The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.800 Meadows Rd.0083.2014.ASLU I THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department, CASE NUMBER 0083.2014.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 12129 008 PROJECTS ADDRESS 800 MEADOW ROAD PLANNER JUSTIN BARKER CASE DESCRIPTION ASPEN MEADOWS GENATOR INSTALL REPRESENTATIVE AT&T CABLE DATE OF FINAL ACTION 1.23.15 DATE OF FINAL REFUND/ 1.23.15 PAYMENT CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.4.15 351212 q6 o c0g3 20( A:sw LJ mrrT11 %. :' ..a3. . r il Ftl€� Edr# tetdNar ate Farm Re arts Parma Tab ` el 9 P� P t 46A -i",H Via , ,y... rtx ' 'u qhs. v, 11F E gain CustomFeidsoufinj7 Status Fee Summ 3 Adidns Boutin H�sko � (� `� V ,2,.. o Permrtfype jaslu � Aspen Land t 800 MEADOV�S RD WMIlk A. i€Address Ap�`Su�te� � � � £ J s ., .:133 . ;.,.�s.'as3,3f / ? ,I3 1 q �° ASPEIJ State:CO v � Zip'81611 r3 , l ..) Per Informafion 2 r (x (�4astepe and ' Rou6ny queue aslu07 �,ppfEed 12 0U2014 E c —4, A. .,�,,,-W 1SG" £ E ... F l{< Prolec# ' Approved ��Status pending Descr rO,APPLICATION FOR ASPEN MEADOWS GENERATOR INSTALL sued� O� Closed�Fnal'' ��ft Submitted ATT EVIE GOIAEZ 303 3917333 �Io Running LD'ays Expires 11126t2015 i .ar ac`- „.:... ' "ms's,. . ,. ., a y. Elf : r:, <-r,. - k -.,f r. �,. ,€Y ,zw=;' '; last name, DYPVAfv91CS INFORI,9AT1OIJ First name ROILY COLETTE�i 1751E 138TH AVE w 'BRIGHTON CO 80112 " Phone t303)3671342 � a,� Atldre� ' hppllCant a , M,kk zu , Owner is applicants ❑Contractor is applicant. Last name JAM CABLE First naive If _..Phone t ) Cust 121903 Lender,".., Last nameFirst name' j PhoneAddress l Displays the permit applicant s first name Mv a » z .: � AspegGoldS(server angelas 1 of 1 . _, a NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL FOR THE ADDITION OF A GROUND MOUNTED GENERATOR TO SUPPORT EXISTING TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT AT 800 MEADOWS ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PARCEL IA, ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-121-29-008 APPLICANT: AT&T, 188 Inverness Drive West, Ste. 400, Englewood, CO 80112 REPRESENTATIVE: General Dynamics, 1751 East 138`h Ave. Brighton, CO 80602 SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Addition of ground-mounted generator to support existing telecommunication equipment at 800 Meadows Road (Aspen Meadows) SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval to add a ground mounted generator in the parking garage to support existing telecommunications equipment. The proposed generator location is in the northeast corner of the mostly subgrade parking garage. The location and specifications of the equipment is located in Exhibit A. STAFF EVALUATION: The proposed location for the generator is within an unused area of the garage. The Aspen Meadows PUD requires a minimum of 97 off-street parking spaces. This number will be unaffected by the addition of the generator. New conduit will follow existing lines within the structure. The proposed generator requires a stainless steel vent pipe that will lead outside the parking garage. Building code requires it to extend 10' above the tennis courts for adequate ventilation. Generally, the pipe will be screened from view by vegetation. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for Wireless Telecommunication Equipment to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby APPROVES the request. RECEPTION#: 616908, 01/23/2015 at 01:03:51 PM, 1 OF 5, R $31.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Page 1 oft Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO APPROVED BY: 66M . ✓ Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A—Approved plans (recorded) Exhibit B —Review Criteria (not recorded) Exhibit C —Application (not recorded) Page 2 of 2 at&t X --j� , r -- Eli NoN I i I s 9 _ I ASPEN nnEADOw DAS 1 {� I Fnfl^_800155 �' I 620161HSiR&t - D@rvER CO BOAT I 7.114.1.0 PROPOSED PARKING N LOT LAYOUT A-2.2 PROPOSED PARKING LOT LAYOUT no sckF NOTE'. ^ �- THESE DRAwING2 w E CREAT 'cA` o+T PJRs �oaS�� _ 55-0„ WITHOUT A SURVEv. 10 at&t i0 GENERATOR LEASE AREA .. ............... .. ........_ ......__._ .farm 3 INI LEASE AREA mo � mo _ y 3 ...__.. ._ __... ......... ___...I. ...._........._ ..... __....... G 0'CONDUIT IS 10 ROU1W _..... I ....... .. OR 10 VERIFY ALL COND U PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR IPI Ara'NA1URAl GAS 9 U ROUtESACi E'ER"OR SKIDS SUPPLIED By y - MFR. El BATTERIES J mswe�.am.su_ NO E: IPI NATURAL GAS LINE REFERENCE 5/AS FOR ALL iJ GENRATOR TNEIiFR PENETRATIONS S E)TELCO I BOARD IC, { ` --- RI I z im.� 5 • f IEI LINAGE - e - `\) I POWER PLANT �uP I bRSYs EI UMTS -- - - -- i ... «..,. fp)A 0 BOL,ARD CONNECT TO IP) K'L OC. - GROUND RING. �— IREAC UIPMENi ...-.... I .__..... ITYP.OF 51 RETE-2 a, IPI 1'O REMOVABLEtv P. I - BOIIARD IOF II JE)RR.RACK IPI GROUND $ RING VA F O PROPOSED GENERATOR LOCATION I — ��/� IEI LTE RACK- ..I I I TIE)GENERATOR INTERFACE .._. IE)2ooA _ .I INTEGRATED IEI HF RAC, _ 111 PANEL SYSTEM AT&T LEASE `Y AREA = R 2 I o t 3 I L= SEE 5/A 5 FOR ANv NEw sNELrER .._,_ _—,— PENETRATIONS KEY LEGEND �^ulEIwr�oLL��.r.ooecMeef `' cowwfoe u" ASPEN MEADOW DASlPlALL oA kt,uiED FAt12B001 s5 (� PIIpPK Goegmtoe efeEen,Oe nineM " se vans In ov zessl 6A 161H SIREEt Oj 'I,PI I'coroulwos+.,xL efneanroero,r�f pl iln vu.fL-e-N DENVHt COBRA2 rtLO Loc+trot+FOR 1 Iol<a+oInFINPeox LRulTO efv LEI ACCEST----/.., - >o GDTl4W Lo GATE s.a-.,b,.. ENLARGED OEXISTING SHELTER LOCATION ^; ..... SITE PLAN UNK FENCE N 1 ENLARGED SIZE PLAN A-3 at&t nE.cwno w.[e[e.sox[s[w womaa oww.,pry eEd wa[. � � i I 0 p I a x s . . ssrtr wow[u,wrtmvs,ro i I i .c ..ma.aurw.a a.areu L ww*rr sw,muucE e,cac+co¢cawwae¢nngcmr, ro ouanw wum.a��r. µ __�_� �—\...,..•___SL__� M...w..roa e,�.-� 1 GENERAL NOTES 3 3 GENERATOR PLAN 11-T I I =r«.ra,-T— ' �� `w�i w:"'o�..ewccn.nE.ro..,.weuc ASPEN MEADOW DA$ fA�12800155 6X1161H$iRffi OFM'ER CO BO'1(R GDT 14001.0 ENERATOR EXHAUST PIPE DESIGN 2 HANGER DETAIL .a scuF 4 GENERATOR ELEVATION M-1 EXHIBIT B REVIEW CRITERIA 800 MEADOWS ROAD 26.575.130.F. Review standards. The following standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a) All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. b) Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. c) No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. d) No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Staff Finding: No additional telecommunications equipment is proposed in this application. There are no towers or roof-mounted equipment proposed. The proposed generator is to support existing equipment and will be located within the existing parking garage, complying with all setbacks. Staff finds these criteria to be met. 