The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.City Wide.HP-1975-10CE>sâ‚¬-2 ~P-1475,03 674/ Gv , d-Â·46 UVERLAY DISTRICT .. 5 (12-49 7 - 1-/ C J ~fe 1 s /2-6 ~202 -22 Box H 2-40 - 3. L SAMPLE LETTER (Name and Address) Dear . The Aspen Historic Preservation Committee is considering the designation of the West End of Aspen as an Historic District. More specifically, they are considering the designation of All that area within the City of Aspen bounded on the West by Castle Creek, on the North by the Roaring Fork River, on the East by Mill Street, and on the South by Highway 82 as an historic district pursuant to the provisions of Section 24-9.1 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Our ordinance requires that our Committee contact all owners of property within an area proposed for designation to state the reasons for and effects of such designation, and to obtain consent for the designation by the owners, if possible. Incorporated in this mailing is a letter from the Committee giving its reasoning in support of the dis- trict, a memorandum from the City Attorney outlining the effects of historic designation, and a consent form which we submit for your signature. Please return the latter to the Office of the City Clerk, P.O. .30x V, Aspen, Colorado 81611, if acceptable. The Committee will next present its findings on desirability of the creation of the district to the Planning and Zoning Commission for its preliminary approval before continuing with the designation procedure. If it receives preliminary approval, the Commission will set a date and time for a joint Planning and Zoning Commission and Historic Preservation Committee meeting which we will notify you about by mail. Thanking you for your anticipated cooperation, I am Very truly yours, Chairman Historic Preservation Committee CRITERIA u Historic Preservation Cornittee 1. New construction or remodeling shall not extend for more than three town lots (90' x 100') without an al.teration of at least 8 feet in the front setback line of the building facade which is parallel to the alley. Building roofs of new construction or remodeling shall not exceed three town lots without an alteration in the form and/or height as it relates to the front setback. These roofs shall be flat, gabled or hip. Established local historic variation shall be reviewed. 2. Exposed side and. rear elevations shall be of identical materials as the front facade or of a: color or material analogous to the front facade. Any street or mall facade shall be considered a front facade. Building materials other than brick, cut stone or clap- board siding shall be of a nature and texture not to ~ detract from the significance and character of the historic buildings within the district. Â· HIP or gabled roofs shall be standing rib sheet metal, wood of composition shingles, or suitable facsimile thereof. Other matbrials shall be reviewwd by the HPC. 3. Fenestrations above the first floor shall be greater in vertical dimensions than horizontal. Building details, if used, shall be oriented to fenestrations, corners, roof lines and at floor levels. 4. No new construction or remodeling shall have exposed structural skeletal elements other than load bearing walls. 5. Porches and stoops shall not exceed 20 feet along any facade. Balconies shall not project beyond the building facade. 6. Painted front facades shall not exceed 90 feet without a color or textured alteration. 7. Colors, values, intensity and color placement, being considered a valid controversial artistic embellishment and having an intimate relationship to all the foregoing criteria, shall be subject to review by the H.P.C. - To: The Members of the Historic Preservation Committee *CH Ir From: Russell A. Pielstick, A.I.A. ~A+1 You have requested imput from the Architects of Aspen on the criteria you have established for buildings in the Proposed Historic Overlay District--p district which will include all of the commercial Core of the City of Aspen. This is in response to that request. You are, in essence, asking me to choose a method by which I would wish to be executed, without asking first if I have a desire to be executed at all. I have no desire to discuss criteria for administration of an ordinance which, I feel, is unnecessary, counter productive, and at the very least myopic. If I should submit to discussion of your criteria, I would be tacitly accepting your basic concepts and your premises. I refuse to do that. You are asking me to answer what is known in logic as the "Complex Question", one of the Fallacies of Presumption. That is, your question covertly presumes a set of premises which have not been established, may not be true, and with which I do not agree. You are asking a question analogous to the classic interrogatory-- "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Let me show you the difference. Augustine Birrell said, "History is a pageant, not a philosophy." I feel that history is a continuum. The past is that part of the continuum which has already occurred. History is not created by people or historians. It is created by time. As time passes, history pours out behind it like the vapor trail from a jet plane. History cannot be frozen, any more than time can be stopped. The vapor trail of a plane when turned off means that the plane can't fly. However, if history is stopped, time goes on, but there is just no more history. To record and look at history and preserve some of the past is surely valid. It is valid because that which is preserved becomes a present evidence of times which are past. It is also valid because we need a foundation on which to stand, so that we may see more clearly into the future and may better understand where we are in the continuum of time. To recreate the past is false. To build today in an esthetic that was geniune yesterday, diminishes the authenticity of history's contributions , Â£ /-9 9*-Z 2,>4= To strive only for eclectic repetition of past glories is to deprive future history of the best that our time can contribute to the continuum. It is allowing the creative impulse of people of this time to be shut-off in deference to the creativity of the past. It means that the history of this generation will only be a stale mutation born from the history of our forefathers. I believe that there is no generation from the past which is as well equipped to provide the esthetic values which are fitting for our time as the generation which is here now. I personally am insulted by the attempt by this committee-to get me to answer these criteria. It seems to me that the questions you are really asking are these: 1. "Which ones of these 19th Century values are you willing to establish as constraints on the last quarter of the 20th Century?" My answer is "None. I would much prefer the freedom to attempt to find values which will be heralded in the 2lst Century." 2. "What elements of esthetic composition from 100 years ago are better than what you can come up with today?" My answer is , " None". 3. "Why is it that we of the Historic Preservation Committee have so much more sensitivity to good design, have so much more ability to know what is compatible with the old, and are filled with so 11 much more insight into what makes a good community, than you are? My anser is, "You don't". As far as I'm concerned, you should limit your. committee's actions to the preservation of that which is good and meaningful from the past. My feeling is that this ordinance represents unnecessary law passing for the sake of law passing and for no other purpose. It is hypocrisy to say you are for the preservation of history and then to be instrumental in passing an ordinance which would deny the future a history worth preserving. I would urge you to drop this ridiculous attempt to legislate good design, pleasing commiinity environment, and methodical beauty. .5" CITY Â·'* -TA SPER aspen ,COR 11... 0, 0211 box v May 7, 1975 Mr. Bill Kirwin $ Box Q Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Historic Designation of the West End Area of Aspen Dear Mr. Kirwin: Regarding the request of the WSIA submitted to the Historic Preservation Committee requesting ,investigation of the possibility of establishing an H, Historic Overlay District for the West End area of Aspen. Enclosed are outlines of the necessary procedures. For the purpose of the Historic Preservation Committee review of this project we will have to establish the Historic Significance of the area. This means we will have to present proof to the Planning and Zoning Commission that the area meets the Standards for Designation as outlined under Section 24-9.3 of the Zoning Code. For the West End these standards seem to be best met by A (1) (4), B (1) (2) (4), C (2). The Historic Preservation Committee does not have the personnel or the time to research all of the buildings in the proposed area. For this purpose we suggest that you form a committee within your group to do the research or have each individual property owner do their own research as an abstract is one of the best sources of information. The Historical Society helped the HPC with th research for the downtown core area, they may be able to help with your group. Note on the documenting form the Remarks area, visual descriptions, notable features, etc. will be very important for this project for in the past we have discovered there is very little recorded history available on houses in the West End. Also please note, we must have the exact legal description and the street address of the property. All proper street addresses are on file in the office of the Building Inspector if the proper address is unknown to the owner. Sincerely, Lary Groon, Chairman Historic Preservat-ion Committee CC: Max Freeman Bob Marsh Ramona Marka ias *'Hrin-Â·- - . .M.'VIC*,Â·rÂ· 1~ 1 - - - 1 1 A f , . 4 bm . MEMO TO SUSAN SMITII Tum %40.-1 9-ru ....01 + RE: HISTORIC DESIGNATION SUSAN The code requires that the following occur before we conduct the public hearing: 1. The committee must make an investigation of the proposed district. - 2. The HPC must then contact all the owners of property within the proposed district and secure their consent to the designation if possible. 3. The committee must pass a resolution stating their intention to establish a district and summarize their attempts at and success at acquiring the consent of the property owners. 4. The HPC must then present their findings to the P and Z at one of their regular meetings. 5. TheÂ·P and Z must give the concept preliminary approval. 6. If it receives preliminary approval, the P and Z then establishes a public hearing date. THE HPC DOES NOT SET THE DATE. 7. For the public hearing, fifteen days published notice AND EACH PROPERTY OWNER MUST ALSO BE NOTIFIED BY MAIL. Consequently, as you can sec their are many procedural requirements to be satisfied and I do not know if any have been satisfied to date. Please let me know. . f.Â·â€¢tyÂ· , -*4 *kiN.)- : -...... ...'. 11. . 1., -, * , "Â·1'â€¢rÂ¥-Â¥â€¢' .e-rte,1-" -1.7-NUP. 37=9-1'rÂ¥â€ž-' -'.cr'' -'-MPg1 -pi y. '4 d , , 41 1 . 4 , 1% . 2 â€¢ 1 V / i , â€ž Excerrt frcm tic Verinr. Code. Â·Â·Â·L; fr, r ..ic s i -r.t. i on r) f }I, Misti: ric C.verl ny Listrict. s. 24 -9.3 Rtind .. Â·r orÂ·ca.s tc b. inclucled within ,'e f-{ râ€¢1Â·,~,41 r'* â€¢,1 L. k L . 1. .. . ; ' Â· eVT.] LLâ‚¬-1,1 ;.IttÂ· 2 (.C rE,-t u-I . - -{ 4 /1 The Str'22 LUI'-r, 2 - 7.7.2 :la.- i - Pl C f sti"-icti_ircÂ·:, cite or c.rea: 1. 'ins c '- . :Â· :Â·,~i z t---r, j r, - e rÂ·Â·Â· 3 i o:' v.Â·: .1 ue as I-Â·:Â· :Â·t o f.' t. he d ., vc.1 0 y.,Â·.-' ent.., her itage, cultural ch:Â·.rac:Cristies of tne City of Aspen, the Sts.to of Colorado or the y. .1 T -1 '- rl â€¢ 2. Is the sire of no historic event with an effect upon society; 3. Is identified with a person or group of persons who haa some influence OL'U 1 -, 4,9 , 4. Exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social 02-historical heritage of the ccrmunity; 5. By its preservation, promotes the health, safety or welfare ofÂ· the present and future inhabitants of tbe community. B. Architectural Importance The structure or combination of structures; 1. Portrays the e..virot7 -,1 7- t of a crcun of people in an era of histcry characterired 4 a" a distinctive architectural style; 2. Embodies +ha distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type snecin.en; 3. Is the work of an architect or master builder whose individual work nas influenced the character of Aspen; t. 1 1 ./. I râ€¢ r 0 1 0-net c 4. Contains v......mve dots.il, materials or cia:rsmanship 61. -1.61 - represent a significant architectural style. C. Geographic I".portance The structure, comoination of J:ructures, site or area: 1 -0 _. r. ..4 -rc3 * 7 â€¢' A-1 n r n - nf . 1-,Clu. UJU U.1. .Cill(I .,C. . of or related toa square, park or other distinctive area should be developed or preserved acecrding to a plan based on an historic cultural or architectural motif; 2. Lue to its unioue locauion or singular physical characteriotics, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the city. 24-9.4 Procedure for designation of H, Historic Overlay uistricts. ,ihenever in the opinion of the Historic Preservation Cor:attee, a structure, 640:1 of structures, site or area meets the standards for Josh-nation of H, Historic L hÂ·erlay Districts, as act forth in Section 24-9.3, the distoric Preservation Corrittee shall contact the owner or owners of such structure, Combination of structures, site or area, outlining the reasons for and e:fects of designation as an H, Historic Overlay District, and if possible, shall secure the owner's written consent to such designation. Fell.owing t.his cont.act the Historic Preservation Committee may proceed by A. Stating the.t a prelimin: ry investicatien and review indicates t.hat the described structure, conbination of structures, site or aron is elicibl and has bren selected for designation ns an H, Mistoric Overlay Li-tri -0 ; B. Â°+ "ing either that the Listeric Precervaticn Cer:a.tee is in recÂ» . 0 .JU-- ..'. the O.:cr-Â· r' s writ ' en cosent to ..'Let desil-nation or why the Historic'. 1 re- se:'vation 'Cc::mit:ec feÂ·213 that it should p:'Dc,teÂ·'.1 without such cori.:unt. â€¢ â€¢3 The Hint. . 4 1 "9 n ' " O aervatien Cor,Grittee sh:.1.1. present its findim-3 Lo the t Pl.an rr n 7 .1 - 1 ..r, i r - r meeting of said Ce=:i.:-:siori for 0 .u....ission at a recula pre..ininary :i:Â·Trural 'Defore proce,dinr with the 0.3..li,nu 4-'--- 'Â·t.i (41 3-Toe I'Â·.lure . ..2,y' .1 .. F k. i 1 - 4 1 * l A f i h .-4 t*.. Â§ 24-9 ZONING Â§ 24-9.1 (1) All that space which is within the projection of a sector of 9Â° 54' 00" described by two radia, iines which bears 44Â° 49' 55" E and S 34Â° 55' 55" E respectively from the refer- ence point, and which is also above the view plane which passes through the reference base line at an inelination of 3Â° 30' above hori- zontal. (2) All that area which is within the projection of the following described perimeter and which is also above the view plane which passes Â£ through the reference base line at an inelina- tion of 3Â° 30' above horizontal. The perimeter ' is more fully described as follows : Beginning ~ at the reference point: Thence N 55Â° 04' 05" E a distance o.f 73.00 feet along the reference base line; thence S 34Â° 55' 55" E a distance of 418.27 feet to a point on the northerly racl- ial line of the view sector; thence N 44Â° 49' 55" W along said radial line a distance of 424.59 feet to the reference point. (Code 1962, Â§ 11-1-9; Ord. No. 14-1967, Â§Â§ 1, 2; Ord. No. 19-1967, Â§Â§ 6, 7; Ord. No. 20-1.907, Â§ 1; Oid. No. 21-1968, Â§ 4; Ord. No. 2-1971, Â§ 1; Ord. No. 9-1971, Â§ 2; Ord. No. 10-1971, Â§ 1; Ord. No. 25-1971, Â§3; Ord. No. 17-1973, Â§ 1; Ord. No. 13-1.973,Â§ 1) See. 24-9.1. H, Historic Overlay District. (a) Intention-to promote the educational, cultural, econo- mic ai.d general welfare of the public by preserving those qualities that relate to the history of the City of Aspen, the State of Colorado and the nation, it is deemed essential to provide for the preservation and continued existence of his- G . torie structures, combinations of structures, sites and areas within the city ami for the construction, reconstruction and remodeling of structures and combinations of structures, with- in legally designated H, Ilistoric Overlay Districts, compli- mentary to those iii existence within said H, Historic Over- lay Districts. Supp. No. 8 1516.1 ... I t Â§ 24-9.1 ASPEN CODE Â§ 24-9.1 (b) Applicability-the H, Historic Overlay District, shall be applied according to the provisions of this section and shall have the effect of superimposing the requirements of this section upon the structure, combination of structures, site or area so designated in additioii to the requirements of ' the zone district in existence at the time of H, Historic Over- lay District, designation. (c) Creation of the historic preservation committee-there shall be established an historic preservation committee with five (5) members appointed by the city council, with such powers and duties as are hereinafter prescribed which include in part: L t G I Supp. No. 8 1516.2 E I Â§ 24-9.1 ZONING Â§ 24-9.1 1. To make recommendations to the planning commission and ihe city council on the designation of H, Historic Overlay Districts, and to provide support material necessary to justify such designation ; 2. To review and render decisions on individual building â€¢ permit applications within H, Historic Overlay Dis- tricts. Cd) Staitdards for designatio* of H, Historic Overlay Dis- tricts--structures, combinations of structures, sites or areas . to be included within an H, Historic Overlay District, shall be evaluated and considered based on the following guidelines and standards: 1. Historical importalice I The structure, combination of structures, site of area: t a. IIas character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage, cultural characteristics of the City of Aspen, the State of Colorado or the nation; b. Is the site of an historic event with an effect upon society; c. Is identified with a person or group of persons who had some influence on society ; -- d. Exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, - social or historical heritage of the community ; e. By its preservation, promotes the health safety or welfare of the preseiit and future inhabitants of the community. 2. Architect?tral hnporta.nce The structure or combination of structures : a. Portrays the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style ; b. Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type specimen ; Supp. No. 3 1516.3 0 . Â§ 24-9.1 ASPEN CODE Â§ 24-9.1 c. Is the work of an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen; d. Contains elements of design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant archi- tectural style. 3. Geographic importance The structure, combination of structures, site of area : a. Because of being part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on an his- torie cultural or architectural motif ; b. Due to its unique location or singular physical characteristics, represents an established and f familiar visual feature of the city. 4- I \ le) Procedure for designation of If, Historic Overlay Dis- tricts 1. Initiation of procedure ~ Whenever in the opinion of the historic preservation . committee a structure, combination of structures, site or area meets the standards for designation of H, lib torie Overlay Districts, as set forth in subsection (d). Section [24-] 9.1 of Chapter 24, the historic preserva- tion committee shall contact the owner or owners of such structure, combination of structures, site or area, outlining the reasons for and effects of designation as an Ii, Historic Overlay District, and, if possible, shall secure the owner's written consent to such designation. a. Following this contact the historic preservation corninittee may proceed by officially adopting a resolution : (1) Stating that a pre]iminary investigation and review indicates that the described structure, C. combination of structures, site or area is eli- gible and has been selected for designation as an II, }Iistoric Overlay District; Supp. No. 3 1516.4 4 0 1 Â§ 24-9.1 ZONING Â§ 24-9.1 (2) Stating either that the historic preservation committee is in receipt of the owner's written consent to such designation or why the his- torie preservation committee feels that it sliould proceed without such consent. b. The historic preservation committee shall present 9 its findings to the planning and zoning commis- sion at a regular meeting of said commission for preliminary approval before proceeding with the designation procedure. 2. Prelimina.ry approval - plamting and zoning commission a. The planning and zoning commission in consider- ing preliminary approval shall evaluate the desig- nation proposal for application of H, Historic Overlay District, to structures, combinations of structures, sites or areas with respect to: (1) Its relationship to the Aspen Area General Plan; (2) The effect of designation upon the surround- ing neighborhood; (3) Such other planning considerations as may be relevant to the proposed designation. b. Designation proposals receiving preliminary ap.- proval shall be scheduled for a joint public hearing with the historic preservation committee and the planning and zoning commission at a time, date and place certain. Designation proposals not receiv- ing preliminary approval by the planning and zon- ing commission shall be terminated. 3. Joint hearing - historic preservatien committee aMd zoning commission Said joint public hearing to designate a structure, combination of structures, site or area as an H, His- G . torie Overlay District, shall be advertised and held as as outlined in Section [24-] 11 of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Supp. No. 3 1516.5 /1 0 $ Â§ 24-9.1 ASPEN CODE Â§ 24-9.1 a. During the joint public hearing the planning and zoning commission shall present its findings on the designation proposal with respect to: (1) Its relationship to the Aspen Area General . Plan; (2) The effect of designation upon the surround- ing neighborhood ; (3) Such other planning considerations as may be relevant to the proposed designation. b. TJie historic preservation committee shall present its findings with respect to historica], architectural and geographic importance as outlined in subsec- tion (d) Section [24-] 9.1 of Chapter 24 of the ; Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. e. The planning and zoning commission shall recom- .. 1, 1 mend approval, conditional approval or disapproval and the reasons therefor and shall submit said recomm?ndat.ions together with comments of the historic preservation commit:tee to the city council within thirty (30) days after the joint public hearing date. The recommendation of the planning and zoning commissioh shall include a request that Â· : Â·4 Â·the city council set the time, date and place for a public hearing on the proposed designation before the city council. 