The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.110 Red Mountain Rd.0022.2014.ASLU 40 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0022.2014.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 072 13 002 PROJECTS ADDRESS 110 RED MOUNTAIN RD PLANNER SARA NADOLNY CASE DESCRIPTION STREAM MARGIN REPRESENTATIVE HAAS LAND PLANNING DATE OF FINAL ACTION 4.28.14 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 6.4.14 vp22 • Zoll,f.� Perin File Edit Record Navigate Farm Reports Format Tab Help —J Jump 1 � r . lid Main RouUn Status Fee Summa ons Routing Elstory Aspen Land Use PerqW010.2014ASILU Address`110 RED MOUNTAIN RD Apt/ o city ASPEN CO z 81611 0 lit Information x o Haster a R _. p o uti ng que; aslu07 Applied 0'120;2014 zPro Status pending Approved. "► Description ESA-8040 GREENLINE,STREAM MARGIN.HALLAM LAKE BLUFF,MOUNTAIN VIEW Issue += PLANE-EXEMPTION GosedlFin + ubmitted MITCH HAAS 925 4819 do Running 5 �' „03I15015 er 4111,111!111w Last name 110 VALHALLA.LLC Fast name CIO DAVID MORAY 9201 WILSHIRE BLVD#305 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 Phone ( 1 )274-7832 Address,. 70 scant . w Owii`erls i pp ibar'. �� ❑Contractor is applicant? Last name 1110VALHALLA,LLC First name 9201 WILSHIRE BLVD#305 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 Phone (310)274-7832 cult 29737 Andress Lender Last name First name Phone ( ) Address AspenGold5(server an 2! C 78- 3 a5(a7 612) 215-•0() AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: // Ka ✓��T1,u��(� �O _ Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, 24yl,a4, Sc (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this,-day of lykAA4 , 2000, by —�--� WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL My commission expires: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of asite-specific development plan,and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24,Article 68,Colorado Revised Statutes,pertain- ing to the following described property:,Parcel ID Notary Public #2737-072-13-002,Legally described as Amended Lot 2,According to the Second Amendment to Oden Stream Margin Review and Lot Line Adjust- ment Plat,commonly known as too Red Mountain KAREN REED PATT'ERS`ON Road,County A mini,State of Colorado. The ap- KAREN PUBLIC proval Margin grants Administrative Approval of Stream Margin Review Exemption related to the remodel of ATTACHMENTS: STATE OF COLORADO the single family residence on the site.For further information contact Sara meat y at the City of As- NOTARY ID#19964002767 pen Community Development Dept.,130 S.Gale- na St.,Aspen,Colorado,sara.nadolnyf�c;tyo- COPY OF THE PUBLICATION My Commission E 'res Februa 15,2016 1 faspen.com,(970)429-2739. � City of Aspen - ' Published in the Aspen Times on May 1,2014. [10148481] I DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. David Moray, 110 Valhalla, LLC, 9201 Wilshire Blvd Ste 305, Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address Amended Lot 2, According to the Second Amendment to Oden Stream Margin Review and Lot Line Adjustment Plat, commonly known as 110 Red Mountain Road, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The Applicant plans a remodel of the subject property, which includes the replacement of the current roof with an energy efficient roof, and the conversion/reconstruction of a two-car garage to a one-car garage. Top of bank has been established by the City Engineer for Hunter Creek with this application. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Administrative Approval for Stream Main Exemption per the Community Development Director on April 28, 2014. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) May 1, 2014 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) May 1, 2017 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 28th day of April, 2014, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Chris Bendon, Community Development Director Page 1 of 1 1111111111 IN IIII Print Date: Janice K. Vos Caudill Pitkin County Transaction#: 60420 4/28/2014 3:50:04 Clerk and Recorder Receipt#: 201402618 PM 530 East Main Street Cashier Date: 4/28/2014 3:50:02 PM Aspen, CO 81611 (PNADON) (970) 429-2707 www.PitkinClerk.org Customer Information Transaction Information Payment Summary DateReceived: 04/28/2014 Source Code: Over the (HAALAN) HAAS LAND PLANNING Counter LLC Q Code: Mail Total Fees $21.00 201 N MILL STREET#108 Return Code: Over the Total Payments $21.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 Counter Y Trans Type: Recording Agent Ref Num: 1 Payments IMN RIO CI IECK 3430 $21.00 1 Recorded Items .�� BK/PG: 0/0 Reception:609847 Date:412812014 R tf I _(APPROVAL) APPROVAI.... ANY 3:50:01 PM TYPl From: To: IRecording @ $11 for 1 pg and $5 for 2 or more pgs $1 Surcharge 3 $21.00 0 Search Items 0 Miscellaneous Items file:///C:/Program%20Files/RecordingModule/default.htm 4/28/2014 NOTICE OF APPROVAL For Stream Margin Exemption at Amended Lot 2, According to the Second Amendment to Oden Stream Margin Review and Lot Line Adjustment Plat, commonly known as 110 Red Mountain Road County of Pitkin, State of Colorado Parcel ID No.: 2737-072-13-002 APPLICANT: David Moray, 110 Valhalla, LLC 9201 Wilshire Blvd,#305 Beverly Hills, CA 90210 REPRESENTATIVE: Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning, LLC 420 E. Main St, Ste 10-B Aspen, CO 81611 SUBJECT & SITE OF 110 Red Mountain Road AMENDMENT: Stream Margin Review Exemption SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Exemption from Stream Margin Review for the remodel of a single-family home on the site. Specifically the applicant proposes to modify the existing two-car garage on the south end of the property and transform it into a one-car garage, and to replace the roof on the structure with an energy-efficient roof. A proposed project may available for a Stream Margin Review Exemption if the development meets the relevant review criteria, as found in Exhibit B, following. BACKGROUND: The subject parcel is part of the Oden Lot Split, and is zoned R-15A/PD. The site is located adjacent to Hunter Creek, a tributary of the Roaring Fork River, and therefore is subject to Stream Margin Review. No top of bank has been formally established for Hunter Creek. This review establishes the top of bank for this property by the City Engineer. The applicant received an Administrative Approval for Stream Margin Review Exemption in February 2014 to permit the reconstruction of a patio area surrounding the pool, involving a change to the landscape grading related to the development of a new access drive at the front of the residence (Approval included as Exhibit Q. STAFF EVALUATION: Per the application, the request is to permit a change to the existing garage that will cause the garage to be further from the Hunter Creek. By establishing the top of bank with the City Engineer, the proposed garage remodel will bring this development into compliance by maintaining the garage beneath the 45 degree angle drawn from top of slope, and keep the garage outside of the 15' setback from top of slope. The remodel will primarily RECEPTION#: 609847, 04/28/2014 at 1 03:50:01 PM, 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO maintain the existing footprint, and will not exceed the 10% allowable increase to the existing structure. The proposed remodel does not require the removal of any tree on the property. A building envelope has not been platting for the property, however, the existing garage on the north side of the property will be moved farther away from the high water line for Hunter Creek, and the building remains fully outside of the 100-year flood plain. Staff finds all necessary criteria to be met for a Stream Margin Review Exemption. The City Engineer has reviewed the application and includes the following requirements. The proposed redevelopment project must: 1. Follow the-Engineering Department's Design Standards and Urban Runoff Management Plan, and 2. Meet the requirements of the Notice of Approval for this site, dated February 14, 2014 (Exhibit Q. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for a Stream Margin Review Exemption, as noted above, to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the request with conditions. APPROVED BY: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director Date Attachments: Exhibit A: Site Plan (Recorded) Exhibit B: Review Criteria/Staff Findings(In file) Exhibit C: Prior Notice of Approval (In file) Exhibit D: Application 2 y w 1a nd'+Nb r oughtoon HUNTER CREEk ron os aL%� — 2019.N9j16 ox mawfMs _ 2014 01.08 2014.01.20�orvwucNs - - ei.«rnra�aarencx 2014,03.02 axuwat-xn ro- _. si«rsrm sEiw« co.corvemccnorvmaasrvn �e6 ox�w.,u Q w �,e w.,rexvwvE Exrxr , I RED MOUNTAIN ROAD �T RESIDENCE �Q. k 110 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD ASPEN,COLORA0081611 01, gH o�+/ll Y iwrcr vwo se�.ac . nt i e..a PROPOSED SITE SITE PLAN sROPORED SITEPWJ SCALE:I, =-, A1.1 A1.1 Exhibit B Review Critera 26.435.040.B. Stream Margin Review Exemptions The Community Development Director may exempt the following types of development within the stream margin review area: 1. Construction of pedestrian or automobile bridges, public trails or structures for irrigation, drainage, flood control or water diversion, bank stabilization, provided plans and specifications are submitted to the City engineer demonstrating that the structure is engineered to prevent blockage of drainage channels during peak flows and the Community Development Director determines the proposed structure complies, to the extent practical, with the stream margin review standards. Staff Response: This application does not involve the construction of any of the above- listed structures. Staff finds this criterion to be not-applicable. 2. Construction of improvements essential for public health and safety which cannot be reasonably accommodated outside of the "no development area" prescribed by this Section including, but not limited to, potable water systems, sanitary sewer, utilities and fire suppression systems provided the Community Development Director determines the development complies, to the extent practical, with the stream margin review standards. Staff Response: This application does not involve the construction of any of the above- listed structures. Staff finds this criterion to be not-applicable. 3. The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development provided the following standards are met: a) The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%). All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, a stream margin review by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and Staff Response: The proposed development does not exceed the 10%floor area of the existing structure. The remodel primarily uses the existing footprint of the building, and the roof replacement does not contribute to an increase in the building's floor area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b) The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code. Staff Response: The proposed development does not require the removal of any tree on the property. Staff finds this criterion to be met. c) The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development; 1 Staff Response: The proposed development will not be any closer to the high water line. In fact, the garage on the north side of the property will be moved farther away from the high water line for Hunter Creek. Staff finds this criterion to be met. d) The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and Staff Response: The recorded 1988 plat does show Lot I of the Oden Subdivision to have an established building envelope, however Lot 2 is absent of a building envelope. In absence of this building envelope, the development must meet the requirements found in Stream Margin review. The proposed development is actually further away from the Hunter Creek. Staff finds this criterion to bet met. e) The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100-year flood plan. Staff Response: The proposed remodel of the building remains fully outside of the 100- year flood plain. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2 RECEPTION#: 608135, 02/21/2014 at 03:56:26 PM, 1 OF 2, R $16.00 +i Janice K. Vos Caudill, kin County, CO 9)(h NOTICE OF APPROVAL For a Stream Margin Review Exemption 110 Red Mountain Rd. Amended Lot 2,According to the Second Amendment to Oden Stream Margin Review and Lot Line Adjustment Plat Parcel ID No.:273707213002 APPLICANT: David Moray,110 Valhalla LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Rowland and Broughton SUBJECT PROPERTY: 110 Red Mountain Road Amended Lot 2,According to the Second Amendment to Oden Stream Margin Review and Lot Line Adjustment Plat REQUEST: Stream Margin Review Exemption SUMMARY: The applicant has requested a Stream Margin Review Exemption to permit the redevelopment of landscape improvements. Specifically, the request is to reconstruct some of the patio surrounding the pool as well as landscape grading changes including development of a new access drive at the front of the house as shown in Exhibit A. A property may be available for a Stream Margin Review Exemption if the proposed development meets certain criteria(Exhibit B), STAFF EVALUATION: Per the application,the request is to permit the partial replacement of an existing feature,a patio surrounding a pool,which will be in the same footprint as the existing patio and therefore no closer to the high water line than the existing development. All other grading and development is along the south side of the house and is no closer to the high water line than the existing development.No tree is proposed to be removed within 100 feet of the from the high water line or the 100-year flood plain and the proposal does not add to the floor area to the existing structure or to the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations. DECISION: The Community Development Director rinds the administrative application for a Stream Margin Review Exemption as noted above to be consistent with the review criteria(Exhibit B)and thereby,APPROVES the request. APPR BY: Chris Bendon Date—++� Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A: Approved Site Plan(recorded) Exhibit B: Review Criteria(on file) Exhibit C: Application(on file) Page 1 of 1 CASE NUMBER A087-02 PARCEL ID# 2737-072-13001 t CASE NAME Oden Stream Margin Amendment & Lot Line Adjustment# PROJECT ADDRESS 110 Red Mountain Road PLANNER James Lindt I CASE TYPE Stream Margin Amendment and Lot Line Adju OWNER/APPLICANT Robert and Paul Stardoj REPRESENTATIVE Carlie Siemel and Sallie Golden DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12/09102 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION Plat Recorded BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 02/28/03 BY D Driscoll I I I i i November 7,.2002 Robert Oden C/o Carol Ann Kopf 606 E.Hyman Ave.. ASPEN/PITKIN Aspen,CO 81611 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RE: Lot 1,Oden Lot Split Dear Dr. Oden:. I am writing this letter as a follow up to our conversation this morning and to summarize the City ' Planning Department's position on the questions that Bob Stardoj asked about the development potential on Lot 1, of the Oden Lot Split. The questions expressed by Mr. Stardoj were related to the allowable floor area ratio (FAR) on the parcel, the growth management implications of developing the parcel with a single-family residence, and the possibility of constructing a voluntary accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on the site., Please see the responses below for the Community Development Staff's explanation to Mr. Stardoj's questions. Allowable FIoor Area: Based on the information that has been provided to our staff by Mr. Stardoj, we have calculated the current'allowable floor area (FAR),for Lot 1, of the Oden Lot Split as approximately 3,965 square feet. The FAR of 3,965 square feet has been calculated based on the lot size of Lot I prior to the approval of the Oden Lot Line Adjustment(plat is recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office at Book 61, Page 28) because the City of Aspen Land use Code does not allow for any development rights or FAR to be changed by virtue of a lot line adjustment approval. The above figure was determined by taking Lot 1's lot area of 31, 230 square feet, as was represented on the Oden Lot Split Plat (recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office at Book 20, Page.90), and subtracting 1,698 square feet of right-of-way (described as Area No.. 1 on Exhibit"A" of the document recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office at Book •579, Page 906) that was granted to Pitkin County by Dr. Oden in 1988. The above arithmetic yields a lot size of 29,532 square feet. Furthermore, pursuant to Section 26.575.020(0)of the City of Aspen Land Use Code, all lot area below the high water Iine of the river must be' subtracted from the lot size when calculating allowable FAR. Surveyor Jim Reeser calculated that Lot 1 of the Oden Lot Split contained about 1,403 square feet of lot area that was located beneath the mean high water line of the river(please see attached letter). Therefore, the 1,403 square feet of lot area located below the mean high water line was then subtracted from the 29,532 square feet of lot area to yield a figure of 28,129 square feet. Based on the lot area of 28,129 square feet and the R-15A zone district requirements, staff calculated an allowable FAR of 5,287 square feet. However, the lot also contains slopes in excess of 20% and is subject to slope reduction. Thus, staff calculated the slope reduction based on the worst-case scenario by subtracting 25% from the allowable FAR of 5,287 square feet. This yields an allowable FAR of 3,965 square feet. The FAR of 3,965 square feet is based on the current land use code requirements and is subject.to change. 130 SOUTH GALENA STREFT ASPEN,COLORAoo 81611-1975 PHONE 970.920.5090 FAx 470.920.5439 Printed w Recycled Paper i. Growth Management Implications: Lot 1 of the Oden Lot Split was approved in the County as part of a"density reduction lot split" that provided both a subdivision and a growth management approval. This differs from the City's process which only provides a subdivision approval, subject to compliance with the growth management exemption criteria. City lot splits are typically required to provide an ADU or a cash-in-lieu payment as a condition of the subdivision approval. Because the County's approval provided a growth management approval, no further growth management exemption is required for development of a residence on the vacant Lot#1. Voluntary ADU: As was mentioned in the Growth Management explanation above,the applicant is not required to construct an ADU to gain a Growth Management Quota System Exemption on Lot 1, of the Oden Lot Split. However, the owner may provide a voluntary ADU on the site if it is desired. Any ADU constructed on the site would have to meet the ADU design standards that are established in Section 26.520.050 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code and the unit would have to be deed restricted pursuant to the Aspen/Pitkin County Affordable Housing Guidelines. The information that was provided in this letter is based on current zoning requirements and is subject to change from time to time. Please let me know if you have further questions. I may be reached at 920-5095. Regards, r /James Lindt,Planner City of Aspen cc: Sarah Oates,City of Aspen Zoning Officer Bob Stardoj Oden Lot Line Adjustment Land Use File i September 26,2002 Robert Oden C/o Carol Ann Kopf 606 E.Hyman Ave. ASPEN'•P1TK1N Aspen,CO 81611 COMMUNrryDEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT RE: Lot 1,Oden Lot Split Stream Margin Review Applicability J Dear Dr.Oden: I am writing this letter as a follow up to our conversation this morning and to summarize the conclusion that was reached in regards to the applicability of the Stream Margin Review Process on the parcel of land that is described-as Lot 1,of the Oden Lot Split. It was concluded,that if all development that is proposed on the site is setback at least one hundred (1'00) feet, measured horizontally, from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and Hunter Creek,then a Stream Margin Review (including the specific review criteria listed in Land Use Code Section 26.435.040(C)).will not be required to be met to construct a single-family residence on the site. 