Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.114 Neal Ave.0014.2013.AHPC 40 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0014.2013.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 07 3 83 002 PROJECTS ADDRESS 114 NEALE AVE PLANNER JUSTIN BARKER CASE DESCRIPTION MAJOR HPC DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVE STEEV WILSON DATE OF FINAL ACTION 5.28.13 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 11/18/13 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: {� Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: V Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. S Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 1 0 day of n , 20L , by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE My commission expires: Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site sPacific development plan,and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to Notary Public the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24,Article 68,Colorado Revised Statutes,pertain- ing to the following described property.114 Neale Avenue,Lot 1,114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split,City and Townsite of Aspen,CO,Parcel ID #2737-073-83-001,by order of the Community De- velopment Director on May 27,2013. The appli- cant,DWS Family Trust,obtained approval fora ATTACHMENTS: site specific development that includes replace- ment of anon-historic addition at the back of the COPY OF THE PUBLICATION existing Victorian house with new construction through HPC Resolution#19,Series of 2013. For further information contact Justin Barker,at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept.130 S. Galena St,Aspen,Colorado(970)429-2797. City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on June 6, 2013. [9239288] DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. DWS Family Trust 3 Remington Lane Houston TX 77005 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address 114 Neale Avenue, Lot 1, 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Parcel ID#2737-073-83-001 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant received Final Major Development approval to replace a non-historic addition at the back of the existing Victorian house with new construction. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan HPC granted approval with conditions via Resolution 419, Series of 2013 on May 22, 2013. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates(Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) June 6 2013 Effective Date of Development Order(Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) June 6 2016 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 27t" ay of May, 2013, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. h ; Chris Bendon, Community Development Director wlECEPTION#: 599861, 05/29/2013 at 09:31:07 AM, 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 114 NEALE AVENUE, LOT 1, 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION #19, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-83-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, DWS Family Trust, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, requested HPC Conceptual Major Development and Variance approval for the property located at 114 Neale Avenue, Lot 1, 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Subdivision; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Justin Barker, in his staff report to HPC dated May 22, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 22, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 6 to 0. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Final Major Development approval for the property located at 114 Neale Avenue with the following conditions: 1. HPC granted a front yard variance of 6 feet for the subgrade space at Conceptual Review. 2. HPC granted a 400 square foot floor area bonus at Conceptual Review. 3. HPC recommends the applicant consult with engineering to develop an appropriate alternative to the proposed sidewalk along King Street. The alternative should address concerns with safety for bikers and pedestrians turning onto King Street, while staying in character with the neighborhood, which has not traditionally had sidewalks. 4. The height of the east fence forward of the front fagade shall be 42 inches or lower. 5. The driveway gate shall be 42 inches or lower. 114 Neale Ave. HPC Resolution #19, Series of 2013 Page 1 of 3 r 6. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 114 Neale Avenue, Lot 1, 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. 114 Neale Ave. HPC Resolution #19, Series of 2013 Page 2 of 3 APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 22nd day of May, 2013. J4 Mactin,Ac ing Chair Appnas t, For Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST; athy Strict and, Chief Deputy Clerk 114 Neale Ave. HPC Resolution #19, Series of 2013 Page 3 of 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 22, 2013 MOTION: Jay moved to approve resolution #18 second by Nora. All in favor, motion carried. 114 Neale Ave. — Final Major Development— Public Hearing Steev Wilson—Forum Phi architecture Debbie said the affidavit of posting is in order and the applicant can proceed. Justin said this is part of an historic lot split done in 1998. The house was moved up the hill and it is an historic miners cottage and has a non-historic contemporary addition added on right now. At conceptual HPC approved to remodel and expand that rear addition and to add a garage and a subgrade living space. HPC also approved a front yard setback as well as a 400 square foot bonus. As far as the landscape the west side isn't changing except for a small picket fence in the front and a stone paver walkway that goes around the house to the back. On the east side a driveway is being added. The city forester has no issues with the removal of the trees for the driveway. A sidewalk is proposed along the north but staff recommends not putting in a sidewalk or proposing something more subdued. This area is not part of the city sidewalk master plan. The new fence along the east will be 6 feet tall. On the street facing side the residential design guidelines only allow it to be 42 inches high so they will have to drop the height. That issue also exists on the front. Possibly the IPE fence could be moved back so it isn't flush with the house. Staff recommends approval with conditions to carry over the FAR bonus from conceptual as well as removing the proposed sidewalk or replacing it and to be reviewed by staff and monitor. Lower the height of the east fence and locate the driveway gate completely behind the front fagade. Steev said we can comply with the 42 inches on the fence. A window was changed to a door on the back and we added some windows in the bedroom to get some light. The white picket fence is our addition. The driveway will be pervious. We are using an IPE wood screen fence and a standing seam metal roof. Sallie said when you turn right on King Street you always end up in the middle of the street and it gets dangerous. 9 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 22, 2013 Justin said they could use something such'as crushed gravel that would identify the pathway. Steev said maybe we can use the same pervious system as the driveway and work with the monitor. Patrick also recommended that something occur on King Street for a sidewalk and that the fence be lowered to 42 inches. Steev said there will be lights under the steps going out on the deck. The front entry will have a sconce and there will be sconces on the garage. Coming down the driveway there will be a series of linear elements, LED lights that will illuminate the driveway. Commissioner, Jay Maytin opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public comment section of the agenda item was closed. Jay identified the issues: Fence height Gate height and location Sidewalk on King St. Picket fence around the historic resource Nora and Sallie said all the issues have been addressed. Sallie said we should give direction about the sidewalk. Willis said the applicant has lowered the fences where indicated to 42 inches. Jay commended the applicant on a great project. The sidewalk along King Street can be reviewed by staff and monitor. MOTION: Jay moved to approve resolution #19 with a change to condition #3 that the sidewalk be reviewed by staff and monitor. The sidewalk should stay one way or another. Keep #4. Strike #5. #6 on the gate the height should be 42 inches or lower. Motion second by Willis. All in favor, motion carried. 10 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 22, 2013 WORK SESSION Selection of HPC 2012 awards MOTION: Jay moved to adjourn; second by Patrick. All in favor, motion carried. Meetin adjourned at 7:00 m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 11 D40. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Justin Barker, Planner THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 114 Neale Avenue-Final Major Development and Variances, Public Hearing DATE: May 22, 2013 SUMMARY: 114 Neale Avenue is a ��° �s landmark designated 6,001 square footQ lot that contains a historic Victorian f miner's cottage and a non-historic n .' contemporary rear addition. The property was created as a result of a Historic Landmark Lot Split in 1998. The applicant has received HPC ` Conceptual approval to remodel and expand the rear addition, adding a garage and a subgrade living space. Final approval is needed. E, Staff recommends approval with conditions. APPLICANT: DWS Family Trust, 3 Remington Lane, Houston TX 77005, represented by Forum Phi Architecture. ADDRESS: 114 Neale Ave, Lot 1, 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Subdivision. PARCEL ID: 2737-07-3-83-001. ZONING: R-15A (Moderate Density Residential). MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Final level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of 1 Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structures) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Final review focuses on landscape plan, lighting, fenestration, and selection of new materials. A list of the relevant design guidelines is attached as "Exhibit A." Overall, staff is in support of the project. The proposal further clarifies and distinguishes the historic building and is compliant with the applicable guidelines. Landscape The front landscape will mostly not change from the existing. The only additions include a new wood picket fence and stone paver path leading around the house. The largest change proposed is the addition of a driveway on the east and south sides of the property to allow access to the garage. The Engineering Department strongly prefers driveway access come from King Street instead of Neale Avenue. Several trees along the east and south property lines are proposed for removal to allow the driveway behind the house. The City Forester has reviewed the proposal and has no issues with the removals. The existing pond will also be removed to allow the expansion and driveway. The existing ditch on the north of the property will be retained. The applicant has proposed to continue the sidewalk on Neale Avenue around the property along King Street. According to the guidelines: 1.16 Preserve historically significant landscape designs and features. ❑ This includes the arrangement of trees, shrubs,plant beds, irrigation ditches and sidewalks in the public right-of- way. There is currently no sidewalk along the south side of King Street, and it is not recommended on the City's sidewalk master plan. Staff recommends either removing the proposed sidewalk, or using a pathway with steppers or crusher fines that would be more appropriate and in context with the character of the street. A new fence is proposed along the east property line, while the fence on the south property line will remain. The short section of fence currently along the west property line will be removed. Staff commends the minimal change proposed on the west side of the property. The proposed driveway gate and a portion of the east property fence are forward of the front most street-facing fagade of the house. According to the Residential Design Standards: 2 26.410.040.A.3.Fences. Fences, hedgerows and planter boxes shall not be more than forty-two (42) inches high, measured from natural grade, in all areas forward of the front facade of the house. The portion of the east property fence forward of the front facade needs to be lowered to 42 inches. For the driveway gate, staff suggests locating it fully behind the facade so the height will not have to be altered. Lighting The applicant has proposed minimal lighting, mostly located along the vehicular and pedestrian paths for safety and egress. No new lighting is proposed on the historic resource. Staff finds the proposed lighting to be acceptable and consistent with the relevant guidelines. Fenestration There are no proposed changes to the existing fenestration on the historic structure. The applicant has clearly stated several times in the application that any work done on the existing historic structure will only be repair as necessary. Materials The applicant has proposed to use primarily a wood ipe screen for the ground floor additions and board form concrete for the partial subgrade area and garage. The new roofs are proposed as standing seam metal. The gateway for the driveway is proposed as the same wood ipe material as the addition. This causes the mass of the north addition to appear larger. Staff recommends using a different material for the gateway. The new driveway is proposed as pervious pavers. The applicant will provide samples of all new materials at the meeting. More of the historic house will be revealed with the new proposal. The applicant proposes to use new clapboard siding and roof shingles that will match what is existing on the historic house. The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant Final Major Development approval with the following conditions: 1. HPC granted a front yard variance of 6 feet for the subgrade space at Conceptual Review. 2. HPC granted a 400 square foot floor area bonus at Conceptual Review. 3. Remove the proposed sidewalk along King Street or replace with more appropriate material, for review and approval by staff and monitor. 4. Lower the height of the east fence forward of the front facade to 42 inches. 5. Locate the driveway gate completely behind the front facade. 3 6. The material for the driveway gate shall be different than the addition, for review and approval by staff and monitor. 7. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3)years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 114 Neale Ave, Lot 1, 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the-Aspen Home Rule Charter. Exhibits: A. Relevant Guidelines B. Application 4 Exhibit A Fences 1.1 Preserve original fences. ❑ Replace only those portions that are deteriorated beyond repair. Replacement elements should match the existing fence. 1.2 A new replacement fence should use materials that appear similar to that of the original. ❑ Any fence which is visible from a public right-of-way must be built of wood or wrought iron. Wire fences also may be considered. ❑ A wood picket fence is an appropriate replacement in most locations. A simple wire or metal fence, similar to traditional "wrought iron,"also may be considered. ❑ Chain link is prohibited and solid "stockade" fences are only allowed in side and rear yards. 