HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.council.regular.202005121
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
May 12, 2020
5:00 PM, City Council Chambers
130 S Galena Street, Aspen
I.CALL TO ORDER
II.ROLL CALL
III.SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES
IV.CITIZENS COMMENTS & PETITIONS
(Time for any citizen to address Council on issues NOT scheduled for a public hearing. Please
limit your comments to 3 minutes)
Meeting number (access code): 620 499 038
Meeting password: 81611
Tuesday, May 12, 2020
4:30 pm | (UTC-06:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada) | 6 hrs
Join by phone
Tap to call in from a mobile device (attendees only)
+1-720-650-7664 United States Toll (Denver)
+1-469-210-7159 United States Toll (Dallas)
Global call-in numbers
V.SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
a) Councilmembers' and Mayor's Comments
b) Agenda Amendments
c) City Manager's Comments
d) Board Reports
VI.CONSENT CALENDAR
(These matters may be adopted together by a single motion)1
2
VI.A.Resolution #038, Series of 2020 - Adoption of an updated IGA for Mental Health
Services between Pitkin County, the City of Aspen, the Aspen School District and
Aspen Valley Hospital
VI.B.Aspen Water Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) – Phase 1 Update and Phase 2
Contract for Professional Services (Resolution #36, Series of 2020)
VI.C.Draft Minutes of April 28th, 2020
VII.NOTICE OF CALL-UP
VII.A.Notice of Call Up, HPC approval for 134 E. Bleeker Street – Minor Development,
Relocation, and Setback Variations
VIII.FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
VIII.A.Ordinance #06, Series of 2020 – First Reading, 920 East Hyman Avenue,
Establishment of Transferable Development Rights (TDR)
VIII.B.Ordinance #07, Series of 2020 - First Reading of 2020 Spring Supplemental
IX.PUBLIC HEARINGS
IX.A.Resolution #041, Series of 2020 - Extension of Vested Rights Request for Aspen
Valley Hospital (AVH), 401 Castle Creek Road
X.ACTION ITEMS
XI.ADJOURNMENT
2
Page 1 of 3
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM:Richard Pryor, Chief of Police
THRU:Sara Ott, City Manager
DATE OF MEMO:April 17, 2020
MEETING DATE:May 12, 2020
RE:Resolution # 038, Series of 2020, Approving an update to the
Intergovernmental Agreement between Pitkin County, Aspen
Valley Hospital, Aspen School District and City of Aspen for
Mental Health and Substance Use Services
REQUEST OF COUNCIL: Staff requests approval of Resolution # 038, Series of 2020
(Attachment “A”), authorizing the execution of a 1-year intergovernmental agreement
(Attachment “B”) between Pitkin County, Aspen Valley Hospital, Aspen School District, and
City of Aspen to continue offering mental health and substance use services to Pitkin County by
Mind Springs Health in collaboration with Mountain Family Health Centers.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: In December 2017 Council approved an initial IGA for
calendar year 2018 bringing together multiple community stakeholders and respective funding to
collaborate with a single vendor, Mind Springs Health to provide a “Mental Health Continuum
of Care.” The IGA was subsequently approved in April 2019 for 2019 calendar year services.
BACKGROUND: As stated by Pitkin County Health and Human Services staff, “…mental
health and substance use have long been identified as the most significant health issues facing
the people who live, work and play in Pitkin County. High rates of suicide, mixed messages
surrounding the promotion of our ‘party town’, high rates of depression and anxiety, sleep
disturbances, financial pressures, lack of psychiatric care, lack of specialized support for
marginalized populations and the high cost of treatment, as well as other issues have inspired
several different non-profit and private providers to try to step up and respond. The result has
been a community perception of a fragmented and uncoordinated system of care.”
DISCUSSION:
The same partnership is to be continued through 2020 as defined in the IGA, with some
adjustments to cost sharing noted as follows:
1. An additional $33,420 in funds that the City of Aspen has collected through the tobacco
tax. This would be used to increase the funding for a school counselor from a .6 FTE to
a 1 FTE and to have that counsellor assigned to the Aspen School District. This would
3
Page 2 of 3
provide for a total of 2 FTE’s dedicated to the Aspen School District. Interim Aspen
School District Superintendent Tom Heald provided the following comment:
“The additional .4 contribution has been significant in two distinct ways; 1) when
we add the existing .6 fte to this position it elevates the position to 1.0 and allows
us to be able to advertise and offer full time employment that has made it much
easier to attract qualified candidates and 2) our needs exceeded our capacity to
respond in a timely manner in the prior year and we now have the staffing to
respond quickly and efficiently to our students and families in crisis.”
2. An increase of $31,000 from Pitkin County for employee incentives for the three Minds
Springs positions funded through this agreement.
The 2020 cost sharing breakdown is as follows:
Community Mental Health-$171,468
1.0 FTE Licensed Therapist: Rapid Response Mobile Unit Team Member- intensive,
community based, outpatient treatment focused on high risk individuals who might not
come into a clinic setting. Includes case management, therapy services and 1/3 cost of a
vehicle. Intensive Stabilization Program Team Member- after crisis intervention, serve as
a bridge between crisis services and standard outpatient services.
1.0 FTE Case Manager: Rapid Response Mobile Unit Team Member (see above).
Intensive Stabilization Program Team Member (see above).
60 Hours/year of Advanced Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner time for jail: individuals who
need mental health interventions but did not meet the state’s JBBS criteria. Nurse can
prescribe to individuals needing medication management.
Integrated Care Program - $197,818
2.0 FTE Behavioral Health Specialists: This staff will work in the MFHC Basalt Clinic
and expand the current behavioral health program there. They will provide outpatient (6
sessions) services for families, substance use disorders, trauma, hypnosis, animal assisted
and other evidence-based therapies.
2.0 FTE Patient Care Coordinators: will work in the MFHC Basalt Clinic, one will be a
patient educator, and the other a social health advocate. The patient educator will
advocate for the patient and family, facilitating culturally appropriate communication
between patient and providers and will identify and decrease barriers to behavior change
and improve access to needed services. The social health advocate will provide care
coordination to patients who are at most risk for health deterioration sentinel events
and/or poor outcomes. The social health advocate will assess the determinants of health
and assist the patient in addressing barriers and increase access to services.
Tele psych (4 hours) virtual meeting with psychiatrist
School Based Therapists – $155,715
2.0 FTE Aspen School District Therapist: on-site student and family therapy and
4
Page 3 of 3
consultation with school staff to facilitate assessment by a multidisciplinary team
available to all three schools
Incentive program for provider staff - $31,000
Hiring bonuses and housing allowances
At the time of writing, the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners had approved the IGA
at second reading at a public hearing on March 25
th, 2020. The Aspen School District and Aspen
Valley Hospital have also approved this IGA.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS:
This intergovernmental agreement is for a third year of service. Pitkin County will serve as the
fiscal agent through the Public Health Department and a single contract has been executed with
Mind Springs Health as the lead agency for $556,332. Mind Springs Health will then
subcontract to Mountain Family Health Centers. Participating members agree to provide 2020
funding contributions as follows:
Aspen School District $ 40,000
Aspen Valley Hospital $ 73,275
City of Aspen $107,550
Pitkin County Healthy Community Fund $335,507
Total $556,332
Additionally, Pitkin County is providing office space at no cost at the Schultz Health and Human
Services building and Aspen School District is providing office space for a school therapist at the
Aspen Middle School at no cost.
It should be noted that City Council continues to fund approximately $99,000 per annum for the
Human Services Officer (HSO) position within the Aspen Police Department. The HSO works
closely with at-risk populations, including individuals with mental health conditions and has a very
close working relationship with Mind Springs Health in implementing aspects of the Mental Health
Continuum of Care as well as the Co-Responder Program (PACT).
RECOMMENDATION:It is recommended that City Council enter into the intergovernmental
agreement and provide Pitkin County, as fiscal agent, payment of $107,550.
ALTERNATIVES: City Council could elect to revertto asystem of fragmented funding to mental
health and substance use organizations or could elect to not distribute funds to any organization.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Resolution # 038, Series of 2020
Attachment B: Proposed Intergovernmental Agreement
5
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 038
SERIES OF 2020
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING AN
UPDATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL, ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO FOR
MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE SAID DOCUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO.
WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council an updated intergovernmental
agreement for mental health and substance use services, a copy of which document is annexed
hereto and made a part thereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO:
That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves an updated
intergovernmental agreement between the City of Aspen, Aspen Valley Hospital, Aspen School
District, and Pitkin County for mental health and substance use services, a copy of which
document is annexed hereto, and does hereby authorize the City Manager of the City of Aspen
to execute said document on behalf of the City of Aspen.
RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____th day of May 2020, by the City Council
for the City of Aspen, Colorado.
___________________________
Torre, Mayor
I, Nicole Henning, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a
true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen,
Colorado, at a meeting held May ____, 2020.
_____________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
6
1
ATTACHMENT B
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR MENTAL
HEALTH SERVICES AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROVIDED BY MIND SPRINGS
HEALTH (MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES)
THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made this ______
day of ____________________, 2020 by and between the Board of County Commissioners
of Pitkin County, Colorado, whose address is 530 East Main Street, Suite 302 Aspen,
Colorado 81611 ("the County”) and Aspen Valley Hospital ("AVH'), Aspen School District
(“ASD"), and the City of Aspen. (“COA"), and hereinafter severally referred to by name or
collectively as the "Participating Members".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, This Agreement is entered into pursuant to, inter alia,C.R.S. §§ 29-1-201, et
seq.,and Article XIV, Section 18 of the Colorado Constitution.
WHEREAS, Mental Health and Substance Use (“Mental Health”) were again
identified in the 2017 Regional Community Health Assessment as the top health
priority to address for those who live, work, and play in Pitkin County.High rates of
suicide, mixed messages surrounding the promotion of a “party town”, high rates of
depression and anxiety, sleep disturbances, financial pressures, lack of psychiatric
care, lack of specialized support for marginalized populations and the high cost of
treatment, as well as other issues have inspired a number of different non-profit and
private providers to step up and respond. Although there are many assets within the
community along the continuum of care (prevention, intervention, treatment,
aftercare), gaps still remain in the continuum, and some of our most vulnerable, fall
through the cracks.
WHEREAS, Funding stakeholders of Pitkin County engaged in a focused strategic planning
process in 2017 with the purpose of rapidly improving access to Mental Health programs and
services by changing the way funding is allocated to programs. These Funders (Pitkin
County, Aspen School District, Aspen Valley Hospital – “Participating Members”) have
committed to using funding strategically to strengthen the system of care and improve service
delivery.
WHEREAS, Participating Members agreed to collectively pool their funding in 2018 to
support a Mental Health Services proposal submitted by Mind Springs Health and
Mountain Family Health Services (“Vendor”) for specified community mental health, crisis
stabilization, integrated behavioral health care and school based services.
WHEREAS, in 2018, Participating Members participated in quarterly Steering Committees
with the Vendor. The Vendor convened funder organization staff monthly to participate in
both a medical/law enforcement operations group, and a school-based operations group.
Key Performance Metrics were designed and reported on during Steering Committee
meetings.
WHEREAS, Participating Members have agreed to renew the same contract with the
current Vendor, at the same funding levels from each organization. 7
2
WHEREAS, Participating Members do hereby collectively determine and declare that this
Intergovernmental Agreement is necessary, proper and convenient for the continued
fostering and preservation of the public health, safety and wellbeing.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements of the
parties and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Effect of IGA. Except as expressly provided herein, this IGA shall replace and
supersede all prior agreements of any kind between all or any of the Participating
Members and any or all other Participating members hereto, to the extent and for the
limited purpose as such other agreements may be related to the provision of funding
collaborative and integrated mental health and substance abuse prevention,
intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case management programs.
2. Fiscal Agent. Pitkin County agrees to be the fiscal agent providing payment to
Mind Springs Health (and Mountain Family Health Centers) in the amount of
$556,332 in 2020 for collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use
prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment, and case management
programs per the contract and approved in the County's 2020 budget (See Exhibit A
- Mental Health Services 2020 Scope of Work and Exhibit B - Change Order). Once
invoiced by Pitkin County in Quarter one, Participating Members agree to pay in
full.
3. Funding Allocation. The Participating Members agree to provide funding in return
for collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use prevention,
intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case management programs as
follows. By October each year Mind Springs Health (and Mountain Family Health
Centers) will provide the County with a budget to fund collaborative and integrated
mental health and substance use prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization,
treatment, and case management programs for the next fiscal year. The share for
each entity will be determined as follows:
a. In-Kind Contributions:
i. Pursuant to an annual lease agreement with Mind Springs Health,
Pitkin County shall provide, at no cost, space in the Schultz Health
and Human Services Building to Mind Springs Health for
collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use
prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case
management programs. The value of this space is recognized as
$59,766 per year.
ii. Aspen School District shall provide, at no cost, space in the
Aspen Middle School for Mind Springs Health a youth and family
clinician. The value of this space is recognized as $45,000 per year.
b. Cash Funding:8
3
i. Aspen Valley Hospital agrees to pay $73,275 of the provision of
collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use
prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case
management programs provided by the Vendor.
ii. Aspen School District agrees to pay $40,000 for the provision of
a school based youth and family clinician provided by the Vendor.
iii. City of Aspen agrees to pay $107,550 for the provision of
collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use,
prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case
management programs provided by the Vendor.
iv. Pitkin County agrees to pay $335,507 for the provision of
collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use
prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case
management programs provided by the Vendor.
4. Quality Assurance. Participating Members are committed to working together to ensure
that relevant performance measures are utilized for the purpose of on-going evaluation of
services in accordance with the developed 2019 Key Performance Indicators.
a. Pitkin County Public Health will be responsible for contract compliance
with the Vendor.
b. The Steering Committee agrees to meet quarterly to review performance
measures, financial expenditure and budget compliance.
c. Participating Members agree to assign staff to participate in formal
quarterly operational groups (protocols, issues, needs, communication,
debriefs, etc) with the Vendor.
d. Participating Members agree to commit staff to participate in rapid case
debrief outside of the quarterly operations groups.
e. Participating Members agree to support by gathering key performance
indicators necessary from the perspective of each member's operations.
5. Term and Extensions. This Agreement shall commence upon the date first written above,
and shall continue through the 30th day of December 2020. This Agreement may be
extended for successive one-year terms upon mutual written agreement of the parties 10
days prior to the expiration date.
6. Assignability. This agreement is not assignable by either party.
7. Modification. This Agreement may be changed or modified only in writing, by an
agreement approved by the respective Boards of the Governments and signed by authorized
officers of each party.
8. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties
and all other promises and agreements relating to the subject of this Agreement, whether
oral or written, are merged herein.
9. Severability. Should any one or more sections or provisions of this Agreement be
judicially adjudged invalid or unenforceable, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or
9
4
invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement, the intention being that the various
sections and provisions hereof are severable.
10. Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. Any Party has the right to terminate or
withdraw from this Agreement, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the other
Parties of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. Such notice shall be
given at least ten (10) days before the effective date of such termination. Termination of the
Agreement relieves the cancelling or withdrawing Party of any further responsibility under
this Agreement except for specifically identified obligations of a continuing nature based
upon past performance under the Agreement.
11. Notice. Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and
shall be provided by electronic delivery to the e-mail addresses set forth below and by one of
the following methods 1) hand-delivery or 2) registered or certified mail, postage pre-paid to
the mailing addresses set forth below. Each party by notice sent under this paragraph may
change the address to which future notices should be sent. Electronic delivery of notices shall
be considered delivered upon receipt of confirmation of delivery on the part of the sender.
Nothing contained herein shall be construed to preclude personal service of any notice in the
manner prescribed for personal service of a summons or other legal process.
To: Pitkin County With copies to:
Jon Peacock, County Manager Pitkin County Attorney’s Office
530 East Main Street, Ste. 302 530 East Main Street, Ste. 301
Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611
Jon.peacock@pitkincounty.com attorney@pitkincounty.com
To: Aspen Valley Hospital With copies to:
Dave Ressler, Chief Executive Officer Aspen Valley Hospital Attorney
0401 Castle Creek Road 0401 Castle Creek Road
Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611
970-544-1261 970-925-1142
To: City of Aspen With copies to:
Sara Ott, City Manager City of Aspen Attorney
130 South Galena Street 130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611
970-920-5212 970-920-5212
To: Aspen School District With copies to:
Tom Heald, Interim Superintendent Aspen School District Attorney
235 High School Road 235 High School Road
Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611
970-925-3760 970-925-3760
7. Government Immunity. The parties agree and understand that both parties are
relying on and do not waive, by any provisions of this Agreement, the monetary
limitations or terms or any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the
Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. 24-10-101, et seq., as from time to
time amended or otherwise available to the parties or any of their officers, agents, or
employees. 10
5
8. Current Year Obligations. The parties acknowledge and agree that any payments
provided for hereunder or requirements for future appropriations shall constitute
only currently budgeted expenditures of the parties. The parties’ obligations under
this Agreement are subject to each individual party’s annual right to budget and
appropriate the sums necessary to provide the services set forth herein. No
provision of this Agreement shall be construed or interpreted as creating a multiple
fiscal year direct or indirect debt or other financial obligation of either or both
parties within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation. This
Agreement shall not be construed to pledge or create a lien on any class or source of
either parties’ bonds or any obligations payable from any class or source of each
individual party’s money.
9. Binding Rights and Obligations. The rights and obligations of the parties under this
Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and
their respective successors and assigns.
10. Agreement made in Colorado. This Agreement shall be construed according to the
laws of the State of Colorado, and venue for any action shall be in the District Court
in and for Pitkin County, Colorado.
11. Attorney Fees. In the event that legal action is necessary to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, the substantially prevailing party, whether by final
judgment or out of court settlement, shall recover from the other party all costs and
expenses of such action or suit including reasonable attorney fees.
12. No Waiver. The waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term or condition of
this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach
by any party.
13. Authority. Each person signing this Agreement represents and warrants that said
person is fully authorized to enter into and execute this Agreement and to bind the
party it represents to the terms and conditions hereof.
11
6
The foregoing Agreement was approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin
County, Colorado at its regular meeting held on the _____ day of, 2020.
The foregoing Agreement was approved by Aspen Valley Hospital at its regular meeting
held on the _____ day of, 2020.
The foregoing Agreement was approved by the Aspen School District at its regular meeting
held on the _____ day of, 2020.
The foregoing Agreement was approved by the City of Aspen at its regular meeting held on
the _____ day of, 2020.
In Witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed as of the
day and year first above written.
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL
By:_________________________
[Title]
ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
By:_________________________
[Title]
CITY OF ASPEN
By:_________________________
[Title]
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVED AS TO FORM
OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
By: ________________________ __________________________
Steven F. Child, Chair John Ely, County Attorney
Manager Approval:
By:______________________
Jon Peacock, County Manager
12
1
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM: Raquel Flinker, Project Manager
Steve Hunter, Utilities Resource Manager
THROUGH:Tyler Christoff, Director of Utilities
MEMO DATE:05/04/2020
MEETING DATE:05/12/2020
RE:Aspen Water Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) – Phase 1 Update and Phase
2 Contract for Professional Services (Resolution #36, Series of 2020)
REQUEST OF COUNCIL: Staff seeks to update Council on the completion of Phase 1 of the IRP.
Staff also seeks Council’s approval of the Aspen Water Integrated Resource Plan Phase 2
contract for professional services with Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo) in the amount of
$220,896.00.
SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND: The City operates an Integrated Water Supply System (IWSS) to
ensure a safe, legal and reliable water system for our community, now and into the future. This
IWSS includes various water rights, infrastructure, and demand management techniques that
work together to meet the City’s goals. The City is undertaking an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)
process to update the City’s long-term water supply goals, review the City’s water supply
portfolio, and determine the best management techniques for long-range planning. This large
effort is being accomplished intwo phases. Phase 1, the planning phase, was recently completed
and involved meetings with staff, various stakeholders, and City leaders to determine the
appropriate methods and goals for the IRP. Phase 2 will include the implementation of the Scope
of Work (SOW) developed in Phase 1.
DISCUSSION:Phase 1 of the IRP began in November 2019 and its activities focused on
developing water planning goals and opportunities specific to Aspen’s water supplies as well
as identifying information gaps. Phase 1 crafted strategies for engaging stakeholders during
Phase 2. Phase 1 of the IRP recently concluded with the development of a detailed workplan
to help guide Phase 2. A summary of Phase 1 is included in Exhibit A.
Building off the goals and outcomes developed in Phase 1, staff and the consultant team intend
to develop a long-term vision for the City’s integrated water supply system in Phase 2.
Anticipated outcomes of Phase 2 are:
13
1. Roadmap for the City’s water strategy to provide long‐term water supply resiliency and
reliability,
2. Clear path forward for implementing the City’s conditional storage rights,
3. Water supply capital program, and
4. Community outreach and Council consideration of the IRP recommendations.
Carollo has been the consultant for Phase I of this project. They were selected through the
competitive RFP process in the fall of 2019. Five proposals were received and the top three
teams went through extensive interviews with the selection committee. Carollo has
demonstrated a thorough understanding of our system and needs. To date Carollo’s
deliverables have been of professional quality and exceeded all staff expectations. The team
holds specific knowledge regarding the City’s water portfolio, complex water system and they
are an industry leader in the development of Integrated Resource Plans. Staff recommends
that it is in the City’s best interests to award Phase II of the Integrated Resource Plan to
Carollo.
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Staff intends to use 2020 Utilities funding for this Project.
Total Project Expenditures
Carollo Professional Services Contract $220,896.00
Total $220,896.00
Funding Budgeted
Aspen IRP – Phase 2 (acct #421.322.81200.50942)$211,887.95
Pre-Project Engineering Services (acct #421.322.81200.50930)$ 9,008.05
Total $220,896.00
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: By more efficiently managing its Integrated Water Supply System,
the City will also increase its efficiency in energy management and continue its dedication to
environmental stewardship of the watersheds we depend on for sustaining our community.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends that Council approve the Aspen Water Integrated
Resource Plan Phase 2 contract for professional services with Carollo in the amount of
$220,896.00.
PROPOSED MOTION: “I move to approve Resolution No. 036, Series of 2020.”
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
14
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A – Project memo IRP Phase 1 summary
Exhibit B – Resolution #36, Series of 2020
Exhibit C – Carollo Professional Services Contract for Phase 2 of the IRP
15
pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CO/Aspen/11690A00/Deliverables/Project memo IRP Phase 1 summary_041420.docx PAGE 1 of 2
PROJECT MEMORANDUM
INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN
City of Aspen
Prepared By: John Rehring, P.E.
Reviewed by: Inge Wiersema, P.E.
Subject: Synopsis of Integrated Resource Plan Phase & Activities and Findings
Overview of IRP Development
The City of Aspen (City) is developing an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), which will provide a roadmap for the
City’s long‐term water strategy. The City seeks to develop an IRP to analyze its water rights portfolio and
develop a robust plan to provide a safe, legal and reliable water supply to its customers through at least 1234,
while respecting the City’s commitment to environmental stewardship.
Phase & of IRP development recently concluded with the development of a detailed workplan for IRP development
in Phase 1. Through a competitive process, the City engaged the consulting team of Carollo Engineers, Element
Water Consulting, and Ross Strategic to support the City’s IRP development efforts.
IRP Phase & activities focused on developing water planning goals and opportunities specific to Aspen’s water
supplies and identifying information gaps. The Phase & work also crafted strategies for engaging a wide range of
stakeholders in developing the IRP, including community members and City departments. In‐depth interviews and
discussions conducted in late 12&5 provided a foundation for the IRP, including:
· A series of in‐person meetings and interviews with staff from numerous City departments,
· Focused dialogue with Community Relations staff to develop engagement strategies, and
· Input from City leaders and City Council.
These interactions provided insights into previous plans and studies that have guided the City’s water supply
strategies to date, supply threats and opportunities, planning tactics and milestones, and priorities for guiding the
City’s water supply strategies. They also set a foundation for planning by obtaining input on existing studies and
information relevant for IRP development.
As part of Phase & efforts, input was gathered and documented for the following planning areas:
&. Planning Logistics, Practices, and Coordination with Other Initiatives
1. Environmental and Recreational Considerations
8. Demand Forecasts
9. Characterization and Mitigation of Threats to Supply
4. Raw Water Storage
3. Treated Water Transmission, Distribution, and Storage
;. Source Water and Transmission System: Miscellaneous Projects and Operational Considerations
=. Engagement Considerations
Date: April &9, 1212
Project No.: &&352A.22
16
PROJECT MEMORANDUM
PAGE 1 of 1
Drivers and Goals for IRP Planning
Elements of the City’s drivers, vision, and goals for the IRP were evidenced in the input provided through the course
of these discussions. The City has many drivers for developing the IRP. Examples of drivers that were illuminated
via the staff workshops include:
· Clear direction on raw water storage (size, siting and implementation) for Castle Creek and Maroon Creek
conditional storage rights.
· Enhanced plans for optimized use of the City’s various water rights.
· Need for increased community awareness regarding water reliability and scarcity.
· Community and City interest in securing a sustainable, reliable water supply for decades to come, in the face of
threats such as extended drought and climate change.
· Leveraging relevant elements of previous studies regarding water supply challenges and opportunities.
Elements of the City’s vision and goals for the IRP include the following:
· Comprehensive assessment of future demands, existing supply capabilities, future supply opportunities.
· Identification and mitigation of water supply threats for a resilient, reliable supply system.
· Assessment of future raw water storage siting and assessment of the infrastructure and operational
implications of storing water lower in the system.
· Use of a transparent, inclusive process and clear documentation of the analyses, rationale for decision‐making,
and results.
· Engagement of key stakeholders and community members, including a “consultative” approach to interacting
with key stakeholders.
· Integration of water planning via the IRP with other key City planning efforts, such as conservation and
efficient landscaping programs, Parks initiatives, Community Development planning processes, the Climate
Action Plan, and the River Management Plan.
Potential future sources of water supply were identified for assessment in Phase 1. The planning team will consider
the reliability, water quality, and treatability of each water supply source, as well as the ability to utilize each source
in emergencies (e.g., avalanches, wildfires).
IRP Outcomes
Anticipated key outcomes of Phase 1 of the IRP in 121& include:
· Roadmap for the City’s water strategy to provide long‐term water supply resiliency and reliability,
· Clear path forward for implementing the City’s conditional storage rights,
· Water supply capital program, and
· Community support and Council consideration of the IRP recommendations.
The IRP will be developed in Phase 1 through execution of the following tasks:
Stakeholder Engagement Basis of Planning Demand Forecast
Characterize Existing Water Supply
System and Forecast Future Supply
Future Supply Strategy Documentation
Development of the IRP is expected to culminate in documentation and City Council consideration of the plan in
late spring 121&. 17
RESOLUTION #036
(Series of 2020)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO, WHICH AUTHORIZES THE CITY OF ASPEN TO ENTER INTO
A PROFESSIONAL AGREEMENT WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR
CONSULTANT ASSISTANCE WITH ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT’S
INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN (IRP) PHASE 2.
WHEREAS, the City operates an Integrated Water Supply System (IWSS)
that uses various water rights, infrastructure and management techniques to best
serve its customers; and
WHEREAS, the City released a Request for Proposals for consultant
assistance with developing an Integrated Resource Plan to provide long-range
planning for the City’s IWSS; and
WHEREAS, the Carollo Engineers Team was determined by the selection
committee to provide the most comprehensive professional services for this project;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby authorizes the professional
agreement to Carollo Engineers in the amount of $220,896.00, and authorizes the
City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Aspen on the 12th day of May, 2020.
Torre, Mayor
I, Nicole Henning, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the
foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that Resolution adopted by the City
Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held May 12, 2020.
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
18
Agreement Professional Services Page 1
CITY OF ASPEN STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT V 2009
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
City of Aspen Contract No.: 2020-59042
AGREEMENT made as of 12 day of May, in the year 2020.
BETWEEN the City:
Contract Amount:
The City of Aspen
c/o Sara Ott
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone: (970) 920-5079
And the Professional:
Carollo Engineers
c/o John Rehring
390 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 800
Broomfield, CO 80021
Phone: (303) 635-1220
For the Following Project:
City of Aspen Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Strategic Consulting Services – Phase 2
Exhibits appended and made a part of this Agreement:
The City and Professional agree as set forth below.
If this Agreement requires the City to pay
an amount of money in excess of
$50,000.00 it shall not be deemed valid
until it has been approved by the City
Council of the City of Aspen.
City Council Approval:
Date: ___________________________
Resolution No.:___________________
Exhibit A: Scope of Work.
Exhibit B: Fee Schedule.
Exhibit C: Schedule.
Total: $220,896.00
19
Agreement Professional Services Page 2
1. Scope of Work. Professional shall perform in a competent and professional manner the
Scope of Work as set forth at Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
2. Completion. Professional shall commence Work immediately upon receipt of a written
Notice to Proceed from the City and complete all phases of the Scope of Work as expeditiously as
is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work in a timely
manner. The parties anticipate that all Work pursuant to this Agreement shall be completed no later
than June 1, 2021. Upon request of the City, Professional shall submit, for the City's approval, a
schedule for the performance of Professional's services which shall be adjusted as required as the
project proceeds, and which shall include allowances for periods of time required by the City's
project engineer for review and approval of submissions and for approvals of authorities having
jurisdiction over the project. This schedule, when approved by the City, shall not, except for
reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Professional.
3. Payment. In consideration of the work performed, City shall pay Professional on a time and
expense basis for all work performed. The hourly rates for work performed by Professional shall
not exceed those hourly rates set forth at Exhibit B appended hereto. Except as otherwise mutually
agreed to by the parties the payments made to Professional shall not initially exceed the amount set
forth above. Professional shall submit, in timely fashion, invoices for work performed. The City
shall review such invoices and, if they are considered incorrect or untimely, the City shall review
the matter with Professional within ten days from receipt of the Professional's bill.
4. Non-Assignability. Both parties recognize that this Agreement is one for personal services
and cannot be transferred, assigned, or sublet by either party without prior written consent of the
other. Sub-Contracting, if authorized, shall not relieve the Professional of any of the responsibilities
or obligations under this Agreement. Professional shall be and remain solely responsible to the City
for the acts, errors, omissions or neglect of any subcontractors’ officers, agents and employees, each
of whom shall, for this purpose be deemed to be an agent or employee of the Professional to the
extent of the subcontract. The City shall not be obligated to pay or be liable for payment of any
sums due which may be due to any sub-contractor.
5. Termination of Procurement. The sale contemplated by this Agreement may be
canceled by the City prior to acceptance by the City whenever for any reason and in its sole
discretion the City shall determine that such cancellation is in its best interests and convenience.
6. Termination of Professional Services. The Professional or the City may terminate the
Professional Services component of this Agreement, without specifying the reason therefor, by
giving notice, in writing, addressed to the other party, specifying the effective date of the
termination. No fees shall be earned after the effective date of the termination. Upon any
termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models,
photographs, reports or other material prepared by the Professional pursuant to this Agreement
shall become the property of the City. Notwithstanding the above, Professional shall not be
relieved of any liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of
this Agreement by the Professional, and the City may withhold any payments to the Professional
for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from the
Professional may be determined.
20
Agreement Professional Services Page 3
7. Independent Contractor Status. It is expressly acknowledged and understood by the parties
that nothing contained in this agreement shall result in, or be construed as establishing an
employment relationship. Professional shall be, and shall perform as, an independent Contractor
who agrees to use his or her best efforts to provide the said services on behalf of the City. No
agent, employee, or servant of Professional shall be, or shall be deemed to be, the employee, agent
or servant of the City. City is interested only in the results obtained under this contract. The
manner and means of conducting the work are under the sole control of Professional. None of the
benefits provided by City to its employees including, but not limited to, workers' compensation
insurance and unemployment insurance, are available from City to the employees, agents or
servants of Professional. Professional shall be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the
acts of Professional's agents, employees, servants and subcontractors during the performance of this
contract. Professional shall indemnify City against all liability and loss in connection with, and
shall assume full responsibility for payment of all federal, state and local taxes or contributions
imposed or required under unemployment insurance, social security and income tax law, with
respect to Professional and/or Professional's employees engaged in the performance of the services
agreed to herein.
8. Indemnification. Professional agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers,
employees, insurers, and self-insurance pool, from and against all liability, claims, and demands, on
account of injury, loss, or damage, including without limitation claims arising from bodily injury,
personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage, or any other loss of any kind
whatsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with this contract, to the extent and
for an amount represented by the degree or percentage such injury, loss, or damage is caused in
whole or in part by, or is claimed to be caused in whole or in part by, the wrongful act, omission,
error, professional error, mistake, negligence, or other fault of the Professional, any subcontractor of
the Professional, or any officer, employee, representative, or agent of the Professional or of any
subcontractor of the Professional, or which arises out of any workmen's compensation claim of any
employee of the Professional or of any employee of any subcontractor of the Professional. The
Professional agrees to investigate, handle, respond to, and to provide defense for and defend
against, any such liability, claims or demands at the sole expense of the Professional, or at the
option of the City, agrees to pay the City or reimburse the City for the defense costs incurred by the
City in connection with, any such liability, claims, or demands. If it is determined by the final
judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction that such injury, loss, or damage was caused in whole
or in part by the act, omission, or other fault of the City, its officers, or its employees, the City shall
reimburse the Professional for the portion of the judgment attributable to such act, omission, or
other fault of the City, its officers, or employees.
9. Professional's Insurance.
(a) Professional agrees to procure and maintain, at its own expense, a policy or policies
of insurance sufficient to insure against all liability, claims, demands, and other obligations
assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. Such insurance shall be in
addition to any other insurance requirements imposed by this contract or by law. The
Professional shall not be relieved of any liability, claims, demands, or other obligations
assumed pursuant to Section 8 above by reason of its failure to procure or maintain
insurance, or by reason of its failure to procure or maintain insurance in sufficient amounts,
duration, or types. 21
Agreement Professional Services Page 4
(b) Professional shall procure and maintain, and shall cause any subcontractor of the
Professional to procure and maintain, the minimum insurance coverages listed below. Such
coverages shall be procured and maintained with forms and insurance acceptable to the
City. All coverages shall be continuously maintained to cover all liability, claims, demands,
and other obligations assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. In the case
of any claims-made policy, the necessary retroactive dates and extended reporting periods
shall be procured to maintain such continuous coverage.
(i) Workers’ Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by
applicable laws for any employee engaged in the performance of work under this
contract, and Employers' Liability insurance with minimum limits of ONE
MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) for each accident, ONE MILLION
DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) disease - policy limit, and ONE MILLION DOLLARS
($1,000,000.00) disease - each employee. Evidence of qualified self-insured status
may be substituted for the Workers' Compensation requirements of this paragraph.
(ii) Commercial General Liability insurance with minimum combined single
limits of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and ONE
MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) aggregate. The policy shall be applicable to
all premises and operations. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury,
broad form property damage (including completed operations), personal injury
(including coverage for contractual and employee acts), blanket contractual,
independent contractors, products, and completed operations. The policy shall
contain a severability of interests provision.
(iii) Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance with minimum combined
single limits for bodily injury and property damage of not less than ONE MILLION
DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and ONE MILLION DOLLARS
($1,000,000.00) aggregate with respect to each Professional's owned, hired and non-
owned vehicles assigned to or used in performance of the Scope of Work. The
policy shall contain a severability of interests provision. If the Professional has no
owned automobiles, the requirements of this Section shall be met by each employee
of the Professional providing services to the City under this contract.
(iv) Professional Liability insurance with the minimum limits of ONE
MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) each claim and ONE MILLION DOLLARS
($1,000,000) aggregate.
(c) Except Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability, the policy or policies
required above shall be endorsed to include the City and the City's officers and employees
as additional insureds. Every policy required above shall be primary insurance, and any
insurance carried by the City, its officers or employees, or carried by or provided through
any insurance pool of the City, shall be excess and not contributory insurance to that
provided by Professional. No additional insured endorsement to the policy required above
shall contain any exclusion for bodily injury or property damage arising from completed
operations. The Professional shall be solely responsible for any deductible losses under any
policy required above. 22
Agreement Professional Services Page 5
(d) The certificate of insurance provided to the City shall be completed by the
Professional's insurance agent as evidence that policies providing the required coverages,
conditions, and minimum limits are in full force and effect, and shall be reviewed and
approved by the City prior to commencement of the contract. No other form of certificate
shall be used. The certificate shall identify this contract and shall provide that the coverages
afforded under the policies shall not be canceled, terminated or reduced in coverage until at
least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City.
(e) Failure on the part of the Professional to procure or maintain policies providing the
required coverages, conditions, and minimum limits shall constitute a material breach of
contract upon which City may immediately terminate this contract, or at its discretion City
may procure or renew any such policy or any extended reporting period thereto and may pay
any and all premiums in connection therewith, and all monies so paid by City shall be
repaid by Professional to City upon demand, or City may offset the cost of the premiums
against monies due to Professional from City.
(f) City reserves the right to request and receive a certified copy of any policy and any
endorsement thereto.
(g) The parties hereto understand and agree that City is relying on, and does not waive or
intend to waive by any provision of this contract, the monetary limitations (presently
$350,000.00 per person and $990,000 per occurrence) or any other rights, immunities, and
protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, Section 24-10-101 et
seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or otherwise available to City, its officers, or its
employees.
10. City's Insurance. The parties hereto understand that the City is a member of the Colorado
Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) and as such participates in the CIRSA Proper-
ty/Casualty Pool. Copies of the CIRSA policies and manual are kept at the City of Aspen Risk
Management Department and are available to Professional for inspection during normal business
hours. City makes no representations whatsoever with respect to specific coverages offered by
CIRSA. City shall provide Professional reasonable notice of any changes in its membership or
participation in CIRSA.
11. Completeness of Agreement. It is expressly agreed that this agreement contains the entire
undertaking of the parties relevant to the subject matter thereof and there are no verbal or written
representations, agreements, warranties or promises pertaining to the project matter thereof not
expressly incorporated in this writing.
12. Notice. Any written notices as called for herein may be hand delivered or mailed by
certified mail return receipt requested to the respective persons and/or addresses listed above.
13. Non-Discrimination. No discrimination because of race, color, creed, sex, marital status,
affectional or sexual orientation, family responsibility, national origin, ancestry, handicap, or
religion shall be made in the employment of persons to perform services under this contract.
Professional agrees to meet all of the requirements of City's municipal code, Section 15.04.570,
pertaining to non-discrimination in employment. 23
Agreement Professional Services Page 6
14. Waiver. The waiver by the City of any term, covenant, or condition hereof shall not
operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term. No term, covenant, or
condition of this Agreement can be waived except by the written consent of the City, and
forbearance or indulgence by the City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of any
term, covenant, or condition to be performed by Professional to which the same may apply and,
until complete performance by Professional of said term, covenant or condition, the City shall be
entitled to invoke any remedy available to it under this Agreement or by law despite any such
forbearance or indulgence.
15. Execution of Agreement by City. This Agreement shall be binding upon all parties hereto
and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained herein, this Agreement shall not be binding upon the City unless
duly executed by the Mayor of the City of Aspen (or a duly authorized official in his absence)
following a Motion or Resolution of the Council of the City of Aspen authorizing the Mayor (or a
duly authorized official in his absence) to execute the same.
16. Illegal Aliens – CRS 8-17.5-101 & 24-76.5-101.
(a) Purpose. During the 2006 Colorado legislative session, the Legislature passed
House Bills 06-1343 (subsequently amended by HB 07-1073) and 06-1023 that added
new statutes relating to the employment of and contracting with illegal aliens. These new
laws prohibit all state agencies and political subdivisions, including the City of Aspen,
from knowingly hiring an illegal alien to perform work under a contract, or to knowingly
contract with a subcontractor who knowingly hires with an illegal alien to perform work
under the contract. The new laws also require that all contracts for services include
certain specific language as set forth in the statutes. The following terms and conditions
have been designed to comply with the requirements of this new law.
(b) Definitions. The following terms are defined in the new law and by this reference
are incorporated herein and in any contract for services entered into with the City of
Aspen.
“Basic Pilot Program” means the basic pilot employment verification program
created in Public Law 208, 104th Congress, as amended, and expanded in Public
Law 156, 108th Congress, as amended, that is administered by the United States
Department of Homeland Security.
“Public Contract for Services” means this Agreement.
“Services” means the furnishing of labor, time, or effort by a Contractor or a
subcontractor not involving the delivery of a specific end product other than
reports that are merely incidental to the required performance.
(c) By signing this document, Professional certifies and represents that at this time:
(i) Professional shall confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are
newly hired for employment in the United States; and 24
Agreement Professional Services Page 7
(ii) Professional has participated or attempted to participate in the Basic Pilot
Program in order to verify that new employees are not illegal aliens.
(d) Professional hereby confirms that:
(i) Professional shall not knowingly employ or contract new employees
without confirming the employment eligibility of all such employees hired for
employment in the United States under the Public Contract for Services.
(ii) Professional shall not enter into a contract with a subcontractor that fails to
confirm to the Professional that the subcontractor shall not knowingly hire new
employees without confirming their employment eligibility for employment in the
United States under the Public Contract for Services.
(iii) Professional has verified or has attempted to verify through participation
in the Federal Basic Pilot Program that Professional does not employ any new
employees who are not eligible for employment in the United States; and if
Professional has not been accepted into the Federal Basic Pilot Program prior to
entering into the Public Contract for Services, Professional shall forthwith apply
to participate in the Federal Basic Pilot Program and shall in writing verify such
application within five (5) days of the date of the Public Contract. Professional
shall continue to apply to participate in the Federal Basic Pilot Program and shall
in writing verify same every three (3) calendar months thereafter, until
Professional is accepted or the public contract for services has been completed,
whichever is earlier. The requirements of this section shall not be required or
effective if the Federal Basic Pilot Program is discontinued.
(iv) Professional shall not use the Basic Pilot Program procedures to undertake
pre-employment screening of job applicants while the Public Contract for
Services is being performed.
(v) If Professional obtains actual knowledge that a subcontractor performing
work under the Public Contract for Services knowingly employs or contracts with
a new employee who is an illegal alien, Professional shall:
(1) Notify such subcontractor and the City of Aspen within three days
that Professional has actual knowledge that the subcontractor has newly
employed or contracted with an illegal alien; and
(2) Terminate the subcontract with the subcontractor if within three
days of receiving the notice required pursuant to this section the
subcontractor does not cease employing or contracting with the new
employee who is an illegal alien; except that Professional shall not
terminate the Public Contract for Services with the subcontractor if during
such three days the subcontractor provides information to establish that the
subcontractor has not knowingly employed or contracted with an illegal
alien. 25
Agreement Professional Services Page 8
(vi) Professional shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado
Department of Labor and Employment made in the course of an investigation that
the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment undertakes or is undertaking
pursuant to the authority established in Subsection 8-17.5-102 (5), C.R.S.
(vii) If Professional violates any provision of the Public Contract for Services
pertaining to the duties imposed by Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. the City of
Aspen may terminate the Public Contract for Services. If the Public Contract for
Services is so terminated, Contractor shall be liable for actual and consequential
damages to the City of Aspen arising out of Professional’s violation of Subsection
8-17.5-102, C.R.S.
(ix) If Professional operates as a sole proprietor, Professional hereby swears or
affirms under penalty of perjury that the Professional (1) is a citizen of the United
States or otherwise lawfully present in the United States pursuant to federal law,
(2) shall comply with the provisions of CRS 24-76.5-101 et seq., and (3) shall
produce one of the forms of identification required by CRS 24-76.5-103 prior to
the effective date of this Agreement.
17. Warranties Against Contingent Fees, Gratuities, Kickbacks and Conflicts of Interest.
(a) Professional warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or
retained to solicit or secure this Contract upon an agreement or understanding for a
commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or
bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the Professional for
the purpose of securing business.
(b) Professional agrees not to give any employee of the City a gratuity or any offer of
employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation,
preparation of any part of a program requirement or a purchase request, influencing the
content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering advice, investigation,
auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any proceeding or application, request for
ruling, determination, claim or controversy, or other particular matter, pertaining to this
Agreement, or to any solicitation or proposal therefore.
(c) Professional represents that no official, officer, employee or representative of the
City during the term of this Agreement has or one (1) year thereafter shall have any
interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof, except those that
may have been disclosed at the time City Council approved the execution of this
Agreement.
(d) In addition to other remedies it may have for breach of the prohibitions against
contingent fees, gratuities, kickbacks and conflict of interest, the City shall have the right
to:
1. Cancel this Purchase Agreement without any liability by the City;
26
Agreement Professional Services Page 9
2. Debar or suspend the offending parties from being a Professional, contractor or
subcontractor under City contracts;
3. Deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the value of
anything transferred or received by the Professional; and
4. Recover such value from the offending parties.
18. Fund Availability. Financial obligations of the City payable after the current fiscal year
are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated, budgeted and otherwise made
available. If this Agreement contemplates the City utilizing state or federal funds to meet its
obligations herein, this Agreement shall be contingent upon the availability of those funds for
payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
19. General Terms.
(a) It is agreed that neither this Agreement nor any of its terms, provisions, conditions,
representations or covenants can be modified, changed, terminated or amended, waived,
superseded or extended except by appropriate written instrument fully executed by the
parties.
(b) If any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or
unenforceable it shall not affect or impair the validity, legality or enforceability of any other
provision.
(c) The parties acknowledge and understand that there are no conditions or limitations
to this understanding except those as contained herein at the time of the execution hereof
and that after execution no alteration, change or modification shall be made except upon a
writing signed by the parties.
(d) This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado as from time
to time in effect. Venue is agreed to be exclusively in the courts of Pitkin County,
Colorado.
20. Electronic Signatures and Electronic Records This Agreement and any
amendments hereto may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, and all of which together shall constitute one agreement binding on the Parties,
notwithstanding the possible event that all Parties may not have signed the same counterpart.
Furthermore, each Party consents to the use of electronic signatures by either Party. The Scope
of Work, and any other documents requiring a signature hereunder, may be signed electronically
in the manner agreed to by the Parties. The Parties agree not to deny the legal effect or
enforceability of the Agreement solely because it is in electronic form or because an electronic
record was used in its formation. The Parties agree not to object to the admissibility of the
Agreement in the form of an electronic record, or a paper copy of an electronic documents, or a
paper copy of a document bearing an electronic signature, on the grounds that it is an electronic
record or electronic signature or that it is not in its original form or is not an original.
20. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement and all of the covenants hereof shall inure to
the benefit of and be binding upon the City and the Professional respectively and their agents, 27
Agreement Professional Services Page 10
representatives, employee, successors, assigns and legal representatives. Neither the City nor the
Professional shall have the right to assign, transfer or sublet its interest or obligations hereunder
without the written consent of the other party.
21. Third Parties. This Agreement does not and shall not be deemed or construed to confer
upon or grant to any third party or parties, except to parties to whom Professional or City may
assign this Agreement in accordance with the specific written permission, any right to claim
damages or to bring any suit, action or other proceeding against either the City or Professional
because of any breach hereof or because of any of the terms, covenants, agreements or conditions
herein contained.
22. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that legal action is necessary to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable
attorney’s fees.
23. Waiver of Presumption. This Agreement was negotiated and reviewed through the
mutual efforts of the parties hereto and the parties agree that no construction shall be made or
presumption shall arise for or against either party based on any alleged unequal status of the
parties in the negotiation, review or drafting of the Agreement.
24. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion.
Professional certifies, by acceptance of this Agreement, that neither it nor its principals is
presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily
excluded from participation in any transaction with a Federal or State department or agency. It
further certifies that prior to submitting its Bid that it did include this clause without modification
in all lower tier transactions, solicitations, proposals, contracts and subcontracts. In the event
that Professional or any lower tier participant was unable to certify to the statement, an
explanation was attached to the Bid and was determined by the City to be satisfactory to the City.
25. Integration and Modification. This written Agreement along with all Contract
Documents shall constitute the contract between the parties and supersedes or incorporates any
prior written and oral agreements of the parties. In addition, Professional understands that no
City official or employee, other than the Mayor and City Council acting as a body at a council
meeting, has authority to enter into an Agreement or to modify the terms of the Agreement on
behalf of the City. Any such Agreement or modification to this Agreement must be in writing
and be executed by the parties hereto.
26. Authorized Representative. The undersigned representative of Professional, as an
inducement to the City to execute this Agreement, represents that he/she is an authorized
representative of Professional for the purposes of executing this Agreement and that he/she has
full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement for the terms and conditions specified
herein.
28
Agreement Professional Services Page 11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly
authorized officials, this Agreement of which shall be deemed an original on the date first written
above.
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: PROFESSIONAL:
________________________________ ______________________________
[Signature] [Signature]
By: _____________________________ By: John Rehring / Vincent Hart
[Name] [Name]
Title: ____________________________ Title: Vice President / Executive Vice President
Date: ___________________ Date: 5/4/2020
Approved as to form:
_______________________________
City Attorney’s Office
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[Sigigigigigigigigigigigigigigigigigigignanananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananananatututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututututurererererere
29
Agreement Professional Services Page 12
EXHIBIT A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Scope of Work
The City of Aspen initiated work on its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) in 2019 with an initial
phase of work (Phase 1) focused on defining needs, goals, and strategies for development of
the IRP. The scope of work to be conducted to complete the IRP in 2020-2021 (Phase 2) is
detailed in this document, and will be completed via the major tasks indicated in the table
below.
Task Title
1 Project Coordination
2 Stakeholder Engagement
3 Basis of Planning
4 Demand Forecast
5 Characterize Existing Water Supply System and Forecast Future Supply
6 Future Supply Strategy
7 Documentation
Task 1 – Project Coordination
1.1 Project Management
x Project staffing, budget, and schedule management.
x Subconsultant coordination and management.
1.2 Monthly Reporting
x Develop and submit a monthly progress report to accompany monthly invoices,
summarizing project activity for the reporting month and identifying any scope, schedule,
or budget issues and proposed resolution.
1.3 Project Coordination Calls
x Conduct up to 8 monthly project coordination calls with City Project Management team
to coordinate project progress and track and address action items. In lieu of meeting
notes, the project action and decision item log will be updated as necessary after each
call.
1.4 Progress Meetings
x Conduct up to 3 progress meetings to gather data, discuss progress, resolve
outstanding issues, and solicit input at key project milestones (e.g., water demands,
supply portfolios, and supply evaluation results).
Assumptions:
x 12-month project duration
30
Agreement Professional Services Page 13
x Project coordination calls will be held via teleconference / web meeting; each meeting
will be up to one hour in duration.
x Project coordination calls (Task 1.3) will not take place in months with in-person
progress meetings (Task 1.4).
x Two of the three progress meetings will be conducted remotely, and one will be
conducted in Aspen.
Deliverables:
x Monthly Progress Reports (up to 12, one per month, delivered electronically).
Task 2 – Stakeholder Engagement
2.1 Getting Ready for Engagement
x Complete stakeholder landscape assessment (issues and actors) and power mapping
(influence and dependencies).
x Provide support to development of communications materials (e.g., Q&A flyer, How to
Get Involved, public service announcement).
x Conduct and prepare synthesis of community influencer interviews.
Assumptions:
x Community engagement consultant will work in close collaboration with City staff to
develop communications materials and stakeholder management methods.
x City staff will have direct responsibility for conducting communications activities and
administering stakeholder tracking and day-to-day responsiveness.
x Aspen communications staff will take the lead on creating project branding and look and
feel for project engagement materials.
x Community engagement consultant will conduct up to 15, 45-minute interviews with key
community influencers (identified by City staff) to understand key priorities, needs, and
interests related to the IRP. The community engagement consultant will utilize this
information in preparing materials for the Task 2.2 virtual meeting #1 and open house
webinar #1.
Deliverables:
x Draft and final stakeholder landscape assessment.
x Review and comment on City staff prepared communications materials.
x Draft and final synthesis of community influencer interviews.
2.2 Focused Engagement Virtual Meeting and General Public Open House Webinar
Task activities listed below cover a series of three engagements, two virtual meetings with
corresponding open house webinars, and a final, in person meeting. The format of third
meeting (virtual vs. in-person) will be confirmed later in the year.
31
Agreement Professional Services Page 14
Focused Engagement “Virtual Meetings” Open House Webinars
Audience: Focused engagement virtual
meetings will target water professionals and
other interested and impacted parties that
track and engage regularly on water-related
topics. The target attendance will be
between 20 and 30 individuals for each
workshop. Anticipated virtual meeting
duration is 90-120 minutes.
Audience: General public open house
webinars will be open to the general public
and advertised widely. The sessions will be
designed to accommodate a large
attendance. Anticipated duration is 60-90
minutes. A recording of the online open
house webinar will be posted to the online
open house platform to allow the community
to engage as their schedules allow.
Topic 1:
x Getting to know one another
x Provide background on:
x System basics
x Existing conditions
x Overview of the planning process
x Get Input on community priorities
Topic 2:
x Provide Overview:
x Scope of alternatives
x Evaluation methods
x Provide initial thinking on alternatives
Topic 3:
x Review evaluation results
x Selection of Preferred Alternative
Assumptions:
x City staff will have responsibility for obtaining the virtual meeting and open house
webinar platform, providing logistics support for the meetings, participant recruitment,
invitations, registration, and communications.
x Preparation, support, and follow up to the virtual meetings and open house webinars
will include:
o Preparation of agendas and engagement approach
o Support for materials development
o Attendance (virtual), facilitation, and documentation
o Preparation of draft and final synthesis summaries
x Preparation, support, and follow up to the in-person focused engagement workshop
and in-person open house will include:
o Preparation of agendas and engagement approach
o Support for materials development
32
Agreement Professional Services Page 15
o Provide support to staff to Aspen City Staff to facilitate and document
o Review draft and final synthesis summaries prepared by Aspen City Staff
x Technical content for the focused engagement virtual meeting will match technical
content for the accompanying open house webinar for each of the three topic areas.
Engagement and open house meetings will be held at concurrent project milestones
for Topic 1, Topic 2, and Topic 3.
x Remote meeting participation will include Ross Strategic staff for all Task 2.2
meetings and one Carollo staff for Topic 1 and Topic 2 engagement meetings. Topic
3 meetings will be conducted in person in Aspen, led by City staff. One Carollo staff
member will attend the Topic 3 meetings in person to answer questions regarding
water supply alternatives.
x Deliverables:
o Draft and final agendas for workshops and open houses.
o Review and comment on City staff prepared workshop and open house
materials.
o Draft and final summaries of perspectives shared by virtual meeting
participants and webinar participants.
2.3 Support to City of Aspen’s Online Open House (OOH)
x Provide support for initial development of materials
x Support preparation of content updates for online open house (assumes 2 updates)
Assumptions:
x The Online Open House will use the Aspen Community Voices Platform
x Community engagement consultant will work in close collaboration with City staff to
develop communication materials for webpage and OOH content.
x Materials for webpage will be based on content generated for Open House Webinar
x City of Aspen staff will lead developing and administering OOH.
x The OOH will leverage and make a direct tie into Aspen’s existing email list
management software.
x The OOH will host a recording of the open house webinars for public access
x New media content will be developed and provided by City staff.
Deliverables:
x Initial materials for placement on the OOH
x Material updates to OOH content
x Online Open House Webinar recording
33
Agreement Professional Services Page 16
Task 3 – Basis of Planning
3.1 Prepare Basis of Planning Memorandum
x Develop a study area description for the City’s existing service area, including
undeveloped portions, as well as potential additional extensions beyond City limits.
x Prepare a GIS map of the study area to supplement the narrative and annotations of
key water related features and landmarks
x Establish the planning horizon for the study and select interim planning years (e.g.,
years ending in 0 and/or 5) and select the format for summarizing data by calendar,
fiscal, or water year.
x Present the population forecast and assumed occupancy rates through the planning
horizon and for interim planning years, separating permanent and transient population
estimates.
x In collaboration with City staff, develop goals for supply reliability.
x Prepare planning Class 5 cost estimating assumptions and associated mark-ups.
Assumptions:
x City will provide pertinent information for the study area description, population
estimates, historical water use, and bid tabs in native electronic format (GIS, Excel, etc.)
x Planning will include an assessment of GIS platforms; deliverables will be provided in a
format compatible with standard City GIS platform.
x The Basis of Planning memorandum will be submitted as a chapter of the Draft IRP
report. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that this chapter will not exceed 10 pages.
Deliverables:
x The findings of this task will be submitted as a draft chapter of the IRP report (electronic
MS Word format).
Task 4 – Demand Forecast
4.1 Adapt Demand Forecast for Use in IRP
x Incorporate updated demand forecast prepared by the City in a separate 2020 project
effort.
x Assess and summarize the demand forecasts to be used for IRP development.
Assumptions:
x Demand forecasts will be developed outside this scope of work, including monthly
patterns, peaking factors, and potential climate change impacts on demands.
Deliverables:
x The findings of this task will be submitted as a draft chapter of the IRP report. For
budgeting purposes, it is assumed that this chapter will not exceed 10 pages.