'The high water line is to be determined by a surveyor that is licensed within the State of Colorado and shall'be visually verified by the City of Aspen Community Development Department to be accurate. At the time of building permit submittal, the applicant must show proof that all proposed development is entitely setback.at least one hundred(100)feet from the high water line of Hunter Creek. The City of Aspen Land Use•Eode defines development as follows:, Development-' The use'or alteration of land or land uses and improvements inclusive of, but not limited to: 1) the creation, division, alteration or elimination of lots; or 2) mining, drilling (excepting to obtain soil samples or to. conduct tests) or the construction, erection, alteration, or demolition of buildings or structures; or 3) the grading, excavation, clearing of land, or the depositor fill in preparation or anticipation offuture development, but excluding landscaping. The aforementioned proof may be in the form of overlaying the proposed development footprint and grading on a survey that delineates the high water line. Please let me`know if you' -have ^ further questions. I may be reached at 920-5095. Regards, ?arnes Lindt,Planner City of Aspen cc: Joyce Ohlson, Community Development Deputy Director Sarah Oates,City of Aspen Zoning Officers . Bob Stardoj .Oden Lot Line Adjustment Land Use file 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 81611-1975 PHONE 970,920.5090 FAx 970.9205439 Printed on Recycled Paper February 20, 2002 Francis Krizmanich Land Use Planning 79 Light Hill Road ASPEN•PITKIN Snowmass, CO 81611 Comww TY DEvadpmENT DEPARTMENT Ret Oden Property Dear Francis: The City has reviewed your letter and provides the following. It is hoped that this information will help your client decide whether pursuing the disconnection request is in his best interests. Commitments and Dedications. The Oden Family granted a fishing easement within the portion of Hunter Creek crossing their land in exchange for the County waiving park dedication fees. This commitment is part of the subdivision approval and the City acquired the obligation when the property was annexed in to the City. The City honors this commitment and will not assess park dedicatiorxstandards for development within this subdivision. The dedication of the fishing.easement was an action exclusive to the waiver of park dedication fees.and the Hunter Creek fishing easement does not create any other obligation.upon the City. Dr. Oden donated a portion of his property to the County for the purpose of improvements to Red Mountain•Road in 1988. No. references to FAR or development rights are contained in the donation documentation and there does not appear to be any connection between the dedication and the subdivision in the record or in any documentation pr6vided. The actual dedication language references commitments by the County to provide an appraisal of the subject land for tax purposes, some restoration work on the applicant's land, and- design, changes to the County's proposed improvements. The City assumes the County fulfilled these obligations. If not, the property owner should take appropriate action with the County. Building Envelope. The 1988 Oden Subdivision plat depicts a building envelope. The building envelope is subject to new laws of general applicability after the three-year period of statutory vested rights has expired. The City's Stream Margin Review applies to all property along a waterway within the City of Aspen. The City amended the 130 Sounr GALENA STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 81611-1975.• PNONE 970.920.5x90 FAX 970.920.5439 Printed m Recycled Paper. Stream Margin regulations, via Ordinance 22, Series of 1995, to require development be set back from the top-of-slope, a term defined in the City's Land Use Code. The period of statutory vested rights has expired and the Oden property is subject to this regulation. An amendment to the building envelope appears to be necessary to comply with the setback requirement, but further analysis should be accomplished to determine the necessary extent of changes, if any. Affordable Housing Requirement. The County's "density reduction lot split" provided both a subdivision approval, and a growth management approval. This differs from the City's process which only provides a subdivision approval, subject to compliance with growth management exemption criteria. City lot splits are typically required to provide an ADU or cash-in-lieu payment as a condition of the subdivision approval. Because the County's approval provided a growth management approval, no further growth management exemption is required for development of a residence on the vacant Lot#1. However, upon expiration of the period of statutory vested rights the subdivision is subject laws of general applicability enacted since the approval. Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1990, requires a growth management exemption be obtained for the replacement after demolition of single-family and duplex development. This Ordinance applies generally to all property within Aspen and would apply in the case of demolition of the existing Oden house. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Nothing in the 1988 subdivision approval or in documentation provided references an approved or specified floor area. It appears that the subdivision created lots subject to compliance with the applicable zoning regulations, as may be amended from time to time,but did not assure any specific zoning dimension. When the property was annexed, it was assigned to the City's Low-Density Residential (R-30) Zone District. Incidentally, the property enjoyed a significant increase in allowable floor area by virtue of the City's zoning. Amendments have occurred to the allowable floor area, and the method of calculating allowable floor area, for this zone district since the 1989 annexation. Floor area regulations, and amendments thereof, apply generally to all property in the City of Aspen according to the assigned zone district. Your letter references certain provision of the County Land Use Code that were not in effect at the time of your subdivision or at the time of annexation. The City does not apply the County's Land Use Code in the City and does not recognize County regulations as applicable to your clients property. 2 This property is like-any other property in th/*- Zone District affected by changes to the City's zoning regulations. This property enjoys no special, protected rights and is subject to the applicable City zoning dimensions, including the methods in which those dimensions are measured. Sincerely, Chris Bendon, AICP Long Range Planner City of Aspen Att: Krizmanich Letter Copy: John Worcester,City Attorney Aspen City Council 3 Nov 12 02 01 : 17p p1 I b Nov 12 02 01 : 17p FROM - aLP1NE SURVEYS ii PML7NE No. 9709252686 ' 9 NOU. 11 2092 09:05AM PL ..rr! Alpine Summ lnc. Post Office Box 1730 Aspen,Colorado 81612 970 925 2688 86-160 11.11.02 Bob Staradoj C/o Mason&Morse Hand delivered Re:Adjusted lot I Oden lot split Dear Bob: I have calculated the area of the captioned lot which Iies below the mean high water line of Hunter Creek and find it to be 1403 square feet. Sincerely yours, James F.'Reser L.S.9194 -- -cam:•,. - J Hoag 571J RCFW EXHIBIT "A" (Pagel) REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY t O0ZH LOT LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA NO.1: NEW RIGHT-OF-NAY Beginning at the SW corner of the Oden parcel as described in Book 194 Pages 180 and 181 from Which the West 1/4 corner of Section 7, T 10 S, 'A 84 W, 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, ; State of Colorado bears N 90° 00' 00" W 857.60 feet; thence along the arc o! a curve to the right whose radius is 287.113 and central angle is 450 52' 28" and whose long chord beard N I4' 25' 36" E 224,04 feet; thence H 73*' 071 W 12.60 feat; thence S 28° 8' 514 W 102.04 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the . .left whose radius is 149.83 feet and central angle is 52 00' 44" f and whose long chord bears S 02° 48' 29" W 131.39 feeC to a point i Which is an the south lot line of said parcel, thence along said ` fat line H 000 " .12.26 feet to the point of beginning. Containin 0.039 acre" are or less. AREA-HO.2: PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY Beginning at the SW corner of the Oden parcel as described in i Book 194 Pages 180 and 181 from which the West 1/4 corner of Section 7, T 10 S, R 84 W, 6th Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, i State of Colorado beard N 90 00' 00" W 857.60 feet; thence along ? f the arc of a curve to the right Whose radius is 287.43 and central angle'is 450 52' 28" and Whose long chord bears H a4° 25' 36" E 224.04 feet; thence S 730 07' W 35 feet; thence,S. 28 48 ; 51" W 68 feet; thence along the arc or a curve to the .4eft whose - radius is) 184-83 feet and central angle is 520 00' 44" and whose long chord bears S 040 40' 00" W 149 feet; thence E 20 feet to the point of beginning. Cantalning 0. 145 acres more or less, pp i i ti „r k� �� f :.W Md we�-a�'?h'•' 4ia:�V '� i'7'r t.Q � r, �J. �N ,u'�i ~,• ,yr� �yM19�Y�i ,.`►f�C7`rEAi2 F'LC�t� PLAIN LINT �w GDEN a LCD S IT W 1 TN E5t) CORMM r Ebb CAP �ru Lb 9181.4 � K- `�IN�� t • ` //•. ,:rte /- . �.- t1�,�5 P \4- LOT 2 ME • 'EN M ST a NCB BOUNDARY PROPOSED BOUNDQP • PROPOSED oUOLMNG - - -- -- • �_=-___--12' DRNEWAY EASEM�lT _. • . • �- �o'9-Cc . C1:, 315, P•PE.422) • =C3i°SSfS OF l3EAIZ.ING----- :. . . .3 : • •. . - �-` g I CITY ENGINI or -WE5T P.O.- JTf .t 74' <Dy t lo`I..79 gv DEPAKTMF—t-JT C ADJUSTED , . .I "SA Q ��I � Dt<.�/E.LOPM�tJT ►°nL�oN� i. ,:::;fit. �y `m LE r - cOLv -rN wAll i PARCEL I f I -------------------- 21,4167 SQ. ffT I � � ► t I a •�ocI Ln Qw -- z ' 7S I r cv Z Q. I COMMUNITY FROM ALPINE SURVEYS INC PHONE NO. 9709252688 OCT. 24 2002 02:28PM P1 Alpine Survey$, Inc. Post Office Box 1730 Aspen,Colorado 81812 970 925 2688 Eax ngM%Mk&11 CoverSheel i Date: 10.24.oZ To: W5 STAR= q*25' 7027 Atbr: bF=M M1 MeOt4 q2.5 ,ICAO Fax Number: QAMeLb L I NOT 99-0"54M Phone Number SLY gl� -: ALLY N 44 .022 Regarding: °�.3 -+CIJNt� AMENDMeNTTO C OE N f L A"r Sender: Jim e Number ofpages,including cover sheet: 2 *Nt¢' tf you do nor receive all of rite pages as indicated ahmv,please call 923-26813. Message: '"115th TO"r '�wbmrr A14 '©C LANAOTOW t�K=H 6EMWo FCI ZH MOC�T of TWE 15nFULAT10K!5 C0NTi4lN0V 'TV4L MMM0iC,Al1 DUM FROM JAMEt> W NO" PAT7-0 C CMEC- 21,2=2: YOUR CC7MMENTt J4C- K=MMN T, Qt?EM" ,Arica 5L*6 OhIb OL.ICr=. IT WOULD 5E MY bU °`now HoT-ro OW MOTH OL.O AND NEW CONI"WWMTldNAt� ON "'(H E FINAL. K AT bOr KAI" 4 MK J UbT* THE MEW. Acut5TMEt--rr PLAT 11� A RE40fWM0 T ON "tC44 -me New FIAT 4AcN er SvrmtMpotEO bwvLro I �t4Y0NE W t'aH TO COMPAfM 'rr4F- 'TWO. This mesmot u lmeteded onfyfor MAC ust Of the ix Mdual or entIV to 10011 t1 1s addressed,and way cowah? ? 0,16mtatton that It Plif PUSCIeO,C0NF10EN974&and exempt from disclower ender applicable law. if the reader e Of this message is not the intended 4apiom.<rr ihr cmt4oyce or agent responsible far drliverinr the itusssan to the intended reeOisnf,you am hereby no(Oad that any dissemination,dislribt(don or copying ajthis communication is strictlyprahibitad. lfyou have reaehwd this compiunlcotion tri error,please n&jfy us immedlarafy by telephone,and return the ZIAM&f to us by mail wilhatd nwking a copy. Think you FROM ALPINE SURVEYS INC PHONE NO. 970925268B OCT. 24 2002 02:29PM P2 `tXPLANATOR KETCH r FT LES5R TIONS NOCATEt E PF1..5 C7F 216o,2Z Oq I=T . . !,F7 ) AKEA of { O�P i .01do 7.2 4 1 F.