Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.511 Lazy Chair Dr.0062.2014.ASLU
THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0062.2014.ASLU _.. PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 1130 2002 PROJECTS ADDRESS -LAZY CHAIR ROAD PLANNER JUSTIN BARKER CASE DESCRIPTION 8040 GREEN LINE REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE STEEV WILSON DATE OF FINAL ACTION 11.20.14 (WITHDRAWN) DATE OF FINAL REFUND/ 1.8.15 PAYMENT CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 1.8.15 LES r - r . �m-wA,. �_ �.-. =G ,. . s 'Filee ldits Retard Navigate F r Rep rt$ Format Tabs elp IN "M - E G � 14: s Qg j . i �D£p P+1dm Custom Fiefs Routirlg�tatu4Fe a Summar} confi Routinq:History¢ "o Permit type aslu 1Aspe Ln amend Use Fermi i 0062 2014 ASLU a 00,;Ea gess 511 LAZY CHAIR DR i �. E o E , Gtr A�PEhI State CO Zip $111 g � Perm$U€armation Y ` ON 'Mauer erm� _ Routlnq ueue �a�lu0r '^ ' APP6ed 0� 2014 t a a 3 F M a S tus pending}fid ffs a ib z Proled PP m EDesrnption nPPLICATI011 FOR ESA$040 STREAlt1LII4E MARGINEISTIh1G SFR TO BE Issued DEMOLISHED FOR REDEVELOPMEW 0026.2014.ASLU 611 LAZY CHAR DRIVE G' ClosedlFinal �— k E � E'' ,Suhmdted STEEV ��1LSON t1orN Running Dans i �l Exprre�;07 20+2016 Ni .. last name LA?1'CHAIR LOT 2 LC i fird Warne LY CHAIR LOT 3 LLC w91 LAZY CHAIRD R t ASPEN CO$1611 s Phone1970j 2794109 Address . Applicant L Der is applicant? [Contrador is applicant? I E: STEEV 7SOUI� G ST First name�Fhune i4'012�41109 Cust29461MdrF �E ender, Last name First name l` Phone Address i ..... _ . Displays the perrriif lender's address AepenGald�(server angelas 1011 u 12aeas. .,�,t+°s•aa U6 102 S /d ce . 414go vo A Justin Barker From: Dustin Anderson <danderson@forumphi.com> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:45 AM To: Justin Barker Cc: Steev Wilson Subject: Re: 511 Lazy Chair Justin, J'S8 ll�tc�Z�t Thanks for getting back to me on this. We agree, lets close out the original 511 Lazy Chair 8040 Greenline Review, address the refund, and prepare the pre-application letter/review for lots 2 & 3 for 511 Lazy Chair road. Also, if you could refresh my memory, what process do we need to take to get a new address for lot 3 or is that a topic we address further down the road? Last, Is it possible to get on the P&Z schedule for January or will that date be assigned upon issue of the letter of completeness once we turn in the 8040 submissions with HOA schematic design approvals? Regards, On Tue,Nov 18, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Justin Barker<Justin.Barker Qacitvofaspen.com> wrote: Hi Dustin, Since the original application has been pulled from all agendas we would like for this to be formally withdrawn, and we will reimburse for any unbilled portion of the deposit. You mentioned bringing both Lots 2 & 3 in for review at the same time. We would like for these to be two new separate applications (as they are separate properties) with two deposits, but we would be more than happy to accommodate reviewing them at the same meeting. I hope this answers your questions. Let me know if you need anything else. Justin Barker A/CP I LEED Green Assoc I CNU-A Planner I City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 T 970.429.2797 1 F 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer; This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient,please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further,the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable,the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning,which is subject to change in the future,and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. Dustin Anderson - Assoc. AIA, LEED AP ARCHITECTURE I INTERIORS I PLANNING 715 W.Potain St. I Ste.204 Aspen,CO 81611 p. 970.319.7399 f. 866.770.5585 I forumphi.com 2 4 Special Meeting Planning& Zoning Commission September 9, 2014 MINUTES - August 12, 2014 Mr.Gibbs moved to approve the August 12, 2014 minutes, seconded by Ms.Tygre. Mr. Erspamer asked the wording a sentence under the Declaration of Conflict of Interested section be corrected.The change was noted to be made prior to finalizing the minutes. All in favor; motion carried. MINUTES - August 19, 2014 Mr. Gibbs moved to approve the August 19,2014 minutes, seconded by Ms.Tygre. All in favor, motion carried. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST None. Public Hearing - 511 Lazy Chair, 8040 Greenline Review Ms. Quinn submitted the affidavits of public notice as Exhibit C demonstrating notice has been properly provided. Mr. Barker, Planner with the Community Development Department, presented the project to the commission. It is an 8040 Greenline Review located at 511 Lazy Chair Road.The 8040 Greenline Review is a P&Z review of all development at,above or 150 ft measured below the elevation of 8,040 ft.The purpose of the review is to protect the ecological,environmental and scenic significance of the high elevation areas throughout a heightened review process. The subject property is approximately 2.4 acres in size in the rural residential zone district and is also part of the Arthur O Pfister Subdivision which is completely surrounded by the Maroon Creek Club PUD. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing single family home currently on the property and replace it with a new single family home. For this property,there was a recent subdivision amendment. Ordinance #12-2014 placed an additional restriction on the property that no development could occur above 8,060 ft except for what is reasonably necessary for utility infrastructure,storm water mitigation, maintenance and restoration of native landscaping and wildfire mitigation purposes.-The only development proposed at this time above the line is to bury the existing electrical line,which staff supports and finds it to be in line with those particular needs. Staff has found this project is generally in compliance with the review criteria for 8040 Greenline Review.The proposed development will be larger than the existing structure which inherently brings more impacts to the environment, but through the presented application,they have shown how they will minimize or complete mitigate those additional impacts created by the development. Staff is in support of this application.The engineering and parks departments have reviewed the projects and any concerns they have are included in the proposed resolution. Mr. Erspamer asked if there were any questions for staff. 2 Special Meeting Planning& Zoning Commission September 9, 2014 Mr. Erspamer asked what portion of the building can be above the 8,040 ft line. Mr. Barker stated the only portion that can be above this line are the items written into the ordinance#12-2014 which includes the utility infrastructure and storm water mitigation.The height of the building itself can be above the line, but the development cannot be located above the line. Mr. Erspamer asked if the foundation would be considered the development at which Mr. Barker confirmed as correct. Mr. Erspamer turned the floor over to the applicant. Mr. Dustin Anderson with Forum Phi Architecture is representing the applicant for the proposed development. Mr. Anderson stated they worked with the Parks Department prior to any demolition or construction on the site to discuss any concerns previously listed. He stated those concerns would be addressed prior to submitting for a permit.. In regards to the mass and height reflected in the drawings,the proposed structure is well below the height limitation as per the building ordinance. Mr. Erspamer asked if there were any questions for the applicant. Mr. Erspamer asked what seed would be used to restore the mitigated utility burial area so it will look like the natural terrain. Mr.Anderson stated an Aspen Parks Department approved seed mix will be used to restore the area.The approved seed mix does not rely on future irrigation to maintain the seeded areas. Mr. Erspamer asked Mr. Barker if the retaining walls are included in the criteria to be judged. Mr. Barker stated the retaining walls are not to be considered in the criteria for this project. Mr. Erspamer also asked that the groundwater is also not part of the discussion. Mr. Barker confirmed the groundwater is not to be considered in the criteria for this project. Mr. Erspamer opened for public comment. Mr. Rudi Scheidt lives at 120 Pfeifer which is adjacent to the property in the application. He understands what the committee does, but he is not sure the whole story has been told about the project. He has some environmental concerns as well as concerns about the scope and the nature of the size of the home. He is impressed by the drawings of the home presented with the application, but stated the drawings only represent 1/3 of the story.The other 2/3 of the home is underground.The proposed home is 30,000 ft below grade.The construction time for the home is estimated between four—six years. He has not seen the full plans and project timeline; but as a neighbor he is concerned about the excavation of the dirt to dig 55 ft down. He is asking the commission to delay the decision until they have the opportunity to review the full scope and staff has an opportunity to review the full environmental impact of this project. He is concerned about the homes in Aspen being built below grade because they have found a loophole within the laws to build massive structures. He questions what the true value of these homes going forward.The proposed 40,000 sf is four times the size of any home in the subdivision. In regards to the environmental impact he wanted to question staff's comments regarding the true impact based on the depth of the project as noted in item#2 on p 41 of the agenda packet. In regards to item#9 on p 42 of the packet, he is concerned that the Lazy Chair Road is small and narrow. He is not sure the road can handle stress from the number of excavation trucks necessary to haul out the dirt for the project,which he has heard is in the 100s. He also feels the additional truck traffic will have an adverse effect on the home sitting below the road. He is also .3 Special Meeting Planning& Zoning Commission September 9, 2014 concerned the length and noise of the construction will impact the natural life in the area as well. He noted the board's discussions in previous meetings regarding structures being out of place with the neighborhood.Although the above grade portion of the structure is in line with the neighboring structures,the overall size of the proposed structure is four times larger than anything in the neighborhood. Shlomo Ben-Hamoo also lives in area and has similar concerns as Mr.Scheidt. He believes there is also a helicopter pad in the application. He enjoys the space the neighborhood currently provides and prefers it stays the way it currently exists. He feels the proposed structure is too large for the neighborhood. He wanted to know if there is any limitation on the sf they can build. Ms. Phelan wanted to clarify a few items brought up.She assumes both of the gentlemen who spoke at public comment live in the Maroon Creek Club. In regards to what can be built in the Maroon Creek' Club,there are 10 single family lots off of Tiehack Rd that allow 10,000 sf of floor area.There are 33 lots that allow either 5,500 or 6,000 sf of floor area:All of them are allowed a 4,000 sf basement exemption and a 500 sf garage exemption based on county approval for the subdivision. In addition,the City Council approved on the previous night the allowance of landing of transferrable development rights on those properties of 500 or 750 sf of floor area.So some larger lots allow for larger sf totals.This meeting tonight is not a zoning review, but the Community Development Department is estimating the allowable floor area for this subject lot is 6,700 sf which tends to be mostly above grade. A certain amount of the basement will be included in the floor area. So people can build large basements which don't count towards the overall sf.allowed for the lot. The application states the basement is roughly 3,800 sf. Mr. Anderson stated there is a walk out and a sub grade basement, each being around 15,000 sf per floor. Then there is the main level and the master suite. Ms. Phelan then asked for the gross size of the building at which Mr.Anderson replied the size is about 38,000 sf. Ms. Phelan stated there currently is not any requirements for below grade caps. Ms. Phelan stated this property was annexed in 1996 at the same time as the Maroon Creek Club. Mr. Erspamer closed public comment. Mr. Erspamer opened for applicant rebuttal/clarification. Mr.Anderson wanted to respond to some of the public comments. In regards to the reference to the four to six year construction timeframe, he stated the actual numbers have not been released from the Forum Phi office.As they are proceeding with the development of the plans,they identified a conservative construction period of 3.5 years.They are working on engineering that back to the 18-24 months as requested by the Maroon Creek Club..He also wanted to.reiterate they are not part of the HOA.A helicopter pad was previously licensed with the FAA by Betty Pfister.The owner owns both lots 2 and 3 and remainder is in the Maroon Creek Club common space. Mr. Erspamer asked Mr.Anderson if he was aware of the estimated weight of the trucks. Mr. Anderson knows there is a weight restriction in the spring for the road. Mr. Erspamer asked Ms. Phelan to confirm if they should only be discussing the 8040 Greenline review at tonight's meeting. Ms. Phelan said they were not aware of the extra fully sub grade basement because it is not included in the design set, so the Engineering Department has not had an opportunity to even look at it in light of the review standards. Ms. Phelan feels the decision should be continued to allow for the application to be completely reviewed. 4 Special Meeting Planning & Zoninp- Commission September 9, 2014 Mr. Gibbs found the application and staff analysis to be lacking in detail regarding the size of the building. He would like to see a comparison of the footage above and below the 8040 line as well as a comparison to the existing building. If there are variances to be granted,this application would need to be presented again, so he feels it would be appropriate to continue it at this time. Ms.Tygre agreed. Mr. Erspamer stated he would like to see definitive criteria vs. "we anticipate" or"we feel". He is also in favor of continuing it as well. Mr.Goode asked the applicant if the Parks Department was made aware of the subgrade basement. Mr. Anderson stated it was not required until they submit for permit.Their submittal.is consistent with the 8040 Greenline Review. Ms.Tygre moved to continue the hearing until September 16;2014 with a purpose of determining the date certain for the continuance. Mr. Goode seconded the motion.All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 5:14 pm. Cindy Klob City Clerk's Office, Records Manager 5 5 AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, September 9, 2014 SPECIAL MEETING: 4:30 p.m. Sister Cities room 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen I. ROLL CALL s II. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. Public III. MINUTES IV. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST V. PUBLIC HEARINGS— A) 511 Lazy Chair, 8040 Greenline review VI. OTHER BUSINESS VII. ADJOURN Next Resolution Number: (`� A ,% P32 MEMORANDUM To: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRu: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director FROM: Justin Barker, Planner RE: 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road-8040 Greenline Review Resolution No._, Series of 2014 DATE: September 9, 2014 APPLICANT/OWNER: y- �� c •. Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC REPRESENTATIVE: i'-A - Forum Phi Architecture j LOCATION: 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road PID#: 2735-113-02-002 Is'`co _ • ;r CURRENT ZONING: 3 �� MAROOMCREEK RD low RR-Rural Residential SUMMARY: Locator Map The Applicant proposes demolition of the existing home and construction of a new single-family home on the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request with conditions. LAND USE REQUEST: Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: • 8040 Greenling Review - (Chapter 26.435.030, 8040 Greenline Review) for development within the 8040 Greenline review area. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final decision-making body. 1 P33 • 0 The purpose of the 8040 Greenline Review is to protect the ecological, environmental and scenic significance of high elevation areas through a heightened review process for new development. Development within the 8040 Greenline review area is subject to a heightened review to reduce impacts on the natural watershed and surface runoff, minimize air pollution, reduce the potential for avalanche, unstable slope, rockfall and mudslide and aid in the transition of agricultural and forestry land uses to urban uses. PROJECT SUMMARY: The subject property is approximately 2.4 acres and is located in the RR zone district. The property is located in the Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision, surrounded by the Maroon Creek Club PUD. There is currently a single-family home located on the property. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and construct a new single-family home. STAFF EVALUATION: The 8040 Greenline is the topographical line located 8040 feet above mean sea level. The Land Use Code states that no development shall be permitted at, above or 150 feet below (measured horizontally) the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a detennination that the proposed development complies with the review standards. N A' E S Figure A Property Boundary 8040 Greenline ■■•■■■■ Subject to Review 2 P34 As shown in Figure A, the 8040 Greenline runs through the middle of the property, making almost the entire property subject to review. This property also has an additional requirement that no development may occur above 8060 feet above mean sea level, (per Ordinance No. 12, Series of 2014) except as reasonably necessary for utility infrastructure, storm water mitigation, maintenance, or restoration of native landscape, and wildfire mitigation needs. The only development above this line that is proposed is to bury the existing electrical line underground. Staff finds this to be a benefit to the site by hiding utility lines and preserving the natural views. Generally, most of the review criteria focuses on the suitability of the site for development, the environmental impacts of the development, and the availability of services and infrastructure for the development. The new development is larger than the existing, therefore creating more impacts to the environment. However, the applicant has demonstrated in the application how these impacts will either be minimized or mitigated.' Since this lot has been previously developed, the services and infrastructure already exist. Staff finds the project to be in conformance with the review criteria. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends.the Planning and Zoning Commission approve 8040 Greenline Review with conditions. REFERRAL DEPARTMENTS: Engineering and Parks Departments have reviewed the application and any applicable comments are included in the proposed resolution. RECOMMENDED MOTION(ALL MOTIONS ARE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No. __, Series of 2014, approving 8040 Greenline Review for the project located at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road with conditions." EXHIBITS: A. Review Criteria—8040 Greenline review standards B. Application 3 P35 • � - RESOLUTION NO._ (SERIES OF 2014) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 511 LAZY CHAIR RANCH ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, ARTHUR O. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISIONEXEMPTION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL 14, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 42 AT PAGE 45, AS RECEPTION- NO.4033369, ECEPTIONNO.4033369,PITKIN COUNTY;COLORADO. Parcel ID:2735-113-02-002. . WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, requesting approval of 8040 Greenline Review for the construction of a new single-family home at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road, legally described as Lot 2, Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption, according to the plat thereof recorded April 14, 1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45, as Reception No. 4033369, Pitkin County, Colorado; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS,the property is zoned Rural Residential (RR); and, WHEREAS,upon initial review.of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on September 9, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. Series of 2014,by a to L — vote, approving 8040 Greenline Review; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public cominent; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds. that the development proposal meets, or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS,the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. Resolution No. Series 2014 Page 1 of 6 P36 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO THAT: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves 8040 Greenline Review for the property located at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road. Section 2• Approval•of 8040 Greenline review for this.project is not a reliance on the dimensions provided in'the application. All aspects of this project shall still meet the dimensional requirements of the zone district in which the. property is located, and all other requirements of the Land Use Code, as applicable. Section 3• Final design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Titles 21, 28, and 29. The design for the site must meet the Engineering Design Standards which includes the Urban Runoff Management Plan requirements, Construction Mitigation Plan, and Construction and Excavation Standards. Section 4: The removal or relocation of any trees will require a Tree Removal permit.from the Parks Department in accordance with Title 13 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, prior to any removal or relocation. The removal of the existing fence that currently runs through the drip lines of trees will need to be addressed from the Parks Department,prior to Building Pen-nit submittal. Tred protection fencing shall be up prior to any construction or demolition on this property. A fence line shall be erected that keeps the existing natural vegetation safe and secure from any activity around the proposed development. The proposed development shall minimize disturbance of native vegetation &preserve groupings of Gamble Oak. Section 5• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein,unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6• This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under,or by virtue of the ordinances Resolution No. Series 2014 Page 2 of 6 P37 repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 91h day of September,2014. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Debbie Quinn,Asst. City Attorney .LJ Erspamer,Chair ATTEST: Cindy Klob,Records Manager Exhibits: L Approved Site Platz H Approved Elevations Resolution No. Series 2014 Page 3 of 6. • • P38 EXHIBIT I I. ,I , t 'LWa6TW19f091FMfA�', 7 f • loa,�cmc I _ � .1 i , , 0 >rEr.�t r � 'I > rp .Glie¢,mk�omre 1 II'I g "e N r LOWER LEVEL ELEV=802:' ':t'.'l { t!, , il4.j, RELOCATED EVERGREEN RELOCATED DECIDUOUS PROPOSED EVERGREEN `? • ( 1 I ,r �. r PROPOSED DECIDUOUS I 1 Resolution No._, Series 2014 Page 4 of 6 P39 • EXHIBIT H bg77 ZZE `P..00nI_ J --- ❑U 1a- - -: . T � I Ss r A 4- r' ILI . u I El Resolution No. Series 2014 Page 5 of 6 P40 Resolution No. Series 2014 Page 6 of 6 P41 EXHIBIT A 26.435.030.C. 8040 Greenline review standards. No development shall be permitted at, above or one hundred fifty (150), feet below the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the.City. Staff Findings: The Engineering Department has reviewed the Geological Hazards and Soils Reports submitted in the application and has determined that the parcel is suitable for development considering the review criteria listed above. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant. adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects of water pollution. Staff Findings: Runoff from impervious surfaces is proposed to be retained and infiltrated �on site. Overflow:will be released at historic undeveloped flow rate. Rip rap and vegetation will be used to dissipate energy leaving the site. All Aspen water requirements will be met. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3, The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. Staff Findings: The applicant has proposed a dust and debris control plan as well as emissions control for construction .vehicles in order to minimize the effects to the air. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. The design and location of any .proposed development, road or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Staff Findings: A large portion of the structure will be located below grade and is designed to work with the existing terrain. The existing road will be used and no trails are proposed. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and.natural land features. Staff Findings: Soil nail walls will be used for shoring to minimize the disturbance to the site. Ordinance 12, Series of 2014 prohibits development above 8060', other than utilities, storm water mitigation, native landscaping and wildfire mitigation. The proposed structure will be located similarly to the existing.structure and will generally maintain the existing natural features on site. Staff finds this criterion to be met. P42 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading,maintain open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Staff Findings: There is only one proposed structure located where the current structure sits. No additional access will be created. Only grading necessary for the construction of the home and to control stormwater will be done. Staff finds this criterion.to be met. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Staff Findings: The building is under the allowable height limit and is.set largely below grade. The building is designed with vegetated roofs and walls to help blend into the natural landscape. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Staff Findings A City of Aspen potable water tank is located just west of this property. The bottom of the tank sits 31.5 feet higher than the upper floor of the house creating approximately 13.5 psi of static head. A booster pump may be required for the upper floors depending on flows. A fire pump will be needed for the sprinkler system and an existing hydrant will be moved closer to the driveway. Overhead electrical.service is from the west and is proposed to be relocated underground. Sewer will be discharged to the manhole to the northeast. All other utilities will run under the driveway. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development and said roads can be properly maintained. Staff Findings: There is an existing driveway access that connects to Lazy Chair Ranch Road feeding into Tiehack Road. These roads can all be properly maintained. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Staff Findings: The proposed driveway is wide enough for a fire truck and snow plow to access and has a turnaround large enough for a "Y" style turn around that has been demonstrated in the application packet. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 11. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board are implemented in the proposed development,to the greatest extent practical. Staff Findings: The proposed development does not have any effect on any of the Open Space and Trails Board adopted regulatory plans. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Ju� ,.. EXHIBIT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESSF PROPERTY: t-QW �_ �/� , Aspen, CO SC DULE PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 20 jq STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin l:Q� - C`�-��L I (Warne, please print) being or representing an Applicant to _ City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: VPublication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing: A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of-notice: By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Developrifitf Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(4)(2). of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice'was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage --y- -prepaid:,U.S-mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the propertyI-Gb .ecf to the development application. The names and addresses of ;�r��t�c� Vin.,=.i`��J• rty7.own erg shall be.those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they =;�KO"kl c;e'appearedcnp more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. _4 �i nti L`t rlf,,i!0�'a 37�R U" r ' copy,,of flze�ov�%rs and goti ernme�atal agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach.: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood out?-each su777771a7y, including the method of public notification and a copy of any doCu772e77tatio77 that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt I requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and. new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, tlne proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection yin the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature l The for oing"Affidavit of Notice" was ackn wledged befo me this_/_tj ay Of ; 20 ,by PUBLIC NOTICE—� RE:511 LAZY CHAIRRANCH O 8040 WITNESS MyHAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL GREENLREVIEW ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday,September 9'2014' ,2014,at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m.before the Aspen My commission expires: .17 Planning and Zoning Commission,Sister Cities Meeting Room,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,As- pen,to consider an application submitted by the Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC,clo.Millard J.Zimet,P 604 W.Main Street,Aspen,CO 81611,represent- ed by Forum Phi Architecture,for the property lo- cated Public at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Rd.The applicant is requesting 8040 Greenline Review approval for Notary Pub the construction of a single-family home.The prop- erty is legally described as Lot 2,Arthur O.Pfister Fully Development Lands subdivision Exemption, KARE =AE ERSo according to the plat thereof recorded April 14, IC1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45,as Reception No. 4033369,Pitkin County'�Colorado,Parcel ID STADO273511302002. For further information,contact Justin Baker at the City of Aspen Community De- NOT002767velopment Department,130 S.Galea Sl.,Aspen, TENTS AS tin PLICABLE:CO,(970)429.2797,1ustin.barker�cit ofaspen.com. My Commruary 15,1016 s/LJ Ersoamer Chair ION " Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission pl,`.`,,Published in the Aspen Times-on-August 21,2014 POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on August - 21_2014(1°471275) r 4ND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-.103.3 I - AFFIDAVIT OF?UBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304:060(E), ASPEN LAND:USE.CODE - ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: - 11 L A.2"7 9-C). ,Aspen,CO - SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: _ el , 20 Il STATE`OF COLORADO ) i = } ss. 1 _ County of Pitkin 1, Sr-E+=V IQtLS0 (name; please print) _ beng.or representing.an .Applicant to the City Of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally - certify .that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26:304:060 (E)of the Aspen'Land Use Code in the:following.manner: C trl Publication of notice: By the:publication:in,the legal notite sectiomof an official _ paper or a paper of general, circulation.in the City of Aspen at least fifteen..(l 5) _ days prior to the publichearing. A copy gl'the.publication is attached`hereto. 5'� fasting, of notice: By posting of notice, which forth was obtained `frorn the Community Development Department, which was niade''of suitable, waterproof } - materials; which was not less than twenty-two (22)' inches wide and'twenty-sixI _ .(26) inches high, and x0ich was composed of letters not less than one inch. in height. Said notice was-posted at least fifteen (15)-days-prior to the-public,hearing, on the 2S day of A�. usi , 20 tom, to and aneluding'the date and'time _ of the public hearing. kli rotogralyh af'the pasted notice (sign) is attached hereto. _ 4w Mailing of notice. By the mailing of:a .notice obtained from the Comiitunity Development Department,. which.contains-the information described in Section = 26.304.060(E)(2)'of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least,fifteen (15)days prior to ..the public hearing, notice was-hand, delivered or mailed by Best class postage - prepaid.U.S. mail to all owners of property within_three.hundred (300),feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of - property owners shall`be those on the currenttax_records of Pitkin County as they _ appeared no niore than si,:ty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A _ copj,of the owners and'gouernmental-q encies so noticedis attached`hereto. _ �✓%4 ARteighhurhood Outreach: Applicant attests .that neighborhood outreach, _ summarized and attached; was conducted.,prior to the first public, hearing ias required in Section 26.30=1.035, neighborhood Outreach. A copy qJ the -neighborhood outreach swnnttttn1, including the method of..public notification and _ u copy of ant;documentation that )vas presented to;the public"i attached-hereto. (continued on r7e_rt page) - AIA Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified.mailing of notice,, return receipt - requested;to affected mineral estate ow{ners.by at least thirty(30) days prior to the - date scheduled for the initial public hearing,on the application of development. _ The, names sand addresses of�mineral estate owners_chair be those, on the current , tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivi"signs, PDs.that create_more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice = requirement. _ Rezoning or test tainendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is ill any = way to be changed or amended incidental.to or as'part of a,general revision of this _ Title, or whenever the,text of this Title is to be'amended; whether such revision be _ mane by repeal of this Title and enactment of'a new land use regulation, or [ otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal _ description of,:and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in.the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the � proposed zoning map shall be available for public'inspection in the planning _ agency during all business hours for fifteen (1S) days:prior to the public bearing - on such amendments. ; Signature _ The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before:Ine this` 25`clay of - 20/ , by SAgV Gii 4&cS -, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL _ �iLi n�wnaANISARavi' My commission,expires Y1171, 27,017 ! _ NOTARY PUSLIC- STATE OF'COLORAOO r -_ NOTARY 10 0:20014019451 MY COM MISSIONEXPiRESAUGUST1T.20tT � TT - otary Pub Ic JJJ i. - I ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: i = •COPY OF THE PUBLICATION _ •PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN)- _ • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED _ BYMAIL _. • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OFMINERA L ESTAE OWNERSNOTICE_ ;. _ AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. ¢24-65.5-103:3 I ............. . ....N zlki 1 _ q t S1 _. l 7 k�, PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 511 LAZY CHAIR RANCH RD—8040 GREENLINE REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, September 9, 2014, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, c/o Millard J. Zimet, P.C., 604 W. Main .Street, Aspen, CO 81611, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, for the property located at 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Rd. The applicant is requesting 8040 Greenline Review approval for the construction of a single-family home. The property is legally described as Lot 2, Arthur O. Pfister Fully Development Lands Subdivision Exemption, according to the plat thereof recorded April 14, 1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45, as Reception No. 4033369, Pitkin County, Colorado, Parcel ID 273511302002. For further information, contact Justin Baker at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen, CO, (970)429.2797,justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. s/LJ Erspamer.Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on August 21, 2014 City of Aspen Account Easy feeler bels A sem ri ftp ILAVERYW51 _ 130 a' - T' KPKJNI ;cam` A$Rr-N. CO Steil I ASN,GO 0IGfI ASPEN,;C0=916t; - 0133 PROSPEdTOR RD $MI4 cib j6SHUA AND' S&J IP VEsTMr I*T's I3�Wc `N HEIDT RlIDI E J &CAR _ 2Z N L.AXSftiI t i ,; l 'O.'20,PFE'IFER PL. _ C11 ++ [ ; I1.;f3i) r'fit, Q 81'09 1' _ r - , °LGR7li♦wt 10 a� tymnt AVER ,5� rha r mgr{l. r6v tar! F?et '�A, 9�0D d-� �4 RY _ RECEPTION#: 611208, 06/18/2014 at 01:13:06 PM, 1 OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code ORDINANCE Janice K. Vos Caudill ORDINANCE N0. 12 , Pitkin County, CO (SERIES OF 2014) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AMENDMENT AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR THE ARTHUR O. PFISTER SUBDIVISION LOTS 2 AND 3, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID Lot 2: 2735-113-02-002 Parcel ID Lot 3: 2735-113-02-003 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the properties known as Lots 2 and 3, Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision Exemption, located at 511 Lazy Chair Lane; Aspen, Colorado, from owners Lazy Chair Lot 2, LLC; and, Lazy Chair Lot 3, LLC, represented by Steev Wilson of Forum Phi Architects; and, WHEREAS, the application seeks to amend the Subdivision approval granted by Pitkin County prior to annexation of the property into the City of Aspen and amend the annexation agreement with the City of Aspen, both of which set forth certain development allowances and restrictions; and, WHEREAS, the properties were annexed into the City of Aspen by the adoption of Ordinance 34, Series 1996, which ordinance accepted certain development allowances and restrictions placed on the property by Pitkin County; and WHEREAS, the properties were also subject of a Water Service Agreement with the City of Aspen (an exhibit to Ordinance 40, Series 1996) which agreement specified certain development allowances and restrictions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.480.090, City Council may approve minor amendments to an existing subdivision approval; and, WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 26.304, the City Council may amend the provisions of a previously adopted ordinance, specifically Ordinance No. 40, Series 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from City Engineering, Building Department, Fire Protection District, Parks Department, and City Utilities as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, opened a duly noticed public hearing, considered the Application, received presentation from the Applicant, considered the comments and recommendations of the Community Development Director, considered comments and recommendations from other members of City staff and referral agencies, considered comments and suggestions offered by members of the public, considered question responses by staff and the Applicant, considered comments and discussion by fellow Council members; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that the development proposal with certain conditions attached meets or exceeds all applicable development standards of all applicable land use reviews as identified herein; and, Ordinance No. 12, Series 2014. Page 1 of 4 WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that this ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO,as follows: An amendment to the Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision Exemption, Lots 2 and.3, and an amendment to the development provisions of the water service agreement for the Lots are hereby approved with the following conditions of approval: Section 1• Applicability of City Development Requirements The allowances and limitations for the development of Lots 2 and 3 approved by Pitkin County and contained within City of Aspen Ordinance No. 40, Series-1996; the provisions of the water service agreement related to development allowances and limitations; the subdivision plat approved by Pitkin County and recorded at Book 42 Page 45; and, previous land use approvals granted by Pitkin County including all finding, interpretations, and amendments shall be considered voided upon recordation of the Subdivision Amendment Plat. Lots 2 and 3 shall remain subdivided lots within the City of Aspen, each with one development right, and shall allow development in .accordance with the City of Aspen development allowances and limitations including, but not limited to, the City of Aspen Land Use Code, the Rural Residential (RR) zone district as may be amended from time to time or as the property may be otherwise rezoned to another district, the Urban Runoff Management Plan, and applicable building and fire codes. The provisions of the water service agreement and the City's standards and requirements pertaining to the delivery of potable water to the properties shall be unaffected by this Ordinance. Lot 2 shall be subject to an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to Chapter 26.435 of the City's Land Use Code as said Chapter may be amended from time to time. Lot 3 is not within the 8040 Greenline area and is not subject to this review. The developer of both lots shall work with the City of Aspen Parks Department to minimize disturbance to native vegetation and preserve groupings of the native Gambrel Oak. Section 2: Plat Filing Pursuant to Chapter 26.490 — Approval Documents, the record owners of Lots 2 and 3 shall prepare and submit a Subdivision Amendment Plat to be reviewed to ensure each item and condition of approval is documented to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the City Engineer, and the City Attorney prior to final signatures by the Mayor and recordation. A Development Agreement is not needed. The Subdivision Amendment Plat shall grant a perpetual 30-foot wide access easement through Lot 3 for the purposes of providing adequate access to Lot 2. The easement shall be generally along the alignment of the existing driveway. The subdivision plat shall contain a note prohibiting development above the 8060-foot elevation line on Lot 2, except as reasonable necessary for utility infrastructure, storm water mitigation, maintenance or restoration of native landscape, and wildfire mitigation needs. Ordinance No. 12,Series 2014. Page 2 of 4 The subdivision plat shall contain .a note prohibiting development below the golf cart path on Lot 3, except as reasonable necessary for utility infrastructure, storm water mitigation, maintenance or restoration of native landscape, and wildfire mitigation needs. Section 3: Zoning Map Correction The Community Development Director shall cause the Official Zone District map to reflect Lots 1, 2, and 3 of the Pfister Subdivision as located in the Rural Residential (RR) Zone District without a Planned Development Overlay. The map incorrectly indicates this overlay. Section 4: Representations Preserved representations and commitments -made by the Applicant pursuant to the All material re re . P . rin or documentation development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing presented before the Community Development Department or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions. Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly submit all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within one year of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: First Amendment to the Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Lots 2 and 3, City of Aspen, Pitkin County Colorado, as more fully described in City of Aspen City Council Ordinance No. Series 2014. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the Ordinance No. 12,Series 2014. Page 3 of 4 FitN, date ,of�xpublication ;:of the.-ponce of final develaprnent approval a's�-required under" Section . 26 3404 070{A) The!:xi his` of'.referendum shall be limited as "set forth` inthe Colorado Constitution and the Ashen Horne Rule Charter:' This Ordinance shall not aft d any existing litigat" and shall not operate as Van abaternerit of, any action or pr©ceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed orarnended - s herein provided, and the same:shall be and concluded under such prior ordinances` Section 7: If any sectlon,;ysubse' ciion,:sentence;clause, phrase, or porton of this Ordinance is for any reason field invalid 'ar unconstitutional`in a court 'of competent jurisdiction; such portion shall be deemed a separate,adistinci and indcp6rident provision and shall not affect the validity of°the remainiiig;port ons thereof. Section g: That tlae"-,City Clerk is direeted,rupon.the adaptaan of thjs Ordinance,`to,record a copy, af,this Ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. :j Section'9 A public hearing on the Ordinance was held,on the 27`x' day"of May, 2014,, at 5.00 in the City � w 'CouncifChambers,,City hall, 130 South GalenarStreet Aspen Colorado;.fifteen{15)days prior to which�:heanng a public notice of the same was published xn a,newspaper of general circulation within the.City of Aspen Sectron'.20 , This ordinance sha1Fbecorne effective thirty (30) days following final adoption. INTRCDDUCED, READ AND- pRDI✓RET7r:.PULISIIIED; as prpvided by law, by the City Coun"c2 ii f the`City of.Aspen on tfie a l 2 '"day of lVlay,2014 Att Linda Manning,City Clerk' elk,S`'adroit,Mayo FINALLY,adopted;.passcd and approvedth�s�7 'day of May;2014: a Attl t: inch. Annuc►g, Yty Clerk Steven Ska" ion,Mayor �M U Approved as to form mes R True,Gray Attoraey . Qrdinarice No. 12,Series 20l4 Page 4 of 4 74 , , r °a " THE CITY OF ASPEN ' Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: July 29, 2014 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0062.2014.ASLU-8040 Greenling review, 511 Lazy Chirt. Justin Barker will be the planner for the land use.case. ❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Th ou, hqfffifer P el , Deputy Planning Director City of As , Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New SPA New PUD Yes No_C Subdivision, SPA, or PUD(creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allo tme is Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging RECEIVED JUL 4 2014 Forum Phi CITYC)F ASN 715 W MainD�E(RHT Aspen, CO 816 Ste 204 P: (970)279-4157 F: (866)770-5585 1405—511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2—8040 Greenline Review Land Use Application 2014/07/10 Section Title Pg(s) I Completed Land Use Application 1-7, 9-11 Review criteria response to attachment 4 8 Draft of Public Notice Agreement 12-13 Signed fee agreement 14-15 II Pre-application Conference Summary 16-18 III Total deposit for review of the application 19 IV Street address and legal description of parcel 20 V Applicant's name (Deed &Title) 21-22, 23-35 Consent and Authorization to Represent 36 V1 1s'Amendment Final Plat, Site Improvement Surveys See plan set VII HOA Compliance Form 37 Letter from the HOA regarding Schematic Design Approval 38-41 VIII Written description of the proposal See pg 8, #7 VIIII Written responses to all review criteria 42-44 X Vicinity map with adjacent properties list 45-46 10 Copies of the complete application packet and associated drawings A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format - Enclosed thumb drive A 3D file will be presented at the public hearing SOI " REPOS RE"; U X 11 H Q2A R-ps 20 JUL152014 R. CITY OF ASPEN MIAJ1' CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET THE OTY OF ASPEN Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Development Application Fee Policy,Fee Schedule and Agreement for Payment Form 2. Land Use Application Form 3. Dimensional Requirements Form 4. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/Submittal Requirements Key 5. General Summary of Your Application Process 6. Public Hearing Notice Requirements 7. Affidavit of Notice All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk's Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at www.aspenpitkin.com, City Departments, City Clerk, Municipal Code,and search Title 26. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described. Also,depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, insufficiencies,or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and Staff time. Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. • ao�o2• 0(4 . ALU ATTACHMENT 2—LAND USE APPLICATION RECEIVED j4 9 .� qp'-1 Name: ARTHUR O PFISTER EXEMPTION Lot: 2 PEW— Location: 511 Lazy Chair Road, Aspen CO 81611 �lINITY Q He (Indicate street address, lot&block number, legal description where appropriate) V M�� Parcel ID#(RE UIRED) 273511302002 APPLICANT• Name: LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC - C/O Forum Phi Address: 715 W Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone#: 970-279-4109 - Steev Wilson REPRESENTATIVE• Name: Millard Zimet Address: 604 W Main St Aspen, CO 81611 Phone#: 970-925-9009 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ® ESA—8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(& SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc.) Existing single family residence, to be demolished for redevelopement. 0025.2014.ASLU - 511 Lazy Chair Dr., Minor Subdivision Amendment PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc.) Proposed approval of 8040 Greenline Land Use Review for new construction of single family residence Have you attached the following? FEES DuE: $ 4490 0 Pre-Application Conference Summary 0 Attachment 91, Signed Fee Agreement 0 Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form ® Response to Attachment 44, Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. 2 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2 Applicant: Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC - C/O Forum Phi Location: 511 Lazy Chair Road Zone District: RR Lot Size: 2.4 Acres Lot Area: 55.740.4 SF (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: N/A Proposed: N/A Number of residential units: Existing: Single Proposed: Single Number of bedrooms: Existing: 7 BR Proposed: 9 BR Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 3523 SFAllowable: 6714.8 SFProposed: 6710 SF Principal bldg. height: Existing: 22 FT Allowable: 28 FT Proposed: 25 Ft Access. bldg. height: Existing: N/A Allowable: 28 FT Proposed: N/A On-Site parking: 2+ 2 3+ % Site coverage: Existing:Imoo N/A Required: N/A Proposed.No N/A — % Open Space: Existing:Requirement Required:Requirement Proposed:Requirement Front Setback: Existing: N/A Required: 30 Ft Proposed: 30 FT Rear Setback: Existing: N/A Required: 20 FT Proposed: 20 FT Combined F/R: Existing: N/A Required: 50 FT Proposed: 50 FT Side Setback: Existing. N/A Required: 20 FTProposed. 20 FT Side Setback: Existing: N/A Required: 20 FT Proposed: 20 FT Combined Sides: Existing: N/A Required: 40 FT Proposed: 40 FT Distance Between Existing No Requirement Required.No RequirementProposed: No Requirement Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: None Variations requested: None 3 ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the in second column. These numbers correspond to the key on page 9. For multiple reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collated packets. All drawings must include an accurate graphic scale Type of Review App. Submission Requirements Process Type(See Process Number of Required Submittal See key on page 9. Description in Att.S) Packets 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1-7 8-10,35 P&Z 10 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION 1-7, 8-10,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35 2 for 0 Admin., 10 for P&Z STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 • HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW 1-7, 13, 14,35 P&Z 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE 1-7, 15, 16, 35 P&Z 10 CONDITIONAL USE 1-7, 9, 17 P&Z 10 SPECIAL REVIEW 1-7, Additional Submission Req.depend P&Z 10 on nature of the Special Review Request. SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21,35 P&Z,AND CITY COUNCIL 20 EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21,35 CITY COUNCIL 10 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7, 22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 LOT SPLIT 1-7, 22 CITY COUNCIL 10 CODE AMENDMENT 1-4, 7, 23 P&Z,AND CITU COUNCIL 20 WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7, 16, 24, 25, 26, 27, 35 ADMIN.OR P&Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P&Z SATELITE DISH OVER 24"IN 1-7 ADMIN.OR P&Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P&Z DIAMETER RES.DESIGN STANDARDS 1-7, 9, 28, 29, 30 P&Z OR DRAG 10 VARIANCE GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7, Additional Submission Req.depend ADMIN.,OR P&Z,AND/OR CC 2 for Admin., 10 for P&Z,20 for P on nature of the Exemption Request. (BASED ON EXEMPTION TYPE &Z and CC CONDOMINIUMIZATION 1, 31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2 PUD 1-7,32, 33, 35 CONCEPTUAL-P&Z,AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC(Submit FINAL-P&Z,AND CC Separately for Final PUD Review) LODGE PRESERVATION PUD 1-7, 35 P&Z,AND CC 20 4 PUD AMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN.,OR P&Z,AND/OR CC 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z,20 for P (BASED ON AMENDMENT TYPE &Z and CC SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA 1-7, 35 CONCEPTUAL—P&Z,AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC(Submit SPA FINAL-P&Z,AND CC Separately for Final SPA) AMENDMENT TO SPA 1-7 ADMIN.,OR P&Z AND CC 2 for Admin.,20 for P& Z and CC (BASED ON SIGNIFICANCE OF AMENDMENT TEMPORARY USE 1-7 ADMIN.OR CC(BASED ON 2 for Admin.,10 for City Council DURATION TIME ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 1-7, 9 ADMIN OR P&Z(BASED ON IF 2 for Administrative Review THE PROPOSAL MEETS REVIEW STANDARDS REZONING 1-7 P&Z AND CC 20 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1-7, 34 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9 VARIANCE * Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements. ** A pre-application conference with a Planner should be conducted prior to submitting any land use application. Please call 920-5090 to schedule a pre-application conference. 5 o • • ATTACHMENT 4-CONT'D-SUBMITTAL KEY 1.Land Use Application with 12. Accurate elevations(in relation to system in the area of the proposed Applicant's name, address and telephone mean sea level)of the lowest floor, subdivision.The contents of the plat shall number, contained within a letter signed including basement,of all new or be of sufficient detail to determine by the applicant stating the name,address, substantially improved structures;a whether the proposed subdivision will and telephone number of the verification and recordation of the actual meet the design standards pursuant to representative authorized to act on behalf elevation in relation to mean sea level to Land Use Code Section 26.480.060(3).20. of the applicant. which any structure is constructed;a Subdivision GIS Data. demonstration that all new construction or 2. The street address and legal substantial improvements will be 21. A landscape plan showing location, description of the parcel on which anchored to prevent flotation,collapse or size, and type of proposed landscape development is proposed to occur. lateral movement of any structure to be features. constructed or improved;a demonstration 3. A disclosure of ownership of the that the structure will have the lowest 22. A subdivision plat which meets the parcel on which development is proposed floor,including basement,elevated to at terms of this chapter,and conforms to the to occur,consisting of a current certificate least two(2)feet above the base flood requirements of this title indicating that no from a title insurance company, or elevation,all as certified by a registered further subdivision may be granted for attorney licensed to practice in the State of these lots nor will additional units be built Colorado,listing the names of all owners without receipt of applicable approvals of the property, and all mortgages, 13. A landscape plan that includes pursuant to this chapter and growth judgments,liens,easements,contracts and native vegetative screening of no less than management allocation pursuant to agreements affecting the parcel, and fifty(50)percent of the development as Chapter 26.470. demonstrating the owner's right to apply viewed from the rear(slope)of the parcel. for the Development Application. All vegetative screening shall be 23. The precise wording of any maintained in perpetuity and shall be proposed amendment. 4.An 8 1/2"x 11"vicinity map locating replaced with the same or comparable the subject parcel within the City of material should it die. 24. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of Aspen. one(1")inch equals ten(10')feet or one 14. Site sections drawn by a registered (1") inch equals twenty (20') feet, 5.A site improvement survey including architect, landscape architect, or including before and"after" photographs topography and vegetation showing the engineer shall be submitted showing all (simulations) specifying the location of current status of the parcel certified by a existing and proposed site elements, the antennas,support structures,transmission registered land surveyor, licensed in the top of slope, and pertinent elevations buildings and/or other accessory uses, State of Colorado. (This requirement, or above sea level. access,parking,fences,signs,lighting, any part thereof, may be waived by the landscaped areas and all adjacent land Community Development Department if 15. Proposed elevations ofthe uses within one-hundred fifty(150') feet. the project is determined not to warrant a development,including any rooftop Such plans and drawings should survey document.) equipment and how it will be screened. demonstrate compliance with the Review Standards of this Section. 6. A site plan depicting the proposed 16. Proposed elevations of the layout and the project's physical development,including any rooftop 25. FAA and FCC Coordination. relationship to the land and it's equipment and how it will be screened. Statements regarding the regulations of surroundings. the Federal Aviation Administration 17. A sketch plan of the site showing (FAA) and the Federal Communications 7. A written description of the existing and proposed features which are Commission(FCC). proposal and a written explanation of relevant to the review. how a proposed development complies 26. Structural Integrity Report from a with the review standards relevant to the 18. One(1)inch equals four hundred professional engineer licensed in the development application. (400) feet scale city map showing the State of Colorado. location of the proposed subdivision, all 8. Plan with Existing and proposed adjacent lands owned by or under option 27. Evidence that an effort was made to grades at two-foot contours,with five-foot to the applicant,commonly known locate on an existing wireless intervals for grades over ten(10)percent. landmarks,and the zone district in which telecommunication services facility the proposed subdivision and adjacent site including coverage/interference 9. Proposed elevations of the development properties are located. analysis and capacity analysis and a brief statement as to other reasons for 10.A description of proposed 19. A plat which reflects the layout of success or no success. construction techniques to be used. the lots,blocks and structures in the proposed subdivision.The plat shall 28. Neighborhood block plan at 11. A Plan with the 100-year floodplain be drawn at a scale of one(1)equals one I"=50' (available from City Engineering line and the high water line. hundred(100)feet or larger.Architectural Department) Graphically show the front scales are not acceptable. Sheet size shall portions of all existing buildings on both be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six sides of the block and their setback from (36)inches. If it is necessary to place the the street in feet. Identify parking and plat on more than a one(1)sheet,an index front entry for each building and locate shall be included on the first sheet. A any accessory dwelling units along the vicinity map shall also appear on the first alley. (Continued on next page.) sheet showing the subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city and the street 6 Indicate whether any portions of the 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the houses immediately adjacent to the location, height, type and luminous subject parcel are one story (only one intensity of each above grade fixture. living level). Estimate the site illumination as measured in foot candles and include minimum, 29. Roof Plan. maximum, and average illumination. Additionally, provide comparable 30. Photographic panorama. Show examples already in the cotmnunity that elevations of all buildings on both sides of demonstrate technique,specification,and/ the block,including present condition of or light level if they exist. the subject property. Label photos and mount on a presentation board 31. A condominium subdivision exemption plat drawn with permanent ink on reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall be twenty-four(24)inches by thirty-six(36) inches with an unencumbered margin of one and one-half(1 1/2)inches on the left hand side of the sheet and a one-half(1/2)inch margin around the other three(3)sides of the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.090. 32. A description and site plan of the proposed development including a statement of the objectives to be achieved by the PUD and a description of the proposed land uses,densities,natural features,traffic and pedestrian circulation, off-street parking,open space areas, infrastructure improvements,and site drainage. 33. An architectural character plan generally indicating the use,massing, scale,and orientation of the proposed buildings. 34. A written description of the variance being requested. 7 511 Lazy Chair Lot: 2 —8040 Greenline Review Criteria Response to Land Use Application, attachment 4 1. Land Use Application, enclosed pages 1-15 2. Arthur O Pfister Exemption, 511 Lazy Chair Road, Parcel 9 273511302002 3. Disclosure of ownership, enclosed pages 21-22 4. Vicinity Map, enclosed page 45 5. Site Improvement Survey, Historical Survey, and V Amendment to Final Plat, enclosed within drawing set 6. Site Plans - Existing, see Z1-005, Proposed, see Z1-011 7. This application for 8040 Greenline Review demonstrates our calculation of net lot area through the historical grade survey provided by Colorado licensed surveyor. This lot is not affected by many intents of the 8040 Greenline Review. This lot is on a stand alone knoll, outside of dangers such as debris flow, substantial surface water run-off, ground stability, and/or avalanche conditions. Utility services are present at site and will require upgrades from existing conditions, requiring minimal if any off site disturbance. 8. Plan with existing and proposed grading, see Z 1-0 14 9. Proposed Elevations of the development, see Z1-015-017 10. Proposed construction techniques will include: cast in place concrete foundation, steel and concrete floor and wall structures, and traditional residential infill walls. 35. Exterior Lighting Plan, see Z1-012. Cut sheets are referenced in plan set pg Z1-013 8 ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application, and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. During the staff review stage, the application will be referred to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. A memo will be written by the staff member for signature by the Community Development Director. The memo will explain whether your application complies with the Code and will list any conditions which should apply if the application is to be approved. Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. 5. Board Review of Application. If a public hearing is required for the land use action that you are requesting, then the Planning Staff will schedule a hearing date for the application upon determination that the Application is complete. The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s). The Applicant will be required to mail notice (one copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department) of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date (please see Attachment 6 for instructions). The 9 Planning Staff will publish notice of the hearing in the paper for land use requests that require publication. The Planning Staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the reviewing board(s). Staff will supply the Applicant with a copy of the Planning Staff's memo approximately 5 days prior to the hearing. The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boards. Public Hearings include a presentation by the Planning Staff, a presentation by the Applicant (optional), consideration of public comment, and the reviewing board's questions and decision. 6. Issuance of Development Order. If the land use review is approved, then the Planning Staff will issue a Development Order which allows the Applicant to proceed into Building Permit Application. 7. Receipt of Building*Permit. Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time,your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review(this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. 10 ATTACHMENT 6 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Three forms of notice are required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations: publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and mailing to surrounding landowners. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication - Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Community Development Department and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting - Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof to the hearing that posting took place (use attached affidavit). 3. Mailing - Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing that the mailing took place(use attached affidavit). Notice to mineral Estate Owner. An Applicant for surface Development shall notify affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application for development. The applicant shall certify that the notice has been provided to the mineral estate owners. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public hearing. 11 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 511 Lazy Chair Road , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 20 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I Steev Wilson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035,. Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 12 Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(,SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 13 Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative — meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner(e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. JaIlLiary, 2013 City of 14 ro: Millard Page 2 of 2 2014-07-08 23:24:09(G 18667705585 From: Christopher May • ECER&D JUL 2 5 2014 C�o62�Zo14 ,A�l-� COMMUNITY e Agreement to Pay Application s=ees Ana reement between the City of Aspen ('City")and Property Lazy Chair Lot 2, LLC Phone No.: 970-925-9009 Owner("I"): Email: millard so ris.net Address of 511 Lazy Chair Road Billing c/o Millard J. Zimet, P.C. Property: Aspen, CO 81611 Address: p 604 West Main Street (subject of application) (send bills here) Aspen, CO 81611 understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 5.975 flat fee for Parks S 0 flat fee for Select Dept S 0 flat fee for Select Dept S 0 flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. S 3,'250 deposit for 10 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$325 per hour. REC"EIVED S 265 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time.Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. JUL 2 5 2014 City of Aspen: Property owner: CITY OF ASPEN MCtMMi!N"D—MLOMNT Chris Bendon �/ Community Development Director Name:/)//, City Use: 4490 Title: fii� Fees Due:$ Received:$ 15 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Hillary Seminick DATE: May 29, 2014 PROJECT: 511 Lazy Chair Road Lot 2 REPRESENTATIVE: Steev Wilson, Forum Phi, LLC; 970.279.4109, swilson@forumphi.com REQUEST: 8040 Greenline Review DESCRIPTION: The owner is demolishing and replacing an existing single-family home at 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2. The property is zoned Rural Residential (RR). The lot was a part of the three-lot subdivision known as the Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Land Subdivision Exemption (Pfister Subdivision), which was approved by Pitkin County and subsequently annexed into the City of Aspen. The property was subject to a mix of County and City land use approvals. These Pitkin County entitlements are removed from the Pfister Subdivision on May 27, 2014 in Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2014 and will be effective June 26, 2014. Conditions of these approvals included a prohibition of development above 8060' above mean sea level because of the steep grade and natural vegetation in this portion of the parcel. An 8040 Greenline Review is reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The property is also subject to Residential Design Standards. Any variances from the standards may be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission concurrently with the 8040 Greenline Review. Please note that increasing floor area will trigger impact fees, including Parks, TDM/Air Quality, and School Lands Dedication fee in lieu, and that increasing square footage will trigger Affordable Housing Mitigation. The applicant should document the number of bedrooms and square footage of the house being demolished to ensure they get credit for the existing building when they proceed to building permit. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience.. Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20 use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/PIanning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.435.030.0 Environmentally Sensitive Areas — 8040 Greenline Exemption 26.470 Growth Management Quota Systems (GMQS) 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.600 Impact Fees and Dedications 26.710.130 Rural Residential (RR) Zone District 16 Review by: Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing: Yes, Planning and Zoning Commission Neighborhood Outreach: Not required. Planning Fees: $3,250 for 10 hours of Planning review. Any unbilled portion of this deposit will be refunded at the conclusion of the case. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $325 per hour. Referrals: $265 for one hour of Engineering review, $975 for one hour of Parks review. Total Deposit: $4,490 To apply, submit the following information: ❑ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. ❑ Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). ❑ Total deposit for review of the application. ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. ❑ HOA Compliance form (Attached) ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. ❑ Written responses to all review criteria. ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 17 ❑ 10 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. (list # of copies typically associated with PZ, HPC, and CC review, 1 per referral agency) ❑ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. ❑ A sketch up model will be required for the public hearing. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 18 Total Deposit for review of the application • � i I �' f � '� � _ � `��-'�� -��. '' rid '��73 '4c'6'`��a'r� 9�. 1 uII45�. 770 E M/W W wwtASPEN.COltltt -• :,, y �r ,.� ''C=��tir�, . .rmm.ro�.r,yn„ � • ��. r� �� 7 ��f.� IBM— m sz mss. 19 7/10/2014 Parcel Detail Tax Account Parcel 2013 Mill Area Number Number Property Type Levy 001j R016359 273511302002 RESIDENTIAL 32.843 Primary Owner Name and Address LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 0133 PROSPECTOR RD 94102B ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detafl Legal Description Subdivision:ARTHUR O PFISTER EXEMPTION Lot: 2 Location Physical Address: 511 LAZY CHAIR LN ASPEN ARTHUR O PFISTER Subdivision: EXEMPTION Land Acres: 112.400 Land Sq Ft: 0 2014 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 3,450,000 274,620 Improvements: F 265,800 21,160 Total: E-- , 3,715,8001 295,780 Sale Date: 2/28/2014 Sale Price: 2,500,000 20 http:/AmNw.piNnassessor.org/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountN umber=R016359 1/1 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: ��C. f' Millard J.Zimet,P.C. 604 W Main Street RECEPTION#: 608319, 02/28/2014 at Aspen,Colorado 81611 03:18:17 PM, 1 OF 2, R $16.00 DF $250.00 Doc Code PER REP DEED Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED (SALE) THIS DEED is dated February 28, 2014, and is made between Andrew V. Hecht, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased, "Grantor," and Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, "Grantee," whose address is c/o Aspen Starwood, LLC, 0133 Prospector Road, Suite 4102B, Aspen, CO 81611, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. N WHEREAS, Elizabeth H. Pfister died on the date of November 17, 2011 and the Grantor Cn was duly appointed Personal Representative of said estate by the District Court in and for the County of Pitkin, and State of Colorado, Probate No. 11PR60, on the date of November 28, 2011, and is now qualified and acting in said capacity. NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the powers conferred upon the Grantor by the Colorado 6 Probate Code, Grantor does hereby sell and convey unto Grantee, for and in consideration of Two Million Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($2,500,000.00), the following described real property situate in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado: .Lot 2, ARTHUR 0. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, according to the plat thereof recorded April 14, 1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45, as Reception No. 403369, Pitkin County, Colorado, also known by street address as: 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road,Aspen,CO 81611 and assessor's schedule or parcel number: 273511302002 With all appurtenances. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this Deed on the date set forth above. GRANTOR: The Estate of Elizabeth H.Pfister,deceased An ew 7,Techt,Personal Representative U17y OF ASPC d I �"METT PAO OfT �SP&E DATE h W.Z106'�� FI' PmD �� 1 bAT E ll� RP-r.O�' No. 17 a49 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisZ�Pday of February, 2014, by Andrew V.Hecht,Personal Representative of the Estate of Elizabeth A. Pfister,deceased. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: IV7 STACY STANEK NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID#20024032730 Notary ublic my COMMIsslon Eon October 7,2014 22 , Title Insurance Co mltment ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Commitment INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS The Title Insurance Commitment is a legal contract between you and the Company. It is issued to show the basis on which AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY 1 we will issue a Title Insurance Policy to you. The Policy will insure you against certain risks to the land title, subject to the CONDITIONS 2 limitations shown in the Policy, The Company will give you a sample of the Policy form, if you SCHEDULE A Insert ask. The Policy contains an arbitration clause.All arbitrable matters 1. Commitment Date when the Amount of Insurance Is $2,000,000 or less shall be. arbitrated at the option of either the Company or you as the exclusive remedy of the parties.You may review a copy of the 2. Policies to be Issued,Amounts . arbitration rules at htto:/Iwww.alta.org/. and Proposed Insureds The Commitment is based on the land title as of the Commitment Date.. Any changes in the land title or the 3. Interest in the Land and Owner transaction may affect the Commitment and the Policy._ The Commitment is subject to its Requirements, Exceptions 4. Description of the Land and Conditions. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PART OF THE TITLE SCHEDULE 8-1—REQUIREMENTS Insert INSURANCE COMMITMENT, YOU SHOULD READ THE COMMITMENT VERY CAREFULLY. SCHEDULE B-II—EXCEPTIONS Insert If you have any questions about the Commitment,contact: . FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 First American Way,Santa Ana,California 92707 AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY We agree to issue policy to you according to the terms of the Commitment. When we show the policy amount and your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A,this Commitment becomes effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A. If the Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, our obligation under this Commitment will end. Also,our obligation under this Commitment will end when the Policy is.issued and then our obligation'to you will be under the Policy. Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following: • The Provisions in Schedule A. • The Requirements in Schedule B-1. • The Exceptions in Schedule B-Il. • The Conditions on Page 2. This Commitment is not valid without SCHEDULE A and Sections I and II of SCHEDULE B. First American Title Insurance Company LE IksU��,1 0 rn SEPTEMBER 24, b , d 1968 411FUR011,*-:= Dennis J.Gilmore Timothy Kemp President Secretary I (This Commitment Is valid only when Schedules A and B are attached) This jacket was created electronically and constitutes an original document Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association.All rights reserved.The use of this form is restricted to ALTA Rcensees and ALTA members In good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited.Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. i Form 5011000(6-22-10) Page 1 of 2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment(6-17-06) f �( CONDITIONS � 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Mortgage" means mortgage, deed .of trust or .other security instrument. (b) "Public Records" means title records.that give constructive notice of matters affecting your title according to the state statutes where your land is located. 2. LATER DEFECTS The Exceptions in Schedule B — Section II may be amended'to show any defects, liens or encumbrances that appear for the first time in the public records or are created or attached between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Requirements (a) and (c) of Schedule B— Section I are met. We shall have no liability to you because of this amendment. 3. EXISTING DEFECTS If any defects, liens or encumbrances existing at Commitment Date-are not shown in Schedule B, we may amend Schedule B to show them. If we do amend Schedule B to show these defects, liens or encumbrances, we shall be liable to you according to- Paragraph 4 below unless you knew.of this information and did not tell us about it in writing. 4. LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY Our only obligation is to issue to you the Policy referred to in this Commitment, when you have met its Requirements. If we have any liability to you for any loss you incur because of an error in this Commitment, our liability will be limited to your actual loss caused by your relying on this Commitment when you acted in good faith to: Comply with the Requirements shown in Schedule B—Section I or Eliminate with our written consent any Exceptions shown in Schedule B—Section Il. We shall not be liable for more than the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A of this Commitment and our liability is subject to the terms of the Policy form to be issued to you. 5. CLAIMS MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT Any claim, whether or not based on negligence, which you may have against us concerning the title to the land must be based on this Commitment and is subject to its terms. t 24 Form 5011000(6-22-10) Page 2 of 2 ALTA Plain Language Commitment(6-17-06) American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 First American Title Insurance Co. Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: February 25, 2014 at 07:45 AM 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount Premium A. ALTA Own. Policy (06/17/06) $ 2,500,000.00 $ 3,427.00 Proposed Insured: Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Certificate of Taxes Due $ 25.00 Endorsements: Form 110.1 (Delete 1, 2, 3, 4) $ 75.00 Additional Charges: $ 0.00 Total $ 3,527.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee Simple. 4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased 5. The land referred to in the Commitment is described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT AATTACHED HERETO For informational purposes only, the property address is: 511 Lazy Chair Ranch Road,Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen By: Authorized Officer or Agent FOR INFORMATION OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT: Winter T. Van Alstine, 715 W. Main Street, Suite 305,Aspen, Colorado 81611, Phone:: (970) 925-7328, Fax: (970) 925-7348. THIS COMMITMENT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE STATEMENT OF TERMS, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS ATTACHED. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. � AMERICAN The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members In good standing as of the date of use. LAND TITLE All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ASSOCIATION (14003208.PF D/14003208/57) 25 • American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 FirstAmerican Title Insurance Co. Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B 1. Requirements: 1. Pay the.agreed amounts for the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured. 2. Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. 3. Documents satisfactory to us creating the interest in the land and/or the mortgage to be insured must be signed, delivered and recorded. 4. You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. 5. Payment of all taxes, charges and assessments, levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due and payable. 6. A Certification of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or an authorized agent(pursuant to Senate Bill 92-143, CRS 10-11-122). 7. Receipt by the Company of the appropriate affidavit as to new construction and indemnifying the Company against any unfiled materialmen's or mechanic's liens. 8. Personal Representative's Deed from the Personal Representative of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased, to Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. 9. Certified Letters of Appointment for the Estate of Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased, evidencing the appointment of the Personal Representative for the estate. NOTE: The Letters must be from a Court within the State of Colorado, if the Estate is open in another state; an Ancillary Estate must be opened in Colorado. 10. Release of the Deed of Trust from Elizabeth H. Pfister, survivor of herself and Arthur O. Pfister to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of$1,500,000.00, and any other amounts and/obligations secured thereby, dated September 20, 2011, and recorded October 7, 2011, as Reception No. 583381. 11. Evidence satisfactory to the company that the estate of Elizabeth H. Pfister, deceased, is not subject to the Federal Estate Tax. 12. Certificate of Good Standing from the Colorado Secretary of State for Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. AMERICAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTAmembers ASSOCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. n (14003208.PF D/14003208/58) 26 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 13. Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172. 14. Acopy of the properly signed and executed Operating Agreement if written, for Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,'to be submitted to the Company for review. 15. Improvement Survey Plat sufficient in form, content and certification acceptable to the Company. Exception will be taken to adverse matters disclosed thereby. 16. A good and sufficient access easement for access to Lot 2 across Lot 3. 17. This Title Commitment is subject to underwriter approval. 2. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records, but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records, 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the Land would disclose, and which are not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown in the Public Records. 5. Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 7. Taxes for the year 2013, and taxes for 2014, not yet due or payable. 8. Rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights and right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises as reserved in the United States Patent dated April 3, 1896, and recorded August 26, 1911, in Book 55 at Page 191, as Reception No. 074888. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. AME M CAN LAND TTTLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members ASSOCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. n (14003208.PFD/14003208/58) 27 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed dated November 7, 1950, and recorded November 15, 1950, in Book 176 at page 79, as Reception No. 097937, and Correction Deed dated November 7, 1958, and recorded November 10, 1958, in Book 185 at Page 486, as Reception No. 107215, and in Book 242 at Page 369A. 10. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded plat recorded May 18, 1951, in Plat Book 2A at Page 146, as Reception No. 098360. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated May 10, 1951, and recorded June 1, 1951, in Book 175 at Page 513 as Reception No. 098386, and Quit Claim Deed dated December 19, 1969, and recorded December 19, 1969, in Book 245 at Page 114, as Reception No. 138379, and Agreement dated December 19, 1969, and recorded December 19, 1969, in Book 245 at Page 116, as Reception No. 138380, and re-recorded August 25, 1972, in Book 266 at Page 253, as Reception No. 153537. 12. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Lease dated May 1, 1967, and recorded February 10, 1970, in Book 246 at Page 711, as Reception No. 139294, and Amendment to Lease dated November 27, 1969, in Book 246 at Page 728, as Reception No. 139295. 13. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement dated November 27, 1969, and recorded February 10, 1970, in Book 246 at Page 740, as Reception No. 139296. 14. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement dated November 27, 1969, and recorded February 10, 1970, in Book 246 at Page 746, as Reception No. 139297, and Deed of Easement dated November 28, 1969, in Book 246 at Page 752, as Reception No. 139298. 15. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement dated February 2, 1970, and recorded March 18, 1970, in Book 247 at Page 424, as Reception No. 139727. 16. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Grant of Easement dated October 27, 1977, and recorded November 15, 1977, in Book 338 at Page 694, as Reception No. 199364. 17. Terms, conditions,.provisions,-agreements and obligations specified under the Second Amendment to Lease dated November 14, 1977, and recorded November 18, 1977, in Book 338 at Page 994, as Reception No. 199510. 18. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated August 8, 1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 614, as Reception No. 243705. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. AMERICAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members AMCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. n (14003208.PFD/14003208/58) 28 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 19. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Lease Agreement dated August 16, 1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 627, as Reception No. 243707. 20. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Lease Agreement dated August 16, 1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 628, as Reception No. 243708. 21. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated August 8, 1982, and recorded August 25, 1982, in Book 431 at Page 617, as Reception No. 243706, and Amended Agreement dated January 15, 1984, and recorded February 3, 1984, in Book 460 at Page 373, as Reception No. 257066. 22. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Tiehack Water Tank Site Platting Exemption Plat, recorded September 17, 1982, in Plat Book 13 at Page 88, as Reception No. 244234, and the Tiehack Water Tank Site Platting Exemption Plat dated June 6, 1983, and recorded June 10, 1983, in Plat Book 15 at Page 5, as Reception No. 250827. 23. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated January 5, 1984, and recorded January 6, 1984, in Book 458 at Page 752, as Reception No. 256282. 24. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Tax Free Exchange Agreement dated December 6, 1983, and recorded February 3, 1984, in Book 460 at Page 366, as Reception No. 257065. 25. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated December 6, 1983, and recorded February 3, 1984, in Book 460 at Page 384, as Reception No. 257067. 26. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated January 19, 1984, and recorded February 6, 1984, in Book 460 at Page 573, as Reception No. 257132. 27. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated March 31, 1984, and recorded April 11., 1984, in Book 464 at Page 421, as Reception No. 258682, and Clarification Deed dated September 12, 1988, and recorded February 17, 1989, in Book 586 at Page 147, as Reception No. 308906. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Tit Is Association. All rights reserved. AMERICAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members ASSOCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. n (14003208.P F D/14003208/58) 29 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Forth Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 28. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, Granting Approval of Detailed Submission for Subdivision, 1041 Environmental Hazard Review, Scenic Foreground Overlay Review, Planned Unit Development, Rezoning, Special Review Approval for Relocation of the KSNO Radio Tower, Lot Line Adjustment with the ARU Property, General and Detailed Submission to the "Grand Amendment" portion of the Application and Amendment to the Buttermilk Ski Area Master Plan for the Pfister Ranch/Golf Application (Resolution No. 91-;111) dated June 11, 1991, and recorded September 23, 1991, in Book 657 at Page 306, as Reception No. 336728, and Amendment to Resolution No. 91-111 of the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, Granting Approval of Detailed Submission for Subdivision, 1041 Environmental Hazard Review, Scenic Foreground Overlay Review, Planned Unit Development, Rezoning, Special Review Approval for Relocation of the KSNO Radio Tower, Lot Line Adjustment with the ARU Property, General and Detailed Submission to the"Grand Amendment" portion of the Application and Amendment to the Buttermilk Ski Area Master Plan for the Pfister Ranch /Golf Application (Resolution No. 91-112) dated August 7, 1991, and recorded September 23, 1991, in Book 657 at Page 384, as Reception No. 336729. 29.. Terms,conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Dedication Agreement for Roads dated August 13, 1993, and recorded November 12, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 662, as Reception No. 363240. 30. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Access Easement Agreement dated September 8, 1993, and recorded November 12, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 774, as Reception No. 363255. 31. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Special Warranty Deed dated November 12, 1993, and recorded November 12, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 747, as Reception No. 363250. 32. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Special Warranty Deed dated November 12, 1993, and recorded November 12, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 793, as Reception No. 363257. 33. 30 foot wide Access Easement as reflected on the.St. Luke's Community Health Resources, Inc. Lot Line Adjustment Plat recorded November 12, 1993, in Plat Book 33 at Page 3, as Reception No. 363254 and the Final Subdivision Plat& PUD for Maroon Creek Club recorded November 15, 1993, in Plat Book 33 at Page 4, as Reception No. 363275. 34. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Water Service Agreement dated July 26, 1993, and recorded November 15, 1993, in Book 730 at Page 797, as Reception No. 363258, and First Amendment to Water Service Agreement dated July 26, 1993, and recorded October 17, 1997, as Reception No. 409559. 35. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Access Easement Agreement dated November 19, 1993, and recorded December 2, 1993, in Book 733 at Page 590, as Reception No. 364074. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. � AM E IU CAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members ASSOCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. n (14003208.PF D/14003208/58) 30 American Land Title Association ALTA Commitment Form Adopted 6-17-06 Commitment Number: 14003208 SCHEDULE B (Continued) 36. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Golf Course Easement Agreement dated December 8, 1993, and recorded December 15 1993, in Book 735 at Page 400, as Reception 364622. 37. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants dated December 10, 1993, and recorded December 22, 1993, in Book 736 at Page 335, as Reception No. 364890. 38. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, Granting.Approval for Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption, Essential Community Facilities.Subdivision Exemption, Special Review, 1041 Environmental Hazard Review and Scenic Foreground Overlay and General Submission Review for the Pfister Property (Resolution No. 94-239) dated December 20, 1994, and recorded March 2, 1995, in Book 775 at Page 282, as Reception No. 379407. 39. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded plat of Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption Plat recorded April 14, 1997, in Plat book 42 at Page 45, a Reception No. 403369, and Consent and Ratification of Plat dated May 30, 2008, and recorded June 16, 2008, as Reception No. 550278. 40. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado,Approving the Annexation of Certain Territory to the City of Aspen, Colorado, to be known and Designated as the "Maroon Creek Club Subdivision (South) Property"Annexation (Ordinance No. 34 (Series of 1996), dated August 26, 1996, and recorded February 21, 1997, as Reception No. 401985. 41. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance of the Aspen City Council Granting a Rezoning for the Maroon Creek Subdivision in Conjunction with Annexation Into the City of Aspen, dated October 28, 1996, and recorded April 8, 1997, as Reception No. 403224. 42. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Maroon Creek Club Subdivision (South)Annexation Plat recorded February 6, 1997, in Plat Book 41 at Page 76, as Reception No. 401571. 43. Intentionally deleted. 44. Encroachment of Golf Tee and septic lids onto subject property as reflected on the Improvement .Survey Plat provided by Tuttle Surveying Services dated July 18, 2012. 45. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Easement Deed dated February 2014, and recorded February , 2014, as Reception No. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. AMERICAN LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members ASSOCIATION in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. N (14003208.PF D/14003208/84) 31 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT- Pursuant to C.R.S. 30-10-406(3)(a) all documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will refuse to record or file any document that does not conform to the requirements of this section. NOTE: If this transaction includes a sale of the property and the price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply Wbthe-disclosuretwithholding provisions of C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (Nonresident withholding). NOTE Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1 requires that "Every He entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the He entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction*which was closed." Provided that First American Title Insurance Companyconducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents. from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders .Policy when issued. Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, the company will not issue its policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this commitment until it has been-provided'a Certificate of Taxes due or other equivalent documentation from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent or until the Proposed Insured has notified or instructed the company in writing to the contrary. The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. 'A Certificate of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer.or.the County Treasurer's authorized agent Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. -NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 14-11-123, notice is hereby given: ' This notice applies to owner's poiicy commitm�nts_crxntaininc�a ine�l seuerat�se-instr .,e eeptiaof exceptions, in Schedule S,Section•2.. A. That there is recorded evidence that.a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest: iti oil,•gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and S. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. NOTE: .Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3�-1, Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon.compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of_this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must -receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un�flled mechanic`s and materiakmen's.fens.- Q. The'Company must receive.payment of the appropriate premium. E. if there has been construction, improvements or major repairs. undertaken on•the property to be purchased within six months prior.to the Date of the Comimitment, the requirements to obtain coverage' for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure-of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium, fulfy executed indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may -be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be*given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for . or agreed to pay, First American Title insurNx Company NOTE; Pursuant to C.R.S. 38-30* , person or entity that provides closing '-__gement services for a real estate transaction shall disburse funds as a part of such services until those funds have been received and are available for immediate withdrawal as a matter of right NOTE: C.R.S, 33-14-102 requires that a real property transfer declaration accompany-any conveyance document presented for recordation in the State of Colorado. Said declaration shall.be completed and-signed by either the grantor or grantee; NOTE; Pursuant to CRS 1 D-1-12$(6)(a), it is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for'the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. . Penalties_ may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance aiid civil damages. Any insurance company .or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete; or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for-the purpose of defrauding or attempting to-defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. Nothing herein contained will be deemed toobligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. FiirstAmerican'MeInsurance Company . 33 i FirstAmerican Title Insurance Co. Commitment Number: 14003208 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: Lot 2,ARTHUR O. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, according to the plat thereof recorded April 14, 1993 in Plat Book 42 at Page 45, as Reception No. 403369, Pitkin County, Colorado. ALTA Commitment Exhibit A (14003208.PFD/14003208/19) 34 ATS`® E;YS `1!'I"L.1= INSURANCE AGENcy OF As1EN, LLC . . 715 WEsT MAIxSTREET, S UTE 305 ASP-EN, Cot..oR.aDo 8 i 6 i 1 ATTORAr=T=i' VSZJR"CFAG VCFOFA, ;PW,.LLC Privacy P olicy Notice PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE Title V-of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or-through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you Witha nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy.policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GL&4, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Afton: ys ntle.Inan=e Agency afAspen,LLC Vire may coIlect nonpublic personal information"about you from the following sakes: • Information we recam from you, such as on applications or other forms.• . • Information about your transactions we secure from our f les, or from our affiliates or others. • Information we receive from a consumer ter reporting agency. • .Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no .additional nonpublic personal information wM be collected about:you. . Vire maydisclose any of the above information that we collect about our.r castom.ers or former customers to.our afQiates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. Vire also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the€oIlowing types of noriaf Mated companies that perform marketing sen ices on our behalf ai with wham we have joint marketing agreements: Financial service providers such as companies en,,-,aged in bank, consumer finance, securities and insurance. o Non-financial companies such .as envelope staffers and other fulfillment .serPice providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABITH OUT YOU W ANYONE.FOP,ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT.SPECIF G r,r,Y PFR Nrrrr�n BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to.provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, ' electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information: - i T"LEPriomE 970 925-7328 d A',& Fkcsn+tir=970 925.7348 35 CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC c/o Millard J.Zimet, P.C. 604 West Main Street Aspen,CO 81611 3/3/14 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street,3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 Lot 2 Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Director, This letter shall serve as my approval for Forum Phi Architecture to submit, represent and obtain materials on the behalf of the owner of Lot 2 of the Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision. Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC hereby authorizes Steev Wilson and Forum Phi to perform and submit documents related to planning, Building Permit Application, or to gain building file information on our behalf for the project located at Lot 2 Arthur O. Pfister Subdivision Aspen, CO 81611. They may represent us during the application review and approval processes. They may act on our behalf, may sign on our behalf all applications and permits, and any documents required or ancillary thereto. Steev Wilson, Partner,AIA Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Ste 204 Aspen, CO 81611 Sincerely, -- � 62 3 �, Date G 2- Print Name 36 DMMUNItYbEVtLd0MENT' • . • Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Name: Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC Owner("I"): Email: millard@sopris.net Phone No.: 970-925-9009 Address 511 L Property:y: aze Chair Rd,Aspen,CO S 1611 (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) ❑ This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. El This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: date: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: / date: J 1% 2 v Attorney printed name: I"n� �� 37 �4 WI LLIAM CLINTON ,L ;U K E S _ A R C H 'I'-'T- E.,� C T Monday, June 30, 2014 Steev Wilson Forum Phi Architects 715 West Main Street, Suite 20 Aspen, Colorado 81611 sent via email re: Maroon Creek Club, Pfister Subdivision Lot 2 Site and Architecture Review Committee Approvals Steev: This will confirm that the Site and Architecture Review Committee of the Maroon Creek Club Master Association, by a vote of the Committee members present at the June 26, 2014 meeting, granted the following approval: Schematic Plan Architectural Approval for Pfister Subdivision Lot 2 as provided by the Maroon Creek Club Design Guidelines based on plans received 6/5/2014 and 6/26/2014. This is a preliminary approval. Approval to proceed with any construction or work on site was not included in the approval granted. By the vote of the Committee members present, this approval is subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions of Approval: 1. No variances from the Maroon Creek Club Design Guidelines are given or implied by this approval, except as specifically identified herein. 2. At the time of application for Final [Construction Document] Review, the owner must have; a. Signed and returned the Maroon Creek Club Master Association Compliance and Construction Completion Guaranty. This document can be downloaded from the Maroon Creek Club web page at www.williamlukes.com . b. Provided a Letter of Credit or equivalent financial security in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars[$100,000.00]provided in a form and from a source as is acceptable to the Association,all as provided in the Maroon Creek Club Master Association Compliance and Construction Completion Guaranty. The approved language and form for a letter of THE LAKESIDE STUDIO 801 LAKESIDE DRIVE CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623-3109 PHONE 970 963 8025 WWW.WILLIAMLUKES.COM 38 credit is aOable at www.williamlukes.com. • C. The Road Impact Fee has been determined by MCC to not apply to Lots 2 and 3 of the Pfister Subdivision by virtue of language included in the Protective Covenants for both subdivisions. 3. Prior to the start of any construction on site, the owner must have completed the following: a. Signed and returned the Agreement Regarding Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans which provides that the owner agrees to immediately cease all construction activity on the site upon written notice from the Association if the Site and Architecture Review Committee has not approved a final landscape plan. Such notice may be sent at any time after a date forty-five (45) calendar days after the date of Final (construction document) Architectural Approval. The owner must further stipulate that construction activity will not resume until a final landscape plan is approved by SARC. This document is required only if final landscape and grading approval is not received at the same time as final architectural approval. This document is available at www.williamiukes.com . Specific Conditions of Approval: 1. Additional items required to be submitted to SARC for review and approval; a. All items required in the Design Guidelines for final review, b. Final samples of materials and colors for all exterior materials and driveway. C. Letters from MCC Golf and the owner(s) of the adjacent Pfister Lot 2 confirming their approval for any drawings and plans to be submitted to SARC. 2. A site inspection will be arranged by Andy Hecht and will include the architect, the Architectural Advisor,and David Chadbourne or other representatives of MCC Golf to review landscape plans, visibility of the home from the golf course, materials and colors, access and traffic,and new trees and irrigation responsibilities. 3. Drawings for final review must address the following; a. A landscape plan will be submitted that includes the following; i. A gap between existing stands of oaks, between the house and the 8"' hole fairway/tee areas, is to be filled with trees and other landscaping as approved by MCC Golf and SARC,to effect screening of the house and pool areas from the golf course. ii. The landscape plan for this area should include a layering of plant materials including shrubbery and/or other plants that are lower in height than trees so that the under-story area is also fully screened,and so that the appearance from the golf course is natural looking and compatible with other landscaping around the golf course and along this hillside. iii. Maintenance responsibilities, including the installation and maintenance / operation of irrigation for these screening trees,are to be worked out between the applicant and MCC Golf, and clearly shown on the documents submitted to SARC. iv. All existing stands of oaks and other vegetation between the house and the golf course are to be protected during construction by approved fencing and may not be removed or altered without SARC approval. V. Additional tall trees may be required in order to mitigate the visibility of the house from the golf course and prevent undesirable reflections from larger areas of glass. b. While SARC is not opposed to granting a number of variances for this home,primarily with respect to architectural design and elements,the roofing materials and all materials toward the upper parts of the house that may be visible from the golf course should comply with the Design Guidelines, and all exterior material colors should be respectful of those Design Guidelines. THE LAKESIDE STUDIO 801 LAKESIDE DRIVE CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623-3109 PHONE 970 963 8025 WWW.WILLIAMLUKES.COM 39 C. Location and use of any outdoor speakers must not create a nuisance for golfers on the nearby holes and paths of travel. 4. The schematic approval includes tentative variances for the following items as shown on the drawings, subject to Final Approval by the SARC; a. The extent of variances from the Design Guidelines that would be required to approve the massing, proposed exterior materials, and general design of this home would be numerous, but in recognition of the facts that 1) the home is not generally visible from other homes and roads within MCC,2)the design of the home will primarily affect only the golf course and the adjacent Pfister Lot 3, and 3) this property is not within the actual boundaries of MCC,SARC is not opposed to including several variances in a subsequent final approval if the owner of the adjacent Lot 3 and MCC Golf have no objection to the design. 5. No construction,staging,or access will be allowed within the MCC Golf Easement area without the prior written consent of MCC Golf. This area must be completely fenced during construction. 6. Temporary screening by means of fencing with "opaque" fabric or other privacy measures are generally required for construction sites that are immediately adjacent to golf play areas at MCC. It is likely that such measures will be required during the construction phase for this home, but the extent has not been determined. Construction fencing will be required to be placed,and approved by the Architectural Advisor, prior to any work on site. 7. Drawings submitted for final review will spell out construction management measures proposed to ensure safety as well as to prevent damage and unsightly conditions for the portions of Lazy Chair Road that have shared use with MCC Golf, especially from May through October. A project schedule will be submitted so that MCC Golf can evaluate the impact of construction on golf course operations during the next few years. 8. No air conditioning equipment was included in the review or approval. 9. No exterior lighting was included in the review or approval. 10. No masonry samples were included in the review or approval, the review was limited to areas that will be masonry. IMPORTANT NOTES: Construction that is either not in full accordance with the approved documents or that has not been approved in advance will result in substantial fines being levied against the property owner. Funds used to secure the Construction and Completion Guaranty may be collected by the Master Association to pay any fines that are assessed. Approval by the Site and Architecture Committee of the Maroon Creek Club Master Association does not constitute an assurance that the design of the project or the application complies with all applicable provisions of the County approvals for the Maroon Creek Club or that a building permit will be issued. It is the owner's responsibility to obtain building and other permits as may be required by the City of Aspen. THE LAKESIDE STUDIO 801 LAKESIDE DRIVE CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623-3109 PHONE 970 963 8025 WWW.WILLIAMLUKES.COM 40 Please let me know if you A any questions regarding the Committee's Son, or if we can be of any further assistance. We will send you separately one set of the approved plans for the owner's records. Cordially, THE LAKESIDE STUDIO for the Maroon Creek Club Master Association William Lukes,Architect Architectural Advisor to SARC copies: All SARC members Sarah Korpela, Joshua & Co. Association Management Hal Dishler Association Counsel David Chadbourne MCC General Manager THE LAKESIDE STUDIO 801 LAKESIDE DRIVE CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623-3109 PHONE 970 963 8025 WWW.WILLIAMLUKES.COM 41 511 Lazy Chair Lot: 2— 8040 Greenline Review Criteria Response Sec. 26.435.030 City of Aspen Land Use Code C. 8040 Greenline review standards. No development shall be permitted at, above or one hundred fifty(150) feet below the 8040 Greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. Per City of Aspen Pre-Application Conference Summary, Lazy Chair Lot 2: "Conditions of these approvals included a prohibition of development above 8060' above mean sea level because of the steep grade and natural vegetation in this portion of of the parcel." Also, according to the First Amendment Final Plat: "development in the hatched area above elevtaion 8060 is prohibited except as reasonably necessary for utility infrastructure, storm water mitigation, maintenance or restoration of native landscape, and wildfire mitigation needs:" 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the X "11's possibility of mudflow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain xE PCS hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and re-vegetate the soils or, where x ii NATA"S necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the City. POILT See Civil, 6/6. The geotechnical reports will address the suitability of the site for the proposed residence. The civil application includes an erosion control plan to re vegetate and stabilize the cut slopes post final grading. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects of water pollution. See Civil, 2/6. Runoff from impervious surfaces will be retained and infiltrated onsite. Over flows from retention facilities will be sized to release at the historical undeveloped flow rate as per the URMP rules. Rip Rap and vegetation will be used in swales to dissipate energy leaving the site to negate any downstream effects. The City of Aspen's Water Quality Capture Volume and Flood Detention Volume requirements can be met with the proposed site design. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the City. Hand Sweeping with brooms and shovels, and daily visual checks and removal of debris along the Project entry areas, the intersection of the driveway at Lazy Chair Road will be washed clean as needed. During Excavation, site watering will be performed by automatic sprinkler system as required to control dust. Additional site watering will be performed as necessary to limit air borne dust.As per City of Aspen Construction Management Plan Requirements Manual dated August 2010, no diesel engine emissions will exceed 40% opacity, except for starting or stationary operation not exceeding 10 seconds. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. See Civil, 3/6. A large portion of the structure is below grade. Offsite flows from above will be 42 r routed around the structure before returning to their natural drainage pattern. There are no trials within the development area and the existing access off Tiehack Road will be used. There is a 30'access easement and there is no plan to go outside of this. 5.Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. See Civil grading plan. Soil nail walls are proposed for shoring to minimize the disturbance to the site. Grading is not to extend above the 8060'contour elevation. The only exception to the disturbance area elevation is for utility connections. No grading is proposed within the Maroon Creek Golf Course Easements. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. There is only one structure situated near the center of the property. The access already exists and there is no request to for a second access. The road entering the site follows the natural terrain minimizing the need to for excessive cuts/fills. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. See Z 1-013 thru Z 1-015. The proposed structure is under maximum allowable height limit. Areas of roof and exterior walls will be vegetated roof and/or partially/fully below grade. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. See Civil, 4/6. Currently there is a 2 million gallon City of Aspen owned potable water tank above the property to the west. The top of tank is at elevation of 8121', the upper finished floor of the house is proposed to be 8051.5'. The tank is 38'tall hence the bottom/outfall of the tank is estimated to be 8083'. This would indicate there is 31.5'of static head at the upper level of the house which is approximately 13.5 psi of static head. A booster pump may be required for the upper floors depending on flows.A Fire pump will be needed for the sprinkler system. In addition there is a hydrant located on site that will be moved closer to the driveway. Electrical service is from the west, sewer will be discharged to the manhole on the northeast. All other shallow utilities are proposed to be under the road entering the mechanical room 9.Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development and said roads can be properly maintained. See Civil, 3/6 & 5/6. The driveway connects to an existing access, Lazy Chair Road, which interested Tiehack Road. The applicant will plow the access in the winter and there is room on the downhill side of the road for snow storage. 10.Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. See Civil, 5/6. The onsite driveway is proposed to be 16'wide with inside turn radiuses of 29' and "Y" style turn around that is also 16'wide.Auto turn simulation was performed to demonstrate the 43 turning movement for a fire truck. Grades don't exceed 8% within the site driveways and turn rounds. 11. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. This development dose not impact he open space plan. No disturbance will occur within the MCC easement to the east of the property without their prior approval. This would only include plantings to further screen views of the development from the golf course as directed by the MCC. 44 511 Lazy Chair Dr, Lots 2 & 30 Vicinity Map M • Forum Phi Lazy Chair Lot 2 LLC 715 W. Main St., Suite 204 Lazy Chair Lot 3 LLC Aspen, CO 81611 604 W. Main St Aspen, CO 81611 ` STAGE RD r r— •r- .,NNS,. •f� �rte- w � I � • U � ' $ .D'Dw CV • 1 k �14 AW l �— _ — —fes �+ VN VIEW DR: , • � �., '�•�� rd`s 0. f-qy.L, fq ' • i ZY .* II 'i 2735310S RtB5VV - . } SITE a • '. • ' I'.NaUb 8 Panel Cash&Creek,• AROON CREEK Ra f TfiRk r 77 + • I r{�1 �` P` di X CN _1 V I r �' '••.r �7•. E o I , •a. LA � RK�PU R LN 1 ti•� i + 0 :; • t 0 � 32 10tt 511 Lazy Chair—Adjacent Properties within 300 feet of Arthor O Pfister Exemption Lots 2 & 3 Author O Pfister Exemption Lot 1: ID#: 273511302801 City of Aspen Attn Finance Dept 130 S Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 48: ID#: 273511309048 120 Pfeifer Place Bravura LLC 533 E Hopkins 3'Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 47: ID#: 273511309047 110 Pfeifer Place Bravura LLC 533 E Hopkins 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Lot A-D ID#: 273511209053 Maroon Creek LLC 10 Club Circle Aspen, CO 81611 Section: 11 Township: 10 Range: 85 Parcel of land in NE4SW4 of SEC 11-10-85 DESC BY M/B ID#: 273511300004 Kathryn A Finley 550 Lazy Chair Ranch Road Aspen, CO 81611 603 Maroon Creek Road ID#: 273511300005 S&J Investments II LLC 222 N Lasalle #800 Chicago, IL 60601 Lots H,J,K,L,M,N,P,Q,R,S & Roads ID#: 273511209055 Maroon Creek Club Master Association C/O Joshua and CO 300 S Hunter St Aspen, CO 81611 Lot 46: ID#: 273511309046 100 Pfeifer Place Crossgates LLC 533 E Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 46 - CTILITHOMPSON SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD LOT 2 ASPEN, COLORADO Prepared For: FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, CO 51611 Attention: Mr. Dustin Anderson, AIA Project No. G0 -120 Revised July 18, 2014 s i TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE----------------------------------------------- 1 SITECONDITIONS ----- ........... ...... ...... ....... ........... --................... ................. —......' 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCT|0N—.................... ----------- ....... .......... ............----_2 SUBSURFACE COWD0ONS ...___....___....... -----................. — ......... --------3 SLOPE STABILITY............. --- ......... ------ ...... —......----------------'4 EARTHWORK...----......... ............. -------- ................................. — ....... 5 Excavations------------------............ ....... --------....... .....—.............5 Excavation Retenbon— ... ...... .............. --...... ...... ---------------................. 'O Construction Dewatering.............. .......-- ........------...... .......... -----------'6 Percolation TaotinQ—.... ---- ................... .................... ... ... ... — ................ ....... — ....... 7 FOUNDATION .... ............ ......----------....... .......— ............ ---------......—... 7 FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-OW-GRADE--- ..... — .....____......--------............ ....8 Structurally Supported Floors.........---........... ................. ............. ...........___......... ....—' 1O BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCT|(}N-----................... --------- .............—............. 1l SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE..... — ........... ......— ......... — ............ ............ ....... -- ...... ..... ' 12 FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL COMPACTION.......... —..... —............. ... ---- ............... 13 EARTH RETAINING VVALLS— .......... ..... — ..........--.... ...... --......... ...........— .......— ....— 14 SURFACEDRAINAGE......-- ... ........ ....... ..............--...... ............ --------- .......... 15 CONCRETE ... — ....... ......... ........___........... -------------- ............ ........ _ 15 ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION, CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS AND MONITORING _...� 16 GEOTECHNICAL RISK—......___...___.........--- ____...... .........--------- ....... —' 17 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ........ ---- ............... — ....... — ........ ........ ...... —...... ....... ---' 17 UW1[TAT(ONS— ... ... ..........---- ...... ........... ........— .................... ---............. —...... 18 FIGURE 1 —VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2—LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURES 3AND 4—SUMMARY LOGS OFEXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 5—PROPOSED BUILDING LOCATION AND BORING 'LOCATIONS FIGURE S—SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURES 7AND 8—GRADATION TEST RESULTS � � FIGURES 9AND 1O— EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAINS FIGURE 11 —TYPICAL EARTH RETAINING WALL DRAIN TABLE | —SUMMARY OFLABORATORY TESTING EXHIBIT A—SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS EXHIBIT B—SURFACE DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION AND MAINTENANCE FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT u PROJECT NO,amosew*',o^REVISED sAGs05849^00I`20w.pvp"^s`GS05849120meey*°m*= SCOPE This report presents results of our geotechnical investigation for the planned residence at 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2 in Aspen, Colorado: We con- ducted this investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for the proposed residence. Our re- port was prepared from data developed during field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and experience with similar conditions. The report includes a description of the subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings, and geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction of the foundations, floor systems, below-grade walls, drain systems and for details influ- enced by the subsoils. The scope of services was described in a Service Agree- ment GS 14-0126, dated March 12, 2014 and agreement GS-14-170, dated June 3, 2014, SITE CONDITIONS The property is located at the terminus of Lazy Chair Road in Aspen, Colo- rado. A vicinity map is shown on Figure 1 and a plan view of existing conditions on the lot is shown on Figure 2. An existing two-story residence is on the lot. An approximately 6 foot high retaining wall is south of the garage. The average ground surface slope is +/- 20 percent toward the east-northeast in the existing building area. Areas of slopes above the existing residence and adjacent area are generally between 20 to 30 percent. Vegetation on the lot consists of sparse weeds and grasses, brush and irrigated landscaping, FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED S:,.GS05549,0001120t2,RepanskGS05849 120 R1 Revised.doc zs vv ma�v� AN 'I'll low y a t k / Existing Site Conditions PROPOSE® CONSTRUCTION The existing residence on the lot will be deconstructed. The proposed resi- dence will be two stories tail above-grade and two stories below-grade. A crawl space will be below the lowest floor level in some areas. We believe an approxi- mately 45 foot excavation into the existing hillside will be required at the southwest corner of the proposed residence. The basement level floor is planned at eleva- tion 8026 feet, The sub-basement level floor is planned at elevation 8018 feet. An approximately 4 foot crawl space/mechanical area is planned below the sub- basement level (elevation 8014). A garage will be on the main level of the resi- dence and will be accessed from Lazy Chair Road. Several retaining walls are planned around the residence. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849.120 REVISED SAGS05849.000112012,Repor1WG805849 120 Rt Revlsed,doc: SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions were investigated by drilling four exploratory borings {TH-1 through TH-4} at the approximate locations shown on Figures 2 and 5. Ex- ploratory borings TH-1 and TH-2 for this investigation were drilled on April 24, 2014 with 4-inch diameter, continuous-flight solid-stem auger and a track-mounted drill rig. Exploratory borings TH-3 and TH-4 were drilled on June 25 and 26, 2014 with an air rotary percussion system and an all terrain vehicle drill rig. Exploratory drilling was directed by our project engineer or principal engineer who logged the soils and bedrock encountered in the borings and obtained samples. Graphic logs of the soils and bedrock encountered in our exploratory borings are shown on Fig- ures 3 and 4. Our borings penetrated about 1 foot of organic sandy clay "topsoil", nil to 13 feet of sandy clay with occasional gravels and 14.5 to 29 feet of clayey to silty gravel with cobbles and boulders underlain by bedrock to the maximum drilled depth of 60 feet below the existing ground surface. Free ground water was en- countered at depths of 23.5 and 29 feet in our exploratory borings TH-1 and TH- on the day of drilling. Observations during drilling and results of penetration re- sistance tests indicated the clay was medium stiff to stiff and the gravel was dense to very dense. The shale bedrock was very hard. Borings TH-1, TH-3 and TH-4 were piped to facilitate future measurements of ground water. Our experience is that water flows, much of the year, on top of the bedrock. It is common to find ar- eas of perched water and isolated areas of high groundwater in excavations made in spring and early summer in the vicinity of the property. The soils above the bedrock included large gravel and cobbles. Meaningful samples for laboratory testing could not be obtained from the exploratory borings. The sampler used to obtain soil samples has a tip with a 1.5 inch diameter open- FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED S:IGS05849.00011201,2.RoporlsIGS05849 120 R1 Revissd.dae ing. Rocks with diameters larger than 1.5 inches are not retrieved. Therefore, Ia- boratory testing only reflects the matrix soils and smaller diameter rocks. Samples representative of the actual in-situ soils could not be practically obtained. We performed gradation testing on four soils samples. The soils contained 13 to 37 percent gravels, 26 to 46 percent sand and 26 to 45 percent silt and clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). A sample of the clay was selected for one dimensional swell-consolidation testing. The sample was wetted under an applied load of 1,000 psf and the resulting volume change measured. The sam- ple exhibited 0.1 percent consolidation when wetted. Swell-consolidation test re- sults are shown on Figure 6. Gradation test results are shown on Figures 7 and 8. Laboratory test results are summarized on Table I. SLOPE STABILITY We performed a preliminary slope stability analysis to understand earth re- tention requirements to construct the residence. The slope above the planned building footprint is stable in its current configuration. We believe the existing fac- tor of safety (FOS) to be near 2.3. The planned excavation, if not retained, would result in an unacceptable FOS. We modeled the planned excavation with an earth retention force. Our cursory model indicates an FOS similar to the existing FOS can be achieved. CTI. should provide the actual earth retention design for this project. Earth retention systems to allow construction of the new residence as currently planned should not significantly reduce the stability of the slope. Appen- dix A includes figures providing partial output from our slope stability evaluation. The slope should be monitored for movement during construction. Remedial measures may be required if movement is detected. To mitigate the risk of shal- low sloughing and surface raveling, the existing natural vegetation on the slope should be maintained in its current state or improved to provide more complete ground cover. Vegetation with robust, deep root systems is preferable. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 4 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-125 REVISED S:1GS05049.000412012.ReportsiGS05849 120 R1 Revfsed.doc EARTHWORK Excavations Deep excavations (up to +/- 45 feet) will be required to construct the crawlspace/mechanical level of the residence. We anticipate excavations will ex- pose sandy clay above clayey to silty gravel with cobbles and boulders underlain by bedrock. We anticipate that excavation in the overburden soils can be accom- plished using conventional, extra heavy-duty excavation equipment. Scattered large boulders should be anticipated. Our experience is that a pneumatic hammer attached to a trackhoe can excavate the large boulders and facilitate excavations in the bedrock. The installation of grout columns as pre-shoring for soils nailing of the excavation face would aid in the excavation process by pre-splitting the bed- rock. Pre-splitting would make excavations easier and reduce the potential for "rock excavation" requiring blasting. Excavations must be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safe- ty regulations. Where excavations cannot be laid back to safe slopes, earth reten- tion will be required. We believe that the majority of excavations for the residence cannot be laid back to safe slopes at this site. The sandy clay will classify as a Type B soil and the gravels will classify as Type C soils based on OSHA stand- ards governing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 4 feet should be no steeper than 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type 6 soils and 1.5 to 1 in Type C soils. Bedrock will likely classify as stable rock at the time of excavation; however, because of the potential for adverse bedding and water flowing through the bed- rock and the weathering of the exposed bedrock, we believe the bedrock should be considered a Type A soil. Retention of the bedrock will be required. Contrac- tors are responsible for site safety and providing and maintaining safe and stable excavations, Contractors should identify the soils encountered and ensure that FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED 9:kG505849.00 Oki 2012.ReparlsIG505849120 R1 RevisedAm OSHA standards are met. An excavation plan should be developed by the con- tractor, Excavation Retention To achieve safe and stable excavations and maintain the existing stability on the property and between the property and adjacent properties, earth retention will be needed. Earth retention systems may include a combination of soil nails, micropiles, drilled shafts and post-tensioned anchors. Temporary construction dewatering will likely be required. There are two general concepts for excavation retention: 1) permanent re- tention systems (with integrated foundation walls or with separate foundation walls) that are designed for the life of the building; or 2) temporary retention sys- tems (usually with separate foundation walls) that provide a safe and stable exca- vation during building construction. Where temporary earth retention is installed, the foundation wall is located in front of the retained face and needs to be de- signed for full lateral earth pressure. Permanent excavation retention systems can reduce lateral earth pressures on foundation walls and thus reduce the required reinforcement in, and the thickness of the walls. Furthermore, permanent excava- tion retention systems with integrated building foundation walls typically require less excavation outside the perimeter of buildings. Temporary retention systems generally involve lower construction costs of the retainage system; however, there is no reduction of lateral earth pressures applied to building foundation walls. Construction Dewaterin,g Groundwater was encountered at 29 and 23.5 feet deep (el = 8005 to 8006.5) during our field investigation. We measured groundwater at 20 feet deep (el = 8014) in our boring TH-1 several days after drilling. Groundwater was not found during the drilling of TH-3 and TH-4; these borings were cased with PVC FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 6 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED W,G905849.00V 2012.ReporIMG505849 120 R1 Revised.doc pipe to allow future measurements to groundwater. Groundwater will rise higher in times of higher snowfall or faster snowmelt. Excavations will likely intercept groundwater in isolated natural drainage paths and on the bedrock. Large quanti- ties of seepage may be encountered during spring snowmelt. Percolation Tesfing We performed percolation testing in our percolation hole drilled at the ap- proximate location shown on Figure 2. The testing was performed on May 2, 2014 in the clayey to silty gravel with cobbles and boulders. The testing resulted in a percolation rate of the gravel soils of about 30 minutes per inch. FOUNDATION We anticipate shale bedrock will be found at planned excavation depths below most of the western two-thirds of the planned excavation. Clayey to silty gravels with some cobbles and boulders and a maximum thickness of about 10 feet will be found in excavations made to the eastern one-third of the excavation. To mitigate future differential movement related to variable foundation support, we recommend the residence be founded on footing foundations that are supported by the bedrock. If the residence foundation is supported on footing foundations on both the gravel and bedrock, differential movement of the foundation needs to be considered. We suggest to assume no movement where footings are on bed- rock and 1 percent compression times the thickness where footings are on gravel. It may be appropriate to reach the bedrock for foundation bearing by utilizing drilled shafts to pass through the overburden gravel. Basically the shafts would result in round footings. A representative of our firm should be called to observe soils in the founda- tion excavation and check that conditions are as anticipated and suitable for sup- FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 7 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED S:ZS05849.0002018.Repam%GS05849 120 R1 Revisad.doc port of the foundation as designed. Recommended design and construction crite- ria for footings are presented below. 1 . Footing foundations should be supported by the bedrock. Soils loosened during excavation or the forming process for the footings should be removed, or the soils can be re-compacted prior to placing concrete. Differential settlement and potential building movement could be reduced if the entire foundation is supported on bedrock. 2. Footings supported by the bedrock should be designed for a maxi- mum allowable soil pressure of 8,000 psf. 3. A friction factor of 0.45 can be used to calculate resistance to sliding between concrete footings and bedrock. 4. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum di- mensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes will be required, based upon anticipated foundation loads. 5. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets and resist lateral earth pres- sures. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsup- ported distance of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be de- signed by the structural engineer. 6. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least 42 inches below finished exterior grades. The applicable building department should be consulted regarding required frost protection depth. FLOOR SY'ST'EM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE Subgrade level floors are anticipated to be slabs-on-grade in some areas and structurally supported above crawl spaces in other areas. If the slabs are supported on both the gravel and bedrock, differential settlement of the slabs may occur. We would anticipate no movement of slabs supported on bedrock and 0.5 percent compression times the gravel thickness for slabs supported on gravel. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 8 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO,GS05849-120 REVISED SnG805849.00MI2012,ReportslGS05849 120 R1 RevisedAm Slab underdrain and crawl space floor drain systems as described in the following SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE section should be provided below the floors. Backfili below exterior slabs-on-grade will settle. In areas of deep backfill, a positive alter- native to reduce slab movement is provision of a structurally supported floor. We recommend the following precautions for slab-on-grade construction at this site. 1. Slabs should be separated from wall footings and column pads with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. 2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the slabs are poured. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with flexible couplings to slab-supported appliances. 3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence. These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent units. 4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with Amer- ican Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. 5. The International Building Code (IBC) or International Residential Code (IRC) require a vapor retarder be placed between the base course or subgrade soils and concrete slab-on-grade floors. The merits of installation of a vapor retarder below floor slabs depend on the sensitivity of floor coverings and building to moisture. A properly installed vapor retarder(10 mil minimum) is more beneficial below concrete slab-on-grade floors where floor coverings, painted floor surfaces or products stored on the floor will be sensitive to moisture. The vapor retarder is most effective when concrete is placed directly on top of it. A sand or gravel leveling course should not be placed between the vapor retarder and the floor slab. The placement of concrete on the vapor retarder may increase the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Use of concrete with reduced shrinkage char- acteristics including minimized water content, maximized coarse ag- gregate content, and reasonably low slump will reduce the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Considerations and recommenda- tions for the installation of vapor retarders below concrete slabs are outlined in Section 3.2.3 of the 2003 report of American Concrete In- FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 9 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED &IGS05949.0001I2012,RoparWGS05849 126 R1 Revlsed,6oc stitute (ACI) Committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction (ACI 302.8-96)". Structurally Supported Floors A structural floor is supported by the foundation system, Design and con- struction issues associated with structural floors include ventilation and lateral loads. Where structurally supported floors are installed over a crawl space, the required air space depends on the materials used to construct the floor and the potential expansion of the underlying soils. Building codes require a clear space of 18 inches between exposed earth and untreated wood floor components. For non- organic systems, we recommend a minimum clear space of 12 inches. This min- imum clear space should be maintained between any point on the underside of the floor system (including beams, plumbing pipes and floor drain traps) and the soils. Where structurally supported floors are used, utility connections, including water, gas, air duct, and exhaust stack connections to floor supported appliances should be capable of absorbing some deflection of the floor. Plumbing that passes through the floor should ideally be hung from the underside of the structural floor and not laid on the bottom of the excavation. This configuration may not be achievable for some parts of the installation. It is prudent to maintain the minimum clear space below all plumbing lines. If trenching below the lines is necessary, we recommend sloping these trenches so they discharge to the foundation drain. Control of humidity in crawl spaces is important for indoor air quality and performance of wood floor systems. We believe the best current practices to con- trol humidity involve the use of a vapor retarder or vapor barrier (10 mil minimum) placed on the soils below accessible subfloor areas. The vapor retarder/barrier should be sealed at joints and attached to concrete foundation elements. A posi- tive approach to protect wood floors above crawl spaces is to install a mechanical FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 10 PROJECT NO,GS05849.120 REVISED S:1G505849.0001120i2.Reparts!GS05849 120 RI Revised.doc ventilation system controlled by a humidistat in crawl space areas. When a pre- set humidity is determined, mechanical systems should activate to create airflow in the space. BELOW-GRACE CONSTRUCTION Foundation walls which extend below-grade should be designed for lateral earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides of the wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth pres- sure. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage of the backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflec- tion. For a very rigid foundation wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at-rest" lateral earth pressure should be used in design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1 percent of wall height (depending upon the backfill types, lower"active" lateral earth pressures are appropriate. If the on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend design of below- grade walls using an equivalent fluid density of at least 55 pcf for this site. This equivalent density does not include allowances for sloping backfill, surcharges or hydrostatic pressures. Backfill placed adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be placed in accordance with the recommendations in the FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL COMPACTION section. Exterior flatwork such as patios and exterior columns which are supported on backfill should be expected to settle and crack. Where movement and cracking is not considered acceptable, the structures should be structurally supported. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 519 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849.120 REVISED S:W05849.000120i2.Rcp¢rtstGS05849 120 R1 Revised.dac • SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE We anticipate that subsurface water will flow towards the site at elevations above the planned subgrade level. The water will need to be collected in perma- nent dewatering systems (drains). We are providing recommendations for a per- manent drainage system. We have observed occasional incidents of water in basement window wells after construction. We recommend considering a drain pipe to connect the bottom of window wells to the foundation drain. Section R310.2.2 of the 2012 IRC re- quires a drain in the window wells. We recommend an exterior foundation drain be installed around the perim- eter and adjacent to below-grade interior foundation walls where the foundation steps down the slope (if any). A washed rock layer with an embedded PVC drain pipe network should be provided under below-grade floor slabs and in crawl space areas. The exterior foundation drains should consist of 4 inch diameter, rigid, slot- ted PVC pipe encased in free draining gravel. A prefabricated drainage compo- site should be placed adjacent to foundation walls. Care should be taken during backfill operations to prevent damage to drainage composites. The drain should lead to a sump pit where water can be removed by pumping. Gravity outlets should be protected from clogging and freezing. The drain outlets should be checked at least twice each year to verify they are not blocked. Installation of clean outs along the drain pipes is recommended. Slab-on-grade floors should be protected from wetting by installation of an under slab blanket drain. We recommend constructing underslab drains consist- ing of 2-inch diameter, slotted PVC pipe installed on 10 to 12 foot centers and embedded in at least 6 inches of washed gravel. The pipes should convey water FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 12 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.G505849-120 REVISED S:MS05849.0001120V.ReponsXOS05849120 R1 ReAsed.doc • 0 to perimeter drain collector pipes. Placement of a moisture retarder above the washed rock layer is required in the International Residential Code to mitigate the potential for water vapor transmission through floor slabs. Typical foundation and blanket drain details are shown on Figures 9 and 10. FOUNDATION WALL BACKFILL COMPACTION Settlement of foundation wall and utility trench backfill can cause damage to concrete flatwork and/or result in poor drainage conditions. Compaction of backfill can reduce settlement. Attempts to compact backfill near foundations to a high degree can cause damage to foundation walls and window wells and may increase lateral pressures on the foundation walls. The potential for cracking of a foundation wall can vary widely based on many factors, including the degree of compaction achieved, the weight and type of compaction equipment utilized, the structural design of the wall, the strength of the concrete at the time of backfill compaction, and the presence of temporary or permanent bracing. Backfill placed adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be free of or- ganic matter, debris and rocks larger than about 3 inches in diameter. Backfill should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to about 90 to 95 percent of standard Proctor(ASTM D 698) max- imum dry density. We recommend that density and moisture content of backfill be tested during placement. The top 1 to 2 feet of backfill should consist of a clayey soil to limit surface water infiltration. Proper moisture conditioning of backfill is as important as compaction, be- cause settlement commonly occurs in response to wetting. The addition of water complicates the backfill process, especially during cold weather. Frozen soils are not considered suitable for use as backfill because excessive settlement can re- sult when the frozen materials thaw. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 13 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849.120 REVISED S:IGS05849.0001120U.ReportstGS05B49120 Rt Revised.doc Precautions should be taken when backfilling against below-grade walls. Temporary bracing of comparatively long, straight sections of walls should be used to limit damage to walls during the compaction process. Waiting at least seven days after the walls are placed to allow the concrete to gain strength can also reduce the risk of damage. Compaction of fill placed beneath and next to window wells, counterforts, and grade beams may be difficult to achieve without damaging these building elements. Proper moisture conditioning of the fill prior to placement in these areas will help reduce potential settlement. Foundation wall backfill may be between the face of earth retention and the foundation walls. The width of fill will vary based on the required earth retention system. Widths of 1 to 3 feet are common for the type of construction planned. Well placed fill will likely settle about one percent of fill thickness. Where concrete flatwork is placed on the fill, this amount of settlement may not be considered ac- ceptable. Options to reduce the potential settlement include structurally support- ing the flatwork or supporting the flatwork on materials that would settle less or more uniformly than soils. We believe the use of expanded polystyrene (EPS, Geofoam) or flowable fill (lean mix concrete) could be used to reduce settlement. Subsequent to the development of earth retention plans, we can provide backfill recommendations to mitigate the potential for backfill settlement adversely effect- ing concrete flatwork performance. EARTH RETAINING WALLS Reinforced concrete retaining walls may be constructed. Reinforced con- crete retaining walls can be supported on the natural gravel soils or bedrock. De- sign criteria for retaining walls can be provided once the actual locations and bot- tom of wail locations are known. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 14 611 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED 9.,wso5649.0001120l2,RepoAs=05849120 R1 Revlsed.doc 0 w Retaining walls which can rotate should be designed to resist "active" lat- eral earth pressures calculated using an equivalent fluid density of at least 40 pcf. Retaining walls with reinforcement that is tied into building foundation walls that are not free to rotate should be designed to resist "at rest' lateral earth pressures using an equivalent fluid density of at least 55 pcf. A passive earth pressure of 300 pcf can be used to calculate resistance from sliding for permanent embed- ment depths. These pressures do not include allowances for sloping backfill or hydrostatic pressures. Backfill behind retaining walls and in front of retaining wall footings should be placed and compacted as outlined in the BACKFILL COMPACTION section. A drain will be needed behind retaining walls. Figure 11 shows a typical earth retaining wall drain. SURFACE DRAINAGE Proper design, construction, and maintenance of surface drainage is critical to the satisfactory performance of foundations, slabs-on-grade, and other improve- ments. Landscaping and irrigation practices will also affect performance. Exhibit A contains our recommendations for surface drainage, irrigation, and maintenance. CONCRETE Concrete in contact with soil can be subject to sulfate attack. We tested one soil sample for water soluble sulfate concentrations. The tested sample con- tained 0.00 percent water soluble sulfates. For this level of sulfate concentration, ACI 332-08 Code Requirements for Residential Concrete indicates there are no special requirements for sulfate resistance. In our experience, superficial damage may occur to the exposed surfaces of highly permeable concrete, even though sulfate levels are relatively low. To FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE is 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.OS05849-120 REVISED &IGS05848.000112012.ReportsIGS05M 120 R1 Revtsed.doc r control this risk and to resist freeze-thaw deterioration, the water-to-cementitious materials ratio should not exceed 0.50 for concrete in contact with soils that are likely to stay moist due to surface drainage or high water tables. Concrete should have a total air content of 6% +l- 1.5%. We advocate all foundation walls and grade beams in contact with the subsoils (including the inside and outside faces of garage and crawl space grade beams) be damp-proofed. ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION, CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS AND MONITORING This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Forum Phi Architec- ture and the design team for the purpose of providing geotechnical design and construction criteria for the proposed project. The information, conclusions, and recommendations presented herein are based upon consideration of many factors including, but not limited to, the type of structures proposed, the geologic setting, and the subsurface conditions encountered. The conclusions and recommenda- tions contained in the report are not valid for use by others. Standards of practice evolve in geotechnical engineering. The recommendations provided are appropri- ate for about three years. If the proposed project is not constructed within about three years, we should be contacted to determine if we should update this report. We recommend that CTL I Thompson, Inc. provide construction observa- tion services to allow us the opportunity to verify whether soil conditions are con- sistent with those found during this investigation. If others perform these observa- tions, they must accept responsibility to judge whether the recommendations in this report remain appropriate. rORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 16 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED S;1GS05849.000112012.RopodsIGS05849120 R1 Revlsed.doc GEOTECHNICAL RISK The concept of risk is an important aspect with any geotechnical evaluation, primarily because the methods used to develop geotechnical recommendations do not comprise an exact science. We never have complete knowledge of subsur- face conditions. Our analysis must be tempered with engineering judgment and experience. Therefore, the recommendations presented in any geotechnical eval- uation should not be considered risk-free. We cannot provide a guarantee that the interaction between the soils and a proposed structure will be as desired or in- tended. Our recommendations represent our judgment of those measures that are necessary to increase the chances that the structures will perform satisfactorily. It is critical that all recommendations in this report are followed during construction. Home owners must assume responsibility for maintaining the structure and use appropriate practices regarding drainage and landscaping. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional geotechnical engineering services are required based on the planned construction. We recommend that CTL I Thompson, Inc. provide the fol- lowing additional geotechnical services: 1. Design of earth retention systems, including detailed analysis of the stability of the slope above and below the planned construction; 2. Review of the excavation plans; 3. Review of final building plans; and 4. Construction observations and materials testing. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 17 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED 3:4505849.006112012.RepoRsIGS05848120 RI Revised.doc LIMITATIONS Our exploratory borings were located in accessible areas. The locations of our borings were limited by utilities, the existing residence, and steep slopes on the lot. Subsurface conditions not indicated by our borings will occur. A repre- sentative of our firm should be called to observe and test fill placement and ob- serve the completed foundation excavation to confirm that the exposed soils are suitable for support of the footings as designed. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No warranty, express or im- plied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report, please call. CTL TROMPS N, INC. p* T O O, , e in +' 4 c c 'Anager •°C 0 T/ cc: Via email dandersonCaD-forumphi.com FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 18 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05949-120 REVISED SMSOS849.000112012.ReponsIGS05849120 R1 Revised.doc _7 14 14 ERW YJ10 Q,�� .y5 _ tip` .•, ' J r � rrf�. CD 46 �� '� f•[� ���• \\' ter" 4 r—ca .`� [ -�',♦sv ..,� f.. .t;' �(� `,L?" �l JJJ------ .s r ♦ l Poo If , �.� �, • • ._i, / •'./'moi j, a- ` �� _ •f• ��'rr7�t �,�.t�� .4•� ' ••.•y�.:}• � ., f i U j�_ '�I lit ���' '��l 1. 1��1�}' .i! Jti,�...7I j•, ` J '`' � �- fr •. •�•�. Q 4 f�� ppQ6'=' m j Septic NOTE. Lids LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY SSE- BORINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. 0 V�K�s x a�► SCALE: V-40' V (ul1 t� GAS'. SS°€ FF Bog 2�Se �> �� ting:H • : Exls . - • T 2 ' PERC , HOLE • Concrete AsPholt 0 � Q Cl): d m � L Locations of aso m . Exploratory W Borings and m Found No. 5 Rebar p : Existing p with Ye/%w Plastic Cap Conditions FORUM PHI ARPHITECTURE N ;th L.S., #9184 �" 611 LAZY OI WR ROAD,=2 Project No. PS05849-120 Fig. 2 TH-:1 TH:2 TH-3 TH-4: , P-1 El. 8034 EI. 8030 El. 8050 El.8050 El.8029 -0 0 00, oil ANTICIPATED ol OP L40WEST LEVELoep 0 Q. 6/6,916,6/6 5112 ELEVATION 5 OF op, 55/12 5 00, ANTICIPATED LOWEST LEVEL ELEVATIONop: 40 (8027} 00, 10112 '0 50/10 14 50/10 1 a 40 Aw : d 50/12 15 39/12 ol 30/2of 15 oil� o. P 5f1/13. 50/7 20 - ol' 50/1 20 O- ol oll loop 3176;1915 25 25 0 2716,3313 m m m 'T m m m' Q. - '34/6,1613 o. ':50/3 34 - . soLt 30: 2316,27/3 50/4 — 35 35 i ANTICIPATED LOWEST LEVEL .-44 ELEVATION -- 40— (8010) 45 45 r50 50/1 50- -55 55 50/0 60 60. SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE FIG. 3 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD, LOT 2 PROJECT NO. GS05849-120 LEGEND: ®SANDY CLAY-TOPSOIL",ORGANICS,MOIST,BROWN. ®CLAY,SANDY WITH OCCASIONAL GRAVEL,MEDIUM STIFF TO STIFF TO STIFF,MOIST, BROWN,RUST. GRAVEL,CLAYEY TO SILTY,COBBLES AND BOULDERS,DENSE TO VERY DENSE,MOIST TO WET,BROWN,RUST,GRAY. SHALE BEDROCK,VERY HARD,WET,BLACK. DRIVE SAMPLE.THE SYMBOL 10/12 INDICATES 10 BLOWS OFA 140-POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 2.5-INCH O.D.SAMPLER 12 INCHES, DRIVE SAMPLE.THE SYMBOL 6/6,9/6,6/6 INDICATES 6 BLOWS OF A 140-POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 2.0-INCH O.D.SAMPLER 6 INCHES. St WATER LEVEL MEASURED AT TIME OF DRILLING. WATER LEVEL MEASURED SEVERAL DAYS AFTER DRILLING. NOTES: 1. EXPLORATORY BORINGS TH-1 AND TH-2 FOR THIS INVESTIGATION WERE DRILLED ON APRIL 24,2014 WITH 4-INCH DIAMETER,CONTINUOUS-FLIGHT SOLID—STEM AUGER AND A TRACK-MOUNTED DRILL RIG.EXPLORATORY BORINGS TH-3 AND TH4 WERE DRILLED ON JUNE 25 AND 26,2014 WITH AN AIR ROTARY PERCUSSION SYSTEM AND AN ALL TERRAIN cn VEHICLE DRILL RIG. 2. LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS WAS APPROXIMATE. (LLL K w 3. THESE EXPLORATORY BORINGS ARE SUBJECT TO THE EXPLANATIONS,LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS AS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT. 0 0 h SUMMARY LEGEND OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 FIG. 4 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 SCALE: 1'- W T a -uNdstuRemarEutEA , , l C .\ MWATE TO nn-c r !T� v Elq'I,WTETO Btlar 4.- \ JH-4 y l.a• `gym_. ' _a GRw?t — ` i..F _ oiGW,�lElo eor • TH-3 11.1 �,- ,owATeToaxr zi TH-2 o�rwvFTETo �� rr� ` tx PERC • (3 HOLE \ CCAVATETOW t 'YT A O+) LOWER LEVEL ELEV=8027' RELOCATED EVERGREEN RELOCATED DECIDUOUS Excavation Plan PROPOSED EVERGREEN PROPOSED DECIDUOUS (07-07-2014) and m . Boring FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE Locations 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD.LOT 2 U Project No. GS05849-120 Fig. 5 ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER i } ' ! i CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO ---—---------- ----------- .......... 0 ...--------- -2 z 0 -4 —--—-—---- -------- z x ....... ----------- z . .......... _0 -6 ........... Uj 0 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED:-PRESSURE KSF Sample of CLAY,SANDY.(PL) DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 111 PCF 4—� 7 From TH-1 AT 10.5 FEET MOISTURE CONTENT= 14.3 % FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE Swell Conso'lidation 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 Test Results PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 SAGS05649.000112016.CaicsIReport 21GS05849120 Sweli.xis FIG.6 — HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR, 7 HR, TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15MIN, 60 MIN,19 MIN, 4 MIN. 1 MIN. '200 100 '50 '40'30_ 16 'f0'8 '4 3118` 314" 1'h' 3' 5'6' W 100 I r—r --z —i— I."". _ — I -.0 l 90 t a -- - I ( 10 {f r 20 ... _ Ti 1 070 I -�-- f 44 I ao d ¢60 - 40 Ci i 50 u (L 40 ' 60 77 70- 1 20 t T 1 1 1 aG f loo 1 , .001 0.002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS . CLAY(ELASTIC)TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC) u — -mm. SAND 5— GRAVEL . FINE MEDIUM COARS FINE COARSE COBBLES Sample of SAND,SILTY(SM} GRAVEL 37 % SAND 26 % _._ . _�.. _. _. rn_, __._ 1>n,....,._ . . SILT&CLAY 37 % LIQUID LIMIT % From TH-1 AT 94 FEET: PLASTICITY INDEX oho HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR. TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN.19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. '200 '100 50'40 '30 '16 '10'8 4 318' 3/4' 1'4' 3' 516, 8" 100 -0 90 % f., 120 y tT70 Z z n I a a 0 — +.- 40 777 .—� I f i z k _ U 4G I — I60 a I i1, oel, I uL.30 '70 20 10 --- 90 i II ) fj p ���._�, .001 0.002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 J 1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMI TER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS CLAY(PLASTIC)TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC) SANDS GRAVEL FINEME01UM OARS F114E COARSE COBBLES Sample of SAND, SILTY(SM) GRAVEL -3.3 % SAND —41-% From TH-2 AT 9 FEE`f SILT&CiAY 2� % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX Y % FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE Gradation 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 Test Results S3GS05849.000II12016.CaIcsIRaport 21GS05849120 Gradatiamxls FIG. 7 r�—HYDROMETER ANALYSIS T-� SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR. TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MtN 60 MIN. 19 MIN. 4 MIN, 1 MIN. '200 '100 'SO'40'30 '16 '10'8 -4 318' 314" 1%, 3' 5"6' A' 1000 _ ! -- I ( ! 90 I 10 80 20 - -I---k 3D + w { 1 LU I , 40 LU W50 —50 U Ix 000 ! + I r a-40 so , I --- - 80 - # x 10 I =30 p 100 001 0.002 005 .009 .019 W.037 y.074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 6.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS _ L:EY�(PLASTIC) 3AN05GRAVEL TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC} FINE MEDIUM COARS I FINE COARSE I COBBLES Sample of SAND,SILTY(SM}• - GRAVEL 13 °!° SAND 42 °!a _.,_. , .._ " SILT&CLAY..... 45 % LIQUID LIMIT % From TH-2 AT 14.5 FEET PLASTICITY INDEX _% HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR. TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN.19 MIN- a MIN. 1 MIN. `200 '100 '50'40'30 `16 '1D`6 'a 318' 314' IA* 3` 5"6" 8" go I � .nt 1 '20 - I ;. we -.. _ L I 30 40 z m I ul I Z I W z ? i I � w so CL 30 70 i 20 -- - ----(— :— �-80 10 (— so I � ' S00 .001 0.002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 149 .297 .590 1,19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19-1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DINAF.TER OF WiRTICLE-IN MILLIMETERS SANDS GRAVEL CLAY(PtA5T1C)TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC) FINE MEDIUM I COARS FINE I COARSE COBBLES Sample of SAND SILTY(SM) GRAVEL 26 % SAND 46 % From TH-2 AT 24 FEET SILT&CLAY _ _ _.28% LIQUID LMT % PLASTICITY INDEX % FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE Gradation 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 Test Results SAGS05849.0001120Wb CakslRep°rt 21GS05849120 Gradation.xls FIG.8 O � N re S NOTE: SLOPE DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES PER RT BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE HIGHEST>POINT. AND 'SLOPE. DOWNWARD TO A POSITIVE GRAVTIY OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE 2-3' REMOVED BY PUMPING. BACKFILL (COMPM1 4 AND COMPACTION PER PROVIDE- PLASTIC SHEETING GLUED TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE PREFABRICATEDMOISTURE PENETRATION DRAINAGE ~\ COMPOSITE BELOW GRADE WALL SLOPE (MIRADRAIN 6000 PER OR EQUIVALENT) OSHA REINFORCING STEEL PER -STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS PROVIDE POSITIVE SUP JOINT BETWEEN SLAB AND WALL COVER GRAVEL WITH FLOOR SLAB FILTER FABRIC. ... .............. t , ..............:. • .. T. .... w •iii...«.. . ' ... .. ........... PVC DRAIN NETWORK 2" MINIMUM IMBEDDED IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE - 8' MINIMUM OR BEYOND 1:1 FOOTING OR PAD SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67). EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST 1/2::HEIGH`T,OF'1fOOTING. Exterior Foundation FORUM PHI ARCHMECTURE Wail Drain 611 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 Project,No. GS05849-1'20 Fig,. 9 ri d i c A NOTE. SLOPE DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES ' p_ER RE2081BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE (- HIGHEST-POINT AND SLOPE I DOWNWARD TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE 2-3' REMOVED BY PUMPING. BACKFILL MIRADRAIN G20ON STRUCTURALLY SUPPORTED OR EQUIVALENT FLOOR SYSTEM SLOPE PER OSHA REINFORCING STEEL ER :STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS COVER ENTIRE WIDTH OF GRAVEL ;;. /-CRAWL SPACE WITH NON-WOVEN GEOTEX71LE r FABRIC MIRAFI 14ON OR EQUIVALENT). ROOFING FELT IS :; ; {. 'MUD SLAB' OR AN ACCEPTABLE. ALTERNATIVE.. VAPOR BARRIER: •. .... . ...... . .. WID�t W 2 MINIMUM . ATTACH PLASTIC SHEETING TO FOUNDATION WALL 8' MINIMUM OR BEYOND 1:1 SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. PVC DRAIN NETWORK (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) IMBEDDED IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE. 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE OF AT LEAST 1/8 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. EXterior Foundation FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE Wali ®rain 611 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 Project No. GS05843-'I20 FIg.. 10 x R" O I Z 4 G 12' MIN. -.— 10 BACKFILL WITH SILTY Z• OR CLAYEY ON—SITE SOIL. l 1 +� ►.}+n ,s:� PROVIDE GRAVEL LAYER BEHIND `WALL'`WASHED CONCRETE 'AGGREGATE s<+ (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR H0. 67). 3 BACKFILL !:�. •"' ON—SITE .; .; •t MATERIALSI ;:; 'r•' ,. .• ''�" .. • ................ RETAINING._WALL.. i.e.•a., ::•r:.................. REINFORCING STEEL ' .' PER STRUCTURAL �' :.1 SLOPE DRAWINGS. ' : » . ,.. PER OSHA 4—INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED RIGID DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE =;::�• SHOULD :BE PLACED IN ,A TRENCH Y. WRH A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/16—INCH AND 1/8—INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. DISCHARGE TO POSITIVE GRAViiY OUTLET OR SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED BY PUMPING. FOOTING OR OTHER TYPE FOUNDATION Typical Earth FORUM PHI ARCHrrECTURE Retaining e... 611 LAZY CHAIR ROAD.LOT 2 a ii �ra O n Project No. GS05849-120 Flg. 11 TABLE I SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 ATTIE 9WEEL TEST RESULTS* PASSING MOISTURE DRY LIQUID PLASTICITY APPLIED SOLUBLE PERCENT PERCENT NO.200 EXPLORATORY DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY LIMIT INDEX SWELL PRESSURE SULFATES GRAVEL SAND SIEVE BORING FEET % PCF) % (% (%) (PSF) M . %) M DESCRIPTION T -1 4;. 17.8 25 7 44 SAW SIC"TO CLAYEY.{SC-SM TH-1 11 14.3 111 -0.1 1,000 CLAY,SANDY CL TH-1 14., 9.4 37 26 37 GRAVEL,SILTY TO CLAYEY GC-GM TH-1 29,, 15.3 118 41 SAND,SILTY(SM) TH-2 4 20.9 100` 0.000 SAND,SILTY TO CLAYEY SC-SM TH-2 9 9.7 33 '41 26 SAND,SILTY SM TH-2 15. 7.8 137` 13 42 45 SAND,SILTY SM TH-2 241. 78.0 26 46 28 SAND,SILTY SM TH-2 34 12.2 18 3 21 SAND,SILTY SM SWELL MEASURED WITH iDOO PSF APPLIED PRESSURE_,OR ESTIMATED IN-SITU OVERBURDEN PRESSURE. NEGATIVE VALUE INDICATES COMPRESSION. Page 1 0l 1 511 Lazy Chair, Lot 2 Maroon Creek Club Aspen, Colorado Name: Gravel,silty with cobbles and boulders • Existing Conditions Unit Weight: 132 pcf Cohesion: 0 psf Phi:30° z s Name: Bedrock Unit Weight: 138 pcf 8.10N Cohesion: 500 psf 8.09 — Phi: 42° C) 8.07 0 13.06 i-- X 8.05 O 8.04 �- > 8.03 tL 8.02 - ----_-.- 8.01 --` • 8.00 . i 7.99 - -- - _ 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 Distance Project No. GSOSB49-120 Fig.A-1 511 Lazy Chair. Lot 2 Maroon Creek Club Aspen, Colorado Name: Gravel,silty with cobbles and boulders Unit Weight: 132 pcf Cohesion:0 psf • Phi: 30 ° Distubance limit Name: Bedrock 8 Unit Weight: 138 pd • Cohesion: 250 psf Phi:42 ° 8.10 8.09 8.08 !-. 8.07 8.06 i-- 8.05 t- CO 8.04 �- 8.03 8.02 L 8.01 8.00 7.99 _i__�_.�---1--------- 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 Distance Project GS05849-145 Fig. A-2 511 Lazy Chair, Lot 2 Maroon Creek Club Aspen, Colorado Name:Gravel, silty with cobbles and boulders Unit Weight: 132 pcf Cohesion: 0 psf • Phi:30 ° Excavation with restraint force Name: Bedrock 9 Unit Weight: 138 pcf • Cohesion:250 psf Phi:42 ' 8.10 8.09 8.08 0 8.07CD 806 r- 8.05 �- p 8.04 �- > 8.03 — 8.02 Retention force W i- 8.01 ------------------------------------------------------------ • 8.00 7.99 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 Distance Project No. GS05849-120 Fig A-3 0 EXHIBIT B SURFACE DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION AND MAINTENANCE Performance of foundations.and concrete flatwork is influenced by the moisture conditions existing within the foundation soils. Surface drainage should be designed to provide rapid runoff of surface water away from the proposed residence. Proper surface drainage and irrigation practices can help control the amount of surface water that pene- trates to foundation levels and contributes to settlement or heave of soils and bedrock that support foundations and slabs-on-grade. Positive drainage away from the foundation and avoidance of irrigation near the foundation also help to avoid excessive wetting of backfill soils, which can lead to increased backfill settlemenfand possibly to higher lateral earth pressures, due to increased weight and reduced strength of the backfill. CTL I Thompson, Inc, recommends the following precautions. The home owner should maintain surface drainage and, if an irrigation system is installed, it should substantially conform to these recommendations. 1. Wetting or drying of the open foundation excavations should be avolded. 2. Excessive wetting of foundation soils before, during and after construction can cause heave or softening of fill and foundation soils and result in foun- dation and slab movements. Proper surface drainage around the residence and between lots is critical to control wetting. 3. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should be sloped to drain away from the building in all directions. We recommend a minimum constructed slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet(10 per- cent)in landscaped areas around the residence,where practical. We do not view the recommendation to provide a 10 percent slope away from"the foundation as an absolute. It is desirable to create this slope where practical, because we know that backfill will likely settle to some degree. By starting with sufficient slope, positive drainage can be maintained for most settlement conditions. There are many situations around a residence where a 10 percent slope cannot be achieved practically, such as around patios, at inside foundation corners, and between a house and nearby sidewalk. In these areas,we'believe it is desirable to establish as much•slope as practk. cal and to avoid irrigation.We believe it is acceptable to use a slope on the order of 5 percent perpendicular to the foundation in these limited areas. For lots graded to direct drainage from the rear yard to the front, it is difficult to achieve 10 percent slope at the high point behind the house. We believe it is acceptable to use a slope of about 6 inches in the first 10 feet(5 per- cent)at this location. Construction of retaining walls and decks adjacent to the residence should not alter the recommended slopes and surface drainage around the resi- dence. Ground surface under the deck should be compacted and slope away from the residence. A 10-mil plastic sheeting and landscaping rock is recommended above the ground under the decks to reduce water dripping from the deck causing soil erosion and/or forming depressions under the FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 Exhibit A-1 PROJECT NO.GS0SU9420 REVISED 9:16305049.000112012.Reports1GS05849120 R1 Revised.doc deck. The plastic sheeting should direct water away from the residence. Retaining walls should not flatten the surface drainage around the resi- dence and block or impede the surface runoff. 4: Swales used to convey water across yards and between houses should be sloped so:that-_water:moves quickly and:does not•pond fior extended periods of time. We suggest minimum slopes of about 2 to 2.5 percent in grassed areas and about 2 percent where landscaping rock or other materials are present. If slopes less than about 2 percent are necessary, concrete-lined channels or plastic pipe should be used. 5.. Backfill around.the foundation walls should..be,moistened.and co.mpacted... 6. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all. backfill. Splash blocks and/or extensions should be provided at all down- spouts so water discharges onto the ground beyond the backfill. We gener- ally recommend against burial of downspout discharge. Where it is neces- sary to bury downspout discharge, solid, rigid pipe should be used and it should slope to an open gravity outlet. Downspout extensions,splash blocks and buried outlets must be maintained by the home owner. 7. The importance of proper home owner irrigation practices cannot be over- emphasized. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation; application of more water will increase likelihood of slab and foundation movements. Landscaping should be carefully.designed and maintained to minimize irrigation. Plants placed close to foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements. Irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of foundations. Plastic sheeting should not be placed beneath landscaped areas adjacent to foundation walls or grade beams. Geotextile fabric will inhibit weed growth yet still allow natural evaporation to occur. 8. The design and construction criteria for foundations and floor system alter- natives were compiled with the expectation that all other recommendations presented in this report related to surface and subsurface drainage, land- scaping.irrigation, backfill compaction, etc.will be incorporated.into the pro- ject. It is critical that all recommendations in this report are followed. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 Exhibit A-2 PROJECT NO.GS05849-120 REVISED 5:IG505849.0001120W.Repods1GS05849 120 R1 Revlsed.doc CTL I THOM PSON July 23, 2014 Forum Phi Architecture 715 West Main Street, Suite 204 Aspen, CO 81611 Attention: Dustin Anderson Subject: Steep and Potentially Unstable Slopes and Geologic Hazards Report for the Residence Planned at 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2 Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado Project No. GS05849-120 This letter provides our comments relative to a)Title 26, Land Use Regulation. Section 26.435.030.0.1 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations and b) the "Steep and Potentially Unstable Slopes" (Section 7-20-20) and "Geologic Hazards" (Section 7-20-50) sections of the Pitkin County Land Use Code relative to new construction at the subject location. Descriptions of the subsurface conditions at the property and the planned new construction are provided in our Soils and Foundation Investigation dated July 18, 2014. Geologic Hazards assessment is required in a)Title 26, Land Use Regulation. Section 26.435.030.0.1 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations and b) Section 7-20-50 of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. 511 Lazy Chair Road has an existing single-family home and driveway that will be demolished and removed from the site to allow for construction of a new residence. The subject parcel is situated on the moderate-sloping east side of a local hill between Tiehack Road and Maroon Creek, east of the Buttermilk Ski Area. Published geologic mapping, confirmed by our borings shows the site is underlain by lateral glacial moraine deposits that include sand, silt, cobbles and boulders (Reference 1). An excerpt from the geologic map is reproduced below as Figure 1. Bedrock from the Cretaceous age Upper Shale member of the Mancos Shale formation underlies the glacial drift. The Upper Shale member is typically thin bedded dark gray limey shale and sandstone. An ancient, inactive fault is inferred below the glacial drift on Reference 1. Our borings encountered 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs,Colorado 81601 Telephone:970-945-2809 Fax:970-945-7411 significantly deeper bedrock in the boring drilled east of the residence (TH-1) than in those drilled west(TH-3 and TH-4). We doubt this is due to the fault, and more likely due to the filling by the receding glacier of the previously eroded Maroon Creek drainage. On Bruce Bryant's 1972 Map Showing Areas of Selected Potential Geologic Hazards in the Aspen Quadrangle, Reference 3, the project site is not designated as having exposure to Flood Plains, Alluvial Fans, Landslides, Rockfall Areas, Wet Meadows or Potentially Unstable Slopes. This map is of a scale large enough that it is not sufficient to evaluate geologic hazards present on any specific site planned for development. 'ptV t /r I ,itis 1 1 20 Qga Kmf 3 ■ i 1 Figure 1—Snapshot from the Reference 1 Geologic Map showing the existing residence as a dot located just left(west)of"k"the word"Creek." Our personnel were present during drilling borings for the new development. I traversed the slopes above and below the existing residence, FORUM PHI ARCHITGCTURR 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05USI-120 SAGS05849.000112013.LattaWGS05849420 L2 Geolog;.Hazards.doc made observations of the parcel and took photographs during my site visit on July 20, 2014. My(David Glater) experience in the area and review of pertinent literature and aerial photographs has allowed me to form opinions as to the existence of geologic hazards on the parcel. Section 7-2-50 of the Land Use Code lists several common alpine geologic hazards to be evaluated including Avalanche, Landslide, Rockfall, Alluvial Fans, Talus Slope, Mancos Shale, Faults, Expansive Soil and Rock and Ground Subsidence. Each of these is specifically discussed in the following bulleted points. • Avalanche: Due to the limited slope length above the residence of about 200 feet and inclination of about 25 percent, I believe there is nil potential for avalanche. Rockfall: The parcel is not subject to rockfall from above, as there are no rock outcrops present above the site and no cobbles or boulders were observed on the ground surface above the site. • Alluvial Fans: No defined drainages or alluvial fans were noted on the site. • Talus Slope: The subject parcel is not subject to exposure to talus slopes. • Mancos Shale: The subject parcel is underlain by Mancos Shale. Mapping shows the bedding inclination is about 20 degrees to the north-northwest. This implies that the shale beds dip into the excavation on the west and south sides, which is an adverse inclination for stability. It is possible the Mancos Shale has an expansion potential upon wetting. Our July 18, 2014 Soil and Foundation Investigation discusses recommended mitigation due to Mancos Shale. • Faults: An ancient, inactive normal fault is present and may be directly under the subject site. This fault was probably last active during the Laramide Orogeny about 30 million years ago, the last mountain-building episode to affect the Aspen area. The presence of this fault does not increase seismic risk beyond what is expected in the region. The Aspen area is generally considered to have risk of only small ground motions with seismic events likely to occur within the expected life of this development. • Expansive Soil and Rock: Laboratory testing conducted for our July 18, 2014 Soil and Foundation Investigation implies there is a very low expansion potential for the Mancos Shale. No precautions due to expansive soil and bedrock are necessary for this site. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 3 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.G505649.120 9:10805849.0001120%1.Lelters%GS05949.120 L2 Geologic Hazards doc • Ground Subsidence: The site may be underlain at depths exceeding 5000 feet by salt beds in the geologically older Eagle Valley Formation and Eagle Valley Evaporite. We are not aware of ground subsidence related to dissolution of the salts that has affected property in the area of this site. We are not aware of undermining under the site due to past metal mining (Reference 4). We believe the potential for ground subsidence to be nil at this site. • Potentially Unstable Slopes: Upslope and downslope areas on the parcel are moderate. Brief observations of the slopes did not reveal evidence of instability. If the temporary excavation slopes are properly engineered, we believe it is unlikely slope instability will affect the site during and after construction. In summary, we believe there are no geologic hazards present at 511 Lazy Chair Road, Lot 2 that preclude the planned development. The parcel on which the proposed development will occur is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mudflow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. The parcel was not found to contain hazardous or toxic soils. Section 7-20-20 of the code delineates existing ground slopes on a land parcel into three categories based on percent ground slope. The three categories are slopes between 15 and 29 percent, slopes between 30 and 44 percent and slopes greater than 45 degrees. This site falls within the first, least stringent category. Development within the different categories is permissible based on meeting various requirements. From a geologic and geotechnical engineering perspective the requirement is that the inherent risk of potential slope instability can be mitigated to provide a safe and stable development subsequent to the completion of construction on a property. Our Soil and Foundation Investigation contains specific recommendations for design and construction of temporary and permanent earth retainage. We recommend that CTL be engaged to provide the design of the required earth retention system. Maximum excavations to construct the basement level will involve excavations of up to 45 feet. Some areas adjacent to the downhill side of the building will require earth retention. To allow for safe and stable excavations at the site a significant earth retention system will need to be designed. The earth retention system may include a combination of cantilevered solider beams, post- tensioned anchors, soil nails and micropiles. The need for temporary or permanent dewatering systems will also need to be evaluated..The installation of earth retention and dewatering systems in the vicinity of the subject parcel is common and a normal construction practice. Earth retention and permanent dewatering systems can be installed that will maintain or improved the global stability on the parcel. FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 4 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.OS05849.120 SAGS05849.0001120U.Lothni 3S05849.120 L10eoiogic Hazards.doc Item 5, a, b, c, d and a provide guidelines for retaining wall construction.. Earth retention and retaining wall designs by CTL I Thompson, Inc. will satisfy the specified criteria. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have questions or we can be of further service, please call. Very truly yours, CTL I T. SON, INC. Jon echling, P.E. finch Manager David A. Glater, P.E., C.P.G. Principal Geological Engineer JM:DAG:cd cc: Via email to danderson(,@-forumghi.com FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE 5 511 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849.120 9:1G805B49.0001120U.Letters1G805849.120 L2 Geologic Hazarda.doc References for Geologic Hazards section: 1. Map Showing Types of Bedrock and Surficial Deposits in the Aspen Quadrangle, by Bruce Bryant, USGS Map 1-785-H, 1972 2: Geologic Map of the Aspen Quadrangle, by Bruce Bryant, ISGS Map GQ 933, 1971 I Map Showing Areas of Selected Potential Geologic Hazards in the Aspen Quadrangle, by Bruce Bryant, 1972 4. Map of Workings of the Aspen Mining District, by D. P. Rohlfing, 1943 FORUM PHI ARCHITECTURE S 811 LAZY CHAIR ROAD,LOT 2 PROJECT NO.GS05849.120 SAW05849.000%120M Leners=09849-120 L2 GeoWgle Has doe RECEIVED ._ . JUL 252014 CITY OF ASPEN 715 West Main Street.Suite 204 �{�{ Aspen,Colorado 81611 C0k [-0P pp7['-,N! P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 511 LAZY CHAIR 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair Aspen,CO 81611 of cot y STEVEN aozlz7 h CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Tuttle Surveying Services J- 727 Blake Ave t Glenwood Springs,CO 81901 J. .L .I. •1, F t F f E t- f t F t _ _ _ _ (970)928-9708 jeff@tss-us.com f f F F F F F F F F <E t = CIVIL E F `` F •� E- F�F� F F F F F t o ^ `\` Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 Aspen,CO 81611 (970)448-7474 RichardG@rfeng.biz �- �` GEOTECH F \` CTL Thompson E E F F F F F E E E E E t E E E t t Ps rc F F F F F F F F F F F F E F E E F F F E E E t E t t t a G F F F F f F F F F F F F F E F E E E STRUCTURAL G F F F F F F E F F E F E F F F E E E E TBD r F F F F F F F F F F F E F E 17 41 41, E 1, E \1 CONTRACTOR Kevin McClure PO Box 6957 Snowmass Village,CO 81615 (970)379 9088 SHEET INDEX KvnMcClura@gmail.c= 7/11=14 DATE OF PUBLICATION Z1-001 COVER Z1-004 RDS COMPLIANCE Zi-002 INDEX OF PRIOR APPROVALS Z1-005 IDEMO SITE PLAN Zl-003 NETLOTAREA 1stAMENDMENT SURVEY SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY CIVIL•COVER 1/6 CIVIL-OFFSITE Z7-011 SITE PLAN Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE 2/6 CIVIL-DRAINAGE BASINS Zi-012 EXTERIOR LIGHTING Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT 3/6 CIVIL-GRADING AND DRAINAGE IZ1.013 EXTERIOR LIGHTING CUTSHEET 4/6 CIVIL-UTILITIES Zi-014 PLAN 5/6 CIVIL-FIRE TRUCK SIM. Z1-015 ELEVATIONS PROJECT NO: 1405 DRAWN BY: SMW 6/6 CIVIL-EROSION CONTROL Z1.Ot6 ELEVATIONS SCOPE OF WORK CERTIFICATION RDS REVIEW1®��n .rV i�j'pf}D �u""jV-� z1•o 7 ELEVATIONS 1, ^ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC L/ The razing of an existing single family residence for construction of a I(Designer/Architect)certify that the information shown here in the'Z Residential Design Standards compliance must be reviewed and new single family residence. Sheets'is correctly and accurately drawn to reflect what is to be approved prior to submission for building permit. PI(�j T7 6 -I constructed in regards to floor area,setbacks,and heights. Y I l e Y !r 511 Lazy Chai r The minor amendment for subdivision was approved by Aspen City Reviewed and Approved for Permit Submission:Council ordinance 12 series 2014 and amendments to the annexation agreement for the Arthur O.Pfister Subdivision Lots 2 8 3. Designer/Architect (1,3A�M,Community Development Department511 Lazy Chair Lot 2, Aspen, CO 81611 The project meets conditions of the Historic Preservation �on � Commission Land Use Application for 8040 Greeep ate:Review, " 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW SHEETTITLE exclusion of disturbance above 8060'elevation,except for utilities, D drainage,and wildfire mitigation. _ BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER 7 CODE EDITIONS:20091RC,2009 IMC.20091ECC,2009 IPC,20091FGC,2011 NEC,CITY OF ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 8 Z 1 -00 1 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM:NEPA 13D(EXISTING TO BE REVISED PER PLANS) SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES 'OVER .IR l' V G Inde or Approvals-2014 Index of Prior Approvals-2014 Index of Pri vals-2014 1 1' V-0" INDEX OF PRIOR APPROVALS Lease Agreement,dated August 16,1982 Reception Number 363275,Plat Book 33,Page 4,Recorded November 15,1993 Reception Number 243707,Book 431,Page 627,Recorded August 25,1982 11 Page) SUBDIVISION:Lot 2,Author O Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption Water Service Agreement.dated July 26,1993 Lease Agreement,dared August 16,1982 Reception Number 363258,Book 730,Page 797,Recorded November 15,1993 1 General Lend Office Patent-August 26,1911 Reception Number 243708,Book 431,Page 628,Recorded August 25,1982(3 Pgs) Reception Number 074888 Book 55 Page 191(1 Page) First Amendment to Water Service Agreement,dated July 26,1993 • Water rights to ditches and reservoirs Agreement,dated August 8,1982 Reception Number 409559,Book XXX,Page>>>,Recorded January 17,1996 • Mineral extraction right Reception Number 243706,Book 431,Page 617,Recorded August 25,1982(10 Pgs) antl Amended Agreement dated January 15,1984 Access Easement Agreement,dated November 19,1993 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Warranty Dead dated November 7,1950 Reception Number 257066,Book 460,Page 373,Recorded February 3,1984(11 Pgs) Reception Number 364074,Book 733,Page 590,Recorded December 2,1993 Aspen,Colorado 81611 Reception Number 097937 Bookl76 Page 79,recorded November 7,1958(1 Page) Tieback Water Tank Site Plato Exemption Plat,dated P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 Platting a September 10;1882 Golf Course Easement Agreement,dated December 8,1993 Correction Deed dated November 7,1958 Reception Number 244234,Plat Book 13,Page 88,Recorded September 17,1982(1 Page) Reception Number 364890,Book 735,Page 400,Recorded December 15,1993 Reception Number 107215,Book 185,Page 486(and in Book 242 Page 369A)(2 Pgs) Tieback Water Tarllt Platting Exemption Plat dated June 6,1983 Resolution Number 94-239 of BOCC,dated December 20,1994 Recorded Plat May 18,1951 Reception Number 250827,Plat Book 15,Page 5,Recorded June 10,1983(1 Page) Reception Number 379407,Book 775,Page 282,Recorded March 2,1995 Reception Number 098360 Plat Book 2A Page 146(1 Page) 511 LAZY CHAIR • Noes,easements,and reci als Agreement,dated January S.TOM Author O.Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption Plat Reception Number 256282,Book 458,Page 752,Recorded January 6,1984(8 Pgs) Reception Number 403369,Plat Book 45,Page 42 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC Agreement dated May 10,1951 Tex Free Exchange Agreement dated December 6,1963 Consent and Ratification of Plat.dated M 30,2008 511 Lazy Chair Reception Number 098388 Book 175 Page 513(21sgs),recorded June 1,1951(2 Pgs) n9 P Reception Number 257085,Back 460,Page 366,Recorded February 3,1984(7 Pgs) Reception Number 550278,Recorded June 18,2008 Aspen,CO$1611 Reception Claim Deed tleted December 459.1989 Dub Claim Deed,dated December 6,1983 Ordinance 34,Series 1996-Maroon Creek Club Subdivision South Pr Reception Number 138379,Book 245,Page 114,recerdetl December 16,1969(2 Pgs) Reception Number 257067,Book 460,Page 384,Recorded February 3,1980(4 (South)Property Annexation,dated pf srY Pgs) August 28,1998 Agreement dated December 19,1969 Reception Number 41985,recorded February 21,1997 Reception Number 138380,Book 245,Page 116,recorded on December 16,1969(3 Pgs) Quit Claim Deed,dated January 19,1984 and re-recortled on August 25,1972 as Reception Number 153537,Bods 288,Page 253(2 Pgs) Reception Number 257132,Book 460,Page 573,Recorded February 6,1984(2 Pgs) An Ordinance of the Aspen Gy Council Growing a Rwwing for the Maroon Creek Subdivision OF COf in Conjunction with Annexation Into the City of Aspen,dated October 28,1996 OR Lease Agreement dated May 1 1967 Duit Claim Deed,dated March 31,1984 Reception Number 403224,Recorded April 8,1997 r.P Yn Reception Number 139294,Book 246,Page 711,recorded February 10,1070(18 Pgs) Reception Number 258682,Book 460,Page 384,Recorded April 11,1984(5 Pgs) STEVEN 'Lt) and Clarification Deed,dated September 12,1988 Maroon Creek Club Subdivision(South)Annexation Plat * WILSON Amended Lease Agreement dated November 27,1969 Reception Number 308906,Book 586,Page 147(3 Pgs) Reception 401571,Plat Book 41,Page 76,Recorded February 6,1997 402127 Reception Number 139295,Book 246,Page 728,Recorded February 10,1970(12 Pgs) • This annexation includes two Out Parcels containing 2.197 saes and 5.840 acres of the U Resolution No.91-111 of BOCC,1041 Environmental Hazard Review,Dated June 11,1991 Maroon Creek Club Subdivision and PUD plot. Deed of Easement dated November 27,1969 Reception Number 336728,Book 657,Page 306,Recorded September 23,1991(21 Pgs) 1'SFARG Reception Number 139298.Book 246,Pegs 740,Recorded February SurveyPlat,dated J 012 D mry 10,1970(6 Pgs) Amendment to Resolution No.91-112 of the BOCC,dated August 7,1991 Encroachment of Golf Tee and Septic Uds Dead of Easement dated November 27,1969 Reception Number 336729,Book 657,Page 384,Recorded September 23,1991 Reception Number 139297,Book 246,Page 748,Recorded February 10,1870(8 Pgs) Easement Deed,dated 2014 Dedication Agreement for Roads,dated August 13,1993 Reception Number ,Book_,Page_,Recorded 2014 Deed of Easement dated November 27,1969 Reception Number 363240,Book 730,Page 662,Recorded November 12,1993 Reception Number 139298,Bods 246,Page 752,Recorded February 10,1970(2 Pgs) Ordinance 12,Series 2014-An ordinance of the city ofAspen City Council approving a Minor CONSULTANTS Access Easement Agreement,dated September 8,1993 Subdivision Amendment and an Amendment to the Annexation Agreement for the Arthur O. SURVEYOR Deed of Easement dated February 2,1970 Reception Number 363255,Book 730,Page 774,Recorded November 12.1993 Pfister Subdivision Lots 2 and 3.City of Aspen,Pitkin County Colorado,Reception Reception Number 139727,Bods 247,Page 424,Recorded March 18,1970(4 Pgs) Number611206 Boor ,Page_,Re=ded=2014 Tuttle Surveying Services Special Warranty Deed,dated November 12,1993 Parcel ID Lot 2:2735-113-02-002 727 Blake Ave Greco of Easement dated October 27,1977 Reception Number 363250,Book 730.Page 793,Recorded November 12,1993 Parcel ID Lot 2:2735113.02.003 Glenwood Springs,CO 81901 Reception Number 199364,Book 338,Page 694,Recorded November 15,1977(4 Pgs) (970)928-9708 Special Warranty Deed,dated November 12,1993 111 Amendment Final Plat Second Amendment to Lease,dated November 14,1977 Reception Number 363257,Book 730,Page 793,Recorded November 12,1993 jell@use-us.com Reception Number 199510,Boot 338,Page 994,Recorded November 19,1977(4 Pgs) Lot Lira Adjustment Plat,dated August 13,1993 CIVIL Reception Claim Deed,dated August k 1962 Reception Number 363254,Plat Book 33,Page 3,Retarded November 12,1993 Roaring Fork Engineering Reception Number 243705,Book 431,Pegs 614,Recorded August 25,1982(3 Pgs) 9 9 9 PO Box Final Subdivision Plat 8 PUD for Maroon Creek Club Aspen,CO 81611 (970)448-7474 RichardG@rfeng.biz GEOTECH CTL Thompson I RECEPTIDN#:81120e,06111112014R014 at STRUCTURAL 1:11:08:13:06M, P TBD 1 Of-,R$26,00 Doc Cove ORDINANCE Janine K.via*Caudill,Piston County,CO ORDINANCE N0.t2 WHEREAS,the Aspen(:iy Council finds that this ordinance I'unh.:rs and is necessary for dale of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section (SERIFS OF 2014) the Promotion ofpuhllc health,safety,and welfare. The subdivision plat shall contain a note prohibiting development below the gulf can path on for 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI'T'Y OF ASPEN(-11'1•COUNCIL APPROVING A MINOR NOW,TBERF.FORE,HE 1'1.ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF I'III..CI'I'1' 3,except as m-nable necessary for utility influstructum.stoma water mitigation,maintenance Constitution and the Aspen Ilome Rule Charter, SUBDIVISION AMENDNIF.NT AND AN AMENDMEN'I'1'01'HE ANNEXA TION OF ASPEN,COLORADO.as follows: orrestoration ofnative land,cape,and wildfire mitig.fin needs. Section 6: CONTRACTOR A(:REEMF.N"I'FOR THE ARTHUR O.PFISTER SUBDIVISION LOan IS 2 AND 3,CITY An undmem 1.the Arthur O.Pfister SubdivWon Exemption.1-,2 and 3,and an amendment Section 3:%ovine May CorrectionThis Ordinance shall not aHec[any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of Kevin McClure OF ASPEN,PITKIN COUNTY,COLORADO. to the derelopmem pnwkio.,of the water service agr navro for the I.e.arc hereby approved 'Ihe Community Development Director shall cause the Offend Zone District map to reflect Lots any action or proceeding now pending under or by vinue of the ordinances repealed or amended PO Box 6957 with the following conditions of approval: 1.2,and 3 of the Pfister Subdivision as located in the Rural Residential(RR)Zone District as herein provided,and the surae shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Snowmass Village,CO 81615 Parcel ID Lot 2:1735-113-01-001 without a Planned Development Overlay.'Ihc coup incorrect))indicates this ovcf.l. Parol 11)Lot 1:1735-/11-01-003 Section I:Applieabilih of Cite Deretopment Requirement, (970)379 9088 Section 7: 'Ihc allowances and limitations for the developmentalof Lots 2:cod 3 approved by Pitkin Cuunry� Section 4:Reamematiom Pres-ed If any section,subsection,sentence,clause,phrase,or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason KvnMcClure @9mail.eom WHEREAS,the Community De-opmem Department rcecivwi an application for the and contained within City of Aspen Ordinance No.40.Series 19%;the provisions of the water All material representations and commitments mule by the Applicant pursuant to the held invalid or unconstitutional in a coon of competent jurisdiction,such portion shall be properties known as Lots 2 and 3.Anhar O.Pfister Subdivision Exemption.located at 511 Lazy service agreement related to development allowances and limitations; the subdivision plat develo ( sal a als as herein awarded,whether in public hesrin documentation deemed a u Chair Lane;Aspen.Colorado,from owners Lazy Chair lAt 2.LLC;and.Luz)Chair Lot 3,I.I.C. pp ed by Pitkin Count)and recorded at Book 42 Page 45;and.precious land use approvals peen om the Bono, pu g or rem separate,distinct veld independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the 7nlrzou DATE OF PI10uGT10N led by Stecr Wilson of Forum Phi Architects;and. granted b Pitkin County including all Findin interpretation,and amendments shall be presented din the Community Development 1,and he m the Aspen Ciy lied with arc hereby wining portions thereof. represented gran c y g s� �orpnmteJ in such plan development approvals and the s:rmr shall be complied with us if I'ullr I nsidercd voided upon recordation of the Subdivision Amendment Plat. ser forth herein,unless amended by others f conditions. Section WHEREAS,the application oaks to amen)the SubJicision approval granted by Pitkin eO Peci a son on County prior to annexation of the propeny into the City of Aspen and amend the annexation That the City Clerk is directed,upon the adoption of this Or4yapce,m record a copy of this agreementpen. development Lots 2 and 3 shall remain subdivided lots within the City of Aspen,each with one development with the Cit)of As bath of which set limb certain d.velu t allowances and Section el Vested R{ahD Ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder, rcerictiuns;and, right,and shall allow development in nnnrdance with the City of,Upon development The derciopmem approvals granted herein shall constiwte a site-spnilic bcvclopmenl plan,rsid - ullow•atees and lim%lions including.but not limited to.the City of Aspen Land Use Code,the for a +d of three(3 f m the date u1 issuance of a dreelu mein order. lloweveq any \VIIFNt:AS,the progenies wen annexed into the(:it)01'Aspen by the adoption of Rural Residential IRR)zone district as may be amended from(line to time or as the property poria )years p Sertion9: a k• failure to abide b)any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the A public hearing on the Ordinance was held on the 27n day of ay.2014,at 5:00 in the City Ordinance 34,Series 199(1,which ordinance accepted ccnain development allowances and v be otherwise rezoned m another district,the Urban Runoff Management flan,and forfeiture of said vested n'rights.Unless otherwise c,em ted or extended,failure to Council Chambers,Cil hall,130 South Galena Street,Aspen Colorado,fifteen(IS)days to rcunction.Placed on the prupany by Prkm Count):and applicable building and fire axile,. propertyP Y Pe Y Prior WHEREAS,the properties were also subject of u Water S.nice A memem with the properly submit all plats and agreements required to be rcgNcd,as specified herein,within one which heating a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation to 1 6 year of the effective dale of the development order shall also result in the holiiwn of said within the City of Aspen. City of As (un exhibit to Ordinance Jt),Series 1994)which agreement specified remain 1'he provisions u(the water service agreement and the City's standards and rcyuiremrnt, pulpa y b development b Aspen greemcn gni vested •n'rights and shall render the develo t order,oid within the meaning of Section Z 7/11114 8040 GREENLINE development allowances and restrierimu:and, remaining m the delivery of Polabie water to the proper ies shall be unaffected be this Ordinance. 26,104.050(Void permits). Zoning that is not pan of rhe approved site-specific development 1{ 20• Sec on. Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.480.090. Cin Council cony approve minorLot 2 shall be subject to an 80,10 Gmcnline•Review,pursuant to Chapter 26.435 of the City's plan shall not result in the creation of a wrsred property right. This ordinance shall become effntive thin)(30)days following final adoption. amendments to an existing subdivision approval;and, Land Use Code as said Chapter may he amended from time to time.Lot 3 is not within the 8040 No later than fourteen(14)dans loll-ing Tirol approval nI all requisite•reviews nccess r)'to obtain WHEREAS,pursuuni to Section 26.304,the City Council may amend the provisions of a Gmenline arca and is of subject to this review. a development order as set forth in this Ordinance,the Cir'Clerk shall cai u to be published in a INTRODUCED,READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law,by the City PROJECT NO: 1405 previously ad,fa d owliqunce.specifically Ordinance No.40,Series 1996:and. .cvspaPer ofgcmral cimulmion,vi(bin the jurisdictional MmnJaries of the City of Aspen.anmice Council o(Ihe City of Aspen on the 12"day ofMay.2014. WHEREAS,the Community Decclopment Department received referral comments from 'Ihc developer of both lots shall work with the City of Aspen Parks Department to minimize advising the neral public of the a 1 of u sites fic develo t len and creation ut a DRAWN BY: SMW disturbance to native vegetation and prune groupings o(the native Gambrel Oak. b ge pu p itle. peci pmcn p City Engin«ring.Building Department.Lir•Prulcetion District.Pucks Mpanmrnt.and City xestd pmpeny right pursuant to this'1fide.Such notice shall be.substantialh in the lidlow ing tome An Utilities as a result of the Development Review Commiuce matting:and, Section 2:Plat FBI- Notice is hereby to the ncrul public of the 1 of a sites specific development COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC WHEREAS,the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered flu Jevclopnent Pursuant to Chapter 26.490-Approval Documents.the record owners of Lots 2 and 3 shall 'given ge Pu panne pof pmcn krk � �. Proposal under de applicable provisions o(the AtamiciPal Cuele as idcnclid herein.armed a duly d submit a Subdivision.\mendmem Plat(u be reviewed to rnsurc each item and Plan,and the creation of a vested progeny nigh(,valid f r u period of three(3))cars. Linda Ma..I..City Ck S even S drop,May noticed public hearing,considered Ihc,\pplication,r«riexd presentation from the Applicant. prelate an pursuant to the IanJ Use Code al the City'ul Aspen proit p ii 24,snide 68.Colorado tto the condition of upprovul is documented w the sari{action of the Community Ucrdopment Revised Statutes.pertaining m the tbllowin•descritxd ny:Aim Amendment in the considered the comments and rr uncnJations of the Communi(r Derelopmcn(Director, Director.the City Login-and the City Attorney prior to final signatures by the Mayor and b F Lots FINALLY,adopted,passed and approvd this 27a day of May,2014. considered comments and recommendations from other members al City stag'and r•I'rrral recordation.A Development Agmemna is not needed. Anhur O.Foister Pully De fully J scribe Subdivision Lots 2 and 3.City of Aspen.Pitkin agencies,considered comments and suggestions olllred by members of the public.considered County Colorado,as more fully described in City of Aspen Cin Council Ordinance No. A t; fry J� question rsponses by stall'and the Applicant,considered comments and discussion by fella`+' sc The SubJirisiun AmenJmem Plat shall gram a peryriwl 30-fwt wile areas eaumem through __.Series 2014. _ I} Council members:and. Lot 3 for the purposes of providing adequate access to Lot 2. The easement slxdl be genemll) Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subseyuenl reviews and 0fide Manning, iry Clerk Steve.Skn ran,Mayor WIIEREAS,the Aspen City Council TinJ,Thal Ihc development proposal with certain along the aligmne-it'dic-tatiag driveway. approvals required by this approval of the general rules,regulations and ordinances or the City of conditions amehed meeu or exceeds all applicable development standards uI all applicable land use Aspen provided that such..views and appro%a]x urs not inconsistent with this approval. Approved as to farm: reviews as identified herein;and. The subdivision plat shall contain a note prohibiting development above the 8060-foot Aviation line on Lot 2,except as reasonable necessary I'or utility infrastructure,stoma water mitigation. 'Ihc approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights ofreferendum and judicial m%cw:the �_ R. SHEET TITLE maintenance or rstaratiun of native landxape•,and wildfire mitigation needs period of time milled by law for the exercise uI'such right,shall not h to con until the Ordia.-Na.12,Serk,2014. pa' b 8+n / me R.Trove,Ciy Attorney ahJinance Na.r?,Scrin_'OIJ. ()rdinuace\'o.l_',5rric,2011. O,di-No.12.Series 2014. -002 0 0/� Paye 1 ul J Pape_'.1 J Yage 3 of J Page 4 of JL) INDEX OF PRIOR APPROVALS 715 West Main Street.Sude 204 Aspen,Cobrado 81611 P 970.279 4157 F 866 770 5585 511 LAZY CHAIR 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair Aspen,CO 81611 Zoning Allowance&Project Summary Project Name Family I Now construction P�OF CO<OH PWOBI y 0 M`11302002 STEVEN * WILSON Zione Dell IRR 402127 ti r U Allowed Iatsad RoOos•d cF,(,Sep AaOa� FnN WA WA WA 3Dft WA 26.710A3oD R•ar A WA WA Wit WA 6.710.130.D �ombhred Front/Raar MA WA A 50R WA 26.710.13eD ice. WA WA INIA 2(fR WA 6.710.130.1) CONSULTANTS Combined Side WA WA A 40ft WA 6.710.130.1) Distance betvneri Build A WA WA WA WA 6.710.130.D SURVEYOR orner Lot A WA N/A WA WA 26.710.130.1) Tuttle Surveying Services 727 Blake Ave 1 t3raakdows tele Glenwood Springs.CO 81901 wpierverife (970)928-9708 Net Lessabler—in SG FT A WA WA 6.710.130.13 Teff@tss-us wm Open Space% No Wrament NoRequirement No Gement 6.710A30.D Sine Covera WA WA WA8.710.130.D CIVIL nSita Parking 12 Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 Of Sib coaram Ralarartea Aslan,CO 81611 Pie (970)448-7474 rose Lot Are. k6.710A30.D RichardG@rfengbiz A==d Buildin Foq t ft) WA WA .710.130.D site covere "!F-"t A IMA .710.130,D GEOTECH CTL Thompson nrafartlN Devellawners RWM(MR Received TDR Certificate Sent TDR Cenlficate Transferred TDR Certificate STRUCTURAL vrt. vrtta TBD Lantl $3,450,000 Pitkin Coun Apessor Improvements $265,800 1pkldn Coin Assessor Total $3,715,800 PRldn County AMaMer CONTRACTOR Ke—McClure PO Box 6957 Net Lot Area Snow- ass Village.CO 81615 Project Name (970)379 9088 KvnMcClum@gmall corn Zone ttatat 7/11/2014 DATE OF PUBLICATION Min.Gras Lot Area r RR) 12 Acres 8.710.130 Min.Net Lot Area r RR) 12 Acres 8.710.130 R4a M 104,897.56 R Reductloro far eros wkh slopes 0%-20%(100%of poral area to be urvey included in Net Lot Area) 29.017.65 x 100%=29,017.65$Q R 6.575.020-1 Reductions for area with atopy 20%-30%(50%of parcel area to be Sunivy included in Net LM Area) 53,554.50 x 50%=26,722.75 ag It 6.575.020.1 Reductions for area with sops greater than 30%(0%of parcel ars to be Survey included in Net Lot Area) 22.025.41 x 0%=0 soft 26575020.1 Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENUNE ohl Ana Raductlorm 29,017.86.25,72275-0-65,74OA0 flat R Z 3128/14 PLAT AMENDMENT Let Arae 55.74040 q R PROJECT NO: 1405 DRAWN BY: SMW Allowable Floor Area Project Name COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC bwWN Floor Ana 55.740.40-50.000=5.740.40 Per RR,Use R-15 Code for debrmining Allowable Mor area.R-5,7404 1100-57.40 15 Code Lots with 50,000.aq R.6.600 square feet of floor 57.40 x 2-114.90 area plus 2 with feel of Mor area for eech additional 100 6,600.114.8=6,714.8 .710.130.D.10 Raters ing ere feet in Net Lot Ana. Allowable Floor Area=6714.8 26.71Do50D.10 No unique appro.l. SHEET TITLE allem" Z 1 -003 No vannas First N 250 xt251 .xem°` NET LOT AREA m Exem Mn Naxt 251-500 ft is 50%exempt .7 able 26.575.020.0 Dock Exemption a oxienript up to 15%of the allowable FAR 6714.5 x.15.1007.22 R .575.020.D 4 'r dfaroon Creek Club _ Golf Course F-Z4-z P1,4 FV _77 -z4ff-Z-,1VDJfZ-1 OF TIILT ARTHUR O. PFIST�R FULLY DZtYL'LOPL'D LANDS SUBDIVISION LNL'1LIPTION i 511 LAZY CHAIR DRIVE, ASPL'N COLORADO, 81611 o � CITY OF ASPL'1V. COUNTY OF PITIIIN, STAT OF COLORADO THE' PURPOSE' OF THIS PLAT IS TO AWRMP AND UPDATE' 0ZVFL0PftfE1VF ALLOWANCES AND RTSTRICT101VS FOR LOTS 2 AND 3 OF THIS SUBDIVISION TO CONFORJf TO CITY OF ASPEN ORDINANCE' 1,2, SERIF'S 2014( ~' LEGEND AND NOTES: CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP h' �',.• - s INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: 8 1�� -• INDICATES SET NO.5 REBAR k CAP MARKED LS 33638 THAT THE UNDERSIGNED BEING SOLE OWNERS IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: j� - DATE OF SURVEY: MARCH,2014. LOT 2 8 LOT 3,ARTHUR 0.PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBMSION EXEMPTION 41 yL/ ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 42 AT PAGE 45 •NV9 `p1Y 8 - SAID PARCEL IS ENTIRELY WITHIN'ZONE X: AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE OF 500 YEAR 1.' FLOOD PLAIN'PER FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP,PANEL 203 OF 325. N Arra - LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CONTAINING 2.4 ACRES AND 2.0 ACRES RESPECTIVELY,MORE OR LESS,HAVE CAUSED THE DESCRIBED d ie�eW LOTS 2 do 3 OF THE ARTHUR O.PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTIO REAL PROPERTY TO FU SURVEYED,LAID OUT AND PLATTED CE SHOWN ON THIS • lA1w� ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOT(42 AT PAGE 45,PITKIN COUNTY,CO. CAR ITY OF 0.P N.C FULLY PITKI ED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION,511 LAZY CHAIR DRIVE,ASPEN CO 81611 onv - BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON A NO.5 REBAR WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S.9184 FOUND CITY OF ASPEN.COUNTY OF PITKIN,STATE OF COLORADO ��1 •amu AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 3 OF SAID FINAL PLAT AND AT THE WESTERLY ANGLE V � v POINT OF SAID LOT 3 ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SUBJECT LOT 2. IN WITNESS WHEREOF SAID OWNER(S)HAS CAUSED HIS NAME TO BE HEREUNTO SUBSCRIBED THIS DAY OF__ A.O.2011 Y THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REPRESENT A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR TO DISCOVER EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD.ALL INFORMATION BY: �fp Farad ARA s R 1 PERTAINING TO OWNERSHIP,EASEMENTS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD HAS BEEN TAKEN at)'Mew Ab"t FROM TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN. I � LS#V/A4 •. ' LLC.DATED EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 2,2012 AS COMMITMENT NO.FILE NO.PC12003032. STA7E OF �- .0,W le ami s_ tz �ss. 4s CIX/N7Y OF) ee'W wN a•.' �QaO• �11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR APPROVA_I The foregoing document was acknowledged Da/ore me this day o/ 2014, by THIS THE AMENDED FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 2 h 3,ARTHUR O.POSTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS N17N£SS m hood end officio/sea/ (1 ,� III,orururvtors SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION,511 LAZY CHAIR DRIVE,ASPEN CO 81611,CITY OF ASPEN.COUNTY OF PITKIN, Y Cy„ STATE OF COLORADO REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE BY THE CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR !� I THIS DAY OF 2014.TO THE E%EN DETE TENT THAT ANYTHING IN THIS PLAT IS WITH ANY CITY OF A INCONSISTANT OR IN CONFLICT ASPEN ORDERS RELATING TO THIS PLAT APPROVAL CERTIFICA PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE LAW,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OTHER 1 APPLICABLE LAND USE REGULATIONS AND BUILDING CODES,SUCH OTHER DEVELOPMENT ORDERS OR THIS AMENDED PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE MAROON CREEK CLUB ,2.00 AT cres APPLICABLE LAWS SHALL CONTOL IN WITNESS WHEREOF THIS DAY OF A.D.2014. BY: `O ti REPRESENTATIVE P1 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR STA IE OF 1 1 J 9S COUNTY OF —) Found Na Re a ba 1 CITY ENGINEER: .M/ilhw PA.,&Lm LS W84 138• THIS PLAT WAS RENEWED FOR THE DEPICTION OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SURVEY REQUIREMENTS. The foregoing document was acknowledged before me this THIS—DAY.OF OF 20— day o/_ 2014,by UMTNESS my hard and official sea/ CITY ENGINEER TITLE CERTIFICATE: PLAT: SCALE IA = 50' SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1, AN ATTORNEY LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OF COLORADO,OR AGENT AUTHORIZED BY A TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,DO HEREBY I,JEFFREY ALLEN 7U77LE,DO HEREBY CERTIFY THATI AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND CERTIFY THATI HAVE EXAMINED THE TITLE TO ALL LANDS SHOWN UPON THIS PLAT AND THAT TITLE TO SUCH LANDS IS VESTEED IN SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAYS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,THAT THIS PLAT IS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL VICINITY AfAP.• SCALAF > = 1000' A TRUE,CORRECT AND COMPLETE PLAT OF THE AMENDED FINAL PLAT OF LOTS 2 6'" LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES(INCLUDING MORTGAGES,DEEDS OF TRUST,JUDGMENTS, ,W ARTHUR 0.PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION,511 LAZY CHAIR DRIVE, EASEMENTS,CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING 7k REAL PROPERTY ASPEN,CO 81611,CITY OF ASPEN.COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO,AS UID OUT, IN MIS PLAT).EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: PLATTED.DEDICATED AND SHOWN HEREON,THAT SUCH PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN �1 •� P R ACCURATE CONTROL SURVEY OF SAID PROPERTY BY ME,OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN THE FIELD WHICH BALANCED AND CLOSED WITHIN A LIMIT OF 1 IN 15000(WHICH •� v COMPLIES WITH COLORADO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ALTA/ACS M LAND TITLE U I .I .1• ',, 2737 I .S•I•I•LT.-• ♦' SURVEYS)AND CORRECTLY SHOWS THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS O THE LOTS, DATED THIS DAY O' A.D.,2013. '� ll i •-• EASEMENTS AND STREETS AS THE SAME ARE STAKED UPON THE GROUND IN COMPLIANCE i<a,46y a .� ` N1TH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND. TITLE COMPANY: �� V•°• rc jt r �,r IN WITNESS WHEREOF,1 HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS DAY OF A.Q.2014. AGENT R PIJrMF �ya,nVK` •1 1S •1$ YI. �Y m- At moo" �r •'( JEFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE,P.L.S.#33638 OR a.t, rt. L 1 ATTORNEY f e$ + COLORADO ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NO. �f. '}. S �� ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL — _ cf�p l y `•` I t ��"!?c ..+cc4F r1 �•� ' i = N07E5: THIS IST AMENDMENT FINAL PLAT OF THE ARTHUR 0.PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION "a Vj, ( �� t<,Yf 1)RUN WITH THE LAND. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PLAT AND THE OBLIGATIONS CREATED HEREUNDER SHALL BURDEN EXEMPTION WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL ON THE AS ORDINANCE NO.—SERIES OF_AND RECORDED IN THE OFFICE �. J•,' ) ,ry Q pr';.- AND RUN WITH THE PROPERTY. THE PLAT SHALL BIND,BE CHARGED UPON AND INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF ANYONE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY,COLORADO AS RECEPTION NO. THE tl ACQUIRING OR OWNING AN INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY AND THEIR RESPECTIVE GRANTEES,SUCCESSORS,HEIRS, DEDICATIONS AND EASEMENTS 70 THE CITY OF ASPEN AS SHOWN HEREIN ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. 41 L S�� vp •I, IIIa EXECUTORS,ADMINISTRATORS,DEVISES,AND/OR ASSIGNS. OR*aad Record's } SIGNED THIS AY OF 2014 1 } Y4/�. f;1� , j ��, �a+•�• ( } fiis Plot is accepted for Hing in the Office of the Clefs and Recorder o/Pitkin County, Colorodo, this_day o/ 2014, Plot Book , on Page STEVEN SKADRON,MAYOR and Reception no. LINDA MANNING,CITY CLERK Br Clerk and Recorder NW�sv TIITTLAR SIJR1'BYINC SE'RVICE'S >,S7' A�I�ND�1�NT 5>> LAZY CHAIR DRIYZ; 727 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 aruwn „se..y a�„»,,....�•d..er.�Am•�m r.� (970) 928-9708 (FAX 947-9007) FINAL PLAT ASP�'N CO 816'11 �t.oe/2s�2o�4 rrw,..o,. sr. rA.c.r�lncw.on•Aoum dmail-jef.1W;ss-us.Com OF I law HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHY 0 1Llaroon Creek Club LOT 2, FINAL PLAT OF THE Golf' Course ARTHUR 0. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION - /roicates slopes of 0-20X(no hatching)29017.65 S.F., AREA 28.98 AS RECORDED ON APRIL 14, 1997 IN (moo - Indicates slopes of 2OX--JOX(Dots)5J,554,50 SF., AREA 51-2X ThPLAT BOOK 42 A T PAGE 45 V — Indicates slopes of JOX and greater(Dashed) 2041 SF., AREA 19.9X - nils/mprovemenf Survey was performed in Marchrch,, 2014. IN THE OFFICES OF THE PI TKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER — 7h/B area/s/n Ione X(area outside of 500 year flood plaln)per COUNTY OF Pl TKIN STA TE OF COL ORAD 0 FIRM OW097CO20JC dated,Arne 04, 1987. T . - Due to snow cater of time of surrey some improvements and topogmphkol features tcaaw Ann,volcr ' may not be shown, some of the site detail has been taken from previous surveys. is 61IDAZINS FOUMO MOAX ENT AS LESGW'BEO T ' `� 1' _ GRAPHIC SCALE - • acvcarzs sEr vas ESAN s cAv rAerm cs xTwB ,�\\ \\\\\\ \ S 7727' 7LINE TABLE - CAFE err SURWr`JAY 14 10012 �\ 275 " r0 1Q0 LINE LENGTH BEARING j� o \ \ \\ \ \ \\ �� _-_ —E 335 0p, • L1 0 D9 N55 3'00 - sFARN4S ARE BASED Ceri A Ma 3 REBAr wrN A E LOW PUS A7 CAP LS e�mina Ar me \ \ \ \ \ \\ t , \ (w ran') � 7WAs Y0 4VAER OF SAC OPI.IT AA»AT TAE RES2%Y A�E x01 cr ser car J ALSO ++ I.inch m 80 fl CURVE TABLE W&C A BL4167eG a'N ON SP'4e'WYNE&71E'7100 CES'OUSED MWAIASV7S \ \\�\ ��� CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD CHORD BEARING DELTA TANGENT _ n2s PROPERTY Al STB,ECr m EASDAW7S Hans Or WAY AND/OR BEOWEMOYn As neem aR SNowR M p`Cp .,• oop, C1 92.95 215.00 92.23 N63'43'07"W 24'46'14" 47.21 nME AE1:raos a<nc wnaN cccw/r aEwc AND RE'OfwNER. \ ' liC2 79.28 345.00 79.11 577'55'00"E 13'09'59" 39.82 _ an,pr A39EY ZOWI AR MURAL AE5AFX71AO .r rl C3 30.60 185.76 127.93 N75'21'32" 40'76'56" 68.13 _ Ira SLtetrr OOFT AR7T REPAMENT A CAE'SEMROY Br sa SLRWYDR 70 DEMWW OWWWAP OR 7o O N +_ t \ g \'x\i\,�,:� + -\ , \3 �1 r.1 C4 254.10 250.00 243.30 N26'05'56"E 58'14'08' 139.25 asmMm E S997V7s OR 07h"avcc�AAaS u',a'mm.ALL xrn 79W PERrAawo m OWVMW,, \�dCCC�+"`` -AAmENTS oe Ondm ENbu�ANas o`RECORD HAS�v rAnnv nwu A D77c auao7Morr uwED BY \ Ap'ptOxl ate Ara \ ATTOMEYS 017E a7AWIrYAW,,Me,DHaD JNE2Z 2012 mw7luovr Na Pa2aWTl Diatuarlae nos vrra tx7r is weccr 7a tNe FatowDva Eravnays am ser/a 771tE:awMi7ME7vr. �7 �` \, \ \ 11�� <\\! }4\1� \ \,\'1 •':� kF' `• , +\ +\ \ ��\ ��1- \ -�+ 1 \,. 7.Rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights and right of theproprietor 9 9 9 e of a win a lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom,should the same be found to penetrate or 11,'1` intersect the premises as reserved in the United States;Patent dated April 3,1896,and recorded \r I � \` \r,^ \ August 26,1911,in Book 55 at Page 191,as Reception No.074888. r / \ 1 } 1 a- e 1 _ 8.Terme,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed doted `\\\\� `` \ ,,_1 r I I + a \\�\ j ,/ 11 \. _\- \ ! 1i r November 7.1950,and recorded November 15,7950, in Book 176 at Page 79, as Reception No. \ o ,�11}}��-- 1 097937,and Correction Deed dated November 7,1958,and recorded November 10,1958,In Book `\` ��as 185 at Page 486,as Reception No.107215,and in Book 242 at Page 369A. �+ % �1 P{ -� tS�, 9.Any and all notes,easements and recitols as disclosed on the recorded plat recorded May 18,1951,In '.l' _ 1, \���':?\ \\� „i \\� \.. .1 t�I I j I T 1 ,I \ I wii,.r Plat Book 2A at Page 146,as Reception No.098360. ��° �_�\ \1 :GamblB,_0 k \ 10.Terme,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated May °�^�� Trea 1ip;c•'\ .,� J\_� I i J '\ O' 10,1951,and recorded June 1, 1851.in Book 175 at Page 513 as Reception No.098386,and Quit 'P' 1 palm Deed dated December 19,1969,and recorded December 19,1969,In-Book 245 at Page 114,as +\A. .��*.� y04b2 I l L.r_w�! \Vn, Receptlan No. 138379,and Agreement dated December 19, 1969,and retarded December 19,1969, �pOW t -r L { in Book 245 at Page 116,as Reception No.138380,and re-recorded August 25,,1972, in Book 266 at UG' x� r 8p 1 I.' I-Il) I' '_` Pager 253.ere Reception No.753537. „;,`r.-`Id r rl I-- v 1,,, t .i- I � I 11.Terme,wnditlona,proNalone,agreements and obligations apeciRed under the Lease dated May 1, 1967,and recorded February 10,1970.in Book 246 at Page rolled No.139294,and Amendment to Leoae dated November 27,1969,In Book 246'at Page 728,as Reception No. 139295. 12.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligationa specified under the Deed of Easement ' 5j72)' �� era\ y I11� ._,"_- I I t Ir, l I - �-IJ dated November 27, 1969,and recorded February 10,1970. In:Book 246 at Page 740,as Reception 55"E -\ \ v v �; _ 70 00n '• ',. w vk,cy r, , No.139296. 80l�("rejyr •� 13.Terme,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement "�•:A�-' _ - i:� I '_I _ doted November 27;1969,and recorded February 10,1970,In iBook 246 at Page 748,as Reception \, No.139297,and Dead of Easement dated November 28,1969,In Book 246 at Page 752,as Reception No.139298. A V 1 Y � .:� l, .� I! i !r V - C� y. •}__,_. 14.Tome,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Deed of Easement O �'i� �\ A V: -� :�: a �,� t t.�'.� �:I; }:'r t I !1/ a9 ; (5 'i�'i.�V• dated February 2,1970,and recorded March 18,1970,in Book 247 at Page 424,as Reception No. i 1 \... V A 8 P IIS \ _, - 139727. �� }f }{{ '� C :�' r !' St-' �r^- y• o Na `- 15.Terms,conditions, rovisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Grant of Easement \� \ Y •.,i % I I t I 4 �9R.' �71 TF,._.... P 9 P I aY a4 \ o-J 7't.. _ Naked October 27,1977,and recorded November 15,1977,in Book 338 at Page 694,as Reception i 4. D C, \> .� No.199384. ., t .l_ I "}•I � a.�gQ i6.Terms.conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations\ c \ :., \'�\ o \ \ •` Ii6frf r `r I r(- A _ ^v ` - U;, P 9 9 specified under the Second Amendment to .. $ _ .� '��•L ¢ c Lease dated November 14,1977,and recorded November 18,1977,'M Book 338 at Page 994,as C7 Reception No, 199510. I�,I, r \ e r ,y gip JJ 0'( 17.Terms,conditions,ProNsions,agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated I !f g and recorded August 25, 1982,in Book 431 at Page 674,as Reception No.243705. u, �^ n�i1 \"`0— �k' . 542 August 8.1962 ON \;._�.\ �. \ \+(..` \1'.c...ri). 18.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Lease Agreement dated >\ \., ` . \\ ,\.' �,; V.14.(,':�\ \ •\ I August 8,1982,and recorded August 25, 1982,in Book 437 at Page 627,as Reception No. 243707. ,,1 '✓ t 11,,1.r tr _ 19.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Lease Agreement dated \ `:'�\, ` -\ �'\'.r ' \,\ +\\ 1 t I I,.. !'. I r� ; SITE P lookr" August 16,1982,and recorded August 25,1982,in Book 431 at Page 628,as Reception No. 243708. \ ); 0\ \ +,�\ �. -!}i 1 - ;I" N ;I 20.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement doted Csalle C t \ + \.�.. � I 1 I �� tg��y :}' 7 I �l af^ August 8,1982,and recorded August 25, 1982.in Book 431 at Poe 617,as Reception No. 243706, \\,, \\ \'\ \�\ \l \:�� _ 11�•1 1 I;.'. �0 '+y imYqq' 9 9 9 P \\ \.,,. \ .!_,,,\ .�. '...1 �.�,L_ _ .. .. I r_ 'I shy, ''¢`[" •�Lj and Amended Agreement doted January 15,1984,and recorded February 3,7984,In Book 460 at 1 \. i.r: \... \ \` t _. t t� ',m app/. 3d '3 .. Page 373,as Reception No.257066. .+ \ `:.�N -�},.:_�`..� \\ '�.+, ',-` I 1 ,;': f t l�� -!, ! MAROON REEK Hyy4,S i .mNxX,OarBsn • r oa v 21.Any and all notes,easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Tinhock Water Tank Sita \ N \ " \` \ r 4 - 1 1. f Platting Exemption Plat,recorded September 17,1982,in Plat Book 13 at Page 88,as Reception No. / ���, •..\\ \\\' \\ \\-\ p I 1 I �_ =--� .!1 i•.1 244234,and the Tieback Water Tank Site Platting Exemption Plat dated June 6,1983,and recorded June 10,1983, In Plat Book 15 at Page 5,as Reception No.250827. 22.Terme,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated LEGEND NTT \ '\�,. \ \ \ c\r`1.�i 4��` 1 )�I 1+ i y,...I' - I .1 0 _ Januar 5,7984.and recorded Januar 6,7984,(n Book 458 at Pae 752,as R 27° i I 1 I{ I {(I I r .}',.. r)_ I -o ( ,r �`�. y Y g Reception No. 256282. 55t1 m / I x .� f 23.Terms,conditions,Provision.,agreements and obligations specified under the Tax Free Exchange oax 26 - �. 1 a N I' 4 !y;+< ,� o; s go. .91 �t Agreement dated December 6,1983,and recorded February 3,1984,'dn Book 460 at Page 366,as I Q�0 / N r Itt:i;., I t .1:1 i Nom.U }.; 9rpLi, .-i :;�d197 r / ;.�";' a Z Reception No.257065. © Dae APPk +'.i. I ( � N N. ^�- Off'.�(j� �! 'y, 'o o• �` 24.Terme,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated 1 n .. 1'7/ ( . .Jb76� i4�!+, 1G4_ 1-9✓.Y' 257mber 6,1983,and recorded February 3, 1984,in Book 460 at Page 384,as Reception No. IPine Tee Found No. 5 Rebof ' yrs AVOW~1g7E. 25.Terms,conditions,provialons,agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated I with Yellow Plastic (.�O January 19,1984,and recorded February 6,1984,in Book 460 at Page 573,as Reception No. Aspen T1s. f I - MSTOWCAL GRAAF OAS aFIERSOM BY PROEcIM GRADE OF 257132. car7o,.wood'rree L.S. #9184 pp 33 3 An9TCaMA 7E LwMiSRA�6D AAEA. 26.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated NA W68£(E✓. 8027.941 /n"A March 31,1984,and recorded April 11,1984,In Book 464 at Page 421,as Reception No.258682,and reepham Pedewai ,n of � Clarification Deed dated September 12,1988,and recorded February 17,1989,in Book 586 of Page 147,as Reception No. 308906. 27.Terns,canditione,prodslons,agreements and obligations specified under the Dedication Agreement i Nmtr Linn p7Y QL'ASPEN j - for Roads dated August 13,1993,and recorded November 12,9993,In Book 730 at Page 662,as 0 D eroVerOR's� �h., Reception No.363240. _ I weler von:. GPS-14 n,, 28.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements end obligation.specified under the Access Easement (7 I,JEHREY ALLEN NTiLE,SIONO A PROFESSIONAL LARD SURVEYat N 11@ STATE Agreement dated September 8,1993,and recorded November 12,1993.In Book 730 at Page 774,as r —Eleo- E4n.m n',,. aF wLDRAoo,1H75 aIPROVEMENT SURVEY WAs PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL Reception No.363255. -a MONUYEITED LAND SURVEY aF THE PRaPFRTV CORNER MONUIENTS,80TH 29.Terns,conditions, proYsions,agreements and obligaUons specified under the Special Warranty Deed ,! -Gos- coa NNs , : FOUND AND SET,UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND CHECgN6Q 7HAT R IS dated November 12,1993,and recorded November 12,1993,in Book 730 at Pae 747,as Reception Ir OORRECT TO THE BE4T OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE AND THAT ALL 9 P Nine:A!1 Teas are ambtl to nl 1 N DBIEN.40NS BOTH LINEAR AND ANOAM WERE DETERMINED BY AN ACCURATE No.363250. n 7'"'"°`""'°" CONTROL SURVEY IN THE FIELD WHICH BALANCED AND CLOSED WITHIN A UMr OF 30.Terns,conditions, provisions,a regiments and obligations opp.cr:imate d.b,s'..e R m 'g g specified under the Spacial Warranty Deed 1 N 1SUo0(WHICH AND T E4 UR COLORADO CY STANDARDS STANDARDS FOR A dated November 12,1993,and recorded November 72, 1993,In Book 730 at Page 793,as Reception LAND SURVEY PLAT AND THE CURRENT ACCURACY STANDAR0.4 Fat AL7A/ACSM No.363257. , LAND inES SURVEYS):I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS a THE 37.30 foot wide Access Easement as reflected on the St.Luke's Community Health Resources,Inc.Lot Q 2 ( ABOVE DEsc�m PARCEL at TH s DATE MARCH la 2me ExLssT UTILITY y 7 CONNECRON9,ARE ENiiPF1.v WT11BN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL,EXCEPT Lina Adjustment Plat recorded November 12,1993,in Plot Book 33 at Page 3,as Reception No. 0� t AS SHOWN IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY 363254 and the Final Subdivision Plat k PUD for:Maroon Creek Club recorded November 15,1993,in 1 c32 ` i EASF71E1rt gipg7 D ANY PART OF SAN PARCEL,DOCEPT As Plat Baak 33 of Paga 4,as Reception No.363275. e� r� N Z r ��• DPH,........ :F J2.Terns,conditions, provfsiona,agreements and obi(gatlona specified Under the Water Service nLLEn, T Agreement doted July 26,1993,and recorded November 15,1993,m Book 730 at Page 797,as 2 Q O 1T1 y` Reception No.363258. 00 m t 3:?� p 0 33.Any and all notes, easements and redtala as disclosed on the recorded plat of Arthur 0.Pfister_Fully DA Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption Plat recorded April 14th,1997,in Plat Book 42 at Page 45,as Reception No. 403369,and Consort and Ratification of Plat dated May 30,'2008,.and recorded June I ° I / OO o. o5P 16,2008,as Reception No.550278. 77 ry° -2 AAi t 34.Terms,conditions,provision.,agreements and obligations specified under the First Amendment to I - V Water Service Agreement dated July 26,1993,and recorded October 17,1997,as Reception No. 409559. 511 LAZY CHAIR TlAT}'LIs' S' ,R, } G S�RYICls'S 727ZB�ake 0 veno IMPROVEMENT �aYl by..dT—DMC 1 is.+u,vey vnLlaw Nre¢Hors a/rer you I Gl reyond rings, Colorado 81601 Oa%0710812014 e4�. Ho (974}92819708 (FAX 947-9007) SURVEY PLAT CH ROAD . A. sAeun ;e"&&-tm corn ASPEN, CO. 81611 Cpl iaterH etwlcoILot2.dwg OF 1 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT 0 ffar000n Creek Club LOT 2, FINAL PLAT OF THE olf°Co urs etchhrg)31,470. s.F., AREA JOS IRTHUR 0. PFISTER FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION Indicates �0 - Indicates slopes of 20X-SOX(Dots)39,098 SF.,AREA J8X AS RECORDED ON APRIL 14, 1997 IN V - - Indicates slapas of JOX and greater(Dashed)33,547 SF„ AREA 32X PLA T BOOK 42 A T PAGE 45 - MIS Improvement Survey.was performed in Marc, 2014. _ IN THE OFFICES OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER R area/s In Zone X(ores outside of 500 year flood plain)per COUNTY OF Pl TKlIV, STATE OF COLORADO N1 fIRM,}'080970020JC doted„tree 04, 1987. (�. \\\ Due to snow cover at tkne of surrey some Improvements and topographical features . v Septic may not be shown, some of the site detail has been token from previous surwya. UUM AAV AV7M Lids \\ S7727' , GRAPHIC SCALE - a 2a2cfiESPauwMaWdENrASDEsnamm `55 nC - • AMXCAIES S£r NaJ REHAB!CxP MAPorm LS JJRT* \\\\\\\\\\ \\ \1l t\ \\ O LID OAIE CF LINE TABLE - .IMI£1i,RKY J,;7012 tn�, \ \'• 0 6 \ \ \\ A p LINE LENGTH BEARING ,AW BASED~A AID,5 NEHMWIH A MUO FUSnC CAP LS MI fLWAe Ar YE Li 10.09 N55'1300°E _ �we IN FM 50WHAESTOMY CO9AER OF LOT J Or SW FN AL PEAr AND Ar 1W MEWM Y ANIXC POENr(Y SW L07 J ALSO \\\ i Loch a 30 ft L CURVE TABLE °5M BEe M Or N W 59H'SrAeEV nE M DESamm Man69IS \ \ 1 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD CHORD BEARING DELTA TANGENT _ IWO PM'l+fF1w ;uavcTroyaDwr"OlIcsar T81r Ane/ae BeouEeaiENrs As,vo1ED OR xroaN u✓ C7 92.95 215,00 92.23 N83'43'07"W 24'46'14" 47.21 nc BEtrwas ar nE Prnav tixa�ir aawc An°AEaoEx C14 \ \.\ \\\\ \ \ C2 79.28 345.00 79.11 S7T55'00"E 40'16'59" 39.82 _ cry ar Ayrriy zalfva.Aq(mptL,cygJynAL! II \ (ff C3 130.60 185.76 127.93 N75'21*32"El 40'16'56" 68.13 - IIID'SfMrl£T'DOES Nor IEPAESOJ7 A n7LE SE41eD'/BY 17ifS SSeL£itYl ro 02'tE2xAE OwlIX9IP OR 10 z p \\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\\\\,\\\\ 250.00 243.30 N26'OS'S6"E 58'14'08" 139.25 mroNDe E M.01 rs ar on•2 EmrsrerAwExs OF S BEEN Au MMM A ME COA vc ro ISSUIDvw. \ I ASCOMINiS M.ENZY IV 07A ?lAi S Or REGARD NAS BEETS TU MMA DRE rA#WX TO /SINS BY \ ATIORMEM WW GDARANIY nW..OM DA7EVI A{E'22 7072,colaoWeAr NO P02002974 \��� V#S PRCi ER1y Is Suaxcr ro WE FOLLOWV.-EXCEP?1WS PER SA10 nnE.CWM1W?Vr. 1 I 7.Rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights and right of the proprietor /„_ of a vein or lode to extract and remove hl.ore therefrom,should the same be found to penetrate or / - intersect the premises as reserved in the United States Patent.dated April 3,1896,and recorded �IOrIAs� ��T�rll /O, \ 0 ,I0 \ l August 26,1911,in Book 55 at Page 191,as Reception No.074888. \\\\\\\\\1 1 i �) \\\\\\ \�Qt\ \I�\ \t{ \\ 8.Terms,conditions,provislone,agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed dated \ 7t� i 'I` DIS / \ / \ November 7,195,Correction and recordedadda November er ,19 in Book 178 at Pave•79,as Reception No. ,,,...,,,:::+++..��L4pp 097937,and Correction Daed dated November 7,1858.and recorded November 10, 1958,In Book \ o\\\\\\\\\ \\\`\\\\ \\\�d �\Opk� Q� \ �y� / \ \\\ \{ t11,Ut 4 / (a 185-°�Page 486,as Reception No.107215,and in Book 242 6t Page 389Ay Tr l e 9.An and all notes,edsamanta and recitals as disclosed on the recorded plat recorded May 18,1957,in Z5.40 Plat Book 2A at Page 146,a.Reception No.098360. 10.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated May \ 10,1951,and recorded June 1,1951,in Book 175 at Page 513 as Reception No.098386,and Quit \ \ \ 8040.1 4 c m Deed dated December 19,1969,and recorded December 19.1889,in`Book 245 at Page 114, a \ kl ' l' } 1 1 \ Reception No.138379,and Agreement dated December 19,1969,and recorded December 19,1969, `F\ f{O SB �I;,I I ,i II l ill 61 n No.138380.and re-recordetl t 25„1972,m Book 266 at l I 40 in Book 245 at Page 116,as Reception August Page 253,ae Reception No.153537- 119.67T7 53537. 11.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under.the Lease dated May 1, �� ��\\ \\\ w\\ \\` „r A ���III ll �� 11 1 8 1067,and 'recorded February 10,1970,in Book 246 at Page 711, as RecepUon No.139294,and \ .> \\ \ \ \ .�• / I III / l,I / ` I L l F.F. Amendment to Lease dated November 27,1969,in Book 246 fit Page 728,as Reception No. 139295. 7 0 I \\`\a\\\\ .,\\\ �\ l\\ \\\\\\\ �,III;III 'll'sll l l'!/ I 12. Terme,conditions,provisions,9. ndr corded Feb any oblig°tiona specified under the Deed of Easement a.o 1 t 7 dated 929.November27,1869,and recorded February 10,1970,In Book 246 at Page 740,as Reception / \\ r / !IIII IIII l,'l 1 1 1 ll ll$ 1/ I O 1 I S No.139298. \.\\\ (�1 0 6.90 N. 13.Tonna,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified oder the Dead of Easement o dated November 27,1969,and recorded February 10,1970,in Book 246 at Page.746,as Reception W \ i \ ]II S''I I I, 1./ll l I •.I\\\ I 35.20 r No.839297,and Deed of Easementi dated November 28,1869,in Book 246 at Page 752,as Reception _ \\\ N No.139298. t\ N 14.Terms,conditions, provisions,agreement,and obligations specified under the Dead of Easement (O \\\\\ \. \\\ \ �\ dated February 2,1970 and recorded March 18,1970,in Book 247 at Page 424,as Reception No. * 0 138727. GOO -�` IIIIIIII�II I \\ u-\ 1,6 15.Terme,conditions,provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Grant of Easement \ CfB{e doted October 27, 1977,and rocordre November 15,1877,In Book 338 at Page 694,as Reception \ No.199364. Asphhh� III II ILII III �`` \ 1,60 patio N 16.Terme,conditions,provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Second Amendment to ) Lease dated November 14,1977,and recorded November 18,1977,in Book 338 at Page 994,as \ \ \\\\ \ \� U \\\ \ \\\\\\\\ '� I I'I I I `• ; > A �i 2370 O Reception No.199510.17.Terms,conditions, corde A,agreements and oBook 1431 specified Page under the Quit Claim Deed dated August 8,1982,and recorded August 25,1982,In Book 431 of Page 614,as Reception Na.243705. 18.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Lease Agreement dated August 8,1982,and recorded August 25,1982, In Book 431 at Page 627,as Reception No.243707. \\\ 19..Tema,conditions,provialona,agreement.and obligations specified under the Le Pe Agreement dated \\ \ \ \\\ X" � ` / I $ August 16,1982,and recorded August 25,1982,in Book 431 at Page 628,as Reception No. 243708. 20.Tama,conditions.provialons,agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated (� 11\\\��\\ \\\\\\\\\�\\\\�� •\ \�\\\ ` \1'IIIII�IIIi'11111 \� I ,I4 \� I i ` I I \ \ August 8,1982,and recorded August 25,1982,In Book 431 at Page 617,as Reception No. 243706, . yv \\\\ \\ T \,ll I i \ °IIII➢ I 1 20.50 and Amended Agreement dated January 15, 1984,and recorded February 3,1984,in Book 460 at Page 373,ae Reception No.257068. I I I I I O 11 21.An and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Tiehack Water Tank Site •\ `.\\\\� \1111.1lll'Ii dlll!I III .' 1 '\ \ Platting Exemption Plat,recorded September 17,1982, in Plot�Book 13 at Page 88.as Reception No. A1111 244234,and the Tiehack Water Tank Site Platting Exemption Plat dated June 6,1983,and recorded i 71 I I yr7 \ June 10,1983,In Plat Book 15 at Page 5,ae Reception No. 250827. I i 11111111 I•1 \ / 22.Terms,conditions,0 a," an.,agreement.and obligation.specified under the Agreement dated LEGEA-D 7 f ` January 5,1984,and recorded January 6,1964, In Book 458 at Page 752,as Reception No.256282. 260.00 I .I III IIII'IIILI�I (IIII I \\\ 1 ' ( \ _ 23.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Tax Free Exchange _ ceA °° II IIII 1;111\ \, Agreement dated December 6,1983,and recorded February 3,1984,In Book 460 at Page 366,as \., - Reception No.257065. 3 Cmb App4 \ 0° (I \t - 24.Terms,conditions,provislons,agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Dead dated ca,w�ock - December 6,1983, and recorded February 3,1984,in Book 460 at Page 384,as Reception No. 0 o O Found No. 5 Rebar 257067. /• C3 with Yellow Plastic iJ I l 25.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreement.and obligation.Specified under the Quit Galm Deed dated - I I ,py1+ January 19,1984,and recorded February 6,1984,in Book 460 at Page 573,as Reception No. ,JrN) M- AaPm TYee L S 9184 \ IIII \\ I i 1 a,\ '� 257132. N ^ comonuooa Trey NAYDM EZEV. 8027.94 1 to II \ 1 beyy+A � \ 26.Terms,conditions,provislons,agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed dated CO om y VIII` I 1�1 t 5,.11». TTV March 31,1984,and recorded April'11,1984,In Bock 464 at Page 421,as Reception No:258682,and o Te PAaneP d-i III II 11�s I III VICINITY IAP I r=1000! � Clartfication Deed dated September;l2,1988,and recorded February 17,1989,in Book 586 at Page e y - 147,m Reception No.308906. O Faind 1?O"°"""r p1Y pr garapy I•�11\ (q 1 I` a -' 'Z '+ ''•.,,x,p, 27.Terms,conditions,pr.Aalons,tigreements and obligations specified under the Dedication Agreement . 0 Naaiamh - iC17 14 1 III`q I I for Roads dated August 13,1993,and recorded November 12,1993,in Boli 730 at Page 662.as ?pd 'fit -+ Reception No.363240. pd come.vaTce `11111\ 2 II.1 ,\ �4 AJ V 4 28.Terms,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligations specified under the Access Easement � �2 SURVEYnWS CERTIFICATE.- Agreement dated September 8, 1993,and recortled November 12,1993,In Book 730 at Page 774,as -Elea- EI«+m'r lie ~ 1 Reception No.363255. -gee- Rae bene 1 \ •`\`\\\' 1 1 J A�$,6'�• * ;. \ a_ OF COLORADO,7X15 IMEFFREY ALLEN PJT11F PROVEMENT SUER W PROFESSIONAL EPiAED FR01,1µD SLIRVEYOR 1NALII7,THELL A�29.Terme,.conditions,provlaiona,agreements and obligations specified under the Special Warranty Deed a 1111 MONUrAEN1FD LAND S1lR0E'E OF THE PROPERTY CORNER MaNU1QN15,BOTH doted November 12,1993,and recorded November 12,1993,in Book 730 at Page 747,oa Receptlon frac au Trees e,e xnled Io ',o )) +I 7,�w �+ FOUND AM SET,UNDER MT DIRECT SUPERVI9osl AND CNECIONF THAT IT IS No.363250. apprarimnre clop tine �1 TTl 1, ` I t 1 '* `d•. y, { CORRECT TO ME BEST OF MY 8F01EF AND KNOWLEDGE AND THAT ALL Mal a.ditbna,provislone,agreements and obligations specified under the Special Warranty Dead DIwEHsoNs BOTH LINEAR AND ARMs WERE DETERMINED BY M ACCURATE dated November 12,1993,and recorded November 12,1993, to Book 730 at Pae 793,as Reception CONTROL SURVEY IN THE FIELD wCH BALANCED AND CLOSED WIMN A UNIT OF 9 P 0 I 1 ,f �',$.o, �'T•._M. '�Ct 1 IN 15,000(WHICH COAIPU6 MITH COIdtADo PROFEs51 NAL sTANDAROS FOR A No.363257. LAND SURVEY PUT AVID THE QIRRENT ACWRACY STANDARDS FOR ALTA/ACSL 31.30 foot wide.Accede Easement las reflected on the St.Lukes Community Health Resources,Inc.Lot N \ r 1 1 DD '� *G• LN10 1rhE SURV£Y.):I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE Line Adjustmant Plat recorded November 12,1893,-in Plot Book 33 at Page 3,ae Reception No. 1 p. \ - - ABOVE DESCR®ED PMcf1 ON nes oHIE,MARCH lo,OF204.T EXCEPT L.LMUTYEXCEPT 383254 d the Final Subdivision PINY h PUD for, In Plot Creek Club recorded!November 15,1993,in e� r� "1 `J y Ai It?1 CONNECTION EN70tE1Y MnFM THE RENT EVIDENCE of THE PARCEL,EXCEPT Plot Book 33 at Pae 4,as Rec tion No.363275. a\ AS IS NO ANY PAR EVF SAID OR SON OF ANY 8 Reception N \\\7 I I I ti,1 y ROENNO ANY PMT OF SAID PARCEL"EXCEPT AS 32.Terma,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligation*specified under the Water Service • Q e �\ I - e' ,c Agreement dated July 28,1993,and recorded November 15,1993,in Book 730 at Page 797, as W 1 r u e,;'. s 2 °zG \ el o A a Reception d all not-. Y\I,I "SITE f c 33.Any and all notes,easements and recital°.as disclosed on the recorded plat of Arthur O.Pfister'Fully at It L �, 1 y 0as:1s Developed Land.Subdivision Exemption Plat recorded April 14th;1997,in Plot Book 42 at Pogo 45, as 11 \ 1J�111 1!6 �E + �4 ; Rectt3eption No.403369,and Consent and Ratification of Plot dated May 30,.2008,and recorded June Si T AUII1 sae DATE 16,2008,as Retion No.550278. � 34.Term.,conditions,provisions,agreements and obligation,specified under the First Amendment to Woter Service Agreement dated July 26, 1993,and recorded October 17, 1997,as Reception No. �^ N II I•I .ln l .It�a'_r'(j� i _ '�!r_ 409559. A J ti TIITTZF SI1RFF.V1W9 SZRMMS 511 LAZY CHAIR 727 Blake Avenue IMPRO VEMENT Dby, JT - n Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801 RANCH ROAD07/08/2014 (970) 928-9708 (FAX 947-9007) SURVEY VEY PLAT 1 sem;BrrW�&-=E�aa�a ASPEN, CO. 61611 of 511 LAZY CHAIR ASPEN, COLORADO LEGEND ROARING FORK IMPERVIOUS AREA ® EROSION BL ANKETS GRAPHIC SCALE E N G I N E E R I N G ASPHAL T DRIVEWAY SIN FEET P.O. Box 9554 PERVIOUS PA VERS e`N_mf`. Aspen Colorado, 81612 ph: (970)948-7474 f:(866)876-5873 El GREEN ROOFS DRAINAGE BASINS maroon Creek b TOW TOP OF WALL ELEVATION Colf Course BOW TOP OF W.4LL ELEVATION —.5—s— EXISTING WATER SERVICE septic Lids` —. TEL EPHONE L INE OVER HEAD ELECTRIC mow.da. 6145 PROPOSED WATER SERVICE �p �� '•., `. i�,, `.% WL —:: s:— PROPOSED SEWER L INE VICINITY MAP ELECTRICAL LINE �O ////F �'• ,a \+ ', $s3€of ''; ———— PROPERTY L INE t�N j; `•: ! ,e \� 4i PROPOSED CONTOURS ` ` it; ii`, 't ; \ �: --- EDGE OF STRUCTURE EXISTING CONTOURS :l `•i ,Pow i., I f i n c� FL OW L INE • ��X7755 Ei =•`t } •} � k 1l � 5IL T FENCE Ao 1 `t i• HYDRANT '..0,t .•.f t'` .M` f• N9000'00 E 120.00 6O i WV `oA,teoll (�/I WATER LINE VAL VE '. VAI Sh e e t L i s t Tab C e A Sheet Number Sheet Title Offsite _?6,775'i ? o�iw s i i �� 2 Drainage Basins h Found No. 5Rebor 3 Grading and Drainage �I S with Yetlow Plastic Cop ' 44 lry L.5 /9184 3 Utilities y ""°°°°E"W27W 5 Fire Truck Sim. II �' S 6 Erosion Control N� R ? _ o JOB#.•2014-17 � ~ 3 N Z O NUM- RE'VIS/ON-DESCRIPTION DA IE DR—81 1 8040 GREEN LINE REVIEW 7/92014 TRS m b, 2.. 00 4cres f/ `��.� o ......... &ER T r L INE LLI Ph LLI ------- 491S CONTOURS 00 VT EX4 C T TOPO `\, \ / ? �� _ \ VAR/FY IN FlEt D Wz v 4.: .......... \% \t ttt \i 1 .2 LL 0 1 t `�`\�+�k\'`.\`ti �tv\ ''`\t +•..t 't i til` .tt� rift �� �v •,v\ ,v'�` , '�`` ,i�'i t tt Z % k GRAPHIC SCALE % 0•i % ! + \.. �\ 4h` `'t : / \ _ tt ` , i `' 't 't't� '} t.} 11 OFA151�f 8,45 IV\X I IN FEET I 3V09. 0. TV ,,96 SIN V 40-7 V/ CFS %\ % TA %t(0 f�INE! % 4 Time of Concentration :e % A54 VE C0*E1V)VA1oA tt Offsite Basin 1 Inputs outputs U) tit Only valid for 30Dft of developed area Overland Flow Time(T.) .... ... ... % or 500ft of rural area Top Elevation 8116 ft. 0.395(1.1 C),fL, Bottom Elevation 9032 ft. Over Land Distance(Ij 402 ft. TO soO.33 % CONCENTRA108 % Slope(S.) 0.209 ft./ft. %%. 100 yr.runoff oceff.(100% TSI0.35 -4 in the URMP) %E HA' 2 \% Runoff Coefficient,C Pervious) (Equation 3 Overland Flow Time IT.) 9.96 Min. A-�M5.1,q�5 C \CO4 WATER TANK N0-IN CFS Time of Concentration 2MIL GAL % Offsite Basin 2 Inputs outputs Only valid for 300ft of developed area Overland Flow Time(T.) or 500ft of rural area % Top Elevation 8116 ft. Bottom Elevation 8030 ft. 0.395(1.1—C) LD 7 ft. 0.33 . .............. % Over Land Distance(L.) 43 % TO Slope(S.) SO 1 0.197 ft./ft. 100yr.runoffcx,*ff.tIODK ..................................... 035 Runoff Coefficient,C pervious) (Equation 3-4 in the LIAMP) N Overland Flow Time IT.) 1D.S9 Min. .............................. .......... T- ............ JOB 0 2014-17 Peak Discharge Calculations I Hour(P 1) 1.69 Return 100 CHECKEDBY. REG Basin 10 Total Area Imp.Area bripenricna; TIme of C QM. From 2/(10.Td)0 NOTFOR Seeol) ft2 Pereentop Table (Td) .789 1113/se, 1 35309.2 0 0.00% 0.350 9.96 4.62 1.31q CONSTRUCTION 2 47345.06 0 0.00% 0.350 10.59 4.511 1.71 L OFFSITE t 't I It ,t / W LLI 1- x m .. ~% `y "t m o a POC 2 `" " c cb GRAPHIC SCALE Ur 6 Z OFSI �E SA�IN l y I Q :IN FEET l Q I ` � rj ' 1 �•• ,1 `,t •y`\ �tt.•, j �.`� \ I InGn=1011. O ':. A 3.x,709.Y0 SIL " {: � \ 1• 1 '? iJ �1 'y `•. `•," Peak Discharge Developed Calculations 1 Hour(PI) 1 N IN `; 1 POC�7, f ? \ Return Peno 5 /�!��V7 ✓ YJb \ y 7 " t Basin ID Total Area Imp.Area Impervlous C Value Tlme of C Intensity QM" ''i \ See Dl ft' Perce a Flom Table t t 1 r •••] ! 1 I mai Iral 1=29PJI1D«rJa.,.ft/"- 1 17081.89 10239.63 59.95% 0.370 5 3.42 0.497 v l { i \, Q � t., �•• { S j' •'j •?\ Z 10421.9 3966.07 38.06% 0.280 5 3.42 0.229 \ O 1j 3 4574.01 3009.13 65.77% 0.450 5 3.42 0.162 T 32077.8 17214.03 53.66% 0.89 Z li � • i IIOC 1 i / Peak Discharge Developed Calculations 1 Hour(P,) 1.69 Return Peric 100 •i/ •i "\\ 1 1 i ` Basin ID Total Area Imp.Area In"rvi-s C Value Time of C Intensity QM. m I ` / Se(D2) k' percentage FromTabla (TJ 1.29PJ(10+Td""n'/sec fx I I i I I / 1 17081.89 10239.83 59.95% 0.540 5 5.79 1.23 •' •j '� ``t ''".� \t ! ? t i 2 10421.9 3966.07 38.06% 0. 5 490 5 5.79 0.68 •.'l / •`� `0t ai; ;t '`'t i - I i j / 3 4574.01 3008.13 65.77% 0.590 5 .79 0.36 `t \ Total 32077.8 53.66% 226 I I I I I I i Of ASI TN SALIN 2 TIN.Val. RequYed RebuYed Required 'age Required FA BMP Calo,Mbd Vobne Rebuffed Debnbn •" ' SuD-Baso Mea % Sor Fat Area (rwnded:) roun0ed up Lotebn 5q, 1100yr Volum Locabn (CO (so / t, t:•, '`� �.• tampsvwe 10239.93 59.56% a 0.11 17082 170.82 171.0 171.0 SR Bed 317.15 268.43 328 SR Bed z T C 1N917IJ . .P-- 694206 W 'i • `. l I 1 / i 2lnp - _. _398607 35.06% 0.09 6948 69.48 700 70.0 SR Bed 125.53 120.95 126 SR Bed w y l \• �...•, :1 f I 2� - --. 645583 - - - - - -- - - -- - -- _ - - --- - -- t• Q/go- /, �� CF,5 t ( /� 3Pa.na 0D813- �7n; 0.13 49.55 49.55 - 50.0 50.0 Drywel 11449 91.56 115 Drywd it ' •11 / TOW 3207780 53.66% 299.95 289.85 2910 291 559.00 ty 1 ToW -Area 17114.03 JOB[ 2014-17 : y CHECKEDBY. REG I Tool RM'.d(0 960.00 1 1 - -. - Rebored Fol Neal 291.00 1 - 1 ( NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE BASINS 2 6 FIRE TRUCK TURN AROUND ' ,tt t`t 100 RIP RAP TO ENO OF SWALE CENTERLINE PROFILE SCALE i"=20' H 0 R Z. N,P,STA.1+10.96 I"=5' VERT.H. Z .,..tt Pvf SEV.8033.01: — ' .`t �•'':_ _. d7/0. .... . . . . ... . . . ... ...... . . . .. P.EL EV F.N3.73. ... ._... . ... ........ . . . .... ..... .. . ... .1040 W t —T PVI ELFV.6036.11 w _ K=6.61 PROPOSED GRADE Z N °D LOWER 8 \ \ GRADE BREAK STV--m1A •1Svcs:0+37.24 .24 `^� •,� / `I LEVELi \ \\ •. _ ECEV=dY488 BVCE•:8079.68 t 11 t` F.F.=Blk1. �+\ \ 6'DRYWELL ,t'+L `,t . .. . . . ..._ . .. . . ... . . . ... .Evcs�1-81aEVCE:1030.00 . . Lu v w �\ f ROOF DRAINS 'k ``••t '` x N `` t 84v . .... .. . ... .—, _-. . . . .. . ... ,�^^ a yy ,•11 t \t` .`, `+•\\ ',t } EXISTING S `t•i •``tt•tt `{t•':\ t I\ •'tf �/ •tt` j_ 7�0J ' 7�0LOOW,LE,tVEL P4Tf0`�t t •\t, s\ .... . . . . .. . .ANO0LAREA ... . . . . ... 52. , . .... ... RVS dO FLOWLINES \\ `, \ j \ TIU WAK1,Q(1T ,t 1 t ''•.`Ayy A. 1 ,tt :`t t ':\ \ X10 ..... . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..:. .. ..... . . .. . . .... ..:. . . . . . ... .:. . . . . . . . y�51.5E t t`,'t. `'; \ '• fL , ', t : EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE t \ \ UPI R L / PATIO TREJH DRAIR F.F.- 1.5 '� ♦yOWER , • ROUT TO SCR}ENED RO*BEO \ d7/5 X15 •tt•.\ \\ \ .:LEVEL t 4`.F. '\\ o ,k m ti$ n m o \HIGHPOINT NOR SWALES \ QS F'ORYWEL4 FDR (l i \\. •�" y poOL PATIY t ..t \•\ 8 M$ e v 0 .•t .'` } \ MAIN SR 46 UNDER PERVIOUSLY PJVE l•47 LEVEL FIR€TURNAROUIID .t F.F.=840' "It /' DRIVEWAY CENTER LINE PROFILE Q EEP INTl' t\ R FOERCEPTOR RAIN 1 / SCALE I"=20' HORZ. '^ TOIOISCHARGE ONTO LA v, ;• S �• ` L OW INE i r /"=5' VERT � 1 8M''ELtVA TION ;jr tr LINE 00 NOT 6URPASS .,, \ t. 5 1 / fklSO. . . . . . ... . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .6060 NG'-.O TH WE560.I¢ 6010 ? INLETS 70 SCBE€NED ROCK BiD a 00 I• j: f . . ...... .. .. . . .. t I •;�. ` �'e: ?°`l KA \\ tt LOWLINE \ t• I 1 yPIIRE 7RUCK TURN ARO?NO / ••t 4 — lI T`NTE?tLINEi % ''•t t` I RIVE{p{p��AY\ �� it 3 CENT IME % ..: . ....... .. . . .... . . L.P.STA.0+71.81 . . . . . . . . . .. •'.t t 3 1 E / B7%$. L.P.EL EV.B67496 •'•;..i� tt GRADE&FAX STA..-Al 79 .\ PVI STA.047453 PVI EL EVAM8 g •''•\ j I ECEV=101400 6RADf BREAK STA./+9404 \ \ •,.'tt �``•t \ t 1 t ELEV-007£XI \ PROPOSED GRADEqvClN!a?3.67 V, . .. _ .EVCE:6618.98 EV . . . . . .. CS:0437.74 Z EVCE:6079.88 B735. . . . . . 9m� . ... . I I I I I I I _ I / �t� \ •� .; i `:, • 4-TRE A'TRERAI % T RU10EENE 8730 . . . . ... . .. . . HPSTA.1+7619 ROCK HP .1:PV!SrA.1467.97 . . . . . .. .t . .`.._._. . ..7- . . . . . . . ?} CULVRTUNDkR I / ADD FLARED ENO SECTION PVI FLEV,103B70' EXISTING GRADE DRIVE T40 DIVEP/tTp 1 / AND RIP RAP K=491' 8 CHECKEDBY RBG 1.OFF*TE FLOJWS 7458'.24 : GRADE BREAK STA.0+1419 SVCS:1-4161 E4EV=6076.97 BVCE;8037.77 . e I 't . .. . . . . ... . .. . . :.Fvcs:1,7V9.. .. . .. ... .:.. .. ... . .... . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . NOT FOR EVCE:8038.91 PROPOSED GRADE CONSTRUCTION EXISTING GRADE 84. FA GRAPHIC SCALE 2+47 /+50 /+00 0+50 I FEET GRADING AND DRAINAGE 3 6 oe� \EJECT SEWER T ROM SEPTIC LIDS 0 M9ROOM TOSANI RY \I t SYS K .0 % % LLI 19 LLj Z C, D 11% Z INIZ?Ih LLI x E2 0 cc 0 % (-) %\ 0 .2 LL It z Of % % 0 % % % \N h Ill T7 % \It % NEWRLECTRIC TO \ \ ? } ` Q )JECK ROOM C) W EXISTING Q) ATER LINE OVERHEAD IAOWER-ly! P�—�:EPOLE %TO BE BE4RIED N— CL i. iii \t (1) Lo ROU I'VEWMWA SERVICE ' E RVIC E TOEIAALDM ECH R00 .F•=8018' 100� % NjW HYjRANr: % y Sr % EXISTING W(ER EXIS\ING HYOR*T LINE JOB a 2014-17 CHECKED BY REG NOTFOR GAS CONSTRUCTION WATER LINE EXTENDS UP TO 2MIL.GAL. COA WATER TANK TOP OF TANK=8021' BOTTOM OF TANK::083' UPPER FLOOR FJ`r 050.5' GRAPHIC SCALE 1.FEET UTILITIES 4 6 A. % %WATER LINE % Q9 Z w W \ \ ® ® r z Lu V) x o o v 00io 0 LL 0 Z a0 ---FIRE TIRUCK %TURN AROUND CENTERL INE 1 cc .............. EDGE'OF PAVEMENT R 29 ....... OL % R 29' % % NtW HY RANT: "—Njr W EDGE OF-lPA VEflEN1 % � EXISTING �V�,TER LINE— EXISTING HYDRAINT ........... Q % % __` I •'� = 1 t / J080 2014-17 GRAPHIC SCALE CHEOTDBY RBG 10 0 10 NOTFOR IN FEET I CONSTRUCTION I InCh c to m WATER LINE EXTENDS UP TO 2 MIL. GAL. COA WATER TANK TOP OF TANK::8121' BOTTOM OF TANK:::8083' UPPER FLOOR F.F= 8051.5' FIRE TRUCK SIM. 5 6 EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1, CONSTRUCT/ON ROAQ EN7RANCE,STAGING AREA AND PERIMETER EROSION _ CONTROL MEASURES SHAG L BE INSTAL L EO PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING OR EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES. 1 `• 1` —_ 1- STORM ORAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE INSTAL C ED AFTER EROSION CONTROL I i'\ BANK STABYLIZATION",, t _ PLACE HAYBAILS OR METHODS ARE IMPLEMENTED. AL L DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE PROTECTED `•., `,\ ON SLOPES�REATER , — STRAW WATTLE BY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON PLAN. THAN 3:1 '�— CHANNELS O CA TL'N 7E 3. CONTRACTOR SHAG L BE RESPON518L E FOR MAINTAINING ALL ER05ION :, CONTROL BMP'S FREE FROM MUD,DIRT,DEBRIS,ETC. CONTRACTOR SHALL Z cl) STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 1/DAYS OF DISTURBANCE. Of m GRAPHIC SCALE w _ `•,` l \� _ +Q `;, _ < CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE TO CHECK ALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S Z a co WEEKC Y AND WITHIN 1AHOURS OF A RAINFAC L EVENT TO ENSURE THAT AL L to `I \ EROS/ON CONTROL MEASURES ARE FREE OF MUD,OIR7,AND DEBRIS. Z INLET P T T10N•�, ap _ i IN FEET I Z \ C _ 4 . .`'. •', S ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF ACL EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO x W PL ACE HA YB.AIL 5 OR ` I ` `1 /\ �.., '�, v, BE F/EL 0 MODIFIED IF NECESSARY BY CONTRACTORS ENG/NEER. Y $ `o STRAW NIATTLE I `� �;,^ \T••• `Q�, �\ `.� - I CIN ATCNASEOINENO ;� • �. \. p O c% n 4. 1 \ t \ 6.EROS/ON CONTROL AND 5TORMWATER MANAGEM£N7 PLAN AND BMP'S u- / \\ \ \ \ CONFORM WITH THE COPS PERMIT, d :� I i _ \ 7.CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL RUNOFF PASSES THROUGH THE Z 1 sll T FAy�E \ PRESCRIBED BMP'S IN SPECIFIC AREA5 AL L OCA TED ON THIS PL AN. Q' /`, , Q d REVEGETAT/ON PRACTICES SHALL FOLLOW ALC L AND DISTURBING 0 ACTIVI7IE5 IMMEDIATE[Y UPON COMPL ET/ON OF 5410 AC IlVI71ES. IF ` REVEGETA7ION PRACTICES ARE DELAYED,THEN THE FINISHED TOPSOIL GRADE •\ BANK 5TABILIZ4 TIONk. ONL OPES G \\ ! `�„ '', •`: t SHALL BE PROlECTEO AGA/NST WIND AND WATER EROSION WITH TEMPORARY TH'N 3 \�\ \\• v ,! \\ `'\ ,` '}• \ EROSION CONTROL BMP'S IMMEDIATEL Y UPON COMPLETION. t b '', \ \ `\ 9. EROS/ON CONTROL FENC/N6 AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHAL L Q� `,.\ •\ ' BE REMOVED AFTER AL L VEGETATION SEEDING 15 AT L EAST 901 GERMINATED. = p PHASING AND SEQUENCING NOTES: U /.INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. ` 0 / `� ..; \ `''} rl l• O "+` ? •.} S Z SIL T FENCE SHAL L BE INSTAL L ED PR/OR TO ANY GRADING. U v l ', `\ ...`viv, t.•t ,�, '`'S •{' \�` �[ ;j j..'•\ .i. TOPSOIL WILL BE 5TRIPPED AND STOCKPILED WITH REINFORCED SIL T FENCE W SURROUNDING STOCKPILE ANO THEN SEEDED ANO 5TRA WED FOR a STABILIZATION. �� r; �\�\ \\1 I i f• / J.AL L STRUCTURES ARE TO BE CL£AN£0 ONCE OEPOS/TED SEDIMENT REACHES a 113 THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE. it '; \ f �.\\ ••j ! BANK 5T IZ f N : I f r. ?r S PIPES ARE TO BE FL USH£D ONCE SITE HAS BEEN STABIL/ZED. } \ \\\\\ \ •S•, CONTRACTOR IS RESPON5I8L E FOR REMOVAL OF DIRT FROM \} •..� \\\\\\\\\ \\ / INLET PR TEC ION Z-VEHICLES LEAV/NG THE SITE, z `\ .`\ \ \\ •\ EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 5 TO BE INSPECTED EVERYcar I d y \\ \\ •� '•. \ ., f} s / SEVEN CAL ENOAR OA YS OR AFTER EVERY STORM EVENT THAT I I I I I I I ,tty ri• I'. C'` `' / I / EOUAL 5 OR EXCEEDS 1/1'OF PRECIP17AT/ON, a ACEAYBAJLS OR / •maem a•Iw clXlar .Iwsw•nw a•n¢.IIXn. BAIy((STABILIZATION \ \..� , M1,•i, I i STRAW WATTLE it �`\ .•`\ % ON SL OPES GREA TER \ Iyy CHA}}IfLS 0 nl.um ra,l.�m ` 4 THAN 3:1 Cj1TCN�EOfM NT / asT[•.XXIITwW�� `,NJ T`•pROT CTfO j � � STABILIZED Xo uuF SILT FENCE g \\ CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Z u X..mun can•Nmnxc nuX�a ucr.Irca &,,,,,s..smX.e.. w •� 8 i 1,"1V1 �_..�FX[[IXcTU I.TION � '••t•\ •''�• BANK STABI&ZATIOA '•�� zo ,\ ON.4L OPES L{REATER } THAN 3:1 '� / / g Via' OR 1 111111 1 •� 1 1 ` . — 4 `_�'•� •!i :k j +r i _ .,..• m' .roar 2014-17 `\, 1 . n+�w.• CHECAEDBY. RBG i _ i i i I / �.• .. dam.. �� y„� T NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION '��i ` XXMN rnsl(M () olmula: 7.x"9.w••w 1244 R Y•MN IID11(111 Fal TIID-rAr p1Rw,cL EROSION CONTROL 6 6 �I Residential Design Stan ards Compliance 511 Lazy Chair Road RDS Section Code Description compliance Description Referenced 2 Sheets, A.Sits Design 1.Building orientation. The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street On comer lots,both The subject let tlws not have any street facing facades and is accessed via private drive. street-facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets.On curvilinear streets,the from facade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street.Prowls as outlined in Subsection 26.410.010.8.4 shall be exempt from this requirement One(1)element,such as a bay window or dormer,placed at a front comer of the building may be on a diagonal from Bre street B desired. 2.Build-toIlnee. On parvule or lots of less than fifteen thousand(15,000)square feet,at least sixty percent N/A (60%)of the front fagade shall be within five(5)feet of the minimum front yard setback line. 715 West Main Street Suite 204 On corner sites,this standard shell be met on the frontage with the longest block length. Aspen,Colorado 81611 Porches may be used o meal the a*percent(60%)standard. P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 3.Fences. Fences,hedgerows and planter boxes shall not be more than forty-two(42)inches high, N/A measured from natural grade,in all areas forward or the from facade of the house.Manmade Demo are prohibited in the front yard setback B.Building Form 1.Secondary meas. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent(10%)of their total The master wits serves as a secondary moan accounts for 28%of total SF above grade. 511 LAZY CHAIR square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal Vem"I circulation connects the two in tone of a stair and an elevator. building or linked to it by a Subordinate linking element.This standard shall only apply to 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC parcels within the Aspen Infill area pursuant to Subsection 26.410.010.8.2.Accessory buildings Such as garages,sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate 511 Lazy Chair uses for tha secondary mass.A subordinate linking element for the purposes of linking a Aspen,CO 81611 primary and secondary mass shall be at least ten(10)feet in length,not more than ten(10) feet in width,and with a plate height of not more than nine(9)feet.Accessible outdoes space over the linking element(e.g.a deck)is permitted but may not be covered or enclosed.Any railing for an acceesible outdoor space over a linking dement must be the minimum reasonably necessary to provide adequate safety and building code compliance and the railing must be 50%or more transparent. C.Parking,Garages and 1.For all meld ndal uses a Parking, PSE OF CO<O� B garages and wnparta shall be accessed from an alley or private road. Private Road .� Carports that have access from an y alley or prints road,the b)B or the garage dos are visible from a street or alley,than they shall be singleo ad ing standards -stall doors Private Ro followshall double-stall docs designed to appear like single-stall doors. VON * WILSONappy; 402127 ti c)If the garage docs are not visible from a street or alley,the garage doom may be either Currently Using single doors Cry \�foU single-stall o normal doublestall garage doors. ,y SFD pµG Z For all residential uses a)On the street facing fawde(S),the width of the living area on the first floor shall be at least N/A that have access only from five(5)feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. a public street,the following standards shall b)The from facade of the garage or the front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set N/A be apply: back at twat ten(10)feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the house. CONSULTANTS c)On lots of at least fifteen thousand(15,000)square feet in sire,the garage or carport may N/A SURVEYOR be forward of the front facade of the house only B the garage docs o carport entry are Tuttle Surveying Services perpendicular to the street(side-loaded). 727 Blake Ave Glenwood Springs,CO 81901 d)When the floor of a garage or carport is above or below the street level,the driveway cut N/A (970)928-9708 wdhin the fmm yard Setback shall not exceed two(2)feet in depth,measured from natural jegQtss-us.com grew. e)The vehicular entrance width of a garage or carport shall not be greater than twenty-four NIA CIVIL (24)feet Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 n If the garage docs are visible from a public street or alley,then they shall be single-stall N/A Aspen,CO 81611 doom or cauda-stall doom designed to appear like single-stall doors. (970)448-7474 RichardG@rfeng.biz D.Building Elements 1.Street oriented entrance All single-family hones and duplexes,wwpt as outlined In Subsection 26.410.010.8.4 shall N/A and principal window. have a street-oriented entrance and a street facing principal window.Multi-family units shall GEOTECH haw at least one(1)streeladented entrance for every four(4)units and front units must he" CTI-Thompson a street facing a principal window.On caner lots,entries and principal windows should few whichever street has a greater block length.This standard shall be satisfied if all of the fdlowing condtions are met a)The entry door shall few the street and be no more than ten(10)feet back from the front- N/A most wall of the building.Entry doors shell rot be tetter then eight(6)feet STRUCTURAL TBD b)A covered entry porch of fifty(50)or more square feet with a minimum depth of six(6') N/A feet,shall be part of the from facade.Entry porches and canopies shall not be more then one (1)dory in height. c)A street-facing principal window requires that a significem window or gmup of windows few WA street CONTRACTOR 2 First story element All residential buildings shall haw a first story street-facing element the width of which N/A Kevin McClure comprises at least twenty percent(20%)of the building's overall width and the depth of which PO Box 6957 is at least six(6)feet from the wall the first story element is projecting fmm.Assuming that the Snowmass Village,CO 81615 first story element includes interior living spew,the height of the first story dement shall not (970)379 9088 exceed ten(10)feet,as measured to the plate height.A first story element may be a porch or KvnMcClum@gmail.com living spew.Accessible space(whether B is a deck porch or enclosed area)shall not be ::lowed over the first story element;however,accessible space over the remaining first story elements on the from fagade shall not be precluded. 7112014 DATE OF PUBLICATION 3.Windows. a)Street-facing windows shall not span through the area where a second flow level would N/A typically exist,which I.between nine(9)and twelve feat(12)above the finished first floor.For interior stdreases,this measurement will be made from the first lending if one exists.A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. b)No mora than one(1)nonorthogonal window shall be allowed on each fawde of the N/A building.A single nonorthogonal window in a gable end may be divided with mullions and dill be considered one(1)non-oMogonal window.The requirement shall only appy to Subsection 26.410.010.8.2. Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE 4.Llghtwdls. All areaways,Iightwells and/or stairvmlls on the street4acing facade(s)of a building shall be NIA Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDMENT entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building, E Context 1.Materials. a)The quality of the exterior materials and details and their application shall be consistent on Yes all sides or the building. PROJECT NO: 1405 b)Materials shall be used in ways that are two to their characteristics.For instance stucco, Yes DRAWN BY: SMW which is a light or non-bearing material,shall not be used below a heavy material,Such as stone. COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC c)Highly reflective surfaces shall not be used as exterior materials. Using stone,wood siding,and glating 2.Inflection. The following standard must be mat for prowls which are six thousand(6,000)square feet or WA over and as outlined in Subsection 26.410.010.B.2: e)B a we-story building exists directly adjacent to the subject Site,than the new construction NIA must step down to one-story in height along their common lot lira.If them aro ono-story buildings on both sides of the subject site,the appfcam may choose the side toward which to Inflect. A one-story building shall be defined as follows:A we story building shall mean a drucNrs or N/A Potion of a structure,where there is only one(1)floor of fully usable SHEET TITLE living spew,at least twelve(12)bet wide aaose the street frontage.This standard shall be met by providing a one story element which is also at least"Iva(12)feet wide across the street frontage and one(1)spry tall ea for back along the common lot line as the adjacent Z 1 0 04 building is one(1)story, RDS COMPLIANCE II / 1 OPOSED REE / f r ELOCATI \ �V r \ ', ���,� 5 f70 LAZnMA Iffi TILCC \\ \ 511648 rpt \' DEMO EXISTING' II \ Aep6n,CO81811 _ FENCE ASSEMBL \\ i r s OF :� a 1 r I I EMO �o ��;r7 I � P D�AND,MECH.I` III "�� �1/ E UIPNtENT WILSON ,` \\ DEMO XISTING 1t NALsoN EONS RUC ON-fEN ING? j ' ` � - \ \ E EA SEMBLY \I 402127 ti AT O6 EL qf- \ \ rJ �t s � i '.�1-� r I i •e �- cry `'-- _ N � ;-COI"- -DEMO MASONRYL a :. G, FCO $E slTe wAu £ fi p EA iNENT ) ) CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR MAS NI Y ITEr \ \ \ f I l 1 s TLEP3L�u9 RVICES 727 8IakK1LkJ6JENUE �r�- c-��""7 v 'E 3-"I- r } :' k3n• t WALL -• \ , 1 I . - � -C til- --1- .�-?" .� ' r- r4a�":2+F,•r \� / x4 \ - �\ / 1. GldeNgCd(9pr"BJ60$1S01 81601 , �, C b \ ( I1, P974/,92&WM8 F.970.947.9007 POLE I�, T 1 / - r \ I ( 1 W@ft- RB@TSS-US.COM I I I �I ' STAI STO / �; y� BE C� MO I CIVIL y.. r _ R MOVE ME H., I ! \ r �. ` MkERING E UIPMENI I I 1611 .ray_ 1 I I�• I I i �.� ,rr x i r_ r. I 7.� �� }�/v �'Y 1_ � J7�' "1 *gK1G.BIZ GEOTECH �-j 1 ' 11 ` cn7esaDN y i I ` DEMO PATIO SLAB I /DEMO E TIRE , I 'x ON GRADE 4f ',5G 1T T 1 STRUCTURE I' I \' t _ r� 1�" =1' � , ' Ixr u;Iv}�./ � � I i I_. y •.`'a. I M �'� 1��1 STRUCTURAL DEMO STONE I x -DEMO CONCRETE F FENCEONG t TBD x} I jiAPPLIED CONCRETEIr�-STAIRASSEMSLY t r G ESL QAVC _. >r.t = �U -y` "� _. >•�\ -SE RWALL T ' :1?PEF21�hyEJERrPERi ff (:. I. -t JI �' I a .DEMO STONE'. ONCREr', CETr CONTRACTOR bRE- _ /t 'k �. t' _1- [y- - I 1\ " DEMO STONE �1� 16 � e �:��\ ��, 9c„ I ..a- -T-- -1 .� t .APPLIEDCONCRETE EY 4 t `' a-\ ;� tEutS1RT.COM mVAu onr6 OF aueucArroN CONCRETE %F�.�� G�y�� � �%r'• `r''• L -1 \� 3 ASPHALT_\ \�\ \ FIREH 11' x \ fit Y \ CONCRETE DRIVE 8517 SO FT Z 7111MI4 8040GREENLINE -(•_.4 Ste-__._\_ \- -L`. =; .. a F?, t4 G% Z 9R&14 PLATAMENDMENT ASPHALT DRIVE 2718.25 SO FT 310 FT OFFENCE ASSEMBLY TO BE REMOVED PROJECT NO: 1405 �� DRAWN BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE 1 i DEMO SITE PLAN 1" =2U N ® DEMO SITE PLAN 10' 20' 40' 80' ��1�11t • l H :T it 715 West Main Street Su4e 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 4 1 P 9702794157F 866 770 5585 i 511 LAZY CHAIR f 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC ` 511 Lary Chair / Aspen,CO 81611 L L !�OF C0<O i y - / i EL P /G> $1 �`UNDISTURBED SITE AREA '` � � � STEVEN WILSON 402127 ti DRAINAGE PATH CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR \ UPPMtM (I S E WALLi� Tuttle Surveying Services ELEV*8Q61.8' " 727 Blake Ave PATOON GRADE tt Glenwood springs.CO 81901 A ` I, \, (970)928-9708 t ELEV=8027 (eff@tss-us corn CIVIL t J f l . � V l � RoaringFork En9ineer 9PdWERPOLE PO Box 9554 I AsPe n CO 81611 i MAIN LEVEL } r f�' {� (970)448-7474 ELEV=8040' t r i � �I RichardG@riengb¢ GEOTECH Zn= m r 1 {{ ! f�. CTL Thompson PROPOSED DRIVEWAY r rr �(� I ELEV=8040' 7! - SITE W kLL j f. STRUCTURAL cAMeEi DAY--� SITE ALL � _. � 1 � �I TBD �f �, �. L CONTRACTOR i f 'UNDISTURBED 917E AREA 1 J r KeNn McClure P( Boz 6957 Sno mass Village,CO 81615 (970)379 9088 K-McClure@gmad can DRAINAGE PATH, 7111Q014 DATE of PUBLICATION 7�� Z 7111114 8040GREENUNE Z 3/28114 PLATAMENDMENT LOWER LEVEL ELEV=8027' ! f f 1 I PROJECT NO: 1406 �'• �; DRAWN BY: SMW RELOCATED EVERGREEN S f� � �. �� rl % COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC RELOCATED DECIDUOUS PROPOSED EVERGREEN STORY SETTINGS VVAINLEVEL ELEV=8052' N SHEET TITLE AIN LEVEL ELEV=8040' PROPOSED DECIDUOUS OWER LEVEL ELEV=8026' Z1 -011 SITE PLAN SITE PLAN 1" =20' LOWER PATIO Y Y 715 West Main Street,Sulte 204 -(� Aspen,Colorado 81611 P:970.279.4157 F:866.770.5585 POOL C 511 LAZY CHAIR ij 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC C 511 Lazy Chair Aspen,CO 81611 o F - MAIN DECK � OF C04 IcT'ds`.� } rI1+tJ Rudl� ����.K — STEVEN O' Q� CONSULTANTS w i a .:i ) i a`)/� i \\ '\ •\ \ SURVEYOR ) a .. Tuttle Surveying Services 727 i- ) a )i 1 \. A �\ �jf \� ""., Glemoke Ave Glenwood Springs,CO 81901 MAIN'L'EVEL left@tss8us7com 08 t CIVIL /.>,v,. \ \ .7 , `',�y, \\ •� \\\ \ \ •� \1 Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box Aspen,CO1611 4 .\\ \ \ \ \ \ \�\ \� \- - \ \ — (970)448-7474 ______I RichardG@rfeng.b¢ GEOTECH w_3//.i } `\ \ \ :. \\, CTL Thompson ` + as aa.1 ))>)aa'9.fa{a STRUCTURAL Ai :\I \ � \\ \ \ \ �. \\\ TBD ... 't ivv)/�aa i a,a9 aa\\a t�;, \�\\\\\: 'a ��\����'� - \1\. ,� ,\I ,\ .�\ \\\ \� \\ \\�\\. �•.��� \� � I CONTRACTOR yr _ s 54)y _ � Kevin McClure PO Box 6957 \\N Snowmass Village,CO 81615 9 799088 KvnMc KvnMcClure@gmail.com 33jr' ! ) i -0 , a30 711112014 GATE OF PUBLICATION a,)LOWER LE_VEL> r i ) v i _? ) w ; d \\\ I •,�, _ h ;?s, \\\\\\ DRIVEWAY 4 .i v ? a a i UPPER a s r ) a e s a a 1 -} 4 ? 1 a a a 1 a Z 7/11/14 8040GREENLINEM e a v J a B .) v -0 ; ? ) j 1 7 �'- I AE Z 3/28/14 PLATAMENDENT a a a ) 4-1) �r / .s1 �V v\ Vw 4 '? fi PROJECT NO. 1405 A i i v a.; 3 ) ) 9 � � Y s s s \ \\ \ � DRAWN BY: SMW i )'',)'4 > )11 3 a i �1 � COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC 5�1 \ v a 4 j a " , i a SHEET TITLE Z1 -012 EXTERIOR LIGHTING PL/+N 1/8"=1 EXTERIOR LIGHTING MONO LED W W HELI X SCREEN LED WVI ... + 620201 22 L 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 P 970 279 4157 F 866 770.5585 n •.n -- 511 LAZY CHAIR ... �..... 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC MIL b Loc. r ■ 511 Lary Chair Aspen,CO 81611 a, F .>.x. ..r. , ADB.TAUGHT; of cot y •--�-----.---- STEVEN * WILSON MONO IED W ar�ua uleEx LEorrw 402127 W �' i C) 6233 n np2 Occt,SFO AaGaS Jo6,pf ..,..,�,• .>eoo..00„�. `v_ HImaAXDloNro4rE ro CONSULTANTS -°° ° °°° ALIGHT Z DELTALIGHT' SURVEYOR NwxrAn•rks wm-A,.m,ca Tuttle Surveying Services 727 Blake Ave ....�d._�..�..�...� .,,...,..°.,>...,.. ------ ..,...,. ......_ ..,w .,...,,.,..®....e�.�+w+. .... w ,�,�.,,.,•.m ,. Glenwood Springs,GO 81901 (970)928-9708 Jeff@tss-Dg.Com FiXTURE A FIXTURE A FIXTURE B FIXTURE C CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 Aspen,CO 81611 (970)448-7474 RichardG@rleng.ba GEOTECH CTL Thompson AULA 60 WIN BJ18 17.102 Z DELTALIGHT Specification Photometric Sheet Data , STRUCTURAL Cartes II X S1 Camee II X S1 > .._ CONTRACTOR o! ® trKevin McClure PO Box 8957 i P r a SnOWRIasS Village,CO 81615 ”--- (970)379 9088 Use lampdata from - - •, � ..,.e,w,rn.e,lmo.,sa.. KvnMCClure@gmailcom r the manula Ftuyer /, ..a,. 7111/1014 DATE OF PUBLICATION _— v,s- ...• ... i\ >.. N DELTALIGHTIT .� 6•,.tia�m. Q',.M...„. AULA 00 WIN ,e•n,wr ®�0.1 631817.102 � � b... Z 7/11/14 6040 GREENUNE Z 3126!14 PLATAMENDMENT Quem•ner+7.e roraaf�r.s;x-8m1U4 aYc,b ir..n....,••.y 'i ` PROJECT NO: 1405 � DELTALIGHT DRAWN BY: SMW � 29 DELTALIGHT u6."n.r.•,•,.sam_ uf,. ,,,,..,,,, COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC — c..ai•ry,a",•wsomw ..._.n.., f.,,r .,m„u,wn....ah.a,. FIXTURE 0 FIXTURE D FIXTURE E SHEET TITLE 41TEQ11 - 3 LIGHTING CUTSHEET --� vv •- WALK OUT LOWER LEVEL ELEV=802T / ,\ - \ 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 \\ Aspen,Col157 FadO 6 611 770 J � 4�--�•�` \ P 970 279.4157 F 866 770 5585 - 511 LAZY CHAIR / \ \ 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lary Chair Aspen,CO 81611 DF C04O� —�� P STEVEN VIALSON 402127 i ~ U 1 CONSULTANTS % SURVEYOR Tutt/ MAIN LEVEL II 727 B aSurveyingAServices 727 Blake Ave ELEV=8000' I / (9170)928-Springs,CO 81901 (970)928-9708 jeff@tss-us com = I CIVIL I RoaringFork Engineering 5 9 //I I - - PO Box 9554 \i Aspen,CO 81811 I (970)448-7474 J j RichardG@rkng.ba C CTL ThTm opson �/- --- I � STRUCTURAL 4 f I TBD 1 CONTRACTOR I Kevin McClure _� / Snovanass Village.CO 81615 UPPER LEVEL I \ / 970PO 837997 ELEV=8051'6" I / / KvnM3799088 mail.com '� I — —1�J.'// �\•' � // /� 1111R01. DATE OF VUBLIGTgN �'�� \ •� I Z 7111114 SO40 GREENLINE Z 3128/14 PLATAMENDMENT PROJECT NO: 1406 DRAIAM BY: SMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI.LLC ------ -- SHEET TITLE —_ ----------- Z 1 -014 PLAN 1/8" = V-0" PLAN 28'SITE OFFSET • I 715 West Main Street.Suite 204 Aspen,Colorado 81611 I P g70279 4157 F 866 770 5585 x �Iz <IJ - 511 LAZY CHAIR _ 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC - 511 Lazy Chair Aspen.CO 81611 1/ OF Co4 co F F " J / - WILSON -- F Affi-LIJI-fl- _. -.<..- -y—y 402127 ti U OTM El 11 11 F T � T r/ n s� �T F CONSULTANTS Tuttle Surveying Seances 727 Blake Ave - _ Gle Springs,CO 81801 (970)928-928-9708 teH@tss-us com ` CIVIL - Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 _ Aspen.CO 81611 (970)448-7474 RlchardG@rfeng.b¢ GEOTECH CTL Thompson NORTHEAST 3/16"= V-0" iw 28SITE OFFSET FROM UPPER LEVEL STRUCTURAL Iz FACE OF STRUCTURE—\, TBD 28'SITE OFFSET FROM COWER LEVEL ' - - - - - �.1�r CONTRACTOR FACE 0000 STRUCTURE PO Box 957e Snowmass Village.CO 81615 (970)379 9088 i — KvnfAcClum@gmail.com TI112014 GATE OF PUB4GTION 7/11114 8040 GREENLINE Z 3128I14 PLATAMENDMENT PROJECT NO 1405 - DRAWN BY: sMW _ COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC T ( T T T T T! f SHEET TITLE Z1 -015 ELEVATIONS EAST 3i 16"= 1'-0" 28'SITE OFFSET FROM UPPER LEVEL FACE OF STRUCTURE-� 715 West Main Street,Surle 204 Aspen.Colorado 81611 P 70 279 4157 F.866 770 5585 511 LAZY CHAIR 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lazy Chair Aspen,CO 81611 OF C04 Op h STEVEN * WILSON --�_- 402127 � U OF,�SF0 ARG �\1W CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Tuttle Surveying Services 727 Blake Ave Glemvood Springs,CO 81901 (970)928-9708 jeff@tss-us mm CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 Aspen.CO 81611 (970)448-7474 RiUardG@rreng.b¢ GEOTECH CTL Thompson NORTHWEST 3/16 1'-0" STRUCTURAL TBD 28'SITE OFFSET FROM UPPER LEVEL CONTRACTOR FACE OF STRUCTURE Kevin McClure PO Box 6957 Snowmass Village.CO 81615 (970)379 9088 KvnMcClum@gmai1.com 7111=14 DATE OF PWLIGTION j I Z 7/11/14 8040 GREENLINE Z 328/14 PLATAMENDMENT I I II ISI ITit III I �i - .. _ - PROJECT 1406 i � DRAWN BY:: 3MW ,II�I II .� I I III I I i i COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC I � _ I ❑ ��❑ - -}' SHEET TITLE I Z1 -016 WEST 3116„= 1•-0' ELEVATIONS w 715 West Main Street,Suite 204 Aspen.Colorado 81611 P.970 279 4157 E 866 770.5585 511 LAZY CHAIR 511 LAZY CHAIR LOT 2 LLC 511 Lary Chair Aspen,CO 81811 OF COLOR y STEVEN * WILSON 40212 n�RSEO AaC,r\ u CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR Tuttle Surveying Services 727 Blake Ave Glenwood Springs,CO 81901 (970)928-9708 )eff tss-us com CIVIL Roaring Fork Engineering PO Box 9554 Aspen.CO 81611 (970)448-7474 RichardGarkng.ba GEOTECH CTL Thompson 28'FROM LOWER LEVEL FACE OF STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL TBD i — Illi l CONTRACTOR Kevin McClure PSnow mO Box 8957 l 970)3 9 9088�e.C0 81615 i KvnMcClure@gmailcom 7/11=14 DATE Or%JBLIGTgN 71 Z 7111114 8040GREENUNE Z 328114 PLATAMENDMENT b PROJECT NO: 1405 DRAWN BY: BMW COPYRIGHT FORUM PHI,LLC SHEET TITLE Z1 -017 SOUTH 3/16'= 1'-0" ELEVATIONS