Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.114 Neale Ave.0001.2013.AHPC-- 0001.2013.Ahpc 114 Neale Ave 2737 07 3 83 002 Conceptual Review H r f Aff 2 101 8 0 ed 14©ze P i VIO il S yl/l,t»/1 1~ «·j- 3+Vt»ug ~767£/0 9-0~A/0-6 0-~ 4- / ~ -22€2 1. Ac- - 5 6.-/-- C~Al APE F., li 1 .. THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0001.2013.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 07 3 83 002 PROJECTS ADDRESS 114 NEALE AVE PLANNER JUSTIN BARKER CASE DESCRIPTION CONSEPTUAL REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE STEEV WILSON DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.22.13 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 11/18/13 A LEGEND AND NOTES ------- O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCR I BED ky ------- 3- DIA. B.L.M. BRASS CAP E.A.T. 11 20% - 30% 435 SO FT ./- --------r-~«1\ 909 H e £ UTILITY BOX MANHOLE ------- f ~«/ 1 ... ./org ph A 0 0 0 FENCE Q3 UTILITY POLE ~ 1 / 44/88 f 1% %92 DRAIN i \ /1/ 30% AND OVER 697 SO FT •/- \ \ \X,L 1--10' ® WATER VALVE ~ 7 1 1 ri r~%:~Q-~ A SURVEY CONTROL ··--- · 0 10 20 , FIRE HYDRANT \\\ \,~\ \\\ r\ /-0 TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: 7 /\ \\0 \\\\ \ NG©Ol'I>44. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. ~<f f<···. -- ~2<0422'„ ®brt : DATED: MAY 6. 2002 CASE NO. PCTI 7029L / 3, ''1'j\ \ \ 1010 , \$- .r- .CA/-7 r. ....1 ..1.-11 B. A r. r A ., L g I RAVEL ---- -2--u 'RI VE \ \ 40 23*f 65/5 .1 tr/PA- B.L.M. TEE 11_ 7925.41 7 \\\ f GRAVEL DRIVE h \ 10 FOOT WIDE --DITCH EASEMENT -*. ALONG CENTERLINE 2 ~ RECORDED IN OUNTY OF PITKIN. IBED HEREON WAS 212- AND IS ACCURATE THERE ARE NO TS. ENCROACHMENTS. WITH NO ABOVEGROUND R KNOWN TO ME. PLIED TO THE ESS WET STAMPED ECISION IS LESS .U e .4."%06/AP..de (?P -'444#Opr O% ~ 1,4 /01 - ·6 lit A OP #EXWD DRIVE ENCROACHES 9 0 0172%%49.. 0 - '91,p 0PA~58£3 1.p Cb €E·, us \\ PAVED DRIVE IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPH1 C PAVED 40. Nx DRIVE SURVEY Sh 0 NO. 5 RE-BAR ---** LOT I. AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT OF 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT. according to the Plat thereof recorded Moy 29. I998 in Plot Book 45 at Poge 17 ACCESS EASEMENT CITY OF ASPEN PLAT BOOK 13 PITKIN COUNTY AT PAGE 35 STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING: 0.138 ACRES •/- 6.001 SO FT ./ HERRON PARK PREPARED BY 24 3> !11 1110 2 0 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. %2 3 m 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL £ m ~ m ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS ~Z ~ PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE DATE JOB CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR. 04/12 22 I 29C C 43-neral CADD 10\G,d\G1tdh22129( gxd -- 01/07/2013 -- 10.14 AM - Sci- 1 120 000 . . - ./M=MHZ..pil-4.1.1.....4.-il.... 0 . D ... . 0 - V 0. . 0 . I. P. .... . 1 0 . D . ..: 0 1 00 ... . . 0 ..1 . 1 : 1. ~~N.... ./1/Ir" . 0 ..... 0 I :.0.0. 00 . - /j;d/E//Uy,~A . 0 , 0 0 . , 0 D: .. . '. ... --%499--- D . D , 0 f, E.-1 , t 1,111. W I. 4 .. 1 11 III)l h L / *07 D 0 . I <6 .... 7 Al.2 ,. Al""""IM",1,0**b I \ 4 4/ 0 0 .- A . . *80, ; , . 0.-2 \. 1 c ' 1 1 1 1. h' \ 1 ..1 1, .. r ' I *u.4-1 1 • 1 1 JIrm-i: . D \ ~ , - -M/4.:>ir~ . 0. , - i .If.=.44* 7., f . , 4, ip.Mul I. M 9-:1 11.- I 1~i ... . 4#f -~1*AAI~Vy 0 D a I . 440,0. i ek•24*2 66: 1 . . I ine 1/\11:118 . 1-'/Clizliz~.1~.. IWI///' ' I. M.I.- D . : '41 3* 2-i r•,Ct;!41iJ*'1% =_ . ..aid -4 1 .. - „\4 43, i*~:~ ' bl;~U li'L/./14 7 4 \\ .1 4 0 . I I e 1, .\ A ID) , 1\ c .t .. .. .... ,. . 0 di: .. L. 1 3 '' di: .. W 0 DID , I 1 - ... - . 1. . D . 1 D I. . . ... :0 ,. .. ... 0 ID . 4 0 1 .. . D .0 0 . 1.1 0 . 1 0 I. i j,• ··7 I .. : 4 ... .j.. 62.0 ?r.Mt€ ... /. to · ay . .:4 ./ ' ·/ f#tb·®*h' 2737-07-3 - €3-002- 0001'20) 5. All fc I lill- i- - I - ..I -®- I --- -1.-- - - ./-.~,~-9-prE~- I - ec .- 4 ....E I .Fl . ...F-- L • =- _T. - -*Di.,at T0T1 -._ _ -T _. IV.B 3 f i jump 1 1, li 0 0 1. n. x:_ .-I:. -9 - 1 1 -FIr.'5 ret te i...15. ~8* 4:*hments Rou)4* juion lite'! Culy' F.* id *miG F,[* ~~t,0~4 94~ ~ U• 1.14, 31, .47151®0 Li US' *mit # 1.1.19 i LU 1: rer, : 2255 lili WEAEAE ** Ign Z¢ RT-7 Fmt*crlbon 11 A. 0-1 *1£ Fap~'-~ F'oje = 53&15 ening Appre,d : 1 0 | Desc.on APPJOIC¢I FEEK CONJEEJ,Al;EMBA Aj] 2413.DEED?ENT bjec -~ ao~*anal 9 --- Submited FEEY MliON *24 1 Cloct 1- f 0 EgE iE--1 0;mer 1.00:n .D'S FAVILYRI.IS- , Ars,r' ji, C~!°F 13 EMIT·LT)N Ul fasTON n 77006 Phote WI ERE ' Add:es 1 20*erisappliant? 000**FISOppild? LEt!21118 7JK.Uf, MIl; L.li ~ Flm n,Ille STS':4·1901 '11' 6 SPQNG ST r 4 CO 81611 Rone )93416? Cud f |27,B AMp. FF ' lender En=C ~ F~111&mel : F,098!; h*?202:r~?085, &:DenGcld§(sgt agel&///1 oil I 616* /9 90 *12-1 9 42 0041 00 64002-t 33 od 1 3 · 2-1 l'b 1 0 000» 2- p r ocfs . -*Or•, 9=wir,11 '«'r,11'I, l|I ... 11't , 1.J q -1.-1; -1 ... MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Ireland and Aspen City Council FROM: Justin Barker, Planner ~rbvj RE: Notice of HPC approval of Conceptual Major Development and a Setback Variance for 114 Neale Avenue, HPC Resolution #8, Series of 2013 MEETING DATE: May 13, 2013 BACKGROUND: On March 20, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) approved Conceptual Major Development Review and a Setback Variance for a project at 114 Neale Avenue. The approval included remodeling and expanding existing non-historic additions and adding a garage and subgrade living space. HPC granted approval finding that the elements to be remodeled have no historic significance. The remodeled and expanded additions are lower than the Victorian building and located near the back. The proposed garage is partially subgrade and does not interfere with the historic building. The subgrade living space is completely hidden from view. HPC granted a front yard setback variance in order to allow the subgrade living space to use the same foundation wall as the historic house. HPC also granted a floor area bonus to allow the roof above the garage to be usable as a green roof. Planning staff recommended approval of the design review with conditions. HPC approved the design with conditions to approve a 6 foot front yard variance and grant a 400 square foot floor area bonus by a vote of 7-0. A copy of the approved conceptual design is attached as Exhibit A. The HPC Resolution and Minutes are attached as Exhibits B and C, respectively. PROCEDURE: This is not a public hearing and no staff or applicant presentation will be made at the May 13th Council meeting. If you have any questions about the project, please contact the staff planner, Justin Barker, 429-2797 or justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. Pursuant to Section 26.412.040(B), notification of this HPC approval must be placed on City Council's agenda within 30 days. City Council has the option of exercising the Call Up provisions outlined in Section 26.412.040(B) within 15 days of notification on the regular agenda. For this application, City Council may vote to Call Up the project at their May 13th or May 28th meeting. If City Council does not exercise the Call Up provision, the HPC Resolution shall stand, and the applicant will move forward to the Final design review hearing. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Conceptual Design Exhibit B: HPC Resolution #8, Series 2013 Exhibit C: HPC minutes from March 20,2013 LEGEND AND NOTES 3- 61/. ....11. - C' t... 11 0 ./.1- ./ , 1- INC ' i 0 .iurr •0. FFE-'33 / //''Ils- i ..<227. 9 3:... 1%5%&1 --- 4/i «8\ %; - A '/*:' CO,1.0/ F. 1 0 0 . 11 .24>lvi <k h / TITU 1-0-~i:CM-1*De .c r.~c+VA 31 '01\ 1 Tr~~ c,AIpeR . i,AES ~F·c-,a. Wee.euo.. CL-Oal. 1~~ * .* I Z. \1\ h ' \\\A \ \\\ i BE~='-9=-:. I ·r.L . a h /4%< / --:L Rb/s-6-08,:1216--71(49p - lu-'1·. 4\9\ 64-. out zg='M ='m: EJ=&5%/&-A=,W. 4 #',/43 unul. 4 .Al / 4 \ lt.; ~ HOUSE ' ··· \\ 6 4, & - .'ll COMO~ 1 ME r .9. . 42 - I ' EZE- . 5*., \ e - /diA '.F 0 ... 4 VICINITY MAP \*. 1 r -Twi - =:219(.242 fal,%*f,0 I.i.... 14 1 /4.2,2. - :46. t s™,t FArio 4. - 47 42 . 4 11 *Egl ~~ITIC 6;*Eik . il 11 4 c :.....9.- ..717-.4,1 -rkECSU A PARCEL 2 I J'.22,9=Mt,8*EMmiAIM. .. LOT 2 2 =IMCATi- * * ME~~11 m®-1. ~-a,~- uy,LITIES •,™ 1,8 -ou® / - C• cm @Ril:2.6=.615= \6 *A :.'4 964 64'Z%44~.~. ¤ *·#4, '~4~ d" . & 7. : IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC 4 SURVEY _ 4 --- 20~ &3,2- CO~TAIN- 0.1.-•i. '.001 .. •/- HERRON PARK -ED .¥ ASPEN SUR WY EMI NGERS. 1 NC. ....f./ '0701 915·3~16 DA. JO• .1,06 9. i , FORUM PHI 1%7 Scue 6¢rrle 6';tel *Ae 2Ce ,40-,. Celood,)81811 KING STREET p.*70)27.....60.#5585 e 53- EDGE , 2 114 NEALE Don & * Short " Exem'. FAVE,mfr 114 Nlle Aver.-le A,perk Colorado 81811 / \ 90 BE \ ~ ~~M~LK«J- --ERL. trv.,DE[)r~CHEUE'el EXISTr4O CU.VERTEDWCH CONSULTANTS SURVIVOR P=m..'/"' 1 43«'P,(>.-:.')=29:*,.A*ilos,0 X L ASP..COLORAD0818,1 P.(eyeleM. ---1+,1-'DE'%2~4Mil<A '\4:~-.4 \ r.(97092/WO CML < < ~27- ' 1' Trzj] 4..read.\ 106 ~ 11 i \(.,1.Iot.1/ -1 G*oosplma, Co,1€01 GEOTECH i lic i ......CH 6,20 cot,Mrt ROAD ~54 P 1070)..... 1 0 F.{070)00·8454 STRUCTURAL 'BC> 11 ©\iF€*12 CONTRACTOR 18D 941%9)Uct] .*%/hipffyt·, PROPOSED Fet€E ¥.2--*-2-<Slyx V.\1%323/\ 1 Ta l 44,1~ 1- -98* - - -12,1 f S{ 1,9,0 HPCCONCEPT. REV. PRog07 NO 1211 DRAW:48¥. €AX 2,1- D . - .#*Ep COPYRIGHT FORUNPHI... / 1 1-3 EXK,Te¢GEENCE TO REMAIN SHEET TITLE 5!TE.AN lm· • 1'~· AO.01 SITE PLAN 1 + f FORUM PHI '17 6.1.1 5'N Soll ./' 202 4%/¢10,«%0.611 P l070)270~167 F·(66~177/5305 114 NEALE Don IAnn Short 114 Nutelve,lue Aspen, Coido 8 I 611 OY' CONSULTANTS SU VE OR- 21080U1/GNENAS'RE€Er ASPEN. COLOR•~0 8~61 1 P....5-38/ 8EOROOUSUITE F. (D70)9*3818 CIVIL 1. GEOTECH ..0.0,1 6020©Ot~,YROAS 16,1 / F.{~70%*I OLe,Vi!00DSPRINGS~COO1601 p (.70,0,w,08 STRUCTURAI TeD CONTRACTOR !80 WN.00/ S€Of«]0116UITE SO 1/0~1 "PCCONGE~r. .WECTND '211 ORA#/Y· EAH : COPYRIONT FORUM PHI, LLC SueORADE . . M SHEETUTLE Al.01 FLOOR PLANS FORUM PHI 1,7 60. S,re Stril Sul 232 Aspe&/elorad*~611 P two' 2744157 F. {008) 770·55/5 114 NEALE Don & Ani Short 114 Ne/•A-ue Alpan. Color'do 81811 =1 PC.VDER CONSULTANI Ille.00/ SURVIVOR 'BAR•+REA A-el COUgADD.611 P (0701$.18 8€DROON SUITE '~ F (970)~S38!~ CML TBO ~ 02-TEC'-1 H....Cll 1.-r\ 5020/OUNT¥RO~DlSI 1/ 00#A.00 SPIUNGS, CO 81601 P 1.70)94"8. /1070}04&84/ STRUCTURAL 180 DOG W~H / CONTRACTOR 'Ob == : BAAASE "t 14./1 .....1C~-1 FC ----,31 7---7 BEOR0046UrIE 1 ----6- 1 1 '' I 1 ' 1,~Ma HPC CONCEPT. REV ia, Be~Ct:40 1211 m..48'f. Eli COPYR%(*G loRUMPHK,tic t.OY,ERL5£1. 1/4. . 1/ SHEETTITLE Al.02 FLOOR PLANS [ri A FORUM PHI 117 80•h Epl·, St,~e~ Gu~ 202 *$*8161' P (170)27*4157 F *5]77/SS63 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 114'881.Avenue Aven, Cotorn¢081811 ~ STORAGE tua ,=1,1 \<r meN ~t 11 CONSULTANTS i, UYING ROOM \ U SURVEYOR 21. SOU™G~ENASTAE€T Ir I DEcK ii ~Pel COLORADO,1611 1 4 P 070)-216 it IML F. (,70)02/3/. !. 60®COL.*m'ROAD,54 GEOTECH ii HPUED.CH ./.,iMO.P.%S /06t.01 p {870; 945-7™ F *70....54 STRUCTURAL CONTRACTOR Iblu ID 'REENROD. -1 'ASTER SUITE : 1 \ 3 GO 1/0/13 'PCCONCEPT.REV P.ECTNO. 1211 CRAWNS¥ EAH COPYRIGRT .......0 MANLEVEL 1/4· • 1'. SHEETTITLE Al.03 FLOOR PLANS 1 1 FORUM PHI e /7 eouth Sp,N Wo ~ Sut~ 202 Alpe¢€10'~081*11 I (170) 270·4157 F·088I .565 114 NEALE Don & Ari Short 114 Nes!*Avenue Alen. Colorado 81611 --------- -BOSTING %. t '. , t.6/ .OPE hCONSULTANTS SURVEYOR- 21 0 SOUTH GRLENA sTREET ASPICOLORADO.1611 4 -0284818 F (970I.W.0 CML 1/;*50 1. .GEOTECH HP..ECH 6020 COL~m' ROAD 'S,41 .EM,0~6.INGS. Coleol P t»701#0 F+19701*~S·8~$4 STRUCTURAL r- CONTRACTOR r,!D . 1;o,r„ 11PCCO~CEPT. REV. 44 PROJECTNO mil ~ OR..J.: E.1 COPYR'.f. FORLIJ ./. LLC ROOF W • 1 -0· SHEETTITZE Al.04 ROOF PLAN A,A FORUM PHI 11760:,th 'AS~el Gut* 202 A.per./06.80.1611 p le,0,21~41*FF. (BIG)7106585 --- . 114 NEALE Ocr- a An, Short 2 ------- ' % i 114 Neale Aw,nue -+944-1 I ii 1 1 Aspe,6 Color/081811 -l 92 1/ 1 11 11 1 ...1 1 11 11 1 <92 , . CONSULTANTS ESURVIVORD0Rfm~·N~-- lie . N 210 SOW™ 'AlENASTREE' 21 NORTH . - r. 2 NOR™ ASPEUOOLORADO'1611 P. (870)92~3818 F:(070}926*16 CML T. GEOTECH T HPOEO'ECH 6020COUNT¥/C~D 164 /,0....D IPRING'. CO.1601 P.(670)94$„788. F. I870)64"AM , S TRUCTLRAL Bu./. WAT...... IBU LCoNCRETE I /60,M;S CONTRACTOR 1 ---- 1 . ISTEEL 4. WOOD PANEL. I E....CUP.0.010.... 1 - ./.4 ......... FE32-_ I-E·=F~E'.- 12· hSUFfll-- ~n'.2~ ' ' -l-li fEEl --1 ~---1 4» 3 - 1 1 SO 1,/11 -C CONCEPT. REV - PROJECTNO 1211 1 1 G-© ' DRA¥·NIY: Eli Corrn,016 ........C ' .ST 1/4· . itc· SHEETTITLE A2.01 ELEVATIONS ( FORUM PHI A»-2-1,/A.57~ I. 1 -- --Em- 11780*.......LS,A.202 A~Pe•I.Cal.*1811 /7'\*UNEILLL*-f,12,3-43 P. (070)270·4157 F (668) 77&5385 =·n·.rart=E- 114 NEALE Doa & Ar,1 Ghorl 114 Nea'Avenue Aspan, Colo,ado 81811 - -rn r=T~L~-~154 --IER -0-*l - .-----1 [111]_It =245 - I =1 4 - 2. 1- .. / Gly-:3. CONSULTANTS 4*N*Evrn~mi·m--- AspilcoLo.O.1811 ' p 21060UrM.......Er P (870)92&38'8 kic*17~.~ m,4 F {07....18 CML TAD 4 SOUTH 1/4. 1 1'-r 4.1 SOUTH . . 10 GEOTECH ....CH 60®COUrn'RO,1,0154 GLEM.000 EPRING' ¢0 81601 4.94&·7088 F (9701045·84/ STRUCTURAL #INGMATER-'OFND reD i, CONCRErE 7 GLASS G.r: 181.[L CONTRACTOR 180 4.V#Wh 'DISTING CU~80/40 TORE'AN ---IL.*~***-WIT ~t 4 U A--- U 'U U R | U pil 1 i ----- -1 1 . 1~/3 WIC COMI. REV --- PA.€CT NO ./ -==, -==-=m.7«96 DRAWNEY: t,1,4 .. COPYRIGI~ FORUI,1 1441 LLC »44«94»91«1 h »»tuaa««»A/:**4***<.1. - . • '•F 1 /'T SHEET TIBLE A2.02 ELEVATIONS Rt-=s=:r A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 114 NEALE AVENUE, LOT 1, 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION #8, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-83-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, DWS Family Trust, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, requested HPC Conceptual Major Development and Variance approval for the property located at 114 Neale Avenue, Lot 1,114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Subdivision; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. 'I'he HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, the HPC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C. 1.a, Variances. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, the HPC may grant up to five hundred (500) additional square feet of allowable floor area for projects involving designated historic properties according to Section 26.415.110.F, Floor area bonus. In granting a floor area bonus, the applicant must demonstrate to HPC that: a. The design ofthe project meets all applicable design guidelines; b. The historic building is the key element of the property and the addition is incorpgrated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building; c. The work restores the existing portion of the building to its historic appearance; RECEPTION#: 598159, 03/29/2013 at 114 Neale Ave. 11:28:29 AM, HPC Resolution #8, Series of 2013 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Page 1 of 3 d. The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's form, materials or openings; e. The construction materials are of the highest quality; f. An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions ofthe building; g. The project retains a historic outbuilding; and/or h. Notable historic site and landscape features are retained. Granting o f additional allowable floor area is not a matter of right but is contingent upon the sole discretion of the HPC and the Commission's assessments of the merits of the proposed project and its ability to demonstrate exemplary historic preservation practices; and, WHEREAS, Justin Barker, in his staff report to HPC dated March 20, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 20,2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 7 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That I IPC hereby grants Conceptual Major Development and Variance approval for the property located at 114 Neale Avenue with the following conditions: l. HPC grant a front yard variance of 6 feet for the subgrade space. 2. HPC grant a 400 square foot floor area bonus. 3. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year o f the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension o f the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date, 114 Neale Ave. HPC Resolution #8, Series of 2013 Page 2 of 3 APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 20th day of March, 2013. , 13 1/ 4 14££, / kk.-k/1 Ann Mullins, Chair Approud as t~ Fgrm: F 11 j c Debbie-'Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: ···kl4144 <051,Ld\10-1'Ut 2.- , Kathy Strtekland, Chief Deputy Clerk 114 Neale Ave. IIPC Resolution #8, Series of 2013 Page 3 of 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2013 Chairperson, Ann Mullins called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Nora Berko, Jay Maytin, Jamie MeLeod, Sallie Golden, Patrick Sagal and Jane Hills. Willis Pember was absent. Staff present: Deborah Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy City Clerk Justin Barker, Planner MOTION: Jamie moved to approve the minutes of February 13th , second by Ann. All in favor, motion carried. MOTION: Jane moved to approve the minutes of February 2001 , second by Ann. All in favor, motion carried. 208 E. Main Street - Conceptual Major Development, Demolition, Special Review and Variances - Continued Public Hearing Amy said this is a continued public hearing and conceptual review for a new addition at the back of the mines cottage. You are being asked to consider on-site relocation, special review for reconfiguration of the trash enclosure. Setback variances are on the table and a request to waive the parking requirements. We are looking at the preservation ofthe miner's cottage that has a lean-too on the back. An existing non-historic addition is partially being retained with a residential cube at the back that is slightly linked to the historic shed. Staff is not supporting the enclosure on the roof. There are a couple of building code issues that are not resolved right now. There is an egress problem from one ofthe bedrooms. A ramp is needed from the side of the salon back to the alley and could be shown at final. On the setbacks the board wanted a minimum o f three feet on either side o f the cube. We do support the revised trash area and it is an improvement over what is there now and we support the waiver of one parking space and the cash in lieu fees. Staff is recommending conceptual approval. Sarah Upton represented the applicant. Sarah went over the changes and the shed has shifted to the west about three feet in order to have access to the alley. The connector piece is a little different in shape. 1 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20,2013 The stair is along the east side o f the property. In doing so that pushes the bedroom and egress window over to the west. The stair enclosure is important to the client because the site is very tight and they would like access to some outdoor space. The enclosure allows for better access, better use o f the roo f top. On the new construction on the upper level it steps back three feet. The issue with the ramp is that it has to go to the trash area. Jamie said the coat closet is proposed to be filled in to complete the corner. The next level is set back three feet and the roo f terrace is at the same level as the second floor. Jamie asked about the window well for the salon. We might be able to do a light well under the ramp to allow light in to the basement. We are maxed out at net livable even though we are under the FAR. The ramp falls under the IBC which is more restrictive. We would also need a variance. Sarah said we are taking space away from the salon to allow the residence to come in. Jay suggested a sloped stair cover rather than from the front to the back. Sallie asked i f the wrap around stair was incorporated how much lower would the enclosure be. Sarah said it has been incorporated and it is as low as it can be at 7 feet. We are willing to look at options such as Jay's suggestion. Chairperson, Ann Mullins opened the public comment portion ofthe agenda itern. Rich Pierce said he and his Mother are neighbors to the east. Our biggest concern is if it moves to the east and how it will affect our property line. We are supportive of the project in general. We want to make sure the construction people are mindful of our property. Exhibit I letter Jake Vickery one ofthe owners of the property on the west. Our property is like the twin ofthis miner's building. The revised plans improve a lot of things. We are hung up on the 0 lot line on our side o f the lot split line. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2013 There are a lot of functional concerns, roof drainage, fire access, egress, site drainage. We need to do something positive on the space between them. That space needs to be shared by both sides and a minimum of six feet which means each side would contribute three feet. We are going to do something similar to what the Tulio's are doing. By having it on the properly line it pushes the burden onto our property. You could move the lower wall in three feet which would create the space. Photograph Exhibit II Chairperson, Ann Mullins closed the public comment section of the agenda itern. Ann identified the issues: Connector Staircase enclosure, covered or not covered 3 foot setback as opposed to the one foot requested Ramp Trash Parking Waiver Patrick said this is one ofthe premier properties on Main Street and anything we can do to enhance that I would be in favor of. I feel the three foot setback should be respected due to safety and fire concerns. My main concern is the glass issue on top of the roof. I also feel the staircase should not be enclosed. Regarding guideline 10.9 I am OK with the deck as long as it is invisible from Main Street. Jamie said she is ok with the shed reduction of two feet. Trash and utility plan is ok as long as it is approved by Environmental Health. I am in favor ofthe cash-in-lieu. My two concerns are the ramp and the lightwell and the fact that we have no drawing as to what you want and what the Building Dept. wants which would affect the neighbor to the east. I am not in favor of increasing the setback and filling in the corner. Lets not put a burden on the neighbor next door. The roo f top enclosure is proposed as glass and I do not feel that is appropriate when lights are on etc. at night. I am in favor of the roo f deck but just not in favor o f the enclosure. I am also in favor o f waiving the parking spaces but still getting the cash-in-lieu. Nora said she is in favor ofkeeping the three foot setback and the roof deck should not be enclosed. My concern is height creep and the height on the block is really low. I would like to see the cash and respect the setbacks. 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2013 Jane said she agrees on the setbacks and they are an issue. The only outstanding issue for me other than the set back is looking for an option for the stair enclosure. There are many creative solutions that could make it better for the community. I am in fuvor o f waiving the parking and agree with the trash enclosure. Sallie said she supports the shed and supports waiving the cash-in-lieu and the parking waiver. I feel the light-well can be worked out. The west side variance should remain the same. On the roof top I understand why you - - want it enclosed as it is the only "yard" you have to use. The design needs - worked on to get the board on your side. In the West end there are enclosures that are a lot smaller. Jay said the enclosure is the sticking point. The new design is a great improvement. The ramp can't go anywhere else so it shouldn't be a sticking point. The shed is OK. It is a great improvement from the last meeting. Ann said she feels the parking and cash-in-lieu should be waved. Michael thanked the neighbors for their comments. The ramp just came from the last meeting. We tried to make the cabin stand alone and we have no other livable outdoor space other than the roo f top. The stairway is a huge concern going up three levels. If I didn't need the enclosure I wouldn't ask you for one. We are under 28 feet and if I were to put the gable up there the entire mass on the block would be 28 feet. I'm not attached to the glass and we can change the materials. The only other way to get there is an outside stairway on the east side of the building. The salon is a big part o f the project and I need every bit of space to make this work. It is a tight space. I need to bedrooms for my kids and one for us and a kitchen and living room. I need volume either on the interior or exterior. Jay pointed out that the enclosure is under the height limit of around-27 feet. Through materials we might want to look at our thought process again. Sallie said no one is opposed to putting something up on the roof. Patrick said if he had a gabled roofthere would be more space and you could have a loft. 