- a -; R> A FAI CEL EXCW — ( { dD 2-14 ..AMtN.om p r AWN t; To: Sallie Golden From: John Niewoehner ` City of Aspen Co ity Development Engineer THE Crrr of ASPEN Date: October 21, 2002 RE: Oden Lot Line Adjustment—Second Amendment The following are the engineering comments on the Oden Lot Line Adjustment Plat: 1. Provide all bearings and distances for Lot#1, Lot#2 and Adjusted Sale Parcel 2. All corners of Lot#1, Lot#2 and the Adjusted Sale Parcel must be monumented. Install survey monuments as required and show these monuments on the plat. 3. Give new lots areas for Lot#1, Lot#2 and Adjusted Sale Parcel. 4. Give new descriptions for Lot#1, Lot#2 and Adjusted Sale Parcel 5. In engineer's signature block, change the wording 'City Engineer' to 'Community Development Engineer'. /plat-review/oden-amend2 MEMORANDUM To: Bob Stardoj c/o Sallie Golden From: James Lindt, Planner Date: October 21, 2002 Re: Oden Lot Line Adjustment and Stream Margin Amendment Plat #2- Community Development Department's Comments Please make the following changes to the Oden Lot Line Adjustment Plat: I. Amend Plat Title to say, "Second Amendment to Oden Stream Margin Review and Lot Line Adjustment". 2. Amend purpose statement to read as follows: "The purpose of this plat is to amend the property lines of Lots I and 2,of the Oden lot Split and the Sale Parcel, of the Oden Lot Split. In addition, this plat also amends the building envelope on Lot 1, Oden Lot Split. 3. Remove the cross-hatching, delineation, and label for slopes under 20%. 4. Indicate the lot area that is being removed and added to each lot. 5. Indicate the building envelope area being added and removed on Lot I. 6. Grant an additional access easement for the benefit of Lot 2 across amended Lot 1 where the driveway crosses Lot 1. 7. Amend lots sizes on adjusted "sale parcel" and on Lot I to make them represent the lot size of the adjusted parcels. 8. Amend the City Engineer's signature block to say, "This Oden Lot Line Adjustment and Stream Margin Amendment Plat was approved by the Community Development Engineer of the City of Aspen, Colorado this day of , 2002." 1 9. Add the following language to the existing plat note: "The allowable FAR for Lot One shall be based on the gross (does not include i b applicable lot area reductions for slope reduction or area under mean high water line that is deducted at time of development) lot size of ; 26,267 SF, which represents the lot area of Lot 1 prior to any Lot Line ' b Adjustment being permitted on the site. The allowable FAR for Lot 2 shall be based on the gross (does not include applicable lot area r reductions for slope reduction or area under mean high water line that is deducted at time of redevelopment) lot size of(fill in Lot Area of Lot 2 prior to either Lot Line Adjustment), which represents the lot Ask area of Lot 2 prior to any Lot Line Adjustment being permitted on the site. 10. More clearly label the existing and proposed building envelope (please see attachment for example of label location). 11. Remove the original building envelope, and remove label stating "original building envelope" (please see attachment for example of line and label to be removed). 12. All of the Community Development Engineer's Comments must be reflected on the final set of two mylar plats in addition to the Community Development Department's comments. 13. Obtain all signatures with the exception of the City Community Development Director, City Engineer, and Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder prior to submitting two mylar copies to the Community Development Department. F F E MEMORANDUM TO: Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below: 0 ........... City Engineer X ......... Community Development Engineer 0......... Police Department 0 ........... Zoning Officer 0 ........... Housing Director 0 ........... Parks Department 0 ........... Aspen Fire Marshal 0 ........... City Water 0 ........... Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District 0 ........... Building Department 0 ........... Environmental Health 0 ........... Electric Department 0 ........... Holy Cross Electric 0 ........... City Attorney 0 ........... Streets Department 0 ........... Historic Preservation Officer 0 ........... Pitkin County Planning 0......... DRC FROM: James Lindt, Planner Community Development Department 130 So. Galena St.;Aspen, CO 81611 Phone-920.5095 Fax-920.5439 RE: Oden Lot Line Adjustment#2 Parcel TD#2737-2737-072-13-001 DATE: October 18, 2002 COMMENTS: Please review and return comments by October Thanks, James � '� 1 � Ltt K t'f�rn i @.f:1�ftl II 1 ... p1 A$•ti"'M+€`�+'�fi�S �T i9+H?y�8+! 4,+^`' 5 r`F-u �3t'@F'Y 5 ""x.:8 i"�+i mow. J' •1: C 4 P 1 N f +4 Per ry: LOT SPLIT � ��` � Pr j�• t F 'fie � 9�r e�dans ��t � gg _t9:'4'�; 1~, L A� b SCkjPTION s *3 t# + r ) ' /.• �, .-r l.. +( A 11)1 J 1vhJl .A 41 �} S�APPRO/ll'� ID �'t,�` , j �' � thl St t I AI 'kFln( I µ9R .;✓tT �Jiri'TIP dFIiT ' C � q I A!r ,I'!. rlt r.P r'rV,t/ Y Lrf T�'rGl• r l 'Lx CA w Jn_i3; L m� �, Y�v�-•$ � t"`,�s � ` •� �%� �„•� \ A it R i>w 1 fl+RLRY 14 II T,t y lrf F.,A� �' f Y iE Y111i+ ��..•. r "+f' ?' ruil Y.errvt>WE T,«y ru r +�F �1- "�+"tlp"s rGlswn"4i,'e / /- -.•- '_t L x+a t- rr rr c n Nt hL r.T w;yc ' uu.k r«Ylaly rc!9"cz�'�ir iwt.l'"til3T'�"' L t n i fA '.r '�PK rEt•rf T4s mt UrlLrn S+E,t -.•' <Y �,:-• p p 00000 p 1 d PW li+s r at b'.Yt <rue �15t' eie '? E po o \ r: r rntiel',G�v,-, tle�9,wt td� r It a � �� '•�OpaO op cJ;uh cr TRtk�4 l fYC A b KJ N[ S ! iv' 319C3,EIC J y t O 1.1 E4 MC9 Z LL „TN2 fL�.l ln41E.rdJK L� - f{ t) ffy r'"KI�N ^ T 'tl lr uTe �a rl iu re'5GLyr tl1 $S,Af i q,F - r;E E /. —.�`\ o rr nt•I Ds� z tr'r tl'fCw[osnri 4u eG t �y �'i4 1 $' ! IA/ o , tYr 1Jr c J '. lEty-1 i•'�cr.`✓,<t F• '. 111E tEM EI"�' JI-IT rsC tKEGK 91 [SI L�E AL't ryrrl �� l 4 ' \ 1` E!-c Si OS Y•F C2S Y i4ElYL ! ) !YrRF..n Yl<lJN+LlF RNV�j.. 'IP., \ m11L ea s 1 se m N INE/J�'C tJ M C1Ji y5 W +3v Yr f I i n.$1, 4 u•6Kgr d ON K-CE E tR4 1017 Y !Ith.E Ncst}w h^tr A Fi r S ��p' A ��T'6 111[}eE xvtH•wm rt "J t y�'',,)) h t��'� ,g�`'�" LIGI,iYK WEST RI'b rf Tp t pD M 1tTL1('R per, 1S tCN,1 uc�14 QRrS 7 4 �e�M �Si�i�� jk � 7 r X� U.;�kvt�YRS C MAR.}1��1 f7 ( a a P lECD.T CERTrFIdAFi N �F' EDIC471�1N & r1af�t� ry w TP n r eg OWNUSHIf' ' r Iu t oK ii K4Y7N•MLL�MEN'�N{FTyC9E dlt�KG1t TI}T'a MNnvrx+<I y k irl'�C FD'y3 L j ' R'00E1.1 b G tOhEJS M u �'. CrX.YPA1u4 n PAFCTN♦JJKP 9LIIJS`r'jL�?R+731'! ? �1d1] Y11 1 dr'cr?RrNu L.VJtss 15',i rlrwN r�LJr.rry s�a.b�'Arbtl j ttdn f�n�v'pY=aa ?� rr` ° vP-FirClryEl7 nAti�J-1CW}u u�li;��1.1 �1)vsi�lsY y o tldJ tue�E PRCSEJJTn VHEr!Gt7r fT-.1`F`�TE73 tArvC b 27 �'�`'1'^ e . ar'`�`� 5UOt5ry hen Tue>AF,t rriTi3.Ttvn:l.t5'r5 Ns.yG :Fu r yIA �7'��. •�t : '. .II x'.11 � ObELi LdT,rt.ljrk N•10 erlLc .nr 'aiL AI�'7IAt•yL 1�.ne.0 eSRr _ ;xk�, y DeP a A}ro nactEb U r RE�i rswt W 9 M i t l L IG � y u� tl n �' - � :'owiJrx�irs•i GKANf7 1 F • .` / r ItEP'SEi�le.A1r rd1'a L�bN n�luEn MA rEN-wCE < 1 '�� 1 5�' 1 �'da.: nrJr�ijCR Rf PL.ICE{aFEIJr C r"LKI Yrll-I(s ,�� f r t ��,� I+L`'�r I � t�"j. ( r,�� vnLrr Lif-rf' (3.�,M M,M1•.j rL �"�� EE rrax.JJ r ns2.rn r o i-.r --1 f Ukm, 41 c t�t t by N9,110 zk` �t- L-e :W PKOVroL b, Zrn eeR✓cL m tuc ACCEb A NCLL rhM Rtsoc FORREC RD1NG A+cc Ib-s'tali a+'D•4n '1L�n�c,'St:�llE rcYa 'S h 'I LOf 2 exPKLisLy RL9LJEV1i�k LfrFp TuE rswtu_Ft � „{�'L�*�>,doY4TS c a I ,�, .. :ef'ivr Lor THY,Rloa{r TD'KG t+ 4icn ek"ilcr}YL 1� �q I Id LC1[xrt'1'RG croe �1u t t 'iiG'V'vY C`- t y c EK"' 6 rm.Nr fKEr-Y15ES:;VRwlt�i irAf1 ReLOCn7fa- Pf .lCu9 x ari x`ck9"IFy CzacR4 � ary y+R I' nGEOMPLI4WR 6*T �N'IJEJI nr M1D L8T'L l n{'RLI MINIMAL t4 TGE -1N MIAT dk Z�i fit. III ) PEKE!-CL Tp-M1�L LONYI UCII"PNJWNt'1-tr C£ t `7011 J i4:iz'IL YI�' �'S�SYIk <I °C" ��.AL i rlLiTr SER fICL' /N xG �_ vlo r+E E G JCGp:.r A LN t>.>E,tu.rrFluw.IT LL rx.,,1 E 1S n} %J`� y� V9LE rOKM iWWn•Y. T4iE AIGWI-EtAYrG�1 r ) $ 7� L°iLLLt1x„1; mi1�s, �, -U7'En:/i4 ISIL pµ'?'AEJC Uf LOr 1?.Nn/W1 •re ` h h1J fiGCl}R."Cll e �/, ', uEn ryoLOt:ns'e»REttlan`ruEaelN IQJr,�DD 6 96ta's � �� i� ' rt oT I+.n br z alowu�rJPxG'bN.air: i 'S• s �`'" c*YwcTFn ro r E'GIA ` t F t F N EL 1�1 � S }s ; � MORE TH,N .HE Cn.F�!lN LOT. 'n7PnLON}'GT'Nq QJK:PR K Ply Owke WELLIIC• F Y�5l EA•f.1-nG uPJFCfY1 G.IL'/J1'f'.W Y<•1'E PC$g4lG 'Fl1e -'t J fi T �'dh SSJx+ i j F -'{tS ' . _ rl�iNr-R/�MVS . RWNINb Iyprfl(y YIJE-F'LTtTilEF L4 nIXJrJWfty S I S s�J g }JI J1 w aArn PKCPEJrry P,rIN:.'TtiE eEJ-rr wmE y iNOTE' = '`.,_ f t!�IJaiq�, 't�w� ,i�, a 11Lt.TrEn c�PrAC;I.,p r+re�recr �I;p1IL ;�?�' Kkw rnwr,n'N?cTUEk�3�^�m'Ll�tklt`��`��"x� ��a�� '. .. 9CUTTJPRLy s?nt'or.>NrJ FJLrtTUEltL4 P�:i}.rp..,k 'Se1G5NFJ LIEKEEl1 t4 9FO.W'4.1Y +�h.t sot.EL•1 cwt roe'u9t i-Nn'dn JO MWr,:Cr P•%1 �-L Er !>t+.nvcC Tb KU'7 WfYLJ TNEf•lKF7Yl4.1'� 4��Sy'�,Ri' EKMf}I WnfJIAK':4UNTP-1C Ul'EF�C:+1W T�l'IMMEr IUT t tr q y�' }Y pT" •�° ,R}f:lr' rLE1Jl- LFIN 'f�7E-VIE Y�vl O lvt EM4Yr 1•f L y� � rtarat zk0 vea+ICLE> x ANT r•r E � expv .I A PRIC/aVAL°RESbL,lgll�lO��'y+"3s�"r�r�c;p�`'� .;K-NEKrJYf.(dtnlYP9, AD AN KA-,Em LJr I>HEKf". LKfFL:S 4 Pno«ilp l- 'APPRCNF..d TI'74.er.PL1Y nt'l r'TOlri�t. AvrucrEN,v,rr m Lon 14 L, TL!AccnDS ` nhrl ccT i'rRic.Eav drl,l:ar od 't eK N,Vr+:ZO'arNTlEn.xfllorr Y11d . M sHOm Hr f. i:.or sPL '.CDa.iM145}1'rut"jey eE>7i 17Vnri.l Au In Re.Cdeprn e slln.l.cbmn.r Wrt 1 t«z KEto. :IN ru�;lc.44.�.1r f'VC % r' r�'KrElq��fta ,x T r-a � FFLKA T4�RRCPgE, MEJJDAT OFrf Gl'.T{Ik E.pplp�Ic R[!'ORT/10E�IEFP C1.�KK nl.ni xcEC �x ' ttK.ir or Tis� �s.�,t },in 4n17. Nv Nv lan>SAM KID ANr�rJ1 rn I'W<w11 I e1 c OLCK fY;-.` Rl)rJ�rCW Plk,if YG�J1+14a `ty5 ts�.yvl EXFLVr O TMD�. nAy'OP b`iCAIiEOMPnN—"�,7__` MDD i ! �F t+y'F�1� ?l��df 1S1§�Sls R+AEfTR d'IEEfA t i .,uFWrA Yet' 1'T: Gi'FJEn;/,I.VnRT1-[I 1x 't1 THE FT.Rr[dH+-G P�Er},T.r ML ILrl:r&I'�fnl<F'T 111J..r •. r Y ^:. 31 IY+CY.i:t R(:lkJ:'Mi rEl.IfxoL PAI(TNCK tv- n•1t V.rrrJP_»M 1 Oul.In cTY L I V..5#s t .ice 6 rrd .li/I nc �1{A�t{� I / 14). Swreisd -- DrNled 'IeWlnns y 3�17 - /r� ODEN LOT SPI I ry r' n �.. ,..,, ,.<,-•..,-.. 0 ter. N pc h. .S Ooo ¢0.a LOT I a, o LOT 2 n o M' 24G 'I �' i i ,cam" �°";•� ' 1 ��GMFJY]'A4 t417yA Y 1I ,41 IN KOC I94 AT ft," 1t � 1 I Alpine Surveys,Inc. �. non au..I..11w a Wrap ' 303 935 1Ctl6 tl1O1i } HAAS LAND PLANNING , LLC March 19, 2014 4 71 Mr. Chris Bendon, Director MAR 2 0 2014 Aspen Community Development Department (;p1'y oi__ A 610EN 130 South Galena Street -y tt WTY DEVELLAMENT Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Stream Margin Review Exemption Request for 110 Red Mountain Road Dear Chris: Please consider this letter and the attached drawings to represent a formal request for a Stream Margin Review Exemption to accommodate a modest remodel of the existing home at 110 Red Mountain Road. The subject property borders Hunter Creek and has an area of approximately 40,511 square feet (0.93- acre). It is zoned R-15-A/PD, Moderate-Density Residential with a Planned Development Overlay, its Parcel Identification Number is 2737-072-13-002, and it is legally described as Lot 2, Oden Split Subdivision. A single-family home with two attached garages and an outdoor, in-ground pool currently occupies the site. The owner is completing a modest renovation of the existing home, including re lacement of the leaky, inefficient roof and_ redevelopment of the two garages (see Exhibit 6). The driveway serving the residence will also be modified pursuant to an already issued (February 14, 2014, recorded at Reception Number 608135) Stream Margin Exemption. As nothing more than a remodel of an existing single-family development, the Planned Development overlay is not applicable and of no effect. In late summer of 2013, Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP) and the High Country Engineering (HCE) surveyors set nails with blue grading feathers in the ground along the apparent top of slope for Hunter Creek. HLP then met on-site with Josh Rice of the Aspen Engineering Department to review the marked top of slope. Mr. Rice relocated one or two of the markers in the area behind the existing. garages. HCE then went back`out to the site and resurveyed the final top of slope line per Mr. Rice's review and acceptance, includi ca survey provided with Exhibit 6 h efo showstht had made. The accompanying y P final top of slope line as reviewed and approved in the field by J9�4�. c lso shows a line that is fifteen (15) feet offset/setback from the top f GA I loYpe lin�e. COMMUNITY OMLMENT • 420 E. MAIN STREET SUITE 10-B • ASPEN, COLORADO • 8161 1 • PHONE: (970) 925-781 9 • MITCH@HI_PASPEN.COM As it currently stands and as shown on the accompanying survey, there are several parts of the home that reside within the 15-foot setback from the Hunter Creek top of slope line, including: a portion of the southerly two-car garage (there are two two-car garages); the concrete retaining wall, 2nd floor deck and lower concrete patio areas at the rear of the house; the back portion of the home's northerly wing; and part of the pool/pool deck. All of these improvements were legally built in Pitkin County prior to the property's 1989 annexation into the City of Aspen. No substantial work has been done on the residence since the mid-1980s. The renovation/remodel will maintain most of the existing footprint, but the southerly two-car garage will become a one-car garage. As part of the change from a two-car garage to a one-car garage, this portion of the structure will be made to comply with not only the ten (10) foot side yard setback requirement of the R-15A/PD zoning designation, but also with the 15-foot top of slope setback and the associated progressive height limit. Again, the existing two-car garage in this location encroaches into the side yard setback, the top of slope setback and the associated progressive height limit. The other improvements encroaching into the 15-foot top of slope setback will remain in their current locations without being expanded. The only other part of the renovation requiring an exemption from the Stream Margin Review is the proposed replacement of the old tar and gravel roof. This y. roof leaks, does not meet today's building/energy codes and is very inefficient. As a result of the renovation, the roof will be 6-7 inches taller in an area where it s already encroaches into the 15-foot setback and its associated progressive height limit (see Exhibit 6). This additional height is needed to add insulation and snow weight bearing ability, and it represents the minimum improvement necessary to achieve the energy performance required by the City. That said, the roof will not move any closer to the top of slope and it will maintain the same roof form as currently exists on the side visible (through a dense stand of existing trees) from the Creek. "Development" is defined in the Definitions Section (26.104.100) of the Land Use Code as follows: The use or alteration of land or land uses and improvements inclusive of, but not limited to: 1) the creation, division, alteration or elimination of lots; or 2) mining, drilling (excepting to obtain soil samples or to conduct tests) or the construction, erection, alteration, or demolition of buildings or structures; or 3) the grading, excavation, clearing of land, or the deposit or fill in preparation or anticipation of future development, but excluding landscaping. 110 RMR SMR Exemption Request Page 2 Section 26.435.040(A) of the Code provides that all "development" within one hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams (including Hunter Creek), and within the Flood Hazard Area (100 year flood plain) is subject to Stream Margin Review. This heightened review is needed to reduce and prevent property loss by flood while ensuring the natural and unimpeded flow of watercourses. The subject property and its existing residence are located within 100 feet of Hunter Creek, a tributary of the Roaring Fork River. The proposed remodel and renovation falls within the parameters of "development," and would appear to subject this property to Stream Margin Review. However, the Community Development Director is authorized to exempt certain types of development from Stream Margin Review (see Code Section 26.435.040(B)), including the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development, provided that certain standards are met. Such remodels are allowed an exemption as the drafters of the applicable Code language realized that maintenance, upkeep and certain types of expansions, remodels and reconstructions would not increase the potential for property loss by flood and would have no real affect on the natural and unimpeded flow of watercourses. This is exactly the case with the proposed remodel/renovation. The existing home has been more or less continuously occupied since 1961. Over the course of these last 53-plus years, very little has been done in the way of maintenance or upkeep on the home. Further, much of the home and its systems have become antiquated and in need of replacement. While the structural components of the home remain in good condition, everything else is in true need of love, care, attention and upgrading. Owing in large part to the regulatory penalties, exactions and other requirements that would come with demolishing 40% or more of the existing structure, the applicant must maintain at least 60% of the existing structure through the remodeling/renovation efforts. As such, the existing roofing cannot be simply torn off the building and replaced. Instead, the roofing structure must be maintained and built onto so as to achieve compliance with the City's energy performance and snow loading requirements. The exemption standards of Section 26.435.040(B)(3) are presented below in italicized print and each is followed by a response demonstrating compliance and/or consistency therewith, as applicable. a) The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty five (25) percent. All stream margin exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, Pale 3 110 RMR SMR Exemption Request a stream margin reviezu by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and The proposed development is maintaining primarily the same footprint as the existing home and replacing the roof. Where the footprint is changing, it is improving compliance with setback and stream margin requirements. The increased height of the roof is required for compliance with currently applicable energy codes, and it will not add any floor area to the existing structure. There will likewise be no change in exempt areas. Prior exemptions from Stream Margin Review do not affect compliance/consistency with this review criterion. b) The development does not require the removal of and tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code. No trees are being removed that would require a permit. c) The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development; No portion of the remodel will become any closer to the high water line than it currently is. The proposed renovation maintains the same footprint as the existing residence. Where the footprint of the structure is changing, it is moving further from the high water line of Hunter Creek and further from the top of slope line. d) The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been designated through a prior reviezu; and The proposed development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope. There is no building envelope designated on or for the subject property. e) The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the 100-pear flood plan [sic]. The existing home and the proposed remodel remain wholly outside of the 100- year flood plain. The proposed remodel and renovation is necessary maintenance and upkeep of the existing residence. It will not increase the potential for property loss by flood, and it will have no affect on the natural and unimpeded flow of Hunter Creek. Since the proposed development, as described herein and as shown on 110 RMR SMR Exemption Request Page 4 the accompanying plans set, meets all of the standards for an exemption from Stream Margin Review, the owner respectfully requests that the exemption be granted. It is hoped that the provided information and responses prove helpful in the review of this application. If you should have any questions or desire any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Truly yours, Haas Land Planning, LLC Mitch Haas Owner/Manager Attachments: Exhibit 1: Pre-Application Conference Summary Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map Exhibit 3: Proof of Ownership Exhibit 4: Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC and Rowland & Broughton Architecture and Urban Design (R&B) to Represent the Applicant Exhibit 5: Executed Fee Agreement Exhibit 6: Survey from High Country Engineering, and Architectural Drawings and Narrative from R&B Mi R' 202014 CITY OF ASPEN '0MAUNITY DMLOPMENT 110 RMR SMR Exemption Request Page 5 EXHIBIT a a CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Hillary Seminick 970-429-2741 DATE: 3/17/14 PROJECT: 110 Red Mtn. Rd REPRESENTATIVE: Mitch Haas, 970-925-7819 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Stream Margin Exemption DESCRIPTION: The owner is remodeling an existing single family house at 110 Red Mountain Road. The property (Parcel ID# 273707213002) is located adjacent to the Hunter Creek, which is a tributary of the Roaring Fork River, and is therefore required to undergo a stream margin review. Any development within the stream margin area is subject to either a determination of exemption from stream margin review by the Community Development Director, or a review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Improvements to the subject property include in-kind replacement of an existing garage, replacement and relocation of a separate existing garage. The newly constructed garages will not encroach into the 15' setback from top of slope and will be under the 45 degree plan projected from top of slope. Additional activities at the property include insulation and repair of the existing roof, which will raise the existing roof height by approximately four (4) inches. The existing roof already encroaches into the 45 degree angle from top of slope. No tree removal is proposed within 100 feet of the high water line or the 100-year flood plain. The proposal does not add floor area to the existing structure or to the amount of the building area exempt from floor area calculations. In order to qualify for the exemption, the applicant must demonstrate compliance with section 26.435.040.13, Exemptions. In particular, an explanation of why there are no options to increasing the height of the primary roof is needed. A separate Stream Margin Review Exemption and Building Permit was issued for an interior remodel, landscaping, including a new driveway and retaining walls. Please note that any exterior work needs to comply with Residential Design Standards (RDS). Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience. http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%201and%20 use%20a pp%20form.pdf Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.040 Environmentally Sensitive Areas—Stream Margin Follow link below to view the City of Aspen Land Use Code http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Pla jr i g- nd- Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Y OF 'ASPEN Review by: Community Development Staff MENT Public Hearing: None Planning Fees: $1,300.00 Deposit for administrative review. Additional time over four (4) hours will be billed at $325 per hour. Referrals & Fees: $265/hour for Engineering Review (deposit is taken for 1 hour of work; all additional hours are billed at $265 per hour). Total Deposit: $1,565.00 Total Number of Application Copies: 2, 1 set of full size plans To apply, submit the following information: 0 Land Use application, signed fee agreement and deposit for review of application. Q Pre-application Conference Summary (This document). Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. D Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation, as well as the Stream Margin review lines, showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. = An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. = 3 copies of the complete application packet and maps. 0 A written and graphical description of the proposed development, and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application § 26.435.040.6.3, Stream Margin Review Exemption. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. - Vicinity Map EXHIBIT' 110 Red Mountain Road a Z - 110 Red Mountain Road r y willaWnoy Ponds Eatat ti tar Craer , r ` t y Lek _ y'� � ,}54+'4'1. I� � ;t•). :..�..,—•• l j Gl —27 y-27 37 T105 Raw 075. tr,•+�r � -�l • „� �';y�.eSS+ 8 / 9 m }• ` ik io, �1 v ~tip f'l 7ruemsn Ptelgh�xncM t:''o�nt++narrrsaal Prgaat �`• t _ ate • • /a�� 1 Maw M171116n $� Puppy. rrrf, aka _ ti 4� • `7 x+�•/ • mo 2737 T1 0s R84YY S A Rcm-ag fwk River o' 07" ( �, Ca Lux Ph ;7rvsman Neoghtwnaoa Commercial Prgxt Ria Grams lb IGer 1'118- k�fik�sr�,� t 1�_�1 �P,� � �• rte' 1181wIC 1�D1 Split 110, 07 2737 T10S R84 VI - • r x At Couaty�Camter BLf ,fin • +�• y � � ��'+�.5�- EXHIBIT { 3 III I IN I 11111111111111111 State Documentary F3 e Date:August 14, 1 Special Warranty Deed $340.00 (Pursuant to 38-30-115 C.R.S.) THIS DEED,made on.August 14,2013 by ROBERT ODEN FAMILY TRUST AND ROBERT ODEN MARITAL TRUST NUMBER ONE AND ROBERT ODEN MARITAL TRUST NUMBER TWO Grantor(s),of the County of 50�a-- and State of FLORIDA for the consideration of($3,400,000.00)***Three Million Four Hundred Thousand and 00/100***dollars in hand paid,hereby sells and conveys to 110 VALHALLA,LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Grantee(s), whose street address is 9201 Wilshire Blvd, #305, Beverly* ,County of Los Angeles and State of the following real property in the County of Piddn,and State of Colorado,to wit: SEE EXHIBIT"A,ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN *Hills, CA 90210 also known by street and number as:110 RED MOUNTAIN RD, ASPEN CO 81611 with all its appurtenances and warrants the title against all persons claiming under the Grantor(s)GENERAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2013 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS AND SUBJECT TO THOSE ITEMS AS SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT"B"ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN. ROBERT ODEN FAMILY TRUST RECEPTION#: 602513, 0811412013 at 03:28:07 PM, r 1 OF 5, R $31.00 DF $340.00 Doc Code SPEC WD NANCY C.O EN,TRUSTEE J Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ROBERT ODEN MARITAL TRUST NUMBER ONE 7k-� 04 i NANCY C.ODEN,TRUSTEE MAR 2 0 2014 CITY OF ASPEN _ ROBERT ODEN MARITAL TRUST NUMBER TWO NANCY C.ODEN,TRUSTEE Y - YRM�� PA-110 y�.�baoa- rra�yy RAO ' W sit FridTide Form 13773 10/2010 swd.open.rev.odt Special Warranty Deed Open(Photographic) Q62005381 {17315931} --COW-1 ��i1i11iN9Hl,__ PEEp to A 2 N�1c• ,� j MEE 846516 ,9•..jr�eondod4'� ••�� %�'•�Ad�iclhr nc'�� State of FLORIDA )ss. County of UQ ) ��NI1111111Ni�� The foregoing mstnment was aclmowledged before me on this day of August I a 2013 by NANCY C.ODEN AS TRUSTEE OF TBE ROBERT ODEN FAMILY TRUST AND NANCY C.ODEN AS TRUSTEE OF ROBERT ODEN MARITAL TRUST NUMBER ONE AND NANCY C.ODEN AS TRUSTEE OF TBE ROBERT ODEN MARITAL TRUST NUMBER TWO Witness my hand and official seaL My commission expires 101 a-4) D 1 Go Notary Public When Recorded Return to: 110 VALHALLA,TLC,A COLORADO LIl4 nED LIABILITY COMPANY i Form 13773 10/2010 swd.open rev.odt Special Warranty Deed Open(Photographic) Q62005381 1173159311 Exbibit A AMENDED LOT 2,ACCORDING TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO ODEN STREAM MARGIN REVIEW AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT RECORDED DECEMBER 10,2002 IN PLAT BOOK 63 AT PAGE 68. COUNTY OF PITKIN,STATE OF COLORADO. R E Dra'!, i'L MAR 2 0 2014 CITY OF ASPEN CC.",�,MUN11Y DEVE«t i,EN 1 Form 13426 07/2008 exhibimodt Q62005381 1171488921 EXHIBIT B Property Address: UO RED MOUNTAIN RD ASPEN CO 81611 RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE 'THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED December 24, 1902,IN BOOK 55 AT PAGE 116. TERMS,CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF UTILITY EASEMENTS RECORDED March 18,1885 IN BOOK 24 AT PAGE 59 AND RECORDED JANUARY 20,1887 IN BOOK 29 AT PAGE 582. EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH IN DEED RECORDED JULY 29,1976 IN.BOOK 314 AT PAGE 821. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE PROVISION RELATED TO THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED JANUARY 18,1963 IN BOOK 200 AT PAGE 576. TERMS,CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED August 16,1.976 IN BOOK 315 AT PAGE 422 AND AMENDMENT TO GRANT OF EASEMENT AND GRANT OF RECIPROCALACCESS EASEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 2,2013 UNDER RECEPTION NO.602204. TERMS,CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION RECORDED May 19,1988 IN BOOK 564 AT PAGE 410. EASEMENTS,CONDITIONS,COVENANTS,RESTRICTIONS,RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE ODEN LOT SPLIT PLAT RECORDED May 31,1988 IN PLAT BOOK 20 AT PAGE 90,STREAM MARGIN REVIEW AMENDMENT AND ODEN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT RECORDED JULY 23,2002 IN PLAT BOOK 61 AT PAGE 28 AND SECOND AMENDMENT TO ODEN STIIEAM MARGIN REVIEW AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT RECORDED DECEMBER 10,2002 IN PLAT BOOK 63 AT PAGE 68. ANY RIGHTS OR INTERESTS OFT EIRD PARTIES WHICH EXIST ORARE CLAIMED TO EXIST IN AND OVER THE PRESENT AND PAST BED,BANKS OR WATERS OF HUNTER CREEK. ANY QUESTION,DISPUTE OR ADVERSE CLAIMS AS TO ANY LOSS OR GAIN OF LAND AS A RESULT OF ANY CHANGE IN THE RIVERBED LOCATION BY NATURAL OR OTHER THAN NATURAL CAUSES,OR ALTERATION THROUGH ANY CAUSE, NATURAL OR UNNATURAL,OF THE CENTER THREAD,BANK,CHANNEL OR FLOW OF WATERS IN THE HUNTER CREEK RIVER LYING WITHIN SUBJECT LAND;AND ANY QUESTION AS TO THE LOCATION OF SUCH CENTER THREAD,BED,BANK OR CHANNEL AS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION MONUMENT OR MARKER FOR PURPOSES OF DESCRIBING OR LOCATING-SUBJECT LANDS. Form 13100 08/2008 b2exhibit.escrow odt Q62005381 1173159321 ANY FACTS,RIGHTS,INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY DATED March 01,2013 PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING,INC,JOB#2131618.00: OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE LOCATED IN SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY GRAVELACCESS DRIVEWAYALONG SOUTHERN BOUNDARY LOCATED OUTSIDE OF 12 FOOT EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 315 AT PAGE 422 AND ENCROACHES INTO SECOND AMENDED SALE PARCELAND COMMON GROUND HOUSING SUBDIVISION. Form 13100 08/2008 b2eghibit_escrowodt Q62005381 {173159321 EXHIBIT 8 City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 110 Red Mountain Road, Aspen (PID# 2737-072-13-002) Stream Margin Review Exemption To whom it may concern: As applicant for a Stream Margin Review Exemption on the above referenced property, I hereby authorize Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP) and Rowland & Broughton Architecture and Urban Design (R&B) to act as designated and authorized representatives for the preparation, submittal and processing of a letter requesting the approval listed above, as well as any subsequent or incidental applications that may be associated therewith. HLP and R&B are also authorized to represent 110 Valhalla, LLC in meetings with City staff, the Historic Preservation Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Aspen City Council. Should you have any need to contact me during the course of your review, please do so through Haas Land Planning, LLC. Yours truly, SFr. 110 lhalla, s By: David ora ?W 9201 Wils ire BlZ90210#305 �lAk Beverly ' s, C ® ��,� (310) 274-7832 G€T Y OF A (J N EXHIBIT 1 5 1 o ' Agreement to Pay Application Fees Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property 110 Valhalla, LLC Phone No.: (310) 274-7832 Owner("I"): Email: dmoray @aol.com Address of 110 Red Mountain Road, Aspen Billing 9201 Wilshire Blvd #305 Property: Address: Beverly Hills, CA 90210 (subject of (send bills here) application) understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ $650 flat fee for Parks $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 1.300 deposit for 4 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$325 per hour. $ 265 deposit for_1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Vor Chris Bendon Community Development Director City Use: Fees Due: $ Received: $ November, 2011 City of Aspen 1'10 S. Galena St. J970) 920-5090 D EXHIBIT a aspen 234 e hcpkins ave,aspen co 81611 + t 970 544 9006 denver 1830 blake st,ste 200,denver co 80202 + t 303 308 1 373 visit www.rcwl2ndbroughton.com rowland+broughton architecture/urban design/interior design MEMORANDUM Project: 21350— 110 Red Mountain Subject: Code Compliance for New Roof Date: 18 March 2014 To: City of Aspen From: Rowland Broughton Architecture Cc: 110 Red Mountain Road is a residence originally constructed in 1961 with an addition put on in 1975. The residence has not had any substantial work done on it since the mid-1980s. At that time the existing roof was added to with additional waterproofing and 2" of rigid insulation. The approximate R- value of this roof is R-15. The City of Aspen requires that remodeling and repair of existing structures maintain the buildings existing structure in order to not trigger"demolition". Below is the proposed roof assembly. This assembly increases the height above structure from approximately 6"with an R-15 insulation value to approximately 13 '/2"with an R-49 insulation value. METAL STANDING SEAM EXTERIOR ROOF HIGH-TEMP SELF-ADHESIVE SLOPE-RE: BITUMEN UNDERLAYMENT ROOF PLAN 3/4'PLYWOOD SHEATHING -""'�',<.^'✓ CLOSED-CELL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION(R51INCH MIN. sf - RAS MIN.) s?^ 2X12 PURLIN ANCHORED TO 2X4 CLEAT-RUN PERPENDICULAR TOAND _ �,- ANCHOR TO DUSTING _ DECKING m ` EXISTING STRUCTURAL T&G WOOD DECKING RUNNING ` PERPENDICULAR TO BEAMS MAP 1 f .m.. , EXISTING STRUCTURAL ' BEAMS CfTily OF -,.. INTERIOR ? lore ROOF ASSEMBLY R 1 MODIFIED EXISTING AND PROPOSED R-49 MIN. A7.2 SCALE 1ln'=r-a Page 1 of 2 rowland+broughton architecture/urban design/interior design The below table is from the 2009 IECC, which has been adopted by the City of Aspen for building performance requirements. The City of Aspen is in Zone 7, therefore the Ceiling R-value is required to be an R-49. TABLE 402.1.1 IN'UI.ATION AND FENESTRATION RFQUIRENIFN7S BY COMPONENT` CRAAA'l, GLAZED WOOD BASEMENT` SLAW SPACE` CLIMATE FFNFSTRATIgN SKYLIGHT' FENESTRATION MUNG FRAMEWALL t1A.S.S WALL FLOOR WALL R-VALVE WALL ZONF. V-FACTOR' MFACTOR 5tIC:C"•' R-V,ALUF R-VALUE R-VALUF' RNALUF R-VALUF &DEPTH R-VALUF 1 12 0.73 0.30 30 13 311 13 0 0 0 ? 0.65J 0.75 0.30 30 13 •L'6 13 0 0 0 3 0.50, 0.65 0.30 30 13 5t8 19 5113' 0 Si 13 4 except 035 0.60 NR 38 13 5110 19 10!13 10,2 Il 10, btazme 5 and 0-35 0.60 NR 3$ 20 ex 13+5" 13;17 e 10,211 1 3 Marine A 34 10'13 - 14 1 L 2 0.60 NR 49 30 ur 13+5" IV19 30C IN19 10,4B 10713 Td? dS 0.35 0.60 Nit 49 21 19,.21 38, 15!19 10,48 10!]3 This proposed assembly will require additional structure to be added to the residence to support and insulated roof with the added snow load. The existing structure will remain the primary structure of the residence. In conclusion, the proposed addition of approximately 6 '/2"to the existing residence's height is the minimum required to reach the energy performance required by the City of Aspen. If there are additional questions about the building performance requirements, please direct them to Rowland+Broughton. Page 2 of 2 v Imo, "g m 3 m o Z 2 nM °� I�`�.• � G z��rk 62 I - - - T -1 - - - - - - -/—'b- -u ( m �y o z �1 Iw I, fi A r€ n Is z amm U) °o n W m 0Z z LngA VPv, OA I co O A 'o O o R Y O � � -iO II I N p0) m 1 u 0 vvm 0ZO ?�f w ° Z 4 y rn 6) Z ;u 1j�0 RA n O m c As 3� 0 N 0 -ia A Os taut> � I pg x 4 $I: � u NN z LngA VPv, G1 I .. n Y 2 A TLi�r ;'• n ti,•k I N 2 8 r F _ I I ,! I � I I � rn e 10 �fP I I U Y:4NT8*919NI � Cr C 0 4 $I: C: NN z d VPv, d W T j y O o R Y W � v; Y W II I N p0) m 1 u p � Z T --O mw JwN44N. 1j�0 RA .. n Y 2 A TLi�r ;'• n ti,•k I N 2 8 r F _ I I ,! I � I I � rn e 10 �fP I I U Y:4NT8*919NI � �A ` w _i -' st p- Z Z x o g C: NN OWP OXO 9y VPv, r.1- T j _-s 1 I A d f3 O t, X. O IN 0 m �Il A Z 0T (n p0) m p � Z T --O mw JwN44N. 1j�0 RA �` mmom HIM ��mv eeooQQtz"' °°RF °° RN R 4 Fg R�W� 44g 44 4�RR° QQ44gQQ Re. �� 4444 °° °4Q i � E Rg �FR�gagB �g g�Re g g s E E EA m Pww qG'l w %4q i:a w:gl; N'; ry•iE5',�Rmu'{wwwq'$'N w,w RuWRN',R °. m 1 _ .al ...N�`��11^1"�a"l ry�i6i [q'Naq "ta�Ft�4^t�"�m �w Y>'•�we wgbsry clw y.il xlm Rmaywm9 O N R °9 mX °yZ O lmh m °�y s 0 y�•'�� a ga3� z ��y z� �� aowLt� Qi syl• �m�� $o�Aa��`p`p''� o $ bY° ~i $r^ •1 � y0'n z4 iii Y $�AD m�� a s 4y£ z n5 � 'cLi�I�' ®$� iF11W a £ gg .1 iNIVE 10pow g. Q-1 O°AZE f �2>F>� TYO ��c cmO.NN.Cw � y °ONACy�ye$Yp n 42 � �- �OZNO FyC yq 1 ATM iMti�i cmhT, as Am o5 Qa �iw°g N >01 n 8 ;a_INVOS, o_3.ark y! I:N Nv° orQN �y� g O� v�m < �fi� �yg$sy5m ° �pv61t~i N�h° zsac $cFiy� iPa z � , ,w �zr r a)o2-4 0U,0 ()3 C Ul co > Lo 0 6)CGLn rn 4 5 ;UU <UZ Nma z T �Z T r m N• m v m N >A m i 0 m� z o A. s _ r z >a 0M m z�y°r 0 m > 0 > s, m� z ^y $ Z = � m �� ' � �A ` w _i -' st p- Z Z x o g C: % 0 OXO 9y P I T j a 1 I A d f3 O t, X. O IN 0 m �Il A Z g O " 2 O m $$ mtm Tbm ;�mo pR po 9ts NRN (.,oY N gg}INA sW�u oO$ pOm NbF m p � U) rmr- < 4 x mmz � p � m ApAIH Opp 0T (n p0) m p � Z T A 0 �cs mm M. M. U) n z a� �J 04 St 4 O m m z 0 -o 0 z n c m -o �� 1�•%� r,�lxr a z � s i'' , -``O a p •r I I 0'i 1 a )', . N a J DAVID MORAY a..H�,.. (;1 0 CITY OF ASPEN HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING,INC. w RPI< NO. DATE REVISION_ BY CAC�MUTELI FNDp�&' N m 1517 BLAKE AVENUE,STE101, •`neoFVVM 1 12-2.13 XDDEDTREELOCAWNS._ RPK I-aCO.922-1987 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT GLENWOODSPRINGS,CO81601 nT& OR W4.Q5700IN METRO DENVER Z AMENDEDLOT2 PHONE(970)945-8676-FAX(970)945-2555 6.2p.13 CALL U6INE8S DAYy INAppvANCE D ORE 1'OU OIE ORADE,A CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO WWW.HCENG.COM 1698.DW6 U DER6ROUN R?MEM6A i1j,0 r rowland+broughton 234.ho01d.. 17130 rlW.{W�0 .P•4 m sm, a„w.m 110002 211 m. 30&30a,379. 070.5419R91 30330a7SFS, BACKYARDSETBMX P ..,._ .____............__— ......._ S HATER Cp ECK g b IW,e: 2013.12.16 TOP OF SLOPE DO-CONSTRUCTION DOOJA£NTS 2014.01.08 DD-CONSTRUCTION DOCIFASNTS 2014.01.20 TOP OF SLOPE DO-CONS7R/Ci,ON DOCUMENTS SETBACK-sTraAnt 2014.03.02 MAROIN BACK rAlO sETBAaK W-corsTRUCnoN DDKZAENTs SIDE YARD SETBACK INK80Cal POOL ® 1p POOL SFED LOWER CONCRETE PATIO VW L D DECK ! WATERVALVE ENTRY l o-p• �C O YARD sII7E rARD SETBACK atliyl/ TY/� 7 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD alSpFN RESIDENCE 110 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD °q ASPEN.COLORADO 81611 Of COLO FENCE iP X90 .Kr.Y G. TOP OF SLOPE SETBACK- qqc�'MN` O t may, STRFANWMIN 4U1269 ~ ELECTRIC -'R'Ty EAS9EM TOP OF SLOPE TRANS'. 1SFRro- 3}+, a AETrEr: O A GRAVEL SIDE YARD sErsaaK OfSVEYNY PROJECT W. 21950 OM FOE 21350 A114.dq FRONTYAROSETBACK SFEETTTLE _—_._...._.._..__ °y PROPOSED SITE PLAN scALE:v1s•=ro• 1� PROPOSED SITE PLAN __.._.._.....___ REFERENCE 0015.2 1FOR ADDITIONAL SITE E INFO OTON TEF@iQJ(E 0075.20,3.LAND FOR LANDSCAPE IKOfAMTION t0 : e e __ -. }_ _= O ea -10 17 rowland+broughton .hi d../urban d.W/kd—mspn 34'2• r.0 I L 8'217 L 27-817 230 a,=81 11 7830 Make tl,ste 200 aspen,,x 81811 denier,co 80202 9]0.%4.80080 303.308.13T3e 970.50d.3Q31` 303.308.13]8 f CHIMNEY (q Y1pODBEAK TYP. CHIMNEY BEYOND ' I - Conwltan6 T (E)RAIL a8v I TO.ROOF L.uz2 tT va- (E)WOOD SIDING 4 � (E)WOOD COLUMN AND I • • I (E)CONCRETE PATIO I \ \ ! I I I I I II I _ _— T.O.FlN.FI REF:OX.UN OFGRAOE, /slats: T.._....__.__...._.—_..__....._ 2013.12.16 4 • I DO-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ------ --- ------- — ---- --- — — /t • -------------------- ---------------------� 2014.01.08 APPROX.TOP OF SLOPE DD-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2014.01.20 I DO-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ---------- 201403.02 - - - — — CD-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS --––– APPROX.LINEOF -------— ------------------ -----L 7---- ------------------ FOUNDATION BEYOND, TYP. (E)STUCCO SIDING EXIST NG 1 WEST ELEVATION A4.1e arxe sf$=ra Mq �� E D C B A � 1 �Sp�• 88'-7017 A_ 2IT Z 8'217 T-017 L 3r-0• CHIMNEY RED MOUNTAIN ROAD RESIDENCE CHIMNEY BEYOND 110 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD — T ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 '� — — T-- a°f°aF� -(� TO.R EL 1t$-lt O 1l1'OF III t I III .\ • i/%j m -✓ - OF Coto 4 M WOOD BEAM, (E)WOOD SIDING 0 269 � �' �Q- yOO\ 1 V I i (E)WOOD COLUMN AND R DAR' (E)OECK BRACEBEYOND T T�O.FlN.1F Itl ITF I I PROJECT NO: ---------------------- ------------------ Ono / v 21350 APPROX LINE OF GRADE, � DWG FILE: RE:CIVIL - 21350_A4.7edwg � w SHEET TITLE EXISTING ii I I EXTERIOR --- ------------- — -------------- APPROX TOP ELEVATION --- ------------ --------------- OFSLOPE (E)STUCCO SIDING SCALE:3/16"=1'-0" ————— APPROX LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION BEYOND, A4. EST ELEVATION A4.1 e 3: to .......................... . ......................... .... ........... .. ....... ....... .......... ............. ......... ..... ........... ........... ........ ..... ...... ...... ............. ......................... ....... .......... ...... ................ ........... .............. 74-T rowland+broughton T•11' 72-07/2 z7'B erchlfectura/urban design d int®nur design 74'— 20'-712' 231 a IwPNns— 1830 Wake st,eta 200 asaon,co 81611 demur,co 80202 970544.90060 303,308.13730 970544.31731 303.308.1375 f CHIMNEY CHIMNEY BEYOND (E)GRAVEL ROOF Consultants .... .... _ I T.O ROOF EL.12S-01? W EL.11911 1N' (E)WOOD SIDING s, 2 T / \ APPROX.LINE OF GRADE, (E)DECK \ REF:CIVIL 1aC� Issue: I I 1 I 2013.12.16 APPROX.LINE OF DD-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ----------- --------i FOUNDATION BEYOND, 2014 TYR DD-CO.01.06 NSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS m 2014.01.20 DO-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS -- -� -�----------— i---- -t- -- 1--- DO-CO STIR ——— —_ T.O.FlN R A CO-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ---_— EL�1W 'Y EXISTING RECEIVED 1 SO H ELUTEVATION A4.2e scuE yis=in' T JF ASPEN V DEVELOPMENT 7f79-r 1D kk W-7 12' 14'-0' 21'-0' 12-011C RED MOUNTAIN ROAD RESIDENCE (E)GRAVEL ROOF CHIMNEY CHIMNEY I 110 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 T.O.ROOF 4 T.O.ROOF EL.n.n v4•0 SYS�OF CD(pA90 U SED ARCt\ (E)DECK I (E)DECK ly T— EL tp8'.Y �� PROJECT N0: 21350 APPROX.LINE OF GRADE, DN.G FILE: REF:CIVIL o 27350_A4.1e.dwg APPROX LINE OF FOUNDATION BEYOND, SHEET TITLE _ _ � EXISTING j I I I EL land r I' r EXTERIOR 1 --------- }� ELEVATION t ------------�--- ---------------- --------------- ----------- _ ———————' SCALE:3116"=1'-0" (E)WOOD COLUMN AND (E)STUCCO SIDING BRACE EXISTING ^ a 2 NORTH ELEVATION ,/•+�` A4.2e sV1E Y+c=1'd 4r) .00nov:w•m•wa 1 wourser.