Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
landuse case.es.360 Lake Ave.0021.2013.ASLU
THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0021.2013.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735.1213.2001 PROJECTS ADDRESS 360 Lake Ave PLANNER SARA ADAMS CASE DESCRIPTION Hallam Lake Bluff Review REPRESENTATIVE STEEV WILSON 279-4109 DATE OF FINAL ACTION 1/18/2013 CLOSED BY DJAMA MARTIN ON: 02/07/2014 2 EJIe Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help Jump X 44 Man Custom Fields Routing Status Fee Summary Actions Routing iiistory .......... ............................................. .......... ..........- .......... .......... ................................................. ...................... ..................... ... .................. 0 z ; C Permit type �aslu i�spen Land Use Permit# 0021.2013.AS LU :-7 Address 360 LAKE AVE Apt/Suite l ......................................................... ...... .............................................................................. State C0 Zip 0 0- city ASPEN 0 Permit Information .................. � 0 Routing queue aslu07 Applied 03/27/2013 Master permit Status pending Approved Z Project ....... .. .......... Description E SA-8040 G R E E N LI N E Issued Closed/Final 01 Expires 70i/22/2Oi4 Submitted FSTE�Vl�iILS611 279-4166 Clock'Runnin �1 Days i ............ .......... ..........- ...................... --—------—-------............--................ Submitted via: I Owner ............ ........... .......... ............- ........................... Last name 'BURCH 3 First name.DENNIS PO BOX 1860 BENTONVILLE AR 72712 Phone Address Applicant Owner is applicant? ❑Contractor is applicant? BURCH First name DENNIS I PO BOX 1860 Last name .................... BENTONV ILLE AR 72712 ............................ Phone Cust# 29467 Address ................................ Lender i Last name First name ......................... Phone Address AspenGoId5(setVeT) jackiek 1 of YLI A AN PA M 4L�i RECEPTION#: 599796, 05124/2013 at 10:54:28 AM, 1 OF 5, R $31.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION N0. 12, (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 360 LAKE AVENUE, LOT I OF THE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-182-24-008 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Bell 26, LLC, represented by Steev Wilson of Forum Phi, Inc. requesting approval of Hallam Lake Bluff Review to remodel the existing residence; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for Hallam Lake Bluff Review; and, WHEREAS,the property is zoned Medium Density Residential (R-6); and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 14, 2013, continued to May 21, 2013, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 12, Series of 2013, by a six to zero ( 6 — 0) vote, approving Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director,the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Arca Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and 'Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO THAT: Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page I of 4 Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions, as shown in Exhibit A. Section 2: Hallam Bluff Reconstruction A site plan detailing areas of impact on Hallam Bluff, specifically the location of excavation, depth of excavation, type of machinery, storage of materials, location of utility connections and other items shall be submitted with the building permit. Parks shall approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit approval process. Hallam Bluff Stabilization: Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for protection of the Hallam Lake Bluff. The detailed plan shall identify the location of erosion control measures. The project is subject to Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) standards. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for construction staging. This plan shall detail how the construction will take place with staging, storage of materials and locations of vehicles so that any trees remaining on site will not be impacted and to prevent unnecessary impacts to the Hallam Lake Bluff. The Parks and Engineering Department shall approve the final slope stabilization plan. The work should be designed and completed by a company that has experience in this specific line of work. The company of choice shall provide examples and an understanding of the history working with this type of stabilization. Site Protection: The applicant should detail how the existing structure and other improvements will be accessed, removed and restored without creating additional impacts to the undisturbed portions of the property along the Bluff. Section 3: Parks Department: Re-vegetation/Restoration: Parks requires approval of a full re-vegetation or restoration plan that should include seed mix, plant species, irrigation and a noxious weed control plan. Approval of the landscape plan and building permit is contingent on an approved re-vegetation plan. Noxious Weed: The contractor shall be responsible for the control of noxious weeds during a one year warranty period. The City of Aspen shall perform monthly inspections of the area during construction. Inspection of materials: The contractor will be required to provide a fax, hand deliver or participate in a on-site inspection of the specifications for the seed mix, certified weed free straw and top soil. Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 2 of 4 Irrigation: Restoration areas require supplemental above ground irrigation system. Irrigation shall be installed in a manner that provides full coverage of the disturbed area for a period of two years. Section 4: Engineering Slope Reconstruction: The slope reconstruction is subject to Engineering and Parks Departments approval. The location and degree of the slope shall be verified in the field. Significant changes to the slope shall require a substantial amendment by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. Section 5: The proposed project is subject to a floor area amendment to the Erdman Partnership Lot Split by Aspen City Council. Section 6: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section S: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 21" day of May,2013. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNI AND ZONING Debbie Quinn,Asst. City Attorney CLrpam er,Chdir Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 3 of 4 OWN ATTEST: v ckie Lothian, putt'City Clerk Exhibit A: approved site plan Resolution No. 12, Series 2013 Page 4 of 4 FORUM PHI 360 LAKE • j I i -- marac ]a0 a Aw � Apr.CO Bta„ oI `4°� n tic . e� n 1 t � - i CONEULTAertb OEOTECH CONTRACTOR SHEET TITLE B 1 .2 FILL COVERAGE PftOPO3EO SH[WiiH,+c wf .EfM1I II: l� i !: GARAGE NOT PART X PHASE, FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:866770.5585 360 LAKE � 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave j Aspen,CO 81611 i j I 0 C OR \\ •` GARDEN SHED tiP 9^ STEVEN WILSON 402127 ��/ SED ARO' � 1 f --7 \\ i/ CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton 1� f f\\ _ \ // i f / -=� Professional Land Surveyor 1.,, 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen.CO 81611 970 5449952 - 1 CIVIL TEID V 1 \ I 1 I ; Fj l wdYoP F,/bLIJFP GEOTECH TBD PROPO peso \ \ ��� ♦ ,r,.-r,. � 1 _.� % / i i 7 0 0P fSF LGF� STRUCTURAL w eAe -- A �•v ♦ �%i/ i i i i i i / CONTRACTOR i .., 850 T BD i i i 562013 GE OF UT10N _- -.— AREADF EXISTING REVEGAtA HARDSCAPE 5/9/13 BLUFF REVIEW SD M/D7YV NOT FOR CONS7. PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE B 1 .2 FILL COVERAGE PROPOSED SITE WITH NEW COVERAGE FILL 1/8" = 1'-0" 114 i/ I 111. • �i FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave o� Aspen,CO 81611 O pF CO,OR9 \` - r STEVEN WILSON 402127 U A r kSFD AF1C'� .........- \\ i CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton '\. - Y \,^ ✓J J I Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 ^•.,., J /j— (970)5449952 CIVIL TBD ly i ti�`q i i i r :I N TO B FF f �\ HARDSCAPE GEOTECH` i `.`f ! 78D N, ROP En TOP BL F HA SC E ^\ STRUCTURAL TBD HARDSCAPE.: ".. ROOFDec" _ CONTRACTOR ` TBD 1 511&2013 -0FPUBl1U0N04 SHA AR TO STO AN R AT / 5!9113 BLUFF REVIEW / SD M/D/VV NOT FOR CONS7. PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY. SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE B 1 . 1 FILL COVERAGE EXISTING SITE WITH NEW COVERAGE FILL 1/8" 1'-0'• � � I i 1 � Areas contributing to storm _ water discharge and -- - discharge locations. „ T i �- >•� �?Sr� �`ffi'*�� d+� per!'�:_ ���;'•f -i - � y; i ."tom j+��1� �,{ "►�' � ' Looking d. discharge area to the lake. etrer Y.4,,��'+ti��� �I �� �¢ •:�- .- V di��' •;��„itS"': � - �. 11 �pq( \ fir. Ij 4k_... s • r I i° w o Z3 p (0 Q 0- (D Fp, n v zr l< a) CA) (C) � CD 0 y I,q 4 0 I T 6 r.iI ,. .3 OV , s � ate. 5 'i �� d' �t< •,� h�,t��`� ,fix'/ •1, ,,,�a' r� a �' �� Y rf ,` ` dam`^ �•,���'�� �� . - �(J 4+. « �' t •,gyp *'3 { V i�4 �n�t•'� " �i � K'" �L+' t�.I� Ji�Sh+`S•3y�'�yt + •d�& + w�'�1��j� 3 '' `•' ,• '� ',�}�' t1 : , #3 View of roof collection and discharge pipe over bluff a 5, M u:�i1rP'��'t9�.�r!� i✓�:,�:.;.,{"`�',�t�ifYw,�i'd ns.",� ^f�,lA r `I i 1 <� #3 Gutter discharge pipe Ar FF � fw� � _ tom'+ /��• + L, r + �� f/M a� a{y.r :t ` Ids-•- ,..^ � ,./< i�� ��;:��'� ���< x ` ' 7,. ,` T� •�f � �-��'i/7S .TIM'." Y��1/�y� `,� it 1 'xTO, wj;N/��.;�f•SI i;�' - - � ....,fit �' ILA, ��� Y J � x VA VI IJA Y ,����'�'�" � � '!�E����� � ', '�i � f y ^yam � � •— • •� • 1'^' _ •, :is. •.�� y , �� �;a� y yid: � ,r�1�w, .�� � __ _ .� ti-• t,� .mac r "} � +' �`,c�s z Sl �_ f` - •4_� ••1 t • t�'� � �. /'( f y` ^�' .{� w�w ��L� `' ''Rye`�JJ_ M1 - � `��..'f'S._� ,eft• �, •I t - � •�K t+ !'_} f.•�� NA LAI No 9 r /p' wyl ,.r+�' MIC�'i. Rai' Wr, K `HMV .•k old is marge aredfior..gutters'- on�i.throug4a piP�.rr„ {A v !. Ate•* .,l.j��.t�'� � .1. ''.,due ''��r��.�.� ... � +�1 -, IL.?r—r�. _ R I _ l #6 discharge gutter over ground r ; l" _ '1'' I. t \ V ROF ! IN OV.t • � � -;;� 'T+�' jam:, � i ,r�ti', s i' i Yg '1 e l �� ? � ? i� it ��y^ , ,. ;•'1 ik NX I #7 Collection area - i S. - u t 1 i • v .> dzw- r, s ti r Atm #8 Area of discharge ff'1�5 r' fir f►' S1t ��.�.�F t�1P 11 ,! lK �y�, e1+F• r; ' � "ia i►�"'•S`sue _ _ .,.- I �'`!a ♦ �sic,���' �4L,p r yje*u} a s ; f�" !�— ��" �t r}s1'S .yy��.�ti'�1,,yiiL•;�a6 ` t _ I -- - :�=.�.. i1t�,1'�k7t,r - � - ' J w � � c i rn i d s 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW PRESENTED BY: STEEV WILSON MAY 21,20B PARTNER,AIA,LEED AP • I� • 0 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 �' 0 c� 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 • j/ I 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 • j • TO BE DEMOLISHED r F s .rl 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 �' �II e 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 • 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 • j • • O • 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 • 1 I ------------------------------------------------------------- -_ -- -�-- f SEE SF � BEE>if ,v I 1 r Y tr r � on. r SEE SE ! ESE + SEEw i/ r--1 -'r -• j . \ -«----------•-•-------------------------}---------------- « }F I BEE E BFE _ SEE BB Sam ----- - -- 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 r -- ----------------r r ' • 1 4aa.aa-. � I _ -FYI ..._; IY 1 1 1 ,Ir 1 a^--tea as aaaaa 1 l a-aa-al t{f1 1 ,ti i rr- I � 1 � r 1 ...........- M 1--� - ------ r..Y Saurn uvr • 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 • • r--'---;r_ ,+-----'-,---jr-------------------- -�--------- -(„ r--- ---------------------{ , , r - t---- -- 1 ---' _ ---_ -t=-'- - -- 1 l_ SEE BE SN EEE ----------------- .�_ -- r r . i ��� r i ------- --------- �r , r r r r � ; '1 '---------------------------------'------.i _a._-_ .___-----_-----'___-r-_---.-_._.a--_--_.----_---_-----__-__--_-_.d.__t_ -.0.0mr.-M were�.olrt.wr 1 P F. • �__..___r::r_._ _ -_ _ , n r , r r ----- ----- ' ---- --_4- '---- I '' r 0 .IIOIO9F0YI)tlrw EN1 111010lYGml • 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVEW MAY 21,2013 • I 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 j •I` • 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 • • ALL EXPOSURE SOUTH EAST NORTH NORTH EAST SOUTH EAST EXIS71NG ROOF _ PROPOSED ROOF A 11.50 A 65.75 EXISTING WALL 254. 89.75 37.50 164.75 317.50 B 41925 B 62.2 293.75 1.25 122.25 64.75 C 120.50 C 97.75 700 8.75 D $7.75 D 69.00 27.75 E 184.75 E 251.50 8.75 F 1 49.25 F 16.00 0.50 G 26.25 G 43.00 SUB TOTAL 254. 390.5 $4.51 287 382.25 H 79.00 H 38.75 -- - - - J 127.75 1 2.00 TOTAL 1398.7 K 28.25 K 138. L 34.50 L 130.25 PROPOSED WALL 206.7 350.25 6.00 70.75 20.25 M 1.50 M 82. 13.50 18.75 9.75 99.75 82. B TOTAL - 206.7 465.51 124.5 70.75 20.25 OTAL 1178,ITOTAL 998.7 TOTAL 887.7 %IMPROVE D 15.40 %IMPROVED 1 36.53 a 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 • • N' C. ,+ �1� FT ��' jar � I •I' •�� 1.. f r 'tit• A — ��t , �it�4? i 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVEW MAY 21.2013 l t �M 14 i r ? i 360 LAKE AVENUE HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW MAY 21,2013 V4 ir Wall luminaires_fully shielded Recessed wall luminaires Shielded • Recessed ceiling luminalresfor wet locations faceplate STAINLESS STEEL Wall luminaires with directed light mmnmm��re.aanie iwoe ma awwuni 9awren�wu w.as+ TYPa; • 9� tlsen alaYmmli°3v:•a i'ogagma BC-GA Product: ,u,l as rrs sa _ las amuea omen: w,fal na canPmm�Nefn.q Tom' NasxP COnp percale cmismxen Dam caws PuaP.x noauq eaowaaee '.. uo-mwar�l.mnacem M m aw Vatege: aesn nwm BEGA ROdua: orm ewmm� i� amoa 'nwnvwa.ns atm♦a.. ue SEGA Product: awe a+e W.coaarw su,.xniro men o wa Type: • . .a�Nm�saslF� CZ:: c a�eeae9 .. Il�w i«rev ��t am°w.:sAx.: el.a+®a ea rrwpa Mtma l°I®me�am.wm Pmlect, arca.e.a. mr.•:.m BEGA Prod. nnpw vmawa aoe�wn aaNamaeea scow Optons: ue a.e e.�oi W 11 so es r" pee m°umvass xv�e In nanoic+'w�tlro'irmcx�ew.ea 9a�. Wlt (a frnmac lime vanev nml ve ertemmno� P • ,mw.aw,�Pwm�a D�9amelmw�ml�m,ex e eeax�Tmweae.dweP��ga�m6m FORUM PHI Moditletl: am.e soar I.mee3 mo sao-1 � eaon+cr'uneun Mmn e. .Fuh aauam nP werre a e' Deaxx l.�wv,a ,wa:mi cz<oa¢svn. w co-�v.,°u ry,�.rpa m. opt Pe Cobr. �,amermmee�aP Vo6ag Hopei zsvuvalnn�watscen ae weranlc yixu+°ei Cmlee nua.®cw� p� .px Modified: le�m®nla'M� 3z pre � i � Gptiona: .'..amrwe. wu eaor: m.aY °aP' xro.Na.pnena wno. Mooted. Elmmm tnv un a.«nre,..3lolw x3°ea Options: 117 SOUthS Spring 7s c. pemeae.m,Pp Ixvlm„p,zrry a«e Madlfled: P ng Street.Suite 202 smiarm lu. wema'm.eaei—l zo em„q;znvi.c a.pmelPUe e.ewre.,e mw l y. a�a3 mace, Aspen.Colorado 81611 a awpN.aea&PPmea,.eNmfmaPn nPwe � 11 zw�mmmoBa: �m°�m � s m.w �sle or�o mw�mo>e�nwws000m„ru,mes P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 Qal°m mwrsxvlle3mmeeN weer. P.w'plv1-75°e.nwidee Wtitxo(21'r;NPI v Y+S rcue mpvawea wY3.i�,,a mama ns w>me apwan Cnl.avwedeinamoK �arovsua nxse^a'rpvwmw U.LII leom6 wd bdwre. fxkne eadex �vmar moon tlees IPSS. 195 cn0:aoe mm.Naroweer. eeFGA aol°m.aaa reuo: uL F.,ee.amaea Im..al amlme.A°I ry mmn,gamma-..lane:swo-rs haven�Pwa e.a law.wm. Nle MMn:Rmze 19151:slue 4VV1.2 merry.sM e� xievn a l;Ie m�d m Polon�e:Tarooa p mime-nbCe.Paraem en m rntlwee ee a.oleos me.eella G.Nmn�m m— � w mpePeN am emroll.,a„m. 360 LAKE IPSS, x.a e 3N 26 Bell LLC m°'nm 190Bi 360 Lake Ave J Aspen,CO 81611 OF co, STEVEN * WILSON ■-�■' 402127 � U a` 1:';7�Iler' tis PO Aa G`t m mnwe �y I9 .cl rt CONSULTANTS z»+. 1 z3wff,.ea.., lam .e, I - ae<em.aww.wP,waer SURVEYOR •"•m e a°.1.. _;z _ m aYmmrwl.m.wma P m wT a e Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor 13EDA9U9 taco a6oA wy.cam meb,cA em131ece1 eea-1x33 FAx te3s)seo-si>e www.lw9a,,,awn �.,«ao•Pa,,,A l.m 13 ri.° °r tl In e'o.dw. Mew.cf e„sm ss sv.su a+.1 Ra worm rn lzw lm nv. .a, awe 726 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 w. eFCn rs xaos 7mem ae o9egaue tom eECAw r c.rpmela aASaor3 tegsf 9e4-ss2a FAA(wslsea-sa7a www.he6e-ae.mm n, ._ - 725 ernete 62 a*wv Il .w.lZx,ln a wP wlr' aEM�Ua tmp BEOq weY.CeNMlerla,CA m013(96518ea-m33 FA%(aD51....ta wew.pega-us.00m seen-US 1—GAW.,-on—,CA93013(aoa) -m33 M(ms)59a-9074 www.pepa-u¢eom �w s[nAU[yllo u,xro eJY10 ctrq+lyn RLAlSx31x tg1aW 11712 " CIVIL TBD o m GEOTECH O TBD N s Z s `— g ,a b`z J z' a yq a o s � ' STRUCTURAL R� z ; 'A z TBD 0 It TCBOGNTRACTOR E, - s om g� 5- m 5� ` 9 'z �g 7 v s� ��nC � �m�• Y11(11J DATE OFPVBUCATION o. .d � r °° N . :d o o r m C s • G oR' —� z m z 3/12/13 BLUFF REVIEW r — ; IT T—— NOT FOR CONST. IT r ~ ~ i c z D ----� PROJECT NO: 1207 z DRAWN BY: SMW € Sy S N 4'�� S q° N `` _ J' COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC El • Z= m£ m — m O G $ �o won 21 0 �P�zP9 p p o zm o � y N O O I J 4 Z l� g '♦1e�1nw utiMiei n,°�m,Mnf a.el+rm WALL LUMINAIRE W/SHIELpED 11GN7 SWRCE i ♦ mbm,r`,�wn<ennen,u nrmmum e.eyrs 22261 SHEET TITLE eyu, nww„�M aaoYfen RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRE—LIXIYERS ♦ ^^Nwx, P p l.: 12961.566 min M. 9aE Me orY.2 15 07 24911 13 mm ES 110 4 2010 frrr.e 22261 • e 0 SCALE: NONE—DO NOT SCALE DRAWING gyps( e,.6/1&11 Re Nr�12W 565 tnxm be r°M em° elm Fremwom nA.xgrla 23601ED tep1 eon .n a,s a -1 el°"q p.e�f, WALL LUMINAIRE W1TH SHALLOW PROJECTION SCALE: NONE—DO NOT SCALE DRAWING Em�maPr mm 9 m a ��rnM ES or. 11 12 2012 m—2111 aoo e.ae way SCALE- NONE— DO NOT SCALE DRAWING .