HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.council.worksession.202208161
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
August 16, 2022
4:00 PM, City Council Chambers
427 Rio Grande Place
Aspen, CO 81611
ZOOM MEETING INSTRUCTIONS
Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device:
Please click this URL to join.
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89353930551?pwd=Q3RFMXF2UmJUbVlhQW05OWo4eG15dz0
9
Passcode: 81611
Or join by phone:
Dial:
US: +1 346 248 7799
Webinar ID: 893 5393 0551
Passcode: 81611
International numbers available: https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kKqtQZ3YO
I.WORK SESSION
I.A.Short-Term Rental Tax Polling Results and Next Steps
I.B.Burlingame Early Childhood Education Center Progress Update
1
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM:Sara Ott, City Manager
Pete Strecker, Finance Director
Phillip Supino, Community Development Director
MEMO DATE:August 8, 2022
MEETING DATE:August 16, 2022
RE:Short Term Rental Tax Polling Results and Next Steps
Request of Council: Staff seeks direction on whether the Council wishes to advance development of a
ballot question to tax short term rentals and/or lodging accommodations in the City; what are the uses of
any new revenues; what tax rate should be applied; and in which election the question should be placed
on the ballot.
This evening’s work session is structured to 1) present the findings from the polling by Fredrick Polling, 2)
provide a high-level refresher on the short-term rental employee generation and affordable housing fee
analysis by EPS, and 3) seek Council direction on if, when, and for what any ballot question may be placed
before the City’s voters.
Summary and Background: In December 2021, Council passed Ordinance #26, Series of 2021, addressing
the City’s existing vacation rental program. Ordinance #26 extended existing Vacation Rental Permits,
issued as of December 8, 2021, through September 30, 2022. Pursuant to Ordinance #26, Series of 2021
and Ordinance #27, Series of 2021, no new Vacation Rental Permits were issued after December 8, 2021.
These ordinances, combined with the problem statements, moratorium goals, and legislative rationale for
the declaration of the moratorium form the basis of staff’s work with the community over the intervening
seven months on land use amendments and secondly, the possibility to tax or set new fees for short-term
rentals. This work culminated in the passage of Ordinance 09-2022 on June 28, 2022 to amend the land
use code and establish the vacation rental permit fee.
Concurrently, the Council advanced the discussion of the demand for employees and services short-term
rentals generate in the City and the potential of a tax question to address these demands. This work
included several discussions and community engagement around the finances, tax equity, and impacts of
theshort-term rental products within the City, including in commercial and residential areas. This included
a specific Technical Advisory Committee meeting about taxation on March 17, 2022.
Additionally, at the April 11, 2022 and May 9, 2022 work sessions, the Council directed staff to advance
the analysis of taxation scenarios focused on possible tax rates, who should pay a potential new tax, and
what uses were most appropriate for a new tax. This direction included obtaining voter polling to
understand the voteracceptance of a new tax, the preferred taxation rate, and possible supported uses.
2
Discussion:
Keith Fredrick of Fredrick Polls will present his executive summary and be available to answer questions.
Attached as exhibit A is the polling executive summary, cross tabulations, open ended questions, and
survey questions. Please note that the sample ballot language appears on page 12 of the executive
summary.
Fredrick Polls bottom line summary states:
“A majority of Aspen voters consistently support some form of new STR tax with a hard
core of one-third of voters consistently opposed. That opposition could climb into the mid-
40s if this issue becomes a matter of "fairness" given STR renters already pay the same
sales and lodging tax as visitors staying in hotels.
However, if the focus of this propose STR tax becomes more about equity of private
property being used for commercial purposes paying the same rate as other Aspen
businesses pay, then support for the STR tax is in the mid-to-upper 60s, pushing opposition
to its core minimum.
Short-term rentals and affordable housing are clearly linked in the minds of STR tax
supporters. STRs are seen as contributing to the lack of rental units for residents, the
increasing cost of long-term rentals and the increasing price of buying a home in Aspen...
all undermining the fabric of community as well as impacting quality of neighborhoods
and life in the city.
To the extent this proposed STR tax ballot issue is connected to affordable housing both in
the rate charged and the use of funds generated, the more the majority constituency
supporting an STR tax concept are likely to become YES voters on the November ballot.
Also, it appears the less complex, more straightforward the ballot proposal can be – few
to no variable tax rates – the stronger support for increasing taxes on STR’s becomes.”
Key Policy Considerations: The polling results indicate voter tolerance for some level of affordable
housing mitigation to be incorporated into the tax rate. To support the Council in discussions, Rachel
Shindman of EPS Consulting will provide a high-level overview of the employee generation model for short
term rental properties, and the estimated range for a mitigation fee for each FTE generate. (This study
was originally presented to Council during the May 24
th regular meeting in the context of a possible STR
permit and AH fee.) Staff views this as critical information to understanding the relationship between
potential tax rates and the amount of affordable housing demand mitigated by an STR tax.
POLICY QUESTION #1: Does the Council wish to go forward with a tax?Does the Council wish to include
affordable housing mitigation in the calculation of the tax rate? If yes, how much?
DISCUSSION NEEDED: Doesthe Council desires to mitigate STR employee generation through a portion of
the tax? If so, based on the EPS generation study, what percentage of the generation should be mitigated
through the tax?
POLICY QUESTION #2: Are there other/additional intended uses of the tax to be levied?
3
During previous work sessions and included in the language of the moratorium, Council has expressed
the unfunded impacts associated with the robust short-term rental market that exists within Aspen.
Explicitly stated impacts and costs to affordable housing and childcare, transit and the environment were
all identified as not being mitigated and recovered from the STR sector, and unlike the realities for other
commercially licensed businesses.
Polling indicates all these uses are supported to varying degrees, with affordable housing being the most
supported use. Based upon Council’s discussion the draft ballot language will be adjusted to reflect the
final proposed uses.
DECISION NEEDED: Can Council affirm whether or not these impact areas are aligned with the taxation
question that would be presented to voters? Are there any areas missing or are some areas of higher
priority than others? Can the Council provide direction around an allocation for a STR tax to the desired
areas of impact to help steer a future ballot question? Would the Council like to memorializein the ballot
question or in the whereasclauses any minimum/maximum percentage of collections for a particular use?
POLICY QUESTION #3: What is the desired tax rate to be included in the ballot question?
Polling provided 5 possible scenarios for taxation, ranging from nothing, all the way to 20%. As the tax
rate rose, voter support declined. The consultant summary illustrates the likelihoodof some respondents
supporting a rate other than their indicated preference, grouping majority support at either the 9 or 13
percent rates.
DECISION NEEDED: What tax rate should be incorporated into the final ballot question?
POLICY QUESTION #4: Who pays the tax?
Polling indicated mixed views on if the tax should be for only certain types of vacation rental permits, all
permits, and traditional lodging product. The notable finding includes some tolerance for increasing taxes
on traditional lodging product. It is also evident that uniformity in a new tax – keeping it simple – is
preferred by voters.
DECISION NEEDED: Is there Council consideration about the property tax rate (residential/commercial) in
determining who and how much is included in the tax rate? Should the tax be limited to STRs or be
expanded to include traditional lodges?
POLICY QUESTION #5: What is the desired timeframe for approaching voters with a STR tax
question?
During the April 11 work session discussion, Council members proposed two possible dates for when to
approach voters: November 2022 or March 2023. During the May 11 work session, Council stated a
preference for the November 2022 election, pending the information from polling.
There are currently two state ballot questions – one for a state income tax reduction and second entitled
Natural Medicine Health Act regarding the regulation of phycobilin - that have been certified by the
4
Secretary of State for the November 2022 election. Additionally, Pitkin County has indicated the intent
to place a tax question for the ambulance district and Aspen City Council has indicated a desire for the ½
cent open space and trails sales tax renewal to occur in November 2022. Typically, the more tax questions
there are on a ballot, the less likely it is that all will pass. Based on past ballot contents, the contents of
the November ballot, as of now, do not create an obstacle to the question being fairly considered by the
public.
DECISION NEEDED: Does Council desire to place a question on the November 2022 ballot?
A ballot question will need to be formalized and adopted in two readings by the Council by the end of
August, and then the formal ballot question will need to be conveyed to the County by early September
for certification.
POLICY QUESTION #6: Are there any particular points the Council would like to see included in the
whereas clauses of the resolution for consideration placing the ballot question? Does the Council wish
to change any other portions of the ballot question?
DECISION NEEDED: Whereas clauses are considerations that outline the high-level policy rationale for the
actions of the Council to place a question before the voters. Is there any specific topics desired by the
Council in whereas clauses? Staff anticipate covering the fundamental information about the Aspen Area
Community Plan, land use regulations, and property tax equity. Which other topics, if any, would the
Council like to see?
Further the ballot language itself was tested in the polling questions. Staff is suggesting a slight
modification of the language around uses to list affordable housing first, and the addition of the words
“and repair” after infrastructure maintenance.
“Shall City of Aspen taxes be increased not more than $10.7 million commencing January
1, 2023 and by whatever amounts are generated annually thereafter by the imposition of
an excise tax of not more than 13% on the amounted charged to any person on a nightly
room rate at any commendation or business that is required to obtain a vacation rental
permit from the city;
And shall the revenue generated from such as tax be utilized for the purpose of funding
affordable housing, infrastructure maintenance and repair, and environmental
initiatives, with the rate of the tax being allowed to be increased or decreased without
further voter approval so long as the rate of taxation does not exceed 13%; and shall the
city be authorized to collect, keep, and spend the revenues from such tax and any
investment income therefrom notwithstanding the limits of Article X, Section 20 of the
Colorado Constitution?”
Please note that with this language, it becomes a legislative act of the Council, through the adoption of
the annual budget, to determine the split of the revenue between the different purposes.
5
Finances:
City Council can anticipate a fee around $15,000 for Pitkin County to administer this ballot question. City
staff will update revenue estimates to match the desired final language.
As presented on May 9, staff estimate the each additional 1.0% of taxwill generate $826,000 in revenues.
This estimate is based upon 2021 taxable short term rental sales of $82,600,000.
Recommendations:
1. Staff recommends moving forward with a ballot question for November 8, 2022 for an excise tax
not to exceed 13%, generating up to $10.7 million in new revenues in the first year for affordable
housing, infrastructure repair and maintenance, and environmental initiatives.
2. Staff supports the following draft ballot language, subject to changes based upon the Council
discussion in the work session. The wording changed since polling is in bold.
“Shall City of Aspen taxes be increased not more than $10.7 million commencing
January 1, 2023 and by whatever amounts are generated annually thereafter by
the imposition of an excise tax of not more than 13% on the amounted charged
to any person on a nightly room rate at any commendation or business that is
required to obtain ava cation rental permit form the city;
And shall the revenue generated from such as tax be utilized for the purpose of
funding affordable housing, infrastructure maintenance and repair, and
environmental initiatives, with the rate of the tax being allowed to be increased
or decreased without further voter approval so long as the rate of taxation does
not exceed 13%; and shall the city be authorized to collect, keep, and spend the
re venues from such tax and any investment income therefrom notwithstanding
the limits of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution?”
If Council wishes to move forward, staff will bring back the necessary ordinance for first reading on August
23, 2022 and a special meeting on September 6, 2022 to meet the County Clerk’s filing deadline.
Exhibits
A: Polling Results by Fredrick Polling
B: Short-Term Rental Fee Analysis by ESP
C: Short-Term Rental Outreach Summary and Detail
D: May 9, 2022 Short-Term Rental Tax Packet Materials and Slides
6
POLL RESULTS:
Aspen Voters’ Opinions on
Short-Term Rentals
July 2022
Prepared for:
City of Aspen
7
SURVEY METHODOLOGY & SAMPLE DEMOGRAPHICS
2
Sample Demographics: n=322
Gender
Male 51%
Female 48%
Other 1%
Age
18-39 24%
40-64 51%
65-Up 25%
•Sample Size:n=322 completed interviews
•Eligibility:Voters in the City of Aspen
•Interview Method:n=280 Online through cell-text invite + n=42 live caller phone interviews
•Interview Dates:July 18-24, 2022
•Margin of Error:5.5%
Party Registration
Democrat 47%
Republican 16%
Independent 37%
Length of Residence
0-10 years 18%
11-20 years 27%
21-30 years 23%
30+ years/Native 31%
Home
Own 72%
Rent 28%
Own STR Permit 10%
8
1.Short-Term Rental (STR) Tax Concept .
•Aspen voters’ initial reaction to increasing taxes on short-term rentals is nearly 2:1 positive: 63% YES, 33% NO on a
generic ballot "to enact a new tax charged on short-term renters of Aspen homes that are licensed with a vacation rental
permit."
(Note: this question --sequenced 1st in the poll--does not give a specific tax rate nor detail on use of new revenues.)
•The STR tax is supported by 77% of Democrats but opposed by 63% to 35% among Republicans. Independent voters
support it 56% to 40%.
Also, 74% of renters support it compared to a smaller 59% majority of homeowners.
•Among the 10% of the sample who have a vacation rental permit, the STR tax is opposed by 75% to 25%.
•OPEN-ENDS on why vote YES and NO.
Ø YES voters feel STRs are negatively impacting neighborhoods, the sense of community, and the availability and price of housing in
Aspen. They also feel that short-term renters are not paying the full cost of their impact on Aspen services or their fair share
compared to other commercial business operations.
The vast majority offering a use for new STR money would prefer it go toward more housing for local residents and workers. Also,
some see an STR tax as a way to limit or discourage tourism.
Ø NO voters have strong anti-tax feelings, believe tourism is good / essential for the Aspen economy, don’t trust government to spend
new tax money wisely, or feel that STRs (and their property owners) already contribute a fair and sufficient amount of taxes.
The open ends suggest there is a great deal of emotion and intensity of feeling on both sides of this issue.
FINDINGS
3
9
FINDINGS
4
2. Use of New STR Tax Revenue.
Three options are tested both separately and in a "preferred option" format. Below are the % who "strongly
approve" and (total approve --strongly + somewhat) of new STR revenue used for that purpose when tested
separately.
•63% (81) --Affordable Housing --construction, purchase preservation of workforce housing.
•48% (77) --Environmental Programs --clean water quality, stormwater treatment and healthy streams,
wildfire mitigation or greenhouse gas reduction.
•36% (68) --City Infrastructure --pedestrian safety, bike lanes and affordable restaurant and retail space for
public benefit.
When forced to choose the TOP PRIORITY among these three, AFFORDABLE HOUSING is the clear winner.
•63% affordable housing, 20% infrastructure, 16% environmental programs.
10
FINDINGS
5
3. Level of STR Tax Rate.
Three questions were asked about the possible level of a new short-term rental tax rate.
Option A. Equal to the commercial tax rate (close the $4.4 mil. revenue gap).
•63% Support, 34% Oppose. (equal to the STR "concept" ballot vote).
Option B. Cover part or all of the Affordable Housing Fee (that commercial and large-scale residential properties pay).
•61% support, 37% oppose.
Preferred STR tax rate --5 options given for forced choice of one.
Ø 26% --none / zero.
Ø 17% --5.4% tax... equal to the $4.4 mill commercial tax gap.
Ø 12% --9.6% tax... closes tax gap + 1/3rd affordable housing fee.
Ø 14% --13% tax... closes tax gap + 2/3rd affordable housing fee.
Ø 28% --20% tax... closes tax gap + all affordable housing fee.
Clearly, with a "5-option" choice, there is no voter consensus on how large the STR tax should be, but responses
above show that a majority of voters support some combination tax rate that covers the $4.4 million commercial tax
rate gap and some contribution to the Affordable Housing Fund... 54% pick an option that is 9.6% or one of the two
higher options (meaning those voters would likely accept 9.6%).
11
4.Opinions on Variable STR Tax Rates.
When informed there are 3 kinds of privately owned residential properties permitted for short-term rentals…
•65% want investor-owned rentals taxed at a higher rate vs. 35% preferring all three types should be taxed at the same
rate.
•73% think condos in fully-managed buildings should be taxed at the same rate as other STRs vs. 25% saying they should
be taxed at a lower rate.
5. STRs vs. All Lodging.
When given a three-way choice on the broader issue of tourism and taxes...
•31% would NOT raise taxes on any Aspen lodging (this is a very consistent one-third who oppose any tax increase
throughout the poll).
•42% would raise taxes just on private residential property STRs.
•26% would raise taxes on ALL lodging including hotels and STRs.
6. Variable Rate Tax Increase –Comprehensive Proposal.
53% YES, 43% NO for a variable rate tax increase covering all lodging in Aspen –3% for hotels, 6% for fully-managed condos,
8% for owner-occupied STR’s, and 13% for investor non-resident owned STR’s.
FINDINGS
6
12
FINDINGS
7
7.Big Picture Mood: Tourism and Taxes.
Three questions are asked to get at the underlying mood of Aspen voters that might impact their vote on upcoming ballots.
a) Tourism benefits... a 60-40 split against.
•40% agree "Aspen greatly benefits from the tourist economy and we should not do anything that raises the cost to visit
here or puts this vital economic engine at risk." (59% disagree)
b) Fairness in visitor lodging costs... 44% show sympathy to STR visitors.
•44% agree "Since visitors staying in hotels and those staying in licensed short-term rentals both already pay the exact
same sales tax and lodging tax,it is just not fair to impose another large tax on visitors staying at privately-owned
properties." (55% disagree)
c) Tax STRs as businesses... 69% say this okay to protect Aspen quality of life.
•69% agree "Aspen tourism has to be managed so it doesn't ruin the residents' quality of life and if requiring short term
renters to pay more taxes so these residential rental businesses pay what other Aspen businesses must pay, that is OK."
8.Ballot Language Vote... 55% YES, 42% NO.
See Q 17; the proposed ballot language is presented with details of a maximum 13% STR rate with revenues used to cover all
three possible options.
13
FINDINGS
8
BOTTOM LINE.
A majority of Aspen voters consistently support some form of new STR tax with a hard core of one-third of voters
consistently opposed. That opposition could climb into the mid-40s if this issue becomes a matter of "fairness" given
STR renters already pay the same sales and lodging tax as visitors staying in hotels.
However, if the focus of this propose STR tax becomes more about equity of private property being used for
commercial purposes paying the same rate as other Aspen businesses pay, then support for the STR tax is in the mid-
to-upper 60s, pushing opposition to its core minimum.
Short-term rentals and affordable housing are clearly linked in the minds of STR tax supporters. STRs are seen as
contributing to the lack of rental units for residents, the increasing cost of long-term rentals and the increasing price
of buying a home in Aspen... all undermining the fabric of community as well as impacting quality of neighborhoods
and life in the city.
To the extent this proposed STR tax ballot issue is connected to affordable housing both in the rate charged and the
use of funds generated, the more the majority constituency supporting an STR tax concept are likely to become YES
voters on the November ballot.
Also, it appears the less complex, more straightforward the ballot proposal can be –few to no variable tax rates –
the stronger support for increasing taxes on STR’s becomes.
14
Yes
%
No
%
Party
Democrat 77 18
Republican 35 63
Independent 56 40
Home
Own 59 38
Rent 74 20
Have STR Permit
(10% of sample)
25 75
63
74
SHORT-TERM RENTAL TAX INCREASE: CONCEPT TEST
Vote YES (63%)
Vote NO (33%)
DK (4%)
Would you vote YES or NO to enact a new tax charged on short-
term renters of Aspen homes that are licensed with a vacation
rental permit?
9
15
OPEN-ENDS: Why STR Tax Increase Supporters “Vote YES”
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-term rentals?
10
Aspen has become a renters
and second-home paradise.
Local real estate that can be used for housing locals is
being bought up by people that only live in aspen part
time and are instead renting it out to high net worth
individuals.
Because all my friends
moved away and I
don’t feel welcome in
my own home town.
At least use this to
create housing and
community.
Aspen residents have a difficult
time finding affordable housing,
and short term rentals make it even
harder to live in Aspen anymore.
Any kind of restrictions on short
term rentals is a positive for Aspen.
Because our town is out of control
with growth and expansion, all is
impacting our infrastructure, roads,
water usage, utilities, air pollution,
police staffing, sheriff dept., public
health, etc.
Short-term rentals are
exacerbating the
housing crisis.
People are not local residents and do not work in
the city or surrounding areas. We should be
using the tax money from this to put towards
long-term housing for residents who work in
aspen and need housing desperately. This community will die without
affordable housing and short term
rentals are a major cause of livable
space being taken out of the
system.
Fairness. They should pay
commercial property tax rates.
Good for the city; might encourage longer
term rentals; might convince some owners
to sell to permanent residents.
Houses should be used for people who live here, but in
the case that they are used for short-term rentals, I think
money should go back into our community.
We shouldn't limit the number of
STR's, but tax them all, encouraging
tourism and giving us a larger tax
base.
Help to bring more balance to the
real estate market and most
importantly should be used to help
pay for employee housing.
Good way to create more revenue
off of home owners making a profit
off of their second homes.
Short-term rentals are changing
the fabric of our neighborhoods.
Property owners are going to run
their homes as a business then they
should be contributing to
commercial sales tax revenue.
Short-term rentals are a great
revenue source to pay for the
impacts they impose on the city in
terms of traffic and pressure on
affordable housing options.
Short-term rentals change
residential use in residential zoning
to commercial use in residential
zoning, becoming small hotels, with
more use and wear on community
infrastructure.
Short-term renters don’t appreciate
our local culture, don’t contribute
and overcrowd our town. We need
more long-term rentals for
employees.
Short-term rentals have killed any
available housing for locals. This effect
should be heavily mitigated. STRs are basically small hotels.
There is no reason from a policy
perspective that they should not
have to pay the same taxes that
hotels pay to cover the cost of
services provided by the city while
the visitor is in town.
These are commercial
rentals in residential
neighborhoods negatively
impacting those
neighborhoods.
The real estate market in
Aspen caters solely to
those renting at exorbitant,
short-term prices. There is
absolutely no reasonable
regulation taking place for
short term pricing, which
disrupts long term rentals
as well.
There’s nowhere to
live for regular
people.
The purchasing of multiple ST rental
units by non-residents are driving
up the pricing for locals both in
being able to purchase or we/they
are pricing out long-term rentals.
16
OPEN-ENDS: Why STR Tax Increase Opponents “Vote NO”
Why would you vote NO? Why do you think it is a bad idea?
11
Already paying tax on our home.
Should be able to let others stay
at your home.
It will detract
people from
coming to
Aspen.
Short-term permits are already
supposed to pay the city a tax and I
would not support a new one or an
additional one.
For the economic
reason, more taxes
the rent increases.
STRs should be taxed
at the same rate as
hotels but not more.
City has plenty of sales,
lodging and RETT tax. It
would only make
lodging more
expensive for visitors.
We already pay so many
different taxes and so
many expenses and is not
going to help.
I have zero faith that revenues
raised will be spent productively.
I own a rental property. I already pay
tax on the income. My property
manager pays tax. My rental agent
pays tax on commission. I pay
property tax on my property. Do not
charge more tax on already
expensive cost of Aspen lodging and
doing business here.
I already pay license fees, property tax, City,
County and State Sales Tax every quarter and
income tax annually on what's left; why should
I, who live here, be penalized based on source
of income?
Government
overreach.
Going to make vacationing in
aspen just that much more
expensive for the average person .
It is very expensive to do repairs and
maintenance, pay property managers
and housekeepers ... we already have
an 11.3% Aspen City tax in addition to
other taxes... it is already very
expensive to rent.
Making the most of your property and renting
it out should not require you to pay a tax.
Short-term renters are bringing business to
the economy of Aspen so we are making
money off them from sales tax revenues.
Makes our community more
exclusive and expensive and creates
greater economic disparity.
People can barely afford to live
here as is. Why not let them make
extra income to supplement their
mortgages. We have no one to
work in this town because no one
can afford to live here. Give
people a break.
Reduces economic capacity of town
as a tourist destination, hurts locals
who need to rent primary residence.
Rental costs are too high-people will
just charge more to cover tax increase
and cause more problems with
affordable housing options.
Rental are good for a
resort/tourist community.
Sounds like a great plan for the
wealthy second homeowner but as
a resident if I need help defraying
the high cost of living here and
renting several times helps pay off
my mortgage.
You are discouraging
people with lower incomes
from coming to Aspen.
Will disincentivize people from doing it above
board and reporting to the city. Will create a
black market. Penalizes real estate owners who
may or may not actually be true locals who
depend on short term rental income.
We need
reasonable
priced short
term rentals
in Aspen the
hotels are so
expensive.
The rentals are
already paying
sales and lodging
tax and should
not have to pay
disproportionatel
y more than
other users of
labor and
services in the
city.
The city wastes tax dollars.
This is private enterprise and
brings in more tourist dollars
into the local economy with
a bigger spend. Why
discourage this?
17
73
Yes
%
No
%
Party
Democrat 68 28
Republican 25
Independent 50 46
Home
Own 51 46
Rent 64 32
Have STR Permit
(10% of sample)
17 83
SHORT-TERM RENTAL: BALLOT LANGUAGE VOTE
Vote YES
(55%)Vote NO
(42%)
DK (3%)
Answer if you would vote YES or NO on the following ballot:
“Shall City of Aspen taxes be increased not more than $10.7 million commencing January 1, 2023 and by
whatever amounts are generated annually thereafter by the imposition of an excise tax of not more than
13% on the amount charged to any person on a nightly room rate at any accommodation or business that
is required to obtain a vacation rental permit from the city.
And shall the revenue generated from such tax be utilized for the purpose funding infrastructure
maintenance, environmental initiatives, and affordable housing, with the rate of tax being allowed to be
increased or decreased without further voter approval so long as the rate of taxation does not exceed
13%; and shall the city be authorized to collect, keep, and spend the revenues from such tax and any
investment income therefrom notwithstanding the limits of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado
Constitution?”
12
18
SUPPORT FOR NEW STR MONEY USES
13
Next, depending on the level of tax charged on Aspen short-term rentals, it could generate $10 million a year or more. Answer if you
strongly approve, somewhat approve, or disapprove of this new tax money being spent for each of the following.
Total
Approve-Disapprove
%
81-18
77-22
68-38
63%
48%
36%
18%
29%
32%
Strongly Approve Somewhat Approve
Affordable housing –construction, purchase, preservation of workforce
housing.
Environmental programs such as clean water quality, storm water treatment
and healthy streams, wildfire mitigation, or greenhouse gas reduction.
Maintenance of city infrastructure including “lifestyle enhancements” such as
pedestrian safety, bike lanes, and affordable restaurant and retail space for
public benefit.
19
PREFERRED USE OF NEW STR MONEY
Maintenance of city
infrastructure (20%)Environmental programs
(16%)
Affordable housing
(63%)
DK (1%)
Of these three, which would be your top priority use for money generated from a new short-term rental tax…?
• Maintenance of city infrastructure.
• Environmental programs.
--OR--
• Affordable housing.
14
20
OPINION OF PROPOSALS FOR STR TAX RATE
15
Close Commercial Property Revenue Gap Cover Affordable Housing Fund Gap
Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE setting the short-term rental tax rate to close
the $4.4 million tax revenue gap between what hotels and lodges pay at the
commercial property tax rate and what the 1,200 permitted short-term rental
properties pay at the residential property tax rate?
Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE setting the short-term rental tax rate to
cover the fee –in whole or in part –of what every new commercial or
large-scale residential property MUST pay into the city’s affordable
housing fund to provide housing to the service workers who provide
services to the guests renting these 1,200 permitted properties?
63%
34%
Support Oppose
61%
37%
Support Oppose
21
DIFFERENTIAL TAX RATE BASED ON UNIT TYPE
All taxes at same
rate (35%)
Investors taxed at
higher rates (63%)
DK (2%)
Here is another factor with short-term, rentals. There are three kinds of privately-owned residential properties that are permitted for short-term rentals in Aspen:
Ø Homes the owners live in for all or part of the year;
Ø Homes owned by investors who are absentee owners; and
Ø Condos in a fully-managed lodge building.
Do you think…?
• All three types should be taxed at the same rate for short-term rentals.
--OR--
• Those rented out by investors should be taxed at a higher rate.
16
22
FULLY-MANAGED CONDOS: DIFFERENTIAL TAX RATE?
At lower rate (25%)
At the same rate
(73%)
DK (2%)
Following up, do you think short-term rentals in condos in fully managed buildings that have full -time staff on duty just like a hotel
should be taxed…?
• At a lower rate than other types of properties.
--OR--
• At the same rate as the others.
17
23
WHO TAX –STR ONLY OR HOTELS AND STR
18
Having heard this information about taxing short-term rentals and tourism, which option do you prefer…?
• Do not raise taxes on any Aspen lodging.
• Raise taxes just on short-term rentals of private property.
--OR--
• Raise taxes on all lodging including hotels and short-term rentals.
No tax increase on
any lodging (31%)
Just STR private
property (42%)
All lodging: hotels
and STR (26%)
DK (1%)
24
PREFERRED STR RATE: 5-WAY CHOICE
None (26%)
5.4% tax (17%)
9.6% tax (12%)
13% tax (14%)
20% tax (28%)
Knowing that a 5.4% per night tax rate on short-term rentals covers the $4.4 million property tax revenue gap and 20% per night covers 100% of the
affordable housing fund fee plus the “tax revenue gap,” which of these five options do you support?
a. None –zero percent.
b. 5.4% --equal to the $4.4 million property tax revenue gap between commercial and residential rentals.
c. 9.6% --closes the tax gap and mitigates one-third of the affordable housing cost.
d. 13% --closes the tax gap and mitigates two-thirds of the affordable housing cost.
--OR--
e. 20% --closes the tax gap and 100% of the affordable housing cost.
19
25
PRO-TOURISM SENTIMENT TESTS
20
Tourism Benefits Economy Not Fair to Tax STR’s More
Aspen greatly benefits from the tourist economy and we
should not do anything that raises the cost to visit here
or puts this vital economic engine at risk.
Since visitors staying in hotels and those staying in
licensed short-term rentals both already pay the exact
same sales tax and lodging tax, it is just not fair to
impose another large tax on visitors staying at
privately-owned properties.
40%
59%
Agree Disagree
44%
55%
Agree Disagree
26
69%80%
48%
64%72%67%66%69%69%76%67%65%
30%19%
50%
35%28%30%33%30%29%23%32%32%
Dem Rep Ind 0-10 11-30 30+/Native Men Women 18-39 40-64 65+
AGREE DISAGREE
Total
(n=322)-Party-
BOTTOM LINE STR CONCEPT: OKAY TO TAX SHORT TERM RENTERS AS TOURISTS
-Length of Residence--Gender-
65%
80%
25%
95%
20%
97%
32%
13%
97%92%
35%
17%
75%
4%
79%
2%
66%
85%
2%8%
Own Rent STR Permit
Holder
Yes No Yes No None STR Only All lodging
-STR: Initial Concept-
-Age-
21
“Aspen tourism has to be managed so it doesn’t ruin the residents’ quality of life and if requiring short -term renters to pay more taxes so these residential rental
businesses pay what other Aspen businesses must pay, that is okay.”
-Home--STR: Ballot Language--Preferred Tax Increase-
27
66
Yes
%
No
%
Party
Democrat 66 30
Republican 31 67
Independent 48 50
Home
Own 49 48
Rent 31
Have STR Permit
(10% of sample)
25 75
COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL: TAX ALL LODGING AT VARIABLE RATE
Vote YES (53%)
Vote NO (43%)
DK (3%)
Lastly, below is one last comprehensive proposed tax increase on ALL types of
lodging permitted in Aspen, but with variable rates. Would you vote YES or
NO for this proposal…?
•Impose a new 3% tax on hotel stays;
•Impose a new 6% tax on stays at fully managed condos;
•Impose a new 8% tax on stays at owner-occupied units; and
•Impose a new 13% tax on stays at units owned by non-resident investors.
22
28
SUMMARY OF SHORT-TERM RENTAL “BALLOT VOTE” TESTS
23
Initial “Concept”
(No tax rate or $ use
given)
%
Ballot Language
(13% max + $$ used for 3
purposes)
%
Comprehensive
Variable Tax
(3%, 6%, 8%, 13%)
%
YES 63 55 53
NO 33 42 43
Don’t Know 4 3 3
29
24
30
Why would you vote NO? Why do you think it is a bad idea?
1
A portion of short term renters in the county are working residents who can't find housing, and are
using these rentals until they have a more permanent place to stay in the Valley as longer term leases
are getting harder and harder to find.
Already paying tax on our home. Should be able to let others stay at your home.
Bad tax
Because it’s going to take that need it
Because Aspen City Council is mismanaging the mitigation of Employee Housing for developers such as
Mark Hunt and the Gorsuch project, so will put the burden on those of us who live and vote here and
have “invested” in Aspen. And then give $4.5M
Because it will detract people from coming to aspen
Because the City of Aspen hasn’t shown how this money would be used…. And has shown in the last
years that money spending is not a concern. The city hasn’t listened to both sides of this issue and has
acted from their point of view always.
Because the city of aspen is just making things harder for anyone not owning employee housing to be
able to remodel or build. Always screwing the people that live in free market housing.
Because we already pay so many different taxes and so many expenses and is not going to help.
Because we are taxed to the max
Because you would just spend the money on studies and consultants
Because you’re going to end up taxing the demographic that isn’t super wealthy and that rents to
moderate income partial residents or tourists.
City has plenty of sales, lodging and RETT tax. It would only make lodging more expensive for visitors.
City has too much money. City can build that monster of a city hall but us long time locals, 5th
generation Coloradans are being regulated to death while Mark -money laundering Hunt is tearing to
town core apart.
Encourage use of space
Enough taxes already
Enough taxes already.
Everything the city is doing makes no sense, all the taxes over regulation is not solving anything you’re
creating a bigger issue. And you have a City Council that has no qualifications or experience and voting
on things that is not helping the city.
31
Why would you vote NO? Why do you think it is a bad idea?
2
For the economic reason, more taxes the rent increases. I look the situation and I am an employee, I
don’t make too much money.
Free markets are best AND we need to enforce the worker housing rules
Government overreach.
Have no idea how the tax money will be used
I am not a piggy bank; I already pay license fees, property tax, City, County and State Sales Tax every
quarter and income tax annually on what's left; why should I, who live here, be penalized based on
source of income?
I am NOT adverse to a modest tax, say, a couple of points. However, the 13% level suggested in the
press is absurd, especially when there's no mutually agreed use by our community for the likely massive
amount of proceeds such a tax rate would g
I am SICK of TAXES.
I don’t think there should be a new tax. Short term permits are already supposed to pay the city a tax
and I would not support a new one or an additional one.
I have zero faith that revenues raised will be spent productively
I need to be educated with more information. the direction that's going to be taken once the tax is
approved.
I own a rental property. I already pay tax on the income. My property manager pays tax. My rental
agent pays tax on commission. I pay property tax on my property. Do not charge more tax on already
expensive cost of Aspen lodging and doing business here!
i think people should be allowed to use short term rentals when they have the capacity to do so.
I think short-term rentals make the city better, they bring life into the city
I think STRs should be taxed at the same rate as hotels but not more.
I work in the hospitality industry and want more people in town than less, it’s my livelihood
It is already taxed
It is their own home which costs SO much to own in Aspen, if they want to rent it out why would the city
get involved? The city will make money on the monies spent by the renters
It is very expensive to do repairs and maintenance, pay property managers and housekeepers … we
already have an 11.3% Aspen City tax in addition to other taxes… it is already very expensive to rent.
Would make me less likely to rent short term.
32
Why would you vote NO? Why do you think it is a bad idea?
3
It’s a terrible idea, biased and unfair.
It’s going to make vacationing in aspen just that much more expensive for the average person .
It’s not as if Aspen’s tax coffers are not full enough, adding additional costs to the Aspen experience that
only benefits our local government is a travesty
It’s too high
It’s a vacation town!
Just makes our community more exclusive and expensive and creates greater economic disparity.
Less government
Locals who are benefiting from the income of STRs already pay a lot in taxes and need the extra income
to pay the skyrocketing rental prices being charged.
Lodging tax is already 11.3%. We now want to make visitors pay even more?
Making the most of your property and renting it out should not require you to pay a tax. Short-term
renters are bringing business to the economy of Aspen so we are making money off them from sales tax
revenues.
More taxes do not solve the problem. Limit short term rentals. That solves the problem. Let’s not turn
our town into a giant hotel. More taxes are not going to solve the overcrowding problem. More taxes
are just more government waste not solving the problem.
Need more research— not enough time & education before November
No more taxes
No more taxes!
No more taxing for the city’s coffers
No taxation without representation. Stomping individual property owner rights.
Not fair. To many variations
People can barely afford to live here as is. Why not let them make extra income to supplement their
mortgages. We have no one to work in this town because no one can afford to live here. Give people a
break!
Promotes black market. STR already pay taxes and license fees.
33
Why would you vote NO? Why do you think it is a bad idea?
4
Reduces economic capacity of town as a tourist destination, hurts locals who need to rent primary
residence. I could support something that charged for peak season rentals of any type with exception for
primary residence.
Rent control has never worked in history and it won’t work now even under a tricky new name
Rental are good for a resort/tourist community
Rental costs are too high- people will just charge more to cover tax increase and cause more problems
with affordable housing options
Short term rentals are very useful attribute to the community, and should not be discouraged, or taxed
beyond current rate …. Instead, consider adding a 13% tax per bed to all hotels, the funds from that
going to mitigate employee housing needs
Short term rentals are not the problem or the issue at hand. City has plenty of revenue and penalizing
owners is a bad idea. Not everyone renting is a wealthy second home owner.
Should not tax on income I will already be taxed on. If I chose to rent
Sounds like a great plan for the wealthy second homeowner but as a resident if I need help defraying the
high cost of living here and know rent several times helps pay off my mortgage this becomes punitive
with unintended consequences.
Stop taxing everything. This government abuse has got to stop.
Tax doesn’t solve problem
Tax happy community enough is enough
Tax rate is so high we are not competitive with other destination markets and are often asked to lower
our rates so the total cost is lower to the guest.
Taxed enough
Taxes already too high
Taxes are already too high
Taxes wouldn’t solve the problem. Need to change zoning to restrict str in neighborhoods
TERRIBLE IDEA, numerous reasons. Will disincentivize people from doing it above board and reporting to
the city. Will create a black market. Penalizes real estate owners who may or may not actually be true
locals who depend on short term rental income.
The City cannot be trusted with more tax payer funds. They seem to waste the funds they are already
working with, presently.
34
Why would you vote NO? Why do you think it is a bad idea?
5
The city does not need a new source of revenue. Many of the STR's will be by individuals. There is no
need to make the process more cumbersome for them and add to costs.
The City wastes tax dollars
The government does a bad job, why would I allow them to have more money from this tax?
The government mishandles tax money so poorly. Stop hiring companies to assess low income housing
and just build it. If you tax short term regardless then have a lower tax for units built on the mountain
that have been dedicated str from the start.
The homeowner is already paying taxes for the services in the City of Aspen. What additional services
would the renter be receiving for this tax? None. The homeowner is going to pay taxes to the state for
income earned on their rentals.
The question is unclear. Would the tax be on the homeowner that is renting out the property or the
rentee (renter) paying to stay in said home?
The rentals are already paying sales and lodging tax and should not have to pay disproportionately more
than other users of labor and services in the City.
There are already rental taxes for short term and an additional property tax on contents of short term
rental homes. Enough.
There is already a lodging tax in place that the con minimum hotels collect. And a tax is not going to
encourage owners to rent to locals… put in place rules around ADU and employers providing some
employee housing.
There is no need for additional general city revenue and there are no plans for this tax to be used to
offset any negative externalities from short-term rentals, e.g., a hotline to enforce noise complaints.
There wasn’t an I’m not sure or don’t know option - but it would depend on the amount of the tax.
There is some concern that additional taxes will just make it harder and more expensive for people who
want to visit and more exclusive.
They have a permit already
They’ll be charged for their permission and their income and I hear it’s going to be a huge tax and some
people need to rent their condos/homes.
This city council has already made a very significant impact on limiting short term rentals. There are
1001 unexpected consequences this city council does not have the foresight or experience to anticipate.
Aspen is also a destination, find balance
this is going to make the cost of everything go up... hotels are already expensive enough !
This is private enterprise and brings in more tourist dollars into the local economy with a bigger spend.
Why discourage this?
35
Why would you vote NO? Why do you think it is a bad idea?
6
Too hard to keep track of and some locals need the extra income from these rentals.... If it goes to ballot
I would definitely vote NO
Too high
Too many taxes already in this town
Too many taxes? What will the tax supplement?
Way too much government interference on taxation, it won’t solve the problem
We already have lodging tax in the double digits, plus a fee for the business license. You’re trampling on
private property rights by limiting rental permits. And for what? More lawsuits??
we are already tax too much
We have enough taxes. Property taxes are up and up. It has become so expensive for locals. If you truly
want to help locals stop enacting more taxes. Aspen should be helping the locals.
We need more employee housing
We need reasonable priced short term rentals in Aspen the hotels are so expensive!
What are you trying to do make it so expensive only the billionaires and their friends can come here?
STOP not everyone is a Walmart! Normal people are going to be priced out of here in the summer and
the winter!
What is the proposed rate? It should be in line with existing hotel tax.
When you tax something you get less of it. I don’t think it is a good idea to discourage tourists or to
harm the owners and operators of short-term rentals. Also, the city already has too damn much money.
They should tighten their belt and waste less.
Why do you think another tax is a good idea ?
Why should there be additional tax to homeowners / residents in Aspen? Tenants already pay 11.3% tax.
You are discouraging people with lower incomes from coming to Aspen.
36
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
A tax on short term rentals is a good start but we just need to ban short term rentals in general. Short
term rentals are just causing more and more issues with the local housing market. A tax will just be
passed along rather than act as a deterrent.
Absolutely!
Aspen residents have a difficult time finding affordable housing, and short term rentals make it even
harder to live in Aspen anymore. Any kind of restrictions on short term rentals is a positive for Aspen.
Aspen revenue needs.
Aspen should tax/fee owners making income on short term property rentals. Other income producing
businesses must pay taxes/fees doing any business in City/County
Because I think people don’t pay enough taxes, I don’t want to threat with traffic, they eat our food and
use our facilities
Because all my friends moved away and I don’t feel welcome in my own home town. At least use this to
create housing and community.
Because I own three businesses in town and I have to pay for all of them and it is a business for them
Because I think this is an area overlooked.
Because I would like to city benefit from individuals using their homes to generate more.
Because I’m against having 70% of the town as STR’s
Because is not for taxes, it’s because we have a long volume of tourists.
Because it has become a renters and 2nd home paradise
Because it puts a fair price on a very on-demand commodity and it needs to be regulated.
Because it raises cost of local employees
Because it seems to me there’s a lot of money being made on short term rentals in Aspen and because
of that reason I believe they should be responsible for paying taxes on the income they make
Because it will bring in revenue and these homeowner owe it to aspen
Because local real estate that can be used for housing locals is being bought up by people that only live
in aspen part time and are instead renting it out to high net worth individuals.
Because our town is out of control with growth and expansion, all is impacting our infrastructure, roads,
water usage, utilities, air pollution, police staffing, sheriff dept., public health, etc.
37
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
Because overnight guests should pay the same taxes as people who are in hotel rooms. The owners are
just going to pass it on to the tenant and the city of Aspen has a right to collect that money
Because short term rentals are exacerbating the housing crisis
Because short term renters can afford it.
Because the influx of renters impacts local services negatively in addition to the basic property tax that
would be collected from that property.
Because there’s next to nowhere for hardworking locals to fucking live.
Because these people are not local residents and do not work in the city or surrounding areas. We
should be using the tax money from this to put towards long-term housing for residents who work in
aspen and need housing desperately.
Because they are ruining our town and to pay for employee housing we are losing because of rentals
Because they may help on finding long term rentals for other people.
Because they take away inventory from workers and create more traffic which impacts locals quality of
life.
Because this community will die without affordable housing and short term rentals are a major cause of
livable space being taken out of the system
Because vacation rentals should be penalized in favor of people who will ACTUALLY LIVE HERE. We have
a housing crisis. Let the people who work here live here
Because we have a housing crisis and we are not supporting our long term rentals.
Because we have a lot of short term rentals that don’t always benefit locals but the taxes will be used to
benefit both locals and visitors
Because we need more housing for full time residents versus rental income for ST housing
Bringing it up to the level of the hotels seems fair. As long as it is applied equally to all and is used for
the right things, not the change in parallel parleying, I think it COULD be a good thing.
Businesses should pay tax on their income
But not at such a high rate
Could deter people from renting their property if not making enough extra income
Create more revenue for the city and favor the construction of more employee housing
38
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
Depends on the wording.
Everybody is renting out, needs to be controlled
Everyone should pay their fair share of taxes. Especially when they will be making money off of the
property.
Fairness. They should pay commercial property tax rates.
Finance affordable housing
For employee housing
For the private homes in residential areas, they should be subjected to a higher tax, as they have not
incurred lodging taxes in the past. Condo minimum hotels should NOT be included in this, as they have
always paid lodging taxes.
Fuck ‘em, make more money and hope that some of the landlords go back to long term rentals.
Good for the city; might encourage longer term rentals; might convince some owners to sell to
permanent residents
Help support the infrastructure
Hopefully the money could be used to fund programs to boost the vitality of the local community. The
town feels like it is dying.
Housing crisis, support affordable housing
Housing cross for locals
I believe all rentals, whether it’s a hotel, condo association, realtor or str, should pay a fair and equal
tax.
I don’t think the tax would really stifle business generation for rentals and the revenue should then be
used to offset the affordable housing that they absorb
I feel that private residences should have a higher tax, however condominium hotel properties should
not.
I hope a high short term rental tax will incentivize owners of rental properties to instead rent their units
long term to local employees. The more inventory of long term rentals, the better.
i might vote yes OR no, it depends on the amt of the tax and what it is used for
39
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
I notice that with these rental unit owners, and renters there is somewhat of neglectful behavior
towards neighbors, and Aspen's infrastructure. Many are there to consume as much as they can without
giving or considering the repercussions. $ greed $
I own a hotel! Need I say more? Short term rentals are threatening my business
I think they need to pay their fair share
I think houses should be used for people who live here, but in the case that they are used for short-term
rentals, I think money should go back into our community.
i think it's a great idea, because I am a working class here on aspen and have lived here longer and have
been pushed out, of workers cannot afford housing
I think the taxes on short term rentals should be roughly equivalent to lodging taxes. I am not sure if
they are.
I think they need to be regulated so that we can have a better handle of the local communities housing
needs
I think we shouldn't limit the number of STR's, but tax them all, encouraging tourism and giving us a
larger tax base.
i would say yes mostly the taxes don’t affect me but I am also someone who is on the rental market so
having more rentals available would be more beneficial to me.
I would vote yes
I'm happy to have less tourism in town, I believe this is a way to deter a portion of it
I’m not liking how short term rentals are changing the fabric of our neighborhoods
If private homeowners are profiting from investment properties, while at the same time taking long
term rentals off the market and making local worker housing harder and less affordable, they should be
contributing to the tax base
If property owners are going to run their homes as a business then they should be contributing to
commercial sales tax revenue
If the money was used for employee housing I’d vote yes
I’m totally fine with a tax on STR, but really this is just punishing the renter, as the cost will be handed
down to them in the end. Aspen is already unaffordable to visit for most. IMHO the right solution is to
punish owners of multiple STRs
Income
40
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
Income for city that does not affect locals
Individuals who are mostly wall-to-wall neighbors not renting out free standing property putting unusual
and unfair burdens to their neighbor resident property owners who did not buy their own units to live
next to constant revolving door of stranger
Inflated rent for residents. Residential areas are inundated with tourists, sense of community is lost.
It makes sense since the owners are making a bundle so they need to pay ip
It may be good for the city to get more money for affordable housing
It might deter tourists from coming
It should be a regulated activity. And therefore taxed accordingly to be fair and equitable with the
lodging community and associated taxes
It will help to bring more balance to the real estate market and most importantly should be used to help
pay for employee housing
It’s a good way to create more revenue off of home owners making a profit off of their second homes.
It’s a vacation tourist town, if it’s short term rental, it could help the city and maybe put it toward long
term local resident and affordable employee housing
It’s my inclination but really need more info. How much? How will funds be directed? What STRs are
licensed and subject, and what STRs are private and not subject?
It’s only fair
Keep it at 1/2% and you'll get support
Local goods & services should be taxed to generate funding for upkeep & vitality of community.
Long term resident with a young family. We are trying to leave because we cannot afford rent anymore,
STR licenses should be for owners of primary residence only, like everywhere else. We failed to make
that change, and this is better than nothing.
Match commercial lodging tax. Level the playing field, return tax to community not grow government.
Maybe you can use the tax money to build more employee housing since that is what Aspen really
needs.
Money, reduced crowds. Disincentives.
More revenue for affordable housing
41
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
Multiple short term rentals should be monitored more closely and capped at no more than 2 a year in
residential areas (Cemetery Lane). I have experienced rude, aggressive, entitled rentals, who feel no
obligation to respect neighbors.
Needs more regulation
No housing for workers...(no rentals available anymore) it’s all rich people getting richer...i am not for
owner employee housing ... it’s too abused ... make all housing EMPLOYEE RENTAL UNITS...then there
will be turn over...
People are making income, should b taxed
Raise funds for affordable housing
Regulation and enforcement funding
Rental income is still income.
Rich people should pay taxes
Ridiculous market and rates at the expense of seasonal housing.
S-T renters have many impacts on the community and our quality of life. We need to fix traffic into and
out of town, etc.
Seems to make sense
Share the windfall
Short term rentals are a great revenue source to pay for the pacts they impose on the city in terms of
traffic and pressure on affordable housing options.
Short term rentals are an inconvenience to everyone and everything. Town is constantly filled with
“newbies” who do not understand or appreciate what Aspen is truly about, well at least what the locals
are about, without whom town could not survive.
Short term rentals are horrible for our community. If they must exist, they must be taxed.
Short term rentals change residential use in residential zoning to commercial use in residential zoning,
becoming small hotels, with more use and wear on community Infrastructure.
Short term rentals don’t face lodging taxes (is that right?) so we need to enact a tax to even the playing
field and to pay for the services their tenants use.
Short term rentals exacerbate the pressure and impact of the current housing crisis. By increasing the
taxes, hopefully the generated income could go towards offsetting this burden. Also, a tax increase
would not inhibit the typical affluent tourist.
42
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
Short term rentals have a lot of wear and tear on the town. Seems appropriate to have them contribute.
Short term rentals have killed any available housing for locals. This effect should be heavily mitigated.
Short term rentals should always be taxed Only issue is what to do with the revenue Perhaps use it to
pay for cardboard pickup at the recycling center
Short term renters don’t appreciate our local culture, don’t contribute and overcrowd our town. We
need more long term rentals for employees
Short-term rental impacts on local infrastructure and government services are the reason we need to
increase taxes on short term rentals - plus we need to take care of the local workforce, who service
short-term rentals (and their housing needs).
Short-term rentals bring more people into town. The additional visitors use the town's resources so it
makes sense to charge additional taxes. On the flip side, locals of the town of Aspen should get tax
breaks on housing.
Short-term rentals create a lot of community impacts. They need to be treated like the commercial
lodging that they function as.
Short-term rentals need to be limited. Taxing will help do that.
Short-term rentals now seem to make up the largest bulk of tourist stays in Aspen. As such, they should
be taxed the same as lodges.
Skyrocketing housing costs are driving out locals who live and work in Aspen. On top of that, we’re
losing the tight knit fabric of our community when many folks are just visiting or coming in and out.
Taxing short-term rentals would hopefully help
Snowmass taxes on rentals are currently higher than Aspen
STR corrupts neighborhoods- are a de facto commercialization of neighborhoods & a back door increase
in our bed base putting more pressure on the availability of affordable housing year round residents ,
Str rob our community of local housing. I wish we could severely limit str.
STR’s are not paying enough tax to offset their impact on this community. City of Aspen did not plan for
the surge in STR’s in the last 10 years. Now working people-tourists and residents .
STRs are a blight on our community and we should limit the licenses available and tax them to the
maximum to encourage long term leases and/or provide a benefit for renting to locals
STRs are basically small hotels. There is no reason from a policy perspective that they should not have to
pay the same taxes that hotels pay to cover the cost of services provided by the city while the visitor is
in town.
43
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
STRs are destroying our town, they need to be taxed on an equal scale to hotels at a minimum. Our
neighborhoods were not zoned to have a thousand mini hotels in them.
STRs benefit from lower employee mitigation costs and lower property taxes than other traditional
forms of lodging and yet they provide lower community benefits from such lodging. STRs have a
negative impact on the character of residential zones.
STRs have ruined my neighborhood.
STRs have turned Aspen into a free-for-all. They should pay for the myriad problems they create.
Summit County has a much more robust policy for short term rentals
Supply and demand. People will pay. $$ raised to go towards detox and mental health in our
community.
Support infrastructure to accommodate more visitors, lack of housing, trail use
Take money from people that don’t live here
Tax the rich. Bernie Sanders.
Taxes pay for the use that will occur
Taxes will add to the city revenue.
That well understand short rental, shortage rental allowed to be rented resident.
The customers are non-residents who can pay some tax to enjoy their Aspen time.
The housing market is crazy and we need some control-the races can go back to help the Aspen
infrastructure
The impact on the private rental market of short-term vacation rentals has been disastrous and should
be mitigated for.
The impacts are paid for by the citizens
The owners make a killing.
The people that own short rental properties make plenty of money and have plenty of money and they
can pay more for taxes.
The people who are making a lot of money on the City Of Aspen and it’s infrastructure should pay their
share of taxes.
44
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
The purchasing of multiple ST rental units by non-residents are driving up the pricing for locals both in
being able to purchase or we/they are pricing out long term rentals.
The real estate market in Aspen caters solely to those renting at exorbitant, short term prices. There is
absolutely no reasonable regulation taking place for short term pricing, which disrupts long term rentals
as well
The short term rental market extracts from and “taxes” our community, the increased taxes will help
give back to our community
The strain put on local services, the loss of housing options and the leveling of the playing field with
traditional hospitality options such as lodges and hotels.
The tax should only be used to build more low income housing.
The taxes can be used for affordable housing IN ASPEN. Since there is none available for locals. Short
term rentals disrupt the community. I used to know my neighbors. Now I don’t because new ones move
in every few weeks and don’t care about anyone.
There is a shortage of affordable rental places in Aspen for full time employees . This might encourage
homeowners to rent full time.
There is not enough housing for the local workforce
There’s no denying the negative impact of short term rentals on the housing crisis. Using revenue
generated from increasing taxes to assist long term residents with their housing needs is a bona fide
good plan.
There’s nowhere to live for regular people
There’s not enough housing for workers Maybe it’ll make them think twice about how they rent out
their place / extra trim, etc.
These are commercial rentals in residential neighborhoods negatively impacting those neighborhoods.
These multi homeowners contribute little to nothing to the local economy. They benefit from the real
estate appreciation and rental income. They do not live here to spend that money locally. They are
adding fuel to the housing crisis.
These STR’s are directly competing with hotels, Ruin some neighborhoods,
They are charging a lot per night and making more $$$ so why should they be exempt from paying
taxes?
They are lodging businesses and should pay a much higher tax than they do now
They are running a business
45
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
They just cause trouble. nothing
They need to contribute
They’ll break up neighborhoods, if not taxed adequately.
They’re able to make money on this service so the city should be able to increase taxes
This has become a new source of income for many & the community should realize some benefits.
Should be put toward affordable housing
This question makes little sense, how can I answer without knowing the rate? I would vote for a
reasonable tax, one that brought the tax rate in line with hotels for example, but not an unreasonably
high tax.
Those landlords should be fairly well-off to start, and can afford it. If they're getting into the lodging
business, it's only fair for them to pay if they're competing with hotels. The hotels shouldn't shoulder all
the burden.
Time to start collecting from all these people that are making tons of money doing these rentals. Make
the tax significant!
To deter this behavior
To encourage the idea that the towns well-being comes first ahead of peoples personal business
opportunities.
To fund more employee housing units for the town to continue to attract vital employees
To help pay for affordable employee housing.
To help with employee housing for those in need of long term rentals.
To make it a question whether short term is worth it or long term is simpler.
To offset impacts to the community.
To pay for additional services that the City of Aspen needs to take on to mitigate the impacts caused by
short term rentals
To subsidize employee housing
To use tax revenue to help offset additional challenges with renters, including adding some portion to
local housing initiatives.
Too many short term rentals contribute to the lack of community in Aspen 2nd home owners should
also be taxed to help pay for more affordable housing
46
Why would you vote YES? Why do you think this is a good idea to increase taxes on short-
term rentals?
Town to busy, don't need short term rentals
Use greed to swallow greed
Use the $ for employee housing, childcare and to offer subsidies for restaurants that locals can eat at
We don’t have enough year round housing for locals. We don’t need more tourism until we figure out
the local housing situation.
We have to limit them somehow and we need more money to address the impacts they cause
We have too many people in Aspen now. Never seen it so crowded.
We live in a community with an ever increasing housing crisis and extremely over-inflated home values,
driven by 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th homeowners. Many of those owners only seek to purchase a property
for its “income potential.”
We need to tax these rentals so we can improve services of the city
Wear and tear on our infrastructure. Should be taxed at the same rate as a hotel
What would the tax be used for?
Why not! help with the streets trails etc.
Without details of the tax increase it is impossible to say how I would vote. I just chose one. Bad
question
Yes! Lived here for 48 years…Aspen has become a place that locals are starting to avoid. The town has
been taken over by people who don’t respect the reason it has become so popular. Really terrible. I’m
losing faith in our beloved community!
You have to increase this tax by a LOT. Enough to offset their value of investment in buying real estate
in this town. Maybe there needs to be a residency clause for newly purchased houses - i.e. you have to
live in a newly bought house for 6 months
47
Toplines July 2022
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals Job 3189
Actual sample: 322 1
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
A. Registered to Vote/Party Registration.
Democrat 151 47%
Republican 52 16%
Independent 119 37%
1. Would you vote YES or NO to enact a new tax charged on short-term renters of
Aspen homes that are licensed with a vacation rental permit?
Vote Yes 202 63%
Vote No 106 33%
DK/Refused 14 4%
Next, depending on the level of tax charged on Aspen short-term rentals, it could
generate $10 million a year or more. Answer if you strongly approve, somewhat approve,
or disapprove of this new tax money being spent for each of the following. Here is the
first one.
4. Maintenance of city infrastructure including “lifestyle enhancements” such as
pedestrian safety, bike lanes, and affordable restaurant and retail space for public
benefit.
Strongly approve 115 36%
Somewhat approve 104 32%
Disapprove 101 31%
DK/Refused 2 1%
Total Approve 219 68%
5. Environmental programs such as clean water quality, storm water treatment and
healthy streams, wildfire mitigation, or greenhouse gas reduction.
Strongly approve 154 48%
Somewhat approve 94 29%
Disapprove 71 22%
DK/Refused 3 1%
Total Approve 248 77%
48
Toplines July 2022
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals Job 3189
Actual sample: 322 2
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
6. Affordable housing - construction, purchase, preservation of workforce housing.
Strongly approve 203 63%
Somewhat approve 59 18%
Disapprove 59 18%
DK/Refused 1 0%
Total Approve 262 81%
7. Of these three, which would be your top priority use for money generated from a
new short-term rental tax?
Maintenance of city infrastructure. 66 20%
Environmental programs. 52 16%
Affordable housing. 202 63%
DK/Refused 2 1%
Next, a couple of questions about your opinion on how much the tax rate for new short-
term rentals should be.
8. Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE setting the short-term rental tax rate to close the
$4.4 million tax revenue gap between what hotels and lodges pay at the commercial
property tax rate and what the 1,200 permitted short-term rental properties pay at
the residential property tax rate?
Support 204 63%
Oppose 108 34%
DK/Refused 10 3%
9. Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE setting the short-term rental tax rate to cover the fee
- in whole or in part - of what every new commercial or large-scale residential
property MUST pay into the city’s affordable housing fund to provide housing to
the service workers who provide services to the guests renting these 1,200 permitted
properties?
Support 196 61%
Oppose 120 37%
DK/Refused 7 2%
49
Toplines July 2022
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals Job 3189
Actual sample: 322 3
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
10. Knowing that a 5.4% per night tax rate on short-term rentals covers the $4.4 million
property tax revenue gap and 20% per night covers 100% of the affordable housing
fund fee plus the “tax revenue gap,” which of these five options do you support?
a. None - zero percent. 85 26%
b. 5.4% - equal to the $4.4 million
property tax revenue gap between
commercial and residential rentals. 55 17%
c. 9.6% - closes the tax gap and
mitigates one-third of the affordable
housing cost. 40 12%
d. 13% - closes the tax gap and
mitigates two-thirds of the affordable
housing cost. 46 14%
e. 20% - closes the tax gap and 100% of
the affordable housing cost. 90 28%
DK/Refused 6 2%
11. Here is another factor with short-term rentals. There are three kinds of privately-
owned residential properties that are permitted for short-term rentals in Aspen:
-- Homes the owners live in for all or part of the year;
-- Homes owned by investors who are absentee owners; and
-- Condos in a fully-managed lodge building.
Do you think?
All three types should be taxed at the
same rate for short-term rentals. 113 35%
Those rented out by investors should be
taxed at a higher rate. 204 63%
DK/Refused 5 2%
50
Toplines July 2022
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals Job 3189
Actual sample: 322 4
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
12. Following up, do you think short-term rentals in condos in fully managed buildings
that have full-time staff on duty just like a hotel should be taxed?
At a lower rate than other types of properties. 81 25%
At the same rate as the others. 235 73%
DK/Refused 6 2%
Next, do you AGREE or DISAGREE with these statements. Here is the first one.
13. Aspen greatly benefits from the tourist economy and we should not do anything that
raises the cost to visit here or puts this vital economic engine at risk.
Agree 127 40%
Disagree 190 59%
DK/Refused 5 1%
14. Since visitors staying in hotels and those staying in licensed short-term rentals both
already pay the exact same sales tax and lodging tax, it is just not fair to impose
another large tax on visitors staying at privately-owned properties.
Agree 143 44%
Disagree 176 55%
DK/Refused 4 1%
15. Aspen tourism has to be managed so it doesn’t ruin the residents’ quality of life and
if requiring short-term renters to pay more taxes so these residential rental
businesses pay what other Aspen businesses must pay, that is okay.
Agree 222 69%
Disagree 96 30%
DK/Refused 4 1%
51
Toplines July 2022
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals Job 3189
Actual sample: 322 5
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
16. Having heard this information about taxing short-term rentals and tourism, which
option do you prefer?
Do not raise taxes on any Aspen lodging. 100 31%
Raise taxes just on short-term rentals
of private property. 136 42%
Raise taxes on all lodging including
hotels and short-term rentals. 82 26%
DK/Refused 4 1%
17. Answer if you would vote YES or NO on the following ballot:
“Shall City of Aspen taxes be increased not more than $10.7 million commencing
January 1, 2023 and by whatever amounts are generated annually thereafter by the
imposition of an excise tax of not more than 13% on the amount charged to any
person on a nightly room rate at any accommodation or business that is required to
obtain a vacation rental permit from the city.
And shall the revenue generated from such tax be utilized for the purpose funding
infrastructure maintenance, environmental initiatives, and affordable housing, with
the rate of tax being allowed to be increased or decreased without further voter
approval so long as the rate of taxation does not exceed 13%; and shall the city be
authorized to collect, keep, and spend the revenues from such tax and any
investment income therefrom notwithstanding the limits of Article X, Section 20
of the Colorado Constitution?”
Vote Yes 176 55%
Vote No 135 42%
DK/Refused 11 3%
52
Toplines July 2022
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals Job 3189
Actual sample: 322 6
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
18. Lastly, below is one last comprehensive proposed tax increase on ALL types of
lodging permitted in Aspen, but with variable rates. Would you vote YES or NO for
this proposal:
-- Impose a new 3% tax on hotel stays;
-- Impose a new 6% tax on stays at fully managed condos;
-- Impose a new 8% tax on stays at owner-occupied units; and
-- Impose a new 13% tax on stays at units owned by non-resident investors.
Vote Yes 172 53%
Vote No 139 43%
DK/Refused 11 3%
D1. Age.
18-39 77 24%
40-64 166 51%
65-Up 79 25%
Refused 0 0%
D2. How long have you lived in Aspen?
0-10 years 59 18%
11-20 years 88 27%
21-30 years 73 23%
30+ years/Born here/native 100 31%
DK/Refused 1 0%
D3. Gender.
Men 164 51%
Women 155 48%
Non-binary/Other 3 1%
Refused 0 0%
D4. Do you own or rent you current place of residence?
Own 232 72%
Rent 89 28%
DK/Refused 1 0%
53
Toplines July 2022
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals Job 3189
Actual sample: 322 7
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
D5. IF OWN: Do you own any Aspen properties with a vacation rental permit
Yes 24 10%
No 208 90%
DK/Refused 0 0%
Survey
Online 280 87%
Phone 42 13%
54
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals --PARTY-- -YEARS IN -GENDER- --AGE-- -HOME- -INDEP.- -DEM-
July 2022 ASPEN-
Job 3189 STR
Nat/ Permit
TOTAL Dem Rep Ind 0-10 11-30 30+ M W 18-39 40-64 65+ Own Rent Holder M W M W
A 1 322 151 52 119 148 73 100 164 155 77 166 79 232 89 24 75 43 64 85
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
A. Registered to Vote/Party Registration.
Democrat 47% 100% 0% 0% 46% 52% 45% 39% 55% 57% 46% 40% 46% 50% 47% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Republican 16% 0% 100% 0% 15% 16% 18% 15% 17% 10% 16% 23% 15% 19% 22% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Independent 37% 0% 0% 100% 39% 32% 37% 46% 28% 33% 39% 37% 39% 31% 31% 100% 100% 0% 0%
1. Would you vote YES or NO to enact a new tax charged on short-term renters of Aspen homes that are licensed with a vacation rental permit?
Vote Yes 63% 77% 35% 56% 65% 58% 64% 60% 66% 66% 62% 61% 59% 74% 25% 54% 61% 75% 80%
Vote No 33% 18% 63% 40% 30% 37% 34% 35% 31% 24% 36% 36% 38% 20% 75% 41% 37% 17% 17%
DK/Refused 4% 5% 2% 4% 5% 5% 2% 5% 3% 9% 2% 4% 3% 7% 0% 5% 2% 8% 4%
Next, depending on the level of tax charged on Aspen short-term rentals, it could generate $10 million a year or more. Answer if you strongly approve, somewhat approve, or
disapprove of this new tax money being spent for each of the following. Here is the first one.
4. Maintenance of city infrastructure including “lifestyle enhancements’ such as pedestrian safety, bike lanes, and affordable restaurant and retail space for public benefit.
Strongly approve 36% 41% 27% 33% 39% 36% 32% 35% 36% 30% 39% 35% 36% 36% 25% 32% 35% 40% 41%
Somewhat approve 32% 31% 21% 39% 30% 34% 35% 33% 32% 29% 35% 31% 30% 38% 24% 44% 30% 24% 37%
Disapprove 31% 26% 52% 29% 30% 30% 33% 31% 32% 40% 27% 32% 34% 24% 50% 24% 35% 33% 22%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0%
Total Approve 68% 72% 48% 71% 69% 70% 67% 68% 68% 58% 73% 67% 66% 74% 50% 76% 65% 63% 78%
5. Environmental programs such as clean water quality, storm water treatment and healthy streams, wildfire mitigation, or greenhouse gas reduction
Strongly approve 48% 55% 25% 49% 46% 45% 52% 42% 54% 53% 44% 50% 48% 46% 25% 46% 57% 46% 61%
Somewhat approve 29% 28% 33% 29% 29% 30% 29% 30% 28% 23% 35% 23% 29% 31% 28% 27% 33% 33% 24%
Disapprove 22% 16% 42% 21% 24% 23% 18% 26% 18% 21% 21% 26% 22% 22% 46% 27% 11% 17% 14%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 0% 3% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 3% 0%
Total Approve 77% 83% 58% 78% 75% 75% 82% 73% 82% 76% 79% 73% 77% 77% 54% 72% 89% 79% 86%
6. Affordable housing “ construction, purchase, preservation of workforce housing.
Strongly approve 63% 74% 35% 62% 73% 51% 57% 62% 65% 79% 62% 49% 57% 80% 41% 59% 67% 73% 75%
Somewhat approve 18% 15% 23% 21% 11% 30% 21% 21% 15% 9% 17% 30% 20% 15% 21% 24% 15% 14% 14%
Disapprove 18% 11% 42% 17% 15% 19% 23% 16% 20% 10% 21% 21% 23% 6% 38% 16% 17% 11% 11%
DK/Refused 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Total Approve 81% 89% 58% 83% 84% 81% 77% 83% 80% 88% 79% 79% 77% 94% 62% 84% 83% 87% 89%
55
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals --PARTY-- -YEARS IN -GENDER- --AGE-- -HOME- -INDEP.- -DEM-
July 2022 ASPEN-
Job 3189 STR
Nat/ Permit
TOTAL Dem Rep Ind 0-10 11-30 30+ M W 18-39 40-64 65+ Own Rent Holder M W M W
A 2 322 151 52 119 148 73 100 164 155 77 166 79 232 89 24 75 43 64 85
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
7. Of these three, which would be your top priority use for money generated from a new short-term rental tax?
Maintenance of city
infrastructure. 20% 13% 46% 19% 19% 23% 21% 21% 19% 15% 20% 27% 24% 10% 26% 20% 15% 14% 11%
Environmental programs. 16% 18% 8% 17% 9% 18% 25% 13% 19% 7% 18% 20% 18% 11% 24% 16% 20% 13% 22%
Affordable housing. 63% 69% 44% 63% 71% 59% 53% 65% 61% 77% 62% 52% 57% 79% 50% 63% 65% 71% 67%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Next, a couple of questions about your opinion on how much the tax rate for new short-term rentals should be.
8. Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE setting the short-term rental tax rate to close the $4.4 million tax revenue gap between what hotels and lodges pay at the commercial property tax rate and what
the 1,200 permitted short-term rental properties pay at the residential property tax rate?
Support 63% 76% 40% 58% 64% 58% 67% 61% 67% 63% 66% 59% 60% 72% 25% 58% 59% 71% 80%
Oppose 34% 20% 60% 39% 31% 39% 32% 36% 30% 33% 32% 37% 37% 23% 75% 39% 37% 24% 17%
DK/Refused 3% 4% 0% 3% 5% 3% 1% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 3% 5% 0% 3% 4% 5% 4%
9. Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE setting the short-term rental tax rate to cover the fee - in whole or in part - of what every new commercial or large-scale residential property
MUST pay into the city’s affordable housing fund to provide housing to the service workers who provide services to the guests renting these 1,200 permitted properties?
Support 61% 70% 35% 60% 65% 53% 60% 62% 60% 70% 58% 58% 55% 76% 17% 65% 52% 70% 71%
Oppose 37% 27% 65% 38% 32% 44% 40% 36% 38% 27% 41% 38% 43% 21% 83% 33% 46% 29% 25%
DK/Refused 2% 3% 0% 2% 3% 3% 0% 2% 3% 3% 1% 4% 2% 3% 0% 3% 2% 2% 4%
56
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals --PARTY-- -YEARS IN -GENDER- --AGE-- -HOME- -INDEP.- -DEM-
July 2022 ASPEN-
Job 3189 STR
Nat/ Permit
TOTAL Dem Rep Ind 0-10 11-30 30+ M W 18-39 40-64 65+ Own Rent Holder M W M W
A 3 322 151 52 119 148 73 100 164 155 77 166 79 232 89 24 75 43 64 85
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
10. Knowing that a 5.4% per night tax rate on short-term rentals covers the $4.4 million property tax revenue gap and 20% per night covers 100% of the affordable housing fund
fee plus the “tax revenue gap,” which of these five options do you support?
a. None - zero percent. 26% 15% 50% 31% 24% 32% 25% 27% 25% 21% 27% 31% 31% 15% 63% 32% 28% 14% 14%
b. 5.4% - equal to the
$4.4 million property tax
revenue gap between
commercial and
residential rentals. 17% 17% 23% 15% 14% 15% 23% 18% 16% 10% 19% 20% 17% 17% 16% 16% 13% 19% 16%
c. 9.6% - closes the tax
gap and mitigates
one-third of the
affordable housing cost. 12% 11% 8% 15% 11% 13% 15% 13% 12% 14% 14% 6% 12% 14% 9% 14% 17% 14% 10%
d. 13% - closes the tax
gap and mitigates
two-thirds of the
affordable housing cost. 14% 16% 4% 17% 18% 14% 9% 10% 19% 17% 13% 14% 14% 15% 8% 13% 24% 10% 20%
e. 20% - closes the tax
gap and 100% of the
affordable housing cost. 28% 39% 15% 21% 30% 25% 28% 30% 26% 33% 26% 28% 24% 39% 4% 24% 15% 41% 36%
DK/Refused 2% 3% 0% 2% 3% 1% 0% 1% 3% 5% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% 1% 2% 2% 4%
11. Here is another factor with short-term rentals. There are three kinds of privately-owned residential properties that are permitted for short-term rentals in Aspen: Homes
the owners live in for all or part of the year; Homes owned by investors who are absentee owners; and Condos in a fully-managed lodge building. Do you think?
All three types should be
taxed at the same rate
for short-term rentals. 35% 32% 48% 33% 39% 33% 31% 40% 30% 26% 40% 33% 37% 30% 42% 35% 28% 40% 27%
Those rented out by
investors should be taxed
at a higher rate. 63% 66% 50% 66% 61% 66% 67% 58% 69% 71% 59% 66% 62% 69% 58% 62% 72% 59% 72%
DK/Refused 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 3% 0% 2% 1%
12. Following up, do you think short-term rentals in condos in fully managed buildings that have full-time staff on duty just like a hotel should be taxed?
At a lower rate than
other types of
properties. 25% 21% 27% 29% 25% 19% 29% 27% 23% 32% 22% 24% 25% 26% 13% 32% 26% 21% 22%
At the same rate as the
others. 73% 77% 71% 69% 73% 81% 68% 70% 75% 64% 77% 73% 73% 73% 87% 67% 72% 76% 77%
DK/Refused 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0% 3% 2% 1% 4% 1% 3% 2% 1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 1%
57
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals --PARTY-- -YEARS IN -GENDER- --AGE-- -HOME- -INDEP.- -DEM-
July 2022 ASPEN-
Job 3189 STR
Nat/ Permit
TOTAL Dem Rep Ind 0-10 11-30 30+ M W 18-39 40-64 65+ Own Rent Holder M W M W
A 4 322 151 52 119 148 73 100 164 155 77 166 79 232 89 24 75 43 64 85
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Next, do you AGREE or DISAGREE with these statements. Here is the first one.
13. Aspen greatly benefits from the tourist economy and we should not do anything that raises the cost to visit here or puts this vital economic engine at risk.
Agree 40% 26% 73% 43% 37% 42% 41% 41% 37% 39% 39% 41% 41% 36% 71% 44% 39% 25% 25%
Disagree 59% 74% 27% 54% 61% 56% 58% 56% 62% 58% 60% 58% 57% 64% 29% 52% 59% 73% 75%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 4% 2% 2% 0%
14. Since visitors staying in hotels and those staying in licensed short-term rentals both already pay the exact same sales tax and lodging tax, it is just not fair to impose
another large tax on visitors staying at privately-owned properties.
Agree 44% 34% 71% 45% 40% 53% 44% 41% 48% 34% 50% 42% 46% 39% 83% 41% 54% 32% 36%
Disagree 55% 65% 29% 52% 60% 43% 56% 57% 51% 64% 49% 57% 53% 60% 17% 56% 46% 68% 63%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 0% 2% 0% 4% 0% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 4% 0% 0% 1%
15. Aspen tourism has to be managed so it doesn’t ruin the residents’ quality of life and if requiring short-term renters to pay more taxes so these residential rental
businesses pay what other Aspen businesses must pay, that is okay.
Agree 69% 80% 48% 64% 72% 67% 66% 69% 69% 76% 67% 65% 65% 80% 25% 66% 63% 81% 80%
Disagree 30% 19% 50% 35% 28% 30% 33% 30% 29% 23% 32% 32% 35% 17% 75% 33% 37% 19% 18%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 0% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 2%
16. Having heard this information about taxing short-term rentals and tourism, which option do you prefer?
Do not raise taxes on any
Aspen lodging. 31% 19% 54% 37% 28% 35% 32% 33% 28% 25% 31% 37% 35% 20% 71% 39% 30% 21% 17%
Raise taxes just on
short-term rentals of
private property. 42% 47% 31% 40% 46% 37% 41% 40% 45% 48% 41% 39% 39% 51% 8% 41% 41% 40% 53%
Raise taxes on all
lodging including hotels
and short-term rentals. 26% 32% 15% 21% 26% 25% 26% 26% 26% 27% 26% 23% 25% 28% 21% 19% 26% 38% 29%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 0% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 2% 2% 1%
17. Answer if you would vote YES or NO on the following ballot: BALLOT WORDING.
Vote Yes 55% 68% 25% 50% 57% 54% 53% 54% 55% 60% 55% 48% 51% 64% 17% 54% 43% 67% 70%
Vote No 42% 28% 73% 46% 39% 45% 44% 41% 42% 34% 43% 47% 46% 32% 83% 42% 52% 29% 28%
DK/Refused 3% 3% 2% 4% 5% 1% 3% 4% 3% 7% 1% 5% 3% 3% 0% 4% 4% 5% 2%
58
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals --PARTY-- -YEARS IN -GENDER- --AGE-- -HOME- -INDEP.- -DEM-
July 2022 ASPEN-
Job 3189 STR
Nat/ Permit
TOTAL Dem Rep Ind 0-10 11-30 30+ M W 18-39 40-64 65+ Own Rent Holder M W M W
A 5 322 151 52 119 148 73 100 164 155 77 166 79 232 89 24 75 43 64 85
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
18. Lastly, below is one last comprehensive proposed tax increase on ALL types of lodging permitted in Aspen, but with variable rates. Would you vote YES or NO for this
proposal: Impose a new 3% tax on hotel stays; Impose a new 6% tax on stays at fully managed condos; Impose a new 8% tax on stays at owner-occupied units; and Impose a new 13%
tax on stays at units owned by non-resident investors.
Vote Yes 53% 66% 31% 48% 60% 46% 50% 49% 58% 60% 54% 45% 49% 66% 25% 46% 52% 59% 70%
Vote No 43% 30% 67% 50% 36% 53% 46% 47% 39% 34% 43% 52% 48% 31% 75% 52% 46% 35% 27%
DK/Refused 3% 5% 2% 2% 4% 1% 4% 4% 3% 7% 2% 3% 3% 3% 0% 3% 2% 6% 4%
D1. Age.
18-39 24% 29% 15% 21% 40% 7% 12% 21% 27% 100% 0% 0% 19% 35% 8% 16% 30% 33% 25%
40-64 51% 50% 50% 54% 51% 67% 41% 50% 54% 0% 100% 0% 51% 53% 55% 57% 50% 46% 54%
65-Up 25% 21% 35% 25% 9% 26% 47% 29% 19% 0% 0% 100% 30% 12% 37% 27% 20% 21% 20%
Refused 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
D2. How long have you lived in Aspen?
0-10 years 18% 16% 25% 18% 40% 0% 0% 19% 17% 35% 17% 5% 14% 29% 13% 15% 24% 22% 11%
11-20 years 27% 29% 17% 30% 60% 0% 0% 26% 29% 42% 29% 11% 26% 33% 25% 27% 35% 30% 29%
21-30 years 23% 25% 23% 20% 0% 100% 0% 24% 22% 7% 30% 24% 24% 21% 38% 27% 9% 17% 31%
30+ years/Born
here/native 31% 30% 35% 31% 0% 0% 100% 30% 32% 15% 25% 59% 37% 17% 24% 30% 33% 30% 29%
DK/Refused 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0%
D3. Gender.
Men 51% 43% 48% 63% 50% 54% 50% 100% 0% 45% 49% 59% 50% 52% 45% 100% 0% 100% 0%
Women 48% 56% 52% 37% 49% 46% 49% 0% 100% 53% 51% 38% 49% 47% 50% 0% 100% 0% 100%
Non-binary/Other 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Refused 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
D4. Do you own or rent you current place of residence?
Own 72% 71% 67% 76% 63% 75% 85% 71% 73% 58% 72% 87% 100% 0% 100% 76% 76% 71% 71%
Rent 28% 29% 33% 23% 37% 25% 15% 28% 27% 41% 28% 13% 0% 100% 0% 23% 24% 29% 29%
DK/Refused 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0%
D5. IF OWN: Do you own any Aspen properties with a vacation rental permit
Yes 10% 10% 16% 8% 10% 17% 7% 9% 11% 5% 11% 13% 10% 100% 8% 9% 9% 10%
No 90% 90% 84% 92% 90% 83% 93% 91% 89% 95% 89% 87% 90% 0% 92% 91% 91% 90%
DK/Refused 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
59
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals --PARTY-- -YEARS IN -GENDER- --AGE-- -HOME- -INDEP.- -DEM-
July 2022 ASPEN-
Job 3189 STR
Nat/ Permit
TOTAL Dem Rep Ind 0-10 11-30 30+ M W 18-39 40-64 65+ Own Rent Holder M W M W
A 6 322 151 52 119 148 73 100 164 155 77 166 79 232 89 24 75 43 64 85
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Survey
Online 87% 89% 81% 87% 86% 89% 88% 83% 92% 83% 92% 81% 91% 78% 100% 85% 91% 86% 92%
Phone 13% 11% 19% 13% 14% 11% 12% 17% 8% 17% 8% 19% 9% 22% 0% 15% 9% 14% 8%
60
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals -STR: -STR: -TAX ALL --PREFERRED STR RATE-- -STR “NOT -PREFERRED
July 2022 INITIAL BALLOT LODGING: FAIR” TAX INCREASE-
Job 3189 CONCEPT- LANGUAGE- VARIABLE
RATES- Total Total STR All
TOTAL Yes No Yes No Yes No None 5.4% 9.6% 13% 20% 13%+ 9.6% Agree Disagree None Only Lodging
B 1 322 202 106 176 135 172 139 85 55 40 46 90 136 176 143 176 100 136 82
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
A. Registered to Vote/Party Registration.
Democrat 47% 58% 25% 59% 32% 58% 32% 26% 46% 44% 52% 64% 60% 57% 37% 56% 29% 53% 60%
Republican 16% 9% 30% 7% 28% 9% 25% 30% 21% 11% 5% 8% 7% 8% 26% 9% 28% 12% 9%
Independent 37% 33% 45% 34% 41% 33% 43% 43% 32% 45% 44% 27% 33% 36% 38% 36% 43% 35% 31%
1. Would you vote YES or NO to enact a new tax charged on short-term renters of Aspen homes that are licensed with a vacation rental permit?
Vote Yes 63% 100% 0% 94% 24% 92% 29% 4% 65% 85% 94% 93% 93% 92% 31% 89% 5% 90% 90%
Vote No 33% 0% 100% 4% 71% 6% 68% 94% 24% 12% 6% 3% 4% 6% 63% 9% 91% 7% 5%
DK/Refused 4% 0% 0% 2% 5% 2% 3% 2% 11% 3% 0% 3% 2% 2% 6% 2% 4% 3% 5%
Next, depending on the level of tax charged on Aspen short-term rentals, it could generate $10 million a year or more. Answer if you strongly approve, somewhat approve, or
disapprove of this new tax money being spent for each of the following. Here is the first one.
4. Maintenance of city infrastructure including “lifestyle enhancements” such as pedestrian safety, bike lanes, and affordable restaurant and retail space for public benefit.
Strongly approve 36% 49% 14% 49% 18% 49% 19% 14% 33% 40% 52% 47% 49% 47% 21% 48% 12% 45% 49%
Somewhat approve 32% 34% 28% 34% 29% 35% 30% 24% 45% 37% 26% 35% 32% 33% 32% 32% 25% 37% 34%
Disapprove 31% 17% 58% 16% 53% 16% 51% 62% 22% 23% 22% 17% 18% 19% 45% 19% 60% 19% 17%
DK/Refused 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 0% 0%
Total Approve 68% 83% 42% 84% 46% 83% 49% 38% 78% 77% 78% 82% 81% 80% 53% 81% 38% 81% 83%
5. Environmental programs such as clean water quality, storm water treatment and healthy streams, wildfire mitigation, or greenhouse gas reduction
Strongly approve 48% 63% 20% 64% 25% 64% 28% 15% 60% 57% 67% 57% 60% 59% 30% 63% 16% 57% 72%
Somewhat approve 29% 27% 35% 26% 35% 26% 34% 30% 33% 35% 22% 29% 27% 29% 35% 24% 32% 34% 18%
Disapprove 22% 10% 46% 10% 38% 10% 38% 53% 7% 8% 11% 13% 12% 11% 33% 13% 50% 9% 10%
DK/Refused 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 3% 0% 0%
Total Approve 77% 90% 54% 90% 60% 89% 62% 45% 93% 92% 89% 86% 87% 88% 65% 87% 47% 91% 90%
6. Affordable housing - construction, purchase, preservation of workforce housing.
Strongly approve 63% 81% 29% 82% 38% 80% 42% 24% 72% 72% 83% 80% 81% 79% 47% 77% 28% 79% 79%
Somewhat approve 18% 14% 25% 14% 24% 15% 23% 23% 18% 25% 13% 15% 14% 17% 22% 14% 25% 16% 13%
Disapprove 18% 4% 46% 4% 38% 5% 35% 53% 9% 2% 4% 6% 5% 5% 30% 9% 45% 5% 8%
DK/Refused 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0%
Total Approve 81% 96% 54% 96% 62% 95% 65% 47% 91% 98% 96% 94% 95% 95% 69% 91% 54% 95% 92%
61
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals -STR: -STR: -TAX ALL --PREFERRED STR RATE-- -STR “NOT -PREFERRED
July 2022 INITIAL BALLOT LODGING: FAIR” TAX INCREASE-
Job 3189 CONCEPT- LANGUAGE- VARIABLE
RATES- Total Total STR All
TOTAL Yes No Yes No Yes No None 5.4% 9.6% 13% 20% 13%+ 9.6% Agree Disagree None Only Lodging
B 2 322 202 106 176 135 172 139 85 55 40 46 90 136 176 143 176 100 136 82
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
7. Of these three, which would be your top priority use for money generated from a new short-term rental tax?
Maintenance of city
infrastructure. 20% 13% 35% 13% 32% 12% 31% 42% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 25% 16% 35% 15% 12%
Environmental programs. 16% 17% 15% 18% 14% 18% 15% 15% 20% 13% 17% 17% 17% 16% 17% 15% 17% 15% 17%
Affordable housing. 63% 70% 50% 70% 53% 70% 54% 42% 67% 75% 70% 70% 70% 71% 58% 67% 47% 70% 71%
DK/Refused 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0%
Next, a couple of questions about your opinion on how much the tax rate for new short-term rentals should be.
8. Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE setting the short-term rental tax rate to close the $4.4 million tax revenue gap between what hotels and lodges pay at the commercial property tax rate and what
the 1,200 permitted short-term rental properties pay at the residential property tax rate?
Support 63% 91% 14% 92% 27% 89% 32% 7% 65% 85% 92% 93% 93% 91% 34% 89% 12% 90% 82%
Oppose 34% 8% 84% 7% 70% 9% 66% 92% 31% 15% 6% 4% 5% 7% 61% 10% 85% 7% 16%
DK/Refused 3% 1% 2% 1% 4% 1% 2% 1% 4% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 1% 3% 2% 2%
9. Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE setting the short-term rental tax rate to cover the fee - in whole or in part - of what every new commercial or large-scale residential property
MUST pay into the city’s affordable housing fund to provide housing to the service workers who provide services to the guests renting these 1,200 permitted properties?
Support 61% 84% 17% 86% 27% 83% 34% 13% 60% 80% 83% 89% 87% 85% 34% 82% 16% 81% 82%
Oppose 37% 15% 82% 13% 71% 16% 64% 87% 36% 20% 17% 9% 12% 14% 62% 18% 81% 17% 17%
DK/Refused 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 0% 4% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 4% 0% 3% 1% 1%
62
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals -STR: -STR: -TAX ALL --PREFERRED STR RATE-- -STR “NOT -PREFERRED
July 2022 INITIAL BALLOT LODGING: FAIR” TAX INCREASE-
Job 3189 CONCEPT- LANGUAGE- VARIABLE
RATES- Total Total STR All
TOTAL Yes No Yes No Yes No None 5.4% 9.6% 13% 20% 13%+ 9.6% Agree Disagree None Only Lodging
B 3 322 202 106 176 135 172 139 85 55 40 46 90 136 176 143 176 100 136 82
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
10. Knowing that a 5.4% per night tax rate on short-term rentals covers the $4.4 million property tax revenue gap and 20% per night covers 100% of the affordable housing fund
fee plus the “tax revenue gap,” which of these five options do you support?
a. None - zero percent. 26% 1% 76% 2% 59% 3% 58% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 49% 7% 78% 2% 4%
b. 5.4% - equal to the
$4.4 million property tax
revenue gap between
commercial and
residential rentals. 17% 18% 12% 14% 21% 13% 21% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 24% 12% 12% 19% 22%
c. 9.6% - closes the tax
gap and mitigates
one-third of the
affordable housing cost. 12% 17% 5% 18% 5% 16% 9% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 23% 9% 15% 4% 19% 11%
d. 13% - closes the tax
gap and mitigates
two-thirds of the
affordable housing cost. 14% 21% 3% 22% 5% 23% 4% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 33% 26% 6% 21% 1% 24% 14%
e. 20% - closes the tax
gap and 100% of the
affordable housing cost. 28% 42% 3% 43% 9% 45% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 67% 51% 10% 43% 3% 35% 47%
DK/Refused 2% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2%
11. Here is another factor with short-term rentals. There are three kinds of privately-owned residential properties that are permitted for short-term rentals in Aspen: Homes
the owners live in for all or part of the year; Homes owned by investors who are absentee owners; and Condos in a fully-managed lodge building. Do you think?
All three types should be
taxed at the same rate
for short-term rentals. 35% 30% 48% 26% 48% 27% 47% 49% 37% 15% 31% 34% 33% 29% 40% 31% 49% 27% 33%
Those rented out by
investors should be taxed
at a higher rate. 63% 70% 50% 74% 49% 73% 51% 49% 62% 85% 69% 65% 66% 70% 59% 67% 49% 73% 65%
DK/Refused 2% 0% 2% 0% 3% 0% 1% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2%
12. Following up, do you think short-term rentals in condos in fully managed buildings that have full-time staff on duty just like a hotel should be taxed?
At a lower rate than
other types of
properties. 25% 22% 31% 21% 31% 24% 26% 32% 20% 34% 19% 21% 20% 23% 27% 24% 30% 28% 13%
At the same rate as the
others. 73% 77% 66% 79% 67% 76% 73% 66% 78% 66% 81% 78% 79% 76% 72% 74% 68% 71% 84%
DK/Refused 2% 1% 3% 0% 2% 0% 1% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2%
63
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals -STR: -STR: -TAX ALL --PREFERRED STR RATE-- -STR “NOT -PREFERRED
July 2022 INITIAL BALLOT LODGING: FAIR” TAX INCREASE-
Job 3189 CONCEPT- LANGUAGE- VARIABLE
RATES- Total Total STR All
TOTAL Yes No Yes No Yes No None 5.4% 9.6% 13% 20% 13%+ 9.6% Agree Disagree None Only Lodging
B 4 322 202 106 176 135 172 139 85 55 40 46 90 136 176 143 176 100 136 82
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Next, do you AGREE or DISAGREE with these statements. Here is the first one.
13. Aspen greatly benefits from the tourist economy and we should not do anything that raises the cost to visit here or puts this vital economic engine at risk.
Agree 40% 16% 83% 15% 70% 17% 68% 84% 46% 27% 11% 13% 12% 16% 72% 13% 88% 18% 17%
Disagree 59% 84% 16% 83% 29% 83% 29% 14% 49% 73% 89% 87% 88% 84% 26% 86% 10% 81% 82%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 3% 2% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1%
14. Since visitors staying in hotels and those staying in licensed short-term rentals both already pay the exact same sales tax and lodging tax, it is just not fair to impose
another large tax on visitors staying at privately-owned properties.
Agree 44% 22% 84% 22% 73% 23% 69% 82% 62% 32% 17% 16% 16% 20% 100% 0% 86% 19% 34%
Disagree 55% 78% 14% 78% 25% 77% 28% 14% 38% 68% 83% 84% 84% 80% 0% 100% 11% 80% 66%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 0% 3% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0%
15. Aspen tourism has to be managed so it doesn’t ruin the residents’ quality of life and if requiring short-term renters to pay more taxes so these residential rental
businesses pay what other Aspen businesses must pay, that is okay.
Agree 69% 95% 20% 97% 32% 95% 35% 15% 73% 85% 96% 97% 96% 94% 40% 92% 13% 97% 92%
Disagree 30% 4% 79% 2% 66% 5% 63% 84% 27% 10% 4% 3% 4% 5% 60% 6% 85% 2% 8%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% 0%
16. Having heard this information about taxing short-term rentals and tourism, which option do you prefer?
Do not raise taxes on any
Aspen lodging. 31% 2% 86% 3% 68% 4% 65% 92% 22% 10% 2% 3% 3% 4% 60% 6% 100% 0% 0%
Raise taxes just on
short-term rentals of
private property. 42% 60% 10% 62% 17% 56% 26% 4% 46% 65% 72% 52% 59% 60% 19% 62% 0% 100% 0%
Raise taxes on all
lodging including hotels
and short-term rentals. 26% 37% 4% 34% 13% 39% 8% 3% 33% 22% 26% 42% 37% 34% 20% 31% 0% 0% 100%
DK/Refused 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 3% 0% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0%
17. Answer if you would vote YES or NO on the following ballot: BALLOT WORDING.
Vote Yes 55% 82% 7% 100% 0% 87% 17% 5% 45% 80% 85% 85% 85% 83% 28% 78% 6% 80% 73%
Vote No 42% 16% 91% 0% 100% 12% 81% 94% 51% 18% 15% 13% 14% 15% 69% 19% 92% 17% 22%
DK/Refused 3% 2% 3% 0% 0% 1% 2% 1% 3% 3% 0% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 3% 5%
64
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals -STR: -STR: -TAX ALL --PREFERRED STR RATE-- -STR “NOT -PREFERRED
July 2022 INITIAL BALLOT LODGING: FAIR” TAX INCREASE-
Job 3189 CONCEPT- LANGUAGE- VARIABLE
RATES- Total Total STR All
TOTAL Yes No Yes No Yes No None 5.4% 9.6% 13% 20% 13%+ 9.6% Agree Disagree None Only Lodging
B 5 322 202 106 176 135 172 139 85 55 40 46 90 136 176 143 176 100 136 82
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
18. Lastly, below is one last comprehensive proposed tax increase on ALL types of lodging permitted in Aspen, but with variable rates. Would you vote YES or NO for this
proposal: Impose a new 3% tax on hotel stays; Impose a new 6% tax on stays at fully managed condos; Impose a new 8% tax on stays at owner-occupied units; and Impose a new 13%
tax on stays at units owned by non-resident investors.
Vote Yes 53% 79% 10% 85% 15% 100% 0% 6% 40% 70% 87% 86% 86% 82% 28% 76% 7% 71% 82%
Vote No 43% 20% 89% 14% 83% 0% 100% 94% 52% 30% 13% 12% 12% 16% 67% 22% 91% 27% 13%
DK/Refused 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 7% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 5% 2% 2% 2% 5%
D1. Age.
18-39 24% 25% 18% 26% 19% 27% 19% 19% 15% 27% 28% 28% 28% 28% 18% 28% 19% 27% 26%
40-64 51% 51% 56% 52% 53% 52% 52% 53% 57% 61% 48% 47% 48% 50% 58% 46% 52% 50% 52%
65-Up 25% 24% 27% 21% 28% 21% 30% 29% 29% 12% 24% 25% 24% 22% 23% 26% 29% 23% 22%
Refused 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
D2. How long have you lived in Aspen?
0-10 years 18% 20% 15% 20% 16% 22% 13% 14% 15% 10% 20% 27% 24% 21% 15% 22% 11% 23% 20%
11-20 years 27% 27% 26% 28% 26% 29% 25% 27% 23% 30% 39% 22% 28% 28% 27% 29% 30% 27% 27%
21-30 years 23% 21% 25% 22% 24% 19% 28% 28% 20% 23% 22% 20% 21% 21% 27% 18% 26% 20% 22%
30+ years/Born
here/native 31% 32% 32% 30% 33% 29% 33% 30% 42% 37% 20% 31% 27% 29% 31% 32% 32% 30% 32%
DK/Refused 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0%
D3. Gender.
Men 51% 49% 53% 51% 50% 47% 56% 52% 54% 55% 37% 54% 48% 50% 47% 54% 54% 48% 51%
Women 48% 51% 45% 49% 48% 52% 44% 45% 46% 45% 63% 45% 51% 50% 52% 45% 44% 51% 49%
Non-binary/Other 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0%
Refused 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
D4. Do you own or rent you current place of residence?
Own 72% 68% 83% 68% 78% 66% 80% 83% 72% 70% 72% 62% 65% 66% 76% 70% 82% 67% 69%
Rent 28% 32% 16% 32% 21% 34% 20% 16% 28% 30% 28% 38% 35% 34% 24% 30% 17% 33% 31%
DK/Refused 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0%
D5. IF OWN: Do you own any Aspen properties with a vacation rental permit
Yes 10% 4% 21% 3% 19% 5% 16% 21% 10% 8% 6% 2% 3% 4% 19% 3% 21% 2% 9%
No 90% 96% 79% 97% 81% 95% 84% 79% 90% 92% 94% 98% 97% 96% 81% 97% 79% 98% 91%
DK/Refused 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
65
City of Aspen/Short-Term Rentals -STR: -STR: -TAX ALL --PREFERRED STR RATE-- -STR “NOT -PREFERRED
July 2022 INITIAL BALLOT LODGING: FAIR” TAX INCREASE-
Job 3189 CONCEPT- LANGUAGE- VARIABLE
RATES- Total Total STR All
TOTAL Yes No Yes No Yes No None 5.4% 9.6% 13% 20% 13%+ 9.6% Agree Disagree None Only Lodging
B 6 322 202 106 176 135 172 139 85 55 40 46 90 136 176 143 176 100 136 82
FrederickPolls 350 South 200 East, #722 (703) 801-9506
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Survey
Online 87% 91% 90% 93% 86% 93% 86% 91% 80% 90% 91% 90% 90% 90% 87% 89% 87% 90% 86%
Phone 13% 9% 10% 7% 14% 7% 14% 9% 20% 10% 9% 10% 10% 10% 13% 11% 13% 10% 14%
66
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page | 1
T ECHNICAL M EMORANDUM
To: Phillip Supino, Community Development Director, City of
Aspen
From: Andrew Knudtsen and Rachel Shindman, Economic &
Planning Systems
Subject: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis; EPS #223033
Date: May 19, 2022
This technical memorandum summarizes the study supporting a
fee program to be applied to short term accommodation unit (short
term rental or “STR”) licensees in the City of Aspen. Economic &
Planning Systems (EPS) was retained by the City to determine a
reasonable fee for this program. The analysis outlines two fee
components, demonstrating a reasonable relationship between
guest spending from STRs in the city and the demand for local
employees and the corresponding housing needs, as well as
administrative costs incurred by the City in regulating STRs. The
study uses economic impact techniques to quantify the
relationships between guest spending when staying in STRs and
the number of jobs and employee-households supported in the
local economy by that spending. For the administrative fee
component, the analysis is based on the City’s estimate of fully
loaded personnel costs and direct expenditures that are necessary
to manage STRs.
Guests staying in STRs spend money in the local economy, and that
spending in turn creates local jobs. The employees holding these
jobs then seek housing units. Many of the jobs created are at wage
levels that do not pay enough for employees to afford housing in the
city. The basis of this fee is therefore the gap between what
employees can afford and the cost to provide affordable housing in
the City of Aspen (using recently updated fee calculations to
determine the financial gaps by income category within the City’s
established fee program).
The calculation also accounts for the possibility that a home used as
an STR could be occupied by a local resident, and the fee is further
differentiated based on this use. For this calculation, the fee reflects
the difference between the impact of guest spending in the local
economy and the baseline impact of local resident spending.
33067
Memorandum: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis
Page | 2
Rationale
This fee is needed to support the costs incurred by the City to manage STRs, as well as to
support the local labor force and City housing programs that sustain the tourism economy
in Aspen. Without an adequate supply of housing and housing support programs, the City
risks losing some of its labor supply that is essential to the quality of service and viability
of businesses in which STR guests spend money during their stay. This is important, as
tourism is a primary element of the City’s economic base. If businesses do not have an
adequate labor force and if workers do not have adequate housing, the guest experience
and the City’s economy are likely to degrade.
STR owners or hosts will pay an annual licensing fee under this program. The fee payers
receive benefits through investment by the City in housing for the workforce needed to
sustain the visitor economy. STR owners and operators are likely to benefit from the
supply of labor and from investments the City will make using the fee revenue on housing
for the local workforce. Having more housing options for the local workforce is also likely
to benefit the fee payers in better customer service through increased employee
retention and reduced employee turnover.
Administrative Fee
Methodology
The City of Aspen incurs costs to administer and regulate STRs beyond the standard costs
of government. Five departments in particular shoulder this cost: Police, Community
Development, Finance, Legal, and Administration. This analysis calculates a fee to be
charged to STRs to account for these costs.
Model inputs were provided by City of Aspen staff, reflecting current expenditures (staff
time and costs) associated with administering and regulating STRs. The new position
being added by Community Development to address STRs is also included in this
analysis. Given the increased level of cost associated with dispersed STR units compared
to developments that include a front desk and corresponding services (i.e., condo hotels),
costs are allocated proportionally.
Analysis and Fee Calculation
As shown in Table 1, the City of Aspen incurs $315,400 in annual costs associated with
STRs, including the new Community Development position. These include staffing costs
for enforcement, tax compliance, police calls (e.g., for trash, noise), and legal issues, as
well as software costs to manage licenses and revenue.
33168
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page | 3
Table 1. City of Aspen STR Costs
The allocation of these costs is broken out between dispersed STRs and developments
with front desks that are fully staffed to service guests, shown in Table 2. As shown,
Condo Hotel units account for 34 percent of overall City costs, or $106,300 annually,
while dispersed STR units account for 66 percent of costs ($209,100 per year).
Table 2. STR Costs by Type
The last step in this analysis is to calculate the per-unit fee to be charged annually. As
shown in Table 3, Condo Hotel units account for approximately 40 percent of the City’s
STR inventory, or about 520 units. The total annual cost to the City of $106,300 results
in an annual per-unit fee of $204. Dispersed STR units account for approximately 60
percent of the City’s inventory, or 780 units. Annual costs of $209,100 result in an annual
fee of $268 per unit.
Description Total Annual Cost
Community Development
Enforcement $4,000
Non-enforcement $136,000
Police $10,900
Finance $102,200
Legal $50,000
Admin $12,300
Total STR Costs $315,400
Source: City of Aspen; Economic & Planning Systems
Description Share Cost Share Cost
Community Development
Enforcement 0% $0 100% $4,000
Non-enforcement 40% $54,400 60% $81,600
Police 10% $1,100 90% $9,800
Finance 40% $40,900 60% $61,300
Legal 10% $5,000 90% $45,000
Admin 40%$4,900 60%$7,400
Total STR Costs 34% $106,300 66% $209,100
Source: City of Aspen; Economic & Planning Systems
Condo Hotels Dispersed STRs
33269
Memorandum: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis
Page | 4
Table 3. STR Administrative Fee per Unit, by Type
Housing Fee
Methodology
This analysis uses a jobs-housing economic impact model to quantify the jobs supported
by guest spending in STRs. The analysis begins by quantifying the jobs supported by
spending. Next, several analytical steps are taken to translate the supported jobs to
employees by income level.
The IMPLAN model (Impact Analysis for Planning) was used to estimate the relationships
between spending and jobs supported. IMPLAN was developed by the Bureau of Land
Management, U.S. Forest Service, and the University of Minnesota and is widely used by
state and federal agencies, academic researchers, and local economic development
organizations to evaluate the economic impacts of proposed policies, new industries, and
land use changes.
Data Sources
Analysis inputs come from the following sources:
• Accommodation inventory: AirDNA (number of units, number of bedrooms, average
number of bedrooms per unit)
• STR occupancy rates: AirDNA
• Guest spending: Aspen Lodging Guest Survey, 2014-2016 (RRC Associates)
• Wages by Occupation: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)
• Median household income: U.S. Census (ACS 5-year estimates, City of Aspen)
• Jobs per employee: 2019 Aspen Community Survey Results (EPS and RRC Associates)
Description
Total
Cost
Cost per
Unit
Total
Cost
Cost per
Unit
520 units 780 units
Community Development
Enforcement $0 $0 $4,000 $5
Non-enforcement $54,400 $105 $81,600 $105
Police $1,100 $2 $9,800 $13
Finance $40,900 $79 $61,300 $79
Legal $5,000 $10 $45,000 $58
Admin $4,900 $9 $7,400 $9
Total STR Costs $106,300 $204 $209,100 $268
Source: City of Aspen; Economic & Planning Systems
Condo Hotels Dispersed STRs
33370
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page | 5
Guest Spending Analysis
• Guest spending – Guest spending was modeled on the average daily expenditure
across various spending categories, as reported in Aspen Guest Surveys. Primary
data was available from 2014-2016 and was brought up to current levels in line with
escalations in STR rental rates (lodging spending). The survey data provides per unit
expenditures by type; based on this data, current expenditures average $1,337 per
unit per day, including $472 on food and beverage, $305 on retail/shopping, $407 on
entertainment and recreation, $34 on service, and $120 on transportation.
• Jobs supported by industry – The spending associated with guests is applied to the
IMPLAN model as an “industry output” event for the five affected industries (NAICS
72 – Accommodation and Food Services, NAICS 44-45 – Retail Trade, NAICS 71 –
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation, NAICS 81 – Other Service, and NAICS 48-49 –
Transportation and Warehousing). IMPLAN applies industry expenditure flows through
its input-output model and estimates the spending and jobs supported in the 20
major industries in the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
• Jobs to employees (multiple job holder adjustment) – An adjustment is made
to acknowledge that many employees have more than one job, such as two part time
jobs or a full time and a part time job. So as not to overestimate the number of
employees supported, the number of jobs is reduced using a factor of 1.40 jobs per
employee. This factor is specific to the City of Aspen, as reported by residents in the
2019 Aspen Community Survey (EPS and RRC Associates).
• Employees by industry to occupations and wages – A NAICS industry contains a
wide range of job types and wage ranges. For example, a worker in the retail NAICS
sector could be an accountant (for the retailer) or showroom employee (working the
retail floor). The range of wages and occupations supported is better represented by
the 21 Standard Occupational Classifications defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS). The National Industry by Occupation Matrix published by the BLS provides the
estimated distribution of occupations and wages for each NAICS category. The results
from the IMPLAN analysis are applied to the Industry by Occupation Matrix to
estimate the number of jobs by wage level supported.
• Tabulation of employees by income range – The last step involves counting the
number of employees supported by income range, expressed as a percentage of Area
Median Income (AMI). Given the breadth of need addressed by housing programs and
policies in the City of Aspen, all households earning up to 240 percent of AMI are
included for this analysis. The AMI definitions are based on the Aspen Pitkin County
Housing Authority (APCHA) 2021 income limits for the City of Aspen.
Local Resident Household Analysis
The last component of the analysis involves isolating the difference between guest
spending and local resident household spending. To do this, the same steps outlined
above are undertaken for a resident household earning the local median income of
$78,292 (as reported in the U.S. Census ACS 2019 data for Aspen) to document the jobs
supported from household spending in the economy.
33471
Memorandum: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis
Page | 6
This household income is input to the IMPLAN model, which applies an expenditure profile
(including savings) specific to the household income range. The model then estimates the
spending and jobs supported in the 20 major NAICS industries. The same steps to
determine need by AMI range are completed, and this housing need is then subtracted
from that of guest spending, resulting in the needs associated with guest spending above
those generated by a local resident household.
Analysis
Guest Spending
Guest spending was modeled on the average per-unit expenditure across food and
beverage, retail/shopping, entertainment and recreation, service, and transportation.
Within the IMPLAN model 1,000 accommodation units were modeled in order to establish
an appropriate scale of analysis. Per unit and per bedroom adjustments are made later in
the model to calibrate the fee.
As shown in Table 4, an average daily spending rate of $1,337 per unit per day results in
1,000 units’ total annual spending of $488 million. Note that at this point in the analysis
100 percent occupancy (365 days of spending) is used. The average annual occupancy
rate adjustment is applied later in the analysis.
33572
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page | 7
Table 4. Guest Spending
Description Factors Guest Spending
Program
Units 1,000
Guest Spending (per unit per day)
Food & beverage $472
Retail/shopping $305
Entertainment/recreational activities $407
Services $34
Transportation $120
Total $1,337
Annual Guest Spending (per unit per year)
Food & beverage 365 days (100% occ.)$172,121
Retail/shopping 365 days (100% occ.)$111,209
Entertainment/recreational activities 365 days (100% occ.)$148,474
Services 365 days (100% occ.)$12,358
Transportation 365 days (100% occ.)$43,879
Total $488,042
Total Guest Spending
Food & beverage 1,000 units $172,121,492
Retail/shopping 1,000 units $111,208,817
Entertainment/recreational activities 1,000 units $148,474,421
Services 1,000 units $12,358,242
Transportation 1,000 units $43,879,342
Total $488,042,314
Source: RRC Associates; Economic & Planning Systems
33673
Memorandum: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis
Page | 8
Jobs, Employees, and Households
As shown in Table 5, the spending associated with 1,000 accommodation units supports
4,218.48 jobs. The industries with the most jobs are those with direct spending impacts –
specifically accommodation and food services; arts, entertainment and recreation; and
retail.
Following total jobs, the next step is to translate jobs to employees. In today’s economy
it is common for people to hold more than one job. To step down from jobs to employees,
jobs are divided by a factor of 1.40 jobs per employee. As shown in Table 5, the
4,218.48 jobs supported by 1,000 accommodation units results in 3,013.20 employees
after the adjustment for multiple job holders.
Table 5. Jobs and Employees by Industry Supported from Guest Spending
Guest Spending
Description
Jobs by Industry
(IMPLAN Results)
Employees by
Category
Jobs to Employee Conversion Factor 1.40
Industrial Sectors
11 Ag, Forestry, Fish & Hunting 11.28 8.06
21 Mining 1.57 1.12
22 Utilities 2.46 1.76
23 Construction 13.62 9.73
31-33 Manufacturing 4.00 2.86
42 Wholesale Trade 20.46 14.61
44-45 Retail trade 444.79 317.71
48-49 Transportation & Warehousing 298.72 213.37
51 Information 16.86 12.04
52 Finance & insurance 57.54 41.10
53 Real estate & rental 117.05 83.61
54 Professional- scientific & tech svcs 99.97 71.41
55 Management of companies 38.30 27.36
56 Administrative & waste services 87.13 62.24
61 Educational svcs 11.29 8.06
62 Health & social services 38.40 27.43
71 Arts- entertainment & recreation 989.28 706.63
72 Accomodation & food services 1,743.21 1,245.15
81 Other services 215.74 154.10
91-99 Government & non NAICs 6.81 4.86
Total 4,218.48 3,013.20
Source: IMPLAN; Economic & Planning Systems
33774
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page | 9
Employees by Income
To translate employees to occupations and their related income levels, the jobs by NAICS
classification are converted to more specific occupation categories to obtain a detailed
distribution of wage levels for the new jobs, since using the average wage for an industry
masks the upper and lower wage levels. The BLS National Industry by Occupation Matrix
provides the estimated distribution of occupations for each NAICS category. The wages
for each occupation in Pitkin County are estimated by indexing the national wages by
occupation and industry to the average wage in that industry for Pitkin County.
Target Income Ranges
The last step in the guest spending analysis is to tabulate the employees at income levels
of 240 percent of AMI or less. For guest spending in 1,000 accommodation units, there
are 3,007.3 employees generated below 240 percent of AMI, as shown in Table 6. Of the
3,013.2 total employees, 99.8 percent are at incomes of 240 percent of AMI or less; the
balance of 0.2 percent are compensated sufficiently to afford market rate housing. In
total, these are the employees needed to support spending in the economy from 1,000
STR units.
Table 6. Households by AMI Supported by Guest Spending
Guest Spending
Total Employees Generated per 1,000 Units 3,013.2
Employees by Income Range
50% of Median 589.7
85% of Median 2,121.8
130% of Median 181.8
205% of Median 109.7
240% of Median 4.3
Total - Target Income Ranges 3,007.3
Percent of Employees Generated 99.8%
Source: Economic & Planning Systems
33875
Memorandum: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis
Page | 10
Employee Housing Needs
In 2021, the City of Aspen updated its Affordable Housing Fee-in-Lieu. This fee program
is calculated to account for the full costs of building employee housing, including land,
soft costs, hard (construction) costs, and employee ability to pay (as a revenue offset to
costs). These fees reflect the gap between the cost to provide housing and what
employees can afford to spend on housing, based on their income.
As shown in Table 7, fees range from $408,054 per employee earning up to 50 percent
AMI to $250,375 per employee earning between 205 and 240 percent AMI.
Table 7. Affordable Price and Gap by Income Range
Local Resident Spending
To isolate the effect of guest spending on housing need, a similar methodology was
followed to determine the relationship between a local resident household and housing
need. This was then subtracted from the guest impact.
Local resident spending was modeled based on the median household income in Aspen of
$78,292, as reported in the U.S. Census 2019 American Community Survey. As with
guest spending, 1,000 households were modeled and per household adjustment is made
to calculate the final fee. As shown in Table 8, a household income of $78,292 results in
a disposable income of $57,001 after accounting for payroll tax. Based on these figures,
the total disposable income for 1,000 households is $57.0 million.
Fee Category AMI Upper Bound Fee per FTE
Category 1 50% $408,054
Category 2 85% $376,475
Category 3 130% $345,691
Category 4 205% $302,879
Category 5 240% $250,375
Source: City of Aspen
33976
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page | 11
Table 8. Local Resident Household Income
Description Factors Local Spending
Program
Units 1,000
HH Income [1] (Aspen median)ACS 2019 5-Yr Estimate $78,292
Minus Payroll Tax
Federal $12,104
FICA $4,854
Medicare $1,135
State $3,198
Total Deductions $21,291
Net Pay / Adjusted Household Income $57,001
Total Annual Household Income 100%$78,292,000
Total Annual Payroll Rax 27%-$21,291,000
Disposable Income 73%$57,001,000
Source:US Census; Economic & Planning Systems
34077
Memorandum: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis
Page | 12
This income was input to IMPLAN, which then calculates the jobs supported by household
spending. As shown in Table 9, 1,000 households earning the median income support
172.87 jobs. Applying the multiple jobholder factor of 1.40 jobs per employee, this
spending results in 123.48 employees.
Table 9. Jobs and Employees by Industry Supported from Local Spending
Local Spending
Description
Jobs by Industry
(IMPLAN Results)
Employees by
Category
Jobs to Employee Conversion Factor 1.40
Industrial Sectors
11 Ag, Forestry, Fish & Hunting 1.71 1.22
21 Mining 0.15 0.11
22 Utilities 0.32 0.23
23 Construction 1.81 1.29
31-33 Manufacturing 0.62 0.44
42 Wholesale Trade 3.88 2.77
44-45 Retail trade 25.76 18.40
48-49 Transportation & Warehousing 3.93 2.81
51 Information 3.13 2.24
52 Finance & insurance 12.84 9.17
53 Real estate & rental 25.56 18.26
54 Professional- scientific & tech svcs 8.27 5.91
55 Management of companies 1.49 1.06
56 Administrative & waste services 7.90 5.64
61 Educational svcs 3.37 2.41
62 Health & social services 25.21 18.01
71 Arts- entertainment & recreation 5.76 4.11
72 Accomodation & food services 21.11 15.08
81 Other services 19.07 13.62
91-99 Government & non NAICs 0.98 0.70
Total 172.87 123.48
Source: IMPLAN; Economic & Planning Systems
34178
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page | 13
These employees were then categorized by occupation and wage following the same
methodology for guest spending. As shown in Table 10, local resident household
spending supports a total of 123.5 employees, 99.8 percent (123.3 households) of which
fall at or below 240 percent of AMI. The costs associated with providing affordable
housing for these employees are determined using the same methodology outlined for
guest spending.
Table 10. Households by AMI Supported by Local Spending
Local Spending
Total Employees Generated per 1,000 Units 123.5
Employees by Income Range
50% of Median 28.7
85% of Median 66.4
130% of Median 22.8
205% of Median 5.2
240% of Median 0.2
Total - Target Income Ranges 123.3
Percent of Employees Generated 99.8%
Source: Economic & Planning Systems
34279
Memorandum: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis
Page | 14
Fee Calculation
This section outlines the calculation of the accommodation unit license fee. There are four
key components to the fee calculation:
• Employees Supported – The number of employees at or below 240 percent of AMI
supported by guest spending form the basis of the fee, as these represent employees
needed in the community who cannot otherwise afford housing.
• Occupancy Rate – The impacts of guest spending were determined assuming 100
percent occupancy (i.e., 365 days per year) for modeling purposes and needs to be
adjusted for annual occupancy rates. An occupancy rate of 37.7 percent is applied to
the housing demand, based on the occupancy data for properties in the city from 2019
through 2021.
• Affordability Needs – The housing gap per employee and AMI range described
earlier ranges from $408,054 for employees earning up to 50 percent of AMI to
$250,375 for employees earning between 205 and 240 percent of AMI. The number
of employees in each AMI category (after accounting for the occupancy rate) are
multiplied by the need per employee to calculate the total housing cost. This is
calculated for both guest spending and local spending. Based on this calculation,
taking the total housing cost divided by the 1,000 units modeled, the gap per
accommodation unit is $428,933 and the gap per local household/housing unit is
$46,202.
• Adjustment for Local Households – To isolate the impact of guest spending above
the impact of a local household, the gap associated with local household spending
($46,202) is subtracted from the gap associated with guest spending ($428,933).
This results in a net gap per accommodation unit of $382,731.
This fee is then adjusted to reflect a per-bedroom figure (rather than per unit). EPS’s
analysis of the City’s STR inventory indicates that STRs have an average of 2.48
bedrooms per unit. This is then annualized over 30 years (divided by 30), which is a typical
financing period for a long-term housing investment. Based on this analysis, the
maximum fee per bedroom is $5,139, as shown in Table 11. This maximum fee amount
is the annualized cost of providing housing to the local workforce supported by guest
spending.
34380
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page | 15
Table 11. Fee Calculation
Local Spending Guest Spending
Employees Generated (per 1,000 units)A
50% of Median 28.7 589.7
85% of Median 66.4 2,121.8
130% of Median 22.8 181.8
205% of Median 5.2 109.7
240% of Median 0.2 4.3
Total per 1,000 Units 123.3 3,007.3
Per 1.0 Units 0.12 3.01
STR Occupancy Rate B 37.7%
Net Employees Generated (per 1,000 units)C
50% of Median A x B 28.7 222.6
85% of Median 66.4 800.7
130% of Median 22.8 68.6
205% of Median 5.2 41.4
240% of Median 0.2 1.6
Total per 1,000 Units 123.3 1,134.9
Per 1.0 Units 0.12 1.13
Fee per Employee by AMI Range D
50% of Median $408,054 $408,054
85% of Median $376,475 $376,475
130% of Median $345,691 $345,691
205% of Median $302,879 $302,879
240% of Median $250,375 $250,375
Total Fee E
50% of Median C x D $11,701,673 $90,818,313
85% of Median $25,008,937 $301,455,717
130% of Median $7,877,755 $23,716,677
205% of Median $1,571,697 $12,533,460
240% of Median $42,159 $408,972
Total $46,202,221 $428,933,138
Gap (Fee) per Unit F
E / 1000 -$46,202 -$428,933
Net STR Gap per Unit (minus local spend)-$382,731
Avg. Number of Bedrooms 2.48
Net STR Gap (Fee) per Bedroom -$154,165
Annualized Fee per Bedroom 30 years $5,139
Source: Economic & Planning Systems 34481
Memorandum: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis
Page | 16
Final Fee
The fee outlined above represents the maximum reasonable fee to be charged under this
program. Communities will generally apply a mitigation rate to this fee to determine the
final fee to be charged.
As shown in Table 12, a mitigation rate of 30 percent (aligning with the City’s current
residential program) would result in an annual per bedroom fee of $1,540, while a 65
percent mitigation rate (aligning with the City’s current commercial/lodge program)
would result in a fee of $3,080 per bedroom annually.
Table 12. Mitigation Rates
Description Fee Per Bedroom
Maximum Annual Fee $5,139
Mitigation Rate
30%$1,540
65%$3,080
Source: Economic & Planning Systems
34582
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.
Page | 17
Owner-Occupied Short Term Rentals
There is a desire in the City to create a separate licensing program for owner-occupied
properties, with a limit to the number of short-term rental days allowed per year. A unit
rented for a maximum of up to 90 days per year represents a maximum occupancy rate
of 24.7 percent, and thus justifies a separate fee calculation.
Additionally, since these units are occupied by local residents the impact of guest
spending occurs in addition to the impact of local spending. Thus, the impact of local
household spending is not netted out of the guest spending impact attributed to the STR.
As shown in Table 14, this results in a maximum annual fee per bedroom range from
$1,254 (30 days per year) to $3,763 (90 days per year).
As with the standard fee, a mitigation rate would be applied to determine the final fee to
be charged. Examples of the per-bedroom fee at a range of mitigation rate levels and
rental night maximums are shown in Table 13. For example, a 30 percent rate (aligning
with the City’s current residential program) and a maximum of 30 rental days per year
would result in an annual per bedroom fee of $380, while a 65 percent mitigation rate
(aligning with the City’s current commercial/lodge program) and a maximum of 90 rental
days per year would result in a fee of $1,510 per bedroom annually.
Table 13. Mitigation Rates – Owner Occupied Units
Description
30 days/year 60 days/year 90 days/year
Maximum Annual Fee $1,254 $2,509 $3,763
Mitigation Rate
30%$380 $380 $750
65%$820 $820 $1,510
Source: Economic & Planning Systems
Fee Per Bedroom
34683
Memorandum: Short Term Rental Fee Analysis
Page | 18
Table 14. Fee Calculation – Owner Occupied Units
30 days/year 60 days/year 90 days/year
Employees Generated (per 1,000 units)A
50% of Median 589.7 589.7 589.7
85% of Median 2,121.8 2,121.8 2,121.8
130% of Median 181.8 181.8 181.8
205% of Median 109.7 109.7 109.7
240% of Median 4.3 4.3 4.3
Total per 1,000 Units 3,007.3 3,007.3 3,007.3
Per 1.0 Units 3.01 3.01 3.01
STR Occupancy Rate B 8.2%16.4%24.7%
Net Employees Generated (per 1,000 units)C
50% of Median A x B 48.5 96.9 145.4
85% of Median 174.4 348.8 523.2
130% of Median 14.9 29.9 44.8
205% of Median 9.0 18.0 27.0
240% of Median 0.4 0.7 1.1
Total per 1,000 Units 247.2 494.3 741.5
Per 1.0 Units 0.25 0.49 0.74
Fee per Employee by AMI Range D
50% of Median $408,054 $408,054 $408,054
85% of Median $376,475 $376,475 $376,475
130% of Median $345,691 $345,691 $345,691
205% of Median $302,879 $302,879 $302,879
240% of Median $250,375 $250,375 $250,375
Total Fee E
50% of Median C x D $19,779,292 $39,558,584 $59,337,876
85% of Median $65,653,946 $131,307,893 $196,961,839
130% of Median $5,165,248 $10,330,495 $15,495,743
205% of Median $2,729,658 $5,459,317 $8,188,975
240% of Median $89,070 $178,140 $267,209
Total $93,417,214 $186,834,428 $280,251,642
Gap (Fee) per Unit F
E / 1000 -$93,417 -$186,834 -$280,252
Avg. Number of Bedrooms 2.48 2.48 2.48
Net STR Gap (Fee) per Bedroom -$37,629 -$75,257 -$112,886
Annualized Fee per Bedroom 30 years $1,254 $2,509 $3,763
Source: Economic & Planning Systems
Local Resident STR
34784
OUTREACH SUMMARYMAY 9, 2022ASPEN CITY COUNCIL UPDATE21985
DATA ANALYSIS INITIAL DATA FINDINGSCASE STUDY ANALYSISDATA FINDINGSINITIAL DRAFT POLICY IDEASPOLICY DRAFTINGPOLICY DRAFTINGIn December 2021, Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 26, Series 2021, a temporary moratorium on the issuance of new vacation rental permits (also known as short-term rental permits). During this time, and again in April 2022, an additional moratorium was instated on the issuance of residential building permits (Ordinance 27, 2021, and Ordinance 6, 2022). The moratorium on residential building permits is scheduled until June 8, 2022, and the moratorium on short-term rental (STR) permits extends until September 30, 2022. While residential building and short-term rentals are intertwined, the City facilitated two unique outreach campaigns, one for each focus area. Shaping Aspen’s Built Environment is an overarching outreach campaign that dives deep into STR and residential building activity in Aspen.This report is specifi c to STRs.Shaping Aspen’s Built Environment was in response to the moratorium and explores solutions that will improve regulations and respond to specific themes that correlate with STR activity, specifically in mountain communities throughout the United States. These themes include:PROJECT PLANNINGJAN2022ENGAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENTFEB2022TECHNICAL ADVISORY MEETINGS BEGIN1X1 INTERVIEWS BEGINAPR2022CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSIONSMAY2022CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSIONSSTR MORATORIUM ENDSOPEN HOUSEADOPTED ORDINANCES PROPOSEDDATA FINALIZATION AND POLICY UPDATESSEPT2022The chart below illustrates concurrent project planning eff orts and data analyses with arrows indicating where data, information, outreach results and community discussions are informing project components.1PROJECT PHASING AND DATA ANALYSIS FLOW CHARTOUTREACH SUMMARY: PROJECT PLANNING AND SCHEDULE• Zoning• Good Neighbor Policies• Operational Standards & Enforcement• Life Safety• Permitting• FinancialsPROMISE TO THE PUBLIC: Utilizing values and ethics from the International Association of Public Participation (IAP2) - which defines the development context, promise to the public, and how feedback would be put into action – the project team drafted a public engagement plan outlining goals and objectives, as well as anticipated stakeholders, engagement levels, and how best to communicate with them. The engagement approach focuses on:• Informing the community-at-large (public) of the project by providing balanced and objective information to assist them in understanding the “problem”, what alternatives may be appropriate, and what opportunities and/or solutions there might be to address change to current City policy.• Consulting with internal and external stakeholders to obtain feedback on current process successes and barriers, data analysis, policy alternatives, and involve them throughout the process to ensure their concerns and aspirations are consistently understood and considered.• Involving technical advisors on specific discrete policy questions that can further the data analysis and proposed code changes.PUTTING FEEDBACK INTO ACTION: The project team identified the need to work diligently to summarize engagement initiatives and findings in real-time to provide for a continuous information loop in and out of the policy development process to:• Set clear expectations with stakeholders and the community on engagement activities and how their feedback will be considered or incorporated in the policy development process.• Provide status updates through Aspen Community Voice and make engagement summaries readily available to the public.ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY #122086
Public engagement focused on facilitating dialogue about an aspirational vision for the community. A variety of mechanisms and tools were used to share information including one-on-one discussions with community members, focus groups, questionnaires, and public drop-in events. The project team created a webpage on Aspen Community Voice that hosts project information, outreach opportunities, key project dates, events, meeting registrations, and documents for review. Through a series of online tools on Aspen Community Voice and questions developed for technical stakeholders and community members alike, the project team gathered data points to assist Aspen City Council and staff in furthering project discussions around our STR themes: • Zoning• Good Neighbor Policies• Operational Standards & Enforcement• Life Safety• Permitting• FinancialsThese discussions, held both in-person and virtually, began with the launch of Aspen Community Voice on February 8, 2022, and continued with focus group sessions and publicly available questionnaires between February and April, and an Open House on April 6, 2022. Each tactic offered a different style of discussion with the project team: • Questionnaires(Consult) – Gauge public interest and concerns,as well as obtain public feedback on the direction of policydevelopment.• 1x1 Discussions (Consult) – Intentional meetings with passionate,invested, and/or expert parties to better understand existingconditions, opinions, and trends, as well as concerns andaspirations, and provide feedback on the process.• Focus Groups (Collaborate) - Data- and values-driven conversationswith technical advisors based upon initial data fi ndings and policyquestions pertaining to discussion points outlined above.• Open House (Consult) - Information sharing and values-basedconversations based upon community members experiences livingand working in Aspen.OUTREACH SUMMARY: SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITIESENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES COMPLETED TO DATE2The activities listed below illustrate distinct engagement activities that included technical stakeholder meetings, one-on-one interviews, two questionnaires,, an open house and presentations between January 25 and April 30, 2022. In total, there were approximately 760 participants across Aspen Community Voice (656), one-on-one interviews (11), technical stakeholder advisory group members (12), Aspen Chamber Resort Association (ACRA) and the Aspen Board of Realtors (ABOR) technical stakeholder meeting (~15), and the April 6, 2022 Open House (70).123MONDAY, MARCH 3, 2022Members from ACRA and the ABOR gathered to discuss STR activity in Aspen as it pertains to the lodging and real estate industry. 4TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 2022Members from ACRA and the ABOR gathered to discuss STR activity in Aspen as it pertains to the lodging and real estate industry. 5TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 2022Members from ACRA and the ABOR gathered to discuss short-term rental activity in Aspen as it pertains to the lodging and real estate industry. 678-18192021THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 2022Members from ACRA and the ABOR gathered to discuss STR activity in Aspen as it pertains to the lodging and real estate industry. WEDNESDAY, APRIL 6, 2022Public Open House event at City Hall from 4-6pm to collect feedback about the future of STRs in Aspen.TUESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2022Community Development Director presented to ACRA on the status of the moratorium and collected feedback from ACRA board members. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2022Launch of Aspen Community Voice Shaping Aspen’s Built Environment: STRs and online engagement activities.MONDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2022The Technical Advisory Group is comprised of 12 community members that represent their technical area of expertise in the community. Members gathered to discuss STR activity in Aspen as it pertains to the lodging and real estate industry. MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2022Launch of Aspen Community Voice Shaping Aspen’s Built Environment: STRs Questionnaire #1.FEBRUARY-APRIL, 2022Stakeholder interviews (11) to learn more about the current state of STRs, as well as concerns and recommendations for potential solutions. APRIL 19-29, 2022Launch of Aspen Community Voice Shaping Aspen’s Built Environment: STRs Questionnaire #2. 22TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2022Community Development Director presented on the status of the moratorium and collected feedback from ACRA and ABOR members. 22187
OUTREACH SUMMARY: COMMUNICATIONS AND PARTICIPATION3In order to meet the goals outlined by the project team, it was important to employ a variety of tactics to inform the public about how they could get involved in the engagement process, share their voice, and shape the future of STR activity in Aspen. Communication channels included: Aspen Community Voice (AspenCommunityVoice.com), Aspen Daily News advertisements, Aspen Times advertisements, Twitter (@cityofaspen), Facebook posts, events, and advertisements, Instagram, newsletters (ACRA, Colorado Conversations, and Community Development Updates), targeted email invitations (200+), Aspen 82 interviews, CGTV advertisements and media releases. Engagement activities and events included two (2) presentations to ACRA, one (1) Technical Stakeholder Meeting (ACRA and ABOR), eleven (11) one-on-one interviews, five (5) Technical Advisory Group meetings, one (1) Open House, two (2) online questionnaires on Aspen Community Voice, and receipt and response to 35 emails and inquiries.This coordinated communications and outreach initiative was intended to maximize information shared with the community and clearly identify opportunities for community members to engage with the project team both in-person and virtually. In total, there were: 15011x17 Posters placed in venues between Basalt and Aspen6,404Targeted event mailers for the April 6, 2022 Open House141 DAYSContinuously running digital ads in Aspen Times and Aspen Daily News159K+Digital ad impressions between Aspen Times and Aspen Daily News214New registrations on Aspen Community Voice platform562‘Engaged’ Visitors to the Shaping Aspen’s Built Environment + project page2.8KVisits to the Shaping Aspen’s Built Environment + STR project page322Largest number of visitors to ACVproject pages in one day~760Total participants across surveys, interviews, advisory groups, and the open house70Participants at the April 6, 2022 Open House at City Hall12Technical Advisory Group members that attended five (5) meetings656Project questionnaires taken on Aspen Community Voice 22288
OUTREACH SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS AND PARTICIPANT FEEDBACKZONINGTHEME KEY FINDINGSPARTICIPANT FEEDBACKNO.RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICTS SHOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY THAN COMMERCIAL AND LODGING DISTRICTS WHEN PERMITTING LOCATION OF STRS. 1ALLOW MARKET DEMAND TO DETERMINE HOW MANY STRS ARE PERMITTED PER ZONE DISTRICT. 2ALLOW MARKET DEMAND TO DETERMINE WHERE STRS ARE LOCATED THROUGHOUT ASPEN. 3In the first STR questionnaire hosted on Aspen Community Voice, 227 participants ranked their preference on where STRs should be permitted based on zone district. Most respondents felt that STRs should first be permitted in the Downtown Core, then lodge districts, then West End neighborhoods, then East End neighborhoods, followed by Cemetery Lane residential neighborhoods, then finally, residential neighborhoods outside of the roundabout. SHORT-TERM RENTAL ZONE DISTRICT PREFERENCES4DOWNTOWN CORE LODGE DISTRICTSMIXED-USE DISTRICTSWEST END RESIDENTIALEAST END RESIDENTIALCEMETERY LANE RESIDENTIAL1( THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED AT ALL)7(THEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED)65432OUTSIDE THE ROUNDABOUTBelow is a summary of high-level findings from discussions (Aspen Community Voice, Interviews, Focus Groups and an Open House) on STR activity in Aspen. General engagement opportunities were presented in various mediums, such as virtually and in person, to aid in access for participants to engage in the process. Of note was the availability of technical experts to have rich and intentional conversations with participants in order to attain high-quality qualitative and quantitative data to support ongoing analyses and case study work. Key findings do not represent consensus but rather indicate either a majority response or important discovery through conversations with technical stakeholders and community members.Regulating STRs in commercial and lodge zones differently from residential zones can create certainty in zoning and the land use process, as well as ensure that lodging development is compatible and appropriate within the context of the neighborhood. Allowing market demand to determine where and how many STRs are permitted per zone district increases the likelihood that residential zones will become increasingly attractive for STRs, impacting community character and livability. For example, in Park City, Utah, only 32.6% of all housing units (10,440 total) are occupied. Vacant seasonal and recreational housing units have nearly doubled since 2000 to 6,750 units, and Park City is the only city in Utah where the number of jobs (11,000) out numbers the population (8,500). Zoning regulations and affordable housing policies can help mitigate some of the impacts STRs have on housing, infrastructure, and other community impacts. In Durango, Colorado, only 39 STRs are allowed in residential zone districts to keep the majority of STRs in the commercial core. STRs are permitted in the central business, mixed-use, and selected planned development zones. The intent in having a small cap in residential zones is to focus on neighborhood preservation, quality of life, and housing preservation.Questionnaire #1: Rank your preference for where you believe short-term rentals should be permitted based on zone district:22389
77224599555871991768Traffic and ParkingTrash and Wildlife SafetyNeighborhood Impacts (ex: Noise, Crowding) Over TourismTax Fairness (Ex.: Property Tax Increases, Loss of Local HousingCompetition to Traditional Lodging in TownOther (please specify)GOOD NEIGHBOR POLICIESSTRS OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT COMPANIES SHOULD USE IN-UNIT MESSAGING ABOUT HOW GUESTS CAN BE GOOD NEIGHBORS AND SUPPORT COMMUNITY VALUES. 4HAVE ONE STANDARD SET OF GOOD NEIGHBORHOOD POLICIES THAT ALL STRS ABIDE BY. POLICIES WOULD INCLUDE RULES ABOUT NOISE, TRASH, WILDLIFE, PARKING, TRANSIT, ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP, AND RESPECT FOR THE COMMUNITY. 5WHEN VISITING ASPEN, RESPECTING AND EMBRACING OUR COMMUNITY CHARACTER, ETIQUETTE, AND UNIQUE MOUNTAIN STYLE IS WELCOMED, APPRECIATED, AND NON-NEGOTIABLE. 6In the first STR questionnaire hosted on Aspen Community Voice, more than 200 participants ranked their areas of greatest concern regarding STRs in Aspen. Loss of local housing was ranked #1, neighborhood impacts such as noise and crowding was ranked #2, and traffic and parking followed in closely at #3. The landscape of Aspen is changing, and it is a priority for our community to invest in maintaining our mountain views, small-town community character, and historical heritage. When visitors come to our area, the community appreciates when visitors invest in our community and embrace all that Aspen has to offer, our mountain town values, culture, and lifestyle. A group of technical advisors knowledgeable about best practices in lodging and STR industry, particularly in mountain towns, has met regularly with City of Aspen staff to discuss the future of STRs in Aspen. The group emphasized the need for good neighbor policies that all STR owners and renters abide by to solve for some of the nuisance complaints submitted by community members in regard to STRs. Those policies would also help visitors be a part of the community. For example, visitors often don’t know how important it is to lock their trash. In 2021, Aspen Police received more than 300 reports of bear OUTREACH SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS AND PARTICIPANT FEEDBACKTHEME KEY FINDINGSPARTICIPANT FEEDBACKNO.GREATEST AREAS OF CONCERN 5activity, mostly because bears were getting into trash or other food sources that weren’t properly stowed. This is a 20% increase from the year prior. The Aspen Police Department also responded to nearly 200 calls for disorderly conduct and harassment.In Salida, Colorado, STRs are only granted to ‘bona fide residents’ or their designated agents who are certified Chaffee County residents. A ‘bona fide resident’ means the applicant must show two of the following: a valid driver’s license or Colorado identification card, current voter registration, valid motor vehicle registration, or a document designating a primary residence for income tax purposes. The hope is that the concerns posed by STRs will be mitigated and neighborhoods and quality of life will be preserved since those operating businesses in Salida are those who live and invest in their local community.Questionnaire #1: Please check your three areas of greatest concern regarding short-term rentals in Aspen? (Other please specify):22490
INITIAL OUTREACH SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS AND PARTICIPANT FEEDBACKOPERATIONAL STANDARDS & ENFORCEMENTTHEME KEY FINDINGSPARTICIPANT FEEDBACKNO.ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF STR REGULATIONS IS NEEDED. 7RESIDENTS AND STR OPERATORS SUPPORT PENALTIES FOR FREQUENT VIOLATIONS OF REGULATIONS. 8STRS MUST HAVE QUALIFIED, LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF UNIT. 9The 245 participants who responded to the first STR questionnaire hosted on Aspen Community Voice provided more than 400 comments related to STR activity in Aspen. Nearly 10% of these comments and questions were related to enforcement, with some participants remarking that regulations without enforcement will be broken and the City’s current resources, specifically the Aspen Police, should focus on local needs rather than responding to nuisances from STR visitors. Further, those who do not adhere to established regulations should have their STR permit revoked. Noncompliance to STR regulations can lead to issues with responsiveness in emergency situations and a lack of clarity on the owner of the unit if nuisances occur during a visitors stay and a compliant is made. In Aspen, lodges generally have 24-hour, seven days per week, on-site management. STRs, however, are typically managed or rented by off-site entities including property management firms or real estate agents. The reduced availability of services and longer response times create burdens for service providers and increase the likelihood of safety and regulatory compliance issues from STRs. ADHERENCE TO REGULATIONS6OUTREACH SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS AND PARTICIPANT FEEDBACKPrior to the adoption of Santa, Fe, New Mexico’s current STR policy, 40% of STR owners were noncompliant with the previous policy. In the new policy, Santa Fe responded to these issues by adopting policy that requires STRs to have a local operator who can arrive at the rental within an hour to response to issues and daily fines against violations. The Town of Crested Butte, Colorado, has a full-time staff member dedicated to overseeing Crested Butte’s STR permitting process, financial compliance, and enforcement. Part of their enforcement includes revoking permits for STRs that are noncompliant and issuing liens on the properties until compliance is met.22591
LIFE SAFETYINCLUDE A PERMIT NUMBER AND LOCAL CONTACT OR OWNER REPRESENTATIVE IN STR LISTINGS, AS WELL AS POST THEM ON THE PROPERTY. 10STR OPERATORS AND OWNERS WANT TO COMPLY WITH LODGING APPROPRIATE LIFE-SAFETY STANDARDS. 11LIMIT UNIT OCCUPANCY. 12When asked in the first STR questionnaire hosted on Aspen Community Voice if the City should make a distinction between lodge (condo-hotel) properties and residential properties or units, participants stated that residential properties should primarily serve our local community and exist in residential districts for the wellbeing of our community and character. Since lodges operate under certain regulations and operational standards to monitor noise, wildlife, safety, service concerns, STRs should do the same. More people are coming to Aspen to visit. In a report provided by the Aspen Chamber Resort Association (ACRA), paid occupancy rose in the summer months (May-October) from 44.2% in 2020 to 65.6% in 2021. When asked in the first STR questionnaire hosted on Aspen Community Voice what respondents viewed as the greatest benefits to having short-term rentals in Aspen, more visitors in town was the least beneficial outcome. With more people comes more responsibility to keep our residents and visitors safe. Instituting occupancy restrictions can help manage the number of visitors coming to our community, as well as ensure proper safety measures are met for those who are visiting. Occupancy restrictions also reduce neighborhood nuisances and impacts from STRs. In Breckenridge, Colorado, occupancy restrictions are a key tool for managing STR impacts. There is a two person per bedroom occupancy limit and STRs cannot advertise for more than what the occupancy maximum is. Through the financial regulatory tool, LODGINGRevs, the City can enforce these restrictions. Under current regulations in Aspen, the requirements for lodges to ensure the safety of their guests, provide for a quality visitor experience, and contribute to Aspen’s efforts to facilitate a sustainable economy and maintain sustainable community infrastructure, are significantly more rigorous than those required of vacation rentals. For example, traditional lodges are required to mitigate for job generation and affordable housing, support transit systems, offer parking for all visitors, and meet higher building code life safety standards. INITIAL OUTREACH SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS AND PARTICIPANT FEEDBACKTHEME KEY FINDINGSPARTICIPANT FEEDBACKNO.THREE GREATEST BENEFITS OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS7OUTREACH SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS AND PARTICIPANT FEEDBACKEXPANDED AND DIVERSIFIED LODGING BED BASEREVENUE FOR PROPERTY OWNERSINCREASED TAX REVENUEINCREASED ECONOMIC ACTIVITYMORE VISITORSOTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)060801004020120140Questionnaire #1: What do you view the three greatest benefi ts of short-term rentals to be in Aspen?22692
PERMITTINGCREATE DIFFERENT PERMITS TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN DIFFERENT PROPERTY TYPES. 13COLLECT RELEVANT UNIT AND OWNER DATA ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS TO PROVIDE IMPORTANT DATA TO MARKET PARTICIPANTS, SUPPORT GREATER MARKET UNDERSTANDING, AND REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT. 14EXISTING PERMITS SHOULD BE GRANDFATHERED TO CURRENT PERMITTEES AND ATTRITION SHOULD BE USED TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PERMITS. 15When asked in the first STR questionnaire hosted on Aspen Community Voice if the City should make a distinction between owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied STRs and have different regulations for owner-occupied than for nonowner-occupied, 42% of 243 participants responded “yes”, while 58% of participants responded “no”. Per the City of Aspen’s Land Use Code, the use of STRs is allowable in all lodging, commercial, and residential zones. This is to say, there are few restrictions or regulations on where STRs can be located and no restrictions on the number allowed in the lodging, commercial, and residential zones. The number one way that mountain communities around the country are regulating STR operations is through a permitting system. Those in favor of instituting different regulations commented that non-owner-occupied STR permit holders tend not to be residents and are less invested in the wellbeing of the Aspen community. In addition, those who operate their homes as a business should be subject to the same regulations as a commercial lodge. Those against differentiating permits between non-owner-occupied and owner-occupied STRs expressed that property owners should be able to manage their properties without government oversight and subsize the cost of the property by renting it out for additional income. Further, regardless of regulations, respondents felt neither owner-occupied homes nor non-owner-occupied homes are likely to be affordable housing options for locals but do offer additional opportunities for tourism. Also, the distinction could affect the resale value of a property and be difficult to enforce. In the second STR questionnaire hosted on Aspen Community Voice, the City asked participants if they think it best to grandfather existing permits and use attrition to arrive at the capped limit of issued permits OR use a lottery to arrive at the capped limit. 61.2% of respondents chose attrition.OUTREACH SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS AND PARTICIPANT FEEDBACKTHEME KEY FINDINGSPARTICIPANT FEEDBACKNO.TYPES OF PERMITS AND ONGOING TRACKING8LOTTERY030025020015010050ATTRITION Questionnaire #2: Q1 - Do you think it best to grandfather existing permits and use attrition to arrive at the capped limit over time OR use a lottery to arrie at the capped limit?22793
OUTREACH SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS AND PARTICIPANT FEEDBACKFINANCIALSTHEME KEY FINDINGSPARTICIPANT FEEDBACKNO.ASSESS A PERMIT FEE THAT ALIGNS WITH STR PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION COSTS AND COMMUNITY IMPACTS. 16PREFERENCE FOR A TAX (WHICH IS SCALABLE PER UNIT) OVER AN IMPACT FEE (WHICH IS A SET COST). 17When asked in the second STR questionnaire hosted on Aspen Community Voice whether respondents thought that Aspen City Council should approve a new short-term rental specific tax to mitigate for community and environmental impacts, 60% of partcipants said “yes”.Prior to Santa Fe, New Mexico adjusting its STR regulations and tax structure, only 60% of its 1,444 active whole-unit STRs were registered with the City, which cost the City $1.6 million each year in missed revenue. On average, research demonstrated that the owners of STRs were making over $80,000 per host per year. Santa Fe has since instituted regulations and enforcement for STRs that are noncompliant, making them subject to a fine of $100 per day for a first violation, increasing up to $500 per day for further offenses. In Aspen, there are currently 1,246 registered STRs. Prior to the moratorium, STR permit holders were not required to pay a fee with their annual application. However, all lodges, including STRs, are subject to a 2% lodging tax that is used to support destination marketing (75%) and local transit services (25%). When asked in the second STR questionnaire hosted on Aspen Community Voice what community benefits could be supported by an STR tax, affordable housing rose to the top, followed by infrastructure and then the Climate Action Fund. SHORT-TERM RENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION9No40%60%YesAFFORDABLE HOUSINGINFRASTRUCTURECLIMATE ACTION FUNDEARLY CHILDHOOD COMMUNITY POLICINGOTHER02402001601208040Questionnaire #2: Q5 - Should Aspen City Council ask Aspen voters to approve a new short-term rental specifi c tax to mitigate for community and environmental impacts?Questionnaire #2: Q6 - If yes, what community benefi ts should the new tax revenue fund?22894
APPENDICES LISTINGAPP A STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS SUMMARYAPP B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP SUMMARYAPP C APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTSAPP D ACV QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2APP E STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW1213227422995
APPENDIX A: STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS SUMMARY1APPENDIX A STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS SUMMARYThe team interviewed residents, resident property owners, resident aff ordable housing occupants, property managers, real estate brokers, STR owners, former elected offi cials, lodge operators in Aspen and summarized key fi ndings below:I. KEY FINDINGSA. Positive Impacts• STRs diversify and expand the lodging bed base by off ering more unit sizes and diff erent product types than traditional lodging. STRs are off ered at diff erent price points, which makes Aspen available to more and diff erent visitors. • STRs provide income for property owners, supporting the economy. • STRs help locals stay in their house with supplemental income. B. Negative Impacts• STRs undermine community character and the sense of a lived-in community. • STRs have contributed to the movement of workers from the “public” service economy to the “private” service economy. • STRs have unmitigated impacts on community infrastructure and character, such as over-dependence on private vehicles taxing roads and parking capacity. • STRs do not suffi ciently mitigate their job generation and aff ordable housing demand. • STRs have reduced the availability of free market rental housing.C. Preferred Regulatory Options• Limit the over-all number in the community. • Treat STRs more like lodging than residential uses. • Assess and permit fee on STRs that is commensurate with their value and cost. • Help STR occupants be better visitors and reinforcing community culture and character. • Implement stronger life-safety and compliance regulations. • Take the speculation out of the real estate market by limiting the ability to short-term properties.23096
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP2APPENDIX B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPThe City of Aspen short-term rental staff team organized 12 community professional and citizen members who are subject experts or who personally have experience in short-term rentals. This working group of 12 met every other week for a total of fi ve meetings on data sharing, information gathering, and policy recommendations for the City’s short-term rental ordinance. Their time, feedback, community engagement with constituents, and input towards the policy drafting process has been essential to staff throughoutthe moratorium.I. TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP MEMBERS AND MEETING DATESDonnie Lee, Gant Aspen Tricia McIntyre, ALVR Wayne Stryker, Stryker BrownJoy Stryker, Stryker BrownValerie Forbes, Sotheby’s John Corcoran, Aspen Alps Michael Miracle, SkiCo Wendalin Whitman, Whitman PropertiesJoshua Landis Chuck Frias, Frias Properties Tracy Sutton, Aspen Signature PropertiesGinna Gordon, APDMeeting #1 Meeting #2 Meeting #3Meeting #4Meeting #52/17/223.3.223.17.223.28.224.28.22II. MEETING EXECUTIVE SUMMARIESA. Meeting #1 Summary• The fi rst meeting gave staff the opportunity to hear from the group what their personal interactions were with STRs to better understand the diff erent ways individuals or businesses work with STRs. Staff gained valuable knowledge on the economics of STRs and how some types of STRs may profi t or be fi nancially diff erent from others. Market functions and fi nances were a great topic of discussion, and it gave staff data around how homes with STRs market diff erently than those without and what those implications for the owner may be. The group decided to think about ‘what needs to be managed’ to help guide the conversation around the second meeting.B. Meeting #2 Summary• The second meeting focused on how zoning and permitting contribute towards STRs and how the regulation of both can help set better operating standards for the City. The group agreed that the ‘right number in the right zones makes sense’ and that having STRs in the core and in traditionally short-term rental buildings should be top priority when thinking about limitations to zoning. The priority for zoning was having the core and lodging/commerical zones have the majority of STRs and as one moves out from the core, have decreasing density and increased limitations of STRs. The group also focused heavily on ‘whose accountable’ and emphasizing the recommendation that a local owner or local managing group should be solely responsible for STRs in the community due to the unique community character that is Aspen. The group was asked to give their detailed opinions on how zoning and permitting can regulate the STR market for their homework.C. Meeting #3• Pete Strecker led the third meeting on accounting and fi nances. The group was asked their opinion on having fees and taxes. There was consensus that a tax, possibly in addition to a fee, made sense as there is scalability for a tax based on the size, number of beds, and number of nights a guest will stay in a STR. This has greater mitigation than a one-time-fee ‘for all’. The group thought that housing was a logical nexus to the tax question but also decided that turning STRs into long-term local housing will be viable. This discussion also brought up the need for a good neighbor policy that all STR owners and renters abide by that might help solve for some of the nuisance complaints by neighbors. Staff asked as homework ‘what are we solving for’D. Meeting #4• The fourth meeting focused on the question ‘if there are caps then what’. The group looked at the number of STRs broken out by zone, location and density and answered questions on how to fairly and equitably decease density and intensity of STRs. The group agreed that if there is a cap on STRs, grandfathering all existing permits and decreasing that number over time via attrition was the preferred method. The group also explored the idea of diff erent permit types based on the use of the STR. There was consensus on the ‘3-strikes and your out’ policy for STRs who violate code or who have three complaints on the property within a permit year. There was also discussion on data points the City should be collecting when re-doing the permitting process that can help clarify some questions around current STR use in Aspen.E. Meeting #5 • The fi fth meeting of the TAC focused on draft ordinance and guidelines. Staff looked to TAC for specifi c recommendations on how the caps by zones should be established, what should defi ne a qualifi ed owner’s representative, and their preference on how STRs are capped in residential zone districts. There was strong consensus on grandfathering in all permits and letting ‘natural attrition’ take over to help regulate the market, and then followed by non-transferable licenses. There was productive conversation and clarity on ‘who’ should be the property manager and who may qualify to be a representative of the property when applying for a STR permit. Specifi c questions and comments that came out of the work session that staff will apply to developing guidelines and the ordinance include: a recommendation for September 30 as renewal date rather than December, determining what’s the timeline for the ‘3 strikes and you’re out’, a HOA compliance document from the HOA president to ensure that STRs are allowed, having an occupancy of 2, confi rming that inspections will help with compliance, having a permit fee be assessed based on the number of bedrooms, determining if permit gets revoked does the owner get it back after a certain number of years or do they loose it indefi nitely.23197
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP3APPENDIX B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPI. STR TECHNICAL STAKEHOLDERS MEETING #1 A. AGENDA• Introductions• Background, Purpose, Objectives, Process • Industry DiscussionoHow do you interact with the STR market?oDescribe the industryoDescribe the economic ecosystemoWhat do regulators need to know that we don’t know?• STRs in AspenoHow does the local/regional STR market function? oAre there diff erences between in and out of town?oWhat share of real estate market activity is attributed to STRs?• Regulating STRsoDo STRs in Aspen require additional regulation and oversight?oIf no, why? If yes, in what ways?oWhat level of regulation is appropriate?oWhat would happen in the community if?• Wrap and Next StepsB. Meeting #1 Notes23298
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP4APPENDIX B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPI. STR TECHNICAL STAKEHOLDERS MEETING #2 A. AGENDA• Introductions• Summary of PurposeoCouncil directionoGoals for meeting #2oPrevious meeting summar• Council Work Session OverviewoSummary of staff presentation and Council direction• STRs in AspenoHow does the local/regional STR market function? oAre there diff erences between in and out of town?oWhat share of real estate market activity is attributed to STRs?• STRs in Aspen - PermittingoSummary of Council directionoGroup discussion of permitting optionsoGroup preferences for permitting23399
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP5APPENDIX B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPMEETING #2 NOTES234100
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP6APPENDIX B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPI. STR TECHNICAL STAKEHOLDERS MEETING #3 A. AGENDA• Introductions• Summary of PurposeoOutreach Updates - Open House Invite for April 6th 2022• Homework ReviewoSummary of comments received from members• Financial Discussion – Pete StreckeroCouncil’s thoughts on STR fi nancials oWhat Council has expressed interest inoStaff ’s actionsoQuestions to contemplate: oWhat do you think about taxes in the context of property zoning?oWhat do you think about both fees and taxes in the context of community impacts (aff ordable housing, transit, etc.)?oWhat do you think about a fee for the vacation rental permit? It is currently $0.oSome communities have done fee schedules based on bedroom counts – any thoughts around that?oSTRs remitted in 2021 data• Wrap and Next StepsB. Meeting #3 Homework Responses• STRs are a land use distinct from residential and lodge uses. Yet land use regulations do not make that distinction. This results in a variety of inequities and community impacts which our current system fails to address. I think it makes sense to create an additional tax on short term each rental that goes directly into a fund to work towards addressing the inequities and community impacts, whether it be employee housing or otherwise.• Aspen has not sought to mitigate the impacts of STRs on employee generation and other infrastructure and service demands. Same as above.• The community has not established review criteria to ensure basic health and safety standards for individual STRs, or to provide common expectations related to property management and guest behavior standards. Frias would of course support a more stringent review process by the City when applying for a permit to verify that each STR has a licensed and insured property manager available to assist the guests for emergencies or otherwise. We also support a standard fl yer that could be prepared by ACRA, the City, or both, that all STRs must provide to their guest and have in each rental unit. Perhaps education is the fi rst step prior to regulation when it comes to guest behavior.• The scale and rapid expansion of STRs are changing the nature of important aspects of neighborhood and community character in ways that we are just beginning to understand. It is clear that some STRs are operating as commercial uses in dedicated residential zone districts. This seems to fall into the conversation we have been having about certain restrictions for residential neighborhoods, such as the West End, but I do not think this pertains to the condo buildings that have always had STRs. I still think it would be interesting to learn about owner comments or concerns as it relates to STRs in residential neighborhoods and do a majority of these owners want restrictions?• STRs, particularly in multi-family developments, have accelerated a transition of many housing units that previously were owned or rented by working locals into de facto lodge units. The displacement of locals from these units over time is not a new trend, but STRs have brought a new scale and pace to this challenge. I think this is true, but I also don’t see this new ownership base renting to locals at aff ordable or even semi-aff ordable rates if they aren’t allowed to rent short term. When an owner sees how much money they can make renting short term or even seasonally long term, it no longer makes fi nancial sense to rent the unit to a local for 6 months or a year as that makes the unit unavailable for their own use. An owner may rent long term for July and August and then use the unit in June and September, which they could not do if it was rented to a local for 6-12 months. I honestly don’t know what to do about the displacement of locals from units that they rented in the past. I remember renting a very average unit at the Scandia on West Hopkins in 2012 for $2k/month and while I believe it is listed for sale now, the most recent advertised rental rate was $5,500/month because the market supports that even though the unit was not updated at all in the last 30 years.• In regards to transferring a valid STR license. Should it be transferred?• From one broker comment - I think this needs to be explored more not really thrilled with any of these options below.• A) Owner to Owner• Yes• B)With the property until the expiration date• (2 out of 4 responses said YES)• C) Tied forever with the propertyoYes• In regards to the price of the annual permit, the consultants will give us a range that will help cover the cost of the STR program administration by the city.• What would be an appropriate price of annual permit?• A)$150• (2 out of 4 responses said YES)• B)$150 + $50 per bedroomoYes• C)$500oYes• D)$1,000• E) A % based on the tax amount received in 2021 from the rental property• F) Another Amount ______________________• General comments from one broker on STRs are here:oAspen and Snowmass are resort communities that exist but for the grace of tourism. Limiting short term rentals limit the more aff ordable sector of our lodging pool, which personally I think is a shame. In terms of our rental business specifi cally, most of our rental listings prefer to rent for 30+ days, so limiting short term rentals there simply cuts the tax revenue that would have come in from the 7-10 day rentals that happen usually over the holidays, President’s Week or spring break. Originally, the STR permit was so the city could track how many beds were available in the community and to ensure compliance with lodging taxes. I have no problem with that. I also have no problem with cancelling permits for non-compliance or 235101
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP7APPENDIX B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP“nuisance” rental properties. However, dreating an artifi cial limit on permits will constrain supply and drive up prices, which seems incongruent with the city’s goals. It “feels good” to feel like you have control over your community, but care must be taken to remove the emotion and consider the consequences of any government action.• I think the problem statements outlined in the council memo adequately summarizes the LEO specifi c concerns. Additionally I wanted to fi ll you in on a recent encounter that the APD responded to. It is mainly just informational, but I wanted to highlight this your for awareness as you continue to aggregate an approach to STR units in the City.• A local Air BnB owner seems to bait and switch incoming visitors. They come expecting to stay in one unit, but for what ever reason that unit is not available when they arrive, so he off ers them another less appealing unit, renters are left to fend for themselves to fi nd another place to stay during busy seasons or accept his lesser unit. He does adjust the fee, but this practice is still shady for many reasons.• Additionally in this instance, Offi cers are more routinely called upon to be the enforcement arm for this property owner. Here is where it gets challenging. The owner has requested police escort a short term tenant off of his property. The tenant (or short-term renter) has some, although possibly limited rights, and any dispute about the lease or rental agreement is a civil issue. There are some distinctions, if the allegation is that the guests activity is breaking the law – we can investigate it the same way as any other crime – however, the end result will be either arrest or a ticket, the Police do not have authority to kick someone out of a short term rental. • All of this is a roundabout way of explaining that violation of a contract in these cases is a civil issue. The DA explained that short term rentals provide certain rights (evictions and such) that hotels don’t and to simplify it, we are the Aspen Police not the AirBnB Police.• Without any context, I have to say the heat maps suggesting limiting STR’s to a hundred per zone is very concerning. Our market is like other resort communities, but also totally diff erent. To go from 1000+ STRs to just a few hundred is way more extreme that we’ve seem to be talking about the fi rst 3 meetings.• It does appear the “non-transferrable” is a theme, and maybe that’s the case to get the city to a number their more comfortable with for STRs.• I fully support our discussions of rolling this out in phases. Phase I – educate, get the permitting system and fee in place, and cleaning up the actual STR numbers. Those that apply do so for rentals less than 30 days. Just from our rentals here at Sotheby’s, I know many are shooting for 30+ days, and we have a lot of long term rentals too, that currently have a permit. So cleaning up the program and language would be very helpful.• Just this week, I had an owner in Pitkin county, and they were approved an COA STR. This has since been corrected, but surprised that this far in the process, that they were approved in the fi rst place.• Thanks for all your hard work on this and I look forward to coming to an amendable solution for the fi rst phase. It would set an awful precedent to have all the time and feedback and then city council just go ahead and put the hammer down anyway.• You asked us to give our thoughts on what the problem is that the city trying to solve with the new STR regulations. Why does City Council think there is a problem in Aspen? Why has the pressure we all feel bubbled over and become palpable in the last couple years to the point that the newspapers are fi lled with opinion columns and letters to the editor about it almost daily? • I started a letter the night after our meeting two weeks ago but honestly I didn’t know where to start or stop and my heart got heavy and I put it aside. I spent the last two weeks asking my friends, family and acquaintances what they thought. • I feel like three main themes emerged. • Cultural Shift (also commonly described as “Aspen losing its soul” and more recently boiled down to “Aspen Sucks”)oThere has been a major culture shift and the people who live and work here no longer feel included in the joy and spirit of Aspen. The homeowners, visitors and full-time residents have changed. The homes being built and remodeled are not like homes twenty years ago. There are “smart” systems, air conditioning, heated year-round pools, hot tubs, snow melt, and every other luxury imaginable. The people who live in these homes have no tolerance for any level of discomfort or things not working. The end result is a lot of property management and service calls up and down the valley that did not used to exist. A few weeks ago I saw a listing in the Aspen Times classifi eds for a private home looking for a butler.oThe gradual change was accelerated in the last two years with the large amount of people who moved here full time and part time. Rising commercial rent and an infl ux in out of town restaurants opening Aspen locations and longtime restaurant owners taking the opportunity to retire, which resulted in what felt like a whirlwind of changes to local businesses, though this is not a new phenomenon: ohttps://www.aspendailynews.com/the-past-is-showing-our-future/article_6e758160-c728-59c9-bba7-0be21afdeaa0.htmloInexplicably one of the community’s largest stakeholders dumped gasoline on the smoldering class war being perpetuated by some, by choosing the worst time possible (if ever there was a good one) to explicitly divide us into insulting categories based on our net worth. ohttps://www.aspentimes.com/news/aspen-skiing-co-launches-a-new-luxury-division/oUnsurprisingly causing no shortage of backlash and general thoughts and introspection about the cultural shift (I won’t even get into the Gorsuch situation):ohttps://www.aspentimes.com/opinion/roger-marolt-aspen-sucks/ohttps://www.aspendailynews.com/opinion/parrott-if-you-can-t-duct-it/article_15766ed0-a655-11ec-9909-4f25bfbb828a.htmlohttps://www.aspendailynews.com/opinion/brandon-duct-tape-darlings/article_06a5d0c4-a599-11ec-ae49-6f18d5197337.htmlohttps://www.aspendailynews.com/opinion/whiting-vail-doesn-t-suck-anymore/article_68ac1eba-ab0a-11ec-8feb-47019c172dee.htmlo https://www.aspentimes.com/opinion/roger-marolt-learn-to-say-no-or-kiss-this-place-goodbye/oThe true spirit and joy of Aspen was that everyone, locals, both seasonal workers, ski bums, the local middle class and everyone in between, partied together, skied, ate, drank and played together with second homeowners and visitors. Cloud Nine used to be a fun place to have a fondue lunch. On-mountain picnic spots and parties that used to be free or impromptu now require reservations and cost hundreds or thousands of dollars to be a part of. Locals and visitors used to mingle at Little Annie’s and The Red Onion. Visitors and second homeowners used to want to hang out where the locals hung out. Restaurants knew that “hooking up” locals at the bar with some discounted food and drinks was good for business because the fun energy drew in visitors. The people who lived and worked here enjoyed interacting with our visitors and second homeowners. These days most locals just feel disgusted, excluded or simply uninterested in joining in the contrived excess and hope that the few remaining local gathering spots don’t disappear.• I’ll add an important sub-category here: More People oThere is a higher demand live in the valley there does not seem to be any limit to what people will pay to buy or rent homes. This is true from Aspen to Carbondale (and throughout Colorado and resort communities everywhere).oThis pretty much sums it up: https://www.aspentimes.com/news/236102
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP8APPENDIX B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPbasalt-mayor-says-urban-exodus-is-game-changer-for-towns-in-roaring-fork-valley/oThe truth is that many of the new full or part-time homeowners and guests are not here for the traditional Aspen spirit that used to attract people and draw them into the community. This culture shift is taking its toll on everyone. ohttps://www.aspentimes.com/news/new-marketing-plan-for-aspen-will-back-off -on-shoulder-seasons/o https://www.aspentimes.com/news/acra-midway-through-journey-to-destination-marketing-plan/oThe sacrifi ces we make to live here always seemed more than worth the gain of living in a beautiful and joyful place where most people got along most of the time. But many locals simply don’t feel like they can thrive and enjoy their town and the community anymore. • Lack of Aff ordable Housing. Not new, getting worse, no one can seem to agree on the solution. oIt has also become a more heated issue at the heart of the above mentioned “class war” narrative. o https://www.aspentimes.com/opinion/elizabeth-milias-aspen-vs-the-worker/ohttps://www.aspentimes.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor/high-brow-and-tone-deaf/o As a side note, and just based on people I know and anecdotal evidence, I think the real estate boom in Snowmass and Basalt probably has had more impact in terms of people losing housing than what’s happened in Aspen, that ship had, with a few exceptions, pretty much already sailed. • Questions about the Effi cacy of City RegulationsoInfi ll, penthouses, not enough pillows, more density, more aff ordable housing, Lift One Lodge, view planes, the art museum, vacancy tax, no more penthouses, too many rentals, too many people, not the right kind of people, Gorsuch Haus.ohttps://www.aspentimes.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor/aspen-council-not-all-there-with-vacancy-tax/ohttps://www.aspentimes.com/news/aspen-city-council-advances-aff ordable-housing-eff orts/ohttps://www.aspendailynews.com/council-passes-lodging-incentive-ordinance/article_c56f5939-72d1-53c9-89fb-bdae5527291d.htmlohttps://www.aspentimes.com/news/city-softens-infi ll-plan/ohttps://www.aspentimes.com/news/views-on-infi ll-all-about-views/ohttps://aspenjournalism.org/frame-by-frame-how-the-aspen-art-museum-was-approved-by-the-city/ohttps://www.aspentimes.com/news/aspen-councils-concerns-leave-lift-one-lodge-in-limbo/ohttps://www.aspentimes.com/news/hotel-boom-hasnt-off set-pillow-drain/oIt has been a long 20 years with a lot of changes. It is easy to look back and criticize when things backfi red, had unintended consequences or just fl at out didn’t work. My very off the top-of-my-head list is not a fair or exhaustive summary nor in historical order and it does not acknowledge positive things that happened along the way, but when you talk to someone who has been around for long enough it just feels like we bounce from shore to shore like a rudderless ship, reacting to the issue of the day, losing a piece of our collective soul every step of the way. I hope that this process and all of the work and community involvement will go beyond the individual matters at hand and help the city and community fi nd our North Star. oI appreciate your time and energy on this issue and the bigger issue of doing what is best for our city and our community. Public service is not for the faint hearted, I know your job is not easy and you and your team will be criticized no matter what you do. You have my thanks any my support and hope that we can all move forward together.II. STR TECHNICAL STAKEHOLDERS MEETING #4 A. AGENDA• Introductions• UpdatesoOpen house April 6th 4-6 @ Pearl PassoWork Session April 11th 4pm @ Council ChambersoPre-review Council work product• Discussion from last meetingo“Problem we are solving for”• PermittingoDiscussion of how to manage the permit system with limited supplyoEligibility, Lotteries, Transferability, Caps, NoticingoProcess for diff erent permit types: condo, owner-occupied, non-owner occupied• Wrap and Next Steps237103
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP9APPENDIX B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPI. STR TECHNICAL STAKEHOLDERS MEETING #5 A. AGENDA• Introductions• Caps By Zone Districto Review of Data and MapsoThoughts on Cap Percentages by Zone District• Ordinance and Program Guidelines - Topics of consideration:oQualifi ed owner’s representativeoGrandfather v. Lottery oDetails of permit application content• Wrap Up and Next StepsB. Meeting #5 Ideas on Ordinance and Guidelines• Is is possible that we could incorporate the zone in the permit number? Ex R6100 Might help or hurt the cap per zone idea. I mean in the actual permit license number Example Bob Jones – 100 Aspen Way – His license number would be R6-089703 (identify the zone in the permit license number).• Thank you for the detailed report. I have reviewed it and have the following concerns and comments. I promise I am not trying to be sassy. I am completely blown away as the suggestions of who are the representatives. Also, I will be handing you the keys to my business if this goes through as written. Corporate Monsters like Sotheby’s are swallowing me whole as we speak. In fact, it is mere website for leads and reservationist. • A Rental Agency is the following: A property management company that has the following. 1.) Strict contracts with the owner to manage their calendar, give expert advice as to the rates, use a modern reservation system to store data and give data and pay taxes, on call 24-7 Maintenance person who knows how to fi x anything, pre-arrival guest services, a front desk to ask questions, concierge services to assist in the pre-arrival planned of rental cars, taxis, grocery shopping etc., and is responsible for all aspects of the property as a full-service business. A lack of a better word, Hotel. There are professional policies, staff , and procedures in place to protect the guest, the property, and the community around them. This costs money, education and is a real commitment to the business of STR’s. Real Estate Companies have none of this nor are they willing or will ever put a penny into it because they don’t want to be known as a Rental Agency they want to be know as a Real Estate Company. They have had (10) years to do so and have done nothing. 2.) You do not need a License to be a property manager. Also, you do not need a license of any kind to do short term rentals. This will change over time but right now this is what we are working with. Continued...I read in the paper today that the following would be a qualifi ed representative: A license real estate broker – why not say Plumber or Attorney here? As Plumbers – Realtors have absolutely no business doing STR’s especially in a Resort environment. Please explain to me why they are even on this list? True Rental agencies do not do RE SALES, so they are not a threat to Realtors. Realtors can still book properties (Frias-I trip – SAS ) with the PM and get their commission. The Russian Oligarchs and the bookkeeper somewhere else are working with Real Estate Brokers! There are no rules here. AIRBNB is more accountable than Realtors as the owners must be. To be on the platform there are rules, requirements, and protocols in place. They have a system of vetting the guest, vetting the owner and have a review section to voice any complaints. AIRBNBs are being managed by boots on the ground they must be, and they must be trained or the whole thing falls apart. Real Estate companies have none of the above. After a sale, the company gives the rentals to a broker who is new to the business or one broker - a one man show and they 100% cater to the owners. The contracts are written as I mentioned before which states the broker could set the house on fi re and would not be liable anything, so whatever accountability we think they have – they don’t. They have contracts with the owner that not worth the paper they are written on. Real Estate companies don’t have a reservation system (MLS is not a reservation system and they all know it) or have a handle on rates. They pull pie in the sky rates ( they have no technology behind anything) and availability and then (here it comes) check with the owner to see if those dates are available and the rates are ok AFTER they have already presented it to the guest. This is unethical. But they won’t get in trouble because they are not overseen by ABOR or the CDOR. Then they add a service fee to the reservation of 3% to 7% - for what? Absolutely nothing. Pocket change for their welcome baskets that they order from AMEN WARDY. They add no value to the STR business , in fact they are the cause of the BLACK HOLE. They will do whatever the Russian Oligarch wants, where a professional will force them to honor their rates and their availability or there will be fi nancial (big fi nancial consequences). Brokers do not put these kinds of restriction on because they don’t want to lose the relationship with the owners – ever. This is a tragedy. Wait until every STR is Listed and marketed (NOT MANAGED) because that is NOT what they do – they LIST and Market only with realtors, because that is what is happening right now. You have 400 or more properties managed by 100 or more diff erent brokers who have their ideas of what an STR is. Well, it is a mess. There are lawsuits. You won’t see them in the paper because they are settled out of court because the Russian Oligarch’s don’t want their name in the paper. Giving this power to Licensed Real Estate brokers is the biggest mistake – they have no reservation system – so no data (everything is on an EXCEL Spreadsheet), no protocols, no training, no requirements for the owner to deliver the product in a truthful manner, educate the guests on anything.. I could go on and on. Real Estate Brokers are the “bad actors” in all of this. I am shocked. I would prefer you put down elementary school teachers here as they would do a better job and have more compassion for the guests. Frias, Alpine Properties, Sky Run, Itrips, McCartney properties, North of Nell, The Gant or the condo-tels are professional Rental agencies. They put the time and money into it. They have all the tools in place to be a legit business that caters to the guest and make the owners income. They are all local. Believe it or not “out of town companies” don’t really exist here because the brokers will not work with them because they don’t want to lose control of the real estate asset. True Rental Agencies make the owners honor the availability, honor the rates, honor the guest with the correct insurance, maintenance and cleaning that is required to be even close to being fair on what we are charging these poor people. How did the realtors get to you? If you took them out of the equation, there would be a more organized STR business’ and all the issues you are trying to combat would be solved. I can 100% guarantee it. I would ask Joshua Landis how he feels as a realtor and realtors doing STR’s- he will be honest. • I’d like to commend you on your work so far. Although I have missed the past couple of meetings, I’ve been paying attention and watching council meetings, etc. This is a complicated task and many of my own positions and opinions have evolved throughout this process, interactions with group members, etc. I plan to join you at 2:00 today but wanted to send over of few of my thoughts and opinions ahead of time. 1. I like the idea of grandfathering with attrition and I’m happy to learn that you don’t plan to make STR permits transferable if you are going to put a limit on the number issued. It sounds like those who purchase a condo or TH in the downtown core that currently allows STR by Declaration will generally be allowed to get a permit without a waitlist - I think that’s great too. 2. I’m happy that you are addressing who is managing the STR’s for property owners. I’d like to learn more about what constitutes a “qualifi ed” owner’s rep. and how they will be allowed to market a property. A licensed Realtor typically markets through the MLS and the Broker to Broker network while a “professional AirBnb host” / property manager utilizes the online, consumer to consumer platforms. If a Realtor causes problems for owners, neighbors, etc.. they can be held accountable through their brokerages, DORA, ethics boards, etc... The same is not true for professional hosts / property managers. How will they be regulated? I think it’s great that you are requiring the property owner to hold the permit in their own name and pay their own taxes rather than allow these management companies to control the permits for absentee / investor owners. This will hold the owners more accountable for the actions of their managers and tenants. The online platforms are powerful tools that are designed to be used in a consumer to consumer way. The 238104
APPENDIX B: TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP10APPENDIX B TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPgame changer in Aspen seems to be the use of the Consumer to Consumer platforms in a Business to Consumer way. Some of these professional hosts do a great job at maximizing revenue because they have learned how to optimize these online platforms. This has led to national corporations and/ or new residents with little connection to the Aspen community maximizing profi ts for absentee investors. There is no doubt that these professional host have created a better business model and they often do a much better job than the realtors because they have the benefi t of the online platforms. 3. I would suggest only allowing renters in the number of 2 per bedroom plus 1 (at least in a small condo). Some of the problem that I have encountered as the head of my association have been caused by owners packing 4 adult guests in to a small 1 BR unit (440 ft.2) with only one bathroom and sensitive plumbing. This creates much higher occupancy than intended in a small complex and many of the utility bills are shared. 2 per BR seems to be a common standard in multi family. Perhaps you could allow more in larger condos where it may be appropriate. And perhaps allow an exception for immediate family (2 adults with up to two children). https://www.wmfha.org/news/occupancy-standard-of-2-persons-per-bedroom-challenged4. As part of the permit process and management selection for a condo, I think it would be a good idea to require a “sign off ” from the home owners association just as someone would for a building permit. I’ve seen some of these outside managers refuse to provide the building rules to tenants as required and refuse to work in harmony with the association. While this can and should be handled at the association level, it would go a long way toward alleviating management problems if all rental managers were required read the governing documents and emergency protocols of the association and agree that all tenants will be provided with a copy of the rules and regulations of the building. If there are any emergency situations in a condo, common elements and neighbors will likely be aff ected, and it is critical that that rental manager have a relationship with the association manager and the HOA board and that they know who to contact to represent the association in the case of an emergency. • I’m sure you will want to confi rm all of this but I spoke with the fi re marshal today to see if there was a limitation on the number residents that could occupy a small rental unit. As I mentioned, I’ve seen an airbnb host marketing a 440 square foot 1BR for up to 4 occupants. Common sense makes this type of density seem inappropriate, and the neighbors have been complaining about the level of impact caused as a result of having this many residents in a tiny 1/1 condo, which barely seems to accommodate 2 residents comfortably. In this case, the 2 per bedroom +2 formula seems like it would not work. The fi re code and IBC code seem to say the same.• Please reference the table in section 1004.1.2 that shows that for “business residential use” the limitation would be 200 gross square foot per resident. That would make 440 ft2 appropriate only for 2ppl.Perhaps 2 plus one child could work, but it seems that an owner could only market this property to a party of 2, not a party of 4. This may or may not hold true for a residence, but since a STR is licensed as a business, the fi re marshall believes that this code limit would apply. • Great. More people may be appropriate if a unit is larger. I think it would be important to clarify that a 1br or studio under 600 ft. could only be MARKETED to parties of 2, but a third (overnight guest or additional family member) may not be a violation. Same for a 2br under 1,000 ft as 5ppl under 1000 may be a fi re code violation. They probably should not be marketed to 3 and 5 - only to 2 and 4.IMHO I think we should specifi cally state that we do have sidewalks in Aspen - so no one should walk in the middle of a traffi c lane while talking on their phone. • If I understand the reduction of STR permits for consideration by council correctly then I prefer council to consider permit reduction through attrition with a goal for a cap rather than a permit reduction by percentages. I do realize that is not the direction council has voiced. If they choose reduction by percentages I suggest they will start with 75% as a pilot program to see how it goes. In time they can always reduce by more but it would be diffi cult to go the other direction.ACRA’S ‘GOOD NEIGHBOR GUIDE’: At a glance it seems good. Perhaps in referring to “black bears” a comment should be made that refers to the type of bear in this area not their color as we know they can be black, brown, beige etc. Minor detail.I learned to ski wearing jeans and duck tape on the toes of my Lange ski boots. Not to sound like a Karen but I would prefer the last sentence suggested not to wear a microwave one piece. Thank you and your fellow staff members for all the research, time, eff orts, drafts, teeth mashing etc that takes place to achieve a workable solution. I hope you can get to Moab when this is all over.239105
APPENDIX C: ABOR AND ACRA MEETING NOTES11APPENDIX C ABOR AND ACRA MEETING NOTESI. AGENDA• Presentation of Issues • Discussions with Council to Date • Overview of Research - Comparable Communities • Response to Questions for Council on 4/11 • Addition of Questions and Discussions II. PRESENTATION AND REVIEW OF MATERIALS• Looked at 12 diff erent mountain west communities • What are common themes/practices that work well III. 6 MAIN TOPICS - BEST PRACTICES• Life Safety oNeed building inspection oPublic notice of new permits oDisplay of permit #s oGood Neighbor guidelines, standardized • Permitting oDistinguish the diff erence b/w nonexempt & exempt STRs oDiff erentiating lodges vs. residential etc. oOwner occupied oNon-owner occupied oCondo-hotel oCreating a primary resident STR permit oOne year cooling period oAny new purchase has to wait one year before applying for STR oCap vs Attrition oNon-transferable licenses oUnlimited Licenses vs Primary Residence License • Operational Standards oOccupancy restrictions oSTR Holders must have representative who is able to be reached 24/7, and within 2 hour reach oSet diff . max. caps for diff erent permit types oLive & public document of all STRs & waitlist oLive waitlist, queue check • Enforcement oA dedicated full time employee for enforcement oIssuing Liens on non-compliant properties o“3-strike” complaint rule o3 strikes in one year, loose license for 5 years oHaving conversations up front oCity being more transparent • Financials oOccupational Lodging tax oApplies to STR & hotels oProve STR owners are remitting lodging tax oStandard for renewal of permit oTax spreads better across price ranges oTax has to be brought to public vote oCharging an annual fee on each STR bedroom oBenefi ts local housing programs oPer room per night fee is not recommended • Zoning oCreating Buff ers oWorked better than a cap, GWS used 250ft buff er oResidential Restrictions oSome towns restrict STRs in residential oConsider limiting STRs w/in multi-family units oR/MF is not being used as designed oMunicipalities use % Ratio oZone specifi c % ratios for limiting STRs IV. MEETING NOTES• Permit types is supported, helps to identify STR types • Helps support all types of STR rentals • Big goal should be information collection • Good neighbor laws could control the “loosing neighborhood” feel • Guest vs. paid guests isn’t a big diff erence • West end etc isn’t truly occupied full time anyway • STR is diff erent use than long term use • Reality is that owner occupancy is up • Feedback is happening because neighborhoods are not empty anymore 240106
APPENDIX C: ABOR AND ACRA MEETING NOTES12APPENDIX C ABOR AND ACRA MEETING NOTES• Owner occupancy of second homes is upping the stretching of city resources • Community has gotten bigger, can’t shrink it • How do we defi ne property rights, regulation makes sense, not prohibit people’s property use • Local representation, local enforcement, solves a lot of problems • Good neighbor policy is a great addition, should solve a lot issues • Think about layers of regulation, more than 1 person to call for emergencies • Whatever is set up will be trial and error, make practical decisions • Do not want to see # or % restrictions • STR should be transferrable by property • Already used to rules, activity usage. Only if not renewed is STR lost. • Lottery makes it hard to plan year over year • Will not address neighborhood concerns • Attrition is better limiting factor • Should have clear objective of long term goal • What problem are we trying to solve? • Aspen is a little bit behind the times when it comes to STRs • Add regulation, management, oversite to STR • Occupancy regulations • Council does not seem to be listening, not seeing council representation at open houses etc. • Data driven regulation vs. limitation. Pro regulation now, limitation later based on data • The decisions made here aff ect the whole valley. Non-constituents livelihoods based on what happens in Aspen. Community diff erent then voters • HOAs already do STR limitation. • HOAs must give approval for STR permit • City has good count of what is being rented out • Not a good tally of occupation/pillows etc. • Real Estate community contribute to metrics for monthly reporting - Destimetrics • Willing to do it if it will help greater community • What do we do with data? • Great data to have for all versions of rentals • Long-term vs short-term rentals • Better report metrics for week by week capacity totals • Fees/taxes not very limiting as a regulation tool • Layered approach to regulation • Permitting is not an issue: capping days, permit amount etc will be an issue. • Need to be able to rent houses, not just lodges/hotels • With increase in STR, is stretching capacity beyond community ability to handle. Peak is increasing, council is aware of this. • Demand will not decrease • Need to decide what the point/goal is. • Additional Questions and Discussion • Enforcing display of permit #s and ability to remove fraudulent listings • Enforcement trip is city code • Point of contact for each residence, local, in valley. • One year cooling could present tax issues with people who buy and sell property • Tax fee is preferred over per night per bed fee • Financial incentive for long term rentals could potentially work for smaller condos/homes • Enough of an incentive to change it from STR to long term • Might be more viable the building new employee housing • Could increase tax to fund a program to manage an incentive program • Could help contribute to solving housing issues • Multi-family limits could cause lots of issues • Not all locations got a lodge overlay • Multi-family is more dense near the core, better for visitors not as great for long term residents • Very complicated zone to regulate • Current STR are 16% roughly • Stuff the core, smaller percentage in the outer zone districts • 16% is not high, why is there a problem? • Most of the neighborhoods are only around 8% • Could be slightly higher if no moratorium • Market changes could aff ect % • STRs are not transferrable from one owner to the next, reduction via attrition • Other options include lottery system 241107
13APPENDIX D: APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTSCommunity Development staff hosted an Open House from 4-6pm on April 6, 2022, to offer the opportunity to the community to engage with technical experts around the topic of STR activity in Aspen now and into the future. The goal was to facilitate an understanding of the engagement process and the direction of the project, as well as collect input to present to Council to help in the decision-making process. More than 70 participants attended the Open House, engaged in conversation, and responded to questions highlighted on display boards throughout the room. Each display board question was introduced with background data and summaries to give content to the questions. While the data collected on the display boards during the event is not considered to be an accurate representation due to some attendees taking the liberty to “double-dot”, the feedback is essential to consider for the success of the development of regulations for short-term rentals. Comments made by attendees were also collected and transcribed into this report for further reference. 242108
APPENDIX D: APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS14APPENDIX D APRIL 6 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS243109
APPENDIX D: APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS15APPENDIX D APRIL 6 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS244110
APPENDIX D: APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS16APPENDIX D APRIL 6 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS245111
APPENDIX D: APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS17APPENDIX D APRIL 6 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS246112
APPENDIX D: APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS18APPENDIX D APRIL 6 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS247113
APPENDIX D: APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS19APPENDIX D APRIL 6 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS248114
APPENDIX D: APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS20APPENDIX D APRIL 6 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS249115
APPENDIX D: APRIL 6, 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS21APPENDIX D APRIL 6 2022 OPEN HOUSE POSTERS AND RESULTS250116
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #222APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2
! "
#$ %
& #$## "' &()
#
8
!"" #$ %%$& '( "$&) $* )11 " '' ) 3329 * :&5 8 : ; : %
:5 ; : ) 68 :
:< + : 1 ; + ; : + :< : ; : ':
$ 33/=4>?=>?
$ %%$& '( "$&) $*')% , " '' ) 33/
6 :5: 6 :
$ " 6 : :: : $ @ "
* :%< * :' * * :,
A * ; : = ** :?
$ /3
=
49>?=>?
$ %%$& '( "$&) $+0 '' )
B3
: *
$
B3
* 8251117
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #223APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2
! "
#$ % & #$## *#+
,
-
,
.
/ 0-
-
1 2
2 / *$ 344/%56 3!/756 3!/756839/956%3#/!56! 3 /%56# 3$/856# 3$/856 3$/!56 3$/!56 3$/!56 3$/!56 3$/!56 3$/!56 3$/!56 3$/!56 3$/!56 3$/!56 3$/!56 !" #$%% & '(% ' %) !" &*+,- %!) $ . !" &*/, 0&1. 1/ 2$%% 3.4.4 ,)% '1) 5 . 6%% 74&'1.% 1.1'*8)% 9 &' 2) # 5. '% 3,% '1%%$) *1&0 #$%% &+
! "
#$ % & #$###*#252118
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #224APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2+#&2 3$/!564 3#/*568* 39%/956*4 39*/%567 3#$/856 ) ) 5 + '51.+*5&.+ * & :+
! "
#$ % & #$##9*#+9:
$8 3!!/%56 9! 377/!56;%<"%+
! "
#$ % & #$##!*#253119
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #225APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2 #=
! "
#$ % & #$##7*#+ & ' - &
2
-
&
1
. ' .
;
1
< --
2
-
-/// $9 3!#/!56 !$ 374/%56= +
! "
#$ % & #$##%*#254120
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #226APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)'>'4>'.''.
* ;(8 $)8 ! $) $ ?$$ 8""$ , % $)$"@$"$-$ /$$"A8 " )8)'>' >'.''.4
.4;"!8 " )8)'>' >'.''.'
' ; , 8%%$ , /%) , ") ! 8""$ B/$8B 8% 8A /$,$%$ %$!$/ /% 8"$ ) / A " A $/ ""A8 " )8)1>.&>'.''
1 ;% $ ,8"$ 8"")$ !+88$)$A /$ ) $ % $"8$ 8$CD%$ %$A !+88$)% %! ,$) !/ !+88$)% % 88$%%)A8 " )8)1>.&>'.''.
. ;, % )$8 $ / $) 88$) %$/%
)) / ) @ $8" , /$ $ " )$) ,!/ /)%"%8%AAA /)!,?8$%8 " )8)1>. >'.''.*
4 ; !+88$) /+"% ,$ / ,$" @ ) $%,% /"!!/)$8%%A / %%!%>$" !8%$" 8$ ))8$!/$% / $ !)E ) %8%@ ) ), $8 " "$8>""@ )8$$ ) % B$8B $) F+)!/ 8/ $ %) $ 8D%$ .1 +@+))@8/ + / B! $%% )B $8$% % $$A ,$ %%!) $$)$%- / /%) , )%$G,$ )D$) "$$ /$$"8A8 " )8)1>.4>'.'' '
.*;H8%$) %$$ 8"$8%% $ @$"%% ! " ,)% ) / @ $8" "!/+"% /$/"8/A 8/ %8%$) $% "$$$ 8""$ ) ) $ A(8 $!/ , % % $ " $// /+"% $)$ 8A+#=
! "
#$ % & #$##4*#8 " )8)1>.4>'.''.*
* ;%%$"$)!/ 88$%% /$/" $%% 8$, / $%$ / $/,/) ) / 88$ / /$/,A / $"8 / $/,/) $ %!A 2$ // $ %!) $ 8"%% )$ " ,$$ 8 " " $$!$/ 88$ /$/,/) ) 8!///$$ ) $8 $)$,$ /$) ) /"A % )$%8 "$% /8%) , %$$ $ / %% $" ,$%)$ 88$ /8""$A8 " )8)1>. >'.''.5
&5 ; " / , %8 /)! ,$)$-/$$)$8%% @$ "!$/ /"% / , $A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.&
* ; $ ,$ ,$ / / $% / /)%) ) / " ) 8) ) /" / $$!%) / %8 A /$,%"!$/ / 8 $A / 2% $)8%$!$/ / /"%$)A %C,%% )!/$%C!%% $8 /" 8">$$%$G / /$ ) A(/ ,$ 8$ $$ !/ ) " / %8%8"!/$8/ /% "%!G8A0)C ) "%$A! "$/ ) %%$ / /% $)$/% / $% )A / ,) %G) / 8A0$/ %% / )% ) %8%% ,)$ / /% $) !/ /$G, )%$!/ 8 , )%) , / 8$ I8 " )8)1> .>'.''.
& ;!!$%% /" /$$/,$/) 8)8 A8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
&& ;!88$) 8%% ) $" $ / 8""$ /%%)$ / " ) / ) 8$,$ / 8""$A8 " )8)1> >'.'' '
.5; $) , / % %GD$8G$ !$/ $$ $ /8""$ + "G$ )$$8$ 8%) $% ) !$/ / ! !/ ,) %$ %!G% $ / "%$G%!C $ // , / !/C $$$A8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.
. ;/ !88$)%!%) , % $,% !G$%8%A / !88$)% $%% 8%) , %8%!G/$A
! "
#$ % & #$##8*#255121
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #227APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1> >'.'' '
' ;!88$) ,$ / 8""$A ,%$ //" 8 / $ 88$) $"$% , $)%$"$ / $"8 /% %$G$8 $ $/,/) )$) , %8% % // /A$)8 / !88$) ) %%!G /%%! / % $/,/)A8 " )8)1> >'.''.'
1& ;" !+88$) )) / " $8"A8 " )8)1> >'.''.1
.5; )C/$G/ ) , )$%$ $% ,/ /%) , 8 8/ A %!/ %$ /" / "/ / " %$G% "$)$/ 8""$ ) / "G!%) , +8$$8$ 8/ !$%)%$ $8$ )8$ $%A !%), " 88$ / / $ /% +)A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.5
. ;!!/ /"% %$ /" / "/ / %% / " 88$ / 8""$ ) "G$$ $ 8/88 " )8)1> 5>'.''.
&' ;/ )$$8$ $!//>- $ $"$%$)$% ,$A %%!$ ,$E!+88$)F$ $)$% 8 /$ )$)$ / $ " % $ ) $8A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.1
&1 ;!+88$) C " / % $"8 /$)$ $/,/) $ / %) )$8%%A !+88$) C 8 , %$G "$$ /% !/$8/ $ $)$% $/,/) $A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.&
.; !+88$) /" ) , $)$$) ) / ,%$8) G!!/ / % / G) //$ "GA % %$G%% % 8"$ ) /,$ ! $ ) /G ) / /$ "G )$ ) $) ,8/$ / $ )$ ) %$ /" )/"G$ $ B$"$,%B %8% $% % "$%$ )$ %$ ) , / 8""$ / /!G$ " / %$) $ %% /$%$ ) 8A /B)B "
! "
#$ % & #$##**#" /% 8"$ % ) /,$ !!/ // / 8%) G ) /$%%!8$$- )$ / )"$8 ) /% "G " %!/ ) /$ $ )$$A /$)8$%8$ / , ) )% $)%$ )%$) , $ %8 $"")$%A /%) , 8$" )!// / )A $ $ %% $" $"$)8 / %$ $ % "/ / / $ /%) ,8$)) % ) ) 8/A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.&
'* ;<" % @$8 /!$) / +!88$)/+" ) / / "8 ) 8 / / $!A% /$%8""$!/ % $ $/,/) ,$%)$ $!)A %$ $ 8) ,$%)$!$/ $ )8% / $ /"% +!/$8/ ) ,%$ / "$ $%8%% /"A 8% " /$) $ / / , $% % $ / $/!/$8/%) $ 8%% / %$8 8%" /" )!A / 8)) $$/ !)$ /!,8 ) ))") / / ,A !/$8 $%) )G%$ /" % $/ %G$ %)% ) ,D% $$ $/!/$8/%) $ % %%$ ) %""$ )A/$ / %% /)!$/$ / '!GA /$ $ )$$ / % / "$)8!/ %$ )!G/A0 / "$%$ ) ?, G8) $ %% $/A C 8$ A %$ / )$$%, $% $"8) , / %$$ /"%A8 " )8)1>'.>'.''.1
& ;2) !/ " , +!88$)A 6 "$"$)8E$$ 8) /" ,$ !/$ $% ,$% ) /">%I2)$8 ,! B/"B , $ $"8))/">8$% B,$BA / %/ $$$8 $"8 $/,/) /%) , "$) $$)$%- ) $%%!) /%) ,%) > "$$ $"8 %$G /%A 8)"$$" $ "$@) >$)$%-! %! $)) , ) /" ,$A )"$$" /"%$G%)8%$) )"$8%%$8"% .>4.C )%" , $ !$8$ ) #()"G 8/A %$>"$$$ / /"% /%)8/A " % 88)!$/ /$/ >/$/$8$%$-$ /" $$)$%-A8 " )8)/ J!88$)% 8 $ ) /
! "
#$ % & #$## $*#256122
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #228APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #21>'.>'.''.
*& ;$)A %$!$%% /%% )% " ,$ /% %8%A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.'
'' ;!88$) / 8$, 8""$A88$% KGA !88$) " ,$" $A / %% )K8$,8""$ ) )8 " / $/,/)A % %% $) $ $ $/,/)!$/ 8A8 " )8)1>''>'.''.'
.&;(8 $" $ /!"%!/ 8)$ )$8) ) $%% $ $" /",8 " )8)1>''>'.''.
&5 ;) 8""$ A 8$% 8$ /%A8 " )8)1>''>'.''.4
&* ; /8$ $ $)$$)% )C8//">$ /% $A0%) / /$,%/$ /)) %8% / %8 %$A /$$ % %$G% /!$/ !88$)% % /$$8$ ) 8A0)" /$ "%A8 " )8)1>''>'.''.4
&* ; "$ /%)K8% / /$ "G /!/$8/ $!/!%) / $ /$)$$8$A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.4
'1 ;!" 88) / ) / 8""$ ) ? $ "G "8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.
5 ; !88$)$)8 % %,% / )8""$A / G8 ,) / 8""$ , % " %A / % "G ),% %$$ $ % %$G%A/ "$/!%/ $) 8" /$ ,$ / % $ /$8$$- /! , $$% $,$ 8""$ "", %$ /A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''
.';!88$) /" $,)/!G>$A!/ %$ /" $ $! /% /$,%" $ A8 " )8) ,)$/,/) ! /%) )8 /"A
! "
#$ % & #$## *#1>'1>'.'' '
. ;" "88)!$/ /"!!/ $8" "$$ /$/"E) "G $ $,% /" G $F/%!/ ! /" $" $ %A8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
1* ;0 " ) / 8/$ /" %% / $ /" $ %% $" /"% $8"$A % $) / " ,$%$ /"/$$ , $ ! $ %% $" "% $8/$ !/ , / $ @ ,$ ) %8$$ %A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.*
*' ;!88$) %%) ,8 / !$ /%) / 88$,% ) 8"%$!$/ 8$%$ 8A %$ "%$G%,)/) , /!/ / !$ A @ 8%%8) ) $)!// !/ 8% / 888A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.
* ;K%)A %8% !$ /$)!%%$!/$%/K!'"/8$$/"8"/ / "%$% /%)$ / G$ %%$ %$!/ / $" $$/A 2!8!/ )!%%$8 1G! "/ / , )/ "$)%$ 8"!$/ "%$% /%)$$ '.G!GI8 " )8)1>'*>'.'' '
& ; ) , )$$ ) $"A K/$$ !$ !/$% !A K/$ ?$ "G " 8/!$/ $"A8 " )8)1>'*>'.'' '
& ;= !/%)$$$-! %$$ $ /$$A8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.
* ; !88$) $ )% $% "%8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.
& ;,8 / / G$%$ /A8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.
.1;!!/ $)8 ,$ /%) , 8"%% ) L/! / /%) , ,?8 / " @ )%$ / /% A
! "
#$ % & #$## #*#257123
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #229APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1>' >'.'' '
*& ;!+88$) /"!C$) % " /$ %8% / /%)C,$8) )$ /"%!/ /C $ $A )C/$G/ +!+88$) /" /%) ,$8) $/, $ " %$G / ! 88A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.
* ;(8 $ " +!88$) %8 ,8" /"/!$%% , /$ % ),% % "%A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.'
&' ;8G$ /!/" $%$-) ) ,$$A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.&
.1;!88$) $ $%% /"/8$,$ / %8%8""$ ) 8"A 8" "% /% ") @ %$$ /!/$8/ "$" 8K , "!$/"% $8"A 8) /" ! )$ $ $") ,$ /$$"$)8 / $ ?) ,$ ,% "G " "/$ $"$%A%%%8% / " 8/) /$$)8!/$8/!%) %, 8$)) /"% , $K 8%% ,$8$% ,8 $ ,) % %$G %!G8 " )8)1>' >'.''.&
' ;!88$)!$%% %$G% ,) % ) !%)G!/ ! " $/,A8 " )8)1>'5>'.''.4
1 ;!+88$) $ / 8""$A +!+88$)$ % G" / 8""$A 2% 8""$ )8% / / )C 8$, 8 " )8)1>1.>'.'' '
& ;$ 8""8$% ,$ $ $)$% $/,/) $0 M$ ! ,$ $ $)$% $/,/)/ 2 % ) ,$ %$8 %$G %% /,$8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
1& ; )C/$G$,, 8A /%) , %%!) !+88$)%A /$ $ /!! $ /$ ),% /$"A +! )HH 8/$ $ ) /$/" N'' ...; 2" $ GA8 " )8)!%) %$"$ / 8%$ -
! "
#$ % & #$## 9*#1>1.>'.''.1
&1 ;8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
&5 ;H % / 8) /" % % % "% $8" %$ /"/$"A0/ C" ) / $ / % $" $ ) 8G) %% $ $/%A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.*
;+!88$) /" 8 %) ,G$!/$8/ $8 % )% / @ %!/8/ %$ )!G/A8 " )8)*>. >'.''
'.;/ !+88$) /+"% @ ) / , ,%" A 2 / "G " ) / % % ,%$ $/,/) 8""$A 36A8 " )8)*>. >'.''
' ;/$"8/% ) %8 % %$$ )!G$/8 " )8)*>. >'.'' '
'* ;0$/ !+88$)% /%% / % $ ///%)!$%% , 8""$ % /% / ) /"% !/ / 88 " %$G% ) / % $ $ 8""$A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.&
'1 ;!)$ $$ !88$)!%) , %)!/ !88$)!%) , $ %% 88 $)$%/%A8 " )8)*>.'>'.''.5
1 ;;$8 +!88$)% %% , "" 8"$ / @% "/L8""$ 8%$ %)8$ 8A / $/,/)" %8G % " 88 ) 8)$ %8G8""$A8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' .
.4;/ /%) , )$$8$ $" $A8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' '
1 ;/ " 8$ ) %8% /"%A / !" ,$)$!$/$ /% /" / $ )$$$ ) )$$$8$A $$ "$/
! "
#$ % & #$## !*#258124
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #230APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2, / !) $) $ / /" , /%$)8 $88$) , /$ /"$% "", ) / /" $ 88$%%) /"/%G ) "$$ / %)8A/ 8) $$ " , 8$)) !88$) ,)$$$ , "$/ , 8$)) ) )$%$A8 " )8)*>.1>'.'' '
.1; +! /%%! 8""$ , $ $/,/) $/%8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.'
* ;(8 / ) )$%A8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.1
1' ;!88$) $ )$ / ,$%$ %+"H8% ) / /$/O$8 ),%$ M8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
*& ;/$G! /%) )$$$/ ,! / $ )"%%) %)$ ,$EAA "/1. .) %F) /" / $ %% 88$) ,$) !$/$D% "@$8"/"A " % %" )) D8 88 !///$ $ $ ,$!$/ " $$$8 $"8 / 8""$A !%) % , $$$8% $ %$8P" $! %%!%% ! %$"$) ,$%$ E 1.)F !$/ ,% ) !+88$)E / & 1.)F )8$% %$8E/ %$"$) %$)F+!+88$) /!$/ "/1.)FA8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
14 ;! "$$ /"% / /%) % , %!/ 8%% %$ /"/$8A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
' ;(8 $ !$ /% ) $)%$ %$G% , "$$)8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
*' ; % / / 2"!/ /$/ )$ / $" // /A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.5
'' ;/ $((/"% "G /G$%%) /% "G %8%A8 " )8) %8% /% & "!$ ) ,/
! "
#$ % & #$## 7*#*>.&>'.''
.&;"G 8) $ !$/%/"$"$"$"!/!!A %%!$ /$! !/ ") $$,% ) "G8)$A2$/$,$%$ /" G ! " ,$%$ "$$8) $ $ ?)A0$/ /% $8 $8$)$8%% // / %% /$ / ,$%$ $!/ ! 8%) 8 / % / %%A /%) , /8) !$/ /$$ )) $ 8$%C$/ )8$) $!88$A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''
. ; " 8) ) /" ) ,$ $"")$% ) $/"% $D$$)$% A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.'
.; +!88$) /%) / $8%$ / ,$ /8""$8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.'
1' ;$"$)8 $$8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.1
& ;(8 !+88$)% %$ $ ) )) /8""$!/ +!88$) %% $"$ / /%%! 8""$A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
'4 ;!88$) $ / 8""$A !88$) // % $">$8" $8 " )8)*>. >'.'' '
;!+88$) " %$G%!%) )8 "$,$%$)8 / 8" )8$$ ")A !,,% %" $) $ / 8""$ ) / "A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
. ;$ / /$/ 8 %$$ / " !88$)E%8%F% / $8" ) "$ /$/"!/ %%$8 " )8)*>. >'.'' .
* ;!!/ 88 /$/" % /% / "%$G%% $"$) ) $ / 8""$ ) 8$,$$"! / +$)A / % " / ")$8"/ $"$) ) $ $"% $ / $" /$8%A8 " )8)/ $/,/) / %%!+88$)%"
! "
#$ % & #$## %*#259125
APPENDIX F: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #231APPENDIX F ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2*>. >'.''.*
&1 ;/%%!/ / /8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
&& ;C8- @$ %$ / ) % / 8) "$ 8""$$ ) ? %$A / !$%%$ )%!$/ / $8$8 /$ $/$8%/" /% ,)" C )"$/ / /%), %G) )$% / "">$"8" / $ $/ $ ,$A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.5
4 ; !8 $) $)8 %% "8/$ @8)$ "/$ %$G 2CD$" "$$/$ / /%) , ) )$% , $>8$$8$ /$ ) / $ "%>$%% $ $ /8""$A +!/%) , ) )$% /$ $% /$8% ) / " $ %$G% $ $ /8""$A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.
'4 ; ! ) / $" $ / 8""$8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.
&' ;! / $" $ / 8""$8 " )8)*> >'.'' '
1 ;/!/ %$ $ ) / /" /$$"$)8G!/$ 8""$ ) 8 , )8 /!/ $$A/ % "$/ ) / ))$$% %$$ $A /!/ )C%$$%+" " / /" %$ ,/ $ ) $) 8""$ ) C%$ %"% $8" /$$"$)8A 2$ 8) /" $ @ + 8A % 8) /" $" $ ? / + $" + )/%) , ) )$% / $"$)8A8 " )8)'>'&>'.''.
'' ; $ $" 8 $8"
>
E 'EF 1 G$)F+
) $+9 =
! "
#$ % & #$## 4*#8 " )8)'>' >'.''.
'.; )$8$"$)!A8 " )8)'>' >'.'' .
14 ; $ 8% "!///$ )$$8$ $"8 " "$ 88!$/ /"%Q)%$ $ %$ 88,$%$ )$%$ $/,/)A8 " )8)1>.'>'.''.
1 ;0,/ ) 8) //! ,% "/ "8/ !!%) %$G A 2$ $) / $ ,/$$! / 8""$ // $)$ ?, /!/ G88) !%% @ 8A " !+88$) $A0!%) / 8) % % "%A0 )K)$!$ %% /D!8/G$ A8 " )8)1>.1>'.''.
&1 ;$2#%$)$%%$"$8 545 "H /;$ #%% / G $ 551 ) $%% $$) $8 55 A0 !!G $) ," @$8!$/ / B$"B / , / / / " " /G %!)%!$ % /$"8 ! $ %" / "!$/ $ / %$ /A / # /) 8"%$ $ " $/,/) " $/, /" $ % $"% ,GA/ H= 8"%$ 8$%%8$) " $/,! $ %)/" $ ;A #%% / ) ,8/ %8%!G!/ ,) / G$ $$ / ) ",% $ / /A / $/,8%%) / /$AAA8 " )8)1>.*>'.'' '
'1 ;K % )$$8$ ) $% $/8 " )8)1>.*>'.''.4
*1 ;(8 $ $ $ A /%) !$/$) 8$ ",) )$%++/ @$ ++/ $ /%) , ,/ ,%$88"" ) )$8$A /$ /%) , ) $ / )) $/E$$% G$F %$G / 8 "$"A C ) $ " $$ $%%%A8 " )8)1>. >'.''.'
*& ; /) )$$$/ ,! ) ? )) /)8/ !/$ G)!$/ 8$ /%A8 " )8)/ $ / " ? / " $") $ )$A
! "
#$ % & #$## 8*#260126
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #232APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #21>.4>'.''.4
*.;8 " )8)1>.4>'.''
'' ; 8$C,$/! !8/ /$/"A8 " )8)1>.4>'.''.1
.;(8! ) % " 8/A8 " )8)1>.5>'.''.'
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
&* ;"$% / !) $ *. ) /%$) / $"A / ,$%$ ! )" 8$!/ / %%!) !/$/$ %8A0$/ /$ $!!%) , 8) %%A $ /"E % "F%%!/ %@$,$%$ $%% ? / ) !%%A )C,%$ !+88$) C /%) , %$-) ,$ ,% $) / %%+$"A % !+88$)$)8!%%!) / C /!/!%) /" " %$$%!/ %%$" ) $%%$ /$ I(/+!) !88$)$)8 / / , !)$ / 68",'.' "$"/%),,%$ /$$/ ) @8%)) " $% $$ /
! "
#$ % & #$## **#"$$%A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
.5; $ ! / ) / ,$ , ) ,$"A 2% ) $ "$%$ $)% %8 8$A <"$%$) 8 )! 8"" 8/ %$$" $ /G$8/A0/!8$! $8%% /" /! 8 , 8",% ,8 /%" ? ) $ / " /$ ) $ / %A /$G, )$$$/$,! / ! ) $$8$ / /!$%%%$"$ % $" !/$8/ $!$%% / / "%% ,$A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
4 ;!/A % %%!8""$% / $)% 8A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
'* ;$) ,) / 8"$ $ / 8""$A @ / %8% " ) )K! , %) /! "%$A " ) 8""$ "",) )K $8D8 $ " /"!/ " $ $A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
&* ;0/ /%) $ "I; ! 88 /$"EG$ */ 3% ) ", / /%$) @"% )! //$"!/ /C/A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.&
4 ;0/ $)$$)%E!/ ) /@$/!%%+$"$)F)!$/ /$$ $ /$,$ )/$,$ % ,?8 8"" %!%$"$$E$ 8FA % @%$!/ ,%" $ %I" " / /"% "G $ $ ,%"$8$C! G / 8$ $,A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.
;$ "/!"8/ $" $)$!A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.4
&* ; $ % % %8% "$ G$ 8/8 " )8)1> .>'.''.5
*.;8" !G /" 8 " )8)!/%), )!/ /!!$/$8$A /$
! "
#$ % & #$###$*#261127
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #233APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #21> >'.''.&
.';$!/ " % %$G% 8/) $ / $ %8 )!/ "G / "G !/$A % / 8"!$/ 8% " /!R8%) ,)S !/$8/ G! ,$ " / %8% "8/ ) / / %8% 8"A / % " ! ) %%!! % /$$ / "G $ / / %8% 8" ) / $ / / %8%/ ! /G "GTA / % ")% / !/!G,%8%M8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
1.;0/ $ / )$8I ! !) @A % $ %A )C/!$"/!% !%$ / /!!%)G8GA8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
* ;0 %$ $ 8 ) /%) , %%!) !")/% / @$)!/ 8/) / ) , ,$$% $/) ,8 / 8""$ !/% 8 8" !$/ %$ / 8 %$$A $C " % ))C $/ "A8 " )8)1> >'.''.*
*.;/"% /"%A8 " )8)1> '>'.''.4
'.;/ 8$ "!%) % , )$ /$ "%%", %!/!%) ,$A /!%) , / $8/A8 " )8)1> >'.''.1
'4 ;/ /%) , )$8 ,! !888 )888A 2!!%) / )$ 888 , 8$")I8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.
;" % ) ! /$/"A / /$/" %" % ) "$) A /!$/ ,% /$/" /" ,$ !!G/// A /$ /%) , "$)A8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.4
*1 ;$/! / !%) ) , ") / " G$ $88 " )8)1> 4>'.''.4
&4 ;G ! $/A
! "
#$ % & #$### *#8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.
* ;/ %% !)% / " $" / ,% ) /A8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
..;(8 /! / ) %$ $ %% $" / !)% / 8""$A / "$/!$" @ 8A /$/ "$/ / ? $ ")!/ ) / 8/$I8 " )8)1> >'.'' .
1& ; /"!$ $ / , 8$ %@ 8A $ / /%) , $%) $,% // $%% ,G $"!/ "% %$8) )$) ,GA8 " )8)1> >'.''.'
*4 ; /$%%)!$/ )$8$"$$ /!8 " )8)1> >'.''.
1 ;! / $" $ /$$A / /%) , ,% G / $" $ / 8/ )% ! ) /A !!/ $8$$-) G "$8 /$ /8$ / C% !/$8/% /8 / $/,/)C %A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.
** ; $ 8""$ )) $ 8%%8$ %$%$/)L/% $$)8 ? "GAAAA $8%% $8 88$% % !88) , /$G$ ,) , " 8% "%% /%A))$$%% $ C $ ,$8 $/A8 " )8)1>' >'.'' .
*1 ;% %A )% $ , $%,% $ ) /$A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.
& ;/$!%) )% $ $ 8") 8%A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.4
.&; / /"% $ $/,/) 8%$" , !88$) , $K A /%%$ 8 ) $%% 8,%"A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.4
*.;%% /"% / / " $"8 $/,/) )/%) ,%) / "
! "
#$ % & #$####*#262128
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #234APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1>''>'.'' '
1 ;0/// !$ / / /%) , )$8A8 " )8)1>''>'.''.*
11 ; $ D% "A6C"G @8$ / 8%)8 ",%"A8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
..; )C )) / $A $ $ ,/$) $"8 $/, ,% ) 8" "8/$" $ %8A C% 8 $,% , %$8) / )$%,) /!" "/ " %$ /A8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
;0/ $ / )$$$ !88$)I$">$8$%$) +" %% $"$) C,%"G /$/" $%,% )%) 8$ ,$A 6 !88$) 8')/" !!/ /$$)8 /,! @IIC $"% !A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.
&5 ;/$ $ $% / 8""$ ) )K)$8% % / ,%" / 8$ 88$% 8%$" @$A / $ $ $%%) $/!A % / 2 %%!/"% )K/8$/%) , $ $%)A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.'
*.;0!A % / /$$8%% 8/) // ') /" ) $$!/ /$8/)% %%!A /% 8 ?, ) $8" / !A "" ,G ) @A %$"$ $ $"/"!!$%% %$"$ / ", ?, $ %) )$$8%!$)!G8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.&
&& ;/ $ )$$8$ $ 888)%!/ $$)$ $ /A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.5
. ;,8 $ /!%) 8 "C% %A %$/$/!$) ""A ")!/ %% /$ 8)$)/%$G / / 1 & $ $ " 8"%@" 8)!$%% % $% ,A " ? ,$ /A 8/) % ) ,8 / $!)$) $$/ /%$8$ // / $%) / @ %E%FA 8/ $ ) % /%)%$- / / )$) / A " %G$ %% ,
! "
#$ % & #$###9*#", .+'." ! "$/A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.
. ;(8 $ "G ,%% )$8 !////" $ 88$) 1 & ) &)A "! /$/" /" $ $ /$, A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.
& ; $ $%$ K 8$$%$/ )!/ /!!$/ /$$ A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.
&1 ;" % 8"%$8) % ) )$A8 " )8)1>'*>'.'' .
'* ; % )K /$G/ 8$ /%) %% /"%A ) /$G/8%),! "G /%$ "$ %$!$/ / $K%$ 8""$A <@"% /%$ 8%) " 8%$ $ / % "G !>$$ /!$%% % / $" /"% $8"A /$ /! , %$" 8) /"! / /$$ %A $ / / $ /! ) / 8 88$$ " / /"!!%) @)/ " 8"G $% $"" % / 8 /"% $8" / )A /!) ,%$ / ", /"! ,/ $"$)) /!$ / ) , 8$)) $ /$ 8 ) /$,$%$ /" $ ) $8" ) /$$ ) 8$ ) ? /"A ) ,%$ /, /"!!$/ %$"% /$$ $ /"% ,$A $ @"% $" 8$)/$,8 " $!/"?8$%$"" ,8"; ) 8/ /" / ! " ,8)!$/ % $ / 8 /"A <$$8%$ $ /%) ) )) / !) "G/8$$E8 %$8 %)$ @ 8AF" 8% $8/ 8A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.1
1& ;,%$ !/%),,%)!/ / %!$//$ % / $/@)$$ "A)/$GC ) !G ,!/ (G ;" $8 $ $%)A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.*
&* ;$C$/A $ / $) "$8 /%) , ,% )!/ !!A
! "
#$ % & #$###!*#263129
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #235APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1>'*>'.''.&
1 ; "8/ /$G$!%) , $8 )! )$$8$ /$G$!%) , )$$8% 8 /$A8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.4
.&;$/ 8/ D% +8 " )8)1>' >'.''
* ;/+"% $ /+"%A8 " )8)1>' >'.'' '
'4 ;" /$$ $) "$% ) /$!/"!%% % $A8 " )8)1>'4>'.''.
'.; )) /%$ , / "!88$) 88$8 " )8)1>'4>'.''.
'* ;%$ /%) , 8$ ) D%%)% !//$ $ $"$)8 A8 " )8)1>'5>'.''.5
;(8!!!/ / , 8"$ *.: ) 8$ 8""$ %$ $ A0 )C%$ /$@"/ ,!$"$%$>8""8$%% "$) )!%)/ , )!$/ /!/ A / //8$$ / /%) ,)$$) 8/ "%$%+$ !/$ AAAAI8 " )8)1>'5>'.''.1
& ;,,% / "?$ /"! / 8) /" /)" , / "/A $%%!)! )) / /"! @ ) %8% 8/ "G! $$$8)$) ?, %$A ))$$ /$ % / !88$) /" 8!$%% ,,% 8 8$ " / /"!/ 8%) ) / / )!%) %%A $ / %) //" $8!%) 8" )! / "/%8%!G,,%),$G$ /"A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.4
4 ;0 ,/ 8$ /" $ !" )!$/ ,$ ,% !!$%% / %%A ; % $ / " , /8"!$%% 8/ $ " #$%%M
! "
#$ % & #$###7*#8 " )8)1>1.>'.'' '
'4 ; !88$) $ /%) , ,% /"$$)$% $/,/) %%A $)$% $/,/)!)$) $ 888A /!)$)% %$ /$ 8""$A8 " )8)1>1.>'.'' '
* ; ,%$ / /!B!88$)B$)8 / /"A /$G/ ",$D$ "%% ) //$G/%$ /%) HH/"! !//$C')/" $" /"A % /$G/ )$$8$!%) , /)8P%$8A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.
14 ; /%) / / ,$%$ /$$ /%A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.'
1.;/ 2 /%) )$$$/ / %% %$A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
11 ; / /%) , % +!88$) $A; / / ) 8$% // /% / %"$A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.4
;/$ $ / ,%"A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.
&5 ;0)! )$% !88$) A !88$)A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.5
* ;/"," $%,%!$%% ,$ " % // / 8 " )8)1>1 >'.'' '
;<$ ) /$G/ !%$$ $ "/'"/ $ $ "G )$8 $!/ $ 88"%$/A %C % 8/ 8% ) /$8$! )$$8% 8$- /$ 8$A !!/ %$ $ "/ )/88$%%8%))8$)"2!$$ ) %% $" ) % 8/$A /$ $ ? @"% !/ 8 "G )$$8$A / $ ) / A /$) $ ) %8$A %% /88$$8%A
! "
#$ % & #$###%*#264130
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #236APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1>1 >'.''.&
.; ) "A / $ /%) %% %!/ / 8 )!$/ /$% % / 8"%$!$/ ) %8%%P%$A8 " )8)1>1 >'.''.5
* ; !!/ "$%%$ )%%/$ )/% @ /%) / /$/ )!//!!$/ /$ %$)C $"8 /A8 " )8)*>. >'.''
&.;!/$/A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
.';0/ ) $ "I% / $/ /$ /!/ $!// / %$ /A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.4
*.;!/$%% %%) / " 8 , %$) $"%8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' .
..;0/ % )!/$ $ /$,$8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' .
; +!88$)$)8 /% / 8""$ 8"$8%% ,$)$ /$ 8$% "% ) )A0$/ / /$ 8/$8 $ /)8$/$%%/) $$ "$ ) 8$% / /%)$A/$ $ $" / 8""$A8 " )8)*>.'>'.''
*.;)KG!!/ / )$$$ !88$) $A8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' '
'5 ; ,%$ $ "GA 8%) / ))%$$) %%$ ) %$ %% $" $ /) , ,% ) /")$" %/% !$%%8 " )8)*>.'>'.''.
.4; /%) , ) D%%A !88$) $)"$,8 / 8$ ,$ "/!88$)8 " )8)*>.'>'.''.
'4 ; /%) , ) / " + ) %$G?)$8 "A )C /!/ $ )$8 ,!!!/ $ %$$ $/$$)8 "/ % ) " %!/ " ,%$$ $ /$$)8 % / "/A 2!8 $
! "
#$ % & #$###4*#/ // 8$-$ /"!I2"! / + /0 /$/" ) / /%) , ,% )!//!!$/ /$/"A 8 /!/$ $ 88 / 8$ /!/ 8$ /$G / 8 %%% )$8!/ /"!)!$//$! /"M</" /$ "" $8 ) " /" $ %% / " !$ $,, /$/"A $,, ) " /" / ?8$$8 !$)$A / !$%% ) " /$! /"
/ 8//$/ ) $,% / ,8 / /% $ $!/ $ $ /$/"A 1) "" $8 $ %% % $) $G$ /$$) )A8 " )8)*>.1>'.'' .
*4 ;(/ )@8$8 %8%!G / "GA8 " )8)*>.1>'.'' '
. ;K$" !" !8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.
' ;(8 $ $ ,$% /$$"$)8 ) $ $%%$/ $8A8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.&
&& ;/ "/% $ %$8,%A / % , "/ BB !A ))$8) $!$%% % , &.)A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.
*5 ;0/"%$%/"8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.
&* ; !$ /$/" / /%) ) $ / %$ @)) $) $" / 88"")$% 1.) %AC%$$8 " /+"% /" + $ % //"$,$ !/$8/ $!/!$ $)A8 " )8)*>.*>'.'' '
1 ;(8 $ C! /%) / /$/ % 8)>/" ) $"%% !/$A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
' ;U / "
! "
#$ % & #$###8*#265131
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #237APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
14 ;/$% "!/ 8 " /%,/ !8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
&& ; $"% $8" %%! % !$8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
& ;(/ /%) %% )/ "$8$ )%$8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
. ;0/ $%$$%)I8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
; %$$ $ 8$$- /"!/$! $ )$8$"$ )8$8$ )$8$"$$ /%) , $ 8$% )$A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
' ;0 /) 8) &. $ // /A"$% / $ %% * , 8$% $@"/ A!%) , $8$ 8) /" ! / 8"%!$/ "$8$%$A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
*.;/ $ )$$8$ ,! 8) /" !) % ) /" !) $" A / " / % "% 8G / %A / "%% $D ) /% !/$ 8A /%D ) ,$ %A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.&
*4 ; $$$8 8" / /$ $ / $ <G#%% $)) % $8" ) 8$% $ $$A " /% $8" 8" $!$%% $$,%)8)") ) %% %A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.
*1 ;/$G/"!/ /$/ /$ $ ) / / $ @ $ / $ <G#%%A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.*
& ;FK / 8$K ,$ /!% 8/ /$$(F))K ,) ,!/$8/ ,% /8"$8 8$$ 8"A 6K "$ /! 88 /" A
! "
#$ % & #$###**#8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
.*; $ %!/ %$ $ / A / %8!//!88$) "G % / 8 ,)) , /!G8A % " ! " / 8)/" // / %% , " , ,% "/ %A0/ /%) / , %%!) G$" 8 / 8 / I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
1* ;"$,% )8A $)) 8D8A ;))%"" /%) %K%$A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
1* ;/ ! )$ ,A !88$) $ /) 88$% $ %$) $ /"!$/ "$% / )% $"A !88$) $ $ 8"$!$/ /$8) /% $ / %%!$ % ) % " / " 8 ) 8$, 8" !/$8/ %! $ "$% )$ , $A / ) %8 A 6!! )$ $$!/! 8" G$ , 8) /H$% %%I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
&& ;; ! ) / $8" G /$/"A ;! 8 % )%$$$",$ /$/" $"A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
14 ;/$)$8 ,! !+88$) ) !+88$)A(/ 8 / ! / A / ! /%), ) D%%A / ,/ @ / / 8$ A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
&' ;!%) , /%% $ )$) / , " $ /D$A "$ / / !" , $ / $!/$%$ / )$!$/ /$A ; $$8""$! ) /$! 8 ) /$%$G/%A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.5
; $)$8$"$$8 " )8)*>.&>'.'' .
&' ; !88$) $ 8%% 8 % "$8$%8 ,8 % ) %$ $ 8""$ %% $"A /!) 888 " , %% )$ G , % / %%$" A
! "
#$ % & #$##9$*#266132
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #238APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)*>.&>'.''
&4 ;% "%$ $ 8"%@ !88$) ) /2% /% / @ !/$8/ / 8""$!%) %$GA / 2 /%) / $8AAA8 " )8)*>.&>'.''
&4 ; % % %%+$" ! )$8 @ $ /+"% $ ) 8/$/"@ /))$$% $8"!/$% / %!$/ /$"$%$ ) ) $ )$$$/$ ,! / !A(/!+88$) ) !+88$) / " " $ @ $ 8 8 A /"A !$%% % %) " % 8%$"$ /$%%+$"$)8 $ ) ) /!$%% 8/ $ ,!/$8/ 8%) / "$)) 8D8A8 " )8)*>.&>'.'' '
'* ;/$!%) %$- "$%$!///)/"$/%%" " "$%!G8$ ) /$ $$ % 88$%% /% 8/ @A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.1
'* ; 8%) ,8" )$8$"$ 8%) G! )" )$// ? ! %8$8"8 8/ 8/ !$/ #6 "$% 8 ) 8%) )% $"8%8% ?, /%/ )!%%+,$ / 8""$8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.*
&5 ;(8 ) /"% / %8G /%88"")$A % " %"$%$% /$ G$8/ " /" "% 8$%% $8 8%)K / / $8 ) " %% !D$"/ $ )8 ,G$ ,%A % ) ) /$"$%$ $!GAK8$8% ) ,) /8 %8G )$$ $ /%A /K!/!/ 8) ) /" $ ))$$ ,$!$/A "$ / "$%$ % /%8% "$% % %$ $8G G$ % )D$"%A/ $ % 8",$) % ) @ " ) % $ /%$ /% AH% ,$ /"%!$%% % / ),% /$)$%"" $ $ "%$"$%%$ )%%$$)8 ),% /$ !G "$ / 8%%,% $ !/$8/ "8/ 8 "$ % ) @ $%@ !$%% $"% $ " ) +$%$-)A 6 ;%$- / / @ /% ) /$/$,)$$8""$ 8%) D "?$ / )$ /D$ ,$%) ))$$%),% /$I(8$ I2K 8%% "$$ / ,
! "
#$ % & #$##9 *#) /%) , ;A /$ %$G 8$ $ 8 %$8A 6K"G ) $K,,$ %$ 88"")$ 8,$%$$A / /!$%% %%/) #$% $)A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
.4; /%) "$8 " /$ %% )$%A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
.;C %% / " $%%A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
1& ;0/ !/$/"8 8 %8$ 8 !88$) ) !88$)A %% /$/ 8% /$/D%$ "$8 ) $A $ )$ / " / / 8A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.5
.*;B!888B $ $$$8 $ $ %$"$$ $8%% $ / $ $ ,$ ") 88 /$ $%8 " )8)*>. >'.''.5
'& ; $ $%A " " %$ $ %%+$" ) / !!A " " %$ /$$" ,! )"!/ %A " " ) "8/ $" / 8 $A0/ / !) $ 8"%% $%A8 " )8)*>. >'.'' .
.5; ,$ ", ) $ / /" , / !/%)C)"$ /%$A @$ ) )$$8% "$) 8 "A8 " )8)*>. >'.''
.';(8 / % / 8" %$ $ ) %% ) % / /%G$$ ) /$ 8 "/"A / )) " " )K8 /$A // / 8"!$/ "$% 8$ %%!/%A6%%//$/) / $ /!/$8/"G %$$ )$$8% ) @$ ) $%,%A8 " )8)*>. >'.'' '
'' ;0/I/ %%% / )/ )$8$ /!A %%!) / /%) , %%!) %%A K/" $"8
) 8$ ) / ,) $ /$ $8"%% $ 8"A ,) %8% +!/%8%$A
! "
#$ % & #$##9#*#267133
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #239APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)*>. >'.''.1
&.; " $C $ 8%$$ !/$ $ , / 8 8/ $A $ 8$ / $8 % "% 88 @%)A !!$%% 8/ " " $% %+"/$A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.&
* ; ) "G)$8 $ $ !88$)A / ) / ) / " /) $ ,) "G P/%/ %8% 8" %% %%8 " )8)*>. >'.''.4
'5 ;% /%) , ,% )!/ /!!$/ /$A /%) , 8%%)A0/ $ / 8/ /$"$) /!%/%$$/$I8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
1* ;!/$/)$$$!+88$)A !!/ ) &"/ /I $/)$$8$!+88$)"!/ )C " / .) III8 " )8)*>.4>'.''
*.; +!+88$) /" $ 8E// B%8%BFA(%%!$ /" $8$$/ $ )))% / 8" $ @ ?, 8A !) %%!/" $8$ /!$%% / 8$, ,%% /$ 8"AE;%$G!) 8FA $ /$/% %$G% / /$8/!%)% $ " %+" % / %8%A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.
&' ; )K!/ )$8 $ /%) "GA(/ $) $% /$ $$A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.'
' ; ,%$ $ )"88 ) "G 8"$8++ ) /$/ !/$ )$ /! $ )A / $ / "$8!8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.1
* ;(8!/ )$8 ) $ "GI8 " )8)*> >'.'' .
&1 ;"! $)8 1' $ A / "$$/ /$A <"%$%!$/8/ 8"%$8) , ,$%)! /$ A )C / )D % 2%8 ) /$G)%$ / $ ) $) ,) / )%" ! 88"") / %G!/ 8" ) )!$ $) @" 8A 'A 6 %%! / )G)
! "
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
>
E 1 EF *G$)F+
) $
! "
#$ % & #$##9!*#268134
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #240APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2+! & ' - &
2
-
&
1
. .
;
2 3
6
7$ 3% /#56*7 398/856= +
! "
#$ % & #$##97*#8 " )8)'>'4>'.''.
* ;$)$% $ /%) $"$% %8% 8""$AH) $$ ) %8)!$/$ / $ 8A /"% /%) % , %%!) $$)8!/ / %8%% %$$A $/,/) $"8) , %!/ /B)$"B)$) $ 8""$A $ ) % 88 $ /"%AH) %)D$) "$/ $A $) /"% ) 8 , / $ % , /$ $"A8 " )8)'>' >'.''.'
' ;/A "/%) ,D$) ))"8$ $/ $/,/) $"8A8 " )8)'>' >'.'' .
14 ;= / /%) , )$$8$ , /"% /%) ,@) / " 8""8$%A8 " )8)1>.1>'.''.
&1 ;0! ) ,%$ / 8 $ B%)$B-A $)$% $/,/) 8%) / ", 8%% $ / $ %) 8"%$)$ G$ $ 8A $ " $/,/) !$) , 8%%$ / %$8 /$ )$ $ " )$ B $B BHAB % % % @ / $8! ?A = "$/8$)H$ / !/ 88 " ,,%$/) 8"%$ $ $)$% $/,/)A8 " )8)1>.*>'.'' '
'1 ;/ )$% $8) ) $) )$ "$$A )8$!$%% $8 /% $8A8 " )8)1>.&>'.''
1 ;;$)$% $/,/) $ % $"8) , / 8,$ $ * 8" / % A 8 A / / ) 8 "8/ " $ /D$ $/,A0 / / ) G/ % ,D$A8 " )8)1>.&>'.''.
. ;,8 / ) , $"$% / 8 / )$ / % " "G%!/$8/ $!/ " )% ) 8 / 8" ? " 2 " ," ) $)$% , ",$%)$!$/ )$ $- ) $8$!$/ $%$
+7=
! "
#$ % & #$##9%*#269135
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #241APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2" / , % "% %% $" %8%A0/$)!/ / , $% / !G) G$ 1&8 $)$ % "% !%! /) !%%G!$ $,8 / / /" %$A ) %$ $ $)$%- 8) ,$%)$ ,$ , + )$ % $ 8$$ 8%AH )$$ $ D$- ) ' ,%8G" 8$ "GA8 " )8)1>. >'.''.'
*& ;/ %% )$ $$ ) $!)C"G )$$8$ %% $ $ !$%% 8$ /%A8 " )8)1>. >'.''.*
4 ; ) /% $ / 8$ /! ,$% ,8G$/ .C ) % 4.C ! )$) 88"") / A/ / "$$ ) 8%$)) $8A ; /" %8) $ / )!! 8""8$% 8 8% /$ ) 8$$$A /$$8 %!G$ ! ,$%)$// /%$ %% !A8 " )8)1>.4>'.'' '
.*;%% / 8$) , $ / $)8$ /$D$A8 " )8)1>.4>'.''.*
* ;0%% C "") $ !%% %)A0/ $)$% $ -) $)$% $/,/) ) $ )$%8 "$% / 8%) %$ / $) 8 $ )$8 $ / $/,/) ) 8$% 8$ 8""8$%,$A /$ $!/! /-$ + 8 /D%$ %$ $$)$% $/,/)A8 " )8)1>. >'.''.5
&5 ;/ / ,$ ,$ ) /%) , /%) /" @ )-$ %! /A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.&
4 ;$ / 8) $ A! $ "$% ,,% /"/ $8%% / G$ A $ $ $! $// / $ $ $)% / "/ ,! G$ !/ ,$ $ $ I" $8" " $ @) / %$ $ " 8) @ ) / / $8 / / " $%$$8A0$/ / !%) , %$"$) ? /% ,)A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.&
* ;/$G /%) /%,) / %) $)// "G$" )$$8% / 8$% A " $G/ /% $)/!$%% !/"
! "
#$ % & #$##94*#% )%$ %%!A/!$%% % ) $C"/$$/ "$ ,/$) / /% / /"%"G B / %$ $%)BA /$ $ ,A // /% $ $ / )") $$A /$ $!// /"% "G 8" $ %A / "G %%!))$$% $$ 8" ) 8) /" )) /$"A= )C! " ,$ %,% /% $ A0/!%) /"A ))$$% /%!%) 8/ /8/8 / !A / /"% $) "% % @ ) $ ))$$% 8"$8 )$/ !A!/!%) !8/ / , ))$ !8%$I8 " )8)1> .>'.''.
;$% !)$)8 8""8$% $A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.4
&* ;$ ,/ D%%!%) ) ,) $)$% !A ; ! / /"%AH)/ %">8 ) / % ,$ " @ @"$/ $)$$)% !",$ "A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.
& ;8)!$%% / +$ ""A +!+88$) /"!$%% A8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
* ; /$G"$ ,)" $ !G $" $ )$ / / /% %) / $ %% $" / ,$A/$C / /$ $ $ ) / $8" $,% / 8/ 8 / $ !A8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
&& ;H) / 8$ ) $8 /$ ,G$ 8%$ 8A0/$% "$)$% $/$ / " ) ) ) / ,$ " /% ,/$)/" ,8G$A ; $ , ,% $$ %$ $ / "G $ $8$%% $,%A 2% ) $) /$A8 " )8)1> >'.'' '
.5; %) $ ,)" !,)" $ %%!) 1." ) % /" .%" + $!$%% ,,% )) 8)$ /% %)!$%% )) % 1. .8A8 " )8)1> >'.''.*
*.;/ )$ !$/ )$ @8$ "A % $)$% $ %% !) ) "$$)
! "
#$ % & #$##98*#270136
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #242APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2, $)$$)%!/ ) / / $8$% 8"$8 %,,$!/ 8 ! /A8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.4
*1 ;$)$% $ ?/AK$)8A / %8)$8""8$% ) /%) , @) 8""8$%$A8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.4
&4 ;(8 / )$ !/$ 8A 8 / )$A8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.
. ;=)8$$ , $ " ) + $8 G$ )G$8 8A8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.
* ;/ ')$ %AA ;, /" / !), ,$ ) ) % % /%) , ) %$G %) , $)$$)% !$ /$/ /%) , %%!) $)/ ) % , ,% $ A / %$"$ / " $"/" 8%) ,) AI8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
..;(8 / )$8 " )8)1> >'.''.'
1& ;</ ) , 8$%%
H) %%%8)$ / 8$E- )$$8F/ $)) ))$) $) / $"8 8""8$% 8/ $ ) G$A #8$% / $$)$%,$%)$ $/,/) %8) $ / 8!$/) / $"8 /%!$/ ,)$ $/,K$8A @ %) ,) 8""8$% @A #8$% ,$ %8) $$)8 /"8/%! @ ,)A8 " )8)1> >'.''.'
*4 ;%) 8""8$%A /" $)$%8 " )8)1> >'.''.
1 ;%$ ) @ /+"% /%)D$/%%!$/,/)%A ! /%) /D$)@A8 " )8)<%% / %$) $ / @%$ , $8%% /
! "
#$ % & #$##9**#1> 5>'.''.5
. ;88 / %) D$) ) ""$$/$$"8 / )$ A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.
** ;$)$% $ / $$$8% ! / %)8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.
&' ;$)!/ !$$)$% / @8$ //$$/,/)!$%%"$$)$%A $8) /+"%%$ " 8/% 8/ %$G$(P(8 D$ "$% $/,/) $ ,$ )$$8A8 " )8)1>'.>'.''.1
& ;2$/ >/$/$8$)$% $ /%) , "$)$$)$%- ,%) %$"$ /" )"$$ $"8A " % $$ %%$)$% B"$$+/%BA 8 "%%8 $)$%$ ) @$ /"%A8 " )8)1>' >'.'' .
*1 ;/ )$8 , "G A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.'
'' ; ) /% ?/ /%A/$!/ / $)) ,A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.4
*.;</ ) ,)$ +$ "" ) /"$D$" /% ) %)A8 " )8)1>''>'.'' '
1 ;(8 / %$8C% ,$ /% / $$)$%$ /%$ / , $ %8 %A8 " )8)1>''>'.''.'
.&; ""8$% @ /%) , ..O$ $ " $8"A /$8/
F8 " )8)1>''>'.''.*
11 ;/ $"8 $ "8/ "$$)$% /"%A / %)$ ) 8""8$% )$$8 / ,-) ))$) 88 /$ $8!/$$)$%- / @ /"% )C 8" / /$"8 $ 8 / 8% )D$ $" /!-) A
! "
#$ % & #$##!$*#271137
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #243APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1>''>'.''.
&5 ;9$A " $/,/) /%) ,$)$% " 8 ,%)$A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.4
'1 ; )$8 ,8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.
5 ;/ / " ) / )$ $"8 / 8""$A( /$ +$ "" $ $/,/) 8 % / 8 ,/ /!/ %!$/%8D8A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''
.';%) 8$8%% $ /" $$A$)$%$$ /!8 ) /%) , ) / % / %$)!G/A / $ /!G/ ) / %8G),% /$ $!! 8$ / /% ")$8% ) /!G / "/$ ) , )A8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
. ;(8 / C @8% / " /$A C)"G /" % "D% $ " /% / / ! 8/"G$ /"$,% "$$$ ) @$ /" %$G 8""8$% , +)+ ,$ !%)C /" /"AH$G!%)CD$ " /$/) $ % /%E? $ /F 8""8$% ,%$/"A8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
1* ;/"% G$%%$ $/,/)A $/,/) $/, # H8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.*
*' ; )C ,%$ / !88$) C /", $/ / /% 8) /%A ) / "G/ / /% "GA = $8/ "$8 $$ /!%)//%) )!88"")$ 8!/$% @$8$ C8$ )$$ ) /$A /$ $ ")$$ $ !C AC/" )$,% / 8""$ %I8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.
* ;$ % ) AH) ,$ !$/$)!%%$ 8 /")$ / $ A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.
. ;(8 8%% /$)$8A0%G$ , !8"%% )$ $$A
! "
#$ % & #$##! *#8 " )8)1>'*>'.'' '
& ;" % ) '*>4 /$ ) $"A 8$%%8%$% / $$ /A/$G$K" / %) " / G$8/ ) /$8 / /% 8KA $ "!G !%% " , %%A8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.
* ; ) /% ,$%$)$% $ / 8/"% )%$ $) %8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.
& ;" $ %)8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.4
.&;8 -$ + ) 2% $ 8""8$% 8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.
.1;=+,>8/"%$G% 8$ $ / $)8 $ ,$ ) % / $" ) / !$ $ / //$"A /$ $ $$$8 )$$8$%$ %)A8 " )8)1>' >'.''
* ;(8$)$% $ $"8!G$ %!/ )$)K /$ 8$$ %% / $ /$$/,/)A8 " )8)1>' >'.'' '
*& ;/ )$8 !$/ / $"$%$$A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.
* ;(8 %% / /$ ) ,8 " )8)1>'4>'.''.
'.;H) $" G8 " )8)1>'4>'.''.
'* ;#$$!/ 8/ $ /+"% %% "$%$!$/G$)!/!>) "%$% ,)" $ $ ) % /$%$$" %@A % " "$%$ ) G$8/ )! /,$%$ 8G// "%A %) 8!)) / ) /)$ $$$ $ 8) ) / / / ))) ,$ +$$ A
! "
#$ % & #$##!#*#272138
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #244APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1>' >'.''.&
.1;2% ) %) ") / / 8 /$8!$/ /"A @ $)$% %$G /% $?$)$8% 8$)$ / %" $$8 " )8)1>' >'.''.&
' ; )>/% $%% ")A $)$% $ B")B , %!/ %% )C8 , /$$/,A8 " )8)1>'5>'.''.4
1 ;)$8 $-$ ) $ @A8 " )8)1>'5>'.''.5
; $8%) )$$8$ "G A )$ / $ $>)$$ !%% G$ $ $/,/) ! 8$ "@$"" 888 ",A8 " )8)1>'5>'.''.1
& ;%)E8) /%F" %% ) / " / 1,)"A $ /" 8 , %@)) "$%%AH) )$ /" 8)% %% /" ) 8 , $8/) $%A $ /" 8 /B)B / "$%$ A % $ / %/" ,$" $ 8""$ A / ) "$8 ) /)8$A8 " )8)1>1.>'.'' '
'4 ;$)$% $ 8""8$% ,$ ) /%) ,A /! ,$% ) )$) $/,G!8/ /A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.'
1.;/ ! )$ / 8$A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
14 ; ) /% / "" $ %% '*>4 " /$"A $)$% $ %% / "" / 8 , A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
&5 ;$"8 / $$)$% $/,/) ) "G $ %$,%%% $"$)A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.*
;$)$% $ -) 8""8$% $ )8 8 /8 $/,8 " )8) ) /% %% ") ")A = "
! "
#$ % & #$##!9*#1>1.>'.''.4
;)$!/ ;) " $ / 8@ /D$A 8)% $%% ") ) A /$ $ /,%"A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.
&5 ;0! %) $ 8 %)A8 " )8)1>1 >'.'' '
;/$D$ $ )",A /$H6= )$$8$ ,!%) $ )% $ )!$%% H0= ,A % / % ,%% $ $8)$,% $88AAA B )8%$ /D$" %) / /$ $) D%$ $$@$8 ) 8$, K 8$%$ 8$$ 8" ) "$$ $,% " $8 $$$8% "$/ /D$) 8$%AB /$ " $ 0 M#8$% 8$, ) 8$%$ 8$$ 8"A /$% ) /!$ / %)$$B$$$8% "$ / /D$) 8$%AB2 (MM A0/ $"8 / /"% $"8/ %%!$ $-$ / 8$,$ ) 8$%$$ $,% 8"
+/G+;?$ /G/ " ) /$! 8"A +" 8%+;A#8 /P 8A A + "+ % / " %!G$ / ; 8" +!%!$ $8 +/ $8 +/ , $8 8" +%8% 8/ ) 8 +%$ +88$ 8" / %$ ) M8 " )8)*>. >'.''
'.;$ ) /%) $ %)>8)>/% $/,/)A ; @$8 $ / / @ )!%8" %!/ % ) %) )$8 / %8% )8,)!$/)A8 " )8)*>. >'.''
' ;H) ) /% $ ""8$%- , $) $88"")$ ) $8 $8 " )8)*>. >'.''.4
*.;/ , / )$8 /! / ,$/$- ) /$// 888 C/" /",% %) ", A8 " )8)*>.'>'.''.5
1 ;$)$% $/,/) ) / 8$ ) !%% ,$ /$% % " $/,8) , $" /$ )/"%A
! "
#$ % & #$##!!*#273139
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #245APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)*>.'>'.'' .
.4; ) + /% /$$8%% /"%8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' '
1 ; !$/ )$8% $ )!! $ /% %) $ ) $ %%% 8A = "$%$ ) / $ / "%% %) ) G!/%) ! %$ 8""$A /$G/$)$%% 8 $) / 8""$ / $$!/%$G8D$ /"%!$/ " %8%$)A /"% /%) )$$% ))$$% 8$ 8 @E@ 8% $) $ " $8F) %%!%$!$/)G$ $ ) $/,/)%A 2! $/ %$8$ ) @ ,8" /$/ / $ $,)" $!$%%)/ /% " A8 " )8)*>.'>'.''.
'4 ; " + $%I/$C /$"8 $)$%!/// !$ 88$ / A8 " )8)*>.1>'.'' .
*4 ;(8 %) $ ,$% / $ 8/ /" "8/ !A )K /%) , 8$)) %)A8 " )8)*>.1>'.'' '
.1; $/,/)!$)) 8$ ) /%8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.'
* ;(8 /H)E ) 2%F ) $)$% $ /)$ $"8A8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.1
1' ;" ! $ $ D$M8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.
&* ;H) $ ") , $$!$/ "")$$$A ;$)$%% ") ,% ,G!/ ) "A/$$!//$%$+!"$8$)$% /+"%A8 " )8)*>.*>'.'' .
.&; $ $ ,$ %) $ /%) , @) 88)$%A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
14 ;!!$/$% " , ,% 8"%!$/ /D$"A
! "
#$ % & #$##!7*#8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
& ;$$)$% $ )$ $"% / 8""8$% A/ /%) , 8$)) )$% $$!/ $ 8"%$8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
; 8/" $ /% ) $))% //A( $ % 8""8$% 8$$8 , % $ " A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
*.;H) $!-) ) "$) /"%A/ /%) 8$ $ / "!$/ %$"$$ D8 %A " , /$8$ $)$%$ " , $A <@"% %$"$$ / ",!G$)$% 8 ,) /" " ,$A %$ /%) , )$) )/"% " / % "% %A 8) /" , )$$$ /%"% %A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.
*1 ;/% )$ / $% !) $A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.*
& ;/ $)) )$8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
*& ;<" @ 8$ /$G$ / $"$%%)$ ,$ !//8) /% $)$% $ /%) 8/ " @ ,)A <" ) $/,/) $"88$ $)$% $ / %$/% )$ $"8 )@8$ ! ) ) , " 8)%$ )$)$$)% $ $ $/,/)A <@"% D )G$ $"8 8 , )! /%) 8$)% /D$ %%/ %$"$ % $ $) D$+$ + G$A0 /%) "G! %$,% )$$ 8) $/,/),EAA $8G "/ %$8 @8 $ 8$ /%) , 8-@$FA / //) $ $ $"8$8% $% $ / %%+$" $%,% '*>4A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
.*; ""8$% %)$ $)$% %)$ $"$%, )$A(/ )%) )$% , $"$%%A)K /$/@ $)$% %)$ $ , / @ )/%) , "G) !G8 /$ )A /
! "
#$ % & #$##!%*#274140
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #246APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2 8%) , ) ,$)$- !G8A %" $8$$-! /!G8 8 , ))" /$/@A ""8$% %)$ )$)$% %)$/%) / $ "$$$ )! 8% ")%$GA $$) ) 8 , $$/%) ,$,% ) /%) $8$ $! "$$$A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
1* ;</ ) $ /D$A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
14 ;H) " $ 8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
14 ;H) ) /% 8""8$% A / )$) % )A $ /" ) 8) / " 8""8$% A %% / $)) ) ) ) %),/!A / / %8/) / $ $ /!8/)!$/ / $ " $8$% /% / 8 !/$A 8// 8!!%) , )$ " $ $!A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
*' ; $ ,$) " / '!G /$/%) , 8$)) 8""8$% A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.5
;)$$)% /"! /%) , ,?8 8""8$%%$ ) @$8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.5
'' ;(8 / $"8 /"% $ /$)$% 8 / %$ $/,A8 " )8)*>.&>'.'' .
&' ;= 8 "G )$$8$ ) ,/ 8 8+@$A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''
.&; " / % , % / "G 8) /% ) /"% $A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''
. ;U $)$% D$ $ ,$ %) )/%!/ ) / $8 ) $
! "
#$ % & #$##!4*#8 " )8)*>.&>'.''
&4 ;= /!-)H) / $)) $) /+" /%) / ))$$% $) / @ A1O%) $ %8A8 " )8)*>.&>'.'' '
'* ;/ $%% )$8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.'
.; ) /% )$ "8/ )" / 8""$ $)$% $ ) $A ) /% / %! ,/+"% $ / /$%$ $)8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.'
1' ;$-8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.1
& ;(8$)$% $ 8$ "$$+%) $ ,8 /$$- ) / /%) , ) 88)$%A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
.;/%$!$/H)A C//+"% $/" 8A / "?,%"A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
'4 ;H "$) %$ $$)$% $ ) $"8) ,/"% / /%) , 8)A % /% 8""8$%!/$%$)$% !$ /$$) / / 8/8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.5
.*; ""8$% %) $) $8 ,) / $)$% 8 " )8)*>. >'.'' '
;(8 / )$ ) / /%) , ) )$%M" $$!/ 8" ) 8/ 8$% " %G$ )$G$) @$8//$ $8% /%A /! % B /"B// 8""8$%% /%!$/ , %,, ) '*+/$%%8A/!/ $ /$/" /%) ,$% /$)%$ %%! / %) )!$/ #( ) / %$G , ))$$% $8 $>"%$A ; 8$% ") , /$%8% !!/G!/$! $/, ) $/,/) ,M0//$/% 8$ %% " $!$%% )$ ) )A0/// $ $ %$E@$ < , ,F , 8 %% 8$$$ 8$,$ 8$$ 8"
! "
#$ % & #$##!8*#275141
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #247APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2$ %% ,$ $ !M @ /$//$ "$ / OD$) , #( ) / /*A*O/8$A;!%$ ? "G ) " "$ $ ) "% / ))$$%$8" 88$% $%A ""8$% ,$ 8$% $ @ @"$M8 " )8)*>. >'.''.4
&.;/$G$)8 / " / "O/%) , )")%) 8""8$% 8$$$ / /$,$) $$)$%-)8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
. ;)$8% , !+88$) $ ))$8) ,$)) / % $"8 / %8% $8A 8/ / /%) , ) )$% 8 " )8)*>. >'.''.5
'& ;2 /%) , @) / ) %) /%) , @) 8""8$% $AH) ) ) $ / "/$A 2 " , %) $" A %%8$ % ) %)$ @ % / $ /A8 " )8)*>. >'.'' .
* ;H)$ /%) , %8) $% $ -) 8/ $8%)$ )!! A $)$% $/,/) / C-) %)$ 8""8$% $ $$ %)$A C)$ $/,/) "%$ "!A0/! %$ @ /!/ $ )$ /!%%,$ / $/,/)I/ G%% / $)!%G )C/%8$ $ 8A / 8A8 " )8)*>. >'.''
.';(8 $ /) $) %8 %$ $ %A "$ /A0",,%$,,8 " )8)*>. >'.'' '
'' ;=A / )$ , +$8%%8 " )8)*>. >'.''.1
&.;= 8C 8/ / %8$ $)$% /"% $/!) G /" / $/,/) ) 8%$)/" $ !A / $ / ,$ /% $ / /%%G / $!/! 8""$! /" ,$ $)$% $/,/)A
! "
#$ % & #$##!**#8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
1* ; / <2 / 8% $" A / "$ )"(GE%%$"F / 8$ / @E A1OF8%%8)"%A <2 / /) 8"%$ " /$/, " $ " /$ A 8)!/$8/ /8"" A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.5
4 ;/ )$8 $ "" 8 @$ )-$ 8,$)$$8$//%),8G!%))!$/$ / @8$)D$" $ ,/ A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''
*.;2% B%)B "8/%$ + ,/ $ ,$ )$ /$8% $-> A = 8 $% @8"%%$)$% /" /%)/ B"B%$ / B%)AB "$% & 8/8G$$$/!// " B $ $"8B / 8""$ )/ 2 66E/)F % 8/8G$ $> /%) 8/ ) )A/C/%$8 , ))A / $"% 8 , $!) D% 8""8$%%$A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.'
' ;H) $ / ,%$8 )"$ $%,% % ,%$88"$ 1 & ) AA $)$% /$) , !$) / !C)$8$ ) $ $%,% 1 & ) A8 " )8)*> >'.'' .
&1 ;; ! ' ,A ) /% 8% $!/$8/ )$ / $8 8) )A %% )C! "/% $ A0/ $)!$/ / A / %% /"%AA / $ )!AA!/ ) % )/!) )$$$/ /AHG %% ) 8 $),% /$ ) " $ ; 2 ,A=C),, !8) /% %$"$$ / " !G / 8 , /%) /"%8 " )8)'>'4>'.''.'
4 ;/D$! "$%)$L!! $/,/)!/$% $)$% %%G$) ,G$) )8% $/,L/D$ $% $$ )$$8$
>
E ''EF '1G$)F+
) $+% =
! "
#$ % & #$##7$*#276142
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #248APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2,! ) %)$!/$8/ ) ?$$)8 " )8)'>' >'.''.
'.;/ ,?8$ / $$!/$8) )) )$ /$ ) / " 8%% $ 8 $ $ ) $)A 2! $ , /$ /!! ) "G$ "! "$A <$% + % /%/ B%)C$ ! ) / '* /)G$8 + "%) / )$"+% A /%$ %! , 8)$$ + $
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
1 ;$)$% $ ) /"% /%) $ % / 8"%!$/ / "% 8) /%A / " ," )$8 8/ +$ $ "$)$%$ 8 , / 8 , )%!$/ !$/%$ / $ ) 8/$,%A 6K/! / ,,!$/ / ,/!A8 " )8)1>.*>'.''.4
*1 ;<$$ $A" %$8"" !%) %G / ",)) / "$ $8G++$A8 " )8)1>.4>'.''.4
*.;/ $"$ , $ ..O88 ) ) %8 / / $$A
! "
#$ % & #$##7 *#8 " )8)1>.4>'.''
'' ;/+"% $8$ )A " "$/! "$8 % "$$ ) / % 8A C$/ /8$ )"$!/C,/ % ,%$8A8 " )8)1>.5>'.''.'
*4 ;;G$ )$$8$ ,! %) )$)$%!%) , %%,% %) !/$8/ $ 8"%% $$)$% !!/ /%$) /$ $8" /%$%% 8/ @"% /$/ 8 !/$ $ / 8$A8$ / " %)$ ) 8$ @ )D$$,$ %$8 ,/$)$% !P%) $ 88,%)!%8"A $"8 / 8$$8 $/,/) $ / 88 8$)% %%!$ "$ /$)$%$ %8) $ 8""8$%- "$@) - ) %)$-A 6 $% $/ !!/! , ,% ? /$ /"%!/$% % ,$ ,% )/8 /$A 6$%%!$$)$% $ / ,$%$ / $8) /"%!$%% % ) 8$ !!$/ /%>%) "% )$$" G/$/P!$%% $%8 " % $" !!%% $$!// 8" $)$% A8 " )8)1>.5>'.''.1
&* ; ,8 /$!%) , $%% ,$8$% %) ) $)$% !/% /$ $8" $%% 8/ 8 !/$ $ A $ %)$ ) 8$ @ ),$ %$8 ,/ %) )$)$% $ $)),%A -$ $ / "$ 88 / / %$"$$ "$ $)$% $ $ "$@) ) %)$-!%) $8A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
.5;/ %$"$) %) ) 8) $ / 8 88"")% "$% !A(G$ ! /% /" " %!$%% /G$A /$G!$/ / / !!$%% $""%A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
' ;=" , 88 88$ /"%A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
'* ; ,) $ ,))% !/ / !$A8 " )8)/$!/% $8 $$)$8%A(!!! $ !
! "
#$ % & #$##7#*#277143
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #249APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #21> .>'.''.*
&* ;$$) % $" 8/ !) 8%!G$"A /$ $ ! !$/ / 8 %% / %!/! $$ $ $ $A0)/$)$ 8$ ) %% / /$ / "G %8 %! $) /+" A "$" %! /%" ) "$" / "! " 8$ $ 8)A % / " $$$ ))$ !/// 88/ $8%$$ ,
G$+$>L%8$ $/"" 8AC ? 8$ $"8 ! )%8"$!$/ /G$) )$$8$ / )C " $$A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.5
*.;6 $% $/ !!/! , ,% ?/$ /"%!/$% % ,$ ,% ) / 8 /$A8 " )8)1> >'.''.'
1 ;)8$ / $%,$%$ % $!$%% 8,$"/ $% $"8$ ,$ // / 8""$!/% ++!$$ $ /$$A0 $%% $/ $"8 "% / ,$!/!%) , 8) % / /$$8"!A8 " )8)1> >'.''.&
.';H) @$ / % 8 $8/ %A /8""$ ) , ? / $8/ / $ ! G$%% / 8""$A % %%!% " )$ 8"$8,8G) 8" "G$$8/ ) )$8""$A % /"% "G!" ,) ) /$" / $ 8" , $%%$ %8% ,%$/" !/$8/ @ ) $8" %8%A8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
1.;%%% /%) ,,% , $ / " @A( $C/ 8""$E/ 8) 8$$ 8F$ /! %%!% ) /%)%A ) / "G )$8 / $8$))A8 " )8)1> >'.'' .
. ;$)$% 8$ $ $!) ) ) , $ /" /%>%)A8 " )8)1> '>'.''.4
'.;/ %) / "8/ /$/)$ % ) / 6 , @) /$/ ) / "8//$/E8""8$%F,$%)$ ))A / 8$%!88$) , ! ' "/ / / $"8 $/,/)!%) , )$ / $ / $!
! "
#$ % & #$##79*#)A < % / G$ ) $ $ $$8$ / $ $ % %$A 6$%%!$%!$%% % / ,%"AH$G!$ ) GA8 " )8)1> >'.''.1
'4 ;; /R$)$%S$! ,$% , /"%A <@"% / % / A / /$" ,8" "$)8 % "%A8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.
;0%$$)/8/$%)A0/ 8$$ ! %"%! /"A /$ %%!%%%@ ) ) ?"$% $" /%$ ,) " 8G$ / )"A 2% ) %%!/$ ) 8$8% 8$$"$%$A ; "$%$ ?$ /" $ !/ 8"$ $$ A /%) 8 /$ $ "$%$ ? /$8$ $ A0 %$ "H ) / 8/%%!$/ $/,!/ /$/" /" ,$A G$ 88 " %) $ ) $) G$ /$A 8 !/)$) / D ) /!%) B$) / /$8AB8 " )8)1> >'.'' .
1& ;)% /-$ !/ 8/ !$/ /$ /%) ,$ %$8 ) %)$ @88)$%A ;$"% !!/ "% ,G) " /% /%) ,D$) %8% ""E"$ "% ,) $$G$>$%)>% $F //PC/2> %%!) 88)$%A8 " )8)1> >'.''.1
.5; /$G/$)$% $ ) , $ / " %% 8)>/% $ / "$) , + 8""$ $"8A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.1
&1 ; )) /D$ 88%A /$G$)$% $,$ ) %%+$" C /%) , ) 8""8$%$ ) @) )%) 8/A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.&
.;H) $ $)$% $ ) /"% $/%) %% , 8$)) / " ) %% )/ "%$ ,8 B %) $ )$$B )/%) , ) 8/A
! "
#$ % & #$##7!*#278144
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #250APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1> 5>'.''.&
'* ;/+"% ,8"$ "?,$ $ /$ !A% ,$ $ ? / $ ) / $$ %$$ %% $" $ /"A / /%) %% )/ "%$ ) 8""8$% @A / /%) ,D$) / /$ $) D%$ $$@$8 ) 8$, K 8$%$ 8$$8" ) "$$ $,% " $8A < ) %$ /"% /%) $) /$"8 8""8$% 8/ $ ) G$ )"$$ / $"8 /%!$/ ,)$ $/,K$8A8 " )8)1>'.>'.''.
*& ; /C)/ " /$ @ /%) ,$ / 8$ )) 88)$%A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.4
.&; / ,$ ,%" /"% $ $8) $8 8""8$% 8"$ ) 88,% ,/$A8 " )8)1>''>'.''.4
&* ;/C ,/ 8""8$% $ ) /%) ,/ , ) 8/A8 " )8)1>''>'.''.4
&* ;$)$% $!/ ,)" /!/% / $) $ /%) , ) / " %)A G! /$ %!/ %$ )!G/A8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
..;@ ,) !// "! A ;G /%"$ " @$A8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
; $)E1 : F)% ,GE : F) /"!E1.:F / /)8$8"8!/! BB !$BD%$ $$@$8B ) / $8 8$, B8$$8"A /) " /" > " $/,E)%@F88$%% /$ /" + ) 8 $/,/) ) /"%E "HFA/$ ; %8% 8"E"% $8%))F!/$8/%$/$8" " /% %$%$/)A 2$ $ " / !! $ / !/ / ) ! $,% %$ /%$%$/)!/$8/ "G %$$ $ /$@$ ! > %% $,%A ; = < AAAA# (U
! "
#$ % & #$##77*#8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.'
*.;%% ! /%) / D%$/ )%$A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.&
&& ;% %M8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.5
. ;!/ %$- % "A 8" $ $8"AAAA "G / @ / "A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.
& ;/$ $ % $ ) $ $ ,$A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.
&1 ;/$ $ /)D$ !,8 $%% )) !//%$!$%% , !/ $ $ 8$) /$"$%$$ )$8A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.1
1& ;/$G/ /D$$ )!/!/ $ ") 8$% /!$ $-)A (G!/!G!$/ %!8%$ ) / ", % $ $/ /"A0 ) 8G/"!$/ % ,G $ ' % "A0$/ / "%$ "$%%$ )%%/" 8$G "G/!%% / $G $ )8)$$ !)$%!%G// ) G// )8" / 8)$$A %% % D$) / ") $ 8 "8 )/ 88 $"$ ! $%,% '* /)$/$ ,$A !%) % / / $8$/ $ "8/ $)D /)% / ! G88$ 8"%% $ $ /!%G$ "%%!/ / !" $ @)A % /$)$% / $ +8G) / /%) , $!$/ / @$$ $8A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.*
&* ;!$ !A " $ " % ,$8 )$$ / !/ ! ) %8% !GA8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.&
1 ;K%% " /" 88$%%!/ " $ ! 8$) % %$G ,$ ,?8 / "%$ %)!%)"G / $8$% ,$ $ " %8A "% / "$$ ) % !/ //$8 ) $)$$)%$ / /"% /" A8 " )8) 8) B/"B $ / "!$/ / " %$8$ $ /$
! "
#$ % & #$##7%*#279145
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #251APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #21>' >'.'' '
'4 ; %" $8" $) ) "$% $ !A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.'
&' ;$$)8 /$ /"% 8 %$G %)A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.4
4 ;$ / "G!$%% 8/M8 " )8)1>1.>'.'' '
* ;/$G%% $>/" ,$ ) $)$% )!%%$ !// $$$ $ /" !$ $ /" $) !$ $ / $ / %%D$ $"$%" $8A )C ,%$ ') /"!%$ "8/ )$% / !%) $ / " A ! $%%D$"" $ G$ $ / %$ $) / 8 %8 /G 8% 8A $ /$G/%$ /%) ) / %% ,) 8" %% )$ $//AH8% %$ $ / 8 /! ) ) , "% $% % $$8%% $" //$G/%$ /%) / B $8<$ ) $/"AB ,%$ ! /%) , ) )/$8 $ "?$ " % 8 /8) /% ) /" / !$/A8 " )8)1>1.>'.'' '
& ; ,%$$)$% $ ) $ /%) , /%) / "))D$) %)8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
11 ;$8!/ )$)$%% $) D%$ $$@$8 + % 8) /% 8/$ /$II/ ,/ )%!$/ /" $ ) "" " / 8) ) ">,G>!!$%% $) $!$/ %/$ $ $"8 / 8""$A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
&1 ;(8$) / ,/ /$/" ) /%) , ,% $A 6 / / /%" ) / $8$ $ /$/8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.5
* ; %) 8$, R8$$ 8"S$ $$A $ % "A $)$%% ,$ $ !A K/ $ /G 8$$ )G)/!G8%,%A
! "
#$ % & #$##74*#8 " )8)1>1 >'.''.&
.;0/$$8%% / /) "%% /% ) %) $ $/,/) %% $) ,%8G $8%)$ / /)!;$H) ;%% $, ) A ;$- "!A$/,/) $ "$@) 8) $ /% $ "% /$ ) $%+"$%$)$%A /!$/,/) $-) %% / I8 " )8)1>1 >'.''.5
* ;$ ! /%) , ,% )!/ /!!$/ /$$$$8 $" $ 8$A8 " )8)*>. >'.''
&.;!/$/ ) /%) 8$ / / $ )!/ /!A ! %)$ @A % $$%$G/ $ ,) /% !/$8/ %% $8AH$"$$$!$%% "G % 88$,% / %!%//%!$%% 8$%$ $ % 8"$$ $"A % /% > %) 8 88"") % "$% !/! $ / %% /A!%) , /" 8 /$ $"$%$!/! /$ A !%) $%% %$"$ /@$8 /!/ 8 ),/"/ !/$8/ $ "%% %$8 / %$A8 " )8)*>. >'.'' '
'* ;/"$)$%% /%) , ) / "! %) $A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.&
'1 ;/ ,/ % %% $" / / $" )!/ /)$% $8%)$ A "$ $)$%%!$/"G8, "@$) )8I8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
.'; / @) / " ) / ,$) , / " G$)) )>2%A8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' .
..;/ "$8$ / % )$,% $$ $ % ,8"A8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' .
;/!%) " %$G)$8$"$$ ?)$ 8/ A/$G/ 2 8/ ,$%)$ /%) / /$% % $ /$ 8 / A8 " )8)*>.'>'.''
*.;(8 % / / ,%!,8G /"% $ ,$ )$, %) ) / ) % , / "%A
! "
#$ % & #$##78*#280146
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #252APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)*>.'>'.'' '
'5 ; / , -$ ,) & ) )) /8 8"%%A ! 8% $ $ %$,$%$ $ ) , ) ,% )%$ %%%!//$ , /% $,,%A ; % ) ! /% $$$8%% $ C8"$!$/ 8/$%) ) ) /%$C ? !G,%A / $$ $ $) $ $ / 8 , ") %8% %% ) ,%" 8 , "), $"$ %$ / "" !A % %$$ $/,/) / C" / "% ) / ,%" $ / $/,/)A / %) ! "//$/8/%)$ / !8/$%)A($)%A8 " )8)*>.'>'.''.
.4;(8 / ,/ %)$ / 8$ 8 " )8)*>.1>'.'' '
. ; ! " $ /%% $" ,$ ) ! /$ $8 " 8$% 8$ $8"8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.
' ;8) ) /%$A ) ) /% / " )/%) , ) /A8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.&
&& ; % 888 @ ,$ $) ,/ /%) A/ $%% )$ ) %A ; B$)$%B $%%/ 8) /%A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.
*5 ;(8!8$))$ "88 ) %% /%), $%,% A8 " )8)*>.*>'.'' '
1 ; /%) , 8$!/!G$8$%$$88""$ $ )$ $8$ )) % A C!//$ 8 $ ,) A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
' ;U "8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
&& ; )K"G)$8 / /"!$ " )$K/ "8 " )8)" %8) $ / 8)) , /
! "
#$ % & #$##7**#*>.*>'.''.*
. ;) /,$D% $A0%%$$ D%$ @$8 ) G!%),% 8 %!)$ /$A0%$) '*>4 $8 ) / $"E) +$ F G8$ $ /%) /$A K /") $ '& ) / /) $ 8" /! $"")$ 88A / "$ $ $ %! /! /A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
' ; % / 88) / / ,) /+" . &.%$ A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.&
*4 ;/ ,/ $) )) $8 / $ ) $$%$AH) ) !G!%% "$%$!$/ 8/$%)!/) ) ! / "$$ @)) '!GE:>+F) ,$%% " 8%A / %$ $) 8$ %! / "$$ ) , %) ) !$%%$ /"A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
1* ;/ " ", % 8 $ $!//$ $ / !A2!) /$ 8/ $8 $"8I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
&& ; ) !/ / $% "$% / ) 8) /%) ,) )$%AH / 8) 8$$ $" /$!%8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
' ;/ /%) , 8$)) / " + )8$% 8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
&' ;2% / "8/ )$>,) ) / ) G$>8%A ; $8% / G$$8$ )8$ 8 $ $ !%%A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''
&4 ;$ /$G/ )$$8$ /%) , ,! $% "$%$)8 )"%$ $ $A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.1
'* ;6$$ $ $" / 8/8) 8%/! )8""$8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.*
&5 ;(8 $K)$8$"$
! "
#$ % & #$##%$*#281147
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #253APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
.4;(8 "! ) 2 /%!/$8/ $ )$ $ ) /%) ,) 8/8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
1& ;)8"") /! )$$ ,! 8""8$%%8$ )E@ %8) $ ;( #$%% ;)FA( #$%% $ G$ % 8"$ )$ )% G$ ) ,$88%% 8A "%% 8$ / 8$A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.*
&1 ; / $ 8 %$G %)>/% / ) %%!/ "%% ) %!//%8 " )8)*>. >'.''.&
* ;!%) , %" $"$,% % /$A ))$$ 8$%!/$ / " !$ ) " $" % )"!GA=!%) ) /) ,$%$8V8/ A /$!%) , $,% $ " $$A% / 8)% ) ,$ %$G%/%A ) %$-!/ ! G$/8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
&& ;) /"% $ ? /A0//$C )%"$% /" 8) $ ,$%)$ + $C 8""8$% "C /"A @ $ %$G//"8""8$%%)$A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.4
'5 ;(8 !/%),,%! /$ ) / $ 8%%) , A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.
&' ; ) , /"! 88) 8""8$%$ ) $% )$ )$"$ 88$ )"" / 8)+/% $A 2" %% )K ? 8"$ 8% 8$%8)A %$G %) $$ %$,%W,$K! /$/" ) 88)D$ "$$$ )) $$) ) $)$ @8%% $D %$$ @$8 ) $8 )>"$A 2$ 8""8$% 8$$!%) $ " $! G8G ", $%,% /" %!%) ,8"8"$8A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.1
* ;/ , ) )$8 $/)$$ ? %$$88A )!%%$ $ )!%%$ $ )!%%$A "$ !
! "
#$ % & #$##% *#$ $ $ ) !>% / " " $8 )$8$D$)A 8 $$$ "$/ 8% !8A / % )$8 %$) , $ $"% A/! %) $ " "D%$ @$8 )8$%$$ 8$$ 8"A / %% "!)A8 " )8)*> >'.'' '
1 ;/+"% /%) , 8$)) ,$ ) 8"%!$// "%$ ,$A !$ ,$ /" ) 8%$"$ $ ,$ !%) / 8"%!$/ 8$%$E@"%
88!G$" /$/" %8 ,$!%) / 8 @"%FA $"$%% 8" /%) / /8$ G!$ / / )$))!$/ / "$8 /+" $ $ %) / $/+" %)$A
>
E *EF G$)F+
) $+4
. -
- ; <
; ;
,
1 ? @ -
2
; 1
?4@ ;
2 ; / 0 &:/ & A$)$% $/,/) $) / ),'A 1 "H $)$% $/,/)1A. ) $)$% $/,/)1A&*0 ) $)$% $/,/)1A&5;$@)+ 6$$8E@
;$ F*A1 H) 6$$8*A4*6!! &A .
!"
! "
#$ % & #$##%#*#282148
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #254APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2+8 . - 2
2
2
&
$8 ) G$/ )0$%)%$ $/,/) "8E@
$ !)$F$"@ <$E@A
@ 8 % )H)$ @ "$8FH H8% 2$ "$$ )$$%H)$ $ !/E% 8$F+
$#$9$!$7$%$4$8$*$ $$ $8#!7*7784 ** 4%8
"
!
#$ % &'
! "
#$ % & #$##%9*#+* = < 2 ;
- -
;
&
@)) ) 6$$$)H)$()( !8) @ 8) 8"$8 8$$; #$$!/E% 8$F+
#$!$%$8$ $$ #$ !$ %$ ! 9 * 9 # 7
!
#$ % &'
! "
#$ % & #$##%!*#283149
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #255APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)'>'4>'.''.
* ;0/!%) %%!8%%) /"% $ 8""$III 0/!$%%)8 8""$II" ) $HH C /%) , %%!) 8/$ $" /"%A % $" $ ? %$G / 8G"G + $G !$/ $"A , %)%) $) $ /!%% ,$ / 8""$ % /$$" $ A / /8 8/ / /"% !$%% ,,% ,) , / $! /$$G GA 2$ $8 "$/ 8%%)!/$8/ 8%) , ,%8% ,A % !/ / ,$ / ,$ 8%%) /"%$" %!$%% ), , /A /!$%% )A C$" G!,8G) "G $ 8""$A8 " )8)'>'4>'.''.'
4 ; A 2!) / $/, % , $I'A 2!" ,) ")$%,% / , ", $$,) 88"")$ $ ) !/ 8I1A 6 / !>)D$8G% 8"%$L8! /$% )$,$ ,/$,$)$$)%// /$,$$ ,) !/ %!% 8$$I*A2!8!D$ / 8""$ ,$ ) ,)I&A 2!"8/ $" )$)$% /"! ) $ /$ /") /!"8/ $" $) I A 2!" /"! $$ $ )" 8/ / /$8 ) ;$8"I4A0/ $ / @ ,$ / $ ) I A / $ %!8"D$ / ,)%$ $$)$) %%I5A / ,$ , $)$% /" "$%$I .A0/ % !/8/$8 )!/8/ / % !/ $ / 8 8/8/$8 )!/ /%) , G) / 8I/G 6$$)8 " )8)'>' >'.''.
'.; / %$8 $ %8I / $ /$@I /)IE$
!/ $ / 88,%$ /%I /$)$% $%,% %$,% )$IFA ; ;;
= / )8%) $ $ & / B/%$ $ / )$!//+"% 8 @$AB /$ $ $% 88A /9 8) HH= )$ -$ $ /$ !!// /"% "$)A 2!, $/I+ $ 0- ; - &
' '
1 >
. ;
! "
#$ % & #$##%7*#8 " )8)'>' >'.''.'
' ;$ /! D$ /!" /" ) %%$" $"%!$/ ! % / / ) /!"$" /") 88$%%I8 " )8)'>' >'.'' .
14 ;0/ 8 8% %$8) /"% /)$ 6 $ $ /" @8)$ 1 &..D I8 " )8)1>.'>'.''.
1 ;0/!%) , / % $ @ )$% $ /"%$8) 8/ / !% ,% $$ I)/!) / % $"8 K ,) ) )%" %I8 " )8)1>.1>'.''.
&1 ;02 ;U 2 ;H 2 $ % $"% $% / # 26A 2!8! /% /"+", %$%% % / %% /"! " %%!!$/G$ $ 8A8 " )8)1>.*>'.'' '
'1 ;0/ /$ )!/ /%$I0$%% @$ " " ),% /$I ) /M8 " )8)1>.*>'.''.4
*1 ; $) !/!$%% %$"% , /% 8$IC)% / 8/$ 8 !"$/!%%% $ G$ !/$8/ 8%) @$ / 8$A @ C"%$$) , /!/% /$A0/ / /$ ),!$/ /"$"I0/ ) ) /@/)) / 8$!/!/ $ / ) $ $)$,%I8 " )8)1>.&>'.''
1 ; / % / 8"%$$ $) I8 " )8)1>.&>'.''.
. ;!/ / %!/G! %$% , / ,$8 !/") $ /
/ %% " , "$$(,(!)8 " )8)1>. >'.''.'
*& ;!%) / %%$)$% /"% /%) % ,$,% )/ %%!$%
A $)$% )1.) $ %/A 'A $)$% $ 8 % ,) 8 $ $ %/ ,! 1.)) '"/A1A%$"$/!" 88 $ 8/) $ 8 //"$" ))$ / $- /$)$% $A8 " )8) A0/ /%)C / ,$ /$$/)) /
! "
#$ % & #$##%%*#284150
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #256APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #21>. >'.''.*
4 ;,%" / 8I'A0/)G )8 /$ , $ ) /I1A0/%% ,$I8 " )8)1>.4>'.''.4
*.;!%) G )$%% )! / ", ) 8%$8/!" !/ $/,/) )!/ $ "$ ) /!A8 " )8)1>.4>'.''
'' ; %$8)A8 " )8)1>.4>'.''.1
.;9A K / ,$!/ "! )!$//% A8 " )8)1>.4>'.''.*
* ;!%)! )) /!/"% / $"8)/)$$A C /) @"% / % (8% / , B/%%!) B , )$%8$ %8%$) / $!/ ,) %$ $ " $/,/)A /$G$!%) ,!/!/$% )) / $"%$8$ /,$ $ %8!///,"%A8 " )8)1>. >'.''.5
&5 ;2!$W%$8KK/ %$8$ $ %8I D$/! $ " $ "$$"" / $ 8""$ $8!$/$ / !A8 " )8)1>.5>'.''.'
*4 ; A0/ / )$$P$8$ 8%% /$P/%$I'A 2! / )$$ $ $"8 /%8% 8">,$I1A 2!8! /% "@$"$-8$%)$ @ $8"!/$% 8$ / %$%$/) ) % =$)I*A /%)! 8$)8$)$8$"$ $8 % !!/ / $8""8$%-E H P + F ;$@) -E; F)H)$-EHFI&A /%)!8$))/$$%% ! '>1 >' ,@"" $,%$$ $% $"8 % $"$)>!I A 2!8! )8$) " %)$@/%)) ),% /$I8 " )8)1>.5>'.''.1
&* ;+/%) "$ , $) % !!// $ 8""8$%- %)$- ) "$@) I+2!8$ %)$ @ , "@$"$-)!/$% 8$ $)%$%$/) ) %I+0/ @8% ,$ //%), / )$$ ) !/ )I+2!8!8$$8%% $%$- ) ) , %)$ @ )
! "
#$ % & #$##%4*#,$ %$8 )% % " ) ),% /$%$I+/%) ! '>1 >' , )/)$ , @" " $$ 8 ) 8%+$"$)>!I+2!!$%% /$$ 8 %% %8%,$ ) / 8" $ I8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
.5;0/ % , /$MI %!) %$G /$ $!%) 8 " /" ! %% /$/"A /$!$%% % % ! 8/$ >!" "$% 8$A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
' ;! $ @ " %% /% $" ) " !!/ /$$ /$!A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
'* ;0/ $ $IH8% $$A G/ G$ 8 /% ,$%)$ " ),% /$A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.*
&* ; /$ %%A 8C$ !/ /$ / ))% ,8" ,$)%A $ @$A +$">G$ %$>/%!G/ %! 8"%$) / /$ $ ),%A %$) !" "!G !/ ! !%% ,8 $! "),%A /$G/ $ 8$% /%) , 8) //$A8 " )8)1> .>'.''.&
4 ;$ !/ ,%" $%I$ ! ))$8 ) G$ / )C %%8 "8/ / 8G$ $8G %A </" $ ! @!/ "$ $8 ) G$ / 8/ /" "%$+) $/ G$ A( // /$ $ /% )C / ,%"
$C , $ @ $)!$/ $ /!C$8" E8/%$ %F ) $ 8$%G)/,8GAAA!%) / ) " /M8 " )8)1> .>'.''.&
* ;/!8!"G $ E$F / @$$ %)$>/$%$$)/$$ ,$ /$8%$%!$/ )$/ 8"%"/"% $) / ,$ "$$ " "%" ,$ A ) /!8)/!$/ 8/$ )"$8%% / 8/8) % / 88""$I0)C! " /% 8$%% ,$ /% %$G 8/$/% $ A / /+" %$ $) % $, / 8"A8 " )8)0/ 8/ " / D %% /
! "
#$ % & #$##%8*#285151
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #257APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #21> .>'.''.
;8 " )8)1> .>'.''.4
&* ;2!)! / $ %% %$ $ %$) 8 !%8"$P !/ $$!%% $/" !!/% / $8" 8 /$8"$8!%% ,$I8 " )8)1> .>'.''.
& ;0/)/!G%$/G8%I8 " )8)1> .>'.''.5
*.;2! / )$$ $ $"8 / %8%8"I0/ $ 8) $% ) $$% , /)$$I8 " )8)1> >'.''.'
1 ;0/ $) $ $$$ %$8$ /!$%% /$G/ %8%8" ) / "$) // /$ G%%!/% ++! $$$) /$"$%$I8 " )8)1> >'.''.&
.';2 )$) / % ) /!/ / 88%)) /"% GD$" D%$ G$!I8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
1.;2! 8 / %! / %) $ %8A / "$%! %$G)%/%!A ) ?, 8") /8$$A8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
* ;/$ ) %$G" /% D/ 8"$$ /8$"A /$%$%/$$%,%$! / $)!/ !%) , %G$ %$"$ A /%,%" $ ! $ / )%2!/ $ $$) %% /),% ) %8 )%8$ /"!$/ $8"%88$ $A % $" $) $ $ /" /!/$ / , %%!) /A ",)/$) 8") $$!$/ /$ ,$ /% $ / ) ) % ! /) % N ..GA8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
&& ;2!8 / 8$ ) 8""$!G/ )$$,! / !!/ ,/ %% "G$!$/ $$ )$ / %8%% )$ $"/I% !$/ "% /$ / /!8 / 8$ $ "% /$ % ,$I!%) 8$% 8$))$ /$ %$ $8G $8
! "
#$ % & #$##%**#/8) " /% )G$$E$ !/" / 8",$) ..$8FA0/ /%8 , )) /$ ,%"!$/ $%,% I2!8/ 8$!G !$/ /" ,/ %% "G$ "G/ $ / 8""$I2$/@ /!/C!) , "!/ ) $" $ / 8""$I2$/@ /!/!C$) / 6 $%% ) $" /!/ ,%I / ,$)$- "% /$ $ 8/% 8A8 " )8)1> >'.'' .
. ;!/ $ $ G8 %% / 8$%IBH8%B"% / / %$ )!$%!) /I8 " )8)1> '>'.''.4
'.;0/ $ ,/$) /$ / ) /!"8/ " ) / ) $A8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.
;!%)
AHG / ,$ /"% $ ))$$ /8/%%A "$) "$% %$ /"!/!8$A0 ? $" "8/ " $ /"!$/ %%$$ G$8/ ) "%$% ,)"A $ % "8/ "),% ) , ,% 8G"% ) $A0 % ?%$$ %8% %$ $ /" ) $ /%>%)A 'A )) /8/%% /"%!$/
A <$@A ,A 888%$"$$ ,) / ", ,)"A 8A )D G$$E/! /$!%) % ) , 8)!$/ %) $!!/$8/ ) %% $) G$ %% /$FA)AD$$'*>4 "" $8 $ )") 8A/)$% )!$%)%$ ! " %% $$ $8%)$ ,/ /%>%) ) /"% A8 " )8)1> 4>'.''.4
*1 ;0/ ))$$% $"8 ) / 8%% 8 8$ 8I0/)$8 ) $ "G$/!$ %$ //"$$I8 " )8)1> >'.''.4
..;//%$ !/ )$ /$I / $ $)G! / /"% $8$ $8E/ $!G 8"$ ! ) %$ / ) / )F/$ "%A =!$%% / 8 " )8)1> >'.'' '
'.; ) ) /$ $8M
! "
#$ % & #$##4$*#286152
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #258APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1> >'.'' '
' ;2!/ /8""$$ )%!$/ /$ )!/ %$ /, 88%A8 " )8)1> >'.''.'
1& ;+0%) / /$ 8$$ !/ )!! 8$ $$8$%% $% % ))8 / ","$) $ $/,/)I2!"8/ $ $%%$"%$ 8"I $!/ )$%8$ 8""$I+0$%%/D%$%$,$"8)$ " " )$$%R%) S$)$% $/,/)I+0$%% $ "$$8""$ $IE/$ $ $8 / /%%+$"$) %G$ ,F+0/!$%% $ 8 / 8$ "/+"%) 8)$8%) /+"%EAA $8) $8 $ + G$ %$$ !$%)%$ 8FI+0/ ,%$8 $ ) $ I+2!)!G /+"R88,%SI8 " )8)1> >'.''.'
*4 ;/%)!$ 8 )$ / ,$8!%% , $ $ //$8 " )8)1> >'.''.1
.5;0/ $ / $$ $ !/$8/ " $%$"8 8""$ 8/8// $)$ " ,$I8% % $%$-$ / ,$%$ /$/" 8)$8" / /$/ )C $ " "/I / !) ,HH ) $8/ % 8 $8/ /@ / 8""$A8 " )8)1> >'.''.
1 ;!%) "$ /+"%8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.5
. ;0/ ! 8$ %$G / 8%%I/ $/ !$8/8) $8A = ,$ /"8"%%!%),)$8% " , $ ! "$%$ /$ %8 $ " G " 8"$8 ) 8%%)$$A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.
** ;0/!%)! %%!!G$ 8% "$%!/ 8/ , "G /" /E/, G$ 8) "%/$ $F @ $8" ,$ /$ $ /$I8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.
&' ;!/ $ ) ,%$ ") "$88/ %$"$I
! "
#$ % & #$##4 *#8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.&
.;!%)! %$ ,%$/) "/ $ / %8% ! %% / !%%/+"% $ ) /)) / $A !%) "G $8%) %% /! " 88)!$/ 8/ / / 8 /$),/$) ,$ "A !%) %! %$ / " @ /! $) , %% / ! 8/ /"%A$ !%) %$ 8/ ! " / / 8 /$),/$) ,$ "A8 " )8)1> 5>'.''.&
'* ;0/ $/ 8 , %$) /+"% / / /%) $ 8"%$8!$/%$ % "$) ) /$/ @A % !/ 8% 8 , $ %8 "$$ / $"% $"8!/$8/ $8%) G$ $ G$ )! $ %%AH$,$%$ $ ) ,)))!/>$ $ )")A8 " )8)1>'.>'.''.1
& ;/"% @) $ / "! %)$ $8%)$88"")$ @I2!$ /"% @ $%$-) /8$) $"8I8 " )8)1>'.>'.''.
*& ; /! $8 /$ %8% $) ))$ "% $$I8 " )8)1>' >'.''.
'& ; $ $ 8$))$ " /$$/I8 " )8)1>' >'.''.'
'' ;6 / 8$, / 8""$ ) / )$"% /8""$ ) / / %$ / %% $"A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.*
' ; $ %) ,$% ) $ $ " %$% /" /" /$)!$)/8""$A / % ") $ / G$ %% + A " ..O% $/!$/ $%)%$A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.4
.&; / $ $ $/,/) -) %)$I8 " )8)0/!$%% , ) , / % /$ %8% $8!G
! "
#$ % & #$##4#*#287153
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #259APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #21>' >'.''.4
*.;, $ ) 8$$ $$)$% $/,/) ,$8) $8 $"8 ) , / 8$ , ) /!$%)%$I8 " )8)1>''>'.'' '
1 ;0/ ,$ ) $ / 8""$P,)$$$ %$ $I0/ ) ) /% $/,!$/ $PG$ $8I%$$ 2!) $/,/) ) /% ) 8 / 8$$8 " )8)1>''>'.''.*
11 ;0/ / $ $ 88$ $ / , !/!%) 88 " $8 $ %",$ /$8 8"A / !$ !%)C , ,% % " / 8"$ / %% ,A $)/) %$ $ / 8%) 1 ) $ $% )$$ $) " / 8%)C $) $@ //A0 / ,$% 8""$ !/! )C / / ,$ $8 8 %% $ % % / ! .. ...D ) /)%"A0!$/ $% / ) ,G@)$ )G ,$%)$ "!G8 $A8 " )8)1>''>'.''.
&5 ; $ %) !/%") + %)$ /$ "$"A0/!%)!"$ " ) )$%I8 " )8)1>''>'.''.4
&* ;2!8! / / /"% $%8$ / %) /$$8 %8% %% $" /$ "G $ " ,/ $%,$%$ ) 8I8 " )8)1>''>'.''.4
&* ;/%) / , 8 /!" /"% %%!) $I/%) /,8!//"% / % "$ $E%8"!$/ %8% / ) /") $ ) "8/F, / 8D%$ /"%I8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.4
'1 ;8%) / % " $)$$)% !!/ /) /$%8 AH$"$ %$"$ /HH 8!)8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.
5 ;6 ""G / %$ / " 8"$8%% ) 8$%%%,% "",8""$ ,!8 " )8)1>'1>'.''
.'; )$" 8$ ) !$ / / ,/$ )!% /A!$/ /!G / ,$ $8)
! "
#$ % & #$##49*# / %% " / ,$ /!$%% A /$ $ ,$ %)!$/ /$ / ) %8G A //$% $ )) ) / /)$"$)$!G // / $ ,/ A / $ ,8 /%8G ),% /$A % G$8 $ %$ /$ $ G!$$ ,% )$ / G$ %$ / "/$" , )A %$ / / $ ,$ %% /$ ?$ "G ) " , % /$%%!$ $ ! / ", ? ", /$%) ) "/$ )) / ,%"A8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
..;0/ !$ 88"%$/ $ )$% )!/ 8$ "$/!G /!$%% /% 88"%$/ / %I8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
;0/ /8) > %%/8%$") ,%" / )!$%) %$ 8A C"/8$$%) $!/$8/ 8%) ,,% , %)!$/ "$8"!/$8/ ) $8%) 8/ !$) G/" ,/A8 " )8)1>'1>'.'' '
1* ;/; ,8" "8/$" /!$%%G / /"% "$ " $ / 8$ )$ /$$/, ) $/,/)A / %$8 6A 8 , /)% " % ") /"%$A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.
&5 ; /$G$ $ $" 8%% )$ / ,%" )K/$G/88$% / )D% $8%) / 8% ,%" !/$8/ $ ) $$!/ $ $) 8%%) %$A /88$% $ %$G% / "$% 8/ // /$8 ,!$%% " %$G% 8 %/A8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.'
*.;!/ 8"%$ ) "I!/ $ /$% 8 ?, $ %$"$) /"I/!" )!/8%$%!%) % $ %$"$)$)$%%I8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.*
*' ;0/ $ ",%$/I8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.&
&& ;0/ $ /$ 88!/ / ! /$,%$/" $ $ $M
! "
#$ % & #$##4!*#288154
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #260APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1>'1>'.''.
* ; %%) /$ <( " /8"")/2%$% $ / )TR"?$ D$ )!$/ $%%$ )%% )""!$%% , $ / $/ >#8$ /" "G $ / %) 8""$$A/$@$ $ $"%A /$ $ %A 8$$A ""$$ %$G ", $ )(8G$)!$%% $$ $ % @$%%A / % ) )) $8"A /!$%% / "$$"" @ ) ,$8 "$8A )!/ / 8""$$ /$/) /$ $) /" / ,$ / ")% $ %A $% / / $!$%%,$%,% // 8" /$HC )$)A " %) / / % $ ,$%%$ )%%$ %)S/$ $ / / /$ 8" $ /$ $ ) G / /,$8A2!)! "$$/ / R/ H$%S!/! $ $ %% //$/ ,$))I 0/ ) / ) I0/ /%)! %% ?%%+) %%!,8"/"G/!%/I/ $ / %!" /$ / ) ) ,8" %$A 6 8 , /$ ,) " $ )@ $ /$ ! "I0/ ,D%$ %$ ) ? / /$/ ,$))IK,8"$D$ T8 " )8)1>'1>'.''.5
. ; /! %$"$ C ,$ "", )HH 8A "/!$)$ !/ / "",/HH !/$8/!%) , / " A ", " 8 % !1% $A /$ $,$%$I8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.
. ;;D$ $ )!/ /$G//$/ )$8!/ " 8 8 )!$/ /$/"A @ / 8$$88% / 8 8!/))$$% 8 $8)"$$ !$/ / ) !/@$8 "$/ ,))A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.
& ;6 / $/ $$ $ )/8$$I8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.
&1 ;!%) % G8$ 88$% 8$)!/$/" $ ) /!" %$8 /%) , %%!) $ /$- ) $/,/) 8 /%/ ,%8 /8""$A8 " )8)0/!$%%! 8/ " $" ,8G
! "
#$ % & #$##47*#1>'*>'.'' '
& ;)$$I%!/ / , /,$8) % ,$ ') ) 1) /" / )K %$ /%%$") 8$, / %8% 8" %% $"A " / /$/$) , ,8 )%" ) ) 8)%%,8 / !8K )/$ @A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.1
1& ; ! "", 8$ 88$% !%) $ GD$ "$)$% ) %8% ,%$8 ,$ "$" "8 ,$A /$"$) "!/ %%$) %$"$ <!$/ ,%$8 $$/ $ / "$))% / $/ $%/ ,%$/) / $8% ) %G!$ , $A $)$ )$,$!/ %8) / ,%$8 ) !$/ %% 8A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.*
&* ;/!)!"G $ $!/$ CA/!8!8 "?,)G 8" $A!/!%) , $ /"I;G A8 " )8)1>'*>'.''.&
1 ; %$"$$ %8)/"% "G$ $ )$,% $,% ! 8$$ /" /!) % 88"") / )") %)$ ) $"!/$8/"G8/$% / %8% 8"I2!!$%% / 8$ ,,% 88"") "$%$ %$ // 8 $)) /%"!$/ G$)I8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.
* ;2!)!! 8%%8$ @ " %% /"I2!)! ,%8 / ) 8""$!$/ / )$ $ 8) /"A8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.
& ;+!!/! / "$ /%) / 8!$/ $$ ) , / $ A +!/%)/ 8$% , $8 / 8" /$ / ,) )'* /A +! /%) / % "!G ) $ $ $8 $ $ $ HH2 ;M!$/ "$) $ 8AAA 8"$ A8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.4
.&;6$" + ,$AHG "% ) @"% ,) 8 " )8)1>'&>'.''.
.1; ,%$ / $ /%)D$%%!!/! /$/" E/%+"F % %$$A /
! "
#$ % & #$##4%*#289155
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #261APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2 /%) , @) /%A / $ /%) %$"$ /%$$ $ $/",$ 8 8$$8$/,/)A8 " )8)1>' >'.''
* ;!$%%$ )!/ $ 88 / %$% )+)$)$% $/,/) )!$%)%$I8 " )8)1>' >'.'' '
'4 ;2! "@$"$- / ,$ / 8$ CA8 " )8)1>' >'.'' '
*& ;$8 / )"$8 / /$ "G / , 8-)! / / $"8 %8 , ) %8 E/ ),%FA / ),$%$ /$ / %!,$+!/$8/ $!/ "% /$ 8" ,A / %$ ,$%)"),% /$ $ $C)! %%IC"/%$ /"% $ / %$A " 8/ "G / /%) , ,% $ / %!$/$8$A8 " )8)1>'4>'.''.
'* ; $% / 88$ /!/+"% G$ $! " ),% /$A / $8!$)8) $8"%% ),% / !GA $ 8$%)% ) 8 % /$ %!GA/ / ) )$$8% $)!G $ / / ) / G$/$%%$)$8%8$ / %8G $,%%$ $ %$ % "%A % /$ +% /$ !$%% , % /$ / ) /% $8 ) G$,%"A8 " )8)1>' >'.''.&
' ;6 / / ,$ /$$/,I8 " )8)1>'5>'.''.4
1 ;/!)!D$ $ 8$)) $ /$ 8I8 " )8)1>'5>'.''.5
;0/ / 8$$8 88 $"$))I2!8% ) / 88I8 " )8)1>'5>'.''.1
& ; %/ , )$% $ & / /)B B 8"%$ , " A ,%$ / ", B$$8B 8"%$ "$$"%A/% /%) % ,) , %!$) ) / 8) 8)8!
! "
#$ % & #$##44*#" ,$) ,A $,, ) #(!$%% G/8$!/ / / / $ /"A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.4
4 ; $) /"% !/ $)%% /% /!G/"AA 8%$ $8 "$8 " " ,) 8A($!$%% /)! ,8 / " % $$$!%) ) ,$%%M8 " )8)1>1.>'.'' '
'4 ;2!! )$$ !I2!"8/ $8 "G, / 8/8) "G$C! )$)EH>%FA / / $)$$)% / 8$,/%/$, / ! /%) / / $>)%/ ?! /$$" )!$%% "$ / 88$%/$ $ ) !/ /! ) )%$ $A8 " )8)1>1.>'.'' '
* ;!%) G !/ ,%" !$ % 8""$) !IMI)/8 '1,%" $)$$) / !%) // )M "% )A !%) %GB$!)$)XXXXXX$ %$AAAA /!) / 8)$ /$>% 8/ $% ! ! "G ! "% /$ ! %% $"$) $"$) G$$ " / $8 8$ $8 ) , )) /!8$$8%$!$%% 8G) 8 ) $!AB8 " )8)1>1.>'.'' '
& ;!/ ) /$G/%),@"" $ "$ )2 % $$)$% $/,/)A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.
&& ;0/,$$/! 8" !/ 8K )/ 8 /%I%% $8" /%) / 88 /$ ! ) %% ! "!//%$/%),,% / /$/ 8 %$$ /,$ /$8) /" $/ )$A $ !$ , /$8/ % / )K!/!$/%$8" %% 8" A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.'
' ;2!" /"% 8%% 88$ /0 )A /!" / %$8 , /!" 8%% ) @A 2!" / !/") % / 1.) $"I8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.'
1.; /! $8$ ! 8/$ %8%!G8 /"%I
! "
#$ % & #$##48*#290156
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #262APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
11 ;0/ $ 8 / $ $$I0/$ "$ / $!// $I $8) , !I0/ "G /$G%! ) / 8$ )!$/ $%$ !GI8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
14 ;<" / $8% C) ) / "$ / %$) $ "/ $ 8$% $ "!$) , /"% ) / % "% /$A 2!$%$ /"% $ )) $ $%,% "% ) / /$8$$I / %$ /$/$/ /",$ / /$/%% $ "% $ / %%!) /" ,$I%% )C/$GA %% /" / 8C /" , 8 1.)E%" $N.$ @F/!"8/%@$8"!$%% / 8$%I0/ $ / ", /"% $/ $ I $C '% $ !!!%) ? ) '+ "/% ) @A 2!8! / @ $)" /"% /%!$/ / /$ 8$$I8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
&1 ;/" /$ /%) , $8% 1.) "$$""8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.1
&5 ; $
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
! "
#$ % & #$##4**#8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.*
;2!) $8) /+"% "G/! ,%8 %$I/ / /%" ) 8) 8%$%,%I2!" "$$ 8 %8% $8E$AA G$ ! %8$8 $) 8 $8 8IF8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.4
;0/ $ )$$$ R")S/" 8$%A8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.
&5 ;2!8!,$ ! 8$%% /!/ )$% $8"I8 " )8)1>1.>'.''.5
* ;/"$ " %$G%!$%% ")/$; ) "D$8G% )!$%% %%!"$ 8" $ !/!$%% , " $ !/8"AH "$!$%% 8 /$)$ ) /$ /K/% G$ ,))$ $ /$8K8"!A8 " )8)1>1 >'.'' '
;/$ G) /!D$ ) 8%% /- $$ G$ %$ / ,%"A ) %% ?! $/ 8""$ $ / 8$ ) 8$ /$ ),8%A % + ) /$G/ 8$ /%) $8G% -$ $/,/)A ;8 $ / ",4 %% / $/,/) $ A8 " )8)1>1 >'.''.&
.; " )$) , $ ) %$"$ /" "8$ " %$$ !%/ 8%+)$ 8""$ $I%$"$ !$%% / %) "$))% 8% ,,% ) / /$/ /%" 8" G$ )8 $ I%$"$/ !$%% / /"%$+$ "$%$!/ / )!! 8) )) ) / 8%$ 8 8$ /$"$%$I0/ " ?)$!/ /%! )!$/ /$% % / 8"%$!$/ ) %8%%!I0/ ! )$8$ /$ $!/ / / " "";$8"I8 " )8)1>1 >'.''.5
* ;/$!$%% % ),% /$ $$A %$ $%%$) ) $"$%" / /%) ,$A ) $ /8) ,%$,% $ $, $ / 8""$A ,) $ %% ))$ /$8) /" .O+'&O /$%% !/$% ,$ ,% /" ,8 /
! "
#$ % & #$##8$*#291157
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #263APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2%$A /$ $ $%% 88$) $ 8A ;G "G )I/ 8""$$ )% ) /$ !)/"I/" A 8) /"!!/ 8%% /$$ ) "$" /"E%$G" " 8) /" !$ ) )D$ ,$ $" $F %% )) $ /" ' "/ N' ... "/E!/$8/ "! 8 /"FA! ) % ),% /$ $ , ,$%)$ "/$ $8G$ 8) /"! ) $" !A /$ $ G$ $ 8 /$ %! ) !%) @8$ %% 8$ " % $ /$A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.5
&& ; " $ %% /"%8 " )8)*>. >'.''
'.;6 / !K/8>"/ %%+$"$) $ / $/,/)I0/ ,$) / %$8!$%% 8% @$$ 2I8 " )8)*>. >'.''
' ; %$" ) / G$$!$%% )"$8%% 8 88" /!$I8 " )8)*>. >'.'' '
'* ;2!8! 8 / ) %$8$ /"% / D% %)$%I8 " )8)*>. >'.''.&
'1 ;!%)! G!/!/8""$$ ))$ /$,%" ) %G 0 0HHA8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
.';0/ ) / ) , %$"$)I% / $/ )!/ /!!$/ /$A / 2 %%! /" !/ /%) / $$8 /"AI8 " )8)*>. >'.''.4
*.;$" / /%)C , %%!) !/A / ,$D$ $,%8$ /" III8$% %$"$!%) $"@ , $,% / $ 8D8 A8 " )8)*>.'>'.''.5
1 ;2!"8/ $8 )!/ $ $ 88,%I!%) / /%!/ $$ ) G/"% 8 % !$8 "8/ %%$ /!/ $ /% %) %% / $8% % $ ) /$)$% $/,/) " / "$)!G) "$8 $ /$8%A /%)
! "
#$ % & #$##8 *#"" 8"$ ,D$) " $8$ /$8% % 8%$ %I/%) /,$8 %$"$ $ "), 8" %)8$ ) 8$ D$"I /$8 , ") / /% )$ 8G" )$ 8"$ $$$ /!$D$ $/,/)"$" / " )I / 8G , "%%)D$) 8%I8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' .
..; AH /" ) $8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' .
.4; !8 " $8 ,D$$ $/,$$ / %%!8"$8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' .
;6 ,$ !!/ / $) /$$) /$%$ ) $8 $G$ /$,$ ! / @$$ / ,$ $I8 " )8)*>.'>'.''
*.;0/ 8$ ) @)$ / $,$@$ / )$$ /0 )A8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' '
'5 ;/!"% ) , )$)A /! $8,8%%) $ / $ /$A 6CG$) %/ / $ $ $ /% %A(!))$/$ $$!/// 8"$!GA$" / 8/) )!%%!G "%A )C! /8$ %) ,8 / 8$ $ G$ // 8 , ") $))%8 " )8)*>.'>'.'' '
1 ;!%) )$$%! G!/!8 /"% % $"8$ / 8$ ) 8A0/ % /"$I /$%% / / $ % "% /$I " / @ "$ " , ) $) ""% /$I0/ / /8""$$ )I/$%%D$ , !) ) )%@$8 )$%%$8!$/$ / 8$% ) ,) $) 8$ %$A8 " )8)*>.'>'.''.
.4;;G / $ / /"% $ $)!$/ / 8$P/ "$8 " )8) !!/ 88$%% / $ $ /"!/
! "
#$ % & #$##8#*#292158
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #264APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2*>.'>'.''.
'4 ;!/ !%)! / 8$ 88$% G"!/ $ /" ) $ // / ! G$ ,$! " /%I!%) @%$ / " 8/ $ /% ,8 "$% )"$8A <@"% %)8%!$/ /$8/$%) ) $,% )8/$%) !A /" / 8 $ ) %$$ / /$G+ "% ) 8",% /!$/!$ , 8/$%)C ,/$+%//%8"$),,!$/ / )$,$ % 8A0//)"$%$!$/"",!/ $ % /)$8) +!/ /%!%) , $,% /$)) )$8/$%A 2% / "!/ /""8$ $$AE2! G!" %!/"8// $ /% / $ B" %C /"BF )!G,/!A / ," %$ // $ ! "", / !%)D$ /!!%) / ! 8%!/ " % )!$/ /$!A8 " )8)*>.1>'.'' .
*4 ;/ 88$% /%) 8$)$$ @ /"%A /!%%$ $ 8/ ,) /$ // ,%8)$$!/$%!G8!)A $ ! ,$$" ? ,$ $ / /%) /$$/A /@ 8 $,% /$A8 " )8)*>.1>'.'' '
. ;0/ )!)/$G, /$ !/ )!)"" 8% ) ""I8 " )8)*>.1>'.'' '
.1;6 C)) /D%$ %$ %8%I /%) /,D / 8 /" ",/ 8$$8% " /$8 8""$I8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.
' ;0/ / ) / 8""$I8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.1
1' ;2!)$ $ $ %+"$)8%8 " )8)*>.1>'.''.&
&& ;C $ @$A CH0= @$)A ,) ) /8A ;$/%A / @A ) /! / "8/ /$) 8AAAA8 " )8)0/ ! @$% 1.) "I %)!
! "
#$ % & #$##89*#*>.*>'.''.
&* ;@ %!$/ " )1+ "/I8 " )8)*>.*>'.'' '
1 ;2!$ /$ $% $"8$ 8""$I8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
' ;0/ !$ % 8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
14 ;2! / 8"%!$/R) $/,S))8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
&& ;$ $$,%I$ %)$ @ 8I2 8" /) $!$/ $ 8 K // 8) / 8""$ $%I2 8""$"", > /"!G 8" 8"%$$, /$ K $"8$ /$/" $%I8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.1
& ; A / $)$$)%% !)>"$% ,$I'A 6 / / $ "I1A / G ) I8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
. ;= %%!% /% 8" $ ) %G$ $8 !"$ /$/"!/ / ) )8)A / / ) 8G$/%A0$) $8 / $ ) / 8$ )$ / $8A =$8 ,) ) $8 "A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
; ,%$ /$ $ $ 8)"$$" 8$$ $ $ 8$ 88$%A !)/"),%/$ %8%!G /%) / "@) 88$ !/! / ) 8)% 8 $8$ $ %$$ $"% /$ " A8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
' ;!%) G, $"8 $ 8$$8 $/,/) AA /!!%) $) %$"$ %$,$%$ $ - + !%)! /!8",%$) !$/ $/,$ /$/" /+">!/ / %G%$GA8 " )8)*>.*>'.''.*
*.;2!8! "$$"$-/"% % "% /$ 8G) !$/ $/$ %$$" 8) /" !!/88$%% /$/" @A
! "
#$ % & #$##8!*#293159
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #265APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)*>.*>'.''.&
*4 ;0$ ,) 8" ) ! !/ ) ! G$%%/ / $ %$ / %) I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.*
& ;0/!%)E!$ 8) ) ,%) ""F ($%% $%$)I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
*& ;0/$%%$ /"% "G % /!)!8 $$ $8$ ! %+" ,$ %8%$)I %! , %/ $"% $8$%$ %$"$$ % $ %$G% "$%", $ / %8%$) /$ %A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
.*;0/ "G /$G/ /R8$%S$!%) ,) )$8) % " //!G8 !/ %!/ 8%)K )"GI / ,?8$ 8 / /% $)" %$ IK @$ ) "$%%$ %! "8$ / /$,$$I! 8$% $ /8)) $8G$ / 8$% $) 8 )8) %) ,%" /! $) "$") ? %I /$ G ?G 8$ %8"$8 /$ /!K),,) )? // / )!I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
1* ; A0/ K!E F8$ ) 8 )!/ )! %/ ) 8/ / " ) , $$ !,$ ,R$"% "8S8%%"// !$/!$/ 8%$ $68A'.' I'A 2!$ $ $,%/ 8""8$% 88$ $"% "8 ,$)$% $I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
1* ;0/ 8" $ )$ , $ )%%)!! 8 $ , % /!/8/ %%)!! ")$ I%!/ ,G!G) $((%%"8/"%,% 8%$% / /!/ ,G/$/) /% !/ 8 ) ) "/ /%$)%A/ 8$% $ $ ,%8G$$!/ / 8" G$,8 / $8$ /" A %$"$$ !$%% 8"% /$A ! " "% /$ $$ / /$ / %) @$ ,) "%A /"" " / -) "% ,8 / !!8) ,$%) /" , / ) / %%
! "
#$ % & #$##87*#$8"A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
14 ;0/ )!)%8)/"!IR!G$ 8%S) $ /$A($8$ /"%!!$%% $8 / /$ 8GA(/ / "G% %$)$ .!/ $ ") / , 8) 8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.4
&& ; /%/ ) ,$ )))I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
' ; /$ )8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
14 ;0/ $ ,%" !$ 88 ) /) 88$ 8$$8%% ))$ / ,%"I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
&' ;$ / " !! ? / /$// / )!%) $ %8%!G !/!%) / $ % ) %)$ @ $ 8$$$ ,)I)!/ $ / $"8 %8% ,$!/% $" $%I2% $ %) $8)$,% @$$ !/!%) / / $8 $ %)$ %$")I/$ $ %) $8)$,% @$ 8""$ ))8$ %!$%% %$G% !)$8 /A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.5
;2!!$%% 8 $ ) G$ )$8I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.5
'' ;206 ( < = 2 2 2 0 I8 " )8)*>.&>'.'' .
&' ;! %$"$ /"% !K /$ % %$"$ ,) )8 8"$8)8$ %8% ,$I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''
.&;H / /"!)!/ / ) ) "$$ /$$>/"A0/ ) $ 8$% ) )8$)!/ ) 88 /$/"I0/! /$ )8$$ ) /)// "8I/ 8""$! % $$)) /! ) "G /$ "8A
! "
#$ % & #$##8%*#294160
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #266APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)*>.&>'.''
. ;2!$ /$ 8$ /$ %8% "% ) %8%,$I "%! / $8)$,% )$$8% $"$)$ /$ " )!G!! % / %A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''
&4 ;!/ $ %I!/ / %I" /"I!/$/>$,$%$$ ) 2 / $%$>$8$ ) / %$G$/$8$$8 8""$$A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''
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
'* ;2!8!,"%@$,%$/"%%$// $ $$ /$ $-$%%%$ / /,!$, / 88$%AI
! "
#$ % & #$##84*#8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.'
.;2!!$%% ")$ 8%% /% / %8% /$ 8$$I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.'
1' ; " /$ ,$ 8$$8) I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.1
'* ;2!" $!$%% $ 8 " / !$$ /$!%/ ! 88$%% $$ )!/!$%% , / 8%%) 8"$8 $"8 /$A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.*
.*;2 // , / $"8 /$!$%%//"!L "" ,$ /!$%% / % "% ,8 /!$%% % $8"L%8% ,$ )I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.*
&5 ;0/ "$)8 !" ,) ) / ,$%$ % "$%$ /) / / ,$%$ ""%/"I0/ /!$ ! %% /$ % ) @I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
.4;0/ $ $ @ ),%/$I8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
.;/+"% "$% )8 $%,%% $ /!/! %$ / %%+$" ) )C! %$ $ $%A0/%),%G$ / %!/ %$ / %%+$"A%!/! $$ 8 $ /$ /$ 8%%) /%A8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
'4 ;/"% , $) ! /%) 8 " 8/ $) ! ) %% ,$ / 8""$8 " )8)*>.&>'.''.
1& ;$8% 8 " 88"")$ @A %% %$8 $$ $$ 8$$A8 " )8)*>. >'.'' '
;
0/ ! ,$$ 8$%% " %8% /"! ) /$)8$$ /+" % $,% ,8 / / %" /$$8"E" !/" !$)F)!/!"G$ $ /)!$/ %% /%>%$>"$"8AAA / %8% "$$/$!MI
%$
;, @"$ $ /"!)/%$)C6$/
! "
#$ % & #$##88*#295161
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #267APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28$ M8 " )8)*>. >'.''.4
&.; ,%$ / ) , %$"$ ,8 /!$ $K8""8$%8$$ ) /K $ $$)$%-$A K,)!$%)%$ ) / $"A / 8/8 $/,/) 8/$A K!/%"$ ) ) "8)A$)$%-$ $ $)$A 8$ /% " %/"A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
. ;!/!%) , / $"8 !88$)H H $ /$,$%$ )$8%% /$! G !I; // $/ "!%) , 8)%/$2;A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.5
'& ;!/ $ /!%) $ / 8$ ,/$!$/ /$I/)$8% "$$ /$$ @ 8A % /$ ) / 8$ /%) $!$/ $ $/A8 " )8)*>. >'.'' .
.5;0/$/%8"$8$"8 )!/!%) ?)$- / !/!/ )$ /! / "$$"%$"8 ),$%$A8 " )8)*>. >'.'' .
* ;$8!C%) $ $" % @ )% 8) !/C/%)$8 C ) @ ,I6 /,$E+$)F%% !$/ / 8/%% ))" $/,/)I6 %8% % )!$) ,% $)!$/ CI$8 C)8 /$ $) /! / /%$!G$$)I$/,/)/%/$!$/ CI8 " )8)*>. >'.''
.'; %%!% / / / $$A8 " )8)*>. >'.'' '
'' ;2!) /"% $"8 / 8" ) 8$ $8E@FI /%$G,! %$8 ) $%,$%$ ),%!G/$I8 " )8)*>. >'.''.1
&.;/!/ " / ) 8 $ %"E) /"/ "F$ / & A/ 8 / )!$/ / ",$ /!$ 8%)$% %A / )C)$8 8%$) $) "$8 %$ / / /%) , )
! "
#$ % & #$##8**#"$" $% "$8 %$ 8 , $)) , /A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.*
&1 ;2!, @ )G 8G!/ )!/ / $8 " )8)*>. >'.''.&
* ;($ %" %$%$/) )) /"%A % /$ $8"A ? ,/ " 8) /$ %% ) $ /%$/ ) /"/@A $!%) ,/ $G!$ /$! $ /A ) G!/!/ 8$ 8 G! /"!$/A !8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
&& ;2!8 ")$ /$ ,$ / %8%!G$ 8%/$ $$A8 " )8)*>. >'.''.4
'5 ;6 $ $8 8"$8 8$$I $ ) ,$ $ !I $ ) /"+!I6 $ $8 %I!%)8"") %G$$ G$ $%% 8/ H8/ A / ,%$ $ /$ 8%)E"F,)A $ $ % 8) $ / $%% ,D$) $ ) ! $ " / !/$ 8"%@A )8$ /"% $ >!"!$%% / / %8% ,8 $!$%% )8%$/ "8/ )) 8%$%A "$ /+"% ,$ %/ ,+!%/ ) ) G $ 8$)$ / ) / A6!! "G >!" " %$$ ) $+%8% !I8 " )8)*>. >'.''.
1* ;! / "$ $/ ) 8%) )$8!/ / ,%"$
%AH)$ $ "$8%% /$/ $ ) %/ 8/$8!/ / G/$"$% /$/%$)A00 /" 8/ ) %% / %8% ,$A )/"!%$G"/ $@E,N'.UF% ""A / $ 8 / 8""$A$ /$ ) $"" 8A /) / <2 "$/ %+" %8% $ / )C//" $A /$ $ ,)A <2C/,N .;)% ),% /$A 6 " $"% "/ !/ N .; !%) ) "/% $"% 8/A 6 %8% N ..U>"/ % %A 8 +<2C% !) ,! ) %%!$ $$ /!$/ /$!/% "$%!/$8/ $ / $8$% ,$ A $/ 8C$)"$%/7; $ / 8 G/$" %%$)A
! "
#$ % & #$##*$*#296162
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #268APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #28 " )8)*>. >'.''.5
4 ;/%) /,%$"$%$8IH$"$) )$ $->% 88"")$IH$"$) 8 / % /$$ !I !$)$8 @ C / ) ),%/$I8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.
'4 ;"$ !%) )$$% / / %8% 8"A0//$K !$ $ /$>/8)>/" /"% /$8 %$ 8 $ %% / " $A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.
&' ;)% !/"% / 8" $/ "A ,$ / 8$8 " )8)*>.4>'.''
*.; !$8)E$"$% $ F /!!%)! / / /"!%) / ,) %8% $ %+"%I2!" / /" / %) %+"%8% ,I))$$%% + $ )$) @$ "+/!!%)! / %% %+" % $ >!"!$)% , %8%!G$>8$,$ / %8% 8"AE# B)$$% ")B "!G 8A!$%%$>,% /$/$8 %$ /FA0/)!)!/ %$ %$>88/$<"G /$%$A $%$ 8$ /!$%%%! , $ / /$/ ,$))A/$!/ / 8 ) , )%$ " ))$8) /$ %8%"%A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.
&' ;! )$8 /"%!K!,/$8$ /)$$ ) 88$,$%$ $$ A8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.'
' ;0%%G!/! $ "%8G "% /$ +!/ @$ /!$/ /"% "% G$/$!%) , ,% ,$I8 " )8)*>.4>'.''.1
* ;2!8!"G/"% %%) ) %8"%$8)IA "@ ", ) $ 8 , ")+,8 / ,)A8 " )8)*> >'.'' .
&1 ;0/ $C/ / ),% /$ /!8!,$%)") /!8! "!/! / ,I 0%) @8%$ /"% 8 %) / $/,/) ,8"8"%% 8E%$!) )$ /!$
! "
#$ % & #$##* *#$) / ) $ % $ $ ))AAF!$%% /$ , /% $% 0/! $ / %% / %G/ / 8" ) ) %@ /$ $%,% $)/ )!! )!%%! " ) ,$/% ?8C/8/" %!/ 8" / / ) ? !G)!$/ /$"$% , 8"") $/%"I6! ) / @$80/ $ / 8 %$"$$ /"% $ , $ $ %$ " 8,%" $ / ," /$ $ ,)%$ "/)$ /$ )!%8 " )8)*> >'.'' '
1 ; / 8$8"$8 ,8" % /!$ %8% "$ $$) )!G8E/ / %$ $) 8$%$"$F$,$,%,8$$8$ $ /$8""$$E $%) %$ / / % / / /FI/$!G8 $8%) %% 8$8"$8 8%E%! "$))% /$/ )/$ $ ,!FA
>
E 5&EF &.G$)F+
) $
! "
#$ % & #$##*#*#297163
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #269APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2
! "#$ %
$ &'#$## "( )&*
!"#$ %$ &'#$## +298164
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #270APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2, -'
.
/ ' %%0!$1234#! 0561#34 ! " # !" " #$ $ ! ! "% ! " # # %
! " $ $ " $! ! "# ! !$ !&! !& %,
! "#$ %$ &'#$###+,#7
/ 8'
. 9 /
: 9 ;
; ' ;
5%0<21234#!%0% 1#34'(!! ,
! "#$ %$ &'#$##<+299165
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #271APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2,< 7
9
; 1
8 '
.
( '/ )
' ' '
0118 4
!+0<%1 34#<$05%1534<$0+1!34
" ) &,
! "#$ %$ &'#$##!+,!7
9
; 1
8 '
.
( '/ )
' ' '
66 0!21234 6!0!+1534 5 0<1+34
" ) &,
! "#$ %$ &'#$##5+300166
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #272APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2,5
) ( ' ( .) ; ;
/ : 9 / ' ; #!5 0561634 %!0!$1 34 ,
! "#$ %$ &'#$##%+,%=/' 8
'/
: ;/("# *! + ! (&! , "+ ! !&!
& + ! " ""&! - &!., #$!$%$2$ $$ #$ !$ %$ 2$#$$ 6$%2!6 $$5% %
!
"# $%&
!"#$ %$ &'#$##++301167
APPENDIX E: ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #273APPENDIX E ASPEN COMMUNITY VOICE QUESTIONNAIRES #1 AND #2I. OPEN ENDED RESPONSES TO QUESTION 6• We need specifi c City personnel that can address the impacts to the immediate neighbors of STR’s and the neighborhoods they impact. Parking, Parties and Pets!! THERE MUST BE A MECHANISM TO DENY AND REVOKE STR PERMITS FROM REPEAT OFFENDERS. The Aspen Police Department should not be the default manager of STR units. • Enforcing rules for STR’s to minimize neighborhood impact. • Pay raises for Aspen Police offi cers, child care facilities, increase Aspen food rebate amount.• Better public transport• The owners of STR properties do not care if you tax them, so just tax them. The revenue could be used for multiple programs.• General expenses• Remove funding towards destination marketing- that only makes the problem worse. The fee/tax should only go to relieving impacts.• Noise and Light Pollution abatement. Traffi c. Landfi ll. • What is the city’s/community’s greatest need? Where are we falling short in funding? If STRs are causing “problems” then the funds should be geared towards solving the issues/problems. This is something that I don’t the the general public should be weighing in one because we don’t have enough knowledge to know what areas the city needs more funding for.• We need a designated City personnel to address neighborhood impacts. Parking, Parties, Pets are a PROBLEM.• The round-about and TRAFFIC!!!! There should be stop signs on every corner in this town!• turning appropriate places toward long term rentals should be a primary goal. If there are far fewer STR allowed- far fewer- then those owners could see the value of long term renting.• Raising money for the city isn’t the point of this exercise. It’s about not ruining neighborhoods by this impacts of essentially living next to a hotel• The city should identify what impacts short term rental cause that need to be mitigated. The tax revenue should address those issues, • Entrance To Aspen solution• A subsidized hotel/hostel. 302168
74APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEWII. STR HEAT MAPI. SHORT TERM RENTAL TECHNICAL STAKEHOLDER DATA OVERVIEWA. City of Aspen STR Data Points:• There are 1,319 current active vacation rental permits (VRPs) through the City of Aspen.• 280 VRPs were issued on or after 12/8/2021, the date the emergency moratorium was announced with 78 still waiting on review or additional information from the customer.• There were only 70 VRPs issued before the City increased compliance and oversight with Council actions around business licensing requirements.• 57 properties have multiple VRPs. The top two properties are The Gant which holds 123 VRPs, and Aspen Square, which holds 106 VRPs. This means 1,262 properties have just one VRP.• The Lodge Zone District holds 316 VRPs, this is the greatest number of VRPs per Zone District. Second, is the Residential/Multi-family Zone District with 255 VRPs. R- 15 Zone District holds 186 VRPs, this is the greatest number for the residential-only districts. Second is R-6 which holds 108 VRPs. The Commercial Core holds 45 VRPs, and Commercial Lodge holds 132 VRPs.• *The Short Term Rentals by Zone District Map provides full details on the amount of VRPs for every Zone District in the COA.B. Attachments:• Short Term Rental Heat Map• Short Term Rental Density by Address• Short Term Rentals by Zone District (East Aspen to Cemetery Lane)• Short Term Rentals by Zone District (Cemetery Lane to Burlingame)• Short Term Rental by Parcel Number• Finance Summary Data – VRP Properties by Address• CAST Survey - Lodging and STR Taxes303169
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW75APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEWIII. STR DENSITY BY ADDRESSIV. SHORT TERM RENTALS BY ZONE DISTRICTsdc304170
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW76APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEWV. SHORT TERM RENTALS BY ZONE DISTRICTVI. SHORT TERM RENTALS BY ZONE DISTRICTsdc305171
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW77APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEWVII. PROPERTIES WITH MULTIPLE VACATION RENTAL PERMITSPROPERTY NAMEADDRESSCOUNT OF VRPSThe Gant610 S West End St123Aspen Square 617 E Cooper Ave106Aspen Alps 700 S Ute Ave49Mountain Lodge 311 W Main St39North of Nell 555 E Durant Ave32Chateau Roaring Fork 1039 E Cooper Ave30Lift One 131 E Durant Ave27Durant Condos 718 & 728 & 738 & 748 S Galena St23Independence Square 404 S Galena St21Chateau Chaumont 731 E Durant Ave20Chateau Du Mont 725 E Durant Ave18Chateau Eau Claire 1034 E Cooper Ave18Riverside 1024 E Cooper Ave17Fifth Avenue Condos 800 S Mill St16Fasching Haus East 747 S Galena St15Silverglo 940 Waters Ave15Chateau Aspen 630 E Cooper Ave14Fasching Haus 718 S Mill St11Cottonwoods 124 W Hyman Ave10Obermeyer Place 101 N Spring St & 501 Rio Grande Pl10South Point 205 E Durant Ave10Chateau Blanc 901 E Hyman Ave9Christiana Condominiums 501 W Main St9Cooper Condominiums 210 E Cooper Ave9Concept 600 600 E Main St8Le Clairvaux 803 E Durant Ave8Park Central West 210 E Hyman Ave8Timber Ridge 100 E Dean St8Ute Condominiums 1020 E Durant Ave8Dolomite 650 S Monarch St7Original Curve 725 E Main St7Clarendon 625 S West End St6306172
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW78APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEWLittle Nell611 S West End St6Monarch Condos700 Monarch6Old Hundred900 E Durant Ave6Alpenblick630 & 710 S Mill St5Galena Lofts434 E Main St5Shadow Mountain Condos809 S Aspen St5Silverbell805 E Cooper Ave5St. Regis315 E Dean St5Villas of Aspen100 N Eighth St5Aspen Townhouse East835 E Durant Ave4[No Name]250 S Original St4Der Berghof100 E Cooper Ave4Mittendorf450 S Original St4Mountain Chalet711 S Galena St4Aspen Edge1235 E Cooper Ave3Aspen Townhouses108 W Hyman Ave3Black Swan Hall851 S Ute Ave3Cooper Aspen Victorian1012 E Cooper Ave3Hy-West B835 E Hyman Ave3Larkspur800 E Hopkins Ave3Monarch on the Park233 E Cooper Ave3Ritz-Carlton75 Prospector Rd3Winfi eld Arms119 E Cooper Ave3Riverview1028 E Hopkins Ave2Villager Townhomes1001 E Cooper Ave2Subtotal0307173
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW79APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEWVIII. PROPERTIES WITH ONE VACATION RENTAL PERMITBIZ ADDRESSBIZ ADDRESS 2STREET #STREET NAME100 E Durant Ave1D100E Durant Ave100 E Durant Ave2A100E Durant Ave100 Park Ave100Park Ave1001 S Ute Ave1001S Ute Ave1004 E Durant Ave11004E Durant Ave1006 E Cooper Ave1006E Cooper Ave101 Park Ave101Park Ave1011 S Ute Ave1011S Ute Ave1015 E Hyman Ave21015E Hyman Ave1016 E Hyman Ave1016E Hyman Ave1022 E Hyman Ave11022E Hyman Ave1024 Vine StHunter Creek 10241024Vine St1035 E Durant Ave41035E Durant Ave1039 E Durant Ave111039E Durant Ave104 Northway Dr104Northway Dr104 W Cooper Ave2104W Cooper Ave105 E Hopkins Ave105E Hopkins Ave105 Exhibition Ln105Exhibition Ln105 Thunderbowl Ln4105Thunderbowl Ln105 W Hyman Ave105W Hyman Ave107 Aspen Mountain Rd2107Aspen Mountain Rd107 Aspen Mountain Rd9107Aspen Mountain Rd107 Park Ave107Park Ave107 S Seventh St107S Seventh St1087 Cemetery Ln1087Cemetery Ln1097 Cemetery LnB1097Cemetery Ln1098 Cemetery Ln1098Cemetery Ln1098 Waters Ave1098Waters Ave110 E Bleeker St110E Bleeker St308174
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW80APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW110 Meadows Rd111110Meadows Rd1109 Waters Ave1109Waters Ave111 Neale Ave111Neale Ave111 Park Ave111Park Ave111 Stein Way111Stein Way111 W Francis St111W Francis St111 W Hyman Ave111W Hyman Ave1112 Waters Ave1112Waters Ave1115 Waters Ave1115Waters Ave1118 Waters Ave1118Waters Ave1120 Dale Ave1120Dale Ave1145 Black Birch Dr1145Black Birch Dr117 N Monarch St2117N Monarch St117 Westview Dr117Westview Dr118 E Bleeker StLower118E Bleeker St118 E Bleeker StUpper118E Bleeker St118 E Cooper Ave118E Cooper Ave1180 Dale Ave1180Dale Ave119 S Hunter St119S Hunter St1195 E Cooper AveA1195E Cooper Ave1195 E Cooper AveB1195E Cooper Ave120 E Hyman Ave3120E Hyman Ave120 S Spring St120S Spring St1205 Tiehack Rd1205Tiehack Rd1208 E Hopkins Ave1208E Hopkins Ave121 Robinson Rd121Robinson Rd1210 Snowbunny Ln1210Snowbunny Ln1215 Riverside DrA1215Riverside Dr1215 Riverside DrB1215Riverside Dr122 Eastwood Rd122Eastwood Rd122 Northway Dr122Northway Dr122 W Main St122W Main St123 E Hallam St123E Hallam St309175
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW81APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW123 E Hyman Ave123 E Hyman Ave123 W Hyman Ave A 123 W Hyman Ave1230 Snowbunny Ln 1230 Snowbunny Ln1232 Mountain View Dr 1232 Mountain View Dr124 E Durant Ave 7 124 E Durant Ave124 E Durant Ave 10 124 E Durant Ave1240 Riverside Dr1240 Riverside Dr1242 Snowbunny Ln B 1242 Snowbunny Ln1245 Riverside Dr1245 Riverside Dr126 Park Ave126 Park Ave127 E Hallam St127 E Hallam St127 Powder Bowl Tr 127 Powder Bowl Tr127 Robinson Rd127 Robinson Rd1271 S Ute Ave1271 S Ute Ave1286 Snowbunny Ln 1286 Snowbunny Ln129 E Hopkins Ave129 E Hopkins Ave1291 Riverside Dr B 1291 Riverside Dr1300 Red Butte Dr1300 Red Butte Dr1305 Red Butte Dr1305 Red Butte Dr131 W Bleeker St131 W Bleeker St1335 Snowbunny Ln 1335 Snowbunny Ln1345 Sierra Vista Dr 1345 Sierra Vista Dr135 W Francis St135 W Francis St135 W Hopkins Ave 135 W Hopkins Ave1350 Mountain View Dr 1350 Mountain View Dr1350 Sierra Vista Dr 1350 Sierra Vista Dr136 Northway Dr The Reliant Group 136 Northway Dr1395 Snowbunny Ln 1395 Snowbunny Ln1412 Sierra Vista Dr 1412 Sierra Vista Dr1417 Crystal Lake Rd 1417 Crystal Lake Rd1423 Silver King Dr1423 Silver King Dr1430 Silver King Dr1430 Silver King Dr
310176
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW82APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW1439 Crystal Lake Rd1439Crystal Lake Rd1445 Red Butte Dr1445Red Butte Dr145 Miners Trail Rd145Miners Trail Rd1450 Silver King Dr1450Silver King Dr1465 Red Butte1465Red Butte1470 Sierra Vista Dr1470Sierra Vista Dr1490 S Ute Ave1490S Ute Ave1495 Homestake Dr21495Homestake Dr15 Westview Dr15Westview Dr150 E Durant Ave150E Durant Ave150 N Eighth St150N Eighth St1530 Silver King Dr1530Silver King Dr155 Exhibition Ln155Exhibition Ln1564 Silver King Dr1564Silver King Dr1635 Silver King Dr1635Silver King Dr164 Eastwood Rd164Eastwood Rd171 Cascade Ln171Cascade Ln173 Skimming Ln173Skimming Ln18 Roaring Fork Dr18Roaring Fork Dr200 Prospector Rd200200Prospector Rd200 W Hopkins Ave200W Hopkins Ave201 Silverlode Dr201Silverlode Dr204 E Durant Ave204E Durant Ave205 Roaring Fork Dr205Roaring Fork Dr205 S Galena St11205S Galena St205 S Galena St12205S Galena St205 W Hopkins Ave205W Hopkins Ave205 W Main St205W Main St207 N Second St207N Second St211 W Hopkins Ave211W Hopkins Ave212 S Cleveland StUpper Unit212S Cleveland St214 E Hopkins Ave214E Hopkins Ave215 Midland Ave215Midland Ave311177
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW83APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW215 W Hallam St215 W Hallam St217 E Bleeker St217 E Bleeker St217 S Third St217 S Third St217 Silverlode Dr217 Silverlode Dr219 N Monarch St219 N Monarch St220 W Main St 210 220 W Main St222 W Hopkins Ave 3 222 W Hopkins Ave222 W Hopkins Ave 4 222 W Hopkins Ave23 Smuggler Grove Rd 23 Smuggler Grove Rd233 W Bleeker St233 W Bleeker St234 E Hopkins Ave234 E Hopkins Ave234 Vine St 234 234 Vine St234 W Hallam St234 W Hallam St235 Exhibition Ln235 Exhibition Ln237 Gilbert St237 Gilbert St237 W Hopkins Ave 237 W Hopkins Ave267 Roaring Fork Dr 267 Roaring Fork Dr269 Park Ave269 Park Ave276 Coach Rd276 Coach Rd28 Maroon Dr28 Maroon Dr30 S Willow Ct30 S Willow Ct300 Lake Ave300 Lake Ave302 N Second St302 N Second St303 1/2 E Main St303 1/2 E Main St307 W Francis St307 W Francis St308 E Hopkins Ave 201 308 E Hopkins Ave310 N Sixth St310 N Sixth St311 S Aspen St 2 311 S Aspen St311 S Aspen St 5 311 S Aspen St311 S Aspen St 6 311 S Aspen St311 S First St A 311 S First St233 W Bleeker St D 233 W Bleeker St
312178
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW84APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW312 W Hyman AveB105312W Hyman Ave314 E Hyman Ave102314E Hyman Ave314 E Hyman Ave200314E Hyman Ave314 E Hyman Ave300314E Hyman Ave315 Park Ave315315Park Ave316 S West End St316S West End St32 Prospector Rd32Prospector Rd320 N Seventh St2320N Seventh St320 W Main StA320W Main St322 Coach Rd322Coach Rd322 E Bleeker St322E Bleeker St322 Park Ave1322Park Ave322 Park Ave2322Park Ave324 E Bleeker St324E Bleeker St326 Oak Ln326Oak Ln326 W Hopkins AveA326W Hopkins Ave330 W Bleeker St330W Bleeker St332 W Main StC332W Main St333 Vine St333333Vine St333 Vine St333333Vine St333 W Main St1A333W Main St337 Silverlode Dr337Silverlode Dr340 Eastwood Rd340Eastwood Rd342 Summit StB342Summit St345 Park Ave2345Park Ave350 E Summit StC350E Summit St350 E Summit StC350E Summit St353 Pfister Dr353Pfister Dr355 Pfister Dr355Pfister Dr36 Roaring Fork Dr36Roaring Fork Dr387 Silverlode Dr387Silverlode Dr313179
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW85APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW388 Exhibition Ln388 Exhibition Ln395 Silverlode Dr395 Silverlode Dr400 E Main St 101 400 E Main St400 W Hopkins Ave 2 400 W Hopkins Ave401 W Bleeker St401 W Bleeker St401 W Bleeker St401 W Bleeker St401 W Francis St401 W Francis St406 Aspen St 101 406 Aspen St406 E Hopkins Ave Penthouse 406 E Hopkins Ave407 N Third St407 N Third St407 Park Ave C 407 Park Ave407 S Aspen St 104 407 S Aspen St409 S Aspen St 105 409 S Aspen St410 S West End St 101 410 S West End St411 Pearl Ct411 Pearl Ct411 W Francis St411 W Francis St415 S Aspen St 202 415 S Aspen St415 S Aspen St415 S Aspen St415 W North St415 W North St419 E Hyman Ave Penthouse 419 E Hyman Ave419 S Aspen St 102 419 S Aspen St420 W Francis St420 W Francis St420 W North St420 W North St421 Aabc G 421 Aabc421 S Aspen St 101 421 S Aspen St421 S West End St421 S West End St424 Park Cir TH-3 424 Park Cir424 Park Cir TH-5 424 Park Cir425 Park Cir B4 425 Park Cir426 E Hyman Ave426 E Hyman Ave426 E Main St426 E Main St427 Silverlode Dr427 Silverlode Dr
314180
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW86APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW428 E Hyman AveA428E Hyman Ave43 Smuggler St43Smuggler St437 W Smuggler St437W Smuggler St437 W Smuggler St437W Smuggler St447 E Cooper Ave447E Cooper Ave449 Mountain Laurel Dr2449Mountain Laurel Dr450 S Riverside AveB450S Riverside Ave501 W Hopkins Ave501W Hopkins Ave503 W Main StB101503W Main St505 Park CirB505Park Cir505 Park CirB505Park Cir508 E Cooper Ave201508E Cooper Ave509 Race StB509Race St509 W Hopkins Ave509W Hopkins Ave509 W Main St509W Main St51 Thunderbowl Ln1251Thunderbowl Ln511 Walnut StO511Walnut St513 W Bleeker St513W Bleeker St513 W Main StE201513W Main St515 Park Cir515Park Cir520 E Cooper Ave305520E Cooper Ave520 W Main St23520W Main St521 N Seventh StA521N Seventh St525 S Original StGlory Hole C525S Original St525 S Original StGlory Hole D525S Original St530 W Hallam St530W Hallam St532 Walnut St100532Walnut St532 Walnut StB532Walnut St537 Race St537Race St546 Walnut St546Walnut St55 Overlook Dr55Overlook Dr550 Lazy Chair Ranch Rd550Lazy Chair Ranch Rd315181
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW87APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW566 Race StB566Race St570 S Riverside Ave570S Riverside Ave570 Spruce St570Spruce St575 Sneaky Ln575Sneaky Ln58 Exhibition Ln58Exhibition Ln60 Northway Dr60Northway Dr601 S Monarch St1601S Monarch St601 S Monarch St2601S Monarch St601 S West End St1601S West End St601 S West End St6601S West End St601 S West End St8601S West End St601 S West End St5601S West End St601 W North St601W North St602 E Hyman Ave201602E Hyman Ave603 S Garmisch603S Garmisch603 S Garmisch603S Garmisch604 N Eighth St604N Eighth St605 E Main St301605E Main St611 S Monarch St2611S Monarch St611 S Monarch St5611S Monarch St612 W Main St612W Main St615 W Smuggler St615W Smuggler St616 S Galena St616S Galena St616 W Main St616W Main St616.5 W Main St6165 W Main St620 E Hyman Ave1620E Hyman Ave623 S MonarchA623S Monarch623 S MonarchC623S Monarch624 W Francis St624W Francis St625 E Main St201 Penthouse C625E Main St625 S West End St15625S West End St316182
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW88APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW626 W Francis StA626W Francis St626 W Francis St626W Francis St627 E Hopkins Ave627E Hopkins Ave627 S Original St627S Original St630 E Hyman Ave301630E Hyman Ave631 S Galena St11631S Galena St631 S Galena St13631S Galena St633 W Francis St633W Francis St635 Sneaky Ln635Sneaky Ln64 Prospector Rd64Prospector Rd651 Pfister Dr651Pfister Dr655 Gibson Ave655Gibson Ave660 S Galena St660S Galena St670 Moore Dr670Moore Dr675 Meadows Rd675Meadows Rd701 S MonarchCaribou Club #4701S Monarch702 E Hyman Ave702E Hyman Ave702 W Main St702W Main St704 E Cooper Ave3704E Cooper Ave704 E Hyman Ave704E Hyman Ave704 S Galena St704S Galena St705 W Main St705W Main St706 E Cooper Ave4706E Cooper Ave708 E Cooper Ave708E Cooper Ave708 E Hyman Ave708E Hyman Ave708 W Bleeker St708W Bleeker St709 E Main St303709E Main St710 N Third St710N Third St711 W Bleeker St711W Bleeker St711 W Bleeker St711W Bleeker St712 S Galena StA712S Galena St715 E Hopkins Ave2715E Hopkins Ave317183
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW89APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW715 W North StCenter715W North St716 W Francis St716W Francis St717 Aspen StB717Aspen St717 W Francis StA717W Francis St720 W Bleeker St720W Bleeker St725 Cemetery LnUnits 721, 723, 725, 727725Cemetery Ln727 E Hopkins AveA727E Hopkins Ave728 E Hopkins Ave728728E Hopkins Ave730 Bay St730Bay St731 Cemetery Ln731Cemetery Ln731 S Mill St1A731S Mill St731 S Mill St1B731S Mill St731 S Mill St2A731S Mill St733 W Francis St1733W Francis St735 E Bleeker StCreektree 735735E Bleeker St735 E Francis St735E Francis St736 W Smuggler StB736W Smuggler St745 Castle Creek Dr745Castle Creek Dr75 Overlook Dr75Overlook Dr76 Exhibition Ln76Exhibition Ln77 Westview Dr77Westview Dr790 W Hallam St3790W Hallam St793 Cemetery Ln1793Cemetery Ln800 Roaring Fork Rd800Roaring Fork Rd800 S Monarch St1800S Monarch St800 S Monarch St5800S Monarch St800 S Monarch St9800S Monarch St800 S Monarch St13800S Monarch St800 S Monarch St14800S Monarch St800 S Monarch St#4800S Monarch St800 W Smuggler St800W Smuggler St801 E Hopkins Ave2801E Hopkins Ave318184
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW90APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW802 E Cooper Ave2802E Cooper Ave802 E Cooper Ave3802E Cooper Ave809 S Aspen St3809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St11809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St15809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St16809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St18809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St19809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St#1809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St#2809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St#20809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St#5809S Aspen St809 S Aspen St#7809S Aspen St81 Thunderbowl Ln1681Thunderbowl Ln810 E Cooper Ave810E Cooper Ave812 E Cooper Ave812E Cooper Ave814 E Cooper Ave814814E Cooper Ave814 W Bleeker StAspen Villas C3814W Bleeker St814 W Bleeker StAspen Villas C4814W Bleeker St814 W Bleeker StAspen Villas E6814W Bleeker St815 Bonita Dr815Bonita Dr815 Roaring Fork Rd815Roaring Fork Rd816 E Cooper Ave816E Cooper Ave816 E Hyman Ave816E Hyman Ave817 W North St817W North St818 E Hyman Ave818E Hyman Ave819 E Hyman Ave2819E Hyman Ave82 Westview Dr82Westview Dr820 E Cooper Ave820E Cooper Ave820 E Hyman AveA820E Hyman Ave825 Cemetery Ln1825Cemetery Ln825 E Hopkins Ave1N825E Hopkins Ave825 E Hopkins Ave2S825E Hopkins Ave319185
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW91APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW825 S Ute AveA825S Ute Ave83 Exhibition Ln83Exhibition Ln83 Ute Pl83Ute Pl835 E Cooper Ave4835E Cooper Ave855 Roaring Fork Rd855Roaring Fork Rd857 Bonita Dr857Bonita Dr865 Roaring Fork Rd865Roaring Fork Rd900 Waters Ave900Waters Ave901 E Durant AveB901E Durant Ave901 S Ute Ave901S Ute Ave901 W Francis St901W Francis St907 Waters Ave907Waters Ave909 Vine St909Vine St91 Meadows Trustee Rd9191Meadows Trustee Rd910 Gibson AveB910Gibson Ave910 W Hallam St8910W Hallam St911 Waters Ave911Waters Ave914 Waters Ave1914Waters Ave914 Waters Ave4914Waters Ave914 Waters Ave5914Waters Ave914 Waters Ave19914Waters Ave914 Waters Ave20914Waters Ave914 Waters Ave21914Waters Ave916 E Hopkins Ave104916E Hopkins Ave916 E Hopkins Ave201916E Hopkins Ave918 S Mill StA918S Mill St924 W Hallam St924W Hallam St925 E Durant Ave2925E Durant Ave926 E Cooper Ave1926E Cooper Ave926 E Durant Ave3926E Durant Ave926 Waters Ave101926Waters Ave926 Waters Ave102926Waters Ave926 Waters Ave202926Waters Ave320186
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW92APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW926 Waters Ave201926Waters Ave927 E Durant Ave3927E Durant Ave928 W Hallam St928W Hallam St929 E Durant Ave4929E Durant Ave930 W Francis St930W Francis St930 W Hallam St930W Hallam St934 S Mill St934S Mill St935 E Hopkins Ave2935E Hopkins Ave935 E Hopkins Ave6935E Hopkins Ave935 E Hopkins Ave9935E Hopkins Ave935 E Hopkins Ave10935E Hopkins Ave935 E Hopkins Ave11935E Hopkins Ave935 E Hopkins Ave12935E Hopkins Ave938 S Mill St938S Mill St940 Matchless Dr940Matchless Dr941 E Hyman Ave941E Hyman Ave945 E Cooper Ave945E Cooper Ave950 Cemetery Ln1950Cemetery Ln950 Cemetery Ln2950Cemetery Ln950 Matchless DrA950Matchless Dr979 Queen St979Queen St981 King St981King St99 Northway Dr99Northway Dr990 Gibson Ave990Gibson Ave991 Moore Dr991Moore Dr321187
APPENDIX F: STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEW93APPENDIX F STR DATA POINTS OVERVIEWVIII. CAST SURVEY - LODGING & STR TAXES322188
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor and City Council
FROM:Pete Strecker, Finance Director
THROUGH:Sara Ott, City Manager
MEETING DATE: May 9, 2022
RE:Short-Term Rental – Tax Questions
REQUEST OF COUNCIL:
Council has requested staff facilitate a Council work session to further consider a short-term rental tax
that would ultimately establish resources for addressing Community impacts generated by the STR
economy in the areas of workforce housing and childcare, environmental and other issues. Staff is
requesting input from Council in a number of policy areas to help further this taxation question.
SUMMARY / BACKGROUND:
Following the adoption of the moratorium on December 8, staff has been working collaboratively with a
diverse set of stakeholders in the short-term rental (STR) arena, to garner various perspectives around
how to best consider regulations that might influence both community and neighborhood feel as well as
fairness in the lodging industry. In tandem with these meetings, staff has had periodic check-ins with
Council, to seek policy direction on the identified key focus areas: zoning, good neighbor policies,
operational standards, life safety standards, permitting, financials and enforcement. At the April 11
check-in, staff asked for Council input around the desire to have an operational fee, and also the interest
level for a voter-approved tax, on STRs. Staff received feedback at that meeting to proceed with an
operational fee assessment and agreed for staff to return to seek answers to policy questions around
the issue of taxation.
DISCUSSION:
Staff is continuing to work on the operational fee computation and has enlisted the assistance of a third-
party consultant to develop the needed basis for nexus considerations that will equate the efforts of
financial oversight; health, life and safety inspection; zoning enforcement; etc. into that rate. This fee
will be presented at a future session with Council and ultimately incorporated into an ordnance for
adoption.
Regarding the issue of taxation, staff requires Council direction on a number of policy items before a tax
question can be formulated for consideration. Depending on when Council can provide direction to
these areas will play into the ultimate timing of a ballot question.
POLICY QUESTION #1: What is the desired timeframe for approaching voters with a STR tax
question?
During the April 11 work session discussion, Council members proposed two possible dates for when to
approach voters: November 2022 or March 2023. Consideration for which date would be best to ask
voters for tax policy changes was reflective a November election being a major election and that the
152189
City’s tax question could be lost along with other issues on the ballot and/or could be competing with
other tax questions from nearby or overlapping jurisdictions.
Staff has requested input from the County and other taxing entities in the upper Valley and is aware that
the Ambulance District may being looking at an operational tax in 2022 and that the County had various
needs (housing, jail, childcare, mental health) that might have tax needs for consideration in 2023.
DECISION NEEDED: Does Council desire to place a question on the November 2022 ballot? If this is
desired, staff must notify the County in June that it desires to be included on the ballot. A ballot
question will need to be formalized and adopted in two readings by the Council by the end of August,
and then the formal ballot question will need to be conveyed to the County by early September for
certification.
POLICY QUESTION #2: What are the intended uses of the tax to be levied?
During previous work sessions and included in the language of the moratorium, Council has expressed
the unfunded impacts associated with the robust short-term rental market that exists within Aspen.
Explicitly stated impacts to affordable housing and childcare, transit and the environment were all
identified as not being captured for these businesses, and unlike the realities for other commercially
licensed businesses.
DECISION NEEDED: Can Council affirm whether or not these impact areas are aligned with the taxation
question that would be presented to voters? Are there any areas missing or are some areas of lesser
priority than others? Can the Council provide direction around an allocation for a STR tax to the desired
areas of impact to help steer a future ballot question?
POLICY QUESTION #3: Should an existing tax be reviewed? Who should pay the tax? What
level of taxation? This policy question is truly a three-in-one ask as there is an
interdependence between them.
The response to an initial question of how existing taxes align with Council and Community expectations
can create a basis for what type of tax and level of taxation. Aspen voters have already adopted a 2.0%
lodging tax that is levied not only on traditional lodge offerings, but on STRs as well. This tax is based on
the nightly room rate, with proceeds (this tax generated roughly $4.2M in 2021) dedicated to two
specific operations: tourism promotion ($3.1M) and transit services ($1.1M).
DECISION #3A NEEDED: Does the revenue generated and use of the current lodging tax align well with
Council and Community expectations?
Currently, the City already levies a lodging tax that is paid on short-term rentals in both traditional
lodges and in the single owner rental offerings, and is equal to 2.0% of the nightly rate (for stays up to
29 nights). This tax is currently dedicated towards two uses: no-fare transit services within the City and
tourism promotion.
Since there is an existing tax levied on nightly stays in these non-traditional STR lodge offerings, staff felt
it is appropriate to highlight this overlap before proceeding down a new tax question and allow Council
to evaluate the current tax use and whether it remains aligned with Community interests. This tax can
remain in place whether a new tax is levied or not, but due to the intersection of a new tax with what
153190
has already been adopted by voters is worth assessing. If changes were desired, an in-depth discussion
of how best to address modifications would be required at a future work session.
DECISION #3B NEEDED: Is there a preferred option for what the tax structuring would look like when
addressing a tax for the short-term rental industry?
For consideration of potential new taxation on the short-term rental industry, there are options as to
how to structure a tax. The two most common methods for taxation would either an ad valorem excise
tax or flat rate per unit excise tax. These options allow a level of scalability for the cost per room or the
size of lodging offered, they are relatively simple to understand, and they are easy to pass on to the
renter. That said, an excise tax on bedroom count doesn’t appear to scale up or down nearly as
equitably as a percentage of nightly room rate.
There is a question for the Council around the urgency of addressing the community impacts identified
by Council in Question #1 which can lend itself back to what level of taxation is desired for this industry
to pay its fair share. Should the targeted tax be set to fully offset the disparity in the property taxation
process? Laying this on top of the existing 2.0% lodging tax, and wanting to expand uses to areas such
as more affordable housing and childcare (for example), what additional percentage should be levied?
This can also be considered in terms of future Community intent to use these resources as pledged
sources for issuing new debt.
To provide context around setting a new tax rate:
Looking solely at the disparity in assessed valuation rates for commercial properties and
residential properties (where STRs operate as commercial businesses but pay a residential
property tax rate), a starting point for a new ad valorem excise tax on nightly room rates could
be 5.4%.
o This could be allocated for use based on voter approval and would not be limited to the
current uses of the general purpose and clean river program mill levies, though both the
Asset Management Plan and Stormwater Plan both have funding needs.
The above does not necessarily then impact childcare or additional affordable housing funding
needs, so the 5.4% could be further escalated to account for those needs.
Researching some other communities that already have a specific STR lodging tax approved,
those communities range from an additional 2% to 15% on nightly rental rates.
CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS:
Staff requires input from Council around the timing of a ballot question, the uses of existing taxes and
the structure of a new tax and its intended purpose for addressing community impacts from the short-
term rental economy.
It is anticipated that a follow up session will be needed to address the issue of what tax rate should be
pursued. If sufficient responses to all questions can be provided in the next month, the possibility of
reaching the November ballot timeframe is possible, but may not be the Council preferred timeline
(TBD). Whatever the outcome, staff is prepared to take the necessary steps to bring forward Council’s
direction, once provided.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
154191
Short-term Rentals –Financial Discussion
City Council –Work Session
May 9, 2022
155192
Work Session on March 1:
•Zoning –number, location, density/intensity of use, surrounding uses
•Permitting –eligibility, transferability
•Life safety –inspections, fire, signage and noticing
•Financials –fees and taxes
•Operational standards –days of operation/year, occupancy,
nuisances, wildlife/trash, parking/access
•Enforcement –staff support, enforcement plan, fine schedule
Previous Council Direction & Community Engagement
156193
Workgroup Meeting March 17:
•Attendees –condo-hotels, real estate brokers, property management
groups, individual homeowners, regulatory groups
•Overview –current tax rates, who is paying, current collection levels,
options for taxes vs. fees and review of other communities’ actions
•Takeaways –understanding of fee to capture operational costs to run the
program, support for taxes over fees to address impact concerns
Work Session on April 11:
•Fees –focus on regulation and enforcement cost capture (items from 3/1)
•Taxes –focus on STR related impacts to Community
Previous Council Direction & Community Engagement
157194
1) Timing of Question? –Where are we with Community support and
what are other jurisdictions considering that could affect approval of a
ballot question?
2) Purpose of Tax? –What programs would we want to support with
these new resources to address STR related impacts?
3a) New or Existing Tax?–How does this layer over or within current
taxation in place?
3b) Who Pays the Tax? –Is this a tax that encompasses the entire
lodging community or just short-term rentals?
3c) What is the Target? –Is there a level of resources desired for
application with this tax?
Direction Sought from Council Tonight
158195
Question #1 –Ballot Timing
•November 2022 –major election may lead to
greater turnout, but also can have question
“get lost”
•March 2023 –Aspen one of few that have
election at this time, but delays the
implementation of tax collections
•What Are Other Jurisdictions Considering?
o 2022 –Ambulance Operations
o 2023 –Possibly Housing, Jail, Childcare,
Mental Health
159196
Question
What timeline does Council wish to consider around a ballot question?
Policy Outcomes
Support for additional tax and for its uses in tackling Community concerns
Staff Notes
Following voter decision, will take about 2 full months to align system
changes for tax collection. January 2023 tax remittance due February 20th.
Question #1 –Ballot Timing
Notify
County of
Election
Needs
June
Council
Adopts
Ordinance
End of
Aug
Ballot
Language
Certified
1st Week
Sept
Election
Day11/8/2022
Effective
Date of
Tax
1/1/2023
160197
Question #2 –Purpose of Tax
Fee (Operational Based)Tax (Impact Based)Percent or
Priority
Zoning and Permitting Affordable Housing ?
Licensing, Auditing & Tax Collection Childcare ?
Life Safety Inspections Transit ?
Education of Regulations Environmental Impacts ?
Enforcement Efforts “Other”?
How Shall Tax Revenue Be Directed for Community Benefit?
161198
Question
What are the desired uses for new tax collections?
Policy Outcomes
Address impacts to the Community for increased visitation and residential
development activity due to short-term rental lodging options
Staff Notes
Clearly define uses for new tax revenue
Create flexibility,within defined uses, to be nimble to changes
Transit impacts may not need to be prioritized at this time.
Question #2 –Purpose of Tax
162199
Question #3 –New or Existing, Who Pays, How Much
Jurisdiction and Tax Type Rate
Levied
City of Aspen Sales Tax 2.40%
Pitkin County Sales Tax 3.60%
Roaring Fork Transit Authority Sales Tax 0.40%
State of Colorado Sales Tax 2.90%
Total Sales Tax 9.30%
City of Aspen Lodging Tax (on Room Sales)2.00%
Total Sales and Lodging Tax 11.30%
$24.5M in 2021
$15.3M –Parks & Open Space (1.5%)
$3.1M –Education (0.3%)
$2.5M –Childcare (0.45% * 55%)
$2.1M –Housing (0.45% * 45%)
$1.5M –Transportation (0.15%)
Next
Slide
163200
2021 Taxable
Room Sales
Current
2.0% Tax
Percent of Total
Resources
STR Lodging*$82,600,000 $1,652,000 40%
Traditional Lodging $126,650,000 $2,533,000 60%
Total Lodging Industry $209,250,000 $4,185,000 100%
Transportation (0.50%)$1,046,250 25%
Tourism Promotion (1.50%)$3,138,750 75%
Total Use of Resources $4,185,000 100%
* Includes properties like the Gant, Aspen Square, Aspen Alps, etc. that are individually owned units.
Question #3 –New or Existing, Who Pays, How Much
Current Taxation In Place
164201
Question
Does the current tax use align well with Community expectations?
Policy Outcomes
Ensuring existing resources are allocated for desired outcomes and
consistent with public interests.
Staff Notes
IF there were desired changes to this existing taxing authority, it would be a
separate ballot question and should be discussed for timing as well.
Question #3 –New or Existing, Who Pays, How Much
165202
Flat Rate Per Bedroom / Pillow Count
Least preferrable option. Not significant disparity
for rentals of varying price points. Does not
achieve desired fairness outcomes.
Percentage of Nightly Rental Rate
Aligns with current tax structure for easy of
understanding and scales up to reflect premiums
charged for high-end rentals.
Question #3 –New or Existing, Who Pays, How Much
Options for
New Excise
Tax
166203
2021 Taxable Room
Sales
Each Add’l 1.0% Tax
STR Sector of Lodging Economy $82,600,000 $826,000
Question #3 –New or Existing, Who Pays, How Much
Possible New Taxation
SHALL CITY OF ASPEN TAXES BE INCREASED NOT MORE THAN $[____] COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2023, AND BY
WHATEVER AMOUNTS ARE GENERATED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER BY THE IMPOSITION OF AN EXCISE TAX OF NOT MORE
THAN [___]%ON THE AMOUNT CHARGED TO ANY PERSON ON A NIGHTLY ROOM RATE AT ANY ACCOMMODATION OR
BUSINESS THAT IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN A VACATION RENTAL PERMIT FROM THE CITY; AND SHALL THE REVENUE
GENERATED FROM SUCH TAX BE UTILIZED FOR THE PURPOSE FUNDING [________________], WITH THE RATE OF TAX
BEING ALLOWED TO BE INCREASED OR DECREASED WITHOUT FURTHER VOTER APPROVAL SO LONG AS THE RATE OF
TAXATION DOES NOT EXCEED [___]%; AND SHALL THE CITY BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, KEEP AND SPEND THE REVENUES
FROM SUCH TAX AND ANY INVESTMENT INCOME THEREFROM NOTWITHSTANDING THE LIMITS OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 20
OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION?
167204
What STR Industry Looks Like Today
Bedrooms Per
Listing
Number of
Rentals
Number of
Bedrooms
Total Heated
Area
Average Square
Feet Per Listing
Total Actual
Value
Total Assessed
Value
0 113 113*61,239 542 $117,330,500 $8,389,180
1 154 154 91,116 592 $146,012,700 $10,439,810
2 430 860 459,006 1,067 $899,114,000 $64,286,730
3 307 932 563,030 1,834 $1,153,142,000 $82,449,640
4 142 568 503,461 3,546 $945,690,700 $67,616,900
5 64 320 316,342 4,943 $544,402,000 $38,924,730
6 21 126 141,281 6,728 $259,273,900 $18,539,410
7 8 56 72,491 9,061 $155,489,600 $11,117,510
8 1 8 6,535 6,535 $18,786,000 $1,343,200
13 2 26 23,487 11,744 $34,875,700 $4,328,430
Totals:1,242*3,152 2,237,988 1,802 $4,274,117,100 $307,435,540
Not Shown:
21 Records
Still Vetting
* Includes properties like the Gant, Aspen Square, Aspen Alps, etc. that are individually owned units and make up a large
portion of the 0-, 1-and 2-bedroom units shown above.168205
Actual Property Value for STR Listings $4,274,117,100
Assessed Value at Residential Rate $307,435,540
Assessed Value at Commercial Rate $1,239,493,959
Difference in Assessed Value $932,058,419
General Purpose & Clean River Program Mill Levies 4.788
Delta in Property Tax Revenue $4,462,696
Every 1% in Lodging Tax on STR Units Generates $826,000
Excise Tax Rate to Generate Equivalent $4.462M 5.4%
Question #3 –New or Existing, Who Pays, How Much
To solely address assessment rate variance, an
excise tax of 5.4% would be needed…
… with these resources applied to the above noted mill
levy areas or to other voter-approved purposes
169206
Tax Rates Nightly Stay 29 Night Stay
Nightly Rate in Aspen $1,500.00 $45,000.00
City of Aspen Sales Tax 2.40%$36.00 $1,044.00
Pitkin County Sales Tax 3.60%$54.00 $1,566.00
Roaring Fork Transit Tax 0.40%$6.00 $174.00
State of Colorado Sales Tax 2.90%$43.50 $1,261.50
City of Aspen Current Lodging Tax 2.00%$30.00 $870.00
Subtotal: Current Existing Tax *$169.50 $4,915.50
A. New STR Tax (Just Property Tax)5.40%$81.00 $2,349.00
B. New STR Tax (?)???
Total: With Any Additional STR Tax *$250.50 $7,264.50
Question #3 –New or Existing, Who Pays, How Much
Based on 5/4/2022 Advertised Average Nightly Rate…
170207
Question #3 –New or Existing, Who Pays, How Much
What are other communities doing?
Community Total Tax STR Tax STR Tax Specific Uses
Aspen 11.300%TBD TBD
Avon 14.400%2.00%Community Housing
Crested Butte 20.900%7.50%Affordable Housing
Frisco 15.725%5.00%Affordable Housing
Mt. Crested Butte 16.800%2.90%Affordable Housing
Ouray 27.950%15.00%Affordable Housing & Wastewater
Telluride 15.150%2.50%Affordable Housing
171208
Policy Outcomes
Ensure alignment of existing resources is reflective of Community wishes
Establish new taxes for current unfunded impacts
Address concerns around fairness in lodging economy for taxation
Staff Notes
The timing of outcomes in areas of housing, childcare, environment, etc.
depend on resources available
The mill levy gap is only one area of disparity as there are other community
impacts that are not currently funded
Question #3 –New or Existing, Who Pays, How Much
172209
Next Steps
Timing Drives Everything
November 2022 ballot question would force rapid process;
March 2023 allows for greater flexibility in process
Additional Work Session Tentatively Scheduled for June 7
Were all answers available around purpose and targeted level of
resources?
What questions does Council need analysis to for further
consideration?
173210
Page 1 of 5
MEMORANDUM
TO:Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council
FROM:Jen Phelan, Development Manager and Shirley Ritter, Kids First Director
THROUGH:Scott Miller, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE:August 16, 2022
RE:Design Direction on Burlingame Early Childhood Education Center
REQUEST OF COUNCIL:Staff is providing an update on the progress of the Burlingame Early Childhood
Education (ECE) center, as well as follow-up information on the outreach that has been undertaken and
the density cap associated with the Burlingame subdivision. As part of this update, staff is requesting
feedback on design direction.
SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND: To progress a
critical City Council goal to increase childcare
capacity, staff issued a request for proposal
(RFP) to develop a childcare facility in the
Burlingame subdivision,selected the proposal
submitted by design firm Land and Shelter and
requested Council approve the contract.Since
the contract’s execution, staff and the
consultants have engaged in public outreach
on the project, created an Executive
Committee,and Design Advisory Group (DAG)
to provide guidance on design concepts for the
site.
As a refresher on the project, the city is
evaluating the ability to develop an ECE center
and housing on acreage comprised of three lots
adjacent to Harmony Road and Paepcke Road.
Parcel C contains 37,502 sq. ft. of area with
street frontage on both roads, the former
being the primary road into and out of the subdivision, the latter being part of the construction scope of
Phase 3 of Burlingame. Adjacent to this parcel are two lots approved for single-family development, Lot 3
(4,542 sq. ft.) and Lot 4 (4,486 sq. ft.),all three totaling 46,530 sq. ft. of area that are being considered for
development as part of the overall site plan. The largest parcel, Parcel C, contains steep grades. Following
is a high-level overview on the design development and public outreach undertaken for the project and
the density allowances and limitations associated with the subdivision.
Figure 1: Subject site
211
Page 2 of 5
Design Development. To begin concept development for the ECE center, the design team initially
collaborated with an executive committee comprised of city staff and Kids First board members. This
group discussed the ideal programming of the ECE and outlined a preference for multiple housing units.
Feedback gathered during initial outreach also informed design ideas for the project.
The preferred programming for the ECE center includes seven classrooms that will serve about one
hundred infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. A gross motor room, administration space, entry
requirements and circulation, adequate storage, and support space make up the building’s program. A
focus on day lighting, access to outdoor play space, and incorporation of sustainable design techniques
was deemed important. With the preferred programming verified by the executive team, work began on
site planning and massing studies for a number of design concepts. Meanwhile, a design advisory group
(DAG) with a greater number of participants was created. In addition to members of the executive
committee, additional members with experience in childcare, sustainability, construction management,
and landscape design were included with the intent to further guide the design.
A number of concepts have been developed and refined down to two: Hillside (Exhibit A) and Streetside
(Exhibit B). Each contain identical programming for the ECE center but develop the site differently and
contain different amounts of housing. The Hillside concept proposes a standalone ECE center on Parcel C
as well as surface parking, with a fourplex on the two residential lots. Streetside provides an integrated
ECE/housing building at the corner of Harmony Road and Paepcke Road and provides for seven affordable
housing units in the building. Parking is proposed to be a combination of at grade and underground
structured parking. The DAG evaluated both design concepts and preferred the Hillside concept. Since
review of the concepts, both have been provided to a cost estimator to provide a high-level estimate that
will also identify significant cost drivers associated with each design.
Figure 2: Hillside design concept
212
Page 3 of 5
Figure 3: Streetside design concept
Public Outreach (Exhibit C). Prior to developing an RFP for the project, city staff conducted an ice cream
social at the Burlingame commons building in September 2021 and discussed the idea of providing
childcare in the subdivision. Since contracting with the Land and Shelter team, Project Resource Studio
has assisted the city on engagement initiatives including two open houses at Burlingame (May 5th and July
13th) and a community wide survey, completed in June, via the Aspen Community Voice platform.
A number of themes have emerged from the outreach. The neighborhood has raised concerns about
parking and traffic, the ability to staff the facility, and prioritizing neighborhood children to attend. Both
outreach efforts provided the opportunity for residents to meet the design team, ask questions, and rank
design and programming ideas for the project. The community wide survey received over seventy
responses with eighty-four percent identifying as Burlingame residents. The survey polled respondentson
their interest in using the childcare facility, ranking of design ideas for the site, and potential concerns
associated with the facility. This outreach builds upon the City of Aspen 2022 Community Survey which
polled the community on infant care and early childhood needs where “most placed importance on taking
action to improve childcare needs”.
Table 1: Community survey results
213
Page 4 of 5
DensityCap.BurlingameRanch was originally approved to be developed with 236 housing unitsconsisting
ofa mix of multi-familyand single-familydwellings. At some point thecity approached the HOA to discuss
an increase in the overall number of units in thesubdivision. In 2009, an agreement between the city and
the HOA was memorializedby two resolutionsto increase the overall density to 256 dwellings(Exhibit D),
consisting of 13 single-family and 243 muti-familydwellings. The city agreed to a number of amendments
and improvements to the subdivision as part of the negotiations that are outlined in the resolutions. In
addition, agreed upon language changes to the declarations include a provision that any future increase
in density requires unanimous approval by one hundred percent of the unit owners. Currently, the
number of occupied units in Burlingame is one hundred and seventy-seven.
DISCUSSION:Staff would like to confirm with City Council the design concept that should move forward
to schematic design. Additionally, staff is looking for any additional guidance with the selected concept
that the design team should consider as they advance a design.
Preferred Design. Of the two concepts, the DAG’s preferred option is the Hillside design. Both ECE center
concepts meet theprogrammingrequirements;however, the standalone buildingwas thought to provide
a bettersenseof place andarrival for the future students. Separation between work and housing was also
deemed desirable by the advisory committee. Additionally, staff considered the ability to work on the
entitlements for the ECE center and housing together or separately as advantageous to progressing the
center.Staff is assuming that this concept will cost less than the Streetside design as no structuredparking
is proposed and will have cost estimating numbers available for the work session. Staff is requesting
confirmation that Hillside is the preferred design concept.
Design Components.
ECE center. As mentioned earlier, the design concept provides seven student rooms, a gross motor
room, and accessory space. The initial massing of the building includes two stories, with some of
the mass built into the hillside, outdoor play areas and maximizing day lighting opportunities in
the structure are included.Is Council comfortable moving this design forward?
Parking.Surface parking on the site provides the most economic means to provide parking.
Although there is cost savings compared to structured parking, the parking is more visible and
takes up a greaterpercentage of the lot compared to the Streetsideconcept. The design team has
noted that this design provides less parking than the Streetside concept. The DAG has asked the
design team (and traffic consultant) to further consider parking needs with multi-modal
opportunities incorporated into the design, including possible shuttle opportunities.Does Council
have any additional design direction for the team on parking?
Housing. With the Hillside concept, four housing units are incorporated into the design with
parking on the ground level and two upper stories of housing. The initial design intent is to
complement the massing and design of Burlingame Phase III units currently under construction
while still relating to the ECEcenter. Initial commentsfrom the DAG arethat more than four units
is preferredbut this direction was provided prior to further researchon the current density within
Burlingame and review of the 2009 agreement.
The need for consent of all unit owners to increase density within the subdivision raises the
question of whether the city should look at furthering the housing component. With completion
of Phase III, the subdivision will contain 256 units, with only two units unbuilt: the two lots that
214
Page 5 of 5
are being considered with development of Parcel C. Besides being designated for single-family
development, all unit owners, currently 177 units, would have to vote to increase the density
allowed in the subdivision. Staff is requesting direction on whether to move forward with the
multi-family concept or pause on incorporating housing into the project.Staff is concerned that
getting 100 percent buy-in to increase density may beunrealistic; however, with the design of the
housing limited to the two lots and not on Parcel C, a housing option could be moved forward on
a separate design and entitlement track.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends confirmation of the Hillside design concept and requests
direction on aspects of the project including the initial design of the ECE center, parking, and furthering
the housing component of the project.
EXHIBITS:
Attachment A: Hillside design concept
Attachment B: Streetside design concept
Attachment C: Outreach summaries
Attachment D: Resolution Nos. 99 and 82 (Series of 2009)
215
RG 27BRG 2BRG 3BRG 4BRG 12BRG 11BRG 6BRG 10BRG 9BRG 21BRG 28BRG 17BRG 22BRG 23BRG 24BRG 16BRG 14B.1RG 14BRG 31B1RG 20BRG 1BRG27B1P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P11-01911-02P11-03P11-04P11-05P11-06P11-07P11-08P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P14-8P14-7P14-6P14-5P14-4P14-3P14-2P14-1P14-941224912105448615VANACCESSIBLEVANACCESSIBLESSSS SSSSSSDDSSSTPCDSEEEEEEEEE EEE E EE EEWVWVWVWV WVCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOWVEEEWVEEEEX. COAEL. VAULTFLOW LINEOF 1' SWALE ASPHALT PARKING EXISTING BUS PULL OUT
WATER FOUNTAIN
AND METER
12" IRRIGATION RE-USE LINE AS-BUILTS PROVIDED
BY MCLAUGHLIN RINCON
HC APPROX LOCATION 6" PVC PIPE(45° VERTICAL BENDAT PUMP IN MANHOLE)24" RCP 18" RCP 18" RCP12" RCP
18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP 8" CPP 8" CPP24" RCP6" PVC24" RCPINV=7808.40'STORM MANHOLERIM=7818.36' 24" RCP INV IN=7810.56'6" PVC INV OUT =7813.17'24" RCP INV OUT =7810.71'8" CMP INVOUT=7809.89'IRRIGATION INLET BOX12" INV OUT=7804.42'STMH RIM = 7811.17'INV. IN 12"=7805.57'INV. 12"(CAPPED)=7806.32'INV. 6" PVC=PUMP @ FLANGE=7807.02'BOTTOM OF MH=7801.48'18 LF 24"STORM LINE12 LF OF 8"STORM PIPE8" INV IN7815.61'STMH RIM =7819.80'24" RCP N. INV. IN=7813.90'18" RCP S. INV. IN=7814.30'24" RCP E. INV. OUT=7813.72'12" PVC PIPE 12' PVC PIPE (CAPPED AT MANHOLE)1.5' DIA INLET RIM=7816.60'8" CPP N. INV.=7812.60'8" CPP S.E INV.=7812.60'4" PVC W. INV.=7812.60'2X2 INLET RIM=7807.65'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7806.15'18"RCP S.E. INV.=7806.25'2X3 INLET RIM=7807.85'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7805.95'18"RCP N.E. INV.=7805.00'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.0'18"RCP W. INV. OUT=7816.95'15"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.95'INV OUT=7809.3'INV=7809.1INV=7806.5INV=7817.40'INV 18" RCP=7817.222X2 INLET RIM=7819.40'24"RCP S. INV.OUT=7816.85'15"RCP E. INV. IN=7816.85'18"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.85'INV 12" CPP=7817.49'INV OUT=7817.11'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.45'18"RCP S. INV.=7817.80'18" RCPINV OUT 6" CPP=7818.22 INV 6" CPP=7816.61INV=7816.33INV=7815.6712" CPP INV=7805.651.5' DIA INLET RIM=7808.20'8" CPP N.W. INV.=7806.40'8" CPP S.E INV.=7806.40'INV IN=7812.1'
STORM INLET RIM=7822.08'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=16.08'
18" RCP N. INV. OUT=15.88'
8" CPPINV. IN=7818.33'4" PVC ROOF DRAININV. IN=7819.31'19" DIA RIM=7818.10'8" CPP INV. OUT=15.15'19" DIA RIM=7817.53'8" CPP INV. OUT=13.94'19" DIA INLET RIM=7817.00'8" CPP N. INV. IN=13.27''8" CPP S. INV. OUT0=13.27'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.62'INV. OUT=17.65'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.61'INV. OUT=17.67'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.63'INV. OUT=17.65'8" CPPINV. IN=17.86'8" CPPINV. OUT=17.69'STORM INLET RIM=7845.50'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=41.05'
18" RCP N. INV. OUT=41.00'
STORM INLET RIM=7832.75'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=28.05'
18" RCP N. INV. OUT=27.95'
STAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.62'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.57'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7818.97'AS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINESE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERSE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERAS-BUILTPROPOSED SECONDARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.89'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7818.09'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.48'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.40'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.52'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBELEV. = 7816.65'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #75RIM = 7820.96'INV. IN = 7809.94'INV. OUT = 7809.74'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #76RIM = 7825.21'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. OUT = 7814.94'SE AS-BUILT SMH #77RIM = 7827.43'INV. OUT = 7816.75'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7814.64'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7817.69'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7813.84'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7816.34' AS-BUILT SEWER SERVICEELEV = 7818.17'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7821.18'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7823.43'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.05'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.31'AS-BUILTSEWER SERVICE CAPT.P.ELEV. = 7826.16'9B 18" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.83'INV OUT 18" = 7835.83'8B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7837.27'INV IN 12" = 7832.64'INV OUT 15" = 7832.30'6B 1 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV OUT 15" = 7832.21'12B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV IN 15" (W) = 7831.59'INV IN 15" (N)= 7831.27'INV OUT 18" = 7831.10'10B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7839.38'INV OUT 18" = 7835.86'11B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7837.40'INV IN 15" = 7831.96'INV OUT 15" = 7831.72'13B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7832.99'INV IN 18" = 7828.37'INV OUT 18" = 7827.78'15B1 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7832.30'INV IN 12" = 7826.79INV IN 18" = 7826.62'INV OUT 18" = 7826.52'5B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7828.38'INV IN 18" = 7823.59'INV IN 4" = 7823.63'INV OUT 18" = 7823.45'4B1 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7831.90'INV OUT 12" = 7826.81'4B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7829.87'INV IN 12" = 7825.00'INV OUT 12" = 7824.97'1B2 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7828.03'INV IN 18" = 7822.89'INV IN 12" = 7822.67'INV IN 4" = 7823.27' (No pipe-cutout only)INV OUT 18" = 7822.23'3B 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7822.16'INV OUT 18" = 7821.87'2B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7821.86'INV OUT 18" = 7821.55'30B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7825.92'INV IN 18" = 7820.67'INV OUT 18" = 7820.47'J-SFDB#1-3' x 3' INLETRIM = 7820.93'INV OUT 24" = 7816.59'ORIFICE EL = 7816.98'J-6A1-4 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7821.45'INV IN 24"(S) = 7814.70'INV IN 24"(N) = 7814.52'INV OUT 24" = 7814.35'I-6A 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.80'INV IN 18" = 7813.99'INV IN 24" = 7814.95'INV OUT 24" = 7814.78'ORIFICE EL = 7718.02'J6A2 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7819.30'INV IN 24" = 7815.27'INV OUT 24" = 7814.98'J6A3 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7820.02'INV IN 10" = 7815.61'INV OUT 12" = 7815.48'I6B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.92'INV IN 12" = 7816.08'INV OUT 18" = 7815.91'TEMP 12" INLETRIM = 7818.93'INV OUT 10" = 7816.84'J-EX1 STORM MH (5' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7819.80'INV IN 24"(W) = 7813.80'INV IN 18"(S)(EX) = 7814.31'INV OUT 24" = 7813.30'131.2 LF-12" HDPE12" Stub outBuried at time of survey2.43%8.47 LF-12" HDPE25.8%27.4 LF-15" RCP1.24%25.9 LF-15" RCP1.73%39.4 LF-15" RCP2.73%93.0 LF-18" RCP2.94%27.1 LF-18" RCP4.28%47.4 LF-18" RCP6.19%38.1 LF-18" RCP0.15%25.9 LF-12" HDPE8.89%68.9 LF-12" HDPE2.63%21.0 LF-18" RCP1.71%15.0 LF18" RCP2.13%36.2 LF-18" RCP2.43%106.4 LF-18" RCP5.16%115.1 LF-24" HDPE1.64%10.6 LF24" RCP2.45%10.7 LF24" RCP0.28%20.0 LF18" RCP1.05%13.2 LF12" RCP2.26%81.9 LF-10" HDPE0.93%4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7821.09'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7820.65'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.53'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.56'48 LF-24" RCP1.15%15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7806.56'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.22'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.45'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7812.24'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7805.96'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7806.24'INV OUT CPELEV = 7806.18'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.20'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.07'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.13'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.06'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7816.97'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.30'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7818.00'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.95'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7819.05'15 IN INV CPELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.67'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.32'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.12'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7825.66'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7829.96'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7831.76'SUMP ELEV = 7815.27' 12" CPPELEV = 7816.88'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7815.88'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.41'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.10'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.62'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7828.51'WVD
WCTEEEWVSDYHDYHWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVEEEESSSDgasWVWVWVSSSWVWVHYDWVWVEEHYDHYD WVWVWVWVWVWVCCTTWVWVWVWIV WVWVIV IV IVIVIVGVgasgasgasTCTCTCD
CENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT10.5' WIDE STORM SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 3 AND 45.0' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OFBURLINGAME RANCH II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC.DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OFASPEN3.5' UTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3TRANSIT EASEMENTCENTERLINE 4' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 124' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENT24' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3SNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTLOT 2LOT 1LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5CONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENTBURLINGAME RANCH 1 CONDOMINIUMCONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENT187,412 Sq Ft4.302 Ac.37,502 Sq Ft0.861 Ac.LOT 34,542 Sq Ft0.104 Ac.LOT 44,486 Sq Ft0.103 Ac.HARMONY ROAD194,015 Sq Ft4.454 Ac.L23b2.11'6.11'S36°52'14"W 112.09'S17°50'24"E51.80'N78°19'26"E 94.46'S78°19'26"W 94.46'N17°50'24"W51.80'N36°52'14"E 112.09'LR2LR3188.85'209.33'CR10CR11CR12CR13CR14CR15CR16CR17CR14bCR14cCR14aCT1CT1aCT1bCT1cN34°25'37"E 204.32'N00°13'53"E 231.68'N22°29'54"W 398.18'S84°27'15"W 92.93'S33°44'31"W 135.08'L26S16°53'41"W 112.15'L18L19L21L23aL20L22L24L25L27C5C6C7C8S08°15'49"E 85.05'N72°16'44"W 73.19'S05°47'34"E 85.45'37.08'57.38'LT6LT7LT8LT9PARK CTRACT 1TRACT 3TRACT 3TRACT 1PARK CLOT 3LOT 4HARMONY ROADFORGE ROADMINING STOCK PARKWAYPAEPCKE DRIVEP12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P12-12P12-13P12-14P12-15P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P11-01P11-04P11-05P11-07P11-08P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-05P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P11-07P11-08+ 29.50+ 29.1129.13 ++ TW 28+/- BW 24.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.030354040.50 + +29.42+ TW 34+ TW 33+ TW 32FF2=7838.90FF1=7828.00FF2=7843.00FF1=7832.10FF1=7843.00FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7832.40FF1=7821.50FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7842.23FF1= 7831.33FF2=7843.40FF1= 7832.50FF2=7841.57FF1= 7830.67P12P14P11C12A13E11E15B13B14P13C12(attach)F14(b)F14(a)MATCH EXBS 100.00TS 100.00MH 100.00CB 100.00HPS 100.00BC 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00TW 100.00FFE 100.00100.00LP 100.00RIM 7836.89RIM 7836.89RIM 7837.40RIM 7837.27RIM 7832.9940.0039.6639.30TW 39.0039.3039.3028.75LP 38.50LP 38.75LP 36.75LP 36.75TW 34.5028.6028.4047.0038.00TW 42.50TW 48.00TW 49.00BW 45.00BW 38.00LP 36.7529.00TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 38.00BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 34.00TW 34.00BW 32.00TW 32.00BW 29.00TW 50.00TW 50.0049.0048.00BW 46.50BW 47.50LP36.3037.8038.805%3.7%3.4%5.0%5.0%5.0%2%4.0%28.10BW 29.00TW 40.002.5%2.0%28.1228.1028.00EOA 27.74EOA 27.353.8%2.7%27.00BW 23.00TW 26.00TW 26.001.4%37.00BW 44.00TW 43.00BW 38.0018%39.502%2%BW 38.00TW 44.00TW 46.00BW 42.50TW 60.00BW 54.00TW 51.00BW 43.00TW 49.00BW 40.0044.00BW 54.00TW 60.00TW 48.0043.00BW 39.00TW 49.00BW 41.00BW 53.00TW 57.00TW 43.00BW 37.00TW 46.00BW 44.00BW 34.00TW 41.00TW 32.00BW 29.00BW 46.00TW 48.00BW 47.00TW 43.33TW 45.0040.00BW 35.00TW 39.0034.0022.251.5%1.6%21.672.9%2.0%22.003.5%21.97TOC 22.635.0%TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.6321.5021.501.0%BW 22.004.8%EOC 22.4822.6721.5827.502.5%22.6722.67EOC 22.48EOC 22.4822.103.5%22.053.5%39.2226.5026.00EOC 28.305.0%27.00TW 37.00BW 35.00TW 35.00BW 33.0027.453.5%2.0%7832783178307829TOC 22.6736.0035.0033.0032.0031.0030.0029.00EOC 28.00EOA 26.4028.0028.0027.0028.0028.0028.00TW 38.75TW 37.00TW 32.50TW 33.50TW 35.50TW 34.50TW 37.75TW 36.50TW 38.5037.0038.0039.003.33%16%EOC 22.4222.49782678277828TOC 32.50EOC 32.34 31.942%TOC 32.50TOC 31.29EOC 32.344.0% 31.59EOC 31.1330.6021.00TW 22.55BW 21.00TW 22.00BW 20.69TW 22.65BW 21.10TBC 20.85TBC 20.55TBC 21.0578347833LP 29.2541.50TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.25TOC 41.67EOC 41.44TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.2541.25TOC 30.6729.80EOC 30.4931.50TOC 30.67 31.84 31.342.70%3.70%TOC 42.96TOC 42.96DECK 42.96EOC 42.76TW 40.00BW 35.00TW 40.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 32.00TOC 32.004.3%30.6231.25TOC 42.33TOC 42.33EOC 42.173.4%42.0041.102.0%FL 20.00FL 21.00EOC 30.54EOC 30.54TOC 30.671.5%27.0029.0029.0030.0030.0030.2030.203.2%30.203.3% 33.00EOC 31.823.3%31.14EOC 42.82EOC 42.82EOC 42.8242.612.2%42.312.0%42.204.2%35.0029.0030.00TOC 32.0078307829BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 32.00BW 31.00BW 30.00TW 35.50TW 35.00LP 40.50TOC 44.00TOC 44.00EOC 43.75EOC 43.75TOC 32.96EOC 32.80TOC 32.96EOC 32.80EOC 31.8242.9643.004.5%2.5%32.0042.502.0%31.5632.6132.6332.301.5%2.0%4.8%30.502.0%26.0031.0024.614.4%EOC 42.853.5%2.0%3.0%EOA24.13TW 28.00EOA 22.2021.60EOA 20.95TOC 22.63EOC 22.42EOC 22.4222.30EOC 22.42EOA42.32BW40.50EOA39.90EOA39.66EOA38.00EOA34.224.0%4.0%EOA24.774.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%27.5028.9327.502.5%2.0%27.9032.904.8%4.5%4.8%41.2743.5043.142.0%2.0%43.50EOC 43.07EOC 19.30EOA 27.40EOC 20.40EOC 20.7025.002.7%3.5%27.282.0%2.0%2.0%27.4025.003.6%3.5%4.0%TOC 29.00EOC 28.872.0%TOC 27.96EOC 27.80TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.3327.3328.25TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0042.61EOC 40.8144.502.6%2.0%2.6%32.202.0%31.6241.62TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.33TOC 34.00EOC 33.84TOC 32.962.0%33.0032.10TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0033.0032.413.2%41.12TW 38.12BW 36.12TW41.50BW 38.50TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90BW 31.00TW 33.12TW 35.62TW 38.12BW 36.12TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90EOA 41.72EOA 41.16EOA 41.16BW 38.50TW41.50TW41.00EOA 41.72TW41.00BW 34.00TW42.00BW38.00TW42.00TW38.00BW34.002.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%TW31.00BW 28.00LP 29.75EOC 27.9031.5027.502.3%27.502.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 31.00EOC 30.862.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.002.0%2.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.0027.503.7%2.3%44.702.0%1.5%TOC 34.00EOC 33.8430.5231.5033.4430.5030.5033.69TOC 45.0032.2033.5433.0044.0043.0043.0042.9042.4043.2143.0341.7541.29TOC 42.29EOC 42.1241.5840.40EOC 40.2639.7640.6441.50EOC 44.8044.255.0%43.75TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00TOC 33.00EOC 32.782.5%TOC 45.00EOC 44.8044.105.0%3.5%2.0%2.6%1.9%TOC 42.29EOC 42.0730.67TOC 30.33TOC30.33TOC 30.33EOC 30.1330.0030.5530.002.0%3.0%3.0%EOC 30.132.5%TOC 30.29EOC 30.10TOC 41.33EOC 41.16TOC 41.33EOC 41.1640.505.0%30.5029.504.3%5.0%TOC 41.33EOC 41.13TOC 41.33EOC 41.1340.7740.685.0%5.0%1.5%29.773.5%3.0%29.505.0%4.5%TBC 40.50TBC 41.60TOC 31.33TOC 31.33EOC 31.16EOC 31.1641.6241.1229.5028.5028.0027.5030.832.1%30.832.1%2.6%2.0%4.3%30.3327.502.5%3.2%2.3%2.5%2.7%2.5%2.0%2.0%2.0%7828EOC 28.06EOC 27.96BW 35.50 32.88 LP 31.50TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.0029.00EOC 28.822%2%2%EOC 28.84TOC 29.0037.00TOC 39.82EOC 39.82EOC 39.882%EOC 39.73TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00EOC 28.83EOC 28.83EOC 28.83TOC 29.002%2%2%EOC 39.73EOC 39.7339.403.0%3.0%BW 35.003.0%EOC 31.82EOC 31.892.0%EOC 31.6578317830 2.0%31.502.0%EOC 42.9242.5041.17EOC 40.71EOC 42.9842.52EOC 40.3239.701.0%2.0%2.8%2.8%TOC 31.3330.501.0%TOW 41.50BOW 37.50TOW 36.50BOW 33.00BOW 32.00TOW 36.502.9%3.7%32.602.4%2.4%32.6032.40TOC 33.003.3%TW 44.00BW 42.00TW 41.50BW 39.50TW 39.00BW 37.00TW 36.50BW 34.50TW 34.00BW 33.00EOC 30.86EOC 30.8630.73TOC 31.00TOC 31.00TOC 31.00EOC 30.7930.393.0%5.0%EOC 30.79EOC 30.794.4%4.1%TOC 31.0029.8030.3830.382.8%5.0%28.403.0%FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00RG 27BRG 2BRG 3BRG 4BRG 12BRG 11BRG 6BRG 10BRG 9BRG 21BRG 28BRG 17BRG 22BRG 23BRG 24BRG 16BRG 14B.1RG 14BRG 31B1RG 20BRG 1BRG27B1P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P11-01911-02P11-03P11-04P11-05P11-06P11-07P11-08P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P14-8P14-7P14-6P14-5P14-4P14-3P14-2P14-1P14-941224912105448615VANACCESSIBLEVANACCESSIBLESSSS SSSSSSDDSSSTPCDSEEEEEEEEE EEE E EE EEWVWVWVWV WVCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOWVEEEWVEEEEX. COAEL. VAULTFLOW LINEOF 1' SWALE ASPHALT PARKING EXISTING BUS PULL OUT
WATER FOUNTAIN
AND METER
12" IRRIGATION RE-USE LINE AS-BUILTS PROVIDED
BY MCLAUGHLIN RINCON
HC APPROX LOCATION 6" PVC PIPE(45° VERTICAL BENDAT PUMP IN MANHOLE)24" RCP 18" RCP 18" RCP12" RCP
18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP 8" CPP 8" CPP24" RCP6" PVC24" RCPINV=7808.40'STORM MANHOLERIM=7818.36' 24" RCP INV IN=7810.56'6" PVC INV OUT =7813.17'24" RCP INV OUT =7810.71'8" CMP INVOUT=7809.89'IRRIGATION INLET BOX12" INV OUT=7804.42'STMH RIM = 7811.17'INV. IN 12"=7805.57'INV. 12"(CAPPED)=7806.32'INV. 6" PVC=PUMP @ FLANGE=7807.02'BOTTOM OF MH=7801.48'18 LF 24"STORM LINE12 LF OF 8"STORM PIPE8" INV IN7815.61'STMH RIM =7819.80'24" RCP N. INV. IN=7813.90'18" RCP S. INV. IN=7814.30'24" RCP E. INV. OUT=7813.72'12" PVC PIPE 12' PVC PIPE (CAPPED AT MANHOLE)1.5' DIA INLET RIM=7816.60'8" CPP N. INV.=7812.60'8" CPP S.E INV.=7812.60'4" PVC W. INV.=7812.60'2X2 INLET RIM=7807.65'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7806.15'18"RCP S.E. INV.=7806.25'2X3 INLET RIM=7807.85'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7805.95'18"RCP N.E. INV.=7805.00'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.0'18"RCP W. INV. OUT=7816.95'15"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.95'INV OUT=7809.3'INV=7809.1INV=7806.5INV=7817.40'INV 18" RCP=7817.222X2 INLET RIM=7819.40'24"RCP S. INV.OUT=7816.85'15"RCP E. INV. IN=7816.85'18"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.85'INV 12" CPP=7817.49'INV OUT=7817.11'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.45'18"RCP S. INV.=7817.80'18" RCPINV OUT 6" CPP=7818.22 INV 6" CPP=7816.61INV=7816.33INV=7815.6712" CPP INV=7805.651.5' DIA INLET RIM=7808.20'8" CPP N.W. INV.=7806.40'8" CPP S.E INV.=7806.40'INV IN=7812.1'
STORM INLET RIM=7822.08'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=16.08'
18" RCP N. INV. OUT=15.88'
8" CPPINV. IN=7818.33'4" PVC ROOF DRAININV. IN=7819.31'19" DIA RIM=7818.10'8" CPP INV. OUT=15.15'19" DIA RIM=7817.53'8" CPP INV. OUT=13.94'19" DIA INLET RIM=7817.00'8" CPP N. INV. IN=13.27''8" CPP S. INV. OUT0=13.27'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.62'INV. OUT=17.65'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.61'INV. OUT=17.67'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.63'INV. OUT=17.65'8" CPPINV. IN=17.86'8" CPPINV. OUT=17.69'STORM INLET RIM=7845.50'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=41.05'
18" RCP N. INV. OUT=41.00'
STORM INLET RIM=7832.75'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=28.05'
18" RCP N. INV. OUT=27.95'
STAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.62'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.57'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7818.97'AS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINESE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERSE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERAS-BUILTPROPOSED SECONDARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.89'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7818.09'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.48'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.40'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.52'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBELEV. = 7816.65'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #75RIM = 7820.96'INV. IN = 7809.94'INV. OUT = 7809.74'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #76RIM = 7825.21'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. OUT = 7814.94'SE AS-BUILT SMH #77RIM = 7827.43'INV. OUT = 7816.75'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7814.64'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7817.69'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7813.84'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7816.34' AS-BUILT SEWER SERVICEELEV = 7818.17'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7821.18'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7823.43'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.05'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.31'AS-BUILTSEWER SERVICE CAPT.P.ELEV. = 7826.16'9B 18" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.83'INV OUT 18" = 7835.83'8B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7837.27'INV IN 12" = 7832.64'INV OUT 15" = 7832.30'6B 1 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV OUT 15" = 7832.21'12B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV IN 15" (W) = 7831.59'INV IN 15" (N)= 7831.27'INV OUT 18" = 7831.10'10B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7839.38'INV OUT 18" = 7835.86'11B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7837.40'INV IN 15" = 7831.96'INV OUT 15" = 7831.72'13B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7832.99'INV IN 18" = 7828.37'INV OUT 18" = 7827.78'15B1 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7832.30'INV IN 12" = 7826.79INV IN 18" = 7826.62'INV OUT 18" = 7826.52'5B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7828.38'INV IN 18" = 7823.59'INV IN 4" = 7823.63'INV OUT 18" = 7823.45'4B1 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7831.90'INV OUT 12" = 7826.81'4B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7829.87'INV IN 12" = 7825.00'INV OUT 12" = 7824.97'1B2 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7828.03'INV IN 18" = 7822.89'INV IN 12" = 7822.67'INV IN 4" = 7823.27' (No pipe-cutout only)INV OUT 18" = 7822.23'3B 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7822.16'INV OUT 18" = 7821.87'2B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7821.86'INV OUT 18" = 7821.55'30B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7825.92'INV IN 18" = 7820.67'INV OUT 18" = 7820.47'J-SFDB#1-3' x 3' INLETRIM = 7820.93'INV OUT 24" = 7816.59'ORIFICE EL = 7816.98'J-6A1-4 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7821.45'INV IN 24"(S) = 7814.70'INV IN 24"(N) = 7814.52'INV OUT 24" = 7814.35'I-6A 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.80'INV IN 18" = 7813.99'INV IN 24" = 7814.95'INV OUT 24" = 7814.78'ORIFICE EL = 7718.02'J6A2 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7819.30'INV IN 24" = 7815.27'INV OUT 24" = 7814.98'J6A3 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7820.02'INV IN 10" = 7815.61'INV OUT 12" = 7815.48'I6B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.92'INV IN 12" = 7816.08'INV OUT 18" = 7815.91'TEMP 12" INLETRIM = 7818.93'INV OUT 10" = 7816.84'J-EX1 STORM MH (5' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7819.80'INV IN 24"(W) = 7813.80'INV IN 18"(S)(EX) = 7814.31'INV OUT 24" = 7813.30'131.2 LF-12" HDPE12" Stub outBuried at time of survey2.43%8.47 LF-12" HDPE25.8%27.4 LF-15" RCP1.24%25.9 LF-15" RCP1.73%39.4 LF-15" RCP2.73%93.0 LF-18" RCP2.94%27.1 LF-18" RCP4.28%47.4 LF-18" RCP6.19%38.1 LF-18" RCP0.15%25.9 LF-12" HDPE8.89%68.9 LF-12" HDPE2.63%21.0 LF-18" RCP1.71%15.0 LF18" RCP2.13%36.2 LF-18" RCP2.43%106.4 LF-18" RCP5.16%115.1 LF-24" HDPE1.64%10.6 LF24" RCP2.45%10.7 LF24" RCP0.28%20.0 LF18" RCP1.05%13.2 LF12" RCP2.26%81.9 LF-10" HDPE0.93%4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7821.09'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7820.65'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.53'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.56'48 LF-24" RCP1.15%15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7806.56'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.22'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.45'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7812.24'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7805.96'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7806.24'INV OUT CPELEV = 7806.18'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.20'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.07'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.13'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.06'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7816.97'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.30'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7818.00'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.95'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7819.05'15 IN INV CPELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.67'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.32'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.12'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7825.66'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7829.96'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7831.76'SUMP ELEV = 7815.27' 12" CPPELEV = 7816.88'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7815.88'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.41'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.10'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.62'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7828.51'WVD
WCTEEEWVSDYHDYHWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVEEEESSSDgasWVWVWVSSSWVWVHYDWVWVEEHYDHYD WVWVWVWVWVWVCCTTWVWVWVWIV WVWVIV IV IVIVIVGVgasgasgasTCTCTCD
CENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT10.5' WIDE STORM SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 3 AND 45.0' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OFBURLINGAME RANCH II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC.DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OFASPEN3.5' UTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3TRANSIT EASEMENTCENTERLINE 4' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 124' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENT24' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3SNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTLOT 2LOT 1LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5CONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENTBURLINGAME RANCH 1 CONDOMINIUMCONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENT187,412 Sq Ft4.302 Ac.37,502 Sq Ft0.861 Ac.LOT 34,542 Sq Ft0.104 Ac.LOT 44,486 Sq Ft0.103 Ac.HARMONY ROAD194,015 Sq Ft4.454 Ac.L23b2.11'6.11'S36°52'14"W 112.09'S17°50'24"E51.80'N78°19'26"E 94.46'S78°19'26"W 94.46'N17°50'24"W51.80'N36°52'14"E 112.09'LR2LR3188.85'209.33'CR10CR11CR12CR13CR14CR15CR16CR17CR14bCR14cCR14aCT1CT1aCT1bCT1cN34°25'37"E 204.32'N00°13'53"E 231.68'N22°29'54"W 398.18'S84°27'15"W 92.93'S33°44'31"W 135.08'L26S16°53'41"W 112.15'L18L19L21L23aL20L22L24L25L27C5C6C7C8S08°15'49"E 85.05'N72°16'44"W 73.19'S05°47'34"E 85.45'37.08'57.38'LT6LT7LT8LT9PARK CTRACT 1TRACT 3TRACT 3TRACT 1PARK CLOT 3LOT 4HARMONY ROADFORGE ROADMINING STOCK PARKWAYPAEPCKE DRIVEP12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P12-12P12-13P12-14P12-15P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P11-01P11-04P11-05P11-07P11-08P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-05P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P11-07P11-08+ 29.50+ 29.1129.13 ++ TW 28+/- BW 24.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.030354040.50 + +29.42+ TW 34+ TW 33+ TW 32FF2=7838.90FF1=7828.00FF2=7843.00FF1=7832.10FF1=7843.00FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7832.40FF1=7821.50FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7842.23FF1= 7831.33FF2=7843.40FF1= 7832.50FF2=7841.57FF1= 7830.67P12P14P11C12A13E11E15B13B14P13C12(attach)F14(b)F14(a)MATCH EXBS 100.00TS 100.00MH 100.00CB 100.00HPS 100.00BC 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00TW 100.00FFE 100.00100.00LP 100.00RIM 7836.89RIM 7836.89RIM 7837.40RIM 7837.27RIM 7832.9940.0039.6639.30TW 39.0039.3039.3028.75LP 38.50LP 38.75LP 36.75LP 36.75TW 34.5028.6028.4047.0038.00TW 42.50TW 48.00TW 49.00BW 45.00BW 38.00LP 36.7529.00TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 38.00BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 34.00TW 34.00BW 32.00TW 32.00BW 29.00TW 50.00TW 50.0049.0048.00BW 46.50BW 47.50LP36.3037.8038.805%3.7%3.4%5.0%5.0%5.0%2%4.0%28.10BW 29.00TW 40.002.5%2.0%28.1228.1028.00EOA 27.74EOA 27.353.8%2.7%27.00BW 23.00TW 26.00TW 26.001.4%37.00BW 44.00TW 43.00BW 38.0018%39.502%2%BW 38.00TW 44.00TW 46.00BW 42.50TW 60.00BW 54.00TW 51.00BW 43.00TW 49.00BW 40.0044.00BW 54.00TW 60.00TW 48.0043.00BW 39.00TW 49.00BW 41.00BW 53.00TW 57.00TW 43.00BW 37.00TW 46.00BW 44.00BW 34.00TW 41.00TW 32.00BW 29.00BW 46.00TW 48.00BW 47.00TW 43.33TW 45.0040.00BW 35.00TW 39.0034.0022.251.5%1.6%21.672.9%2.0%22.003.5%21.97TOC 22.635.0%TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.6321.5021.501.0%BW 22.004.8%EOC 22.4822.6721.5827.502.5%22.6722.67EOC 22.48EOC 22.4822.103.5%22.053.5%39.2226.5026.00EOC 28.305.0%27.00TW 37.00BW 35.00TW 35.00BW 33.0027.453.5%2.0%7832783178307829TOC 22.6736.0035.0033.0032.0031.0030.0029.00EOC 28.00EOA 26.4028.0028.0027.0028.0028.0028.00TW 38.75TW 37.00TW 32.50TW 33.50TW 35.50TW 34.50TW 37.75TW 36.50TW 38.5037.0038.0039.003.33%16%EOC 22.4222.49782678277828TOC 32.50EOC 32.34 31.942%TOC 32.50TOC 31.29EOC 32.344.0% 31.59EOC 31.1330.6021.00TW 22.55BW 21.00TW 22.00BW 20.69TW 22.65BW 21.10TBC 20.85TBC 20.55TBC 21.0578347833LP 29.2541.50TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.25TOC 41.67EOC 41.44TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.2541.25TOC 30.6729.80EOC 30.4931.50TOC 30.67 31.84 31.342.70%3.70%TOC 42.96TOC 42.96DECK 42.96EOC 42.76TW 40.00BW 35.00TW 40.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 32.00TOC 32.004.3%30.6231.25TOC 42.33TOC 42.33EOC 42.173.4%42.0041.102.0%FL 20.00FL 21.00EOC 30.54EOC 30.54TOC 30.671.5%27.0029.0029.0030.0030.0030.2030.203.2%30.203.3% 33.00EOC 31.823.3%31.14EOC 42.82EOC 42.82EOC 42.8242.612.2%42.312.0%42.204.2%35.0029.0030.00TOC 32.0078307829BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 32.00BW 31.00BW 30.00TW 35.50TW 35.00LP 40.50TOC 44.00TOC 44.00EOC 43.75EOC 43.75TOC 32.96EOC 32.80TOC 32.96EOC 32.80EOC 31.8242.9643.004.5%2.5%32.0042.502.0%31.5632.6132.6332.301.5%2.0%4.8%30.502.0%26.0031.0024.614.4%EOC 42.853.5%2.0%3.0%EOA24.13TW 28.00EOA 22.2021.60EOA 20.95TOC 22.63EOC 22.42EOC 22.4222.30EOC 22.42EOA42.32BW40.50EOA39.90EOA39.66EOA38.00EOA34.224.0%4.0%EOA24.774.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%27.5028.9327.502.5%2.0%27.9032.904.8%4.5%4.8%41.2743.5043.142.0%2.0%43.50EOC 43.07EOC 19.30EOA 27.40EOC 20.40EOC 20.7025.002.7%3.5%27.282.0%2.0%2.0%27.4025.003.6%3.5%4.0%TOC 29.00EOC 28.872.0%TOC 27.96EOC 27.80TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.3327.3328.25TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0042.61EOC 40.8144.502.6%2.0%2.6%32.202.0%31.6241.62TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.33TOC 34.00EOC 33.84TOC 32.962.0%33.0032.10TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0033.0032.413.2%41.12TW 38.12BW 36.12TW41.50BW 38.50TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90BW 31.00TW 33.12TW 35.62TW 38.12BW 36.12TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90EOA 41.72EOA 41.16EOA 41.16BW 38.50TW41.50TW41.00EOA 41.72TW41.00BW 34.00TW42.00BW38.00TW42.00TW38.00BW34.002.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%TW31.00BW 28.00LP 29.75EOC 27.9031.5027.502.3%27.502.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 31.00EOC 30.862.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.002.0%2.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.0027.503.7%2.3%44.702.0%1.5%TOC 34.00EOC 33.8430.5231.5033.4430.5030.5033.69TOC 45.0032.2033.5433.0044.0043.0043.0042.9042.4043.2143.0341.7541.29TOC 42.29EOC 42.1241.5840.40EOC 40.2639.7640.6441.50EOC 44.8044.255.0%43.75TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00TOC 33.00EOC 32.782.5%TOC 45.00EOC 44.8044.105.0%3.5%2.0%2.6%1.9%TOC 42.29EOC 42.0730.67TOC 30.33TOC30.33TOC 30.33EOC 30.1330.0030.5530.002.0%3.0%3.0%EOC 30.132.5%TOC 30.29EOC 30.10TOC 41.33EOC 41.16TOC 41.33EOC 41.1640.505.0%30.5029.504.3%5.0%TOC 41.33EOC 41.13TOC 41.33EOC 41.1340.7740.685.0%5.0%1.5%29.773.5%3.0%29.505.0%4.5%TBC 40.50TBC 41.60TOC 31.33TOC 31.33EOC 31.16EOC 31.1641.6241.1229.5028.5028.0027.5030.832.1%30.832.1%2.6%2.0%4.3%30.3327.502.5%3.2%2.3%2.5%2.7%2.5%2.0%2.0%2.0%7828EOC 28.06EOC 27.96BW 35.50 32.88 LP 31.50TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.0029.00EOC 28.822%2%2%EOC 28.84TOC 29.0037.00TOC 39.82EOC 39.82EOC 39.882%EOC 39.73TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00EOC 28.83EOC 28.83EOC 28.83TOC 29.002%2%2%EOC 39.73EOC 39.7339.403.0%3.0%BW 35.003.0%EOC 31.82EOC 31.892.0%EOC 31.6578317830 2.0%31.502.0%EOC 42.9242.5041.17EOC 40.71EOC 42.9842.52EOC 40.3239.701.0%2.0%2.8%2.8%TOC 31.3330.501.0%TOW 41.50BOW 37.50TOW 36.50BOW 33.00BOW 32.00TOW 36.502.9%3.7%32.602.4%2.4%32.6032.40TOC 33.003.3%TW 44.00BW 42.00TW 41.50BW 39.50TW 39.00BW 37.00TW 36.50BW 34.50TW 34.00BW 33.00EOC 30.86EOC 30.8630.73TOC 31.00TOC 31.00TOC 31.00EOC 30.7930.393.0%5.0%EOC 30.79EOC 30.794.4%4.1%TOC 31.0029.8030.3830.382.8%5.0%28.403.0%FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00RG 27BRG 2BRG 3BRG 4BRG 12BRG 11BRG 6BRG 10BRG 9BRG 21BRG 28BRG 17BRG 22BRG 23BRG 24BRG 16BRG 14B.1RG 14BRG 31B1RG 20BRG 1BRG27B1P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P11-01911-02P11-03P11-04P11-05P11-06P11-07P11-08P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P14-8P14-7P14-6P14-5P14-4P14-3P14-2P14-1P14-941224912105448615VANACCESSIBLE
VANACCESSIBLESSSS SSSSSSDDSSSTPCDSEEEEEEE
E
E EEE E
EE EE
WVW V
WV
WV
WV
CO
CO
COCO
CO
C O
CO
CO
WVEEEWVEEE
EX. COAEL. VAULTFLOW LINE
OF 1' SWALE
ASPHALT PARKING
EXISTIN
G
B
U
S
P
U
L
L
O
U
T
WATER FOUNTAIN
AND METER
12" IRRIGATION RE-USE LINE AS-BUILTS PROVIDED
BY MCLAUGHLIN RINCON
HC
APPROX LOCATION 6" PVC PIPE
(45° VERTICAL BEND
AT PUMP IN MANHOLE)
24" RCP
18" RCP 18" RCP1
2
"
R
C
P
18" RCP18" R
C
P
18" RCP18" RCP1
8
"
R
C
P
8
"
C
P
P
8" CPP
24" RCP6" PVC24" RCP
INV=7808.40'
STORM MANHOLE
RIM=7818.36'
24" RCP INV IN=7810.56'
6" PVC INV OUT =7813.17'
24" RCP INV OUT =7810.71'
8" CMP INV
OUT=7809.89'
IRRIGATION INLET BOX
12" INV OUT=7804.42'
STMH RIM = 7811.17'
INV. IN 12"=7805.57'
INV. 12"(CAPPED)=7806.32'
INV. 6" PVC=PUMP @ FLANGE=7807.02'
BOTTOM OF MH=7801.48'18 LF 24"STORM LINE12 LF OF 8"
STORM PIPE
8" INV IN
7815.61'
STMH RIM =7819.80'
24" RCP N. INV. IN=7813.90'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=7814.30'
24" RCP E. INV. OUT=7813.72'
12" PVC PIPE
12' PVC PIPE (CAPPED AT MANHOLE)
1.5' DIA INLET RIM=7816.60'
8" CPP N. INV.=7812.60'
8" CPP S.E INV.=7812.60'
4" PVC W. INV.=7812.60'
2X2 INLET RIM=7807.65'
18"RCP N.W. INV.=7806.15'
18"RCP S.E. INV.=7806.25'
2X3 INLET RIM=7807.85'
18"RCP N.W. INV.=7805.95'
18"RCP N.E. INV.=7805.00'
2X2 INLET RIM=7819.0'
18"RCP W. INV. OUT=7816.95'
15"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.95'
INV OUT=7809.3'
INV=7809.1
INV=7806.5
INV=7817.40'
INV 18" RCP=7817.22
2X2 INLET RIM=7819.40'
24"RCP S. INV.OUT=7816.85'
15"RCP E. INV. IN=7816.85'
18"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.85'
INV 12" CPP=7817.49'
INV OUT=7817.11'
2X2 INLET RIM=7819.45'
18"RCP S. INV.=7817.80'
18" RCP
INV OUT 6" CPP=7818.22 INV 6" CPP=7816.61
INV=7816.33
INV=7815.67
12" CPP
INV=7805.65
1.5' DIA INLET RIM=7808.20'
8" CPP N.W. INV.=7806.40'
8" CPP S.E INV.=7806.40'
INV IN=7812.1'
STORM INLET RIM=7822.08'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=16.08'
18" RCP N. INV. OUT=15.88'
8" CPPINV. IN=7818.33'4" PVC ROOF DRAININV. IN=7819.31'19" DIA RIM=7818.10'8" CPP INV. OUT=15.15'19" DIA RIM=7817.53'8" CPP INV. OUT=13.94'19" DIA INLET RIM=7817.00'8" CPP N. INV. IN=13.27''8" CPP S. INV. OUT0=13.27'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.62'
INV. OUT=17.65'
1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.61'
INV. OUT=17.67'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.63'INV. OUT=17.65'8" CPPINV. IN=17.86'8" CPPINV. OUT=17.69'STORM INLET RIM=7845.50'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=41.05'
18" RCP N. INV. OUT=41.00'
STORM INLET RIM=7832.75'
18" RCP S. INV. IN=28.05'
18" RCP N. INV. OUT=27.95'
STAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.62'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.57'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7818.97'AS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINESE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERSE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERAS-BUILTPROPOSED SECONDARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.89'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7818.09'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.48'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.40'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.52'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBELEV. = 7816.65'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #75RIM = 7820.96'INV. IN = 7809.94'INV. OUT = 7809.74'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #76RIM = 7825.21'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. OUT = 7814.94'SE AS-BUILT SMH #77RIM = 7827.43'INV. OUT = 7816.75'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7814.64'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7817.69'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7813.84'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7816.34' AS-BUILT SEWER SERVICEELEV = 7818.17'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7821.18'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7823.43'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.05'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.31'AS-BUILTSEWER SERVICE CAPT.P.ELEV. = 7826.16'9B 18" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.83'INV OUT 18" = 7835.83'8B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7837.27'INV IN 12" = 7832.64'INV OUT 15" = 7832.30'6B 1 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV OUT 15" = 7832.21'12B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV IN 15" (W) = 7831.59'INV IN 15" (N)= 7831.27'INV OUT 18" = 7831.10'10B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7839.38'INV OUT 18" = 7835.86'11B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7837.40'INV IN 15" = 7831.96'INV OUT 15" = 7831.72'13B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7832.99'INV IN 18" = 7828.37'INV OUT 18" = 7827.78'15B1 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7832.30'INV IN 12" = 7826.79INV IN 18" = 7826.62'INV OUT 18" = 7826.52'5B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7828.38'INV IN 18" = 7823.59'INV IN 4" = 7823.63'INV OUT 18" = 7823.45'4B1 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7831.90'INV OUT 12" = 7826.81'4B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7829.87'INV IN 12" = 7825.00'INV OUT 12" = 7824.97'1B2 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7828.03'INV IN 18" = 7822.89'INV IN 12" = 7822.67'INV IN 4" = 7823.27' (No pipe-cutout only)INV OUT 18" = 7822.23'3B 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7822.16'INV OUT 18" = 7821.87'2B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7821.86'INV OUT 18" = 7821.55'30B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7825.92'INV IN 18" = 7820.67'INV OUT 18" = 7820.47'J-SFDB#1-3' x 3' INLETRIM = 7820.93'INV OUT 24" = 7816.59'ORIFICE EL = 7816.98'J-6A1-4 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7821.45'INV IN 24"(S) = 7814.70'INV IN 24"(N) = 7814.52'INV OUT 24" = 7814.35'I-6A 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.80'INV IN 18" = 7813.99'INV IN 24" = 7814.95'INV OUT 24" = 7814.78'ORIFICE EL = 7718.02'J6A2 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7819.30'INV IN 24" = 7815.27'INV OUT 24" = 7814.98'J6A3 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7820.02'INV IN 10" = 7815.61'INV OUT 12" = 7815.48'I6B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.92'INV IN 12" = 7816.08'INV OUT 18" = 7815.91'TEMP 12" INLETRIM = 7818.93'INV OUT 10" = 7816.84'J-EX1 STORM MH (5' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7819.80'INV IN 24"(W) = 7813.80'INV IN 18"(S)(EX) = 7814.31'INV OUT 24" = 7813.30'131.2 LF-12" HDPE12" Stub outBuried at time of survey2.43%8.47 LF-12" HDPE25.8%27.4 LF-15" RCP1.24%25.9 LF-15" RCP1.73%39.4 LF-15" RCP2.73%93.0 LF-18" RCP2.94%27.1 LF-18" RCP4.28%47.4 LF-18" RCP6.19%38.1 LF-18" RCP0.15%25.9 LF-12" HDPE8.89%68.9 LF-12" HDPE2.63%21.0 LF-18" RCP1.71%15.0 LF18" RCP2.13%36.2 LF-18" RCP2.43%106.4 LF-18"
R
C
P
5.16%115.1 LF-24" HDPE1.64%10.6 LF24" RCP2.45%10.7 LF24" RCP0.28%20.0 LF18" RCP1.05%13.2 LF12" RCP2.26%81.9 LF-10" HDPE0.93%4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7821.09'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7820.65'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.53'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.56'48 LF-24" RCP
1.15%
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7806.56'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7809.22'15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7809.45'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7812.24'
CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPE
ELEV = 7805.96'
CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPE
ELEV = 7806.24'
INV OUT CP
ELEV = 7806.18'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7817.20'
CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
SUMP ELEV = 7817.07'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7817.13'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7817.06'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7817.17'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7817.17'
CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
SUMP ELEV = 7816.97'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7817.30'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7818.00'
CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
SUMP ELEV = 7817.95'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7819.05'
15 IN INV CPELEV = 7817.17'
CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INLET ELEV = 7836.67'
3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INLET ELEV = 7827.32'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INLET ELEV = 7827.12'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INLET ELEV = 7825.66'
1.2' VERT. PVC CAP
INLET ELEV = 7829.96'
1.2' VERT. PVC CAP
INLET ELEV = 7831.76'
SUMP ELEV = 7815.27'
12" CPP
ELEV = 7816.88'
15" CONC. PIPE
ELEV = 7815.88'
3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INLET ELEV = 7837.41'
3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INLET ELEV = 7837.10'
3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INLET ELEV = 7836.62'
3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE
INLET ELEV = 7828.51'WVD
WCTEEEWVSDYHDYHWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVEEEESSSDgasWVWVWVSSSWVWVHYDWVWVEEHYDHYD WVWVWVWVWVWVCCTTWVWVWVW
IV
WVWVIV
IV
IV
IV
IV
GV
gas
gas gasTCTCTCD
CENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT10.5' WIDE STORM SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 3 AND 45.0' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OFBURLINGAME RANCH II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC.DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OFASPEN3.5' UTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3TRANSIT EASEMENTCENTERLINE 4' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 124' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENT24' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3SNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTLOT 2LOT 1LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5CONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENTBURLINGAME RANCH 1 CONDOMINIUMCONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENT187,412 Sq Ft4.302 Ac.37,502 Sq Ft0.861 Ac.LOT 34,542 Sq Ft0.104 Ac.LOT 44,486 Sq Ft0.103 Ac.HARMONY ROAD194,015 Sq Ft4.454 Ac.L23b2.11'6.11'S36°52'14"W 112.09'S17°50'24"E51.80'N78°19'26"E 94.46'S78°19'26"W 94.46'N17°50'24"W51.80'N36°52'14"E 112.09'LR2LR3188.85'209.33'CR10CR11CR12CR13CR14CR15CR16CR17CR14bCR14cCR14aCT1CT1aCT1bCT1cN34°25'37"E 204.32'N00°13'53"E 231.68'N22°29'54"W 398.18'S84°27'15"W 92.93'S33°44'31"W 135.08'L26S16°53'41"W 112.15'L18L19L21L23aL20L22L24L25L27C5C6C7C8S08°15'49"E 85.05'N72°16'44"W 73.19'S05°47'34"E 85.45'37.08'57.38'LT6LT7LT8LT9PARK CTRACT 1TRACT 3TRACT 3TRACT 1PARK CLOT 3LOT 4HARMONY ROADFORGE ROADMINING STOCK PARKWAYPAEPCKE DRIVEP12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P12-12P12-13P12-14P12-15P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P11-01P11-04P11-05P11-07P11-08P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-05P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P11-07P11-08+ 29.50+ 29.1129.13 ++ TW 28+/- BW 24.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.030354040.50 + +29.42+ TW 34+ TW 33+ TW 32FF2=7838.90FF1=7828.00FF2=7843.00FF1=7832.10FF1=7843.00FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7832.40FF1=7821.50FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7842.23FF1= 7831.33FF2=7843.40FF1= 7832.50FF2=7841.57FF1= 7830.67P12P14P11C12A13E11E15B13B14P13C12(attach)F14(b)F14(a)MATCH EXBS 100.00TS 100.00MH 100.00CB 100.00HPS 100.00BC 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00TW 100.00FFE 100.00100.00LP 100.00RIM 7836.89RIM 7836.89RIM 7837.40RIM 7837.27RIM 7832.9940.0039.6639.30TW 39.0039.3039.3028.75LP 38.50LP 38.75LP 36.75LP 36.75TW 34.5028.6028.4047.0038.00TW 42.50TW 48.00TW 49.00BW 45.00BW 38.00LP 36.7529.00TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 38.00BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 34.00TW 34.00BW 32.00TW 32.00BW 29.00TW 50.00TW 50.0049.0048.00BW 46.50BW 47.50LP36.3037.8038.805%3.7%
3.4%5.0%5.0%5.0%2%4.0%28.10BW 29.00TW 40.002.5%2.0%28.1228.1028.00EOA 27.74EOA 27.353.8%2.7%27.00BW 23.00TW 26.00TW 26.001.4%37.00BW 44.00TW 43.00BW 38.0018%39.502%2%BW 38.00TW 44.00TW 46.00BW 42.50TW 60.00BW 54.00TW 51.00BW 43.00TW 49.00BW 40.0044.00BW 54.00TW 60.00TW 48.0043.00BW 39.00TW 49.00BW 41.00BW 53.00TW 57.00TW 43.00BW 37.00TW 46.00BW 44.00BW 34.00TW 41.00TW 32.00BW 29.00BW 46.00TW 48.00BW 47.00TW 43.33TW 45.0040.00BW 35.00TW 39.0034.0022.251.5%1.6%21.672.9%2.0%22.003.5%21.97TOC 22.635.0%TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.6321.5021.501.0%BW 22.004.8%EOC 22.4822.6721.5827.502.5%22.6722.67EOC 22.48EOC 22.4822.103.5%22.053.5%39.2226.5026.00EOC 28.305.0%27.00TW 37.00BW 35.00TW 35.00BW 33.0027.453.5%2.0%7832783178307829TOC 22.6736.0035.0033.0032.0031.0030.0029.00EOC 28.00EOA 26.4028.0028.0027.0028.0028.0028.00TW 38.75TW 37.00TW 32.50TW 33.50TW 35.50TW 34.50TW 37.75TW 36.50TW 38.5037.0038.0039.003.33%16%EOC 22.4222.49782678277828TOC 32.50EOC 32.34 31.942%TOC 32.50TOC 31.29EOC 32.344.0% 31.59EOC 31.1330.6021.00TW 22.55BW 21.00TW 22.00BW 20.69TW 22.65BW 21.10TBC 20.85TBC 20.55TBC 21.0578347833LP 29.2541.50TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.25TOC 41.67EOC 41.44TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.2541.25TOC 30.6729.80EOC 30.4931.50TOC 30.67 31.84 31.342.70%3.70%TOC 42.96TOC 42.96DECK 42.96EOC 42.76TW 40.00BW 35.00TW 40.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 32.00TOC 32.004.3%30.6231.25TOC 42.33TOC 42.33EOC 42.173.4%42.0041.102.0%FL 20.00FL 21.00EOC 30.54EOC 30.54TOC 30.671.5%27.0029.0029.0030.0030.0030.2030.203.2%30.203.3% 33.00EOC 31.823.3%31.14EOC 42.82EOC 42.82EOC 42.8242.612.2%42.312.0%42.204.2%35.0029.0030.00TOC 32.0078307829BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 32.00BW 31.00BW 30.00TW 35.50TW 35.00LP 40.50TOC 44.00TOC 44.00EOC 43.75EOC 43.75TOC 32.96EOC 32.80TOC 32.96EOC 32.80EOC 31.8242.9643.004.5%2.5%32.0042.502.0%31.5632.6132.6332.301.5%2.0%4.8%30.502.0%26.0031.0024.614.4%EOC 42.853.5%2.0%3.0%EOA24.13TW 28.00EOA 22.2021.60EOA 20.95TOC 22.63EOC 22.42EOC 22.4222.30EOC 22.42EOA42.32BW40.50EOA39.90EOA39.66EOA38.00EOA34.224.0%
4.0%EOA24.774.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%27.5028.9327.502.5%2.0%27.9032.904.8%4.5%4.8%41.2743.5043.142.0%2.0%43.50EOC 43.07EOC 19.30EOA 27.40EOC 20.40EOC 20.7025.002.7%3.5%27.282.0%2.0%2.0%27.4025.003.6%3.5%4.0%TOC 29.00EOC 28.872.0%TOC 27.96EOC 27.80TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.3327.3328.25TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0042.61EOC 40.8144.502.6%2.0%2.6%32.202.0%31.6241.62TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.33TOC 34.00EOC 33.84TOC 32.962.0%33.0032.10TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0033.0032.413.2%41.12TW 38.12BW 36.12TW41.50BW 38.50TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90BW 31.00TW 33.12TW 35.62TW 38.12BW 36.12TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90EOA 41.72EOA 41.16EOA 41.16BW 38.50TW41.50TW41.00EOA 41.72TW41.00BW 34.00TW42.00BW38.00TW42.00TW38.00BW34.002.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%TW31.00BW 28.00LP 29.75EOC 27.9031.5027.502.3%27.502.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 31.00EOC 30.862.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.002.0%2.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.0027.503.7%2.3%44.702.0%1.5%TOC 34.00EOC 33.8430.5231.5033.4430.5030.5033.69TOC 45.0032.2033.5433.0044.0043.0043.0042.9042.4043.2143.0341.7541.29TOC 42.29EOC 42.1241.5840.40EOC 40.2639.7640.6441.50EOC 44.8044.255.0%43.75TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00TOC 33.00EOC 32.782.5%TOC 45.00EOC 44.8044.105.0%3.5%2.0%2.6%1.9%TOC 42.29EOC 42.0730.67TOC 30.33TOC30.33TOC 30.33EOC 30.1330.0030.5530.002.0%3.0%3.0%EOC 30.132.5%TOC 30.29EOC 30.10TOC 41.33EOC 41.16TOC 41.33EOC 41.1640.505.0%30.5029.504.3%5.0%TOC 41.33EOC 41.13TOC 41.33EOC 41.1340.7740.685.0%5.0%1.5%29.773.5%3.0%29.505.0%4.5%TBC 40.50TBC 41.60TOC 31.33TOC 31.33EOC 31.16EOC 31.1641.6241.1229.5028.5028.0027.5030.832.1%30.832.1%2.6%2.0%4.3%30.3327.502.5%3.2%2.3%2.5%2.7%2.5%2.0%2.0%2.0%7828EOC 28.06EOC 27.96BW 35.50 32.88 LP 31.50TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.0029.00EOC 28.822%
2%
2%EOC 28.84TOC 29.0037.00TOC 39.82EOC 39.82EOC 39.882%EOC 39.73TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00EOC 28.83EOC 28.83EOC 28.83TOC 29.002%2%2%EOC 39.73EOC 39.7339.403.0%3.0%BW 35.003.0%EOC 31.82EOC 31.892.0%EOC 31.657831
7830 2.0%31.502.0%EOC 42.9242.5041.17EOC 40.71EOC 42.9842.52EOC 40.3239.701.0%2.0%2.8%2.8%TOC 31.3330.501.0%TOW 41.50BOW 37.50TOW 36.50BOW 33.00BOW 32.00TOW 36.502.9%3.7%32.602.4%2.4%32.6032.40TOC 33.003.3%TW 44.00BW 42.00TW 41.50BW 39.50TW 39.00BW 37.00TW 36.50BW 34.50TW 34.00BW 33.00EOC 30.86EOC 30.8630.73TOC 31.00TOC 31.00TOC 31.00EOC 30.7930.393.0%5.0%EOC 30.79EOC 30.794.4%4.1%TOC 31.0029.8030.3830.382.8%5.0%28.403.0%FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00PARKING
43 STALLS THIS LEVEL
(44 NEEDED PER PROGRAM)
871 SFTODDLER B
774 SFTODDLER A
820 SFINFANT B
813 SFINFANT A
420 SFLOBBY
95 SFVEST.
CIRC.
755 SFGROSS MOTOR
49 SFPS
214 SFMECH.
120 SFELEC.
77 SFTELE.
28 SFJAN.
1212 SF
TODDLER
PLAYGROUND
F.
F
.
E
.
=
7
8
3
3
'COMPACT983 SF
INFANT
PLAYGROUND
160 SFLND90 SFBUGGY
249 SF
CUST
STG
746 SF
TODDLER
PLAYGROUND
52 SFPS
94 SF
WATER
ENTRY
76 SFRR
58 SFRR
STG
RR
RR
STG
STG
RRBED 1
BED 2
LND
RR
LND
RR
BED 2
BED 1RR
HOUSING
1017 SFUNIT 1 1002 SFUNIT 2
ELEV
79 SFLACT.
CAR SEATS
STG
TRAIL
UTILITY EASEMENT
COVERED CARPORTS
FOR STAFF
PAEPCKE DRIVE
HARMONY ROADC
A
R
S
E
A
T
S
V
112 SFREC.
4
X04.1
5
X04.1
EXISTING PHASE 3
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
PROPOSED OFFSITE STORM
CONVEYANCE PIPE
EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
EXISTING STORM PIPE
VEHICLE
ACCESS
MAIN
ENTRANCE
LINE OF FLOOR
ABOVE
1005 SFPRESCHOOL A
988 SFPRESCHOOL B
165 SF
STAFF
LOUNGE
171 SFKITCHEN
60 SFRR
60 SFRR
F.F.E. = 7846'
ELEV
1010 SFPRESCHOOL C
2058 SF
PRESCHOOL
PLAYGROUND
50 SFRR
50 SFPS
35 SFJAN.
166 SF
DIR.
OFF.
255 SF
LEARNING
RESOURCE
213 SFCONF.
OPEN TO
BELOW
CIRC.
RRBED 1
BED 2
LND
RR
LND
RR
BED 2
BED 1RR
HOUSING
1163 SFUNIT 31003 SFUNIT 4
BED 3
STG
RR
RR
RR
STG
STG.TRAIL
O
P
E
N
T
O
B
E
L
O
W
PAEPCKE DRIVE
HARMONY ROAD4
X04.1
5
X04.1
EXISTING PHASE 3
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
UTILITY EASEMENT
PROPOSED OFFSITE STORM
CONVEYANCE PIPE
EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
EXISTING STORM PIPE
HOUSING PARKING
(8 SPACES)
4
X04.1
EXISTING PHASE 3
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
VEHICLE
ACCESS
UTILITY EASEMENT
PROPOSED OFFSITE STORM
CONVEYANCE PIPE
EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
EXISTING STORM PIPE
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
X04.0
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
REVIEW
2022-3
8/05/2022
HILLSIDE ECE -
PLANSASPEN BURLINGAME ECECity of Aspen
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
KEY FEATURES:
DIRECT ON-GRADE ACCESS TO MAIN
ENTRY OF ECE
HOUSING IS DETACHED, PART OF
NEIGHBORHOOD
PROVIDES 43 PARKING STALLS, ALL
SURFACE PARKING
PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND IS SOUTH
FACING
2 POSSIBLE POINTS OF ACCESS FOR
VEHICLES
INFANT & TODDLER PLAYGROUNDS AT
GRADE
GROSS MOTOR ROOM ON MAIN FLOOR
ON-GRADE ENTRY
GREATER CONNECTION TO NATURAL
LANDSCAPE AND GREAT VIEWS
MEETS FIRE DEPARTMENTS FIRE ACCESS
REQUIREMENT
ECE HAS ITS OWN SENSE OF PLACE
PARTIALLY UNDERGROUND TO
INCORPORATE INSULATING VALUES OF THE
SITE
DAYLIGHT HARVESTING WITHIN THE
CLASSROOMS IMPROVES WITH THE ABILITY
TO SHAPE THE ROOF
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
SITE CHALLENGES:
PORTIONS OF THE INFANT & TODDLER
PLAYGROUNDS HAVE SOME NORTH FACING
AREAS
VISUALLY EXPANSIVE PARKING FOOTPRINT
WITH 43 PARKING STALLS
ENTRY IS PRIMARILY NORTH FACING
BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS VERY TIGHT TO
SITE BOUNDARIES
REQUIRES MOVING THE MOST DIRT
LIMITED AREA FOR SNOW STORAGE
LESS CAPACITY FOR INCREASING HOUSING
UNITS (AND ASSOCIATED PARKING)
TRAIL IS PUSHED TO BOUNDARY OF SITE
1" = 30'-0"1HILLSIDE ECE - FIRST FLOOR
1" = 30'-0"2HILLSIDE ECE - SECOND FLOOR
ECE AREA:
13,843 GSF
HOUSING AREA:
5,538 GSF
(3) 2 BEDROOM UNITS
(1) 3 BEDROOM UNITS
PARKING AREA:
13,752 SF (ECE SURFACE PARKING)
2,919 SF (HOUSING COVERED PARKING)
N N
1" = 30'-0"0HILLSIDE ECE - HOUSING PARKING
N
ABBREVIATIONS:
BALC BALCONY
BLDG BUILDING
CIRC CIRCULATION
CONF CONFERENCE
CUST CUSTODIAL
DIR DIRECTOR
DN DOWN
ELEC ELECTRICAL
ELEV ELEVATOR
F.F.E FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
JAN JANITORIAL
LACT LACTATION
LND LAUNDRY
MECH MECHANICAL
OFF OFFICE
RR REST ROOM
REC RECEPTION
PS PLAY STORAGE
STG STORAGE
TELE TELECOM
VEST VESTIBULE
216
OPT 2 - 1ST FL (7833')12' - 0"
OPT 2 - 2ND FL (7846')25' - 0"
OPT 2 - CRAWL SPACE
(7828')7' - 0"
CIRC.PRESCHOOL B PRESCHOOL
PLAYGROUND
INFANT B CIRC.
STAFF
LOUNGE
3:12
3:12
LACT.LND
CRAWL SPACE
3:12
NATURAL LIGHT
OPT 2 - HOUSING 2ND FL
(7849')28' - 0"
OPT 2 - HOUSING 1ST FL
(7837')16' - 0"
OPT 2 - HOUSING
GARAGE (7827')6' - 0"
UNIT 4
HOUSING GARAGE
BED 2BED 1
UNIT 2BED 2BED 1
1:12
3:12
NATURAL LIGHT
2' - 11 1/4"TO MIDPOINT OF HIGHEST ROOFCOVERED CARPORTS
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
X04.1
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
REVIEW
2022-3
8/05/2022
HILLSIDE ECE -
SECTIONS & ECE
3DVIEWSASPEN BURLINGAME ECECity of Aspen
6" = 1'-0"2VIEW LOOKING NORTH WEST
6" = 1'-0"3VIEW LOOKING SOUTH EAST
1/8" = 1'-0"4HILLSIDE ECE - HOUSING SECTION
6" = 1'-0"1VIEW LOOKING AT ECE ENTRANCE
1/8" = 1'-0"5HILLSIDE ECE - ECE SECTION
217
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
X04.2
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
REVIEW
2022-3
8/05/2022
HILLSIDE ECE -
HOUSING 3D VIEWSASPEN BURLINGAME ECECity of Aspen
PLEASE NOTE:
FOR REFERENCE - EXISTING PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE MASSING SHOWN
WITHOUT WINDOWS
6" = 1'-0"1VIEW LOOKING EAST
6" = 1'-0"2VIEW FROM NORTH EAST CORNER
6" = 1'-0"3VIEW LOOKING WEST FROM HARMONY RD
6" = 1'-0"4VIEW LOOKING DOWN PAEPCKE DRIVE
218
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
X04.3
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
REVIEW
2022-3
8/05/2022
HILLSIDE ECE -
ADDITIONAL 3D
VIEWSASPEN BURLINGAME ECECity of Aspen
6" = 1'-0"4AERIAL VIEW LOOKING WEST
6" = 1'-0"2AERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
6" = 1'-0"3AERIAL VIEW LOOKING EAST
6" = 1'-0"1AERIAL VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PLEASE NOTE:
FOR REFERENCE - EXISTING PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE MASSING SHOWN
WITHOUT WINDOWS
219
RG 27BRG 2BRG 3BRG 4BRG 12BRG 11BRG 6BRG 10BRG 9BRG 21BRG 28BRG 17BRG 22BRG 23BRG 24BRG 16BRG 14B.1RG 14BRG 31B1RG 20BRG 1BRG27B1P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P11-01911-02P11-03P11-04P11-05P11-06P11-07P11-08P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P14-8P14-7P14-6P14-5P14-4P14-3P14-2P14-1P14-941224912105448615VANACCESSIBLEVANACCESSIBLESSSS SSSSSSDDSSSTPCDSEEEEEEEEE EEE E EE E EWVWVWVWV WVCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOWVEEEWVEEEEX. COAEL. VAULTFLOW LINEOF 1' SWALE ASPHALT PARKING EXISTING BUS PULL OUTWATER FOUNTAINAND METER12" IRRIGATION RE-USE LINE AS-BUILTS PROVIDEDBY MCLAUGHLIN RINCONHC APPROX LOCATION 6" PVC PIPE(45° VERTICAL BENDAT PUMP IN MANHOLE)24" R CP 1 8" RC P 18" RCP12" RCP18" RCP18" R CP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP 8" CPP 8" CPP24" RCP6" PVC24" RCPINV=7808.40'STORM MANHOLERIM=7818.36' 24" RCP INV IN=7810.56'6" PVC INV OUT =7813.17'24" RCP INV OUT =7810.71'8" CMP INVOUT=7809.89'IRRIGATION INLET BOX12" INV OUT=7804.42'STMH RIM = 7811.17'INV. IN 12"=7805.57'INV. 12"(CAPPED)=7806.32'INV. 6" PVC=PUMP @ FLANGE=7807.02'BOTTOM OF MH=7801.48'18 LF 24"STORM LINE12 LF OF 8"STORM PIPE8" INV IN7815.61'STMH RIM =7819.80'24" RCP N. INV. IN=7813.90'18" RCP S. INV. IN=7814.30'24" RCP E. INV. OUT=7813.72'12" PVC PIPE 12' PVC PIPE (CAPPED AT MANHOLE)1.5' DIA INLET RIM=7816.60'8" CPP N. INV.=7812.60'8" CPP S.E INV.=7812.60'4" PVC W. INV.=7812.60'2X2 INLET RIM=7807.65'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7806.15'18"RCP S.E. INV.=7806.25'2X3 INLET RIM=7807.85'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7805.95'18"RCP N.E. INV.=7805.00'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.0'18"RCP W. INV. OUT=7816.95'15"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.95'INV OUT=7809.3'INV=7809.1INV=7806.5INV=7817.40'INV 18" RCP=7817.222X2 INLET RIM=7819.40'24"RCP S. INV.OUT=7816.85'15"RCP E. INV. IN=7816.85'18"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.85'INV 12" CPP=7817.49'INV OUT=7817.11'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.45'18"RCP S. INV.=7817.80'18" RCPINV OUT 6" CPP=7818.22 INV 6" CPP=7816.61INV=7816.33INV=7815.6712" CPP INV=7805.651.5' DIA INLET RIM=7808.20'8" CPP N.W. INV.=7806.40'8" CPP S.E INV.=7806.40'INV IN=7812.1'STORM INLET RIM=7822.08'18" RCP S. INV. IN=16.08'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=15.88'8" CPPINV. IN=7818.33'4" PVC ROOF DRAININV. IN=7819.31'19" DIA RIM=7818.10'8" CPP INV. OUT=15.15'19" DIA RIM=7817.53'8" CPP INV. OUT=13.94'19" DIA INLET RIM=7817.00'8" CPP N. INV. IN=13.27''8" CPP S. INV. OUT0=13.27'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.62'INV. OUT=17.65'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.61'INV. OUT=17.67'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.63'INV. OUT=17.65'8" CPPINV. IN=17.86'8" CPPINV. OUT=17.69'STORM INLET RIM=7845.50'18" RCP S. INV. IN=41.05'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=41.00'STORM INLET RIM=7832.75'18" RCP S. INV. IN=28.05'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=27.95'STAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.62'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.57'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7818.97'AS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINESE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERSE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERAS-BUILTPROPOSED SECONDARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.89'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7818.09'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.48'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.40'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.52'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBELEV. = 7816.65'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #75RIM = 7820.96'INV. IN = 7809.94'INV. OUT = 7809.74'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #76RIM = 7825.21'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. OUT = 7814.94'SE AS-BUILT SMH #77RIM = 7827.43'INV. OUT = 7816.75'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7814.64'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7817.69'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7813.84'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7816.34' AS-BUILT SEWER SERVICEELEV = 7818.17'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7821.18'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7823.43'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.05'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.31'AS-BUILTSEWER SERVICE CAPT.P.ELEV. = 7826.16'9B 18" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.83'INV OUT 18" = 7835.83'8B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7837.27'INV IN 12" = 7832.64'INV OUT 15" = 7832.30'6B 1 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV OUT 15" = 7832.21'12B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV IN 15" (W) = 7831.59'INV IN 15" (N)= 7831.27'INV OUT 18" = 7831.10'10B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7839.38'INV OUT 18" = 7835.86'11B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7837.40'INV IN 15" = 7831.96'INV OUT 15" = 7831.72'13B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7832.99'INV IN 18" = 7828.37'INV OUT 18" = 7827.78'15B1 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7832.30'INV IN 12" = 7826.79INV IN 18" = 7826.62'INV OUT 18" = 7826.52'5B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7828.38'INV IN 18" = 7823.59'INV IN 4" = 7823.63'INV OUT 18" = 7823.45'4B1 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7831.90'INV OUT 12" = 7826.81'4B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7829.87'INV IN 12" = 7825.00'INV OUT 12" = 7824.97'1B2 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7828.03'INV IN 18" = 7822.89'INV IN 12" = 7822.67'INV IN 4" = 7823.27' (No pipe-cutout only)INV OUT 18" = 7822.23'3B 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7822.16'INV OUT 18" = 7821.87'2B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7821.86'INV OUT 18" = 7821.55'30B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7825.92'INV IN 18" = 7820.67'INV OUT 18" = 7820.47'J-SFDB#1-3' x 3' INLETRIM = 7820.93'INV OUT 24" = 7816.59'ORIFICE EL = 7816.98'J-6A1-4 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7821.45'INV IN 24"(S) = 7814.70'INV IN 24"(N) = 7814.52'INV OUT 24" = 7814.35'I-6A 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.80'INV IN 18" = 7813.99'INV IN 24" = 7814.95'INV OUT 24" = 7814.78'ORIFICE EL = 7718.02'J6A2 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7819.30'INV IN 24" = 7815.27'INV OUT 24" = 7814.98'J6A3 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7820.02'INV IN 10" = 7815.61'INV OUT 12" = 7815.48'I6B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.92'INV IN 12" = 7816.08'INV OUT 18" = 7815.91'TEMP 12" INLETRIM = 7818.93'INV OUT 10" = 7816.84'J-EX1 STORM MH (5' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7819.80'INV IN 24"(W) = 7813.80'INV IN 18"(S)(EX) = 7814.31'INV OUT 24" = 7813.30'131.2 LF-12" HDPE12" Stub outBuried at time of survey2.43%8.47 LF-12" HDPE25.8%27.4 LF-15" RCP1.24%25.9 LF-15" RCP1.73%39.4 LF-15" RCP2.73%93.0 LF-18" RCP2.94%27.1 LF-18" RCP4.28%47.4 LF-18" RCP6.19%38.1 LF-18" RCP0.15%25.9 LF-12" HDPE8.89%68.9 LF-12" HDPE2.63%21.0 LF-18" RCP1.71%15.0 LF18" RCP2.13%36.2 LF-18" RCP2.43%106.4 LF-18" RCP5.16%115.1 LF-24" HDPE1.64%10.6 LF24" RCP2.45%10.7 LF24" RCP0.28%20.0 LF18" RCP1.05%13.2 LF12" RCP2.26%81.9 LF-10" HDPE0.93%4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7821.09'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7820.65'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.53'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.56'48 LF-24" RCP1.15%15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7806.56'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.22'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.45'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7812.24'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7805.96'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7806.24'INV OUT CPELEV = 7806.18'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.20'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.07'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.13'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.06'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7816.97'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.30'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7818.00'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.95'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7819.05'15 IN INV CPELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.67'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.32'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.12'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7825.66'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7829.96'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7831.76'SUMP ELEV = 7815.27' 12" CPPELEV = 7816.88'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7815.88'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.41'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.10'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.62'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7828.51'WVD WCTEEEWVSDYHDYHWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVEEEESSSDgasWVWVWVSSSWVWVHYDWVWVEEHYDHYD WVWVWVWVWVWVCCTTWVWVWVWIV WVWVIV IV IVIVIVGVgasgasgasTCTCTCDCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT10.5' WIDE STORM SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 3 AND 45.0' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OFBURLINGAME RANCH II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC.DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OFASPEN3.5' UTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3TRANSIT EASEMENTCENTERLINE 4' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 124' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENT24' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3SNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTLOT 2LOT 1LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5CONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENTBURLINGAME RANCH 1 CONDOMINIUMCONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENT187,412 Sq Ft4.302 Ac.37,502 Sq Ft0.861 Ac.LOT 34,542 Sq Ft0.104 Ac.LOT 44,486 Sq Ft0.103 Ac.HARMONY ROAD194,015 Sq Ft4.454 Ac.L23b2.11'6.11'S36°52'14"W 112.09'S17°50'24"E51.80'N78°19'26"E 94.46'S78°19'26"W 94.46'N17°50'24"W51.80'N36°52'14"E 112.09'LR2LR3188.85'209.33'CR10CR11CR12CR13CR14CR15CR16CR17CR14bCR14cCR14aCT1CT1aCT1bCT1cN34°25'37"E 204.32'N00°13'53"E 231.68'N22°29'54"W 398.18'S84°27'15"W 92.93'S33°44'31"W 135.08'L26S16°53'41"W 112.15'L18L19L21L23aL20L22L24L25L27C5C6C7C8S08°15'49"E 85.05'N72°16'44"W 73.19'S05°47'34"E 85.45'37.08'57.38'LT6LT7LT8LT9PARK CTRACT 1TRACT 3TRACT 3TRACT 1PARK CLOT 3LOT 4HARMONY ROADFORGE ROADMINING STOCK PARKWAYPAEPCKE DRIVEP12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P12-12P12-13P12-14P12-15P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P11-01P11-04P11-05P11-07P11-08P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-05P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P11-07P11-08+ 29.50+ 29.1129.13 ++ TW 28+/- BW 24.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.030354040.50 + +29.42+ TW 34+ TW 33+ TW 32FF2=7838.90FF1=7828.00FF2=7843.00FF1=7832.10FF1=7843.00FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7832.40FF1=7821.50FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7842.23FF1= 7831.33FF2=7843.40FF1= 7832.50FF2=7841.57FF1= 7830.67P12P14P11C12A13E11E15B13B14P13C12(attach)F14(b)F14(a)MATCH EXBS 100.00TS 100.00MH 100.00CB 100.00HPS 100.00BC 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00TW 100.00FFE 100.00100.00LP 100.00RIM 7836.89RIM 7836.89RIM 7837.40RIM 7837.27RIM 7832.9940.0039.6639.30TW 39.0039.3039.3028.75LP 38.50LP 38.75LP 36.75LP 36.75TW 34.5028.6028.4047.0038.00TW 42.50TW 48.00TW 49.00BW 45.00BW 38.00LP 36.7529.00TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 38.00BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 34.00TW 34.00BW 32.00TW 32.00BW 29.00TW 50.00TW 50.0049.0048.00BW 46.50BW 47.50LP36.3037.8038.805%3.7%3.4%5.0%5.0%5.0%2%4.0%28.10BW 29.00TW 40.002.5%2.0%28.1228.1028.00EOA 27.74EOA 27.353.8%2.7%27.00BW 23.00TW 26.00TW 26.001.4%37.00BW 44.00TW 43.00BW 38.0018%39.502%2%BW 38.00TW 44.00TW 46.00BW 42.50TW 60.00BW 54.00TW 51.00BW 43.00TW 49.00BW 40.0044.00BW 54.00TW 60.00TW 48.0043.00BW 39.00TW 49.00BW 41.00BW 53.00TW 57.00TW 43.00BW 37.00TW 46.00BW 44.00BW 34.00TW 41.00TW 32.00BW 29.00BW 46.00TW 48.00BW 47.00TW 43.33TW 45.0040.00BW 35.00TW 39.0034.0022.251.5%1.6%21.672.9%2.0%22.003.5%21.97TOC 22.635.0%TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.6321.5021.501.0%BW 22.004.8%EOC 22.4822.6721.5827.502.5%22.6722.67EOC 22.48EOC 22.4822.103.5%22.053.5%39.2226.5026.00EOC 28.305.0%27.00TW 37.00BW 35.00TW 35.00BW 33.0027.453.5%2.0%7832783178307829TOC 22.6736.0035.0033.0032.0031.0030.0029.00EOC 28.00EOA 26.4028.0028.0027.0028.0028.0028.00TW 38.75TW 37.00TW 32.50TW 33.50TW 35.50TW 34.50TW 37.75TW 36.50TW 38.5037.0038.0039.003.33 %16%EOC 22.4222.49782678277828TOC 32.50EOC 32.34 31.942%TOC 32.50TOC 31.29EOC 32.344.0% 31.59EOC 31.1330.6021.00TW 22.55BW 21.00TW 22.00BW 20.69TW 22.65BW 21.10TBC 20.85TBC 20.55TBC 21.0578347833LP 29.2541.50TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.25TOC 41.67EOC 41.44TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.2541.25TOC 30.6729.80EOC 30.4931.50TOC 30.67 31.84 31.342.70%3.70%TOC 42.96TOC 42.96DECK 42.96EOC 42.76TW 40.00BW 35.00TW 40.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 32.00TOC 32.004.3%30.6231.25TOC 42.33TOC 42.33EOC 42.173.4%42.0041.102.0%FL 20.00FL 21.00EOC 30.54EOC 30.54TOC 30.671.5%27.0029.0029.0030.0030.0030.2030.203.2%30.203.3% 33.00EOC 31.823.3%31.14EOC 42.82EOC 42.82EOC 42.8242.612.2%42.312.0%42.204.2%35.0029.0030.00TOC 32.0078307829BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 32.00BW 31.00BW 30.00TW 35.50TW 35.00LP 40.50TOC 44.00TOC 44.00EOC 43.75EOC 43.75TOC 32.96EOC 32.80TOC 32.96EOC 32.80EOC 31.8242.9643.004.5%2.5%32.0042.502.0%31.5632.6132.6332.301.5%2.0%4.8%30.502.0%26.0031.0024.614.4%EOC 42.853.5%2.0%3.0%EOA24.13TW 28.00EOA 22.2021.60EOA 20.95TOC 22.63EOC 22.42EOC 22.4222.30EOC 22.42EOA42.32BW40.50EOA39.90EOA39.66EOA38.00EOA34.224.0%4.0%EOA24.774.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%27.5028.9327.502.5%2.0%27.9032.904.8%4.5%4.8%41.2743.5043.142.0%2.0%43.50EOC 43.07EOC 19.30EOA 27.40EOC 20.40EOC 20.7025.002.7%3.5%27.282.0%2.0%2.0%27.4025.003.6%3.5%4.0%TOC 29.00EOC 28.872.0%TOC 27.96EOC 27.80TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.3327.3328.25TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0042.61EOC 40.8144.502.6%2.0%2.6%32.202.0%31.6241.62TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.33TOC 34.00EOC 33.84TOC 32.962.0%33.0032.10TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0033.0032.413.2%41.12TW 38.12BW 36.12TW41.50BW 38.50TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90BW 31.00TW 33.12TW 35.62TW 38.12BW 36.12TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90EOA 41.72EOA 41.16EOA 41.16BW 38.50TW41.50TW41.00EOA 41.72TW41.00BW 34.00TW42.00BW38.00TW42.00TW38.00BW34.002.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%TW31.00BW 28.00LP 29.75EOC 27.9031.5027.502.3%27.502.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 31.00EOC 30.862.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.002.0%2.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.0027.503.7%2.3%44.702.0%1.5%TOC 34.00EOC 33.8430.5231.5033.4430.5030.5033.69TOC 45.0032.2033.5433.0044.0043.0043.0042.9042.4043.2143.0341.7541.29TOC 42.29EOC 42.1241.5840.40EOC 40.2639.7640.6441.50EOC 44.8044.255.0%43.75TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00TOC 33.00EOC 32.782.5%TOC 45.00EOC 44.8044.105.0%3.5%2.0%2.6%1.9%TOC 42.29EOC 42.0730.67TOC 30.33TOC30.33TOC 30.33EOC 30.1330.0030.5530.002.0%3.0%3.0%EOC 30.132.5%TOC 30.29EOC 30.10TOC 41.33EOC 41.16TOC 41.33EOC 41.1640.505.0%30.5029.504.3%5.0%TOC 41.33EOC 41.13TOC 41.33EOC 41.1340.7740.685.0%5.0%1.5%29.773.5%3.0%29.505.0%4.5%TBC 40.50TBC 41.60TOC 31.33TOC 31.33EOC 31.16EOC 31.1641.6241.1229.5028.5028.0027.5030.832.1%30.832.1%2.6%2.0%4.3%30.3327.502.5%3.2%2.3%2.5%2.7%2.5%2.0%2.0%2.0%7828EOC 28.06EOC 27.96BW 35.50 32.88 LP 31.50TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.0029.00EOC 28.822%2%2%EOC 28.84TOC 29.0037.00TOC 39.82EOC 39.82EOC 39.882%EOC 39.73TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00EOC 28.83EOC 28.83EOC 28.83TOC 29.002%2%2%EOC 39.73EOC 39.7339.403.0%3.0%BW 35.003.0%EOC 31.82EOC 31.892.0%EOC 31.65783 17830 2.0%31.502.0%EOC 42.9242.5041.17EOC 40.71EOC 42.9842.52EOC 40.3239.701.0%2.0%2.8%2.8%TOC 31.3330.501.0%TOW 41.50BOW 37.50TOW 36.50BOW 33.00BOW 32.00TOW 36.502.9%3.7%32.602.4%2.4%32.6032.40TOC 33.003.3%TW 44.00BW 42.00TW 41.50BW 39.50TW 39.00BW 37.00TW 36.50BW 34.50TW 34.00BW 33.00EOC 30.86EOC 30.8630.73TOC 31.00TOC 31.00TOC 31.00EOC 30.7930.393.0%5.0%EOC 30.79EOC 30.794.4%4.1%TOC 31.0029.8030.3830.382.8%5.0%28.403.0%FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00RG 27BRG 2BRG 3BRG 4BRG 12BRG 11BRG 6BRG 10BRG 9BRG 21BRG 28BRG 17BRG 22BRG 23BRG 24BRG 16BRG 14B.1RG 14BRG 31B1RG 20BRG 1BRG27B1P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P11-01911-02P11-03P11-04P11-05P11-06P11-07P11-08P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P14-8P14-7P14-6P14-5P14-4P14-3P14-2P14-1P14-941224912105448615VANACCESSIBLEVANACCESSIBLESSSSSSSSSSDDSSSTPCDSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEWVWVWVWVWVCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOWVEEEWVEEEEX. COAEL. VAULTFLOW LINEOF 1' SWALEASPHALT PARKING EXISTING BUS PULL OUTWATER FOUNTAINAND METER12" IRRIGATION RE-USE LINE AS-BUILTS PROVIDEDBY MCLAUGHLIN RINCONHC APPROX LOCATION 6" PVC PIPE(45° VERTICAL BENDAT PUMP IN MANHOLE)24" RCP18" RCP 18" RCP12" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP 8" CPP 8" CPP24" RCP6" PVC24" RCPINV=7808.40'STORM MANHOLERIM=7818.36' 24" RCP INV IN=7810.56'6" PVC INV OUT =7813.17'24" RCP INV OUT =7810.71'8" CMP INVOUT=7809.89'IRRIGATION INLET BOX12" INV OUT=7804.42'STMH RIM = 7811.17'INV. IN 12"=7805.57'INV. 12"(CAPPED)=7806.32'INV. 6" PVC=PUMP @ FLANGE=7807.02'BOTTOM OF MH=7801.48'18 LF 24"STORM LINE12 LF OF 8"STORM PIPE8" INV IN7815.61'STMH RIM =7819.80'24" RCP N. INV. IN=7813.90'18" RCP S. INV. IN=7814.30'24" RCP E. INV. OUT=7813.72'12" PVC PIPE 12' PVC PIPE (CAPPED AT MANHOLE)1.5' DIA INLET RIM=7816.60'8" CPP N. INV.=7812.60'8" CPP S.E INV.=7812.60'4" PVC W. INV.=7812.60'2X2 INLET RIM=7807.65'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7806.15'18"RCP S.E. INV.=7806.25'2X3 INLET RIM=7807.85'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7805.95'18"RCP N.E. INV.=7805.00'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.0'18"RCP W. INV. OUT=7816.95'15"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.95'INV OUT=7809.3'INV=7809.1INV=7806.5INV=7817.40'INV 18" RCP=7817.222X2 INLET RIM=7819.40'24"RCP S. INV.OUT=7816.85'15"RCP E. INV. IN=7816.85'18"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.85'INV 12" CPP=7817.49'INV OUT=7817.11'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.45'18"RCP S. INV.=7817.80'18" RCPINV OUT 6" CPP=7818.22INV 6" CPP=7816.61INV=7816.33INV=7815.6712" CPPINV=7805.651.5' DIA INLET RIM=7808.20'8" CPP N.W. INV.=7806.40'8" CPP S.E INV.=7806.40'INV IN=7812.1'STORM INLET RIM=7822.08'18" RCP S. INV. IN=16.08'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=15.88'8" CPPINV. IN=7818.33'4" PVC ROOF DRAININV. IN=7819.31'19" DIA RIM=7818.10'8" CPP INV. OUT=15.15'19" DIA RIM=7817.53'8" CPP INV. OUT=13.94'19" DIA INLET RIM=7817.00'8" CPP N. INV. IN=13.27''8" CPP S. INV. OUT0=13.27'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.62'INV. OUT=17.65'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.61'INV. OUT=17.67'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.63'INV. OUT=17.65'8" CPPINV. IN=17.86'8" CPPINV. OUT=17.69'STORM INLET RIM=7845.50'18" RCP S. INV. IN=41.05'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=41.00'STORM INLET RIM=7832.75'18" RCP S. INV. IN=28.05'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=27.95'STAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.62'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.57'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7818.97'AS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINESE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERSE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERAS-BUILTPROPOSED SECONDARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.89'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7818.09'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.48'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.40'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.52'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBELEV. = 7816.65'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #75RIM = 7820.96'INV. IN = 7809.94'INV. OUT = 7809.74'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #76RIM = 7825.21'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. OUT = 7814.94'SE AS-BUILT SMH #77RIM = 7827.43'INV. OUT = 7816.75'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7814.64'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7817.69'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7813.84'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7816.34' AS-BUILT SEWER SERVICEELEV = 7818.17'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7821.18'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7823.43'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.05'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.31'AS-BUILTSEWER SERVICE CAPT.P.ELEV. = 7826.16'9B 18" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.83'INV OUT 18" = 7835.83'8B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7837.27'INV IN 12" = 7832.64'INV OUT 15" = 7832.30'6B 1 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV OUT 15" = 7832.21'12B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV IN 15" (W) = 7831.59'INV IN 15" (N)= 7831.27'INV OUT 18" = 7831.10'10B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7839.38'INV OUT 18" = 7835.86'11B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7837.40'INV IN 15" = 7831.96'INV OUT 15" = 7831.72'13B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7832.99'INV IN 18" = 7828.37'INV OUT 18" = 7827.78'15B1 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7832.30'INV IN 12" = 7826.79INV IN 18" = 7826.62'INV OUT 18" = 7826.52'5B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7828.38'INV IN 18" = 7823.59'INV IN 4" = 7823.63'INV OUT 18" = 7823.45'4B1 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7831.90'INV OUT 12" = 7826.81'4B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7829.87'INV IN 12" = 7825.00'INV OUT 12" = 7824.97'1B2 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7828.03'INV IN 18" = 7822.89'INV IN 12" = 7822.67'INV IN 4" = 7823.27' (No pipe-cutout only)INV OUT 18" = 7822.23'3B 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7822.16'INV OUT 18" = 7821.87'2B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7821.86'INV OUT 18" = 7821.55'30B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7825.92'INV IN 18" = 7820.67'INV OUT 18" = 7820.47'J-SFDB#1-3' x 3' INLETRIM = 7820.93'INV OUT 24" = 7816.59'ORIFICE EL = 7816.98'J-6A1-4 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7821.45'INV IN 24"(S) = 7814.70'INV IN 24"(N) = 7814.52'INV OUT 24" = 7814.35'I-6A 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.80'INV IN 18" = 7813.99'INV IN 24" = 7814.95'INV OUT 24" = 7814.78'ORIFICE EL = 7718.02'J6A2 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7819.30'INV IN 24" = 7815.27'INV OUT 24" = 7814.98'J6A3 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7820.02'INV IN 10" = 7815.61'INV OUT 12" = 7815.48'I6B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.92'INV IN 12" = 7816.08'INV OUT 18" = 7815.91'TEMP 12" INLETRIM = 7818.93'INV OUT 10" = 7816.84'J-EX1 STORM MH (5' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7819.80'INV IN 24"(W) = 7813.80'INV IN 18"(S)(EX) = 7814.31'INV OUT 24" = 7813.30'131.2 LF-12" HDPE12" Stub outBuried at time of survey2.43%8.47 LF-12" HDPE25.8%27.4 LF-15" RCP1.24%25.9 LF-15" RCP1.73%39.4 LF-15" RCP2.73%93.0 LF-18" RCP2.94%27.1 LF-18" RCP4.28%47.4 LF-18" RCP6.19%38.1 LF-18" RCP0.15%25.9 LF-12" HDPE8.89%68.9 LF-12" HDPE2.63%21.0 LF-18" RCP1.71%15.0 LF18" RCP2.13%36.2 LF-18" RCP2.43%106.4 LF-18" RCP5.16%115.1 LF-24" HDPE1.64%10.6 LF24" RCP2.45%10.7 LF24" RCP0.28%20.0 LF18" RCP1.05%13.2 LF12" RCP2.26%81.9 LF-10" HDPE0.93%4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7821.09'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7820.65'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.53'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.56'48 LF-24" RCP1.15%15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7806.56'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.22'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.45'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7812.24'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7805.96'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7806.24'INV OUT CPELEV = 7806.18'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.20'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.07'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.13'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.06'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7816.97'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.30'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7818.00'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.95'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7819.05'15 IN INV CPELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.67'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.32'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.12'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7825.66'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7829.96'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7831.76'SUMP ELEV = 7815.27' 12" CPPELEV = 7816.88'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7815.88'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.41'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.10'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.62'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7828.51'WVDWCTEEEWVSDYHDYHWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVEEEESSSDgasWVWVWVSSSWVWVHYDWVWVEEHYDHYD WVWVWVWVWVWVCCTTWVWVWVWIV WVWVIV IV IVIVIVGVgasgasgasTCTCTCDCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT10.5' WIDE STORM SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 3 AND 45.0' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OFBURLINGAME RANCH II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC.DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OFASPEN3.5' UTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3TRANSIT EASEMENTCENTERLINE 4' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 124' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENT24' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3SNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTLOT 2LOT 1LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5CONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENTBURLINGAME RANCH 1 CONDOMINIUMCONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENT187,412 Sq Ft4.302 Ac.37,502 Sq Ft0.861 Ac.LOT 34,542 Sq Ft0.104 Ac.LOT 44,486 Sq Ft0.103 Ac.HARMONY ROAD194,015 Sq Ft4.454 Ac.L23b2.11'6.11'S36°52'14"W 112.09'S17°50'24"E51.80'N78°19'26"E 94.46'S78°19'26"W 94.46'N17°50'24"W51.80'N36°52'14"E 112.09'LR2LR3188.85'209.33'CR10CR11CR12CR13CR14CR15CR16CR17CR14bCR14cCR14aCT1CT1aCT1bCT1cN34°25'37"E 204.32'N00°13'53"E 231.68'N22°29'54"W 398.18'S84°27'15"W 92.93'S33°44'31"W 135.08'L26S16°53'41"W 112.15'L18L19L21L23aL20L22L24L25L27C5C6C7C8S08°15'49"E 85.05'N72°16'44"W 73.19'S05°47'34"E 85.45'37.08'57.38'LT6LT7LT8LT9PARK CTRACT 1TRACT 3TRACT 3TRACT 1PARK CLOT 3LOT 4HARMONY ROADFORGE ROADMINING STOCK PARKWAYPAEPCKE DRIVEP12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P12-12P12-13P12-14P12-15P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P11-01P11-04P11-05P11-07P11-08P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-05P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P11-07P11-08+ 29.50+ 29.1129.13 ++ TW 28+/- BW 24.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.030354040.50 + +29.42+ TW 34+ TW 33+ TW 32FF2=7838.90FF1=7828.00FF2=7843.00FF1=7832.10FF1=7843.00FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7832.40FF1=7821.50FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7842.23FF1= 7831.33FF2=7843.40FF1= 7832.50FF2=7841.57FF1= 7830.67P12P14P11C12A13E11E15B13B14P13C12(attach)F14(b)F14(a)MATCH EXBS 100.00TS 100.00MH 100.00CB 100.00HPS 100.00BC 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00TW 100.00FFE 100.00100.00LP 100.00RIM 7836.89RIM 7836.89RIM 7837.40RIM 7837.27RIM 7832.9940.0039.6639.30TW 39.0039.3039.3028.75LP 38.50LP 38.75LP 36.75LP 36.75TW 34.5028.6028.4047.0038.00TW 42.50TW 48.00TW 49.00BW 45.00BW 38.00LP 36.7529.00TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 38.00BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 34.00TW 34.00BW 32.00TW 32.00BW 29.00TW 50.00TW 50.0049.0048.00BW 46.50BW 47.50LP36.3037.8038.805%3.7%3.4%5.0%5.0%5.0%2%4.0%28.10BW 29.00TW 40.002.5%2.0%28.1228.1028.00EOA 27.74EOA 27.353.8%2.7%27.00BW 23.00TW 26.00TW 26.001.4%37.00BW 44.00TW 43.00BW 38.0018%39.502%2%BW 38.00TW 44.00TW 46.00BW 42.50TW 60.00BW 54.00TW 51.00BW 43.00TW 49.00BW 40.0044.00BW 54.00TW 60.00TW 48.0043.00BW 39.00TW 49.00BW 41.00BW 53.00TW 57.00TW 43.00BW 37.00TW 46.00BW 44.00BW 34.00TW 41.00TW 32.00BW 29.00BW 46.00TW 48.00BW 47.00TW 43.33TW 45.0040.00BW 35.00TW 39.0034.0022.251.5%1.6%21.672.9%2.0%22.003.5%21.97TOC 22.635.0%TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.6321.5021.501.0%BW 22.004.8%EOC 22.4822.6721.5827.502.5%22.6722.67EOC 22.48EOC 22.4822.103.5%22.053.5%39.2226.5026.00EOC 28.305.0%27.00TW 37.00BW 35.00TW 35.00BW 33.0027.453.5%2.0%7832783178307829TOC 22.6736.0035.0033.0032.0031.0030.0029.00EOC 28.00EOA 26.4028.0028.0027.0028.0028.0028.00TW 38.75TW 37.00TW 32.50TW 33.50TW 35.50TW 34.50TW 37.75TW 36.50TW 38.5037.0038.0039.003.33%16%EOC 22.4222.49782678277828TOC 32.50EOC 32.34 31.942%TOC 32.50TOC 31.29EOC 32.344.0% 31.59EOC 31.1330.6021.00TW 22.55BW 21.00TW 22.00BW 20.69TW 22.65BW 21.10TBC 20.85TBC 20.55TBC 21.0578347833LP 29.2541.50TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.25TOC 41.67EOC 41.44TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.2541.25TOC 30.6729.80EOC 30.4931.50TOC 30.67 31.84 31.342.70%3.70%TOC 42.96TOC 42.96DECK 42.96EOC 42.76TW 40.00BW 35.00TW 40.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 32.00TOC 32.004.3%30.6231.25TOC 42.33TOC 42.33EOC 42.173.4%42.0041.102.0%FL 20.00FL 21.00EOC 30.54EOC 30.54TOC 30.671.5%27.0029.0029.0030.0030.0030.2030.203.2%30.203.3% 33.00EOC 31.823.3%31.14EOC 42.82EOC 42.82EOC 42.8242.612.2%42.312.0%42.204.2%35.0029.0030.00TOC 32.0078307829BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 32.00BW 31.00BW 30.00TW 35.50TW 35.00LP 40.50TOC 44.00TOC 44.00EOC 43.75EOC 43.75TOC 32.96EOC 32.80TOC 32.96EOC 32.80EOC 31.8242.9643.004.5%2.5%32.0042.502.0%31.5632.6132.6332.301.5%2.0%4.8%30.502.0%26.0031.0024.614.4%EOC 42.853.5%2.0%3.0%EOA24.13TW 28.00EOA 22.2021.60EOA 20.95TOC 22.63EOC 22.42EOC 22.4222.30EOC 22.42EOA42.32BW40.50EOA39.90EOA39.66EOA38.00EOA34.224.0%4.0%EOA24.774.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%27.5028.9327.502.5%2.0%27.9032.904.8%4.5%4.8%41.2743.5043.142.0%2.0%43.50EOC 43.07EOC 19.30EOA 27.40EOC 20.40EOC 20.7025.002.7%3.5%27.282.0%2.0%2.0%27.4025.003.6%3.5%4.0%TOC 29.00EOC 28.872.0%TOC 27.96EOC 27.80TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.3327.3328.25TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0042.61EOC 40.8144.502.6%2.0%2.6%32.202.0%31.6241.62TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.33TOC 34.00EOC 33.84TOC 32.962.0%33.0032.10TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0033.0032.413.2%41.12TW 38.12BW 36.12TW41.50BW 38.50TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90BW 31.00TW 33.12TW 35.62TW 38.12BW 36.12TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90EOA 41.72EOA 41.16EOA 41.16BW 38.50TW41.50TW41.00EOA 41.72TW41.00BW 34.00TW42.00BW38.00TW42.00TW38.00BW34.002.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%TW31.00BW 28.00LP 29.75EOC 27.9031.5027.502.3%27.502.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 31.00EOC 30.862.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.002.0%2.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.0027.503.7%2.3%44.702.0%1.5%TOC 34.00EOC 33.8430.5231.5033.4430.5030.5033.69TOC 45.0032.2033.5433.0044.0043.0043.0042.9042.4043.2143.0341.7541.29TOC 42.29EOC 42.1241.5840.40EOC 40.2639.7640.6441.50EOC 44.8044.255.0%43.75TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00TOC 33.00EOC 32.782.5%TOC 45.00EOC 44.8044.105.0%3.5%2.0%2.6%1.9%TOC 42.29EOC 42.0730.67TOC 30.33TOC30.33TOC 30.33EOC 30.1330.0030.5530.002.0%3.0%3.0%EOC 30.132.5%TOC 30.29EOC 30.10TOC 41.33EOC 41.16TOC 41.33EOC 41.1640.505.0%30.5029.504.3%5.0%TOC 41.33EOC 41.13TOC 41.33EOC 41.1340.7740.685.0%5.0%1.5%29.773.5%3.0%29.505.0%4.5%TBC 40.50TBC 41.60TOC 31.33TOC 31.33EOC 31.16EOC 31.1641.6241.1229.5028.5028.0027.5030.832.1%30.832.1%2.6%2.0%4.3%30.3327.502.5%3.2%2.3%2.5%2.7%2.5%2.0%2.0%2.0%7828EOC 28.06EOC 27.96BW 35.50 32.88 LP 31.50TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.0029.00EOC 28.822%2%2%EOC 28.84TOC 29.0037.00TOC 39.82EOC 39.82EOC 39.882%EOC 39.73TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00EOC 28.83EOC 28.83EOC 28.83TOC 29.002%2%2%EOC 39.73EOC 39.7339.403.0%3.0%BW 35.003.0%EOC 31.82EOC 31.892.0%EOC 31.65783178302.0%31.502.0%EOC 42.9242.5041.17EOC 40.71EOC 42.9842.52EOC 40.3239.701.0%2.0%2.8%2.8%TOC 31.3330.501.0%TOW 41.50BOW 37.50TOW 36.50BOW 33.00BOW 32.00TOW 36.502.9%3.7%32.602.4%2.4%32.6032.40TOC 33.003.3%TW 44.00BW 42.00TW 41.50BW 39.50TW 39.00BW 37.00TW 36.50BW 34.50TW 34.00BW 33.00EOC 30.86EOC 30.8630.73TOC 31.00TOC 31.00TOC 31.00EOC 30.7930.393.0%5.0%EOC 30.79EOC 30.794.4%4.1%TOC 31.0029.8030.3830.382.8%5.0%28.403.0%FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00RG 27BRG 2BRG 3BRG 4BRG 12BRG 11BRG 6BRG 10BRG 9BRG 21BRG 28BRG 17BRG 22BRG 23BRG 24BRG 16BRG 14B.1RG 14BRG 31B1RG 20BRG 1BRG27B1P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P11-01911-02P11-03P11-04P11-05P11-06P11-07P11-08P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P14-8P14-7P14-6P14-5P14-4P14-3P14-2P14-1P14-941224912105448615VANACCESSIBLEVANACCESSIBLESSSSSSSSSSDDSSSTPCDSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEWVWVWVWVWVCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOWVEEEWVEEEEX. COAEL. VAULTFLOW LINEOF 1' SWALEASPHALT PARKING EXISTING BUS PULL OUTWATER FOUNTAINAND METER12" IRRIGATION RE-USE LINE AS-BUILTS PROVIDEDBY MCLAUGHLIN RINCONHC APPROX LOCATION 6" PVC PIPE(45° VERTICAL BENDAT PUMP IN MANHOLE)24" RCP18" RCP 18" RCP12" RCP18" RCP18" R CP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP 8" CPP 8" CPP24" RCP6" PVC24" RCPINV=7808.40'STORM MANHOLERIM=7818.36' 24" RCP INV IN=7810.56'6" PVC INV OUT =7813.17'24" RCP INV OUT =7810.71'8" CMP INVOUT=7809.89'IRRIGATION INLET BOX12" INV OUT=7804.42'STMH RIM = 7811.17'INV. IN 12"=7805.57'INV. 12"(CAPPED)=7806.32'INV. 6" PVC=PUMP @ FLANGE=7807.02'BOTTOM OF MH=7801.48'18 LF 24"STORM LINE12 LF OF 8"STORM PIPE8" INV IN7815.61'STMH RIM =7819.80'24" RCP N. INV. IN=7813.90'18" RCP S. INV. IN=7814.30'24" RCP E. INV. OUT=7813.72'12" PVC PIPE 12' PVC PIPE (CAPPED AT MANHOLE)1.5' DIA INLET RIM=7816.60'8" CPP N. INV.=7812.60'8" CPP S.E INV.=7812.60'4" PVC W. INV.=7812.60'2X2 INLET RIM=7807.65'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7806.15'18"RCP S.E. INV.=7806.25'2X3 INLET RIM=7807.85'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7805.95'18"RCP N.E. INV.=7805.00'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.0'18"RCP W. INV. OUT=7816.95'15"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.95'INV OUT=7809.3'INV=7809.1INV=7806.5INV=7817.40'INV 18" RCP=7817.222X2 INLET RIM=7819.40'24"RCP S. INV.OUT=7816.85'15"RCP E. INV. IN=7816.85'18"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.85'INV 12" CPP=7817.49'INV OUT=7817.11'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.45'18"RCP S. INV.=7817.80'18" RCPINV OUT 6" CPP=7818.22INV 6" CPP=7816.61INV=7816.33INV=7815.6712" CPPINV=7805.651.5' DIA INLET RIM=7808.20'8" CPP N.W. INV.=7806.40'8" CPP S.E INV.=7806.40'INV IN=7812.1'STORM INLET RIM=7822.08'18" RCP S. INV. IN=16.08'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=15.88'8" CPPINV. IN=7818.33'4" PVC ROOF DRAININV. IN=7819.31'19" DIA RIM=7818.10'8" CPP INV. OUT=15.15'19" DIA RIM=7817.53'8" CPP INV. OUT=13.94'19" DIA INLET RIM=7817.00'8" CPP N. INV. IN=13.27''8" CPP S. INV. OUT0=13.27'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.62'INV. OUT=17.65'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.61'INV. OUT=17.67'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.63'INV. OUT=17.65'8" CPPINV. IN=17.86'8" CPPINV. OUT=17.69'STORM INLET RIM=7845.50'18" RCP S. INV. IN=41.05'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=41.00'STORM INLET RIM=7832.75'18" RCP S. INV. IN=28.05'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=27.95'STAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.62'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.57'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7818.97'AS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINESE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERSE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERAS-BUILTPROPOSED SECONDARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.89'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7818.09'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.48'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.40'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.52'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBELEV. = 7816.65'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #75RIM = 7820.96'INV. IN = 7809.94'INV. OUT = 7809.74'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #76RIM = 7825.21'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. OUT = 7814.94'SE AS-BUILT SMH #77RIM = 7827.43'INV. OUT = 7816.75'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7814.64'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7817.69'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7813.84'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7816.34' AS-BUILT SEWER SERVICEELEV = 7818.17'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7821.18'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7823.43'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.05'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.31'AS-BUILTSEWER SERVICE CAPT.P.ELEV. = 7826.16'9B 18" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.83'INV OUT 18" = 7835.83'8B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7837.27'INV IN 12" = 7832.64'INV OUT 15" = 7832.30'6B 1 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV OUT 15" = 7832.21'12B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV IN 15" (W) = 7831.59'INV IN 15" (N)= 7831.27'INV OUT 18" = 7831.10'10B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7839.38'INV OUT 18" = 7835.86'11B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7837.40'INV IN 15" = 7831.96'INV OUT 15" = 7831.72'13B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7832.99'INV IN 18" = 7828.37'INV OUT 18" = 7827.78'15B1 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7832.30'INV IN 12" = 7826.79INV IN 18" = 7826.62'INV OUT 18" = 7826.52'5B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7828.38'INV IN 18" = 7823.59'INV IN 4" = 7823.63'INV OUT 18" = 7823.45'4B1 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7831.90'INV OUT 12" = 7826.81'4B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7829.87'INV IN 12" = 7825.00'INV OUT 12" = 7824.97'1B2 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7828.03'INV IN 18" = 7822.89'INV IN 12" = 7822.67'INV IN 4" = 7823.27' (No pipe-cutout only)INV OUT 18" = 7822.23'3B 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7822.16'INV OUT 18" = 7821.87'2B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7821.86'INV OUT 18" = 7821.55'30B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7825.92'INV IN 18" = 7820.67'INV OUT 18" = 7820.47'J-SFDB#1-3' x 3' INLETRIM = 7820.93'INV OUT 24" = 7816.59'ORIFICE EL = 7816.98'J-6A1-4 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7821.45'INV IN 24"(S) = 7814.70'INV IN 24"(N) = 7814.52'INV OUT 24" = 7814.35'I-6A 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.80'INV IN 18" = 7813.99'INV IN 24" = 7814.95'INV OUT 24" = 7814.78'ORIFICE EL = 7718.02'J6A2 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7819.30'INV IN 24" = 7815.27'INV OUT 24" = 7814.98'J6A3 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7820.02'INV IN 10" = 7815.61'INV OUT 12" = 7815.48'I6B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.92'INV IN 12" = 7816.08'INV OUT 18" = 7815.91'TEMP 12" INLETRIM = 7818.93'INV OUT 10" = 7816.84'J-EX1 STORM MH (5' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7819.80'INV IN 24"(W) = 7813.80'INV IN 18"(S)(EX) = 7814.31'INV OUT 24" = 7813.30'131.2 LF-12" HDPE12" Stub outBuried at time of survey2.43%8.47 LF-12" HDPE25.8%27.4 LF-15" RCP1.24%25.9 LF-15" RCP1.73%39.4 LF-15" RCP2.73%93.0 LF-18" RCP2.94%27.1 LF-18" RCP4.28%47.4 LF-18" RCP6.19%38.1 LF-18" RCP0.15%25.9 LF-12" HDPE8.89%68.9 LF-12" HDPE2.63%21.0 LF-18" RCP1.71%15.0 LF18" RCP2.13%36.2 LF-18" RCP2.43%106.4 LF-18" RCP5.16%115.1 LF-24" HDPE1.64%10.6 LF24" RCP2.45%10.7 LF24" RCP0.28%20.0 LF18" RCP1.05%13.2 LF12" RCP2.26%81.9 LF-10" HDPE0.93%4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7821.09'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7820.65'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.53'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.56'48 LF-24" RCP1.15%15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7806.56'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.22'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.45'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7812.24'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7805.96'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7806.24'INV OUT CPELEV = 7806.18'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.20'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.07'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.13'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.06'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7816.97'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.30'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7818.00'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.95'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7819.05'15 IN INV CPELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.67'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.32'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.12'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7825.66'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7829.96'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7831.76'SUMP ELEV = 7815.27' 12" CPPELEV = 7816.88'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7815.88'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.41'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.10'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.62'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7828.51'WVDWCTEEEWVSDYHDYHWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVEEEESSSDgasWVWVWVSSSWVWVHYDWVWVEEHYDHYD WVWVWVWVWVWVCCTTWVWVWVWIV WVWVIV IV IVIVIVGVgasgasgasTCTCTCDCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT10.5' WIDE STORM SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 3 AND 45.0' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OFBURLINGAME RANCH II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC.DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OFASPEN3.5' UTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3TRANSIT EASEMENTCENTERLINE 4' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 124' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENT24' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3SNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTLOT 2LOT 1LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5CONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENTBURLINGAME RANCH 1 CONDOMINIUMCONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENT187,412 Sq Ft4.302 Ac.37,502 Sq Ft0.861 Ac.LOT 34,542 Sq Ft0.104 Ac.LOT 44,486 Sq Ft0.103 Ac.HARMONY ROAD194,015 Sq Ft4.454 Ac.L23b2.11'6.11'S36°52'14"W 112.09'S17°50'24"E51.80'N78°19'26"E 94.46'S78°19'26"W 94.46'N17°50'24"W51.80'N36°52'14"E 112.09'LR2LR3188.85'209.33'CR10CR11CR12CR13CR14CR15CR16CR17CR14bCR14cCR14aCT1CT1aCT1bCT1cN34°25'37"E 204.32'N00°13'53"E 231.68'N22°29'54"W 398.18'S84°27'15"W 92.93'S33°44'31"W 135.08'L26S16°53'41"W 112.15'L18L19L21L23aL20L22L24L25L27C5C6C7C8S08°15'49"E 85.05'N72°16'44"W 73.19'S05°47'34"E 85.45'37.08'57.38'LT6LT7LT8LT9PARK CTRACT 1TRACT 3TRACT 3TRACT 1PARK CLOT 3LOT 4HARMONY ROADFORGE ROADMINING STOCK PARKWAYPAEPCKE DRIVEP12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P12-12P12-13P12-14P12-15P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P11-01P11-04P11-05P11-07P11-08P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-05P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P11-07P11-08+ 29.50+ 29.1129.13 ++ TW 28+/- BW 24.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.030354040.50 + +29.42+ TW 34+ TW 33+ TW 32FF2=7838.90FF1=7828.00FF2=7843.00FF1=7832.10FF1=7843.00FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7832.40FF1=7821.50FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7842.23FF1= 7831.33FF2=7843.40FF1= 7832.50FF2=7841.57FF1= 7830.67P12P14P11C12A13E11E15B13B14P13C12(attach)F14(b)F14(a)MATCH EXBS 100.00TS 100.00MH 100.00CB 100.00HPS 100.00BC 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00TW 100.00FFE 100.00100.00LP 100.00RIM 7836.89RIM 7836.89RIM 7837.40RIM 7837.27RIM 7832.9940.0039.6639.30TW 39.0039.3039.3028.75LP 38.50LP 38.75LP 36.75LP 36.75TW 34.5028.6028.4047.0038.00TW 42.50TW 48.00TW 49.00BW 45.00BW 38.00LP 36.7529.00TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 38.00BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 34.00TW 34.00BW 32.00TW 32.00BW 29.00TW 50.00TW 50.0049.0048.00BW 46.50BW 47.50LP36.3037.8038.805%3.7%3.4%5.0%5.0%5.0%2%4.0%28.10BW 29.00TW 40.002.5%2.0%28.1228.1028.00EOA 27.74EOA 27.353.8%2.7%27.00BW 23.00TW 26.00TW 26.001.4%37.00BW 44.00TW 43.00BW 38.0018%39.502%2%BW 38.00TW 44.00TW 46.00BW 42.50TW 60.00BW 54.00TW 51.00BW 43.00TW 49.00BW 40.0044.00BW 54.00TW 60.00TW 48.0043.00BW 39.00TW 49.00BW 41.00BW 53.00TW 57.00TW 43.00BW 37.00TW 46.00BW 44.00BW 34.00TW 41.00TW 32.00BW 29.00BW 46.00TW 48.00BW 47.00TW 43.33TW 45.0040.00BW 35.00TW 39.0034.0022.251.5%1.6%21.672.9%2.0%22.003.5%21.97TOC 22.635.0%TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.6321.5021.501.0%BW 22.004.8%EOC 22.4822.6721.5827.502.5%22.6722.67EOC 22.48EOC 22.4822.103.5%22.053.5%39.2226.5026.00EOC 28.305.0%27.00TW 37.00BW 35.00TW 35.00BW 33.0027.453.5%2.0%7832783178307829TOC 22.6736.0035.0033.0032.0031.0030.0029.00EOC 28.00EOA 26.4028.0028.0027.0028.0028.0028.00TW 38.75TW 37.00TW 32.50TW 33.50TW 35.50TW 34.50TW 37.75TW 36.50TW 38.5037.0038.0039.003.33%16%EOC 22.4222.49782678277828TOC 32.50EOC 32.34 31.942%TOC 32.50TOC 31.29EOC 32.344.0% 31.59EOC 31.1330.6021.00TW 22.55BW 21.00TW 22.00BW 20.69TW 22.65BW 21.10TBC 20.85TBC 20.55TBC 21.0578347833LP 29.2541.50TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.25TOC 41.67EOC 41.44TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.2541.25TOC 30.6729.80EOC 30.4931.50TOC 30.67 31.84 31.342.70%3.70%TOC 42.96TOC 42.96DECK 42.96EOC 42.76TW 40.00BW 35.00TW 40.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 32.00TOC 32.004.3%30.6231.25TOC 42.33TOC 42.33EOC 42.173.4%42.0041.102.0%FL 20.00FL 21.00EOC 30.54EOC 30.54TOC 30.671.5%27.0029.0029.0030.0030.0030.2030.203.2%30.203.3% 33.00EOC 31.823.3%31.14EOC 42.82EOC 42.82EOC 42.8242.612.2%42.312.0%42.204.2%35.0029.0030.00TOC 32.0078307829BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 32.00BW 31.00BW 30.00TW 35.50TW 35.00LP 40.50TOC 44.00TOC 44.00EOC 43.75EOC 43.75TOC 32.96EOC 32.80TOC 32.96EOC 32.80EOC 31.8242.9643.004.5%2.5%32.0042.502.0%31.5632.6132.6332.301.5%2.0%4.8%30.502.0%26.0031.0024.614.4%EOC 42.853.5%2.0%3.0%EOA24.13TW 28.00EOA 22.2021.60EOA 20.95TOC 22.63EOC 22.42EOC 22.4222.30EOC 22.42EOA42.32BW40.50EOA39.90EOA39.66EOA38.00EOA34.224.0%4.0%EOA24.774.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%27.5028.9327.502.5%2.0%27.9032.904.8%4.5%4.8%41.2743.5043.142.0%2.0%43.50EOC 43.07EOC 19.30EOA 27.40EOC 20.40EOC 20.7025.002.7%3.5%27.282.0%2.0%2.0%27.4025.003.6%3.5%4.0%TOC 29.00EOC 28.872.0%TOC 27.96EOC 27.80TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.3327.3328.25TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0042.61EOC 40.8144.502.6%2.0%2.6%32.202.0%31.6241.62TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.33TOC 34.00EOC 33.84TOC 32.962.0%33.0032.10TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0033.0032.413.2%41.12TW 38.12BW 36.12TW41.50BW 38.50TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90BW 31.00TW 33.12TW 35.62TW 38.12BW 36.12TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90EOA 41.72EOA 41.16EOA 41.16BW 38.50TW41.50TW41.00EOA 41.72TW41.00BW 34.00TW42.00BW38.00TW42.00TW38.00BW34.002.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%TW31.00BW 28.00LP 29.75EOC 27.9031.5027.502.3%27.502.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 31.00EOC 30.862.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.002.0%2.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.0027.503.7%2.3%44.702.0%1.5%TOC 34.00EOC 33.8430.5231.5033.4430.5030.5033.69TOC 45.0032.2033.5433.0044.0043.0043.0042.9042.4043.2143.0341.7541.29TOC 42.29EOC 42.1241.5840.40EOC 40.2639.7640.6441.50EOC 44.8044.255.0%43.75TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00TOC 33.00EOC 32.782.5%TOC 45.00EOC 44.8044.105.0%3.5%2.0%2.6%1.9%TOC 42.29EOC 42.0730.67TOC 30.33TOC30.33TOC 30.33EOC 30.1330.0030.5530.002.0%3.0%3.0%EOC 30.132.5%TOC 30.29EOC 30.10TOC 41.33EOC 41.16TOC 41.33EOC 41.1640.505.0%30.5029.504.3%5.0%TOC 41.33EOC 41.13TOC 41.33EOC 41.1340.7740.685.0%5.0%1.5%29.773.5%3.0%29.505.0%4.5%TBC 40.50TBC 41.60TOC 31.33TOC 31.33EOC 31.16EOC 31.1641.6241.1229.5028.5028.0027.5030.832.1%30.832.1%2.6%2.0%4.3%30.3327.502.5%3.2%2.3%2.5%2.7%2.5%2.0%2.0%2.0%7828EOC 28.06EOC 27.96BW 35.50 32.88 LP 31.50TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.0029.00EOC 28.822%2%2%EOC 28.84TOC 29.0037.00TOC 39.82EOC 39.82EOC 39.882%EOC 39.73TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00EOC 28.83EOC 28.83EOC 28.83TOC 29.002%2%2%EOC 39.73EOC 39.7339.403.0%3.0%BW 35.003.0%EOC 31.82EOC 31.892.0%EOC 31.65783178302.0%31.502.0%EOC 42.9242.5041.17EOC 40.71EOC 42.9842.52EOC 40.3239.701.0%2.0%2.8%2.8%TOC 31.3330.501.0%TOW 41.50BOW 37.50TOW 36.50BOW 33.00BOW 32.00TOW 36.502.9%3.7%32.602.4%2.4%32.6032.40TOC 33.003.3%TW 44.00BW 42.00TW 41.50BW 39.50TW 39.00BW 37.00TW 36.50BW 34.50TW 34.00BW 33.00EOC 30.86EOC 30.8630.73TOC 31.00TOC 31.00TOC 31.00EOC 30.7930.393.0%5.0%EOC 30.79EOC 30.794.4%4.1%TOC 31.0029.8030.3830.382.8%5.0%28.403.0%FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00RG 27BRG 2BRG 3BRG 4BRG 12BRG 11BRG 6BRG 10BRG 9BRG 21BRG 28BRG 17BRG 22BRG 23BRG 24BRG 16BRG 14B.1RG 14BRG 31B1RG 20BRG 1BRG27B1P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P11-01911-02P11-03P11-04P11-05P11-06P11-07P11-08P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P14-8P14-7P14-6P14-5P14-4P14-3P14-2P14-1P14-941224912105448615VANACCESSIBLEVANACCESSIBLESSSS SSSSSSDDSSSTPCDSEEEEEEEEE EEE E EE E EWVWVWVWV WVCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOWVEEEWVEEEEX. COAEL. VAULTFLOW LINEOF 1' SWALE ASPHALT PARKING EXISTING BUS PULL OUTWATER FOUNTAINAND METER12" IRRIGATION RE-USE LINE AS-BUILTS PROVIDEDBY MCLAUGHLIN RINCONHC APPROX LOCATION 6" PVC PIPE(45° VERTICAL BENDAT PUMP IN MANHOLE)24" R CP 1 8" RC P 18" RCP12" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP 8" CPP 8" CPP24" RCP6" PVC24" RCPINV=7808.40'STORM MANHOLERIM=7818.36' 24" RCP INV IN=7810.56'6" PVC INV OUT =7813.17'24" RCP INV OUT =7810.71'8" CMP INVOUT=7809.89'IRRIGATION INLET BOX12" INV OUT=7804.42'STMH RIM = 7811.17'INV. IN 12"=7805.57'INV. 12"(CAPPED)=7806.32'INV. 6" PVC=PUMP @ FLANGE=7807.02'BOTTOM OF MH=7801.48'18 LF 24"STORM LINE12 LF OF 8"STORM PIPE8" INV IN7815.61'STMH RIM =7819.80'24" RCP N. INV. IN=7813.90'18" RCP S. INV. IN=7814.30'24" RCP E. INV. OUT=7813.72'12" PVC PIPE 12' PVC PIPE (CAPPED AT MANHOLE)1.5' DIA INLET RIM=7816.60'8" CPP N. INV.=7812.60'8" CPP S.E INV.=7812.60'4" PVC W. INV.=7812.60'2X2 INLET RIM=7807.65'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7806.15'18"RCP S.E. INV.=7806.25'2X3 INLET RIM=7807.85'18"RCP N.W. INV.=7805.95'18"RCP N.E. INV.=7805.00'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.0'18"RCP W. INV. OUT=7816.95'15"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.95'INV OUT=7809.3'INV=7809.1INV=7806.5INV=7817.40'INV 18" RCP=7817.222X2 INLET RIM=7819.40'24"RCP S. INV.OUT=7816.85'15"RCP E. INV. IN=7816.85'18"RCP N. INV. IN=7816.85'INV 12" CPP=7817.49'INV OUT=7817.11'2X2 INLET RIM=7819.45'18"RCP S. INV.=7817.80'18" RCPINV OUT 6" CPP=7818.22 INV 6" CPP=7816.61INV=7816.33INV=7815.6712" CPP INV=7805.651.5' DIA INLET RIM=7808.20'8" CPP N.W. INV.=7806.40'8" CPP S.E INV.=7806.40'INV IN=7812.1'STORM INLET RIM=7822.08'18" RCP S. INV. IN=16.08'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=15.88'8" CPPINV. IN=7818.33'4" PVC ROOF DRAININV. IN=7819.31'19" DIA RIM=7818.10'8" CPP INV. OUT=15.15'19" DIA RIM=7817.53'8" CPP INV. OUT=13.94'19" DIA INLET RIM=7817.00'8" CPP N. INV. IN=13.27''8" CPP S. INV. OUT0=13.27'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.62'INV. OUT=17.65'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.61'INV. OUT=17.67'1'x1' DRAIN RIM=7818.63'INV. OUT=17.65'8" CPPINV. IN=17.86'8" CPPINV. OUT=17.69'STORM INLET RIM=7845.50'18" RCP S. INV. IN=41.05'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=41.00'STORM INLET RIM=7832.75'18" RCP S. INV. IN=28.05'18" RCP N. INV. OUT=27.95'STAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHAS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.62'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7819.57'AS-BUILTJOINT TRENCHTOP PIPE=7818.97'AS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINEAS-BUILTHCE LINESE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERSE AS-BUILT HCETRANSFORMERAS-BUILTPROPOSED SECONDARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.89'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7818.09'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.48'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.40'AS-BUILTPRIMARY ELECTRICTOP PIPE=7817.52'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBELEV. = 7816.65'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #75RIM = 7820.96'INV. IN = 7809.94'INV. OUT = 7809.74'SE &AS-BUILT SMH #76RIM = 7825.21'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. IN = 7815.14'INV. OUT = 7814.94'SE AS-BUILT SMH #77RIM = 7827.43'INV. OUT = 7816.75'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7814.64'AS-BUILTSEWER STUBT.P.ELEV. = 7817.69'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7813.84'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7816.34' AS-BUILT SEWER SERVICEELEV = 7818.17'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7821.18'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7823.43'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.05'AS-BUILTSEWER BENDT.P.ELEV. = 7824.31'AS-BUILTSEWER SERVICE CAPT.P.ELEV. = 7826.16'9B 18" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.83'INV OUT 18" = 7835.83'8B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7837.27'INV IN 12" = 7832.64'INV OUT 15" = 7832.30'6B 1 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV OUT 15" = 7832.21'12B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7836.89'INV IN 15" (W) = 7831.59'INV IN 15" (N)= 7831.27'INV OUT 18" = 7831.10'10B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7839.38'INV OUT 18" = 7835.86'11B 24" AREA INLETRIM = 7837.40'INV IN 15" = 7831.96'INV OUT 15" = 7831.72'13B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7832.99'INV IN 18" = 7828.37'INV OUT 18" = 7827.78'15B1 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7832.30'INV IN 12" = 7826.79INV IN 18" = 7826.62'INV OUT 18" = 7826.52'5B 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7828.38'INV IN 18" = 7823.59'INV IN 4" = 7823.63'INV OUT 18" = 7823.45'4B1 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7831.90'INV OUT 12" = 7826.81'4B 12" PVC PIPETOP OF PIPE = 7829.87'INV IN 12" = 7825.00'INV OUT 12" = 7824.97'1B2 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7828.03'INV IN 18" = 7822.89'INV IN 12" = 7822.67'INV IN 4" = 7823.27' (No pipe-cutout only)INV OUT 18" = 7822.23'3B 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7822.16'INV OUT 18" = 7821.87'2B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7827.27'INV IN 18" = 7821.86'INV OUT 18" = 7821.55'30B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7825.92'INV IN 18" = 7820.67'INV OUT 18" = 7820.47'J-SFDB#1-3' x 3' INLETRIM = 7820.93'INV OUT 24" = 7816.59'ORIFICE EL = 7816.98'J-6A1-4 STORM MH (4' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7821.45'INV IN 24"(S) = 7814.70'INV IN 24"(N) = 7814.52'INV OUT 24" = 7814.35'I-6A 3' x 3' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.80'INV IN 18" = 7813.99'INV IN 24" = 7814.95'INV OUT 24" = 7814.78'ORIFICE EL = 7718.02'J6A2 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7819.30'INV IN 24" = 7815.27'INV OUT 24" = 7814.98'J6A3 2' x 3' CURB INLETRIM = 7820.02'INV IN 10" = 7815.61'INV OUT 12" = 7815.48'I6B 2' x 2' AREA INLETRIM = 7820.92'INV IN 12" = 7816.08'INV OUT 18" = 7815.91'TEMP 12" INLETRIM = 7818.93'INV OUT 10" = 7816.84'J-EX1 STORM MH (5' Dia. Conc.)RIM = 7819.80'INV IN 24"(W) = 7813.80'INV IN 18"(S)(EX) = 7814.31'INV OUT 24" = 7813.30'131.2 LF-12" HDPE12" Stub outBuried at time of survey2.43%8.47 LF-12" HDPE25.8%27.4 LF-15" RCP1.24%25.9 LF-15" RCP1.73%39.4 LF-15" RCP2.73%93.0 LF-18" RCP2.94%27.1 LF-18" RCP4.28%47.4 LF-18" RCP6.19%38.1 LF-18" RCP0.15%25.9 LF-12" HDPE8.89%68.9 LF-12" HDPE2.63%21.0 LF-18" RCP1.71%15.0 LF18" RCP2.13%36.2 LF-18" RCP2.43%106.4 LF-18" RCP5.16%115.1 LF-24" HDPE1.64%10.6 LF24" RCP2.45%10.7 LF24" RCP0.28%20.0 LF18" RCP1.05%13.2 LF12" RCP2.26%81.9 LF-10" HDPE0.93%4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7821.09'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7820.65'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.53'4" PVC PIPE (TOP)ELEV. = 7819.56'48 LF-24" RCP1.15%15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7806.56'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.22'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7809.45'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7812.24'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7805.96'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINV IN 15" CONCRETE PIPEELEV = 7806.24'INV OUT CPELEV = 7806.18'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.20'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.07'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.13'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.06'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7816.97'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7817.30'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7818.00'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTURESUMP ELEV = 7817.95'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7819.05'15 IN INV CPELEV = 7817.17'CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.67'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.32'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7827.12'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7825.66'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7829.96'1.2' VERT. PVC CAPINLET ELEV = 7831.76'SUMP ELEV = 7815.27' 12" CPPELEV = 7816.88'15" CONC. PIPEELEV = 7815.88'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.41'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7837.10'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7836.62'3X3 CONC. DRAINAGE STRUCTUREINLET ELEV = 7828.51'WVD WCTEEEWVSDYHDYHWVWVWVWVWVWVWVWVEEEESSSDgasWVWVWVSSSWVWVHYDWVWVEEHYDHYD WVWVWVWVWVWVCCTTWVWVWVWIV WVWVIV IV IVIVIVGVgasgasgasTCTCTCDCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE HOLY CROSS EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 20' WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT10.5' WIDE STORM SEWER EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 3 AND 45.0' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OFBURLINGAME RANCH II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC.DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OFASPEN3.5' UTILITY EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3TRANSIT EASEMENTCENTERLINE 4' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 124' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENT24' WIDE FIRE LANE EASEMENTCENTERLINE 7' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS ITAFFECTS TRACT 3SNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENTLOT 2LOT 1LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5CONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENTBURLINGAME RANCH 1 CONDOMINIUMCONDOMINIUM1ST SUPPLEMENT187,412 Sq Ft4.302 Ac.37,502 Sq Ft0.861 Ac.LOT 34,542 Sq Ft0.104 Ac.LOT 44,486 Sq Ft0.103 Ac.HARMONY ROAD194,015 Sq Ft4.454 Ac.L23b2.11'6.11'S36°52'14"W 112.09'S17°50'24"E51.80'N78°19'26"E 94.46'S78°19'26"W 94.46'N17°50'24"W51.80'N36°52'14"E 112.09'LR2LR3188.85'209.33'CR10CR11CR12CR13CR14CR15CR16CR17CR14bCR14cCR14aCT1CT1aCT1bCT1cN34°25'37"E 204.32'N00°13'53"E 231.68'N22°29'54"W 398.18'S84°27'15"W 92.93'S33°44'31"W 135.08'L26S16°53'41"W 112.15'L18L19L21L23aL20L22L24L25L27C5C6C7C8S08°15'49"E 85.05'N72°16'44"W 73.19'S05°47'34"E 85.45'37.08'57.38'LT6LT7LT8LT9PARK CTRACT 1TRACT 3TRACT 3TRACT 1PARK CLOT 3LOT 4HARMONY ROADFORGE ROADMINING STOCK PARKWAYPAEPCKE DRIVEP12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P12-06P12-07P12-08P12-09P12-10P12-11P12-12P12-13P12-14P12-15P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P14-10P14-11P14-12P14-13P14-14P14-15P14-16P14-17P11-01P11-04P11-05P11-07P11-08P11-09P11-10P11-11P11-12P11-13P11-14P13-01P13-02P13-03P13-04P13-06P13-05P13-07P13-08P13-09P13-10P13-11P13-12P12-01P12-02P12-03P12-04P12-05P14-01P14-02P14-03P14-04P14-05P14-06P14-07P14-08P14-09P11-07P11-08+ 29.50+ 29.1129.13 ++ TW 28+/- BW 24.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.0+ TW 28.5+/- BW 26.030354040.50 + +29.42+ TW 34+ TW 33+ TW 32FF2=7838.90FF1=7828.00FF2=7843.00FF1=7832.10FF1=7843.00FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7832.40FF1=7821.50FF2=7840.00FF1=7829.10FF2=7842.23FF1= 7831.33FF2=7843.40FF1= 7832.50FF2=7841.57FF1= 7830.67P12P14P11C12A13E11E15B13B14P13C12(attach)F14(b)F14(a)MATCH EXBS 100.00TS 100.00MH 100.00CB 100.00HPS 100.00BC 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00TW 100.00FFE 100.00100.00LP 100.00RIM 7836.89RIM 7836.89RIM 7837.40RIM 7837.27RIM 7832.9940.0039.6639.30TW 39.0039.3039.3028.75LP 38.50LP 38.75LP 36.75LP 36.75TW 34.5028.6028.4047.0038.00TW 42.50TW 48.00TW 49.00BW 45.00BW 38.00LP 36.7529.00TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 38.00BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 34.00TW 34.00BW 32.00TW 32.00BW 29.00TW 50.00TW 50.0049.0048.00BW 46.50BW 47.50LP36.3037.8038.805%3.7%3.4%5.0%5.0%5.0%2%4.0%28.10BW 29.00TW 40.002.5%2.0%28.1228.1028.00EOA 27.74EOA 27.353.8%2.7%27.00BW 23.00TW 26.00TW 26.001.4%37.00BW 44.00TW 43.00BW 38.0018%39.502%2%BW 38.00TW 44.00TW 46.00BW 42.50TW 60.00BW 54.00TW 51.00BW 43.00TW 49.00BW 40.0044.00BW 54.00TW 60.00TW 48.0043.00BW 39.00TW 49.00BW 41.00BW 53.00TW 57.00TW 43.00BW 37.00TW 46.00BW 44.00BW 34.00TW 41.00TW 32.00BW 29.00BW 46.00TW 48.00BW 47.00TW 43.33TW 45.0040.00BW 35.00TW 39.0034.0022.251.5%1.6%21.672.9%2.0%22.003.5%21.97TOC 22.635.0%TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.63TOC 22.6321.5021.501.0%BW 22.004.8%EOC 22.4822.6721.5827.502.5%22.6722.67EOC 22.48EOC 22.4822.103.5%22.053.5%39.2226.5026.00EOC 28.305.0%27.00TW 37.00BW 35.00TW 35.00BW 33.0027.453.5%2.0%7832783178307829TOC 22.6736.0035.0033.0032.0031.0030.0029.00EOC 28.00EOA 26.4028.0028.0027.0028.0028.0028.00TW 38.75TW 37.00TW 32.50TW 33.50TW 35.50TW 34.50TW 37.75TW 36.50TW 38.5037.0038.0039.003.33 %16%EOC 22.4222.49782678277828TOC 32.50EOC 32.34 31.942%TOC 32.50TOC 31.29EOC 32.344.0% 31.59EOC 31.1330.6021.00TW 22.55BW 21.00TW 22.00BW 20.69TW 22.65BW 21.10TBC 20.85TBC 20.55TBC 21.0578347833LP 29.2541.50TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.25TOC 41.67EOC 41.44TOC 41.67EOC 41.4441.2541.25TOC 30.6729.80EOC 30.4931.50TOC 30.67 31.84 31.342.70%3.70%TOC 42.96TOC 42.96DECK 42.96EOC 42.76TW 40.00BW 35.00TW 40.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 43.00TOC 32.00TOC 32.004.3%30.6231.25TOC 42.33TOC 42.33EOC 42.173.4%42.0041.102.0%FL 20.00FL 21.00EOC 30.54EOC 30.54TOC 30.671.5%27.0029.0029.0030.0030.0030.2030.203.2%30.203.3% 33.00EOC 31.823.3%31.14EOC 42.82EOC 42.82EOC 42.8242.612.2%42.312.0%42.204.2%35.0029.0030.00TOC 32.0078307829BW 36.00TW 36.00BW 32.00BW 31.00BW 30.00TW 35.50TW 35.00LP 40.50TOC 44.00TOC 44.00EOC 43.75EOC 43.75TOC 32.96EOC 32.80TOC 32.96EOC 32.80EOC 31.8242.9643.004.5%2.5%32.0042.502.0%31.5632.6132.6332.301.5%2.0%4.8%30.502.0%26.0031.0024.614.4%EOC 42.853.5%2.0%3.0%EOA24.13TW 28.00EOA 22.2021.60EOA 20.95TOC 22.63EOC 22.42EOC 22.4222.30EOC 22.42EOA42.32BW40.50EOA39.90EOA39.66EOA38.00EOA34.224.0%4.0%EOA24.774.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%27.5028.9327.502.5%2.0%27.9032.904.8%4.5%4.8%41.2743.5043.142.0%2.0%43.50EOC 43.07EOC 19.30EOA 27.40EOC 20.40EOC 20.7025.002.7%3.5%27.282.0%2.0%2.0%27.4025.003.6%3.5%4.0%TOC 29.00EOC 28.872.0%TOC 27.96EOC 27.80TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.3327.3328.25TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0042.61EOC 40.8144.502.6%2.0%2.6%32.202.0%31.6241.62TOC 27.96EOC 27.8027.33TOC 34.00EOC 33.84TOC 32.962.0%33.0032.10TW 42.50BW 40.50TW 40.00BW 38.00TW 37.50BW 35.50TW 35.00BW 33.0033.0032.413.2%41.12TW 38.12BW 36.12TW41.50BW 38.50TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90BW 31.00TW 33.12TW 35.62TW 38.12BW 36.12TW 35.62BW 33.62TW 33.12BW 31.90EOA 41.72EOA 41.16EOA 41.16BW 38.50TW41.50TW41.00EOA 41.72TW41.00BW 34.00TW42.00BW38.00TW42.00TW38.00BW34.002.0%2.0%TOC 29.00EOC 27.822.0%TW31.00BW 28.00LP 29.75EOC 27.9031.5027.502.3%27.502.0%2.0%2.0%TOC 31.00EOC 30.862.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.002.0%2.0%EOC 30.86TOC 31.0027.503.7%2.3%44.702.0%1.5%TOC 34.00EOC 33.8430.5231.5033.4430.5030.5033.69TOC 45.0032.2033.5433.0044.0043.0043.0042.9042.4043.2143.0341.7541.29TOC 42.29EOC 42.1241.5840.40EOC 40.2639.7640.6441.50EOC 44.8044.255.0%43.75TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 44.00EOC 43.84TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00EOC 32.80TOC 33.00TOC 33.00EOC 32.782.5%TOC 45.00EOC 44.8044.105.0%3.5%2.0%2.6%1.9%TOC 42.29EOC 42.0730.67TOC 30.33TOC30.33TOC 30.33EOC 30.1330.0030.5530.002.0%3.0%3.0%EOC 30.132.5%TOC 30.29EOC 30.10TOC 41.33EOC 41.16TOC 41.33EOC 41.1640.505.0%30.5029.504.3%5.0%TOC 41.33EOC 41.13TOC 41.33EOC 41.1340.7740.685.0%5.0%1.5%29.773.5%3.0%29.505.0%4.5%TBC 40.50TBC 41.60TOC 31.33TOC 31.33EOC 31.16EOC 31.1641.6241.1229.5028.5028.0027.5030.832.1%30.832.1%2.6%2.0%4.3%30.3327.502.5%3.2%2.3%2.5%2.7%2.5%2.0%2.0%2.0%7828EOC 28.06EOC 27.96BW 35.50 32.88 LP 31.50TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.0029.00EOC 28.822%2%2%EOC 28.84TOC 29.0037.00TOC 39.82EOC 39.82EOC 39.882%EOC 39.73TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 40.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00TOC 29.00EOC 28.83EOC 28.83EOC 28.83TOC 29.002%2%2%EOC 39.73EOC 39.7339.403.0%3.0%BW 35.003.0%EOC 31.82EOC 31.892.0%EOC 31.65783 17830 2.0%31.502.0%EOC 42.9242.5041.17EOC 40.71EOC 42.9842.52EOC 40.3239.701.0%2.0%2.8%2.8%TOC 31.3330.501.0%TOW 41.50BOW 37.50TOW 36.50BOW 33.00BOW 32.00TOW 36.502.9%3.7%32.602.4%2.4%32.6032.40TOC 33.003.3%TW 44.00BW 42.00TW 41.50BW 39.50TW 39.00BW 37.00TW 36.50BW 34.50TW 34.00BW 33.00EOC 30.86EOC 30.8630.73TOC 31.00TOC 31.00TOC 31.00EOC 30.7930.393.0%5.0%EOC 30.79EOC 30.794.4%4.1%TOC 31.0029.8030.3830.382.8%5.0%28.403.0%FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00FFE 100.00TW 100.00TC 100.00BW 100.00100.00HOUSING
VERTICAL
CIRCULATION
PARKING
(57 STALLS)
(58 NEEDED PER
PROGRAM)
54 SFVEST.
F.F.E. = 7824'
RR
RR
STG
STG STG
744 SFINFANT A
LOBBY39 SFJAN.
734 SFINFANT B
HOUSING
STAIRS
1731 SF
INFANT
PLAYGROUND
V
728 SFTODDLER B
2494 SF
PRE-K/TODDLER
PLAYGROUND
55 SFSTG 55 SFRR
-
---
120 SFLND 61 SFRR
59 SFRR
121 SF
CUST.
STG
ELEV
STG
STG
802 SFTODDLER A
55 SF
BUGGY
STG
83 SFLACT.
75 SF
BLDG.
STG
106 SFREC.83 SFVEST.
STG840 SFGROSS MOTOR
45 SFPS
CAR SEATS
CAR SEATS
-
---
PAEPCKE DRIVE
HARMONY ROADPROPOSED TRAIL
5
X05.1
SLOPE DN5%SL
O
P
E
D
N
12
%SLOPE DN12%EXISTING PHASE 3
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
LINE OF
ROOF ABOVE
MAIN
ENTRANCE
VEHICLE
ACCESS
EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
PROPOSED OFFSITE STORM
CONVEYANCE PIPEEXISTING STORM PIPE
UTILITY EASEMENT
233 SFKITCHEN
F.F.E. = 7837'
OPEN TO
BELOW
973 SFPRESCHOOL A
STG
SECONDARY PRESCHOOL
EXPLORATORY AREA
282 SF
LEARNING
RESOURCE
HOUSING
VERTICAL
CIRCULATION
HOUSING
STAIRS
STG
STG
-
---
219 SFMECH.
73 SFTELE.
ELEV.
60 SFRR
32 SFJAN.
145 SFDIR. OFFICE
205 SFCONF. ROOM
175 SF
STAFF
LOUNGE
50 SFRR
939 SFPRESCHOOL B954 SFPRESCHOOL C
94 SF
BLDG.
STG
CIRC.
RR
RR
BALC
-
---
PROPOSED TRAIL
PAEPCKE DRIVE
HARMONY ROADCIRC.
5
X05.1
EXISTING PHASE 3
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
PROPOSED OFFSITE STORM
CONVEYANCE PIPEEXISTING STORM PIPE
UTILITY EASEMENT
1001 SFUNIT 4939 SFUNIT 5
965 SFUNIT 3
765 SFUNIT 2
762 SFUNIT 1
1016 SFUNIT 6
1007 SFUNIT 7CIRC.
HOUSING
VERTICAL
CIRCULATION
BED 2
RRRR
RR
RR
RR
RR
RRRR
RR
RR
BED 2
BED 2
BED 1
BED 2
-
---
F.F.E. = 7850'
BED 2
LNDRR
BALC.
BALC.
BALC.
HOUSING
STAIRS
BALC.
CIRC.
-
---
PAEPCKE DRIVE
HARMONY ROADPROPOSED TRAIL
5
X05.1
BALC.
BED 1
BED 1
BED 1
BED 1
BED 1
BED 1
LND
LND
LND
LND
LND
EXISTING PHASE 3
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
PROPOSED OFFSITE STORM
CONVEYANCE PIPEEXISTING STORM PIPE
UTILITY EASEMENT
ELEV.
COMPACT CA
R
S
97 SF
WATER
ENTRY
110 SFELEC.
-
---
ELEV.
ECE
STAIRS
HOUSING
STAIRS
-
---
PAEPCKE DRIVE
HARMONY ROAD5
X05.1
HOUSING
VERTICAL
CIRCULATION
EXISTING PHASE 3
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE
EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
PROPOSED OFFSITE STORM
CONVEYANCE PIPEEXISTING STORM PIPE
UTILITY EASEMENT
F.F.E. = 7812'
-
9
"
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
X05.0
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
REVIEW
2022-3
8/05/2022
STREETSIDE ECE -
PLANSASPEN BURLINGAME ECECity of Aspen
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
KEY FEATURES:
ALL PLAYGROUNDS HAVE SOUTHERN
EXPOSURE
PREFERRED SOLAR ORIENTATION FOR
DAYLIGHTING & PV
SOUTH FACING ENTRY
PROVIDES 57 PARKING STALLS, PARTIALLY
HIDDEN
ALLOWS FOR SECONDARY NEIGHBORHOOD
ENTRY POINT
FRONTS THE STREET
FIRE ACCESS FOR ECE PROGRAM
IMPROVED
ON-GRADE ENTRY
SECONDARY PRESCHOOL EXPLORATORY
AREA
MEETS FIRE DEPARTMENTS FIRE ACCESS
REQUIREMENT
INCORPORATES MORE HOUSING UNITS
MORE ON-SITE AREA FOR PROPOSED TRAIL
LEAVES SOME OF PREVIOUS PHASE
IMPROVEMENTS INTACT (EX. WATER
DETENTION AREAS AND SOME PORTIONS
OF SOUTHERN GRADING)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SITE CHALLENGES:
PARKING IS STRUCTURED, PARTIALLY
BELOW GRADE
COST OF STRUCTURED PARKING
USES HOUSING LOTS 4 & 5
LIMITED AREA FOR SNOW STORAGE
HOUSING AND ECE DO NOT HAVE
SEPARATE ARCHITECTURAL IDENTITIES
1" = 30'-0"1STREETSIDE ECE - 1ST FLOOR ECE
1" = 30'-0"2STREETSIDE ECE - 2ND FLOOR ECE
ECE AREA:
13,905 GSF
1" = 30'-0"3STREETSIDE ECE - 3RD FL HOUSING
HOUSING AREA:
8,198 GSF
2 (1) BEDROOM UNITS
5 (2) BEDROOM UNITS
PARKING AREA:
STRUCTURED 14,315 SF
SURFACE - 10,373 SF
N N
NN
1" = 30'-0"0STREETSIDE ECE - PARKING LEVEL
ABBREVIATIONS:
BALC BALCONY
BLDG BUILDING
CIRC CIRCULATION
CONF CONFERENCE
CUST CUSTODIAL
DIR DIRECTOR
DN DOWN
ELEC ELECTRICAL
ELEV ELEVATOR
F.F.E FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
JAN JANITORIAL
LACT LACTATION
LND LAUNDRY
MECH MECHANICAL
OFF OFFICE
RR REST ROOM
REC RECEPTION
PS PLAY STORAGE
STG STORAGE
TELE TELECOM
VEST VESTIBULE
220
PARKING
PARKINGRAMP BEYOND
VERTICAL CIRCULATION BEYOND
SECONDARY PRESCHOOL
EXPLORATORY AREA
OPT 3 - 2ND FL (7837')16' - 0"
OPT 3 - 1ST FL (7824')3' - 0"
OPT 3 - HOUSING (7850')29' - 0"
OPT 3 - HOUSING ROOF
(7862')41' - 0"
OPT 3 - PARKING
(7812'-9")-8' - 3 1/32"
TODDLER
PRESCHOOL
BED 2
GROSS MOTOR
PRESCHOOL
BED 1
PARKING
TODDLER/PRE-K PLAYGROUND
CIRC.
CIRC.
CIRC.LND RR
3" / 1'-0"3" / 1'-0"TO MIDPOINT OF HIGHEST ROOF4' - 10 3/4"
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
X05.1
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
REVIEW
2022-3
8/05/2022
STREETSIDE ECE -
SECTIONS & 3D
VIEWSASPEN BURLINGAME ECECity of Aspen
1/8" = 1'-0"5STREETSIDE ECE - SECTION
7/26/2022 - UPDATED TOTAL SF
PLEASE NOTE:FOR REFERENCE - EXISTING PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE MASSING SHOWN WITHOUT WINDOWS 6" = 1'-0"1VIEW LOOKING SOUTH ON PAEPCKE DRIVE
6" = 1'-0"3VIEW LOOKING SOUTH WEST
6" = 1'-0"2VIEW LOOKING NORTH AT THE ENTRANCE
6" = 1'-0"4VIEW LOOKING NORTH
221
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
X05.2
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
REVIEW
2022-3
8/05/2022
STREETSIDE ECE -
ADDITIONAL 3D
VIEWSASPEN BURLINGAME ECECity of Aspen
PLEASE NOTE:
FOR REFERENCE - EXISTING PHASE 3 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE MASSING SHOWN
WITHOUT WINDOWS
6" = 1'-0"3AERIAL VIEW - LOOKING SOUTH
6" = 1'-0"1AERIAL VIEW - LOOKING EAST
6" = 1'-0"4AERIAL VIEW - LOOKING NORTH
6" = 1'-0"2AERIAL VIEW - LOOKING WEST
222
COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY
June 2022
1
Over 70 people took the community survey that was available on aspencommunityvoice.com
from May 11 – May 31. The survey results will be used to help inform the direction of design
decisions that will affect essential early childcare issues and services in our community.
Key takeaways from the survey include:
Who responded. The bulk of the survey respondents came from upvalley: 86.8% live in
Aspen. 84.6% of them live in Burlingame.
223
COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY
June 2022
2
Age range. The household age range represented the most was 40-65 (37), followed closely
by 6-18 (34). Under 3, under 6, 18-40 were about the same (25) with unborn and 65+ the
minority (10 responses.)
224
COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY
June 2022
3
Childcare need. Fifty-six respondents did not anticipate wanting to use the Burlingame Early
childhood Center once constructed, while 15 anticipated enrolling their children.
225
COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY
June 2022
4
You ranked the following classroom needs for 0-5-year-olds in order of importance. Integrating
fitness into the learning space had the highest rank, specialized activity spaces ranked next, and the
remaining three: health and wellbeing of students, teachers, and parents, safety and security, and
outdoor learning spaces rank almost equally.
Your rank of the following early childhood education facility features all roughly the same:
environmental sustainability 4.20, ease and proximity of parking 4.23, nursing space 4.78, parent
resource/hospitality area 5.13, quiet/private teacher workspaces 5.25, activity areas parents can use
with their enrolled children 5.37, community gathering spaces 5.47, integrated technology 5.88, with
mixing spaces for different classes/age groups to interact ranking the lowest.
226
COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY
June 2022
5
The aspects of outdoor play areas for young children most important to you are: nature-
based activities had the most votes with 43, followed by exercise space with 28, multi-sensory
exploration with 25, and natural materials with 17.
227
COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY
June 2022
6
The types of young children's play spaces in order of importance to you were by average
rank: dramatic play areas 4.02, STEM or STEAM focused play/learning areas 3.23, indoor
gross motor play areas 2.85, indoor fine motor play areas 2.75, and finally Outdoor play areas
2.06
The majority of you think that if there is housing on-site for teachers, it should be separate
from the Early Childhood Education Center.
228
COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY
June 2022
7
Comments:
Themes of concern (over 50% of total comments): Traffic, parking, noise, overall
neighborhood impact
Themes of suggestions: Preference given to Burlingame residences, housing for
teachers, appropriate wages for teachers, environmental design
229
JULY 13, 2022 NEIGHBORHOOD GATHERING &
PROJECT UPDATE | BURLINGAME COMMUNITY
CENTER
Kathleen Wanatowicz
Project Resource Studio
230
Outreach Summary
Date: Wednesday, July 13
Time: 5:00 pm – 7:00 pm
Location: Burlingame Commons Building
Total Community Attendance: Approximately 20 people from the Burlingame community attended, and
the event was widely publicized.
Objectives:
▪ Present and provide an overview of the two Design Schemes: Hillside & Streetside
▪ Meet and greet with the project team, introduce the experts
▪ Provide a review and follow-up on May’s Open House questions and community survey.
▪ Design Characteristics Boards (materials, designs, locations) – dot exercise
▪ Introduce traffic study goals
Stations:
▪ Welcome: Public Process and Project Information, May Survey Summary Sheets
▪ Site Plan Board with Constraints, Project Partners
▪ Hillside Design Scheme
▪ Streetside Design Scheme
▪ Design Characteristics – dot exercise
▪ Traffic Impacts
Summary:
The neighborhood gathering was a successful child-friendly event to bring attention to the project goals
and team. Participants were given feedback sheets per design schemes. The project team was on-site to
have discussions, answer questions, and gather design scheme preferences and feedback. The event was
low attendance, but the quality of feedback was targeted and valuable for the project team.*
231
Publicity:
* Highlighted text indicates the top votes
HILLSIDE DESIGN | COMMENTS 7.13.22
√ FEATURES & DESIGN DETAILS YOU LIKE AND CROSS OUT THOSE YOU DON’T
KEY FEATURES:
o DIRECT ON-GRADE ACCESS X4, 4
o HOUSING IS DETACHED, PART OF NEIGHBORHOOD 9
o ALL SURFACE PARKING X3, 5
o PRESCHOOL PLAYGROUND IS SOUTH FACING X1, 8
o 2 POSSIBLE POINTS OF ACCESS X1, 7
o INFANT & TODDLER PLAYGROUNDS AT GRADE X1, 7
o GROSS MOTOR ROOM ON MAIN FLOOR X1, 6
o GREATER CONNECTION TO NATURAL LANDSCAPE 11, (good)
Date Activity Reach
7.6.22 Email to Burlingame Community Burlingame
7.6.2022 Media Relations: Burlingame
community meeting
Public
7.6.2022, 7.13.2022 City of Aspen Facebook Post Public
7.6.2022 Aspen Community Voice Email –
Neighborhood Gathering for Burlingame
Early Childhood Education Center
Public
7.11.2022 Door Hangers for Burlingame
community meeting
Burlingame neighborhood
7.11.2022 Posters at the Bus Stops Burlingame
7.11.2022 Street Signs lining the entrance to
Burlingame
Burlingame
7.8, 11, 12, 13.2022 Display ads for Burlingame community
event in Aspen Times and Aspen Daily
News
Public
232
SITE CHALLENGES:
o INFANT & TODDLER PLAYGROUNDS ARE NORTH FACING X5 (cold & snowy, Not bad for summer)
o SLIGHTLY UNDER PARKED PER PROGRAM X3, (who cares), 2
o ENTRY IS NORTH FACING 3, (that’s ok)
o BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS VERY TIGHT TO SITE BOUNDARIES X2 (will be no matter what), 2
o REQUIRES MOVING THE MOST DIRT X2
o GROSS MOTOR ROOM BURIED X3
EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION BUILDING AREA:
o 13,274 GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF) X1, 2, (higher = better)
HOUSING AREA:
o 5,081 GSF 1
o 4 (2) BEDROOM UNITS 3
COMMENTS:
1. need more
2. not enough
3. not as much housing as street side design
PARKING AREA:
o 13,695 SF 1
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS:
1. Parking always a problem. It seems you always need more than planned I feel this option feels
less crowded – but at expense of housing employees
2. Love the access to trail from play areas
3. Detached housing makes me feel more comfortable. Not keen on strangers in the same building
while my kid is in day care
4. * this is our preferred design!!!*
5. It would be better to funnel traffic through the neighborhood, instead of the separate pull
in/out.
6. I like having the site off the road and in the corner. More outdoor play space.
233
7. I don’t have strong reservations about this version. For the folks that do end up utilizing this
housing, they might enjoy that it’s not on the same footprint where they work.
8. I prefer vehicle entry on Paepcke Drive in order to eliminate vehicle crossing trail midway down
Harmony Drive.
9. I like how the housing and building blend into Burlingame a bit more.
___________________________________________________________________
STREET SIDE DESIGN | COMMENTS 7.13.22
√ FEATURES & DESIGN DETAILS YOU LIKE AND CROSS OUT THOSE YOU DON’T
KEY FEATURES:
o ALL PLAYGROUNDS HAVE SOUTHERN EXPOSURE X1, 6
o PREFERRED SOLAR ORIENTATION FOR DAYLIGHTING & PV 7
o SOUTH FACING ENTRY 3
o FULLY PARKED PER THE PROGRAM 8 (partially underground)
o ALLOWS FOR SECONDARY NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY POINT X1, 5
o FRONTS THE STREET X1, 1 (kids oriented away from street)
o FIRE ACCESS FOR ECE PROGRAM IMPROVED 3
o GROSS MOTOR ROOM DAYLIT AND ON MAIN FLOOR 5
o ON-GRADE ENTRY 6 (without much parking)
o SECONDARY PRESCHOOL EXPLORATORY AREA 3
COMMENT: not keen on the bridges to access play area.
SITE CHALLENGES:
o PARKING IS STRUCTURED, PARTIALLY BELOW GRADE 2
o TAKES OVER HOUSING LOTS 4 & 5 3
o FIRE ACCESS FOR HOUSING COMPROMISED X2
234
EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION BUILDING AREA:
o 13,775 GROSS SQUARE FEET (GSF) 1
HOUSING AREA:
o 8,338 GSF 2
o 2 (1) BEDROOM UNITS 5
o 5 (2) BEDROOM UNITS 5, need more
COMMENTS:
1. Seems like the building will be huge if 7 units are on one floor. Don’t like that housing (strangers)
are in the same building as my kid.
2. This plan seems to make more efficient use of the space. I like that some of the parking is below
grade. Not bothered by the building being street side. I think more housing is better also.
3. I’d like to see entry to the parking lot on Paepche to eliminate the trail crossing, midway down
Harmony drive. Ped/bike/car interaction would be unsafe.
4. I like the 1 BD units and access from Harmony.
PARKING AREA:
o STRUCTURED 14,876 SF 1
o SURFACE - 10,373 SF
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS:
I prefer this concept bc it maximizes housing + parking – two of the larger issues.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
235
236
May 5, 2022 OPEN HOUSE | BURLINGAME
COMMUNITY CENTER
Kathleen Wanatowicz
Project Resource Studio
237
Outreach Summary
Date: Thursday, May 5
Time: 5:30 pm – 7:30 pm
Location: Burlingame Commons Building
Total Community Attendance: Approximately 20 people from the Burlingame community attended
Objectives:
▪ Pre-project launch with the Burlingame residents
▪ Provide a high-level overview of the process, goal, objectives, and outcomes
▪ Meet and greet with the project team, introduce the experts
▪ Affirm and review the feedback, and follow up on questions from September’s meeting.
▪ Evoke project inspiration and dialogue about preferences
▪ Introduce site limitations
Stations:
▪ Site Plan Board with Constraints
▪ Conceptual Design Boards
▪ Opportunity Board
▪ Public Process and Project Information
Summary:
The open house was a good event to bring attention to the project goals and team and initiate
conversations around preferences. The event was low attendance, but the quality of feedback was
excellent.
238
Publicity:
Sign-in sheet:
Date Activity Reach
4.29.22 Email to Burlingame Community Burlingame
5.1.2022 Posters at the Bus Stops Burlingame
5.2.2022 City of Aspen Facebook Post Public
5.3.2022 Aspen Community Voice Email – Open
House for Burlingame Early Childhood
Education Center
Public
5.3.2022 Door Hangers for Burlingame
community meeting
Burlingame neighborhood
5.3.2022 PSA re: Burlingame community meeting Public
5.3.2022 Ads for Burlingame community meeting
in Aspen Times and Aspen Daily News
Public
239
240
241
Questions and comments recorded with Burlingame neighbors – September 2
• Will the childcare space take away from the community space / parks and shared amenities?
• Can an incubation space for the business be started NOW to provide care and test the model
before we build a building that may or may not have staff? (former offices?)
• How will the costs of shared roads / community space / sidewalks be shared with the
Burlingame boards?
• Will some units in phase 3 be reserved for the teachers who work at the childcare space?
• How is this childcare going to be staffed without siphoning teachers from existing programs –
Early Learning Center, Aspen Mountain Tots, Cottage?
• What happens for the parking and drop-off, pick up areas?
• How will the additional traffic be handled when there are already long traffic light waits before
phase 3. (another person added that this was a good question)
• Where will parking be?
• How will the staffing issue be solved with this plan?
• Will Burlingame families have priority to reduce traffic?
• Will the single family homes still be built?
• What would hours be? Which school calendar will it follow? Pricing be determined?
• What is the timeline for approval and building?
• It would be great for daycare to be developed in a more transit-oriented location so it could be
accessed by bus. Nest to staffing difficulties, traffic and parking in Aspen proper for folks that
work in town is going to become very limited. Will the daycare building then be planned with it’s
own parking (separate from Burlingame residential parking)?
• Please consider repurposing the current underutilized community building in phase 1 @
Burlingame if you do move forward with any construction.
• If priority can be provided to Burlingame residents to the new childcare center at Burlingame,
then that can help reduce any concerns of additional traffic, parking etc.
• What is Kids First role in this project?
• What other locations are being considered?
• If a childcare or any other business come to Burlingame, then how does that work with the HOA
structure?
• Phone call – Bob Perlmutter wondered about using the commons building, conversation about a
larger space took place, he would like to be added to the email list.
• Neighbor comments/texts reported by Megan M.
o The stop light at 82 only allows for 3-4 cars at the most, afraid the cars from drop off
and pickup would be long.
o Parking impacts
o Insurance
242
o Unsafe parks in the neighborhood
o Traffic impacts
o Personal implications to adults consuming cannabis on own property if it is now near a
school
o Will the RO houses be lost for space?
o Can ECE teacher housing be included?
o Is there an emergency plan for evacuation with 1 exit out of the neighborhood? Even if
that golf course arm goes up in emergencies, the whole neighborhood funnels out the
one road.
Contact list that people signed up to be kept up to date:
Bob Perlmutter bobperl@hotmail.com
Laura Miller lauramiller1010@gmail.com
Ben Gottlieb beyondboundaries@mac.com
Anna Cheyne aspenpersson@hotmail.com
Maria Johnson maria80reynolds@yahoo.com
Michael Yang michaeltedyang@yahoo.com
Kathy Yang kathyyang@yahoo.com
Jessica Chimerakis Jessica.chimerakis@gmail.com
Nick Chimerakis nickchimerakis@gmail.com
Kelsey Carder Kel_clynn@yahoo.com
Rae Lampe raelampe@gmail.com
243
RESOLUTION NO.
Series of 2009)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, ACCEPTING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS
AND RESTRICTIONS OF BURLINGAME RANCH AFFORDABLE
HOUSING SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, at a duly called meeting of the homeowners' association convened on
October 28, 2009, at which a quorum was present, the Board of Directors
recommended the adoption of an amendment to the Declaration Of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions of Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing
Subdivision (hereinafter "Declarations"); and
WHEREAS, the amendment proposed to amend Article I, Section 32 to increase
the number of units that may be created from two-hundred thirty-six (236) to two-
hundred fifty-eight (258) Units, including within this total thirteen single family
homes; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment was presented to the Homeowners for
vote pursuant to Article XII, Section 6, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the amendment proposed was subject to and conditioned upon
certain obligations on the part of the City of Aspen outlined in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to such vote, eighty-nine (89) unit owners voted in favor of
the amendment, one (1) unit owner opposed the amendment. Consistent with the
Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, the City's cast its votes in favor of the
amendment. However, sixty-seven percent of the Unit owners, not including the
Units owned by the City, were required to pass the amendment. Thus, pursuant to
Article XII, Section 6, of the Declaration, as amended and CCIOA, this
amendment passed; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XII, Section 6(a) of the Declarations, such
amendment must be approved by the City of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XII, Section ti(c) of the Declazations, such
amendment must be recorded within the real property records of the County of
Pitkin, State of Colorado. A copy of the amendment for recording is attached
hereto as Exhibit "B".
244
NOW, WHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
Section One
That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby accepts and approves the
amendment to Article I, Section 32, of the Declazation of Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions of Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Subdivision set forth
below, as approved by the unit owners of Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing
Subdivision at a duly called meeting of the unit owners held on October 28, 2009:
Article I, Section 32, is hereby amended to read as follows:
Units that May be Created" means two-hundred fifty-eight
258) Units, including within this total thirteen single
family homes, which shall be the maximum number of
Units that may be subject to this Declaration.
Dated: November 23, 2009.
I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the
foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resoluti n dopted by the City Council
of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held
2009.
at yn S. Koc City Clerk
245
Ver 5 Sept. I, 2009 Exhibit A
Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Association, Inc.
Agreement/Understanding with the City of Aspen
Shall Article I, Section 32 of the Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Subdivision Declaration
be amended to allow for a density increase from 236113 to 258/13. The vote to increase density
is conditioned upon the adoption by Council Resolution within 90 days of the vote on the
increase in density of the following terms and conditions, and are part of an agreement to
amend this section of the declarations. If such resolution is not adopted by Council as set forth
herein this vote shall become null and void. Furthermore if any unit owner successfully
challenges the validity of this vote, the validity of the increase in the maximum number of units
that may be created or the validity of any expansion resulting from this action, then this
agreement shall become null and void and any obligations or commitments on the part of the
City shall be terminated ab initio.
258 total units (245 multi-family units and 13 single-family lots). The location of the b
additional SF home sites shall be agreed upon by city and owner representatives.
Z. Eliminate the $60 per month per unit mobility fee and amend the PUD accordingly.
The Burlingame home owners realize that bus service may increase or decrease according to
transportation budgets and demand.)
3. Retroactively forgive the Burlingame Ranch I Condominium Association, Inc. and the
Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Association, Inc. all unpaid mobility fees.
4. Amend the PUD to add additional parking to the development that would increase
the parking ratio from 1.67 to 2.0 (excluding the 26 "bandit" parking spaces behind
current tuck-in parking spaces from the calculation) and include visitor, loading zones
and handicapped spaces (as required by code).The City would retain the right to add
as many as 3 additional parking spots to the project total, dedicated to the CarShare
program -and not count those spots towards the new 2.0 ratio. (The funding for
additional parking is contingent on voter approval for phase II/III. The additional parking would be one
of the 1st projects sought in phase II/III The siting and design of the additional parking will be
developed in conjunction with homeowner representatives. The COA will commit to spending up to
lOK on temporary parking solutions on Mining Stock Pkwy Rd. to be completed by the end of June
2010. This includes moving sprinkler heads and boulders, grading the shoulder, pack the dirt and spread
gravel on the area.)
5. The COA will contribute $25,000.00 toward the completion of the commons bldg.
This money is not associated with the bond vote and so the city can contribute the funds whenever needed
for completion of finish work to commons building.)
6. Construct astaircase/sidewalk from Mining Stock Pkwy. to Callahan Court Parking
lot. (The funding for this project is contingent on voter approval for phase II/III and will be done in
conjunction with the additional parking to be provided in Phase I - as one of the In projects undertaken in
Phase 2/3.)
7. Emphasize open space in Phase II /lll, in particular buildings clustered around
courtyards with "usable open space" and sidewalks similar to the courtyard located
on Molly and Lindvig Courts, and create a minimum of 100 square feet of Usable
Open Space for every 1000 square feet of living space that is created in the design of
phase 111111. "Usable Open Space" refers to areas that are sodded with grass, not
native seeded areas and not all drainage basins, which are frequently inundated with
Page I of 5 246
Ver 5 Sept. I, 2009 Exhibit A
water and are unusable. (The City noted that after meeting with the O'Callaghans and reviewing our
budget for landscape maintenance that we likely do not have enough to cover our expenses currently. If we
would be willing to allow two of the SF homesites to stay in phase I then they could build another city park
at the NW corner of the phase II. This would be in addition to the 100 square ft of usable open space per
1000 square ft of livable space built in phase II. The city asks us to consider this carefully because our
budget will also go up. We should keep in mind that the city will maintain the 2^d city park at their
expense.)
8. Allow Owner Representatives or such other committee established by the Owner
Representatives to have input in all phases of design review.
9. Follow all design review guidelines and green building standards as required in Phase I.
Eliminate the requirement for the Master or Condominium Association to pay the
75 per space rental income to the City and will amend the Mobility Plan and PUD to
reflect this. If any spaces continue to be available for rental, the funds for such spaces
shall remain the property of the Master or Condominium Association, as applicable.
Complete its (COA) planned connector trail improvements from Burlingame
Ranch to the Airport Business Center and shall pursue its plans to provide a direct
route to the Roaring Fork River and the Rio Grande Trail and Bridge off the Airport
Business Center connector trail. (THE DESIGN OF A NARROW DIRT TRAIL IS CONTINUING
WHICH WILL CONNECT THE NORTH END OF BURLINGAME RANCH TO THE BUSINESS CENTER
THE CITY HAS CONTACTED PARKS DEPT. AND CONSTRUCTION MAY BEGIN AS EARLY AS THIS
FALL)
Z. No additional units will be built in Burlingame Ranch Phase I or Phase II/III in the
future, other than the number the owners approve in this vote or agree to under the
applicable standards of approval at whatever point in the future such changes will be
proposed.
3. Sign at entrance posting "No Dogs, Fines Imposed". (Will be part of a series of
insubstantial amendments" to the PUD.)
4. Speed limit reduction to 15 mph. (tragic study is complete and signs have ordered)
S. Audit of Association books prior to transfer of control to owner Board not
completed. (The COA has authorized the contract)
6. Provide Legal Corrections to Association governing documents (both
Condominium and Master Association) mandated by SB 89 and SB 100 and
recommendations or supporting language for policies that need to be adopted. (The
COA is working with the law firm, Ballard, Sparhr, Andrews and Ingersoll, LLP in Denver to complete all
revisions.)
7. Confirm all common areas have been properly conveyed to each association or
follow through and convey them.
Drainage: including safety grates on drainage culverts and correction of improperly
draining drainage detention areas. (DRAINAGE OF THE DETENTION AREAS HAVE
BEEN CORRECTED, POND 2 BEHIND 19 LINDVIG COURT HAS CONCRETE
FLOW CHANNELS AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IS WORKING WITH
STREETS DEPARTMENT TO OBTAIN OR FABRICATE GRATING FOR
CULVERTS. COA is not satisfied with the drainage of Pond 2 across from Transit I. They hove brought
this to Shaw's attention numerous times. If the city takes over this repair then it will have to go through a
public bid process. The COA is committed to resolving this problem.)
Page 2 of 5
247
Ver 5 Sept. I, 2009 Exhibit A
9. Erosion on path connecting Transit I to Roch Place. (The COA is planning to rebuild most
of this portion of the trail/walking path.)
Z~. Address water rights -provision of ditch water and lease from City for provision of
water for irrigation from City's ditch rights (at no cost to HOA). (The COA is working with
Ballard, Sparhr, Andrews and Ingersoll, LLP in Denver to complete a lease agreement)
Z ~ . Address landscaping: weeds issues, and properly complete seeded areas and
planting beds. (The COA has completed all reseeding; we will have to wait for next summer to observe
the successful germination and growth or lack thereof.)
ZZ. The Condo I Board is requesting the installation of boulders to help prevent the
irrigation from being damaged by cars. (The city is willing to help with this. The city also notes
that the sprinkler heads that are being damaged are at 18 from the side of the road and therefore can
only be damaged by individuals deliberately driving off the road.)
23. Address and repair all issues raised by third party roof commissioner and address
hazardous areas identified by O'Callaghan. (ROOF WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED
TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ROOF COMMISSIONING AGENT AND THE
SNOW DROP AREAS IDENTIFIED WILL RECEIVE SNOW FENCING. )
24. Address all Phase I punch list and warranty issues presented by Board and
O'Callaghan Prop Mgt. Phase 1 punchlist and warranty issues include:
d~ The fire system has more than the average trouble codes, error codes, dact, and
communication errors. Progaurd is aware of the buildings that have chronic
problems and have been meeting with Seimens to find a solution. The system is
going to require slot of Technical work to get the problems fixed. The buildings
involved include, but are not limited to: 42 Mining Stock Place ("MSP"), 99 MSP,
129 MSP, 44 Callahan Court ("CC"), 45 CC, 185 Forge Road ("FR"), 19 Lindvig
Court ("LC"). (PROGUARD IS WORKING TO RESOLVE ALL ISSUES AND THE CITY
IS WAITING ON THEIR REPORT OF CONDITIONS. SEIMENS IS SENDING A NEW
PANEL FOR INSTALLATION AND TESTING. IF THIS PANEL SOLVES THE ISSUES
THEN THEY WILL REPLACE TROUBLESOME. IF THIS PANEL DOES NOT RESOLVE
THE ISSUES THEN MORE TROUBLESHOOTING MUST BE DONE. THIS IS NOT A
FIRE REPORTING DEFECT THAT WOULD JEPORDIZE THE REPORTING OF A FIRE. )
b~ Fire Sprinkler system commissioning completion. Pro Guard did not complete a
review of storage areas, which are causing system malfunctions. (PROGUARD IS
WORKING TO RESOLVE ALL ISSUES AND THE CITY IS WAITING ON THEIR REPORT
OF CONDITIONS.)
C~ There are several areas in which the siding is popping out, or cracked, and the
paint is either peeling or the wrong color. Shaw has fixed some of the areas that
were popped out and are in the process of getting the rest replaced. They are in
contact with the manufacturer to find a solution for the peeling and discolored
paint. (SHAW IS ADDRESSING THIS AS A WARRANTY ISSUE AND IS SCHEDULE FOR
CORRECTIVE ACTION IN AUGUST.)
d~ 163 FR has a small gas leak in the mechanical room. Source Gas confirmed that
the meter was not installed by them and did not belong to them. (THE METER
WAS PART OF THE TESTING PROGRAM BY THE NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY
LABORTORY IN BOULDER. THE METER HAS BEEN REMOVED.)
C~ 124 FR, 170 FR, 99 MSP have had blowers replaced due to a leak or gush of water
coming down from the ceiling onto the boiler. 170 FR was checked in the
Page 3 of 5 248
Ver S Sept. I, 2009 < Exhibit A
mechanical room by John Y (who?). and he said he didn't see any water at the time
however he did not go into the units above to investigate the bath /shower to see
if this was the source of the water. (SHAW IS ADDRESSING THIS AS A WARRANTY
ISSUE.)
fl The staircase lighting at 34 Molly Court ("MC") has not worked for more than 2
years. The City's Property Manager Terri Kappelli was aware of this issue due to
constantly burning out light fixtures. The electrician came out to look at it but
didn't have time to fix it. His suspicion was that the wiring inside the storage unit
next to the stairs had been damaged. (SHAW HAS ADDRESSED THIS AS A
WARRANTY ISSUE. COMPLETE.)
g~ The common building 2nd bathroom area has the installed but there is no grout.
THIS BATHROOM WAS NOT TO BE FINISHED AND WAS NOT TO EVEN BE TILED
THEREFORE THE TILE THAT WAS INSTALL WAS NOT GROUTED.)
1~There are some circulating pumps that are not wired, including but not limited to
42 MSP. (SHA W IS ADDRESSING THIS AS A WARRANTY ISSUE.)
1~ 124 FR common entrance door to the storage units is missing the lock. (SHAW IS
ADDRESSING THIS AS A WARRANTY ISSUE; MATERIALS HAVE BEEN ORDERED.)
170 FR is missing the common entrance storage door, the entire door! (SHAW IS
ADDRESSING THIS AS A WARRANTY ISSUE; MATERIALS HAVE BEEN ORDERED.)
55 MSP unit 102 and 129 MSP unit 102 have uncompleted landscaping dirt areas
underneath the bedroom windows. The neighborhood cats have made these areas
into litter boxes. (SHAW HAS ADDRESSED THIS AS A WARRANTY ISSUE AND IT IS
COMPLETE.)
67 MC dirt area between the parking lot and sidewalk is not landscaped per the
City's plans and specifications.. (COA DESIGNING PLAN. NO SHRUBS WILL BE
PLANTED BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE DESTOYED BY SNOW REMOVAL.)
Rl~ 170 FR, 129 MSP, and 44 CC -snow slides either from upper roof or solar
panels onto the stairs or the side walk. Steve Bossart is aware of the issues and
will be contacting Roof Tech. (SHA W IS ADDRESSING THIS AS A WARRANTY ISSUE;
MATERIALS HAVE BEEN ORDERED.)
Il~The entrance doors to the trash /recycling areas at transit 2 & 3 do not close
properly. Rick Wilson had worked on them but as soon as they were unhooked for
the trash removal they wouldn't close again. The City shall oversee and pursue
this issue unto completion and to the satisfaction of O'Callaghan and the Owner
Representatives. (SHAW IS ADDRESSING THIS AS A WARRANTY ISSUE.)
O~There are dead trees that require replacement at the following locations:
Retention Pond behind the single family houses/lots, 123 FR unit 201 parking lot
side, 123 FR unit 206 parking lot side, 185 FR parking lot side between units 102 &
103, 185 FR at the end of the parking lot next to the side street, in between 185 FR
163 FR street side, 123 FR between units 202 & 203 street side, MSP big sod area
I st tree closest to the common building, 55 MSP next to unit 201, 161 MSP in front
of unit 204 half dead. (THIS WAS A WARRANTY ITEM AND WORK OF
REPLACEMENT IS COMPLETE.)
Native grass at 185 FR parking lot side is very sparse and unsatisfactory. (SHAW
AND THE CITY HAVE RESEEDED THESE AREAS SEVERAL TIMES.)
Page 4 of 5 249
Ver 5 Sept. I, 2009 Exhibit A
42 MSP all the bushes on the courtyard side at unit 105 died, were removed by
O'Callaghan and require replacement. (SHAW IS ADDRESSING THIS AS A
WARRANTY ISSUE; WORK IS COMPLETE.)
I'~ 42 MSP courtyard side in front of unit 106 is not landscaped per the City's plans
and specifications. (SHAW IS ADDRESSIGN THIS AS A WARRANTY ISSUE; WORK IS
COMPLETE.)
S~ Parking signage needs to be installed and re-striping requires completion. (We are
aware that City staff is wolfing for input for Burlingame Condo 1 Board members. CITY
HAS DEVELOPED A PLAN FOR THE ROAD RIGHT OF-WAYS AND THE HOA PARKING
AREAS. THE CITY IS WORKING WITH THE STREETS DEPARTMENT TO ORDER AND
INSTALL SIGNS ALONG THE STREETS AND WILL WORK WITH THE HOA WHEN SO
DIRECTED WITHIN THE PARKING LOTS.)
t~ Weed Removal (The type of weeds, the location of those weeds, and the method of removal will be
decided at a meeting on site; at least one board member from the Condo Board and one member of
the Master Association board -must be a homeowner, not city staff -will be present to approve the
conditions of removal. The conditions of removal will be approved in writing; a representative from the
COA Parks department and Asset department must also be present; the weeds will then be removed
by pulling, cutting or spraying, one time only, within two weeks; after this one-time event the City of
Aspen will be relieved of any and all responsibility for removal of weeds.)
Page 5 of 5 250
RECEPTION#: 564794, 11/25/2009 at
11:02:05 AM,
t of 3, R $15.00 Doc Code AMEND DEC
Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO
AMENDMENT
TO THE
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF BURLINGAME RANCH AFFORDABLE
HOUSING,SUBDIVISION '
WHEREAS, Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of
Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Subdivision was recorded October 10,
2005 at Reception Number 516002, in the real property records of the County of
Pitkin, State of Colorado; and '
WHEREAS, Recordation of Signature Page for Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions o£ Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing
Subdivision was recorded April 17, 2006 at Reception Number 523046, in the real
props=rty records of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; and
WHEREAS, an Amendment to the Declazation of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions of Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Subdivision was recorded
October 21, 2009 at Reception Number 563774, in the real property records of the
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, which amended the requirements for an
amendment to the Declazations regazding the increase in Units that may be
created as-set forth in Article I,~Section 32; and
WHEREAS, at a duly called meeting of the homeowners' association convened on
October 28,.2009, at which a quonun was present, a motion was presented to adgpt
ari amendment to the Declazation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of
Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the amendment proposed was submitted to a vote of the
Association as follows:
Shall Article I, Section 32, be amended as follows, with text being
removed is delineated with strikethrough, '''^°` `-°~°^ ~^--~^•'°d
and Text being added is bold and underline. Text
being added looks like this:
Units that May be Created" means ~ '•'~°`''°'' "''''" °'°
E23H) two-hundred fifty-eight (2581. Units, including within
this total thirteen single family homes, which shall be the
maximum number of Units that may be subject to this
Declaration."
and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment was presented to the Homeowners for
vote pursuant to Article XII, Section 6(a) and 6(d), as amended; and
251
WHEREAS, pursuant to such vote, eighty-nine (86) unit owneis voted in favor
of the amendment, one (1) unit owner opposed the amendment. Pursuant to
Article XII, Section 6(d) of the Declarations and state statute, this amendment
passed; and '
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen by Resolution No.~ ;Series of 2009, approved
and consented to this amendment as required by Article XII, Section 6(c) of the
Declazation.
NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendment shall be incorporated into and
become part of the Declazation of Covenants, Conditions-and Restrictions of
Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Subdivision:
Article I, Section 32, is hereby amended as follows, with text being
removed is delineated with strikethrough, Tyr o~= :b -r:,mov
lf~el~C-like-thi^, and Text being added is bold and underline. _ Text
being added looks like this:
Units that May be Created" means ~ '- ''`°'' `'''''° "'° "~~' tWO-
hundred fifty-eight (258) Units, including within this total thirteen
single family homes, which shall be the maximum number of Units
that may be subject to this Declazation."
Henceforth, Article I, Section 32 of the Declazation of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions of Bwlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Subdivision shall read as follows:
Units that May be Created" means two-hundred fifty-eight (258)
Units, including within this total thirteen single family homes, which
shall be the maximum number of Units that may be subject to this
Declaration."
IN WITNESS WEREOF, this Amendment to the Declaration of Covenants, _
Conditions and Restrictions of Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing
Subdivision, is here y executed by the President of the Subdivision Association
on this ~'n^day of~, 2009, pursuant to a duly conducted vote of e Unit
Owners. ~~
Tom McCabe
President of ,Burlingame
Ranch Affordable Housing
Association, Inc.
Attest:
Jafm Laatsch
ecretary
Notarization offollowing page.)
252
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day o~~009, by Tom
McCabe, President of Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Association, Inc.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
MjOenniMla- E~Yw Oi~QfPOIs
253
RESOLUTION NO. ~~
Series of 2009)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, ACCEPTING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS
AND RESTRICTIONS OF BURLINGAME RANCH AFFORDABLE
HOUSING SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, at a duly called meeting of the homeowners' association convened on
September 30, 2009, at which a quorum was present, the Boazd of Directors
recommended the adoption of an amendment to the Declaration Of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions of Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing
Subdivision (hereinafter "Declarations"); and
WHEREAS, the amendment proposed to amend Article XII, Section 6(d) for a
specific limited time with regard to the vote required to increase units and with
regard to the voting limitations set forth within Article II, Section 2, of the
Declarations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment was presented to the Homeowners for
vote pursuant to Article XII, Section 6(a); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to such vote, ninety-two (92) unit owners voted in favor of
the amendment, one (1) unit owner opposed the amendment. Of those votes,
eighty (80) of the multi-family units casts votes in favor of the amendment with
none (0) opposed and twelve (12) of the single family units casts votes in favor of
the amendment, with one (1) opposed. Pursuant to Article XII, Section 6(a) and
Article II, Section 2, of the Declarations and state statute, this amendment passed;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XII, Section 6(a) of the Declarations, such
amendment must be approved by the City of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XII, Section 6(c) of the Declarations, such
amendment must be recorded within the real property records of the County of
Pitkin, State of Colorado. A copy of the amendment for recording is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A".
NOW, WHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
Section One
That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby accepts and approves the
amendment to Article XII, Section 6(d), of the Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions of Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing
254
Subdivision set forth below, as approved by the unit owners of Burlingame Ranch
Affordable Housing Subdivision at a duly called meeting of the unit owners held
on September 30, 2009:
Article XII, Section 6(d), is hereby amended by adding the
following sentence at the end of the section:
Notwithstanding the limitations set forth herein, on or
before November 30, 2009, the provision of the Declaration
that defines the number of Units that may be created,
Article I, Section 32, may be amended to increase the
number of units that may be created by a vote or consent of
sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Owners, not including the
Declarant. Thereafter, the consent required for such
amendment shall be unanimous. In addition, any vote on
the increase in the number of units prior to November 30,
2009, shall not be subject to the limitation of Article II,
Section 2, which restricts the multi-family units to forty-
nine percent (49%) of any vote of the association.
Dated: October 13, 2009.
o-ZU- 09
Mi ae reland, Mayor
I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the
foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution ad to by the City Coun~l
of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held „ /~ ~i~
2009.
7
Kathryn S. Kochs'Qity Clerk
255