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2013 Ann pointed out that we are also looking at the surroundings and street elevations around the property. MOTION: Ann made the motion to approve resolution #7 as recommended by Staff. The east entry to the commercial space to provide a ramp towards the alley as well, where an accessible route to the alley trash enclosure is needed. Eliminate the enclosure for the roo f access stair. Provide a $15,000 letter of credit. Entirely respect-a 3' setback along the west lot line with all new construction. 3' east sideyard reduction for new lightwells. 3'2" east sideyard setback reduction for an existing entry into the salon. 5' rear yard setback reduction for the shed. 2' west sideyard setback reduction for an addition to the Victorian. Trash OK as approved by Environmental Health Dept. One required on-site parking space and cash-in-lieu fees waived. Jane said the applicant could build a more massive project. I would suggest they come back one more time to study the roof and stair. This project deserve that opportunity. Jay said they are preserving the shed. Motion second by Nora. Jay said he would support the motion of the west setback was taken out. The applicant embraced the shed and we should approve this project and they also brought the plate height down. - - Jane said she would like to see this continued rather than killing the development project. It is an ongoing business here in Aspen. Nora withdrew her second. Motion second by Patrick. Patrick, yes; Jay, no; Jane, no; Nora, no; Sallie, no; Jamie, no; Ann, yes. Motion fails. MOTION: Jay moved to eliminate #2, change #4 to a 2 foot setback on the west and keep everything else in the resolution. Motion second by Jane. 5 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20,2013 Vote: Jamie, no; Sallie, yes; Nora, yes; Jane, yes; Jay, yes; Patrick,no; Ann, no. MOTION: Jamie made the motion to continue the application until June 12th and look and the enclosure and setbacks and look at them properly. The ramp and lightwell need to work together. They also need to study the airlock. Motion second by Ann. Ann said we are basically talking about the enclosure and the setback on the west side and the ramp. Sallie said the applicant needs to know what the building department wants. Jamie asked the board how they feel about the construction on the west side. Ann said the enclosure needs to go away or be radically changed. Jane said she has no problem with the second level. The first level should remain with the 3 feet. Jay is ok with what was presented. Patrick agreed with staff eliminate the enclosure and respect the three foot setback. Sallie said the issues should be restudied so the applicant can move forward. Patrick, no; Jay, no; Ann, yes; Jamie, yes; Sallie, yes; Jane, yes; Ann, yes. Motion carried 5-2. 314 Gillespie - Minor Development - Public Hearing Debbie said the public notice is in order and the applicant can proceed. Exhibit I. Amy said this is a landmark house with an addition to the back that extends to the north. The work proposed is in that area. There is a floor level change that is a safety issue that causes some head height issues with the proposed dormers. There was a discussion as to whether the dormer should 6 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2013 be shed or gabled. The only condition is that the new construction should not compete with the original detailing o f the historic building. Louis Menendez, architect for the project. The motivation is the hazardous condition in the master bedroom suite. The master bedroom has two steps to the bathroom. They are older and the husband has already fallen on the steps. The solution is to raise the floor ofthe bathroom even with the bedroom floor which raises it about a foot and that causes the walls to be very low about 4 92 feet. We want to extend the height to 8 !4 feet to give room to the bathroom to be able to reconfigure the fixtures and have two dormers to make the space functional. The addition would be on the second floor at the very back. Part o f the existing bathroom will be remodeled. The walls and roof would be continued at the same height. It will most likely not be visible from the street. We are proposing a shed form dormer. There are existing shed form dormers on the house. I am not opposed to changing some of the detailing on the fascia board. We are proposing the same materials. The roof is wood shingles and the wall would be wood painted. Chairperson, Ann Mullins opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public comment section of the agenda item was closed. Issue: Extension over the flat roof to accommodate the bathroom remodel. Jamie said because this is an addition to an addition I wouldn't change the materials because you are only extending it out 8 feet. Jane, Patrick and Ann agreed with Jamie's statement. MOTION: Jamie moved to approve resolution #7 striking #1 and that the details remain as is. Motion second by Ann. All in favor motion carried 7-0. 114 Neale Avenue - Conceptual Major Development and Variances - Public Hearing Debbie said the public notice is in order and the applicant can proceed. Exhibit I 7 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2013 Justin Barker, planner said the lot is just over 6,000 square feet and it was part of a lot split in 1998 which split the property in half and moved the house up to the northern part ofthe property. There is an historic miner's cottage and a non-historic addition. The applicant would like to expand the rear addition and adding a garage and sub-grade living space. For the subgrade they would need a variance. The proposal exceed the allowable FAR dictated by the lot split of 1345 so they are requesting a 500 square foot bonus. Most ofthe changes are setback from Neale Ave. and are screened by trees. Both floors would be expanded a little toward the south. According to the design guidelines any addition should be set back ten feet from the primary fagade and he garage is less than that. Staff feels since it is mostly set sub-grade and into the topography staff feels that it really doesn't compete with the historic facade. If we required the full ten foot space one of the parking spaces would be unusable. Staff finds that the proposed additions are appropriate in mass and scale. The sub-grade space will use the same foundation wall going down. On the north side of the building there is a light well proposed for the sub-grade space. Staff is suggesting restudying the light well so that it can be pushed over between the front edge o f the house on King Street. The total area increased is a little over 700 square feet. The first 330 is allowed and the 378 remaining is part of the bonus request. The majority ofthe bonus is for an area above the garage, a green roo f deck expansion. The use o f the flatter roofs allows for the historic resource to maintain its prominence. Staff is recommending approval o f the front yard variance of six feet for sub-grade space. Restudy the location ofthe north light well. HPC grant 378 square foot area bonus. Steve Wilson, architect said we have come a long way since our last meeting. Nothing has changed about the entry but we would like to add a picket fence so the dogs don't run out on the Neale Avenue. Everything that is proposed new is inside the setback. Putting a lawn over the garage allows for a walkout condition. We are proposing a snowmelting pervious paving system. We are removing a covered porch and letting it walk out to grade. Most of the addition has been remove below grade. On the existing house the corner is somewhat lost and we will bring that back so you can have a full volume of the historic house. The driveway will come around the house not from the street. On the north side o f the house concerning the light well we tried to get it behind something that was a building. Jane asked about the fence and what would be appropriate for final. 8 4 '. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2013 Chairperson, Ann Mullin opened the public comment portion o f the agenda item. There were no public comments. The public comment portion ofthe agenda item was closed. Jamie complimented the applicant for getting the spirit of our code and saying that they respect the historic resource. The plan really respects the historic resource. The front yard variance is OK. I am fine with the light well the way it is and the 378 square foot bonus. Nora said this is a great project and I support it. Sallie said she agreed with the 378 square foot bonus. Jamie said she would give the 500 square foot bonus as long as the plans didn't change. Jay congratulated the applicant for his design and keeping it below the grade ofthe historic house. Patrick said he appreciates that most of the square footage is subgrade. MOTION: Jay moved to approve resolution #8 and striking #2 and changing the square footage of #3 to 400 square feet so i f there is any miscalculations we won't have to see the application again. Motion second by Ann. Motion carried 7-0. Roll call vote: Patrick, yes; Jay, yes; Jane, yes; Sallie, yes; Jamie, yes; Nora, yes; Ann, yes. MOTION: Jay moved to adjourn second by Ann. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. 244,1---td-/ c .Lk., 1«-4 Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 9 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Justin Barker, City Planner RE: 114 Neale Avenue- Conceptual Major Development and Variances, Public Hearing DATE: March 20,2013 SUMMARY: 114 Neale Avenue is a - " v 56 I 941 9/k . 9~ ,*. 0, .* landmark designated 6 001 square foot , i lot that contains a historic Victorian 404@:7*11„ju, 4*44 miner's cottage and a non-historic [29 0-"- .'*ifi~- -=DE-.9- .. - U contemporary rear addition. -I.ail..%61.·2: t.** 1, property was created as a result of a -ip--* '34. *--4' .4.-/ %- - Historic Landmark Lot Split in 1998. f~~5#, 4. 0;4*-4 ,-4'·AL*'- -'*- -4.G~!1 € The applicant requests HPC approval ~Ip---,~~---~-9,---7-2~,~-~44&-4&'~,f4~£141*47 to remodel and expand the rear 7~ I -- , . ,~ Ag,59'~~1~.-*."~'~-4 -1 addition, adding a garage and a *79.1 - t . subgrade living space. The proposed 10- -1,1,7* 1,;¢4 -6,.4,00.- - ..,4,4.....4¥%,i- i subgrade walls are located inthe front ~ - '5>t'--:2- /V#€7 1,¥) 26.-'-*-1.c-··-***A yard setback and require variance approval. 4:32 59 *-,tk ifprE---~1:?f!€1* .--96 - ;f. , i '- M Additionally, the proposed expansion causes the project to exceed the allowable floor area of 1,345 square feet. The applicant is requesting HPC approve a 500 square foot floor area bonus. APPLICANT: DWS Family Trust, 3 Remington Lane, Houston TX 77005, represented by Forum Phi Architecture. ADDRESS: 114 Neale Ave, Lot 1,114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split Subdivision. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-83-001. ZONING: R-15A (Moderate Density Residential). CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a 1 recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shal[ be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Conceptual review focuses on the height, scale, massing and proportions of a proposal. The relevant design guidelines are attached as "Exhibit A." Overall, staff is in support of the project. The proposal is clearly intended as secondary to the historic building and is generally compliant with the applicable guidelines. The subject property was created through a Historic Landmark Lot Split approved by City Council in 1998. The historic structure was originally located down the hill and relocated on the newly created 6,001 square foot lot. The Council ordinance specified a maximum allowable floor area of 1,345 square feet (plus the potential for a 500 square foot floor area bonus if granted by HPC) for the property. A modern addition was constructed to the rear of the cottage. In 2007, HPC granted Final Major Development approval for the construction of a garage on the south side of the property and expansion of the modern addition. The approved project was never developed. Massing and Proportions Most of the proposed development will barely be visible from the street. The most visible change will be the remodel of the existing one-story addition to the north. The proposed remodel simplifies the mass and further separates it from the historic building. The other changes are either subgrade or set back significantly from the street and screened by a mature tree line. These include construction of a subgrade living space, expansion of both floors of the existing addition to the south and expansion of the existing lower level to the south for a two- car garage. Typically, additions should be set back from the primary fagade a minimum of 10 feet. The proposed garage is located less than 10 feet from the Neale Street faQade. However, since the garage is mostly located below grade, it does not compete with the historic fa~ade and does not alter the original proportions. Requiring the full 10 foot setback would eliminate one of the garage parking spaces or force the rear addition living space to be impractical in size. The main floor 2 additions are simple geometric forms, angled from the historic structure and aligned parallel to the east property line. Staff finds the proposed additions are acceptable and compliant with the following guidelines: 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. u An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also in inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. u An addition that covers historically significant features in inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. 3 A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. u Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. u Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. u Set back an addition from primary faeades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. u For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. o The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. The proposed subgrade living space walls will align with the existing historic house foundations in the front yard. These are located within the front yard setback by about 6' and require variance approval from HPC. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. 3 The historic building was placed within the setback when it was relocated and the proposed construction does not increase the non-conformity. Staff supports the requested front yard variance for subgrade construction. On the north side of the building is a proposed lightwell for the subgrade and lower levels. The residential design guidelines require all lightwells on the street-facing *ade(s) of a building shall be entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building. Staff recommends restudying the location of the lightwell, particularly looking at the recessed area between the historic building and the proposed addition. The total floor area being added is 708 square feet. The first 330 square feet of that is within the allowable floor area; the remaining 378 square feet is requested in a 500 square foot bonus. The majority of the bonus necessary for the proposal (336 square feet) call be attributed to the space on top of the garage being used as a "green roof'deck expansion from the existing main level deck. The review criteria for HPC in determining approval for floor area bonus is Land Use Code Section 26.415.110.F. Floor area bonus: 1. In selected circumstances, the HPC may grant up to five hundred (500) additional square feet of allowable floor area for projects involving designated historic properties. To be considered for the bonus, it must be demonstrated that: a) The design of the project meets all applicable design guidelines; b) The historic building is the key element of the property and the addition is incorporated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building; c) The work restores the existing portion ofthe building to its historic appearance; d) The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's form, materials or openings; e) The construction materials are of the highest quality; f) An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions of the building; g) The project retains a historic outbuilding; and/or h) Notable historic site and landscape features are retained. 2. Granting of additional allowable floor area is not a matter of right but is contingent upon the sole discretion of the HPC and the Commission's assessments of the merits of the proposed project and its ability to demonstrate exemplary historic preservation practices. Projects that demonstrate multiple elements described above will have a greater likelihood of being awarded additional floor area. The proposal would almost be within the allowable floor area if the deck is not included, but the applicant is choosing to make functional use of the space that would otherwise be a garage roof. Staff recommends approving a 378 square foot floor area bonus for this proposal, which would be the minimum amount required to complete the proposal. Height and Scale The historic building has gable roofs, while the proposed additions have low-sloped shed roofs. The relevant guidelines state: 4 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. o Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. o Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. The use of flatter roofs allow the additions to be lower than the historic building and diminish the effect of the additions. The proposed roof type also distinguishes the separation between the historic building and the additions. Even though the roof forms are different than the historic building, staff finds the proposed roofs allow the historic building to maintain prominence and are acceptable. The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant Conceptual Major Development approval with the following conditions: l. HPC grant a front yard variance of 6 feet for the subgrade space. 2. Applicant must restudy the location of the north lightwell. 3. HPC grant a 378 square foot floor area bonus. 4. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. Exhibits: A. Relevant Guidelines B. Application Exhibit A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 26.410.040.D.4. Lightwells. All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street-facing facade(s) of a building shall be entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building. 5 f HPC GUIDELINES New Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. 3 An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also in inappropriate. 1 An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation ofthe primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features in inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street. o Some roof lines and porch eaves on historic buildings in the area may align at approximately the same height. An addition should not be placed in a location where these relationships would be altered or obscured. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. u An addition that is lower than or similar to the height ofthe primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. 3 A 1-story connector is preferred. 3 The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. 1 The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. u Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. 61 Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. 3 Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. o Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. o The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 6 RECEIVED JAN 0 9 2013 Iff . 1% m il ( CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 TO Chris Bendon, Community Development Director & HPC FROM: Forum Phi Architecture RE 114 Neale DATE January 9, 2013 Dear Director, Forum Phi requests your approval of an Historic Preservation Land Use Application for Major Development (Conceptual) Review for our project at 114 Neale Avenue. The subject property is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. Existing conditions on the property consist of a single family residence comprised of the historic resource, an 1 880's miner's cabin which has an existing 'modern" addition from 1998. Our proposal consists of an expansion and reconfiguration of the existing "modern" addition, expansion of the non-historic portion of the structure below grade, the addition of a garage partially below grade, and finally a planted grass roof deck over the garage. This project redevelops the previous additions to reduce the amount of new construction which interacts with the historic resource and even restores elements of its structure. The expansion of the existing addition makes use of its off-axis orientation to help distinguish the original structure from the new. The floor of the proposed addition steps down, allowing the new roof to be lower and making the new addition feel more subordinate to the historic resource. In order to include a garage, the driveway utilizes the natural slope of the rear portion of the site. The garage has no visible connections to the historic resource. Above the garage is a walkable grass roof deck which restores the cabin's original relationship to a flatter grade prior to being moved up the hill. The expansion of this deck causes the project to exceed its allowable floor area, so we must request HPC to exercise its authority to grant a 500 square foot floor area bonus. The original miner's cabin was built c.1880 and has since received multiple land use decisions (see attached). In 1998, the parcel was granted a Historic Landmark Lot Split. The cabin was moved up the hill and a modern addition was approved and completed. In 2006 and 2007 HPC approved with conditions applications for Major Development (Conceptual) and Major Development (Final) with a variance from the Residential Design Standards for the addition of a detached garage and an expansion of the modern addition. Neither portion of this project was ever realized. This Land Use Application is complete per Major Development (Conceptual) Requirements listed in the City of Aspen Community Development Department's Historic Preservation Application Package. As requested, compliance with relevant City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and verification of compliance with City of Aspen Residential Design Standards is addressed in the attached pages. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA, Partner -f, ah & .li 1 + Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 114 Neale Avenue Major Development Review (Conceptual) RDS Compliance 26.410.040 A. Site design 1. The street-facing facade of the existing principal structure is parallel to the street. 2. The entire front facade exists non-conforming inside the front yard setback line. 3. The proposed fence is 30" high. B. Building form 1. The site is located outside of the Aspen Infill Area, so a secondary mass is not required. C. Parking, garages and carports 1. Access from private road or alley. N/A 2. Access from public street. The site is accessed from a side public street and there are no street-facing garage facades. The driveway cut within the setback will not exceed the existing condition. The vehicular entrance with of the proposed garage is less than 24' D. Building elements 1. Street Oriented Entrance and Principal Window. Existing to remain unchanged. 2. First Story Element. Existing to remain unchanged. 3. Windows. No windows are proposed to span between 9' and 12' above the finished first floor. No non-orthagonal windows are proposed. 4. Lightwells. All lightwells are entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building. E. Context 1. Materials. The quality, details, and application of exterior materials are consistent on all sides of the building, are not highly reflective, and are used in ways that are true to their characteristics. 2. Inflection. N/A 96.e Itt %, I lic r f f Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 114 Neale Avenue HPC Major Development Review (Conceptual) City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Compliance Introduction The property at 114 Neale Avenue is listed in the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. As required for submittal, this letter of compliance is for HPC Conceptual Review. Streetscape and Lot Features This project received a historic lot split in 1990 when the historic structure was relocated from 17 Queen Street to 114 Neale Avenue. Due to this relocation, the site does not retain its original historic landscaping elements. A tree removal permit application from the Parks Department has been completed for the removal of several trees along the east side of the property. Please see attached Forum Phi to Amy Guthrie. A total of three fences currently exist on the property, but are not historic. A new wood picket fence is proposed in front of the building. This fence is to be low to the ground, transparent in nature, and within the historic character of a miner's cottage fence. A privacy fence not to exceed six feet will be erected to replace the existing fence at the east side yard along the driveway. An existing privacy fence will remain at the south side of the property and the short length of fence on the west side will be removed. The site does not have any original or historic retaining walls, as the historic structure was relocated following the historic lot split. Proposed retaining walls will only be used to retain earth where necessary. The existing walkway to the historic structure is offcenter and somewhat meandering. If any changes are to be made, the proposed walkway would be perpendicular to the street and front entry, returning the design to a historic semi-public experience. This new walkway would be concrete or sandstone materials. Due to the historic lot split, the site does not currently retain its original historic context or historically significant landscape features. Additions to the landscape will be consistent with historic landscaping of historic Aspen and will have minimal impact on the historic structure. Any proposed site lighting will be located to minimize the visual impacts onto adjacent properties. An existing ditch is culverted and will remain in its current location at the north side of the property. It is currently crossed by a gravel drive and a proposed driveway will remain in this location, as approved by the City of Aspen Engineering Department. Historic Building Materials The primary historic building material consists of horizontal clapboard wood siding. The siding has been well maintained and remains intact. Any areas requiring repair or maintenance will be done in place. A portion of the historic structure will be reconstructed following the removal of a previous addition and will maintain the historic character of the original structure. A portion of wall will be replaced to match the wood clapboard siding of the historic structure. Any replacements will match original materials and synthetic materials will not be used. Original materials will not be covered by any new materials. Any and all previous covering materials will be removed and the original historic structure will be repaired where required. The historic structure will be repainted in a compatible manner following proper preparation. Refer to the General Guidelines section for additional paint description. The historic structure does not contain any masonry materials. Windows All windows on the historic structure maintain the original historic character, although several windows were previously replaced. The existing windows will remain unchanged and will receive proper maintenance where required. These windows are single hung type with distinctive surrounding casings and sills. All windows on the historic structure will receive repairs where required, with no changes to the character-defining features. Replacement windows are not anticipated for this project. If required, any replacements will preserve the historic character of openings, design, materials, size and proportion, and profile. Storm windows may be installed to enhance energy performance of the historic structure, but have not been proposed at this early phase in design. Doors The historic structure has two remaining historic glass panel doors, at the primary street-facing entry as well as a secondary entry on the south facade, These doors will be maintained in order to preserve integrity, function, size, appearance, design and color. The historic doors will not be replaced and storm doors are not proposed at this time. Porches The primary porch on the front facade is historic and will remain and be maintained. Any required repairs will be sensitive to the original design, proportions, and materials. Architectural Details Distinct architectural details exist on the historic structure, specifically the porch columns and large bay window on the south facade. These details represent those typical of the mining period and will be maintained and repaired only where required. Any repairs and/or replacements will be documented prior to submission of a building permit and construction. Roofs The existing shake shingle roof has been previously replaced to match the character of the historic structure. The existing roof maintains the original form, eave depths, and chimney. Skylights, rooftop devices, or other additions have not been previously added to the historic structure. The proposed design does not include such features. The materials of the existing roof are in character with the original design and will not be removed or replaced, except where necessary, Secondary Structures The property does not contain any historically significant secondary structures. Building Relocation & Foundations The historic structure was relocated in 1998 after a historic lot split. During this relocation, the foundation was rebuilt in to accommodate a lower level under the historic structure. This foundation is poured concrete and does not likely match the character of the original foundation. The 1998 foundation will remain and in some areas be reconstructed or repaired to support the proposed addition. Three proposed light wells will be added for egress to the below-grade living spaces and will be located behind the street-facing facade. Building Additions In 1998, an addition was constructed while preserving the character of the historic structure. This addition has no historic significance and will be removed. However, the linking elements to the historic structure will remain as connection for the proposed addition. The proposed addition has been designed such that the character of the historic structure is maintained, even improved. The proposed addition, an angled bar following the east setback boundary, is designed to be recognized as a product of its own time. The style of the proposed addition is modern and will be located at the rear of the historic structure, with minimal visibility from the street-facing facade. It is distinguishable from the historic structure, with materials of concrete, steel, and glass. The shed roof of the proposed addition is designed at a slightly lower elevation than the historic structure and will not interfere with the existing roof. All portions of the addition will be located behind the primary street-facing setback. Most of the new floor area will be located subgrade. The proposed floor area is approximately 1,714 square feet. This exceeds the maximum allowable FAR for the parcel (1,345 square feet). However, the project is requesting a 500 square foot floor area bonus to be granted by the Historic Preservation Commission. With the bonus floor area, the maximum allowable for the parcel will total 1,845 square feet. This project is not within the Main Street Historic District nor the Commercial Core Historic District, and does not involve a new primary structure on a historic parcel. General Guidelines The historic structure is currently coordinated in one overall color scheme with several accents at windows and columns, however does not likely match the original condition. The original color will be researched and all attempts will be made to return the historic portion to its original. Any new color schemes chosen for the historic structure will be simple, coordinated, and consistent with the character of a miner's cottage. The proposed addition will also be coordinated with the historic scheme, while remaining distinguishable in color and material. Exterior lighting has not been completely developed at the conceptual level, but will be simple in form and detail. Existing lights on the historic structure will remain. Any proposed site lighting will be shielded and/or low intensity. Visual impacts from interior lighting will be subdued. The surface of the historic structure will be maintained, repaired, and cleaned where necessary. The methods used will be low impact and follow the recommendations of the preservation design guidelines. Any repainting methods will be planned carefully. Mechanical and service areas will be located and relocated within and without the proposed addition. All service areas will be visually blocked from the primary street facade. All facades of the historic structure will remain free of mechanical and service equipment. This proposal rectifies an existing undesirable condition. The proposed driveway will be accessed from the existing curb cut on King Street. This driveway exists as a short gravel drive. It will be paved and extended along the east side of the property. A small parking area will be maintained where the existing gravel drive is located. It will be screened by landscaping from the primary building facade. Although the proposed garage is attached to the addition, it faces south and will not be visible from the primary street-facing west facade. The project is a single-family residence and will not utilize any signage. An existing sign will remain located on the front facade indicating the project is listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures. ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: 114 Neale Location: 114 Neale Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 1 - 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split (Indicate street address. lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2737 073 83 001 APPI.1(LANT: Name: DWS Family Trust Address: 3 Remington Lane, Houston, TX 77005 Phone #: (713) 677-3265 Fax#: E-mail: don@brandvita.com REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Steev Wilson Address: Forum Phi, 117 S Spring St, Ste 202, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: (970) 279-4109 Fax#: (866) 770-5585 E-mai 1 : swilson@forumphi.com T) PIE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): El Historic Designation U Relocation (temporary. on 01 Certificate of No Negative Effect L] or off-site) L] Certificate 01 Appropriateness Ed Demolition (total demolition) -Minor Historic Development 01 Historic Landmark Lot Spl it -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings. uses. previous approvals. etc.) Single Family Residence - Historic Miner's Cabin with modern addition. See previous approvals attached. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings. uses, modifications, etc.) Single Family Residence - expansion of modern addition, addition of garage and basement level Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements. Updated: May 29.2007 EE® El General Information Plea.se check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This infi,rmation will help us review your plcins and, if~necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO ® El Does the work you are planning include exterior work: including additions. demolitions new construction. remodeling. rehabilitation or restoration? x [3 Does the work you are planning include interior work: including remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? Ix] Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? Ix In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit. are you seeking to meet the Secretarv of the Interior's Standards ®r Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? L] H If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible, Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) [_] El Ifyes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: I Rehabilitation Loan Fund L] Conservation Easement Program E Dimensional Variances Id Increased Density H Historic Landmark Lot Spl i t [-1 Wai ver of Park Dedication Fees [3 Conditional Uses L 1 Exemption from Growth Management Quota System [f] Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29.2007 ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: 114 Neale Applicant: DWS Family Trust Project Location: 114 Neale Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 Zone District: R-15A Lot Size: 6001 SF Lot Area: see Ord. 16 (1998) and Bret Theony to Chris Bendon attached (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area. Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark. easements. and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area iii the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: n/a Prol)(,Ned: n/a Number ofresidential units: Existing.' 1 Proposed. no change Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3 Proposed: 5 Proposed %0 of demolition: 37 DIMENSIONS: (write rda where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing. 1014 Allowable: 1345+500 Proposed: 1713 Height Principal Bldg.: Existing,· 20 Allowable: 25 Proposed: 22 Accessory Bldg.: Existing: n/a Allowable 25 Proposed: n/a On-Site parking: Existing.· 0 Required: 2 Proposed: 2 % Site coverage: Existing.' Required: n/a Proposed: % Open Space: Existing.* Required: n/a Proposed. Front Setback: Existing: 14 Required: 25 Proposed: 19 Rear Setback: Existing.· 10 Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E. W Existing: Required: n/a Proposed: Side Setback: N Existing.· 10 Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Side Setback: S Existing: 10 Required: 10 Proposed: 10 Combined Sides: Existing: Required: n/a Proposed. Distance between Existing: n/a Required: 10 Proposed: n/a buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: A portion of the existing Historic Resource and Lower Level below exists inside the front yard setback. We are not aware that any encroachment licenses have been issued. Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): Front Yard Setback variance. Proposed basement walls align below existing foundation walls, which are inside the front yard setback. Proposed required lightwell conforms with RDS, but is inside the front yard setback. Proposal does not worsen existing non-conforming condition. Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requireinents, Updated: May 29,2007 BEATON GLENN K BLEEKER STREET REV TRUST BRIEN ALICE 936 KING ST 32 TULIP ST 110 NEALE AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 SUMMIT, NJ 07901 ASPEN, CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN DECRAY MARCELLA TRUST 50% FUENTE DAVID & SHEILA ATTN FINANCE DEPT DECRAY MARCELLA PROPERTY TRUST 701 TERN POINT CIR 130 S GALENA ST 50% BOCA RATON, FL 33431 ASPEN, CO 81611 30 COMMONWEALTH AVE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118 GIRVIN LINDA A GREENWOOD WILLIAM S GUPTA BENJAMIN K REV LIV TRST 2010 414 N MILL ST PO BOX 4778 9017 GREENSBORO LN ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LAS VEGAS, NV 89134 HATANAKA HOWARD I ISAAC THOMAS D REV TRST KAPPELIERNST 980 KING ST 975 KING ST PO BOX 1962 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 KASABACH JACQUELYN A LANG DONALD W LAWRENCE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 4166 PO BOX 4166 8560 RUETTE MONTE CARLO ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 LIPSEY WILLIAM S LOEWENSTERN CAROL TRUST MAPLE CHARLES A & BRYCE M 955 KING ST 910 GIBSON AVE 927 GIBSON AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MARZIALE ANTONIO MEADOWS JEAN R & STANLEY H MICKEY JAMES & MARLENE 5134 TANGLE LN 538 HILLSIDE DR 931 GIBSON AVE HOUSTON, TX 77056 HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035 ASPEN, CO 81611 MORRIS JAMES/BYARD ANNE TRUST MORSE JAMES A TRUST PARRY SUSAN LYNN 860 GIBSON AVE 800 E ELLIS RD PO BOX 2529 ASPEN, CO 81611 NORTON SHORES, MI 49441-5622 ASPEN, CO 81612 RIVER HOUSE LLC SHOAF JEFFREY S SKOKOS THEODORE C & SHANNON B 28 W GRAND AVE PO BOX 3123 PO BOX 17330 MONTVALE, NJ 07645 ASPEN, CO 81612 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72222 SNOW ORCHID LLC VARE DARLENE DESEDLE TRUST WEISMAN FAMILY LP 1125 SAN MATEO DR 1024 19TH ST #7 2708 IRVING AVE SOUTH MENLO PARK, CA 94025 SANTA MONICA, CA 90403 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55406 Bret Thoeny 114 Neale Ave Aspen, Colorado 81611 bret@boto.com April 15,2012 Chris Bendon CITY OF ASPEN Re: 114 Neale St. Chris, Tim Semrau and I are working on doing an addition for my house at 114 Neale Ave. The site historically had slopes over 20% along the northeastern corner of the Property, a 1991 redevelopment resulted in significant re-grading to create a "platform" for the relocated Victorian house. The grading around the base of the platform includes 20-30% slopes, but these are man-made. The areas of steep slope that appear on the most recent survey do not match the historic contours. We are requesting that no slope reduction take place for the existing conditions. Please review the attached surveys and proposed plans. If you agree please sign this letter below so Amy can proceed with our application. Thank you for your help. Approvqi by. Bret Thoeny AIA Chris Bendon Ce. Amy Guthrie Enc. Survey & Proposed Plans IC< (f- > Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 MEMORANDUM TO: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Forum Phi Architecture RE 114 Neale Parks Opinion DATE: November 8,2012 Dear Amy, I met Chris Forman, City of Aspen Forester at the site this morning to discuss the possibility and probability of removing trees from the property as necessary for future approved development. Although we share his opinion that trees should not be removed carelessly, Chris is of the opinion that, based on location, size, grouping, health, and structural quality, there are no trees on the site that must be preserved. He reminded us that certain development proposals may jeopardize trees not intended to be removed and to be wary of removing trees that neighbors will object to due to, for example, views, other lines-of-sight, or rightful ownership issues. We understand that this is not an approved tree removal permit, but rather direction for further conversation regarding an appropriate site plan strategy. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA, Partner Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 MEMORANDUM TO Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Forum Phi Architecture RE 114 Neale Engineering Opinion DATE: November 8,2012 Dear Amy, We met Josh Rice, City of Aspen Engineer to discuss the placement of a new curb cut on Neale Avenue. Josh is of the opinion that, due to both high speeds and high accident incidence, the engineering department will not approve a curb cut on Neale Avenue. The department would prefer that the access remain on King Street. We understand that this is not an approval, but rather direction for an appropriate site plan strategy. Sincerely, Steev Wilson, AIA, Partner ·tr .1.4~613 ~--~4'-- , # 7,<.1«fl 4 +0 „ 7~ A \>S«U / -4/'SMUGGLER ST v 62*_gu99™All H E:i tz:~<~ f I19-- - nky<~ a iff)-2,7 1 \0 A-/2/R#gly 'ulln~* 9111 t,0 Dool i n. ihz::5~ i *-9 i,28,-a-#24 li.' 1 , U' l___-211:13 ,/0244 + 701*4$0&#,92'716. 2.2---4 tz=:Zle Fff'JOS ST .A '~6 4,+4\ tt . a Y?h *4641*<1;}2 PF o j lig , .--- - a.-w--L - .th Z..691 £/3 1-12~ ; t j-# im~y_*-4.31 9,2230 441 e W HALLAM ST, 1--li--LI-~ E HALLAM ST- '' 0 V % 48 y - l. 52.-t X ';941 ril . - 4.) ¥01>44 -6 0 0 8 eLEEKER SN , 1 1 EEKER ST '64 -4 ; a#6*49* s£2.1 j % i -~ prJf*- S\-f 41/44 4 /8/7 9 4 f00 9ri , it~=~ ti~ 1-= W .: At - tre=-1 } 93 Lb br L --F~~ 13!HI Diti . - ;,i-irF~9~1&£1623 cm . 21 ' ~44//1.A,* -=-U-,=.......__--U ...6 MA}14 SUZIE MAIN Er.~ZIZZ-Ir-f-l-t~LI-+-~ ZZ 1:9~&3-*..**~~~ if- ; 0-- r»«ta *ty-**ap 2 ' 1 4- .- r - f 1- / -~, 1 1.42 . +2 -- 1- 5 HOMONS AVE- 9 . O~ 1.-; / u=n- , bl i riAA ,+ A 1 't.-09 .C ~- '31 1,64*"4 °' l 4 Lfiftig t. , ? J 0 0 CJ- .. ritepaels.#~,%.Z I.- ftc Z - '3 0 40 NAVE---4-CoD' . (44 tr 0 P JL 0 . 1 1 8 U Lf:.j 9 £ 9+ z 0 9 I \ OAL S J LI~ 118&21 lulm 0 :-a 54 4 I L E $=va. -0 0 L 5, ~ t:, n m 1-4 1 - 04% , "00.=-1 r-F=912%=t re=4 1 7 . 40 ~ 1 1 0 ITT 1 1-A,.-4,ajN £ 1 1 f .4 L ...fl n 1 1 ff,nt 2 y COOPER AVE-6 COOPER AVE~Li' U - 6 COOPSR AVE liu- il,/' f 1 akr - '1,_f '27-- -U-1 4 -I---91 E DURANT AVE 2 0 0 t *·g= 0644 ST - -- DEAN,BI=f f . UAN.Std 88 0-1 -2--N ~D ST I /696//4€ '*- #bid.-,/A,$ 2212= 7:=PS, 4 -- . --/.21-./*;- 1=n...2/Ii-i.-.==I)~-* * --g==7FE32%12,9 -- IF -1 - 4 j -/1-1.. 4 .1,2...1 ..'.~\ .74' tr' L LIli liTTfm 944*4-1'Uf . -L,=i-i#4- =du: * r.~r"UT-Fri¥1 13:!,et- .2....6...2 - t.- *71 r -- ,=9 -=t = =2 - . , 1, 6%0111 Br r Z - .i*..b- -- 1 21 r-ly_ i P -- Ly - · - ---.-.-- --. -- _ -__ 1 1 11=11 : 1 + 4 i J.fittil I li 1-Irm- 4---- -- I ---- ,-1 lutt~t~~~ L--#... - · l... 1 --4.- \ // .. // 114 Neale Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - West Elevation 1 4 1\,4 111\ P t~ 5,~ . 461*~ A . 1 .1 *- ?3 '1 .17 f 33¢4- -33* v~ , » Jj /'rv 1 lED L.37--~' r - -«3 --IrridiA* J 3-9* 73aW#*trhilmL-UL> ·==4%5*AM/EMI!110/rrirmem 11•mr -·z-1.. -- 1 k. 9-5 - -- -- -- - --------4 ~ . ~~~~~ ~9€z~~·-2~~~rmIml~~41~, ~r ijlz, . %/I //// L. -- 611:7*8494 1--76421/tEL'q/"iDEA- -GO--4-4; 3 - 0 9- :==e«- ./ V -u=__2 & -=24'14» ~9#64*211'k*j~I~~#121$"ull#"62-42'#pk 4. -- $2* f - tt A- -- -a -=2==--4- -t-1 impy :1>4#bON,in/Milt - .:4:413%ilen@WE,/g&*2 p Ird-.r*k ..1-4~'63~ED€ *37*+4*i- . 111~Um#4502 1)liltill--1 6 Yv-- -7359·r - $ A -- -- / 402 5 r.» 'i 1 2 1 , h ./r 2.--1 \ Lri-..1 14 . . -1.ttlf-trl-t-ttlftirt '--.r/»:fl '12. / 4.4031*\ -- :11 2.33 1 ¢ 4 --, - 9- -- / . L - ' 2 .\ N...2 - 0 -- - k. k - A 1 7 i > -kill ... 114 Neale Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - West Elevation 2 12'\/1 /? -_ 242-4:321*c 2 01//1 111_1__--~__ ,>,fgfrfi- -U~~'rY *= -tnt -LT'Mt- - - =181•-re --· ->-4 2-- %9·UL·> - 24» u- -ELI+¢~1~~ir- 14/ ../ *P~ - - -/~ .- / ' -9- 3*1=*b Twri- ik -=-~-- «11 .-3----r - » L. /-·7- 14.0 '·/ -4<3lf-t~ =:39Uti.+~ -t-r= -51-42911 1.0..RTE,- - . + -SAW/- 3'- 4<33-1 ...c:E=-1 N' 34(~ 3-jmat*Ear- L),-Ettr- - ' Ulf.%9464 2 -u=r F- E-JITv----- --·,--1,1 «~.J--.-= ~ tr N N·t--1 1-NO~6- -- ~ ff ..1 *. al.Aj'Itt-~~lit443?~FU~~-~~~~-+42j--St~-- =a 1 . lati 411#917 aa,-mul,·14 Ill rd.s*1*AMA~.1#0114£326169£19152-jy~ -re--Ell.t· 1 #7 11#y.-~@SmmmImmflmil <6,=rs-- 1- -- 1 £ - =1.... .Anks#AluMEWSM#Fte#r- *-zzr- 1 -1 --- - -=1 - joII H,MmNMN,mALm,Hunw#ar Il J.1,1,I I " Illg Il .1 l iTI r il n 11 1 1 11 1 1111.Ull Il J H-111 f 1 7-7 7 4,4-*4-16U·U#*Ut-Ji -"1~ ILL 4 ~ |li ii li 1 4»42*; --243*7541--10 .. -'4 -:.2*,4 5 .h UP -7 -.2 h --N»=gu I ill,1/1~ r - =17¥ 923243<LI.»f 114-1.-'/V -,f:2~r ,~·4 ·-....-*-liu -2.-C -. / 29--- TA -.~ /--A l, h -/.% ' e--62.-1.--fvt-€0%1 6.h I--9~- L----\·· ··--~a€ -.4-3 -\ 725:I-=-34 1 2461 1.- 1%29: V 9 ... r-- 1241 -Af «trf-·-2 .-< I N ,~5- -- - A \ 1.-r - 1--1>93 -4.4 \ j - ' / \. i ;Ax 114 Neale Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - Neale Street View \\ t\\ -77 , 1 rIF~ V 11: ' t--01* · - - ' Cm. WHPR :8L---- - TOR 44 - 11 40 -+1 21 i ' -4*F-- 4 /1 .\ 4 844477~44 L- ,.t.wAll 1 , --- *2--·-· -- 4 ••4~~~i »42 461% A 9 ... k.-#;11 7/I 4; 1#/:12-2-fr32\<-\ 1.-- t--- - 1 c.of'... w- A-- »13-4,»k·- - -6~1~»- 909-ip *11.;44(4*-t) 1-41111 i~ - - - ~ --~-- -- \ *44'Rwhit--i \\ iII-1 -4 k --i \--- *Ppey* . 2'itti r 14- -1 0.- --21 , A 4 J L i Fam<'preftift lt-f . lf*Bl -.burl. ' 1 \ -2*? '7!>t·*-2.4·- J B r L .Vre<*h 469~,li<--~'~--#'.feN /t-, 2%-r* '21 7 J RE- i'.n~'tr- P€htt »f)4012->3. r...7 454,6 ; **Tfilid 'Tip#iliti~Fi_r _5.fi i p - 99' ,;'1<39 04 r·4· '*41* 10 :mubm# ' \ \ \ 1 T d..=11#1#E 14,#- an-·--~-- C . ~ ~ ~~~~~-~thfp--~-10>i--4*<> -13YISft@~~~~~~flliWWf~ ----- 1 ;\ 1 #,1,1# . ---- 114 Neale Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - Bird's Eye View Er %.-3411 l $'i , Ir j ;**** el$:2-\ 12- j /A 4- .- 11 1 11 Li =~00'rl~ --si~ l r--1 mmip i I --- r -- iminerM.#4"*4uW#"sulutLOUA11'jj'LLOAL;JLJLL1.kiLJ.,jll.~LJL ' '1 I.-' --1 1 ~L.- __take -.--L.WhiliA Ilimi'i 'F qi, 17 B 31 11 1 1 11 1 .4 . · :' r 4' r-ler-r--="d= B+ - ' ibki'~ 11 1 ji 1 j jl li |j j 111 N il f t' 1 '1 11 M i; i 4 1 .4 - - ---- .--1-.f *'ll't'41.14lk,/dhiUIU1 TNJ11111141111~-#+*~+41+4=14tdUL,lL.- 4 j -=ey'f€22- Il - ·41411131!Jjllif'Atill*'Ii,1.,i'*-p-il=M 1- - ---- - tjAAA Ju £ ii jt' A Wl 19.4 #019% /2 -1 - \L-L-Ll_ h \j --- ~©9 ILL I 47 I I \, U , 4 111 W k b ... 7+-- - 1 ---- L----i.i 'Zl tri.. // .--.---- .1 \ -11 -- 411:%-- *= :iI 1 1 ~114 . TY.1[ 4'v/ *144*%4~ 44 AV .-- -7 ~ "f,#. f~1 - * a fe" , 6 1 2 01 1 ,LI. ~ j 11 1111 & aH!lilli .1 1 1 > f> f\ .1 f01 *pht ez)+--1 '. ijjI+ I 4 irt irzl } 8 1 8 1~ i \..iL' [fl!~1 ~1~ 1 t j# 4 1 4 r- I + ~* 2 [ ~ B f i * = F 1~ 2- i f I ~ ~ - Ii i 1 4 - - 5-1 : . 1 ~, i f .--- ~~ •~ 'f ;~i1~ f f 1 =_ 1 1 1 1 11 :4 14 : 1 111 It 1 1 !11 1 1 tatt il " " '~ '~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i~| ~ ~~ ~ ~tt ~11 ~ 1; ~ 1~ 11 1 : 1 D d 1 , i [ 11 - 1 £ i .i _ - 9=11 Mtl##3 4 11 Jill' - 1 1 j H 41 13 11 ' 114 Neale Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - South Elevation AN 4 »5-3 1 -LL-C,-I 1 1 *C -Ii // I -*-»ffr - - 11 iff 11 Ill/ UL - - ··4 - 6-' F=* I i. 1 31ffil ! 27nflTE ; ij .E -485 A, ---4 ---=- U U-~---~111 " ' 1,4,111 Ii]15 'll I-iilil iliT / y ===4=4 --=---*~,bl \411.Ii-;I,a~~1~I~ *vb,inY#Arrr~~#i#Rk UfffgaL.p- ' i Il MI .U~ .i .1 or#.5232.WVa.4..4-*,/4.*...fl iy 1 -9..3*Tr,7- -1 . 23?35731<Ak*m '4 4, CI 11[ \22-7.**A T~-44.-4 Id 1 ]1 kli 111 411 /Gr NAL,~~ 1771-'' -7 . E 111 .//t 11 UL-u k I ji :/*r. *1 L iiI AN til L -·« r:' -4~ 0 L - i 01 i .1 -p N f T 1 4\~. 114 Neale Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - Mountain View ptiEE iii2 I: ' ' 4 , : ifee . 4 r , 'V, 221 £ 54 9 4% p 1, 4% 4 · ·t- · 4, '0'.... 7.42€~ ,,5 0. . ·..t'*,w. *··.. ..y .y - 3 'jk·f.... w . M . 't· ..... . 4 1 ..< '*4:945.i F'af~* ,1 4 /. r.fr 4 .*140,2 .~B#,•t *,72. 1*..S|k'N· ~•4'1'5.2,4 . -1„'. 910$4,4/Fl...- 2-' iF.™.=¥,44%~ 42 *7 .&' <*~'0*'t>~ 8~41.4.+4 'F,#.4"41' 3:J.: 6~*~, 424££,igi.#ge•e**tai· *·740. t'*~,<~ . y .26 0 f.,i,f,2.:&-r LI. 11;1, .,.40 v , ~. 2 t'1;9 I .1.1·4 *trit-* .~1.'1*19,1-i ·,:,.~*P'h -f~*~~47.114. 2 , 10' 1 . 179-:,;71 ..14,. .--ul . 7,3'i.. ALF:I·€ :' : 4 2~21 2·br·,17444. i -. . Alt ..21 :,1- :;. 1~4%2~ z-Ift....--*:~0$0.-; i.::i~~fri,*. ~».., 13ti. 4, Nrak .: I .. 11 mi 1111 .. T 4. 9 ...Al?~~~ JC{*439:f,!xs«*4'ity,- . mlmm mmitit, 1 u# i a"7<A.€.tm~~~. 1.4.11/2.11;_2!0 :fEK- -. 3%. 3. - ~ 7~ 716'"'. 2-'.·51,·i '.-.4+2~2; -1 1 ~ .IX * 4% 1,4,.#. · e·: --RK.3 F -824 . -1 %>46 i. 1 *f 11 I. ' , 1 '/ I -- 1 4 4* 1 ' D * 4, T 114 Neate Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - Material #1 Concrete Panel f..,t~ 13 ..ae F 1/6./ y„Ga, €.4 45- I 4 "lilli#4 9., T#*53 1 t I f*ht ·W:It , 49 -If 1-t, i * 1 d * 24 ' I J<·k *.* I. . 15- 2.- . 114 Neale Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - Material #2 Glass g.t-- r A ·- 7,4 9. I 1 1 ... 114 Neale Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - Material #3 Steel -11.41....Ill'll-%.'-V . 1.:-44 - . S 1 4 14 < -Ull %:7*L.¢' f:~* ,A - . - 7-M~~//~~J~ 4,2.46_4*#77/=I-:~ 0-I. '. *. 1 . ..t;*3" - - -»1-- ' * I ~....I".....'I.* . -~- - - ..2 - 1 . £ 34. -1=lu ' '-I P. *4*. *di.,8/·~,U 1. ,=P-,1 -·pl. ./. €-t~ 144/fill=.MAF~L- ..+4:. '11 114 Neale Avenue - HPC Conceptual Review - Material #4 Wood Screen A 1 ¢ a e A LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCR I eED B. 30• 4/1' *09. G 3· DIA. B.L.M. WASS CAP E.A.T. 11 Ii------1 O UTILITY BOX 1-------1 9 MAI'loUE '7§.34 h L-__---1 O 0 0 FENCEE 0 UTILITY POLE / DRAIN ® IATER VALVE 1 -10- 1 30.AND OVER , li.n.:*In.2/ i:J V <::·6~.p a St.RVEY CONTROL / /l \\ A\\*\ \ \ \ \ 0 10 20 27 FIRE HYDRANT TITLE INFORMATION FURNISIED BY /4 -/tibitiN le..ill \' DITED: MAY 6, 2002 ~EXI ~CO~CITIV/~~E, INC + " i c-- )ittti: ®bl i <I-// Fot»g) Ra 25947, FLUSH ~1 TH {m~DEE - TREE CAL I PER IMI NOES (F-CONI FER, D-DECIDUOUS, DL-DR I PLI NE ) IEEE LAYER t O ELEVAT I DNS BASED ON THE BENOMARK AT TIE SOUTHEST CORNER OF THE COURTHOUSE LA-. ELEVATION: 7906.67, CIT¥ GPS 1«*u€NT O 159 *. \~ ~~~ ~~43> 2+Ol F*:WAL.1.Li:rk,~1329OEE,93$&03~NE:mm i* -- tr~'.t.*,0<*~ \*:.fl- * DATE Al€ 4,1 987 THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY OUTSIDE OF TIE CITY OF ASPEN MJDFLM HAZARD 1 "ALK '··. Mmuk- - :447 AREA AS DEFIG BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, PROJECT IUIBER 1963. F 1 GLIE ES-15 •ATER Al€) SEIER LOCATED 1 N NEIL All KING STREET ALL OT+ER UTILITIES IN KING STREET il ' P). 6 / / 7925./1 6 .rf/8 JFTA / 6.\ * / -49·, F=A UTILITIES 4 : I *1:W- \ . 11 4 HOUSE . ;:61 : - Ss#ZLA'PA:M+ RECEPTION. NO 334183 f,Jm #:~:TNEE MEA 3,543 S.F. •/- I FOOT I,DE 2/ - . -1 ---:, Nl -- 0, 1 .2 /- 2.6 CITY OF ASPEN GPS f DIVE \ CONC. N 82/00 54-. 1430.13 - 7-F g. 71 4. i VICINITY MAP .2#. 1 i xt_--=a·: Bagalieal:h~-?· R L Ok 1 \Wt 2 8.001 SC. 1~ •6 · 0.138 ACRES - 2 8. 10·OL t..6- 7•.2*2# 1 jk~.7 »Qi>JUrd. 2 2 7-0 7/ . F *% STONE mic 1 /4 ENCRO~CHES ~ /4/In e & e 6·/ i /7: ~21&. 1~AZA•-F 23.?80* 0 9 5.11. J lu:,3 7-F 1 ./ 1:: 6.01 .. . f '5-bill A L ...,A,0- Eff CITY OF ASPEN GPS ~ ~ MOIUENT NO 4 6868 4 PARCEL 2 OF THE Bol»CARY AGREe,ENT PLAT nEREOF RECORDED I N 4 PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE~4iW12;22~. ColTY OF PITKIN. 0 . LOT 2 y .4, % e 2 ' F p CE'TIFICATION ~IW~M~0~1~~3 THAT 11€ PROPERTY DEESCR 1 BED HE~~ e .. BASED ON TIE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHO-. Al® NAT TINERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUM,ARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS. e EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UIE)ERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVE6ROUND EASEMENTS OR R le,TS Of= ;Y IN FIELD EV IDENCE OR KNO,N TO ,€ El«~ OF ClmB i?FiEAE*:AF:EikidE?~3t~I~~B!~N°:%:i: THAN I:IS.000 DATED:- JOHN M. HOIORTH P.L.S. 25947 40. ... e» 4 -* \ b. 1,6: 44 1% 4\4b DRI IE ENCROACES 96 .1400%47 »415...... ° .0,4/k \ 0°44 J' 1 PAVED DRIVE lf, IMPROVEMENT/TOPOGRAPHIC 44 SURVEY 4 \ \ OF NO 5 RE-BAR LOT 1 AS SHO- oN TIE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT Of 1,4 NEALE/17 OUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, accoidl, 10 8, Ple: :hmeof r,cordd M~, 29. 1991 i, PIc, Book 45 asao::s¥:ENT re:J=,0 AT PAGE 35 STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING: 0 138 ACRES •/·. 6,001 SO FT •/ HERRON PARK PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOU™ GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 5"95%.:'..6.-*.%.rm.J'-----%,M P./E/FAI (970] /25-38to Edi?,19,im=~x:e:IME#kir DATE JOB 04/12 22 I 29C •b. 'S . FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 KING STREET Aspen, Colorado 81611 P. (970) 279-4157 F. (866) 770-5585 e 114 NEALE EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT - Don & Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue -~D-- NEW CONCR~E WALK~ --\» ~ Aspen. Colorado 81611 \ ~LIGHT ~ LUTILiTIES \ TO BE \ \ 1 1---#452;Ze#ZTEE4/:6#E/ 19 WIDE DITCH EASEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE 9/11.«1-17--1 Off¢232»--*- EXISTING CULVERTED DITCH CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. · 1-7 · - 210 SOUTH GALENASTREET 117< 1%2 7\ i PROPOSED * ASPEN, COLORADO 51611 PARKING ~ # P· (970) 925-3816 F (970) 925-3816 v PROP 7- FENCE-, ---4-E~ - 11 i, \ CIVIL TED GEOTECH HP GEOTECH 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 ~ P (970) 9457988 F. (970) 045-8454 TBD STRUCTURAL toll 0.---t- I CONTRACTOR '4»l Lt=tiSED l,-0-- ~ PROPOSED T80 j FENCE il \\ 11-013 DATE OF PUBLICATION i - 1 -A \10lk . 1- SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT, REV. SETBACKS, TYP DRAWN BY: EAH PROJECT NO: 1211 21-1- --29\\ - COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC - PROPERTY UNE, TYP PUMP -' d HOUSE EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN SITE PLAN 1/8- = 1 '-Or SHEETTITLE AO.01 SITE PLAN >11VM 313hIONOD 9Nr°*3 3nN3AV 31V3N 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 FORUM PHI Aspen, Colorado 81611 P (970) 279-4157 F (866) 770-5585 114 NEALE Don & Ann Shon 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 GYM CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET BEDROOM SUITE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P· (970) 925-3816 F (970) 925-3816 CIVIL TBD GEOTECH HP GEOTECH r f, 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 F (970) 045-8454 P (970) 945-7988 STRUCTURAL TBD CONTRACTOR TBD MEDIAROOM 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION BEDROOM SUITE SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. PROJECT NO· 1211 DRAWN BY: EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI. LLC SUBGRADE 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEETTITLE Al.01 FLOOR PLANS FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81811 P. (970) 279-4157 F· (866) 770-5585 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 POWDER 01 CONSULTANTS GAME ROOM SURVEYOR & BAR AREA ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC, 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET BEDROOM SUITE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P (970) 925-3816 F. (970) 925-3816 CIVIL TBD GEOTECH HP GEOTECH 01\ 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 \ \ h GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 \\ P· (970) 945-7988 F (970) 045-8454 7 STRUCTURAL DOG WASH ~ TBD CONTRACTOR TBO OWNER'S GARAGE GARAGE , 5-11" , FC -------7 F<---- --- --1 1'10/2013 OA. OF PUBLICATION / 1 1 I //1 BEDROOM SUITE I / 1 \ / 1 \ / 1 . / ! 1 1 1 /. lili \1 \1 / I --7. 1.14' SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV 4 0 DRAWN BY: EAH PROJECT NO, 1211 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC B LOWER LEVEL 1/4" = 1 '-0" SHEETTITLE Al.02 FLOOR PLANS FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P· (970) 279-4157 F (866) 770-5585 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 C.A-11 Il STORAGE 11 \ KITCHEN ~ ~ 1, 1 1 1 11 0 . / 11 FIREPLACE 1 CONSULTANTS OVING ROOM ~~~~ SURVEYOR 11 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. i i 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET 11 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ~~ DECK I I p. (970) 925-3816 F (970) 925-3816 11 1 11 \ 11 1 11 11 ii t CIVIL- TBD 11 e DINING i i GEOTECH ' HP GEOTECH 1 6020 COUNTY ROAD 154 i ii DECK GLENWOOD SPRINGS~ CO 81601 ; P: (970) 945-7988 F (970) 045-8454 \ STRUCTURAL 4 \ 1 CONTRACTOR TBD GREEN ROOF \ _1 1/1/013 DA'rE OF PUBLICATION MASTER SUITE i SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. PROJECT NO 1211 DRAWN BY. EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC MAIN LEVEL 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET TITLE Al.03 FLOOR PLANS 4¢ FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P (970) 279-4157 F. (866) 770-5585 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 \ \31 \ \\ EXISTING -0-- SLOPE \\ - \\ 2 CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR M d ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. -tgre ii - 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P. (970) 925-3816 F (970) 925-3816 CIVIL ---- # TeD ~ , a HP GEOTECH \ ~ GEOTECH EXISTING H \ 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 SLOPE GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO 81601 #, R (970) 945-7988 F (970) 045-8454 \\\ STRUCTURAL \ \\ YBO 1 4 1 1 \\ 294\ CONTRACTOR TBD - \\ f\\4\\\4\\\41\\4\1 1 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION \ - SO 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. PROJECT NO: 1211 DRAWN BY: EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC ROOF 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEETTITLE Al.04 ROOF PLAN FORUM PHI IA 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen. Colorado 81611 P (970) 279-4157 F· (866) 770-5585 114 NEALE V Don & Ann Short : 114 Neale Avenue | --4-3 ___ -.4./4/Flik Aspen, Colorado 81611 U TE Ffir-1-1 1 U U U E · g -2, U Jublul -1 III .//I CONSULTANTS ' SURVEYOR ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS INC. 2.1 NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P (970) 925-3816 F (970) 925-3816 CIVIL TBD GEOTECH HP GEOTECH 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 P (970) 945-7988 F· (970) 045-8454 STRUCTURAL TBD BUILDING MATERIALS LEGEND 1. CONCRETE ..1.-1- 2. GLASS CONTRACTOR 3. STEEL | TBD 4. WOOD PANEL 5. EXISTING CLAPBOARD TO REMAIN 1/10~13 DATE OP PUBLICATION 1 I . 0 lu 0 1 SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. : I . 1 1 4.il=4-- , - PROJECT NO. 1211 DRAWN BY EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC -) 1.....X .14 r.---20%__ 21«_ 1 WEST 1/4" = l'-0 SHEETTITLE A2.01 ELEVATIONS . FORUM PHI .A ..rz12=4+, . 7 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P (970) 279-4157 E (866) 770-5585 i <-21-LI _ ~_{T- I i ' ~ 2141 1 \6:3721.-«Elf--4 Nx - =»-pu. 4: 417 114 NEALE Ii -2.-1--Al-/42.r 41 / \ 4 114 Neale Avenue I--3. Don & Ann Shor't - Aspen, Colorado 81611 n 1 21=771 [ 1 1 P b 1.... - 2. - -/ 2 CONSULTANTS -----1- f - - , ' ~ ~ . - SURVEYOR " , ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ~ ~ ~ ~ / ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 / - ~ P. (970) 925-3816 F: (970) 925-3818 CIVIL 4 SOUTH 1/4" = 1'-0" 4.1 SOUTH 1 /4" = 1'-0 TBD GEOTECH HP GEOTECH 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 P: (970) 945-7988 F (970) 045-8454 STRUCTURAL BUILDING MATERIALS LEGEND TBD 1, CONCRETE L 'I 2. GLASS CONTRACTOR 3. STEEL TBD ' - '-rzv=r~·U I 4. WOOD PANEL l 1 EDt// 5. EXISTING CLAPBOARD TO REMAIN .-.»t t ·.1 ' _' A'LT-J /, 3, I~ ~-1 ~\\ 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBUCAION L --- 1\ --2:'~0· +27/// 3 UUMUU *- --~ , 1 2, aff SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV, PROJECT NO. 1211 = DRAWN BY: EAH - - .//1944 1 f /// 41 9 f COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC x>»09€x>0341499 /4\73 /5<6\2 19/40/9, 3 EAST 1/4" = 1'-0 SHEETTITLE A2.02 ELEVATIONS D . 4 40. FORUM PHI 3. | 117 South Spring Street, Su Re 202 ' Aspen, Colorado 81611 i P (970) 279-4157 F (866) 770-5585 1 . 1, 1 f . I 5 1 4- - 9 114 NEALE 1 . 11 1 9 __ Don & Ann Shon 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 5 39~ .- -1 Ll CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P (970) 925-3816 F. (970) 925-3816 CIVIL TBD 8 SECTION 1/4. - 1'-0. GEOTECH HP GEOTECH BUILDING MATERIALS LEGEND 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 1 CONCRETE P· (970) 545.7988 F (970) 045-8454 1 1 5 EXISTING CLAPBOARD TO RENIAt 2. GLASS STRUCTURAL 3. STEEL TBO 4 WOOD PANEL CONTRACTOR TBD - 1 03 1,1-013 DATE OF PUBLICATION I " I D.: - 00 - / SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. 1/ PROJECT NO 1211 DRAWN BY EAH & I 7 1 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC -14.-1.1, 4 L,/ /th ,~ SHEET TITLE A3.01 A SECTION 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTIONS 8.%2 , . // 12-1" ~-E~EEE~p-- . I. ./ 1»~-0 1 5.~/ 17.1Slq R. r.- . .6--- Millimimillilli Lie11 ~ .1 6 - 6,00 ,A F lifil#grvIFI -1-Tivir:.1- , .1 1|250.- a - V ./."...... -- a..Ljil . 25-4 U 5,41 + G 17'-3" 4 6 26'4 L t'-* 6 11'-111 ,LI, 49·-7· L I. 17'-81' tt 12'-1" L 1 1 f tO 2 3. 4.5.6. 7 8. . 1. j FORUM PHI N 1,700.754 R 94/; 1 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen Colorado 81611 P (970) 279-4157 F (866) 770-5585 .. 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 2. 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 4 -0 3. 26'-0 SUBGRADE FAR 1/8 . = 1'-0. 8. CONSULTANTS U\ SURVEYOR 1 - ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS INC, 1 WISql 11.25*q R 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ~6~ · ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 4- |49.75,qng* --·:9~ 3-25·fe 1 1 5.23 4 R :.§ P· (970) 925-3816 „sq r b 1- " 4 229.75,4 R 111.00,q I //////////////7 504.25*R -- f 130.504 q 2 F (970) 925-3818 CIVIL 1,198.50" R TBO J. 25'-4,1 L ~L h .....1... - 4 7-3 I . 46 25'-0' 11:-11 "1 ,-6 49-7· Lt-----12-1*,~r 1 9 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 2 7. 4 GEOTECH 4, 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 HP GEOTECH 4 /- P: (9703 945-7988 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 F (970) 045-8454 STRUCTURAL TBD 49.75 •q R CONTRACTOR 1 I 11 A 1 1/.1./ TBD \11/ 4-U - a 26'-0" . TA 4. 5. 1 6. k 1/10~2013 DATE OFPUBLICATION 114 Neale Floor Area Calculations LOWER LEVEL FAR 1/8 „ = 11-0,1 Zoning R.15A Exis#ng Dev,lopment Single Family Re/dinci Subgrad, Subgr/0 37.42 Propos,d 0,/lopment SIngli Famlly R,»idince Lower L,vel 238 99 to,- li/ 396.82 NmLotA- 8,001 -In Lmt 77675 M,in Liv*1 953.5 1 \2£ Upper L.* 1 Oros'Lot/u 8,001 Upper LIvel Allovable'loor . So 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. (124 875 'q ft Includ~d 2f Ar.. 1,345 0./. 0.1.9. Inlowiri-./ 1: 1 963.50,q fl • PROJECT NO 1211 Allowable Exempt 201 75 Deck~/Porch D,cks/Porch 338 --7 Dick DRAWN BY EAH R,queitlofFI- B A....... 500 INal 1.911./i/gin. Ig&,1 1122.il=.1 IE COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC Allow"•Floor Ar- A.. R.-ited Bonus 1,846 k'Lt LE'Inin.188 hlilleinalitiAE A) The 0/ inclu" 20-3096 */1 butt"care men·madi inddo not match h"Mccontour, A) Th, 'MIWIN·30% ,00- but m- ira man.mace and do not match hletorle cor,tour, 1 0 r,qu- ha~ been made thmt ex,~ting/ope condlbon' 00 not 'duce the Net Lot Al,1 * Groes Lot A- A „quest h~, b.«, m.de that miling '10. cond,tlen~ do nct *uce t. N. Lot Area lrom ... Lot A- J 8) The*b,allm.han'.lare.,i,ncludedat 100% e}Th,«©c.....i.Ii-,einctudedit 100. C) St- oount on lower Iwel per 28 575 020 0 2 C) Slall count on Subgrade arld Lo,•er L,# -205750200 2 D) Lo-r level Moor ..to count bmied on % oball expoeul - 2857502008 D) Suber- I r,0 Lo- 1811 noo, ar.i to count bmied on % 01 wall .po.wre, per 26 576 020 0 8 Lower I....1 228 25. ' of total lial! afea. with 330. I of. ed./1 8-, or 26 9% Sum/-1,-1-159,4. I oftclat-Ilce. w,1,~355/ n 'expo,edwallarea. or 22% Therefo,theamounlof counte/•lowerlevel floor 'rea ,~2389894 n (269% *881 25/ fl of noora-} Th,refor». the amount ~ countable,UN facien= irea m 37 A2 Iq R (2 2% * 1 700 75 ~ 1, of 0,066 noor afea) E) The 59 w R front porch (10 9 5' x 5'.5 5 ) le within 30 inches of linmhed grade and I. ex,m' .m noor E) Loi,i,er 1~08[ I'- 1 86,1. M oft,tal wall mr- with 498 25,q It o~ expo,ed wall area, or 29 94% 2/9, F 28575020/5 Th, Gil,go NG@ 75 gro= M ft Thi counted Moor am added to 01 lower levil for the girage is 124 875 . n SHEETTITLE P) Th, 90. I main leal deck i... than 15% I tne proper» m.,mon allowable noor ares and i' *.* ·250•24@75. M /2•124975. M).-26575020/7 th'.fore .empt from floof area per 26 575 020 D 4 Th,relor' me.mountofooult'blelc-rl'lor....39562/ ft [299496. 1,321 375. n 7-1- (1,1985 A 11 • 124875 A n = 1,321 375) / groas Moor areal : 1. - AT 1 F) The 50* R froM pofch (10•-9 5· x 5'-5 5·) 1§ within 30 Inches offlnihed grade and Ismempt from floor - ~PE=liz~„-, i· 1~ b.~J, 1 -*- per 25 575 C20 D.5 S) Themileldeck/537 75 sq n Aner appiy,ng the alkmabie exemption for decke (201 75. /1 ZO.07 the count,bi, d,ck ars, 1 338 sq It. (537.75 39 R .201 75 sq R.), per26.575,020.D.4. ~ r. k-4 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS MAIN LEVEL FAR 1/8" = 1'-0 r / EXHIBI AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE ( -I-- ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 11 4 N €ole_ A--z- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Harth ·20+4~ 161€¢1 @ .6:on'Al , 2013- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, «-6~l ~CO'»1 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 1/~ publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the o-wners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 4- day ~ of Mgroh 4 , 2013 by /4-VA) -£*l Er,3\2-9 0'·!fly..?85,/ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL *i .0 BONNIE L. ®: My commission expires: \01 gol / 1% WAECHTLER; ·'19 ~. n n 'w L (»3(x© c &141-0 p- e OF CC~1 Notary Public My Com,r'q<,o,t Exoires 10/30/2013 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: * COPY OF THE PUBLICATION * PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) * LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL * APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS RE~UIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 Pg 9 2% 232%43*292302848gIBEZ 0 *aSEIZE*:€319.65.m-gao -> 0 7 .-8 2 0 2 . 0- -P I :-/12 2 g·: 1 1 = 202*=Re~~9Egam §(a : 8;58-E Lj~ g ~*%&& Im J C O m. I. I :Al #,3 E::856:2< 2 51 42 2*i; 2- egis gl# a ,·, m 2.2 2% R @ R, 8 augg *2== = kets=u:f:1~ Z,00- ®PC B :NFE:%.MZ.ge &334*2@/ i 3-6&2,2 9&#fle;m mirt m 9,422.a.afop"*62:22 ....... [1£8~68] Log E Uenuqed uo *Ple@M sew!1 ueds¥ 841 U, P 4s!1 uedsgo/4!0© aultin6·Awe 89, 84PnJ Jozl ·sn esno4~7 JS euelee ·S OE L 'tuatilve stsenbak os e lu MAJOR DEVELOPMENT A RE:114 NEALE AVENUE- ONCEPTU<AL uoiss:Ululo3 UO!*BAJaseid 3!J !unlilluoo uadsy Jo XI!O 84 PUBLIC NOTI aoeld 5 six een Historic Lot AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1 \4 NEALE ,A\)1=bjUE , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: MACC.Pr 2..O , 2015 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 6-rEE>J Wil.:6014 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Su, Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Sv Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials. which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the -S_ day of MASUJ\ . 20 \3, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. 364 Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community I)evelopment Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy offhe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. 5•- Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached. was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method ojpublic notification and a copy of any documentation thal 11'as presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) se Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot. new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title. or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. :64- kL- Signature The foregoing "A ffidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 6 day of /46€CH '101-3-,by =rEVE Aj M Wt L 501/) WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL TODD A LAY NOTARYPUBLIC My commissio,/expires: /-75 ·20/ 23~ STATE OF COLORADO 67 NOTARY ID 19994002103 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 25,2015 , Notary Public 0 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: •COPY OF THE PUBLICATION •PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 114 NEALE AVENUE- CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 20, 2013, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, City Hall. 130 S. Galena St„ Aspen to consider an application submitted by DWS Family Trust, 3 Remington Lane. Houston, TX, 77005, related to their property located at 114 Neale Avenue. Lot 1.114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split. City and Townsite of Aspen, CO, Parcel ID #2737-073-83-001. The applicant proposes to partially demolish a non-historic addition at the back of the existing Victorian house and replace it with a new addition. The applicant requests a front yard setback variance to maintain the existing placement of the house and to expand the basement. The applicant also requests a 500 square foot tloor area bonus. For further information. contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758. amy.guthrie@cityofaspen.com s/Ann Mullins Chair, Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on February 28.2013 City of Aspen Account BEATON GLENN K BLEEKER STREET REV TRUST BRIEN ALICE 936 KI NG ST 32 TULIP ST 110 NEALE AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 SUMMIT, NJ 07901 ASPEN, CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN DECRAY MARCELLA TRUST 50% FUENTE DAVID & SHEILA ATTN FINANCE DEPT DECRAY MARCELLA PROPERTY TRUST 701 TERN POINT CIR 130 S GALENA ST 50% BOCA RATON, FL 33431 ASPEN, CO 81611 30 COMMONWEALTH AVE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94118 GIRVIN LINDA A GREENWOOD WILLIAM S GUPTA BENJAMIN K REV LIV TRST 2010 414 N MILL ST PO BOX 4778 9017 GREENSBORO LN ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LAS VEGAS, NV 89134 HATANAKA HOWARD I ISAAC THOMAS D REV TRST KAPPELIERNST 980 KING ST 975 KING ST PO BOX 1962 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 KASABACH JACQUELYN A LANG DONALD W LAWRENCE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 4166 PO BOX 4166 8560 RUETTE MONTE CARLO ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 LIPSEY WILLIAM S LOEWENSTERN CAROL TRUST MAPLE CHARLES A & BRYCE M 955 KING ST 910 GIBSON AVE 927 GIBSON AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MARZIALE ANTONIO MEADOWS JEAN R & STANLEY H MICKEY JAMES & MARLENE 5134 TANGLE LN 538 HILLSIDE DR 931 GIBSON AVE HOUSTON, TX 77056 HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035 ASPEN, CO 81611 MORRIS JAMES/BYARD ANNE TRUST MORSE JAMES A TRUST PARRY SUSAN LYNN 860 GIBSON AVE 800 E ELLIS RD PO BOX 2529 ASPEN, CO 81611 NORTON SHORES, MI 49441-5622 ASPEN, CO 81612 RIVER HOUSE LLC SHOAF JEFFREY S SKOKOS THEODORE C & SHANNON B 28 W GRAND AVE PO BOX 3123 PO BOX 17330 MONTVALE, NJ 07645 ASPEN, CO 81612 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72222 SNOW ORCHID LLC VARE DARLENE DESEDLE TRUST WEISMAN FAMILY LP 1125 SAN MATEO DR 1024 19TH ST #7 2708 IRVING AVE SOUTH MENLO PARK, CA 94025 SANTA MONICA, CA 90403 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55406 *•~•4~il~ 1 *4*- ¥ W• D-/ 1/.I= li ~1,4 ~' •- • -- * , W * =..4, 4 + 4 4%», a fl A ar *e 4 .3 C ki 7 it '1 - . L €, f 4 . 94 : 4 41 r wt VE#- .mt & .4 9 416*. la 1 1 . 1/4 .di?ti~ 7 \'llill J S POSTAGE . I t. -:.... 11.4 7 ' I .' 5 I.' PA *El 1* ' . L 1 =1 4 PUBLIC NOTICE' o 0 1. 1 1 , '2*{ f ' i : it *rf<: 1 Date : Wed , March 20, 2013 19 r , - ~ ....:. * 3 9+ 1 4 € 917 1 r I 1 i ~ Time: 5.00 pm rl 1 1. I .it at 4 ~ 11- AN ~ 1 21 , r,1 1*fty 1 Place: Council Chambers City ~ · 1 ./ 44 > f),t 4 3 t At f 46 * Hall,130 S. Galena Aspen * i 1 , e #,1 - 14 1, it 0 1 rt,y ~? Purpose: I I 4 1 4.14 9 ti,g-,0 1 HPC will conduct Conceptual review I €11 W . I t , , 4 4 4 ·'f ~'i,/ ¥ t .1 ~ of an application by the owner of this e& '4+1 - + t· € 4,9 4 4 fj & 1,23 1 ..f , r property. DWS Family Trust, 3 1 * /' 7/59 1 220: 1 *44 R. cit 5.9 . Remington Lane,Houston,TX, 77005, , f. 1 · jo proposes removal of non-histonc ift - ~ ,' 1. JY .4 3 . 'PE j. 4 1~ , Idditions at the back ofthe existing A. lin! iq# to be replaced with new - f &*3. A *4 . I ; I. %. '41 4 4 irtion, including a 500 sq. ft , r W . ~ 4 4• %43 \ ] a front setback variance. 1. For ;u, ~ :cr information contact Aspen 1- A 161 'U a' 190&7 11 4 ,Planning Dept. at 970-429-2758. 1 E - 4 + 4 I 1 I i F -3 9 1~ 324=**=.Ill.-I , ' , f.: 1 1 1 44 1 33....t 1 . Wd, 47 - '9 K %1,~6-- P , 5 '31. % ... 1 1 . 9.....Wi G 4 . 11 1,0 ./M---1 Ill'll'll . ill'll'll'Imilllilif f W pit ilmlwlil"'llyf . a r 1.11 £ a 11%~ il i *affll l . '. 6 V i Di L u- -: -~j 2-•+I-,-m·;~~ i t / 1 Al). ./Ill-15<59#-I'Il .........pi.........../.1....497yl 12-; RIA , ..1 8=-1/1. i..3 ~ ~l D * .4 I '441. ' A, 4, 6.- t. W . A p:)44,6, ~ ; '»'~!*i¢~.413 4,44 -,~ tte ':<0- 6 , I L 4/ P . v. e F *ft '4¥*11411· • .1.172 7.43 * J # L rj P 41 4 la 91 *,1.7 i - , 4ak*.a .1 + t,7 i 14 1' .. 4,• .; D' 4 491: · 4 k.tz >i,i i' tf¥ Al• . ' ~ 6/.: 5. -- 4 . ¥ , , r - -P.'., r -'#./ 1 41* j*%~ it. r.. r -,7, r , *6* » :· at: .,4 1 ... .r . 19 < 2.3 1*451 -i I. h . 42 >A 0 44*-- r = *.} .,1 4% . a, · b,4-35€~« . . 3 . „ 41 '' , 1 . 4, + . . ,.* *, ri:L .. 0 . 11 1, ' i \ ... .; 7 $ % 1 0 3 . , 'J *f ~_• LI,5:.34(htlit~· 'rt 6 2 4 2Ef'* 4~, , e ..1 96, 4 . 1 + fl# 64) ": 2. ·4 1 i ''rt ··FA. /7 4. . . 1,0 ) 1 ,46: I 4 . 4 b. 713 - *. ./EMB/(Ty" J 2Fi-' : i iqt . % *-1, . i.fi .*0" ? 50 : TJ... AL . 2 r 04/4 7. , I ¢2 / ) '6 Al,bA'.1/.* 17 i. *A 1,/.I ..:' r .. 2:. a /: I V ' I L =21//* ¢ A -I. r ... 63.94 . I ..> A 61 46 . 0 - n ... ' : i 3,}G-2* 644 \ ' 4 i , 36 - 143 y . . 1 . 241 - . 9.4, ./4..1, 4 . 4.9 40 ..' 11> ~ + f 1. t - - #4 4 4 · .4 d,· - 4/' 4 %6 // /~-1 ' u , 4 4(,t. I ' I .7. 40 /6,5 t .4 L : Kt[/€ exu . , ''/1/M , 23 4 ... . 1 ...1 9/ 2 . . . - #C A 3 12.4"4; * C %4.08 4 JI 4, . flaik ' . 0-· i I -/1. - 4 1 '- 14 .. ]13/ i . .1 k L - 9%431 **z * .. 39, = .4 -I.."../ - * 14 *- ../ ../ .4 2% 4. .'. ... 6 I. D 1, . f. 3 4 . r 91 .- 9 0 f,22 · ··4 7, " ':4 -60 r¥.1> lilt . ... .0 4 m A u , i.: >,m v : ·d Cti/Ash/ , 4, U 4,1 . . < 140 « 34 '..lf *i Wit. 8 ' 4!4 e . f , ; 34(+91/*Al 9/3 44'91*~f j~* ~2 3.- :0 4 - 9 /4,~ *M 7? v 4*A . . I. 130- 9/, 4.%%. *44 1% , .. 11.-r, . 6 . . 41 4 -- hi -",1,£.4 ' 9¥ y: b 0 %* 2 - + 4 ¥ 3 . 4 . .IM- 000\.10\3-A\Nec \16' ... <. .t . ?i, A 1 0, , 1. D COMMUNITY DEVEL~PIAERf'~- Agreement to Pay Application rees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Steev Wilson, on behalf of DWS Family Trust Phone No. (970) 279-4109 Owner ("ID: Email: swilson@forumphi.com Address of 114 Neale Avenue Billing 117 S Spring St, Ste 202 Property: Aspen, Address CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 (subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 0 Select Dept 0 Select Dept $ flat fee for $. flat fee for _ 0 $ flat fee for Select Dept 0 Select Review $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. 1,950 6 $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $265 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Chris Bendon Steev Wilson, on behalf of DWS Family Trust Community Development Director Name: Title: Representative City Use: 2215 Fees Due: $ Received: $ January, 2013 City of Aspen 1 130 S. Galena St. 1 (970) 920-5090 000 l, 2-0 13. Al-\-p 0 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Guthrie (970) 429-2758 DATE: 10.2.12 PROJECT: 114 Neale Avenue DESCRIPTION: The subject parcel is 6,001 square feet in size and contains a Victorian era home. The property is zoned R-15 and is a designated landmark. The site was the result of a historic landmark lot split approved by Council. The approval specified a maximum floor area of 1,345 square feet for 114 Neale, plus the possibility of a 500 square foot floor area bonus from HPC. RECEIVED HPC also has the authority to consider setback variances if they allow for better placement of the new construction relative to the historic building. JAN 0 9 2013 The applicant proposes to remodel the historic structure, expanding an CITY OF ASPEN existing addition. A detached single stall garage, accessed from Neale COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Avenue, is planned. A similar proposal received HPC approval in 2007, however the vested rights have expired and numerous aspects of the Municipal Code have subsequently changed, therefore a new land use review is required. Design review will be according to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Residential Design Standards. The review is a two step process, with a Conceptual application (mass, site plan, etc.) and a Final application (materials, landscape, lighting). The applicant is advised to consult with the Parks Department at an early date regarding any tree preservation requirements. In addition, coordination with the Engineering Department is advised in order to ensure that the new curb cut is designed to address safety concerns. An improvement survey will be needed to determine if any floor area reductions apply due to steep slopes or other conditions. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.415.070.D Major Development 26.415.110 Benefits 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.050 R-15 Zone District Land Use Code: http: //www.aspenpitkin.com/Depa rtments/Com mun itv-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ HPC Design Guidelines: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/H istoric-Preservation/H istoric- Properties/ Review by: Staff for completeness, HPC for determination of approval Public Hearing: Yes, at Conceptual and Final Referral Agencies: None Planning Fees: $1,890 for 6 billable hours (additional or less billable hours are at $315 per hour) Referral Agency Fees: None Total Deposit: $1,890 m Proof of ownership with payment. m Signed fee agreement. Il Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. U Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. O Total deposit for review of the application. m 10 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. El An 8 1/2" by 11"vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 0 Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing m Copies of prior approvals. m Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. KEY ~ Contained uithin a lettersigned 4 12, Propert> or dijtrict description includilig 27. A written description and/or graphic the applicant. the applicant's nunle. lim Litiw le,t. plic)tograp]13 mid/or other illustrations ofthe b ililding. Atlructure or addre.s und telephone number. und graphic 1 11.11 el-i I $ 111.11 d ocli men t i ts ph> N icol obiect proposed Ru- relocation. the name. address. and telephone cliaracteristics. 28. A written eiplanation ot tlic t>pc ol Iiumber ofan> representative 13. klentification 01 the character-defining relociltion reque>,ted (temill)1'ar> . on-hite or authori/.ed to act on belial 1 01 the features that distiliguish the elitit> which 0 111 Aite) and illA tification fur the need fur applie.anti should be plain ed. relocatic)/1. ¢ 2. lhe street address, legal 14. Verilicationtlitit the prof,sal complies Kith 29. A written report lk,in a licensed engineer or description, ancl parcel Xection 26.41 (k Residential Design architect regarding the soundness 01 the idei,tification inimber <,1 the Standar(Is. or a w ritter 1 cquew ful· .1 i al·iance building.Ati-ucture (11· obiect. its abilit> to propert> propo>,ed fur de# elopilielit. from an> staililard thilt is tic,t being met. uitlistand the pli> xicul mme and its ~ A disclosure of ownership oi the 15. Photographs. building milterial samples rehabilitation needs. once relocated, parcel proposed ful· de\ Clopment. and other exhibits. as needed. to accuratel> 30. A conceptual plan for the reeeking Jite con.ii>,ting Di a elli'i·ent certificate depict location. extent and design o['the pro# iditig prelitiiinat) init)rination on the from .1 1 itle ilihill·litice Compan>. or proposed uork. propert> boundaries. existing imprm ements attorne> licellhed to practice in the I~ An accurate representation of.111 major and site characteristics and the associated htate 01 C olorado. lihting the names building materials and finishes to be kised in plalined itllprolements. ofull o\\ iici > oft|le propert>. und the demelopment. depicted throlie|1 Nampleb ot- 31. 1:,idence ofthe financial ability to all illortgageN. ilidgmeliN. liell j. pllolographs. illille tlike the saft relocation. pre„n at ion ea>,ellients. Contructs and 17. Scaled elevations and/or drawings of'the und repair oftlie building. structure or obiect: agreement) affucting the parcel. and prnposed uork and its relationship to the site preparation und construction oinecessit·> demolibtrating the ouller'A right to designated historic buildings. stnictures. sites ili|histl'licture through the posting ofbonds or appl> for tile De\elopment lind loatures in its context. other linancial measures deemed appropriate. , Application. 18. Scaled drawings ottlic proposed Structure(s) 32. Supplementary· materials to prodde kili 4. An 8 1/2" \ 11" vicinity map or al|clition(h) depicting their |brm. inelliding litillerstanilingo| the larger Conte\t ibl the locating the subject parcel u ithin their height. Rushing. Scale. proportions and relocated propert> und its impact oil adiacent the Cit> 01'Aspen. 1-00| plan: und the primar> Eatures ofull properties. the neighliorhood or Mleetxcape. & 5. A Mite plan depicting the propoxed cle; atioilb in the neighborhood context. 33. It'l|le applicalit does not ou n the recei,ille labout and the proiect's pli>sical 19, Supplemental materials to plm kle .1 6„al site. proof from the >,itch propert> 41\\ 110· 01 relationship to the land und its description oi l lie co lite\1 sil l-1·0 litidi ng the the Hillingness to accept the relocated 4 It l'ollndings. designated histi,irie propert> or historic district building. sti'ucture or object. 6. A site improvement surve) i lic ludi ng Lit least one ( 1 ) 0 1- tlie 12)11(1 K i ng: 34. b idence that the applicant ha>, or N .seeking certified b> a registered land diagi-ums. mapx. photograplix. 3-1) model the necessary approvals to place the Alll'\C>or. licel,Neli in the State ol (digital or ph>sical) or xtreet Neupe ele,ations. building<,ii theidentilied recei\ing Nite. 11 Colorad 0. 4110\\ ing the Cllrl e lit tile site is outside oftlic cit) limits. stitills ofthe Darcil Meluding the 20. Pre]iminar> selection 01 uirimati building \el'ification that the bllikling Uill be current topograph> und , egetation. materials to be used in construction presened on its ne\\ .dle thi ough a i rmal C ] his 1-equircinent. or an> part represented by samples und/or photographs. action ofthe otherjurisdiction or a theicol. imi> lic \i .ii\ed b> tile ~. A statement. inchiding 11:11'1'Lathete.tor prekn ation easement. Communit> I):,clopinent Dh'ector graphics. indicating liou the Final .35. A written description 01'hou the propert> il the project iN dete milled not to Development Plan conli,rins to cloes not meet these criteria Ibi· designation, H .11'1 .1111 a >,tln L'> (1<)Clll]1(Vlt.) representations made or stipulations placed as 36. A lighting plan indicating the location ol'all ~ A #ritten description 4,1 tile a condition o 1 the apprin al of tlie Conceptual e,terior light lixtures und site lighting. and proposal and a „ritten e,plamition „, Development Plan. cut sheets li,1- each t> pc 01 Ii\ture proposed. Dilion the propose,1 deklopment 22. Final drawings ofall proposed structures(A) LiM|it |i\tin-cs mlist compl> uith the "Cit> of complies Nith the i·crieN criteria und/or additiones) included as part ofthe Aspen I listorie 1 i exen ation I )exign and I he (fit> cil'A>»pen Ilixti,lie de,ek,pinelit at %- = 1.0' scale Guidelines' and meet tile ('it> Lighting Code. Prehenation Dexign Cillidelinex 23. A revised site plan rele#ant to the derdopment 24. Revised scaled elevations and drawings applicatiC>n. 25. Photographs :ind other e,hibits to illustrate 18. Additional materials. the proposed changes. documentation. or reports :is 26. \\ 1-itten (locitmentation thot the Chiel deemed necessar> b> the Bui kling ()ilicial lias determined the building - ('oillimillit> I)ele|opinent !)irector. ati imminent hazard. 9 nonatne te\L ~9.~ ('allipletell Land Use Application graphic illustrations orother exhibits tlint Form, Signed Fee Agreement, and pi'(n ide e,idence that the bltilding. st I'llc lure Fee. orot,ject is ofno historic or architectural 10. Dimensional Requirement Form. value or importance. 11. Nile (,1' Ili~toric ilibtricl boundary Inal). Aspen Historic Preservatiot, Land Use Application Requirements. Updated: May 29.2007 r ----- CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT DWS FAMILY TRUST 3 REMINGTON LANE HOUSTON, TX 77005 January 9, 2013 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 114 Neale Avenue Dear Director, We hereby consent that Steev Wilson and Forum Phi may submit any and all Land Use Applications on our behalf for our property. They may represent us during the application review and approval processes. They may act on our behalf, and may also sign on our behalf all i applications and permits, and any and all documents required or ancillary thereto. Steev Wilson, Partner, AIA Forum Phi 117 S Spring St, Ste 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Thank you, Sincerely, / i \ f. ./ 4 k / / £) f / S 4 ,/h/Vowbu i'V N ,/, 0, ki t...1.>.. h Don W Short Date 1/8/13 Parcel Detail Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Abse»or Propert>' Search I Assessor Subset Ouery I Assessor Sales Hearch 7. aerk & Recorder Reception Search i reasin-er Tax Search Search GIS Map I GIS Help Basic Building (fliaracieristics I Value Sumnialy Parcel Detill I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential./(-101'nmercial illiprovernent Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Account Parcel 2012 Mill Property Type Area N umbe r N umbe r Levy 001 R()16674 273707383001 RESIDENTIAL,~ 32.325 Primary Owner Name and Address DWS FAMILY TRUST 3 REMINGTON LN HOUSTON. TX 77005 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description ~Sul~vision: 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT Lot: 1 Location Physical Address: 114 NEALEAVEASPEN 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN Subdivision: 1 !ISTORIC LOT SPLIT Land Acres: 0.000 Land Sq Ft: 6,001 www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R016674 .~.~age~.Ff ATTORNEYS 1~ TITLE Ill11111 FUND, INC, ALTA Commitment Form (6/17/2006) F2273 '-:'.- i 1, XI' l:11! COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE 1//C. 32.- L Issued by Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company'0), for valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of the Commitment. This Conimitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. has caused its corporate name to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A, ATTORNEYS TITLE GUARANTY FUND, INC. Le -2) 1 / f «-0--L C 0/ ERIC R. MORGAN PRESIDENT FOR INFORMATION OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT: Winter T. Van Alstine, 715 W. Main Street, Suite 305, Aspen Colorado 81611, Phone: (970) 925-7328, Fax: (970) 925-7348 Copynght 2006-2009 Amencan l.and hUe Association. All r,ghts reserved. the use of this Form is restricted to AL ]A licensees and ALIA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited Reprinted under license from the Amencan L.and TItle Associat(on CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2, If the Proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the Proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named Proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the Proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action of actions or rights of action that the Proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of the Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at <http://222.alta.org/ >. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All righls reserved, The use of this Form is festricted 10 ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. A 1 other uses are prohibiled. Reprinted under license from the Amedcan Land Tttle Association. t.32135~4 Attorneys I 11 1 1 ./ I Atnerkan Land'title A,bvekilion Commitillelit Vif* Title (:u;Ii':„ity Fulid, 111£ COMMITMENT NO. PC201208012598 File No. PC12002992 SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: 8/6/2012 at 7:45 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Pmm~mi A. ALTA Owner's Policy (06/17/06),Amount $2,445,000.00 $2,356.00 Proposed hisured: Donald W. Short and Aim M. Short Certi ficate of Taxes Due $25,00 Endorsements: 110.1(1,2,3 and 4), 130 $50.00 Additional Charges: $0.00 Total $ 2,431.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or refened to in this Commitnient and covered herein is vested in Bret F. Thoeny and Lissa L. 7.wahlen 4. The estate or interest iii the land described or referred to in this Commitinent mid coveted herein is Fee Simple 5. The land re ferred to in this Commitinent is situate in the county of PITKIN, State of Colorado and is described as follows: See Schedule C attached hereto. For informational purposes only, the property address is: 114 Neale Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Wintel- 'I'. Van Alstine Authorized Officer or Agent 2622 Member Number FOR INFORMATION OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WI TH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT: Winter 7. Van Alstine, 715 W. Main Stiect, Suite 305, Aspen Colorado 81611, Phone: (970) 925-7328, Fax: (970) 925-7348 THISCO; 1,9 1 IMEN I IS ISS PED SLB}EC'[ TO TI[E STATrIEN'l'OF I Ell.MS, C OXI)]TIONS /431) s Ill'Ul.Al I ONS ATTACHED C.P) fighl 1( 1{16-211~]9 Ameri:an [.and l itle A„,>ciati,in. All right: resened. I he ilie ul thi. I-urm 1, re,Im·ted ti .At-TA liern.ec. an,1 Al.TA memberI in gund st:111,1 Ag a: .fihe ible i,fuse. All other u xe R are pr,ihibited. Reprinted under Iii·enx f .111 the Ametiedn Land Title ,)=1·iatic:n 5 11 American Land Title Association Commitment Attorneys lille Guar:inly Fund, Inc. COMMITMENT NO. PC20 I 208012598 FILE No. PC12002992 SCHEDULE B - Section 1 - Requirements The following are the requirements to be complied with: a. Pay the agreed aniounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. b. Pay us the p'emiums fues and charges for the policy. c. Documents satisfuctory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered and recorded. d. You must tellits in writing thenameof anyone not referred toin this Commitinent who willget an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. e. Payment of all taxes, charges and assessments, levied and assessed against the subject premises which arc due and payable. f. A Certification of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or an authorized agent (pursitant to Senate Bill 92- 143, (:RS 10-l 1-122). g. Receipt by the Company of the appropriate affidavit as to new construction and indemnifying the Company against any unfiled inaterialmen's or mechanic's liens. h. Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fce simple estate or interest iii the land described or referred to lierein, from Bret F. Thoeny and Lissa L. Zwahlen to Donald W. Short and Ann M. Short, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A, NOTE: C.R.S. A§38-35-109(2) required that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the properly address) be included on the fuce of the Deed to be recorded. i. Release of the Deed of Trust from Bret F. Thoeny and Lissa L. Zwahlen to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Affiliated Financial Group, Inc. to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $700,000.00, and ally other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated July 22,2002, and recorded July 23,2002, as Reception No. 470114. j. Release o f the Deed of Trust fi-om Bret F. Thoeny, and Lissa L. Zwahlen to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $1,500,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations seem'ed thereby, dated November 27,2006, and recorded Novembet 27,2006, as Reception No. 531503. k. Improvement Survey Plat sufficient iii form and content and certified to the Company, Exception will be taken to adverse matters disclosed thereby. Note: If the sales price of the subject property exceeds $100,000.00, the seller shall be required to comply with the disclosure or withholding provisions of C.R.S. §39-22.604.5 (lion-resident withholding) Note: Effective September 1,1997, C,R.S. §30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right mid bottom margin of at least one-hal f inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not con fonn, Note: All conveyances (deeds) subject to the documentary fee submitted to the coutity clerk and recoider for recoidation imist be accompanied by a Real Property Transfer Dedmation. This Declaration imist be completed and signed by the grantor (seller) or grantee (btiyer) Copyright lt){16-74{19 Ame,1,·.m 1 .,Iltl I lt!: A.wi.,tion All right. men-ed The u.e of thib Fomh is re,Incled to Al. rA licen,ee. an,1 Al.IA members ing,4 .t,:i·,!ing 3, 01'lhe d.:t¢ 01-u>e. Al| other u,es .ure prohibit" :i heen.e fr.,m the American I.und litle Asai,,tiun 1 Repanted und American Land Title Association Commitment Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. COMMITMENT NO. PC201208012598 FILE No. PC'. 12002992 SCHEDULE B - Section 2 - Exceptions Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims ofeasements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts iIi boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which arc not sliown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attacliing subsequent to the effuctive date hereof but prior to the date the proposed itisured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes for the year 2012 not yet due or payable. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in the United States Patent dated August 21, 1958, and recorded August 29,1958, in Book 185 at Page 69, as Reception No. 106874, as follows: right of way for ditches or canals as constructed by the authority of the United States. 8. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Boundary Agreement Plat recorded April 29, 1982, in Book 13 at Page 35, as Reception No. 240935. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance Designating a Portion of 17 Queen Street as H, Historic Landmark Pursuant to Division 7, Section 7-701 of the Land Use Code, dated March 12, 1990, and recorded August 21, 1990, in Book 627 at Page 834, as Reception No, 325486. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Covenant Burdening Real Property dated April 8, 1991, and recorded July 1,1991, in Book 650 at Page 264, as Reception No. 334163, 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance of the City Council, of the City of Aspen, Colorado, Designating 17 Queen Street, a Metes and Bolinds Parce] of Land being part of Tract 40, East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen as "If', Historic Landmark Pursuant to Section 26.76.030 of the Aspen Municipal Code, dated January 13, 1997, and recorded September 3, 1997, as Reception No. 407978. 12. Any and ali notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Subdivision Exemption Plat for 114 Ncale /17 Queen Street Lot Split Plat recorded May 29, 1998, in Plat Book 45 at Page 17, as Reception No. 417433. 13. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Approving an Application for Miller Development to Remodel a Historic House at 114 Neal Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspeii, Colorado (Parce] 11)# 2737-073-83-001), Resolution No. 49, Series of 1999, dated October 27,1999, and recorded Novet}iber 12,1999, as Reception No. 437688. 14. Tenns, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance of the Aspeii City Council Granting Approval for a Subdivision Exemption for an Historic Landmark Lot Split at 114 Neale Avenue / 17 Queen Street (Parcel 1, of tile Boundary Agreement Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 35, City of Aspen, Coutity of Pitkin, State of Colorado) Aspen, Colorado, and Declaring an Emergency iii Accordance with Section il l of the Aspen City Charter (Ordinance No, 16 - Series of 1993), dated May 26, 1998, and recorded Febnlary 18,2000, as Reception No. 440652. American I and Title Association Commitment Attorneys Title € 5 11 9 1 ranty Fund, Ine. COMMITMENT NO. PC201208012598 FILE No. PC 12002992 SUIEI)ULE B - Section 2 - Exceptions 15. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified linder the Resollition of the Aspen Historic Preseivation Commisison (HPC) Approving ati Application for Major Development (Conceptual) and a Variance from the Residential Design Standards for 114 Neale Aventle, Lot I of the 114 Neale / 17 Queen Street Historic Landinark Lot Split, City and l ownsite of Aspen, Colorado (Resolution No. 29, Series of 2006) dated October 25,2006, mid recorded March 15,2007, as Reception No. 535455. 16. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Approving an Application for Major Development (Final) for 114 Neale Avenlle, Lot ] of tile 114 Neale / 17 Queen Street Historic Landmark Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado (Resolution No. 17, Series of 2007) dated February 28, 2007, and recorded November 11,2011, as Reception No. 584275. The Owner's policy to be issued hereunder will contain, in addition to the items set forth in Schedule B - Section 2, the following items: (1) the mortgage, if any, required linder Schedule B - Section 1, Item (c); (2) unpatented mining claims, t'eservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issitance thereof, water rights, claims or title to water; (3) any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. Note: Colorado Division of Insmance Regulation 3-5-1, Section 7, Paragraph G requires that every title insurance company shall be responsible to the proposed insured(s) subject to the terins and conditions of the title insurance commitment, other than the effective date of the title insurance commitment, for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whelievet' the title insurance company, or its agent, conducts the closing and settlement service tliat is in conjunction with its issuance of an owners policy of title insurance and is responsible for the recording and filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed, Note: Exception 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of this Commitment way be deleted from the policy(s) to be issued hereunder upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described iii Schedule A of tliis Commitment must be a single family residence, which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials may have been furnished by inechanics or materialmen for purposes of constrliction on the land described iii Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 13 months. C. AT(}F must receive the appropriate affidavit(s) indemnifying ATGF against mechanic's and materialments liens not filed. D. Any deviations from conditions A through C above is subject to such additional requirements or information as ATGF way deem necessary, or, at its option, ATGF may refuse to delete the exception. Note: The following disclosures are hereby made pursuant to §C,R. S, 10-11-122 i. Tlie subject property inay be located in a special taxing district ii. A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each tax jurisdiction shall be obtained from the county treasurer of the county treasm-el's authorized agent iii. Information regarding special districts and the boundaries ofsuch districts may be obtained from the board ofcounty commissioners, the county clerk and recorder or the county assessor. Note: If there is recorded evidence that one or more mineral estates has been severed, Icased or otlierwise conveyed from tile sllitace estate of the subject property described in Scliedule A of this Commitment, there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all of the owneiship interest in oil, gas 01' other minerals or geothermal energy in the subject property. Such mineral estate may inchide the right to enter and use the surface of the subject property without the surface owner's permission, Cop>right 2006-2(109 Aincrican [and I ille A..,3,·iation All n.liti te:ened Ihe w.e ofihi. Formisrestricted tu ALI'Alicen.eeg and Al.1 A member: iii gued st,,nding a> of the t ArTORNEYS TITLE ~~ FUND, INC. GUARANTY Committed to Protecting Customer Information In order to better solve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with cermin information, We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with mich information - particularly any personal or financial inforniation. You have a light to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, ATGF Ims adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This I# i vacy Policy governs our use of the information that you provide to us, It does not govern the inamier in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as Mformation obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are zitilizing, the types o f nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other cominunications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • information about your transactions with us, our agents, or others; and Information we receive from a consumer-reporting agency. Use of In formation We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law, We niay, however, store such inforination indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our agents or affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include Attorneys Title Insurance Fund, Inc., AT(_if's reinsurer and parent company. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our custonier, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use out best efforts to ensure that no unatithorized parties have access to any of your information. We resti-ict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities that need to know that infonnation to provide products or senices to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and iii accordance with this Privacy Policy. We corrently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safegliards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. SCHEDULE, C File #: PCl 2002992 Lot i, as sliown 011 the Subdivision Exemption Plat of 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC I.OT SPI.IT, accoiding to the Plat thereof recorded May 29, 1988 in Plat Book 45 at Page 17, Pitkin County, Colorado. *41:21~ RGcol·jed at 1145 ot.Clock P.M. ,Allfrust 29, 1958 - Reception No. 106874 Pevav 6. Coble· Recorder ' Colorado 013679 ·1·-1010 (52):t<,1,.1 19 '61 VE*be Mititeb %,tated of Ztmerica, 020 811 10 (Dijom 1103¢ pres¢1110 51181[ come, ©reeting: WHEREAS, a Certificate of the land Office at Denver, Colorado, ic now deposited lu the Bureau of land Mimagement, whereby it appears that pursuant to Elections 2387, 2388, and 2389 of the Revised Statutes of phe United States 11111 payment had been irdlde by A. E. Robison, Mayor of the City of Aspen, Pitkin Count: Colorado, for the following described land: Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado. T. 10 8., R. 84 W., Tracts A aud B. lite aret, deacribed Couttiino 68.25 acres, according to the Official Plat; of the al.rvey of the Baid I.,aid, on file in the kireall 01' Idind t.innagement, NOW KNOW YE, 'Illat there ia, thorot'ore, granted by the UNITED STA'rES, unto the said A. E. Robison, 6110 tract of Iwond above described; ·TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the gaid tract of IAnd, with the apptu'tet,Clnces thereof, 'unto the said A, E, Robison, in trust for the oeveral use and benefit of the occupants of the Aspet: fluwasite Addition, accol'ding to their respective interests, anil to lita Buccesijoi'o in Frust ao aforouaid; mibject to any veoted and accrued water righte for mining;- agricultural, naanufacturing, or other purposes, and rights to djtches and reservoira uoed in connection WIth such water rl l;ht 5 as mny be recogrized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws, and decisons of coin·to; and there 16 reserved from the lands hereby granted, a right of way thereon for ditches or COAals constructed by the .authority of the United States, iN Ti·.ST·IMONY 1,\'lli-GliEOF, (42. under.signed authorizcri ctiteer of the Burrau of. Land Management, in *901·dance iv,th the provisions of the Act of June 17, 1048 (62 Stat„ 476), Jins. in the name of the United States, car,sed these lette,s to hi, nialle Palent·, und tne Seal of the liureau to bc he:·encto :tilixed. Givm: linda my hant in the Dist,-i'icl of Cohunbia, the ~1 ,i ~~* 1(' 3 41 \'61 6, 1 ... ly,ENTY"FULST (My of AUG[JE,9.1 in the >·ear of c-·i 4SEAL.1-·' nUr 1.01[l 011¢ thoUS.,1181 nme hundied and FIb'17.-Eloiri' and of the Intle tic·n<dence of the linited States the one hundl·cd and EIG IrrY«·']liliI<11. For l.}'c Dirrclor, Bot'Can of' I.and Matiageme:it. By . '. -m 17,/ j 2, ~4 1 4 'i Chic',j,ilri,1.1.St. '4. 1 '<1),·48 Pitte,·,l Nui;:bel·.~..~ . ,- 1 24.9 { 4325486 00/2,1/90 13:51 1-<ci· 'MS.00 BK 627 1-'G. 834 43,lvin, 1).n,vic. , 4, - " d , 1-4 el i n f'' Ii:y r-Per·1' , Doi- 1, 00 43 \,l':' \ 3 ORDINANCE NO. /4~- (Series of 1990) : AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING A PORTION OF 17 QUEEN STREET AS Ii, HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO DIVISION 7, SECTION 7-701 OF THE LAND USE CODE. WHEREAS, Lana and Henry Trettin as Trustees of the PS productions Limited Benefit Plan Communications, owners of the i real property described as 17 Queen Street, Parcel I of the Boundary Agreement Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 35 of the records of Pitkin County, Colorado, have filed an , application for historic landmark designation pursuant to Section F -. 1 . 7-701 of the Land Use Code. WHEREAS, the property was added to the official Inventory of f . ' -: i.?61 Historic Sites and Structures in 1989, and has received the /0 historic evaluation rating of "4"; and 4 WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee recommended historic designation at a duly noticed public meeting on November , ~ 29, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommended historic designation for the portion of the parcel ~ ! immediately associated with historic resource at a duly noticed | public hearing on February 20, 1990; and ~ WHEREAS , City Council wishes to pursue those recommendations and complete the designation process. ..i NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE i CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: >-N~,%- ' kph 149 2,9 1 . ",1.'I, I I , . , %10.;t./4 1 43254[16 00/21/90 13:51 Rer 1·15.00 31 627 PG 835 Section 1 Silvi,-· 110.vi·-1, Pi {·1.-in Cnty Clet-I:, Doc· 1.00 2 That the portion of the property at 17 Queen Street immediately associated with the historic cottage (to be relocated to the northeast corner of the parcel) (description to be attached), City of Aspen, be granted H, Historic Landmark Designation. Section 2 That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the rezoning described in Section 1 and the Planning Director shall be authorized and directed to amend said map to reflect said ' rezoning. i Section 3 That the Planning Director shall be directed to notify the City (.t Clerk of such designation, who shall record among real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's office a 2 1 certified copy of this ordinance. ' Section 4 That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such 0. i portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent ~ provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the 1 - remaining portions thereof. 1% ag Section 5 That a public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the 94--7 day of »Cle/ , 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council 10 Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days , r r 2 k '99· 3.9 4 r, . f: . . - ; 'r 141.t.. ..14,1 . , F 1 - ,.444; 2 Ill; ib. ;;1,4, 83254116 Of!/21/90 13:51 Rec 015.00 1112 627 PG 836 ij,-p %t Pitkin enty Cler-11, D or 0. 00 prior to which hearing notice of the same shall be published once ~ f , in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen, 1 1 . INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED'as provided'by law by ' • f the City Council of the City of Aspen oh the i.. b q0 19803. -20///59/a//133« . --rl 1 '1 William L. Stirling, Mayor 1.01 / 0 k. . . i . 9 ('.,4 K#phrrIHi.... Koch, City Clerk ~ ' 6190 2 -4 * ~ FINALLY adopted, passed and approved this / day of 4 j *42, , 19M. William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: , , .131 , I <f. (Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk ./.44« j ord:ligs 3 t / 1 1 9. mil.: 4 / A C 4 ' /6 ¢ . j, 9% I. ./ 1.. ' £1 Y' -- '' ~ '15'· 24'31140 54.96't,·..N ·'-,2. ~h- '14..v; ...>, 9..a- ::' i ~th)·~~It·'64,4_MAD'Ox,; *it*WL 1.L ' . .3:f-'t.41*...·,-i-<. ·t .V . ;,7-t·' .' ,;'f. ''.'..6 .,4.'.. ..1)-: '. ·· ..1 '....:Al '. l 8334163 07/01/91 14:34 Rec $25.00 BK 650 PG 264 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc *.00 COVENANT BURDENING REAL PROPERTY Lana Trettin and Henry Trettin, as the Trustees of the PS Productions Limited Defined Benefit Pension Plan (the "Trustees") , being the fee simple owners of that certain real property situate in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado: Parcel I of the Boundary Agreement Plat -1 .. thereof recorded in Plat Book 13 at Page 35 of the records of Pitkin County, Colorado, do . , based upon the following preambles, create the following covenants which shall be a burden and benefit to the property herein above 2 described (the "Property") , .. and WHEREAS, on November 29, 1989, the duly constituted Historic Preservation Committee of the City of Aspen ("HPC") granted It'" conceptual redevelopment approval for 17 Queen Street, a synonym . - for the Property, said redevelopment generally consisting of the . IJ relocation of an existing historic cottage to a specified location , on the northeast portion of the Property and the construction of a ,/ ,€ new single family residence on the remainder of the Property, and f WHEREAS, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen, the conceptual redevelopment approval so given on November 9, 1990 was for a period of one year, but application for the extension thereof has been made to the HPC, and - 2.1~ WHEREAS, the Trustees are presently unable to proceed to final development on the conceptual redevelopment approval in its entirety, but are able to accomplish the relocation and renovation ~, ~ of the historic cottage as contemplated under the conceptual :3 redevelopment plan, and • 23 WHEREAS, the Trustees have submitted to the HPC and have had approved by it a bifurcated final redevelopment plan dealing only with the relocation of the historic cottage to a site on the,- northeast portion of the Property, as described in Exhibit "A" 4 --& attached hereto and made a part hereof and for the renovation '! 4~--- thereof on the portion of the Property described in Exhibit "A", and WHEREAS, the Trustees desire to extend and contemplate the possible further extension of time for proceeding with the final development plan for the remainder of the Property until such time as they can construct their new single family residence thereon, and WHEREAS, the Trustees are willing to covenant that the 4/623 remainder of the Property, i.e. that other than that portion of the ¢*E 2*4 Property described in Exhibit "A'I, in addition to that described in 3 13<·B·. r ~. . %·i-··.: p.70.1-.-·: ~ .,. ::.9-:3-<,t·op·i·<-:P.jit'f2·*:),0.-i ~ ~ ~ - ~<-< ~4 ~~"3~2~7'filiE,1 ,vI . .It. N; . 'P f-,¥-9 .. »28,h '1, i;,;~~-<Iji\,6~23.2'.-15: 4,. 21714%Avant«Nuvr»~»r.·.· L, 1, :,1 11334163 07/01/91 14:34 Rec $25.00 131< 650 PG 265 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Enty Clerk, Doc $.00 Exhibit "A", shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the HPe in order to assure that the Property in its entirety shall be developed in a manner consistent with the conceptual redevelopment ·· approval given and which may be extended from time to time by the HPC, and WHEREAS, the 11PC and the Trustees are both desirous of ensuring that the historic cottage shall be relocated and renovated . 4,6. 2 1 in accordance with the bifurcated final development approval with respect thereto, '3 W / NOW, THEREFORE, the Trustees hereby declare as follows: 1. The Trustees agree that they shall relocate the historic structure situate on the Property to the portion thereof described in Exhibit "A", and renovate the same in accordance with the HPC approved bifurcated final development plan approved July 23, 1991, as said approval was amended on March 27, 1991, relating to such ~ relocation and renovation of the historic cottage. 2. The Trustees agree, that in addition to the Property 1 . described in Exhibit "A", that the remainder of the Property shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the HPC and that the HPC shall, pursuant to §24-7-601 of the Land Use Code of the City of 'i Aspen, have continuing jurisdiction to review the redevelopment of I such remainder of the Property to ensure its compatibility with the i ~ Property described in Exhibit "A" which has been historically b designated. 3. The Trustees represent to the HPe that they shall as necessary apply to the HPC for further extensions of their present conceptual redevelopment approval for the remainder of the Property as shall be required. 4. This covenant shall be a covenant running with the Property, and a burden and a benefit thereto, binding upon the Trustees, their successors, grantees and assigns in and to the 57 Property. 1 J Dated 404 9 , 1991. ) :' - 1.~64:zc C./: Henry Tret/in, as Trustee of the p Ps p40ctions Limited Defined BenefitiF@WEibn Plan - / de,z« \4 f- £ana-Tr:etti_-as Trustee of the PS Productions Limited Defined Benefit Pension Plan 2 g -PM l.· 2, I .. V I . : F·Ft' ' il Y; 3 9 'i '3.' '·' . -cit,1•'1-,1,71(.'U NA ·h 113.34163 07/01/91 14:34 Rec $25.00 BK 650 PG 266 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnly Clerk, Doc $.00 STATE OF L,<A\.-30(v\~b_. ) SS. COUNTY OF _LoaErvt; f? 1 . The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _1\24 day of [NOV\\ , 1991 by }[enry Trettin as Trustee of PS Production& Limited Defined Benefit Pension Plan. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires:~11\1 l', \ 9(\LI , DEBORAH ANN SAOLOUSKOS, 1 J'/ rwi,Wa Notag P.U. - C.Vo,ria 1 itol/tknida/*uhu- ~titlt*7 105 ANGELES COUNTY ) ~ \~~ M,Coff,n Eip'es JU£ 11.1994 | Notary Publ ic ~,/ -/ ...... · STATE OF <h,~~0'0A ) 1, SS. COUNTY OF \nos Av@g } The ~oregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _~_£14 6.43 day of h (0 1 2\ , 1991 by Lana Trettin as Trustee of PS Productions Limited Defined Benefit Pension Plan. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 44\7 U 0914 Ff . i¢ ~ ~97?P~ OFFICIAL NOTAAY SEAL 3 (110101(1'147 A~ *4&.1/46 ~f- 1 24. OEBORAU ANN SADLOUSKOS 1 11.52.1£e0 Now, Puwic - CaMornia 1 Notary Public ~,0,0 1.*P'uywuN:42 Z:U:11, i ACCEPTANCE By its OHAIRMAN . tiLL ross , dated - ereby accepts the foregoing Covenant, and agrees to , 1991, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation extend from time to time as reasonably needed by the Trustees of the PS Productions Limited Defined Benefit Pension Plan the ba="-'I- conceptual redevelopment approval for the portion of the Property. Dated MACf 2'1~ , 1991. , CITY OF ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Ry *t------ . 2 4. ' 4, . . p· K 7/. I 1 , , ,·1 a' E,4.4 Lt.: C.A,.' gc'.:.jbjt· t.'·.i,0.2.¥ 4 . i ,- . 7 q *C o 11334163 07/01/91 14:34 Rec $25.00 BK 650 FO 267 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Enty Cler·k, Doc $.00 STATE OF COLORADO ) ' ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) Theforegoing instrument was ac 2%32 77 ed before me this --3,/ff ·' day of 3}04 , 1991 by 4 tr) as IVVID. B.V118.i:(//Gi of City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee.1 i <931 13. 24:,9, 3 I .2 Witness my hand and official seal. .1.- I j It 1 /, 2 1 ' My commission expires: D.4 Con,niollon exphs 927/92 rn L»,324/ 121.,thay,2 -2-Z~ Ngtary Publif I Approved: 1 c=U _<__-h<} · 0,#ht,~tk,~----- -3, Edward M. Caswall, 4 City Attorney BYA )lili .4.Flik Rokanne Efpin, Staff Planner ; iracth'.burden 17 i€f 4 4.. ,, 'll 24' .,. .. -- 2 2.-3 <' 3,1:,tift'ftiv.,f ts 1...fft«- -<-I~. 01,4~itti~,31:~i~i'.49-Ati p N:'.41·-t '*'; 449& V, ~--·:...1. ,,t. u.,714€,i>. 14·f'lif?U...}41; a• 1.• 'i'' ¥ '97:,10;13 4 ..:/ i¢iffk04.,24.4./ 11·.1 ,14,1.-7,7.YV ' 4 3'; *1'/ 431 ¥::.;C 99'9 ~,,'Or,fiLW·1/4~6·rl,+,··,4:in, 9, ,<.'' 4 1.4..7., .... .4 ..3-,Ai.4, ';.3 ·13-72' ''-: f'...7:j.: 2,'.< ..·...'+~1 (' -1..2..' #334163 07/01/91 14:34 Rec $25.00 131< 650 PG 268 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 EXHIBIT "A" HISTORIC OVERLAY OF THE TRETTIN PROPERTY , 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A parcel of land being part of Trect 40, East PT\.t 7. Aspen Addition, and more fully described as . follows: : .Zi Beginning at a point being a T-bar with B.L.M. t< aluminium disk attached, whence corner 11 of said Tract 40, being a U.S. Cadastral Survey brass cap, bears N. 53° 32' 21" E; thence S 15° 24' 00" W, 62.46'; thence N 56° 29' 48" W, 73.17'; thence N 33° 30' 12" E, 51.00'; thence S 65° 21' 00" E, 54.41'; to the point of beginning. -. Said parcel contains 3542.88 square feet more , fl * n or less. 1, br< . 14 1 -1 4, 31 4 4.{5 0 2 4. 5 1111111111'111'111'111111'11'u 111'11111111011'11 407978 09/03/1997 10:27A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 1 of 5 R 26.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKINCO COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 1 (Series of 1997) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, DESIGNATING 17 QUEEN STREET, A METES AND BOUNDS PARCEL OF LAND BEING PART OF TRACT 40, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN AS "H," HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO SECTION 26.76.030 OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, Henry and Lana Trettin, owners of 17 Queen Street, a metes and bounds parcel of land being part of tract 40, East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen, have filed an application for Historic Landmark Designation of their property, pursuant to Section 26.76.040 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission recommended Historic Designation 6-0 on December 13, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended Historic Designation 6-0 for the subject property at a duly noticed public hearing on January 7,1997} and : WHER~AS, City dound wishes to affirm those recommendations as rendered by the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning and Zoning Commission and complete the Landmark Designation process; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.76.020 of the Municipal Code, the City Council has found that the subject property meets standards B (architectural importance), D (neighborhood character), and E (community character); and WHEREAS, the property owner shall receive a $2,000 landmark 111111111111111111 lilli 1111111111111111111 lilli lili 111 407978 09/03/1997 10:27A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 2 of 5 R 26.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKINCO COLORADO designation grant, for which the property is eligible, pursuant to Section 26.76.040 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.44.060, the park dedication fees associated with the development of this property as finally approved by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be waived. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Sectien_l That the structure and property at: 17 Queen Street, a metes and bounds parcel of land being part of tract 40, East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen be granted "H," Historic Landmark Designation. Sectign_2 That the property owner shall receive a $2,000 landmark designation grant pursuant to Section 26.76.040 of the Municipal Code and that the park dedication fees associated with the development of this property as finally approved by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be waived pursuant to Section 26.44.060. Sigfirll.3 That the Zoning District Map be amended to reflect the rezoning described in Section 1 and the Community Development Director shall be authorized and directed to amend said map to reflect said rezoning. SECiiQll-A That the Community Development Director shall be directed to notify the City Clerk of such designation, who shall record among the real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office a certified copy of this Ordinance. 2 111111111111 mil lilli lilli lilli 111111111111'81 lili 407978 09/03/1997 10:27A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 3 of 5 R 26.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKINCO COLORADO 22CtiQO-5 That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. S@GliQn-6 A public hearing on the Ordinance was held on the 10th day of February, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing notice of the same was published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by the ~~ouncil of the City of Aspen on the 13th day of January, 1997. ':S17;k ' >i. John S. Bennett, Mayor e. "*'- u· ~'4 8/1' / f/ATTEST: .- i j blf,·:s B*k·. 14 64_ , ~ 4400*,i,ti. J¢och, City Clerk 9.1/ ' i i j j ·.F»*AULY adopted, passed, and approved this l~:4- day of 1 19970 5*36 John S. Bennett, Mayor , lt£51'..Kathryng. 14ch, City Clerk - LF'efik-,Axiii; 0,~p- 41¥Ii#ggfrgl.o~c 1¥*i mti i 3 1111111111111111 lilli lilli lilli 111111111 lilli lili I• -- 407978 09/03/1997 10:27A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 4 of 5 R 26.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKINCO COLORADO EXHIBIT 8 ib /2 -% P 0%/A/. k SCALE F »4 :y /9*, 1 0 j . ¢mi• ..r AJ:~5'- %6 .4 Z= 37 , 15 41 9 W 5,30 140,62:f <:fF i 4 .Ry 9% 1 990 L.»lor'*47*- 3 LEGEND & NOTES r //////9/7 //// TrTU 1- 2/. //1// IS. . 7 :· -04 CO.. •17.«2.'Q JA.I.i,Z/,1 " ... .. 7. PARZ EL 1 1,4/n-Ur C-- Cnill I* /7'9-'1 2237!FiCATiON i, p.i. I. ..,., Min" dmt,¥ 1*r ™i, t-,--* uan- earl•lcar, 'i. IT li ./ / U- 1.'.-f - €4) , ...6- 1101 11« Ill„Ill1ll a 7,1 ~ mil 4,1 * Tm, _ 941, - _ klll DIW YfiLIT¥ Ilinl. Al Olll*Ll '"01' MI Will'4'11 * 9< La¥. =ap¥ M 1/0€11~ "/ 94// 1/ " ""//// N'W//= - 1- - - CU/'*/17 <-ru. . 1,"ll I lill,0,4.1/ I'l' 1 -1' MT. me~¥ M I<all. 9 091,7 .. W.. "".1 - 'll /' , d>, I ' - HERBO N PARK. IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE PARCEL 1 , 00 THE aOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED IN 'LAT BOOK !3 AT PAGE 35. CCUNTY OF P 1 TX IN. COLORADO ... - l. : A.,en. ,Cal=ada *121: ; ' - ~ [ EXHIBFr Al- :·- - -. 10•12; Calita•=lon: 113 -6 "0==r DEScrAp== . . . 1 K.. f N . 62 -V ....4.- ,.~(.,lf..4.tfp~r»J ~~41,4 .4.*-62 ;4£UG~*+ 'g..2.15J....b 2 #1¢ 4. . 1. 41 - . . eh.- 1 15 24' ~09 W. '•070 1-=; - 1. ' .. 0/m. $ 30 17, 0 8.: ¥4 164.37 £/Ii; mills* » GM:*.30' 4 107.64 2-t; . 1-0-/1*' *"M-;0 *, ' 04-$8 5-t; ' f 17 74 17#DIar ....f . 2. r boillit,r ~-8 3 43 11, 90 3. 34.41 1.t al,Ig -*JI /irri :f,If.,ifi~l~&6118i„~4- 9/~7 L 2=11£92 't "*19* Said 942,*1 1~ 21.461 •9,811 Z••: 10:3 9: 11... - ,/P . - - , - :: L - 111'11111111111111 lilli 1111111'111111'1111 '1111 lili '111 -': i ' c .. : 46'7 .:·:,Li·.ri,):4:.~, f. ..25 ·' ·IA : p PE»Uwl.457- 407978 09/03/1997 10:27A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 5 of 5 R 26.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKINCO COLORADO - . Vr 1.j : Z I 1.'91 1 , ) ' '17 4, , ip 1 idir 1 1' ' 11/9 7. U!/ 1 '. 1/ 1 j<)/1'f . ' 7 -'.f ; ' |' ll I .Il .4 InN. ./Ili~l~ ~~I ~. I - .. .... 1 / T . *f*n 1. I. I , . 1.,„, ., .l,hi.11"41 1 11 I. , ' I IR lit • . 2 ~xs f¥' Ir I, 'll •/ .... il'~i 111 1./1,1· 14, 111 ON A -1- . 71:,~2:3956-- 44 3··-'-90'.2 AU ./ 1. r..01.% H e TJ J E *5, 1 5., r· Mul 1%.4/ I ,/ i L./ r 1 .1,;. 14 -I t f== l'.1 / . I I W '1.4 : U .'.,·t.'.12· ......1 LOT .i ' , I 4/ \\,\1 - Y 19 1,£1 .' 2 „:. 2% 01 .2 .„ '. d + 1 11. 9/ \. \ ·lill'r 24 '~ , Mt '' f. ..r .(0.11 I .*'4 A.."mil- I A 9 1 1% 1- I 1 7, 7 2 ' , 0, I 1..'.,1 , 4 11, / 4 1 r < : t' r N L.,- rha...irl N r 1 \ 1 I \ r.; k P . 1. - ~ 41.~L. -1.~ .F, 4 h r '%. i.)* .. I 'li v _./. -4~ ' .1 -f I i ./ *I * * 9/ I ·• I.%-I I V .• I. • V , i,-1.0 ~ Mik. .· I _· *. .U ~v i'kl.1 ilA K« 8 i Afo, puu r.„«n·11• 3·. ' AL f~,1-4, 49,1 P? 5 1 - -2 2- RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO REMODEL A HISTORIC HOUSE AT 114 NEALE AVENUE, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID # 2737-073-83-001 RESOLUTION NO.~ ~kERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, Lisbeth Ensminger, represented by Glenn Rappaport, has requested minor development approval for 117 Neale Avenue, 17 Queen Street Historic Landmark Lot Split, Parcel 1. City and Townsite of Aspen. The project involves adding windows and steps to a non-historic porch on the side of the house; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, narnely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard. side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and 1111111 lilli 111111 lilli 11111111111 lilli 111 lilli lili lili 437688 11/12/1999 09:43A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated October 27. 1999, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 27, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application. found the application to meet the standards. and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 7 to 0. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for the properly located at 114 Neale Avenue, 17 Queen Street Historic Landmark Lot Split, Parcel 1. City and Townsite of Aspen as presented at the October 27,1999 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 3. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 4. The applicant shall submit more detailed information as to the window manufacturer, dimensions, etc. for review by staff and monitor as part o f the building permit. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of October, 1999. Approved as to Form: David'Hoefer, Assisti~Ttit,¥Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 111'111111111'111111111 lilli 11'11111111111 lilli lili lili 437888 11/12/1999 09:43A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 of 3 R 15.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO r / 1' / W{/W v 'T ' Suzanhih ~,{d, Chairm~A ' ATTEST: 14:0451242,1~ Kathy Strick}Ad, Chief Deputy Clerk 111111111111 mi ll'1111111111111 lilli '1111111 lill illl 437688 11/12/1999 09:43A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 3 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ORDINANCE No. 16 (SERIES OF 1998) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR AN HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT AT 114 NEALE AVENUE/17 QUEEN STREET (PARCEL 1, OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO) ASPEN, COLORADO, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4.11 OF THE ASPEN CITY CHARTER This ordinance has been adopted as an emergency ordinance in accordance with Section 4.11 of the City of Aspen Charter. The facts showing such urgency and need are set forth below. WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 26.88.030(A)(2) and (5) and 26.72.010(G) of the Municipal Code, an Historic Landmark Lot Split is a subdivision exemption subject to review and approval by City Council after obtaining a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission (hereinafter HPC); and WHEREAS, the applicants, Henry and Lana Trettin, have requested to split the 21,161 square foot parcel to create two separate single-family residential lots of 6.001 square feet and 15, 160 square feet; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.72.010(G) of the Municipal Code, the HPC reviewed the request for the historic lot split at a properly noticed public hearing on May 13,1998 and recommended, by a vote of 6-0, approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has reviewed the application and recommended approval of the Ilistoric Landmark Lot Split. with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the subdivision exemption under the applicable provisions of Chapters 26.88, of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered those recommendations made by the Community Development Department, and the I Iistoric Preservation Commission. and has ta.ken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Historic Landmark Lot Split. with conditions. meets or exceeds all applicable development standards of the above referenced Municipal Code sections; and WHEREAS, the City Council has declared an emergency in accordance with Section 4.11 of the City of Aspen Charter; and 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 lili lili 440652 02/18/2000 11:15A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 1 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: That the City Council does hereby declare an emergency pursuant to Section 4.11 of the Aspen City Charter for the preservation of public property, health, peace and safety of the City of Aspen and its citizens inasmuch as the applicant has represented that the consummation of a sale of the property is contingent upon receipt of final land use approval on or before May 28, 1998, and applicant was inadvertently misinformed by City staff and final approval could be obtained from the Historic Preservation Commission. Section 2: Pursuant to Sections 26.88.030(A)(2) and (5), and Section 26.72.010(G) of the Municipal Code, and subject to those conditions of approval as specified herein, the City Council finds as follows in regard to the subdivision exemption: 1. The applicant's submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and evaluation for approval; and 2. 1 he subdivision exemption is consistent with the purposes of subdivision as outlined in Section 26.88.010 of the Municipal Code. which purposes include: assist in the orderly and efficient development of the City; ensure the proper distribution of development encourage the well-planned subdivision o f land by establishing standards for the design of a subdivision; improve land records and survey monuments by establishing standards for surveys and plats; coordinate the construction of public facilities with the need for public facilities; safeguard the interests of the public and the subdivider and provide consumer protection for the purchaser; and, promote the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen. Section 3: Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 2, above, the City Council does hereby grant an subdivision exemption for 114 Neale Avenue/17 Queen Street with the following conditions: 1. A subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development and Engineering Departments and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder within one hundred eighty (180) days of final approval by City Council. Failure to record the plat and subdivision exemption agreement within the specified time limit shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall: 1111111111111111111111111111 lilli'11'111111111'Ill'111 440652 02/18/2000 11:15A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 2 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO a. Meet the requirements of Section 26.88.040(D)(2)(a) of the Aspen Municipal Code; b. Contain a plat note stating that development of the new/southerly lot created by the lot split shall be required to mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(c) of the Municipal Code; c. Contain a plat note stating that the lots contained therein shall be prohibited from applying for further subdivision and any development of the lots will comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; d. The two lots created by this lot split shall have a total allowable base FAR, on both lots combined, equal to 5,290 square feet o f floor area prior to consideration of potentially applicable lot area reductions (i.e., slopes, access easements, etc.). The applicant shall verify with the City Zoning Officer the total allowable FAR on each lot. taking into account any and all applicable lot area reductions. The property shall be subdivided into one parcel (the northerly parcel) of 6,00 1 square feet and a second parcel (the southerly parcel) of 15,160 square feet. Provided it is found by the Zoning Officer that no lot area reductions are required, the maximum allowable FAR on the northerly parcel will be 1,345 s.f. (plus the potential for a 500 square foot floor area bonus if granted by the LIPC) and 3,945 square feet of ftoor area on southerly parcel. The informalion verified by the City Zoning Officer shall be included on the plat, as a plat note; 2. As a minimum, the subdivision exemption agreement shall include the elements outlined in Section 26.88.050 of the Aspen Municipal Code, and shall meet the recording and timing requirements described in Section 26.88.030(A)(2)(e). 3. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on either lot, the applicant shall sign a sidewalk, curb and gutter construction agreement and pay the applicable recording fees. 4. All material representations made by the applicant in this application and during public hearings with the HPC and City Council shall be adhered to and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by HPC or City Council. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 111'1111111111111' 11111 lilli 11111111111111 lilli lili '111 440652 02/18/2000 11:15A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 3 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Section 4: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the 27th day of May, 1998 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall. Aspen Colorado. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 26th day of May, 1998. 4/« .-7 1 1 -d % -- \ ju,-1 1 - , Rakhel Richards, Mayo Pro Tem ' UNd« f 4 thu- £ 4 1 / Ue·/1,41/16*A -'Z ·:Kathryn *tach¢City Clerk col-KKA.5 ': ., j APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4-1~7 f ,ne.€-~ZE+1£ John *forcUter. City Attorney FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 27th day of May, 1998. #94414 R*hel Richards, May~Pro Tem .X OF A ..'... ©AFTESY»-'01 : 1 .1%4_k -. Le·94) 244;l 3 •• t. Kathryn ®K#< City Clerk £ el : 1 ilill" m mil illill lilli im "Ini iii m m lili , '(3*74€ f 440652 02/18/2000 11:15A ORDINANC DAVIS SILVI 4 of 4 R 20.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO lim -111---1-1-lili 11---1111111-1 Page. 1 of 2 535455 03/15/2007 10:27I JAINCE K L DS C-UDILL PITKIA NATY CO R 11.00 0 0.00 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) AND A VARIANCE FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR 114 NEALE AVENUE, LOT 1 OF THE 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN STREET HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 29, SERIES OF 2006 PARCEL ID: #2737-073-80-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Bret Theony. has requested Major Development (Conceptual) for the property located at 114 Neale Avenue, Lot 1 of the 114 Neale/17 Queen Street Historic Landmark Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26,415,070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen I listoric Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The CIPC may approve. disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of a variance from the Residential Design Standards, I IPC must review the application. a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine. per Section 26.410.020.D of the Municipal Code, that the variance would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose o f the particular standard, In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted: or b. le clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie. in her staff report on October 25.2006, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines would be met with restudy of' the design, and recommended a continuance: and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 25, 2006, the I listoric Preservation Commission considered the application. found the application was consistent with the review standards and "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That 1-IPC hereby grants approval for Major Development (Conceptual) and a variance from the Residential Design Standards with the following conditions: 1. The garage is to be moved back to be flush with the face of the Victorian house. 2- The proposed mudroom addition needs to be restudied to expose more of the historic resource. 3. A variance from the requirements for placement of a garage as expressed in the Residential Design Standards is granted. 4. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension o f the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on 1be 25th day of October, 2006. Approved as to Form: 0 J Jr David Hoefer''AsiNG;*bity Attorney Approved as to content: HISP?INC l'RESERVATION COMMISSION Jeffre~ Iialferty, Chair ATUST; h<,7.,1-4-1 Kathy striticlind, Chief Deputy C]brk 1 111111 11111111111 1-111 Illiti 'I llilill' ll illi illj 1111 535455 Page: 2 of 2 03/15/2007 10:27f JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUN-Y CO R 11.00 D 0,00 RECEPTION#: 584275, 11/11/0011 at 12:24:26 PM, 1 OF 2, R $16.00 Janice K. Vos Caudill, P in County, CO A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) FOR 114 NEALE AVENUE, LOT 1 OF THE 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN STREET HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 17, SERIES OF 2007 PARCEL ID: #2737-073-80-001 WHEREAS, the applicant. Bret Theony, has requested Major Development (Final) for the property located at 1 14 Neale Avenue, Lot 1 of the 114 Neale/17 Queen Street Historic Landmark Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Final Major Development Review, the 1 1PC must review the application. a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Ilistoric Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.4.b of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove. approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated February 28,2007, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation I)esign Guidelines were met. and recommended approval: and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 28, 2007, the }listoric Preservation Commission considered the application. found the application was consistent with the review standards and -City of Aspen 1 listoric Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of 5 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I hal HPC hereby grants approval for Major Development (Final) with the following conditions: 1. The proposed mudroom addition is not approved due to its lack of adequate separation and compatibility with the historic house. 2. The parking arealcurb cut along King Street must be abandoned and returned to landscaping. 3. A variance from the requirements for placement of a garage as expressed in the Residential Design Standards was granted at Conceptual approval. 4. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. RECEPTION#: 584275, 11/11/n011 at 12:24:26 PM, 2 OF 2, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pi n County, CO 5. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full board. 5. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 6. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 7. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 28th day of February, 2007. Approved as to Form: ~m True, Special Counsel Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESE119'I'10!g;UMMISSION A 0{2/ fu L c Jeffre,44*Afefty, Chair d.,1. Avddl V.5 ATTEST: Kathy Str4kland, Chief Deputy Clerk FORUM PHI KING STREET 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 R (866) 770-5585 ~ EDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT --. 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 0-2.4 -- 114 Neale Avenue NEW CONCRETE WALK - Aspen, Colorado 81611 -r- EXISTING: EXISTING - --- 44«.MA-Atir- \ ~ (71 - 1- \\ u -<\0·492\>~ LIGHT \ \~ UTILITIES (TO BE \~ \ TO BE \\~\---23>~ED<BURIED ~ \ 1 0/72 h L 1 1 / 1 \ 11\4494/It« i 10' WIDE DITCH EASEMENT ALONG CENTERLINE \*0\2>\&-13 + 7.34 \#* ti-i/~...· -'--4 C /44:642.- 1 L -- 0 0 r EXISTING CULVERTED DITCH - I CONSULTANTS / O 0 0 SURVEYOR -\0 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. -79 --1 w 11 2-9 N Il~ 1 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET P~OSED~ 0 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ke,/2 = h'~O f ~- PARKING . 0 P (970) 925-3816 j R (970) 925-3816 PROP*ED ; 1. 1 - -*\ \ i X,/--FE¤959 1 CIVIL 1 TBD ..1 nd' 1 1\ I 4-5. 1 ..tio /' 1 : - GEOTECH HP GEOTECH I. ~. 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 1./ 5 - 1% li m GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 P: (970) 945-7988 r- 1 \ F: (970) 045-8454 \x '4'-1 '; '11 2 r -,fTh i <-71.. I j--t\ -- - ~ 144\ STRUCTURAL 1 1 1.1-7 ... 7.i-li~-'·12..J[.lur '.., TBD 0 . 14\\14 1% 1 51 \\64\\V \1 /1 in 1 1 1 \A \\\h,1, ' - ' 1 \\ 4 »» CONTRACTOR A . > 1-~-1'LI ' O" L PROPOSED ~~ ~ \\\\\\\ TBD FIREPIT \11 \\ \\\\\\\\ PROPOSED U \ \\ \\\\\\\ FENCE \\9 \9 4 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION ~911 12--4.- \\\ f\\ A (D - 4 6 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 % il ./ --- SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. It SETBACKS, TYP // 22+Ke - --- ---- \ 4/1 ,% PROJECT NO: 1211 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC /1 DRAWN BY: EAH .-~- PROPERTY L/NE, TYP - - PUMP \1 HOUSE .-.-.. EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" SHEETTITLE AO.01 SITE PLAN 0 . . . >11¥AA 313MONOO ONI IX3 3AN3AV 31V3N 0.~ N?37 FORUM PHI /21 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen Colorado 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F (866) 770-5585 B 3.01 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 1==1 4 33 - GYM CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR I B ¢ ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 /31 P: (970) 925-3816 €33~ BEDROOM SUITE * F (970) 925-3816 it CIVIL 0 TBD 4 - /// 21 wo=r, 01 GEOTECH 7·~ HP GEOTECH . 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 P: (970) 945-7988 F (970) 045-8454 STRUCTURAL tr22-*fl}:0~ j'A}'29822€ TBD CONTRACTOR TBD MEDIA ROOM 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION BEDROOM SUITE SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. PROJECT NO 1211 -tly- DRAWN BY: EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC B 3.01 SUBGRADE 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEETTITLE Al.01 FLOOR PLANS 0 0 . . FI69 FORUM PHI pir. /2/ 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 B 3.01 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 POWDER CONSULTANTS GAME ROOM SURVEYOR & BAR AREA ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P (970) 925-3816 f EKT621 BEDROOM SUITE ~ R (970) 925-3816 CIVIL 2 ---*.- TBD ~ «V/LI ./../et GEOTECH HP GEOTECH 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 \\ h GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 \\ P: (970) 945-7988 F (970) 045-8454 0 TBD STRUCTURAL F DOG WASH r=-1 0 r & 4 CONTRACTOR OWNER'S TBD GARAGE g GARAGE 3 5'-11" ¢ A . 1 .. 7-6-------- -IM [70------1--71 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION 1 1 1 \ / 11 \ / 1 BEDROOM SUITE \ / 1 \ / 1 1 \ / 1 \ I 1\/1\/ . l Ei 1 1 1 El /\ / \ 1% 1 / \ 1 / \ 1% I \ 1 1 / \\ I'll ./ , .57" , 1 / \ 10 / \ -1 -- - --- -- --vi *12 SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. PROJECT NO 1211 DRAWN BY: EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC B 7 a 3.01 LOWER LEVEL 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEETTITLE Al.02 FLOOR PLANS .... - --49--Ittmia & .%22&* I 4 4%:Mit:. ¢ FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 B / 21 9 3.01 .r*=17 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 =================== po .................. Eamman EE.EE. EEE EE:EEE. EE:.EE ~ POWDER - .................. .................. .................. 1---*, STORAGE ,!f--n„ KITCHEN A --16\ FIREPLACE - 1 CONSULTANTS LIVING ROOM E SURVEYOR ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET 1,5 P: (970) 925-3816 DECK 0: ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ?55 /31 02 EXT'677 F: (970) 925-3816 1% Wj CIVIL TBD P 1- 11 1 A2.01/ GEOTECH HP GEOTECH 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 DECK GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 P: (970) 945-7988 F: (970) 045-8454 STRUCTURAL TBD CONTRACTOR TBD GREEN ROOF it 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION MASTER SUITE 1 \ SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. PROJECT NO: 1211 -N12.02 DRAWN BY. EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC B 7 A'\ 3.01 3.01 MAIN LEVEL 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET TITLE Al.03 FLOOR PLANS .... 114r-7/--/ FORUM PHI /21 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 Aspen1 Colorado 81611 P (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue ~13 \ \' Aspen, Colorado 81611 \ 99\94\ \\\\ F 1 \\ 9 0 1 \\9 3 4 1 \\ I 2-1.-9, f 1. i EXISTING 1 f. -rad--1 SLOPE 1 \\\\\\ 1 \\\\\ \\\\\ 1.-3 .1 4 -4 \ r\\ \ , \\ 4 7-1 1 4 $ 1 al *4 1 - A--4 ~/ ~ ~-- , 1.1.i 1 1--f t-t' l. 1 -7 1-f -3--1 r--1 13 b...u ~~~4 -111 -;' 1-1-4 ' 1 44-41-1- , 2=-f-i % r p : / ~ 2, b _i 111 -F - r-r r ' ) - 'i I : ~ ~ I l f-F_fl~~1 f. -' [·L.1 + t.~..f[- CiFT ~ I t._1 Lif·' L.. 321/4 r- r 2 4 i , 1-~ ' 61- lf--1 04-3(.tuf 1 [ -1 - 1 ..It Fi-,-'...--1-~ JU{ Ll-1.3 CONSULTANTS -1 1[- 1 ,-1. C.... ' .. 6 -61.Lt · ... -11-1 .. 520 -1.1... ril .1.- 11." fl SURVEYOR i X -1 U.1 0 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. '-] ' EXISTING Ir~11 SLOPE IL=11 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET O ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 i ' T~-I·, 71 -f :-t-.1 1 P (970) 925-3816 1 Ha ~2527 -if '~-1~-----11 gir ILM . ! 4 1 1 90 11- ]; b- t Vt.< F: (970) 925-3816 X -1 pu --1-11......L LU CO -. i. 1 ***TKI I CIVIL ...3 7 - 1 1 i 111 : ii I! L I , Ill-1 ] -1€\\\ \\ TBD ! ' 1-4 -T -2 ,~r- ~~._~'[-· ·f-1 ~1-1.,--~.1 % /1 -4 01 1-. f HY- .1-1- 11 \ \\ J -43-4-1 \ . 7 D- ~ 4-4 4--5 r · ...i GEOTECH A2.01 -I »« p 4-94 EXISTING , A-Fit i SLOPE 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 1- J - -- r HP GEOTECH GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 P: (970) 945-7988 3 h 4 t-- 1. 2 I i 4 - . --- -,- - I „-. \\ \ F- (970) 045-8454 , J i _ 4 M --967.i . fr[ - j ) STRUCTURAL TBD \ \\ % \\ \ /\\\ 1 \ 25\ I 1 CONTRACTOR \ \\ TBD \ \\09\ \\ \ 4 . \ A \\ \\ \\ 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION U \ \ \\ \\ SD 1 /9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. PROJECT NO 1211 /41L DRAWN BY EAH COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC ROOF 1/4" = 1'.0" SHEETTITLE Al.04 ROOF PLAN .... FORUM PHI J.,2-*Il=33--~-24-132«I-1-HT-ki-J-U-- ~.Eli--LJ _i~ZZ-,613.-n~. unuid-p«=-Fj, -r ·~' · 1 -I~--F-J~----T- ~~71]~ 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 7.---1- 11 -U-2 -· 1 -11 ~ - - L -3.-=-7-1 - Aspen, Colorado 81611 --- P: (970) 279-4157 R (866) 770-5585 - 7 - 114 NEALE r/FF~.P)%-- - Don & Ann Short \3 114 Neale Avenue Il ' I l l l I l l l 1----illl! Ill~'Illl[IlllI~ r----1 1fh 3. 4**AN,h:!11!:!1!11.vil-1.'Ii,iE.iN£1:1!3.1111 .1,111.1..1.11·1111 1111 111111111'11111 ' 111'111 111' 11111!1111' 1.-- -2.-T- =7 2222*9=== Aspen, Colorado 81611 --- 5. - -1-'.- i l 1 1 -- 1 1 f I'. V /.c. / ~ I 1 .4 49//29, . B, ill . 11&*lil . i 1 /43095//7 1 1 \ W//4//4//4//4//4/lm"& 1 . ii 1; i # ,# 1%%1 / \1/ 1 9 /*/u//NIAN//AP//b fl / ;-/· CONSULTANTS A# --%//EN - 11 1 1 11 11' 1 .\1 -/ M ~ ~~3 1 11 1 . I \ 1 l.. #<1% \ i 1 .. K.: 9//2//07//2//A 3 / ./ ./. . \ / 1 1 / lA ./ 9 /5 A , ".' ".'. ,"' ".: '.'.,"' ''.' I ' . .. ' 5 ...; J . / h' 4% .\ SURVEYOR ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 2.1 NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P (970) 925-3816 F: (970) 925-3816 CIVIL TBD GEOTECH HP GEOTECH 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 P (970) 945-7988 F: (970) 045-8454 STRUCTURAL BUILDING MATERIALS LEGEND TBD 1. CONCRETE 2. GLASS -122 - CONTRACTOR 3. STEEL Il [i -7- TBD ..w-''~ ~'2- _2---lif-I---EFILL-- _„-„-1.-ITII*-i-;-7- -1 4. WOOD PANEL ' - 5. EXISTING CLAPBOARD TO REMAIN 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION 7 7- Tu , [i -931» -4» E»=fy 5 =I J. --- - 6-7 6-7 SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. ----- ·-. ..1.=.:-~ 2 h. V.-ee- /- '55F%%~avit _- PROJECT NO 1211 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC 1 i /29 DRAWN BY: EAH .Sky ~. 4 ./ IN //131/ E /Ell l/Al /Hil lilli 1 Il /' \407/ 49 . {: . / 1 WEST 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEETTITLE A2.01 ELEVATIONS . FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street Suite 202 Aspen, Colorado 81611 P: (970) 279-4157 F (866) 770-5585 114 NEALE une=.222= =-=·L 7 0 - '. - 2~1'fl'*'fi~~ici~ ~i;fir#Ii I 1 k 111 111111 Ill 11 11111'llill ll ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ' 3- Don & Ann Short ri ' ' fi·11.111 11'?1 1111 lu 114 Neale Avenue 11 lili 1.11 l illi lilli lilli ll'll 1111'11111 11 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1 U E In»-C 4 2 +1 *-1 6 2. 1, \ --TI«-f- 1. 1 \ \ \ \ / \ /\\ I I \ f / \ / \ \ .9--- & \ \ \ 2 \ CONSULTANTS \ / \ / \ I \ I \ / 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET 5 SURVEYOR \ \ / \ / \ I / / ~ < ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC , 2001 / j , \ / / 5% ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1 1 1 1 , * ~ / / 6 P: (970) 925-3816 \/ / 1 1 /1 1/ R (970) 925-3816 CIVIL 4 SOUTH 1/4" = 1'-0" 4.1 SOUTH 1/4" = 1'-0" TBD GEOTECH HP GEOTECH 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 P (970) 945-7988 E (970) 045-8454 STRUCTURAL BUILDING MATERIALS LEGEND TBD 1. CONCRETE 2. GLASS \ 3. STEEL CONTRACTOR TBD 4. WOOD PANEL 5. EXISTING CLAPBOARD TO REMAIN 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION i it'inliMMMI l.,p 'H littilt'th 111, il'l:,,1„ 1\1111 '1' 1 1 1 , , - 2. 1 SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. 1.04 1 .1-. .4 4 1 //Aft/ke//41, 49 1 \//»6>,axy« / 299, PROJECT NO 1211 k ni~ / ftffj / /i ~ 3 3/ ««-- 1 DRAWN BY: EAH / t. =.: 7/ / /' 'AN / / 447 W I « ----PWAR I / / h- / U N / k COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC Of ~ «-9 l O f~ ~ ht Ir .- /lkillitl /i~I "h 9 7 9 -9/2. i 29 i l hy««444--~ 4~~ /««//22//««/ / /299// //04 /~//2«//40 /»u//271 J »-7 i al If EN El Ellaill 1»1 lit i Kid 3 EAST 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET TITLE A2.02 ELEVATIONS . 1.4 4 41 0 117 South Spring Street, Suite 202 3. FORUM PHI Aspen, Colorado 81611 / P: (970) 279-4157 F: (866) 770-5585 4. 2. «-1 4- - 7 114 NEALE Don & Ann Short 114 Neale Avenue \ - ,-9- Aspen, Colorado 81611 /91«4) /31 1 1 1 /0 1 3 / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ hy // 4/ i. -1- E- 1 ~ ~.~i ti, .. .4 = CONSULTANTS mil a~ 5/.//"/lit~, SURVEYOR 322/.1 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. L 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET 9// 69// Au rit/Azy, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 P: (970) 925-3816 full; 2//m//gog / F (970) 925-3816 7// \ CIVIL TBD 18 SECTION 1/4"=1c=0" GEOTECH HP GEOTECH BUILDING MATERIALS LEGEND 5020 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 P: (970) 945-7988 1.CONCRETE F: (970) 045-8454 - --- 7 -- - -LT- - - -,--rEI~_~1 =~ -7- .T_IIUILLITFILFEZE----_ -7~_IL.,_1-032_,-C© 2. GLASS STRUCTURAL I -_-2 TBD 3. STEEL 1 4. WOOD PANEL 5. EXISTING CLAPBOARD TO REMAIN «-I CONTRACTOR 1.-- TBD 5, H El - - 1/10/2013 DATE OF PUBLICATION \ / - DO -- i SD 1/9/13 HPC CONCEPT. REV. Nlifil---i ---Ob %4 / / s 1 41 0. / Ml ·· 1/ PROJECT NO 1211 DRAWN BY: EAH /4 a \ 'I ~- :VAN \ \ V Illfil 4 \ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI, LLC 5: \ I \ ) i 1 Mi 1 / 7/ 8 1 1 $ / / d- - ~ /U SHEETTITLE 1 1 - I Im luout, »«74 \ 1 i. 1. . /X\ A3.01 / A SECTION 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTIONS .... .... „0-, L = „8/ L hiv=1 13A31 NIV[Al SNOI1V1A01¥0 ¥3hIV BOO-I=I 111 '11'"/1 €C/- 1.11,1,111.111 I 9 (] OZO 929 gz jed '( U bs 92 LOZ - U bs 92 LEG) u bs gee si eeje >pep elqejunoo @41 ZO OZ '( 1 bs 92 Log) SNoep 101 uoildluexe elqemolle ell} 5uikidde Jeuv U bs 92 zes SI )pep leAel Ulell] 841 (9 9 a 010 929 91 Jed 'suolleinoleo eue ~ 3 > 3333 3 333 2333 333 3 ~1-I 11~,1 rl t**21*h I~ + 1 -·. 77 4-0 4 . 9 7.1 1,11;~2- JOOL U.loJJ jdulexe si pue epei6 pallslult Jo salloul O€ Ull]11/IA SI (,9 9-,9 X .9 6-,0 L) 4PJod :u04 U bs 69 Gill (d &55555,:35:555555555 rll'I]}-11'T'' 11 ,"21 1h':F~r''Il ni~lklieL-~1:Jitil' Ut~ [e@Je JOOU ssoJO Jo (92£ LEE'L = U bs SL@ 1,21 + u bs g 961/0 ~2222%23343332~iRitUri li; -~cne*ikllil-(i =;'12130-4124~1~21-4-7=1-12 u bs 92£ LES' L x 0/*6 64 U bs 39 96£ St e@Je .loop leAal JaAAO] elqejunoo JO lunolue eli 1 '@JOJeJelll P C] 010 9Zg 92 jed 'e@Je Jooll UIOJJ Idwexa @JoJ@Jawj 1 0 OZO 929 93 jed C U bs GL61,ZL =Z/ U bs SL 643 =091 - U bs 92 66,) Sl pue 'eaJe JOOIJ alqeaolle lunluixelu s,Apedoid @41 Jo %91 UN SS@1 91 )13@p leAel U]eW U bs 06 @41 (31 311ll 133HS -i. . ~,1 /////////// A 611!11'- U bs 928 VEL si @Seiefi alll Joi l@Ael JeAAol 841 01 peppe eeie Jooll pellunoo 841 11 bs ssoib SL 66* si aDeJee ell.L 9 0 OZO 929 93 Jed 'ee.te 'I'L l' Itlti-r,-+pr -1--t£rt=" 1 %46 61 Jo 'eele Ile/A pesodxe JO U bs 91 86*41IAA 'eele lieAA lejol 10 U bs +99' L sell leAel JeAAO1(3 10011 luou jdulexe si pue epeJB pat'Stull JO SellOUI O€ Ull'VAA SI ("s 9-,9 X „96-,OL) LImod Wo-4 U bs 69 941(3 1,1111 11 // /tfij)9* 1,~441 t~*,1.11 - 1 Flill' ,1 " A -r--r" (eme Joolisso,6 Jo u bs gL OOZ' L x %1 Z) U bs z, L£ Sl eeJe Jooll epeJOqns elqejunoo Jo lunolue ell: 'eJOJeJ@41 (eeie JOOU JO U bs 91 :88 x %6 91) U bs 686 951 si eaie Jooll ieAel JeA,ol eiqejunoo Jolunoule 941 'eJOJGJe41 j ' 11,1, g.g Z Jo 'eme ileAA pesodx@ 10 U bs 9 g€ l,Ill~,A 'eefe ile/A leiono U bs k69' L sell leAai epei6qns %6 91 -10 eme ileAA pesodxe 10 U bs 08€ 411/'A 'eaie ile,IA le]01 Jo u bs 93 9ZZ' L sell leAal JeAAO-1 111 (/ ,1 11'111,<1 lili 111, 8 a OZO GLS 93 Jed 'emgod)(a ile/A JO % UO peseq jurloo o; seeje Jooll le/,el Je/Aoll pue epe,Oqns ((] 8 0 010 gig gz jed 'einsodxe iteM 10 % uo peseq tunoo 01 eeJe JOOU leAel JeMO-I (a I lili 111'111 1 i 1 1 E a OZO 929 93 Jed 'sleAe-l Jer,0-1 pue epei6qns uo junoo siielS (O E C] 030 929 92 led 'I@Ael le/Aol uo lunoo sileE b - - n- 2~ 1:[ 3/-4-WJ=LMAn*ZAF=F %00 L le pepnioui 51 ee-le ieolu %00 L le pepnioui si eaie ieoiuelloeu,I/aDe-Jols el,U- (8 e40eu,1/86ejols ela (8 Ill'lli 0352 - H: Ill '1--4*=-3#EL-41' rl //./// " f/'11/j \ eN¥ 10-1 SSOJE) LUOJJ emv 10-1 leN elll eonpej jou op suoippuoo edols 5uilsixe Jell; epeul ueeq sell jserbel v eal¥ 10-1 SSOJO LU04 eel¥ 10-1 leN @41 03npeJ jou op suoijipuoo @dols bullsixe lell; epeul uaeq sell ;senbei v a / 355>~< =tiwl ~-04»M-»=71" WN/Ul„,4,„j,„/ . smoluoo ouols,4 431eul lou op pue epeul-uelu @Je eselll lr,q 'sadols %00-03 sepnioui mis 941(v Smoilloo Quots'4 40 leul lou op pue apeul-ueul eje esell; ;nq 'sedois %O£-03 sepnpul ells 841 (v hIVJ bunsixa Joi selo N 1 1 Ill ·w/////////14/////// .1 hivd Pasoaoid Joi salo N 9.8'B snuoe pa}senbabl ile/,7///1 ,)%U///l//,\- 1 1·111 1 1 ...+ 2////////2/////1// 1 JeUV ea'V - 177-. - 'th, loold alqeMOII¥ 111 111 /X///A ./1////////Oil/////1 /1 ****.*B 011 'IHd INANO=I 1HDIUAdOO ~ ~ -- <flfifffiffiffftfitfffft~tfffFffiffit[[jj»jj~j -1«Ut - - *55555>1 27-7 U ~Ds *g·EZZ'L le,01 -uts,L £1.04 1401 009 snuos ee.iv Joolil Joi jsenbell ///////////, M/////////////////////////\A///// 1/-1"-2 0 '_1 HV3 ASI NAAVM D : ~3"~ 3 90~ /3 193 -2 3 55.~~ 9 3 4 3 323326553« 32€36353 -~NE€f //0/55«40*EM*»Q~»111 40'od/s)1000 40.lod/s)1300 92 loz 4000 LLEL ON 103TONd /iii// jdu,exa elqemoilv 1/1/ //////1///// 1////1/1/1//////////A///1/// 1 - 1111'?1111}3!j,4 4,9,09 abeJee 0€'L ea'V 111!11 lili lilli , /////////////A////1/// \ (Bale leAel JeMOI U ebejee Jooi:I aiqe,Aoliv //////////,//////////////////////////.,/ /1.//////// ~ /////////////////////////////////////////U//////// 1 pepnioul u bs 928 DEL) A)El ldBONOO OdH £ 1/6/ L as '//////'////////////////////,//////1////\A%,t„,I' , ~it ./-/7.7-0//4-33332339513iagEREE, leAel Jeddn imal Jaddn L00'9 9814 10-1 SSOJO /////////Ff ///////. , 21 d !,1/1,/1 "\A///1//J 92 9ZZ leAel UIEW LOO 9 Be'V 30-1 WN i ////////AX////7/// /1/111 Ah////f// 9 896 18Ael uieIN f . / .// / dll. ./ I ./ -.7,Im ,...'}11 1 1 1 1 1 1 N. / / / It / / ////////// W .- 29 96£ leAel JOMol 66 9€E PAD-1 JOAAO1 eoueptsea Allu,led 316UIS jueutdoleAea r,1/,/?~ i<w- - / ,////// I U pasodoid - U '42 ij IN i, RN< I i. 0143, apeubqns -Nkecl\\\\\\\%'' /./.##P Ef ZE ape,6qns @Ou@plsabl Allule: 810UIS juallidoleAea 5 unsixa suoijeinoleo eeiv JOOId peSOaOJd suoileinoleo eeiv 10013 buljs!x3 ¥9 L-El 6uluoZ „0-, L = „9/ L hiv=I 13A31 hl3MO1 suolleinoleo eeiv Joold eleeN *I, L NOLL¥0I1€Ind 30 31¥0 ELOZ/0 L/L b? 9 7 9 f $345*LIL . 11. w 1,0-,92 Illitl A·K >~~ 7 44 /4 /> -~ lilli[ lilli' 1 1 lillit lillill a8i . \ /7///////.///////// 111t11IttII1II1II, % MO10VhllNOO 1,1,11,111111!11,11 94 lilli 11,1111 1111111 I 1111111111111111,1 11111t11111111111l '111'1111111 lilli A 111111111 111101}11 ./ t i 11 It1} 111I ,/1/Ill 1111!11 1/1 '11 1,11 4 titill''i,tilt:;',I '.lili ililli' iii' r. 4- It' 1, Itt : 1 1 1 ,1 1 ./ /////////////// 031 111'111 1 . I . . ?1,1}/ 1 1 t11 ''i 1 /1 111 11 f „€-19 ' 1 1 ,/11 11 1VhlnlOnUls , 111114 1 4 'i' 3 1 1/111,1 IlIlIIIiI1I // ///1///// / 4 4 *948-9#0 (026) 3 111111'11 11 I b 1111' }11' Il ./ 8862.-St76 (026) d 11111]1 1 1 1 11i' Itlt 2 1 1111111111 11,+1 L09 Le OO 'SONINdS DOOMNE-19 11//i,/ , .. ' < /1 /'t'/'// lill'Illl,1 lili . lili ,1 1111/11/11 a. aVOU A-LNROO 0309 4, / / b -9%5 2 ~ 1 [11111/1 11,1111'11 I1l11111 111' 111 H031039 dH :U - - .-I 1,11'111 Illit/11 '11 -- 1[ ,1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 4 ////////////// H031039 / ' / 4 ////////V /////7///// 1111'11'11/lilli' l1'1I1IIII!III[ 1 l 111111111 1111111 1111]111:'I 111'11'llilli 111~ "/////////42»y///////////1//////I////////// 5 1// 1///// ////1 //&/'/1 13.-I ' "/:'/'/$//'/ //'#/ 1,11'11 1, 111,}1111),11, L'1 1111,>11,1111111„lilli!11 111,1,2111!11 1,1111/111/1111#j r 1.1··f 111'1111/Ill'llil,1111111!11111/1/ 11111!1 11111 i/ ·flltll'!11111111/Ill!11111111}Illill/Ii 111'll' 1/1/1111 11111,11111111'111111111'111"111111111 111111 11II11111,1 I!111ilit I~il"'il/'"t'~1/tiltjilti ~~1 6 L 9 9 £ E L IIIIIIlIIllI11II1lII1ll1IIIIIIIlI!1 //////1////////// 2 07 7/ I I!Ii1II1IIIIIIIII1I!1I1!II1I,I1I1 I j!!)111111)1'J J/,1 : . .-r. D ' 11*191 ' , , 1 £-LL . 4 , 111I11#1111'#jj1111 'lilli 1 :1 11 1/////I/////////// A 0 llc, 131 „L-,EL „2.-1 L .281 L-,1.10 ' fitd t 1,0-192 11111111111¢1111 1.1. <,/1,11/j/ 07////////////, -2 \ f , . i,Z-,69 081 ////////////////Ah 1)9'09 944"MUNG' 1 1 94- 1 111111111, 1111111'tilt ,/1, 11111111/1 f//'/ ///t//l/ //'/,r I I . :I ..... . . ' 'i,34¥.'i'.- ' I lilli1 111I11111l11111111111111I11 lilli'11111/11 1111 ./ 1IAIO '111,1111111,111/11/11//11,111111;11 1 ·43 4 ubsooLLL G ubss£6ZE - 111)sgzmt 111,1,,111,111,11111/1111,/I,1,{11, k I , 1%79. . - f & 12')71. i 1 1/!111'111'1111/11111111 1[1111 1 1 CO 1 § I 11 I 1 I+ 11111 1 I1111,11 I 11 I 1i1 I 11 , ./ . 1 /''t'111//t//II,I/I unnunn 11 1 .//./////// 0 2 1. 2,1. 91.8£-936 (026) 3 !11111/lilli#lilliff!11111"Illili ' - 11/111,111111#11111,j,1111#1111111 j ,1 t1111111111 U bs 92. 69 K 26 u bs 09 OE L ubs 91,09 S - Q ubs c £ gc Ubs 09 EZZ 1111111111111!1111111111111111111 11, ////////////// -1 - Ll-1-1-1 91.99-926 (026) d Il 11/1/lilll'll!11/1111/11'111 , ....../.......&. /3 1 1111111,1111/1111111!111"lili '111 111111'11 11111 - 4 u bs 93 9 L U,9 I,9 Oa¥230103 'N3dS¥ 1//2/11/+ 2/ ' / ! %/1 !?11 1/1 111% , //////~///////// ~- - UbsgLE:* .1 61 7 p'1111111 '1"ll"ilitilli I'llill[/1/Ill Ill , u bs gE Ze 133W1S VN31¥9 HlnOS OLE (11/11 . - 1/1,1/1/111,1 /1,1, I. I. I I I,£1111111,1111,1 ///////////////// " 1 -t /4 . 55'' ' u bs 91 L L 46 4// L lilill lili)11 1 . »Xy/ 4/ 4 1 - U MoglE- U bs Aft'77 -j ONI '9833NION3 ABAk:InS N3dS¥ 11 111111111!1 . // / // ./ I I lili lillil 1 j I 1111,111 --T 1111111111 i! i I,1 I 11 1 h10*3AhlnS 1 1 i 1/11 i 1 , 111111111, i,It ..1.-131- 4 111,111 J11 11'1111,1 SlN¥110SNOO 6 8 MV=1 30¥hleanS 9 9 f /5/ 10-191 f 1 1 1 , 1 1111 // /// I .../ 11'11'111 1 111 11|t 1||111|1 lili 11111111/ 1,1111 I,11,11 , I 11 t 1111 / 1111 :Ill'+111111/1111111'Itll'll 11111'1Iltll/1 11 l 1 I 111 1 1 lilill Ill,1111!Ill,1111111!I'll)11111'1111111/1 t//1/"| 111111 I,1111111111111111 Ill !!1111,111111'Illill 1/111 Ill•'llilll 1/ 111111111111'Illilll I Ilt;11111111111111 111/Illill/111/Illl 11IIII'11I11„III1II!I111ItI1I[ItII1t,11 lillil Unnunn 'lilli'rlt//1/1/1,11}/1}111)111/1/1111111 £ 11111!ill} Ill 1, lili '111?111/111+111/1,111//1 1/111 '1111'11)%1 tI11IIII!II 11I1Ii Iltill'llt/1111111111111111"lilli!1111 1,1111111 1111111 1111111111'111 11 lilli"II1IIIIIIII1'I1l, 1,/1111% 11111111! 1111111!111111!Illl'll'll/11[1111 '111: '111111 :1/Illilit lili I'lltll'Illl'll,Ill/1111/'11!Illit 111111''Ill/Illilli 11 1 111 lili lillill/Ill!1)11/1 1 11 11 111111 11111, 1%11,1,}Ill 1111/I,Ill Ill Illl11111111111111111111 Illi!1111/I/1111111 ]I1!IiII'I! I!1III !II II1It1Il! III1t1I 1!I11IIIIIIiIItI1I! ''11111,11| 11111111111 lilli 11111'11111 11ItI1II111I1]Il [11 I1111111III1I!11 II11'11tIII"I1I11l INUM'Upunh, tilt lili'11111111111'"'1111111)lilill LI,9I,8 opeloloo 'ueds¥ 11,1 11111[1 1 '1 Illi lll, Il ll I ll,Il l"1111111I ll 111) lilli Illiill I'lill 1/j'11111#Tll/,11/1/111111;/1/1,/11} 1 11'11111 1 1 111111 1,1111 1!1111111111111111 lilli 111111 1 , )11?111,111###1111,111111"'11,11/11 enueAV eleeN *1,1. 1 lili ' 11 lil li 1111 li lli,1 111111 1 11111.11 1 1:11 Illl#1111111/Illi'lilili 1]ililli' 1, 111 '' 1 , '11/Illil111!11''ll'll 1-I/]11111 i UOUS UU¥ 9 uoa i 1 I I 1 i , A-L , / 1 l ! 11111 I 11 111?ic 1////////// I 11'111111 1 4 .///1//1./. . .._r. I 1; 111 I 1j /1 , ///// / 1 7////// 111 I 11111111 1 I J...1. r . 31¥3N #LL . ./ // /1-247 lili 1/11 1 11 [{11 1&11 111 1 l 1 i t 1 I 1@ ! l 11 i 1 , 411] 1 1,11,1,11111''I+01/1/1/11,11" 01 ///////////./, I Lili 111,11111111,11111111#11111111'll /'1111?11111,1, 111I1It'II111I1ttII1I11IIII!iIII1IIIII1I 1,11'111111'lilil~ 111111,11I!1111It111!i 1111I 11!111 1 1111111111111111111% I 'H 1111,111„lillil ?1111/11111111,13 IIII1I11tlII1IIl11IIII, , lilli Ililli#1111111 111 ? 11'11111111/111 1 1 J,1,//#/1 1 1111,11111%11'1111 9899-02 (999) 3 29 L 9-62 (026) d ' I 1111111 i 11 I 11 111'11'1111'111 'lilli'1111I1I111 111111111111}11 1 , ll/1/,1111 Ill/111/111111111 r. Ituuuttle' , 11,111,111,111,11 )/11#11111!11%!/ LL9L8 opeJoloo 'uedsv L -<~ik '~~ ~ ""' f' 1#,1 1~|'1111|11,2/"'11|i Il!11%1111/111;1 11 ZOE ming '10849 Buljds wines Z L L lilill'1 1111 1111111111'lilil #111/j 1/11 t 1111 j1 / '1 11111114,11,11,11111111}1111'# 11]11111/Illl,Illl 11i1 111,110,11!11'!ijl¥'*1,1111,1, 111,11111111111111 11111111111'lilliltlilli' 1 '4/11/11 1 ! l 1 J 111111111 t I 11 , IHd WANO=1 Ifill[Illl'llittll/1111,1:11111111'll 1- 1, „8;LL L //////////////////////FINDS 9/2 OOZ/Lan// .///////////////// t.1 Ill'lilill//Illit'll!/ r/ 111'Ill ,11111 '3\ , 9 2 99 k 1111/11'1111/1111111111111111!111tll: 111/11 111'lili lili 4 1 1 4 , a < „L;64 1 9,1 ' , „0-,91 li lli 111111,11 li li -I , 11 : : . O „L-'EL 1''l' 11£-ILL . lie-,9 lit-,91 J I 1 /1, Ill,1111111 lilli 1111 ill l /1/Il l ///////i///////// i 0 / ~ ~~ -~ 1 ~ , , 4 ..d- 111,111111,#111~,1,#111#11lililllili ////1////////1///" i ~ =-7 -1- - , 4,1 -3.:g,% 1 ....$ 1 -'.-4 ' $ I 1 1 lill'ill/11111111111,1111.1111/1 )?},1,1,1, 1%,) '' ilitil,lillillilt,ltliltl,l?tlill,1 <NK 1 1 .- j&*76 :* C 1 .znld.-,1.1. 4, 4 7 + '111,1,!111/111+11/,1111},111111111 .///p/ 1,11 1 08 -4 · II]I1III!IIIttItI/I]ItIII1tIIII"I - t- -. , 4 11111'll:11111[t'Illtill'Ill/1,111 , , 0///////////// 2 · 44 bs 09 Et 14 bs 93 8€1 -~ 1 0 (D IIIIII'lI]tII1I1II1It11I,[III/lilli -/1 '111111111111 -4, u bsgz ELL ; 1 U bs gz 99 L b ut,60999* ubsogILL '* ubsoo(32 · Ubsgz Lzt 1,1111111'11,?!1}1111111'1111lilli I'lili 11111111 11'' 4.1 :) 0 /35€;355555¢~55555555555553¤55555 / 5555555¤55353555~ * . . - . A, - 00 f. 2! ~ 1~-f-I~~~iii~I-i-i~I~~i~ii~lil~~iiiIif~i~~~= Ill/1111111111/1 - 1 UbsgUL #bs* 64 , 4:.r |1|1||11|1|il|#111||1||1||||1/11 I1IIII{l1ItIIItli h J IItI1IIIIiII]III1!1I1/t11II]lI 111/1 /11'1111 11,1/' I. .k ./ I ./ I . I 1/1,'11'11'11111,1/11/#1111111 '1 11 Il ll 11 11111111 Ubs SZ ZL' - !I 1 1111111/111/11111111!111I lilli U. //// // 6 1 1 111111111111111111111111,1111 1 //// i / ""' y ... I /1,11/1,1,; filli; flfilll \ ////////////////////7/ ~.bEL '~ 1111911111tjlltIIi , / !1111!11,111 11# 6 0,9-,L\. 8 A~~A.,t V /« ~ ' »6 A £-,Z L „E-,2 L Ag -1. 10'-91/2·