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a "transparent" quality allowing views into the yard- from the street. ❑ A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and"transparent" in nature. ❑ On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information,see the City of Aspen's "Residential Design Standards".) ❑ A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. ❑ Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. ❑ Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. ❑ Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.5 A side yard fence which extends between two homes should be set back from the street-facing facade. ❑ This setback should be significant enough to provide a sense of open space between homes. 1.6 Replacement or new fencing between side yards and along the alley should be compatible with the historic context. ❑ A side yard fence is usually taller than its front yard counterpart. It also is less transparent. A side yard fence may reach heights taller than front yard fences (up to six feet), but should incorporate transparent elements to minimize the possible visual impacts. ❑ Consider staggering the fence boards on either side of the fence rail. This will give the appearance of a solid plank fence when seen head on. ❑ Also consider using lattice,or other transparent detailing,on the upper portions of the fence. Walkways 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. ❑ This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi- public"walkway,to a"semi-private"porch or entry feature and ending in the"private" spaces beyond. ❑ Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged,except where it is needed to avoid a tree. ❑ Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. Private Yard 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. ❑ The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site,particularly landmark trees and shrubs. ❑ Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. ❑ If a tree must be removed as part of the addition or alteration,replace it with species of a large enough scale to have a visual impact in the early years of the project. 1.12 Preserve and maintain historically significant planting designs. ❑ Retaining historic planting beds, landscape features and walkways is encouraged. 5 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. ❑ Select plant and tree material according to its mature size,to allow for the long-term impact of mature growth. ❑ Reserve the use of exotic plants to small areas for accent. ❑ Do not cover grassy areas with gravel,rock or paving materials. Streetscape 1.16 Preserve historically significant landscape designs and features. ❑ This includes the arrangement of trees, shrubs,plant beds, irrigation ditches and sidewalks in the public right-of- way. 1.17 Maintain historic irrigation ditches as an integral component of the streetscape. The character of an irrigation ditch should be maintained. ❑ It is inappropriate to use an irrigation ditch as a planting bed,or to fill it with another material. ❑ Ditches cannot by culverted except where crossed by a walkway or driveway,and a culvert must be approved by the Parks Department. Treatment of Materials 2.1 Preserve original building materials. ❑ Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. ❑ Only remove siding which is deteriorated and must be replaced. ❑ Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations,should be preserved. ❑ Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. 2.2 Protect wood features from deterioration. ❑ Provide proper drainage and ventilation to minimize rot. ❑ Maintain protective coatings to retard drying and ultraviolet damage. 2.3 Plan repainting carefully. ❑ Always prepare a good substrate. Prior to painting, remove damaged or deteriorated paint only to the next intact layer,using the gentlest means possible. ❑ Use compatible paints. Some latex paints will not bond well to earlier oil-based paints without a primer coat. Replacement Materials 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. ❑ If the original material is wood clapboard, for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size,the amount of exposed lap and finish. ❑ Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced,not the entire wall. 2.8 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for primary building materials. ❑ In some instances, substitute materials may be used for replacing architectural details, but doing so is not encouraged. if it is necessary to use a new material, such as a fiberglass column, the style and detail should precisely match that of the historic model. ❑ Primary building materials such as wood siding and brick should not be replaced with synthetic materials. ❑ Synthetic materials include: aluminum, vinyl siding and panelized brick. ❑ EIFS(synthetic stucco)is not an appropriate replacement for real stucco. New Additions 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building,while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. ❑ The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 6 Color 14.3 Keep color schemes simple. ❑ Using one base color for the building is preferred. ❑ Using only one or two accent colors is also encouraged, except where precedent exists for using more than two colors with some architectural styles. 14.4 Coordinating the entire building in one color scheme is usually more successful than working with a variety of palettes. ❑ Using the color scheme to establish a sense of overall composition for the building is strongly encouraged. 14.5 Develop a color scheme for the entire building front that coordinates all the facade elements. ❑ Choose a base color that will link the entire building face together. For a commercial building, it can tie signs, ornamentation, awnings and entrances together. On residences, it can function similarly. It can also help your building relate better to others in the district. ❑ The complexity of the accent colors should be appropriate to the architectural style of the building. ❑ Doors may be painted a bright accent color, or they may be left a natural wood finish. Historically, many of the doors would have simply had a stain applied. ❑ Window sashes are also an excellent opportunity for accent color. ❑ Brilliant luminescent or"day-glo"colors are not appropriate. Lighting 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. ❑ The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. ❑ All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. ❑ Unshielded,high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. ❑ Shield lighting associated with service areas,parking lots and parking structures. ❑ Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. ❑ Do not wash an entire building facade in light. ❑ Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations,such as on the upper walls of buildings. ❑ Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. ❑ Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. ❑ Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. Driveways&Parking 14.17 Design a new driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. ❑ Plan parking areas and driveways in a manner that utilizes existing curb cuts.New curb cuts are not permitted. ❑ If an alley exists,anew driveway must be located off of it. 14.18 Garages should not dominate the street scene. See Chapter 8:Secondary Structures. 14.19 Use a paving material that will distinguish the driveway from the street. ❑ Using a change in material,paving pattern or texture will help to differentiate the driveway from the street. ❑ Porous paving materials will also help to absorb potential water runoff typically associated with impervious surfaces such as asphalt or concrete. 14.20 Off-street driveways should be removed,if feasible. ❑ Non-historic parking areas accessed from the street should be removed if parking can be placed on the alley. 14.21 For existing driveways that cannot be removed, provide tracks to a parking area rather than paving an entire driveway. ❑ Using minimally paved tracks will reduce the driveway's visual impact. ❑ Consider using a porous paving material to reduce the driveways visual impact. ❑ Also consider using modular paving materials for these tracks to provide visual interest along the street. 7 14.22 Driveways leading to parking areas should be located to the side or rear of a primary structure. ❑ Locating drives away from the primary facade will maintain the visual importance the structure has along a block. See Chapter 8:Secondary Structures. 14.23 Parking areas should not be visually obtrusive. ❑ Large parking areas should be screened from view from the street. ❑ Divide large parking lots with planting areas. (Large parking areas are those with more than five cars.) ❑ Consider using a fence,hedge or other appropriate landscape feature. ❑ Automobile headlight illumination from parking areas should be screened from adjacent lots and the street. 14.24 Large parking areas, especially those for commercial and multifamily uses, should not be visually obtrusive. ❑ Locate parking areas to the rear of the property,when physical conditions permit. ❑ An alley should serve as the primary access to parking,when physical conditions permit. ❑ Parking should not be located in the front yard,except in the driveway, if it exists. 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 114 NEALE AVENUE, LOT 1, 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION #_, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-83-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, DWS Family Trust, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, requested HPC Conceptual Major Development and Variance approval for the property located at 114 Neale Avenue, Lot 1, 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Subdivision; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Justin Barker, in his staff report to HPC dated May 22, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 22, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of_to_. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants Final Major Development approval for the property located at 114 Neale Avenue with the following conditions: 1. HPC granted a front yard variance of 6 feet for the subgrade space at Conceptual Review. 2. HPC granted a 400 square foot floor area bonus at Conceptual Review. 3. Remove the proposed sidewalk along King Street or replace with more appropriate material, for review and approval by staff and monitor. 4. Lower the height of the east fence forward of the front fagade to 42 inches. 5. Locate the driveway gate completely behind the front fagade. 6. The material for the driveway gate shall be different than the addition, for review and approval by staff and monitor. 114 Neale Ave. HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2013 Page 1 of 3 7. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 114 Neale Avenue, Lot 1, 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. 114 Neale Ave. HPC Resolution #_, Series of 2013 Page 2 of 3 APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 22nd day of May, 2013. Jamie Brewster McLeod, Acting Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 114 Neale Ave. HPC Resolution #_, Series of 2013 Page 3 of 3 JC-04 vl EXHIBIT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CO ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: it ± ts f e4LL � , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: p M h-C 5.46enr 2 , 2013 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: j I y Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the—day of , 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property o,,Nners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other - sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However,the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this day of M��,y , 20/3, by 7 j'RE: 114 NEALE AVEN A MAJOR DEVELOPMENT WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY EN that a public hearing �� will be held on Wednesday, meeting to begin at 5:00 P.m.May 22,2013,at a Historic Preservation C missioone nhCounc 1 My commission expires: 3---2 7�1� H will Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen. DWS Family Trust 3 RemPn�gton Lane,Houston? r• TX, w Neale 77005,related to their property located at 114 C ID 737 City Md Townsite of Aspen,Co Parcel cel L7 nal desi�Da9-63-001. The applicant requests Fi. otary Public 9 pproval. The,roposaI ncludas re- placing anon-historic atldition at the back of the 03Q9/2014 existing Victorian house with new construction. For further information,contact Justin Barker at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S.Galena SL,Aspen,CO,ent)q29-2797 justin.barkers ciryofaspen.com s/Ann Mullins Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published 227h Aspen Times Weekly on May 2, ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 11.4 WEALc Memue , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 22. Met4 , 20 17�) STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, S'VEEV WILSON (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. __y Pasting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the '-A- day of MAQ , 20 k3, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A p otograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of' notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy gf any documentation that iva.s presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this "Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The fore roing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this _/7 day of 12013 , by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL YODDALAY My commis` n expires: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF 999D4002103 NOTARY IRES 3ANUARY 25.2015 Notary Public MY COMMISSION ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: •COPY OF THE PUBLICATION •PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 Easy Peel£° t beis A ommum bend a jori g hne,to f� Use Av€�r y`s� Ierr pwp s1EC1' �Od PMAr �;va .w Pop up Et19c," 51Ca£1' BE:ATON GLENN K BLEEKER STREE E REV 6RU t BRIE=*N AL.ICE-: 936 KING ST 32 TUi_IF'ST 110 NEALE AVE ASPEN, CO 81€I l SUMMI"`, NJ 07901 ASPEN, CO I31611 CITY OF ASPEN A1 EN FINANCE DEPT DECRAY MARCELLA TRUST 50% FRONTIER LLC 130 S GALENA ST 1528 HILE. ST 11144 MOCKINGBIRD DR ASPEN,CO 81611 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 OMAHA, NE: 68137 Ft-ENTE DAVID& SHEILA GIRVIN LINDA A GREENWOOD WILLIAM S 7£71 TEEN POINT CIR 4,14 N MILE_ST PO BOX 477£3 B£.CA RATON, Ff, 373131 ASPE=N, CO e1611 ASPE=N, GO 81I>12 HATANAKA HOWARD I ISAAC:;Tf iOMAS D REV T'RST KASABACE 1 JACQUELYN A 980 KING ST 975 KING ST PG BOX 4'166 ASPEN,CC £31611 ASPEN, GO, 81611 ASPE=N, CO 81612 LANG DONAi D W LAWRENCE LARRY S QPR TREJST SWl 4, LIPSEY WILLIAM S PO BOX 4166 8561 RUETTB MONTE CARLO 955 KING SI ASPEN, CC 51512 1 JOLLA,CA 920,27 ASPEN CO 81611 LOEWFN STERN CAROL TRUST MAPLE CHARLES A&BRYCE M MARZIALE ANTONIO 910 GIBSON AVE 927 GIBSON AVE 152011 MASON RD#16079 PMB 375 ASPEN, CO 31611 ASPE=N,CO 8161 1, CYPREE. TX 77433 MEADOWS JEAN R&S I`ANLE Y H MICKEY JAMES&MARL.ENE MORRIS JAMESIBYARD ANNE= TRUST 538 HILLSIDE DR 931 GIBSON AVE 8501 GIBSON AVE HI£.;HLAND PARK. IL 607035 ASPEN,CO 61611 ASPEN,CO 81611 MORSE JAMES A TRUST PARRY SUSAN LYNN RIVER HOUSE LLC 800 E E"L LIS RD PO BOX 2529 28 W GRAND AVE NORTON SHORES; MI 49,14.1-5622 ASPEN,£°CJ 81612 MON I VALE, NJ 07645 ROCKY M T N PROPERTY II LLC; SHOAF JEFFREY S SKOKOS THEODORE C&SHANNON B 73 SMUGGLER LER GROVE RD PG BOX 3123 PO BOX 17330 30 ASPEN, CO 131611 ASPEN, CO 8 16 12 LITTLE ROCK,AR "12222 SNL'11V ORC C'i-IID I._LC VARE DARLE NE" DESEDLEv TRUST WEISMAN FAMILY LP 1125 SAN MA"EEO DR 1024 1{-iTH S E #7 � P�1FNI_C}PARK, CA L14925 � �, 90403 IRViNG AVE; SOUTH SANTA'MONICA, ,CA )E7403 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55406 ttgaaettes faciles ab E eler A IE z I,°,ti rE� r rflr EJt3E z le g rrt AItEf1Y{ 1 E)r, e rws de vu,�vl r+�..c�rt� era rl,_t,f 1 r r fiejr rrd eop-up"', 1-800-GO-AVERY � v h / lt� vyb � snow „^��,. a K s F _,:.- Abp {/fed" -�A� �•:1\,p°r 5 } Sy � E W C, .P't � 7 P � s r 3 ' X ,r"t 4e gilgil E n r e, a a" T� a v f�aa Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 TO: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director& HPC FROM: Forum Phi Architecture RE: 114 Neale Avenue DATE: April 5, 2013 Dear Director, Forum Phi requests your approval of an Historic Preservation Land Use Application for Major Development (Final) Review for our project at 114 Neale Avenue. The subject property is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. Existing conditions on the property consist of a single family residence comprised of an 1880's miner's cabin and a "modern" addition from 1998. Our proposal consists of an expansion and reconfiguration of the existing "modern" addition, expansion of the non-historic portion of the structure below grade, the addition of a garage partially below grade, and a planted grass roof deck over the garage. As part of Conceptual Design approval the HPC has granted a front yard variance of six feet for subgrade construction and a 400 square foot floor area bonus. This project redevelops the previous additions to reduce the amount of new construction which interacts with the historic resource and even restores elements of its structure. The expansion of the existing addition utilizes its off-axis orientation to help distinguish the original structure from the new. The floor of the proposed addition steps down, allowing the new roof to be lower and making the new addition feel subordinate to the historic resource. In order to provide a garage, the driveway utilizes the natural slope of the rear portion of the site. The garage has no visible connections to the historic resource. Above the garage is a walkable grass roof deck which effectively restores the cabin's relationship to a flatter grade typical of such historic structures. The expansion of this deck caused the project to exceed its allowable floor area and HPC has granted a 400 square foot bonus during Conceptual Review for this expansion. The original miner's cabin was built c.1880 and has since received multiple land use decisions (see attached). In 1998, the parcel was granted a Historic Landmark Lot Split. The cabin was moved up the hill and a modern addition was approved and completed. In 2006 and 2007 HPC approved with conditions applications for Major Development (Conceptual) and Major Development (Final) with a variance from the Residential Design Standards for the addition of a detached garage and an expansion of the modern addition. Neither portion of this project was ever realized. This Land Use Application is complete per Major Development (Final) Requirements listed in the City of Aspen Community Development Department's Historic Preservation Application Package. As requested, compliance with relevant City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and verification of compliance with City of Aspen Residential Design Standards is addressed in the attached pages. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA, Partner Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970)279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 114 Neale Avenue Major Development Review (Conceptual) RDS Compliance 26.410.040 A. Site design 1. The street-facing facade of the existing principal structure is parallel to the street. 2. The entire front facade exists non-conforming inside the front yard setback line. 3. The proposed fence is 30" high. B. Building form 1. The site is located outside of the Aspen Infill Area, so a secondary mass is not required. C. Parking, garages and carports 1. Access from private road or alley. N/A 2. Access from public street. The site is accessed from a side public street and there are no street-facing garage facades. The driveway cut within the setback will not exceed the existing condition. The vehicular entrance with of the proposed garage is less than 24' D. Building elements 1. Street Oriented Entrance and Principal Window. Existing to remain unchanged. 2. First Story Element. Existing to remain unchanged. 3. Windows. No windows are proposed to span between 9' and 12' above the finished first floor. No non-orthagonal windows are proposed. 4. Lightwells. All Iightwells are entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building. E. Context 1. Materials. The quality, details, and application of exterior materials are consistent on all sides of the building, are not highly reflective, and are used in ways that are true to their characteristics. 2. Inflection. N/A Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 114 Neale Avenue HPC Major Development Review(Final) City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Compliance Introduction The property at 114 Neale Avenue is listed in the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. As required for submittal, this letter of compliance is for HPC Final Review. Streetscape and Lot Features This project received a historic lot split in 1990 when the historic structure was relocated from 17 Queen Street to 114 Neale Avenue. Due to this relocation, the site does not retain its original histroric context, its original relationship to grade, or any historically significant landscaping features. A tree removal permit application from the Parks Department has been completed for the removal of several trees along the north and east sides of the property. Please see attached Forum Phi to Amy Guthrie. Three fences exist on the property, but none are historic. A new wood picket fence is proposed in front of the building. This fence is low to the ground, transparent in nature, and within the historic character and scale of a miner's cottage fence. A privacy fence not to exceed six feet will be erected to replace the existing fence at the east side yard along the driveway. An existing privacy fence will remain at the south side of the property and the short length of fence on the west side will be removed. The existing walkway to the historic structure is off center and slightly meandering. No changes are proposed, but if that changes, a proposed walkway will be perpendicular to the street and front entry, returning the aproach to a historic semi-public experience. This new walkway would be concrete or sandstone materials. New retaining walls will be used only to retain earth where necessary. Additions to the landscape will be consistent with typical landscaping of historic Aspen and will have minimal impact on the historic structure. Proposed exterior lights are simple in form and character and have low levels of luminescence. Lighting fixtures are shielded and located to minimize the visual impacts onto adjacent properties and facade planes. An existing ditch is culverted and will remain in its current location at the north side of the property. It is currently crossed by a gravel drive and a proposed driveway will remain in this location as approved by the City of Aspen Engineering Department. Historic Building Materials The historic structure does not contain any masonry materials. It is wood framed with horizontal wood clapboard siding. The siding has been well maintained and remains intact. Any areas requiring repair or maintenance will be done in place. Portions of the historic structure will be repaired or reconstructed where the existing additions connect. This reconstruction will be consistent with the original structure, materials, and finishes following proper preparation. Refer to the General Guidelines section for additional paint description. Original materials will not be covered by any new materials. Any and all previous covering materials will be removed. Windows and Doors The miner's cabin's windows are single hung type with distinctive surrounding casings and sills. Several have been replaced, though they all maintain the original historic character. The existing windows will be repaired and maintained as required, but will otherwise remain unchanged. No changes will be made to their character-defining features. Replacement windows are not anticipated for this project. If required, any replacements will preserve the historic character of openings, design, materials, size and proportion, and profile. Storm windows are not proposed. The historic structure has two original glass panel exterior doors, one at the primary street-facing entry and a second on the south facade. These doors will remain and will be maintained in order to preserve integrity, function, size, appearance, design and color. Storm doors are not proposed. Porches The primary porch on the front facade is historic and will remain and be maintained. Any required repairs will be sensitive to the original design, proportions, and materials. Architectural Details Distinct architectural details exist on the historic structure, specifically the porch columns and large bay window on the south facade. These details represent those typical of the mining period and will be maintained and repaired only where required. Any repairs and/or replacements will be documented prior to submission of a building permit and construction. Roofs The existing roof maintains the original form, eave depths, and chimney. No skylights, rooftop devices, or other additions have been added to the historic structure, and no such features are proposed. The existing shake shingles are not original, but they are in character with the original design and will not be removed or replaced, except where necessary. Secondary Structures The property does not contain any historically significant secondary structures. Building Relocation & Foundations The historic structure was relocated in 1998 after a historic lot split. During this relocation, the foundation was rebuilt to accommodate a lower level under the historic structure. This foundation is poured concrete and does not likely match the character of the original foundation. The 1998 foundation will remain and in some areas be reconstructed or repaired to support the proposed addition. Three light wells are proposed for egress from the below-grade living spaces. They will be located behind the street-facing facade. Building Additions In 1998 an addition was constructed while preserving the character of the historic structure. This addition has no historic significance and will be removed. However, the linking elements to the historic structure will remain as connection for the proposed addition. The proposed addition has been designed such that the character of the historic structure is maintained, even improved. The proposed addition, an angled bar following the east setback boundary, is designed to be recognized as a product of its own time. The style of the proposed addition is modern and will be located at the rear of the historic structure, with minimal visibility from the street-facing facade. It is distinguishable from the historic structure, with materials of concrete, steel, and glass. The shed roof of the proposed addition is designed at a slightly lower elevation than the historic structure and will not interfere with the existing roof. All portions of the addition will be located behind the primary street-facing setback. Most of the new floor area will be located subgrade. The proposed floor area is approximately 1,720 square feet. This exceeds the maximum allowable floor area for the parcel (1,345 square feet). However, HPC has granted a 400 square foot floor area bonus at Conceptual Review. With the bonus floor area, the maximum allowable floor area for the parcel will total 1,745 square feet. This site is not within the Main Street Historic District nor the Commercial Core Historic District, and does not involve a new primary structure on a historic parcel. General Guidelines The historic structure is currently coordinated in one overall color scheme with several accents at windows and columns, however, this scheme likely does not match the original condition. The original color will be researched and the project to restore the historic finish will be presented to the client. Any new color schemes chosen for the historic structure will be simple, coordinated, and consistent with the character of a miner's cottage. The proposed addition will also be coordinated with the historic scheme, while remaining distinguishable in color and material. Exterior lighting will be placed in select locations for safety and egress only. Wall mounted fixtures will be located on the new addition only and away from the street-facing facade. Step lights will be located along exterior stairways and within light wells. Linear lighting is planned at the parapet wall of the green roof and along the driveway to provide light for vehicular access. The surface of the historic structure will be maintained, repaired, and cleaned where necessary. The methods used will be low impact and follow the recommendations of the preservation design guidelines. Any repainting methods will be planned carefully. Mechanical and service areas will be buried, located, or relocated within and without the proposed addition away from the primary street facade. All facades of the historic structure will remain free of mechanical and service equipment. This proposal rectifies an existing undesirable condition. Existing standpipes, meters, and other service equipment currently located on a historic facade will be relocated. The proposed driveway will be accessed from the existing curb cut on King Street. This driveway exists as a short gravel drive. It will be extended along the east side of the property and paved with pervious pavers. A small parking area will be maintained where the existing gravel drive is located. It will be screened by landscaping from the primary building facade. Although the proposed garage is attached to the addition, it faces south and will not be visible from the primary street-facing west facade. The project is a single-family residence and will not utilize any signage. An existing sign will remain located on the front facade indicating the project is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures. C A N O S G K Recessed Wall Luminaire Project Name Address City State ZIP Dimensions ! C A.N O S 0 K Recessed Wall Luminaire Luminaire Weight=7 Ibs vwwo.hessamerica.com Type Model Watt Lamp Volt Mounting Finish Option CA230GK 13 CF-Compact 2- 120 R-Recessed SG-Silver Grey 30K-3000K Fluorescent GG-Graphite Lamp Grey 35K-3500K CC-Custom Lamp Color 41 K-4100K Lamp Ordering Information CA230GK 13 CF -, 2 Comment Specifications are subject to change without notification HessAmerica.P.O.Box 28.Gaffney,SC 29342. Phone.864-487-3535.Fax:864-487-3175.www.hessamerica.com hess r Specifications DESCRIPTION Small recessed luminaire for exterior and interior wall mounted applications where contemporary styling is desired. HOUSING Luminaire housing and faceplate are cast aluminum. Faceplate and matte acrylic lens are secured to the housing with four captive socket head cap screws and sealed with one-piece silicone gasket. Interior of housing is finished in white paint, Sealed wiring compartment at rear of housing has access plate to permit power connection to terminal block. Luminaire installs into recessed formed aluminum rough-in housing. Rough-in housing assembly includes adjustable protective cover to compensate for variations in finished wall thicknesses up to 1.97". Rough-in housing assembly is suitable for through wiring and may be preshipped upon request.All hardware is stainless steel. OPTICS Lamp is positioned within housing providing diffused illumination. ELECTRICAL Compact fluorescent electromagnetic ballast for 120v operation shall be Class P and Outdoor Type 1 rated. Ballast shall have a minimum high power factor rating of 90%and be capable of reliable starting to 0° F(-18° C)at nominal line voltage. Total harmonic distortion shall be less than 10%. GX23 lamp socket is 75w-600v rated. LAMPING Wattage 13 Source Compact Fluorescent Lamp CFT13W/GX23 Bulb PL-S Base GX23 Lamp is included. Specify lamp color temperatures of 3000 K, 3500 K, or 4100 K. FINISH Housing is cleaned ultrasonically prior to painting. Standard finish is finely textured matte silver grey metallic or graphite grey. Special colors available on request. WARRANTY Limited product warranty period is three years. Lamp and ballast shall carry the manufacturer's limited warranty. CERTIFICATION @�Listed for Wet Locations. Suitable for use in exterior, interior, and poured concrete walls. Specifications are subject to change without notification HessAmerica.P.O. Box 28.Gaffney,SC 29342.Phone:864-487-3535.Fax:864-487-3175.www.hessamerica.com hess ti L E D I A LL 36"LED Illuminating Strip-Recessed Wall Project Name Address City State ZIP Dimensions oil V11,A, L. L E D I A.LL 36"LED Illuminating Strip• Recessed Wall Luminaire&Frame Weight= 18 Ibs www.hessamerica.com Type Model Length Volt Color Option LEDIA-LL-ID/W-Indoor 36 12- 12 Volt DC R-Red DIM-Dimming LEDIA-LL-OD/W-Outdoor B-Blue Module G-Green N-None A-Amber WW-Warm White (3000K) W-White(6500K) Ordering Information »,» .36� J 2 Comment F- Specifications are subject to change without notification HessAmerica.P.O.Box 28.Gaffney,SC 29342, Phone:864-487-3535.Fax:864-487-3175.www.hessarnerica.com hess 1 / 1 Specifications DESCRIPTION LED illuminating strip for recessed wall applications. HOUSING Machined tempered glass lens is 0.75"thick and bonded to the stainless steel luminaire housing providing a sealed enclosure. Exterior surface of lens is polished with chamfered edges. Underside of lens is diffused. LED light engine housing is constructed of stainless steel.All internal components are sealed to prevent moisture entry. Luminaire with brushed stainless steel end brackets mounts into recessed stainless steel frame where electrical connections are made and secured in place with two countersunk screws for flush appearance. Recessed frame for rough-in installation may be preshipped upon request. OPTICS Low wattage LED's provide even illumination across the entire lens surface. ELECTRICAL Remote 60w LED driver is sold separately and may be used to power multiple luminaires. Universal voltage LED driver accepts 100v through 277v, 50/60 Hz input and provides 12v DC to luminaire. Driver shall have a high power factor rating greater than 95%. Maximum power consumption is 71 watts. UL Recognized driver has a minimum start temperature is-25°C(-1 3°F)and maximum ambient rating of 38°C (100°F). Luminaire is supplied with pigtail connectors and waterproof wire nuts.Wiring from LED power supply to luminaire and wiring between luminaires shall be supplied by others. Optional dimming module, suitable for dry locations, is available and requires a 10v DC voltage controller(by others). LAMPING Total power consumption is 10 watts. Colors are available in red, blue, green, amber,warm white (3000K)and white(6500K) NOTE : Due to rapid and continuous advances in LED technology, LED luminaire data is subject to change without notice and at the discretion of HessAmerica. Consult factory for more current technical data. WARRANTY Limited product warranty period is three years. LED driver(ordered separately)and optional dimming module shall carry the respective manufacturer's limited warranty. CERTIFICATION <Pi,-Listed for Wet Locations Specifications are subject to change without notification HessAmerica.P.O.Box 28.Gaffney,SC 29342. Phone:864-487-3535.Fax:864-487-3175.www.hessamerica.com hess V A R E L L 0 3 0 0 Wall Mounted Luminaire Project Name Address City State ZIP Dimensions 0 11 V A R E L L 0 3 0 0 Wail Mounted Luminaire Luminaire=7 Ibs vwwu.hessamerica.com Type Model Watt Lamp Volt Mounting Finish Option VL300 13 CF-Compact 2- 120 W-Wall Mount SG-Silver Grey N-None 18 Fluorescent 7-277 CC-Custom Color Ordering Information 0":J F........ CF - r W... .............. FN"wil Comment Specifications are subject to change without notification HessAmerica.P.O.Box 28.Gaffney,SC 29342.Phone:864-487-3535.Fax:864-487-3175.www.hessamerica.com hers Specifications DESCRIPTION Wall mounted luminaire where contemporary styling is desired. HOUSING Cylindrical housing is machined from 6060 extruded aluminum alloy tubing. Semi-cylindrical front lens fits flush to the housing. Matte acrylic lens is sealed to the housing with one-piece closed cell silicone gasket and secured with six captive flathead countersunk screws. Upper and lower lens rings are precision machined from 6060 aluminum and sealed to the housing with one-piece diecut closed cell silicone gaskets. Matte acylic upper and lower lenses are bonded to the lens rings with silicone. Luminaire with cast aluminum bracket mounts to wall surface with factory-supplied wall anchors and hardware.All hardware is stainless steel. OPTICS Vertical base down lamp provides soft diffused illumination through front, upper, and lower matte acrylic lenses. ELECTRICAL Compact fluorescent high frequency electronic ballast shall be Class P and Outdoor Type 1 rated. Ballast shall have a minimum high power factor rating of 90%and a minimum starting temperature of-20°F (-30°C) at nominal line voltage±10%. Ballast shall be UL Listed. Lamp sockets are 75w- 600v rated. LAMPING Wattage 13 18 Source Compact Fluorescent Compact Fluorescent Lamp PL-C 13W/4P PL-L 18W/4P Bulb PL-C PL-L Base G24q-1 2611 Lamp is included. FINISH Housing is cleaned ultrasonically prior to painting. Standard finish is finely textured matte silver grey metallic. Special colors available on request. WARRANTY Limited product warranty period is three years. Lamp and ballasts shall carry the manufacturer's limited warranty. CERTIFICATION a&Listed for Wet Locations. Specifications are subject to change without notification HessAmerica.P.O.Box 28.Gaffney,SC 29342.Phone:864-487-3535.Fax:864-487-3175.www.hessamerica.com hess Specifications _...... s w Specifications are subject to change without notification HessAmerica.P.O.Box 28.Gaffney,SC 29342.Phone:864-487-3535.Fax:864-487-3175.www.hessamerica.com hess a xAl } 114 Neale Avenue-HPC Final Review-Gray Ipe Screen 4 Z3 C O U 6v �� LL P � e< 4 k s x °y�p1 m f� V' B 4 IF v. 4 N4 IP 4 � r '._. ,�. dry. `t•' a. .. e'.YA7i�rJ<��•.! .]o"'a4 7 kdY '-..•i�rsT.,G,-. k'P':as'q°+4'M`iTM14+91fJ�� w �� '.•v - :i 114 Neale Avenue-HPC Final Review-Standing Seam Metal c r �f I ,F� y ��,r .�';.0� '�,�" nay. .� �•�" 1' -- -. _ U: 711 PLO w 114 Neale Avenue-HPC Final Review-West Elevation - ,, " �r _y gi y 7, .ors H^► �`�� :.' S' Y � v J06 � � Vii* ,*-. � t•�'��. r "k tqo loll f a i � '� "s� '� •• t S.R. ; 1 � n - i a t �u f f � I ;,s. SAC,-.:r•. .,. . IMF AM\ fir ` N - a C J LL mXk U +r�air c ursr mw y Q win � m Jow i i�w�swef+� t � r »' Y I -- - 1 i 1� t r .•1r, ��.ti �� F � v . � J i 1 l ►r, t `r 114 Neale Avenue-HPC Final Review-Northeast Elevation Xl- :- IrL i�ZM /•.+, _f ,c _ ( -.+ sd.{'f ;:p ! �ft.� a � ; :t7 �, .>'�, 4'3r�. t.Qr 1w•'.��� 1'� o,�, .._..�:,."✓ _.�sr .'�,..r.,:`ef_.�.b.:x.. •� Y.i�.-.1�• J- � .. �r � � � e�1:��'i'�.a-� 'ri :. .,� �"' .�.� v i-._.��-`�. ... a mss':;'.�. YIIIIIIr1111N1111 '� '+A1111111n ��i�RUUaur.u.... ,.� 114 Neale Avenue-HPC Final Review-Aspen Mountian View Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 MEMORANDUM TO: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Forum Phi Architecture RE: 114 Neale Parks Opinion DATE: November 8, 2012 Dear Amy, I met Chris Forman, City of Aspen Forester at the site this morning to discuss the possibility and probability of removing trees from the property as necessary for future approved development. Although we share his opinion that trees should not be removed carelessly, Chris is of the opinion that, based on location, size, grouping, health, and structural quality, there are no trees on the site that must be preserved. He reminded us that certain development proposals may jeopardize trees not intended to be removed and to be wary of removing trees that neighbors will object to due to, for example, views, other lines-of-sight, or rightful ownership issues. We understand that this is not an approved tree removal permit, but rather direction for further conversation regarding an appropriate site plan strategy. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA, Partner Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 MEMORANDUM TO: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Forum Phi Architecture RE: 114 Neale Engineering Opinion DATE: November 8, 2012 Dear Amy, We met Josh Rice, City of Aspen Engineer to discuss the placement of a new curb cut on Neale Avenue. Josh is of the opinion that, due to both high speeds and high accident incidence, the engineering department will not approve a curb cut on Neale Avenue. The department would prefer that the access remain on King Street. We understand that this is not an approval, but rather direction for an appropriate site plan strategy. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA, Partner "P;k rWIN pro i, ammT r r C 0 ;P Agreement to Pay Application F 'I?pyDEVTI.OP,ECr�'TT Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City")and Property Steev Wilson, on behalf of DWS Family Trust Phone No.:(970)279-4109 Owner("I"): Email:swilson @forumphi.com Address of 114 Neale Avenue Billing 117 S Spring St, Ste 202 Property: Aspen, CO 81611 Address: (subject of p (send bills here) Aspen, CO 81611 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $_0 flat fee for Select Dept $0 flat fee for Select Dept $0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 1,950 deposit for 6 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$325 per hour. $ 0 deposit for 0 hours of Engineering Department staff time.Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Chris Bendon Steev Wilson,on behalf of DWS Family Trust Community Development Director Name: City Use: �(�y% ci Title: Representative Fees Due:$ 950 Received: $ a File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help Jump 1 zc Main Custom Fields Routing Status Fee Summary Actions RoutingHistory.... z _.... ___._.................. ._...... ._ ° Pemdt type ahpc >jAspen Historic Land Use Pemat k 0014.2013.AHPC Address 114 N EALE AVE Apt/Suite) City)ASPEN State CO Zip 81611 Permit Information Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied 04/08/2013 ......... -_ �.,. .. ........ , .... .. f, Project Status pending Approved: Descriptan FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Issued Closed/Final -.. ;; ._ ............................ Submitted Clock Running Days; 0 Empires 04/03/2014 ... .. ... ..._ :... Submitted via t 13 ..P ........ Owner _ .......__.. ................................... . ......... _......_..... .....: 1 'Last name IDWS FAMILY TRUST First name.DON W SHORT 13 REMINGTON LN s ......_ .._.... ......:.:..:: ........ ,HOUSTON TX77005 Phone (970]279-4109 Address ....... [[. Applicant Owner is applicant? Contractor is applicant? ) Last name WILSON Fist name!STEEV ':117 S OUTH SPRING ST _..... _ _-_._ =:202 Phone:(970)274-4109 jCust It 29461 AddressASPEN C081611 Lender Last name Fast name -----_• ; Phone ( ) Address: j AspenGold5(server) jackiek 1 of 1 06 2o I S VS" All Aj _ RECIPEWED APR 5 " 2013 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application CITE' OF ASPEN PROJECT: Name: 114 Neale Location: 114 Neale Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 1 - 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split (Indicate street address, lot&block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 2737 073 83 001 APPLICANT: Name: DWS Family Trust Address: 3 Remington Lane, Houston, TX 77005 Phone#: (713) 677-3265 Fax#: E-mail: don @brandvita.com REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Steev Wilson Address: Forum Phi, 117 S Spring St, Ste 202, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone#: (970)279-4109 Fax#: (866) 770-5585 E-mail: swilson @forumphi.com TYPE OF APPLICATION: lease check all that apply): ❑ Historic Designation ❑ Relocation (temporary, on ❑ Certificate of No Negative Effect ❑ or off-site) ❑ Certificate of Appropriateness ❑ Demolition (total ❑ -Minor Historic Development demolition) FxJ -Major Historic Development ❑ Historic Landmark Lot Split ❑ -Conceptual Historic Development 0 -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment ExISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Single Family Residence- Historic Miner's Cabin with modern addition. See previous approvals attached. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc. Single Family Residence-expansion of modern addition, addition of garage and basement level Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated:May 29,2007 RECEIVED APR 5 2013 CITY OF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY ° Wi1N1TY DEVELOPMENT PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.429.2797 DATE: 3.21.13 PROJECT: 114 Neale Avenue REPRESENTATIVE: Forum Phi Architecture DESCRIPTION: 114 Neale Avenue is a landmarked property. The owner plans a remodel and expansion and has received Conceptual design approval from the Historic Preservation Commission. As part of the approval, HPC granted a front yard variance of 6 feet for the subgrade construction and a 400 square foot floor area bonus. Final approval is needed. Final review focuses on landscape plan, lighting, fenestration and selection of new materials. A list of submittal requirements follows. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.D.4 Historic Preservation, Major Development, Final 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.050 R-15 Zone District Review by: Staff for completeness, HPC for determination Public Hearing: Yes Referral Agencies: None Planning Fees: $1,950 for 6 billable hours (additional hours are billed at $325 per hour) Referral Agency Fees: None Total Deposit: $1,950 Total Number of Application Copies: 12 To apply, please submit 1 copy of: ❑ Signed fee agreement with payment. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing And 12 copies of: ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. ❑ Final drawings of all proposed structures(s) and/or addition(s) included as part of the development at 1/4" = 1.0' scale. ❑ Landscape plan. ❑ An accurate representation of all major building materials to be used in the development, depicted through samples or photographs. ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. ❑ A statement, including narrative text or graphics, indicating how the final design conforms to representations made or stipulations placed as a condition of the approval of the conceptual design. Staff may request specific additional materials, including 3-D computer modeling. Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT DWS FAMILY TRUST 3REM|NGTONLANE HOUSTON, TX77OOb January 9.2O13 City of Aspen Community Development Department 13O South Galena Street, 3=Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 114 Neale Avenue Dear Director, / VV*hereby consent that �evVVi|oonandFmmmPNmaymubmKanyand �|LandUoo ^ They represent us| App|icuUonaonourbohoUforourpmPe�y� wymoym boh � U � and appmva|pm a a ceseen�Thoymaye��unnurhaho|f.ondmayo|000ignonour applications and permits, and any and all documents required or ancillary thereto. 8teev Wilson, Partner, A\A Forum Phi 117S Spring St, Ste 202 Aspen, CO81011 Thank you, Ginoans|y. Don W Short Date A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 114 NEALE AVENUE, LOT 1, 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION # , SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-83-001 WHEREAS,the applicant, DWS Family Trust, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, requested HPC Major Development (Conceptual) and Variance approval for the property located at 114 Neale Avenue, Lot 1, 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Subdivision; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS,the HPC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C.La, Variances. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, Justin Barker, in his staff report to HPC dated March 20, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 20, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of to 114 Neale Ave. HPC Resolution # , Series of 2013 Page 1 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants HPC Major Development (Conceptual) and Variance approval for the property located at 117 Neale Avenue with the following conditions: 1. HPC grant a front yard variance of 6 feet for the subgrade space. 2. Applicant must restudy the location of the north lightwell. 3. HPC grant a 378 square foot floor area bonus. 4. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 20th day of March, 2013. Ann Mullins, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 114 Neale Ave. HPC Resolution # , Series of 2013 Page 2 of 2 General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO _] Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? 56 ;1 Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? Ll X Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? X In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards,for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? 1 If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) I If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: Rehabilitation Loan Fund �_- Conservation Easement Program I_I Dimensional Variances ❑ Increased Density , 1 Historic Landmark Lot Split h Waiver of Park Dedication Fees Conditional Uses -1 Exemption from Growth Management Quota System F1 Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated:May 29,2007 ATTACHMENT 3- Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: 114 Neale Applicant: DWS Family Trust Project Location: 114 Neale Avenue,Aspen, CO 81611 Zone District: R-1 5A Lot Size: 6001 SF Lot Area: see Ord. 16 (1998) and Bret Theony to Chris Bendon attached (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: n/a Proposed: n/a Number of residential units: Existing: 1 Proposed. no change Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3 Proposed: 5 Proposed %of demolition: 37 DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing: 1014 Allowable: 1345+400 Proposed 1745 Height Principal Bldg.: Existing: 20 Allowable: 25 Proposed: 22 Accessory Bldg.: Existing: n/a Allowable: 25 Proposed: n/a On-Site parking: Existing: 0 Required.-_ 2 Proposed: 2 %Site coverage: Existing: Required n/a Proposed: %Open Space: Existing: Required: n/a Proposed Front Setback: Existing: 14 _Required: 25 Proposed: 19 Rear Setback: Existing:_ 10 Required__ 10 Proposed: 10 Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W Existing. Required.- n/a Proposed: Side Setback: N Existing: 10 Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Side Setback: S Existing: 10 Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Combined Sides: Existing: ----Required.-_ n/a Proposed. Distance between Existing: n/a Required: 10 Proposed: n/a buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: A portion of the existing Historic Resource and Lower Level below exists inside the front yard setback. We are not aware that any encroachment licenses have been issued. Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): All requested variances were approved by HPC at Conceptual Design Review. Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 Bret Thoeny 114 Neale Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 bretLboto.com April 15,2012 Chris Bendon CITY OF ASPEN Re: 114 Neale St. Chris, Tim Semrau and I are working on doing an addition for my house at 114 Neale Ave. The site historically had slopes over 20% along the northeastern corner of the Property, a 1991 redevelopment resulted in significant re-grading to create a "platform"for the relocated Victorian house. The grading around the base of the platform includes 20-30% slopes, but these are man-made. The areas of steep slope that appear on the most recent survey do not match the historic contours. We are requesting that no slope reduction take place for the existing conditions. Please review the attached surveys and proposed plans. If you agree please sign this letter below so Amy can proceed with our application. Thank you for your help. Approv by. *K Bret Thoeny AIA Chris Bendon Cc. Amy Guthrie Enc. Survey& Proposed Plans ORDINANCE No. 16 (SERIES OF 1998) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR AN HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT AT 114 NEALE AVENUE/17 QUEEN STREET (PARCEL 1, OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, CITY OF ASPEN,COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO) ASPEN, COLORADO,AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4.11 OF THE ASPEN CITY CHARTER This ordinance has been adopted as an emergency ordinance in accordance with Section 4.11 of the City of f Aspen Charter. The facts showing such urgency and need are set forth below. WHEREAS,pursuant to Sections 26.88.030(A)(2)and (5) and 26.72.010(G)of the Municipal Code,an Historic Landmark Lot Split is a subdivision exemption subject to review and approval by City Council after obtaining a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission (hereinafter HPC); and WHEREAS,the applicants, Henry and Lana Trettin,have requested to split the 21,161 square foot parcel to create two separate single-family residential lots of 6,001 square feet and 15, 160 square feet; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 26.72.010(G)of the Municipal Code,the HPC reviewed the request for the historic lot split at a properly noticed public hearing on May 13, 1998 and recommended, by a vote of 6-0, approval with conditions; and WHEREAS,the Community Development Department has reviewed the application and recommended approval of the I listoric Landmark Lot Split, with conditions; and WHEREAS,the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the subdivision exemption under the applicable provisions of Chapters 26.88, of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered those recommendations made by the Community Development Department, and the Historic Preservation Commission, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the Historic Landmark Lot Split, with conditions,meets or exceeds all applicable development standards of the above referenced Municipal Code sections; and WHEREAS, the City Council has declared an emergency in accordance with Section 4.11 of the City of Aspen Charter; and 1111111 i1f111111111111111111 11111 1111111111111111111111 440652 02/18/2000 11:158 ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 1 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO WHEREAS,the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the public health, safety and welfare. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,THAT: Section 1: That the City Council does hereby declare an emergency pursuant to Section 4.11 of the Aspen City Charter for the preservation of public property, health, peace and safety of the City of Aspen and its citizens inasmuch as the applicant has represented that the consummation of a sale of the property is contingent upon receipt of final land use approval on or before May 28, 1998, and applicant was inadvertently misinformed by City staff and final approval could be obtained from the Historic Preservation Commission. Section 2: Pursuant to Sections 26.88.030(A)(2) and (5), and Section 26.72.010(G) of the Municipal Code, and subject to those conditions of approval as specified herein, the City Council finds as follows in regard to the subdivision exemption: 1. The applicant's submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and evaluation for approval; and 2. The subdivision exemption is consistent with the purposes of subdivision as outlined in Section 26.8 8.010 of the Municipal Code, which purposes include: assist in the orderly and efficient development of the City; ensure the proper distribution of development; encourage the well-planned subdivision of land by establishing standards for the design of a subdivision; improve land records and survey monuments by establishing standards for surveys and plats; coordinate the construction of public facilities with the need for public facilities; safeguard the interests of the public and the subdivider and provide consumer protection for the purchaser; and, promote the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen. Section 3: Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 2, above, the City Council does hereby grant an subdivision exemption for 114 Neale Avenue/17 Queen Street with the following conditions: 1. A subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development and Engineering Departments and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder within one hundred eighty (180) days of final approval by City Council. Failure to record the plat and subdivision exemption agreement within the specified time limit shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall: 11111111111 IIN11111111111111111 111111 11111111 NIl 1111 440652 02/18/2000 11:15A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 2 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO a. Meet the requirements of Section 26.88.040(D)(2)(a) of the Aspen Municipal Code; b. Contain a plat note stating that development of the new/southerly lot created by the lot split shall be required to mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(c) of the Municipal Code; c. Contain a plat note stating that the lots contained therein shall be prohibited from applying for further subdivision and any development of the lots will comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; d. The two lots created by this lot split shall have a total allowable base FAR, on both lots combined, equal to 5,290 square feet of floor area prior to consideration of potentially applicable lot area reductions (i.e., slopes, access easements, etc.). The applicant shall verify with the City Zoning Officer the total allowable FAR on each lot, taking into account any and all applicable lot area reductions. The property shall be subdivided into one parcel (the northerly parcel) of 6,001 square feet and a second parcel (the southerly parcel) of 15,160 square feet. Provided it is found by the Zoning Officer that no lot area reductions are required, the maximum allowable FAR on the northerly parcel will be 1,345 s.f. (plus the potential for a 500 square foot floor area bonus if granted by the HPC) and 3,945 square feet of floor area on southerly parcel. The information verified by the City Zoning Officer shall be included on the plat, as a plat note; 2. As a minimum, the subdivision exemption agreement shall include the elements outlined in Section 26.88.050 of the Aspen Municipal Code, and shall meet the recording and timing requirements described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(e). 3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on either lot, the applicant shall sign a sidewalk, curb and gutter construction agreement and pay the applicable recording fees. 4. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings with the HPC and City Council shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by HPC or City Council. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. I IIllll fllll 111111 IIIII IIIII IIIII IIl!!I III !1111 llll llll 440652 02/16/2000 11:15A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 3 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Section 4: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the 27th day of May, 1998 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 26th day of May, 1998. Ra he] Richards, Mayo Pro Tem { !' ;•Kathryn {ctc , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: .7 r ' � John orce ter, City Attorney FINALLY,adopted,passed and approved this 27th day of May, 1998. (\n� R hel Richards, May Pro Tem , 'A Kathryn �c , City Clerk l�llli Illll l�llll l��lr 11111 lll�l Illl 440662 02/18/2000 11:13A N1111 11111 fill 1111 4 of 4 R 20 ORDTNA .00 D DAVIS U 0.00 N 0.00 PITKINCOUNTYCo BEATON GLENN K BLEEKER STREET REV TRUST BRIEN ALICE 936 KING ST 32 TULIP ST 110 NEALE AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 SUMMIT, NJ 07901 ASPEN, CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN DECRAY MARCELLA TRUST 50% FUENTE DAVID&SHEILA ATTN FINANCE DEPT DECRAY MARCELLA PROPERTY TRUST 701 TERN POINT CIR 130 S GALENA ST 50% ASPEN, CO 81611 30 COMMONWEALTH AVE BOCA RATON, FL 33431 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118 GIRVIN LINDA A GREENWOOD WILLIAM S GUPTA BENJAMIN K REV LIV TRST 2010 414 N MILL ST PO BOX 4778 9017 GREENSBORO LN ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LAS VEGAS, NV 89134 HATANAKA HOWARD I ISAAC THOMAS D REV TRST KAPPELI ERNST 980 KING ST 975 KING ST PO BOX 1962 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 KASABACH JACQUELYN A LANG DONALD W LAWRENCE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 4166 PO BOX 4166 8560 RUETTE MONTE CARLO ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 LIPSEY WILLIAM S LOEWENSTERN CAROL TRUST MAPLE CHARLES A& BRYCE M 955 KING ST 910 GIBSON AVE 927 GIBSON AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MARZIALE ANTONIO MEADOWS JEAN R& STANLEY H MICKEY JAMES&MARLENE 5134 TANGLE LN 538 HILLSIDE DR 931 GIBSON AVE HOUSTON, TX 77056 HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035 ASPEN, CO 81611 MORRIS JAMES/BYARD ANNE TRUST MORSE JAMES A TRUST PARRY SUSAN LYNN 860 GIBSON AVE 800 E ELLIS RD PO BOX 2529 ASPEN, CO 81611 NORTON SHORES, MI 49441-5622 ASPEN, CO 81612 RIVER HOUSE LLC SHOAF JEFFREY S SKOKOS THEODORE C&SHANNON B 28 W GRAND AVE PO BOX 3123 PO BOX 17330 MONTVALE, NJ 07645 ASPEN, CO 81612 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72222 SNOW ORCHID LLC VARE DARLENE DESEDLE TRUST WEISMAN FAMILY LP 1125 SAN MATEO DR 1024 19TH ST#7 2708 IRVING AVE SOUTH MENLO PARK, CA 94025 SANTA MONICA, CA 90403 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55406 ATTACHMENT 6 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 200 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of'notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this day of 200, by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 T ATTORNEYS TITLE GUARANTY FUND, INC. ALTA Commitment Form (6117/2006) l"'I"ll I itII COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), for valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and 8 and to the Conditions of the Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. has caused its corporate name to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. ATTORNEYS TITLE GUARANTY FUND, INC. r— ERIC R. MORGAN PRESIDENT FOR INFORMATION OR SERVICES W CONNECTION WITH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT: Winter T. Van Alstine, 715 W. Main Street, Suite 305, Aspen Colorado 81611, Phone: (970) 925-7328, Fax: (970)925-7348 Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Tale Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the Proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the Proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named Proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith(a)to comply with the requirements hereof, or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or(c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the Proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action of actions or rights of action that the Proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of the Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is$2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at <http://222.alta.org//>. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. American Lalld I ItleA5soclatioll Commitment Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc COMMITMENT NO. PC201208012598 File No. PC]2002992 SCIIEDULE A I. Effective Date: 8/6/2012 at 7:45 A.M. - - - - 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Premium A. ALTA Owner's Policy(06/17/06), Amount $2,445,000.00 $2,356.00 Proposed Insured: Donald W. Short and Ann M. Short Certificate ofTaxes Due $25.00 Endorsements: 1 10.1(1, 2, 3 and 4), 130 $50.00 Additional Charges: $0.00 Total $ 2,431.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is vested in Bret F. Thoeny and Lissa L. Zwahlen 4. Tile estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is Fee Simple 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is situate in the county of PITKiN, State of Colorado and is described as follows: See Schedule C attached hereto. For informational purposes only, the property address is: 114 Neale Avenue,Aspen, Colorado 81611 Winter T. Van Alstine Authorized Officer or Agent 2622 Member Number FOR INFORMATION OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT: Winter T. Van Alstine, 715 W. Main Sheet, Suite 305, Aspen Colorado 81611, Phone: (970) 925-7328, Fax: (970) 925-7348 THIS COMMITMENT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE STATE,NIENT OF'I E101S. CONDITIONS AND STINULA7 IONS ATTACHED Copyright 21H16-'009 Ameman Land Title Asuxialiun.All right;resened.the use of thi Furst is restricted lu ALTA licenxcs anti AJ,'CA mcm}xrs in good Standing as of the dale of use.All other We,are pnahibitzd.Reprinted under license Iran,the American Land Tilh Association. American Land Title Association Commitment Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. COMMITMENT NO.PC201208012598 FILE No. PC 12002992 SCHEDULE B-Section I -Requirements The following are the requirements to be complied with: a. Pay the agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. b. Pay us the premiums fees and charges for the policy. c. Documents satisfactory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed,delivered and recorded. d. You must tell its in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on [lie land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. e. Payment of all taxes, charges and assessments, levied and assessed against the suhject premises which are due and payable. f. A Certification of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or an authorized agent(pursuant to Senate Bill 92-143,CRS 10-1 1-122). g. Receipt by the Company of the appropriate affidavit as to new construction and indemnifying the Company against any whiled malerialmen's or mechanic's liens. h. Warranty Deed mast be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to herein, from Bret F.Thoeny and Lissa L. Zwahlen to Donald W. Short and Ann M. Short,the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A.NOTE: C.R.S.A§38-35-109(2)required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address,(not necessarily the same as the property address)be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded. i. Release of the Deed of Trust from Bret F.Thoeny and Lissa L. Zwahlen to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Affiliated Financial Group, Inc. to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $700,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby,dated July 22,2002,and recorded July 23,2002,as Reception No.470114. J. Release of the Deed of Trust from Bret F.Thoeny,and Lissa L. Zwahlen to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Countrywide Home Loans,Inc. to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $1,500,000.00,and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby,dated November 27,2006,and recorded November 27,2006,as Reception No. 531503. k. Improvement Survey Plat sufficient in form and content and certified to the Company.Exception will be taken to adverse matters disclosed thereby. Note: If the sales price of the subject property exceeds $100,000.00, the seller shall be required to comply with tiie disclosure or withholding provisions of C.R.S. §39-22.604.5 (non-resident withholding). Note: Effective September 1, 1997, C.R.S. 130-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform. Note: All conveyances (deeds) subject to the documentary fee submitted to the county clerk and recorder for recordation must be accompanied by a Real Property Transfier Declaration. This Declaration must be completed and signed by the grantor(seller)or grantee(buyer). Copyright 70176-2009 American L:md Title A>,,,Jaion All right,tesened. The use of this Fomt is restricted to Al.FA licensees and Al.IA members in gexd st;:rding as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license Gom the American Lund-I We Avocialwn. TATTO RN E Ys TITLE GUARAN'I-Y HIND, INC. Committed to Protecting Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the hrtnre,we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information-particularly any personal or financial information.You have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore,ATGF has adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the iinformation that you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source,such as Information obtained frorll a public record or from another person or entity. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications,forms and in other communications to us,whether in writing,in person,by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us,our agents,or others; and • Information we receive from a consumer-reportijig agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party.Therefore,we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except:(1)as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us;or(2)as permitted by law.We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose,such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our agents or affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include Attorneys Title Insurance Fund,Inc., ATGF's reinsurer and parent company. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer,our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities that need to know that information to provide products or services to you.We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy. We currently maintain physical,electronic,and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. SCHEDULE C File#: PC12002992 Lot 1, as shown on the Subdivision Exemption Plat of 114 NEALEl17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 29, 1988 in Plat Book 45 at Page 17,Pitkin County,Colorado. American Land Title Association Commitment Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. COMMITMENT NO.PC201208012598 FILE No. PC 12002992 SCHEDULE B-Section 2-Exceptions Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: I. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements,not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any,created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes for the year 2012 not yet due or payable. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in the United States Patent dated August 21, 1958,and recorded August 29, 1958, in Book 185 at Page 69,as Reception No. 106874,as follows: right of way for ditches or canals as constricted by the authority of the United States. 8. Any and all notes,easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Boundary Agreement Plat recorded April 29, 1982,in Book 13 at Page 35,as Reception No. 240935, 9. Terms, conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance Designating a Portion of 17 Queen Street as H,Historic Landmark Pursuant to Division 7, Section 7-701 of the Land Use Code, dated March 12, 1990, and recorded August 21, 1990,in Book 627 at Page 834,as Reception No. 325486. 10.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Covenant Burdening Real Property dated April 8, 1991,and recorded July 1, 1991,in Book 650 at Page 264,as Reception No. 334163. 11.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance of the City Council,of the City of Aspen,Colorado,Designating 17 Queen Street,a Metes and Bounds Parcel of Land being part of Tract 40, East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen as "H",Historic Landmark Pursuant to Section 26.76.030 of the Aspen Municipal Code,dated January 13, 1997,and recorded September 3, 1997, as Reception No.407978. 12.Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Subdivision Exemption Plat for 114 Neale/ 17 Queen Street Lot Split PIat recorded May 29, 1998,in Plat Book 45 at Page 17,as Reception No. 417433. 13.Terms,conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Approving an Application for Minor Development to Remodel a Historic House at 114 Neal Avenue,City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado(Parcel ID# 2737-073-83-001),Resolution No.49,Series of 1999,dated October 27, 1999,and recorded November 12, 1999,as Reception No.437688. 14.Terns, conditions, provisions,agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance of the Aspen City Council Granting Approval for a Subdivision Exemption for an Historic Landmark Lot Split at 114 Neale Avenue/ 17 Queen Street(Parcel I,of the Boundary Agreement Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 35,City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado)Aspen, Colorado,and Declaring an Emergency in Accordance with Section 4.11 of the Aspen City Charter(Ordinance No. 16 - Series of 1998), dated May 26, 1998,and recorded February 18, 2000,as Reception No. 440652. American Land Title Association Commitment Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, lite, COMMITMENT NO.PC201208012598 FILL No.PC 12002992 SCHEDULE B-Section 2- Exceptions 15.Terms,conditions,provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission(HPC)Approving all Application for Major Development(Conceptual) and a Variance from the Residential Design Standards for 114 Neale Avenue,Lot 1 of the 114 Neale/ 17 Queen Street Historic Landmark Lot Split,City and Townsite of Aspen,Colorado(Resolution No. 29, Series of 2006)dated October 25,2006, and recorded March 15,2007,as Reception No. 535455. 16.Terins,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission(HPC)Approving all Application for Major Development(Final)for 114 Neale Avenue,Lot 1 of the 114 Neale/ 17 Queen Street Historic Landmark Lot Split,City and Townsitc of Aspen,Colorado(Resolution No. 17,Series of 2007)dated February 28,2007,and recorded November 11,2011, as Reception No. 584275. The Owner's policy to be issued hereunder will contain, in addition to the items set forth in Schedule B - Section 2, the following items: (1) the mortgage, if any, required under Schedule B - Section 1, item (c); (2) unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, water rights, claims or title to water; (3)any and all unpaid taxes,assessments and unredeemed tax sales. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulation 3-5-1, Section 7,Paragraph G requires that every title insurance company shall be responsible to the proposed insured(s) subject to the terms and conditions of the title insurance commitment, other than the effective date of the title insurance commitment, for all matters which appear of record prior to the lime of recording whenever the title insurance company, or its agent,conducts the closing and settlement service that is in conjunction Nvith its issuance of an owners policy of title insurance and is responsible for the recording and filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed. Note: Exception 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of this Commitment may be deleted from the policy(s) to be issued hereunder upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this Commitment must be a single family residence,which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials may have been furnished by mechanics or materialmen for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment Nvithin the past 13 months. C. ATGF must receive the appropriate affidavit(s) indemnif},ing ATGF against mechanic's and material men's lions not filed. D. Any deviations from conditions A through C above is subject to such additional requirements or information as ATGF may deem necessary,or,at its option, ATGF may refuse to delete the exception. Note: The following disclosures are hereby made pursuant to SC.R.S. 10-11-122 i. The subject property may be located in a special taxing district ii. A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each tax jurisdiction sliall be-obtained from the county treasurer of the county treasurer's authorized agent iii. Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the board of county commissioners, the county clerk and recorder or the county assessor. Note: if there is recorded evidence that one or more mineral estates has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate of the subject property described in Schedule A of this Commitment, there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all of the ownership interest in oil, gas or other minerals or geothermal energy in the subject property. Such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the surface of the subject property without the surface owner's permission. Copyright 2006-21109 American Land 1 isle A.zuriatiun. All dght.tcsene& f he use ui this Funu is restncral to AL FA licensee:anJ,It.TA members in gu<.+J standing a,of the FORUM PHI r rorol x°,v.,s,E:femlTro.,:as ER�eTE�wI.IEEa,aEE 114 NEALE Don 8 Mn Short - k �� f 14 Neale Avenue - __ � �`� Aspen,Cofo,atlo 81811 M55 L W s'-"�V�(} •Ya k wawN j CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR 1 1 f __ qq I � STRUCTU 1 Eve . «OR 1 t a@dmw.m i tl. (s,a)etJ�aoe t --- - f z TI S ,- 11 �• f, e .,. J rEau r, I - J !fir j'+ S E P 18 2013 01 Z-303 moaosEOUNOSravEw,rf f'=' LANDSCAPE PLAN 'WZ�f M E;g APR 5 zai3 :•\ CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY OEVE OPMENT \ CL o FORUM PHI p, uj 2104 .. 1 eeDe"C"bw 8161, Lu ' F.ry1(plN<t5TF:166�TN6566 T _ 114 NEALE 0"n&Aen Sh.4 c, X114 Gob od"81811 - KING STREET O ' - - cvoEVFO�srwa veL�x�TiT, - - °"�'oseoc _ pis;«ffTROw {�-Cb VRUr S tea.f , \ CONSULTANTS � 8URVEVOR 1 �� _ GN, �FI.sEMF1+r z,�cibmsbes, eNa a + ``,:'°'°"ems."° N OEOTECH � FRO I � `f•,• t ole.ro�at�sp'av+.lcoetbw (cTgaasmee STRUCTURAL W 1 J7jI i I _ �,' i SSNSN.VeaISiEEe iomisv- 1 CONTRACTOR 1 1 � Y. , \ FOS®oR1vEV54v t,. � •�rf- Toxe 0 - l vM er. EIH i I 1. Tf covYplGNr roRUx cla.uC trrcE � SHEETTITLE (� ToaoulN A0.01 b1TE Ub• Tu• SITE PLAN aaE"Eb�� FORUM PHI - I� s waw wweeo H—MOUST mal:m„s..a sti,roa�as i .O”—W,` 114 NEALE - „a Neala Ava,ue vns -- -- aavan.COMaco e,s„ I�cross �,w A +yam sw�,a cowls � 5�x 6 r consuurnnTs SvnvEYOR VvIL ryralnle- 4 _— _.. I•.�A`.J� F '� '� \ del^i9.w I t WCHANI1 L mucluE- u + CONTRACTOR + E P 13 1013 N SHEET TITI E Z-303X ExrsTmcuuwscesE alw+ 10 - �° LANDSCAPE PLAN 'lJIrLJ 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. ❑ Select plant and tree material according to its mature size, to allow for the long-term impact of mature growth. ❑ Reserve the use of exotic plants to small areas for accent. )dl Do not cover grassy areas with gravel,rock or paving materials. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. In general,a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street(per the Residential Design Standards). The size of a lightwell should be minimized. ❑ A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 14.15 Minimize the visual impacts of mechanical equipment as seen from the public way. Mechanical equipment may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. ❑ Mechanical equipment or vents on a roof must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. Screen ground-mounted units with fences, stone walls or hedges. ❑ A window air conditioning unit may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. ❑ Use low-profile mechanical units on rooftops so they will not be visible from the street or alley. Also minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Use smaller satellite dishes and mount them low to the ground and away from front yards, significant building facades or highly visible roof planes. ❑ Paint telecommunications and mechanical equipment in muted colors that will minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds. 14.23 Parking areas should not be visually obtrusive. ,1K Large parking areas should be screened from view from the street. ❑ Divide large parking lots with planting areas. (Large parking areas are those with more than five cars.) ❑ Consider using a fence,hedge or other appropriate landscape feature. ❑ Automobile headlight illumination from parking areas should be screened from adjacent lots and the street. CITY OF ASPEN DIPS No LIMENT NO. 0-159 ELEV. -7900.07' VECINITY MAP 0 0 END OF CURB 'o* HERRON PARK NOTICE.—1.TO LAW—ROUT——­ TH'.FLAT 11"TIIIN maze r5 WED�YW APT M—T MIS MT. �Y Tl.TRW TEN E FROM THE IT ——11 IlTI"­ IF I S.1, I. b F IIQT W�SY­W­ W 'I- Yy lo� lll� 4v CP O 4v CITY OF ASPEN OPS MONUMENT NO, 4 LOT 2 APR 5 2013 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 3"DIA. B.L.M. BRASS CAP E.A.T. 11 20.- 30W ❑ UTILITY BOX z' K MANHOLE QJ FENCE UTILITY POLE DRAIN 1••10• a WATER VALVE 30%AND OVER iiiiiEmllm ♦ SURVEY CONTROL 0 10 20 IRE HYDRANT El, TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: IITKIN C T W TILE, INC. DATED: 2002 CASE NO. PCT17029L FOUND RED 25047, FLUSH WITH GRADE TREE CALIPER IN INCHES IF-CO.IFER,D-DECIDUO.l, DI.-DRIll-IME1 SEE LAYER 10 ELEVATIONS BASED ON THE BENCHMARK AT THE SOUTHWEST 7'0 14'DL CORNER OF THE COURTHOUSE LAWN, ELEVATION: 7906.67, CITY WS MONUMENT Q 159 WALK THIS PROPERTY 15 SITUATED IN ZONE-X' (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PREPARED BY iA., FOR PITK!N COUNTY COLORADO, COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 08091..C.. EFFECT VE 12'D DATE. JUNE 4, 1987 Ir THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD QQS.41 AREA AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, PROJECT NUMBER 1963, FIGURE ES-15. WATER AND SEWER LOCATED IN WEAL AND KING STREET ALL OTHER UTILITIES IN KING STREET CITY OF ASPEN DIPS No LIMENT NO. 0-159 ELEV. -7900.07' VECINITY MAP 0 0 END OF CURB 'o* HERRON PARK NOTICE.—1.TO LAW—ROUT——­ TH'.FLAT 11"TIIIN maze r5 WED�YW APT M—T MIS MT. �Y Tl.TRW TEN E FROM THE IT ——11 IlTI"­ IF I S.1, I. b F IIQT W�SY­W­ W 'I- Yy lo� lll� 4v CP O 4v CITY OF ASPEN OPS MONUMENT NO, 4 LOT 2 APR 5 2013 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 7 DL 7-F L 0 6 DO SO 0.136 ACRES POND STONE PAT ENCROAC4F O'D 6'D 0 7'DL 7'D DRIVE ENCROACHES i 7'D 10 DL PARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT FLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STARE OF COLORADO. CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIONED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING AND IS AOCURAit HOIN, AND THERE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE A' D ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF DID. SGUM BOUNDARY LIFE EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS EC CON LIC75. ENCR.ACjElENTS, T OF*AY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR kNdw TO EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH TH NO ABOVE6ROUND APPURTERA 4 SURVEYOR ARCPEXCAMDTDODCUME IT OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED 0 THE THIS SURVEY 18 VOID LIN EBB WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. SURVEY PRECISION IS LESS THAN 1:15'000 DATED:_ JOHN M.HOWORTH P.L.S. 25047 ❑ PAVED DRIVE IMPROVEMENT / TOPOGRAPHIC PAVED DRIVE SURVEY OF NO.5 RE-BAN LOT 'ALA''=,S'THE SUBDIVISION IVISION EXEMPTION PLAT 0 114 MERLE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT I IT 1�, I Plat thor—f re—dod May 29, 1998 1,Fiat Book 45 at P.S. 1t. ACCESS EASEMENT CITY OF ASPEN PUT BOOK 13 P TK N COUNTY AT PAGE 35 STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING: 0.138 ACRES -/-, 6,001 50 FT PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 51811 PHONE/FAX(970) 925-3816 DATE JOB 04/12 2212. 4t t OP z' K El, 4*D L GDR A VrL COW. 7'0 14'DL WALK 12'D B.L.M. TEE Ir QQS.41 X. UTILITIES GRAVEL HOUSE 4:.F N\ DRIVE S'•F.L 1. HISTORIC OVERLAY PARCEL 5 DL OF THE TRETTIN PROPERTY RECEPTION. NO 334163 AREA 3,543 S.F. 10 FOOT WIDE DITCH EASEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE I 4%r Vp DL DRIVE 7 DL 7-F L 0 6 DO SO 0.136 ACRES POND STONE PAT ENCROAC4F O'D 6'D 0 7'DL 7'D DRIVE ENCROACHES i 7'D 10 DL PARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT FLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STARE OF COLORADO. CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIONED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING AND IS AOCURAit HOIN, AND THERE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE A' D ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF DID. SGUM BOUNDARY LIFE EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS EC CON LIC75. ENCR.ACjElENTS, T OF*AY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR kNdw TO EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH TH NO ABOVE6ROUND APPURTERA 4 SURVEYOR ARCPEXCAMDTDODCUME IT OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED 0 THE THIS SURVEY 18 VOID LIN EBB WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. SURVEY PRECISION IS LESS THAN 1:15'000 DATED:_ JOHN M.HOWORTH P.L.S. 25047 ❑ PAVED DRIVE IMPROVEMENT / TOPOGRAPHIC PAVED DRIVE SURVEY OF NO.5 RE-BAN LOT 'ALA''=,S'THE SUBDIVISION IVISION EXEMPTION PLAT 0 114 MERLE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT I IT 1�, I Plat thor—f re—dod May 29, 1998 1,Fiat Book 45 at P.S. 1t. ACCESS EASEMENT CITY OF ASPEN PUT BOOK 13 P TK N COUNTY AT PAGE 35 STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING: 0.138 ACRES -/-, 6,001 50 FT PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 51811 PHONE/FAX(970) 925-3816 DATE JOB 04/12 2212. APR 5 2013 COMMUNITY 1 Lf[YCtOPMGtV± CL •pppb a FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 [T Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:(970)279-4157 F:(866)770.5585 cl' N-z g 114 NEALE U Don&Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue KING STREET Aspen,Colorado 81611 EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT w\\ww PROPOSED CON KING STREET R.O.W. w CRETE WALK E ERIST{NG EXISTIN t r LIGHT UTILITIES .- A n1.(TO BE i.•� TO B - i .RELOCATED �_. \_. k7Sr '.. ) SURIE© CONSULTANTS 1a DF,DITCH EASEMENT SURVEYOR \ "- ,�r•1" ALGNG CENTERLINE Aspen Survey Engineers,Ix. 210 South Galena Street Aspen,CO 81611 925-3616 aspensurveyors®gil.com w EXISTING CULVERTED DITCH ma _ ww TO REMAIN m CIVIL i y..r *"•�ww - Roaring Fork Engineering w aw w� PO BOX 1117 Carbondale,CO 81623 970 948-7474 �{ ,`PROPOSED \ richardg®deng.org PARKING max.a , wwww GEOTECH I PROPO ED HP Geotech FE „�-,'�` { 5020 County Road 154 Glemnood Springs,CO 81601 (970)945.7988 hpgeoghpgeotech.com I I STRUCTURAL I Evolve Structural Design Lt1 I I I I 65 N 4th Street,STE 5 Z I I I Carbondale,GO 81623 (970)618-7708 I $ r i I sara@c ohestruct.com Q I o I ( CONTRACTOR TBD I I 1\ -------- LU p I ( I ��•, PROPOSED DRIVEWAY asr2013 UATEOFRJBL1- PROPOSED FIREPIT \\�% PROPOSED V A\ FENCE \ SD 415/13 HPC FINAL REVIEW \ SD 1/9113 HPC CONCEPT.REV. PROPOSED Y- LANDSCAPE PROJECT NO: 1211 ( STAIRS \\ - DRAWN BY: EAH I' PROPOSED —"— ��� \. r. COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC BOULDER WALL _ ,. \. I * SETBACKS,TYP EXISTING\ —— — — _ 1 PUMP "'—' -� SHEETTITLE HOUSE EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN A0.01 SITE PLAN 1/8° = 111" SITE PLAN • • 013 • CITY OF ASPEN • FORUM PHI it117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen Coloredo 81611 P:(970)279.4157 F'(866)770-5585 U 114 NEALE Don&Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen,Colorado 81611 - -- O WALL MOUNT FIXTURE -- RECESSED STEP FIXTURE CONSULTANTS LINEAR STRIP FIXTURE SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 South Galena Street _ — Aspen,CO 81611 (970)925-3816 aspensur oyors®gmail.com CIVIL -. Roaring Fork Engineering PO BOX 1117 Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)948.7474 I richardg @dang.org GEOTECH HP Ge-tach 0 5020 County Road 154 Glemwod Springs,CO 81601 ( '____ (970)945.7988 hpgeo @hpgeotech.cam I STRUCTURAL ( I ( &otae Structural Design I I I 65 N 4th Street,STE 5 Carbondale,CO 01623 (970)618-7708 I ❑ I sar @Q DNestruct.com I CONTRACTOR TBD l arsnnrx DATE Or nmitcenos 1\ I \ �A 1 \ SO 415/13 HPC FINAL REVIEW - ��^" SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT.REV. \ PROJECT NO: 1211 DRAWN BY EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC ._..- . . \ SHEET TITLE AO.02 LIGHTING PLAN 1 18" = 1'-0" LIGHTING PLAN RECEIVED APR 5 2013 LU Z CITY OF ASPEN • o ° COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Cobrado 81611 P:(970)2794157 F(866)7705585 � z 114 NEALE Don&Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen,Colorado 81611 rl , EXISTING SHRUB 1 11 11 • EXISTING CONIFER TREE CONSULTANTS EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. —,� PROPOSED BOULDER WALL 210 South Galena Street Aspen,CO 81611 PROPOSED PAVERS (970)925-3816 _ — aspensurveyors�gmail.com PLANTED AREA CIVIL GREEN ROOF Roaring Fork Engineering PO BOX 1117 PERVIOUS PAVING Carbondale,CO 81623 (9701 948-7474 GRAVEL PATIOIPARMING richardg®rteng.org I - GEOTECH _.I.. —^\ HP Geotech ---'— \\ 502 Road 154 t' \ Glenvood Springs,CO 81601 t---- ----n \ 1 (970)945-7986 hpgeo @hpgeotech.wm STRUCTURAL Evoke Stmctura Design 65 N 4th Street,STE 5 Carbondale,CO 81623 - j I (970)618-7708 I I sara®evotvestruct.com I CONTRACTOR TBD I I R _ I I 1 1\ arsrsota ore or:rueLwnou \ \1 \1 aav \ \y \ \\ SD 415M3 HPC FlNAL REVIEW \\ SO 119M3 HPC CONCEPT.REV. I \ i — PROJECT NO: 1211 \ 1 I � DRAWN BY: EAH COPYRIGHT FORUMPHI,LLC SHEET TITLE A0.03 LANDSCAPE PLAN 118" _ "-o" LANDSCAPE PLAN as ZLLJ Uj a� O CITY c), • �> COMMUNITY I)Evt, �T FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 CL- �-!\ Aspen,Colorado 81611 J ¢ I ( \ ` P:(970)279.4157 F:(866)7705585 \ 114 NEALE A Don&Ann Short / 114 Neale Avenue Aspen,Colorado 61611 I o OE --------------------- \ BATH 004 STEAM SAUNA BEDJOOM 09 1\ CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR GYM Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 South Galena Street ry CO 81611 NTH s. (970)(970)925-3816 orD aspensurveyors@gmaiLcom CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO BOX 1117 on Carbdae,CO 81623 (970)948-7474 ❑ �A a 1 .� richardg@rfeng.org 14 a GEOTECH �W HP Geotech ti \ 5020 County Road 154 I Genvood Springs,CO 81601 LAUNDRY HALL \ h hpge @hpg 945-7988 DDa /,1a hpgeo�hpgeotech.com STRUCTURAL 1 Evolve Structural Design 0---- -—-—-—-—-— ----- '—' .pry '—'--- - \\ Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)618.7708 sam@Q olvestruct.com i BATH CONTRACTOR TBD 10 i MEDIA 005 \ 45I2D10 GATE OE ft1atIGTrON MECH ` BUNKROOM F 011 \ 006 ' i SD 4/5/13 HPC FINAL REVIEW � SD 1/9113 HPC CONCEPT.REV. �./ -- ----------------i------ I - a \ PROJECT NO 1211 \ DRAWN BY EAH \ ,\ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LUC 6 SHEET TITLE � � b A1 .01 SUBGRADE 1/4" = 1".. FLOOR PLANS RECEIVED . * / UJ C3 CITY 2013 CITY OE ASPEN 0 ,... ' T 6 \ C( MMITY DEVELOPMENT FORUM PHI \ 117 So th at do 81611 202 Q 4^ \ P:(970)279.4157 F:(866)7705585 \ ♦ 114 NEALE A /- Don&Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen,Colorado 8 611 �}------------------- - \ ✓ I L WINE ROOM 11Ifi 22 +\ r `\ 1 ❑ 9,J400M CONSULTANTS LNING Aspe Surveey Engine—,Inc. 210 South Galena Street Aspen, 5.81611 (B70)925.3816 aspensurveyorsggmail.com Roaring Fork Engineering PO BOX 1117 Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)948-7474 BED richardg @rfeng.org \ a GEOTECH 4 20. HP Geotech 5020 County Road 154 Glenw d Springs,CO 81601 i (970)945-7988 hp9eo@hpgeotech.com STRUCTURAL Evolve Structural Design 65 N 4th Street,STE 5 Ba------------ '—'— ------------ --'--- Carbondale,CO 81623 i �=4 BATH (970)618-7708 w sara@evoHestrud.com DOG WASH CONTRACTOR TBD ,, GARAGE \ 100 \ 4512012 GATE OF FUBLVATfON \ BEDROOM b F ' 4, z, z \ n rSD 4/5113 HPC FINAL REVIEW 1 1/9113 HPC CONCEPT.REV. PROJECT DRAWN BY O EAH ✓� 1\ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC A d A\ 6 SHEET TITLE � � b A1 .02 LOWER LEVEL 114" = 1`9' FLOOR PLANS i RECEIVED • APR 5 2013 CD Q CITY OF ASPEN • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FORUM PHI _ T T T T 6 \`\ T I I 117 South at do 81611 202 0 \ z P:(970)279-4157 F:(866)7705585 I I I I A I / 114 NEALE / f Don&Ann Short \ 114 Neale Avenue s Aspen,Colorado 81611 I I I I s R4 � PWDR --—-—--- — 1 �---—- —- — —'— --- -- — -- — — I li; \ -_—____ CONSULTANTS I Iii I SURVEYOR \ I I I ENTRY j KITCHEN \ AE,en Surve En ineers,Inc. nut 210 South Ga lena Street \ - Aspen,CO 81611 97 925-3816 aspensurvayors@gmaitcom III I - CIVIL I I � Roaring Fork Engineering PO BOX 1117 III I \ Carbondale,CO 81623 \e: c r(970)94&7474 ic rfeng .org --_—_--- - -_—_— ------ GEOTECH DINING, \. HPGeotech I s 5020 County Road 154 d III yA, Glenwood Springs,CO 81601 a (970)945.7988 III 2 I hpgeD@hpgeotech.com °w I STRUCTURAL G Evolve Structure Design OB -------------- -_—_— b ------ ._.,._.z5 Caondal.,CC 81623 I I (870)618-7708 'fu sam@evoNestruct.com I I MSTR�BATH COCNTRACTOR TB I I I I I /5/3013 DATE OF NBLSGT[ON I I I I I S. MASTER BEDROOM I I I ms - iz f U --`---------- I----- I------ — / SD 4/5/13 HPC FINAL REVIEW 13 \ SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT.REV. I I I I fs / fa PROJECT NO: 1211 \ \ DRAWN BY: EAH '.. I I I - �\ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC 4 ( A\ b SHEET TITLE s A1 .03 MAIN LEVEL 1/4" = P-0" FLOOR PLANS Y E • Lu APR 2013 • q CITY OF ,ASPEN • T \ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR• a_ UM PHI LU CL' 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 I \ Aspen,Colorado 81611 2 \ P:(970)279-4157 F:(866)7705585 cj 114 NEALE / Don&Ann Short I 114 Neale Avenue \ •-�1`. NEW METALROOF Aspen,Colorado 81611 (D— ----- ----- II EXISTING_y, I SLOPE \ II I GREEN ROOF \ i. \ j \ ) EXISTING SHAKE SHNIGLE ROOFf 1 &CHIMNEY TO REMAIN CONSULTANTS II I I z I SURVEYOR EXISTING METAL ROOF I \ TO REMAIN I ( p I Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. I EXISTING rn I GREEN ROOF 210 South Galena Street \ Aspen,GO 61611 �—SLOPE I ' i (970)925-3816 I \ O Z I aspensurveyors®gmaiLcom I w I i" o I - CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering \\ PO BOX 1117 Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)948.7474 richardg rfeng.org --------------- li NEwMETALROOF GEOTECH \, HP Geotech 5020 County Road 154 Glenv d Springs,CO 81601 I EXISTING—� \r (970)945-7988 LOPE \;\\ hpgeo@hpgeotech.com STRUCTURAL EvoNe Structural Street, Design 1-------- --------- \ \ 65 N 4th Stt.STE 5 Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)618-7708 sam@@ olvestmct.com I \\\\ \\ CONTRACTOR \'\�. \1\ X5/2M -E-BLIGTIM GREEN ROOF \ SO 4/5113 HPC FINAL REVIEW SO 119113 HPC CONCEPT.REV. I \ PROJECT NO: 1211 DRAWN SY: EAH `\ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC i a a a\ b b SHEET TITLE s 2 3 4 A1 .04 ROOF PLAN 1/4" _ 1'-0" ROOF PLAN i RECEWED � w 11 ' APR 5 ��13 0— N �LSJ j CITY OF ASPEN ,•wenlex .-� � 1 e C %HTeW /� W i r� P 3 p y FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 - Aspen,Colorado 6)77 1 P:(970)279.4157 F:(866)7705585 f� 114 NEALE Don&Ann Short STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF - - Exlsnuo METaLROOF 114 Neale Avenue 19r-0' mr-0' I TO REMPM Aspen,Colorado 81611 �T.o.PUTE G ADwnoN T.o.PLATE G ADDITION - - F. EXISTING CLAPBOARD SIDING TO REMAIN 5 RAIN SCREEN sIDINO _ r _ NEW CLAPBOARD SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING _ _—_ __—_____— - ___—_—_—__-__F—T.O PLV®ALUNLEVEL ___-—___—_____ T.O.PLY 8 ADDITION 98'M 12' --------------- T.O.PLY GADDITION—+—-—-— —- CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 South Galena Street Aspen,CO 81611 (970)925-3816 aspensuweyors@gmaii.com CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO BOX 1117 Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)948-7474 2.1 NORTH 114" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" richardg @rfeng.org GEOTECH HP Geotech 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs,CO 61601 (970)945-7988 hpgeo @hpgeotech.com STRUCTURAL Evolve Structural Design 65 N 4th Street,Sf E 5 Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)618-7708 1+e-1112' sam@@ olvestruct.com HT a EXISTING RIDGE TOI REMAIN�MNEY CONTRACTOR TBD W.M.ROOF TO REMAIN - X5Itp10 DATE OF PUN.T.71ON 101" _______________ T.O.PLATE G EXISTING ROOF—{ I r EXI6TMG CLAPBDARD 6DINp TO REMAIN EXSTINGMSTORILWINDOWS_ + TO REMAIN EXISTING DECORATED COLUMNS -- -TO REMAIN V41.1 HPC FINAL REVIEW HPC CONCEPT,REV. GLA59 GUARD t Otl-0' ___—_—_—___ _...�_ _ —_.__—_ _._._ _ ____— —_ T.O.RG MAIN LEVEL - PROJECT NO EAH _ - _—_____—_—_ T.C.—)— PLY G AoolnoN DRAWN BY,. EAH BDARD FORM CONCRETE -- ---, COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE A2.01 1 WEST 114" = 1'-0" ELEVATIONS RECEIVED APR 2 013 • CITY OF ASPEN • 5 v CGW31�fU1-`;'r'Zffi OPh ENT FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 I �J 2 � _ P:(970)279 4157 F:(866)7705585 Q � � U 114 NEALE v � STANOINO 6EAMMETAL ROOF STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Don&Ann Short j 114 Neale Avenue —-—-—-—-—- i Aspen,Colorado 81611 TO PLATE•ASTER MASTER To R STING A CLAPBOARD SIDING _ ❑ ❑ To REMAIN - SUDINO WOCD SCREEN EXISTING HSTORIC WINDOWS TO REMAIN V laam• _ GLASS GIMRo T,O.PLY®MAIN LEVEL—{—_ _—_ _—_ _—._�..._, _ _—__ 9I-B 12• 9a•B 12' - ---—-—-—- — T.O.PLY®MASTER - T.O.-+ PLY @MASTER . .. _. -..... _._ - ... -.... - -.. —BOARD FOR.—RETE -._.. _. BOARD FORM CONCRETE BOARD FORM CONCRETE CONSULTANTS ® ® \ C O OO SURVEYOR -- Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 South Galena Street Aspen,CO 81611 (970)925-3816 BB"A 12• �-_—-—-—-—-—_ _—_ _—_ -—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—I—T.O.PLY LOWER LEVEL -—-—-+T.O.PLY LOWER LEVEL aepansurvayors®gmall.com T.D.PLY®LOWER LEV EL CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO BOX 1117 Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)948-7474 4 SOUTH 1/4" = 1'-0" 4.1 SOUTH V4" = 1'-0" richardg @deng.org GEOTECH HP Geotech 5020 County Road 154 Glemeood Springs,CO 81601 (970)945-7968 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com STRUCTURAL Evolve Structural Design 65 N 4th Street,STE 5 Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)61&7708 sam@wolvestructcom CONTRACTOR - TBD HB21113 GATE OF M1BIlGTION STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF _- STAN DINGSEAMMETALROOF T.O.PLATE®MASTER�- _._ �T.O,PLATE®ADDITION SLICING WOOD SCREEN RAIN SCREEN SIDING SO 415113 HPC FINAL REVIEW RAIN SCREEN SIDING ----- ---- -" - - -- SD 119113 HPC CONCEPT.REV. 9 8 __ ... ._.":_._' ___—_—_—_—_—_ loam• +T.D.PLY.ADDITION PROJECT NO 1211 112"� PLY ADDITION —- DRAWN BY EAH BOARD FORM CONCRETE _. _. COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE A2.02 3 EAST 1/4" = 141 ELEVATIONS 1 Y t RECHVED 0 APR 5 2.0,113 c:) UJI ru ;,w CITY OF ASPEN ' FORUM PHI rL 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen.Colorado 81611 P:(970)279-41577 F:(665)7705585 �t 114 NEALE Don&Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen,Colorado 81611 115-1 MT EXiS.QLSTNG RIDGE 'T" _—___—_________ —_______—_—_+T.O•PLATE QISTNG ROOF T.O.PLATE Q QNnNG ROOD CONSULTANTS ❑ SURVEYOR Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 South Galena Street Aspen CO 81611 I �� (970)925-3816 J aspenwrveyors�gmail.com Ba-o CIVIL _— -—-—-—-—-—-—- T.O.PLY 0 MAIN LEVEL Roaring Fork Engineering -- - PO BOX 1197 Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)948-7474 richardg®rfang.org GEOTECH HP Geotech 5020 County Road 154 GARAGE FAMILYROOM Gleneood Springs,CO 81601 1B6 101 (970)945-7988 hpgeo @hpgeotech.com STRUCTURAL 71 \A 1 Evolve Structural Design ee'-a 1rz" —_____.}._ Carbondal-Street,CO 816 3 88'A irz" T.O.PLY®LOWER LEVEL�- T.O.PLY C LOWER LEVEL (970)618-7708 sera @e okNestruct.com CONTRACTOR TBD MEINA. GYM SAUNA w9 BB2 Boa M52013 DATE OF PUBLICATION 7T-11" ___ ___ _ _ —_ —_____ 7r-1- T.O.PLY @ SUBGRADE—{ T.O.PLY Q SUBGRAOE 71-10" 7 B' SD 415113 HPC FINAL REVIEW T.O.SLABQCRAWLSPACE—I-—-—-—-—-—-— -------------I—T.O.SLABOCRAVYL SPACE RE STRUCTURAL RE STRUCTURAL 50 119113 HPC CONCEPT,REV. A SECTION 114" = 1'-0" PROJECT NO: 1211 DRAWN BY: EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE A3.01 SECTIONS I • • RECEIVED • li:'/ J APR 5 20:3 • Lift L CITY OF ASPEN • C A 'Y DEVELONIENT • FORUM PHI 117 Astpen,Spring Colo Colorado Street, 816112 P:(970)279-4157 F:(866)7705585 U 114 NEALE Don&Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen,Colorado 81611 104A• _—_ --------------- _----__—_—_ T.O.PIATE®E%ISTNGftOOF—� —tmw —-—-—_—- • CONSULTANTS 1 7 PLATE•ADOmON SURVEYOR _--- - Aspen Survey Engineers,Inc. 210 South Galena Street Aspen,CO 81611 (970)925-3816 aspensurveyors@gr il.com CIVIL ® Roaring Fork Engineering T.O.PLY -1.LEVEL �— 1n' PO BOX 1117 T...-—- +.O,PLY•ADDmON Carbondale,CO 81623 (970)948-7474 richardg@rfeng.org GEOTECH HP Geotech 5020 County Road 154 ❑ LIVING GARAGE GlenvAood Springs,CO 61601 tot 10. (970)945-7988 hpgeo®hpgeotech.com STRUCTURAL Evolve Structural Design 65 N 4th esi tn• Carbondale,eCO 81623 eE' 1LY T.O.PLY®LOWER LEVEL�--—-—-—-—- T.O.PLY•LOWER LEVEL (970)618.7798 saa@evoWestrud.com CONTRACTOR TBD GYM DB: MSnpi] DATEOFPUBLICli I T 7'•11" _________ _ ----_-----_ 7T-11- T.O.CONC•SUBGRADE�- T.O.CONC•SUBGMpE n'-to• -— — — — SD 4/5/13 HPC FINAL REVIEW T.O.SLAB®CRAWL SPACE—{-—-—-—-—- Tt'-1S' RE STRUCTURAL —-—�T.O.SLAB•CM WL SPACE RE STRUCTURAL SD 119113 HPC CONCEPT.REV. A SECTION 114" = 1'-0" PROJECT NO: 1211 DRAWN BY. EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC S H E ET TITLE A3.02 SECTIONS rw n HlUV n-I B « Yd Hv 4ACH�dY n f♦ �i}LIiN uiM�1�ultVN'� 1' A", iWAIJ<* NT.:_q NY f N_3 D ,M4 y N kA�iyy C1/-I�+'S1+e;•N'14W'1`�07 Glfid`NT)O'l-`iili WJ ZtAHT3VW nOtLVA�'g nil`>O'"'VEQb7�St"K'q:Sj1-fY1$M.:y2tt+`JYI���4t1 'GM} ,V�.��SMiIIMI itCr:id l+�A�k 011iryN�ASeefM P"J". —3 VV 111-t 116 -I:tt J—y0?1fflrlwp 7G Vl11 v SEI.L j,C 1`F/ r�!§t` '1 rl`,j 1.II'1{'.,r \a}.;J�,'y' /,8 J11I+6 t".CV=-txn 3inv3.4'"�W.1n 2+7)oM 1•=oTf3N3^V 3M�8b 111087'%3^NYK_'c1YnA��'.21�5 All ar' aml III.-,NMY�'4.3''v ST731TT 55='3�c�G�i `NI+`+`*3 ' V:R1:143-ilY['US IIIV Villl—3!LL Q1.5I^ANr lu1M N1.6s.2—N' Abut}(111i(+ Z.,�J—'-J-N�tiT.rr y.y�ML'-+.G?a'9tif tr 3�nf+N O"9socr,'»d 4 ilL nd"I4+V,430.1 Cl4?ICM-I. b 1�'S,?V�i F+UJ V'GN$i Nl ge 3-3,111}4%Sle7+A''iNsv S'1`.'P#3,r QN}P'V ?f!.1,f:Q''Alill:)4,1N1.1'.IX?I�,tLL l NI Vi Nl—WN'q.'1Sb'4. 17?4U Yk. J. ?r,'S'AQ 2f AOIA 9H., ivYt. ."Q+p MC+p 1'"N 5?l:/'; #1.-.�'d-in 4l 1�3 EQIINMG'A L MMIMJ'313 ITI;3L9b 6's' AiaH. Ni Y V',nJ qdH 1 0', Ad 1. IA 1"I' l 353:'�a UNY "Ith Nisrn'. j 44n ,)N,ISIX3 v n!1, Iwla' ,P l: yy eA00'wS+'lea l'..-UNiOe,k;Nl. - Vab cn". >li3&} C)1. NIN: I)MV1011*1 b3mSW N)'N IW CN 1341111.11;73Y# Yk ,hM 1. 'YU S31'3k'A:INO i>• 'IdVJ IvY k %a N kd,V?r1 a 1, )NV SNA"JOOV`v:,. `a1SN0.N:3s1 G 3NV ANf,; i1VM3Q 4;;3't JV .`ie. lod!9411 .0 410)id Yt>t NiYNYI')`lU Ok,AI J': 11 Nil 3N'3,'}NVI`I;" bll .. i ,1N NO IALIe1bV MAss* R Mf NI IY 30 S2b4 iat 1 fi3 Y1N 3ui HO { ', ill 31igOW I'D AN31t3♦C?'+1 i'O9/'L 'W: A I NVN:IN 4 ON f' Y.'VN3U l Oil. falV)41a;N 3#Ait oalw 3d33N 1�H•1'ld L9 NdgI1 A3 90.III I Ati(S h+i d AP Nil Ae v1 034 9 S N%NV MAN A!331115 v Y.aa) l,v k r ,"i NUN. AA 11YNL N3NV{113A`i0 3dr ff19:10 341 $I( kV 1} ,E :: '+7 YHI N G, Sn ' 3:2NYNOONI 31i" NOa MNti1"In 3rIN N{ q 3'iRT W WI /Ai 1 Ad Qi V414 + ! °� lgpN1'I�NY e,�3dba.z iM,L 17A3Nr a O31 110 };BSI NA 3Y•Y5 IN, 3T:,'A A Nltfs')%x. U V k iA 3 n1 N3N39V9 Nte lddY-rs 9uu �` i+3reYS .. n.I 3011 INXII SI(? 1NNfM4S'o-, 3NI NO{�+INYY 7d 3M✓OVGdNO jTY,dn.dgtLaAak NiLON��tlY UNV 391 wj 43d9Y 3s' 64 0 l E Al VH1 O tNVO 1N 1!N-1 300 b 9SI (kHY N3d4V^Mil H Oil V1a0 N 1 UI LNV i4Nf.d N ]3N1 AU U3 3 0fN3 NO 091M'3NY N3N l✓B13 39 AVW 1VA006-V , 1 W9N,3O 11A3?7?I i i t NL 3;t t b dS3H VNd i All N3,51 30 3J 4,)311 10n4IN V k 'BN :` L Sri'li! 319 AV 3AONV fit 73NN}}Ht YAONd NN JNION{U NO YMNOdN V 1H,+{,YV�Y_r 9 a' ") 011 001 N3 Hld t'. LYn.I'p ON ly 1mw IjA.11N?3 nN OOVONN 3W 3S' LA♦tVONiWif IA;dI - 1)4'--d; ' INY"f N3.I.V 3r1 RN''1 ..9P d1VJ1IddV tS!NNO NNOJ 7Vtlf, .,a0 NO JW3NdtY�%490 i "l S'I"N N3 SV }l, is SMtIr S-A02.{ 1HYA1 l3N^SW 01 1J'a`Nils cVNYNtINV .J9.tl 3NYP�Y 5:b 111d'7WM M1yMMYN�4�UMIMf!1744 tML hs .n .n Nek r�I � -u. •; 1301!110 A1N9N.I�r+F9 3hr1 110 V1W dOC i N?1333 aNWIWO 5t6'4 ONY IOM 5.•x 1..s' / Al, I{ 'JL, (131NYN0,1, SI)NO10 r4iiv NVI-JA 1Wii 3NY{NI.+'iWS V MOi tV kN410r1 jFll &li to v4N1 .a' N1NI1a}�+ 3NY1Ws Kri 3N I1 N1mM a,ltlyq+.l-as',-Ai 3nb rNa NVtl 3iWM4 "iV �� Oi I"I.NYN vs 03U11103N 14V,1XophliaM V 101 ON LV'F11 N3atii0 VNl ItN7 �w AN '(+ - NN103 S 03131 AONd 139N;3pIY1NriS 001 4Y JU t )NNd A Itl1H kfW3 3N1 yaNVd °Jf,. µS v OrFV 1323 3MVfd);kOO 4 yO T3313YN.t:tlVH,i7HW 3Na1 1's1:ailVd 31N0 OtN1 ,V �90;t 6 3s' i9VHM FlN3dl}1}d 11{L 9Nq!,k:}fiq�N Y3N"VIII.,I3HVJl ladyy 11Y ONV.INV, I N(!00',}V HLN)ANII$Yf 1Q'i H,"i YO iW 9TM#{4i 9hf N3,'.11310 ON NOZ A l µSNOI 13111 Y VYINVA 401 1 01/V-t4dV1 iY ft,,U,, 1,101 VWN 1,10,"1 •`lam�' at`INd Vil11l Nil:NO 331:INVAO,06L'�,Ilt iY SA t1pN53 SLCr`I njotl M4 LV� 3FY9 9YNYM:O'1'1Y �l Y 3AV14 11YHS tl-sJ* .01 Alikl AI'JAION0 W) M. 111 rlrU11 IS s1NA Siij- 1111 rr �v lsw j to/b S� �, t j «� •,Y," � y�'� / r 1 1 ` I 13.11 v pY'M�Btl nNdlWl1Y r M; V'.'$t ! dy„ + k N nvw ;IN.i r/In i 4 90 011 03 9 i0 iLIVi-Itil tlt OJOW48N 7tl1Nl4 JY14 AI Nllwa- v LOVOknoe ]IIJOG1n V id All f/ / 1 A9BB lL' 1 ��dW` 40 AM V V,'+"�' l"W V t i0d0X(�N4 061 ityl$' !it YU 6 Grrt1 N ,�i 15N55J 0tl ( / 1 OOVNP 413 A0 0.101 'N1%i 1 J'i Ak Nr10.1 341'P6 vm'Vail YNa��I 4+��t .>n 331 n: >N,Iid Nod bHN d'3aTY:vM a a 8tH: 43(180)A4 QMV S18-IT') '" t S OFWMO'ib,)'l i HO IIIHI 3111 •6eI Nfi!.;•3Nia 3Hdi)'IA30 cILYNl1W03 3411 Aq 03AOMdNV 9114 lVld AINI /tW �' 9Y M1Qii'.)dY JN:3Wd0I3AY1 !,i IN(IWW(1_) is v 1.60 U.s'D S t 31311:€.a: 01111194 1111 ll f n 9661 ;Na 431 Nis '` 011 fUHVMl9MG AN t '- f0 A al ' ` .L . r l ,€1,1•+ �;, .. a N9dn'Y !I I f.,M"v .% 11_Nll10J e .�Hf A9 h dW 8Y�1'f'H 51��' 04'•.1 ' n�� le op.100'x, / Awsi - JU Yil "' HI 1V1"1NlId? t, !13111111 e311 N3dSV f 11? 6111 Ae nbNddY SvM LV Id AIH;. JAUtI dY 21+-IN I!.)NA A 1:) IA§INYgR•W Ill YI }.iio aw(011114 AN fiovwM ....F!i T..kB N6mi 3l 1 FAQ 4 AY0�.1�, 11 , *I s*)4Ia A9A9`M�1141; wo 33Y)I f.N30 1511 ONibO9N0i ..r 3AII40 1 Wilk•d do UNN93 w : Qi0.�..'0, i 04V1W'10}40 34Vin n ° 3AJO r too SN 9NQN lBY9 109 3L lINNJf NI NI l I 9N 7�Y3vN 3i NW iV % / A 1 CIS'1 V9N 4140�H IAIV1NOI N V14.lt1V NHik8SV3 4?1 1- ^V7YS O1V NOf ld•3:)3N 1 9)*1Vµ4 Al 1151 NO 6W 41't�W 3VlJNYN N ANV ii{M Ill 30 M.A 541 A Or l- A M NON>3NOR4Y N3N 3N .IN, 33113 A1Nt10 Ni W s 1YHi 033WY 1 NddOtl{Ni L3Nl 361! dl. 1111 .0000 N3ON(t 4 O13Y ' `4 , 331NVMVnp MON x3Ii. d0 MlNI dO 1.INVd AYAN.7AG Jl BOkS' V NON 311'1 do 4-MLOMY NV 8Y(I'v) N 'qY W AN 4i 0111lil lNe;3 ' N ul 3111 oMV :d11. Il N0 9HiV1:41JYN 9141 9Ai IHM 3N 13101101?V 3 S cl C)H 1 H : r O1 1 i•Nls 331 ON)N }vtll TIN No 4NN39etu19 6`d0 /£e 6t2b 1.yW°r/ .a i i>AM+}N3i1 q.yu ggpp AVN"J / /r. " y .W11 11 did(t6.•s " N 1R i MMMlt�U3d Sl IYNI A:11 JN � N 4 t� Y I♦ A9t,c l. a33Nis,A 131 N- N{M I 3N Lfi `1 •A 03t.MV AIM d •.� � �^ V.Hf 9111 A-dk YV9'NV SAWq,, Ni].;M Mt 11+3 M"!A I}1161"0113NA^1N Hi2V ii00+s'�kM ^71Nf YO 141 1SN3f1Nf1 3W1 Y rl c?i t i l i l l l t v Yz 931Y0 - 3M 93hN9ik / 3rv: i l 4-1114 J NIYt+d 1 1 331 1 -'Oy0'OF k^ 3LV9MD 01 14 a3«x .MriH h}UI.i 4o1NO M1' 3'F'. 1 V" f Nllt 191 Mo} 3+,x S1,AW11 Ix)Mbi T'¢.3YJf INY 194 Ll VIS 1351499 0001030.5 ry11M+ NI iMBa 93111 11 UV3Nf Wi ..,..-... .. '.-.." VIP nU NI W:6- 161011 VNf}l$1O N/1 Ij 11111 413YW 9 167NHf ( / Mi f1N 01 f1N#Il d0 fN01AN1{If-0 'svA�1Xt1(W4 JIM mI1VJ03 1. / .r:6. 553N00Y 331401 f t V%i dV gxvNV kWAH At3w3w,.vw a 3 411 ONV 1dYN SIHl Ib AVM I1)C 111µ13V 9NY 103434 0 LON LN3N11{,M�1.�$1A 11 iYU N(1 NMONS 601341 Yti 3N.+ rt_- .G. 9FIY No,7 A-, 3 4vw 11Fi 631('1 ANV. 3604 NO", 0, N to l NO -S )OALNI!J A3A N1?9 • 1310 NOI�.V3O'I 3114 dYN NIN1 lr4=18 Cr Y9N1 03LY�bl;iq Ok / 1311111•.}SYM,Wl 1009 V'"I.TV 040010:) 4114103 Hl N1Id N3MCV 30 Nr / rr . 1, 11 a'AyN3MJMN G 1ti'}°+40 NO3b 341 3001 1{,Y nb 141 ANaM16 4NY 101[13400 4W 3A IVA 44— Ca tlV11W1 O'NriO3N3d 6YM 434109 V 1VHi F3�'N3."s k#431 NJ 1140101 NNW v `' N1YMf, �� � �sY.11-.i1i��) •;aoA�nar' 3 )1 is / 0155.- j1 311N1NVW !MY 9dMtdx9 1691 AN _8, IT IN .iNO t91V 011111.Wi 1:s'"011'4 xDN Ai 11ft C] 0 ' 1131.VNV LO V i d3MS 931310N3;Y YM iI NHANH O010 Is 6660 $N 14{IOpl tl kll 030 toslw AV IN3Ni NNN,A3A 1114:'Wo, l; � .M AtNi1Q:.1 � � S ,Y ^,t• ,A3 ° i Vl5 ti 91 ON 9(011'(Nd':313.N"^ 7 ' ImoC S —'s It AW VIJ (INV OWN AN f'M mam 0657 1 r 1s' L A1V %gNjT y,d ,i,,!a 4v 4 Nl 3NC.Aq 14EM13.3MON 4114 1'3111 / ! i NALN Il Vlfi 091111)19 !D 3 Vdi 3+.. ... NiNils is 414010,'d3%9y an Ait3 M,30Vd tv f° NOO4 IV Id _ IU 1N dlNMO .,,r 1{t,1 13(111(1 0#010,01,10314!1 LY3d 1V9H3aN'1V zMVMns)e 314 All )D$V,l 4 ,qN _ dU s,•- ., l l i8fld `A ti t�y u4Nt S1M31AS'33 Hit G7 WV i1V# 4{.3111)1999(INV yI Nit 10 ,),so 133110 411/31040 1111 L' I(„, r (� ( 'q r ] / J [j r ,,] /y,� ( T I�' } r r INV i Sl)1 O.,NI INYS 311. 03¢1V Id .to dtV7 9e N'AS3NN 15#644.q MIN _ (1 r,! ,.A., l../ t :�/ ! t t_1,1... L glyr�l� 1�.`t:1 r.�AJ E� { �� �/ .r)A y l'� f F it UNi (I NOJAil IOIN3 AI kW 4-14AA1 WV-40hin0N43141.401 1 0#000« ll/�lx 4M)F9;1'J Sr o"1tIl Govito J �f 'r.3.NY1U;l NI JI1,Id IM IBV n 7 341 0i ONV1 NIX 10 5N�IW10 IN'A) y( p�/ / �{ _ 7( }MS VNVI ONV 31131.t VNi. Itl3S.Md 311941 Ad SN HU /"IV**II ..�,V-11'1 N01 ,� JIN'.7x' NO IS,1 'A 1 �JC��1�? Ntii,V)1:131`.I f1NV d H1,89NMO 1.40 NOI1.VDI.il.d�') N3dSV :fin ,k-L10