HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.council.regular.202008251
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Amended Packet 8/24/20
August 25, 2020
5:00 PM, City Council Chambers
130 S Galena Street, Aspen
I.CALL TO ORDER
II.ROLL CALL
III.SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES
IV.CITIZENS COMMENTS & PETITIONS
(Time for any citizen to address Council on issues NOT scheduled for a public hearing. Please
limit your comments to 3 minutes)
City of Aspen invites you to join this Webex meeting:
Meeting number (access code): 126 856 6823
Meeting password: 81611
Tuesday, August 25, 2020
4:30 pm | (UTC-06:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada) | 5 hrs
+1-720-650-7664,,1268566823## United States Toll (Denver)
V.SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
a) Councilmembers' and Mayor's Comments
b) Agenda Amendments
c) City Manager's Comments
d) Board Reports
VI.CONSENT CALENDAR
(These matters may be adopted together by a single motion)
VI.A.Resolution #073, Series of 2020 - US Bureau of Reclamation Water Smart Drought
Resiliency Grant
VI.B.Resolution #071, Series of 2020 - Cable Testing with PRY-Cam Technologies
VI.C.Resolution #074, Series of 2020 - Wheeler Opera House Masonry Scope
VI.D.Resolution #077, Series of 2020 - Stage Two Water Restriction
1
2
VI.E.Draft Minutes of August 11th, 2020
VII.NOTICE OF CALL-UP
VII.A.HPC approval for 110 Neale Avenue - Conceptual Major Development
VII.B.HPC approval for 500 W. Main Street- Conceptual Major Development Review and
Residential Design Standards Review, Resolution #16, Series of 2020
VIII.FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
IX.PUBLIC HEARINGS
IX.A.Ordinance #10, Series 2020 - Amend Chapters 25.28, Water Shortages of the City
of Aspen Municipal Code
X.ACTION ITEMS
X.A.Resolution #067, Series of 2020 - Silver City Ice Rink Temporary Use
XI.ADJOURNMENT
2
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM: Steve Hunter, PE, PH, Utilities Resource Manager
THROUGH:Tyler Christoff, PE, Director of Utilities
MEMO DATE:08/13/2020
MEETING DATE:08/25/2020
RE:Resolution #73 - U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Water Smart Drought
Resiliency Grant – Enhanced Hydrologic Measurement: Streamflow Gage
and Snow Telemetry Station Project
________________
REQUEST OF COUNCIL: The City of Aspen Water Utility applied for a Drought Resiliency grant
with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) on August 5,2020. Staff is requesting Council
support this grant application through approval of Resolution # 73, Series of 2020, which is a
requirement of this federal grant submittal.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: This grant application is a component of the City’s overall water
management and drought program. The grant initially was only requesting funds for a stream
gage on Castle Creek. At the July 13, 2020 Council work session Council members asked staff to
consider a SNOTEL site as part of the application.
On July 28, 2020 Council approved the City’s Drought Mitigation and Response Plan (DMRP).
The installation of a stream gage on Castle Creek and the addition of a SNOTEL site would help
improve the City’s procedures for making drought declaration decisions as part of the DMRP.
BACKGROUND: The proposed project includes the installation of a new United States
Geological Survey (USGS) streamflow gage on Castle Creek and the installation of a new Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) site within the Castle Creek
or Maroon Creek basins. Live streamflow, local snowpack data, and any modelled streamflow
forecasts will be used directly by City staff to monitor local hydrologic conditions, supporting
the City’s drought monitoring and response program. Data will be incorporated into existing
drought monitoring tools and this data can be integrated into the City’s long-range water
planning.
3
2
DISCUSSION:The City heavily relies upon available hydrologic data in the area, including
streamflow, snowpack, and climate data to inform drought declaration decisions. Because the
City does not have significant storage as part of its water system, speedy drought response is
paramount to mitigate damage and respond to water supply shortages.
Currently, the community does not have access to a USGSstreamflow gage data on, Castle Creek.
There are also no local snowpack measurement sites within basins providing Aspen’s primary
water supplies.
The proposed grant application and associated projects include: the installation of a new United
States Geological Survey (USGS) streamflow gage on Castle Creek above the City’s municipal
intake and the installation of a new Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) snow
telemetry (SNOTEL) site. The City has partnerships with both organizations and has been
coordinating with both to develop these new measurement sites.
Data collected at these new measurement sites will support the City’sactive drought monitoring
program and will be used to develop local drought monitoring tools and will ultimately be
integrated into existing water supply planning models. Enhanced data to support drought
monitoring and water supply planning will allow the City to more quickly and accurately predict
and declare droughts, prepare for and mitigate operations prior to drought, implement more
targeted drought responses based onthe unique conditionsof each drought, and more efficiently
operate its municipal water supplies.
FINACIAL IMPACTS: The City Water Utility department would need to provide matching
funds if the City is successful in being awarded the grant. These matching funds are currently
not appropriated within the budget and therefore would need to be considered when
appropriating the 2021 capital plan. Total project costs are shown in the table below.
Table 1.Total Project Costs of Federal and Non-Federal Funding Sources.
Funding Source Amount
Costs to be Reimbursed with the Requested Federal Funding $59,446.55
Costs to be Paid by the Applicant (COA)$59,446.55
Total Project Cost $118,893.10
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approval of Resolution #73 Series of 2020.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A – Resolution # 73, Series of 2020
Exhibit B – USBR Water Smart Drought Resiliency Grant Application
4
RESOLUTION # 73
(Series of 2020)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO, WHICH AUTHORIZES THE CITY OF ASPEN TO COMMIT TO
THE FINANCIAL AND LEGAL OBLIGATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH
RECEIPT OF A FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AWARD FROM THE FEDERAL
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION FOR THE ASPEN ENHANCED
HYDROLOGIC MEASUREMENT:STREAMFLOW GAGE AND SNOW
TELEMETRY PROJECT GRANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED ON AUGUST
5, 2020.
WHEREAS, a federal assistance request application for the Aspen
Enhanced Hydrologic Measurement: Streamflow Gage and Snow Telemetry
project that proposes a $118,893.10 Federal Grant with a City of Aspen Water
Utility match of $59,544.55, has been submitted to the City Council a true and
accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B”;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves and commits
the City of Aspen to the financial and legal obligations associated with the receipt
of a financial assistance award from the Federal government, if one is so given, a
copy of which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein, and does hereby
authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of
Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Aspen on the ____ day of _____, 2020.
Torre, Mayor
I, Nicole Henning, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the
foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City
Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held, August 25, 2020.
5
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
6
WaterSMART Drought Response Program: Drought Resiliency
Projects for FY 2021
Funding Opportunity BOR-DO-20-F002
Prepared By:
City of Aspen
Project Manager: Steve Hunter
Water Department
130 Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
steve.hunter@cityofaspen.com
970.429.1983
August 4, 2020
City of Aspen
Enhanced Hydrologic Measurement:
Streamflow Gage and Snow Telemetry
Station Project
7
City of Aspen PAGE ii
Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1
1.1 APPLICATION INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 1
1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1
2. TECHNICAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................. 2
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION ...................................................................................................... 2
2.2 TECHNICAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 3
2.2.1 USGS STREAMFLOW GAGE ............................................................................................ 4
2.2.2 NRCS SNOTEL SITE ..................................................................................................... 5
2.3 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ............................................................................................ 6
3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: EVALUATION CRITERIA ............................................................... 7
3.1 EVALUATION CRITERION A ............................................................................................. 7
3.2 EVALUATION CRITERION B ........................................................................................... 10
3.3 EVALUATION CRITERION C ........................................................................................... 12
3.4 EVALUATION CRITERION D ........................................................................................... 13
3.5 EVALUATION CRITERION E ........................................................................................... 15
3.6 EVALUATION CRITERION F ........................................................................................... 15
4. PROJECT BUDGET ........................................................................................................... 18
4.1 FUNDING PLAN AND LETTERS OF COMMITMENT ............................................................... 18
4.2 BUDGET PROPOSAL .................................................................................................... 19
4.3 BUDGET NARRATIVE ................................................................................................... 20
4.3.1 SALARIES AND WAGES ................................................................................................. 20
4.3.2 FRINGE BENEFITS ........................................................................................................ 20
4.3.3 TRAVEL..................................................................................................................... 20
4.3.4 EQUIPMENT .............................................................................................................. 20
4.3.5 MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES ............................................................................................ 20
4.3.6 CONTRACTUAL ........................................................................................................... 20
4.3.7 THIRD-PARTY IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS ........................................................................... 21
4.3.8 ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE COSTS ................................................... 21
4.3.9 OTHER EXPENSES........................................................................................................ 21
4.3.10 INDIRECT COSTS ......................................................................................................... 21
5. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE ....................................... 21
6. REQUIRED PERMITS OR APPROVALS .............................................................................. 23
7. OFFICIAL RESOLUTION ................................................................................................... 23
8. LETTERS OF SUPPORT ..................................................................................................... 24
8
City of Aspen PAGE iii
Figures
Figure 1: City of Aspen General Location Map .......................................................................................... 2
Tables
Table 1: Potential Future Drought Impacts. ........................................................................................... 12
Table 2: Total Project Cost: Summary of Federal and Non-Federal Funding Sources ............................... 18
Table 3: Proposed Project Budget .......................................................................................................... 19
9
City of Aspen PAGE 1
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 APPLICATION INFORMATION
Submittal Date A ugust 5, 2020
Applicant City of Aspen, Colorado
Steve Hunter, Utilities Resource Manager
Water Department
130 Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
970-429-1983
Funding Group I
Grant Funding Requested $59,446.55
Total Project Budget $118,893.10
Project Duration O ctober 2020 through December 2022 (27
months)
Estimated Project Completion Date December 31, 2022
Project Location Project will be located in the Roaring Fork
river basin near Aspen, Colorado. Specific
locations for new measurement
instrumentation will be determined through
the project implementation. Project location
is not located on a Federal facility.
1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY
The City of Aspen (Aspen or City) is located in Pitkin County, Colorado within the Colorado River Basin.
Aspen has recently completed its Municipal Drought Mitigation and Response Plan (DMRP) and has been
operating a drought response program for over a decade through its Water Shortage code. Beginning with
the drought of 2002, Aspen has declared drought and enforced water use restrictions a total of four times.
At the time of this grant submittal, Aspen is currently operating under a Stage 1 drought declaration. The
City heavily relies upon available hydrologic data in the area, including streamflow, snowpack, and climate
data to inform drought declaration decisions. Because the City does not have significant storage as part
of its water system, speedy drought response is paramount to mitigate damage and respond to water
supply shortages. Currently, the City does not have an active streamflow gage on its primary potable water
supply source, Castle Creek. There are also no local snowpack measurement sites within basins providing
Aspen’s primary water supplies. The project that is subject to this application is the installation of a new
United States Geological Survey (USGS) streamflow gage on Castle Creek above the City’s municipal intake
and the installation of a new Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) snow telemetry (SNOTEL)
site. The City has partnerships with both organizations and has been coordinating with both to develop
these new measurement sites. Data collected at these new measurement sites will support the City’s
10
City of Aspen PAGE 2
active drought monitoring program and will be used to develop local drought monitoring tools and will
ultimately be integrated into existing water supply planning models. Enhanced data to support drought
monitoring and water supply planning will allow the City to more quickly and accurately predict and
declare droughts, prepare for and mitigate operations prior to drought, implement more targeted drought
responses based on each drought’s unique conditions, and more efficiently operate its municipal supplies.
2. TECHNICAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The City of Aspen, Colorado is located at 39.1911 degrees N, 106.8175 degrees W in Pitkin County. Aspen
is situated in the upper reaches of the Roaring Fork Valley near the confluences of the main-stem of the
Roaring Fork River with Hunter Creek, Castle Creek, and Maroon Creek at an elevation of approximately
7,900 feet. The Roaring Fork River is a tributary to the Upper Colorado River, as shown in Figure 1 below.
Aspen’s service area is located along Colorado State Highway 82 approximately 20 miles west of
Independence Pass, as shown in Figure 1 below. The incorporated area (within the municipal boundary)
consists of approximately 3.83 square miles. However, at this time, the total service territory is
approximately 8.5 square miles, and includes unincorporated areas served by Aspen.
Figure 1: City of Aspen General Location Map
*Map from U.S. Department of Interior – Bureau of Reclamation
The proposed project, which includes the installation of a new streamflow gage and the installation of a
new SNOTEL site, is located within the Castle Creek and Maroon Creek basins and will be located near the
City’s service area. Specific locations for the measurement instrumentation will be determined through
the project implementation based on field investigations, land ownership, and evaluation of site
Aspen
11
City of Aspen PAGE 3
conditions. Preliminary investigations for both the USGS streamflow gage and the NRCS SNOTEL site have
been completed, and potential locations that have been identified are included as Attachment A.
2.2 TECHNICAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Aspen is a home-rule municipality that owns and operates its water utilities, providing treated (potable)
water to all customers in the service area and raw water for hydroelectric production as well as for
irrigation and snowmaking purposes to a small subset of customers. The City is an active leader in water
conservation and efficiency in the State of Colorado and is committed to sustainable water use practices
and programs both locally and regionally. Aspen Water Utility provides service to approximately 4,000
accounts located inside and outside the Aspen Municipal boundary.
Aspen has recently completed its municipal Drought Mitigation and Response Plan (DMRP), which was
developed through a collaborative process within Aspen’s staff to define a drought monitoring program,
evaluate drought local impacts, and define the City’s staged drought response program. The City’s
Municipal Code defines the process for drought declaration under its Water Shortage section, referring to
the DMRP for specific response strategies. At the time of this application, Aspen is operating under a Stage
1 drought declaration. The City currently does not have significant storage, which makes drought
mitigation and declaration less straight-forward and places heavy dependence on available hydrologic and
climate data, which does not always reflect local supply conditions. For Aspen, its surface water supply is
heavily reliant upon snowpack and runoff conditions, becoming particularly vulnerable in the late summer
after the main snowmelt runoff period and landscape irrigation demands are still high.
To interpret local conditions, Aspen staff rely upon several hydrologic and climatic indices including
snowpack, precipitation, temperature, wind, evaporation, streamflow, soil moisture, and weather
forecasts to support professional judgment in making recommendations for declaring water shortages
and moving through drought stages. The combination of conditions makes each year unique and requires
ongoing monitoring. The time of year corresponding with each indicator is also important to consider, e.g.
snowpack is used as a primary indicator during winter and early spring months while streamflow is used
as a primary indicator during runoff and summer months.
Because Aspen’s supplies are driven by snowpack conditions and subsequent runoff patterns, it is difficult
to accurately predict conditions far in advance. One large snow event can shift snowpack levels from far
below average to above average. Similarly, early peak runoff and abnormally high temperatures can result
in reduced late-summer streamflow levels even if end-of-season snowpack data had indicated above-
average levels. As such, monitoring is an ongoing process.
The City’s primary potable water supply comes from a senior surface water right on Castle Creek. There is
currently not an active streamflow gage located on Castle Creek, which makes monitoring water supply
availability challenging. The City relies heavily on streamflow supply indicators to determine water
shortage and drought conditions. Without an active streamflow gage, consistently monitoring live
streamflow conditions is not possible. Additionally, Castle Creek and the City’s secondary potable supply,
Maroon Creek, are both snowmelt dominated streams. The closest SNOTEL site is located on
Independence Pass, which does not necessarily represent local snow conditions in the Castle and Maroon
Creek watersheds above Aspen. Snowpack conditions over the winter and spring months can provide a
strong indication for what supply conditions may be during the runoff and summer seasons if the site is
located in a representative area.
12
City of Aspen PAGE 4
This project includes the installation of a new USGS streamflow gage on Castle Creek and the installation
of a new NRCS SNOTEL site within the Castle Creek or Maroon Creek watersheds. The installation and
maintenance of a Castle Creek gage will help improve the City’s ability to monitor streamflow and make
drought declaration and response decisions. The installation and maintenance of a more locally positioned
SNOTEL site will help to improve the City’s ability to monitor snowpack conditions and predict runoff. Data
will be collected at each of these sites throughout the year and will be made publicly available.
Live streamflow, local snowpack data, and any modelled streamflow forecasts will be used directly by
Aspen to monitor for local hydrologic conditions, supporting the City’s drought monitoring and response
program. Data will be incorporated into existing drought monitoring tools and, once at least five years of
data has been collected, this data can be integrated into the City’s long-range planning tools.
2.2.1 USGS STREAMFLOW GAGE
The USGS Groundwater and Streamflow Information Program supports the collection and delivery of both
streamflow and water-level information for thousands of sites. The data represent near real-time
measurements and are served online to meet many diverse needs. The streamflow gages are primarily
operated and maintained by the USGS, but most are funded in partnership with Federal, State, local, and
Tribal agencies or organizations. This unique cooperation results in nationally consistent and impartial
data that also aids local decision making.
Aspen has begun the process of developing an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the USGS to
install and operate a new streamflow gage on Castle Creek above the City’s municipal diversion. The USGS
process will being with a consultation with the City to identify specific needs and benefits for a new
streamflow gage. In 2018, Aspen and the USGS began some preliminary investigations to identify potential
locations for a new streamflow gage in this area, which will serve as a starting point for this consultation.
This will likely be followed by a site reconnaissance trip to determine the best possible gaging locations
and pros and cons of each. Once a preferred location is determined, the USGS will work with landowners
to obtain permissions and regulatory permits, as applicable.
The basic streamflow gage installation includes everything required to collect river level data (stage) and
transmit those data in real-time. The typical streamflow gage includes an instrumentation shelter, data
collection platform, stage sensor, antenna, solar panel, voltage regulator, batteries, reference gages,
crest-stage gage, and benchmark survey points. Additional equipment not covered in the basic installation
are methods for measuring non-wadeable flows, e.g. bank-type cableways, or significant channel
modifications. While it is Aspen’s hope that a basic streamflow gage installation is possible, for purposes
of this grant application, it is assumed that a more complicated setup may be required.
Operation and maintenance (O&M) of the streamflow gage includes routine site visits, usually 8 to 10
each year. During these visits, the USGS calibrates the on-site equipment and takes manual discharge
measurements. Basic maintenance is often performed during these routine visits. The USGS will also make
non-routine site visits as necessary to make unscheduled repairs, run levels to maintain gage datum,
upgrade equipment, and perform general maintenance. All equipment is purchased and owned by the
USGS, with an annual fee to be paid by Aspen to contribute to annual O&M costs. O&M also includes all
computations necessary to compute real-time streamflow, manage and maintain stage and streamflow
data indefinitely, provide access to real-time and historic data for stakeholders and the public, QA/QC all
data pertaining to the site, provide maintenance and upgrades to computer servers, and the final
publication of data.
The new Castle Creek streamflow gage will collect detailed streamflow data year-round and this data will
be made publicly available through the USGS website. The data will be collected at about hourly intervals
13
City of Aspen PAGE 5
and will be transmitted to the USGS for review. Data will be published through the USGS as part of the
National Streamflow Network (NSN), which consists of all streamflow gages that continuously monitor
streamflow year-round and from which daily mean streamflows are computed and made available online.
The data collected at NSN streamflow gages serve several functions (including flood warning, water
allocation, and recreation) and can be used by anyone regardless of whether or not they help fund the
network. The use of consistent methods enables data from the many gages to be combined, expanding
the use and value of the data from every gage.
Aspen will utilize measured streamflow data on Castle Creek to manage its municipal diversions on Castle
Creek while supporting the maintenance of Colorado Water Conservation Board’s (CWCB) decreed
instream flows. The streamflow will be continuously monitored during normal operations and will serve
to identify changes in streamflow that may indicate declining supply availability. During drought or other
water shortage conditions, streamflow will be tightly monitored to track drought response effectiveness
and to inform adjustments to staged drought levels. Streamflow will be tracked using internal drought
monitoring tools and will ultimately be incorporated in longer-term water supply modelling.
2.2.2 NRCS SNOTEL SITE
The NRCS installs, operates, and maintains an extensive, automated data collection network called
SNOTEL, which is short for snow telemetry. This network is designed to collect snowpack and related
climatic data in the western United States and up into Alaska. This program operates under technical
guidance from the NRCS National Water and Climate Center (NWCC).
Aspen has begun the process of developing an IGA with the NRCS to install a new SNOTEL station within
the Castle Creek or Maroon Creek watershed near Aspen. The NRCS has completed preliminary site
evaluations within the desired watersheds, considering elevation, road access, representative hydrologic
conditions, and existing sites located within nearby watersheds. Upon completion of the IGA, the NRCS
and Aspen will work together to determine the most desirable site location and will conduct an in-situ
manual snowpack read over one or two winters, depending on conditions measured. Once the site is
confirmed, NRCS will acquire necessary equipment, construct the new SNOTEL station, and install the
instrumentation at the selected site.
Data collected through SNOTEL sites on snowpack provide critical information to decision-makers and
water managers, providing indications for seasonal hydrologic conditions and forecasts. These sites are
generally located in remote, high-elevation mountain watersheds and are designed to operate
unattended and without maintenance for a year or more. A typical SNOTEL remote site consists of
measuring devices and sensors, an equipment shelter for the radio telemetry equipment, and an antenna
that also supports the solar panels used to keep batteries charged.
A standard sensor configuration includes a snow pillow, a storage precipitation gage, and a temperature
sensor. The snow pillow measures how much water is in the snowpack by weighing the snow with a
pressure transducer. Devices in the shelter convert the weight of the snow into the snow's water
equivalent which represents the actual amount of water in a given volume of snow. SNOTEL stations also
collect data on snow depth, all-season precipitation accumulation, and air temperature. The configuration
at each site is tailored to the physical conditions, the climate, and the specific requirements of the data
users.
While SNOTEL stations are designed to operate unattended and without maintenance for a year or more,
annual maintenance provides an opportunity to ensure general station integrity. The NRCS will conduct
annual maintenance checks at the site to perform necessary preventive maintenance and replace
components on a schedule that meets specified sensor calibration or replacement intervals. The annual
14
City of Aspen PAGE 6
site visit/inspection also serves for removing vegetative growth, repairing site facilities, and ensuring
proper site drainage. Non-routine site visits will be made as necessary to make unscheduled repairs,
upgrade equipment, and perform general maintenance. All equipment is purchased and owned by the
NRCS at no cost to Aspen beyond the initial installation. O&M also includes all computations necessary to
compute snow-water equivalent, manage and maintain collected data, provide access to real-time and
historic data for stakeholders and the public, QA/QC all data pertaining to the site, provide maintenance
and upgrades to computer servers, and the final publication of data.
Most measurements at automated stations are taken about once an hour and are generally reported as
daily values. SNOTEL stations transmit data to master stations in meteor burst format. When data are
received by a master station, they are instantly available for the Water and Climate Information System
(WCIS) storage application online. An initial validation screening procedure is automatically applied to
data received from each SNOTEL station using the sensor profiles assigned to each station. Data editors
review each prior week’s data on a weekly basis and make any needed editing changes. Over time, editing
decisions made previously can be re-evaluated for correctness. Depending on the correlation of the
measured data at this site, the data collected at this site may be integrated into water supply forecasts
produced by the NRCS NWCC in partnership with the National Weather Service.
Aspen will utilize measured snowpack data in the local basin to monitor local snowpack and climate
conditions during winter months as an early indicator of water supply conditions for the coming summer.
Over time, the measured snowpack and the observed water supply will be evaluated for trends between
snowpack levels over the season and timing and volume of runoff. Snowpack will be tracked using internal
drought monitoring tools and will ultimately be incorporated in longer-term water supply modelling.
2.3 PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Generally, the two methods for confirming the project performance and reliability are as follows:
1. Evaluation of the reliability of the data collection, transmittal, and quality of data. This is managed
through standard processes developed and implemented through the USGS and NRCS.
2. Evaluation of the applied data for drought monitoring and how well data represents water supply
availability in the local watershed. This will be managed through the City of Aspen over time as
enough data from both stations are collected, applied, and evaluated through drought monitoring
and water supply modelling.
Performance Measure #1
For the new streamflow gage, continuously measured water levels are used to compute hourly (or more
frequent) time series of streamflows from gage-specific rating curves that were developed using onsite
streamflow measurements made by USGS hydrographers. The data are quality assured and made
available online. The evaluation of the reliability of the data collection, transmittal, and quality of data are
the responsibility of the USGS and all internal processes and procedures will be followed.
For the new SNOTEL site, data goes through an initial automatic validation screening on daily data. Manual
reviews are made weekly by data editors and any data corrections are made. Longer-term, data
modifications may be made on prior data based on trends and observations in the station’s data. At the
end of each water year, a full data audit on all daily data for the entire year is performed. This annual
review is completed by February 1 of the following year. The evaluation of the reliability of the data
collection, transmittal, and quality of data are the responsibility of the NRCS and all internal processes
and procedures will be followed.
15
City of Aspen PAGE 7
Performance Measure #2
Once installed and calibrated, data will be collected at each of the new stations and will be transmitted
back to the corresponding network for review, validation, and storage. Once the new stations are
established, Aspen will take the available data from the streamflow gage to monitor live streamflow year-
round, using this data to inform standard operations and to act as a real-time drought indicator should
flows drop below a certain threshold during different times of the year. Snowpack data will be utilized by
the City during winter months to predict runoff timing and volume. Lower than average snowpack will
indicate lower than normal runoff and supply availability. In these conditions, Aspen will strongly consider
early irrigation season drought declaration and will increase monitoring and public messaging activities.
Aspen will develop and establish an internal monitoring and data management plan for each of the
datasets created through the new stations. These sites will be operated long-term and data will be used
to inform drought monitoring program operation and modification. Data reliability will be reviewed
through the modelling efforts and data trends will be used to update or adjust internal water supply
modelling to best represent supply conditions and drought forecasts.
3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: EVALUATION CRITERIA
3.1 EVALUATION CRITERION A
Project Benefits (40 Points)
How will the project build long-term resilience to drought? How many years will the project continue
to provide benefits?
Because Aspen does not have significant water storage, water shortage declaration is a near real-time
decision made by analyzing and interpreting monitoring data, cross checking with other regional and local
water resources experts, and applying historical experience coupled with professional judgment.
Installation of a new USGS streamflow gage along the City’s primary treated water supply, Castle Creek,
will support the City’s long-term resistance to drought by better informing the City of streamflow
conditions and availability of supply. Trends in streamflow will provide the City with critical information
to support drought declaration and inform the City of potential drought severity. Without a gage on this
stretch of river, the City is reliant on neighboring rivers and visual cues in the watershed to project supply
availability. Using the real-time streamflow measurement to inform operations will allow the City to
modify operations early and mitigate the severity of drought impacts.
Because the City’s surface supplies are driven by snow runoff, snowpack levels during winter months
provide a strong indication of what levels of surface supply to expect during the summer months. The City
currently relies upon snowpack readings at SNOTEL sites that do not necessarily represent local watershed
conditions. Because one snow event can significantly impact runoff availability and timing, measuring
snowpack in the local watershed provides a more representative indication of local supply availability. As
with the new streamflow gage, the addition of a new local SNOTEL site supports a more robust, locally
representative monitoring program for the City. Adding two new local measurement stations that support
drought monitoring year-round builds the City’s long-term resilience to drought through more locally
informed monitoring that influences drought responses specific to each drought’s unique characteristics.
The City has a hydrologic model that is no longer actively used but had been used historically to support
drought declaration decisions. This model relied on historical streamflow conditions from a discontinued
16
City of Aspen PAGE 8
gage on Castle Creek. The basic structure of this model is sound, however, modifications to utilize
measured streamflow data available through the new Castle Creek gage would provide a more
representative and real-time representation of hydrologic conditions. Snowpack is currently not part of
the City’s internal modelling because available SNOTEL sites are not directly tied hydrologically to Castle
Creek or Maroon Creek basins. The addition of a locally positioned SNOTEL site will provide more relevant
data for the City to track internally or include in a drought monitoring tool or model.
The duration of the project benefits will continue in perpetuity. The City, with support from City Council,
is committed to supporting both the USGS and the NRCS to maintain and continue to operate the new
monitoring sites well into the future. Aspen has agreed to provide annual funding to the USGS to maintain
and operate the new streamflow gage. NRCS has committed that all O&M costs and labor will be provided
by NRCS. The City will continue to update or build more robust hydrologic models and internal drought
monitoring tools using the new streamflow and snowpack data. This information will also be relied upon
for longer-term water supply planning and drought mitigation programs after 3 to 5 years of data is
collected and available.
Will the project make additional water supplies available? Please explain where the water that will
be conserved is currently going (e.g., back to the stream, spilled at the end of the ditch, seeping into
the ground)?
The proposed project will include the installation of two new measurement devices, which will provide
near real-time streamflow measurements and local snowpack and hydrologic data. This will be used for
the City’s near-term drought monitoring efforts and for its long-term water supply and management
planning. Additional water supplies will not be made available directly through the installation of these
monitoring sites, however, the data collected and used through these sites will support water
management and drought response, which may ultimately result in more surface water supplies becoming
available for Aspen’s municipal supply, to support maintenance of decreed instream flows, and
throughout the watershed.
Will the project improve the management of water supplies? For example, will the project increase
efficiency, increase operational flexibility, or facilitate water marketing (e.g., improve the ability to
deliver water during drought or access other sources of supply)?
• If so, how will the project increase efficiency or operational flexibility?
• What is the estimated quantity of water that will be better managed as a result of this
project? How was this estimate calculated? Provide this quantity in acre-feet per year as the
average annual benefit over ten years (e.g., if the project captures flood flows in wet years,
provide the average benefit over ten years including dry years).
• How will the project increase efficiency or operational flexibility?
• What percentage of the total water supply does the water better managed represent? How
was this estimate calculated?
• Provide a brief qualitative description of the degree/significance of anticipated water
management benefits.
• Will the project make new information available to water managers? If so, what is that
information and how will it improve water management?
Yes, the addition of a new streamflow gage and a SNOTEL site will improve the management of water
supplies. The streamflow data will be used to manage diversions for potable water production and to
support the maintenance of CWCB instream flows. Castle Creek is the City’s primary potable water supply,
supplemented with its Maroon Creek diversions only when Castle Creek cannot meet all potable demands.
17
City of Aspen PAGE 9
Because of this, the percentage of the total water supply that the water better managed represents up to
100% of the City’s potable supply, an average of about 3,400 acre-feet per year1.
Timing of drought stage declaration is very important for Aspen to allow ample time for staff to implement
and engage the public in the staged response program. If a water shortage declaration does not occur
with enough lead time for implementation and response effects to be achieved, decreed instream flows
may be depleted and demands may exceed supplies, resulting in emergency situations. Public response
lead time is a crucial consideration, as many of Aspen’s customers are not full-time residents and may not
initially be engaged enough to quickly react to an early water shortage declaration. This also highlights
the importance of fostering an ongoing and engaged efficiency culture. Conversely, declaring a water
shortage or advancing a drought stage prematurely can result in unnecessary restrictions, impacting
community confidence as well as City revenue.
Additional streamflow data combined with local snowpack data will provide the City with more reliable
information to more effectively manage anticipated water shortage conditions. With more time to
prepare for a water shortage utilizing increased local data, the City will be better positioned to mitigate
water shortage conditions and improve its ability to deliver water during drought.
Outside of the City, other local and regional agencies, including municipalities, environmental groups, and
regional partnerships, will benefit from additional streamflow and snowpack data as well. These also add
stations for the USGS and NRCS, which enhance each agency’s data portfolio and streamflow projection
models.
Will the project have benefits to fish, wildlife, or the environment? If so, please describe those
benefits.
Aspen is committed to protecting decreed instream flows and has adopted a policy to maintain
streamflow in the creeks downstream of its diversion structures at flow rates that are at or above the
CWCB’s decreed instream flow rights for the protection of the fishery and the associated aquatic habitats
in those streams. At times, Aspen limits its river diversions to prioritize protection of the environmental
flows. As defined in Aspen’s DMRP, the City’s top priority is to preserve the health and safety of the
community, followed by the City’s commitment to protect the natural environment through the
preservation of decreed instream flows. Early drought response and effective response efforts minimize
drought impacts to Aspen’s customers and allow the City to continue to prioritize instream flow
protection. Aspen has an intergovernmental agreement with the CWCB to protect the natural
environment of Castle Creek by operating the City’s water rights on Castle Creek in a manner that will
allow the decreed minimum streamflow of 12 cubic feet per second to be maintained under all but the
most severe drought conditions, or emergencies. CWCB instream flows are administered by the CWCB
and flow rates that will sufficiently benefit the natural environment in a given stream reach are
determined by conducting hydrological analyses. The CWCB’s instream flow water rights protect diverse
environments in Colorado. The instream flow program can address important emerging issues such as
water requirements for declining, sensitive, and threatened and endangered species, protection of
macroinvertebrate populations and rare riparian vegetation assemblages, or restoration of the natural
environment.
1 Baseline treated water demand defined in the City of Aspen Municipal Water Efficiency Plan dated October 21, 2015. This value
represents treated water production, which includes all potable demands plus water loss.
18
City of Aspen PAGE 10
To what extent are the methods tested/proven? To what degree will the project improve the ability to
predict the onset of drought earlier and/or with more certainty? To what degree will the project
improve the ability to anticipate the severity and magnitude of drought? To what degree will the
project improve the likelihood/timing of detecting mitigation action triggers?
The methods for measurement under both the USGS streamflow gage and the NRCS SNOTEL site are
proven and have been supporting the collection of streamflow and snowpack data throughout the United
States. The USGS Groundwater and Streamflow Information Program supports more than 8,500 sites and
water-level information alone for more than 1,700 additional sites. Near real-time data are served online
to support many diverse needs. The SNOTEL network is composed of over 800 automated data collection
sites located in remote, high-elevation mountain watersheds in the western U.S. The data collected at
SNOTEL sites are transmitted to a central database and made publicly available.
Data received and analyzed by Aspen through these new stations will provide earlier indications of
drought conditions, improving the City’s ability to predict the onset of a drought earlier than with currently
available data and with more certainty. Data collected at the streamflow gage and SNOTEL site will also
improve the City’s ability to predict and potentially mitigate the severity and magnitude of an impending
drought. This is because these stations will be more locally representative and provide more direct
hydrologic information in the Castle and Maroon Creek basins. The City’s drought response strategy is
based on five stages representing increasingly severe drought conditions. With more localized data, the
City’s movement through these stages will be more aligned with actual conditions, customizing the City’s
responses to directly reflect each drought’s unique characteristics.
3.2 EVALUATION CRITERION B
Drought Planning and Preparedness (15 Points)
Municipal Drought Mitigation and Response Plan
Explain how the applicable plan addresses drought. Proposals that reference plans clearly intended
to prepare for and address drought will receive more points under this criterion.
The City of Aspen adopted its municipal Drought Mitigation and Response Plan (DMRP) on July 28, 2020
(Attachment B). The plan generally followed guidance developed by the Colorado Water Conservation
Board (CWCB) for DMRP development. This DMRP focuses on managing the supplies that are available
under the City’s current surface water system operations as most of the the City’s supplies are met
through its surface water rights. The DMRP provides a framework for Aspen to use water sustainably,
particularly during drought and other conditions that create a water shortage. Water shortage occurs
when water demands exceed available water supplies and is often driven by a combination of snowpack
and precipitation conditions, streamflow, temperature, and water use. The plan identifies key drought
mitigation activities, formalizes internal drought monitoring resources and processes, and defines the
City’s staged drought response program. This is supported through Section 25.28 of the City’s Municipal
Code. Implementation of the DMRP:
• Supports the wise use of water under all conditions;
• Helps preserve essential public services; and
• Minimizes the adverse effects of a water supply emergency on public health and safety,
environmental resources, economic activity, and individual lifestyles.
19
City of Aspen PAGE 11
The DMRP works in concert with the City of Aspen Water Efficiency Plan (WEP) and programs
implemented through the WEP. These plans and programs encourage the efficient use of water at all
times by establishing “normal” condition guidelines that are in place unless restrictions are imposed
through action by City Council. Implementation of the WEP represents a significant component of the
City’s drought mitigation efforts.
Explain whether the drought plan was developed with input from multiple stakeholders. Was the
drought plan developed through a collaborative process?
Aspen created a Drought Response Committee (DRC), which includes staff members across different
departments throughout the City. This includes Utilities, Parks, Legal, Climate Action, and
Communications. These departments are involved in monitoring drought conditions, communicating with
elected officials and the public both before and during drought, evaluating the effectiveness of drought
response, enforcing drought restrictions, and developing recommendations for declaring a water shortage
related to drought and associated responses. The DRC was integral in the development of the City’s DMRP
and provided a recommendation to City Council that the plan be adopted.
Does the drought plan include consideration of climate change impacts to water resources or
drought?
Impacts to the City during future droughts may be similar to those experienced in past droughts,
depending upon how climate change impacts local conditions. Future droughts may be more frequent,
intense, and/or prolonged relative to historical droughts due to climate change. Climate change impacts
to water resources and future demands are integrated into the City’s long-term supply planning, including
drought mitigation efforts. While the City’s long-range planning specifically addresses climate change
impacts to water resources, the DMRP is designed to address drought responses for current and near-
term conditions. The intent is that the DMRP will be revisited and updated every 7 to 10 years, similar to
the municipal Water Efficiency Plan. This allows Aspen to adjust drought response stages and programs
as conditions change in order to allow the City to respond appropriately to a drought under current
hydrologic conditions. Climate change from internal long-range planning and impacts defined under the
City’s Climate Action Plan were considered in the development of Aspen’s drought mitigation programs.
Describe how your proposed drought resiliency project is supported by an existing drought plan.
Does the drought plan identify the proposed project as a potential mitigation or response action?
Does the proposed project implement a goal or need identified in the drought plan? Describe how
the proposed project is prioritized in the referenced drought plan?
The City’s water supply depends upon diversions from Castle and Maroon Creeks and therefore data-
informed monitoring of these watershed conditions is of critical importance. Monitoring and data
assessment are most intensive starting in February when snowpack levels start to show trends that can
be compared to historical averages, continuing through August when Castle Creek and Maroon Creek
flows are declining, and outdoor uses are still high. Currently, monitoring of drought indicators is
complicated by the fact that there is not an active streamflow gage located on Castle Creek and nearby
SNOTEL site data do not indicate local watershed conditions for Aspen’s supplies.
Because Aspen’s supplies are driven by snowpack conditions and subsequent runoff patterns, it is difficult
to a ccurately predict conditions far in advance. One large snow event can shift snowpack levels from
below average to above average. Similarly, early peak runoff and abnormally high temperatures can result
in reduced late-summer streamflow levels even if end-of-season snowpack data had indicated above-
average levels. As such, monitoring is a continuous process. A water shortage declaration is a near real-
20
City of Aspen PAGE 12
time decision made by analysing and interpreting monitoring data, cross-checking with other regional and
local water resources experts, and applying historical experience coupled with professional judgment.
The installation and maintenance of a Castle Creek streamflow gage will help improve the City’s ability to
monitor and make drought declaration decisions in a timely manner. Additionally, the installation and
maintenance of a new SNOTEL site located within Aspen’s local watershed will provide critical snowpack
information that will help Aspen identify drought conditions early. The need for a streamflow gage on
Castle Creek above the City’s municipal diversion location as well as a locally positioned SNOTEL site is
specifically identified in Section 4.1 and Section 5.2 of the City’s DMRP. Enhancing the City’s monitoring
program through more reliable and relevant data is a high priority to support the DMRP.
3.3 EVALUATION CRITERION C
Severity of Actual or Potential Drought Impacts to be Addressed by the Project (15 Points)
Describe the severity of the impacts that will be addressed by the project:
Impacts to the City during future droughts may be similar to those experienced in past droughts
depending how climate change impacts local conditions. Future droughts may be more frequent, intense,
and/or prolonged relative to historical droughts. The level of severity for the anticipated impacts varies
from minor to significant and is influenced by the magnitude and duration of the drought. One operating
principle identified through the DMRP is to minimize the severity of potential impacts through planning
and mitigation. Table 1 below shows potential future drought impacts and the anticipated level of severity
based on historical impacts and the anticipated effects of mitigation and planning.
Table 1: Potential Future Drought Impacts.
Potential Future Impact Potential Severity
Increased costs and staff time to implement drought plan Minor
Reduced firefighting capability Minor
Changes in water use behavior to conserve water Moderate
Costs to increase water use efficiency Moderate
Impacts to fish and wildlife habitat Moderate
Loss of revenue from reduction in water sales Moderate
Loss to recreation and tourist industry Moderate
Restrictions/limitations on landscaping companies Moderate
Disruption of water supplies Moderate to Significant
Domestic landscaping stressed or lost Significant
Increased risk of frequency and severity of wildfires/flood hazards Significant
Loss of hydroelectric power generation Significant
Public landscaping stressed or lost Significant
Visual and landscape quality Significant
21
City of Aspen PAGE 13
At the time of this application, Aspen has declared Stage 1 drought conditions and are actively promoting
drought response programs to support this declaration and prepare the public for increased restrictions
should hydrologic conditions continue to diminish through the coming months. The last drought
declaration in Aspen was from summer of 2018 through spring of 2019, during which time the City
declared Stage 2 conditions for the first time since enacting water shortage responses through the City’s
Municipal Code. At that time, outdoor use was restricted, and surcharges were applied to the higher billing
tiers to offset impacts to revenue.
Throughout Colorado, water supply availability is expected to decrease as a result of a hotter and drier
climate future. This change in climate is also expected to increase outdoor water demands to maintain
the current landscape aesthetic. The City is actively developing an Integrated Resources Plan to evaluate
future demands and potential supply availability under future climate modeling scenarios. Prior modeling
efforts that considered the effects of climate change on supply availability showed that under certain
climate conditions, the City will be unable to meet demands under normal conditions due to reduced
supply availability from climate change. Aspen is more vulnerable to reductions in live streamflow because
the City does not have significant storage. Under future droughts, the supplies will be further reduced,
and drought impacts shown above will likely increase in severity. A 2016 Water Supply Availability Study 2
modelled Aspen’s supplies under historical hydrology and five climate scenarios against present-day and
projected demands. For this modelling effort, climate change impacts were applied only to supply
availability, not to demand projections. The table below shows modelled supply deficits for each of
Aspen’s demand scenarios based on the modelled supply conditions and operational assumptions.
Assuming the modelled supply availability represents an average year under various climate change
scenarios, future droughts under the projected climate conditions will result in higher supply deficits that
will likely impact the City’s municipal uses.
3.4 EVALUATION CRITERION D
Project Implementation (10 Points)
Describe the implementation plan of the proposed project. Please include an estimated project
schedule that shows the stages and duration of the proposed work, including major tasks, milestones,
2 City of Aspen Water Supply Availability Study 2016 Update. Prepared for City of Aspen. Prepared by Wilson Water Group. June
2016.
22
City of Aspen PAGE 14
and dates. Milestones may include, but are not limited to, the following: design, environmental and
cultural resources compliance, permitting, construction/installation.
USGS STREAMFLOW GAGE
Aspen will work with USGS to execute an
intergovernmental agreement (IGA) for the cost
share of the streamflow gage. The USGS will then
consult with Aspen to discuss needs and goals for
selecting a location for the gage. This will be followed
by a site reconnaissance trip to determine the best
possible gaging locations and pros and cons of each.
Once a preferred location is determined, the USGS
will work with landowners to obtain permissions and
regulatory permits as applicable. The USGS will be
responsible for all permitting and environmental
compliance and will follow internal protocol for
acquiring any necessary approvals. The USGS will
then acquire necessary equipment based on location
requirements and will install the streamflow gage. All
equipment is purchased and owned by the USGS.
The City has successfully partnered with the USGS on
the installation, operation, and maintenance of the
streamflow gage on Maroon Creek.
NRCS SNOTEL SITE
Aspen will work with NRCS to execute an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) for the cost share of the
SNOTEL site. The NRCS has already completed some preliminary analyses to identify some potential
locations for the SNOTEL site. The NRCS will work with Aspen to conduct some preliminary reconnaissance
trips to the identified locations. Any areas that show potential will be identified and NRCS will work with
Aspen to conduct on-site measurements for one or two snow seasons, depending on the findings during
the first year. It is anticipated that these will be completed during the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 winter
seasons. The goal is to determine if
measured snowpack at a given site is
representative of the area and is correlating
with local basin conditions. Once a
preferred location is determined, the NRCS
will work with landowners to obtain
permissions and regulatory permits when
applicable. The NRCS will be responsible for
all permitting and environmental
compliance and will follow internal protocol
for acquiring any necessary approvals. The
NRCS will then acquire necessary
equipment based on location requirements
and will install the SNOTEL instrumentation.
All equipment is purchased and owned by
the NRCS.
23
City of Aspen PAGE 15
PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE
3.5 EVALUATION CRITERION E
Nexus to Reclamation (10 Points)
The proposed project is not directly connected to Reclamation project activities, however, any data
collected from the new USGS streamflow gage and the NRCS SNOTEL site will be publicly available. This
streamflow and snowpack data will be relied upon regionally within the Colorado River Basin to support
operational, supply management, and modelling efforts beyond just the City of Aspen. According to the
US Bureau of Reclamation Upper Colorado River Basin website, “the challenge of the future is to manage
the quantity, and maintain the quality of the finite water resources in a region which is experiencing
dramatic population growth, and related impacts to aquatic ecosystems, while often during extended
periods of drought”. Additional hydrologic data to support drought response and water supply
management in the Aspen area directly addresses this challenge.
3.6 EVALUATION CRITERION F
Department of the Interior and Bureau of Reclamation Priorities (10 Points)
Department of the Interior Priorities
Creating a conservation stewardship legacy second only to Teddy Roosevelt
The City of Aspen is committed to the efficient and effective use of water as a precious resource. The City
takes seriously its responsibility of being located at the headwaters of the Roaring Fork Watershed in the
Upper Colorado River Basin, protecting the quality and availability of water through the river system
downstream. Aspen has adopted a policy to maintain streamflows in the creeks downstream of its
diversion structures at flow rates at or above the Colorado Water
Conservation Board’s decreed instream flow rights for the protection of the
fishery and associated aquatic habitats in those streams. Aspen has
become the first utility in the State of Colorado to adopt the Qualified
Water Efficient Landscape (“QWEL”) Certification Program and have
recently adopted some of the most rigorous Water Efficient Landscaping
and Irrigation Standards in the state. The City takes very seriously its stewardship and leadership position
24
City of Aspen PAGE 16
as a water utility, applying best practices to manage water resources. The City relies on statewide water
supply planning and climate change studies for its municipal water supply planning and drought response
program development and operation.
Utilizing our natural resources
In addition to the ongoing efforts through projects and programs to most efficiently utilize its water
resources, the City of Aspen was the first city west of the Mississippi to have hydroelectric powered
streetlights. It was built to service the mines in the area and municipal power was an afterthought. Today,
the City of Aspen electric system uses 100% renewable energy (46% hydroelectric, 53% wind power, 1%
landfill gas). The City is transitioning all electrical services to Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI),
which will save energy and build a foundation for energy conservation programs in the future, which is
expected to save 1,320,000 KWH annually. The installation of a new USGS streamflow gage and NRCS
SNOTEL site will help the City monitor local conditions for potential water shortages, allowing the City to
address any anticipated drought or water shortage conditions early. Early water shortage identification
and response will mitigate impacts to hydroelectric power generation due to a reduction in available
supplies during drought.
Restoring trust with local communities
Access to data collected from both the USGS streamflow gage and the NRCS SNOTEL site will be publicly
available and will provide benefit to other local organizations in the Roaring Fork Basin and the greater
Colorado River Basin. Data sharing benefits Federal, State, local, and Tribal organizations, supporting a
diverse set of needs. Additional data will also support local and regional outreach and education efforts,
contributing information on local hydrology.
Bureau of Reclamation Priorities
Leverage Science and Technology to Improve Water Supply Reliability to Communities
USGS streamflow gages utilize instrumentation to generate continuous real-time streamflow information
year-round, applying different technology based on streamflow measurement needs and site access.
Measurement methods include the traditional float/stilling-well method and newer methods that utilize
pressure transducers, gas-purge (bubbler) systems or radar sensors. Streamflow is computed from
measured water levels using a site-specific relation (called a stage-discharge rating curve) developed from
onsite water level and streamflow measurements made by USGS hydrographers. The collection of USGS
streamflow gages constitute the National Streamflow Network (NSN). The data collected at NSN
streamflow gages serve several functions including flood warning, water allocation, and recreation, and is
publicly available. The use of consistent methods enables data from the many gages to be combined,
expanding the use and value of the data from every gage.
NRCS SNOTEL sites utilize meteor burst communications technology to collect and communicate data in
near-real-time and are used to monitor snowpack, precipitation, temperature, and other climatic
conditions. Data are transmitted to a central database, called the Water and Climate Information System,
where they are used for water supply forecasting, maps, and reports.
These two types of hydrologic monitoring sites are relied upon by a variety of agencies that support water
supply operations, planning, environmental health, and recreation. Increasing the availability of reliable,
tested, and maintained data collection instrumentation provides a resource for local communities to
support planning and operation of water supplies.
25
City of Aspen PAGE 17
Address Ongoing Drought
Localized data provides more reliable and relevant drought monitoring information to the City of Aspen
and neighboring communities. This helps Aspen respond more quickly and be better informed of changing
or worsening drought conditions. Because these two stations will be located based primarily on Aspen’s
needs, the information collected will more directly indicate current and anticipated hydrologic conditions.
With better information, Aspen can tailor its drought response actions to the unique circumstances of a
given drought, reducing impacts on supply availability as well as impacts to the community.
26
City of Aspen PAGE 18
4. PROJECT BUDGET
The project budget includes:
(1) Funding plan and letters of commitment (N/A)
(2) Budget proposal
(3) Budget narrative
4.1 FUNDING PLAN AND LETTERS OF COMMITMENT
The City of Aspen will fund the non-Federal share of project costs from their Enterprise Fund for Water
Utility which is fully funded through revenue from monthly billing, tap fees, permit review fees, and other
miscellaneous revenue sources. There shall be no funding provided by a source other than the applicant.
No project costs will be incurred prior to award.
Table 2: Total Project Cost: Summary of Federal and Non-Federal Funding Sources
Funding Source Amount
Costs to be reimbursed with the requested Federal Funding $59,446.55
Costs to be paid by applicant $59,446.55
Value of third-party contributions $-
Total Project Cost $118,893.10
27
City of Aspen PAGE 19
4.2 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Table 3: Proposed Project Budget
Budget Item Description $/Unit Quantity Quantity Type Total Cost
Salaries and Wages
Steve Hunter, Utilities Resource
Manager $ 55.69 60 Human Resource $ 3,341.40
Tyler Christoff, Director of Utilities $ 69.22 20 Human Resource $ 1,384.40
Robert Covington, Water
Resources/Hydroelectric Supervisor $ 43.41 30 Human Resource $ 1,302.30
Attorney Costs (In-house) $ 75.00 5 Human Resource $ 375.00
Fringe Benefits
Travel
USGS Streamflow Gage
Travel and Vehicle Costs $ 6,710.00 1 EA $ 6,710.00
Equipment
USGS Streamflow Gage
Stage Sensor for Basic Installation $ 5,500.00 1 EA $ 5,500.00
Additional Instrumentation for Bank-
Type Cableways (if needed) $ 12,000.00 1 EA $ 12,000.00
Supplies and Materials
USGS Streamflow Gage
Instrumentation for Basic Installation $ 12,500.00 1 EA $ 12,500.00
NRCS SNOTEL Site
Instrumentation $ 40,000.00 1 EA $ 40,000.00
Contractual/Construction
Management and Tracking
Grant Management and Reporting $ 9,500.00 1 EA $ 9,500.00
USGS Streamflow Gage
Basic Installation Including Field and
Analytical Work, Travel, and Labor $ 11,280.00 1 EA $ 11,280.00
Installation for Bank-Type Cableways (if
needed) $ 15,000.00 1 EA $ 15,000.00
NRCS SNOTEL Site
Installation NA NA
Third-Party Contributions
$ -
Other
$ -
Total Direct Costs $ 118,893.10
Indirect Costs
Administrative Rate Percentage $base $ -
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $ 118,893.10
28
City of Aspen PAGE 20
4.3 BUDGET NARRATIVE
The budget narrative provides a discussion of, or explanation for, items included in the budget proposal.
The types of information to describe in the narrative include, but are not limited to, those listed in the
following subsections.
4.3.1 SALARIES AND W AGES
The salaries and wages include staff time to administer and manage the program and to coordinate
contracting entities. The Project Manager for this project is Steve Hunter, Utilities Resource Manager for
the Utilities Department at the City of Aspen. Mr. Hunter will be responsible for working with consultants
on the development and submittal of a fully completed form SF-425 Federal Financial Report, an interim
program performance report, and the final performance report to Reclamation upon completion of the
project. Mr. Hunter will be responsible for all technical coordination and installation management for the
City of Aspen in coordination with USGS and NRCS. Additional staff time is included for on-site
investigations and installation as well as efforts to support development of intergovernmental
agreements with USGS and NRCS. Hourly labor rates and estimated hours included in this proposal are
included in Table 3. Hourly rate represents staff direct hourly wages. Hours spent directly contributing to
this project will be tracked and reported as a portion of the matching fund contributions.
4.3.2 FRINGE BENEFITS
Fringe benefits are not included in this project application.
4.3.3 TRAVEL
Travel is included for USGS streamflow gage installation and includes costs associated with vehicle rental,
lodging, and other associated expenses.
4.3.4 EQUIPMENT
For the USGS streamflow gage, a stage sensor for basic streamgage installation exceeds $5,000 for that
piece of equipment. Should a bank-type cableway be required at the selected site, the additional
instrumentation is purchased as a single piece of equipment and also exceeds $5,000. All equipment will
be purchased by USGS using funding from the City.
4.3.5 MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
All materials and supplies associated with the USGS streamflow gage will be purchased by the USGS. The
typical streamflow gage includes an instrumentation shelter, data collection platform, stage sensor,
antenna, solar panel, voltage regulator, batteries, reference gages, crest-stage gage, and benchmark
survey points. Likewise, all materials and supplies associated with the NRCS SNOTEL instrumentation will
be purchased by the NRCS. A typical SNOTEL remote site consists of measuring devices and sensors, an
equipment shelter for the radio telemetry equipment, and an antenna that also supports the solar panels
used to keep batteries charged. All materials and supplies for both measurement sites will be funded by
Aspen.
4.3.6 C ONTRACTUAL
The City of Aspen will partner with both the USGS and NRCS for installation, calibration, and testing of
both the new USGS streamflow gage and the new NRCS SNOTEL site. Each agency will be responsible for
all labor associated with the installation and operation of the measurement sites. Costs for installation of
the USGS streamflow gage include the basic installation and the potential for a bank-type cableway if
29
City of Aspen PAGE 21
needed based on the selected location. NRCS will cover the full cost of labor associated with installation,
calibration, and testing of the new SNOTEL site, so no contractual costs are included. Aspen will be
responsible for all installation costs including field and analytical work and labor as completed by USGS
for the streamflow gage.
The City will work with a consultant to complete all required reporting and grant management efforts to
support the City should a grant be awarded. The cost is less than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold,
allowing the City to contract without a competitive procurement process.
4.3.7 THIRD-P ARTY IN-K IND C ONTRIBUTIONS
No work included with this project will be accomplished by third-party contributors.
4.3.8 ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY C OMPLIANCE C OSTS
Any environmental and regulatory compliance costs will be the responsibility of USGS and NRCS. The City
of Aspen does not anticipate any environmental and regulatory compliance costs to be included under
this grant budget.
4.3.9 O THER EXPENSES
None.
4.3.10 INDIRECT COSTS
No indirect costs are included in this project budget.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES COMPLIANCE
To allow Reclamation to assess the probable environmental and cultural resources impacts and costs
associated with each application, we have included responses to the following list of provided questions
focusing on the NEPA, ESA, and NHPA requirements.
Impacts from the siting of the USGS streamflow gage and the NRCS SNOTEL site are expected to be
minimal due to the small footprint, short construction period, and limited need to access the sites. Final
site selection will consider opportunities to minimize environmental impacts by using sites adjacent to
existing private or public roads. The USGS anticipates a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under NEPA policy at
Departmental Manual 516, Chapter 9,5, Categorical Exclusions. Part 650.6 of 7 CFR identifies the Snow
Survey and Water Supply Forecasting Program (data gathering and interpretation) as categorically
excluded from detailed review under NEPA.
Will the proposed project impact the surrounding environment (e.g., soil [dust], air, water [quality
and quantity], animal habitat)? Please briefly describe all earth-disturbing work and any work that
will affect the air, water, or animal habitat in the project area. Please also explain the impacts of such
work on the surrounding environment and any steps that could be taken to minimize the impacts.
Installation of the new measurement sites will have small, if any, environmental impacts and both require
minimal earth-disturbing activities. Active installation of each station will take only a few days, depending
on weather conditions and site access. Each site’s footprint will be as small as possible to minimize any
impacts on the surrounding environment. Vegetation may be removed for installation access and to
support ideal conditions for consistent data collection. For the SNOTEL site, ground disturbance may
30
City of Aspen PAGE 22
include leveling a 10-foot diameter pad, digging ten 2-foot diameter holes, digging two trenches, and may
involve one skid-steer type piece of equipment used over two days. Total site area needed is about 900
square-feet, but the amount ground disturbance will be limited within this area.
Are you aware of any species listed or proposed to be listed as a Federal threatened or endangered
species, or designated critical habitat in the project area? If so, would they be affected by any
activities associated with the proposed project?
No threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat will be affected by any activities
associated with the Project. Pitkin County does not contain any federally listed threatened or endangered
species. Many lakes and streams in Pitkin County contain Colorado River Cutthroat Trout, which is a
Colorado species of special concern due to its limited numbers and fragile ecosystem requirements. Both
agencies will work with the State biologist to determine if any threatened and endangered species are
present and will consider alternative locations and mitigation activities if any are present.
Are there wetlands or other surface waters inside the project boundaries that potentially fall under
CWA jurisdiction as “Waters of the United States?” If so, please describe and estimate any impacts
the proposed project may have.
Portions of Castle Creek may be considered navigable, however, there are no anticipated impacts to the
Creek during the installation or operation of the USGS streamflow gage. In fact, USGS streamflow gages
are often relied upon to support the Navigable Waters Protection Rule and help identify waters of the
united states. There are no wetlands or other surface waters inside the project boundaries that will be
impacted by the NRCS SNOTEL site.
When was the water delivery system constructed?
The earliest parts of the original water delivery system were constructed in the late-1800s. In 1956, the
City of Aspen began operating the Municipal Water Utility. In 1957, Aspen voters approved a bond
proposal adopting a plan for acquisition and improvement of the water works system and for repayment
of the costs incurred in the acquisition and improvement program.
Will the proposed project result in any modification of or effects to, individual features of an
irrigation system (e.g., headgates, canals, or flumes)? If so, state when those features were
constructed and describe the nature and timing of any extensive alterations or modifications to those
features completed previously.
There will be no modification of or effects to any portion of an irrigation system because of this project.
Are any buildings, structures, or features in the irrigation district listed or eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places? A cultural resources specialist at your local Reclamation office
or the State Historic Preservation Office can assist in answering this question.
There is no anticipated impact to any buildings, structures, or features listed or eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places.
Are there any known archeological sites in the proposed project area?
There are no known archeological sites in the proposed project area.
31
City of Aspen PAGE 23
Will the proposed project have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or
minority populations?
There will be no disproportionately high or adverse effects on low income or minority populations because
of this project.
Will the proposed project limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites or result in other
impacts on tribal lands?
The proposed project will not impact tribal lands or access to/ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites.
Will the proposed project contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious
weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area?
The proposed project will not contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious
weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area.
6. REQUIRED PERMITS OR APPROVALS
Land on which the streamflow gage or SNOTEL station are installed will likely not be owned by the City,
the USGS, or the NRCS. A deed, special use permit, easement, or cooperative agreement may be required
for each of the sites. Site authorizations will ensure use of the site as a permanent installation to assure
continuity of data. The USGS gage will likely qualify for a categorical exclusion under the USGS National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) policy at Departmental Manual 516, Chapter 9,5, Categorical Exclusions.
For the SNOTEL site, NRCS anticipates the need for a Special Use Permit through the US Forest Service.
Additionally, Part 650.6 of 7 CFR identifies the Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting Program (data
gathering and interpretation) as categorically excluded from detailed review under NEPA. For the NRCS
SNOTEL site, a 400-foot radial vegetation management buffer will likely be applied to minimize impacts
to the site where any anticipated changes will be mutually agreed to and communicated with the
landowner in advance. Locations that require trees to be removed for either site to be suitable may
require special permissions or permits to cut the trees. Any required permits will be identified and
obtained through the USGS for the streamflow gage or through the NRCS for the SNOTEL site.
7. OFFICIAL RESOLUTION
The next Council meeting will be held on August 25, 2020, during which an Official Resolution will be
presented and signed. This will be provided in support of this grant application upon completion.
32
Page 1 of 2
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM:Andy Rossello, Project Manager III
THRU:Ryan Loebach, Sr. Project Manager
Tyler Christoff, Director of Utilities
DATE OF MEMO:August 17th, 2020
MEETING DATE:August 25th, 2020
RE:Contract with The Prysmian Group for Electric System Cable
Testing
REQUEST OF COUNCIL:Staff requests contract award to The Prysmian Group in the amount
of $78,500.00 for testing of existing electric cable using Pry-Cam technology.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council has reviewed funding for this project through the
2020 budget approval process.
BACKGROUND:The majority of the City of Aspen electric distribution system consists of 30-
year old electric cable, directly buried in the ground. This cable is approaching the end of its
designed lifespan, and City staff are developing a cable replacement program and strategies to
better inform cable replacement priorities. The preferred prioritization strategy is to test each of
the City’s electric cables integrity to determine remaining useful life.
DISCUSSION:City staff has reviewed the Pry-Cam technology and hosted Prysmian to conduct
a trial demonstration of the Pry-Cam technology on a select few cable segments within the City.
Staff then worked with our electric engineering consultant to review the testing technology’s
accuracy and usefulness reports generated by Prysmian. City staff are recommending PRY-CAM
technology assessment equipment for the following reasons: cable can be tested in place without
disconnecting power, customer disruptions, or damaging the cable. No other known testing
methods can mitigate customer impacts or guarantee existing cable will not be damaged in the
testing process. Staff believes that Pry-Cam technology will best inform cable replacement
prioritization.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Staff recommends awarding a sole source professional
services contract to The Prysmian Group based on their qualifications and reasons provided
above. Proposed project funding and expenditures are outlined below:
Total Project Expenditures
The Prysmian Group $78,500.00
33
Page 2 of 2
Contingency $ 6,500.00
Total $85,000.00
Funding Budgeted
Utilities 2020 Funding
Project 51126 Cable Testing and Replacement $50,000.00
Project 51271 Electric System Assessment Projects $35,000.00
Total $85,000.00
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:Maintaining and improving the City’s electric distribution
system creates a more efficient and resilient system for customers. Infrastructure reinvestment
allows the utility to minimize losses and continue to provide a high level of customer service to
the community.
ALTERNATIVES:City staff and consultants analyzed other electric cable testing methods and
determined Pry-Cam to be the most accurate, least impactful to existing electric cable. Should
council chose not to award this contract, City staff would begin replacing cable without knowing
which electric cable segment is most likely to fail.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff requests contract award to The Prysmian Group in the
amount of $78,500.00 for testing of existing electric cable using Pry-Cam technology.
PROPOSED MOTION:I move to approve Resolution #71of 2020.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Contract with The Prysmian Group
B. Resolution # 71 of 2020
34
RESOLUTION # 71
(Series of 2020)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO, APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN
AND THE PRYSMIAN GROUP. AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council a Contract for the
testing of electric cable within the City electric system, between the City of Aspen
and The Prysmian Group, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit “A”;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves that Contract
for the testing of electric cable between the City of Aspen and The Prysmian
Group, a copy of which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein, and does
hereby authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City
of Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Aspen on the 25
th day of August, 2020.
Torre, Mayor
I, Nicole Henning, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the
foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City
Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held, August 25th, 2020.
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
35
Agreement Professional Services Page 0
CITY OF ASPEN STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
City of Aspen Contract No.: 2020-51126
AGREEMENT made this 5th day of August, in the year 2020.
BETWEEN the City:
Contract Amount:
The City of Aspen
c/o Sara Ott
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone: (970) 920-5079
And the Professional:
Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC
c/o Brian DiLascia
700 Industrial Drive
Lexington, SC 29072
Phone: 803-951-4800
For the Following Project:
Pry-Cam partial discharge testing, condition assessment, and reports
Exhibits appended and made a part of this Agreement:
If this Agreement requires the City to pay
an amount of money in excess of
$50,000.00 it shall not be deemed valid
until it has been approved by the City
Council of the City of Aspen.
City Council Approval:
Date: ___________________________
Resolution No.:___________________
Exhibit A: Scope of Work.
Total: $78,500.00
36
Agreement Professional Services Page 1
The City and Professional agree as set forth below.
1. Scope of Work. Professional shall perform in a competent and professional manner the
Scope of Work as set forth at Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
2. Completion. Professional shall commence Work immediately upon receipt of a written Notice
to Proceed from the City and complete all phases of the Scope of Work as expeditiously as is
consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work in a timely manner.
The parties anticipate that all Work pursuant to this Agreement shall be completed no later than
December 20th, 2020. Upon request of the City, Professional shall submit, for the City's approval, a
schedule for the performance of Professional's services which shall be adjusted as required as the
project proceeds, and which shall include allowances for periods of time required by the City's
project engineer for review and approval of submissions and for approvals of authorities having
jurisdiction over the project. This schedule, when approved by the City, shall not, except for
reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Professional.
3. Payment. In consideration of the work performed, City shall pay Professional on a time and
expense basis for all work performed. The hourly rates for work performed by Professional shall not
exceed those hourly rates set forth at Exhibit A appended hereto. Except as otherwise mutually
agreed to by the parties the payments made to Professional shall not initially exceed the amount set
forth above. Professional shall submit, in timely fashion, invoices for work performed. The City
shall review such invoices and, if they are considered incorrect or untimely, the City shall review
the matter with Professional within ten days from receipt of the Professional's bill.
4. Non-Assignability. Both parties recognize that this Agreement is one for personal services
and cannot be transferred, assigned, or sublet by either party without prior written consent of the
other. Sub-Contracting, if authorized, shall not relieve the Professional of any of the responsibilities
or obligations under this Agreement. Professional shall be and remain solely responsible to the City
for the acts, errors, omissions or neglect of any subcontractors’ officers, agents and employees, each
of whom shall, for this purpose be deemed to be an agent or employee of the Professional to the
extent of the subcontract. The City shall not be obligated to pay or be liable for payment of any
sums due which may be due to any sub-contractor.
5. Termination of Procurement. The sale contemplated by this Agreement may be
canceled by the City prior to acceptance by the City whenever for any reason and in its sole
discretion the City shall determine that such cancellation is in its best interests and convenience.
6. Termination of Professional Services. The Professional or the City may terminate the
Professional Services component of this Agreement, without specifying the reason therefor, by
giving notice, in writing, addressed to the other party, specifying the effective date of the
termination. No fees shall be earned after the effective date of the termination. Upon any
termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models,
photographs, reports or other material prepared by the Professional pursuant to this Agreement
shall become the property of the City. Notwithstanding the above, Professional shall not be
relieved of any liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of
this Agreement by the Professional, and the City may withhold any payments to the Professional
37
Agreement Professional Services Page 2
for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from the
Professional may be determined.
7.Independent Contractor Status. It is expressly acknowledged and understood by the parties
that nothing contained in this agreement shall result in, or be construed as establishing an
employment relationship. Professional shall be, and shall perform as, an independent Contractor
who agrees to use his or her best efforts to provide the said services on behalf of the City. No agent,
employee, or servant of Professional shall be, or shall be deemed to be, the employee, agent or
servant of the City. City is interested only in the results obtained under this contract. The manner
and means of conducting the work are under the sole control of Professional. None of the benefits
provided by City to its employees including, but not limited to, workers' compensation insurance
and unemployment insurance, are available from City to the employees, agents or servants of
Professional. Professional shall be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of
Professional's agents, employees, servants and subcontractors during the performance of this
contract. Professional shall indemnify City against all liability and loss in connection with, and
shall assume full responsibility for payment of all federal, state and local taxes or contributions
imposed or required under unemployment insurance, social security and income tax law, with
respect to Professional and/or Professional's employees engaged in the performance of the services
agreed to herein.
8.Indemnification. Professional agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers,
employees, insurers, and self-insurance pool, from and against all liability, claims, and demands, on
account of injury, loss, or damage, including without limitation claims arising from bodily injury,
personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage, or any other loss of any kind
whatsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with this contract, to the extent and
for an amount represented by the degree or percentage such injury, loss, or damage is caused in
whole or in part by, or is claimed to be caused in whole or in part by, the wrongful act, omission,
error, professional error, mistake, negligence, or other fault of the Professional, any subcontractor of
the Professional, or any officer, employee, representative, or agent of the Professional or of any
subcontractor of the Professional, or which arises out of any workmen's compensation claim of any
employee of the Professional or of any employee of any subcontractor of the Professional. The
Professional agrees to investigate, handle, respond to, and to provide defense for and defend against,
any such liability, claims or demands at the sole expense of the Professional, or at the option of the
City, agrees to pay the City or reimburse the City for the defense costs incurred by the City in
connection with, any such liability, claims, or demands. If it is determined by the final judgment of
a court of competent jurisdiction that such injury, loss, or damage was caused in whole or in part by
the act, omission, or other fault of the City, its officers, or its employees, the City shall reimburse
the Professional for the portion of the judgment attributable to such act, omission, or other fault of
the City, its officers, or employees.
9.Professional's Insurance.
(a) Professional agrees to procure and maintain, at its own expense, a policy or policies
of insurance sufficient to insure against all liability, claims, demands, and other obligations
assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. Such insurance shall be in
addition to any other insurance requirements imposed by this contract or by law. The
Professional shall not be relieved of any liability, claims, demands, or other obligations
assumed pursuant to Section 8 above by reason of its failure to procure or maintain
38
Agreement Professional Services Page 3
insurance, or by reason of its failure to procure or maintain insurance in sufficient amounts,
duration, or types.
(b) Professional shall procure and maintain, and shall cause any subcontractor of the
Professional to procure and maintain, the minimum insurance coverages listed below. Such
coverages shall be procured and maintained with forms and insurance acceptable to the City.
All coverages shall be continuously maintained to cover all liability, claims, demands, and
other obligations assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. In the case of
any claims-made policy, the necessary retroactive dates and extended reporting periods shall
be procured to maintain such continuous coverage.
(i)Workers’ Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by
applicable laws for any employee engaged in the performance of work under this
contract, and Employers' Liability insurance with minimum limits of ONE
MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) for each accident, ONE MILLION
DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) disease - policy limit, and TWO MILLION DOLLARS
($2,000,000.00) disease - each employee. Evidence of qualified self-insured status
may be substituted for the Workers' Compensation requirements of this paragraph.
(ii) Commercial General Liability insurance with minimum combined single
limits of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and TWO
MILLION DOLLARS ($2,000,000.00) aggregate. The policy shall be applicable to
all premises and operations. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury,
broad form property damage (including completed operations), personal injury
(including coverage for contractual and employee acts), blanket contractual,
independent contractors, products, and completed operations. The policy shall
contain a severability of interests provision.
(iii) Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance with minimum combined
single limits for bodily injury and property damage of not less than ONE MILLION
DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and TWO MILLION DOLLARS
($2,000,000.00) aggregate with respect to each Professional's owned, hired and non-
owned vehicles assigned to or used in performance of the Scope of Work. The
policy shall contain a severability of interests provision. If the Professional has no
owned automobiles, the requirements of this Section shall be met by each employee
of the Professional providing services to the City under this contract.
(iv) Professional Liability insurance with the minimum limits of ONE MILLION
DOLLARS ($1,000,000) each claim and TWO MILLION DOLLARS ($2,000,000)
aggregate.
(c) The policy or policies required above shall be endorsed to include the City and the City's
officers and employees as additional insureds. Every policy required above shall be primary
insurance, and any insurance carried by the City, its officers or employees, or carried by or
provided through any insurance pool of the City, shall be excess and not contributory
insurance to that provided by Professional. No additional insured endorsement to the policy
required above shall contain any exclusion for bodily injury or property damage arising
from completed operations. The Professional shall be solely responsible for any deductible
losses under any policy required above.
39
Agreement Professional Services Page 4
(d) The certificate of insurance provided to the City shall be completed by the Professional's
insurance agent as evidence that policies providing the required coverages, conditions, and
minimum limits are in full force and effect, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City
prior to commencement of the contract. No other form of certificate shall be used. The
certificate shall identify this contract and shall provide that the coverages afforded under the
policies shall not be canceled, terminated or materially changed until at least thirty (30) days
prior written notice has been given to the City.
(e) Failure on the part of the Professional to procure or maintain policies providing the
required coverages, conditions, and minimum limits shall constitute a material breach of
contract upon which City may immediately terminate this contract, or at its discretion City
may procure or renew any such policy or any extended reporting period thereto and may pay
any and all premiums in connection therewith, and all monies so paid by City shall be repaid
by Professional to City upon demand, or City may offset the cost of the premiums against
monies due to Professional from City.
(f) City reserves the right to request and receive a certified copy of any policy and any
endorsement thereto.
(g) The parties hereto understand and agree that City is relying on, and does not waive or
intend to waive by any provision of this contract, the monetary limitations (presently
$350,000.00 per person and $990,000 per occurrence) or any other rights, immunities, and
protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, Section 24-10-101 et
seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or otherwise available to City, its officers, or its
employees.
10.City's Insurance. The parties hereto understand that the City is a member of the Colorado
Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) and as such participates in the CIRSA Proper-
ty/Casualty Pool. Copies of the CIRSA policies and manual are kept at the City of Aspen Risk
Management Department and are available to Professional for inspection during normal business
hours. City makes no representations whatsoever with respect to specific coverages offered by
CIRSA. City shall provide Professional reasonable notice of any changes in its membership or
participation in CIRSA.
11.Completeness of Agreement. It is expressly agreed that this agreement contains the entire
undertaking of the parties relevant to the subject matter thereof and there are no verbal or written
representations, agreements, warranties or promises pertaining to the project matter thereof not
expressly incorporated in this writing.
12.Notice. Any written notices as called for herein may be hand delivered or mailed by
certified mail return receipt requested to the respective persons and/or addresses listed above.
13.Non-Discrimination. No discrimination because of race, color, creed, sex, marital status,
affectional or sexual orientation, family responsibility, national origin, ancestry, handicap, or
religion shall be made in the employment of persons to perform services under this contract.
Professional agrees to meet all of the requirements of City's municipal code, Section 15.04.570,
pertaining to non-discrimination in employment.
40
Agreement Professional Services Page 5
14.Waiver. The waiver by the City of any term, covenant, or condition hereof shall not operate
as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term. No term, covenant, or condition
of this Agreement can be waived except by the written consent of the City, and forbearance or
indulgence by the City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of any term, covenant,
or condition to be performed by Professional to which the same may apply and, until complete
performance by Professional of said term, covenant or condition, the City shall be entitled to invoke
any remedy available to it under this Agreement or by law despite any such forbearance or
indulgence.
15.Execution of Agreement by City. This Agreement shall be binding upon all parties hereto
and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained herein, this Agreement shall not be binding upon the City unless
duly executed by the Mayor of the City of Aspen (or a duly authorized official in his absence)
following a Motion or Resolution of the Council of the City of Aspen authorizing the Mayor (or a
duly authorized official in his absence) to execute the same.
16. Illegal Aliens – CRS 8-17.5-101 & 24-76.5-101.
(a) Purpose. During the 2006 Colorado legislative session, the Legislature passed
House Bills 06-1343 (subsequently amended by HB 07-1073) and 06-1023 that added
new statutes relating to the employment of and contracting with illegal aliens. These new
laws prohibit all state agencies and political subdivisions, including the City of Aspen,
from knowingly hiring an illegal alien to perform work under a contract, or to knowingly
contract with a subcontractor who knowingly hires with an illegal alien to perform work
under the contract. The new laws also require that all contracts for services include
certain specific language as set forth in the statutes. The following terms and conditions
have been designed to comply with the requirements of this new law.
(b) Definitions. The following terms are defined in the new law and by this reference
are incorporated herein and in any contract for services entered into with the City of
Aspen.
“Basic Pilot Program” means the basic pilot employment verification program
created in Public Law 208, 104th Congress, as amended, and expanded in Public
Law 156, 108th Congress, as amended, that is administered by the United States
Department of Homeland Security.
“Public Contract for Services” means this Agreement.
“Services” means the furnishing of labor, time, or effort by a Contractor or a
subcontractor not involving the delivery of a specific end product other than
reports that are merely incidental to the required performance.
(c) By signing this document, Professional certifies and represents that at this time:
(i) Professional shall confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who
are newly hired for employment in the United States; and
41
Agreement Professional Services Page 6
(ii) Professional has participated or attempted to participate in the Basic Pilot
Program in order to verify that new employees are not illegal aliens.
(d) Professional hereby confirms that:
(i) Professional shall not knowingly employ or contract new employees
without confirming the employment eligibility of all such employees hired for
employment in the United States under the Public Contract for Services.
(ii) Professional shall not enter into a contract with a subcontractor that fails to
confirm to the Professional that the subcontractor shall not knowingly hire new
employees without confirming their employment eligibility for employment in the
United States under the Public Contract for Services.
(iii) Professional has verified or has attempted to verify through participation
in the Federal Basic Pilot Program that Professional does not employ any new
employees who are not eligible for employment in the United States; and if
Professional has not been accepted into the Federal Basic Pilot Program prior to
entering into the Public Contract for Services, Professional shall forthwith apply
to participate in the Federal Basic Pilot Program and shall in writing verify such
application within five (5) days of the date of the Public Contract. Professional
shall continue to apply to participate in the Federal Basic Pilot Program and shall
in writing verify same every three (3) calendar months thereafter, until
Professional is accepted or the public contract for services has been completed,
whichever is earlier. The requirements of this section shall not be required or
effective if the Federal Basic Pilot Program is discontinued.
(iv) Professional shall not use the Basic Pilot Program procedures to undertake
pre-employment screening of job applicants while the Public Contract for
Services is being performed.
(v) If Professional obtains actual knowledge that a subcontractor performing
work under the Public Contract for Services knowingly employs or contracts with
a new employee who is an illegal alien, Professional shall:
(1) Notify such subcontractor and the City of Aspen within three days
that Professional has actual knowledge that the subcontractor has newly
employed or contracted with an illegal alien; and
(2) Terminate the subcontract with the subcontractor if within three
days of receiving the notice required pursuant to this section the
subcontractor does not cease employing or contracting with the new
employee who is an illegal alien; except that Professional shall not
terminate the Public Contract for Services with the subcontractor if during
such three days the subcontractor provides information to establish that the
subcontractor has not knowingly employed or contracted with an illegal
alien.
42
Agreement Professional Services Page 7
(vi) Professional shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado
Department of Labor and Employment made in the course of an investigation that
the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment undertakes or is undertaking
pursuant to the authority established in Subsection 8-17.5-102 (5), C.R.S.
(vii) If Professional violates any provision of the Public Contract for Services
pertaining to the duties imposed by Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. the City of
Aspen may terminate the Public Contract for Services. If the Public Contract for
Services is so terminated, Contractor shall be liable for actual and consequential
damages to the City of Aspen arising out of Professional’s violation of Subsection
8-17.5-102, C.R.S.
(ix) If Professional operates as a sole proprietor, Professional hereby swears or
affirms under penalty of perjury that the Professional (1) is a citizen of the United
States or otherwise lawfully present in the United States pursuant to federal law,
(2) shall comply with the provisions of CRS 24-76.5-101 et seq., and (3) shall
produce one of the forms of identification required by CRS 24-76.5-103 prior to
the effective date of this Agreement.
17. Warranties Against Contingent Fees, Gratuities, Kickbacks and Conflicts of Interest.
(a) Professional warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or
retained to solicit or secure this Contract upon an agreement or understanding for a
commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or
bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the Professional for
the purpose of securing business.
(b) Professional agrees not to give any employee of the City a gratuity or any offer of
employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation,
preparation of any part of a program requirement or a purchase request, influencing the
content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering advice, investigation,
auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any proceeding or application, request for
ruling, determination, claim or controversy, or other particular matter, pertaining to this
Agreement, or to any solicitation or proposal therefore.
(c) Professional represents that no official, officer, employee or representative of the
City during the term of this Agreement has or one (1) year thereafter shall have any
interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof, except those that
may have been disclosed at the time City Council approved the execution of this
Agreement.
(d) In addition to other remedies it may have for breach of the prohibitions against
contingent fees, gratuities, kickbacks and conflict of interest, the City shall have the right
to:
1.Cancel this Purchase Agreement without any liability by the City;
2.Debar or suspend the offending parties from being a Professional, contractor or
subcontractor under City contracts;
43
Agreement Professional Services Page 8
3.Deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the value of
anything transferred or received by the Professional; and
4.Recover such value from the offending parties.
18. Fund Availability. Financial obligations of the City payable after the current fiscal year
are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated, budgeted and otherwise made
available. If this Agreement contemplates the City utilizing state or federal funds to meet its
obligations herein, this Agreement shall be contingent upon the availability of those funds for
payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
19. General Terms.
(a) It is agreed that neither this Agreement nor any of its terms, provisions, conditions,
representations or covenants can be modified, changed, terminated or amended, waived,
superseded or extended except by appropriate written instrument fully executed by the
parties.
(b) If any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or
unenforceable it shall not affect or impair the validity, legality or enforceability of any other
provision.
(c) The parties acknowledge and understand that there are no conditions or limitations
to this understanding except those as contained herein at the time of the execution hereof
and that after execution no alteration, change or modification shall be made except upon a
writing signed by the parties.
(d) This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado as from time
to time in effect. Venue is agreed to be exclusively in the courts of Pitkin County,
Colorado.
