Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.601 E Hopkins Ave.0047.2014.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0047.2014.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 073 80 001 PROJECTS ADDRESS 601 E HOPKINS AVE PLANNER INTERN - JONATHAN CASE DESCRIPTION COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE A4 ARCHITECTS A DATE OF FINAL ACTION 8.15.14 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.6.15 i •- OO 27 3� • 073 eon?• 2oc�• l�i1 ?ermits reL � -.. m" $ t I Ftle%£Euri Recon Na rgate Fomti�Rmarts Forma pper�}} 3� j)7 � - Main Custom Fteld�.' Routing Status,Fee,,Summary a Act anG „Routing Hrdory;°` :-„ o Permrt type aslu Aspen Land Use � Permit !0017 2014-ASLU xddress 601 E HOPKIIJS ;xpt Sude City ASPENState ICO , Zig 1611 I �e N y Z � 'Permit Information „.1 � ',� t OMaster permd Routing queuasjig lu07 s Applied Qat?-2014 ` `E E �z Pra}ed Statue pending APProted s o s °Deccnphon APPLICATIQId FOR COMMERICAL DESIGN REb1E:v " Issued tr , r1 Closed,6na1 �� -,Iinitted A4 ARCHITECTS 970 96+6760 CIocY;Running Days F 0 fires Oa:22"2Q1, Os ner -task namR C+FiIJ HARR]S A&ELAINE I 'First name ,IPO BOX 4060 ASPEN CO 61612 t Phan + ) hddress: g £ _ ,applicant g Owner is applicant? ❑Contractor is applicant? l �� _ Last name CAHfd HARRIS.4&ELAJIJE( krst,name SE'!PO BOX 4060 fl ASPC 51612 cs i Phone .f 9 Cust t 122940 i Addra n Lender 71l h Last name First name j Ph one::( Address R c r I F C ,. � As enGoltl5 server'an etas 1 of 1 t- �Displaystheperm�tlender'saddressr � � s � �,� �� '7PA 1 L� � I _ AWAAk Lr) <r/ 0 ;44S Z<vS 4 SSo •O S DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section.26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Bass Cahn 601, LLC; 601 East Hopkins Ave., Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name; Mailing Address 601E Hopkins Ave Lots A & B Block 99• Parcel ID 2737-073-80-000 through -004. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property P&Z granted Final Commercial Design Review approval with conditions to remodel the exterior of the building by replacing and improving_garden-level amenities. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission; approval granted on 8/5/14 via P&Z Resolution# 12, Series of 2014. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) August 21 2014 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) August 22 2017 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 15th day of August, 2014, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director.. Chris Bendon, Community Development Director AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ,L d. fill, Vock, / Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I bI �Ct M�NL_sname pleaseprint) ..being or representing an Applicant tohe City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: _11Publication of notice: 'By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (144) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publicati n is attached hereto. Signature The for omg "Affidavit of Notice" as actj w edged befo e e thi�/�aay of (_. , 200_ y �c� J U'Lf'l.G� J WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC My commission expires: L DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL I Notice is hereby given to the general public of the n QQ approval of a srte specific development plan,and T the creation of a vested property right pursuant to Qua � the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title ` 24,Article 68,Colorado Revised Statutes,pertain Notary Public ing to the following legally described property:601 1�A� E.Hopkins Ave.Lots A&B,Block 99,Parcel ID KAREN REED 2737-073-80-000 through-004. On August 5th, - PATTERSON 2014,the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission OTARY P �'( granted Final Commercial Design Review approval N UBLIC for the remodel of a portion of theexisting building, STATE OF COLORADO including replacing exterior cladding,painting the ATTACHMENTS building,and renovating garden-level public amen; I NOTARY ID ties.For further information contact Amy Simon,at #199640027'67 the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 1. My 60s , If99�gbt{le 6f 2018 429-2758.alena St,Aspen,Colorado(970) In - r - - '-OPY OF THE PUBLICATION s/City of Aspen - Publish in The Aspen Times on August 21 st,2014. Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on August 21,2014(10471250) RESOLUTION # 12, SERIES OF 2014 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) APPROVING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR 601 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, CITY AND TOWNSITE 01 ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-80-000 through -004, WHEREAS, the applicant, Bass Cahn 601, LLC, represented by Michael Hassig, RA, of A4 Architects, LLC, has requested Final Commercial Design Review approval for 601 E. Hopkins Ave. Lots A & B, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS,the property is located within the C-1 Commercial Zone District; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "[the] Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the applicant will be notified in writing of this, and a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission...shall be scheduled" and WHEREAS, for Final Commercial Design Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission must review the application, a staff analysis report, and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040.A.2, Commercial Design Standards Review Procedure, of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision; and WHEREAS, Jonathan Hayden, in his staff report dated July 31, 2014, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards, the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines are met with conditions; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on August 5, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the applicable review standards and approved the application by a vote of 66=0, with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Final Commercial Design Review for the property located.at 601 E. Hopkins Ave. Lots A & B, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, with the following conditions: 1. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved. 2. The applicant will apply a monochromatic paint scheme to the building exterior 3. The copper roof remains as currently installed. 4. The new exterior wood covering to remain as shown in exhibit 1(a). P&Z Resolution No. 12, Series of 2014 RECEPTION#: 612654, 08/15/2014 at 601 East Hopkins Ave. 03:57:46 PM, Page 1 of 4 1 OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K, Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO o ¢ c O � � A4 C1 k - 111 1I -- '-�;�,,,.... _._._.,,,� �,- �.�w:• 4 ' � �� o III I •. x W '0—ELE.wm W STELF-01 i t _ l GLl I[I� - — TFI I. I i I TTIII I'1! �, - ;C� N�ORMwEST CORNER�EXS!/x0 i 5 i wEST ELEVAtlO•v-ExISTMp I �°0°'GOO`°0OV^ .1 7dEE }Eeu Ging `• M ELEVATION SOUMWESTOORNER EXISTING Rellular Meeting Aspen City Council September 8 2014 Mayor Skadron said the request for a sound barrier has come up previously. Mr. Skalko said there are thorough construction mitigation requirements and they will adhere to all standards. Mayor Skadron asked why is five years vesting necessary. Mr. Skalko replied there is concern with possible changes or economic events that may prevent building. It does not extend the construction period. Mayor Skadron asked what recourse the neighbors have should development not adhere to the rules. Mr. True said they can address the matters-with the construction management administrator with the engineering department. Any noise issue can be brought to environmental health. Mayor Skadron said he is sensitive to Dr. Block's comments. The community's interest is not being served because the preservation incentives being offered have been quite aggressive. He is sensitive to the Block's but something will.be done and what is proposed tonight will have less of an impact on the west end and will be less that what could be seen. He received a text from Councilman Romero and he said after reading the packet he generally supports: Mayor Skadron said he supports as well. The applicant asked for two TDRs to help offset the construction costs. Councilwoman Mullins said she can support two TDRs. Councilman Frisch said he supports one but two works as well. Councilman Daily said he is comfortable with one. Mayor Skadron agreed with one. Councilman Frisch moved to adopt Ordinance#21, Series of 2014; seconded by Councilman Daily. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Daily,yes; Frisch,yes; Mullins;yes; Mayor Skadron, yes. Motion carried. Action Items 601 E Hopkins-Commercial Design Review-Notice of Call-up 620 E Hyman Avenue—Commercial Design Review—Notice of Call-up Councilwoman Mullins asked if Staff feels the materials adhere to the guidelines. Ms. Phelan replied yes. They suggested expanded use of materials at 601 but the board did not feel it was necessary. No Call up. Vacation Rental Permit Report—The update was a requirement of the program: Resolution #109,Series of 2014—Approval of purchase of an affordable housing unit at 947 W Hallam Street Barry Crook said this unit was purchased by the City and deeded to APCHA for the affordable housing pool. The owner died and the unit is now owned by his brother who,is not eligible. The unit is not in a condition to sell. No certificate of occupancy has ever been issued. The current owner is not interested in doing the work to get the CO. The solution the City came up with is to offer the same amount of money the brother.paid and his current out of pocket costs. The City would assume ownership and do the work and put the unit back into the program to sell. There is a cost and a loss to City but less than the other options out there. It is prudent for the City to assume the burden and resell. Councilman Daily said it is the best alternative. Councilwoman Mullins moved to adopt Resolution#109, Series of 2014; seconded by Councilman Frisch. All in favor, motion carried. Councilwoman Mullins moved to adjourn at 7:45 pm; seconded by Councilman Daily. All in favor, motion carried. Linda Manning—City Clerk 9 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council THRU: Jennifer Phelan,-Deputy Planning Directory FROM: Jonathan Hayden, Planning Intern RE: Notice of Call Up - P&Z approval of Final Commercial Design Review for 601 East Hopkins Avenue, P&Z Resolution #12, Series of 2014 MEETING DATE: September 8, 2014 BACKGROUND: On August 5, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) approved Final Commercial Design Review for.a commercial development at 601 East Hopkins Avenue. The existing structure consists of three stories, the lowest of which is recessed. approximately two feet from the sidewalk level and is connected to a similarly recessed public amenity space. All three building levels contain commercial space exclusively. The applicant proposed to renovate select aspects of the building exterior and public amenity space, including: • Removing the building's copper wainscot and its backup framing and sheathing • Installing 14-foot-tall "Parklex Facade"high-density timber-faced siding panels • Painting the building exterior in a dark, monochromatic finish • Renovating the garden level