•nnrene .Sa< 2r� rowland+broughton aichifetiurp/urban eesiDn/mrenpraesyn 236 ehapBna ave 1839 bbk.4-200 aap."c'81811 E.m .89292 EXISTINGTWO 979.54 Mf 303.398135f BAY GARAGE ELEVATON )BB4'tl ConsuHanb E A ]BIO'd ELEVATQ! 6 ]Ba•1.4T W ELEVATION 7071+12'=ARCH 100'4- o EXISTING O LOPE r1 SITE SECTION DIAGRAM-DOUBLE GARAGE E�vAnw Ai.2e SCALE: 118•=1'{y )�•� 2013.12.16 DD-CONSTRUC71ONDOQA£NM 2014.01.06 DD-CONSTRUC71ON DOCLAVNB 2014.01.20 DO-CONSTRUCTION DOQ&£Nf8 2014.03.02 CD-CONSTRUCTION DOCUhENTS 21'-11 V2' EXI STING TWO BAY GARAGE 9 DVATW 4 4 b J,ELEVATON Q 4 ELEVATION 7871.12'=AR(]i 100.11' EXISTING C o r2 EDVATON SITE SECTION DIAGRAM-SINGLE GARAGE o 0 SLOPE A1.2e SCALE: Ire•=,'-0- RED MOUNTAIN ROAD RESIDENCE a1'e 12' 110 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 of Colo I - I Elcvanw EwsnNG LM I Jokry G < Ib i269 � G AR��`� E 74V TBT4' PROJECT NO 4 21350 DWG FLE 2135Dfd-UAnp raBa'o BFEETTflLE� 4 EXISTING SITE SECTION DIAGRAMS EuvAnw < SCALE:1/8'=1'-0' ELEVATION 7871.12'-ARCH 10' EXISTI NG q W - W o SLOPE SITE SECTION DIAGRAM-WNG AREA o 0 A1 .2e A1.2e SCALE: 1/8'=1'-0' ELEVATW O omom-.�.e.�m •••c...w.....o... 7840'-0' i ff - _ ....................... A B c o E =. — ..... W-10 117 as trr rowland+bo .gat.ton 34-4r 3e'a• r-o 112. 2(r-5 1rz afdwbcf"/ulbm & 234.IvpW.... 1830 eak.:1,�o zoo .w.R."81611 a.A1•.1,w wm 870.5..9006 0 303.308.1373 0 970.5..34731 303.308.1375 f (N)METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF,TYP. (E)WOOD BEAM, (E)CHIMNEY TYR BEYOND NEW WOOD SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING AS NEEDED WOOD BEAM .__...... WOOD LOUVERS Conwltants 12 I EL 1z3'a 14•lo GUARDRAIL NOT EL.1]Y6 t? SHOWN FOR CLARITY 12 _ _ m E WOOO SIDING — -- —!'-25 EL.118R-1 () T.O.NEW GARAGE OGF A IIIIIIII (E)WOOD COLUMN AND BRACE BEYOND i OO O »O OO -- — PATCH d REPAIR SIDING AS NEEDED (E)CONCRETE PATIO I I Fill f TO, ,N.� I MF.._.._.___._.._............................_. EXISTING WOOD ---------I --------- 2013 12.1e APPROX.LINE OF GRADE, / \ \ / COLUMN,TYP. ____ _————————— 204 01400,5 RUCTION DOCUMENTS REF:CIVIL / \ \ / ® ® DO-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS EXING I RETSTI AINING WALL I 2014.01.20 CONCRETE DO—— I —— _ G N 2014 W.02 DOCUMENTS I L taro 0 CD-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ---------------------------- -----L 7- --- ------------------ APPROX.LINE OF FOUNDATION BEYOND, TYP. PROPOSED RECEIVED 1 WEST E E VATION A4.1 6cr4e MAR 0 2014 MUM Y FASPEN E D C B A DEMONEW sB'-tD trr 2B'•5 ve 9-8 trr r-0 trr (N)METAL ROOF.TYP.SEAM RED MOUNTAIN ROAD (E)WOOD BEAM, BUILDING HEIGHT,PER RESIDENCE (E)CHIMNEY TVP. LUC 26.575.020.F(b) BEYOND WboO GU RA 110 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD GUARDIL (N)OA INTAKE VENT FIREPLACE WALL VENT _ — _ To RZ ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 IN)DRYER VENT-----------, I ?o. Roor EL 133'-01? E)WOOD SIDING 6 TRIM at — ,12 \\ T.O.NEW GARAGE ROOF m pF CQLO"' I �. — EL.116'a 3'4• A.P 9Q y o JOHN O. + D EPAIR SIDING WHERE qG NEEDED MIT U 'C�' )WOOO COLUMN AND ~SFO ARG`r\ oil m BRACE BEYOND + T.O.FIN.M_ I � EL 108'6• I PROJECT NO: (STING STUCCO 21350 APPROX-------- DWG FILE: O O ® O O OUNDAT10N BEYOND ,TYP.� 21350_."1.ftq APPROX LINE OF GRADE, SHEET TITLE REF:CIVIL — TELiW-0'Y PROPOSED r u I EXTERIOR ----vAr4IiaREaae--- — -- — — ----- ----------------------------- � ELEVATION SIDINGASNEEDED SCALE:3/16"=1'-0" (E)CONCRETE PATIO dl PROPOSED A4.1 2 EAST ELEVATION �a A4.1 9G+lE vfe•t'C �j .A,a.o�a.,.n.,.a.,e •na,.uem+mmm J` ............. D 1 2 3 4O 5 'ii:3i.: 7e-7' rowland+broughton .,�n;reomreiemn ees,N,/rnrenorde:;yn r-tr tz�trr era tss 2natrr 234a 1wpWm ave 1830 hleke rt,Ge 200 wpen,m 81811 d..."rn 80202 970544.9008 0 303.308.1373 0 970.544.39731 303,308.1375f (N)METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF,TYP. (E)WOOD BEAM,TYP. (E)CHIMNEY BEYOND r _ TA.ROOF 1 1a TA.lffIN I I I I APPROXUNE OF GRADE, / \ •/ \ / \ \ OVERHEAD DOOR REF:CML O O OO \ TO TRASH \ // ENCLOSURE I , � TA.FlN Fl_ ......... ....... .... 1 Iwue: APPROX UNE OF I I FOUNDATION BEYOND, )WOOD EAM,TYP. I ( I 2013.12.16 __ ____ DO-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS TYP. E)WOOD OLUMN,TYP. --- ---------------------- -- --� 2014.01.08 E)WOOD IDING I I yp DD-CO NSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS 2014.01.20 I i I i DD-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS LOW MNIPA-- -- ------------------------------------ 1— ��llly CD-CONSTRUCT ON DOCUMENTS I I _--- ------- ---------- --------- - _--__-_______ _------------___-�_ ECEIVED PROPOSED 1 SOUTH ELEVATION MAR 2 0 2014 A4.2 scALE vis=1m ITY OF ASPE-N-._... COR 1TY DEVELOPMENT 5 4 3 2 1 0 74-T• W-T 1ir tsa zrB taBtrr r-tr RED MOUNTAIN ROAD RESIDENCE (E)CHIMNEY N)METALSTANDING 110 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD GRESS SEAM ROOF,TYP. r _ ro.ROOF a ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 ELF • T.O. ROOF EL.1aA 1? of G0L E)WOOD BEAM,TYP. .<<G Oq \ _ TO.NEW GARAGE�-3 ROOF� �P L.11E 8' (E)WOOD RAIL I I (E)WOOD SIDING NEEDED REPAIR * �,y4O'tW(✓�GD/� ; '/ ♦ '� �) (E)CONCRETE —— FD ARO I 4 = WALL -- � -- I I T.O.FlN.FL. EL.100-9- _ PROJECT NO: 21350 9 7 DWG FILE: O PATIOBEYOND 21350_A4.1.tlw APPROX LINE OF POOL DECK SHEET TITLE I _ o FIN,L PROPOSED EL. A —r ------ ii LGRESS ---- — -- ----------- ------ � uNDATIONBEYOND, ELEVATIO N------------ --- __ _ ---- TYP.DRESS — E)WOOD COLUMN AND REPLAC WALL VENT SCALE:3/16"=1'-0" BRACE,TYP. s A4.2 PROPOSED 2 NORTH ELEVATION M2 eaue vlfr.r4r el .b��,,...,•,...o •rua.,nw:..m.o,m ft rowland+brouga+••hton .�e..�TAM a..�nnr. toe 280ep�/IY�M ,8299YD>tI.AY,SO �M,ae 8NI11 Arlw,as!0982 LINE OF GUARDRAIL O7B.Of4.iB920 8N12M.1A/8e NEW TWO BEYOND-SETAT W0.89{21731 30.3116,1511f fL1Y GARAGE CODE MIN.HEIGHT A 4 PER IRC 3122 )B8 A _ I � y d ta99�9101M0 AnoN mr� b Anon OR b ELEVATION 7871.12=ARCH IW-O' cl 1 SITE SECTION DIAGRAM-DOUBLE GARAGE Al2 SCALE Ire•=1'-0 lewc 2013.12.16 DD-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2014.01.06 DO-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2014.01.20 DD-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2014.03.02 CO-CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS :2W-4 12' LINE OF GUARDRAIL BEYOND-SET AT b Q NEWSWGLE CODE MIN.HEIGHT PER IRC 312.2 h 2 o � Tp O flEVATION b naa b ELEVATION 7871.12.ARCH lW-Ir O 2 SITE SECTION DIAGRAM-SINGLE GARAGE RED MOUNTAIN ROAD A1.2 SCALE Ire•-ra , BLDPE RESIDENCE 110 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 I to I Of COLON WA EtOS1iNa I i0mil I fi i 1 V b R J.�EYATIW PROJECT NO: b 21350 DWG FM 2135Df,-1Aw9 Y SHEET TITLE b PROPOSED SITE $ . SECTION DIAGRAMS ' SCALE Ire•=1'-0= j 3 SITE A SECTION DIAGRAM-LIVING AREA n A1 .2 = A1.2 SCALE: ,re•=r-o• t LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: r Name: Y LL C % 0 V t9 009AY tl. Lvv"& l� 0 Location: REQ MOU 92W ROM; AMMven ka, of Q03 �A o Indicate street address, lot&block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) - - 13-002 REPRESENTATIVE: J� n Name: 'f Q r A to Llj Address: i Phone#: �7 p PROJECT: Name: &U.9 fdtEW L M Address: LO EO+ purl -0 Phone#: ?J (7 a I y q' TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Conceptual Historic Devt. ❑ Special Review ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Final Historic Development ❑ Design Review Appeal ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ Minor Historic Devt. ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final SPA(& SPA Amendment) ❑ Historic Demolition ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Subdivision ❑ Historic Designation ESA-8040 Greenline,51m= ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Markin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane-tx�4tror ❑ Lot Split ❑ Temporary Use ❑ Other: ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Text/1\4ap Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals, etc.) get- ACcb P"44( 5;(*-V cY PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc.) �► ra tBtT fi 0 2014 H e you attached the following? FEES DuE: $ 1:Ll re-Application Conference Summary Attachment#1, Signed Fee Agreement v esponse to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment#4, Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Reviey,Standards '�. i, , -11 All plans that are larger than 8.5"x 11"must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text(Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Ct` Y ;i it A o rEN COMMUNITY DEVEI.t�MENT � i:t 1�`1 8 � �� I + a®22 . z C) ILI . jq SL� L4 Rec44 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: it RW&0170a 40 Mk 9 90?fqJ Applicant: 11,D V.ALftLAJ LLC'i c Uvto Mom Location: Zone District: R-15AI PQ Lot Size: q0, SF Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 13 1t Proposed: YI/K Number of residential units: Existing: I Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: 4 Proposed% of demolition(Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: O � Floor Area: Existing:9llowable: �0o R Proposed. Principal bldg. height: Existing:/V2?1-T1 Allowable: olS+ Proposed.• Access. bldg. height: Existing. t4 Ja _Allowable: :ZS� Propose& On-Site parking: Existing: _Required: Proposed: j+ % Site coverage: Existing. (hl 9VIequired.• kA Proposed. % Open Space: Existing:(1yS%T6M9%Require&?1b RWM@Sj-'Proposed:_ Front Setback: Existing: > G' Required: ;' Proposed: >a5-1 Rear Setback: Existing: > 10' Required: tD' Proposed: >10' Combined F/R: Existing: _Required.• rt Proposed.4_ EASrSide Setback: Existing: 710, Required.• � Proposed: >10, WoSide Setback: Existing: •�Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: N A Required: N LA Proposed:f` Existing non-conformities or encroachments: �r11�T1VE W•cyl1 G y/t�t7=2•9'90t� w► e�_e 0 RIQuI koc> Variations requested: AOAE 7014 (gy 01: AS E N� C Wy t y I e r CITY OF ASPEN Permit Receipt RECEIPT NUMBER 00035672 Account Number: 29737 Date: 3/20/2014 Applicant: 110 VALHALLA,LLC Type: check #4783 Permit Number Fee Description Amount 0022.2014.ASLU Planning Hourly Fees 1,300.00 0022.2014.ASLU Eng Referral Fee 265.00 0022.2014.ASLU Parks Referral Fee 650.00 Total: $2,215.00 THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date. March 25, 2014 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0022.2014.ASLU — 110 Red Mountain Road, Stream Margin Exemption. Your planner assigned to the case is Sara Nadolny. ❑ Your Land Use Application-is incomplete: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. )4Your Land Use Application is complete: if there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, MN ennif Nielan, Deputy Director City of spen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New SPA New PUD Yes No Subdivision, SPA, or PUD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging