Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.128 E Main St.0029.2017.AHPCE 1�1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ASPEN CASE NUMBER 0029.2017.AHPC PARCELID 273512438005 PLANNER AMY SIMON CASE DESCRIPTION MINOR HPC - ENERGY/ SAGETY UPGRADES REPRESENTATIVE BREWSTER MCLEOD ARCHITECTS INC DATE OF FINAL 10/9/2019 ACTION CLOSED BY LILLY CULVER 0 0029.2017.AHPC — Parcel 2735-124-38-005 'ermit type �hpc Aspen Historic Land Use Permit q 0029.2017.AHPC Address 128E MAIN ST Apt/Suite City ASPEN State CO Zip 81611 Permit Information Master permit Routing queue aslul5 Applied 09/01/2017 Project Status pending Approved Description Minor HPC review - undertaking renovation work throughout the existing structure. Some Issued actions require approval by the HPC before proceeding, namely energy and safety upgrades to a number of historic windows, and replacement of several non -historic Closed/Final Submitted BM Architects 379.1907 Clock Rumitg Days 0 Expires 08/27/2018 Submitted via Owner Last name I BTRSARDY LLC Fist name PO BOX 10195 PALO ALTO CA 34303 Phone (1 Address Applicant ❑ Owner is applicant? ❑ Conhactor is appicant? Last name BTRSARDY LLC Fist name PO BOX 10195 PALO ALTO CA 94303 Phone (1 Cust q 30663 Address Email Lender Last name Phone ( ) - First name Address Check 2503 — Receipt 43808 No referrals -4 1300 0 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR 128 E. MAIN STREET, LOTS P, Q, R AND S, PORTIONS OF LOTS F, G, H, AND I, AND THE ALLEY OF BLOCK 66, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #22, SERIES OF 2017 PARCEL ID: WHEREAS, the applicant, BTRSARDY, LLC, represented by Brewster McLeod Architects, submitted an application requesting Minor Development approval to alter windows and doors on the property located at 128 E. Main Street, Lots P, Q, R and S, Portions of Lots F, G, H, and 1, and the alley Block 66, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is landmark designated and located in the Main Street Historic District; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, has reviewed and considered the recommendation from Community Development, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on October 11, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission finds that the proposal meets the applicable review criteria, with conditions, and approves the request by a vote of 5 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC approves Minor Development at 128 E. Main Street as follows: 1. The applicant is to repair all historic doors and windows to the greatest extent possible. 2. The applicant is permitted to remove the existing glass in all historic windows (except those with historic art glass) and install ''/2" double pane glazing, detailed to conceal the spacer bar. The applicant has represented that the windows which are oak on the interior will feature a bronze spacer bar and those that are painted on the interior will feature a silver spacer bar. From the exterior, the face of the new glass is to be in the same plane as is the existing glass. 3. Further review by staff and monitor will be needed before any exterior storm windows may be installed over the windows with historic art glass. 4. Submit a cut sheet for review and approval by staff for the new bedroom egress window on the west fagade. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of October, 2017. 11 Nicole Henning, Deputy City Approved as to content: Gre Greenwood ' e Chair IlINIM�II�Yllll��i�11 RECEPTION#: 642616, R: $13.W, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION Pg 1 of 1, 10/26/2017 at 09:30:08 AM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 0 0 DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. BTRSARDY, LLC, P.O. Box 10195, Palo Alto, CA, 94303. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address 128 E. Main Street, Lots P, Q, R and S, Portions of Lots F, G, H, and I, and the alley Block 66, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Parcel ID #2735-124-38-005. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Approval has been granted to retrofit original windows with double paned glass and to replace or alter non -historic windows in the building. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan andlor Attachment Describing Plan Minor Development approval was granted on October 11, 2017 by the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission via Resolution #22, Series of 2017. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) November 16, 2017. Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) November 16, 2020. Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this loth day of November, 2017, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. CJ ssica Garrtj Community Deve opment Director AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: /2S mOCA-11,Iq S Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) G (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: t/ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City. of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has. been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this. ,(6 day of A& Ne� , 20#7, by - PUBLIC NOTICE . Of DEVEW MEW WROVAL N,l Is hatow given to the general puboic of the approval of a site -specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property nght pursuant to the Land Use Cade of the Clty of Aspen end Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described pprroappeerty: 128 E. Main Street, Lots P, 0 R and S, Portions of Lots F. G, H, and I, and the alley Block 66, CIIryty and Townsits of Aspen, Colorado. Parcel ID #2735-124-38.005. The property owner has received approval to retrofit 0ngi I windows with double paned glass and to re - ale rar�hlsMdc winrbws n the building. Inor Development approval was granted on Octo- ber 11, 2017 by the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission via Resolution #22, Series of 2017. The project is depicted in the land use application on file with the Cry of Aspen. For further informa- tion contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Com- munity Development Dept., 130 S. Galena St., As- pen, Colorado. (970) 429-2758. a Aspen d In The Aspen Times on November 16, 2017. (000N4739M WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My ommission expires: Notary Put I ic ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION' A-R REED PATTER80N NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY. ID #I OOMO02767 "iv Commission EWillia FebhUq 15, 2020 W.A. • MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 128 E. Main Street- Minor Development, Public Hearing DATE: October 11, 2017 SUMMARY: 128 E. Main Street, commonly known as the Sardy House, was built in 1891. The property is a local landmark and sited within the Main Street Historic District. 128 E. Main is one of only four brick Victorian era mansions remaining in Aspen (the others being Aspen Historical Society, 201 W. Francis and St. Mary's Rectory.) J.W. Atkinson, part owner of the Little Annie mine, built the home using bricks from his father's brickyard, which was established in 1888 and located on North Mill Street. The Sardy family owned the home from 1945 to 1985. Tom and Alice Rachel Sardy built a legacy in Aspen as operators of Aspen Lumber Supply and Mortuary, and by serving as elected officials and volunteers. Aspen's airport, Sardy field, Sardy's effort to improve air service to Aspen. Fo- FK was named in honor of Tom Above is the oldest photo staff has located featuring the Sardy House, dated 1952 and found in the Denver Public Library's Western History Collection. The front fagade of the structure appears to have changed very little since this picture was taken. Like other downtown structures, the use of this building has varied in its history. In the mid 80s, Frank Peters and Daniel Delano bought the property from the Sardy's and created a hotel, including the construction of an addition at the rear of the site. Today, the northernmost part of the structure, separated from the rest of the building by an upper level bridge, is considered to be a boarding house, offered for overnight lodging, and the remainder of the property is a single family house. 1 P8 ! 0 W.A. Last year, the property changed hands and the new owner is undertaking significant repairs, from deteriorated exterior wood work and roofing to new mechanical systems and landscape. Staff and the Building Department will work with the applicant to permit repairs that restore or maintain the building. HPC is to be consulted on alterations. The items before the board at this meeting are: • Replacement of non -historic glass in historic windows and doors with thermal glass. • Replacement of non -historic "glue -chip" with custom thermal stained-glass, thermal clear glass, or the addition of a storm window. • Installation of exterior storm windows over other historic stained glass windows • Reconfiguration of one historic window that doesn't meet building code standards for egress • Reconfiguration of a limited number of windows and doors in the non -historic addition. Staff supports the work affecting the new construction, and the work addressing egress requirements from a west facing upper floor bedroom in the historic structure. Staff does not support the request to install double pane glass in the historic window sash, finding that there are other, less intrusive options to consider first. We do not support alteration to the existing stained glass windows, which appear to be original, and find that more information is needed before installation of storm windows in any locations on the historic structure proceeds. APPLICANT: BTRSARDY, LLC, represented by Brewster McLeod Architects. ADDRESS: 128 E. Main Street, Lots P, Q, R and S, Portions of Lots F, G, H, and I, and the alley Block 66, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Parcel ID #2735-124-38-005. ZONING: MU, Mixed Use, Main Street Historic District Overlay. MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Minor Development Review is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. 2 P9 W.A. • Staff Response: The Sardy House is an iconic historic structure in Aspen; a picturesque and highly visible building that has been the scene of the community's holiday season tree lighting for over 30 years. This is a large structure with a significant number of windows; 30 in the historic building alone. All of the historic windows and doors are indicated in plans, elevations and photos prepared for HPC. The architect has identified four window types throughout the building, three of which are found in the historic structure and appear to be original. The rest are dated to the 1985 remodel. In preparing this memo, staff contacted Frank Peters, co-owner of the previous hotel. He indicated that the work he undertook included repairs to the original windows sash but he did not replace windows or glass as part of the project. The applicant requests HPC approval to retrofit all of the existing windows and doors in the historic structure with double pane glass. This is accomplished by routing out a channel in the frame to accept the thicker assembly. This practice is not out of the question in terms of a preservation technique, however staff does not support the work when compared to other alternatives which can meaningfully improve function and performance. Our concerns include the substantial amount of material to be removed, particularly for the 3/a" depth of the insulated glass that is proposed, the potential impact on the historic sash and doors in the long term by adding the new weight of the glass, and the visual impact of the double pane. The applicant is providing a mock-up that can be viewed at the HPC hearing. A significant amount of research has been undertaken by the preservation community to stem the loss of important historic fabric represented by windows. It is important to recognize that, when looking at the building envelope as a whole, windows are not the largest culprit of heat loss. Efforts to insulate at the basement and roof level should be undertaken as a higher priority. A blower door test would be helpful to diagnose the issues to be addressed. While it is important to reduce excessive air infiltration and heat loss, making the building so airtight that new moisture/condensation problems arise and there is potential for damage to the wood window components is a concern. Staff finds conflict with guideline 3.1. Staff recommends that the applicant work with a skilled carpenter to repair any deterioration of the window sash, doors and glass such as to: • Ensure that glazing putty is in good repair. • Eliminate gaps between the sash and jamb by adding v shaped bronze weather stripping. • Use a router to create bead on the bottom sash and feed through bulb weather stripping. • Check to make sure that window locks are working to maintain pressure on the weather stripping and reduce drafts. • Consider installing insulated shades or shutters on the inside of the windows to reduce heat loss. If, after completing this work, the owner is still concerned with energy efficiency, staff recommends the installation of storm windows. Traditional exterior wood storm windows can be seen in use on this house in photos dating back to at least the 70s. 3 P10 The Sardy house features a few stained glass windows in the form of oculus windows in gable ends and sash on the west and south facades. A window on the south facade, adjacent to the front porch, is stained glass with lead cames. The other examples are glass set directly in a wood frame, with no cames. The applicant has consulted with a local stained glass artist who has examined and preliminarily dated some of the windows, though a closer examination of others is needed. The windows on the front of the house clearly appear to be original. Staff supports efforts to make appropriate repairs. We do not currently support the proposal to add a glass panel or storm in front of these windows because of the potential to trap heat and speed the deterioration of the historic material. Again, we find that the heat loss specifically connected to these windows could be addressed with repairs and eliminating gaps along the perimeter of the features before making a significant alteration to them. There are two other proposals affecting the windows in the historic building for HPC to evaluate. First, on the west facade, an original window in a bedroom does not meet egress. This is illustrated on Sheet A3.03 and below. 2,. NF%TVIA VA710%-PHUMNIp 4 P11 l IV.A. i • The upper and lower sash on this original window are not equal in size. The upper sash is relatively small so that when the lower sash is lifted there is only about an 18" opening at the sill, which is of course not enough for egress. Staff can support replacement of the window indicated with a red arrow. The architect proposes to lower the position of the meeting rail to just what is needed to address the issue. A cut sheet for the new window will be required to assure that rails and stiles are similar in size to the existing design. The application includes two areas of change on the non -historic addition. These are illustrated on sheets A3.00, A3.02 and A3.03 and below. On the north side of the addition, a door is to be removed and windows repositioned. This does not create any conflict with design guidelines. Typically HPC would not want the new fenestration to be so closely related to the historic structure, but this already occurs throughout the property and it isn't a high priority to create a distinction with this current work. Hulse Z`; WORTH eee\Arim -momsui M UNF. r �. vt>g•rxra.r:�arion-ewsri�c, 5 P12 IV.A. The other proposed change to non -historic windows occurs on the west and south fagade as illustrated below. Staff recommends discussion of some middle ground between maintaining the multi -paned window design in place now and removal of all the glass divisions. The large panes of undivided glass that are proposed are beyond the dimension of any glazing found on the historic house and appear to be in conflict with guideline +ry 11M ]I = Mit 114 1.1 1 % %no.. rk4"%M. 6 P13 W.A. 0 0 In summary, staff recommends that repairs be undertaken to address concerns with the historic windows and doors as described in this memo. Any proposed storm windows must be described in further detail, reviewed by staff or HPC, and installed only if repair efforts are insufficient. Staff supports replacement of the bedroom window identified as an egress concern. Staff supports the window changes on the new addition, with the condition that there be a study of retaining some muntins to break down the scale of the window. DECISION MAKING OPTIONS: The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the application with conditions. Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2017 A. Design Guidelines B. Application Exhibit A, Design Guidelines 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. • Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operations, and groupings of windows. • Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them. • Preserve the original glass. If original Victorian era glass is broken, consider using restoration glass for the repair. 3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. • If the original is double -hung, then the replacement window must also be double -hung. If the sash have divided lights, match that characteristic as well. 3.4 When replacing an original window, use materials that are the same as the original. 7 P14 0 I V.A• 3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. • A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's casing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. • The historic profile on AspenModern properties is typically minimal. 3.8 Use a storm window to enhance energy conservation rather than replace a historic window. • Install a storm window on the interior, when feasible. This will allow the character of the original window to be seen from the public way. • If a storm window is to be installed on the exterior, match the sash design and material of the original window. It should fit tightly within the window opening without the need for sub -frames or panning around the perimeter. A storm window should not include muntins unless necessary for structure. Any muntin should be placed to match horizontal or vertical divisions of the historic window. 10.6 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. • An addition shall be distinguishable from the historic building and still be visually compatible with historic features. • A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material, or a modern interpretation of a historic style are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from historic construction to new construction. • Do not reference historic styles that have no basis in Aspen. • Consider these three aspects of an addition; form, materials, and fenestration. An addition must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. • Note that on a corner lot, departing from the form of the historic resource may not be allowed. • There is a spectrum of appropriate solutions to distinguishing new from old portions of a development. Some resources of particularly high significance or integrity may not be the right instance for a contrasting addition. 8 P15 W.A. A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT FOR 128 E. MAIN STREET, LOTS P, Q, R AND S, PORTIONS OF LOTS F, G, H, AND I, AND THE ALLEY OF BLOCK 66, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #_, SERIES OF 2017 PARCEL ID: WHEREAS, the applicant, BTRSARDY, LLC, represented by Brewster McLeod Architects, submitted an application requesting Minor Development approval to xxx windows, on the property located at 128 E. Main Street, Lots P, Q, R and S, Portions of Lots F, G, H, and I, and the alley Block 66, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is landmark designated and located in the Main Street Historic District; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, has reviewed and considered the recommendation from Community Development, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on October 11, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission finds that the proposal meets the applicable review criteria, with conditions, and approves the request by a vote of _ to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC approves Minor Development to xxx windows at 128 E. Main Street with the following conditions: 1. Submit a plan for review and approval by staff and monitor to repair all of the historic doors and windows to extend their life and improve function and energy efficiency. 2. Submit a cut sheet for review and approval by staff for the new bedroom egress window on the west fagade. 3. Restudy the proposal to replace the non -historic multipaned windows on the west and south facades to retain some muntins that break down the scale of the window. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of October, 2017. Approved as to form: Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Attest: Nicole Henning, Deputy City Clerk Approved as to content: Gretchen Greenwood, Vice Chair P16 0 4 W.A. MEMORANDUM Date: August 29, 2017 To: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 S Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Project: 128 E. Main Street Re: Minor HPC Review From: Jamie L. Brewster McLeod Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. Attachments: • Exhibit 1: Ownership and Encumbrance Report • Exhibit 2: Authorization Letter for Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 3: Pre -Application Summary • Exhibit 4: Land Use Application • Exhibit 5: Fee Agreement • Exhibit 6: HOA Compliance Form • Exhibit 7: Plans and Elevations by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 8: Window Sash Types and Door Construction by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 9: Glass Inspection by Element Architectural Glass • Exhibit 10: Glass Replacement Process by RL Woodworks and Design • Exhibit 11: Queen Anne Period Review by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 12: Reconfiguration at Alley and Connecting Element Existing and Proposed by Brewster. McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 13: Site Vicinity Map Ms. Simon — This is an application for a Minor HPC Review for Sardy House, located at 128 E. Main Street. We are requesting HPC review for the following: 1. Replacement of the non -historic glass in historic windows and doors with thermal glass while maintaining the historic frames and sashes 2. Replacement of non -historic glue -chip with custom thermal stained-glass, thermal clear glass, or exterior storm window while maintaining historic frames and sashes 3. Installation of exterior storm window over historic stained-glass 4. Reconfiguration of historic window that does not meet building code standards for egress 5. Reconfiguration windows and doors in the non -historic connecting element to eliminate divided-lites and reconfiguration of windows on the alley side of the 1985 addition. BREWSTER MCLEOD ARCHITECTS, INC. office0brewstermcleod.com — www.brewstermcleod.com 112 South Mill Street, #B Top Floor — P.O. Box 697 yen, CO 81611 — T 970/544.0130 — F 970/544.9201 126 South Oak Street, Unit A — Telluride, P 171435 — T 970/728.4300 — F 970/544.9201 W.A. 0 The Sardy House is located at 128 East Main Street (see Exhibit 13: Site Vicinity Map). The property's Pitkin County Parcel ID# is 2735-124-38-005. The property is zoned MU (Mixed Use) with an H (Historic Overlay). The H (Historic Overlay) is in recognition of the fact that (a) this property is within the Main Street Historic District, and (b) the Sardy House is an individually -designated Historic Landmark. Designation of the site and structure as an Historic Landmark was accomplished pursuant to Ordinance 4, Series of 1985. The Sardy House is owned by BTRSARDY LLC, A California Limited Liability Company (hereinafter, "the applicant"). Proof of the ownership of the property, together with the property's legal description, is provided in the attached Ownership and Encumbrance Report (see Exhibit 1). Authorization for Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. to submit this application on behalf of the applicant is provided in the letter attached as Exhibit 2. You provided us a Pre -Application Conference Summary (see Exhibit 3) which states that the applicant should address the following provisions of the Land Use Code: Common Development Review Procedures pursuant to Section 26.304 Minor Development pursuant to Section 26.415.070.0 The applicant's responses to the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code follow below: Common Development Review Procedures, Section 26.304 26.304.020 Pre -Application Conference Conference was completed on June 28, 2017; Pre -application Summary is included in this application as Exhibit 3. 26.304.030 Application and Fees Pre -Application Summary (Exhibit 3) outlines application requirements, deposit fee required, and number of copies required for application submittal: • Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement —See Exhibits 4 and 5 • Pre -Application Conference Summery —See Exhibit 3 • Street Address and Legal Description included in' the Ownership and Encumbrance Report —See Exhibit 1 • Authorization Letter to act on behalf of the applicant —See Exhibit 2 • A site improvement survey —this requirement is waived given scope of project • HOA Compliance Form —See Exhibit 6 • Written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant approvals associated with the property: o Written Description of Proposal: see "Project Proposal and Demonstration of Compliance with Review Standards" pages 4-7 of this document o Exhibit 7: Plans and Elevations, prepared by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc., indicating all glass to be replaced and all areas to be reconfigured o Exhibit 8: Window Sash Types and Door Construction, prepared by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. o Exhibit 9: Glass Inspection by Element Architectural Glass o Exhibit 10: Glass Replacement Process by RL Woodworks and Design o Exhibit 11: Queen Anne Period Review, prepared by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. o Exhibit 12: Reconfiguration at Alley and Connecting Element Existing and Proposed by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Written response to all review criteria —See "Project Proposal and Demonstration of Compliance with Review Standards" pages 4-7 of this document • An 8-1/2" x11" Vicinity Map locating the parcel with in the City of Aspen —See Exhibit 13 Minor Development, Section 26.415.070.0 Pa P1846 L� 0 W.A. Section 26.415.070.C(1) Review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for minor development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development Director that the proposed project constitutes minor development. Proposed development, described in the introduction, was determined to be "Minor Development" work during the Pre -Application Conference on June 28, 2017. Section 26.415.070:C(2)—Application Requirements All application requirements are addressed in the Pre -Application Summary. See list above detailing all exhibits provided in this application to demonstrate compliance with the review criteria. Scope of work is exempt from Residential Design Standard review as all elements of the historic residence will be replaced in existing locations with no changes to shape or size. Project Proposal and Demonstration of Compliance with Review Standards The Sardy House was built in 1890 and has been occupied as a residence, funeral home, restaurant, and lodge throughout that time; in 1985, the historic house underwent an extensive renovation and addition, including the addition of a boarding house building to the south of the now vacated alley. Through all these uses, the historic window sashes and doors have stood the test of time and in most cases, are the original historic material. In an effort to restore this landmark residence to its past glory, the applicant would like approval from the Historic Preservation Commission for the following: 1. Replacement of the non -historic glass in historic windows and doors with thermal glass while maintaining the historic frames and sashes 2. Replacement of non -historic glue -chip with custom thermal stained-glass, thermal clear glass, or exterior storm window while maintaining historic frames and sashes 3. Installation of exterior storm window over historic stained-glass 4. Reconfiguration of historic window that does not meet building code standards for egress 5. Reconfiguration windows and doors in the non -historic connecting element to eliminate divided-lites and reconfiguration of windows on the alley side of the 1985 addition. 1. Replacement of Non -Historic Glass in Historic, Window Sashes Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. (BMA) conducted an extensive review of all the windows doors in the historic residence and have found there are four (4) types of windows and two (2) types of doors in the historic residence; three (3) of the window types and one (1) of the door types appear to be historic. The complete report can be found in Exhibit 8: Window Sash Types and Door Construction. Element Architectural Glass conducted a review of the glass in all the windows and doors throughout the historic residence, and with the exception of a couple windows that need further review, found that there is no historic glass on the property. The detailed report can be found in Exhibit 9: Glass Inspection by Element Architectural Glass. The existing glass is single -pane throughout the residence and does not provide much in way of sound insulation or energy conservation. The property's location on Main Street, directly across from Paepcke Park and the bus stop, means that there is a lot of vehicle noise which is not buffered by the single -pane windows. The single -pane glass does not provide insulation from outside elements and does not meet the current energy code standards of the City of Aspen. The applicant proposes routing out of the existing sashes from the interior to allow for the installation of either 1/2" or 3/4" thermal insulated glass. The details of the process are described in Exhibit 10: Glass Replacement Process by RL Woodworks and Design. All windows and doors to be routed out for thermal glass are noted in Exhibit 7: Existing Plans and Elevations. They are denoted by an orange box around the window tag number. Review Criteria: Pa,-P19'f 6 City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, Section 3.1- Preserve the functional and decorative features of the window: Features important to the character of the window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operations, and groupings of windows o Compliance: ■ Frames and sashes will be maintained throughout the residence. • Frames and Sashes will appear unchanged from the exterior of the residence. All work is to be completed on the interior of the sashes to maintain the sash detail visible from the exterior • Dark Bronze spacers to be installed for thermal glass to minimize visual impact from the exterior ■ Sills and jambs will remain untouched ■ Moldings will remain untouched from the exterior; interior molding will be reduced slightly to accommodate the router required for the thermal glass ■ Operations and groupings of windows will be unchanged The Security of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guide for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings recommends retrofitting historic windows with high- performance glazing only if the historic character can be maintained. o Compliance: The process proposed by RL Woodworks, to router out the interior part of the sash to accept the energy -efficient glass will maintain the historic character of the windows 2. Replacement of Non -Historic Glue -Chip Glass Element Architectural Glass provided an extensive review of the three windows that have glue - chip glass and makes the following recommendations for rehabilitation of the windows detailed below. Please refer to Exhibit 7: Existing Plans and Elevations for window locations. • Window CCC o Location: stairs leading to second level, overlooking pool patio o Glue chip: Undetermined Age, further investigation of exterior putty and glazing to determine age and historic value o Replacement: ■ If historic, storm window will be added to the exterior. The storm window will be match the sash design and material of the historic window. It will fit tightly into the window opening ■ If non -historic, will be replaced with custom stained-glass thermal window, design to reflect Queen Anne period • Window EEE o Location: second level, west bathroom, overlooking pool patio o Glue chip: Lower panel is non -historic glue chip; window is not original and does not have historic value o Replacement: Window to be routed out from the inside to install thermal glass; lower panel will be replaced with frosted thermal glass for privacy • Window XXX o Location: third level, front elevation of house o Glue Chip: Undetermined Age; further investigation of exterior putty and glazing to determine age and historic value o Replacement: ■ If historic, storm window will be added to the exterior. The storm window will be match the sash design and material of the historic window. It will fit tightly into the window opening ■ If non -historic, will be replaced with custom stained-glass thermal window, design to reflect Queen Anne period Based on research of the Queen Anne Period, see Exhibit 11: Queen Anne Period Review, it was typical of houses like the Sardy House to have stained glass windows in prominent facades and as accents above entry doors and feature windows. The applicant would like to maintain the historic context of the stained-glass windows and proposes matching the historic arched stained-glass window located on the main level of the residence Pa,-P20'f 6 facing Main Street. The windows will be custom stained-glass designed to reflect the Queen Anne Period while maintaining the energy code requirements of the City of Aspen. Review Criteria: • City of Aspen Historic Preservation Guidelines Section 3.8-Energy Conservation: if a storm window is to be installed on the exterior, match the sash design and material of the original window. It should fit tightly within the window opening without the need for sub - frames or panning around perimeter. o Compliance: Where proposed above, exterior storm windows will match design and materials of the historic window and will be tightly fit into the window opening without the need for sub -frames • The Security of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guide for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings recommends retrofitting historic windows with high- performance glazing only if the historic character can be maintained. o Compliance: Where glass is to be replaced, the process proposed by RL Woodworks, to router out the interior part of the sash to accept the energy - efficient glass will maintain the historic character of the windows 3. External Thermopane for Historic Stained and Leaded Glass Window During the window review, Element Architectural Glass determined that the stained-glass window located (Window V1) on the front fagade of the residence is original to the house and has historic stained and leaded glass. The applicant would like to restore and protect this window to maintain its historic significance in perpetuity by installing an external thermopane. The thermopane will be designed to match the existing sash design and materials and will fit tightly into the window opening as outlined in Section 3.8 of the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Because the fagade of the Sardy house is setback from the side walk on Main Street, the exterior viewing distance of this window is 25.1 feet and the window is obscured by a vine and other landscaping for the majority of the year, the addition of an exterior storm window will not impact the character of the historic window as viewed from the public way. The addition of the external thermopane will also offer an increased level of protection from the outside elements and increased thermal barrier. Review Criteria: • City of Aspen Historic Preservation Guidelines Section 3.8-Energy Conservation: If a storm window is to be installed on the exterior, match the sash design and material of the original window. It should fit tightly within the window opening without the need for sub - frames or panning around perimeter. o Compliance: Where proposed above, external thermopane will match the design and materials of the historic window and will be. tightly fit into the window opening without the need for sub -frames 4. Reconfiguration of Window to Meet Life Safety Egress Requirements Window DDD, the required egress window for the upper level, west side bedroom, does not comply with the minimum net clear opening requirements to meet the Building Code standards for egress. The applicant would like to re -configure this window to meet the egress requirements while maintaining the historic nature of the window. The existing historic windows, when fully open, provides an opening of 18 inches in height by 52 inches in width. The dimensional requirements in Section 1030.2.1 of the 2015 International Building Code require a minimum net clear opening of 24 inches in height by 20 inches in width for all required egress openings. Element Architectural Glass reviewed the window and found that it is not original to the building and has no historic value, see Exhibit 9: Glass Inspection by Element Architectural Glass. The applicant proposes re -building the window using the existing sash and frame and routing for the installation of thermal glass comply with the dimensional requirements of the building code for egress and energy compliance. See Window DDD shown on Sheets A2.02 and A3.03 in Exhibit 7: Plans and Elevations Pa.-P21'f 6 W.A. 0 Review Criteria • The Security of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guide for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings recommends retrofitting historic windows with high- performance glazing only if the historic character can be maintained. o Compliance: Where glass is to be replaced, the process proposed by RL Woodworks, to router out the interior part of the sash to accept the energy - efficient glass will maintain the historic character of the windows • International Building Code, Emergency Escape and Rescue, Section 1030.2.1 Minimum Dimensions: The minimum net clear opening height shall be 24". The minimum net clear opening width dimension shall be 20" inches. The net clear opening dimensions shall be the result of normal operation of the opening. o Compliance: Reconfigure existing window to comply with IBC requirements for life safety as noted above 5. Reconfiguration of Non -Historic Windows The 1985 renovation and addition to the historic residence included a connection element on the west side between the residential kitchen and the historic structure and an addition to the east side to the back of the historic structure. As these areas are not historic, the applicant would like to reconfigure the windows to meet the needs of the current owner and to be more aesthetically pleasing. These areas are noted by red boxes in Exhibit 7: Plans and Elevations. (a) The 1985 addition to the east side of the building located along the now vacated alley, included a door and arched window configuration. The applicant would like to eliminate the door and reconfigure the window openings to mirror those located on the south side of the same addition. The window reconfiguration will create more continuity throughout the addition as the door is no longer required for access. 1. The proposed new window frame profiles would match those on the south side of the addition with glazing to comply with the 2015 International Energy Code. 2. Please see Page 1 of Exhibit 12: Reconfiguration at Alley and Connecting Element Existing and Proposed (b) The applicant would like to revise the layouts of the windows in the connecting element to remove the divided-lite windows and create a cleaner aesthetic. 1. The existing non -historic windows would be replaced with new windows same locations; frame profiles will match the windows in the 1985 addition, all glazing to comply with the 2015 International Energy Code 2. Please see Page 2 of Exhibit 12: Reconfiguration at Alley and Connecting Element Existing and Proposed Conclusion The enclosed materials and narrative provide the complete package for the City of Aspen to process the request for an Historic Preservation Commission Minor Review. Please let me know if there is anything additional I may provide for you. Sincerely, Jamie L. Brewster McLeod, AIA President Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. Pa'- pii)f 6 •. MEMORANDUM Date: August 29, 2017 To: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RECEIVED City of Aspen 130 S Galena Street AUG 3 1 2017 Aspen, CO 81611 Project: 128 E. Main Street CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DMOPMENT Re: Minor HPC Review From: Jamie L. Brewster McLeod Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. Attachments: • Exhibit 1: Ownership and Encumbrance Report • Exhibit 2: Authorization Letter for Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 3: Pre -Application Summary • Exhibit 4: Land Use Application • Exhibit 5: Fee Agreement • Exhibit 6: HOA Compliance Form • Exhibit 7: Plans and Elevations by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 8: Window Sash Types and Door Construction by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 9: Glass Inspection by Element Architectural Glass • Exhibit 10: Glass Replacement Process by RL Woodworks and Design • Exhibit 11: Queen Anne Period Review by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 12: Reconfiguration at Alley and Connecting Element Existing and Proposed by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Exhibit 13: Site Vicinity Map Ms. Simon — This is an application for a Minor HPC Review for Sardy House, located at 128 E. Main Street. We are requesting HPC review for the following: 1. Replacement of the non -historic glass in historic windows and doors with thermal glass while maintaining the historic frames and sashes 2. Replacement of non -historic glue -chip with custom thermal stained-glass, thermal clear glass, or exterior storm window while maintaining historic frames and sashes 3. Installation of exterior storm window over historic stained-glass 4. Reconfiguration of historic window that does not meet building code standards for egress 5. Reconfiguration windows and doors in the non -historic connecting element to eliminate divided-lites and reconfiguration of windows on the alley side of the 1985 addition. BREWSTER MCLEOD ARCHITECTS, INC. office(ftrewstermcleod.com — www.brewstermdeod.com 112 South Mill Street, #B Top Floor — P.O. Box 697 — Aspen, CO 81611 — T 970/544.0130 — F 970/544.9201 126 South Oak Street, Unit A — Telluride, CO 81435 — T 970/728.4300 — F 970/544.9201 The Sardy House is located at 128 East Main Street (see Exhibit 13: Site Vicinity Map). The property's Pitkin County Parcel IN is 2735-124-38-005. The property is zoned MU (Mixed Use) with an H (Historic Overlay). The H (Historic Overlay) is in recognition of the fact that (a) this property is within the Main Street Historic District, and (b) the Sardy House is an individually -designated Historic Landmark. Designation of the site and structure as an Historic Landmark was accomplished pursuant to Ordinance 4, Series of 1985. The Sardy House is owned by BTRSARDY LLC, A California Limited Liability Company (hereinafter, "the applicant"). Proof of the ownership of the property, together with the property's legal description, is provided in the attached Ownership and Encumbrance Report (see Exhibit 1). Authorization for Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. to submit this application on behalf of the applicant is provided in the letter attached as Exhibit 2. You provided us a Pre -Application Conference Summary (see Exhibit 3) which states that the applicant should address the following provisions of the Land Use Code: Common Development Review Procedures pursuant to Section 26.304 Minor Development pursuant to Section 26.415.070.0 The applicant's responses to the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code follow below: Common Development Review Procedures, Section 26.304 26.304.020 Pre -Application Conference Conference was completed on June 28, 2017; Pre -application Summary is included in this application as Exhibit 3. 26.304.030 Application and Fees Pre -Application Summary (Exhibit 3) outlines application requirements, deposit fee required, and number of copies required for application submittal: • Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement —See Exhibits 4 and 5 • Pre -Application Conference Summery —See Exhibit 3 • Street Address and Legal Description included in the Ownership and Encumbrance Report —See Exhibit 1 • Authorization Letter to act on behalf of the applicant —See Exhibit 2 • A site improvement survey —this requirement is waived given scope of project • HOA Compliance Form —See Exhibit 6 • Written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant approvals associated with the property: o Written Description of Proposal: see "Project Proposal and Demonstration of Compliance with Review Standards" pages 4-7 of this document o Exhibit 7: Plans and Elevations, prepared by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc., indicating all glass to be replaced and all areas to be reconfigured o Exhibit 8: Window Sash Types and Door Construction, prepared by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. o Exhibit 9: Glass Inspection by Element Architectural Glass o Exhibit 10: Glass Replacement Process by RL Woodworks and Design o Exhibit 11: Queen Anne Period Review, prepared by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. o Exhibit 12: Reconfiguration at Alley and Connecting Element Existing and Proposed by Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. • Written response to all review criteria —See "Project Proposal and Demonstration of Compliance with Review Standards" pages 4-7 of this document • An 8-1/2" x11" Vicinity Map locating the parcel with in the City of Aspen —See Exhibit 13 Minor Development, Section 26.415.070.0 Page 2 of 6 • Section 26.415.070.C(1) Review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for minor development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development Director that the proposed project constitutes minor development. Proposed development, described in the introduction, was determined to be "Minor Development" work during the Pre -Application Conference on June 28, 2017. Section 26.415.070.C(2)—Application Requirements All application requirements are addressed in the Pre -Application Summary. See list above detailing all exhibits provided in this application to demonstrate compliance with the review criteria. Scope of work is exempt from Residential Design Standard review as all elements of the historic residence will be replaced in existing locations with no changes to shape or size. Project Proposal and Demonstration of Compliance with Review Standards The Sardy House was built in 1890 and has been occupied as a residence, funeral home, restaurant, and lodge throughout that time; in 1985, the historic house underwent an extensive renovation and addition, including the addition of a boarding house building to the south of the now vacated alley. Through all these uses, the historic window sashes and doors have stood the test of time and in most cases, are the original historic material. In an effort to restore this landmark residence to its past glory, the applicant would like approval from the Historic Preservation Commission for the following: 1. Replacement of the non -historic glass in historic windows and doors with thermal glass while maintaining the historic frames and sashes 2. Replacement of non -historic glue -chip with custom thermal stained-glass, thermal clear glass, or exterior storm window while maintaining historic frames and sashes 3. Installation of exterior storm window over historic stained-glass 4. Reconfiguration of historic window that does not meet building code standards for egress 5. Reconfiguration windows and doors in the non -historic connecting element to eliminate divided-lites and reconfiguration of windows on the alley side of the 1985 addition. 1. Replacement of Non -Historic Glass in Historic Window Sashes Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. (BMA) conducted an extensive review of all the windows doors in the historic residence and have found there are four (4) types of windows and two (2) types of doors in the historic residence; three (3) of the window types and one (1) of the door types appear to be historic. The complete report can be found in Exhibit 8: Window Sash Types and Door Construction. Element Architectural Glass conducted a review of the glass in all the windows and doors throughout the historic residence, and with the exception of a couple windows that need further review, found that there is no historic glass on the property. The detailed report can be found in Exhibit 9: Glass Inspection by Element Architectural Glass. The existing glass is single -pane throughout the residence and does not provide much in way of sound insulation or energy conservation. The property's location on Main Street, directly across from Paepcke Park and the bus stop, means that there is a lot of vehicle noise which is not buffered by the single -pane windows. The single -pane glass does not provide insulation from outside elements and does not meet the current energy code standards of the City of Aspen. The applicant proposes routing out of the existing sashes from the interior to allow for the installation of either 1 /2" or 3/4" thermal insulated glass. The details of the process are described in Exhibit 10: Glass Replacement Process by RL Woodworks and Design. All windows and doors to be routed out for thermal glass are noted in Exhibit 7: Existing Plans and Elevations. They are denoted by an orange box around the window tag number. Review Criteria: Page 3 of 6 City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, Section 3.1- Preserve the functional and decorative features of the window: Features important to the character of the window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operations, and groupings of windows o Compliance: ■ Frames and sashes will be maintained throughout the residence. • Frames and Sashes will appear unchanged from the exterior of the residence. All work is to be completed on the interior of the sashes to maintain the sash detail visible from the exterior • Dark Bronze spacers to be installed for thermal glass to minimize visual impact from the exterior ■ Sills and jambs will remain untouched ■ Moldings will remain untouched from the exterior; interior molding will be reduced slightly to accommodate the router required for the thermal glass ■ Operations and groupings of windows will be unchanged The Security of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guide for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings recommends retrofitting historic windows with high- performance glazing only if the historic character can be maintained. o Compliance: The process proposed by RL Woodworks, to router out the interior part of the sash to accept the energy -efficient glass will maintain the historic character of the windows 2. Replacement of Non -Historic Glue -Chip Glass Element Architectural Glass provided an extensive review of the three windows that have glue - chip glass and makes the following recommendations for rehabilitation of the windows detailed below. Please refer to Exhibit 7: Existing Plans and Elevations for window locations. • Window CCC o Location: stairs leading to second level, overlooking pool patio o Glue chip: Undetermined Age, further investigation of exterior putty and glazing to determine age and historic value o Replacement: ■ If historic, storm window will be added to the exterior. The storm window will be match the sash design and material of the historic window. It will fit tightly into the window opening ■ If non -historic, will be replaced with custom stained-glass thermal window, design to reflect Queen Anne period • Window EEE o Location: second level, west bathroom, overlooking pool patio o Glue chip: Lower panel is non -historic glue chip; window is not original and does not have historic value o Replacement: Window to be routed out from the inside to install thermal glass; lower panel will be replaced with frosted thermal glass for privacy • Window XXX o Location: third level, front elevation of house o Glue Chip: Undetermined Age; further investigation of exterior putty and glazing to determine age and historic value o Replacement: ■ If historic, storm window will be added to the exterior. The storm window will be match the sash design and material of the historic window. It will fit tightly into the window opening ■ If non -historic, will be replaced with custom stained-glass thermal window, design to reflect Queen Anne period Based on research of the Queen Anne Period, see Exhibit 11: Queen Anne Period Review, it was typical of houses like the Sardy House to have stained glass windows in prominent facades and as accents above entry doors and feature windows. The applicant would like to maintain the historic context of the stained-glass windows and proposes matching the historic arched stained-glass window located on the main level of the residence Page 4 of 6 facing Main Street. The windows will be custom stained-glass designed to reflect the Queen Anne Period while maintaining the energy code requirements of the City of Aspen. Review Criteria: • City of Aspen Historic Preservation Guidelines Section 3.8-Energy Conservation: If a storm window is to be installed on the exterior, match the sash design and material of the original window. It should fit tightly within the window opening without the need for sub - frames or panning around perimeter. o Compliance: Where proposed above, exterior storm windows will match design and materials of the historic window and will be tightly fit into the window opening without the need for sub -frames • The Security of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guide for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings recommends retrofitting historic windows with high- performance glazing only if the historic character can be maintained. o Compliance: Where glass is to be replaced, the process proposed by RL Woodworks, to router out the interior part of the sash to accept the energy - efficient glass will maintain the historic character of the windows 3. External Thermopane for Historic Stained and Leaded Glass Window During the window review, Element Architectural Glass determined that the stained-glass window located (Window V1) on the front fagade of the residence is original to the house and has historic stained and leaded glass. The applicant would like to restore and protect this window to maintain its historic significance in perpetuity by installing an external thermopane. The thermopane will be designed to match the existing sash design and materials and will fit tightly into the window opening as outlined in Section 3.8 of the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Because the fagade of the Sardy house is setback from the side walk on Main Street, the exterior viewing distance of this window is 25.1 feet and the window is obscured by a vine and other landscaping for the majority of the year, the addition of an exterior storm window will not impact the character of the historic window as viewed from the public way. The addition of the external thermopane will also offer an increased level of protection from the outside elements and increased thermal barrier. Review Criteria: • City of Aspen Historic Preservation Guidelines Section 3.8-Energy Conservation: If a storm window is to be installed on the exterior, match the sash design and material of the original window. It should fit tightly within the window opening without the need for sub - frames or panning around perimeter. o Compliance: Where proposed above, external thermopane will match the design and materials of the historic window and will be tightly fit into the window opening without the need for sub -frames 4. Reconfiguration of Window to Meet Life Safety Egress Requirements Window DDD, the required egress window for the upper level, west side bedroom, does not comply with the minimum net clear opening requirements to meet the Building Code standards for egress. The applicant would like to re -configure this window to meet the egress requirements while maintaining the historic nature of the window. The existing historic windows, when fully open, provides an opening of 18 inches in height by 52 inches in width. The dimensional requirements in Section 1030.2.1 of the 2015 International Building Code require a minimum net clear opening of 24 inches in height by 20 inches in width for all required egress openings. Element Architectural Glass reviewed the window and found that it is not original to the building and has no historic value, see Exhibit 9: Glass Inspection by Element Architectural Glass. The applicant proposes re -building the window using the existing sash and frame and routing for the installation of thermal glass comply with the dimensional requirements of the building code for egress and energy compliance. See Window DDD shown on Sheets A2.02 and A3.03 in Exhibit 7: Plans and Elevations Page 5 of 6 Review Criteria • The Security of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation and Illustrated Guide for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings recommends retrofitting historic windows with high- performance glazing only if the historic character can be maintained. o Compliance: Where glass is to be replaced, the process proposed by RL Woodworks, to router out the interior part of the sash to accept the energy - efficient glass will maintain the historic character of the windows • International Building Code, Emergency Escape and Rescue, Section 1030.2.1 Minimum Dimensions: The minimum net clear opening height shall be 24". The minimum net clear opening width dimension shall be 20" inches. The net clear opening dimensions shall be the result of normal operation of the opening. o Compliance: Reconfigure existing window to comply with IBC requirements for life safety as noted above 5. Reconfiguration of Non -Historic Windows The 1985 renovation and addition to the historic residence included a connection element on the west side between the residential kitchen and the historic structure and an addition to the east side to the back of the historic structure. As these areas are not historic, the applicant would like to reconfigure the windows to meet the needs of the current owner and to be more aesthetically pleasing. These areas are noted by red boxes in Exhibit 7: Plans and Elevations. (a) The 1985 addition to the east side of the building located along the now vacated alley, included a door and arched window configuration. The applicant would like to eliminate the door and reconfigure the window openings to mirror those located on the south side of the same addition. The window reconfiguration will create more continuity throughout the addition as the door is no longer required for access. 1. The proposed new window frame profiles would match those on the south side of the addition with glazing to comply with the 2015 International Energy Code. 2. Please see Page 1 of Exhibit 12: Reconfiguration at Alley and Connecting Element Existing and Proposed (b) The applicant would like to revise the layouts of the windows in the connecting element to remove the divided-lite windows and create a cleaner aesthetic. 1. The existing non -historic windows would be replaced with new windows same locations; frame profiles will match the windows in the 1985 addition, all glazing to comply with the 2015 International Energy Code 2. Please see Page 2 of Exhibit 12: Reconfiguration at Alley and Connecting Element Existing and Proposed Conclusion The enclosed materials and narrative provide the complete package for the City of Aspen to process the request for an Historic Preservation Commission Minor Review. Please let me know if there is anything additional I may provide for you. Sincerely, Jamie L. Brewster McLeod, AIA President Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. Page 6 of 6 PREVENT FRAUD - Please remember to call a member of our closing team when initiating a wire transfer or providing wiring instr"M E' VED Customer Distribution Property Address: 128 E MAIN ST, ASPEN, CO 81611 For Closing Assistance Kimberly Parham 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-1678(phone) 303-393-4870 (fax) kparham@ltgc.com Company License: C044565 Contact License: C0414945 Closer's Assistant NIKKI DURRETT 533 E HOPKINS #102 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-1678 (phone) 800-318-8202 (fax) ndurrett@kgc.com AUG 31 2017 CamF ASPEN MNT Our Order Number: ABC62008665 Date: 08-24-2017 For Title Assistance SCOTT BENNETTS 5975 GREENWOOD PLAZA BLVD GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 303-850-4175 (phone) 303-393-4842 (fax) sbennetts@ltgc.com PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS Seller/Owner BTRSARDY LLC, ACALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Delivered via: Delivered by Attorney Agent for Seller GARFIELD & HECHT PC Attention: CHRIS LACROIX 625 E HYMAN AVE #201 ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-1936 (work) 970-925-3008 (work fax) clacroix@garfieldhecht.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Agent for Seller GARFIELD & HECHT PC Attention: SASHA SEMPLE 625 E HYMAN AVE #201 ASPEN, CO 816" 970-925-1936 (work) 970-925-3008 (work fax) ssemple@garfieldhecht.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Land 1I4IG aaaa�e aoMr�ror --•SiXa rg63--- Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Order Number: ABC62008665 Date: 08-24-2017 Property Address: 128 E MAIN ST, ASPEN, CO 81611 Buyer/Borrower: A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED Seller: BTRSARDY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Visit Land Title's website at www.ltac.com for directions to any of our offices. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number: ABC62008665 Customer Ref -Loan No.: Property Address: 128 E MAIN ST, ASPEN, CO 81611 1. Effective Date: 08-17-2017 At 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment $0.00 Proposed Insured: A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: BTRSARDY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOTS F,G,H, AND I LESS THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET THEREOF, AND ALL OF LOTS P,Q,R, AND S AND THAT PART OF THE VACATED ALLEY BOUNDED BY THE EXTENSION OF THE EASTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS I AND S AND THE WESTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS F AND P, ALL IN BLOCK 66, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO Copyright 2006-2017 American Land TYtle Association. All Rights Reserved �"RRWAN LAND TITL! ASWMTN The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-1 (Requirements) Order Number: ABC62008665 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to -wit: THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OR EXCEPTIONS MAY BE NECESSARY WHEN THE BUYERS NAMES ARE ADDED TO THIS COMMITMENT. COVERAGES AND/OR CHARGES REFLECTED HEREIN, IF ANY, ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON RECEIPT OF THE CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO. 1. WARRANTY DEED FROM BTRSARDY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Order Number: ABC62008665 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES. 9. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE DEED FROM THE CITY OF ASPEN RECORDED FEBRUARY 03, 1888 IN BOOK 59 AT PAGE M AND RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1887 IN BOOK 59 AT PAGE 2 PROVIDING AS FOLLOWS: THAT NO TITLE SHALL BE HEREBY ACQUIRED TO ANY MINE OF GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR OR COPPER OR TO ANY VALID MINING CLAIM OR POSSESSION HELD UNDER EXISTING LAWS. 10. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINACE NO. 2 (SERIES 1961) VACATING ALLEY AND UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED MAY 01, 1961 IN BOOK 194 AT PAGE 7. 11. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DEED RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1961 IN BOOK 193 AT PAGE 22. 12. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 60 (SERIES 1976) RECORDED DECEMBER 09, 1976 IN BOOK 321 AT PAGE a. 13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF NOTICE OF APPROVAL RECORDED JULY 18, 2017 AT RECEPTION NO. 639981. 14. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY CERTIFIED APRIL 07, 2016 PREPARED BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING-LLC, JOB #16069: Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Order Number: ABC62008665 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: FENCE LINES ARE NOT COINCIDENT WITH PROPERTY LINES. SAID DOCUMENT STORED AS OUR ESI 27002100 ��+y pqq JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY L� !V TWO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF SUMMIT COUNTY t"*Akm LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND —_ ViW,t 9967— OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company and Meridian Land Title, LLC, as agents for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: ► applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web -based transaction management system; ► your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; ► a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and ► the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non -affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: ► We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. ► We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. ► Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. ► We regularly access security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. P" LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY L" f !de Simce t aw►�9,DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS --..47 -- Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: A) The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property) C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B-2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third parry holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction. * * Commitment to Insure * ALTA Commitment - 2006 Rev. * * OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, (Company) for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed * Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, * upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A * * and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage", when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at www.alta.org. STANDARD EXCEPTIONS In addition to the matters contained in the Conditions and Stipulations and Exclusions from Coverage above referred to, this Commitment is also subject to the following: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the Public Records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Land would disclose and which are not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 oft 1. Frew, ar Freddut Old Republic National Title Insurance Company a Stock Company 400 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612)371-I r US& �Y pyewe t R�n6� YwNr �ry AMERICA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION ik J'HIBIT 2: uthorization Letter Ms. Jessica Garrow, Director Ms. Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FOR 128 EAST MAIN STREET Dear Ms. Garrow and Ms. Simon, REC""'VED AUG ° 2017 CITi -,�;� - BEN CITY OF ASPEN COM DEV AUG 3 12017 WELLS FARGO.BANK 6100210277 We are the owners of the Sardy House, located 128 East Main Street. We hereby authorize Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. to submit applications for a Certificate of No Negative Effect and a Minor HPC Review for the property. Ms. Brewster McLeod is authorized to submit the land use applications on our behalf and to represent us in meetings with the staff and the applicable decision -making bodies. Should you have any need to contact me during the course of your review of this application please do so through Brewster McLeod Architects, Inc. Sincerel1*4--- BTRSARDY, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company Craig Payne 128 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 HIBIT 3: CITY OF ASPEN re -Application Summary PRE -APPLICATION SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, 429-2758 DARWEIVED PROJECT: 128 E. Main, Minor HPC Review AUG 3 12017 REPRESENTATIVE: Brewster McLeod Architects CITY OF ASPEN DESCRIPTION: 128 E. Main Street is a historic property located in the MaiQp "Wj DW District. The property owner is undertaking renovation work throughout the existing structure. Some actions require approval by the Historic Preservation Commission before proceeding, namely energy and safety upgrades to a number of historic windows, and replacement of several non - historic windows. HPC must conduct Minor Development review and will consider whether the relevant review criteria in Section 26.415 of the Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines are met for the work to proceed. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.0 Minor Development Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Develor)ment/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Application: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apes%20and%20Fees/2011 %20 H istoric%20 Land%20Use%20App%20Form.pdf Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: http://www. aspenpitki n.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/H PC/New%20H istoric%2OPreservation%20G uidelines.pdf Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines: https:Happ.box.com/s/3aOvvpgpwtdzsomb9aa9rjsfg3gx2o1 b Review by: Staff for complete application and recommendation, HPC for decision Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC (posting of notice only) Planning Fees: $1,300 for up to 4 billable hours. Lesser/additional hours will be refunded or billed at a rate of $325 per hour. Referral Fees: None Total Deposit: $1,300 To apply, submit 1 copy -of -the following information: ❑ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. 0 'Pr-japplication Conference Summary (this document). 11" ree add 's� and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (not older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ A site improvement survey (not older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. (This requirement will be waived given the scope of the project.) ❑ HOA Compliance form (Attached) ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. ❑ Written responses to all review criteria. ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Once the application is determined to be complete, submit: ❑ A digital copy of the application emailed to amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. Please provide text and graphics as separate files. ❑ 12 copies of the project graphics. ❑ Total deposit for review of the application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 Historic Preservation Land Use EXHIBIT 4: HPC Land Use Application ATTACHMENT 2 - Histork Preservation Land Use Application Pailm T. Name: 128 E. Main, Minor UPC Review CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Block: 66 Lot: P AND Lot: S4 S 25' of Lots FtI - (indicate street address, lot At block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED)2735-124-38-005 Appficaet: LLC Address: 128 E gain Street Aspen CO 01611 Phone#: 270-379-1907 Fax#: E-mail: RIMIAFNTATrvei I Name: Address: PbMW#: t70-544-0130 Fax#a70-544-9201 E-"I:iamieebrewstexvacleod.com T vn of ArrucAmm (lease deck all diet eeelA ❑ Historic Designation 0 Certificate of No Negative Effect 0 Certificate of Appropriateness no -Minor Historic Develo ►t 0-Ms4jar Historic Development ❑ -Conceptual Historic Develcipm nt ❑ -Final Historic Development 0-subaarRial A,merArrent ❑ Relocation (temporary, on 0 or off -site) 0 Demolition (WW demolition) 0 Historic LoWnradc Lot split FAIRR �Y OF AtSPEN CO f 3 PROFOsAu (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) C PEV See attached ..:r_ q l 7V K WEu'S p�102� g10 Cjly of Aspen} ts4 . raalena '5treet�} (974) �Q 5b90 Nlstorlc l arrd Use Applka#ion Requirements, ilpdatsd: March 24X AsdN Historic Preservation Land Use RETAtN FOR POMANEN"r RECORD EXHIBIT 5: Agreement to Pay Application Fees Agreement to Pay - A-k F An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and o0 !�V I `-, Property Phone No.:970-379-1907 Owner ("I"): BTRSardy LLC Ernail: sardyhouse@gmail.gom Address of 3iking Property:128 East Main Street Address: 128 E Main Street AUG d g Z017 (Subject of (send bkls here pen, CO 81611 application) CCTV nr *tie I understand that the City has adopted, via ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for land Use appkcatkxns and payment of these fees Is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat lee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it Is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved In processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit an sy accrue. 1 understand and agree that it is Impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient Information to enable Willy required findings to be Prf made for project consideration, unless k wokes are Paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that Invoices malled by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shag be considered by the Cky as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Pokey including coraieelwences for no -payment. I agree to pay the following Initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not realer and application complete or compkant with approval criteria. if actual recorded costs exceed tM initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $1, 300. 00 deposit for 4 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $323.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount wile be billed at $323.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property owner: Jessica Garrow, AICP Community Development Director Name: Craig Payne for BTRSardy LLC City Use: Tkle: Fees Due: $_Received $ Authorized Agent XHIBIT 6: OA Compliance Pol Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. Subject Property: _128 E Main Street. Ashen rn 81611 I, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) R� feWE'D p g12017 ca 11 This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: Attorney printed name: date:', ,C P),,,, Craig Payne date: "�ECEI� '!t > 9 f4' SEP072017 Cl) r OF ASPEN %�f� C"'^WW1Y DDELOPMENT GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 1 in • 50 FL, NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE 71v,' TFF. YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF: SARDY HOUSE PROPERTY Plans and Elevations A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED ON LOTS P, 0, R & S AND PORTIONS OF LOTS F, G, H, I, AND THE ALLEY OF BLOCK 66 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 2 CONTROL/TITLE DIAGRAM glwnD no.sREeAR lI� ®� W/DIASTKW I w/pUsm.s xtx.SP E.S. 79DJ0 JJl W/PWTC UP fOUxO C11Y R0QE0MlIR L5. flp• 1'�11lE w/KUKfMMtM 269.95' , WIT LOT 1 TN 15'ALUE� UMW PAGE 11 LS. 30111 Q, U.S. WEST SUBDIVISION PLAT PDWER$F1FV410N co. W.E'•,,� I BOOK 32 32 PAGE 11 gI OV� FOUND N0. 5 RLBAR �r{ ♦ Q' W/1 TIC W STAMPED WTTNE C01111x 1111 SA I 9s ___ PUT SUSON1510t1 PAGE II """CO" Su ��JP GEC P REC140.597782 '9 MU AF U1D WORM ND. f0 1976 lF FRC1P NO 11 ICRDSS HAT-0 AREAS SUBJECT PROPERTY 128 MAIN ST. 17,444 SO, FT. 0.400 AC. +/ u N1v/788.fs I FOUND—KOCR CO K FOU.D XD. 5.(.R I 1'IRON PILE " "UP /I W/AIUMIXUM W � R1EGIflLF ROIFCl pf NCHMARr BUFS N])'S4Yi. I.T - I I COT OI-111-TROL MONUMINT G-1 pFTTRS a— OF GARMISCN A FgPRFNS IFOUNDW 5RERAR W/ALUMINUM CAP KW { ILLEGIBLE AREA Ui SULELT PRUPFRIT WMFRE 44 IwDF�MINFO IUU nUx FOR POWERi SEEASEMEHt 0[IVE4ITING N10U NST II AIES Ll PNOIEIFGRAPH b IOCMEI ,1CYRP.NO, 11 1 10691IEt IIFL NG. pO0R 193 PAGE E91 —ND NO. SUE i W/ALUMINUM W V WITMESSCORNER L5. 11580 I I UTFU EASEMEHE /ED F THE CEP' OF ATPEN ATEO NTIF EYCF PAGE GE 71 ID D. 3113091b00R 39R JI ,C w - SITE J3 o � V VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1' • 2000' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PER TITLE COMMITMENT) LOTS F,G,H, AND I LESS THE NORTHERLY 7S FEET THEREOF, AND ALL OF LOTS P,QR, AND 5 AND THAT PART OF THE VACATED ALLEY SOUNDED BY THE EJETENSION OF THE EASTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS I AND S AND THE WESTERLY LOT LINES OF LOTS F AND P, ALL IN BLOCK 66, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 1) DATE OF FIELD WORK: MARCH 29 - 31, APRIL 4 -5, AND NOVEMBER 21 - 22, 2016 2) DATE OF PREPARATION: MARCH -APRIL AND NOVEMBER, 2016. 3) BASIS OF BEARING: N38' 05' 44'W BETWEEN NGS STATION 0-159 AND NGS STATION S-159 PER THE CITY OF ASPEN GPS RGI CONTROL MONUMENTATION MAP PREPARED BY MAN ENGINEERING. WHICH ESTABLISHED A PROJECT SPECIFIC BEARING OF N 74-11.04- BETWEEN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 66, MONUMENTED BY A FOUND CITY OF ASPEN BLOCK CORNER (I- IRON PIPE WITH ALUMINUM CAP) AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 66, MONUMENTED BY A FOUND NO 5 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP (LS. 25947) 4) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY SEIPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC (SE) TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, SE RELIED UPON THE ITEMS LISTED WITHIN THE SOURCE DOCUMENT TABLE CONTAINED HEREON AND THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER NO. ABC62007374-7, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF APRIL 11. 2016. 5) NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATES WERE PERFORMED FOR THIS SURVEY, UTILITIES SHOWN ARE PER FIELD OBSERVED EVIDENCE 6) THE ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 128 MAIN STREET, ASPEN, C081611. PITKIN COUNTY PARCEL NO. 273512438005, 7) ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 0809700203C (TUNE 4, 1987) THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE NOT WITHIN A FLOOD ZONE B) THE 1998 ALTA/ACSM SURVEY REFERENCED IN THE SOURCE DOCUMENT TABLE BELOW SHOWS THE FIELD MEASURED BEARINGS AND DISTANCES BETWEEN FOUND MONUMENTS FOR THE LIMITS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY, THAT THESE MEASUREMENTS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE SOURCE DOCUMENT REFERENCED 1%9 OFFICIAL PLAT OF THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OFASPEN. THIS SURVEY LOCATED BLOCK CORNER MONUMENTS THAT VERIFIED THE 1959 RECORD DIMENSIONS OF THE LOTS AND ALLEYWAY THAT COMPRISE THE UMRS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 9) BASIS OF ELEVATION: THE 1999 CITY OF ASPEN CONTROL DATUM, WHICH IS BASED ON AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88' (NAVD 1988) ON THE NGS STATION "S159". THIS ESTABUSHED A SITE BENCHMARK ELEVATION OF 7897.9' ON A FOUND ALUMINUM CAPON A 1' IRON PIPE (UNSTAMPED) MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST BLOCK CORNER AND PROPERTY CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. SOURCE DOCUMENTS: PLAT -CITY B TOWNSITE OF ASPEN MAP -GE BUCHANAN MAP-DECEMBER 16, 1959 (RECEPTION NO. 102025) • MAP -CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION REVISED JULY 13, 2010 • PUT-U.S. WEST SUBDIVISION (PLAT BK. 32-PG.18) • PLAT -CONDOMINIUM MAP OF VICTORIANS AT SLEEKER (PLAT BK. 43 PG. 16) • SURVEY -IMPROVEMENT SURVEY, EASTERLY 20 FEET LOT M. LOT N AND LOT 0, BLOCK 66-ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. (SURVEY BK. 002-PG. 11) • PUT -ASPEN CLINIC BUILDING CONDOMINIUM (PUT SK. 6O-PG. 48) • SURVEY-ALTNACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY -POWERS ELEVATION CC INC, OCTOBER 23,1998(UNRECORDED, PROVIDED BY CUENT) ALL OF THE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO RECORDSUNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1, GEOFFREY R. KELLER, HEREBY CERTIFY TO BTRSARDY, LLC, A LIMITED CALIFORNIA LIABILITY, THAT THIS IS AN'IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS DEFINED BY C.R.S. 5 38-51-102(9), AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE CURRENT LOCATION OF ALL STRUCTURES, WATER COURSES. WATER FEATURES AND/OR BODIES OF WATER, FLOOD PLAIN. ROADS, TRAILS. VISIBLE UTILITIES. FENCES, HEDGES, OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND WITHIN FIVE FEET OF ALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL, ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, AND ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE NATURE THAT ARE VISIBLE, OR APPARFF[4�T..O�O3 EC�ORRD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DESCRIBED IN THE LETTER REFERENCED IN NOTE NO ABOVE. AS SPECIFIED ON TH�� SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC THE CLOSURE FOR THIS SUIT BLESS THAN 1/15.000 Imo CIVIL NSULTA - — — I 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 GIE►k 70) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM - - - - GRK 1606911/2612016 G:\2016\16169\SURVEY\SumeY DWGs\ALTA\16069 ALTA BASE.dwg NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM ME DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF: SARDY HOUSE PROPERTY A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED ON LOTS P, Q, R & S AND PORTIONS OF LOTS F, G, H, I, AND THE ALLEY OF BLOCK 66 CITY & TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO CMFFT 7 T]F 7 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 91623 70) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1) THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN PLOTTED BASED ON UTILITY MAPS. CONSTRUCTION/DESIGN PLANS, OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES AND ACTUAI. FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME INSTANCES. THESE UTILTIES, AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS- IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2) THE LOCATION OF THE SEWER LINE ISBASEDONA MAPPROVIDEDBYTHE ASPENSANTATION DISTRICT,DATED APRIL, 2016. 3) THE CITY OF ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE ANY WATER UNE WITHIN THE PROPERTY EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND O CATV PEDESTAL m TELEPHONE PEDESTAL O ELECTRIC METER/PEDESTAL [] ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER iS SEWERCLEANOUT m SEWER MANHOLE 0 GAS METER Q TELEPHONE MANHOLE ly GROUND RECESSED LIGHT W CURB STOP CHAINUNK FENCE —vv— WOODEN FENCE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE —w—u+— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC —r—r— WATERLINE GAS LINE —u—u— SEWER LINE --uc ---�c— UNDERGROUND CABLE —w —u�— UNDERGROUND UTILITY taZ 1� DECIDUOUS TREE(R TREES TRUNK DIA' X DRIPLINF) CONIFEROUS TREE(9 TREES TRUNK DIA.' X DRIPUNE-) • SHRUB (SCALED TO DRIPLINE DIAMETER) SPOT EL EVATION GRAPHIC SCALE 0 l ( IN FEET I �` tw (i 3F0 ° 3 Sn c: N37997 GRK 16069 11/26/2016 G'\2016`,1t069\Sl1RVEYIS—, D W GS\ALTA\16069 ALTA BASE.dwe • ----------- I I I I I I I I I I I ----------------------------- ---------------------------- I I I I I I I L� I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r- II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L r 1 I I I I I , I , I I I I I I I I I I I I � I i I I � I I -_ 1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING LEGEND LPC- IE VIEW HI9TORIG O� WR�GW BIMIA BRE-R WL-ARCIRTECTJ ASRER 1:3 Bou+n N $:,M. rB iw Floe r.O.b 697 - A.p.n.CO $1E11 r uros•A.o+ao - r 9rasuem+ 1H1uR✓DE r...Er. co nav r 9ro.ne.aoo 6161011 HFc 62W&l WC &A"" 116' - I'-V w.IBM / 18MR•+ PROJECT N TRUE FLOORPLAN LOWER LEVEL EXISTING A2.00 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION * • • I�BJ 1 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN LEGEND WPC- IPENEW NIBTORIC QIlBS WMDCW BMA BR —TER Wl—w.cRrtecrs .sR.n r r x swin er sn..i. re roPTdv P.O. en 07 - •pin, CO e+er 1 T BT0.9�flrJ0 - f e)e.5uA30t IHlle.�! tM bR� OW. W..c ur. Tr .w e�ais T na.Tze.uro Q� W� V) O O ® E Qw� �oc N :ltlon Hrc e�von arc k ]/16'- Ib" uaRro:R, PROJECT N TRUE FLOOR PLAN FIRST LEVEL EXISTING A2.01 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION • M ry Mv I SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING - LEGEND 1PG- RENEW M16TORIC Q1666 WROCW BMA BRE Wp IER 61c1E00 APCRRECIE AYpN t 1 3 5pnn N Si�..t..B iw EIWr P O. eo." - A7 CO p16t1 T p10.y40t)0 . I Co IMIVIrDE T.6.b. CO R1 E plo.728- w.y...r.d..aWw 6161on we 62uon ,rc &A""AL 3/16" -1'-0' . Jam PROJECT N TRUE FLOOR PLAN SECOND LEVEL EXISTING A2.02 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A • ;� �� ©l m o c o II A �i THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING 1 LEGEND B J M A B mEn hkuoo ARCMrtFCi3 1.1pG. REVIEW 113 Doom M* /0 i11161 IAStOItlC A P.o. ho. wx . Ap.o.co elan t Yxo.W o130 - r ora-1 ml- 1mea,mo s.-;.1 w 0 PM pN, DM 1dAa.. co.'a w.. i xw.;. 6282011 MM W WO! HPG &MMITTAL u1s•- ro• �Utl, 18M / JBM u-1 PROJECT N TRUEN FLOORPLAN THIRD LEVEL EXISTING A2.03 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LEGEM BMA 13-- Ma—ARcHtTEC73 TAX PWM EL. ow-w. w vr Tw F WATORC P.O.FwA­X. T V— F TBLIIIeLE Q WOM co A T 910J.— iij-, r-H Ml HOUM-TWIFRD TO. FNIN EL HT-W YIP Eli HOUSE NORTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED QR-T "O"-SECOND III TO. FKSW EL . 90-5- VIP 1101"-IE. IGIEOTI TO. PNl&4 EL - wl,-2 A vp WOUSE-FIRST TO. FNIM4 EL . W.-I. VIP - - 0 Mn FL - "01"-11E. I"ILLI EL - n0l-5* VIP WOL)SE-SECOND !GUEST) J. TO. FM8W EL - Wl'-2 L,2- vr- T10. W MNMW ousE-PMT HOUSEL ---------------------------------------------------- NORTH ELEVATION EXISTING ELEVATION NORTH HOUSE IA3.00 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION HOUSE -THIRD (REC) TO. FN1511 EL . I77'-0' VF HO N-SECQID EL . IOff-C' VIP • • • I,1LI 111111111 ax © I [I'C01111111111 O 1 HOUSE-LOUER (TECH) TD. CZNCRETE EL . W-n- VF HOUSE TOFN1-%4. SH - - - - EL • EAST ELEVATION I NO CHANGE rio � L 1�' I I I I I I 1 I I I L---------I I i I----___ - LEGEFD C,� HPC- REvIEIY FI eNlW= pmaWNDM HOUSE _ � TD. R1DGE EL • l34'-10-5A5' VF CARBAOE TD. ROOF EL • 130-3-3W VF THIRD TD. FHO14 �TD.WBH EL • in'-5' VF '29F 0 O CAFRIAM-mcckc To.FWM EL • IOl'-5' vF nil �L�1, CARRIAGE -FIRST (5TIII)10) iD. FNI5 ELQ 96 II V.. I I I I I I I I I I I I CAJII2IAGE-LOLLER L--———————————— io FNIN! EL • Si'-5' VF BMA B.E-l- thleoo A.CH- 1lz saxn w sr.w. ee rw rav T olo.w U10o - F 0)O.YY.9i0' TH111M0! 1MSWno 51rw1.1Me T— CO .1— 82WW WC SUBMRTAL L1P-r-0- w 1RM / JIiM ioo ELEVATION EAST A3.01 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C� HOUSE 2 SOUTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED m HOUSE -FIRST (DACX) TD FNISH EL . W'-,' vF HOUSE I SOUTH ELEVATION - EXISTING III I I � � 1111111111'l1',1'1 i l l l 1'1I i t \t,t \� w jll!lijilll�jtili �hftj j 0 ttttl \� , f': IIIIIIF��'�Illlall�\w��ll tt� �_ w Illilim; • EL LEGEND FI M M❑MMTORC 0 mee YRODW HOUSE-' TO. RIDGE EL . oe'-e• vF HOUSE -THIRD (REO) TD. FNISH EL . OY-II• VP HOUSE-BECDND _ � iO.FW6N EL 01'-e• VF HCUSE-SEOOHD (MASTER) TD. FNISN HOUSE -FIRST 6, TD. FINISH EL • IW'-O' VF T-- _ _ A TO. RIDGE EL . Oe'-10-ei/' VF HOUSE A TD. RIDIA EL • GS'-e" VF HOUSE -THIRD (REO) i0. FNISH _ EL • Itl'-II• VF HOUSE-SEOOIv Tlo FNISH EL . nr-9• vF HQ1SE-6EGO11ID (MASTER) TD. FNISH vr T�1�IRST VF IBM A BR—TFR NkL—"CHlT— —N - Np 8 1 611 T 9)O.—.0,90 . F Co—.54 I THLUNOF ,M Swm OY 90w,, uHI Te1xb. CO Al.. e1SIq, WC &aMITTAL �18M / 1BM ., IB ELEVATION SOUTH HOUSE A3.02 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 0 M. - no'-3-3Ab- vr C.M;MA6E-THIRD 'o F 75" EL. . 111.5' VF n n --------- CAFMA&E-5ECCkO /Ja TD. FNI&4 EL. VT p CAFMArE-FIRST (PMRY) TD.FNIS4 EL. - 55;-7 NP rl 0 (BPA) TtrX FIR5T M-. vp — — — — — — — — — - I L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - C.AMAGE-LOaR L TD. FNIS4 C.AMAGE ,J& TD. ROOF EL.. W'-3-3/*' vr- ------- - ---------- N/ III, C-AFM1AC.E-THIRD TO, FINISH V EL. - IM-5- VF CARRIAGE-MCCID TD FIN$&4 EL. - OT-5- VIP f�' v LEGEAD �!B M JA A— S!— se Tw �7,CO wND= m- - m'-Ir vr ,o"-T",W 5,DROCTI) TD. FNk'A4 IL - VIP TD FNI&4 Ir' EL - VF HOUSE -FIRST TD. FN16w EL.. cv-01 VF HOUSE -LOVER O'MCH) TE EL, . N -11' VP 10"-LOVER TD. F141&4 EL- VP 2 WEST ELEVATION -PROPOSED I�Z> 0 "ou T10. PJDc.H EL.. OV-10-5/8' 11F HOUSE -THIRD (FeG) TD.FNIM (BEDROOM TD. M04 'wrl EL.. rIS'-6@ VF HOUSE-BECOKI) 6 TD. M104 Y EL - W-8- VF HOUSE -FIRST �—ww-v' VF WO"-LOUER n'SCW TD. CoNcfa-E M--. SY-11- VF L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - I HOUSE -LOVER TD. MUM4 EL - M-6' VF 62wol we ReMMAL JBM JBM ELEVATION WEST A3.03 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 7 CARRIAGE -SPA �TD.FNFLOOR ------J EL-W-II'VFF I I I I I I I I CARRIAGE ELEVATION- EXEMNG.------------------ DIMMiH I I I I I I ----------------------------------JI ,� 11® L_ _ _- - - - LEGEt HPC- RENEW H18TORIC TO. 1985 eeNDQY EL. • b0'•f- • M CARRIAGE -THIRD TD. FN16H CARRIA5E-6EC ND TD, FN16H EL- . 10T'-5• NF O P CARRIAGE-FIRBi (ENiRT'1 TO. FN18H CARRIAGE FIRBT f8TUDIO1 TD. FNI6H EL.. II' VF CARRIAGE-LOUER TD. FN16H EL.. 86'-6^ VP CARRIAGE TD. RocF EL.. t30'-3-3K' VIP _. - -. CAMAC.E-THIN ._.___....__....__.. __ _ ... .. _ � TO. FNIBH EL. • In VIP CARRIAGE-yEcaFro EL.. I0l'-5' NF CARRIAGE NORTH ELEVATION - EXISTING 1 NO CHANGE I i I I �I��II--�I caoaAGE-FIRaTr6rA1 �_--------------- _ /�TD.FNIBH I I EL.. 66'-il• VF I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TD. FNl Cf-LQIER IL----------------------------------------------- �- _ TD.-06'- BIMIA BREY.eTEP hklfCO APCFIRECTi At 1 t9 Somn Af e9.m, eP Ta91'lov P.o. ee. wr • A.po co eten T OTO .Ot 30 - f 910.Sa.,9e01 iHLUP10[ tin ea,M 0.. $ewl. IN A Tame.. co et T 910.IIDAe00 62won HFC &R"TT& V16 1W �^JBM / JBM ELEVATION NORTH -SOUTH C.ARRI:IGE A3.04 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM Date: August 24, 2017 EXHIBIT 8: Project: Sardy House Window Sash Types and 128 E Main Street Door Construction Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Window Sash Types and Door Construction From: Teraissa A. McGovern Sardy House: Window Sash Types We classified four different types of window sashes used in the development of the Sardy House. The characteristics of each type indicate a specific timeline of building, thus determining each window's estimated period of construction. What is a window sash? S,d,n Shea h \ • A window sash is the part of the window that holds the glass Drip Cop — and the framework around the glass to keep it in place. E.l C--g; Inside cos n� Window sashes are fitted in to the window frame and may or sn,dSIop lmo may not be movable. P. sh S S'°p soy sbp Heod • They are very important to the overall construction and durability of the window. While mostly associated with double- pill.) � hung windows, sashes can be found on any window which moves. The Sardy House has a variety of types. Mw,,g Raab JCheh RaBl 5•A• • While we do not know the exact year when each type of D-bl. Gi-mi; window in the Sardy House was built, we can place each type S"F SIP S�II � Jom.b along a timeline based on the progression of woodworking S,00, technology. Ro.l Sub SA Apo, • The four (4) types on the next page are each categorized as Sid.n Type I, II, III and IV, with Type I being the oldest and Type IV Sh-ftrsR ,M„deWoll the newest. Terms • Joinery: The method by which two or more pieces of wood are connected. Joinery can involve simple gluing, nailing or screwing of the two pieces of wood but it can be as complicated as using very intricate joints. • Radius: Smoothness of the sash's curve, material used, operation of movement. • Stile: Vertical part of sash • Rail: horizontal part of sash • Casing: Decorative molding or framing around a window to cover the space between the frame and wall BREWSTER MCLEOD ARCHITECTS, INC. office(@brewstermcleod.com — www.brewstermcleod.com 112 South Mill Street, #B Top Floor— P.O. Box 697 — Aspen, CO 81611 — T 970/544.0130 — F 970/544.9201 126 South Oak Street, Unit A — Telluride, CO 81435 — T 970/728.4300 — F 9701544.9201 • • Window Sash Type I Top of Double Hung Sash Window Sash Exterior The joinery on the rail indicates a rather rough square cut. The edges are not consistent and have a more jagged edge. The technology necessary for precision may have not been available, thus requiring a hand -done cut. The curve, or radius, on the inside stile of the sash also indicates a hand -done cut. The technology to make a precise radius was not available. Exterior finish of all Type I windows is painted wood. Page 2 of 9 1J Window Sash Type II Top of Double Hung Sash Exterior The rail joinery in this photo indicates a more precise cut. There is more consistency and straighter lines. While technology for exact cuts may still not have been available, there is indication of a more advanced method for cutting and shaping the wood. Exterior finish of all Type II windows is painted wood. Page 3 of 8 • Window Sash Type III Sash Window Sash Exterior This photo suggests an evident jump in building technology. The joinery on this rail is precise and straight. There is no indication of a hand - done cut. The radius is precise and smoothly rounded. The specific sort of "groove" was not hand -cut, it was machine cut because the technology was available. Exterior finish is painted wood Page 4 of 8 Window Sash Type IV Window Sash Exterior This is a classic example of a 1980s window. The precise cuts and diverse set of grooves along the inside casing indicates advanced technology with a variety of available tools for cutting and shaping wood. There is intricate detailing with consistent measurements. Exterior finishes include wood, aluminum clad, or vinyl clad. Page 5 of 8 Sardy House: Door Construction We determined the different types of door construction used in the building of the Sardy House. The characteristics of each type indicate a specific timeline of building, thus determining each door's estimated period of construction. Generally, doors can be classified into several types, usually based on: • Placing of components • Method of construction • Working operations • Construction material used Rectangular, paneled doors are the most common in the Sardy House. Stiles, vertical members and rails make up the frame. The rails are grooved along the inner edges of the frame to receive the panels and they are mostly made up of timber or plywood. Bearing in mind the Queen Anne style roots of the Sardy House, most doors also include an art glass window in the upper half. Considering all main identifiers of these doors, we classified the different types in the Sardy House by studying each individual doors' mortise and tenon. What is a Mortise and Tenon? snoulAer mortise � O re�i w.ayr stft • Joint used by woodworkers to join pieces of wood at a 90' angle. • In its most basic form, the mortise and tenon comes together by the tenon • The tenon (sometimes referred to as a rail), is inserted into a square or rectangular hole cut into the corresponding stile. • We can also place the door types along a timeline based on the progression of woodworking technology. • The two (2) types on the next page are each categorized as Type I and Type II, with Type II being constructed in 1985; the most recent of Sardy House doors. Page 6 of 8 • • Door Construction Type I Mortise and Tenon The darker spot on the inside stile shows where the tenon entered the mortise to create the 90' angle. This indicates a much older and historical method for joining the rail and stile. The top photo shows an unpainted finish and the second is painted. Page 7 of 9 • • Door Construction Tvne I Exterior The exteriors of both doors show a paneled style with a window top -half. Page 8 of 9 n • Door Construction Type II Exterior This is a door built in 1985. It is a paneled door with a top half window, complete with various finishes as opposed to older exclusively wooden or painted doors. The panels are finished with a more innovative material, and the woodworking looks clean and precise. Overall, the 1980s marks a significant progression in technology across multiple channels. Woodworking specifically began to diversify. For example, the wooden bread box was developed in the 1980s—the curvature and overall advanced functionality of this design hints at the inevitable development of building styles as well. The gold panels are also very indicative of 1980s design trends. Page 9 of 9 f Y� Yf3p �.t. 4 2 Sardy House Interior Non -Historic Type III --Transom- TyneIII | W_ AFA 1�.�� -,JAM ALMCZ!�� Sardy House Door: 211 Exterior Glass: Non -Historic Frame: Type IV - , Sardy House Window: D Glass- Non -Historic Frame. Type IV 1 t �. 'V" 0 LJ f 1 �•y� I � I Sardy House Window: E Glass: Non -Historic 1 Frame: Type IV T ' ' t —L-4 rWindow: ouse N Exterior - �/ �'�='�-'--`' on -Historic rame:Type 1 - 4L "tom Y 1Ti1 ,wA 0 • Sardy House Window: N Interior Glass: Non -Historic Frame: Type I a Sardy House Window: P Exterior Glass: Non -Historic Frame: Type I 7W-11 Sardy House Window: P Interior Glass: Non -Historic Frame: Type I IL A 0 y � A-1 a Bill 11 te 1 7 I I .02 77 7 e N ' Sardy House Window: W Glass: Non -Historic Frame: Type III �z-.I - 1 .t Sardy House Window X Glass- Non -Historic Frame: Type I Sardy House Window: Y Glass: Non -Historic Frame: Type I r- • I"I It tL- baray mouse Window AA Glass: Non -Historic Frame: Type I , rIF, 'el-22 K. T/i ,, Y... `� ' � " , r y Sardy House Window: GGG Glass: Non -Historic Frame: Type IV Sardy House Window: XXX Glass: SG/GC Frame: Type I • ItIECEIVED EXHIBIT 9: Glass Inspection Letter Element Architectural Glass 'AUG 31209 Elissa Taylor -Owner CITY OF ASPEN P.O. Box 11464 CURWY Da Aspen, CO 81612 970.379.1773 Elissa e,ElementArchitecturalGlass.com www.ElementGlass. corn HISTORIC GLASS INSPECTION Property Inspected: Sardy House 128 E Main St Aspen CO 81611 Element Architectural Glass is a licensed historic restoration studio in Aspen, CO. EAG is a member of the National Trust for Historic Preservation and follows all protocols of the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. In particular we adhere to Preservation Brief 33 from the NPS, Dept. of Interior, which is The Preservation and Repair of Historic Stained and Leaded Glass brief and Preservation Brief 9 which is The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows from the NPS. Dept. of Interior. We also follow all restoration protocols from the Stained Glass Association of America and follow European restoration guidelines set forth by The Heritage Council. Inspection of the Sardy House on 7-31-17 • Window V 1 is a historic stained and leaded glass window that is original to the house. • Window CCC is undetermined at this time. Glue chipped glass is difficult to date because the same production methods are used today as were used 125 years ago (a horse hide glue is poured onto the glass and as it dries the top of the glass chips off, leaving the ferning pattern behind). Without any lead on the window to date it, we would need an inspection of the exterior putty/glazing of this window, which will require a ladder or scaffolding. • Window DDD is not original to the building and has no historic value. • Window EEE is not original to the building and has no historic value. • Window XXX is a historic stained glass window that was glue chipped and is original to the building. • Window YYY is undetermined at this time. Interior indications do not point to • C� original, historic glass, but rather point to replaced glass. An inspection of the exterior putty/glazing is necessary. • The other glass that was pointed out during the inspection was non historic and not orginal to the house. Recommendations • Window V 1 would benefit from an external thermopane. A thermopane is also called and Insulated Glass Unit. These units are built with two pieces of glass on either side of a breather strip/spacer. This is preferable to a storm window. • Window CCC would benefit from either an external thermopane or storm windows. Since there's no lead to be concerned about deteriorating, either option would suffice, though a thermopane will definitely increase energy efficiency. It is my recommendation to use thermopanes whenever possible, this window included. • Window XXX would benefit fi•om an external thermopane, though a storm window would be acceptable since there is no lead in this window that might deteriorate from lack of protection. All IG units must be installed on the exterior. All IG units must be inspected annually and replaced at the first sign of failure. If a failed IG unit remains in place over a leaded window there is the real possiblity of condesation on the stained and leaded window which will accelerate lead deterioration. Condesation will also negatively affect the putty/glazing compound in the leaded window. IG units are preferrable to single paned glass on the exterior for energy efficiency and protection of historic glass, but they must be maintained. If regular maintainance is not possible, storm windows would be advised. Please contact me with any questions. I am available for a site visit of the property to explain this inspection in more detail. Kind Regards, Elissa (Ellie) Taylor 0 A? I al IRL !a Page 1 of 1 August 8, 2017 Brewster Mcleod Architects 112 South Mill Street, Unit B, Top Floor Aspen Colorado 81611 RE: Sardy House Window Restoration Greetings Jamie, EXHIBIT 10: Glass Replacement Process INCORPORATING TECHNOLOGY INTO FINE CRAFTSMANSHIP RECEIVEI) AUG 31 2017 CITY OF FDE�LPO�j This is a follow up of our walk through review for the windows XX and YY which can be applied to existing windows throughout the project. Replacing the single pane glass panels with new 3/4" or 1/2" thick thermal insulated glass will require part of the window sash to be removed to accept the new glass. RL Woodworks and Design will router out part of the sash to accept the insulated panels. 5/8" will be removed for 3/4" thick glass thermal panels or 3/8" will be removed for 1/2" thick thermal glass panels. The thickness has yet to be determined. The integrity of the historic windows will not be jeopardized by removing part of the sash frame for the new glass. Once finish is reapplied the windows will look just as they were prior to being removed(painted or natural). My recommendation for the new glass would be to use I%" thick glass instead of the'/z" glass. The reason behind this is the existing larger window sash's are bowed and deflected. When we silicone the new glass into the existing sash the glass will act as a structural straight edge and the intent is to have the glass help hold the sash frames straight. This will also help if we apply the bronze meeting rail weather stripping. As is on the larger windows the weather stripping meeting rail will not work due to the gap caused by the bowing and deflection on some of the larger window units. We can review other options if the meeting rail is not acceptable. Providing a mockup of the window sash with new insulated glass would be the best option to present to HCP. Looking forward to presenting the mock up to HCP! Respectfully, Chul Lee 2525 49th Street : Boulder, CO 80301 : Phone 303.440.1991 : Fax 303.447.2128 rlwoodworksanddesign.com MEMORANDUM Date: August 24, 2017 Project: Sardy House Re: Queen Anne Style Review EXHIBIT 11: Queen Anne Period Review From: Teraissa A. McGovern Sardy House, 128 E Main St, Aspen, CO • Built in circa 1893 for John W Atkinson • Late Victorian, Queen Anne style • 2 stories External wall material: Brick Bricks made in Aspen by John W Atkinson's father, John Atkinson • Roof configuration: Cross gabled with hip at center • Round turret in southwest corner, octagonal turret at center of east facade. • Decorative wood shingles and cresting along roof ridges • Double -hung windows with stone lintels and sills • Foundation is sandstone • Purchased in 1945 by Tom Sardy who converted the main floor into a Mortuary and second floor into the primary living space • Carriage house built in 1985 and the house was renovated by Harry Teague Architects • Interior renovation by Robin Scott Interiors in 2002 • Areas of historical significance are: Architecture of the late 1800's silver mining era Representative of a family/home environment of a successful business person during the silver mining era • Most original features and materials remain on the exterior of the structure • Located within a designated historical district • Special features: Stained glass; roof cresting, decorative shingles, porch, chimney, fence 1" -01 Sardy House, 1975 Sardy House, 2015 BREWSTER MCLEOD ARCHITECTS, INC. office(c)brewstermcleod.com — www.brewstermcleod.com 112 South Mill Street. #B Top Floor— P.O. Box 697 — Aspen, CO 81611 — T 970/544.0130 — F 970/544.9201 126 South Oak Street, Unit A — Telluride, CO 81435 — T 9701728.4300 — F 970/544.9201 0 • Queen Anne Characteristics Eclectic, asymmetry, contrast, variety of surface textures, irregular/asymmetrical massing. spindlework porch supports with lace -like brackets corbelled brick chimneys, typically box -like plans, monumental chimneys • Materials: o Patterned brick o Stonewood shingles and clapboard o Slate o Stucco (occasionally) o Terracotta panels o Custom -molded and colored bricks • Roof: o Steeply pitched & complex o Elaborate & decorative trim * Typically, wooden or slate roofs • Windows o Sash windows o Leaded or stained glass o Patterned panes o Bay windows • Doors o Simple, rectangular, raised -panel o Upper half of the door usually includes art glass o Side doors, back doors and other doors less elaborate Delicately carved decorations surrounding a single large pane set into the upper portion of door • Interior Detailing o "Floorcloths" in halls and kitchens o Linoleum floors o Fireplaces with glazed tiles & built-in cupboards o Fireplaces as focal point for room —display shelves, seats, decorate panels, art o Oriental rugs o Built-in cabinets with an arched canopy o Walnut. cherry & maple wood species Page 2 of 4 EAM 6/8/2017 Queen Anne History. • 0 A method of expression of the optimistic exuberance of Victorian America. • England and France origin • Popular from roughly 1880 to 1910 • First American Queen Anne house: (probably) the half-timbered Watts —Sherman House in Newport, Rhode Island, built in 1874 by Boston architect H.H. Richardson: Watts Sherman House, before 1897 alterations Now, the house serves as an upperclassmen dormitory at Salve Regina University Walt Sherman House, current • The Queen Anne style represented the culmination of the romantic movement of the 191'1 century • Richard Norman Shaw was the most prominent architect in England to promote the Queen Anne style; inspired by a mix of earlier Tudor; pre -Georgian, and late medieval styles • The last two decades of the nineteenth century saw Queen Anne become the most dominant residential style in the U.S., heavily favored by the Victorian elite who had become wealthy from industrial growth • The style became popular in the United States through the use of pattern books and the publishing of the first architectural magazine The American Architect and Building News • The Carson Mansion, a home in Eureka Old Town, California and the Painted Ladies in San Francisco, California are considered a prime examples of American Queen Anne Style: t'11 The Painted Ladies, San Francisco CA The Carson Mansion. Eureka Page 3 of 4 EAM 6/8/2017 0 • Sources: AspenVictorian. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 June 2017. "Queen Anne." Architectural Styles of America and Europe. Architectural Styles of America and Europe, 20 Nov. 2011. Web. 08 June 2017. "Queen Anne Style — 1876 to 1915." What Is Queen Anne Style? Antique Home Style, 2015. Web. 06 June 2017. "Queen Anne Style (1880-1910)." Queen Anne Style Architecture Facts and History I Guide to Architectural Styles I Home Remodeling & Architecture in Maryland (MD). Virginia (VA), Washington, DC. Wentworth Design Consultation, 29 June 2015. Web. 06 June 2017. "Queen Anne Style Architecture." Wikipedia. Wikipedia, 27 May 2017. Web. 07 June 2017. "10 Masterpieces of Victorian Architecture." 10 Masterpieces of Victorian Architecture - History Lists. H-story Lists, 2016. Web. 07 June 2017. BREWSTER MCLEOD ARCHITECTS, INC. office(a�brewstermcleod.com — www.brewstermcleod.com 112 South Mill Street, #B Top Floor — P.O. Box 697 — Aspen, CO 81611 — T 970/544.0130 — F 970/544.9201 126 South Oak Street, Unit A — Telluride, CO 81435 — T 970/728.4300 — F 970/544.9201 2 PROPOSED ELEVATION - NORTH I EXISTING ELEVATION - NORTH . EXHIBIT 12- 1w Reconfiguration at Alley and Connecting Element '1 71, �; - - I I !. • • k �7i i' WOW - �•' _ �Nil a e,r�a�s ��e : _z.. ��_, .` -- ..- ....,.............,.,......................... ................ .................... .............••—..•....._.,,..�,.�...—.��,_. P.O..eo. s9� Au .CO$1912 B�MJA 1125ouVi Ml Streal.•Top. W T 970.5U.0170 SARDY HOUSE - 11 X 17 ��•• *2won HPc SCf�lf.: NTS ����C F 970.541.9M1 BREWSTER WLECO ARCHITECTS TiuOA,: 126 Swu o11. S9-" TeW .M 014M www.prawslsmriaE.00m T 970.728 4" ASPEN,CO PROJECI: SARDY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2 PROPOSED ELEVATION - WEST I EXISTING ELEVATION - WEST BMA s, w nw1 s ,m PA. boa B9, �arym. CO Bf6i2 SARDY HOUSE - 11 X 17 e7vob SCALE: NTs HPC T 9/O.S14.01 J' F 91O.SAA 920i PROJECT: 2 BREWST ER N1, LEDD ARCH I I LC:IS TMuddc 126S mC� 5t—M ASPEN, CO n ...... .,•..e ,m. l...,l r: TOA,b CC 8I435 1910 . 12B. n IIID SARDY ''° '° 1 11 - I '', NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION or A.Oen NeYn'v Nou,e O W M�SI Ay.n wmrrc.l SefY+r O ATM 0 RECEIVEJ) 'AUG 311D7 CITY Omvmpw F ASPEN cftk*Y EXHIBIT 13: Site Vicinity Map 0 O R.� [YSY CtrvRi tiw M+ J—O—S. -O �M • vmnr-m f.w rvonom... O . MulJI Su.M f.e n', Vo.ry f�•e M O ..nr..r n.rrr .O O EM.ot, Y.•.f (i,lw rn ALY • EXHIBIT • r--I LJ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 128 East Main Sheet, Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: October 11"1, 2017 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, Jamie L. Brewster McLeod (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By tlue publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. X Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which fonn was obtained from the Cominunity Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 25 day of September, 2017, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign)Is •attRched.hgpp qQ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obt` 4 ftoin.. theCominunity Development Department, which contains the information describ6ii iiSection 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) • Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection �'n the planning agency during all business hours for fi en (15) days prior to a public hearing on such amendments. Signature 0 The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this2-E5� " of _, 20a, by , (Lb LNOTARY AISSA A MCGOVERN WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC TE OF COLORADO ID 2000A0261�17commission expires:SION EXPIRES JAN, 06, , otary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 • k- _ UB*LIC NOTICE � Da"Item, Wednesday, Oct. 11, 2017 Time: 4:30 P.m. Place: 130 S. Galena St., City Hall. Council Chambers Purpose: HPC will consider an application by � BTRSardy, LLC,128 E. Main Street, 0 Aspen, CO, 81611, affecting this property. The applicant requests approval for energy and safety upgrades to historic and non -historic windows on this building and changes to windows in the rear addition. For further information contact Aspen Plannina Dept. at 970-429-2758. r•-\ r \ , i f.. ._ , .mac..,._• '1F - r. �► .` ' '.ter, ,' • . t 41 y AV Ot PUBLIC NOTICE -Isom": Wednesday, Oct.r . f — _ - alena St.. City Hall, Council Chambers 1 4 — •• R `HPC will 11TConsider V -.. . application " - ' r� AAspen, Co. Property. Th affecting this I applicant w approval upgrades to historic win.1 . ' ' ` _ build - nos changes to windows in tile rear addition. J! 4. yj For information contact ept at r' 970429Aspe,,-2758 r, IF /\ 41t•'� �t M ('t�� ,�'�?' Yt�T• :CAI �' � �} �* K; '� � � th ',. , , a h,,- �r �� t '�1•LkYhf�' 'r �.�y�1s►� k�"yya 34!'' � y ��' 4 j � i �' t•�.��y�y� �;7'iT��'%f A t � 7 _}S - - r'r�j„�, f'�L, 1. '...' �S �•�•. �''I'- .�t. .t �-Y.a-'V���� � �' L� - °• ,!'�.'