Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.320 Midland Ave.0037.2014.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN FILE 1 OF 3 City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0037.2014.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 273718106001 PROJECTS ADDRESS 320 MIDLAND AVE PLANNER SARA NADOLNY CASE DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE CURTIS SANDERS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 6.30.14 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 7.30.14 3 I File Edit_ Record h&dgate Farm Reports Format Tab Help lump f _., Q Main Custom Fads Routing S#alas f ee Summary I Actions Ring History Permit type aslu AsrEn Land Use Permit# 027.2014 r,SLU - - Address 220 MIDLANEAVE Apusuite ff t City �GPtd State CC Zip R1 11 a Permit Information I _ JD Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied 0411&2014 1 Q $ Project Status pending Approved Description R' CEN7,41 LOT 000NIS7RAC74SNGLEFAMILY Issued HOME,HA:R= UiR�S 01#E RES EPt f 14�DESr,,N S-A�DAPLI�ARi4 NCE Closed/Final b Submitted HASSL4.t;DPL-492Ei 1P Clock Running Days 0 Expires 0 41 KC1E j I Submitted via 1 � l Owner Last name H71,1 PROPER;ES LLC First name 1tt20 ONE BRAR Phone _ Address it s Applicant Owner is applicant? Contractor is applicant? Last name H,,,M PROPER LLC First name 1 Cy00 S ON faR 1111 4.R LAS VE^.nS IN Rat Phone ;70217'22-27f 17 Cust# 29 r 0 Address Lender Last name First name Phone ;t - Address P f .....,,,,.,,..._...._._.,m ...,......,._........ .,,,,,.,, .____ Enter the permit description AspenGold5(serve[] djamam View 1 of 1 RECEPTION#: b 11957,07/18/2014 at 03:20:36 PM, 1 of 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION No. 10 (SERIES OF 2014) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD FOR LOT 1 OF THE EAST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 320 MIDLAND AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. Parcel Identification Number: 2737-181-06-001 WHEREAS, HTM Properties, LI.0 submitted a request for a Residential Design Standard Variance to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the Moderate-Density Residential (R-15A) zone district; and WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended denial of the Residential Design Standard Variance; and WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on July 15, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, upon review and consideration of the recommendation of the Community Development Department, presentation from the Applicant, and consideration of the proposal, approves the review as outlined in this resolution; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets all applicable development standards to meet the criteria for granting a Residential Design Standard Variance, per Land Use Code Section 26.410.020.D.2.a, and approves this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 The Planning and Zoning Commission approves the request for a variance from the Residential Design Standard found at Section 26.410.040.D — Build-to lines, which states, "On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, at least sixty percent (60%) of the front fagade shall be within five (5) feet of the minimum front yard setback line..." The variance will permit the Applicant to locate only approximately twenty-six percent (26%) of the front fagade within five feet(5')of the required front yard setback line, as reflected in Exhibit A. 1 Section 2• This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided,and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 15`h day of July,2014. APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4LJ Erspamer,Chairman Deb uinn,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: — 4:i-�7 Cindy KJob,Records Manager Attachment: Exhibit A - Site Plan 2 MIDLAND AVENUE F N04 54 OQ'H 120.37' 'r g! a a s x 0 0 • . ss .s • • • • �« .• • • Asa a • •• • • w er � • .�E 4L • s L• w w • •� R L, •L W q ® Ij� • Sv An 0 o s + 4 •r 1 • .n • • . ••• •a awux • s � n. � •� = 28 OOW • z 121.07' .s • • • V1 P► My V c. AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, July 15, 2014 REGULAR MEETING: 4:30 p.m. Sister Cities room 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen I. ROLL CALL II. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. Public III. MINUTES IV. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST V. PUBLIC HEARINGS — A) 320 Midland Ave. —Residential Design Standards Variance B) Rubey Park Remodel — Planned Development Amendment VI. OTHER BUSINESS VII. ADJOURN Next Resolution Number: Typical Proceeding Format for All Public Hearings 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of hearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met. Revised April 2, 2014 Amok 0 As MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planning Technician THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Community Development Director MEETING DATE: July 15, 2014 RE: 320 Midland Ave. - RDS Variance Request APPLICANT/OWNER: SUMMARY: HTM Properties, LLC The Applicant requests the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the application for a variance REPRESENTATIVE: from the Residential Design Standard for build-to Mitch Haas, Haas Land Use Planning lines. A variance will allow the Applicant to place the proposed building approximately 50' back from the LOCATION: property line, rather than maintaining 60% of the front Lot 1, East Meadow Subdivision, fagade within 5' of the front yard setback, or 30' from commonly known as 320 Midland the property line, as required by Code. Ave. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: CURRENT ZONING&USE Staff recommends denial of the application for This property is located in the Residential Design Standard Variance regarding Site Moderate-Density Residential (R- Design - Build-to Lines. 15A) zone district. The lot is currently vacant. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is proposing to construct a single family residence on the site. Figure A: Image of subject property as seen from Smuggler Grove. 1 d BACKGROUND: The ,3 subject site is located in the R-15A residential zone district, in the East Meadows Subdivision, outside of the designated Aspen Infill Area. The total lot size is 9,849 sq. ft., and is currently T t vacant. The parcel sits • adjacent to three streets - Mascotte Ln. to the north, Midland Ave. to ¢ ' the west, and Smuggler Grove Rd. to the south. Smuggler Grove is a private street. An Administrative Interpretation was issued on September 27, 2013 w that designated Smuggler Grove as the front of the parcel. ` Figure B:Vicinity Map LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: Residential Design Standards Variance pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410.020.D. Variances from the Residential Design Standards may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission if one of the two following criteria is found to be met: 1. The variance will provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard, or 2. Is clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. This application is required to undergo Residential Design Standards review for the construction of a new single family home. The Applicant is requesting a variance from the following Residential Design Standard. • Build-to Lines. On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, at least sixty percent (60%) of the front fagade shall be within five (5) feet of the minimum front yard setback line. For reference, in the R-15 zone district the minimum 2 0 front yard setback line is 25', so 60% of the front fagade is required to be within 30' of the property line. STAFF CONMENTS: The Residential Design Standards were created to preserve established neighborhood scale and character and to ensure Aspen's neighborhoods are public places conducive to walking. The purpose of this specific standard is to encourage a relationship between development and the street. Locating buildings significantly farther back on the site than permitted by the Code diminishes the relationship between the building and the street, and detracts from the pedestrian experience. The subject parcel is a flat, vacant lot. There are seven other lots along Smuggler Grove Rd. with building dates ranging from 1894 - 2007 (Exhibit C-1). Neighboring properties 63 and 73 Smuggler Grove Rd. are the only residences constructed after the standard's 2005 adoption into the Code. At 63 Smuggler Grove an administrative request for a variance related to the build-to line was denied, and the current residence meets the standard. At 73 Smuggler Grove the building received a variance from the front set-back standard (per Resolution No. 3, Series of 2002) from the Board of Adjustment, permitting this residence to be situated closer to the street than would normally be allowed, despite Staff's recommendation of denial. The majority of the remaining residences that were constructed prior to the adoption of the standard vary in setback measurements. However, the redevelopment of any of these residences will require the same Residential Design Review, with the expectation that the redevelopment will meet this standard. The Applicant has indicated that the trees at the front of the property might create a hardship requiring the proposed building to be set back further than allowed by Code in order for the trees to be maintained on the site. The Parks : e ; Dept. has performed a site visit and has found a number of these trees to be damaged or diseased (see Exhibit D, Parks Dept. Referral). None of these are heritage trees that would require being maintained on-site. A number of these trees may require q removal in the near future. Furthermore, it is possible to meet the building siting standard while maintaining the majority of these trees on-site. Staff does not find Figure C: Image of subject site as viewed from rear of property any condition associated with the property that would require the granting of a variance due to a site-specific constraint. 3 achieved. Staff's goal is to reduce the existing number of non-conformities throughout the City, and new development provides the opportunity for this to occur. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the request for a Residential Design Standard Variance at this location, finding the criteria for a variance to not be met. RECOMMENDED MOTION (This Resolution is written in the affirmative): If the Planning and Zoning Commission chooses to approve for the requests, they may use this motion: "I move to approve the request for the Residential Design Standard Variance Review for 320 Midland Ave." If a Resolution is passed denying the request minor changes to the Resolution are required. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A— Site Plan Exhibit B— RDS Variance—Review Criteria Exhibit C— Neighborhood Images Exhibit D— Parks Dept. Referral Exhibit E— Application Exhibit F— Public Notice 4 RESOLUTION No._ (SERIES OF 2014) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD FOR LOT 1 OF THE EAST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 320 MIDLAND AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. Parcel Identification Number: 2737-181-06-001 WHEREAS, HTM Properties, LLC submitted a request for a Residential Design Standard Variance to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the Moderate-Density Residential (R-15) zone district; and WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended denial of the Residential Design Standard Variance; and WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on July 15, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, upon review and consideration of the recommendation of the Community Development Department, presentation from the Applicant, and consideration of the proposal, approves the review as outlined in this resolution; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets all applicable development standards to meet the criteria for granting a Residential Design Standard Variance, and approves this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 The Planning and Zoning Commission approves the request for a Variance from the Residential Design Standard found at Section 26.410.040.D — Build-to lines, which states, "On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, at least sixty percent (60%) of the front fagade shall be within five (5) feet of the minimum front yard setback line..." The variance will permit the Applicant to locate the residential unit approximately 52'from the minimum front property line, as shown in Exhibit A. 1 Section 2• This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 15th day of July, 2014. U Erspamer, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deb Quinn,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Cindy Klob,Records Manager Attachment: Exhibit A - Site Plan 2 t--�—� MIDLAND AVENUE jig g § YSI OO A9 t 20.37' %a r td rye s BF Q N04 54 OOW — T •a ZE Id s••s � • f •a �i 0 0 $ a 's � � 1 . • o s. .a ®� •• G� .Y ,ro Y• � rt •Y •Y �Y sY !! ! •Y f+ W �= • • • T • • Y. Y. m CO—28 DOW 121.07' • • . 0 Fr P'r 1•M r^ r V Exhibit A Site Plan �a MASCOTTE LANE S81 30 DOE • � 88.00' • a fi mn � 1 • LU n •u S • • O • rv� • • 1 IB n � ,6, • urt• • 1•lI B1C F8 (� •• � ,. m • �7 ri • • 11 a j � • in Y � 60•! • b Q Y •� .Y- - 16Y NE PE - �- • Q i q � Q' ' / q i 479 411 OOW 70.' 9.0 1xe,ura ovx Na oewl6ocx uaraeev a®wwae J10 YIlND AFL. �CO 11tH U.14 M 'YIN 1618. A 0 t G+ me l�etl f,m•1«so v GROVE ROAD wer i6ue »: � aao ow•A41 og +a BBB s �• -„= SCH-1 = WALKER DESIGN SERVICES 970-379-3636 Exhibit B Review Criteria Section 26.410.020.D.2 Variances from the Residential Design Standards, Section 26.410.040, which do not meet this Section may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Historic Preservation Commission, if the project is subject to the requirements of Chapter 26.415. An applicant who desires to consolidate other requisite land use review by the Historic Preservation Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning Commission may elect to have the variance application decided by the board or commission reviewing the other land use application. An applicant who desires a variance from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variance, if granted would: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or Staff Response: The purpose of the standard is to encourage development that addresses the street in a manner that serves to establish the neighborhood scale and promotes a favorable pedestrian environment. Locating the development significantly farther back on the site than permitted by the Code diminishes the relationship between the building and the street, and detracts from the pedestrian experience. The subject parcel is a corner lot, currently vacant, and the proposed development will be the first residential unit on the north side of Smuggler Grove Rd. There are 7 other lots along this street, with building dates ranging from 1894 — 2007. Within this subdivision 7 of the 8 total lots are parcels measuring less than 15,000 sq.ft. Many of the existing homes on these lots do not adhere to the build-to line standard, however, these were built prior to the adoption of the residential design standard. The redevelopment of any of these existing residences will require the same Residential Design Review, with the expectation that any redesigns will meet this standard. As a rule, Staff feels that when the RDS is able to be accomplished the design should reflect this. Staff does not recommend the granting of a variance when the Residential Design Standard is able to be achieved. Staff's goal is to reduce the existing number of non-conformities throughout the City, and this new development provides the opportunity for this to occur. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: The subject parcel is a flat, standard rectangular site measuring 9,849 sq.ft. in size. The Applicant has expressed interest in siting the proposed development approximately 27' back from the minimum front yard setback line of 25' in order to 1 maintain the trees in the front yard. According to the standard, at least 60% of the residence should be located within S' of the minimum-front yard setback line. The City's Parks Dept. was consulted for an opinion on maintaining the trees along Smuggler Grove. Parks Staff did not find any trees in this area that met the size of a heritage tree, which must be maintained on-site. Furthermore, Parks Staff commented on a fair number of trees in this area that have been damaged and may need removal in the near future. Staff does not find any unusual site-specific constraints that would obligate the granting of a variance. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. 2 Exhibit C-1 — Neighborhood Images � � a 0 + 1965/1967 1$'67/19 ." 2007 u 23 37 -3. 2006 i S'OFL(raGLL R-15A_,w. r � t 312. 1976 1967/1968 x � �: •• •'� �-1� 1'' 'fit �"t�+l. ./ �,!ll�,���,,,�f Smuggler Grove Rd lots referencing years of building construction. I I I R � {{i .� ���� �' . .• ;. yam , -: FS. ' IL 43 Smuggler Grove Constructed 1965/1967 I, ?V `- _. 9 , f z 63 Smuggler Grove Constructed 2007 � d r 73 Smuggler Grove r Constructed 2006 55 Smuggler Grove � 4 s Constructed i + 4.',. ^t e rF � N �c Td 1 @Ry % �J r ♦"� M�► J� � {tom kC ir'�x r5 t' 28 Smuggler Grove Constructed 1967/1968 Exhibit D Parks Dept. Referral In regards to the trees on the property at 320 Midland, the applicant must submit a tree removal permit to the Parks Department along with a detailed map showing which trees they would like to remove (identifying the trees with tape in the field would also help). Once submitted, the City Forester will go out to the property and inspect the trees and make a decision as to whether or not there will be any mitigation required. As you are aware, Ben Carlsen is our new Forester who will be making the determination regarding the outcome of this request. Mitch Hass is correct in the assumption that the Parks Department would like to preserve the trees on this property and that mitigation may be required for any conifers (pine or spruce) that exceeds 4 inches in diameter as well as any deciduous (trees with leaves) trees that have a diameter greater than 6 inches. I am not certain if there is any native material (choke cherry or gambel oak, for example) on this property, but if there is, the diameter is 3 inches for their removal.The applicant does not need to mitigate or even need a tree removal permit for any trees or native material that does not meet our code requirements. If you need further clarification or would like me to expound more, please do not hesitate to ask. - David Radeck, Project Technician, Parks Department As it pertains to Mitch's comments about 'Parks wanting to preserve trees where we can', I want to make sure that everyone understands that we strive to preserve trees appropriate for preservation. There are several trees on this property with various issues such as insect/disease, mechanical wounds, root issues, etc. There are also trees on this site without any of these obvious conditions. Just because a tree has one or more of these types of issues, doesn't mean it can't survive and do well for years to come. There are uncertainties of tree longevity based upon cultural, mechanical, and environmental fluctuations on the site, and for these reasons, it doesn't always make sense to tell someone to redesign their home or ask for variances based upon trees with various defects. Tree preservation must be based upon the current and future condition of the site, not just the current condition of individual trees. As for mitigation dollars owed, this will be based upon the City Forester's evaluation onsite once the applicant has submitted a tree removal permit application, as Dave stated in his response. - Chris Forman, Parks Operations Manager, Parks Department 6"ym l,b; AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 1f 2014x`4'9091y-% __' 20 14. STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, �G (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the _ day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The naives and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, suminarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) r v • ' it Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. SignatLfe The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 26 day of 244, by ec��-�'''e''"� WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL I PUBLIC NOTICE RE:320 MIDLAND AVE- RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE REQUEST My commission expires: 61 (} f 6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing t will in held mi Tuesday,July tie Roo at i meet- 6�� _ing to begin at 4:30 p.m.before the Planning and Zo to Commission,Sister Cities Room,City Hall, 130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to consider an applica- tion submitted by HTM Properties,LLC,of 10200 Notary Public Stone Briar,Las Vegas,NV 89144,for the proper- Public - tylocated at 320 Midland Ave,represented by Haas Land Planning,LLC.The applicant is re- - questing a Residential Design Standard Variance i related to Site Design-Build-to lines.The property is legally described as Lot 1,East Meadows Subdi- vision,Parcel ID 2737-181-06-001. For further in- formation,contact Sara Nadolny at the City of As- pen Community Development Department,130 S. Gaolnv�citvofaslena St.,Aspen,CO,(970)429.2739,saran ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: cen.com T� st U Erspamer,Chair PUBLICATION Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on June 26,20,a I OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) (,0306792) * LlJ 1 up 1 ti.0 OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED '... i BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 �x AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 320 h�JkkGnA Ar�� , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 2011+0 W 90 fl r►n , 20 14- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, �A,atv, cJc (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to, the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and go>;ern7nental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, surmnanzed and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) a Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and. new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text mnendment. Wlienever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business Hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. !1/l Signa e The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 26 day L,.,,,.Q, , 20(4,by of WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE RE:320 MIDLAND AVE- //,, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE REQUEST My COjnrn'j$$lOn eXpires. �- 6 ,/�V NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday,July 15,2014,at a meet- ing to begin at 4:30 p.m.before the Planning and Zoning Commission,Sister Cities Room,City Hall, 130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to consider an applica- tion submitted by HTM Properties,LLC,of 10200 NOtary Public Stone Briar,Las Vegas,NV 89144,for the proper- ty located at 320 Midland Ave,represented by Haas Land Planning,LLC.The applicant is re- questing a Residential Design Standard Variance related to Site Design-Build-to lines.The property is legally described as Lot 1,East Meadows Subdi- vision,Parcel ID 2737-181-06-001. For further in- formation,contact Sara Nadolny at the City of As- - pen Community Development Department,130 S. - Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970)429.2739,Sara nad- ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: . o�@cdvofasoen.com. s!LJ Erspamer,Chair PUBLICATION Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on June 26,2014 I OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) (1o3os792) a L1 J 1 up 1 tip— OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: n �7oZC7 I' oLI&t�V Ayu,. , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: JaL,y 16 2014 Ch STATE OF COLORADO ) JUL 10 2014 ss. ., .. 11 Y („1 i- r'�-S i- E N County of Pitkin I, �� < h t^ �� (name,please print) being or representi g an App icant to the City of Asp 6b, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the2kfi of J 1J✓!� , 201, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) AIL Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by-repeal of this-Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notic " was acknowledged before me this iD day of v l , 20N, by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My is ' n e pires: J CHRISTOPHER LUNDGREN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO o a h NOTARY ID 20144000722 COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.09,2018 ATTACHMENTS AS APP=LICABLE: - - - - • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 320 midland Ave—residential design variance request NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 15, 2014, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen, to consider an application submitted by HTM Properties, LLC, of 10200 Stone Briar, Las Vegas, NV 89144, for the property located at 320 Midland Ave, represented by Haas Land Planning, LLC. The applicant is requesting a Residential Design Standard Variance related to Site Design—Build-to lines. The property is legally described as Lot 1, East Meadows Subdivision, Parcel ID 2737-181-06-001. For further information, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen, CO,- - - (970)429.2739, sara.nadolnv-((t�,cityofaspen.com. s/L_Erspamer,Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on June 26,2014 City of Aspen Account ff a . 4A +' .� r � . •' � 4 � a fix AP At Jet ' iL ti's,�:' . '."'• � ^-_i fi- i y ps i �� • _ r R 'f dr � s 1207 EAST HOPKINS HOLDINGS LLC 404 PARK AVENUE LLC AMES MARTHA E 400 E MAIN ST 132 W MAIN ST#C 23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ARNAL ALVARO JOSE ASPEN ASSET LLC BAKKEN JOHN & LIZA N 326 MIDLAND AVE#201 2701 MIDLAND AVE#8312 PO BOX 12064 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 816014395 ASPEN, CO 81612 BENNETT NEIL J BESTIC JEFFREY B BEYER ALAN R 214 PARK AV 301 MIDLAND PARK AVE 410 N MILL ST #B11 ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 2267 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BIBBIG DIETER BIRACH KAREN BIRRFELDER BRIGITTE T 333 PARK AVE 122 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 3035 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-2414 ASPEN, CO 81612 BLOMQUIST JENIFER L&PERLEY PAUL BOLERJACK LISA BROOKS KERRI L PO BOX 12155 PO BOX 811 112 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 BROWN DONALD BROWN DOUGLAS&ABBY FAM TRUST BROWN RUTH H 412 KATHRYNS WY 11990 SAN VICENTE BLVD#200 410 N MILL ST#B11 ASPEN, CO 81611-2405 BRENTWOOD, CA 94513 ASPEN, CO 81611 BUCKLEY BETTY JEAN TRUST CALK LAURA E CANTRELL WESLEY R 364 W 3900 N WILLCOX DENNIS 104 KATHRYNS WY PROVO, UT 846044983 722 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611-2405 ASPEN, CO 81611-2472 CARLSON ERIC& LYNNE CASTLE CREEK HOLDINGS CO CAVE DERYK 24 HIDDEN BROOK DR PO BOX 56109 1195 E COOPER#B BARRINGTON, IL 60010 HOUSTON,TX 77256 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHAUNER RONALD M CHAZEN DAVID FRANKLIN II CITY OF ASPEN CHAUNER JACKIE L SHEFFER 150 E 58TH ST 27TH FL 130 S GALENA ST PO BOX 8782 NEW YORK, NY 10155 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 COERDT CLINTON CLAUSS CONANT RICHARD H CORBIN MARCIA A 326 MIDLAND AVE#201 55 SMUGGLER GROVE PO BOX 9312 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 CUNNINGHAM PAMELA M CURRAN MICHAEL FRANCIS DEELGUEA ALEJANDRO ORTIZ 502 MIDLAND PARK PL 2207 DEL MONTE PO BOX 9871 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON,TX 77019 ASPEN, CO 81612 DEJEAN FELIX A III&CAROLYNE DELYNN JEAN J DEVANNY EARL H III & ELIZABETH H 1368 KATHERINE DR C/O STOVROFF&TAYLOR TRAVEL 177 HAMBOLDT ST OPELOUSAS, LA 70570 1127 WEHRLE DENVER, CO 80218 BUFFALO, NY 14221 DODINGTON SUSAN M DOYLE JOHN F & LAURIE FRAMPTON DUNIGAN PATRICK A 221 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 12236 4245 N CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY STE 460 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS,TX 75205 ELA CHARLES S EPSTEN BRADFORD M QPR TRUST ERNST TERSIA V 1208 E HOPKINS 1030 W 66TH TERRACE 206 KATHRYNS WY ASPEN, CO 81611 KANSAS CITY, MO 64113 ASPEN, CO 81611-2405 FERLISI MARY SANDRA FLUG MARTIN FORNELL PETER J 326 MIDLAND AVE#307 616 E HYMAN AVE 402 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANZE MARTIN JOSEPH FUENTES DAVID & KATHARINE D GARTON SARA B 520 E COOPER AVE STE 210 302 MIDLAND PARK PL 110 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 816113824 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLEASON AMY GLICK DANIEL GOLDEN SALLIE EVERETTE JOHN PO BOX 9910 325 PARK AVE 712 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOODMAN DREW I GORBITZ HEIDI & PATRIC GREENHILL MICHAEL LOUIS TRUSTEE 5721 GREEN OAKS DR PO BOX 647 GREENHILL DEBRA MERLE TRUSTEE GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80121-1336 ASPEN, CO 81612 30 RIPARIAN RD HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035-1909 GRIFFITHS THOMAS W GROSZ COLLEEN A TRUST GRUBBS MATT 504 MIDLAND PARK PL 155 N HARBOR DR#3612 333 MIDLAND AVE#3 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60601 ASPEN, CO 81611-2412 GUGLIELMO KNANSEE L HACH STEPHEN C HAGEN CATHERINE ANNE 514 KATHRYNS WY 23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD 210 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HANSEN BETH HECK JAMES C HEMMING GREGG S & KAREN S PO BOX 1775 PO BOX 8416 311 MIDLAND AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 HERMELIN ASPEN LLC HEYMAN BRUCE QPR TRUST 50% HEYMAN VICKI QPR TRUST 50% 32205 BINGHAM RD PO BOX 5000 2035 N MAGNOLIA FRANKLIN, MI 48025 MS-10 CHICAGO, IL 60614 OGDENSBURG, NY 13669 HIGGINS PAUL HITCHCOCK SAMANTHA HOUBEN CYNTHIA MICHELE 303 MIDLAND PARK PL#C-3 PO BOX 329 PO BOX 9616 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 HTM PROPERTIES LLC HUMPHREY JESS IBARA RON 10200 STONE BRIAR PO BOX 1775 PO BOX 776 LAS VEGAS, NV 89144 ASPEN, CO 81612 CAYUCOS, CA 93430 JEFFERSON GREG JOHNSON SHAEL JOHNSTON PEGGY REVOCABLE TRUST 711 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 3549 111 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 K&W PROPERTIES I LLC KALTENBOCK ERNST KEARN ROBERT& ORENE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 744 1612 WOODBINE HEIGHTS BLVD 1831 WILLOW RD BLACKSBURG,VA 24060 TORONTO ONTARIO HILLSBOROUGH, CA 94010 CANADA M46 3A4, KNUTSON RODNEY D KOCH KATHRYN S &JOHN F KOLBERG JUDITH A PO BOX YY 304 MIDLAND PARK PL C-4 501 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LACROIX TIMOTHY LAFOUNTAINE ANTOINETTE LAUGHREN DAVID 113 MIDLAND PARK PL 410 KATHRYNS WY #D1 PO BOX 1265 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 LEE JONATHAN O TRUST LEE QUINCY J LEVENTHAL ROBERT B 35 FISHER AVE 610 W 5TH#600 515 KATHRYNS WY BROOKLINE, MA 02445 AUSTIN,TX 78701 ASPEN, CO 81611-2405 LEVIN AMY MACCRACKEN SCOTT R&MARISA POST MCDONALD FRANCIS B 811 MIDLAND PARK PL#H11 403 MIDLAND PARK PL#D3 PO BOX 4671 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 MCGAVOCK MARGARET MCPHEE JAMES MICHAEL&ANNE MARIE MCPHERSON GREGORY J ALBERT ELIZABETH A 401 MIDLAND PARK PL PO BOX 2073 PO BOX 533 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 MEBEL GREGORY E MG DUPLEX LLC MOHWINKEL CLIFF 30 KUPONO ST 825 W NORTH ST PO BOX 9457 PAIA, HI 967799723 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MOONEY TIMOTHY NEMIROW JORDAN NICHOLS SCOTT A PO BOX 8931 PO BOX 559 PO BOX 3035 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 OLDFIELD BARNEY F PAGEWOOD LLC PATTEN DAVID N 2701 MIDLAND AVE#8312 1301 MCKINNEY#3175 810 MIDLAND PARK PL GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 816014395 HOUSTON, TX 77010 ASPEN, CO 81611 PHILLIPS ARTHUR R& HELEN B PITKIN COUNTY REDMOND JOHN B & LYNN G PO BOX 8245 530 E MAIN ST#302 207 KATHRYNS WY#133 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 REYNOLDS LORA D ROCKY MTN PROPERTY LLC SAMUELSON ALIX 610 W 5TH#600 73 SMUGGLER GROVE RD PO BOX 4324 AUSTIN, TX 78701 ASPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 SCARLETT ROBIN SELINKO VERA L SEMPLE SASHA L 413 KATHRYNS WY 2207 DEL MONTE 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611-2405 HOUSTON,TX 77019 ASPEN, CO 81611 SIMMONS SUSAN SMITH DONALD NELSON SMITH JACK L& DIANE M 101 KATHRYNS WY 501 MIDLAND PARK PL 434 COTTONWOOD DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 EVERGREEN, CO 80439 SNELL NANCY L SNYDER CONDO ASSOC SPONAR ANTON K&JUDY PO BOX YY 600 KATHRYNS WAY 222 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-2486 STEAR RONALD A& MARIA F STEIN DEBORAH STOVROFF JOAN C 121 MIDLAND PARK PL#A21 710 MIDLAND PARK PL C/O STOVROFF&TAYLOR TRAVEL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 1127 WEHRLE BUFFALO, NY 14221 SWIFT LAWRENCE V TAYLOR JACQUELINE W TERKUN MARK DALY JACQUELINE A 1127 WEHRLE PO BOX 329 PO BOX 1313 BUFFALO, NY 14221 ASPEN, CO 81612 BASALT, CO 81621 VICENZI HEATHER L TRUST WEBSTER DAVID H WELDEN TODD E& DEBORAH C PO BOX 2238 PO BOX 10362 503 MIDLAND PARK PL#E3 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 WELLS SHARON ELIZABETH WHITE WILLIAM P WILSON KIMBERLY 338 MIDLAND AVEW 326 MIDLAND AVE#204 102 KATHRYNS WAY#A2 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 WINKLER JILL C 212 MIDLAND PARK PL ASPEN, CO 81611 Exhibit G ADDENDUM TO MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planning Technician MEETING DATE: July 15,2014 RE: 320 Midland Ave.—RDS Variance Request On July 10, 2014 the Mitch Haas submitted a minor change in plans related to the site design of the proposed residence at 320 Midland Ave. Drawings for these plans follow this summary. The issue remains unchanged in that the Applicant continues to seek a Residential Design Standard Variance from the standard associated with Build-to lines. The change in plans affects this review in the following way. • In the previous design the front fagade of the home was set back 50' from the property line. There was no portion of the front fagade that was within the Code required five feet of the front yard setback line. • The current design depicts approximately 26% of the front fayade (15') to be within five feet of the front yard setback line. • The Code standard requires 60% of the front fagade to be within 5' of the front yard setback line. RECOMMENDATION: Staff continues to recommend the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the request for a Residential Design Standard Variance at this location, finding the criteria for a variance to not be met, for the reasons outlined in the original memo. 1 MIDLAND AVENUE 10 A Egli a 120.37' r& N04 54 OOW _ —. •$ j 0 _ ___ --- • • s' �''s gy • ' • • B •---------- co a. r dI f 1� r• FI rn STOL --'-•-•-•-•- •a f � ! r r f C7 f 1r r ► � b p CAB rr? � � a' •� •5 f `( � i � � r f • • to t r i 11 i r Z f r � r � � d c3 f •*•• J41 •._._._._._� :: • •.�._._._._•v _ _N�. _._._._._._._._. ._ — -- -- -- • ------ --_—��_ - 0 28 oow� • 121.07' • ' ' ��� -P I OR 2 1 I p LOFT I i ! 1 IiAO, ! ! i OPEN TO SOAK ! eAn1, Ii � ! p I I I LLLLLL I j LL LLLL f Ii I L ! 1 LLLL L4& I 1 4 L1. L I 1 I i i I i ��aooP 1 es t UPPER IEV&PW1 HIM MWFU M LLC OAW PfiMMM PAN&N0.273AMO0001 LW I EAST IEADOI SIISDIN&ON 30 WOUND AW- ASM,00 1"611 0.2214 O S 10 Is 20 >="WMY 00 0 > ce>M 4.2 i I LU t W f i go ��I �m ,�� ..�,,.�,,.�,,,, Iii �.: i __-��� __ . .. ���._ i ■ i s - - - _ ■� �ifyill! �� �� `r. I� HAAS LAND PLANNING LLC April 17, 2014 Mr. Justin Barker, Planner JUL 1 0 2014 Aspen Community Development Department t � 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Residential Design Standards Variance Request for 320 Midland Avenue, Aspen (Lot 1,East Meadow Subdivision; Parcel ID 42737-181-06-001) Dear Justin: Please consider this letter and the accompanying plans and photos to constitute a formal request for approval of a variance from the Section 26.410.040(A)(2), "Build-to Lines," standard of the City of Aspen's Residential Design Standards (hereinafter"RDS") for the property located at 320 Midland Avenue, Aspen. This vacant property is on the northeast corner of Midland Avenue and Smuggler Grove Road, and it is zoned Moderate-Density Residential (R-15A). This application is submitted pursuant to Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards of the Aspen Land Use Code (the "Code") by HTM Properties, LLC, owner (hereinafter "applicant") of the subject property. Proof of the applicant's ownership is provided in Exhibit 1 hereto. The City's Land Use Application and Dimensional Requirements Forms are attached hereto as Exhibit 2. Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC, Walker Design Services, and Sherman & Howard, LLC to represent the applicant is attached as Exhibit 3. A Pre-Application Conference summary is attached as Exhibit 4, and an executed Agreement to Pay Application Fees is attached as Exhibit 5. The applicant's representatives have met with Community Development Department staff to discuss the proposed development. Based on these meetings and the plans presented, staff determined that, other than the one variance requested herein, compliance with all of the other applicable RDS contained in Section 26.410.040 of the Code has been sufficiently demonstrated (the property is outside of the "Aspen Infill Area"). Community Development Department staff has also determined that the "front" yard of the subject property with respect to setback requirements and the RDS is the Smuggler Grove Road frontage, not the Mascotte Lane (private road and "rear" yard) or the Midland Avenue (west "side" yard) frontages. Like Mascotte Lane, Smuggler Grove Road is also a private drive that basically functions as a shared driveway. Section 26.410.010(A) of the Code states that the purpose of the RDS, in general, is to preserve established neighborhood scale and character, and to ensure that Aspen's streets and neighborhoods are public places conducive to walking. The requested variance will • 420E. MAIN STREET, SUITE 10-B • ASPEN, COLORADO • 81 61 1 • PHONE: (970) 925-7819 • MITCH @HLPASPEN.COM April 17, 2014 320 Midland Avenue-RDS variance Page 2 in no way affect the preservation of the Smuggler Grove neighborhood scale or character or in any way make the area less conducive to walking. In fact, the subject lot is located on private road and there are no sidewalks at all in the area; pedestrians in this neighborhood must walk in the streets. To the extent that the neighborhood maintains any established pattern of scale and character, and to the extent that there are public places conducive to walking, these features exist only along Midland Avenue. Given the configuration of the lot, surrounding development patterns, and its location on a private (i.e., not public) road, the variance will have no affect at all on the neighborhood scale, character or streetscape. More specifically, and with regard to Variances from the City of Aspen's RDS, the Land Use Code provides at Section 26.410.020(D)(1)that an applicant, ...may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, if granted, would.- a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site- specific constraints. In the current case, while up to three (3) administrative variances may be requested, the applicant is requesting a variance from only one (1) of the RDS, namely: Site Design, Build-to Lines (26.410.040(A)(2)). The language of this standard is provided below in italicized text followed by a response demonstrating why the grant of an administrative variance is appropriate. A. Site Design. The intent of these design standards is to encourage residential buildings that address the street in a manner which creates a consistent `fagade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, where fences or dense landscaping exist or are proposed, it is intended that they be used to define the boundaries of private property without eliminating the visibility of the house and front yard from the street. 2. Build-to Lines. On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, at least sixty percent (60%) of the front fagade shall be within five (5)feet of the minimum front yard setback line. On corner sites, this standard shall be (PID 2737-981-06-001) April 17, 2014 320 Midland Avemte-RDS Variance Page 3 met on the frontage with the longest block length. Porches may be used to meet the sixty percent(60%) standard. A variance from the RDS requires demonstration of consistency with only one of the two above-cited standards of review. While it is felt that the primary justification for the requested variance falls under standard "a," there are also unusual site-specific constraints that should be considered. That is, the requested variance will maintain an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the physical context as well as the purpose of the build-to lines standard. Also, the desire to preserve as many healthy trees as possible on the property provides an unusual site-specific constraint under which fairness would dictate granting of the requested variance. To be clear, as written and codified, the two criteria under which a variance may be granted have nothing at all to do with whether compliance with the particular design standard can be achieved; thus, the fact that the subject parcel is a vacant lot should not be a consideration. When considering the context in which this development is proposed and the purpose of the Build-to Lines standard, the layout of the home depicted on the site plan provides an appropriate design and pattern of development. The context of the neighborhood in which the development is proposed is relatively haphazard. Immediately to the north and all property to the east of the East Meadow Subdivision (Smuggler Grove Road) is unincorporated Pitkin County lands that are not and will not anytime soon be subject to the RDS; in fact, these properties are subject to an entirely different set of regulations altogether. There are also several duplexes and multi-family structures in the immediate vicinity. The required front yard setback in the R-15A Zone District is twenty-five (25) feet. Therefore, the build-to lines standard requires that all homes in the Zone District maintain a front yard setback of between twenty-five and thirty feet (25'-30') for at least 60% of their front facade. All areas surrounding Smuggler Grove Road/East Meadow Subdivision maintain different zoning designations and, therefore, different front yard setback requirements. Accordingly, the only potential opportunity for obtaining a "consistent facade line" at some point in the future is along Smuggler Grove Road, but not throughout the surrounding neighborhood where minimum front yard setbacks are only ten (10) feet. Consequently, the only "context" truly worthy of consideration is the homes/properties fronting on Smuggler Grove Road. Including the subject lot,there are a total of eight (8) properties fronting on Smuggler Grove Road (see accompanying Context Map). There are seven lots on Smuggler Grove Road that are currently developed, but as the accompanying context map and photos show, the structures on these lots maintain no consistent building orientation, setback pattern or relationship to the street. The home on the lot immediately to the east (number "1" on the context map and photos) is not oriented parallel to the street as required by other RDS, and it has a front yard setback of approximately sixteen (16) feet, or 9'-14' forward of where the build-to-lines standard (PID 2737-181-06-001) April 17, 2014 320 Midland Avenue-RDS Variance Page 4 would require development on the subject property. The duplex structure on the next lot (numbered "2" on the context map and photos) to the east is also oriented in a manner that is not parallel to the street (but skewed in the direction opposite the structure on the intervening lot "1"), and this duplex structure's front fagade has a minimum front yard setback of approximately thirty-seven feet (37'), or 7'-12' back from where the build-to- lines standard would require development on the subject property. The next house to the east (numbered "3" on the context map and photos) maintains an approximately 24 foot front yard setback but no portion of the structure is oriented parallel to the street. The home at the dead end (numbered "4" on the context map and photos) has a front yard setback of approximately twelve(12) feet. The south side of the street is even more haphazard, with one of these three structures (numbered "5" on the context map and photos) hidden toward the rear of its lot and behind a gated drive. Similarly, the single-family house at the southeast corner of Smuggler Grove Road and Midland Avenue (numbered "7" on the context map and photos) looks like a multi-family structure and is fully oriented toward Midland Avenue (not Smuggler Grove); its setback from Smuggler Grove Road is approximately 5'-6'. In other words, the structures on Smuggler Grove Road do not at all address the street in a manner that creates any kind of consistent fagade line or at all defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, these properties are very much obscured by a combination of parking, fencing and landscaping such that visibility of the houses and front yard areas is limited, at best. Clearly, this neighborhood does not provide an opportunity to "address the street in a manner which creates a consistent fagade line'." Accordingly, granting of the requested will have no affect at all on the neighborhood scale, character or streetscape. In recognition of these circumstances and the fact that a wholesale redevelopment of the neighborhood cannot be expected during the lifespan of the proposed residence, the applicant has sensitively sought to "provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. " The applicant has accomplished this by addressing the spirit of the applicable RDS as a whole, and the build-to lines standard in particular, relative to the lot's Midland Avenue frontage. For instance, 100% of the fagade facing Midland Avenue will be developed parallel to the street and at the ten (10) foot setback line, which is consistent with front setbacks along Midland Avenue. The Midland Avenue fagade includes a one-story, front porch-like element/canopy that covers more than 50 square feet, a properly scaled (less than 8' tall) entrance that is less than 10 feet back from the front-most wall, and several principal windows, none of which span through the area between 9 and 12 feet above the finished first floor. This front porch canopy element also comprises more than 20% of the building's overall width along Midland Avenue, and no nonorthogonal windows are proposed. No lightwells will be located in front of this fagade either. Finally, vehicular access to the site will be from the private drive(Smuggler Grove Road), such that the single-stall garage will be side-loaded relative to Midland Avenue. (PID 7737-181-06-001) April 17, 2014 320 Midland Avenue-RDS Variance Page J Section 26.410.010(A) of the Code explains that, "Neighborhood character is largely established by the relationship between front facades of buildings and the streets they face. By orienting buildings parallel to the street and maintaining a certain consistency in front setback patterns, there is interaction between residents and passersby and the built environment." In addition, the same Code Section goes on to further explain that, "The area between the street and the front door of the home is a transition between the public realm of the neighborhood and the private life of a dwelling...it is important not to close off views of the front lawn and house." The opportunity for achieving these goals/purposes of the RDS standards exists in far greater magnitude along Midland Avenue than it does along Smuggler Grove Road. Nevertheless, the proposed design complies with the letter of all of the applicable RIDS other than the build-to lines requirement relative to Smuggler Grove Road, which is a private, dead end drive with haphazard development patterns and no pedestrian facilities. Homes along Smuggler Grove Road are randomly setback behind private, head-in parking areas, fences and landscaping, making the semi-public realms difficult to see and virtually nonexistent in many cases. Midland Avenue, by contrast, is a highly used, public collector street with relatively consistent facade lines. The proposed design addresses the purposes of not only the build-to lines standard, but also the purposes of all of the applicable RDS relative to the lot's Midland Avenue frontage. Consequently, the applicant has provided "an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. " Finally, one of the applicant's primary goals in developing the subject property is to maintain as many of the healthy trees as possible. The density of existing trees that can be maintained within 30 feet of the front property line provides an unusual site-specific constraint under which fairness would dictate granting of the requested variance. That is, there are at least 10 existing trees between 25 and 30 feet from the front property line (i.e., where 60% of the front facade would need to be located to comply with the standard), and another 5-7 significant trees are in the area between this zone and the proposed front facade of the house. While not all of these 10-17 trees are in perfect health, many of them are worthy of saving but would all have to be eliminated to provide compliance with the build-to line standard. Forcing elimination of all of these trees would seem a pointless shame not only for the applicant but also for the neighbors, especially in light of the context and severely limited opportunity to achieve a consistent facade line along Smuggler Grove Road anyway, as described above. In summary, the proposed development complies with the spirit and the intent of the RDS. It complies with the letter of all but one of the applicable RDS. The foregoing narrative, coupled with the accompanying plans and photos, demonstrates that the limited extent of the requested variance is justified by the context in which the development is proposed, constraints specific to the site, and the proposed design's continued ability to (PID 2737-981-06-009) April 17, 2014 320 Midland Avenare-RDS Variance Page 6 promote the purpose of the standards, particularly along the more public and more important Midland Avenue frontage. As such, it is respectfully requested that the Community Development Director administratively approve the variance by signing on the space provided on the following page. If you should have any questions, or if I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, Haas Land Planning,LLC Jl` Mitch Haas Owner/Manager cc: Bob Walker, Walker Design Services Exhibits: 1. Proof of Ownership 2. Land Use Application and Dimensional Requirements Form 3. Authorization Letter 4. Pre-Application Conference Summary 5. Fee Agreement Attachments: • Existing conditions survey(2 sheets) • Proposed Site and Floor Plans (3 sheets) • Graphic 3-D massing model (3 sheets) • Context Map and Aerial Photo (2 sheets) • Lot and Neighborhood Context Photos(10 sheets) Signed and Approved: Date: Chris Bendon, City of Aspen Community Development Director (PrD 7737-181-06-001) EN I 17 tr i 1 I � I i � 1 1 i I ti } ND NO.4 — _`- j / LM6129 2GY ASPHALT ROAD v MASC♦\ � ENE Fi - I %f AR 00,Q MOW LATC 0'U71U APM Sa PAS 99 --EDGE OF \\ r, i 8!5'9 X86 I ————— r �'� •yy j 3 ASPHALT ROAD i —low y \�\ _j x ELEON�CON�TEEPPPAD� NO PARKING 6 g .7 11.0 Ulluly I Iy I ` 12 11 I t..� LOT I eoacASEMENT sG I i+ �J 9,849 SQ.FT. I � 4 y _ 1�t 16. 17 115 .: } ', ` :;,1 I 1 i s' X191 20• ,I 4. i I w• I EXISTING �• FENCE GIf 24 25 28'.27 I N x 28 V NO PARIOt1' fr r 31.. t stagy i 49 r�1�\ 11 '37. %;�, 32 4 FOUND/5 R t } ! 5b / 38 , x 47.1 \ 4 I i 48 461 �4 1 / 3:9 3 I t i MuLe ; C ,�y °41'00 / qp 94 <' } 1 R I STOP SIGN OSNOWPWII� j 79.00,� AREA ! �N OF ///��� � ! NO 05 FMMMAR EDGE t`� t I SPHALT ROUT Si�U`.,•�r �R GROVe PER'*MATE ROADWAY ROAD PER BOOK T-P s I , I -- _ •u6uo1."ME ---- ----- -- AA AWM M 41611 587'J7'40'E 361.58'— I 13.14 (BASIS CF BEARINGS) —Q I 1SIN BENCH t I o 6 10 16 I SW CORNER(IF EAST J MEADOW SUBDINSION FOUND — SE CORNER OF EAST AR AND t 1/2• ■1 F MEADOW R OF E ON I CAP.LS gBLE FOUND ALUMINUM CAP ELEYA110N:7953 28 — LS W EgBLE r • APR 0 3 2014 I 1 i Is m lD° z2g� �3 N $cis I 1 LOT 1, EAST MEADOW SUB®UVMI®N AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 99 �_rcd8 �'ozpz CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PIMN, STATE OF COLORADO r1 - 9u^ 111 jj' z jm o I: I FOUND ND k )/' - - -_._---- C:• ... L REBAR k CAP T t EDC[OFr++ I ` ---_ m - I rNB43B'E 20F , JSPHALT ROAD - I 4A ✓, ,a�1 it��_��ci:'i'ti�+ ty,.�.T.1 4 A k�,: , _ FOUND NO.4 REBAR -- N C •5..' Sa P ¢.! 10,0' "• ..-, 4!f 4 YELLOW PLASTIC S 1 1 ",eq:''`• �� _��.�� //-EgSE/ r OAP MARKED LSI6I29 W PAGE sa 'l '��``h t yl'1..:�• Y� D1" • F�� ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 7954' , - i - a' I ��lr. ��- '• - j x ON CONCRETE PaD TREE CHART .. I 'm TYPE SIZE 13RIP r _ d t: f T..:'. I :..�'`)•1L I DECIDUOUS 4• 7T 0' No PARKING SICN• - {+ "T� v,l Z DECIDUOUS 11• 22' t 1 0 ••'•: .1IIII!`3,�.7'.'f L'�- .1:! g CONIFEROUS 4• 8• Q �'''S'•' -s 4 DECIDUOUS 8' ' I T Jf\ ••r' �� ��,� „^�. /,I 5 DECIDUOUS 13• 26' O 6 DECIDUOUS 3' 6' .I 7 DECIDUOUS 72' 24' 2 J';, •�1 s oec�DUas I st 9 oEdouous 9 is _'.1. 2 ' tC OA.I_ ,t,�„ t `.t. 10 DECIDUOUS 3 6' U' la:::_1,.. / •( X- +4 '}• 11 DECIDUOUS 6• 12 IJ `e' r 13 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' a.s: .} 4 ""� '°y. 14 DECIDUOUS 6• 72. L A 111ff 15 DECIDUOUS 4 8' a N LO I. 1 ' J 'fa 't 12 S• S 16 DEgD0005 4• B' bI 18 occgDDUUays z ie GRAPHIC SCALE c ^ ( ) r \� _ / 'I •_a.., r r'%Z' 20 DECIDUOUS 6• 12 A ®� r� I 21 DECIDUOUS 11 22• !d I Ij=, 6.0'UTILITY 22 DEdDUWS 9' IB' ' J-., I�'• ) 'r, I EASEMENT ( - i o I 90p(3,PAGE 99 24 DECIDUOUS 8' ,g (IN�) I - ril C3'',®49 S/'� 'may „ 10 * _.I...'., 1 / Q.lf-11. I /C 26 DECIDUOUS 8' 15 1 fmh l0 ft. DECIDUOUS a ,s' :� �_'"'\�•`- ) 1;:•-'-.- b 27 DEGDUBUS 9 18 � r 'I ` Ati•: `="- 'r.l: ' r � a �" 2s DECIDUOUS 1s• LEGEND 'a r ; .I i L l ":`�.,• ?,� f,� •s;i A yp� g'JA pA•- 't"' 29 DECIDUOUS 13 26 &I .�{ i'X I .^ _ !+ /c�`�A��R fwu- 30 DECIDUOUS 10 28 ^ �'- - ' 1• pG WATER VALVE �¢ woe DECIDUOUS s• 8' F.U 1 � ��. � �:: `Y• •J - t�•t}}'L -, J• �'�mkt 32 DECIDUOUS s• lo' O1 11, K � �t``'` 5 rld'_ •• _„(' 33 DECIDUOUS S' 12 [�°,f GAS LINE MARKER 34 oeaououS 5 1 Fi ¢ C9 35 DE.WOUS 4' 8' z 11° Zw { 1 f ! i/i ,h°Sj- n 1" C•....,7 �O POWER POLE z DECIDUOUS 1B• w_Imp [11 J - ' �V�%` �t �•.l`1�, �. _.�, _� Ji, 37 DECIDUOUS 8• 18 ® TELEPHONE PEDESTAL G�rp V .I A '_ /•' \, Y•. -pff�`ctR 'r Sg DECIDUOUS p�}a, 1yDy�[[((ICI g Q -.1 "�.:�.•,..� _.[ `�. 1'`> '� 'L.. 39 DECIDUOUS 7' 14 Q� ^-` %�` `� '�",.r'" -EIUSTiNG ID DEpDUOUS 3• 6 I '�•• ( j _ _`_.;'- +7..� •�i � `1,A¢'rA f�. I FENCE 41 DECIDUOUS 4 e' W I i 1 i o ff &fig , a2 oEaouous 6 za 1` IN LV 43 DECIDUOUS 1Y J j t R y `�I ••_\ d:•.) �k' S N ::.c::. '. :w.A,4( I, t ✓:.• 44 DEgOUGUS 5 10' DECIDUOUS 0 P:'; 4, ''/` • 46 DECIDUOUS z i �;a,1�, `- '�,, Y��z-, ,,�' 1 .�'p' ,! C`�,3 , �r .,'s..rk�, 4- e• { "`,, f >�"�• I k b 47 DECIDUOUS a• 8' 1 ,i •t �,`"; v�' �i ;�li Fr ...• _ /, r I_ i 0. I � � r 48 DECIDUOUS 11 22' f r 4V_ ' 1`,�J '"<7�2• I 49 DECIDUOUS 15_ ] y I alp Yi:. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 50 DECIDUOUS 'PRKIN _ x_ 1 '' 76' �� ': y T k' �• ``,. 73"' +,tl(,, oEGD0005 12 LOT 1,EAST MEADOW SUBDIVISION,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED JULY 26,,966 1! A } :. '' 1 4_ E ''.tt3! •: `,Y, � 53 DEUDUOUS IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PACE 99.SAID SUBDIVISION BEINC IN am. �c, ry` 54 DECIDUOUS 6' 74 SOUTH,RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, C110N TB,TOWNSHIP 10 OEdOUOUS 6' IT �' \�,.:.-T- s., .YI ",. t / ,.�s'/•:t-9 �'..:. ' S6 OEpDUOUS 5' 10' DECIDUOUS 43'13 40' NOTES: Jl�is...� A - I-= ,� L?` ,."'7��� ,' S9 BEGDUOU4 36' 36' • t 480 1 I � J 1$ z / / y i I� rJH s so DECIDUOUS 1Y z4 4 ' K -if x hA `xfA l 61 DECIDUOUS 3 g• BASS BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF 567'3748"E BETWEEN THE } SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST MEADOW SUBDIVISION q REBAR 111TH 1-1/21 gLDMINUM ` Y �„ 62 OEd0UOU5 3 g' CAP(LS ILLEGIBLE)AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF T EAST MEADOW SUBDIVISION AN t STC1P 51 .rEh >n ✓' '- /i 4t 9' 68 ALUMINUM CAP(LS ILLEGIBLE)IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. APPROXIMATE I- 2 THE DATE OF THIS TOPOGRPAHIC SURVEY WAS FEBRUARY 4,1014. SNOW PLOWED I 79,�r 65 DEGOUOVS 9• 18' B6 DECIDUOUS 12 24 �a AREA ` 67 DECIDUOUS 4• 8 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THE FIELD SURVEY WERE U.S SURVEY FEET. I P, 1���ILLI Y•'1 - L --_- _ 4. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS.RESTRICTIONS,COYEN,WTS ANp EASEMENTS U '+ --- _ OF RECORD,OR IN PLACE AND RESERVATI S.TTLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENTS GS PREPARED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES,COMMITMENT NO.0704107-C,EFFECTIVE OUND g5 RFPAR DATE PREPARED TIT E CO o ,ryy2t 4+ .�YYrJ 5. THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY IS BASED ON THE EAST MEADOW SUBDN50N PLAT RECORDED } 2r. y�o`f (DICE OF �A�j p : �Iy JUNE 2B,1966 W PLAT BOOK 3 AT PACE 99,EAST MEADOW AND JUKATI ANNEXATION O-Z '•� 1 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 28,1987 IN BOOK 2D AT PAGE 5 AS RECEPTION NO.292583,AN W W (l U) Et: ALT'ROAp � IMPROVEMENT SURVEY RECORDED JANUARY 14.2008 AT RECEPTION N0.545845 AND O D- y I ( T - (�p� ■))) CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN. m N V 7 �Y•A..f 1 3d ��� �j 7 Q l O 2 R�H�hM Q LL i W I L 1 t 6WK22dkPAGE Z9 S 0 O I ✓ ��»ar f SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT O t ( IL L —err __ _ _ __ 1• - 1,FRANK W.HARRINGTON,DO HEREBY STATE THAT TMS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS PREPARED ex BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING,INC.FOR TODD DuBOEF,THAT SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY [� 7A�-- WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISK M AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT 15 — (BASIS OF BEARINGS) v"�s� t -' ---'--/ - TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MT BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. 1 I �_rm BENCH MARK _ *• !! F^.- SW CORNER OF EAST _ CE 4 1 MEADOW SUBDIVISION FOUND J /S REBTI AND 1 1/2' _ SE CORNER OF EAST e1 1 1 ALUMINUM CAP,LS JUMBLE � MEADOW SUBDIVISION Imo ry f EIEVAl10N:785128 FOUND ALUMINUM CAP gY LS ILLEGIBLE f -'I MANN W.HARRING N0.1 g � 'CP,oas \ PROJECT NO. 2141610 onLa: Acroaowc m EQOAMiO uW Wu Nusi mnrtnx ANY Iccrx IL116V BAyY UPPI WT YFIECi M n45 AlRTEY RIIW 11RkE YF4R4 ... 4FT01 l0U FlRSi 96COYTA SUW c[tECT, M RO EWNT YM 4RYµTM ... eAS1n YrAV Rxr Duet}x Txo Sumer RE eMYO.Lm YaI¢nuN m+ rE,ua mLU nIL DATE ar CFRNx4110N swror NEAFM I OF I m a� �������� MIDLAND AVENUE 2 120.37' x N04 _______ • _ —.—.—. ( ----� • • • j • SETBACK YE • t • • j I • 1 1 1 1 ' �r � �� jf • � i x4 1 . r i � � AO ii I i s• ' .� e r i I i i -- � sTOrs. i o Ot s,oa a 0 or ! i ! • s. � .� j i ! • • 1 US Sig' r 1 I f • i m of f i� i �l•st 1 I i • .--------—--------------------------_ ____— ----P-----P i •r" • • 0 • 0Z 0 w SETBACK i V) j • • �'e • • 1 C7 1 y • • • • • .s • �� ,s NOD 28 DOW 121.07' • • • ® 1• -- ------ --- -------------------- —._________--__--__—___. .—.—•------—._._.—..........--.T. a 1 •s j • __� j � ( j f j �••V ,� x j�� 'f j � j It fit •S 1 CLOSET � ,x y• l � i i j i r j •� f ; ( i j •� oil oil i is g, I �x j s1on. air f I L CLOSET it Q f I r j �+ I •a ---------------J j! it 4:(n N• Of • f HOS oc gt ot 9 0 119LO 00'N3dSV OW4M OCT 3DW3OM3W ADWO W-W LKFMYB RE: IL i I TER 'FE- Tm FE- ol mm Piticin County Parcel Viewer Page 1 of 1 11 41 , - 4�'r , i r • , O 1 �SiTE L. \ O t -1 P T Esi,DeLorme,HERE,Intermap,PC,TomTom,USGS,USDA,EPA I AspenPiWnGIS i AspenPitkin GIS http://aspenpitkin.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Solutions/s2.htinl?appid=bl3bl7d640eO4f9fa751953dedea9e6f 3/21/2014 w �4 r� �r r i IWO r A H Ol a i w� s • w �.. ` ix Oil oH. e, Aspen, CO 816.1USA T ' rl lilt a a y t �' _tea �~ � TM-� -_ ••, � � .�,� � �., ., Goo 1c4 eart Z 2013,,Googie 11 • 'S ko ;T.9 w j j RM�1y"aaj�!� � • _4 e►^-. ...-j:c', y.F+e"[gH,it-��,r.��w,,.�,f7t1'*, �,�111�.:'Y1' '+K'9t'�Y+' .. +� I tom'.: '� , � ww•, � .mss• � � ~Yy tt .GIs• a "',�' w_ _ ._, F .? e. k rw � •'. `� `, _ �.,' „� qYi ,�I� r ���' v° 'rd's' tic' � i� r•k •• .4 .n F ,µl=l�t�' .k"j�� � �1t +� e''ti 4 �I fie. .f.�r 1 'cam • Y;r,. ��f� f +` "�4. 1 L� � - .,� '�_ f , Say 1 .', i¢w• MMILI, i�'•'f '� tw air Y. A ` 1`. r },�-p., ''* "+r te" ,rn t', '. •'' w .. �, "A+ '- R ♦ t4 '^.`. t�l .;;r �� •'Y 1 .i ce M 1+'' ,A Al Jr vlew,yam •. � ��', P./t�� � 1 r �''- > r � �'• es'� - fir. 1�.. �' t f,w j tti� � - Y• ' N- { F r r r• P yw' e ar A �. 1qt. .new* f. AW � s Rig L LLi. ' t �. ft. ul 'l I �"+• .P '."°IP' Rr�., 1i� ��'� ., r,' �1 :jet; !t :i a�v5am S F r. d P' _ izi w+nx lY,�t � 44t el I ;• � � � � P#� e ` �tit k` � - s. + y. .� t.� , tt id L Y�yt'' .+ :'41►�A1Mnt ta.'a'1F'. y-.. t... �' -. -. � r�j a•;� ti It - � J'r Y r t c _ � ' ± ' n , f d: ys T F r „ � r F fs T 4 l\ vN,/::AIESI,f�M�. lKa:iGF.IwF'U+1' a4'R+'. • �/#A' �C !f ��ry E'14, boo PA ..tO ,,.,_,..} • ' 15 kv c '., ,;� '' .� :r 'fir �TM ,•• � � '� s+ ri +� :} �a • , y ' �. -49 A�. r' ti F '.Y q irk ' `t .y lk A. R' a } va 1 i 1 N 4 • Fµa w f • ,k s W*{ ,A uu f tt ;. f' 1 ;. ' WAM awn i i ! 1 -_z y N f.� ' 1 :.5 �e J , 1 1 T ' ' • ' -:�°;J AiA .rte i ' X 40 ry "^ AlatlGr e"M�II� "PIM& i r• 4 Y f `f AM wl �*..�•. Xis. 8 a T n � W_ tt le ww r .,1 �.a .. 'M V� �• 1 1- ro,i �: � e� 4�ctl.- `x•;- .. ^.1 .. a •. a "yam t_„, ��'r�.•'s i fi.'.1�t '� 1 ,�y�"s X".- �7✓ •+raw_ _.. i �+..�� f+�,-.awl�. \ e•+ , •_-+-^•.,�.,`=y,� ( ,. ' r • r„, 4 i — f rice MIN Sal ^ WI �d } • J a a .ors ANN— Ott A FL , _ rAww r Y 1 w f •�� � *�,� 'mow �, �I . � nx"M ► ,wa W ��a��, t.:t ei i !IiR .. J.. s . .-Y .r�,�Y . `•� 'F "�,'�� _ T `Stl4 �l�11 ICA& .I'&- a :s � ti' :•��;� a K�� - �F � t�+ �s.w r « P.-._r � , kay's- .wR." w r?i.!' ifn• 2t«.�' Y'., 5 ;.n..J rL ✓, r .' r�..�itN.., +� ti' ! ft.5 to r mom V !K•' •�ck � y' M. s � Yryx- w s } • r� "w tru.. _ j ; -' .•Y�1�4 Lam. lq? � � a'�;� - �` yr ��\• r wMN" � •' eT • ` � �• 5, � �•� � � 1 1ga ,y" r• i ��� s 4C woy; r R. r byj'?t„dF ' S t .5 h F - eAa t1}M , a -e. -r V - �, w . • p ttTT'rr 1 ✓l.y � F �t ` .`r:...: F . if st r �s ,��rg• 'C t yi! A �7r�.+ i � „- .. *, •f +{f �t h �'+., er{y�r Po• 1 # tw, ys -r yy '�,nr fM ry i 7M � - d st a f ALA. T ar f k v w 4. mlimm �e F:. MWIW W-6,50 WON P S sa JS fi'' so 7 ry:�ar c M Wr' 11 b 1 _ .A� • '���5ry Vii.,.. ��k :'i��T -:i�!. 'fir. � .J"i Mt{ ,•r�� r• fi 1 #KI►'.s" r +rw e--.ref-r►+e=►.e t',,, .�` � ~..✓.AWN' ' d Sr• f. e , F vow • o` , _ 'I ",,.yam i`�+MLi rp` k P" �� •�� -•u h' '��, �,...•�� �� . .t }�.-':Y _ sec is � jv 41 v.::.G .,� ti 's ' MR At IL lop- w Op NMI TV xwk 14A j : • � r .. � rY r r� yw. Ise ,,�. ♦ •� - I �yZ31i. f~ �� � k• tik ' 'y J .T .,,,� ."� -'^e'�!IMFa '�.}�.r„ k""a Fk.a.�•.. +�+�';.. .�`-err '� j F 1 . Y i � 1 Pitkin County Parcel Viewer Page 1 of 1 Tv r 9 ` ya . 4— NI rdm _ ll j s DeLomie,HERE,IMemwp,IPC,TomTom HSBA, CIS AspenMin Ci RECEIVED 17 2014 crrY of ASPEN �oMMUNITY OMLOpKNT http://aspenpitkin.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Solutions/s2.html?appid=b13b17d64OeO4f9fa751953dedea9e6f 3/21/2014 - K i 1 BS . s r 4P 4W s i i+i '. ._. VOW r �+ w r a - n Y � r - w e, Aspen. CO 8161'1 ..USA s,;j 4 +:.� , * .a .. ♦ +ice �� F a' 1p r , w 4 • 4- A-� 'We Apo • � ,; yr; :..k�� } �„1. � O : �- �� � s..Gooste, eartl its ®2013 Googie Ask x irr - � `� ter;” • i � 1 ' 1' hzt 4 �•.N t°'.\�- iS � � .. �� -, � Jam• � �w�' � � `n ta5 L h aFrnr 70e?.'Mitrtlp •yrs, � - „« � „L�C.'1 _r - -Orr I'. • :1. 1 i. r tai", , A�« ,2 Ma lw � �_+ 6s 'Tf r• • - - ' !�f�- art.• �L°F.�fi'±� :�i`��,,,x;;�. �7I1�1i1. - ia�.r,. tF . ,*yam. � � �'-�i"_ *��A'����'+�',�'w•' � '—' e• y ,r - toy- 1{••;,rra-1�'a16,,. •�« .'wY..i.. ! ... 0.l T#F- Ln{(�7 L y t a : ti +Rye *r ,f�'• 'y � * � r q, rr. i • . F , ..eS r 1 N'�c. w'rn... .via... - ,:� - � �•. - Y r r w i I r i .hl f °■ Jow IF I IA MTN i ! _ x .r y ''M s Ve 40 if `_ " �� .9 •` _ '� '� ` _.may ^Y- .` _ - w S r. < 'L,` .I 16r-, *,soft , OP bib x r . n F a Sell ° A A 7- t i r ± ' 7r t t , , • � • ��. ^fi% N . _,s -a: +''� ) @ ` o- '�le,1, >.� 1�+..a � 'K:,."r�' f�'v� V�,c Ip 7. 41 IR A -at-I ^e_ r ' tip f , r ar .r BZ AL Wy- ltww n 4 ' f t• ' L J. a n 3p *Irk, o � a��` !�'`�"r'•�,0� a. ' is ,.t., .,ti.r. - ,. ..,, _ i x, i � x a C � _ fi b r � - r ' Awl - All IVIOL c-+J'v dNly A 17 2014 Mp►R 1 6 2414 CITY OFASPEN 6 �.r EI.N- ����.�••rs•� .c n Vw t� w r ow' r As as ' � W + 'r �1 �1r r y .b , k i v r � (P �P f•i {m w r>� rg 1 P v w. • � ag, � E I I too I I Ail i% � � his a �� '' • � Ir � /� ��111� 1!1' ' ��� I -+ � 1101 b �) ON Ge SO j� low- pr I to them I ca Noe e. • �1 w ab`y r' E 1 ` • • . ., � fi i y t. 1'� `- ;'� � f � f � �JR`-•• -11.1 ♦ � it T �l _ �� +..�' •� � '�r r '1 � � �Lq•,'f :'.'t�'_ ; it � ' �• . ,� -�� FFFIIIIII "I4RR"NNss - +• �+�� � i Y 1 fi,le so ca MM g, „`,� ��-" � wi .� •apt- '�''� � ,�,ti: r'�° � g M1.. » 9y` q ,.' Ir, biialwo "max--a° AA tA o Y S z. a N. } + j_ �"�R• 4V,P .?�' ;(a -�:r�P� ..'A{iV'''�i�JJ., v y �' �� - �� ��'. .,...._.-..i...-�w�.+n.mm,rn e,+r.•w.rrr+s _ .. ,.. .. � ! j � -SIY - . �• _. �. I + w ��r� � _ .v: a .. -,. . a ` �� ,ire' '!•'•,� • � 'r�'�lller'yI�.F.,.+..pbprcv.• `' �'� - �.«..- y , . - ... _..,+Y'n, .teeR'G" �Tfi5 �� 'ri.t?k+ey✓a;' '. Z` - Fa .$° . g � b e - + _;:� - � fW 1.': . r � ,R t, •'n' �. ,/. :+6 �. f Pe,.Yx .;Yn ..`Yn•. F, *,'�drwi slJllln A s .Mn,...� s ' XIN Fg'y yy�� r iA��E` <rF + f� ._:+. Na'h., :•a... L . ;: ..� "' ������:. x'.15.:' ..} r r WaA V4 J sw F as-,' Ir t. p • + a 10, ofy a ' Y _ r awl ..fie . -. Y m. e n IFA TOM I *owl aft ApMald 1 i a4. o x .i4 �j � a s f D4 MASCOTTE LANE ! z)67 30 DOE 88.00' ! • 0 2• o e "C I 1 a7ao, • �0 • ] •°1• I I "a� I • Z I I i ui GARAGE ON Coma o I • j P01EA _ i • I ! J I • i. ; � _ � 10 D ^ I I! I ] I 1) ! STORE C:5 j Oil 1.2 • • I uN1e . of • ® • • of • ! 3 ENTRY I ] � i I • m j i I 1e 1 j FONT roRa I n ' I ! • • I NEW PEE TREE ❑ 21 12 20•'.. 2 j • 37 v I• II ] I • 24 25 j - ss -' -� I • � i 7unF aneEwAr SE 1eAC 9 I r I I I ] 1 C3 `§—_-- CD rAn 1cti[E PLAH H1Y PROPOMM I1.0/Dd60EF MM04CE 220 NxAIO AWL ASF471,GO a78N 8.1.14 0 8 10 18 2D p. FAR MAIN LEAL MM SF UPM IEVM 1930 SF GARAGE 353—(230x125)-430 SF [1 24J' .3-713 154•.10.17'-1" 715 M71 6038.1880-74 SF 2AS SF 0 43 30 •___J • 48 • 37 • 47 x 48 4: 44 NEW PEE TREE • 3 — 42 • V • 34 N79 47 .0ow SMUGGLER GROVE ROAD 31 xi SCH-1 WALKER DESIGN SERVICES 970-379-3636 s I _ i ! OR 2 O� ! ! i d I I ON ! I I MBATM I I of OPEN M mar i 1 I j I I ol I I l { w�fi00F I I ! 09 t ! ! i OR 1 I 1 I I O N6AIN i ! ! i I I { I i j I { ! I j I ! { I I f i UPPER LEAl PVn HN PROPOIES UC/UAKU REWDKE 320 VIOLIN AWL ASPEI,GD OfMI 6.1.11 0 S 10 1S 20 1/id-i'-0' SCH-2 WALKER DESIGN SERVICES 970-379-3636 i 9Af-staocs sIDMnc aasia ecrmw ,o-,L<AV1 —H O S 9d s, 9L 9 0 ,rr9 11919 oo•N3d$V i 'my a+rian 9Lf 3N130b3tl i309��T1=01.Jtld NLH W,W 1N KRM TM (AMI W 9 1B i t wre I � i i i i z Y9 i i i ! ,a lNOWY, , end s� i L 1 l._ i i f 1 1 � JUN 1 8 2014 -- - - - - -- -- -,tea= - -- - - - - - - - - IIII 1- I l I � � I � I Li � I I JUN 18 2014 Vi , HAAS LVAND PLANN G , LLC RECEIVED APR 17 2014 April 17, 2014 CITY OF ASPEN Mr. Justin Barker, Planner COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Residential Design Standards Variance Request for 320 Midland Avenue, Aspen (Lot 1,East Meadow Subdivision; Parcel ID #2737-181-06-001) Dear Justin: Please consider this letter and the accompanying plans and photos to constitute a formal request for approval of a variance from the Section 26.410.040(A)(2), "Build-to Lines," standard of the City of Aspen's Residential Design Standards (hereinafter "RDS") for the property located at 320 Midland Avenue, Aspen. This vacant property is on the northeast corner of Midland Avenue and Smuggler Grove Road, and it is zoned Moderate-Density Residential (R-15A). This application is submitted pursuant to Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards of the Aspen Land Use Code (the "Code") by HTM Properties, LLC, owner (hereinafter "applicant") of the subject property. Proof of the applicant's ownership is provided in Exhibit 1 hereto. The City's Land Use Application and Dimensional Requirements Forms are attached hereto as Exhibit 2. Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC, Walker Design Services, and Sherman & Howard, LLC to represent the applicant is attached as Exhibit 3. A Pre-Application Conference summary is attached as Exhibit 4, and an executed Agreement to Pay Application Fees is attached as Exhibit 5. The applicant's representatives have met with Community Development Department staff to discuss the proposed development. Based on these meetings and the plans presented, staff determined that, other than the one variance requested herein, compliance with all of the other applicable RDS contained in Section 26.410.040 of the Code has been sufficiently demonstrated (the property is outside of the "Aspen Infill Area"). Community Development Department staff has also determined that the "front" yard of the subject property with respect to setback requirements and the RDS is the Smuggler Grove Road frontage, not the Mascotte Lane (private road and "rear" yard) or the Midland Avenue (west "side" yard) frontages. Like Mascotte Lane, Smuggler Grove Road is also a private drive that basically functions as a shared driveway. Section 26.410.010(A) of the Code states that the purpose of the RDS, in general,is to preserve established neighborhood scale and character, and to ensure that Aspen's streets and neighborhoods are public places conducive to walking. The requested variance will • 420 E. MAIN STREET, SUITE 10-B ASPEN, COLORADO • 8161 1 • PHONE: (970) 925-7819 MITCH @HLPASPEN.COM April 17, 2014 320 Midland Avenue -RDS Variance Page 2 in no way affect the preservation of the Smuggler Grove neighborhood scale or character or in any way make the area less conducive to walking. In fact, the subject lot is located on private road and there are no sidewalks at all in the area; pedestrians in this neighborhood must walk in the streets. To the extent that the neighborhood maintains any established pattern of scale and character, and to the extent that there are public places conducive to walking, these features exist only along Midland Avenue. Given the configuration of the lot, surrounding development patterns, and its location on a private (i.e., not public) road, the variance will have no affect at all on the neighborhood scale, character or streetscape. More specifically, and with regard to Variances from the City of Aspen's RDS, the Land Use Code provides at Section 26.410.020(D)(1) that an applicant, ...may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, if granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site- specific constraints. In the current case, while up to three (3) administrative variances may be requested, the applicant is requesting a variance from only one (1) of the RDS, namely: Site Design, Build-to Lines (26.410.040(A)(2)). The language of this standard is provided below in italicized text followed by a response demonstrating why the grant of an administrative variance is appropriate. A. Site Design. The intent of these design standards is to encourage residential buildings that address the street in a manner which creates a consistent `fagade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, where fences or dense landscaping exist or are proposed, it is intended that they be used to define the boundaries of private property without eliminating the visibility of the house and front yard from the street. 2. Build-to Lines. On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, at least sixty percent (60%) of the front fagade shall be within five (5)feet of the minimum front yard setback line. On corner sites, this standard shall be (PID 2737-181-06-001) 0 • April 17, 2014 RECEIVED 320 Midland Avenue -RDS Variance Page 3 APR 17 ?n'd met on the ftontage with the longest block length. Porches may b CITY OF AbPtN the sixty per ent(60%) standard. g y � 1A FkLOPWT A variance from the RDS requires demonstration of consistency with only one of the two above-cited standards of review. While it is felt that the primary justification for the requested variance falls under standard "a," there are also unusual site-specific constraints that should be considered. That is, the requested variance will maintain an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the physical context as well as the purpose of the build-to lines standard. Also, the desire to preserve as many healthy trees as possible on the property provides an unusual site-specific constraint under which fairness would dictate granting of the requested variance. To be clear, as written and codified, the two criteria under which a variance may be granted have nothing at all to do with whether compliance with the particular design standard can be achieved; thus, the fact that the subject parcel is a vacant lot should not be a consideration. When considering the context in which this development is proposed and the purpose of the Build-to Lines standard, the layout of the home depicted on the site plan provides an appropriate design and pattern of development. The context of the neighborhood in which the development is proposed is relatively haphazard. Immediately to the north and all property to the east of the East Meadow Subdivision (Smuggler Grove Road) is unincorporated Pitkin County lands that are not and will not anytime soon be subject to the RDS; in fact, these properties are subject to an entirely different set of regulations altogether. There are also several duplexes and multi-family structures in the immediate vicinity. The required front yard setback in the R-15A Zone District is twenty-five (25) feet. Therefore,the build-to lines standard requires that all homes in the Zone District maintain a front yard setback of between twenty-five and thirty feet (25'-30') for at least 60% of their front facade. All areas surrounding Smuggler Grove Road/East Meadow Subdivision maintain different zoning designations and, therefore, different front yard setback requirements. Accordingly, the only potential opportunity for obtaining a "consistent facade line" at some point in the future is along Smuggler Grove Road, but not throughout the surrounding neighborhood where minimum front yard setbacks are only ten (10) feet. Consequently, the only "context" truly worthy of consideration is the homes/properties fronting on Smuggler Grove Road. Including the subject lot,there are a total of eight (8) properties fronting on Smuggler Grove Road (see accompanying Context Map). There are seven lots on Smuggler Grove Road that are currently developed, but as the accompanying context map and photos show, the structures on these lots maintain no consistent building orientation, setback pattern or relationship to the street. The home on the lot immediately to the east (number "1" on the context map and photos) is not oriented parallel to the street as required by other RDS, and it has a front yard setback of approximately sixteen (16) feet, or 9'-14' forward of where the build-to-lines standard (PID 2737-181-06-001) • o . April 17, 2014 320 Midland Avenue-RDS Variance Page 4 would require development on the subject property. The duplex structure on the next lot (numbered "2" on the context map and photos) to the east is also oriented in a manner that is not parallel to the street (but skewed in the direction opposite the structure on the intervening lot "1"), and this duplex structure's front facade has a minimum front yard setback of approximately thirty-seven feet (37'), or 7'-12' back from where the build-to- lines standard would require development on the subject property. The next house to the east (numbered "3" on the context map and photos) maintains an approximately 24 foot front yard setback but no portion of the structure is oriented parallel to the street. The home at the dead end (numbered "4" on the context map and photos) has a front yard setback of approximately twelve (12) feet. The south side of the street is even more haphazard, with one of these three structures (numbered "5" on the context map and photos) hidden toward the rear of its lot and behind a gated drive. Similarly, the single-family house at the southeast corner of Smuggler Grove Road and Midland Avenue (numbered "7" on the context map and photos) looks like a multi-family structure and is fully oriented toward Midland Avenue (not Smuggler Grove); its setback from Smuggler Grove Road is approximately 5'-6'. In other words, the structures on Smuggler Grove Road do not at all address the street in a manner that creates any kind of consistent facade line or at all defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, these properties are very much obscured by a combination of parking, fencing and landscaping such that visibility of the houses and front yard areas is limited, at best. Clearly, this neighborhood does not provide an opportunity to "address the street in a manner which creates a consistent faVade line'." Accordingly, granting of the requested will have no affect at all on the neighborhood scale, character or streetscape. In recognition of these circumstances and the fact that a wholesale redevelopment of the neighborhood cannot be expected during the lifespan of the proposed residence, the applicant has sensitively sought to "provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. " The applicant has accomplished this by addressing the spirit of the applicable RDS as a whole, and the build-to lines standard in particular, relative to the lot's Midland Avenue frontage. For instance, 100% of the facade facing Midland Avenue will be developed parallel to the street and at the ten (10) foot setback line, which is consistent with front setbacks along Midland Avenue. The Midland Avenue facade includes a one-story, front porch-like element/canopy that covers more than 50 square feet, a properly scaled (less than 8' tall) entrance that is less than 10 feet back from the front-most wall, and several principal windows, none of which span through the area between 9 and 12 feet above the finished first floor. This front porch canopy element also comprises more than 20% of the building's overall width along Midland Avenue, and no nonorthogonal windows are proposed. No lightwells will be located in front of this facade either. Finally, vehicular access to the site will be from the private drive (Smuggler Grove Road), such that the single-stall garage will be side-loaded relative to Midland Avenue. (PID 2737-181-06-001) April 17, 2014 RECEIVEL 320 Midland Avenue-RDS Variance Page APR 17 2014 CITY OF ASPLN C%VJNff DEVELOPMENT Section 26.410.010(A) of the Code explains that, "Neighborhood character is largely established by the relationship between front facades of buildings and the streets they face. By orienting buildings parallel to the street and maintaining a certain consistency in front setback patterns, there is interaction between residents and passersby and the built environment." In addition, the same Code Section goes on to further explain that, "The area between the street and the front door of the home is a transition between the public realm of the neighborhood and the private life of a dwelling...it is important not to close off views of the front lawn and house." The opportunity for achieving these goals/purposes of the RDS standards exists in far greater magnitude along Midland Avenue than it does along Smuggler Grove Road. Nevertheless, the proposed design complies with the letter of all of the applicable RDS other than the build-to lines requirement relative to Smuggler Grove Road, which is a private, dead end drive with haphazard development patterns and no pedestrian facilities. Homes along Smuggler Grove Road are randomly setback behind private, head-in parking areas, fences and landscaping, making the semi-public realms difficult to see and virtually nonexistent in many cases. Midland Avenue, by contrast, is a highly used, public collector street with relatively consistent fagade lines. The proposed design addresses the purposes of not only the build-to lines standard, but also the purposes of all of the applicable RDS relative to the lot's Midland Avenue frontage. Consequently, the applicant has provided "an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. " Finally, one of the applicant's primary goals in developing the subject property is to maintain as many of the healthy trees as possible. The density of existing trees that can be maintained within 30 feet of the front property line provides an unusual site-specific constraint under which fairness would dictate granting of the requested variance. That is, there are at least 10 existing trees between 25 and 30 feet from the front property line (i.e., where 60% of the front fagade would need to be located to comply with the standard), and another 5-7 significant trees are in the area between this zone and the proposed front fagade of the house. While not all of these 10-17 trees are in perfect health, many of them are worthy of saving but would all have to be eliminated to provide compliance with the build-to line standard. Forcing elimination of all of these trees would seem a pointless shame not only for the applicant but also for the neighbors, especially in light of the context and severely limited opportunity to achieve a consistent fagade line along Smuggler Grove Road anyway, as described above. In summary, the proposed development complies with the spirit and the intent of the RDS. It complies with the letter of all but one of the applicable RDS. The foregoing narrative, coupled with the accompanying plans and photos, demonstrates that the limited extent of the requested variance is justified by the context in which the development is proposed, constraints specific to the site, and the proposed design's continued ability to (PID 2737-181-06-001) April 17, 2014 320 Midland Avenue -RDS Variance Page 6 promote the purpose of the standards, particularly along the more public and more important Midland Avenue frontage. As such, it is respectfully requested that the Community Development Director administratively approve the variance by signing on the space provided on the following page. If you should have any questions, or if I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, Haas Land Planning, LLC _� _b Mitch Haas Owner/Manager cc: Bob Walker, Walker Design Services Exhibits: 1. Proof of Ownership 2. Land Use Application and Dimensional Requirements Form 3. Authorization Letter 4. Pre-Application Conference Summary 5. Fee Agreement Attachments: • Existing conditions survey (2 sheets) • Proposed Site and Floor Plans (3 sheets) • Graphic 3-D massing model (3 sheets) • Context Map and Aerial Photo (2 sheets) • Lot and Neighborhood Context Photos (10 sheets) Signed and Approved: Date: Chris Bendon, City of Aspen Community Development Director (PID 2737-181-06-001) Owner's Policy-Schedule B Order No.: 070 1T Policy No.: 72306-43957192 OWNER' S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE issued by TITLE COMPANY of the rockies as agent for CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE A Order No.: 0704107-0 Policy Number:72306-43957192 Amount of Insurance: Premium: Date of Policy: October 23,2013 1. Name of Insured: HTM Properties,LLC,a Nevada limited liability company 2. The estate or interest in the Land which is covered by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the Land is vested in: HTM Properties,LLC,a Nevada limited liability company 4. The Land referred to in this policy is located in the County of Pitkin,State of Colorado,and described as follows: Lot 1, EAST MEADOW SUBDIVISION,according to the Plat thereof filed July 26,1966 in Plat Book 3 at Page 99. Countersigned: Authorized Officer of Agent RECEIVED Page 1 of 2 APR 17 2014 CITY OFASPEN COMM"Ty DEVELOPMENT ® d . . Owner's Policy-Schedule B(continued) Order No.: 0704107-0 Policy No.: 723 06-43 95 7192 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage(and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys'fees or expenses)which arise by reason of- t. Any and all unpaid taxes,assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 2. Any vein or lode of quartz or other rock in place bearing gold,silver,cinnabar,lead,tin,copper,or other valuable deposits,claimed or known to exist within subject property as of March 23, 1885,as expressly excepted and excluded in United States Patent recorded June 17, 1949,in Book 175 at Page 246. 3. Terms,agreements,provisions,conditions and obligations as contained in Deed recorded July 19, 1966,in Book 221 at Page 429. 4. Easements,rights of way and other matters as shown on the Plat of said Subdivision. 5. Intentionally omitted. 6. Easement and right of way granted to Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District by instrument recorded August 24, 1970,in Book 250 at Page 137. 7. Annexation Map recorded September 15, 1987,in Plat Book 20 at Page 5. 8. All right,title,claim,demand or interest which may be asserted by the owners of adjoining property in and to subject property or by the owners of subject property in and to adjacent property,based on adverse possession or otherwise,due to or resulting from the failure of the fences located on subject property and adjacent property to follow established boundary lines,as evidenced by Improvement Survey recorded January 14,2008,at Reception No.545845 and Improvement Survey Plat by High Country Engineering,Inc.dated September 23,2013,File No. 1701.DWG. 9. Terms,agreements,provisions,conditions and obligations as contained in Trench,Conduit,and Vault Agreement recorded September 30,2009,at Reception No.563330. 10. Terms,agreements,provisions,conditions and obligations as contained in City of Aspen Community Development Department Administration Determination recorded September 30,2013,at Reception No.604346. 11. Deed of Trust from HTM Properties,LLC,a Nevada limited liabil Fpmpnnv to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of Wells Fargo Bank,N.A. ,dated October 21,2013 and recorded October 23,2013 at Reception No.604946. Page 2 of 2 . • EXHIBIT D a 9 ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: 2--�� //�� / Name: P / S v 3 0o/ ` / ( d > Location: 3 a A rd Ave-',, AS 1 6q S� hieodad (Indicate street address, lot&bock number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) 3 —Q&— APPLICANT: ��-++ Name: e1 �f L_C Address: rl a C a S Phone#: REPRESENTATIVE: / - / Name: l��a PX S Address: a/'] 1 > S Phone#: Q' q9,5—_19'0 22— TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check a]1 that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA—8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc.) -/ l0 �l�truC Q .S16ale ZLI 1-4 �e All Ull-el �Z�}�14 2nd V,4 k-/a , �- O Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ •Oa © Pre-Application Conference Summary © Attachment#1, Signed Fee Agreement ® Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form ar �����Q Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Stan 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written tdk 17 2014 (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should inclu a SP�� electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit'M1 e[.� cOmIuIury omLOPMENT Q :S L U e C ,j: Coo 35 g�f 8 CA1UC_L< 0 G 14.!� 'VI C) t 3 0 a 0 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 3� mala Applicant: Pfo es I,� Location: 141 spi?el Zone District: -/S Lot Size: 27, gqq Lot Area: ,S ( or the pu oses of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements, and steep.slopes.Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: A//-4 Proposed. A A Number of residential units: Existing: O Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: O Pro posed.• /) Proposed%of demolition(Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: q Floor Area: Existing. /✓� Allowable: 13/S Proposed: 3 Principal bldg. height: Existing: ( Allowable: Z S Proposed r Access. bldg. height: Existing: 1l Allowable: N A Proposed: N Q On-Site parking: Existing: i I Required: 2 Proposed: Z. % Site coverage: Existing: i► Required.• A A Proposed.• 11A %Open Space: Existing: 11 Required: N A Proposed: N Front Setback: Existing: >> Required: 2' S t Proposed: 15 Rear Setback: Existing: 11 Required.• /0 Proposed: S-"' r o I Combined F/R: Existing: t Required: Al A Proposed: _ Side Setback: Existing: N Required: /D � Proposed: `� 10 I Side Setback: Existing: it Required: Proposed:, I O Combined Sides: Existing: 11 Required.• A/ A Proposed.• Distance Between Existing t 1 Required:-1-42/ Proposed.•N A Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: to ��"l,S/2!E Variations requested: One & "I D 1 G 0 ,Fdd4nl� (eW/Cl'7o CIAJ r • E IBIT 3 City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S.Galena Street Aspen,CO 81611 RE: 320 Midland Avenue,Aspen(Lot 1,East Meadow Subdivision) (PID#2737-181-06-001) Residential Design Variance To whom it may concern: As applicant for a Residential Design Variance on the above referenced property, I hereby authorize Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP), Walker Design Services (WDS), and Sherman&Howard,LLC (S&.H) to act as designated and authorized representatives for the preparation, submittal and processing of a letter requesting the approval listed above, as well as, any subsequent applications associated therewith. HLP,WDS and S&H are also authorized to represent HTM Properties, LLC in meetings with City staff, the Historic Preservation Commission,the Planning and Zoning Commission,and the Aspen City Council. I Should.you have any need to contact me during the course of your review, please do so through Haas Land Planning,LLC. Yo x2AI Curtis B.San ers, o HTM Properties,LLC 10200 Stone Briar Las Vegas,NV 89144 (702) 732-2717 RECEIVED APR 17 ?Rld BUS M5218188.1 CITY OF ASPtN CWNITY DEVELOPMENT • EXHIBIT CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Justin Barker, 429.2797 DATE: 4/3/2014 PROJECT: 320 Midland Ave REPRESENTATIVE: Bob Walker, Mitch Haas REQUEST: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variance DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located at 320 Midland Avenue, and is Lot 1 of the East Meadow Subdivision. The lot is 9,850 square feet according to the plat recorded at Book 3, Page 99, and is located on Midland Avenue between Smuggler Grove Road and Mascotte Lane, both private roads. The property is currently zoned (R-15A) Moderate Density Residential and is a vacant lot. This property is not located within the Aspen Infill area. The proposal is to construct a single-family home on the lot. In order to protect a significant amount of vegetation on the property, the applicant intends to construct the majority of the building mass on the north portion of the property, closer to Mascotte Lane. An administrative determination has been recorded for this lot (reception #604346) declaring the lot line facing Smuggler Grove Road as the front lot line. The applicant requests the following residential design standard variance (Land Use Code Section): 1. On parcels or lots of less than 15,000 square feet, at least 60% of the front fagade shall be within 5 feet of the minimum front yard setback line (26.410.040.A.2). Staff will accept an application for administrative review. The following two criteria are used in determining the------ appropriateness of a variance: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. If staff cannot support administrative approval, application can be made to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%2OFees/2013%2Oland%20use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Usk/-- � D APR 17 2014 Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): CITY OF 26.306 Common Development Review Procedures DEVELOPMENT MENT 1 EXHIBIT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 9 Agreement to Pay Application Fees Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property HTM Properties, LLC Phone No.: (702)732-2717 Owner("I"): Email: tduboef @toprank.com Address of 320 Midland Avenue, Aspen Billing 10200 Stone Briar Property: Address: Las Vegas, NV 89144 (subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable_ $ $650 flat fee for Parks $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter.stated. $ 650 deposit for 2 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$325 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time.Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Pro rty e Chris Bendon HTM Prop Community Development Director By: City Use: Title: RECEIVED Fees Due:$ Received:$ APR 17 2014 BUS-RE/5218189.1 CITY OF ASPEN C TY OKLOPMENT r I via 60 4 Mo;MA Xv oil �► "IN /ir• NV IAN 61491;m!(I :• � � �\mat''��i,����,>;�`��;,. r � " I I M66_� - �_- - -- - L- W ° �� ��, _ „ •••'-"•••••••'••••-•-..... MIDLAND AVENUE F-7 � O J v G y O ........... i x N �{.�t /ice :-: '••••+,• � Q rG v O �• ���� l '' _ J v p �... i.•: _ T Trrrt"t't-rrr •� I --•- 'p --____�- .Z 120.37'54 OOW -- _N04 _ •..... 4— LrX]/ N•� �• '" I � FFrrrrrrrrrr. : 1 • + I Fi-F r FFFFrFFFFFF j • • &• • rrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrr!: -----� • • I N 1 •:, `, • "`• rrrr rrrr rrrrrr.: I r_--♦-- : t __ rrr:rrrrrrrrrrrFrrrrrrr.' i g I rrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrr r rrrr rrrrrr• 1 • III rrrrr,r rFrrrr�rrFrrr'rrrFFrFFrrrrFrrrrrr • • j • 1 rrrrr e�rr rrrrrrrrr rr rrrrrrrrrrr f SETBACK i �/wTE •, • rrrrrrFr FrrrrrrrrrrFFrrFFrrrrrrrrrr f • rrr rrrr rrrrr rr rrrrrrrrrrrr �vr+ r-r rrr I j j rfrrrrrrr rr rrrrrrr FFrrrr�r- rrrrFFFF rr`•rrrrrrr rrrrr ❑ t`• rrrrrrrrr rrrrr rr rrrr' rr rr ,rr rrrrr j r.rrrrrrrrrrr r rrrr rr;rrrrrrrrrrFrrrrr rrrFrrrrrr rrrr `I r� rrrrrr-f;r r FF.rrrrrrrrrFFFFrr�rrFr��FFrrrFrrF I 1 r rrrrrr..rr. rrrrr~ > rfrFrrr rrrFirrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrFFrl-FFF rrrrr ! rrrrrrr rFFrrrrrrrrrFFF rrrrr rrrrrFrrrrrrF� rrrrrrrr rr rrrrr �8 i • .- ji rrr rrrrrrrr rrr rrrrrrr rrrrrr rrr rrrr R FFFrrFFFFFFFFrA FF rr rr rrrFrrrcr{rrrr. FrrrrFrrrrrrrrrrr r�Frrrrrrrrrr rrrrrr F r FFFFFFrrrrrrrrrrrr rr rr r • rrrrrr-r r-rr FrrrrrrrrrrrrFrrr rFF I H I •j rrrrrrr rrrrr r rrr rrr:rFrrrrrr .:., rrrr rrrr: rrr rrrrr rrrrr rp, 1 rrrrrrrF rrrFF FrFFrr F rr FFrrrrrrrr >', ... 1 . r�*FFrrr rr-rrrr I rrrrFrrrrrf!rrrrr rrrrrrrrr rr rrrr rrrrrrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrr rrrrrrrrr rr rrrr r •...., j.' .-- '' '� �` rrrrrrrrrFF'rr rrrrrrFF1 rrr rrr rrrrrr, I''+r ' •• .rrrrrrFrrrrr rFrrrrrrrrrFFrr rrrr rrrr rrrrrrFrrrrFrlrrrrr - rrrrrrrrr rrrr rrrr rrrrFrrrFrrrrrrFFrFr rrrr T rrr rrrr rrrr r r rrr u' rrrrrrrrr r rrr rrrrrr r r rrr rF FFFFrrrrrrrr rrrr rrrFFrrrrrr r ' '':., ! FFF �FFFFFFFFFrFrrrrrrrr r.FrrFr _ j rrrrr FFFrrFFFF . rrrr =Fr FF rr ::,' / '; I FFFFFrFFrFFFrrrFrF € F�r� rrrr rrrr r rr r rrrrrrr co r-rFr rrrrr .- .... .*... ! -- Z :::..... rrrrrr / ' j ! STM C 1 ": • ( I I j t o .-._._._--.-.-. ! _.-.J._._-.� --- j �. j o O p v j1 � •L � 1 s I I ! � I ! ................... ........... i STOM f I 1 cb 0 cm 00 O 0 I • w / �• eig I x j t o -ter N I gig: •� 1 If • Ott �� --+ Z I 4 • • f r D rrl 1 ! (� cp 1 u. I j1•� ;cr g 1 ff I Oo11 f •k •k / ` ;• ! t f .T- ........... �..........:•' -....L------L-------------- ------ Llw �Lw 0101 Ij •* (i •'• • •:� • •N SETBACK cn IN 1 p w= j j �. �• !... • _u� N00 8 OOW• • ° • • • --® 1 bMI E1 121.07' -----•- -•--------------------------------------------------------- ; --- --•-•-•-------- --..-• --•--'...... '-•-'............ - , APR 17 2014 ITY OF ASPEt C �' DmLOPME MIDLAND AVENUE EE O N 120.37 ______.—._.—._._._.—.—.—.—•—— 0 : os � N04 54 OOW _--- ...... _ •N s ! -.-_. r'rrrrr�r rr'�Frrr • • '• m 1 -'- �, rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr • g� - -' rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr j • • rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr ------T • ;, j • • rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 1 -�-----i I •ill rrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r-- --•1 1 g I • rr rrrrrr" rrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr •!C I • rrrrrrrr r rr-FFrr FFFrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr • ice/OAS j • I 1 rrrrrrrrr Fr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr- I • • i i • rrrrrrrrrr FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFrr�rrrrc rr 1 J ffi rrrrrrrrrrr rr_rCCr-r rr Gr� rrrrrrr-Frrrrrrrrrrr rrrrr 1 ! rrrrrrrrrrrr r fFf' rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrr • j j rrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rr rrrr ig� rrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr rrrr j I 1 • �m rrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r r rrrr I r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrF > rrrrlrFFrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr J rrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r rt�rrrrr I • j rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrr ► 8 j I rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr FrFrrFFFrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrr rrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrFFrrrrrrFFrrr I j= rrrrrrrrrrr rrr F Frr rrrr F F F >� • rrrrrr rrrrrrrrr r r rrrrrrrrrr rrrrrr • rrrrr rr rrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrr ► �, ! rrrrrrr�rrrrrrFr F F�rrrrFFFFFFFFFFFr 1 rF rFFFFFrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrFrrFFFFFFFFF ► j j rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr-rrr�rrrF�r—rrrrrFFrr f •� rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrFFrFFr�Frrrrr rr rrrrrrrrr rr r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr #FFFrrFrrrrrrr .N N1 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr I I rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr j rrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr rrrrrrrr r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rr I 1 rrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr r`•f�i rrrrrr / 1 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr 8 I oho rrrrrrrrrrr co• 1 __ j = rrrrr i • 1 i I sTOR. 0 Frr • j I I i s � 1-' 1 •- _ _ - ._._._._._._._._._. +._._._._.--------- ._._._. ._-. ._._._.,. -•-• _j-•- o • FBI � � I 1 1 J j m � i = •� Jg f � ' �I 1 I � rO Zs ji STOR. �! I co o Ijl 1 --- jl • • I D a s o o f j j i i • • i00 f u If ! I T • f (b o If if rri I ! f � I C5 j I I •Y •� f! liG � � C5 I•m r I � / N m if • i i U1 [fl j •� i "\ 1 •� • • • • • •:r • • •N SETBACK I RECt:1 (Ac/) j Sm • • • ! °- C) = N• • • �� u• ; N00 28 OOW• • • ; 121.07' • • • • ® !1 APR ] 7 X14 --------------------------------------------—•---•—•—......—•—..——————————•—._. ...... _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.—._._._._._._._. �. CITY OF PEN C� LOPME N w 6 83 82 81 A UPPER LEM!PLAN DUBOU RESIDENCE 320 MIDLAND AW- ASPEN.CO 81811 4.1.14 0 5 10 15 20 49 • . 37 50 • 38 48 4• 45 : � 48 Ii 39 42 • 34 40 • APR 0 3 2014 Al-441k'42 DW-516AJ 33 tic- Lu r TS •._- 10 12 11 16 15 • 17 19 20 18f 31 32 I SCH-2 9'V-;7'7- ! ` � TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LL� r� ,, LOT 1, EAST MEADOW SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 99 MO�a a 3z CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO �g� o 0 �19� V '$. IN Ili ( 10.0' �r - ¢ OIJgO NO 4 REBAR URUh k YELLOW PLASTIC EA DAP MA 41 SEMENT RKED LSi61ri J.PAGE� � � R o-! (7.. I CIF _ (. ASPNKT ROAQ.. I •_ 1 4'^-W9,• `.N64..� _' �_ 154 725- FL �°4 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER Y ) `.+nf •`," ON CONCRETE PAD TREECHART TREE TYPE SRE DRS 1 DECIDUOUS NO 9ARNNS�.SICN-}�� T I- 2 DEa000U5 it' 22' y��� 4U 5 3 B2e UOUS 7 DECIDUOUS 12 I 4 �cwv0S q , 5 DECIDUOUS T '1• 6 DECID ' Z O o - 1 8 DELIOUWS B t { t V. '80 i r` I 07.. DECIDUOUS 9 IB 10 DEGDUWS S 8' t 4 YL <', 11 DECIDUOUS 6 12 H 4t 4'' ✓ 12 DECIDUOUS 4' 8 `r w' a I I ! ti;U, W• 13 DECIDUOUS 4 6 m K o N O 14 DECIDUOUS 6 12 V` I - ri_ I°=w 1 Y 1s DECIDUOUS 4 6 v 16 OU 16 DOUS 4 6 t7 DECIDUOUS or 16' o 0 8 DEGDUWS 12 24! GRAPHIC SCALE 19 D dOUWS 4 k e' OECIOUDUS 6 ,3 LOT ], OECIW WS I7 22' s.o'unun 22 DECIDUOUS 9 6 Z I BOOK 3,PAGE 99 27 DEGOVW$ 16 (IN pEB7') 9,849 SQ.F T. zs o°EEC s a ie t 9n- o re. (Ej I o 1 - 26 DECIDUOUS B 16' �• N DECIDUOUS 9 18' •� z9 DECIDUOUS 17 26 LEGEND [ 1 LBO 2 30 DECIDUOUS 10 20 p^ ?034 ! y al JI DECIDUOUS 3 6 fill WATER VALVE p[, DECIDUOUS 5. to' Z_ U 9 33 DECIDUOUS 6 12 [�j GAS LINE MARKER rr/n� y( 34 DECIDUOUS S 10 V Z 29 35�.- t U 35 DECIDUW S 4• B' CQ> POWER POLE 36 DECIDUOUS 18• 7 m Q TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ,`•, 37 DECIDUOUS 14 /W' V I 'Z. /R► R b'/ \�, \ 'r[ '` T 39 DECIDUOUS 7• is• I 1 •�I■s _I, P "--EKSTING 4o OEaouous 3 6 Y° 0@� FENCE 41 DECIDUOUS 4 8' �'•��FI j 1 DECIDUOUS 6 12' J IL "'^ 47 Eg0UW5 12' 24' t 1 �! a,, u oEaouous s 0 a_ 1, ,a ( h h 46 DECIOUWS 4 e Z G ?1r,I�` y y •'" s7 4B DECIDUOUS II 22' t ` ( 4 c6wWS a SD PROPERTY DESCRIPTION t ( ¢ T f,°•'• t "{ :A 50 DECIOUWS 11 22 ( \ E U ) C { r" 51 DECIDUOUS 9 16' _ \ U ( �" IS4r f y DECIDUOUS 6 12 LOT 1,EAST MEADOW SUBDIVISION,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED JULY 26, 1966 A9 -._Hf<J I t N � �. i 53 DECIDUOUS 14 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 99,SAID SUBDIVISION BEING IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 10 T"';: {L SOU TH,RANGE 84 NEST OF THE 6TH PRINIGPAL MERIDIAN. . /S, spa , 4,j- H 54 DECIDUOUS 6 12 .'•iB LL 55 DECIDUOUS 6 12 y � /F I • 56 DECIDUOUS y* YAS �jd�jy OECWUWS 4J 40 40 > yp se DEGDUOU 30 4o NOTES: 1 I .AN oEaWWS 38 36 48,I Op. 60 DEgOUWS T2' 24 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF SB7•ST40'E BETWEEN THE 1 S1DV SIGN •/ P / L�Y 1 ,r 6t DECIDUOUS 3 8' SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST MEADOW SUBDIVISION A 05 REBAR WITH 1-1/2'ALUMINUM DECA 3 8' CAP(LS ILLEGOLE)AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF n4E EAST MEADOW SUBDIVISION AN -� X 6 DEgDUWS 3 6 ALUMINUM CAP(LS ILLEGIBLE)IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. APPROXIMATE 9 18' SNOW PLOWED I 7D DSr 86 DECIDUOUS 9 16' 2. THE DATE OF THIS TOPOGRPAHIC SURVEY WAS FEBRUARY 4,2014. DECNOUOU$ 12 24 3, LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THE FIELD SURVEY WERE U S.SURVEY FEET. 7z AREA L- _ 67 .yF d 4 bd 4 CIDUWS 4 6 _ 4. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT To RESERVATIONS,RESTRICTIONS,COVENANT$AND EASEMENTS (A k + ; 03 Td",I i,.;,' OF RECORD,OR IN PUCE AND EXOEPTIONS TO nnE$HONK IN THE TITLE COMMITMENTS PREPARED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES.COMMITMENT NO 0704107-C.EFFECTIVE DATE AUGUST 14,2015. 0 , M+I t7 f ANY 1N� T• _ {{ REBM S. THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY K BASED W HE EAST MEADOW SUBOVIyON PLAT RECORDED Z ., JUNE 28 1966 IN PUT BOON 3 AT PAGE 9p,EAST MEADOW AND.IUKATI ANNEXATION RECEPTION N0.292863.AN W W u)H C \ I _ IMPROVEMENT SURVEY RECORDED IN 14,2008 AT RECEPTION NO.545845 AND 20 AT PAGE 5 AS RECEP i PLACE AS$HONK. o L = w- 0 a L, r. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT 0 U $a r %rms1ENcHmAFtk— I.FRANK W,HARRNGTON,DOH EREBY$TALE THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SUR WAS PRO BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGNNEERING.INC.FOR TODD D.BOEF,THAT SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURSBT3T40'E 361,68' WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER NY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS ^-� (BASS OF BEARINGS) '?` 4"�: 3 _- -. -10- -y TRUE AND CORRECT TO HE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. F„®L0 4 ) SW CORNER OF EAST - _ I11 J+ MEADOW SUBDIVISION FOUND - I �I /s REBAR AND 1 1/2' _ SE CORNER OF EAST 1 2014-' 1•' -� ALUMINUM CAP.LS ILLEGIBLE - MEADOW SUBDIVISION ELEVATION:7953.26 FOUND ALUMINUM GAP BY_ LS ILLEGIBLE FRANK W.HARRIN L,$ No.•1 6 t`.d CITY OF PR0A�"4 N9TR'. ACC9M6MC W WLORAF9 MAW.611 WFT M•Ndt!AKY LLCM 1 O.c .ctrl CIA®uF9K AIr ao[cl n Ma 9MIEr WRN tIR¢xAtl am w�nrc mrrr M I�iM r�T'R'wNici�i T®K+o�»Mx�'K"id - -...•.,�. rwa mu TIC aAtF a WMaATtlN saw.arsaN I OF I alos �s a IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT a LOT 1,EAST MEADOW SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 99 a c� CITY OF ASPEN,COUNTY OF PITKIN,STATE OF COLORADO e o I a MASCOT7E LANE t MACOiTE LANE" o: LOT 1 I I LOT2 mow, ,I.ieuP Ulem L=3 LOT Lora \ R t2 1 BMUGC LER - . I GROVE _A0 o,nr.- a I-irr 8I F� A o BOUNDARY CONTROLA IS I ? PROPERTY DESCRIPTION =Wm P I,< LOT 1 � � Z 9,849 SQ.FT. i ` NOTES:xus,a raP tws sn.Er n.xnaw v m t i,m]n nxES+ 4 y � LOT 2 �,��.��E�.;..°I�.-�;��:,��:���°t° z .,E Em...aa 7.aP>o:I.,�Pa .I. � - om..,�aw IPnw.m ma i cl IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT TME £ gar sun:m.,>��wnatcuwiu�maw�u�c.�,w n�c aw�rau' E" Z. A T t12 uIPrtOKnOi nwNlxl .BOK oESdIBEO P..- »7 I .rz.mvmeEa Is,mu EC ws, ' I Bd. a'ME P.M¢L Ex¢v i.R5 O StEiYoE,u 3 I— p ;9.NS —T OT P1 R iL z. Fwnn6.E�S>[,c%C EPI AS �. '`•� �s.W GRAPHIC SCALE mwix ..mmxc+w.E�+ m —_ `P �2 won K 0 D W ,. CLERK AND RECORDERSCERDFICATE �V GROVE.ROAD r ^;� �a o s t'"w° o o �ER�o 1-3 aw.rl Im Pa» 1 OF 1 COMMUNITY • ' Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name:.�f."T/�l p p l /� /� Property �l ! l�f?icic-1!� Ll C� ea IidRvS SoPaS Owner ("I"). Email: Phone No.: 0-9m,9E�s @s�,e►W� w�.coM �9 a _00 Address of 32o /y/"'9p%0 ✓��Uc{� Pro e P rtY= p (subject of j�� 0 $C'�0l/ �G�T/� �/15T/'/��cStlB�l✓/S/D�J� application) I certify as follows: (pick one) 56 This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. � I ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. j I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I i understand that this document is a public document. i Owner signature: date: Owner printed name: i or, Attorney signature: date: Q i Attorney printed name: G/ S C� S October, 1 0•0 i