Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout!coa.lu.hp.605 W Bleeker St. 0035.2012.AHPC 40 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0035.2012.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 12 4 44 003 PROJECTS ADDRESS 605 W BLEEKER, ASPEN, CO 81611 PLANNER JUSTIN BARKER CASE DESCRIPTION HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE POSS ARCHITECTURE +PLANNING DATE OF FINAL ACTION 03/18/2013 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 9/26/13 RECEPTION#: 597903, 03/21/2013 a. 11:25:44 AM, 1 OF 2, R $16.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION(HPC) GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 605 W. SLEEKER STREET, LOT A,SMALL AND LARGE FRIES SUBDIVISION,BLOCK 24, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION#6,SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-44-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, 605 W. Blecker LLC, represented by Poss Architecture and Planning, requested HPC Conceptual Major Development and Variance approval for the property located at 605 W. Bleeker Street, Lot A, Small and Large Fries Subdivision, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing .to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS,the HPC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C.La, Variances. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, Justin Barker, in his staff report to HPC dated March 13, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 13, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 3 to 2. 605 W. Bleeker HPC Resolution 46, Series of 2013 Page 1 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Conceptual Major Development and Variance approval for the property located at 605 W. Bleeker Street with the following conditions: 1. The setbacks granted in HPC Resolution#40, Series of 1999 are reapproved. 2. Remove the proposed porch on the front of the historic house. 3. Reduce the upper deck size to be completely hidden behind the historic roof. 4. The historic house has non-historic shutters installed. Staff and applicant are in agreement that they shall be removed. 5. Restudy the massing of the stairs to the master bedroom and relationship to the connecting element. 6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1)year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty(30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 13th day of March, 2013. Ann Mullins,Chair " Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: i Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 605 W. Bleeker HPC Resolution#6, Series of 2013 Page 2 of 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 2013 Chairperson, Ann Mullins called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Nora Berko, Willis Pember, Patrick Sagal and Jay Maytin. Excused were Jane Hills, Sallie Golden and Jamie McLeod Staff present: Deborah Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy City Clerk Justin Barker, Planner Willis will recuse himself on 110 W. Main and 612 W. Main 110 W. Main — Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design, Demolition, Public Amenity Amy said property is 27,000 square feet and expands from Main Street to Bleeker Street. It is zoned mixed use on the front half of the property and R6 on the rear half and lodge preservation overlay. As the development goes through the entire property will be mixed use. It is partially in the historic district. After HPC they go to P&Z and council for a PUD review. The front 1/3 of the property most of the existing development is remaining. The only real change is a canopy element over the front which is appropriate. In the middle third they are adding an additional story for lodge units but within the 28 foot height limit. Staff's comments have been focused on the residential development along Bleeker in the back. The rear has four new units. The 4 units are 32 feet high and they have been pushed apart a little to make them have a residential feel. Amy said perhaps the flat roof is not in keeping with the neighborhood. There are three Victorians next to this site. At the edge of the property we still would like to see some revision to the mass even if it made the buildings taller. At the last hearing we had a lot of discussion about the different departments and those issues have been addressed and at this time HPC doesn't have to be concerned with them. They are reducing their public amenity by 830 square feet and they are talking about improvements along the Garmisch parking area. They are also proposing an outside dining area. Staff recommends continuation. Stan Clauson Associates and Poss Architecture and Planning — Kim Weil Stan said council said protecting small lodges is important and a goal. You have a project before you to enhance its existing lodge development. This commission is charged with Historic Main Street that extends to Bleeker 1 0*11 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 2013 Street. You have a project before you to enhance its existing lodge development and create 54 lodge units that are among the smallest in the city. Normally you wouldn't have any charge on Bleeker Street. This is a LP overlay with a PUD. This project needs some spirit of compromise to move it forward. The outstanding issues from the last meeting sewer line, size of units, accessibility, trash, affordable housing and size of units, all have been resolved. What we have done to emphasize the separation is increase the distance between the buildings. Engineering has asked that we go to parallel parking on a portion of the street. We have tried to create architectural quality and is a compliment to the neighborhood. The roof design changed and front massing has more identity between the units. We have moved the entrances slightly and provided open railings which reduce the visual mass and height of the walls. We reduced the amount of stone and provided more wood siding to give a residential feel. Kim Weil said they also reduced the amount of fenestration that faces the street. We also removed columns to open up the corner and kept the mass toward the center. There is nothing that precludes a flat roof in the West End anywhere. Materials, patterns and textures are consistent and a grade above the palates and textures that are found in that area. We feel this enhances the residential element. Kim Weil said the roof lines have been adjusted in an attempt to modulate the 4 units. The landscape plan offers dining off Main Street. Stan said in all we need to focus on compromise and jurisdiction. We are getting 54 units out of this project and with careful capitalization can move forward. Roof gabling would add overall height and massing. Nora said she feels we are getting close. The eastern building shifted 3 '/2 feet east. On Bleeker you did not move toward the north or the alley. Only the eastern building was moved. Kim said there is ten feet apart on the buildings and then it is cantilevered over. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13. 2013 Nora said our charge is still to preserve scale and mass in the neighborhood and is there room for compromise to have the buildings can come down four feet. It is big on that block. Stan said it is two stories on all sides and the third floor provides the square footage that makes for the development to work. You can't have a six foot high third story. We are considerable less than the amount of free market development associated with a lodge preservation project of this type. Patrick asked about a garden level for the four units. Kim said the ramping doesn't allow us to go lower etc. Stan said if you were walking along the sidewalk you would only see a two story. Chairperson, Ann Mullins opened the public comment portion of the agenda item. Ed Walkabee, owner of 121 W. Bleeker. Our house is next to the proposed structure. The West End is to be preserved and we need to do the best we can to do that. All of the three houses are 1888 vintage and our setbacks are the same with large yards. We paid 4.2 million and put in 675 thousand. Our house stands out and it is a showcase. The mass we are dealing with is a tremendous width and square and 32 feet high. The square shape does not fit the West End. Next door the historic houses have a height of 24 or 25 feet. I object to what the new structures will look like. The commission's charge is to preserve the historic feeling of Aspen. Julie Ann Steele — Exhibit II — e-mail. The height should fall under the R-6 guidelines as two story residences. The proposal is not in keeping with the historic buildings. Our living area height is 24 to 25 feet and the height to the ridge is 31 feet. Aaron Brown said he and his brother Michael own the Hotel Aspen and Molly Gibson. We always knew this was going to be a compromise. There is the issue of preserving the lodge and the architecture of the free market units. We have 45 rooms with affordable housing. We wanted more affordable rooms. This lodge will last another 30 years and this is what we thought the city wanted, smaller and more affordable rooms. We have underground parking and 9 more rooms and rebuilding 30 rooms and has a 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 2013 new public amenity, has affordable house and it is paying all its fees. We feel this is a great balance and compromise between the city's policy and our desire to build these lodge rooms. We are delivering the 54 rooms and consistent with the city and we are being pushed back on the free market. Without the third story there is no development. It doesn't work economically as we don't have the funds for these rooms. We need the free market in order to make the project work. Ann closed the public comment portion of the agenda item. Height mass scale Trash, sewer has been approved by city staff Public amenity Cash-in-lieu demolition Jay said they are close to the same square footage if there were two single family houses. Nora said she is stuck and understands the small lodge issue and the economics of it. My charge is preservation of the West End and this feels incompatible. We have to respect the integrity of the West end and at the same time applaud small lodges. Jay said we are in this because of the Main Street District and small lodges. If the two lots were sold there could be something else built that could be worse. This corner can handle these buildings because Garmisch Street is very wide and can handle it. We will end up with a great little lodge in the Historic Main Street District. The building is being preserved and they are preserving what is there and bringing it up to current energy codes etc. I can support the project. I would ask you to consider ten feet off Bleeker Street just because of the front setbacks on the 1800 Victorians next door. Patrick said we are close. Mass and scale should be changed a little bit. If they took the square footage away of the restaurant and moved rooms into that and kept the residential and changed that around a little bit that might work. To me it is the revision of a roof forms so it appears residential than commercial. 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 2013 Ann said she hasn't seen that much change in the massing and it is superficial. It is primarily a residential area except for Main Street. We need to be preserving residential. Stan said the buildings have changed. The Hotel Aspen owners have tried to make this into something that is acceptable. Aspen can be considered the West End but it is also home to lodges and tourism and we always have needed to maintain some kind of balance. Lodge preservation was enacted based on the concept of having small lodges that have adjacency to residential districts need to be allowed reasonable development. We are being quite consistent and the neighbor did move next to the lodge with expansion potential. We need to think of Aspen and protect lodging facilities. Your charge is to protect the Main Street Historic District and it just happens that it extends into Bleeker Street. If these owners were not able to do the kind of lodge expansion they could do a lodge contraction and build single family development or sell the property which would allow for flat roofs. The issue seems to be revolving around gable roofs. Aaron Brown said everyone makes good points. If you want us to go and make changes there is no road map from this meeting of what those changes should be for an approval because everyone has different concerns. There is nothing said from the HPC about going higher which staff mentioned. Stan said this needs more approvals down the road. Ann said what she is hearing from the board is that it is too big. MOTION: Ann moved to continue until April 24th' Motion fails for lack of a second. MOTION: Jay made the motion to approve 110 W. Main. Motion fails for lack of a second. Jay said all the discussion is on these two houses and nothing on the lodge. The lodge is going to be beautiful. Preserving this lodge is where we should be focusing. This commission should believe in the Main Street Historic District. The renditions of this project have changed for the better. There is a park across the street and a school nearby. There is also a doctor's office directly across the street and we have a chance to help this project. 5 001 P00% ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 2013 MOTION: Jay made the motion to approve the project as proposed, approving height, mass and scale, demolition, cash in lieu and the representation that the fire, utilities etc. is as represented. Motion fails for lack of a second. MOTION: Patrick move to continue the application and restudy the roof form only. Motion fails for lack of a second. MOTION: Ann moved to continue 110 W. Main to April 24th to restudy height, scale, mass and proportion; motion second by Patrick. Motion carried 3-1. Vote: Patrick, yes; Jay, no; Nora, yes; Ann, yes. 605 E. Bleeker— Conceptual Major Development and Setback Variances — Public Hearing Debbie said the public notice is in order and the applicant can proceed. Affidavit of posting Exhibit I Willis was seated. Justin said currently on the site there is an historic miners cottage along with a non-historic 1999 rear two story addition between the two. The applicant would like to remodel that rear addition and the connecting element as well as renovation the interior of the historic building and adding a front porch to the historic building. The non-historic addition had received variance approvals for the side and rear yard setbacks. The proposal is looking to reuse the same foundations from that rear addition so they need the variances re-approved for this project. Staff is recommending those be reapproved. On the rear addition the massing is similar to what exists and the dimensions will be the same. They are proposing a gabled roof. The height would increase by 2'3" inches for the new addition but within the height limitations for the district. On the connection element the dimensions are less than the ten feet minimum that is required by the guidelines. This is mainly due to a glass enclosed staircase that juts off the addition and down on top of the connector. Staff feels that this is still achieving the intent of the guideline. Also for the connector there is a private patio proposed on top of the connecting element and most of the mass will be on the west side and hidden from view from the street but there is a portion that will be visible. Staff is recommending that the size of the patio be reduced so that it is completely hidden. The connector should only be used as access to the 6 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 2013 patio. There is no evidence that a porch ever existed. When the addition was done in 1999 there was a condition that no elements be added to the historic house that didn't previously exist. HPC needs to decide if they want to stick with the original condition or go with the guidelines which suggest adding a porch. If a porch is added staff recommends a variance from the residential design guideline to be less than six feet in depth. Overall staff is recommending approval with the following conditions: That the original setbacks are granted and approved. Remove the proposed porch from the front. If HPC approves the porch a variance is be granted from the required 6 feet. Removal of the non-historic shutters. The previous variances granted were a 2.3 foot west side yard. They are providing 2.7. A 3 foot variance for the light well that is on the west side of the property. On the east side yard there is a one foot reduction. Keith Howell, architect Kim Weil, Poss Architects The context is mostly single family houses and one large hotel on the corner of Main and 5th Street. The house is noted as a Harold Ross house. In 1888 it was a single gabled structure and in 1890 a cross gable was added which is a separate building. In 1952 a third building was purchased and then added to the property and in 1983 Guss Hallam did a remodel and added a back porch. He also added a 2 x 6 framing around the house. In 1999 the house was renovated and picked up and moved to a different part of the site when an historic lot split was done on the property. There are numerous large pine and aspen trees on the site. We feel the carriage house design is not historically accurate. It loses the clarity of what is historic over time. To the house we would like to use a similar form to the addition but contrast the materials between old and new to clearly show what is original and what has been added to the property. In the basement there are bedrooms and a media room and we are keeping the same layout. In the main level the back wall was lost in the 1999 addition. We are basically opening up the main level with a big kitchen/dining area. We are enlarging the garage and adding a mud room and moving the office from the upper level to the main level. On the upper level we are moving t he office and replacing it with a master bedroom. On the upper level there is a connection to the deck. On the roof level we are taking away the shed roof that was the connector between the original house and the new addition. We are replacing that with a flat roof to better define the separation between the two elements. We are creating a glass gasket to separate the old from new. The existing house has been 7 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 201 added onto three times. We are proposing to add a porch to bring the house back to look more historic of its time period. The guidelines encourage porches. The current massing to the ridge is 26.3 and we are 3'3 1/2" under the current height limit for this zone district. Ann said it is 2.3 feet higher than existing. Chairperson, Ann Mullins opened the public comment section of the agenda item. Georgia Hanson, Aspen Historical Society said we have had a lot of construction on Bleeker for months at a time. We have not been able to get people into the museum without climbing around trucks etc. This summer we are celebrating out 501h and we have a big event going on in July. We need to maintain the neighborhood serenity while the event is going on. Exhibit II — 605 W. Bleeker—neighbor—They are concerned that the height of 2'3" is going to block their views to Aspen Mountain from their property so they had their architect draw up a few images of what it might look like which was attached. Chairperson, Ann Mullins closed the public comment section of the agenda item. Issues: Porch Mass scale height proportion Any previous variance approvals Ann said there wasn't a porch there and I wouldn't put one on so you don't have to deal with the residential design guidelines. This is a great project changing it from a carriage house to what it actually is. The only thing that bothers me is the staircase. If the connector is 8 feet that is fine but once you put that on top of it the way it is designed now it looks a little bit disjointed and it defeats the purpose of having a connector. Jay said the staircase and gasket concern me. I am concerned about the light pollution. I get the entire reason for the light in the stairwell but you are drawing attention to that. I am opposed to the porch because it didn't exist. 8 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 2013 Nora said the connector overpowers the historic resource. Patrick also agreed that the porch is not appropriate. The staircase and gasket are a concern. I also feel the patio size should be reduced and completely hidden. Willis said the scope of the project is well done and well presented. I don't disagree with the porch and can approve the variances. I have no issue with the height. 7'6" is about as low as you can go, I do not feel it our purview to analyze the light spread and it is only going back into the body of the site plan. It doesn't really go to the street. The connector is fine and there might be some opportunity to adjust the setback of the stairwell. It is great that the shutters are coming off. All in all it looks like a cool project. Amy pointed out that this is mass and scale and you are not approving materials. Ann said the mass of the stairwell enclosure detracts. Jay said the side porch and the walkway to the side door to the street is confusing. You have two sidewalks that go to the street. In the spirit of preservation I would ask you to remove the sidewalk on the side yard so we have a more distinct look of the house from the front. My concern is the size of the stairwell and how it takes away from the connector. The gasket is confusing because you have two different materials. Ann asked if they were proposing a hot tub on top of the connector. Keith said the current iteration has a hot tub but we believe it will be going away for structural issues. We can move the furniture back behind the ridge. We are at the deck limit and we still have to have a railing for code.-We tried to make it as transparent as possible. Kim said he heard that the piece that is the stairway is maybe a little too big but I didn't hear the location was a problem. What if the roof followed the stair. Ann said according to the guidelines you need to define the connector and anything that overhangs is taking away from that. 9 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 2013 Kim said the front door is on the north side with no cover. It is a difficult situation to get into this house. The snow falls off the roof and piles up in front of the door. Possibly the board can consider that. There is also heat tape on the roof. Because of the trees it doesn't get the early morning sun as it comes around. Keith said in terms of the stair if we can reduce the front face of the stair and make it go back farther from the connector which would make it less present. Nora said she wants to see a connector a connector and not question what it is. MOTION: Patrick moved to continue to April 24th for review of the connector; second by Jay. Vote: Patrick, yes; Jay,yes; Ann, no; Nora, no; Willis, no. Motion failed 3-2. Willis said if you had a minimal connection and the porch could be handled in a contemporary way. MOTION: Nora moved to approve resolution #6 and that the connector be a connector. Stair piece to be restudied. Motion second by Willis. Amy said they could bring in another design for the porch at final. VOTE: Willis, yes; Ann, yes; Nora, yes; Patrick, no; Jay, no. Motion carried 3-2. 612 W. Main Street Worksession — no minute Debbie stated that this is a no binding worksession. The applicant acknowledged that this worksession is non-binding and you can't rely on anything. This meeting is for direction only. MOTION: Ann moved to adjourn; second by Patrick. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. 1114,r Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 10 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Justin Barker, City Planner RE: 605 W. Bleeker Street- Conceptual Major Development and Setback Variances, Public Hearing DATE: March 13, 2013 SUMMARY: 605 W. Bleeker Street is a landmark designated' 4,500 square foot lot that contains a remodeled miner's cottage style home and a 1999 non-historic rear addition. The property was created as a result of a Historic Landmark k � Lot Split. The applicant requests HPC approval to remodel the rear pP addition and connecting element, renovate the interior of the historic house, and add a front porch to the historic house. The new program is not increasing floor area. The existing development received HPC approval for side and rear yard setback variances in 1999. Though the new proposal will be using the same foundations, the variances were specific to the existing construction. HPC reapproval of the variances is needed. APPLICANT: David & Meg Roth, 605 W. Bleeker St., represented by Poss Architecture + Planning. ADDRESS: 605 W. Bleeker Street (121 N. Fifth Street), Lot A, Small and Large Fries Subdivision, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-87001. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential). CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is 1 transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structures) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Conceptual review focuses on the height, scale, massing and proportions of a proposal. The relevant design guidelines are attached as "Exhibit A." Overall, staff is in support of the project. The application packet clearly relates the existing and proposed development. Staff appreciates the effort to clearly define the historic structure, while respecting the context of the neighborhood in scale and form of the building. The subject property was created through a Historic Landmark Lot Split approved by City Council in 1999. The historic structure was then temporarily lifted on the lot and a new addition was constructed to the rear of the cottage. Currently there is a one-story historic structure and a gable roof two-story addition with a connecting element between them. The proposal before HPC is to remodel the rear addition and connecting element, renovate the interior of the historic structure, and add a front porch to the historic structure. Previous Approvals The applicant is proposing to use the existing foundations for the new construction. The existing structure received variances for the side and rear yard setbacks from HPC as part of the development approval in 1999. The variances were found necessary to place the bulk of the new construction as far back from the historic house as possible, and to accommodate the width of the existing structure. These variances were specific to the approved development and will need reapproval from HPC for the new proposal. The setback variances approved were: 7' combined front and rear yard setback(no longer required by the zoning district) 2.3' west sideyard setback reduction(2.7' provided) 3' west sideyard setback reduction for lightwell (2' provided) 1' east sideyard setback reduction(4' provided) 3.3' combined sideyard setback reduction(67 provided) 2 In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. The new development is a remodel that will be using the existing foundations and does not need the variances changed from what was originally approved. The approved setback variances have not shown to be problematic and staff is in support of reapproving the variances for the new development. Massing and Proportions A gable roof form is proposed for the addition, similar to the existing structure, and a flat roof for the connecting element. Gable roofs are the most common roof type in the surrounding area. The gable roof helps reduce the overall massing of the addition and maintains the similar form to the existing and surrounding structures. The flat roof helps create a more distinct separation between the historic structure and the proposed addition. Staff finds the roof types and massing are appropriate for the development and are compliant with the following guidelines: 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. • A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. • An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also in inappropriate. • An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. • An addition that covers historically significant features in inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. Height and Scale In the R-6 zoning district, the maximum height is 25 feet. The Land Use Code height calculation for a roof pitch greater than 7:12 measures the height at the 1/3 point between the eave and ridge. Using this method, the proposed height is considered about 21.5 feet and does not require a variance. While there is no restriction on ridge height,the proposed height for the addition is 26 feet to the top of the gable, which is 2 feet higher than the existing addition. The proposed 1-story connector is less than the 10 feet minimum required by the guidelines, due to a glass enclosed staircase attached to the side of the addition main mass. Requiring the connector to 3 be 10 feet would either make the second story space an impractical size or require new foundations on the south to allow for usable spaces. Staff believes the proposed connector still achieves the intent of the guideline by providing adequate separation between the historic structure and new addition. Staff finds that the height and scale of the proposed development are almost identical to what currently exists and compliant with the following guidelines: 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street. ❑ Some roof lines and porch eaves on historic buildings in the area may align at approximately the same height. An addition should not be placed in a location where these relationships would be altered or obscured. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. ❑ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. • A 1-story connector is preferred. • The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. ❑ The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. er- r � x � X v ¢ � r. x F 9 9 ; 3 Front of historic house �., 1, , A porch is proposed for the front of the historic house,shown above left, as part of the application. - There is no evidence that a porch ever existed on the structure as seen on the historic map, shown above right. A condition for approval of the existing addition stated that no elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. The Historic Preservation Guidelines strongly encourage residential buildings to have a front porch that is simple and similar in character to those found on comparable buildings. Staff believes that although residential porches are encouraged by the Guidelines, it was previously discouraged by HPC and is not historically accurate for this building. HPC should determine whether it is more important to maintain historical accuracy or remain consistent with the Guidelines. 4 The Residential Design Guidelines require a front porch of at least 50 square feet and 6 feet in depth. A porch 6 feet deep would extend beyond the front of the house and appear oversized. If HPC determines the porch should be added, staff recommends a variance from the 6 feet requirement to comply with the following guidelines: Porch Replacement 5.5 If porch replacement is necessary, reconstruct it to match the original in form and detail. ❑ Use materials that appear similar to the original. ❑ While matching original materials is preferred, when detailed correctly and painted appropriately, alternative materials may be considered. ❑ Where no evidence of the appearance of the historic porch exists, a new porch may be considered that is similar in character to those found on comparable buildings. Keep the style and form simple. Also, avoid applying decorative elements that are not known to have been used on the house or others like it. ❑ When constructing a new porch, its depth should be in scale with the building. ❑ The scale of porch columns also should be similar to that of the trimwork. ❑ The height of the railing and the spacing of balusters should appear similar to those used historically as well. On top of the connecting element the applicant is proposing a private patio. The patio is located on the west portion of the roof and is surrounded by frosted glass railing, barely visible from only Fifth Street. The majority of the patio will be hidden behind the historic roof structure, though a small portion is on top of the 1-story connector. The visual impact could be reduced by requiring the usable patio to be completely behind the historic roof and only allowing access across the connector. The historic structure will only require minor roof modifications to accommodate water runoff, none of which will be seen from the street. Staff recommends reducing the patio size to be completely hidden and otherwise finds it compliant with the following guidelines: 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building. ❑ An addition should not overhang the lower floors of a historic building in the front or on the side. ❑ Dormers should be subordinate to the overall roof mass and should be in scale with historic ones on similar historic structures. ❑ Dormers should be located below the primary structure's ridgeline, usually by at least one foot. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. ❑ This will help preserve the original profile of the historically significant building as seen from the street. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. ❑ If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. ❑ Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. 5 The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant Conceptual Major Development and Variance approval with the following conditions: 1. The setbacks granted in HPC Resolution#40, Series of 1999 are reapproved. 2. Remove the proposed porch on the front of the historic house. - 3. -If HPC approves the porch, a variance is granted from the required depth of six (6) feet. 4. Reduce the patio size to be completely hidden behind the historic roof. 5. The historic house has non-historic shutters installed. Staff and applicant are in agreement that they should be removed. 6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. Exhibits: A. Relevant Guidelines B. Application Exhibit A 26.410.040.D.I. Street oriented entrance and principal window. b) A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six (6') feet, shall be part of the front facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than One (1) story in height. Treatment of Porches 5.4 The use of a porch on a residential building in a single-family context is strongly encouraged. ❑ This also applies to large, multifamily structures. There should be at least one primary entrance and should be identified with a porch or entry element, Porch Replacement 5.5 If porch replacement is necessary, reconstruct it to match the original in form and detail. ❑ Use materials that appear similar to the original. ❑ While matching original materials is preferred, when detailed correctly and painted appropriately, alternative materials may be considered. ❑ Where no evidence of the appearance of the historic porch exists, a new porch may be considered that is similar in character to those found on comparable buildings. Keep the style and form simple. 6 Also, avoid applying decorative elements that are not known to have been used on the house or others like it. ❑ When constructing a new porch, its depth should be in scale with the building. ❑ The scale of porch columns also should be similar to that of the trimwork. ❑ The height of the railing and the spacing of balusters should appear similar to those used historically as well. Treatment of Roofs 7.4 A new chimney should be the same scale as those used historically. ❑ A new chimney should reflect the width and height of those used historically. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys,even if they are made non-functional. 7.6 When planning a rooftop addition, preserve the overall appearance of the original roof. ❑ An addition should not interrupt the original ridgeline. New Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. • A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. • An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also in inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features in inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street. ❑ Some roof lines and porch eaves on historic buildings in the area may align at approximately the same height. An addition should not be placed in a location where these relationships would be altered or obscured. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. ❑ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. ❑ A 1-story connector is preferred. ❑ The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. ❑ The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. ❑ Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. ❑ Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. ❑ Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. 7 ❑ Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. ❑ Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. ❑ For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. ❑ The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. Rooftop Additions 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building. ❑ An addition should not overhang the lower floors of a historic building in the front or on the side. ❑ Dormers should be subordinate to the overall roof mass and should be in scale with historic ones on similar historic structures. ❑ Dormers should be located below the primary structure's ridgeline, usually by at least one foot. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. ❑ This will help preserve the original profile of the historically significant building as seen from the street. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. ❑ If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. o Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 605 W. BLEEKER STREET,LOT A, SMALL AND LARGE FRIES SUBDIVISION,BLOCK 24, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION#_, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-44-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, 605 W. Bleeker LLC, represented by Poss Architecture and Planning, requested HPC Major Development (Conceptual) and Variance approval for the property located at 605 W. Bleeker Street, Lot A, Small and Large Fries Subdivision, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS,the HPC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C.La, Variances. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, Justin Barker, in his staff report to HPC dated March 13, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 13, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of_to 605 W. Bleeker HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2013 Page 1 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants HPC Major Development (Conceptual) and Variance approval for the property located at 605 W. Bleeker Street with the following conditions: 1. The setbacks granted in HPC Resolution#40, Series of 1999 are reapproved. 2. Remove the proposed porch on the front of the historic house. 3. If HPC approves the porch, a variance is granted from the required depth of six (6) feet. 4. Reduce the patio size to be completely hidden behind the historic roof. 5. The historic house has non-historic shutters installed. Staff and applicant are in agreement that they should be removed. 6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 13th day of March, 2013. Ann Mullins, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 605 W. Bleeker HPC Resolution #_, Series of 2013 Page 2 of 2 pOSS /11�C1�1 f[_{;11J(ZL (?L/INIVING 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t)970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 MEMORANDUM TO: Amy Guthrie City of Aspen HPC Czar CC: File FROM: Keith How le Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning,P.C. DATE: February 18,2012 RE: Roth Remodel HPC Application ❑ ENCLOSURE 121 North 5th Street Aspen,Colorado, 81611 Dear Amy, Please find enclosed the conceptual HPC application for 121 North 5th street.This development sits on a corner lot at the juncture of 5th and West Bleeker. Because of this condition, this development is listed in the City of Aspen Building Department as 605 West Bleeker. Per HPC instructions,we have included 1 copy of the following: Attachment 1: Signed fee agreement Attachment 2: Applicants signed letter of representation Attachment 3: Current Certificate of title insurance Attachment 4: Pre-application conference summary+ HPC Land Use Application Attachment 5: Copy of HPC Ordinance 27, (Series of 1999) and HPC prior approval for the property We are providing you with 10 copies of the following: Attachment 6: Written description of the proposed development Attachment 7: 8-1/2"x 11"vicinity map locating the parcel within the city of Aspen Attachment 8: List of property owners within 300'for public hearing. Attachment 9: Wet Stamped Site improvement survey by Aspen Survey Engineers Attachment 10: Graphic Description of proposed development If there are additional materials required, please contact me at 925.4755 x 284. Please send me the Public Notice at your convenience so that we may post. Respectfully submitted, e� Keith Howie Authorized representative for 605 West Bleeker LLC. poss 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PROJECT Roth Residence Remodel JOB# 22024.00 DATE February 19,2013 E-MAIL khowie@billposs.com TO Amy Guthrie,HPC Czaress FROM Keith Howie Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. ATTACHMENTS Items and Cover BY HAND (IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL ATTACHMENTS,CALL IMMEDIATELY) DESCRIPTION (1)HPC Conceptual design application-Full Version (9)HPC Conceptual Design Application-short version as requested by HPC COMMENTS If additional info is required-please call @ 925.4755 x 284 ACTION For Your Use CC File COMMUNITY OP r Agreement to Pay Application Fees Ana reement between the City of Aspen. "Cif and Property Phone No,:970,925.4755-Keith Howie, Kim Well Owner("f"): 605 West Bleaker LLC. Email kh egbll)poss com kwe€I@billposs.com Address of 605 West Bleaker Billing Poss Architecture+ Planning Property: Aspen, Colorado,81611 Address: 605 E,Main Street (subject of (send bills here) Aspen, Colorado,81611 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees Is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. l understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services Indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ fiat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand (fiat because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, It Is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that It Is Impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient Information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid In full. The City and I understand and agree that Invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an Invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood,and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following Initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an applioatlon complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $_ B.-____ __deposit for. $1,890 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$315 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time.Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Pr e Chris Bandon Community Development Director Name: David Roth for 605 West Bleaker LLC. city use: Title: Authorized Agent Fees Due:$ Recslved:$ November,2011 Ci(y of Aspen 13# 1)920-5090 a POSS December 6, 2012 Atny Guthrie City ofAspen Historical Preservation Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen,Colorado,81611 Re;Letter of representation,Roth Remodel-605 Weft'8leeker Street,Aspen,Colorado Dear Amy, Please accept this letter as my permission to alloiv the following; Kim Well+Keith Howle+other representatives of Poss Architecture+Planning 605 Past Main Street Aspen,Colorado,81611 970,0254755 To act on my behalf for the above referenced project.The property in question is described as follows: Lot A Small and large Pries Subdivision, According to the Plat recorded December 15, 1999 In plat-book 52 at page 19 ParcellDO 273512487001 Sincerely, DI ev David Roth 605 West Bleeker LLC 201 N.Mill Street,#203 Aspen,Colorado,81611 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN,CO 81611 (t)9701925.4755 (1)9701920-2950 Yl AVAILIPOSSAM x PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. i 601 E. HOPKINS, THIRD FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925.1766/970-925.6627 FAX TOLL FREE 877-2173168 VIIIRING,INSTRUCTIQNS.FOR ALL TRANSACTIONS_R�GARDING. M CL©% QF THIS FILIr, ARF ASFOLLOWS: ALPINE BANK-ASPEN 600 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN,CO. 81611 ABA ROUTING NO. 102103407 FOR CREDIT TO: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., ESCROW ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NO, 2021 012 333 REFERENCE:PCT23447W31605 W BLEEKER, LLC ANMR. ICAN LATSM TFITZ ASSOC?fA 10-yl , COB VRTBleNT 66-1 7-46 NVEWCOR LAND U4M MURANCE COMPANY COX04T k ENT FOR s ROME OFFICE 201 N.New Yo-k-Avoul:e.&dte 204 , Winter Park.Fl=ida mss j � 'eleplxoxie :AQ':)629-5842 i Z-1 •Pitkin County Title, Inc. Privacy Policy We collect nonpublic Information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you, such as your name, address, telephone number, or social security number; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others. We receive this information from your lender, attorney, real estate broker, etc.; and Information from public records We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about our customers or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law. We restrict access to nonpublib personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information to provide the products or services requested by you or your lender. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that company with appropriate federal and state regulations, Notice of)Q&acy,Policy, of Westeor Land Title Insurance Company Westcor Land Title Insumnee Company("WLTIC")values its customers and is committed to protecting the privacy of personal information,In keeping with that philosophy,Nye,have developed a Privacy Policy,set out below,that will ensure the continued protection of your nonpublio personal information and Inform you about the measures WLTIC takes to safeguard that information. Who Is Covered We provide our Nvaey Policy to each customer when they purchase an WLTIC title Insurance policy.Generally,this means that the Privacy Policy is provided to the customer at the closing ofthereat estate transaction, Information Collected In the normal course of buslness and to provide the necessary services to our customers,we may obtain nonpublic personal information directly from the customer,from customer-related transactions,or from third parties such as our title insurance agents,lenders,appraisers,surveyors or other similar entities, Access to Information Access to all nonpublic personal information Is limited to those employees who have a need to know in order to perform their Jobs.These employees include,but are not limited to,those in departments such as legal,underwriting,claims administration and accounting. Information Sharing Qenerally,WLTIC does riot share nonpublic personal information that it collects with anyone other than Its policy issuing agents as needed to complete the real estate settlement services and Issue its title Insurance policy as requested by the consumer.WLTIC may share nonpublic personal Information as permitted by law with entities with whom WLTIC has a ,point marketing agreement,Sntlties with whom WLTIC has a joint marketing agreement have agreed to protect the privacy of our oustomer's nonpublic personal information by utilizing similar precautions and security measures as WLTIC uses to protect this information and to use the Information for lawful purposes.WLTIC,however,may share Information as required by la%v in response to a subpoena,to a government regulatory agency or to prevent fraud. InfoImation Seoul'Ity WLTIC,at all times,strives to maintain the confidentiality and Integrity of the personal information in its possession and has instituted measures to guard against its unauthorized access.We maintain physical,electronic and procedural safeguards in compliance with federal standards to protect that information. The 11VUIC Privacy Policy can also be found on WMIC's website at}vr rv.tiltfc v ,co211. ALTA Commitment For Tide Insurance VvE:s'TCC>Fz LAND TI'T'Li_ INSUt2ANcrx CompANY AUTHORIZED AGENT: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. 3W FLOOR ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970925-1766-PHONE 970-925.6627-FAX 877-217.3168-TOLL FREE E-MAIL ADDRESS: TITLE MATTERS; CLOSING MATTERS: Tom Twitchell (tomt@sopris.net) TJ Davis - (tjd @sopris.net) Joy Higens - 0oy@sopr1s.net) Issued By WESTCOFti LAND'dtM INSU9A M COHMO Home Office: 20f N.Now York Avenue,Sulte200 WlnferPark,FL 32789 Telephone(407)629.6842 WIESTOOR LAND Tim Insumot coMPAw ALTA Commit►nent Form(6-17-06) COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE S ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WestcorLand Title Insurance Company, a Cal forrria Cotporalton,("Company'),fo)•a valuable consider ation, hereby commits to issue Its policy or poltetes of title insurance, as r'denttfied in Schedule A, In favor ofthe Proposed Insured named In Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements;all subject to the provisions ofScheduleA and and to the Conditions of this Commlonent. This Commitment shall he effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy orpolicies committedfor have been inserted in Scheduled hereof by the Company, All liability and obligations under this Commitment shall cease and terminate within six (6) months qfler•the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall Issue, whichever first occurs,provided that the fallure to issue such policy or policies Is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHERW,OF, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused Its col por ate nafne and seal to be hereunto affixed and thesepresents to be signed to facsimile under authority of its by-kays on the date shown in Schedule A, Issued By: WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY y�, t3y. A Awts r �1rIEtsL��� �[uuJ Secrc►nry Countersigned: Authorized Signature CO 1045** Pitkin County Title,Ina, 601,8.Hopkins#3 Aspen,CO 81611 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1, Tile term "mortgage",when used herein,shall include deed of trust,trust deed or other security instrument. 2. If the Proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect,lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof,and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company Is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge.If the Proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien or encumbrance, adverse olalm Or other matte, the Company at Its option may amend Schedule E of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Comnxltment shall be only to the named Proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or(c)to acquire or create the estate or interest 'or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Scheduled.for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions fiom Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the Proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title.Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the rnoitgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment, S. The polloy lobe Issued aotitaitts an arbitrallon elattse. All arbitrable matters when llte Amount of lusurance is$2,000,000.00 of less shall be arbitrated at the optlorr of ellher the Con pa»y or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of theparnes. You stay ravlew a copy of the arbttratlon rides at htlp;lAyipmalto.org. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: April 23,2012 at 8:00 AM Case No.PCT23447W3 2. Policy or Policies to be Issued: (a)ALTA Owner's Policy-(8/17106) Amount$3,700,000.00 Premium$6,495.00 Proposed Insured: Rate:Standard 605 W RLEEKER,LLC (b)ALTA Loan Policy-(6/17106) Amount$2,775,000.00 Premium$126.00 Proposed Insured: Rate:Companion BANK OF AMERICA,N.A.,ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS,AS THEIR INTEREST MAY APPEAR (c)ALTA Loan Policy-(6/17/06) Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to In this Commitment Is at the effective date hereof vested in: RANDALL A.WHITMAN 4. The land referred to In this Commitment Is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOT A, SMALL AND LARGE FRIES SUBDIVISION,according to the plat recorded December 16, 1999 In Plat Book 62 at Page 19. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE,INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E.HOPKINS,ASPEN,CO.61611 This Commitment Is Invalid 070.925-1766 Phone/970.925.6627 Fax unless the Insuring 877-217.3188 Toll Free Provisions and Schedules AUTI4ORIZ&0 AGENT A and B are attached. Countersigned: SCHEDULE B•SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be compiled with:. ITEM (a)Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be Insured, ITEM (b)Proper Instfument(s)creating the estate or Interest to be Insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wil; 1. Copy of the Registration duly stamped by the Secretary of State of the State of evidencing registration of 605 W SLEEKER,LLO and Statement of Authority and a copy of the Operating Agreement of 605 W BLEEKER,LLC evidencing the names and addresses of the Members and/or Managers authorized to act on behalf of said Limited Liability Company, 2. Duly executed and acknowledged peed, From :RANDALL A.WHITMAN To :605 W SLEEKER,LLC 3. Deed of Trust from:605 W BLEEKER,LLC to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKiN for the use of :THE LUNDER TO BE INSURED HEREUNDER to secure :$2,776,000.00 4. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20(Series of 1979)and Ordlnance No. 13(Series of 9890)has been paid or exempted, b. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor(s).(This Instrument Is not required to be recorded) 6. Completion of Form DR 9083 regarding the withholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property In the State of Colorado, (This Instrument Is not required to be recorded) 7. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale,Notice to County Assessor as required by W.B. 9288 has been complied with.(This Instrument is not required to be recorded,but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office In the County in which the property is situated) SCHEDULE S SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be Issued will contoln exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements,or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies,conflicts in boundary lines,shortage In area,encroachments,any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,Imposed by law and not shown by the public records. S. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,If any,created,first appearing In the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for value the estate or Interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable;and any tax,special assessment,charge or lien Imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 69 at Page 361 providing as follows:"That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold,silver,cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 8. Terms,conditions,provisions,obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission recorded September 13, 1999 as Reception No.436419 as Resolution No.33, Series of 1999. 9. Terms,conditions,provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth In Resolution of the Aspen Historlo Preservation Commission recorded September 13,1990 as Reception No,436424 as Resolution No,39, Series of 1999. f 10. Terms,conditions,provisions,obligations and all matters as set forth In Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission recorded October 7, 1999 as Reception No.436337 as Resolution No.40, Series of 1999. 11. Terms,conditions,provisions and obligations as set forth in Revocable Encroachment License recorded June 6,2000 as Reception No.443696. 12. Easements,rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded December 16, 1999 In Flat Book 62 at Page 19. 13. Terms,conditions,provisions,obligations and ail matters as set forth In Ordinance No.99-27,Series of 1999 by Aspen City Council recorded October 6,2000 as Reception No.447704. 14. Terms,conditions,provisions and obligations as set forth In Agreement recorded October 6,2000 as Reception No.447706, 16. Terms,conditions,provisions and obligatlons as set forth in Encroachment Agreement recorded October 23,2006 as Reception No.630143• i6. Encroachments of fence lines and concrete driveway as shown on Improvement Survey prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers,ino.dated 04/12 as Job 29116F. ENDORSEMENT SCHEDULE FOR LENDERS POLICY FIM N0:PCT23447W3 OORROWER,605 W BLEEKER,LLO The following endorsements will be Issued in connection with the Policy to be Issued hereunder as referenced above; Form: $ Form: $ Form: $ Form: $ Form: $ Upon compliance with the requirements set forth below,the following exceptions will be deleted from the final title policy. The fee for deleting exceptions 1 thru 3 is$60.00. The fee for deleting exception 4 Is$90.00 for Residenilal Property and$25.00 for Commercial Property. Exception plumber 6 wtli be deleted upon recordation of the documents called for on the Requirement Page. Exception Number 6 will be amended to read:Taxes for the current year not yet due or payable,upon evidence satisfactory that the Taxes for prior years have been paid in full. NOTE:A satisfactory affidavit and agreement Indemnifying the Company against unflied mechanic`s and materialmens Ilens,executed by the borrower and any additional parties deemed necessary by the Company.The company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event addtlonal facts regarding development,construction or other building or work are disclosed to the company that may fall within any Ilan period as defined In the Statues of the State of Colorado,and may result in additional premiums and/or fees for such coverage and any additional requirements deemed necessary by the Company. The Company hereby reserves the right to deny any of the above coverage's at its sole discretion. ENDORSEMENT SCHEDULE FOR OWNERS POLICY ATTACHED TO AND BECOMING A PART OF CASE NO: PCT23447W3 SELLER: RANDALLA.WHITMAN 13UYER: 606 W BLEEKER,LLC The following endorsements will be issued in connection with the Policy to be issued hereunder as referenced above: ENDORSEMENT& For a fee of:$ For a fee of:$ For a fee of:$ For a fee of.$ For a fee of,$ Upon compliance with the requirements set forth below,the following exceptions wlli be deleted from the final policy. The fee for deleting exceptions 1 thru 3 with the Issuance of Form 430 is$50.00 The'fee for deleting exception A Is$10.00 for Residential Property and$26.00 for Commercial Property. Exception Number 5 Is automatically deleted upon recordation of the documents called for on the requirement page of this commitment. Exception Number 6 will be amended to read:Taxes for the current year not yet due or payable,upon evidence satisfactory that the Taxes for the prior year(s)have been paid. NOTE:A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indernnifying the Company against unfiled mechanic's and materialmena liens,executed by the seller and any additional parties deemed necessary by the Company.The company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event additional facts regarding development,construction or other building or work are disclosed to the company that may fall within any lien period as defined in the Statues of the State of Colorado,and may result in additional premiums and/or fees for such coverage. NOTE:A current survey,certified by a Registered Colorado Land Surveyor must be delivered to,approved and retained by the Company for Deletion of Printed Exception No.3.(NOT REQUiRErD FOR CONDOMINIUM OR TOWNHOME UNITS) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES The Owner's Polley to be Issued,If any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1)The Deed of Trust,If any,required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2)Water rights,claims ar title to water.(NOTE:THIS EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) Pursuant to insurance Regulation 89-2 NOTE:Each title entity shall notify In writing every prospective Insured in an owner's title Insurance policy for a single family residence(including a condominium or townhouse unit)(1)of that title entity's general requirements for file deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens,except when said coverage or insurance Is extended to the Insured under the terms of the policy.A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons Indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. upon receipt of these Items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request,Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further Information. Notwithstanding the foregoing,nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to Impose any requirement upon any title Insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. NOTE:If the Company conducts the owners or loan closing under circumstances where It is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction,the Company will be(teemed to have provided"Gap Coverage". Pursuant to Senate 1311181 14(CRS 10-11-122) (a)The Subject Real Property may be located In a Special Taxing District; (b)A Certificate of Taxes Due Ilsting each taxing Jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (c)information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners,the County Cleric and Recorder,or the County Assessor. NOTE:A tax Certificate or other appropriate research will be ordered from the County Treasurer/Assessor by the Company and the costs thereof charged to the proposed Insured unless written Instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Polley anticipated by this Commitment. Pursuant to House Sill 011088(CRS 10-11.123) If Schedule B of your commitment for an Owner's Title Polley reflects an exception for mineral Interests or leases,pursuant to CRS 10.11-123(HS 01-1088),this is to advise: (a)There is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed,leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oft,gas,other minerals or geothermal energy In the property and (b)That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owners' permission. NOTE:The policy(s)of Insurance may contain a clause permitting arbitration of claims at the request of either the Insured or the Company.Upon request,file Company will provide a copy of this clause and the accompanying arbitration rules prior to the closing of the transaction, NOTICE REGARDING CONSTRUCTION FINANCING:If it is not disclosed to the company that the loan to be insured hereunder is in fact a construction loan,any coverage given under the final policy regarding mechanic or materialmen's liens shall be deemed void and of no effect. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Guthrie, 970.429.2758 DATE: 11.6.12 PROJECT: 121 N. f=ifth Street REPRESENTATIVE: Keith Howie, Poss Architecture and Planning DESCRIPTION: 121 N. Fifth Street is a designated landmark located in the R-6 Zone District. The lot, which is 4,500 square feet in size, was created through a Historic Landmark Lot Split approved by City Council Ordinance #27, Series of 1999. Total floor area for the property is 2,339 square feet. There are no bonuses available to increase that limit. In 2000, an addition was constructed behind the historic building. The applicant would like to remodel/replace the addition. If more than 40% of the existing structure is demolished by the project, affordable housing mitigation will be required for reconstruction. Design review will be according to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Residential Design Standards. The review is a two step process, with a Conceptual application (mass, site plan, etc.) and a Final application (materials, landscape, lighting.) Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.415.070.D Major Development 26.415.080 Demolition of designated historic properties 26.415.110 Benefits 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710 R-6 Zone District Land Use Code: http•//www aspenpitkin com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ HPC Design Guidelines: http://www aspenpitkin com/Departments/Community-Development/Historic-Preservation/Historic- Properties/ HPC application: http•//www aspenpitkin com/Portals/O/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and°/`20Fees/2011%20Historic%2 OLand%20Use%20App%20Form.pdf Review by: Staff for completeness, HPC for determination of approval Public Hearing: Yes, at Conceptual and Final. Referral Agencies: None. Planning Fees: $1,890 for 6 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $315 per hour) Referral Agency Fees: None. Total Deposit: $1,890. To apply, please submit: ❑ Signed fee agreement, with payment. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ 10 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. ❑ An 8 112" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. ❑ List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing • Copies of prior approvals. • Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. r elr�O"On- 4, ATTACHMENT 2-Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: > Location: (Indicate street address,lot&block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) APPLICANT' Name: %/ `E? +• Address: Phone#: — •••7100 Fax#: D-~ -• -mail: Q%d 6 O REPRESENTATIVE: Name: i Address: dr;:7 + F�.�•N N 11�tl1 Phone#: Fax#: P E-mail: fowl� D p�twPaf�. � TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ Historic Designation ❑ Relocation(temporary,on ❑ Certificate of No Negative Effect ❑ or off site) ❑ Certificate of Appropriateness ❑ Demolition(total ❑ -Minor Historic Development demolition) -Major Historic Development ❑ Historic Landmark Lot Split ❑ -Conceptual Historic Development ❑ -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc.) &evo 'ATrAg:�fl&t7 J. PROPOSAL: (description of pro osed buildings,uses,modifications,etc. Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along►kith your application. This information will help its r eview your plans and if necessag, coorclinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO ❑ Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction,remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? ❑ Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? ❑ Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? ❑ X Li addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit,are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for-Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? ❑ X If yes,are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction With this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not,) ❑ X If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: N&Wr ❑Rehabilitation Loan Fund ❑ Conservation Easement Program ❑Dimensional Variances ❑ Increased Density ❑Historic Landmark Lot Split ❑Waiver of Park Dedication Fees ❑ Conditional Uses ❑Exemption from Growth Management Quota System ❑Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 x ATTACHMENT 3- Dimensional Requirements Form (Item 410 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Applicant: I m!& ft n1#4491110 Project Location: krg w00T pyC 4 4• Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes.Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: AR- Proposed: - Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed%of demolition: DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: E.xis tit ig. 10 L"lloivable:&Ft•oposed.••�tl�. He, i�ht Principal BIdg.: Existing: ��lAllotiwable:_, � Propose& Accessory Bldg.: Existing:! Allowable: Proposed: , �� t On-Site parking: Existing: Required.•_ Proposed •Site coverage: Existing: Required: NA Proposed: •Open Space: Existing: �y�t' Required: d• _Propose Front Setback: Existing: J% ' .Required• 16) Proposed:I3• 1 Rear Setback: Existing: ILkVRequired.^ d r Proposed: ' } Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N,S,E,W&ile�Exisiing. Required _ J Proposed.•OW Side Setback: Cam) Existing: ?i pll Required: Proposed.• Z itJ �_ _ '` Side-Setback: (+� Existing: .� , Regrdred:�}%j Proposed: �_��.�__-_ Combined Sides":' Existing:*2Required. "PI. •3} Distance between Existing: ­& Required: 'Vr Proposed AP" buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: rhc IVFM Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): �p New Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 VP • t ORDINANCE No.27 (SERIES Or 1999) AN ORDINANCE OF THE'ASPtN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SUBDIVISION Li XENIPTION FOR AN HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT AT 121 N.FIF T14 STREET,LOTS G,H,AND I, BLOCK 24,CITY AND TO'4'4tNSITE Or, ASPEN WHEREAS)pursuant to Sections 26.88.030(A)(2)and(5)and 26.72.010(G)of the Municipal Code,an Historic Landmark Lot Split is a subdivision exemption subject to review and approval by City Council after obtaining a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Conunissiotk:(hereinafter HPC); and ,WHEREAS,the applicant,Small and Large Pries,LLC,has requested to split the 9,000 square foot parcel to create ttvo separate single-family reside:�tial Iots of 4,500 square feet each; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 26.72.010(Q)of the Municipal Code,the UPC reviewed the request for the historic lot split at a properly noticed public hearing on June 23, 1999 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS,the Community Development Department has reviewed tine application and reconuncaded approval of the Historic,Landmark Lot Split,.with conditions;mud WHEREAS,the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the subdivision exemption under the applicable provisions of Chapters 26.72,26.88,and 26.100 of the Municipal Code as identified herein,has reviewed and considered those recommendations made by the Community Development Department,and the Historic Preservation Cozumission,.and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and WIIEREAS,the City Comicil finds that the Historic Landmark Lot Split,with conditions,meets or exceeds all applicable development standards of the above referenced Municipal Code sections; and WHEREAS,the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary . for the public health,safety and welfare. NOW,THE'REIi ORE,DE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY.OF ASPEN,COLORADO,THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to Sections 26.88.030(A)(2) and.(5), Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e), and Section 26.72.010(0) of the Municipal Code, and subject to those conditions of ' t p e 1 approval as specified herein, the City Council finds as follows in regard to the subdivision exemption: 1.. The applicant's submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and evaluation for approval;and 2. -The subdivision exemption is consistent with the purposes of subdivision as outlined in Section 26.88.010 of the Municipal Code,which purposes include: assist in the orderly and efficient developmennt of the City; ensure the proper distribution of development; encourage the well-planned subdivision of land by establishing standards for the design of a subdivision; improve land records and survey monuments by establishing standards for surveys and plats; coordinate the construction of public facilities with the need for public facilities; safeguard the innterests of the public and the subdivider and provide consumer protection for the purchaser; and,promote the health,safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen. Section 2: Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1,above,the City Council does hereby grant an Historic Landmark Lot Split subdivision exemption for 121 N. Fifth Street with the following conditions: 1. A subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be, reviewed and approved by the Connmunnity Development and Engineering Departments and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder within one hundred eighty(180) days of final approval by City Council.-Failure to record the plat and subdivision exemption'agreement within the specified time limit shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. As a minimum,the subdivision plat shall: a. Meet the requirements of Section 26.88.040(D)(1)(a) and (D)(2)(a) of,the Aspen Municipal Code; b. Contain a plat note stating that development of Lot B shall be required to mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(c)of the Municipal Code; c. Contain a plat note stating that the lots contained therein shall be prohibited from applying for further subdivision and any development of the lots will comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code iri effect at the time of application; d. The two lots created by this lot split shall have a total allowable base FAR,on both lots combined, equal -to 4,580 square feet of floor area prior to' consideration of potentially applicable lot area reductions (i.e., slopes, access t easements, etc.).- The applicant shall verify with the City Zoning officer the total allowable FAR on each lot,taking into account any and all applicable lot area reductions.. The property shall be subdivided into two parcels, Lots A and B, each 4,500 square feet in size. Provided it is found by the Zoning offmcex that no lot area reductions are required, the maximum allowable FAR on Lot A will be 2,339 s.£ (including a 500 square foot floor area bonus) and 2,241 square feet of floor area on Lot B.. The information verified by the City Zoning officer shall be included on the plat,as a plat note; e, Contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements of time R-6 zone district,except the variances approved by the HPC. f. That Lots A and B are designated historic landmarks and must receive HPC approval for all development in accordance with Section 26.72 of the Municipal Code,as well at Section 26.58,the"Residential Design Standards." 2. As a minimumn, the subdivision exemption agreement shall include the elements outlined in Section 26.88.050 of the Aspen Municipal Code, and shall meet the recording and timing requirements described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(e). 3, Eneronehments - At the time of redevelopment, the encroachments must be xernoved fiom the public right-of-way,relocated,or licensed. 4. Sidewallc,Curb and Gutter -The site is located in the West End where sidewalks are excluded from being built at this time. However the"Pedestrian Walkway and Bikeway System Plan"does indicate that there should be pedestrian usable space off of the street surface. Therefore,the plat needs to indicate a five foot wide pedestrian usable space located 7.5' fx'om the pioperty line and with a five foot buffer for snow storage. Any curb and gutter sections in need of replacement must be replaced prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The applicant needs.to sign a sidewalk construction agreement, and pay recording fees,prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for new construction. 5. Site Drainage The existing City storm drainage infrastructure system does not have additional capacity to convey increased storm xumoff. The site development approvals must include the r9quirement of meeting runoff design standards of the Land Use Code at Sec. 26.88.040.C.4.f and a requirement that the building permit application include a drainage mitigation plan(24"x36 size plan sheet or on the lot grading plan)and a report signed and stamped by an engineer registered in the State of Colorado,submitted as part of the building and site plan, as well as a-temporary sediment control and containment plan for the construction phase. if drywells are an acceptable solution for site drainag provided with e, a soils report must be percolation test to verify the feasibility of this type system. Drywalls may not be Placed within utility easements. The foundation drainage system should be separate from storm drainage,must be detained on site,and must be shown on drainage plans prior to permit drawings. These requirements must be met prior to acceptance of a building permit application. 6. Work in the Public flight-of`ya -Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant must receive approval from city engineering(920-5080) for design of improvements, including landscaping, within public rights-of-way, parks department (9205120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbanco, and streets department(920-5130).for mailboxes,street and alley cuts,and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights- of way fibin the city community development department. 7. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings with the HPC and City Council sl;all be adhered to and shall be 'considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by HPC or City Council. 8. That the construction of a new single-family dwelling on Lot 13 created through this Historic Landmark Lot: Split pursuant to section 26.88.030(A)(5) shall be exempted by the Cozinnunity Development Director from residential Growth Management allocations and shall not be deducted from the pool of annual development allotments or from the metro area development ceilings, in accordance with Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e).. Section•3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of tills ordinance is for ally reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the rem' aining portions thereof. Section 4: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue .of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided,and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: A,public hearing on the Ordinance-was held on the 12th day of July, 1999 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers,Aspen City Hall,*Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which Bearing a public notice of the same was published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. 1 INTRODUCED, PXI AD AND ORDERED PUBLTSRI<D as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 28th day'of June, 1999. Rachel E. Richards,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S.Koch, City Cleric APPROVED AS TO FORM: John Worcester,City Attorney NPALLX,adopted,passed and approved this 12th day of July, 1999. Rachel E, Richards,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S.Koch, City Cleric { oak _( Poftmwjr Pp . i t RESOLUTION Or THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION A.PPR.OVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT,PARTIAL DEMOLITION,ON-SITE RELOCATION,RESIDENTIAL,DESIGN REVJEW AND VARIANCES TO REMODEL A HISTORIC HOUSE AT 121 N.111P'TH STREET,CITY AND,TOWNSITE OIi'ASPEN,COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. ,SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Small and Large Fries, LLC, represented by Mary Holley, has requested final, approval, partial demolition, on-site relocation, residential design review,and variances for the property located at 121 N. Fifth Street, the east%2 of Lot 11 and Lot 1,Block 24,City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is a designated landmark, The project involves removing non-historic additions to the house, restoration of the original cottage,and construction of a new addition to the rear of the cottage, and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the,'Aspen Land Use'Code in order for HPC to grant approval, naively: 1. Staudard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale"and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a"H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Land_ marks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five lntndred (500)square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five(5)percent,HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic Iaudmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling writs pursuant to Section 26.40.090(8)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects.and is consistent�vlth the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. '3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on tho parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and I t VMEKi AS, all applications for partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen,or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district, must meet all of the Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(C) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1.Standaxd: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel;and 2.Standard: The applicant has mitigated,to the greatest extent possible: a.Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. b.Inipacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure;and WIMi RE'AS, all applications for on-site relocation of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district, must meet all of the following Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(D)(2),(3), and (4) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval,namely: 1.Standard: The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure,and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures si1111 not be diminished due to the relocation;and 2.Startdard: The'structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting, A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation;and IStandard: A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other finatkcial security with the engineering department,as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair(if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation;and ' IM- EAS,all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.58.040 must rnbet one of the following statements in order for the Design Review . 1 Appeal Conunittee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; . b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to;or c} be clearly-necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints,and WHEREEA% Amy Gutbxle, in her staff report dated August 25, 1999, performed an analysis of the application based oft the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions;and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on August 25, .1999, the Historic Preservation Cofnmission considered the application,found the application to meet the standards, and approved the applications with conditions by a vote of 7 to 0. THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That final approval, partial demolition, on-site relocation, variances', and Residential Design Standards review for 121 N. fifth Street,the east%z of Lot H and Lot 1,Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the August 25, 1999 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: I The peonies, lilac, and yellow rose bush are typical of Victoyian era properties in Aspen and should be retained. They may be transplanted if necessary because the house is being relocated, but they should be replaced around the house in the same manner that they currently exist. (Note that'this is an advisory condition.) 2. The location of the front door alogg W. Bleeker Street will need to be confirmed to the extent possible by framing evidence(once construction begins)and photographs, 3. The design of the front door must be based on a historic example that exists in town,. with drawings to be,approved by staff and monitor. 4. All existing historic windows in the house rnust be retained. Where the lstoric windows have previously been removed,new replacement windows must match what existed originally,as shQwn in the drawings. 5, Tile HPC has granted the following variances: a 7' combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 2.3' west sideyard-setback variance, a 3' west sideyard setback variance for lightwells, a 1' east sideyard setback variance, and a 3.3' combined sideyard setback variance, finding that the variances are needed to place the bulk of the new construction as far back from the historic•house as possible, and to accoraunodate the width of the existing structure,and are compatible with the historic landmark and the neighborhood. rl 6. HPC mast discuss the new foundation treatment,which is proposed to be clapboards and copper flashing. • r F ' 7. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures when selected. drawings. The flues 8. New flues may be added in the location e U1e°�rtof miner's ecottages and approved shall be metal pipe, detailed in t typical by staff and monitor.A masonry,clapboard,or metal sided stack is not approved. 9. Provide a relocation plan, detailing how tire, house will be securely stored during relocation(windows covered with plywood, fencing around the building),and a letter. of credit in the amount of'$30,000 with submittal-for building permit, 10. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be.renioved as part of the renovation. 11. Submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requireinent is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage. 12.No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not prevlorisly•exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be. removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 13. There shall be no deviations from,the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff atnd monitor, 14. The preservation plan described above, as well as the language of conditions 1-5, 7-9, 13 and 14 will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of tine building permit plan set and all other prints made for tine purpose of construction, 15. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HI)C resolution applicable to this project. The contractor roust submit a letter addressed to HPC staff'as part of the building.permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applyinrg for tine building 'Permit, 16.All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval,unless otherwise amended by other conditions, APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 25th day of August, 1999. Approved as to Form:. David Hoefer,Assistant City Attorney .w I Approved as to Content. HISTORIC rRE,PRE, SB kVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid,Chairman -ATTEST: Kathy Strieldand,Chief Deputy Clerk pOSS . 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 M 970/920-2950 MEMORANDUM TO: Amy Guthrie City of Aspen HPC Chairwoman CC: File FROM: Keith Howie Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. DATE: February 15, 2013 RE: Roth Remodel HPC Application ❑ ENCLOSURE 121 North 5th Street Aspen, Colorado, 81.611 1. Project Location The project is located at the corner of fifth and West Bleeker Streets in the West end of Aspen. This development sits on a corner lot at the juncture of 5th and West Bleeker. Because of this condition, this development is listed in the City of Aspen Building Department as 605 West Bleeker. 2.Legal Address The legal address of the property is Lot A, Small and Large Fries Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded December i5th,3.999, in plat book 52 at page ig 3.Project History In 3.999 an HPC approved addition and renovation was performed on the property. At this time Mary Avjian Architects, (MAA) did a historical investigation of the property. She was graciously provided us with her findings on the property. Please refer to "A brief History of the Harold Ross house" in the graphic section of the application. This renovation added a one story connector volume and two story volume at the south end of the property. The addition connected into the back of the original historic house. A lower level was added under the original house and new addition. The original house is currently a Historically Designated landmark. 4. Neighborhood Context The neighborhood context consists of single family residences. These houses consist of both new and remodeled older houses, some historic and some not. The project site is one block off Main Street, so that there are some larger lodge structures in close proximity to the site.The neighborhood has mature landscaping,consisting of mature cottonwood,Aspen, Spruce,and Pine trees. 4. New Development This project involves restoration of the original cottage, addition of a historically appropriate front porch, remodeling the 1999 2 story addition and connecting element in the back of the original house, and renovation of the interior of the historic house and new addition. pass . t 5. New Development Description In the new development we are changing the roof pitch and volume of the back addition of 3.999, but keeping the overall form. Even though we understand the intent of the 1999 addition (i.e. house and carriage house concept), it is our opinion that the similar materials of the 3.999 addition cloud the perception between what is the original resource and what is the addition. In a true "house and carriage house" scenario, the main house would be larger than the carriage house and usually more ornate, not as currently existing with the carriage house being larger than the main house. Even though the current house plan developed piecemeal, the front current original house fronting West Bleeker street is very similar to what was known in Aspen as a "Miners Cottage". There are many examples of the typology in the west end of Aspen. These houses were utilitarian in purpose and usually self contained structures on a small lot.These cottages usually had small entry porches. The new design does not change the existing massing of the property by keeping a two story volume to the rear section of the property. With the historic resource on the front half of the property, this is the only area that any development can occur. Since the original typology of the "Miners cottage" was a stand-alone building,we are attempting to differentiate the original cottage from the new addition.We feel the proposed development is compatible in massing and form with the historic structure located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels. The proposed development reinforces the historic significance of original historic structure by clearly defining what is historic and what is new and does not diminish the architectural character or integrity of the historic structure. We are proposing these design ideas for the new addition to reinforce this idea. a. Glass Gasket This glass gasket appears on two sides of the house at the end of the original house walls.The gasket is an eighteen inch window and skylight that separates the original house from the new addition. This gasket shows the exact footprint of the original house and gives it prominence. b. Flat roof Connector We have replaced the low sloped pitches roof with a flat roof where the new addition meets the original house. We feel that making this element different in form and materials reinforces the difference between old and new. c. Screened Volume We have altered the cladding on the gable volume and changed the pitch on the roof.We are proposing a slatted wood screen to clad the volume. By using a matte finish material (natural Ipe wood that weathers to a silver grey color)for the wood screen, we are attempting to have the addition recede to give prominence to the original house. The new addition will be two feet taller than the existing gable element. Even with the change in height we are xx'-xx" under the City of Aspen height limit for this roof pitch within the R-6 zone district. d.Addition of porch to Historic House As mentioned above, the development of this house resulted in a plan that mimics a T shaped miner's cottage. Similar houses in the immediate area from this era all have porches. We are asking to add a historically correct porch onto the house. pOSS HPC Design Guidelines Chapter i Streetscape and Lot Features 1.1 Preserve original fences Existing: There currently does not exist any original fencing on the project. Proposed: See sections 1.2 and 1.3 1.2 Replacement Fences Existing: There currently exists a thirty inch high white picket fence along the front and fifth street side of the property and a six foot tall white picket fence that encloses a hot tub on the alley(south)side of the property. Proposed: We are proposing to remove the six foot tall white picket fence on the south side of the property and to replace the smaller thirty inch fence with an open weave steel or cast iron. We feel that the iron fence would be more consistent with the original house and will allow views into the yard. We will look at straightening the fence line along 5th street. 1.3 Transparent Fencing See section 1.2 above 1.4 New Fence Components See section 1.2 above 1.5 Side Yard Fences Existing: There currently exists a side yard fence between our project site and the house next door (6og West Bleeker)that was constructed by the property owner on 6og West Bleeker. Proposed: This fence will remain as it is on the property of 6og West Bleeker. 1.6 Replacement of Side yard Fencing See section 1.5 above Retaining walls 1.7 Preserve original retaining walls 1.8 Maintain Historic height This section does not apply as there are no retaining walls Walkways 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public to private spaces. Existing: There currently exists a curving walkway up to the original house(please refer to survey) Proposed: The existing walkway will be replaced with a walkway that will go between the current trees. This new path will be a sand set stone (species TBD) and approximately three feet wide.This path will be on axis with the front door. Please refer to the new site plan. J � posse 34F Private Yard 1.10 Preserve Historic Elements of the yard. Existing: There are existing mature trees and shrubs on the property, but none of these are in a location or alignment to the historic house that could be considered a "historic element" Proposed: In the front yard it is desired to plant sod, but because of the dense coniferous tree canopy above, only acid (from the pine needles) resistant plants will survive. We are consulting with a landscape architect and will submit a landscape plan at final HPC review forthisarea. 1.11 Preservation of mature landscaping. Existing: There are numerous mature Pine and Aspen trees on the site. Proposed: It is the intent to keep most of the mature trees and shrubs currently on site. We are consulting with an arborist for the possible removal of a number of the pine trees on the front northeast corner of the sit. Currently, these trees are in very close proximity to each other and there is some dead fall and evidence of disease on some trees.We will forward the arborists report during the HPC Final review for evaluation. 1.12 Maintain Historic planting designs Existing: There is currently no historic planting design. Proposed: A new landscape plan taking into account historical precedents will be submitted at the HPC Final review. 1.13 Revisions should be consistent with Historic context See section 1.1.2 above 1.14 Additions to the landscape interfering with Historic elements Existing: There are numerous mature Pine and Aspen trees on the site Proposed: No landscape elements that would obscure the original historic house will be planted.A landscape plan will be submitted at the HPC Final review. Site Lighting 1.15 Minimize the effects of site lighting Existing: The only lighting is surface mounted lighting on the existing structure at code mandated locations Proposed: The only lighting will be on the structure and will conform to the City of Aspen lighting code.An exterior lighting plan will be submitted at final HPC review. Streetscape 1.16 Preserve historically significant landscape designs and features Existing: There are numerous mature trees on the site,please refer to the site survey. In our opinion, none of these trees would be considered historically significant. There are no historically significant landscape designs on the existing site. Proposed: Please see section s.ii and 1.3.2 1.17 Maintain historic irrigation ditches Existing: There currently exists a small irrigation ditch on the east side of the property on 5th street. This ditch is in the City of Aspen right-of-way. Proposed: As the ditch is not on the owner's property, it will remain in current location. � , r possa ; Chapter so- Building Additions Existing Additions so.s Preserve and older addition that has achieved historic significance in its own right Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: A new addition is proposed to the rear of the original historic house. Please refer to the graphic section of the application. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed Existing: There is a non-historic HPC approved addition from 1999• Proposed: The iggg addition will be remodeled.We will re-use the existing foundations and some walls from this addition in the new development. New Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: The new addition is not consistent with the historic house on purpose. The change in materials and forms we think more clearly demonstrate what is historic and what is new rather than mimicking the original house. We are not implying a larger inaccurate version of the original house's historic style. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999• Proposed: The 1999 addition will be removed.The gable form of the new addition pays homage to the original house but the materials on the new addition are recognized as a product of its own time. 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: The new addition will use the current alignment of the 1999 addition. This alignment is on the grid of the original house and City of Aspen grid pattern. 1o.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: The new addition is consistent with the size of the existing HPC approved 3.999 addition and taller in height by two feet. We have attempted to make the new addition as small as possible and have added a wood screening device to attempt to make the addition recede when compared to the original house. � . r possa� 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than the historic building, set it back substantially from the significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: In the 199 addition there exists a low pitched roof connecting element that is set back from the original house.We are changing the "connector"roof form to a flat roof. We feel that changing this roof form distinguishes the original house more from the new addition.We will keep the current wall arrangement that sets back the connector from the original house We are adding a glass "gasket" on both sides of the original house to further separate the original house from the new addition. Please refer to the perspective model pictures. We are changing materials and proportions between the original house and the connector to further reinforce the distinction between the historic resource and the new addition. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999• Proposed: The new addition follows the existing HPC approved 3.999 addition footprint, stepping back from the original walls. It is located at the rear of the property and is set back as much as possible from the original house. The original house will be painted an off white color with a dark color in the gable ends. The new addition will have a dark painted connector and an Ipe wood screen that will weather to a silver grey color. We are using these colors and materials to make the new addition recede in prominence when compared to the original house. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Existing: There are gable roofs on the original house. Proposed: The dominant form on new addition is a gable roof that mimics the gable forms of the original house. Please refer to the existing and proposed elevations. 10.10 Design and addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: The position and materials of the original historic house will not be disturbed. A new historically accurate front porch is proposed for the front of the original house. A new wood shingle roof is proposed for the original house to replace the current roof which is at the end of its lifespan. 10.11 On a new addition use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. Existing: There is a non-historic HPC approved addition from 3.999 with similar siding treatments to the original house. Proposed: The new addition has materials that do not mimic the historic house.We feel that these materials are complementary to, but differentiate the original house from the new addition. poss Rooftop Additions 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition,keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building Existing: There is no rooftop deck on the 1999 addition. Proposed: There will be a rooftop deck that does not overhang the lower floors of the project.This deck is tucked in behind the roof forms of the original house. The only part of this deck that is visible from the street is the glass railing separating the historic house from the new addition. Please refer to the perspective renderings. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999 Proposed: There are no dormers or roof additions proposed to the original historic house. 10.14 The roof form and slope of the new addition should be in character with the historic building Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: The new gabled roof form is consistent with the historical house.The 10/1z slope of the new addition varies only slightly from the 12/12 slope of the historic house.We feel this change of slope helps to keep down the height of the addition and does not visually deviate from the historic house. Summation We feel that this proposed development is compatible in form and volume with the historic structure located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels. The proposed development reinforces the historic significance of the original historic structure by clearly separating what is historic and what is new and does not diminish the architectural character or integrity of the historic structure. We ask that HPC grant conceptual approval of this project. Respectfully Submitted, Keith Howie, Poss Architecture+ Planning Authorized representative for 6oS West Bleeker, LLC. d p°` 7,1 '2�•Z user r ry i,..: �/ '�•S R�.'.f/Yr V4.♦. } •,r -'++ `.'f� Y f1; „ .T �- y� ' = �i IR •Q a "'�(,Vl� 90 St f •' `!•,J •_ �j•, y i, b l�U gf'er£St 1+�, �, _j E:i � �,r-Y fee s_ huicrh olT_{�pen _ ;.,ter ;• t r c IF. 'tAt � �Y YAspen•Vactitlon,.� ; n r ' all r c n] +. p ,�•C.,,-_ �,._', Y +f�yal ARe6'mus9en Z •'+t'T r �M1�+.�bJ + +� '�: Z y • • 1 1 i 1 CmtsirucnonFrBn ON. av � Ty t i- i �y rVj` d i �lal afi.{Sf Kr' y;p'R�L A = RY . ;{ �1 1 : 1 •• 1 . • 41 IN I '•'�'' -a � `z k )j- r. '-++1.� � '• 7W'7y 4� ; z� �i�tF:, • V .•.itRt.: • W r ',e 1 o0p_ ,' -;�,4S., •rr;Z� nQ� Y s.�h _ • '3�.r /`,��• . :.ap. �I��. ;r. _•Z.- ,'n'Q k R, � p Solutyior�Y.at. 1� �• x F '' ^. �� •4� n„'i•.l't"�4 �'+r M sf y i 1 • ►' g N r Wig - p' r.�' a '` .% •;M �!; •�i r' PjF• l'.• -•V�r'.il _ 6p0., 7" ♦ �'1 .''ry `6 f r �.. k. rdenendez r' Ard+rt2o'[sIPC� �,�' � (d :� Rv�ng Fork�f ",• !,r _ 'r +r4 BT of Aspen pEryeCimio �'• Wyk Its ReaI:Estnle <<lrr � ;6 • t3 d ` -. .+ ��°�ker�Sr a'„ _� CQ R •'" '�7�,:b` /1 �. M d�Z 71: 111 Asen •� =�' p "•Vli Mwr Inn: r _ alrr St ve rw J• �p ^�• 11.�'r.X-•+• , I.IolYrrtaln Lo e ,;yl • • • 1 1 11 Y 1 11 1' U r Easy Peel®Labels A Mend alone tine to = [� �� ® 51010® Use Avery Template 5160 Feed Paper expose pop-up EdgeTM , 1 ' 501 WEST MAIN LLC 604 WEST LLC 612 WEST LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 604 W MAIN ST 604 W MAIN ST ASPEN,CO 81611-1818 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ALLEN DOUGLAS P ALPINE BANK ASPEN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC 403 LACET LN ATTN ERIN WIENCEK 137 WESTVIEW DR ASPEN,CO 81611 PO BOX 10000 ASPEN,CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS,CO 81602 ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ASPEN MESA STORE LLC ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC INC 620 W BLEEKER ST C/O ASPEN BLUE SKY HOLDINGS LLC 617 E COOPER ASPEN,CO 81611 BOX 8 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,C O O 81612 BAILEY RYAN TANNER MCKENZIE TRST BERR LLC BROOKS NORMAN A&LESLEE S 60% BAKER&HOSTETLER LLP 611 W MAIN ST 16311 VENTURA BLVD#690 303 E 17TH AVE#1100 ASPEN,CO 81611 ENCINO,CA 91436 DENVER,CO 80203 BURKE OLSHAN ASPEN PROP LLC CARTER RICHARD P CHAKERES REAL ESTATE LLC C/O 265 ELK CREEK MGMT PO BOX 2932 3431 E SUNSET RD SN OWMASS,CO $16549320 LITTLE ELK CREEK AVE TELLURIDE,CO 81435 LAS VEGAS,NV 89120 CHRISTIANA ASPEN CONDOMINIUM CHRISTIANA UNIT D101 LLC CITY OF ASPEN OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 795 LAKEVIEW DR ATTN FINANCE DEPT 201 N MILL ST#203 MIAMI BEACH,FL 33140 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 CLEANER EXPRESS COCHENER CAROLINE A TRUST#5 COLLETT JOHN&VIRGINIA C 435 E MAIN ST 7309 EAST 21ST ST#120 1111 METROPOLITAN AVE#700 ASPEN,CO 81611 WICHITA,KS 67206 CHARLOTTE,NC 28204 CORONA VANESSA LOPEZ CORTALE 1TA CUMMINS RICHARD PO BOX 3670 205 S MILL ST#112 1280 LITE AVE#10 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 DART ELIZABETH RODWELL DESTINATION RESORT MGMT INC DILLON RAY IV 633 W MAIN ST PO BOX B2 PO BOX 10543 M ASPEN,CO 81611 SNOWMASS VILLAGE,CO 81615 ASPEN,CO 81612 DUNSDON S MICHAELE EMERICK SHELLEY W FARR CHARLOTTE BORKENHAGEN DAVID A 2449 5TH ST 306 MCCORMICK AVE 617 W MAIN ST #D BOULDER,CO 80304 CAPITOLA,CA 95010 ASPEN,CO 81611-1619 l tiquettes faciles h peter ' ® Repfiez a la hachure afin cle i www.avery.com 1 11+1llcn�Ic nnknrlf Awrov0 K9 an® Sens de MwAlc 1.—knrri Pnn.mvC I 1.>;nn_r0_evvav Easy PeelO Labels { A Bend along tine to [ AVERVO 51600 Usb AveryO Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM , V FAT CITY HOLDINGS LLC FELD ANNE S FERGUS ELIZABETH DAWSON 402 MIDLAND PARK PL 1700 PACIFIC AVE#4100 PO BOX 1515 ASPEN,CO 81611 DALLAS,TX 75201 ASPEN,CO 81612 FINE FREDRIC N&SANDRA FRIAS PROPERTIES OF ASPEN LLC GANT CONDO ASSC 412 MARINER DR 730 E DURANT 610 S WESTEND ST JUPITER,FL 33477 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 816112142 GARMISCH LODGING LLC GOLDMAN DIANNE L H&H PROPERTIES LLLP 110 W MAIN ST PO BOX 518 807 W MORSE BLVD STE 101 ASPEN,CO 81611 FAIRFIELD,CT 06824 WINTER PARK,FL 32789-3725 HALPERIN ALEXANDRA&BARBARA HAYES MARY E&JAMES L FAM LP LLLP HAYMAN JULES ALAN 52 LARKSPUR DR 209 E BLEEKER ST 9238 POTOMAC SCHOOL DR CARBONDALE,CO 81623 ASPEN,CO 81611 POTOMAC,MD 20854 HENRY KRISTEN HILLMAN TATNALL L REV TRUST HY MOUNTAIN TRANSPORTATION INC 525 W HALLAM ST 504 W BLEEKER ST 111C AABC ASPEN,CO 81611-1246 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 IGLEHART SANDRA K JAS CAPITAL LLC JW610 LLC 617 W MAIN ST 617 W MAIN ST#E 604 W MAIN ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 KALLMANN HERBERT KELSO DOUGLAS P LORD KAREN&COURTNEY PO BOX 3965 627 W MAIN ST 631 W BLEEKER ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611-1619 ASPEN,CO 81611 MACDONALD BETTE S TRUST MCCREARY KATHLEEN MOLLER DIANE T 15 BLACKMER RD 20 ISLAND AVE#1511 1710 MIRA VISTA AVE ENGLEWOOD,CO 80110 MIAMI BEACH,FL 33139 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93103 MOUNTAIN RESCUE ASPEN INC MURPHY JULIANNE RUTH&WILLIAM NATIONWIDE THEATRES CORP 630 W MAIN ST REES 120 N ROBERTSON BLVD ASPEN,CO 81611 9833 SHORELINE LOS ANGELES,CA 90048 LONGMONT,CO 80504 NECHADEIM REALTY LLC NEWBERGER DAVID NORTH AND SOUTH ASPEN LLC PO BOX 4950 2905 SAN GABRIEL#218- 200 S ASPEN ST ASPEN,CO 81612 AUSTIN,TX 78705 ASPEN,CO 81611 Gtlquettes faciles a peler A Repliez h la hachure afin de www.aveyy.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 j elha naman4 r6veler le rebord Po -u me p p 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel@ Labels i A Bend along line to I Use AveryO Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up CdgeT'" I ® AVERS p 5160 P&L PROPERTIES LLC PERRY EMILY V RENO ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC 101 S 3RD ST#360 70012TH AVE S UNIT 807 7710 E EVENING GLOW DR GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81501 NASHVILLE,TN 372033372 SCOTTSDALE,AZ 852661295 REVA LLC RODRIGUEZ JOANN RUFUS CAMI CAMI LLC PO BOX 1376 605 W MAIN ST#OOA 1280 UTE AVE#7 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 RUSSO NICK A SAND CANYON CORP SANDERS BARBARA PO BOX 4743 501 W MAIN ST 634 W MAIN ST#8 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 SCHALL FAMILY TRUST 8/31/1998 SCHEFF JONATHAN&BUTTERWICK SCHWARTZ RACHEL KUKES&MARK 3841 HAYVENHURST DR KIMBERLY 375 LAKE PARK DR ENCINO, CA 91436 6450 AVENIDA CRESTA BIRMINGHAM,MI 48009 SAN DIEGO,CA 92037 SMITH ANDREW C&DONNA G THROM DOUGLAS H TOMS CONDO LLC 3622 SPRINGBROOK ST 617 W MAIN ST C/O BRANDT FEIGENBAUM PC DALLAS,TX 75205 ASPEN,CO 81611 132 MIDLAND AVE#4 BASALT,CO 81621 TUCKER LUCY LEA ULLR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VES TRUST H PO BOX 1480 600 E HOPKINS 4304 1260 IVAN JOHN F TRUST 50% ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 DEN ER,CO E 02 ST DENVER,C 80220 � VIEIRA LINDA 50%INTEREST WAGNER HOLDINGS CORP LLC WENDT ROBERT E 11 HALL TERESA 50%INTEREST C/O BILL POSS 350 MT HOLYOKE AVE 0095 LIGHT HILL RD 605 E MAIN ST PACIFIC PALISADES,CA 90272 SNOWMASS,CO 81654 ASPEN,CO 81611 WERLIN LAURA B TRUST WHIPPLE JOHN TAGGART 2279 PINE ST 121 S GALENA ST SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94115 ASPEN,CO 81611 kicluettes faciles a neler t A Repliez a la hachure afln de i www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@!51600 i charaen ent r6v6fer to rebord Pop-up'ac j 1-800-GO-AVERY i EXHIBIT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 6©S W - ��¢¢`GQJS S r�.� ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: l3 �go _,9 -'ap xn , 20J-3 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 11 �1111l �C I (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that 1 have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the_day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (:sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) ,.> Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. -4 --t--� Signature The�oregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 2(t day of , 2013, by, -, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL f�JBLIC NOTICE RE: 605 W.SLEEKER STpEET-CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENTAND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing My commission expires: will be held on Wednesday,March 13,2013,at a 5.H meet, Preservatin C00 ommission,fin Council 'Chambers,Ci \ y HPC will co sider anlappli ati n Galena tted by Aspen.05 W.Sleeker LLC,c/o 201 Mill Street,#203,As- pen,CO,81611,owner ofaa property located at otary Public l'1� 605 W.Sleeker Street,Let A,Small and Large v�j/ Fries Subdivision,Block 2 "Cityy and Townsite of ...... ♦` Aspen,PID#2735-12444- :'life applicant pro- ��o o%� Poses to demolish and reconstruct an addition at the back of the existing Victorian house. The ex- t,A fisting foundation will be re-used,and re-approval of LINDA M. setback variances previously allowed for the side e and rear yards is requested. For further informs- oil v[NIC3 0° tion,contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen I1� Community Development Department,130 S.Ga. 1,' Jena St.,Aspen,CO, 970)429-2758,am r.a@cityofaspen.com. ( y.9uth- a/Ann Muiilr,: ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: Chair,Aspao Nb"ric Pra6rvaaon PUBLICATION Published in the Aspen Times Weekly n February OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) My Comm' ssion Expires 031291201 21,2013. [8 908745] WNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED * APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: m OJ U1. � � ST ,Aspen, CO a rn SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: y ti ..OW and-4C/l /3 , 2013 Q- '< m� M STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, AbC aAS eD (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. LPosting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the 1- day of 117IZZAA4W , 203 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A phot graph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ignature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this day of g,2 L44-/e�i , 20/1, by iy tc fb✓�RS c Re-0&ON WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL GIUSEPPE AMATO S o a� My commission expires: /�-3—/�p Notary ID 20124077549 My Commission Expires Dec 3, 2016 No Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 GTAMA JINRUIL� AMA Vigok to DIWW ® Q PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 605 W. BLEEKER STREET- CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday,March 13,2013, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen. HPC will consider an application submitted by 605 W. Bleeker LLC, c/o 201 N. Mill Street,#203, Aspen, CO, 81611, owner of the properly located at 605 W. Bleeker Street, Lot A, Small and Large Fries Subdivision, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen, PID #2735-124-44-003. The applicant proposes to demolish and reconstruct an addition at the back of the existing Victorian house. The existing foundation will be re-used, and re- approval of setback variances previously allowed for the side and rear yards is requested. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen, CO, (970)429-2758,amy.guthrie @cityofaspen.com. s/Ann Mullins Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on February 21,2013 City of Aspen Account * PUBLIC NOTICE' Date: Wed., March 113. 2013 Time: 5:00 p.m. Place:Council Chambers, City ._ Hall 130_SG alena Aspen Purpose: HPC will conduct Conceptual review .. .__ of an application submitted by the owner of this property, 605 W. Bleeker, LLC, c/o 201 N. Mill, #203, Aspen,C0,81611. The project is replacement of the addition along the alley using the same footprint. HPC is asked to re-affirm previously granted setback variances. For further information contact Aspen Plannin De t. at 970-429-2758. Easy Peel®Labels i A Bend along line to AVERY@ AVERY 51600 Use AveryO Template 6160® Feed Paper expose trop-up EdgeT°" 501 WEST MAIN LLC 604 WEST LLC 612 WEST LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 604 W MAIN ST 604 W MAIN ST ASPEN,CO 81611-1818 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ALLEN DOUGLAS P ALPINE BANK ASPEN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC 403 LACET LN ATTN ERIN WIENCEK 137 WESTVIEW DR ASPEN,CO 81611 PO BOX 10000 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS,CO 81602 ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ASPEN MESA STORE LLC ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC INC 620 W BLEEKER ST C/O ASPEN BLUE SKY HOLDINGS LLC 617 E COOPER ASPEN,CO 81611 PO BOX 8238 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 BAILEY RYAN TANNER MCKENZIE TRST BERR LLC BROOKS NORMAN A&LESLEE S 50% 611 W MAIN ST 16311 VENTURA BLVD#690 BAKER&HOSTETLER LLP ASPEN, CO 81611 ENCINO, CA 91436 303 E 17TH AVE#1100 DENVER,CO 80203 BURKE OLSHAN ASPEN PROP LLC CARTER RICHARD P CHAKERES REAL ESTATE LLC C/O ELK CREEK MGMT PO BOX 2932 3431 E SUNSET RD 255 LITTLE ELK CREEK AVE TELLURIDE,CO 81435 LAS VEGAS, NV 89120 SNOWMASS,CO 81654-9320 CHRISTIANA ASPEN CONDOMINIUM CHRISTIANA UNIT D101 LLC CITY OF ASPEN OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 795 LAKEVIEW DR ATTN FINANCE DEPT 201 N MILL ST#203 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 CLEANER EXPRESS COCHENER CAROLINE A TRUST#5 COLLETT JOHN&VIRGINIA C 435 E MAIN ST 7309 EAST 21 ST ST#120 1111 METROPOLITAN AVE#700 ASPEN,CO 81611 WICHITA, KS 67206 CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 CORONA VANESSA LOPEZ CORTALE ITA CUMMINS RICHARD PO BOX 3670 205 S MILL ST#112 1280 UTE AVE#10 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 DART ELIZABETH RODWELL DESTINATION RESORT MGMT INC DILLON RAY IV 633 W MAIN ST PO BOX B2 PO BOX 10543 ASPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN,CO 81612 DUNSDON S MICHAELE EMERICK SHELLEY W FARR CHARLOTTE BORKENHAGEN DAVID A 2449 5TH ST 306 MCCORMICK AVE 617 W MAIN ST #D BOULDER,CO 80304 CAPITOLA,CA 95010 ASPEN, CO 81611-1619 Etiquettes faciles a paler ; ® Repliez a la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com ; Easy Peel® Labels i A Bend along line to i AVERY® 51600 Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM j FAT CITY HOLDINGS LLC FELD ANNE S FERGUS ELIZABETH DAWSON 402 MIDLAND PARK PL 1700 PACIFIC AVE#4100 PO BOX 1515 ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS,TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81612 FINE FREDRIC N&SONDRA FRIAS PROPERTIES OF ASPEN LLC GANT CONDO ASSC 412 MARINER DR 730 E DURANT 610 S WESTEND ST JUPITER, FL 33477 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816112142 GARMISCH LODGING LLC GOLDMAN DIANNE L H&H PROPERTIES LLLP 110 W MAIN ST PO BOX 518 807 W MORSE BLVD STE 101 ASPEN, CO 81611 FAIRFIELD,CT 06824 WINTER PARK, FL 32789-3725 HALPERIN ALEXANDRA&BARBARA HAYES MARY E&JAMES L FAM LP LLLP HAYMAN JULES ALAN 52 LARKSPUR DR 209 E BLEEKER ST 9238 POTOMAC SCHOOL DR CARBONDALE,CO 81623 ASPEN,CO 81611 POTOMAC, MD 20854 HENRY KRISTEN HILLMAN TATNALL L REV TRUST HY-MOUNTAIN TRANSPORTATION INC 525 W HALLAM ST 504 W BLEEKER ST 111 C AABC ASPEN, CO 81611-1246 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 IGLEHART SANDRA K JAS CAPITAL LLC JW616 LLC 617 W MAIN ST 617 W MAIN ST#E 604 W MAIN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KALLMANN HERBERT KELSO DOUGLAS P LORD KAREN&COURTNEY PO BOX 3965 627 W MAIN ST 631 W BLEEKER ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611-1619 ASPEN, CO 81611 MACDONALD BETTE S TRUST MCCREARY KATHLEEN MOLLER DIANE T 15 BLACKMER RD 20 ISLAND AVE#1511 1710 MIRA VISTA AVE ENGLEWOOD,CO 80110 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93103 MOUNTAIN RESCUE ASPEN INC MURPHY JULIANNE RUTH&WILLIAM NATIONWIDE THEATRES CORP 630 W MAIN ST REES 120 N ROBERTSON BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 9833 SHORELINE LOS ANGELES,CA 90048 LONGMONT, CO 80504 NECHADEIM REALTY LLC NEWBERGER DAVID NORTH AND SOUTH ASPEN LLC PO BOX 4950 2905 SAN GABRIEL#218 200 S ASPEN ST ASPEN, CO 81612 AUSTIN,TX 78705 ASPEN,CO 81611 kicluettes faciles a peter i ® Repliez a la hachure afin de i www.avery.com Easy Peel®Labels i A Bend along line to AVERS'® 51600 Use AveiyO Template 51600 Feed Paper "`-" "` expose loop-up EdgeT°^ P&L PROPERTIES LLC PERRY EMILY V RENO ASPEN PROPERTIES LLC 101 S 3RD ST#360 700 12TH AVE S UNIT 807 7710 E EVENING GLOW DR GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81501 NASHVILLE,TN 372033372 SCOTTSDALE,AZ 852661295 REVA LLC RODRIGUEZ JOANN RUFUS CAMI CAMI LLC PO BOX 1376 605 W MAIN ST#OOA 1280 UTE AVE#7 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 RUSSO NICK A SAND CANYON CORP SANDERS BARBARA PO BOX 4743 501 W MAIN ST 634 W MAIN ST#8 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SCHALL FAMILY TRUST 8/31/1998 SCHEFF JONATHAN&BUTTERWICK SCHWARTZ RACHEL KUKES&MARK 3841 HAYVENHURST DR KIMBERLY 375 LAKE PARK DR ENCINO,CA 91436 6450 AVENIDA CRESTA BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009 SAN DIEGO,CA 92037 SMITH ANDREW C& DONNA G THROM DOUGLAS H TOMS CONDO LLC 3622 SPRINGBROOK ST 617 W MAIN ST C/O BRANDT FEIGENBAUM PC DALLAS,TX 75205 ASPEN,CO 81611 132 MIDLAND AVE#4 BASALT,CO 81621 50% SWEENE JOHN F TRUST 50% TUCKER LUCY LEA ULLR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VES TRUST PO BOX 1480 600 E HOPKINS#304 SWE IVANHOE ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80220 VIEIRA LINDA 50% INTEREST WAGNER HOLDINGS CORP LLC WENDT ROBERT E II HALL TERESA 50% INTEREST C/O BILL POSS 350 MT HOLYOKE AVE 0095 LIGHT HILL RD 605 E MAIN ST PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272 SNOWMASS,CO 81654 ASPEN, CO 81611 WERLIN LAURA B TRUST WHIPPLE JOHN TAGGART 2279 PINE ST 121 S GALENA ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 ASPEN,CO 81611 Etlquettes fables d peleY j Repliez a la hachure afin de i wvvw.avery.com r rl► ,•, jr OT i _'_.�—• t. O K14'.11'� a +4f`,. �q f " _ �''` �. ♦ i s f� • ran. 1-1.ui" �.......,l. IS Now n"emsel �uanennux iuuoauunn�. nuow goo■..: of iii :i�ruu■. .....■...■.■■■...■■.■■..■.■■■..■■■■o■■■■.■' nn■n u■�u ■■. ll I unn�am wmu auium Na p� ��� R��� �� I;i I�IIII 11(II�I�IIIIIIII VIIII (I (III ICI IIIIIIIII�II���I ail 11 IR Mill1!lIiIi1111iI11 u$i �. CID . I 1 11 I 1 Roth Remodel HPC Application - Drawinq List Cover Drawing List Copy of Survey by Aspen Survey Engineers A Brief History of the Harold Ross House New Site Plan Existing conditions - MAA drawings - 1999 I'il A.O1 General Information Sheet A1 .2 Site Plan � - A2.1 Lower + Main Level Floor Plans , A2.2 Upper + Roof Level Floor Plans Existing + proposed lower level floor plans 03 Alley Corner Birds Eye View Existing + proposed main level floor plans KkE:Nesa Existing + proposed upper level floor plans Existing and proposed roof plans Existing conditions - MAA drawings - 1999 A3.1 East + North Elevations A3.2 West + South Elevations Existing house perspective view from West Bleeker + 5th street New addition perspective view from West Bleeker + 5th street - ;h Existing house perspective view from 5th street r f New addition perspective view from 5th street Existing house perspective view from alley corner of property New addition perspective from alley corner of property 02 Drawing List 01 West Bleeker+5th Birds Eye View SCALE:N'o Scale SCALE:Yo Scale ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL 605 W.Bleeker,Aspen, Colorado pO$$ ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW 00/ [0/T 5 4 STREET &S PEN, O9L50 /1011 ITI 970/9t9 ♦1// Ir)9101990 3000 .. r February15,2013 LEGEND AND NOTES I•-1 o• O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 0 10 20 9 CONTROL $_ WOOD FENCE ONE FOOT CONTOURS WIRE FENCE S 4 $ cl UTILITY BOX L° K O LATER VALVE , E 78• .8 CITY OF ASPEN ® MANHOLE GPS 19 TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. tl�, TR E 8 T CITY OF ASPEN _ CASE NO. PCT23117. GPS•20 DATED:APRIL 4. 2012 CRETE 1� N POSTED ADDRESS '605' Rssls of Q/RB J )S. e CITY YON . E4R/1Wi �7920.J :�o EVERGREEN TREE NE ELK 16 CIT 7 1I•E S o'e l J4 Y YO"Tp2 C,TY�" �' I 12-1/ DIAMETER(INCHESI-DRIP LINEIFEETI R ® DECIDUOUS TREE BENCHMARK-7922.33' AT S.E. PROPERTY CORNER YEL CAP 45,p0• THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN ZONE'X• (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE SGO-YEAR .6129' FLOOD PLAINT AS SHOWN ON 8000 INSURANCE RATE MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A..FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 08097CO204 C. EFFECTIVE 9p_�. DATE: JUNE 4, 1937 THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLO9 HAZARD 816129 y o'7 / IF IIGURESESEFSNED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. PROJECT NUMBER 1963 s i PORCH 2 16 PORCH 21-105.09' I'f 792 -12 CITY MONUM ENT / OVERHAN 12-14 NE BLK 11 S. (TYPICAL 25-17 \ 19-1 7920.6 NOTE 14.6'\ 17_1 ! SEE RECEPTION NO.443996 AND N0. 5301{)FOR CITY OF ASPEN REVOCABLE ENCROACFWIENT LICENSE / 4 FOR LANDSCAPING l IRRIGATION .o IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY I/2 STORY 20.4 20-1 KOOD / .v 7921.51 "DOUSE $ 4.3. z L07- F LOT D Wo 1 1/2 STORY WOOD FRANE HOUSE / e-11 / c 1.500 SO FT. •/- o �/ / 0.1033 ACRES•/- Ip l.7 CCCTTT"' ' S'S FENCE/ / RW 4'4 ENCROAAAQIES R As/ LOT A WALK 2-1/ y .50 . E S FT. •/- n / ® CERTIFICATION 2. 4 0.10 0 SQ 33 ACR •/- 1 C ELERC 3 /1 THE DURING STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON MA9 FIELD SURVEYED AND 19 ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS 8 W SNOWN.AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD. BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. A/ PLANTER / / a ENCROACHIENERE EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO CONFLICTS. W EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES.ME YTR l,p ¢ _ / W AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY 2 v, I IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. (�I DATED: $ CO V E DRI / '4 wt / U JOHN M. HOWORTH. P.L.S. 25947 9ey$j DRIVE Jy2 h 3 14 SP4 \ PATIO ' l2 4 7 � ® z 7923.7 90.00. COA'CREi 5 7 DRI V�4Y® Al L LJ G#4 VEC "7S*."'** l 1S, 792 O E CO DO If,OE, cK 'f 4 1922.9 RCR04CT{3 16-12 / PLAT NOTES FROM SUBD. PLAT / ALIM NI DISK 1. % CON ET 16129 ELEY-7922.33' 2. DEVELOPMENT OF LOT B SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MITIGATE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PURSUANT TO SECTION 26.100.0501AI1211c1 OF THE MUM OPAL CODE. 3. THE Tt0 LOTS CREATED BY THIS LOT SPLIT SHALL BE PROHIBITED FROM APPLYING FOR FURTHER SUBDIVISION AND ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE LOTS WILL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE LAND USE CODE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. 4. THE TWO LOTS CREATED BY THIS LOT SPLIT SHALL HAVE A TOTAL ALLOWABLE BASE FAR. ON BOTH LOTS COMBINED. EQUAL TO 1.5e0 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIALLY APPLICABLE LOT AREA REDUCTIONS (i.e.. SLOPES.ACCESS EASEMENTS, M4.I. THE APPLICANT SHALL VERIFY WITH THE CITY ZONING OFFICER TIE TOTAL ALLOWABLE FAR ON EACH LOT. TAKING INTO ACCOUNT ANY AND ALL APPLICABLE L01 ABEA REOUCTI ON3. THE PROPERTY SHALL BE SUBDIVIDED INTO TWO PARCELS.LOTS A AND B. EACH 1.500 90UARE FEET IN SIZE. PROVIDED IT IS FOUND BY THE ZONING OFFICE D THAT NO LOT AREA REDUCTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE MAXIMUM IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC $I7AV$Y ALLOWABLE FAR ON LOT A WILL BE 2.339 f. (INCLUDING A 500 SQUARE FOOT OF FLOOR AREA BONUS) AND 2,241 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA ON LOT B. S. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT ON THE LOTS WILL CONFORM TO THE DIMENSIONAL LOT A. REOUI REMEN TS OF THE R-6 ZONE DISTRICT. EXCEPT THE VARIANCES APPROVED SMALL AND LARGE FRIES SUBDIVISION.ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OY RECORDED DECEMBER 15. 1999 IN PLAT BOOK 52 AT PAGE 19, THE HPC. S. LOTS 4 AND B ARE DESIGNATED HISTORIC LANDMARKS AND CAST RECEIVE HPC CITY OF ASPEN APPROVAL FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT IN ACCOPOANCE WITH SECTION 26.72 OF THE COUNTY OF PITKIN MUNICIPAL CODE AS WELL AS SECTION 26.58. THE'RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS' STATE OF COLORADO PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. aW w mO Nm c NNE♦wr= 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET �sn3rI LE w®va"RD iyr p6ccr an rill Mwi rl rnln rff rFw•� ASPEN.COLORADO 31611 �ei�Per o�l9mrra aTMUlw3 A°u�r re In Ir19A3 r�melon ;PWT1M li wID IP wi liPiiM®Wei rr�Ieid a- PHONE/FAX(9701 925-3816 UrEYV. DATE OB 12/12 29116G 0 A 11stor of tke larold -built in 1888 6y Akkie Weller W'llpaperFound durin7construction: ^^ _ F? -LrM -5 4 011 in i 89 1 to rkill and 5te1la Conner _ 1 892 to 1 � a ' -Solt in Ross -sold in 19O 1 to Harry I_. Smith -sold in 1 902 to H. C. Kennely -5011 in 1905 to G. W. Smith -- - i 4 g -5014 in 1951 to Goldic Bascom _ o In 1 952 to rlsa ]=ischer ---- �Isa and her Soyearold - --- - - - -5011 In 198 5 to Cus f lallum father E-dward remodeled the house in 1 952. 1888 1890'5 '1952 1985 2000 West Meeker The original structure, Harold Ross was born in In 1952, a third 1n 1985 Gus f lallum undertook an contrary to local legend, The Harold Ross [louse, this house rn 1892. hulling was brought extensive remodel of the house, restructured with a one and was not a log structure, Ile later left As en onto the site enclosing the kack orch but rather 2x4 framing. om P a half stor addition. �' to become the founding elsewh removing all the original siding, y Yorker. ere in o tke k and adding a 2 x 6 wall around the Ready to stand another �litor o� the "New and added to the house. 100 years! v It is the gable erimeter of the house. facing 5leeker5treet. ne said the added insulation saved he and his wife from freezing that winter. History courtesy of: Mary A.Av ian Architects,P.C. . .. .. - I GONTI NIroA WR76`/Ei'1T —N6W PePtt°+T�H NFSLF� ✓', . 4(21Pes VENT ❑ NSW PhpkP.+75H1 N64Fts - - a M6rr+-R/4iNI4 Mary A.A lan wa Tr 1; - ;--�` �PnaiwV�S7�iDINrs Architects;FC. 50 Rivet Oalm lane 41'IS1 #4Rrb�h1WM Basalt,Co.81621 (970}379-6067 . I ' To.FWD -. a'FIYMK.M•Iff lgaP. ❑- ❑ _ -LT a.PLATE I PUE: W E DRIC 510N,1-14-99 108'3° ` --. G:05Fr ? — —� H.P.G.CONCEPTUAL:1-28 99 _ \ �jp,° Y' 1'1EW WaOD WINR7i'l T77 . l ' REPLKf+T(r OHe!N�I. H.P.G.FINAL.B-II-99 ANEW���� EulLglrlS Paxrur,4-20-99, i � I -- GiHdw PvcK°66�.Ilya.`f°I . M Piz'. < I Q N6W oPPFR I'�atl rYs _ ,a•PcY 1ol'•a1' � _ --- - N LFJ.EI. -ra ftiT 101�_Ga enoW IIG lot I �-LJL-- Y - --_ ————— owazyp . TaGdNG. g`ILG� 001 TO.torlfi• %- N LM.6gNb 422lI}} �_NoR7H��aTIdN CP�6EKF.R � LUI r4vlLO"' cN ----- --� — W Q ��.d'p�66w•P6 � (W� _ -------GONn NVOJ4 14 W.vE47• � 1� I: f� - • I ' A4�1 .I II {"wDTRIM rt�, LL UII AII W OL ep� V e �� l I •1 I i „ 4 It 'a`F' I I S I ' - Opl� NPIHS4 T2!M a TO.FLY vPPFF ME T71 . �i 1 � �I j, � OWb1N•LI.VICd7WMGOW I I p p y n PSPAIF�P�•/cY IHa�P -�aNs�+Pasvi PeG-New ..- .O. � 7 4!plN6ToM•.TGt{ Nb P1 ..1 Ma�T 6NTtkY/oFle rw+ lol:6n —�0 — I ' - ----------�- - �--- - -- _ H PROJECT: h16W PIR7G.WirIWW�i�. !�ry I I Ta Kr T lOO-4" SMALL 4 LARGE PRIE5 (�P1•i'wniFiOfLIbINP�-htWRNYi RESIDENCE ON I }N[CPTWM: I P•a '!? P�'+gN N'L+�C9IDINB DESCRIPTION: I; laf lb'4P.DMET,.-L.01pirl6 O • I Nt�J f!R!614--orooP veFT4-I.VW D 01 a N5 EAST AND NORTH ELEVATION G�Pre'-F>I-aHIN3 EC WaaP TWM,°4 6-t�WN I -HG3.G�2f?l� M51rPL ❑ ❑ I I I ins& SHEET: I. -- - �. L-W A3 01 To�A1rY� e-.or&^ -nON ❑- 1 r,�=I ❑ ° ❑ 4 .I '•� � ..�. � � '� .�/'� R!.� -- 'lOhiTIP-ILY.P VENT , o PIH& A 'ian 5 Architects,P.C. n 50 Rivet Oab Cane ..._ _._ MF.?N6 13asaI4 Co.81621 C _ F4nPIN6 97OW9-45067 O D H1�.ILM. ORKS@951ON,7-1499. H.P.G.GONG�NAL,7-Z8i9 • � � - � �j H.Y.O.FINAL,B-II-99' . . 4V+�11P;P-P.Y111I AI rI'b Net*RWI7 .BUILDING PLYiMIT,q-ZO-99. . P.�t Woa7 ��eu.PAG17'0B IIH/ 6W.-I:yK+%Rt7P }} ! ravlNe� . . . . . . . . . MAI,4 Lem- to• T.c,Pir Tor r 71 1'•3 i. I .. Ti.Piy Tod°O" I .0 I i q O.H• h• /Z.ol I �,ppWopM FEP Iz//�.u4 i I U5F{TWOW P�6YOND . '1111y ubFITWEU.IN PWi6 I � P PdOM M Ir�I. JR'%0K^N. I y tl loci IA, . -(aq dk1617 MDT-L. I I I L!__U 6owRFt awet� LL PZ Te.coNv, � fry=.o - r� �C1TION UQ�IN�NoP'f++ � .%taVTH Et.eVP71oN � O H• K I'YW TWM ,f� iK- 31 ?'I ( Iu) :� YY P�ANALT Gh4NBl.6�i V i -A KVPI AA PIN& LL Lp V A-��� p 1-II i { I {!! I {I Tr "Pwh°P�PTt>IdWcba�laNb Z i -- I (. :J , }f i I I J 1� _ WavPCTo%OMPPbiDD I ( , %Y N,RQ HBYI'rA-4t- I .i y 1 1 .I 1 - Po•fLY l o2�,v . _ ! °PROJECT: 6ONTINVOx (tI ❑ SMALL S LARGE FRIES Lr�aRNbl.Dh VP.NT / RE5IDENGE NDw-HwaWlNlww ro MI"TisLRi.(reHlNg III f�FN� I - PiTlbOWaNN. I © L Pt7P{+DkPi°TIE1ilI07pGVINb DESCRIPTION: - ��F I I 0t tRfW M6Tp1.51pIHb WEST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS Na�P hl f Psi I' P£a- OPARr'b T0 MP'TGIi SHEET: �- ` S` TO, TO.LNG. (}(!(N / ( I V4V?T�Lb•vP41oN A=i.7- 13 —❑ _ Ju i*#'±.• r =" y'ti �' r a !' Y =r7 z _ -■ y�,1 '� . ,��f 1 Si I ww"ll - ' aLC_ Viz:�-- P'- __•�-'-_-,_ _•. � • _ 1 �-� -�� li •f'�•�_ ��� _ ' - - _ �_--_ - - _ _ - - __ _ - - �-_„ ,- -a-- � - - _� -_ - _ � _rti'=__ L - �; i - r ��'� _ - � ��� ��,• _ 1 r rim_ _ ,J i of, �I .-�; I � � :, ;����° �, rte,.. _�. _ � �; � '• '' � , #�� 1 � I .?�.. e'i a• .,mil- .i �� � ,i _ � �'r Y i ,t"-V�' � •� ,� # vie R ." �.\\ y �j`, —"- "•1 ,,� IS � MEMO- i� M�a1�� ait L � .a�. .f � J il��'�' 7��ii11�w# �. "dd" #• �F ' ,•r . �,rt y low - �' _ ,: _ _ :� �► _ b Y - • 1 I • 1 • I 1 .t•.. �� :. i � � Rena��4 j 1, f r s '~ v..., Sy tier. � .� �..� t ���. `�\_ �_�� •1, '��` s•. T �. �;: -�-As°`��{•-f'��w � Sn: .�.r�.�>+ - i.'��r _ -,rte. 1��I ,� - l �•• P r - , �� .cam - 9- �.� •+ � .,�': T II�,•If' r �,ti���i. i f�.�.c t � ti j n�t' it A � .rr ' ( ''4�{7� V^ 1� � a � s ,t' �q �` � ; � '{ ! �{ f� `t i� ���1�•�t,�@t 111; r�',; I I 4� , 7 Kj 'JA*O�Aw- �Ar 0II AL-1 �. . ! _ " { 4,jtti� jt� r ,: d'.'� q9 h :'r. :�� ! �' 6 illn iit1i!{yp �:�^ 11r1�1 ., �,• Slt �� „1 ,,r iy-tlr d `+� � '' � f5 !: �'t� ���� ��i��r� {N1 1l� 11r���•� ��� r 4{�' fy ` �.. � , � '��'tr ,r� rr�p'� �'{`� "+ •A.' �fiY�,'I Iraro �'`I�t ??��,, �l. r •f•1 , ;i�,# ���Y�,l'�� �3�'' 1�� '' r `�,'�',"s�t t �+.��� 'lf';�J'�� �% .iT ,ti.� ati' ��: ;'! .. �r__. r • 77 .;. .r1 ,., ..,,. .^.....--,�,, ry(:.;.,�,.;k`p.:� ��;','wh•4 .,-«a-c..^ :,r "'`J _r,ti`Ai1+'°` 'n�"""t*x •.....,..c:2-.t. - II ■ ■ ■ 1 14•t•'b,r .a _ ' I ` 1 , nr �1 I --I' �. -•• _ t `�•• - wt�! •M' T�J� li �:I 1J J` i��A��lwl � �� gF��t�if � /`-��_ � � _'s• ����,�' 1y'�1 115 1 :it A.� `1 i F ��. 'f ti 'j i.. y i� - �i� � � •a 'r�;, 1 ,� '�' i r�j.� t �;� ,i,,.lrf' (,.I �,y11 �� •r � 11 I I .,i,, l �• . 1 e 1• 9 •-�i! k.., _ � . -.:. � � ., ril 1 ' '�•- �l,. -.1�� { 1�d e•. '��I ,J:� � I.� �� �e -'� 1 Sa�l� rl,e II ` ` D � yid ` f Iry �4' ate•. ,,f,i � y 3. . ��t tVA rk II { jai v "Ali �� ► , isms �T L � ' fll , f n m �.° > ; r ' .a psr raw 11 Fai ter, 5 '"+ �,� �•�- " _ r xch r 1 • 1 • 1 • 1 1 II ABBREVIATIONS SCHEDULES PROJECT DIRECTORY ❑ _. 1 RAP. radio: Asir. bove 6A yage REF. r fe sate/roper to GLIENTI SMALL AND LARGE FRIES L.L.G.REF,p PP. above iInbbd floor V' 9alro�r•al I�conlractar r trIae.ter rzES. e I0- Ufrt�I�C ADDRESS: 1265 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE SUS Healo� GL Id S. wau bowel RERP. r Ignroreo RES. 'ssillent MARK Fi II7RBTPPE MANDE CAT.. TRIM LAW NOTES ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 j ADJ. Qddnbnal RtT. !urn T .e 0170)125-5170 ADJ. adJacern HDBD. hardboard RA.. return air - I _ BY INI'ERlORS ADJ/ST. a tabb WAD hardwaro REV, right h /ravlx A66. aggregate HD{'✓D hardwood RH. right hand _ '. AG air eerdltkming HDR header ROA rk,ht of way B EXTERIOR FIXTURE TBA ALT. altempte HTS. heakng ryry tae CONSULTANTS: ALUM. aluminum HJAC heatingNentllabon( RD. �oo0 drain --�-- ❑ I ANCH, aner.r anehorogo ameordnlankg RM. - sxtNrEUORS STRUCTURAL: ENERGY ANALYSIS: Ma A.A ian APPROx.are.d,mate NT. height RO fO1�1 OP°"h'g BY INTER1oRS KAUP ENGINEERING,INC. BIOSPAGES ARCH, orchneat(waU HEX hexog I .. AD. dram HB, h Mbb I' �'.��' Itlf°{ R _ AD. aaohalltb N.C. In sore E BATHPAN/uGHr PANASOI4IC Architects,P.C. au HO hoilaw metal STIED. ached b P.O.BOX 2235 0504 CRYSTAL CIRCLE ta. horireMal STS- !mg F SLOPED CAN HALO H7451CAT 457W 75W R30 GLENWOOD SPRINGS,Co. 61602 GARBONDALE,CO.61623 50 River Oaks Lane HSMT, baeemeM hR how 5HT. .1.11 ERs, bsarmg HRPL hot water heater sicMir. a{m°a,•t G SLOPEDDIREc ZONAL (170)145-1613 FAX: (170)0145-1633 (170)963-0114 Basalt,Go.81621 STYK botw.en SC. eo7ln- CAN HALO H7451CAT 89 150WR40 SEV.-- bevel(ed) INT.. Irobtle(In S.T.C. �ou w trmambalon :r' `�. (970)•379.6067 g7 x FIATRECESSSOCArI �a� -HALO. �J HS4)lET +>Lf,P 1g)d .aLnWet.L 75WR30 �(et9VAIy GRADING AND DRAINAGE ❑ L BIM4. bitummoe ID. I-I O n) eoank:lenk - BJK block INT. Insulate Ong) 5 :oath I DIRECr10NAL HAW HAi1CT 425W SOW R30 ELKS. bbakmg INT. Interior SPKR .peokar RECESSED CAN JEROME GAMBA AND ASSOCIATES,INC. b•a"d INV. Inver! SPED. ,p-1114.km(s) T - -.- _ ISSUE: BUILDIN6 PERMIT.q-20-gq p! CABLE IIOIiT P.O,BOX 1456 - SHELL PACKAGE II-10-qq gamomm BA. b�okLam of 93. ° maloes::eel p BLvs. bxlldhq , ,o4it filer 5a .t-ddanrd L UNDER CAB.LIGHT AMER.FLUORESCENT TL/ru SERIES I CONSTRUCTION DOG'S.: GLENWOOD SPRINGS,CO GO 61602 JST. ,obt - STL. steel M BATH FAN PANASONIC (170)145-2550 GAB. wbinat STOR storage 02-IS-00 CPT sae®t K1T. klkehen SD. stain drab N SHOWER llGHT HALO H7UICAT-170 170 60WA19 j ' e5MT. ca oat 5TR!GT. strucWre/.".tural C.S. catty ba.In K.O, knock out SUSP, suspended P FLUORESCENT C OLS. calling SYK ayrmetrkal 4'X4'LIGHT SHEET LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CLS.HT, oellelg height LBL. krbel SYN aydh.tI. ILLUMINATING er _ GEM. c--h LAB laboratory SYS. system R S}gp)BnrypygpLIGHT EXPER1FXE IEIESOLO •454 l•J7)I GM centM.ter LAM. I_Il a. SLOPED SHOWER - TEL. tole HALO H7451CAT 83 20OW AD r�R �b LA left hand PM1O"O R- ucHr __ AO.I COVER SHEET AND PROJECT INFORMATION G.T. b tll° LT. light T.V. tVV.k( m HALOGEN SOW 12V GLR clear(aroe) LTY T. II k we t TMG, thick old S HALO H7LYr 2412P T.O. clo.oY TrR khreshold DRtECCIONAL ISOH[ MRI6 cot wlubi Ll airs Iood EXTERIOR RECESSED __ AI2 NEW SITE.PLAWLAND5GAPE DETAILS COMB. eembinakbn TPDI9P.tallek paper dl,permer T HALO H7UCT 30 PAT 75W A19 LONG. Gponcrete TOL. tolerrnu CAN NaR. manuiaclura(ar) T.s tongue ana groove A2.1 LOWER AND MAIN LEVEL PLAN CMU. -te masaro-y unit MRS. masonry TB. towel bar I' d CONST. w Gvctbn MD. mason penlrg TA4. top of column rc� ry 22 UPPER AND ROOF PLAN �Z,y 21��,1 x •y k U w�' �ti t/ MATS., material° TOP. top of conaroka v ca.oser ucHrs HALO HIT Toe It4z A3.1 ELEVATIONS �r'Grh•G CONT'R ntracL/contrackar MAX na Imam TOP. top of footing CO comer gg d NiECtf. moahamwl r.0,1 top oP,olak W s7FSUGHr BEGA zzsa 1- FLUOR oxsLl.IILAR A3.2 ELEVATIONS U7PP71z 2Z�•(p 'fy 7 PARR aerrvgated MO. mec!WI wbhet T tread GTR ,minter Nag. medlwl Tip, h*obal - "PT. "IelG foot MBR master b•drodn cu.YV. cubic yard HEW, membrane A4.1 BUILDING SEGTION5 Wri OIG` -V MTL motel U.B.O. Uniform Bulldln9 Code M,RD. metal roof docking uz. undercounler ASA WALL SECTIONS 4W LL DJ., deed load M ter UNPIN. unflnbhed 17ETxOL. demoll.h MIN mllihnotor PTL VIA detail MIN. minimum - DA6. dlaganal MIR mirror - VB, a barrbr AP ANCES__ nn, A6.01 WALL DETAILS �yb VIAM. diameter M61- mlecallarooe VAR vat DIV. division MOD. modular VJF. verify In field MARIS T]TH N CAT.NO. FINISH ApcESSOltnss All ROOF DETAILS - DR door N D. -Led V6 T. ire ticaI Ali WINDOW DETAILS DK' do- hung V6. vertical gram J � A6.04 DOOR AND WINDOW DETAILS =9•� D.S. dorvn .A M. ..Mal VN. `N"yl A OAS HEA7ilATOR DNR drawer NKIL. notSI 1 VCB. vlrgicavebmo B RREEFRIG. E SUBZERO MODEL 690 MATCHING EXTENDED WITH SIDE PANEL A'7AI FINISH PLAN--MASTER BATH/KITCHEN �gQZ.y- OWS.- drowlrg N.IC. not m contract PANEL HANDLE OP. _2Inmkinngg}euntaln _ N.T.S. not fe:sale A7.1 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS y $•5 C •5� _ PA du,hwashar WC. rvater.twat C OVENS THERMADOR CM 302 STAINLESS PROFESSIONAL - E ...t OP6. opening W LP• -Id.d rvI-fabrb D COOICTOP THERMADOR SGCS365A STAINLESS HANDS A"7.12 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A'1.13 NOT USED ML. :e t (aU OD. opposite P .lath/wkr. STEEL A7.14 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS EL. elevation OD. au 11 diamatar KK window M.W. olovakar OA overall W.W.M. welded wiro mash E VENT THERMADOR CV536 STAINLESS VTR3000R "IRIS iBAR1iMOTE EM IL", a rgency O.N. overhead Ave without STEEL VENTILATORop17oN A5.1 LOWER AND MAIN LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING/ELECTRICAL PLAN ra onelaao(wo) WD. woad F DIEPOSAL BY PLUMBER IHP MOTOR MIN. A6.2 UPPER AND ROOF REFLECTED CEILING/ELECTRICAL PLAN ESC. q_1 t r _ FID. painted 5T1-COLS USPD A9 ABBREVIATIONS: SUBZERO MODEL 245 MATCHRJO REF.MANUF.FOR PANEL. 4-1 ESC. a as t. PM- parcel REAJFA PANEL- THICxNESS • ExCAV.,ex_tte PAR parallel 4 angle H WASHER MAYTAG MAH4000 BISGLas.. pxpT^ 51.1 FOUNDATION AND MAIN LEVEL FRAMING PLAN centeruro EXIST. 0 1 uig � p�tion C cha-I DRxER MAnAO McD40oo Btscx'7B .;• 52.1 UPPER LEVEL AND ROOF FRAMING PLANS EM. exterior PJMT. pavement d pemg P5RF. perforated �- Perpenalc0- - 53.1 DETAILS - PA. Pace W,frame opening P °• PI��rta'' Fide er 53.2 DETAILS O PIN. f ash(ed) 11 I �U ? FIN. PI bh:d floor FL plotklc lanhate II Para° FEG. fire exangulsher cabinet p1F. pounds per lineal foot o deyeey IVre -1 FLBHG. f�a,�img MY plointad MATERIAL INDICATIONS ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS FUR.. flexbb P.VA. pot 11 chloride RR Floor PREFAB. abrkated F.D. naardram PfB - ._" - GENERAL NOTES IL- fiLDR fluore.unt PREFIN. prefmiohed .! , h FOUND. faundabon PS.P. pound.per square foot MASONRY, ° D/MO fir: E �00-0 PS.I. pounds per°OYaro Inch fliO�r A COWTMOPa t ( 6J-_ FRS. PramN SAtm/MARTAR/ FROFEfny IS SU9JEGT TO h@ CONDITIONS OF ORDINANCE TI(SERIE5 OF 14q'V Lu FH.o. Fwnlahgd W okharo FIREBRICK ® PLASTER I��J Lu wRL Purred OrgJL qwr y FACE BOCK . fill. fuMe 0.7. r Cite p]7777T/]� MI:TK, � - }, �GRANTINS APPROVAL POR A HISTORIC LOT SPLIT. e �LLLLLLd NORTH Y -THE HPA.HA5 GRANTED OLLOWINS VARIAN:E9 rf7'(e 0 o GtrA t18 �r�o -A 7'COMBINED FRONT AND YARD SETBACK VARIANCE'" , ` d CERAMIC TILE AWMIKH ® "D `. -A 39'PEST SIDEYARD„SARI/9JGE , x® aaxnwnae met® none ... -- zr.rr Inn aor� CONCRETE: LAL ROE SCALE ® - Yrarr PaNeM -A 5'WEST 51DEYARD-9ETBACK VARIANCE FOR LGHTWELL9 H.IC -A I'EAST 51DEYAR,;SETSK.K VARIANCE1»� Ntw aR femll®roux //-�\ WMPIS tSGTial CONCRETE BLOCK STEEL- ® fl •� e,evnnao \au7 R�atict oRiraxs Nn.epe 1 T}.�°, t4RO51'�'p,IGKVARIANGE �J Y -A 9.9'COMBIN��E}D"1 ��33--4 / ,wevn aoonr/mess�aeraewl SMALL SCALE ,�pp -PER HFO.AP $V TVE POLLOWINS C�BDRISNS SHALL BE MET, andP PRECAST GE I POW. caxraxo ` L�. nut awnox ca euwwmx I.Tiro same:,h1do, ybw WSh are typladtWV�terlon er propeniea - ,wa r. r..twac \``II�yWW I row :� xr.r swoxax° wit oemaaatw/xouz �d PRECAST S a °AN'"°"°1'�' ' m Aspen antl ehwld het r'ytahed..'Ihmy d� p rated Iorion �m kes - ,� ;.sr wit wit LISHTM16W FINISH ® e °A'Ana+ialev ox xr�sloe a , the Muss b b°mg rewedWd^iwt tMy d'�e replaeaed er the eie . z sr wa c' r r �•g A9 maa.a+axnws,s ' .one,namer tf:q!th a ty exist. r' saw r•:s ew.V,Y wit wit. LAUD win r nuV�' sa'OOORW/al.�m.vapt � - � ^ r EARTI'IY'(ORIC, RBLY�.6:GONTIWO!/F�® �s��vnnaelmeo al xex sme e rae•ma42 axnWNS iasay -REFHt ro 51�TA9 FOft SGAPINS -- . saw zrsa• manse w mo. - ... - ,wn ra•.sr sits.: wit wa L DISTURBED DISCONTINUOUS ® t :.'" - • .^° •ban of th°fraR deoF•abng Y1& ke Stre_ot will iid7e be 1- s w. M�s exte k poa:ble by fr mg d -a photogropl. y N r .e ctwxspe - rwm.no�ieg x.vma UNDI57URBED PLYWOOD- Ta-1 eoxtlo ®n NaaeR -FRONT DOOR LOG1_TION HAS BEEN CONFIRMED AND APPROVED LAROE _ TEMPERED SCALE S.The de IW of the front door met be booed on a W,torla oxmnpie that:wets s re•.rr wit ones ia,IeaTewtaow STONE/GRAVEL T8.1PB2ED B a In t.T Ith'drawl to I- d tafP and monit6r. - ra•.rr wa xaawnn PORGVS PILL -��7 NARDeoARD . - aye ® r•a "9a •PPrav bJ• 4, A exygn hbtork wind:..m the Muse nook Its retdned,v4,er He hbtoric I -L _ - ❑ w""10661'°' INSULATION, PLASTER/BArx N9 Si - ° e wu .hwe.grwlau.l be.n removed r w r ne endow.Immt match»Tsai � PROJECT': rp:er w GATT/BLANKET fSrrx]IRSXIi SAND and G[9•�NT F'v 9sS:hi ewstdd erlgmathJ,de Lien In the dr"gs. _-- [YYT3.Y3.YEY1 TFL+_.-+::..:.J O �'!( -REFER TO YUIIDOW SCf¢pULE SMALL�AND LARGE FRIES ' LOOSE FILL 6RL/1T.MILL LA _ KALL GYPSUM - �'eere exm s.HPO..tan ond manor most ` RESIDENCE . w RI61D Y1g1-L BOARD I oppr•vo the tips and IocaU•n of all exterior IghWg Nxlwes when:elected a . wo v 4 tea: ,aa.t var. ma.me w/woe FINISH MATERIALS, MORTAR BOARD � � e. New ilu°e,no3 be added M She.ioeotbn shown an the approv o-awmp.The � DESCRIPTION: . Pbe.,hell be matol detailed in the mmner:typkal of miner':cottage,Intl •r.er w. wit .torsos aAw A_Oat LVe race satin axes stoat ura lx va .tan and-nitor.Am be GENERAL INFORMATION ACOUSTIC TILE - OF°�ATOIG'WO'a1BD`r° �pr°aved.� \ 3'rzs8 wa W ® STONE, a,onry,ckp and or metal Need sock b ew! •r.sr neox,xs _ owe e,wrmaoaa SLABS ® STONE VENEER vuax n a onna oor uIe wx+.wmeem tvq T.No ebmenta-to 1.added to bin N:tob hwae that did not io ev ly exdt. ntY-Aa1 rH•.er rnmva w/wws- mace xx.a.wn 0o=rL.9 No s iethg exterior neleH I.o*,er than wMt has been apeeiRwl19 eppr-d ❑ I herein"N be re ,d.Nita the opproval W N.PA.,tan aM monks. CAULK std SEN.ANI'8, MARBLE ® _ SHEET: ox- I saamnr sits mD.Tmiaioaoe ro 111 - (iapNVp a.There ahou W no devwom.Rom the exterior elevoboro an approved wlthwt swam wo. '' SEALANT -.-.--- fkak bei .. wa WBAGKER FLOOR OOVERII ^B renewed and approved by HFO..t.?P and malts. e JOINT FILL.ER- t� � ILIRENTT TILE ® ° fir vMra onvosa - _ :Tw.SDFa•WRrVA.Y CARPET ® A s o l . i ,w a CORRUGATED METAL SIDING BRICK x C.M.U. X X AF-5T BLEEKFP, STREET El -CONCRETE SU13SLAB R,MT , EXPANSION-JONT WITH Mary A.Ajian ❑ FAINTED STEEL JOINT FILLER 0 COMPOUND Architects,P.C. BAR S!tTE-FIX IN PLACE MEMBRANE 50 River Oaks I- NATERPRoopINS IL Basalt,Co.81621 T, ril 11 11 11 11 I'PAjkTW ALUMINUM (97W79-6067 &RATE-SRATE NEW!Tft!FT OFF FOR 4-PATH reRESS AREA OF SNOW T__ ❑ 10B.-I sr. INTERMEDIARY ME �11_-,-­., ISSUE: :TAL �, * I AN6Lr SUPPORT HPO METAL ANGLE PoNc 'EPTUAL: 7-14--111 STEEL BAR 6RATNo BUILDING PERMIT: q-20-qq I/2'PLYWOOD METAL AN6Lr:-E30LT ,SHELL PA�CKASE, 11-10-ql INTO CONCRETE KALL CON5TRUCTION IL H.P.MEMBRANE A.D. L. KAJ_L_ C1 A.D. zzo,,�To-D�z�,N, L. MATCH WIDTH OF AT 5 CONCRETE WALL BELOW ............ r'taY r.o.ersr THIS PLANE To DRAINAGE FILL PARAL TO 5 T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXISTING CORRUGATED METAL SIDING LOCATIO L161-IDIELL AT r LlrHTkqF-LL AT BRICK STEPS SCALE Il/.2"=I'-O-- SCALE, AU E ­- NOOD SIDINO-- BOTTOM OF HISTORIC REP.ELEVATIO WALL STUDS NS AREA F`�,IF-+NMI LT-- 2459 WOOD SIVINS --------—-- t AdN T. COPPER FLASHING AND 0OUNTERPLASH11119 COFFER FLASHING V.Ij- Mc_Rr5S WATCH I'FAINTED ALUMINUM V PAIN=STEEL BAR GRATE AT r=6RESS AREA OF T_ 2 BAR GRATE--FIX AREA ONLY_-SRATE To Sqh SP, IN PLACE LIFT OFF FOR EGRESS TOMERIC, ALANT METAL AISLE, II PAINTED ALUMINUM FINISHED GRADE-C"ItATE-&RATE JONT FILLER TO LIFT OFF FOR REP.IAI.2 EGRESS DRAINAGE r PRAINA 4 l 50L'!� Q!MATT-I I' i THI Lu ANCHOR TO Lu INTERMEDIARY METAL CONNECT TH /2' 4 MIN.TRIG�W­ -1�6 C-OLIXOTI N PIPE PRO ISTIN ROSE ANSLE SUPPORT 4 DAMP PROOF BUSH AATERPR oor SHEET METAL At.*LE-- MEMBRAf B-CONTINUE CONCRETE WALL--REF.STRUI LAO To STUDS ID*ABOY E BRICK PORCH I-ETAL rL'61 INS MAX A METAL LAD APA MA INE GRADE DER RUNS CLOSURE' PLYY4001--CONTINUE To CORRIJOATED METAL 12'A50 TOP OF'BI;UrK 51DIN6 CIMT,.11.0=1!,UT5 TO PORCH C P400D FRAMIN&- REP.TO DRAINAd MITIOAT LL MATCH Y41PTH OF N PLAN FOR PIPE CONCRETE WALL I AU LAYOUT WOOD F IN&AT' r— AND PURRING AREA o 5N0 LT-- [ (5 LICHT�ELL AT HOOD SIDING EXTERIOR WALL AT ENTRY POR 5q LL a.TER 5rALF, 3".1'-0' \,AI�.2 SCALE. I I/2"=I'-O- AI,2 SCALE, 11/2'=I'-O- X V-6 5/4' STEEL BAR ITT DRAIN GHA OPERABLE PANEL IN .2.. PAR INS AREA FOR z 4'-0 1/4. LIGHTINELL ORATE— CONC WHEEL 5ToP THIS PANEL TO l 1 ORYYE 5� BAR 5/4' T!- T-F-T' BE V PAINTED ALUMINUM TO AND ATION AR ORATE 2­7' WA FOUNDATION WALL To 'PAIN STEEL BAR AL.11511 EXTERIOR PACE OF I __ I- LI&HTrELL.WITH EXT.FAC. V.I.F. FOLLOW FOOTPRINT OF OF EXISTJNG BUILDING HISTORIC STRUCTURE NO ORATE DOWNSPOUT STEEL BAR-SUSPEND CONCRETE CURB SI FROM P.O.FINISH MATERIAL l i r 5T=L BAR PERMANENTLY AFFIXED DEN SATE AS SHOWN METAL LADDER MEN ASPHALT DRIVEWAY fl PANEL IN PAINTED STEEL BAR 0 11 OPERABLE PANEL IN OPERABLE 1. --TO BE APPROVED BY H PROJECT: LIGHTYiELL&RATE- LIGHWELL&RATE-- ORATE ALLEY WOOD PENCE THIS PANEL To THIS PANEL To FACE OF NEVi FOUNDATION BE!I'PAINTED ALUMINUM M I'PAINTED ALUMINUM SMALL 4 LARGE FRIES BAR GRATE PERMANENTLY Afr-ixEv PERMANENTLY AFFIXED METAL LADDER METAL LADDER AREA. DAR&RATE RE51DENcE rt1 _U'.j.-1..1-1. Ivc STOOP TOTAL T I'PAINTED STEEL BAR —————- BRICK STEPS DESCRIPTION: ORATE SITE PLAN STEEL ANGLE TO ATTACH FADE OF NEW FOUNDATION TO FOUNDATION WALL FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION (3 SHEET. 13 CONCRETE CURB NEST LI&HTNELL PLAN MEDIA 100 L16HTNELL PLAN (�:2 B DROOM 112 LIOHTKELL PLAN NEW SITE FLAN SCALE: 1/4" V-0" SCALE: 1/4" �.2 E,1'-0" \ � 5C]AL 1/4" 56ALE: Ilb" A I NEW BRICK PORCH AND STEPS ❑ 9 I/2' 13 V2' 5'-0 V4' 9 V2• 6'-0• A NEW ENTRY DOOR IN HISTORIC LOCATION ORIGINAL WINDOW TO REMAIN-- OK REGLAZE BROKEN PANE � 1 , F -- - N ' REMOVE ORIGINAL I O -2' 6 O t ° 13 rz' '9.' a FRAMING- RETAIN rXIST NG 5 Mary A.Avian 4I D :m 7x6 FRAMING oo e s T Po Architects P.C. u ^ WDER• Ar.D B TH BEDROOM ® � > ^ IIO Ill S LIVI NG S EN _ I 50 River Oaks lane I zoo m - Basal Co. 81621 • 201 r.o.vLr. •S 5 �' +; s,nr�• m (970}379-6067 O m 0 O m FN. 312', 56V S, 51/2 91/2' FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS • 4 9.6 -FV4' AND ANGLE OF FOUNDATION S' 119/4' . Y4 B/4' - I Y I^ 5 ,• p UNDER HISTORIC PORTION OF HOUSE a S LL: O� ISSUE: K ^ a`T yr HPG NIORKSESSION: T-4-99 312'm mGLOSer m I 28 o HPG CONCEPTUAL: 7-28-aq ^ log I z' 4'6' c.vr. HPG,FINAL:,B-II-11 . Van. a BUILDING PERMIT: 4-207-11 m ----------------°---------®--------- ---'- 73 PLANNING: 9-29-q9 218' m 0 ALGN FRAj I ING:.II.-?3-1q s' s O I CENTER __ I Q CONSTRUCTION DOG'S: BEDROOM 2 2° g'-91/4' 9 LI i OPENIR 6 i I LIGHTWELL 02-15-00 . lO'1 I 51/2' VE5T. IEOUAL 8'-II' EGJAL I I K TGHEN b 7 203 I e OF EXISTING RIDGE I I m ATE WALL BASED ON I^ OOOTRI OTION I I IS NG DO O :p T IS DIMENSION--ADJUST DIM aLv YORK POINT OR TO BE FIXED A REEOUIRED 107 AND 103 wr Q I D2012G I 4 100 LIGHTY✓ELL e m m HALL I'-IY O 26'-6 114, I 00 I'-0 I NEW BR1GK u; I STEPS AND LANDING - S a LI ^e BU w_T H G § BUILT IN GAB A11 I �O EXISTING CONS ION TO REMAIN M.I L BELOW--LINE OF SILL I 51/2• . I'-R .S/A6.03 EGk V' 1 I NEW CONSTRUCTION 514 vi 4 3 9/4• s 12' I m .. _ I � e sKrttGHr 0'S 0 REF- � OF O� BEDROOM I ABOVE S I O l09 I I < � (� I Lu 6 1 Q -- 7-'LhSTER SA DN. j A9l n +-✓I uSi _J T ^ ry I 204 . a LNRORY H _ 204 -A- •�pp I s CLOSET ° rl D." c+PJrE a G I V GLO -&-- O. Oe ��. M� A" ^ 4,,; III pI I-!_. —� p r I I I o.car. tL V V"' s 12'm K V2• ,R N.I p-4, I a a • raa ry PROVIDE FRAMING >�Y ^� UY 64 U2' 10'-0 9'-lO V2' - -_ ueO I �r D AND INAL4noN - L i m2 •11/2 n _HOSE BIB 01 FOR Z LL��y r -1 T IO I u I ---- ----------s -------e� - ---- _ Lu BAT^maA3 -Lv Q �.13 I I-6' II-o• 15 , T 5V A $.,� 'l 19'-I' AS • U '_ + I LIN OF WALL c I O I AIGi 2 MI SELF I D G 051 DooR I j 5' 2,•g. �v O Y3° s.eaw• � I I = E �'_ � � I P § r < a' m p I I FD n m O SEWER E.JEG OR -- V 12 m PROVIDE v NONAL I tog l . rn LAV. pp � MEDIA Al INSt IWq•LL 03 n lar lol AI K v 100 �' - I ❑ m l I h e I I PROJECT: ° y T e o. - \----- - - � ACCESS HATCH � SMALL 8 LARGE FRIES RESIDENCE • 94 '1' A. '" I. lO m n LI6HTM✓eLL A7al Avl § DESCRIPTION: 3oe n MAIN 4 LOWER LEVEL PLAN m 1'YM1-A31 19•g V2' 4 4'-0 914• 2'-0• 5b 12' S'-0 12' �2 V2' s'-II U2' S'-II V2' ❑ ❑ sw v2° SHEET: Ma GENERAL NOTES 1441 22' II'-II' 1-10 U4• u .. DOOR ONE-0H OPENINGS WHICH ARE NOT DII-1£N510t�D SHALL BE LOCATED IN CENTER OF 54'-g 3/4' a 2 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN --FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS INDICATED AND BRING ���• Az.1 scALE, t/4.='.o DISCREPANCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT. \'A2.1�3 �I MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2.1 SCALE, /4'=I'-O' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ CRISINAL.STRUCTURE WITH NEW ASPHALT 5HINSLM Mary A.Avjian Architects,P.C. ---------------------------- -------- 50 River Oaks lane Basal,Co.81621 (970)379,6067 ❑ ISSUE: ❑ HP qq HP6 CONCEPTUAL:EP A 7-28—q9 PUILDIN &FERMITI. PLANNING: cf7217-1'1, SHELL PACKAGE: 11-10-111 q2715-00 NEW CRICKET reJ ks) Lu SKYLIGHT -----------------------=--, ---------—------- MECHANICAL FLUE CHASE --NEW MECHANICAL FLUE 5,12 NEW METAL ROOF METAL GUTTER(TT-) DOWNSPOUT(Typ) 34'-63/4' Lu 7— z Lu OPEN To 5ELo ASPHALT SHIN&LeS To 14W BELOW, IYt '-4 5112, _----------- ------------------ -DN OPEN TO BELOW 1212 INSIDE FACE 0 OPWER 4 12,1 - T T PROJECT: euo 4,�! I I I SMALL & LARGE FRIE5 RESIDENCE 4 DESCRIPTION: _ i! UPPER AND ROOF PLAN 4L6 V2' 19'-4 314• SHEET- ROOF PLAN 9/4' N'-9 0 51-ALE. 1/4"=I'-O' 56-HIGH dUAR0RA'L I UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SGALE, 1/4'=1'-O' A 20, 13 ❑ r—I -- -- ————®——— LINE OF SETBACK 1 i q4 I � POWDER CLVSET LIGE TWELL VESTIBIJ LE - — I 202 , I— 1 I I o i I I STAIR HALL O .> 208 1 ENTRY 0 F2-F1 I I YI L---------__ J Q I OFFICE WI KITCHEN+DINING 07 Lu ---- LL I 206 ____ GARAGE H 01 o — -- — — ----- 209 I U) -- ZI \ J - -- -� - _ Io LL -__- _ - __... w I 1 I LIVING F2-0-51 I � � I I I y I LIGHTWELL LINEOFSffBACK ---------------------� 021 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN -- _ SCALE:114"=1'-0' — - LINE OF SETBACK I 4•x7.; stal 1 sTxa o C) Q backporch / 6x39 / I X-9".6 3• 000 W.C. 000 36" garage m I 23'x kitchen d zrx1r U m• x s' �I IU W fire Q U)I - 1 U- O place -- H W 1 — m.bath O I U) Z I ---- 9'6"z 12'.6" I LL LL LU 1 ? 18'6"z 13'6• I dI•ning ' 1 15'x 12' L J _ _ l I m—d 13'6•x 6'6' 0 L m.bedroom 1]'x,4'6" — LINE OF SETBACK ��- 011 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:114"•1'-0' ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL 605 W.Bleeker,Aspen,Colorado P°SS F 1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN : Existing + New Main Level Floor Plans �- BCS FRST MAIX STREET ASPEN, CR IRRRRR SIX1I C E 4 R 1R !T)RTRAT M IN S IEI 97D/920 ERSR NORTH om NaiExx... ' 02.15.13 il Lit-_ 1 LINE OF SETBACK °°°---------------------------------� F # 7 r tix 1 � � it _� � �1 L l -� f� it 1 l ' C �� MASTER BED ��L_ -/ i '- �I l �L T* � ao4 LJ ti I L 11 t _I FIAr �I �J L u ILL x m� �1 ��. �I �LL JlL_ I =i r LL I - --. ���- I I _� .JA_�. I H__,.LLOIF=T FLAT I F- O _ _I r_ W ,�_, U HALL Z I L h ..I 301 1 O 11�i21� ,- � 1 ,1� � I w Ij r -F ff I �r � p l PT iil� -r i LJI__ me DECK 305` srAiR 1l I J fztz,; �I� — IJ Li 1 LJ I 1 l� L J Li J lJ . L.. IJ r.I 1 !I M.BATH I 302 --- ___ ______ L —— LINE OF SETBACK 021 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE:114"=1-0- [_ 1_ I T, ------ LINE OF SETBACK ----------------------- IL -lzixl x.ir F Ii OPEN i1a _ � - I 1 La - - I i Il�'�l I -� L_ !Ix� 1 �` II ' ] 11 it �� LI JAL office - } II .!.1L ,1 lil ( �� 1r�•:1rs' W1 �— a LL l ,— — — deck I 1 cwn LL —C= I I IO Z I -1�o' L J� L ! w ��l��f _r —� Iz I h J l open to il �ll- .. �.�I�II �IJ111 r(iT ,T below i� II F] 31 JL J -L ILL I I L J J J h-- U„ I jLI��I_ Ll JAL J I ' �1JL1 L LL �w .liJ 1 1 .I . ,I. L ----------------- C _! LINE OF SETBACK °— i i I i i i 011 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:114•7'-0' ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL 605 W.Bleeker,Aspen,Colorado poss O S C H E M A T I C D E S I G N : Existing + New Upper Level Floor Plans 605 701 M11X STREET 15REX, COLORADO R1R11 0 2 q R ,R 1T19]0/925 4755 til Oi0/920 2950 NORTH 02.15.13 —— �� - LINE OF SETBACK __ _ J fiF L - L r z � -3 �� r� � r 1 _ .I1 �rJ a �r r Lr = I 7r r 7rr- - L ; !� , �'ir ri a t, fit-i I.I I I . 1 Ili I. III t r F i11 1 _I r r ' I 1 I C r r tlu �.I J I iI z, aI II L— r LJ L - LL U W , r ,_. - II I.�ull 11'l[1 J� �JI.., .. ,JI c J L J l J u I I I l_I J-�— — _J a I — I LLI L FAT I LL cc ° I r G r u II { II ILL W I I`r- I J - �` II l - c II . ILL .I I I iI I Ir I 1 ^ . I ill 11 flit . ;J �r i,•I`IT c hot deck oecK II FAT J - � 'r I u it r 11 F3051�!xzso° ❑ 305 L 1 io:,z L j"I II .. ' I L°III.' J.II,I I — — L L r .w LI LE L u J J L� Li� J L � I I � � � j `I I. till J — - ---- II��--� I IL_�I �,�__ � JL L1�>✓� IIII--� I' --------------- T- ! li LINE OF SETBACK 021 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SCALE'114'=1'-0° r---- J ------ LINE OF SETBACK —————— — —— ———— � LJ lL,zl,z � � � rzfr � —f LL - - �r. -� I L u -f! = F - I I r_ ; jl to rr2 2125 3.TZ- TF i t r rn �r L [ I L s lJ � r r m r � -- I — - I �FL r .' � �, � I - LLB _ LI� Li L _LI IL ��—1 1 YI , LI, Ju 1 1 - � i aI � � I — rl i - � ' �I I� � , � f I 1 < I LL r rJ.� wl L z r - L : Flo z I� II Iii' I I 7F t L L _ �I - I 11 �I it r. 1L LL _LL], 1 ll _ LLLi u 1 J u J IIF] l L_ Lu.I i. ji u _ III + I i l I1 II 1 1 hill _ IJ (' . L I U-1 _J__ � (; � � I;I� � ( f � r< � ' i LL ulll IT _JJJ Lu L L Ll ---------------- �_ J — __ t-' ".I 1 I. J L_II._I = i Lt _ LINE OF SETBACK =r r" " L — k } — 1 EX - � ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL 0 ISTING ROOF PLAN SCALE 1'-0 714'- ' 605 W.Bleeker,Aspen,Colorado P°SS A""'".. SCHEMATIC DESIGN : Existing + New Roof Plans , IT) EAST MAIN STREET CB LORA99 81811 IT19T0/928 4185 (f)9]992 2959 NOTH 02.15.13 —————— LINE OF SETBACK LIGHTWELL " I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BEDROOM#3 HALL 114 107 I I I POWDER ILI � I LAUNDRY F-1-0-1-1 Y I � 109 I I � MEDIA ROOM I mI ., 7100 Ii 0 / rn I I W I O BATH#3 w 11 I o z Iw - ------ J IJ O BEDROOM#2 BEDROOM#1 CLO041 j \ I 113 110 1031 MECH�_, I 108 I \ I!! I BATH#2 I 111121 ------ I i I CLOSET P I j111 i' BATH#1 _/ J S E 6 LIGHTWELL L----------------- -------- — E — ---J LIN OF S ETBACK 021 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN SCALE:114-=1'-O' LINE OF SETBACK I � Y CmJ I I I I I •• —O— \ \i",¶IC I ' ,I a well hall bedroom#1 4'x 16'L' 13'-6"x 13' L —� vest. meth. 6-6"x 8'-9" media°4-s"x zo'-z i and CD W.C. bath#1 LL 3"xT-9" bedroom#2 bedroom#3 x I I I I I I I I I U v¢i 4'- xla ' a's xla' LL LU p O z Z light well J T1 IShow I o l J I r tub CI. 6'.s' O I bath#2 s x s� o o w.o. L I I12'-3'x10' O I � 13'x5' tub bath#3 13'x 10'-10" \ Iow I light well I---- ------ ------- 8 — tub ---J — LINEOFSETBACK 011 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL SCALE:114'•1'-0' 605 W.Bleeker,Aspen,Colorado po$$ O S C H E M A T I C D E S I G N : Existing + New Lower Level Floor Plans 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORA00 61911 0 2 4 9 Ifi n+e y _ IT)9701925 4755 (F)0101920 2950 NORTH 02.15.13 _ j �-'aw T.O.RIDGE®2012 NEW ADDITIO26N* a 1 .3 ______T.O..RIDGE O HISTORIC HOUK- +118.00� I� it T.0_FlNISH FLOOR 0 MAIN LEVE +100,00 2 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION ,A _T_0.RIDGE•1999 NON-HISTORICADDITIONS� x124.00 Y ______TA.RIDGE O HISTORIC HOUSE +118.00 : T.0_FlNISH FLOOR 0 MAIN LEVELI •1•. - +100.00 �1 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL 605 West Bleeker,Aspen,Colorado 81611 POEM N HITWK.MRE)F'[aNNING HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW: ELEVATIONS a NOS FAST WNM 5IIIFET IISPFN,MI(Fi11NO NINA m 9)0 1 323 mss i F I Nm)N20 28Sa 2011 ,,E February 15,2013 P . #� _ e! _ _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_— __ T.O.PARAPET 02012 NEW ADDITION —_—_ +126.3 - T.O..RIDGE O HISTORIC HOUSE T.O.RIDGE O HISTORIC HOUS +113.00 e T T.O.FINISH FLOOR O MAIN LEVE PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION - 1/4'=1'-0' 4 �r T.O.RIDGE O 1999 NON_HISTORI%L ADDTION +124.0 'tom �►�.. � ❑� ?` '16 lfti�� ° s _—_T_0.RIDGEOHISTORICHOIJ T_0.RIDGE O HISTORIC HODS _—_—_ —_ +113.00 i El hh 4 .f ff lCl1........1 ....:� T.O_DNISH FLOOR O MAIN LEVEL +100.00 n EXISTING EAST ELEVATION ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL 605 West Bleeker,Aspen,Colorado 81611 pOSS jqT('rijPF 4 P1,4NNING 606EASTIMINSTREET ASPEN,E%NOM6661611 HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW: ELEVATIONS ■ Er1 aTO r azs ays6 1 P 1 wo T fizo zno ,2011 vm�urwr.o"`",aEwc,i February 15,2013 -—-—-— ®" /�`E T.O.PARAPET 0 2012 NEW ADDITION _—_—_—_—___— i s--—_—_ Y x126.3 __ TA.RIDGE O HISTORIC HOUS� ___—_._—_. _—_— ____ __—_—_—_ +118.00 —___—_-T-r • T.O..RIDGE O HISTORC HOUS�+113.00 :7 y. ji t _-----------_—T.0_FINISH FLOOR@ MAINLEVE +100.00 2PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 1/4'=1'-0' _ - +124.00 f 7 �. �__.__—_—_—___—_—_T_O.RIDGE@ HISTORIC HOUSE 1. i ----"- - ------ -- --- --- _—_—_—_ T.O..RIDGE O HISTORIC HOUSEL • +113.00 7 't' I ------_—_---_-7.0_FINISH FLOOR O MAIN LEVE+ +100.00 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL _ 605 West Bleeker,Aspen,Colorado 81611 POSS AkCHI1ECTURE+PLANNING 17)970lwllmm F) maM 200 HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW: ELEVATIONS DI s70 7 as ma I n>N r tl0 xeo 0 2011;, M ,,� February 15,2013 T.O.RIDGE O 2012 NEW ADDTIONS +126.3 • __T_0.RIDGE O_HISTTORIC HOUS +118.00 T.0_FINISHFLOOR O GARAGE�{ +101.253 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION ti'S E O 1999 NON=HISTORIC ADDITIONS +124.00 T.O.RIDGE O HISTORIC HOUSE�L -------+118.000 AmI. `' _ T.O.FINISH FLOOR O GARAG +101.25 1 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4'=1'-0' ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL 605 West Bleeker,Aspen,Colorado 81611 POSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING �,,,,,T11,R,,,,�T UK .1s„ HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW: ELEVATIONS ' IT)amiaa OM Irlerorato mw o so11'.w,wut.o,,.Ne..;. March 1,2013 y Re t� - -- ;� T.O.RIDGE O 2012 NEW ADDITIONS .K` r y +126 1 l _ T.O.RIDGE O HISTORIC HOUSE - � r .•�y)�y... +'7's�� v - ._ ._ ....:. —_—_—_—_+116.00 -f > x i T.0_FINISH FLOOR O GARAGEn_ +101.25 nPROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4'=1'-0' j � 0 1999 NON-HISTORIC ADDITION +124.00 1 =..-, -Tr-r -T- 4.– ,-•-.T _T_O.RIDGED HISTORIC HOU�* if7�,y �T�r aJ +118.00 � (: 7 J T Blt li T.O_FINISH FLOOR O GARAG_E�_ +101.25 li I 1 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL 605 West Bleeker,Aspen, Colorado 81611 posEP6TNWN STREET ASPEN.-0-8$611 HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW: ELEVATIONS ' I11—1315 4156 IEI 9101— 1.o C)ton February 15,2013 I 5 I \ _ r IN PROPOSED SITE PLAN ROTH RESIDENCE REMODEL 605 West Bleeker, Aspen,Colorado 81611 pOSS 1HrHrl o 603 FAST NMM{IIIFET HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW: SITE PLAN A9HN,WtINUW ei611 Ill—/M 9]33 If)910/930 3950 M'NIH °mil,N,;,_,w,:,�;,:.;a,,,., February 15,2013 poss GG� WEST BLEEKER STREET A tlfr f� c E��EMES WoCO O E $ I O� cu i w ,r4m ROTH REMODEL EEEE � � 3 � 605&ttker SL BI611 LOT F w SITE PLAN "`a�sasnw-am_-_ ALLEY BLO A-001-Z 24 035 �(z-A H PG possf 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 RECEIVED MEMORANDUM DEC 18 ZO12 TO: Amy Guthrie City of Aspen HPC Czar CITE( OF ASPEN CC: File COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: Keith Howie Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. DATE: December 11, 2012 RE: Roth Remodel HPC Application ❑ ENCLOSURE 121 North 5th Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Dear Amy, Please find enclosed the conceptual HPC application for 121 North 5th street. This development sits on a corner lot at the juncture of 5th and West Bleeker. Because of this condition, this development is listed in the City of Aspen Building Department as 605 West Bleeker. Per HPC instructions, we have included 1 copy of the following: Attachment 1: Signed fee agreement Attachment 2: Applicants signed letter of representation Attachment 3: Current Certificate of title insurance Attachment 4: Pre-application conference summary Attachment 5: Copy of HPC Ordinance 27, (Series of 1999) and HPC prior approval for the property We are providing you with 10 copies of the following Attachment 6: Written description of the proposed development Attachment 7 : 8-1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the city of Aspen Attachment 8: Wet Stamped Site improvement survey by Aspen Survey Engineers Attachment 9 : graphic Description of proposed development Attachment 10: List of property owners within 300' for public hearing. We will provide the HPC with a list of the property owners within 300' of the proposed development within the next 48 hours. If there are additional materials required, please contact me at 925.4755 x 284 Respectfully submitted, 4 eith Howie Authorized representative for 605 West Bleeker LLC. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative — meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner(e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. 1 1 1 GYJ3J� 2°t 444eC- COMMUNITY � � D 0 N_ Agreement to Pay Application Fees DEC 18 2012 CITY OF ASPEN Anagreement between the city of Aspen ("city")and COMM!!e7il LOPMENT Property Phone No.: 970.925.4755-Keith Howie, Kim Owner Property 605 West Bleeker LLC. Email: khowie(a�billposs.com kweilCcilbillposs.com Address of 605 West Bleeker Billing Poss Architecture+ Planning Property: Aspen, Colorado, 81611 Address: 605 E.Main Street (subject of (send bills here) Aspen, Colorado, 81611 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 6 deposit for $1.890 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$315 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Pr e Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: David Roth for 605 West Bleeker LLC. Title: Authorized Agent City Use: Fees Due:$ Received:$ City 01 of Aspen 130 1) 920-5090 poss RE CEIVED DEC 18 2012 0171' OF ASPEN December 6, 2012 "MM1117Y DEVELOPMENT Amy Guthrie City of Aspen Historical Preservation Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen,Colorado, 81611 Re: Letter of representation,Roth Remodel-605 West Bleeker Street,Aspen, Colorado Dear Amy, Please accept this letter as my permission to allow the following: Kim Weil+Keith Howie +other representatives of Poss Architecture+ Planning 605 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 970-025-4755 To act on my behalf for the above referenced project.The property in question is described as follows: Lot A Small and large Fries Subdivision, According to the Plat recorded December 15, 1999 In plat book 52 at page 19 ParcelID# 273512487001 Sincerely, v David Roth 605 West Bleeker LLC 201 N.Mill Street, #203 Aspen, Colorado, 81611 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN: CO 81611 (t)9701925-4755 (f)9701920-2950 WWW.BII_LPOSS.COM PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, THIRD FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-1766/970-925-6527 FAX TOLL FREE 877-217-3158 WIRING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL TRANSACTIONS REGARDING THE CLOSING OF THIS_FILE ARE.AS_FOLLOWS.; ALPINE BANK-ASPEN 600 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, CO. 81611 ABA ROUTING NO. 102103407 FOR CREDIT TO: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., ESCROW ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NO. 2021 012 333 REFERENCE:PCT23447W3/605 W BLEEKER, LLC AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION COMMITMENT 6-17-06 j WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE HOME OFFICE 201 N.New York Avenue,Suite 200 Winter Park,Florida 32789 Telephone:(4071 629-5842 ' Pitkin County Title, Inc. Privacy Policy We collect nonpublic information about you from the following sources: • Information we receive from you, such as your name, address, telephone number, or social security number; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliates, or others. We receive this information from your lender, attorney, real estate broker, etc.; and Information from public records We do not disclose any nonpublic personal information about our customers or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information to provide the products or services requested by you or your lender. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that company with appropriate federal and state regulations. Notice of Privacy__Policy of Westcor Land Title Insurance Company Westcor Land Title Insurance Company("WLTIC")values its customers and is committed to protecting the privacy of personal information.In keeping with that philosophy,we have developed a Privacy Policy,set out below,that will ensure the continued protection of your nonpublic personal information and inform you about the measures WLTIC takes to safeguard that information. Who is Covered We provide our Privacy Policy to each customer when they purchase an WLTIC title insurance policy.Generally,this means that the Privacy Policy is provided to the customer at the closing of the real estate transaction. Information Collected In the normal course of business and to provide the necessary services to our customers,we may obtain nonpublic personal information directly from the customer,from customer-related transactions,or from third parties such as our title insurance agents,lenders,appraisers,surveyors or other similar entities. Access to Information Access to all nonpublic personal information is limited to those employees who have a need to know in order to perform their jobs.These employees include,but are not limited to,those in departments such as legal,underwriting,claims administration and accounting. Information Sharing Generally,WLTIC does not share nonpublic personal information that it collects with anyone other than its policy issuing agents as needed to complete the real estate settlement services and issue its title insurance policy as requested by the consumer. WLTIC may share nonpublic personal information as permitted by law with entities with whom WLTIC has a joint marketing agreement.Entities with whom WLTIC has a joint marketing agreement have agreed to protect the privacy of our customer's nonpublic personal information by utilizing similar precautions and security measures as WLTIC uses to protect this information and to use the information for lawful purposes. WLTIC,however,may share information as required by law in response to a subpoena,to a government regulatory agency or to prevent fraud. Information Security WLTIC,at all times,strives to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of the personal information in its possession and has instituted measures to guard against its unauthorized access. We maintain physical,electronic and procedural safeguards in compliance with federal standards to protect that information. The WLTIC Privacy Policy can also be found on WLTIC's website at www.wltic.com. ALTA Commitment For Title Insurance ES1rC:C >n LANE) TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY - - - - - - - - - - AUTHORIZED AGENT: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. 3FuFLOOR ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970-925-1766-PHONE 970-925-6527-FAX 877-217-3158-TOLL FREE E-MAIL ADDRESS: TITLE MATTERS: CLOSING MATTERS: Tom Twitchell - (tomt @sopris.net) TJ Davis - (tjd @sopris.net) Joy Higens - (joy @sopris.net) Issued By WES'TCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Home Office: 201 N.New York Avenue,Suite 200 Winter Park,FL 32789 Telephone(407)629-5842 WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ALTA Commitment Form(6-17-06) COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, a California Corporation,("Company'),for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements;all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company. All liability and obligations under this Commitment shall cease and terminate within six (6) months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed in facsimile under authority of its by-laws on the date shown in Schedule A. Issued By: WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY .ohs'+iy�s BY: resident Attest: rttECrz.lj� �cae Secretary Countersigned: -- Authorized Signature CO 1045 ** Pitkin County Title,Inc. 601 E.Hopkins#3 Aspen,CO 81611 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage", when used herein, shall include deed of trust,trust deed or other security instrument. 2. If the Proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the Proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien or encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named Proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or(b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the Proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the Proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is$2,000,000.00 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http:llwww.alta.org. COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: April 23, 2012 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT23447W3 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a)ALTA Owner's Policy-(6/17/06) Amount$3,700,000.00 Premium$6,495.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Standard 605 W BLEEKER, LLC (b)ALTA Loan Policy-(6/17/06) Amount$2,775,000.00 Premium$ 125.00 Proposed Insured: Rate:Companion BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS,AS THEIR INTEREST MAY APPEAR (c)ALTA Loan Policy-(6/17/06) Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: RANDALL A.WHITMAN 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOT A, SMALL AND LARGE FRIES SUBDIVISION,according to the Plat recorded December 15, 1999 in Plat Book 52 at Page 19. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE,INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E.HOPKINS,ASPEN,CO.81611 This Commitment is invalid 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax unless the Insuring 877-217-3158 Toll Free Provisions and Schedules A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: SCHEDULE B-SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Copy of the Registration duly stamped by the Secretary of State of the State of evidencing registration of 605 W BLEEKER, LLC and Statement of Authority and a copy of the Operating Agreement of 605 W BLEEKER, LLC evidencing the names and addresses of the Members and/or Managers authorized to act on behalf of said Limited Liability Company. 2. Duly executed and acknowledged Deed, From : RANDALL A. WHITMAN To :605 W BLEEKER, LLC 3. Deed of Trust from :605 W BLEEKER, LLC to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of :THE LENDER TO BE INSURED HEREUNDER to secure : $2,775,000.00 4. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20(Series of 1979)and Ordinance No. 13(Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. 5. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor(s). (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 6. Completion of Form DR 1083 regarding the withholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property in the State of Colorado. (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 7. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B. 1288 has been complied with. (This instrument is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien,for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens,encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 361 providing as follows:"That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver,cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 8. Terms, conditions, provisions,obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission recorded September 13, 1999 as Reception No.435419 as Resolution No. 33, Series of 1999. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions,obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission recorded September 13, 1999 as Reception No. 435424 as Resolution No. 39, Series of 1999. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission recorded October 7, 1999 as Reception No.436337 as Resolution No. 40, Series of 1999. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Revocable Encroachment License recorded June 5,2000 as Reception No.443896. 12. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded December 15, 1999 in Plat Book 52 at Page 19. 13. Terms, conditions, provisions,obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No. 99-27, Series of 1999 by Aspen City Council recorded October 5, 2000 as Reception No.447704. 14. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Agreement recorded October 5, 2000 as Reception No. 447705. 15. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Encroachment Agreement recorded October 23,2006 as Reception No. 530143. 16. Encroachments of fence lines and concrete driveway as shown on Improvement Survey prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated 04/12 as Job 29116F. ENDORSEMENT SCHEDULE FOR LENDERS POLICY FILE NO: PCT23447W3 BORROWER:605 W SLEEKER, LLC The following endorsements will be issued in connection with the Policy to be issued hereunder as referenced above: Form: $ Form: $ Form: $ Form: $ Form: $ Upon compliance with the requirements set forth below,the following exceptions will be deleted from the final title policy. The fee for deleting exceptions 1 thru 3 is$50.00. The fee for deleting exception 4 is$10.00 for Residential Property and$25.00 for Commercial Property. Exception Number 5 will be deleted upon recordation of the documents called for on the Requirement Page. Exception Number 6 will be amended to read:Taxes for the current year not yet due or payable, upon evidence satisfactory that the Taxes for prior years have been paid in full. NOTE:A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanic's and materialmens liens, executed by the borrower and any additional parties deemed necessary by the Company.The company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event additional facts regarding development,construction or other building or work are disclosed to the company that may fall within any lien period as defined in the Statues of the State of Colorado, and may result in additional premiums and/or fees for such coverage and any additional requirements deemed necessary by the Company. The Company hereby reserves the right to deny any of the above coverage's at its sole discretion. ENDORSEMENT SCHEDULE FOR OWNERS POLICY ATTACHED TO AND BECOMING A PART OF CASE NO: PCT23447W3 SELLER: RANDALL A.WHITMAN BUYER: 605 W BLEEKER, LLC The following endorsements will be issued in connection with the Policy to be issued hereunder as referenced above: ENDORSEMENTS: For a fee of:$ For a fee of: $ For a fee of:$ For a fee of: $ For a fee of: $ Upon compliance with the requirements set forth below,the following exceptions will be deleted from the final policy. The fee for deleting exceptions 1 thru 3 with the issuance of Form 130 is$50.00 The fee for deleting exception 4 is$10.00 for Residential Property and$25.00 for Commercial Property. Exception Number 5 is automatically deleted upon recordation of the documents called for on the requirement page of this commitment. Exception Number 6 will be amended to read:Taxes for the current year not yet due or payable, upon evidence satisfactory that the Taxes for the prior year(s)have been paid. NOTE:A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanic's and materialmens liens,executed by the seller and any additional parties deemed necessary by the Company.The company hereby reserves the right to make additional requirements as may be deemed necessary in the event additional facts regarding development, construction or other building or work are disclosed to the company that may fall within any lien period as defined in the Statues of the State of Colorado, and may result in additional premiums and/or fees for such coverage. NOTE:A current surrey, certified by a Registered Colorado Land Surveyor must be delivered to,approved and retained by the Company for Deletion of Printed Exception No. 3. (NOT REQUIRED FOR CONDOMINIUM OR TOWNHOME UNITS) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1)The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2)Water rights, claims or title to water. (NOTE:THIS EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2 NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective insured in an owner's title insurance policy for a single family residence(including a condominium or townhouse unit)(i)of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy.A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners or loan closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction,the Company will be deemed to have provided"Gap Coverage". Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14(CRS 10-11-122) (a)The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b)A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (c)Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners,the County Clerk and Recorder,or the County Assessor. NOTE:A tax Certificate or other appropriate research will be ordered from the County Treasurer/Assessor by the Company and the costs thereof charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. Pursuant to House Bill 01-1088(CRS 10-11-123) If Schedule B of your commitment for an Owner's Title Policy reflects an exception for mineral interests or leases, pursuant to CRS 10-11-123(HB 01-1088), this is to advise: (a)There is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil,gas,other minerals or geothermal energy in the property and (b)That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owners' permission. NOTE:The policy(s)of insurance may contain a clause permitting arbitration of claims at the request of either the Insured or the Company. Upon request,the Company will provide a copy of this clause and the accompanying arbitration rules prior to the closing of the transaction. NOTICE REGARDING CONSTRUCTION FINANCING: If it is not disclosed to the company that the loan to be insured hereunder is in fact a construction loan,any coverage given under the final policy regarding mechanic or materialmen's liens shall be deemed void and of no effect. *rro"0041T 4 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Guthrie, 970.429.2758 DATE: 11.6.12 PROJECT: 121 N. Fifth Street REPRESENTATIVE: Keith Howie, Poss Architecture and Planning DESCRIPTION: 121 N. Fifth Street is a designated landmark located in the R-6 Zone District. The lot, which is 4,500 square feet in size, was created through a Historic Landmark Lot Split approved by City Council Ordinance #27, Series of 1999. Total floor area for the property is 2,339 square feet. There are no bonuses available to increase that limit. In 2000, an addition was constructed behind the historic building. The applicant would like to remodel/replace the addition. If more than 40% of the existing structure is demolished by the project, affordable housing mitigation will be required for reconstruction. Design review will be according to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Residential Design Standards. The review is a two step process, with a Conceptual application (mass, site plan, etc.) and a Final application (materials, landscape, lighting.) Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): LAM De/ 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures :figs AW 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.415.070.D Major Development �^ 26.415.080 Demolition of designated historic properties 26.415.110 Benefits ICEC 18 2012 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements ;l.t'y OF ASPEN 26.710 R-6 Zone District COMMI)NITY DEVELOPMENT Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/PIanning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ HPC Design Guidelines: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Historic-Preservation/Historic- Properties/ HPC application: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/O/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%2OFees/2011%2OHistoric%2 0 Land%20Use%20App%20 Form.pdf Review by: Staff for completeness, HPC for determination of approval Public Hearing: Yes, at Conceptual and Final. Referral Agencies: None. Planning Fees: $1,890 for 6 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $315 per hour) Referral Agency Fees: None. Total Deposit: $1,890. To apply, please submit: ❑ Signed fee agreement, with payment. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ 10 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. ❑ List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing ❑ Copies of prior approvals. ❑ Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. r rop ORDINANCE No. 27 (SERIES OF 1999) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR AN HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT AT 121 N. FIFTH STREET,LOTS G,H,AND I, BLOCK 24, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN WHEREAS,pursuant to Sections 26.88.030(A)(2) and(5) and 26.72.010(G) of the Municipal Code, an Historic Landmark Lot Split is a subdivision exemption subject to review and approval by City Council after obtaining a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission(hereinafter HPC); and WHEREAS,the applicant, Small and Large Fries, LLC, has requested to split the 9,000 square foot parcel to create two separate single-family residential lots of 4,500 square feet each; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 26.72.010(G) of the Municipal Code, the HPC reviewed the request for the historic lot split at a properly noticed public hearing on June 23, 1999 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS,the Community Development Department has reviewed the application and recommended approval of the Historic Landmark Lot Split, with conditions; and WHEREAS,the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the subdivision exemption under the applicable provisions of Chapters 26.72, 26.88, and 26.100 of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered those recommendations made by the Community Development Department, and the Historic Preservation Commission, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearin ; and WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the Historic Landmark Lot Split, with condit ons,meets or exceeds all applicable development standards of the above refere iced Municipal Code sections; and WHEREAS,the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for th( public health, safety and welfare. NOM , THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Secti, n 1: Pursuant to Sections 26.88.030(A)(2) and (5), Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e), and action 26.72.010(G) of the Municipal Code, and subject to those conditions of approval as specified herein, the City Council finds as follows in regard to the subdivision exemption: 1.. The applicant's submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and evaluation for approval; and 2. The subdivision exemption is consistent with the purposes of subdivision as outlined in Section 26.88.010 of the Municipal Code, which purposes include: assist in the orderly and efficient development of the City; ensure the proper distribution of development; encourage-the well-planned subdivision of land by establishing standards for the design of a subdivision; improve land records and survey monuments by establishing standards for surveys and plats; coordinate the construction of public facilities with the need for public facilities; safeguard the interests of the public and the subdivider and provide consumer protection for the purchaser; and,promote the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen. Section 2: Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1, above, the City Council does hereby grant an Historic Landmark Lot Split subdivision exemption for 121 N. Fifth Street with the following conditions: 1. A subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development and Engineering Departments and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder within one hundred eighty (180) days of final approval by City Council. Failure to record the plat and subdivision exemption agreement within the specified time limit shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. As a minimum,the subdivision plat shall: a. Meet the requirements of Section 26.88.040(D)(1)(a) and (D)(2)(a) of the Aspen Municipal Code; b. Contain a plat note stating that development of Lot B shall be required to mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(c) of the Municipal Code; c. Contain a plat note stating that the lots contained therein shall be prohibited from applying for further subdivision and any development of the lots will comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; d. The two lots created by this lot split shall have a total allowable base FAR, on both lots combined, equal to 4,580 square feet of floor area prior to consideration of potentially applicable lot area reductions (i.e., slopes, access easements, etc.). The applicant shall verify with the City Zoning Officer the total allowable FAR on each lot, taking into account any and all applicable lot area reductions. The property shall be subdivided into two parcels, Lots A and B, each 4,500 square feet in size. Provided it is found by the Zoning Officer that no lot area reductions are required, the maximum allowable FAR on Lot A will be 2,339 s.f. (including a 500 square foot floor area bonus) and 2,241 square feet of floor area on Lot B. The information verified by the City Zoning Officer shall be included on the plat, as a plat note; e. Contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone district, except the variances approved by the HPC. f. That Lots A and B are designated historic landmarks and must receive HPC approval for all development in accordance with Section 26.72 of the Municipal Code, as well at Section 26.5 8,the "Residential Design Standards." 2. As a minimum, the subdivision exemption agreement shall include the elements outlined in Section 26.88.050 of the Aspen Municipal Code, and shall meet the recording and timing requirements described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(e). 3. Encroachments - At the time of redevelopment, the encroachments must be removed from the public right-of-way,relocated, or licensed. 4. Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter - The site is located in the West End where sidewalks are excluded from being built at this time. However the "Pedestrian Walkway and Bikeway System Plan"does indicate that there should be pedestrian usable space off of the street surface. Therefore,the plat needs to indicate a five foot wide pedestrian usable space located 7.5' from the property line and with a five foot buffer for snow storage. Any curb and gutter sections in need of replacement must be replaced prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The applicant needs to sign a sidewalk construction agreement, and pay recording fees, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for new construction. 5. Site Drainage - The existing City storm drainage infrastructure system does not have additional capacity to convey increased storm runoff. The site development approvals must include the requirement of meeting runoff design standards of the Land Use Code at Sec. 26.88.040.C.4.f and a requirement that the building permit application include a drainage mitigation plan (24"06" size plan sheet or on the lot grading plan) and a report signed and stamped by an engineer registered in the State of Colorado, submitted as part of the building and site plan, as well as a temporary sediment control and containment plan for the construction phase. If drywells are an acceptable solution for site drainage, a soils report must be provided with • I percolation test to verify the feasibility of this type system. Drywells may not be placed within utility easements. The foundation drainage system should be separate from storm drainage,must be detained on site, and must be shown on drainage plans prior to permit drawings. These requirements must be met prior to acceptance of a building permit application. 6. Work in the Public Right-of--way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant must receive approval from city engineering (920-5080) for design of improvements, including landscaping, within public rights-of-way, parks department (920-5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance, and streets department(920-5130)for mailboxes , street andalley cuts, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights- of-way from the city community development department. 7. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings with the HPC and City Council shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by HPC or City Council. 8. That the construction of a new single-family dwelling on Lot B created through this Historic Landmark Lot Split pursuant to section 26.88.030(A)(5) shall be exempted by the Community Development Director from residential Growth Management allocations and shall not be deducted from the pool of annual development allotments or from the metro area development ceilings, in accordance with Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e).. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 4: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: A public hearing on the Ordinance was held on the 12th day of July, 1999 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall,Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 28th day of June, 1999. Rachel E. Richards,Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John Worcester, City Attorney FINALLY, adopted,passed and approved this 12th day of July, 1999. Rachel E. Richards, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Orr rp RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT,PARTIAL DEMOLITION, ON-SITE RELOCATION,RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND VARIANCES TO REMODEL A HISTORIC HOUSE AT 121 N. FIFTH STREET, CITY AND.TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO._, SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Small and Large Fries, LLC, represented by Mary Holley, has requested final approval, partial demolition, on-site relocation, residential design review, and variances for the property located at 121 N. Fifth Street, the east % of Lot H and Lot I, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is a designated landmark. The project involves removing non-historic additions to the house, restoration of the original cottage, and construction of a new addition to the rear of the cottage; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, all applications for partial demolition of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district, must meet all of the Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(C) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for-HPC to grant approval, namely: l.Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel; and 2.Standard: The applicant has mitigated,to the greatest extent possible: a.Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions. b.Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions so that they are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, all applications for on-site relocation of any structure included in the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen, or any structure within an "H" Historic Overlay district, must meet all of the following Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.020(D)(2),(3), and (4) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1.Standard: The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure, and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation; and 2.Standard: The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation; and 3.Standard: A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security with the engineering department, as approved by the HPC, to insure the safe relocation, preservation and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation; and WHEREAS, all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.58.040 must meet one of the following statements in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or C) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints, and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated August 25, 1999, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on August 25, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 7 to 0. THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That final approval, partial demolition, on-site relocation, variances, and Residential Design Standards review for 121 N. Fifth Street, the east 1/2 of Lot H and Lot I, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the August 25, 1999 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. The peonies, lilac, and yellow rose bush are typical of Victorian era properties in Aspen and should be retained. They may be transplanted if necessary because the house is being relocated, but they should be replaced around the house in the same manner that they currently exist. (Note that this is an advisory condition.) 2. The location of the front door along W. Bleeker Street will need to be confirmed to the extent possible by framing evidence (once construction begins) and photographs. 3. The design of the front door must be based on a historic example that exists in town, with drawings to be approved by staff and monitor. 4. All existing historic windows in the house must be retained. Where the historic windows have previously been removed, new replacement windows must match what existed originally, as shown in the drawings. 5. The HPC has granted the following variances: a 7' combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 2.3' west sideyard setback variance, a 3' west sideyard setback variance for lightwells, a l' east sideyard setback variance, and a 3.3' combined sideyard setback variance, finding that the variances are needed to place the bulk of the new construction as far back from the historic house as possible, and to accommodate the width of the existing structure, and are compatible with the historic landmark and the neighborhood. 6. HPC must discuss the new foundation treatment, which is proposed to be clapboards and copper flashing. 7. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures when selected. 8. New flues may be added in the location shown on the approved drawings. The flues shall be metal pipe, detailed in the manner typical of miner's cottages and approved by staff and monitor. A masonry, clapboard, or metal sided stack is not approved. 9. Provide a relocation plan, detailing how the house will be securely stored during relocation (windows covered with plywood, fencing around the building), and a letter of credit in the amount of$30,000 with submittal for building permit. 10. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 11. Submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage. 12. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 13. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 14. The preservation plan described above, as well as the language of conditions 1-5, 7-9, 13 and 14 will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 15. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 16. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 25th day of August, 1999. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk poss , 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 RECEIVED MEMORANDUM DEC 1 8 701r TO: Amy Guthrie City of Aspen HPC Chairwoman CITY OF/ 614—N CC: File COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN z. FROM: Keith Howie Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. DATE: December 11, 2011 RE: Roth Remodel HPC Application ❑ ENCLOSURE 121 North 5th Street Aspen, Colorado, 81611 1. Project Location The project is located at the corner of fifth and West Bleeker Streets in the West end of Aspen. This development sits on a corner lot at the juncture of 5th and West Bleeker. Because of this condition, this development is listed in the City of Aspen Building Department as 605 West Bleeker. 2.Legal Address The legal address of the property is Lot A, Small and Large Fries Subdivision, according to the Plat recorded December i5th,sggg, in plat book 52 at page i9 3.Project History The original Miners cottage was assumed to be constructed between i88o - igoo. It is believed that the owner in the 3.95o's added a single gable "miners cottage"to the to the original T shaped cottage. These two building elements compose the current historically designated house. An HPC approved addition and renovation was performed in 3.999 to the property. This renovation added a one story connector volume and two story volume at the south end of the property.The addition connected into the back of the original historic house. A lower level was added under the original house and new addition.The original house is currently a Historically Designated landmark. 4. Neighborhood Context The neighborhood context consists of single family residences. These houses consist of both new and remodeled older houses, some historic and some not. The project site is one block off Main Street, so that there are some larger lodge structures in close proximity to the site.The neighborhood has mature landscaping,consisting of mature cottonwood,Aspen, Spruce,and Pine trees. 4. New Development This project involves restoration of the original cottage, addition of a historically appropriate front porch, removing and re-building the z story 1999 addition and a 3.999 connecting element in the back of the original house,and renovation of the interior of the historic house and new addition. poss a 5. New Development Description In the new development we are changing the roof lines and volumes of the back addition of iggg. Even though we understand the intent of the 1.ggg addition (ie. house and carriage house concept), it is our opinion that the similar volumes of the 1.999 addition cloud the perception between what is original and what is the addition. In a true "house and carriage house" scenario, the main house would be larger than the carriage house and usually more ornate, not as currently existing with the carriage house larger than the main house. It is believed that the current original house in our project was a prototypical "Miners Cottage"with and L shape plan. These houses were utilitarian in purpose and usually self contained structures on a small lot. In our project the original cottage was combined with a "Gable End'cottage. The new design takes a different approach to adding a similar type volume onto the existing structure. In this design we are separating the new addition from the original house in both form and materials. Since the original typology of the "Miners cottage" was stand alone building, we are returning to this intention. We feel the proposed development is compatible in massing, volume, with the historic structure located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels. The proposed development reinforces the historic significance of original historic structure by clearly defining what is historic and what is new and does not diminish the architectural character or integrity of the historic structure. We are proposing these design ideas for the new addition to reinforce this idea. a.Glass Gasket This glass gasket appears on two sides of the house at the end of the original house walls.The gasket is an eighteen inch window and skylight that separates the original house from the new addition. This gasket shows the exact footprint of the original house and gives it prominence. b. Flat roof Connector We have replaced the low sloped pitches roof with a flat roof where the new addition meets the original house.We feel that making this element a different form further shows the difference between old and new. c.Screened Volume We have replaced the gable volume with a flat volume and are proposing a slatted wood screen to clad the volume. By using a matte finish material (natural Ipe wood that weathers to a silver grey color)for the wood screen, we are attempting to have the addition recede to give prominence to the original house. The new addition will be one foot shorter than the current gable form massing. As mentioned earlier in this application, we feel that changing the look of the addition from the original house magnifies the difference between old and new and gives the old house more prominence.This concept has been used on many projects nationally and internationally with success.We feel that this concept is appropriate for this project. d.Addition of porch to Historic House We are not sure if this house had a porch,or if it was taken off and never replaced, but when you look at examples of similar houses from this era, all have porches. We feel that the house would look more historically correct with a porch. poss HPC Design Guidelines Chapter 1 Streetscape and Lot Features 1.1 Preserve original fences Existing: There currently does not exist any original fencing on the project. Proposed : See sections 1.2 and 1.3 1.2 Replacement Fences Existing: There currently exists a thirty inch high white picket fence along the front and fifth street side of the property and a six foot tall white picket fence that encloses a hot tub on the alley(south)side of the property. Proposed: We are proposing to remove the six foot tall white picket fence on the south side of the property and to replace the smaller thirty inch fence with an open weave steel or cast iron. We feel that the iron fence would be more consistent with the original house and will allow views into the yard. We will look at straightening the fence line along 5th street. 1.3 Transparent Fencing See section 1.2 above 1.4 New Fence Components See section 1.2 above 1.5 Side Yard Fences Existing: There currently exists a side yard fence between our project site and the house next door (6og West Bleeker)that was constructed by the property owner on 6og West Bleeker. Proposed: This fence will remain as it is on the property of 6og West Bleeker. 1.6 Replacement of Side yard Fencing See section 1.5 above Retaining walls 1.7 Preserve original retaining walls 1.8 Maintain Historic height This section does not apply as there are no retaining walls Walkways 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public to private spaces. Existing: There currently exists a curving walkway up to the original house(please refer to survey) Proposed: The existing walkway will be replaced with a walkway that will go between the current trees. This new path will be stone, species to be determined. Please refer to the new site plan. Private Yard 1.10 Preserve Historic Elements of the yard. Existing: The is sparse low groundcover(not sod) under the tree canopy in the current front yard There is sod and planted flower beds outside the current front fencing. Proposed: In the front yard it is desired to plant sod, but because of the dense coniferous tree canopy above, only acid (from the pine needles) resistant plants will survive. We are consulting with a landscape architect and will submit a landscape plan at final review for this area. pass 1.11 Preservation of mature landscaping. Existing: There are numerous mature Pine and Aspen trees on the site. Proposed: It is the intent to keep all the mature trees Aspen trees on and shrubs currently on site. We are consulting with an arborist for the possible removal of i to 3 pine trees on the front northeast corner of the sit. Currently, these trees are in very close proximity to each other and there is some dead fall and evidence of some disease on some trees.We will forward the arborists report to the HPC upon receipt for evaluation. 1.12 - Maintain Historic planting designs Existing: There is currently no historic planting design. Proposed: A new landscape plan taking into account historical precedents will be submitted at the final HPC review. 1.13 Revisions should be consistent with Historic context See section 1.12 above 1.14 Additions to the landscape interfering with Historic elements Existing: There are numerous mature Pine and Aspen trees on the site Proposed: No landscape elements that would obscure the original historic house will be planted.A landscape plan will be submitted during the final HPC review. Site Lighting 1.15 Minimize the effects of site lighting Existing: The only lighting is surface mounted lighting on the existing structure at code mandated locations Proposed: The only lighting will be on the structure and will conform to the City of Aspen lighting code.A lighting plan will be submitted at final HPC review. Streetscape 1.16 Preserve historically significant landscape designs and features Existing:: There are numerous mature pine and Aspen trees on the site, but none would be deemed Historically significant. There are no historically significant landscape designs on the existing site. Proposed: Please see section 1..3.1 and 1.12 1.17 Maintain historic irrigation ditches Existing: There currently exists a small irrigation ditch on the east side of the property on 5th street. This ditch is in the City of Aspen right-of-way. Proposed: The ditch is not on the owner's property,so the ditch will remain in current location. Chapter 10- Building Additions Existing Additions 10.1 Preserve and older addition that has achieved historic significance in its own right Existing: There is no older addition to preserve. The 1999 addition is not historically significant. Proposed: A new addition is proposed to the rear of the original historic house. See description above. POSS # 4 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed Existing: There is a non-historic HPC approved addition from 1999. Proposed: The iggg addition will be removed. We will re-use the foundations from this addition and replaced with a new addition. New Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: The new addition is not consistent with the historic house on purpose. The change in materials and forms we think more clearly demonstrate what is historic and what is new rather than mimicking the original house. We are not implying a larger inaccurate version of the original house's historic style. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: The 1.999 addition will be removed. The new addition is designed to be a product of its own time.The new addition clearly demonstrates what is historic and what is new rather than mimicking the original house. 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999• Proposed: The new addition will use the current alignment of the 3.999 addition. This alignment is on the grid of the original house and City of Aspen grid pattern. 1o.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: The new addition is consistent with the size of the existing HPC approved 3.999 addition and lower in height by one foot.We have attempted to make the new addition as small as possible and have added a wood screening device to attempt to make the addition recede when compared to the original house. 10.7 if it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than the historic building, set it back substantially from the significant facades and use a "connector"to link the it to the historic building. Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999• Proposed: In the 1gg addition there exists a low pitched roof connecting element that is set back from the original house.We are changing the "connector"roof form to a flat roof. We feel that changing this roof form distinguishes the original house more from the new addition.We will keep the current wall arrangement that sets back the connector from the original house We are adding a glass "gasket" on both sides of the original house to further separate the original house from the new addition. Please refer to the perspective model pictures. pOSS 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. . Proposed: The new addition follows the existing HPC approved lggg addition footprint, stepping back from the original walls. It is located at the rear of the property and is set back as much as possible from the original house. The original house will be painted an off white color with a dark color in the gable ends. The new addition will have a dark painted connector and an Ipe wood screen that will weather to a silver grey color. We are using these colors and materials to make the new addition recede in prominence- when compared to the original house. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Existing: There are gable roofs on the original house. Proposed: The new addition has flat roofs. These roofs are different from the original house on purpose.The change in materials and forms we think more clearly demonstrates what is historic and what is new rather than mimicking the original house in a larger scale. 10.10 Design and addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999. Proposed: The position and materials of the original historic house will not be disturbed. A new historically accurate front porch is proposed for the front of the original house. A new wood shingle roof is proposed for the original house to replace the current roof which is at the end of its lifespan 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. Existing: There is a non-historic HPC approved addition from 1999 with similar siding treatments. Proposed: The new addition has materials that do not mimic the historic house, but we feel are complementary to differentiate the original house from the new addition. Rooftop Additions 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition,keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building Existing: There is no rooftop deck on current addition. Proposed: There will be a rooftop deck that does not overhang the lower floors of the project.This deck is tucked in behind the roof forms of the original house.The only part of this deck that is visible from the street is the glass railing separating the historic house from the new addition. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. Existing: There is a non-historic addition from 1999• Proposed: There are no dormers or roof additions proposed to the original historic house. POSS 10.14 The roof form and slope of the new addition should be in character with the historic building Existing: There is a non-historic addition from zggg. Proposed: The roof form of the new addition is not consistent with the historic house on purpose. The change in materials and forms we think more clearly demonstrate what is historic and what is new rather than mimicking the original house with a larger copy at the rear of the property. Summation We realize that this is not a typical HPC solution to the problem of adding an addition to a historical property. Even though it is not typical,we feel that this proposed development is compatible in massing, volume, with the historic structure located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels. The proposed development reinforces the historic significance of original historic structure by clearly defining what is historic and what is new and does not diminish the architectural character or integrity of the historic structure.We ask that HPC grant conceptual approval of this project. Respectfully Submitted, Keith Howie, Poss Architecture+ Planning Authorized representative for 6o5 West Bleeker, LLC. A S �. r �` ��'ti�u997 @r SI .JZ j r. � 9 ` �.,,, � •, v Y G .� .�" �w+Srt7t/^ wt4 5 CfOSSf©Qd3� i,, :t-, SQQ -,tip "'4ejJ ',rR •' ,.��i �, ' d�'. Aspeen Vdct�ClOn , «„ "..t•�.- 'w/j > � r' Wi,�cr4.... '.•1 . � - i f2entals r yF�^�`�..°. _ ryC�w'c'l � _ �ra� � w, ,r „y :.1jy� 1 - 1 ti ,`I'IdllyfiJJt. D,,pi �'. '` �� r !Z 11T•�F t., ,r 7 4F� ` CilwTu on w Franrislst z ,y A • VV41alf, s tot P* •.'q �ry � _�, uitY 1� 1 �WH'1f711 MPS, , .1•:R •.Y„1.:� - , kLr �. 1' i" i..�', d"L.. "f.:.' .-,�a.• ,; ^-� y,:.yf� r'f Ana�u i '.+_ .^ r'�y. "�r� �e._�• SOD '"'�.' `�'� �._-. y.- :'�'• 1t �'t, y Menendez ! AfCl1112CC3;PCI rj' �d .;,y � �p9i���F01k� s �� •... `f o 8T of Aspen I � Eye Ctriic L , �� �!Y ¢�ins Y�I E,�tn1e Wx�;�a/��E, ,�►��.�`':. ��, r . 'y23n�� �• �^ ./ , A r a � AmaheUe Inn•k.� "- �I W �rs^'`' H�.• r W 40 �~� r+ Li -? .Spa .., IWI X.. a