HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.825 Roaring Fork Rd.0069.2013.ASLU 40
THE CITY OF ASPEN
City of Aspen Community Development Department
CASE NUMBER 0069.2013.ASLU
PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735-12-1-04-016
PROJECTS ADDRESS 825 ROARING FORK RD
PLANNER SARA NADOLNY
CASE DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE
REPRESENTATIVE POSS ARCHITECTURE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.4.14
CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 4.30.14
ar. Permi#s
Aii
File Edit Record —Navigate Fomj Repcts Format Tab Help •3
Jump
_ _ Nl
Mam Custom fields E Routing
Status ;fee Summary Action Routing History _ ...,
Permit type
aspen Land tise Permit # 3C ES.2C11ASLd
0
I
a k � '
t Address 82, ROARING FORK RC ApklSuite
Q City ASPEN State CO Zip fi1;11
o
1
Permit Information
5. Masker permit Routing queue avluU Applied 11"TV" ?
z F Project Status pancinc Approved 1
o l
1 Description REESEE"'lA_C�S1Gt;t Rh�k#CE 3'.Ik�JC 3. 415 DOOR REPL,C:z�Ehk A4C Pa i OR Issued
ROOF REMODEL �I
,j Closed/Final
Submitted PGSSARCHFE `JRE09 C-52'-J, Clock Running Days C Expmes 1C:72,'2C1
Submitted via
Owner
Last name KO CH CHARLES G 3 ELZAE First name PC BOX 22H
i
IZHFA1 KS c,=^,.
Phone % Address
I
Applicant
Owner is applicant? Contractor is applicant?
Last name Kt1CH CHARLES v 8,EL' E First name P7 BOX u5
A V,`1C117A KS v 1201
Phone Cust# 29::22 Address
f ^
3
tender
Last name First name
Phone : Address
(
t
Enter the project name AspenGold5(server) diamam View 1 of 1
x
Q �"
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development.Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the,land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall
expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building
permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official,
pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation
is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property
rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management
allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the
Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trust P.O. Box 2256 Witchita KS
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address
Lot 16-A of the Second Aspen Company Subdivision commonly known as 825 Roaring Fork
Dr City and Townsite of Aspen, CO.
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
Residential Design Standard Variance permitting two windows measuring approximately 2' in
height and 4.5 feet in width to man one foot into the 9'-12' "no window zone" extending on
either side of the front door transom.
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan
Approval by the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission of a PUD Amendment via
Resolution 4 Series 2013 on 1/15/2013
Land Use Approvals) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
March 14th 2014
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
March 15th, 2017
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration
and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code.)
Issued this 4th day of Febr ry, 2014, by the City of Aspen Community Development
Director.
Chris Bendo , Community Development Director
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306
ASPEN LAND USE CODE
r
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: C t�
Aspen, CO
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
County of Pitkin )
�' ,� ; r 1 (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado,hereby personally certify that
I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section
26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following mamier:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days
after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is
attached he7-eto.
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after
an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy o the publication is attached hereto.
Si re
The foregoing"Affidavit of Notic " was acknowledged before me this JAQay
of , 20k-d by
PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the �I I ( D
approval of a sde specific development plan,and My commission expires:
the creation of a vested property right pursuant to
the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title
24,Article 68,Colorado Revised Statutes,pertain-
ing to the following described property:Lot 16-A of
the Second Aspen Company Subdivision,co%
Towns known as 825 Roanng Fork Dr.,City and
Townsite of Aspen,Colorado, Parcel ID: Notary u ZC
2735-121-04-016. On March 4,2014,the Aspen
Planning and Zoning Commission granted Res,- �-
dential Design Standard variance approval to per-
mit two small windows to be located on either side KAREN REED PATTERSON
of the front door's transom,located in the 9'-12'"no
window zone"on this home throwgh Paz Resole- NOTARY PUBLIC
contaccyt
Series Nppado ny at t e Girt ofrAspen Com- ATTACHMENTS: STATE OF COLORADO
pen Cooado(970 4 9-2739° Galena St,sJ City of Asppen en NOTARY ID#19964002767
Publish in The Aspen Times Weekly on March 13, COPY OF THE PUBLICATION My Commission Expires Feb Rla 15,2016
2014. [10014262]
RECEPTION#: 608734, 03/19/2014 at
10:04:00 AM,
1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION
Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO
RESOLUTION No. 3
(SERIES OF 2014)
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ASPEN APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT 16-A OF THE SECOND ASPEN COMPANY
SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 825 ROARING FORK DRIVE,
CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN
Parcel Identification Number: 2735-121-04-016
WHEREAS, The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trust, as owner of 825
Roaring Fork Drive, submitted a request for Residential Design Standard Variance for
consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission for a land use review to allow windows to
span the 9'-12' zone at the street-facing entryway of the residential unit; and
WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-15 Moderate-Density Residential zone
district and is Lot 16-A of the Second Aspen Company Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision plat for the property was originally approved by the Pitkin
County Planning and Zoning Commission on March 3, 1961 and is recorded in the records of the
Clerk and Recorder for Pitkin County at Plat Book 2, Page 263, Reception No. 122664; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has reviewed the request and has
submitted a recommendation of denial to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 4, 2014, upon review and
consideration of the recommendation of the Community Development Department, presentation
from the Applicant, and consideration of the proposal, the Planning and Zoning Commission
approves the review as requested by the Applicant, finding that it meets the criteria as described
in Subsection 26.410.020.D.2.a of the Land Use Code; and
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1:
Windows on either side of the street-facing entryway door shall be permitted to span through the
nine (9) foot to twelve (12) foot area, as measured from the finished first floor, and as indicated
in Exhibit A of this Resolution.
i
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan
development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless
amended by an authorized entity.
Section 3:
This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
APPROVED,9 the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 4ih day of
March,201
L rspamer,Chair an
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Deb ie Quinn,Assistant City Attorney
AT EST:
Linda Manning,Records anager
Exhibit A: Location and measurement of approved windows
z
Resolution Exhibit A
Approved Windows
t.
r s �
' f � x,1.1'`�.I •.��
4
i
I I tt
•
['
y ~
! i
Y,
a I
{
s '
J
i
5
—
i _
Regular Meeting- Plannin & Zoning Commission" March 4 2014
U Erspamer, Chair, called the meeting to order at 4:30 PM with members Tygre, Gibbs, Walterscheid,
McNellis, Nieuwland-Zlotnicki, and Elliott present.
Also present from City staff; Debbie Quinn,Jennifer Phelan and Sara Naldony
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Ms.Tygre said she stopped by the open houses at Aspen Square on her way to the meeting. There are 3
studios on the market. She said these are an example of the type of lodging that has worked for the
past 40 years. She said Staff's hybrid units may be similar to these. They rent well and have been
upgraded by the owners and are competitive. She said they are only 500 square feet.
Mr. Erspamer said he had dinner with someone who works at the Limelight and they said they are busy
in the off season. They have a Colorado rate and they are full.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Jennifer Phelan gave two dates for the commission training and the board agreed to the 3-18 meeting
since so far there is no agenda item. Debbie Quinn suggested that at the training each member give a
brief background so the members get to know each other. Ms. Phelan said that council gets their
packets through a software where the info is uploaded and wanted to know if there is a preference for
paper packets or going digital. Mr. Erspamer said he prefers paper. There was no interest from the
commission in going paperless. Ms. Phelan asked if the commission still wants to receive the
Community Development Update and they said yes.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
There are no public comments.
MINUTES - February 18, 2014
Ms.Tygre made a motion to approve the modified minutes seconded by Mr. Elliott. All in favor, motion
passed.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Mr. Gibbs recused himself from the public hearing for 431/433 W. Hallam St.
Ms. Quinn explained what a conflict of interest is.
Public Hearings - 431/433 W. Hallam, Residential Design Standards
Variances - Continued public hearing
Ms. Phelan stated the application was heard on January 7th but there was a limited board so the
applicant's representative asked for a continuation to this meeting. This application is for 431/433 W
Hallam St. Dylan Johns is the representative. The property is a duplex on a corner lot in the West End.
The existing duplex is proposed for demolition with replacement of a new single family residence. The
lot is 6000 square feet and does not have alley access. The residential design standards for lots with no
alley access require that the garage be set back 10 feet further than the front most wall of the house.
The design of garages are to have the look of being single stall doors or looking like single stall doors to
break up the massing of the garage doors. The applicant is requesting not to be required to set the
1
Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission"' March 4 2014
a sidewalk attainment zone. He also said this particular lot is several feet above the street level and
there is a noticeable slope.
Mr.Johns said the attempt to camouflage the doors is to really reduce the presence of the garage from
the street. He said if the commission prefers a two door solution they are fine with it. He said it is
possible to keep the massing as it was and have the plane of the garage come across in the same way.
He said Staffs opinion is based on what the code says they need to do but it is not about whether the
code says you can or can't but whether the code makes sense to this application and if other factors
apply.
Mr. Erspamer asked what was added since the last presentation. Mr.Johns said he added the slide
showing the pushed back version with the door face out to break up the fa4ade.
Mr. Erspamer asked how many of the 11 lots with the same configuration have been built recently. Mr.
Johns pointed out several Victorians, a converted garage, a duplex and one built in the 70's. Mr.
Erspamer asked Mr.Johns where he got the definition of hardship. Mr.Johns replied that is his
understanding of the definition. Ms. Phelan said there is no definition of hardship in the code. Mr.
Erspamer asked if there is an easement for a side walk. Mr.Johns said no. Ms. Phelan said there is
public right of way of about 10 feet on either side of the curb. She said the property line is shared with
the right of way.
Ms.Tygre said there was a time when properties were redeveloped they were required to join a
sidewalk improvement district. Ms. Phelan said she doesn't know anything about that. Mr. McNellis
said from the roof plan it does not look like they are losing any yard space. Mr.Johns put up a diagram
that illustrates the yard loss better than what was in the handout. He said the reason of pushing the
upper mass forward is to get more sky. Mr.Goode asked if they did have access from the alley would
they need the set back. Mr.Johns said if they had alley access the wall of the garage could go up along
the front fagade by right. Mr. McNellis asked in that situation would the material change on that side of
the house be required. Mr.Johns said other than materials being used appropriately there would be no
need. Mr. Erspamer asked if they could they make a fagade on the garage door to look like two doors
without actually having two doors. Mr.Johns said they can and would be happy to do that if the
commission didn't like the hidden concept.
Mr. Erspamer opened the public comment. No Public comment. Mr. Erspamer closed the public
comment period.
Ms.Tygre stated Mr.Johns comment on how he interprets the code may apply to him but the
commission needs to follow the code the way it is written. She said looking at A and B in the standards,
the appropriate design or pattern of development considering context doesn't mean every single house
that is existing has to have a certain context for it to be considered neighborhood context. The overall
impression of the West End is one where we want to minimize the appearance of garages. The fact
there are exceptions is not a convincing argument. She stated the second one about unusual site
specific constraints refers to things like a creek running through or physical constraints not that the
applicant bought a piece of property without alley access. She stated that was a choice and not a site
specific constraint. She stated for those two reasons she has to support Staffs recommendation.
Mr.Walterscheid said based on his understanding of how the lot is set up the garage does not face the
front of the house and in his opinion where the code states"the part which shall be set back at least ten
feet further from the street than the front most wall of the house". He said although it is facing the side
street it is not facing the front of the house. He said he has done the same thing Mr.Johns is suggesting
3
Regular Meeting— Plannin & Zoning Commissioner March 4 2014
Mr. Erspamer said there are two decisions, one about the garage door and the set back of the garage.
Ms.Tygre made a motion to deny resolution 2. No second, motion died.
Mr. Walterscheid made a motion to approve resolution 2. No second, motion died.
Raise of hand vote to see where the commission stands: who wants no ten foot set back—one vote
Who is in favor of ten foot set back—six votes.
Can there be a single garage door to make it look like two garage doors— Mr.Walterscheid said what
they are approving is an alternate material to make it appear as one door. six votes
Ms. Phelan said currently the one garage door variance is written so that the door materials match the
surrounding materials and wants to be clear that the one garage door can have separate looking
materials. Mr. McNellis said it could be separate materials or match the siding. Mr. Erspamer said he
prefers to leave it to the applicant.
Ms. Phelan said the motion will be to amend section one to deny variance 1a and 1b is granted with the
change that it is a two car garage door that either matches the materials used surrounding the garage or
alternative materials.
Mr. Erspamer asked her to state it again and Ms. Phelan said it would allow applicant to build a two car
garage door that does not need to look like a two stall door and there will be no language of materials.
Mr. McNellis made a motion to approve resolution 2 as written with the changes to deny 1a and change
1b to have a two car garage door that does not need to look like a two stall door, seconded by Mr.
Goode. Roll Call: Mr. Elliott yes, Mr. Nieuwland-Zlotnicki yes, Mr. Walterscheid Yes, Mr. McNellis yes,
Mr. Goode yes, Ms.Tygre No, Mr. Erspamer Yes. Motion carries.
825 Roaring Fork Road - Residential Design Standards Variance
Ms. Quinn said she has reviewed both affidavits of public notice, exhibit c, and they are appropriate.
Sara Nadolny, planner technician, said the applicant is Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trust and
representing the project are Glenn Horn and Julie Maple. She stated it is a land use review regarding
residential design standard. It is a residential West End property in the R15 zone district in the Second
Aspen Company Subdivision. The property is undergoing a remodel of the front facade and the
applicant is requesting a variance from the standard that prohibits windows in the 9-12 foot area. The
reason for the standard is to preserve the established neighborhood scale and character and promote
the pedestrian experience. She stated the 9-12 foot zone is typically an area where a 2nd level would
exist. The separation breaks up the massing of the building into two recognizable floors and reduces the
bulk of the building.
Ms. Nadolny said the applicant is proposing two windows at the front door location on either side of the
transom. The transom is permitted by right in the code. The windows are approximately 4%feet wide
by 2 feet tall. Only one foot of the height spans into the no window zone. She stated there are two
criteria to judge a variance, either a hardship on the lot-site specific constraint or an established
neighborhood character. She said this is a remodel and they are not finding any site specific
constraints. She stated this is a very diverse neighborhood with different types of architectural styles.
She said all of the homes in the neighborhood were built prior to the no window zone code which was
included in the code in 2005. She stated the majority of the homes do not have this condition visible.
5
Regular Meeting Planning & zoning Commission March 4 2014
Mr. Erspamer opened the public comment. There was no public comment. Mr. Erspamer closed the
public comment.
Mr. Erspamer stated he is all for an administrative review but understands Staffs position. He said he is
in favor for letting the applicant do these two windows, it is south facing and typical of other homes in
the neighborhood.
Mr. Goode brought up the argument that it is so hidden they should get the variance. When you start
talking about code why bother having any code for the whole property. He said they can follow the
code or not.
Mr.Walterscheid said the immediate context of the entry door whether the windows in question are
glass or metal there will be a window shaped object there. The intent to prohibit those two items seems
extreme. If the code allows a transom above the door why wouldn't they be allowed to do a transom
above the side lights.
Mr. McNellis said he agrees with Mr.Walterscheid but he also agrees with Mr. Goode. He said he thinks
the intent of the code applies to more Victorian architecture. He said personally he thinks windows
would look better there. He said the entryway feature acts as the differentiation of the upper and lower
floors.
Mr. Elliott said the transom created the separation of the floors.
Mr. Nieuwland-Zlotnicki said much of the code language is predicated on the pedestrian experience but
given the vegetation,the set back and the more suburban nature of the pedestrian oriented logic does
not necessarily apply for this area.
Ms.Tygre said the fact the lot is so wooded and the windows would not be obvious to a pedestrian
would affect her decision. She said she is concerned with light pollution but it is not one of the criteria.
Mr. Walterscheid made a motion to approve request for variance as set forth in resolution 3. Seconded
by Mr. Gibbs.
Ms.Tygre said given the context of this particular wooded lot she would like to make a reference that
this resolution applies to this specific lot and that they specifically met criterion A.
Ms. Quinn said if they wish to amend, it can be done in the second to last whereas clause. Ms. Quinn
said it would be a friendly amendment as long as it is accepted by Mr. Walterscheid and Mr. Gibbs. Roll
call vote; Mr. Nieuwland-Zlotnicki yes, Mr. Elliott yes, Mr.Walterscheid yes, Mr. Goode yes, Ms.Tygre
yes, Mr. Gibbs yes, Mr. Erspamer yes. All in favor, motion passed.
Mr. McNellis made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Walterscheid. All in favor, motion passed.
7
MEMORANDUM
TO: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Conunission
FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planner Technician
TEIRU: Jennifer Phelan,Deputy Director
RE: 825 Roaring Fork Rd.
MEETING DATE: March 4,2014
PPLICANVO WNERS: SUMMARY:
The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real The applicant requests the Planning and Zoning
Estate Trust Commission approve a variance from the Residential
Design Standard that prohibits street-facing window
REPRESENTATIVE: that span through the 9'-12' area of a residence,
Tenn Horn, Davis Horn Inc. measuring from the finished first floor. The applicant
would like to install windows on either side of the
LOCATION: transom above the street-facing entry door.
825 Roaring Fork Rd.
TAFF RECOMMENDATION:
CURRENT ZONING&USE: Staff recommends denial of die applicant's request fo
-15 zone district, Residential use a variance from this Residential Design Standard,
coding the request does not comply with the criteria
PROPOSED LAND USE: for receiving a variance.
The property will continue to be used
residentially.
Ilk
J'
Figure A: Image of subject property
Page l of 7
P29
LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES:
The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval:
• Variances from the Residential Design Standards —pursuant to Land Use Code Section
26.410.020.D.2. Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review board for this
request.
PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located in Aspen's west end near the music tent and the Aspen Meadows .
properties.
ti
Music Tent area
Figure B:Location of subject property indicated with star.
The property is Lot 16-A of the Second Aspen Company Subdivision, adjacent to the Aspen
Company Subdivision. This subdivision was established by Elizabeth Paepke and The Aspen
Company in 1961, at which time the land was subdivided into lots and roads were created. This
subdivision was also part of the Hallam Addition.
PROJECT SUNIN ARY:
The Applicant is requesting a variance from Land Use Code subsection 26.410.040.D.3.a,which
states "Street-facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would
typically exist, which is between the nine(9) and twelve feet(12) above the finished first floor."
The subject property is undergoing a redesign of its front facade, including the front entryway.
This entryway has been redesigned to include a transom above the front door, which is pennitted
Page 2 of 7
I;
0
P30
by the Land Use Code. According to the Code, a transom window above the main entry is
exempt from the 9'-12' "no window zone". The applicant would like to extend the glass
approximately 4.5' in width on either side of the door, and 2' in height. With this proposed
design, one foot of the proposed glazing spans 9' and above. This extension of the glass above
the front door does not fall under the definition of a transom.
11/1 " '.Xxi
I 7 `
��L.—_.J..�� - � � ° � __. - X4-1 ,yam__.' �.«�ALL_ \`� •/ �1 F
L----------
Figure C:Yellow indicates proposed windows on either side of the transom.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The Residential Design Standards were created with the intent of preserving the established
neighborhood scale and character, to promote the pedestrian experience, and to contribute to the
streetscape in the neighborhoods throughout the City. The standard the Applicant is seeking a
variance from disallows windows in the area measuring 9'-12' from the finished first Moor. This
"no-window zone"has been established because this area is typically where a second floor level
would exist. Minimizing glazing in the 9'-12' zone breaks the mass of the building into
recognizable first and second floor levels, creating articulation in the building's form and
softening its street presence. Staff has the expectation that all new development will conform to
the Residential Design Standards when such standards are able to be achieved.
The residence has a large grouping of windows on the second story level above the entry door.
The presence of additional glazing aside from what is permitted by Code creates a large glass
area without much relief or separation to indicate floor levels.
Staff has examined the Applicant's request in terms of the criterion for Variances from
Residential Design Standards (Exhibit A). There are two criteria to base a residential design
standard variance request on— 1)Does the request provide an appropriate pattern of design based
on the context of the surrounding neighborhood, or 2)1s the request clearly necessary for reasons
of fairness due to unusual site-specific constraints. Only one of the two criteria must be met in
order for a variance to be granted. Staff notes the following:
Page 3,_Qf 7
P31
when
In regards to criterion 1, Staff has considered asie a�lceneXVisual note Roaring offourkpropertiespin the
analyzing the Applicant's request. Staff h
surrounding neighborhood that appear to have windows spanning the 9'-12' "no window" zone,
only three of which are within the area of the front door. However,the majority of the properties
in the neighborhood do not have this condition. The surrounding neighborhood is a mix of
different housing types, with styles ranging from 1960's to modern. This particular Residential
Design Standard was first implemented in 2005 (via Ordinance 20, Series of 2005). Residences
having this nonconformity were constructed prior to this Residential Design Standard. Staff does
not fmd this condition to be typical of the architectural style of this neighborhood, and finds this
criterion to not be met. Below are images of the styles of homes that are found within the
Second Aspen Company Subdivision neighborhood.
Figure D:815 Roaring Fork Rd.
(2002) r
Figure E:845 Roaring Fork Rd.
(1977)
Figure F:805 Roaring Fork Rd.
(1983)
Page 4of7
;
P32
a,
Figure G:890 Roaring Fork Rd.
1979
{.
:: ( )
1 w
Figure H:800 Roaring Fork Rd.
(1989)
r
I{
Figure I:830 Roaring Fork Rd.
(1980)
f
i
Page 5 0 ,7
g
L
s
/ 1
0= � ..♦ -�. _ _. -_ . >. of J �. !� �'�
1 `ll ,I j7� '•���
Il;�li�• j ••1 • //•
- T- # •xf•. _, X15
r
/ �:�..."�°"�°•«tom.• O- 'a.. � ''
Lzi
��•; a ' '°: :tii '`yam 'R �v{ "'�:��..�a r.v",�..,�'+"`fi
P34
Regarding criterion 2, the subject property does not host any unusual site-specific constraints
which would require granting of the variance as a means of fairness to the Applicant's desired
design. Staff finds this criterion to also not be met.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds the request to not meet either review criteria associated with Variances from the
Residential Design Standards, and recommends denial of the application.
The following Motion and attached Resolution are written in the affirmative, approving the
request. The Planning and Zoning Commission must find the application to meet at least one of
the necessary criteria associated with a Residential Design Standard variance request and
therefore approve this application, approve the application with conditions, or find that the
application does not meet the criteria, and deny the application.
RECOMMENDED MOTION(ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE):
"I move to approve the request for a variance from the Residential Design Standard as noted in
Resolution_, Series of 2014."
ATTACHMENTS:
• EXHIBIT A—Review Criteria
• EXHIBIT B—Application
Page 7 of 7
N
P35
RESOLUTION No.
(SERIES OF 2014)
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE FOR .
OF ASPEN APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT 16-A OF
8 H ROARING FORK DROVE ANY
SUBDIVISION,COMMONLY AND OWNSITE OF ASPEN
Parcel Identification Number: 2735-121-04-016
WHEREAS, The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trust, as owni of for
Roaring Fork Drive, submitted a request for Residential, g n
consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission for a land use review to allow windows to
span the 9'-12' zone at the street-facing entryway of the residential unit; and
WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-1.5 Moderate-Density Residential zone
district and is Lot 16-A of the Second Aspen Company Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision plat for the property was original) ad in approved by the of the
County Planning and Zoning Commission on March 3, 1961 and is recorded
Clerk and Recorder for Pitkin County at Plat Book 2,Page 263,Reception No. 122664; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has reviewed th request and has
submitted a recommendation of denial to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 4, 2014, upon review and
consideration of the recommendation of the Community Development Department, presentation
from the Applicant, and consideration of the proposal, the Planning and Zoning Commission
approves the review as requested by Applicant; and
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning thcommisand finds that this resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion o public
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1:
Windows on either side of the street-facing entryway from the finished first floor, and athrough ndicated
nine (9) foot to twelve (12) foot area, as measured
in Exhibit A of this Resolution.
i
P36
Section 2•
All material representations and commitments made b the Applicant y e pp pursuant to the _
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan
development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless
amended by an authorized entity.
Section 3•
This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 4•
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Plaiuung and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 4"' day of
March,2014.
LJ Erspamer,Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debbie Quinn,Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
Linda Manning,Records Manager
Exhibit A: Location and measurement of approved windows ' -^
t
2 wY
d � -
,. o
w
o
x
d
1
• � �� •'-'�77 +4'.1 RCMY]MYIXIRS a.9i OI:N.LLIILI TM1)
i 1 i 1
.y 1 yl
r
d
V
P38 -
Exhibit A -
Review Criteria
Variances from the Residential Design Standards, Section 26.410.040, which do not meet this
Section may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Board of Adjustment or
the Historic Preservation Commission, if the project is subject to the requirements of
Chapter26.415. An applicant who desires to consolidate other requisite land use review by the
Historic Preservation Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning
Commission may elect to have the variance application decided by the board or commission _
reviewing the other land use application. An applicant who desires a variance from the
Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the
variance, if granted,would: _
a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which
the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the
context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of
the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting
or a broader vicinity as the board feel is necessary to determine if the exception is
warranted; -
Staff Response: The subject home is located in a residential neighborhood on Roaring
Fork Dr., which is a loop. Staff has considered the context of this neighborhood when -
analyzing the applicant's request. When new development is created within the City of -
Aspen, expectations are such that the requirements of the Residential Design _
Standards shall be complied with. Staff has taken visual note of three properties in the
surrounding neighborhood that have appear to have windows that span the 9'-12' "no -
window" zone. _However, the majority of the properties in the neighborhood do not
have this condition. The surrounding neighborhood is a mix of different housing
types, with styles ranging from 1960's to modern. It is difficult to tell whether the -
houses that have this condition were constructed prior to this Residential Design
Standard. At .any rate, Staff does not find this condition to be typical of the
architectural style of this neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. -
or
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints.
Staff Response: The residence is located on a 12,000+square foot parcel, of a regular _
rectangle shape. Staff does not note any unusual site-specific constraints associated
with this parcel, and does not find the denial of this request to be unfair. Staff finds
this criterion to not be met.
1
Z 0 . 14 E
FAiiL.7_ 1N3Wd4 JWNfIINW00
�_ I N3 d A0 X1110
10Z 0 7, AON
A R C H I T E C T S
LLO. 3AI333H
November 19,2013
A • City of Aspen Planning&Zoning Commission Mem rs
RE: Re st for Residential Design Standards variance r property located at 431/433
West Hall a Street.
To the esteeme embers of the Planning and Zoni Commission,
This is an applicatio to consider a variance exe tion from Section 26.410.040.C.2.b of
the Land Use Code, ' ich states: '*The front fade of the garage or the front-most
supporting column of a c ort shall be set back least ten(10)feet further from the street
than the front-most wall oft ouse."
The subject property is currentl nfigured a duplex residence and is located has the
addresses 431 &433 West Hallam . eet. a proposed design involves the demolition
of the existing structure and replacing i a Single Family Residence+ADU.
The configuration of this property is som unique when compared to the
predominant sub-urban pattern of devel men the West End. Rather than occupying
two platted town site lots and having tl long axis the lot extending from the Street to
the Alley(Notch/South),the long axis f this proper dented across a portion of three
town site lots in an East/West direct' . The southern l the three lots are owned by
the Weaver Subdivision with the a ress of 422 West 13 eel reet,and this area
currently serves as surface parkin nd a single story garage for 422 West Bleeker
residence.
The effect of this is anomaly i hat the property at the corner of 4th and Ha Street
does not currently have driv -ay access to the alley and is forced to access the rty
via a curb cut on 4`h Street. F the Property did have driveway access to the alleywa
(and the garage doors he facing the alley),this variance would not need to be
requested, since the Ian age within Section 26.410.040.C.2.b specifically states that the
front facade of the gar (i.e.garage doors) is required to be setback from the front fagade
of the Residence by feet,but does not specify that any other portion of a garage must be
located 10 feet beh' the front fagade of the Residence.
The Residential Design Standards were established to primarily protect the character of
the West End from redevelopment which was occurring there in the late 80's and early
90's, and thus were codified around typical lot configurations found in this Zone District.
The variance process was established to address situations where the lot configurations
ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS PO BOY 2508 ASPEN COLORADO 81612
ATTACHMENT a
-- WR 3
LANDS OF KOCH
��� o-i •�, al '�� , °i° — I •tl�'i 4 ___ �2 e•n v.•nvexnw sa on•mruu..e meters
I .... b Imo,� •� _�.-.�+ ..� � �� �•� i
,.�. r- .$„ ,.r �., ;�"" .�'•v✓•e�r� '.•-wag=' g�•�/< _�.��,.,
-- -- ---- ----- -
-- �° • --`-�--- _-_.-- _-:'--_-sue__- •--•'�::--=_�±'__ f ---_-�`=__ ,>---
ROARING FORA( ROAD ��� •s„ "� -'ems. �• �!
I
I
t
IMPROVEMENT AND PARTIAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
�. ,r a TIIE LANDS OF KOCH
_ DESCRIBED IN SPECU WARRANTY DEED
RECORDED M RECEPIIDN/173437
SSOR/2733-PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS
(ASg181-D101B)
(825 ROARING FORK RD.)
• �r°° _ _
ROBERT C.HUT70N
24T I
-.. �.e..•..w n� PR6>ESSIMIL VN3 SuR,EroR
t
t a
1
M
Attachment 3
♦ Roaring
Attachment 4 z
825 Roaring Fork Road: Second View of Entry from Road
i
,.
tie
f . fe ►,
JL:-
A,
Y
M1 X'
Attachment 1
Roaring Fork Road: of 1
-J
• • 1. � � X43 }/ � r _w�� »•r..
�\ ~ e�i1 � ��.♦ Vt
a
omk
Ir
�✓ to ��' �`i - ! ..� � rr=�3,
ATTACHMENT
puss
I%}11[CMF•flNWfli
1 !
I I
Iq�{
r i ... .��
asj
(D_LR OPOSED SOUTH_ELEVATION_
P1
F. Q
- � O .L►w ;Z-� I � edF♦ �NG�PIIWfgtlIAND
I
i PRBFOSEDBW -
tlmTm
y'-. � k -. � PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION A203
AWA
Attachment 9
7
View of Roaring Fork Road Facing Southwest North of Subject Site
Attachment 10
a
_ View of Roaring Fork Road Facing South
rx -V�
NN
F�
t
3 w• z ..
g
X 1
F�
[ r 1 Flt"T F1✓vy"r - '� .(�k .. y='
r
a
Attachment 11
..t
844 Roaring Fork Road: Front Yard
x¢ Attachment 12
Ilk
b:
805 Roaring Fork Yard: Front Yard
- I
F
f
;h
� R
F
AIW
- Attachment 13
I
f
, , _-Memo--,,.
865 Roaring Fork Road: Front Yard
0
Attachment 1.4
As
Oft
w
830 Roaring Fork Road: Front Yard
AVr�
- }1i
Attachment 15
E -
I
, r
�.
802 Roaring Fork Road: Front Entry
i
i
Attachment 16
7�
}
fig
885 Roaring Fork Road: Front Yard
)/2 E*bllt 0_"".
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:_
Aspen, CO
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
ml/ _2dY4 4 , 20 /4
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
County of Pitkin )
-74 , 1,1_&-,4,8 46 d (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days pri or to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof
materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six
(26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in
height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing
on the _ day of , 20_, to and including the date and time
of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the
property subject to the development application. The naives and addresses of
property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they
appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A
copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach,
summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as
required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the
neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and
a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto.
(continued 077 next page)
Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt
requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the
date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development.
The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current
tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that
create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially
Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement.
Rezoning or text aniendnzent. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any
way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this
Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be
made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or
otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal
description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of
real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the
proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning
agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing
on such amendments.
Si katu e
The f e oing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me his Aay
of , 20 ,by UDC L� (�1 5 � A�4, /7
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE:825 ROARING FORK ROAD
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD WITNESS �T HAND AND OFFICIAL ICIAL SEAL.
VARIANCE REQUEST WITNESS 1 V �J iJ
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing AA
will be held on Tuesday,March 4th,at a meeting to /� 1
begin at 4:30 p.m.before the Aspen Planning and ,f
Zoning Commission,Sister Cities Room,City Hall, My ommisslon expires:
130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to consider an applica-
tion submitted by The Charles and Elizabeth Koch
Real Estate Trust for the property located 825 s p p
Roaring Fork Road,represented by Davis Horn ce [!. Y In-
corporated.The applicant is requesting a variance LJ.J t'�./1����VV tt
from the Residential Design Standard that disal- 7,.
lows windows to be placed between 9'-12'on real- Notary Public
dential buildings. The property is legally described s' u
as Second Aspen Comparry Subdivision,Lot 16-A
Section 12,Township 10,Range 85,Land in Sec 's-_NDA M.
12-10-85 described as Lot 3,Block♦o and Parts of
Lake Avenue and Maroon Avon.in the Hallam
Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen.For
further information,contact Sera Nadolny at the °V9
City of Aspen Communittyy DflvefOPMSnt Depart-
ment, 130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970)
429.2739,sara,nadoIny@cityofaspen.com. kCHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: OF
Aspen Planning and zanin�''�,;,;', ILCTATION7 h 1 / i� c M�Cotnr�ssion Expires 031291201
Published in the Aspen Times on February 6,2014. ITIIE POS `l*D NOlTIC �SIIjN�
[9925302] '
• In r- V rri Y.RS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BY MAIL
• APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE
AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. x'24-65.5-103.3
� a
ATTACHMENT 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1 ``�"�' �� '"�:2 'F A-A"!Aspen,CO
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 3 � ' ,200 —1
STATE OF COLORADO )
SS.
County of Pitkin )
I, G Ve_ � (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen(15)
�ays prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty-six(26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 1-7 day of
Flo ,2044, to and including the date and time of the public
/ hearing. A photograph oft e posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department,which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen(15) days prior to
the public hearing,notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the
property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of
property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they
appeared no more than sixty(60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A
copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
A
Rezoning or text amendment. `�'�i�e'•`:_ _. . :: =,iai zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or arrien.c+,-.c ::,. e�:�iz`-ii: or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text cf th'*E ""it-le is lio be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and eciacfinent of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the-requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However,the proposed zoning map shall be available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen(15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amen ents.
J� � kv—,
Signature
n , ',c 14-
Th ' egoi "Affidavit of Notice"was a owled before me this day
of� �i% , 200—, by k
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL, SEAL
M -commis n exp'
` 4 PF�
°" ate/
®. a J
tT t
ATTACHMENTS:
COPY OF THE PUBLICATION
PDOTn6kAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIG19
LIST OF THE OwNECR.S f ND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BY MAIL
P o:>rc.1 '1,-1"1-l t j
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: 825 ROARING FORK ROAD—
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, March 4th,
at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission,
Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application
submitted by The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trust for the property located 825
Roaring Fork Road, represented by Davis Horn Incorporated. The applicant is requesting a
variance from the Residential Design Standard that disallows windows to be placed
between 9'- 12' on residential buildings. The property is legally described as Second
Aspen Company Subdivision, Lot 16-A Section 12, Township 10, Range 85, Land in Sec
12-10-85 described as Lot 3, Block 89 and Parts of Lake Avenue and Maroon Avenue in
the Hallam Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact
Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena
St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, sara.nadolny @cityofaspen.com
s/LJ Erspamer
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on February 6, 2014
City of Aspen Account
� fi Yl
1
4 t}
i
a:e V
E
i,14 q
p
iLLJ ,
V
wn. ,
'•it 1/ 4
C� GA CL
' �� i x�
�:,
sx '
z
V� �x
'W
��Uy
W E
i
i2-
P
ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
AML INVESTMENT II LLC ASPEN 805 LLC STUDIES
430 PARKSON RD 44 COOK ST#200 100 PUPPY SMITH ST
HENDLERSON, NV 89015 DENVER, CO 80206 ATTN KATIE SCHWOERER
ASPEN, CO 81611
BERMUDA PROPERTIES INC CHATFIELD CROSSINGS INC FARISH ANNE F 30%
ESTEE LAUDER CO ATTN JOAN C/O DWORMAN DARRYL 2200 WILLOWICK#16E
KRUPSKAS 65 W 55TH ST STE 4A HOUSTON, TX 77027
767 FIFTH AVE 40TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10019
NEW YORK, NY 10153
FARISH FAMILY 2012 GENERATION KOCH DAVID H TRUSTEE KOCH DAVID H TRUSTEE
SKIPPING TRUST 70% C/O KOCH INDUSTRIES KOCH INDUSTRIES C/O
3674 DEL MONTE DR 4111 E 37TH ST N PO BOX 2256
HOUSTON,TX 77019 WICHITA, KS 67220 WICHITA, KS 67201
LAUDER LEONARD A 2013 REV TRUST MARCUS STEPHEN J SAGEBRUSH LODGE LLC
767 FIFTH AVE 40TH FL PO BOX 1709 767 FIFTH AVE 40 FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10153 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10153
SANT ASPEN RESIDENCE TRUST VINE CHLOE WALNUT CREEK RANCH LLC
MARALYNN VIERSEN SANT TRUST 1802 S UINTA WY 4520 MAIN ST STE 1060
PO BOX 702708 DENVER,CO 802312914 KANSAS CITY, MO 64111-1816
TULSA, OK 741702708
WOOD DUCK REALTY CORP WURTELE CHRISTOPHER C TRUST ZILKHA SELIM K TRUST
450 PARK AVENUE 3RD FLOOR 38 MEHA PL 750 LAUSANNE RD
NEW YORK, NY 10022 PAIA, HI 967799738 LOS ANGELES, CA 90077
-1
r
.?T
J.
c p tr DOOR HEIGHT: 7'-8" DOOR HEIGHT: 7'-0"
r f `. t FIRST STORY ELEMENT: 9'-8" FIRST STORY ELEMENT: 7'-10"
►, R STREET-FACING WINDOWS: DO NOT EXIST BETWEEN 9'-12' STREET-FACING WINDOWS: DO NOT EXIST BETWEEN 9'-12'
l ' -,4e
SEE EXHIBIT B '"k
FOR EXISTING _
CONDITIONS • slip
�
1 i P
l
D00 HEIGHT: 8'-0" R HEIGHT: 7'-9"
' ,•; .
�' •'rsi 1 r '' ?k' ST STORY ELEMENT: 10-10"(HIGH PLATE HEIGHT) FIRST STORY ELEMENT: 7'-5"
+ 9-2 (LOW PLATE HEIGHT) STREET-FACING WINDOWS: EXIST BETWEEN 9'-12'
.4 ;r �_" STREET-FACING WINDOWS: EXIST BETWEEN 9'-12'
00 fthwaw�
s.
E F - - -
A�t R HEIGHT: 9'-2' DOOR HEIGHT: 9'-8'
FIRST STORY ELEMENT: 10'-6" FIRST STORY ELEMENT: 16'-0"(HIGH PLATE HEIGHT)
STREET FACING WINDOWS: EXIST BETWEEN 9'-12' 10'-2"(LOW PLATE HEIGHT)
STREET-FACING WINDOWS: DO NOT EXIST BETWEEN 9'-12'
F
G
OR HEIGHT: 10'-0'
FIRST STORY ELEMENT: 12'-3'
STREET-FACING WINDOWS: EXIST BETWEEN 9'-12'
825 ROARING FORK REMODEL
ASPEN, CO
pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING EXHIBIT A : NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
i ns eiol$25.1]00 Ol11T070/020 e2000,08 null 00010 0 la m a 020ia '., wa9;a� os OCTOBER 15,2013
G CITY OF ASPEN
CI'f`t bF ASPEN `�� EXEMPT FROM WR='
EXEMPT FROM HRETT
RE N®, DATE REP, PTO
DATE V i�Sf d J, Recording Reques�fed by and
r When Recorded Return to:
Koch Family Management 473437
cn Page: i of 3
4111 E.37 Street North
Wichita,KS 67220 1111111111111.00 10/15/2002 01:22P
Attn: Erin Cyphers SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16D 0.00
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED, made to be effective as of this 1 st day of October, 2002, between Charles
G. Koch and Elizabeth B. Koch, as joint tenants, of the said County of Sedgwick and State of
Kansas ("Grantor"), and Charles G. Koch, Trustee of the Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate
Trust, u/t/a dated April 11, 1997, whose legal address is 4111 E. 37'h Street North, Wichita,
Kansas, Attention: Koch Family Management, of the said County of Sedgwick and State of
Kansas ("Grantee"):
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN
DOLLARS ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted,
bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and
confirm, unto the Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, all the real property,
together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the said County of Eagle County
and State of Colorado described as follows:
A Tract of Land situated in the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 12, Township 10
South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of Aspen, Colorado,
and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of Lot 10, Second Aspen Company
Subdivision in said City of Aspen, Thence North 70°23' East 140.18 feet to the
Southeasterly Corner of said Lot 10 and being the point of intersection with the
Westerly Boundary line of Lot 16 of said Section Aspen Company Subdivision;
Thence along said Westerly Boundary line South 23°00' East 85.85 feet to the
point of intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of Roaring Fork Road;
Thence 22.21 feel along the arc of a curve to the left and said right-of-way line
having a radius of 1467.46 feet; Thence South 65°16' West 117.79 feet along said
right-of-way line to the Southeasterly Corner of Lot 15 of said Second Aspen
Company Subdivision; Thence North 23°00' West 98.20 feet along the Easterly
Boundary line of said Lot 15 to the Point of Beginning.
AND HISTORICALLY DESCRIBED AS:
A Tract of Land in Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian being more formerly described as Lot 3 in Block 89 and parts
of Lave Avenue and Maroon Avenue in Hallams Addition in and to the City and
Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Said above Tract being
now located in and being part of the Aspen Company Subdivision and being
#112392
473437
Page: 2 of 3
10/15/2002 01:22P
SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 D 0.00
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on Street Right of Way line as Platted and recorded in the
Pitkm County Recorders Office whence the Northeast Corner of Lot 6, Block 3,
Aspen Company Subdivision bears South 02 040' West 56 feet, said point being
the same as the Southeast Corner of Lot 14, Second Aspen Company Subdivision;
Thence South 70°23' West 140.1 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Lot 10;
Thence South 23°00' East 98.00 feet along the Easterly line of Lot 15, Second
Aspen Company Subdivision to the Point of Beginning.
also known by street and number as:
825 Roaring Fork Road
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto
belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and
remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and
demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained
premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances,
SUBJECT, however to all easements, covenants, restrictions and reservations now of
record and subject to all taxes and assessments, general and special, not now due and payable,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the
appurtenances, unto the Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, his
heirs and assigns, do covenant and agree that they shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER
DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee.
and Grantee's successors and assigns, against all and every person or entity claiming the whole
or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor, except as hereinabove stated. The singular
number shall include the plural, the plural and the singular, and the use of any gender shall be
applicable to all genders,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth
above.
CHARLES G. KOCH
ELIZABETH B. KOCH
C/
473437
Page: 3 of 3
STATE OF KANSAS ) 10/15/2002 01:22P
ss: SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 D 0.00
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
r`Lh
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of October, 2002,
by Charles G. Koch.
Witness my hand and official seal.
MARSHAA.DOWEL.L
NOTARY PUBLIC
i MASt.E� � d
Notary Public
My commission expires: tb�a�f b
STATE OF KANSAS )
ss:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 9)Lh day of October, 2002,
by Elizabeth B. Koch.
Witness my hand and official seal. MARSHA A.DOWELL
NOTARY PUBLIC
_ STATE OF KA SA
A t.E 26
Notary Public
My commission expires:
poss wg
November 1", 2013
Justin Barker
Community Development
Re: 825 Roaring Fork Road Remodel
To Whom It May Concern:
We've attached the required forms as required by the Pre-Application Conference Summary and Land
Use Application to apply for a Residential Design Standard Variance for the 825 Roaring Fork Road
Remodel project.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Nicholas Chan, LEED AP,Architect
Email: nchan @billposs.com
Phone: 970.925.4755
Poss Architecture + Planning P.C.
X
Nov 0 1 2013
605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (t) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Justin Barker, 429.2797 DATE: 9/30/2013
PROJECT: 825 Roaring Fork Road
REPRESENTATIVE: Nick Chan & Julie Maple, Poss Architects
REQUEST: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variances
DESCRIPTION:
The applicant requests three (3) residential design standard variances (Land Use Code Section):
1. Entry door taller than 8 ft. (26.410.040.D.1.a)
2. First story element taller than 10 ft. (26.410.040.D.2)
3. Street-facing windows between 9-12 feet above the finished floor. (26.410.040.D.3.a)
The subject property is 825 Roaring Fork Road and is located in the Second Aspen Company
Subdivision. The property is zoned R-15 and contains a single-family house. The proposal
includes exterior changes to the front entryway and window replacement.
Staff will accept an application for administrative review. The following two criteria are used in
determining the appropriateness of a variance:
a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which
the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the
context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the
proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a
broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or
b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints.
If staff cannot support administrative approval, application can be made to the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience:
Land Use App:
http://www.aspenpitki n.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%2Oland%20
use%20app%20form.pdf
Land Use Code:
http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-
Land-Use-Code/
Relevant Land Use Code Section(s):
26.306 Common Development Review Procedures
26.410 Residential Design Standards
Review by: Community Development for determination of completeness
Public Hearing: Not required
1
Planning Fees: $650 flat fee for two (2) hours of work. If the application is required to go to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for review, all time beyond two (2) hours of
work will be billed at $325 an hour.
Total Deposit: $650
To apply, submit 2 copies of the following information:
❑ Completed Land Use Application.
❑ Signed fee agreement.
❑ Total deposit for review of the application.
❑ Pre-application Conference Summary.
❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that
states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on
behalf of the applicant.
❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to
occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed
to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all
mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and
demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application.
❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of
how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the
development application.
❑ Existing and proposed plans and elevations.
❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is
based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations
that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
2
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET
THE CITY of ASPEN
Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to
the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Included in this package are the following attachments:
1. Development Application Fee Policy,Fee Schedule and Agreement for Payment Form
2. Land Use Application Form
3. Dimensional Requirements Form
4. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/Submittal Requirements Key
5. General Summary of Your Application Process
6. Public Hearing Notice Requirements
7. Affidavit of Notice
All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal
Code. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk's Office on the second
floor of City Hall and on the internet at www.aspenpitkin.com , City Departments,City Clerk,
Municipal Code,and search Title 26.
We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in
the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete
application can be fully described. Also,depending upon the complexity of the development
proposed,submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to
determine accuracy,insufficiencies,or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials
and Staff time.
Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the
Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key
provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development,it cannot possibly replicate the
detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in
this package,we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the
applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations.
Land Use Review Fee Policy
The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or
deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted.
A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable
amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral
departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative — meaning an application with
multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable.
A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required.
Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on
the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community
Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates.
A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner.
Hourly billing shall still apply.
All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for
Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of
Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee.
The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the
processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at
the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the
processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is
covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no
additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for
by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be
due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval.
Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and
recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon
conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director
accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time
of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director
accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation.
The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid
invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of
1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be
assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain.
All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements
and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits
already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or
issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made.
The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use
application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing
the owner(e.g. a contract purchaser)regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties.
COMMUNrry DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agreement to Pay Application Fees
Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("Pit") and
Property The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Phone No.: 316-828-5222
Owner("I"): Real Estate Trust u/t/a April 11,1997
Email: ruth.williams @kochind.com
Address of 825 Roaring Fork Road Billing Koch Family Management
Property: Aspen, CO 81611 Address: P.O. Box 2256
(subject of (send bills here) Wichita, KS 67201
application)
understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications
and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand
that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application.
For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these
flat fees are non-refundable.
$,0 flat fee for Select Dept $Q flat fee for Select Dept
.......___
$ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ p flat fee for Select Review
For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed
project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application.
understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is
impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable
legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full
The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not
returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30
days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services.
I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment.
I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment
of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs
exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the
processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated.
$ 650 deposit for z hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time
above the deposit amount will be billed at$325 per hour.
$ 0 deposit for 0 hours of Engineering Department staff time.Additional time above the deposit
amount will be billed at$265 per hour.
City of Aspen: Property Owner:
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director Name:Charles Koch
City Use: Trustee
Fees Due:$650 Received:$
Janwn-y, 2013 City ot'Aspen 1 130 S. Gdena St. 1 (970)920-5090
PROJECT: ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION
Name: 825 Roaring Fork Road Remodel
Location: Subdivision:SECOND ASPEN COMPANY Lot: 16-A Section: 12 Township: 10 Range: 85 LAND IN SEC 12-10-85 DESC AS
LOT 3 IN BLK 89&PARTS OF LAKE AVENUE&MAROON AVENUE IN HALLAM ADD TO CITY&TOWNSITE N
Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) 273512104016 OF ASPE
APPLICANT•
Name: The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trust,U/T/A dated April 11, 1997
Address: 4111 E 37th St.N Wichita,KS 67220
Phone#:
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name: Poss Architecture+Planning
Address: 605 E.Main Street Aspen,CO 81611
Phone#: 970.925.4755
TYPE OF APPLICATION:(please check all that apply):
❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use
❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment
❑ ) ❑ Text/Map Amendment
Special Review
❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA
❑ ESA—8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA
Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment)
Mountain View Plane
❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/
Expansion
Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment
❑ Conditional Use El Other:
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings.uses previous approvals,etc.
Single Family Residence 6 —6,000 SF
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc.
Window and door replacement and minor roof remodel.Existing footprint and use to remain the same
Have you attached the following? FEES DuE:$650
N
CRPre-Application Conference Summary
Attachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement
Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form
Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards
3-D Model for large project
All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model.
' s
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project: 825 Roarinig Fork Remodel
Applicant: The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trust, U/T/A dated April 11, 1997
Location: 825 Roaring Fork Road
Zone District: R-15
Lot Size: 12,868 SF
Lot Area: 12,868 SF
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes.Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed:
Number of residential units: Existing. Proposed.•
Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed:
Proposed%of demolition(Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS: N/A
Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed.•
Principal .height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed:
Access. bldg. he' t: Existing: Allowable: Pro se&
On-Site parking: fisting. Required.• Proposed.
% Site coverage: Exist* • Required: Proposed.
%Open Space: Existing: Requir . Proposed.•
Front Setback: Existing: uired: Proposed.
Rear Setback: Existing: Requir • Proposed.
Combined F/R: Existin Required: Proposed.•
Side Setback: sting: Required. Proposed.•
Side Setb Existing: Required: Pr sed.
Combi Sides: Existing: Required.• Propose .
D' nce Between Existing Required: Proposed.•
Buildings
Existing non-conformities or encroachments:NONE
Variations requested:NONE
1
ATTACHMENT 4-MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the in second column. These numbers correspond to the key on page 9. For multiple
reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collated packets. All drawings must include
an accurate graphic scale
Type of Review App.Submission Requirements Process Type(See Process
See ke on a e 9. Number of Required Submittal
8040 GREENLINE REVIEW Descri Description in Aft.5) Packets
1-7,8-10,35 P&Z 10
8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION 1-7 8-10,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2
STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7,8, 10, 11, 12,35 P&Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE axed
STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION on Location
(B 2 for 0 Admin.,10 for P&Z
1-7,13, 11, 12,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2
'LAM I,A>zE BLUFF REVIEW 1-7, 13, 14,35
MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE P&Z 10
1-7, 15, 16,35 P&Z 10
CONDITIONAL USE 1-7,9, 17 P&Z 10
SPECIAL REVIEW* 1-7,Additional Submission Req.depend P&Z
0o nature of the Special Review Re nest. 10
SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19,20,21,35 P&Z,AND CITY COUNCIL 20
EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19,20,21,35 CITY COUNCIL 10
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7 22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2
LOT SPLIT 1-7,22 CITY COUNCIL 10
CODE AMENDMENT 1-4,7,23 P&Z,AND CITY COUNCIL 20
WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7, 16 24 25 26 27 35 ADMIN.OR P&Z 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z
SATELITE DISH OVER 24"IN 1-7 ADMIN.OR P&Z 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z
DIAMETER
RES.DESIGN STANDARDS 1-7, 9,28,29,30 P&Z OR DRAG 10
VARIANCE
GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7,Additional Submission Req.depend ADMIN.,OR P&Z,AND/OR CC 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z,20 for P
on nature of the Exemption Request (BASED ON EXEMPTION TYPE &Z and CC
CONDOMINIUIVQZATTON 1,31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2
PUD 1-7,32,33,35 CONCEPTUAL—P&Z,AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC(Submit
LODGE PRESERVATION PUD ' —P&Z,AND CC Separately for Final PUD Review)
1-7,35 P&Z,AND CC 20
PUD AMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN.,OR P&Z,AND/OR CC 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z,20 for P
SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA ASED ON AMENDMENT TYPE &Z and CC
1-7,35 SPA it CONCEPTUAL—P&Z,AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC(SubmFINAL-P&Z,AND CC Separately for Final SPA)
AMENDMENT TO SPA 1-7 ADMIN.,OR P&Z AND CC 2 for Admin.,20 for P&Z and CC
(BASED ON SIGNIFICANCE OF
TEMPORARY USE AMENDMENT
j-� 7PR ,4 R CC(BASED ON 2 for Admin., for City Council
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT TION TIME
1-7,9 AP&Z(BASED ON 1F 2 for Administrative Review
THL MEETS REVIEW
REZONING NDARDS
j-� Z AND CC 20
DIMEN SIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1-7,34 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9
VARIANCE
* Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements.
**A pre-application conference with a Planner should be conducted prior to submitting any land use application. Please call 920-5090 to
schedule a pre-application conference.
ATTACHMENT 4-CONT'D-SUBMITTAL KEY
1.Land Use Application 7ofthe 12. Accurate elevations(in relation to
Applicant's name,addree mean sea level)of the lowest floor, subdivision.The contents of the plat shall
number, contained withid including basement,of all new or be of sufficient detail to determine
by the applicant stating th , substantially improved structures;a whether the proposed subdivision will
and telephone nume verification and recordation of the actual meet the design standards pursuant to representative authorized o acon ehalf elevation in relation to mean sea level to Land Use Code Section 26.480.060(3).20.
of the applicant. which any structure is constructed;a Subdivision GIS Data.
demonstration that all new construction or
2. The street address and legal substantial improvements will be 21. A landscape plan showing location,
description of the parcel on which anchored to prevent flotation,collapse or size, and type
development is proposed to occur. lateral movement of any structure to be features. °f proposed landscape
constructed or improved;a demonstration
3. A disclosure of ownership of the that the structure will have the lowest 22. A subdivision plat which meets the
parcel on which development is proposed floor,including basement,elevated to at terms of this chapter,and conforms to the
to occur,consisting of a current certificate least two(2)feet above the base flood requirements of this title indicating that no
from a title insurance company, or elevation,all as certified by a registered further subdivision may be granted for
attorney Iicensed to practice in the State of professional engineer or architect. these lots nor will additional units be built
Colorado,listing the names of all owners
of the property, and all mortgages, ithout receipt of applicable approvals
gages 13. A landscape plan that includes pursuant to this chapter and growth
judgments,liens,easements,contracts and native vegetative screening of no less than management allocation pursuant to
agreements affecting the parcel, and fifty(50)percent of the development as Chapter 26.470.
demonstrating the owner's right to apply viewed from the rear(slope)of the parcel.
for the Development Application. All vegetative screening shall be 23. The precise wording of any
maintained in perpetuity and shall be proposed amendment.
4.An 8 1/2"x 11"vicinity map locating replaced with the same or comparable
the subject parcel within the City of material should it die.
Aspen. 24. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of
one(I")inch equals ten(10')feet or one
14. Site sections drawn by a registered 0") inch equals twenty (20') feet,
5. A site improvement survey including architect, landscape architect, or including before and"after" photographs
topography and vegetation showing the engineer shall be submitted showing all (simulations) specifying the location of
current status of the parcel certified by a existing and proposed site elements, the antennas,support
registered land surveyor, licensed in the to of slo Pport structures,transmission
P pe, and pertinent elevations buildings and/or other accessory uses,
State of Colorado. (This requirement, or above sea level.
any part thereof, may be waived by the access,parking,are fences,signs,lighting,
Community Development De landscaped areas and all adjacent land
the project is determined not to wan-ant a development,including any of the rooftop uses within one-hundred fifty(150')feet.
survey document.) equipment and how it will be screened. deSuch plans monstrate compliiancerwith the Review
6. A site plan depicting the proposed 16. Proposed elevations of the Standards of this Section.
layout and the project's physical development,including any rooftop 25. FAA and FCC Coordination.
relationship to the land and it's equipment and how it will be screened.
surroundings. Statements regarding the regulations of
the Federal Aviation Administration
17. A sketch plan of the site showing (FAA) and the Federal Communications
7. A written description of the existing and proposed features which are Commission(FCC).
proposal and a written explanation of relevant to the review.
how a proposed development complies 26. Structural with the review standards relevant to the 18. One(1)inch equals four hundred professional engineer licensed Integrity Report theom a
development application. (400) feet scale city map showing the State of Colorado.
location of the proposed subdivision, all
8. Plan with Existing and proposed adjacent lands owned by or under option 27. Evidence that an effort was made to
grades at two-foot contours,with five-foot to the applicant,commonly town locate on an existing wireless
intervals for grades over to(10)percent. landmarks,and the zone district in which telecommunication services facility
the proposed subdivision and adjacent site including coverage/interference
9. Proposed elevations of the development properties are located.
analysis and capacity analysis and a
brief as
10.A description of proposed 19. A plat which reflects the layout of s ccessaor no succtess.ther reasons for
construction techniques to be used. the lots,blocks and structures in the
proposed subdivision.The plat shall 28. Neighborhood block plan at
11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain be drawn at a scale of one(1)equals one I"=50' (available from City Engineering
line and the high water line. hundred(100)feet or larger.Architectural Department) Graphically show the front
scales are not acceptable. Sheet size shall portions of all existing buildings on both
be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six sides of the block and their setback from
(36)inches.If it is necessary to place the the street in feet. Identify parking and
plat on more than a one(1)sheet,an index front entry for each building and locate
shall be included on the first sheet. A any accessory dwelling units along the
vicinity map shall also appear on the first alley. (Continued on next page.)
sheet showing the subdivision as it relates
. the rest of the city and the street
Indicate whether any portions of the 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the
houses immediately adjacent to the location, height, type and luminous
subject parcel are one story (only one intensity of each above grade fixture.
living level). Estimate the site illumination as measured
in foot candles and include minimum,
29. Roof Plan. maximum, and average illumination.
Additionally, provide comparable
30. Photographic panorama. Show examples already in the community that
elevations of all buildings on both sides of demonstrate technique,specification,and/
the block,including present condition of or light level if they exist.
the subject property. Label photos and
mount on a presentation board
31. A condominium subdivision
exemption plat drawn with permanent ink
on reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall be
twenty-four(24)inches by thirty-six(36)
inches with an unencumbered margin of one
and one-half(1 1/2)inches on the left hand
side of the sheet and a one-half(1/2)inch
margin around the other three(3)sides of
the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 26.480.090.
32. A description and site plan of the
proposed development including a
statement of the objectives to be achieved
by the PUD and a description of the
proposed land uses,densities,natural
features,traffic and pedestrian circulation,
off-street parking,open space areas,
infrastructure improvements,and site
drainage.
33. An architectural character plan
generally indicating the use,massing,
scale,and orientation of the proposed
buildings.
34. A written description of the variance
being requested.
rt
Project: 825 Roaring Fork Road Remodel
Representative: Nick Chan & Julie Maple, Poss Architecture + Planning
We are requesting three Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variances for the following
residential design standards (Land Use Code Section):
1. Entry door taller than eight (8) feet (26.410.040.D.1.a)
2. First story element taller than 10 ft. (26.410.040.D.2)
3. Street-facing windows between 9-12 feet above the finished floor. (26.410.040.D.3.a)
Refer to exhibit A for a map of the neighborhood that illustrates the context of this project. The
door heights (item 1), first story element (item 2), and street-facing window heights (item 3) are
noted for each adjacent property in exhibit A.
Refer to exhibit B (A203) for the existing elevation of the property.
Please consider the following explanation of the context and existing conditions for the requested
variances:
1. Entry door taller than eight (8) feet (26.410.040.D.1.a):
Of the adjacent properties illustrated in exhibit A, 3 properties (E, F, and G) out of 7
doors exceed eight (8) feet. The existing elevation (exhibit B) shows the door heights
exceeding eight (8) feet. Due to the fact that half of the properties shown in both exhibits
A and B do not comply with this part of the residential design standard
(26.410.040.D.1a), we believe that this standard is not in context with this
neighborhood.
In addition the abovementioned context where half of the properties do not comply, the
scale and mass of the existing house would benefit from a taller door. The ridge of the
roof directly behind this first story element is 30'-8" tall. A taller door would provide a
better proportion with the existing mass of the residence.
2. First story element taller than 10 ft. (26.410.040.D.2):
Of the adjacent properties illustrated in exhibit A, 3 properties (E, F, and G) out of 7
properties clearly exceed the ten (10) foot height limit. Property "C" complies with the
lower plate height, but exceeds this limit on the higher plate height. The existing
elevation (exhibit B) complies with this height limit. Due to the fact that half of the
properties shown in both exhibits A and B do not comply with this part of the residential
design standard (26.410.040.D.2), we believe that this justifies granting a variance for
this standard.
In addition the abovementioned context where half of the properties do not comply, the
scale and mass of the existing house would benefit from a taller first story element. As
noted in item #1, the ridge of the roof directly behind this first story element is 30'-8"
tall. A taller first story element would provide a better proportion with the existing mass of
the residence.
3. Street-facing windows between 9-12 feet above the finished floor. (26.410.040.D.3.a):
Of the adjacent properties illustrated in exhibit A 4 properties (C, D, E, and G) out of 7
have windows that span between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above finished first floor.
The existing elevation (exhibit B) also has windows that span between nine (9) and twelve
(12) feet above finished first floor. Due to the fact that more than half of the properties
shown in both exhibits A and B do not comply with this part of the residential design
standard (26.410.040.D.3.a), we believe that this justifies granting a variance for this
standard.
In Summary: all three of the requested variances relate to the same proportional
relationship of the remodeled entry to the existing massing of the residence. The
applicant attests that existing neighborhood is predominantly out of context with the
proportions identified in these Residential Design Standards as more than half of the
properties do not comply. The applicant appeals to the planning staff to grant a variance
to (26.410.040.D.1.a), (26.410.040.D.2) and (26.410.040.D.3.a) to improve the
proportion of the entrance to the existing massing of the 30'-8" tall gabled roof it
projects from.
{ Ll CIT EN
OF ASP
CITY'OF ASMN EXEMPT FROM WR='
EXEMPT FROM HRE-(° DATE REP, NO
DATE RE+ NO.
i�� � Recording Req es�fed by and
1 When Recorded Return to:
Koch Family Management 473437
1n Page: 1 of 3
4111 E.37 Street North
Wichita,KS 67220 10/15/2002 01:22P
Attn: Erin Cyphers SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 D 0.00
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED, made to be effective as of this 1st day of October, 2002, between Charles
G. Koch and Elizabeth B. Koch, as joint tenants, of the said County of Sedgwick and State of
Kansas ("Grantor"), and Charles G. Koch, Trustee of the Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate
Trust, u/t/a dated April 11, 1997, whose legal address is 4111 E. 37" Street North, Wichita,
Kansas, Attention: Koch Family Management, of the said County of Sedgwick and State of
Kansas ("Grantee"):
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN
DOLLARS ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted,
bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and
confirm, unto the Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, all the real property,
together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the said County of Eagle County
and State of Colorado described as follows:
A Tract of Land situated in the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 12, Township 10
South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of Aspen, Colorado,
and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of Lot 10, Second Aspen Company
Subdivision in said City of Aspen, Thence North 70°23' East 140.18 feet to the
Southeasterly Corner of said Lot 10 and being the point of intersection with the
Westerly Boundary line of Lot 16 of said Section Aspen Company Subdivision;
Thence along said Westerly Boundary line South 23°00' East 85.85 feet to the
point of intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of Roaring Fork Road;
Thence 22.21 feet along the arc of a curve to the left and said right-of-way line
having a radius of 1467.46 feet; Thence South 65°16' West 117.79 e along said
right-of-way line to the Southeasterly Corner of Lot 15 of said Sec
Company Subdivision; Thence North 23°00' West 98.20 feet along the Easterly
Boundary line of said Lot 15 to the Point of Beginning. NOV 0 1 2013
AND HISTORICALLY DESCRIBED AS: ,t-=r`
r
A Tract of Land in Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian being more formerly described as Lot 3 in Block 89 and parts
of Lave Avenue and Maroon Avenue in Hallams Addition in and to the City and
Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Said above Tract being
now located in and being part of the Aspen Company Subdivision and being
#112392
473437
Page: 2 of 3
10/15/2002 01:22P
SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 D 0.00
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on Street Right of Way line as Platted and recorded in the
Pitkin County Recorders Office whence the Northeast Corner of Lot 6, Block 3,
Aspen Company Subdivision bears South 02 040' West 56 feet, said point being
the same as the Southeast Corner of Lot 14, Second Aspen Company Subdivision;
Thence South 70°23' West 140.1 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Lot 10;
Thence South 23°00' East 98.00 feet along the Easterly line of Lot 15, Second
Aspen Company Subdivision to the Point of Beginning.
also known by street and number as:
825 Roaring Fork Road
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto
belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and
remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and
demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained
premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances,
SUBJECT, however to all easements, covenants, restrictions and reservations now of
record and subject to all taxes and assessments, general and special,not now due and payable,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the
appurtenances, unto the Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, his
heirs and assigns, do covenant and agree that they shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER
DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee.
and Grantee's successors and assigns, against all and every person or entity claiming the whole
or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor, except as hereinabove stated. The singular
number shall include the plural, the plural and the singular, and the use of any gender shall be
applicable to all genders,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth
above.
CHARLES G. KOCH
� 3
ELIZABETH B. KOCH r`
i
NOV 0 1 2013
CVV y
473437
STATE OF KANSAS ) 10/15/2002 01:22P
ss. SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 15.00 D 0.00
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Cl day of October, 2002,
by Charles G. Koch.
Witness my hand and official seal. _
MARSHA A.DOWELL
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF S
��.2 atC� 't;2c 11 Ml ARM.Exp.
d
Notary Public
My commission expires:
STATE OF KANSAS )
ss:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of October, 2002,
by Elizabeth B. Koch.
Witness my hand and official seal. MARSHA A.DOWELL
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF KA SA
&Appt.Exp.?b
Notary Public
My commission expires: 1U�ao�O
Nov 01 2013
/ r
r j.,RRA r4 ..RI
TITLE COMPANY
of the rockies
132 W.Main Street,Suite B
Aspen,CO 81611
Phone:(970)920-9299 Fax: (970)927-8288
www.titlecorockies.com
OWNERSHIP & ENCUMBRANCE REPORT
& INVOICE
Prepared Republic Title of Texas Date: November 7,2013
for: Attn: Chase Evans
2626 Howell Street Order: 0704153 O&E
10th Floor Ref:
Dallas,TX 75204
Phone:214-754-7780 Fax:972-516-2511
'PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION AND--OWNERSHIP:
Legal Description: A Tract of Land Situated in the SE 1/4 of the NE 114 of Section 12,Township 10 South,
Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian,City of Aspen,Colorado,and being more fully
described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of Lot 10,Second Aspen Company Subdivision in
said City of Aspen,
Thence North 70*23' East 140.18 feet to the Southeasterly Corner of said Lot 10 and being
the point of intersection with the Westerly Boundary line of Lot 16 of said Aspen Company
Subdivision;
Thence along said Westerly boundary line South 23*00'East of 85.85 feet to the point of
intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of Roaring Fork Road;
Thence 22.21 feet along the arc of a curve to the left and said right-of-way line having a
radius of 1467.46 feet;
Thence South 65*16' West 117.79 feet along said right-of-way line to the Southeasterly
Corner of Lot 15 of said Second Aspen Company Subdivision;
Thence North 23*00'West 98.20 feet along the Easterly boundary line of said Lot 15 to the
Point of Beginning.
AND HISTORICALLY DESCRIBED AS:
A Tract of Land in Section in Section 12,Township 10 South,Range 85 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian being formerly described as Lot 3 in Block 89 and parts of the Lave
Avenue and Maroon Avenue in Hallams Addition in and to the City and Townsite of Aspen,
County of Pitkin,State of Colorado.Said above Tract being now located in and being part of
the Aspen Company Subdivision and being described as follows:
Beginning at the a point on the Street Right of Way line as Platted and recorded in the Pitkin
County Recorders Office whence the Northeast Corner of Lot 6,Block 3,Aspen Company
Subdivision bears South 02*40'West 56 feet,said point being the same as the Southeast
Comer of Lot 14,Second Aspen Company Subdivion;
Thence South 70*23'West 140.1 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Lot 10;
Thence South 23*00'East 98.00 feet along the Easterly line of Lot 15,Second Aspen
Company Subdivion to the Point of Beginning.County of Pitkin,State of Colorado
Property Address: 825 Roaring Fork Rd,Aspen,CO 81611 County: Pitkin,Colorado
Schedule/Parcel#: R0 0 79 641 273 51 21 040 1 6
Owner's Name(s): Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trust u/t/a dated April 11,1997
TITLE,ABSTRACT r
Warranty Deed from Whipple&Brewster Corporation to Charles G.Koch and Elizabeth B.Koch,recorded on
October 6,1992 at Recpetion#349342.
Warranty Deed from Whipple&Brewster Corporation to Charles G.Koch and Elizabeth B.Koch,re-recorded on
October 22,1992 at Reception#349960 to correct Legal Description.
Special Warranty Deed from Charles G.Koch and Elizabeth B.Koch to Charles G.Koch,Trustee of the Charles and
Elizabeth Kock Real Estate Trust,u/t/a dated April 11,1997,recorded on October 15,2002 at Reception#473437.
Nothing Further of Record
Note: This report covers Pitkin County,Colorado Real Estate Records
Through November 7,2013,
Service B�end Ecpeemdar!n Calnrodn far:£ogle,Ga�eld,Grnnd,Plrkin arrd Swnndr CmnrRer.ryirnired Coverage:Jackson,Lake,Park and Roux Counder)
Loca11—1 r:A—I&.per Creek Basalt,Breckenridge,G-*,-d it,t rPark(Ck,1 g Semlces..noble in Aspen and G1 —d Springs).
CHARGES.FOR THIS REPORT AND-DOOUM ENTS'ATTACHED
-Description of Charge Amount Qty Total
Written O&E $100.00 1 $100.00
Please return one copy of this report with your remittance Total Due: $1 00.00
a able to Title Company of the Roc ktes
Disclaimer., This report reflects the results of a search of the county records posted to the above described real estate only,and
does not necessarily reflect involuntary liens or other matters which might be disclosed by a search on the individual owner's or
other names shown hereinabove.The Title Company of the Rockies makes no warranty regarding the accuracy of the information
herein provided,and further, shall not be liable for any loss incurred by reason of the information reported In this report.
THE DOCUMENTS INCLUDED WITH THIS REPORT ARE THE BEST COPIES AVAILABLE
Service BepondEzpecsarian is Calowdo for.Engle,Ga�e(d.Gwnd,Pirkin and Sumrnlr Cowrrfes.ryirnieed CosYmge:Jackson,Lake.Park mid Boure Comuie
Lacasioru Irt:AnmdBeaver Creek,Barals,Breckenridge,GranGy,and ivnter Park(C(osing Services mailaG(e in Aspur and Glernwad Spring).
-
#349342 10/06192 M52 Ree 810.00 BK 690 PO 5193
= Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc 8265.00
GENEg .WARRANTY DEED
:) 2
� N A •.
p r¢ WHIPPLE & BREWSTF1t CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, $161 The m w `
E x @x Whipple-Brewster Corporation,whose address is 121 S.Galena,Aspen,Colorado 81611,for
the consideration of Ten Dollars(510.00)and other good and valuable consideration,in hand ,• ,
e paid,hereby sells and conveys to CHARLES G•KOCH and ELIZABETH B.KOCH,as joint <I
tenants whose street address is Koch Industries,Attn: Ruth Williams,4111 Fast 37th Street m i
K. North,Wichita,Kansas 67220,the following real property in the County of Pitkin,State of Y
Colorado: ' (
A r 4 I.
" m a Please see Exhibit"A"attached hereto and made a part hereof,
4 9k
m H`��
w. c; ,r t ti
o a also known by street and number as:825 Roaring Fork Road,City of Aspen, Rii« r
N County of Pitkin,State of Colorado 81611, a + s
with all its appurtenances,and warrants the title to the same,subject to and except for: * r"�r'
0 4
1. General taxes for 1992 and thereafter payable in 1993 and thereafter; 1i
r 1
,. 2• Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom,should '
} C the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises,as reserved in the United States
vl
Patent recorded in Book 55 at Page 2. s.
x, ALL REFERENCES BEING TO THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF PTTKIN COUNTY,
i •
fi J COLORADO.
r Signed this �� day of October 1992.
" V WHIPPLE&BREWSTER CORPORATION-:'
a Colo rad rorporation yjj, ;
ria By./ 1
rte eorge .Wtupp a 1dent
r�
STATE OP COLORADO )
m: ) ss.
COUNTY OF PTTfwd ) r 7
"r The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this bxa day of October 1992,
8 g
by George S.Whipple as the President of Whipple&Brewster Corporation, a Colorado
4 Corporation. 1 2
Witness my hand and official seal. ftrh t
s - My commission expires: 4.13•°.6 V•,
12 vxt
(SEAL)
No blic
. F Tess: S33
A.p<o Ceto.,uo Ste 1 I.rm,M
ti
r -iX „
yy it w
y i
C
�` 7�� �}i�-e1 ., (4 Ark t -1P`�0.� �9ky x143+''-' zr-�-i,se r^''s"-.k� r�: �LLC3k•. 8
4349342 10/06192 13:52 Rec $10.00 BY. 690 PB SB4
-�� Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $265.00 1 ' -
i
m '
A Tract of Land Situated in the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 12,
Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City or
Aspen, Colorado, and being more fully described as follows: z4�r
Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of Lot 10, Second Aspen Company
Subdivision in said City of Aspen,
Thence North 70 23' East 140.18 feet to the Southeasterly Corner ofrk �G
said Lot 10 and being the point of intersection with the Westerly
Boundary line of Lot 16 of said Second Aspen Company Subdivision) S�T Px
Thence along said Westerly boundary line South 23'00' East 85.85 feet -
to the point of intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of xt k
Roaring Fork Road; r
Thence 22.21 feet along the arc of a curve to the left and said right- `
of-way line having a radius of 1467.46 feet;
cn Thence South 65'16' Wes 117.70 feet along said right-of-way !ins to
r the Southeasterly Corner o= Lot 15 of said Second Aspen Connany
Subdivision; the Easterly boundary lice of
Thence North 23'00' West 98.20 _eet along ``
said Lot 15 to the Point of Beginning. k
;N' AND HISTORICALLY DESCRIBED AS:
A Tract of Land in.Section is Section _2
Township 10 South, Range 85
West of the Sixth Principal Meridian being formerly described as Lot 3
in Block 89 and parts of Lave Avenue and Maroon Avenue in Hal?ams
Add ion and to the City and Townsite o`_ aspen, Countv of kin,
State of Colorado. Said shove Tract being now located in and being n
! a
part o_ the Aspen ComparY Subdivision z*.d 'ne_ac described as =ol_oas: jd
= k eeginaing at a point on Street Right of Way line as Platted and
- recorded in the Pitkin county Retarders O'__'ice whence the Northeast
Corner Of Lot 6, Block 3, aspen Company subdivision bears South 02'40'
West 56 feet, said point being the same as the Southeast Corner of Lot
1
14, Second Aspen Company Subdivision; _
Thence South 70'23' West 140.1 feet to the Southwest Corner pr said :.otr
101
Thence South 23'00' East 98.00 feet alonc the Easterly line of Lot 10, b.
;= Second Aspen Company Subdivision to the Saint of Be in x
x n
`Mini, COUNTT OF PITAIN, r
STATE OF COLORADO t
t' 4
:�I n'F VSO S
'U J }
8
g i
�•_.xx
r:
T' N\ !p t1i 1.�• rx
��y
#349342 10/06/92 13.52 Rec $10.00 BK 690 PD 583
'_"-}+t •Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc !265.00
....0 M 7[
• n� GENERAL WARRANTY DEED 1 a tg+
t 6 rc WHIPPLE& BREWSTER CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, aWa The a"0
M Ed
_ Whipple-Brewster Corporation,whose address is 121 S.Galena,Aspen,Colorado 81611,for
ti the consideration of Ten Dollars($10.00)and other good and valuable consideration,in hand ,° z
o paid,hereby sells and conveys to CHARLES G.KOCK and ELIZABETH B.KOCH,as joint n r
y tenants whose shut address is Koch Industries,Attn: Ruth Williams,4111 Fait 37th Street 0 sp ,
North,Wichita,Kansas 67220,the fallowing real property in the County of Pitkin,State of
M ^` Colorado:
H
�r
na Please see Exhibit'A'attached hereto and made a part hereof, r
w u y n k t,
a also known by street and number as:825 Roaring Fork Road,City of Aspen, �• '
County of Pitldn,State of Colorado 81611, ID t
a
A with all its appurtenances,and warrants the titre to the same,subject to and except for. i
Q,
1. General taxes for 1992 and thereafter payable in 1993 and thereafte_^,
2. Rignt of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom,should
the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises,as reserved in the United States
Patent recorded in Book 55 at Page 2.
ALL REFERENCES BEING TO THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF PITKIN COltNTY, ,
v COLORADO.
Signed this dad day of October 1992.
WHIPPLE&BREWSTER CORP ORATION
` a Coloradyicorporadon �'4/.i _': a
N By: a
° Eotge/9.Whtpp a^f rdent tr M o
0
STATE OF COLORADO ) `3N' $
Ss. O L
COUNTY OF PITIUN
O O U
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before mr.this 6r1 day of October 1992, y
by George S.Whipple as the President of Whipple&Brewster Corporation, a Colorado
- H y corporation. n c
.O � � L
o Witness my hand and official seats
°H w
My commission expires: 4.13.#6 •�1 •� a s �
v��8i� N 1:
~ (SEAL) z a: b�". o i
No blic
' ress: 533 1.P 4tiy� a m
�-r '^e,u, a# N x-a.�rLl sr•t �.;L+Fr�rh��.-�•� .C�1-• .. I fi; � ., .;� �a -I
k
gp'p
r
IY 18
,� yiYi r 4"eR „t' 47y��'1 r ?Z j•e*; 1r
F yy $ Y,
pb,} r�y,. ✓` 11 `�
iF349342 10/06/92 13:52 Rec $10.00 BK-690 PG 384
1•* �; ..Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $265.00
ErdIBIT 'A' - -
- A Tract of Land Situated in the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 12, :,.'.
Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of
Aspen, Colorado, and being more fully described as follows:
a•.
Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of Lot 10, Second Aspect Compaay
Subdivision in said City of Aspen,
Thence North 70.23' East 140.18 feet to the Southeasterly Corner of
said Lot 10 and being the point of intersection with the Westerly
Boundary line of Lot 16 of said Second Aspen Company Subdivision;
Thence along said Westerly boundary line South 23'00' East 85.85 feet
to the point of ittersec--ion with the Northerly right-of-way line of ;
2 Roaring Fork Road;
j Thence 22.21 feet along the arc of a curve to the left and said right-
of-way line having a radius of 1467.46 feet; ':'i:
t ...:Thence South 65'16' West 1_7.79,.feet along said right-o way line to -the Southeasterly Corner of Lot 15 or said Second Aspen Como
2 Subdivision;
-:y Thence North 23100' West 98.20 :!set along.the Easterly boundary line o_ _
4
said Lot 15 to the Point of Beginning.
AND HISTORICALLY DESCRIBED AS:
'A.Tract of Land in Section in Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 �
`West of the Sixth Principal Meridian being former ly described as Lot 3
in Block 89 and parts of Lave Avenue and Maroon Avenue in Hallams p
'Addition in and to the City and Townsize of Aspen, County of Pitkin, _
xl State of Colorado. Said above Tract being now located in and being
:,:par_ of the Aspen Company Subdivision and being described as :-ollows:
-.;.Beginning at a point on Street Right o_: Way line as Platted and '
recorded in the Pitkin County Recorders O__ics whence the Northeast „
- -'Corner of Lot 6, Block 3, Aspen Company Subdivision bears South 02'40'
west 56 feet, said point being the same as tae Southeast Coraer of Loz
14, Second Aspen Company Subdivision;
'Thence South 70.231 West 140.1 feet to the Southwest Corner g_ said Lot _
10;
Thence South 23.00' East 98.00 feet along the Easterly line-of Lot 15,
Second Aspen Company Subdivision to the Point of Beginning. 'k ,
4 COUNTY OF PITKIN, r
STATE OF COLORADO
M349960 10/22/92 14:31 Rec $10.00 HK 692 PG 266 l..
.Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 re;
t
1 i'xa
P.
mom
7..
r.
t
< }f I •
X;ITY bF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN
EX
EXEMPT FROM HRETEXEMPT FROM WRBTT
DATE REP. NO.
DATE 1R11EH. � (q 151 O-X M k
►xyi)��aa RecordtngReques by and
When Recorded Return to:
Wichi a 7S 6 oN t IIIIII IIII)IIIIII VIII VIII IIIII�(IIII III VIII IIII III) 4 9 34 002 01:22P ///
Attn:Erin Cyphers SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 18,00 D 0.00
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED,made to be effective as of this 1st day of October,2002,between Charles
G. Koch and Elizabeth B. Koch, as joint tenants, of the said County of Sedgwick and State of
Kansas("Grantor"),and Charles G.Koch,Trustee of the Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate
Trust, u/t/a dated April 11, 1997, whose legal address is 4111 E. 37' Street North, Wichita,
Kansas, Attention: Koch Family Management, of the said County of Sedgwick and State of
Kansas("Grantee"):'
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN
DOLLARS ($10.00),the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,has granted,
bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and
confirm, unto the Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, all the real property,
together with improvements,if any,situate,lying and being in the said County of Eagle County
and State of Colorado described as follows:
A Tract of Land situated in the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 12,Township 10
South,Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian,City of Aspen,Colorado,
and being more fully described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of Lot 10,Second Aspen Company
Subdivision in said City of Aspen,Thence North 70°23'East 140.18 feet to the
Southeasterly Corner of said Lot 10 and being the point of intersection with the
Westerly.-D oundary -of_Lot.1.6-of_said,Section_Aspen-Company-Subdivision;---------
Thence along said Westerly Boundary line South 23°00'East 85.85 feet to the
point of intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of Roaring Fork Road;
Thence 22.21 feel along thE•are of a curve to the left and said right-of-way line
having a radius of 1467.46 feet;Thence South 65°16'West 117.79 feet along said
right-of-way line to the Southeasterly Comer of Lot 15 of said Second Aspen
Company Subdivision;Thence North 23°00'West 98.20 feet along the Easterly
Boundary line of said Lot 15 to the Point of Beginning.
AND HISTORICALLY DESCRIBED AS:
A Tract of Land in Section 12,Township 10 South,Range 85 West of the Sixth
Principal Meridian being more formerly described as Lot 3 in Block 89 and parts
of Lave Avenue and Maroon Avenue in Hallams Addition in and to the City and
Townsite of Aspen,County of Pitkin,State of Colorado. Said above Tract being
now located in and being part of the Aspen Company Subdivision and being
4112392
i
IlillllVIIIIIIIIIIIiIIlliIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIII�IIIII lII 1 15 002 01:22P
SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 16.00 D 0.00
described as follows:
Beginning at a point on Street Right of Way line as Platted and recorded in the
Pitkin County Recorders Office whence the Northeast Comer of Lot 6,Block 3,
Aspen Company Subdivision bears South 02°40'West 56 feet,said point being
the same as the Southeast Corner of Lot 14,Second Aspen Company Subdivision;
Thence South 70°23'West 140.1 feet to the Southwest Comer of said Lot 10;
Thence South 23°00'East 98.00 feet along the Easterly line of Lot 15,Second
Aspen Company Subdivision to the Point of Beginning.
also known by street and number as:
i
825 Roaring Fork Road
i
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto
belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and
' remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and
demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained
premises,with the hereditaments and appurtenances,
SUBJECT, however to all easements, covenants, restrictions and reservations now of
record and subject to all taxes and assessments,general and special,not now due and payable,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described,with the
appurtenances,unto the Grantee,and Grantee's successors and assigns forever. The Grantor,his
heirs and assigns,do covenant and agree that they shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER
DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee;
and Grantee's successors and assigns,against all and every person or entity claiming the whole
or any part thereof,by,through or under the Grantor,except as hereinabove stated. The singular
number shall include the plural,the plural and the singular, and the use of any gender shall be
applicable to all genders,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth
above.
CHARLES G.KOCH
ELIZABETH B.KOCH
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 478437
STATE OF KANSAS ) I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII IIII 10/1 3 02 3
SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO 10/15/2002 01:22P
)SS: R 18.00 D 0.00
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of October,2002,
by Charles G.Koch.
Witness my hand and official seal.
MARSHAA.DOWELL
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF
Notary Public
i
i My commission expires: 161abjDa
i
i
STATE OF KANSAS )
ss:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
i
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Qday of October,2002,
by Elizabeth B.Koch.
Witness my hand and official seal. MARSHA A.DOWELL
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF
Notary Public
My commission expires: lblabloa
OR°Oa x BBO.6
--------
\\
__ -LAI=9F KOCB
L4NDS OF WARCUS PER SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED�tEH�TON 5480797
(LOT 11,SECOND ASPEN COMPANY SUBDIVISION) ` _\\`\ x ^'
7885------------ - m/NB a®4,$bm
(LOT 10,SECOND ASPEN COMPANY SUBDIVISION) 'V
B]5 ROARING FORK ROAD -78B5- -865 ROARING FORK ROAD C I x
FOUND INTERSECTION MONUMENT'7TH k' `` Ba2T Ep\ g
AT THE INTERSECTION DF 7TH kFRANCIS ----------- ��\ 7 �\ 9P' Op / x>B
ELEVATION OF ALLUM DISC=7906,41 2 ' f ? 111
®gSPR B��B� 'I`_-- 9 ��\\�,A'PcF \\\ \ N� 'IBaY n // (87yJS9 '`/
1 T Q
END.5/8'REBAR W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP O9 J 07886.5 soa'B PY'e. �6 \ ®7884.2 \ + \
`5529030(HELD POSITION) BB ,� O",p. \ l N�
6
ELEVATION OF TOP CAP=]882.53' SS BO •7888.1 5'ASP ®6 064 \q 7"SPR 1 '1 BB35 iS �.�
J} AAy 6"SPR ,yS ®]888.5 �,,� m QF7.•p Pa,
ry�Oy O 4Y SR8& PQY�` O 7884
i 07885.3�� �6y ®78888 10.P �6\ ®b\ a \\ 4'ASP®J8 ®J� ®3•RBJ/ /xJ `// 1>xJ 1 ` �` \_
YJF1-T 7'SPR `®> "1 p. 6'SPR O n ®'I P`F (L]B ® 5.�4 J
\ q 7885--- T_�B �'1-__ x 6 86.1 ®78 5 3 > ASP 4 '> 882.1'R-C- 0 1 z e( ,$S l '
--- - 1 4ia"ASP 6•S B.BBa \ \ _
_ +76as.7 1 e6
6•A9' --_-___- S-70"23'00• W`��, R- ® �"g a'JBes.° �ya05.1® 'N q��4' ®JTj✓<,�P_ �Y'ZRe 1 \ �..,n. ..,.-.,.�+..-..,sSv--:y. -
q\A�mJ,!2"yJ VW z 7874. SC CIE ITY MAPO+]81.3 T J _ --_- -AS?-_ > 8�( U x.7882.9 E /IV'q O RR E W - - 7 1 C BJS'S _ ' 8"ASP �y+7 14 -� Oo \ J N 9•SPR 7880-- mil°`- 23.3' pe 8'ASP ra; 7B81.s�\ _> aD e> X7875 6C AC1� 97881.4 x--9c A A 10 \ B y" Ss JJ > m + ,4.2
5'ASP -- ASP BB I A� O FO 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE CALCULATED BEARING N 36'09'32"E BETWEEN FOUND MONUMENTS AT THE
+ 8]8.9 _ _ B \� ZT I$r /om
\\ -- -- -- - _-{- WELL �- a__;- >B81 T�pf.l.a J,� Ayp/ a/ I / / O of SOUTHWE57 CORNER OF LOT 10.AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP
I ,B ��" �', / ''° _o ENTITLED"SECOND ASPEN COMPANY SUBDIVISION•RECORDED IN DITCH PLAT BOOK 2A AT PAGE 263
DUND CITY MONUMENT"CP I(,RR- , &>BB7 6 STONE PATIO 55,8' Ga0 �'r �g LAWN WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON.
AT THE INTERSECTION OF 6TH k�RANCIS (C�y+�,''{{gg JBB 5'T �O 8"ASP p \ g0 / / >8 �S
ELEVATION OF AILUM DISC=79D6.09' _2D?SPR `lJ ^CRO O I I .�- 2.1 STONE PATIO J�j, / F(>50 ym 2- THE SURVEY SHOWN HEREON IS BASED IN PART ON THE GENERAL WARRANTY DEEDS RECORDED OCTOBER 6,
\ _IL �' 1992 IN BOOK 690 AT PAGE 583,AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1,1992 IN BOOK 667 AT PAGE 680.
GM _
q2 8_9, 0 0�1 0m0 / �a }} THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT IN PART TO THE FOLLOWING:
5' \ �o'o �`� ^I��°> 23.5' LANDS OF KOCH ^ O ^ / /'�$ I x (AS ESTES IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED GENERAL WARRANTY DEEDS)
7876.1 0' 7876.8\ (PER DEED RECEPTION #473437) >B/ / /+ I I (>BJaB m3o rc A)RIGHT OF THE PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT OR REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM,SHOULD THE
RD o pRD \ > y I 72.0• 7881.2 °R 1J I ��'x SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED AS RECORDED IN BOOK 55 AT PAGE 2.
\ �11��� (UNDESIGRATED LOT WITHIN SECOND �GRO / / fBJa is�w g
\ 0787712�� < ASPEN COMPANY SUBDIVISION) 97881.7 > / / 1 ( 'J yon B)TERMS,CONDITIONS,AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS,RESERVATIONS,
o IR eASP BBi
\\ B'SP �� I (DITCH PLAT BOOK 2A PAGE 263) I GRO 5 / I o'��v AND COVENANTS AFFECTING SECOND ASPEN COMPANY SUBDIVISION,RECORDED IN BOOK 197 AT PACE 475.
i x ; _ ml FF736 LOT AREA 12,868 t SOFT. g82j \ I Izo a B)TERMS,CONDITIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 360 AT PAGE 466.
u {N o ti / 9 1 I 1 1 mm 5. BENCHMARK: ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE"CITY OF ASPEN DATUM NAND 88"
2-STORY RESIDENTIAL HOUSE ^\ �' / /�
Es�, +9876.5 '` 3 m 0� p I 1 ( JB x J o,o TOP OF ENCASED 3" BRASS DISC-GPS-9(R)"NEAR THE CENTER OF INTERSECTION OF WEST
> a 6"SPR wa I h W/BASEMENT ^� \ (>a.5 ({y�>a6 FRANCIS STREET AND NORTH SIXTH STREET ELEVATION-7906-09'FEET(PER MARGIN,PLS
78] o 8825 ROARING FORK RD. \ SURVEY GATED JULY 27,2010 FlLEO IN qTY ENGINEERS OFFICE(DIMENSIONS TO OUTSIDE FACE SIDING 'MNDOW WELL \ I J pm )
N ) / / + 8?9.5 IT B>a o 6. THE SITE SETBACKS SHOWN WITHIN THE PARCEL SHOWN ARE BASED ON A CITY OF ASPEN ZONING DESIGNATION
14"COT + 75.8/D VI X 8.8'1 O 02 11.8 26 J. I \ nv OF R-15. VERIFY WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN ZONING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.
m m +7875.8 EEESEER "L° m�.7• ei2s °e° F-�+- $'am`-- /1
GRD 1'COT
x 0 l I o n s�` PATM- SITE
+ 035' u 1hgo'T BAC ADK 1 �Br a
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:
W N GtD / N 14.6'�''` I L9' a 25.8' " 76 TIB11.5 / I'// I > .�-' \ "THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES TO CHARLES KOCH AND TO
�>J.B 0.75 B x>8 J e EAV� /31'g6O1 v �Bj THE CITY OF ASPEN THAT THE IMPROVEMENT AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TO WHICH
78]5.7 'emu �' �'o'�- >s 880.0 / �' ) �\ THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED,PREPARED BY THE UNDERSIGNED,A REGISTERED
GRD °..6 + RP4.1 GARAGE ^m4 I STONE PATI0IO, ° � - 'ulmro \S`y880- sBJyz I \
- 2 1 248, OOJ - _ ��B,6 O J SPR / ®JB \ a PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR,WAS ACTUALLY MADE BY INSTRUMENT SURVEY
B> + s.B 0]873.1 9 �'gg�� / ®> �JB a'y�p9J a / 6. J p> / / UPON THE GROUND; THE SURVEY AND THE INFORMATION,COURSES AND
o CC1yC?,z �7�8]03.1 q�J2 / 6"ASP /� +78731 ,Sb�m+ >BJS� 0.� 1 BJaB B" .;¢ k^�. /R I BS>SJ / / DISTANCES SHOWN THEREIN,INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,ALL SETBACK
]8]3.6 + -_._-_--._-_- _-- X076]3.1 J 'f3.1 / GRD 9Tao �y�- -1 SpN / Sn �0 e`Ri--/p PR /
,7 SPR __ fC JI�'EC- D E S • _ �y sB>Ja �� AND YARD LINES.ARE CORRECT; THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS,
/ STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE AS SHOWN,IF ANY".
1®1'3' OE STONE RETATN-IYAtL ®5 6 / 4•BJ> ®68S�R / )B J
\ ya}I + CONCRETE DRIVEWAY / /'Q 7874.1-•� J B> 9 -yr 0 f J 6*>B/ i
g'AS 1 e.8 \ >• BJ ,r > Ayy aJ 1 / sP FURTHER CERTIFY THAT SAID BUILDINGS,STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS ON SAID
\ / 01� / / N\`la°,r \.--------__ _ �R� B>�o-- / y/ R/ / PREMISES ON THIS DATE,FEBRUARY 28,2013,MARCH 6,2012,SEPT 12,2012 AND
78723 \ n +7872.8 _
�]B7J.0 CRO CONC .aPY� f 7873.D 38'3 0 / / \P -- -- .p> / 0 J /x JBJ / SEPT.2013,EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS,ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF
GM +7872.7 m= BJ �O GRO 0 7874. ®7875.2 \ 0]'-SPR +7875.4 THE PARCEL,EXCEPT AS SHOWN,THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE
fC?B G 78727 / / 5"ASP 8"SPR \ ®7876.4 _-.-b�SPR_- 0,6 7875.5 --- >B>� Su i///
cRD EC / o '^ I `•SPR-®7875.8 - SJ / R / $1� DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES,EXCEPT AS
/�Q'N 078V49 WISER --- i e'>B /1 INDICATED,AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY
\\ fcJ?t / Imp 7"SRjt __---------,($" - 6'y7J6�J EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL,EXCEPT
+®7874.4 \078 z-- >'8L �-�� ^S / R
/ 8]873.8 0 0 ]'ASP �' - gp-. ®]g73..1- �N _ - / AS NOTED. THE ACCURACY OF ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON IS
78]x] 5"6'ASP \ 7875'79'SPR _ - C�CL
--7•gsp BETTER THAN 1:15,000.
FWD.S/8"REBAR B'TRFE \ '107rySe ro� L \m ZSPR- --- 0� n�� 8"SPR �0 0 I' O.SW-,�0/ ��i BJO
_- OG S P ,(V 2 ®7873.4 0 7874.5 -i-787 T1 0 6 ® 73.4' �',R- _
ELEVATION OF Top REBAR=7871.6'\ ^Pqn -- -- ---- -----5'SPR-----5 O 9 wig p� ^ _ ® P -_ -�/ '/ T. DATED:-lIGIJ/!.J BV:
0]6]2.1 ---- n• TTT
/ 5"SPR y 9 \_ 9•SPR b 7B 72. �1 'I0 4+ 9" 2 i"
e e�' +7871.9 01 ,RB,�. 0(117.7 ) R=1487A6 SW-�7"- �+]869.6 4)0.0. 0 PF
0 ADO DOING ��6b SP 0 x- // 4 ROBERT C.HUTTON,PLS 824312
aee 117.78 _
e]n. S 6596'20" W®7 g72.4 'm y,eJ --®ie-i�.7 L=222 --- 3ASP __: -°- - �--
J 12_SP1i-.-- �!' So?9 i' _gP-R -(C-2Z2 1') +7869.8 OO --Q-��J 4"SPR - _ --"
RS-ej. 1 872. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY (7,.,11,�. p a9 > 't >6 0 B - //
B 8.6 - - _--_ -JB70.SRJ B - x F ORE STS=
10]872.1®7872.3 6'AS C ]8]16 _ J 0 7871E yg7p7 _ >as C'ASP S9 SPR --- `Sb.o '_ SPR -7870 + '_ -- -_ �� ��-- x> i fG?1 <Pj- " -fNO CHSL+"ON SSW ROCK_ x+' '. fCBJS `FNO-REC.COR. JB+f 8"-2\ AVEL SHOULDER 1 I EAaB1.11�/ i1{ ,y 24312 YY
1 R GRAVEL SHOULDER W B J
fPBJ(W W I -w
W -w E,esa.J
W w- s
A I� J 16 BI I /
o
BI
/
q J a
+771.6 ROARING FORk 'ROAD B3.41•
q g 7869.3 +7868
50' WDE R/W(PER 2AIPLATS 263) L
GL
50.0'R/w
yVV' I / 4g CORD DRIVEWAY E863.5/ i ONC SE >BSl
C CURB(FLUSH W/GRADE) fP /
I EABJO B
�BJIS CONCRETE DRIVEWAY fP J1.0
19.58' R=1417.48' L=142.90'
124. N 6576'00'E
R=33228' S 65'18''0000'W
Le91.84 ENO.5/8'REBAR W/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP
LEGEND
FOUND 0.1'SOUTHEASTERLY OF RIGHT OF WAY LINE
STN STONE SURFACE ELEVATION IMPROVEMENT AND PARTIAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
-
L1PN - ELEVATION ON MANICURED JAWN
EL - EDGE OF MANICURED LAWN OF THE LANDS OF KOCH
T/W - TOP N HALL ELEVATION DESCRIBED IN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
GRD - GROUND ELEVATION
EG - EDGE OF GRAVEL SURFACE RECORDED IN RECEPTION #473437 PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS
`°ND - °"��NT ASSESSOR #2735-121-04016)
GRAPHIC SCALE (
W.M. - WATER METER (825 ROARING FORK RD.)
-
TAE- - TELEPHONE$ELECTRICAL(UNDERGROUND)LINE
-G- - GAS LINE '
-
WATER LINE
W
EP - EDGE OF ASPHALTIC PAVEMENT ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO
PAVE - ASPHALTIC PAVIN G (IN FEET I SCALE: 1' = 10' DATE: JULY, 2007
GRVL - GRAVEL SURFACE I mee= 10 tE REVISED: SEPTEMBER, 2012
0 - EDGE OF DITCH/CREEK SEPTEMBER, 2013
QB"COT - COTTONWOOD TREE(DIAMETER O DBH)
0WSPR - SPRUCE TREE(DIAMETER O DISH) ROBERT C. HUTTON
OB"ASP - ASPEN TREE(DIAMETER O DISH) PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
O - SET 5/8'REBAR WITH YELLOW CAP(UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 725 CEMETERY LANE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
970 544-9952 SHEET 1 OF 1
JOB 5168-825B
poss
ARCHITECTURE+PLANNIN
r
- - _ -
00
- - o, 0 0
i
I
o
O �
O p o O
Q a
� , o d ,
O i
CID a '
------ — --_ - — CanaIn't
CV
� 3 q
;
O C, / �!
1
- - REARSETBACK
O
IN
I
1
! I 0936:013 RROGRESS SET
1
i
O
-- — ---
I
C
I
-°
4�.1�
00 i PROPOSED ROOF ° -
o — —-
- _ - — - - -- FRONT SEi ACK
o
— -r�
I
° ° o s o q _ - _- - _ 825 ROARING FORK ROAD
Z
00 o ---=---- - o -
0 0 �.
----
_ --— - _ o
o —-
10 V.I.F. .. — — _ _ __ _ _ .�,: ! y..
o L I
PROIECTNO:
21326.00
!
I
SHEET TITLE
PROPOSED
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
SCALE:
PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A105
® 1 SCALE 1/8 1-O
O 2011
Q poss
I
32—NEW HORIZONTAL WOOD ARCHITECTURE+PIMP 3 I
SIDING TYPE 1-REF 1/A501 33'NEW HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING
TYPE 2(TYPJ-REF 2/g501
O.ROOF
130'-8'
` ° k
— C—ua-l�,e
x� C
Iz I B.O.SOF10IT
119_ .
i s
c�
C
-' T.O.FIN 0 UPPER LEVEL
0•
r
00
r
r
3-
----e---- 23 °
oar t
° 0930=013 RROORFSS SET
1015-_013 PER,\(Ii
1 L615=013 ADMWISTRATIVE
I�ARIANCE
27—ALL PROPOSED WINDOWS ARE ORTHAGONAL(TYP) —I—T.O.FIN.®MAIN LEVEL
00'-0'
PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE 1/4 I 0
3
2
34—NEW HORIZONTAL WOOD 35—NEW HORIZONTAL WOOD 1
Y SIDING TYPE 2-REF 2/A501
SIDING TYPE 1-REF 1/A501
T.D.ROOF 825 ROARING FORK ROAD
130'-e'
�i 23 i
20 '_ S _
_B.O.SOFFIT
�et;
--- woo-
28
T.O.FIN 0 UPPER LEVEL
27—ALL PROPOSED WINDOWS ARE ORTHAGONAL(TYP) I PROJECT No:
21328.00
SHEET TITLE
PROPOSED BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
SCALE
C
PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION A203
SCALE 1/4 1 0 0 2011
DOOR SCHEDULE WINDOW SCHEDULE poss
DOOR D R FRAME DETAILS FIRE WINDOW FRAME SILt
MARK DOOR TYPE WIDTH H GHT THICKNESS TYPE HEAD JAMB SILL HARDWARE RATING NOTES MARK Type Mark WIDTH DETAILS HARDWARE WINDOW
003A A 9 ]o'-o• ]3/4• HEAD JAMB SILL GROUP HEIGHT NOTES ARCHITECTURE+NANNIN
003A D C 1 A 7-91/4' 10'-0'
9-0• 13/4'
0038 D 9'-0' 7'_0• 13/4' G
005 C 3'-D' 7'-0' 21/4' G 3
101A B 6'-0• 8'-0' 13'4' -41/2' S'-0'
D 5 L 6'-0• B&F
B A 6.-0. 8'-0' 13/4' 7'-b' q'.g• 7 0' B
104 B 6'-0' 7'-0' 13/4' D b
104 A q
134' E 7 - 01/2' 4'-81/2'
1/4 8 B 2'-
' 1/2' D
-0' 2
1O6A A 418' C 8•.p 134 D 7'-0' ID 1/8.
/
'
A 10 B 2'-93/4• 6'-101/8' 9'-4
11 7'-0' 3'-6' 9'-4 11/8 C
/8' C ......._
12 f 2'-11 1/2' 6'-10' 13'-3 5/8' C
GENERAL NOTES 13 D g•-p• 8'-0• D
7'-10•
14 F r-Elvz• 6'_l0•
1. ALL UNITS TOMEETFENESTRATIONU-FACTORAT PERI IR D TOS1,CLIMATE ZONE 15 I 8'-0' D
7&8.MANUFACTURER STICKER&SUBMITTAL DATA REQUIRED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE 8-D• 3'-6. 12•-11 1/2' C
16 E 5'-412' S'.p•
2. EXTERIOR FINISH:DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM. 17 D 4' 8'-6• D
-6• g.0' s�zR
IB D 9'-0' D
q'-6. S-0• 9' 0 D
3. NATURAL WOOD STAINED is
WALNUT FINISH. 19 fi'-0• 3' 0' i',vz ozrvza vrss ,ri vrorv.o zv.
20 E 12-51/2' C ConsWtant
4. PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING AS REQUIRED PER IRC,R308. 4 6• 4-6. 7'-5• D
21 G 2.-6. 5'-0'
NOTES, 22 H 6'-10' y_0' 8•-0' D
23 1 9'-0' C
6'-10' 4'-0' 13'-6• C
A. MOTORIZED SUNSHADE IN SURFACE MOUNTED VALENCE,COCO 1%OPENESS WEAVE. 24 G 2'-6' S'-0' 13
B. MANUAL SUNSHADE IN SURFACE MOUNTED VALENCE,COCO 1%OPENESS WEAVE. 25 G 5' • E E
2'-6' -0' 8'-26 G 2'-6' 5' 0
-0'
8'-
C. MOTORIZED SUNSHADE IN SURFACE MOUNTED VALENCE,COCO 10%OPENESS WEAVE 27 E 5'-0' 6'-0' 0• E
9'-0' A
A
D. MANUAL SUNSHADE IN SURFACE MOUNTED VALENCE,COCO 10%OPENESS WEAVE 9'-0•29 G 2'-6' 4'-8' 8' 6• A
30 E 4'-9.
E. MANUAL BLACK-OUT SHADES IN SURFACE MOUNTED VALENCE. 31 G -4 1/2' 8'-6• q
2' q'-g•
32 J 5'-0. 6.-6.
33 G 2'-41/2• 4'-8' 14.0' A
34 G 2.-6. 4'-8. 8'-6• A
35 1 8'-0• 3'-6'
36 G 2'-6' 4•-8' 13'-0• A
Issue.
Y
DP-30_013 PROGRESS SET
1015:013 PERMIT
1 10 52013 ADMIN'ISTFATIVE
FLIT
VARIANCE
-----------------
-----------
DOOR TYPE A DOOR TYPE B DOOR TYPE C DOOR TYPE D
F129 ALL WINDOWS ARE ORTHAGONAL(TYR) 825 ROARING FORK ROAD
J,- I
,-Fi �
00
WINDOW TYPE A WINDOW TYPE B WINDOW TYPE C WINDOW TYPE D WINDOW TYPE E WINDOW TYPE F
2 d 21329.00 NO
pp
�
y
11 m .l _ _ t i� ¢ r SHEET TITLE
WINDOW&DOOR TYPES&
�I ELEVATIONS
,F, L
11: SCALE:
�'e
A600
WINDOW TYPE G WINDOW TYPE H (D 2011 �
a WINDOW TYPE I WINDOW TYPE J WINDOW TYPE K
poss _ .
November 1", 2013
Justin Barker
Community Development
Re: 825 Roaring Fork Road Remodel
To Whom It May Concern:
We've attached the required forms as required by the Pre-Application Conference Summary and Land
Use Application to apply for a Residential Design Standard Variance for the 825 Roaring Fork Road
Remodel project.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Sincerely,
Nicholas Chan, LEED AP,Architect
Email: nchan @billposs.com
Phone: 970.925.4755
Poss Architecture +Planning P.C.
ReGRI/F
NOV 0I 2013
CITY OF,
L'IFt 0PY,EA1T
605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. CO 81611 (t) 970/925-4755 (f) 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET
THE CITY OF ASPEN
Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to
the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Included in this package are the following attachments:
I. Development Application Fee Policy,Fee Schedule and Agreement for Payment Form
2. Land Use Application Form
3. Dimensional Requirements Form
4. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/Submittal Requirements Key
5. General Summary of Your Application Process
6. Public Hearing Notice Requirements
7. Affidavit of Notice
All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal
Code. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk's Office on the second
floor of City Hall and on the intemet at www.aspenpitkin.com ,City Departments,City Clerk,
Municipal Code,and search Title 26.
We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in
the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete
application can be fully described. Also,depending upon the complexity of the development
proposed,submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to
determine accuracy,insufficiencies,or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials
and Staff time.
Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the
Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key
provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the
detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in
this package,we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the
applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations.
a, ;
NOV 01 2013
s iY ASHEN
1UNFIA D1
Land Use Review Fee Policy
The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or
deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted.
A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable
amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral
departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative — meaning an application with
multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable.
A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required.
Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on
the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community
Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates.
A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner.
Hourly billing shall still apply.
All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for
Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of
Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee.
The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the
processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at
the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the
processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is
covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no
additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for
by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be
due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval.
Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and
recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon
conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director
accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time
of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director
accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation.
The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid
invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of
1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be
assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain.
All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements
and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits
already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or
issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made.
The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs 69 fated with a land use
application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a progr ld an applicant representing
the owner(e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely etween a private parties.
COMMUNrry DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .
Agreement to Pay Application Fees
Anagreement between the City of Aspen("City")and
Property The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Phone No.: 316-828-5222
Owner("I"): Real Estate Trust u/t/a April 11,1997 Email ruth.williams @koehind.com
Address of 825 Roaring Fork Road Billing Koch Family Management
Property: Aspen, CO 81611 Address: P.O. Box 2256
(subject of (send bills here) Wichita, KS 67201
application)
understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance-No.-, Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications
and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. 1 understand
that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application.
For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these
flat fees are non-refundable.
$0 flat fee for Select Dept $0 flat fee for_Select Dept
$ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ p fiat fee for Select Review
For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed
project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I
understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. 1 understand and agree that it is
impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable
legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full.
The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not
returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30
days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services.
I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment.
agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment
of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs
exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the
processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated.
$ 650 deposit for 2 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time
above the deposit amount will be billed at$325 per hour.
$ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time.Additional time bb144e
amount will be billed at$265 per hour. : ,
City of Aspen: Property Owner: NOV 01 2013
4
0 , , .
Chris Bendon i
Community Development Director Name:Charles Koch
City Use: Trustee
Fees Due:$650 Received:$
Janmiry, 2013 City ol'Aspen 130 S. Galena St. 1(970)920-5090
ATTACHMENT 2—LAND USE APPLICATION
PROJECT:
Name: 825 Roaring Fork Road Remodel
Location: Subdivision:SECOND ASPEN COMPANY Lot: 16-A Section: 12 Township: 10 Range: 85 LAND IN SEC 12-10-85 DESC AS
LOT 3 IN BLK 89&PARTS OF LAKE AVENUE&MAROON AVENUE IN HALLAM ADD TO CITY&TOWNSITE OF ASPEN
Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) 273512104016
APPLICANT'
Name: The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trus U/T/A dated April 11, 1997
Address: 4111 E 37th St.N Wichita,KS 67220
Phone#:
REPRESENTATIVE'
Name: Poss Architecture+Planning
Address: 605 E.Main Street Aspen,CO 81611
Phone#: 970.925.4755
TYPE OF APPLICATION:(please check all that apply):
❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use
❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment
❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA
❑ ESA—8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA
Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment)
Mountain View Plane
❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/
Expansion
Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other:
❑ Conditional Use
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc.
Single Family Residence @--6,000 SF
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc.
Window and door replacement and minor roof remodel.Existing footprint and use to remain the same.
Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $650
® Pre-Application Conference Summary i4 s-
Attachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement NO
Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form ® j Z�13
Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review St, nd d
3-D Model for large project
All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model.
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project: 825 Roarinig Fork Remodel
Applicant: The Charles and Elizabeth Koch Real Estate Trust,U/T/A dated April 11, 1997
Location: 825 Roaring Fork Road
Zone District: R-15
Lot Size: 12,868 SF
Lot Area: 12,868 SF
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes.Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed:
Number of residential units: Existing: _ Proposed.•
Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed:
Proposed%of demolition(Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS: N/A
Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed.•
Principal . height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed:
Access. bldg. he' t: Existing: Allowable: Pro sed:
On-Site parking: isting: Required: Proposed:
% Site coverage: Existi • Required: Proposed:
%Open Space: Existing: Requir . Proposed:
Front Setback: Existing: uired: Proposed:
Rear Setback: Existing: Requir Proposed.•
Combined F/R: Existin • Required.• Proposed:
Side Setback: sting: Required.• Proposed:
Side Setb : Existing: Required.• Pr sed.•
Combi Sides: Existing: Required: Propose :
Di nce Between Existing Required: Proposed:
Buildings
Existing non-conformities or encroachments:NONE
Variations requested:NONE :, t
x>
10V 0
ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the in second column. These numbers correspond to the key on page 9. For multiple
reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collated packets. All drawings must include
an accurate graphic scale
Type of Review App.Submission Requirements Process Type(See Process Number of Required Submittal
See key on page 9. Description in Att.S) Packets
8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1-7,8-10,35 P&Z 10
8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION 1-7,8-10,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2
STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7,8, 10, 11, 12,35 P&Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE(Based 2 for 0 Admin.,10 for P&Z
on Location
STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION 1-7,8, 10, 11, 12,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2
HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW 1-7, 13, 14,35 P&Z 10
MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE 1-7, 15, 16,35 P&Z 10
CONDITIONAL USE 1-7,9, 17 P&Z 10
SPECIAL REVIEW* 1-7,Additional Submission Req.depend P&Z 10
on nature of the Special Review Request.
SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19,20,21,35 P&Z,AND CITY COUNCIL 20
EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19,20,21,35 CITY COUNCIL 10
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7,22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2
LOT SPLIT 1-7,22 CITY COUNCIL 10
CODE AMENDMENT 1-4,7,23 P&Z,AND CITY COUNCIL 20
WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7 16 24 25 26 27 35 ADMIN.OR P&Z 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z
SATELffE DISH OVER 24"IN 1-7 ADMIN.OR P&Z 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z
DIAMETER
RES.DESIGN STANDARDS 1-7,9,28,29,30 P&Z OR DRAC 10
VARIANCE
r GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7,Additional Submission Req.depend ADMIN.,OR P&Z,AND/OR CC 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z,20 for P
C% on nature of the Exemption Request (BASED ON EXEMPTION TYPE &Z and CC
oz ONIINIU1bIIZATION 1,31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2
-`0 PUD 1-7,32,33,35 CONCEPTUAL—P&Z,AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC(Submit
o FINAL—P&Z,AND CC Separately for Final PUD Review)
LOe PRESERVATION PUD 1-7,35 P&Z,AND CC 20
' w
Z.
PUD AMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN.,OR P&Z,AND/OR CC 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z,20 for P
(BASE D ON AMENDMENT TYPE &Z and CC
SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA 1-7,35 CONCEPTUAL—P&Z,AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC(Submit
SPA FINAL-P&Z AND CC Separately for Final SPA)
AMENDMENT TO SPA 1-7 ADMIN.,OR P&Z AND CC 2 for Admin.,20 for P&Z and CC
(BASED ON SIGNIFICANCE OF
AMENDMENT
TEMPORARY USE 1-7 ADMIN.OR CC(BASED ON 2 for Admin.,10 for City Council
DURATION TIME
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 1-7,9 ADMIN OR P&Z(BASED ON IF 2 for Administrative Review
THE PROPOSAL MEETS REVIEW
STANDARDS
REZONING 1-7 P&Z AND CC 20
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1-7,34 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9
VARIANCE
* Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements.
** A pre-application conference with a Planner should be conducted prior to submitting any land use application. Please call 920-5090 to
schedule a pre-application conference.
Cn
�+" W -M
jz
ATTACHMENT 4-CONT'D-SUBMITTAL KEY
1.Laud Use Application with 12. Accurate elevations(in relation to system in the area of the proposed
Applicant's name,address and telephone mean sea level)of the lowest floor, subdivision.The contents of the plat shall
number, contained within a letter signed including basement,of all new or be of sufficient detail to determine
by the applicant stating the name,address, substantially improved structures;a whether the proposed subdivision will
and telephone number of the verification and recordation of the actual meet the design standards pursuant to
representative authorized to act on behalf elevation in relation to mean sea level to Land Use Code Section 26.480.060(3).20.
of the applicant. which any structure is constructed;a Subdivision GIS Data.
demonstration that all new construction or
2. The street address and legal substantial improvements will be 21. A landscape plan showing location,
description of the parcel on which anchored to prevent flotation,collapse or size, and type of proposed landscape
development is proposed to occur. lateral movement of any structure to be features.
constructed or improved;a demonstration
3. A disclosure of ownership of the that the structure will have the lowest 22. A subdivision plat which meets the
parcel on which development is proposed floor,including basement,elevated to at terns of this chapter,and conforms to the
to occur,consisting of a current certificate least two(2)feet above the base flood requirements of this title indicating that no
from a title insurance company, or elevation,all as certified by a registered fiuther subdivision may be granted for
attorney licensed to practice in the State of professional engineer or architect. these lots nor will additional units be built
Colorado,listing the names of all owners without receipt of applicable approvals
of the property, and all mortgages, 13. A landscape plan that includes pursuant to this chapter and growth
judgments,liens,easements,contracts and native vegetative screening of no less than management allocation pursuant to
agreements affecting the parcel, and fifty(50)percent of the development as Chapter 26.470.
demonstrating the owner's right to apply viewed from the rear(slope)of the parcel.
for the Development Application. All vegetative screening shall be 23. The precise wording of any
maintained in perpetuity and shall be proposed amendment
4.An 8 1/2"a 11"vicinity map locating replaced with the same or comparable
the subject parcel within the City of material should it die. 24. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of
Aspen. one(1")inch equals ten(10')feet or one
14. Site sections drawn by a registered (1") inch equals twenty (20') feet,
5. A site improvement survey including architect, landscape architect, or including before and"after" photographs
topography and vegetation showing the engineer shall be submitted showing all (simulations) specifying the location of
current status of the parcel certified by a existing and proposed site elements, the antennas,support structures,transmission
registered land surveyor, licensed in the top of slope, and pertinent elevations buildings and/or other accessory uses,
State of Colorado. (This requirement, or above sea level. access,parking,fences,signs,lighting,
any part thereof, may be waived by the landscaped areas and all adjacent land
Community Development Department if 15. Proposed elevations of the uses within one-hundred fifty(150')feet.
the project is determined not to warrant a development,including any rooftop Such plans and drawings should
survey document.) equipment and how it will be screened. demonstrate compliance with the Review
Standards of this Section.
6. A site plan depicting the proposed 16. Proposed elevations of the
layout and the project's physical development,including any rooftop 25. FAA and FCC Coordination.
relationship to the land and it's equipment and how it will be screened. Statements regarding the regulations of
surroundings. the Federal Aviation Administration
17. A sketch plan of the site showing (FAA) and the Federal Communications
7. A written description of the existing and proposed features which are Commission(FCC).
proposal and a written explanation of relevant to the review.
how a proposed development complies 26. Structural Integrity Report from a
with the review standards relevant to the 18. One(1)inch equals four hundred professional engineer licensed in the
development application. (400) feet scale city map showing the State of Colorado.
location of the proposed subdivision, all
8. Plan with Existing and proposed adjacent lands owned by or under option 27. Evidence that an effort was made to
grades at two-foot contours,with five-foot to the applicant,commonly known locate on an existing wireless
intervals for grades over ten(10)percent. landmarks,and the zone district in which telecommunication services facility
the proposed subdivision and adjacent site including coverage/interference
9. Proposed elevations of the development properties are located. analysis and capacity analysis and a
brief statement as to other reasons for
10.A description of proposed 19. A plat which reflects the layout of success or no success.
construction techniques to be used. the lots,blocks and structures in the
proposed subdivision.The plat shall 28. Neighborhood block plan at
11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain be drawn at a scale of one(1)equals one 1"=50' (available from City Engineering
line and the high water line. hundred(100)feet or larger.Architectural Department) Graphically show the front
scales are not acceptable.Sheet size shall portions of all existing buildings on both
be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six sides of th 11 setback from
(36)inches.If it is necessary to place the a parking and
plat on more than a one(1)sheet,an index a for eadj b and locate
shall be included on the first sheet. A "any accessory dwelling units along the
vicinity map shall also appear on the first alle .t(GPotin�led�+�xt page.)
sheet showing the subdivision as it relates _ 1 l
to the rest of the city and the street
ot
� r
Indicate whether any portions of the 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the
houses immediately adjacent to the location, height, type and luminous
subject parcel are one story (only one intensity of each above grade fixture.
living level). Estimate the site illumination as measured
in foot candles and include minimum,
29. Roof Plan. maximum, and average illumination.
Additionally, provide comparable
30. Photographic panorama. Show examples already in the community that
elevations of all buildings on both sides of demonstrate technique,specification,and/
the block,including present condition of or light level if they exist.
the subject property. Label photos and
mount on a presentation board
31. A condominium subdivision
exemption plat drawn with permanent ink
on reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall be
twenty-four(24)inches by thirty-six(36)
inches with an unencumbered margin of one
and one-half(1 1/2)inches on the left hand
side of the sheet and a one-half(12)inch
margin around the other three(3)sides of
the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 26.480.090.
32. A description and site plan of the
proposed development including a
statement of the objectives to be achieved
by the PUD and a description of the
proposed land uses,densities,natural
features,traffic and pedestrian circulation,
off-street parking,open space areas,
infrastructure improvements,and site
drainage.
33. An architectural character plan
generally indicating the use,massing,
scale,and orientation of the proposed
buildings.
34. A written description of the variance
being requested.
N0 .1 01 2013
THE CITY OF ASPEN
Land Use Application
Determination of Completeness
Date: November 5, 2013
Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant,
We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number
and name assigned to this property is 0069 2013.ASLU —825 Roaring Fork Road. Your planner
assigned to the case is Justin Barker.
)�Your Land Use Application is incomplete:
Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing
your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed
above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the
land use application.
1) Proof of Ownership. Adequate proof of ownership can be in the form of a current
certificate from a title company title insurance company (or an ownership and
Encumbrance report), or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the
names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages,judgments, liens, easements,
contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to
apply for the Development Application. A warranty deed is not acceptable.
❑ Your Land Use Application is complete:
If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete
to begin the land use review process.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by
the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any
questions.
T CY o u,
ennifer h lan, Deputy Director
City of pen, Community Development Department
For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications:
Mineral Rights Notice Required New SPA New PUD
Yes No -G__ Subdivision, SPA, or PUD(creating more than 1 additional
lot)
GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing
Yes No74 Commercial E.P.F. Lodging
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Justin Barker, 429.2797 DATE: 9/30/2013
PROJECT: 825 Roaring Fork Road
REPRESENTATIVE: Nick Chan & Julie Maple, Poss Architects
REQUEST: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variances
DESCRIPTION:
The applicant requests three (3) residential design standard variances (Land Use Code Section):
1. Entry door taller than 8 ft. (26.410.040.D.1.a)
2. First story element taller than 10 ft. (26.410.040.D.2)
3. Street-facing windows between 9-12 feet above the finished floor. (26.410.040.D.3.a)
The subject property is 825 Roaring Fork Road and is located in the Second Aspen Company
Subdivision. The property is zoned R-15 and contains a single-family house. The proposal
includes exterior changes to the front entryway and window replacement.
Staff will accept an application for administrative review. The following two criteria are used in
determining the appropriateness of a variance:
a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which
the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the
context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the
proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a
broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or
b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints.
If staff cannot support administrative approval, application can be made to the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience:
Land Use App:
http://www aspen pitkin com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20
use%20app%20form.pdf
Land Use Code:
http://www aspenpitkin com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoninq/-ritle-26-
Land-Use-Code/
F,
Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): `'
26.306 Common Development Review ProceduRM 01 2013
26.410 Residential Design Standards
C!TY OF ASPEN
Review by: Community Development for determination of comple ems' - F
Public Hearing: Not required
1
Planning Fees: $650 flat-fee for two (2) hours of work. If the application is required to go to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for review, all time beyond two (2) hours of
work will be billed at $325 an hour.
Total Deposit: $650
To apply, submit 2 copies of the following information:
• Completed Land Use Application.
• Signed fee agreement.
• Total deposit for review of the application.
• Pre-application Conference Summary.
• Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that
states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on
behalf of the applicant.
• Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to
occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed
to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all
mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and
demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application.
❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of
how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the
development application.
• Existing and proposed plans and elevations.
• An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is
based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations
that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
. , ,.
NOV 01 2013
I�"�
`
- CF A�P
2