4. City couticil desigizatioyl hearing ' 3--; -The city councilÂ· shall set a public hearing within fif- : teen (15) days after receipt of the historic preserva- tion committee comments and the planning and zoning ; comn,ission recommendation on the proposal te desig- nate a structure, combination of structures, site or area , as an H, Historic Overlay District. The city council public hearing shall be held in accordance with the . provisions as outlined in Section [24-] 11 of Chapter , 24 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. H, Historic Overlay Districts, so designated by the city council will be classified for zoning purposes by the existing zone district designation at the time of adop- tion of this section plus the suffix "H". Supp. No. 3 1516.6 4 t ' Â§ 24-9.1 ZONING Â§ 24-9.1 5. Recordation of H, Historic Overlaw. District, designation, Within fifteen (15) days of the effective date of an amendment designating structures, combinations of . structures, sites or areas as H, Historic Overlay Dis- tricts, the historic preservation committee shall notify the city building inspector of the official designation. and the city clerk shall record among the real estate records of the clerk and recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, one of the followiiig: a. A certified copy of the amendment designating specified property within an Ii, Historic Overlay District, as a structure, combination of structures, site or area for preservation ; b. A notice stating that specified property has been placed within an H, Historic Overlay District, and designated as a structure, combination of strue- tures, site or area for preservation, and citing the amendment and effective date thereof which made the designation effe.ctive. The notice also may con- tain a brief summary of the effects of such desig- nation, as set forth ill this section. In addition, the zoning district map of the City of Aspen shall be amended to indicate specified property within an H, Historic Overlay District, as a structure, com- bination of structures, site or area for preservation by the addition of the suffix "H" to the property so designated by the appropriate amendment. Fail- ure to record such amendment or notice within the required time shall suspena the effective date of the designation until the recording has been made. (f) Procedure to amend or rescimi designation of H, His- torie Overla'U Districts-a structure, combination of struc- tures, site of area designated as an H, Historic Overlay Dis- trict,.may be amended or rescinded in the same manner as the original designation was made. , Supp. No, 3 1516.7 e t. Â§ 24-9.1 ASPEN CODE Â§ 24-9.1 (g) ProcedÂ·ure to authonze erection, removal, construction, reconstructio?0, remodeling or demolition of structures, com- bination of strÂ·uctures, sitcs or areas desigmlted as H, INs- toric Overlay Disty'icts, for preservation 1. Building permits shall not be issued for any of the following acts unless a determination has been made by the building inspector that no change to the ex- terior appearance of the structure or combination of structures will result or until the appropriate action . has been taken by the historic preservation committee based on the pre-application review and application . review provisions of this section. , a. Remodeling, reconstruction of, or addition to, the exterior architectural feature of any improvement I which constitutes all or part of a structure or com- -0 bination of structures, within an H, Historic Over- Â» lay District; b. Demolition or moving of any improvement which constitutes all or part of a structure or combina- tion of structures within an II, Historic Overlay District; c. Construction or erection of any improvement or addition to any improvement upon any site or area - included within an H, Historic Overlay District. 2. Pre-application rellieto Prior to the preparation of working drawings and specifications or calling for proposals or bids from con- tractors, the prospective property developers, owners or agents shall prepare preliminary scale diawings and outline specifications for review and informal discus- sion. Said preliminary scale drawings and outline specifications, together with such other information as may be required to enable an intelligent understand- . ing of the proposed work and a written request for the pre-application review, shall be submitted to the build- ing inspector. All documents submitted to the building inspector for these required reviews shall be in tripli- cate prepared in a form suitable for filing in a stan- Supp. No. 3 1516.8 41 e.,- Â§ 24-9.1 ZONING Â§ 24-9.1 dard size office filing cabinet. No exhibits need be sub- mitted with a request to move or demolish a structure or combination of structures. Should the building in- spector determine that preliminary scale drawings and â€¢ outline specifications demonstrate that no change to the exterior appearance of structures or combinations of structures will result, the building inspector may exempt the applicant from a pre-application review with the historic preservation committee and shall con- tinue to process the building permit in accordance with appropriate regulations. In cases where exterior changes will result, the building inspector shall notify the committee promptly of each pre-application re- ceived and shall set a meeting date for said pre- i application review. In cases of very minor repair pro- 1â€¢ jects the historic preservation committee, if prelimi- nary drawings and other data are sufficiently clear and explicit, may grant approval at the pre-application. stage and shall also advise the building inspector in writing. The building inspector shall continue to proc- ess the building permit iii accordance with appropriate regulations. 3. Application review In cases where approval is not given at the pre-applica- tion stage the following procedure shall apply. In proc- essing each application for a building permit, under the provisions of this section, the historic preservation committee shall hold at least one ( 1) public hearing, notice of the time and place of which shall be given at least fifteen (15) days in advance by publication in a newspaper having general circuladon in the City of Aspen. If the exhibits submitted for the pre-application review are deenied inadequate for holding a public hear- C. . ing and for forming a clear idea of the proposed work, the committee shall postpone action until adequate ex- hibits have been submitted. After such public hearing, the committee shall: a. Approve or approve with conditions, the building permit as it pertains to the provisions of this sec- Supp. No. 3 1516.9 . 4, Â§ 24-9.1 ASPEN CODE Â§ 24-9.1 tion. and shall so advise the building inspector in writing, and said building inspector shall then continue to process the application in accordance with appropriate regulations ; b. Disapprove the building permit applied for as it . pertains to this section, and so advise the building inspector and the city council in writing stating the reasons for such disapproval, and the building inspector shall deny the building permit. The appli- cant shall be notified of the committee's decision , within ten (10) days of the public hearing at which the application .was considered. Recommen- dations of approval, disapproval or conditional ap- proval shall be noted on the face of the application and signed by the chairman of the committee. No 1 permit for work within an .11, Historic Overlay K District, may be issued without the approval or I conditional approval of the historic preservation cornmitiee endorsed thereon except in cases ex- empted by the building inspector or granted by the historic preservation committee in the pre-applica- i,ion state or except after appeal as provided else- where in this section. (h) Criteria for approval, conditional approval, exception - histolic preservation committee 1. Approved The committee shall judge any proposed remodeling for the preservation of historical, architectural and charac- terist.'c qualities, and any new structure for compli- mentary design with adjacent designated structures, combinations of structures, sites or areas. In case of an application to raze, demolish or move a structure, judg- ment shall be niade on the basis of its historical and architectural importance, its importance as a part of the geographic area within which it is located, and the actual physical condition of the structure. 2. Conditio;-?al approval The committee may grant conditional approval at the pre-application review or application review stages on Supp. No. 3 1516.10 0 . Â§ 24-9.1 ZONING Â§ 24-9.1 the provision that changes related to exterior archi- tectural features recommended by said committee be made in proposed work. In such case, the building in- spector shall determine that the conditions of approval have been met and shall continue to process the build- ing permit in accordan. e with appropriate regulations. 3. ExceptionsÂ· The committee may recommend exceptions or waivers from the provisions of this section, provided such ex- ceptions do not damage the character of the H, Historic Overlay District, or the intent of this section, and are required to prevent an injury to the public welfare. The recommendation for exception, after approval by the committee, shall be forwarded to the city planning I commission for review and recommendation and then .\. submitted to t.he city council and if approved by it, r the building irjspector may issue R permit therefor if said application is in accordance with additional appro- priate regulations riot covered in this section. (i) Appeal procedure-appeals from any decision or de- termination made by the historic preservation committee must be taken to the appropriate court within sixty (60) days after the date of such decision. li) Role of board of adjustment-the board of adjustment shall not act on any variance or exception pertaining to prop- erty within an H, Historic Overlay District, without first con- sulting and obtaining the written report of the historic pres- ervation committee. No appeal shall lie to the board of adjust- ment from any of the decisions of the historic preservation cominittee. Ck) Remedying dangerous conditions-in any case where the building inspector, health officer, fire department or any other duly authorized officer or agency of the City of Aspen . shall order or direct the construction, reconstruction, remodel- ing, repair or demolition of any improvement or any other necessary action to a structure, combination of structures, site or area designated as an H, IIisto]ie Overlay District, for the purpose of remedying conditions by said agencies to be im- Supp. No. 3 1516.11 . '. Â§ 24-9.1 ASPEN CODE Â§ 24-9.1 mediately dangerous to life, health or property, nothing con- tained in this section shall be construed as making it a viola- tion of this section for any person to comply with such order or directive without receipt of a statement from the committee. Any such department, agency or officer shall give the coin- mittee as early notice as practicable of the proposed or actual issuance of any such order or directive. ( 1) Violation and remedies-wherever, by the provisions of this section, the performance of any act is required or the commission of any act is prohibited, a failure to coinply shall constitute a violation of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen and shall be subject to tile provi- sions of Section 24-14 of said Code. , i (m) Definitions k k 1. Remodeling Any act or process which changes one or more of the exterior architectural features of a structure, combina- tion of structures, site or area designated as an H, Historic Overiay District. 8 2. II, Historic Oveility District J Any structure or improvement and its surrounding environs, a group or combination of structures or im- provements and their surrounding environs, sites or areas and their surrounding environs designated for preservation as an H, Historic Overlay District, under the provisions of this section. 3. Exterior architectural feature The architectural style, design, general arrangement and components of all the outer surfaces of a structure or improvement, including but not limited to the tex- ture and materials, and to the type and style of all windows, lights, signs and other fixtures appurtenant to said structure or improvement. 4. Imptovement Any building, structure, place, work of art or other ob- -jeet constituting a physical betterment of real property or anir part of such betterment. (Ord. No. 5-1972, Â§ 2) Amendmenf note--Ord. No. 5-1972, Â§ 2, added Â§ 24-9.1. Supp. No. 3 1516.12 2. I. Pm: 1 nf 8 nT,407 70 Lot K; w. + Ff L carl & ratherine Borgman F Rnv 1 1< C 1. 2 0 2 Aspen Lot e. 1 of L; M Mt. States ComEiirentiOn T i.:, / 42 J 2 i i Bnx E A er.or Lot e. 20' of N; O thru S Johr Gilmore ROY J A enrtÂ·n BLOCK 80 44 30+ At w. -1 of B Lena Van Loom B.x 434 Aspen C.. ic + 0. 3 0 f G ; 'D ; G; H; I Sven Elisha Bo J 0 59 A S - -- 1 n Lot F ; 17 7 0 -4 3 -R O r,7 rrea n 2/ BO- 136 5 8 c: Â·Â·Â·.0 n .of "i WilliRm & 1710-enne Bea,) mont 00<7 9. Pleasant :ve. Chicago, Ill. 60620 K, Â·-/A g A i s . 0 i 2-4.4.4,Â¢J n o n 1-rio .' 0=-1,0. 4- - 1 ..2..Â«61.,4 -7 6 c-36 -7 9 4- R f : M Ponthy Kelleher Box I 4 5 n / P - b v P n.nnf, t D.r~n,yorn.L $ rf 1.-, â€¢-Â·~ e A n ..Av 1/?9 be/-,7 ~ Int P; Qi R; S W -1 r n W'- 1 + r, 7.-O,1--4 nk *A . 0+ - + 1 -TÂ·' CIL.-4.nhc" 1-1 4- PrÂ·IN l a ~ P B 1 r , 0 1 0 0 -2 Page 2 of 8 R'Prv 81 Modn"" UnthrA norpe 1 Hed .J .. N Â· AlÂ·.41 Â« ..0 Box A 8.suen U 4 -4-'â€žB . . 1 1 9 /. -1 3.14 â€ž.1-- p-v 'An * f. 9/ t -1 T n + D t 1-"u T . 1 ..... 'Il. t. T ~ . = C 1.- otÂ·: 4... Pl '7 - L., 0 plor-, Lot K; L C rrmtn 1 p- 1 5 7 B r n ,Â·' r. BAY 70 Aspen. TF+ M. D William R. chaw Rev <10 A enr,n Tnt Nl 0 Prhe-+ ShgwiEst. Rox 510 4 Spon Lot Q D A 74, r C W e,f. r r. V 41 n , 4 1 AprÂ·,n Lot R; S Cjtv of Asnon Br,v V Aspen BTric,1< 82 Lot A:B; C; D p y. 0 7 rect OrÂ· T-O .1 -O T 'v'. Pox 3296 Aspen Lot E; F; G V i y. rr i r' i r. 1-, r, f.. HÂ·Â·Â·-941 t< E N R f Box 179 Aspen Lot H; I Dr P obort Py: r-?.rd Box I I To + K thâ€ž.1 56 Pi .kin County Boy T A /â‚¬ S r râ€¢ n 2, + page 3 of 8 P.Tant, 11 I:0+ A thru S Dituln. COUrty ' Box I Aspen BLOCK 86 Lot K; w. f of L Roy Vroom Box TT Asnen Lot e. f of L: M thru S Firp,+ Aspen Corn. BOX 3318 Aspen BT,OCK 87 Lot A; B; C Prect & Wilma Martens Box 612 Aspen T,ot n George Parrv Box 177 Asper Lot E thru I Conlinental Oil Company 1755 Glennrm Place Denver, Colo. 80202 Lot K thru N James Parson 4 Box 483 Aspen Lot O thru R City of Aspen . Box V 4 Aspen I,ot S Harold Rowland Bo-â‚¬ 502 A spen Page 4 of 8 - n <n~v 88 Lo* e. po. of A; s. 20' of B; AlleFandro F,bbo+injR pt. S. 20' of C: B. 7, of C.; Env <70 w. 5, of D; s. 20' cf D Aspen Lot n* 80' of A: c Rn, of B; 4 snen Tunber & Sur-1 v n. 80' RnX 13 A DE, 0 Roswoll, New Mexico 88201 Lot n eyrAnt s. PO': F except Kirt & EnttoÂ· BreÂ·FrÂ·nte 9. 20'; F nxcept s. 20' Br,v 90 Asn,n Le, + e 8 0 n . . r 17 5 19 m r - Â°prd v Box 1065 Asnen Lot C ; H; I Harley Baldwin A n. S ZO S 9 T A -6 V A J V L Hnrhe"+ 74+ell reÂ·,Â·.- 041 1 . 9 , -9 /3.. 2. 14 4 0110 Chicege, Ill. 60690 Marv 61**144 HELEN 6,4 /7.7 L C Lot L 4 Box 57 A spon Int M (nart) Adolph & Grace L. â€¢ 1 - ' 1 4 klich Box 1127 Aspen Lot M (part); N ,/Hampel, Ferguson & Hunter t 1801 Sombrern Blvd. Marathon, Florida Lot 0 Punaws,7, Kern & Vicenzi Box 389 Asnen Lot P L. Fr'rryu,on & W. Hampel 1/ 1 8 1 1 12 0 -hr .s V. o R.1 1, d Marathon, Ploridn Lot Q T.orry vervilion *4 1901 eombrpro Blvd. Marathon, Flerian Pa r, 5 of 8 BTOrr 88 rent. Lot e. 75' of P; F.e. 75' of S Woole, Ransom & Jurtino P S CPI Box BAPO San Francirco, 07110. 04557 TR+ n. 75' nf R: n. 25' of S Robert Sproull Box 3272 Aspen BT OCK 89 Lot n. 66' of A Lindor Incorp. Box 1126 Aspen Lot s. 44' of A; s. 34' of B Patrick Henry Sports. Ltd. Box 1311 A FE Den Lot n. 66' of B Amelia Kopp & Co. Box 100 Aspen Lot w. 16' of C Police Pas+ry Shor Inc. Box 332 Aspen Lot eÂ® 14' cf C Anceline & Roy Griffith 312 We 23rd. Pueblo, Colo, 81003 Lot D '2 4 G r GLC r.nprpri ses, Inc BOX 5373 42 -1- Aspon Lot D (part); E (part) Roaring Fork Cond. â‚¬ Roaring Fork Asso. Box 1103 Aspen Lot Firart)1 F; G (rart) Roaring Fork Arms Cond. Box 1103 Aernn Lot e. 6' of G; H; I n r... U, 1 rÂ· i r h , r A Jo mer (1 - x Bor 2630 Aspen Page 6 of 8 U T nO V 89 C.RIAL- let M; L (re:rt) ,< r,h r' rt Ir '.i '' r r.1 Route 2 Stove, vt. 05672 Lot L (part}; M aspen Sports Inc. Box U Aspen Red Cnion, Tne. Lot N; 0; P Box 466 Aspen o. R; S Bert Pilwell Lot .., Irvestment Corn. Box 567 BLOCK 00 Asnen Lot A (part); B (part); Aspen Skiing Corp. Box 1248 C (part) D CÂ· 1 Â· an A" ,4 Lot A (part; B (part): Bavlv Manuf. Ce. . C (part) 1845 Sherman Street Suite 404 rn"ver, cn, 0. 80203 Lot E: F; G; w. 10' of Hi Guidn Miyer e. 20' of Hi I Box 1790 Aspen Lot K thru S City of Aspen t. Box v Aspen BI,OCK 92 Lot K thru P Pittin County V Box I Aspen T,ot Q Helen Moore % Roy . Reid & Cliff Frelsford Box 496 A snen Lot R; w. 74' of S 0 0 7' 3 1 d , rt e V n g n r? 1 1Â¥' & Ke n 13 :3 ker PBY LLOY R : * r: r' Lot r. 9 91 0 &9 9 Fl 4 7 ehet h Callahan & Louis 3 , r-on.c .3 Box 204 h 8 7 n n paF 7 of 8 BLOCK 93 Tot A thru T St. Mn rv' s Cathnlic ChrreD Box 260 A ov en Lot k thru 01 w. 12*' of P City of Aspen , Box V Aspen Lot 171' of P; Q; R: S Milton Conner Box 159 Aspen RIPCK 94 Lot A Bullocks of Aspen Grand AvrÂ·nun Box 609 Glenwood Springs, Colo. 81.601 Lot B; C Hopkins Street Tnvestment Co. !*D ~N_ C.> 4)/i â‚¬24.,12 (<70-U'~ 71 1.1~-1 ' , 9 jG DC 1 4,32 0 1 U Lot D; E: F James Parsons . Box 481 - Aspen Lot G; H; It O thru S Grant & Co. Box 566 Aspen Lot K; L; M BPOR Elks Box 327 Aspen Lot N Walter & Helen Stroud Box 627 Aspen AT,07.k- O 4 T,0+ A thrit D Arron Arcade On. 4 Foremus Fleisher Rox N) Aspen Page 8 ef 8 4 RLOCK 95 rent. Lot E Richard Fitz#yerald 6 Nick Oust Box 3796 Asven I,0 + F Thomas Benton Box 1561 Arreg Lot G; Hi I Dingiljpn & Dikran, A.S. 160-w. 725 st. New York, New York 10463 Lot s. 68' of K; L (part) Ruscell Volk 1135 Petroleum Club Bldg. , Denver, Colorado 80202 r ' 2 Wain7 Lot e. 18" & se 68" of L; Wolf I: u .L A I ./ s. 70' of Me N except e. Box 3163 18.75' Aspen Lot he 37' of K & L; n. 30' Eao:les Club of M Box 1 96 Aspen Lot e. 18.75' of N; 0; P; Aspenhof Cond. 0 (part) % John Cheek Box 33 Aspen Lot ee 71* of 2; R; S C.A. Meur Corp. 2 Washington Blvd. Detroit, Michigan 48226 BLOCK 96 Lot A; B; we 71' of C Independence Co. % I. Gertrge Robinson & W. Robinson Box 5243 ToA. Denver, Colorado 80217 Lot e. 221' of C; D; E; F; Christonher Dver wo 25' of G Box 1782 Rancho Santa Fe, Calif. 92067 T 04- 7. 4. r. r (3 ; 11; A. 29 ' & St.ein Erickson 83/11" Af T. 4. 71,1 of T Boy 1045 A r r B n T ot K thru S Arthur H i.Â· de 9 1 1 1 + n 901 7079 Old Georeetown id. Rnthosds, Maryland 20014 Lot K; L Steve Marcus, Rex 1709, Aspen - 92-0 I December 23, 1974 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF ASPEN, COLORADO FROM: EVAN GULL, ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR SUBJECT: PROPOSALS TO DES IGNATE COMME.RCIAL CORE AND WEST RESIDENTIAL AREA STONYÂ£~2,2o-yul-'.yum I would like to express my strong opposition to the proposals providing for Building Permit Review by the Historic Preservation Committee for areas designated historic. The pro- posals as structured establish controls over the future exterior appearances of all buildings within these areas without regard to the historical value of the structure. The desire to preserve the heritage of the Aspen area is one that I share with the Council and the Historical Preservation Committee. The current proposal addresses this problem but, unfortunately, includes provision for architectura.1 control of all other buildings as well. I am opposed to the current proposals for the following reasons: 1. The proposal does not address itself to the issue that concerns us. That i.ssue is historical preservation as described in the title of that committee which was formed to consider it. This ordinance as it i.s written constitutes architectural control. If we are interested in architectural control of future buildings, and of existing non-historic structures, then let us address that topic directly rather than under the guise of "historic preservation." 2. It should be the duty of the Mayor and Council to insure that any restrictive law that they choose to pass confronts and regulates a demonstrated current or future problem. I do not feel that a problem of such magnitude exists which might justify the regulation of the exterior appearances of all buildings in the designated zones. 3. The proposal undul.y restricts the right of an individual to build in a manner which pleases his own taste. These rights are restricted without demonstrating that the controls are neces- sary to protect the public interest. An individual is entitled to a succinct description of those restrictions to be imposed upon his property. The zoning ordinance accomplishes this by addressing the issues of bulk, density, etc., but does not inject arbitrary and capricious controls. An individual desiring to build should not be subjected to the expense of dealing with undefined issues Memo to Mayor and City Council of Aspen, Colorado December 23, 1974 Page 2 of personal taste. Unfortunately, in the past the Historic Preservation Committee has demonstrated that a proposal such as this will result in controls which do not deal with the issues at hand, but with personal likes and dislikes. 4. The administration problems that accompanied the implementation of Ordinance 19 zoning review provide us with a valuable insight to the potential problems of dealing with this proposal. That review was primarily concerned with the issue of density, and yet still caused a significant administrative problem for the city government. When personal taste becomes a review criteria, I envision a significant alienation of the public in dealing with the government, and thus a lessening in the cooperation required for effective administration of the zoning and building laws. - I sincerely hope that the Mayor and Council will give strong consideration to the actual impact of this proposed ordinance as it contrasts with the intended purpose. (1 do A u.wL*Â·Â«QUI A-- theodore 1.mularz AIA Â· architect p.o. box 166 Â· aspen, colorado 81611 Â· telephone 925-3365 23 December 1974 Stacey Standley, Mayor City of Aspen P.O. Box 0 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Stacey: As a person who has done a great deal in the interst of preserving the architectural character of Aspen, during my sixteen years as a resident and an Architect, I submit this letter in~pposition to the ordinance creating a Historic District within the Commercial Core in it's present forrri. Unfortunately the public hearing is scheduled during a week when many residents are busy because of the Holiday Season and I, as one, apologize for not being able to attend personally. I have, however, expressed my criticisms and objections as well as given positive input to the Historic Committee at two different meet- ings prior to this evening obviously to no avail. Other Aspen Architects and I would be happy to review them again with Council at another time convenient for all of US. Sincerely, del- /hAZP Theodore L. Mularz, AIA tim:t MEMORANDUM TO: JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, P & Z, AND HPC FROM: JANET LANDRY REF: HISTORIC DESIGNATION I am fully in favor of historic designation of the Commercial Core District and feel that it is properly within the public jurisdiction to preserve historic sites for their historic significance, but that it is not properly within the public jurisdiction to adopt design criteria for new construction. This is particularly true of a historic district which consists of the only commercial zoning available in the City. My objection would be mollified if the whole City were designated as a historic district with architectural criteria by referendum, or if there were an alternative site for anyone who wanted to build a new commercial building. Janet Landry JL:sbs Â·1 \ 1 0*t 3, /99Â¥ 11%,Â¥m -in doe..4- Mle_e-luil--0 4--111- Com_01=4(ovo~_(147- (700001_L_-3*lck___ HLP(1, - iI-ORe. 013 viet__L-adri - i~ 2- ,vm ,Lu,4-_k_*veÂ» 0~- 63.411 a*s,y,te/to.-_ 4-,fwi_am,:ne,, a / do-474Â£k_ 2,&1cn~4e-z /2*k--,7- is ~/~Fe'~- tu./70,4,___ bie__DeÂ» 3 joyis.62/p-<. 40 zie suve __41,603 - s<kis_- 16-K_-2*0 I>- /7/s /0,/6 -P-- 919 Miticande hot- lita + it- h ho j- nrorq vi v - / d. W#M ,70,= paa pt /'su&40#A_(f--41; des,cp, _er-Nt- via f-or--new_-_-ao &154 vuelia,r --_461-3 - ii_____ *4(Fo_[Â»(7 -47-urr of a. h1:4-04-,9, Cf[St'/04 *_121_Â« Co nsi sk-__O f- 3~le-0 w l'~__(30 ill Â¢01 0 00 ( af -20 1,6,1 7 - Â·Â·auak / 3 lo te _ -J-Li__- *\-e_.9 rly $ /322~_2~4 243 81- t,Â£/ocÂ«7 24- 0,0/â‚¬,UÂ£Â£_ 0_202_- 00 hole d 4-9 loe Â» des,9 ea_trrk__cas a hi 54Â£22 - clit-1-h et- 01416 -arokil-eefula_/ (16*erra_ by_ - tt~tee~ cf ovvt __Or_) 1--- 4-Aep-e_ u.kt- re 1 Ll a )44.01 =4-i u-(2-- / -1-or -- 12 17 o n e - Co h o u j e Nerf fo h olicf a ce- Ca _ Corn me.vap, i buvid i_~ct * O 4 r, I. . C ITY4NDR~[$ PEN aspen,colorado, 8160 box v MEMORANDUM To: Aspen City Council FROM: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Written Report Regarding the Proposed H, Historic Overlay District DATE: August 20, 1974 The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission held a joint public hearing with the Historic Preservation Committee for the proposed designation of the H, Historic Overlay District on June 25, 1974. On July 16, 1974 the Planning and Zoning Commission passed a motion stating that a recommendation for or against designation of the H, Historic Overlay District cannot be made based on the following concerns: 1. That public comments received at the hearing were in opposition to the proposed district; 2. That the ordinance itself should contain the criteria by which new construction in the district is reviewed; 3. That the criteria for review of new construction is vague and difficult to interpret, and 4. That the ordinance should provide appeal procedures before resorting to litigation. Because of these concerns the Planning and Zoning Commission feels that an affirmative recommendation should not be made. An alternative negative decision, is also unsatisfactory from the .. MEMORANDUM City Council - H, Historic Overlay District Page Two standpoint that the Commission supports historic preservation and a negative decision would be in effect for the period of one year due to the provisions of Ordinance 9. Therefore, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby submits their concerns over designation of the H, Historic Overlay District without a negative or affirmative recommenda- tio~7 A A AI 1_- Chairlhan ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Dated this ~/ day of dd~Lf, 1974. ENCLOSURES: Letters and consent forms from property owners in the proposed district. Historic Preservation Committee Preliminary Review Criteria. 7-- /0 -74 00 1. New construction/remodeling shall not extend for more than three town lots (90' x 100') without an alteration of at least 8 feet in the front set- back line of the building facade. 11 juti/0 L Ll Â·Ft 7816- f -4 tile. A-06-0Â£.+-Â· 0 Building roofs of new construction/remodeling shall not exceed three town lots without an alteration in form and/or height as it relates to the front setback. These roofs shall be flat, gabled or hip. Established local historic variation shall be reviewed. 2. Exposed side and rear elevations shall be of identical materials a s the front facade or of a color or material analogous to the front facade. Any street ormall facade shall be considered. A FRD N T F Ac y\DiE Building materials other than brick, cut stone or clapboard siding shall be of a nature and texture not to detract from the significance and character of the historic buildings within the district. 3. Fenestrations above the first floor shall be greater in vertical dinlinsions than horizonal. Building details, if used, shall be oriented to fenestrations, corners, roof lines and at floor levels. /1 J ' 4 10'F)1'22<-c-4 4. No new construction~shall have ekposed structural skeletal elements other than load bearing walls. 5. Porc}les,<stoops shall not exceed 20 feet along the-4. Â· Â·-- I .ef any facade. Balconies shall not project beyond the building se,1,-k. H-6 Kic 6. Painted front facades shall not exceed ,#:4 feet without a color or textured alteration. 0/C 7. Colors, values, intensity and color placement *rt tonsidered a vali d controversial artistic embelishmeny, having an intimate relationship to all the foregoing criteria *ad shall be subject to review by the HPC - act==C*zepbliwhea:rmg,- P, r 4 it~ A. 4 â‚¬ 3~Â«~hh ed (p r 64< C ' 4 L./>=* Â£<c 8, U 4, r (54\Ar-4 1.-d be-Alf .- 0 . 1 ' t = $ t . ASPEN MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION STUDY - Winter '75 OWNERSHIP Block 37, lots .R,S lot date/instrument Grantor Grantee QRS 2-21-81 WD B.Clark Wheeler Chas. D. Gurley RS 4-15-82 QCD Jessie Sinclair Chas.W.Durand and George H. Lawrence I 1 " George H.Lawrence Chas.W.Durand 5-24-82 QCD " 12-8-83 QCD Chas. W.DuranA G.H.Lawrence i 4 QRS 12-12-84 deed B.E.Shear George H.Lawrence Town of Aspen 4 " 10-26-87 deed M.G.Miller,C.J. George H.Lawrence f Town of Aspen i " 10-27-87 QCD George.H.Lawrence Rachel R.Ferris p- 1 k 11-13-08 WD Rachel R. Ferris S.J.Silvinis 1-27-37 order of Summit Cty.Court Estate of S.J.Silvinis i probate 1-27-37 decree Summit Cty.Court Jennie G.Silvino 12-14-38 adm.decree adm. Jewell Gould Brynhild K.Graves . Â·t: I " 10-3-45 WD Brynhild K.Graves Walter P.Paei,cke v# 4 0 1 " Walter P.Paepcke Aspen Comp. 3-24-47 deed 1% PQRS 1-5-59 WD The Aspen Co. McAlpine-Annan Corp. 1~ 1 t .4 2 " 2-25-60 QCD Aka,Walter G. & McAlpine-Annan Corp. 23 Walter P.Paepcke 2-25-60 QCD City of Aspen McAlpine Corp. i A 1,C E f . 6 %Â·4. Â·-grs,Â·Â·t,Bl ~aL *â€¢ = -â€¢ ?4â€¢eW/t*Â·*I.R.%-I we*NUV- I-Â· 02,#**t@i. beÂ·~22&**..***31*FAKâ‚¬,@*4,â€¢Â·~9Â· Â· 4 . . 5 5-21-64 WD McAlpine-Annan Corp. Donald E.Copelin Woo~s~~ ~:Wo~kds ~ne 2-20-74 QCD Woods,Woodson K. Flora Dora Corp. 3-20-74 QCD Thomas R.Baskett Flora Dora Corp. 8-Â·15-74 WD Flora Dora Corp. Richard R.Woods 5-4-70 WD Donald E. Copelin RESOLUTION OF DESIGNATION BY THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee has conducted a preliminary investigation of that area of the City of Aspen shown as the "Proposed Historic District" on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, such investigation demonstrates that such area constituting the commercial core of the City of Aspen: 1. Has character, interest and value as part of the development, heritage, and cultural characteristics of the City; 2. Exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social and historical heritage of the community; 3. Includes many structures which portray the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive archi- tectural style; and 4. Which structures, in addition, contain elements of design, detail, material and craftsmanship representing a significant architectural style; and that by the district preservation will be promoted the health, safety and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the community, and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Committee has contacted, by mail, all owners of record of properties within said proposed district outlining the reasons for and effects of designation as an H, Historic Over- lay District, and requested their consent to such designation, and WHEREAS, the preliminary investigation having been completed and the requisite contact with owners having been accomplished, the Committee wishes to formally initiate designation procedures by adoption of a resolution all as provided for in Section 24-9.1(e) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Colorado, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE OF ASPEN, COLORADO: 1. That preliminary investigation and review indicates that the area of the City of Aspen shown as "Proposed Historic District" in Exhibit A hereto is eligible and has been selected for designation as an H, Historic Overlay District; 2. That the Committee is in receipt of consent from several owners, but wishes to proceed without the consent of all owners because of the short period having elapsed since notice was given and the importance of this desig- nation to the community; 3. That the findings of this Committee be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission at its meeting to be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1974, a regular meeting of the Commission, for its preliminary approval; 4. And that, at such meeting, or continuation thereof, there be scheduled a joint public hearing of the Historic Preservation Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission for Tuesday, June 25, 197 4, at 5 P.M., all as required by Section 24-11(c) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Colorado. Date: June 4 493-4 9- n - I, ~4,4,2 6 -04â„¢ , duly authorized and acting deputy city clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is an accurate copy of that -- 4 resolution adopted by thie Historic Preservation Committee at its special meeting held June 4, 1974. -,44Â¢r 4 6- /21-7/ Debuty City Clerk EXHIBIT A I. 1 . WISTCROC PRESEmVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT 1 1 - ! || 1 - PITKIN COUNTY 1 1 2 COURT HOUSE ~ ll~~ MAIN ST. 1 1 3 4 5 6 1 7 1 1 1 11 I CITYI- - 14 ~ HALL' | ~ It HOPKINS AVE. -1 lii {011 12 14 11 H EK U] 1 lilli I E~ 15 ~| ~ 111,1 O ILL 204 1 111 1 H HYMAN AVE. r 1 0 1 1 . 11 Â£ ' 1 1 01 - ?8 13 20~ ~ 1 . i 4 1 2 COOPEGI AVE. Ul 1!1 1 1 1 111 DURANT AVE. LEGEND * Designation pending action bv City Council ~~ EXISTING DESIGNATED STRUCTURE 11. Photographic Studio 12. Aspen Lumber and Supply and Sabbatini's 13. Brand Building PROPOSED STRUCTURES FOR DESIGNATION 14. Two Residential Structures 1. Aspen Times 15. Mother Lode 2. Hotel Jerome 16. Danny's, Aspen Drug and Jake's Abbey 3. Three Residential Structures 17. Elks' Building 4. Elli's of Aspen 18. Liquor Store 5. Epicure 19. Paragon and the Aspen Block 6. Saint Mary's Parish Home 20. Cowenhoven Building 7. Saint Mary's Church 21. Red Onion 8. Two Residences and La Cocina Restaurant 22. Eagles Building 9. Isis Theatre 23. Independence Building 10. Three Residential Structures ' 24. Bowman Block DISTRICT BOUNDARY MILL ST. DISTRICT BOUNDARY . MEMORANDUM TO: MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: SANDRA M. STULLER DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1974 RE: CREATION OF THE H, HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT Members of the Council At the October 15th agenda lunch meeting, it was requested that I prepare, in anticipation of the announced public hear- ing, a memorandum of the legal justification supporting the creation of the proposed historic overlay district for the commercial core. The following is respectfully submitted. Colorado Statutory Law House Bill 1034 enacted in 1974 provides that any local government may plan for and regulate the use of land by "pre- serving areas of historical and archaeological importance. " That means the landmark and historic district preservation ordinances such as have been adopted by some Colorado local governments are now specifically authorized by state statute. This legislation does not enhance our authority as a home rule city to enact such legislation, but it certainly does , give the concept more "legitimacy" and should make our ordinance more acceptable to any court that might review it. The newest piece of Colorado legislation to affect historic designation is House Bill 1041, also enacted in 1974. The bill is going to have enormous impact in Colorado, and it encourages, essentially, that each local government (1) identify and designate areas and activities of state interest and then (2) issue guidelines for the regulation and then actual regulation of such areas and activities. Memorandum to Members of City Council October 16, 1974 Page Two One of the concerns of state interest identified in House Bill 1041 which should be considered by local govern- ments include "areas containing, or having significant impac t upon, historical, natural, or archaeological resources of statewide importance. " Historical and archaeological resources of statewide importance are defined as those "resources which have been officially designated by statute, or included in an established list of places complied by the State Historical Society." The established list referred to is the State Inventory of Historic Sites being compiled by the Historical Society in cooperation with local individuals and organiza- tions. When a local government designates an area containing historic or archaeological resources as an area of state interest, the standard for management of those areas is that they be administered "in a manner that will allow man to function in harmony with, rather than be destructive to, these resources ... Developments in areas containing historic, archaeological, or natural resources shall be conducted in a manner which will minimize damage to those resources for future use." The legislation requires us, with Pitkin County, to begin designation of the areas and activities of state interest before the end of this year. Caselaw Supporting Historic Districts United State Courts have often sustained the creation of historic districts in areas where the preservation of the sites is closely related to a vital tourist industry. Let me repeat some of the Courts' comments in these cases. Opinion of the Justices of the Senate, Mass. 1955, 128 N.E. 2d 557. The question involved was a statutory amendment "to promote the general welfare of the inhabitants of the town of Nantucket through the preservation and protection of historic buildings, places and districts of historic interest; through the.development of an appropriate set- ting for these buildings, places and districts; and through the benefits resulting to the economy of Nantucket in devel- oping and maintaining its vacation-travel industry through the promotion of these historic associations." At page 562, the Court says: "In the case of City of New Bedford v New Bedford, Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steam- ship Authority, this court took judicial notice of the Memorandum to Members of the City Council October 16, 1974 Page Three general characteristics of the island of Nantucket and of its great interest in the entertainment of summer visitors. We may also take judicial notice that Nantucket is one of the very old towns of the Commonwealth; that for perhaps a century it was a famous seat of the whaling industry and accumulated wealth and culture which made itself manifest in some fine examples of early American architecture; and that the sedate and quaint appearance of the old island town has to a large extent still remained unspoiled and in all probability constitutes a substantial part of the appeal which has enabled it to build up its summer vacation business to take the place of its former means of livelihood. In a general way, much the same can be said of the village of Siasconset, which is a part of the town of Nantucket. There has been substantial recognition by the courts of the public interest in the preservation of historic buildings, places and districts." The Court continued: "It is not difficult to imagine how the erection of ' a few wholly incongruous structures might destroy one of the principal assets of the town, and we assume that the boundaries of the districts are so drawn as to include only areas of special value to the public because of possession of those characteristics which it is the purpose of the act to preserve." Opinion of the Justices of the Senate, Mass. 1955, 128 N.E. 2d 563, in which virtually the same answers were given to the validity of the statute in its application to the Beacon Hill District of Boston. In this case, at page 566, the court said: "The announced purpose of the act is to preserve this historic section for the educational, cultural, and economic advantage of the public. If the General Court believes that this object would be attained by the restrictions which the act would place upon the introduction into the district of inappropriate forms of construction that would destroy its unique value and associations, a court can hardly take the view that such legislative determination is so arbitrary or unreasonable that it cannot be comprehended within the public welfare." Memorandum to Members of the City Council October 16, 1974 Page Four City of Santa Fe v Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., 389 P2d 13. The purpose of the act involved was to preserve the character- istics of a certain area in the City of Santa Fe. Height limitations were involved as well as structural and archi- tectural features being regulated. In the act it was stated that the purpose was "to promote the economic, cultural and general welfare of the people of the City of Santa Fe." Upholding the validity of these various limitations, the court states, at Page 18: "New Mexico is particularly dependent upon its scenic beauty to attract the host of visitors, the income from whose visits is a vital factor in our economy. Santa Fe is known throughout the whole country for its historic features and culture. Many of our laws have their origin in that early culture. It must be obvious that the general welfare of the community and of the State is enhanced thereby. Bearing in mind all these factors, we hold that regulation of the size of window panes in the construction or alteration of buildings within the historic area of Santa Fe, as a part of the 'Old Sante Fe Style' of architecture, is a valid exercise of the police power granted to the city." City of New Orleans v Impastato, Louisiana 1941, 3 So. 2d 559, City of New Orleans v Pergament, Louisiana 1941, 5 So. 2d 129, City of New Oreleans v Levy, Louisiana 1953, 64 So. 2d 798. The foregoing cases all concern the validity of an ordinance of the City of New Orleans rigidly limiting and controlling the type of construction which might occur in the Vieux Carre section of the municipality. The validity of the ordinance was sustained and I make only the following quote from the latter of the three cases in which, at Page 802, the court states: "Finally, defendant takes the position that Article XIV, Section 22A of the Louisiana Constitution and the ordinances enacted pursuant thereto are unconstitutional since they are enacted solely for esthetic purposes and are not within the police power. Perhpas esthetic considerations alone would not warrant an imposition of the several restrictions con- tained in the Vieux Carre Commission Ordinance. But, as pointed out in the Pergament case, this legislation is in the interest of an beneficial to the inhabitants of New Orleans generally, the preserving of the Vieux Carre section being not only for its sentimental value but also for Memorandum to A ,ers of the City Council October 16, 1974 Page Five its commercial value, and hence it constitutes a valid exercise of the police power. Incidentally, both the constitutional amendment and the ordinance recite that the preservation is for the public welfare." Other cases supporting the "architectural review" inherent in historic district designation are as follows: Town of Deering ex rel. Bittenbenden v Tibbets, 104 N.H. 481, 202 A2d 232 (1964); Reid v Architectural Board of Review, 119 Ohio App. 67, 192 N.E. 2d 74 (1963); Opinion of Justices, 103 N.H. 268, 169 A2d 762 (1961); Sunad, Inc. v City of Sarasota, 122 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1960); State ex rel. Saveland. Park Holding Corp. v Wieland, 269 Wis 262, 69 N.W. 2d 217. Cases of Special Interest Two cases promulgated this year are of special interest. The first is Mayor and Alderman of Annapolis v Anne Arundel County, 316 A2d 803 (Maryland January 30, 1974) which con- cerned the attempted destruction by the county of an historic church owned by it but located in the city's historic district. The county asserted that the city historic preservation committee did not have jurisdiction over it as it was a political subdivision of the state and exempt from the com- mittee's authority. The Court concluded to the contrary: "The city of Annapolis is one of the municipal corporations having home rule power pursuant to the Maryland Constitution. As a home rule municipality, there are no limitations or provisions in the Constitution or statutory provisions which purport to exempt the county from the laws of the city of Annapolis ...a county can be subject to the reasonable police regulations of a municipality .... The chancellor (lower court judge) was of the opinion that historic zoning was analogous to traditional zoning and that the majority rule of our sister states that a county could not be subject to a municipal zoning ordinance in regard to a county governmental function applied. We disagree with the chancellor's conclusion in this regard." A second case that I alluded to in one of our earlier meet- ings with the HPC is that of Maker v City of New Orleans, 371 F. Supp. 653 (Louisiana, February 21, 1974). As Council is aware, the Vieux Carre (French Quarter) has been desig- nated an historic district. Within -the district there existed a small Victorian cottage which the owner wished to demolish Memorandum to M )ers of the City Council October 16, 197 Page Six and, in its stead, construct an addition to his residence in a French-Spanish architecture. The historic committee denied issuance of a demolition permit. The owner argued that the cottage in question possessed no historical or architectural value, while the Vieux Carre ordinance has the avowed purpose of preserving buildings of "historic or architectural value in order to enhance the economic resources of the city." The Court refused to accept this argument, finding the "purpose of the ordinance is not only to preserve the old buildings themselves, but to preserve the antiquity of the whole French and Spanish quarter, the tout ensemble, so to speak . . ." More specifically, the Court continued: "Perhaps even more important, it must be remembered that the Vieux Carre is more than a museum of French and Spanish architectural styles but is a mixture of construction unique to New Orleans, as well as a living residential and commercial neighborhood containing a lively potpourri of socio-economic and personal life styles. In many cases it would be a disservice to 'the charm and distinctive character' of the Vieux Carre to permit the demolition of existing buildings in order to create new replicas of the past." Other Colorado Preservation Ordinances The following local governments in Colorado have adopted or are in the process of adopting-historic preservation or landmark preservation ordinances: Aspen Crested Butte Silverton Boulder Denver Telluride Breckenridge Fort Collins Trinidad Georgetown Boulder County These ordinances vary in their approach and their strict- ness. In general they include the following provisions: A declaration of intent; establishment of a commission to review and designate historic sites; administrative procedures the commission must follow; a list of powers and duties of the commission; authorization for a local survey under the authority of the commission; procedures for designating historic land- marks or districts; procedures to delay demolition or altera- tion of designated properties, for the purpose of finding - alternates to demolition or alterations; procedures to control restoration, reconstruction and use of designated properties; and anti-neglect regulations. Memorandum to L--iers of the City Council October 16, 1974 Page Seven The towns of Crested Butte and Telluride have declared the whole town an historic district, while Georgetown has applied that designation to approximately one half the city's acreage. Effects of Historic Designation In establishing an historic district, as opposed to designating specific structures, all land (vacant or other- wise) and existing and proposed structures within the district area come under the close supervision of the Preservation Committee. Let me describe the effect as ' follows: Required Review No building permit may issue for 1. the exterior remodeling or reconstruction of any structure within the district; 2. the demolition or moving of any structure within the district; or 3. the construction or erection of any new structure or addition to any structure within the district; unless the building inspector determines that no change to the exterior appearance of the structure or combination of structures will occur, or until the Preservation Committee has reviewed the permit application and approved the same. Review Procedures The review procedures are rather complex so I will merely summarize. They require an applicant to submit preliminary scale drawings and outline specifications to the building inspector who will determine if exterior changes will result. If so, the material is forwarded to the Preservation Committee who will hold at least one public hearing and then either: 1. approve or approve the proposal subject to modifications and so advise the building inspector, or 2. disapprove and so notify the building inspector who must then deny the permit. Criteria for Approval The Preservation Committee will judge any proposed remodeling for the preservation of historical, architectural and characteristic qualities, and any new structure for complementary design with the existing structures within the district (the criteria proposed to be used have been submitted to Council). In case of an application to raze, demolish or.move a structure, judgment shall be made on Memorandum to 1 ,ers of the City Council October 16, 1974 Page Eight the basis of the structure's historical and architectural importance, its importance as a part of the area within which it is located, and the actual physical condtion of the structure. Dangerous Conditions; Exceptions; Appeal The Committee may grant exceptions from the effects of designation, and Committee approval is not necessary when the owner is repairing or demolishing a structure on order of a city or other governmental officer when needed to remedy a dangerous condition. Right of Appeal There exists in the Code at present no right of appeal from an adverse decision of the Preservation Committee. However, at the request of the Planning and Zoning Commission the following appeal procedure has been included in the proposed zoning code: "24-9.12 Appeal Procedure Any action of the Committee in disapproving or conditionally approving a permit application, may be taken to the City Council within sixty (60) days of the decision and any action of the Committee so appealed from shall not become effective unless and until approved by the Council. On appeal the City Council may: A. Grant exceptions or waivers from the provisions of this article when required to prevent a substantial hardship to the effected land owner or injury to the public; B. Explore all means for preserving the historic structure or site including, but not limited to, the feasibility of a modification of the plans or alternate private use of the structure or site which would substanitally preserve the original character thereof, or the possibility of tax relief or public acquisition of the structure or site involved. CC: Lorraine Graves John Stanford Mick Mahoney SMS:ksh HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE REPORT TO COUNCIL Regarding Designation of the H, Historic Overlay District The Historic Preservation Committee recommends the adoption of the pro- posed H, Historic Overlay District. We have conducted a joint public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 25, 1974 to hear public comments on the proposed H, Historic Overlay District. As prescribed by ordinance pro- cedures, the Historic Preservation Committee received preliminary approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission and adopted a resolution stating the viability of the proposed district and establishing that the Historic Preservation Com- mittee should proceed with the designation without unanimous consent from property owners in the district. The Planning and Zoning Commission expressed various concerns over designating the district after the public hearing. At a later meeting they moved to avoid a positive or negative decision in order to prevent Ordinance 9 from coming into effect. We feel that the Planning and Zoning Commission's misgivings should not prevent the establishment of the Historic Overlay District. Development pressures have been significant in the area, and the integrity of Aspen's Victorian character has been threatened already by new construction which, clearly will not complement our existing historic buildings and the surrounding environment. In addition, Ordinance 19 will no longer be in effect with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation for adoption of the revised zoning code and map. The proposed historic district will then be open to any type of development provided building code requirements are met. Along with our recommendation, we enclose a map of the proposed historic district and a list of the criteria which will be utilized in the review and analysis of remodeled and new construction within the district. Included also is the draft of several questions and answers which will accompany the criteria in a pamphlet for general distribution. The pamphlet will be available to persons applying for building permits for exterior construction in the historic district. The purpose of the pamphlet is to inform the public, architects and developers of the purpose, and operation of the historic district. 10/74 .. ASPEN'S HISTORIC DISTRICT This brochure has been prepared to give assistance to architects, planners and developers who have projects located in Aspen's historic district. The intent here is to state the purpose of the district; the City's goals and objectives regarding the Historic District to provide guidelines that identify physical elements of the district which should be incorporated into future development. The following questions explain the historic district and the development and use of the criteria. WHY ESTABLISH A HISTORIC DISTRICT? Aspen has a concentration of Victorian buildings in the downtown area. These old structures contribute to Aspen's heritage as a west- ern mining town, and provide a unique individual setting as a winter and summer resort. Many of the old buildings are outstanding examples of historical or architectural significance while others are less prestigious. Together they represent an area with distinctive char- acteristics that cannot be attributed to individual structures but rather to the combination of the whole. In essence, the total is greater than the sum of its parts. Therefore, the purpose of the Historic District is to protect and promote the visual environment in which the historic structures exist. -2- . WHY NOT JUST DESIGNATE EACH INDIVIDUAL HISTORIC STRUCTURE? Aspen's concentration of historic structures are interspersed with more recent buildings and vacant land. Some of the newer buildings complement the visual impression established by the historic structures while other newer buildings make individual impressions which are unrelated to the predominate historic character. Designation of only the historic structures would not protect the character of the surrounding environment. There- fore, establishment of the historic district is an effort to create a continuity of old and new structures which have a visual harmony. -3- . I. DOES THIS MEAN THAT NEW BUILDINGS MUST "LOOK OLD"? Absolutely not!! The proposed historic district does not dictate architecture and new construction to perpetuate imitations of earlier architectural styles. New construction is, in fact, encouraged to be a positive statement of today's contemporary architecture utilizing new ideas and technology. The only concern established by the historic district is the "compatibility" and "harmony" of new construction with the historic buildings. -4- WHAT ARE THE FACTORS THAT ESTABLISH "COMPATIBILITY" AND HARMONY"? Compatibility and harmony can be defined as those physical and visual elements of the historic structures which are similar. For instance similarities of scale, massing, form building materials, colors, textures, fenestrations etc. of buildings in the proposed historic district have been analysed and identified. These simi- larities form the basis of the criteria as a guide for new construe- tion, additions and exterior remodeling of buildings in Aspen's proposed historic district. Several examples of similarity of Aspen's historic structures are as follows: SCALE - Each of the historic structures exist on one, two or three town lots (except for City Hall which extends onto a fraction of a fourth lot). The build- ings are also three and one-half floors or less. FORM - The historic buildings are all basically rec- tilinear with variations in lengths of facades, heights, roof shapes and special architectural features (ie. the Elks Building dome, the Court House Cupola). BUILDING MATERIALS - Larger buildings in Aspen are com- posed of rectilinear masony or stone while wood is often used on smaller structures. COLOR - Larger buildings are again generally variety of a warm muted earth colors similar to indigeneous materials with a variety of trim colors that complement the massonry. -5- In Aspen, we are blessed with historic houses, commercial buildings, churches, hotels and public buildings that add character, continuity and interest to the community. We believe these structures attest their own significance, and we are dedicated to their preservation and the development of an attractive urban environment. Indeed it is the belief of the Historical Preservation Committee that preservation and enhancement of these symbols of Aspen's past is progress - progress that contributes to the character, educational and recreational values of Aspen's future. This cultural heritage, once destroyed, can never be replaced. -6- r)==a n rpiaa t==0 ri==71 1-1 rÂ»a LUzd U 23 U Li=Lill LUg T 1 ' 11 1 li litil li i .ji .1 111 11 1 1 1 - PITKIN M 1 11 HOUSE 1 2 - counr i COUNTY 1 An Aird ST. 45 6 .. 1 V 1 i i r--7--T ~ HALL nl 29 1 8 6 ciTY.*0 1 HOP KINS AVE. Ill 11 1.1 U] 11 12 '.3 1 114 11 1 li 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .J ]Ij 1 EU,14 upl 1 1Â·QI if, 1 1%51 1 'li 0 13 4 1 .29 11 IC --- . 1--12:-J 1-RYMAN AVE. 5 -I-- 1 C. Iii . 1 1 1 1 1 0 18 19 20 111 . lili 1 --rT- 6,1 -4-r-_~rÂ·,--_-T... 1 5 L *E'+" '* m z COOPER 111 AVE. P JI I 1 -. 1 1 1' 1 8 l . /1 I 1 I -*41 L /2 0 --DURANT AVE. LEGEND * Designation pending action by City Counal C71 EXISTING DESIGNA1 ED STRUCTURE 11. Photographic Studio 12. Aspen Lumber and Supply and Sabbatini's PROPOSED STRUCTURES FOR DESIGNAT ION 13. Brand BIll Iclitig 14, Two Residential Structures 1. Aspen Times 15. Mother Lode 2. Hotel Jerome 16. Danny's, Aspen Drug and Jake's Abbey 3. Three Residential Structures 17. Elks' Building 4. Elli's of Aspon 18, Liquor Store 5. [picure 19. Paragon and tile Aspen Block 6. Saint Moty's Parish Heme 20. Cowenhoven Building 7. Saint Mary's Church 21. Red Onion 8. Two Residences and La Cocin,: Restaurant 22. Eagles Building 9. Isis Theaue 23. Independence Building 0. Three liesidential Structures , 24. Bowman 13lock DISTRICT EOUNDAAÂ¥ MaiNnH r . ASPEN'S HISTORIC DISTRICT This brochure has been prepared to give assistance to architects, planners and developers who have projects located in Aspen's historic district. The intent here is to state the purpose of the district; the City's goals and objectives regarding the Historic District tq provide guidelines that identify physical elements of the district' . which should be incorporated into future development. The following questions explain the historic district and the development and use of the criteria. WHY ESTABLISH A HISTORIC DISTRICT? Aspen has a concentration of Victorian buildings in the downtown area. These old structures contribute to Aspen's heritage as a west- ern mining town, and provide a unique individual setting as a wintur and summer resort. Many of the old buildings are outstanding examples of historical or architectural significance while others are less prestigious. Together they represent an area with distinctive char- acteristics that cannot be attributed to individual structures but rather to the combination of the whole. In essence, the total is greater than the sum of its parts. Therefore, the purpose of the Historic District is to protect and promote the visual environment in which the historic structures exist. -2- LÂ· . - I WHY NOT JUST DESIGNATE EACH INDIVIDUAL HISTORIC STRUCTURE? Aspen's concentration of historic structures are interspersed Â·. with more recent buildings and vacant land. Some of the newer buildings complement the visual impression established by the historic structures while other newer buildings make individual impressions which are unrelated to the predominate historic - character. Designation of only the historic structures would not protect the character of the surrounding environment. There- fore, establishment of the historic district is an effort to create a continuity of old and new structures which have a visual harmony. '6:, DOES THIS MEA v THAT tic'Â·, BUILDINGS MUST "LOOK OLD"? I 1 L H Absolutely not!! The proposed historic district does not dictate architecture and new construction to perpetuate imitations of earlier architectural styles. New construction is, in fact, encouraged to be a positive statement of today's contemporary architecture utilizing new ideas and technology. The only concern established by the historic district is the 'tcompatibility" and "harmony" of new construction with the historic buildings. -4- . WHAT ARE THE FACTORS THAT ESTABLISH "COMPATIBILITY" AND HARMONY"? Compatibility and harmony can be defined as those physical and visual elements of the historic structures which are similar. For. instance similarities of scale, massing, form building materials, colors, textures, fenestrations etc. of buildings in the proposed historic district have been analysed and identified. These simi- larities form the basis of the criteria as a guide for new construe- tion, additions and exterior remodeling of buildings in Aspen's proposed historic district. Several examples of similarity of Aspen's historic structures are as follows: SCALE - Each of the historic structures exist on one, two or three town lots (except for City Hall which extends onto a fraction of a fourth lot). The build- ings are also three and one-half floors or less. FORM - The historic buildings are all basically rec- tilinear with variations in lengths of.facades, heights, roof shapes and special architectural features (ie. the Elks Building dome, the Court House Cupola). BUILDING MATERIALS - Larger buildings in Aspen are com- posed of rectilinear masony or stone while wood is often used on smaller structures. Â£01.011 - Larger buildings are again generally variety of a warm muted earth colors similar to indigeneous . materials with a variety of trim colors that complement the massonry. -5- I . In Aspen, we are blessed with historic houses, commercial buildings, churches, hotels and public buildings that add character, continuity and interest to the community. We believe these structures attest their own significance, and we are dedicated to their preservation and the development of an attractive urban environment. Indeed it is the belief of the Historical Preservation Committee that preservation and enhancement of these symbols of Aspen's past is progress - progress that contributes to the character, educational and recreational values of Aspen's future. This cultural heritage, once destroyed, can never be replaced. -6- L . HIC.FORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Cl .RIA FOR DOWNTOWN CORE AREA MASSING 1. New construction or remodeling shall not extend for more than three town lots (90' x 100') without an alteration of at least 8 feet in the front setback line of the building facade which is parallel to tlie alley. Building roofs of the new construction or remodeling shall not exceed three town lots without an alteration in the form and/or height as it relates to the front setback. These roofs shall be flat, gabled or hip. Established local historic variation shall be reviewed. MATERIALS 2. Exposed side and rear elevations shall be of identical materials as the front facade or of a color or material analogous to the front facade. Any street or mall facade shall be considered a front facade. Building materials other than brick, cut stone or clapboard siding shall be of a nature and texture not to detrac-t from the . significance and.character of the historic buildings within the district. Reflective-coated or mirrored-glass will not be allowed, Hip or gabled roofs shall be standing rib sheet metal, wood or comosition shingles, or suitable facsimile thereof. Other materials shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Committee. DETAILS 3. Overall visual impression of fenestration above the first floor shall be greater in vertical dimensions than horizontal. (as amended) Building details, if used, shall be oriented to fenestrations, corners, roof lines and at floor levels. TEXTURE OF THE DISTRICT 4. No new construction or remodeling shall have exposed structural skeletal elements other than load bearing walls. SCALE OF THE DISTRICT 5. Porches and stoops shall not exceed 20 feet along any facade. Balconies shall not project beyond the building facade. COLOR 6. Painted front facades shall not exceed 90 feet without a color or textured alteration. 7. Colors, values, intensity and color placement, being considered a valid controversial artistic embellishment and having an intimate relationship to all the foregoing criteria, shall be subject to review by the Historic Preservation Committee. SUPPORTING FILE DOCUMENTS FOR THE COMMERCIAL CORE HISTORIC DISTRICT I. Goals and Objectives 1. Tentative Objectives -- Goals Task Force, July 6, 1971 2. Tentative Objectives Resolutions -- P & Z, August 3, 1971 3. Goal - Historic Heritage -- Goals Task Force, September 2, 1971 4. Goals Resume -- Planning Office, October 19, 1971 II. Ordinances in Support of Historic Preservation 1. Ordinance 5, 1972 -- Establishment of the Historic Section to the Zoning Code 2. Ordinance 19, July 23, 1973. III. Actions to Designate Individual Structures 1. P&Z resolution to evaluate Lift #1, Stallard House, and Wheeler Opera House, April, 1972 2. H.P.C. and P&Z resolution recommendation to desig- nate the Wheeler Opera House as a historic landmark 3. Council designates Wheeler as a historic land- mark, March 12, 1973 - Ordinance 4. Wheeler Opera House placed on National Register, August 27, 1972. 5. H.P.C. recommendation to designate Court House as historic landmark, June 14, 1973 6. H.P.C. and P&Z recommendation to Council for designation of Court House, July 17, 1973 7. Ordinance 25, 1973, Council designates Court House as historic landmark, September 10, 1973 8. City Hall, Lift #1, and Community Church are recom- mended for historic designation by P & Z, May 21, 1974 IV. Actions to Designate the Historic Overlay District 1. P&Z recommendation to H.P.C. to evaluate the commercial core for a historic district, August 10, 1973 2. H.P.C. recommendation to establish the commercial core as a historic overlay district, October 13, 1973 3. Inventory of all historic structures in the com- mercial core, Spring, 1974. -2- V. Other Documentation 1. John Frisbee, Regional Director of the National Trust for Historic Preservation - lecture on the benefits of a historic district, June 24, 1974 2. James Hartman, Colorado Historical Society, lecture on the benefits of a historic district and historic preservation in the State. 3. Inventory map of historic buildings in the com- mercial core -- rated according to significance. 4. Map of commercial core indicating three area categories for degrees of historic character 5. Map of the commercial core analyzing the sizes of buildings based on lot coverage and number of stories 6. Map of the commercial core analyzing building facade materials utilizing three categories -- wood, masonry and paint 7. Map of Design Objectives for historic preservation of the core 8. Photographic (slide) inventory of historic struc- tures in the commercial core 9. Map of the urban design elements of which the historic overlay district is an important element 10. List of all property owners in the proposed his- torie overlay district 11. Letters and consent forms returned by property owners in the district 12. Reference material from several Colorado cities, Savannah, Georgia, and Alexandria, Virginia for development of criteria for use in reviewing new construction. 13. Reference Literature: Conservation of Historic and Cultural Resources; by Ralph W. Miner. Published by American Society of Planning Officials. Planning for Preservation; by Robert L, Montague, III and Tony Wrenn: Published by the American Society of Planning Officials, Historic Preservation Tomorrow; Second Workshop, published by National Trust for Historic Preserva- tion and colonial Williamsburg, --1-21-k.2 -1 -12 J.Li d - 4 2 i U. u a k.7 CR-7-IER=A=_KO--R---L)-OVV\-OWN CORE A RE-A- el 3 , ,Â· ..J.1 1- L . 1 ,?r'.'' con:'t,ruchon or reriodoli nfl shall not extend for niore than three town lots (90' x ... , 1 f-(11 1 ...../.. with oul an 0-Iteration of at least 8 fect, in the front setback line of the building facade Which b parallel to the all ey. Building roof's of the new construction or remodeli ng shall not exceed three town lots without an alteration in the form and/or height as it, relates to the front setback. These roofs shall be flat, gabled or hip. Established local historic variation shall be reviewed. ALLEN ! 1800'1 ADO,Tior4/:,lu 0,2,4/ /2400 4,400â€¢TiONAL Opta 437Â»c FL 'CLS QuirLEâ‚¬C $3>q / SPAC.r. Q.E.Quift-Â¥10 8Y ' 1 , .ZON"+H M,"( sâ€¢= or,r> SZON),14 - MA; <64 9)91244 1 , -$2., eu-,rE D --r:AlZueuT LOT 4 ;2Â»Â·'TFEO -rÂ»2.JOUT 1-OT 1 + (/1/3/f f/l/////1/(/ .: j!1Ill)lfl!llt!li y 1 -'ff., AC'' Go' Mt,4 OparA '59.hcl IZEâ‚¬U,1%0 Sh'ZON)'44 12.17.Q 4,17. rET) Â¥54 ...5.:,H irÂ·401 ~ 6,00 * e Frk-0.4 r 4 6 0 4, e raa N T Loc.lhor. UD 4/21 1 0,4 - - B 1 /1/ /i/#//////iy // / /6 4 01 ...1 U.P.C. Ce.,TEÂ·Â«AA Jil ,/ 4,9.C. 12.e-QUITZ.f=-W"G.r~T -'006,6 HOT ApPLY 8'- O ,ALTIER-AT, 0,4 90, . ST 2 E E-1- Og, DA/1 L.,1- 8 1- 07 CONDITION 9000 4 4 LoT CoN O,Trot--1 , 2000 4 STREET 01 MALL 7744 70 1%112115 ALL VE Y 4 \ / / /-// /4//// i / / i / / / i / // / / i */ /pcooo U F10 ro, TI O rt.aL. o prEN 9 FACi- / k lip // 9.Â¥E qu 1 tz.go eq ZON i rAG, 11 2 X // Mhq *te Â·03Â·,TM,1~4.T'â€¢O -r#cuour LoT ~4 k 0 fril/lillillit'i//lill/l/li-: 1 . / 901 2 1 Whhl. OF)rE.,4 eF'th<LIL / 2.TEQUIfi.fED SY 'ZOM'Ah / ~ 900 41 G Te<DAT \ 1-OCAT % O Â¥.4 l 1 1-1 4 1 1 1 i t 1 1 1 1 L aL Â»Â«104Â« MA -9,{ 44.TOIL. 2.yE.Qui rLE.rÂ·A eE,Â·AT ---~ 90' 8'- O" AL:Te ZAT , 01-~ 1 STGESET or; MALL . 6 LOT Co,-Ari,T\OrÂ« i 8,000 4 A - -nvw 30 1 a Â·a~alci S_r 12 â‚¬ E r- t ALL-9.9 'k 14 :!11 '1 tte 'irilljll;li 160 4-90 11'' ON/b- OrE'P*-N 1 1 /,SPAO,6, 2.E.Q~uiere.0 1:39 ZON'Ncl il/jiljil ; UN illitillill,/M4Y 'DE O 6-TrL' 6OTrer> 14)rWOUT L - A V C 22-9/2Â«,x Â» g. N R} 11111111'll'lll W j \00' P .6. 90' (O' i Mt,4 C)7'trj SPA<Lrâ‚¬.. 4 , 't' 12.EQUI,trec, Vibt~ 'ZON),-4 Gn -* f , 1000 it 0 F..115.0,-IT L.JOCAT,or.4 143 -uu > 1.1 --24.- '7-77-9- i 1 1 2, ( i r /,, t 1,1111 (,11 11 / 1 (,1 41;i -91 944444416Â»444Â»4 - - mi .. - 90, ~ 1-1.F?C. WAQU, 12.12 MIEr-tr V 1, 0501 8'-d' ALTFE.fLATI OM 1 .sT 12-12 ET ort- VaLL 9 LOT CONO '7 10'4 2.1,000 4 m 7-WW 110 1332116 or y Â«â€¢ ,,+ NÂ·a-,Â·.â€ž,Â·.4,â€¢t â€¢0 . Â«Â«ff h' ir LAT 2,00 r Xv 40\ -- * i 10 12-oof H - - CRAe,LE 52Â©0~ - t - jt 111 / / 1. t' Ill I W;HEEL/fL Opte. 40094 1 ,. a . . 1//Willill/jilill $- 1 ~,4---EXIST-t ZON,M* COorâ€¢E RE,ANT LIM,T -. Il/11111/11 / 1 & to' 1 -0 4,aicâ„¢T 19 NOT A Car#e,TOPE~Â»-LOA OF U.ECÂ· An -1'442 92.TESENT CODE 'FrR. rÂ»Ur,MTS A.MY HEW 3940+44 79Â·CM ONTErttJâ€¢3~,4 Â¥22Â»4* -1-UN. -0 44#1444.T CF -T#Â¥0 MAJ<39- 447*fipÂ·) 16,4 84116=lht(,6 -- W'1140Â»4 -Tr|Â£ 4.012.2. ARJEA ST 2-11ET LEViaL rgb 63' AlÂ»\Na\94\\\Â»\Â»i:I t.. MATUIAL-I ' Exr,osed :ide and rcat' (?]evi: i,lons sh,u } 1. lr-! ct' i.-it,Iilie:i.1. prileriaLS as the front iacade or of : Â£- I . ' -c, Bâ€¢Â·Â·r,~â€¢Arte.,BA color or niater-ial anal-onous to the front J ac.=:do. .'.ny street or mall facade shall L .L/, 1. 1.,-k Â£ uu a front facade. Building materials other than brick, cut, stone or claphoard siding shall be of a nature and + n.,- 4 9,--I y) Al- to detract from the signi ficance and character of the historic buildings within U U- 6â€¢"41 t.. 0 'v W t t.he dislrict. Hip or .uÂ·bled roofs shall be standing rib sheet metal, wood or composition shingles, or suitable , facrimi le thereof. Gther materials shall be reviewed by the }Iistoric Preservation Con.Uttec. C - "f --1--T-- F 0 11 1.11 1 _ -1' 1 . 11 DE-732 _-121.- 21 1- 11 /1 11 1 1 11 2Eli.ji_7-LrUL=.f[33[~3 +-c'n, t--A-~ 11-1[---CUTI III . , 11.11 Il & H Il H i 6.-1 r -31 b N *1 1 11 il Â»-11-it-1 V- 5 li '1 11-If- T H 1 1 1 -11 11 11. 11 0 U d : 1 . . t 11 -K .. 11 - 11 4 li 1 Ir-Ii=[--11 9/--iF - tr-11 11 3.--177~ 4 11 'U, 2 11 H 0 4 1 H 11 lilli lili TE '[.L '.1 11 7~~~E+-7 11 1, M 0.0 iti 8 "n E.il "tia n 1[- -1 N.H H H. H U 1 1 0 1 n 0 2. i 4 . 1[ 1[ I JI 11 11. !1 11 11 11 11 15 4 .. i 0 .1 11[lin - 11 11 11 .1 11 11 1 lili _ 1[ 1 i U 11 "B12- 1 Cy<- ACCEPTABLE 1 Â· Â·Â· .. Ill U - 1 1 1.- -~-1 : 1 1.LIZZE ........ ..... .. 1 1.1 E-! r - i 1-r r=Â·1~. ~-i-~ -~"tI-*_pi= 4.1 1 1 ..'IL, 0 CUT STONry_ (ASHL.412- MALONRY) Ac C E.P-r,6-9>LE- 101+94 _ Dal Â·--!CLL_Â£*2~6; . 1[&~ie*mitbz0---!f~. 1 h -JL=1(-4[)L===iC>Â·=,r "- --0*98&65-iU__11 . Ir n.-, 1==fÂ»30 -7/0) L a:Fgh,jibci 20/1/,SFOCC)-6'9- r====<faJ Â· -iC:=:cou - 'L_. -Lor =r 4~ . =Â«=0Â«ZEFF - L.13 0Â©0*39}a=: . rh tt:===-ilii)(9-5~ - 1_21 -U . -C-1~1gia - -_0_Ir--- iÂ· _Â·_*---w-,l .InÂ·. f-7 Â· _LTTE 1 Â·- ' Â¥200 44+ 970 HE C.2.Use,LE MASON 12-Y 1-4 OT ACC EPTAWbLE- 6/, 44 - CLAPBOAW-0 5\ OrrÂ·Â·let 1-1 -1 1!J : . -1 . 1 i = . ! i I 1- L f k R Jy~/71-/ 41 41/01 4043 - V L-t ' 3 1 4.- 1 1 -{ f / -9. 69 ~uth may 262 6~019â€¢z~ed ~| '* ~ ~ ~ 3.. " 574 >40\194 11,8 SHEET METAL */000 02. COMPOe, \-T\Or-l â‚¬>H,M<kirES m - 1.j:U Al. 1.3 3' Fenestrations above the first floor shall be greater in vertical dimensions than horizontal. 41* Building details, if used, shall be oriented to fenestrations, corners, roof lines and at floor levels Proposed admendment Overall visual impression of fenestration above the first floor shall be greater in vertical dimensions than horizontal. 91Â¥ADEC) Arzâ€¢Fz:A- 2~Q,re_,4, 02.'ENTATION - - 11. 3 f f 4 . 1 jl \1:.If , I'll i \ N 1.1// 137 \ It 47 4 1,11,1 2 / I T>I-,j 1- 6 t.fr../ nE.I.* - '1 1 1,1 /4 0 47 == 3 , 1 P f 4,1 ===- M i' 1,4 -*---+ .7 1'1 1 j f . -94 4 f & 4 1 ~ 1 4 1 1 1 ----- 17 ' 2 f 4 I.......I. --I.*I- I--1- i. " d ... ./ /9 , ~9 722 - - ' ' .1 14 ,Â« 9, al 7 :1~ i] 'i 7 y ff 3 34 19 -4 1:. 1 It 11 2 A 3 k f 1 y / 1 6 1 9 94/9 4 4/4/ f, /4 -=*- r i ,; . u ---4- - .1 3- f f /4 /,- /, .4 0 1 // 4~.if k../,7 i lili, IE. 11 f // / 4 0 '' f # 13-JIT-IL- ig -- - If / Nor ACCEPTABLE "11 Â·'-1'N 'l' thT. 'hÂ·tl, F,! Â·Â·In!)1 'rl' 1...1 UilÂ·i Ul' : illl, 1/.1 4,11.1., . 4. i:q~,pew construction or remodeling :hall :inve e...posed structural skeletal ele:r.ents otler than -*ioad !;carin., walls . . t %- 4 ;00......0.00.* - Acc a en-Â»dÂ©tr-- ' >1 1 .-. 41 > Z 2 1/ Â«/ NOT A C C EPT A 8 LE. , CIr' 11 1 1 SCA, .. ; ti i..~.ul'jil.C~ 5. ibrehen r..nci st,oops shali yint. excr,c:.1 20 fret along any facade. Balconies shal L not project DÂ·Â·Nond the build i ng fac.Â·ide. PQ I MaiLY F:4 Crl D rE_ -, , '!11'llill E- -- I il Ill Et 1 1.22 1 , 12/la--2 T -- 2 1111,1. 1-1U]_1-* -!111~.F 2 - --2-=2 ==1- 10 MAX ~ 'Pbac,Vet & STcope 12 2,1\-coM i ft-5 A ccia- PTArt,L.rE- 7 prz,MA rLY 'FAC.4 0 ret #1 1 1 OVE*99////3 1 4 3Â«H] 1 1Â®1.1-11 Ila T 22.LIZEâ‚¬]-b -3- "ill-~-1- -+7- eL=-1---1 'Efle=1 El..__. 14% T 14-1 1 KI [-] 1 Ill-'fa I I l [* 9 )74-__. \/ ////1 LE---7--m ' I-3 1-2 1.-1 1 11!1-[-1 [I ff{-11% T :EER It!11111 11- 1-= /51- 1 11[ -11 1--Il [--[I[[ [I- -"-1--- ----1-F =i r ---2- 1 fl -2-1 ----- - iiI ----- -- - 56(2.944,2,9 5 '57.30 FS r64.L CO N 1 E S No-1- Acc-MeTAa,LE. , CE.EE) - ;-- ~- i~ 11\fi\\\:\\\\Â».1\Â»6\\\Â»\ 3 T IÂ·'' L.Â· ' Â£,Uil . I Thinted front faca:les shall not. exceed 90 fect without a color or textured alt,crath,n. 7. Colors, values, intensity and color placement, being considered a valid controversial artistic embellishment and having ail intimate relationship to all the foregoing criteria, - shall '0-: subject to review by the Historic Preservation Committee. 1,1 A NA ; HISTORIC NOTIFICATION R NS 6 -4 -7 1 CONSENT Mountain States Communications Lena Van Lvon Paragon - Roaring Fork Arms Roaring Fork Condo City of Aspen Mary Helen Cattell Prospector Lodge A. J. Moran RBH Joint Venture OBJECT Helen T. White Elks Lodge MISCELLANEOUS Walter C. Stroud - no longer owners of property referred to for designation Stein Ericson - return sent but reply not expected till late July due his being out of town. MAILINGS RETURNED Aspen Lumber & Supply - Roswell, New Mexico Russell Volk - Denver, Colorado HISTORIC BUILDINGS OF DEN f, - c~ #'jl r Survey Inventory Wame of Building Aspen Times Original Name Present Owner Mountain States Original Owner fle.Q.r;i~e...Plonlb]-2:1Â£1._a nti Communications the H. P. & P. Company Present Use ' Newspaper Publicati.on Original Use The Paper & Paint Co. Date of Construction 1905 Location: (legal description & street address) The E + of L, 111 of M, and the W 10' of N, Block 79 310 East Main Street Physical Description. Vall Construction No. of Stories Physical Condition - Endangered Interior ExtcÂ£3or --I ... Remarks. (notable features. historical mignificance, etc.) The existing improvements to the property were recorded in the Pitkin County Tax Rolls in 1906. Shown as the owner of the property was Edward Kuhn, whilg George Morthland and the H. P. & P. Company were shown as owners 0/ the improvements. Both the building and the property were purchased in 1911 by the Aspen Democrat Times. The Aspen Weekly Times, established in 1881, was purchased by B. Clark Wheeler in 1883. This paper was aciverti.sed as "the oldest paperlin N. W. Colorado" and sold at a cost of $2.00 a year. The Aspen Daily Times was not established until 1835. Offices for these early newspapers were located on Cooper Avenue, and the appear- ance of the Aspen Times building today closely resembles this earlber structure which is pictured in the August 23, 1889 issue of the Aspen Daily rimes. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Assessor's office andtthe Treasurer's office. Aspen Daily Times Articles: 7/ 3/86 pg. 2 col. 1 11/20/86 pg. 1 col, 2 1/ 1/87 pg. 2 col. 4 1/ 4./87 pg. 4 col. 6 9/18/86 pg. 1 col. 3 2/19/89 pg. 2 col. 1 8/23/89 pg. 3 col. 3, 4 12/27/91 ps. 1 col. 7 2/ 1/93 IE. 3 col. 7 2/ 4/93 pg. 7 col. 5-7 2/25/93 pg. 3 col.5-7 Date: May 30, 1974 Name of researcher * Aspen Historical Society Research Committee ' HISTORIC BUILDINGS O SPEN 1 . Survey Inventory Name of Building Hotel Jerome Original Name Hotel .Tornmn Present Owner John Gilmore Original Owner Jerome B. Wheeler Present Use Hotel Original Use Hotel Date of Construction 1889 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 79, Lots Q, R, & S 320 East Main Street Physical Description. Wall Construction Brick with sandstone trim around the sills No. of Stories Three Physical Condition Endangered Interior Exterior - - Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 10/11/88 Arrangements completed for the new hotel 10/12/88 C. H. Jacobe and M. C. Jacobs transfer property known as "Jacobs Corner to J. B. Wheeler 3/ 4/89 Contract let 3/25/89 Foundation poured 4/11/89 Foundation completed 8/23/89 Hotel to be ready for owner by September first 11/27/89 The grand opening, Thanksgiving eve 12/12/89 Elevator arrived Jerome Be Wheel.er had the foresight to recognize that Aspen would support a large and grand hotel. The Jerome cost an estimated $160,000 to complete. It was both elegant and expensive, but it was a building tnat Aspen regarded with special. pride. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Interviews with long-time residents of Aspen Aspen Daily Times Articles: 9/25/88 pg. 4 col. 5 8/23/89 pg. 4 col. 4 7/ 2/91 pg. 4 col. 6 10/ 9/88 pg. 4 col. 5 8/31/89 pg. 4 col. 3, 4 9/ 6/91 pg. 4 col. 10/11/88 pg. 4 col. 4 10/30/89 pg. 4 col. 3 9/13/91 pg. 6 col. 10/12/88 pg. 4 col. 4 11/ 9/89 pg. 4 col. 2 3/ 2/92 pg. 4 col. 9/ 1/89 pg. 4 col. 4 11/29/89 pg. 4 col. 2 3/26/92 pg. 4 col. 3/ 4/89 pg. 4 col. 2 11/25/89 pg. 2 col. 4 5/8 /92 pg. 2 col. 3/ 9/89 pg. 4 col. 3 12/ 6/89 pg. 4 col. 2 5/10/92 pg. 6 col. 2-9 3/22/89 pg. 4 col. 2 12/12/89 pg. 4 col. 3 5/14/92 pg. 5 col. 4 3/25/89 pg. 4 col. 3 3/27/90 pg. 4 col. 4 6/24/92 pg. 6 col 5 4/11/89 pg. 4 col. 3 1/1/ 91 pg. 4 col. 5 1/ 1/93 Pg. 16 col. 3 5/18/89 pg. 4 col 3 2/ 5/91 pg. 4 col. 2 7/26/89 pg. 4 col. 5 3/ 8/91 pg. 6 col. 5 Date: May 1, 1974 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee r 1 â€¢ 4 4 #18 HOTEL JEROME The Hotel Jerome, located on what was formorly known as Jacobs Corner, was forrally opened on Thanksgiving eve, 1889, with a grand ball and banquet. It was a gala evening with distinguished guests arriving from as far away as New York. Many society events were to follow in the luxurious atmosphere provided by the hotelfs decor. The walls were tintcd and frescoed, the floors tiled. There were antique chairs upholstered in leather and rany fine fur- nishings. The rotunda was ceiled with colored cathedral glass, giving beautiful and subducd light. The estirated cost of the Hotel. Jerome was $100,000 with $25,000 Bllocated to the furnis.hings. The hotel had been the visicn of Jerone B. Wheeler.- It' wasÂ·said-to tivali.the hotels:of ~Â· 'r-:r-rt Paris, and was the Pride of Aspen. Throughout the early 190055, the hotel rer:.ined open under M-ansor Elisha' s guidance when many other buildings were forced to close. In the 1940's Walier ke'cke bought the hotel, painted it, added the swimming pool, and hired a popular chef, Arnold Semn Although much of the interior grandeur is gone today, the hotel continues to attract the attention of local residents and visitors alike, end rerains a nostalgic land.mark. Name of Building -12 rehe Ritchie Hse. Original N, same a) David Kunz 'presbnt Owner Svea Elisha Original Owner b) Mansor Elisha Present Use Residential Original Use same Date of Construction a)1887 b)1902 Location: (legal description & street address) a) Block 80, Lot D b) Block 80, Lot C, 4-B 315 Main Street Physical Description. Wall Construction Two frame houses No. of Stories one Physical Condition Endangered Interior Exterior Remarks: (notable features, historical significance. etc.) a) The Elisha's bought this house from a Mr. Everet, who now lives in Colorad.0 Springs, when Lawrence and Svea were married. The kj.tchen was extended a-nd a cell].ar added by the Elisha's, There have been no other structural changes For many years the house WP. S painted white. Today it is grey. b) Jacob Buffehr, Lawrence Elisha's great grandfather from Germany, buil-. this house for Lawrence' s parents, Mansor and Lenora Elisha, when they were married in 1902. Mr, Everet was their neighbor and good friend at this time. Later, when the Elisha's bought the Hotel Jerome they lived there, and rented their house to the Ritchies. The Ritchies lived in this house for so mayy years that it came to be known as the Ritchie House. Ownership, however, has always remained in the Elisha family. This was the first house to be built in Aspen Published Sourcess (author, title, page, date)i.n many years, and there were some people who wondered about the advisability of 04 building it. Court House reoords from the Treasurer's office and the Assessor's office Date: May 15, 1974 Raina of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 1 0 IiISTORIC BUILDINGS 01Â·' PEN Survey Inventory Uarde of Building Original Name Present Owner Lena Van Loon Original Owner Thos. Hinea Present Use Residence Original Use same Date of Construction 1888 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 80, Lot A 305 East 14ain Strret Physical Description; Wall Construction Frame Lio. Of Stories one Physical Condition Endangered Interior _ Exterjor -- Remarks. (notable features, historical significance, etc.) Mr. and Mrs Van Loon bought their house from Frank and Eileen Crawley for $500.00 in 1918, Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Treasurer's office and the Assessor's office Date: 5/7/74 laine of Researcher Â·, Aspen Historical Society Research Committee - H , name, of Building El s Original Nat 6.'.- Pfesent Owner Svea Elisha Original Owner J. M. MeMichad] Present Use Clothing Store Original Use Date of Construction 1888 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 80, Lot I 101 South Mill Physical Description; Wall Construction Wood with Brick No. of Stories One Physical Condition Endangered Interior Exterior Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) Long time Aspen residents remember the building now known as El.lios. fondly as Chris Anderson's Candy Store, a popular business during .the early 1900's. In 1930, Lloyd Ward maintained. his assay office there. Bilt, then the building stood empty for a number of years, and it wasn' t until Elli' s was established in the 1950's that the bui].ding again acheived a secure p].ace in Aspen's business community. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 10/16/86 pg. 1 col. 2 Date: May 1, 1974 laine of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 5 Name of Building Ch ood Block Original N 3 Ll ncoln Block ' E 'Pnesent Owner Ernst & Wilma Martins Original Owner Margaret Lincoln Present Use Restaurant, Small Original Use Young Men's Christian Shops & Apartments Association Date of Construction 1891 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 87, Lots A, 13 1004106 South Mill. Street Physical Description; Wall Construction Red Brick no. of Stories Two Stories Physical Condition Endangered Interior Exterior Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) February 1891 A new brick building on the S, E. corner of Mill & Main was planned. November 1891 The second story walls were about half completed. March 1892 Used first hy the YMCA, the building was opened to young men in the area. A yearly membership fee of $6.00 entit].ed one to useÂ·of two reading rooms furnished with magazines and 500 'tcarefully selected" books, use of another room set aside for social amusement and equipped with tables for checkers, chess and dominoes, and use of 3 bath rooms. The buil.ding had cost $8,000 to build. In the early 1900's Joseph=R. Chitwood purchased this building and it became known as the Chitwood Block. Mr. Chitwood and.his fami].y maintained their residence in the building and rented rooms. A mechanics shop was opened downstairs. Walter Paepke bought the building for back taxes in 1947. Published Sources: (authory title, page, date) Court House records from theTreasurer's office and the Assessor's office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 2/17/91 pg. 4 col. 4 11/ 1/91 pg. 6 col. 2 3/ 4/92 pg. 4 col. 2 3/21/92 pg. 4 col, 6 6/19/92 pg. 8 col. 6 6/24/92 pg. 6 col. 3 7/ 1/92 pg. 6 col. 4 1/ 1/93 Pg. 20 col. 3 Date: 5/1/74 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee i 6 ' HISTORIC BUILDINGS OF AbrEN Survey Inventory ' Name of Building The Rectory Original Name The Catholic Parochial Residence Present Owner The Catholic Church Original Owner The Catholic Church Present use Catholic Rectory Original Use Parochial Residence Date of Construction 1988 Location: (legal description 5 street address) Block 93, Lots A, B Physical Description Uall Construction Red Brick no. of Stories Physical Condition -__ Endangered Interior Exterior Remarks. (notable features, historical significance, etc.) Thl s unusually handsome brick structure was built during the summer of 1888, to serve as the Catholic parochial residence. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 7/19/88 pg. 4 col. 4 Date: May 30, 1974 Name of Researcher. Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 4-1 , HISTORIC BUILDINGS OF ASPEN Survey Inventory Name of Building St Mary's Catholic Original Name same Church Present Owner Catholic Church Original Owner rame Present Use as a Catholic Church Original Use same Date of Construction 1891 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 93, Lots A through I 104 South Galena Physical Description. I * Wall Construction Brick No. of Stories Two stories high with a dimension of 54' by 100' Physical Condition - -Endangered -Interior Exterior Remarks; (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 7/18/91 The ground fer the new Catholic Church was broken. 8/23/91 Foundation iralls were complt-ted. 11/11/9i Brick walls were finished. 1/16/92 A large shipment of furniture arrived. 2/ 2/92 Father Malone came from Denver for the Baptism of the Belle 3/18/92 Rev. Father Mafreveny of Denver delivered the address at the dedication of the new church, The Catholic Chirch was completed at a cost of- $18,000. Red oak pews from Grand Rapids, Two gothic windows, portraits of St. Fra'.cis & St. Edward in stainnd g].ass, and the bell weighing .2,000 pounds that had been made in a foundry in Cir,cinatti were special].y noted acquisitions that reD,ain within the structure today. This Church contjnues today, as it always has, tb serve the Catholic congregation of Aspen, Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Teasurer's office and the Assessor's office Aspen Dai ly Times Articles: 1/ 1/87 pg. 4 col. 3 5/30/92 pg. 5 col. 2 1/ 1/90 pg. 2 col. 7 6/16/92 pg. 6 col. 1 7/18/91 pg. 4 col. 3 1/ 1/93 pg. 5 col. 1 8/23/91 pg. 6 col. 1 1/15/93 pg. 5 col. 3 11/ 1/91 pg. 6 col. 2 1/24/92 pg. 4 co]. 1 1/16/92 pg. 4 col. 2 2/ 2/92 pg. ~ col, 4 2 2/27/92 pg. 4 col. 4 Date: 5/1/74 Name of Researcher: AP.pen Historical Society Research Committee HISTORIC BUILDINGS Or PEN Survey Inventory t Jame of Building Chatfield House Original Name Catherine Browf Present Owner William & F]orenco Original Owner H. P. Ccuier tl<122-1_ Beaumont Present Use Residential Original Use Small Bus.iness Date of Construction 1886? Location- (legal description & street address) Block 80, Lot K 302 East Hyman Physical Description Uall Construction a frame house No. of Stories one Physical Condition _ Endangered __Interior ExteÂ£ 3 or - V- Remarks. (notable features, historical Sionifirance, etc.) In the Aspen Daily T jmes paper published on July 30, 1847, an advortisement was printed for Morgan & Crowder, sign writing and decorative pri ntt:rs, 702 Hyfrian, This structure has been a residence for many years, howev,er. One family oplarred the kitchen and put in the cell.ar. Todai, this Si':all whit-e house js still cne of the prettiest with its gingerbread trim to be folind in Aspen. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House records from the Treasurer' s office and the Assessor' s office Aspen Dailv Ti ines Articles: 7/3/08? pg. 3 col. 6 Date: 5/16/74 Name of Researcher t Aspen Historical. So,jety Research Committee % I HISTORIC BUILDINGS Or EN Survey Inventory Wame of Building . Original Name Catherine Brown & Present Owner Dorothy Kel ] aher Original Owner H, P, an'.~prthn,fen _ i Present Use Original Use Residential Date of Construction 1887 Locationt (legal description & street address) B].ock 80, Lot M Physical Description Vall Construction frame No. of Stories one Physical Condition - -Endangered Interior Exterior Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) The property and the 1 murovements were owned by Catherine Brown and }i. P. Cowanhoven from 1885 to 1893. After a succession of many ow,-,ey.Â·: , '.1- :Â· property was sold by Lanora and John L. Healey to Frank and Doris Willowughty in 1948, The Wi.11.ougnbyÂ°s in turn sold it + o Dorothy Kellaher, t.he present owner in 1965. The building is presently being remodeled. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Treasurer's office and the Assesser's office Date: May 30, 1974 lame of Researcher t Aspen Historical Society Research Committee .. HISTORIC BUILDINGS OF ASPEN Survey Inventory liarde of Building La Cocina Original Name Present Owner Dere-thy -K:el 1 aher Original Owner J. Harkins Present Use Melican_Restallrant- OFiginal Use Residential Date of Construction 1887 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 80, Lot N 308 East Hopkins Physical Description Wall Construction frame, lirotected with white paint No. of Stories one story Physical Condition - -Endangered Interior F.stci 3 or Remarks. (notable features, higtorical mignifirance, etc.) The Assessor's Records for the Fe-ir 1894 valÂ·,19 Lot N, Block 30 at $43,00. There was no assesgment for any improvements to the property at that time. However, the records for the folloÂ·,ring year, and the year 1886, hoth list improvements to the property as being worth 3150.00. This figure rose in the r,-:cords of 18Â·27 to $250,00, and in 1888 to 4300.00. In 1889 the value was again Iraintained as 3300.00. As the actual building would have taken place in the year prior to the appeararce of the information in the records, it is most likely that building was begun or; this property in 1884 and completed three years later in 1887. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Date: May 30,1974 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 0 HISTORIC BUILDINGS Or - SPEN Survey Inventory Name of Building The Hutch Original Name Present Owner Dhopne & Margaret Original Owner Anna Kraft. ? Johnson Present Use Small Shop Original Use Resident.lal Date of Construction 1887 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 80, Lot 0 316 East Hopkins Physical Description : Uall Construction No. of Stories Physical Condition - Endangered Interior Ehtel i or Remarks; (notable features, historical qi-Â£11)i fi cance. etc. ) For many years this house was owned by Lenora Buffehr Healy, Jacob Buffehr'S daughter. During the 20's & 30's !Â·irs. Healy's sister, Lulu Wilson lived here. . Published Sources.- (author, title, page, d.ate) Court House Records from the Treasurer's office and the Assessor's office Date: May 16, 1974 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Conuqi.ttee IiISTOI'.IC BUILDINGS Or 'EN - Survey Inventory dame of Building Isis Original Name Webber Bill,ling___ Present Owner James A. Parsons Original Owner tiennE._Webher_-_- Present Use Movie Theatre Original Use Date of Construction 1892 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 87, Lots M&N 406 East Hopkins Physical Description iall Construction Red Brick, a square and sturdy structure No. of Stories Two Physical Condition _ Endangered -Interier Exterior Remarks. (notable features, historical significance, etc.) Throughout June and July, the work on the new Webber block progress rapidly and smmothly Published Sources: (aÂ·:thor, title, page, date) Court. House Record form the Assessor's pffice and the Treasurer's 9ffico Aspen Daily Times Articles: 6/29/92 pg. 8 col. 7 7/ 2/92 pg. 8 col. 7 Date; 5/9/74 Name O-3 Researcher. Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 1O Name of Building Original N Ir , Present Owner Milton C. Conner Original Owner S. W. Keene Present Use Residential Original Use same Date of Construction Lot 9 - 1887 R&S- 1891 Locations (legal description & street address) Block 93, Lots Q, R, S-3 houses 534 East Hopkins Physical Description; Wall Construction frame No. of Stories single Physical Condition Endangered Interior Exterior il*Ip4- .ull---i. Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) The property was purchased from Andrew Webber by Milton Conner in 1923. The houses remain virtually the same today, with no add.i.tions or alterations having been made to them since they were built. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House records from the Treasurer'e office and the Assessor's office Date: 5/15/74 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 11 I . HISTORIC BUILDINGS OP ASPEN Survey Inventory Wame of Building Berko' s Studio Original Name Present Owner Egrfnk & Minte Berko Original Owner L. C, Wellman Present Use Toy Shop & Photograph-Original Use Residential. â‚¬rgs Studio Date of Construction 1889 Location- (legal description & street address) Block 81, Lot C 309 East Hopkins Physical Description 1?all Construction Brick No. of Stories One Physical Condition - Endangered Interio: ENteljor Remarks. (notable features, historical qi.qâ€ži.fi can.O, etc. ) From 1884 to 1892 Lots A through E in Block 81 were all, owned by Luther C. Wellnuan. The Assessor's records in the yeEr 1889 list Lot C as valued at $600.00 with only $10.00 worth of improvements, However, in 1890, the improvements increase in value substantially to 3250.00, Since Lilly Reid bought this house in 1937 and lived here for many years, this house is still known to many Aspenites as the Lilly Reid House. Published Sourcess (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Date: May 30, 1974 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee I 1 'HISTORIC BUILDINGS OF EN Â¥. Survey Inventory Name of Building Sabbatini Sport Original Name The Wei nberg Block Present OAner Alessandro & Thelma Original Owner Louis Weinhere.__ Sabbatini Present Use Sports Shop Original Use -Telenbane_Qffice Date of Construction 1890 Location: (legal description S street address) Block 88, Part of Lots A, B 208 South Mill Physical Description. Wall Construction A modest structure of Brick No. of Stories Two Physical Condition -Endangered Interior Exterjor Remarks; (notable features, historical significance, etc.) Crawley's Grocery Store, a popular establishment, continued in this location into the 1920's when the Crawley's, by then an elderly couole, retired. The Telephone Co, offices remained upstairs but the lower floor was empty. After , the war, Mike Magnifico opened a ski shop and shoe repair here, while he and his family lived in an apartment upstairs. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Treasurer's office and the office of the Assessor Aspen Daily Times Articles 1/1/91 pg. 2 col. 4 Date: 5/9/74 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 11 1 . HISTORIC BUILDINGS Or ASPEN Survey Inventory Name of Building Aspen Lumber Original Name C.pllins Blnelr Present O.mer Aspen Lumber & Supplyoriginal Owner _Samtipl C.. Collins- CO. Present Use Hardware Store Original Use Stores & Offices- Date of Construction 1892 Location: (legal description Â£ street address) Block 88, North part of Lots A, B 204 South Mill Street Physical Description. Vall Construction Brick trimmed with Sandstone No. of Stories Two Physical Condition Endangered -Interior . Ester .inr Remarks. (notable features, historical significance, etc.) Plans for this building were known as early as August 23, 1891. In the course of construction, disagreement arose between Samuel G. Collins and the Carver.ters Union. It wasn't until February of 1893 that this dispute was settled and the Aspen Daily Times recommended "a liberal patronage to the bui 1ding", The Overn Book and Stationary Store was located here at the turn of the century, For many years it was a furniture store and mortuary'; Tom Sardy, a mortician, purchased the building in 1938. As his hardware store grew, Mr. Sardy e xpanded the store and moved the mortuary to Main Street. After the war, the building was purchased by Mr. Paepke, who added the lamber company across the street, Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 3/1/88 pg. 12/20/88 pg. 2 col. 6 8/23/91 pg. 6 col. 1 7/ 8/92 pg. 5 col. 2 2/11/93 pg. 5 col. 6 9/18/98 pg. 3 col. 1 Date: 5/9/74 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee - 1 IIISTORIC BUILDINGS OF El! Survey Inventory , dame of Building Brand 81]ilding Original Name Hymnn Block - Mary Kelley, Otis Present Owner liarlen_BaldiÂ·Lin _ -__ Original Owner -Nr.11 Ui.&._D._.El---C-Brown Present Use B=iness: Small.__ Original Use Business- A-Soci al-_Or.ganizatio Shops and Offices First National Bank. P. O. S. Date of Construction __.2.891 of A., and of- fines Locaticn (legal description & street address) Block 88, Lots H, 1 203 South Galena Physical Description. Uall Construction Peachblow Sandstone lio. of Stories Two stories, fronting on Hopkins and Gale:ia Physical Condition - -Endangered Interior E x L e r j or -- Remarks. (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 2/17/91 Plans for the new Hyman Block drew the at.te:ition of builders 7/ 4/91 A ] an,pe force or workman had been employed, and progress was bei ng maÂ·de 8/23/91 Walls were nearly comp] tied 11/ 1/91 At a cost of $30,000, the new Hyman Block was ready for occupency 11/2/ 91 The First Na tional Ranks established in Aspen iii 1886, .served abundant amounts of Â·the finest clarets and champaurne to celebrai.e the opening of their new and elegarr offices. The furniture purcliased for the bank was of antique oak . All the tri mmings and cagings were of polished brass. 11/14/91 The Patrlotic Order Sons of America, formed for "socieiv purposes & social gatherings", rented the large hall on the 2nd floor. To celebrate their opening a reception and dance was given by the order. Offices on the 2nd floor were filled by Published Sourcess (a-:thor, title, page, clate.) Aaron Helms, A.L. Lewis and others. Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the TreasurerÂ°s office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 1/17/91 pg. 4 col. 4 11/14/91 pg. 4 col. 3 7/ 1/91 pg. 2 col. 1 12/ 8/91 pg. 2 col. 1 7/ 4/91 pg. 4 col. 3 1 / 1/92 pg. 4 col. 1 8/12/91 pg. 4 col 3 1 / 6/92 pg. 2 col. 1 8/23/91 pg. 6 col. 1 1 / 1/93 pg. 5 col. 4, 5 11/ 1/91 pg. 6 col. 2 1 /14/93 pg. 3 col. 1 11/ 2/91 pg. 4 col. 4 2 / 1/93 Pg. 2 col. 1 11/ 7/91 pg. 2 col. 1 11/ 3/91 pg. 3 col. 2, 3 Aspen Week].y Timest 11/ 8/91 pg. 4 col. 4 5 / 1/86 pg. 1 col. 3 Date: 5/7/74 Rame of ResearcherÂ·, Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 1>\ i HISTORIC BUILDINGS Or A N Survey Inventory Warae of Building Original Name Present Owner Jim Parson Original Owne-r mrs, Flnrenre Brnnks Present Use Residential Original Use Residential Date of Construction 1889 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 94, Lot D Physical Description Wall Construction frame lio. of Stories one Physical Condition -Endangered -Interior _PsteÂ£ 3 or Remarks. (notable features, hi.storinal qi.gui.finance, etc.) Assessments for this property as pald by Mrs. Brooks included $300.00 for the lot, and $50.00 for in*rovements each year for the years 1886 - 89, In 1090 the val.ua- tior of the improvements increased to 200, while the valuation of the preÂ·per ty doubled,i Jim Parson's bought this house in 1938. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office. Date: May 30, 1974 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 1-3 IIISTORIC BUILDINGS OF AC}PER Survey Inventory aame of Building Original Name Present Owner Jjm Parsons Original Owner Chnrlpe T.. Todd Present Use Resldential Original Use Rps;riential Date of Construction 1885 Location: (legal description Â£ street address) Block 94, I,ot E Physical Description: 'Iall Construction No. of Stories Physical Condition - Endangered Interior EN. teller Remarks; (notable features, historion! vigni.firance, etc.) Improvements to the property were valued at $100.00 in the Assessor's records from 1885 through 1888. Jim Parsons, the present owner, purchased the house and the land in 1938. Published Sources. (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Date: May 30, 1974 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 15 HISTORIC BUILDINGS C SPEN . Survey Inventory Name of Building blo&\~c___UAL Original Name .In prner<â‚¬ Present Owner Shnu, Original Owner A be<r,1 Present Use -r-2.g~una n4 Original Use re sea t.6,2 c~ . Date of Construction Location: (legal descrip-tion 5 street address) 8,6ck 91 - 6-r M - Tr Â£ 09 4 Physical Description. Wall Construction No. of Stories Physical Condition __Endangered Interior Exterior - Remarks: (notable features. historical significance, etc.) , Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Date: Name of Researcher: IIISTORIC BUILDINGS 01 PEE Survey Inventory Name of Building Danny's Original Name Kobev Block _ Present Owner Larry Ferguson Original Owner Mrs, C, E, ric.ble Present Use Night Club Original Use Shops & Off lges Date of Construction 1888 Locaticn: (legal de3cription i street address) Block 88, Lot Q 426 East Hyman Physical Description. Wall Construction No. of Stories Physical Condition - -Endangered Interior Ex teri or Remarks; (notable features, historical szgniricance, etc.) Rachofsky, Kobey & Co. was established for business in the Kobey Block during 1892, as was the Aspen Pharmacy. The Birds Eve Map of Aspen printed in 1693 places Mct'Iurchy & Swan's offices in the Kobey Block. During the pre-depres: sion years the Kobey Shoe and Clothing Store prosvered here. Mr, Hanson, who managed the drugstore on the corner would send the children of poor miners to Kobey' s and tell them to charge mittens and other woolens on his account. In the 1940' s the building continued as a department store under the direction of Francis Kalmas. Various restaurants; such as Mario's and Ed Brennan's ekbelent Chinese restaurant, have also met with success at this location. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records for the Treasurer's office ana the Assessor's Office Aspen Times Articles 9/1/87 PgÂ· 2 col. 3 6/18/92 pg. 3 col. 7 6/19/92 pg. 6 col. 6, 7 Date: 5/9/74 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 16 Â· Â· HISTORIC JUILDINGS Or ..LPER Survey Inventory Name of Building Woods Building Original Name Keene Block Present Owner Justine &_Ron_son Original Owner S. W. Kenne- W. Woods, Jr. Present Use Drug Store Original Use Book & 3 ta t i or ..rv Store, Offices Date of Construction 1887 - 1888 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 88, South 75' of S, 432 East Hyman Physical Description: Wall Construction Painted Brick No. of Stories One. Before the fire in 1918, the building was Two stories. Physical Condition Endangered __Interior Exteijor Remarks. (notable features, historical mi.gnificance, etc.) 11/ 6/87 The foundation was nearly completed. 11/ 8/87 Having secured the contract on the Keene Block, Kessler & Harding were looking for more carpenters 12/ 4/87 The first story walls were finished. Stringers were being placed on them. 12/29/87 A metal roof was to be put on, 2/15/88 Keene Block nearing c impletion. 2/27/88 Carbary & Beard's Corner Book Store was one of the first occupants. 3/1/ 88 An addition to the Keene Block, to be ready in 60 days, was started. 10/12/88 Wells Fargo Express has opened its new office here. 1/ 1/90 Ford's Family Drug Stone, the first drug store in the Keene Block, opened. 7/15/92 The front of the Keene Block was artistically painted in red and gold. A fire in 1918 destroyed the second story, but the firtt floor was saved and has been Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) used as a drug store ever since always maintaining the - original family character. Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Aspen Daily Times Articlest 11/ 6/87 pg. 4 col. 4 2/27/88 pg. 4 col. 3 5/11/90 pg. 5 col. 2 11/ 8/87 pg, 4 col. 5 Â·2/28/88 pg. 4 col. 2 7/ 1/91 pg. 4 col. 1 11/10/87 pg. 4 col. 2 2/29/88 pg. 4 col. 3 7/22/91 pg. 4 col. 4 12/ 4/87 pg. 1 col. 5 3/ 1/88 pg. 4 col. 3 11/ 7/91 pg. 2 col. 1 12/29/87 pg. 4 col. 3 10/12/88 pg. 1 col. 7 4 7-9 1/25/88 pg. 1 col. 4 11/18/88 pg. 2 col. 6 1/ 1/92 pg. 2 col. 9 2/ 3/88 pg. 4 col. 4 7/19/89 pg. 4 col. 5 1/ 3/92 pg. 2 col. 8-9 2/ 4/88 pg. 4 col. 5 11/ 7/89 pg. 2 col. 1 6/23/92 pg. 5 col. 4 2/15/88 . pg. 4 col. 3 11/11/89 pg. 4 col. 3 7/15/92 pg. 8 col. 7 2/17/88. pg. 4 col. 3 1/ 1/90 pg. 4 col.1&4 1/ 1/93 Pg. 11 col. 2 2/19/88 pg. 1 col. 6 1/ 8/90 pg. 2 col. 1 2/ 1/93 pg. 8 col. 7 Date: 5/10/74 Name of Researcher. Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 16 IIISTORIC BUILDINGS OF ASPEN Survey Inventory Uame of Building Jake's Original Name Wheoler Blnrk Present Owner Robert Sproul]. Original Owner _A l' crl_.W.}lap 1 er Present Use Restaurant & Bar Original Use .28-1.Q.Q.:1-____ Date of Construction 1891 Location: (].egal description & street addre.ss) Block 88, Part of Lots R.and S 209 South Galena Physical Description- Ual.1 Construction Brick No. of Stories Two Physical Condition ___ -Endangered Interior Exterior - Remarks. (notable f eatures, historical significance, etc. ) 10/ 6/91 Albert Wheeler was irrartted Dermis,sion by the City Council to lise R part of the street a.id sidÂ·Â·â€žÂ·alks on Galena Street while crecting, Ms new brick block behind the Keene Block 11/10/91 Perristion is given by the City Council for a staircase at the rear of the building 12/20/91 The Wheel.er Block Ims completed at a cost of $5,000. The Abbey was first ovened by Stil.]son and Dumrzler on the corner of Gajana and Cooper jn 1888. WI,en Albert Wheeler bul-li4 the Wheeler Block in 1891, the Ab'Dev moved across L the street. to be the first occu.pants of this. very fine brick block. Ceo ocr' s Book Store was located here-during prohibition. b'it ditring the depression years the building stood pmpty, Since 1940 the Wheeler Block has been maintained by a succession Published Sources: (a:thor, title, page, date)of popular rest.aurants :ind night clubs, adding greatly tootbe color and charm of Asped's night life. Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Aspen D3ily Times Articles: 10/ 2/68 pg. 4 col. 5 10/ 6/91 ps. 4 col, 2 11/10/91 pg. 2 col. 2 6/ 19/92 pg. 3 cole 1 6/ 26/92 pg. 2 col. 7 2/ 12/93 pg. 8 col. 7 Date: May 6th, 1974 wame of Researcher. Aspen Historical Society Research Conmittee I7 NISTORIC BUILDINGS OF ASPEN Survey Inventory Name of Building the El.ks Building Original Name Webber B]ock Present Owner BPOE Elks Lodge 224 Original Owner Henrv Webber Elks Lodge, Small Business: Bank, Present Use Businesses, Offices Original Use Stores & Offices Date of Construction .1891- Location: (legal description & street address) Black 94, Lots K, L , M 210 South Galena Street Physical Description. Uall Construction Pink Sandstone from the Frying Pan Quarries and Pressed Brick No. of Stories 3 Physical Condition _ Endangered Interior Exterior .----- ----1 - Remarks. (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 1/ 1/91 The Webber Block was to be built at a cost of $40,000. Only the Wheeler Opera House and the Jerone Hotel cost inureÂ·. The \Iobber Block was to have steam heating, electric lighting and. "waterworks" in every roon. The large sup.re on the third. floor was to be fiii.ed for p. socieh, hal 1.- ,Â· 3/ 1/91 Tbe interior was being finished and the buil.din.g was reported to be a]-most read.v for occunancy. 8/ 6/91 Al] ants Drug S tore opened at the corner of Hymn Avenue and Galena Street. At the grand opening, pearly 1,000 lady visitors were givel souvenir bouquets. 5/ 3/92 The Aspen National Bank, new ow:,ers of the Web'ber Block- orer:ed their doors. for business, and the building became known as the "Bank Building". In 1926 the Post Office moved to this corner. Published Sources 1 (author, title, page, date) Court House records from the Treasurer's office and the Assessor's offi.ce AsT>en Daily T ines Articlest 2/ 7/93 PgÂ· 7 col. 1 1/ 1/92 pg. 4 col. 9 2/13/91 pg. 4 colo 3 2/ 5/93 PgÂ· 5 col. 4 11/ 8/91 pg. 4 col. 4 1/24/91 pg. 4 col. 1 1/13/93 Pg. 3 col. 1 11/ 2/91 pg. 4 col. 4 1/14/91 pg. 2 col. 5 1/ 1/93 PgÂ· 1 col. 5, 7 10/22/91 pg. 3 col. 3 1/ 1/91 pg. 2 col. 5 15 3 8/28/91 pg. 3 col. 1-3 17 5* 8/9/91 pg. 6 col. 6, 5 1/ 3/93 PgÂ· 8 col. 5 8/ 6/91 pg. 4 col. 2 7/ 3/92 pg. 3 col. 4 8/ 2/91 pg. 4 col. 5 5/ 3/92 p:, 4 col. 5,6,7 7/ 1/91 pg. 4 col. 7, 8 3/22/92 pg. 4 col. 7 4/17/91 pg. 4 col. 2 3/19/92 pg. 4 Colo 5 3/ 1/91 pgâ€¢ 6 col. 3 2/16/92 pg. 4 col. 5 2/13/91 pg. 4 col. 3 Date: May 1, 1974 Raina of Researcher: Aspen }Ii storical Society Research Committee \& LISTORIC BUILDINGS OF Api-EN Survey Inventory Warde of Building uncle Willy's Rpirlt Original Name House Present Owner r, T, C. Corporation Original Owner Jacob Brown Present Use T,irpier ftnrn Original Use Date of Construction 1885 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 89, E 14' of Lot C 413 East Hyman Physical Description- Wall Construction frame No. of Stories two Physical Condition - -Endangered Interior EN tc 1 3 0.2 Remarks : (notable features. historical qi.qui-ficance, etc.) The Browns sold the property with improvements to E. T. Butler in 1888. The improvements to the property were valued at $300.00 at this time. An ad printed in the Aspen Dail.y Times on December 13, 1891, for Raymond Reide's City Bakery gives the address as 413 Hyman Avenue, the same address as now given for Uncle Willy's. Another ad for Reide's City Bakery located at 413 Hyman Avenue can be found in the February 2, 1893 issue of the Aspen Daily Times. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office ~ Aspen Daily Times Articles 11/19/87 pg. 2 col. 3 11/15/87 pg. 3 col. 4 12/13/91 pg. 6 col. 6 2/ 2/93 Pgâ€¢ 7 col. 2 Date: May 30, 1974 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committ,ee 6.~ w J. V L-l ....~....6.--J 19 Â·NameÂ·of Building Pa. #gon Original Name Conenhoven & Brown Block Present Owner Roaring Fork Assoc. Original Owner _Flenars~_Cawnnhaven & Brown Present Use Bar Original Use Offices & Dry Goods estab- lishment Date of Construction 1889 Locationi (legal description & street address) Block 89, Lots F, G 423 East Hyman Physical Description: Wall Construction A brick building 60 x 100 feet. No. of Stories Three Physical Condition Endangered Interior Exterior Remarks : (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 6/17/89 The land was cleared for work to begin on the building designed for space for two large store rooms on the 1st floor and suites of offices on the second and third floors. 7/25/89 By July the foundation walls were nearly completed. 8/26/89 A large boiler arrived. 11/18/89 The Blue Wing Dining Parlours, an elegant hostelry modeled on the European plan opens. 3/18/89 Staats, Hunt & Co., a dry goods establichment opense Other occupants of the building at this time included Dro Go B. Stone, the Todd brothers and Owen Prentiss. The buil.ding was equipped with steam heat, water & lights, In the 1930's people voted here in Kay's Dept. store. Council meetings were held here. Published Sources. (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Treasures's office and the Assessor's offace Aspen Dalily Times Articles: 5/28/89 pg, 4 col. 4 7/ 1/91 pg. 2 col. 7 6/4/ 89 pg. 4 col. 3 1/ 1/92 pg. 3 col. 9 6/17/89 pgo 4 col. 2 6/20/92 pg. 2 col. 5 6/20/89 pg. 4 col. 4 2/ 1/93 Pgâ€¢ 7 col. 1 7/25/89 pg. 4 col. 5 2/ 9/93 Pgâ€¢ 4 col. 4 8/12/89 pg. 4 col. 4 2/12/93 ng. 7 col.1-7 8/26/89 pg, 16 col. 4 7 1 11/18/89 pg. 4 col. 2 12/ 3/89 pg, 4 colo 5 3/18/90 M. 4 col. 4 3/20/90 pg. 2 col. 3 1/ 1/91 pg. 4 col. 4 Date: 5/1/74 Raina of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee I9 HISTORIC BUILDINGS OF ASPEN Survey Inventory Uarde of Building AST)en Block Original Name Aspen Block James E. Cox, H. P. Cowenhoven Present Owner Donald J. Fleisher Original Owner D. R. C. Brown Business: Mason & Business: First Nat6onal Present Use Morse, Andre's, etc. Original Use Bank. Hgo.pns_&_Co- grocers, City Drug Store, etc. Date of Construction 1886 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 89, Lots H, I, and six feet of G 303 - 309 South Galena Street Physical Description; Mall Construction This building is made from brick and trimmed with white sandstone from our native quarries along the Maroon Creek. No. of Stories Two. There is a cellar extending under the entire build- ing excepting the room on the corner. Physical Condition - Endangered Interior E x Le 1. J or - Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) Messrs. Cowenhoven and Brown, the owners and builders of the Aspen Block, began ex- cavation in the early fall of 1886. The constrpction.proceded at a rapid rate, On February 2, 1887, the First National. Bank moved.Aits roo.Ins on the corner. These rooms were embelished with hard wood and stained glass. A safe for the bank was brought to Aspen from St: Elmo. On a hill just four miles from Aspen, a wheel came off the mule drawn wagon. The safe, weighing 2,000 pounds, plunged 300 feet down the hillside and was almost lost. Hoopes & Co. Crocers and the City Drug Store rented the two store rooms fronting on Galena Street, The 24 offices upstairs were also eagerly taken. Centrally located in downtown Aspen, this handsome block remains a desirable premise Cor business. The original cost of the building was estimated at $30,000. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House recordsofrom the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's pffice Aspen Daily Times Articlest 2/ 2/93 Pg. 6 coi. 5 7/22/91 Pg. 4 Col. 1-6 12/ 5/87 pg. 4 col. 2-8 2/ 1/93 Pgâ€¢ ~ col. 1 1/ 1/90 pg, 2 col,- 1 11/13/87 Pg. 4 col 4 6, 7 2 8, 9 11/ 9/87 pg. 4 colo 3 1/13/93 pg. 6 col. 6 1/ 1/89 pg. 1 col. 1 7/ 9/87 pg. 2 col. 6 7 6, 7 8/21/88 pg. 2 col. 2, 3 1/18/87 Pg. 4 col. 2 1/ 1/93 Pg. 9 col. 5 8/19/88 pg. 4 col. 4 4/12/87 pg. 4 col. 5 6/22/92 pg. 5 col. 4 1/31/88 pg. 4 col. 4 1/ 1/87 pg. 4 col. 2, 3 1/ 3/92 pg. 1 col. 1, 2 1/11/88 pg. 1 col. 6 (photo + article)* 1/ 1/92 Pg. 2 col. 1 1/ 1/88 pg. 1 col. 1, 2 Aspen Weekly Times Articles: 11/ 7/91 ,pg. 1 col. 1, 2 2 11/ 5/91 pg. 2 col. 3 2 9/25/86 pg. 4 col. 3, 4 9/18/86 pg, 2 col. 2, 3 4 4 Date: 5/1/74 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee \9 1 #2 ASPEN BLOCK 9/18/86 Halleck Lumber & Building Co., contractors for the new brick * ! structure, let the contract for furnishing all the cut stone and line to Messrs. J. C. Rogers and Truman Case, owners of a quarry about three miles from Aspen up the Maroon. The white sandstone which was to be used for sills, porticos, arches, etc. was straight grained and of fine quality. This was the first cut stone to be used in Aspen. 1/1/87 Completed at a cost of $30,000, the Aspen Block was described as a"ragnificent structure". The corner room was originally occupied by the First National Bank. In the store rooms ort Gal.ena Street were the crocers, Messrs. Hoopes and Co. and the City Drug Store. Several noted lawyers were to occupy the offices upstairs. 11/5/91 When the First National Bank vacated its corner room in the Aspen Block, the large brokerace firm of Arkell, MacMillan and Steward rented it. Other occuponts. of the building in 1891 included Clark and Derman, grocers who had r.oved into the spice formerly rented by Hoopes Bros., and Sands Bros. clothing store. Lawyers still predominated as tenants in the 24 rooms upstairs. 12/24/91 The prominent Aspen Club opened in the building. 1/1/93 Thc Aspen Block is pictured in the Aspen Daily Times, page 9, Column 5, The picture shows the corner entrance to the brok erage firm of Arkell, Mackillan & Steward. The Aspen block is now painted a Touted gold with brown trim. The entrance on the corner to the bank and later the brokerage firm was removed in the 1930's when Mr. Herron had his filling station theree When Mason & Morse RealtorsÂ® the present occupants of this spice expanded their business they enclosed the corner. H.H. 10 liane of Building A , Arcades Original Narne Cowenhoven Building Pr@sent Owner Aspen Arcades Co, Original Owner H. P. Covenhovan_& D. R. C. Brown Present Use Ute City Bank Rest. Original Use offices of H. P. .Cowenhoven & small shops Mining Company Date of Construction 1891 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 95, North 4- of Lots A, B, C & D 501 East Hyman Physical Description: Wall Construction Massive stone blocks brought from the Frying Pan Quarries. Considerable detail was carved into the stone trim. No. of Stories 1 Physical Condition Endangered Interior Ex teri_ or Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 1/ 1/91 The building was underwaye 3/17/91 â€ž, . , the handsome new block is nearly ready , . ," 3/21/91 Covenhoven & Co. had bscome settled in their new office, During the construction of the Cowenhoven Building, the Aspen Daily Times commented that it was unfortunate that such a fine structure should be only one storv. We might pose that same question today. The form of the building remains among the most interesting in Aspen, and the stone carving is equaled only by the Wheeler Opera Houses a three story building. In the early 1900's the Midnight Mining offices were located here, and before them the offices for the Power & Light Co. Several banks have occupied the corner space. First, Bert Brown' s Aspen State Bank was there, In 1 941, when Aspen again needed- a '#8155-iA?Yed;2-3890#&:opersÂ¢+349rPitd@Â·eigp,un~3.â‚¬Rarikeial#)1961 the Bank of Aspen was located in this corner. Court House Records,from the Treasurer's office and the Assessor's office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 1/ 1/91 pg. 5 Colo 2 3/17/91 pg. 4 col. 3 3/21/91 pg. 4 col. 2 Date: 5/1/74 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee Survey inventory Aa#& 6f Building Aspen Arcades Original Name Cowenhoven Building , Present Owner Aspen Arcades Co, Original Owner Messrs. Cowenhoven & Brown Present Use Pitkin County Dry- Original Use Offices & Store goods & other small Businesses Date of Construction 1891 Locations (legal description & street address) Block 95, St of Lots A, B, C, D 308 South Galena Physical Description: :?all Construction Brick No. of Stories Two Physical Condition Endangered Interior Exterlor Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 7/21/91 Cowenhoven & Coe asked Ci.ty Council for permission to use 1- of Gale Â·na Street for storing building materials c 8/23/91 Walls and roof have been completed Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records Aspen Daily Times Articles: 7/21/91 pg. 4 col. 1 8/23/91 pg. 6 col, 1 Date: 5/1/74 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Commilttee 1I 4. . IIISTORIC BUILDINGS Or ASPEN Survey Inventory dame of Building The Red Onion Original Name The Brick S.31!101_ Present Owner Red Onion, Inc. Original Owner Tom I,at,ta Present Use Night Cltib Original Use S,aloon Date of Construction 1892 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 89, Lot 0 420 East Cooper Physical Description. Brick Uall Construction Two No. of Stories Physical Condition - Endangered Interior Exterior - Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) The Brick Saloon, now better known as Werner Klister's Red Onion, was built in the latter half of 1392 for Tom Latia, a town a].darman, who had come to Asron several years earlier from Pennsylvania, Mr. Latta chose +,ne plegant fixtures and furnishings for his new brick bvilding while in the Fast. on his weddin Er trip. The result â€¢ms heralded by the As n : iron was that the club rooms p -i Daily m. 6 of the Brick Saloon were the "handsopiest in the West". Both billiards anti pool could be played there, and it was the only place in the city where tne famous monongahela rye whiskey could be purchased, During the 1920's, Tim Kellaher and his family operated. a restaurant there, while ]6ving upstairs. lt became a saldon again after prohibition Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Assessors office and the Treasurer's office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 9/18/98 pg. 4 col. 3 2/12/93 pg. 8 col. 5 2/ 5/93 PgÂ· 2 col. 5 1/ 1/93 ps. 11 col. 2, 3 7/21/91 pg. 4 col. 1 8/ 3/91 pg. 4 col. 4 8/ 4/88 pg. 4 col. 4 7/ 8/88 pg. 4 col. 6 1/ 8/88 pg. 4 col. 4 Date: 5/6/74 Name of Researchers Aspen Historical Society Research Committee 11 Â£ '' Â° HISTORIC BUILDINGS OF ASPEN -. Survey Inventory aame of Building The Eagles Building Original Name Jones and Klng Hardware Present Owner Russell H , Volk Original Owner Charles W. D iran t Present Use Lodge, meeting place Original Use Hardware Store Date of Construction 1887 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 95, North 32' of lots K, L (Iâ€¢â‚¬) 312 South Galena Physical Description; Wall Construction Brick No. of Stories Three Physical Condition -Endangered _Interior Exterior Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) Originally known as Jones and King Hardware, it later became A. E. Jones Hardware. In January of 1892, Horrell Hardware Duchased the entire stock from A. E. Jones in what was the largest merchantile deal in the history of Ast)en. Morrell Hardware Co, opened for business on Monday, February 1, 1892, under the management of Arthur W. Morrell with $50,000 worth of stock, 9,000 square feet of floor ;Dice and two large warehouses. During its first year Morrell Hardware was to become known a s "one of the best". Before the depression, Jewitts Grocery Store maintained a respectable business here, but like niny other Aspen bildings this structure stood empty during the grim years of the depression. At-one time it was used as a stable. Then, in 1944, the Eagles began to use it as their headquarters. The original appearance has been retained Published Sources: (author, title, page, ,fate)though the steps in the front have been removed, and a narrow stone stairway on the south side is gone. Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Aspen Daily Times Articlest 2/15/90 Pg. 1 col. 8, 9 7/ 6/88 pg. 4 col. 8, 9 5/ 4/90 pg. 3 col. 3, 4 7/ 2/89 pg. 2 -col. 6, 7 9/18/90 pg. 2 col. 8, 9 11/ 2/89 pg. 1 col. 8, 9 1/ 2/91 pg. 3 col. 1, 2 12/25/88 pg. 4 col. 8, 9 1/28/92 pg. 4 col. 4 2/ 1/92 pg. 4 col. 7-9 6/17/92 pg. 8 col. 4, 5 1/ 1/93 PgÂ· 7 col. 2 3/ 3/93 %. 3 col. 6. 7 Date: May 6, 1974 Name of Researcher: Apsen Historical Society Research Committee 13 HISTORIC BUILDI ESS OF ASPEN Survey Inventory aame of Building Independence Original Name Brown & Hoag Bloph Cathering Brown & Present Owner Independence Co. Original Owner William Hoag Present Use Drugstore & Apts. Original use Offices and Rooms Date of Construction 1889 Location (legal description & street address) Block 96, Lots A, B 404 South Calena Street Physical Description- Wall Construction Brick No. of Stories Three Physical Condition - -Endangered -Interior Exterior Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 10/ 7/88 H, P. CoÂ·Â·:enhoven transfers + interest in Lots A & 3, Block 96, to William Hoag for 31,000 6/20/89 The lots, 60 x 100 feet, have been cleared Dnd excavation has begun. 11/30/69 TheÂ· building has been inclosed. Spice Toi- four larâ€ž n.- s Lore rooms was allowed for on the first floor. The second f Loor was given to offices and there were roors 46 rent on the third floor. 2/20/90 A. B. "Bert" Brown's building was ready for occupancy. The District Court moved into their new qup.rters and were soon followed by the Clerk and Recorder- and the County Commissioners. 5/ 1/90 postmaster Bradshaw opened the now Post Office in the Brown & Hoag Block. The Post Office remained j n this building i.intl.1 1926, when it was moved to Published Sources. (ailthor, title, page, date) the Webber Blocko Court House Records from the Assessor's Office and the office of the Treasurer Aspen Daily Times Articles: 10/ 7/88 pg. 3 col. 5 4/14/90 pg. 6 colo 4 5/10/89 pg. 4 col. 4 4/17/90 pg. 3 col. 8 6/20/89 pg. 4 col. 4 4/23/90 pg. 2 col. 6 7/26/89 pg. 4 cal. 5 5/16/90 pg. 4 col. 3 8/29/89 pg. 4 col. 4 5/21/90 pg. 4 col. 6 10/30/89 pg, 4 col. 3 12/ 6/91 pg. 3 col. 1-9 1/11/90 pg. 4 col. 2 1/ 3/92 pg. 3 col. 1 1/24/90 pg. 2 col. 2 1/ 5/92 pg. 3 col. 8 2/ 20/90 pg. 4 col. 4 1/12/92 pg. 1 col. 8, 9 2/25790 pg. 4 col. 4 2/16/92 pg. 3 col. 8 2/26/90 pg. 4 col. 3 1/ 1/93 PAÂ· 3 col 1, 7 4/11/90 pg. 4 col. 4 1/ 3/93 Pg. 5 col. 1, 2&7 Date: 5/1/74 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee i 14 HISTORIC BUILDINGS OF ASPEN Survey Inventory dame of Building Benedict's Original Name La Fave Block Present Owner Stein Erikson Original Owner Frank La Fave Present Use Office and Apts. Original Use Restaurant Date of Construction 1888 Location' (legal description & street address) Block 96, Lot I 405 South Hunter Physical Description. Yall Construction Brick No. of Stories Two Physical Condition -_ Endangered Interior Exterior - Remarks . (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 7/27/88 Work on the new La Fave brick block was progressing satisfaclorily 9/7/88 Fire in adjoining frame building. Mr. La Fave hal wanted to buy -Uils property and rebuild with brick too, 9/29/88 The St, James Restaurant opened and was advertised as "magnj.fi.cent... neat and clean". Through the 1920's the corner rooms were still being used as a restaurant. After the war, Fritz Benedict opened his offices there and lived iii the upst,ai rs apart- kent. Published Sources: (author; title, page, date) Court House Records from the Treasurer's office and the Assessor's office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 1/ 1/88 pg. 4 col. 3 7/ 7/88 pg. 4 col. 4 7/27/88 pg. 4 col. 6 9/ 7/88 pg. 4 col. 7 9/29/88 pg. 2 col. 7 Date: 5/7/74 lame of Researcher i Aspen Historical Society Research Committee WJ' N HISTORIC BUILDINGS Or ASPEE Survey Inventory Name of Building McDonnough's Original Name Bowman Block Present Owner Stein Erikson Original Owner John Bowman Present Use Sports Shop an.d Original Use Saloon Apartments Date of Construction 1893 Location: (legal description & street address) Block 96, Lots G, H Physical Description: r7 .all Construction Brick lio. of Stories Two Physical Condition _ -Endangered Interior Exte.Lior - Remarks. (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 2/19/93 With the new saloon bujlding nearly complete, John Bowiran expected to be open for business the following week, 2/26/93 An Aspen Daily Times article reported th=.t John Bowman had moved j nto his new sal.oon the urevious dav. Mr. Bowman not only ran a popular saloon, but he also maintained a museum here to display his collection of western arti fac+s which included mineral sari:D].es end a gun used by Wild Bill Hi tchcock. Mr. Bowman and his famil.yÂ· ck Â©i.nued. 1.0 work in this buildirg while living in the apartme,its 11-pstairs thiÂ·ouch the 19204Â·. r I - . -4- After the Second World War, Herbert Bayei had his artist's st.udio on le . a 1 0 L floor, while he and his Â·family ].ived in the upstairs apart.merit.s. Today the building has a fresh coat of grey paint- but otherwise remains unchanged in Published Sources. (author, title, page, date) appearane e. Court House records from the Assessor' s office and the Treasurees office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 2/19/93 pa. 5 col. 5 2/26/93 Pg. 1 col. 4 Date: May 1, 1974 Name of Researchers Aspen Historical Society Research Conmi.-ltee 4/ IiISTORIC BUILDINGS OF ..~_- EU Survey Inventory Name of Building Aspen City H,11 Original Name Armnry HA 1 1 Present Owner City of Aspen Original Owner Aqpen Armnry Hall Co. Present Use Government Offices Original Use Mi lit.ary arilling_& storage, Social events, balls, recep- Date of Construction 1891 tions, concerts, etc. Location: (legal description & street address) Block 93, Lots K, L, M 130 South Galena Street Physical Description, Wall Construction Brick No. of Stories Three Physical Condition Endangered Interior Exterlor - ~~1-4 Remarks: (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 10/ 2/91 After consideration of several possible sites, the Aspen Armory Hall Co. purchased two lots on the S. E. corner of Calena Street and Hopkins Avenue from J. D. Hooper for $5,000. 10/17/91 Excavation was begun. The plans for the new Arnory Hall specified a t.zIP. story structure made of brick. The ground floor was to be used for Armory purposes only, but the second f loor which could be reached from the outsi.dq, was to be open for lodge purposes End. to have a room for bar.quets 1/21/92 Company C of the first batta].ion held the inaugeral ball. to dedi ca te the Armory which had been completed at a cost of $15,000. A new danc5 ng acadamy had already opened in the building and it was evident that the Armory was destined to be a center of social activity in Aspen for years to come. Published Sources: (author, title, page, date) Court House Records from the Assessor's office and the Treasurer's office Aspen Daily Times Articles: 8/23/91 pg, 6 col. 1 6/23/92 pg. 6 col. 2 10/2/ 91 pg. 4 col. 2 6/17/92 pg. 5 col. 5, 6 1 / 2/92 pg. 2 col. 6 419/92 pg. 7 col. 5 1/10/92 pg. 2 col 5 1/14/93 pg. 5 1/14/92 pg. 4 col. 4 1/15/93 pg. 8 col. 5 1/21/92 pg. 4 col. 2 2/19/93 Pgâ€¢ 8 col. 5 1/25/92 pg. 4 col. 3 2/ 7/93 Pgâ€¢ 7 col. 1 1/30/92 pg. 4 col. 5 2/1 /92 pg. 4 col. 6 2/ 7/92 pg. 2 col. 5 2/21/92 pg. 3 col. 3 4/13/92 - pg. 4 col. 3 5/17/92 pg. 6 col. 3 Date: May 1, 1974 Name of Researcher: Aspen Historical Society Research Committee Id,3-1 4-01,L fo '- iÂ·'n.1_,4 UlÂ·412 t~-*c_,21-UL-eau<q LA, -l,La\'vi.â‚¬7 '>-f-k_EL&-1.423 Y\, UU_~l-,1,2 ~74' -n,20.- Of- - LUt--; Lt,-2-/1Â«, 1/~,gr'Â·~~~~ 7 C.- - EL, 4/9- I --4Â«24 =ta- c.-1-4.-.aÂ»e'll' LI'.Eirrim.l.,AL l-- 3-01Â»- - Â«t 0 4-1 lo--aju-- et tt--1 ~aL---~ _ 4.. n.2 Cd-,v-*.- 9191- t--a-/:.rs e'.'//.1 1- n Â· A n P Â· 2.14 <1 . al 906/h -ArLL- CU.â€ž-4-Â«)--k _l_40-_-~>..L r 1 J./Judba- -4-7*1-- 19/4600(YlÂ»U~-pÂ» CLEQ-Coi~e <44 i A W - 27 1((-TILL.2- _fR Epit<112. ar -pil-i---1.-I __-772 3-za ~_Â« 1 2 LA 70 e /0'=12 .\ TO: Aspen Planning Commission FROM: Herb Bartel DATE: January 14, 1972 SUBJECT: (~li~~oric Zoni-ri~Rewrite Section G (beginning on page 8) has been rewritten to improve provision for building permit review. I spoke with..Alby about combining all public hearings, and I will explain at the meeting why the regulation has been left as it was. 1Â¢991 m .1 ...: Final Draft 1/3/72 ORDINANCE NO. (Series of 1972) AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE AND PRE- SERVATION OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES, COMBINATIONS OF STRUCTURES, SITES AND AREAS WHEN DESIGNATED FOR PRESERVATION AS AN H, HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND THE CONTINUED CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURES AND COMBINATIONS OF STRUCTURES COMPLEMENTARY TO THOSE OF HISTORIC VALUE WITH AN H, HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT; MAKING PROVISION FOR THE CREATION OF AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION; CREATING A PROCEDURE FOR THE DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES, COMBINATIONS OF STRUCTURES, SITES AND AREAS AS H, HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL, CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF ALL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WITHIN AN H, HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT AS THEY PERTAIN TO SEC- TION 17, CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 11. Section 1: Subsection (a), Section 5, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled R-40 Residential; Subsection (b) Section 5, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled R-30 Residential; Subsection (c), Section 5, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled R-15 Residential; Subsection (C), Section 11, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled R-PUD -- Residential; Subsection (D), }52-dfab-TE-~~~, Ellin-,te:141,&2211-18111 'i-----:......-i ..4 ffill.lij@FEIGiliN-Di-4228*2 44-411; Subsection (e), Section 5, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled R-6 Residential; Subsection (f), Section 5, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled R-MF Residential; Subsection (a), Section 6, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled AR-1 Accommodations Recreation; Subsection (b), Section 6, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled AR-2 Accommodations Recreation; Subsection (2), Section 7, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled C-1 Commercial; Subsection (b), -2- Section 7, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled C-C Commercial; Sub-Â· section (c), Section 7, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled C-2 Commercial; Subsection (a), Section 8, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled P Park; and Subsection (b), Section 8, Chapter 1 of Title 11 entitled AF Agricultural Forestry are hereby amended by adding the following standards and regulations for the H, Historic Overlay District to each of the above mentioned zone districts. Section 2: Chapter 1 of Title 11 is hereby amended by adding Section 17 entitled H, Historic Overlay District. 11-1-17: H, HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT A. Intention To promote the educational, cultural, economic and general welfare of the public by preserving those qualities that relate to the history of the City of Aspen, the State of Colorado and the Nation, it is - deemed essential to provide for the preservation and continued existence of historic structures, combina- tions of structures, sites and areas within the City and for the construction, reconstruction and remodeling of structures and combinations of structures, within legally designated H, Historic Overlay Districts, complementary to those in existence within said H, Historic Overlay Districts. B. Applicability The H, Historic Overlay District shall be applied according .. to the provisions of this Section and shall have the effect of superimposing the requirements of this Section upon the structure, combination of structures, site or areas so designated in addition to the requirements of the zone 1 district in existence at the time of H, Historic Over- lay District designation. C. Creation of the Historic Preservation Commission There shall be established an Historic Preservation Com- mission with 5 members appointed by the City Council, with such powers and duties as are hereinafter pre- scribed which include in part: (1) to make recommen- dations to the Planning Commission and City Council on the designation of H, Historic Overlay Districts and to provide support material necessary to justify such desig- nation; and (2) to review and render decisions on indivi- dual building permit applications within H, Historic Over- lay Districts. D. Standards for Designation of H, Historic Overlay Districts. Structures, combinations of structures, sites or areas to be included within an H, Historic Overlay District shall be evaluated and considered based on the following guidelines and standards. 1. Historical Importance The structure, combination of structures, site or area (a) has character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City of Aspen, the State of Colorado or the Nation; or (b) is the site of an historic event with an effect upon society; or (c) is identified with a person or group of persons who had some influence on society; or (d) exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social or historical heritage of the community; or (e) by its preservation, promotes the health, safety, prosperity or welfare of tbe present and future i.nhabi- tants of the community. -4- 2. Architectural Importance The structure or combination of structures (a) por- trays the environment of a group of people in an area of history characterized by a distinctive architec- tural style; or (b) embodies the distinguishing char- acteristics of a significant or unique architectural type specimen; or (c) is the wotk of an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen; or (d) contains elements of design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural style. 3. Geographic Importance The structure, combination of structures, site or area (a) because of being part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area, should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on an historic, cultural or architectural motif; or (b) due to its unique location or singular physical characteristics, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the City. E. Procedure for Designation of H, Historic Overlay Districts 1. Initiation of Procedure Whenever in the opinion of the Historic Preservation Commission a structure, combination of structures, site or area meets the standards for designation of H, Historic Overlay Districts, as set forth in Sub- section D., Section 17, Chapter 1 of Title 11 hereof, Â·Â·Â· the,Historic Preservation Commission shall contact .the owner or owners of such structure, combination of st-ruc- tures, site or area, outlining the reasons for and -5- effects of designation as an H, Historic Overlay Di_s- trict, and, if possible, shall secure the owner's written consent to such designation. Following this contact the Historic Preservation Commission may pro- ceed by officially adopting a resolution: (a) stating that a preliminary investigation and review indicates that the described structure, combination of structures, site or area is eligible for designation as an H, His- torie Overlay District; (b) stating either that the Historic Preservation Commission is in receipt of the owner's written consent to such designation or why the Historic Preservation Commission feels that it should proceed without such consent; (c) requesting that a joint public hearing with the Historic Preservation Com- mission and the Planning and Zoning Commission be sche- duled on the question of designation at a specific time, date and place. 2. Joint Hearing - Historic Preservation Commission and Planning and Zoning Commission Upon receipt of a request from the Historic Preser- vation Commission for a joint public hearing to desig- nate a structure, combination of structures, site or area as an H, Historic Overlay District the Planning and Zoning Commission shall set the time, date and place for said joint public hearing and shall adver- tise said hearing as outlined in Section 13, Chapter 1 of Title 11 of the Zoning Code of the City of Aspen. During the joint public hearing the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consi-der the designation proposal with respect to: (a) its relationshi.p to the Aspen Area General Plan; (b) the effect of designation upon the -6- surrounding nei.ghborhood; and (c) such other planning considerations as may be relevant to the proposed de- , I signation. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall - IM% recommend approval, modification or disapproval and the reasons therefor, and shall submit said recommen- dation to the City Council within 30 days after the joint public hearing date. Failure on the part of the Planning and Zoning Commission to submit a recommen- dation within the specified period shall indicate ap- proval of the proposed designation. During the joi_nt public hearing the Historic Preserva- tion Commission shall consider the designation proposal with respect to the standards and criteria outlined for said designation within Section 17, Chapter 1 of Title 11 of the Zoning Code of the City of Aspen. The Historic Preservation Commission shall recommend approval, modification or disapproval and the reasons therefor and shall submit said recommendations to the City Council within 30 days after the joint public hearing date. . During the joint public hearing the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall adopt a resolution requesting that the City Council set the time, date and place for a public hearing on the proposed designation before the City Council. 3. City Council Designation Hearing The City Council shall set a public hearing within 15 days after receipt of the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation on the proposal to designate a struc- ture, combination of structures, site or area as an H, Historic Overlay District. The City Council public -7- hearing shall be in accordance with the provisions as outlined in Section 13, Chapter 1 of Title 11 of the Zoning Code of the City of Aspen. H, Historic Over- lay Districts so designated by the City Council will be classified for zoning purposes by the existing zone district designation at the time of adoption of this Section plus the suffix H. 4. Recordation of H, Historic Overlay District Designation Within 15 days of the effective date of an amendment designating structures, combinations of structures, sites or areas as H, Historic Overlay Districts, the Commission shall notify the City Building Inspector of the official designation and the City Clerk shall record among the real estate records of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, either (a) a cer- tified copy of the amendment designating specified property within an H, Historic Overlay District as a structure, combination of structures, site or area for preservation; or (b) a notice stating that specified property has been placed within an H, Historic Overlay District, and designated as a structure, combination of structures, site or area for preservation, and citing the amendment and the effective date thereof which made the designation effective. The notice also may contain a brief summary of the effects of such desig C==) nation, as set forth in this Section. In addition, the Zoning District Map of the City of Aspen shall be amended to indicate specified property within an II, Historic Overlay District as a structure, combination -8- of structures, site or area for preservation by the addition of the suffix H to the property so designated by the appropriate amendment. Failure to record such amendment or. notice within the required time shall suspend the effective date of the designation until the recording has been made. F. Procedure to Amend or Rescind Designation of H, Historic Overlay Districts A structure, combination of structures, site or area desig- nated as an H, IIistoric Overlay District may be amended or rescinded in the same manner as the original designation was made. G. Procedure to Authorize Erection, Removal, Construction, Reconstruction, Remodeling or Demolition of Structures, Combination of Structures, Sites or Areas Designated as H, Historic Overlay Districts for Preservation. 1. Building Permits shall not be issued for any of the following acts unless a determination has been made by the Building Inspector that no change to the exterior appearance of structures or combination of structures will result or until the appropriate action has been taken by the Historic Preservation Commission based on the pre application review and application review provisions of this Section. a) Remodeling, reconstruction of, or addition to, the exterior architectural feature of any improve- ment which constitutes all or part of a structure or combination of structures, within an H, His- torie Overlay District; b) Demolition or moving of any improvement which constitutes all or part of a structure or I I./ I ' '' '..b ./I ' I-''~Il -9- combination of structures within an 11, His- torie Overlay District; c) Construction or erection of any improvement or addition to any improvement upon any land included within an H, Historic Overlay District. 2. Pre Application Review Prior to the preparation of working drawings and specifications or calling for proposals or bids from contractors, prospective property developers, owners or agents shall prepare preliminary seale drawings and outline specifications for review and informal discussion. Said preliminary scale drawings and specifications together with such other information as may be required to enable an intelligent understanding of the proposed work and a written request for the pre application review shall be submitted to the Building Inspector. All documents submitted to the Building Inspector for these required reviews shall be in triplicate pre- Dared in a form suitable for filing in a standard size office filing cabinet. No exhibits need be submitted with request to move or demolish. Should the Building Inspector determine that preliminary scale drawings and outline specifications demon- strate that no change to the exterior appearance of structures or combination of structures will result, the Building Inspector may exempt the . the applicant from a pre application review with the Historic Preservation. Commission. In cases where exterior changes result, the Building Inspector --I.I#.Ill-. +I.- - 10 - shall notify the Commission promptly of each r pre application and shall set a meeting date for said pre application review. In cases of very minor repair projects the Historic Pre- servation Commission, if preliminary drawings - and other data are sufficiently clear and expli- cit., may grant approval at this pre application stage and shall so advise the Building Inspector in writing. The Building Inspector shall continue to process the building permit in accordance with appropriate regulations. 3. Application Review In cases where approval is not given at the pre application stage the following procedure shall apply. In processing each application for a building permit under the provisions of this - Section, the Historic Preservation Commission shall hold at least one (1) public hearing, notice of the time and place of which shall be given at least fifteen (15) days in advance by publication in a newspaper having general circulation in the City of Aspen. If the exhibits under pre application review are deemed inadequate for holding a public hearing and for forming a clear idea of the proposed work, the Commission shall postpone action until adequate exhibits have been submitted. After such public hearing, the Commission shall: (a) approve or approve with conditions, the building permit as it pertains to the provisions of this Section, and -, /11.-C . ..,LL:C.-~1~1=.d= . 2 -Â·>~-- I. - 11 - shall so advise the Building Inspector in writing, and said Building Inspector shall then continue to process the application in accordance with appropri- ate regulations; or (b) disapprove the building permit applied for as it pertains to this Section, and so advise the Building Inspector and the City Council in writing stating the reasons for such disapproval, and the Building Inspector shall deny the building permit. The applicant shall be notified of the Commission's decision within 10 days of the public hearing at which the application was considered. Recommendations of approval, disapproval or conditional approval shall be noted on the face of the application and signed by the Chairman of the Commission. No permit for work within an H, Historic Overlay District may be issued without the approval or conditional approval of the Historic Preservation Commission endorsed thereon except in cases exempted by the Building Inspector or granted by the Historic Pre- servation Commission in the pre application stage or except after appeal as provided below. H. Criteria for Approval, Conditional Approval or Excep- tion - Historic Preservation Commission 1. Approval The Commission shall judge any proposed remodeling for the preservation of historical, architectural and characteristic qualities, and any new structure for complementary design with adjacent designated Â·structures, combinations of structures, sites or A - 12 - areas. In case of an application to raze or move a structure, judgemenl shall be malle on the basis of its historical and architectural importance, its importance as a part of the geographic areas within which it is located, and the actual physical condi- tion of the structure. 2. Conditional Approval The Commission may grant conditional approval at pre application review or application review stages on the provision that changes related to exterior architectural features recommended by it be made in the proposed work. In such case, the Building Inspector shall determine that the conditions of approval have been met and shall continue to process the building permit in accordance with appropriate regulations. 3. Exceptions The Commission may recommend exceptions or waivers from the provisions of this Section, provided such exceptions do not damage the character of the Dis- trict or the intent of this Section, and are required to prevent an injury to the public welfare. The recommendation for exception, after approval by the Commission, shall be - 13 - forwarded to the City Planning Commission for review and recommendation and then submitted to the City Council and if approved by it, the Building Inspector may issue a permit therefore if said application is in accordance with additional appropriate regulations not covered in this Section. I. Appeal Procedure Appeals from any decision or determination made by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Aspen must be taken to the appropriate court wichinÂ·60 days after the date of such a decision. J. Role of Board of Adjustment The Board of Adjustment shall not act on any variance or exception pertaining to property within an H, Historic Overlay Di_strict without first consulting and obtaining the written report of the Historic Preservation Commission. No appeal shall lie to the Board of Adjustment from any of the decisions of the Historic Preservation Commission. K. Remedying Dangerous Conditions In any case where the Building Inspector, Health Officer, Fire Department or any other duly authorized officer or agency of the City of Aspen. shall order or direct the con- struction, reconstruction, remodeling, repair or demolition of any improvement or any other necessary action to a struc- ture, combination of structures, site or area designated as an H, Historic Overlay District, for the purpose of remedying conditions determined by said agencies to be immediately dangerous to life, health, or property, nothing contained 14 herein shall be construed as making it a violation of this Section for any person to comply with such order or directive without receipt of a statement from the Commission. Any such department, agency or officer shall give the Commission as early notice as practicable of the proposed or actual issuance of any such order or directive. L. Violation and Remedies Wherever, by the provisions of this Section, the per- formance of any act is required or the commission of any act is prohibited, a failure to comply shall consti- tute a violation of Chapter 1 of Title 11 and subject to the provisions of Section 11-1-16. M. Definitions 1. Remodeling Any act or process which changes one or more of the exterior architectural features of a structure, com- bination of structures, site or area designated as an H, Historic Overlay District. 2. H, Historic Overlay District Any structure or improvement and its surrounding envi- rons, a group or combination of structures or improve- ments and their surrounding environs, sites or areas and their surrounding environs designated for preser- vation as an H, Historic Overlay District under the provisions of this Section. 3. Exterior Architectural Feature The architectural style, design, general arrangement, and components of all the outer surfaces of a structure - 15 - or improvement, including but not limited to the texture and materials, and to the type and style of all windows, lights, signs and other ,fixtures appurtenant to said structure or improvement. 4. Improvement Any building, structure, place, work of art or other object constituting a physical betterment of real property or any part of such betterment. d . - -- L--. C)-.- -+56-- -)-47-5 =*16//+.- \444% ___-se:d> N )./*,kL- - _1/.I-i~ Â£. 1. . 1 -.....'.-I...Z- Â».I , 0, ' 1 /-1 11-1 k 43- Ul-LITJ 14 [- fl! 1 ELI #.1 , i +. E 2 1 4- 3 utti-0 37--4. [91719--A [1 iff.--11 21111 ;Al ~-34'il-L.FLEÂ«j U O Le.) . ~ L \ rl . .R kl 1 LL lAi,~ "" ANÂ« - 1 '1 A..... 0. I. . j ...Â£1 . 49 . III 11 11 d'} Â©-4413[03~~Â·~[Â·1'~liINJ,Â®Ed~ill.,3@ :4~ L 1,11Â·~1'- 1 4, \\ l \ - BIAT 40 4 1 I Ll-Â·L-L~*- ' An & : ~*1 1 1. 1 couNÂ¥3_====-7 2'IT *119 COUNM 1 " 11~1 1/11 L.Ell/ - . 1 Li..11.1 r l/r 2 / 12 '#er /<72 4/ .1.. e,/ 11 '. 4 r 71 '4 v .61Â· \.1 ..Ek\ -- - 00 /7 - .1 i - 3 1 9 6 7: MA/0 0- A 9 713&&Stpr,J,V 4., L i'1 = .+B<r T~ILLI T 4. 1 !1'll il Â¥ 4--( .C. . . 1 lili! & 1,1,1, I k. , 11 Â¢ .11 1 . ', 1,11 /' '-\ 0 Â£16â€žEn *;F ' . '. 1 '11 11 7 4 1 r] 7* c \4/- Tr f\\,0 , C | SCO.. CIVIL â‚¬ N OIN It . . 1 e, , 4 1 14 11 /9 . .\ 1 ' _Lili k 0. -- k 11, r- , COLO. K , 4 , /, , 1 k.1 11 *, .11. 91 .1. i '. - 6 0 rif t '' ' f'I f ~ 1 1 -~ r 1 i' . -, \ ..16.-/.1. ..1 4 t 0 t.tr, ieee Â£ At,y V H...7 4 .... .-I-/. 0- , 'W 1 .4 -f Â£ 1 e ' . 3 . CALILI - , 1 _ 4 0 6Â·.1 , I --2,1.U 1 A v E ., .-.. ..0 \ / 0 -t - *C-,â€¢LI. 1,1 - 77..1, I''Ill ,Â¥wu'13 ; Â£.t,4 44 .t . ,/ C<A I . 5 1 f. r h ,+ -Ult I frfl' .'.1 [ 11'-4:_ij . D.v 4-1 J .LA'*'Fl.1: Â· b.~ ':4 4 '''i Â·19'.1 XE'-Â· C i Â«Pg --9.0, . .. 7 '. 85 --1-T-'-1 Xb . /11 . . C. .Â· 1 1*- 12 I. / NOT. . ti, Fr//1#â€¢// 81/A, a'* tii Lâ€¢4 4/ft... .I.... ..'4 /6 , '124 41 1 9. 0 4 - r-- I 91*1 1 gr--- ., "W[ 1 4 1-7 3 f .Ic .... . ...LE ./ 1 A-4.- - - -- - Ili ' 91 7 'Peror, 0/ 45,5/ 4,1.4.47, FLâ€ž TAâ€¢ ghâ€¢, Lâ€¢trâ€¢'â€¢ */14#, A'ki Dia- 9'LA b, C. -- A... .1 1 0 , <tt ' -4 1 .4 .7.0..,4,7- 0/LLC 5. 4 1 A V ' _1 . to /'r-T 1 4'.atâ‚¬ . ..9 . Â£ . 1 0,Â£,g ~ 3~/1 - /6 / 0 - / 0 L - --~ r 6 11- - h.~ j, .4 C ' v 4 , / 1 , h ' - u , .:Pt:l.5 4 1.413(- 1- ' 1 *t . 4 _'~ - 4 - 1. 5 , l :* 193*L.2/Â·" f â€¢t; ~ 'C/,2,â€ž0~" V , t. - . l K , i 4 0 / . 1.. 11 . 't. , _ , 2)- ~, , , 1 9 -q#* / .- 0 . - P -- .$. . P 14 & h -VJ j ..it '-P .1 1. 3 2 . 1 9 ~. 1 ~~AL L /LM C. t g Â·Â·- - I U 11 . | FZ , 44".8 F a' 1 'U i tal ' Y 1,4 r> 0 4 944 Â·Â·AL:*dit-8 LE': :.l., - i T.1 "(~,Â°Al~i %42-~~f :.:3~:ti -g 041- Â»,â€¢ 171 ~ w, Â·T,1. :11 ..' il :1- 5 4 Nwp $ ~-u -~ , 1 -41:A~~; thi*Â»-~ M : :t LI=-- xi+3 1 .- L *. 46-. > ~-13- -* 2 ~.-6.0, 4 ./i ./. 6 -- , .,c crr,1044 N .4 4 / . 9 0 1 ~ U. 7- VAT' 1 , . U.7 -. - . 4 . 4 3-1 1 8 , 0 4 .t - + 0 0 FÂ· A...CIAT,O ,; L Â¢ 8 ./ f --4 1 .A SMiliklJtzi * NE,40 ....1 t'*-7:... 0 . 4 1\ Ept- t. I. , . / -<L . "f . 0. 0 L i.'- 1 4 . 6. 1 00.-Pr . 4. .0-*I .- '-6/16..4,/ 1441.'. ..J XES , 1.0. 2/t â‚¬ 0 - I ..O .'.1 E.:0/:1 4 li.5/16.1,14 . , 0 I - I - . . 1 O 'c , 0 , 4 /1/ - / /* - . 1 1'.... -44< #. r i , '' , 0 - - 2* 6,0 '41/. D . . ; 0 , 'FL Â· - L , I h , 1 M. 1 A . 9 r ---Ct -19 1 *I / ' e . 4 . -0 1 /#7.. I - e ULÂ· , Â·4-1 //- B shâ€¢~/ \4 i. , 1. i /. L,1 A 10 " a 7. 4 -JA, 4 1. Hal- ,/irt;\\/1 . 9,/.. 4 1/i* 1 , ... . 4 .0, 0 4 Â£ $'\1 . // ' / 4 *4 - P I . O--4 .' X 1 : .0.-t A . I. Â· + 1 0 - 1 ..Lf ..1 t 1% ----*I- L / C - 1. - . 6 :72 1. * -* - , r< - . 1, A ' .., . 0 , . , ., 9 I - Â¢ i I . 0 % .. 1 04 4 I j. P'7-h_ ~~ ' ~ 9 4 . Th. ./ Jl . ~ li~k' 't~~ ~~~-)~~---t;L~~ --T UNN E L e 1 X L , 1 1 Â»A 1, -/. r..... ~ 0,1.I, j. 1 IT7I. 17 i 1,14~0'Â·f I .a - - a 4 .. , 6 r -r Ii-1 1Â£ *0#Â£1_*l ~i, bi- -Laiw: I "*14 V24 k.4~4 / '~ < 2- - L.Â·â€¢~ Â© ~41,6 ~p ,Â¢'N.,,770MIMMP';C~1.RW<Ve'"-50 --- ' .8 / r-4(22>bl.~~5"=Lf/13 4 - ~. k '449 . 1 ,%/ . 4 h /---r, :>f" . . i Â·112 2 + 4Â»2*.., ...., f. r , $ 1 2 .,- - Â»1 1 -1 e . 1- 1, 1 2*..iiI j, 4 . I ... *0 7 3 111 10 + : 4 / 0 -R. I . 1 1 5: 4 )1 - . I. .e C. 'f .d \ .PAES.T.,4. . 14 ' 40 A 0 1--- . U. .. L.... I I . erÂ· 3 ' b -7 I .1 I + 1 0. 1 0 Â£ a C D â€¢ V ' 4 * - 4 4.. r + 24 1 , 1 0 K 9 9 /0 , 0 f , . -A.,0.- -0. \ 1 . i 4,1 / .*//- - f I ./, 4 7 0 3- 'â€¢ A + 4,444.1 Â· . 0'. / ' /9, 10 0 ..1 1 . 8{ ~8 0 8 .e , 1 Cd..74. r Â»- A .71 U t. -I - 4 - ' 1L - 1, ' Itt -iff ~. 4 0 Â¥ ./A ' . 4- - . . 1 -/ \ 0, â€¢ 4 . el W... -.P 4 1 14 ..., -5444 - 99*4261 ~ 1 715< 6 / 1 n b .... c .4 . 1' 2 ~ ...... C Â¥ -1 , 6 5 43 1 0 4. 1 . UL-IJJ.,~71 , 1 0 r. 4 , 4 % .1 -./ a UU . , -Â»pi , -, 77* , . 1 - " 44 2 .1-- 0 - Mâ€¢-11 }/ , 1 , 0 ~i~. y / i.17-1- 4 / I ./ 4 9 - : ... . 4 - Z e 4 0 , 0- 4 1. ... ,. - . 1 EU,R={WIâ€ž * . . I. O -- .,17 .2. / :.=423*7 . -I'll. . ... C. - /1--4104 A.,U,1 -~0 Râ€¢64, .1. W. -Â·_174 ,~f/~41 4 4 Â· CM.* .:di 6. hal j G 4 i *4 Lks,HEES#r-24,3 1 : . Â· 144:20/%., 9/: -- . g. . ; 04 2 4 u . 'v"1/MU - 72~ R> -7f..U &1 1,11.12 1 #- e f J - 8-Ve E CONCE -r -c ' ~â€¢ ' f "â€¢ ~e< - 23Â»t,W e 1. 2 Â·2Â« 2 ./ - *.. - 0 lififilvjaaM,I iiI . . i 7 ' k I . 5 'g , - O 4 r â€¢ ..4.2-* 064% 0 â€¢ **, L.-1 ... I , P g 7 , I -I 7 L i.,0 . 1 1.. I \ t -0/0--4- --4 . . 9 4 -I-- -4 1 '- -- t Â¢ '4 ,... 1 8-111 - - .. i. â„¢r--- ---1...'-i 4 4 4.-1 - Il - ,/,< F A2/71â€¢~.17 - -- ,- ... ,-~'*0~90,<; ~~ ~F ~~~ --- - ~-- 4. - I r-- I r , 4 J I .1- . 0 -, . ~'/'"~' 1 ;r '1 \, , . ./. f 0 =/ . - .... 0 I . V . . 4 , 40 K ~ -- . ' - 1 4 / f 010 7 Lli--1 1 co 0 4. a 211% *10 4 I.- -I ' , *44ifil ~-â€¢ 1 . P e . \St , , h b.+ I . . . 6 ./ ron , 0 1 ' 0 0 te 4' J S..1/Bâ€¢ Eâ€¢ PER, NIA '3 4 - . , 011Â«4.4,4. 1 A . . 1 , 00 4 09+ 34 / 4 . . .0 0 , L 4 1 . I * 00 f < A. / #, 0 . 3 , 0uif y. - f -.--...4./7 . 1/- ' 06 3 0 -4 , \v<+ 4 1 17 0 . ' 31* ..841 *152t'ZI , , â€¢ 4/ 1 - U - ' ri, - / Â©1 p , . '1 - e. . e i . 4 1 l- 11 2%,1.- 1 r-Gith. - 7 44%~ . v ' , V 041 9 0 2-râ€¢L- - 1 0 - >07 + 0 4 4.0 i h Â·t . -- ..4 - 9 4- . r J 27 6-7. 441.79 7 . I U) h \ /. -cr-~ "11 1-J<,11?i~E ' A *U&& i *r - -f 41-- j: - 4, /VE,LL LUS,-2. i - -. t/,- ./ J .1 I 1 " W F.Wif f h i "C-h.Â»k , U v Oâ€¢9\ I 1 *. t 4 $0 h. 4 t 1- / - % 6 iwor-% fiej*/ P */6$/4 2.Â·t.., rti,Le 7 i k r + i#*SE:,9/.69 6-Â«--27 0.102./,2917291=Act/,4- 77Rr-+33'~ '1 t - IDLP-lz=r . IR,E~ P@ C . f (y t,l.,0 4 t. 6 f l., M i ~Â»T r -j /01./'9$* L..l 0 . 79.-Ami,4.I. 4. 9/,. 7,7 - 2 4~ a I.(2 , 4 1 1 4/\ 1 0, , 0 0 a P, Â¢ 0 \ )..Tio.'69 13 4 / A i .' 4 / 0 Â¢ ...1 MASCO/TE 'V. .Â» 0 2 . 46/0 ~ :â€¢bl-, .. fil,1, i. .2- - 4074 *3,4< 22-29. ~ . / et'g.WI /*EA/' U f \ e ' I. 1 1, 24 , 9 0 4 4. 0 ---4333-~L~ 3 9.lift~Wt,1 f .91H2.-k --â€ž9 *amÂ©Mil * 1-=, 4..I ~YL"4-' 2. Â«4 .. 4, 0 F. 6,"' 6 ~+ i ~j \ - / r~~ '4, I . Â¥ t - \ / . / . 3. 0 \ 1- -' 4 - f. 1 37Â»f ~ i 20, .,0.-7 . -~- /4 f - / 4 f *~,C-ts,E-1-14ilifi~/2 tr *. /15;'Mâ€ž.1, ----7'I,<91,1 - -. 4/6 <-14,1 4., 01*2~850â€¢z ,< . , ..10 ..t,/ L.ir:49.7,1./.,t ~~ < 1 r '0 9 'r,11. I~ 4 * J . ~ ff/'/47-Jib 1-~lm"~/ h.-, 4 0, 2 N 2Â»41/ 4 +L,Fy. 4 /--l.-\ . t - . . 1 9.. . , , e' 8/ -,2 6 '*1... . d."I.-- 7-'.2.'ll"Mull, Â£99/1/56; . 5.Un .,A- 4 :160 1 ~ 2 - Â¥1 2/ /15 6/4 R e ,#- 4. /73* I " 1471. /, f # i /4/ 0 ' .' T . W 8,7-~ 0 ...ENT ./ ~1B 4 LUZz--1~' drillÂ£l y ' cla-H.'.\ r 10 4/f / 0 0 I . Mo-/.INS 0 -2 --m. F A / .7-23.-9,4.~t--//~~~/~/// P.lierr.,4/7..1/Il I 6 1 8--1.-46 i \2 J.I,L' Â»1 / 9 1 - 1417 mu I r --hk r 2 / W 1 1 ~j''t i +4 -4 . 1 *9,3 1 fpt,/9 i .... , - 44 4 t..L / h 1 /' tÂ¢ , 6Â¥ F J . 34 1,1 .I-7 -/IN>-1 91/1/Il Â©0 U. 4, .. 1 I.pic 4499 f . -hi - .7.-4.n .4 P ./ 1 /11 4 7 -- . -4.1 r - .e-,1.1 'It <I- F 1. 4 ~ 7-4 4 IC , ..J#I. 1 - imis/, I V Â·4, 2*Gtial . ..tp-237 r . -- . U 1.- r -7 ./.ff.let .tm.LL:~' o/*ik. 1*6 .L / 4 1 1, 1. ID. 1 7 ''T - Al * 6, .W/-6 - - "~ 4 4 .1 - 1.J o 0 - -,4.41-4,1/AftÂ· Â· M, li / 2 . I h , , , i Â·Â·4~~ F /,31# [ f -7-, 7 i - , , -J . Â¥ 4 3 1 / ~ 2 /. 4.-,7.L -- ,/, . 3 + C . â€¢-~Pt *22 4. 1 , ....liria-0 / Q , UÂ«r- i z '9 V / .4--f . .9 r . . ). . . d -=>El r - . 1- 6 .- <6Â«3 264"*der i -.5 '10.1,2,2 -Â¥ - 42" -- 7, a L.21 I -4 19 / ,- :9:*FilwQ S i ->i 4 t-4 2 , P 7 2 -ry 4 U _ A Â·/ 0 7 ., A 0\ 1 ' . 14, Â»4 I /VIA 4 1 00 f ' . A. - , -r S . - / F\.-2 i ille/Milli' :i:fEEF3'.Ii..440' <iA~'f:Iriv' 26*Jif~Lu . #4'-* 0 ' 5 Frr- i 4 kut /1 , // .r.,4 11 -1 ' - ' V X 2 1\ ' , u 5 4 9.1 2 Y 4 4, Â· , r e ~ -1 ir 7/34 3 1 2 / . 4 1 , , 4,71 ./4 1 o t \ 4/ 61 , .. -242.-# r - .. T h Â· I'*/ M f p **9 04.6.â€ž. A- E Mt,4 . /.1 .2 */4, 2:Zal. '. t. e f li 9 4 ~* , . 1/ .l v , 69 5 + ~ h ' 4, jn -- IZE L- 4 4 --4 \ . 9 4 16 7--,f...1 94 0 I . , 7 4 . c 1 - 19 941#-, , M 4 *.-r- f 0 / I , , 4 4 , 1 1 - 0 , 1 3/.,t 0 . f 01 4 - /2 + ,.,Â·Â·f>>~Â·6~~lnâ‚¬.' 4 re-. Â· rs- -4 32 - 1 199 I. r d . 1/,44*, f 44.f V 1 -1 4 .Vt- - J .* r 6 , -- 4 a 4 v .-L *~//0* / A*0401 p,8544 0 , . 4, v-/1.Â¥ / i 0 -0 . . â€¢ct - . 0 / D. , 3 I It / 6 0 4 4 -0 - .. 1 A 45 , . \.//13 - . B . V * "-- 4 f - JU/.â€¢.4 . 1 \ / t~- 41 F ... r,+ 4 - ---- r-,a 4 -4 0 1 - ../..t-vil, ~ ' 4L ' I 5 - / $ 9% .... 1,4 0, ' - -21,, -18114 , /1 9%/1\un 0/ , & . l-- <ff,~I' 4, , , . | 4 L. . - r, 90'L /36 y 3 J 0 - , ..v 7, Â¢\ 1, ~ ' ' I. a , 4. V 16-- -2/- 1 . =,5--i~. d 1 4-1 7 0 / 4 /,6 --4 4 , / 17'vic.,r., , i :&A 0 .Ap-< 6%4 014\ , '44'. 5 0 9 -7- - - ''4 0 P i,44 . 8. 13 4 00 L---1 El--1 2-4 - . f, V. ..4 6 -r-- \ r-,â€¢ 0 & 4/ --,*irix Â«3 - -, t 06 0* 4/ a 0.V L,44_ ... j r , 0 : 4 4 1 0 -/ 0 -rh. . I L-N--i i , j 1,0 0 r \ Â¥-1 1 r u .7 r-- . 0, 0 "C. All MU 0 4, 64 2 -; 2*% -t -4 1 1 1, r.. ... + 4 \,0 ' --T--- --lir- 5~ r-/wa~o, A , ' 1 L k -1- e / . 5 --EAV Ah \\\ 1/ .9.-14,1~4''f~ f.1. 1,4 7 , 1-LE= -En- ZILL- 1,1.Â·-%<Z.L.1 VA, 1. /1 . C r.5 1 , iwj , . 4 / 1 61/4. A ..2 1. 16 '. /- 1 />Ok 4.. ,Â« \,\ 97 O 04 0 \ 7 - / 34 00 4 ./If 0 L / .11Â» p 31.... Av, 8,0 4 1.4 - ' - --14 *r4&523 9/ 1 \ 1 9% I %20",C,1, ....'* 1.:, .Â¢ 6.4 0 \ 1 /# 1 , 3 4 / 5 0, \ r & 0'* , Â·16 440\ 4:os 4-Lf 8: 0 v ..4 1 0 G ' '- tzâ€ž1Fvt -4;1~-2 jg 1 4 Â£ * : E 44 'Y V J ThiCI ' , .... * 80/.44 2 , ' V\ . 1,â€¢' W . k $Â£ itÂ¢,1 -' 0 8 3,4 '14,4 . r / . ...0 / 0 1~ 0 '9 8 11-20-'* ..... / r. 21*el#bri f -4 1- V 0' , e .r / 4' I , 3 ,% .â€ž.r .04 Yfo/- & 0 . \, 1 0 - fl 4 ' / Ctz~ ' 9 R \ f " b 49, -- ~ '4>crl I - . y N.. 1 2 Â· to 14 1 r . , . 2 r - Â£14 1-1 4 1\.3 . r| .. .... -IN,â€ž. . . - 't f / ,/V ... ~ ..Nobii.2 5 41 1.. .-4. A-g,rav~ CA I. 1 : ' 1 , /t , 5 'b v- 4 Er'...4- 4.1 1 , / \14 -0... V / 0 . 0. , 1 rI 0 \ 4 \ 1 1 0 +~/ N Â¢ .8. : O -- \ 1 -. 52.- 1 / / 1440 1 - '7113--- 49 0 ...4 - \~~>N \i 6.0 k/\-- n . I r - r. ... I - 21 2 . b '.. --,...2,1 ~1-- / . -. 0 .ij ho , I S '1 t' â€¢f d P . \4 60 1 44 4 - . 0 2 ? . -- -24<144- , 0 fl ik . 11 i - \. ' b. o; .p\,/ . , - -4 - - 1 1__~ LZ-2 #.:i.29- - ~ - -- -- 1 1 70.7 har/* OM-MAM 4 -32 : 00 - <...i/. "* h - - 1 1 6 + 0 11 4 f :11- 6 ./ / 1 1 - 40., , 4 , BOV ' 1 4 \Â« ,- .. I ' 1 -7 ,--- , : S j . 50.9 ---------- 1 06 -6 -R--4/ / FO / 2 I 4 . 1 / 9 \ 1 .. ., 4 \ . li , 5 ' _ --- // '44 , 4 \ L.Â¥ . ./ / _1 -' ," 0 ~. 7Ii* 4~ ~*-w â€ž\ 1 / , 1 70~7 , 1 e \/ 2 93 1 2.. , 1 / ' 1 . / 2.V. a ./. , 1,0 - ' / c,â€¢Cpy q/Me#â€¢C\\.4'. - 1 1 2 1/ , I , / .... N A M Ai JON 100-10 SE PIOUTE .-,3 3AOID Nldg f