HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.845 Meadows Rd.0060.2014.ASLU 41W
THE CITY OF ASPEN
FILE 1 OF 3
City of Aspen Community Development Department
CASE NUMBER 0060.2014.ASLU
PARCEL ID NUMBERS 273512129809
PROJECTS ADDRESS 845 MEADOWS ROAD
PLANNER HILLARY SEMINICK
CASE DESCRIPTION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
REPRESENTATIVE JIM CURTIS
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 8.7.14
CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 9.3.14
2? 5- 12 I2a gO9 20 (4- . St-t4
`
aft �
w
Permits
fib Edit Record Naigate Form Report Format Tats Delp
1
ix v v jump 1 ;
I IV
_ _ ........
mam Ginn f W—q status "Fee Summary go Rating�istory _.
3
Permt tppe `aslu 1Aspen Lard Use Permft_ 60214ASLU
A ddress 8 5 P�9E D0'"dS RD Aptlkte
C �SPEdd Mate CCU dip 81611
FermitInformation
I Punster permit Routing queue laslu87 Applied
Ned Status jpending npprued
[ seription APP!CATION FOR INSUDSTATIAL PLAIIIIED DE IEL��'f��'>EP1T�A(�9EPl��1Ed°1T Isue
a.
Closed Final
submted JIM CURTIS 64416 Clock RunnTing I pays Expires I0'.1812810
Ovaier
' Last name :ASPEN IIdSTITI>TE INC Firm name�� PD 8D 222
i DUEENTD'Ovill MD 21658
r
Phone (9 78)+19 4412 Address
P Appli
k'
h Owner is applicant? �I Conlraclor is applicant?
r �
Last name iASPEN INSTITUTE INC First name PO oD; 222 e
DUEBP TDAII I�1D 2166a "
l_ Phone q V 319-6492 Cust= 29 26 �rF s j
Lender
Last name Firsk name
�3
Phone i ' Address
Displays the permitlender's address Aspen&16(server angelas loll
23
Z34q-9 P A
66 5 a J �
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site-specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three (3) -year vested property right. The vested property right
shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless the
change is accomplished or a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or
unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant
to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full
force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section
26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective
date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site-specific
development plan as described below.
Property Owner's Name,Mailing Address and telephone number:
Aspen Institute
1000 N. Third St. Aspen, CO 81611
970-544-7906
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property:
Aspen Meadows Subdivision, Lot 1-B
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan:
Insubstantial Planned Development Amendment at 845 Meadows Road, Aspen CO
81611
Land Use Approval Received and Dates:
Administrative approval granted August 1, 2014
Effective Date of Development Order:
August 7, 2014. (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
Expiration Date of Development Order:
August 7, 2017 (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation
may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal
Code.)
Issued t is 1St day of August 2014 by the City of Aspen Community Development Director.
&A; —
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director
City of Aspen
r 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306
ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: �� O-Jkdi9 S Sq b4 ��s�g'1� (7
Aspen, CO
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
County of Pitkin )
gt4l, /'1 r Yt name lease rint
(name, p )
being or representing an Applicant to theitity of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that
I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section
26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
V Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days
after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is
attached hereto.
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper
or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after
an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
Signature
The foreg Zg "Affidavit of Notice"was ac�o/wledn ed befor e thisT ay
Of , 200�y /�//��%
PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS 7TH ,fir HAND�,r1� �,7�-� 7-� T C�
Of
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL YyI NESS Mi HAND AND OFFICIAL `SEAL
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the I
approval of asite-specific development plan,and
the creation of a vested property right pursuant to My iss. n ex es:
the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title
24,Article 68,Colorado Revised Statutes,pertain-
ing to the following described property:Parcel ID
82735-121-29-809,Legally described as Aspen
Meadows Subdivision,Lot 1-B,City of Aspen,Pit-
kin County,Colorado.The approval grants an In-
substantial Amendment to the Aspen Meadows P
SPA.The request is to memorialize an existing Yary
geodesic dome.The change is depicted in the land
=Pit on file with the City of Aspen. For
further information contact Hillary Seminick at the
City of Aspen Community Development Dept.,130
S.Galena St.,Aspen,Colorado.(970)429-2741.
City of As ATTACHMENTS: CHRISTOPHER LUNDGREN
Published in The Aspen Times on August 7,2014. NOTARY PUBLIC
(10436163)
STATE OF COLORADO
COPY OF THE PUBLICATION NOTARY ID 20144000722
COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.09,2018
RECr-7TI®N#: 612421, 08/0712014 at
03:0,x; PM,
10-F 3, R $21.00 Doc Code APPROVAL
Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO
NOTICE OF APPROVAL
FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
TO ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, LOT 1-B ACADEMIC FACILITY AND
AUDITORIUM; COMMONLY KNOWN AS ASPEN MEADOWS, 845
MEADOWS ROAD
Parcel ID: 2735-121-29-809
APPLICANT: Aspen Institute
1000 N. Third St. Aspen, CO 81611
970-544-7906
REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis, Curtis & Associates
300 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611
970-319-0442
SUBJECT &
SITE OF APPROVAL: Insubstantial Planned Development (PD) Amendment at
845 Meadows Road, Aspen CO 81611.
ZONING: Academic/SPA
SUMMARY:
The applicant requests an Insubstantial Planned Development (PD) (formerly known as
Specially Planned Area/SPA) Amendment to the Aspen Meadows SPA. The amendment
will memorialize the Buckminster Fuller geodesic dome. The dome, which has existed on
the Aspen Institute property since the 1960s, when it was used as a pool cover. In 1992,
the pool was decommissioned and the dome was moved to an area south of the Crown
and Arco Lodge buildings, where it fell into disrepair, until it was restored in 2011.
After the dome was restored it was relocated to its present location east of Andersen Park,
as shown in Exhibit A — Site Location. Restoration included repair of the frame and
covering the dome in weatherproof canvas. The site was graded to level the surface and a
pad of crusher fines (small, compacted rock) was placed for the dome floor. Tree removal
was not required. The dome is used during the summer for smaller Institute functions
such as meetings and retreats. The dome is canvas covered and the cover does not fully
extend to the crusher fines floor. Furthermore, it is not a conditioned space and does not
have electricity. An exterior electric box outside is near the dome and available to those
utilizing the facility.
STAFF EVALUATION:
Geodesic domes have a long history at the Aspen Institute. Buckminster Fuller erected a
geodesic dome during the 1952 International Design Conference. After the conference
the dome was disassembled and relocated to Woods Hole, MA. A second canvas-covered
dome was built in 1955 to cover a swimming pool located south of the Meadows
Reception Center. Due to damage from the elements, the canvas cover was removed in
the 1960s. In 1992, the swimming pool was in a state of disrepair and was filled in. The
dome was then moved south of the Crown and Arco Lodge buildings. In 2011, the dome
was restored and moved to a treed, private area with better proximity to existing Institute
facilities. Restoration of the seasonal dome did not convert the space into a habitable,
conditioned space; therefore, no dimensional changes, such as an increase of floor area,
resulted from the restoration of the dome.
The geodesic dome, despite its long history on Institute grounds, was not addressed in
either the Aspen Meadows SPA or Ordinance 14, Series of 1991. However, because of
its history and importance at the Aspen Institute; Staff funds that memorialization of the
restored dome is consistent with the original approvals. Relocation of the facility to a
more accessible location is considered a minor change. Staff finds the review criteria for
an Insubstantial PD Amendment are met, as described in Exhibit B.
DECISION:
The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for an
Insubstantial PD Amendment as noted above and on Exhibit A to be consistent with
the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the request.
APMW BY:
v
Chris Bendon, Community Development Director Date
Attachments:
Exhibit A— Site Location (recorded)
Exhibit B —Insubstantial PD Amendment Review Criteria(not recorded)
Exhibit C —Application (not recorded)
•''iJ� 5y�f MINI P.W.15-1111-WINES,
.�, ^r -s "'�► �,....�+� y } -- ,• t\Av'aTC�>2 -h �c>giY"iY �:
1
Of OR
OEM
ORD
�. is�.\ ����` r1', �• �.h !�\fj :� y\ IUT A'.�.T� �I). ^'ice s ....Y;r3i�-T-^ \�
t III �
� r
( s. f
Qplf
1 44 jl%�&
EXHIBIT B
REVIEW CRITERIA& STAFF FINDINGS:
26.445.100. Amendments
A. Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved
development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community
Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment:
1. A change in the use or character of the development.
Staff Finding: Geodesic domes have a long history at the Aspen Institute.
Buckminster Fuller erected a geodesic dome during the 1952 International Design
Conference. After the conference the dome was disassembled and relocated to
Woods Hole, MA. A second canvas-covered dome was built in 1955 to cover a
swimming pool located south of the Meadows Reception Center. Due to damage
from the elements, the canvas cover was removed in the 1960s. In 1992, the
swimming pool was in a state of disrepair and was filled in. The dome was then
moved south of the Crown and Arco Lodge buildings.
Neither Ordinance 14, Series 1991 nor the Aspen Meadows Specially Planned Area
(SPA) Development & Subdivision Agreement specifically address the geodesic
dome; although this dome has been located on the property since 1955.
The memorization of the dome retains the character of the PD because of the
history of the element at the Aspen Institute. Staff finds this criterion met.
2. The request is consistent with the conditions and representations in the project's
original approval, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change.
Staff Finding: Although not addressed in Ordinance 14, Series 1991 nor the aspen
Meadows SPA, Staff feels the memorialization of the restored dome is consistent
with approval documents and preserves the history of this structure. The relocation
of the dome to its present location allows for better access to the facility from other
Institute facilities and is considered to be an insubstantial change. Staff finds this
criterion met.
3. The request does not require granting a variation from the project's allowed
use(s) and does not request an increase in the allowed height or floor area.
Staff Finding: The proposal does not require a variance be granted for this use.
The geodesic dome is an existing element and a part of the history of the Institute
property; therefore, the project would not increase floor area nor result in an
increase of allowed height. This criterion is not applicable.
4. Any proposed changes to the approved dimensional requirements are limited
to a technical nature, respond to a design parameter that would not have been
foreseen during the Project Review approval, are within dimensional
tolerances stated in the Project Review, or otherwise represents an
insubstantial change.
Staff Finding: The intent of the PD amendment is to memorialize an existing dome
important to the history of the Institute. This criterion is not applicable.
5. An applicant may not apply for Detailed Review if an amendment is pending.
Staff Finding:No amendments are pending for the subject property. Stafffinds this
criterion met.
Page 1 of 1
*63024*
Pitkin County Transaction #: 63024 Print Date:
Janice K. Vos Caudill Receipt #: 201405012 8/7/2014 3:07:37
Clerk and Recorder Cashier Date: 8/7/2014 3:07:36 PM PM
530 East Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611 (PNADON)
(970) 429-2707
www.PitkinClerk.org
('W`J0t1)el' Transaction Information Payment Summary
DateReceived: 08/07/2014
Source Code: Over the
Counter
(ASPCIT) ASPEN CITY OF Q Code: Mail Total Fees $21.00
ATTN CITY CLERK Return Code: Over the Total Payments $21.00
Counter y
Trans Type: Recording
Agent Ref
Num:
1 Payments
('III (JI 4689 $21.00
1 Recorded Items
BKPG: 0/0 Reception:612421 Date:8 1712014
3. .VN� 3:07:35 PM
INN", From: To:
Recording @ $11 for 1pg and $5 for 2 or more
pgs $1 Surcharge 3 $21.00
0 Search Items
0 Miscellaneous Items
file:///C:/Program%20Files/RecordingModule/default.htm 8/7/2014
wa
M
NEW
A
r
0
Hillary Seminick
From: Jim Curtis <jcurtis @sopris.net>
Sent: Thursday,July 31, 2014 7:25 AM
To: Hillary Seminick
Subject: Re:Al PD Amendment- Geodesic Dome
Height of Dome 20'-6", diameter is 42'-6". Thought you would enjoy these additional photos of"uncovered"
Dome circa early 1960"s. Let me know if you need anything else.
PS - Curiosity Question- Tents being set-up in Rio Grande park? For Pro Challenge Bike Race? For something
else?
1
I am planner assigned to thi_ id use case. Can you please provide the 1. ,ht of the dome?
Thanks!
Hillary
Hillary Seminick
Planner Technician
Community Development Department
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
970-429-2741
www.aspenpitkin.com
Notice and Disclaimer:
This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential
and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient,please reply to the sender that you
have received the message in error and then delete it. Further,the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in
nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable,the information and opinions contain in the email are based on
current zoning,which is subject to change in the future,and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The
opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance.
3
JUL 2 2 2014
CITY CAN ASPE,'
ASPEN INSTITUTE PROPERTY '' '
BUCKMINISTER FULLER GEODESIC DOME
INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT APPLICATION
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT
Aspen Institute Property
845 Meadows Road
Lot 1-13, Aspen Meadows Subdivision
Parcel # 273512129809
Submitted To: Jennifer Phelan
City of Aspen Community Development Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
970-429-2759
Owner/Applicant: The Aspen Institute
c/o Amy Margerum Berg
Executive Vice-President
1000 North Third Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
970-544-7906
Architect: n/a
Planner: Mr. Jim Curtis
Curtis & Associates
300 East Hyman Avenue, 2nd. Fl.
Aspen, Colorado 81611
970-319-0442
Date: July 22, 2014
BUCKMINISTER FULLER GEODESIC DOME
RESTORATION AND RELOCATION
I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
This application is for the following: Code Section
1. Common Development Review Procedure 26.304
2. Planned Development 26.445
3. Planned Development Insubstantial Amendment 26.445.110A
This application is illustrated by the drawings outlined below and inserted
following the text of the application.
1. Existing Conditions & Context Plan
2. Geodesic Domes Photographs
Outlined below are the application items we discussed at our January 17
Meeting with Chris Bendon and Jennifer Phelan.
A. BUCKMINSTER FULLER GEODESIC DOME RESTORATION
At the January 17 meeting, the Applicant was asked to document the
restoration and relocation of the Buckminster Fuller Geodesic Dome shown on the
attached drawing and photographs. Based on the documentation and research of
the Applicant, a Fuller Dome was first erected on the Aspen Institute grounds circa
1952 as part of the International Design Conference Aspen. This dome was
disassembled after the conference and relocated to Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
Thereafter, a second dome was erected circa 1954/55 as a cover for a swimming
pool located south of the Meadows Reception Center as shown on the attached
drawing and photographs. The swimming pool dome originally had a canvas cover
that eventually collapsed due to snow and wind problems, and was replaced with
1
an open frame dome without a cover, circa 1960's. The open frame dome was later
removed from the swimming pool in approx. 1992, and the swimming pool was
filled-in because it was in major disrepair, was on a property no longer owned by
the Institute, and the Institute was constructing a pool at the Health Center to
replace this swimming pool. So, in approx. 1992, the open frame dome was
relocated to an area south of the Crown & Arco Lodge Buildings and the frame
was in partial disrepair. It remained in this location until June 2011 when it was
restored and relocated to its present location east of Anderson Park as shown on
the attached drawing and photographs. There is a walkway path to the dome along
the eastern edge of Anderson Park. The dome was restored and relocated to this
location because it was a relatively hidden generally flat "pocket" surrounded by
trees and very private. The site required modest grading to level and set the dome,
and no trees were removed to set the dome. The site is very private, like a private
retreat, for reflection and small group activities. The dome is only used in the
summer and has no heat, no electricity, and a crusher fines floor. Located nearby
is an exterior electric box that can be accessed if needed for small receptions, team
building activities and/or small meeting discussions. During the summer activities,
fire extinguishers are installed and maintained in the dome. The dome has been
used sparingly to date for the smaller more private activities mentioned above.
II. COMMON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE,
CODE SECTION 26.304
Applicant understands and agrees to the Common Development Procedures set
forth in Code Section 26.304 and the Pre-Application Conference Summary.
III. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT,
CODE SECTION 26.445
In the 1980's the Aspen Meadows Property was designated a Specially Plan
Area (SPA) under the City of Aspen zoning. In 1991/1992, under City Council
Ordinance #14 (Series 199 1) and "The Aspen Meadows" Specially Plan Area
Development & Subdivision Agreement (Reception #340937), the City approved
an updated SPA Plan for the property. Subsequently, the City changed the
Specially Plan Area (SPA) zoning designation and nomenclature to Planned
Development (PD). Therefore, this application is being reviewed as an
Insubstantial Amendment to the approved 1991/1992 SPA Plan under the Planned
Development provisions of the Municipal Code.
2
IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT,
CODE SECTION 26.445.110A
The criteria for an insubstantial amendment are addressed below as set forth in
Code Section 26.445.110A.
1. The request does not change the use or character of the development.
Applicant feels the proposed amendment does not change the use or character of
the development. Domes and tent structures have been an important part of the
Aspen Institute history since its founding in 1949. Restoring the dome is
preserving and highlighting this long history.
2. The request is consistent with the conditions and representations in the
project's original approval, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change.
Applicant feels the proposed amendment is consistent with the original approval
(and Institute's history) as noted above. Even though the 1992 SPA Development
Plan does not specifically mention domes or tents, these types of structures have
been part of the Institute's history since its founding.
3. The request does not require granting a variation from the project's allowed
uses) and does not request an increase in the allowed height or floor area.
Applicant feels the proposed amendment does not require a variance from the
project's allowed uses and does not request an increase in the allowed heights or
floor area.
4. Any proposed changes to the approved dimensional requirements are limited to
a technical nature, respond to a design parameter that could not have been
foreseen during the Project Review approval, are within dimensional tolerances
stated in the Project Review, or otherwise represents an insubstantial change.
Applicant feels the proposed amendment does not change the dimensional
requirements of the project; are consistent with the original approval (and
Institute's history); and is an insubstantial change helping to preserve the history of
the Aspen Institute.
5. An applicant may not apply for a Detailed Review if an amendment is pending.
Not applicable.
3
V. EXHIBITS
Exhibit A - Owner's Consent & Authorization Letter
Exhibit B - Proof of Ownership
Exhibit C - Land Use Application Form
Exhibit D - Dimensional Requirement Form
Exhibit E - Signed Fee Agreement
Exhibit F - Pre-Application Conference Summary
4
Exhibit A
July 14, 2014
Ms.Jennifer Phelan
Community Development Office
City of Aspen
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Owner's Authorization and Consent
Aspen Institute Property
Buckminister Fuller Geodesic Dome Insubstantial Amendment
Planned Development (PD) Insubstantial Amendments Application
Planned Development (formerly Specially Plan Area)
Dear Jennifer,
I herby authorize and consent to the filing of the above reference Land Use
Application.Jim Curtis and Jud Hawk are authorized to represent the application.
Re ctfull
l
A Margerum B. 'rg
cutive Vice r sident
e Aspen In ti to
Aspen Institute Property
845 Meadows Road
Lot 1-13,Aspen Meadows Subdivision
Parcel# 273512129809
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Homeowner Association Compliance Policy
All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association
Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies
with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by
the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner.
Property Name:
Owner("I"): Email: 0T ,y n Phone No.: IV- ��,
Address
Property:
(subject of
application)
I certify as follows: (pick one)
LM'as This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant.
❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the
improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners
association or covenant beneficiary.
❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the
improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners
association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached.
I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the
applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I
understand that this document is a publi document.
Owner signature: '�Iyn &rshb date:
Owner printed name:
or,
Attorney signature: date:
Attorney printed name:
Pitkin County Assessor Exhibit B
Parcel Detail Information
Assessor Prow Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search
Clerk&Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tar Search Search
GIS Man I GIS Heln
Basic Buildine Characteristics I Value Summary
Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Owner Detail I 1_,and Detail I Photographs
Tax Area Account Number I Parcel Number I Property Typ—ej 2013 Mill Levy
001 R014028 273512129809 1 DPT EXEMFFI 32.843
Primary Owner Name and Address
SPEN INSTITUTE INC
1000 N THIRD ST
SPEN,CO 81611
Additional Owner Detail
Business Name
SPEN INSTITUTE-AUDITORIUM&FACILITY
Legal Description
Subdivision:ASPEN MEADOWS Lot: l-B ACADEMIC FACILITY&
AUDITORIUM
Location
Physical Address: 1000 N THIRD ST ASPEN
Subdivision: SPEN MEADOWS
Land Acres:
Land Sq Ft: 10
2014 Property Value Summary
I — F Actual Value Assessed Value
Land: F 0 0
I Improvements: �— 250,0001 — 72,500
)f 2 7/22/14 9:59 AN
407002 _ —�./i. \ T
407003
'�'♦ ;;�\ `\V 106003
J� .370°4 -•',..\ �\
10785,
3 { ltirLinReserve Pit kin Res a 407005 � ��• '�
udee 2 ' a 0 407006
10 008
0.
1000
pen Meadows '
1
231003
129003
plit -
284002
234001 �- _
z3s Os - ts93U9 04
201 a
As me
201(02'\
Ben Dean Split
ob
235006. i% r 4
I_
2920 , 1 �;�_ 10
Pi Hb 1 6
0 2 'ado ROW
Baar ;' �` 7040
203/��,",.!`,\/j j r, " 129602
/ F'.•f` �� Masir r4ssociatei oL Aspen
7y03 104,
204
E,�
203004•,
�• ` 2 - — -- Y --
ih@ 0' sl
20005
040ur� •', ,
g\+ a 900; - 1290
�,�� 21301 � 1 r \ 7 ==c.=.a_a � •_-'.
2730 z 129006 As nCenfO ! Physics
.`�\W V 37005'_`-`'4 Opp 129005
,
205002
T �` n0
r' 205001 2g 07 -` ` 129004
31 '� GiLIESPIEA VE L
--r-
lull
1 7'
0 _ 20 112 7211 � ``700 11 s p 3?1
re) 20 ccp
. Exhibit C
PROJECT: ATTACHMENT 2—LAND USE APPLICATION
Name:
Location: +
Parcel ID# UIRED Indicate street address lot&block mimber,legal escri tion where appropriate)
APPLICANT:
Name:
Address:
Phone#:
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name: m
Address:
Phone#: r
TYPE OF APPLICATION:(please check all that apply):
❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD
❑ Temporary Use
❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment
❑ Text/Map Amendment
❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA
❑ ESA-8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA
Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment)
Mountain View Plane
❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split
❑ Small Lodge Conversion/
,,Expansion
❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment (9/ ther:
❑ Conditional Use d vew
EXI ING CO ON descn of existin u'd s uses, evio r ls,etc.
PROP SAL: esari tion o sed buildin s, es,mo ' 'ons,et ft
Have you ttac ed the following? FEES DUE:$
L j Application Conference Summary
_/ltachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement
[� esponse to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form
❑ Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards
3-1)Model for large project
All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text
(Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an
electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model.
Exhibit D
ATTACHMENT 3
DIME QUIREM NT FORM
Project: P/✓� Y rN l
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Are a:
(for'De p oses 4f calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed:
Number of residential units: Existing. Proposed:
Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed.•
Proposed%of demolition(Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed.-_
Principal bldg,height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed.
Access.bldg.height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed:
On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed.
%Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed.•
Open Space: Existing: Required.• Proposed.
Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed.•
Rear Setback: Existing: Required:_proposed.•
Combined F/R: Existing: Required:_ proposed.-
Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed. A.
Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed.
Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed.
Distance Between Existing Required. Proposed.
Buildings
Existing non-conformities or encroachments:
Variations requested:
Exhibit E
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agreement for Payment Qf Citv of As en DJAODkent Ainthicationfeaq
CITY OF ASPEN(hereinafter CITY)and
(hereinafter APPLICANT)AGREE AS FOLLOW9.
1. APPLI I lyc
(hcreinaftcr,THEPROJECTJ (J
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land
Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application
completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size,nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration,unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of$ which is for_ hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit,APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above,including post approval review at a rate of$245.00
per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing,and
in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT
By: By:
Chris Bendon
Community Development Director Date:
Billing A t T ho Nu r:
VW I
000 ,
1�! Exhibit F
CITY't ASPEN
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Justin Barker DATE:5/30/14
PROJECT: Aspen Institute, Planned Development(formerly Specially Planned Area)
REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis
REQUEST: Insubstantial Planned Development Amendment
DESCRIPTION:
Buckminister Fuller's first Geodesic Dome was constructed at the Aspen Institute in 1952 as part of the International Design
Conference. Over the years,several iterations&locations of Fuller Domes have occurred at the Aspen Insttute. In 2011 the
Aspen Institute restored the remaining Fuller Dome which was in disrepair&last erected in 1992.The restored Dome was
relocated to the east side of Anderson Park and is used for small Institute gatherings in the summer.The restored Dcme is not
heated&is only used in the summer.The applicant should include a summary of the process of relocation for the dome,
including grading, landscaping and possible tree removal.The restoration and relocation of the Dome is considered an
Insubstantial change to the site specific plan and can be approved administratively.
Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience:
Land Use App:
httq://www.asoenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%2OFees/2013%201and%20use%20app%20form p
df
Land Use Code:
httq://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPlanning and Zoning/Title 26 Land Use Code/
Relevant Land Use Code Section(s):
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.445 Planned Development
26.445.110.A Insubstantial Amendments
Review by: Staff for completeness.
Review agencies for compliance.
Public Hearing: None.
Neighborhood Outreach: Not required.
Planning Fees: $1,300 deposit for 4 hours of staff time. Any unbilled portion of this deposit will be refunded at the
conclusion of the case. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at$325 per hour.
Referrals: None.
Total Deposit: $1,300
ASLU
PD Amendment
1000 N. Third St.
2735-121-29-809
1
To apply, submit the following inform ion:
• Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement.
• Pre-application Conference Summary(this document).
• Total deposit for review of the application.
❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a
current (no older than_a_months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance
report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property,
and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and
demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application.
❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name,
address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.
❑ A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the
current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado.
❑ HOA Compliance form (Attached)
❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed
development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application.
❑ Written responses to all review criteria.
❑ Summary of the process of relocation for the dome, including grading, landscaping and possible tree removal.
❑ An 8112" by 11"vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
❑ 2 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings.
❑ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current
zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The
summary does not create a legal or vested right.
2
M
�(j,11( /'•r \�i'J � 'r Pe°�:.' .. �-�� ����,e�� � .=T�l�" � ,,c rte\ L
;�_:, 111\.\1� ��,�.t .-,�� •� _. � lj� �li��� .. ..- =��r
ilk
—k"Z, �X;l 71, 00
\•
L
\�\ C� \,'r��,Ii � •) �� j\ fin.
\
illll-�
a.
�ti .•fir T7 ,ear '"'� � �� (' I j"!� Y: .. ,-•��LL
V.n
e �
y
k
t7
DOME - INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE CIRCA 1952 DOME OVER POOL CIRCA 1954/55
BUCKMINSTER FULLER GEODESIC DOME HISTORY
ERECTING DOME OVER POOL CIRCA 1954/55 DOME OVER POOL CIRCA 1954/55
1
Af
DOME OVER POOL CIRCA 1960's -1992 UNCOVERED DOME FRAME SOUTH OF LODGE BUILDINGS 1992-2011
BUCKMINSTER FULLER GEODESIC DOME HISTORY
a.
On
�:iL � ,� X � r• ,' {T�,�' � Y.� s it na,M1 `''�tS1q t
ENTRY SIDE OF RESTORED DOME 2011 SOUTH SIDE OF RESTORED DOME 2011
t _L
INTERIOR OF RESTORED DOME 2011 INTERIOR OF RESTORED DOME 2011
BUCKMINSTER FULLER GEODESIC DOME HISTORY
THE CITY OF ASPEN
Land Use Application
Determination of Completeness
Date: July 22, 2014
Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant,
We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number
and name assigned to this property is 0060 2014 ASLU- Aspen Meadows - Insubstantial PD
Amendment Hillary Seminick will be the planner for the land use case.
❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete:
Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your
application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed
above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the
land use application.
Your Land Use Application is complete:
If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete
to begin the land use review process.
Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by
the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any
questions.
Thank You,
AAA
fifer h lan, Deputy Planning Director
City of en, Community Development Department
A lications:
For Office Use Only: Qualifying PP
Mineral Rights Notice Required New SPA New PUD
Yes No�_ Subdivision, SPA, or PUD(creating more than 1 additional
lot)
GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing
Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging