The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.129 W Francis St.HPC018-002735-124-79-002 HPC018-00 129 W. Francis Final HPC Â«CA N A) 6-1.> Ame 604 N 2-3 7 -0/ H - -tiv e - f OU,-*tc~~~t-.4- S C-a/.vu~_gl 1*- 6.-t- P CASE NUMBER HPC018-00 PARCEL ID # 2735-124-79002 CASE NAME Vickery Final HPC Review PROJECT ADDRESS 129 W. Francis PLANNER Amy Guthrie CASE TYPE Final HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Jake Vickery REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 6/14/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso729=2000 .5â‚¬-2,0 c, 0 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 9/7/01 BY J. Lindt pA-REEID:|2735-124-79002 ' DATE RCVD: |7/3/00 ~#COPIES:| ' - "CASE NO|HPC018-00 CASE NAME:|Vickery Final HPC Review PLNR:|Amy Guthrie PROJ ADDR:|129 W Francis CASE TYP:~Final HPC STEPS:~- OWN/APP: Jake Vickery ADR~100 S. Spring #3 C/Stz: ]Aspen/CO/81611 PHN: ~925-3660 REP:| ADR:~ C/S/Z) PHN1 FEES DUE:|Exempt FEES RCVD:|Paid in Conceptual STAT: F REFERRALS| REF:~ BY~ DUE:~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED DATE OF FINAL ACTION:i 014/90 CITY COUNCIL:: -FAB Â·- 62.) C REMARKS| pz. /.18/ b., -- - BOA: -~-6-â€¢,le CLOSED: | 9/1/4 BY: 1 3. L,-2 Ac/# DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN:1\-pp,ov *-3 . DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Jake Vickery, 1000 S. Spring Court #3, Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot B, Vickery Historic Lot Split. City and Townsite of Aspen Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Extension of Conceptual Approval Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Historic Preservation Commission Resolution #49-2000,6/14/00 5 6 - ZoO O Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) June 24,2000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) October 24,2000 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 24th day of June, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community Avelopment Direptor. CJK-.)44- Jolie Ann Woods, Community Development Director PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot B, Vickery Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, by resolution of the Historic Preservation Commission numbered 29, series of 2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/City of Aspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on June 24,2000 ASPEN HISTO 1-1 C PRESERVATION COMMI Uk.JI ON MINUTES Or, July 26,2000 MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve Resolution 37, 2000 for the single family residence of 232 E. Hallam Street with the following conditions: 1) Prior to any additional work on the fence on the subject property: a) The applicant shall grant a permanent and non-revocable trail easement to the City ofAspen for the existing trail across the property located at 232 E. Hallam within 30 days of this public hearing. If the trail easement is not conveyed to the City ofAspen within this timeframe, this approval shall be rendered null and void and the portion of the fence forward of the front facade of the house shall be removed immediately at the owner's expense. b) The existing berm in the right-of-way shall be removed within 14 days of this public hearing. 2) Prior to the construction of the proposed fence in the public right-of- way, the Applicant shall apply for an encroachment licensefrom the City Engineer 's office. 1 3) Staff and monitor, Parks Dept., Engineering Dept. and the owner's representative shall meet to discuss the landscaping issues ofthe property and after that meeting a revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the entire HPC Board for review and approval. Gilbert clarified that essentially before any work can continue on the fence we remove the topic o f the berm that they need to provide a trail easement and they also need to get the approval of Engineering. The berm that is in the public right-of-way needs removed within 14 days. Yes voter R ally, Gilbert, Suzannah, Susan, Melanie, Lisa Motion carried 6-0. 129 W. FRANCIS - FINAL - PH Amy relayed that the project is one halfofthe lot split that was approved in 1995. They got an HPC award and the historic house has already been renovated. In general staff supports the proj ect. The design approved at conceptual level was somewhat less neo-Victorian in character than this is. Staff also has concerns with the material selections and they should be restudied in order for the project to meet the final review criteria. Staff has concerns with the roof, which is shown as an octagonal scalloped shingle, 10 ASPEN HISTO Ill C PRESERVATION COMMI 001 ON MINUTES OF, July 26,2000 the fish scale shingles in the gable ends of the house and turned porch posts and balusters. In the historic house such as the front porch reconstruction was needed and that detail was much simpler than what is being proposed on this new house. The rest of the conditions of approval are standard conditions of approval. Sworn in were: Jake Vickery and Mr. Alciator Jake relayed that the Alciator' s are trying to build a traditional house as opposed to a Victorian house. We are not trying to be neo-Victorian but traditional. We tried to be straightforward with this design. The house that has been remodeled is 123 W. Francis. A model was passed around indicating the different heights. The design fits in the neighborhood. We tried to hold the second floor massing back from the very front of the house so as to resonate with the scale of 123 W. Francis. There are no variances. The sideyards are actually ten feet on each side. There is a good spacing between the historic house and the new house. Nancy Alcitor informed the board that she had this property under contract with Jake. They chose the property for the neighborhood and they like the conceptual plan. The changes are based on their personal biases. They came from a traditional home background and that is what they want to create on the property. They want a straighter line more classic look. They had no objections to changing the shingles. Regarding the other objections such as cut sheets on light fixtures, landscaping plan they are happy to do that. They are willing to work with the HPC. QUESTIONS & CLARIFICATIONS Jake said on the old house it has octagon shingles on the two end gables and the front gable. There are octagon shingles just on the bay and the rest of the house is roofed with shingles. The octagonal use is somewhat of a reference of what is going on with the historic house. Chairperson Suzannah Reid opened and closed the public hearing. 11 ASPEN HISTE 1-1 C PRESERVATION COMMIESION MINUTES OF, July 26. 2000 COMMENTS Rally stated that the proposed house has descent proportions to it. He has reservations with some of the material choices but those can be handled with Staff and Monitor and he is in support of the project. Gilbert also supports the resolution. Susan stated that the Victorian fish scale elements should be eliminated. Lisa agreed with staff that the shingle choice should be simplified. It competes too much with ornateness with the historic house. The historic house is asphalt shingle and Lisa would recommend that the new house have asphalt shingles or a simplified shingle but nothing over decorative. The detail on the gables should be scaled back. Suzannah relayed that she had nothing to add to staffs memo. MOTION: Rally moved to grant final approval for 129 W. Francis Street, private residence -with the following conditions: 1. The applicant must -work with staff and monitor to choose alternative materials for the roof, shingles in the gable ends, porch posts, and balusters in order to avoid creating a historic appearance on the new house. 2. Cut sheets ofall proposed exterior lighting fixtures must be submitted for approval by staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 3. A landscape plan must be reviewed by staff and monitor prior to installation. No trees or other vegetation that blocks views of the historic house will be approved. 4. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations without first being reviewed and approved by HPC stajf and monitor. 5. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet -with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for a building permit. 12 ASPEN HISTO 1-- C PRESERVATION COMMIaaION MINUTES OF, July 26,2000 6. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. motion second by Melanie. -Yes vote: Rally, Gilbert, Susan, Suzannah, Melanie, Lisa Motion carries 6-0 MOTION: Suzannah moved to adjourn; second by Rally. All in favor, motion carried. Meeeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 13 . 141!Il!11Ill 11Illl Illl11Illl Ilwilb~"I Ill lilli lili lili 445981 08/10/2000 10:30A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR 129 W. FRANCIS STREET, LOT B, VICKERY HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, BLOCK 56, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel Identification No. 2735-124-79-002 RESOLUTION No.39, SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jake Vickery, has requested final approval for the property at 129 W. Francis Street, Lot B, Vickery Historic Lot Split. Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen. The project involves building a new house on a landmark lot; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.C.5 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof: and l im m' 111111 lili ll'll lilli 111.1111111111 lili 445981 08/10/2000 10:30A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer. in her staff report dated July 26, 2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards. found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions: and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 26, 2000. the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards. and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 6 toO. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the review standards are met and HPC grants final approval for 129 W. Francis Street, Lot B, Vickery Historic Lot Split, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the July 26.2000 meeting, as follows: 1. The applicant must work with staff and monitor to choose alternative materials for the roof, shingles in the gable ends. porch posts. and balusters in order to avoid creating a historic appearance on the new house. 2. Cut sheets of all proposed exterior lighting fixtures must be submitted for approval by staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 3. A landscape plan must be reviewed by staff and monitor prior to installation. No trees or other vegetation that blocks views of the historic house will be approved. 4. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 5. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 6. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 26th day of July, 2000. Apprg=Laito Form: David Hoefer, Assistant Â¢ity Attorney . -111!111 lilli mi lilli lilli .1111'11111111111111111 445981 08/10/2000 10:30A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 3 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1Â« Suzannan K~a, Lhair ATTEST: 2-,f 0Â·J:r , -1/ 1/ / j OLLLAAA ,4~'t/*Uu/L'OAL- Kathy StrickUnd, Chief Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR 129 W. FRANCIS STREET, LOT B, VICKERY HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, BLOCK 56, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel Identification No. 2735-124-79-002 RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jake Vickery, has requested final approval for the property at 129 W. Francis Street, Lot B, Vickery Historic Lot Split. Block 56. City and Townsite of Aspen. The project involves building a new house on a landmark lot; and WHEREAS, all development in an 'H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.C.5 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "h." Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks wh :re proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character o f the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. and . WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer, in her staff report dated July 26, 2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards. found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 26. 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of _ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the review standards are met and HPC grants final approval for 129 W. Francis Street, Lot B, Vickery Historic Lot Split, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen. as presented at the July 26,2000 meeting, as follows: 1. The applicant must work with staff and monitor to choose alternative materials for the roof, shingles in the gable ends, porch posts, and balusters in order to avoid creating a historic appearance on the new house. 2. Cut sheets of all proposed exterior lighting fixtures must be submitted for approval by staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 3. A landscape plan must be reviewed by staff and monitor prior to installation. No trees or other vegetation that blocks views of the historic house will be approved. 4. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 5. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 6. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 26th day of July, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohison. Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 129 W. Francis Street- Final DATE: July 26,2000 SUMMARY: The applicant requests final approval for "Unit B." the new house on this historic landmark lot split project. HPC granted approval for the project in 1995, and it was the first to use the lot split process as a means to preserve a historic resource. The original house. the Mathews House. was built in 1888. APPLICANT: Jake Vickery. architect and owner. LOCATION: 129 W. Francis Street, Lot B. Vickery Historic Lot Split, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen. FINAL REVIEW PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H." Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section 1 l ---5-,Pl L i L , 1- Â» exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to section 5-510(B)(2). Response: Minutes and drawings from the May 24, 1995 meeting, when the project received conceptual approval, are attached for HPC's reference. The main focus of the discussion at that time was in regard to the concept of the lot split. No conditions were specifically placed on the design of the new house and the HPC accepted the demolition of the outbuilding currently sitting on that lot as a necessary part of the project. (Note that the HPC inspected the building and found that it was not particularly old construction.) Work on the historic house on the property has been completed and was given an HPC award. The applicant has submitted plans for final review of the new house, including specifications for materials. The plans are not identical to those reviewed at conceptual, but maintain the same basic massing and many other features originally proposed. A streetscape elevation. showing the new house in context with the historic building to the east, has been requested for the HPC meeting. Staff has some minor concerns with the design that must be worked out for final approval to be granted. The conceptual design appears to have had a somewhat simpler, less overtly historical character. In particular, elements like glazing in the gable ends and asymmetrical window placement identified the building as 'new." The plans for final review are slightly less successful in that regard, so staff finds that it is particularly important to select materials that help make the distinction. In particular, there are concerns with the use of an octagonal shaped roof shingle, octagonal shingles in the gable ends. and turned balusters and posts. In regard to the roof material, the historic structure used a traditional square shingle and the new house should not depart from that with a more decorative design. The drawings show diamond shaped shingles in the gable ends, but an octagonal or "fishscale" shingle is indicated on a cut sheet. Staff finds that this replicates the historic house. As for the front porch and balusters, even on the historic house, where the original front porch was missing and a new one was constructed, the porch columns are squared and have very little detail. Staff recommends that the materials be simplified, and be approved with the monitors. Two other standard conditions of approval are relevant to this project. The applicant must receive approval for a landscape plan when one is developed and must submit cut sheets showing proposed light fixtures. The landscape plan must avoid adding trees or other vegetation that would block views of the historic resource. 2 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood o f the parcel proposed for development. Response: The parcel is surrounded by inventoried properties. historic landmarks and National Register structures. The applicant has made a very strong effort to respect the existing context and has successfully renovated the historic structure on the site. The new house will be a positive contribution to the character of the area. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The development does not affect the historic significance of the Mathews house, a 19th century miner's cottage. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff has recommended simplification of proposed materials so that this standard will be met. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC grant Final approval with the following conditions: 3 1. The applicant must work with staff and monitor to choose alternative materials for the roo f, shingles in the gable ends, porch posts, and balusters in order to avoid creating a historic appearance on the new house. 2. Cut sheets of all proposed exterior lighting fixtures must be submitted for approval by staff and monitor prior to purchase and installation. 3. A landscape plan must be reviewed by staff and monitor prior to installation. No trees or other vegetation that blocks views of the historic house will be approved. 4. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 5. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 6. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Exhibits: Resolution No. , Series of 2000 A. Staff memo dated July 26,2000. B. Final application. C. Conceptual approval and minutes. In-A UG U 4 ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPUCATION FORM 1. Project name |'29 \A)Â£45-6 74*kble 2. Project location 0 46> pâ‚¬C - LOT 6 1 V Icetal,~ Pfit-yorat., l.dF (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounas description) d:,Â·02-& T00*, 3. Present zoning 996 4. Lot size 6 â‚¬-50 + 5. Applicanfs name, address and phone number -01 ke \/ 101Â«rzq, PTOÂ· So< 12360: prer,E-N *1611,92â‚¬-- 3> 64* 6. Representative's name. address, and phone number S.Ad\AG; Ae â‚¬6 5 7. Type of acclicaticn (check all that apply): Conditicnal Use Conceptual SPA Concectual HPC Special Review Final SPA . .b<- Final HPC 8040 Greenline Concectual P'JO Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Rekcation HPC Subdivisicn TexUMap Amend. Histaric Lancmarx GMCS ailorment GMQS exempticn Demc/Partial Demo View P!ane Condominiumization Design Review Lct SclitiLct Line Appeal Committee _ Adjustment 8. Descricticn of existing uses (number and type cf existing structures, accrcximate sc. 1, number of bedrccms, any previcus accrovais granted to the property) 1.0 -7 19:> 60Â¢-0, CM-r VA-C~Jl- EXCLFT- Fog- A) 0,3 - 6+19773 rE IC Skâ‚¬JED, 9. Description of development application 1 14 1,) 269.1 IDâ‚¬3 LE' 10. Have you ccmpleted and attached the following? 71 Attachment 1 - Land use application form h Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form F Response to Attachm ent 3 b Response to Attachments 4 and 5 -579-U \ C \0 l r- L- ~r i i \ Ek . 11111111 Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk ~ , _ ATTACHMENT 5 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: FINAL REVIEW All applications for final review must include the following information: ~ 1. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be used for the proposed development -g 2. Finalized drawings of the proposal at 1/4"=1'0 scale. 3. A statement of the effect of the details of the proposed development cn the original design of the histcMc structure (if applicable) and character of the - neighborhood. 4. A statement of hcw the final development plan conforms to the representations made during the conceptual review and resccnds to any ccnditions placed thereon. -84.4 826 Fosâ‚¬c> 26 91,U>EN 86 le Cn -FRE 1 ' li)-r 09- pÂ¢rl Â·0AVT0 Etc., OfT 1 ~ f; 5,51. 7 0-râ€ž 4, 4 \ 9-'JAL eIVE, 790-Â¥3922 028,0 9,1,0]3 ffâ‚¬ArT 86)71 9512/7% 5 00 OF}=2546%114 4 264 KN 01 ASP 01 0 \4Â» Dwees :Â®â‚¬ 7-*06 4-rED. AlÂ£, Go'aq,g ip rAA<9431 8692 0~ 18 997;45 9 A{204 -pE>Elver] VE Of: R l<:270(24OM-Â· 1Â«/\U-S L 8/911 %158 93 4 14'ElA UPI:*rE>O P'012- 1 2 ft//0 4 h C d V 64 0-* 1 1 .27 C.40,<;Â»'70401-WV\ 90*41Â»12134 , J - ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant J AILE V1 6466 /all Address: 1 1 61 \&154-r . f>1*N 61 9 Zone district: le- 00 Lot size: - Existing FAR -0- ~ Allowable FAR: 07) 30 Prcposed FAR: 1,1 25 Existing net leasable (commercial): - /4- Prcpcsed net leasable (commercial): i I - Existing 36 of site c=verage: 31 2. 3% â‚¬ ri - â‚¬ 5/6 - Prccosed 9/0 cf site coverage: /0/ 0,5 3 - :-6 2 1 - Â·29~ 6/C - Existing % of open space: - A I L-4 - ' - Prccasec % of ccer! scace: Existing maximum heign: Pnncical ticc: 96' Accescr/Dice A)/A - P==sed max. height: Princ:cal tide:: 8 5 Accesscrv bidc: 11 /A. P==sed 36 of derncliticrt: 1.40 + 90-n / A) 1, 1-4-1611*A#j j Existing number of bedrccrns: _ 0 4 Pricased number of tedrccrns: 4 Existing cn-site carKIng spaces: D C n-site parking scaces required: .5 Sertacks -.. =<:Sting: Minimum fecuired: P.cocsed: j ir,-r.Â· .- Frcnt: 1 A Frant: 10' Rear -- Rear: 1 0 ' = Rear: 1 1 ' Ccmcined Ccmtined 1 Cambined A ./1 Frccorear: - Frant/rear:%0 Frant/rear: 7(/ Sice: - S ice: Â£ ' s ice: A S ider - Side: M ' Side: -4-T--3.1 it .11 Cambined Cambiriet- i _ li Combined ~ j Sices: - 1 Sides: 1 21 -M Sides: I 22/1 , Existing nonccr#crmities cr enccachments: *-5 9.J~.4#CP Is On 'EÂ»20- 'Fisf LI Nâ‚¬ Variaticns requested: k j /4 1 â‚¬ . (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.1. site coverage variance up to 536. height variations underthe ccttage inlill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods. Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 129 W. Francis Street- Extension of conceptual approval DATE: June 14,2000 SUMMARY: This project received conceptual development approval on May 24, 1995. It was the first landmark lot split, and work on the historic house on the other half of the site has been completed. The new house is the subject of this request. Section 26.415.010.C.2.b. 1 of the Land Use Code provides that an application for final development review shall be filed within one year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless HPC grants an extension, failure to file the final development application shall make the approval null and void. One year extensions have been granted four times, with the most recent set to expire on May 12, 2000. The applicant, Jake Vickery, requests HPC approval for a four month extension of conceptual approval, to prepare drawings for final review. This item was originally scheduled for discussion on May 10, 2000, but the applicant was unable to attend. The conceptual design is attached for your review. With the upcoming adoption of the new guidelines, staff has been concerned with allowing older approvals to maintain a vested rights status. This project is well designed and the old house received an HPC award. however there may be some aspects of the new house that would be viewed differently under the guidelines. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the HPC discuss the reasons for delay with the applicant and determine whether a short term extension (4 months or less) would allow enough time to finish the drawings. Beyond that. the approval should not be extended again. Exhibits: A. Conceptual approval 4 *0404, -7-0 I .1 4 .d.: .. :te" ' :-: .Â·.I'~-.~~-~~~ }~4/fÂ® :tiJP *Cri:LIW#Â·Ng/efA#*P '2:- 94 - 4446***/91-ht/Mil/1 4/Ub '*. 2'r 'f. A~ - :- *o#f~ I4 8~ M26,,~~1~~ .*ij- IL. . liA : 12 .. % ,/ i-1-1~.It- *re - 1 4. ,=10':,?4 .. M Pr. /19'" ,â€¢ .-.- r. â€¢ 1/ rililiE,&" .4*I _*Mt-'-pt-/7-4/:.44 + Fo bÂ¥. il~ 6 lael VE---1/22/, ... ty f. 4 .; C.T,'413 FAF16.!t .,r 19*414-2, --.'-44514- L ~74,0 1 :: 4_ 0 510 Â· -r-- .. ,. -44.- ...Er , RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 123 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jake Vickery, has requested a one year extension of the HPC conceptual approval for the property located at 123 W. Francis Street. The conceptual approval was originally granted on May 24,1995 and the property is a designated historic landmark; and WHEREAS, Section 26.72.010.F.3.c of the Municipal Code states that "Application for a final development plan shall be filed within one (1) year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless an extension is granted by HPC, failure to file such an application shall render null and void the approval of a conceptual development plan previously granted by the HPC; and WHEREAS, previous extensions of conceptual approval have been granted by the HPC and the extension is set to expire on May 13,2000; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 12,2000, recommended another extension be granted; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on May 12, 2000, the Commission considered and approved a shorter extension without conditions by a vote of 7 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That a four month extension of conceptual approval for 123 W. Francis Street, Aspen, Colorado be granted, to expire on September 12,2000. 1. A four month extension to the applicant with the proviso that when they do come in for the final that the board will scrutinize the project aggressively. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of May, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 123 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 23, SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jake Vickery, has requested a one year extension of the HPC conceptual approval for the property located at 123 W. Francis Street. The conceptual approval was originally granted on May 24, 1995 and the property is a designated historic landmark; and WHEREAS, Section 26.72.010.F.3.c of the Municipal Code states that "Application for a final development plan shall be filed within one (1) year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless an extension is granted by HPC, failure to file such an application shall render null and void the approval of a conceptual development plan previously granted by the HPC; and WHEREAS, previous extensions of conceptual approval have been granted by the HPC and the extension is set to expire on May 13, 1999; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 12, 1999, recommended another extension be granted; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on May 12, 1999, the Commission considered and approved the request without conditions by a vote of 7 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That a one year extension of conceptual approval for 123 W. Francis Street, Aspen, Colorado be granted, to expire on May 12,2000. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of May, 1999. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Izzlj MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director '~f'lu Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director ~fi . i FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 123 W. Francis Street- Extension of conceptual approval DATE: May 12,1999 SUMMARY: This project received conceptual development approval on May 24, 1995. Section 26.72.010 (F)(3)(c) provides that an application for final development review shall be filed within one year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless HPC grants an extension, failure to file the final development application shall make the approval null and void. The historic house has already been renovated, so that only the development on Lot B, for a new house, requires an extension. Extensions were previously granted on May 8, 1996, January 22,1997, and May 13, 1998, set to expire on May 13, 1999. At this time the applicant, Jake Vickery, requests HPC approval for an additional one-year extension of conceptual approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conceptual development approval for 123 W. Francis Street (Lot B) be extended until May 12, 2000. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to extend conceptual approval for 123 W. Francis Street (Lot B) to May 12,2000." Exhibits: Resolution No. , Series of 1999. A. Staff memo dated May 12, 1999. B. Conceptual design. 844 \4 CY-Â· +4 . RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 123 W. FRANCIS STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jake Vickery, has requested a one year extension of the HPC conceptual approval for the property located at 123 W. Francis Street. The conceptual approval was originally granted on May 24, 1995 and the property is a designated historic landmark; and WHEREAS, Section 26.72.010.F.3.c of the Municipal Code states that "Application for a final development plan shall be filed within one (1) year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless an extension is granted by HPC, failure to file such an application shall render null and void the approval of a conceptual development plan previously granted by the HPC; and WHEREAS, previous extensions of conceptual approval have been granted by the HPC and the extension is set to expire on May 13, 1999; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 12,1999, recommended another extension be granted; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on May 12, 1999, the Commission considered and approved the request without conditions by a vote of to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1/0 That a one year extension of conceptual approval for 123 W. Francis Street, Aspen, Colorado be granted, to expire on May 12, 2000. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of May, 1999. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Â¢ *9297 110Â«89 40 '69,3,> 9â‚¬DJ-- -3. 8 01' -Opdan 640~ C. Al r _-521 0 h-h 91 -4 IL 1.31#C7tg PL7,11224 Ue Â«pez{Lp + 02, Lirf -= Ovv -4 /-kLLOAL 0 OCE. 2 9.7-014 5 11 I i >3 -3 3 C f -% 1- -0 â‚¬ G i /? 4 -5>=8 4 11 9< L 91 -7/ 1 /4 C N 022 9 744 * 9 Co = (3 1 1 x 41 f? t b 1 --14 4 vi,FeeR 'tyr.*: * U tv' 39â‚¬294 8>9 0 0 Â¥4 3 /5-/1Ar ? , Col 00) 2 1L f . 1 2,9 WÂ·99-E Â·Frz*W CAL 9 1/00 , M Â«2/>[ 2.5 - wÂ«- * 022 7 2 -R5*/ 4 -57~77/~1 Â»Ft##fir ilig/VU'il/El fyip) 194 2 l.4> UJ'*-2 Lxd (U/- ' r C *.4 3 & Â·f' L,''fc- ~* UFFee I ,><. 6 96, FLAP) 9 Me.(223 007 94;N â‚¬ LES - I f+9664- . )/3 9 5'12700"16405 ~071 TA 22< 6 %05 przÂ«' TEL -RE,1 4 13 Co 06 NN [Nj vÂ»- ,pu '&043[2) SNAPED 2* 00 3/2- â‚¬ ><10 VE> wd.(AL \Al I N PRUS'J- USOE) ClÂ»-ID~ -Fl>KE 131 v < DED LIâ‚¬PI'Tk' 9*0 0 \1â‚¬05) GNP +P . fÂ»ll 1 4 1 4 ,.. *7$ 9-7%+ O 9" erÂ» -9 FA/L (Z 0 i N.50''i Â£, Y'11=A k her.8 -* ke RAA 4-+-IA I A/1 j C .5~ /110Â·, <A A A 1/1 /A ./1'.r 1 2,9 u 19f fC-A k]6 (fi 48*2 t- 94+1Ati LES l Ornamental Redwood- Skingles 7//02 e ff Mad River Woodworks supplies 16-inch shingles trimmed to a perfect 5 or 6 inches, 10 produce a repeating, uniform pattern throughout. For reasons of both beauty and durability, we offer redwood shingles; also, experts in the field actually prefer redwood. Its time-tested longevity is proven by the rnany fine Victorian homes well over 100 years old in our area. AAXA ~ Sawtooth - ) ~ ~clagon 13 Diagonal .\r-10\ Arrow Round - Hexagon Diamond V Fish Scale Halfcove _ Square Redwood - L)(ff A a t,J _ 770 9 ' r le]Kets 31"x21/2"x36" 31"x31/2"x36" PlOOI I P P 105 Picket Fences are a way to create yoi your home. 2 . 4 1 . e A,64 . Avelae: Â»~Â»:i~i,-io",Â· â€žjii,ily 2 'Ar Â¥4.6.*AÂ«?49~&1~1 , r'.P %*{...1Â«~ ~~Â¥tu. .> r ... ". e 49*49-MAT h.. -,1, 74., 1 '1 ./.57.-0,1 67 93-+ cm 1 - 4/#18(25/<fiefvt,Fijr~& - f 1 14.-, - - 4.4.- .O 'f,~114 Â· 1 44*4:~~9% - c#-* ~ .3 0* -&44-.iff-.2.ift~iâ‚¬>3~Â· at- 4 ** 2 3. t.: "'FP.*Are,31 , 1 /04- 40*-*- 7 9 ' . 1. Â· I I .~ .-=A ...6 - -- .2 4 Â¥r ..r T..~ 4 --) 4 ' A-/ 6.JÂ«~/.: 4 5,# , _. I~(: 024 '4 1 ..,416 x .. 'SY...,44 4, -: 9 L - A E- 0 lipp, 37* 1. , 4 - .1. ~ *~ imi;a-. f . f ~ '42 i -02- re th g .4 6 -0 p Ai' - f:,ir*36227;. -. --:- 2<%f-~Er'.1 4 191 - . 4 - A ' , ... ... 5Â¢ 1~15 0\ :*K,Â¥*~rL;. . - 69-vit .' ~ ..' t#~-4'1~r... - rt . I. 4 2 v : 33**aft ~ ~ ~ /45*~*iÂ¢,ify.~ 4-30- .4,3~ji._ :ttlf Â»Â«a..6 i t, \-tt{'14134*44 -~.56/ciD 4 I .... 7-fl .rs' %--I . ' Â«en 1 Â·Â· .~LL_. I 46* w / 3 / .a- I 1 - 2 < 4 4, 01.â€ž : . - I - t. .rt&'6 54$ . UP .te' Â· '51Â·1 -,5*r, L. <~*r'.~~~~ . I - s. 0,0##TO:3 ~..f.IP.,;. 4. 82'.441'f~1 -,, fil:Gi~mi.li/4,4./Se~V 49*e>J *jff**fedka*-.4:fi~>,ff:i~.-11., 4*, - . '*~~ f04,Â·....%**f* 7- . ~ - ~~~.~ :~ #. 7'2**Ot . , , ... 1 -:f,-it'T - Â· :-%4.Lt .. 1 ~L '1' .-~ 4 +2452 9%#- Â·t:09 SUâ€¢ ' Â·' 1617*~ Â¥0,i *-< . â€¢-rÂ·45-Â¥-dâ‚¬Â»74-#Arâ€¢-Â«-7-#FY . -I i 1/-4: Â·. rE'*!094Â¥~~~3994-7Â¥pl Â· 4 ' 'w-2Z= . 2 4.0.9 AÂ¥-T@Opywq.Ifol,4" .. , 444*Â¥ 4211- 4 //41 di --~~~~~~- '44.,9Â».419 r ..Â£4/'*-*#0':3 2 I.gr,bA.44*Bwi' -4 4*(Pti ~ J~IAA,-139>.. . & .4 " ' '/'Derit)*1*i:geri?dia- i.:32,6.:Â·:*~i-- 1~lizi#.4444*$.iciqt, I e 4 . A . 1 1-..F f *.7 , ...9 - .5 - ' ' 1 -- . â€¢ ..7, 'h ..17174-Air, 4' , :r~< Â£~, , 5-Â·:iu , , . . 'f Â·-i t, 4 -A vi ~ tÂ» F# '--* Â» 7. 1 4124.A r .I ,Â·: ,=Â·4Â£.-Â·IL ~r'trÂ·'tÂ·=zÂ·:per:e*97:**,A.-06â‚¬i*,5 4 p aâ€¢, f~~ k W - 9... e- . I ;ter r . t '1'I- ' ..24 I 1, .liviv * - 4 . , *VN CA# 4 .42* '' - 0,0-0Â·64/**gvlpas&N Â¥ I . =202.40*04.- 1 M .11*04'.7:1Â¥fteÂ»*e*.- , ,~ ~ Wi,Â· 1% ~ I - 'a" 4'' i./*9 ' 1 1 . . 6 k j tr I.- 4./ - -, -.19Â»$. *t . M-.0 - *1-7 Wh:' f #4,5,iraitpH .NF j '~0,<I ?fBAf~F' 22 1241.4:2 r '6~9~~~"~~~Â£~. '11, 3 4 ~'*A-~~~m.8->(4*-*2&*94~VÂ«<0***01*C â€¢4**Â», ' 0. Â· mie ~r,sfi.6 348*adjsk,Mi~*:,~~.I#*0Â«931:N-fity>-sta th*et,7..74* #2&*JÂ«:EN r . f":~Â·L - L n *-%Â»'tÂ¥Â·~ 4,-'74â€¢~,395.49 :'1*â‚¬6,WQ#~2-Â·s '4"6~"-'r -~~ '" ' , ' 11.k.ir.:f,1.:T . 6 < 6.brxr~-Â£ .. 4' - 1 3 .:Lt ; r. ' . 1 . 3 thi : P 2*r. r 74 i.3 +97 4 6 4..L, G 1 't Y i j fÂ· d . 4 ,Â¢f:Â·fi ... /4 . 4 1 0,#/ 1 lii, E i '8Â· '1 :4* ',., .1 ilit: i , rt e . 3 ' 5 : ' 4 , I . '.1 f 4 , I. '1 0 Pot Â»T TAM&'c-ls $ 71 loiDa Porch Posts Gabl * P B....ht I . eli 1 ... W,â„¢4.. ./ 3...?t #ZI .1-1 A. . , ~~ ff(] A-'20' Â· f u . 9 Â· 7 3% 1 . d.... 4-41 4-3.1 1 7 ' ~0Â¥f../.- + Â·2721 41 -53 41 12 ... At' . ..:,t~.9..... .....'20Â· ' Â· Â·Â· Â· t- 'r I ..Al ..40... 5 ....1.1. ...i ....9 44. 1. 1-:43'. . -3:Â·re : Â·74<ki. -:2'. 1/1 *... ..=Â·140 : *4<93 41 65 ../:' *$ V. : e,t F.: 990 Ti.-43: .... . . .71â€¢â€¢ .. Wâ€¢.1, . 094Â·30.- 2% - 7. I *:' ./.1 4..4 B . 1 4. 4 i Â·ikil Put the fin; feeling of t 1 -1 M Â· : . Â· z,UJ* 9:.'. Mae/RY 44'Ii: . I #51 A/B/C #52 A/B/C #53 A/B/C #54 A/B/C #55 A/B/C All Potch Posts turned from solid 60'\6" clear heavt c:edar. Finished size is 5 /2 " x514 ". Specify A for 8% B for 9% and C for 10'. Posts over 10'can be ordered. Call fordetails. Shipped motor-freightonly. *tia//shipmentsof 8' posts can be sent UPS. Add $17.50 shipping pei post. Solid 8 " x8" available. 20 ...If.. .., I .. l aft \*-0- Newel Posts TTLkl\JPL_ f #Trf...141 .:94'~b 1 , 35" . 9 1 7 44,* 145 I 4 :**:.....:.! . 1 ~.P:. 3':1.7*:9:':41*4f:&:-cÂ· t.!9 Â¢52< 214. 43,;~. 'Â· r,'11''i 446.44667#*1544*41*k t .46- ording -4-- <,7,~L. 4?16.,SE,~'=D. Al':- Â·â€¢ - Â·Â· 2 ~:1:e. "1,2.4. -,4... .'~-.- .- -7.' .. h. . ~ .. .49: ,U,Â·Al 3.K-Â· - 1, :d,+5411 ... 9; 4"a>.+7:....P-,47:,:1:- -Â·.i,B.Â·Â· ,-.,1Â·~424% I . . -1.V'. ..4 *964:, .. 5..h I 6 1.1-111 11 1, ! 1,1 liliÂ·'.,1 It. 1 11'g 12 1. 09. 1 1 d.Â·.': f Â·. stingorcut- Shown) 1. Sides 1233 2 4, 1 9 Vary by Shipping. a i . iting Fee. ' 41 NE#.3 Â· Â· J . M....... :gl ' 5 4 St' *. , kÂ·: 9 1 0 , t -0'.'M t..1 I. !124.- I .:.:*'17:27: "Nuit.Â·. f.... 93.4 ....Ct::.3 .4. ....: :ri .,4 #41 A/B #42 A/B #43 A/B ilii- t * ~ :eart cedar - specify A for i M "x514 ". Neweis can be End Supplement 67-1- F e'o L U e(o te, /ailable. *297--5 19 . /3 Mfluki log (461--FipPiLA Â« Headers Balusters 7f #127 97,4-2:'Aw/1 7414/24Â©3*fil 26-3/4" x 9" #128 36-1/2 8-1/2 E *TN 1 0 Â£ AÂ» Â£ Lk 9-LE -0 â‚¬4 -0-.444 #129 42" x 6-1/8" , 1/ Add the finis. our Balusters. ' 'I It - . . . .r.. .1 Â·-' ~hÂ· Â·' 1---b'L'..'-'R:/'- . - .; , t.Â·A 1.LÂ·Â·4 Corbels I . - 4 41 Â«36 1 m- 349-.6 4.Â· *4043 < 1.1 /1 ''li54. .. 4. 4 ' 4 , L #34 A/B #33 A/B > - . i.. 2 1..... I ' #31 A/B ~ I H . Â¢ It 4/ FÂ·~ /7 1 t i All turned Balusters are made from solid 3"x 3" clear heart cedar. Specify A for 32" post. Specify B for 36" post. Finished size is 214 " x 21/'2 Â© Copy Antho 18 t ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 24, 1995 Chairperson Linda Smisek opened the nublic hearing. - Amy: This is a 10,500 sqtz. ion and zhe historic house is in the center of the loc. This application also involves the PEZ. Thev wculd like co relocate the historic house and oronose to do a lot - solit creating a 4,500 and 6, 000 scft. lot. This is a code - amendment chat would only be allowed for nistcric landmarks because vou are creating a non ccnforminc lot you usually have zo have two - 6,000 sqft. lots and part or che idea is then less FAR would be direczed to the historic house and che 6,000 sqft. loc could be developed as a normal 6,000 sqft. lot. The ccde amendment is non unde- your ourview but lE you have comments PEZ needs co cake =hem into consideration. Even withouc the ccde amendment you would be able to do two separate structures crl this property. You can do that on 9,000 sqft. cr larger. The difference here i3 chan ownership can be attached to =wo separace people. The total FAR 1 or the lot is being held to the aup.ex FAR which is 4,170 sqft. If these were two legal lots the total FAR would be about 6,000 safz. and that is non what is being proposed under the ~code amendmenc, thev are restrictina it co wnaz the aun_ex wouid the oriainal site which is gocd. I am recommending HPC suppers the landmark designation as it meets standard B, E, F. CONCEPTUAL Amv: We are being asked to review an addition to :he hi -- 4- 1 -/- 4 1-1 =re 2 â€ž21 17 -1- - 9 structure and a construction oz an u--u-_ -- y new house. .6- L. 4- - -/-0. --4.- -i- 1- 1 Mifi ---- two designs compatible and svI-Jachetic co the neighcorhood and zhe - historic resource. I am interested in the resolution or the Erin= i. . . . corner cf the house. The house is essentia_-y in ins origine.- . form. There is a Trons door that nas been clcsed and you can see bead beard chat was the roof of the pcrch inside a closet. 1 --I-- 94= 1-h= prcposal shows replacing the porch and buildinc on ton UL U.-1- -r addicion and it would real_y involve removing the roof. The =Ar44 - * er applicant is adding a minimal amount of space. The tccal (Au,uL---V-- to the historic house is 587 sqfc. and chey are asking tor a FAR bcnus of 500 sqft. so than they can add on. Katherine Lee: What would the total FAR be on that lot? Amy: 1430 plus the 500 bonus which is 1950 sqft. That does not include the garage at 500 sqfc. There are three outbuildings on the property, barn, shed and a garage stall. The barn will be turned and made into a garage stall. I feel that is an inzeres=ing solution. One of the trees is proposed tc be relocated. The house has a FAR of about 2900 sqft. which is small chan whan is usually allowed on a 6,000 sqft. lot. The applicant has revised the clans -1 slightly and added an octagonal eiemen= to address the screen. 3 r--1 1 t.' Â·*-PU nt l .Â·9 ' ~- d Bl , ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 24, 1995 Katherine Lee: What is the size of the second house? Amy: $2,900. sqft. The project meets all the neighborhood character guidelines. They are asking for a side yard setback and it is on the interior. They are also asking fer site coverage variances of 5% on each lot. They wanc to keep the open space and I support chat. Also if you put an ABU above grade you gen the cottaae infill variance of 5%. If they don't get the variance the ADU will ac into the basement and Staff supports that. They are asking for parking variance of 5 spaces. I recommended tabling because I did not have the new design to review. The issue of the porch may not be resolved until a little demolicion occurs. Les: I am worried about someone cominc in and saying my house is not historic take it off the inventory. Amy: That occurs when there is a lot split but we are designating this from the start. Greg Prickrell, architect presenting for Jake Vickery: One of the ADU's is required and one was suggesned. Melanie: Visually the interior setback is on 2 1/2 feet. Someone could go and put a fanr-= rin and then you have 2 1/2 feet to the L fence. Is there a way thaz you could gen Zive reeL. Amy: Nct unless we demolish paur or the historic building. They have c-=54 + =A a 45 foot frontage. Greg: You are not supposed co create non conforming lots. 1- . Melanie: We are creatinc a squeeze in the past in allcwing houses to get close. Can't we build in a variance of a couple of feez. - I am oppesed to only seeing 2 1/2 reet to the lot line. Amy: We could put in a condition of approval that no fence can be built. Susan: It seems to me that is destroying the character of the neighborhocd by squashing the houses tocether and loosing the side yards. Roaer: If another developer comes in and buys the property what is the maximum square he can put in with the two buildings? Amy: He can build a duplex or two detached buildings or stay with cne building and add on. Roger: If it is a duplex 4170 sqft. is the max and one per unit. If the lot split is allowed what is the maximum square footage allowed? 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 24, 1995 Am.v: 4,170 sqft. plus 500 sqft. bonus from HPC. Roger: By doing the lc= spliz you will have 500 sqfz. In your opinion with the neighborncca does the loc split offer a better project? Amy: Yes, in my opinion. There used co be another house there and this is re-establishing the neighocrhood sattern. Jake's wife Della presented zheir history of living in Aspen. Greg Prickrell: The due diligence on the property terminates June 15ch. We would like to know if HPC feels this projecz is viable We have dcne a thorough investigation of the project. We desire to landmark and we have broken down the massing into smaller scale modules creating smaller ownership modules which preserves the small scale of the neiahborhood. We want to reduce the historical forms co basics with the topology of a cross gable miners cattage. Each historic part has to be evaluation for che extenz and nature of its historical value and concribution or detracrion to the characzer as a whole. There also has zo be architectural intearitv. We want to put che new developmenc on the adjacon parcel. We want ro add new accessory functions co accommcdate today's need to the czczage. We are asking for tne boo sqft. bonus for two bedrooms above grade. Lot A will have the hiszeric cotzage on it and we will utilize the outbuilding as part of che two car garage wich new construcnicn. To che rear of the coczaae we are doing a second floor -W- maszer bedroom. We are oroncsing an ABU gny a - above the garage. On lot B, 129 W. Francis the ADU will be below QUESTIONS Roger: Why should we encourage the code amendment? Amy: It is another incentive for landmarks, that you could do a lot split even though iz is less than 6,000 sqft. and have separaze ownership. It does not result in more FAR. Katherine Lee, neighbor: There is a garage right across the alley and I do not feel there is enough turning radius where you have turned the shed. Greg: I will check it. Roger: I want to be clear on the code amendment? Amy: It will include how the FAR will be distributed for each area. 5 * ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 24, 1995 Martha: If the person sold the house could they get more FAR. Amy: There would be no more FAR available. Melanie: The other lot could come before us and ask for a FAR bcnus. Amy: Yes they could but only if you found it compatible. You could also scate in this approval that that would non be allowed. Greg: We are getting 250 sqft. reduction for doing the cottage -1.-1 inzil_. If we were not doing the ADU we wouidn't need it. Les: They could do the same thing with a PUD. Roger: I would rather hear public comments before our comments. T 4 nA- I We can change the agenda to reflect your concern. Martha: I am concerned about the DulK of the project. Roger: By making it a landmark we can control the bulk and making findings thac the bulk is not compatible with the historic structure. PUBLIC QUESTIONS & COMMENTS Brenda Bigelow: I live on the corner next to house B and I am here representina the landlord. i feel much better knowing if it is designaced the board has more control of the size. Reger: They could have asked for a setback and moved the house clcser to you and instead they moved it in. Katherine Lee: The old house is moving east. Do you have to have the ADU on the new house? Amy: They are creating a new unit so they have to build an ADU for this property. Katherine Lee: Which is the more desirable of the two as it creates more mass. Amy: Only one creates mass as it is above grade the other is below grade. Martha: Except for cars and the impact to the neighborhood. Those are considerations that should be discussed. 6 4 , ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 24, 1995 Melanie: It is a two bedroom ADU so the pessibility exists than uwc more cars will be there. Amy: There is an inccme restriction but I do not know hew many necole can live in one. They are small. - Della, owner: We are doing the ADU on our house for inccme zo an employee. Roger: Are the new elevations sufficient information for Staff to non have to table and we could grant conceptual? Amy: I do not nave any design issues with the project. I am mere concerned with che restoracion aspects of =he historic building. Della: Jake is really concerned about the restoration himself. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Martha: My concern is the second story to the historic house. I am non comfortable with the desian and -%-Â»- -U u=--Cluub. C .00- 4 9 1 0 - -r - rÂ· r 1 Rcaer: With the information so far I would encourage the ccde amendment. I would also recommend =hat conceptual be aouroved wish - CC)11Â·ULL--01123 - The concern cr tne neighber can be addressed by moving one house forward and thus having encuch turning radius. All the desian aspect are fine. We need to address the tree removal and - make sure than it can iive. To address Martha's ccmments i= une see the addi 1- 4 dn 76,0 1 TY==S are iert alone you will hardly ---#-i. -4-- imract - would be 0-c=u#.1- if the crees were net there. I would demand rw"-1-=r . 