20. Electronic Signatures and Electronic Records This Agreement and any
amendments hereto may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, and all of which together shall constitute one agreement binding on the Parties,
notwithstanding the possible event that all Parties may not have signed the same counterpart.
Furthermore, each Party consents to the use of electronic signatures by either Party. The Scope
of Work, and any other documents requiring a signature hereunder, may be signed electronically
in the manner agreed to by the Parties. The Parties agree not to deny the legal effect or
enforceability of the Agreement solely because it is in electronic form or because an electronic
record was used in its formation. The Parties agree not to object to the admissibility of the
Agreement in the form of an electronic record, or a paper copy of an electronic documents, or a
paper copy of a document bearing an electronic signature, on the grounds that it is an electronic
record or electronic signature or that it is not in its original form or is not an original.
20.Successors and Assigns. This Agreement and all of the covenants hereof shall inure to
the benefit of and be binding upon the City and the Professional respectively and their agents,
representatives, employee, successors, assigns and legal representatives. Neither the City nor the
Professional shall have the right to assign, transfer or sublet its interest or obligations hereunder
without the written consent of the other party.
44
45
46
Agreement Professional Services Page 11
EXHIBIT A: CONTRACTOR SCOPE OF WORK AND FEE SCHEDULE
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council
FROM:Robert Schober, Capital Asset Project Manager
THROUGH:Nancy Lesley, Director Wheeler Opera House
MEMO DATE:August 17, 2020
MEETING DATE:August 25, 2020
RE:Wheeler Opera House Masonry Scope
REQUEST OF COUNCIL:
Request approval of releasing the masonry restoration scope for the Wheeler Opera
House to Aspen Constructors Inc.
SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND:
Mills and Schnoering Architects was awarded a contract via Resolution #74 on July 8
th,
2019, to design and develop construction drawings for the Wheeler Modernization &
Infrastructure Project.
Aspen Constructors (ACI) was awarded a contract to perform pre-construction services
for the project. The freight elevator modernization scope of the project was released on
January 28th, 2020 via resolution #10-2020, and the remaining structural, mechanical,
plumbing and electrical work was released on March 24th, 2020 via resolution #22-2020.
This work was recently completed in July, 2020.
At a June 8th 2020 Council work session, staff recommended to council that the project
team move forward and accelerate the timeline of the Wheeler Opera House Masonry
restoration scope due to downtime during the Covid-19 pandemic (previously work was
scheduled to start in fall, 2021 with completion in spring, 2022). Direction was provided
to move ahead and complete as much work as possible while the Wheeler is dark.
At a July 27th 2020 Council work session, staff presented Council an update of
construction progress at the Wheeler to date, as well as requests for rent abatement from
the tenants of the businesses operating within the Wheeler due to the current Covid-19
business climate and upcoming masonry project. Council was willing to provide rent
abatements for the business owners through the end of 2020 with the situation to be
evaluated heading into 2021.
55
DISCUSSION:
Staff is requesting approval of releasing the masonry restoration scope in the amount of
one million, five hundred fifty-eight thousand, four hundred ninety-three dollars
($1,558,493) to Aspen Constructors (Exhibit A). The summary of the work to be
performed is as follows:
Mock-ups for approval of exterior masonry and painting restoration
Masonry restoration on all elevations of the building
Paint restoration on the East, Southeast and South elevations of the building
FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
This request would be funded through the Wheeler Opera House fund balance (Fund
120) and would need to be incorporated into the 2020 Fall Supplemental Budget as it is
currently not appropriated. Total project costs are as outlined below:
ACI Masonry Restoration Scope $1,558,493
Masonry Project Soft Costs $186,700
Owners Project Contingency $311,699
Total Funding Request $2,056,892
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council award Aspen Constructors Inc. the masonry restoration scope in the amount of
one million, five hundred fifty-eight thousand, four hundred ninety-three dollars
($1,558,493).
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
56
RESOLUTION #74
(Series of 2020)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER OR ASSITANT CITY MANAGER TO TAKE
SUCH ACTION NECESSARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER.
WHEREAS,pursuant to Resolution #74, Series of 2020, City Council approved the
Contract Change Order in the amount of $1,558,493 a true and accurate copy attached as
Exhibit A,between Aspen Constructors and the City of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the
City of Aspen to approve the Contract pursuant to the terms thereof.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO,
That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby directs the City Manager or Assistant
City Manager to take any and all action necessary to approve the Contract Change Order,
pursuant to the terms thereof.
INTRODUCED,READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on
the 25th, day of August,2020.
Torre,Mayor
I,Nicole Henning,duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing
is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of
Aspen,Colorado,at a meeting held,August 25,2020.
Nicole Henning,City Clerk
57
August 14, 2020
City of Aspen
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
(970) 920-5079
Wheeler Opera House Phase 2
To all it may concern:
Aspen Constructors Incorporated (ACI), is honored to provide a proposal for the Wheeler Opera
House Phase 2. The scope of this phase of the project will comprise the following:
Mock-ups of Exterior Masonry and Painting Restoration
Masonry restoration on all elevations of the building.
Paint restoration on East, Southeast and South elevations of the building.
We appreciate the opportunity to work with the City of Aspen on the upgrade of the Wheeler
Opera House.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Tanguay, President
EXHIBIT A
58
CHANGE ORDER
OWNER CONTRACTOR
ARCHITECT
PROJEC Wheeler Opera House (Phase 1) CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 7
DATE: 8/14/2020
CONTRACTOR: CONTRACT DATE:
ASPEN CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
309 A.A.B.C., SUITE G PROJECT #: 2019-092
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 20-004
Summary of Scope of Work
$1,558,492.94
$1,558,492.94
Estimated Change Amount: $1,558,492.94
*** This is only an estimate and is not considered final projected cost
44,893.96$
$1,127,408.60
1,172,302.56$
$1,558,492.94
2,730,795.50$
Not valid until signed by the Owner and Contractor.
119 Days
12/18/2020
ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR OWNER
ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS
BY BY BY
DATE DATE DATE
Cityo f Aspen Aspen Constructors, Inc.
M+S Architects
Painting and Masonry Restoration of the North, East, Southeast, South, and West elevations of the Wheeler
Opera House per
CHANGE ORDER DESCRIPTION
WOH: Phase 2, per Schedule of Values dated 08.12.2020
309 A.A.B.C. Suite G
The original Estimated Contract Price was.................................................
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders................................................................
The Estimated Contract Price prior to this Change Order was...................
The Estimated Contract Price will be INCREASED by this Change Order in the amount of..............
The new Estimated Contract Price including this Change Order will be....
anticipated may be greater.
The Contract Time is anticipated to be increased by
The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
Aspen Constructors Inc.
Aspen, CO 81611
59
WHEELER OPERA HOUSE (Phase 2) GMP8/12/2020DESCRIPTION OF WORK QUANTITYUNIT OF MEASURETYPE OF COST UNIT COST SUB AMOUNT MATERIALS EQUIPMENT ACI LABORDIVISION 1 GENERAL $136,935.00$17,660.00 $1,000.00 $6,000.00 $112,275.0001-050 Preconstruction01-100 Project ManagerAllowance for part-time Project Manager 2 hours a week to attend OAC and associated job meetings.30 Hours Allowance $95.00$2,850.0001-110 Proejct Engineer01-140 Assistant Project ManagerAllowance for 15 weeks of for a full time Assistant Project Manager for project coordination services at 5 hours per week75 Hours Allowance $75.00$5,625.0001-200 SuperintendentAllowance for a full time superintendent 40 hours per week600 Hours Allowance $130.00$78,000.0001-210 Foreman01-215 Skilled laborAllowance for 1 full time SKILLED laborer for 15 weeks to help with material moving, staging & ongoing site organization600 Hours Allowance $43.00$25,800.0001-220 General Labor/Clean-up01-300 Engineering & Testing01-310 Permits & Fees EXCLUDED BY OWNER01-330 Builders Risk InsuranceINCLUDED BELOW01-340 General Liability InsuranceINCLUDED BELOW01-400 Mobilzation/Demobilization01-410 Jobsite TruckAllowance for ACI dump truck to assist with material transport. $500/Month for 6 months.4 Months Allowance $500.00 $2,000.0001-420 Jobsite Trailer01-430 Temporary ToiletAllowance for 2 temporary toilets cleaned twice a week for 6 months4 Months Allowance $940.00 $3,760.0001-440 Trash Removal Allowance for the removal and transport of trash 15 Weeks Allowance $260.00 $3,900.0001-460 Temporary Utilities01-470 Equipment RentalAllowance for the use Skidster, and excavator to help set jersey barriers and panels. 4 Days Allowance $1,000.00 $4,000.0001-500 Shipping & DeliveryAllowance to ship materials for Sampling, testing and approval.20 Shipments Allowance $100.00 $2,000.0001-510 ReprographicsAllowance for permit set of drawings and construction drawings on site.1 Lump Sum Allowance $500.00 $500.0001-600 SecurityAllowance for the rental of chain link fencing with screen covering, for the duration of the project.- included in 02-500 below01-610 Safety and ProtectoinAllowance for materials needed to comply with COA Covid-19 requirements.1 Lump Sum Allowance $500.00 $500.0001-700 Final CleanAllowance for 5 person cleaning crew for 3 days for window cleaning and final clean.150 Hours Allowance $50.00 $7,500.0001-750 Temporary OfficeAllowance for temporary office supplies, chairs, printer cartridges, paper, pens etc.1 Lump Sum Allowance $500.00 $500.0001-800 Winter ConditionsIncluded in Masonry subcontractor pricing01-825 Parking on Job SitesWHEELER OPERA HOUSE (Phase 2) - PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE OF VALUES***For T&M budgeting only. This does not constitute a bid, proposal or guarantee.SPEC SECTION60
WHEELER OPERA HOUSE (Phase 2) GMP8/12/2020DESCRIPTION OF WORK QUANTITYUNIT OF MEASURETYPE OF COST UNIT COST SUB AMOUNT MATERIALS EQUIPMENT ACI LABORSPEC SECTIONDIVISION 2 SITEWORK$8,298.00$8,298.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0002-100 Asbestos Abatement02-110 Demolition Remove Fence on the south side of parking lot, Light post, refer to 06-100 for labor included in demolition.02-150Tree Removal/Mitigation and Replace. Site work and regradingAllowance for (2) carpenters, 2 hours to remove existing Ash tree only, located on the sidewalk. Permit and mitigation fees by City of Aspen.1 2 Allowance $70.00 $280.0002-200 Surveying & Layout02-210 Radon02-220 Testing & InspectionsAllowance for Miller Safety to make 4 site visits to inspect the scaffolding. 2 visits for initial scaffolding setup inspections, and 2 periodic visits to inspect scaffolding during working hours.4 Lump Sum Allowance $800.00 $3,200.0002-300 Sitework02-310 Dewatering02-320 Soil Treatment02-400 Wells02-500Fencing/Temp Fencing/BarricadeAllowance for materials that include temp fencing for $4,818.00. Barricades $23,852.20 for construction site and side walk during construction was paid for in Phase 1, 8.3.201 Lump Sum Allowance $4,818.00 $4,818.0002-600 Sound blanketsIncluded in Line Items #04-300 and #04-400 (MASONRY DIVISION 4)02-700 Paving02-900 Landscaping02-955 Site ProtectionAllowance for protection of existing finishes in areas affected by construction. refer to 06-150 for materials and 06-100 for labor to install protection.6800 Sqft Allowance $0.00$0.00DIVISION 3 CONCRETE$0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0003-100 Concrete Cutting03-400 Concrete Driveways
61
WHEELER OPERA HOUSE (Phase 2) GMP8/12/2020DESCRIPTION OF WORK QUANTITYUNIT OF MEASURETYPE OF COST UNIT COST SUB AMOUNT MATERIALS EQUIPMENT ACI LABORSPEC SECTIONDIVISION 4 MASONRY$1,025,686.83$1,025,686.83 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0004-300 Masonry & Cleaning Mockup1. Removal of existing stone units for confirmation of original anchoring method and review of new anchoring. 1A. Newly fabricated stone matching orignal color, texture, composition, orginal profile, and fastening is to be installed where indicated. 1B. New stone is to be installed in wall with the same bedding plane orientation. 1C. Provide pointing mortar mockup. 2. Microabrasive mockup for paint removal at stone window surrounds where indicated. 3.One masonry retooling sample where indicated to be done in place. Ref. (A-3.0, A-3.1).1 Lump Sum Allowance$20,590.00$20,590.0004-400 Masonry Provide new full stone units to match existing compostion, color, texture and profile. Ref (E1/A-3.0, A-3.1) Provide dutchman repairs Ref (E2/A-3.0, A-3.1) Strip existing paint from all stone surfaces and apply new breathable mineral coating. Ref (E3/A-3.0, A-3.1) Reset existing slipped keystones, Ref (E7/A-3.0, A-3.1) Repoint existing brick masonry, replace brick Ref (E10/A-3.0, A-3.2) Clean base of sandstone with microabrasive, Ref (E12/A-3.0, A-3.1, A-3.2). UPDATED CONTRACTOR PROPOSAL FROM SUMMIT SEALANTS 7.22.201 Lump Sum Allowance $973,648.00 $973,648.0004-500 Masonry Bond/WarrantyAllowance of 3.23% for the bonding of all masonry work. ($973,648.00 x 3.23% = $31,448.83) 1 Lump Sum Allowance $31,448.83 $31,448.83DIVISION 5 METALS$2,000.00$2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0005-100 Cranes/HoistingAllowance for the use of a crane service to pick the sections of railing off the roof, and to lift railings into place once the railings have been painted.2 days Allowance $1,000.00 $2,000.0005-200 Structural SteelDIVISION 6 WOOD & PLASTICS$21,800.00$0.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 $16,800.0006-100 LaborCMP installation and compliance with OAC guidlines. Allowance for 1. (2) carpenters, 1 week for initial barrier setup, scaffolding setup, and fabrication of wood barriers to enclose workspace. 2. (2) carpenters 1 week to move barriers to east side of building, and to fabricate entry's and wood barriers for the area around Mia's gallery. Also removal and installation of existing awnings. 3. (2) carpenters 1 week to move barriers to south side and to fabricate wood barriers to enclose work space. Also removal and installation of existing awning.240 Hours Allowance $70.00$16,800.0006-150 Materials Allaowance for misc. materials used throughout the project. 1 Lump Sum Allowance $5,000.00 $5,000.00
62
WHEELER OPERA HOUSE (Phase 2) GMP8/12/2020DESCRIPTION OF WORK QUANTITYUNIT OF MEASURETYPE OF COST UNIT COST SUB AMOUNT MATERIALS EQUIPMENT ACI LABORSPEC SECTIONDIVISION 7THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION$9,225.00$9,225.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0007-600 Flashing and Sheet MetalRemove and reinstall metal coping flashing and railings, E11/A-3.3, D2/A-3.3 (Proposal form GZO)1 Lump Sum Allowance $9,225.00$9,225.00DIVISION 8 DOORS & WINDOWS $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0008-100 Interior Doors08-200 Exterior Doors08-300 Loading Dock Door08-400 Entry Doors08-500 Windows08-600 Skylights08-700 Hardware08-800 Mirrors & Glazing08-900 Glass Shower DoorsDIVISION 9 FINISHES $129,160.00$129,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0009-100 Stucco 09-200 Drywall & Plaster09-250 Samples09-300 Tile & Stone09-400 Wood Flooring09-500 Carpet09-600 Epoxy Flooring09-650 Resilient Flooring09-800 Acoustical Treatment09-900Painting and Cleaning Mockup4. Prepand paint metal cornice in mockup area prep cornice only, full stripping not required. 5. Wood window trim mockups to include: 5A. Gel stripper for stripping paint from wood trim only. 5B. Epoxy repairs to wood trim only. 5C. Prep and new paint for sash and wood trim. Ref. (A-3.0, A-3.1)1 Lump Sum Allowance $7,800.00 $7,800.0009-950 Painting and CleaningPrep and repaint existing metal cornice to match existing colors, full stripping of cornice not required, Ref (E4/A-3.0, A3.1) Provide expoxy repairs at all wood window trim above first floor, Ref (E5/A-3.0, A-3.1) Prep and paint all exterior wood window sash and trim above first floor Ref (E6/A-3.0, A-3.1) Painting of roof parapet railing: (2) painters for 1 day. (2*8)*$85.00 = $1,360.001 Lump Sum Allowance $120,000.00$121,360.00DIVISION 10 SPECIALTIES $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0010-500 Specialties
63
WHEELER OPERA HOUSE (Phase 2) GMP8/12/2020DESCRIPTION OF WORK QUANTITYUNIT OF MEASURETYPE OF COST UNIT COST SUB AMOUNT MATERIALS EQUIPMENT ACI LABORSPEC SECTIONDIVISION 11 EQUIPMENT $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0011-100 Appliances 11-500 Specialty EquipmentDIVISION 12 FURNISHINGS$0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0012-100 Window Coverings12-500 Specialty FurnishingsDIVISION 13 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION$0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0013-600 Solar13-700 Security & Alarm SystemsDIVISION 14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS$0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0014-200 Elevators14-800 ScaffoldingDIVISION 15 MECHANICAL$0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0015-300 Fire Protection15-400 Plumbing15-600 Refrigeration15-700 HVAC15-900 Test & Balance DIVISION 16 ELECTRICAL$0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.0016-100 Electrical-120/240 Volt16-400 Audio Visual(subcontract)(materials)(equipment) (ACI labor)Subtotal Division 1 through 16:$1,333,104.83 $1,192,029.83 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $129,075.00 Sub Contingency - 4% of Subtotal:$47,681.19 ACI Contingency- 4% of ACI (Materials, Equipment.,& Labor)$5,643.00 Contractor Fee - 8.5% of Subs/ Material/ Equipment:$102,342.54$101,322.54 $510.00 $510.00 $0.00General Liability Insurance - 1.5% of Subs/ Material/ Equipment/ ACI:$19,996.57$17,880.45 $90.00 $90.00 $1,936.13Builders Risk Insurance - 0.5% of Subs/ Material/ Equipment/ ACI:$6,665.52$5,960.15 $30.00 $30.00 $645.38Bond - 3.23% of Subs/ Material/ Equipment/ ACI:$43,059.29$38,502.56 $193.80 $193.80 $4,169.12 Project TOTAL$1,558,492.94 64
1
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM: Steve Hunter, PE, PH, Utility Resource Manager
THROUGH:Tyler Christoff, PE, Director of Utilities
MEMO DATE:08/24/2020
MEETING DATE:08/25/2020
RE:Resolution # 77 (Series of 2020) Stage Two Water Shortage
REQUEST OF COUNCIL: City Council is requested to consider adoption of Resolution # 77 (Series
of 2020) declaring that Stage Two Water Shortage conditions exist in Aspen, Colorado.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:The City adopted its water shortage policy through an Ordinance
of the Municipal Code. On July 14, 2020, via resolution #61, Council declared a Stage One Water
Shortage. The City is currently under Stage One restrictions as imposed by the City Manager
through an Administrative Order.
SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND: City staff continuously monitor numerous drought indicators
to proactively predict and address water shortages within the community. Drought conditions
have deteriorated over the past several months. Based on data and observations staff
recommends declaration of a Stage Two Water Shortage.
DISCUSSION:The Water Shortage Ordinance in Section 25.28.010 sets forth the process for
finding of a water shortage. A finding of water shortage is made by a City Council Resolution,
which will declare the appropriate Stage. Further, Section 25.28.010(c) states, “The duration
of each stage and the restrictions to be imposed shall be decided by the City Council and
included in the resolution finding the water shortage, according to the exigencies of the
particular situation in question.”
Current Drought Conditions
Drought Indicators:As of August 18, 2020, the US Drought Monitor elevated Aspen and Pitkin
County from severe drought (D2) to extreme drought conditions (D3) county wide. Above
normal temperatures and below normal precipitation have led to these conditions. Aspen
(denoted by a star in Figure 1) showing extreme drought conditions that have continued to
move north and east. Staff will continue to review the US drought monitor reporting to align
local water conservation efforts to State and regional actions.
65
2
Figure 1 US Drought Monitor: Colorado 8-18-2020
Figure 2. Three-Month Temperature & Precipitation Probability Outlook for September, October, November 2020.
Streamflow Forecast: Streamflows in the Roaring Fork watershed are currently at 40-70% of
median.Flows have continued to decline this summer,and some are at or near 2018 levels.
66
3
Stage Two Water Shortage Mandatory Restrictions
The Water Shortage Ordinance provides for escalating restrictions based on the Stage of drought
observed. A Stage Two Water Shortage is designed to incur a 15-20% reduction in water use. Staff
recommends the following mandatory restrictions be implemented immediately:
1. Watering of any lawn, garden, landscaped area, tree, shrub or other plantshall be prohibited
from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Additionally limits from Stage One (e.g., odd-even watering
schedule) will move from voluntary to mandatory. An "odd-even" schedule means that
addresses ending in odd numbers and addresses ending in even numbers will water on
alternate days, with odd numbers only irrigating on odd-numbered days and even numbers
only irrigating on even-numbered days.
2. There shall be no washing of sidewalks, driveways, parking areas, tennis courts, patios, or
other paved areas.
3. There shall be no refilling of swimming pools with water furnished by the City.
4. There shall be no noncommercial washing of privately owned cars, other motor vehicles,
trailers or boats, except from a bucket and except that a hose equipped with a positive shut-
off nozzle.
5. No new public or private landscaping installations shall be allowed with the exception of that
required as a minimum for erosion control of disturbed surfaces as determined by the City.
6. No new water connections shall be authorized; however, existing authorizations shall be
honored.
Upon implementation of a Stage Two Water Shortage declaration staff will implement an
education and outreach campaign to alert and educate the community of targeted water
reduction and use restrictions. Efforts will include social media outreach, printed advertisement,
press releases, customer billing inserts, and the City’s drought information website.
Violations will be handled with a multi-faceted response. Staff will rely on an education campaign
before moving to a progressive enforcement of penalties spelled out in section 25.28.040 of City
Code. Enforcement of these mandatory restrictions includes:
1. Written notification of violation and requested correction provided to Property owner or
Agent;
2. If the correction requested in the written notification of violation is not corrected, a first
offense may be issued with a $500 fine;
3. An observed blatant violation of restrictions may result in a $500 fine upon first offense;
4. Subsequent offenses may result in additional $1500 fine(s), disconnection of water
service and may be penalized in accordance with Section 1.04.080 of the Municipal Code.
67
4
Stage Two Water Shortage Temporary Rates
To encourage a 15-20% reduction in water use, the City Manager may implement temporary rate
increases. Staff recommends that surcharges be added to Tier 3 and Tier 4 water rates to
encourage efficient use of water for large water users. These proposed temporary surcharges are
shown in Table 1, below.
Table 1: Proposed Stage Two Water Shortage Surcharges
2020
RATE
STAGE TWO WATER
SHORTAGE % SURCHARGE
DROUGHT
RATES
WATER VARIABLE RATE
BILLING AREA 1- 4 TIER RATE STRUCTURE
Tier 1 $2.95 0.00%$2.95
Tier 2 $3.79 0.00%$3.79
Tier 3 $5.43 50.00%$8.15
Tier 4 $8.14 75.00%$14.25
BUTTERMILK METRO DISTRICT – 2 TIER
STRUCTURE
Tier 1 $4.58 0.00%$4.58
Tier 2 $10.73 62.50%$17.43
FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: If watering restrictions are implemented revenue projections are
expected to decline; however, these mightbe offset to some extent by higher rate structures for
Tier 3 and Tier 4 for metered water customers and a higher demand rate for unmetered water
users for whom meters are not feasible. (Unmetered users will pay a higher rate upon
determination of a shortage).
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Without a city-wide reduction in typical water usage, agricultural
activities, recreational activities and fish and wildlife habitat along the Maroon, Castle, Roaring
Fork and Colorado Rivers will be more negatively impacted than if there was a reduction in typical
water usage. Public safety concerns resulting in increased fire and flood hazards, as well as
negative economic impacts due to decreased tourism, are also expected to occur if drought
conditions persist.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends enacting a Stage Two Water Shortage based on
extreme drought conditions in Aspen and the Roaring Fork Watershed.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
68
5
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A:Resolution # 77 (Series of 2020)
69
RESOLUTION # 77
(Series of 2020)
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT A STAGE TWO WATER SHORTAGE
CONDITION EXISTS IN ASPEN, COLORADO, AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT ADMINSTRATIVE ORDERS SETTING
FORTH MANDATORY WATER USE CONTROLS TO REMAIN IN EFFECT
DURING THIS CONDITION.
WHEREAS, Pitkin County is currently experiencing “extreme” drought
conditions as determined by the U.S. Drought Monitor; and
WHEREAS, the National Weather Service forecasts continued above
normal temperatures and below average precipitation; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen has established procedures to guard against
potential shortages in its water supplies pursuant to Municipal Code Section
25.28.020; and
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen wishes to encourage its residents and water
customers to conserve available water supplies through temporary adjustment in
water rates.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby declares that a Stage Two
water shortage condition exists in the City of Aspen, Colorado. It is further
resolved by the City Council that the temporary water rates contained in Section
25.28.40 of the Municipal Code will be in effect for the duration of the water
shortage declaration.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Aspen on the 25th day of August 2020.
Torre, Mayor
I, Nicole Henning, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the
foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City
Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held, August 25, 2020.
70
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
71
1
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 11, 2020
At 5:00 p.m. Mayor Torre called the regular meeting to order with Councilmembers Richards, Mesirow,
Mullins and Hauenstein joining via video conference.
SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCE:Rich Englehart, Interim Airport Director
Mr. Englehart said this past week, there was a meeting with the board of directors’ recently and there
will be a meeting this Thursday, as a :rolling meeting” with public comment, and we are offering a sign
up on the Pitkin county website. We are encouraging as much input as we possibly can. People are
welcome to come, but only a limited number are allowed to be in person.
Councilwoman Richards said the airport couldn’t be in better hands and asked where the viewing public
could find documents. Mr. Englehart directed folks to www.pitkincounty.com/signup and said all of the
information is there, including a full report, addendums, etc.
Councilman Mesirow mentioned the huge reduction in traffic and how those systemic changes are being
worked into this process and asked if those things are being considered to alter the path we were on
previously. Mr. Englehart said they’ve taken a look and are anticipating a dip for a four-year path. The
project has definitely been kicked out for at least two years. This may be an 11-year project now. It’s
changed the timeframe.
CITIZEN COMMENTS:None.
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Councilman Hauenstein said you can’t go anywhere without face coverings anymore and we’re all in this
together. We all wish we had a playbook, but we’re writing as we go.
Councilman Mesirow said the valley is rallying behind public health. We are all being each other’s
keepers in a more comprehensive way. We need to be proactively thinking about the winter and
mountain constraints. He is eager to get these conversations rolling.
Councilwoman Mullins said they finished the final review of the arts and nonprofit grants. It’s a fun thing
to be able to do during a trying time. She doesn’t know what the next round is going to look like. There
won’t be much relaxing but digging in more.
Mayor Torre said we’ve all received a stark reminder about fire safety. There is a lot of acreage being
burned currently in Glenwood Springs. The hot and dry conditions outside with a little breeze is perfect
for wildfire. We need to be vigilant and observe all fire restrictions. He wished all the best to Glenwood
and the surrounding areas. This community has done a great job dealing with the pandemic. He wants
to remind businesses and visitors that we are in this together. You can see some places doing it well and
examples of places getting lax. Continue your vigilance. We have to work together in the spirit of
fairness. This is a call out to the community to do your part.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
Sara Ott said the health protection team that the city developed is up and running. She is still seeking
applicants. Mike Sear is a recent hire and is a citizen academy graduate, who also has a lot of retail
experience here in Aspen. ACRA is moving forward well with the street team and have made a lot of
72
2
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 11, 2020
contact on masks. The APD has had contact with over 4000 individuals so far. They are seeing 90-95%
compliance at this time, which is a big success. There is still additional signage and resources going out
and we are purchasing furniture to compliment what we already have downtown. We are looking to
future and are focused on two main areas: strategic testing and the ski season and what the state’s role
is. The governor took swift actions effecting our ski season initially, but we are looking at whether local
public health agencies can have these controls moving forward. We will be digging into this later this
week and will be coordinating with our partners at the county. We need to know expectations. Staff is
currently working on a virtual town hall conversation. We want to know what the business experience
has been like so far this summer and what do they see as the opportunity and challenges as we move
into winter. We are putting this together to work closely with everyone and will have a listening session.
We need to get a sense of how people are feeling before the next big push.
BOARD REPORTS:
Councilwoman Mullins said there will be a RFTA meeting on Thursday and a CAST meeting regarding ski
areas, as well as a Reudi Water and Power Authority meeting coming up.
Councilman Hauenstein said there is a CCLC meeting coming up focused on the Saturday market for the
most part. Our is looking better than other towns who’ve had to shut down their markets recently. Hats
off to Mitch and CCLC with some hard-working members.
Mayor Torre said we don’t have the manpower to run another block of vendors right now for the
market, but maybe CCLC should think about virtual marketplace. This may be another opportunity to
discuss some other ideas. Councilman Hauenstein said the will is there will CCLC and there has been
some uptick in positive tests recently, which is working against us but the will is there. Councilman
Mesirow said it seems to him that we have a huge challenge going into the winter going from outdoor to
indoor environments. We need to find tools to increase people or we need to find ways to provide
outdoor space in the winter. He said he’s already heard a few ideas and possibly a winter market taking
over Wagner Park. We need to encourage these conversations and start soon and creatively.
Councilwoman Richards said that in thinking about the winter, years ago, there was an event at the ARC
with a large fundraiser. There was a large tent in Wagner park where a band played. We need to think
about these ideas for this winter. She’s open to taking a look at these opportunities.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Councilman Mesirow pulled resolution #068 and Mayor Torre pulled #051 and #063.
Mayor Torre asked Tyler Christoff about resolution#051, and Mr. Christoff explained the resolution
numbers as contracts, vendors and acceptance of a grant. Jim True said they were a part of the packet
and all can be approved. Councilman Hauenstein said he supports this. Mayor Torre said it’s a large
project, and he’s lucky to get some funding resources. This seems to be a total package here. He asked if
there will be further annual costs and Mr. Christoff said yes, but relatively minor. There will be software
costs as well. Councilwoman Mullins asked about a completion date and Mr. Christoff said it will run
from November 2020 through November 2021. Councilwoman Mullins said she is very supportive.
Regarding resolution #063, Mayor Torre asked about design elements, but looking through this contract,
he didn’t really see this represented again. He’s wondering if all of this is still in place with the vendor.
73
3
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 11, 2020
Chris Everson said all of those elements are part of the site-builtcomponents for the building and will be
included in the general contractor’s scope of work. Councilman Hauenstein said he is still interested in
doing a site visit. He hasn’t ruled out a road trip to Boise. Councilman Mesirow said we are choosing the
best option and most affordable. Councilwoman Mullins said she is fascinated by this and asked if our
city staff been to any completed projects by these people. Mr. Everson said he has been to the factory
and has seen their quality control process. He’s only seen pictures of projects butgoing to the plant and
seeing the work that occurs and how each module moves from station to station, and how the quality
assurance happens as it goes, is really fascinating. Councilwoman Richards said this type of construction
modular are faster and quicker. We drilled down on the noise transmission and she is comfortable with
the contract.
Regarding resolution #068, Councilman Mesirow said there is a huge hunger from a lot of expert
individuals on this project. This next phase in talking to Sara and Chris, is the time when these ideas can
best filter in. Councilwoman Richards said she wants to go forward with what we have on the table
tonight. She doesn’t want to start over on this. There are some opportunities for what Skippy is talking
about regarding the lumberyard and other projects. She spoke about the design competition with Mayor
Klanderud at the time for the Burlingame project.
Councilwoman Mullins said she is supportive.
Mayor Torre said he has one concern regarding the parameters of what DHM will present after public
input because they may be limiting the creative nature. He’s hopeful, however.
Mr. Everson said this contract is designed to take council comments provided on July 6
th in the work
session as a jumping off point and then get community feedback based on those comments.
Mayor Torre asked if this was put out to bid and Scott Miller said this was part of an RFP process when
DHM was originally selected for this and there has been some aggressive public input on this.
Councilwoman Mullins motioned to approve the consent calendar, Councilman Mesirow seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. All in favor, motion
carried.
FIRST READING – ORDINANCE #10, SERIES OF 2020 – Water Shortages Code
Steve Hunter, Utility Resource Manager, said staff is seeking approval for Ordinance #10. Council saw
this in draft format at the July 13th work session. This provides staff with a strategic plan for drought and
water shortages.
Councilwoman Mullins motioned to read, Councilman Hauenstein seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. All in favor, motion
carried.
City Clerk, Nicole Henning read the ordinance.
Mr. Hunter gave a little history on this as compared to 2018. Councilwoman Mullins encouraged stricter
water restrictions if necessary.
Councilwoman Richards motioned to approve; Councilwoman Mullins seconded.
74
4
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 11, 2020
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. All in favor, motion
carried.
ACTION ITEMS – Resolution #067, Series of 2020 - Extension of Silver Circle Temporary Use Continuation
Councilman Hauensteinmotioned to continue to August 25th, 2020, Councilwoman Mullins seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. All in favor, motion
carried.
ISIS Theater Building Debt Service –
Pete Strecker said he is looking for direction with how to proceed. Last we spoke together; it was around
the aspect of Aspen Film renewing an extension of their operating lease with Metropolitan Film. The
theatre doors are not open yet and they are having some difficulty making lease payments at this time.
The debt obligation is due on September 1
st, and we would take the existing balance of $49,000 and
would use 80,000 from general fund to make the debt payment. Council could approve a short-term
loan.
Councilwoman Richards said she believes it was discussed that the note itself might be potentially re-
financeable at a lower rate and asked if that is still in the works and Mr. Strecker said yes, and that it has
taken time to get some additional bank bids. We do have a very viable bid at this point in time, which
would enable us to move forward and save some money. Councilwoman Richards said it’s far too great
an asset to let go of, and she supports staff’s recommendation. She said that every cultural institution in
our country is suffering right now and we need to step up.
Councilman Hauenstein said what an asset the Isis is and that it is his responsibility to ask some
questions. The Isis group sold a couple of commercial units and he asked where the funds have gone.
He also asked if the Metropolitan has made any payments thus far and what the guarantee is that we
get paid back. Mr. Strecker said the payments for the retail spaces, there was a separate transaction
with the buyer and the Isis retail group for market value and they had to pay off the remaining debt
placed on that property and the city was reimbursed. There is a question of how we want this repaid if
it’s a loan or a grant and that is up to council at this point. There is no absolute or guarantees at this
point. We can always make modifications to the lease for payback as well. Susan Wrubel said that
Metropolitan has not paid anything so far since the theater has not been allowed to open.
Councilwoman Mullins said she is supportive of putting the money forward from the general fund and
supportive of the refinance and hopes we can open up the Isis sooner than later.
Mayor Torre summed up that we support using the 80k from the general fund and we do also support
the refinance. At this time, we are looking to modify the sublease for a deferral period of two years for
the 80k as direction for Mr. Strecker to move forward with.
Resolution #070, Series of 2020 – IGA for Inspection Services
Mayor Torre and Phillip Supino both voiced their pleasure at seeing Stephen Kanipe back in the fold.
Mr. Kanipe said this is an agreement between the town of Snowmass Village and the town of Basalt and
we have a lot in common with them. We all need this mutual aid when we are in these times of
75
5
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 11, 2020
uncertainty. We may be able to turn this into a more efficient and effective way to do inspections as we
have been crazy busy lately with 30 to 40 inspections a day.
Councilman Hauensteinmotioned to adopt resolution #070, Councilwoman Mullins seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. All in favor, motion
carried.
Ms. Ott asked to give an update on the Grizzly Creek fire. She said the fire has grown today and is at 0%
containment and jumped the Colorado river today and is now on the south side. There are evacuations
happening at No Name and Bear Ranch. We are in touch with Glenwood partners to provide remote
help and I-70 is closed until further notice. Glenwood has also changed their water source to the Roaring
Fork River due to concerns over contamination.
Councilwoman Richards motioned to adjourn; Councilman Mesirow seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. All in favor, motion
carried.
______________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
76
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council
THROUGH: Phillip Supino, Community Development Director
FROM: Sarah Yoon, Preservation Planner; Community Development
MEMO DATE: August 17, 2020
MEETING DATE: August 25, 2020
RE: Call Up Notice, HPC approval for 110 Neale Ave. – Conceptual Major Development
APPLICANT:
17 Queen LLC
REPRESENTATIVE:
Forum Phi Architecture LLC
LOCATION:
Street Address:
110 Neale Avenue
Legal Description:
Lot 2, As shown on the
Subdivision Exemption Plat
of 114 Neale/17 Queen
Historic Lot Split, City and
Townsite of Aspen,
Colorado
Parcel Identification:
PID# 2737-073-83-002
CURRENT ZONING &
USE:
R-15A (Moderate-Density
Residential); Residential
Use
PROPOSED USE:
No change
PROCESS SUMMARY: Certain land use approvals granted by HPC or
P&Z require that Council be notified of the decision through a brief staff
summary. The notification is not a public hearing and no applicant
presentation or public comment has been accepted in the past. During
the Call Up Notice, City Council may uphold the HPC or P&Z decision.
Alternatively, Council may request more detailed information be provided
through a presentation by staff and the applicant at a future meeting.
After hearing the additional project description, Council may uphold the
boards’ decision or may remand it to require reconsideration of specific
issues at a new public hearing. HPC’s or P&Z’s decision on remand shall
be final.
BACKGROUND: 110 Neale Avenue is a 15,160 sf lot created through a
Historic Landmark Lot Split in 1998 that does not contain the historic
resource. The single-family home on the lot today received HPC design
review approval in 2005. Pursuant to Section 26.415.110.A, all parcels
created through the Historic Landmark Lot Split process retain
designation status and is subject to HPC design review.
Site Locator Map – 110 Neale Avenue
110
77
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The design proposal to remodel the non-historic single-family home by reconfiguring the building footprint
and making changes to the mass and form was reviewed by HPC on June 24, 2020. During this first
hearing for Conceptual Major Development, the applicant was given direction by HPC to restudy the mass
and scale of a specific area visible from Neale Avenue. Following the HPC meeting, the applicant worked
with staff to revise the design prior to the second hearing.
On July 22nd HPC approved the proposal with conditions for Conceptual Major Development by a 5-0 vote.
Approval was granted to remodel the existing home resulting in exterior changes to the building footprint,
massing, and materials. The project is also subject to Residential Design Standards (RDS). The approved
design meets the historic preservation design guidelines for detached structures and the residential design
standards, as proposed. No historic preservation benefits were requested for this proposal at this time.
The conditions of approval focus on comments provided by other relevant City Departments and the
standard requirement to submit for Final Development Review within one year of Conceptual approval.
Staff recommends Council uphold HPC’s decision.
Figure 1 – Existing Northwest Elevation (from Neale Avenue)
Figure 2 – Approved Northwest Elevation (Neale Avenue)
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council uphold HPC’s decision.
Recommended Motion for Call-up
“I move to call-up HPC’s approval for 110 Neale Avenue – Conceptual Major Development.”
78
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________.
EXHIBITS:
A – HPC memo, July 22, 2020
B – HPC approved plans
C – Draft HPC meeting minutes, July 22, 2020
D – Draft HPC Resolution #15, Series of 2020
79
Page 1 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
Memorandum
TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner
THROUGH: Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer
MEETING DATE: July 22, 2020
RE: 110 Neale Avenue – Conceptual Major Development Review,
PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM JUNE 24TH
APPLICANT /OWNER:
17 Queen LLC
REPRESENTATIVE:
Forum Phi Architecture, LLC
LOCATION:
Street Address:
110 Neale Avenue
Legal Description:
Lot 2, As shown on the
Subdivision Exemption Plat of
114 Neale/17 Queen Historic
Lot Split, City and Townsite of
Aspen, Colorado
Parcel Identification Number:
PID# 2737-073-83-002
CURRENT ZONING & USE
R-15A (Moderate-Density
Residential); Residential Use
PROPOSED USE:
No change
SUMMARY: In June, HPC reviewed an application for Conceptual Major
Development and recommended the applicant restudy the mass and
scale of the proposed cross-gable roof form. The revised design takes
this comment into consideration by reducing the overall height of this
feature. The applicant requests approval for Conceptual Major
Development to remodel the existing home on a lot created through a
historic landmark lot split. Changes to building mass, footprint, and
exterior building materials are proposed. This project is subject to
Residential Design Standards (RDS), to be reviewed and approved by
staff unless the application includes variances. The revised design
meets the required RDS standards and no further action by HPC is
needed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the project and recommends approval with conditions
listed on page 4 of this memo.
Site Locator Map – 110 Neale Avenue
110
80
Page 2 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
BACKGROUND:
110 Neale Avenue is a 15,160 sf lot created
through a Historic Landmark Lot Split in 1998
(Ordinance #16, Series of 1998). The historic
miner’s cabin is located on Lot 1 (114 Neale
Avenue), and a new single-family residential
building was approved on Lot 2 (110 Neale
Avenue) in 2005. This structure is considered
an existing non-conforming structure when it
comes to the subgrade level and the floor area.