�a,a EXTERIOR LIGHT SPECS e I I I - --Lj FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 I P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 I 360 LAKE I 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 II 1V It o DF C04 STEVEN WILSON 402127 ti U o�rysep APC'�\�� -- -- - CONSULTANTS - --- SURVEYOR _� — - -- - Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Ceetery Lane j - r 1 3 LID -❑ ------ 3 - sio)544 995211 4 I- �i m - CIVIL I J TBD GEOTECH F. I 0 go a I STRUCTURAL TBD _ F CONTRACTOR TBD I-�• / J, I J A � vyzol3 oaiE OF nusucnnoN -.�:.. _-•,�_.,� -.v ...�! 1 I -.i�1 I I. 1.' ;. .,.Si.-�. .4". < \... / ' ,'. I .1 3112/13 BLUFF REVIEW "I-Cr �.•( ." I L.' "I �; /-� ,.�� < i l SO M/D/YY NOT FOR CONST. r ( _ �•�- ,l. l l' /r r I ( 1 _ _ l ( l 1. I PROJECT NO: 1207 v r ; DRAWN BY' BMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC '.- -Q LIGHTING PLAN 1/4" = V-0 LIGnM LEGEND SHEET TITLE N ��SEE Z2A FOR SPECIRCATIONS 11 RemseetlN! oatlo°Ca° Z2.03 E�+S.'LVII EXTERIOR 0 LIGHTING PLAN FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Coloratlo 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 360 LAKE 26 RECEIVED 60 Bell LAC 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 MAY 16 2013 CITY OF ASPEN OF CotoR STEVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WILSON y N * WILSON 402127 U oFNSFD ARO�\�4r CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR B 1.0 BLUFF REVIEW Robert C.Hutton B 1.1 EXISTING SITE PLAN rofessional Land Surveyor 25 Cemetery Lane B 1.2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN pen,CO 81611 81.3 EXISTING SITE 970)544-9952 B 1.4 PROPOSED SITE CIVIL Z7.01 EXISTING PLANS TBD Z7.02 IPLANS Z7.03 EXISTING PLANS 27.04 PLANS HALLAM LAKE Z7.05 EXISTING PLANS GEOTECH 27.06 PLANS TBD 27.07 EXISTING ROOF Z7.08 ROOF PLAN BLUFF REVIEW 28.01 ELEVATIONS Z8.02 ELEVATIONS STRUCTURAL 28.03 ELEVATIONS TBD 28.04 ELEVATIONS Z9.01 SECTIONS Z9.02 SECTIONS B 2.1 BLUFF REVIEW CONTRACTOR 822 BLUFF REVIEW TBD 82.3 BLUFF REVIEW 83.1 1 BLUFF REVIEW B4.1 BLUFF REVIEW 842 BLUFF REVIEW B 4.3 BLUFF REVIEW W1�13 DAMOrnsuCAnoN B 4.4 BLUFF REVIEW 3112113 BLUFF REVIEW SD IWD/YY NOT FOR CONST. PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: BMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE B 1 .0 BLUFF REVIEW v v FORUM PHI 117 S—th Surno Sleet,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 (P P.970,279 F.866.770.5585 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 \ of III OF Cot y \ I STEVEN * WILSON \ / o 402127 � O I FNSFD AR4�� EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF PROPOSED TOP OF BLUFF CONSULTANTS (HISTORI SURVEYOR C) Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor Cemeteete ry Lane s pp en,4 970)544-9952 9952 CIVIL TBD GEOTECH \♦ J _ -- / .� / - _ TBD HARDSCAPE — - / STRUCTURAL / HARDSCAPE TBD CONTRACTOR ` HARDSCAPE 'z TBD DE SHADED AREA ROOF CK TO RESTORE 1I 1 3 DRTe OFw CAno,i AND REVEGATATE 3/12/13 BLUFF REVIEW SO MID/YY NOT FOR CONST. PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE EXISTING SITE 1/8" = 7'-0" B 1 . 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN FORUM PHI 117 Soule Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P 970 279.4157 F:866.770.5585 360 LAKE v 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 A C�OF C04 pR STEVEN O� * WILSON 402127 ti I y O I � 05�4Q°� EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF PROPOSED TOP OF BLUFF CONSULTANTS (HISTORIC) So artcEHOR I rofeseional Land Surveyor 25 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 11 970)544-9952 j CIVIL LINE OF \' - -- __ `�.\ - /' / 7BD EXISTING I HARDSCAPE 1 j I I GEOTECH / I TBD __- -— STRUCTURAL TBD � J � CONTRACTOR TBD STI U OB SHADED AREA REMOVED TO RESTORE &iMY AND \ — OF — — e+] onre aF nreuanoa REVEGATATE ING HA PE O BE ED 3/1MI2113 BLUFF REVIEW SO DIYY NOT FOR CONST. PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE PROPOSED SITE 118" = 1'-0° B 1 .2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN _ _ _ _ _ - .•IL S_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _L • V i 1 I • � I i0'FRONT YA D • SETBACK (IPER 25 PLAT ) • 10'sErencK_ • FORUM PHI LANDSCAPE KEY 117 South Spring Street,Suits 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 EVERGREEN TREES 360 LAKE COTTONWOOD ` 26 Bell LLC TREES TO BE REMOVED 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 O ASPEN EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF TREES `—'; TO BE REMOVED Qo�S� / \ I PROPOSED TOP OF BLUFF _ - OF �C EVERGREEN I o (HISTORIC) ���'� h TO DEMO Q/ , y STEVEN P * WILSON COTTONWOOD 1� \ / OQ/��� 402127 u TO DEMO ASPEN T?4 TO DEMO -� I�/ - �� CONSULTANTS NEW ' /' SURVEYOR EVERGREEN Robert C.Hinton �\ /' Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane NEW Aspen,C081611 COTTONWOOD \ - (970)544-9962 �-- - -•- � - CIVIL TBD + � NEW ASPEN 20 SETBACK ❑ GRASS • i p I_ _- TBDOTECH ' WATER PROPERTY LINE STRUCTURAL ■ 0' DE AIR TBD LANDSCAPE � �m PLANTERS \ 9 ET C ER P 4 LANDSCAPE � CONTRACTOR BOULDERS TBD w1sQ013 DRTE OF PUBLIUnON _ I 519113 BLUFF REVIEW MID/YY I NOT FOR CONST. _ PROJECT NO: 1207 _ DRAWN BY: SMW — COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE EXISTING SITE 1/8• = 1-0• B 1 .3 EXISTING SITE 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I �0'FRONT VgRD 25 PLAT< BE�eACK IPFA ) • Ii Pr L 10'SETBACK • FORUM PHI LANDSCAPE KEY I I _ _ -- {, I I 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 ! P - Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279A157 F:866.770.5585 EVERGREEN TREES 360 LAKE COTTONWOOD I I--\ j •\ I 26 Bell LLC TREES 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 ASPEN I / I TREES I 1 !\ � TO BE REM .I LJL�- I 4.0 F C00 \t, EVERGREEN q� -------`_ \ / o ^ 0 TO DEMO I \\ aJ it - \ / I " STEVEN --- i I _ WILSON �o2t27 COTTONWOOD I i v TO DEMO ASPEN I I TO DEMO CONSULTANTS NEW SURVEYOR EVERGREEN ` I Robert C.Hutton-� / Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane .. -` - NEW I I -- �. Aspen,Coe1611 --1 - (970)544-9952 COTTONWOOD I j--I i I CIVIL r / TBD NEW ASPEN / GEOTECH GRASS \ i �� J. �^� w i i:' TBD WATER LINE OF i wi EXISTING - _` PROPERTY LINE STRUCTURAL mow/ HOUSE TO BE - -- \I ———_ LANDSCAPE I REMOVED , / TBD PLANTERS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR BOULDERS TBD 5/1yp13 DATE Of PUBUI TION LINE OF EXISTING PATIO TO BE - REMOVED 5/9113 BLUFFREVIEW SD MIDIVV INOTFORCONST. -i•?,)( - ,� PROJECT NO 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW \ 1 I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC \fit SHEET TITLE PROPOSED SITE 1/8" 1'-0° R V 1 .4 •4 PROPOSED SITE 15 7 2 4 • l4row 1-3— • Ira• • • • FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P'970.279 4157 F:866.770.5585 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 i I Of �<O GARAGE CORNE I ,\P 014 I 9 STEVEN j * WILSON 402127 ti 1 OF�SFD AaC��v I I j CONSULTANTS I SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton j Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 j (970)544-9952 F — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— F CIVIL j TBD S STORAGE I I El GEOTECH H 0 I HALL I TBD MECHANICAL STORAGE I ots 001 o0z CLOSET I 0a O I GALLERY AREA STRUCTURAL , I 4 BA TBD _. 010 THROOM 01z j t I N _ I m O / ------ I r CO NTRACTOR T.O.CONCRETE SLAB TBD ea BATHROOM \ ooe \ ----- " I I \\ v+Brz01a DR1F ar R,euunor+ L ----- 0021 -- — — — — —— —— — f/ — CLOSET- — — — — — — *AD R O ON 002 011 - - -- -- — - - -j- -BEDROOM- - - - -- -- - -. - --- -.—._— L 01s BEDROOM p j 006 , I \ I i 519/13 BLUFF REVIEW \ 012 SO MIDIYI' NOT FOR CONST. O \ 011 BEDROOM, I �'� i PROJECT NO: 1207 wr \ 014 I 017 DRAWN BY: SMW \ 415 003 01e COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC / 006 / \ / \ 001 005 � \ 007 010 �7 OOB . 009 SHEET 71TL7 1 72'a- __ EXISTING PLANS EXISTING LOWER LEVEL 114" = V-0' EEL 16 15 A 13 12 11 10 c 6 5 3 D 2 1 0 0. • i t - t -6• -- -t I I j i i j i i I I i I I I I I • i i I 1 I i i i I I i i i i I i i I i i I i i I I I I I • i i j i i j i i j i i i I j I i i i i i i i I I i I I i i i j i i j i i j I I i i I I I FORUM PHI I I I I I I I I I I I GARAGE NOT PART OF PHASE 1 ' 117 South Sprang Street,Suite 2 , I I_ P:970.279%C157 F 866.7 0.5585 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A -- I - -I - - ==rt- - - - - - - - - - - - - A 360 LAKE I � I I 26 Bell LLC 1 360 Lake Ave 1 I I I I Aspen,CO 81611 I _ J _ g .029 C — — — — — — — — — ————— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ———— —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I— — — — — —1 — —I— — — — — — — — — — — C rc OF CO, Ff ' y STEVEN I P I m Y * WILSON h I , I O 40 � i 929 I CONSULTANTS E j SURVEYOR YD46'b 045 0/4'. d I Robert C.Hutton I I 7roar Surveyor j 25 Ce tLam l 1 02 T o Aspen, C0816 11 043 1970)544-9952 - - — I — — — CIVIL TBD— — — — — — —— — — — .042 j I .001 035 I TB D OTECH 036 036 037 I I TB C I % E i I I I II I E STRUCTURAL I _— —_— I _— _ I I I TBD I 035 � I m 030 I I 039 I I — I I h CONTRACTOR I I TBD y I -- - - - -- - - - - - - - K F - I 'ow O6t 1 I 032 _ / \ 035 ( \I n i -._ it I I I i\ Q W16M13 Mn OF%I CAIHON I N - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- I - \ -- — — — — — — -- — — — ——i—\ — — —— — —— — — — M 033 519/13 BLUFF REVIEW SO MIDIYY NOT FOR CONST. I I I I 18 PROJECT NO: 1207 I I I I I I DRAWN BY: SMW I I I I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC I I ' 17 IN I I I SHEET TITLE 16 15 a ° 8 D 2 1 Z7.02 G PLANS PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL x•15 -- • i } 72.3• - - - - • -A • I I I I • I I I I I I I • I I I I • FORUM PHI I I I I I 117 South prang Street,Suite 202 As I I I I I P:970.279 457 Colorado 66 7705585 360 LAKE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 26 Bell 1-1-C 360 Lake Ave I I Aspen,CO 81611 I I -�- I 0I 0 I I I I I I I OF Coto T.O.PLYWOOD MAI 99'-11• e 1 * WILSON I 402127 I I I v I I � I I I oF�s�D na°� I I I I I E 0 I I I I CONSULTANTS I I I SURVEYOR I I Robert C.Hutton Professional Land 725 Cemetery Lane Surveyor Aspen,CO 81611 I 723 — 19 6 103 117 8 i (970)544-9952 F,.,_-° - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - L OOD 101'- - - -..�..- ----- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -12D 115- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -— - - - - - - - - - - �-1 F ! CIVIL _ T.O. I �J POW R I 114 1 i22 101 I Eon con ruei9 oFEC I 1 BENCH 707 121 DINING GEOTECH I'ii-- x 103 I TBD UP I 106 x 1 x I 102 I I I ENTRY 101 I STRUCTURAL . MAIN LEL70t TO.PLYWOOD LOBET IANORY I TBD I 107 108 I N f 179 I I m ? I 1 m 1 I ❑ I CONTRACTOR 1 UP ^ I TBD J — - - - - - - - 105 UBPARY PANTR � I \ ,OB T.O.PLYWOOD MAIN LEVEL100' O 105 \ I \ 618/1013 DATEOFPW& TION CHEN 104 \ I O O I \ tab 107 103 x LMN10 AREA OO 102 1 I I 1 519/13 BLUFF REVIEW 108 iii 1 i SD MIDIYY NOT FOR COW ST 112 I I I PROJECT NO: 1207 1 I I DRAWN BY: SMW I I 109 710 1 I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC / I I / \ / 1 I I 17 N SHEET TITLE �`-- - ---- -- -- - -- 550 - -- - - - �- -- Ira• - - - 12 Z7.03 ���JJJ EXISTING PLANS EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 114" = 1'_0• 16 15 A 14 a 8 7 D 2 1 • • .1 xav 6.-. _ 39'7" ' trams ra. • I I I I I � I I I I I I • 1 I I I I I I I I I I I • I I i I j I i I I j I I • FORUM PHI I I I I I I I I 117 Soufh Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 I I i I i I I I I I I i i I I I i I i i 0 I i 360 LAKE I I I I I I I I I I I 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave I I I I I I I I I Aspen,CO 81611 I I I I I I I I I I of 70 __... I 101 0 I I I j APE oq� STEVEN I I I * WILSON —I—— — — — —— ——— — — — — — D 402127 11 Q I - *up I i E F,�,Bep AQO�S y 1 121 I toz 101 I j 104 1 j T I I I I CONSULTANTS I SURVEYOR Robed C.Hutton 1 I i Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane DN ,26' I 1 j Aspen,7081611 120 I I ' 102 I (970)544-9952 F — — — — — —— — — — _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ J — — — — — T03— — — — T— — 1ss r —— — — — — — — —— — — F CIVIL I I ' �LI TBD I LI 0 - rt 3 G 3 I I I I w ti Dr 1 y 1 I g c? I tae I 106 T GEOTECH Y ,1s J H - - - - - -- - -- - -- I I ' I Teo E 118 I I /` 130 I 134 I I o7 --------- STRUCTURAL - ---------- - -- I N µ7 —_.r_—_—_—_— —_—_—_ TBD Q I I 133 I 132 I 16 I I I I CONTRACTOR - - - - - -- - -- - - - I I I I TBD 115 i i I - - - - - - - --- - K 706 &ISM13 DATE OF N191G170N O 106 I 106 104 L - - — — — ——— —— — - - - - - ^ - - - --I- - — U L — 114 - 113 - 1 I y log ' � I r I I i I i 112 \ 519113 BLUFF REVIEW I i I I I SD MIDIYI' NOT FOR CONST. I I j � I I I I I 16 - I PROJECT NO: 1207 177 11Q '� i i DRAWN BY: SMW I I I rF - I I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC i i I 17 N , ' I SHEET TITLE 1.Tvr q. rT g-tx q.$m ,j. 43-4" .1 �\ 7 8 Z7.04 16 15 e � D 2 1 � z �J PLANS PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 1/4" 15 7 2 • -4• • 88'4• --- 1•-O T-3"� • I I I • I I I I j j • I I I • FORUM PHI I I I 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 I I P:970.279.4157«F::866.770.5585 I I I I I I I i 360 LAKE I j 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave I I Aspen,CO 81611 I j I I I j OF C040 A. 0 STEVEN WILSON 402127 U I i I j I CONSULTANTS I SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 (970)544-9952 — ——— — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — TBD S I 212 216 215 I - _ _--__----- __ 221 22o xie WINDOW SEAT 214 218 212 211 -. GEOTECH 21. TEE) I - I -—....-- MASTER DRESSING I kTH STAIRIH MASTER BEDROOM STRUCTURAL y _• zo5 206 z0, 202 I ST Y ml _ - � a I I TBD CONTRACTOR TBD T.O.PLYWOOD 111112 I LAVATORY MASTER STUDY 206 203 I 210 I \ I 5/162013 OAn0F%RUQ7`t0N L — — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — I—— — --- - - - - - - - — 203- - - -- - - - - -I- - I }II- X 202 203 201 208 20 206 206 I I M TO PLYWOOD 110'4• \\ I DECK I / i 519113 BLUFF REVIEW 207 I I SO MIDIYY NOT FOR CONST. I \ I / PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW I •� ���_ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC W \ I � i I � I I 17 I N SHEET TITLE 1J, v'• A' 15 Z Z7.05 EXISTING PLANS EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 1!4" = 1'-0' 16 15 1a B s 7 0 1 • '4• 21 11.,,ar , 101{114' 11-7 ' 36"6i:. 3.-0. 70'.1,.- ' 8._�. • I I I I I I I j I I • I i I � I I I I • i i I i I I i I i FORUM PHI I I j m South Spring Street,Suite 202 P:s7o 279 ai s of ess io.5585 I I j I I I ! I I I ! I II ! I i i I i I I I I 360 LAKE i i i I I II I I I I I I I I I 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave I I I I I I I I Aspen,CO 81611 I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I i OF co,0 O R� STEVEN D — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -�- - - - - - - - - L — — — — — - - - - - - - - � - - - - - - - - - -I- - - - - - - - --- -�- - - - - - - - - - - -! — — - - — — — — — — — D * WILSON�, � QPEN TO i I LOW i i I i , I I I I I I I CONSULTANTS I I ---__ ,- _ I SURVEYOR I I I I Robert C.Hutton I 1 Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane I I I I z28 I I r I Aspen,CO 81611 I I 125_ _ 226 L F H E t r h o Y 4 201 202 1230, I I I I I I I t I I I — A_4 ( (970 )5 44-995 2 1--— — — — — — — — — —— -- — — — — 3— — — — — — — CIVIL _ _ _ _ _ _ TBD DN __ _ _ _ 228D I 224 GEOTECH_ _ - - _ _ _ _ -- _ _ I TBD 231 0 STRUCTURAL TBD -- ___-- 035 OP TO CONTRACTOR - - — — — ——— —— — — —— TBD 207 Ma2013 O A IE OF R6GiON — — — — — — —— — — — — — — ' 1 � 220 — — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — — — — — — — —7 — 8 8 217 215 23 ————— 208 I I I I I 216 214 I 21 270 � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I 6AW13 BLUFF REVIEW I I I I I SO MANYY NOT FOR CONST. I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW i I � I I I I l I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I i i I I I I I I I I ! I I I X-9— n 3• • ,r-r�.- 4•-6- s•��. I SHEET TITLE 31-4. L 9 ' 7 A C Z7.06 16 15 , e � PLANS PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL 1/4• V-0 15 � � • `IT' • I I I • I I I • I I I I I I • I I I • FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 .41 970.27957 F:866 770.5585 I I I I I I i 360 LAKE I I I I 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave I Aspen,CO 81611 I I I I I I OF C000'P I y STEVEN 'b * WILSON 402127 ti I I I I I I I CONSULTANTS I SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton i - - Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 (970)544-9952 F -- — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -— — — — — —— ——— — —— —— — — — — —— — — — —— —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CIVIL TBD I I I I GEOTECH H -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I -- --- -- -- — -- - _ __. _ TBD I I STRUCTURAL D I I I I I I I I I I CONTRACTOR I I I TBD I — — — — — — — — —— — -- �K I I � I I &ISi2013 DAIS d NI CAUON I I � - - — — — — — I I \ \J I I � I I � I 5/9113 BLUFF REVIEW SO MID/YY NOT FOR CONST. I I I I PROJECT NO: 1207 I I DRAWN BY: SMW I I I I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC D17 I I SHEET TITLE I I I 15 b Z Z7.07 EXISTING ROOF EXISTING ROOF 16 15 A 6 T • 2]'-3"• I I I I • I I I I I I • I I I I • FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 I I I I I I P:970.21 Colorado 9.4157 F:866.770.5585 I I I i I I I I i 360 LAKE I I I I 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave I I I I I I Aspen,CO 81611 — — — — — — — — — — — I I I I C — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- — — — — — — — — — - — ——— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — OF cot ON I I I I ter, I h STEVEN I I I I I I * WILSON 102127 v I I I I I I I I I I I I CONSULTANTS I I I I I I I I I SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor I I 725 Cemetery Lane I I I I I Aspen,C081611 (970)5449952 j � I F — — — -- — — — — — — — — — -- y— — — — — — — — r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —I- — — — — — — — — —— — — T —I— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — F CIVIL i I I I - - — — — — — — - - -;- - - - - - 1 TBD - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - a i I j j i I I I I � r? r I I I GEOTECH TBD E STRUCTURAL r' -- -- ---------- ----1 TBD * --- --� --I------------ I I tZ£S3YJ - I CONTRACTOR I I I I TBD - - - -- - ------ - - I I I I I I \ I — — — — — — — — — — — — - - K I I I I I \I 1• 4162013 DAIS OF PUBLIGTION 1 — — —— — — — ———I j \ I I ill I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6013 BLUFF REVIEW I I I i l i I I SO MID/YY NOT FOR CONST. i t i I I I I I i PROJECT NO: 1207 I I I I I I DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC l l I I l l 17 I N I l SHEET TITLE d l 3u l4 I Z7.08 16 15 A � 8 7 1 �CJJ ROOF PLAN ROOF I FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970279.4157 F:866 770 5585 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave ❑ B Aspen,CO 81611 OF CO tiP ____ _____—_______—___—__________ y —_ __—_—_- -—-—-- 8 TEVEN * WILSON 402127 ti U ❑ O�,�SFD A�Ga\,�W ■ ❑ _ CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 (970)544-9952 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 114• = 1•_0^ CIVIL TBD GEOTECH TBD —7 STRUCTURAL -- TBD CONTRACTOR TBD LLLLU i I I LUI SH FLOOR ._._._._._.—._.—._.—I.... __._._ ------.—._---.---------.- ----_.---------------._._._._._._._._ I 5/9113 BLUFFREVIEW FN -- El SO Mi NOT FOR CONST. 9'-0'ABOVE ._._._..._.—.— _ _ _._. _._._. _._ _�.�._�._. ._._._.— _._.__ —.—__— PROJECT NO: 1207 FINISH FLOOR — - DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC --- - PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION Zia° = r-o° SHEET TITLE Z8.01 ELEVATIONS FORUM PHI BO/Z ® 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P-970.279 4157 F.866 770 5585 B 360 LAKE - 26 6e11 LLC 360 Lake Ave — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —-— — — — — — — Aspen,C0 81611 ❑' ®® P4F'OF COtO'D 0J� STEVEN * WILSON X02127 c�NSEO APGa\���i CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,C081611 (970)544-9952 CIVIL TBD GEOTECH TBO EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4' V-0' STRUCTURAL TBO CONTRACTOR TBD - Yt6�]013 WIEOFPOBL 71011 I i 1 j j 5013 BLUFF REVIEW _ SO I MIDM'INOTFORCONST. PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI LLC SHEET TITLE Z8.02 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" ELEVATIONS FORUM PHI 117 South spring Street,Suite 202 r 0 E 360 Aspen.COLA 8 F0 F-1 FE-11FE-10 P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 LAKE E \\ 26 Bell LLC — — — — — — — -— — — —-— — — — — — — \ 360 Lake Ave -- - - - - ----- - ---- — ------ Aspen,CO 81611 P�0 OF C04O� 0 STEVEN - * WILSON 4021" V —-—-—-—----—-— -—-—-—-—-— -—-—-—-—----—-—-—-—-—L -—-—-—-—-—-— c��SFD AaG�� CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor 171 F 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 (970)544-9952 CIVIL TBD GEOTECH EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 114" = V-0" TBD — _ STRUCTURAL TBD CONTRACTOR TBD NIGM13 wleaPLII UM ',� __ - i Eff-ElEff IEH I 519113 BLUFF REVIEW ..{{I SD I MIDIYY NOT FOR CONST. PROJECT NO: 1207 ---- DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE Z8.03 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 114" - 1 0 ELEVATIONS FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279 4157 F:886170.5585 ----- - -------- ----------- -- --- 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 OF C04O'P tiP �b y S7EVEN ------ * WILSON 402127 ti — — — — — — — — cllk CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = V-0" (970)544-9952 CIVIL TBD GEOTECH TBD STRUCTURAL TBD CONTRACTOR TBD 1111 FBI I _.�_'__ __ v�sama DATE of vueuunory 5/9113 BLUFF REVIEW SD M/DIYV NOT FOR CONST. PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC SHEET TITLE 28.04 ELEVATIONS PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 114 - 1'-U" FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 \ _ 360 LAKE \ \ °R�o 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave OyrpQ�FF Aspen,CO 81611 qo`e<tr F cot STEVEN WILSON \ c+ CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert Professional el Lan Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 - _ \ I (970)544-9952 CIVIL \ \ GEOTECH TBD i I �I. STRUCTURAL TBD \ -j tr \ CONTRACTOR \ J TBD 91an013 DRTEOFF SLICATION ` AREA TO BE RESTORED AND REVEGATATED - - -- __ L LINE OF EXISTING 5/9/13 BLUFF REVIEW TOPOGRAPHY SO M/D/YY NOT FOR CONST. PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC SHEET TITLE Z9.01 A PROPOSED SECTION SECTION S 1/4" - 1'-0" FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 \v Aspen,Colorado P:970.279.4157 F.8666 770.770.5585 O,\o�l0 360 LAKE A 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 0 C04 � r Ir r Il; �- y STEVEN WILSON o CONSULTANTS r' 1 SURVEYOR Robert H Lan - `'- Pro C d Surveyor - —,� �/ 7 Cemetery Lane o Aspen,CO 81611 _��,�,_ `: _ _ - I u C - J ✓'� ''�.�� (970)544-9952 - CIVIL TBD GEOTECH I' '1y r. f� T 1 BD r; r C C l _ STDRUCTURAL TS FBI I 1. 1. CONTRACTOR ( T D ``\ . ... AREA TO BE RESTORED AND REVEGATATED - `- L i El ' '• p 519113 BLUFF REVIEW [LINE --OF EXISTING _ -.. _ / SD MID/YY NOT FOR CONST. TOPOGRAPHY _ _ __ X PROJECT NO: 1207 - ----.. -- - - DRAWN BY. SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC F' SHEET TITLE Z9.02 B PROPOSED SECTION 1l4" 1'0" SECTION S = [REA P RTH N.EAST S.EAST AL IMPROVEMENT PRECENTAGE ING WALL L.`- 254.50 89.75 37.50 164.7 317.50 EXCEDING THE 293.75 1.25 122.2 64.75 7398.75 sf. �\ F LINE ANGLE 7.00 8.75 NONCONFORMING 1398.75 sf • HT LIMIT 27.75 WALLS -878.5 sf 8.75 520.25 sf \� ES D WALL 221. 18.7 163.00 115.25 9.50 IMPROVEMENT IN ❑ zs3 is sa n FLINE ANG THE 15.00 30.25 878.5 NONCONFORMING FORUM PHI F LINE ANGLE 3.75 3.50 NONCONFORMING WALL AREA EIGHT LIMIT 132.25 1.5 WALLS 520.25 sf.=37.2% 117 South Spnn9 Street,Suite 202 P: 0 Aspen,157Colorado 81611 970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 �9own SEE NE 360 LAKE 9815snn 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave B2.1 B2.1 SEE SE SEE SE Aspen,CO 81611 SOUTH NORTH S E E 82.2 B2.2 F co S.EAST N.EAST O < B2.1 EAST STEVEN II- * WILSON LEGEND - 494727 ti SEE NE u SEE SE SEE SE cFtiS�n AaG�\�� SEE NE I CONSULTANTS Robert C.Hutton Professional,Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane __ --___.--_ I ' - - _-__ly._�__I1_L__ - _ --- - - _ Aspen.C081611 (970)544-9952 EXISTING EAST 1/4" = V-0" CIVIL TBD I I GEOTECH I I TBD I I I _ I I ( - 3 i STRUCTURAL 750,y n I I � izswn I ❑ CONTRACTOR 2]]s n I 8.759t♦11 I TBD SEEN sg I j SEE SE I I - I I _ � snerzoia AreoFwauurroa SEE NE erp I - -- e.�s sqn I I I � z asosgn - - _ 519113 BLUFF REVIEW I I SD MIDM' NOT FOR CONST. I I I j SEE SE SEE SE PROJECT NO: 1207 F-_ _ -' I DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC EXISTING SOUTH 114" = 14-0" EXISTING NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET TITLE B 2. 1 BLUFF REVIEW ALL EXPOSURE SOUTH S.EA IMPROVEMENT PRECENTAGE • (STING WALL 254.50 89.75 37.50 164.75 317.50 REA EXCEDING THE 293.75 1.261 122.25 64.75 1398.75 at LUFF LINE ANGLE 7.001 8.751 NONCONFORMING 1398.75 sf • EIGHT LIMIT 1 27.751 WALLS -878.5 sf 75 52025 sf 0.50 • ROPOSE W 221.7 182.75 610 115.26 97 IMPROVEMENT IN • LREA EXCEDING THE 1500 30.25 878.5 NONCONFORMING LINE ANGLE 3.75 3.50 NONCONFORMING WALL AREA T LIMIT 132.25 1.51 WALLS 520.25 sf.=37.2% FORUM 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen.Colorado 81611 P:970.279 4157 F:866170.5585 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave B2.1 -3 B2.1 Aspen,CO 81611 SOUTH NORTH B2.2 132.2 S.EAST N.EAST os<, Of 004 B2.1 EAST STEVEN 'I * WILSON LEGEND - _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ 402127 ti i U I 0��3F0 APG��C�' T _ .I I I CONSULTANTS it SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton -- - - - - - - ---- - Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lam -L__i__.I. __ _-11 Aspen,CO 81611 (970)544-9952 - - - CIVIL - - Tao EXISTING NORTH EAST 1/4" = V-0" SEOTECH TED I STRUCTURAL TBD I I I CONTRACTOR j TED I I I \ WlaQU13 DATE OF PUBLICATION I I I I I jti+.i5 54 M I I 519113 BLUFF REVIEW I SD MIDIYY NOT FOR CONST. I I PROJECT NO: 1207 I DRAWN BV: SMW _ I COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC 311.50 s�11 I - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - _ -- - I_ - - - - - - - - - - - - _. _. _ _ _. _ _ - __ - - - SHEET TITLE EXISTING SOUTH EAST 1/4' = 1'-0" 6 2.2 BLUFF REVIEW Pill NALL EXPOSURE SOUTH FAST INORTH N.EAT IS.EAST TOTALS IMPROVEMEM PRECENTAGE. • EXISTING WALL 254.50 89.75 37.50 164.75 317.50 REA EXCEDING THE 293.75 1.25 122.25 64.75 1398.75 at 132.3 LUFF LINE ANGLE 7.00 8.75 NONCONFORMING 1398.75 sf 62.3 F- • EIGHT LIMIT 27.75 WALLS -878.5 sf SOUTH NORTH 81 5 52025 9f 0.50 • ROPOSED WALL 2 1. 18. 163.00 11515 9. IMPROVEMENT IN ��11 REA EXCEDING THE 15.00 30.25 878.5 NONCONFORMING 62.3 EAST B2.3 • LUFF LINE ANGLE 3.75 3.50 NONCONFORMING WALL AREA N.EAST FORUM PHI EIGHT LIMIT 132.25 1.5 WALLS 520.25 sf.=37.2% B2.3 S.EAST 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 LEGEND Aspen,Colorado 81611 P-.970.279 4157 F.866.770.5585 360 LAKE san 26 Bell I 360 60 Ave Lake Av Aspen,CO 81611 9R Lz' OF C4�0'P g STEVEN I I I- I --f 7 WILSON� ti 6 I I I I I� SFD pRG j 1627s s4 R I I I I I I I I 132 26 aq R CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR R I C.Hutton o 115.25 w n -; r SEE SE SEE NE Professonal Land Surveyor I 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,--0 81611 (970)544-9952 CIVIL - - - - TBD I I I I I I I I I OTECH BD I I III I � I I I - L - PROPOSED NORTH EAST 1/4" = 1•-0" PROPOSED EAST 1/4" = V-0" STRUCTURAL TBD CONTRACTOR TBD I - - &161 MMMPUllUCATION I I I 163.00 s4R I I I US 5/9/13 BLUFF REVIEW SO MIDI NOT FOR CONST. I I I PROJECT NO 1207 I 2 768gR I I DRAWN BY: SMW -- _ -- I - - - - - - - - - SEE NE COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC i a I � I I � II I I SHEET TITLE 6 2.3 PROPOSED SOUTH 1/4" = V-0" PROPOSED SOUTH EAST 1/4" V-0•' PROPOSED NORTH 14" = V-0" BLUFF REVIEW y . FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Sheet,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave Aspen,CO 81611 OF C04OR y STEVEN * WILSON 402127 U C1F4'SFO AQG�\,�4i CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lane Aspen,CO 81611 .(970)544-9952 CIVIL -- �/ TBD G � L GEOTECH TBD H STRUCTURAL TBD Q CONTRACTOR TBD 5'16=13 DATE0f GO5J=0N F , A 11.50 A 71.50 B 419.25 B 55.25 519113 BLUFF REVIEW . C 126.50 C 94.00 SD MID/YY NOT FOR CONST. 71.50 sgM1 5526 sgfl 94.00 sgfl 85.50 pfl 88.25 sgfl 15.50 sgfl 411.50 agfl 1925 sgfl D 67.75 D 65.50 E 184.75 E 68.25 F 49.25 F 15.50 PROJECT NO: 1207 11.50sg1 419.25 It 126.50 sgIt 87.75 sgM1 184.75 sqn 49-255gn 28.25 sgIt G 28.25 G 48.50 DRAWN BY: SMW H 79.00 H 1925. J 127.75 J 165.00 COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC K 28.25 K 147.75 L 34.50 L 109.50 M 1.50 M 0.00 A" 4r ��F7 1178.25 TOTAL 860.00 165.00 sq It 147 75 sq M1 109.50 sq It 7900sgM1 127.75sgr1 20.25sgfl 34.50sgfl 1 Soso n 318.25%IMPROVED 27011 SHEET TITLE EXISTING NONCONFORMING ROOF AREA PLAN 1/8" = V-0" PROPOSED NONCONFORMING ROOF AREA PLAN 1/8" = V-0" B 3. 1 BLUFF REVIEW FORUM PHI i' 117 South Spring Colorado Street,Suite 202 - Aspen,Colorado 6.7 71 � P:970.2794157 F:866.770.5585 i 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave Aspen. CO 81611 s -• - r _y .�- _� - �• - �-._.� - -_ STEVEN --° -` _✓ .-> i .- * WILSON 402727 ti ✓ ✓� _ _ _ VIEW LEGEND VIEW LEGEND %ti`QED ARCS` . ; CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton Professional Land Surveyor 725 Ce—tery Lane / w Aspen,CO 81611 2 (970)544.9952 7 6 5 4 3 7 6 5 4 3 CIVIL i TBD EXISTING VIEW 1 PROPOSED VIEW 1 GEOTECH TBD STRUCTURAL TBD I CONTRACTOR TBD &16/1013 DAreot PUBUaUDN K F�� � - - __ 5/9113 BLUFF REVIEW ` - zli -y - ` _y - - SD MIWYY NOT FOR CONST. a! VIEW LEGEND PROJECT NO: 1207 _ F-� I - DRAWN BY: SMW a COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC l `d 7 6 4 3 6 4 3 SHEET TITLE EXISTING VIEW 2 PROPOSED VIEW 2 B 4. 1 BLUFF REVIEW FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P'.970.279.4157 F.866.770.5585 360 LAKE - - _ 26 Bell LLC As Pen ,CO81611 c- OF C040 F _ a "— STEVEN WILSON 402127 u =T y VIEV�1 LEGEND VIEW LEGEND clkl (o IT ' J _ A i CONSULTANTS C N ULTANTS ` 1 _ SURVEYOR TNI - ,� Robert C.Hutton 725 ctery La Surveyor n eme $ '\ 2 (970)544-9962 2 ✓._ y'- � Z3 III 111 6 5 4 3 6 5 4 3 CIVIL TBD EXISTING VIEW 3 PROPOSED VIEW 3 GEOTECH TBD STRUCTURAL TBD CONTRACTOR TBD v1arz013 ogre of vueuanoN W13 BLUFF REVIEW _ - _ _ _ _ _ - ' J •y ` .� - _ - - - SD MIDIYY NOT FOR CONST. _ j — PROJECT NO. 1207 _ VIEW LEGEND - - DRAWN BY: SMW r =� COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC " r � I 7 6 5 4 3 7 6 5 4 3 SHEET TITLE EXISTING VIEW 4 --PROPOSED VIEW 4 B 4.2 BLUFF REVIEW I EL _- - - - FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street.Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970279.4157 F'.866 770.5585 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave - Aspen.CO 81611 It Of C040 l- 00 STEVEN WILSON ri VIEW LEGEND �sFD AaG CONSULTANTS --' a � -- — SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton professional Land Surveyor 725 Cemetery Lana Aen.C 995211 IN. - � 3 CIVIL 6 4 TBD — 5 a 8 a 7 3 /� 6 5 �- - PROPOSED VIEW GEOTECH — TBD - EXISTING VIEW 7 STRUCTURAL -_----- TBD CONTRACTOR TBD 916W13 DATEOI`UWJGTtON l 01 - =--- _- - - - 519113 BLUFF REVIEW -' '_-�-b- --_ - - -�•-v" _ _ _' - SD MIDIYY NOT FOR CONST. PROJECT NO: 1207 DRAWN BY: SMW IEW LEGEND 8 3 2 SHEET TITLE _ 4 1 6 5 a �, _ 2 ----- --- B 4.4 6 5 4 3 vROPOSE�wFnr B BLUFF REVIEW - '- --- EXISTING VIEW S • FORUM PHI 117 South Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen.Colorado 81611 P.970.2794157 F.866.770.5585 360 LAKE 26 Bell LLC 360 Lake Ave 51-V®R -- _ Aspen,CO 81611 of 004 STEVEN WILSON 402127 ti VIEW LEGEND'=- CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Robert C.Hutton ly 25 Cemetery Laneurveyor Aspen,CO 81611 yj �" g T \ Z 8 r T • 2 (970)544-9952 Y 6 15 4 -- 6 l5 4 BIDIL 1 EXISTING VIEW 3 PROPOSED VIEW 3 GEOTECH TBD STRUCTURAL TBO I I CONTRACTOR TBD OL SI1efI MWOFN•IIUTION q- 1 519113 IBLUFFREVIEW SD I MID/Y`7 INOTFORCONST. PROJECT O• 1287 _ VIEW LEGEND DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC 7. J r 7 6 4 3 7 6 4 3 SHEET TITLE EXISTING VIEW 4 PROPOSED VIEW 4 B 4.2 BLUFF REVIEW AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: -34�0 /a. pytQ , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: tl Ilta 6, lf-:doom , 20a STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) Z, (name, please print) i being or representing an Applicant to the City,of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally 1 certify that T have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: V Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice.: By posting of notice,which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the—day of , 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sio) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) s Rezoning or text amendment: 'Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision Of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other - sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However,the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this -23-day Of 4 201,3, by �rA S P=fMay TICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL BLUFF REVIEWALLAM LAKE RE: 36o NOTICE IS HE t a public hearing will be held on- , ,2013,at a spe- - My COmm1SS1On expires: - cial meeting to begin at 4.30 p.m.before the As. pen Planning and Zoning Commission,Council Chambers,Cdy Hall,130 5 Galena Si.,Aspen,to consider an application submitted by Bell 26 LLC, RlJ[.�V I �L1!�' P.O.Box 1860,Bentonville,AR 72712,represent- mo Aspen SCO Bty611 Wilson, subject property stl 2a1� eg �- described as 360 Lake Avenue,Lot 1 of the Er Notary Public man Partnership Lot Split,City and Townsite of Aspen,Parcel ID#2735-121-32-001.The apP, cant requests Hallam Lake Bluff Review to relo- cate some existin ,rgare footage and restore part ntact Sara of lh�bluff. City o hAspen Community Develop- % nt,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,CO, rt 22 __"o dams�cityofaspen.com. f El#ar "°eou ZpZ lj.fe'o 400&164, ' .. X00 b34N�v '0�l ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: S9R Co T • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 360 Lake Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 ,Aspen,CO ,�D REr . SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 14 ,20 13 1 2013 STATE OF COLORADO ) G► OF ASPEN ss. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT County of Pitkin ) 1, Steev Wilson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. ✓/Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15)days prior to the public hearing on the 14 day of May , 20 13, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) • • Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested,to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30)days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature 'J The foregoin , "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this / day of M y 20 , by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My =res: /�Z� 'Z d/5 TODD A LAY NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO Notary Public NOTARY ID 19994002103 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 2S,2015 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: •COPY OF THE PUBLICATION •PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. X24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE Date : May 14 , 2013 Time : 4 : 30pm Place : Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall , 130 S . Galena St Purpose : The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to conduct Hallam Lake Bluff review to relocate some existing square footage and to reconstruct a portion of the bluff. The applicant is Bell 26 LLC represented by Steev Wilson , 117 S . Spring St For further information contact Aspen Planning Dept. at 970-920-5090 or email sara . adamsRcityofaspen . com 320 ASPEN LLC 335 LAKE AVE LLC AML INVESTMENT II LLC 2950 E BROAD ST 715 W MAIN ST#101 430 PARKSON RD COLUMBUS, OH 43209 ASPEN, CO 81611 HENDERSON, NV 89015 ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL BART QUAL PER RES TRST BELL 26 LLC STUDIES 909 POYDRAS ST 20TH FL PO BOX 1860 100 PUPPY SMITH ST NEW ORLEANS, LA 70112 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERGER BRUCE C 2011 QPRT#1 50% CHATFIELD CROSSINGS INC E A ALTEMUS PARTNERSHIP LLLP BERGER BARBARA 2011 QPRT#1 50% C/O DWORMAN DARRYL PO BOX 5000 600 E HOPKINS AVE#202 65 W 55TH ST STE 4A ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10019 ASPEN, CO 81612 EFH HOLDINGS LP FAUQUET LLC GILLESPIE LLC PO BOX 8770 1033 SKOKIE BLVD#605 191 N WACKER DR#1800 ASPEN, CO 81612 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 CHICAGO, IL 60606 HUNT ELLEN 12.8066% LEYDECKER SUZANNE LYNNE LUBAR SHELDON B& MARIANNE S PO BOX 8770 710 N THIRD ST UNIT A 700 N WATER ST#1200 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4206 MUSTANG HOLDINGS LLC OAK LODGE LLC 87.1934% RANDALL EDWARD 111 50% 715 W MAIN ST#201 C/O WILLIAM O HUNT FIVE POST OAK PARK#2580 ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 7951 4400 POST OAK PKWY ASPEN, CO 81612 HOUSTON, TX 77027 RANDALL ELLEN MIDDLETON TRUST RIVERSIDE AVENUE LLC WALNUT CREEK RANCH LLC 50% 410 LAKE AVE 4520 MAIN ST STE 1060 600 JEFFERSON STE#350 ASPEN, CO 81611 KANSAS CITY, MO 64111-1816 HOUSTON, TX 77002 WESNER BLAINE F&ALEXA WOOD DUCK REALTY CORP ZILKHA SELIM K TRUST 900 LIVE OAK CIR 645 FIFTH AVE 8TH FL 750 LAUSANNE RD AUSTIN,TX 78746 NEW YORK, NY 10022 LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 360 LAKE AVENUE—HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 14, 2013, at a special meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Bell 26 LLC, P.O. Box 1860, Bentonville,AR 72712,represented by Steev Wilson, 117 S. Spring St., Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611. The subject property is legally described as 360 Lake Avenue, Lot 1 of the Erdman Partnership Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Parcel ID#2735-121-32-001. The applicant requests Hallam Lake Bluff Review to relocate some existing square footage and restore part of the bluff. For further information, contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2778, sara.adams @cityofaspen.com. s/LJ Erspamer,Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 25,2013 City of Aspen Account re E mm 4a3� l ref »:d ed rN k�3 A; l $'r e b " W a ys 3 � r { 4 a.' a u w . IL lik Ja A q a �, 1• n.�. a.4' �'. '�a +" x °`�; . rt , as t ° 's r x, ray; v w �. A AV } i h ,y a s MEMORANDUM IkA TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission • FROM: Sara Adams, Senior Planner THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director RE: 360 Lake Avenue—Hallam Lake Bluff Review Resolution No._, Series of 2013 MEETING DATE: May 21, 2013 APPLICANT/OWNER: "Bell 26, LLC, REPRESENTATIVE: Steev Wilson of Forum Phi Inc. LOCATION: 360 Lake Avenue CURRENT ZONING: R6 (Medium Density Residential) SUMMARY: The Applicant requests Hallam Bluff Review to remodel and expand the existing building and to reconstruct a Photo: Map of 360 Lake Avenue. The star indicates portion of the bluff. the subject property and the blue hatching shows the protected Hallam Bluff area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with conditions. REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals to remodel and expand the existing building: • A Hallam Lake Bluff Review (Chapter 26.435.060, Hallam Lake Bluff Review) for development within the bluff area. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority.) BACKGROUND: The existing house was constructed in early 1990, a few months before Hallam Lake Bluff review was adopted into the Land Use Code (November, 1990). A large portion of the natural Page 1 of 4 360 Lake Avenue Hallam Lake Bluff Review P&Z Memo 5.21.2013 ® - o slope was removed during construction to make room for the house, which sits within the landscape. The purpose of Hallam Lake Bluff Review is to protect the ecological, environmental and scenic significance of Hallam Lake through a heighted review process for new development. Development within the Hallam Lake Bluff review area is subject to a more stringent review to reduce noise and visual impacts on the nature preserve, protect against slope erosion and landslide, minimize impacts on surface runoff, maintain views to and from the nature preserve and ensure the aesthetic and historical integrity of Hallam Lake and the nature preserve. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The current configuration does not meet the Hallam Lake Bluff review criteria. The applicant proposes to improve the non-conforming structure to better meet the criteria by reconstructing a portion of the slope that was removed and relocating some of the square footage that infringes on the Hallam Bluff setbacks and height limit to the front of the home. The applicant also proposes to land a transferrable development right (TDR) to increase the maximum floor area by 250 square feet, which requires approval by City Council. The Parks and Engineering Departments have been working closely with the applicant to determine an appropriate location and method to restore a portion of the bluff(see Exhibit B for comments). The existing trees are proposed to be retained and protected during the bluff reconstruction. A basic landscape plan and a lighting plan are included in the application. The images below show the existing top of slope(pink flags) and the proposed top of slope(at the top of the white stakes). Page 2 of 4 360 Lake Avenue Hallam Lake Bluff Review P&Z Memo 5.21.2013 �t A _ Proposed Proposed ,y to p of = top of 4 slope ,z l .n4S Existing Existing top of top of slope slope STAFF COMMENTS' V Staff is supportive of the proposal to bring the property into closer conformance with the Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. Considering the scope of the remodel project and the current configuration of the residence, Staff finds that the intent of the review standards is met with the application. The review criteria are addressed in Exhibit A. Numerous conditions are included in the draft resolution related to the reconstruction of the bluff and the re-vegetation of the area to ensure that the project is successful and preserves the existing natural vegetation and slope. The Parks and Engineering Departments will attend the site visit at noon on May 21 st and will also attend the public hearing to answer any technical questions about the project. Engineering is concerned about the severity of the reconstructed slope and whether the proposed slope is able to meet Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) requirements. The proposed reconstruction is about a 60 degree slope and the Engineering Department has determined that an 18 degree slope is the maximum slope that will meet URMP requirements. This determination was made on May 16, 2013, which did not leave much time for Engineering and the applicant to work out the technical aspects of the project. Page 3 of 4 360 Lake Avenue Hallam Lake Bluff Review P&Z Memo 5.21.2013 C REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS: The City Engineer and Parks Department have reviewed the proposed application. Their comments are attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in the draft Resolution where appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval with conditions. As mentioned above, the Engineering Department does not find that a 60 degree slope is able to meet URMP requirements. Staff has included a condition of approval that the slope is verified in the field by the Engineering and Parks Departments. If the slope changes substantially, which in turn changes the impact of the proposal on the Hallam Lake Bluff, the project will require a Substantial amendment by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Proposed Motion: "I move to approve Resolution #_, Series of 2013, approving with conditions Hallam Lake Bluff Review for the project located at 360 Lake Avenue. Attachments: Exhibit A—Hallam Lake Bluff Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit B— Parks and Engineering Departments Comments Exhibit C - Application Page 4 of 4 360 Lake Avenue Hallam Lake Bluff Review P&Z Memo 5.21.2013 RESOLUTION N0. (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 360 LAKE AVENUE, LOT 1 OF THE ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID:2 73 7-182-24-008 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Bell 26, LLC, represented by Steev Wilson of Forum Phi, Inc. requesting approval of Hallam Lake Bluff Review to remodel the existing residence; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for Hallam Lake Bluff Review; and, WHEREAS,the property is zoned Medium Density Residential (R-6); and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on May 14, 2013, continued to May 21, 2013, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. , Series of 2013,by a vote, approving Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety,and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO THAT: Resolution No_, Series 2013 Page 1 of 4 C; Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Hallam Lake Bluff Review with conditions, as shown in Exhibit A. Section 2: Hallam Bluff Reconstruction A site plan detailing areas of impact on Hallam Bluff, specifically the location of excavation, depth of excavation, type of machinery, storage of materials, location of utility connections and other items shall be submitted with the building permit. Parks shall approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit approval process. Hallam Bluff Stabilization: Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for protection of the Hallam Lake Bluff. The detailed plan shall identify the location of erosion control measures. The project is subject to Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP) standards. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for construction staging. This plan shall detail how the construction will take place with staging, storage of materials and locations of vehicles so that any trees remaining on site will not be impacted and to prevent unnecessary impacts to the Hallam Lake Bluff. The Parks and Engineering Department shall approve the final slope stabilization plan. The work should be designed and completed by a company that has experience in this specific line of work. The company of choice shall provide examples and an understanding of the history working with this type of stabilization. Site Protection: The applicant should detail how the existing structure and other improvements will be accessed, removed and restored without creating additional impacts to the undisturbed portions of the property along the Bluff. Section 3: Parks Department: Re-vegetation/Restoration: Parks requires approval of a full re-vegetation or restoration plan that should include seed mix, plant species, irrigation and a noxious weed control plan. Approval of the landscape plan and building permit is contingent on an approved re-vegetation plan. Noxious Weed: The contractor shall be responsible for the control of noxious weeds during a one year warranty period. The City of Aspen shall perform monthly inspections of the area during construction. Inspection of materials: The contractor will be required to provide a fax, hand deliver or participate in a on-site inspection of the specifications for the seed mix, certified weed free straw and top soil. Resolution No_,Series 2013 Page 2 of 4 C 0 Irrigation: Restoration areas require supplemental above ground irrigation system. Irrigation shall be installed in a manner that provides full coverage of the disturbed area for a period of two years. Section 4: Engineering Slope Reconstruction: The slope reconstruction is subject to Engineering and Parks Departments approval. The location and degree of the slope shall be verified in the field. Significant changes to the slope shall require a substantial amendment by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. Section 5• The proposed project is subject to a floor area amendment to the Erdman Partnership Lot Split by Aspen City Council. Section 6• All material,representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 7: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 8• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 21s` day of May, 2013. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Debbie Quinn,Asst. City Attorney U Erspamer, Chair ATTEST: Resolution No_, Series 2013 Page 3 of 4 Jackie Lothian,Deputy City Clerk Resolution No_,Series 2013 Page 4 of 4 C 0 Exhibit A—Hallam Lake Bluff Review Standards 26.435.060.C. Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. No development shall be permitted within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development meets all of the following requirements: 1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. Staff Response: The top of slope currently goes through the house as shown below in green. The actual top of slope is located along the tree line closer to Hallam Lake as roughly shown below in red. The house was constructed in early 1990 before the Hallam Lake Bluff review was required. A large portion of the natural slope was removed during construction to make room for the house, which sits within the landscape. The current configuration does not meet the Hallam Lake Bluff review criteria. The applicant proposes to improve the non-conforming structure to better meet the criteria by reconstructing the portion of the slope that was removed and relocating some of the square footage with the required setbacks and height limits to the front of the home. Reconstructing the bluff involves extensive soil stabilization and revegetation to ensure that the newly created bluff does not damage the existing natural bluff below. Conditions of approval are included in the draft resolution that requires Parks and Engineering approval of various aspects of the design of the reconstruction and a contractor experienced in slope construction and stabilization to complete the work. The review criterion is geared toward new construction and not a remodel. Staff finds that the proposal to improve the existing non-conformity by reconstructing the bluff and removing non- conformity floor area from the Hallam Lake setbacks is appropriate and meets the intent of the review criterion to preserve the natural environment. 2. All development within the fifteen-foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the fifteen-foot setback shall not be approved unless the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the following conditions can be met: a. A unique condition exists on the site where strict adherence to the top-of-slope setback will create an unworkable design problem. b. Any intrusion into the top-of-slope setback or height limit is minimized to the greatest extent possible. c. Other parts of the structure or development on the site are located outside the top-of-slope setback line or height limit to the greatest extent possible. d. Landscape treatment is increased to screen the structure or development in the setback from all adjoining properties. Staff Response: About 2,577 square feet of the existing building sits within the 15 foot setback and the applicant proposes to remove most of the non-conformity; however a portion of the building is proposed to remain within the setback. In addition, the applicant proposes a large area of hardscape within the 15 foot setback. The proposed intrusions into the top of slope are minimized considering the applicant is working with an existing building and decreasing the non-conformity. The applicant does not propose any additional onsite screening beyond the existing trees and vegetation, all of which are proposed to be retained and protected during construction of the bluff and remodel. Staff is supportive of the applicant's effort to decrease the existing non-conformity and finds that, considering the scope of the remodel project, the review criteria above are met. 3. All development outside the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five-degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community - Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.104.100 and the method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020. Staff Response: The applicant proposes to reduce the amount of intrusions into the 45 degree angle; however the remodeled building still infringes on the height limit. As mentioned above, the applicant is working with an existing building that does not meet the current Hallam Lake Bluff requirements. The applicant proposes to decrease the non-conformity but not completely bring the building into conformance with the review standards. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty percent (50%) of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. Staff Response: The applicant proposes to maintain the existing trees and vegetative screening, which adequately screens the existing house. The images below are taken from the property looking toward Red Mountain(left photo) and looking toward Hallam Lake(right photo). 3# qT lyd it 1y f! µ C ,v S A condition of approval to re-vegetate the reconstructed bluff according to the Parks Department's specifications is included in the draft resolution. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150.6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. Staff Response: The proposed lighting plan meets the review criterion. All of the lights comply with the lighting code and do not shine toward the nature preserve. © 0 6. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope and pertinent elevations above sea level. Staff Response: The applicant has met this condition. Memorandum Date: April 29, 2013 To: Sara Adams, City of Aspen Planning From: Brian Flynn, Parks Department Re: 360 Lake Ave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A Site plan: 1) The City will need a site plan that shows or identifies the areas of impact on the Hallam Lake Bluff-where will excavation take place, how deep,type of machinery, storage of materials,what utility, etc..... ,B) Tree Protection: 1) A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines.A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. It is recommended that this protection fence be placed along the extent of impact on the Hallam Bluff. 2) No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. As referenced in Chapter 13.20 3) Any access across or through the area of protection is prohibited at all times C) Utility Connections: 1) How and where utility connections are made is a major concern relative to impact on the existing trees and areas of protection. D) Tree Permit: If a tree(s) is requested for removal, the applicant will be required to receive an approved tree removal permit per City Code 13.20,this includes impacts under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior to approval of the demo and/or building permits. If a permit is necessary, contact the City Forester at 920-5120. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or on site per City Code 13.20. Parks will approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. E) Hallam Bluff Stabilization: Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for protection of the Hallam Lake Bluff. The detailed plan shall identify the location of silt fencing. Minimum requirements include a silt fence and possibly straw bales placed in a manner preventing erosion protecting the Hallam Lake Bluff from residual run-off. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for Construction staging. This plan shall detail how the construction will take place with staging, storage of materials and locations of vehicles so that trees remaining on site will not be impacted and remain protected. As required by Ordinance 26.440.060 The Parks and Engineering Department will have to approve the final slope stabilization plan. The work should be designed and completed by a company or companies that have experience in this specific line of work, providing examples and an understanding of the history working with this type of stabilization. F) Access: The applicant should detail how the existing structure and other improvements will be accessed, removed and restored without creating additional impacts to the undisturbed portions of the property along the Bluff. G) Re-vegetation/Restoration: Parks requires approval of a full re-vegetation or restoration plan that should include seed mix, plant species, irrigation and a noxious weed control plan. Approval of a landscape permit is contingent on an approved re-vegetation plan. The following specifications will help in the design and plan for restoration of the site: City of Aspen Restoration Specifications A. The contractor is required to restore the disturbed area to City of Aspen standards. A plan will be required for review and approval and shall include, but not be limited to; seed mixes and amounts, plant materials and amounts, proper plans for installation, seeding and irrigation. The Parks Department is available to meet with the contractor prior to submitting a design. B. At the completion of the work,the Parks Department,will meet on site to inspect and sign off on the finished work and give approval for completion of the restoration. All areas of disturbance shall be restored to the following standards: Top Soil: All disturbed areas shall be restored with a minimum of eight (8) inches of topsoil. Top soil shall be sifted and free of structural materials. Top soil should be integrated into the disturbed area in order to match existing grades. Parks Department Staff will need to inspect soil quality and depth. Seeding Procedure: Hand broadcast in areas of disturbance (phase one of seeding is complete coverage of area, phase two is distributing seed at a 90 degree angle to the phase one distribution) 1. Rake seed into soil 2. Hand broadcast Bio-sol fertilizer 3. Cover area with certified weed free straw 4. Tackify area of disturbance (stabilize straw) Restoration Seed Mix: • Indian Rice Grass 'Nez Par' -Achnatherum hymenoides 'Nez Par' 3.0 lbs/acre • Sideoats Grama- Bouteloua curtipedula 'Pierre' 4.0 lbs/acre • Sandberg Bluegrass - Poa secunda 'Sherman' 0.5 lbs/acre • Thickspike Wheat Grass- Elymus lanceolatus 2 lbs/acre • 'San Luis'Slender Wheatgrass - Elymus trachycalulus 31bs/acre • 'Garnet' Mountain Brome- Bromus marginatus 'Garnet' 3 lbs/acre • Arizona Fescue- Festuca ovina'Arriba' 2.51bs/acre • 'Arriba'Western Wheatgrass- Pascopyrum smithii 'Arriba' 2.5 lbs/acre • Hairy Golden Aster- Chrysopsis villosa 0.251bs/acre • Lanceleaf Coreopsis- Coreopsis lanceolata 0.5 lbs/acre • Silver Lupine- Lupinus argenteus 1.0 lb/acre • Blue Flax- Linum lewisii 1.0 lb/acre • Rocky Mountain Penstemon Penstemon strictus 2.0 lbs/acre • Siberian wallflower 0.15 lbs/acre • Sweet William Pinks 0.15 lbs/acre • Perennial Gaillardia 0.35 lbs/acre • Annual Baby's breath 0.10 lbs/acre • Cornflower 0.15 lbs/acre • Shasta Daisy 0.25 lbs/acre • California Poppy 0.15 lbs/acre • Corn Poppy 0.10 lbs/acre • Purple Coneflower 0.151bs/acre .• Firecracker penstemon- Penstemon eatonii 0.11bs/acre Possible seed vendors: Arkansas Valley Seed Pawnee Butte Seed Granite Seed 303 320 7500 1800- 782-5947 1801- 768-4422 Noxious Weed: The contractor will be responsible for the control of noxious weeds during a one year warranty period. The City of Aspen will perform monthly inspections of the area. Inspection of materials: The contractor will be required to provide a fax, hand deliver or participate in a on-site inspection of the specifications for the seed mix, certified weed free straw and top soil. Irrigation: Restoration areas require supplemental above ground irrigation system. Irrigation shall be installed in a manner that provides full coverage of the disturbed area for a period of two years. Engineering Comments—Exhibit B (this was an email sent to the applicant) I understand that the intent of the slope reconstruction was to bring the Hallam Lake Bluff back to its historical condition and that is why I have thus far supported the idea, especially since the underlying concept was to do no harm to the slope above Hallam Lake. The slope from the fence above the lake to the existing top of slope is approximately 60 degrees. The reconstructed slope proposed was staked to match this severe slope condition. As you know,upon seeing the severity of the angle my gut feeling was that 60 degrees was far too steep. You asked that the Engineering Department investigate what angle we could support for the reconstruction project. We have been working on the maximum allowable slope above Hallam Lake and here is our guidance. The Hallam Bluff code language reads that no water is to be discharged over the slope. While you have stated that the runoff from the house and the area above the reconstructed top of slope will be controlled via pavers or some other method,there is really no way to control the precipitation falling between the top of slope as it exists today and the proposed top of slope. Therefore, any rainfall that lands on the reconstructed slope cannot be controlled. The runoff will sheet flow down the new slope and eventually turn into channelized flow at some point on the existing slope. The URMP allows for a discharge of 7fps. Using the Mannings equation for sheet flow, we have determined that the maximum slope that can be constructed with a discharge below 7fps is approximately 18+/-degrees or a 3:1 slope. The 3:1 slope is an aggressive slope because after the flow runs down the new,proposed slope and eventually becomes channelized on the existing slope, the flow velocity will increase, and thus increase the chance for erosion. We continue to support a reconstruction of the Hallam Lake slope at 360 Lake, however, at a much reduced angle. RECEIVES MAR 2 7 2013 ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: CITY OF ASPEN Name: 360 Lake Location: 360 Lake Ave, Aspen CO 81611 - Lot 1 - Erdman Partnership Lot Split Indicate street address,lot&block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) 273512132001 APPLICANT: Name: Bell 26 LLC (Dennis Burch) Address: P.O. Box 1860 Bentonville, AR 72712 Phone#: 480-659-0259 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Steev Wilson Address: 117 South Spring St. Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone#: 970-279-4109 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ® ESA—8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc. Existing Single Family Residence that is not in compliance with the Bluff Review and the site has been altered from its historic topography. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc. To remove some of the noncompliant structure from the lake side and place that square footage on the other side. The restoration of the 'Historic' top of bluff line and drainage patterns. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 5,14 0.0 0 X❑ Pre-Application Conference Summary X❑ Attachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement ® Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form X❑ Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 360 Lake Applicant: Dennis Burch, Bell 26 LLC Location: 360 Lake Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 Zone District: R-6 Lot Size: 23,954.75 sf.. Lot Area: 15,624.75 sf. (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: N/A Proposed.• N/A Number of residential units: Existing: N/A Proposed.• N/A Number of bedrooms: Existing: 4 Proposed: 5 Proposed% of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: TDR Floor Area: Existing: 4064.00 Allowable: 4718.00 PYOposed. 4635.50 Principal bldg. height: Existing: 3 0'-7" Allowable: 251-01, Proposed: 24'-l" Access. bldg. height: Existing: N/A Allowable: N/A Proposed: N/A On-Site parking: Existing: 2 Required: 2 Proposed: 2 % Site coverage: Existing: 10% Required: 25% Proposed: 12.3% % Open Space: Existing: 9o% Required: N/A Proposed: 87.7% Front Setback: Existing: lo, Required.• 10, Proposed.• 10, Rear Setback: Existing: 20, Required.• 10, Proposed: 20, Combined F/R: Existing: 30, Required: 20' Proposed: 30' Side Setback: Existing: 20, Required: 20, Proposed: 20, Side Setback: Existing: 30, Required: 30, Proposed: 3 0' Combined Sides: Existing: 50' Required: 50' Proposed.• 50' Distance Between Existing N/A Required: N/A Proposed: N/A Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments:See the attached 'Scope of Work' letter. Variations requested: See the attached 'Scope of Work' letter. Hallam Lake Bluff review—Summary Letter The proposal is for a major remodel of a residence and the reconstruction of a portion of the bluff on the lot at 360 Lake. The existing house has cut into the bluff lowering the uniform bluff line creating a bench. On this lowered bench a house was constructed that protrudes into the bluff and is located far closer to Hallam lake than would be allowed under the current code. The proposal would remove the sections of the existing house from the area of the historic Hallam Lake Bluff, reconstruct the bluff, and replace the demolished area of the structure on the side opposite the bluff facing side of the house. This project does not seem to fall under any of the exemptions to the Hallam Lake Bluff Review process. The existing non-conforming structure, and the non-conforming cut in the bluff itself, will require us to do work in those areas requiring review in order to decrease the non-conformity and restore the bluff. Hallam Lake Bluff Review standards—summary of reduction of non-conformity. 1. No development shall be permitted within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development meets all of the following requirements: The existing nonconformity of the bluff cut to create the bench anomaly would be removed and made continuous. The portion of the nonconforming structure protruding past the historic bluff line would be entirely removed. The remaining core of the existing structure would be reduced in its nonconformity considerably; both the area of the footprint of the structure within the 30'bluff set back, as well as the reduction of those portions of the structure which intrude on the 45 degree top of bluff height allowance. Pending the design of the structure, this fits the intent of the Hallam Lake Bluff Review, reducing non- conformities and reducing visual impact of the structural; This project has the support of the Planning Staff as a significant improvement to the existing nonconformity. From a meeting with Sara Nadolny on 10/19/2012. 2. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. The bluff that has been removed as part of a previous project will be restored, rehabilitated, and revegetated to match the native slope and vegetation. 3. All development within the fifteen foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the fifteen foot setback shall not be approved unless the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the following conditions can be met: a) A unique condition exists on the site where strict adherence to the top-of-slope setback will create an unworkable design problem. The existing residence which is being remodeled is not only in front of this set back, but in many places it is in front of the historic bluff line itself. b) Any intrusion into the top-of-slope setback or height limit is minimized to the greatest extent possible. The new development will remove the portions of the existing structure beyond the bluff line and the new development will be behind the the rehabilitated top of slope, within perimeter of the remaining existing structure, and below the existing ridge height of the existing structure. Attached you will find drawings which use a similar methodology to the percent exposure calculation for FAR, to calculate the amount of surface area exposed above the height limit. The existing structure has a non-conforming surface area which encroaches on the bluff of 2,577 SF of wall area. The proposed remodel to the existing 0 structure will restore the bluff and decrease the non-conforming surface area to 1,884.5 SF. The remodel will move the building away from the bluff considerably and reduce the non- conforming surface area by 692.5 SF. The existing ridge will be maintained and all development proposed in this remodel will occur below it. c) Other parts of the structure or development on the site are located outside the top-of-slope setback line or height limit to the greatest extent possible. The primary part of the addition is located outside the bluff setback. The idea being that we are removing non-conforming square footage from the bluff side of the residence and replacing it away from the bluff below the existing ridge. d) Landscape treatment is increased to screen the structure or development in the setback from all adjoining properties. The screening to the neighbors is in place and well established, the landscaping of the bluff will restore its original topography and vegetation and will increase the screening of the existing development from the shore of the lake and from ACES. 4. All development outside the fifteen foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five-degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.104.100 and the method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020. See the explanation of non-conformity reduction in section 2b, and the drawings attached. The proposed remodel will be reducing the encroachment into these areas significantly. 5. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty percent(50%) of the development as viewed from the rear(slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. We are not removing any vegetative screening from the slope side of the residence and we will be revegetating the restored slope to screen from the lake and will maintain it accordingly. 6. All exterior lighting shall below and downcast with no lights) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. We will comply with this, see the attached lighting plan. 7. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. The existing bench cut into the bluff and the site drainage associated with this cut are not in conformance with the URMP and are contributing to the erosion of the Hallam Lake Bluff, while inserting untreated storm water to Hallam Lake. The top of bluff can be restored responsibly using a series of small lifts which are appropriately retained, compacted, and planted considering that while the stabilizing vegetation is being established the fill must be controlled for sediment leaving the site. With the bluff restored to its historic grade the fill area creating an open space between the structure and the edge of bluff can be use to create detention and treatment area for storm water in conformance with the URMP. As part of this Major Development the exposed drain pipes that project into the bluff, those areas of surface drainage which are causing erosion, and general site drainage conditions will be upgraded to conform with the URMP. Pending the design of the specific treatment, detention, and erosion control plan, as well as a maintenance agreement for the vegetation retaining the constructed slope; this project has Engineering's support, as we feel it would be a significant improvement to the existing nonconformity and will bean asset to the longevity of the bluff. From a meeting with Josh Rice on 10/19/2012 8. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope and pertinent elevations above sea level. Please see the attached drawings. f' • ,FFe/// I APr a—K-71 �Y- — T- , �i 1t rc I- - - - J.. .-- - - - - r-'� 1 1 rc kC to r t ° I 410. \— — yy,��,,• a Two"� 1 t • 1 I I 1Meas tc1 Sput \ — — — — — — — — - 330, 431 a, 312. - - - - - � _ — _ — I \\ — — — 1 400. GIlLf3Pl @37 1 I 515, . 4M• 710. 311, • 701, ❑ � r ( LOCATIO � H PEARL CT z L 614. I � / s1A, 335, z a1s, hit. 0 I I / 536, 617. L tart tat&pt r FT- D 1 r Hellatn Lake s00, � — � — � 1 1 602, table LA u.e Ay. ~1 I ) I I 0--NkdwO Dads•CWP%"IC)1182.7012 ESM bi �d20• � 1 q Bell 26 LLC P.O. Box 1860 Bentonville,AR 72712 November 27,2012 City of Aspen Building Department 130 South Galena SUvd Aspen,CO 81611. To Whom It May Concern: Please accept this letter as our approval for Forum Phi, Inc.to apply for and pull any necessary construction permits required to complete the remodel and repairs of the property 360 Lake Ave, Aspen,Colorado. The following is the name and address for the company. Mr. Steev Wilson Form Phi,Inc. 117 S.Spring Street,Suite 202 Aspen,Colorado 8161.1 Ph: 970-2794109 Fax: 866-770-5585 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Bell 26 LLC. Managing Member Bell 26 LLC may. Al 1 r � �•..4�t �1 �,� ."� � d �� I II III / 7 } a�e.r - .rr►��ly�r - � r i•y j tom, jl� 4 �.'.04fK' AP AkI ��w'�� - .�� ` .� tow S •�.L.'�� "Aa aRF Sj� y-a is• ...�-;: -� w ,, � ��� t � � � CITY Or ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Sara Nadolny 970-429-2739 DATE: October 4,2012 RECEIVED Updated: February 22, 2013 PROJECT: 360 Lake Avenue REPRESENTATIVE: Steev Wilson MAR 2 7 2013 APPLICATION TYPE: Hallam Lake Bluff Review CITY OF ASPEN DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Hallam Lake was annexed into the City on April 29, 1998, recorded under Reception No.416227, Book 44 Page 94. This parcel is Lot 1 of the Erdman Partnership Lot Split. There is an existing single family residence on the property, which is located in the Hallam Lake Bluff special review area. The home was constructed in the early 1990's, within the area of the bluff that is within the required thirty foot setback, past the top of slope line. This setback and enhanced review criterion was implemented subsequent to the home's construction. The applicant is interested in removing floor area that is in the greatest proximity to Hallam Lake Bluff and replacing it on the east side of the home, which is that furthest away from the top of slope. Although this FAR swap will not correct the issue of the home being located within the thirty foot Hallam Lake Bluff setback, it does remove part of the home that is closest to the environmentally sensitive area and place it farther away. The applicant is also interested in restoring the land in this area to its original grade,which will be determined by the City's Engineering Dept. All new residential development will also be reviewed for compliance with the Residential Design Standards of the Land Use Code. Any proposed plans will require review by the City's Parks and Engineering Depts, and will require hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.104.100 Definitions: Development 26.304 Common development Review Procedures 26.435.060 Hallam Lake Bluff Review 26.410 Residential Design Standards Land Use Code is available at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and- Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Application is available at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/landuseappform.pdf Review by: P&Z approvals related to Environmentally Sensitive Area Review require a deposit of $3,250 for 10 hours of review time. Additional time is billed at a rate of $325 per hour. Minor Referrals from Parks and Engineering are also required; Engineering is an hourly fee billed at $265, whereas Parks provides a flat fee for all review and referral time at $1,625. Referral Agencies: Parks and Engineering. Planning Fees: $3,250 Referral Agency Fees: Parks. $1,625 (flat fee); Engineering. $265.00 (hourly rate) Total Deposit: $ 5,140 To apply, submit the following information: ❑ Proof of ownership with payment. ❑ Signed fee agreement. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages,judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ Total deposit for review of the application. ❑ 12 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. List of adjacent property owners within 300'for public hearing ❑ Copies of prior approvals. ❑ Applications shall be provided in paper format(number of copies noted above) as well as the text only on either of the following digital formats. Compact Disk (CD)-preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk. Microsoft Word format is preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable. ❑ Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920- 5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. Memorandum Date: April 29, 2013 To: Sara Adams, City of Aspen Planning From: Brian Flynn, Parks Department Re: 360 Lake Ave A) Site plan: 1) The City will need a site plan that shows or identifies the areas of impact on the Hallam Lake Bluff-where will excavation take place, how deep, type of machinery, storage of materials,what utility,etc..... N B) Tree Protection: 1) A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines.A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set It is recommended that this protection fence be placed along the extent of impact on the Hallam Bluff. 2) No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. As referenced in Chapter 13.20 3) Any access across or through the area of protection is prohibited at all times C) Utility Connections: 1) How and where utility connections are made is a major concern relative to impact on the existing trees and areas of protection. D) Tree Permit: If a tree(s) is requested for removal,the applicant will be required to receive an approved tree removal permit per City Code 13.20, this includes impacts under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior to approval of the demo and/or building permits. If a permit is necessary, contact the City Forester at 920-5120. 0 Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or on site per City Code 13.20. Parks will approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. E) Hallam Bluff Stabilization: Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for protection of the Hallam Lake Bluff. The detailed plan shall identify the location of silt fencing. Minimum requirements include a silt fence and possibly straw bales placed in a manner preventing erosion protecting the Hallam Lake Bluff from residual run-off. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan for Construction staging. This plan shall detail how the construction will take place with staging, storage of materials and locations of vehicles so that trees remaining on site will not be impacted and remain protected. As required by Ordinance 26.440.060 The Parks and Engineering Department will have to approve the final slope stabilization plan. The work should be designed and completed by a company or companies that have experience in this specific line of work, providing examples and an understanding of the history working with this type of stabilization. 9 F) Access: The applicant should detail how the existing structure and other improvements will be accessed, removed and restored without creating additional impacts to the undisturbed portions of the property along the Bluff. G) Re-vegetation/Restoration: Parks requires approval of a full re-vegetation or restoration plan that should include seed mix, plant species, irrigation and a noxious weed control plan. Approval of a landscape permit is contingent on an approved re-vegetation plan. The following specifications will help in the design and plan for restoration of the site: City of Aspen Restoration Specifications A. The contractor is required to restore the disturbed area to City of Aspen standards. A plan will be required for review and approval and shall include, but not be limited to; seed mixes and amounts, plant materials and amounts, proper plans for installation, seeding and irrigation. The Parks Department is available to meet with the contractor prior to submitting a design. B. At the completion of the work, the Parks Department,will meet on site to inspect and sign off on the finished work and give approval for completion of the restoration. All areas of disturbance shall be restored to the following standards: Top Soil: All disturbed areas shall be restored with a minimum of eight (8) inches of topsoil. Top soil shall be sifted and free of structural materials. Top soil should be integrated into the disturbed area in order to match existing grades. Parks Department Staff will need to inspect soil quality and depth. Seeding Procedure: Hand broadcast in areas of disturbance (phase one of seeding is complete coverage of area, phase two is distributing seed at a 90 degree angle to the phase one distribution) 1. Rake seed into soil 2. Hand broadcast Bio-sol fertilizer 3. Cover area with certified weed free straw 4. Tackify area of disturbance (stabilize straw) Restoration Seed Mix: • Indian Rice Grass 'Nez Par' -Achnatherum hymenoides 'Nez Par' 3.0 lbs/acre • Sideoats Grama- Bouteloua curtipedula 'Pierre' 4.0 lbs/acre • Sandberg Bluegrass- Poa secunda 'Sherman' 0.5 lbs/acre • Thickspike Wheat Grass - Elymus lanceolatus 2 lbs/acre • 'San Luis' Slender Wheatgrass - Elymus trachycalulus 3lbs/acre • 'Garnet' Mountain Brome - Bromus marginatus 'Garnet' 31bs/acre • Arizona Fescue - Festuca ovina 'Arriba' 2.5 lbs/acre • 'Arriba'Western Wheatgrass - Pascopyrum smithii 'Arriba' 2.5 lbs/acre • Hairy Golden Aster- Chrysopsis villosa 0.25 lbs/acre • Lanceleaf Coreopsis - Coreopsis lanceolata 0.5 lbs/acre • Silver Lupine- Lupinus argenteus 1.0 lb/acre • Blue Flax- Linum lewisii 1.0 lb/acre • Rocky Mountain Penstemon Penstemon strictus 2.0 lbs/acre • Siberian wallflower 0.15 lbs/acre • Sweet William Pinks 0.15 lbs/acre • Perennial Gaillardia 0.351bs/acre • Annual Baby's breath 0.10 Ibs/acre • Cornflower 0.15 lbs/acre • Shasta Daisy 0.25 lbs/acre • California Poppy 0.15 Ibs/acre 0 • Corn Poppy 0.10 lbs/acre • Purple Coneflower 0.15 lbs/acre • Firecracker penstemon - Penstemon eatonii 0.1 lbs/acre Possible seed vendors: Arkansas Valley Seed Pawnee Butte Seed Granite Seed 303 320 7500 1800- 782-5947 1801- 768-4422 Noxious Weed: The contractor will be responsible for the control of noxious weeds during a one year warranty period. The City of Aspen will perform monthly inspections of the area. Inspection of materials: The contractor will be required to provide a fax, hand deliver or participate in a on-site inspection of the specifications for the seed mix, certified weed free straw and top soil. Irrigation: Restoration areas require supplemental above ground irrigation system. Irrigation shall be installed in a manner that provides full coverage of the disturbed area for a period of two years. Sara Adams From: Steev Wilson <swilson @forumphi.com> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 7:28 AM To: Josh Rice Cc: Sara Adams; Trish Aragon; April Long; Brian Flynn Subject: Re: 360 Lake Slope Josh, Thanks for getting back to me on this issue. I am a little confused how the reconstruction of the bluff to its previously existing condition which as you noted is typically greater the 45 degrees should be reconstructed to an angle near 18 degrees? I understand the erosion control issue concerning the runnels, however, I don't understand how this erosion isn't occurring around the rest of the bluff. If the slope surround the bluff is all eroding slowly,then is this not the historic condition? I know we have talked a lot about Bar X project, and I'm wondering what slope they are maintaining and why we can not maintain a similarly steep slope?Can you give me a call this morning? I owe Sara the drawings this AM at 9 and changing the slope angle this late in the game changes everything. Sara, What should I do with this new information? Thank you, Steev Wilson AIA, LEED'" AP Partner I Forum Phi, LLC Ste. 202 1 117 S. Spring St. n � Aspen Colorado 1 81611 p. 970.279.4109 +I f. 866.770.5585 •C�/` �U Vd On 5/15/2013 9:51 PM,Josh Rice wrote: L - >Steev, Y� > I understand that the intent of the slope reconstruction was to bring the Hallam Lake Bluff back to its historical condition and that is why I have thus far supported the idea, especially since the underlying concept was to do no harm to the slope above Hallam Lake. The slope from the fence above the lake to the existing top of slope is approximately 60 degrees. The reconstructed slope proposed was staked to match this severe slope condition. As you know, upon seeing the severity of the angle my gut feeling was that 60 degrees was far too steep. You asked that the Engineering Department investigate what angle we could support for the reconstruction project. We have been working on the maximum allowable slope above Hallam Lake and here is our guidance. >The Hallam Bluff code language reads that no water is to be discharged over the slope. While you have stated that the runoff from the house and the area above the reconstructed top of slope will be controlled via pavers or some other method, there is really no way to control the precipitation falling between the top of slope as it exists today and the proposed top of slope. Therefore, any rainfall that lands on the reconstructed slope cannot be controlled. The runoff will sheet flow down the new slope and eventually turn into channelized flow at some point on the existing slope. The URMP allows for a discharge of 7fps. Using the Mannings equation for sheet flow, we have determined that the maximum slope that can be constructed with a discharge below 7fps is approximately 18+/-degrees or a 3:1 slope. The 1 3:1 slope is an aggressive slope because after the flow runs down the new, propose, slope and eventually becomes channelized on the existing slope, the flow velocity will increase, and thus increase the chance for erosion. >We continue to support a reconstruction of the Hallam Lake slope at 360 Lake, however, at a much reduced angle. >Thank you, >Josh Rice, P.E., CFM > Development Engineer > 130 S. Galena St. >Aspen, CO 81611 > (970) 429-2750 >.Josh.rice @cityofaspen.com > "The mission of the Engineering Department is to enrich Aspen's distinctive character so that it remains one of the world's premier mountain communities by protecting the natural environment, improving water quality, enhancing the pedestrian experience and minimizing construction impacts for the enjoyment of residents and guests alike." z I � l r � i \ r- I e F� 1 j'/ I' I j j ri ��I���IY� .. -, � � I � I illl , i�i �i �, I ',I ; jii ' � ", ',�' �II 'ii � li � � i �il 1� I �Ijiiiillll� � j V � jiillii III i l l I � � ICI � � � �� I � � i, � �� � i ; i � i �, i � '� � � ii � , I , j � � i i � u �i � l ' lli , l�lf I ;� � IIi � II � d'I � ,! � � 5/16/13 Forum Phi Mail-RE:360 Lake-Hallam Lake Bluff Review-Meeting Summary G Iffi 0 0 "C""Al .......................... ............ ..................... ....................... RE: 360 Lake - Hallam Lake Bluff Review - Meeting Summary Josh Rice <Josh.Rice@cityofas pen.com> Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:39 PM To: SteevWilson<swilson@forumphi.com>, Josh Rice<Josh.dce @ci.aspen.co.us> Steev, Thank you for typing up the notes. I agree with your meeting summary. Josh Rice, P,E, Development Engineer Rorn: Steev Wilson [ma ilto:swilson@forkirn phi com] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:30 AM To: Josh Rice Subject: Fwd: 360 Lake - Hallam Lake Bluff Review- Meeting Summary Just a reminder to shoot over a thumbs up. Thanks Again. --Original Message X-Mozilla-Keys: Me ssa ge 4 D:<508*1 8548.1030809 a fon-I n phi.com> Date:Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:17:12-0600 From:steev<swilson@forU1T)phi.coin> Use r-Age nt:Mozilla/5.0(Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0)Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version:1.0 To:Sara Nadolny <Sara.Nadolny@ci.aspen,co,us>, Josh Rice<Josh.rice@ci.aspen.CO.LIS> Subject:360 Lake-Hallam Lake Bluff Review-Meeting Summary Conte nt-Type:multi part/mixed; boundary="----010908000700060100060303" https:/Imail.google.corrVrnail/ca/u/0/?ui=2&ik-56e53587a4&\Aew=pt&q=RE*/`3A36OLale-HallamLak-Bluff Review-Meeting SumrnarAqs=true&search=que... 1/2 5116/13 Forum Phi Mail-RE:360 lake-Hallam Lake Bluff Review-Meeting Summary 0 0 Thanks for a good meting this morning. I typed up the meeting notes as I remember them, please feel free to make edits. Please let me know if there is anything I forgot, misunderstood, or misrepresented. Thank you and I hope you agree. Have a great weekend! Steev Wilson AIA, LEED- AP Partner Forum Phi, LLC Ste. 202 117 S. Spring St. Aspen Colorado 81611 P. Please note my new cityofaspEn.COM email address and update your records accordingly. My old ci.aspen.coms address will be expiring soon. https://mail.g oog le.com/mail/Ca/u/0/?ui=2&ilr 56e53587a4&view=pt&q=RE%3A 360 Lake-Hallam LaW Bluff Renew-Meeting SummarAq s=true&search=q ue... 212 Meeting Notes: 10/19/2012 Project: 360 Lake Ave Subject: Bluff Reconstruction In Attendance: Josh Rice, Sara Nadolny, Steev Wilson 360 Lake,Hallam Lake Bluff Reconstruction, Summary of Project, The proposal is for the reconstruction of a portion of the bluff on the lot at 360 Lake. The existing house has cut into the bluff lowering the uniform bluff line creating a bench. On this lowered bench a house was constructed that protrudes into the bluff and is located far closer to Hallam lake than would be allowed under the current code. The proposal would remove the sections of the existing house from the area of the historic Hallam Lake Bluff,reconstruct the bluff, and replace the demolished area of the structure on the side opposite the bluff facing side of the house. Hallam Lake Bluff Review Benefits, The existing nonconformity of the bluff cut to create the bench anomaly would be removed and made continuous. The portion of the nonconforming structure protruding past the historic bluff line would be entirely removed. The remaining core of the existing structure would be reduced in its nonconformity considerably; both the area of the footprint of the structure within the 30' bluff set back, as well as the reduction of those portions of the structure which intrude on the 45 degree top of bluff height allowance. Pending the design of the structure,this fits the intent of the Hallam Lake Bluff Review,reducing nonconformities and reducing visual impact of the structural; This project has the support of the Planning Staff as a significant improvement to the existing nonconformity. Engineering and UMP Benefits, The existing bench cut into the bluff and the site drainage associated with this cut are not in conformance with the URMP and are contributing to the erosion of the Hallam Lake Bluff, while inserting untreated storm water to Hallam Lake. The top of bluff can be restored responsibly using a series of small lifts which are appropriately retained, compacted, and planted considering that while the stabilizing vegetation is being established the fill must be controlled for sediment leaving the site. With the bluff restored to its historic grade the fill area creating an open space between the structure and the edge of bluff can be use to create detention and treatment area for storm water in conformance with the URMP. As part of this Major Development the exposed drain pipes that project into the bluff, those areas of surface drainage which are causing erosion, and general site drainage conditions will be upgraded to conform with the URMP. Pending the design of the specific treatment, detention, and erosion control plan, as well as a maintenance agreement for the vegetation retaining the constructed slope; this project has Engineering's support, as we feel it would be a significant improvement to the existing nonconformity and will be an asset to the longevity of the bluff. Meeting notes Written by Steev Wilson Reviewed by Sara Nadolny Reviewed by Josh Rice PAR. 3.2000— 1�57P - -ASPEN HOUSING OFC' N0.760 P.1 ���� IIIII 1111111111 IIIII 111 IIII"� ' II Ill! IIII - _ - 0645 02/18/2008 111004 OW J :S SILVI of i R 3.00 0.. 8.80 N 0.00 PITKIN UUNTY 00 AMENDMENT OF DEED RESTRICTION WHEREAS, an Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement Resident occupied Dwelling Unit ordinance Council Ordinance Oene�and pertain ng 1990, o the property No. 323854, to comply with City described as 201 Gillespie Street, Aspen, Colorado; WHEREAS, the legal description of the property was not included in the document and the physical address is inaccurate; and WHEREAS, the legal description is Lot 1, Erdman Lot Split, according to the Plat thereof recorded November 26, 1990, in Plat Book 25 at Page 42, in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office; and WHEREAS, the addressed stated as 201 Gillespie Street no longer exists, and this unit refers to the unit located at 360 Lake Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, this document amends physical address of the Occupancy Deed Restriction an d Agreement Resident Occupied Dwelling Unit Ordinance One recorded on June 25, 1990, at Reception No. 323854, and all other restrictions and conditions still apply to this unit located at 360 Lake Avenue. ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY By: Mary be=ts, Executive Director STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this 181' day of February, 2000, by Mary J. Roberts, Executive Director of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. W, v hand and official seal. A expires: I lav 1t1J . z oA- ..... sr �� Owner's Policy of Title insurance Fidelity National Title Insurance Company A Stock Company Policy Number 1312- 17 2 5 3 7 OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of.- I. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated herein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys'fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its duly authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A. Fidelity National Title insurance Company PITKIN C►©'LINTY TITL N X3286 TWO RIVERS ROAD, SUITE 22 BOX 6ASALT, PPOp4'F'T (970) 927 4993 EA an 927-4096 FAX e President ATTEST pac � �'4� Secretary Countersigned: d!:'�Authcfized Signature ALTA Owner's Policy(10-17-92) FNTIC Form No. 1312(6/93) SCHEDULE A-OWNER'S POLICY CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER PCT14911C2 February 25, 2000 @ 4:22 PM $7,145,000.00 1312-172537 1. NAME OF INSURED: BELL 26, LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN: BELL 26, LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 1, ERDMAN LOT SPLIT, According to the Plat thereof recorded November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. PITKIN COUNTY TPTLE,INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 (970)925-1766/(970)-925-6527 FAX THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE COVER SHEET. SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT14911 C2 February 25, 2000 c@ 4:22 PM 1312-172537 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Taxes for the year 2000 not yet due or payable. 7. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded June 08, 1888 in Book 55 at Page 2. 8. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations of Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement Resident Occupied Dwelling Unit Ordinance One, recorded June 25, 1990 in Book 623 at Page 696 and Amendment thereto recorded February 18,2000 as Reception No. 440645. 9. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. 10. Deed of Trust from : BELL 26, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin For the use of : ERDMAN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP Original Amount : $5,200,000.00 Dated : February 25, 2000 Recorded : February 25, 2000 Reception No : 440883 EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1, 2, 3 AND 4 ARE HEREBY OMITTED. ENDORSEMENT FORM 110.2 ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. POLICY NO. 1312-172537 PCT14911 C2 The Company hereby insures against any loss or damage which the Insured shall sustain as a result of the enforcement or attempted enforcement thereof against the land in connection with Item 7, Schedule B. The total liability of the Company under said policy and any endorsements thereto shall not exceed, in the aggregate, the face amount of said policy and costs which the Company is obligated under the Conditions and Stipulations thereof to pay. This endorsement is made a part of the policy or commitment and is subject to all the terms and provisions thereof and of any prior endorsements thereto.Except to the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the policy and prior endorsements, if any, nor does it extend the effective date of the policy and prior endorsements or increase the face amount thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be signed and sealed and to be valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. ISSUED AT PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., 601 E. HOPKINS AVE., ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: 4 Authorized Officer Report Date: 01/21/2000 08:44AM PITKIN COUNTY TREASURER Page: 1 CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE CERT,V: 20000168 SCHEDULE NO: R013160 ORDER NO:-14911 ASSESSED TO: VENDOR NO: 202 ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC DONNELLEY ERDMAN 601 EAST HOPKINS 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SUB:ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT LOT:1 BK:0025 PG:0042 PARCEL: 273512132001 SITUS ADD: 630 LAKE AVE ASPEN TAX YEAR CHARGE TAX AMOUNT INT AMOUNT ADV,PEN,MISC TOTAL DUE 1999 TAX 12,747.02 0.00 0.00 12,747.02 TOTAL TAXES 12,747.02 TAX YEAR ASSESSMENT ASMT AMOUNT INT AMOUNT ADV,PEN,MISC TOTAL DUE TOTAL ASMT 0,00 TAX YEAR TAX LIEN SALE TLS AMOUNT INT AMOUNT REDEMPT FEE TOTAL DUE TOTAL STATEMENT 0,00 GRAND TOTAL DUE GOOD THROUGH 02/29/2000 12,747.02 ORIGINAL TAX BILLING FOR 1999 TAX DISTRICT 001 - 1-AFS Authority Mill Levy Amount Values Actual Assessed CITY OF ASPEN 5.401 2,461.18 Land 2700000 262980 PITKIN COUNTY 3.101 1,413.10 Exempt 0 0 OPEN SPACE &TRAILS 2.514 1,145.60 Improve 1978500 192710 COUNTY HOUSING DEBT 0.372 169.52 --------- ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION 1.261 574.63 Total 4678500 455690 ASPEN SANITATION DISTRICT 0.234 106.63 ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT 8.265 3,766.27 COLORADO MTN COLLEGE 3.655 1,665.55 COLORADO RIVER WATER C 0.282 128.50 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL 1.500 683.54 ASPEN AMBULANCE DISTRIC 0.230 104.81 PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY 1.158 527.69 27.973 12,747.02 - TAXES FOR 1999 FEE FOR THIS CERTIFICATE 10.00 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY AND MOBILE HOMES-SEPTEMBER 1, REAL PROPERTY-SEPTEMBER L TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIERS CHECK. SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE ON FILE WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,THE COUNTY CLERK,OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. This certificate does not include land or improvements assessed under a separate schedule number, personal property taxes, transfer tax or misc. tax collected on behalf of other entities,special or local improvement district assessments or mobile homes,unless specifically mentioned. I,the undersigned,do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes due upon the above described parcels of real property and all outstanding sales for unpaid taxes as shown by the records in my office from which the same may still be redeemed with the amount required for redemption are as noted herein. In witness whereof,I have hereunto s "y and and s this 21s of January,2000. TREASURER, PITKIN COUNTY, THOMAS CARL OKEN, B 506 E. Main St. -Ste 201 Aspen, Co 81611 / (970) 920-5170 Pitkilo my Treasurer - Receip% Tax Payment Receipt 20004639 PARCEL NO: 273512132001 SCHEDULE: R013160 DATE RECEIVED: 03/01/2000 RECEIVED BY: CC ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP DONNELLEY ERDMAN 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 DESCRIPTION: SUB:ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT LOT: 1 BK: 0025 PG: 0042 PAYOR: REFERENCE: AMOUNT PCT#14911 CHECK 45677 12, 747 . 02 TOTAL RECEIVED 12 , 747 . 02 1999 TAX TAX PAYMENT WHOLE 12747 . 02 ALL CHECKS SUBJECT TO FINAL COLLECTION ! THANK YOU - Pitkin County Treasurer 506 E. Main St . - Ste 201 Aspen, Co 81611 Al 0 Jlq 570 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, for the consid- eration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to BELL 26, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, whose address is c/o o Brooke A. Peterson, Esq., Kaufman&Peterson, P.C., 315 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 305, Aspen, CO 81611, the following real property in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado: Z ') 4 o LOT 1,ERDMAN LOT SPLIT, according to the Plat thereof recorded November 26, a 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. also known by street and number as: 360 Lake Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611, with all its v 9 appurtenances, and warrants the title to the same, subject to and except for: 1. General taxes for 2000 and thereafter payable in 2001 and thereafter. 2. Building and zoning regulations. 3. All matters described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ALL REFERENCES BEING TO THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Signed this day of February, 2000. ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado Partnership Donnelley Erdq , General Partner vo STATE OF COLORADO ) 440881 M ) ss TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 02/25/2000 COUNTY OF PITKIN ) o � , a The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the undersigned authority on this the u� W M� day of , 2000 by Donnelley Erdman as General Partner of L u the Erdman Partnership, a Colorado partnership. = WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL. fi �grlNA Notary Public [SEAL] t� OT�R,gL� My commission expires:—"/ a .�, s �o N�...A ,G:o 1 111111 IIIII 111111 III 07 P II IIIII IIIII 111111 III IIIII IIII 1111 P 440881 02/25/2000 04:21P WD DAVIS SILVI My Commission Eviras 1110112003 1 of 2 R 10.00 D 714.50 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO EXHIBIT"A" I. Taxes for the 2000 not yet due or payable. 2. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded June 08, 1888 in Book 55 at Page 2. 3. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations of Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement Resident Occupied Dwelling Unit Ordinance One, recorded June 25, 1990 in Book 623 at Page 696 and Amendment thereto recorded February 18, 2000 as Reception No. 440645. 4. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. 40881 02/25/2000 ad,gio un no%kjwwlll Owner's Policy of Title insurance Fidelity National Title Insurance Company A Stock Company Policy Number 1312- 1725 3 9 OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A,sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of L Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated herein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys'fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its duly authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company PIT-KIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 23286 TWO RIVERS ROAD, SUITE 22 �"` "►s - P'O. ° BASALT, C•O 81621 1417 EA L S 1970) 927-4993 970) 927 4096 F X ATTEST President Cl 1l a Cam' Countersigned: secretary 4�'Authodzed Signature ALTA Owncr's Policy(10-17-92) FNTIC Form No. 1312(6193) SCHEDULE A-OWNER'S POLICY CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER PCT14912 February 25, 2000 @ 4:24 PM $2,045,000.00 1312-172539 1. NAME OF INSURED: BELL 26, LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN: BELL 26, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 2, ERDMAN LOT SPLIT, According to the Plat thereof recorded November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE,INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 (970)925-1766/(970)-925-6527 FAX THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE COVER SHEET. SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT14912 February 25,2000 c@ 4:24 PM 1312-172539 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Taxes for the year 2000 not yet due or payable. 7. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded June 08, 1888 in Book 55 at Page 2. 8. Terms,conditions, provisions and obligations of Occupancy Deed Restriction and Agreement Resident Occupied Dwelling Unit Ordinance One, recorded June 25, 1990 in Book 623 at Page 696. 9. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded November 26, 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1, 2, 3 AND 4 ARE HEREBY OMITTED. Report Date: 01/24/2000 07:56AM PITKIN COUNTY TREASURER Page: 1 CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE CERT#: 20000177 SCHEDULE NO: 8013161 ORDER NO:-14912 ASSESSED TO: VENDOR NO: 202 ERDMAN CINDA& DONNELLEY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC 360 LAKE AVE 601 EAST HOPKINS ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SUB:ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT LOT:2 BK:0636 PG:0188 PARCEL: 2735 12 1 32002 SITUS ADD: ASPEN TAX YEAR CHARGE TAX AMOUNT INT AMOUNT ADV,PEN,ivIISC TOTAL DUE 1999 TAX 9,272.22 0.00 0.00 9,272.22 TOTAL TAXES 9,272,22 TAX YEAR ASSESSMENT ASMT AMOUNT INT AMOUNT ADV,PEN,iv[ISC TOTAL DUE TOTAL ASMT 0.00 TAX YEAR TAX LIEN SALE TLS AMOUNT INT AMOUNT REDEMPT FEE TOTAL DUE TOTAL STATEMENT 0.00 GRAND TOTAL DUE GOOD THROUGH 01/24/2000 9,272.22 ORIGINAL TAX BILLING FOR 1999 TAX DISTRICT 001 - 1-AFS Authority Mill Levy Amount Values Actual Assessed CITY OF ASPEN 5.401 1,790.27 Land 1143000 331470 PITKIN COUNTY 3.101 1,027.90 Exempt 0 0 OPEN SPACE &TRAILS 2.514 833.32 Improve 0 0 COUNTY HOUSING DEBT 0.372 123.31 ---------- ---------- ---------- ASPEN FIRE PROTECTION 1.261 417.98 Total 1143000 331470 ASPEN SANITATION DISTRICT 0.234 77.56 ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT 8.265 2,739.60 COLORADO MTN COLLEGE 3.655 1,211.52 COLORADO RIVER WATER C 0.282 93.47 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL 1.500 497.21 ASPEN AMBULANCE DISTRIC 0.230 76.24 PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY 1.158 383.84 ---------- ---------- 27.973 9,272.22 - TAXES FOR 1999 FEE FOR THIS CERTIFICATE 10.00 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY AND MOBILE HOMES-SEPTEMBER 1, REAL PROPERTY-SEPTEMBER 1. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIERS CHECK. SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE ON FILE WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,THE COUNTY CLERK,OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. This certificate does not include land or improvements assessed under a separate schedule number,personal property taxes, transfer tax or mist. tax collected on behalf of other entities,special or local improvement district assessments or mobile homes,unless specifically mentioned. I, the undersigned,do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes due upon the above described parcels of real property and all outstanding sales for unpaid taxes as shown by the records in my office from which the same may still be redeemed with the amount required for redemption are as noted herein. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set y h nd and se this 24th o anuary,2000. TREASURER, PITKIN COUNTY, THOMAS CARL OKEN, BY j j 506 E. Main St. -Ste 201 Aspen, Co 81611 / (970) 920-5170 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED DONNELLEY ERDMAN and CINDA W. ERDMAN, for the consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00)and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, hereby sell and convey to BELL Ur 26, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, whose address is c/o Brooke A. Peterson, Esq., Kaufman&Peterson, P.C., 315 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 305, Aspen, CO 81611, the following m 0 N real property in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado: Z 2 N Ly o LOT 2,ERDMAN LOT SPLIT,according to the Plat thereof recorded November 26, COO a 1990 in Plat Book 25 at Page 42. C31 t LU �i W also known by street and number as: 350 Lake Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611, with all its tic U 3 appurtenances, and warrant the title to the same, subject to and except for: tic 1. General taxes for 2000 and thereafter payable in 2001 and thereafter. M f� 2. Building and zoning regulations. ,O0° 3. All matters described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein W by this reference. z VQ ALL REFERENCES BEING TO THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Signed this /gyp day of February, 2000. Do lley r Cinda W. Erdman y H STATE OF COLORADO ) d ss �o a COUNTY OF PITKIN ) m � Z The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the undersigned authority on this the z o 1 (n day of r`�z (, , 2000 by Donnelley Erdman and Cinda W. Erman. Eme o M. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL. � �Nm a Notary Public [SEAL] e �Na cc ��\STINq 40 My commission expires: I \ f u3 �m OTA cc Fe CY V4 of %lot- Ny Comm' on Epues 1110112W3 Feb. 22, 2000 3. 52PM No. .6F9 T. POST-CLOSING OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT THIS POST-CLOSING OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT, made this 49!E'�- day of 65v, , 2000,by and between the Erdman Family Partnership (hereinafter referred to as"Seller") and Bell 26,LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company(hereinafter referred to as "Buyer"). ). WHEREAS, the parties hereto contracted for the purchase and sale of the real property (hereinafter referred to as the "Contract") known as Lots 1 and 2, Erdman Family Partnership Lot Split("Premises")in Aspen, Colorado, and WHEREAS, on this date,the parties hereto will be completing closing of said Contract in accordance with the terms thereof, except that the Seller will be continuing to occupy the premises and will occupy said Premises after the date of closing and the Buyer is agreeable to this occupancy subject to the hereinafter stated terms and conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, and the parties hereto intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 1. The Buyer does hereby give its consent for the Seller to remain in possession of the Premises from the date of closing until 5:00 P.M., M.S.T. August 31,2000 at no rental. The tenancy hereby created shall be a tenancy for the term stated only. In no event shall the Seller remain in the Premises after 5:00 P.M., M.S.T., August 31,2000.. In the event the Seller wrongfully holds over and fails to vacate on or before 5:00 P.M.,M.S.T.,August 31,2000,the daily rental shall be Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00)per day. If Buyer is required to employ an attorney and/or to utilize legal proceedings to obtain possession of the Premises,Seller agrees to be liable for all attorneys' fees and court costs incident hereto- 2. The Seller hereby agrees upon vacating the Premises that it shall leave the same free and clear of trash and debris and professionally cleaned. Furthermore, the premises will be in substantially the same physical condition as of the date of closing of the Contract between Buyer and Seller. The Seller shall maintain all landscaping, flowers, trees, shrubbery and all improvements. All utilities and assessments shall remain in the name of the Seller until the date of vacancy and the Seller shall pay all charges for same accruing up to that date. 3. Except for claims arising out of the Buyer's negligence, it i.s understood and agreed that the Seller specifically releases the Buyer from any and all claims that the Seller might have for injury to itself or members of its family or its guests,and for loss or damage to its personal property during the period after closing until such time as it vacates the Premises. In addition,it is understood that from the date of closing, the Buyer shall maintain fire, vandalism and extended coverage insurance on the Premises with an appropriate absentee owner's liability clause. The Seller shall be responsible for the premium therefor until the date possession is delivered to the Buyer. In addition, gib� F?b. 22. 2000 3. 53FM No. lnFy F, 3/Y the Seller shall maintain an appropriate policy insuring it for loss or damages to its personal property and for loss or damages sustained by its family or guests or other third persons who may enter the Premises from the date of closing until such time as the Seller vacate. 4. It is further agreed and understood that the Buyer may enter the Premises to examine, maintain, repair or protect the Premises from damage. 5. The Seller has deposited with Pitkin County Title, Inc hereinafter referred to as "Escrow Agent", the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars($10,000.00), which is to be held as collateral security and applied to unpaid utility bills that may remain due and owing to the expiration of this Agreement, any extension thereof or holding-over period or applied to any damages to the Premises caused by the Seller, its family, guests, employees, tradespeople or pets, or other damages and expenses suffered by the Buyer as a result of a breach of any covenant or provision of this Agreement. The Escrow Agent acknowledges receipt of the aforesaid deposit which shall be deposited by it in an escrow account or in a banking or savings system within the State of Colorado. The Buyer shall provide the Seller,within thirty(30)days after the end of the tenancy,by fast-class mail directed to the last known address of the Seller, a written list of any damages to the Premises together with a statement of costs actually incurred. No later than thirty(30) days after the end of the tenancy,the Buyer shall cause the return of the deposit to the Seller, together with any interest earned thereon, less the costs for any damages rightfully withheld. Repairs required may be so substantial or of such a nature that work will not be completed within the thirty (30) day period following the termination of the tenancy, in which case Seller shall be notified of projected or estimated costs by the itemized list of damages, to be followed by a statement to Seller of costs actually spent by Buyer, as soon as Buyer is apprized of such information. 6. Notwithstanding the thirty(30) day period provided for in Paragraph 5, it is agreed that at the time the Seller vacates the Premises, the Buyer will expeditiously inspect the Premises and if all items as required hereunder have been satisfied, will immediately authorize the Escrow Agent to release the security deposit that Escrow Agent is holding_ In the event the parties hereto cannot agree as to the disbursement of the security deposit,then any dispute relative thereto shall be decided by an attorney practicing in Pitkin County, Colorado, with at least ten (10) years of experience in real estate matters mutually selected by the parties in good faith,and a decision by said party shall be conclusive with respect to the release of the security deposit and the Escrow Agent shall be held harmless by Buyer and Seller in the release of said funds. fn the event damages to the Premises are in excess of the security deposit, it is understood and agreed that the Seller shall be responsible for all additional damages sustained by the Buyer. In no event shall the Escrow Agent incur any liability in the event the security deposit proves insufficient. 7. It is expressly agreed that the Escrow Agent shall only have the obligation to hold the aforesaid funds in escrow and release them as directed pursuant to Paragraph 6. In the event that the Escrow Agent shall be required to participate in any legal or equitable proceedings in any capacity, the Buyer and Seller agree to be jointly and severally liable for reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses and costs incurred by the Escrow Agent. - 2 Y� Feb, 22, 2000 3 64F No, 1664 P. 4/4 V q 8- It is understood and agreed wherever used herein,the singular shall include the plural, the plural the singular and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. This agreement may be executed in counterparts and by facsimile,which when transmitted to the other party,shall have the force and effect of an original. WITNESS our hands and seals the day and year first above written. SELLER: BUYER: ERDMAN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP. BELL 26,LLC, A A197 ,— , any y- $Donnelley rd , General Partner �1.c/ ��- real esraialposiclos-occupwalt" 3 arcel Detail pi assessor.or assessor arce.asp. ccoun um er— Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Querk I Assessor Sales Search Clerk& Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search GIS Map I GIS Help Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Account Parcel 2012 Mill Area Number Number Property Type Levy 001 R013160 273512132001 FR SIDENTIAL F 32.325 Primary Owner Name and Address .............................. . . BELL 26 LLC PO BOX 1860 ........ ............... ....................... ...... BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description _ ..... ........._ ..........._.......... ..... Subdivision: ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT SPLIT Lot 1 I Location Physical Address: 360 LAKE AVE ASPEN ERDMAN PARTNERSHIP LOT Subdivision: SPLIT Land Acres: 10.000 Land Sq Ft: 23,956 2012 Property Value Summary of 3 'arce ttp: pi assessor.or assessor arce.asp. ccount um er Actual Value Assessed Value Land. F — 6,240,0001 496,700' Improvements• 1,894,200] 150,780 Total: '� 8,134,20011 647,480' .............................................................. Sale Date: 2/25/2000 – Sale Price: 7,145,000 Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: 1 F.Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 0 Residential Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics GARDEN LEVEL BSMT: 12,183 UNFINISHED BSMT: 660 FIRST FLOOR: 1,668 2ND FLOOR: 1,575 FINISHED GARAGE HEATED: 660 ROOF DECK: 463 ....... ......... ..................................................... WOOD DECK: 84 Total Heated Area: 5,426 Property Class: SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEMEN { Actual Year Built: : 1990 Effective Year Built: 1999 Bedrooms: 15 Baths: 5.5 Quality of Construction: V G T 13 Exterior Wall: IWOOD SD GO Interior Wall: JDRYWALL Floor: IBASE Heat Type: RAD WATER Heating Fuel: GAS Roof Cover: PROPANEL Roof Structure: GABLE/HIP r� �/0PInI ) ii.nn AA! arcei vetan pI Winasses so .or a s o are.asp f A ccounrf Neighborhood: NORTH "WEST E ' ASPEN Super Nbad: ICITY OF ASPEN Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County 1-lome Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. _......... .. ...... ........... .... ..___..... . .. .... Copyright©2003 - 2012 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. �f 3 q-tvE® COMMUNITv DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT W- Fill PEN t�OMMUN(TY DEVELO M NT Agreement to Pay Application Fees Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Dennis Burch Phone No.: 480-659-0259 Owner("I"): Bell 26 LLC Email: dennis @ramipartners.com Address of 360 Lake Ave Billing Bell 26 LLC Property: Aspen, co Address: P.O. Box 1860 (subject of 81611 (send bills here) Bentonville,, AR 72712 application) L > tAt PPJJ ,C0)'"1 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ 1,625 flat fee for Parks $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 3,250 deposit for 10 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$315 per hour. $ 265.00 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: R E knor&mawt o f L� So,-L ZG ue- -Fea THE Psoiw AT Chris Bendon 3`o 4-AKA Ave Community Development Director Name:Dennis Burch _ STlscv Wlt_W.l At n. City Use: Title: Vice President Fees Due: $ Received: $ November, 1 of . 1 • 1 920-5090