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: a) Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. Exhibit B—Telecommunications Review Standards 800 Meadows Road Page 1 of 5 b) Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. c) The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. d) If the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). e) Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. Staff Finding: The proposed generator does not affect the height of existing telecommunications equipment. There are no additional antennas proposed in this application. The proposed generator will be located within the existing parking garage, and will almost entirely be concealed from view. The generator will require a vent pipe to the exterior of the structure. It will extend 10' above the finished floor of the tennis courts. Stafffands these criteria to be met. 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a) If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials of the principal use. b) Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). c) Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. d) Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or Exhibit B—Telecommunications Review Standards 800 Meadows Road Page 2 of 5 reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. e) All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). Staff Finding: The proposed generator will have a grey housing to match the existing parking garage and will be placed on steel beams to preserve the architectural integrity of the existing structure. The generator requires a vent pipe to the exterior of the parking garage. The vent pipe will be black steel and route through an existing opening. The proposed generator and vent pipe will have minimal effect on the exterior appearance of the structure. Staff finds these criteria to be met. 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a) If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. b) Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. c) Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. d) All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Staff Finding: The proposed generator does not affect any mountain ridge lines, view planes, vegetation or topography of the area. The generator will not have any effect on the existing FCC compliance. Staff finds these criteria to be met. 5. Screening. Roof-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a) Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision- Exhibit B—Telecommunications Review Standards 800 Meadows Road Page 3 of 5 making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). b) For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility. c) Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. d) Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. Staff Finding: The proposed generator will not be visible unless inside the parking garage. No additional screening will be necessary to conceal the generator. Staff finds these criteria to be met. 6. Lightingand nd signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a) The light source for security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. b) Light fixtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. Exhibit B—Telecommunications Review Standards 800 Meadows Road Page 4 of 5 c) The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. d) The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. Staff Finding: There is no lighting or signage other than public safety warnings proposed as part of this application. Staff finds these criteria to be not applicable. 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a) No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality of the original design. b) The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. c) The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. Staff Finding: The Aspen Meadows PUD requires 97 parking spaces. The proposed generator will not decrease this number. No vehicular or pedestrian circulation will be affected by the proposed location of the generator. The proposed generator is surrounded by bollards and can be accessed by the general public. However, the generator has lockable control panel doors for security. Staff finds these criteria to be met. Exhibit B—Telecommunications Review Standards 800 Meadows Road Page 5 of 5 THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: December 1, 2014 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. ❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete. Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. 1) Deposit of$1,300 2) Digital copy of the application. Other submission items may.be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2741 if you have any questions. qU, ry eminick, n Technician City of A nit evelopment Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No Subdivision,or PD(creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging at&t Date. 12/01/14 Authorization and Consent AT&T Site:ASPEN MEADOWS FA#12800155 800 Meadows Road,Aspen CO 81611 The undersigned Aspen Institute manager hereby consents to and authorizes General Dynamics,its employees,representatives,agents and consultants to enter upon the Property and conduct maintenance, repairs,and/or changes within its leased area. General Dynamics IT Wireless Services is authorized to obtain any documentation,application,including but not limited to leasing,zoning,building permit,or other approval necessary to permit AT&T ability to complete its upgrade on Aspen Institute's property at 800 Meadows Road for the Zoning and Building approvals and permits for the installation of aback-up generator. AUTHORIZATION AND CONSENT HEREBY/A�P�PROVED THIS 5f DAY of f 2014 Aspen Institute Manager: (Authorize Signature of Aspen In to Management) (Printed ame of AspepAnstitute Management (Title) THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: November 26, 2014 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for-a Wireless Facility Review to eland a current operation at the Aspen Meadows and reviewed it for completeness. Your Land Use Application is incomplete: /> Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. 1) The owner of the property is the Aspen Institute. A letter consenting to the application from them is required. 