The property faces both Neale Avenue and
Queen Street. There is an existing detached
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on the site that
is approximately 500 sf. The applicant will
engage in an administrative process to remove
the deed restricted ADU (Reception # 490883)
and provide cash-in-lieu mitigation to be used
by the City in the construction of affordable
housing in another location.
REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals:
• Major Development (Section 26.415.070.D) to remodel the existing non-historic single-
family home. Changes to massing, footprint and exterior building materials are proposed.
The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority, however, this project is
subject to Call-up Notice by City Council.
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The applicant proposes to remodel the existing single-family home by reconfiguring the building
footprint, specifically around the garage and detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), and the
building form/mass as perceived from Neale Avenue. Changes are proposed to the entry features,
exterior building materials and fenestration, with the exception of the gable roofed structure
closest to the historic resource on 114 Neale Avenue. New decks and a larger subgrade level are
proposed with this design.
STAFF COMMENTS:
As an existing detached non-historic structure on a steep slope, staff recognizes the site
conditions make it difficult to create a strong visual relationship between the two properties. Staff
supports the proposed changes related to the reconfiguration of the garage and finds the design
changes made to the entry allows for better compliance with the Residential Design Standards.
In response to HPC comments from the last hearing, the applicant has reduced the height of the
proposed cross-gable form north of the proposed hip gabled feature, which breaks up the massing
and reduces the overall scale of the addition as perceived from the northwest elevation. Staff
recommends approval of the project with the revised design.
Figure 1 – 110 Neale, 2020
81
Page 3 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
Mass & Scale: A level of design compatibility between the new building and the historic
structure is required but there is more flexibility when it comes to detached structures.
The uphill portion of the home closest to the adjacent historic property was originally
designed to be similar in mass and scale to the historic cabin. This part of the house is left
unaltered in this project. As the building moves further away from the historic resource,
the massing of the home begins to respond to the context of Queen Street. The design
presented in June created an imposing cross-gable spanning over most of the living area.
From Neale Avenue, this design read as an uninterrupted singular mass of increased scale
unrelated to the historic resource (Figure 1).
The revised design reduces the roof mass at the center of the structure. (Figure 2). This
design change creates a more appropriately scaled transition connecting the side of the
home that relates to the historic resource with the side of the house that relates to Queen
Street. Staff finds the revised design meets Design Guideline 11.3 which calls for a
new building to appear similar in scale and proportion to the historic building.
Figure 1 – Proposed Northwest Elevation as presented in June (View from Neale Avenue)
Figure 2 – Revised Northwest Elevation (View from Neale Avenue)
82
Page 4 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
The application was referred out to other City departments who have requirements that will
significantly affect the permit review. Please see Exhibit B for full comments.
Engineering Department:
1. Existing 2-hour parking space on Queen Street needs to remain and Engineering supports
a head in parking configuration. Associated details including curb and gutter, landscape
buffer, and sidewalk need to meet requirements.
2. Drywells need to meet today’s standards.
3. Clarify and update utility and water service lines.
4. Easement required for new transformer with appropriate clearances.
Zoning Department:
1. Any new subgrade area expansion must be clearly shown and conform with the maximum
depth of 15’, including lightwells.
2. Clarify easement and slopes reduction impacts to floor area calculations.
3. Clarify deck exemption calculations.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) approve this application with the
following conditions:
1.) Continue to work with all relevant City Departments including Engineering, Parks, and
Zoning to ensure all requirements are met, including but not limited to the proposed right-
of-way configuration.
2.) A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1)
year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an
application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual
Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and
for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual
Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for
extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution #____, Series of 2020
Exhibit A.1 – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria / Staff Findings
Exhibit A.2 – Residential Design Standards (RDS) / Administrative Approval
Exhibit B – Referral Comments
Exhibit C – Revised Application
83
forumphi.com | p. 970.279.4109 | f. 866.770.5585
Aspen: 715 W. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611
Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621
Forum Phi Architecture
715 W Main Street,
Aspen CO 81611
July 8, 2020
Dear Members of the Historic Preservation Commission,
On May 5, 2020, Forum Phi submitted an application for Major Development Review of an addition to the existing
residence at 110 Neale Avenue in Aspen. On June 24, 2020, members of the HPC voted to continue Conceptual
Review of the application pending restudy of the roof massing over the dining room. Specifically, the Commission
argued that the proposed addition did not comply with Section 11.3 of the HPC Design Guidelines.
Section 11.3, under the Mass and Scale heading, requires that new buildings, or in this case additions to existing
buildings, “appear similar in scale and proportion with the historic buildings on a parcel.” The commission argued
that the continuation of the ridge from the living room through the dining room created a massing condition that
was incompatible with the historic resource at 114 Neale, regardless of how that mass might be modulated
through depth. The elevation below identifies the area of concern.
Forum Phi has redeveloped the roof massing in this zone to limit the ridge height and to further modulate the
Neale Avenue elevation. Instead of continuing the ridge height across the living spaces, the design reconsiders
the dining room as a connecting element between the master bedroom wing nearest to the historic resource and
the living wing on the downhill side of the lot.
84
forumphi.com | p. 970.279.4109 | f. 866.770.5585
Aspen: 715 W. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611
Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621
The proposed design has been considered in accordance with applicable Residential Design Standards. These
standards serve as a guide for design within our context, encouraging design at a human scale, requiring
consideration of appropriate building materials, and promoting a healthy relationship between building and street.
The change in roof massing has not resulted in any changes to the way the design addresses RDS requirements.
Significant (but not historic) landscape improvements exist on the site. The project will to the greatest extent
practicable retain all trees on the site and does not propose to remove any trees between the house at 110 Neale
and the historic resource at 114 Neale or between the house at 110 Neale and Neale Avenue.
Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to addressing your comments.
Best regards,
Kurt Peterson,
Project Manager
85
7910OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEDYHWVWVWVDDDEGEGEIIOSWOSWXXXXXXD2.
0
'17.1'2
1
.
6
'4.6'1
0
.
4
'16.6'8.
1
'0.7'5.
3
'0.7'4.
0
'1.6'2
7
.
6
'19.8'2
1
.
2
'22.3'2
1
.
5
'4.8'9.
2
'4.6'1
8
.
4
'11.3'8.
2
'1.5'1
0
.
3
'10.3'1.
6
'3.7'1
0
.
5
'20.5'1
4
.
5
'2.0'7.
2
'14.5'2.
0
'4.2'1
3
.
1
'22.4'1
3
.
1
'7.8'9.
6
'13.1'9.
6
'1.5'14.5'2
0
.
3
'23'10.9'N 39°14'20" E 96.58'
N
3
7
°
2
6
'
5
1
"
E
6
2
.
0
9
'S 50°20'03" E84.49'S
3
0
°
1
7
'
0
0
"
W
16
1
.
1
7
'N 50°07'30" W107.64'BOULDER(TYP.)WI
N
D
OWWE
L
L
CONCRETEPATIOCONCRETEPATIOSTEPSS
T
O
N
E
W
A
L
L
(
T
Y
P
.
)SPAUPPER LEVELCONCRETEDECKWINDOWWELLBOULDERWALL (TYP.)BELOWELEC.TRANS.TELE.PED.ELEC.METERSSTORM DRAINRIM 7901.64'INV 7898.14'BOTT 7887.75'#5 REBAR - TBMEL=7903.71'WATERSERVICE(TYP.)SIGN(TYP.)FIREHYD.WATERVALVE (TYP.)STORMDRAIN (TYP.)CONCRETEDRIVEWAYFLAGSTONEWALKGASMETERGASMETER0.40' STONEFASCIA (TYP.)0.40' STONEFASCIA (TYP.)IRRIGATIONCONTROL (TYP.)#4 REBAR#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947FLAGSTONE WALKC
O
V
E
R
E
D
F
L
A
G
S
T
O
N
E
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
S
T
U
C
C
O
W
A
L
L
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
WI
N
D
OWWE
L
LBOULDERWALL (TYP.)QUEEN STREETR-O-W WIDTH VARIESASPHALTNEALE AVENUER-O-W WIDTH VARIESASPHALT
ASPHALTDRIVEWAY
X
XFENCE(TYP.)FENCE(TYP.)LOT 1TI
E
R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G
W
A
L
LACCESS EASEMENT PER PLAT BK 13
PG 35AND LICENSE PER REC. NO. 498801MAILBOXMAILBOXA
D
J
O
I
N
E
R
S
H
E
DCONCRETEDRIVEWAYGRAVELPARKING LOT 215,160 S.F.±0.348 AC.±MULTI LEVEL WOOD& STONE FRAME HOUSEWITH BASEMENT17 QUEEN STREET110 NEALE AVENUEPARCEL 2PLAT BK 13 PG 35PARCEL 9HERRON PARKPLAT BK 13 PG 35SINGLE LEVEL WOOD& STONE FRAME ADUELEC.OUTLETC
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
I
D
EW
A
L
K
CONC
R
E
T
E
C
U
R
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
RFLAGSTONEWALK
STONEWALL(TYP.)POWERPOLEWATERFEATUREGRAVELCONCRETEDRIVEWAYSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSGASLINESEWERLINETTCONCRETE SIDEWALK SIGN(TYP.)COMM.MANHOLESCONCRETE BOXINV EL=7896.20'IRRIGATIONCONTROLGRAVELPARKINGPARCEL 2PROJECT AREA12' SEWERLINE EASEMENTPER BK 250 PG 477 &PLAT BK 13 PG 3512'WATERLINE EASEMENTPER BK 340 PG 1G G G G GGGGG
G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UETTTCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVW W W W W
WWWWWWWWEX-UEE
X
-
U
E
E
X
-
U
E
EX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UETT
T
G G G GWATERLINEGASLINE
ELECTRICCATVTELEPHONEOVERHEAD ELECTRICTIE RETAINING WALLU
P
P
E
R
L
E
V
E
L
W
O
O
D
D
E
C
KBOULDERWALL (TYP.)BOULDERWALL (TYP.)IRR.CONTROLDDDF.F.7914.6'RIDGE7933.9'RIDGE7936.0'CHIMNEY7940.0'F.F.7903.6'F.F.7908.8'F.F.7904.1'RIDGE7918.4'WWWWWWWWWWWW
STEELPOSTT1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10T11T12T13T14T15T16T17T18T19T20T21T22T23T24T25T26T27T28T29T30T31T32T33T34T35T36T37T38T39T40T41T42T43T44T45T46T47T48T49T50T51T52T53T54T55T56T57T58T59T60T61T62T63T64T65T66T67T68T69T70T71T72T73T74T75T76T77T78STORM DRAINRIM 7902.00'BOTT 7889.12'AREADRAINAREADRAINC.O.A. CONTROLQ-159 BEARSN77°07'51"W 1359.26'C.O.A. CONTROL#4 BEARSS32°07'00"W 387.54'7920
7923
79
2
0
7915790579107903
AREASLOPE TABLENUMBER123MIN. SLOPE0.001%20.000%30.000%MAX. SLOPE20.000%30.000%+COLOR10437.851975.242746.91ByNO.DateProject NO.RevisionDrawn By:Checked By:Date:Computer File:P.O. Box 1746Rifle, CO 81650Phone (970) 625-1954Fax (970) 579-7150www.peaksurveyinginc.comSNWEPeak Surveying, Inc.Since 200716029B1 OF 117 QUEEN, LLCCITY OF ASPEN, COLORADOIMPROVEMENT & TOPO SURVEYLOT 2, 114 NEALE/17QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT- 110 NEALE AVE.JRNJRNSEPT 27, 2018029-IMPTOPO110/19/18UPDATE SLOPE TABLEJRN210/22/18UPDATE SLOPE TABLEJRN305/12/20UPDATE SURVEYJRNNESW0306090120150180210240270300330P e a k Surveying, Inc.0101020405COL
O
R
ADO LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL LAND
S
U
RVEYOR
JAS
O
N R. NEIL37935IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT& TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYLOT 2, 114 NEALE/17QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLITACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED MAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONLOT 2, 114 NEALE/17QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED MAY 29,1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.NOTES:1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDINGSETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN INTHE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLCAND FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO. INC. COMMITMENT NO. 16003515, DATEDEFFECTIVE APRIL 20, 2016.2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS APRIL 27, 2016, SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 AND MAY 05, 2020.3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S50°20'03"E BETWEEN THENORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2, A #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE AND THENORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2, A #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE.4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE 114 NEALE/17QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISIONEXEMPTION PLAT RECORDED MAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17 AND THE BOUNDARYAGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 IN THE PITKINCOUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.6) BUILDING SETBACKS ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE FOR R-15A26.710.060 ARE AS FOLLOWS:FRONT YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 25'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 30'SIDE YARD SETBACK = 10'REAR YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 10'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 5'BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENTPRIOR TO ANY PLANNING OR CONSTRUCTION.7) ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERNCOLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ONSITE ELEVATION OF7903.71' ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.8) ACCORDING TO FEMA PANEL NO. 08097C0204C, DATED JUNE 04, 1987 THE SUBJECT PROPERTYIN NOT WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN.9) AT THE TIME OF THE MAY 05, 2020 FIELD VISIT MISC. EXTERIOR WORK WAS BEINGPERFORMED AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCES EXISTED.NORTHVICINITY MAPSCALE: 1" = 2000'SUBJECTPROPERTYIMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENTI, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO 17 QUEEN LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITYCOMPANY, THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE, CORRECT ANDCOMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAID OUT AND SHOWNHEREON; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY,EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS MADE BY MEFROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION ON APRIL 27, 2016, SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 AND MAY 05, 2020; THAT, IN THEPREPARATION OF THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, I RELIED UPON THE TITLE COMMITMENTPREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC AND FIRST AMERICANTITLE INSURANCE CO. INC. COMMITMENT NO. 16003515, DATED EFFECTIVE APRIL 20, 2016; THATTHE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OFWAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REAL PROPERTYAND MATTERS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT CAPABLE OF BEING SHOWN AREACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT IS IN ACCORDANCE OF AN IMPROVEMENTSURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9). DATED: MAY 12, 2020 BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC.86
25'-0"
FRONT YARD SETBACK
10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10'
REAR YARD
SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACKEXISTING PAVED DRIVEWAY
AND PARKING AREA
TO BE RECONFIGURED
EXISTING PATIO AND RETAINING
WALLS TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING PATIO TO BE
REMOVED AND ENCLOSED
EXISTING FRONT PORCH TO BE
REMOVED AND REPLACED
EXISTING
ROOF DECK
EXISTING
ROOF DECK
EXISTING FLAGSTONE WALK
TO BE REFINISHED
ACCESS EASEMENT TO
ADJACENT PARCEL
TRANSFORMER AND
ELECTRICAL PANEL
TERRACED PLANTING WALLS
TO BE REVISED BY LANDSCAPE
ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN
ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN
EXISTING SIDEWALK ENDS
AT CORNER OF NEALE AVE
AND QUEEN ST
TREES IN ZONE TO BE REMOVED DUE
TO ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS
SHED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY
ENCROACHES INTO SETBACK
EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN
EDGE OF PAVED DRIVEWAY
SERVING ADJACENT PARCEL
7901'7902'7903'7 9 0 4 '7 9 0 5 '7 9 0 6 '7 9 0 7 '7908'7909'7910'7911'7912'7 9 1 3 '7 9 1 4 '7 9 1 5 '7 9 1 7 '
7 9 1 8 '
7 9 1 9 '7920'7 9 2 2 '7 9 2 3 '7 9 2 4 '7 9 1 6 '7901'
7904'
7904'
7 9 2 1 'PROPERTY LINE
SIDE YARD SETBACK
NEALE AVENUE
EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K
REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E
7903'7904'7905'7906'7907'7908'7909'7910'7921'7911'7912'7913'QUEEN STREETEXISTING ADU
TO BE REPLACED BY NEW GARAGE
SOME WALLS TO REMAIN
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN
NEW DECIDUOUS TREE
NEW CONIFEROUS TREE
SITE PLAN LEGEND
EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR
EXISTING 5' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR
TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND
NSCALE: 1:901EXISTING SITE PLAN AT MAIN LEVEL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-001X
EXISTING SITE PLAN AT
MAIN LEVEL
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
87
10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10'
REAR YARD
SETBACK
25'-0"
FRONT YARD SETBACK
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
122'-23/4"
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
119'-93/4"
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
118'-51/2"
EXISTING FLAGSTONE WALK
TO BE REFINISHED
ACCESS EASEMENT TO
ADJACENT PARCEL
EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND
ELECTRICAL PANEL TO REMAIN
TERRACED PLANTING WALLS
TO BE REVISED BY LANDSCAPE
ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN
EXISTING FENCE AT 114 NEALE AVE
EDGE OF PAVED DRIVEWAY
SERVING ADJACENT PARCEL
EXISTING PAVED DRIVEWAY
AND PARKING AREA
TO BE RECONFIGURED
EXISTING PATIO TO BE
REMOVED AND ENCLOSED
EXISTING FRONT PORCH TO BE
REMOVED AND REPLACED
EXISTING
ROOF DECK
EXISTING
ROOF DECK
TREES IN ZONE TO BE REMOVED DUE
TO ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS.
TREES TO REMAIN WHERE POSSIBLE.
SHED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY
ENCROACHES INTO SETBACK
EXISTING PATIO AND RETAINING
WALLS TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAIN
EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAIN
EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAINEXISTING DRYWELLS TO REMAIN
ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN
TREES IN ZONE TO BE REMOVED DUE
TO ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS.
TREES TO REMAIN WHERE POSSIBLE.
PROPERTY LINE
SIDE YARD SETBACK
NEALE AVENUE
EXISTING SIDEWALK
NO PROPOSED CHANGES, TO BE
COORDINATED WITH COA
S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K
REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E
QUEEN STREET7901'7902'7903'7 9 0 4 '7 9 0 5 '7 9 0 6 '7 9 0 7 '7908'7909'7910'7911'7912'7 9 1 3 '7 9 1 4 '7 9 1 5 '7 9 1 7 '
7 9 1 8 '
7 9 1 9 '7920'7 9 2 2 '7 9 2 3 '7 9 2 4 '7 9 1 6 '7901'
7904'
7904'
7 9 2 1 '7903'7904'7905'7906'7907'7908'7909'7910'7921'7911'7912'7913'
7904'
7904'
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
118'-51/2"
T.O. STONE CAP (VIF)
123'-1"
T.O. STONE CAP (VIF)
125'-5"
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
119'-93/4"
EXISTING ADU
TO BE REPLACED BY NEW GARAGE
SOME WALLS TO REMAIN
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN
NEW DECIDUOUS TREE
NEW CONIFEROUS TREE
SITE PLAN LEGEND
EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR
EXISTING 5' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR
TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND
PROPOSED STANDING SEAM ROOF
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED
WITH SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
EXISTING SHAKE ROOF TO BE REFINISHED
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED
WITH STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF MATERIAL LEGEND
PROPOSED SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
NSCALE: 1:901EXISTING SITE PLAN AT ROOF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-002X
EXISTING SITE PLAN AT
ROOF
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
88
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN
NEW DECIDUOUS TREE
NEW CONIFEROUS TREE
SITE PLAN LEGEND
EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR
EXISTING 5' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR
TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND
25'-0"
FRONT YARD SETBACK
10'
REAR YARD
SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACKT.O. ENTRY PORCH
94'-33/4"
T.O. DECK
100'-3"
T.O. WALL
102'-3"
T.O. WALL
102'-11"
T.O. WALL
103'-11"
T.O. WALL
103'-11"
T.O. DECK
100'-3"
T.O. PATIO
99'-9"
T.O. PATIO
100'-3"
EXISTING FLAGSTONE WALK
TO BE REFINISHED
ACCESS EASEMENT TO
ADJACENT PARCEL
TRANSFORMER AND
ELECTRICAL PANEL
SHED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY
ENCROACHES INTO SETBACK
TERRACED PLANTING WALLS
TO BE REVISED BY LANDSCAPE
ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN
ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN
PROPOSED EXTENSION OF
SIDEWALK ALONG QUEEN STREET,
TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY OF
ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPT
STONE PLANTER
WITHIN 30" OF
GRADE IN SETBACK
STONE PLANTER
WITHIN 30" OF
GRADE IN SETBACK
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREADS
EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN
4343
4343
43
43
43
EDGE OF PAVED DRIVEWAY
SERVING ADJACENT PARCEL
32
LINE OF SHADE STRUCTURE ABOVE
4343
4343
43
43
32
32
7901'7902'7903'7 9 0 4 '7 9 0 5 '7 9 0 6 '7 9 0 7 '7908'7909'7910'7911'7912'7 9 1 3 '7 9 1 4 '7 9 1 5 '7 9 1 7 '
7 9 1 8 '
7 9 1 9 '7920'7 9 2 2 '7 9 2 3 '7 9 2 4 '7 9 1 6 '7901'
7904'
7904'
7 9 2 1 'PROPERTY LINE
SIDE YARD SETBACK
NEALE AVENUE
EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K
REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E
7903'7904'7905'7906'7907'7908'7909'7910'7921'7911'7912'7913'
110 NEALE AVENUE
ASPEN, CO 81611
PARCEL ID: 273707383002
PROJECT 100' = 7914.35'
PROPOSED
MASTER
BEDROOM PATIO
PROPOSED ROOF
DECK UNDER
TRELLIS
RECONFIGURED
DRIVEWAY AND
PARKING AREA
PROPOSED ROOF
DECK
110 NEALE AVENUE
ASPEN, CO 81611
PARCEL ID: 273707383002
PROJECT 100' = 7914.35'QUEEN STREETPROPOSED PATIO
AND MOVABLE
OUTDOOR KITCHEN
NEW FRONT PORCH
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN
NEW DECIDUOUS TREE
NEW CONIFEROUS TREE
SITE PLAN LEGEND
EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR
EXISTING 5' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR
TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND
NSCALE: 1:901PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT MAIN LEVEL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-001
PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT
MAIN LEVEL
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
89
10'
REAR YARD
SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK25'-0"
FRONT YARD SETBACK
T.O. RIDGE
122'-23/4"
T.O. RIDGE
119'-93/4"
T.O. RIDGE
118'-51/2"
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
118'-51/2"
T.O. PORCH ROOF AT EDGE
101'-73/4"
T.O. AUTOCOURT
PORCH ROOF
AT EDGE
98'-11"T.O. RIDGE
116'-31/4"
EXISTING FLAGSTONE WALK
TO BE REFINISHED
ACCESS EASEMENT TO
ADJACENT PARCEL
EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND
ELECTRICAL PANEL TO REMAIN
TERRACED PLANTING WALLS
TO BE REVISED BY LANDSCAPE
ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN
PROPOSED EXTENSION OF
SIDEWALK ALONG QUEEN STREET,
TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY OF
ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPT.
STREET PARKING TO BE MAINTAINED
STONE PLANTER
WITHIN 30" OF
GRADE IN SETBACK
STONE PLANTER
WITHIN 30" OF
GRADE IN SETBACK
EXISTING FENCE AT 114 NEALE AVE
EDGE OF PAVED DRIVEWAY
SERVING ADJACENT PARCEL
EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAIN
EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAIN
EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAINEXISTING DRYWELLS TO REMAIN
ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING,
UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED,
TREES TO REMAIN
PROPERTY LINE
SIDE YARD SETBACK
NEALE AVENUE
EXISTING SIDEWALK
NO PROPOSED CHANGES, TO BE
COORDINATED WITH COA
S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K
REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E
PROPOSED
MASTER
BEDROOM PATIO
PROPOSED ROOF
DECK UNDER
PERGOLA
RECONFIGURED
DRIVEWAY AND
PARKING AREA
PROPOSED ROOF
DECK
QUEEN STREET7901'7902'7903'7 9 0 4 '7 9 0 5 '7 9 0 6 '7 9 0 7 '7908'7909'7910'7911'7912'7 9 1 3 '7 9 1 4 '7 9 1 5 '7 9 1 7 '
7 9 1 8 '
7 9 1 9 '7920'7 9 2 2 '7 9 2 3 '7 9 2 4 '7 9 1 6 '7901'
7904'
7904'
7 9 2 1 '7903'7904'7905'7906'7907'7908'7909'7910'7921'7911'7912'7913'
7904'
7904'
T.O. RIDGE
119'-93/4"
T.O. RIDGE
118'-51/2"
LINE OF PERGOLA
PROPOSED PATIO
AND MOVABLE
OUTDOOR KITCHEN
PROPOSED FRONT
PORCH ROOF
110 NEALE AVENUE
ASPEN, CO 81611
PARCEL ID: 273707383002
PROJECT 100' = 7914.35'
T.O. STONE CAP
113'-11/4"
T.O. STONE CAP (VIF)
123'-1"
T.O. STONE CAP (VIF)
125'-5"
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE
REMOVED
EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN
NEW DECIDUOUS TREE
NEW CONIFEROUS TREE
SITE PLAN LEGEND
EXISTING 1' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR
EXISTING 5' CONTOUR
PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR
TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND
PROPOSED STANDING SEAM ROOF
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED
WITH SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
EXISTING SHAKE ROOF TO BE REFINISHED
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED
WITH STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF MATERIAL LEGEND
PROPOSED SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
NSCALE: 1:901PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT ROOF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-002
PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT
ROOF
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
90
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-006
BASEMENT WALL
DEMOLITION
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20192.00 sq ft66.50 sq ft
126.00 sq ft
123.75 sq ft
21.75 sq ft
154.75 sq ft
189.75 sq ft 38.50 sq ft
164.50 sq ft
15.75 sq ft
118.50 sq ft
209.00 sq ft
205.75 sq ft
211.50 sq ft
219.75 sq ft
77.75 sq ft
52.00 sq ft
16.50 sq ft
51.00 sq ft
25.75 sq ft 25.75 sq ft
6.25 sq ft 15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft62.50 sq ft 19.75 sq ft7.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.75 sq ft25.75 sq ft16.75 sq ft
13.75 sq ft13.75 sq ft33.50 sq ft
28.00 sq ft29.25 sq ft 35.25 sq ft 22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft7.75 sq ft72.75 sq ft 72.75 sq ft 22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft15.25 sq ft15.25 sq ft28.75 sq ft14.25 sq ft29.50 sq ft13.75 sq ft7.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft23.50 sq ft20.75 sq ft26.25 sq ft
16.25 sq ft16.25 sq ft
26.25 sq ft
72.50 sq ft
22.25 sq ft43.25 sq ft
61.00 sq ft
29.50 sq ft
120.00 sq ft170.00 sq ft
388.50 sq ft
197.75 sq ft
114.25 sq ft
183.00 sq ft
16.25 sq ft87.25 sq ft 12.25 sq ft31.25 sq ft 12.00 sq ft150.75 sq ft
182.00 sq ft
83.50 sq ft
180.00 sq ft130.50 sq ft118.75 sq ft
64.25 sq ft162.75 sq ft 152.50 sq ft18.25 sq ft96.75 sq ft 12.75 sq ft29.75 sq ft93.75 sq ft
89.00 sq ft
106.75 sq ft
59.75 sq ft
81.25 sq ft101.00 sq ft
8.00 sq ft64.00 sq ft
38.25 sq ft
59.75 sq ft
22.75 sq ft
145.25 sq ft
W1 W2 W3
W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19
W20 W21 W22 W23 W24 W25 W26 W27 W28 W29 W30 W31
W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9
W10
W32
W34 W35 W36 W37 W39W38W33 W40
AW1 AW2 AW3 AW4 AW5 AW6 AW7 AW8
205.75 sq ft
24.00 sq ft
6.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft48.75 sq ft
9.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft76.75 sq ft
26.25 sq ft26.25 sq ft9.25 sq ft25.50 sq ft13.50 sq ft22.25 sq ft
15.50 sq ft15.50 sq ft
10.50 sq ft
9.00 sq ft207.75 sq ft
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
AREA REDUCED FOR FENSTRATION
DEMO CALC FILL LEGEND
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
9
9
4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof
110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave
Demolition Demolition
Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)
AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00
AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25
AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50
AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00
AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00
AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00
AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00
AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00
R3 54.50 0.00 0.00
W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00
W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00
W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25
W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00
W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00
W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75
W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00
W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75
W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00
W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00
W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75
W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50
W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75
W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50
W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50
W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50
W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25
W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00
W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00
W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00
W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25
W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50
W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00
W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00
W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00
W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00
W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00
W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00
W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00
W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00
W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75
W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00
W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25
W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00
W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75
W36 205.75 15.50 190.25
W37 211.50 145.50 66.00
W38 219.75 59.25 160.50
W39 52.00 29.50 22.50
W40 77.75 9.25 43.25
Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00
Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25
Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75
Demolition Totals
Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00
Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50
Total 32.83%
Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof
110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave
Demolition Demolition
Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)
AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00
AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25
AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50
AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00
AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00
AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00
AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00
AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00
R3 54.50 0.00 0.00
W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00
W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00
W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25
W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00
W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00
W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75
W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00
W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75
W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00
W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00
W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75
W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50
W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75
W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50
W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50
W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50
W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25
W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00
W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00
W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00
W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25
W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50
W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00
W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00
W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00
W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00
W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00
W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00
W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00
W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00
W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75
W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00
W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25
W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00
W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75
W36 205.75 15.50 190.25
W37 211.50 145.50 66.00
W38 219.75 59.25 160.50
W39 52.00 29.50 22.50
W40 77.75 9.25 43.25
Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00
Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25
Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75
Demolition Totals
Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00
Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50
Total 32.83%
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WALL DEMO AREA
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 BASEMENT LEVEL DEMO PLAN
NO COUNTABLE WALL DEMO AREA AT
BASEMENT LEVEL
91
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-007
GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL
WALL DEMOLITION
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20192.00 sq ft66.50 sq ft
126.00 sq ft
123.75 sq ft
21.75 sq ft
154.75 sq ft
189.75 sq ft 38.50 sq ft
164.50 sq ft
15.75 sq ft
118.50 sq ft
209.00 sq ft
205.75 sq ft
211.50 sq ft
219.75 sq ft
77.75 sq ft
52.00 sq ft
16.50 sq ft
51.00 sq ft
25.75 sq ft 25.75 sq ft
6.25 sq ft 15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft62.50 sq ft 19.75 sq ft7.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.75 sq ft25.75 sq ft16.75 sq ft
13.75 sq ft13.75 sq ft33.50 sq ft
28.00 sq ft29.25 sq ft 35.25 sq ft 22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft7.75 sq ft72.75 sq ft 72.75 sq ft 22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft15.25 sq ft15.25 sq ft28.75 sq ft14.25 sq ft29.50 sq ft13.75 sq ft7.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft23.50 sq ft20.75 sq ft26.25 sq ft
16.25 sq ft16.25 sq ft
26.25 sq ft
72.50 sq ft
22.25 sq ft43.25 sq ft
61.00 sq ft
29.50 sq ft
120.00 sq ft170.00 sq ft
388.50 sq ft
197.75 sq ft
114.25 sq ft
183.00 sq ft
16.25 sq ft87.25 sq ft 12.25 sq ft31.25 sq ft 12.00 sq ft150.75 sq ft
182.00 sq ft
83.50 sq ft
180.00 sq ft130.50 sq ft118.75 sq ft
64.25 sq ft162.75 sq ft 152.50 sq ft18.25 sq ft96.75 sq ft 12.75 sq ft29.75 sq ft93.75 sq ft
89.00 sq ft
106.75 sq ft
59.75 sq ft
81.25 sq ft101.00 sq ft
8.00 sq ft64.00 sq ft
38.25 sq ft
59.75 sq ft
22.75 sq ft
145.25 sq ft
W1 W2 W3
W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19
W20 W21 W22 W23 W24 W25 W26 W27 W28 W29 W30 W31
W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9
W10
W32
W34 W35 W36 W37 W39W38W33 W40
AW1 AW2 AW3 AW4 AW5 AW6 AW7 AW8
205.75 sq ft
24.00 sq ft
6.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft48.75 sq ft
9.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft76.75 sq ft
26.25 sq ft26.25 sq ft9.25 sq ft25.50 sq ft13.50 sq ft22.25 sq ft
15.50 sq ft15.50 sq ft
10.50 sq ft
9.00 sq ft207.75 sq ft
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
AREA REDUCED FOR FENSTRATION
DEMO CALC FILL LEGEND
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
W1W2W3 AW2W40 W39W38 W37W36
W34 AW4AW3
AW1 AW8AW5
AW6AW7
9
9
4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof
110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave
Demolition Demolition
Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)
AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00
AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25
AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50
AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00
AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00
AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00
AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00
AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00
R3 54.50 0.00 0.00
W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00
W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00
W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25
W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00
W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00
W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75
W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00
W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75
W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00
W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00
W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75
W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50
W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75
W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50
W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50
W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50
W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25
W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00
W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00
W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00
W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25
W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50
W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00
W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00
W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00
W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00
W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00
W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00
W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00
W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00
W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75
W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00
W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25
W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00
W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75
W36 205.75 15.50 190.25
W37 211.50 145.50 66.00
W38 219.75 59.25 160.50
W39 52.00 29.50 22.50
W40 77.75 9.25 43.25
Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00
Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25
Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75
Demolition Totals
Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00
Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50
Total 32.83%
Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof
110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave
Demolition Demolition
Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)
AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00
AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25
AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50
AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00
AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00
AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00
AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00
AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00
R3 54.50 0.00 0.00
W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00
W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00
W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25
W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00
W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00
W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75
W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00
W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75
W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00
W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00
W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75
W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50
W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75
W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50
W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50
W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50
W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25
W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00
W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00
W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00
W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25
W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50
W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00
W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00
W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00
W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00
W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00
W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00
W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00
W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00
W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75
W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00
W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25
W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00
W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75
W36 205.75 15.50 190.25
W37 211.50 145.50 66.00
W38 219.75 59.25 160.50
W39 52.00 29.50 22.50
W40 77.75 9.25 43.25
Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00
Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25
Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75
Demolition Totals
Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00
Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50
Total 32.83%
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WALL DEMO AREA
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL DEMO PLAN
92
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-008
MAIN LEVEL WALL
DEMOLITION
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20192.00 sq ft66.50 sq ft
126.00 sq ft
123.75 sq ft
21.75 sq ft
154.75 sq ft
189.75 sq ft 38.50 sq ft
164.50 sq ft
15.75 sq ft
118.50 sq ft
209.00 sq ft
205.75 sq ft
211.50 sq ft
219.75 sq ft
77.75 sq ft
52.00 sq ft
16.50 sq ft
51.00 sq ft
25.75 sq ft 25.75 sq ft
6.25 sq ft 15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft62.50 sq ft 19.75 sq ft7.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.75 sq ft25.75 sq ft16.75 sq ft
13.75 sq ft13.75 sq ft33.50 sq ft
28.00 sq ft29.25 sq ft 35.25 sq ft 22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft7.75 sq ft72.75 sq ft 72.75 sq ft 22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft15.25 sq ft15.25 sq ft28.75 sq ft14.25 sq ft29.50 sq ft13.75 sq ft7.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft23.50 sq ft20.75 sq ft26.25 sq ft
16.25 sq ft16.25 sq ft
26.25 sq ft
72.50 sq ft
22.25 sq ft43.25 sq ft
61.00 sq ft
29.50 sq ft
120.00 sq ft170.00 sq ft
388.50 sq ft
197.75 sq ft
114.25 sq ft
183.00 sq ft
16.25 sq ft87.25 sq ft 12.25 sq ft31.25 sq ft 12.00 sq ft150.75 sq ft
182.00 sq ft
83.50 sq ft
180.00 sq ft130.50 sq ft118.75 sq ft
64.25 sq ft162.75 sq ft 152.50 sq ft18.25 sq ft96.75 sq ft 12.75 sq ft29.75 sq ft93.75 sq ft
89.00 sq ft
106.75 sq ft
59.75 sq ft
81.25 sq ft101.00 sq ft
8.00 sq ft64.00 sq ft
38.25 sq ft
59.75 sq ft
22.75 sq ft
145.25 sq ft
W1 W2 W3
W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19
W20 W21 W22 W23 W24 W25 W26 W27 W28 W29 W30 W31
W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9
W10
W32
W34 W35 W36 W37 W39W38W33 W40
AW1 AW2 AW3 AW4 AW5 AW6 AW7 AW8
205.75 sq ft
24.00 sq ft
6.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft48.75 sq ft
9.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft76.75 sq ft
26.25 sq ft26.25 sq ft9.25 sq ft25.50 sq ft13.50 sq ft22.25 sq ft
15.50 sq ft15.50 sq ft
10.50 sq ft
9.00 sq ft207.75 sq ft
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
AREA REDUCED FOR FENSTRATION
DEMO CALC FILL LEGEND
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
W1W2W3W4W5W6W7W8W9W10W11W12W13W14W15W16W17W18W19W20W21W22W23W24W25 W26W27
W28W29
W30W31
W329
9
4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
RXX
RXX
RXX
RXX
RXX
RXX
Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof
110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave
Demolition Demolition
Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)
AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00
AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25
AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50
AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00
AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00
AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00
AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00
AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00
R3 54.50 0.00 0.00
W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00
W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00
W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25
W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00
W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00
W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75
W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00
W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75
W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00
W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00
W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75
W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50
W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75
W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50
W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50
W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50
W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25
W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00
W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00
W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00
W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25
W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50
W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00
W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00
W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00
W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00
W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00
W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00
W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00
W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00
W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75
W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00
W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25
W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00
W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75
W36 205.75 15.50 190.25
W37 211.50 145.50 66.00
W38 219.75 59.25 160.50
W39 52.00 29.50 22.50
W40 77.75 9.25 43.25
Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00
Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25
Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75
Demolition Totals
Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00
Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50
Total 32.83%
Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof
110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave
Demolition Demolition
Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)
AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00
AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25
AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50
AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00
AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00
AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00
AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00
AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00
R3 54.50 0.00 0.00
W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00
W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00
W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25
W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00
W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00
W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75
W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00
W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75
W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00
W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00
W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75
W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50
W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75
W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50
W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50
W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50
W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25
W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00
W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00
W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00
W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25
W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50
W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00
W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00
W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00
W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00
W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00
W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00
W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00
W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00
W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75
W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00
W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25
W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00
W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75
W36 205.75 15.50 190.25
W37 211.50 145.50 66.00
W38 219.75 59.25 160.50
W39 52.00 29.50 22.50
W40 77.75 9.25 43.25
Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00
Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25
Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75
Demolition Totals
Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00
Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50
Total 32.83%
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WALL DEMO AREA
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL DEMO PLAN
93
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-009
ROOF DEMOLITION
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
68.00 sq ft
18.25 sq ft18.25 sq ft
98.00 sq ft
29.75 sq ft
58.25 sq ft
78.00 sq ft
77.25 sq ft
225.00 sq ft
101.25 sq ft
23.50 sq ft
23.50 sq ft
214.50 sq ft
590.00 sq ft
289.00 sq ft
630.00 sq ft
139.00 sq ft
44.50 sq ft
554.50 sq ft
71.75 sq ft
88.00 sq ft
220.25 sq ft
42.25 sq ft42.25 sq ft
178.00 sq ft
306.00 sq ft
176.25 sq ft
79.50 sq ft
85.75 sq ft
54.50 sq ft
88.50 sq ft
53.00 sq ft
113.00 sq ft
134.50 sq ft
170.25 sq ft
255.00 sq ft
18.50 sq ft
61.00 sq ft
61.75 sq ft
19.50 sq ft
219.50 sq ft39.75 sq ft
4.25 sq ft105.50 sq ft105.50 sq ft
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
R11
R12
R13
R15
R14
R16
R17
R18
R20
R21
R19
R22
R23
R25
R24
R26
R27
R28
R29
R30
R32
AR1
AR2
AR3
AR4
AR5
R33
R34
R31
R3554.50 sq ft20.75 sq ft
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
AREA REDUCED FOR FENSTRATION
DEMO CALC FILL LEGEND
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
R26
R27
R29
R28 R30
R33
R35
R34
R25R21
R20 R22 R24
R19
R18
R17
R15
R14
R13
R11
R12
R16
R9
R5
R4
9
9
R6
R7
R8 R10
4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
R31
R32
AR1 AR2
AR3
AR4
AR5R23
R3
R2
R1
Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof
110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave
Demolition Demolition
Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)
AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00
AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25
AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50
AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00
AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00
AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00
AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00
AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00
R3 54.50 0.00 0.00
W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00
W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00
W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25
W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00
W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00
W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75
W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00
W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75
W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00
W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00
W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75
W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50
W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75
W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50
W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50
W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50
W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25
W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00
W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00
W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00
W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25
W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50
W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00
W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00
W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00
W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00
W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00
W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00
W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00
W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00
W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75
W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00
W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25
W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00
W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75
W36 205.75 15.50 190.25
W37 211.50 145.50 66.00
W38 219.75 59.25 160.50
W39 52.00 29.50 22.50
W40 77.75 9.25 43.25
Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00
Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25
Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75
Demolition Totals
Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00
Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50
Total 32.83%
Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof
110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave
Demolition Demolition
Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft)
Area Reduced for
Fenestration
(Sq Ft)
Area to be Removed
(Sq Ft)
AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00
AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25
AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50
AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00
AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00
AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00
AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00
AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00
R3 54.50 0.00 0.00
W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00
W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00
W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25
W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00
W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00
W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75
W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00
W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75
W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00
W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00
W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75
W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50
W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75
W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50
W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50
W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50
W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25
W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00
W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00
W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00
W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25
W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50
W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00
W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00
W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00
W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00
W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00
W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00
W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00
W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00
W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75
W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00
W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25
W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00
W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75
W36 205.75 15.50 190.25
W37 211.50 145.50 66.00
W38 219.75 59.25 160.50
W39 52.00 29.50 22.50
W40 77.75 9.25 43.25
Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00
Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25
Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75
Demolition Totals
Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00
Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50
Total 32.83%
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WALL DEMO AREA
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF LEVEL DEMO PLAN
94
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-010X
FLOOR AREA
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
85.25 sq ft 63.00 sq ft 27.75 sq ft
153.75 sq ft 100.50 sq ft 80.00 sq ft 8.25 sq ft66.00 sq ft 389.25 sq ft
249.50 sq ft 418.00 sq ft
80.00 sq ft
144.50 sq ft 9.50 sq ft39.50 sq ft
XB1 XB2 XB3 XB4 XB5 XB6
XB9 XB10 XB11
XB7 XB8
XB12
COUNTABLE
FAR PLAN LEGEND
DECK
GARAGE
EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO
BELOW
EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH
EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO
2,064.75 sq ft
XB1XB2XB3 XB12XB11XB6XB4XB5
CRAWL SPACE
9
9XB10XB9XB8XB7
4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
110 Neale Avenue
Existing Basement Level Floor Area
Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,064.75
Existing Lower Level Floor Area
Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,347.00
Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00
Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)483.00
Existing Main Level Floor Area
Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,756.50
Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)110.25
Front Portch (Exempt)66.00
Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)780.50
Existing "ADU" Floor Area
ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50
Front Portch (Exempt)30.25
Existing Basement Level Wall Calculations
Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XB1 153.75 0.00
XB2 100.50 0.00
XB3 80.00 0.00
XB4 8.25 0.00
XB5 66.00 0.00
XB6 389.25 0.00
XB7 144.50 0.00
XB8 9.50 0.00
XB9 249.50 0.00
XB10 418.00 85.25
XB11 80.00 63.00
XB12 39.50 31.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)1,738.75
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)179.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)10.32%
Existing Basement Level Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,064.75
Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Basement Level Area x
Percent Exposed @
10.32%
Existing Lower Level Wall Calculations
Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XL1 84.25 0.00
XL2 103.00 57.00
XL3 80.75 54.50
XL4 8.00 5.25
XL5 82.25 18.75
XL6 8.00 1.00
XL7 86.75 6.00
XL8 224.75 0.00
XL9 101.00 0.00
XL10 150.50 0.00
XL11 148.75 0.00
XL12 12.75 0.00
XL13 253.75 89.50
XL14 177.25 177.25
XL15 201.25 201.25
XL16 200.25 200.25
XL17 201.25 201.25
XL18 43.25 43.25
XL19 82.75 82.75
XL20 19.25 19.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,269.75
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,157.25
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)50.99%
Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,347.00
Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00
Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)483.00
Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)116.50 (500-250)/2
Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,463.50
Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Lower Level Area x
Percent Exposed @
50.99%
Existing Main Level Wall Calculations
Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XM1 368.00 368.00
XM2 124.25 124.25
XM3 73.25 73.25
XM4 8.50 8.50
XM5 73.50 73.50
XM6 73.50 73.50
XM7 8.75 8.75
XM8 36.00 36.00
XM9 98.00 98.00
XM10 181.75 181.75
XM11 167.50 165.75
XM12 14.50 12.50
XM13 66.25 51.75
XM14 118.50 82.00
XM15 14.50 9.75
XM16 51.75 35.50
XM17 14.50 9.75
XM18 211.25 156.75
XM19 243.00 184.50
XM20 40.50 39.00
XM21 100.00 99.00
XM22 151.00 151.00
XM23 151.50 151.50
XM24 76.75 76.75
XM25 175.50 175.50
XM26 125.50 125.50
XM27 29.00 29.00
XM28 14.00 14.00
XM29 140.50 140.50
XM30 194.25 194.25
XM31 175.50 175.50
XM32 171.25 171.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,492.50
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,296.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.39%
Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,756.50
Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)110.25
Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,646.25 2756.50-110.25
Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
Main Level Area x Percent
Exposed @ 94.39%
Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)66.00 Exempt Front Porch
Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)780.50
Existing ADU Wall Calculations
ADU Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XA1 81.25 81.25
XA2 66.50 66.50
XA3 106.50 106.50
XA4 190.00 179.00
XA5 106.50 74.75
XA6 9.75 8.00
XA7 81.25 64.00
XA8 105.50 100.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)747.25
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)680.25
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)91.03%
Existing ADU Floor Area Calculations
ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50
ADU Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
ADU Area x Percent
Exposed @ 91.03%
Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)30.25 Exempt Front Porch
Total Exsiting Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07
Total Existing Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Exempt Deck Area based on 15% of Allowable FAR 0.00 3,965.97 x 0.15
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Total Existing Floor Area 5,116.57
Existing Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07
Total Existing Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR
(NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08
Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50
Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable
Deck 780.50
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain
current measured floor area per the plans.
Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA)
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL EXPOSURE
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA
95
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-011X
FLOOR AREA
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
COUNTABLE
FAR PLAN LEGEND
DECK
GARAGE
EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO
BELOW
EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH
EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO40.00 sq ft 6.50 sq ft19.00 sq ft
1.25 sq ft2.50 sq ft64.25 sq ft
89.50 sq ft
84.25 sq ft
103.00 sq ft 80.75 sq ft
8.00 sq ft82.25 sq ft
8.00 sq ft86.75 sq ft 224.75 sq ft 101.00 sq ft
150.50 sq ft 148.75 sq ft 12.75 sq ft253.75 sq ft 177.25 sq ft 204.25 sq ft
200.25 sq ft 204.25 sq ft 43.25 sq ft 82.75 sq ft 19.25 sq ft
XL1 XL2 XL3 XL4 XL5 XL6 XL7 XL8 XL9
XL10 XL11 XL12 XL13 XL14 XL15
XL16 XL17 XL18 XL19 XL20
190.00 sq ft
106.50 sq ft
9.75 sq ft81.25 sq ft
109.75 sq ft
81.25 sq ft 62.00 sq ft 106.50 sq ft 179.00 sq ft
74.75 sq ft
8.00 sq ft64.00 sq ft
104.75 sq ft
XA1 XA2 XA3 XA4 XA5 XA6 XA7 XA8
110 Neale Avenue
Existing Basement Level Floor Area
Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,064.75
Existing Lower Level Floor Area
Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,347.00
Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00
Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)483.00
Existing Main Level Floor Area
Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,756.50
Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)110.25
Front Portch (Exempt)66.00
Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)780.50
Existing "ADU" Floor Area
ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50
Front Portch (Exempt)30.25
Existing Basement Level Wall Calculations
Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XB1 153.75 0.00
XB2 100.50 0.00
XB3 80.00 0.00
XB4 8.25 0.00
XB5 66.00 0.00
XB6 389.25 0.00
XB7 144.50 0.00
XB8 9.50 0.00
XB9 249.50 0.00
XB10 418.00 85.25
XB11 80.00 63.00
XB12 39.50 31.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)1,738.75
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)179.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)10.32%
Existing Basement Level Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,064.75
Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Basement Level Area x
Percent Exposed @
10.32%
Existing Lower Level Wall Calculations
Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XL1 84.25 0.00
XL2 103.00 57.00
XL3 80.75 54.50
XL4 8.00 5.25
XL5 82.25 18.75
XL6 8.00 1.00
XL7 86.75 6.00
XL8 224.75 0.00
XL9 101.00 0.00
XL10 150.50 0.00
XL11 148.75 0.00
XL12 12.75 0.00
XL13 253.75 89.50
XL14 177.25 177.25
XL15 201.25 201.25
XL16 200.25 200.25
XL17 201.25 201.25
XL18 43.25 43.25
XL19 82.75 82.75
XL20 19.25 19.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,269.75
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,157.25
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)50.99%
Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,347.00
Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00
Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)483.00
Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)116.50 (500-250)/2
Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,463.50
Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Lower Level Area x
Percent Exposed @
50.99%
Existing Main Level Wall Calculations
Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XM1 368.00 368.00
XM2 124.25 124.25
XM3 73.25 73.25
XM4 8.50 8.50
XM5 73.50 73.50
XM6 73.50 73.50
XM7 8.75 8.75
XM8 36.00 36.00
XM9 98.00 98.00
XM10 181.75 181.75
XM11 167.50 165.75
XM12 14.50 12.50
XM13 66.25 51.75
XM14 118.50 82.00
XM15 14.50 9.75
XM16 51.75 35.50
XM17 14.50 9.75
XM18 211.25 156.75
XM19 243.00 184.50
XM20 40.50 39.00
XM21 100.00 99.00
XM22 151.00 151.00
XM23 151.50 151.50
XM24 76.75 76.75
XM25 175.50 175.50
XM26 125.50 125.50
XM27 29.00 29.00
XM28 14.00 14.00
XM29 140.50 140.50
XM30 194.25 194.25
XM31 175.50 175.50
XM32 171.25 171.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,492.50
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,296.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.39%
Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,756.50
Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)110.25
Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,646.25 2756.50-110.25
Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
Main Level Area x Percent
Exposed @ 94.39%
Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)66.00 Exempt Front Porch
Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)780.50
Existing ADU Wall Calculations
ADU Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XA1 81.25 81.25
XA2 66.50 66.50
XA3 106.50 106.50
XA4 190.00 179.00
XA5 106.50 74.75
XA6 9.75 8.00
XA7 81.25 64.00
XA8 105.50 100.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)747.25
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)680.25
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)91.03%
Existing ADU Floor Area Calculations
ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50
ADU Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
ADU Area x Percent
Exposed @ 91.03%
Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)30.25 Exempt Front Porch
Total Exsiting Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07
Total Existing Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Exempt Deck Area based on 15% of Allowable FAR 0.00 3,965.97 x 0.15
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Total Existing Floor Area 5,116.57
Existing Floor Area Calculations
483.00 sq ft
405.50 sq ft
XL1XL2XL3XL4XL5XL6XL7XL8XL9XL10XL11XL12 XL13
XL14XL15
XL16XL17
XL18XL19
XL20XA1
XA2XA3XA4XA5 XA6XA7
XA8CRAWL SPACE
9
9
2,347.75 sq ft
4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07
Total Existing Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR
(NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08
Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50
Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable
Deck 780.50
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain
current measured floor area per the plans.
Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA)
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL EXPOSURE
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING ADU EXPOSURE
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL FLOOR AREA
96
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-012X
FLOOR AREA
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
COUNTABLE
FAR PLAN LEGEND
DECK
GARAGE
EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO
BELOW
EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH
EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO
14.50 sq ft51.75 sq ft14.50 sq ft118.50 sq ft66.25 sq ft 14.50 sq ft164.50 sq ft238.50 sq ft203.00 sq ft
149.50 sq ft
217.00 sq ft
178.50 sq ft
363.75 sq ft
181.25 sq ft
80.00 sq ft
162.50 sq ft
12.75 sq ft53.25 sq ft 83.00 sq ft
10.00 sq ft35.50 sq ft
9.75 sq ft38.00 sq ft 103.50 sq ft 151.00 sq ft 151.50 sq ft
75.75 sq ft 188.50 sq ft 134.75 sq ft 31.25 sq ft15.00 sq ft151.00 sq ft 188.50 sq ft 181.25 sq ft9.75 sq ft85.50 sq ft 85.50 sq ft 9.75 sq ft35.25 sq ft103.50 sq ft 181.75 sq ft
XM1 XM2
XM3 XM11 XM12
XM13 XM14 XM15 XM16 XM17 XM18 XM19 XM20 XM21 XM22 XM23
XM24 XM25 XM26 XM27 XM28 XM29 XM30 XM31
XM32
XM4 XM5 XM6 XM7 XM8 XM9 XM10
65.00 sq ft
189.00 sq ft
288.25 sq ft
134.25 sq ft
FF
129.25 sq ft
XM1XM2XM3XM4XM5XM6XM7XM8XM9XM10XM11XM12XM13XM14XM15XM16XM17XM18XM19XM20XM21XM22XM23XM24XM25 XM26XM27
XM28XM29
XM30XM31
XM3260.50 sq ft
9
9RG4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
2,756.50 sq ft
42.25 sq ft
110 Neale Avenue
Existing Basement Level Floor Area
Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,064.75
Existing Lower Level Floor Area
Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,347.00
Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00
Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)483.00
Existing Main Level Floor Area
Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,756.50
Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)110.25
Front Portch (Exempt)66.00
Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)780.50
Existing "ADU" Floor Area
ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50
Front Portch (Exempt)30.25
Existing Basement Level Wall Calculations
Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XB1 153.75 0.00
XB2 100.50 0.00
XB3 80.00 0.00
XB4 8.25 0.00
XB5 66.00 0.00
XB6 389.25 0.00
XB7 144.50 0.00
XB8 9.50 0.00
XB9 249.50 0.00
XB10 418.00 85.25
XB11 80.00 63.00
XB12 39.50 31.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)1,738.75
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)179.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)10.32%
Existing Basement Level Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,064.75
Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Basement Level Area x
Percent Exposed @
10.32%
Existing Lower Level Wall Calculations
Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XL1 84.25 0.00
XL2 103.00 57.00
XL3 80.75 54.50
XL4 8.00 5.25
XL5 82.25 18.75
XL6 8.00 1.00
XL7 86.75 6.00
XL8 224.75 0.00
XL9 101.00 0.00
XL10 150.50 0.00
XL11 148.75 0.00
XL12 12.75 0.00
XL13 253.75 89.50
XL14 177.25 177.25
XL15 201.25 201.25
XL16 200.25 200.25
XL17 201.25 201.25
XL18 43.25 43.25
XL19 82.75 82.75
XL20 19.25 19.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,269.75
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,157.25
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)50.99%
Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,347.00
Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00
Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)483.00
Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)116.50 (500-250)/2
Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,463.50
Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Lower Level Area x
Percent Exposed @
50.99%
Existing Main Level Wall Calculations
Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XM1 368.00 368.00
XM2 124.25 124.25
XM3 73.25 73.25
XM4 8.50 8.50
XM5 73.50 73.50
XM6 73.50 73.50
XM7 8.75 8.75
XM8 36.00 36.00
XM9 98.00 98.00
XM10 181.75 181.75
XM11 167.50 165.75
XM12 14.50 12.50
XM13 66.25 51.75
XM14 118.50 82.00
XM15 14.50 9.75
XM16 51.75 35.50
XM17 14.50 9.75
XM18 211.25 156.75
XM19 243.00 184.50
XM20 40.50 39.00
XM21 100.00 99.00
XM22 151.00 151.00
XM23 151.50 151.50
XM24 76.75 76.75
XM25 175.50 175.50
XM26 125.50 125.50
XM27 29.00 29.00
XM28 14.00 14.00
XM29 140.50 140.50
XM30 194.25 194.25
XM31 175.50 175.50
XM32 171.25 171.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,492.50
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,296.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.39%
Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,756.50
Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)110.25
Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,646.25 2756.50-110.25
Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
Main Level Area x Percent
Exposed @ 94.39%
Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)66.00 Exempt Front Porch
Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)780.50
Existing ADU Wall Calculations
ADU Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
XA1 81.25 81.25
XA2 66.50 66.50
XA3 106.50 106.50
XA4 190.00 179.00
XA5 106.50 74.75
XA6 9.75 8.00
XA7 81.25 64.00
XA8 105.50 100.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)747.25
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)680.25
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)91.03%
Existing ADU Floor Area Calculations
ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50
ADU Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
ADU Area x Percent
Exposed @ 91.03%
Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)30.25 Exempt Front Porch
Total Exsiting Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07
Total Existing Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Exempt Deck Area based on 15% of Allowable FAR 0.00 3,965.97 x 0.15
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Total Existing Floor Area 5,116.57
Existing Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07
Total Existing Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR
(NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08
Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50
Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable
Deck 780.50
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain
current measured floor area per the plans.
Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA)
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXPOSURE
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA
97
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-010
FLOOR AREA
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
COUNTABLE
FAR PLAN LEGEND
DECK
GARAGE
EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO
BELOW
EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH
EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO
248.00 sq ft
47.50 sq ft
146.50 sq ft 77.25 sq ft
176.50 sq ft 114.75 sq ft 153.75 sq ft 378.25 sq ft 147.50 sq ft
12.50 sq ft198.25 sq ft
564.25 sq ft 421.00 sq ft
40.50 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ftB1 B2 B3 B4 B5
B6 B7 B11
B12 B13 B14
B8 B9 B10
Proposed Floor Area Calculations
110 Neale
Proposed Basement Level Floor Area
Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)4,149.50
Prposed Garage Level Floor Area
Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,801.75
Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00
Garage Level Patio (Exempt)257,25
Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)491.75
Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,890.75
Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)210.50
Main Level Patio (Exempt)463.25
Front Portch (Exempt)228.75
Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)778.50
Proposed "ADU" Floor Area Calculations
ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Front Portch (Exempt)0.00
FAR
Proposed Basement Level Wall Calculations
Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
PB1 176.50 0.00
PB2 114.75 0.00
PB3 153.75 17.25
PB4 378.25 0.00
PB5 147.50 0.00
PB6 12.50 0.00
PB7 248.00 17.25
PB8 47.50 17.25
PB9 146.50 0.00
PB10 77.25 0.00
PB11 198.25 17.25
PB12 564.25 0.00
PB13 421.00 34.50
PB14 40.50 0.00
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,726.50
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)103.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)3.80%
Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,149.50
Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Basement Level Area x
Percent Exposed @ 3.8%
Proposed Lower Level Wall Calculations
Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
PL1 85.50 0.00
PL2 54.25 0.00
PL3 262.25 75.25
PL4 221.75 0.00
PL5 103.00 17.00
PL6 148.25 17.00
PL7 146.75 0.00
PL8 12.50 0.00
PL9 391.50 199.50
PL10 136.50 109.00
PL11 190.25 136.25
PL12 188.00 174.75
PL13 190.25 190.25
PL14 17.25 17.25
PL15 44.50 44.50
PL16 367.00 367.00
PL17 108.00 105.00
PL18 43.25 38.75
PL19 60.50 48.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,771.25
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,539.75
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)55.56%
Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,801.75
Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00
Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)491.75
Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)120.88 (500-250)/2
Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,922.63
Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Lower Level Area x
Percent Exposed @
55.56%
Proposed Main Level Wall Calculations
Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
PM1 297.75 297.75
PM2 177.25 177.25
PM3 244.25 244.25
PM4 53.50 53.50
PM5 47.75 47.75
PM6 15.50 15.50
PM7 167.50 165.75
PM8 15.50 13.75
PM9 65.00 51.75
PM10 116.00 80.50
PM11 14.25 9.75
PM12 50.25 34.00
PM13 14.25 9.75
PM14 211.25 157.25
PM15 236.25 176.50
PM16 36.50 36.50
PM17 99.00 99.00
PM18 151.00 151.00
PM19 149.00 149.00
PM20 85.00 85.00
PM21 185.25 185.25
PM22 132.50 132.50
PM23 30.50 30.50
PM24 14.75 14.75
PM25 149.00 149.00
PM26 201.50 201.50
PM27 170.00 170.00
PM28 82.50 82.50
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,212.75
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,021.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.05%
Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,890.75
Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)210.50
Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,680.25 2720.50-119.25
Main Level Countable Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
Main Level Area x Percent
Exposed @ 94.05%
Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)228.75 Exempt Front Porch
Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)778.50
Main Level Patio Floor Area (Sq Ft)461.00
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.07
Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50
Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.07
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07
Total Existing Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR
(NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08
Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50
Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable
Deck 780.50
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain
current measured floor area per the plans.
Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA)
B1B2B3B4B5B6 B12B11
B10B9
B8B7
B13B14CRAWL SPACE
9
9
4,149.50 sq ft
4
4
6
6
7
7
10
10
5
5
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
11
11
K K
L L
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL EXPOSURE
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA
98
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-011
FLOOR AREA
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
COUNTABLE
FAR PLAN LEGEND
DECK
GARAGE
EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO
BELOW
EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH
EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO
199.50 sq ft
127.50 sq ft 190.25 sq ft
84.50 sq ft 54.25 sq ft 262.25 sq ft
72.25 sq ft
221.75 sq ft
103.00 sq ft
148.25 sq ft
146.75 sq ft
12.50 sq ft109.00 sq ft
188.00 sq ft
190.25 sq ft 367.00 sq ft 17.00 sq ft17.00 sq ft108.00 sq ft
43.25 sq ft60.50 sq ft44.50 sq ft48.25 sq ft
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6
L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12
L13 L16 L17 L18 L19L14L15
257.25 sq ft
L1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8 L9 L10L11
L12L13L14
L15
L16L17L18
L19
CRAWL SPACE
491.75 sq ft
2,801.75 sq ft
9
9
4
4
6
6
7
7
10
10
5
5
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
11
11
K K
L L
Proposed Floor Area Calculations
110 Neale
Proposed Basement Level Floor Area
Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)4,149.50
Prposed Garage Level Floor Area
Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,801.75
Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00
Garage Level Patio (Exempt)257,25
Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)491.75
Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,890.75
Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)210.50
Main Level Patio (Exempt)463.25
Front Portch (Exempt)228.75
Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)778.50
Proposed "ADU" Floor Area Calculations
ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Front Portch (Exempt)0.00
FAR
Proposed Basement Level Wall Calculations
Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
PB1 176.50 0.00
PB2 114.75 0.00
PB3 153.75 17.25
PB4 378.25 0.00
PB5 147.50 0.00
PB6 12.50 0.00
PB7 248.00 17.25
PB8 47.50 17.25
PB9 146.50 0.00
PB10 77.25 0.00
PB11 198.25 17.25
PB12 564.25 0.00
PB13 421.00 34.50
PB14 40.50 0.00
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,726.50
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)103.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)3.80%
Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,149.50
Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Basement Level Area x
Percent Exposed @ 3.8%
Proposed Lower Level Wall Calculations
Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
PL1 85.50 0.00
PL2 54.25 0.00
PL3 262.25 75.25
PL4 221.75 0.00
PL5 103.00 17.00
PL6 148.25 17.00
PL7 146.75 0.00
PL8 12.50 0.00
PL9 391.50 199.50
PL10 136.50 109.00
PL11 190.25 136.25
PL12 188.00 174.75
PL13 190.25 190.25
PL14 17.25 17.25
PL15 44.50 44.50
PL16 367.00 367.00
PL17 108.00 105.00
PL18 43.25 38.75
PL19 60.50 48.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,771.25
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,539.75
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)55.56%
Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,801.75
Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00
Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)491.75
Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)120.88 (500-250)/2
Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,922.63
Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Lower Level Area x
Percent Exposed @
55.56%
Proposed Main Level Wall Calculations
Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
PM1 297.75 297.75
PM2 177.25 177.25
PM3 244.25 244.25
PM4 53.50 53.50
PM5 47.75 47.75
PM6 15.50 15.50
PM7 167.50 165.75
PM8 15.50 13.75
PM9 65.00 51.75
PM10 116.00 80.50
PM11 14.25 9.75
PM12 50.25 34.00
PM13 14.25 9.75
PM14 211.25 157.25
PM15 236.25 176.50
PM16 36.50 36.50
PM17 99.00 99.00
PM18 151.00 151.00
PM19 149.00 149.00
PM20 85.00 85.00
PM21 185.25 185.25
PM22 132.50 132.50
PM23 30.50 30.50
PM24 14.75 14.75
PM25 149.00 149.00
PM26 201.50 201.50
PM27 170.00 170.00
PM28 82.50 82.50
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,212.75
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,021.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.05%
Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,890.75
Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)210.50
Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,680.25 2720.50-119.25
Main Level Countable Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
Main Level Area x Percent
Exposed @ 94.05%
Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)228.75 Exempt Front Porch
Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)778.50
Main Level Patio Floor Area (Sq Ft)461.00
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.07
Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50
Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.07
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07
Total Existing Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR
(NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08
Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50
Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable
Deck 780.50
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain
current measured floor area per the plans.
Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA)
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL EXPOSURE
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR AREA
99
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-012
FLOOR AREA
CALCULATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
COUNTABLE
FAR PLAN LEGEND
DECK
GARAGE
EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO
BELOW
EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH
EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO15.50 sq ft13.00 sq ft297.75 sq ft
170.00 sq ft
177.25 sq ft
244.25 sq ft 49.50 sq ft 44.25 sq ft
15.50 sq ft167.50 sq ft163.00 sq ft
65.00 sq ft 116.00 sq ft
14.25 sq ft50.25 sq ft
14.00 sq ft211.25 sq ft 236.25 sq ft
36.50 sq ft 99.00 sq ft 151.00 sq ft 149.00 sq ft
85.00 sq ft 185.25 sq ft 132.50 sq ft
30.50 sq ft14.75 sq ft149.00 sq ft 201.50 sq ft
82.50 sq ft
176.50 sq ft
PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PM7 PM8 PM9 PM10
PM11 PM12 PM13 PM14 PM15 PM16 PM17 PM18 PM19
PM20 PM21 PM22 PM23 PM24 PM25 PM26 PM27 PM28
48.00 sq ft 74.00 sq ft
9.00 sq ft31.25 sq ft 8.50 sq ft149.75 sq ft
FF
2,890.75 sq ft
M1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8M9M10M11M12M13M14M15M16M17M18M19M20M21 M22M23
M24M25
M26M27
M28778.50 sq ft
416.50 sq ft
46.75 sq ft
210.50 sq ft
228.75 sq ft
9
9
4
4
6
6
7
7
10
10
5
5
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
11
11
K K
L L
RGProposed Floor Area Calculations
110 Neale
Proposed Basement Level Floor Area
Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)4,149.50
Prposed Garage Level Floor Area
Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,801.75
Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00
Garage Level Patio (Exempt)257,25
Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)491.75
Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,890.75
Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)210.50
Main Level Patio (Exempt)463.25
Front Portch (Exempt)228.75
Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)778.50
Proposed "ADU" Floor Area Calculations
ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Front Portch (Exempt)0.00
FAR
Proposed Basement Level Wall Calculations
Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
PB1 176.50 0.00
PB2 114.75 0.00
PB3 153.75 17.25
PB4 378.25 0.00
PB5 147.50 0.00
PB6 12.50 0.00
PB7 248.00 17.25
PB8 47.50 17.25
PB9 146.50 0.00
PB10 77.25 0.00
PB11 198.25 17.25
PB12 564.25 0.00
PB13 421.00 34.50
PB14 40.50 0.00
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,726.50
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)103.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)3.80%
Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,149.50
Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Basement Level Area x
Percent Exposed @ 3.8%
Proposed Lower Level Wall Calculations
Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
PL1 85.50 0.00
PL2 54.25 0.00
PL3 262.25 75.25
PL4 221.75 0.00
PL5 103.00 17.00
PL6 148.25 17.00
PL7 146.75 0.00
PL8 12.50 0.00
PL9 391.50 199.50
PL10 136.50 109.00
PL11 190.25 136.25
PL12 188.00 174.75
PL13 190.25 190.25
PL14 17.25 17.25
PL15 44.50 44.50
PL16 367.00 367.00
PL17 108.00 105.00
PL18 43.25 38.75
PL19 60.50 48.25
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,771.25
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,539.75
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)55.56%
Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations
Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,801.75
Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00
Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)491.75
Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)120.88 (500-250)/2
Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,922.63
Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Lower Level Area x
Percent Exposed @
55.56%
Proposed Main Level Wall Calculations
Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)
PM1 297.75 297.75
PM2 177.25 177.25
PM3 244.25 244.25
PM4 53.50 53.50
PM5 47.75 47.75
PM6 15.50 15.50
PM7 167.50 165.75
PM8 15.50 13.75
PM9 65.00 51.75
PM10 116.00 80.50
PM11 14.25 9.75
PM12 50.25 34.00
PM13 14.25 9.75
PM14 211.25 157.25
PM15 236.25 176.50
PM16 36.50 36.50
PM17 99.00 99.00
PM18 151.00 151.00
PM19 149.00 149.00
PM20 85.00 85.00
PM21 185.25 185.25
PM22 132.50 132.50
PM23 30.50 30.50
PM24 14.75 14.75
PM25 149.00 149.00
PM26 201.50 201.50
PM27 170.00 170.00
PM28 82.50 82.50
Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,212.75
Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,021.50
% of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.05%
Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations
Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,890.75
Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)210.50
Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,680.25 2720.50-119.25
Main Level Countable Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
Main Level Area x Percent
Exposed @ 94.05%
Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)228.75 Exempt Front Porch
Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)778.50
Main Level Patio Floor Area (Sq Ft)461.00
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.07
Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50
Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.07
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14
Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07
Total Existing Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50
Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR
(NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07
Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52
Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86
Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70
ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08
Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations
Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50
Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable
Deck 780.50
Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00
Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08
Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations
NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain
current measured floor area per the plans.
Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA)
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL EXPOSURE
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA
100
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"28'-0"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"2'-0"6'-6"3'-6"16'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"2'-0"4'-0"T.O. FF
79'-0"
T.O. SLAB
78'-9"
SIDE YARD SETBACK
S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K
REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E
MECH HALL
BATH
CLO.
BEDROOM 5
BATH
BEDROOM 6
CRAWL SPACE
1
A-2012A-2013
A-202
4A-2029
9
EXISTING EGRESS WELL TO BE
REMOVED AND RELOCATED
EXISTING EGRESS WELL TO BE
REMOVED AND RELOCATED
BEDROOM 4
4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-102X
EXISTING BASEMENT
LEVEL PLAN
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
101
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"28'-0"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"4'-0"2'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"16'-0"3'-6"6'-6"2'-0"T.O. FF
89'-7"
T.O. GARAGE LEVEL PATIO (VIF)
89'-4"
T.O. DRIVEWAY AT GARAGE (VIF)
89'-4"
FRONT PORCH ABOVE
PATIO ABOVE
EGRESS WELL TO BE REMOVED
AND RELOCATED
EGRESS WELL TO BE RECONFIGURED
UP
DN
SIDE YARD SETBACK
S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K
REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E
GARAGE
MUD
GALLERY
STUDY / BEDROOM
MEDIA
VESTIBULELAUNDRY
GUEST MASTERBATH
BATH
CRAWL SPACE
1
A-2012A-2013
A-202
4A-2029
9
NOTE: ALL INTERIOR WALLS INDICATED THIS LEVEL TO BE
RECONFIGURED TO NEW LAYOUT THAT MEETS CURRENT
EGRESS REQUIREMENTS
EGRESS WELL TO BE
REMOVED AND RELOCATED
SITE WALL TO BE REMOVED
4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL PLAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-103X
EXISTING GARAGE LEVEL
PLAN
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
102
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
FF
2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"28'-0"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"2'-0"6'-6"3'-6"16'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"2'-0"4'-0"T.O. FINISH FLOOR
100'-3"
T.O. PLY
100'-0"T.O. DECK (VIF)
100'-2"
T.O. DECK
100'-2"T.O. PATIO (VIF)
100'-2"
T.O. PATIO (VIF)
100'-2"
T.O. FINISH FLOOR
94'-8"
T.O. FRONT PORCH (VIF)
94'-6"
1
A-2012A-2013
A-202
4A-202EXISTING ROOF AND WALLS
SURROUNDING EXISTING
DECK TO BE REMOVED,
EXISTING DECK TO BE
REMOVED AND ENCLOSED
GARAGE ROOF APRON
TO BE REMOVED
EGRESS WELL TO BE REMOVED
AND RELOCATED
EGRESS WELL TO BE RECONFIGURED DN
DN
SIDE YARD SETBACK
S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K
REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E
PWDER
MASTER BATH
202
CLOSET
203
CLOSET
204
DINING ROOM
201
FAMILY ROOM
208
GREAT ROOM
209
ENTRY
210
MASTER BEDROOM
205
GREAT ROOM
209
9
9RG4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
EXISTING PATIO
TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING DECK TO
BE REFINISHED
EXISTING DECK
TO BE REMOVED
FRONT PORCH TO BE
RECONFIGURED
EXISTING ADU
TO BE REPLACED BY NEW GARAGE
SOME WALLS TO REMAIN
EGRESS WELL TO BE
REMOVED AND RELOCATED
KITCHEN
207
N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-104X
EXISTING MAIN LEVEL
PLAN
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
103
PROPOSED STANDING SEAM ROOF
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED
WITH SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
EXISTING SHAKE ROOF TO BE REFINISHED
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED
WITH STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF MATERIAL LEGEND
PROPOSED SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
122'-23/4"
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
118'-93/4"
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
118'-51/2"
EXISTING ROOFS AT THE CURRENT DINING
AND EXTERIOR DECK AREA TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING ROOFS AT THE CURRENT DINING
AND EXTERIOR DECK AREA TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING ROOFS AT THE CURRENT DINING
AND EXTERIOR DECK AREA TO BE REMOVED
13:1213:12
10:1210:124:128:12
13:1213:1210:12SIDE YARD SETBACK
S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K
REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E
9
9
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
118'-51/2"
4
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
T.O. RIDGE (VIF)
119'-93/4"
T.O. STONE CAP (VIF)
125'-5"
T.O. STONE CAP (VIF)
123'-1"
EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO
REMAIN 10:1210:1210:1210:1213:12N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING ROOF PLAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-105X
EXISTING ROOF PLAN
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
104
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"4'-111/2"23'-01/2"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"5'-0"22'-41/2"4'-0"2'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"16'-0"3'-6"6'-6"2'-0"3'-101/2"8'-101/2"T.O. FF
79'-0"
T.O. SLAB
78'-9"
43
4343
43
43
NEW
ELEVATOR
UP
PROPOSED ADDITIONPROPOSED RENOVATION
STAIR
001
STAIR
001
GYM
002
BATH
003
MECH
004
GAME ROOM
006
BEDROOM
008
BATH
005
BATH
017
BEDROOM
018
BEDROOM
020
BATH
021
HALL
022
POWDER
023
BATH
011
BEDROOM
007
VESTIBULE
019
CRAWL SPACE
CLO.
010
HALL
009
BATH
012
BATH
011
BEDROOM
014
LAUNDRY
015
MECH
016
1
A-2012A-2013
A-202
4A-2029
9
4
4
6
6
7
7
10
10
5
5
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
11
11
K K
L L
N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-102
PROPOSED BASEMENT
LEVEL PLAN
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
105
4'-0"2'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"16'-0"3'-6"6'-6"2'-0"3'-101/2"8'-101/2"2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"4'-111/2"23'-01/2"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"5'-0"22'-41/2"
T.O. FF
89'-7"
T.O. PLY
89'-4"
T.O. ENTRY PATIO
89'-7"
T.O. GARAGE SLAB
89'-4"
43
43
4343
1643
1643
PROPOSED
ELEVATOR
UP
PROPOSED ADDITIONPROPOSED RENOVATION
FRONT PORCH ABOVE
PATIO ABOVE
STAIR
101
REC ROOM
102
BEDROOM
103
BATHROOM
104
NANNY ROOM
108
BATHROOM
107
BEDROOM
110 MUDROOM
115
BATH
112 BEDROOM
113
POWDER
117
BEDROOM
119
WET ROOM
105
WC
106
BATH
111
ENTRY
118
GARAGE
120
CLOSET
114VESTIBULE
109
GARAGE
116
CLO.
120
BATH
121
CRAWL SPACE
1
A-2012A-2013
A-202
4A-2029
9
4
4
6
6
7
7
10
10
5
5
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
11
11
K K
L L
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL PLAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-103
PROPOSED GARAGE
LEVEL PLAN
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
106
FF
2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"4'-111/2"23'-01/2"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"5'-0"22'-41/2"4'-0"2'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"16'-0"3'-6"6'-6"2'-0"3'-101/2"8'-101/2"T.O. FF
100'-3"
T.O. PLY
100'-0"
T.O. PORCH FINISH
94'-33/4"
T.O. ROOF DECK FINISH
100'-3"
T.O. PROPOSED PATIO
99'-9"
T.O. PATIO
100'-3"
1
A-2012A-2013
A-202
4A-2024343
4343
43
43
43
32
PROPOSED ROOF OVER
AUTO COURT ENTRY
MOVABLE OUTDOOR
KITCHEN EQUIPMENT
PLANTER AT EDGE OF AUTO COURT, BELOW
FRONT PORCH PER RDS
PROPOSED PATIO TO BE WITHIN
30" OF FINISHED GRADE
4343
4343
43
43
32
32
PROPOSED ROOF OVER
AUTO COURT ENTRY
MOVABLE OUTDOOR
KITCHEN EQUIPMENT
PLANTER AT EDGE OF AUTO COURT, BELOW
FRONT PORCH PER RDS
PROPOSED PATIO TO BE WITHIN
30" OF FINISHED GRADE
PROPOSED PATIO
PROPOSED ROOF DECK
DW
AUTOCOURT
BELOW
PROPOSED PATIO
PROPOSED PATIO
PROPOSED ROOF DECK
DW
AUTOCOURT
BELOW
DN
PROPOSED PATIO
9
9
4
4
6
6
7
7
10
10
5
5
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
11
11
K K
L L
RGPLANTER AT ROOF DECKPLANTER AT ROOF DECK
KITCHEN
212
BREAKFAST
213
LIVING ROOM
214
DINING ROOM
202
MASTER BEDROOM
209
MASTER BATH
205
CLOSET
208
CLOSET
207
WC
206
LAUNDRY
204
STAIR
201
POWDER
203
PANTRY
211
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE DEMOLISHED
NEW WALL
WALL LEGEND
N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-104
PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL
PLAN
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
107
T.O. RIDGE
122'-23/4"
T.O. RIDGE
119'-93/4"
T.O. RIDGE
118'-51/2"
T.O. PORCH ROOF AT EDGE
101'-73/4"
T.O. PORCH ROOF AT EDGE
98'-11"
T.O. RIDGE
116'-31/4"
13:1213:12
10:1210:128:12
13:1213:1210:122:122:12 2:12 2:122:12
6:126:12SIDE YARD SETBACK
S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K
REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E
T.O. RIDGE
119'-93/4"
9
9
T.O. RIDGE
118'-51/2"
4
4
6
6
7
7
10
10
5
5
8
8
1
1
C C
B B
A A
D D
E E
F F
G G
H H
J J
2
2
3
3
I I
11
11
K K
L L
T.O. PERGOLA
111'-21/2"
T.O. CHIMNEY CAP
123'-6"
T.O. STONE CAP (VIF)
123'-1"
T.O. STONE CAP
113'-11/4"
EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO
REMAIN 10:1210:1210:1210:1213:12PROPOSED FRONT
PORCH ROOF
PROPOSED HIP ROOF
PROPOSED ROOF
EXTENSION
PROPOSED STANDING SEAM ROOF
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED
WITH SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
EXISTING SHAKE ROOF TO BE REFINISHED
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED
WITH STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF MATERIAL LEGEND
PROPOSED SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-105
PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
108
6 7 948123
28'-1"VIF10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"9'-03/4"2'-5"EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN,
EXTERIOR FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
T.O. PLATE
110'-9"
T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
100'-0"
T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
89'-4"
T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
78'-9"FRONT SETBACKMASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR
FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
ALL STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO OCCUR
TO THE RIGHT OF THE DASHED LINE
RIDGE HEIGHT
122'-23/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
119'-83/4"
12
10
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
J I H G F E D C B A
15'-71/2"VIF10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"7'-81/2"3'-91/4"EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN,
STONE AND ROOF FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
RIDGE HEIGHT
122'-23/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
118'-5 1/2"
T.O. PLATE
110'-9"
T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
100'-0"
T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
89'-4"
T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
78'-9"
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING NORTHWEST ELEVATION
0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING NORTHEAST ELEVATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-201X
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
109
8 69 4 3 2 17
10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"9'-03/4"2'-5"EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN,
STONE AND ROOF FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
ADU TO BE REMOVED, SOME WALLS TO REMAIN
ROOF FINISH TO BE REPLACED WITH STANDING SEAM METAL
NEW EXTERIOR DOORS TO ACCESS
NEW PATIO AT GRADE
21
20
21
18
T.O. PLATE
110'-9"
T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
100'-0"
T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
89'-4"
T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
78'-9"FRONT SETBACK12
10
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13FRONT SETBACKMASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR
FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
ALL STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO OCCUR
TO THE LEFT OF THE DASHED LINE
RIDGE HEIGHT
122'-23/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
119'-83/4"
A B C D E F G H I J
10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"9'-03/4"2'-5"32'-103/4"VIFT.O. PLATE
110'-9"
T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
100'-0"
T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
89'-4"
T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
78'-9"
RIDGE HEIGHT
122'-23/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
119'-83/4"
12
10
12
10
12
10
0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING SOUTHEAST ELEVATION
0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"4 EXISTING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-202X
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
110
5 6 7 94 108123 11
10'-7"4'-93/4"5'-101/4"10'-9"5'-61/4"3'-61/2"2'-5"7'-0"ENTRY DOOR HEIGHT14'-111/2"28'-1"VIF17
21
19
20
EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN,
EXTERIOR FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
56
23
15
13
14
56
23
12
10
11
48
35
36
09
08
20
21
18
RIDGE HEIGHT
122'-23/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
119'-83/4"
T.O. PLATE
110'-9"
T.O. PLY AT MAIN LEVEL
100'-0"
T.O. PLY AT GARAGE LEVEL
89'-4"
T.O. SLAB AT BASEMENT
78'-9"FRONT SETBACKMASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR
FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
ALL STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO OCCUR
TO THE RIGHT OF THE DASHED LINE
T.O. SLAB AT FRONT PORCH
94'-13/4"
12
13
12
10
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
2
12
2
RIDGE HEIGHT
113'-31/4"
L K J I H G F E D C B A
10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"7'-81/2"3'-91/4"21
20
17
23
19
21
23
EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN,
STONE AND ROOF FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
T.O. PLATE
110'-9"
T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
100'-0"
T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
89'-4"
T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
78'-9"
RIDGE HEIGHT
122'-23/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
119'-83/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
118'-51/2"
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED NORTHWEST ELEVATION
0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED NORTHEAST ELEVATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-201
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
111
8 611109 5 4 3 2 17
2'-6"3'-2"10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"5'-61/4"2'-21/4"1'-41/4"2'-5"17
21
19
20
EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN,
STONE AND ROOF FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
56
23
53
STEEL SHADE STRUCTURE,
> 50% OPEN TO ABOVE
NEW EXTERIOR DOORS TO ACCESS
NEW PATIO AT GRADE
21
20
21
3131
20
18
T.O. PLATE
110'-9"
T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
100'-0"
T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
89'-4"
T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
78'-9"FRONT SETBACKRIDGE HEIGHT
122'-23/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
119'-83/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
118'-51/2"12
10
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13
12
13FRONT SETBACKMASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR
FINISHES TO BE REPLACED
ALL STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO OCCUR
TO THE LEFT OF THE DASHED LINE
RIDGE HEIGHT
116'-31/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
122'-23/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
119'-83/4"
A B C D E F G H I J K L
10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"9'-03/4"2'-5"8'-0"30'-23/4"2'-5"13
14
15
17
21
19
20
23
3131
48
23
53
35
49
36
36
08
20
21
36
T.O. PLATE
110'-9"
T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
100'-0"
T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
89'-4"
T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE
78'-9"
RIDGE HEIGHT
122'-23/4"
RIDGE HEIGHT
119'-83/4"
12
10
12
10
12
10
12
10
0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED SOUTHEAST ELEVATION
0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"4 PROPOSED SOUTHWEST ELEVATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1
NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG
SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12
SERIES OF 2013
UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER
26.575.020.E.5.k
ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g
PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1
WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C
R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25'
CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING
CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a
EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD
1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE
FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
NEW STONE COLUMN BASE
INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION
FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD
WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD
WINDOW TRIM TBD
CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH
MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF
ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e
EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP
LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310
LIFE + SAFETY
WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH
LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW
AC UNITS
GAS + ELECTRIC METERS
NEW TIMBER COLUMN
HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34"
GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT
POINT LOAD PER 301.5
EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN
WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP
GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF
FORCE TO OPEN; TYP
GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC
R302.6; TYP
SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE
ROOF OVERHANG
SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION
ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION
EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF
BUILT-IN MILLWORK
RADON VENT PIPE
SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE
DOWNSPOUT
EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP
GUTTER
EXISTING GRADE
STONE CHIMNEY CAP
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD
EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD
PATIO MATERIAL TBD
DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD
DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT
SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2
GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2
OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS
26.410.030.D.1.D.2
FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C
ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C
NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C
LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C
BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C
LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW
PROPOSED GRADE
STUCCO TBD
RETAINING WALL
EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7
LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION
LINE OF ROOF ABOVE
MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE
PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1
INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2
WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER
26.575.020.E.5.t
STONE PLANTER
COPYRIGHT
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-202
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
7/7/20
FOR UMPHI
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
05/01/20
07/07/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL
112
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-203
STREETSCAPE
ELEVATIONS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
56'-3"15'-3"6'-9"5'-51/8"15'-103/4"78'-3"
HISTORIC RESOURCE
114 NEALE AVE INTERSECTION OFPROPERTY LINE AT STREETALL ABOVE GRADE WORK TOOCCUR TO THE RIGHT OF THE RED LINEPROJECT SITE
110 NEALE AVE
25' HEIGHT LIMIT
56'-3"15'-3"6'-11"7'-33/4"6'-55/8"
78'-3"INTERSECTION OFPROPERTY LINE AT STREETHISTORIC RESOURCE
114 NEALE AVE
PROJECT SITE
110 NEALE AVE
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED NEALE AVE ELEVATION
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING NEALE AVE ELEVATION
113
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-204
PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR
VIEWS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
1 NEALE STREET ELEVATION
114
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-205
PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR
VIEWS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
1 NORTH VIEW
2 EAST VIEW
115
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
A-206
PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR
VIEWS
7/7/20
KP, BF
1911.00
ASPEN, CO 81611
110 NEALE AVE
17 QUEEN LLC
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX
ID NAME ISSUED DATE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20
CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20
HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20
1 WEST VIEW
2 SOUTH VIEW
116
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 2020
Chairperson Greenwood opened the meeting at 4:30 p.m.
Commissioners in attendance: Jeffrey Halferty, Kara Thompson, Roger Moyer, Scott Kendrick,
Sherri Sanzone, Gretchen Greenwood.
Commissioners not in attendance: Bob Blaich,
Staff present:
Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer
Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner
Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney
Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Halferty moved to approve the minutes from June 24th,2020.
Ms. Thompson seconded. All in favor. Motion carried 6-0.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: None
CONFLICTS: Ms. Thompson has a conflict of interest with 110 Neal ave. and will not
participate in the conversation. Mr. Halferty has a conflict of interest with 500 W main and will
not participate in the conversation.
STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon stated that at this point there is no project motoring, call up
reports, or certificates of negative effects.
Ms. Thompson left the meeting
OLD BUSINESS: 110 Neale Avenue – Conceptual Major Development Review. Steve Wilson
with Forumphi representing owners.
Mr. Wilson reminded the commission that this project is a historic lot split and the historic
resource is on the lot above the project. He showed updated renderings of the proposed plan and
stated that the revised design reduces the roof mass at the center of the structure to create a lower
connector element. Mr. Wilson stated at the last hearing HPC had a question about what trees
were staying and which were going to be lost. He showed a map of trees that will not be affected
and the ones that will be lost. Mr. Wilson stated that they have been working with the Parks
Dept. on this tree issue. Mr. Wilson showed the new proposal renderings from all sides to
showcase the elevation, he pointed out that there is no obstruction in the view plane of the
historic resource on the hill. Mr. Wilson reiterated that the redesign was significantly smaller and
without adding unneeded complexity.
Mr. Kendrick asked how much was the roof lowered.
Mr. Wilson stated that they diminished the roof by 4 feet.
STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Yoon reminded the commission that this was a historic lot split and
the historic resource does not sit on this lot. She further explained that they will be looking at the
117
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 2020
connecting element to the new addition which is next to the historic resource. Ms. Yoon stated
that staff had concerns with the relatability with mass and scale of the new addition as it related
to the historic lot. Ms. Yoon stated that the new iteration respects 11.3 in creating a scale and
proportion in relation to the historic resource. She said that the staff is in favor of the updated
plan. Ms. Yoon stated that other City departments have submitted comments and concerns to the
commission. Ms. Yoon reviewed the conditions for this project, that the applicant needs to work
with city staff and departments.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Ann Short neighbor of the project submitted a letter. Attached to the
minutes.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Ms. Greenwood stated that she like the redesign of the
massing and is in favor of moving this project forward.
Ms. Sanzone agreed with Ms. Greenwood's comments.
Mr. Halferty stated that he was not at the first meeting but supports this project moving forward.
Mr. Moyer asked about the covenants the neighbors agreed to.
Ms. Bryan stated that the city does not get involved in these kinds of issues.
Mr. Moyer stated that he agrees with everyone's comments and would like to see this move
forward.
Mr. Kendrick stated no comment.
Mr. Halferty moved to approve Resolution #15-2020. Ms. Sanzone seconded.
ROLL CALL: Mr. Halferty, Yes; Mr. Moyer, Yes; Mr. Kendrick Yes; Ms. Sanzone, Yes; Ms.
Greenwood, Yes. All in favor, Motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Halferty left the meeting
Ms. Thompson joined the meeting.
OLD BUSINESS: 500 W. Main Street – Conceptual Major Development and Residential
Design Standards Review. John Broughton of Rowland + Broughton representing the project.
Mr. Rowland stated that this property was a lot split on one half there sits the historic storefront
and the other is a garden where the new addition will be located. Mr. Rowland stated that their
mission was to build a cute single-family home on the adjacent lot. Mr. Rowland showed historic
photos and Sanborn maps of what the lot looked like and then he showed new renderings of the
proposed project. Mr. Broughton stated that the lot is thirty feet wide and one hundred thirty feet
deep, he added that there will be ten-foot setbacks on the front and back with five-foot setbacks
on the sides. Mr. Broughton stated that the structure will be twenty-five feet tall with a carved
out front entry with a gable form. He explained that the carved-out portion will be placed on the
back of the building. Mr. Broughton showed models to showcase the mass and scale of the
proposed project next to the historic resource.
Ms. Thompson asked if the applicant could discuss the porch and garage design.
Mr. Broughton stated that the porch has a significant amount of planter boxes built-in and said
by code they will need to extend it by one foot. He said the garage door will be designed to
reflect a more historic feel. Mr. Broughton said that the garage door will be a signal panel.
Ms. Greenwood asked about the residential design and standards and if there was another
vernation being asked for.
118
HPC Resolution 15, Series of 2020
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION #15, SERIES OF 2020
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 110 NEALE AVENUE, LOT 2 AS SHOWN ON THE
SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT OF 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT
SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT
BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO
PARCEL ID: 2737-073-83-002
WHEREAS, the applicant, 17 Queen LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, LLC, has
requested HPC approval for Conceptual Major Development for the property located at 110 Neale
Avenue, Lot 2 as shown on the Subdivision Exemption Plat of 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot
Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The project has received administrative approval
of compliance with the Residential Design Standards; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure
shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a
designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted
to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures
established for their review;” and
WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application,
a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s
conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section
26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC
may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain
additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and
WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for
compliance with applicable review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and
WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on June 24th, 2020 and July 22nd, 2020. HPC considered
the application, the staff memo and public comment, and found the proposal consistent with the
review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 5 - 0.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development for 110 Neale Avenue, Lot 2, as shown
on the Subdivision Exemption Plat of 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of
Aspen, CO as follows:
Section 1: Conceptual Major Development Review
HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development as proposed with the following conditions:
1.) Continue to work with all relevant City Departments including Engineering, Parks, and
Zoning to ensure all requirements are met, including but not limited to the proposed
right-of-way configuration.
119
HPC Resolution 15, Series of 2020
Page 2 of 2
2.) A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one
(1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an
application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the
Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole
discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for
a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written
request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date.
Section 2: Material Representations
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation
Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development
approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by
other specific conditions or an authorized authority.
Section 3: Existing Litigation
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 4: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 22nd day of July, 2020.
Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content:
______________________________ ______________________________
Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Gretchen Greenwood, Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________
Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk
120
Page 1 of 2
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council
THROUGH: Phillip Supino, Community Development Director
FROM: Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer
MEMO DATE: August 17, 2020
MEETING DATE: April 25, 2020
RE: Notice of Call Up, HPC approval for 500 W. Main Street- Conceptual Major
Development Review and Residential Design Standards Review, Resolution #16,
Series of 2020
APPLICANT/OWNER:
500 West Main Street, LLC
REPRESENTATIVE:
Rowland + Broughton
LOCATION:
Street Address:
500 W. Main Street (address of
new home TBD)
Legal Description:
Lot R, Mesa Subdivision, City and
Townsite of Aspen, Colorado
Parcel Identification Number:
PID# 2735-124-43-008
CURRENT ZONING AND USE:
MU, Mixed Use.
Vacant, used as a garden
PROPOSED ZONING AND USE:
MU, Mixed Use
Single-family home
PROCESS SUMMARY: Certain land use approvals granted by
HPC or P&Z require that Council be notified of the decision through
a brief staff summary. The notification is not a public hearing and
no applicant presentation or public comment has been accepted in
the past. During the Call Up Notice, City Council may uphold the
HPC or P&Z decision. Alternatively, Council may request more
detailed information be provided through a presentation by staff
and the applicant at a future meeting. After hearing the additional
project description, Council may uphold the boards’ decision or
may remand it to require reconsideration of specific issues at a new
public hearing. HPC’s or P&Z’s decision on remand shall be final.
BACKGROUND: On July 22nd, by a 5-0 vote, HPC approved a
proposal to construct a home on a vacant 3,000 square foot lot.
The property is currently used as a garden, associated with
Rowland+Broughton’s office. While approval was granted in 2018
to remove all development rights from the site via Transferable
Development Rights, the applicant is not required to do so and has
elected to build a home instead, shown in the center of the image
below. HPC granted Conceptual approval with a condition that the
front porch and upper deck be restudied for greater compatibility
with neighboring buildings at Final review.
121
Page 2 of 2
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff and HPC supported the project with conditions appropriate to a Final review hearing. Staff
recommends Council uphold the decision.
Recommended Motion
“I move to uphold HPC’s approval for 500 W. Main Street- Conceptual Major Development Review and
Residential Design Standards Review.”
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________.
EXHIBITS:
A – Staff memo to HPC
B – Approved Plans
C – Draft HPC meeting minutes, July 22, 2020
D – Draft HPC Resolution
122
Page 1 of 3
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
Memorandum
TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer
MEETING DATE: July 22, 2020
RE: 500 W. Main Street – Conceptual Major Development and Residential Design
Standards Review- PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM JUNE 10TH
APPLICANT /OWNER:
500 West Main Street, LLC
REPRESENTATIVE:
Rowland + Broughton
LOCATION:
Street Address:
500 W. Main Street (address of
new home TBD)
Legal Description:
Lot R, Mesa Subdivision, City and
Townsite of Aspen, Colorado
Parcel Identification Number:
PID# 2735-124-43-008
CURRENT ZONING & USE
MU (Mixed Use)
Vacant, used as a garden
PROPOSED ZONING & USE:
MU (Mixed Use)
Single-family home
SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval for Conceptual Major
Development and Residential Design Standards Review for a new
home on a lot created through a historic landmark lot split. The
property is currently used as a garden, associated with
Rowland+Broughton’s office. While approval was granted to
remove all development rights from the site via Transferable
Development Rights, the applicant is not required to do so and
has elected to build a home on the site instead. A hearing was
initially scheduled for this project on June 10th, but the applicant
requested a continuance. HPC did not conduct any review at that
meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the project, with the
condition that for Final Review, a minor restudy of the front
porch/second floor deck, and the garage door design be
undertaken to comply fully with the Residential Design
Standards.
Site Locator Map – 500 W. Main Street, Lot R
123
Page 2 of 3
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals:
• Major Development (Section 26.415.070.D) for Conceptual design approval.
• Residential Design Standards Variations (26.410.020.D Variation Review Standards) related to
Articulation of Building Mass, One-story Element and Garage Door Design. Please note that
while properties containing historic resources are exempt from Residential Design Standards
review, development of this vacant lot requires compliance or variations.
The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority, however this project is subject
to Call-up Notice to City Council.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff finds that the historic preservation design guidelines are all met by this project, and the proposed
building is a good fit for the context. Staff supports a variation from the Articulation of Building Mass
standard in the interest of restricting the project to a one-story mass near the adjacent miner’s cottage.
Staff recommends the project be adjusted to meet the One-story Element and Garage Door Design
standards.
Please see Exhibits A, B and C for more detail.
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
The application was referred out to other City departments who have requirements that will significantly
affect the permit review. Relevant conditions of approval are included in the recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission grant Conceptual Major Development,
Relocation and Residential Design Standards approval with the following conditions:
1. A variation from the Building Articulation requirement of the Residential Design Standards is
granted.
2. The project must be adjusted to comply with the One-story Element and Garage Door Design
requirements of the Residential Design Standards.
3. Coordination with the Engineering Department is needed on the following topics:
• If the sidewalk curb in gutter in front of the site are not new, the property will be required to
replace them per City of Aspen standards.
• In order for the drywell on Lot S to be used to treat stormwater from Lot R, drainage
easements, maintenance agreements and access to the infrastructure will need to be
addressed.
4. Coordination with the Building Department is needed on the following topics:
124
Page 3 of 3
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
• Due to the proximity of the house to the egress stair on the west side of the office structure,
the east wall of the new house must have a 1 hour fire rating on both sides of the wall.
• Windows on this wall may need to be fire-rated, or a sprinkler system installed.
• Additional fire-proof construction may be needed adjacent to the transformer in the
northwest corner of the site.
5. Coordination with the Parks Department is needed on the following topics:
• During construction, to protect the cottonwood street trees, the front yard, up to the 10’
setback, must be barricaded with a 6’ fence with an attached fabric liner. A mulch bedding
may be required.
• The water line will need to be located as far east as possible to protect the street trees.
• Parks will need to consult on sidewalk, curb and gutter replacement, if they are to occur.
6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year
of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application
within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development
Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown,
grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval
for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty
(30) days prior to the expiration date.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution #____, Series of 2020
Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria /Staff Findings
Exhibit B – Residential Design Standards Criteria /Staff Findings
Exhibit C – Application
Exhibit D – Public Comment
125
Page 1 of 4
Exhibit A
Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria
Staff Findings
26.415.070.D Major Development. No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed,
enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property
located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the
Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for
their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order.
3. Conceptual Development Plan Review
b) The procedures for the review of conceptual development plans for major development
projects are as follows:
1) The Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for
conceptual or final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the
applicant will be notified in writing of this and a public hearing before the HPC shall be
scheduled. Notice of the hearing shall be provided pursuant to Section 26.304.060.E.3
Paragraphs a, b and c.
2) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's
conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This
report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a
recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons
for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the
evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic
Preservation Design Guidelines.
3) The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain
additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny.
4) A resolution of the HPC action shall be forwarded to the City Council in accordance with Section
26.415.120 - Appeals, notice to City Council, and call-up. No applications for Final Development
Plan shall be accepted by the City and no associated permits shall be issued until the City Council
takes action as described in said section.
Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines:
1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block,
neighborhood or district.
• Building footprint and location should reinforce the traditional patterns of the neighborhood.
126
Page 2 of 4
• Allow for some porosity on a site. In a residential project, setback to setback development is
typically uncharacteristic of the historic context. Do not design a project which leaves no useful
open space visible from the street.
1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces.
• Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a
semi-public walkway, to a semi private entry feature, to private spaces.
1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on
residential projects.
• Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of
the period of significance.
• Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install
them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example on an Aspen
Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light grey concrete,
brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks.
• The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential
properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property.
1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site.
• Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather
than many small unusable areas.
• Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building.
1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process.
• When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better
integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at
least a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be
reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal.
• Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the
historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site,
reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and increase infiltration into the ground.
Stormwater facilities and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual
impact when viewed from the public right of way.
• Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements.
127
Page 3 of 4
11.1 Orient the new building to the street.
• Aspen Victorian buildings should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional
grid pattern.
• AspenModern alignments shall be handled case-by-case.
• Generally, do not set the new structure forward of the historic resource. Alignment of their
front setbacks is preferred. An exception may be made on a corner lot or where a recessed
siting for the new structure is a better preservation outcome.
11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front
porch.
• The front porch shall be functional, and used as the means of access to the front door.
• A new porch must be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally.
11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale and proportion with the historic buildings
on a parcel.
• Subdivide larger masses into smaller “modules” that are similar in size to the historic buildings
on the original site.
• Reflect the heights and proportions that characterize the historic resource.
11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building.
• The primary plane of the front shall not appear taller than the historic structure.
11.6 Design a new structure to be recognized as a product of its time.
• Consider these three aspects of a new building; form, materials, and fenestration. A project
must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from
the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design
response.
• When choosing to relate to building form, use forms that are similar to the historic resource.
• When choosing to relate to materials, use materials that appear similar in scale and finish to
those used historically on the site and use building materials that contribute to a traditional
sense of human scale
• When choosing to relate to fenestration, use windows and doors that are similar in size and
shape to those of the historic resource.
128
Page 4 of 4
11.7 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged.
• This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings.
• Overall, details shall be modest in character.
Staff Finding: The applicable chapters of the design guidelines are as follows: Site Planning and
Landscape Design, and New Buildings on Landmarked Properties.
Staff finds that the guidelines are all met. The new home sits between two historic resources; on the
east is the substantial false-front building that houses the applicant’s architecture firm and on the west
is a miner’s cottage which is part of an affordable housing development.
The architect has designed the new home to align with the face of the miner’s cottage. The landscaped
front yard is appropriate to the residential context on this end of Main Street. Stormwater needs are
proposed to be addressed through an existing drywell developed for the office building.
The new house meets the setback requirements and includes the two required on-site parking spaces.
The first floor plate aligns with the adjacent buildings, and the front porches create a strong relationship
between the buildings.
The second floor of the new home is recessed slightly to reduce the two story form’s presence next to
the one story miner’s cottage. The house features a gable roof, like the surrounding buildings and the
ridge height is lower than theirs. The preliminary material palette includes lap siding, typical of the
neighborhood.
Staff finds that the design guidelines are met and the proposed building is a good fit for the context.
129
Page 1 of 5
Exhibit B
Residential Design Standards Criteria
Staff Findings
26.410.020.D Variation Review Standards. An application requesting a variation from the Residential
Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variation, if granted
would:
1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated
in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section
26.410.010.A.1-3; or
2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints.
The proposed design would require variations from the Articulation of Building Mass, One-story
Element and Garage standards listed below.
B. Location and Massing.
1. Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible).
a) Applicability. This standard shall apply to all lots except:
(1) Lots outside of the Aspen Infill Area.
b) Intent. This standard seeks to reduce the overall perceived mass and bulk of buildings on a
property as viewed from all sides. Designs should promote light and air access between
adjacent properties. Designs should articulate building walls by utilizing multiple forms to
break up large expansive wall planes. Buildings should include massing and articulation that
convey forms that are similar in massing to historic Aspen residential buildings. This standard
is critical in the Infill Area where small lots, small side and front setbacks, alleys and historic
Aspen building forms are prevalent. Designs should change the plane of a building’s sidewall,
step a primary building’s height down to one-story in the rear portion or limit the overall
depth of the structure.
c) Standard. A principal building shall articulate building mass to reduce bulk and mass and
create building forms that are similar in scale to those seen in historic Aspen residential
buildings.
d) Options. Fulfilling at least one of the following options shall satisfy this standard:
1. Maximum Sidewall Depth. A principal building shall be no greater than fifty (50) feet in
depth, as measured from the front-most wall of the front façade to the rear wall. An
accessory building that is completely separated from the main building is permitted.
130
Page 2 of 5
Garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for an
accessory building. See Figure 5.
2. Off-set with One-Story Ground Level Connector. A principal building shall provide a
portion of its mass as a subordinate one-story, ground floor connecting element. The
connecting element shall be at least ten (10) feet in length and shall be setback at least
an additional five (5) feet from the sidewall on both sides of the building. The connecting
element shall occur at a maximum of forty-five (45) feet in depth, as measured from the
front-most wall of the front façade to the rear wall. Accessible outdoor space over the
connecting element (e.g. a deck) is permitted but may not be covered or enclosed. Any
railing for an accessible outdoor space over a connecting element must be the minimum
reasonably necessary to provide adequate safety and building code compliance and the
railing must be 50% or more transparent. See Figure 6.
131
Page 3 of 5
3. Increased Side Setbacks at Rear and Step Down. A principal building shall provide
increased side setbacks at the rear of the building. If the principal building is two stories,
it shall step down to one story in the rear. The increased side setbacks and one story step
down shall occur at a maximum of forty-five (45) feet, as measured from the front-most
wall toward the rear wall. The increased side setbacks shall be at least five (5) feet greater
than the side setbacks at the front of the building. See Figure 7.
4. One-story Element (Flexible).
a. Applicability. This standard shall apply to all lots except:
1. Lots with a required front yard setback of at least ten (10) vertical feet above or
below street grade.
b. Intent. This standard seeks to establish human scale building features as perceived
from the street and express lower and upper floors on front façades to reduce
perceived mass. Designs should utilize street-facing architectural elements, such as
porches, that imitate those of historic Aspen residential buildings. Buildings should
provide visual evidence or demarcation of the stories of a building to relate to
pedestrians. This standard is important in all areas of the city. Front porches or
portions of the front-most wall of the front façade should clearly express a one-story
scale as perceived from the street. Changes in material or color can also be
incorporated into these elements to help to strengthen the establishment of a one-
story scale.
132
Page 4 of 5
c. Standard. A principal building shall incorporate a one-story element on the front
façade. Duplexes in a side-by-side configuration are required to have a one-story
element per dwelling unit.
d. Options.
1. Projecting One-Story Element. The front
façade of the principal building shall have a
one-story street-facing element that
projects at least six (6) feet from the front
façade and has a width equivalent to at least
twenty percent (20%) of the building's (or
unit’s) overall width. This one story element
may be enclosed living space or a front
porch that is open on three sides. This one
story element shall be a minimum of 50 square feet in area.
Accessible space (whether it is a deck, porch or enclosed area) shall not be allowed
over the first story element; however, accessible space over the remaining first story
elements on the front façade shall not be precluded. See Figure 10.
2. Loggia. The front façade of the principal
building shall have an open loggia that is
recessed at least six (6) feet but no more than
ten (10) feet from the front façade, and has a
width equivalent to at least twenty percent
(20%) of the building’s (or unit’s) overall width.
The loggia shall be open on at least two (2)
sides and face the street. This one story
element shall be a minimum of 50 square feet
in area. See Figure 11.
C. Garages.
4. Garage Door Design (Flexible).
a) Applicability. This standard applies to all residential development in the city that is subject to
the Residential Design Standards.
b) Intent. This standard seeks to promote a streetscape that maximizes visual interest by
minimizing unarticulated expanses of garage doors. Garage doors that utilize increased
articulation, changes in façade depth and profile of materials, windows and other features to
break up the garage door should be prioritized. This standard is critical for any property
where garage doors are visible from the street.
Figure 10
Figure 11
133
Page 5 of 5
c) Standard. A garage door that is visible from a street or alley shall utilize an articulation
technique to break up its façade.
d) Options. Fulfilling one of the following options shall satisfy this standard:
(1) Two Separate Doors. A two-car garage door shall be
constructed as two separate doors. See Figure 18.
(2) Appearance of Two Separate Doors. A two-car garage
door shall be constructed with one door that is designed
to appear as two separate doors by incorporating a vertical
separating element that is at least one (1) foot in width.
Staff Finding: The house is a rectangular footprint that occupies the entire building envelope. The
second floor of the building has reduced mass at the front and rear of the building.
The design does not create a break in the sidewalls in the manner required to meet the Articulation of
Building Mass standard, but it does meet the intent of the standard by maintaining a one story height at
the ends of the building where the structure interfaces with the public. Staff finds that the upper floor
setback as designed is a successful response to the adjacent miner’s cottage. If the upper floor was
brought forward, the design would come close to meeting the option to have an unbroken mass that is
no more than 50’ in length as measured from the frontmost wall (it would be 52’ in length), but again,
staff finds that would be counterproductive to creating a sympathetic relationship to the one adjacent
story historic building. In this case, any one-story step down is best located at the front of the structure.
Staff supports a variation to this standard.
Regarding the requirement for a One-story Element, the project features a porch, which is appropriate,
but some of the usable deck space on top of the porch makes it non-compliant with the language of this
design standard. The applicant could pull their usable deck back approximately 1’, and/or reconfigure
it so that it does not sit on any part of the required width (20% of the front façade), depth (6’) or minimum
square footage (50 square feet) of the porch below it. Staff recommends the applicant adjust the
design to comply with this standard.
The proposed design does not meet the Garage Door Design standard, which requires that a two stall
door be designed to at least appear to be a pair of single stall doors. Staff recommends the applicant
adjust the design to comply with this standard.
Figure 18
134
135
136
X SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
WWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WGGGGGGGGG
G
SSSSSSSSSSSS
UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEE
EN 15°44'11" ES 7
4
°
1
5
'
1
6
"
E
3
0
.
0
0
'S 15°44'15" W 100.00'(N 14°50'49" E(S 7
5
°
0
9
'
1
1
"
E
3
0
.
0
0
'
)(S 14°50'49" W 100.00')FOURTH STREETMAIN
S
T
R
E
E
T
CO 100.01'100.00')FOUND No.5
REBAR, BENT
(S 7
5
°
0
9
'
1
1
"
E
3
0
.
0
0
'
)
S 7
4
°
1
5
'
2
3
"
E
3
0
.
0
0
'
SET No.5 REBAR
w/YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP LS38215
SET No.5 REBAR
w/1.25in. YELLOW
PLASTIC CAP LS23875
SET No.5 REBAR w/ORANGE
PLASTIC CAP LS38215
30.00' W.C.
N 7
4
°
1
5
'
5
2
"
W
6
0
.
0
0
'
(N 7
5
°
0
9
'
1
1
"
W
6
0
.
0
0
'
)
SET 1in. BRASS
TACK LS38215
SITE BENCHMARK
ELEV:7918.44 (S 14°50'49" W 100.00')S 15°44'08" W 100.00'A
B
Parcel No.
2735-124-43-008
3,000 Sq. Ft.
3,000 Sq. Ft.
LOT R
LOT S
1 inch = ft.
(IN U.S. SURVEY FEET)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0010 5 10 20 40
10
VICINITY MAP BYNO.DATEBYPROJECT NO.REVISIONHIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.PHONE (970) 945-8676 - FAX (970) 945-2555www.hceng.comdrawn by:checked by:date:file:1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601SHEET NUMBERSECTION -TOWNSHIP -RANGE -2201026
1 of 1Rowland+Broughton500 West Main StreetImprovement Survey PlatMesa SubdivisionCity of Aspen, ColoradoGEBBWAB05.19.20201210S84WNOTES
1.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: SEPTEMBER 7, 2018, MARCH 1, 2019 AND MAY 5, 2020.
2.THE ASSUMED BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S74°15'23"E ALONG THE NORTHERLY
BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN "A" A SET REBAR AND YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS 23875 AND "B" THE NORTHEAST
CORNER A FOUND REBAR AS SHOWN HEREON. ALL DISTANCES ARE GROUND DISTANCES BASED ON A
COMBINED SCALE FACTOR.
3.THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR OF THE BOUNDARY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON TO DETERMINE:
A) OWNERSHIP OF THE TRACT OF LAND
B) COMPATIBILITY OF THIS DESCRIPTION WITH THOSE OF ADJOINERS
C) RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PARCEL.
4.DUE TO INSUFFICIENT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF SURVEY MONUMENTATION CONTROLLING THE BOUNDARY
LOCATIONS OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL OF LAND, A GRANT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT WAS UTILIZED
CONFORMING TO THE EXISTING RECOVERED AND VALIDATED SURVEY MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON AND
PRESERVING THE GEOMETRY OF THE ORIGINAL LOTTED PARCEL.
5.FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, HIGH COUNTRY
ENGINEERING, INC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. PCT24641W ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE DATE: DECEMBER 28, 2016 AT 8:00 AM. THIS BOUNDARY IS SUBJECT TO ALL
CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.
6.THE CLIENT DID NOT REQUEST ANY ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS BE
RESEARCHED OR SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.
7.ALL DIMENSIONS AND COURSES ARE AS MEASURED IN THE FIELD UNLESS DENOTED IN PARENTHESES, WHICH
DENOTE THE BOUNDARIES OF RECORD ON THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF ASPEN TOWNSITE IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS
OF PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO.
8.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). SITE
BENCHMARK OF 1-INCH BRASS TACK HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7918.44.
9.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.
10.ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR
LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO
SECTION 18-4-508 OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES.
11.NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN
THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY
ACTION BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF
CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
12.NOTICE: THIS PLAT AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL OR
EXTENDED PURPOSE BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND MAY NOT BE USED BY ANY PARTIES
OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS DOCUMENT AND THE WORK IT REPRESENTS IS THE
PROPERTY OF HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE STORED,
REPRODUCED, DISTRIBUTED OR USED TO PREPARE DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION. AN ORIGINAL SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED TO VALIDATE THIS DOCUMENT AND IS
EXCLUSIVE TO HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. AND THE OWNER(S) OF RECORD AS OF THIS DATE, OF THE
BOUNDARY DELINEATED HEREON AND THE SUBJECT OF THE SURVEY. THIS PLAT IS RESTRICTED TO THE
INTENT OF TITLE 38, ARTICLE 50, §101, 5 (a) AND (b) C.R.S.
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT
A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISED OF LOTS R AND S, BLOCK 30, CITY OF ASPEN TOWNSITE
BEING A PART OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
I, BILL W.A. BAKER, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO (#23875) DO BY
THESE PRESENTS CERTIFY THAT THE DRAWING SHOWN HEREON, WITH NOTES ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A
PART HEREOF, REPRESENTS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, AN ACCURATE DEPICTION OF SAID SURVEY IS RENDERED
BY THIS PLAT. THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, IS
NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH TITLE
38-51-102, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES.
BILL W.A. BAKER, COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #23875
CERTIFIED FEDERAL SURVEYOR #1699OSWGG
E
E
UE UE UE
G G G
SS SS SS
W W W
CO
LEGEND
Site Location
137
DNUP
DN
UP UP
UP DN
DN
PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL EXPOSED WALL CALCULATIONS
WALL LABEL EXPOSED WALL AREA (SFTOTAL WALL AREA (SF)
1 - EAST WALL
PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
MAIN LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SF)
GARAGE GROSS FLOOR AREA (SF)
GARAGE FLOOR AREA EXEMPTION (SF)
MAIN LEVEL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SF)
1,388
412
331
1,057
412 - 250 = 162
= (976+81)
TOTAL PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
BASEMENT FLOOR AREA (SF)
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SF)
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SF)
30
768
1057
TOTAL PROPOSED FLOOR AREA (SF) 1,862
DECK/PORCH AREA CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DECK/PORCH AREA (SF)
MAIN LEVEL ENTRY PATIO (SF)
286
279
< 279 SF ALLOWABLE
< 1,862 SF ALLOWABLE
PROPOSED AREA CONSTRAINTS
LOT AREA (SF)
MAX ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA (SF)
MAX ALLOWABLE DECK AREA (SF)
3,000
1,862
279 15% * 1,862
DECK/PORCH FLOOR AREA (SF)7
FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
ROOF DECK BONUS (SF)
7
2 - NORTH WALL
3 - SOUTH WALL
4 - WEST WALL
787.50 0
194.25 0
194.25 0
787.50 44
OVERALL TOTAL WALL AREA (SF) 1,963.50
EXPOSED WALL AREA (SF)44
% OF EXPOSED WALL (EXPOSED/TOTAL) 2.24%
BASEMENT TOTALS
PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
BASEMENT GROSS FLOOR AREA (SF)
BASEMENT COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SF)
1,326
30 1,326 * 2.24%
(162 @ 50%) = 81+250= 331
PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS
UPPER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SF)
UPPER LEVEL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SF)
768
768
81GARAGE COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SF)= 412 - 331
ROOF DECK FAR (SF)
0
= (976+412)
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SF)976
= (976+81)
= (279-286)
976 SF
FLOOR AREA GARAGE
412 GSF
81 CSF
COVERED ENTRY PORCH768 SF
FLOOR AREA
175 SF
DECK AREA
111 SF
DECK AREA
STAIR EXEMPT
RAISED PLANTER
RAISED PLANTERFLOOR AREA
1326 GSF
30 CSF
EGRESS WINDOW WELL
WALL AREA - 44 SF
EGRESS WINDOW WELL
WALL AREA - 44 SF
TOTAL WALL AREA: 194.25 SFTOTAL WALL AREA: 787.50 SF
TOTAL WALL AREA: 787.50 SF TOTAL WALL AREA: 194.25 SF1218 SF
NET LIVABLE AREA
909 SF
NET LIVABLE AREA GARAGE
EXEMPT
COVERED ENTRY PORCH696 SF
NET LIVABLE AREA
RAISED PLANTER
RAISED PLANTERDECK DECK
Consultants:
Issuances and Revisions:
COPYRIGHT 2020 ROWLAND + BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. NO
PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN.
ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN SHALL RETAIN ALL
COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT
THERETO.
SCALE:
SHEET TITLE:
PROJECT NO:File Path:Plot Date:FOR CITY OF ASPEN
rowland+broughton
architecture / urban design / interior design
500 w. main st.
aspen, co 81611
970.544.9006
1830 blake st.
denver, co 80202
303.308.1373
C:\Users\sharris\Documents\22014.00_MESA JARDIN_CENTRAL_steve.harris5Z5U7.rvt7/6/2020 2:21:14 PMAs indicated
LU0.6
22014.00
MESA LOT R
500 W MAIN STREET - LOT R
ASPEN, CO 81611
FLOOR AREA
CALCULATIONS
SCALE:
PLAN
NORTH
TRUE
NORTH
LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 LEVEL 1 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA
SCALE:
PLAN
NORTH
TRUE
NORTH
LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0"
3 LEVEL 2 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA
SCALE:
PLAN
NORTH
TRUE
NORTH
LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 BASEMENT LEVEL PROPOSED FLOOR AREA
SCALE:
PLAN
NORTH
TRUE
NORTH
LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0"
4 BASEMENT LEVEL - NET LIVABLE
SCALE:
PLAN
NORTH
TRUE
NORTH
LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0"
5 LEVEL 1 - NET LIVABLE
SCALE:
PLAN
NORTH
TRUE
NORTH
LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0"
6 LEVEL 2 - NET LIVABLE
05.07.2020 LAND USE APPLICATION
07.06.2020 LAND USE REVISION #1
138
T
DNUP
LU4.2
2
LU4.1
1
LU4.1
2
LU4.2
1
PROPERTY LINE
(E) FENCE
(E) TRANSFORMER
WILL REQUIRE
UTILITY EASEMENT
500 W MAIN STREET
SETBACK
5' - 0"
SETBACK
10' - 0"SETBACK5' - 0"SETBACK5' - 0"PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINECOVERED
PORCH
EGRESS WINDOW WELL EGRESS WINDOW WELL
2 CAR
GARAGE
16' - 0"81' - 8"
LINE OF DECK ABOVE
CONCRETE
WALK
(E) LILAC
WEST MAIN STN 4TH STREET 8' - 6"NEW LANDSCAPING
NEW LANDSCAPING
(E) TREE
(E) TREE(E) TREE(E) TREE
(E) TREE -ROOTS
TO BE PROTECTED
DURING
CONSTRUCTION (E) SIDEWALKROOF ABOVE
ALLEY
PARKING EASEMENT
FOR 500 W MAIN
STREET
18' - 0"
ACCESSIBLE
PARKING SPACE
ACCESSIBLE AISLE
3' - 0"RELOCATED TRASH AREA19' - 1 1/2"PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE11' - 1"52' - 9"17' - 11 1/4"19' - 7 1/2"RAISED PLANTER DECK RAISED PLANTER DECK 10" / 1'-0"STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFSOLAR PANEL QUANTITY AND
LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED
10" / 1'-0"Consultants:
Issuances and Revisions:
COPYRIGHT 2020 ROWLAND + BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. NO
PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN.
ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN SHALL RETAIN ALL
COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT
THERETO.
SCALE:
SHEET TITLE:
PROJECT NO:File Path:Plot Date:FOR CITY OF ASPEN
rowland+broughton
architecture / urban design / interior design
500 w. main st.
aspen, co 81611
970.544.9006
1830 blake st.
denver, co 80202
303.308.1373
C:\Users\sharris\Documents\22014.00_MESA JARDIN_CENTRAL_steve.harris5Z5U7.rvt7/6/2020 2:21:15 PM1/8" = 1'-0"
LU1.1
22014.00
MESA LOT R
500 W MAIN STREET - LOT R
ASPEN, CO 81611
SITE PLAN
SCALE:
PLAN
NORTH
TRUE
NORTH
LU1.1 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 SITE PLAN
05.07.2020 LAND USE APPLICATION
07.06.2020 LAND USE REVISION #1
SCALE:
PLAN
NORTH
TRUE
NORTH
LU1.1 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 ROOF PLAN
139
BASEMENT LEVEL
89' -6"
T.O. SLAB
LEVEL 1
100' -0"
T.O. PLY
LEVEL 2
110' -6"
T.O. PLY
RIDGE
128' -3 1/2"
T.O.
LEVEL 2 PLATE
119' -6 7/8"
T.O.
STEEL CHANNEL DECK
SUPPORT
METAL PANEL
WOOD SLIDING DOOR
METAL AND GLASS
WINDOW
9' - 0 7/8"8' - 0"8' - 8"8' - 8"7' - 2 11/16"0' - 10 5/8"10"
1'-0"
10"
1'-0"PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPOSED EXISTING STRUCTURE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY22' - 1
BUILDING HEIGHT
10/12 PITCH
EXISTING STRUCTURE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY 8' - 8 5/8"9' - 0 7/8"10' - 6"10' - 6"19' - 6 7/8"28' - 3 1/2"4' - 0"4' - 0"
WOOD SIDING
WOOD AND GLASS
ENTRY DOOR
STEEL COLUMN
METAL AND GLASS
WINDOW
SOLID PANEL
OUTLINE OF PROPOSED
BASEMENT
BASEMENT LEVEL
89' -6"
T.O. SLAB
LEVEL 1
100' -0"
T.O. PLY
LEVEL 2
110' -6"
T.O. PLY
RIDGE
128' -3 1/2"
T.O.
LEVEL 2 PLATE
119' -6 7/8"
T.O.
WOOD SIDING
STANDING SEAM METAL PANEL
5' - 0"2' - 6"2' - 6"10' - 0"
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
STEEL CHANNEL DECK SUPPORT
METAL AND GLASS WINDOW
2' - 6"5' - 0"PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPOSED CHANGES
OUTLINE OF PROPOSED
BASEMENT
OUTLINE OF WINDOW
WELL 10' - 6"10' - 6"9' - 0 7/8"8' - 8 5/8"19' - 6 7/8"28' - 3 1/2"WOOD TRIMWOOD TRIM
Consultants:
Issuances and Revisions:
COPYRIGHT 2020 ROWLAND + BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. NO
PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN.
ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN SHALL RETAIN ALL
COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT
THERETO.
SCALE:
SHEET TITLE:
PROJECT NO:File Path:Plot Date:FOR CITY OF ASPEN
rowland+broughton
architecture / urban design / interior design
500 w. main st.
aspen, co 81611
970.544.9006
1830 blake st.
denver, co 80202
303.308.1373
C:\Users\sharris\Documents\22014.00_MESA JARDIN_CENTRAL_steve.harris5Z5U7.rvt7/6/2020 2:21:19 PM1/4" = 1'-0"
LU4.1
22014.00
MESA LOT R
500 W MAIN STREET - LOT R
ASPEN, CO 81611
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
SCALE:LU4.1 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 SOUTH ELEVATION_LU
SCALE:LU4.1 1/4" = 1'-0"
2 WEST ELEVATION_LU
05.07.2020 LAND USE APPLICATION
07.06.2020 LAND USE REVISION #1
140
BASEMENT LEVEL
89' -6"
T.O. SLAB
LEVEL 1
100' -0"
T.O. PLY
LEVEL 2
110' -6"
T.O. PLY
RIDGE
128' -3 1/2"
T.O.
LEVEL 2 PLATE
119' -6 7/8"
T.O.
2' - 6"5' - 0"10' - 0"2' - 6"2' - 6"5' - 0"WOOD SIDING
METAL AND GLASS
WINDOW
STANDING SEAM METAL
PANEL
STANDING SEAM METAL
ROOF
STEEL CHANNEL DECK
SUPPORT PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEWOOD TRIM
10' - 6"8' - 8 5/8"9' - 0 7/8"10' - 6"19' - 6 7/8"28' - 3 1/2"WOOD TRIM
STEEL COLUMN
OUTLINE OF PROPOSED
BASEMENT
BASEMENT LEVEL
89' -6"
T.O. SLAB
LEVEL 1
100' -0"
T.O. PLY
LEVEL 2
110' -6"
T.O. PLY
RIDGE
128' -3 1/2"
T.O.
LEVEL 2 PLATE
119' -6 7/8"
T.O.PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEWOOD GARAGE DOOR
WOOD SIDING
WOOD TRIM
8' - 0"16' - 0"
METAL AND GLASS
WINDOW
METAL PANEL
OUTLINE OF PROPOSED
BASEMENT
10"
1'-0"
10"
1'-0"
PROPOSED7' - 2 11/16"0' - 10 5/8"8' - 0"8' - 8"8' - 8"
BUILDING HEIGHT
10/12 PITCH
22' - 1
EXISTING STRUCTURE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY EXISTING STRUCTURE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY 8' - 8 5/8"9' - 0 7/8"10' - 6"10' - 6"19' - 6 7/8"28' - 3 1/2"Consultants:
Issuances and Revisions:
COPYRIGHT 2020 ROWLAND + BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN
THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE
PROPERTY OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. NO
PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN.
ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN SHALL RETAIN ALL
COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT
THERETO.
SCALE:
SHEET TITLE:
PROJECT NO:File Path:Plot Date:FOR CITY OF ASPEN
rowland+broughton
architecture / urban design / interior design
500 w. main st.
aspen, co 81611
970.544.9006
1830 blake st.
denver, co 80202
303.308.1373
C:\Users\sharris\Documents\22014.00_MESA JARDIN_CENTRAL_steve.harris5Z5U7.rvt7/6/2020 2:21:20 PM1/4" = 1'-0"
LU4.2
22014.00
MESA LOT R
500 W MAIN STREET - LOT R
ASPEN, CO 81611
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
SCALE:LU4.2 1/4" = 1'-0"
2 EAST ELEVATION_LU
SCALE:LU4.2 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 NORTH ELEVATION_LU
05.07.2020 LAND USE APPLICATION
07.06.2020 LAND USE REVISION #1
141
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 2020
connecting element to the new addition which is next to the historic resource. Ms. Yoon stated
that staff had concerns with the relatability with mass and scale of the new addition as it related
to the historic lot. Ms. Yoon stated that the new iteration respects 11.3 in creating a scale and
proportion in relation to the historic resource. She said that the staff is in favor of the updated
plan. Ms. Yoon stated that other City departments have submitted comments and concerns to the
commission. Ms. Yoon reviewed the conditions for this project, that the applicant needs to work
with city staff and departments.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Ann Short neighbor of the project submitted a letter. Attached to the
minutes.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Ms. Greenwood stated that she like the redesign of the
massing and is in favor of moving this project forward.
Ms. Sanzone agreed with Ms. Greenwood's comments.
Mr. Halferty stated that he was not at the first meeting but supports this project moving forward.
Mr. Moyer asked about the covenants the neighbors agreed to.
Ms. Bryan stated that the city does not get involved in these kinds of issues.
Mr. Moyer stated that he agrees with everyone's comments and would like to see this move
forward.
Mr. Kendrick stated no comment.
Mr. Halferty moved to approve Resolution #15-2020. Ms. Sanzone seconded.
ROLL CALL: Mr. Halferty, Yes; Mr. Moyer, Yes; Mr. Kendrick Yes; Ms. Sanzone, Yes; Ms.
Greenwood, Yes. All in favor, Motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Halferty left the meeting
Ms. Thompson joined the meeting.
OLD BUSINESS: 500 W. Main Street – Conceptual Major Development and Residential
Design Standards Review. John Broughton of Rowland + Broughton representing the project.
Mr. Rowland stated that this property was a lot split on one half there sits the historic storefront
and the other is a garden where the new addition will be located. Mr. Rowland stated that their
mission was to build a cute single-family home on the adjacent lot. Mr. Rowland showed historic
photos and Sanborn maps of what the lot looked like and then he showed new renderings of the
proposed project. Mr. Broughton stated that the lot is thirty feet wide and one hundred thirty feet
deep, he added that there will be ten-foot setbacks on the front and back with five-foot setbacks
on the sides. Mr. Broughton stated that the structure will be twenty-five feet tall with a carved
out front entry with a gable form. He explained that the carved-out portion will be placed on the
back of the building. Mr. Broughton showed models to showcase the mass and scale of the
proposed project next to the historic resource.
Ms. Thompson asked if the applicant could discuss the porch and garage design.
Mr. Broughton stated that the porch has a significant amount of planter boxes built-in and said
by code they will need to extend it by one foot. He said the garage door will be designed to
reflect a more historic feel. Mr. Broughton said that the garage door will be a signal panel.
Ms. Greenwood asked about the residential design and standards and if there was another
vernation being asked for.
142
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 2020
Mr. Broughton stated that the sidewall length on the second floor is fifty feet and the ground
level is less than that.
STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon stated that the applicant requested transferable development
rights in the past during the lot split and now they have chosen to build a house on the garden lot.
Ms. Simon said that in this zone district there is an automatic twenty-five percent reduction in
floor area for homes rather than a commercial space. Ms. Simon stated that the applicant does
not need any setback variations or any other variations besides the residential design standards.
Ms. Simon stated that staff finds that they meet all the HPC guidelines for new construction on a
historic lot. Ms. Simon said that the mass of this project is well suited for the area and lot. Ms.
Simon stated that in the resolution there is a need for restudy on two issues. Ms. Simon said that
staff supports project and recommends approval with conditions. She said that there were three
letters of community input submitted with the packet and two others emailed.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Mr. Kendrick stated that this project looks very nice
however the mass seems a little too big. He said he is ok with approval.
Ms. Greenwood stated that the massing looks different from the model vs the rendering.
Ms. Thompson stated her disappointment that the historic cabin to the left of the property was
not shown with the model. She agrees with Mr. Kendrick that the mass is too big.
Mr. Moyer stated that the mass is way too large and the front entry is unfriendly. Mr. Moyer
explained that the model is a better visual than the rendering.
Ms. Greenwood stated that she agrees with the viewpoint that the massing of the front entry is
too big.
Ms. Thompson stated that she could be more supportive if the front façade had a restudy
referencing guideline 11.4 regarding the front elevation and front porch.
Mr. Moyer stated if you look at the project, the sidewall is very tall compared to the Victorian
next door. He further explained that the roof meets the wall with no overhang giving it an
industrial feel and look. Mr. Moyer followed up by stating he is not ready for this to move
forward and that this project needs to be reworked.
Ms. Sanzone stated that she would be in support of this project moving forward and letting the
applicant rework the mass facade.
Mr. Kendrick stated that he is in support of the variation. He said that he feels it is the planters
that make the porch feel so heavy.
Ms. Greenwood stated that she is in favor of moving the project forward with a restudy.
Mr. Moyer stated that the applicant could do so much more, and not in favor of it going forward.
Ms. Thompson stated she would like to see the applicant again before the final review.
Ms. Greenwood stated that this will be a staff and monitor situation.
Rachel Broughton with Rowland + Broughton stated that her team feels the project fits in with
the historic storefront that sits next door. Ms. Broughton explained if you striped the front façade
of the storefront you would be left with a two-story gable structure. Ms. Broughton said that she
has already started a redesign on the planters on the porch and how to lower the guardrail while
staying in the code.
Ms. Greenwood stated that when designing porches on main street one must be delicate in
design. Ms. Greenwood reiterated that she is still in favor of moving this forward with staff and
monitoring.
143
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 22, 2020
Ms. Thompson stated that she believes the applicant could come up with a thoughtful redesign
and would now support it to moving forward.
Mr. Kendrick stated that he feels that the overhang gives the mass a hollow feeling and
suggested the second floor sift back to create more room.
Mr. Moyer reiterated his stance on the unfriendly porch.
Mr. Rowland stated that he is taking the commissions comments very seriously and that the next
time they present to the commission HPC will be very pleased.
Ms. Sanzone motioned to approve Resolution #016-2020. Mr. Kendrick seconded.
ROLL CALL: Mr. Moyer, Yes; Mr. Kendrick Yes; Ms. Sanzone; Yes, Ms. Sanzone, Yes; Ms.
Greenwood, Yes. All in favor, Motion carried 5-0.
Adjourn: Mr. Moyer moved to adjourn. Ms. Thompson seconded. All in favor, Motion carried
5-0.
___________________________
Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk
144
HPC Resolution #16, Series of 2020
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION #16, SERIES OF 2020
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN
STANDARDS APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 500 WEST MAIN
STREET, LOT R, MESA SUBDIVISION, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,
COLORADO
PARCEL ID: 2735-124-43-008
WHEREAS, the applicant, 500 West Main Street, LLC, represented by Rowland+Broughton,
has requested HPC approval for Conceptual Major Development and Residential Design
Standards review for the property located at 500 West Main Street, Lot R, Mesa Subdivision, City
and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure
shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a
designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted
to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures
established for their review;” and
WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application,
a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s
conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section
26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC
may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain
additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and
WHEREAS, Residential Design Standards review is administrative, except for any Variations.
Variations are reviewed by a board, in this case HPC, and must be found to be in conformance
with Section 26.410.020.D of the Municipal Code, Variation Review Standards. The HPC may
approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional
information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and
WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for
compliance with applicable review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and
WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on July 22nd, 2020. HPC considered the application,
the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review
standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 5 to 0.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development and Residential Design Standards
review for the property located at 500 West Main Street, Lot R, Mesa Subdivision, City and Townsite
of Aspen, Colorado as follows.
145
HPC Resolution #16, Series of 2020
Page 2 of 3
Section 1:
The approval is subject to these conditions:
1. A variation from the Building Articulation requirement of the Residential Design
Standards is granted.
2. The project must be adjusted to comply with the One-story Element and Garage Door
Design requirements of the Residential Design Standards. For Final review, the applicant
is to further study the front porch on the ground and upper floors, and consider adjusting
the upper floor roof overhang.
3. Coordination with the Engineering Department is needed on the following topics:
• If the sidewalk curb in gutter in front of the site are not new, the property will be
required to replace them per City of Aspen standards.
• In order for the drywell on Lot S to be used to treat stormwater from Lot R, drainage
easements, maintenance agreements and access to the infrastructure will need to be
addressed.
4. Coordination with the Building Department is needed on the following topics:
• Due to the proximity of the house to the egress stair on the west side of the office
structure, the east wall of the new house must have a 1 hour fire rating on both sides
of the wall.
• Windows on this wall may need to be fire-rated, or a sprinkler system installed.
• Additional fire-proof construction may be needed adjacent to the transformer in the
northwest corner of the site.
5. Coordination with the Parks Department is needed on the following topics:
• During construction, to protect the cottonwood street trees, the front yard, up to the
10’ setback, must be barricaded with a 6’ fence with an attached fabric liner. A
mulch bedding may be required.
• The water line will need to be located as far east as possible to protect the street trees.
• Parks will need to consult on sidewalk, curb and gutter replacement, if they are to
occur.
6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one
(1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an
application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the
Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole
discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for
a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written
request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date.
Section 2: Material Representations
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation
Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development
approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by
other specific conditions or an authorized authority.
146
HPC Resolution #16, Series of 2020
Page 3 of 3
Section 3: Existing Litigation
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 4: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at a special meeting on the 10th day of June 2020.
Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content:
_______________________________ _______________________________
Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Gretchen Greenwood, Chair
ATTEST:
__________________________
Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk
147
ORDINANCE NO. 10
Series of 2020
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, TO
AMENDCHAPTERS 25.20.020,WASTINGOF WATER, AND 25.28,WATERSHORTAGES,
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS,theCityCouncilhasa currently adoptedwater shortage policytoaddressashortage
initssupplyofwater that this ordinance further refines and additionally provides a framework for
sustainable water use during drought conditions; and
WHEREAS, this policy maintains essential public services to preserve public health and
safety, environmental resources, and economic activity during all drought stages; and
WHEREAS, Aspen’s water supply is highly dependent upon snowpack and snowmelt
runoff with no current storage and a large dependence on streamflow availability at its river
diversion points; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance provides guidance to prepare for, and respond to, drought
conditions with transitions and action steps within the varying drought stages.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance furthers, and is necessary for, the
promotion of the public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE ITORDAINED BY THE COUNCILOFTHECITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO:
Section 1.
ThatSection25.20.020oftheMunicipalCodeoftheCityofAspen,Coloradowhichsets
forth wasting of water prohibited, is herebydeleted in its entirety.
148
Section 2.
That Section 25.28 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Colorado which sets
forth water shortages applicability, is hereby repealed and replaced as follows:
Chapter 25.28. - WATER MANAGEMENT
Sec 25.28.010. – Purpose.
The City is committed to sustainability and providing a quality potable water supply to the
community. The efficient use of the City’s water resources as identified in the City's municipal
water efficiency plan assures an adequate water supply for municipal water customers for all
municipal purposes. The City supports and promotes the wise use of water under all conditions
to help preserve essential public services and minimize the adverse effects of a water supply
emergency on public health and safety, economic activity, environmental resources, economic
activity, and individual lifestyles. When water shortages occur, restrictions on the use of water
are imposed in order to protect the health and safety of citizens and property owners.
Sec. 25.28.020. - Wasting of water prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person using water from the City water system or any system
connected thereto, to waste water. For purposes of this Section, to waste water shall mean any of
the following:
(a) The unnecessary running of water, which is not applied to any beneficial use, through
or out of any water closet, lavatory, urinal, bathtub, hose, hydrant, faucet or other fixture,
appliance or apparatus whatsoever, through the neglect or by reason of faulty or imperfect
plumbing or fixture; or
(b) Applying more water than is reasonably necessary to establish and maintain a healthy
landscape, including but not limited to, the continuous application of water to lawns, sod,
landscaping, or amenity resulting in oversaturation, ponding, pooling, or the flowing of
water into drainage or storm drainage facilities; or
(c) Watering with spray irrigation between the hours of 8.00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m. during the
period from May 1 to October 1, except for the following uses:
(1) Watering for up to twenty-one (21) consecutive days to establish irrigated turf from
seed or sod;
(2) Watering new plant material on the day of planting (e.g., flowers, trees, and shrubs);
(3) Watering that is essential to preserve irrigated or artificial turf subject to heavy
public use;
149
(4) Operating an irrigation system for installation, repair, audit, or reasonable
maintenance, if the system is attended throughout the period of operation;
(5) Watering where tree preservation is required under the local tree ordinance.
(d) Watering landscaped areas during precipitation or high wind; or
(e) Applying water intended for irrigation to an impervious surface, (e.g., a street, parking
lot, alley, sidewalk or driveway); or
(f) Failure to repair an irrigation system unit which is known to be leaking; or
(g) Failure to use covers for outdoor pools or hot tubs; or
(h) Using water instead of a broom or mop to clean outdoor impervious surfaces (e.g.,
sidewalks, driveways, and patios), except when cleaning with water is necessary for
public health or safety reasons or when other cleaning methods are impractical and in
which case the hose must be equipped with an automatic shut-off nozzle; or
(i) Washing vehicles with a hose that lacks an automatic shut-off nozzle; or
(j) Violation of restrictions imposed in connection with a declared water shortage per
Chapter 25.28.030.
The prohibitions against wasting water are applicable regardless of whether a water shortage
has been declared or a system emergency exits. Additional restrictions during times of a declared
water shortage may apply pursuant to Chapter 25.28.030.
(Code 1971, § 23-151; Ord. No. 27-1985 , § 1; Ord. No. 37-1991 , § 5; Ord. No. 24-2019 , § 1,
11-26-2019)
Sec. 25.28.022. - Exceptions.
The following activities do not constitute the wasting of water for purposes of Section
25.20.020:
(a) Flow resulting from firefighting or routine inspection of fire hydrants or from fire
training activities; or
(b) Flow resulting from routine inspection, operation, or maintenance of a utility water
system; or
(c) Water applied as a dust control measure; or
(d) Water used for construction or maintenance activities where the application of water is
the appropriate methodology and where no other practical alternative exists; or
(e) Street sweeping; or
(f) Other watering activities reasonably necessary to protect public health or safety.
(Ord. No. 24-2019 , § 1, 11-26-2019)
25.28.030. - Water shortage declaration.
150
(a) A water shortage shall be declared upon a finding by the City Council that the City is facing
a shortage in its supply of water due to drought, system capacity, or any other cause. Such a
finding shall be made by resolution.
(b) The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the use of the treated water supply, pressurized
and non-pressurized raw water, and reuse water of the City to the extent any City-customer
agreements provide for curtailment of water use or suspension of water delivery during water
shortages or emergencies.
(c) The City Council shall regulate the water service usage in accordance with subsection (a) of
this section through adoption by resolution of a “drought mitigation and response plan”, which
shall be prepared and maintained by the Aspen Utilities Department.
(d) The City Manager shall promulgate rules and regulations to implement the response plan as
appropriate to address the water shortage declared by City Council. Such rules and regulations
may include exemptions, as deemed appropriate by the City Manager.
(e) When the resolution finding a water shortage is approved, the plan set forth in the rules and
regulations shall be implemented. Such rules and regulations shall have full force and effect
and shall be enforceable until such a time as the water shortage is found by City Council to
have ended. It shall be an additional responsibility of the Utilities Director, under direction of
the City Manager, to ensure that the measures described in the rules and regulations are carried
out and to provide sufficient coordination between City departments.
(f) In the event of an emergency, the City Manager shall have the authority to institute rules and
regulations affecting the uses of all water served by the water delivery system until such a
time that a water shortage declaration can be made by the City Council but no longer than 21
consecutive days.
(Code 1971, § 23-200; Ord. No. 27-1985, § 1 ; Ord. No. 18-2002 § 1 [part]
Sec. 25.28.040. - Enforcement and Appeal Process.
The owner or occupant of the licensed premises shall be responsible for compliance with
this Chapter and those who violate these regulations or restrictions shall be subject to the
following actions and penalties.
(a) Upon first violation, the owner or occupant will be issued a written warning.
(b) Upon further violations within a 12-month period from the date of the warning notice
at the same premises, the owner or occupant will be advised in writing and the following
penalty charges will be added to the water bill for the property.
(1) The following penalties shall be due, payable and collectible from any person,
customer, or owner of the residential property pursuant to the provisions of this chapter
by the due date of the water bill. Unless a water shortage declaration is in place, the
charges are based on the “Normal Conditions” column and reflect violations to Section
25.28.020. During a water shortage declaration, the charges are based upon the stage, as
appropriate:
151
Violation Normal
Conditions
Water Shortage Declaration
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Emergency
Response
2nd
Violation $125.00 $175.00 $200.00 $300.00 $400.00
3rd Violation $250.00 $300.00 $325.00 $400.00 $500.00
All
Additional
Violations
$500.00 $525.00 $550.00 $650.00 $750.00
(2) The following penalties shall be due, payable and collectible from any nonresidential
customer pursuant to the provisions of this chapter by the due date of the water bill.
Unless a water shortage declaration is in place, the charges are based on the “Normal
Conditions” column. During a water shortage declaration, the charges are based upon the
declared drought stage, as appropriate:
Violation Normal
Conditions
Water Shortage Declaration
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Emergency
Response
2nd Violation $250.00 $300.00 $500.00 $750.00 $1,000.00
3rd Violation $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $1,500.00 $1,750.00 $2,000.00
All
Additional
Violations
$2,000.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00
(c) After the fourth violation within a 12-month period from the date of the warning notice
at the same premises, if continued waste of water or willful violation of these regulations
or restrictions occurs, the Water Department may disconnect the service where the
violation has occurred.
(d) Appeal Process. Any person subject to a charge for violation of a provision of this
Chapter may appeal the charge by contacting the Aspen Water Department in writing
within twenty (20) days of receipt of monthly utility bill containing the violation charge.
Unless the customer's appeal is approved prior to the water bill due date, the customer
shall pay any charges that appear on the water bill by the due date of the water bill. If the
customer's appeal is approved after payment has been made, the disputed charge will be
credited on the next water bill.
(Ord. No. 24-2019 , § 1, 11-26-2019)
152
Sec. 25.28.050. - Monthly rates for water shortages.
Unless an alternative system of charges is adopted by City Council, temporary rates will be in
effect during the time that the City Council declares a water shortage. Factors from the tables
below will be specified in the rules and regulations for the water shortage declared by City
Council and will be applied to monthly variable charges identified in Section 25.16.010 to develop
temporary rate increases. Temporary rate increases shall go into effect after a minimum of a 48-
hour notification of this rate change by the City of Aspen City Manager and as set forth in the
rules and regulations provided via Public Notice.
(a) Four-Tier Rate Structure:
Billing Tier
Usage in
Gallons Per
ECU
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Emergency
Response
I 0 to 4,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
II 4,001 to 12,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
III 12,001 to 16,000 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75
IV Over 16,000 1.0 to 2.0 1.0 to 2.0 1.0 to 2.0 1.0 to 2.0
(b) Two-Tier Rate Structure (Bulk Water Customers):
Billing Tier
Usage in
Gallons Per
ECU
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Emergency
Response
I 0 to 2,940 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
II Over 2,940 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75
(c) Raw Water Rate Structure, Pressurized and Non-Pressurized:
Non-
Pressurized
Raw Water
Pressurized
Raw Water Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Emergenc
y
Response
Per 1,000 Sq. Ft Per 1,000
Gallons 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to
1.75
1.0 to
1.75 1.0 to 1.75
Section 3.
Any and all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the City of Aspen covering the same
matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances
inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed; provided, however, that such
repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or punishment of any person for any act done or
committed in violation of any ordinance hereby repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance.153
Section 4.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to
be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City of Aspen hereby declares that it would have adopted
this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases thereof be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section 5.
This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage, adoption and publication thereof as
provided by law.
Section 6.
This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinance repealed or amended as herein
provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE WAS INTRODUCED, READ, ORDERED AND
PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the _____ day of
____________ 2020.
Attest:
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
FINALLY, adopted, passed, and approved this ______ day of ________ 2020.
Attest:
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
Approved as to form:
James R. True, City Attorney
154
ORDINANCE NO. 10
Series of 2020
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, TO
AMENDCHAPTERS 25.20.020,WASTINGOF WATER, AND 25.28,WATERSHORTAGES,
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
WHEREAS,theCityCouncilhasa currently adoptedwater shortage policytoaddressashortage
initssupplyofwater that this ordinance further refines and additionally provides a framework for
sustainable water use during drought conditions; and
WHEREAS, this policy maintains essential public services to preserve public health and
safety, environmental resources, and economic activity during all drought stages; and
WHEREAS, Aspen’s water supply is highly dependent upon snowpack and snowmelt
runoff with no current storage and a large dependence on streamflow availability at its river
diversion points; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance provides guidance to prepare for, and respond to, drought
conditions with transitions and action steps within the varying drought stages.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance furthers, and is necessary for, the
promotion of the public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE ITORDAINED BY THE COUNCILOFTHECITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO:
Section 1.
ThatSection25.20.020oftheMunicipalCodeoftheCityofAspen,Coloradowhichsets
forth wasting of water prohibited, is herebydeleted in its entirety.
155
Section 2.
That Section 25.28 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Colorado which sets
forth water shortages applicability, is hereby repealed and replaced as follows:
Chapter 25.28. - WATER MANAGEMENT
Sec 25.28.010. – Purpose.
The City is committed to sustainability and providing a quality potable water supply to the
community. The efficient use of the City’s water resources as identified in the City's municipal
water efficiency plan assures an adequate water supply for municipal water customers for all
municipal purposes. The City supports and promotes the wise use of water under all conditions
to help preserve essential public services and minimize the adverse effects of a water supply
emergency on public health and safety, economic activity, environmental resources, economic
activity, and individual lifestyles. When water shortages occur, restrictions on the use of water
are imposed in order to protect the health and safety of citizens and property owners.
Sec. 25.28.020. - Wasting of water prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person using water from the City water system or any system
connected thereto, to waste water. For purposes of this Section, to waste water shall mean any of
the following:
(a) The unnecessary running of water, which is not applied to any beneficial use, through
or out of any water closet, lavatory, urinal, bathtub, hose, hydrant, faucet or other fixture,
appliance or apparatus whatsoever, through the neglect or by reason of faulty or imperfect
plumbing or fixture; or
(b) Applying more water than is reasonably necessary to establish and maintain a healthy
landscape, including but not limited to, the continuous application of water to lawns, sod,
landscaping, or amenity resulting in oversaturation, ponding, pooling, or the flowing of
water into drainage or storm drainage facilities; or
(c) Watering with spray irrigation between the hours of 8.00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m. during the
period from May 1 to October 1, except for the following uses:
(1) Watering for up to twenty-one (21) consecutive days to establish irrigated turf from
seed or sod;
(2) Watering new plant material on the day of planting (e.g., flowers, trees, and shrubs);
(3) Watering that is essential to preserve irrigated or artificial turf subject to heavy
public use;
156
(4) Operating an irrigation system for installation, repair, audit, or reasonable
maintenance, if the system is attended throughout the period of operation;
(5) Watering where tree preservation is required under the local tree ordinance; or
(d) Watering landscaped areas during precipitation or high wind; or
(e) Applying water intended for irrigation to an impervious surface, (e.g., a street, parking
lot, alley, sidewalk or driveway); or
(f) Failure to repair an irrigation system unit which is known to be leaking; or
(g) Failure to use covers for outdoor pools or hot tubs; or
(h) Using water instead of a broom or mop to clean outdoor impervious surfaces (e.g.,
sidewalks, driveways, and patios), except when cleaning with water is necessary for
public health or safety reasons or when other cleaning methods are impractical and in
which case the hose must be equipped with an automatic shut-off nozzle; or
(i) Washing vehicles with a hose that lacks an automatic shut-off nozzle; or
(j) Violation of restrictions imposed in connection with a declared water shortage per
Chapter 25.28.030.
The prohibitions against wasting water are applicable regardless of whether a water shortage
has been declared or a system emergency exits. Additional restrictions during times of a declared
water shortage may apply pursuant to Chapter 25.28.030.
(Code 1971, § 23-151; Ord. No. 27-1985 , § 1; Ord. No. 37-1991 , § 5; Ord. No. 24-2019 , § 1,
11-26-2019)
Sec. 25.28.022. - Exceptions.
The following activities do not constitute the wasting of water for purposes of Section
25.20.020:
(a) Flow resulting from firefighting or routine inspection of fire hydrants or from fire
training activities; or
(b) Flow resulting from routine inspection, operation, or maintenance of a utility water
system; or
(c) Water applied as a dust control measure; or
(d) Water used for construction or maintenance activities where the application of water is
the appropriate methodology and where no other practical alternative exists; or
(e) Street sweeping; or
(f) Other watering activities reasonably necessary to protect public health or safety.
(Ord. No. 24-2019 , § 1, 11-26-2019)
25.28.030. - Water shortage declaration.
157
(a) A water shortage shall be declared upon a finding by the City Council that the City is facing
a shortage in its supply of water due to drought, system capacity, or any other cause. Such a
finding shall be made by resolution.
(b) The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the use of the treated water supply, pressurized
and non-pressurized raw water, and reuse water of the City to the extent any City-customer
agreements provide for curtailment of water use or suspension of water delivery during water
shortages or emergencies.
(c) The City Council shall regulate the water service usage in accordance with subsection (a) of
this section through adoption by resolution of a “drought mitigation and response plan”, which
shall be prepared and maintained by the Aspen Utilities Department.
(d) The City Manager shall promulgate rules and regulations to implement the response plan as
appropriate to address the water shortage declared by City Council. Such rules and regulations
may include exemptions, as deemed appropriate by the City Manager.
(e) When the resolution finding a water shortage is approved, the plan set forth in the rules and
regulations shall be implemented. Such rules and regulations shall have full force and effect
and shall be enforceable until such a time as the water shortage is found by City Council to
have ended. It shall be an additional responsibility of the Utilities Director, under direction of
the City Manager, to ensure that the measures described in the rules and regulations are carried
out and to provide sufficient coordination between City departments.
(f) In the event of an emergency, the City Manager shall have the authority to institute rules and
regulations affecting the uses of all water served by the water delivery system until such a
time that a water shortage declaration can be made by the City Council but no longer than 21
consecutive days.
(Code 1971, § 23-200; Ord. No. 27-1985, § 1 ; Ord. No. 18-2002 § 1 [part]
Sec. 25.28.040. - Enforcement and Appeal Process.
The owner or occupant of the licensed premises shall be responsible for compliance with
this Chapter and those who violate these regulations or restrictions shall be subject to the
following actions and penalties.
(a) Upon first violation, the owner or occupant will be issued a written warning.
(b) Upon further violations within a 12-month period from the date of the warning notice
at the same premises, the owner or occupant will be advised in writing and the following
penalty charges will be added to the water bill for the property.
(1) The following penalties shall be due, payable and collectible from any person,
customer, or owner of the residential property pursuant to the provisions of this chapter
by the due date of the water bill. Unless a water shortage declaration is in place, the
charges are based on the “Normal Conditions” column and reflect violations to Section
25.28.020. During a water shortage declaration, the charges are based upon the stage, as
appropriate:
158
Violation Normal
Conditions
Water Shortage Declaration
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Emergency
Response
2nd
Violation $125.00 $175.00 $200.00 $300.00 $400.00
3rd Violation $250.00 $300.00 $325.00 $400.00 $500.00
All
Additional
Violations
$500.00 $525.00 $550.00 $650.00 $750.00
(2) The following penalties shall be due, payable and collectible from any nonresidential
customer pursuant to the provisions of this chapter by the due date of the water bill.
Unless a water shortage declaration is in place, the charges are based on the “Normal
Conditions” column. During a water shortage declaration, the charges are based upon the
declared drought stage, as appropriate:
Violation Normal
Conditions
Water Shortage Declaration
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Emergency
Response
2nd Violation $250.00 $300.00 $500.00 $750.00 $1,000.00
3rd Violation $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $1,500.00 $1,750.00 $2,000.00
All
Additional
Violations
$2,000.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,500.00 $4,000.00
(c) After the fourth violation within a 12-month period from the date of the warning notice
at the same premises, if continued waste of water or willful violation of these regulations
or restrictions occurs, the Water Department may disconnect the service where the
violation has occurred.
(d) Appeal Process. Any person subject to a charge for violation of a provision of this
Chapter may appeal the charge by contacting the Aspen Water Department in writing
within twenty (20) days of receipt of monthly utility bill containing the violation charge.
Unless the customer's appeal is approved prior to the water bill due date, the customer
shall pay any charges that appear on the water bill by the due date of the water bill. If the
customer's appeal is approved after payment has been made, the disputed charge will be
credited on the next water bill.
(Ord. No. 24-2019 , § 1, 11-26-2019)
159
Sec. 25.28.050. - Monthly rates for water shortages.
Unless an alternative system of charges is adopted by City Council, temporary rates will be in
effect during the time that the City Council declares a water shortage. Factors from the tables
below will be specified in the rules and regulations for the water shortage declared by City
Council and will be applied to monthly variable charges identified in Section 25.16.010 to develop
temporary rate increases. Temporary rate increases shall go into effect after a minimum of a 48-
hour notification of this rate change by the City of Aspen City Manager and as set forth in the
rules and regulations provided via Public Notice.
(a) Four-Tier Rate Structure:
Billing Tier
Usage in
Gallons Per
ECU
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Emergency
Response
I 0 to 4,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
II 4,001 to 12,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
III 12,001 to 16,000 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75
IV Over 16,000 1.0 to 2.0 1.0 to 2.0 1.0 to 2.0 1.0 to 2.0
(b) Two-Tier Rate Structure (Bulk Water Customers):
Billing Tier
Usage in
Gallons Per
ECU
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Emergency
Response
I 0 to 2,940 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
II Over 2,940 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to 1.75
(c) Raw Water Rate Structure, Pressurized and Non-Pressurized:
Non-
Pressurized
Raw Water
Pressurized
Raw Water Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Emergenc
y
Response
Per 1,000 Sq. Ft Per 1,000
Gallons 1.0 to 1.75 1.0 to
1.75
1.0 to
1.75 1.0 to 1.75
Section 3.
Any and all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the City of Aspen covering the same
matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances
inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed; provided, however, that such
repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or punishment of any person for any act done or
committed in violation of any ordinance hereby repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance.160
Section 4.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to
be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City of Aspen hereby declares that it would have adopted
this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases thereof be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section 5.
This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage, adoption and publication thereof as
provided by law.
Section 6.
This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinance repealed or amended as herein
provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE WAS INTRODUCED, READ, ORDERED AND
PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the _____ day of
____________ 2020.
Attest:
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
FINALLY, adopted, passed, and approved this ______ day of ________ 2020.
Attest:
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
Approved as to form:
James R. True, City Attorney
161
1
443 E. Durant Ave. / Extension of Temporary Use
City Council Hearing – August 25, 2020
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council
FROM:Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer
MEMO DATE:August 17, 2020
MEETING DATE:August 25, 2020
RE:Extension of Temporary Use –Silver Circle Ice Rink, 433 E. Durant
Avenue, Resolution #067, Series of 2020, Public Hearing continued from
August 11, 2020
_____
Applicant:G.A. Resort Condo
Association, Inc., c/o Hyatt Residence
Club, Bob Weisman, President, 415 E.
Dean St., Aspen, CO 81611
Representative:Chris Bendon,
BendonAdams, 300 S. Spring St. #202,
Aspen, CO 81611
Location:433 E. Durant Avenue
Current Zoning & Use:P - Park
Summary:In September 2019, the
applicant received Temporary Use
approval to install a large chiller by the
Silver Circle ice rink for the 2019/2020
winter season. The chiller was a short-
term solution to manufacture ice after the
original refrigeration system, and a
subsequent synthetic ice surface, proved
to be problematic. The chiller was
permitted to remain in place until March
31, 2020, but could not be removed at that
time due to COVID-19. The applicant
would like to retain the equipment through
next winter, while researching a
permanent solution to maintain the ice rink
or propose an alternative use.
Staff Recommendation:In June 2020, City
Council granted a Temporary Use approval to allow
the chiller to remain in place into September.
TemporaryUses can only be granted for six months
at a time. The applicant is requesting another
extension while they prepare an application for a
Planned Development amendment which may
involve permanent installation of the chiller, or
another solution.
The maximum Temporary Use extension in one
action is 180 days, however staff recommends that
the “clock” start on October 12, 2020, at the
expiration of Council Resolution #052, Series of
2020, which allows for flexibility in the granting of
Temporary Uses during the public health crisis.
This approval will allow the chiller to function for the
full 2020/2021 ski season, until April 10, 2021. The
chiller shall be unused except during the dates
when the rink is in operation. It has not proven to
be a nuisance and Council has indicated a desire
to keep the ice facility viable.
Silver Circle Ice Rink (Photo Courtesy of
www.uncovercolorado.com)
162
2
443 E. Durant Ave. / Extension of Temporary Use
City Council Hearing – August 25, 2020
REQUEST OF COUNCIL: The applicant requests an Extension of Temporary Use
approval, which Council may grant for a period of up to 180 days. Temporary uses are
those uses or structures that may or may not be permitted in a given zone district, but
which may be allowed on a nonpermanent and temporary basis upon individual review of
their proposed nature, location, duration, impact and compatibility with surrounding
permitted uses and structures,
City Council is the final review authority on this matter.
LOCATION AND BACKGROUND: The existing ice rink and associated landscaped area
are in the Park (P) zone district. The facility was approved in 1992 as part of the Hyatt
Grand Aspen development, the timeshare lodge located to the south, at 415 E. Dean St.
Figure 1: Area Map
Ordinance #12, Series 1992 granted approval for the development of the “Aspen Winter
Garden”, which was provided by the developers of the Grand Hyatt Aspen as a public
park amenity. As part of Planned Unit Development, the dedication from the developers
was provided in lieu of requirements for Subdivision, park and water tap fees. The park
area also fulfills the development’s open space requirements.
The Grand Hyatt Aspen retains ownership over the property and is responsible for the
park, including the upkeep of the ice refrigeration system which maintains the skating
surface throughout the winter season. Management of the rink and associated services
is contracted with the owners of CP Burger, the restaurant located on site.
The 1992 approval stipulates several features and activities which must be present on
the site to ensure it provides a public park amenity as originally approved by Council. The
approval includes specific language about the type of refrigeration system provided and
163
3
443 E. Durant Ave. / Extension of Temporary Use
City Council Hearing – August 25, 2020
its maintenance. The approval requires that an ice-skating rink be provided in perpetuity
until such time as the approval is amended or the property redeveloped.
In 2018, the applicant approached the City with a proposal to replace the refrigerated
natural ice surface with “synthetic ice”. The original refrigeration system required
increasing maintenance to function properly, and the coolant used in the system (CFC-
22) is to be phased-out of use in 2020 according to the EPA. Without CFC-22,
modifications and additional maintenance of the system would be required to continue to
provide an ice-skating surface. Citing maintenance challenges and associated costs, as
well as a desire to reprogram the site in the future, the applicant requested an
Insubstantial Planned Development Amendment from the Community Development
Department to replace the ice with a “synthetic ice” surface which did not require
refrigeration.
That administrative amendment was granted November 19, 2018 based on
representations made by the applicant appearing to meet the criteria for such an
amendment. During the first few months of the 2019-2020 winter season, the Community
Development Department received complaints from customers, members of the public,
and City Council members about the suitability of the synthetic skating surface and the
unsatisfactory user experience. On April 2, 2019, the Community Development Director
revoked the approval via letter (attached as Exhibit B). The consequence of the
revocation was the requirement that the applicant reinstate the ice-skating amenity as
described in the 1992 approval.
Subsequently, the applicant appealed the Director’s action, but has stayed their pursuit
of the appeal for the time being, in recognition that Council’s Temporary Use approval
provided an interim solution.
Council has indicated that the commitments made to provide a public amenity on this site
are a high priority. Both the applicant and the community benefit from the previous
agreements. During the previous Temporary Use reviews, Council unanimously favored
the continued use of a refrigerated ice surface as required in the original approval and
encouraged at least the short-term use of a modern above grade chiller unit. A below
grade location may or may not be achievable as it would potentially require significant
modifications to the site and may raise new waterproofing issues.
The visual and noise impacts of the chiller unit were evaluated in depth before the first
Temporary Use approval was granted. The unit is very large but is located in what has
always been a utilitarian corner of the site. A screen wall was required but restricted to
the standard fence height limit of 6,’ which doesn’t fully cover the equipment. This could
164
4
443 E. Durant Ave. / Extension of Temporary Use
City Council Hearing – August 25, 2020
potentially be adjusted through a Planned Development review for a permanent
installation.
Figure 2: View of the site before and after the chiller installation.
The maximum permitted noise level in commercial zone districts between 7:00 a.m. and
9:00 p.m. is 65 dBa.
Community Development received no complaints from the public regarding noise, the
quality of the skating experience or the presence of the equipment last season. The
owners of CP Burger, the business to the east of the rink and the operators of the rink in
winter, have stated their desire to continue to have a functioning rink for the 2020-2021
winter season. Further, they did not object to the noise level of the unit in operation during
the previous winter season. Staff believes it is important that this site continue to provide
an engaging and pleasant amenity to the public as envisioned in the 1992 approval. As
such, staff supports an Extension of the Temporary Use, which meets the intent of the
existing land use approvals.
The Extension of Temporary Use approval is limited to 180 days, which, calculated from
the expiration of Council’s Resolution #052, Series of 2020, providing relaxed
enforcement on land use regulations during Covid-19, will be April 10
th, 2021. Staff
recommends a March 1, 2021 deadline be established for the applicant to propose a long-
term plan for the ice surface.
STAFF FINDINGS: Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request against the relevant review
criteria and finds the following:
The proposed Extension of Temporary Use is consistent with the existing approval for the
use of the park site, insofar as it provides a refrigerated ice-skating surface. The proposed
uses would allow the applicant to continue to provide the public amenity required in the
1992 approval while the applicant, Council, and the community discuss long-term
solutions for the use of the site.
165
5
443 E. Durant Ave. / Extension of Temporary Use
City Council Hearing – August 25, 2020
FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: N/A.
ALTERNATIVES: Council may choose to deny the extension, which would require the
applicant to remove the chiller. Council may choose to condition the temporary use
extension upon the applicant’s submission of a long-term solution for the site, or other
requirements at Council’s discretion.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends approval of Resolution #067, Series of
2020, granting a 180-day Extension of the Temporary Use approval for the portable
refrigeration unit, with the extension “clock” beginning on October 12, 2020 and a deadline
to submit an application for a PD amendment by March 1, 2021.
PROPOSED MOTION (WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE):
“I move to approve Resolution #067, Series of 2020.”
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution #067, Series of 2020
Exhibit A- Staff Findings, Temporary Use
Exhibit B- Voided Approval for Synthetic Ice, 2019
Exhibit C- Council minutes of June 9, 2020, Granting Temporary Use Approval
Exhibit D- Council Resolution #045, Series of 2020, Granting Temporary Use Approval
Exhibit E- Council Resolution #052, Series of 2020, Land Use Enforcement During
Covid-19
Exhibit F- Land Use Application
166
1
RESOLUTION #067
(SERIES OF 2020)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE
EXTENSION OF A TEMPORARY USE APPROVAL AT 433 E. DURANT AVENUE,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 6, ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN
COUNTY, COLORADO
Parcel ID: 2737-182-85-006
WHEREAS,the Community Development Department received an application from
Chris Bendon of BendonAdams, LLC, on behalf of G.A. Resort Condo. Association, Inc., c/o
Hyatt Residence Club, Bob Weisman, President, requesting an extension of a 2019 Temporary
Use approval to install a temporary, portable, outdoor ice-skating rink refrigeration system
through the 2020/2021 ski season, contingent upon the active development of plans and a land
use application for the future use of the site; and
WHEREAS, via Ordinance #12, Series 1992, the site was previously approved as a Park
and Ice-Skating Rink to provide a public amenity and open space in conjunction with the
development of the Aspen Mountain Subdivision and the lodge property presently known as the
Grant Hyatt Aspen; and,
WHEREAS,via Resolution #091, Series of 2019, the applicant received approval to
locate a temporary chiller on the site to produce an ice rink from November 21, 2019 to March
31, 2020; and
WHEREAS,the onset of COVID-19 prevented the applicant from removing the
equipment by the deadline established in Resolution #091, Series of 2019. Through Resolution
#045, Series of 2020, Council approved an extension until September 17, 2020 and is now asked
to consider another extension through Winter 2020/2021; and
WHEREAS,the Community Development Director reviewed the request according to
the criteria of Section 26.450, Temporary Uses, provided in the Aspen Municipal Code, and
recommended Council grant the extension, with conditions; and
WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal
under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and
considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and
considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on August 25, 2020; and,
WHEREAS,the City Council finds that the request to be in accordance with the
applicable development standards and approves an Extension of Temporary Use for one-
hundred and eighty (180) days, contingent upon the active development of plans and a land
use application for the future use of the site; and,
167
2
WHEREAS,the City Council finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the
promotion of public health, safety and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1:
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
City Council hereby approves an Extension of Temporary Use request to allow the portable,
outdoor ice-skating rink refrigeration system already in place to remain on the site in the
current configuration for one-hundred and eighty (180) days. The 180 days will commence
on October 12, 2020 the expiration date of Resolution #052, Series of 2020, which granted
relief from enforcement of certain land use provisions as a result of COVID-19. The
expiration of the Temporary Use shall be April 10, 2021.
The temporary, portable, outdoor ice-skating rink refrigeration system shall be out of
operation at all times that the ice rink is not in use, and the existing screening around the
equipment shall remain in place at all times. These restrictions shall not prevent any
necessary maintenance of the unit. Following any maintenance activities, the unit and site
shall be returned to its original, approved condition.
Section 2:
The approved Extension of Temporary Use does not modify the existing approved use of the site as
described in Ordinance #12, Series 1992. By March 1, 2021, the applicant is required to submit a
complete land use application requesting another extension, or proposing an alternative. Upon
expiration of the Extension of Temporary Use, if no other request has been granted, the site shall be
returned to its condition prior to the Temporary Use approval as described in Ordinance #12, Series
1992.
Section 3:
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
temporary use proposal as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented
before the City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the
same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 4:
This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such priorordinances.
Section 5:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
168
3
APPROVED BY theCityCouncil of theCityof Aspen on this 25
th day of August, 2020.
Attest:
_______________________________________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk Torre, Mayor
Approved as toform:
____________________________________
James R. True, City Attorney
169
1
Exhibit A
Staff Findings
26.450.050. Duration and expiration of a temporary use.
B. Extensions.The City Council may grant extension(s) of an approved temporary use.
The Community Development Director may grant one extension of an approved
insubstantial temporary use. Requests for an extension of a temporary use approved by
City Council must be submitted in writing to the Community Development Director no less
than fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration of a permitted temporary use. Requests for an
extension of an insubstantial temporary use approved by the Community Development
Director must be submitted in writing to the Community Development Director no less than
three (3) days prior to the expiration of a permitted insubstantial temporary use.
All proposed extensions of a temporary use or insubstantial temporary use shall be
evaluated under the same criteria as set forth in Sections 26.450.030 and 26.450.040.
Requests for an extension of time approved by the City Council shall be heard and approved
or denied at a public hearing. Extension of a temporary use approved by City Council shall
not exceed one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days in a 12-month period. Extension of
an insubstantial temporary use approved by the Community Development Director shall not
exceed seven (7) consecutive days in a 12-month period.
Staff Response: The applicant submitted a timely request to extend the Temporary
Use approval granted by City Council via Resolution #045, Series of 2020. Evaluation
of the extension as set forth in Sections 26.450.030 and 26.450.040 is provided below.
Staff recommends the maximum extension that can be granted in one action, which
is a period of 180 days.
Section 26.450.030. Criteria applicable to all temporary
uses.
When considering a development application for a temporary use or an insubstantial
temporary use, the Community Development Director or City Council shall consider,
among other pertinent factors, the following criteria as they or any of them, relate thereto:
A. The location, size, design, operating characteristics and visual impacts of the
proposed use.
Staff Response: The location of the refrigeration unit against two walls, at the rear
of the site, and adjacent to required electrical and mechanical locations is the most
appropriate available. The location concentrates visual and noise impacts from
the mechanical equipment in one area and ensures the impacts of the unit on the
use of the site and appearance from public rights-of-way are minimized to the
extent possible.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
170
2
B. The compatibility of the proposed temporary use with the character, density and
use of structures and uses in the immediate vicinity.
Staff Response: Temporary Use has allowed the applicant to maintain the ice-
skating surface required by Ordinance #12, Series 1992. Extending the Temporary
Use approval facilitates continued work on a solution that will address Winter 2020-
2021, and hopefully beyond.
The ice rink itself is a familiar and valued feature of downtown. During the time the
chiller has been in place, no concerns have been raised to Community
Development to indicate that the temporary equipment it is in conflict with
surrounding area. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
C. The impacts of the proposed temporary use on pedestrian and vehicular traffic and
traffic patterns, municipal services, noise levels and neighborhood character.
Staff Response: As noted above, the chiller has not been found to be a nuisance
to other uses. Compliance with noise requirements in the City of Aspen Municipal
Code is measured 25 feet from the object in question. At 25 feet, the refrigeration
unit is estimated to meet the 65-decibel maximum allowed in commercial zones
during daytime hours. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
D. The duration of the proposed temporary use and whether a temporary use has
previously been approved for the structure, parcel, property or location as proposed in the
application.
Staff Response: There are no other active Temporary Uses on this property. The
site is used occasionally for permitted special events, which are approved through
the Special Event, rather than Temporary Use process. Staff finds this criterion to
be met.
E. The purposes and intent of the zone district in which the temporary use is proposed.
Staff Response: The purpose of the Park zone district, as established for the site in
the 1992 PD approval, was for the provision of public space and a recreation amenity
to serve the development and the public. The Extension of Temporary Use proposed
in this application meets the intent of the zone district in the sense that it is intended
to facilitate future ice rink use or the development of an alternative plan. Staff finds
this criterion to be met.
F. The relation of the temporary use to conditions and character changes which
may have occurred in the area and zone district in which the use is proposed.
Staff Response: The chiller was approved to restore the rink on this site after the
original ice equipment, and a synthetic ice surface both failed to perform as needed.
The applicant has stated a desire to explore options for the future use of the site.
171
3
The proposed Extension of Temporary Use would provide a stop-gap measure to
ensure the site continues to provide the public space and amenity required in the
PD approval. The eventual expiration or abandonment of the Temporary Use would
be in conjunction with the development of a Council-approved permanent use of the
site. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
G. How the proposed temporary use will enhance or diminish the general public
health, safety or welfare.
Staff Response: The proposed Extension of Temporary Use meets the requirement
that the site provide public space and recreation amenities which enhance the public
health, safety and welfare. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
26.450.040. Conditions of approval.
Upon review and approval by the Community Development Director or City Council, as set
forth at Section 26.450.060 herein, the temporary use approval may be conditioned as
deemed necessary to protect the integrity of the zone district and the surrounding uses and
structures in the neighborhood in which a temporary use is to be permitted. This may
include, but is not limited to, setting requirements for or imposing restrictions upon size,
bulk, location, open space, landscaping, buffering, screening, lighting, noise, signage,
parking, operations, hours of operation, set-backs, building materials and requiring such
financial security as deemed necessary to ensure compliance with any or all conditions of
approval and/or to restore the subject property to its original use and condition.
Staff Response: Staff recommends the chiller remain out of operation and
screened, except when the ice rink is in use, and that Council direct the applicant
to submit for another extension or a PD Amendment proposing a permanent
solution, no later than March 1, 2021.
172
Page 1 of 4
April 2, 2019
Mr. David Massarano, President
G.A Resort Condominium Association, Inc.
c/o Hyatt Residence Club, Grand Aspen
415 E. Dean Street
Aspen, CO 18611
(Via Certified Mail)
RE: Silver City Ice Rink Status
Dear Mr. Massarano,
On November 19, 2018, the City approved an application for an Insubstantial Planned Development (PD)
Amendment to the Aspen Mountain Planned Development. The amendment was proposed for the specific
purpose of replacing the ice on the Silver City Ice Rink with a synthetic substitute. The approval was
recorded on November 21, 2018, and is attached to this letter as Exhibit “A”. The purpose of this letter is
to inform you that numerous complaints have been submitted to the City regarding the amendment and
that following a review of the approval, the Community Development Department has determined that the
amendment was inappropriately issued and that the approval of the amendment is hereby revoked and
deemed void.
Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.110.A.1, the criteria to grant an Insubstantial PD Amendment,
includes a requirement that “[t]he request does not change the use or character of the development.” The
substitute for ice being used is a “synthetic” ice known as “Global Synthetic Ice Super-Glide SLICK.” The
application represented that this material would function substantially similar to ice and that “[f]or a casual
skater, the most notable difference would be the lack of wet and cold.”
Specific statements, with emphasis added, which led the City to approve this application, included:
• “A warming climate has presented challenges in maintaining a natural ice skating surface
throughout the winter season. This environmentally-friendly alternative will allow rink operations to
maintain the hours and window of operation mandated in the project approvals. Moreover, this will
allow visitors and locals to continue the outdoor winter experience of skating with their children
and friends under the shadow of Aspen Mountain.” Page 2 of Application Cover Letter.
• “Synthetic ice is used in public ice skating rinks all over the world. The natural ice would be replaced
with Global Synthetic Ice Super-Glide SLICK™ material, which has been successfully used at the
torch lighting of the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics and for NHL celebrity games. Video of the product
in use can be found here – www.globalsyntheticice.com.” Page 2 of Application Cover Letter.
• “The rink will be replaced with Super-Glide SLICK material. The synthetic ice has been successfully
skated on at the Sochi Olympic Touch Lighting, NHL celebrity games, and public rinks around the
world. For a casual ice skater, the most notable difference will be the lack of wet and cold.” Review
Criteria Responses, 26.445.110.A.2. “The rink faces current operational challenges as a result of using
173
Silver City Ice Rink Status Letter
Page 2 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | F: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
natural ice in a changing climate. Approvals state the rink be operational seven days a week from
Thanksgiving to the end of March. Synthetic ice will allow rink operators to respond to the technical
challenge presented by solar gain. Arguably, global warming was known in the 90ies but synthetic
ice was likely not considered as a viable option at that time. The engineering of synthetic ice has
improved 10-fold since it’s advent several decades ago, allowing it to be considered for a suitable
skating surface for a public skating rink.” Review Criteria Responses, 26.445.110.A.4.
Further, the Hyatt indicated that the material proposed for the ice rink was chosen because of its similarity
to natural ice, and the fact that the United States is phasing out the use of CFC-22 coolant, which is used
to cool the original ice rink.
After a season of use, the City has determined that this synthetic ice has changed the character of the
development, which is inconsistent with the requirements for the Insubstantial PD Amendment. While the
product has been used in international skating rinks and events, what was not included in the application,
nor in the information available during the land use review process on the company’s website, is the fact
that this surface is fundamentally different than natural ice. The friction of synthetic ice compared to
natural ice is indisputably higher. Granted, experienced skaters may be able to train with a higher degree
of efficiency given this greater resistance and even beginner skaters may learn to be better skaters by
training on this surface. However, the purpose of the rink was to provide a skating experience to casual
skaters and families. The casual skater is not able to glide as if on ice, and their experience is more like
walking on a plastic surface than a gliding on an ice surface. It is factually false to say that “the most notable
difference will be the lack of wet and cold.” The evidence is clear that casual skaters are not able to skate.
Following the complaints received directly by the City of Aspen, we contacted CP Burger as the
operator of the rink for additional information, and they provided additional information regarding
complaints and refund requests that they had received. Attached as Exhibit B are copies of numerous
complaints that have been received by the City, as well as those passed on to the City. A few quotes
from these complaints include:
•“How disappointing that we have PLASTIC, rather than ICE, for ice skating. This may be acceptable
for ‘Holidays in Maui’ … but it sure is dismal for THE BEST, most iconic and highest profile Winter
destination in the U S of A.”
•“I am writing to you to express my great disappointment that we have lost our cherished Silver City
Ice rink. It has been replaced by some plastic “space” that produces nothing but ridicule from
passing pedestrians, and sadness from anyone who tried to use it.”
•“My daughter can’t skate is not ice. She was disappointed.”
•“We’ve been coming up from Glenwood for years and were surprised to see fake ice, not real ice.
We’re pretty good skaters & couldn’t skate on the fake ice. We were very disappointed!”
•“We were very disappointed to find the ice rink at the Hyatt now has synthetic ice! Arrived with our
small children who had their brand new figure skates & told we/they could not use them. We came
(and have come for the past four years) for traditional ice and a true Aspen/Christmas experience.
From now on, we’ll be skating at the ARC. This is not real skating!”
•“I brought my family out here for ice skating came to find out we were on plastic not ice, not working
out at all. Ice is better.”
•“The ice rink doesn’t slide properly. Me and my two brothers tried to ice skate, however, it is
impossible to slide on the fake ice.”
174
Silver City Ice Rink Status Letter
Page 3 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | F: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
• “Please add the ice back to the ice rink! Ridiculous & terrible this year!”
• “Synthetic ice is very hard to skate on – was not expecting being unable to skate.”
• “Refund! This is terrible! My kids are literally crying bc they can’t skate on this!”
• “NO ICE! The kids want to skate no walk on plastic!”
Attached as Exhibit C are a number of pictures taken on March 18, 2019, which show the surface of the
synthetic ice damaged from clearing of snow. This type of damage is not seen on real ice, and again, creates
a change to the character of the area.
Land Use Code Section 26.104.050, Void Permits, states as follows:
“All persons are presumed to know the terms and requirements of this Title and the extent
of the legal authority of the City and its employees, boards and commissions to issue
development approvals or permits. Any permit or approval issued in error or otherwise not
in conformity with the requirements of this Title, shall be void. Similarly, any permit or
approval issued in reliance upon or as a result of, a materially false statement or
representation made in the process of obtaining the permit or development approval shall,
likewise, be void. Any person having received a void or voidable permit or approval shall
not be relieved from having to comply with all applicable terms and conditions of this Title
and the City shall not be estopped from fully enforcing same.”
We recognize that the statements made were not made with the intention of misleading the City. Further,
we recognize that phasing out the use of CFC-22 coolant may be environmentally appropriate.
Nonetheless, the evidence clearly indicates that the statements which led to the issuance of the
amendment were materially false, thus changing the use and character or the initial approval.
Consequently, the City must consider the issuance of the approval as in error; thus, the approval is hereby
deemed void. Ice, created by refrigeration and/or the natural environment, pursuant to the original project
approvals, is required for the next winter season. Although CFC 22 is being phased out, numerous
replacements are available and should not delay the return of an ice surface.
Given the circumstances, the City is happy to work with you to ensure necessary building permit review
and issuance in time for the 2019-2020 winter season. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if
you would like to meet to discuss the permitting process.
Best,
Jessica Garrow, AICP
City of Aspen
Community Development Director
130 S Galena Street
970.429.2780
Jessica.Garrow@cityofaspen.com
175
Silver City Ice Rink Status Letter
Page 4 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5000 | F: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
Exhibits:
Exhibit A: Copy of approval of Insubstantial Development Approval.
Exhibit B: Copies of complaints and refund requests
Exhibit C: March 18, 2019 Pictures of Silver City Ice Rink
CC:
Sara Ott, City of Aspen, Acting City Manager
James R. True, City of Aspen, City Attorney
Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, Owners Representative (via email)
176
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 3 177
Exhibit A
Page 2 of 3 178
Exhibit A
Page 3 of 3 179
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 27 180
Exhibit B
Page 2 of 27 181
Exhibit B
Page 3 of 27 182
Exhibit B
Page 4 of 27 183
Exhibit B
Page 5 of 27 184
Exhibit B
Page 6 of 27 185
Exhibit B
Page 7 of 27 186
Exhibit B
Page 8 of 27 187
Exhibit B
Page 9 of 27 188
Exhibit B
Page 10 of 27 189
Exhibit B
Page 11 of 27 190
Exhibit B
Page 12 of 27 191
Exhibit B
Page 13 of 27 192
Exhibit B
Page 14 of 27 193
Exhibit B
Page 15 of 27 194
Exhibit B
Page 16 of 27 195
Exhibit B
Page 17 of 27 196
Exhibit B
Page 18 of 27 197
Exhibit B
Page 19 of 27 198
Exhibit B
Page 20 of 27 199
Exhibit B
Page 21 of 27 200
Exhibit B
Page 22 of 27 201
Exhibit B
Page 23 of 27 202
Exhibit B
Page 24 of 27 203
Exhibit B
Page 25 of 27 204
Exhibit B
Page 26 of 27 205
Exhibit B
Page 27 of 27 206
Exhibit C: Photos of Surface dates March 18, 2019
207
208
209
210
5
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 09, 2020
Councilwoman Mullins motioned to approve Resolution #026; Councilwoman Richards seconded.
Mayor Torre won’t be supporting this and would prefer a typical neighborhood setback standard.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, no. 4-1, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #08, SERIES OF 2020 - Comcast Franchise Agreement and Customer Service Standards
Jim True
Mr. True said this item started several years ago when the franchise agreement terminated at the end of
2017 and negotiations have been taking place ever since. We now feel this is acceptable and in the best
interests for the City of Aspen.
APPLICANT PRESENTATION: Ken Fellman and Andy Davis
Mr. Fellman said the city would not benefit by doing a shorter term. There were some FCC restriction
negotiations and it was unclear who would get the upper hand. The most recent FCC restrictions have
limited what governments can do and Aspen is a part of this. Mr. Fellman is a petitioner in this court
appeal. Mr. True pointed out that we are talking about an eight-year term to coincide with other
communities.
Mr. Davis gave an update on the latest features of Comcast and their response to COVID-19.
Mayor Torre opened the public hearing.
Public hearing is closed.
Councilwoman Richards motioned to approve Ordinance #08, Series of 2020; Councilwoman Mullins
seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0, motion carried.
Councilwoman Mullins motioned to approve Resolution #046, Series of 2020; Councilwoman Richards
seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0, motion carried.
RESOLUTION #045, SERIES OF 2020 – Extension of Temporary Use, Silver City Ice Rink, 433 E. Durant
Avenue
Amy Simon
Ms. Simon said the equipment, which is used on the ice, uses a chemical which needs to be phased out
this year. We came to council last fall for alternatives. They may decide to reprogram the space in the
future, but in the meantime, they had asked council for temporary use of a large chiller. The chiller sits
in a corner of the property. That temporary use approval was to only last until March 31st, but due to
COVID-19, they couldn’t do the work, so they’ve asked for a 180-day extension, which is all that council
is allowed to grant. The applicant would like a longer extension.
APPLICANT PRESENTATION: Chris Bendon of Bendon Adams
Mr. Bendon said their budgeting has changed for the year and the cost for the unit for an entire year, is
less than moving it twice. They will need to use this chiller through the next winter.
211
6
REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 09, 2020
Councilman Hauenstein said he wondered why the applicant can’t just wait and apply for a temporary
use in the fall and do it at once. Ms. Simon explained the code and why they need to extend it now.
Councilwoman Richards said it’s her goal to keep the ice for the next winter and she is in favor of
supporting the extension.
Jim True explained that it doesn’t make sense to move the chiller and bring it back in the fall because it
costs more to do that, which is why staff recommended an extension.
Councilwoman Richards moved to approve the Resolution #045; Councilwoman Mullins seconded.
Mr. Bendon asked if they could have this approved through September 31st instead and Ms. Simon said
no. Mr. Supino said they will work with him on the enforcement side of things.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0 motion carried.
Councilman Hauenstein motioned to adjourn, Mayor Torre seconded.
Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0, motion carried.
______________________
Nicole Henning, City Clerk
212
RESOLUTION#45
SERIES OF 2020)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE
EXTENSION OF A TEMPORARY USE APPROVAL AT 433 E. DURANT AVENUE,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 6,ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN
COUNTY, COLORADO
Parcel ID: 2737-182-85-006
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from
Chris Bendon of BendonAdams, LLC, on behalf of G.A. Resort,Condo. Association, Inc., c/o
Hyatt Residence Club, Bob Weisman, President, requesting an extension of a 2019 Temporary
Use approval to install a temporary, portable, outdoor ice-skating rink refrigeration system
through the 2020/2021 ski season, contingent upon the active development of plans and a land
use application for the future use of the site; and
WHEREAS, via Ordinance #12, Series 1992, the site was previously approved as a Park
and Ice-Skating Rink to provide a public amenity and open space in conjunction with the
development of the Aspen Mountain Subdivision and the lodge property presently known as the
Grant Hyatt Aspen; and,
WHEREAS, via Resolution #91, Series of 2019, the applicant received approval to
locate a temporary chiller on the site to produce an ice rink from November 21, 2019 to March
31, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the onset of COVID-19 prevented the applicant from removing the
equipment by the deadline established in Resolution #91, Series of 2019. The applicant
requested an extension through Winter 2021, which is beyond the maximum extension that
Council may approve in one action; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director reviewed the request according to
the criteria of Section 26.450, Temporary Uses, provided in the Aspen Municipal Code, and
recommended Council grant the maximum extension of 180 days,with conditions;and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal
under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and
considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and
considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on June 9, 2020; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the request to be in accordance with the
applicable development standards and approves an Extension of Temporary Use for one-
hundred and eighty (180) days, contingent upon the active development of plans and a land
use application for the future use of the site; and,
1
213
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the
promotion of public health, safety and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1•
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
City Council hereby approves an Extension of Temporary Use request to allow the portable,
outdoor ice-skating rink refrigeration system already in place to remain on the site in the
current configuration for one-hundred and eighty (180) days, from March 31St, 2020 (the
expiration of the previously approved Temporary Use)to September 17, 2020.
The temporary, portable, outdoor ice-skating rink refrigeration system shall be out of
operation at all times during this period, and the existing screening around the equipment
shall remain in place at all times. These restrictions shall not prevent any necessary
maintenance of the unit. Following any maintenance activities, the unit and site shall be
returned to its original, approved condition.
Section 2:
The approved Extension of Temporary Use does not modify the existing approved use of the site as
described in Ordinance #12, Series 1992. By July 1St°2020, the applicant is required to submit a
complete land use application requesting another extension, or proposing an alternative. Upon
expiration of the Extension of Temporary Use, if no other request has been granted, the site shall be
returned to its condition prior to the Temporary Use approval as described in Ordinance #12, Series
1992.
Section
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
temporary use proposal as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented
before the City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the
same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
This.rreesoolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 5:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
2
214
APPROVED BY the City Council of the City of Aspen on this 91h day of June, 2020.
Attest:
9
WiOE'
Nicole Henning,C' Clerk Torre,Mayor
Approved as to form:
J es R. True, City Attorney
3
215
216
217
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
June 22, 2020
Ms. Amy Simon
Interim Planning Director
City of Aspen
130 So. Galena St.
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Silver Circle Ice Rink – Temporary Use
Ms. Simon:
Please accept this application for a
Temporary Use for the Silver Circle Ice Rink.
The City of Aspen approved a previous
Temporary Use for the 2019-2020 winter
season to allow for a chiller to be placed
adjacent to the rink to allow for natural ice to
be used. Due to complications with COVID-
19, the chiller was not removed at the end of
the winter season and still exists on the
property. A 170-day extension of the
Temporary Use was granted by City Council
enabling the device to remain on-site through
September 17, 2020.
The applicant is pursuing an amendment to the Planned Development to provide a
permanent, brick enclosure around the ground-mounted chiller. Timing for the PD
Amendment and permitting will likely require installation of the permanent enclosure in
the 2021 building season. This Temporary Use application is intended to enable the
chiller and ice rink operation through the 20/21 winter season. The chiller unit used for
the 20/21 season will be the same unit as used in the 19/20 season.
The ground-mounted chiller powers the natural ice system and was not able to be
installed sub-surface due to its size. The unit is roughly 17 feet long and about 7.5 feet
tall, plus a platform base. Existing placement and screening details are provided in Exhibit
13. This location represents the least-impactful location regarding aesthetics and sound.
218
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
A screening wall was developed around the unit for aesthetics and to mitigate noise, as
previously requested by City of Aspen staff and City Council.
The location was selected to be away from the restaurant and from the bus loading area
with minimal landscape changes required for its installation. The images below show the
placement of the existing chiller.
The unit has a listed operating sound level of 67dBa, measured from 30 feet away. This
figure was confirmed by the installer and is roughly the sound level of an idling RFTA bus.
The system comes with “super-quiet” fans and the installer utilized additional sound
blankets inside the frame of the device to further baffle sound. Noise from the unit was
negligible in the 19/20 season.
This temporary use application seeks approval for the chiller to remain in place through
the end of the 2021 winter season. The unit will remain dormant through the summer and
fall and activated for the winter season. Please reach out if you have questions about this
ground-mount system that we or the installer can answer.
Kind Regards,
Chris Bendon, AICP
BendonAdams LLC
Attachments:
1. Response to Review Criteria
2. COA Land Use Application
3. Pre-Application Conference Summary
4. Letter of Authorization
5. Proof of Ownership
6. Agreement to Pay
7. HOA Form
8. Vicinity Map
9. City Council Resolution 45-2020
10. Site Plan and Pictures
219
Ex. 1, Page 1
Exhibit 1
Review Criteria
26.450.030. Criteria applicable to all temporary uses. When considering a development application for a
temporary use or an insubstantial temporary use, the Community Development Director or City Council
shall consider, among other pertinent factors, the following criteria as they or any of them, relate thereto:
A. The location, size, design, operating characteristics and visual impacts of the proposed use.
Response: The temporary use will mimic the existing character of the development and
has already been approved by the City in September 2019, which allowed for the chiller to
be installed and screened utilizing existing electricity operations on site and with
additional sound mitigation panels.
B. The compatibility of the proposed temporary use with the character, density and use of structures and
uses in the immediate vicinity.
Response: The chiller allows for natural ice to be utilized on-site and is necessary for
ongoing operations of this manner. The applicant is requesting that the chiller be allowed
to remain in place through the end of the 20/21 winter season. The chiller is properly
screened to staff’s satisfaction and has proven to be effective in its current location.
C. The impacts of the proposed temporary use on pedestrian and vehicular traffic and traffic patterns,
municipal services, noise levels and neighborhood character.
Response: The chiller is placed away from the RFTA bus stops and CP Burger, reducing
impacts to pedestrians. It is located next to a stairway up to the Hyatt property, but is
heavily screened and due to additional noise mitigation, further reducing noise levels and
impacts. The chiller is located on the interior portion of the property and does not affect
vehicular traffic or traffic patterns.
D. The duration of the proposed temporary use and whether a temporary use has previously been
approved for the structure, parcel, property or location as proposed in the application.
Response: The chiller was previously approved in Fall 2019 and Spring 2020 and the
current proposal is to stay in its current condition and location through the end of the
20/21 season.
E. The purposes and intent of the zone district in which the temporary use is proposed.
Response: The Public zone district allows for civic uses and includes a public park as one
of the allowed uses.
F. The relation of the temporary use to conditions and character changes which may have occurred in the
area and zone district in which the use is proposed.
Response: The request for the temporary use is to enable a more-permanent screening
system to be approved, permitted, and built. These activities will not be complete by
220
Ex. 1, Page 2
November 2020, when the ice rink needs to be operation. The applicant is requesting the
chiller be allowed to remain in place through the end of the 20’-21’ winter season.
G. How the proposed temporary use will enhance or diminish the general public health, safety or welfare.
Response: The public will continue to be able to enjoy this public amenity either as a
skating facility or as a semi passive park.
221
Silver Circle Ice Rink - Temporary Use
2737-182-85-006
G.A. Resort Condominium Association, Inc., c/o Hyatt Residence Club; Bob Weisman, President
415 E. Dean Street; Aspen, CO 81611
970-429-9100 rwweisman@gmail.com
BendonAdams
300 So. Spring St. #202; Aspen, CO 81611
925.2855 chris@bendonadams.com
Lot 6 of the Aspen Mountain Subdivision was granted approval to develop a synthetic ice surface
for wintertime use. The approval was revoked after installation. The application seeks a
temporary winter garden with either synthetic ice, natural ice but without a chiller, or a non ice
surface for a semi-passive winter park.
na na na
na na
1,300
Exhibit 2
222
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Amy Simon, Community Development Department,
amy.simon@cityofaspen.com
DATE: 6.16.2020
PROPERTY: 433 E. Durant Avenue, Silver City Ice Rink
REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, chris@bendonadams.com
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Extension of Temporary Use
DESCRIPTION: The Hyatt Grand Aspen is the owner of Lot 6 of the Aspen Mountain PD. According
to the 1992 PD approval allowing the existing development, Lot 6 is to function as a community activity
center and seasonal public ice skating rink.
In 2018/2019, after the original ice-making equipment installed to serve this property became
problematic, the Hyatt attempted the use of a synthetic ice system. Problems with the functionality of
the synthetic surface led to a Temporary Use approval granted by City Council on September 9, 2019
via Resolution #91, Series of 2019, for the installation of an updated chiller to create ice for the rink during
the 2019/2020 winter season. This chiller, somewhat conspicuously located adjacent to the rink, was
intended to be a short-term solution.
The Temporary Use approval expired on March 31, 2020, at which time the property owner was to
remove the mechanical equipment. The on-set of Covid-19 prevented this work from taking place before
the deadline. On June 9, 2020, City Council granted an extension of the approval to September 17,
2020 via Resolution #45, Series of 2020. The refrigeration system is allowed to remain in the current
configuration, but shall be out of operation at all times during this period, and the existing screening
around the equipment shall remain in place at all times. These restrictions shall not prevent any
necessary maintenance of the unit.
By July 1st, 2020, the applicant is required to submit a complete land use application requesting another
extension, or proposing an alternative. This pre-application addresses a request for an extension. A
separate pre-app will be prepared for the option of a PD Amendment.
Council may have the latitude to grant another Temporary Use Extension if they find it to meet the
review criteria, however Planning Staff believes that the code language on this topic can be interpreted
to say that only one extension per consecutive 12 months is permitted. At the least, it is clear that the
maximum extension is 180 days.
Relevant Land Use Code Section(s):
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.312 Commercial Design Standards
26.450 Temporary and Seasonal Uses
Exhibit 3
223
Land Use Code:
https://www.cityofaspen.com/191/Municipal-Code.
Land Use Application:
https://www.cityofaspen.com/DocumentCenter/View/1835/Land-Use-Application-Packet-2017.
Review by:
• Staff for complete application and recommendation
• Public hearing before City Council for approval
Planning Fees: $1,300 Deposit for 4 hours of staff time (additional planning hours are
billed at a rate of $325/hour)
Referral Fees: none
Total Deposit: $1,300
To apply, please submit a single pdf document with the following information to
amy.simon@cityofaspen.com.
Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement.
Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).
Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur.
Proof of ownership in the form of a title commitment or a letter from an attorney licensed in the
state of Colorado
HOA Compliance form
Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states
the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of
the applicant.
A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of
how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development
application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property.
Pictures of the existing Temporary Use in place.
A sketch plan of the site showing property lines and existing and proposed features relevant to
the temporary use and its relationship to uses and structures in the immediate vicinity.
An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
224
Once the copy is deemed complete by staff, the deposit fee will be requested.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based
on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may
or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
225
Exhibit 4226
Land Title Guarantee Company
Customer Distribution
PREVENT FRAUD - Please remember to call a member of our closing team when
initiating a wire transfer or providing wiring instructions.
Order Number:BANA62010520-2 Date: 04/21/2020
Property Address:433 E DURANT AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611
PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS
For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance
Land Title Roaring Fork Valley Title
Team
200 BASALT CENTER CIRCLE
BASALT, CO 81621
PO BOX 3440
(970) 927-0405 (Work)
(970) 925-0610 (Work Fax)
valleyresponse@ltgc.com
Buyer/Borrower
GA RESORT CONDO ASSOC
140 FOUNTAIN PKWY # 570
ST PETERSBURG, FL 33716
Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery
CHIRS BENDON
Attention: CHIRS BENDON
CHRIS@BENDONADAMS.COM
Delivered via: Electronic Mail
Mortgage Broker
DAVIS MASSARANO
Attention: DAVIS MASSARANO
(832) 563-4042 (Cell)
DAVID@MASSARANOLAW.COM
Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery
Exhibit 5
227
Order Number:BANA62010520-2 Date: 04/21/2020
Property Address:433 E DURANT AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611
Chain of Title Documents:
Pitkin county recorded 12/21/2005 under reception no.
518732
Pitkin county recorded 12/19/2005 under reception no.
518619
Plat Map(s):
Pitkin county recorded 02/09/1993 at book 30 page 69
228
This Report is based on a limited search of the county real property records and provides the name(s) of the
vested owner(s), the legal description, tax information (taken from information provided by the county treasurer
on its website) and encumbrances, which, for the purposes of this report, means deed of trust and mortgages,
and liens recorded against the property and the owner(s) in the records of the clerk and recorder for the county
in which the subject is located. This Report does not constitute any form of warranty or guarantee of title or title
insurance. The liability of Land Title Guarantee Company is strictly limited to (1) the recipient of the Report, and
no other person, and (2) the amount paid for the report.
Prepared For:
DAVIS MASSARANO
This Report is dated:
04/20/2020 at 5:00 P.M.
Address:
433 E DURANT AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611
Legal Description:
LOT 6,
ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION,
ACCORDING TO THE SEVENTH AMENDED PLAT OF ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1993 IN BOOK 30 AT PAGE 69.
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
Record Owner:
GA RESORT CONDO ASSOC
We find the following documents of record affecting subject property:
***************** PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION **********************
Parcel No.: 273718285006
2018 Land Assessed Value $1,286,300.00
2019 Improvements Assessed Value $30,200.00
2010 real property taxes PAID in the amount of $13,762.40.
****************************************************************
1.SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 19, 2005 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 518619 AND
RERECORDED DECEMBER 21, 2005 AS RECEPTION NO. 518732.
NO ENCUMBRANCES
Land Title Guarantee Company
Full Property Report
Order Number:BANA62010520-2
229
Exhibit 6230
Exhibit 7231
Exhibit 8
433 E. Durant St. (Silver Circle Ice Rink) – Vicinity Map
232
RESOLUTION#45
SERIES OF 2020)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE
EXTENSION OF A TEMPORARY USE APPROVAL AT 433 E. DURANT AVENUE,
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 6,ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN
COUNTY, COLORADO
Parcel ID: 2737-182-85-006
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from
Chris Bendon of BendonAdams, LLC, on behalf of G.A. Resort,Condo. Association, Inc., c/o
Hyatt Residence Club, Bob Weisman, President, requesting an extension of a 2019 Temporary
Use approval to install a temporary, portable, outdoor ice-skating rink refrigeration system
through the 2020/2021 ski season, contingent upon the active development of plans and a land
use application for the future use of the site; and
WHEREAS, via Ordinance #12, Series 1992, the site was previously approved as a Park
and Ice-Skating Rink to provide a public amenity and open space in conjunction with the
development of the Aspen Mountain Subdivision and the lodge property presently known as the
Grant Hyatt Aspen; and,
WHEREAS, via Resolution #91, Series of 2019, the applicant received approval to
locate a temporary chiller on the site to produce an ice rink from November 21, 2019 to March
31, 2020; and
WHEREAS, the onset of COVID-19 prevented the applicant from removing the
equipment by the deadline established in Resolution #91, Series of 2019. The applicant
requested an extension through Winter 2021, which is beyond the maximum extension that
Council may approve in one action; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director reviewed the request according to
the criteria of Section 26.450, Temporary Uses, provided in the Aspen Municipal Code, and
recommended Council grant the maximum extension of 180 days,with conditions;and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal
under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and
considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and
considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on June 9, 2020; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the request to be in accordance with the
applicable development standards and approves an Extension of Temporary Use for one-
hundred and eighty (180) days, contingent upon the active development of plans and a land
use application for the future use of the site; and,
1
Exhibit 9
233
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the
promotion of public health, safety and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1•
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
City Council hereby approves an Extension of Temporary Use request to allow the portable,
outdoor ice-skating rink refrigeration system already in place to remain on the site in the
current configuration for one-hundred and eighty (180) days, from March 31St, 2020 (the
expiration of the previously approved Temporary Use)to September 17, 2020.
The temporary, portable, outdoor ice-skating rink refrigeration system shall be out of
operation at all times during this period, and the existing screening around the equipment
shall remain in place at all times. These restrictions shall not prevent any necessary
maintenance of the unit. Following any maintenance activities, the unit and site shall be
returned to its original, approved condition.
Section 2:
The approved Extension of Temporary Use does not modify the existing approved use of the site as
described in Ordinance #12, Series 1992. By July 1St°2020, the applicant is required to submit a
complete land use application requesting another extension, or proposing an alternative. Upon
expiration of the Extension of Temporary Use, if no other request has been granted, the site shall be
returned to its condition prior to the Temporary Use approval as described in Ordinance #12, Series
1992.
Section
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
temporary use proposal as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented
before the City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the
same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
This.rreesoolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 5:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
2
234
APPROVED BY the City Council of the City of Aspen on this 91h day of June, 2020.
Attest:
9
WiOE'
Nicole Henning,C' Clerk Torre,Mayor
Approved as to form:
J es R. True, City Attorney
3
235
Ñg
ÑÑ$.$.50505050503),6%2#)2#,%)#%2).+#0"52'%2Ñg
ÑÑg
Ñ% $52!.4!6%-%4!,'5!2$2!),!2/5.$4(%0%2)-%4%2/&4(%)#%2).+Ñ!&&PLQLPXPFOHDUDQFHVQHHGHGSHULQVWDOOHUExhibit 10 236
@BendonAdams 237
238
239
240
241