stairs, fence, and log railing • Installing two picnic tables for public use • Removing an existing awing above the south-facing, garden level windows The project was heard by P&Z and approved on August 5th by a vote of 6-0. Copies of the approved elevations are attached as Exhibit A. The P&Z Resolution and minutes are attached as Exhibits B and C, respectively. PROCEDURE: This is not a public hearing and no staff or applicant presentation will be made at the August 19th Council meeting. If you have any questions about the project, please contact Deputy Planning Director, Jennifer Phelan, at (970)-429-2759, or jennifer.phelan@cityofaspen.com. Pursuant to Section 26.412.040(B), notification of this P&Z approval must be placed on City Council's agenda within 30 days, or as soon thereafter as is practical under.the circumstances. City Council has the option of exercising the Call Up provisions outlined in Section 26.412.040(B) within 15 days of notification on the regular agenda. City Council may vote to Call Up the project at their September Bch or September 22nd meeting. If City Council does not exercise the Call Up provision, the P&Z Resolution shall stand., `ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Approved Design Exhibit B: P&Z Resolution #12, Series of 2014 Exhibit C: P&Z minutes from August 5th, 2014 A4 1� 1� 1� 1� LUTIT 7d 7H I I I 1� 11 1 111 1� �I 1� I 111 1 1� d I 0� �I I I. I IMill , ra�n�a,onEa.,„ I I 'MIA s - " te"'M �o ----------- ,: ,.: x,,.v ..0 >.. a '\ ----------------------- A --------- LL-—-T-—-------—-—- -—-—- -— ------ (D NORTH ELEVATION �nl WEST ELEVATION Y TBAW • — -- -- ---- ,� g"�`"5"1s- ny Vic?' ...;�..a .. ».._. i ,4� a tirAiy 691 East M pk ns Ave. { •~ F rst Floor NORTHWEST CORNER-EXISTING 5 WEST ELEVATION-EXISTING Ae n.Colorado r rxa.wssu. s,res,izm aF t 78/11K E. I, • .» ro�aE a. ,r ..MEN r ..——..--_---- - �. � "c a i r air r FT71H � � I HEB NBuilding ,o�„E,a�o `:W„o�, . `"E u�,�..,.,�,,..a „E.� .oaEAE,a own -~ F __ "✓- I,1 Elevations &1 SOUTH ELEVATION - �cl SOUTHWEST CORNER-EXISTING A 3.1 U ,w.,o �J —LEGEND— GRAPHIC LEGEND—GRAPHIC SCALE o -Liym vwe ?�✓� � P4/ �\ m -rerevnone vee Wafer SPgd l •LRr n ^ (,P OP"ir 00'R_ ',� Cor eler lI / _� yn I ee fwrgreen i (ervri uee" cps[ane Ni5'B9'!/W Aejoiner Property[;ne l re /� B0.W Sheet Cenhdne / 12 / / / 1® �•.{� T—1.4 B-Idi/,,eKEYNOTES-NEW WORK farden/ILevel Baenmen! FIF.STSANK'TEhANT SPACE �:• / gEPa.v syssrPwrEurv[rcEo wa o..,,/.�,.•,u..�r�.,�a,s Eo r„eEAe,r� nsrau xc,«c�r,sms r,.ron�u ecxss TOANK 601 East,dpkins Ave A:Pens l-do ,o R-1 aErml,ZrLn",, • �s E"� _ l Block G 11 Site Plan A 1.1 RESOLUTION# 12, SERIES OF 2014 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) APPROVING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR 601 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-80-000 through-004, WHEREAS, the applicant, Bass Cahn 601, LLC, represented by Michael Hassig, RA, of A4 Architects, LLC, has requested Final Commercial Design Review approval for 601 E. Hopkins Ave. Lots A & B, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS,the property is located within the C-1 Commercial Zone District; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "[the] Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the applicant will be notified in writing of this, and a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission...shall be scheduled" and WHEREAS, for Final Commercial Design Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission must review the application, a staff analysis report, and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040.A.2, Commercial Design Standards Review Procedure, of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. 'The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision; and WHEREAS, Jonathan Hayden, in his staff report dated July 31, 2014, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards, the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines are met with conditions; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on August 5, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the applicable review standards and approved the application by a vote of 66=0, with conditions. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Final Commercial Design Review for the property located at 601 E. Hopkins Ave. Lots A & B, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, with the following conditions: 1. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved. 2. The applicant will apply a monochromatic paint scheme to the building exterior 3. The copper roof remains as currently installed. 4. The new exterior wood covering to remain as shown in exhibit 1(a). P&Z Resolution No. 12, Series of 2014 RECEPTION#: 612654, 08/15/2014 at 601 East Hopkins Ave. 03:57:46 PM, Page 1 of 4 1 OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO M ! Section 1 All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation. presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 2: This Resolution shall not affect.any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 5th day of August, 2014. Stan Gibbs, Vice Chair App oved as to Form: Debbie Quinn,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Cindy Clob,Records Manager List of Exhibits: • 1(a)—Exterior Elevations • 1(b)—Site Plan P&Z Resolution No. 12, Series of 2014 601 East Hopkins Ave. Page 2 of 4 o ¢ o w � M n. a, A4 � N � 1 I l u q ',; � '„,,,,;•'I � � s i 1 / ,IIS t �r ° h I 0 0 I I �.. O it I Cd I ;,/ y ;2., WEST ELFVARON i W i_II� TI�1- i I [l iafl Jul1 ' ,'� NORTHWEST CORNER-EXSTING WEST ELEVATION�EXISTHVO � ,,��� '1 .- a /' �. tom! ... ;� - 7 .:I �1";'•du f - Bui:cfi ._..e.... ' .........., wr,...r.,._„ br r:a�E• ?`{ � iE r'/ E—tions i3•. SOVMELEVATION a, SOU WEST CORNER-EXISTING --^ 3•1 -- ..- - -LEGEND _-- O � aA4 ' o a GROMC 3CAU It 0 I oj°ol^.Pea - _.�- J City = ....._—..i ! Site Plan A 1.1 Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission August 5, 2014 Stan Gibbs,Vice-Chair, called the meeting to order at 4:30 PM with members Jasmine Tygre, Ryan Walterscheid, Brian McNellis, Keith Goode and Jason Elliot present. Also present from City staff;Debbie Quinn,Jennifer Phelan and Jonathan Hayden. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Ms.Tygre noted she had observed the new pits located at the Gondola Plaza intersection and urged the other commissioners to also take a look at them. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Phelan asked the commissioners to consider schedulinga special meeting on Tuesday,.September 91h 2014 in,the Rio Grande meeting room for the possible continuance of the Sky Hotel Review.The room has been reserved at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments. MINUTES - July 1, 2014 Ms.Tygre moved to approve the July 1, 2014 minutes, seconded by Mr. Goode. All in favor, motion carried. MINUTES - July 15,2014 Mr. McNellis asked for a modification on page 15 to clarify his statement regarding the barriers at the end of the mall. Mr. Elliot moved to approve the July 15, 2014 minutes with the modification,seconded by Mr.Walterscheid. All in favor, motion carried. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST There were none. Public Hearing - 601 E. Hopkins Ave. - Commercial Design Standards Mr. Gibbs opened the public hearing. Ms. Quinn.reviewed the affidavits of public notice and they are appropriate. They affidavits will be included as exhibit E in the final file. Mr. Hayden provided the background and.summary of the applicant's request including existing height of exterior wall sections and the materials proposed for the exterior walls. Staff is concerned with the consistency of the materials applied since only select facades of the building will have the new siding. They do not want a bunch of different styles for the building. Mr. Gibbs asked if there were any questions for staff,which there were none. 1 Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission August 5, 2014 Mr. Gibbs turned the floor over to the applicant. Mr. Michael Hassig is representing the applicant. He stated the owner wants to make minor exterior changes including removing.the copper wainscot, painting all facades, including the top area of the building,with a color and installing new siding panels on the prominent walls of the building. He reviewed the.areas to be changed shown on Exhibit 1(a). Mr. Gibbs asked if there were any questions for the Mr. Hassig. Ms.Tygre asked what color will be used. Mr. Hassig stated the paint color will be a neutral dark green and the final selection will be made to match the new siding material. Mr. Gibbs asked if they had considered replacing the copper roof over the entrance of the building. Mr. Hassig stated the project only considered the walls of the building and not the roof. Mr. Gibbs then asked for any public comment.There was no comment. Mr. Gibbs asked staff for any rebuttal or clarification of the applicant's presentation.There was none. Mr.Gibbs opened the discussion between commissioners. Ms.Tygre stated she did not agree with staff and supported the proposed minor exterior upgrades to the building. The commissioners then identified the following additions to the resolution below#1 under the paragraph beginning with "Now,Therefore..." 2. The exterior paint'design will include anew monochromatic color scheme. 3. The copper roof remains as currently installed. 4. The new exterior wood covering to remain as shown in exhibit 1(a). Mr. Walte.rsch.eid moved to approve Resolution #12,Series 2014 approving the Final Commercial Design Review including the additions identified above. Mr. Goode seconded. Roll call vote; Mr. Gibbs,yes; Ms. Tygre,yes; Mr. Walterscheid,yes; Mr. McNellis,yes; Mr. Goode;yes; Mr. Elliot,yes. All in favor, motion carried. Mr. Gibbs then adjourned the meeting. Cindy Klob City Clerk's Office, Records Manager 2 Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission August 5, 2014. Stan Gibbs,Vice-Chair, called the meeting to order at 4:30 PM with members Jasmine Tygre, Ryan Walterscheid, Brian McNellis, Keith Goode and Jason Elliot present. Also present from City staff; Debbie Quinn,Jennifer Phelan and Jonathan Hayden. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Ms.Tygre noted she had observed the new pits located at the Gondola Plaza intersection and urged the other commissioners to also take a look at them. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Phelan asked the commissioners to consider scheduling a special meeting on Tuesday, September 9`h 2014 in the Rio Grande meeting room for the possible continuance of the Sky Hotel Review.The room has been reserved at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments. MINUTES - July 1, 2014 Ms.Tygre moved to approve the July 1, 2014 minutes, seconded by Mr.Goode. All in favor, motion carried. MINUTES - July 15, 2014 Mr. McNellis asked for a modification on page 15 to clarify his statement regarding the barriers at the end of the mall. Mr. Elliot moved to approve the July 15, 2014 minutes with the modification, seconded by Mr.Walterscheid. All in favor, motion carried. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST There were none. Public Hearing - 601 E. Hopkins Ave. - Commercial Design Standards Mr. Gibbs opened the public hearing. Ms. Quinn reviewed the affidavits of public notice and they are appropriate. They affidavits will be included as exhibit E in the final file. Mr. Hayden provided the background and summary of the applicant's request including existing height of exterior wall sections and the materials proposed for the exterior walls. Staff is concerned with the consistency of the materials applied since only select facades of the building will have the new siding. They do not want a bunch of different styles for the building. Mr. Gibbs asked if there were any questions for staff,which there were none. 1 Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission August 5, 2014 Mr. Gibbs turned the floor over to the applicant. Mr. Michael Hassig is representing the applicant. He stated the owner wants to make minor exterior changes including removing the copper wainscot, painting all facades, including the top area of the building,with a color and installing new siding panels on the prominent walls of the building. He reviewed the areas to be changed shown on Exhibit 1(a). Mr. Gibbs asked if there were any questions for the Mr. Hassig. Ms.Tygre asked what color will be used. Mr. Hassig stated the paint color will be a neutral dark green and the final selection will be made to match the new siding material. Mr. Gibbs asked if they had considered replacing the copper roof over the entrance of the building. Mr. Hassig stated the project only considered the walls of the building and not the roof. Mr. Gibbs then asked for any public comment.There was no comment. Mr. Gibbs asked staff for any rebuttal or clarification of the applicant's presentation.There was none. Mr. Gibbs opened the discussion between commissioners. Ms.Tygre stated she did not agree with staff and supported the proposed minor exterior upgrades to the building. The commissioners then identified the following additions to the resolution below#1 under the paragraph beginning with "Now,Therefore..." 2. The exterior paint design will include a new monochromatic color scheme. 3. The copper roof remains as currently installed. 4. The new exterior wood covering to remain as shown in exhibit 1(a). Mr. Walterscheid moved to approve Resolution #12,Series 2014 approving the Final Commercial Design Review including the additions identified above. Mr. Goode seconded. Roll call'vote; Mr. Gibbs,yes; Ms. Tygre,yes; Mr.Walterscheid,yes; Mr. McNellis,yes; Mr. Goode, yes; Mr. Elliot,yes. All in favor, motion carried. Mr. Gibbs then adjourned the meeting. Cindy Klob City Clerk's Office, Records Manager 2 A Rub! wv✓w.parklex.com Parklex'Facade Dado que Parklex esti constituido basicamente por maderas nobles, los colorer y el veteado de las diferentes particles pueden sufrir las variaclones naturales de Is madera. Parklex is manufactured from fine timber veneers,therefore the colour and grain of different batches will exhibit natural variations. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jonathan Hayden, Planning Intern THROUGH: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: 601 E Hopkins—Final Commercial Design Review Resolution No._, Series of 2014 MEETING DATE: August 5, 2014 APPLICANT/OWNER: Bass Cahn 601, LLC Horsefins LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Michael Hassig, RA A4 Architects, LLC r . LOCATION: r 601 E Hopkins Ave. Lots A & B, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen e� CURRENT ZONING: Photos: 601 E Hopkins building and location. C-1, Commercial zone "� . ;"` n. district f ` r i SUMMARY: The Applicant requests, final commercial design review ' ` ,» . for exterior renovations to the three-story building and3 adjacent garden level at 601 ? $ ' FA�AK E. Hopkins Ave. , STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ` r yp Approval, with conditions. ,� 4 . 601 E. Hopkins Ave—Final Commercial Design P&Z Memo Page 1 of 4 REQUEST OF THE PL_<1NNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission to redevelop the site: • Final Commercial Design Review for development involving commercial uses, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412.050, Commercial Review, and pursuant to the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority.) BACKGROUND AND PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes minor exterior renovations to a three-story, split-level commercial building that include replacing siding, removing copper cladding, and repairing garden level amenities. The property is located on the southeast corner of East Hopkins Avenue and South Hunter Street. Existing Conditions: The existing structure consists of three stories, the lowest of which is recessed approximately two feet from the sidewalk level and is connected to a similarly recessed public amenity space. All three building levels contain commercial space exclusively. There are two main entrances to the buildings: 1) Access from East Hopkins Avenue includes a short flight of stairs up to a lobby on the second level; and 2) Access from South Hunter Street by means of exterior stairs or ADA compliant ramp down to the recessed first level. ' The building's exterior was originally finished in stucco, brick, wood trim, and a steep mansard roof. In 1993, a 7-foot high decorative weathered-copper wainscot was added to portions of the north, west, and south building elevations. This wainscot encroaches onto the sidewalk right of way approximately 5 inches, which necessitated an encroachment license from the city in 1993. Proposed Development: The applicant proposes to renovate select aspects of the building exterior and public amenity space, including: • Removal of the copper wainscot and its backup framing and sheathing • Installation of 14-foot-tall "Parklex Facade"high-density timber-faced siding panels • Replacement of existing damaged concrete stairs to recessed public amenity space • Replacement of existing log guardrail between sidewalk and recessed public amenity space • Replacement of existing 5-foot wood fence between garden level and alley parking areas with a 3'6"-high fence • Installation of two new picnic tables in the public amenity space • Removal of a small awning on the first floor of the south-facing facade 601 E. Hopkins Ave—Final Commercial Design P&Z Memo Page 2 of 4 STAFF COMMENTS: FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW: The project is required to comply with the standards set forth in section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards, as well as the Final Review Guidelines of the Commercial section of the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. The project must comply with standards in three main areas: Building Design &Articulation, Architectural Materials, Paving and Landscaping. Building Design and Articulation: As noted in the guidelines, form and scale of a building is further articulated by the vertical expression of a "base, middle, and cap." The current weathered-copper wainscot—extending just five feet above sidewalk level—creates the perception of an abbreviated first floor or"base." The proposed replacement of this copper wainscoat with timber-composite siding panels that rise fourteen feet above sidewalk level will provide a much more pronounced "base" consistent with other well-articulated commercial frontages in the area. This will then allow for a more well proportioned"middle"that extends up to an existing parapet or"cap." With regard to street level character the design guidelines emphasize that the building should "respect the heights of traditional building design" with distinguishable differences in levels of the buildings. This includes a street level that is generally taller than upper floors, including storefronts of "13 to 15 feet high." While the existing structure's split-lever layout does not include a traditional "street level," the proposed timber-composite siding will create the appearance of a traditional commercial first-floor, rising to 14 feet above sidewalk level. Architectural Materials: The guidelines recommend that durable, quality materials be used in the development of new buildings and that "the palette of materials adopted for all facades of a.building should reflect, complement and enhance the evolving form and character of the center city." The proposed addition of timber-composite paneling constitutes a high-quality material that is both durable and aesthetically appealing. Although not traditional materials to the Victorian era, this material is a throwback to older Aspen structures constructed of wood. Staff is concerned, however, with applicant's proposal to cover only select facades with this paneling. Large portions of the exterior on northeast and,southeast sides of the building will remain covered with existing stucco only, and applicant's proposal does not contemplate removing or replacing the existing copper roof covering the entryway. Further inconsistency is evident in the building's cornice, which is simply painted plywood. Staff is primarily worried that this creates an amalgamation of different styles and materials that doesn't convey the sort of character appropriate in the downtown commercial area. As the Commercial Character Area Design Guidelines point out, "A single building with multiple style imitations to break up the facade of the building is inappropriate." Paving and LandscapinjZ: The guidelines encourage paving and landscaping that enhances the immediate setting of the project. In this case, the public amenity is adjacent to the street right of way within a courtyard. The project proposes the replacement or repair of existing elements like concrete stairs, guardrails, and fencing, as well as the addition of two new picnic tables for public use in the garden area. 601 E. Hopkins Ave–Final Commercial Design P&Z Memo Page 3 of 4 RECOMMENDATION: Overall, Staff supports the changes in materials that have been presented, but would like to see a more comprehensive implementation of these materials. The materials and proposed treatment of them provide features that are more akin to the design guidelines than current conditions, but the proposal does not constitute a design treatment that incorporates high-quality materials throughout. Staff recommends approval of the project, under the condition that the paneling is extended to cover a greater proportion of building facades, and that,the existing copper roof above the entryway is removed and replaced with materials that are consistent with the proposed paneling. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution # , Series 2014, approving Final Commercial Design Review for the project located at 601 E Hopkins Ave." Attachments: Exhibit A— Staff Findings, Final Commercial Design Review Criteria Exhibit B — Staff Findings, Final Commercial Design Guidelines Exhibit C—Application Exhibit D—Elevation drawings 601 E. Hopkins Ave—Final Commercial Design P&Z Memo Page 4 of 4 Exhibit A Commercial Design Review—Land Use Code Review Criteria Sec. 26.412.050. Review criteria. An application for commercial design review may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: A. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, or any deviation from the standards provides a more appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested design elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the standards. Staff Finding: The proposed development meets most Commercial Design Standards required of Section 26.412.060 of the Land Use Code, but does not adequately address the Standards in a comprehensive manner (see Exhibit B). B. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, to the greatest extent practical. Changes to the fagade of the building may be required to comply with this Section. Staff Finding: Stafffnds this criterion to be inapplicable. The building currently contains commercial space and will contain commercial space after the remodel and addition. C. The application -shall comply with the guidelines within the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines as determined by the appropriate Commission. The guidelines set forth design review criteria, standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The City shall determine when a proposal is in compliance with the criteria, standards"and guidelines. Although these criteria, standards and guidelines are relatively comprehensive, there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be identified. In such a case, the City must determine that the intent of the guideline is still met, albeit through alternative means. (Ord. No. 13, 2007, §1) Staff Finding: The proposed development is submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for Final Commercial Design Review. Staff finds most applicable guidelines are met or can be met with a conditioned approval. Please see Exhibit B for a more detailed analysis of this project's compliance with Commercial Design Guidelines. Staff finds the criterion is not fully met. Sec. 26.412.060. Commercial design standards. The following design standards, in addition to the commercial, lodging and historic district design objectives and guidelines, shall apply to commercial, lodging and mixed-use development: Exhibit A—Commercial Design Review—Land Use Code Review Criteria Page 1 of 4 I A. Public amenity space. Creative, well-designed public places and settings contribute to an attractive, exciting and vital downtown retail district and a pleasant pedestrian shopping and entertainment atmosphere. Public amenity can take the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights-of-way or private property within commercial areas. Staff Finding: Pursuant to Section 26.575.030.B, the proposed redevelopment is exempt from Public Amenity provisions because the project proposes no change to the building footprint. On parcels required to provide public amenity, pursuant to Section 26.575.030, Public amenity, the following standards shall apply to the provision of such amenity. Acceptance of the method or combination of methods of providing the public amenity shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, according to the'procedures herein and according to the following standards: 1. The dimensions of any proposed on-site public amenity sufficiently allow for a variety of uses and activities to occur, considering any expected tenant and future potential tenants and uses. StaffFinding: Regulation inapplicable pursuant to Section 26.575.030.B 2. The public amenity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this characteristic, public seating, outdoor restaurant seating or similar active uses, shade trees, solar access, view orientation and simple at-grade relationships with adjacent rights-of-way are encouraged. Staff Finding: Regulation inapplicable pursuant to Section 26.575.030.B 3. The public amenity and the design and operating characteristics of adjacent structures, rights- of-way and uses contribute to an inviting pedestrian environment. Staff Finding: Regulation inapplicable pursuant to Section 26.575.030.B 4. The proposed amenity does not duplicate existing pedestrian space created by malls, sidewalks or adjacent property, or such duplication does not detract from the pedestrian environment. Staff Finding: Regulation inapplicable pursuant to Section 26.575.030.B 5. Any variation to the design and operational standards for public amenity, Subsection 26.575.030.F., promotes the purpose of the public amenity requirements. Staff Finding: Regulation inapplicable pursuant to Section 26.575.030.B B. Utility, delivery and trash service provision. When the necessary logistical elements of a commercial building are well designed, the building can better contribute to the overall success of the district. Poor logistics of one (1) building can detract from the quality of surrounding Exhibit A—Commercial Design Review—Land Use Code Review Criteria Page 2 of 4 properties. Efficient delivery and trash areas are important to the function of alleyways. The following standards shall apply: 1. A utility, trash and recycle service area shall be accommodated along the alley meeting the minimum standards established by Section 26.575.060, Utility/trash/recycle service areas, unless otherwise established according to said Section. Staff Finding: No changes to existing utility, trash, or recycle service areas are proposed, and current areas are compliant with the above regulation. Staff finds the criterion is met. 2. All utility service pedestals shall be located on private property and along the alley. Easements shall allow for service provider access. 'Encroachments into the alleyway shall be minimized to the extent practical and should only be necessary when existing site conditions, such as an historic resource, dictate such encroachment. All encroachments shall be properly licensed. Staff Finding: No changes to existing service pedestals are proposed, and current pedestals are compliant with the above regulation. Staff finds the criterion is met. 3. Delivery service areas shall be incorporated along the alley. Any truck loading facility shall be an integral component of the building. Shared facilities are highly encouraged. Staff Finding: No changes to existing service areas are proposed, and current service areas are compliant with the above regulation. Staff finds the criterion is met. 4-. Mechanical exhaust, including parking garage ventilation, shall be vented through the roof. The exhaust equipment shall be located as far away from the street as practical. Staff Finding: No changes to existing mechanical exhaust systems are proposed, and current systems are compliant with the above regulation. Staff finds the criterion is met. 5. Mechanical ventilation equipment and ducting shall be accommodated internally within the building and/or located on the roof, minimized to the extent practical and recessed behind a parapet wall or other screening device such that it,shall not be visible from a public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. New buildings shall reserve adequate space for future ventilation and ducting needs. (Ord. No. 13, 2007, §1) Staff Finding: No changes to existing mechanical ventilation equipment and ducting are proposed, and current equipment and ducting are compliant with the above regulation. Staff finds the criterion is met. See. 26.412070.Suggested design elements. The following guidelines are building practices suggested by the City, but are not mandatory. In many circumstances, compliance with these practices may not produce the most desired development, and project designers should use their best judgment. Exhibit A—Commercial Design Review—Land Use Code Review Criteria Page 3 of 4 I A. Signage. Signage should be integrated with the building to the extent possible. Integrated signage areas already meeting the City's requirements for size, etc., may minimize new tenant signage compliance issues. Common tenant listing areas also serves a public way-finding function, especially for office uses. Signs should not block design details of the building on which they are placed. Compliance with the City's sign code is mandatory. B. Display windows. Display windows provide pedestrian interest.and can contribute to the success of the retail space. Providing windows that reveal inside activity of the store.can provide this pedestrian interest. C. Lighting. Well-lit (meaning quality, not quantity) display windows along the first floor create pedestrian interest after business hours. Dynamic lighting methods designed to catch attention can cheapen the quality of the downtown retail environment. Illuminating certain important building elements can provide an interesting effect. Significant light trespass should be avoided. Illuminating the entire building should be avoided. Compliance with the City's Outdoor lighting code, Section 26.575.150 of this Title, is mandatory. Staff Finding: Any signage and outdoor lighting will be regulated via building permit review and issuance. The current building includes horizontal windows on the ground level that are relatively short in stature, rising only S feet above sidewalk level. While this does not reflect the character of a traditional retail commercial frontage, the windows are still fairly large and allow for a high level of facade transparency, which can contribute to the appearance of a retail environment. Staff finds this criterion is met. Exhibit A—Commercial Design Review—Land Use Code Review Criteria Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Commercial Design Guidelines—Final Design Review Guidelines for the Commercial Character Area Commercial Character Area Design Objectives: These are key design objectives for the Commercial Area. The City must find that any new work will help to meet them: 1. Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. Staff Finding: The Commercial Character Area is adjacent to the Commercial Core Historic District. The proposed renovations will replace a weathered-copper wainscot exterior with a timber-laminate paneling that is more consistent with structures in the Commercial Core Historic District. Staff finds this criterion is met. 2. Maintain a retail orientation. Staff Finding: The proposed redevelopment maintains commercial service uses along the ground floor, and the installation of high-density timber faced paneling (see below) will provide pedestrian interest and can contribute to the successful perception of retail space. Staff finds this criterion is met. 3. Promote creative, contemporary design. Designs should seek creative new solutions that convey the community's continuing interest in exploring innovations. At the same time, the fundamental principles of traditional design must be respected. This means that each project should strike a balance in the design variables that are presented in the following pages. Staff Finding: The proposed exterior renovations will replace an outdated decorative weathered-copper wainscot with a more contemporary high-density timber faced paneling that will align with the cornice of the main building entrance to visually establish a taller "first floor" that will become a "base"for the building that forms'a stronger relationship to the street. Applicant's proposal covers only select facades with this paneling, however. Large portions of the exterior on northeast and southeast sides of the building will remain clad with existing stucco only, and applicant's proposal does not contemplate removing or replacing the existing copper roof covering the entryway. Staff is primarily worried that this creates an amalgamation of different styles and materials that doesn't convey the sort of character appropriate in the downtown commercial area. Staff finds this criterion is not met. 4. Encourage a well-defined street wall. The intent is to more clearly establish a strongly defined street wall, but with some greater variety than in the Commercial Core Historic District since the historic building edge is not as defined. A stronger street facade definition should be achieved while at the same time recognizing the value of public dining and landscaped space. Staff Finding: The proposed high-density timber;faced paneling will strengthen the street wall definition by providing better articulation of the street facing fagades, but again,failure Exhibit B—Commercial Design Review—Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 1 of 6 to apply this material to all facades will create "gaps" in the street wall. Staff finds this criterion is not met. 5. Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. It is important that a range and variation in building height and scale in the Commercial Area be recognized in future developments. Larger buildings should be varied in height and reflect original lot widths. Staff Finding: No changes to building height or scale are proposed, so Guideline 5 is inapplicable to the applicant's proposal. 6. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. Providing space in association with individual buildings remains important, but should be balanced with much greater building street presence and corner definition. Staff Finding: The existing public amenity space is an accent to the established street wall that exists and is maintained. Proposed installation of two picnic tables for public use in the garden area will offer further opportunity for outdoor public use without interrupting the clear definition to the street edge. Staff finds this criterion is met. 7. Promote variety in the street level experience. Display cases, architectural details and landscaping are among the design elements that should be used. Staff Finding: The applicant proposes more variety in the project's street level experience than is currently present,. with installation of taller paneling that visually establishes a stronger building "base, " installation of two new picnic tables for public use in the garden area, and replacement of damaged and/or dilapidated stairs, guardrail, and fencing. Staff finds this criterion is met. Exhibit B—Commercial Design Review—Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 2 of 6 Commercial Character Area Final Review Design Guidelines Building Design and Articulation Staff Finding: As noted in the guidelines,form and scale of a building is further articulated by the vertical expression of a "base, middle, and cap. " The'eurrent weathered-copper wainscot— extending just five feet above sidewalk level—creates the perception of an abbreviated first floor or "base. " The proposed replacement of this copper wainscoat with timber-composite siding panels that rise fourteen feet above sidewalk level will provide a much more pronounced "base" consistent with other well-articulated commercial frontages in the area. This will then allow for a more well-proportioned "middle" that extends up to an existing parapet or "cap. " With regard to street level character the design guidelines emphasize that the building should "respect the heights of traditional building design" with distinguishable differences in levels of the buildings. This includes a street level that is generally taller than upper floors, including storefronts of"13 to 1 S feet high. " While the existing structure's split-level layout does include a traditional "street level, " the proposed timber-composite siding will create the appearance of a traditional commercial first floor, rising to 14 feet above sidewalk level. The multiple style imitations that would result in partial application of the timber-composite siding, .however, would break up the fagade of the building and fail to convey the sort of character appropriate in the downtown commercial area. Staff finds the following Guidelines are met: 1.30 The detailed design of the building fagade should reflect the traditional scale and rhythm of the block. This should be achieved using: • The fenestration grouping • The modeling of the fagade • The design framework for the first floor storefront • Variation in architectural detail/or the palette of fagade materials 1.31 A building should reflect the architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the fayade. • The design and definition of the traditionally tall first floor • The vertical proportions of the upper level fenestration pattern and ratio of solid wall to window area. 1.32 A building should reflect the three-dimensional characteristics of the street fagade in the strength and depth of modeling, fenestration and architectural detail. 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upper floors. • The first floor should be the tallest floor to floor height in the building. • The first floor of the primary fagade should be predominantly transparent glass. Exhibit B—Commercial Design Review—Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 3 of 6 • Upper floors should be perceived as being more opaque than the street level. Upper story windows should have a vertical emphasis. • Highly reflective or darkly tinted glass is inappropriate. • Express the traditional distinction in floor heights between street levels and upper levels through detailing, materials and fenestration. The presence of a belt course is an important feature in this relationship 1.36 Minimize the appearance of a tall third floor. 1.37 The first floor fagade should be designed to concentrate interest on the first level, using the highest quality of design, detailing and materials 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to maintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail. 1.42 Design of the first floor storefront should include particular attention to the following: • The basic element and proportions of storefront design. • Depth and strength of modeling • The palette of materials and finishes used in both the structural framework and the storefront window • The concentration of architectural detail to ensure a rich visual experience • The complementary use of signage and lettering to enhance the retail and downtown character • The use of lighting to accentuate visual presence Staff finds the following Guidelines are not applicable.- 1.29 pplicable:1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width (30ft.) as expressed by two or more of the following: • Variation in height at internal lot lines • Variation in the plane of the front facade • Street facade composition • Variation in architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the building module 1.33 Any new building should be designed to maintain a minimum of 9 feet from floor to ceiling on all floors 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level frontage. 1.38 The retail entrance should be at sidewalk level. 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures Exhibit B—Commercial Design Review—Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 4 of 6 • • 1.43 Retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the street frontage adjusted for the scale of space 1.44 A large building should reflect the traditional lot width in form and variation of its roof. This should be achieved through the following: • A set back of the top floor from the front fagade • Reflect the traditional lot width in the roof plane 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building Staff finds the following Guideline is not met: 1.40 Window area along the first floor shall be a minimum of 60%of exterior street facade area . when facing a principal street(s). Architectural Materials Staff Finding: The guidelines recommend that durable, quality materials be used in the development of new buildings and that "the palette of materials adopted for all facades of a building should reflect, complement and enhance the evolving form and character of the center city. " The proposed addition of timber-composite paneling constitutes a high-quality material that is both durable and aesthetically appealing. Although not traditional materials to the Victorian era, this material is a throwback to older Aspen structures constructed of wood. Application of these materials to only select portions of the building, however, creates an amalgamation of different styles and materials that doesn't convey the sort of character appropriate in the downtown commercial area. Staff finds the following Guidelines are met: 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed. 1.47 Building materials should have these features: • Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally. • Reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance visual interest if the facade. • Covey a human scale. • Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen's climate. 1.48 A building or addition should reflect the quality and variation in material seen traditionally. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are use they shall be: • High quality durability and finish • Detailed to convey a human scale • Compatible with a traditional masonry palette Exhibit B—Commercial Design Review—Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 5 of 6 Paving and Landscaping Staff Finding: The guidelines encourage paving and landscaping that enhances the immediate setting of the project. In this case, the public amenity is adjacent to the street right of way within a courtyard. The project proposes the replacement or repair of existing elements like concrete stairs, guardrails, and fencing, as well as the addition of two new pictnic tables for public use in the garden area. Staff finds the following Guideline is met: 1.51 Paving and landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building area. Exhibit B—Commercial Design Review—Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 6 of 6 RESOLUTION# XX, SERIES OF 2014 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) APPROVING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR 601 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-80-000 through -004, WHEREAS, the applicant, Bass Cahn 601, LLC, represented by Michael Hassig, RA, of A4 Architects, LLC, has requested Final Commercial Design Review approval for 601 E. Hopkins _Ave. Lots A &B, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, the property is located within the C-1 Commercial Zone District; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "[the] Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the applicant will be notified in writing of this, and a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission...shall be scheduled" and WHEREAS, for Final Commercial Design Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to detennine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040.A.2, Commercial Design Standards Review Procedure, of the.Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The Planning and Zoning Commission may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Jonathan Hayden, in his staff report dated July 31, 2014, perfonned an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards, the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines are met with conditions; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on August 5, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the application, found the application was consistent with the applicable review standards and approved the application by a vote of x-x, with conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Final Commercial Design Review for the property located at 601 E. Hopkins Ave. Lots A & B, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, with the following conditions: jj 1. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved. ` �9„' o Cv(c� r S�. p'^�✓ G o� C -0-P P&Z Resolution No. xx, Series of 2014 601 East Hopkins Ave. Page 1 of 4 0 Section 1 All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to. the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 2• This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of.the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 5th day of August, 2014. LJ Erspamer, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Cindy Klob;Records Manager List of Exhibits: O 1(a)—Exterior Elevations • 1(b)—Site Plan P&Z Resolution No. xx, Series of 2014 601 East Hopkins Ave. Page 2 of 4 CITY&SPEN 4,7. 2-o 14 . A" - PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY E�O1J yr C� PLANNER:. Jim Pomeroy, 970.429.2745 DAI PROJECT: 601 E. Hopkins, Exterior Remodel REPRESENTATIVE: Mark Chain,mchaingwsopris.net, 970-309-3655 MAY 2 7 2014 CITY OF ASPEN DESCRIPTION: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The applicant is interested in undertaking minor exterior changes to the building at 601 East Hopkins Ave, which is in the C- 1 Zone District. The potential scope includes removing some copper siding, and replacing it and other portions of the first floor with siding made of Ipe. Furthermore, the applicant may also be considering changing out some of the windows. The project will need to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission per Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Review, but, due to the limited scope, the applicant may bypass conceptual review and be reviewed only for final design. Please note, when bypassing conceptual review, City Council must be notified of the Director's decision, and afforded the opportunity for call-up. Much of the work is occurring within an Encroachment Agreement granted by the City (Reception #353677) in 1993. Therefore, a referral to the Engineering Department will be required. The applicant will need to address, by way of site plan, elevations, and other graphics or means as necessary, how the changes relate to the Commercial Design standards illustrated in Chapter 26.412 as well as the City's Commercial Character Area as posted on the City of Aspen's website in the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. A link to these documents is included below. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412.040 Commercial Design Review, Review Procedure See Also: Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines A copy of the Land Use Code is available at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines can be found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPlanning-and-Zoning/Current-Planning/ A copy of the Land Use Application is available at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%20land%20use%20app%20form Of Review by: Staff for complete application Planning and Zoning Commission for approval of Commercial Design Review; Public Hearing Referral Agencies: Engineering Planning Fees: $4,550 for 14 hours of staff time (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed / at a rate of$325/hour) Referral Agency Fees: $265 (1 hour) Total Deposit: $4,815 rToapply, submit the following inforoon: S ❑ Proof of ownership with payment. ❑ Signed fee agreement. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages,judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ HOA approval letter. ❑ Total deposit for review of the application. ❑ 10 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado, (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. ❑ Applications shall be provided in paper format(number of copies noted above) as well as the text only on either of the following digital formats. Compact Disk (CD)-preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk. Microsoft Word format is preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable or PDF. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. I _ • aC' 2cm 4 . ® fT DO, ® D D D Agreement to Pay Appfucafion Fees Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City")and R E ';"E 0 V Em D Property Harris Cahn Phone No.:(970)920-0007 MAY Owner("I"): Email:harris@cahnpartners.com 2 7 2014 Address of 601 SPEN 601 East Hopkins Ave. g P.O. Box 4060 ti Property: Address: C0 1lIt. Y ELMENT (subject of Aspen, CO 81611 (send bills here) Aspen, CO 81612 application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $,0 flat fee for Select Dept 0 Select Dept $_ flat fee for $0 flat fee for Select Dept $ flat fee for 0 Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. 4,550 deposit for 14 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$325 per hour. $ 265 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time.Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Propert Owner: Chris Bendon Michael Hassig, RA Community Development Director Name: Designated Representative for Owner City use: 4815 Title: Fees Due:$ Received:$ 2013 • o A 1 (9 70) RECEIVED PROJECT: ATTACHMENT 2—LAND USE APPLICATION MAY 2 7 2014 C Name: 601 East Hopkins Exterior Remodel COW4111Y DEFLOP XWT Location: 601 E. Hopkins Ave., Aspen, CO 81611 (Indicate street address, lot&block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) 2737-073-80-001 APPLICANT Name: Bass Cahn - 601 LLC Address: 601 E. Hopkins Ave., Aspen, CO 81611 Phone#: (970) 920-0007 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Michael Hassig, RA Address: 242 North Seventh St., Carbondale, CO 81623 Phone#: (970) 963-6760 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA—8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(& SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ® Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use ]EXISTING CONDITIONS: descri tion of existing buildings,uses previous approvals,etc.) ) Existing three story office building with existing encroachment license for exterior cladding. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc.) Replace existing copper cladding with stratified timber panels per elevations submitted. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 4,815.00 ® Pre-Application Conference Summary 0 Attachment#1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment#4, Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards ] 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5"X 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. barge scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 601 East Hopkins Exterior Remodel Applicant: Bass Cahn - 601 LLC Location: 601 E. Hopkins Ave., Aspen, CO 81611 Zone District: C-1 Lot Size: 60' by 100' Lot Area: 6,000 square feet (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 6,290 sf Proposed: NO CHANGE Number of residential units: Existing: NONE Proposed: NO CHANGE Number of bedrooms: Existing: NONE Proposed: NO CHANGE Proposed% of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: NO CHANGES PROPOSED TO EXISTING DIMENSIONS Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing. Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed.- Side roposed:Side Setback: Existing: Required.• Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required.--proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: EXISTING ENCROACHMENT LICENSE FOR COPPER CLADDING ON WEST FACADE- SEE ATTACHED DETAILED SURVEY. Variations requested: NONE q City of A#ems. General/*cling Permit Contact Sheet 130 South Galena Street,Aspen,Colorado 81611 THE CITY or ASPS Phone(970) 920-5090 Fax (970) 920-5440 PERMIT NO. PERMIT INFORMATION Job Address Permit Type 601 East Hopkins Ave., Unit 1, Aspen, CO 81611 Lot Block Tract or Subdivision Parcel ID(call 920-5160) Legal Description A& B 199 601 East Hopkins Condominiums 2737-073-80-001 CONTACT INFORMATION Phone No. Alternate Phone No. Name Bass Cahn -601, LLC (970) 920-0007 Mailing address City Zip 601 East Hopkins Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 E-mail Address harris@cahnpartners.com Name Phone No. Alternate Phone No. Michael Hassig, RA, A4 Architects, LLC (970) 963-6760 (970) 366-6476 Mailing address City Zip 242 North Seventh St. Carbondale, CO 81623 E-mail Address mhassig@a4arc.com Name Phone No. Alternate Phone No. B & H General Contractors, Casey Wilkings, Project Mgr. (970) 945-0102 (970) 618-5439 Mailing address City Zip 5317 C.R. 154, Suite 206 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 E-mail Address casey@bhgencon.com Name Phone No. Alternate Phone No. A4 Architects, LLC, Michael Hassig, RA, Partner in Charge (970) 963-6760 (970) 366-6476 Mailing address City Zip 242 North Seventh St. Carbondale, CO 81623 E-mail Address mhassig@a4arc.com • • e Name Phone No. Alternate Phone No. Mailing address City Zip E-mail Address 0UR&Or# Name "Pt.—ne No. Alternate Phone No. SGM, Inc., John Boulden, PE (Structural) (970) 245-2571 (970) 623-0430 Mailing address City Zip 2768 Compass Dr., Suite 102 Grand Junction, CO 81506 E-mail Address johnb@sgm-inc.com 8 0 Name Phone No. Alternate PhoneNo. SGM, Inc., Tony Haschke, EI, CEM, CBCP, CLEP (Mechanical) (970) 384-9070 (970) 379-6316 Mailing address City Zip 118 W. Sixth St. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 E-mail Address tonyh@sgm-inc.com PLEASE PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MAY HELP US CONTACT YOU FOR ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Tenant finish and improvement work is for FirstBank Holding Co., Inc., Adam Snyder, Asst. Vice Pres. 12345 W. Colfax Ave., Lakewood, CO 80215 (303) 235-1324 (office) (303) 919-1960 (cell) BASS CAHN - 6®19 LLC PO.BOX 4060 TEL:(970)920-0007 ASPEN,COLORADO 81512 FA\:(970)920-4976 f l;irrisluc..lm.part ncr_,_,qp May 16,2014 To: City of Aspen, Community Development Department From: Harris A. Cahn Re: Exterior improvements to 601 East Hopkins Ave. This email.confirms our designation of Michael Hassig, RA of A4 Architects, LLC as Owner's Representative for the purpose of pursuing Planning and Zoning Commission design review approvals for exterior renovations and improvements to the property we own at 601 East Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado. Bass Cahn — 01, LLC Harris A. Capri, Manage i i i s i I i I . A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 242 NORTH SEVENTH STREET CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 A4970.963.6760 www.a4arc. corn Olivia Emery RA Michael Hassig, R.A. LEED AP Brad Zeigel, AIA Project: FirstBank Aspen, Exterior Remodel Location: 601 East Hopkins Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 Owner: 601 East Hopkins Condominiums Legal Description: Lots A& B, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen Section 7,T. 10 S., R. 84 W. of the 6th P.M. City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado Date: 8 April 2014 Zone District: C-1 Character Area: CA Application: Commercial Design Review Existing Conditions FirstBank currently leases the first floor(garden level) space in the three-story building located at 601 East Hopkins Avenue.The bank floor level is approximately two feet below sidewalk level and is accessed from South Hunter Street by means of an exterior stair or ADA compliant ramp. Access from East Hopkins Avenue requires climbing a short flight of stairs to the building lobby and then using interior stairs to descend to the bank. Upper floor tenants include a law office, a real estate broker and a title company. The building, purportedly built in the 1960's as a lodge, is constructed of exterior masonry bearing walls and wood joist floors and roof. Original exterior finishes were stucco, buff-colored brick, wood trim and a batten on plywood vertical roof mansard. At some time in 1993 a 7-foot high decorative weathered-copper wainscot was added to portions of the north, west and south building elevations.This wainscot encroaches onto the sidewalk right of way approximately 5 inches and was granted an encroachment license by the City in January of 1993. Proposed Work 1. Removal of the copper wainscot and its backup framing and sheathing. 2. Painting of building exterior. 3. Installation of"Parklex Facade" high-density timber-faced siding panels mounted on prefinished extruded aluminum vertical furring fastened to existing building wall. (See building elevations.) Existing bank signage and lighting to remain unchanged. 4. Replacement of existing damaged concrete stairs to garden level. 5. Replacement of existing log guardrail between sidewalk and garden level. 6. Replacement of repair of existing 5-foot wood fence between garden level and alley parking areas with a 3'-6" high fence (except at trash and meter enclosures). 7. Installation of two new picnic tables for public use in the garden area. 0 601 East Hopkins Ave. Commercial Design Standards The first floor garden-level arrangement of this three-story building immediately establishes an unfortunate architectural relationship to the street. No street-level entry is possible and the three sidewalk shop-front windows look down into the garden level tenant space.The existing west elevation,facing South Hunter Street, was originally an unarticulated brick facade, punctuated only by two horizontal shop windows. These windows begin just above sidewalk level and end at about 5 feet up.Their location and orientation only serve to accentuate the unfortunate and ungainly proportions of this elevation. The weathered-copper wainscot, installed in 1993, was intended to highlight a retail shop on the garden level first floor.This seven-foot high wainscot creates the perception of a very short first floor, something quite different from the floor stature recommendation made in the City's design objectives for the Commercial Character Area, which call for storefronts of 13 to 15 feet in height. (1.32) The proposed new wood veneer panel siding is approximately 14 feet in height above sidewalk level. The top of the panel siding aligns with the cornice of the main building entrance off East Hopkins Avenue and with the top of the second floor sliding glass balcony doors.This new cladding visually establishes a tall "first floor" and becomes a "base" for the building. The manufacturer's literature for Parklex Facade describes it as "...a high-density stratified timber panel manufactured from kraft paper treated with resins thermoset under high pressure and temperature,finished with natural timber veneers highly resistant to UV radiation and atmospheric agents."The panels are finished with a PVDF anti-graffiti overlay for further surface protection. A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 242 NORTH SEVENTH STREET I CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 I www.a4arc. com �. —I 200m' .�- 1As .L.y TS`F� F* i�' -...�.� d�ryy t 1�"�.^. - �. � r e t- �, t' .. i V• , iz, 'J' •' LIP -€ t h..SrraXTf }�et _4a.1 - { .,.+ 'a ,.- '^w..°'`d.•i. 3 4 —`_-�, - t � _ r _ f1 itt w t� t ` 1 .l 4 4/.1' � - .. 5tw.`- �,...,���-.. .,,,t.,,tt f ..t r,�•�t-'°"'.: A ,+,}� -•— , -_ � � • 82 711 �p v est _ M y sq . � ::�; /� 0 Mapt�u ame<iladtaa �,1 TarnTaen ...._ �rM �...a.._. _...--.._........`........._..«.... _ ..�-.«..�....... .._..-.,...w ......,...�..,...,. .:�..IS.�Ez�..-....._�......o.>_.e..,...:..._..#..__.._...�:�t,�r.. �..�..A�_..s,..-_....._:._.....-.....-.............._...,,.�......ti t.,<i...it VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE: 601 EAST HOPKINS AVE. s • SUPPLEMENTARY W FORMATION AND COMMENTS 601 E. Hopkins. Aspen 1. Documentation related to the Encroachment Agreement is attached, including the Certificate of Insurance. Agreement recorded at Reception No. 353677. 2. Proforma Title Report Included in application. There is one lienholder on the property ((First Colorado National Bank). List of Schedule B-2 Exceptions included. 3. The current Owner of the Property — Bass Cahn — 601, LLC. , controls the HOA. 374468 P-762 P-9 09/23/94 10:25A PG 1 OF 1 REC DOC NO SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK R• RECORDER 5. 00 21 .00 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED GARY G. TROYER and LESLIE J. TROYER, whose address is 601 E. Hopkins, Aspen,CO 81611,as part of an Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 exchange, hereby transfer and convey to BASS CAHN PROPERTIES, a Colorado general partnership, whose address is 701 Gibson Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611,as to an undivided 2/3rds interest as tenant-in-common and HORSEFINS,LLC,a Colorado limited liability company,whose address is 601 E.Hopkins Ave.,Aspen,CO 81611,as to an undivided 1/3 interest as tenant-in-common,the following real property in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado: LOTS A AND B, BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, also known by street and number as: 601 E. Hopkins, Aspen, CO 81611, with all its appurtenances, and warrant the title to the same, subject to and except for: 4 1. General taxes for 1994 and thereafter payable in 1995 and thereafter; 2. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Multipurpose Easement CJ Agreement, Electric and Communications Utilities, recorded in Book 379 at Page 954. 3. Terms and conditions of Encroachment Agreement recorded in Book 702 at Page 821. ALL REFERENCES BEING TO THE REAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Signed thisday of September 1994. p `_`) Gary G. T yer aV" 'TATE J. oyer� OF COLORADO ) _ ) ss. orn �� COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this8 day of September 1994, M by Gary G. Troyer and Leslie J. Troyer. q•�._ A M Wi hand and official seal. c� n expires: a a �; Apra•-...r�� c SE \c QtCf(Q_� `�LC✓It�'7!,( SP JWCAGNMNotary Public 61 .11 My Camnisslon D#ms 1111)5X f - r PROFORMA TITLE REPORT SCHEDULEA 1. Effective Date: April 18, 2014 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT24040P 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Insured: PROFORMA 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: BASS CAHN-601, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: UNITS 1, 2A AND 2B, 601 EAST HOPKINS CONDOMINIUMS,A COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY, according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded December 20, 1994 in Plat Book 35 at Page 76 and Condominium Declaration for 601 East Hopkins Condominiums recorded December 20, 1994 in Book 769 at Page 931. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE,INC. 601 E.HOPKINS,ASPEN,CO.81611 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax 877-217-3158 Toll Free AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: SCHEDULE B-SECTION I REQUIREMENTS THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Multipurpose Easement Agreement, Electric and Communications Utilities, recorded November 29, 1979 in Book 379 at Page 954. 8. Terms and conditions of Encroachment Agreement dated February 5, 1993 in Book 702 at Page 821. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions and assessments as set forth in the Condominium Declaration for 601 East Hopkins Condominiums recorded December 20, 1994 in Book 769 at Page 931. 10. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded December 20, 1994 in Plat Book 35 at Page 76. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Subordination,Attornment and Non-Distrubance Agreement recorded May 22, 2013 as Reception No. 599720 12. Deed of Trust from : BASS CAHN 601, LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY To the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN For the use of : FIRST COLORADO NATIONAL BANK Original Amount : $600,000.00 Dated : July 23, 2007 Recorded : July 26, 2007 Reception No. : 540341 T S .S✓!"i.Z•r s`� ,�,D + l_ `-y,��til�l y�e,/� 1 '4�y� y I ��h 5i .+�'ca- iv,,�.' 11 �' ,\s •C�7•.; ,.:r1.',5 .jj.�f¢ � Jl fr s1 v - �:�i�•.? .sYv �1i.�, C �,. i,tt - •• t3i�,,s;•.i a' ". •'SJ t#3S3€x7.7'02/05783 t L-44 Rec`�t20.00-Bt:' 702 pGi•8$1 _,_Silvia Davis, Pitkin-Cnty Clerk;_'Doc'�.Ov ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT This agreement made and entered into this 29714 •y �r/ y 's _da of J — ,�_ I993,by and between the CITY OF ASPEN, Pitkin County, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "Aspen"and GARY G.TROYER AND LESLIE J.TROyER,602 East Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 31611, hereinafter referred to as"Licensee," WHEREAS,Licensee is d:,,owner of the following described properly Joe in t City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado: ated he 601 East Hopkins Avenue ` Lots A& B,Block 99 a of Aspen,s en, Pitkin Count • :;�,+ •. P Y.Colorado; WHEREAS,said property abuts the following described pu"blit right(, )•of--way: .', Hunter Street and Hopkins Avenue; -WHEREAS,licensee desires to encroach upon said right(s)•of way: � Approximately 3" for a length of:.ppr ximalely 33,8' as shown on Exhibit "A" "')F copper siding and electric wiring and lighting; ;'. WHEREAS, Section 19-5 delegates the authority to the City Engineer to grant . encroachment licenses; WHRREAS,Aspcn agrees to the grant of a private license of encroachment as built s. subject to certain conditions. THEREFORE,in consideration e f the mulual agreement hereinafter contained,Aspen and Licensee covenart and agree as follows: t. A private revocable license is hereby granted to Licensee to occupy,maintain and utilize the above described portion of pvhlic right-of-way for the sole purpose described, C 2. This license is granted for a perpetual term subject to being terminated al any time _ ?€ land for any reason at the sole discretion of the Cir' Engineer of the City of Aspen, 3. This license shalt be subordinate to the right of Aspen to use said area for an public purposes, y �..,' jY 4. Licensee is responsible for the maintenance and repair of the public right-of-tvay, pa• together with improvements constructed therein, which Aspen, in the exercise of its discretion,shall determine to be necessary to keep the same in a safe and clean condition. t die, - { r`'' EM: 14�1 #353677 02/05/93 11;44 Rec' <0.04 6K +� 702 pG 622 Silvia Davis, PiLkir, Coty Clerk, Dac 3,00 ' x + r. The Licensee shall obtain permits front the City Streets Department for any work to be performed in the public right-of-way a r y with design b approvals For such work obtained from +� ' s the City Parks and Engineering Departments as appropriate. 