Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.265 Exhibition Ln.A030-01 .~ CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID # CASE NAME PROJECT ADDRESS PLANNER CASE TYPE OWNER/APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED BY ,-" A030-01 2735-143-16015 McCormick Highlands PUD amendment to add ADU Lot 15, Block G, Highlands PUD James Lindt PUD Amendment John McCormick 7/10/01 Reso. 31-2001 Approved 8/6/01 J. Lindt 1"""'., t"\. "" Cl () Notice of Decision Insubstantial Planned Unit Development Amendment John McCormick, owner of a property located at Lot 15, Block G, Highlands PUD, Parcel Identification Number 2735-143-16-015, has applied for administrative approval of an Insubstantial Amemdment to the Aspen Highlands PUD to utilize the more accurate ground survey dated August 30, 2001 as the accepted grade on this lot, as is shown on Exhibit B. This amends an earlier approval in which a survey dated May 30,2001 was approved as accepted grade. The Community Development Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a land use application for an insubstantial PUD amendment pursuant to Sections 26.445.100 (A) and 26.304 of the Aspen Municipal Code if an application is found to b.e consistent with the following review criteria: 1. The proposed amendment to the Aspen Highlands Planned Unit Development meets the criteria of Section 26.445.100 (A), PUD Insubstantial Amendments. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION The Community Development Director finds that the proposed amendment to the Aspen Highlands PUD to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby approves the insubstantial PUD amendment on this j!l!:::..day of ;; r:l C,.;./ , 2001. ~ ~lie Ann Woods, Community Development Director EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist Exhibit B: Ground Survey Dated August 30, 2001 1""\ f) Notice of Decision Insubstantial Planned Unit Development Amendment John McCormick, owner of a property located at Lot 15, Block G, Highlands PUD, Parcel Identification Number 2735-143-16-015, has applied for administrative approval of an Insubstantial Amendment to the Aspen Highlands PUD to amend the approved building envelope as is shown on Exhibit B and to utilize the more accurate ground survey as accepted grade on this lot, as is shown on Exhibit D. The Community Development Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a land use application for an insubstantial PUD amendment pursuant to Sections 26.445.100 (A) and 26.304 of the Aspen Municipal Code if an application is found to be consistent with the following review criteria: 1. The proposed amendment to the Aspen Highlands Planned Unit Development meets the criteria of Section 26.445.100 (A), PUD Insubstantial Amendments. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION The Community Development Director finds that the proposed amendment to the Aspen Highlands PUD to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby approves the insubstantial PUD amendment on this -iA-day of .f ...I) , 2001. EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist Exhibit B: Application & Amended Building Envelope Exhibit C: Letter from Owner of Neighboring Lot 16, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village Exhibit D: Request to Use Ground Survey & Ground Survey -4PPA OV€'D JUt.. COt.t4fI.lN;Ty 9 2001 -.. DtVt, ClTyO[: v, "'<, ASPeN I DliitC lOR J ie Ann Woods, Community Development Director 1"""\ 1"""\ . J EXHIBIT A Case No. Parcel ID No. Reviewed By A030-01 2735-143-16-015 James Lindt Zone District R-15 PUD Date 6/18/01 Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist 26. 445.100 Review Criteria All insubstantial PUD Amendments shall meet the following criteria, pursuant to Section }6.445.100, Amendment to PUD Development Order: ~ The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development. ~ The proposed amendment does not increase by greater than three (3) percent the overall coverage of structures on the land. ~ The proposed amendment does not substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. aV The proposed amendment does not decrease the approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. r/' The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by greater than one (I) percent. r/ The proposed amendment does not reduce required pavement widths or rights-of- way for streets and easements. r::i" The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial building by greater than two (2) percent. ~ The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the development by greater than one (1) percent. ~ The proposed amendment will not enact a change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation ofthe project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. R I PH HIGHlHnDI V III H G { Po.Box5115 Aspen, Colorado 81612 (970) 920.1710 Fax (970) 920.3955 ",.... r t1 April 16, 2001 Julie Allll Woods Community Development Director City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Julie Ann, Thank you for meeting with John McCormick, Charles Culllliffc, Matt Stokes, James Lindt, and me on March 30 to review the discrepancy in aerial and ground surveys on Maroon Neighborhood Lot 15 at Aspen HigWands Village. Per your recommendation, I am forwarding you a survey that illustrates the contours as depicted in Aspen Highlands Village PUD reference drawing L.204 generated by aerial survey and the contours as depicted by a recent ground survey. It is typical that aerial surveys may have a margin of error of approximately 2 - 4 feet, and that ground surveys more accurately depict the land's topography. In fact, we find this to be true in this case. Please accept this letter as a formal request for your approval to use of the more accurate ground survey contours (in red) as the base line for building height measurement rather than the aerial survey (in yellow) for the home designed for this lot. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, \ ~~rJ. David Norden Cc: John McCormick, Charles Cunniffe ........~"- "'-"", ."",~, 0/\ pp~f()\J~ & 7 / 0 MEMORANDUM ~ ! TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Directo Joyce OWson, Deputy Directo~ FROM: James Lindt, Acting Zoning Officer -;51-- RE: Aspen Highlands Village PUD Amendment - Public Hearing DATE: July 10,2001 ApPLICANT /OWNER: John McCormick REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Guffey, Charles Cunniffe Architects LOCATION: 0265 Exhibition Lane, Lot 15, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development CURRENT ZONING: R-15 PUD CURRENT LAND USE: Vacant Lot PROPOSED LAND USE REQUEST: Amendment to the Planned Unit Development [IlLA4? .- <, Ll9 SUMMARY: Applicant wishes to obtain an amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of constructing an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development. The approved PUD only allows for ten ADU's to be constructed on lots in which the property owners were conveyed certificates for these Caretaker Units from Hines Highlands Limited Partnership. This would be the eleventh ADU in the Planned Unit Development. REVIEW PROCEDURE An amendment found to be consistent with or ,an enhancement of the approved final development plan by the Community Development Director, but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public hearing pursuant to Section 26.445.030(C) Step 3. The action by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be considered the final action, unless the decision is appealed to City Council. f""'\ f1 , j STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant, John McCormick, represented by Charles Cuniffe Architects, requests an amendment to the Aspen HigWands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of constructing an eleventh ADU within the PUD. Ten ADU's were originally approved to be constructed within the PUD. Thelots that were allowed to receive the ADU's were established by Hines Highlands Limited Partnership through a certificate program. Hines received certificates from the County to construct the ten ADU's within the PUD, and then Hines was able to convey the certificates to the property owners in the PUD as they saw fit. Hines claims that there was no monetary payment received by them for the certificates and that they were conveyed on a first come, first serve basis. The applicant is asking for an amendment to allow for an ADU to be constructed on his single- family lot at Highlands. The applicant was unable to obtain one of the ten ADU Certificates, but has received a letter from Hines Highlands Inc. (Exhibit E) authorizing him to apply for the PUD Amendment to allow for the ADU. Allowing for more ADU's at Highlands is supported by many of the Housing goals and policies set forth in the Aspen Area Community Plan. More specifically, allowing ADU's on the single-family lots would "encourage development to occur within the Aspen Community Growth Boundary" and would also "encourage greater participation by the private sector in affordable housing". Staff feels that allowing for more ADU's would also further the Aspen Area Community Plan Housing Policy that calls for the City to "celebrate our diversity by reflecting it in our housing inventory" and to "avoid housing developments that inadvertently create segregation". Staff feels that the Highlands PUD should be amended to allow for the City's ADU program to be implemented, allowing for voluntary ADU's to be approved at an administrative level on all single-family lots in the PUD. However, staff can not initiate a PUD amendment to allow for City's ADU program to be implemented without Hines' authorization. Staffhas been unable to obtain this authorization at the current time. Staff believes that the impacts of the PUD Amendment to allow for an additional ADU to be built on the applicant's lot would be very minor. An off-street parking space is required per the HigWands PUD Guidelines, which would prevent the additional resident from parking on the street. Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the Aspen HigWands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of allowing for an ADU to be built on Lot 15, Block G of the HigWands PUD. The PUD Amendment would allow for Mr. McCormick to construct an ADU within the dimensional requirements set out in the HigWands Village PUD and allow for the ADU to be constructed per the City's ADU design guidelines pursuant to section 26.520 of the City Land Use Code. 2 1"""\ ,'"' / RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Amendment to the Aspen HigWands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of allowing an eleventh ADU to be constructed pursuant to Section 26.520 of the Land Use Code, on Lot 15, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village PUD. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE PROPOSED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No~, Series of 2001, approving the Amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of allowing for an eleventh ADU to be constructed pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.520, on Lot 15, Block G, of the Aspen Highlands Village PUD." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Parcel Location Exhibit C -- Development Application Exhibit D -- Letter from Hines Authorizing and Supporting the Application 3 ~, , ,I) EXHIBIT A HIGHLANDS PUD AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. 2. The proposed development shall he consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. 4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exemptfrom GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PUD development plan review. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the AACP and the existing land uses in the surrounding areas in that there are already ADU's that are approved within the PUD. Staff finds that the proposed amendment furthers the AACP goal of providing more employee housing within the limits of the Urban Growth Boundary. Staff finds the criterion to be met. B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for all properties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040, above. The dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character oj, and compatibility with, existing and expectedfuture land uses in the surrounding area. b) Natural or man-made hazards. 4 ,......., ~ c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical resources. Staff Finding The approved types ofland uses will not be changed. Accessory Dwelling Units are already allowed within the PUD to a limited number. Staff feels that the additional traffic and demand for transit will be minimal. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate andfavorable to the character of the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed amendment will not reduce the open space nor increase the site coverage. Detached ADU's are not allowed on Block G per the HigWands Village PUD. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the following considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-residential land uses. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activity centers in the city. Staff Finding Staff finds that parking demand will be met because the ADU design standards require that one off-street parking space be created and designated for the ADU resident in addition to the parking for the primary residences. There are also RFT A bus stops nearby to provide alternative forms of transportation. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: 5 , ,-., tJ a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road maintenance to the proposed development. StaffPinding Staff finds this criterion does not apply to this application. 5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mud flow, rockfalls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surrounding area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical naturalfeatures of the site. Staff Finding Staff finds this criterion does not apply to this application. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if: a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AA CP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. 6 1"""\ (""\ , Staff Finding Accessory Dwelling Units are not counted as units of density per the land use code. Staff finds that ADU's are encouraged by the Aspen Area Community Plan and that affordable housing units constructed within the Urban Growth Boundary are compatible with the surrounding land uses. Staff finds this criterion to be met. c. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. 2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. 3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service vehicle access. 5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided. 6. Site drainage is accommodatedfor the proposed development in a practical and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. 7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately designed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the use. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed amendment will not affect the open space or setbacks because there is an approved building envelope already in place on the lot. The ADU will also be located within the dimensional requirements of the approved Aspen Highlands Village PUD. 7 ,-.., - ""- j D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and with existing and proposedfeatures of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well-designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. 3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is appropriate. Staff Finding Staff finds that this criterion does not apply to this application. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a buildingfor its purposes, legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes, which may significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: 1. Be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indicative oj, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. 2. Incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems. 3. Accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. 8 1'""<: I) Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed amendment does not change the architectural character of the residence. Staff finds this criterion to be met. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished: 1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner. 2. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibitedfor residential development. Staff Finding The applicant must meet the outdoor lighting requirements set forth in the Highlands Village PUD. Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable to this application. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: 3. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's builtform, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses and property users of the PUD. 4. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (notfor a number of years) to each IIJ{or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. 5. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrumentfor the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and sharedfacilities together with a deed restriction againstfuture residential, commercial, or industrial development. 9 ,...., ~ ; 8taffFinding Staff finds this criterion does not apply to this application. H. Utilities and Public facilities. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose an undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public facilities associated with the development shall comply with thefollowing: 1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the development. 2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer. 3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the additional improvement. Staff Finding Staff finds that adequate public infrastructure exists to serve the additional unit that would be created by this amendment. Staff finds this criterion to be met. I. Access and Circulation. (Only standards 1&2 apply to Minor PUD applications) The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible, does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the following criteria: 1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. 2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be improved to accommodate the development. 3. Areas of historic pedestrian or recreational trail use, improvements oj, or connections to, the bicycle and pedestrian trail system, and adequate access to significant public lands and the rivers are provided through dedicated public trail easements and are proposed for appropriate improvements and maintenance. 4. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan and adopted specific plans regarding recreational trails, pedestrian and bicycle 10 1"""\ tj paths, and transportation are proposed to be implemented in an appropriate manner. 5. Streets in the PUD which are proposed or recommended to be retained under private ownership provide appropriate dedication to public use to ensure appropriate public and emergency access. 6. Security gates, guard posts, or other entryway expressions for the PUD, or for lots within the PUD, are minimized to the extent practical. Staff Finding Staff finds that the proposed amendment does not affect the vehicular circulation because an off-street parking space is required for each ADU unit. Staff finds this criterion to be met. J. Phasing of Development Plan. (does not apply to Conceptual PUD applications) The purpose of this criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners and impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. lj phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adoptedfinal PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the following: 1. All phases, including the initial phase, shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. 2. The phasing plan describes physical areas insulating, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. 3. The proposed phasing plan ensures the necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in- lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the PUD, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures are realized concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. Staff Finding Staff finds this criterion does not apply to this application. 11 ~ c: .- CJ > CI) 3 c: o .- ~ ..Q .- ~ Q ,.."" ~ t) z V1 ~ r"\. r:-'\ State of Colorado Space Above Tltis Line For Recording Data DEED OF TRUST (With Future Advance Clause) 1. DATE AND PARTIES. The date of this Deed cfTrust (Security Instrument) is ".~~,.~.lr...f.9.Q.Q......... and the parties, their addresses and tax identification numbers, if required, are as follows: GRANTOR: JOHN MCmRMICK I'D rox 2974 ASPEN, CD 81612 JOHN T. M=RMICK I'D rox 2974 ASPEN, CD 81612 o If checked. refer to the attached Addendum incorporated herein, lor' additional Grantors, their signatures and acknowledgments. TRUSTEE: PUBLIC TRUSIEE OF PITKIN CDONTY LENDER: CJ:lViMUNIIY BANKS OF CDlDRAIX> ORGANIZED AND ElaSTIN} UNDER THE I.I\WS OF THE STATR OF CDWRAro 210 NORlH MILL STREET ASPEN, CD 81611 T7CKPAYER I.D. #: 84-0638700 2. CONVEYANCE. For good and valuable. consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, and to secure the Secured Debt (defined below) and Grantor's performance under this Security Instrument, Grantor irrevocably grants, conveys and sells to Trustee, in trust for the be,neftt of Lender, with power of sale, the following described property: r.m 15, = G.<....THE ASPEN HIGHlANDS VILIAGE P.U.D., ACCDRDIN} 10 THE PlAT 1HEREl)F RECDRDl>lJ =BER 15, 1998 IN FIAT B:X>K 47 AT PAGE 1 AS RECEPITCN NO. 423275. CDONTY OF PITKIN, SThTR OF CDWRAro. The property is located in .l?;I;00N.................................................... at ..................................,....... (County) ...q~~;;..~!l);nPN. .~;........ ....... .... ..... .l\Rl?lli....... ............. ......... .... Colorado. m,9.U.......... (Address) (City) (ZIP Code) Together with all rights, easements, appurtenances, royalties, mineral rights, oil and gas rights, all water and riparian rights, ditches, and water stock and all existing and future improvements, structures, fixtures, and replacements that may now, or at any time in the future, be part of the real estate described above (all referred to as .'Propeny.'). 3. MA..XIl\.fUM OBLIGATION LIMIT. The total principal amount secured by this Security Instrument at anyone time shall not exceed $ :4J::g~(.QQQ:.Q.Q...........".................... . This limitation of amount does not include interest and other fees and charges validly made pursuant to this Security Instrument. Also, this limitation does not apply to advances made under the terms of this Security Instrument to protect Lender's security and to perform any of the covenants contained in this Security Instrument. 4. SECURED DEBT AND FUTURE ADY ANCES. The term "Secured Debt" is defined as follows: A. Debt incurred under the terms of all promissory note(s), contract(s), guaranty(s) or other evidence of debt described below and all their extensions, renewals, modifications or substitutions. (When referencing the debts below it is suggested that you include items such as borrowers' names, note amounts, interest rates, maturity dates, etc.) PRCMISSORY NOIE NUMBER 88571505 DATED DECEMBER 21 J.....2000 IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AIVDUNT OF $200,000.00 = JOHN MCCDRMIU<. AS OORROWER AND CJ:lViMUNIIY BANKS OF mWRAro AS LENDER. COLORAOO . DEEO OF TRUST lNOT FOR FNMA. FHLMC, FHA OR VA USEl ~Of41 Il:lt994 B~nkers Systems. Inc.. St. Clcud, MN Form R(;.DT_CO 10123198 i> r') ,,,, " r) &h; b J' + \\C/( OTIS, WALKER (~:j'tfCCORMICK REAL ESTATE March 26,2001 R.E. Lot IS G Maroon Neighborhood Aspen Highlands Village PUD Application to increase the number of ADU (caretaker) units from 10 to 11. Minor PUD amendment. Proposal: The applicant would like to build an ADU unit in an area of the house that would not affect nor require any adjustment to the FAR. See accompanying architectural floor plans. This is consistent with the relvant standards: A) N! A B) The proposal does not change the use. C) ADU units were anticipated, desirable and are permitted. D) The proposed activity does not i) Change the basic character of the approved use of the land- it will not require any increase in the size of the house. There will be no off site impact Public health, safety and welfure will not be affected On site parking will be handled easily (one car) by a space to south of the house. Affordable housing generation will be positively affected There will be no affect on FAR. ii) iii) iv) ~V) , ,//\ '-" 302 E. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-4500 Fax (970) 920-1085 (800) 598-7147 Email: oandw@sopris.net Website: www.otisandwalker.com A I P{ n HIGHlHnDI V III H G f r"'; Ey 11 ~b;+ "Dr! (j June 21, 2001 RECEiVED JUN 25 '1 ASPEN/PitKIN ~DEvELOPMENT James Lindt Community Development Office City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear James, Please accept this letter as our authorization for John McCormick, owner of Aspen Highands Village Maroon Neighborhood Lot 15, to proceed with an application to amend the Aspen Highlands Village PUD for the addition of an ADU to his proposed home. Per your request, I have researched and confirmed that the 10 certificates issued with prior lot sales at Aspen Highlands were offered at no cost to the lot buyer. In addition, no cost premium was placed on lots that were sold with the certificate. We recommend that Mr. McCormick's application be reviewed at the administrative level. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns you have regarding this matter. Sincerely, R0.Box5115 CJ--:::;52..).,..;. Aspen, Colorado \ 81612 David Norden (970) 920-1710 Fax (970) 920-3955 Cc: John McCormick r-., i'\ iJ .~ ";h ,.r) "'", '. "<> "'.., ;.s.<_~ +- . J :J? vJ+ ;l~ J (\ '" '- "VIG- . ,'->....,...... ,-':'".;til;~ " ,::-~}1f-t~;';~.~.~ .,':. '. -"~~.i:1b:0_L;~_; ~ ',//:1- '.: '1'(0' .. ij;\l .::.';,:::~.':.:;~ .' .- .. ;f<. "'-",-, ". o t""'j RftEIVED ;)~ JUN 0 8 2001 i\~~C" I ~III11N (,'OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R.E. Review Standards Lot 15 Block G Aspen Highlands PUD ADU application John McCormick: applicant A. General Requirements 1) Application compatible with all aspects of the Aspen Area Community Plan. 2) There are other ADU units in the area. 3) The surrounding area will not be adversely affected; the ADU will not require any changes to the house footprint. 4) Exempt from GMQS B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements 1) The proposed dimensional requirements comply. 2) Yes 3) One off street parking space will be created for the ADU 4) Infrastructure is adequate 5) The site is suitable 6) The community encourages ADU's; the site does not have any constraints which may make the ADU difficult to incorporate. The development is compatible with the surrounding development pattern. C. Site Design Proposed development complies with PUD D. Landscape Plan Proposed development complies with Highlands and City of Aspen landscaping guidelines. E. Architectural Character Proposed development complies with HigWands and City of Aspen architectural guidelines. F. Lighting All lighting will comply with the Outdoor Lighting standards. G.N/A . 26.445.050 "...,., , 1""1 'J 26.445.050 Review Standards: Conceptual, Final, Consolidated, and Minor PUD. A development application for Conceptual. Final, Consolidated Concepmal and Final, or Minor POO shall comply with the following standards and requirements. Due to the limited issues associ- ated with Conceptual Reviews and propenies eligible for Minor POO Review, certain standards shall not be applied as noted. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application, and its confonnity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this title. A. General requirements. 1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. 2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development of the sur- rounding area. 4. "'.e proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is exempt from ,'QS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development and wu; be considered prior to, or in combination with, final PlID development plan review. B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements: Tne final pun development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for all proper- ties within the PUD as described in General Provisions, Section 26.445.04D, above. The di- me-r.": 'nal requirements of the underlying zone district shall be used as a guide in determining th,. . ,. propriate dimensions for the PUl). During review of the proposed dimensional require- mnts, compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized. The proposed dimensional requirements shall comply with the following: 1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate and compatible with the following influences on the property: a) The character of, and compatibility with. existing and expected future land uses in the surrounding area. b) Natural orman-made hazards. c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area such as steep slopes. waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and landforms. d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian circulation, parking, and historical re- sources. 2. The proposed dimensional requirements pennit a scale, massing, and quantity of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of the proposed POO and of the surrounding area, (Aspen 4.100} 584 ., r", i) 26.445.050 to public spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may signifi- canty represent the character of the proposed development. There shall be approved as part of the final development plan an architectural character plan, which adequately depicts the char- acter of the proposed development. The proposed architecture of the development shall: 1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city, appropriately relate to exist- ing and proposed architecture of the property, represent a character suitable for, and indica- tive of, the intended use, and respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources. 2. incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use of non- or less-intensive me- chanical systems. 3. accommodate the storage and shedding of snow, ice, and water in a safe and appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance. F. Lighting. The purpose of this standard to ensure the exterior of the development will be lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general aesthetic concerns. The follow- ing standards shall be accomplished: 1. All lighting is proposed so as tD prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site features, structures, and access ways is pro- posed in an appropriate manner. 2. All exterior lighting shall in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Standards unless oth- erwise approved and noted in the final PUD documents. Up-lighting of site features, build- ings, landscape elements, and lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohib- ited for residential development. G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area. If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD, the following criteria shall be met: 1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed development, considering existing and pro- posed structures and natural landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's built form, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses and property users of the PUD. 2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner. 3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through a legal instrument for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential, commercial, or industrial development. 587 (Aspeo4.lOO) ~JlJlt.iJB:ZUUl -r II Ii. . UU A~ t""'"i 'At: NU. r. U2 26.445.050 t""'"i , I Notes; a) Lot sizes for indi vidual lots within a POO may be established at a higher or lower rate than specified in the underlying zone district as long as, on average, the entire pun confonns to the maximum density provisions of the respective zone dislnct or as otherwise established as the maximum allowable den>ity pursuant to a Final PT.i']) Development Plan. b) The approved dimensional requirements for all lots within the PT.)D are required to be re- flected in the final POD development pllll1s. ,..~-......". C. Site Design. The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PtID enhances public spaces, is complimentary to the site's natural and man.made features and the adjacent public spaces, and ensures the pub- lic's health and safety. The proposed development shall comply with the following: 1. Existing na~..llal or man-made features of the site Which are unique, provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or oontribute to the identity of the town are pn;served or enhanced in an appropriate man..:er. 2. StrUctures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open spaces and vistas. 3. Structures are appropriately Oriented to public Sm:els, contribute to the urban Or rural con- text where appropriate, and provide visual interest and engagement of vehicular and pedes- trian movement. 4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency and service ve- hicle access. 5. Adequate pedestrilL'l and handicapped access is provided. 6. Site drainage is acCommodated for the proposed development in a practical and reasonable ,,__ manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. 7_ For non-residential land uses. spaces bet\\ieen buildings are appropriately designed to ac- COmmodate any programmatic functions associated with the use. D. Landscape Plan. The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed landscape with the vi.- ual character of the city, with surrounding parcels. and with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed development shall comply ."lith the follOwing: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designated treatment of exterior spaces, preserves exist- ing significant vegetation, md provides an ample quamity and variety of ornamental plant spedes suitable for the Aspen area climate. 2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide uniqueness and in~ rerest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate manner. 3. Tnc proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape features is ap- propriate. E. Architectural Character. It is the purpose of this standard is to encourage architectural interest, variety, character, and visual identity in rhe proposed development and within the City while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based upon the suitability of a building for its purposes. legibility of the building's use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation ~.' (.~~n.":'/OOl 586 ("') f") 26.445.050 3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the fol- lowing considerations: a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed development including any non-resiclentialland uses. b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking is proposed. c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development. d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and general activ- ity centers in the city. 4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum density of a PVD may be reduced if: a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other utilities to service the proposed development. b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal, and road main- tenance to the proposed development. 5. The maximum allowable densitv within a P1:.JD mav be reduced if there exists natural haz- , , ards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if: a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground instability or the possibility of mud flow, rock falls or avalanche dangers. b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water pollution. c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in the surround- ing area and the City. d) The design and location of any proposed Structure, road, driveway, or trail in the pro- posed development is not compatible with the terrain or causes harmful disturbance to critical natural features of the site. 6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a signifi- cant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical con- straints. Specifically, the maximum density of a PlJD may be increased if: a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area plan to which the property is subject. b) The site's phYSical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those characteristics mitigated. c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics. 585 (Aspen .uoo) ~ r"\ I~ ~ 26.445.060 1. All phases, including the initial phase, shall be designed to function as a complete devel- opment and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. 2. The phasing plan describes physical areas insulating, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. 3. The proposed phasing plan ensures the necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the PTJD, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures are realized concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. 26.445.060 Application Materials. A. Conceptual Development Plan. The contents of a development application for a conceptual development plan shall include the following: 1. The general application information required in Common Procedures, Section 26.304. 2. A Site Improvement Survey depicting: a) Existing natural and man-made site features. b) Existing topography and categorization of site slopes falling within the thresholds de- scribed in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040. c) All legal easements and restrictions. 3. A conceptual description and site plan of the proposed development including a statement of the objectives to be achieved by the P1:.JD and a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation, off-street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 4. A conceptual architectural character plan generally indicating the use, massing, scale, and orientation of the proposed buildings. 5. A conceptual landscape plan generally describing the type, location, and size of existing and proposed landscape features. 6. A general description of the dimensional requirements being considered. 7. A written response to each of the PUD Review Criteria contained in section 25.445.050. B. Final, Consolidated, and Minor Development Plan. The contents of the development application for a Final, Consolidated Conceptual and Final, and Minor development plan shall include the following: 1. The general application information required in Common Procedures, Section 26.304. 2. A Site Improvement Survey depicting: a) Existing natural and man-made site features. b) Existing topography and categorization of site slopes falling within the thresholds de- scribed in General Provisions, Section 26.445.040. c) All legal easements and restrictions. 589 (Aspen 4/00) '" 1"""\ ,......., , I PUBLIC NOTICE RE: ASPEN IDGHLANDS VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR AN ELEVENTH ACCESSORY DwELLING UNIT TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITIDN THE ASPEN IDGHLANDS VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELO}>MENT ON LOT 15, BLOCK G, ASPEN IDGHLANDS VILLAGE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 10,2001 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by John McCormick requesting an amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village Planned Unit Development to allow for an eleventh ADU to be constructed within the Aspen Highlands Village on Lot 15, Block G. The property is commonly known as 265 Exhibition Lane and is legally described as Lot 15, Block G, Aspen Highlands Village. For further information, contact James Lindt at the AspenlPitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920- 5441, jamesl@ci.aspen.co,us. slBob Blaich, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on June 23, 2001 ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ City of Aspen Account G:/planninglaspenlnotices/moorerezone.doc JUN. 22. 2001 '2:53PM Amn H'~"lRnDi Vmm u i " Ii ., :! " ., HINES ASPEN HIGHLANDS VILLAGE I""'>. . -NO.7IO--'--P. 1--'- i""'\ Fax Cover Sheet To; 1M.c.'1 U~-r Company: Fax No: ~~ ,. 4<lz,,,\ From: Mattf1ew V. Stokes - Hines \. Date: 0/ '2IV , 1- Pages: . Art original hard copy oflhis transmission Dwm Dwm not be Senf separately_ ! r; yoU do not receive an pages. please can NOTICE 0; CONl'lDEM'lAUTY, Th. i.,_.. .""",,d In..it FAX Is ~nlid..tioJ ..<lI.r privil'iOll. Thil FAX Is klfOlIdod 10 be re"__ illilblty ~y .nly'" indillid""Nn1od above. !r/h, rIodc:r .'II11s 11WoIsMtTrAl. MaE is not Ill. flI""'dod ....~....~ or repres.,,,.dve or",. 1....d.4 ....P....~)'OU.re .m.y n.d6cd Illot n.y ...;ew. disscminoJi.., or ."Pl'i"l o/;tIli. ;1J(.r tl:c illlbrm:ld.n ~"'t.cd ".",i. i. ptOhibircd. It)'Gu reooiYcl!ll$ FIJ( I. ....... plcost i_..,ly ..<ilY tIl. .."dc:r by Ie'.phone...d .....m lIIis FAX.....scldo<."lI..ddtcubcr..,. n.."" , VI', Fost Office Sox 5115 Alpen, (970) 9201710 /e1-(970) 920 Oocument3 [ I I I I I i , J. Daniel Labs, M.D. 1"""\ 841-435-0?31 ~ p.l J. Daniel Labs, M.D. From: Sent: To: Subject: John McCormick Umacaspen@sopris,netl Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:49 AM hand@gulfaccess.net Highlands To: Aspen :onrnuni~y Developnent From; J Daniel Labs iot 16 Block G Aspen Highlands P:JD R.E. Roof over hang encroacb,,'l!ent on CL:l.l de sa::: side (front of house) of Lot 15 Block G Aspen High:ands PU: I do not oppo8.e specifically said roof overhan:; encr;Jachment Over front door of my ~~:;<hbO~ /P 1~4 /._-'): --0,/ ? . ~---'- €!:../ '" "/ Signed J. Danie: Laos Date RECE'V~D JUN 1 4 2001 ASPEN f P:1 KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 PARKER DAVID W 1/5 CIO HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASPEN, CO 81612 OCONNELL DANIEL S & GLORIA P 16 ROCK RIDGE AVE GREENWICH, CT 06831 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 r"'l HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP POBOX5115 ASPEN, CO 816]2 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC 90% 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 THUNDERBOWL ASPEN LLC 62 READS WAY NEW CASTLE, DE 19720 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP POBOX5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 OXLEY JOHN C 1437 S BOULDER AVE #1475 TULSA, OK 74119-3609 (1 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED i PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP POBOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 BUILDING 7 LLC 59.1672% CIO ASPEN SKIING COMPANY ASPEN, CO 81612 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 CHOPIVSKY GEORGE JR 3217 CATHEDRAL AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20008 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 WILHELM DAVID A & MARY LINDA 165 SAGO PALM RD VERO BEACH, FL 32963 GOULD RICHARD & NANCY 337 CANOE HILL RD NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT 0, COMPANY INC 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 LINDAUER JERRY D & REBBECCA F 2400 PORTOFINO RIDGE DR AUSTIN, TX 78735 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 KRAUSS LAWRENCE & KATHERINE 1/12JT C/O ASPEN HIGHLANDS CONDO ASSOC ORLANDO, FL 32821 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 1"'\ RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT ' ,I COMPANY INC 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO 1NC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC I112 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ADLER RITA N TRUST 3125 HASSI POINT LONGWOOD, FL 32779 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC I112 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 R1TZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT CO INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 1NC 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 WHITE THOMAS & SUSAN 27 S ROYAL FERN DR THE WOODLANDS, TX 77380 AQUA 2322 CORP 301 COSTANERA RD CORAL GABLES, FL 33143 ASPEN HIGHLANDS LOT 7 LLC 8606 ALLISON RD STE 127 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46250 THUNDERBOWL LLLP 28 PARK AVE W 9TH FL MANSFIELD, OH 44902 KLUMP MICHAEL A 2593 DELLWOOD DR ATLANTA, GA 30305 BASS ERWIN LLC PO BOX 5078 ASPEN, CO 81612 GORDON LETICIA B 3663 GRAND AVE UNIT 904 DES MOINES, IA 50312-4369 f"') RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT cof1 INC 1/12 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 HENRIKSEN RONALD W 8831 STABLE LN HOUSTON, TX 77024 HENRIKSEN RONALD W 8831 STABLE LN HOUSTON, TX 77024 JONES & JONES LEASING CO 6301 HAGGERTY RD BELLEVILLE, MI 48111 LOT 9 HIGHLANDS LLC 7104 MELROSE CASTLE LN BOCA RATON, FL 33496 HINES GERALD D 10% 280 POST OAK BLVD HOUSTON, TX 77056 CAM DEVELOPMENT LLC 424 PARK CIR #3 ASPEN, CO 81611 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 LOT 5 HIGHLANDS VILLAGE HOLDINGS LLC CIO HENRY DRUKER NEW YORK, NY 10021 RITZ-CARL TON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC 6649 WESTWOOD CENTER BLVD STE 500 ORLANDO, FL 32821 ASPEN HIGHLANDS LOT 6 LLC 8606 ALLISON RD STE 127 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46250 LAKESHORE PUBLISHING CO 990 GROVE ST EVANSTON, IL 60201 TALLMAN JOSEPH P 380 INCA PKWY BOULDER, CO 80303 MAROON CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1926 CLOVER CT PLEASONTON, CA 94588 LOT 10 HIGHLANDS LLC 7104 MELROSE CASTLE LN BOCA RATON, FL 33496 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 SHANNAHAN CORNELIUS KEVIN & JOAN C 8 EXMOOR LN LINCOLNSHIRE, IL 60069 HINES HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP POBOX 5115 ASPEN, CO 81612 - f"";, A CITY OF ASPEN PR~APPLICATIONCONFERENCESU~r PLANNER: Nick Lelack, 920-5095 DATE: March 20, 2001 PROJECT: Minor POO Amendments to the Aspen Highlands Village POO APPLICANT: John McCormick, 920-4500 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor POO Amendment DESCRIPTION: The applicant would like to increased the number of accessory (caretaker) dwelling units available at the Aspen Highlands Village from 10 to 11. Address Applicable Sections of the LandUse Code & Ordinance 24, Series of 1999 Land Use Code Chapter 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures_ Section 26.480.060(A)(3) and (B), Final Plat requirements_ Ordinance 8, Series of 2000 This ordinance established review criteria to evaluate minor POO amendments for the Aspen Highlands Village POO. These criteria must be addressed in the application. Section 4 - The Community Development Director is hereby authorized to approve minor POO amendments to the Aspen Highlands Village POO which are intended to change an element or condition of the development permit; provided, however, that the proposed amendments are consistent with the following standards: a. The amendment must be a clarification or a technical correction to a plat_ b_ The amendment must not change the use of the proposed development between residential, commercial and tourist accommodation uses. c. The amendment must be consistent with action taken during the review of the original development activity_ d_ The proposed activity does not: i. Change the basic character of the approved use of land on which the activity occurs including basic visual appearance and method of operation; ii_ Increase off-site impacts in the surrounding neighborhood; iii_ Endanger public health, safety or welfare; iv_ Substantially increase the need for on-site parking or utilities, or affect affordable housing generation; and, v. Increase the floor area of the use by more than two (2) percent or decrease open space on the site by more than three (3)percent. I 1"""\ I ", '" 0 c 0'0 """"" ~ /' J~ " )3~"& ""'? O"..-~ """ ""~, "";f--: . ~ ~~ --'- --sl. """ . ~;-"-"- ----.. s'" _. 1"""\ .__.'__--{ ~--~~.--.! o / / o / k oN 0" / / / o o / It; r~' ~~ I:;: -- -- fii --- -,. r~~ . / ..'-.::..-.. I: -"-.. 6';; 'O<:l":t!--..- 5:~ NOJ~V~.- B~ _ --'- --" ~~ w < :;;; ",." 00 \ \ -"- -I ~j H w, ve w . . - -"". -!l_ g...; '"5\\ e; , <->"';;: we. 0 ",;:;,... :3.-- <;i~: ~ -:;4~ s"" _ ~\ ' ",-"n . ~ z :5 &~o~ r\ ~f"SI, ~!31.S U- ~r5ls ~ 0 WN I- Cf)~ 6~ ~~ u~ d;', ,./", ^' () ~r o ~ m en -I ~ o '~,,"'." ".~ "'~ ~ '" ~ en () Cl", J>", . '" 0", !=(J) cO ~ " -i,-i r m < m r LJ 5: z ~ ~ :JJ s:: m o )> :JJ o o s:: -J "' ~ ~ ~ in ~ fJg s:: ~ ~ U> ~ '". "'~_'"_'~"~'""'",__0'~"_ ~"N.~_"""~"'"""''''"'''''''''''',__''C':':,_""'':'";~;"",,,,_' "I- I i 151~ 2:i~ mlz I I I~ ~ ~" I i lil5 n 9 ,,9 ~ ~ ~I 1 I I l> \) A> ~ " s z " CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TEtE; 970.925-5590 . FAX; 970.920-4557 502 MAIN ST. * SUITE 232 . CARBONDALE, CO 81623 . TELE: 970963-6394 . FAX; 970963-6399 220 E. COlORADO AVE.. TELLURIDE, CO 81435 . TElE: 97m8-3738. FAX; 97m8-9567 0105 EDWARDS VILlAGE BLVD" STE A20S . EDWARDS, CO 81632 . TELE; 97M26-6S90. FAX: 970-926-6585 \,1, ,-, , ' , ~ \",,'-- \\ \\L c- O c Z Gl m ~ o (iJ ~I r--- .~i ~~i Sts9-'JW)l6 :XV~ . 06SHZ6o{ll6 ::nU . SOlS 00 'SOlIVMCl3 . sozv :us ~0A1lI mvTIth SOl:lVMCB SOW L9S'HtOOL6:XV~ . 8[lN~6 :11li . sttlll 00 ';ofllr1TT11 . 'VIV 00Vll0l0:>"J on 66E9-E96(ll6 :XV~ . \r6tH964ll6 ::nU. E~l9 00 'J!voNo&wJ . ltt runs . IS NlVW ZOS lS'st-ol6OL6:XVJ . 06SS-5't6(JL6:llll . ll.9W OO'N3dSV . ')IIv 1'M'IAJ-l.1M 019 OO\lllOlO::> 'N3dSV AlNnO::> NIlI!ld saNV1H~IH N3dSV ~ ~ ~ 5S 57 ~ ~ ~ - !/ <( . . ~ ~ I ! ! I " SDl1..IHJ'8V lJJINNnJ S17'8VHJ ~ )[J078 !it 1..07 DN1GIS1'8 )[JIW'80J;J/.'V " ~ !/ g~ BS J./JWJ3J ~ -( -------- ~ ,S \~ \s \<""~ ~.O'a" - " )0- j '........ . ~.' , - l ..... ...........-# I ........ ,....rs ,j .......... '-.('0 ............$ --~ ~ , ... @ to;. \/ , , I: , I , I I / , J.'- - - ..--,.----- ~ ,~ . ~iJ " ~ ::~ "'~ ,~ ~~ tj ~ y ~ <> i-: N ~ <> <> N o N co ~ -, co ~ o ~ ~ ;;: 0.' ......"'.._,,~ . ~ ~ ~- "- :11'. "^"~.: ,,_:r"~.'"' ..: "''"'''''''''''f'."''' ,--'--"~~~"-,, "';~~;:'t;*1W~~'i;~~)~{;<~~~F:'F~~~-~-:~~:'\<','~~)~-~,,[fJ! . ' : tii .'"';1 " " ,:,~" ,