0 Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any- questions. i Tha I You Ie er PhAn,n, Deputy Planning Director City of Aspe , Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No Subdivision, or PD(creating more than l additional lot) GMQS Allotments ' Residential Affordable Housing Yes No 7C Commercial E.P.F. Lodging 7— t e . Agreement t® Pay A licat'®n 0 �P � Anagreement between the City of Aspen "Ci and VAN Property New Cingular Wireless dba AT&T Phone No.:303-357-1342 Owner("I"): as Lesee of Aspen Institure Inc. Email:Roxy.Colette@GDIT.com Address of Aspen Meadows Billing General Dynamics Property: 800 Meadows Road, Address: 6664 South Dateland Drive, STE B (subject of Aspen CO 81611 (send bills here)Tempe AZ 85283 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $0 flat fee for Select Dept $0 a flat fee for_Select Dept $0 B flat fee for Select Dept $0 flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specked hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated: $ 1 ,300 deposit for 4 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$325 per hour. $ deposit for 0 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour City of Aspen: Property Ow r• h Chris Bendon Community Development Director ame: l City Use: 1 300 Title: Fees Due:$ Received:$ • %ECEIV ED NOV25 �014 ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION crry®F�u PROJECT: !i i 1�EN f ucytL PPENT Name: MM W r Location: Indicate street address,lot&block number,legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID# UIRED 7 !2 1700 APPLICANT: Name: �f Address: ef e 55 Phone#: Enke �i��t 1 3a� '39/' 7333 REPRESENTATIVE: /1 Name: C Address: ,$ Phone#: 03 7 360 TYPE OF APPLICATION:(please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ® Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA—8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane F1 Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: descri tion of existin buildin s,uses, revious rovals,etc. W•�G ,nfnv&71 softs i f d / ♦ J PROPOSAL: dessccrition of proposed buildin s,uses,modification etc. e G i� ,✓ /' or � � S Cd � ✓ 4S ff ( t H ve you attached the following? FEES DuE:$ Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement ❑/ Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards M 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. Atal ATTACHMENT 32"e DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM *01/ C® 2�.1 Project: K qe,� Gj't?l ��¢ Applicant: y, Location: S _Kead Zone District: We4t. !C Lot Size: 2 6 rG Lot Area: ;'re ¢ Sc a' ' (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes.Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) L —Sc'l' / ' Commercial net leasable: Existing: ��935Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: (f:; Pro posed.• Number of bedrooms: Existing: 6 Proposed: O Proposed% of demolition(Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: o ��e Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: U A e- On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: cJe_ %Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: N1� — %Open Space: Existing: Required. Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: _ Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required. Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: o Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed:; Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: Ala gy ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: As Peot_,,46Ar-hJ_51e*?& o Applicant: Of Location: S _4— Zone District: 4 !G Lot Size: <,?4 Lot Area AIA Fre leaf' sme &D k IS (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements,and steep slopes.Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Ili Commercial net leasable: Existing: o P Number of residential units: Existing: 0 Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: b Proposed: U Proposed% of demolition(Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: t4o -q G Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: oe Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed:40e On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed:,' CKJe % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed.- �cJ % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed:&V Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed:� t7J2 Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: 11V/J Variations requested: r E� E D_J NOV 242014 CITY OF ASPEN MRAUNIT Y ORIFIOPMEN-1 ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the in second column. These numbers correspond to the key on page 9. For multiple reviews, do not duplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collated packets. All drawings must include an accurate graphic scale Type of Review App.Submission Requirements Process Type(See Process Number of Required Submittal See key on page 9. Description in Att.S) Packets 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1-7, 8-10,35 P&Z 10 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION 1-7,8-10,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 . STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12,35 P&Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE(Based 2 for 0 Admin.,10 for P&Z on Location STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION 1-7,$ 10, 11, 12,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW 1-7, 13 14,35 P&Z 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE 1-7, 15, 16,35 P&Z 10 CONDITIONAL USE 1-7,9, 17 P&Z 10 SPECIAL REVIEW* 1-7, Additional Submission Req.depend P&Z 10 on nature of the Special Review Request. SUBDMSION 1-7, 18, 19,20,21,35 P&Z,AND CITY COUNCIL 20 EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20 21, 35 CITY COUNCIL 10 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7, 22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 LOT SPLIT 1-7,22 CITY COUNCIL 10 CODE AMENDMENT 14,7, 23 P&Z,AND CITY COUNCIL 20 WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7, 16, 24, 25, 26, 27 35 ADMIN.OR P&Z 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z SATELITE DISH OVER 24"IN 1-7 ADMIN.OR P&Z 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z • DIAMETER RES.DESIGN STANDARDS 1-7, 9, 28, 29,30 P&Z OR DRAG 10 VARIANCE GMQS EXEMPTION* 1-7,Additional Submission Req.depend ADMIN.,OR P&Z,AND/OR CC 2 for Admin.,10 for P&Z,20 for P on nature of the Exemption Request. (BASED ON EXEMPTION TYPE &Z and CC CONDOMINIUMIZATION 1,31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2 PUD 1-7,32,33, 35 CONCEPTUAL-P&Z,AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC(Submit FINAL-P&Z,AND CC Separately for Final PUD Review) LODGE PRESERVATION PUD 1-7,35 P&Z,AND CC 20 NOV 2 4 20'4 CITY OF ASPS K -MUNI l Y OEVFLOPW,'E- � F • Vicinity Map Highlighting the parcel where the proposed work will take place. f I �r Parcel Info: l Parcel: 273512129008 Account: R014027 f ='- Owner: ASPEN INSTITUTE INC Location: Aspen View Assessor s Page for this Property Zoom to x; A!part a I n"fituta ------ y aapke At oralm I i T._inF and Harris HaFI .inkl Kim nl�r Fo r Hall County of Pitkin & City of. n1 Esri, HERE, DeL NOV 242014 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY OEVELOPMEW' Aspen Meadows - Generator Property Address: 800 Meadows Road,Aspen CO, Wireless Facility Review Standards responses for the Generator Project Scope: The Applicant would like to add a ground mounted generator to support telecommunications equipment that is already in place within the Aspen Meadows parking garage as required by the FCC 07-177, emergency and catastrophe preparedness regulation passed following Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy for first responders and emergency communications. The parking garage already has approved cellular support equipment, but the new generator is in a different portion of the garage. The model will be a natural gas generator, and conduit routing will follow existing conduit in the parking structure. Generator exhaust ventilation will extend vertically and outside of the parking structure. The applicant and Land lord both approved of the proposed location using a currently "dead space" corner of the structure that will not diminish the number of necessary parking spaces. Section F. Review Standards 1. Setbacks. There will be no work on the facility's antennas or equipment other than to set the emergency back-up Generator and feed lines to the existing equipment.The proposed Generator placement does not encroach within the property setback requirements of the jurisdiction.The placement of the Generator is all but completely hidden from view outside of the garage(Photo Simulations included with application),and is completely hidden from the Public Right of Way. 2. The Proposed Generator addition does not affect the height of the antennas,equipment or overall facility. 3. Architectural Compatibility. Aesthetic and Architectural compatibility have been considered for this project. Due to the parking structure being consistent grey concrete the generator shall have a grey housing as well.The Architectural integrity of the existing structure was considered and the generator will be placed on steel beams rather than pouring a concrete pad. 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. The project does not affect any Ridgelines,View Planes or visual elements of the natural environment.On this project no vegetation is disturbed and this will not affect additional RF or electromagnetic emissions. 5. Screening. Deemed Unnecessary for this project as it is not visible from the public Right of Way and has minimal to no visual impact outside of the structure. NOV 2 4 2014 CGTY OF ASPEN C1u"a�`�t1IMITY OPROPAIR i CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Jim Pomeroy,429-2745 DATE: 08/29/14 PROJECT: 800 Meadows Road REPRESENTATIVE: Roxy Colette, (303) 357-1342 OWNER: General Dynamics, 99 Inverness Drive East, Ste 100, Englewood 80112 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Wireless Telecommunications DESCRIPTION: The Applicant would like to add a ground mounted generator to support telecommunications equipment that is already in place within the Aspen Meadows parking garage. The parking garage already has approved cellular support equipment, but the new generator is in a different portion of the garage. Along with the diesel generator itself, there may be exterior mounted conduit and piping, as well as an exhaust vent that will extend vertically past the roof of the parking garage. The applicant has shown that the project will not diminish the number of necessary parking spaces per the PUD, however that was not done through a new survey or drawing. In the application,the applicant will be required to answer the criterion found in section 26.575.130.F,Review Standards. Land Use Code Section(s) to Address in Application: 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.575.1 Wireless Telecommunications Services Facilities and Equipment 26.710.150 Commercial (C-1) Zone District Below is a link to the Land Use Code for your convenience: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and- Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience. http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/O/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%2Oand%2OFees/2013%2 Oland%20use%20app%20form.pdf Review by: Staff for completeness. Community Development Director for administrative review Public Hearing: N/A Referral Agency Fees: N/A .fir �w NOV2 2 4 2014 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY 0EVELOPMER'T Total Planning Deposit Due: $1,300 for 4 hrs. of Community Development staff time (additional hours are billed at a rate of$325 per hour) Total Deposit: $1,300 Total Number of Applications: 2 copies To apply, submit the following information: 0 Total Deposit for review of application. 0 Pre-application Conference Summary. (This Document) F-1 Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. D Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages,judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. If the property is condominiumized a letter from the HOA is required. D A survey of the property along with a site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. Q An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. 0 A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application (§26.575.130 D-F). D Elevation drawings or"before and after"photographs/drawings simulating and specifying the location and height of proposed equipment and any other accessory uses, fences, and signs. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory only and is not binding on the City. The opinions contained herein are based on current zoning and regulations,which are subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not, in any way, create a legal or vested right. kz� at&t General Site Info Site Name: ASPEN MEADOWS FA Number: 1014 Address : 800 Meadows Road,.Aspen CO 81611 Project Scope: Install back-up power generator at existing wireless facility. Jurisdiction:City of Aspen, Pitkin County CO b at&t Date. 11/11/14 Authorization and Consent AT&T Site:ASPEN MEADOWS FA#12800155 800 Meadows Road,Aspen CO 81611 The undersigned New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC dba AT&T Mobility manager hereby consents to and authorizes General Dynamics,its employees,representatives,agents and consultants to enter upon the Property and conduct maintenance,repairs,and/or changes within its leased area. General Dynamics IT Wireless Services is authorized to obtain any documentation,application,including but not limited to leasing,zoning,building permit,or other approval necessary to permit AT&T ability to complete its upgrade. AUTHORIZATION AND CONSENT HEREBY APPROVED THIS l 14_1DAY of A)Ve -t,3e-2 .2014 AT&T Mobility Manager: Evaristo Gomez Authorized Signature of AT&T Management) (Printed Name of AT&T Management) Evaristo Gomez"Evie" At&t Mobility Roxy Colette Sr Specialist-Tech Project Mgmt"RMR" SiteXcquisitionTVlanager --` "'-` VE Cell#720-289-4342 E po Desk#303-391-7333 General Dynamics Wireless Services 2535 East 40"AVE. C1222 99 Imemess Drive East, STE4100 Englewood, CO 80112 NOV 2 4 2014 Denver,CO80205 (303) 357-1342 Direct at&t (720) 360-6847 GD Mobile CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPIMEN"1 211B Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 AFXC No.: FA12800155 Effective date of research: 10/06/2014 IN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED REQUEST FOR TITLE RESEARCH Matters affecting the subject real estate which do not directly appear among the land records, or are not indexed to the exact listed name and legal description described are not included in this research. This is not a commitment for insurance nor is it an opinion on marketability of title. Subject to terms and conditions at TitleSearch.com. Copies of the related filings should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. Please read the index listing shown or referred to in this research and any review, summary or comments attached to the research carefully. The report, reviews, summary and/or comments provide you with notice of matters that may be of interest discovered at the time of research. It is important to note that this research is not a written representation as to the conditions of title and may not list all liens, defects,and encumbrances affecting title to the land. The type of research conducted for this report is: 1 Industry Standard One Owner Search ( ) 2. Industry Standard Two Owner Search ( ) 3. industry Standard Chain of Title,Deeds ( ) 4. Other,Customized Research as Outlined (X) --------- ---------------------- Research Authorized by: Dave Pelligrinelli AFXC, EVPO C Irn! NOV2 4 2014 1 CITY OF 9ASP N' GftUNITY DEVELOPINIE I 211 B Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 SECTION A The land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is as follows: A. Title to estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: B. ASPEN INSTITUTE INC AKA ASPEN INSTITUTE FOR HUMANISTIC STUDIES C. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of COLORADO County of PITKIN, and is described as follows: D. LOT IA,ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, IN THE COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AS SHOWN ON PLAT RECORDED 04/11/2006, BOOK 78 PAGE 35 OF PLATS AND LOT IB, ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION IN THE COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, AS SHOWN ON PLAT RECORDED 02/25/2010, BOOK 93 PAGE 35 OF PLATS E. Recorded on 02/19/1992 as Instrument No. 669/725 of Official Records F. Subject to any easements and restrictions of record 2 L 211 B Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 SECTION A-1 ASSESSMENTS & TRANSFERS ITEM NO. 1 : Property taxes, including general and special taxes,personal property taxes, if any,and any assessments collected with taxes,for the fiscal year shown below as follows: Fiscal year: 2013 PAY 2014 IST HALF PAID $69,871.52 2ND HALF PAID $69,871.52 Total Assessed Value: $14,672,000.00 Assessment No.: R014027 Total Assessed Value: $72,500.00 Assessment No.: R 014 0 2 8 ITEM NO. 2: DEED from JOHN H ROBERTS JR to ASPEN INSTITUTE FOR HUMANISTIC STUDIES Consideration: $100.00 Dated: 10/24/1985 Recorded: 12/05/1985 as Instrument No.: 500/904 of Official Records ITEM NO. 3: BARGAIN AND SALE DEED from SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP to ASPEN INSTITUTE INC Consideration: $10.00 Dated: 01/06/1992 Recorded: 01/24/1992 RERECORDED 02/19/1992 as Instrument No.: 667/835,669/725 of Official Records END OF SECTION A IMPORTANT INFORMATION PLEASE REFER TO"SECTION B"AND THE"NOTES AND CONSIDERATIONS SECTION'FOR ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OF INTEREST 3 211 B Tank Farm Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 SECTION B AT THE DATE HEREOF ENCUMBRANCES FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THE PERIOD OF RESEARCH FOR THIS REPORT WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: Property taxes,including general and special taxes,personal property taxes,if any,and any assessments collected with taxes,to be levied. Supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes,if any,assessed pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code ITEM NO. 1: NO OPEN LOANS WERE FOUND FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE RESEARCH CONDUCTED ITEM NO.2: A Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below and any other obligations secured thereby: Amount: $5,000,000.00 Dated: 12/01/1994 Trustor: ASPEN INSTITUTE INC Trustee: THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY Beneficiary: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND Recorded: 12/06/1994 RERECORDED 01/26/1995 as Instrument No.: 768/676,772/584 of Official Records ITEM NO. 3: A UCC shown below: Creditor: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND Recorded: 12/06/1994 as Instrument No.: 768/713 of Official Records ITEM NO. 4: A UCC shown below: Creditor: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND Recorded: 12/06/1994 as Instrument No.: 768/719 of Official Records ITEM NO. 5: A UCC shown below: Creditor: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MARYLAND 4 211 B Tank Farm Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 Recorded: 12/06/1994 as Instrument No.: 768/723 of Official Records ITEM NO. 6: A UCC shown below: Creditor: NORWEST BANK COLORADO NA Recorded: 10/12/1998 as Instrument No.: 423133 of Official Records ITEM NO. 7: PLAT Dated: 10/24/1985 Recorded: 10/31/1985 as Instrument No.: 17/85 of Official Records ITEM NO. 8: PLAT-THE ASPEN MEADOWS Dated: 12/15/1991 Recorded: 01/24/1992 as Instrument No.: 28/5 of Official Records ITEM NO. 9: THE ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Recorded: 01/24/1992 as Instrument No.: 667/731 of Official Records ITEM NO. 10: DECLARATION AND GRANT OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF USER Dated: 01/06/1992 Recorded: 01/24/1992 as Instrument No.: 667/814 of Official Records ITEM NO. 11 : DECLARATION AND GRANT OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF USER Dated: 01/06/1992 Recorded: 01/24/1992 as Instrument No.: 667/820 of Official Records ITEM NO. 12: RAW WATER AGREEMENT 5 211 B Tank Farm Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 19 ,:, ,. _w Dated: 01/06/1992 Recorded: 01/24/1992 as Instrument No.: 667/828 of Official Records ITEM NO. 13: SHARED FACILITY AGREEMENT to HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC Dated: 01/02/1992 Recorded: 01/24/1992 as Instrument No.: 667/853 of Official Records ITEM NO. 14: TRENCH, CONDUIT AND VAULT AGREEMENT to HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION INC Dated: 06/10/1992 Recorded: 07/30/1992 as Instrument No.: 684/887 of Official Records ITEM NO. 15: LOTS I AND IB, FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ASPEN MEADOWS FINAL SPA DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT Dated: 12/04/1992 Recorded: 12/17/1992 as Instrument No.: 30/17 of Official Records ITEM NO. 16: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Dated: 05/12/1991 Recorded: 09/30/1994 as Instrument No.: 762/811 of Official Records ITEM NO. 17: PLAT AMENDMENT 2 Dated: 08/29/1995 Recorded: 08/31/1995 as Instrument No.: 38/13 of Official Records ITEM NO. 18: PLAT AMENDMENT 3 Dated: 03/14/1996 Recorded: 09/06/1996 as Instrument No.: 40/25 of Official Records ITEM NO. 19: PLAT AMENDMENT 4 Dated: 06/22/1999 Recorded: 07/19/1999 6 2116 Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 as Instrument No.: 50/49 of Official Records ITEM NO. 20: RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Recorded: 03/02/2000 as Instrument No.: 441031 of Official Records ITEM NO. 21 : SUBSURFACE EASEMENT AGREEMENT to MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC Dated: 07/20/1999 Recorded: 10/02/2000 as Instrument No.: 447579 of Official Records ITEM NO. 22: AMENDMENT AGREEMENT Dated: 10/08/2003 Recorded: 10/29/2003 as Instrument No.: 490408 of Official Records ITEM NO. 23: RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION Dated: 07/14/2004 Recorded: 08/12/2004 as Instrument No.: 500714 of Official Records ITEM NO. 24: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Dated: 11/22/2004 Recorded: 01/21/2005 as Instrument No.: 506235 of Official Records ITEM NO. 25: PLAT AMENDMENT 5 Dated: 03/05/2005 Recorded: 04/18/2005 as Instrument No.: 72/68 of Official Records ITEM NO. 26: AMENDMENT TO ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Dated: 04/15/2005 Recorded: 04/18/2005 as Instrument No.: 509066 of Official Records ITEM NO. 27: ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL 7 211B Tank Farm Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 Dated: 11/14/2005 Recorded: 04/11/2006 as Instrument No.: 522844 of Official Records ITEM NO. 28: PLAT AMENDMENT 6 Dated: 02/06/2006 Recorded: 04/11/2006 as Instrument No.: 78/35 of Official Records ITEM NO. 29: AMENDMENT TO ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Dated: 04/10/2006 Recorded: 04/11/2006 as Instrument No.: 522846 of Official Records ITEM NO. 30: HOLY CROSS ENERGY CONTRACT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE Dated: 03/07/2006 Recorded: 04/11/2006 as Instrument No.: 522849 of Official Records ITEM NO. 31 : UNDERGROUND RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT to HOLY CROSS ENERGY Dated: 03/04/2006 Recorded: 04/11/2006 as Instrument No.: 522850 of Official Records ITEM NO. 32: TRENCH, CONDUIT AND VAULT AGREEMENT to HOLY CROSS ENERGY Dated: 03/04/2006 Recorded: 04/11/2006 as Instrument No.:. 522851 of Official Records ITEM NO. 33: RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Dated: 02/08/2006 Recorded: 05/19/2006 as Instrument No.: 524234 of Official Records ITEM NO. 34: HOLY CROSS ENERGY CONTRACT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE Dated: 07/13/2007 Recorded: 08/17/2007 as Instrument No.: 5411.75 of Official Records 8 M: 211 B Tank Farm Road, San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 ITEM NO. 35: RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Dated: 11/12/2008 Recorded: 01/16/2009 as Instrument No.: 555801 of Official Records ITEM NO. 36: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN Dated: 02/23/2009 Recorded: 03/25/2009 as Instrument No.: 557467 of Official Records ITEM NO. 37: RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Dated: 01/14/2009 Recorded: 03/26/2009 as Instrument No.: 557529 of Official Records ITEM NO. 38: REVOCABLE ENCROACHMENT LICENSE APPLICATION Dated: 06/01/2009 Recorded: 06/24/2009 as Instrument No.: 560200 of Official Records ITEM NO. 39: PLAT AMENDMENT 7 Dated: 10/26/2009 Recorded: 01/05/2010 as Instrument No.: 92/97 of Official Records ITEM NO. 40: AMENDMENT TO ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIFICALLY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Dated: 12/18/2009 Recorded: 01/05/2010 as Instrument No.: 565856 of Official Records ITEM NO. 41: PLAT AMENDMENT 8 Dated: 10/06/2009 Recorded: 02/25/2010 as Instrument No.: 93/35 of Official Records 9 ti 211 B Tank Farm Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 ITEM NO. 42: AMENDMENT TO ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT&SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Dated: 03/09/2009 Recorded: 02/25/2010 as Instrument No.: 567221 of Official Records ITEM NO. 43: AMENDMENT TO ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT&SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Recorded: 07/29/2014 as Instrument No.: 612170 of Official Records ITEM NO. 44: NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT Recorded: 08/07/2014 as Instrument No.: 612421 of Official Records ITEM NO. 45: PATRIOT SEARCH: ASPEN INSTITUTE-NO RESULTS END OF SECTION B 10 IAWW&O ;'A 211 B Tank Farm Road,San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Toll Free: 877-848-5337 Fax 800-201-0620 NOTES AND CONSIDERATIONS AT THE DATE HEREOF RECORDINGS AND NOTES OF INTEREST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THE PERIOD OF RESEARCH FOR THIS REPORT WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: NOTE NO. 1: NAMES SEARCHED FOR THE INCLUDED RESEARCH ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. ASPEN INSTITUTE INC 2. ASPEN INSTITUTE FOR HUMANISTIC STUDIES 3. SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 4. JOHN H ROBERTS JR 5. 6. 7. 8. ITEM NO. 2: ALL RESEARCH CONTAINED HEREIN IS LIMITED TO THE DATES SEARCHED AS FOLLOWS START DATE: 04/18/1984 END DATE: 10/06//2014 --END REPORT 11 Offce of Foreign Assets Control Sanctions List Search This Sanctions List Search application("Sanctions List Search)is designed to facilitate the use of the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list("SDN List)and the Foreign Sanctions Evaders List("FSE List).The Sanctions List Search tool uses appro>amate string matching to identify possible matches between word or character strings as entered into Sanctions List Search,and any name or name component as it appears on the SDN List and/or the FSE List Sanctions List Search has a slider-bar that maybe used to set a threshold(.e.,a confidence rating)for the closeness of any potential match returned as a result of a users search.Sanctions List Search will detect certain misspellings or other incorrectly entered ted,and wilt return near,or prozmate,matches,based on the confidence rating set by the user via the slider-bar.OFAC does riot provide recommendationswith regard to the appropriateness of any specific corfdence rating.Sanctions List Search is one tool offered to assist users in hdilizing the SDN list ardor the FSE List;use of Sanctions List Search is rot a substitute for uidertaking appropriate due diligence.The use of Sanctions List Search does not limit anycriminal or civil liability for any act undertaken as a result of,or in reliance on,such use. Download the SDN List Visit The OFAC Website Download the FSE List Lookup Type: All Address: j Name: aspen institute City: ID g: State/Province:' Program: �qp Country: Ali j BALKANS List: All IBELARUS J BURMA^ Minimum Name Score: 100 Search Reset.. Lookup Results:0 Found Name Address Type Program(s) List Score v Your search has not returned any results. 'U.S.states are abbreviated on the SDN and FSE lists.To search fora specific U.S.state,please use the two letter U.S.Postal Service abbreviation. SDN List last updated on:9130201410:13:02 AM FSE List last updated on:2/82014 10:48:08 AM 1 of] 10/8/2014 3:25 PM RECEPTION#: 61217029/2014 at 03:34:37 PM, 1 OF 3, R $21W Janice K. Vos Cau Pitkin County, CO NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION,LOT 1-A;COMMONLY KNOWN AS ASPEN MEADOWS,845 MEADOWS ROAD Parcel ID:2735-121-29-008 APPLICANT: Aspen Institute 1000 N.Third St.Aspen,CO 81611 970-544-7906 REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis,Curtis&Associates 300 E.Hyman Ave.Aspen,CO 81611 970-319-0442 SUBJECT& SITE OF APPROVAL: Insubstantial Planned Development (PD) Amendment at 845 Meadows Road,Aspen CO 81611. ZONING: Academic/SPA SUMMARY: The applicant requests an Insubstantial Planned Development(PD)(formerly known as Specially Planned Area/SPA)Amendment to the Aspen Meadows SPA.The amendment will allow the conversion of the southeastern clay tennis court shown in Exhibit A—Site Plan,to a storage area for the maintenance equipment.Changes to the clay court include covering the surface in gravel and installation of golf cart charging stations.The existing partial fence between the two courts will be extended to fully enclose the remaining clay court and screen mesh netting matching the existing mesh will be installed.An additional mesh screen will be added to the existing screen on the perimeter of the storage area to screen the area from public view. The storage area would be used year round. Stored equipment would be covered with canvas tarps in the winter months and the court would he plowed to allow for access to the stored items. The outdoor storage area would be occasionally used as an overflow lot for special events and would be manned by valet staff only.No new buildings are proposed by the applicant. STAFF EVALUATION: The operating needs of Aspen Meadows have changed in the 23 years since the development was approved. The parking garage, constructed in 1992, has been utilized for operational,maintenance and storage needs.As a result,21 spaces of the approved 97 are no longer being used in a manner consistent with Ordinance 14 of 1991 and the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision approval documents.The conversion of the clay court to a storage area for the equipment currently stored in the parking garage will reinstate the approved parking spaces for the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision. RECEPTION#: 612170 29/2014 at 03:34:37 PM, 2 OF 3, . • Janice K. Vos Caudi W Pitkin County, CO spaces. The number of tennis courts are not specified in Ordinance No. 14, Series 1991 and the Aspen Meadows SPA. The changes will not change to character or use of the PD. The proposed changes are consistent with the intent with the SPA document.Staff finds the review criteria for an Insubstantial PD Amendment are met,as described in Exhibit B. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for an Insubstantial PD Amendment as noted above and on Exhibit A to be consistent with the review criteria(Exhibit B)and thereby,APPROVES the request. APPRO D BY: Chris Bendon,Community Development Director Date �- Attachments: Exhibit A-Site Location(recorded) Exhibit B-Insubstantial PD Amendment Review Criteria(not recorded) Exhibit C-Application(not recorded) RECEPTION#: 612170, 29/2014 at 03:34:37 PM, 3 OF 3, • Janice K. Vos CaudiqpPitkin County, CO 1 1 it r j p m }hy g 02 1 ur 3 2 a 0 T fl In TZ Ij r 'Oily,•� _ x 0 i M C u ¢ r 1 s C 1v I c F o a u M I I Fl 7.1iThe Aspen Institute-Aspen Meadows Above Ground Storage RECEPTION#: 612421, 08/07/2014 at 03:07:35 PM, 1 OF 3, R $200 Janice K. Vos Cauda Pitkin County, CO • NOTICE OF APPROVAL FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION,LOT 1-B ACADEMIC FACILITY AND AUDITORIUM;COMMONLY KNOWN AS ASPEN MEADOWS,845 MEADOWS ROAD Parcel ID:2735-121-29-809 APPLICANT: Aspen Institute 1000 N.Third St.Aspen,CO 81611 970-544-7906 REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Curtis,Curtis&Associates 300 E.Hyman Ave.Aspen,CO 81611 970-319-0442 SUBJECT& SITE OF APPROVAL: Insubstantial Planned Development (PD) Amendment at 845 Meadows Road,Aspen CO 81611. ZONING: Academic/SPA SUMMARY: The applicant requests an Insubstantial Planned Development(PD)(formerly known as Specially Planned Area/SPA)Amendment to the Aspen Meadows SPA.The amendment will memorialize the Buckminster Fuller geodesic dome.The dome,which has existed on the Aspen Institute property since the 1960s,when it was used as a pool cover.In 1992, the pool was decommissioned and the dome was moved to an area south of the Crown and Arco Lodge buildings,where it fell into disrepair,until it was restored in 2011. After the dome was restored it was relocated to its present location east of Andersen Park, as shown in Exhibit A — Site Location. Restoration included repair of the frame and covering the dome in weatherproof canvas.The site was graded to level the surface and a pad of crusher fines(small,compacted rock)was placed for the dome floor.Tree removal was not required. The dome is used during the summer for smaller Institute functions such as meetings and retreats.The dome is canvas covered and the cover does not fully extend to the crusher fines floor.Furthermore,it is not a conditioned space and does not have electricity. An exterior electric box outside is near the dome and available to those utilizing the facility. STAFF EVALUATION: Geodesic domes have a long history at the Aspen Institute.Buckminster Fuller erected a geodesic dome during the 1952 International Design Conference. After the conference the dome was disassembled and relocated to Woods Hole,MA.A second canvas-covered RECEPTION#: 612421, 07/2014 at 03:07:35 PM, 2 OF 3, • Janice K. Vos Caudi 0 Pitkin County, CO dome was built in 1955 to cover a swimming pool located south of the Meadows Reception Center. Due to damage from the elements,the canvas cover was removed in the 1960s.In 1992,the swimming pool was in a state of disrepair and was filled in.The dome was then moved south of the Crown and Arco Lodge buildings.In 2011,the dome was restored and moved to a treed,private area with better proximity to existing Institute facilities. Restoration of the seasonal dome did not convert the space into a habitable, conditioned space;therefore,no dimensional changes,such as an increase of floor area, resulted from the restoration of the dome. The geodesic dome,despite its long history on Institute grounds, was not addressed in either the Aspen Meadows SPA or Ordinance 14,Series of 1991. However,because of its history and importance at the Aspen Institute;Staff funds that memorialization of the restored dome is consistent with the original approvals. Relocation of the facility to a more accessible location is considered a minor change.Staff finds the review criteria for an Insubstantial PD Amendment are met,as described in Exhibit B. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for an Insubstantial PD Amendment as noted above and on Exhibit A to be consistent with the review criteria(Exhibit B)and thereby,APPROVES the request. APP Chris Bendon,Community Development Director Date Attachments: Exhibit A—Site Location(recorded) Exhibit B—Insubstantial PD Amendment Review Criteria(not recorded) Exhibit C—Application(not recorded) - i � -n�♦�VT� ��, � .N=S' ��fi In a1/'-� i " rte`rtmc Argy%i . I I M G U l T l f • C I V I C P O F V LI ,. F-I n F�; The Aspen Institute-Aspen Meadows Buckminster Fuller Dome ofpO 'Aqunoo uT3nTdTpne� sop •x aOTuer £ 30 £ 'Rd S£:LO:£0 3e DIOZ/LO/80 'TZ6Zi9 :#HOISd3OaH Aspen Meadows - Generat®r Property Address: 800 Meadows Road,Aspen CO, Wireless Facility Review Standards responses for the Generator Proiect Scope: The Applicant would like to add a ground mounted generator to support telecommunications equipment that is already in place within the Aspen Meadows parking garage as required by the FCC 07-177, emergency and catastrophe preparedness regulation passed following Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy for first responders and emergency communications. The parking garage already has approved cellular support equipment, but the new generator is in a different portion of the garage. The model will be a natural gas generator, and conduit routing will follow existing conduit in the parking structure. Generator exhaust ventilation will extend vertically and outside of the parking structure. The applicant and Land lord both approved of the proposed location using a currently "dead space" corner of the structure that will not diminish the number of necessary parking spaces. Section F. Review Standards 1. Setbacks. There will be no work on the facility's antennas or equipment other than to set the emergency back-up Generator and feed lines to the existing equipment.The proposed Generator placement does not encroach within the property setback requirements of the jurisdiction. The placement of the Generator is all but completely hidden from view outside of the garage(Photo Simulations included with application),and is completely hidden from the Public Right of Way. 2. The Proposed Generator addition does not affect the height of the antennas,equipment or overall facility. 3. Architectural Compatibility.Aesthetic and Architectural compatibility have been considered for this project.Due to the parking structure being consistent grey concrete the generator shall have a grey housing as well.The Architectural integrity of the existing structure was considered and the generator will be placed on steel beams rather than pouring a concrete pad. 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. The project does not affect any Ridgelines,View Planes or visual elements of the natural environment. On this project no vegetation is disturbed and this will not affect additional RF or electromagnetic emissions. 5. Screening.Deemed Unnecessary for this project as it is not visible from the public Right of Way and has minimal to no visual impact outside of the structure. 0 0 6. No lighting will be proposed and signage is restricted to Public Safety as required and is standard practice on this Generator Project. 7. Access Ways. The proposed emergency generator does not have a net effect on the existing number of parking spots,nor vehicle maneuvering area. The generator's proposed placement does not interfere with pedestrian circulation and is open to emergency services access without interfering with emergency vehicle access, ingress or egress. Applicant's Representative Information available for questions clarifications and concerns Roxy Colette Site Acquisition Manager General Dynamics Wireless Services (303)357-1342 Direct (720)360-6847 GD Mobile Roxy.ColetteC@GDIT.com www.gdwireless.com