Task 5 – Existing and Future Water Supplies
5.1 Characterize Existing Water Supply Sources
x Utilize the City’s raw water inventory to prepare a summary of the surface water, ground
water, and any other water supplies owned by the City and a general description of legal
34
Agreement Professional Services Page 17
terms and conditions (e.g. amount, timing, and location of use) on the City’s right to use
the supplies.
x Prepare a summary of how each of the City’s water supplies have historically (up to ten
years) been diverted and used within the City’s potable water and/or raw water systems;
used to enhance streamflow; reused through water rights accounting procedures;
exchanged or used to augment other uses; and for any other uses. Include all major
sources of surface water diverted from streams and ground water diverted from wells.
x Prepare a description of how the City may utilize its water supplies in new ways, such as
using storm water and wastewater return flows, irrigating with raw versus potable water,
etc. Document any known operational, water quality, or other factors.
x Utilize information and data from the City’s water rights inventory to summarize the
historical and future projected yield of the City’s water supplies. To the extent existing
yield estimates are readily available, quantify the amount, timing, and locations of water
supply yields. If information is not readily available, prepare a general description of the
water supply, the relative magnitude of associated yield, and the general location of the
supply so that it may be considered for the future water supply strategy.
5.2 Characterize Existing Water Supply Infrastructure
x Prepare a summary of the general locations and capacities, and typical operational
status of the City’s existing raw non-potable, treated water, stormwater, and reclaimed
water infrastructure. This will include river diversion structures, wells, raw water storage
and conveyance system, water treatment plant, treated water storage and distribution
system, and plans to use reclaimed water.
x Describe any existing major operational constraints within the City’s raw and potable
water systems.
x Prepare or update the existing water supply infrastructure map to show the geographic
extent of the City’s service area and key water facilities.
5.3 Future Supply Projection
x Utilize information and data from the City’s recent water shortage assessment to
summarize the future projection of the City’s supplies. If there are additional supplies
identified under Task 5.1 that were not included in the recent water shortage
assessment, prepare an estimated range or order of magnitude estimate of potential
future yields for use in the future water supply strategy evaluation.
x To the extent readily available from the existing studies, prepare a summary table to
document the estimated future supply capacities (annual total, monthly or seasonal, and
peak day estimate) of the amount of water available from existing and potential future
water supplies through the planning horizon and for interim planning years.
5.4 Prepare Water Supply Vulnerability Assessment
x Identify major vulnerabilities associated with potential climate change impacts, wildfires,
avalanches, aging infrastructure, geotechnical mining history, and other near and long-
35
Agreement Professional Services Page 18
term factors that could affect water quality and quality. Document the supply
vulnerabilities in a table.
5.5 Prepare Future Supply Gap Analysis
x Prepare future water supply gap analysis using projected future demand with projected
future supply of the City’s existing water supply sources under existing water supply
infrastructure.
Assumptions:
x Prior estimates of historical and projected water supply yields will be relied upon and
detailed water supply yield analyses will not be prepared for this study.
x The supporting input data and information as well as the results from the analytical
model prepared by Headwaters Corporation and documented in the report entitled
“Aspen’s Water Future: Estimating the Number and Severity of Possible Future Water
Shortages” will be made available in native digital format (MS Excel) and will provide the
basis for yield information in this study. A water rights inventory with yields will be
provided by the City in electronic and editable format to characterize each water supply
in terms of relative amount, timing, and location of supply and general legal terms and
conditions that control the use of each supply.
x The City will facilitate any necessary communication between the Carollo team and the
City’s water rights consultant and legal counsel. Detailed water rights investigations will
not be prepared for this study.
x The 1984 City of Aspen Raw Water Supply Update, Comprehensive Water
Management Plan will be relied upon where new information is not otherwise readily
available or provided by the City.
x The City does not own or operate the wastewater system. Details related to wastewater
collection and treatment will not be included in this study, aside from general information
needed to describe the potential to utilize the City’s wastewater return flows. The
potential for future use of the City’s wastewater return flows will focus on uses within the
vicinity of the existing pipe that the City has installed for this purpose.
Deliverables:
x The findings of this task will be submitted as a draft chapter of the IRP report. For
budgeting purposes, it is assumed that this chapter will not exceed 25 pages.
Task 6 – Future Supply Strategy
6.1 Describe Future Supply Options
x Prepare a summary of previously-studied future raw water storage options, including
potential sites, capacity requirements to buffer demand fluctuations under the scenarios
defined in the Basis of Planning memorandum. Describe major infrastructure
components that would need to be constructed along with capital cost estimates and
annual energy needs for conveyance to/from the potential sites.
36
Agreement Professional Services Page 19
x Estimate the amount of additional conservation that could be achieved on a seasonal
basis.
x Describe future options to modify the current use of raw water supplies, including the
estimated changes in annual yield, major infrastructure components, high level capital
cost estimates, and operational considerations. Describe the hydrologic variability and
resiliency of each option.
x Describe future options to implement a water reuse program, including non-potable
reuse, indirect potable reuse with groundwater recharge, and/or direct potable reuse.
Describe pros and cons of each option, including operational, institutional, and
regulatory considerations, as well as the hydrologic variability and resiliency
assessment.
x Describe potential other infrastructure solutions, as well as new local or regional water
supply sources. Describe pros and cons of each option, including operational,
institutional, and regulatory considerations, as well as the hydrologic variability and
resiliency assessment.
x Create a GIS map that depicts the locations of the future supply options, building on the
map of existing sources developed earlier in the project.
6.2 Future Supply Evaluation
x Develop up to about five (5) draft water supply evaluation criteria. These criteria are
anticipated to be a mix of both qualitative and quantitative metrics that can be utilized.
Refine and finalize the criteria with input from City staff.
x Define up to three (3) future water supply portfolios or strategies, along with a “do
nothing” alternative, also referred to as the “status quo” option (total of 4 portfolios).
Prepare high level descriptions for each portfolio and a summary table of the total
supply capacity of each portfolio.
x Compare the new water supply portfolios with the “status quo” using the water supply
evaluation criteria.
6.3 Preferred Supply Strategy
x Develop a preferred water supply portfolio based on the evaluation results and
discussions with City staff. Prepare a description of all portfolio components and a GIS
map that depicts the locations and elements of the recommended combination of long-
term supply strategies for the City.
x Prepare a water supply capital improvement program (CIP) with Class 5 planning cost
estimates and project phasing.
Assumptions:
x The water supply options and portfolio descriptions will be at a conceptual level.
x Cost estimates will only be prepared for major project components (e.g., anticipated to
exceed $1 million or similar threshold).
37
Agreement Professional Services Page 20
x Both quantitative and qualitative criteria will be used in the portfolio evaluation. The
qualitative criteria may include low/medium/high or be simplified scores ranging from 1-3
or 1-5. Project benefits will not be monetized.
Deliverables:
x The findings of this task will be submitted as a draft chapter of the IRP report. For
budgeting purposes, it is assumed that this chapter will not exceed 30 pages.
Task 7 – Documentation
7.1 Draft IRP Report
x Prepare a draft Executive Summary
x Prepare a draft Introduction Chapter and other information needed to augment the draft
chapters previously prepared in Tasks 2-6.
x Prepare lists of abbreviations, acronyms, and references.
x Compile supporting materials in appendices.
x Compilation, document processing, and production of Draft IRP report for City review.
7.2 Final IRP Report
x Prepare Final IRP report by incorporating City comments on the Draft IRP.
x Compilation, document processing, and production of the Final IRP report.
Assumptions:
x City staff will provide one consolidated set of comments using track changes in MS
Word for all report chapters. Comments on figures and other non-text report elements
will be submitted as PDF markups.
x At the City’s discretion, City staff will solicit, review, and consolidate comments from the
general public and stakeholders prior to submittal to Carollo (to avoid conflicting
comments) and provide guidance where needed.
x Individual report chapters will be submitted in native MS Word and PDF format only.
Deliverables:
x Draft IRP report (3 hard copies, and 1 electronic copy in MS Word and PDF format)
x Final IRP report (10 hard copies, and 1 electronic copy in MS Word and PDF format)
Project Assumptions
x Third Parties. The services to be performed by the Professional are intended solely for
the benefit of the City. No person or entity not a signatory to this Agreement shall be
entitled to rely on the Professional’s performance of its services hereunder, and no right
to assert a claim against the Professional by assignment of indemnity rights or otherwise
shall accrue to a third party as a result of this Agreement or the performance of the
Professional’s services hereunder.
x Standard of Care. The Professional shall complete the services required hereunder in
accordance with the prevailing engineering standard of care by exercising the skill and
ability ordinarily required of engineers performing the same or similar services, under
the same or similar circumstances, in the State of Colorado. 38
Agreement Professional Services Page 21
x City-Provided Information and Services. The City shall furnish the Professional available
studies, reports and other data pertinent to the Professional’s services; obtain or
authorize the Professional to obtain or provide additional reports and data as required;
furnish to the Professional services of others required for the performance of the
Professional’s services hereunder, and the Professional shall be entitled to use and rely
upon all such information and services provided by the City or others in performing the
Professional’s services under this Agreement.
x Estimates and Projections. The Professional has no control over the cost of labor,
materials, equipment or services furnished by others, over the incoming water quality
and/or quantity, or over the way the City’s plant and/or associated processes are
operated and/or maintained. Data projections and estimates are based on the
Professional’s opinion based on experience and judgment. The Professional cannot and
does not guarantee that actual costs and/or quantities realized will not vary from the
data projections and estimates prepared by the Professional and the Professional will
not be liable to and/or indemnify the City and/ or any third party related to any
inconsistencies between the Professional’s data projections and estimates and actual
costs and/or quantities realized by the City and/or any third party in the future.
39
Agreement Professional Services Page 22
EXHIBIT B PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Fee Schedule
40
Agreement Professional Services Page 23
EXHIBIT C PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Schedule
41
1
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020
At 5:00 p.m. Mayor Torre called the regular meeting to order with Councilmembers Richards, Mesirow,
Mullins and Hauenstein joining via video conference.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Jeffrey Stromberg – Mr. Stromberg said he is calling on behalf and in support of Lee Mulcahy. He said
council should review Lee’s hours as it relates to his work approval having to do with his property. Mr.
Mulcahy is currently in non-compliance and would like to pay the fines to be brought back to a state of
compliance. on compliance. If council were not to do a review of his hours, it would be him losing his
due process.
Lee Mulcahy – Mr. Mulcahy said his friend Tom Coggins is having difficulty getting through, so he read a
statement from Mr. Coggins asking how the situation got so out of control. He said that Mr. Mulcahy
has not been given credit for construction hours and is asking for compromise. APCHA had a retreat
recently and discussed obeying applicable laws.
Peter Grenney –Mr. Grenney asked when will there be a public discussion on how the 13 million dollar
budget shortfall will affect the new city building and remodel of the Armory building. He said the new
city project should be suspended now until the community can weigh in.
Mayor Torre said there will be a budget update work session coming soon.
COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS:
Councilwoman Mullins showed off her mask which she got from the city. Last night we did quite a bit to
help one of our largest business sectors. She has an idea which would benefit restaurants and people in
need of meals by doing a restaurant voucher program. Avon and Silt both have them currently. It might
be something to look into and benefit a lot of people in town.
Councilman Mesirow thanked Ann for her suggestion. He’s also thinking about how we invest in the
future that we want.
Councilwoman Richards thanked everyone watching. She thanked people who have been isolating and
thinking twice before leaving the house and using face coverings. She follows the national news and said
it is interesting to see the trouble that all states have had with obtaining accurate testing. She said they
are currently doing everything within our powers and abilities to help the city.
Councilman Hauenstein said he took a ride through town today and it was nice to hear a jackhammer
and see some activity in town. He thanked the engineering department for the 700-site safety plans they
processed to get things going again and emphasized how important it is for the contractors.
Mayor Torre said he wished everyone health and happiness during these times. The stay at home order
and social distancing still in place and these are important days. The city did put in a mask mandate and
it’s up to each of us to do our part. Thousands of masks have been ordered by the city and should be
here by the end of the week. He supported the mask ordinance because this community is still seeing
arrivals from out of town. A return to work is on the horizon and there are more social contacts going
on, but we don’t want to see a resurgence.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
42
2
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020
Sara Ott said that last Thursday she made a disbursement of 200,000 to Pitkin County as part of the
financial economic assistance that city council authorized. This was run through Aspen Community
Foundation and an anonymous donor matched us dollar for dollar on that. The budget update is
scheduled for May 4th this coming evening and have some updated revenue estimates to make everyone
aware of. She also wants to share that Jeff Woods, after 23 years of service, will be retiring on June 30
th.
He is known for some of the most iconic features of our parks amenities including Sky Mountain and the
John Denver Sanctuary designed. He personally helped design most of that. She will be making an
interim appointment but won’t fill that position for the rest of the year. She has hired an Assistant City
Manager, Diane Foster. She is most recently City Manager of Park City, Utah. Work ethic and technical
skills.
Councilman Hauenstein thanked Sara for burning the candle at both ends.
Mayor Torre thanked her for her hard work as well.
BOARD REPORTS:
Mayor Torre said ACRA met this morning in its first teleconference. A lot went on regarding the hospital,
airport, tourism recovery plan, etc. He said he will get council the notes on that very soon.
Councilwoman Mullins said RFTA is meeting tomorrow morning and the Board of Health on Thursday.
She said they saw an educational presentation about the state of our county today. She said they had a
CORE meeting a week or so ago discussing budget and next week she will have a RFTA report.
Councilman Mesirow said that last Friday, they held an APCHA retreat. It was a successful retreat. He
said they went through their mission statement, vision statement and values and plugged them into ten
areas of focus. We will have a plan which APCHA will review and will share with the council. We will
have 5 big picture priorities.
Councilwoman Richards dittoed what skippy said on the APCHA retreat and said there will be a zoom call
Friday with club 20.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
No items were pulled for review.
Councilwoman Richards motioned to adopt the consent calendar as presented, Councilwoman Mullins
seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0, motion carried.
NOTICE OF CALL UP: 227 E. Main Street
Amy Simon
Ms. Simon said it’s a 3000 square foot lot. There is a Victorian era miner’s cottage on the property and
will be converted to a single-family home. They will restore the house and expand it. HPC approved this
unanimously 7-0.
43
3
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020
Councilwoman Mullins asked if it’s a mixed-use property and Ms. Simon said yes. Councilwoman Mullins
asked if the house is remaining in its original location and Ms. Simon said yes. Councilwoman Mullins
said she doesn’t support calling this up.
Councilman Hauenstein said he did a site visit and it needs some tender loving care as it’s in bad shape.
He asked about the trees in the back being removed and Ms. Simon said yes, the parks department has
given permission for this. He’s comfortable with this and said he has no desire to call up.
Councilwoman Richards said she sees no need for call up.
Mayor Torre said he has a concern on Main Street with residential taking over commercial. He
wondered if there is an opportunity to talk about this and asked if community development is also
concerned. Ms. Simon said with the recent code amendments, council did discuss the uses and what is
most acceptable on Main Street. There are a lot of historic homes which line that street and the square
footage allowed for residential is much lower. There are a lot of upsides to the restoration.
Councilman Mesirow said he’s not interested in calling this up and we need to respect our boards and
commissions vote and is in the scope of what we allow. To him, however, this does not meet the best
outcomes for the community.
Councilwoman Richards said she’d be happy to look at the zoning on Main Street for better outcomes.
Councilwoman Mullins said its city council’s fault because we’ve been scared to death to touch
residential guidelines. It’s not HPC’s fault. This is something that this council should look at in the future,
not now obviously. We do need to approach it at some point.
Phillip Supino said community development is happy to have this conversation moving forward and are
prepared to come to a work session to facilitate this.
Councilman Mesirow said he puts the blame with the decision makers of the past. He’s ready for this
conversation.
Mayor Torre told Ms. Simon there will be no call up on this item.
PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance #03, Series of 2020 – Second Reading of Wireless Communication Facilities
Design
Ben Anderson
Mr. Anderson said they postponed this from March 24
th and said the city has spent extensive amount of
time on this. public outreach campaign. HR Green, an engineering consultant group, has been really
helpful. The primary thing this ordinance does is adopt design guidelines for wireless infrastructure for
small cell facilities. He said they amended chapter 26 of the land use code to reference these guidelines.
Mr. Anderson summarized that was presented previously and the adjustments that have been made.
The carriers think our set up won’t be feasible. We certainly heard their comments on dimensions and
underground vaulting but think that what is going on in the industry. Denver is on version three of the
guidelines in response to these things and there will continue to be changes. There is a variation process
with HPC and P&Z. If the carrier can make the case for the variation, we will grant it.
44
4
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020
Staff recommends approval on second reading.
Mr. Anderson read a public comment from Ruth Krueger received last minute. She’s opposed to having
dangerous technology in her backyard. She’s satisfied with the level of service she has now. She
mentioned invasion of privacy. Many cities are refusing this to be allowed. It’s not compatible with our
special environment. Stand fast and just say no.
Councilwoman Richards said council received an email from John Bush regarding the original historic
streetlights. We need to keep the older street lights and use them in other places and preserve them.
She also wondered how we build a defense in advance because she doesn’t want every location to
receive a variation. It makes her nervous. Mr. Anderson said the carrier would have to make a
convincing case on our design guidelines not allowing their service to work. We have to be reasonable
in what we are asking of these folks and find an appropriate balance.
Andrea Bryan said that at present under our guidelines and using the AT&T master license as an
example, the providers are required to comply with federal law regarding emissions and health
concerns. Locally we don’t have the ability to regulate this. Unless the federal standards change, we just
need to comply with this and we can’t use health concerns to revoke a permit.
Councilwoman Richards said they are hearing a lot about carrier requirements, but we need to be
equally as strong about our community requirements. We are the first in the country to introduce the
parking system we have now. We didn’t want standard parking meters. There are a lot of examples of
the extent we’ve gone too on these things. We do we need to put into the ordinance that they need to
preserve our historic streetlights. Mayor Torre agreed that is what he is concerned about as well.
Tyler Christoff, Utilities Director, saidthat would be spelled out for the carriers from the get go.
Councilwoman Mullins said this is a really tough project with obstacles put forth by the feds and big
businesses. She thanked them for working so hard on this. She asked how we hold strong against the
creep of height or size. Mr. Anderson said there is discouragement on going in front of a board. AT&T
has wanted to work with us and they’ve been pretty close to what we want. Our guidelines force them
to be creative, and no one wants this to be adversarial. We do have a precedent for doing things
differently in Aspen. We work hard to protect things over time. It’s our blood, sweat and tears used to
make these things happen.
Councilman Hauenstein asked if we can cap this at 25 feet.
Ms. Bryan said we may be able to but could expose us to more risk. According to federal law, small cell
towers go up to heights of 50 feet. Having a variance process will reduce some of our legal exposure.
Councilman Hauenstein said he wants to hear public comment. He’s really sensitive to the invasion of
privacy comment as Ruth mentioned and he does think that is a valid concern.
Councilman Mesirow asked about public noticing. Mr. Anderson said that most applications will have to
submit for an administrative review since they don’t meet the guidelines. There won’t be a notice, but
after approval, it shows up in a box ad in the paper. There is a poster on site which explains what is
transpiring and a notice to the homes within 300 feet. The requirements are the same but will be
administrative with no public hearing. Councilman Mesirow said he accepts the 25-foot height instead of
the 20 feet. He’s concerned that all of this may backfire though. He said we need to alertpeople to what
45
5
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020
is happening and asked to take care with how we put this forward. He wants to make sure the public is
aware and wants to confirm that on generating reports, there’s a report generated which matches what
has been disclosed. Mr. Anderson said this is something we are still working on logistically and will
require us to build some staff expertise or hire out to a 3rd party consultant. It is our intention that
following installation and looking at facilities around town, we will do exactly what you described. We
can’t go beyond the FCC regulations, but we would be testing for compliance.
Mayor Torre asked Andrea for explanation for the public that she has previously shared with him. Ms.
Bryan said that longstanding laws and federal code dictates that local governments cannot regulate
wireless communications facilities based on health concerns. We can’t take a report regarding emissions
and use that to stop these facilities. Mayor Torre asked her for the “what if” council didn’t approve the
guidelines or if we denied installation and what would happen. Ms. Bryan said we would expose
ourselves to legal risk and it would be quite costly with not a very good outcome. She has taken a look at
all local Colorado cities and in the U.S. as a whole and examples of banning. None of those actually have
been able to ban it. Mill Valley is probably closest to a ban. We don’t have the ability under our state
law to ban small cell in any zone district.
Mayor Torre said we are concerned and have looked at this with a microscope and what our abilities are
to regulate this in our community.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Dr. Tom Lankering – Dr. Lankering said there are 40 cities and counties that have made steps to slow
down the installation of 5G and he is working with Coloradans for safe technology. The FCC is a
captured agency so the laws they put in are nothing more than bullies. There is an absence of safety
studies currently and it’s a real David vs. Goliath situation. Fiber optics already is an alternative to 5G
and the health concerns are very real. It is important for the health of our community to stand up
against Goliath. Until we have the safety studies, we don’t want to move forward with this. It’s a real
and serious concern.
Councilman Hauenstein said the frustration continues, and if we take on Goliath, we will incur
tremendous legal expenses. If there was a class action suit, we could want to participate in that to
challenge this. We do need the studies to show safety first, however, and then we can move forward.
Councilwoman Mullins said that she would reluctantly move forward with this and keep in mind that we
need to encourage any studies which look into the health risks. I suspect there are, but we don’t have
the studies. We will be accommodating what is required and nothing more and we will continue to
follow closely the federal guidelines and if they change at all, we will change with them.
Councilwoman Richards asked if there are any amendments to the resolution in the packet and Mr.
Anderson said no, they are recommending approval as presented.
Councilwoman Richards motioned to approve Ordinance #03, Series of 2020, Councilman Hauenstein
seconded.
Councilwoman Richards said this is something we are doing under duress. A federal shot clock, as it
were. If we do not pass this tonight, it wouldn’t stop someone from coming in to build out their 5 G
46
6
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020
system. Without our guidelines, it would be more of the wild west out there with no way to review the
way we hope to. It’s important to have guard rails in place on this and we need to be prepared.
Councilman Mesirow said he is grateful to be on this council with people who are focused on health and
aesthetic concerns. We’ve heard from everyone in the community and we are on the cutting edge
always. It’s important to have protections of our history and community aesthetic and community
values. We’ve made a good faith effort with this. We have a nation leading a system in place to identify
and measure and relate to the best science of the day. We can take our public health in our hands.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0, motion carried.
Councilwoman Richards motioned to adjourn, Councilman Mesirow seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0, motion carried.
______________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
47
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council
THROUGH: Phillip Supino, Community Development Director
FROM: Sarah Yoon, Preservation Planner; Community Development
MEMO DATE: May 4, 2020
MEETING DATE: May 12, 2020
RE: Call Up Notice, HPC approval for 134 E. Bleeker – Minor Development, Relocation,
and Setback Variations
APPLICANT:
Otis Real Estate
Holdings LLC, c/o Good
Property Company
REPRESENTATIVE:
BendonAdams
LOCATION:
Street Address:
134 E. Bleeker Street
Legal Description:
Lot S and the East ½ of
Lot R, Block 65, City and
Townsite of Aspen,
Colorado
Parcel Identification:
PID# 2737-073-15-002
CURRENT ZONING &
USE:
R-6 (Medium-Density
Residential); Single-
family home
PROPOSED USE:
No change
PROCESS SUMMARY: Certain land use approvals granted by HPC or
P&Z require that Council be notified of the decision through a brief staff
summary. The notification is not a public hearing and no applicant
presentation or public comment has been accepted in the past. During the
Call Up Notice, City Council may uphold the HPC or P&Z decision.
Alternatively, Council may request more detailed information be provided
through a presentation by staff and the applicant at a future meeting. After
hearing the additional project description, Council may uphold the boards’
decision or may remand it to require reconsideration of specific issues at a
new public hearing. HPC’s or P&Z’s decision on remand shall be final.
BACKGROUND: 134 E. Bleeker is a locally designated historic landmark
on a 4,500 sf lot in the R-6 zone district. The lot includes a Victorian home
and a historic secondary “barn” structure. Records indicate that these two
structures were relocated from Main Street to this site in the 1960s. The
existing non-historic addition was added during the 1992 redevelopment.
Site Locator Map – 134 E. Bleeker Street
134
48
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The applicant first submitted a proposal for Major Development that involved demolish of the existing non-
historic addition and construction of a new addition. This proposal also included a request for a parking
reduction and parking dimension variances. The applicant was given direction by HPC on March 11th to
restudy the form of the new addition and provide code compliant on-site parking. Following the HPC
meeting, the applicant returned with a revised scope of work that maintained the existing non-historic
addition and provided two full on-site parking spaces. The revised scope of work qualified for a Minor
Development review and was re-noticed.
On April 22nd, by a 4-0 vote, HPC approved the proposal for Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback
Variations with conditions. Approval was granted to underpin the historic home to excavate a basement
addition and make exterior changes to existing building materials and fenestration. Excavation for the
basement addition requires the historic home to be underpinned, which triggers historic preservation
relocation criteria, but no buildings will be moved for this proposal. The request for setback variations is to
memorialize the current location of the historic “barn” which currently sits in the east side yard setback and
the rear yard setback. The existing curb cut from Aspen Street will be removed and sidewalks are proposed
as required by the Engineering Department. The conditions of approval outline specific elements that need
staff and monitor approval, and the applicant will continue to work closely with relevant City Departments
regarding various elements in the tree dripline. Staff recommends Council uphold HPC’s decision.
Figure 1 – Approved East Elevation (from Aspen Street)
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommended approval of the project with conditions, and HPC agreed by a vote of 4-0. Staff
recommends Council uphold HPC’s decision.
Recommended Motion for Call-up
“I move to call-up HPC’s approval for 134 E. Bleeker Street – Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback
Variations.”
49
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________.
EXHIBITS:
A – HPC memo, April 22, 2020
B – HPC approved plans
C – Draft HPC meeting minutes, April 22, 2020
D – Draft HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020
50
Page 1 of 8
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
Memorandum
TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner
THROUGH: Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer
MEETING DATE: April 22, 2020
RE: 134 East Bleeker – Minor Development Review, Relocation, and Setback
Variations, PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICANT /OWNER:
Otis Real Estate Holdings LLC,
c/o Good Property Company
REPRESENTATIVE:
BendonAdams
LOCATION:
Street Address:
134 E. Bleeker Street
Legal Description:
Lot S and the East ½ of Lot R,
Block 65, City and Townsite of
Aspen, Colorado
Parcel Identification:
PID# 2737-073-15-002
CURRENT ZONING & USE
R-6 (Medium-Density
Residential); Residential
PROPOSED ZONING & USE:
No change
SUMMARY: In March, HPC reviewed a Major Development
application that involved demolition and replacement of the existing
addition to this historic resource. The Commission expressed a
number of concerns and continued the hearing. The applicant
subsequently revised the project scope and requests a Minor
Development review for proposed exterior material and
fenestration changes to the existing non-historic addition and the
secondary “barn” structure and underpinning the historic home to
enlarge the basement addition. The applicant seeks setback
variations for the “barn” structure to remain in its current location.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with
conditions identified on page 7 of this memo.
Site Locator Map – 134 E. Bleeker St.
134
51
Page 2 of 8
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
BACKGROUND:
134 East Bleeker Street is a designated historic landmark in the R-6 zone district on a 4,500sf corner lot.
This property contains a miner’s cabin and a historic barn structure that were both moved to this site
from 418 E. Main Street in the 1960s. The spatial relationship between the two historic structures were
maintained on the new receiving site. 134 E. Bleeker was landmarked and redeveloped with the addition
that exists today in 1992.
Figure 1 – 134 E. Bleeker, 1980 Figure 2 – 134 E. Bleeker, 2020
REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals:
• Minor Development (Section 26.415.070.C) for materials and fenestration changes to the existing
non-historic addition and secondary historic resource.
• Relocation (Section 26.415.090.C) for underpinning the historic house to enlarge the basement.
• Setback Variations (Section 26.415.110.C) for the existing historic secondary “barn” structure to
remain in its current location.
The HPC is the final review authority, however, this project is subject to Call-Up Notice by City Council.
PROJECT SUMMARY:
Since the last March 11th HPC meeting, the applicant has revised the scope of work which now qualifies
for a Minor Development review. The applicant proposes to maintain the existing non-historic addition
with changes to exterior materials and fenestration. Excavation to expand the existing basement is
proposed and will require the underpinning of the historic home. The secondary “barn” structure is to
remain detached with alterations to materials and fenestration to the east and north elevations of the
secondary structure. Two full on-site parking spaces are proposed with this revised design, and setback
variations are requested to maintain the location of the historic secondary resource which is currently
in the rear and east side yard setbacks.
52
Page 3 of 8
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
STAFF COMMENTS:
This corner lot property is highly visible from both Bleeker Street and Aspen Street, and as part of this
project, the applicant is asked to remove the existing garage and driveway curb cut from Aspen Street,
which is a benefit to the streetscape. Staff supports the applicant’s proposal to restore the roofs on
both historic resources to wood shingles and to paint existing siding, and the request for setback
variations to memorialize the existing location of the secondary “barn” structure. Staff recommends
HPC further discuss the proposed secondary entrance to the home and exterior details regarding the
changes proposed to the barn structure.
The following points go into more detail regarding the proposal for HPC discussion:
1. Site Planning & Landscape Design: The proposed expansion of the basement requires
excavation and underpinning of the historic house which triggers Relocation review. According
to Design Guideline 9.1, underpinning the historic resource for excavation is appropriate, and the
structural assessment and financial assurance for the historic resource will be required.
Additionally, details regarding excavation and waterline locations will need to be reviewed by
the relevant City Departments. (See Exhibit B for details.) All subgrade living space, including
lightwells, are within the setbacks, as proposed. In compliance with Design Guideline 9.6, staff
recommends a curb height of 6” or less for the proposed lightwell.
The proposed landscape plan introduces two new cottonwood street trees along Aspen Street,
and on-site planting beds and shrubs. Concerning the plantings along the west side of the
property, staff recommends reducing the shrubs closest to the historic house for the protection
of the resource (Design Guideline 1.13).
An existing non-historic fence is to be removed and replaced with a more contemporary 42” tall
wooden fence. Design Guideline 1.19 requires a low vertical picket fence allowing a level of
transparency for Victorian properties. The proposed horizontal board fence would be
appropriate around the addition, but staff recommends a vertical picket fence around the historic
home to meet the Design Guidelines.
The proposal introduces new sidewalks along both streets since the property is in a mandated
sidewalk zone. Related to these improvements, the applicant plans to reconfigure the front
walkway to the historic resource and the secondary walkway from Aspen Street. Due to the
dripline of an exiting tree, a meandering front walkway is considered appropriate (Design
Guideline 1.6).
The proposed secondary walkway leads to a vestibule located in the two-story connector. The
pathway is incorporated into an expanded patio area. While the applicant has addressed staff
concerns related to having the historic front door enter into a bedroom as indicated in the March
53
Page 4 of 8
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
plan set, staff is still concerned that the secondary pathway will look and function as the primary
entry for the home. Staff recommends this pathway be restudied to better meet Design
Guideline 10.9 & 4.1.
Figure 3 – Proposed Landscape Plan
Staff supports the overall site plan and the provision of two full parking spaces. The proposed
landscape plan is appropriate with the recommendation to reduce plantings that are too close to
the historic home. Staff recommends the further restudy of the proposed secondary walkway to
better meet the Design Guidelines 10.9 & 4.1.
2. Historic Resource – Secondary Structure: The historic secondary “barn” structure is two stories
tall with livable space on the top floor and a parking space on the ground floor. This space was
previously approved as an ADU which the applicant is in the process of removing with a cash-in-
lieu payment through a separate administrative process. This structure was relocated with the
historic home and significant areas of exterior material was replaced during the 1990’s remodel.
The revised design maintains the secondary structure as a detached structure above grade with
a new subgrade connection proposed to access the rest of the house. On the ground level, the
design incorporates a large garage door opening on the north (alley) elevation to accommodate
for a full-sized parking space within the structure. Staff supports the adaptive reuse of the “barn”
with the garage door facing the alley, but recommends further study on if the garage door can
be pulled in slightly at the corners and still provide adequate clearance.
With the removal of the curb cut along Aspen Street, the existing single-car garage door on the
non-historic shed roof addition to the “barn” is to be replaced with siding and new windows. The
54
Page 5 of 8
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
siding is proposed to match existing conditions. Two 4 over 4 windows are proposed on the east
elevation. The Design Guidelines call for new features to be distinguished from historic features
through subtle changes to style and/or detail. The proposed 4 over 4 design detail closely
mimics historic window design making it difficult to distinguish new and historic windows.
Figure 4 – Proposed East Elevation Figure 5 – Proposed North Elevation
(Secondary “barn” Structure) (Secondary “barn” Structure)
Staff supports the adaptive reuse of the secondary “barn” structure and the alterations to
material and fenestration with the recommendation to further study the window details on the
east elevation and the overall length of the garage door on the north elevation.
3. Non-Historic Addition: Materials & Fenestration: The applicant has made the decision to
maintain the existing non-historic addition to the historic house and make minor changes to
materials and fenestration. These changes include updating existing glazing and painting the
siding. According to Design Guideline 10.6, the additions needs to be recognized as a product
of its own time, but visual compatibility must be achieved by relating to two of the following
characteristics: form, material and fenestration. No changes are proposed to the existing scale
and form of the addition.
Materials: Horizontal wood siding is the unifying material seen throughout the entire project.
The applicant proposes to paint the wood siding, which is considered an appropriate finish. New
roofing material is proposed for the entire project.
Fenestration: The proposed fenestration changes deviates from what is found on the historic
resources. The most significant areas for change are concentrated on the west elevation which
faces the adjacent lot.
55
Page 6 of 8
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
Staff finds the proposed changes to material and fenestration maintains a compatible
relationship with the historic resources. Staff requests additional information regarding
exterior vents and flues, and gutters and snow stops that may be added to all of the roofs.
4. Setback Variations: The applicant proposes to maintain the existing footprint of the secondary
structure in its current location. No new development is proposed beyond the setbacks. Staff
supports the request for setback variations to memorialize the current location of the resource.
No historic resources are being moved and the historic home will remain in its location 5’ behind
the front yard setback.
The historic secondary “barn” structure is currently in the rear and east side yard setbacks. The
following setback variations are requested to maintain its current location:
• 8’-4” rear yard setback reduction
• 3’-3” east side yard setback reduction
In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance:
a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district;
and/or
b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural
character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or
historic district.
Staff supports the request for setback variations to maintain the existing location of the historic
secondary structure since it meets all of the required criteria.
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
The application was referred out to other City Departments who have requirements that will
significantly affect the permit review. The following is a summary of comments received. See Exhibit B.
Engineering Department:
1. Coordinate with the Electric Department ensuring transformer upgrade is feasible. (Resolved)
2. At building permit, the following needs to be addressed:
• City of Aspen compliant survey is required
• Sidewalks required on both sides of the property
• Inspect curb and gutter and replacement of damaged areas required
• Emergency overflow path for drywell must be called out in civil plans and drainage report
• Water service line location in the front yard needs to stay out of tree drip line. Parks
Dept. approval needed.
• Submit soils report containing percolation test
56
Page 7 of 8
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
• Submit letter from structural engineer stating location of drywell will not compromise the
integrity of the structures. Any redesign of the drywell needs to adhere to City
Standards.
Parks Department:
1. Snow melted sidewalk must be 5’ away from the tree trunk (#6917 on City of Aspen tree inventory)
on Aspen Street.
2. Relocate waterline out of the tree dripline to the west property line. Parks to review revised
waterline plans.
3. More details on how excavation of the basement will occur.
4. Review of CMP when available.
Zoning Department:
1. Comments on floor area calculations.
2. Clarification of setbacks on sub-grade drawings.
Building Department:
1. Gross fire area over 5,000 sf triggers fire sprinklers.
2. Areas where roof projections are less than 3 feet from the property line need to be 1 hour fire-
resistance rated on the underside.
3. Snow stops required at all roof pitches that shed to walkways, driveways and window wells.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the HPC approve this application with the following conditions:
1. The following setback variations are approved for the existing historic secondary “barn”
structure:
• 8’-4” rear yard setback reduction above and below grade
• 3’-3” east side yard setback reduction above and below grade
2. Restudy the secondary walkway to minimize its visual presence and meet Design Guidelines 10.9
& 4.1, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit submission.
3. Provide detailed information regarding vents and flues, gutters and snow stops, to be reviewed
and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit submission.
4. Design the lightwell curb height to be 6” or less in height.
5. Revise window details on the east elevation of the secondary structure to meet Design Guideline
10.6, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor.
6. Work closely with relevant City Departments regarding work in the dripline of trees, particularly
the location of the waterline and sidewalks.
7. Minimize the length of the proposed garage door on the north elevation, to be reviewed and
approved by staff and monitor.
57
Page 8 of 8
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
8. Restudy the fence design around the historic home to meet Design Guideline 1.19, to be reviewed
and approved by staff and monitor.
9. Reduce plantings on the west side of the historic home, to be reviewed and approved by staff
and monitor.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution #____, Series of 2020
Exhibit A.1 – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria /Staff Findings
Exhibit A.2 – Setback Variations Review Criteria /Staff Findings
Exhibit B – Referral Comments
Exhibit C – Application
58
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date IssueBIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:07 PM
A.1.00
COVER134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
59
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
AA
D
D
SETBACK
SETBACK SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE10' - 0"5' - 0"10' - 0"5' - 0"F F
N. ASPEN ST.
E. BLEEKER ST.
7895.0'3' - 1" EXISTING SETBACKEXISTING SETBACK
14' - 11"
1' - 8" EXISTING SETBACK
1' - 8" EXISTING SETBACKDISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS
5' - 0 1/2"45' - 0"100' - 0"
100' - 0"45' - 0"10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
4'8'16'0
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:09 PM
A.1.01
(E) SITE PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (E) SITE
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
60
7
8
9
5
789578957
8
9
5
78958
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
AA
D
SETBACK
SETBACK
SETBACK
SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEF F
14' - 11 3/4"
N. ASPEN ST.
E. BLEEKER ST.
SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"
SLOPE
10 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"
SLOPE
10 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE3 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"
SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE
12" : 12"
SLOPE
12" : 12"
SLOPE
4" : 12"
SLOPE
4" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"45' - 0"100' - 0"
100' - 0"45' - 0"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
4'8'16'0
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:11 PM
A.1.02
(P) SITE PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (P) SITE
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
61
UP
DN
DN
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
DNUP
LIGHT WELL COVER
LIGHT WELL COVEROPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO
BELOW DN
DN
OPEN TO BELOW
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
As indicatedBIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:15 PM
A.1.03
AREA CALCULATION -
HISTORIC/PROPOSED134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"1 (E) MAIN LEVEL - Area Calculations
1/8" = 1'-0"3 (E) UPPER LEVEL - Area Calculations
AREA TOTAL = 1704 SF
AREA TOTAL = 1404 SF
AREA TOTAL = 1648 SF
AREA TO BE REMOVED = 56 SF
EXISTING REMOVED ADDED
AREA = 623 SFAREA = 448 SF AREA = 333 SF
AREA = 597 SF AREA = 579 SF
AREA = 503 SF
AREA = 604 SF
AREA = 597 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"2 (P) MAIN LEVEL - Area Calculations
AREA TO BE ADDED = 0 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"4 (P) UPPER LEVEL - Area Calculations
AREA TOTAL = 1387 SF
AREA TO BE REMOVED = 39 SF
AREA TO BE ADDED = 22 SF
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
AREA = 428 SF AREA = 627 SF AREA = 332 SF
GARAGE AREA = 405 SF
AREA = 67 SF
62
UP
LIGHT WELL
A A1
C
D
B
B1
C1
D1
BASEMENT AREA 694 SQFT 9' - 7 1/4"SUB GRADE WALL AREA = 336 SF 8' - 9 1/2"A A1
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 42 SF
5' - 10 1/4"14' - 3 1/2"12' - 2 1/2"
5' - 3"
SUB GRADE WALL AREA = 259 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 64 SF
B B1
10' - 4 1/2"11' - 10 1/8"8' - 1" 8 1/2"
1' - 7 1/4"
2' - 10"
2 1/2"
5' - 1 3/4" 7"8' - 9 1/2"C C1
SUB GRADE WALL AREA = 290 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 3 SF8' - 9 1/2"9' - 8 3/4"7' - 5 3/4"1' - 3 1/2"11 1/2"1' - 3 3/8"
2' - 3 1/2"
D D1
SUB GRADE WALL AREA = 230 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 20 SF8' - 9 1/2"9' - 7 1/4"7 7/8" 5' - 0 3/8"1' - 4 1/4"
7' - 0 1/2" 6' - 4 3/4"8' - 11"
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/8" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:16 PM
A.1.04
(E) FLOOR AREA
CALCULATION -
SUBGRADE134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
TM
Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"1
(E) BASEMENT - FAR - SUBGRADE WALL
COVERAGE
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
63
20' - 8 1/2"10' - 9"12' - 9"22' - 6"11' - 6"LIGHT WELL
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
BASEMENT FLOOR AREA = 2412 SF
10' - 5 1/2"9' - 3 1/2"
WALL AREA = 97 SF
EXPOSED AREA = 0 SF 10' - 5 1/2"11' - 7"
WALL AREA = 121 SF
EXPOSED AREA = 0 SF 10' - 5 1/2"31' - 7"
WALL AREA = 330 SF
EXPOSED AREA = 0 SF
6' - 0 1/2"5' - 10"WALL AREA = 24 SF
EXPOSED AREA = 24 SF 10' - 5 1/2"33' - 8 1/2"
TOTAL WALL AREA = 353 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF10' - 5 1/2"48' - 4 3/4"
TOTAL WALL AREA = 506 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF
10' - 5 1/2"22' - 0 1/2"
WALL AREA = 231 SF
EXPOSED AREA = 0 SF 10' - 5 1/2"3' - 0"3' - 8"WALL AREA = 31 SF
EXPOSED AREA = 20 SF
WALL AREA = 31 SF
EXPOSED AREA = 20 SF 10' - 5 1/2"3' - 0"3' - 8"29' - 6"10' - 5 1/2"TOTAL WALL AREA = 236 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF 10' - 5 1/2"14' - 10"
3' - 0"6' - 9 1/2"3' - 8"TOTAL WALL AREA = 155 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 20 SF 10' - 5 1/2"6' - 9 1/2"3' - 0"
12' - 2"3' - 8"TOTAL WALL AREA = 127 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 20 SF 8' - 4 5/8"11' - 10"
TOTAL WALL AREA = 54 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF
10' - 5 1/2"3' - 0"
TOTAL WALL AREA = 31 SF
EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
As indicatedBIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:20 PM
A.1.05
(P)FLOOR AREA
CALCULATIONS -
SUBGRADE134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"1
(P) BASEMENT - SUBGRADE WALL
COVERAGE
1/4" = 1'-0"N (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - N
1/4" = 1'-0"M (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - M
1/4" = 1'-0"K (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - K
1/4" = 1'-0"I (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - I
1/4" = 1'-0"G (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - G
1/4" = 1'-0"A (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - A
1/4" = 1'-0"L (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - L
1/4" = 1'-0"J (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - J
1/4" = 1'-0"H (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - H1/4" = 1'-0"F (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - F
1/4" = 1'-0"B (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - B
1/4" = 1'-0"C (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - C
1/4" = 1'-0"D (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - D
1/4" = 1'-0"E (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - E
64
UP
(E) PORCH
OPEN TO BELOW
(E) PORCH
AREA = 40 SF
LIGHT WELL COVER
LIGHT WELL COVER
OPEN TO BELOW
(E) PORCH
AREA = 40 SF
(E) PORCH
(E) DECK
AREA = 45 SF
AREA = 54 SF
AREA = 597 SF AREA = 579 SF GARAGE AREA = 405 SF
AREA = 67 SF
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/8" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:22 PM
A.1.06
FLOOR AREA
CALCULATION - MAIN
LEVEL134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
AREA = 597 SF
AREA = 604 SF
AREA = 503 SF
AREA = 85 SF AREA = 85 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"1 (E) MAIN LEVEL - FAR
1/8" = 1'-0"3 (P) MAIN LEVEL - FAR
FLOOR AREA = 1320 SF
EXEMPT = 552 SF
FLOOR AREA = 1329 SF
EXEMPT = 500 SF
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
GARAGE EXEMPTION = 375 SF
GROSS FLOOR AREA = 1829 SF
GARAGE EXEMPTION = 328 SF
GROSS FLOOR AREA = 1872 SF
65
DN
DN
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO
BELOW DN
DN
OPEN TO BELOW
AREA = 428 SF AREA = 627 SF
AREA = 332 SF
AREA = 48 SF
AREA = 51 SF
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/8" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:25 PM
A.1.07
FLOOR AREA
CALCULATION -
UPPER LEVEL134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
AREA = 448 SF
AREA = 623 SF
AREA = 333 SF
AREA = 67 SF
AREA = 48 SF
1/8" = 1'-0"1 (E) UPPER LEVEL - FAR
1/8" = 1'-0"2 (P) UPPER LEVEL - FAR
FLOOR AREA = 1387 SF
EXEMPT = 99 SF
FLOOR AREA = 1404 SF
EXEMPT = 115 SF
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
GROSS FLOOR AREA = 1519 SF GROSS FLOOR AREA = 1486 SF
66
SETBACK
SETBACK SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
AA
D
D
F F
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:26 PM
A.2.00
(E) BASEMENT FLOOR
PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (E) BASEMENT
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
67
SETBACK
SETBACK SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
AA
D
D
5' - 7 5/8"
F F
100' - 0"
10' - 0"45' - 0"DN
UP
UP
UP
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:33 PM
A.2.01
(E) MAIN FLOOR PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (E) MAIN LEVEL
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
68
SETBACK
SETBACK SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
AA
D
D
F F4' - 7 1/4"OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
DN
DN
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:36 PM
A.2.02
(E) UPPER LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"2 (E) UPPER LEVEL
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
69
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
AA
D
D
SETBACK
SETBACK SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEF F
SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"
SLOPE
10 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"
SLOPE
10 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE
12" : 12"
SLOPE
12" : 12"
SLOPE
4" : 12"
SLOPE
4" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE3 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"
SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:39 PM
A.2.03
(E) ROOF PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (E) Roof
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
70
DN
A
B
C
D
E
F G
I
H
J
K
L
M
N
OP
R
S
T
U
Q
AA
BB
CC
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/8" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:50 PM
A.2.04
WALL DEMOLITION
PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
TM
Checker
1/8" = 1'-0"1 DEMO PLAN - MAIN LEVEL
1/8" = 1'-0"2 DEMO PLAN - UPPER LEVEL
1/8" = 1'-0"3 Elevation 1 - A
1/8" = 1'-0"4 Elevation 2 - B
1/8" = 1'-0"5 Elevation 3 - C
1/8" = 1'-0"6 Elevation 4 - D
1/8" = 1'-0"7 Elevation 5 - E
1/8" = 1'-0"8 Elevation 6 - F
1/8" = 1'-0"9 Elevation 7 - G
1/8" = 1'-0"10 Elevation 8 - H
1/8" = 1'-0"11 Elevation 9 - I
1/8" = 1'-0"12 Elevation 10 - J
1/8" = 1'-0"13 Elevation 11 - K
1/8" = 1'-0"14 Elevation 12 - L
1/8" = 1'-0"15 Elevation 13 - M
1/8" = 1'-0"16 Elevation 14 - N
1/8" = 1'-0"17 Elevation 15 - O
1/8" = 1'-0"18 Elevation 16 - P
1/8" = 1'-0"19 Elevation 18 - R
1/8" = 1'-0"20 Elevation 19 - S
1/8" = 1'-0"21 Elevation 20 - T
1/8" = 1'-0"22 Elevation 21 - U
1/8" = 1'-0"23 Elevation 22 - AA
1/8" = 1'-0"24 Elevation 23 - BB
1/8" = 1'-0"25 Elevation 24 - CC
WALL AREA = 243 sf
FENESTRATION = 51 sf
WALL AREA = 106sf WALL AREA = 94 sf
FENESTRATION = 50 sf
WALL AREA = 285 sf
FENESTRATION = 55 sf
WALL AREA = 161 sf
FENESTRATION = 31 sf
WALL AREA = 113 sf
FENESTRATION = 40 sf
WALL AREA = 27sf WALL AREA = 294 sf
FENESTRATION = 152 sf
WALL AREA = 12sf WALL AREA = 12sf WALL AREA = 75 sf
FENESTRATION = 24sf
WALL AREA = 46 sf
WALL AREA = 340 sf
FENESTRATION = 58 sf
WALL AREA = 517 sf
FENESTRATION = 93 sf
AREA TO BE REMOVED = 70 sf
WALL AREA = 62 sf
AREA TO BE REMOVED = 29 sf
1/8" = 1'-0"26 Elevation 17 - Q
WALL AREA = 113 sf
FENESTRATION = 17sf
WALL AREA = 445 sf
FENESTRATION = 77 sf
WALL AREA = 488 sf
FENESTRATION = 70 sf
AREA TO BE REMOVED = 18.5 sf
WALL AREA = 144 sf
AREA TO BE REMOVED = 88.5 sf
WALL AREA = 488 sf
FENESTRATION = 122 sf
AREA TO BE REMOVED = 169 sf
WALL AREA = 308 sf
FENESTRATION = 33 sf
WALL AREA = 49 sf WALL AREA = 113 sf
FENESTRATION = 17 sf
WALL AREA = 162 sf
FENESTRATION = 44 sf
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
71
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:51 PM
A.2.05
ROOF DEMOLITION
PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
TM
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (E) Roof - FAR
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N O P
Q R
S T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
BB
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
72
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
AA
D
D
F F
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK
SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACKSETBACK10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:52 PM
A.2.06
(P) CRAWLSPACE
PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (P) CRAWLSPACE
73
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK
SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
AA
D
DSETBACKLAUNDRY
MUDROOM
BEDROOM 2
BEDROOM 1
BATH 1
F F6' - 3"11' - 11"14' - 4"5' - 9 1/4"38' - 3 5/32"12' - 3"16' - 0"10' - 7 1/2"22' - 8 1/2"5' - 7" 7' - 10"8' - 4"
83' - 4"
CLOSET
BATH 3 BEDROOM 3
CLOSET 1
BASEMENT GALLERY
BATH 2
4' - 10 1/2"9' - 2"3' - 0"6' - 3"3' - 0" 9"8' - 6"3' - 9"16' - 0"
6' - 2"6' - 7"
12' - 9"19' - 2"
3' - 9"9' - 0"3' - 3"16' - 0"10' - 7 1/2"10"6' - 0"10' - 6 1/2"4' - 10"10' - 11"5' - 6"5' - 5"11' - 6"2' - 7"10' - 9"4' - 10"3' - 10"22' - 6 1/2"5' - 7" 3' - 7"3' - 0"16' - 0"11' -0" DRYWELL3' - 4"12' - 9"10' - 5 1/2"1' - 2" 3' - 2"1' - 0"9' - 2"2' - 0"11' - 2"2' - 0"1' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 1"3' - 7 7/8"3' - 0"3' - 5"8' - 11"16' - 0"5' - 0"7' - 2"5' - 2"11' - 11 1/2"
6' - 8"8' - 3 1/2"
10' - 0 1/2"
16' - 1"9' - 1"9' - 8 1/2"
2' - 1"3' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"5' - 11 1/2"2' - 1 1/2"6' - 4"SETBACK2' - 9"5' - 7 1/2"
RECREATION ROOM
UP UP
T.O.F.F. @ BASEMENT
EL. = 87' -0"
T.O.F.F. @ BASEMENT
EL. = 89' -0"W03W04 5' - 0"1' - 8"5' - 0"10' - 0"
2' - 0"2' - 0"
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:55 PM
A.2.07
(P) BASEMENT FLOOR
PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (P) BASEMENT
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
74
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
AA
11' - 11"12' - 3"16' - 0"10' - 7 1/2"22' - 8 1/2"5' - 7"16' - 2"
83' - 4"
83' - 4"
D
D23' - 5 11/16"12' - 3"16' - 0"10' - 7 1/2"22' - 8 1/2"5' - 7" 7' - 10"8' - 4"
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK
SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK8' - 4"
10' - 0"
1' - 8"
7' - 10"5' - 7"
F F9' - 0 5/16"5' - 9 5/32"11' - 7 1/2"32' - 0 1/8"T.O.F.F. @GARAGE
EL. = 100' -0"
T.O.F.F. @ MAIN LEVEL
EL. = 100' -0"
T.O.F.F. @ VICTORIAN
EL. = 101' -0"
(P) FIREPLACE3' - 9 5/8"5' - 6"3' - 9 5/8"4' - 0"OPEN TO BELOW
9' - 3 3/4"3' - 6"14' - 10"24' - 11 1/4"0"6' - 6"DINING ROOM LIVING ROOM
VESTIBULE
12' - 1 3/4"
KITCHEN GARAGE
DN
UP
DNUP
14' - 6 1/8"11' - 10 7/8"9' - 10 1/2"15' - 6 7/8"
6' - 6 1/2"15' - 0"15' - 1 3/4"6' - 11"3' - 10"3' - 0"3' - 0"LIGHT WELL COVER
LIGHT WELL COVER
1' - 5"
W10 W11
D01D02W1215' - 2 7/8"
_______
A.6.00
3
2
A.6.00
1
A.6.00
5' - 1"10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:56 PM
A.2.08
(P) MAIN FLOOR PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (P) MAIN LEVEL
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
75
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
AA
D
D
16' - 0"10' - 7 1/2"22' - 8 1/2"5' - 7"16' - 2"5' - 9 1/4"23' - 5 3/4"83' - 4"11' - 11"20' - 1 5/32"32' - 0 1/8"MASTER BEDROOM
MASTER BATH
5' - 7"16' - 2"22' - 8 1/2"
F F
T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL
EL. = 110' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL
EL. = 110' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL
EL. = 109' -6 3/4"OPEN TO
BELOW
2' - 6 5/8" 5" 3' - 4"5' - 10"3' - 4"4 1/2"3' - 0"GUEST BATH
MASTER CLOSET
POWDER
MASTER HALLWAY
DN
4' - 0"6' - 10"10' - 3 3/4"5' - 6"3' - 10"3' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 10"7' - 3"11' - 0 5/8"7' - 2 1/4"6' - 10"6' - 7"15' - 9"2' - 1"11' - 2 3/4"2' - 0"2' - 1"8' - 6 1/2"4' - 9 1/2"3' - 5"3' - 2 1/2"2' - 0"7' - 8 53/128"4' - 7 3/8"8' - 5"3' - 0 1/2"
DN 3' - 0"3' - 0"
GUEST BEDROOM
W20 W21
OPEN TO BELOW
OPEN TO BELOW
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:57 PM
A.2.09
(P) UPPER LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (P) UPPER LEVEL
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
76
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EE
CC
B
B
AA
D
D
SETBACK
SETBACK PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEF F
SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"
SLOPE
10 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"
SLOPE
10 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE3 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"
SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE
13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE
12" : 12"
SLOPE
12" : 12"
SLOPE
4" : 12"
SLOPE
4" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE12" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"SLOPE13 1/2" : 12"10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
NCopyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:40:57 PM
A.2.10
(P) ROOF PLAN134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
TM
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (P) Roof
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
(E) SKYLIGHT TO REMAIN, NEW GLASS AS NEEDED
77
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
(E) ROOF
125' -2 1/2"
(E) ROOF
125' -2 1/2"
E C B AD
B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION
118' -4 1/2"
B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION
118' -4 1/2"
F
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE
109' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE
109' -8 1/2"20' - 1"ROOF HEIGHT CALC.3' - 3 41/64"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
E C B AD
(N) Roof
125' -2 1/2"
(N) Roof
125' -2 1/2"
F
21' - 11"T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE
109' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE
109' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E)
VICTORIAN
110' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E)
VICTORIAN
110' -8 1/2"ROOF HEIGHT CALC.6
1210 5/8"(N) ROOFING TO REPLACE
EXISTING. TYP
(E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP.(N) WINDOWS TO REPLACE (E)
U.O.N. PER HISTORIC PRES.
(N) GARAGE DOOR TO MATCH
HORIZONTAL SIDING
(E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP.
D01
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:41:10 PM
A.3.04
NORTH ELEVATIONS134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
TM
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (E) NORTH ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"2 (P) NORTH ELEVATION
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
78
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
(E) ROOF
125' -2 1/2"
(E) ROOF
125' -2 1/2"
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL ADDITION
110' -10 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL ADDITION
110' -10 1/2"
B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION
118' -4 1/2"
B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION
118' -4 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
CEILING HEIGHT -MAIN LEVEL
109' -8 1/2"
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
(N) Roof
125' -2 1/2"
(N) Roof
125' -2 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE
109' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E)
VICTORIAN
110' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E)
VICTORIAN
110' -8 1/2"3' - 6 7/8"11 1/4"(N) ROOFING TO REPLACE
EXISTING. TYP
(E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP.(N) WINDOWS TO REPLACE (E)
U.O.N. PER HISTORIC PRES.
(N) SIDING TO MATCH (E) TYP.
(E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP.