1 I rescoration of the original rignE perch. I would also put (ne 1 9 window weil scmeplace else pessioly on che west side. Landscaping between the house should be addressed in the mction. Susan: I am also concerned abcut the second snory and do noc like the height frcm the fronc view of the old house. I certainlv wculdn ' t want to see the zrees moved. If there was another house - on ne property it had to be a smazi house. I hate to see the sideyards disappearing. Amy: I totally agree with you bus I would make the argument that having a number of small _ Uu u U- - 1" strll r"-11 -0-=S is better than having a structure with four times the mass added on which really disrupts the rhythm. Linda: I am in agreement with Roger cn the front porch. When I site visited it locked to me that scmeone in past history mighz have taken on a border ana tnac entrance was for that use and I feel ic has a lot of significance to the time and to the house. Â·IÂ·- 1~7- I hignly recommend that be restcred and the lightwell moved fur L- - - .- 7 1 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 24, 1995 back to give the ADU in the basement some space. I feel comfortable with the massing and scale. I am a little concerned about how satisfied a new owner will be with the new house plan and what we will be up against. I feel Jake has done a good job with coming up with new laeas and introducing a new concept for historic preservation and restoration. Les: I feel it is a good plan and it will work. I have difficulty recommending the code amendment until I see it. I am not concerned abouz a new buyer as they will have to work with us. Final will not be easy as everyone has consideracions such as the tower. If there is not a worksession before final I don't want the applicant coming in and saying we got conceptual now we need final. We are grancing conceptual with a lot of considerations. Amy: There is an existing addition and it shows up on the 1904 map and has the original windows and doors. There is a back porch and we have debated whether it should be retained. It will not be visible from the street but Linda made a gocd point recognizing the boarding unic. We little by little are not going to have examples of the evolution of an historic house. There has to be some way to indicate that there was a cne story element there. Katherine Lee: I have been here 14 years and the entire back has been changed so many times thar I couldn't begin to tell you hew many. What are the side yard setback recuirements? Amy: In R6 you have to have 5 feet on each side with a combined total of 15. Katherine Lee: Is the new one 5 feet? Grea: It is at 5 and 10. Chairman Linda Smisek closed the public hearing. MOTION: Roger moved to recommend landmark designation to Le t C, D and E and the East 1/2 of Lct B, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Roger moved to grant conceptual approval as submitted to include partial demolition of the rear addition as show by the removal of the model at this meeting and that we grant the interior sideyard setbacks and site coverage 5% variances on lot A and B as requested with the following conditions for conceptual approval: 1) A worksession with a monitor will be held before final. 2) No moving of tree or trees on the front side of the property. 8 1. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 24, 19 9% 3) That tne restoration of the right porch occur to as close as possible to the original. 4) No fence of any kind either structural or landscape between the interior division of the two prcperties if in fact they are divided. 0) Study the rear garage access to determine if cnere is sufficienc space to enter and exit a garage on the alley. If the study shows that the rearyard setback variance is applicable then we will grant 2 feell on the rear and 3 on the alley side. 6) That we grant the 500 sqft. FAR bonus to Lot A. 7) We waive the 5 parking spaces. Mccion second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. 130 S. GALENA - CITY HALL - MINOR Amy: We approved a lightwell in the back of city hall so that we can build a basement. The basement Will Contain Citv courlcil meeting room and the Sister City meetir _ig room. Whan is bed.na cronosed on the south side is to cut the wall back and light would -6 drift down to the sister city room. There is a sidewalk and traditionally you bring light into a ligh=well and if you cut into -- the sidewalk and relocate it you will puz people right into wher.e the roof dumps snow off. I do not find this a compatible solution ' as it does not respect the rhy=hm of the windows. Possibly this cculd be a trade off of the basement as one of the rooms does non have natural light. Someone has suggested a lightwell with block glass across it and that would be my reccmmendation. Les: This is a landmark building and I do not like what is going on. I went to Breckenridge and they just finished their city hall and it has no windows in the room and they did it on purpose. The lighting was designed well and I talked with members of their council and they indicated that their meetings actually work better. They do not need the natural light for a city council meeting with people distracting them from the outside etc. Cris Caruso, Engineer: Council likes the feeling of the light shining in the room. Council said if I could provide natural light to that room they would consider having the present sister cit-, room moved to the basement with the council chambers otherwise they are against it. If that dcesn't occur we can use the space as storage space or office space. It gets difficult working a full week without natural light. 9 - .fil -li---i- -- r W I Â¢62,.../1, _ - - 2.Â·'Ll & i - --w-- C f ./ â‚¬I\< :... -25- 22<4 > =- \ Llee,2;@pr.--- ' b-45- facj-,resj-4-*CO#m).T 4 . .Â§'r ff- 1 t=4=j :Â«. 2<. 4 r i. *ER "1 dil 1.~ 131 ./ 111 czzz= 111 0 !112- r -- lit 1 1- / TR 2 ~11= 111,1,4 i,< 1 - 111 1, 11% 1 .- 1--- d - i 1 1 11 -, 11 1 "11 M - W 11.11 iii itifir/~ a 1~ Â¤ __ --:~;~ /0,.84030 1 - 1!4 . 01 11 1!1, A- i | 1|| 4 11| F , :11 *k Lril li lli 90 11.11 #1 - i- h 0 11 1-4 IiI; - i I: 111 :4 H ./. '1 19 -~ 1 ~1 11- 1 !~1 III H 1 1 ],1 11 lt,ma=* ,-f~m==F=*i 4 iIUUÂ·i 1-CE=-ri zz=Zi I i i Â·i: b ! 11 21 - FT. 5- --Â·- --_ 1.-Ii.*----' r--I-j 1 4.Il ---=77.- i i 11 1 â‚¬KGALD 1 i ALL si/Aff,161 p i 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 11 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 - w~,Â·764 -~ tua~Â»124-11Â«Â»EIÂ»Â«4-Liuro-02-Â»-- - 01_01 Â·1 41.1.2_ u__ -- --- 449i'.1*L- -Ul--1.-- _1....-- 1 i UM---90 2 A -2.= 49>fÂ©ykt . 1 - OX.2.1 Ag..X ~ 11 11 I 1 ..1:'.I 076 1 #i 44:Â« r===%===3 /x<>\, >40.L======1~~~2~966?;oq~* ~~~~~~ L.lry jt- VL- - E t[-7-E~'1Â» C E- illri-T imI W /1 9 1 0- 1 'lls 11 If 111!1 id= 1 1,1 1~11 '111,111,11 .111 :~.: ~ t-,;J,11 1:i':,~I,~11%11 FI#''Ill:illÂ·.liltil#|iill#~1 lifill!1:51 tli'I|I!,1'; :In,I ~1~- 0''' ,. Â·'~~' , . E +Â·Ii;8 ~'i~I lli~ 9Â·1 jiti li t'*'Â·# 1 11~Â·11| 11 Il lj il;?r ' -,'' 1 61,1 , 4 1 !111 ----T F :,ir .~ ,;~:~. ~ ~~~~Ji 1, 1!..~11:111:11 1~[ 111~ t*1,111: )1 -7--- ---r--1, -, '1 4 11 /,4 51 1, 11 " 1 0 1 B.' il / :1 , 1 - ' r.. . . ' 1~ kit IT ..1 1--1 12 E-9 3 1~7~3' En' 1 112 1 Cir ' i /-3 - CIAH- 1| 1 0 -pre *!HÂ·r 124 7--1 r. Ill H' iIi , 1 1 p 1 11 499& 7' v i ' 1 ..Lm~ 1 1 1 li Â£ 1 1 lili 11 1 11 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 --.--- -. -, ....--Â·,-- ,2.9,- 1Â·Â·Â·Â·. -f,7Â·67 \A,Â¢:U,Â·r UtZ,SCâ‚¬ 146 1.-ZE [2Z-Â·289 AJ -:*00,0--4=- . -. --7 -41 A 111.1 U. Ellf-3 f r 4 -- T *2 # / PÂ»--~ 83 ! -----i- 12&01 â€ž 1 1 t N. !1 p06.34, I. [ U.. *37% 1-4 1 'ru= A .F 11-~-- -t==- ~- == , _fl-Jit-tilâ€ž1-Ilrlf.If.L__--__-' 1 /9 Le R ~ti 6~L- . _..fl. 1 ki ~-ft' 1-41\ .i Li i i 14 13-1 7-1 r 1111-1 7--- - ====== -4 -7-1 21[ 1 - I. 4 - . 0 :---=-2 Â«1 #j 3 ------- i X. i . ~-1 41 -r----- r - C ---f].Ii I.[IHIUILE ' iI ;'014 4 - 1 --i k><71 -L_1. =r i t. - k ---- nu - 4 A 1111...__- -e-- =Z - 9.4 1===2.- k. 1 .[03 - 11 =0=_-__ -111411]1-- f 1 ' rb W- 37+ , 1 1. - 1 f 1 ''----fl)CALi): 4 Q 94 [,r M eli- 1 . 1 j 2--1\ 94?A- 1 -1 0 1 11 .$ 1 1 0< W FL- 1- i ,I 1 7,*4 1 -1 /Â»1,1 1 1 / N 194*4 1 (,:90% 0337.4 (6 FLE) . 952> *-- 1 !/. 1 ! 11 1 - -4.- ----1- - -4 1.-.-6 IT#,- 131 1 3 = 1 1 4 9 luf 2-h il / :i f r..1.-Tt Â« -1 _ _ -rr- il! -Â· --1 111 1 1 1!; If / 1 1 1 11 1 1 1. 4 \ 11 1 . H EÂ«41 i i Lf- p .1 â‚¬ 10 , . 11 'fArr. ) u,j 82,5, 1,- Â£ lili 1 ' i 2 ! !1" 1 1! 11 22=7-4 I 11 1 1 6800; 1 , 111 j.-1 ' u_..1 11 '1 11 1 1 / M / 1 ------ ------Â· il.'-I 1 . tiAÂ«Â¥7 36 1 7- ~>.Â·Â·77 1 L.4- 0 29 . 2 -Â» WI- sT Poe# .(1 . h.:03 44'V 40 F J f . 4 4 f ' -- -- 1-4 1 1,1 1 1 , If, PS'@dA,/ k F'>EMA Nf ' // :r. 9*,A' t. 1 , 2 - - /9,0, . i + - - -nIZ-52-2 - -:\ 4*92Â«/- 7. 1 .-' .1 ki'J 1/ --4 : - .T.. ... .- - 11.1141 - 44 *rA.kIL :! 1 1. ilitild'Ir.1 1 |11't 1,!1 i~ f Â«;4<1 9- 1; I 1 1111.1 N tÂ»- -lill- - 1. 1 7 1 1 f 1 1 11 . 1; 9 :! , it i 1 , ; li 15 1 -raw e.to 1 , 1 .. , 1-- |_~ s. 6.Ara .5,(24.5 5 | r frÂ¢JIP | .,, 1, .1 '' .1 1 1 11 1 1 1 i It i, i I.- '1: i 21 - 1 , -1 1 513 1 1 Llf 1 1 +III d li .Abl/-9 1 Â·!/+iii ! TT.il 11 ---- 4 1 --4 1 : 16:.il..:' ! 1 ' -It[ 1 t-- 1 ''~f 'l'â€¢'11341 1 f V--1 1 11 1 1. 11 er. 'A'Â» #, 41- 5>) 13 INâ‚¬ 1 4 - - 2,4 V I N 1 2.1,1 1 1 511 t; 1 Nâ‚¬ - E.r'A 1 07- r EFF- 11 11 1 1 6$2 - i ; L . . - ----------54>' 4* . 4 A , 111 1 1 11 1 14 NELL, 111 1 ' f. 1 " 1 11 .W / I 11 /11 -_... -f 1 1 4'200 teD f~,278 BM) 4 i'2,01 1/jâ‚¬â‚¬T' Â·pletvhJOCSÂ· 1,\O,O 6 >fd NOWN Â· > â‚¬ 0 PEEl' 7122*91 - 11+EEE=C: 1- 1 ga 4 1 27.- - i /1 \\ 41 / / ! --1- 4 1 ./..< â€ž- ... -.-- 1--4--- 1 ' i I a 4 4 4114 4 4 4 1 |1 f . Ir #-2.--23=.LLE:2*--Â· i-l r--1 1 1-* 1 + E 1 -iF 1 1 7-11 m Â«3 1-1 1 _Si IT'F ----- - - 73 8 -, j * O 1 1 ~ 1-jin~-- " g -1- 11 11=. 5 e. 11 e L -9 4 - tiLLI 6 1 e 0 I -4 9 i -r> 3- E--1 i I 1 1 1 1 ' , I \00.0 *661* I --e. 'A/*l.4Â£- D 1 G I 1 'red'+ 5}44Â· 1 1 1.11 11 -I- Â·k-1 1-- ---- -r -- -- - --- -ip-- -I..-il- -Illp i- 1 1 , *.Ii -.. 1 11/' '11 L/r, wel. ~Â· T 0 11/,1 1.1 1 /1 - 11 lelaâ€ž 1 '1 11 , A I , i -..-' 19 :1'2. 1YE Itt 1 1 -/ 1 7 - / 1 / Â· 7 1 / 1 22. 0 VÂ«AL. 14_ 5721Â»Â·8Â·~*71 1 L .1 11 1 001* ~~ 1 1 19 1 Ill/E 1 1 1 13 lil 1. 1 /4- 4 1 1 0 11 0 12/ + 1 1 1 6=Â» ,-41 - D 11 H If ~1 kni,AAI f 1 1 '*'., \A, 11 4 1 . - 11=-et - 1 : 1 Â·*4 r,c. 8,5 kL... ~ 1 1 1% 1 1 / :i -0 011 Â©011 1 1 '1 1 1 .1 1 -,4 1 1 1 1 --1 ---- --- --- 4 -- 9 1 -rE AMP 2-62â€¢S'F 26 Â»4 I /2 9 4% er prsÂ». gi Â·s. 1 0 joÂ·00 <#J Â· Hez, A ----4 0 1 5 10 FEET 62,6 PGÂ·El' 'At W u. , ' Â·h, ' 1 :a ' , 1, Â· , .1.. 110 - 4~?fk '' 1 . 1 1 , EN{,11, 1 141,1 6. ,!ll i . 1. 1 1 , 17'.Pat 1'.+8 4. , 4 0 1 1 1 f 1 0.1 > I a SES I tÂ·'I ,Â· K . I . 1 -9 . 1 . I ri ' 04 - - 4 - 1 - 1 -Ifi-' ik. 1 74.t; 1 .1 4 - .4 11 1'. 1/1 - 1 Â·Â· 4---- Â· 0-1 - -0- 1 0 1 Pl \ I i'\ 0 1 /1 \ I l' .,\ \ g 1 . -1-4 .... /1 1 . 4- 1 -*I ---- -44 1 1 / . .r 1 I. I --)' 1 . I \ 1 1 0 0.-- 11 1 ....0 -/// . / 0/ T---ft / ' \ 1 1 /1\ 1. 1 / 1 ! 1 . 1 1 /1\1 1. .. , . 1 1 1 9 , - i . , .. a / \ 1 : ... 1 1 1 Â· , , .... 1 -0 - 1. -/ Ul IÂ·- --r \ 1, , , C I 0 1. . 1 1 / . \ ' | ---1 -- 1 -1- . 1 0/ \-/ ' '1 - S . / /1 . 4/ l[ 1 , 1 <-1 -----4---Ar - - - -, - Al I 1 . //1 \0 ..1 \ rilbl. . 1 .S. I-; 41 mil.-1- ---74 1 0 1 - - , i ]11 .-- L------- 1 1 .1 1 11 D ..1 1 1 1 1 11 1 L-Li Il 5 9 .1 &-1-------*- + , A f . 0 0 'b ' 44 1 1 + , 1 fit\4 1 . 1 â€¢tâ€¢ + ' t ' 11 ).41 , 0 1 1 1.-1 ...4~.Ii'>:14,3 . 1 1 . . 1 . , . . . r .. 1 i.t '4.9; '*1 1..1 t 1,#1''Fz ' . 1 . . .In : ''<''ii,mil)4,11' I ' 1,1 1.11 i.,,1 $ , :11..:if. 1 ~1 67Â¢, 1 4 . . , ..')1%13 . 4 - 1,9%2 Â·- 4 , 0 4 9/ .,0 . Â¢ 11/1 : . I . . . 2- . . ./1. 11. . A : , , *.. 4 f A A , . .'1 4 0 0 A LL.2-9 ALL-0 T --L ,. 1 -. 1 Rt' ' :i .. .1 1. . - 1 1 1 : . 27=/- 1 ' li - I I 'f 1 1 1 +1 1 :.995-, 1 -ikEESEEZZ i L .1 -1 i i , tz 1 , 1 04' 3711 liLi 11 t 1 1 ' 1 t . M. 285=+EL 11 1 11 AJ. 1 ~ 11 LOS 1 1 1 .- I '1 ! * I./.- 1 1Â· -4 ll-~-p , \ i ;, 1 1 . 1 L / 1 . 1 'Wl . /i . 1 . 4-1 1 EM.--Srok:p 1 i , 1 . .-1 1 R - 141-22- elsc- ,r~~NU. j - 1.-0- 34 j f====:~ i f ... .. 1 Fltr;f 0 -p\A -31* :l 1- - t . 0 . 1 1 . , -7 'i F%5385:~11 Ii-6-Ji 4ok *gu **p. - ---- L 1 1 i Edz,UNO Â¥10609 PLÂ·614 : . LPFM Pine 2-4. 1 / pâ‚¬.4â€¢K;C~9 n . Â¥*Â¥Nd{44 fta:Ft=4â‚¬0 72514 FWINAÂ¢ff "Lz97 3'(i#Q 0*C *602 FLÂ»41 123 WEST FRANCIS ._ i.:-- .1 JAKE: VICXERY ARCHMECrs *t,212 MAY 8.1995 SA. s .=,44=ti=a" . - r.â€¢ . 24 -'.........'. lili. I.-I....I ..I - I TE'Â¥Â£ C . . 4. - . f ... .. -----$4"37====~ ---CUB j,1 ~ltreWEr-UlÂ»-----Â·-----4 ~ I. r. I 1-,4.Ull '-- i | IE@\ 16 : Ilttl~~~~~1 F~?:~~~~~~~~~~~44; - 13.111 , il 111 1 - 1 - .1 .WEillit#Lut~Will-]ill'!1 11 1---- .. I - - . kwistill /// 3 .1.Wl::1111 1 . 1111EJM' 19014191 8 111In' 1 Mil dimilliES"mud~jilittitill.1111, , >-0-1 j- L.- 1 1 - 1,;11411:1 1 ...,Ri~ ~4.-- 1./.1, 311|- / 1 1 - . - !!97=lim~ Â®11111'mi,Ii#ImmH J*mwl'llitil!!EFU : - 1 *11]f;6111''I Ill L!;MI4 '1111~ 111 11 In In 1 lim 0. ... . wee-r *,aweita-1 - 47 4:;f#12 viatier] 04 . I - .. 1 1 -t__.L L_1_._Llili~ }â€¢EC~~~3 E~~~2,11Â£*2*figir- r- -. -- 0 16, i . I I -u'l 1.-C===="*:1+HIE*HÂ·++MLLillEt 1 111121 ..W-.--11'GIn'|11||till.J1J..j..1.JJ*.L.<LITIrMak,v---6.arr~~2nJA.ri.*li _ - FICIPX<xmX- -1 + 1 1 un / . 1 1 -1 . ..... I. I. . I r--I'll.-*/*I-/0.--I/..Il//-.-Il-.3~1 1&/1 ill Â£ = r 1 . 1,1 -- --I -14.6.-6...... - 111Â·., NÂ·lilli WU,i-Hlr[mI-TTTral r--'=11--I mitlill| 1=1 il.lili i i Illit~lqi~ill - .a i.'lli !1'i:i '!Il 4. IM 1 F~~.r~-~jilll! ill Illl-I[lill mill Il - Il ---- :11]131 Ill~ . 01- . 1 -1. . . 2. . . 0. I f -E?Â»1' I 13Â¤5Â»ri~i--1 1267Â»1 ELE,Â»-rÂ»1 I i =======================al . . .........==-===i======================~ -Â· 1902Â·vAlide FlemeED Off>*-6 4. ~ 14 WIEST FRANCE 4 JAKE VICKERY ARCHrIECTS 6 MAY 8,1995 m>v.*0 -MM A-,45 --- - 7 1 - . . m.>Sy Q - . U I. 1, U 1 1 ,6 lt.* 4 1 I - - (Â·I/44 -' .I' ! &4 , Â·- 11 1 1 1 It - - 1 e , - . 1 - .. 1 0 . T ! 1 et / 1 1 * w BM* i J eec=,1 a- 11== 1 - ,L ' 1 7 :i I 4 11 wie Il Il 1 .- FÂ»â€¢Ill.>f /UteCA - 1 /-- ill- Ivn- Â» 1. / 2/ \. 1 1 1 . I . 1./ 1 ' ... 1 ! 1 . ; -i, ~:F i I :h / 1 . 1 / 4 i 4 C.*--1. - - 11 --7 - i. leerrr - i . - Â·'t=M 4-1[- T 11 - 1.1 i - 4 - t. 11 , - 1 -t- . t 804005*'r 12,290 7141. 1 k. '2410#9 Fzo FeED FPED nt! M *4243 Fle/* 00,6* - " 1.Lir- 8- I ../ 123 WEST FRANCIS JAKE VICXERY ARCHrIECIS - MAY 8. 1995 Â· r =232(11===22 4-11~ - .Iiae.,@~me~522 1/*/1/lainti I ' - , - .- -Al 9 . . bH /1 .... * 1, 1 . 1 1 ..1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 Ill 1 1 f IR-i 11 -1 1 I -1 1 1 1 - f . 1 L-4-2 I. 1 1 ... 1 Ill , 1 1 1. 1 11 1/Â«-1.-4- 1. 1 1 11 1 1 1 r 1 '1 li=- L.-1 1 1 - - '4' 1 5, 1 ----P----t 1 1 i h 1 1 i |1- 1 ' 1 0.- 1. 1 1 p -i l 91471 -1 - 1 .- L 1 71\ 1 .1 -/. L b. . 1 Iii -:-1 1 1 &1 -7 - -ilt . # It-\: â€¢ 1 1 .: 1 1,l \ Â·,- l -- 1 1 1 . 1. . \1/. 1. 1.11\It 1 1 - . 1 1 1 7 1 " l 1' / 1, '>/f: -/ !i: 1 1 1 11 1 .1 / 1 1 / 1 . 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 hi' .1. . tr__i _ 7 ' -t-21 \I\ :It i 1 1 -7 ' 1 . 1 4-1 1 6 - ' lilli t . 1. / 1 1 . 1----1 11 1 1 1 -- 1 -I-- -- / \ 1 . 1 . 4 '1 1 / i 1 -- 1 / 1 ---- . . 1 / -1 -7 1 /\ / 4 ./ f // i s / - , .. -04 --- 0 . 1 /1 1 1 i 1 1 - . 1 , l . tz* I '21 . 14 j 1.- t. . i b 1 \ 1 .. 1 \ / 4 rr# 8.&44 -. 0 / 1 / . / - i. / 123 WEST FRANCIS - - r. - -4 - c-1 i JAKE VICKERY ARCHITECTS ~ - / MAY 8,1995 - - . %. / lo - - - 6 ORÂ«,au - 22 a Av.01*1 -de. -. lilli - r:-9Â£.---- -*- - . 0-1- a . af-t.ey-- f i Â·~ ~- louctv / - -.4-12/"....1 'S,â€¢- t..t.,aftit'E'"'""t -. - - 1---1 11,4 -: .-S+FOUX- ..--Â·h-: C.:an~ f *Br5*e,-+1. .ve 4 --- [2-â‚¬kul#~Dit~gt~1*Lk-1-~ A 61-69 1 ALLE,7 - t. -.i- ... .I...- , ---I---'Ill 1,1 .1 1 1 1 1 I ! 1 1 , q '11 . , 1 Â· 4 W*:1*22- - ; 1 11 1 i! ill l elf -- -1 *Pr/-1.1 1 1 T Z:lg. - 1 . A , - 1 11 1 t/-1 1 -1 -2222Â£-- : 8& 1 â€ž--1- 1 695'f j 1 1 k 1 1 1 1 ' ~ 1 r -8'Ef:=2 . , t. 1 - l ! -- .-I -- t Â· 1 1 / I h 1 , 1 1 1 - 42. â€žÂ· - 9 *cr. ,.. 1,2<1_ -rd 1 t 1 11-113,-il- \4 f - ''i . - 1 , . 1 1 OUTVTkid 02, 2 NO. Â· 1 7 ' :Â· i: , 1 ' i Al,r: Â·:rcu ' -- .. 1 - 1 . . . I.- 1 , 1 - I /1 H.Zle *t-H-Z~r ' ! Â· 1 ' 1!14.-J,[22 0, 1 '-- .. ' h.4 i i ' Â· , 1 1 i 1 -:63 1 1 4 -24 4 .-1 'MEE-ZI L_~_. , . 1 ! 1 1 1 - l - ' i 5-1 , i 1 - -1-- 1 1 t I 1 1 1 1 - 2 '412Clrâ€¢10 ywor. 84,4 . . - UPPEL FUO2. FLU). .. FJ. 92#1'64, 1 1. 82.,wet f;a;FDEEC) FEEW MINA*1 . 41,&92 Ft,1+16 "Lor B' 620) 123 WESr FRANCIS JAKE VIC]CERY ARCHYTECTS. efc-;U*5 -2. - -e-- Y MAY 8.1995 A.u, 4 1. , 1 1 1 , 1 ..1 1 1 0 i 1 1 - 1 1 11 1 -.If 1 : 1 -Al--- i 6 1 1 1 -1 : 1 -11,2- i SEGRI I -- 11 1 i 1 4* â€¢ *,UC.â€¢57 Tr li 1 - 1 : 43 11 i 31 ; - 1 , Wk .- & -- - 1 ~ -f L ~ 1. . 37 1 1 4 11<6Â£ L I 1 '1 1 Ir. Pt 11 - C RB'Le F;â€¢,MIL>r .Meot,k - i r -4 ... ! . :: 2,4/ S li 1 Â· 1 11- epig. 7 - 1 K i 1 ..+ :04 14 / . 29--7 4Â£ N 1 8.te,1 41,- L m N I I'll . 1 1 -t i 15040,1 ENT pu/2 &41. U. fe.,41 06 72/FOÂ¢ED Fpeunt'"P,1 ' 41 - Flag fLAN6 - " LOT- E ~3:1 . 123 WESr FRANCIS - JAKE VICKERY ARCHITECTS # e MAY 8.1995 . '..i-~ l: -6 -of- F . 7'7 12619.2-:evÂ«~...'- 36 =ge=z;n=i_ 14,- C./U.*P=/./01Ji ..1.~.& . . .. I - 1 -I . e. ... 1 . I. I. I---I"...'.-r,0 . 2 . I. . . I .: I . â‚¬71 . .... ..1 .. I .. . 11 111=" . 1 . -1- 1 . ) 1.24-----41~i: .0 . b.-.....â€ž1â€žâ€žt 1.â€¢.4-4- =1*%-r----' * A U>0611 Â· -Z 1111Â£1 1-== 1 1 251 4 1 2 1 ' ===lili mtnK.< -- I lilli ; 1 4 * 1 - - --1 - ' * --T-TF , EJUU_ ' : - 1,; li ; 1-Il-' . I- .- Â· Â· 'ill M1L61 41-1- ~~~__~_0 ~ ~ ~ | ~~~~ T*T TIu--- - ~ 4 1 1 ==r==Â¥1#1==Eir:2.*f'*%, Â· 21 %1* 1 - IA . 13111.97. ,/ ---Â· -1. 1 -4- f , _11'il[Ly -2241 tknh'ntivy Â· r I ~il 4-r~*~~~V . 1 -'. Â· , 1 . 1 1 - ~- - Egh-- . _. , ~-11111 ija=1 . 1 ~0~-*-I h . . .t . . :1 .1 4 =4 . 2==Et. 1-r-- -it b, Â· .- 13*44 3/1-,7*J 1 . 1 .r a- --1 . '. 1%91 tÂ» -- / 1 .. tz' - . j&L_-EEi '~~~~ 1 1, dll= . 1-â€¢Â· 1 .........$.6 1,. -- 1 -1 1 1. .7/\ 1 - ,-0- 1 1 , 0 It 1 4 - .. I .. 1 1 R 1 1,47 1 #*=1=ti , 1 I . ikidil U/r . - 1 -0 r'_1 -' :- Â· . 3~ | * Â·Â°Â° S % 0' 20 5% 1 - 1 8 -OW e N - -4 --1 rit , I<V,-, 1 4 .. I: I . SE %8 . 0 & --......-...............â€ž , : D W 1 1'. 1?â‚¬11 . hrjjâ€¢:,Â· 'Â· mim ~i"~bililimiÂ·: - 1-IOU-443--r# M-1-214:201 .. 5 1 -- . . . .1. 1 t . .- - . 1 . . . 1 Erâ€¢.rr- . .. .. .. '. I .4 . .. . .. DIVIEIGL- Â· 0 I . ... -... .. 2__Ja.tr'J/. 1 . 1 1 . . .b' .... *641'J , *1 . 45/Â¢r//A/, . 1 .1 ' . -- . 1 . . i , . - . ....---I.-- . 2. r) â€¢ ... : :01 .Â· . . 4. k..3 . I ---/I.I.-I-Ili-..Ill.0.-Il-.-I..I-..ill....Ill--0--I-I 1> 'Â·, V .2 4 . 1 . I . 1 . . 1 .. 1 .10 .1 1 - I.- I . 1 1 . . 1 44.1 . tr,, 41 1 . iÂ· ~/ i'..IMIÂ·I Â· Â·rÂ·Â·,â€¢Â· ulÂ· T 91 . 1. .... . -1 . 1. I 1 â€¢â€¢ .1 NX . . ./ 1 1 6 Â¢. ; ' I r I Â¢14 4 1 / /1 11 Â· 1 ,... r 11 1 . . I '2 K .11 , 1 Â· rr 4 131 er, . 1 12.-1 i , L----Ln,-2:4 ~. , :1==4 , 1 0 , .1 . . 1 V , -- I- Â· , ..lz!4&,E .. . 72; - -- 4,Â·i.Â· 4.' 0 1, .1 1 . . . ..... ., . ..,. I .. . . . 1 . Ji Â· Â· ' iW.' 4*PF#*P, I. . . 1 .â€ž ./ UN E ! I . 1 m. - Â· .1 . t 0 , . ... . . ./ .0 ..01 1 Â· Â· 01%* - 1 lillil ' 1 'A . 0 Â· 1 ./ -1- 1 1 .-. A â€¢ 0 . , I . t. 1 1 L . 1 0 4- ./ I 1, 1 1 Uppee. Fl.00/ fr '. t L ..6- - lor 1 . A 4. 1,9 , fÂ£*10014 b le, Â·-Â· Â·Â· 0/5 144./. . - 1. i 01 ., 113 -1 F - 1 f ~91 1 1 ,. . 1 - 1 1 I . , . . 1 4% V 1 1 4.1 L */ .. 1 . .... . . T Â· Â· . . 1 1 1 1 . I .t . 0 1 -Al . 1 1/ 1 1 2 633 4 . t..E- f 13Â£: T J 62 4,2Â£ - . h X r 0 C) 4 - , 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1 t.- --. EAL . 1 30 11 51 1 il -1- -- ---- 1 -1@ 1 r- '14 1 2 '14 1 1 4 er w *2 - - L'*1Â»01 ~ , (Ge TIEFIA ((/ R.A.4) 61*0iE 19)2, + 61 j ..7 i ck ----L,----- , #- (1 1 1 r .4. , 1 Uf i 1 94~ /561 h \\ -i_ Â· . 1 r i *JArrla 12 11 1 1 !& 1 11 4 1 7 FAnt jufÂ· Ega __ - e - j il i- 1 i 1, ~*64 j 11 1 i *' ;r- - 1 1 , H T , .1 i 1 1 / 1 b*:62#th@ U7- PZÂ»-13 LÂ¢ 2/6(L "1 ' Â· Ur * *u..0. /39 419:r fÂ»12% . 1 - 1- 1 1 F i 1/\O/0 G â‚¬43 1 9. i , 1 1 1 1 1 i' 1 ;f .. . a . . J 4/2 49. I. . - r 0 r , 4 11 1 1 1 1 , --*-I- . , , i 'l ST'(2AL j jl . .i \ A-=i , 1 4--a- --..*.4.1 . 1 1 ./ i, 1. 1 4 ' ' OF W Â¢>6,1/ - : AM,1 *NÂ®*{ 3 Â· 42 06!A ll' 8 pro % 1 150- te 9- 8 -1 f 1 1 -74 -IlkÂ·J L Er' I,= 1 . 1 ./..4-r 1 f 1 - I:/ Â·- 4-- ni 19&.-. 1 1 . 4 1 1 L-/ , ' 1-- 1 4Â«1 - 4 1 ' .. 1 :! I Le WE L.l- i 1 q- 1 i i '' 1 2 .1 1 1 -1- fâ€ž j 4.6,7 1 - - Be-9 '%/ /. fi / :i 1 CLOC*04 E*rw 3 1 1 I l 1 1 1 1, 4 be#ip MT Â»,Al LAÂ°< 2) EIL '~ 1 /39 0Â«ST f*10*4% 149,6,9 414,/ ' ' 1 . -2- it I 1 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 .U flu 1/* .1 7 1 1- 1 1 1 - =====Elli.--- r=Tz.Â£-4-#Â·392%19- T 10(4001 / - - ----- 1 1/ I / â‚¬ 47* A t)-r-- 1 Â»>F 1 1*/4 Lieâ‚¬,427' .- - -- . ..<ro- -~16 1 xy. 15/,2Fg#F:-2#'1:&.tti I, I I - /4 t \ 1. 1, 00 N i 0 9 2 . 7.--- 11 f 11 1 11 11!1 11211 j 11 L I; 11 '1 i' 211 $ : '| I d '~ 11 1 t' 11 "1 . r 4**44%_1&41;4b I .4 ~ 1'"4,1,1 :i' E 91 â€ž,1.11 i ii J 4 11 1 1 21 - 1 Al--9 r Z 1 1 f 9 1 117"011 1 ---.- * Lili e@1Â»-Â· | GLU" Â«FaIL ; r7:711 -/\ r , f 11 7 11 ' 1 * 10 1 -1 11 1 1 -W t[ 1 1 11 11 :1 1 ....-- - . F 2, lit 1 4 11 _ __- I 1 i-4 1 ---- 4* 4 1 i l ili i; 1 li 1 1 1 -111 [lilli 81 11!ift 1 11 1 Â«ULa) 131> | .All, ELEV#9013 ~ 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 111 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 Ill 1 1 i 1 1 + I i I Il -/- %4.-.I - E-----1-- -- HOMA â‚¬.LEÂ»*r 1Â¢44 - 3â‚¬fl _)*33*10-- Â¥40Â·46 \5 III-- ---7/1-5730--IMA----------------- 7--7 1 1 4 1 I , I.\. - ... --......----- '.-------'.r- ~..3.....".---~-~.----'..%.-r-.- - Â¥%. i.-#--i-il--- Ill--Ill-- ---- ..- .% *I * .*M / ---I .-.t%* *.'*.*W----I.----I-9.-1-+.*K-- ---'*Al---.*-*k-'I-- _ _ly argue - - 11 .ii i-- j i-ItirÂ·- /Ifi-1* -~L ) Ci 1!. 1, , 1 \ 1 0 / 1 /4 , - 1-, 1 1 C /0 '0~ 75 i / 0 b / /; 1, 1 1 11 4:Al ! 1 6 i 1 11 11 1 .1 1 lili - 1 i' f, ] 1 j 1 11 1 1 --7-r=ir I J 11 i f 2 F (31~'LE>(L I_4-__- = / 1/ 1/ .110 11 0 0 -% 1 1 1 /4. 4 , 8~0- E-9 1 1 ribi .1 . r.r - 445+46~ >05 /0 .... I fl\MEA .- 12141+T 4(*tr i ,|11 t 1 ! -HIll lili 1 111![ 1 1 1''i 1 , 1 gib-t//Al._ ru~ 1 4.0, t. ,~ .10 1 i J 11(1 1 7 1- - 1 /- 1 1 111 1 11 1 11 1 1 111 1 l 1 1 1 V 1 1! 1- I --1---------4-1 --- - - --- -- --.....+9...............Ii---gv-.---I.-.-I. - --- -,- 1 -ulÂ«grk.zÂ»*fÂ«EEL21*E~z~fÂ»Â«LIJAâ‚¬~ji--9*Le--u---~.IM~ Fear" - 01 6 - t . . . . 0 . 0 D , . , .. . f N-hv j -1 l i I I , \ i 4 1 - l i 1 . ve , En- -L -1 1!1 11 11 .\ 1.2 11 ! [illi --- -1-~-- 01111 ' 71-~Â·-i-1Â·-7 1 .-7 1 r======:9[1 L U 1 11 r 1 IlL__-_dll 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~F LF:111 1 i 1 1 , ./1 111 4 11 1 lili 11 F lilli Nul 1 1MT!-t BIlli.M" 111 J * 1 1 111 1 1 1111 1 19% 1 0 111 11 1.111.11 -my.- - 1 L '- - ,i 1 14 - Pi Billi, 1 1 11' li '1 111 1' t .1 1-1 11 11 1 ; / '1 1111111 . Ik 1 2/2 1 111 ilillill ill 11 ! 9 11- I i' 41, 1 41\1 i iii 1 11 it 1 1 11 11;.# 1 1 1111 -- 11 dll fl 0-*--I------: #- 1 M ji lilli 1 111!111 1 51 1,1 a jIT 1 A lilli 1 1 - 111 it :- il ~ lili 1 1 1 - 1 4111 1 11 ' ti \ 11 lillill lili 111 I 1* 11 - 1- 111 1 -1111111 Ri - ' 11 Ili'll lilli 11 - - - 1 1 ~1 11 11 1111 ; 1.- //1 & 1111 ~ I lili 1 I --. -- '41% li -1- 11 dill I li itillU k * ip 11. lilli 1 11\ 11 4 4 4 1 11 lilli' 1 1 1-2 ..7 -.--- -, . ==r =--- .... ----- -91% 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 ' x] Â«1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 - I~ -11 A k A 2 1 11 lili It 1 11 1 11 1 % 1 1 ' 1 1 r ; 11 H 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 li 41 Lit' 1 4 -di - 421 1-1- k 1 1 - 11 1* 4 11 1 4 4 1 141- L---3 1 1 11 1 1 4 4 11 1 - -Â· 4-0-4 litilli 1--- 1 1 0 - 1.- 1 4 1 1%=B 1 1 ... 1 1 L lilli 1~ - *404 1 1-- - ,~ -1 Il 11 1< 1 . --- - l' hi # 1 1 4 X S R m Â£ V -- il * '' 44 0 4 1 + t j 1 lilli 1 -- 47 117 - I lili 1 1 1 4. f A-__di 1 lili 1 L==L~Ul 'i~I l' I 1/II 4 1 11Â« 1 1111 -1 11 11 1 NN ~ 1 ; Â®_.--,-1111 1 1 1 X 1 1 L ~- 1 11 jix 4 4 4% I 1179-Hit 1 1 111 I ii ~ 1 k ===11. 1.. 1 111 1 ---1-, 1 11 lilli lili 111 1 4 - 4 -- 1 fl 11 11 i \ f St 1 1.1 4% It 1 l illi 1 1 11 1 Ill iii i' s 0 lt' 11 lili li 1 1 1 13 i Niu'll,1 -- d 1 1 1 6 I ll 1 11 l i l i 1 -- ------ 1 ' j 1 1 1 11 11 It 11 =-1 11 1 1 4 1 !1,1 Ill 1 1 -*-.111 1 4 6 11 1 1 1 01., ---...=411 1 1 1% 1~-SE-11 i lÂ· 1. / -- 1 ' lot .1. 4â€¢ .1 1 , It 2 A IL 1 <'-.. ~ 1 / 1 1 11 \ 1 2, 'f ' i \ 1 ./ -1 . Cl/ CU Nr I E L 1/ _ -1 I / 1 ~81Â£APÂ¥1/2+U 1 , 4 .- , 1 --4 - Itt - 1, ---3.--7Â¥Â»0,2[Zi-2=-. --3t=r=17 ~-1--.:3-t-4U-=t-_~+.2.L--====- ~. 7â€ž- /1\ 14. - t 1 , 1 1 - 1|! 1 1 1 1,1 1. 1 -r==11-2 - 1 1 1 0 1 9#NE 1 -L 1 1 MA.ff g ap i . X 1 1 - - Ff 1 \.. -- UffE K 91-00 A FLAN 11,9 \,i./6*f Flu-Nuls N 012-r H > 4---- 10 +661- 01 . . . 0 0 . . 4 4 4 4 CrEÂ¥862;14 u. yxÂ·' Cf Â£9064{941 . S \00.0 Â¥61,1 9/Al/12- 0 . 1'Â£#44 944. - 0 1, 11 1 I-- %--- -1 1 14. WELL 1 111/4 -3 P 1 4 10-01 1 1 I 1 "Er -!-f -0 ' 1 . T 1 1 1,2: 1 2 1*rE i i, I 1 1 T It 1 1 .. .- - 1 .. /1 1 1 r & -- 12861Â£- 211.16 -- - h '*-A+ * Peivt*'r/ A -1 1 \ t 6424 6 49*1,14.- 19,0.K-1,14 / /' 1 14 '1, 1 - 1 4- Â» 4- 4 : \ -9, \ 11 vit# 4 r // .6 20*14 01 S / 0 PI-, Â»Ve-LL- t- I 1 1 0- \ * .-t#,6.- <59-41, PUgh .l r I 1 0 t 0, 1 001 1 1,2-0 L 1 - - 1 1 I \ / 1 LfÂ·wful- 64; WELLÂ· 1 1, --- -5 . F 9 i -re *,4 0 12*Of lag we 4-r ers*~4 01 4 1, 10 0 00 ~IR) , N#Prl-1 .% \0 Â¥ser r. 1 4 t. ,. M. 4. . . . . 0 . . . I 62 .â‚¬ pe Ef ~777- . . . . . 0 . . % \3'. \ J,994 0\ 9 S G ~UE--3-U---ZE* 4 - HdoN 94~ Pool' L *582(024 10* M 104 1 ' Wht â‚¬ 2714 6 Â£10 035 , I , / .. 4.. .- . r-â€ž'- .- . .-. - .. / 1 1 47 14 , ' ' 47 ~il:S 110 -1-61 \\0'\ O, 4, 11 1-, 1 ? 2.v/f fâ‚¬ lili 1 1 0' 11 1 - 1 1 1 113(71 LE-1 - -ng M 114 ' 1 -------4- --- ---1 4[ 1 --~ 1 - . Â· 11 i, 1 1 1 2020 - 1 Eli 1 . 2/ - \ 743 =km, 1 1 41040 1 - 12 Wl bN '914 Wd b N l Arl -- -- ... . 1 - -i--,-- 1 4 PN/01(4 : 1 + APÂ¢M 42 P 141111 i I It t, 61'ON*34 1113(A , p ~ 0 # i i r- -WI- . I. / 1 ---41 1 1 . - 11 , 17 d'4Â«IMP ' 1 ~1 1 1 -- ' cin i . 0 ~4 I - -4 - 1 1 --- -- 1 12 053 1 1 - 1 _ 4*Il , 1,1 1 1 -4 j 11 1 -0 pas> 11 -- ---- -1- - -- 0 -alÂ¥Â» 2--973kÂ».-ij....* --------------Tlk- 1 I - 7-4 - f /084# 1/14(VI 91 11 814 19134& 1 r t 1 - 1 1 1 , 1 1.40 i /1/ 1 1 J . /1 i - 1 1 h C 3,1 0-3 -- -- -- - - I - - - - - I - $ I K 39 6 râ‚¬k ..C - VICKERY HISTORIC LOT SPLIT CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT HAROLD QUAM, VERINICA M. SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT OWNERS OF CERTAIN LAND IN THE CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, MARTIN, CARROLL QUAM, AND LORRIE CRUMLEY BEING THE 1--10 COLORADO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: OF --Â·------- THE EAST ONE-HALF OF LOT B, AND ALL OF LOTS C,D AND E, BLOCK 56, THE EAST ONE-HALF OF LOT B AND ALL OF LOTS C D AND E, BLOCK 56, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. 0 10 20 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF' ASPEN, PITKIN COUN~TY COLORADO . N . CONTAINING 10,500 SO. FT â€¢/- (0.241 ACRES) 8, VIC*RpHIST~3Ur/9-IT HAVE BY THESE PRESENTS. LAID OUT, PLATTED THE SAME INTO L TS A ND => D- 2,_LyÂ« OWNER,/Â¥22*#07 q. 4&4& - O.,gR. 'HARgLD QUAH VERQUCA21. MARTIN OWNER: 67)0 L<. DKL~~ 0 OWNER: Ca.u-SL r CARROLL GUAM LORR I E CRU~-Al / )SS - STATE OF (10[iÂ¢Or#Â¢44 Â£ THE BOREGO I NG I NSIRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGE BEFORE THIS SNL DAY OF CITY MONUMENT NW , 4-10 n 1 , 19.4 BY HAROLD QUAM CORNER BLOCK 49 ...1.re/ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 0 ER 4rf ELY CTS WAS LE AWD LL ON THE 996 ED 1 , il ; i ASPEN, SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 1. V J 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET . . ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ' PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 ER:*%9,~ 1 - - DATE JOB BASED UPON Ally DEFECT IN â„¢13 PLAT DE CONENCED MORE T,Wl TEN 2/Nii,Ir,rair,pgurlit.6 =',tem .ne I ..A 2/96 25 I 07A tURVEYOR, ' . '' ,~,*fh ~ ~ ~ " 0 I- - -1 . 0 . â€¢ ./ 0.126 .., 0 0 1 1 : 0 . A D , .. . 1 4 1 0 .0 1 1. . . 0 ... 4 D . 9..'..I- .. I . 4 . I D . h ,, ..... . 1 - V ).4 : a , 1 , ... : 0 ... 1 . 1 0 , I 0..:. . a .ji#/7..49 , 61"=9144 0 - : Â· i .4 .. / -1--- 0 14/ k . .. 1 .. ..: 0 1 . . .. 1: 0 .... 1 D .4 4 1 1 . 1 , : e. D 0 1 '. 1*gi& 1 ... 6 ' / 4 Â¥â‚¬1=Â¢2â‚¬Em . .- : 1 '. .- ". 0. . 0 1, . ID , D '. . 0 . B , . 0 1 . .. . , 0:. , 1 . 1 ... . 0 0 , , ... mi . . . 1 .1 . . . 0 . 1 . - 1 - , . 0 0 0 1. 0 1 1 D . e :1~41 .t , D . D D . D 1 0 - -51 0 ... I. .. 1 , 44..4 , . D , 0. . 0 /1., . 4. . , . . . 1 . - , . 1 . 0 . 10 1, e 1 11 ' 1 .:. I . 1 g 1 1. 0 . ... . 1 1/1 : 1. 0 1: 0 . D - ' . 4. ' 0 1 . .. . 1 D ..... I â€¢ 1 ' 1 ' I â€¢ I - ' Â· D , CÂ· ' . 0 1 I Â· C , .: . . : 1 1 . 0 0 0 .. 1 1 . 0 . 0 .1 I I . 1. ' . 0 . ----213~~ , . . 46(194/WIT/THS<' 0 0 I . ... : I . 1. .... .â„¢.0,5 . 1. . It I . 0 . I. 0 1 0. I. . 0 0 . ...0 . .1 . S. I 0 Do. .... 1 . D .. W . . I. D. . 7.. ..... D 1. 0 - .. ... . D. ..D . I . ... . , . 1 ..... . 1 . 1 0 ... 1 1 042/.h Â« - . I . 0 ..