W20W21
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:41:23 PM
A.3.05
WEST ELEVATIONS134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
TM
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (E) WEST ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"2 (P) WEST ELEVATION
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
79
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
(E) ROOF
125' -2 1/2"
(E) ROOF
125' -2 1/2"
ECBAD
B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION
118' -4 1/2"
B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION
118' -4 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
F
20' - 1"T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E)
VICTORIAN
110' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E)
VICTORIAN
110' -8 1/2"ROOF HEIGHT CALC.MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
CEILING HEIGHT -MAIN LEVEL
109' -8 1/2"
CEILING HEIGHT -MAIN LEVEL
109' -8 1/2"
ECBAD
(N) Roof
125' -2 1/2"
(N) Roof
125' -2 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
F
15' - 8 3/8"T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E)
VICTORIAN
110' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E)
VICTORIAN
110' -8 1/2"ROOF HEIGHT CALC.3' - 6"9 7/8"(N) ROOFING TO REPLACE
EXISTING. TYP
(E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP.(N) WINDOWS TO REPLACE (E)
U.O.N. PER HISTORIC PRES.
W12
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:41:37 PM
A.3.06
SOUTH ELEVATIONS134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
TM
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (E) SOUTH ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"2 (P) SOUTH ELEVATION
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
80
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
(E) ROOF
125' -2 1/2"
(E) ROOF
125' -2 1/2"
87654321
T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL ADDITION
110' -10 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL ADDITION
110' -10 1/2"
B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION
118' -4 1/2"
B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION
118' -4 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
(P) BASEMENT CEILING
98' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
MAIN LEVEL
100' -0"
CEILING HEIGHT -MAIN LEVEL
109' -8 1/2"
CEILING HEIGHT -MAIN LEVEL
109' -8 1/2"
87654321
(N) Roof
125' -2 1/2"
(N) Roof
125' -2 1/2"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN
101' -0"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE
109' -8 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E)
VICTORIAN
110' -8 1/2"3' - 6 7/8"11 1/4"(N) ROOFING TO REPLACE
EXISTING. TYP
(N) PORCH(E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP.(N) WINDOWS TO REPLACE (E)
U.O.N. PER HISTORIC PRES.
(E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP.
W10 W11
D02
1/4" = 1'-0"1 (E) EAST ELEVATION
1/4" = 1'-0"2 (P) EAST ELEVATION
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:41:49 PM
A.3.07
EAST ELEVATIONS134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
TM
Checker
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
81
F.F.
+0'-0"
F.F.
+0'-0"
TYPE A TYPE B
TYPE CPER SCHED.PER SCHED.PER SCHED.PER SCHED.PER SCHED.PER SCHED.PER SCHED.PER SCHED.PER SCHED.
EGRESS WINDOW SINGLE PANE FIXED
DIVIDED LITE FIXED
TYPE D
DOUBLE HUNGPER SCHED. PER SCHED.
PER SCHED.
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:41:51 PM
A.4.00
WINDOW SCHEDULE134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
Proposed Window Schedule
Window ID Room Name
Type
Mark Description Width Height Sill Height
Window
Frame
Material
Window
Exterior
Finish
Window
Interior
Finish
Black Out
Shade 5% Shade Detail Head Detail Jamb Detail Sill Glazing
Hardware
Group Remarks
(P) BASEMENT
W01 BEDROOM 1 A EGRESS WINDOW 3' - 0" 6' - 9 1/2" 4' - 2 1/2"
W02 BEDROOM 2 A EGRESS WINDOW 3' - 0" 6' - 9 1/2" 4' - 2 1/2"
W03 BEDROOM 3 A EGRESS WINDOW 3' - 0" 6' - 9 1/2" 4' - 2 1/2"
W04 HALLWAY B FIXED SINGLE PANE 3' - 0" 6' - 9 1/2" 4' - 2 1/2"
MAIN LEVEL
W10 GARAGE B FIXED SINGLE PANE 2' - 3" 5' - 0 1/2" 2' - 0"
W11 GARAGE B FIXED SINGLE PANE 2' - 3" 5' - 0 1/2" 2' - 0"
W12 LIVING/KITCHEN B FIXED SINGLE PANE 3' - 11
3/16"
4' - 1 1/2" 3' - 5 1/2"
T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN
W20 MASTER BATH B FIXED SINGLE PANE 5' - 0" 8' - 6" 1' - 0"
W21 MASTER BATH B FIXED SINGLE PANE 2' - 6" 6' - 0" 1' - 0"
DOOR/WINDOW NOTES
1. SIZES GIVEN ARE NOMINAL. SEE DETAILS TO DETERMINE UNIT SIZES AND ROUGH
OPENING DIMENSIONS.
2. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO ORDERING/MANUFACTURING
DOORS AND WINDOWS.
3 ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS TO MEET .32 U-VALUE PER PITKIN COUNTY
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
82
F.F.
+0'-0"TYPE A
GARAGE DOORPER SCHED.PER SCHED.PER SCHED.
TYPE B
GLASS DOORPER. SCHED.PER. SCHED.
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1/4" = 1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:41:52 PM
A.4.01
DOOR SCHEDULE -
EXTERIOR134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
Door Schedule - Exterior
DOOR ID Location Type Mark Width Height Thickness Door Finish
Frame
Material
Frame
Exterior
Finish
Frame
Interior
Finish
Black Out
Shade 5% Shade
Roman
Shade Detail Head Detail Jamb Detail Sill Glazing
Hardware
Group Remarks
New Construction
D01 GARAGE A 21' - 4
11/16"
8' - 0" 0' - 1 3/4"
D02 VESTIBULE B 3' - 0" 6' - 10" 0' - 0 1/2"
D05 B 2' - 6" 9' - 0" 0' - 0 1/2"
D06 B 2' - 6" 9' - 0" 0' - 0 1/2"
GENERAL DOOR/WINDOW NOTES
1. SIZES GIVEN ARE NOMINAL. SEE DETAILS TO DETERMINE UNIT SIZES AND ROUGH
OPENING DIMENSIONS.
2. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO ORDERING/MANUFACTURING
DOORS AND WINDOWS.
3 ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS TO MEET .32 U-VALUE PER PITKIN COUNTY
DOOR TYPE SCHEDULE
KEY DOOR/WINDOW NOTES
1 MANUFACTURER LEVEL 1 : "FRONT OF HOUSE" TO INCLUDE ALBERTINI (STEEL OR ALUMINUM), DYNAMIC ALUMINUM, MHB, OPTIMUM OR SIM. STEEL MANUFACTURER
2 MANUFACTURER LEVEL 2 : "BACK OF HOUSE" TO INCLUDE SIERRA PACIFIC, MARVIN, EUROLINE, AND PELLA
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
83
RIGID INSULATION AT PERIMETER
OF GYPCRETE
3/4" FINISH WOOD FLOORING , ALLOW 1/2"
GAP TO FOUNDATION WALL
LAYER OF T&G PLYWD., S.S.D.
FLOOR JOIST , S.S.D.
DRAINAGE PLANE
3" OF SPRAY IN RIGID INSULATION & BATT
INSULATION TO FILL REMAINING WALL CAVITY
(2) LAYERS OF BUILDING PAPER, LAP OVER
FLASHING
EXISTING WOOD SIDING
3X8 TREATED SILLPLATE OVER
CONTINUOS SILL GASKET
FOUNDATION WATER PROOF MEMBRANE
2" RIGID INSULATION
W/DRAINAGE CHANNELS
FOUNDATION DRAIN MAT
S.A.F. O/FOUNDATION WATER PROOF
MEMBRANE, LAP OVER DRAIN MAT, MIN 6"
METAL BASE FLASHING UNDER BUILDING
PAPER, LAP OVER S.A.F. 6" MIN.
LEAD PAINTED COPPER FLASHING AT BASE
LEVEL 1 -MAIN LEVEL F.F. NAVD
GYPCRETE & 2X2 NAILER
GRADE SLOPES AWAY FROM BUILDING MIN. 2%
BASEBOARD
1. GROW MEDIA AND PLANTING PER LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT
2. ROOT BARRIER PER MFR.
3. 1/2": DRAINAGE MAT
4. HOT APPLIED ASPHALTIC MEMBRANE PER MFR
5. COVERBOARD PER MFR
6. TAPARED EPS FOAM INSUL. - 2" MIN. - SLOPE PER PLANS
7. PLYWD., S.S.D.
8. CONCRETE DECK., S.S.D.
9. REINFORCING MESH
10. SHEAR STUD - WELDED ON BEAM TOP FLANGE
11. CONCRETE
12. GALVANIZED STEEL FLOOR DECKING
13. GIRDER
(E) WOOD SIDING
LEVEL 1 -MAIN LEVEL F.F. NAVD
GRADE SLOPES AWAY FROM BUILDING MIN. 2%
(E) BASEBOARD
FINISHED OPENING
BLOCKING FOR
DOOR JAMB
DRAINAGE PLANE ON (2) LAYERS OF GRADE
'D' BLDG. PAPER
(E) WOOD SIDING
PLYWOOD SHEATING S.S.D.
DOOR PER SCHEDULE
INT. FINISH
PER SCHEDULE
1X WOOD TRIM
GARAGE DOOR
TRACK AND ROLLERS
WEATHER STRIPPING
2X CASING FOR MOUNTING
DOOR HARDWARE AS REQ.
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date Issue
1 1/2" =
1'-0"BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:41:54 PM
A.6.00
DETAILS134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1 1/2" = 1'-0"1
FOUNDATION DETAIL @ HISTORIC
STRUCTURE
1 1/2" = 1'-0"2 GREEN ROOF DETAIL
1 1/2" = 1'-0"3 GARAGE DOOR JAMB DETAIL
EXISTING CONDITION
84
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date IssueBIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:41:54 PM
A.9.00
PERSPECTIVES (NO
LANDSCAPE)134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
85
10.31.2019These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law.350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO
81621
PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771
INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM
Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGNSCALE:
Plot Date
Drawn By
Checked By
Project No.
CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT:
CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN
INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT
APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT
WILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND
COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER
SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT.
NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL
SERVICE PER CONTRACT.
ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS
NOTED
CLIENT SIGNATURE:
___________________________
DATE OF APPROVAL:
__________________________
Date IssueBIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt4/20/2020 6:41:55 PM
A.9.01
PERSPECTIVES W/
LANDSCAPE134 EAST BLEEKERASPEN, CO19017
Author
Checker
1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL
86
SITEC1COVER SHEET134 EAST BLEEKER STREETASPEN, CO 81301ROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:OF 4 TOTAL PAGES134 EAST BLEEKER STREET
ASPEN, CO 81301 2020-05NOT FORJKERBG1 HPC SUBMITTAL 01.17.2020 JKE
2 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 03.24.2020 JKE
3 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 04.14.2020 JKE
4 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 04.17.2020 JKE
87
T1T2T3T4T5T6E EWG ELEC.METERWATERMETERXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STREETSIGNMETAL FENCEMETA
L
F
E
N
C
E
WO
O
D
F
E
N
C
EWOOD/METALFENCE TRANSITIONWOOD
F
E
N
C
E
WOO
D
F
E
N
C
E
MET
A
L
F
E
N
C
E
WOOD/METALFENCE TRANSITIONWOO
D
F
E
N
C
E
S 75°09'11" E 45.00'N 75°09'11" W 45.00'N 14°
5
0
'
4
9
"
E
1
0
0
.
0
0
'
S 14°5
0
'
4
9
"
W
1
0
0
.
0
0
'PSTONESIDEWALKPSTREETSIGNCOLOWERLEVELSTONEPATIOLOWE
R
L
E
V
E
L
WOOD DECKNORT
H
A
S
P
E
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
75.30'
R
-
O
-
W
ASPH
A
L
TEAST BLEEKER STREET74.78' R-O-WASPHALTTRASHENCLOSUREWOO
D
D
E
C
K
STONESIDEWALKF.F.7894.68'F.F.7895.78'F.F.7894.69'UPPE
R
L
E
V
E
L
DEC
K
UPPE
R
L
E
V
E
L
DEC
K
DRIVEWAYF.F.7894.80'R-6 BUILDING SETBACKLOT S AND EAST HALFOF LOT R, BLOCK 654,500 S.F.±TWO STORY WOODFRAME HOUSEWITH BASEMENT134 EAST BLEEKER STREETTWO STORY WOOD FRAMEHOUSE WITH GARAGESTREETSIGNPF.F.7895.66'RIDGE7918.8'RIDGE7919.9'RIDGE7916.3'RIDGE7916.2'RIDGE7920.1'RIDGE7918.78'RIDGE7918.9'RIDGE7918.83'10'
10'5'R-6 B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
5'R-6 B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
KR-6 BUILDING SETBACK#5 REBAR & CAP FOUNDL.S. #ILLEGIBLE#5 REBAR FOUNDBEARS S66°16'31"W 1.92'GASMETER#5 REBAR FOUNDBELOW GROUND#5 REBAR &CAP FOUNDL.S. #ILLEGIBLETBM EL=7894.95'STONE PATIOC.O.A. GPSMONUMENT #3C.O.A. GPSMONUMENT #7F.F.7895.66'RIDGE7916.2'ALLEY BLOCK 6520.69' R-O-WGRAVELW1/2 LOT RCANTILEVERTELE.PED. (TYP.)SEWERCLEANOUTCONC
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
RCONCRETE CURB & GUTTERS89°26'01"W2452.65'S17°13'51"W2226.65'CHIMNEY7921.6'CHIMNEY7921.6'CHIMNEY7919.2'ADJOI
N
E
R
H
O
U
S
E
CATVPED. (TYP.)TELEPHONE (TYP.)CABLE TV (TYP.)GASLINE (TYP.)ELECTRIC(TYP.)WAT
E
R
L
I
N
E
GRAV
E
L
DRIV
E
W
A
YWINDOWWELL
CONCRETE SIDEWALK7894.6'7894.9'7895.0'7895.3'7894.9'7894.7'7894.6'7894.9'7895.4'7895.0'7895.2'7894.1'C2EXISTING CONDITIONSROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:OF 4 TOTAL PAGES134 EAST BLEEKER STREET
ASPEN, CO 81301 2020-05NOT FORJKERBG1 HPC SUBMITTAL 01.17.2020 JKE
2 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 03.24.2020 JKE
3 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 04.14.2020 JKE
4 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 04.17.2020 JKE
88
C3BASINS AND DRAINAGEROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:OF 4 TOTAL PAGES134 EAST BLEEKER STREET
ASPEN, CO 81301 2020-05NOT FORJKERBG1 HPC SUBMITTAL 01.17.2020 JKE
2 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 03.24.2020 JKE
3 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 04.14.2020 JKE
4 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 04.17.2020 JKE
89
C4GRADING AND UTILITIESROARING FORK ENGINEERING
592 HIGHWAY 133
CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623
PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:OF 4 TOTAL PAGES134 EAST BLEEKER STREET
ASPEN, CO 81301 2020-05NOT FORJKERBG1 HPC SUBMITTAL 01.17.2020 JKE
2 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 03.24.2020 JKE
3 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 04.14.2020 JKE
4 UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL 04.17.2020 JKE
90
CTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W W789578957895
7895789578952%2%CDATE#DESCRIPTIONISSUE DATE:SHEET NUMBERREVIEWED:PROJECT NUMBER:DRAWN:1REVISIONS6271234567ABCDE134 EAST BLEEKER ST.
Aspen, COC O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C.F89123456789W W W . D E S I G N W O R K S H O P . C O MDESIGN WORKSHOPLandscape Architecture · Land PlanningUrban Design · Tourism PlanningAsheville · Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · DubaiHouston · Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles120 East Main Street(970) 925-8354(970) 920-1387Aspen, Colorado 81611HL/JSMAApril 20, 2020LX-01HPCSUBMISSIONNORTH0ORIGINAL SCALE:510201"=10'-00"N. AS
P
E
N
S
T
.E. BLEEKER ST.BUILDING SETBACKBUILDING SETBACKPROPERTY LINE
LANDSCAPEPLANCONCRETELEGENDMATERIALRETAINING WALLTURFPLANTINGPERENNIAL BED 1Shrub no greater than 36"GROUNDCOVERLILAC 6 - 8'COTTONWOOD TREETURF2 NEW STREET TREES (COTTONWOOD)WALK
W
A
Y
42" WOODEN FENCEWINDOWWELL
EXISTING 36" DBH SILVER MAPLETERR
A
C
E
TURF
PROPERTY LINESAND SET STONE PAVERWINDOWWELLPRELIMINARY PLANTING LIST ABBR.BOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEPA-3Populus angustifoliaNarrowleaf Cottonwood3"-calAS SHOWN2MS-3Malus Spring SnowSpring Snow Crabapple 3"-calAS SHOWN1SHRUBSSG-5Syringa hyacinthifloraWhite Lilac 5 gal.36" O.C.8RA-5Rhus aromatica Grow-Low Sumac 5 gal.16" O.C. 43SF-5Spiraea froebeliiFroebell Spiraea 5 gal.30" O.C. 53SPACINGCount SIZETREESLIGHTING LEGENDDESCRIPTIONQTY.SYMBOLWALL SCONCE291
ELEVATION FENCE
AXON FENCE
Wood Picket
Black Finish
3'-6"1.5"
PICKET
1.5"
GAP
DESIGNWORKSHOP
Comment:
Comment text...Drawn/Checked Proj. Num.Date Sheet Scale
OF
134 Bleeker St.
Client / Location
Sheet Description
JS 6271 04/17/2020 00 00 1/2"= 1'-00"
92
REGULAR MEETING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITY APRIL 22, 2020
Chairperson Greenwood opened the meeting at 4:30 p.m.
Commissioners in attendance: Gretchen Greenwood, Nora Berko
Roger Moyer, Jeffrey Halferty, Scott Kendrick, Sheri Sanzone
Commissioners not in attendance: Kara Thompson, Bob Blaich
Staff present:
Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer
Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner
Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney
Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Moyer motioned to approve the minutes of April 8th, Ms.
Sanzone seconded. All in Favor, Motion carried.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: None
CONFLICTS: Ms. Berko and Ms. Sanzone stated that they both have a conflict with 134 E.
Bleeker.
STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Bryan stated that there was a memo and resolution attached to the
HPC packets outlining Code of Conduct. Ms. Bryan stated that this was not in response to
anything that happened with HPC however with another board. Ms. Bryan said that this was an
outline of rules and conduct that both the board and public must follow. Ms. Bryan stated that
there wasn’t anything controversial in this resolution but can answer any question one might
have.
Ms. Greenwood asked if everyone took the time to read the resolution.
Ms. Sanzone asked if HPC should hold board members to this standard as well.
Ms. Bryan stated in a way we already do. She further explained how it was written it can be
applied to public and commissioners.
Mr. Moyer motioned to approve code of conduct resolution Ms. Berko seconded. Roll Call Vote
Ms. Greenwood, YES, Ms. Berko, YES, Mr. Halferty, YES, Mr. Moyer, YES, all in favor
motion carries.
Note Ms. Simons internet went down and HPC had to go out of order on the agenda until Ms.
Simon could rejoin.
CERTIFICATES OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: Ms. Yoon stated that a Certificate of No
Negative Effect was issued for 419 E. Hyman Avenue to replace all non-historic windows for the
residential unit on the second floor.
CALL UPS: Ms. Yoon stated that 125 W. Main St. did not get called up.
93
REGULAR MEETING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITY APRIL 22, 2020
Ms. Berko and Ms. Sanzone left the meeting.
NEW BUSINESS: 134 East Bleeker, Minor Development Review, Relocation, and Setback
Variations. Representative Sara Adams from BendonAdams
Ms. Adams stated that the project that was last presented was much bigger in scope and she took
HPC comments to heart and now has a revised project. Ms. Adams reviewed the history of the
historic cabin and barn. Ms. Adams pointed out that there was a large remodel in the 90s and all
the siding was removed from the barn and cabin. Ms. Adams further explained that there was a
curb cut and direct access to the garage from Aspen St. Ms. Adams stated that the new plan is a
minor HP review, and would include landscape touch ups, replacement of nonhistorical fence,
addition of trees on Aspen St., adding of sidewalks. Ms. Adams stated that there will be an
update to the no historic porch that faces Aspen St. Ms. Adams stated that the asphalt roof will
be replaced with wood shingles. Ms. Adams said that they are required to remove the curb cut
and replace the current garage door with windows. Ms. Adams stated that they were able to
create two onsite parking spaces. Ms. Adams stated that they will be keeping the walkways the
same however providing new hardscape. Ms. Adams showed the main entrance walkway being
slightly moved from the dripline of the silver maple tree. Ms. Adams stated that the secondary
walkway from Aspen St. will be skinner and detached from the patio. Ms. Adams showed the
flower beds and vegetation being pulled away from the building. Ms. Adams stated that the fence
is not original referencing photos. Ms. Adams points out that part of the fence does not meet
code and is more of a privacy fence. Ms. Adams proposed the removal of both fences and
replaces them with white picket fence. Ms. Adams recommended replacing the light fixture on
the front main entrance and secondary entrance with a gooseneck fixture Ms. Adams showed the
proposed elevation changes from each side. Ms. Adams stated the only thing happening to the
landmark are minor repairs. Ms. Adams showed the alley view elevation change and pointed out
in the new proposed plan the garage door now is twenty-one inches long. Ms. Adams explained
with extra inches given to the garage, a car could parallel park with more ease. Ms. Adams
pointed out that HPC has the new renderings in their packets for references.
STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Yoon pointed out that this project has gone from a major to a
minor review. Ms. Yoon stated that there is relocation being triggered due to the under pinning
under the historic cabin. Ms. Yoon stated that the guidelines are very specific in making the
primary walkway the true primary walkway and maintained as such. Ms. Yoon stated that staff
was concerned with the secondary walkway, she further explains that the applicant has address
this concern by making that path more narrow and detached. Ms. Yoon stated that staff was
concerned about the landscaping and vegetation to close to the historic building. Ms. Yoon
pointed out that the applicant addressed this by removing the shrubs closest to the historic home.
Ms. Yoon stated that the existing fence is not historic and the revised fence proposal meets the
design guidelines. Ms. Yoon stated that the light fixture detail is a new and staff would like to
further discuss appropriate scale as a condition for staff and monitor. Ms. Yoon stated that the
two new windows on the east facing side of the barn addition need to be distinguishable from the
historic windows as a feature of its own time. Ms. Yoon stated that staff recommends HPC
further discuss the details pertaining to the garage door and if possible, reduce the length of the
94
REGULAR MEETING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITY APRIL 22, 2020
door to reveal the corners of the structure. Ms. Yoon outlined the conditions that are attached that
staff would like to see.
Mr. Moyer asked how old is the iron fence and what is staff asking for with the garage.
Ms. Yoon stated that staff is not sure how old the fence is but it is not original to the site.
Mr. Moyer asked when was the house relocated to the current site.
Ms. Yoon stated it was relocated in the 1960s.
Christoff stated the garage is determined by a larger car turning radius. He pointed out that the
door tracks that point inward take up a few inches.
Mr. Kendrick stated that he is in support of the garage parking being fully utilized. He asked if
anyone has done a mockup of the garage with a real car to see how tight it can be and if the door
itself will be matching the siding.
Ms. Yoon stated the garage door will match the siding.
Ms. Greenwood asked why they don’t have to meet the residential design standards.
Ms. Yoon stated that all historic land properties are exempt from residential design standards.
Mr. Halferty asked how does the garage door open.
Christoff stated that it opens overhead five panel.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Ms. Yoon stated that three letters were sent in. Ms. Yoon summarized each letter.
Community Church support of changes that have been made.
Denise Dryers does not have further abjections but had comments related to the construction
management plan and other topics related to Engineering.
Howey Mallery echoes support in parking on site, but objects to the removal of the existing
fence.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
Ms. Greenwood stated that this is a really good project and commended the applicants for their
hard work. Ms. Greenwood said that the architect has handled the garage door beautifully. Ms.
Greenwood stated that she is favor this project with conditions and add lighting for staff and
monitor approval.
Mr. Moyer stated that he is ok with the conditions. Mr. Moyer added imagine if you were
walking in the west end and you see the iron fence, you will know this house is a historic. Mr.
95
REGULAR MEETING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITY APRIL 22, 2020
Moyer stated that he is adamantly opposes the white picket fence. Mr. Moyer asked if it is
possible to remove the frame from garage door to make it flush.
Mr. Halferty stated support moving this project forward. Mr. Halferty stated that he agrees with
Mr. Moyer about the fence. Mr. Halferty said he would like to see staff and monitor.
Mr. Kendrick stated that he is in favor of revised staff comments.
Ms. Greenwood stated that a new fence is appropriate and needed. Also, an iron fence is not
historically appropriate for a miner’s cabin.
Ms. Yoon requested that HPC add a new condition requesting a financial insurance of $30,000
for the historic home.
Mr. Moyer asked if there is any way they could deny the picket fence.
Ms. Yoon stated that there is nothing in the guidelines saying we can say they have to keep the
iron fence since it is not historic to the site.
MOTION: Mr. Halferty motioned to approve resolution #11 with conditions attached, Mr.
Kendrick seconded. Roll Call Vote: Ms. Greenwood, YES; Mr. Halferty, YES; Mr. Kendrick,
YES; Mr. Moyer, YES. All in favor motion carries.
Mr. Halferty will be the monitor.
ANNUAL AWARDS: Ms. Simon presented the annual HPC award nominees and categories.
The commissioners agreed to review offline and send Ms. Simon their picks. Presentation of
winners will be held first in person city council meeting.
Ms. Simon announced that there will be no meeting May 13th.
Mr. Moyer moved to adjourn Mr. Kendrick seconded, ALL in favor, Motion carried.
96
HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020
Page 1 of 4
RESOLUTION #11, SERIES OF 2020
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
GRANTING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, RELOCATION, AND SETBACK
VARIATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 134 EAST BLEEKER, LOT S AND THE
EAST ½ OF LOT R, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO
PARCEL ID: 2737-073-15-002
WHEREAS, the applicant, Otis Real Estate Holdings, LLC, c/o Good Property Company,
represented by BendonAdams, has requested HPC approval for Minor Development,
Relocation and Setback Variations for the property located at 134 East Bleeker, Lot S and the
East ½ of Lot R, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. As a historic landmark, the
site is exempt from Residential Design Standards review; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure
shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a
designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been
submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the
procedures established for their review;” and
WHEREAS, for Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff
analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s
conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section
26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may
approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional
information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and
WHEREAS, for approval of Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen
Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and
WHEREAS, for approval of Setback Variations, the application shall meet the requirements of
Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.C, Setback Variations; and
WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for
compliance with the applicable review standards and recommends restudy; and
WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on April 22, 2020. HPC considered the application,
the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review
standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0.
97
HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020
Page 2 of 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That HPC hereby approves Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback Variations for 134 East
Bleeker, Lot S and the East ½ of Lot R, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO as follows:
Section 1: Minor Development Review, Relocation, and Setback Variations.
HPC hereby approves Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback Variations with the with the
following conditions:
1. The following setback variations are approved for the existing historic secondary
“barn” structure:
• 8’-4” rear yard setback reduction above and below grade
• 3’-3” east side yard setback reduction above and below grade
2. Provide detailed information regarding vents and flues, gutters and snow stops, to be
reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit submission.
3. Design the lightwell curb height to be 6” or less in height.
4. Work closely with relevant City Departments regarding work in the dripline of trees,
particularly the location of the waterline and sidewalks.
5. Review exterior light fixtures, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor.
6. Provide a financial assurance of $30,000 for the historic house until the basement
construction is complete. The financial security is to be provided with the building
permit application.
Section 2: Material Representations
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic
Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan
development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless
amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority.
Section 3: Existing Litigation
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 4: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions thereof.
98
HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020
Page 3 of 4
Section 5: Vested Rights
The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan
vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However,
any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in
the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to
properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180
days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said
vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of
Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific
development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right.
No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to
obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of
Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan
and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in
the following form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan,
and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the
Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes,
pertaining to the following described property: 134 E. Bleeker
Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and
approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City
of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval.
The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the
period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the
date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section
26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution
and the Aspen Home Rule Charter.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 22nd day of April, 2020.
Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content:
_________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________
Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Gretchen Greenwood, Chair
99
HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020
Page 4 of 4
ATTEST:
_________________________________________________________________
Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk
100
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council
THROUGH: Phillip Supino, Community Development Director
FROM: Sarah Yoon, Preservation Planner; Community Development
MEMO DATE: May 4, 2020
MEETING DATE: May 12, 2020
RE: Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020; 920 East Hyman Avenue, Establishment of
Transferable Development Rights (TDR)
Applicant:
Larian, LLC
Representative:
Zone 4 Architects, LLC
Location:
920 E. Hyman Ave.;
Legally described as Lot N, Block
32, City of Aspen, County of
Pitkin, State of Colorado.
PID# 2737-182-06-005.
Current Zoning & Use:
RMF – Residential Multi-Family;
Single-family home
Summary: The owner of 920 E.
Hyman proposes to convert
unused floor area into one
Transferable Development Right
(TDR)
Staff Recommendation: Staff
recommends City Council approve
the establishment of one TDR, on
first reading
Vicinity Map – Aerial Image
920 E. Hyman Avenue
920
101
Page 2 of 3
Establishment of TDR
920 E. Hyman Avenue
REQUEST OF COUNCIL: The Applicant is requesting the following approval from City Council.
• Transferable Development Rights (Section 26.535) for the establishment of one TDR,
representing remaining residential development allowed on this historic parcel. The Historic
Preservation Commission (HPC) is a recommending body and Aspen City Council is the final
review authority.
SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND: As a historically designated landmark, the historic preservation
benefit to sever and sell unused development rights from the parcel in the form of Transferable
Development Rights (TDRs) is available. TDRs are calculated in increments of 250 sf of floor area.
The applicant proposes to remove the remaining residential development rights left on the property in
the form of one Transferable Development Right (TDR).
Background
920 E. Hyman is a designed landmark on a 3,000 sf lot in the RMF zone district. This single-family
residence is a one-story miner’s cabin with an existing non-historic addition to the rear of the property.
According to the floor area calculations provided in the application, one TDR may be established from
this site. All calculations must be verified by Zoning prior to the issuance of TDR certificates.
• Lot Size = 3,000 square feet
• Maximum Allowed Floor Area = 2,400 square feet
• Proposed Floor Area = 2,149.66 square feet
The remaining floor area that may be converted into a TDR equals 250.34 square feet (2,400 sf –
2,149.66 sf = 250.34 sf). The applicant requests approval for one TDR, which will consume all but
0.34 square feet of allowed development rights on the site.
HPC Meeting Summary
The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) met on January 22, 2020 to discuss the application for
Minor Development, Relocation, Setback Variations and Transferrable Development Rights (TDRs).
HPC voted unanimously (6-0) in support of the design proposal and recommended in favor of
establishing one TDR. See Exhibit B – HPC meeting minutes for more details.
DISCUSSION: The standard of review for the establishment of TDRs is in Section 26.535.070 of the
Land Use Code. The applicant demonstrates the existence of unused development rights of two
hundred fifty square feet of floor area on the historic property. The establishment of one TDR will not
create and/or increase any non-conformities, and the applicant has provided all necessary documents
including a draft deed restriction as part of the application. Staff finds that all applicable criteria for
establishing TDRs are met. (See Exhibit A for review criteria and staff findings.)
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
102
Page 3 of 3
Establishment of TDR
920 E. Hyman Avenue
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff and the HPC Recommendation
Staff and the HPC recommends approval of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020 on First Reading and
setting the public hearing for June 6, 2020.
Recommended Motion
“I move to approve Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020 and setting Seconding Reading for June 6, 2020.”
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________.
EXHIBITS:
A – Review Criteria & Staff Findings
B – HPC Meeting Minutes from January 22, 2020
C – Land Use Application
103
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020
920 East Hyman Avenue
Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. 6
(SERIES OF 2020)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF ONE TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHT FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 920 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, LOT N, BLOCK 32, CITY
AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
PARCEL ID: 2737-182-06-005
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the
applicant, Larian LLC, for the property located at 920 East Hyman Avenue, Lot N, Block 32,
City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, requesting approval for the following:
• Transferable Development Right (TDR) - Section 26.535 for the establishment of one (1)
TDR, representing the remaining residential development allowed on this historic parcel.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department reviewed the proposed
application, found that the review standards were met, and recommended in favor of establishing
one (1) TDRs for this site; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the application on January
22, 2020, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Department were
heard by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC), and the Commission recommended in
favor of the establishment of one (1) TDR through Resolution #3, Series of 2020, by a vote of six
to zero (6 – 0).
WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under
the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered
the recommendations of the Community Development Director and the Historic Preservation
Commission; and,
WHEREAS, City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all the
applicable development standards; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the
promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Transferable Development Rights (TDR)
Pursuant to the findings set forth above, the City Council does hereby authorize the creation of one
(1) TDRs from the 920 East Hyman Avenue with the following conditions:
104
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020
920 East Hyman Avenue
Page 2 of 3
1. Commencing with the severing of the first TDR from the property, the maximum floor area
for the lot shall be 2,400 square feet minus 250 square feet for each TDR Certificate issued.
2. Upon satisfaction of all requirements, the City and the applicant shall establish a date on
which the respective Historic TDR Certificates shall be validated and issued by the City and
a deed restriction on the property shall be accepted by the City and filed with the Pitkin
County Clerk and Recorder. The property owner may decide when and if, as warranted by
the TDR market, the development rights will be converted into certificates and sold.
3. On the mutually agreed upon date, the Mayor of the City of Aspen shall execute and deliver
the applicable number of Historic TDR Certificates on the property owner and the property
owner shall execute and deliver a deed restriction lessening the available development right
of the Sending Site by 250 square feet per TDR together with the appropriate fee for
recording the deed restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office.
4. All calculations shall be verified by The City prior to the issuance of Historic TDR
Certificates.
Section 2: Existing Litigation
This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 3: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
Section 4: Vested Rights
The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested
for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any
failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the
forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly
record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the
effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property
rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void
permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the
creation of a vested property right.
No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain
a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a
newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice
advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a
vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and
the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use
105
Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020
920 East Hyman Avenue
Page 3 of 3
Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the
following described properties: 920 East Hyman Avenue.
Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals
required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen
provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval.
The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the
period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of
publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A).
The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen
Home Rule Charter.
Section 5:
A duly noticed public hearing on this Ordinance was held on the 6th day of June, 2020 at 5:00 PM in
the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISED as provided by law, by the City
Council of the City of Aspen on the 12th day of May, 2020.
Attest: Approved as to content:
____________________________ ____________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this _____ day of __________, 2020.
Approved as to form: Approved as to content:
____________________________ ____________________________
James R. True, City Attorney Torre, Mayor
Attest:
____________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
106
Exhibit A – Review Criteria
Page 1 of 3
Exhibit A
Review Criteria & Staff Findings
26.535.070. Standard of Review – Establishment of TDRs
A historic TDR certificate may be established by the Mayor if the City Council, pursuant to
adoption of an ordinance, finds all the following standards met:
A. The sending site is a historic landmark on which the development of a single-family or
duplex residence is a permitted use, pursuant to Chapter 26.710, Zone Districts.
Properties on which such development is a conditional use shall not be eligible.
Staff Findings: The sending site, 920 E. Hyman, is in the RMF zone district which
allows for single-family residential use and is a designated historic landmark.
Staff finds this criterion is met.
B. It is demonstrated that the sending site has permitted unbuilt development rights, for
either a single-family or duplex home, equaling or exceeding two hundred and fifty
(250) square feet of floor area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates
requested.
Staff Findings: The maximum floor area for a single-family home on a 3,000 sf
lot is 2,400 sf. The applicant has provided floor area calculations indicating
250.34 sf of unbuilt floor area remains on this lot which results in one TDR. All
calculations will be verified prior to issuance. Staff finds this criterion is met.
C. It is demonstrated that the establishment of TDR certificates will not create a
nonconformity. In cases where a nonconformity already exists, the action shall not
increase the specific nonconformity.
Staff Findings: The establishment of a TDR certificate will not create or increase
a non-conformity on this site. Staff finds this criterion is met.
D. The analysis of unbuilt development right shall only include the actual built
development, any approved development order, the allowable development right
prescribed by zoning for a single-family or duplex residence, and shall not include the
potential of the sending site to gain floor area bonuses, exemptions or similar potential
development incentives. Properties in the MU Zone District which do not currently
contain a single-family home or duplex established prior to the adoption of Ordinance
#7, Series of 2005, shall be permitted to base the calculation of TDRs on 100% of the
allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 zone district. This is only for
the purpose of creating TDRs and does not permit the on-site development of 100%
of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 zone district. If the
additional 20% of allowable floor area exceeds 500 square feet, the applicant may not
request a floor area bonus from HPC at any time in the future. Any development order
to develop floor area, beyond that remaining legally connected to the property after
establishment of TDR Certificates, shall be considered null and void.
107
Exhibit A – Review Criteria
Page 2 of 3
Staff Findings: This property is in the RMF zone district where residential floor
area is 100% of the allowable floor area of an equivalent-sized lot located in the
R-6 zone district. The applicant is calculating 2,400 sf as the maximum allowable
floor area for this lot. Staff finds that this criterion is met.
E. The proposed deed restriction permanently restricts the maximum development of the
property (the sending site) to an allowable floor area not exceeding the allowance for
a single-family or duplex residence minus two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of
floor area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates established.
For properties with multiple or unlimited floor areas for certain types of allowed
uses, the maximum development of the property, independent of the established
property use, shall be the floor area of a single-family or duplex residence
(whichever is permitted) minus two hundred fifty (250) square feet of floor area
multiplies by the number of historic TDR certificates established.
The deed restriction shall not stipulate an absolute floor area, but shall stipulate a
square footage reduction from the allowable floor area for a single-family or duplex
residence, as may be amended from time to time. The sending site shall remain
eligible for certain floor area incentives and/or exemptions as may be authorized
by the City Land Use Code, as may be amended from time to time. The form of
the deed restriction shall be acceptable to the City Attorney.
Staff Findings: The applicant has provided a draft deed restriction in the
application, as required. TDR certificates are established in increments of 250
sf. All documents shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution.
Staff finds this criterion is met.
F. A real estate closing has been scheduled at which, upon satisfaction of all relevant
requirements, the City shall execute and deliver the applicable number of historic TDR
certificates to the sending site property owner and that property owner shall execute
and deliver a deed restriction lessening the available development right of the subject
property together with the appropriate fee for recording the deed restriction with the
County Clerk and Recorder's office.
Staff Findings: This is a mandatory process that the applicant must pursue.
Staff finds this criterion is met.
G. It shall be the responsibility of the sending site property owner to provide building plans
and a zoning analysis of the sending site to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director. Certain review fees may be required for the confirmation of
built floor area.
Staff Findings: The applicant has provided the needed plans and analysis to
review the application. The floor area calculations indicate that 250.34 sf of
unbuilt floor area remains on this lot. Final calculations shall be reviewed by
The City prior to the issuance of the TDR certificates. Staff finds this criterion
is met.
108
Exhibit A – Review Criteria
Page 3 of 3
H. The sale, assignment, conveyance or other transfer or change in ownership of
transferable development rights certificates shall be recorded in the real estate records
of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder and must be reported by the grantor to the
City of Aspen Community Development Department within five (5) days of such
transfer. The report of such transfer shall disclose the certificate number, the grantor,
the grantee and the total value of the consideration paid for the certificate. Failure to
timely or accurately report such transfer shall not render the transferable development
right certificate void.
Staff Findings: This is a mandatory process that the applicant must pursue.
Staff finds this criterion is met.
I. TDR certificates may be issued at the pace preferred by the property owner.
Staff Findings: n/a
J. City Council may find that the creation of TDRs is not the best preservation solution
for the affected historic resource and deny the application to create TDRs. HPC shall
provide Council with a recommendation.
Staff Findings: The applicant’s request to establish one TDR from this site has
been reviewed by staff and the HPC. A recommendation in favor of establishing
one TDR has been provided to City Council. City Council is the final authority
for granting TDRs.
109
4
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020
Ms. Greenwood asked if everyone is okay with the siding materials. She thinks it’s a better choice from
a color standpoint.
Ms. Thompson stated that she is happy with the materials. They look appropriate.
Mr. Halferty stated that he is also happy with the materials.
Mr. Moyer stated that he’s happy with the bamboo.
Ms. Sanzone stated that she finds that the landscape plan and the fence are compliant with the HPC
guidelines. She would support the design.
Ms. Greenwood stated that it is compliant with the guidelines. She wishes that most of the fence would
be 42-inches for the length of the historic resource. Since that’s not in their guidelines, she can’t really
ask the applicants to do it. She thinks it’s important. Little details like that make a difference in a
community when everyone wants to see the historic resource.
Mr. Halferty stated that he agrees with the landscape plan. What’s proposed is compliant with the HPC
guidelines. He echoed the same comment as Ms. Greenwood regarding being able to see the historic
resource.
Ms. Greenwood stated that applicants don’t always have to go with the guidelines. They should be
sensitive to all the effort that’s gone into restoring the historic resource. The right thing to do would be
to keep the fence low until it reaches the new addition. It’s not like it’s creating a whole lot of space.
STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon stated that there are a lot of people attending the meeting. She
encouraged the commissioners to speak closely into their microphones. She reminded everyone to
state their name when they speak for the benefit of the clerk producing minutes remotely from the
recording.
Ms. Simon stated that staff and several commissioners are going to be at the Colorado Preservation Inc.
conference next week from Wednesday to Friday.
CERTIFICATES OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None.
CALL UPS: None.
OLD BUSINESS: None.
NEW BUSINESS: 920 E Hyman Avenue – Minor Development, Relocation, Setback Variations, and TDR
Ms. Yoon introduced the project. 920 E Hyman is a 3,000 square foot lot, historically designated, has a
one-story miner’s cabin to the front of the property and it’s connected with an above-grade addition
that was approved by HPC back in 1999, so it doesn’t have the traditional connecting element that we
see today. Looking at the Sanborn Maps from 1904, it appears to be roughly in the same location. It
currently has a setback, which is approximately 22-feet from the property line in a district where 10-feet
is required. The site also has a number of large trees that are located towards the front of the property.
It is located in the RMF zone district. With this application, the applicant wishes to convert an existing
crawl-space into a full basement, add new lightwells, make some exterior material changes and
fenestration changes. The fenestration changes are concentrated on the above-grade addition, not the
historic resource.
110
5
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020
Ms. Yoon stated that the request for the relocation is needed because any work that requires
underpinning of the structure is considered relocation according to the design guidelines. No new
above-grade or structures are proposed. Nothing is essentially being moved. The applicant plans to
make modifications to the front walkway with this proposal. There is a step towards the front of the
property that is large, so they are going to make that modification there. In relation to stormwater
mitigation, they are proposing to use pervious walkway pavers. The applicant does need to work more
with the Engineering and Parks Departments to hone in on the requirements for drainage and
stormwater, but those are underway. The material that the applicant was providing this week related to
the pervious pavers is going to be a brick paver. In the process, staff recommends that the applicant try
to meet the Design Guideline 1.6. Currently, the existing walkway is not perpendicular. More
investigation into why that is is needed. It is staff’s recommendation to try and meet Guideline 1.6 as
this walkway is being restudied.
Ms. Yoon stated that it was represented in the drawings provided by the architects that footers are
already existing. Two new lightwells are abutting the historic resource towards the rear to provide
egress for the rooms on the sub-grade level. They are slightly larger than what is required by minimum
building code. The modifications to the size of the two existing lightwells are also proposed.
Ms. Yoon stated that fenestration changes are proposed on the north east west elevations of the non-
historic addition. No fenestration changes are proposed on the historic resource. The applicant also
included the addition of new downspouts along the east and west elevation. Staff did provide a
recommendation for additional re-study of where the downspouts are to be located.
Ms. Yoon stated that the applicant does plan to change the roofing material of the existing addition and
the historic resource. It was represented in the application that the historic resource would be restored
to cedar wood shingles. The addition would be changed to a standing seam metal roof. Staff does find
that both of these materials, and in combination with what is existing, meet the criteria and design
guidelines. Since the proposal does trigger relocation, new setback variations will be necessary to
memorialize the location of the existing historic resource, which is currently encroaching into the east
and west setbacks. Additionally, the lightwells are proposed in the setbacks and the applicant is asking
for setback variations for these features. Staff does find that the criteria for granting setback variations
are met with this request. In addition, the applicant is also requesting the establishment of one TDR.
Staff supports the establishment of the TDR that will reduce developable floor area on the site. It does
meet the criteria, as shown in the packet. It is important to note that the establishment of TDRs can
only be done by City Council. HPC is a recommending body for the TDRs. All floor area calculations
must be verified prior to the creating of the TDR certificates. Those all need to be considered.
Ms. Yoon stated that staff does recommend approval of the project. They ask that the applicant restudy
the walkway to be perpendicular if possible, utilizing the pavers and material that’s historically
appropriate. They should work with staff and monitor to find that balance. This is to be done before
the submission of building permit. Also the restudy of the downspouts, which are on the non-historic
addition. That final configuration to also be reviewed by staff and monitor. In the responses that the
applicant sent on Tuesday, they did provide a roof plan. It does show the dimensions and locations of
111
6
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020
new flues and vents. They also provided additional information about snow clips, so Condition Three
has been met and can be taken off. Staff ask that the lightwell curb heights be six inches or less to make
sure that it’s not too high. There was a request in the application related to the stained glass window.
Additional research and investigation of the materials themselves will be necessary. Staff encourages
the applicant to explore the stained glass that’s there to see if it is historic. It’s unclear at this moment.
Staff do not have enough documentation to support its removal. Working with all relevant City
departments regarding storm water mitigation and urban runoff management plans, the referral
agencies, the Engineering and Parks Departments did provide some comments indicating more
conversation needed related to the drainage and the stormwater mitigation. Those final plans are to be
reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit submission. The setback variations
are to be granted to memorialize the location of the historic resource. It also encompasses the
proposed lightwells. The setback variation applies to above and below grade. Staff is in support of the
establishment of one TDR with the finalized floor areas to be verified by the appropriate City
departments before its establishment. Nine is the financial assurance required for relocation.
Ms. Thompson asked if the rear yard setback needs to be reestablished or if that’s set from the old
ordinance.
Ms. Yoon stated that the rear yard setback is set from the old ordinance. There is no work being done in
that area. That one will remain as well as what was approved previously.
Ms. Sanzone asked if the application was submitted after the board required concepts about site
drainage.
Ms. Yoon stated that their guidelines ask for preliminary concepts. She believes that the applicant did
reach out to Engineering and had a preliminary discussion. Since then, staff referred it to the
Engineering Department. There’s been more discussion related to that.
Ms. Sanzone stated that she thought HPC clarified that it was a plan or some sort of drawing that would
be a part of the application that the Commission could review.
Ms. Simon stated that the applicant did provide that and their intention was to tear up the existing
sidewalk and use pervious pavers. Engineering had a change of opinion about the extent of mitigation,
which is why they are now less certain.
Ms. Greenwood asked if they need a rear-yard setback for excavation below-grade.
Ms. Yoon stated that they’re not doing any excavation on the rear. It’s all concentrated to the front
where the historic resource is.
Ms. Thompson stated that they are changing the size of the lightwells. She would anticipate the grading
around them changing. She thinks that that is important to look at, too.
112
7
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020
APPLICANT PRESETNATION: Mark Janion of B2 Builders introduced himself. He introduced Colleen
Loughin and Bill Pollock of Zone 4 Architects. He stated that the applicants are meeting with the
necessary departments at the City next week to hash out drainage and parks issues that Ms. Simon
mentioned. Regarding the excavation, there’s already an existing basement under the entire addition
and about half the historic asset. The applicants are going to hand-dig out the remaining half, take the
dirt out. It’s already a full-height crawlspace. They are only taking out a small portion. The design from
the engineer goes straight down on the existing foundation, which is why they need the setback
variation. The original house was in the setback and they are just going straight down. They are not
going outside of the original perimeter.
Mr. Halferty asked if Jack discussed the underpinning and foundation extensions, regarding the
excavation.
Mr. Janion stated that it would be four-foot sections.
Mr. Halferty asked if it will all be dug from inside the structure.
Mr. Janion stated that it will be.
Mr. Kendrick asked about the excavation on the window wells. It appears that, on the east side, it goes
past the footprint of the house. On that side of the house, it’s very tight with the adjoining property.
Mr. Janion stated that they would hand-dig that as well and try to work with the engineer to see if they
can come up with a detail to not go over the property. Everything that they do will be on their property.
Mr. Kendrick asked if the window well goes past their property line.
Mr. Janion stated that it does not.
Ms. Sanzone asked if the soil will be wheelbarrowed to the back of the property.
Mr. Janion replied that it will be.
Ms. Sanzone asked how the applicants propose to remove the soil and get it through the area with the
existing tree.
Mr. Janion stated that they can cover the window well and take it over to the driveway in the back.
Ms. Sanzone asked how they plan to do that with the tree in between.
Mr. Janion stated that they will do it with buckets and carry it around.
Ms. Sanzone asked if they have talked with the Parks Department about how they might accomplish
work in that area.
113
8
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020
Mr. Janion stated that they have not.
Ms. Sanzone stated that she would like them to include that as a part of their conversation.
Ms. Greenwood asked if the applicants are in agreement with what the City is asking them for.
Mr. Janion replied that they are.
Mr. Moyer asked if the applicants foresee any problems with various pipes protruding through the roof,
as related to staff Condition Three.
Mr. Janion stated that it’s not an issue.
Mr. Moyer asked if they know whether the stained glass window is historic or not.
Mr. Janion stated that he does not know. The oldest photos they could find have the window.
Ms. Thompson asked why the lightwells behind the historic bump out past the existing wall instead of
just continuing straight back.
Mr. Pollock stated that it’s related to constructability. They also do need some room. They could bring
it in a bit, but for code reasons they need to be minimum 3x3.
Mr. Janion stated that they will bring it in as small as they can.
Mr. Pollock stated that it was recommended that way by the structural engineer.
Ms. Sanzone asked if the large spruce tree that was added back in the site plan is to remain.
Mr. Janion stated that it is to remain.
Ms. Sanzone asked how the front path will be both snow melted and pervious.
Mr. Janion stated that it will be accomplished with sand and drilled insulation to let the water through
the insulation and then the insulation protects from heating the ground.
Ms. Sanzone asked if the reason that’s proposed to be pervious is to accomplish the additional drainage
requirements or if that’s only related to the walkway. She asked if that includes any impacts with the
other sitework including the two new window wells.
Mr. Janion stated that the roof currently just sheds. There’s a dry well that’s in the right of way that
Engineering doesn’t want them to keep. So they are proposing taking their drainage through that
walkway.
114
9
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020
Ms. Sanzone asked if it’s a new pipe connection under the walkway. She asked if the drywall would be
in the right of way or in the street.
Mr. Janion stated that it would just be the rock bed below the pervious pavers.
Ms. Sanzone asked what they think the excavation depth is going to be.
Mr. Janion stated that he thinks it was seven by three feet.
Ms. Sanzone asked if protections for trees that might come up in their discussions with Parks would alter
the design.
Mr. Janion stated that trying to get the walkway straight is impacted by the trees, so they are going to
work with Parks, Engineering, and Ms. Simon to figure out what the final alignment looks like.
Ms. Sanzone asked if they are married to the width of the walk that they’re showing in the plans.
Mr. Janion stated that they are not.
Ms. Sanzone stated that she would suggest narrowing that to help reduce the impact on the trees. It
may be that they can do deeper versus wider to accomplish the drainage requirements.
Mr. Janion stated that they would be fine with that.
Ms. Sanzone asked if they are confident that they will be able to protect the trees on the neighbors’
property during their work.
Mr. Janion stated that they are.
Ms. Sanzone asked if that will be discussed with the Parks Department.
Mr. Janion stated that that is.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Ms. Yoon stated that staff did receive public comment on the project that was sent
out to the commissioners.
COMMISSIONER DELIBERATION: Ms. Greenwood stated that there are conditions in the application for
this project to move forward.
Mr. Moyer stated that he is in concurrence with staff’s recommendation.
115
10
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020
Mr. Halferty stated that he concurs with the recommendations of staff and the guidelines are met.
They’ve thought about the constructability and conservation of the trees. He could support this
application as is.
Mr. Kendrick stated that he concurs with staff recommendations. The applicant has done a good job
addressing the concerns.
Ms. Thompson stated that she agrees.
Ms. Sanzone asked if they are coming back for a Final.
Ms. Greenwood stated that this is a minor development, so this is their only hearing.
Ms. Sanzone asked if the irrigation control box is in a yard box.
Mr. Janion stated that it is.
Ms. Sanzone asked what will happen with the path lights if they straighten the path.
Mr. Janion stated that they will do whatever staff, the board, and the guidelines recommend.
Ms. Sanzone stated that, in general, the guidelines wouldn’t support this marching of lights to the front
door. She suggested eliminating those.
Ms. Greenwood stated that they have a lot to work out with the stormwater and landscaping. It might
be a simple situation where a monitor could work with staff on it. They are more landscaping issues
than they are building issues.
Ms. Sanzone stated that, with that, she would support the application and staff’s recommendation.
Ms. Greenwood stated that she does not see any problem with this application.
Mr. Kendrick motioned to approve Resolution Three as written. Mr. Moyer seconded.
Role Call Vote: Ms. Greenwood, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes; Mr. Kendrick, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Mr.
Moyer, yes; Ms. Sanzone.
Ms. Sanzone volunteered to be the monitor for this project.
620 Gillespie Avenue and 845 Meadows Rd, Aspen Institute – Historic Designation and Benefits,
Conceptual Major Development and Commercial Design, Growth Management, Planned
Development, Special Review, Transportation Impact and Trash Storage
116
October 29, 2019
HAND DELIVERY
Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer
City of Aspen Community Development Department
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: 920 East Hyman Ave.
Pre-Application Summary
Dear Amy:
On behalf of B2 Builders (Applicant), Zone 4 Architects would like to present an application to
consider a Relocation review, Variation review, Minor Development review, and Transferable
Development Right review for the purposes of remodeling an existing home located at 920 East
Hyman Avenue. The property is currently a landmarked site. For this application, the Applicant is
proposing to excavate a basement below the existing historic cottage, re-roof the existing roofs,
add a new window well, new storm windows, and to sever one TDR from the property.
Per the pre-application summary, this application is subject to the following provis ions of the City
of Aspen Land Use Code. Individual responses to these sections will follow.
▪ 26.304: Common Development Review Procedures
▪ 26.415.070.C: Development involving designated historic property, or property within a
_________________historic district, Certificate of Appropriateness for a minor development
▪ 26.415.090: Relocation of designated historic properties
▪ 26.415.110.C: Variations
▪ 26.535: Transferable Development Rights
▪ 26.575.020.E: Measuring Setbacks
▪ 26.710.090: Residential Multi-Family (RMF)
Responses to Review Criteria:
▪ 26.304: Common Development Review Procedures
▪ Pre-application conference between the applicant and Amy Simon, of the
Community Development Department, occurred to discuss the project scope and
goals.
117
▪ The applicant intends to comply with all requirements under section 26.304
including the following:
• Application fees will be paid upon submittal of each step of the application;
• Compliance with the City of Aspen Charter and the Land Use Code;
• Application will undergo review of applicable Decision-making bodies
▪ 26.415.070.C: Development involving designated historic property, or property within a
historic district, Certificate of Appropriateness for a minor development
1. The review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for minor
development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development Director that
the proposed project constitutes a minor development. Minor development work includes:
a) Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase of the floor area of the structure
is two hundred and fifty (250) square feet or less or
▪ 26.415.070.C.1.a: The proposed project reduces the existing FAR from 2,174.40
square feet to 2,119.78 square feet.
b) Alterations to a building façade, windows, doors, roof planes or material, exterior wall
materials, dormer porch, exterior staircase, balcony or ornamental trim when three (3) or
fewer elements are affected and the work does not qualify for a certificate of no negative
effect or
▪ 26.415.070.C.1.b: The historic cottage is largely unaltered in the proposed remodel.
One of the existing entry doors will be removed and replaced with a window in a
similar style as the existing cottage windows. The existing roof will not be altered,
and existing exterior siding is to remain. The work does not qualify for a certificate of
no negative effect.
c) Erection or installation of a combination or multiples of awning, canopies, mechanical
equipment, fencing, signs, accessory features and other attachments to designated properties
such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no
negative effect or
▪ 26.415.070.C.1.c: No awnings, canopies, mechanical equipment, fencing, signs, or
accessory features and other attachments to the designated property are proposed.
d) Alterations that are made to non-historic portions of a designated historic property that do
not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect or
▪ 26.415.070.C.1.d: The non-historic main house will have new windows which do not
qualify the proposal from a certificate of no negative effect.
e) The erection of street furniture, signs, public art and other visible improvements within
designated historic districts of a magnitude or in numbers such that the cumulative impact
does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect.
▪ 26.415.070.C.1.e: No street furniture, signs, public art and other visible
improvements are proposed.
2. An application for minor development shall include the following:
a) The general application information required in Section 26.304.030.
▪ 26.415.070.C.2.a: The application will comply with code section 26.304.030.
b) Scaled elevations and/or drawings of the proposed work and its relationship to the
designated historic buildings, structures, sites and features within its vicinity.
▪ 26.415.070.C.2.b: The application includes ¼”:1’-0” elevations and plans depicting
its relationship to the designated historic cottage.
c) An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the
development.
▪ 26.415.070.C.2.c: Elevations and renderings depict the exterior materials and
finishes to be used. The existing cottage finish materials are not proposed to
change from the existing condition. The existing siding is proposed to be repainted.
d) Photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location, extent and design
of proposed work.
▪ 26.415.070.C.2.d: Photograph exhibits show the lot for redevelopment as well as
the surrounding neighborhood context. A site plan and vicinity map locate the
property in the larger context of downtown Aspen.
e) Verification that the proposal complies with Chapter 26.410, Residential design standards
or a written request for a variance from any standard that is not being met.
118
▪ 26.415.070.C.2.e: The proposed development is not changing or modifying any of
the existing exterior except for a couple of window replacements. Due to the nature
of the work, this application is exempt from RDS per code section 26.410.010.C.1.
▪ 26.415.090: Relocation of designated historic properties
A. Application. An application for relocation shall include:
1. The general application information required in Section 26.304.030
▪ 26.415.090.A.1: The application complies with the information required in section
26.304.030.
2. A written description and/or graphic illustrations of the building, structure or object proposed
for relocation.
▪ 26.415.090.A.2: Refer to drawing set for graphic illustrations of the existing building
proposed for minor development.
3. A written explanation of the type of relocation requested (temporary, on-site or off-site) and
justification for the need for relocation.
▪ 26.415.090.A.3: The minor development proposes to excavate under the existing
historic cottage’s existing crawlspace. This proposed basement will require
structural support and underpinning to conduct the work necessary to excavate
under the historic cottage.
4. A written report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the building,
structure or object, its ability to withstand the physical move and its rehabilitation needs, once
relocated.
▪ 26.415.090.A.4: Refer to the Structural Engineer’s report regarding the integrity of
the structure and ability to withstand the excavation work.
5. A conceptual plan for the receiving site providing preliminary information on the property
boundaries, existing improvements and site characteristics and the associated planned
improvements.
▪ 26.415.090.A.5: Not applicable to this application.
6. If the applicant does not own the receiving site, proof from the site's property owner of the
willingness to accept the relocated building, structure or object.
▪ 26.415.090.A.6: Not applicable to this application.
7. Evidence that the applicant has or is seeking the necessary approvals to place the building on
the identified receiving site. If the site is outside of the city limits, verification that the building
will be preserved on its new site through a formal action of the other jurisdiction or a
preservation easement.
▪ 26.415.090.A.7: Not applicable to this application.
8. Evidence of the financial ability to undertake the safe relocation, preservation and repair of the
building, structure or object; site preparation and construction of necessary infrastructure
through the posting of bonds or other financial measures deemed appropriate.
▪ 26.415.090.A.8: Refer to the Applicant’s documentation outlining their financial
means for the proposed development, preservation of the historic cottage during
excavation, and site preparation.
9. Supplementary materials to provide an understanding of the larger context for the relocated
property and its impact on adjacent properties, the neighborhood or streetscape.
▪ 26.415.090.A.9: Not applicable to this application as the work is not relocating the
property.
26.415.090.C.Standards for the relocation of designated properties. Relocation for a building,
structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards:
1. It is considered a noncontributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the
character of the historic district; or
▪ 26.415.090.C.1: The proposed relocation is to excavate under the existing
crawlspace under the historic cottage. This will not have any effect on the character
of the historic district as the work is entirely subgrade.
2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located
and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the Historic District or property; or
▪ 26.415.090.C.2: The proposed relocation is to excavate under the existing
crawlspace under the historic cottage. This will not have any effect on the character
of the historic district as the work is entirely subgrade.
3. The owner has obtained a certificate of economic hardship; or
119
▪ 26.415.090.C.3: Not applicable.
4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the
character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the
integrity of the Historic District in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural
or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and
▪ 26.415.090.C.4: The proposed relocation is to excavate under the existing
crawlspace under the historic cottage. This will not have any effect on the character
of the historic district as the work is entirely subgrade, and the relationship to adjacent
properties is maintained.
Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met:
1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical
impacts of relocation;
▪ 26.415.090.C.1: Refer to the Structural Engineer’s letter stating the integrity of the
structure and proposed construction methods.
2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and
▪ 26.415.090.C.2: The relocation is temporary while the basement is excavated. There
is no receiving site as the historic cottage is remaining in the existing location.
3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation
of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security.
▪ 26.415.090.C.3: Refer to the submission drawings showing the existing and proposed
plans, structural engineer’s letter, and owner letter stating financial ability to undertake
the safe relocation.
▪ 26.415.110.C: Variations
Variations. Dimensional variations are allowed for projects involving designated properties to create
development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property or district than what
would be required by the underlying zoning's dimensional standards. 1. The HPC may grant
variations of the Land Use Code for designated properties to allow:
a) Development in the side, rear and front setbacks;
▪ 26.415.110.C.1.a: A new egress window well is proposed in a side yard setback.
The existing property has window wells in the side yard setbacks, and a portion of
the historic cottage is 4.3’ within the east side yard setback and 3.4’ within the west
side yard setback. The existing addition attached to the cottage conforms to front,
year, and side yard setbacks.
b) Development that does not meet the minimum distance requirements between buildings;
▪ 26.415.110.C.1.b: No development is proposed that doesn’t meet the minimum
distance requirements between buildings.
c) Up to five percent (5%) additional site coverage;
▪ 26.415.110.C.1.c: No additional site coverage is proposed.
d) Less public amenity than required for the on-site relocation of commercial historic properties.
▪ 26.415.110.C.1.d: The temporary relocation does not require any public amenity as
it is not a commercial historic property.
2. In granting a variation, the HPC must make a finding that such a variation:
a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or
▪ 26.415.110.C.2.a: The proposed variation is in-line with existing features and
character on the site. The variance would allow for an expansion under the existing
crawlspace of the cottage, which is currently non-conforming to side-yard setbacks.
Additionally, the Applicant’s request to sever a TDR from the property would
enhance the historic lot by limiting developable FAR on the site.
b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character
of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district.
▪ 26.415.110.C.2.b: The proposed variations do not have an adverse impact on the
existing historic character of the property as the work is entirely subgrade.
▪ 26.535: Transferable Development Rights
120
Review criteria for establishment of a historic transferable development right
A historic TDR certificate may be established by the Mayor if the City Council, pursuant to adoption of an
ordinance, finds all the following standards met.
A. The sending site is a historic landmark on which the development of a single-family or duplex
residence is a permitted use, pursuant to Chapter 26.710, Zone Districts. Properties on which
such development is a conditional use shall not be eligible.
▪ The sending site is a historic landmark on which a single-family residence is a
permitted use per the R/MF zone district.
B. It is demonstrated that the sending site has permitted unbuilt development rights, for either a
single-family or duplex home, equaling or exceeding two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of
floor area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates requested.
▪ The Applicant requests to sever one TDR from the site for the single-family home,
equaling or exceeding 250 s.f. of floor area x 1 TDR.
C. It is demonstrated that the establishment of TDR certificates will not create a nonconformity. In
cases where a nonconformity already exists, the action shall not increase the specific
nonconformity.
▪ The severance of one TDR will not create a nonconformity. This will bring the
existing property into further compliance with allowable FAR on the site.
D. The analysis of unbuilt development right shall only include the actual built development, any
approved development order, the allowable development right prescribed by zoning for a single -
family or duplex residence and shall not include the potential of the sending site to gain floor
area bonuses, exemptions or similar potential development incentives. Properties in the MU
Zone District which do not currently contain a single -family home or duplex established prior to
the adoption of Ordinance #7, Series of 2005, shall be permitted to base the calculation of TDRs
on 100% of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 zone district. This is
only for the purpose of creating TDRs and does not permit the on -site development of 100% of
the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 zone district. If the additional 20%
of allowable floor area exceeds 500 square feet, the applicant may not request a floor area bonus
from HPC at any time in the future.
▪ The Applicant requests to sever one TDR applies to the existing built development
and minor below-grade expansion under the existing historic cottage.
E. Any development order to develop floor area, beyond that remaining legally connected to the
property after establishment of TDR Certificates, shall be considered null and void.
▪ The severance of one TDR will lower the allowable FAR on the site to be less than
the current condition.
F. The proposed deed restriction permanently restricts the maximum development of the property
(the sending site) to an allowable floor area not exceeding the allowance for a single -family or
duplex residence minus two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplied by the
number of historic TDR certificates established.
▪ The severance of one TDR will lower the allowable FAR on the site to be less than
the current condition. Additionally, the proposed FAR will be greater than 250 s.f.
under the allowable FAR on the site, which on this property is 2,400 s.f.
1. For properties with multiple or unlimited floor areas for certain types of allowed uses, the maximum
development of the property, independent of the established property use, shall be the floor area of
a single-family or duplex residence (whichever is permitted) minus two hundred fifty (250) square
feet of floor area multiplies by the number of historic TDR certificates established.
2. The deed restriction shall not stipulate an absolute floor area, but shall stipulate a square footage
reduction from the allowable floor area for a single-family or duplex residence, as may be amended
from time to time. The sending site shall remain eligible for certain floor area incentives and/or
exemptions as may be authorized by the City Land Use Code, as may be amended from t ime to
time. The form of the deed restriction shall be acceptable to the City Attorney.
G. A real estate closing has been scheduled at which, upon satisfaction of all relevant requirements,
the City shall execute and deliver the applicable number of historic TDR certificates to the
sending site property owner and that property owner shall execute and deliver a deed restriction
lessening the available development right of the subject property together with the appropriate
fee for recording the deed restriction with the County Clerk and Recorder's office.
H. It shall be the responsibility of the sending site property owner to provide building plans and a
zoning analysis of the sending site to the satisfaction of the Community Development
Director. Certain review fees may be required for the confirmation of built floor area.
121
▪ The Applicant has included building plans and a zoning analysis as part of the Land
Use Application.
I. The sale, assignment, conveyance or other transfer or change in ownership of transferable
development rights certificates shall be recorded in the real estate records of the Pitkin County
Clerk and Recorder and must be reported by the grantor to the City of Aspen Community
Development Department within five (5) days of such transfer. The report of such transfer shall
disclose the certificate number, the grantor, the grantee and the total value o f the consideration
paid for the certificate. Failure to timely or accurately report such transfer shall not render the
transferable development right certificate void.
J. TDR certificates may be issued at the pace preferred by the property owner.
K. City Council may find that the creation of TDRs is not the best preservation solution for the
affected historic resource and deny the application to create TDRs. HPC shall provide Council
with a recommendation.
▪ 26.575.020.E: Measuring Setbacks
5. Allowed Projections into Setbacks. Setback areas shall be unobstructed above and below
ground except for the following allowed projections:
e) Foundation footers, soil nails or below-grade tiebacks, and similar improvements necessary
for the structural integrity of a building or other structures.
▪ The property has established setbacks as determined by the City of Aspen Land
Use Code. The existing historic cottage encroaches on both the 5’-0” side yard
setbacks. In order to excavate under the existing cottage crawlspace, foundation
footers will be in the 5’-0” side yard setbacks.
h) The minimum projection necessary to accommodate light wells and exterior basement
stairwells as required by adopted Building or Fire Codes as long as these features are
entirely recessed behind the vertical plane established by the portion of the building
façade(s) closest to any Street(s).
▪ The proposed egress wells will be the minimum projection necessary to meet the
Building and Fire Codes. The historic cottage facades screen these window wells
from East Hyman Avenue.
▪ 26.710.090: Residential Multi-Family (RMF)
B. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted as of right in the Residential Multi-Family
(RMF) Zone District:
1. Detached residential dwelling.
2. Two (2) detached residential dwellings.
3. Duplex dwelling.
4. Multi-family dwellings.
5. Home occupations.
6. Accessory buildings and uses.
7. Dormitory.
8. Accessory dwelling units and carriage houses meeting the provisions of Chapter 26.520.
9. For historic landmark properties: bed and breakfast.
10. Vacation Rentals. Pursuant to Section 26.575.220
▪ 26.710.090.B.1: The proposed application is permitted as of right in the RMF Zone
District as a detached residential dwelling.
C. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the
Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District, subject to the standards and procedures
established in Chapter 26.425:
1. Arts, cultural and civic uses.
2. Academic uses.
3. Recreational uses.
4. Group home.
5. Child care center.
▪ 26.710.090.C: This is not applicable to the application.
D. Dimensional requirements. The following dimensional requirements shall apply to all
permitted and conditional uses in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District:
1. Minimum Gross Lot Area (square feet): six thousand (6,000). For lots created by
Paragraph 26.480.030.A.4, Historic landmark lot split: three thousand (3,000).
▪ 26.710.090.D.1: The historic landmark lot is 3,000 s.f. +/-.
122
2. Minimum Net Lot Area per dwelling unit (square feet):
a. Detached residential dwelling: four thousand five hundred (4,500). For historic
landmark properties: three thousand (3,000).
▪ 26.710.090.D.2.a.: The historic landmark lot is 3,000 s.f. +/- with a detached
residential dwelling.
b. Duplex dwelling unit: four thousand five hundred (4,500). For historic landmark
properties: three thousand (3,000).
c. Multi-family dwellings: No requirement.
d. Bed and breakfast: No requirement.
3. Minimum lot width (feet): sixty (60). For lots created by Paragraph 26.480.030.A.4,
Historic landmark lot split: thirty (30).
▪ 26.710.090.D.3.: Refer to the Survey which shows the lot is 30’-0” in width pursuant
to 26.480.030.A.4.
4. Minimum front yard setback (feet):
a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: Same as R-6 Zone District.
▪ 26.710.090.D.4.a.: Refer to the Survey which shows a front yard setback of 10’-0”
which meets R-6 Zone District requirements for principal buildings.
b. Multi-family: five (5).
5. Minimum side yard setback (feet):
a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: same as R-6 Zone District.
▪ 26.710.090.D.5.a.: Refer to the Survey which shows a side yard setback of 5’-0”
which meets R-6 Zone District requirements for principal buildings. The west side
yard setback is in conformance, but the east side yard setback has a portion of the
existing historic cottage within the setback.
b. Multi-family: five (5).
6. Minimum rear yard setback (feet):
a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: same as R-6 Zone District.
▪ 26.710.090.D.6.a.: Refer to the Survey which shows a rear yard setback of 5’-0”
which meets R-6 Zone District requirements for the portion of a principal building
used solely as a garage.
b. Multi-family: five (5).
7. Maximum height (according to density) (feet):
a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: same as R-6 Zone District.
▪ 26.710.090.D.7.a.: The existing and proposed development meet the requirements
of the maximum height limit of 25’-0”. Reference elevation drawings in submittal
package.
b. Multi-family – parcel density less than one (1) unit per one thousand five hundred
(1,500) square feet of Gross Lot Area: twenty-five (25).
c. Multi-family – parcel density equal to or greater than one (1) unit per one thousand
five hundred (1,500) square feet of Gross Lot Area: thirty-two (32).
8. Minimum distance between buildings on the lot (feet):
a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: same as R-6 Zone District.
▪ 26.710.090.D.8.a.: This is not applicable to the lot as there is only one building.
b. Multi-family: No requirement. (Building and Fire Codes may apply.)
9. Pedestrian amenity space: Pursuant to Section 26.575.030.
▪ 26.710.090.D.9.: The adjacent parcels are multi-family developments and don’t
have business operations adjacent to/on the same parcel as the outdoor space. The
existing public right-of-way is not proposed to be altered.
10. Floor area ratio (FAR). This Paragraph applies to each type of use according to density
and applies to conforming and nonconforming lots of record:
a. Existing detached residential and duplex dwellings: one hundred percent (100%)
of the allowable floor area of an equivalent-sized lot located in the R-6 Zone District.
(See Section 26.710.040, R-6 Zone District.) City historic transferable development rights
shall not permit additional floor area for detached residential and duplex dwellings.
▪ 26.710.090.D.10.a.: The proposed minor development is an existing detached
residential dwelling which is entitled to 100% of the allowable FAR of an equivalent
sized lot located in the R-6 Zone District. This lot is entitled to 2,400 square feet of
FAR. The historic landmark is a legally non-conforming structure, and the FAR and
dimensional improvements that are proposed are below-grade. While floor area is
123
being added below-grade, there is a net reduction in FAR. This is reducing the non-
conforming situation because of the FAR reduction.
b. New or replacement after demolition detached residential and duplex dwellings:
eighty percent (80%) of the allowable floor area of an equivalent-sized lot located
in the R-6 Zone District. (See Section 26.710.040, R-6 Zone District.) City historic
transferable development rights shall not permit additional floor area for detached
residential and duplex dwellings.
▪ 26.710.090.D.10.b.: Not applicable.
c. Multi-family – parcel density of less than one (1) unit per one thousand five hundred
(1,500) square feet of Gross Lot Area: 0.75:1.
▪ 26.710.090.D.10.c.: Not applicable.
d. Multi-family – parcel density equal to or greater than one (1) unit per one thousand
five hundred (1,500) square feet of Gross Lot Area: 1.25:1.
▪ 26.710.090.D.10.d.: Not applicable.
e. Multi-family – parcel density equal to or greater than one (1) unit per seven hundred
fifty (750) square feet of Gross Lot Area: 1.5:1.
▪ 26.710.090.D.10.e.: Not applicable.
11. Maximum multi-family unit size (square feet): For properties in the Aspen infill area,
two thousand (2,000) square feet of net livable area. For properties outside the Aspen
infill area, two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of net livable area.
▪ 26.710.090.D.11.: Not applicable.
a. The property owner may increase individual multi-family unit size by extinguishing
historic transferable development right certificates ("certificate" or "certificates"),
subject to the following:
1) The transfer ratio is five hundred (500) square feet of net livable area for each
certificate that is purchased.
2) The additional square footage accrued may be applied to multiple units.
However, the maximum individual unit size attainable by transferring
development rights is two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of net
livable area for properties within the Aspen infill area and three thousand (3,000)
square feet of net livable area for properties outside the Aspen infill area (i.e.,
no more than five hundred [500] additional square feet may be applied per unit).
3) This incentive applies only to individual unit size. Transferring development
rights does not allow an increase in the floor area ratio (FAR) of the lot.
▪ 26.710.090.D.11.a.: This is not applicable as the property is a single-family lot.
Thank you for your consideration,
Bill Pollock
Zone 4 Architects
Cc: File
Applicant
124
1
DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A
HISTORIC TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHT
PURSUANT TO ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE #___ , SERIES OF 20__
THIS DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _____
day of ______________, 20__, by_________________, (hereinafter referred to as “Owner”),
whose address is___________________________________, and The City of Aspen, a body
politic and corporate pursuant to its Home-Rule Charter and the Constitution of the State of
Colorado, acting through its City Council, (hereinafter the “City”);
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Owner owns real property more specifically described as 920 E Hyman
Ave. Subdivision: EAST ASPEN ADDITION Block: 32 Lot: N; Parcel ID 2737-182-06-005,
Pitkin County, Colorado, (hereinafter referred to as “Real Property”), which Real Property is
designated as a Historic Site, as such are defined in the City of Aspen Land Use Code (“City
Code”); and
WHEREAS, Owner has submitted an affidavit, duly notarized, in compliance with
Section 26.535.090.A.2 of the City Code, and supplied the necessary application materials
identified in Section 26.535.090 showing compliance with the criteria set forth in Section
26.535.070 of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, The Community Development Department has reviewed Owner’s
application according to the review standards identified in 26.535.070 of the City Code, and has
recommended approval of the application and the establishment of one (1) approved Historic
TDR Certificates as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance #____, Series of 20___ (the “Ordinance”) was
approved on ___(date)__________, establishing the above referenced Historic TDR Certificates,
and requiring that a Deed Restriction be recorded in real property records of Pitkin County,
designating the Real Property as a Sending Site and permanently restricting the development of
the Real Property (the Sending Site) to an allowable Floor Area not exceeding the allowance for
a single-family residence or duplex if allowed, minus two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of
Floor Area multiplied by the number of Historic TDR Certificates established; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the establishment of one (1) Historic TDR Certificates
pursuant to the Ordinance and City Code, Owner agrees to restrict the Real Property as set forth
herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations contained
herein, Owner and the City hereby covenant and agree as follows:
1. Development of the Real Property (the Sending Site) is hereby permanently
restricted to an allowable Floor Area not exceeding the allowance for a single-
125
2
family residence or duplex as otherwise permitted by the City Code on the Real
Property, minus any deductions resulting from previous issuance of TDR
certificate(s) and minus 250 square feet, that being two hundred fifty (250) square
feet of Floor Area multiplied by the one (1) Historic TDR Certificate hereby
established.
2. In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the City Code and the
Ordinance, the City shall cause the issuance of one (1) Historic TDR Certificate,
executed by the Mayor, allowing the transfer of development rights to a Receiver
Site to be determined pursuant to the City Code. This Historic TDR Certificate
may be sold, assigned, transferred, or conveyed. Transfer of title shall be
evidenced by an assignment of ownership on the actual certificate document.
Upon transfer, the new owner may request the City re-issue the certificate
acknowledging the new owner. Reissuance shall not require adoption of a new
ordinance. The market for such Historic TDR Certificates shall remain
unrestricted and the City shall not prescribe or guarantee the monetary value of
any Historic TDR Certificates.
3. This deed restriction shall not be construed to stipulate an absolute Floor Area on
the Real Property, but only a square footage reduction from the allowable Floor
Area, as that allowable Floor Area may be amended from time to time.
4. The Real Property (Sending Site) shall remain eligible for Floor Area incentives
and/or exemptions as may be authorized by the City Code, as it may be amended
from time to time.
5. This restriction may be modified only in a writing signed by both the Owner and
the City.
6. Unless modified as stated above, this Agreement shall constitute a covenant
running with the Real Property as a burden thereon for the benefit of, and shall be
specifically enforceable by, the City Council of the City of Aspen by any
appropriate legal action including, but not limited to, injunction or abatement.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES]
126
3
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument on the date and
year above first written.
OWNER:
By:___________________________
(property owner)
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of
______________, 20___, by ___________
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:___________________
_____________________________
Notary Public
127
4
APPROVAL OF CITY ATTORNEY
By:___________________________
James R. True, City Attorney
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO
a body politic and corporate pursuant to
its Home-Rule Charter and the Constitution of the State of Colorado
By:____________________________ Date:______________
Torre, Mayor
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of
_________________, 20__, by_____________, as Mayor of the City of Aspen, Colorado.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:___________________
_____________________________
Notary Public
128
129
130
City of Aspen Community Development Department
Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet
City of Aspen|130 S. Galena Street.| (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016
ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application
PROJECT:
Name:
Location:
(Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property)
Parcel ID # (REQUIRED)___________________________________________________________
Applicant:
Name:
Address:
Phone #: _______________________Fax#:___________________E-mail:_______________________________________________
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name:
Address:
Phone #: _______________________Fax#:___________________E-mail:________________________________________________
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
Historic Designation
Certificate of No Negative Effect
Certificate of Appropriateness
-Minor Historic Development
-Major Historic Development
-Conceptual Historic Development
-Final Historic Development
-Substantial Amendment
Relocation (temporary, on
or off-site)
Demolition (total demolition)
Historic Landmark Lot Split
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
920 E. HYMAN AVE
2737-182-06-005
920 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611
LOT N, BLOCK 32
ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS, LLC.
432a E. HYMAN AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611
970.429.8470 BPOLLOCK@ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM
X
X
An existing landmarked site with historic cottage connected to a single-family home.
Excavation below existing historic cottage crawlspace for a basement, continued use as single-family
home, exterior materials are to remain, new storm windows, a new egress window well, replacement of
roofing.
Joel Schenkman
Larian, LLC
ian@obppartners.com
11301 S. Dixie Highway Unit 566418
Miami, FL 33256
305.463.9838
131
City of Aspen Community Development Department
Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet
City of Aspen|130 S. Galena Street.| (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016
General Information
Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This
information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that
may be involved.
YES NO
Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions,
new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration?
Does the work you are planning include interior work, including remodeling,
rehabilitation, or restoration?
Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time?
In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative
Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places
Property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits?
If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in
Conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed
on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential
properties are not.)
If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for
Historical Preservation?
Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use:
Rehabilitation Loan Fund Conservation Easement Program Dimensional Variances
Increased Density Historic Landmark Lot Split Waiver of Park Dedication Fees
Conditional Uses Tax Credits
Exemption from Growth Management Quota System
X
X
X
X
132
City of Aspen Community Development Department
Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet
City of Aspen|130 S. Galena Street.| (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016
ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form
(Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.)
Project:
Applicant:
Project
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
(For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high
water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the
Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing:__________Proposed:_________________
Number of residential units: Existing:__________Proposed:_________________
Proposed % of demolition: __________
DIMENSIONS: (write N/A where no requirement exists in the zone district)
Floor Area:
Height
Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________
Principal Bldg.: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________
Accessory Bldg.: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________
On-Site parking: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
% Site coverage: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
% Open Space: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
Front Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
Rear Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
Combined Front/Rear:
Indicate N, S, E, W
Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
Side Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
Side Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
Combined Sides: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
Distance between
buildings:
Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________
Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued:
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): ______________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
920 E. Hyman Ave.
920 E. Hyman Ave.
Aspen, CO 81611
Joel Schenkman Larian, LLC.
R-MF
+/- 3,000 S.F.
+/- 3,000 S.F.
N/A N/A
1 1
2,174 2,400 2,119.78
25'
N/A N/A
10'22.7'22.7'
5'5'5'
15'27.7'27.7'
S.
N.
E.
W.
N/A N/A
2 car garage 2 car garage
25'
none
none
none
0.7'0.7'5'
5'
10'
1.6'1.6'
2.3'2.3'
5'
The existing historic cottage encroaches on both the East and West side yard setbacks by 4.3'
and 3.4' respectively. The remaining home complies with the side yard setbacks.
The Applicant requests a variance for the
side yard setbacks to accommodate the existing aforementioned non-conformities. A variance is
needed to allow for excavation under the footprint of the existing cottage's crawlspace.
+/-24'-5 3/4"+/-24'-5 3/4"
+/- 47%+/- 47%
+/- 53%+/- 53%
+/- 2.14%
133
134
1924
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
DATE: October 11, 2019
PLANNER: Amy Simon, amy.simon@cityofaspen.com
PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS: 920 E. Hyman Avenue
REPRESENTATIVE: bill.pollock@zone4architects.com
DESCRIPTION: A new property owner proposes the following scope of work for this landmarked site:
Relocation review to excavate a basement below the historic cottage (where there is currently only a crawl
space), Variation review for sideyard setback variations for the new basement, Minor Development review
for modifications to the site and cottage (including re-roofing, new storm windows, changes to the front
doors, a new lightwell and possibly a new front walk), and Transferable Development Right review to sever
one TDR from the property.
This review (with the exception of the TDR) is a one-step hearing, meaning that all details of the proposal will
be presented to HPC in one application. Staff will review the project and make a recommendation to HPC,
based on the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. HPC will make a decision to approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the proposal.
Regarding the TDR, HPC will make a recommendation to City Council, who will determine whether criteria
have been met.
Below are links to relevant documents and a list of information needed to submit an application.
RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS:
Section Number Section Title
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.415.070.C Development involving designated historic property or property
within a historic district, Certificate of Appropriateness for a minor
development
26.415.090 Relocation of designated historic properties
26.415.110.C Variations
26.535 Transferable Development Rights
26.575.020.E Measuring Setbacks
26.710.090 Residential Multi-Family (RMF)
For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below:
Historic Preservation Design Guidelines
Historic Preservation Land Use Application Packet
135
Land Use Code
REVIEW BY:
• Staff for Application Completeness and Recommendations
• Historic Preservation Commission and City Council for decisions
PUBLIC HEARING: Yes, at HPC and Council
PLANNING FEES: $1,300 Deposit for 4 hours of staff time (additional/lesser hours will be
billed/refunded at a rate of $325/hr.)
REFERRAL FEES: No, however staff will seek referral comments from the Building Department,
Zoning and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or considerations.
TOTAL DEPOSIT: $1,300
APPLICATION CHECKLIST – These items should first be submitted in a paper copy.
Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.
Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).
Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur,
consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an
ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado,
listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements,
contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for
the Development Application.
Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states
the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of
the applicant.
HOA Compliance form (Attached to Application)
A site plan and survey showing property boundaries, the location and orientation of existing and
proposed improvements and predominant site characteristics.
A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how
the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development
application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property.
Scaled elevations and/or drawings of the proposed work and its relationship to the designated
buildings, structures, sites and features within its vicinity.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
136
A floor area analysis of the existing and proposed development.
An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development.
Photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location, extend and design of
proposed work.
A written explanation of the type of relocation requested (temporary, on -site or off-site) and
justification for the need for relocation.
A written report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the building,
structure or object, its ability to withstand the physical move and its rehabilitation needs, once
relocated.
Evidence of the financial ability to undertake the safe relocation, preservation and repair of the
building, structure or object; site preparation and construction of necessary infrastructure through
the posting of bonds or other financial measures deemed appropriate.
A notarized affidavit from the sending site property owner signifying acknowledgment of the
following:
o A deed restriction will permanently encumber the sending site and restrict that property's
development rights to below that allowed by right by zoning according to the number of
historic TDR certificates established from that sending site.
o For each certificate of development right issued by the City for the particular sending site,
that property shall be allowed two hundred and fifty (250) square feet less of floor area, as
permitted according to the property's zoning, as amended.
o The sending site property owner shall have n o authority over the manner in which the
certificate of development right is used by subsequent owners of the historic TDR
certificate.
Once the application is deemed complete by staff, the applicant/applicant’s representative will receive an
e-mail requesting submission of an electronic copy of the complete application and the deposit. Once the
deposit is received, the case will be assigned to a planner and the land use review will begin.
During review of the case, additional items may be requested.
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on
current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may
not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
137
138
139
140
141
X
X
COEGGIWN 14°50'4
9
"
E
1
0
0
.
0
0
'S 75°09'11" E 30.00'S 14°50'4
9
"
W
1
0
0
.
0
0
'N 75°09'11" W 30.00'9.50'12.00'14.90'3.20'48.10'20.20'48.50'3.60'23.70'15.00'1.6'22.7'0.7'5'#5 REBAR & REDPLASTIC CAP L.S.#25947#5 REBAR & YELLOWPLASTIC CAP L.S.#15710 BEARSN76°08'24"W 0.38'#5 REBAR & YELLOWPLASTIC CAP L.S.#15710 BEARSS68°01'17"W 0.28'BASIS O
F
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
S
CONCRETEDRIVEWAYALLEY20.89' R-O-WASPHALT#5 REBAR & REDPLASTIC CAP L.S.#25947BOULDERRET. WALLCONCRETESIDEWALKCOVEREDWOODDECKIRRIGATIONCONTROL BOXFLAGST
O
N
E
W
A
L
K
ADJOINE
R
H
O
U
S
E
4.3'WINDO
W
W
E
L
L
WINDO
W
WELL
WINDO
W
WELL
GASMETERCONCRETEDRIVEWAYCONCRETEDRIVEWAYTIESTEPS5.1'WOOD D
E
C
K
TIEPLANTE
R
CLEAN
O
U
T
ELEC.METERWATERMETERGASMETERCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE CURB & GUTTEREAST HYMAN AVENUE74.80' R-O-WASPHALTBUILDING SETBACKPER REC. NO. 4278625'5'10'BUILDINGSETBACKLOT MBLOCK 32LOT OBLOCK 32LOT NBLOCK 323,000S.F.±2 STORY WOODFRAME HOUSEWITH BASEMENT920 E. HYMAN AVE.YARD EASEMENTPER BK 356 PG 116& PERMANENT PERPETUALEASEMENT PER BK 786 PG 6185'CONIFER12" 20'CONIFER18" 5'CONIFER16" 20'CONIFER10" 18'EAVEGUTTER0.1'0.5'0.3'0.6'NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTIONBASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRSTDISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT INTHIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THECERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.ByNO.DateProject NO.RevisionDrawn By:Checked By:Date:Computer File:P.O. Box 1746Rifle, CO 81650Phone (970) 625-1954Fax (970) 579-7150www.peaksurveyinginc.comSNWEPeak Surveying, Inc.Since 2007190631 OF 1ACHIM BUERKLINCITY OF ASPEN, COLORADOIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLATLOT N, BLOCK 32, EAST ASPEN ADD.920 E. HYMAN AVENUEJRNJRNSEPT. 04, 2019063.DWG1 09/09/19UPDATE SURVEYJRNIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLATLOT N, BLOCK 32, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPENCITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONLOT N, BLOCK 32, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, CITY OFASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.NOTES:1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDINGSETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN INTHE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES AS AGENT FORCHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 0706046-C DATED EFFECTIVEAUGUST 16, 2019.2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS SEPTEMBER 03, 2019.3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S14°50'49"W BETWEEN THENORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT N, BLOCK 32, A #5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. #25947FOUND IN PLACE AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT N, BLOCK 32, A #5 REBAR & REDPLASTIC CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE.4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 2005 ASRECEPTION NO. 516269, THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PREPARED BY JOHNSONLONGFELLOW AND ASSOC., DATED OCTOBER 02, 1978, RECORDED IN BOOK 760 AT PAGE 532 INTHE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLATPREPARED BY SEXTON SURVEY COMPANY, DATED OCTOBER 07, 1998, JOB NO. 98137 ANDCORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.6) ACCORDING TO RECEPTION NO.'S 428448 AND 433966 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS DESIGNATEDAS A HISTORIC LANDMARK.7) THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED R/MF ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF ASPEN WEBSITE. BUILDINGSETBACKS ARE AS FOLLOWS: FRONT=10' PRINCIPAL BUILDING AND 15' FOR ACCESSORYBUILDING; REAR=10' PRINCIPAL BUILDING AND 5' FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING; SIDES=5'.BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ANYPLANNING, DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION.NESW0306090120150180210240270300330P e ak Surveying, Inc.0101020405IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENTI, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO LARIAN, LLC., A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,ACHIM BUERKLIN AND TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES AS AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLEINSURANCE COMPANY, THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE,CORRECT AND COMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAIDOUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A GUARANTY ORWARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WASMADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME ORUNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON SEPTEMBER 03, 2019; THAT, IN THE PREPARATION OF THISIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, I RELIED UPON TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES AS AGENT FORCHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 0706046-C DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST16, 2019; THAT THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS,EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY ORON THE REAL PROPERTY AND MATTERS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT CAPABLEOF BEING SHOWN ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT IS IN ACCORDANCE OF ANIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9). DATED: SEPTEMBER 09, 2019 BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC.COLO
R
A
DO LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR
JASO
N
R. NEIL37935142
920 EAST HYMAN AVE
11/4/2019HPC APPLICATION | SCALE: 1/4" = 1'
VICINITY MAP
143
DATE
Date:
Scale:
Drawn by:
REVISIONS
Z4A
WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM
50% PERMIT 12.12.19Z4A
PERMIT PRE
APP 01.21.20Z4A
PERMIT 03.04.20Z4A
Y:\Shared\Data\_Z4 Projects\1924 920 East Hyman\Model\920 E Hyman.plnBY
A101
3/4/2020Plotted On:
3/4/2020
AS NOTED
EXISTING FAR
CALCULATION
S
ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS IS NOT LIABLE OR RESPONSIBLE AT ANY TIME FOR ANY CHANGES TO THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION.c 2017 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS, LLC. THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED920 EAST HYMAN920 East Hyman AvenueAspen, CO 81611City of Aspen, Pitkin County<5'-6" (EXEMPT)
A
B
C Dwindow well window well
E
F
H
J
G
1,244.79 sq ft
BEDROOMBEDROOM
CRAWL
MECH
LAUNDRY
I
BATHROOM
W.I.C.
BATHROOM
+/-89'-3" LOWER LEVEL
99' BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL+/-98'-9 7/8" BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL
+/-97'-3" BO STRUCTURE GARAGE
425.72 sq ft160 sq ft
138.69 sq ft
325.63 sq ft
ABC
90.67 sq ftW
RD
DS
DS
1,041.84 sq ft
448.69 sq ft
HISTORIC
LIVING RM
HISTORIC
DININGPDR
2-CAR GARAGE
KITCHENDINING
ROOF
DECK
stair
175.54 sq ft
822.51 sq ft
DECK
MASTER
BEDROOM
BED #2
BATH #2W.I.C.
W.I.C.
MASTER
BATHROOM
EXPOSED WALL SURFACE AREAEXPOSED WALL SURFACE AREA
BURIED WALL AREA
FAR
GARAGE AREA
DECK/PORCH AREA
AREA LEGEND
+/-89'-3" LOWER LEVEL
99' BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL+/-98'-9 7/8" BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL
+/-97'-3" BO STRUCTURE GARAGE
1.24 sq ft 4.65 sq ft
66.82 sq ft
2.49 sq ft
35.8 sq ft
14.19 sq ft 1.79 sq ft
25.73 sq ft
203.77 sq ft106.83 sq ft31.84 sq ft
2.23 sq ft
DEFHGIJ
32.06 sq ft
Floor Area Calculations
Allowable Floor Area 2,400.00
No easements have been
calculated for reductions in
Net Lot Area. TBD
Existing Lower Level Wall Calculations
Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq.Ft.) Exposed Wall Area (Sq.Ft.)
A 425.72 0
B 160 0
C 464.56 138.69
D 34.29 2.23
E 71.47 4.65
F 38.29 2.49
G 27.52 1.79
H 217.95 14.19
I 108.07 1.24
J 31.84 0
Overall Wall Areas (Sq.Ft.) 1,579.71
Exposed Wall Areas (Sq.Ft.)165.28
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed/Total) 10.46%
Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,244.79
Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 130.24 1,244.79 X 17.51% = 218.0
Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84
Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84
Existing Garage Area Calculations
Garage at Main Level 448.69 (Actual Area)
Garage Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 99.35
(448.69-250 = 198.69)
(198.69 X %50 = 99.35
Existing Upper Level Floor Area Calculations
Upper Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 822.51
Upper Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 822.51
Existing Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations
Deck/Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 266.21
360 Exempt (2,400 X %15 =
360)
Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 0.00
Total Existing Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 130.24
Main Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84
Garage Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 99.35
Upper Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 822.51
Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 0.00
Total 2,093.94 -306.06
-306.06
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 LOWER LEVEL AREA PLAN
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4 LOWER LEVEL WALL AREAS
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 UPPER LEVEL AREA PLAN
5 AREA SUMMARY
144
DATE
Date:
Scale:
Drawn by:
REVISIONS
Z4A
WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM
50% PERMIT 12.12.19Z4A
PERMIT PRE
APP 01.21.20Z4A
PERMIT 03.04.20Z4A
Y:\Shared\Data\_Z4 Projects\1924 920 East Hyman\Model\920 E Hyman.plnBY
A102
3/4/2020Plotted On:
3/4/2020
AS NOTED
PROPOSED
FAR
CALCULATION
S
ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS IS NOT LIABLE OR RESPONSIBLE AT ANY TIME FOR ANY CHANGES TO THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION.c 2017 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS, LLC. THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED920 EAST HYMAN920 East Hyman AvenueAspen, CO 81611City of Aspen, Pitkin CountyA
B
C D
E
window well window well
F
G
H
I
J
1,583.58 sq ftMECH
LAUNDRY
BED 1
TV / MEDIA
BATH 1
BAR
POWDER BED 2
BED 3
BATH 2
BATH 3
+/-89'-3" LOWER LEVEL
99' BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL+/-98'-9 7/8" BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL
+/-97'-3" BO STRUCTURE GARAGE
19.22 sq ft
406.5 sq ft160 sq ft
107.89 sq ft
356.44 sq ft
BC A
90.67 sq ftW
RD
DS
DS
1,041.84 sq ft
448.69 sq ftGARAGE
KITCHEN
HISTORIC
PORCH
MUD
PDR
DINING
LIVING
PANTRY
stair
301
300
302
303
304
305
175.54 sq ft
820.83 sq ft
GUEST
BED
PRIMARY
BED
GUEST
BATHPRIMARY
BATH
PRIMARY
CLOSET
DECK
HALL
EXPOSED WALL SURFACE AREAEXPOSED WALL SURFACE AREA
BURIED WALL AREA
FAR
GARAGE AREA
DECK/PORCH AREA
AREA LEGEND
+/-89'-3" LOWER LEVEL
99' BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL+/-98'-9 7/8" BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL
+/-97'-3" BO STRUCTURE GARAGE
14.61 sq ft
209.86 sq ft
24.83 sq ft14.14 sq ft
178.75 sq ft
5.74 sq ft
57.93 sq ft
7.35 sq ft
194.56 sq ft
21.31 sq ft
10.53 sq ft
1.89 sq ft
DEFGHIJ
12.27 sq ft
27.14 sq ft
Floor Area Calculations
Allowable Floor Area 2,400.00
Proposed Lower Level Wall Calculations
Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq.Ft.) Exposed Wall Area (Sq.Ft.)
A 425.72 19.22
B 160 0
C 464.57 107.89
D 37.1 24.83
E 224.47 14.61
F 192.89 14.14
G 29.03 1.89
H 63.67 5.74
I 201.91 7.35
J 31.84 21.31
Overall Wall Areas (Sq.Ft.) 1,831.20
Exposed Wall Areas (Sq.Ft.)216.98
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed/Total) 11.85%
Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,583.58
Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 187.64 1,583.58 X 13.16% = 208.32
Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84
Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84
Proposed Garage Area Calculations
Garage at Main Level 448.69 (Actual Area)
Garage Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 99.35
(448.69-250 = 198.69)
(198.69 X %50 = 99.35
Proposed Upper Level Floor Area Calculations
Upper Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 820.83
Upper Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 820.83
Proposed Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations
Deck/Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 266.21
360 Exempt (2,400 X %15 =
360)
Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 187.64
Main Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84
Garage Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 99.35
Upper Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 820.83
Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 0.00
Total 2,149.66 -250.34
-250.34
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 LOWER LEVEL AREA PLAN
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4 LOWER LEVEL WALL AREAS
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 UPPER LEVEL AREA PLAN
5 AREA SUMMARY
145
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Sara Ott, City Manager
Pete Strecker, Finance Director
MEETING DATE: May 12, 2020
RE: First Reading – 2020 Spring Supplemental
Request of Council: Staff is requesting Council consideration of needed budgetary adjustments
to address a combination of events including: (1) the lapse of annual appropriations at the end
of 2019 for which there is still capital and operational project work to complete; (2) unforeseen
changes that have occurred since the original 2020 Budget was adopted in November last year;
and (3) technical actions to address internal transfers, one-time grant supported items, and
equipment replacement funding. In total, the Spring Supplemental requests an increase of
$42,066,758.
Previous Actions: Council adopted the original 2020 Budget in November 2019, when there
was a different economic environment than the present. With the COVID pandemic reaching
the mountain communities in early March and severely limited economic activity in the Valley
and beyond, City Council took emergency action and adopted two ordinances (Ord. #4 and #5,
Series 2020) to appropriate $6 million in relief and recovery funding. The Council also adopted
Resolution #34, Series 2020 to soften the immediate impact to the General Fund of carrying
$3.5 million of this $6 million relief and recovery package, allowing for an interfund advance from
the City’s Wheeler Opera House Fund with repayment terms for a 10 year period and at a rate
equal to the current Treasury rate for the same duration.
Summary and Background: Staff held a work session with Council on May 4, 2020 to walk
through the combined “routine” Spring Supplemental items as well as the impact of COVID on
both revenue expectations and recommended cost cutting measures proposed by the
Administration to limit the impact to the financial health of the organization. The attached
documents reflect the summarized Spring Supplemental package, separated by type of request.
Given that the Council already took action within Ordinances #4 and #5, those impacts have
been shown separately from the proposed supplemental request presented today, leaving a
revised supplemental request of $42,066,758.
To support the increased authority within the Spring Supplemental request, note the opening
balance change for 2020 equal to $89.3M and is predominately a reflection of the unspent
appropriation authority for 2019 capital projects that extended beyond the one fiscal year.
Additionally, it does also reflect 2019 revenue collections above initial conservative projections
when the budget was developed and includes savings from underspent operational budgets.
The proposed revised annual spending plan results in an ending fund balance across City funds
equal to $144.3M – this is greater than the original $127.4M anticipated and allows for some
additional buffer in the event that current actions are not sufficient in this uncertain economy.
1
146
Recommendations: Staff recommends first reading approval of the revised spending plan for
2020, allowing for the re-appropriation of one-time capital and operational project budgets that
lapsed at the end of 2019, approval of new requested funding, and to also reduce spending in
other areas to respond to a new economic environment.
City Manager Comments:
Original
Budget
Ord #4 & Ord #5
(Series 2020)
Spring
Supplemental
Revised
Budget
Proj. Opening Balance $123,305,817 $0 $89,290,241 $212,596,058
Original Revenues $151,495,585 $0 $0 $151,495,585
New Revenues $0 $0 $617,380 $617,380
Transfers $0 $0 $199,590 $199,590
COVID Reductions (Exh G) $0 $0 ($25,016,960) ($25,016,960)
COVID Increases $0 $3,500,000 $0 $3,500,000
Revenues $151,495,585 $3,500,000 ($24,199,990) $130,795,595
Base $74,897,470 $0 $0 $74,897,470
New Requests (Exh B) $1,979,440 $0 $198,270 $2,177,710
Savings Program (Exh C) $0 $0 $3,826,330 $3,826,330
Carry Forwards (Exh D) $0 $0 $1,049,930 $1,049,930
Technical (Exh F) $0 $0 $468,980 $468,980
COVID Increases $0 $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000
COVID Reductions (Exh H) $0 $0 ($9,136,060) ($9,136,060)
Operating Budget $76,876,910 $6,000,000 ($3,592,550) $79,284,360
Original $28,660,750 $0 N/A $28,660,750
New Requests (Exh B) $0 $0 $1,050,980 $1,050,980
Carry Forwards (Exh E) $0 $0 $51,324,198 $51,324,198
Technical (Exh F) $0 $0 $101,760 $101,760
COVID Reductions (Exh H) $0 $0 ($4,909,700) ($4,909,700)
Capital Outlay $28,660,750 $0 $47,567,238 $76,227,988
Debt Service $7,408,320 $0 $0 $7,408,320
Net Appropriations $112,945,980 $6,000,000 $43,974,688 $162,920,668
Original Transfers $34,501,270 $0 $0 $34,501,270
Technical (Exh F) $0 $0 $199,590 $199,590
COVID Reductions (Exh H) $0 $0 ($2,107,520) ($2,107,520)
COVID Increases $0 $3,500,000 $0 $3,500,000
Transfers $34,501,270 $3,500,000 ($1,907,930) $36,093,340
Total Appropriations $147,447,250 $9,500,000 $42,066,758 $199,014,008
Proj. Ending Balance $127,354,152 ($6,000,000) $23,022,953 $144,377,645
2
147
CITY OF ASPEN 2020 APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDExhibit AFund NameProjected Opening Balance2020 Adopted RevenueOrdinances #4 & #52020 Spring Supplemental2020 Amended Revenue Budget2020 Adopted ExpenseOrdinances #4 & #52020 Spring Supplemental2020 Amended Expense Budget2020 Ending BalanceGeneral Governmental Fund 001 ‐ General Fund$21,738,324$36,091,050 $3,500,000 ($3,493,260) $36,097,790$36,709,130 $3,500,000 ($481,000) $39,728,130$18,107,984Subtotal General Gov't Funds$21,738,324$36,091,050 $3,500,000 ($3,493,260) $36,097,790 $36,709,130 $3,500,000 ($481,000) $39,728,130$18,107,984Special Revenue Governmental Funds100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund$7,722,372$13,692,910$0 ($4,214,700) $9,478,210 $14,180,960$0 ($1,202,628) $12,978,332$4,222,250120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund$32,616,443$5,865,220$0 ($1,972,000) $3,893,220 $5,459,320 $3,500,000 $1,084,691 $10,044,011$26,465,652130 ‐ Tourism Promotion Fund$103,630$2,993,610$0 ($1,240,900) $1,752,710 $2,991,800$0 ($1,240,900) $1,750,900$105,440131 ‐ Public Education Fund$0$2,920,000$0 ($823,000) $2,097,000 $2,920,000$0 ($823,000) $2,097,000$0132 ‐ REMP Fund$5,238,857$914,010$0$0 $914,010 $1,945,400$0$0 $1,945,400$4,207,467141 ‐ Transportation Fund$7,714,320$5,404,090$0 ($1,325,100) $4,078,990 $6,809,520$0 ($1,157,860) $5,651,660$6,141,650150 ‐ Housing Development Fund$48,525,279$21,687,160$0 ($4,359,000) $17,328,160 $16,488,840 $1,000,000 $13,695,697 $31,184,537$34,668,902152 ‐ Kids First Fund$6,279,775$2,334,325$0 ($679,000) $1,655,325 $2,709,290 $1,500,000 ($432,440) $3,776,850$4,158,250160 ‐ Stormwater Fund$1,673,013$1,436,490$0$0 $1,436,490 $1,364,030$0 $75,507 $1,439,537$1,669,966Subtotal Special Revenue Funds$109,873,689$57,247,815$0 ($14,613,700) $42,634,115 $54,869,160 $6,000,000 $9,999,067 $70,868,227$81,639,577Debt Service Governmental Fund250 ‐ Debt Service Fund$1,026,470$6,244,110 $0 $0 $6,244,110 $6,238,030 $0 $0 $6,238,030$1,032,550Subtotal Debt Service Fund$1,026,470$6,244,110 $0 $0 $6,244,110 $6,238,030 $0 $0 $6,238,030$1,032,550Capital Projects Governmental Funds000 ‐ Asset Management Plan Fund$47,271,740$9,723,680 $0 ($111,000) $9,612,680$3,502,700 $0 $28,535,156 $32,037,856$24,846,564Subtotal Capital Fund$47,271,740$9,723,680 $0 ($111,000) $9,612,680 $3,502,700 $0 $28,535,156 $32,037,856$24,846,564Enterprise Proprietary Funds421 ‐ Water Utility Fund$8,189,182$10,162,120 $0 ($699,300) $9,462,820$11,973,150 $0 $1,266,455 $13,239,605$4,412,397431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund$5,161,141$10,169,550 $0 ($1,106,600) $9,062,950$10,083,450 $0 $1,772,840 $11,856,290$2,367,801451 ‐ Parking Fund$7,082,783$4,939,030 $0 ($1,522,500) $3,416,530 $8,429,050$0 ($145,137) $8,283,913$2,215,400471 ‐ Golf Course Fund$576,062$2,578,450$0 ($856,110) $1,722,340 $2,341,270$0 ($312,535) $2,028,735$269,667491 ‐ Truscott I Housing Fund$894,922$2,401,400 $0 $0 $2,401,400 $2,268,290$0 $323,467 $2,591,757$704,565492 ‐ Marolt Housing Fund$2,041,095$1,453,120$0$0 $1,453,120 $2,457,590$0 $266,680 $2,724,270$769,945Subtotal Enterprise Funds$23,945,185$31,703,670$0 ($4,184,510) $27,519,160 $37,552,800$0 $3,171,770 $40,724,570$10,739,775Internal Proprietary Funds501 ‐ Employee Benefits Fund$3,867,693$5,538,880$0$0 $5,538,880 $5,806,600$0$0 $5,806,600$3,599,973505 ‐ Employee Housing Fund$3,902,169$2,576,640$0 ($1,797,520) $779,120 $421,410$0 $666,775 $1,088,185$3,593,104510 ‐ Information Technology Fund$970,788$2,369,740$0$0 $2,369,740 $2,347,420$0 $174,990 $2,522,410$818,118Subtotal Internal Service Funds$8,740,650$10,485,260$0 ($1,797,520) $8,687,740 $8,575,430$0 $841,765 $9,417,195$8,011,195ALL FUNDS$212,596,058$151,495,585 $3,500,000 ($24,199,990) $130,795,595 $147,447,250 $9,500,000 $42,066,758 $199,014,008$144,377,645Less Interfund Transfers$34,501,270 $3,500,000 ($1,907,930) $36,093,340 $34,501,270 $3,500,000 ($1,907,930) $36,093,340NET APPROPRIATIONS$116,994,315$0 ($22,292,060) $94,702,255 $112,945,980 $6,000,000 $43,974,688 $162,920,668RevenuesExpenses3148
Revenue
Department/Description Amount
Asset Management Plan Fund: Because of CDOT grant funding requirements, the timeline for completion
of the Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements project was advanced one year. The grant
redistributed cost sharing between the Transportation fund and the Asset Management fund, reducing the
original transfer amount of $156,000 from Transportation to $45,000.
($111,000)
000 ‐ Asset Management Fund Total:($111,000)
Transfer from Wheeler Opera House Fund: Transfer from the Wheeler Fund to cover a portion of the grant
review process assessment and overhaul, managed by the Quality Office within the Manager's Office. See
"New Requests" for further specifics around this ask.
$9,000
Transfer from Multiple Funds: Transfers from non‐General Fund departments associated with the Central
Savings program per City Financial Policies, equal to 10% of operational savings in the preceding year.
$93,590
City Manager Subtotal: $102,590
Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant funded Food Safety Program: The Environmental Health and Sustainability
Department was awarded two grants for a total of $6,000 to enhance the food safety program in the City of
Aspen. The first provides $3,000 to go towards providing food safety trainings for restaurants which can
cover costs such as language translation services, materials and supplies, and refreshments for the
trainings. The second, also for $3,000, goes to cover travel and lodging expenses plus registration for the
Food Program Manager to attend two conferences on food protection. One is put on by the FDA and the
other by the state of Colorado. This request is to extend spending authority in the lines listed to allow for
the use of the awarded grant dollars
$6,000
Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant funded Radon Program: EH&S requests the budget authority for a Radon
Reimbursement Grant budget of $4,880. With this grant, staff provides radon test kits and education to
residents in Aspen. Staff will provide training to the public on radon awareness in real estate transactions.
As part of the City's Radon Program staff will assistant homeowners with high radon by providing
information on how they can lower their lung cancer risk by installing radon mitigation and lowering radon
levels below the EPA action level of 4 pCi/L. Radon grant dollars also cover the cost of the department's
multi‐media outreach campaign on radon, including social media, newspaper ads, banners on Main Stand
informational post cards and posters posted throughout the community.
$4,880
Environmental Health Subtotal:$10,880
001 ‐ General Fund Total:$113,470
Wheeler: Aspen Public House Pipe Repair & On Going Maintenance: An unexpected repair to the pipe
that carries grease from the restaurant floor drains and dishwashing stations was required in order for the
restaurant to continue running efficiently and safely. This pipe must be maintained and pumped monthly
in order to abide with the required building code. In order to ensure that the tenant properly maintains this
item, Wheeler will schedule and oversee vendor in the monthly process ($750/month) and will charge the
cost back to the tenant in the monthly rent bill.
$9,000
120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund Total:$9,000
2020 SPRING SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE DETAIL
4
149
Revenue
Department/Description Amount
Updated revenue projection: Based on current trends revenue projections for Fire Charge ($25,500) and
Raw Water ($54,000) were increased.
$79,500
Grant Funded: The Bureau of Reclamation grant will be used to implement water AMI and meter
replacement projects.
$500,000
421 ‐ Water Utility Fund Total:$579,500
Updated revenue projection: Based on current trends revenue projections for Electric Development Fee
($18,000) were increased.
$18,000
Transfer from Water Utility Fund: Revised apportionment of the automated metering (AIM) project
between the two utility funds based on the benefits provided to each fund. A corresponding expense is
shown in the "Technical" section of this Spring Supplemental, with the result being a slightly smaller cost
burden to the Electric Utility.
$208,000
431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund Total: $226,000
Total Revenue:$816,970
New Revenue $617,380
Transfers $199,590
Total Revenue:$816,970
5
150
Exhibit B ‐ New Requests
Department/Description Amount
50486 Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements: CDOT awarded the City of Aspen a $600,000
grant for the Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements project. This is a reimbursement grant that
requires the project be completed by the end of 2021. The design work needs to be completed by fall of
2020, in order to solicit bids, conduct public outreach, and start construction in 2021. Funding and project
timelines need to be accelerated in order to meet the grant deadline. $156,000 was planned to be spent in
2021; however, this will need to be moved up to 2020 and the planned construction ($939,000) will be
moved to 2021. The current funding requirement from the Transportation fund and the AMP fund will be
reduced by $300,000 each. One‐time
$156,000
Ice Garden Sanitary Sewer Replacement: The discharging sanitary sewer on the north east corner of the Ice
Garden Center is in poor condition and could shut down the center if a break occurs. Funds would replace
approximately one block of pipe. Roots and age have minimized the current capacity of discharge and staff
anticipates this section of pipe to have remaining limited life. The project originally started under the Asset
group to finalize design and was transferred to Engineering for construction in the summer of 2019. One‐
time
$134,000
Airport Signal Repair: City Council approved the placement of a foundation and replacement of the light
pole that was damaged by a City vehicle on April 14, 2020 by Resolution #027. CDOT requested the City
proceed with the contracting and management of the project to reduce the cost by up to 25% and decrease
the time needed for placement of the signal. An insurance claim will be potentially required to cover cost
after placement is complete. One‐time
$75,980
000 ‐ Asset Management Fund Total: $365,980
City Manager Administrative Assistant (0.7 FTE): The City Manager’s Office previously shared a position
with the Finance Department to perform two full time functions, that of an Administrative Assistant for the
Manager’s Office as well as the City’s Procurement Officer. With the departure of this tenured individual,
the City has evaluated the needs of the organization and requests that these two roles be separated and
funded at a higher level to allow for a net increase of 1.0 FTE across the organization. Given the City's
volume of procurement and the needs of the Manager’s Office (including Council support), broadening the
expectations of these two positions to match the demands associated with both roles necessitates two full
time staff. On‐going
$61,640
Arts, Nonprofit, HHS Grant Program Evaluation: Based on feedback through previous award cycles, City
Staff has initiated a RFQ to seek out an organization to help administer an evaluation of the City’s grant
application and award process. This evaluation will include all grant awarding, including health and human
services (HHS), parks, recreation and the arts. The cost of the evaluation is estimated at $18,000 and is
proposed to be split between the General Fund and the Wheeler Opera House Fund. One‐time
$18,000
City Manager Subtotal $79,640
2020 SPRING SUPPLEMENTAL NEW REQUESTS
6
151
Exhibit B ‐ New Requests
Department/Description Amount
Procurement Officer (0.3 FTE): The City Manager’s Office previously shared a position with the Finance
Department to perform two full time functions, that of an Administrative Assistant for the Manager’s
Office as well as the City’s Procurement Officer. With the departure of this tenured individual, the City has
evaluated the needs of the organization and requests that these two roles be separated and funded at a
higher level to allow for a net increase of 1.0 FTE across the organization. Given the City's volume of
procurement and the needs of the Manager’s Office (including Council support), broadening the
expectations of these two positions to match the demands associated with both roles necessitates two full
time staff.
The Procurement Officer role has changed to require a much higher level of engagement, including
increased audit and compliance, legal, and award disclosure requirements. Because of these changes and
of the separation from the administrative roles pr evious layered on this position, the cost of this FTE is
higher than previously budgeted. On‐going
$32,830
Software Hosting Costs: Due to the delay in implementing new sales and lodging tax software, the Finance
Department is covering the maintenance and hosting costs for the legacy system longer than expected.
The additional cost for the year is slightly less than $9,000 and provides for technical assistance with the
system that continues to be "temperamental". Ultimately, Finance would like to turn on the new system in
Oct/Nov to take advantage of the functionality of the new system, but understands that the current
environment is not the right moment to make the system live. One‐time.
$8,800
Finance Subtotal:$41,630
Fee‐in‐Lieu Study Extension: In August of 2019, City Council approved a professional services contract with
White and Smith, in partnership with TischlerBise, for a study of Aspen's Fee‐in‐Lieu (FIL) for affordable
housing mitigation. The study is evaluating the calculation, updates methods, legal sufficiency of related
code language and methodology, and relationship of the FIL to the Affordable Housing Credits Program.
The report will make recommendations for improvements to the program. Per Council direction following
discussion of the report, a new contract with the c onsultant team would provide direction on any
additional requested analysis. One‐time
$25,000
Planning Subtotal:$25,000
001 ‐ General Fund Total: $146,270
Theater Project Study Phase II ‐ Organizational Assessment: Following input from City Council in Fall 2019,
the Wheeler Opera House staff increased the scope of work for the Theatre Projects 2019 contract (Phase I
Feasibility Study). Phase II will include conducting an organizational/departmental review of the Wheeler
Opera House to determine the Wheeler's success in meeting its strategic goals over the last five years as
well as a review and recommendations for the long‐term sustainability and organization of the department.
This additional scope of work will include operations analysis, staff interviews and final recommendations.
The study beings on March 29 and will be completed by July 1, 2020. One‐time
$35,000
7
152
Exhibit B ‐ New Requests
Department/Description Amount
Aspen Public House Pipe Repair and Maintenance: An unexpected repair ($9,000) to the pipe that carries
grease from the restaurant floor drains and dishwashing stations was required in order for the restaurant
to continue running efficiently and safely. This pipe must be maintained and pumped monthly in order to
abide with the required building code. In order to ensure that the tenant properly maintains this item,
Wheeler will schedule and oversee vendor in the monthly process ($750/month) and will charge the cost
back to the tenant in the monthly rent bill.
$17,000
120 ‐ Wheeler Fund Total: $52,000
Yellow Brick Entrance Concrete Repair: The entrance landings and stairs have been deteriorating for a
number of years. The plan calls for removing the existing paint, patching, and cleaning the concrete stairs
and landings at east and west main entrances, repairing and encapsulating the steel stair nosing’s in an
epoxy paint, and adding a clear protective coating to the concrete surfaces. With a focus on historic
sensitivity, this process will improve the aesthetics at the entrances and protect the stairs from further
deterioration. This work is expected to last for ten years with minor touch ups. One‐time
$45,000
152 ‐ Kid's First Fund Total: $45,000
50745 Drying Bed Maintenance and Rebuild: The backwash pond for the clarifier residuals needs to have
the materials removed and taken to the landfill. The second piece of the project is to rebuild the drying bed
for placement of the new materials stored from the plant. One‐time
$160,000
421 ‐ Water Utility Fund Total: $160,000
Renovations of Existing Employee Housing Units: Units within the current City of Aspen inventory have
been occupied for decades without significant improvements. As these units turnover, the City needs to
perform renovations to make them livable for new tenants. The prior City Manager unit on Cemetery Lane
will be renovated and converted into two units, providing additional housing in the city. Units at Water
Place need carpet, paint, and countertop replacements, plus one unit needs changes to plumbing for
kitchen and laundry locations. The proposed renovations will give these units new or extended useful life
and help the City to ensure an appropriate level of ho using for its staff. One‐time.
$480,000
505 ‐ Employee Housing Fund Total: $480,000
Total New Requests ‐ First Reading:$1,249,250
Total New Requests ‐ Second Reading:$0
Total Requests:$1,249,250
8
153
Exhibit C ‐ Savings
2020 DEPARTMENTAL SAVINGS
Fund/Department Central Savings "10%" Department Savings "50%"
COVID19: 50% Reduction
in Department Savings
City Clerk (113)$20 $27,290 $13,650
City Manager (114)$455,550 $285,650 $142,830
Human Resources (115)$8,920 $44,120 $22,060
City Attorney (116)$3,530 $80,380 $40,190
Finance (117)$12,910 $321,960 $160,980
Asset Management (119)$8,420 $41,580 $20,790
Planning (122)$6,050 $144,800 $72,400
Building (123)$2,430 $32,520 $16,260
Police (221)$8,920 $44,120 $22,060
Streets (321)$4,180 $290,080 $145,040
Engineering (327)$7,210 $35,070 $17,540
Environmental Health (431)$5,230 $102,210 $51,110
Special Events (532)$6,220 $133,070 $66,540
Recreation / ARC / AIG (Based on Subsidy) ‐ 542 $10,680 $109,500 $54,750
Red Brick Center for the Arts (552)$7,290 $78,150 $39,080
001 ‐ General Fund $547,560 $1,770,500 $885,280
100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund $960 $104,970 $52,490
120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund $0 $0 $0
141 ‐ Transportation Fund $6,410 $161,980 $80,990
152 ‐ Kids First Fund $5,950 $127,460 $63,730
160 ‐ Stormwater Fund $24,110 $122,790 $61,400
421 ‐ Water Utility Fund $0 $252,830 $126,420
431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund $42,950 $356,870 $178,440
451 ‐ Parking Fund $0 $55,550 $27,780
471 ‐ Golf Fund $5,210 $73,210 $36,610
510 ‐ Information Technology Fund $0 $167,020 $83,510
Total Savings to Be Appropriated $633,150 $3,193,180 $1,596,650
The purpose of allowing carryforward savings is to provide an additional incentive for frugality by
operating departments. Unlike traditional governments, which have a “use it or lose it” approach to
annual operating budgets, Aspen’s policy encourages departments to create savings in their annual
operating budgets. Savings in annual operating budgets are distributed as follows:
50% of the savings are carried forward into the appropriate department’s savings account.
10% is allocated to a Central Savings account.
40% is returned to the appropriate fund balance.
Carryforward Savings represent 50% of the previous year’s operating budget savings from individual
Departments or Funds. Departments and Funds are allocated these amounts as a reward for finding
efficiencies in their operations that meet their operating goals while spending less than their
appropriations. Prior year savings that are not expended are maintained in full and appropriated every
year unless directed otherwise by the City Manager. These appropriations can be spent on items
related to the Department’s or Fund’s mission but may not be used for ongoing expenditures. If a
particular expenditure was denied as part of the budget process, departmental savings may not be used
for this purpose without City Manager approval. Expenditures of $10,000 or more must be approved by
the City Manager. Departments and Funds can accrue these savings to a maximum of 15% of their
operating budgets.
Financial constraints related to the COVID19 pandemic mean that the normal 50% departmental
carryforward amount has been reduced by 50%.
9
154
Exhibit D ‐ Operation Carry Forwards
2020 OPERATIONAL CARRY FORWARDS
Department/Description Amount
ERP ‐ Support Contract ‐ Funds will be used to support benefits/payroll configuration, benefits self‐service,
open enrollment, and other Human Resources related systems.
$15,000
Human Resources Subtotal: $15,000
ERP ‐ Support Contract ‐ Funds will be used to support payroll, procurement, reporting, and configuration
of various finance related systems.
$41,700
Finance Subtotal: $41,700
Historic Preservation Review Sheets ‐ Approved by Council on November 27, 2017. In 2017, Community
Development Staff undertook enforcement on a historic preservation project where work was taking place
contrary to HPC approvals and building permits. The enforcement action resulted in a $30,000 financial
assurance the owner was required to post during construction that would not be refunded. Council
approved moving the forfeited funds into ComDev's operating budget to create new processes to prevent
future violations. Phase 1 of this project was completed in 2018, and resulted in a number of suggested
Phase 2 implementation steps. Progress was made in 2019, but other workload, in particular Council
directed amendments to preservation benefits, took priority. One‐quarter of the original budget remains
and will be used to conclude the project in 2020.
$6,980
Historic Preservation Benefits Outreach ‐ Approved by Council May 29, 2018. City Council identified
amendments to historic preservation benefits as a priority in 2018, and authorized staff to conduct public
outreach. Although outreach, such as an online survey, was completed, staff did the work in‐house and
funding was not used. Adoption of the requested amendments took until summer 2019 to complete. Staff
would like to focus the unspent funds, plus additional savings in the Community Development Department
budget, promoting remaining benefits. This could include developing a technical assistance program on the
care of historic buildings and public education tools about Aspen's designated properties, such as creating
a book, brochures, or marker program.
$35,000
Electronic Permit System Training ‐ Council approved funds for the design, build, and implementation of a
new permits management system for the City. All development permits are live in the system, and land use
applications are just starting to be put into the system. These funds will be used to train both staff and
stakeholders in the system's operation. In addition, we need to invest funds to train staff involved with
system administration to increase internal capacity to address ongoing maintenance and system issues.
$30,870
Wireless Facilities Design Guidelines and Public Outreach ‐ Approved August 8, 2019. Staff request funds
be carried forward to complete the final work on the Wireless Communications Facilities Design Guidelines
to ensure the City has robust requirements related to wireless facilities, particularly in the right‐of‐way.
Funds have thus far enabled staff to provide information to the community about the changed local
regulations in response to state and federal rules, as well as provided an opportunity for the community to
weigh in on other changes they desire. Council passed Ordinance #3 Series 2020 on April 28, 2020.
$30,260
10
155
Exhibit D ‐ Operation Carry Forwards
Department/Description Amount
Census Organizing Project ‐ Approved on April 9, 2019. In 2018, Council approved the Census Organizing
Project to develop and execute a plan for the City of Aspen to assist with the 2020 U.S. Census. These funds
need to be carried forward in order to complete the project and support the City's collaborative efforts
with Census project partners valley‐wide.
$16,190
Affordable Housing Fee‐in‐Lieu Update ‐ Approved on August 26, 2019. The land use code requires an
update to the cash‐in‐lieu charged for affordable housing mitigation every five years. City Council
requested this study be accelerated by a year and completed in 2019. The project focuses on more Aspen‐
specific costs, rather than national or statewide averages as the current fee does. Additionally, the fee will
be updated to reflect the elimination of categories 6 and 7 in the Housing Guidelines. The rollover of these
funds from 2019 will allow the contract for White and Smith, in partnership with TischlerBise, to complete
the FIL report.
$33,450
Lift 1A Planning ‐ Approved by Council in 2019 as a supplemental funding request. Staff requests carryover
of the supplemental funding to address potential additional review and partnership needs that may arise
as part of the ongoing Lift 1 process. All stakeholders are working together in moving forward with final
development applications for the project. As the City is heavily involved in this effort, funds will assist the
City in covering miscellaneous additional expenses that may arise, including any costs related to seeking a
tramway board variance, community outreach, and additional work that may be needed as the proposal is
revised and finalized.
$15,000
Community Development Subtotal: $167,750
001 ‐ General Fund Total: $224,450
Aggregate Equipment/Maintenance/Repair Carry Forwards $466,780
Aggregate PC Replacement Carry Forwards $339,480
Aggregate Workstation Replacement Carry Forwards $19,220
Other Operational Carry Forward Requests Total: $825,480
Total Operational Carry Forward Requests:$1,049,930
11
156
Exhibit E ‐ Capital Carry Forwards
2020 CAPITAL CARRY FORWARDS
Project Title
Lifetime
Budget
2019 Carry
Forward
Completion
Estimate
50922 HWY 82 Roundabout Evaluation $128,000 $128,000 Fall 2020
50486 Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements $1,416,000 $111,365 Fall 2022
50473 Paving 4th Street Design and Construction $110,000 $0 Fall 2020
50903 Summer Road Improvements ‐ 2019 $70,000 $22,000 Fall 2020
50488 Ute Avenue Traffic Calming and Trail Connection $240,000 $52,500 Spring 2021
50844 Phase 1 Main St Improvements to signals with CDOT Coordination $40,000 $40,000 Spring 2021
50842 City Survey Monument Maintenance $20,000 $8,961 Summer 2020
Engineering Subtotal:$362,826
50952 ARC Downstairs Remodel $450,000 $100,000 12/1/2020
50360 AIG Cooling Tower replacement $85,000 $84,728 11/1/2020
50956 Water Feature Replacement $95,000 $44,277 12/1/2020
50945 Sound Baffling $90,000 $34,617 10/1/2020
50797 ARC Siding $15,000 $10,522 10/31/2020
Recreation Subtotal:$274,144
50064_APD Project $22,861,668 $9,758 9/1/2020
50074_Pedestrian Mall ‐ Planning and Design (ONLY)$1,942,000 $923,782 12/31/2020
50060_Old Powerhouse Preservation Project $3,551,700 $0 12/31/2024
51112 City Offices ‐ 425 Rio Grande $33,040,260 $26,307,409 12/31/2021
51113 City Offices ‐ Armory Renovation $13,911,660 $200,000 12/31/2024
51114 City Offices ‐ Existing Rio Grande Building $1,200,000 $1,200,000 12/31/2021
Asset Management Subtotal:$28,640,949
51059 Core City Network ‐ AMP ‐ 2019 $195,700 $195,700 7/1/2021
Information Technology Subtotal:$195,700
50259_Electronic Permitting System $719,350 $19,262 6/1/2020
Community Development ‐ Planning Subtotal:$19,262
50829 Electrical Restraint Device and Cameras $89,000 $31,055 12/31/2020
51012 Dispatch Center Equipment ‐ 2019 $113,200 $113,200 12/31/2020
Police Subtotal:$144,255
51014 Fleet ‐ 2019 $585,800 $237,600 2/29/2020
51016 Electrical ‐ Streets Facilities ‐ 2019 $54,200 $0 11/30/2020
50834 Exterior Streets Facilities 2018 $48,200 $0 11/30/2020
Streets Subtotal:$237,600
000 ‐ Asset Management Fund Total:$29,874,736
50309_Castle Creek Music School Trail $1,109,000 $1,109,000 9/30/2020
51186 Galena Plaza and Pedestrian Corridor $1,226,120 $163,598 10/31/2021
50974 Parks Campus Drainage and Paving $150,000 $0 10/31/2020
50285_Cozy Point Grading/Drainage Improvements $180,000 $0 10/31/2020
50977 Cozy Point Ranch Management Plan Implementation*$250,000 $0 10/31/2020
51001 Tiehack / Maroon Creek Bridges Concrete Repairs $60,000 $0 10/31/2020
50971 Fleet ‐ Parks ‐ 2019 $349,000 $47,721 6/30/2020
50779 Oklahoma Flat Trail Railing Replacement $55,000 $0 8/31/2020
12
157
Exhibit E ‐ Capital Carry Forwards
Project Title
Lifetime
Budget
2019 Carry
Forward
Completion
Estimate
50872 John Denver Sanctuary $94,579 $30,834 8/31/2020
50078_Hunter/Smuggler Co‐Op Implementation ‐ Recreation $125,000 $0 11/30/2020
50322 Glory Hole Park $225,000 $0 10/31/2020
51111 Lift 1A/Dolinsek Planning $30,000 $5,000 10/31/2021
50986 Irrigation Efficiency Improvements $200,000 $17,839 10/31/2020
50772 Archery Range Improvements $15,000 $0 10/31/2020
100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund Total:$1,373,992
51036 Production Improvements ‐ 2019 $166,550 $106,577 5/1/2020
51030 Interior ‐ Wheeler Opera House ‐ 2019 $57,000 $15,277 6/1/2020
51042 Core City Network ‐ Wheeler ‐ 2019 $6,000 $6,000 12/31/2020
51041 Wheeler Building and Site Improvements $2,283,420 $1,775,415 11/1/2020
51031 Electrical ‐ W heeler Opera House ‐ 2019 $124,000 $103,722 12/31/2020
120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund Total:$2,006,991
51109 CMAQ Grant for WE‐Cycle Stations and Equipment $180,000 $180,000 12/31/2020
51085 Rubey Park Maintenance ‐ 2019 $138,400 $0 12/31/2020
141 ‐ Transportation Fund Total:$180,000
50542_PPP Development Rental Housing $25,650,000 $13,595,215 12/31/2020
51225 Lumber Yard Housing Development $76,675,000 $61,960 12/31/2028
51088 Burlingame Phase 3 ‐ Public Outreach and Design $500,000 $38,102 12/31/2024
150 ‐ Housing Development Fund Total:$13,695,277
51020 Park Avenue Stormwater Conveyance ‐ 2019 $100,000 $0 12/1/2020
50849 Master Planning ‐ River Management Plan Phase II $60,000 $60,000 12/1/2020
51021 Mud and Debris Flow Alert System ‐ 2019 $50,000 $50,000 12/1/2020
50129_Aspen Mtn Drainage Basin Improvements $250,506 $30,896 4/1/2020
50126_SW Master Planning 2016 $225,000 $31,637 12/1/2020
50850 Master Planning ‐ Riparian Area Master Plan $60,000 $19,134 6/1/2020
160 ‐ Stormwater Fund Total:$191,667
50135_Reclaimed Waterline Completion at ACSD $1,742,910 $0 2022 ‐ 2023
50132_New Equipment Storage Building $880,000 $312,733 12/31/2020
50565 Castle Creek Headgate/Pipeline $160,000 $124,950 12/31/2020
50568 Reservoir and Water Treatment Plant and Improvements $120,000 $119,915 12/31/2020
50745 Backwash Pond ‐ Master Plan & Solids Mitigation $1,110,000 $81,778 12/31/2020
50566 Maroon Creek Headgate/Pipeline $160,000 $67,401 12/31/2020
50939 Maroon Creek Hydro Building Repairs $60,000 $59,024 12/31/2020
50942 Integrated Resource Plan $275,000 $51,895 2020‐2021
50573 Altitude Valve at Tiehack Tank $50,000 $50,000 12/31/2020
50937 WTP Campus ‐ Exterior Building Improvements $645,000 $47,600 12/31/2022
50927 Fleet ‐ Water ‐ 2019 $45,000 $45,000 12/31/2020
50755 USGS Gaging Stations ‐ 2018 $40,000 $40,000 12/31/2020
50556_Water Site Maintenance $125,000 $34,872 12/31/2020
51079 Core City Network ‐ Water ‐ 2019 $12,700 $12,700 12/31/2021
50571 12 Inch Line to Tiehack Tank Feed $1,835,000 $12,614 12/31/2020
50933 Kayak Course Improvements ‐ 2019 $10,000 $10,000 12/31/2020
50265_Core City Network ‐ Water ‐ 2016 $8,240 $1,163 12/31/2021
421 ‐ Water Utility Fund Total:$1,071,645
13
158
Exhibit E ‐ Capital Carry Forwards
Project Title
Lifetime
Budget
2019 Carry
Forward
Completion
Estimate
50594 Electric AMI ‐ Mesh Network $1,800,000 $1,776,620 2021‐2022
50891 Electric System Replacement ‐ 2019 $200,000 $35,000 12/31/2020
50595 Other Renewable Opportunities ‐ 2018 $50,000 $26,065 2021‐2022
50897 Core City Network ‐ Electric ‐ 2019 $3,500 $3,500 12/31/2021
50266_Core City Network ‐ Electric ‐ 2016 $2,580 $1,395 12/31/2021
431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund Total:$1,842,580
51119 30 Additional Parking Spaces $95,000 $0 12/31/2020
50605 Kiosk ‐ Airport $110,000 $16,673 7/20/2020
51026 Core City Network ‐ Parking ‐ 2019 $6,000 $6,000 12/31/2020
50267_Core City Network ‐ Parking ‐ 2016 $5,600 $5,600 12/31/2020
451 ‐ Parking Fund Total:$28,273
50783 Fleet ‐ Golf ‐ 2018 $154,000 $0 12/31/2020
50203_Fleet ‐ Golf ‐ 2016 $135,250 $0 12/31/2020
51008 Core City Network ‐ Golf ‐ 2019 $10,350 $10,350 12/31/2020
50198_Exterior ‐ Golf and Nordic Clubhouse $7,400 $0 12/31/2020
51007 Golf Course Annual Improvements ‐ 2019 $10,000 $0 12/31/2020
50784 Facility Work ‐ Golf and Nordic Clubhouse $104,400 $0 12/31/2020
50271_Core City Network ‐ Golf ‐ 2016 $5,600 $2,045 12/31/2020
471 ‐ Golf Course Fund Total:$12,395
51072 Truscott Phase I ‐ 400‐1000 Roof and Gutter Replacement $657,427 $319,057 12/31/2020
50624 Truscott Asphalt Overlay $40,000 $0 12/31/2020
51073 Truscott Boiler in Clubhouse $25,000 $0 12/31/2020
51074 Truscott Clubhouse Deck Replacement $25,000 $0 12/31/2020
50854 Truscott Snow Removal Equipment Replacement $10,000 $0 12/31/2020
491 ‐ Truscott I Housing Fund Total:$319,057
51066 Marolt ‐ Full Exterior Paint & Repair $275,000 $275,000 11/1/2020
492 ‐ Marolt Housing Fund Total:$275,000
50231_540 Employee Housing ‐ Construction $5,426,830 $124,775 12/31/2020
50681_Water Place Phase II ‐ Design $3,350,000 $62,000 12/31/2021
505 ‐ Employee Housing Fund Total:$186,775
50237_Galena Plaza Fiber $125,000 $80,177 7/1/2021
51055 Small Cell ‐ 2019 $60,000 $60,000 12/31/2020
51043 Fiber Investments ‐ 2019 $115,000 $55,736 12/31/2020
51044 Network Services ‐ 2019 $86,000 $50,000 12/31/2020
50819 Microsoft Active Directory Upgrade $18,150 $11,635 12/31/2020
51048 CitySource Refresh ‐ 2019 $8,000 $0 12/31/2020
50879 Community Broadband – Create Aspen MeetMe Center $86,000 $4,193 12/31/2020
51107 Streets Generator $30,000 $4,069 9/1/2020
510 ‐ Information Technology Fund Total:$265,810
Grand Total:$51,324,198
14
159
Exhibit F ‐ Technical Adjustments
2020 TECHNICAL ADJUSTMENTS
Department/Description Amount
Net Zero Impact ‐ The GIS flyover project (51252 GIS Aerial Photography ‐ 2020) update came in under
budget. The unspent authority (plus additional departmental savings) is requested within the Engineering
operational budget to pay for temporary labor costs to incorporate the updated data into the GIS layers.
($29,560)
000 ‐ Asset Management Fund Total:($29,560)
Tobacco Tax for Human Services: Revenues collected from the City's tobacco tax will be used to pay for a
portion of an intergovernmental agreement for the provision of mental health services in Pitkin County.
The adopted 2020 budget included $74,078 in funding for this IGA. The total cost to the City of the IGA is
$107,550. The resolution to adopt the agreement is scheduled to go before Council on May 12, 2020.
$33,420
Mayor and Council Subtotal: $33,420
Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant funded Food Safety Program: The Environmental Health and Sustainability
Department was awarded two grants for a total of $6,000 to enhance the food safety program in the City of
Aspen. The first provides $3,000 to go towards providing food safety trainings for restaurants which can
cover costs such as language translation services, materials and supplies, and refreshments for the
trainings. The second, also for $3,000, goes to cover travel and lodging expenses plus registration for the
Food Program Manager to attend two conferences on food protection. One is put on by the FDA and the
other by the state of Colorado. This request is to extend spending authority in the lines listed to allow for
the use of the awarded grant dollars
$6,000
Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant funded Radon Program: EH&S requests the budget authority for a Radon
Reimbursement Grant budget of $4,880. With this grant, staff provides radon test kits and education to
residents in Aspen. Staff will provide training to the public on radon awareness in real estate transactions.
As part of the City's Radon Program staff will assistant homeowners with high radon by providing
information on how they can lower their lung cancer risk by installing radon mitigation and lowering radon
levels below the EPA action level of 4 pCi/L. Radon grant dollars also cover the cost of the department's
multi‐media outreach campaign on radon, including social media, newspaper ads, banners on Main Stand
informational post cards and posters posted throughout the community.
$4,880
Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant Funded: In late 2019, the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA)
awarded a $24,740 grant to the City of Aspen in support of ComDev's Uphill Economy initiative. The
Department requests that Council increase the Community Development Department's appropriation in
the amount of the grant to enable the Department to further the goals of the Uphill Economy program.
$24,740
Environmental Health Subtotal: $35,620
Net Zero Impact ‐ GIS Flyover Temporary Labor Support: In order to incorporate the scheduled 2020
flyover data, the City needs to bring in temporary labor to update the multiple GIS layers. Each
department's savings were reduced, as was project 51252 GIS Aerial Photography ‐ 2020 for the unneeded
authority that remained once the bids were collected.
$47,840
Engineering Subtotal: $47,840
001 ‐ General Fund Total:$116,880
15
160
Exhibit F ‐ Technical Adjustments
Department/Description Amount
Transfer ‐ Arts, Non‐Profit, & HHS City of Aspen Grant Program Evaluation (50% Contribution)The City of
Aspen, led by the Quality Office, is completing an assessment of the overall grants program and has
completed vendor selection. The allocated amount needed to cover the cost of administering this
evaluation is estimated at $18,000 to be split between the City of Aspen General Fund and the Wheeler
Opera House Fund. The Wheeler's 50% project contribution ($9,000) was authorized but not budgeted for
in the 2020 planning cycle. The Wheeler Arts Grants account for approximately 25% of the overall grant
pool.
$9,000
120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund Total:$9,000
Transfer ‐ Reduced the transfer to the Asset Management fund based on the timing and grant funding of
the 50486 Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements project. See new requests for additional
details.
($111,000)
141 ‐ Transportation Fund Total:($111,000)
50568 Reservoir and Water Treatment Plant and Improvements: (Resolution #29 Apr 14, 2020)
Replacement of slide gates, overflow piping at reservoir, chara weed removal, East WTP flocculator rebuild,
replacing two filter inlet valves, and concrete repair work.
$131,320
Transfer ‐ Revised apportionment of the automated metering (AIM) project between the two utility funds
based on the benefits provided to each fund resulting in a slightly smaller cost burden to the Electric Utility.
$208,000
421 Water Utility Fund Total:$339,320
Workers' Compensation was not loaded in the system when the 2020 Budget Resolution was calculated for
adoption. This action corrects this oversight.
001 ‐ General Fund $185,760
100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund $70,260
120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund $14,130
141 ‐ Transportation Fund $1,940
150 ‐ Housing Development Fund $1,330
152 ‐ Kids First Fund $2,170
160 ‐ Stormwater Fund $6,900
421 ‐ Water Utility Fund $27,200
431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund $13,880
451 ‐ Parking Fund $15,850
471 ‐ Golf Course Fund $9,610
491 ‐ Truscott I Housing Fund $1,220
492 ‐ Marolt Housing Fund $1,130
510 ‐ Information Technology Fund $720
16
161
Exhibit F ‐ Technical Adjustments
Department/Description Amount
Transfer: The City is updating its GIS maps with an updated flyover and costs are being distributed to
various user departments.
572 ‐ Parks and Open Space $1,000
132 ‐ Transportation $1,000
421 ‐ Kids First $500
328 ‐ Stormwater $1,000
322 ‐ Water $1,000
323 ‐ Electric $1,000
136 ‐ Parking $1,000
582 ‐ Golf Course $500
118 ‐ Information Technology $1,000
Transfer: To Central Savings.
100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund $960
141 ‐ Transportation Fund $6,410
152 ‐ Kids First Fund $5,950
160 ‐ Stormwater Fund $24,110
431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund $42,950
471 ‐ Golf Fund $5,210
Total Technical Adjustments $770,330
Transfers $199,590
Operations $439,420
Capital $131,320
Total Technical Adjustments $770,330
17
162
Exhibit G ‐ COVID Revenue Adjustments
2020 COVID REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Taxes Fees Transfers Total Reductions
001 ‐ General Fund ($2,331,000) ($1,275,730) $0 ($3,606,730)
100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund ($4,114,700) $0 ($100,000)($4,214,700)
120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund ($1,981,000) $0 $0 ($1,981,000)
130 ‐ Tourism Promotion Fund ($1,240,900) $0 $0 ($1,240,900)
131 ‐ Public Education Fund ($823,000) $0 $0 ($823,000)
141 ‐ Transportation Fund ($1,325,100) $0 $0 ($1,325,100)
150 ‐ Housing Development Fund ($4,359,000) $0 $0 ($4,359,000)
152 ‐ Kids First Fund ($679,000) $0 $0 ($679,000)
421 ‐ Water Utility Fund $0 ($1,278,800) $0 ($1,278,800)
431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund $0 ($1,332,600) $0 ($1,332,600)
451 ‐ Parking Fund $0 ($1,522,500) $0 ($1,522,500)
471 ‐ Golf Course Fund $0 ($646,110) ($210,000)($856,110)
505 ‐ Employee Housing Fund $0 $0 ($1,797,520)($1,797,520)
Total Across Funds (16,853,700) (6,055,740) (2,107,520) (25,016,960)
18
163
Exhibit H ‐ COVID Expense Adjustments
2020 COVID EXPENSE ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Labor / GOMs Operating / Savings Capital Transfers Total
000 ‐ Asset Management Plan Fund $0 $0 ($1,676,000) $0 ($1,676,000)
001 ‐ General Fund ($1,478,410) ($1,812,270) $0 ($892,910)($4,183,590)
100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund ($245,480) ($233,200) ($1,835,300) ($443,250)($2,757,230)
120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund ($33,080) ($181,000) ($703,000) ($86,180)($1,003,260)
130 ‐ Tourism Promotion Fund $0 ($1,240,900) $0 $0 ($1,240,900)
131 ‐ Public Education Fund $0 ($823,000) $0 $0 ($823,000)
141 ‐ Transportation Fund ($8,280) ($1,367,880) $0 ($33,150)($1,409,310)
150 ‐ Housing Development Fund ($1,650)$0 $0 $0 ($1,650)
152 ‐ Kids First Fund ($89,230) ($83,730) ($406,700) ($50,400)($630,060)
160 ‐ Stormwater Fund ($34,190) ($101,610) $0 ($138,480)($274,280)
421 ‐ Water Utility Fund ($19,490) ($451,870) $0 ($165,450)($636,810)
431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund ($58,140) ($345,280) $0 ($87,830)($491,250)
451 ‐ Parking Fund ($23,140) ($184,970) $0 ($95,930)($304,040)
471 ‐ Golf Course Fund ($39,340) ($137,670) ($198,700) ($48,750)($424,460)
491 ‐ Truscott I Housing Fund ($2,140)$0 $0 ($8,930)($11,070)
492 ‐ Marolt Housing Fund ($2,010)$0 $0 ($8,330)($10,340)
510 ‐ Information Technology Fund ($11,580) ($126,520) ($90,000) ($47,930)($276,030)
Total ($2,046,160) ($7,089,900) ($4,909,700) ($2,107,520) ($16,153,280)
19
164
ORDINANCE No. 7
(Series of 2020)
AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING AN INCREASE IN THE
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FUND EXPENDITURES OF $28,535,156;
WHEELER OPERA HOUSE FUND OF $1,084,691;
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND OF $13,695,697;
STORMWATER FUND OF $75,507;
WATER UTILITY FUND OF $1,266,455;
ELECTRIC UTILITY FUND OF $1,772,840;
TRUSCOTT I HOUSING FUND OF $323,467;
MAROLT HOUSING FUND OF $266,680;
EMPLOYEE HOUSING FUND $666,775;
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OF $174,990.
AN ORDINANCE DECREASING AN APPROPRIATION IN THE
GENERAL FUND OF $481,000;
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE FUND OF $1,202,628;
TOURISM PROMOTION FUND OF $1,240,900;
PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND OF $823,000
KIDS FIRST FUND OF $432,440;
TRANSPORTATION FUND OF $1,157,860;
PARKING FUND OF $145,137;
GOLF COURSE FUND OF $312,535.
WHEREAS, by virtue of Section 9.12 of the Home Rule Charter, the City Council may make
supplemental appropriations; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has certified that the City has unappropriated current year revenues
and/or unappropriated prior year fund balance available for appropriations in the following
funds: Asset Management Plan Fund, General Fund, Parks And Open Space Fund, Wheeler Opera
House Fund, Tourism Promotion Fund, Public Education Fund, Transportation Fund, Housing
Development Fund, Kids First Fund, Stormwater Fund, Water Utility Fund, Electric Utility Fund,
Parking Fund, Golf Course Fund, Truscott Housing Fund, Marolt Housing Fund, Employee Housing
Fund, Information Technology Fund.
WHEREAS, the City Council is advised that certain expenditures, revenue and transfers must be
approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
165
Section 1
Upon the City Manager’s certification that there are current year revenues and/or prior year fund
balances available for appropriation in the above-mentioned funds, the City Council hereby
makes supplemental appropriations as itemized in the Exhibit A.
Section 2
If any section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason
invalid or unconstitutional by any court or competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed
a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portion thereof.
INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED AND/OR POSTED ON FIRST
READING on the 12th day of May 2020.
A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 26th day of May 2020, in the City
Council Chambers, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
FINALLY ADOPTED AFTER PUBLIC HEARING on the 26th day of May 2020.
ATTEST:
________________________ ________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
Approved as to Form:
________________________
Jim True, City Attorney
166
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council
FROM:Kevin Rayes, Planner
THRU:Phillip Supino, Community Development Director
MEMO DATE:May 4, 2020
MEETING DATE:May 12
th, 2020
RE:Extension of Vested Rights Request –Aspen Valley Hospital (AVH),
401 Castle Creek Road: Resolution No. 041, Series of 2020
APPLICANT:Aspen Valley Hospital
District, a Special District (Health
District)
REPRESENTATIVE:Chris Bendon,
Bendon Adams
LOCATION:401 Castle Creek
Road
CURRENT ZONING:Public (PUB)
with a Planned Development
Overlay
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The
Applicant seeks an extension of
vested property rights for the
development of Phase IV of the
Aspen Valley Hospital District
Master Facilities Plan.The
applicant is requesting a five (5)
year extension that would extend
vesting until May 23
rd, 2025. This
application represents the 1st
extension of vested rights request
by the Applicant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends that City
Council approve Resolution No. 041, Series 2020
thereby approving the request for an extension of vested
rights.
Figure 1: Master Site Phasing Diagram
167
Page 2 of 3
REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL:The Applicant is requesting a five (5) year extension of vested
rights for phase IV of the hospital development (phases I-III are complete). The request
would extend the approvals granted from Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013, which granted
a seven-year vesting period. This request will be reviewed in accordance with Chapter
26.308.010.C, Extension or Reinstatement of Vested Property Rights.
City Council is the final review authority.
LOCATION/BACKGROUND:
The Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Plan approved a large-scale, multi-year project
involving significant expansions of the main hospital building, along with infrastructure
and campus improvements. The project was approved via City Council Resolution No. 3,
Series 2009, granting a total of 214,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area for development, which
anticipated as much as a 20-year build-out timeline for the hospital. The approval divided
construction into four phases. Phases I-III are complete. Phase IV has yet to begin and
is the subject of this application.
Phases III and IV received final approval simultaneously via Ordinance No. 6, Series
2013, which granted a seven-year vesting period (to expire on May 23, 2020). Phase IV
represents just four percent of the total project scope and is considered the smallest
phase of the development. 8,575 sq. ft. of floor area was approved for this phase; 1,854
sq. ft. of floor area is allocated to the basement and 6,721 sq. ft. is allocated to “Level
One”. The development consists of an outpatient clinic, a central registration area, a new
main entrance, AVH Foundation Offices, a chapel and a café expansion.
The Aspen Valley Hospital Expansion has been funded through a variety of mechanisms,
including a Hospital Taxing District mill levy and significant funding donations. To date,
approximately $148 million has been invested in the campus, and was allocated
accordingly to fund phases I through III. Phase III alone required an investment of $64.8
million.
For the completion of Phase IV to begin, additional fundraising is needed, which in turn
necessitates additional time. All other aspects of the Phase IV Aspen Valley Hospital
District Master Facilities Plan remain unchanged and no amendments are requested.
Phase IV will be constructed as approved by City Council Pursuant to Ordinance No. 6,
Series of 2013.
REQUEST:
The applicant requests a 5-year extension of vested rights. Approval of the request would
provide the applicant additional time for fundraising, to refine estimates and to evaluate
financial costs associated with initiating the final phase of construction. If a 5-year
extension is granted, vesting would extend until May 23
rd, 2025. If the extension request
is not granted and the applicant does not submit for a building permit within the
established vesting period, the existing approvals would expire on May 23
rd, 2020 and
further City review under new land use code standards would be required. An extension
of vested rights is a discretionary review by the City Council. Staff responses to the
required code criteria for an extension can be viewed in Exhibit A.
168
Page 3 of 3
STAFF FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION:Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request against the
relevant review criteria and finds the following:
Since Council approved Resolution No 3, Series 2009, project Phases I through III have
been completed. It is worth noting that Section 3 of the Council Resolution anticipated a
20-year timeline to complete the project, which would end extend to 2029. The applicant
posits that extending the vesting period to May 23
rd, 2025 (5-years) would provide
sufficient time to pursue additional funding and to refine estimates. With vesting for Phase
IV expiring on May 23rd, building permit submittal is imminent if an extension is not
granted.
Significant financial investments that have been made thus far in the hospital expansion.
The applicant has paid all applicable impact fees associated with the first three phases of
development and plans to pay all required fees associated with Phase IV. Staff
acknowledges the progress that has been made thus far on the project.
Phase IV consists of only four percent of the total floor area of the entire campus
development. Staff believes that a 5-year extension of vested rights would provide the
applicant enough time to raise the required funds to finish the project, while remaining
within the 20-year timeline that was anticipated in Resolution No. 3, Series 2009. Granting
the extension will provide a clear community benefit that will serve Aspen and the greater
Roaring Fork Valley.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends approval of the request for an Extension of
Vested Rights, finding that the application does comply with the applicable review criteria.
PROPOSED MOTION (WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE):“I move to approve Resolution No. 041,
Series of 2020 granting a five-year extension of vested property rights for Phase IV of the
Aspen Valley Hospital.”
Attachments:
Exhibit A – Staff Findings – Extension of Vested Rights
Exhibit B – Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009
Exhibit C – Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
Exhibit D – Application
Exhibit E – Affidavit of Public Notice
169
RESOLUTION NO. 041
(Series of 2020)
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN
EXTENSION OF THE VESTED RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 3 (SERIES OF 2009), PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2, SERIES 2013, ORDINANCE NO. 6 (SERIES OF 2013),
ASSOCIATED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RECEPTION
NO. 608884), TWO ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE APPROVALS (RECEPTION
NO. 622520 & RECEPTION NO. 633493) AND PHASE III & IV FINAL PLAT
(RECEPTION NO. 608883) FOR THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL 401 CASTLE
CREEK ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL
SUBDIVISION PARCEL C AND TRACK F, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,
PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO
Parcel No. 2735-123-07-801
WHEREAS,the Community Development Department received an application
from the Aspen Valley Hospital District (represented by Chris Bendon of BendonAdams,
LLC) for property located at 401 Castle Creek Road, requesting an extension of vested
rights for the previously approved Phase IV expansion; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted a request to extend the vested rights for
the property for a period of 5 years. Current vested rights for the subject property expire
on May 23rd, 2020; and,
WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 26.308.010 Vested Property Rights of the Land
Use Code, City Council may grant a reinstatement or extension of vested rights after a
public hearing is held and a resolution is adopted; and,
WHEREAS,the Community Development Director has reviewed the application
and finds that from the time of the adoption of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master
Facilities Plan, the Land Use Code has not been amended in such a way that it would
significantly or fundamentally change phase IV of the development from its current
vested approval; and, the Director recommends approval for a 5 year extension; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director further finds that the
Applicant has made significant progress and financial investment in completing Phases I-
III of the Aspen Valley Hospital Expansion; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the extension of
vested rights for Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan under
the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and
considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken
and considered public comment at a public hearing; and,
170
WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the extension of vested rights proposal
meets or exceeds all applicable land use standards and that approval of a 5- year extension
of vested rights meets regulatory requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary
for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ASPEN,
COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1:
The Aspen City Council does hereby approve an extension of the vested rights for Phase
IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan granted by City Council
Resolution No. 3 (Series of 2009), Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2
(Series of 2013), Ordinance No. 6, (Series of 2013), associated Planned Unit
Development Agreement (Reception No. 608884), two administrative land use approvals
(Reception No. 622520 & Reception 633493) and Phase III & IV Final Plat (Reception
No. 608883). Vesting for these approvals shall expire on May 23
rd, 2025 if the following
conditions are met:
A. That the reinstatement and extension herein of a vested property right shall not
preclude the applications or regulations which are general in nature and are
applicable to all property subject to land use regulation by the City of Aspen
including, but not limited to, building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical
codes, and all adopted impact fees that are in effect at the time of building permit,
unless an exemption therefrom is granted in writing.
B. Housing mitigation and required parking shall comply with Land Use Code
regulations in place at the time of the amendment submission.
C. If the above conditions are satisfied, vested rights shall expire on May 23
rd, 2025.
Section 2:
If the above conditions are not satisfied, vested rights shall expire on May 23rd, 2020.
Section 3:
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan
development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein,
unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 4:
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
171
Section 5:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Section 6:
A duly noticed public hearing on this Resolution was held on the 12
th day of May 2020 at
5:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
FINALLY, adopted, passed, and approved by a __ to ___ (X-X) vote on this 12
th day of
May2020.
Approved as to form: Approved as to content:
________________________________________________________
James R. True, City Attorney Torre, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
172
Exhibit A – Extension of Vested Rights Review Criteria
EXTENSION OR REINSTATEMENT OF VESTED RIGHTS REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
Section 26.308.010.C., Extension or Reinstatement of Vested Rights, of the City Land Use Code
provides that development applications for an extension of vested rights may be approved in
accordance with the following standards and requirements.
1. In reviewing a request for the extension or reinstatement of vested rights the City
Council shall consider, but not limited to, the following criteria:
a. The applicant’s compliance with any conditions requiring performance prior to
the date of application for extension or reinstatement;
Staff Finding:
The applicant has secured all required land use approvals for the final phase of
construction and, to date has fulfilled all conditions of the development order. Any
outstanding requirements identified in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and
Planned Unit Development Agreement will be fulfilled, as required. Any other
remaining matters are detailed issues typically addressed as part of the building permit
review or construction observation. Staff finds this criterion met.
b. The progress made in pursuing the project to date including the effort to obtain
any other permits, including a building permit, and the expenditures made by
the applicant in pursuing the project;
Staff Finding:
Approximately $148.8 million has been invested in the hospital expansion, bringing
phases I through III to completion. The significant financial investments that have been
made thus far support the case that substantial progress has been made. It is worth
noting that the Hospital Facilities Master Plan approved a total of 214,000 sq. ft. of
gross floor area, most of which has been built. Phase IV represents only 4 percent of
the total floor area for the entire campus development. Staff finds this criterion met.
c. The nature and extent of any benefits already received by the city as a result of
the project approval such as impact fees or land dedications;
Staff Finding:
The Applicant, thus far, has paid the costs associated with all land use reviews
associated with the project and has paid all applicable impact fees required for Phases
I through III. Any outstanding impact fees associated with Phase IV will be exacted at
the time of building permit submittal.Staff finds this criterion met.
d. The needs of the city and the applicant that would be served by the approval of
the extension or reinstatement request.
Staff Finding:
Granting this extension will serve the City of Aspen by providing additional time for the
full completion of the Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan, as approved by
City Council. Constructing Phase IV will complete the expansion of the hospital
facilities and will provide a clear community benefit that will serve Aspen and the
greater Roaring Fork Valley. Staff finds this criterion met.
173
2. An extension or reinstatement may be in the form of a written agreement duly
authorized and executed by the applicant and the City. Reasonable conditions may
be imposed by the City Council including, but not limited to, compliance with any
amendments to this Title adopted subsequent to the effective date of the
development order and associated vested rights.
Staff Finding:
Staff has included conditions requiring the applicant to comply with any applicable
regulations, including but not limited to building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical
codes, and all adopted impact fees that are in effect at the tim of building permit. Staff
finds this criterion met.
3. If the request is for reinstatement of a revoked development order, the City Council
shall determine the financial impacts of the investigation and may require the
applicant to pay the reasonable costs of investigation, enforcement and reporting
by City staff.
Staff Finding:
This is not a request for reinstatement of a revoked development order.
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
ORDINANCE NO. 6
SERIES OF 2013)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A
GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW,FINA
EASPENT,
AND VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS FO R PHASE III AND IV OF TH ON
VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT MASTER
SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY
PARCEL C,ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICTDESCRIBEDAS401CASTLECREEKROAD,CITY OF ASPEN,PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO.
Parcel ID: 2735-121-29-809
application from the
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department
b Leslie Lamont of Lamont Pla ing
Aspen Valley Hospital District (Applicant), represented y
Services, requesting
approval of a Final Development Plan
y Hospital District
Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Phase III and V of the Aspen Valle
Master Facilities Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Conceptual PUD approval (via Resolution No. 3, Series of 2009)
parking
conceptually
approved a redeveloped and expanded
n
multi-story
rcel C of
hospital pen Valley Hospital
garage, affordable housing and site improvements o
Subdivision,to be developed in four phases; and,
WHEREAS,the Community Development Department received referral comments from
City Engineering, Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department,Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the Transportation Department, and the City Utilities
Department as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and,
WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the
use reviews
Development Department
IV
reviewed the proposed Final PUD and assoc iated
recommending approval with conditions; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, Final PUD approval and
associated reviews may be granted by the City Council
oninduCommissaonubthe
hearing after
Community
considering
recommendations by the Planning g
Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and,
WHEREAS, prior to City Council approval, Final PUD and associated land use reviews
by the Planning and Zoning Commission requires a public hearing and this application was
reviewed at multiple public hearings wherewereheard; and,
of the Community
Development Director and comments from the public
2012 and
WHEREAS, during meetings on October
lssion opened a duly noticed public hearings toJanuary8, 2013, the Planning and Zoningconsidertheprojectandapprovedagrowth management quota system review and recommended
City Council approve the Final Planned Unit Development application and associated reviewsforPhaseIIIandIVbyasixtoone (6-1) vote, with the findings and conditions listed within
Resolution No. 2 (Series of 2013); and,
RECEPTION#: 600720, 06/28/2013 at
Cite
09:54:29 AM, Ordinance No.6,Sr
1 OF 64, R $326.00 Doc Code
Paz,
ORDINANCE
Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO
199
WHEREAS,once the land use approvals and recommendation
G
approval were gapproval,
the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Applicant requestedFinalPlannedUnitDevelopment (PUD) approval and Vested Property Rights approval of the City
Council; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application
approval,awiphlconditions of the proposed
Community Development Department re
Final PUD request and associated land use reviews; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 11, 2013, March 18, 2013,
April 8, 2013 and May 13, 2013, the City Council opened the hearing and review of the
application; and,
WHEREAS,the Aspen City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds
all the applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with
conditions; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance furthers and is necessary for the
promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS
FOLLOWS:
In approving this ordinance, the City Council recognizes and supports the Aspen ValleyHospital's aspiration and mission to assure access to health care and"to deliver extraordinary
healthcare in an environment of excellence,compassion,and trust."
Section 1: ApprovalsPursuanttotheprocedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
City Council hereby approves Growth Management Review for an Essential Public Facility,Final Planned Unit Development, and Vested Property Rights for Phase III and IV of the Aspen
Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan.
Specifically, these approvals permit the Applicant to develop Phase III and IV of a four phasemasterfacilitiesplaninclusiveof10,187 sq. ft. of net leasable commercial and office space forthedevelopmentofmedicalofficeswhichareconsideredaccessoryto, and part of the hospital
function as well as an expansion of the hospital facility as shown in Exhibit 1 of this ordinance.
These new improvements represent additional square feet to be constructed on the site and are
divided into two phases, with the associated gross square feet outlined below:
133,280
Phase IV
Basement 1,854
Level One 6,721
Level Two 0
Medical OSace
0
Ambulance 0
City Council
Ordinance No. 6,Series 2013
Page 2 of 11
200
Subtotal 74,440 8,575
Section 2: Dimensional Re uirements of Phase III and IVThefollowingapproveddimensionsoftheprojectshallbereflected in the Final PUD plans for
Phase III and IV:
FMinimum ot Size As represented on the Final PUD plans
ot Width
ront Yard
Side Yard
Minimum Rear Yard
Maximum Site Coverage
Minimum Distance between Buildings
Maximum Height
a. Hospital/Medical Office Space a. As noted by the spot elevations
depicted above grade on the "Overall
Roof Plan" as detailed in Exhibit 2 of
b. Other
this ordinance
b. Mechanical equipment as detailed in
Exhibit 3 of this ordinance may exceed
the requirements of the land use code.
All other structure shall meet the
requirements of the land use code.
New gross sq. ft. (including medical office 83,015 square feet*
space)
Maximum Net Leasable Commercial and 10,187 square feet
Office space (medical office)
Note: * Hospital gross square footage shall be measured from exterior wall to exterior wall,
inclusive of basements
Section 3• Voluntary Deed RestrictionTheApplicantagreestorecordadeed restriction prohibiting the condominiumization of the
10,187 sq. ft. medical office space approved for Phase III. The deed restriction shall be recordedpriortotheissuanceofaCertificateofOccupancyofthehospital/ medical office component of
the project.
Section 4: Design elements to be incorporated into Phase III and IVBaseduponrecommendationsofthePlanningCommission, City Council requires the following
be incorporated into the Final PUD approval.
A. Pedestrian Access. An additional pedestrian access way is incorporated into the site plan as
shown in Exhibit 4.
City Council
Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
Page 3 of 11
201
B. Lighting Plan. A lighting plan, as presented in Exhibit 5 of this ordinance shall be
implemented to provide remediation techniques for lighting that has been installed on the site as
well as the design of any additional outdoor lighting in Phases III and IV to minimize
undesirable brightness and light trespass. Any upper story on the hospital or medical office space
shall include automated window shades to limit the impact of indoor lighting.
C. Enhanced Landscaping. An enhanced landscape plan is approved as shown in Exhibit 6.
There are certain constraints on the landscape plan, most notably, a utility easement parallelingCastleCreekRoadthatislocatedonthehospital's property with a water main located within it.The plan commits to avoid the planting of trees within ten feet of the water service line. AllplantingswillbefieldlocatedwithrepresentativesfromtheParksandUtilitiesdepartment
present to provide final approval. Within this utility easement corridor, the hospital has agreed to
do a like replacement (not based upon the diameter or gallon size of the plant) of plantings in the
event the Utilities-department has to remove or cut down plantings for maintenance purposes.
This replace requirement shall be outlined in the PUD agreement. Additional landscaping
requirements are noted in section 13 of this ordinance.
D. Amended Lobby Design. As shown in Exhibit 1 of this ordinance, an amended lobby design
is approved for Phase IV of the project.
E. Mechanical Screening. Two mechanical units from Phase II and one mechanical unit from
Phase III are required to be wrapped in screening as shown in Exhibit 3 of this ordinance.
Section 5: Parking
The total number of parking spaces approved for the site as a whole, upon completion of Phase
IV shall be as follows:
219*
Parking Structure
77
Phase II New Surface Parking 5
New West Side Employee Parking
16
New main entry Parking 31
Surface at Whitcomb
2
Surface for Affordable housing 6
Tuck under for affordable housing
356
Notes:
10 parking spaces in the parking garage shall be reserved for the affordable housing unitsNotincludedinthistallyistheparkingfortheexistingambulancebarn, the proposed ambulance
garage and existing CEO residence.
Due to the phased construction of the project there will be more parking spaces available at the
end of Phase II construction than upon completion of Phase IV. Therefore 79 parking spacesshallbedecommissioneduntiltheissuanceofabuildingpermitforPhaseIIIisissued. In the
event that the Applicant does not undertake construction of Phase III within the vested rights
period for Phase 111, the hospital will be required to remove the 71 parking spaces located along
the western side of the hospital and detailed in Exhibit B of Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010).
Any existing paving in this area that is not necessary to use as a connection for the service loop
City Council
Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
Page 4 of 11
202
road shall be removed. Once the surface parking spaces are removed, the decommissioned
garage spaces may be used if a building permit for Phase III is not issued.
Section 6• Affordable Housing
A. Affordable Housing Credit Balance. As required by City Council Resolution No. 3 (Series of
2009), each phase of development shall verify the number of employees generated. An audit
within 1 year of a C.O. being issued for each phase of development is required to verify theprojectedandactualemployeegenerationoftheproject. The audit shall be conducted during the
hospital's high season of operation (winter) as agreed upon by the Applicant and APCHA. Any
difference between the audit and what was anticipated shall require the "Balance Available" to
be updated through an administrative approval.
B. Off-site Housing Requirement. Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010) requires the provision of off-
site affordable housing to house six(6)Full Time Equivalents (FTEs). The Applicant has asked that
this requirement be rescinded. As the existing credit and on-site housing for the campus meets the
land use code's affordable housing mitigation requirements, City Council hereby rescinds any off-
site affordable housing requirement.
Employees Employees Balance
Housed Generated Available
Beaumont, Mountain Oaks & CEO House 57 0
Credit(Council Resolution No. 3, 2009)
0
Phase I
Phase II 28.5 19.98
Phase II!
ofon-site
20.16
Phase IV
8.46
Total 85.5 48.6 36.9
The emp
affordable
to be mitigated for in Phases III and IV is the greater of two uses on the
site: Mece or the hospital function as permitted by the land use code with the
provisio housing. The audit will verify the employees generated by the
MOS in employees generated by the hospital function in Phases III and IV.
Section 7• Plat and Agreement
The Applicant shall record a subdivision/PUD plat and agreement that meets the requirements of
Land Use Code Section 26.445.070,Recording a Final PUD Development Plan,-within 180 days of- - -
approval by City Council.
Section 8• Building Permit Application
The building permit application shall include the following:
a. A copy of the final Ordinance and recorded P&Z Resolution.
b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set.
City Council
Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
Page 5 of l 1
203
c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District.
d. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil
Engineer, which meets adopted city standards.
e. An excavation stabilization plan, construction management plan (CMP), and drainage and
soils reports pursuant to the Building Department's requirements.
1) As part of the construction management plan for Phase III and IV improvements,
provisions shall be made to ensure that parking for Aspen Valley Hospital visitors, staff and
construction workers will be accommodated to prevent overflow in the Health and Human
Services lot.
f. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health
Department.
g. A detailed excavation plan for review and approval by the City Engineer.
h. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet adopted
building codes.
Section 9: Engineering
Final design and analysis for drainage shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the
Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit.
Section 10: Fire Mitigation
All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met per building permit. This
includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503),
approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907).
Section 11• Utilities Department RequirementsTheApplicantshallcomplywiththeCityofAspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, an d
with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of
the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department.
Section 12• Sanitation District Requirements
Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications,
which are on file at the District office at the time of construction. The applicant shall provide the
district with proper representation that will show all means and methods to preclude any and all
pathological, radioactive, heavy metals, and any other hazardous material on the list of EPA
prohibited toxic discharges.
Section 13: Parks
A. An approved tree permit will be required before any demolition or access infrastructure work
takes place. Please contact the City Forester at 920-5120. Mitigation for removals will be
City Council
Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
Page 6 of 11
204
paid cash in lieu or on site. The overall mitigation for removals during this phase of
improvements already has a carry-over from the construction of the Obstetrics Unit.
B. A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or
groupings of trees on site. The vegetation fence shall be installed at the edge of the
construction impact as depicted on page P101, Master Site Phasing Diagram. This fence
must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction
activities are to commence. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction
backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree
on site. There should be a location and standard for this fencing denoted on the plan.
C. General Landscaping notes:
Parks requests the opportunity to field locate all of the plantings proposed for Phases III
and IV. The areas proposed for new plantings are heavily planted with existing trees and
other landscaping. All new plantings must be planted appropriately in a manner that
doesn't jeopardize the health of existing trees and provides appropriate space for
projected mature growth.
D. Landscape Guarantee. The hospital shall be required to provide a landscape guarantee
adequate to assure completion of the enhanced landscape plan set forth in Exhibit 5 or
otherwise represented by applicant and for any incremental increase in landscaping approved
which is beyond the scope of the recorded Phase II landscape plan. The Parks department
may agree to a reduction in the standard amount of the landscape guarantee which shall bememorializedintherequiredimprovementsagreement. No building permit for Phase III or
IV will be issued until the guarantee is accepted by the Parks Department.
Section 14: Transportation
As noted in Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010), a Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
plan requires a traffic analysis to be completed every two years. For clarification purposes the
first traffic analysis shall be completed within 6 months of the Certificate of Occupancy being
issued for Phase 1I.
As part of the Conceptual PUD approval, AVH agreed to financially contribute to improvements
to the roundabout and Cemetery Lane intersections to improve capacity. The proportionate financial
contribution for capacity improvements to either of these two intersections is .3% (.003) of funds
the City of Aspen spends on the project(s.) As no projects have been identified, the Applicant will
be required to outline in the subdivision improvements agreement its ability to contribute to any
projects that occur to the two intersections within seven years of approval of this ordinance.
Section 15: Impact Fees
The Parks Development impact fee shall not be assessed on the hospital facilities for Phases III
and IV. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.610, Impact Fees, the Applicant shall pay a Parks
Development impact fee solely for the medical office space. The Transportation Demand
Management (TDM)/Air Quality impact fee for Phases III and IV has been waived. Any
applicable impact fees shall be assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and
paid at building permit issuance. The amount shall be calculated using the methodology and fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit submittal.City Council
Ordinance No.6, Series 2013
Page 7 of I 1
205
Section 16: School Lands Dedication Fee
As no residential development is proposed during Phases III and IV, a school lands dedication
fee shall not be assessed.
Section 17: Vested Rights
The development approvals granted pursuant to Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution
Number 2, Series of 2013 and herein shall be vested for a period of seven (7) years from the date
of issuance of the development order.
No later than fourteen (14) days following the final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to
obtain a development order as set forth in this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of
Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan
and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in
the following form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right,
pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado
Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Parcel C of the Aspen
Valley Hospital District Subdivision and commonly known as 401 Castle Creek Road,
City of Aspen, CO,by Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013, of the Aspen City Council.
Section 18: Cost and Financial Assurances
A. Proof of Financing. Before the issuance of a building permit for the development of either
Phase III or IV, and as a condition of such approval, Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide to the
City Building Department, Finance Director, and City Attorney for review and approval,
satisfactory evidence that Aspen Valley Hospital has in place sufficient financing to accomplish
and complete the construction of the development of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities
Plan, Phases III or IV covered by the building permit and any public improvements identified
within this SIA and required under this ordinance; provided, if there is no loan with respect to
development of Phases III or IV, then Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide a letter from a
financial institution stating that Aspen Valley Hospital has funds available in an amount that
covers the estimated cost of construction for the development of phases III or IV. Such
financing may include without limitation, a construction loan from an institutional lender or
lenders and equity capital investments and/or donations from Aspen Valley Hospital or third
party investors or contributors. In lieu of evidence of such requirements, the Aspen Valley
Hospital may provide a completion bond sufficient to complete the project. Such bond shall be
subject to the review and approval of City Building Department, Finance Director, and City
Attorney. In addition, before issuance of a building permit for Phases III or IV, Aspen Valley
Hospital shall provide supporting cost estimates for all improvements covered by the requested
building permit prepared by Aspen Valley Hospital's general contractor for review and approval
by the City of Aspen Building Department.
B. Cash Escrow for Site Enhancement Fund. Before the issuance of a building permit for Aspen
Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan Phases III or IV, and as a condition of such issuance, the
Aspen Valley Hospital will deposit with a title company the sum of ONE
HUNDREDTHOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO/100THS ($100,000.00) (the "Site
City Council
Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
Page 8 of 11
206
Enhancement Escrow Funds") in the form of cash or wired funds pursuant to an Escrow
Agreement made and entered into between Aspen Valley Hospital and the City which shall
provide as follows:
i. In the event construction work on the development of Aspen Valley Hospital Master
Facilities Plan, Phases III or IV shall cease for ninety (90) days or longer, prior to a final
inspection by the City of the work authorized by a foundation/structural frame permit
F/SFP") on said Parcel C, Aspen Valley Hospital District Subdivision, and cessation of
such construction work continues for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days after
notice from the City to Aspen Valley Hospital specifying the subject work in reasonable
detail, or if such breach cannot be cured reasonably within such one hundred twenty
120) day period and Aspen Valley Hospital fails to commence and proceed diligently to
cure such breach within a reasonable time period, then the City, in its reasonable
discretion, may draw upon the Site Enhancement Escrow Funds from time to time as
needed for the purposes of improving the appearance of any construction work not
already completed on the exterior of the Hospital Building only. This work may not in
any way impact the operation or access to the Hospital.
ii. The Site Enhancement Escrow Funds or any remaining balance thereof shall be returned
to Aspen Valley Hospital, upon completion by the City of a final inspection and issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases
III or IV or when otherwise agreed to by Owner of Aspen Valley Hospital and the City.
C. Cash Escrow for Site Protection. Before the issuance of a building permit for Aspen Valley
Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases III or IV, and as a condition of such issuance, the owner
of Aspen Valley Hospital will deposit with a title company the sum of ONE HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO/100THS ($100,000.00)("Escrow Funds") in the form of
cash or wired funds pursuant to an Escrow Agreement made and entered into between Aspen
Valley Hospital and the City which shall provide as follows:
i. In the event construction work on the development of Aspen Valley Hospital Master
Facilities Plan, Phases III or IV shall cease for sixty (60) days or longer ("Work
Sto_"), prior to a final inspection by the City of the work authorized by a
foundation/structural frame permit ("F/SFP") on such lot, and cessation of such
construction work continues for a period of thirty (30) days after notice from the City to
Aspen Valley Hospital specifying the subject work in reasonable detail, or if such breach
cannot be cured reasonably within such thirty(30) day period and Aspen Valley Hospital
fails to commence and proceed diligently to cure such breach within a reasonable time
period, then the City in its reasonable discretion may draw upon the Escrow Funds from
time to time as needed for the purposes of protecting and securing the construction site
and improvements thereon from damage by the elements and/or from trespass by
unauthorized persons, and for purposes of improving the site to a safe condition such that
it does not become an attractive nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to neighbors or other
persons. The work provided for in this paragraph shall only be permitted on the exterior
of the Hospital Building and this work may not in any way impact the operation or access
to the Hospital.
City Council
Ordinance No.6, Series 2013
Page 9 of 11
207
ii. Half of the Escrow Funds shall be returned to Aspen Valley Hospital upon completion by
the City of a final inspection of the work authorized by the Foundation/Structural Frame
Permit on the project. The balance of funds shall be returned to Aspen Valley Hospital
once exterior finishes to the building have been installed.
Section 19:
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development
proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before
the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plandevelopmentapprovalsandthesameshallbecompliedwithasiffullysetforthherein, unless
amended by an authorized entity.
Section 20:
This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 21:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reasonheldinvalidorunconstitutionalinacourtofcompetentjurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
The City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in
the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder.
Section 22:
A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held on the I I'h day of March, 2013, at a meeting of the
Aspen City Council commencing at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall,
Aspen, Colorado, a minimum of fifteen days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall
be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen.
INTRODUCED,READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council
of the City of Aspen on the
25th day of February, 2013.
Attest:
Kathryn S. I c ,Ci Clerk Michael C. Ireland,Mayor
FINALLY,adopted,passed and approved this day of -- 013.
Atte
i
Kathryn S.Ko ,City Clerk Mic ael C.Ire and,Mayor
City Council
Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013
Page 10 of 11
208
Approved as to form:
ames R.True,City Attorney
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1 —Site plan, floor plans, elevations, amended lobby entry
Exhibit 2—Roof plan, height detail
Exhibit 3- Mechanical plan, height detail, retrofitted screening for certain mechanical
Exhibit 4 - Amended pedestrian access
Exhibit 5 —Clanton and Associates, lighting plan
Exhibit 6—Enhanced landscape plan
City Council
Ordinance No.6, Series 2013
Page 11 of 11
209
EXHIBIT
1
AMENDED
LOBBY
ENTRY
210
ir
211
100WO
C E',SI II
E
f
L
Haery Inlernenanal Inc.
i 110161h Street Man,
i Su11e201,
De nve6CO80202.3219
r,•,•
720.9.8.0...
I
project
number I
711•
f
1 1 1121900
CASTLE CRE EK ROAD L N V A L
A S P
LAUSSTOPj-j O S P I T A
1 I DOOLITTLE DRIVE = 6
PEDESTRIAN
I PHASE 3 AND 4
1
1 1 l11 'SURFACE I I I 111111
1.;'
11
ADDITIONIEXPANSION
I PARKING r I
PARKING 111 11111 ! ! ' 1 r
STRUCTURE I 1 0401 Castle Creak Road
i ' 1 Aspen,C061611
I }O'SPI f'UILDIN-.
J
SHOY N AT FULL BUILD-OUT) 1
STORM WAT__ER - 1
2
Ty 1
E
i
agers
MNAGEMENT
consu!tanlscons cl"wrman
BASIN `
EMPLOYEE
w
1 - 1 l 1,HC dw DeiT
sr;a,i[wh,-111 Vi 645y'+I2
HOUSING
p
J jj1959Stgllf)l31)k)71
u W'a.EOE"17
3Q
q.Jy,7E00114105S7E'.11
LOADING r
q'EAEv-!v
DOCK p.., 1 I
r,
1,',-
ulou,+n:lynnr
e 1
Honran,+.s,rry
n,,,colJ l
1 1j111
I 1 k,*1,,[OgHL3 ill))ggJli)i1/7lEEN
1
N7/127J7J11})t tll Oct
a/
lr
S.hESwA^I
1 SURFACE SC34'i+SlSi<N
PARKING 1 q/J li-1 E11t 114iJT.1WU
1 f VYHITCOMB y BNTRY 1 1 seallsignature
1 TERRACE t.OB9Y 11
CEO
I
i-/ I t 1 1 R `I)
1
RESIDENCE j1
I 1 1
I NORDICTRAIL V ,^
I I I I
LT 1 1 1 t 1'
1
I Issued for
date
PHASE 314
FINAL PUD AUGUST 10,2012
1
LOApINO
AMBU
RAMP \I
lien)
date
TING
DOCK
AVH LOOP ROAD EXIS
d 11,teULANCE
I
BARN q
CASTLE CREEK ROAD_
Y
PLAI NORTH
DOOLI Q)RyNE
1196
1111 1K1NG. 11 = ! LEGEND
l
fill 11 f 111
IIII'
I1111I'I II -
PHASE
BUILDING NOTE:' iH15 SHEET IS PROVIDED TO
1 PHASE 1\ \
1
ILLUSTRATE THE VARIOUS PHASES OF
o
3 / t PHASE2
THE EXPANSION AND RENOVATION OF
1
PHASE 2 BUILDING ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL AND IS
sboetFUe
1J
it AS A DIAGRAMATIC
CEO
RESIDENCE I PHASE 3
REFERENCE ONLY.
MASTER SITE
L„ PHASE 3 BUILDING PHASING DIAGRAM
EMPLOYEE
HOUSING HOSPITAL
BUILDING EJ
1VHITCOMB SHOVIN AT FULL PHASE 4
TERRACE BUtLD•OUT)
I
PHASE 4
BUILDING
SITE DIAGRAM el)eel""'"`
t10TTOTOSC I P-101EXISTINGPHASELIA11TSf
HOSPITAL LIMITS OF
BUILDING DISTURBANCE
T,_.,L•„-_'...,.er..v-
n.-.+,",,,
i,,eY.e,e.sr•.....
c,•._,C.drC
u=i.
y,•
C•N"••sYi
drambv hcaa.r
ke b
PRE-PUD)e a,-::;.'r.6.x,..........
Fri,.•
AVHLOOPROAD
AMBULANCE
BARN y
212
I
design
LEGEND
GIRCULATION PUBLIC
LOADING I Heerytntemat'onallnc.F DOCK s
82016th Streetfdail,
CIRCULATION.STAFFIPATIENT Deaver,,C
NEYI BUILDING FOOTP WMEXPANSION
PARKING GARAGE
720.
94000
8ozoz•3219
2o.sas.o27s
CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINDRENOVATION rhL
prgednum er
J ELEVATOR:PUBLIC ii o 1121900
I")ELEVATOR:STAMPATIENT
EXTENT OF PHASE 1
I' 9
APPROVEDANDCOtdPLETEU
A S P G N V A L I P Y
EXTENTOFPIIASE2
I j POS I T A LVIN
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
EXTENT OF PHASE 3 PHA SE 3 AND 4
APPROVED AND CURREtULY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Y
0
NSION
EXIENTOFPHASE4
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION CasL'e Creek Road
i Aspen,Co 81011
f
i
J
I 1
consu'.lants7consWCl'on managers
i
3+:J E1.iUf+)A.t,=}!)
7111!]:•5`.c*
F7H
C08'.f7I
co
515111
riNl157:531
ttFRFr¢-e_T9 ti7)'eyfn g.
4'' . I
51:0'h'yP•_SS.'-i))
o,,,x.LO!!i:7
7Aar)5:011)?)/)
1ff71
X3127)1:011)1)+727:•:0
7 A'ilSl f.N7.1
I j hw:t CO
I LO s¢aVcgnaturo
0
I 11
MECHANICAL
issuedfor
dale
PHASE 314
t MEE' ING
oho
FINAL PLID AUGUST 10,2012
OBBY T ROO 1S
uern date
ngIIN RY I_
41AL. ---
R
LETINC
OOM
pLAN NORTH
SHELL SPACE
SCALE:V=:1
keYp?an
sheet 4l e
BASEMENT
LEVEL
she¢1 number
AF-10
YY ,..•,R•:<-..• •• dire nb9
checked b'
T•+a.W+fT+KFi'•JYrrl°"
lN.:!>f-a-mYS+AfYt
1fM jf<',4Y.ma
rJ
a,eY.
1 1.
1l+
f
v wn,onarnHr,Y.•7.,c
213
LEGEND
7—
i
CIRCULATION PUBLIC design
CIRCULATION STAFFIPATIE14T
NEVI BUILDING FOOTPRi.VTIEXPANSION
CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINTIRENOVATION Heery lntemationat Inc.
ELEVATOR-PUBLIC 02016th Street Matt,
Suite
ELEVATOR:STAFFIPATIENT r. Denver,Co 00202.3219
LOADING 720.948.0276EXTENTOFPHASEI0O°°e~
project number11APPROVEOANDC01,SPLETED CK
EXTENT OF PHASE 2 r 1121900
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
HI TEXTENTOFPHASE3 p
r— ASrr: N VALLGY
APPROVED AND CURRENILY UNDER CO:ISTRUCTION HEALING —
JEXTE14TOFPfME4LGARDEN H O S P I T A L
APPROVED AND CURREIITLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
S PPO T PHASE 3 AND 4
S RVIC
ADDITION/EXPANSION
i7-I N BIKE
T
C TRAIL
Cese Creek Road
AspAspen,Co 0116111
B 114 J YENS 0
a
CA
i I
1
IT r(I _
KI consu'lantslconstruction managers
EatL rCs+a;tebYS pv Derj.
a
3e,)E7rIWxA An.t7pp
C1bw
scsln l:`i
f J P D31YiISt5111»)»7Y.C1 S70*)(120/1710"3ES22
v
rr P eCfRbyt3hy G.1+.5+e•
Y
ZT
IT I-I _
tl Srr71Yco bX62
oYLn7
ww.
cowcllaN
R- ' COURT RD w: w.°unr
C.I__{_ I—_ 37)/11 ii:91177747t{,J—
c,I -gq7 e,.yyIt.t vi.al5aYA7
LOBBY ftii G6)r)
11
seaVstgnature
S
6 °
I
B CU ENTRANCE
BORATPW DROP-
V0
J -_
IC
f J V
S
NI
issued for date
AF PHASE 314
I
FINAL PLID AUGUST 10,2012
n v Item date
MBULANCE a
9
TR T l ` Y C AP
ARAGE&
r I
r
I '
LOBBY
f
DINING
O
EA -d
A
ROP OFF -
IEI C a r
LIC . 0
V
I • 1
IN ENTRANCE____PLAN NORTH
SCALE:1'=3ry•
0 l
D P THE T
DROP-OF --
kev Plan
sheet Otle
LEVEL ONE
6heet number
AF-101
T+Y:s+:.L'>tYl.rrir-i-.µY.s N-+wr/nw.• drann by checked by
ra'17v4 bf.c.c fry.+ O-YVrrlrrq•v-rsyshliY'•[+i-nt
yeJ•lanb.et ti--s Jn tec..vrut<v. y.../Y. •N>,vfr.O.' iIITJLtn 1[u.Slf ir'.Y
w/•s t.wW. ry r.TJ. , '.n T..sr7 +...rc
214
LEGEND design
CIRCULATION.PUBLIC
CIRCULATION STAFFIPATIENT
NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINDEXPANSION
HeeFy Intemaronal Inc.CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRNUREI:OVATIOlI
820 16th Street Mall,
ELEVATOR:-PUBLIC Suite 200,
ELEVATOR STAFFiPATIENT Denver,CO 80202.3219
720.946.0276
EXTENT OF PHASE 1 q O D 0 O
J
APPROVED AND COMPLETED
7 O o protect number
AEXTENT OF PI[ASE 2 1121900
APPROVEDAND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
r
aEXTENT OF PI-ASE 3 A S P E N V A L L f Y
APPROVEDAND CURRENTLY UNOE.RCONSTRUCTION
ROOF
6
EXTENT OF PHASE 4 0
H O S P I T A L
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
QJ PHASE 3 AND 4
CID
ROOF 64
b
ADDITION/EXPANSION
b
UVJ 0
0401 Cede Creek Road
Aspen,Co 81611
consullanlslcona ruction managers
O rJt FxlarjvlAw.WO NIIM'+$fuY k!
VN .ccWN9)!)))f t7 1109f)R.)Or1iN5flF'77
I COURTS
ncrhifn<..' 00-16v.
Aa w c'yo aioasaan
II, i I COURTYARD I I
r ... 7N71727h:Olr}!l r7275CJ 3i)F!)f JllU)U):sFl
11 I11=LI YARD _.I i h Er:rFeaanro
G!rwih,COlM)3
h seaVs[pnalure
MEDICAL
i OFFICE
i I SPACE
S
ROOF 1 /
Olem
Issued for date
I PHASE 3/4
FINAL PLID AUGUST 10,2012
Item date
i
ROOF
O--PF OPEN TO BELOW
cito
LO BY
HE4- AD
f'
t• --•
PLAN NORTH
L
I
SCALE:1'=3T
rr
key plan
sheet 09
LEVEL TWO
F.1 02
sheet number
drawn b Checked by
rT\rla.L4V<av'Wn\vr i,>w1.,•-n-(v+i r =
brL/f•1tiv••l wy,'Lr.w•i,VC.l..ayrla H!•Lai rp ,M1\b,t.r•vAti ya,YYn.W
L-J.I SnYT1n MS•.M•.wa\.e..,r:<N bryr"+••FT+• n, LI[r-iC d1Lw_Ll:•n}
215
design
Heery Internal:onal Inc.
82016th Slrocl R1all,
Suite 200.
Denver,CO 80202-3219
720.946.0276
project number
1121900
A S P E N VA L L E Y
F- i I I I I OH O S P I T A L
i Ii! t U f t ' III !. I I, I I I ' i PHASE 3 AND 4
ADDITION/EXPANSIOt
ti
OdOl Castle Creek Road
I
Aspen,Co 61611
NOTE:OXYCEN P ID SiRUGTU.SE UOT SHMW FOR CURRY
4 — 7
consuMans/conslruchon managers
Sholocc-uftl:c pF41 N,yi
X?)EtyEx,sgA.e,1)V )114x,6•,S.e.1"7
Gn.«,W)S,J) eb4v.Ye,G0617)
v13o))1'ARS)UA,tiI 113)o)b5>)fll?JS'.1r5M
EGErtFni uM7 a,
20 0+)3N'r-/Rs,,S):•1 )3U z+e St S.1 Vi
NORTH ELEVATION
V+
aGae)e:a
Ecya V{>'r_%V
aiv.ns,
s.Y,u
ax et..corxn
974
7u 03111 WO 7N 031)
Seal/Sl9nalure
Issued for data
PHASE 314
FINAL PUD AUGUST 10.2012
Item dale
r
y
IIIIIil,l I,( i II r n Ilr IT-II
F I I --M:f L -111Ij li
F'aj-F,
EAST ELEVATION
i SCALE I=20
kev o!an
JJ wheal title
NORTH
AND EAST
ELEVATIONS
sheet number
A-201
checked by
ny-,...,,,yrr•,=v,++,n•,•r,.:.uvr.,.ur+„ m:.cxi,.,n ...•e.,...nr...,.,
r•.w,.w.,.:,...-,.,.,.<...,rtrn+h•m, neme.rrw anr•arrr,r.:r!sr.,v
216
design
eery International Inc.
620 161h Street t'lall,
Suite 200•
Denver,CO 60202.3219
720.036.0276
protect number
1121900
S
F O SnP v1nT A
L L
t
PHASE 3 AND 4V. Illi'I . I _-`. --a r°[-- r - -t r r --r- r'
l
f , , :.1 _ _ 1- a
l
ADDITION/EXPANSIONNSION
0301 Casl:e Creek Road
TI Aspen,Co 81611
SOUTH ELEVATION J'( y-
ppp cosutlantslconslruc6on managers
r •— `r `
z n
Etcof,a-df
ill?-3 3':711)))M 5341 9%0 9575!2711973%)M2
ECEa f,ytcfJ GI'-5-.cw
V2)'W,.lFnJ.S.';r.'7
Cz-.c..CO f?251
Iv/ \ V , i142i/:C 11)37+221:•7 7:d1U5.':JlIYi3)))!`.:!
E:r'S E- Y.ir.7
S_2 V2:iFfS+YT7
h':lt6 CO
4:J?.-4 67111 1 P%97))7i4 Nt]
seaYskdnalure
I
Issued for date
PHASE 314
FINAL PUD AUGUST 10,2012.
iten dale
7t,amll ,
I'llll
rr
SCAtE:'3-1
WEST EL_ 1-.VATION sheet We
SOUTH
AND WEST
ELEVATIONS
sheet number
A-202
rr .-[,r.--...::,..-..,x:.:,<-,.-.,:>•Y..... dra'.vn by checked by
s r.. •- --..o..o- ..a.rWi.y,e.eirs
217
Phase 4 Lobby Redesign
EEE
n
I .
I
Original Design-Approved at Conceptual
20% EFFECTIVE BULK REDUCTION
40%EFFECTIVE GLASS,gEDUCTION
I 7_1711-
1 FT
IF
i-'
Proposed Redesign-Approved by Hospital Board
3
OR
218
G
ti 17 i8
I I 1
T.O.PARAPET 2
132'-0'
I
I I ROOF
I I
I
I I I I
T.O_HELIPAD i
121'-0' `p
I
T O.PARAPET 3
71T 0'
TO ET 114'-10'
Roof 1''..1_
114' 2'
I
I
I
I I
I
I m
I
LEVEL 01
i I
5
219
pammr,
w
imp
i
220
LEFT ELEVATION: CLADDING DETAIL
A
JOB
um T Warn
tlTemtrotTheChildren's Hospital
AHU-7-1 ZoosNAMEBehavioralHealthBuildingi_
2
AHU-7-1 SEB Pre
PO BOX 409 MARCHE, OK 73762 i OWMESR"M sav air+"a
CFM Company Pre
221
END VIEW: OUTSIDE AIR CLADDING DETAIL
L
RIGHT SIDE
EFT SIDE
IMT TAG A 75 DAME
OB — The Children's Hospital AHU-7-2 i Oct. 11, 2006
NA Behavioral Health Buildingto! DRMMG KO WP. ' fStOM
AHU-7-2 SE9 Pre
MPF&SWAnYE SNOB'ORDS N0,
PO BOX 409 OKARCHE, OK 73762 CFM Company Pre
222
LEGEND
CAFETERIA PATIO
I'
OUTDOOR CHAPEL TUMBLED CONCRETE PAVERS®z
CHAPEL GARDEN) i PERVIOUS PAVING)u
i;•'•'1 C SPECIALTY PAVING(INTEGRALk ': 1 a"Yr: tx- I. I! COLOR CONCRETE)
EASTERN
ENTRY coN ORL E
SURFACE PARKING CRUSHER FINES PAT,
MAIN
i PHASE 2
f I IMPROVEMENT)ENTRY f LANDSCAPE AREA
I ^ PHASE 3-4 APPROXIMATELIMIT'S OF DISTURBANCE
PUBLIC
SEE GRADING PLAN
MER
PUBLIC
f,EXCLUDES LIMITS OF
OM ENTRY a l ;y; .
t,
4
I,--- i INTERIOR RENOVATION)
ENTRY/CURBDIRECTIONAL RAMP K':.
r NOTE: THIS DIAGRAM IS16SURFACESIGNAGEMELDf_ F'' EXCERPTED FROM SHEET L-20PARKINGSPACESPAINTEDCROSSWALKTHEPHASE3/4 FINAL PUDAPPLICATIONSUBMITTALANDI
I
w f•
1 ILLUSTRATES PEDESTRIANIyCONNECTIVITYATFU
s IDE ALK
r.
LLVWIDECONCRETEOUT.
y k i WITH ADA CURB RAMP$
W Yr'
p
PAINTED CROSSWALK
LOOP ROAD
I9Ii
AVH SEROADE LOOP
rr
I
H.H.S.PARKING
iO `_,20 '40
Pedestrian access r evision
exhiZM.aFphses 3/4 KEY PLAN
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPIT P.
12 . 2012 2of2
223
ICJ
OUTDOOR DINING TERRACE GUAJA
SEE PCU ENTRY ALONI
ENLARGEMENT PLAN, LENGUPPESHEETL-1.3
RETAWALLCIVIL
STRU
j ENGINEER'S i
O r_'-} --__J DRAWINGS. lil
EXISTING I 1
IMPROVEMENTS SURFACE PARKING
TO REMAIN i PHASE 2
77 PARKING I MPROVEMENT)
SPACES
NOTE:
i I 1) THIS DIAGRAM IS
l EXCERPTED FROM SHEET
l L-1.0 OF THE PHASE 2
24 EXISTING 1 .,I! CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT
PARKING I SET.
SPACES TO I
REMAIN t PEDESTRIANAN CONNECTIVITY
DIAGRAM
CURB RAMP&SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS AS PROPOSED
EXISTING PAINTED CROSSWALK FOR COMPLETION WITH PHASE
HEUPAD I 2 CONSTRUCTION.
TO REMAIN 6 WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
WITH ADA CURB RAMPS
IRAWWATERCONNECTION
AND IRRIGATION PUMP I 1 JhiPAD: SEE IRRIGATIONPAINTED`- SHEET 11.2f. CROSS- ,.
AVH LOOP ROAD
WALK TRAIL STOP SIGN, SEE NOTES
REALIGNED HOSPITAREALIGNED L IGNEDPEDESTRIANENTRYROAD, SEE CIVIL 1 yTRAILSHEETCS-102
IMPROVED PEDESTRAIN
TRAIL CROSSING
TRAIL STOP SIGN. SEE NOTES
GUARD RAIL AT DOOU7TLE DRIVE 3 r(
GC
z8
REQUIRED AT CONCRETE RETAINING WALE ATER
220
I
y1'=40' THAN 30" IN HEIGHT AT HHS PARKING LOT AND NEW 1
0 —2040
RFTA STOP. SEE CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR TOW/BOW. o ti
70 DETERMINE EXTENTS OF-,GUARD RAIL COORDINATE ISTEELGUARDRAILINSTALLATIONWITHPREFABRICATED CASTLE CRESHELTERSTOENSURECOMPLIANCEWITHFALLIMPROVEMEN KEY PLANPROTECTIONCODES. SEE CI%pedestrian access revision exhibit- phase 2 SHEET CS-1-
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL M.F.P.
12 . 2012 1 of 2 224
MMLN&ASS
LIGHTING DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
Aspen Valley Hospital
Light Trespass Mitigation Options
The purpose of the Light Trespass Mitigation is to reduce the brightness of the lights for
neighbors. There are five different areas of concern: Whitcomb Terrace traffic circle area and
parking, hospital parking lot, hospital parking garage, wall mounted sconces and loop road.
Options to mitigate undesirable brightness and light trespass and AVH's intended resolution for
each area include:
1. Replacing the LED light bars with built-in shielding bars to reduce brightness of the
luminaire when viewed from off the site;
RESOLUTION:AVH will replace light bars at exterior pole and wall lights as
recommended.
2. Reduce LED light bar quantities in order to lower average lighting levels;
RESOLUTION:AVH will reduce the light bars from 3 to 2 at all remaining pole and wall
lights, pending new and final photometrics using the recommended light bars.
3. Change color temperature of the LED light bar to a warmer 2700K color;
RESOLUTION:AVH will change all light bars in pole-mounted lights to the
recommended 2700K color.
4. Install LED light bars in the wall sconces with backlight shielding to reduce the amount of
brightness on the wall;
RESOLUTION:AVH will replace the light bars as recommended.
5. Selectively identify and remove some poles and replace with lower height bollards;
RESOLTUION:AVH will selectively remove poles and replace with bollards,pending
new and final photometrics using recommended light bars.
6. Turn off lights that are not needed after a designated curfew;
RESOLUTION:AVH has already implemented lighting controls including motion
sensors, dimmers, and timers for the parking garage, the top level parking deck, and
the entry lobby.
tier n
1;P/
Figure 1—Black cover plate Figure 2—Spill light shielding on
reduces apparent bottom LEDs 225
i'
Aspen Valley Hospital—Lighting Design Ideas December 28,2012
Heery International
Page 12
2700K 3000K 4500K 6500K
High pressure Sodium Metal Halide[Quartz,Ceramic] Cold LED
2000K)I 6000-6500K]
Cooper LED LightBAR"[4000K]
s
Figure 3—The color appearance of various light sources can be defined
in terms of color temperature,measured in"degrees"Kelvin(K).The
Cooper Light Bar is the current specification.Recommend 2700K.
AccuLEDOptics-
5 Asymmetric Distributions
A—lyp.Z N ft+y lyw3 TW4 P_tejwM,
A—lyp.3 µ.
ms 5 Spill Light Eliminator
Distrilxitions s a s14 sie
su 3 Symmetric
Distributions
T
N wfis'.. lyw 5*N.. lyp,+S
Squaa.W.I.
14almn
f- Figure 4—The picture above compares the various light
distributions and spill light control
226
r t`
SLOPED
LY
OVERFRAMINIG
MEMBRANE
W/1
ROOF
PLYA£MBRANE
ROOFW/EXTRUDED RIBS
1,;.. r. xxi n,
ELEVATION i
r
SLOPED OVERFRAMING W/
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF II:I 'I I!!II!ill Lill!!; EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING W/ III;,,:. is i i I;! 4 ' -;2 SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/WI EXTRUDED RIBS
q.!'!I'I".
li:.,';' :
III
iii i I!1 i!IIIIIIIIIIIi!Iji!i!II:'::.{,.:,is
III! '..:.I' i I I EXTRUDEDR BSf 77
illi lillif it
d
lll!ir
ELEVATION Il:!ill ll.i Lllf!lil!iilll Illiil'i I I III III
1
18-0 AFG I I:
I,l..
lI
l
iIiIIi!:•:r
y'
T;.:j
R
I;Ii(,tI
I•ti"!`;
liIn
l!l
I'
r
I,
I;
I
f{
IIIi
aI,
I,li liIl'
i.
rULLl!;i
i'
i I
i iIt
I
f N
1-0 AEC)
II, I ITliI I fI
l EXIST.
NCOURTYARDCOURTYARD
ELEVATION
32'-0'AFG ti..
EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING W/
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/
rr
EXISTING
EXTRUDED RIBS SOLAR PANELS
I
I !......._.kr
I r
SLOPED OVERFRAMING W/SINGLEPLY
MEMBRANE ROOF W/EXTRUDED RIBS ArT l
ELEVATION
I
3T-e'AEG)
I I ELEVATION Ill..._
xa
I 32-0 AEG)
8 LOPED OVERFRAMNG WISINGLEFLY ...._.... _. .. ......_...
ADHERED TPO MEMBRANE ° ROOF W1 EXTRUDED RIBSMEMBRANERADHERED
ROOFING
ON/
TAPERED SKYLIGHT I#.• /
ELEVATION I I
1T-0'AFG EXIST. U. ... .. .. IEXIST.RTU
ELEVATION
10'4'AFG
QESAAG) ELEVATION ELEVATION I!F
O'AEGI .. (4.10-AEG)
1 ELEVATION
I
7,
SCREEN WALL II!,!I!I!IIIIII!I:I!.II':i:
Ili
ADHERED TPO MEMBRANE
ROOFINGW/TAPEREDELEVATIONNEWRTU
AFG GETAT Q i 1/INSULATION
i6'-0'AEG) OOFlNG'// I i
i......._...
r _IIN(ELEVATIONi
I 16'-0'AFG
ELEVATION ADHEREDTPO
T-6'AFG EGETATIVE
6'-0'AEG) OOFlN/ ! !.a....!._..i_..-!__L.......-L....l...l/{' ..........................._.......... TAPERED
N/ ./INSUUIDO 2 AFGNEIEVATIONI1
I 1
HELIPAD RAMP
6b'AFG I L....r. _:2ELEVATIONHELIPADa........
HELIPAD SAFETY NET i ELEVATION
ELEVATION i i 15'-6'AFG ELEVATION
5'-0'AFG ELEVATION ji --
1... ADHERED TPO MEMBRANE 16'-0'AEG
14-10 AF
6'-0'AEG)
ELEVA ION I (ROOFING W/TAPERED' 15'-6-AEG)
4'-0'AEG
d INSULATION. ELEVATION
iV
HELIPAD ELEVATION
33-4-AEG)
ELEVATIONAFG
16'-0-AEG) 24'-0'AFG
21'-0'AEG)
HELIPAD SAFETY NET j•
ELEVATION
17'E'AFG
ELEVATION
13b-AEG)
13'-6'AFG
7'-0'AEG)
ELEVATION
16'-6'AFG
6'-0-AEG)
227
END VIEW: OUTSIDE AIR CLADDING DETAIL
LEFT SIDE
p
RIGHT SIDE
JOB
UNT TAG PR NTS DATE
Te m t X01
The Children's Hospital
AHU-7-2NAME _Bshoviorol Heolth Building opt. T, Zoos
MUMMG NO WP. PURCHAW ORUEA NO
AHU-7-2 SEB Pre
PO BOX 409 OKARCHE, OK 73762 REPRESENWIVF SWW OFWM NOy—CFM Company Pre
228
M
G
design
1
KG,HI,;iM1.xl NN4
uto 000.
T:O.'a00TC
1121900
ASPEN VALLEY
HOSPITAL
PHASE 3
ADDITION/EXPANSION
o.M.
CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS a.x my
a.<
w•... j worearawrro,
t
PHASE 2
PHASE3
v I- t PHASE4
hv
if
LEGEND
m nose nw..+avr•uaas r,s
C[[iC/nT10M Yd NO•AEOK IM14NpIN00
p,'rnCWnm,L OOSTIIOOM OE
4 n1n
NM+tl14
OVERALL ROOF
PLAN
PUD229
MM
0
SLOPED OVERFRAMING W/
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE
ROOF W/EXTRUDED RIBS
HT ABOVE ROOF 6"
SLOPED OVERFRAMING W/i
tI
J I I+!{{I; )++"SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF
WI EXTRUDED RIBS
I
1 t I I,+I It fl EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING W/f
I I ,
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/
i'.:
j
EXTRUDED RIBS
lN
I
f)i , , I ill i.-I,I I(• I: ,;
t f
F EXIST
jj i
l COURTYARD
EXIST.COU1411 !!Ilf
J
i i IV COURTYARD
EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMINGW/. 7
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/
EXTRUDED RIBSY
JL 34-0"
L 34'-T r
HT ABOVE ROOF T-6"
l
HT ABOVE ROOF 10'-6' SLOG OVERFRAMING W/SINGLE-PLY
MEMBRANE ROOF W/EXTRUDED RIBS
ADHERED TPO MEMBRANE
ROOFING Wl TAPERED
INSULATION SLOPED OVERFRAMING W/SINGLE-PLY
MEMBRANE ROOF W/EXTRUDED RIBS
40'-("
SKYLIGHT
HT ABOVE ROOF 10 6
REPLACED RTU '
i
ELEVATION
j. 14'-0'AEG)
Ilill1
f' "ILA
SCREEN WALL
ELEVATION 1 .
16'-6'AFG
GETS6'-0'AEG)
1
HT ABOVE ROOF 1a-6'
GETATI
OOFING/
HELIPAD
230
EXHIBIT 3 THREE ROOF TOP UNITS TO BE SCREENED
MM
design
am.,,cornmaswe ° Tm.wenas
waoa.mb.
fiyf JOp
rtA.•aw r
e Sop 4 1 v A 4 c e r
S..P_f 7 A 1.
PHASE 3 AND 4tea`
ADDITION/EXPANS70N
Me as
00
aW
s
n,quw
4"wtp'up
WeWe
BReaau
iiv'.
o
T.
aA.-;" —• .. FINAL Pt/0 wcvano mu
ai+a"r
or
n.ew
a/AM7KCRTH
LEGEND x
e nr.iar.ae,ma issnom
ROOF
PLAN
AF-103
231
m
CLADDING
DETAIL
I
i
I
w
I
I l
I
emtr0
T
PO
8OX
409
OKARCHE,
OK
73762
232
r--
CLADDING
DETAIL
m x W
I
I
Tem
tro /
PO
BOX
409
OKARCHE,
OK
73762
233
Aspen Valley Hospital—Lighting Design Ideas December 28,2012
Heery International Page 1 3
Specific Mitigation Ideas and AVH's Intended Resolution
1. Whitcomb Terrace
The pole mounted luminaires on this property have the greatest visibility to properties and street below.
So, lowering the height of the luminaires will make the greatest impact by reducing visual line of site
from the property to the offending luminaire. Mitigation options and AVH's intended resolution,
pending new and final photometrics include:
Remove some or all luminaires, poles and bases at the traffic circle;
Replace some or all light poles with round bollards with fully shielded bollard without louvers;
Review additional landscape and exterior architectural lighting;
Fully shielded bollard alternate Current exterior lighting
2. Hospital Parking Lot
The hospital parking lot has 12-foot high poles with LED luminaires. Mitigation options and AVH's
intended resolution include:
Replace LED light bars in parking lot luminaire with 2700K LED bars with Type III distribution and
spill light control;
Use black finish light bar cover;
Reduce the number of light bars from 3 to 2, pending new and final photometrics.
234
Aspen Valley Hospital—Lighting Design Ideas December 28,2012
Heery International
Page 4
2700K LED color temperature with spill light
shielding on right pole
3. Hospital Parking Garage
The parking garage LED lighting is currently controlled with motion sensors that switch from a low light
level to high as people walk or drive near.Since some of the lighting is visible off site, below are
mitigation ideas and AVH's intended resolution:
Turn off upper deck pole mounted luminaires at a designated curfew as an additional control
step beyond the motion sensors already installed;.
Use black finish light bar cover to control luminaire brightness where light bars are being
replaced as recommended on the top deck only;
Shield perimeter mounted interior garage lighting with permanent shields at fixture locations
which are fully visible to the exterior;
Shielding demo for garage light
Install a permanent mesh fabric at openings at the perimeter to reduce garage luminaire
brightness.
235
Aspen Valley Hospital—Lighting Design Ideas December 28,2012
Heery International
Page 15
4. Rear Loop Drive
Navigation on the service loop road can easily be accomplished with lower height bollards. Mitigation
options and AVH's intended resolution include:
Install non-louvered bollards at each location previously planned to receive vertical light poles.
5. Hospital Wall Sconces
The wall sconces have similar issues as the parking lot lighting, such as color and brightness and should
be included in the overall mitigation effort. Options for mitigation and AVH's intended resolution
include:
Replace light bars with 2700K LED and spill light control bars;
Use black finish light bar cover;
Sconces on the east wall have been disconnected.Sconces at the stair wells will be retrofitted.
236
Aspen Valley Hospital—Lighting Design Ideas December 28,2012
Heery International Page 1 6
Future Lighting Design Strategies for Phases III and IV
There are many human factors related to lighting in the built environment. These factors will be the
primary drivers of the lighting design for the Hospital in order to deliver a high quality visual
environment, increased occupant comfort, and foster wellness and productivity. A successful electric
lighting design will provide a system of lighting layers (ambient, task, and accent) which respond to the
needs of the occupants. This strategy is particularly effective in energy-aggressive, high performance
buildings. Separating lighting into layers will increase visual comfort, provide additional flexibility, and
create visual interest.
Additionally,exterior and lobby interior lighting design will be designed consistent with the principles of
minimizing light trespass and brightness to the neighborhood.
Exterior
Specify 2700K light sources;
Specify Type III distribution with spill light control for pole-mounted luminaires;;
Use retaining walls and other hardscape features as lighted elements(face towards building);
Use fully shielded bollards without louvers;
Minimize use of poles in general. When used,specify 2700K LED light bars with built-in shielding
as recommended above;
Specify wall sconces with deeply regressed light sources; and
Provide dimming for all lighting and establish a nighttime schedule with automated controls.
Use low lumen (light)output luminaires for reduced brightness and minimum acceptable safe
light levels(footcandles).
The success of most lighting designs lies in the selection of the correct equipment. Luminaires are built
differently in order to optimize specific performance characteristics for which they are applied.Selecting
luminaires cannot be done on aesthetics alone, but must also consider photometric performance,
energy use,and project goals.
Interior Lobby
Specify 2700K light sources;
Specify only non-luminous or non "glowing" luminaires;
Use luminaires with fully shielded light sources;
Do not allow direct illumination through exterior windows;
Provide a low mounting height layer of light such as step lights,and wall washing(below 8');
Light between windows such that lighted surfaces are not reflected out the windows;and
Provide dimming for all lighting and establish a nighttime schedule with automated controls.
Tune (set) minimum acceptable lighting(footcandle)levels.
If ceiling is lighted,aim lights towards interior and either turn off or dim the lights to a low level
at night.
237
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL - PHASE 3 & 4 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE
TYPE DESCRIPTION SOURCE MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER
EBN7 GRADE MOUNTED SOLID STATE CUTTOFF BOLLARD WITH 2700°K LED
CANTILEVERED LUMINAIRE, TYPE IV DISTRIBUTION,DIMMABLE 50,000 HR per LM79
WITH ELV TYPE LINE VOLT DIMMER,MATTE BLACK BAKED ENAMEL >70 CRI LUMIERE 303-B1-LEDB2-2700-UNV-T4-DIMELV-BK-36FINISH,36"HEIGHT,UNIVERSAL VOLTAGE,MODIFIED WITH SINGLE Driver:MODIFIED:OUTBOARD LIGHTBAR ONLYLEDLIGHTBAROUTBOARDPOSITION. 0.9 PF
20%THD
EBN2 SAME AS TYPE EBN1,EXCEPT TYPE II DISTRIBUTION
SAME AS TYPE EBN2 LUMIERE 303-B1-LEDB2-2700-UNV-T2-DIMELV-BK-36
EPN4 POLE MOUNTED SOLID STATE AREA LUMINIRE,TWO TYPE IV SPILL 2700°K LED
MODIFIED:OUTBOARD LIGHTBAR ONLY
LIGHT CONTROL DISTRIBUTION BARS WITH LIGHTBAR COVERPLATE 50,000 HR per LM79
FINISHED BLACK,NOMINAL 13 X 23 X 6"CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING, >70 CRI
INVUE VXS-B02-LED-E1-SL4-BK-2700KBAKEDBLACKENAMELFINISH,IP 66,5 YEAR WARRANTY.SUPPLY Driver:
WITH ROUND STRAIGHT POLE,ARM AND BOLT COVER FOR 12' ?0.9 PF
MOUNTING HEIGHT. s 20%THD
EPNL SAME AS TYPE EPN4,EXCEPT LEFT SPILL LIGHT ELLIMINATOR
DISTRIBUTION SAME AS TYPE EPN4 INVUE VXS-B02-LED-EI-SLL-BK-2700K
EPNR SAME AS TYPE EPN4,EXCEPT RIGHT SPILL LIGHT ELLIMINATOR
DISTRIBUTION SAME AS TYPE EPN4 INVUE VXS-B02-LED-EI-SLR-BK-2700K
EWN7
WALL RECESSED LED STEPLIGHT,FULL CUT-OFF LONG THROW
DISTRIBUTION,12"X5"ALUMINUM FACEPLATE,BAKED BLACK
2700°K LED
ENAMEL FINISH,INTEGRAL 0-10V DIMMING DRIVER,MODIFIED WITH
50,000 HR per LM79
WINONA LED-STEP13-9-L-27K-ND120-SGB-WL-
Driver:MOD:FACEPLATE 216751
TEMPERED GLASS LENS AND TAMPER RESISTANT FASTENING >70 CRI
HARDWARE,SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS,5 YEAR FULL
z 0 9 PF MOD:TAMPER RESISTANT
WARRANTY,FOR POURED-IN-PLACE CONCRETE INSTALLATION(SEE
20%THDCUTSHEETFORJ-BOX REQUIREMENTS)
IA
XICATO
RECESSED SOLID STATE ACCENT LIGHT,NOMINAL 6"DIAMETER REMOTE PHOSPHOR LED
SEMI-SPECULAR CLEAR SELF FLANGED CONE,INTEGRAL 2700°K,80 CRI KURT VERSEN A5145-27-SS
ELECTRONIC 0-10 VOLT DIMMING DRIVER.5 YEAR WARRANTY. 50,000 HOURS AT 70%
LUMEN MAINTENANCE
IC
SURFACE MOUNTED LINEAR SOLID STATE COVE UPLIGHT WITH
2700°K LED
ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION,MCP @ 110°FROM NORMAL,,NOMINAL
50,000 HR per LM79
6"X 2"H,FOR CONTINUOUS RUNS,LENGTHS AS SHOWN ON PLANS, >
80 CRI
INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC 0-10 VOLT DIMMING DRIVER.5 YEAR
Driver:WINONA SCV1-SLC-LEDI-X-27K-DM24V-P1-RA-X-STD
0.9 PFWARRANTY.
5 20%THD
ID
XICATO
RECESSED SOLID STATE DOWN LIGHT,NOMINAL 6"DIAMETER SEMI- REMOTE PHOSPHOR LED
SPECULAR CLEAR SELF FLANGED CONE,INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC 0- 2700°K,80 CRI KURT VERSEN A4134-27-SS
10 VOLT DIMMING DRIVER.5 YEAR WARRANTY. 50,000 HOURS AT 70%
LUMEN MAINTENANCE
IG 2700°K LED
RECESSED LINEAR SOLID STATE WALL GRAZING LUMINAIRE,50,000 HR per LM79
NOMINAL 6"WIDE APERTURE,LENGTHS AS SHOWN ON PLAN, >80 CRI
LITECONTROL WS-L60-X-MO-27K-CWM-DP-D10-V-LCDSOURCEMASKINGDEVISETOAVOIDVIEWOFLEDS, INTEGRAL Driver:
ELECTRONIC 0-10 VOLT DIMMING DRIVER.5 YEAR WARRANTY. z 0.9 PF
20%THD
IS SURFAC MOUNTED SOLID STATE UPLIGHT,TWO ASYMMETRIC 2700°K LED
FORWARD THROW LED LIGHT BARS,NOMINAL 12"DEEP X 14"WIDE 50,000 HR per LM79
X 4"HIGH ALUMINUM HOUSING,COLOR TO BE SELECTED,INTEGRAL >80 CRI AMETRIX WL-IN-N-B02-AI-27-UNV-TBD-D10
0-10V DIMMING DRIVER,MODIFIED MOUNTING TO ALUMINUM Driver:MOD:MOUNTING,2700K,SHIELDS,2 BARSWINDOWMULLION,MODIFIED WITH BACKLIGHT GLARE SHIELDS.5 >-0.9 PF
YEAR WARRANTY. 20%THD
238
DESCRIPTION lumiere
Eon 303-B1 and 303-B2 are compact,low profile,dimmable,LED
bollards that provide downlight only via a fixed head. 303-61 has JASPENasingleheadonesideoftheluminaireand -82 has two,
VALLEY HOSPITAL B Nintegratedheaddscomingoffoppositesidesoftheheluminaire. 303-B1
and 303-B2 come standard with universal input LED drivers(120-
277V,50/60 Hz).Dimming is achieved with a standard ELV,reverse
phase dimming driver. Eon fixtures may be used indoors or outdoors
and carry an IP66 rating. Our patented LumaLevelTM leveling system
provides quick installation,easy adjustment,secure mounting and
protection from vibration.
SPECIFICATION FEATURES
A...Material C...Lens F...Electrical
Head is precision-machined from Clear,tempered glass lens,fac-
corrosion-resistant 6061-T6 alumi- tory sealed with high temperature Both models come standard with
num. Body is extruded aluminum and adhesive to prevent water intrusion universal input LED drivers(120-277,
mounting base is cast from corrosion and breakage due to thermal shock. 50/60Hz).The standard driver is ELV
resistant silicone aluminum alloy.
EDGE LIT option:when specified reverse phase dimmable. ref
with the EDGE option,the glass will
i
B Finish
LED xjbeslightlythicker,clear,tempered G...
and sealed in the same manner LEDs are included and available inFixtureandmountingbaseare
referenced above.The added glass three color temperatures(2700K,double protected by a RoHS compli- thickness will offer a brigher line of 3000K&4000K)and a variety ofantchemicalfilmundercoatingandlightaroundtheedgeoftheglassthatoptics. Both color temperature andpolyesterpowdercoatpaintfinish, will accentuate the fixture's aesthetics distribution must be specified whensurpassingtherigorousdemandsofandstyling. ordering-see reverse side for detailstheoutdoorenvironment. Mounting and catalog logic. 303-61 comesbaseispaintedblack. Fixture housing D...Adjustable Mounting Base
standard with two mini lightbars and v,and head are available in a variety Cast aluminum mounting base is
303-62 comes standard with four
of standard colors. In addition to equipped with the patented Luma- mini lightbars.the standard five colors offered by LeveITM leveling system that includes
Lumiere,the Eon bollards are also mounting chassis,70 shore neoprene H...Labels&Approvals
available in colors to match other out- base,stainless steel hardware and UL and cUL listed,standard wet label.
door Cooper brands,such as Invue. 3/4"conduit entry. It provides quick IP66 rated.
See the Finish section in the ordering installation,easy adjustment,secure
ED["'1detailformoreinformation. mounting and protection from vibra-
tion.
E...Hardware I...Warranty
303-B 1 / 303-B2
Stainless steel hardware is standard Lumiere warrants it's fixtures against
to provide maximum corrosion-defects in materials&workmanship
resistance. for five(5)years. Auxiliary equipment
such as transformers,ballasts and LED 15.5 W LED
drivers carry the original manufac- 31 W LED
turer's warranty.
LED
303-B1 303-132
BOLLARD
0 0 0 0
7.72" 12.70"
196mm 323mm
1.40" 1 40
35mm 35mm
24.00"24.00" - - -
609mm 609mm
36.00" 36.00"
914mm 914mm
3.43" 3
87mm 139mm 87mm 139mm
COOPER Lighting Specification and Dimensions subject to change without notice.
www.cooperlighting.com Consult your representative for additional options and finishes.
239
LED INFORMATION
LED Watts Distribution Total Lumens CRI oK Life(hrs.) Volts
LED132-2700-T2 15.5 Type II-Lateral Throw 725 95 2700 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LED132-2700-T4 15.5 Type IV-Forward Throw 709 85 2700 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LEDB2-2700-T5X 15.5 Type V-Flood 626 65 2700 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LED132-3000-T2 15.5 Type II-Lateral Throw 95 3000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LED82-3000-T4 15.5 Type IV-Forward Throw 85 3000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LED132-3000-T5X 15.5 Type V-Flood 65 3000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LED82-4000-T2 15.5 Type II-Lateral Throw 1209 95 4000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LEDB2-4000-T4 15.5 Type IV-Forward Throw 1181 85 4000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LEDB2-4000-T5X 15.5 Type V-Flood 1044 65 4000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LED134-2700-T2 31 Type II-Lateral Throw 1436 95 2700 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LEDB4-2700-T4 31 Type IV-Forward Throw 1410 85 2700 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LEDB4-2700-T5X 31 Type V-Flood 1247 65 2700 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LEDB4-3000-T2 31 Type II-Lateral Throw 95 3000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LEDB4-3000-T4 31 Type IV-Forward Throw 85 3000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LED134-3000-T5X 31 Type V-Flood 65 3000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LED134-4000-T2 31 Type II-Lateral Throw 2393 95 4000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LED134-4000-T4 31 Type IV-Forward Throw 2350 85 4000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
LEDB4-4000-T5X 31 Type V-Flood 2078 65 4000 50000 Universal Input(120-277V,50/601-1z)
NOTES AND FORUMULAS
Apply appropriate light loss factors where necessary.
Photometry is LM-79 compliant.
ORDERING INFORMATION
Sample Number: 303-B1-LEDB1-3000-UNV-T2-BZ
Series Color Temperature Optics
Finish
Height
Options
303-Bt= LED single head bollard 2700= 2700K - - TB=Tvoe II.Lateral Throw - - -24=24"Height-EDGE=Edgelit Clear
3000= 3000K T4=Type IV,Forward Throw Tempered
T5X=Type V,Extra Wide Flood Painted 36=36"Height Glass Lens
303-B2= LED dual head bollard 4000= 4000K BK =Black
Consult factory for other optics
BZ =Bronze
Input Voltage
UNV= Universal 120-277V, CS =City Silver
Dimming VE =Verde
Quantity f Mini Li htbars
50/60Hz
Y 9 DIMELV=Trailing Edge Phase WT=White
LEDB2= Light Emitting Diode, Dimming Driver
AP =Grey(Invue)
Rev B.,Two Mini Lightbar(131 only)
DP =Dark Platinum(Invue)
LED84= Light Emitting Diode,
GM=Graphite Metallic(Invue)
Rev B.,Four Mini Lightbars(B2 only)
MODIFIED: REMOVE INBOARD LIGHT BAR
WORM Lighting Specification and Dimensions subject to change without notice.
www.cooperlighting.com Consult your representative for additional options and finishes.
240
DESCRIPTION N V U E O
energy
The classic lines and sophisticated construction of Vision Site LED makes
it an ideal complement to site design.Offering LED technology across the JJASPENVXSandVXM,Vision provides true family scaling in both physical form E P Nandlumencapabilityforarchitecturalsitelightingapplications.UL/cUL VALLEY HOSPITAL
listed for use in wet locations.
SPECIFICATION FEATURES
Construction maintenance,offered standard or wall surface.STRUCTURAL
HOUSING:Heavy wall one-piece, in 4000°K(+/-275K)CCT and MOUNT:Die-cast aluminum cleat
die-cast aluminum housing has nominal 70 CRI.Optional factory- factory mounted to luminaire
precise tolerance control and set optic rotation[L90 or R901 and finished in luminaire color.
repeatability in manufacturing.allows uniform product orientation Stainless steel structural rod
Housing features a partition wall on site,independent of optical measures 112"in diameter and
that isolates driver components orientation. is provided in luminaire finish
for cooler operation.Integral color or optional natural finish.
aluminum heat sink provides Electrical Product works in conjunction
superior thermal heat transfer DRIVER:LED drivers are potted and with dedicated accessory arms
in+40°C ambient environments. heat sunk for optimal performance (order seperately).Invue poles
DOOR:One-piece,die-cast and prolonged life.Standard are provided pre-drilled when
aluminum construction with tool- drivers feature electronic universal structural mount option drill
less release latch.Door swings voltage(120-277V/50-60hz),greater pattern is specified.See Invue
down and is retained on two(2) than 0.9 power factor,less than poles section for complete VXS VISION SITEcatchhinges.GASKET:Continuous 20%harmonic distortion and selection.Additional mounting
SMALL LE
E
gasket provided to seal housing to feature ambient temperature range accessories available.
optic tray.LENS:Downlight lens is of+40°C(104°F)down to minimum
LED board integrated acrylic over- starting temperature of-30°C Finish
optics,each individually sealed for (-22°F).Shipped standard with Housing is finished in 5 stage 1-4 LightBARS
IP66 rating.HARDWARE:Tool-less Cooper Lighting proprietary circuit super premium TGIC polyester Solid State LED
release door latch is stainless steel/ module designed to withstand powder coat paint,2.5 mil nominal
aluminum construction,painted to 10kV of transient line surge.All thickness for superior protection
match housing and allows access LED LightBARS'" and drivers are against fade and wear.LightBART""
ARCHITECTURAL AREA/SITEtointernalhousingandelectricalmountedtodedicatedmountingcoverplatesarestandardwhiteLUMINAIRE
components. trays and are easily replaced by and may be specified to match
use of quick disconnects for ease finish of luminaire housing.
Optics of wiring.Driver tray is hinged Standard colors include black,
DISTRIBUTION:Choice of and removable without the use bronze,grey,white,dark platinum
thirteen(13)patented,high of tools.Options to control light and graphite metallic.RAL and
efficiency AccuLED OptiCST"",
levels,energy savings and egress custom color matches available.D E S 1 6 N 16 N T Sfeaturingdesignsthatmaximizecapabilities(battery pack and Consult Outdoor Architectural C O N S O R T I U M
light collection and directional separate circuit)are available.Colors brochure for a complete
distribution onto the application
selection.
region.Each optical lens is Mounting
precision manufactured via ARM:One-piece extruded Warranty
injection-molding then precisely aluminum arm available in VXS LED features a 5 year limited
arranged and sealed on the board standard 5"lengths.Internal bolts warranty.
media.LEDs:High output LEDs, guides allow easy positioning of
50,000+hours life at>70%lumen fixture during installation to pole UUULILisListed
CERTIFICATION DATA
ISO 9001
IP66 LightBARS
ARRA Compliant
LM79/LM80 Compliant
1.5G Vibration Tested
ENERGY DATA
DIMENSIONS Electronic LED Driver
0.9 Power Factor
20%Total Harmonic Distortion
120-277V/50&60hz,347V/60hz,
6" 480V/60hz
152,nm] 30°C Minimum Temperature
40°C Ambient Temperature Rating
EPA
13 1/2"1343mm] I 23"[584mm] Effective Projected Area:(Sq.Ft.)
Single:—1.18 Warm included
5"[127mm]
Single Structural:—1.27 Warm included
SHIPPING DATA
Approximate)
Net Weight:35 lbs.
Volume(cu.ft):3.00
1I.
NI/
1
00 T
COOPER Lighting AVU092101
www.cooperlighting.com 2013-02-26 12:57:30
241
VXS VISION SITE SMALL LED
POWER AND LUMENS BY BAR COUNT
Number of
DISTRIBUTION
UghtBARs Power Curtent 1 Curtent @
Watts] ;I IN 2'161,0
T2 T3 T4 SL2 S1 i 3 L4 5M0 5W0 SXO RW SLR/SL-
7 LED UGHTBAR
C01 27 0.23 0.13 1 1,819 1 1,798 1,811 1,805 1,746 1,734 1,923 1,930 1,868 1,834 1,660
CO2 54 0.46 0.21 3,509 3,469 3,495 3,484 3,368 3,347 3,711 3,724 3,605 3,540 3,203
CO3 77 1 0.65 0.29 5,291 5,230 5,269 5,252 5,078 5,046 5,594 5,614 5,436 5,337 4,829 LUMEN MULTIPLIER
C04 101 0.86 0.37 6,983 6,902 6,954 6,932 6,703 6,660 7,383 7,410 7,174 7,043 6,373
21 LED UGHTBAR Ambient Lumen
B01 27 0.23 0.13 2,237 2,211 2,228 2,220 2,147 2,133 2,365 1 2,374 1--2,29-8-T--2.256 T 2,041 Temperature Multiplier
B02 51 0.43 0.20 4,317 4,267 4,299 4,285 4,143 4,117 4,564 4,580 [
6,686
4,435 4,354 3,940
10°C 1.04
15°C 1.03B03730.62 0.28 6,508 6,433 6,481 6,460 6,246 6,207 6,881 6,906 6,564 5,939 25°C 1.00
B04 95 0.81 0.35 8,589 8,490 8,554 8,526 8,244 8,192 9,081 9,114 8,824 8,663 7,839 40°C 0.96
MOUNTING VARIATIONS
Wall Mount Arm Mount Single Arm Mount 2 @180° Arm Mount 2 @90°Arm Mount 3 @120°Arm Mount 3 @90° Arm Mount 4 @90°
E.PA E.P.A EAA EAA EAA E.PA
VXS 1.18 VXS 2.20 VXS 1.72 VXS 2.25 VXS 2.35 VXS 2.35
IIII IIII IIII
POLE DRILLING PATTERNS OPTIC ORIENTATION
VXS VXS Structural Mount Street Side Street Sid
TYPE"E") TYPE"F`)
213/16" 5/16"[8mm]dia.hole
72mm) 3/4"[20mm]
dia.hole 2 3/4"
70mml
123mmJ
3 7/8"
W.
99mm] 280mm]
2)3/8"[10mm] 3/4"[20mm) House Side House Sid
dia.holes dia.holes Standard Optics Rotated Left @ 90°[1-90]
3 7/8"[99mm] Street Side
3"
77mml
12)3/8"110mml
dia.holes non
House Side "-
Optics Rotated Right @ 90°[R90J
MOUNTING OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES
Structural Pole Mount
Extruded Arm Round or Square Pole) Structural Wall Mount
Top Cap
F0
0
12"
305 mmi
L
O
Set
Screws
Direct Mount
Round or Square Pole) Direct Wall Mount Wall Bracket with Arm Tenon Adapter
VOOMR Lighting NOTE:Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. AVU092101
Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com
2013-02-26 12:57:30www.cooperlighting.com. Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City,GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801
2013-02-26 16:02:45
242
VXS VISION SITE SMALL LED
ORDERING INFORMATION
Product Family '' Lamp Type Distribution Structural Options s.9 Accessories f5
VXS°Vision Site Small LED=Solid State Light T2=Type II Pole Mourn MA1071-WH=5°Arm for Square Pole
Emitting Diodes
T3=Type III PRCPS=Strut Rod and Clevis Set for 7 MA7074-WN=S"Arm for Round Pole
Number of 3.4
T4=Type IV
Square Pole(Painted to match MA7073-WH=Direct Mount far Square Pole
Lightbars Voltage fixture,does not include arm)
6
5MQ=Type V Square Medium MA1076-WH=Direct Mount for Round Pole
07=[1121 LED LightBAR El 120-277V PRCCS=Stainless Strut Rod and Clevis Set?
B02=[2]21 LED LightBARs 347=347V 5WQ=Type V Square Wide for Square Pole(Clevis painted to MA1077-WH=Wall Bracketwith S'Arm
603'[3]21 LED LightBARs 480=480V
5XQ=Type V Square Extra match fixture,does not include MA7200-WH=Direct Wall Mount Kit
Wide arm MA7101-WH=
B04=[4]21 LED LightBARs 213BQ Adapter for
O.D.Tenon
RW=Rectangular Wide PRCPR=Strut Rod and Clevis Set for a
C01=[7]7 LED LightBARs
SL2'Type If w/Spill Control
Round Pole(Painted to match MA7102-WH=2 @180 Degree'renon
fixture,does not include arm)
Adapter for 2 3/8"O.D.Tenon
CO2=[2]7 LED LightBARs
SL3=Type III w/Spill Control MA7103-WH=3 @120 Degree Tenon
CO3=[3]7 LED LightBARs PRCCR=Stainless Strut Rod and Clevis Seta
Adapterfor 2 3/8"Q.D.Tenon
514'Type IV w/Spill Control for Round Pole(Clevis painted to
COW[4]7 LED LightBARs match fixture,does not included MA11(4-WH=4 @90 Degree Tenon Adapter
SLL=90 Degree Spill Li ht
arm)
for 2 318"O.D.Tenon
Eliminator a MA710SWH=2 @90 Degree Tenon Adapter
11SLR:
90rr Degree Spill Li ht
Wall Mount for 2 3/8"O.D.Tenon
Eliminator Right WRCP=Strut Rod and Clevis Set(Painted9 MA7106-Yi 3 @90 Degree Tenon Adapter
to match fixture,does not include for 2 3/8"O.D.Tenon
arm) MA1107-WH=2 @120 Degree TenonFinish5
WRCS°Stainless Steel Strut Rod and 9 Adapter for 23/8"O.D.Tenon
BK=Black Clevis Set(Clevis painted to match MA7108-WH:Single-arm Tenon Adapterfor
Ap=Grey fixture,does not include arm) 31/2"O.D.Tenon
BZ=Bronze MA7100-WH=2 @180 Degree Tenon
Options 6
Adapterfor 31/2"O.D.Tenon
WH=While P
MAI 11013 @120 Degree Tenon
DP=Dark Platinum PC=Button Type Photocell(specify voltage) Adapter for 3 1/2"O.D.Tenon
GM=Graphite Metallic 2L=Two Circuitsln MA1111-WH=4 @90 Degree Tenon Adapter
for 3 1/2"O.D.Tenon
LCF=LightBAR Cover Plate Matches
MA1112-WH=2 @90 Degree Tenon AdapterHousingFinishfor31/2"O.D.Tenon
7080=70 CRI/6000K CCT+1
MA7113-WH=3 @90 Degree Tenon Adapter
8030=80 CRI/3000K CC'I for 31/2"O.D.Tenon
L90=Optics Rotated Left 90 Degrees
MA 7114-WH=2 @120 Degree Tenon
Adapter for 3 1/2"O.D.Tenon
R90=Optics Rotated Right 90 Degrees MA1253=1okV Circuit Module Replacement
ICB=Integral Cold Weather Battery Pack 12
Specify 120 or 277)
MS-LXX=Motion Sensor for on/off 13
operation
MS/X-LXX=Motion Sensor for bi-level+-
switching
Notes:1 Design Lights'"Consortium Qualified.Refer to www.designlights.org Qualified Products List under
Family Models for details.
2 Arm not included.Order separately.See accessories.
3 Standard 4000 K CCT and greater than 70 CRI.
4 21 LED LightBAR powered at 350mA,7 LED LightBAR powered at 1A.
5 Custom and RAL color matching available upon request.Consult your customer service representative
for further information.
5 Add as suffix in the order shown.
7 Compatible with 5"MA1071 arm only.
8 Compatible with 5"MA1074 arm only.
9 Wall mount structual options do not include arm assembly(See Accessories).Compatible with 5"
MA1071 arm only.
10 Low-level output varies by bar count.Consult factory.Requires quantity two or more LightBARS.
11 Consult customer service for lead times and lumen multiplier.
12 Available with B01,B02,Cot or CO2 configurations only.Specify 120 or 277V.LED cold weather integral
battery pack is rated for minimum operating temperature-0°F(-20°C).Operates(1)lightbar for 90
mmutes.Not available in all configurations,consult factory.Rated for use in 25°C ambient.
13 Sensor mounted to the luminaire.Available in 1301-B06 and C01-CDs configurations.Replace XX with
mounting height in feet for proper lens selection,(i.e.,MS-L25).Consult factory for additional
information.
14 Sensor mounted to luminaire.Available in B02-B06 and CO2-C06 configurations.Replace X with
umber of bars operating in low output mode and replace XX with mounting height in feet for proper
lens selection,(i.e.,MS/3-1_25).Maximum 4 bars in low output mode.Consult factory for additional
information.
15 Order separately,replace XX with color suffix.
COOPER Lighting NOTE:Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice.9 9 AvuoszlolVisitourwebsiteatwww.cooperlighting.com
2013-02-2612:57:30www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City,GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801
2013-02-26 16:02:45
243
w i n o n a L E D Project: Qty,
MOUNTING DETAIL
x7aj
11.50" — — 11.50"
I
5.50 5.50
I
X=No Option WL=Wet Location Option
dry location hidden fasteners) (wet location exposed fasteners)
7w
wet Shown 2.125"box min
STEP13 9 Inch
QUICK FIND#:QF-2057 i V
LED module withSTEP139Inchisasurfacemountsteplightwithaconcealedoptic.
ntegral :: concealed optic
Five LED white temperatures and six LED colors are available. Ribbed design with matte driver —
Distribution:One light distribution pattern available. j black finish reduces glare Steel City H48DLong:For large area illumination. CROSS SECTIONorequivalentConstruction:Die-cast LED module with solid aluminum,brass,or stainless recommended
steel faceplates. by others)
Mounting:Luminaire is mounted to a standard multi-gang switch box
supplied by others)with four fasteners. Steel City H4BD or equivalent
by others)recommended. Typical Distribution Based on 30KIntegralDriver:Integral drivers available for 120V-277VAC in both dimming Grid in 1'increments
and non-dimming versions.
Finish:Recessed surfaces have a ribbed design with a matte black finish to
reduce glare. Faceplates in natural metal finishes have protective clear topcoat.
Faceplates in painted are finished with a two-part wet paint system. Primer only
option allows for field painting. 05
Dimming:True 0-100%dimming is compatible with OV-10V fluorescent-type 10
0dimmer. z2°
Power Consumption:Non-dimming unit consumes 8.04W. Dimming unit 80
consumes 18W.
9 inch- Long Distribution
ETL Listed:Dry Location,Wet Location optional
Note:Winona Lighting reserves the right to make design changes without Lumen Output at 30K
prior notice.
9 Inch Long 310 8.04 38.6
PRODUCT SPECIFICATION
LED STEP13 9 t
a,.... N,... M o.WC ........,
a c ti
a 7rra`"
j...., ;
x
SOURCE MOUNT til FACEPLATE DISTRIBUTION ! LED CODE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS SPECIAL
LED STEP13 9.9 inch L•lon 9 27K•ANSI-binned 2700k Non-Dimming Natural Metal Finishes X• STD
30K-ANSI-binned 3000k ND120V-277V BAL•brushed aluminum
no options standard
BB-brushed brass WL- MOD-
35K•ANSI-binned 3500k Dimming wet location modifed
BSS•br ushed [ini
i s a less steel
i 40K•ANSI-binned 4000k ! DM120V•277V• ' IIPB-polished brass i
50K-ANSI-binned 5000
0., P SS polished stainless steel1OVdhrmerPI'
003•amber required(by others) CMF•custom metal finish i
consult factory) j
004•blue
Painted Finishes
005•cyan
Modification: AB5•antique brass paint
006•green j BBP•brushed brass paint
007-red-orange LBPS•light bronze paint smooth
008•red LSP•light silver paint
PGP-pale gold paint
I SGB•semkgloss black paint
IES report available on the rrebsde
SGW-semi-gloss white paint
I PRM-primer only II
CPF•custom paint finish
j (consult factory)i
Visit www.Wnonalighting.com for the most complete and current information.All fixtures ETL Ifsted,
Winona 3760 west fourth street-winona,minnesota 55987. 507-454-5113 -fax: 507-452.8528
USA and Canada
I I t 1 t I i I www.winonalighting.com
Revised:09 11-12 Pa e 1 Of 2An"Ac ,'s Company g
244
w i n o n a E D Project: Qty:
4'.
a ' POWER SUPPLY/DIMMING
All STEPS models are available with Dimming and Non-Dimming internal drivers in both 120V and 277V input versions.
Dimming drivers require a 0-10V fluorescent-type dimming control.
Read all instructions before installation.Do not make live connections!
NON-DIMMING INSTALLATIONS
Connect STEP WHITE wire to power NEUTRAL.
Connect STEP BLACK wire to power HOT.
Connect STEP GREEN wire to power GROUND.
120V -WHITE To other
or —BLACK STEP
277V —;;c.;F- P
fixtures
W Y W Y
DIMMING INSTALLATIONS
The integral dimming driver is designed to the 0-10V IEC dimming specification 60929 and is compatible with common
0-10V dimmers and dimming systems.Do NOT connect line voltage to dimming input wires.
Connect STEP WHITE wire to power NEUTRAL.
Connect STEP BLACK wire to power HOT.
Connect STEP VIOLET wire to POSITIVE INPUT of Dimming Control.
Connect STEP GREY wire to NEGATIVE INPUT of Dimming Control.
120V -WHITE To other
or —BLACK STEP
277V ---fixtures
W Y W Y
0-10V(+) -VIOLET To other
Dimmer(-) —— Jai STEP
fixtures
o ? c,
Winona 3760 west fourth street•winona,minnesota 55987. 507-454-5113 -fax: 507-452-8528
I I I Y t I e I www.winonalighting.com
Revised:04-04-12 Page 2 of 2
An1VxLdfV&ands Company
245
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL-TYPE IACoverPlug-in Housing VentCoverConnectors Branch Circuit ,
45147TopSlotJunctionBox1- ___ Narrow Beam,2000 Im A22A5145MediumBeam,2000 Im
A5143 Wide Beam 2000 Im
Conoid Directional Downlight
Xicato Remote Phosphorf
ry
I
I—
Flex Function,MultiSourceiM Technology
J" Optics and Applications
Directional systems are designed with locking capability tosuer -rotate 360'and angulate 25°providing true architecturalaimingandcontrolcapability. Optics designed to controltherigorsOfslopedceilinginstallationswhilemaintainingaglarefreeenvironment.Electronic LED Primary AlzakDriverModuleReflectorCone
Heat Thermal Design Features-MultiSourceTMSinkProtectorFlexFunctiondesignallowsfuture
fuCapable
onto be changedinthefieldfrombelow. Downlights/Directionals canbecomewallwashersandviceversa. Fixture housingsaredesignedwithMultiSourceTM
plug and play connectorsallowingfieldconversiontoPARLEDandMHMR-16GX10bases. Proprietary passive heat sinks ensure propertemperaturesaremaintained. Service from below only.Maximum ceiling thickness is 1%".
Modules
Xicato remote phosphor packages are standard with2000Immoduleoperatingon1I ' ti 9 Adr'is standard.2700K, 3500K 400
driver.
available. Rte
CRI
is 50,000 hours at 70%lumen output
ailable. Rated Life
Dimming Driver
Dimming is standard 0-1 OW10%. See accessories foradditionaldimmingoptions. Specify voltage.
Finish
Specular Alzak cones are standard. SoftSheenTM is aDimensionsandSourcesnewfinishdesignedtomitigatethecoloroverangleyellowstreak"associated with remote phosphor sources.SOftglOw 1 and colors available,see accessories. Steel00000Partsarephosphateconditionedthenpaintedmatteblack.Warranty
5 year limited. See KV website for manufacturers details.
0 General
o
D Fixture is re-wired and thermal)A P
y protected, UL and C-ULCIlisted,for damp location and eight wire, 75°C,branch circuit1wiring. All products are union made IBEW. Designed andmanufacturedintheUSA. Marked spacing requires fixtureF-13
c centers to be 24"from adjacent luminaire and 12"fromnearestwall. Allow 3"clearance above unit in the plenum.Number A
Depth
B O D LED Accessories
A5147
Aperture Width' Length Module B Black cone. T Titanium cone.A5143
11 4'/a" 15'/e" 163/
a° 2000 Im
G Gold cone.A5143 279mm 111mm 403mm 416mm H W Wheat Cone.xicato Mocha cone.Y Pewter cone.For Lutron dimming use 161/.'. P Graphite cone.
WT White trim flan e,
Z Bronze cone.Energy and Ordering Information SO Fine micro prism. WHT White complete cone.Module P FMR4 Flush mount,contact factory.Fixture Lumens Am s Lumenss
System
atts ley
Order Code
LL Linear lens. DP Fixed downlight position.A5147 2000 1A 18611
Model L K V A FR Frosted Lens. FLC4 Full lens cone,specify lens.A5145 2000 1A 1515
47 39.6 A5147 20 30 27 1A STC Straight top cone. 27 2700 Kelvin temp.A5143 2000 1A
46 32.5 A5145 20 30 27 1A R2 26"support rails. 3517434737.1 A5143 20 30 27 1A R5 52"support rails. 40 3500 Kelvin temp.Fixture provided standard as 3000K operating on 277V,specular cone.Module lumens: 4000 Kelvin temp.20 for 2000 Im.For other Kelvin color temperatures:change 30 to 27 for 2700K,D 1
Fuse. °35 for 3500K,
or L
40 for 4000K.For 120 volt change 27 to 12.Add D1 for Lutron to 1%,
LutronaddDEforLutronEcoto1%.
DE
t0 1% 3 wire control*Finish,add SS for SoftSheen'M,
add S for Soft
a 27
Lutron EcoS stem to 1°e.g.:A5147-2030271ADISSforg514720001,3000K277V1gWthSoftSheon Mcone,
SpeCIfyVOlta e,
y O digital4wire'Lutron
aces L -79
t%.
REM Remote Bodine EM. Includes batteryjlndicatesLM-7g Test Data. Indicates Preliminary KV Test Data.
kurim light, test switch and single lamp operationat for90er
minutes. Ceiling access required.
1
ver5en M SS SoftSheenTM add SS, e.g. SSW,SoftSheenTMKurtVersenCompanyPointSourceLighting
S Softglow®add S to color,e.
Wheat.
Westwood,New Jersey 07675 1012
9•SC Softglow®clear.
246
A22 A5147 A5145 A5143
Performance Datachart
Single Unit Initial Footcandles,30"Work Plane Ceiling to Floor
Multiple Units Initial Footcandles,30"Work PlaneA5145Xicato2000Im3000K1Amp
Nadir 10° 20° 30°
Ceiling 80% Walls 50% Floor 20%
Spacing is Maximum Over Work PlaneFCFCDiamFCDiamFCDiam
94 73 2' 38 5' 2 81,
91
Spacing RCR Y RCR 3 RCR 8
71 55 3' 28 5' 2 9'
4'104 94
10' 5' 78
76
55 43 3' 22 6' Y 10'
71 57
11'
44 34 3' 18 7' 1 11' 12'
5' 61 55 45
30 23 4' 12 8' 1 13' 14'
6' 49 44 36
See note 2. 7' 33 30 24
Candlepower Distribution Candelas
400
r650
W
800
15*
71
1200 96
1
1600 1
5
9
2000
2400
2800
3200
3600 75 0
4000 —
80 0
5° 15 5° 90 p
A5145 Xicato 2000 Im 3000K 1 Amp Driver ° Vertical AnglesEff.32.5 S/M.64
Luminaire Lumens
Notes
1 Photometric Report:A5145 LTL Report No.29190.
2 Datachart degree headings show one side of nadir.Diameter dataincludesbothsides.Therefore the 10°column shows a 20°patterndiameterattheworkplane.Footcandle values are at the diameter edge.3 Specular colored cone multipliers,contact factory.
4 SoftSheenTM'cone multiplier:Clear x.93.Softglow'cone multiplier:Clear x.87.For colored cone multipliers,contact factory.5 The luminous efficacy(Im/W)refers to the total measured luminousflux(lumens)of the fixture divided by the total measured electrical inputpower(watts)of the complete fixture.
is Kurt Versen Company,Westwood, New Jersey
1012
247
windirect Project: Qty.
MOUNTING
SCV1 SMALL ASYMMETRIC COVE .
Adjustment Range=20' kacWtA
set
PeakGa
2-1/8"
54mm) ---- ------ - --(
i7
1
6-1/2"(165mm)--
SCV1 Asymmetric LED Cove
Weight:
QUICK FIND#:QF-1130 60"=12 Ibs
24"=5 Ibs 72"=14 Ibs
36"=7 Ibis 84"=16 Ibs
48"=9 Ibs 96"=18 Ibs
MOUNTING- Integral front wireway runs the length of PERFORMANCE-High performance small profile linear PROFILE-PI(basic):Anodized,extruded high-puritytheluminaireallowingforacontinuousrowmountluminaireincorporatinganextrudedreflectorspecificallyaluminumspecularreflectorwithsolidaluminumendwithoutspacesbetweensections. Knock outs are designed for high output LED sources. The optical caps and wireway. Stainless steel hardware.located at each end of the housing to allow for through design allows for maximum beam projection across the
wiring. Individual aiming is achieved with the target plane and even cove or slot illumination in tight OPERATING TEMPERATURE-Minimum and
adjustable locking mechanism. See Mounting Detail setback applications. Has aimable and lockable optics, Maximum ambient air temperatures around this
above. is ruggedly constructed and utilizes an extruded luminaire shall not exceed-22°F to 113°F(-30°C to
TYPE-Small profile linear luminaire. For indoor use
aluminum front wireway that allows low profile 45°C). Any application of this product should also
only.
luminaires to be installed continuously,eliminating take into consideration air flow and ventilation to
socket shadows. ensure performance and reliability.
COLOR AND LIGHT OUTPUT-SC VI Cove Series
ELECTRICAL-Power consumption is 15W/R. FINISHES-Bright anodized specular reflector with millutilizes
tunes. Model
white LEDs t five standard color (
maximum run length 28 feet). Operates on 24VAC arid finish aluminum components and stainless steeltemperatures. Model
life is
features(1
t
chard
5
can be dimmed with commonly available low voltage hardware.Estimated LED lamp life is an industry standard 50,000
hours to 70'1 depreciation.A modular design has been magnetic dimming equipment. A wide range of remote
transformers are available in 120V and 277V primary Winona Lighting reserves the right to make designincorporatedthatallowsfieldreplacementoftheLEDrevisionswithoutpriornotice.board/heat sink assembly for this product.
see technical section). P
Color Model SIC V1
ANSI-2700K White 341 Imift
ANSI-3000K White 3501m/It
ANSI-3500K White 3711rMt
ANSI-4000K White 4271m/fl
non-ANSI-5000K White 486
fordry to
SCVt T is a
listed
for dry location.This complies IfiN$
with UL Standard 2108. C"PUA•T
PRODUCT SPECIFICATION 319M
SCV1 SLC LED1 X 27K DM24V P1 RA X STD
MOUNTING TYPE "ODE RUN LENGTH CODE LED CODE VOLTAGE PROFILE FINISH OPTIONS CLASS
SCV1- Total Run 27K- ND24V- RA- X• STD-fmntwireway Length in Feet- 2700K ANSI-binned non-dimming raw anodized no options standard
dry label LED1 (12)Nichia 183 SCV1 offered in 12" 24 volt AC
nc ements starting at 24' 30K- I'll basic anodized reflector MOD-
SLC• high output/ft. g 3000K ANSI-binned DM24V- with mill finish
small LED cove
ex.60FT=60 foot run
dimming components
modified
or 35K- 24 volt AC
Preconfigured 3500K ANSI-binned Nichia 183 LED
Run Length Code- 36'Luminaire
Modification: 40K- 3000K
see submittal at
4000KANSI-binned Report#15314
www.winonalighting.com
additional information 50K-
see technical section) 5000K non-ANSI-
or binned
To Be Determined-
TBD when run length Visit th web for
unknown detailed photometry
reports
Visit www.winonalighting.com for the most complete and current information.
wifio®a
I I I I I I I 1 3760 west fourth street•winona,minnesota 55987•507-454-5113•fax: 507-494-0320•www.winofialighting.com Revised:11-17-11 Page 1 of 6An%4a Ay&w,ds C_p_y
248
windirect`M
Project
Q
r, +,
The Windirect Asymmetric Cove SCV1 Series Is available in lengths up to 96"to 12"increments starting at 24".
kF " An integral wireway runs the length of the luminaire allowing for a continuous row mount without spaces between sections. Knock outs arek9locatedateachendofthehousingtoallowforthroughwiring. Individual aiming is achieved using adjustable locking mechanisms.
Nominal Installed
Length Length
24" 24 3/8" 619.25mm
c ory
set 36" 36 3/16" 919.23mmAdjustmentRange=20` i11Q=,fa 48" 48" 1219.20mm
a de\,a a 60" 59 7/8" 1520.95mm
peaK 72" 71 11/16" 1820.93mm Luminaires can be21/8" 84" 83 112" 2120.90mm mounted without54.10mm 0 96" 95 5/16" 2420.87mm space between
6 1/2" ``
JJ
165.10mm
length(watts)
24"- (30W)
36"- (44W)
48"- (59W)
o
60"- (74W)
72"- (88W)
84"- (103W)
96"- (118W)
Adjustment Range=200
CtfttMiSfC7Na
SIGHT I
j LINE i DIM H DIM(W)
f- +- ----
9- _I Recommended Cove Opening=12"minimum012-1/8"
1 9116" 7-1/25,
I
a 6
eaCrd "
I i 0°Sightline
21/8" 5 _- Ii
54mm) r
tr H
F - 6-1/2"(65mm).
1"
25mm)
wireway -- "
dust cover lens
knock out
Winona
I I t t I t a t
3760 west fourth street•Winona,minnesota 55987• 507-454-5113•fax: 507-494-0320•www.winonalighting.comy/(1.&;ids C'a^ipany
Revised:10-27-11 Page 2 of 6
An
249
windirett'"° Project:Qty
The WINDIRECT SCV1 Series is to be powered by 24VAC only. Do not connect directly to line voltage under anycircumstance. Connection to.line voltage will permanently damage internal components and void manufacturer's warranty.
POWER REQUIREMENTS
WINDIRECT SCV1 consumes 15W/ft. Maximum single run length(from a single 24VAC tap)of WINDIRECTSCV1is28'(420W). The WINDIRECT SCV1 series must be powered by a magnetic transformer. Do not useelectronictransformers.Choose a transformer with adequate capacity.Total load should not exceed 80%oftheratedoutputofthetransformerat24VAC.
24VAC
Transformer
Luminaires can be mounted without space between
Dimming
DIMMING
if required) !
The WINDIRECT SCV1 Series is easily dimmed with Magnetic Low Voltage(MLV)Dimmers. Not all MLVbyothers
dimmers are alike,even among the same manufacturer.Confirm with dimming equipment manufacturerthatdimmerselectedisdesignedtoworkwiththetransformerselected.
120V or 277V
MOUNTING AND WIRING
10 1
B i 5 i 4
Loosen Phillips head screws and Lay in power feed wires and make electrical Luminaire is wired and ready forremovewirewaycover. Mount in connections with supplied connectors, final aiming(if necessary).desired location. Screw wireway cover back in place.
REMOTE MOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS
The WINDIRECT SCV1 Series is powered from remote-mounted transformers. The maximum remote distance of the transformerisdependentonmanyfactorsincludingtotalLEDload,wire size,distance from the transformer to the first fixture in each run,andstartingvoltageatthetransformer.
The installer is to ensure that 24VAC is present at the beginning of the run. By using a combination of large-gauge wire andadjustingtheoutputvoltageofthetransformer,the installer can compensate for voltage drop over long remote distances. Thewiringfromthestartoftheruntothelastfixtureontherunneedonlybe12AWG.
Winona
I I i t I I I q 3760 west fourth street•winona,minnesota 55987•507-454-5113•fax: 507-494-0320 wwwwinonalighting.com Revised:10-27-11AnSM4wlf.&ands Crnpay Page 3 of 6
250
windirerr, Project: Qty:
BALLTest Report: 15314-LM79-08 Catalog Number_ P1-SLC-LE01-36A-30K-ND24V-SCV1-RA-X-STD Candlepower Distribution 3000KDescription:36 Nichia 3000K 183 LEDs/36"Windirect SCV1 Luminaire I Extruded Semi-Specular Reflector
ClearAcrylic Lens
36"Luminaire-3000K1 LM79 Data Windirect SCV1 36 Long Luminaire L o o 0 0 ' 0
0 0 0 p p
ANSI binned 2700K 975 1024 43.1 23.8 85.7 }_97 '
o- 0 1 _0 0 0_
ANSI-binned 3000K 1.00 ' 1050 1 43.1 24.4 ! 7_
9 2 0 0 }- 0
i i 8 4 96 522 359_J}9* 0 '- 0-
d 3500K 1 06 1113 43.1 i 25.8 84.5 96 455 78 -- 1 0_
ANSI-binned 800
4000K 1 22 1280 43.1 29.7_ 86 7 i 96 468 32I 1 0
d 1
1 786 442 46 1 4 - 1_....non-ANSI-binned 5000K 1 39 1459 I
43.1 1 339 i 70.1 _.96 __IPeakCandela843cd 700 403} 61 s 3
603 367 76 16 5-
ZOnalLumen o 507 337 -89 20 9zLumens /oFixture 1Summaryq,, a37 31a 106 t 41 n-
NiGhia 183 3000K 508 48A ;384 299 109 53 i 29
P 685 65 2 347 281 117 I 64 fi 41_
1
s
923 87.9 322 262 123 72 _55
1050 100.0 257 223 130-1 86 77
Total 188 175 134
Y
103 94
Luminaire 1050 1000 L_4- -r
127 127 127 1 727 127
Catalog Number: P1-SLC-LED1-72A-30K-ND24V-SCVI-RA-X-STD Candlepower Distribution 3000KDescription:72 Nichia 3000K 183 LEDs/72"Windirect SCV1 Luminaire t Extruded Semi-Specular Reflector/
ClearAcrylic Lens
72"Luminaire-3000K LM79 Data Windirect SCV1 72 Long Luminaire 0 0 0 _
I z"
f
t lx£I
P
D 0 _0 0 _ 0 -
I D DNote:
oil n4 0 0 0AllresultsbasedOnANSI-binned 2700K --- __975 2048 86.2 23 8 85 7 .97
BALL Test Report ANSI binned 3000K 1 00 2100 86.2 {I 24 4 87 4 ;96
1044 71818 0 _015314. ANSI binned 3500K 1 06 2226 86.2 1 25.8 [84,5 1 .96 1600 910 33 0 -- 0._A 2.0 multiplier was
Used t0 provide 72'
ANSI-binned 4000K 1,22 2560 86 2 29.7 86 7 j .96 1686 936 64 2 0
non-ANSI-binned SOOOK 1 39 2918 86.2 X33 9 70 1 6 1572 884 . 92 8 2data. a_--- i _- -._ .._-.-
1400 806 Tu-F 18 1_--..6--
Peak Candela 1686cd zos 73a ,5z 32 10
Zonal Lumen s o 1014 674 178 40 18
Summa Lumens /oFixture i
Y 87 L 200 92 3a
Nichial$330vOK ', 1016 484 768 598 218 106 58
1370 65 2 694 562 234 128 82
K 1846 87 9 644 524 -246 744 110
2100 100.0 5'
376
446 260
206 188
172 154
wfndired Total 350 268
i Luminaire 2100 100.0 ':. 264 254 254 264254
g fiti ng
faciscm
43.'1
94
cam t t aalt tom', 87
all
yl
All results are woording to iESNA 6M-792008;Approved Method for fto Electrical and
FROr~Hc Testing ofSolid-Stale ugnnng Ti Department of Energy MOEt verities
product test data and resrdts.
Visit www.fightingfacts.com for the Label Relererree Guide.
Registration Number:8404.GHHF6M
Modal Number:P1SC-LED-56HO.30K-24VNDSCVI-RA-STD
Type'Cove light
Winona
I I i I I 1 t t 3760 west fourth street•winona,minnesota 55987• 507-454-5113 •fax: 507-494-0320-www.winOnalighting.comAn &ands coapury Revised:10-27-11 Page 4 of 6
251
windireet- Project: Qty:
DETERMINING THE CORRECT PRECONFIGURED RUN LENGTH CODE
STEP 1: Determine which model is right for your project. See column 1 of the chart below In this example, model SCV1
has been selected. Find complete information(catalog, submittals, applications guide)at www.winonalighting.com.
STEP 2: Determine how many feet are required. The second column of the chart below provides codes for Nominal Run
Lengths between 1 and 28 feet.
STEP 3: If the amount of product required exceeds the length in the last row of a chart,you should break the run into
several lengths to arrive at the desired amount.
For example a 48'run of SCV1 can be specified as: Quantity Run Length Code Total Feet
2 L24 48
3 L16 48
Note. Run length codes are nominal lengths.
The exact dimensions are displayed in
column 4(actual run length).
Preconfigured
Nominal
System Run Actua Run
Total
TransformerL3
Run Length
Run
Configuration Len,th
Run
Length 9 RequiredWafts13indicates3foot
SCVt L2 2' 1 2'-318"30 50 Watt
L indicates which chart L3 3' 1 T-3/16" 45 75 Watt
you are using(model SCV1)SCV1 L4 4' 1 4'-0" 60 75 Watt
SCV1 L5 5' 1 4'-117/8" 75 100 WattByplacingL3intherunlength77-1 L6 6' 1 6-1111/16" 90 150 WattcodefieldofyourspecificationSCV1L77' 1 6-111/2, 105 150 Wattyouhaveindicatedyouneed
SCVt L8 8'1 T-11 5116" 120 15o WaftSCV1inarunof3feet.
SCV1 L9 9' 1 1 18'-11718" 135 300 Watt
SCVt L10 10' 2
Total Run Length in Feet L3
9'•11 3/4" 150 300 Watt
SCV1 L11 11' 1 1 10'-11 9/16" 165 300 WattSCV1offeredm12'increments starting at 24'
SCV1 L12 12' 2 111--113/8' 180 300 Watt
a SCV1 L13 13' 1 1 17-113/16" 195 300 Watt
Preconfigured Run Length Code SCV1 1-14 14' 2 13'-11" 210 300 Waft
see 7SCV1 L15 15 1 1 14'-1013116" 225 300 Watth!+
SCV1 L16 16'2 16-105/8' 240 300 Watt
To Be Determined SCV1 L17 17' 1 2 16-10 1f4" 255 500 Watt
TED<<a,en run,reir_th ue+ka 6sY>+SCV1 L18 18' 1 1 3 1 11T-11 1/16" 270 500 Watt
SCV1 L19 19'2 118'-10 13/16" 285 500 Watt
System Run Configuration GGIA 629 20, 1 2 1 19'-105/8" 300 500 Watt
Describes size of luminaires and SCV1 L21 21' 20'-101/2" 315 500 Watt
quantities of each which will be used SCV1 L22 22' 1 2 21'-10 5/16" 330 500 Watttoconfiguretherun. In this example, SCV1 L23 23' 1 2 22'-101/8" 345 500 WattL20ismadeupof(1)48"and(2)96" SCV1 L24 24'3 23'-915/16" 360 500 Wattluminaires. SCV1 L25 25' 1 1 1 2 24'-101/2" 375 500 Watt
SCV1 L26 26' 1 3 125'-105/16" 390 1 500 Watt
Actual Run Length 26-101/8" 1 405 500 Watt
The final run length dimension. SCV1 L28 28' 1 1 3 27'-915/16" 420 500 Watt
Maximum Single Run Length Required Transformers
The last row of each chart Identifies the proper size transformer to power a run
indicates the maximum single and includes 20%headroom.
run length from a single 24VAC
tap for SCV1.
If the information above is not available and the specification process needs to get underway you can supply the total number oflinearfeetfortheentirejob. We will be able to provide an approximate budget quote at that time, however,specific Run Length
Code information will have to be provided later for accurate pricing.
When no fixture run length information is known enter TBD(to be determined)to begin the specification process. No pricing willbedeterminedatthistime.
Winona
1 1 1 k i i 1 1 3760 west fourth street" winona,minnesota 55987 "507-454-5113"fax: 507-494-0320^www.winonalighting.com Revised:10-27-11 Page 5 of 6AnMcuftlr&ankh Compary
252
windireet Project:Qty
a ea
aP i
SCV1 L2 2'1 2'-3/8" 30 50 Watt
SCV1 L3 3' 1 3-3/16" 45 75 Watt
SCV1 L4 4' 1 4'-0" 60 75 Watt
SCV1 L5 5' 1 4'-11 7/8" 75 100 Watt
SCV1 L6 6' 1 S-11 11/16" 90 150 Watt
SCV1 L7 7' 1 6'-11 112" 105 150 Watt
SCV1 L8 8' 1 7'-11 5/16"120 150 Watt
SCV1 L9 9' 1 1 8'-11 7/8" 135 300 Watt
SCV1 L10 10' 2 9'-11 314" 150 300 Watt
SCV1 Ll l 11' 1 1 10'-11 9/16" 165 300 Watt
SCV1 L12 12' 2 11'-11 318"180 300 Watt
SCV1 L13 13' 1 1 12'-11 3/16" 195 300 Watt
SCV1 L14 14' 2 13-11" 210 300 Watt
SCV1 L15 15' 1 1 14'-1013/16" 225 300 Watt
SCV1 L16 16' 1 2 15'-10 5/8"240 300 Watt
SCV1 L17 17' 1 2 16-101/4"255 500 Watt
SCV1 L18 18' 1 3 17'-11 1/16" 270 500 Watt
SCV1 L19 19' 1 2 18'-1013/16" 285 500 Watt
SCV1 L20 20' 1 2 19'-10 5/8"300 500 Watt
SCV1 L21 21' 1 2 20'-101/2"315 500 Watt
SCV1 L22 22' 1 2 21'-10 5/16" 330 500 Watt
SCV1 L23 23' 1 -2 22'-101/8"- _ 345 - _ 500 Watt=
SCV1 L24 24' 3 23'-915/16" 360 500 Watt
SCV1 L25 25' 1 1 2 24'-101/2"375 500 Watt
SCV1 L26 26' 1 3 25'-10 5/16" 390 500 Watt
SCV1 L27 27' 1 3 26-101/8"405 500 Watt
SCV1 L28 28' 1 3 27'-915/16" 420 500 Watt
Winona
I I 1 i I I o 1 3760 west fourth street•winona,minnesota 55987• 507-454-5113•fax: 507-494-0320•www.winonalighting.com Revised:10-27-11 Page 6 of 6An-,4wmyB.,ds Canpdy
253
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL-TYPE ID
MultiSourceT" Vent Housing Plug-in Branch Circuit
A4136 A2CoverSlotTopConnectorsJunctionBoxNarrowBeam,2000 Im
A4134 Medium Beam,2000 Im
A4132 Wide Beam,2000 Im
43/8"Conoid Downlight
01 Xicato Remote Phosphor
Fixed Function,MultiSourceT""Technology
y
Optics and Applications
Downlight optical systems have been engineered to produce
high efficiencies and soft patterns while maintaining excellent
brightness control. Beam patterns range from 25°to 75°.
Electronic Xicato Alzak Heat Thermal Design Features-MultiSourceTM CapableDriverModuleConeSinkProtectorFixturehousingsaredesignedwithMultiSourceTM plug
and play connectors allowing field conversion to PAR LED
and MH MR-16 GX10 bases. New lighting technologies
will be incorporated as they become available assuring
continuity. Proprietary passive heat sinks ensure proper
ft sa ego temperatures are maintained. Service from below only.
Maximum ceiling thickness is 1%".
Modules
Xicato remote phosphor modules use high efficiency
blue LEDs that are converted to white light when directed
through a phosphor lens.2000 Im module operating on
1A driver standard.3000K,80 CRI is standard.2700K,
3500K,4000K available. Rated Life is 50,000 hours at
70%lumen output.
Dimming Driver
Dimming is standard 0-10V/10%. See accessories for
additional dimming options. Specify voltage.
Finish
Specular Alzak cones are standard. SoftSheenTM is a
Dimensions and Sources new finish designed to mitigate the color over angle
yellow streak"associated with remote phosphor sources.
Softglow®and colors available,see accessories. Steel
parts are phosphate conditioned then painted matte black.
Warranty00000
5 year limited. See KV website for manufacturers details.
o
A
D General
Fixture is pre-wired and thermally protected, UL and C-UL
listed,for damp location and eight wire,75°C,branch
1 circuit wiring.All products are union made IBEW.
B— c
Designed and manufactured in the USA.
Accessories
Number
Depthp Aperture Width* Length Module G Gold cone. W Wheat cone.A4136
y.,43/0, 157/a" 163A" 2000 Im H Mocha cone.Y Pewter cone.A4134
229mm 111mm 403mm 416mm XicatoA4132 P Graphite cone. Z Bronze cone.
For Lutron dimming use 167/8". WT White trim flange. WHT White complete cone.
R2 26"support rails. FMR4 Flush mount,contact factory.
Energy and Ordering Information R5 52"support rails. 27 2700 Kelvin temp.
Module System System Order Code F Fuse. 35 3500 Kelvin temp.Fixture Lumens Amps Lumens Watts Im/W Model L K V A 40 4000 Kelvin temp.A4136 2000 1A 1869° 47 39.8 A4136 20 30 27 1A D1 Lutron to 1%,3 wire control*
A4134 2000 1A 1811= 49 37 A4134 20 30 27 1A DE Lutron EcoSystem to 1%,digital 4 wire"
A4132 2000 1A 18781 47 40.8 A4132 20 30 27 1 A *Specify voltage.
Fixture provided standard as 3000K operating on 277V,specular cone.Module lumens: REM Remote Bodine EM. Includes battery pack,charger20for20001m.For other Kelvin color temperatures:change 30 to 27 for 2700K,
35 for 3500K,40 for 4000K. light,test switch and single lamp operation for 90For120voltchange27to12.Add D1 for Lutron to 1%,add DE for Lutron Eco to 1%. minutes. Ceiling access required.Finish:add SS for SoftSheen-,add S for Softglow®See accessories for colors.
SS SoftSheenTM add SS,e.g.SSW,Soft Sheen TM Wheat.e.g.:A4134-2030271 AD1 SS for A4134 20001m 3000K 277V 1A vnth SoftSheen''cone,
Lutron dimming to ar KV Test Data.Indicates Preliminary S Softglow®add S to color,e.g.SC Softglow®clear.
kurF %varawm
Kljo Versofj Coenpe jy Point Source Lighnng
bVes':vsood,New Jersey 07675 1012
254
A2 A4136 A4134 A4132
Performance Datachart
Single Unit Initial Footcandles,30"Work Plane Ceiling to Floor Multiple Units Initial Footcandles,30"Work Plane
A4134 Xicato 2000 Im 3000K 1Amp Ceiling 80% Walls 50% Floor 20
Nadir 10°20°30° Spacing is Maximum Over Work Plane
FC FC Diam FC Diam FC Diam Spacing RCR 1 RCR 3 RCR 8
44 49 3' 28 5' 7 9' 10' 6' 55 49 37
34 38 3' 22 6' 5 10' 11' 7' 43 38 29
27 30 3' 18 7' 4 11' 12' 8' 34 30 23
19 21 4' 12 8' 3 13' 14' 9' 23 21 16
13 15 5' 9 10' 2 16' 16' 11'17 15 11
See note 5.
A4136 use At 137 1300 Im 1Amp,multiply by 1.4.
A4132 use Al 133 1300 Im 1Amp,multiply by 1.4.
Candlepower Distribution Candelas
88° 37W
290
V751 ° 1811*
580 0 2447
85° 5 2854
870 10 2860
1160
55°
1
15 2469
20 1914
25 920
1450 5° 30 611
35 565
1740 40 329
45 24
50 0
203035° 55 0
60 0
2320 65 0
70 0
2610 75 0
80 0
2900 85 0
5 15a, 5° 90 0
A4134 Xicato 2000 Im 3000K 1 Amp Driver ° Vertical Angles
Eff.78.0 S/M.56 Luminaire Lumens
Notes
1 Photometric Report:A4134 LTL Report No.26909.
2 Datachart degree headings show one side of nadir.Diameter data includes
both sides.Therefore the 10°column shows a 20°pattern diameter at the work
plane.Footcandle values are at the diameter edge.
3 Specular colored cone multipliers,contact factory.
4 SoftSheenT'cone multiplier:Clear x.93.Softglow0cone multiplier:
Clear x.87.For colored cone multipliers,contact factory.
5 The luminous efficacy(Im/W)refers to the total measured luminous flux
lumens)of the fixture divided by the total measured electrical input power
watts)of the complete fixture.
Kurt Versen Company,Westwood, New Jersey 1012
255
md
LITECONTROL P
Fixture Type:
roject Name:
Wall/Slot 6000
0
T WS-L60
6 1/2"
165) Recessed Perimeter
Product DescriptiontopenndardSmall-scale LED recessed perimeter luminaire using
iling Cree MX-6 LED packages for wall grazing applications.
ing is G rid Ceiling Available in three output levels and four color
4, temperatures,with an optional Luminance Control2mm) Also adjustable to 5"(127) a, Deflector.Extruded aluminum LED module snaps intoand6"(152)infield
steel housing for in-field replacement.CSA and/or
UL Listed.
Ordering Guide
Product,Lam in ,&Length
O tions
WS - L60 I CWM- D D
Mounting Series Lengthin Output Color Temperature Finish CeilingType Dimming Voltage Optionsfeet(mm)
Ws L60 02(610) LO* 35K is CWM G D10 120 LCD
Wall/Slot 03(914) MO standard matte grid LEC 277
04(1219) HO 27K,30K, white)is DP LHI
06(1829) 40K also available standard drywall/ LTW
08(2438) Lnotow Output plaster NDM
available see
3'lengths Color
see
Temperature
Dimming
WS-L6004-M0-35K-CWM-G-LHI-120 is a typical catalog number for a 4-foot long LED wall/slot fixture,medium output,3500K correlated colortemperature,matte white finish,for grid ceiling wired with a Lutron Hi-Lume dimming power supply,120 volts.
Output Dimming
LO Low Output-output from LED boards approximately 250 lumens/ D10 Low-voltage dimming;fixture will be wired for 0-10V dimming.foot out of the fixture at an input power of approximately 4 Watts/foot. LEC Lutron Ecosystem dimming;fixture will be wired with a Lutron A-series driverThesevaluesmayvarybasedonCCT.Consult test reports for details. for compatibility with Ecosystem controls.Driver provides constant currentMOMediumOutput-output from LED boards approximately 500 lumens/ output and uses constant current reduction dimming.See lutron.com for a listfootoutofthefixtureataninputpowerofapproximately8Watts/foot of compatible dimming devices.These values may vary based on CCT.Consult test reports for details. LHI Lutron Hi-Lume 3-wire dimming;fixture will be wired with a Lutron A-seriesHOHighOutput-output from LED boards approximately 775 lumens/foot driver for compatibility with Hi-Lume controls.Driver provides constantoutofthefixtureataninputpowerofapproximately16Watts/foot. current output and uses constant current reduction dimming.See lutron.comThesevaluesmayvarybasedonCCT.Consult test reports for details. for a list of compatible dimming devices.
LTW Lutron 2-wire forward phase dimming;fixture will be wired with a LutronColorTemperatureA-series driver for compatibility with 2-wire forward phase controls.Driver
provides constant current output and uses constant current reduction3500Kisstandardandavailablewithnormalleadtimes.Other CCTs dimming.See lutron.com for a list of compatible dimming devices.may require longer lead times;please contact factory for details.Within NDM Non-dimming;fixture will be wired for fixed light output.an individual fixture of 3500K LEDs,color tolerance is limited to±64K
compared to ANSI allowance of±245K)and to±0.0015 Duv(compared
to ANSI±0.006).Color variation over life is expected to be<0.001(Au'v'), Ceiling Type Specify the applicable ceiling.
compared to Energy Star specification of 0.007.See color statement at
litecontrol.com for details and for other CCT tolerances.Minimum CRI 80. DP Drywall/Plaster G Grid
Accommodates a
range of drywall
0 0 thicknesses:
0 0 1/2",3/4';5/8"
61/2" and 1".
165)
Options
Standard
LCD Luminance Control Deflector.Shields LEDs from direct view and minimizesceiling
shadows on wall.Paint finish is Matte White(CWM)baked enamel.Shield isopeningisDrywall/Plaster Ceiling
4"with optional Luminance removable without tools and remains attached to the fixture with cable tethers.
102 mm) Control Deflector(LCD)See photometric reports for details.
Also adjustable to 5"(127)and 6"(152)in field
Lumen Maintenance
Lumen maintenance based on LM-80 data and in-situ temperature measurement:L90
calculated at>50,00 hours;L70 calculated at>160,000 hours for Medium Output
Since LM-80 testing ended at 6048 hours,theTM-21 reported L90 and L70 values are
36,288 hours.See litecontrol.com for detailed lumen maintenance statement
These fixtures have a five-year warranty,with a detailed warranty statement available
at litecontrol.com.
Quick
Find L60QuestionstoAsk
1.Row information,including desired fixture lengths?2.Output? 3.Color
litecontrol.comTemperature? 4.Dimming? S.120 or 277 volt? 6.Option? revised 11/8/2012
256
12 Wall/Slot 6000 WS-L60
Specifications
FIXTURE SUPPORT RAIL.Extruded white aluminum,wall-mounted rail provides continuous support and true alignment of fixtures and components.Rail is
designed to provide a reveal at the wall to compensate for irregularities in wall construction.Splines are included for continuous alignment.
HOUSING.Steel housing,finished white.Ends provided with 7/8"diameter hole to accommodate wiring.Supplied with external brackets for ease of row mounting.
LED MODULE. Extruded aluminum,finished matte white for high reflectance,easily removable for field replacement.Module has 12 Cree LEDs per foot.
LENS.The LED module includes a lens comprised of highly efficient diffusion film optically bonded to pure acrylic sheet.
SECONDARY OPTIC.Injection molded optical material that incorporates multiple total internal reflection lenses to shape and smooth the light.
CEILING TYPE.Compatible with most types of ceiling systems,including grid and plaster. Fixture system must be installed prior to installation of ceiling.Finish of wall
should extend 6"above finished ceiling height.
CERTIFICATION. Fixture and electrical components shall be CSA,UL and/or CUL Listed.
WARRANTY.Five-year product warranty.See litecontrol.com for full warranty details.
Note:Litecontrol reserves the right to change specifications without notice for product development and improvement.
Planning for Installation Adjustable Ceiling Opening
Fxiture lengths:
ozNominal
2' 3' 4' 6' 8'Fixture Length
Actual Fixture
24"(609) 36"(914) 48'(1219 72"(1829) 96"(2438)Length 6 1/2'
165)
it
4"(102)—J
5"(127)
6"(152 mm)
System Connectors
Catalog Number
WS -L60-CWM
Mounting Series Ceiling Type Option Connector Finish
WS L60 G EC End Cap CWM j
DP LCD SE Straight Extension Matte
IC Inside Corner White z
OC Outside Corner o
see
Connector
Details
WS-L60-G-OC-CWM is a typical catalog number for an outside corner connector for a grid ceiling fixture.
Plan View Connector Details
Corners,extensions,and end Ceiling Extension or Corner Dimensions
caps,when added to fixtures, Connector Opening (Minimum-Maximum along wall in parenthesis)
permit continuous wall-to-
wall installation.Ceiling trim SE 4" SE Straight Extension(2"-12")
SE IC requires field cutting.Corner IC IC Inside Corner-90°(6"-16"),135°(4"-13'1
angles are adjustable,see OC OC Outside Corner-90°(2"-12'),135°(2"-12")
plan view for angles.
5" SE Straight Extension(2"-12")
70'-140' IC Inside Corner-90°(7"-16'),135°(4"-16")
OC Outside Corner-90°(2"-12"),135°(2"-12")
6" SE Straight Extension(2"-12")
See web site for installation details. IC Inside Corner-90°(W-16"),135°(5"-16")
70'-160° OC Outside Corner-90°(2"-12"),135o(2"-12")
OC
LITECONTROL Quick Find
L60
781 2940100 f:781 293 2849 litecontrol.com
litecontrol.com
257
13 Photometric Data (medium output) Wall/Slot 6000 WS-G-L60,WS-R-L60
3500K 4"opening 3500K LCD 4"openi.no 3500K 6"opening 3500K LCD 6"opening
Across — Across — Across — Across —
45----_-
180-
45----_- 45------ 45180' Along— Along--- ISO' Along---ISO,Along---
1500 1200
1500 1200
150- 150' I 150' 150'
ll2 900
12 900
5 120 0 120 5 120'
I
120
375 300375300
90- 90'
90- 90`
r
60- 1
60 60- 60-
i
30- s
30'
ii
30 30
WS-L6004-MO-35K WS-L6004-MO-35K-LCD WS-L6004-MO-35K WS-L6004-MO-35K-LCD
with 4"Opening with 4"Opening with 6"Opening with 6"Opening53LPWEfficacy40LOWEfficacy54LPWEfficacy42LPWEfficacy
LITECONTROL Quick Find
L60
781 294 0100 f:781 293 2849 litecontrol.com litecontrol.com
258
AMETRIXTM
er,yyDESCRIPTION
The Ametrix Asyx is an LED asymmetric luminaire designed for both
general illumination and highlighting architectural features.The sleek
minimal design makes it an ideal complement to any modern space. PIN
collection
Proprietary AccuLED optics offer precision optical control to maximize light ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL C
collection and directional distribution onto the application area.The Asyx
outperforms similar traditional HID fixtures with a 25%improvement in
efficacy as well as a superior lifespan that will minimize maintenance costs.
SPECIFICATION FEATURES
Construction Electrical LED Optics
Heavy wall,die-formed aluminum LED drivers are potted and heat Asyx luminaires feature patented,
housing and heat sink has precise sunk for optimal performance and high-efficiency AccuLED Optics
tolerance control and repeatability prolonged life.Standard drivers that maximize light collection and
in manufacturing.Housing features feature electronic universal voltage directional distribution onto the
vents for air flow and thermal 120-277V/50-60hz),greater than application region.Each optical
management. Fixture is rated for 0.9 power factor,less than 20% [ens is precision manufactured via
40°C ambient environment. harmonic distortion and feature injection-molding then precisely
ambient temperature range of arranged and sealed on the board
Finish 40°C(104°F)down to minimum media.LEDs:High output LEDs,
Housing is polyester powder coat starting temperature of-30°C 50,000+hours life at>70%lumen
paint for superior protection 22 1F).0-10V dimming option maintenance,offered standard in
against fade and wear.LightBAR? available. 3000°K and 4000°K(+/-275K)CCIT.
cover plates are standard white 3000k LEDs nominal 80 CRI,and
wandmaybespecifiedtomatch4000knominal70CRI. ASYX-WLfinishofluminairehousing.
Standard colors include black, Warranty
bronze,silver,and white.RAL and Standard five-year limited Wall Mount Indirect
custom color matches available. warranty.
LED
F12 7/
a" 14'/e"
5/
8"
1
2 2/
8" T 3 1/2"
ORDERING INFORMATION
WL IN B03 Al UNV W RC
ra
ct UL Rating Lens Number of LightBARs Color Temperature voltage Finish Options
sx IN=Ind oor damp loca- C=Clear acrylic B03=[3121 LED Lightbars, 30=3000k UNV=Universal B=Bronze D10=0-10V Dimming
c age"shape, tion rated Lens. 70 Watts,6000 lumens 40=4000k' C=Custom Color
symmetric Indirect
N=None MOD B02 MOD 2700K K=Black
S=Silver
W=White
Light Distribution TBD
AI-Indirect Asymmetric Light
MountingPattern
Note:1 Consult factory for 80 CRI option in 4000K. RC=Rectangular Canopy
MODIFIED WITH BACKLIGHT GLARE CONTROL LOUVERS CUSTOM
I/
COOPER Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice.ADY121404
www.cooperlighting.com
Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. 08/17/2012 10:53:09 AM
259
PHOTOMETRICS
Ametrix
180* 165' 150* - - Candela Zonal Lumen Summary5400
Angle 0-Deg 45-Deg 90-Deg Zone Lumens %Lamp %Fixture
135°
0 0 0 0 90-110 862 N.A. 14.4
3600 90 0 0 0 90-120 2648 N.A. 44.1
95 145 118 36 90-130 3616 N.A. 60.2i
i
i 100 327 494 58 90-150 4948 N.A. 82.4
120• 105 827 2773 110 90-180 6003 N.A. 100
1800 — 110 3223 5089 497 110-180 5141 N.A. 85.6
y 115 4223 4231 1561 0-180 6003 N.A. 100
120 3644 2346 1696
125 2157 1421 1380
90 130 1789 1327 877
135 1871 1391 843
LEGEND:
140 1968 1464 920
o-deg_ 145 2034 1522 1011
180-deg ------_ 150 2031 1563 1097
Asyx 155 1943 1586 1162
WL-IN-C-BO3-AI-35-W-RC
160 1839 1607 1212
6003 lumens 165 1773 1608 1289
70 Watts
170 1663 1560 1391
85.8 Im/W
175 1553 1528 1468
180 1488 1488 1488
Test Report#ITL72651
Coefficients of Utilization
Effective floor cavity reflectance 20%
rc 80% 70% 50% 30% 10%0%
rw 70 50 30 10 70 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 50 30 10 0
RCR
0 95 95 95 95 81 81 81 81 56 56 56 32 32 32 10 10 10 0
1 87 83 79 76 747 71 68 65 48 47 45 28 27 26 9 9 8 0
2 79 72 66 62 67 62 57 53 42 40 37 24 23 22 8 7 7 0
3 72 63 56 51 61 54 49 44 37 34 31 21 20 18 7 6 6 0
4 65 56 48 43 56 48 42 37 33 29 26 19 17 16 6 6 5 0
5 60 49 42 36 51 42 36 32 29 25 22 17 15 13 5 5 4 0
6 55 44 36 31 47 38 32 27 26 22 19 15 13 11 5 4 4 0
7 50 39 32 27 43 34 28 23 23 19 17 14 11 10 4 4 3 0
8 47 35 28 23 40 30 24 20 21 17 14 12 10 9 4 3 3 0
9 43 32 25 20 37 28 22 18 19 15 13 11 9 8 4 3 3 0
10 40 29 22 18 34 25 19 16 17 14 11 10 8 7 3 3 2 0
COOPER Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADY121404
www.cooperlighting.com
Ametrix•Customer First Center•1121 Highway 74 South•Peachtree City,GA 30269•TEL 770.486.4800•FAX 770.486.4801 08/17/2012 10:53:09 AM
260
TYPE'
EBN2'
q '
BOLLARD FULL
CUTOFF
lti4
i
2700K 36"
MOUNTING
HEIGHT
EBN2
EBN2
BLACK
FINISH
I
BN2
EBM2
y =
g °,-,
r
Md. %
N2
EBN
EBNrr
J-..,_
PNI-
N2
EB
PNL
a'
RA3
EWN1
EWN1
y
TYPE'
EWN1'
EWN1
t
s
y
r
s:
r
STEPLIGHT
PNLI
FULL
CUTOFF
2700K
E „_.
24"
MOUNTING
HEIGHT
EBN2 /.
NR
BLACK
FINISH
EP
C'
I
EBN2,
PHASE
2)
EPN4
EPN4
N
TYPE'
EPN4','
EPNL','
E
PNR','
RAW
AREA
LUMINAIRE
SYMBOL
KEY
iP
N,
FULL
CUTOFF
2700K
DISTRIBUTION
PATTERN
Y'
12'
MOUNTING
HEIGHT
BLACK
FINISH
Calculation
Summary
LUMINAIRE
SYMBOL
Label
Avg
Max
Min
Max/
Min
BUILDING
WALK
0.
00
5.
87
0.
33
17.
79
ENTRY
WALK
1.
64
5.
17
0.
03
172.
33
I--
I
LUMINAIRE
TYPE
PARK
Planar
0.
73
3.
74
0.
01
f6-.
00
EP
PA
WALK
0.
00
8.
0
0.
5
16.
00
EPN4
PARKING
0.
99"
3.
74
0.
16
23.
38
NORTH
XWALK
E
2.
76
2.
98
2.
53
1.
18
XWALK
W
3.
10
3.
66
2.
53
1.
45
10'
40'
0'
20'
80'
SCALE:
1"=
40'-
0"
PARKING
LOOP
ASPEN
VALLEY
HOSPITAL
aw'
No.
o
PARKING
LOOP
SK-
5
Date:
02-
28-
13
261
EWN1
I
I
EWN1
SYMBOL KEYEBN1
DISTRIBUTION PATTERN
EWN1 \ \ \ LUMINAIRE SYMBOL
EBN1
LUMINAIRE TYPE
EPN4
EBN1
TYPE'EBN1','EBN2' TYPE'EWN1' TYPE'EDNR','RA3'
BOLLARD STEPLIGHT AREA LUMINAIRE
FULL CUTOFF FULL CUTOFF FULL CUTOFF
2700K 2700K 2700K
36"MOUNTING HEIGHT 24"MOUNTING HEIGHT 12'MOUNTING HEIGHT
BLACK FINISH BLACK FINISH BLACK FINISH
EWN1
rNR
oEWN1
RA3
aEWN1 PHASE 2
EWN1EWN1 --- —
EWN1
EBN2 j
j
EWN1
EWN1
EWN1
Q1.00P Roan
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL Drawing No.
1"_40,_0„ 10' 40'
LOOP ROAD SK-60' 20' 80'
NORTH SCALE:1"=40'-0"
Date:02-28.13 262
C11
v
ID
ID (Di ID i
I
it ID
p ID
11.3 1129 11.33 1190 11.1 11.31
O
iD 1z
r _-1—o IS IS-1 Is IS- Is IS
IsIs\
ID IS i
A
fC Z IS
D
IG
A)TYPE'IA'
114,1 RECESSED ACCENT LIGHT
2700K LED 11.41
F
v
1S
J TYPE'IG'
1 I LINEAR WALL GRAZE
2700K LED
TYPE'IC'
COVE UPLIGHT
f —- - - -2700K LED
f
i
z
TYPE']A'
X
RECESSED ACCENT LIGHT
2700K
TYPE'ID'
RECESSED DOWN LIGHT
2700K LED
I
i
ATRIUM LIGHTING PLAN
SCALE:1/16"=1'-0" ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL Drawing No.
a
4--- ATRIUM LIGHTING PLAN SK-8
Date:02-28-13 263
0
r: fir 1. 1141w-,7r„
i ' 1 i;,• •i411 i ' ,Oil 1 f i ,7,i,
iii a r • t 1
IL
AM jamat
I ILL AWL
Ell
WHITCOMB
TERRACE
1 i
264
o 1
Ad Name: 8931511 A LEGAL NOTICE
ORDINANCE#6,2013 PUBLIC HEARING
Customer: Aspen (LEGALS) City of Ordinance#6,Series of 2013,was adopted on first
reading at the City Council meeting February 25,Your account number: 1013028 2013. This ordinance,if adopted willapprove afi-
nal planned unit development for phases III and IV
of the Aspen Valley Hospital. The public hearing
on this ordinance is scheduled for March 11,2013,
PROOF OF PUBLICATION Tosee
theia tire text,gouto hecity's legal notice
website
http:/Avww.aspenpftkin.com/Departments/Clork/Le-
gal-Notices/
If you would like a copy FAXed,mailed or e-mailed
to you,call the city clerk's office,429-2686.T31 A2:1 TIM:1 Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on February
28,2013. [8931511]
STATE OF COLORADO,
COUNTY OF PITKIN
I,Jim Morgan, do solemnly swear that I am General
Manager of the ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY, that
the same weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in
part and published in the County of Pitkin, State of
Colorado,and has a general circulation therein;that
said newspaper has been published continuously and
uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin for a period
of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior
to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or
advertisement.
The Aspen Times is an accepted legal advertising
medium, only for jurisdictions operating under
Colorado's Home Rule provision.
That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was
published in the regular and entire issue of every
number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1
consecutive insertions;and that the first publication
of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper
dated 2/28/2013 and that the last publication of
said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated
2/28/2013.
In witness whereof,I have here unto set my hand
this 03/15/2013.
Jim Morgan,General Manager
Subscribed and sworn to before me,a notary public
in and for the County of Garfield,State of Colorado
this 03/15/2013.
Mary E.Borkenhagen,Notary Public
Commission expires:September 12,2015
o y BO.....
Gt
NOTgRr i
0Y/gLIC s
COLOR* b
pnnmm,b
EeyirM
265
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
March 18, 2020
Amy Simon
Interim Planning Director
City of Aspen
130 So. Galena St.
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Aspen Valley Hospital (AVH) Extension of Vested Rights
401 Castle Creek Road
Ms. Simon:
Please accept this request to extend the period of statutory vested rights for Phase IV of the
Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan. The Aspen Valley Hospital District Master
Facilities Plan approval is a large scale, multi-year project that involves significant expansions of
not only the main Hospital building but also infrastructure and campus improvements. The Project
received multiple previous land use approvals, including amendments, to expand the Hospital in
a series of four construction phases. Construction of Phases I through III are complete, with Phase
IV construction still outstanding and in of need of completion. In total, the AVH Facilities Master
Plan approved a total of 214,000 square feet of gross floor. Each of the four (4) phases were
allocated specific amounts of the total gross floor area. Of the four phases, Phase IV represents
the smallest amount with 8,575 square feet of floor area, or 4% of the project total.
The property is located at
0401 Castle Creek Road and
is owned by the Aspen Valley
Hospital District, a quasi-
municipal corporation and
political subdivision of
the State of the Colorado.
Elaine Gerson, General
Counsel for Aspen Valley
Hospital, has authorized
BendonAdams to represent
AVH’s interests in this
vested rights extension
request. The property
is legally described as
the Aspen Valley
Hospital Subdivision
Parcel C, and Tract F,
with parcel ID no.
2735-123-07-801. Figure 1: Site Plan of approved Phases I thru IV:
266
Aspen Valley Hospital, 401 Castle Creek Road
Extension of Vested Rights
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
The Aspen Valley Hospital expansion has been funded through a variety of mechanisms including
a Hospital Taxing District mill levy and significant funding donations. For the completion of Phase
IV to begin, additional fundraising is needed, which in turn, necessitates additional time. Given
the large scope of the expansion project, AVH has invested significant funds in the implementation
and construction of the Hospital Master Facilities Plan. The Aspen Valley Hospital District overall
has approximately $148.8m invested in the campus. In completion of Phase 3 alone,
approximately $64.8m has been invested. The completion of Phases I through III and the
significant financial investments in the expanded campus show substantial progress made
pursuing the project.
Final City Council approval for Phases III and IV were combined into a single approval document,
Ordinance 6, Series 2013. Phase IV is the subject of this extension request and was specifically
approved for an 1,854 square foot basement level and 6,721 square foot “Level One” for a total
of 8,575 square feet of floor area. This square footage translates into future Phase IV construction
of the AVH Outpatient Clinic, a central registration area, a new main entrance, AVH Foundation
Offices, a Chapel, and a Café expansion.
Section 17: Vested Rights of Ordinance 6, Series 2013 granted a seven (7) year vesting period
for Phases III and IV. Vesting for Phases III and IV are set to expire on May 23, 2020. We are
requesting the vested rights associated with Phase IV only be extended for a five (5) year period
to May 23, 2025. Approval of this extension would allow additional time for fundraising, to refine
estimates, and evaluate financial costs associated with initiating the final phase of AVH
construction. All other aspects of the Phase IV Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities
Plan remain unchanged and no amendments are requested. Phase IV will be constructed as
approved by the City in 2013.
The following details the land use history for Phases I through IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital
District Master Facilities Plan:
Conceptual PUD, Facilities Master Plan, and Rezoning: City Council Resolution 3, Series 2009
(approves 4 phases of development)
Phase II Final PUD approval:
• City Council Ordinance 12, Series 2010 (Reception No. 572613)
• Subdivision Improvements Agreement (Reception No. 576523)
• Notice of Approval for an Amendment to clarify off-site affordable housing requirements,
Certificate of Occupancy issuance, and design changes (Reception No. 591369).
• Notice of Approval for Amendments to solar panel height, increased height for mechanical,
additional parking, clarification on parking counts, reduced spacing between lamp posts
(Reception No. 580971)
• Phase II Final Plat: B95 PG64
• Affordable Housing Agreement: Reception No. 593106
Phase III and IV Final PUD:
• Planning and Zoning Resolution No. 2, Series 2013
• City Council Ordinance 6, Series 2013 (Reception. No. 600720)
• Planned Unit development Agreement (PUD): Reception No. 608884
• Notice of Approval for Amendment to defer certain aspects of the project and Incidental
design changes to the ambulance garage Reception No. 62250
267
Aspen Valley Hospital, 401 Castle Creek Road
Extension of Vested Rights
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
• Notice of Approval for an Amendment to reconfigure floor area (Reception No. 633493)
• Phase III and IV Final Plat: BK106 PG27 (Reception No. 608883)
General Amendments:
• Notice of Approval for amending retaining walls, staircase, shorting, and access
(Reception No. 651836)
• Notice of Approval for parking size variation (Reception No. 651835)
Master Signage Plan:
• Notice of Approval for signs (Reception No. 622521)
Wireless Communication Facility:
• Notice of Approval (Reception No. 604775)
• Notice of Approval: (Reception No. 644991)
AVH Plats Amendments:
• Minor Plat Amendment to create and vacate certain easements: BK123 PG69
Ambulance Facility:
• Major Public Project Review approval: Ordinance No. 9, Series 2018
Attached please find the project approvals and relevant documents required for a complete
application. Given the history and scope of the Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan, to
reduce the size of the application submittal, we have attached previous land use decisions
pertaining only to Phases III and IV. Upon request, BendonAdams can provide copies of all
previous land use decisions. We look forward to discussing this request with you and the City
Council. Please contact us with any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Chris Bendon, AICP
BendonAdams LLC
Attachments:
1. Response to Review Criteria
2. Land Use Application and Dimensional Requirements Form
3. Pre-Application conference summary
4. Authorization to represent and disclosure of ownership
5. Agreement to pay form
6. HOA compliance form
7. Vicinity Map
8. List of owners within 300 ft.
9. Planning and Zoning Resolution No. 2, Series of 2013
10. City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013
11. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement for Phase III and Phase IV Reception No.
608884
268
Exhibit 1
Response to Review Criteria
26.308.010.C.1 In reviewing a request for the extension or reinstatement of vested rights the City
Council shall consider, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
a. The applicant’s compliance with any conditions requiring performance prior to the date of
application for extension or reinstatement;
Response: We have secured all required land use approvals for the final phase of construction and, to
date, have fulfilled all conditions of the development order. Any outstanding requirements identified in
the Subdivision Improvements Agreement (SIA) and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement will be
fulfilled, as required. Any other remaining matters are detailed issues typically addressed as part of the
building permit review or construction observation. In consideration of this request, Section 3 of City
Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009 anticipates as much as a 20 year build-out timeline for Aspen Valley
Hospital. City Council at the time clearly acknowledged the timeframe associated with the full completion
of the Hospital campus. As such, the current vested rights extension request is in concert with the 2009
approval.
b. The progress made in pursuing the project to date including the effort to obtain any other
permits, including a building permit and the expenditures made by the applicant in
pursuing the project;
Response: Phases I through III are complete with Phase IV in need of completion. We have invested
significant funds in the implementation and construction of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Plan.
Overall, the Aspen Valley Hospital District has approximately $148.8m invested in the campus.
Specifically, in completion of Phase 3, approximately $64.8m has been invested. The completion of
Phases I through III and the significant financial investments in the campus show substantial progress
made pursuing the project.
Additionally, the entire Hospital Facilities Master Plan was approved for a total of 214,000 square feet of
gross floor area. Phase IV, the last phase of the project, was allocated for 8,575 square feet which
represents only 4% of the total floor area for the entire Hospital campus development.
c. The nature and extent of any benefits already received by the City as a result of the
project approval such as impact fees or land dedications;
Response: With the construction and completion of Phases I through III, the City has exacted and received
impact fees, including affordable housing mitigation. Appropriate and required impact associated with
Phase IV will be exacted at the time of building permit submittal.
269
d. The needs of the City and the applicant that would be served by the approval of the
extension or reinstatement request.
Response: An additional 5 years is requested to refine estimates and evaluate financial costs associated
with Phase IV. The requested extension will also allow additional time to explore fundraising mechanisms
for the project. Granting this extension will serve the City of Aspen by providing additional time for the
full completion of the Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan, as approved by City Council.
Completion of Phase IV and the full completion of the Hospital Facilities is a clear community benefit that
will serve Aspen and the greater Roaring Fork Valley.
270
November 2017 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LAND USE APPLICATION
Project Name and Address:_________________________________________________________________________
Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) _____________________________
APPLICANT:
Name: ______________________________________________________________________________________________
Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Phone #: ___________________________ email: __________________________________
REPRESENTIVATIVE:
Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
Address:________________________________________________________________________________________________
Phone#: _____________________________ email:___________________________________
Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions
Review: Administrative or Board Review
Have you included the following?FEES DUE: $ ______________
Pre-Application Conference Summary
Signed Fee Agreement
HOA Compliance form
All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary
Required Land Use Review(s):
Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields:
Net Leasable square footage _________ Lodge Pillows______ Free Market dwelling units ______
Affordable Housing dwelling units_____ Essential Public Facility square footage ________
Extension of Vested Rights, Phase IV Aspen Valley Hospital. 401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611
273512307801
401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611
970-544-1422 egerson@aspenhospital.org
Chris Bendon. BendonAdams, LLC
300 S. Spring Street Suite #202 Aspen, CO 81611
970-925-2855 chris@bendonadams.com
A 5 year extension of vested rights is requested for land use approvals associated with Phase IV of theAspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan.
City Council Review
Extension of Vested Rights
0 0 0
00
1,300.00
xx
xx
Aspen Valley Hospital, Elaine Gerson-General Counsel for AVH
Exhibit 2
271
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
November 2017 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project and Location ____________________________________________________________________
Applicant: ____________________________________________________________________________
Gross Lot Area: __________Zone Zone District: _______ Net Lot Area: __________
Please fill out all relevant dimensions
Single Family and Duplex Residential
Existing Allowed Proposed
1) Floor Area (square feet)
2) Maximum Height
3) Front Setback
4) Rear Setback
5) Side Setbacks
6) Combined Side Setbacks
7) % Site Coverage
8) Minimum distance between buildings
Proposed % of demolition ______
Commercial
Proposed Use(s)____________________
Existing Allowed Proposed
1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio)
2) Floor Area (square feet)
3) Maximum Height
4) Off-Street Parking Spaces
5) Second Tier (square feet)
6) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet)
Proposed % of demolition ______
Existing non-conformities or encroachments:
Variations requested:
**Please refer to section 26.575.020 for information on how to calculate Net Lot Area
Multi-family Residential
Existing Allowed Proposed
1) Number of Units
2) Parcel Density (see 26.710.090.C.10)
3) FAR (Floor Area Ratio)
4) Floor Area (square feet)
4) Maximum Height
5) Front Setback
6) Rear Setback
7) Side Setbacks
Proposed % of demolition ______
Lodge
Additional Use(s)____________________
Existing Allowed Proposed
1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio)
2) Floor Area (square feet)
3)Maximum Height
4)Free Market Residential(square feet)
4) Front setback
5) Rear setback
6) Side setbacks
7) Off-Street Parking Spaces
8) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet)
Proposed % of demolition ______
Complete only if required by the PreApplication checklist
Extension of Vested Rights, 401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611
Aspen Valley Hospital
PUB
None requested
None requested
Per PUD
See PD (attached)See PD (attached)
272
City C970
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
LOCATION: 401 Castle Creek, Aspen Valley Hospital
PROJECT: Extension of Vested Rights
REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, 925.2855
PLANNER: Jim Pomeroy, 970.429.2745
DATE: March 2, 2020
DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is desirous of extending the vested rights for Phase III &
Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital redevelopment. The vested rights for Phase III &
Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital redevelopment were established pursuant to
Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013. Currently, vested rights for the project expire on May 23rd,
2020, unless further extended beyond this date. After the period of vested rights,
current land use regulations become applicable to the project, unless an extension is
granted.
Land Use Code Section(s)
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.308 Vested Rights
Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your
convenience:
Land Use Application
Land Use Code
Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application
and recommendation, City Council for decision.
Public Hearing: Yes, City Council
Planning Fees: $1,300: Deposit for up to 4 billable hours. Lesser/additional
hours will be refunded or billed at a rate of $325 per hour
Exhibit 3
273
Referrals: No
Total Deposit: $1,300
Please submit an electronic digital copy of all of the following documents in
PDF file format to the Community Development Office:
Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement.
Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).
Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is
proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate
from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or
attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all
owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements,
contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s
right to apply for the Development Application.
Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the
applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the
representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.
HOA Compliance form (Attached).
A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or
model form of how the proposed development complies with the review
standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use
approvals associated with the property.
An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be
submitted:
Total deposit for review of the application.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The
summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon
factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not
create a legal or vested right.
274
Exhibit 4
275
Exhibit 5
276
Exhibit 6
277
Exhibit 7
278
Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius
Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web
site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to
ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic
system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral
estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County
does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners.
Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning
the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this
site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and
reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the
user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and
liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or
data obtained on this web site.
This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be
printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to
page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the
margins such that they no longer line up on the labels
sheet. Print actual size.
From Parcel: 273512307801 on 03/12/2020
Instructions:
Disclaimer:
http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com
Exhibit 8
279
KELEHER LINDA BUREAU TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
202 MEADOWOOD DR
HEATHER LANE LLC
HOUSTON, TX 77056-2004
5379 LYNBROOK DR
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
CASTLE RIDGE ASSOCIATES LTD
ST ANN, MO 63074
PO BOX 95
RINTOUL AMY V
ASPEN, CO 81611
161 GROVE CT
KRET LORI A & COLE JEFFREY M
ASPEN, CO 81611
262 GROVE CT
ANGUS CRAIG M & KAREN S
ASPEN, CO 81611
PO BOX 7965
ASPEN CHAPEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
77 MEADOWOOD DR
KREUTZER GARY REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
109 TWIN RIDGE DR
LEE BRUCE LANDON
ASPEN, CO 81612
141 GROVE CT
MEANS GRAEME DONALD & ELIZABETH C
ASPEN, CO 81611-3341
189 MEADOWOOD DR
TWIN RIDGE HOA
ASPEN, CO 81611
363 GROVE CT
PODHURST AARON S QPRT 50%
MIAMI, FL 33131
ONE S.E. THIRD AVE #2300
WALLA JOHN D & JEAN D
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 161
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
ASPEN, CO 81611
0401 CASTLE CREEK RD
PATTERSON PATRICIA O REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
499 MEADOWOOD DR
POLOVIN DAVID L
ASPEN, CO 816113140
363 GROVE ST
KIERNAN MARC
ASPEN, CO 81611
161 GROVE CT
KREUTZER DEBBIE REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
109 TWIN RIDGE DR
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
MACLEAN ARCHIBALD JR & ANNE
ASPEN, CO 81611
90 TWIN RIDGE DR
RYMAN KAREN L
ASPEN, CO 81611
343 GROVE CT
FRIAS RAYMOND C & MARILYN F
ASPEN, CO 81611
100 MEADOWOOD DR
HOOD JEFFREY M
ASPEN, CO 81611
121 GROVE CT
MEADOWOOD METROPOLITAN DIST
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 8774
MOREHEAD RONALD L & ERLINDA M
ASPEN, CO 81611
128 TWINRIDGE CT
TWIN RIDGE HOA
ASPEN, CO 81611
363 GROVE CT
JACKSON MEADOWS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
437 MEADOWOOD DR
HEGER FRANK & CARLA
ASPEN, CO 81611-3139
222 GROVE CT
PROCHASKA JUDITH ELLEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
108 TWIN RIDGE LN 280
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
TWIN RIDGE TOWNHOMES ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
121 GROVE CT
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
KELEHER JOHN GORRY TRUST
ASPEN, CO 816113336
202 MEADOWOOD DR
FORD JOHN
ASPEN, CO 81611
188 MEADOWOOD DR
LAHR DANIEL & RACHEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
323 GROVE CT
CROSS SUSAN K
ASPEN, CO 81611-3139
242 GROVE CT
GIBSONE ALEXANDER S
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 GROVE CT # 9
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
LYONS MICHAEL J & JENNIFER C
ASPEN, CO 81611
74 TWIN RIDGE DR
MTN OAKS EMPLOYEE HSING
ASPEN, CO 81611
200 CASTLE CREEK RD
PODHURST DOROTHY E QPRT 50%
MIAMI, FL 33131
ONE S.E. THIRD AVE #2300
ASPEN CHAPEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
77 MEADOWOOD DR
WEISS CLIFFORD A & STACEY L
ASPEN, CO 81611
202 GROVE CT
PATTERSON PAUL T REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
499 MEADOWOOD DR
LOBO DA CUNHA MARINA G
ASPEN, CO 81611
121 GROVE CT
ONEIL DENNIS & SHARON
ASPEN, CO 81611-3134
101 GROVE CT
281
RESOLUTION NO. 2
SERIES OF 2013)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APPROVING A COMMERCIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW,
ESTABLISHING EMPLOYEE GENERATION FOR AN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC
FACILITY, AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT FOR PHASES III AND IV OF THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL
DISTRICT MASTER FACILITIES PLAN, LOCATED ON PARCEL C, ASPEN
VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 401
CASTLE CREEK ROAD,CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel ID: 2735-121-29-809
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the
Aspen Valley Hospital District (Applicant), represented by Leslie Lamont of Lamont Planning
Services, requesting approval of a Final Development Plan and associated land use reviews for a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Phases III and IV the Aspen Valley Hospital District
Master Facilities Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Conceptual PUD approval (via Resolution No. 3, Series of 2009)
conceptually approved a redeveloped and expanded multi-story hospital building and parking
garage, medical office space, affordable housing and site improvements on Parcel C of the Aspen
Valley Hospital Subdivision, to be developed in four phases; and,
WHEREAS, the Conceptual PUD approval outlined the employee generation rate to use
in evaluation of the medical office space as well as the anticipated employees generated for the
hospital function; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed
Final PUD and associated land use reviews for Phases III and IV and recommended approval
with conditions; and,
WHEREAS, during a meeting on October 30, 2012, the Planning and Zoning
Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and continued the
public hearing to November 20, 2012 for further discussion. At the November 20, 2012 public
hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider
the project and continued the hearing until December 4, 2012 for further discussion. At the
December 4, 2012 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the project and continued the public hearing to January 8, 2013 for
further discussion. At the January 8, 2013 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission
opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and approved a growth management
quota system review for Expansion or new commercial development, establishment of the
employee generation rate for an essential public facility and recommended City Council approve
the Final Planned Unit Development application for Phase III and IV by a six to one (6-1) vote,
with the findings and conditions listed hereinafter; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution No. 2, Series 2013
Page 1 of 4
Exhibit 9
282
Section 1: General Approvals
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Growth Management Review for Expansion
or New Commercial Development for the medical office space and recommends City Council
approve Growth Management Review for an Essential Public Facility as well as Final Planned
Unit Development for Phases III and IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan.
Specifically, this approval and recommendations of approval permit the Applicant to develop
Phases III and IV of a four phase master facilities plan inclusive of 10,187 sq. ft. of net leasable
commercial and office space for the development of medical offices and an expansion of the
hospital facility by 72,828 gross square feet(excluding the medical office space).
Section 2• Growth Management Allotments
The Applicant requested 27,000 sq. ft. of net leasable commercial and office space from the 2010
annual allotment allowance for commercial development. This allotment request represented the
total net leasable square feet necessary to construct the entire master facilities plan over the
course of the proposed four phases of development. The Planning and Zoning Commission
granted 12,000 sq. ft. of net leasable commercial and office space from the 2010 growth
management year for Phase Il, leaving a balance of 15,000 sq. ft. to potentially be requested in
subsequent phases in later years.
With this resolution, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants 10,187 sq. ft. of commercial
net leasable space for Phase III rather than the 15,000 originally anticipated. The commercial
space is determined to generate 16.95 employees. An additional 64,253 gross sq. ft. of essential
public facility for the hospital function of the building is requested for Phase III which generates
20.16 employees. City Council determines the mitigation requirement for the Essential Public
Facility Growth Management review, based on the Planning and Zoning Commission's finding
herein that 20.16 employees are generated by the hospital function of Phase I1I. Housing
Mitigation is required for the greater of the two mitigation requirements, which will be
memorialized in any City Council ordinance for Phase III.
Phase IV proposes 8,575 gross sq. ft. of essential public facility for the hospital function of the
building which generates 8.46 employees. Housing Mitigation for Phase IV will also be outlined
in any City Council ordinance, based on City Council's Essential Public Facility Growth
Management review.
As memorialized in the conceptual PUD approval for this project (Section 2.0 and Exhibit B of
Resolution No. 3, Series of 2009), an existing credit shall be applied to the employee generation
for each phase of development.
Section 3• Dimensional Requirements and Other Recommendations
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to City Council that the redevelopment of
the property in Phases III and IV as presented shall meet the dimensional standards as outlined in
the exhibits of this resolution.
Additionally, the Commission recommends that the following suggestions be incorporated into
the Final PUD approval.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution No. 2, Series 2013
Page 2 of 4
283
a. An additional pedestrian access way is incorporated into the site plan as shown in Exhibit 1.
b. A lighting plan, as presented in Exhibit K of the Planning and Zoning memo dated January 8,
2013, be developed and adopted that outlines all remediation techniques that will be undertaken
for lighting that has been installed on the site as well as the design of any additional outdoor
lighting in Phases III and IV to minimize undesirable brightness and light trespass. Additionally,
the Commission recommends Council carefully consider requiring light shades on any new two
story component and require an interior lighting plan be developed for the interior of the entry
proposed for Phase IV as expansive amounts of glass are proposed and light trespass should be
minimized.
c. Carefully consider additional landscaping to screen the parking garage improvements and
minimize visual impacts to neighbors and the community and as seen from Castle Creek Road.
Section 4•
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development
proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before
the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals
and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized
entity.
Section 5•
This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 6•
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 8th day of
January, 2013.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING D ZONING
7
CO IS
Deb Quinn,Assistant City Attorney J,Eripamer, Ch 'r
ATTEST:
ackie Lothian,Deputy City Clerk
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution No.2, Series 2013
Page 3 of 4
284
Exhibit I —Pedestrian access improvement
Exhibit 2—Height plan
Exhibit 3— Mechanical plan
Exhibit 4—Master phasing plan
Exhibit S—Floor plans
Exhibit 6—Exterior elevations
Planning and Zoning Commission
Resolution No.2, Series 2013
Page 4 of 4
285
j GUARD RAIL i 1
OUTDOOR DINING TERRACE 1 ALONG FULL
SEE PCU ENTRY 1 LENGTH OF
ENLARGEMENT PLAN, UPPER WALL
SHEET L-1.3 P
RETAINING l1WALLSSEE
1j1CIVILSHEET
CG-105 ANDLqSTRUCTURAL
ENGINEER'S
0
DRAWINGS.
EXISTING SURFACE PARKING'
IMPROVEMENTS 2
TO RTOREMAINAIN 77 PARKING IMPROVEMENT)
SPACES NOTE:
1 1) THIS DIAGRAM IS
I
EXCERPTED FROM SHEET
L-1.0 OF THE PHASE 2
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT
SET.
24 EXISTING
I
PARKING
T-
1 1 2) THIS DIAGRAM DEPICTS
SPACES TO PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY
REMAIN CURB RAMP&SIDEWALK I IMPROVEMENTS AS PROPOSED
FOR COMPLETION WITH PHASE
EXISTING PAINTED CROSSWALK 7/ 1 2 CONSTRUCTION.
EUPA 6'WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALKTOOREMAINWITHADACURBRAMPS j
RAW WATER CONNECTION
AND IRRIGATION PUMP I
PAD; SEE IRRIGATION j, 1
CROSS- -
REALIGNED HOSPITALWALK ' TRAIL STOP SIGN, SEE NOIES
PAINTED SHEET 11.2
AVH LOOP ROAD REALIGNED PEDESTRIAN ENTRY ROAD, SEE CIVIL
TRAIL SHEET CS-102 1
IMPROVED
TRAIL CROSSING
TRAIL STOP SIGN, SEE NOTES o
i
GUARD RAIL AT DOOLITTLE DRIVE a
REQUIRED AT CONCRETE RETAINING WALLS GREATER o
40' THAN 30" IN HEIGHT AT HHS PARKING LOT AND NEW
RFTA STOP. SEE CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR TOW/BOW.
140 TO DETERMINE EXTENTS OF GUARD RAIL. COORDINATE m CASILE CRE
STEEL GUARD RAIL INSTALLATION WITH PREFABRICATED
SHELTERS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH FALL
IMPROV ECMEN KEY PLAN
PROTECTION CODES.
1
i SHEET CS-1
pedestrian access revision exhibit - phase 2
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL M.F.P. 12 . 2012 1 of 2
286
LEGEND
I! TUMBLED CONCRETE PAVERS s
S I
PERVIOUS PAVING)
LA` , CAFETERIA PATIO
SPECIALTY PAVING (INTEGRAL
OUTDOOR CHAPEL COLOR CONCRETE)
CHAPEL GARDEN) O CONCRETE
Q O O CRUSHER FINES PATHEENTTERRN
SURFACE PARKING
PHASE 2 I LANDSCAPE AREA
IMPROVEMENT)
MAIN I PHASE 3-4 APPROXIMATE
ENTRY LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SEE GRADING PLAN
EXCLUDES LIMITS OF
l I INTERIOR RENOVATION)
gym....,PUBLIC NOTE: THIS DIAGRAM IS
MERGENCY
4 I ENTRY/CURB RAMP EXCERPTED FROM SHEET L-2.0
OM ENTRY DIRECTIONAL OF THE PHASE 3/4 FINAL PUD
16 SURFACE
SIGNAGE (T.B.D PAINTED CROSSWALK I APPLICATION SUBMITTAL AND
1 ILLUSTRATES
PARKING SPACES
PEDESTRIAN
I
CONNECTIVITY AT FULL
BUILD—OUT.
1 6 WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
WITH ADA CURB RAMPS C]
I
PAINTED CROSSWALK
l
r Ir
LOOP ROAD
r
AVH SERVICE LOOP
ROAD
W'a':..
i
H.H.S.PARKING y
h
n7
Tr0l=ffl0=:=]40 I
I KEY PLAN
pedestrian access revision exhibit - phases 3/4
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL M.F.P. 12 . 2012 2 of 2
287
Its
m
mom
PP
A
E)
W.
RMTU
RIM p
zoz................
JG)
6-
9
r-
IK1xx.,
00
ti
ti
288
design
I{pgty lnleNN,IpeN hk.
B2018M Shoe,Mall,
a Suim 200,
CO W202 3219
MSa20. 6.02]8
wqM
1121900
ASPEN VALLEY
HOSPITAL
PHASE 3
ADDITION/EXPANSION
MGt CLawI GeM ROeo
t
n raper,Co Bt611
ewtwu li I anagen
x. y.:: aanlcoern•
mEIIINe®wI
ac
o.ame
wl ww a,>a,
a.ausy etwe
suovenwlewww xr
terwelavweelNm
n
w.R,
r
w6wFpwlw Fa.aaol a
wNNN9Im o'CONSTRUCTION
mw
DRAWINGS aa>o o,
a
Hell+ mre
a w.
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
y
PHASE 4
LEGEND
fiT FI.00X ELEV..,00'L-•I16G4 901:.5
E1:EIEVATIGN m r RF0•PfiOVE FINISH GR
II1'A"PEGI—EXISTING OWE
I:eS pWn
sMet Mlle
OVERALL ROOF
PLAN
eNeaI INNNer
waaa,hl, ,N
PUD
289
l[Rlf
Sy / LOPED OVERFRAMING W,
SNGLE PLY MEMBRANE E Y
61
HT ABOVE ROOF 12'-T
ROOF W!EXTRUDED RIBS
sT,6
T Tl 73:F:Y-i'i7
EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING Wl
SLOPED OVERFRAMING W! SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF WI
SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF FX`RUDED RIBS
1
Wl EXTRUDED RIBS
I
EXIST. EXIST.
COURTYARD COURTYARD
10
EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING W
SINC1E-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W'i
EXTRUDEDRIBS
340 34-G'
RERACEORTU REPLACED RTU §
HT ABOVE ROOF iPa"
SLOPED OVERFRAMING W!SINGLE-PLY
HT ABOVE ROOF T'$' MEMBRANE ROOF W/EXTRUDED RIBS
ADHERED TPO MEMBRANE J
ROOFING WI TAPERED SLOPED OVERFRAMING WI SINGLE-PLY
NS"TION ;' MEMBRANE ROOF WI EXTRUDED RIBS 4q4r
SKYLIGHT HT ABOVE ROOFIO
ELEVATION
14 AEG)
40-W
SCREEN WALL
ELEVATION
ATIAFG
16.0-AEG) INC/
HT ABOVE ROOF 1 O
r^
HELPAD --
r
i"ie
290
I DfSIGN
design
Heery International Inc.
820 16th Street Mall,
Suite 200,
Denver,CO 80202-3219
720.946.0276
1
1
7th'project number
CASTLE CREEK ROAD
I —————
Af
1121900
A BUS STOP \ 11..
A S P E N V A L L E Y
PEDESTRIAN DOOLITTLE DRIVE H O S P I T A L
TRAIL
111111 PHASE 3 AND 4HI
PAR
II II
iIII III II 1
KING
I
PARKINHIM -- --
o
I
STRUCTU_
RI
E
I I
I
I
VIT
ADDITION/EXPANSION\ --- —
hIOSPITAL BUILDI1NG
1STORMWATER
IMANAGEMENTIlu
BASIN \
0401 Castle Creek Road
SHOWN Aspen,Cc 81611
p /
EMPLOY
G
X1;11
L—_ .,r;:.;I,.. r.®—
0
I
1
Q 1 consulC—n
Wconstruction
managers
ug LOADING /
1
swa ual corewla".lrc. onto rx pe
i 340DOCK
yi/ /
j C 8020
Ave.%300 311 Main 51. 102
008
303 399 5157 11 703 373.9601 970,963 6520 If 910 963 6522
B 2G IV. 1920 Ma"
Arvada CO 02
u1e 200 19201f,
CO 1202 201
I
1 1303433 ew61
70]422.74001(3034127900 303/77.9500 I 307437.5624
WHITCOMB t 1 01JRFAOE R'
CEO I v 1 TERRACE G 1 —`ARKING
RESIDENCE
1 j / i Caftn le,CO 8062IF1ICarboMek,
11
99703
J 1 a wore sin/ro1o1a4.o717
seallsignature
NORDIC TRAIL iiii. O I
issued for date
PHASE 3
LOADING FINAL PUD AUGUST 10,2012
DOCK
item date
E I4~
AVH LOOP ROAD EXISTING
AMBULANCE/
I
CASTLE CREEK ROAD
BARN_
DOOLITTL = RIVE
lit I?
ARO I PLAN NORTH
I 117,
IIIQ
II LEGEND
O
a"/
SCALE:1"_B0' .
o t PHASE 1
PHASE 1
BUILDING
NOTE:THIS SHEET IS PROVIDED TO
I ILLUSTRATE THE VARIOUS PHASES OF
CEO PHASE 2
RESIDENCE I PHASE 2 BUILDING
THE EXPANSION AND RENOVATION OF
C ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL AND IS
EMPLOYEE O I
HOUSING
INTENDED AS A DIAGRAMATIC
WHITCOMB HOSPITAL BUILDING
PHASE 3 REFERENCE ONLY.
sheet tine
TERRACE SHOWN AT FULL
PHASE 3 Wins] BUILDING
BUILD-OUT)
MASTER SITE
SITE DIAGRAM I PHASING DIAGRAM
NOT TO SCALE PHASE4
PHASE 4 BUILDING
EXISTING
u a R
PHASE LIMITS/
HOSPITAL LIMITS OF D
sheet number
AVH LOOP ROAD \-- I BUILDING
DISTURBANCE 1 — O
PRE-PUD)
AMBULANCE I a" drawn by checked by
BARN w"
a
v
291
LEGEND
CIRCULATION PUBLIC design
CIRCULATION: STAFF/PATIENT
NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT/EXPANSION LOADING
CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINT/RENOVATION DOCK
T
Heery International Inc.
ELEVATOR:PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE 82016th Street Mall,
Suite 200,
ELEVATOR.STAFF/PATIENT Denver,CO 80202-3219
EXTENT OF PHASE 1
720.946.0276
APPROVED AND COMPLETED C project number
EXTENT OF PHASE 2 r---..._._....
1121900
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION I —^
EXTENT OF PHASE 3 E WIN
A S P E N V A L L E Y13APPROVEDANDCURRENTLYUNDERCONSTRUCTION
H O S P I T A LEXTENTOFPHASE4
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION I 1
PHASE 3 AND 4
I ADDITION/EXPANSION
i 0401 Castle Creek Road
E Aspen,Co 81611
r consultants/construction managers
Buuchfel C-11I l,c OHM Design
0
3400 East
8WO9Ave,
0300
Ci
I Man St,Suite 1023400E
CO a9299
311mad4St
CO 123
303343.51541 f 303 373,9501 970.903.65201 f 970963 6522
L_...___..._... f
d BCEREn o..q GA-S-
t - 5420 Wxd R.d,SuiL 200 1920 Wftl Sl.SI201
A-da.C060002 Denver,C060202
303.422.74001 f 303.422.7900 303433.950011303433.5624
I...—....—... Saga EnpY..Q
o LOBBY 502M4n 5100806
O
I
9mbmdeb,11 f 970 7970.701-0311 I i 970704.0317
seal/signature
I
MECHANI AL
OJ
D
DDElL, issued for date
5rr EE ING PHASE 314
k UN R OBBY ROO S FINAL PUD AUGUST 10,2012
vl
item date
L----------.-...--RGE
EETINC
t......._._.__._.___. OOM
SHELL SPACE
PLAN NORTH
SCALE:1"=30'
key plan
sheet title
BASEMENT
LEVEL
AF-100
sheet number
Y checked bdrawnb Y
erMw.na.rr,.y Nr,we,sam,wgwwa.ba.wat WO Croy,0,10mi r.
292
LEGEND design
CIRCULATION. PUBLIC
CIRCULATION STAFFIPATIENT
NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT/EXPANSION
CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINTIRENOVATION Heery International Inc.
820
ELEVATOR.PUBLIC Suite
iStreet
Mall,
ELEVATOR.STAFF/PATIENT Denver,CO 80202-3219
LOADING I 720948.0276
EXTENT OF PHASE 1 4w
iT
APPROVED AND COMPLETED DOCK project number
EXTENT OF PHASE 2 i 1121900
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
EXTENT OF PHASE 3
L\
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION L HEALING —" A S P E N V A L L E Y
EXTENT OF PHASE 4
H O S Pi T A LLGARDEN
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION G
PPO I \ —
PHASE 3 AND 4
RV
ADDITION/EXPANSION
A
N BIKE
0401 Castle Creek Road
C TRAIL Aspen,Co 81611
U u
KIENSCA c"nsultants,CAnstn OtiDn managers
I
14011nl
B ya
dn61ne
311
Design
De 0
802D9Aw,
tl300 311Main SI,
C08102
3033 5154
if9 9M96Mak.
0097D3f' 303 3R5154 l f 303.333.950' 970%3.652011970.963.652.
BOER Ergi
ll IMM.
ww
5020 Ward MeE,5u:le 200 1920 kaM145L SuAe 2D,
Ary da CO 8=2 Dewer,0060202COURTARD30342214N11303422.7900 333.433950011303433.5620
Sopis Erg--%
njj 502 Main 5,Suite A3
9LOBB11L
Cmbdda a,CO 623
Y 970 la ml u l roio4 e3n
ED.seallsignature
S CU ENTRANCEg
r ' ! '
0 DROP-0BORARY
S ICI[
J T
NI
issued for date
AF PHASE 3/4
FINAL PUD AUGUST 10,2012
G
item date
MBULANCE jiff
T Y C AP
ARAGE 8 '
1711`
1
ROP OFF
OUTD00
1 LOBBY DINING ,' EA s
EC
r
LIC O
ILE
IN ENTRANCE PLAN NORTH
n
i R
SCALE:1"=30'
o L L
M GENCY UDZRTMENTn
DROP-OF
kev plan
sheet title
LEVEL ONE
AF-101
sheet number
drawn by checked by
293
LEGEND design
CIRCULATION:PUBLIC
CIRCULATION: STAFFIPATIENT
NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT/EXPANSION
CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINT/RENOVATION Heery International Inc.
820 Street Mall,
ELEVATOR:PUBLIC Suite 200
ELEVATOR:STAFF/PATIENT Denver,CO 80202-3219
720.946.0276
EXTENT OF PHASE 1
APPROVED AND COMPLETED
I O o project number
3 EXTENT OF PHASE 2 1121900
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
EXTENT OF PHASE 313APPROVEDANDCURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
ROOF
1
A S P E N V A L L E Y
H O S P I T A L
EXTENT OF PHASE 4
APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTIONS PHASE 3 AND 4
ADDITION/EXPANSION
ROOF
AB 0401 Castle Creek Road
O
0a
Aspen,Co 81611
consullants/constructionrnanagers
SV dwrw Cgnsu4enb ii,. OHM Desl9n
0 3400 East SayaW Ave,4300 311 Main St,5We102
Dei—„COWM caroa4ae.co61623
303.399.51541 f 303333.9501 970.963.65AI f 9709636522
COURTYARD
SE E q— Dens
COURT-s4z9wemanae.suim zoa 7920 Na1kel SlSWe 201
i YARD 3fWt4001W1303.422.7900 303.439`950001100.3433.SR4
Sef4k ErV-rLg
502 Man Sl SuA A3
970
C090623
9707019Jif 11970.704.0313
seal/signature
MEDICAL
OFFICE
SPACE ROOF
t®
issued for date
T PHASE 3/4
FINAL PUD AUGUST 10,2012
OOF
item date
j
i
OPEN TO BELOW
OPF
o00
o LO BY
i l
HEL AD b
PLAN NORTH
1 SCALE:1"=30'
key plan
sheet title
LEVEL Two
she.,number
AF-102
drawn by checked by
r,.".:i.:b,.w-r,•+M-tom.K..o,w.s...,°.,x+ ew„y,.ero w»........°w K.,°e m.,b
294
HEERY 1- 1
aaa aoaaaa.oaaaa•ao. ,rp I '; I.,l ilt W 9111 1
n-_-•• _•_--_- __''11y11111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111,llllllllllllllll llllilllll IIII Illllill;lll:,l'I,,, ' ,
id so s a .a..a a
a 7 i91 1 t li¢rds llaaasI_ .
sae_v •.a.ii iilii.i.itii ir
m W1a1 Iiiinii.o uu.u.aaT u g ,,L.p;u u a9_9 _ s-•w.., 1 • NIl/RlUl1 IIIII011 ,N111IIIW i1@ 111NrI„ VIII IIIIIIIIBII
i u 1". ti I'
v ,
I
I IIIIIIWIIIIIIIIIII119111YIIIIIII01 ,I gg I Iii!i I i. I I pp
A A A - 7 "".:. i , i 1 1',dr ' ' ''ili';I j l'II I i. l'!',I''I r
i
I lk
El
NOTE:OXYGEN PAD STRUCTURE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY
I I WWI -111
NORTH ELEVATION
II'f'Itl(
llO li n...
s®®L"TCL u.W-1999u_i
uuua ®ice—ieiiii aaa.—i _...:—ate%a lava,
EAST ELEVATION
n 9 bra ..I I i
ate . 9n_
a
295
design
Heery International Inc.
820 16th Street Mall,
Suite 200,
Denver,CO 80202-3219
720.946.0276
project number
1121900
i A S P E N V A L L E Y
Ili l I i'I IIJ I I•H O S P I T A L
PHASE 3 AND 4
ADDITION/EXPANSION
IEL
0401 Castle Creek Road
Aspen,Co 81611
SOUTH ELEVATION
consultants/construction managers
sbeuo,lcenew•a,ho-o. DHMDaayn
3400 East Baydud Ave.4300 311 Main 51.SuM 102
Demer,0o 6o7o9 Carbondale,0089823
303.399.51541 f 303.333.9501 97D 963.65201 f 970963.8522
HCER ENineerku3 Gellun-Snow
5420 Ward Road.Suile 200 1920 Madel SL Site 201
7wada,CO 80002 Denver,CO 80202
303.@2.740011303,422.7900 303433.9500/13034335624
sapns Engineering
502 Mal,St,Sulle A3
Car dale,C080623
910.704.03111 t 910.704.0313
seal/signature
issued for date
PHASE 3/4
FINAL PUD AUGUST 10,2012
item date
A& a
SCALE101"=20'
WEST ELEVATION key plan
sheet title
SOUTH
AND WEST
ELEVATIONS
sheet number
A-202
drawn by checked by
anpnu Mvnwneons,
296
Exhibit 10
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
Exhibit 11
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
March, 2016 City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5050
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
_____________________________________________________, Aspen, CO
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
_____________________________________________, 20______.
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I, ____________________________________________________ (name, please print) being
or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with
the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
_______ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
_______ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof
Materials, which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26)
Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height.
Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the
_______ day of ______________________, 20____, to and including the date and
time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached
hereto:
_______ Mailing of notice. By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development
Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of
The Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice
was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of
property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of
property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they
appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy
of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
________ Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized
and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section
26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary,
including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was
presented to the public is attached hereto.
(Continued on next page)
401 Castle creek Road, Aspen Valley Hospital
Tuesday May 12th, 2020 20
Chris Bendon
27 April 20-24
381
382
PUBLIC NOTICE
Date:
Time:
Place:
Purpose:
383
384
385
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611p: (970) 920.5000f: (970) 920.5197www.aspenpitkin.comAspen Valley HospitalProject LocaƟ on: 401 Castle Creek RoadLand Use Reviews: Extension of Vested RightsDecision Making Body: Aspen City CouncilHearing Date: March 12, 2020, 5:00pmHearing LocaƟ on: City Hall, City Council Room; 130 S. Galena St; Aspen, CO 81611Project DescripƟ on: The applicant is seeking a 5-year extension of vested rights associated with land use approvals including, but not limited to: City Council ResoluƟ on 3, Series 2009; P&Z Res-oluƟ on 2, Series 2013; Ordinance 6, Series 2013; a Development Agreement recorded at Recep-Ɵ on No. 608884, and two AdministraƟ ve Approvals’ recorded at RecepƟ on Numbers’: 622520 & 633493. The project is currently vested unƟ l May 23rd, 2020.Legal DescripƟ on: Aspen Valley Hospital Subdivision Parcel C and Track F; Pitkin County, Colorado.Parcel ID: 2735-12-307-801Applicant: Aspen Valley Hospital, Elaine Gerson-General Counsel for AVH, 401 Castle Creek Road,Aspen, CO 81611. Represented by BendonAdams.More InformaƟ on: For further informaƟ on related to the project, contact Kevin Rayes at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797, kevin.rayes@cityofaspen.com386
300 South Spring StreetAspen CO 81611970.925.2855bendonadams.com387
Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius
Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web
site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to
ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic
system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral
estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County
does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners.
Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning
the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this
site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and
reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the
user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and
liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or
data obtained on this web site.
This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be
printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to
page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the
margins such that they no longer line up on the labels
sheet. Print actual size.
From Parcel: 273512307801 on 03/12/2020
Instructions:
Disclaimer:
http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com
Exhibit 8
388
KELEHER LINDA BUREAU TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
202 MEADOWOOD DR
HEATHER LANE LLC
HOUSTON, TX 77056-2004
5379 LYNBROOK DR
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
CASTLE RIDGE ASSOCIATES LTD
ST ANN, MO 63074
PO BOX 95
RINTOUL AMY V
ASPEN, CO 81611
161 GROVE CT
KRET LORI A & COLE JEFFREY M
ASPEN, CO 81611
262 GROVE CT
ANGUS CRAIG M & KAREN S
ASPEN, CO 81611
PO BOX 7965
ASPEN CHAPEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
77 MEADOWOOD DR
KREUTZER GARY REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
109 TWIN RIDGE DR
LEE BRUCE LANDON
ASPEN, CO 81612
141 GROVE CT
MEANS GRAEME DONALD & ELIZABETH C
ASPEN, CO 81611-3341
189 MEADOWOOD DR
TWIN RIDGE HOA
ASPEN, CO 81611
363 GROVE CT
PODHURST AARON S QPRT 50%
MIAMI, FL 33131
ONE S.E. THIRD AVE #2300
WALLA JOHN D & JEAN D
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 161
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
ASPEN, CO 81611
0401 CASTLE CREEK RD
PATTERSON PATRICIA O REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
499 MEADOWOOD DR
POLOVIN DAVID L
ASPEN, CO 816113140
363 GROVE ST
KIERNAN MARC
ASPEN, CO 81611
161 GROVE CT
KREUTZER DEBBIE REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
109 TWIN RIDGE DR
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
MACLEAN ARCHIBALD JR & ANNE
ASPEN, CO 81611
90 TWIN RIDGE DR
RYMAN KAREN L
ASPEN, CO 81611
343 GROVE CT
FRIAS RAYMOND C & MARILYN F
ASPEN, CO 81611
100 MEADOWOOD DR
HOOD JEFFREY M
ASPEN, CO 81611
121 GROVE CT
MEADOWOOD METROPOLITAN DIST
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 8774
MOREHEAD RONALD L & ERLINDA M
ASPEN, CO 81611
128 TWINRIDGE CT
TWIN RIDGE HOA
ASPEN, CO 81611
363 GROVE CT
JACKSON MEADOWS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
437 MEADOWOOD DR
HEGER FRANK & CARLA
ASPEN, CO 81611-3139
222 GROVE CT
PROCHASKA JUDITH ELLEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
108 TWIN RIDGE LN 389
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
TWIN RIDGE TOWNHOMES ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
121 GROVE CT
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
KELEHER JOHN GORRY TRUST
ASPEN, CO 816113336
202 MEADOWOOD DR
FORD JOHN
ASPEN, CO 81611
188 MEADOWOOD DR
LAHR DANIEL & RACHEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
323 GROVE CT
CROSS SUSAN K
ASPEN, CO 81611-3139
242 GROVE CT
GIBSONE ALEXANDER S
ASPEN, CO 81611
303 GROVE CT # 9
PITKIN COUNTY
ASPEN, CO 81611
530 E MAIN ST #301
LYONS MICHAEL J & JENNIFER C
ASPEN, CO 81611
74 TWIN RIDGE DR
MTN OAKS EMPLOYEE HSING
ASPEN, CO 81611
200 CASTLE CREEK RD
PODHURST DOROTHY E QPRT 50%
MIAMI, FL 33131
ONE S.E. THIRD AVE #2300
ASPEN CHAPEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
77 MEADOWOOD DR
WEISS CLIFFORD A & STACEY L
ASPEN, CO 81611
202 GROVE CT
PATTERSON PAUL T REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
499 MEADOWOOD DR
LOBO DA CUNHA MARINA G
ASPEN, CO 81611
121 GROVE CT
ONEIL DENNIS & SHARON
ASPEN, CO 81611-3134
101 GROVE CT
390