5. Licensee shall at ail times during the term hereof, ctrl• c7' f � t�t:blic liability insurance for the benefll of the City with limits of not less than those t:.;t'i::;••. 4-10-114, C.M.,(cutrently$150,000 per person and$600,000 per occu;:::.�e)b s mayctbe ctin zamended from time to time, na!niog the City as co-insured. licensee shall maintain said coverage r>; in full force and effect during the term of this License and shall furnish the City with a Copy of such coverage or a certificate evidencing such coverage. All insurance alleles {tI In, pursuant to this agreement shall contain the following endorsement: P ., i "It is herebv tmderstood and agreed that INS insurance policy may not be cancelled t by the surety anlil thirty(30)days after receipt by the City, by registered mail,of a written notice of such intention to cancel or not to renew.' `'` t,.. The licensee shall show proof of this insurance to the City before this agreement is filed. r, 6. Licensee shall save, defend and hold harmless against any and all claims for FFI dnmages, costs and expenses, to persons or property that may arise ovt of, or be occasioned by the use,occupancy and maintenance of said property by Licensee,or from ;• any act or omission of any representative, agent,customer and/or employee of Licensee. 7. This license may be terminated by Licensee at any time and for any reason on thirty (30) days written notice of Licensee's intent to cancel. This license may be terminated by Aspen at any time and for any reason. Upon termination Licensee shall, at Licensee's expense, remove any improvements or encroachments from said property. The property shall be restored to - a condition satisfactory to Aspen. 8. This license is subject to at!state laws, the provisions of the Charter of the City of < Aspen as it now exists or may hereafter be amended,and the ordinances of the City of Aspen now in effect or those which may hereafter be adopted. 9. Nothing herein Shall be construed ed ._ so as to prevent Aspen from gratilin additional licenses or property interests in or affecting said property as it deems necess airy. 10. The conditions hereof imposed on the granted license of encroachment shall constitute covenants running with the land, and binding upon Licensee, their heirs, { + successors and assigns. In tiny legal action to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing r}:I party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys fees. 12. if the structure for which this license was issued is removed for any reason, Licensee may not rebuild !n the Same location,without obtaining another encroachment r G. 'e4 1 } i ''. Y .. .• r�' 'x`11 v` '^'4 .i ^w....eeu -`k �..tfi� ,.i, �'�S�iYf,Y + i >� 6s�Yry.� r 1'^rf. 4353677 02/05/93 11:44 Roc 820:•00 btt 702 !1(3623 i,. ,.Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Cler-k;'.Doc 5.00• , y,•.'r i� license prior is building. No existing encroachment shall be enlarged without obtaining f,'+. .tut additir,aal license prior to construction. 13. The licensee waives any and all claims against the City of Aspen for loss or +' ' C damage to the improvements constructed within the encroachment area. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties executed this agreement at Aspen the day and {<. year first written. CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO 7 �/) S< BYi11!/ . City Engineer :1 TEST.fi::;`' 1 KOCH, City Cierk Lice ee ;ty -STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin,) "i The foregoing instrument was acknowled ed before me this lSC day of 19DA by 5 �Ly�_2.2 _'Licensee. -• WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL, "�,IY commission expires; =$ .. -,,�`,:��• �o rcntw t l0�int } Notary Public Address j! . f Vel 801 E.HAV*. AVw.W etali .,:- my CfX ®rgx¢®Sit f.1� ."�E� ett ase < ., x��'ts����;Y� d f1;-��i"•.L�+1,..rJ,-:,�_-'.,,Nq",.a_.......w0b,�..<:J�sdi ive 4+.oF.ava-�e 1� � '<� i.� - fyi i { i \@h�i.. T„ ', �'• CLING s� � \ Q�,. gii ' FXNYBIT "A" 6-24'a CUCR 0.0 23.7 O 1 0 2 STORY 3 C'I� ` GARDEN LEVEL BSM I � 0 m in 601 East Hopkins Avenue d 43 .. 1 ? . 25.35 d,; Ory �•._' 70 @" 1 55. + f O 1.3 23. ? 13 T NO LkVfJ- WOOD PLANTER .& FOUND NT5'Q9'J1"W i RIM NO CAP i;< :> sEWE , i _. Uui EXHIBIT ° a °. a 4 ° a. a d 4 °' 4 Q d d 4 4 � `l� •C d d d 4 V ° �] ° d. . . a 0st' [1 COS ° v. a�pA�r a 4 'poy 9 d d ° . a a ° to Pork" ° v ° d d 4 d a � d ° S 14050'49" W d 100.00' d a 4 a . d Lot A 601 East Hopkins Condominiums 4 v ° d 1 lot B d � 3.7 d v d a 4 ° d. .3' 4 v 4 . st 4 . a 4 ° X0001 R SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: N I, David A_Cooper, being a Registered Land Surveyor, licensed in the State yof Colorado, do hereby certify that this exhibit map showing the westerly wall detail at 601 East Hopkins Condominiums was prepared on November m 27, 2013, from a survey performed on November 25, 2013, under my supervision and checking, and that both the survey and map are true a 11 accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. A David A. Cooper o�� .• s Colo. Reg. P.L.S. # 29030 Qm For, and on �_, Scale: 1" = 6' behalf of SGM �, � LANA Job No. 2013382.001 SGM 601 E Hopkins Condos Drawn by: dac Exhibit Map sht. 1 p 118 West Sixth Street,Suite 200 Lots A & B, Block 99 Date: 11/27/13 Glenwood Springs,CO 81601 Approved: West Wa I I Detail 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com City of Aspen File: RnB-18131120 Of 1 (� OP ID: KO CER"T��A TE OF ��AB�n �Tj Y ��SU NC DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) �C U (L IJ �J 05/16/14 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). CONTACT PRODUCER 970-945-9111NAME: Neil-GaPO Box1576 Agency,Inc. 970-945-2350 a/c NN E :t: FAA/c,No): Glenwood Springs,CO 81602 E-MAADDRIESS: John Wilkinson PRODUCER CUSTOMER ID#:601 EA-1 INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED 601 East Hopkins Condominium A INSURER A:Fireman's Fund Insurance Co 29181 PO Box 4060 INSURER 8: Aspen,CO 81612 INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 1 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS LTR WV POLICY NUMBER MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,000 AMAGE TO A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X AZC80877070 09/22/13 09/22/14 PREMISES Ea ccu RENTED nce $ 100,000 CLAIMS-MADE FxI OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 2,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 4,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 4,000,000 X1 POLICY PRO LOC $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 2,000,000 A ANY AUTO AZC80877070 09/22/13 09/22/14 (Ea accident)BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ SCHEDULED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE $ X HIRED AUTOS (Per accident) X NON-OWNEDAUTOS $ $ X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 A AZC80877070 09/22/13 09/22/14 DEDUCTIBLE $ X RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION WC STATU- OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY y/N TORY LIMITS ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? N/A (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ If as describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below 'r I E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT 1$ A Property Section ZC80877070 09/22/13 09/22/14 Buildings 4,472,000 Deduct 2,500 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,if more space is required) Holder is included as Additional Insured under General Liability only and only in respects to the Encroachment License. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION CITYAS1 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Aspen THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 130 S.Galena ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Aspen,CO 81611 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2009109) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 601 East Hopkins Condominium Association P.O. Box 4060 Aspen, CO 81612 f May 22, 2014 To: City of Aspen, Community Development Department From: The 601 East Hopkins Condominium Association Re: Exterior improvements to 601 East Hopkins Ave. p , I This email confirms that the 601 East Hopkins Condominium Association approves the designation by Bass Cahn — 601, LLC, owner of Unit 1 of the 601 East Hopkins Condominium Association, of Michael Hassig, RA of A4 Architects, LLC as Owner's Representative for the purpose of pursuing Planning and Zoning Commission design review approvals for exterior renovations and improvements to the property owned by Bass Cahn — 601, LLC at 601 East Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado. I I The 601 East Hopkins Condominium Association i By: Harris A. Cahn, Declarant and authorized Member of Executive Board of the 1601 East Hopkins Condominium Association. I i i I s f i i { OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO I CER'T'IFICATE f I,Scott Gessler,as the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado,hereby certify that,according to the records of this office, THE 601 EAST HOPKINS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION is a Corporation formed or registered on 09/12/1994 under the law of Colorado,has complied with all applicable requirements of this office,and is in good standing with this office. This entity has been assigned entity identification number 19941102262. This certificate reflects facts established or disclosed by documents delivered to this office on paper through 05/21/2014 that have been posted,and by documents delivered to this office electronically through 05/22/2014 @ 11:34:00. I have affixed hereto the Great Seal of the State of Colorado and duly generated,executed,authenticated, issued,delivered and communicated this official certificate at Denver,Colorado on 05/22/2014 @ 11:34:00 pursuant to and in accordance with applicable law. This certificate is assigned Confirmation Number 8856854. i i I� I I •I � i Secretary of State of the State of Colorado ********End of Certificate*+ I Notice:A certificate issued electronically rom the Colorado Secretary of State's Web site is kdli'•and immediatety valid and effective. However, as an option;the issuance and validity of a certificate obtained electronically»rqv be established by visiting the Certificate Confirmation Page of the Secretary of Sfates Web site, !!rte !1i-wntsor.statecn.0/bi_%Cirri icor tiearch(:'riteria.dn uttering the certificate's cafrnration number displayed ari die certificate, and following the instructions displm•ed. Confirming die issuance o o rertifiente is mereli,ontional acrd is not n rrecessa ,to the valid and effective issuance of a certificate For more it Jornmtion,visit mor Web site, lntp: mn•, .anssmtcaco as!c/ick Business Center and select"Frequently Asked Questions." i� CERT GS_D Revised 08/20.'2008 i 1 1+i I t w � I Search, For this Record... Filing history and { Geta a rte GeSummary o,�°a ire a ry , Get a certificate of good i standing Filea form Subscribe to email notification Unsubscribe from email notification Details i Name THE 601 EAST HOPKINS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION Business Home Business Information Status Good Standing Formation date 09/12/1994 Business Search ID number 19941102262 I Form Corporation Jurisdiction Colorado FAQs,Glossary and Periodic report month April Information Term of duration Perpetual Principal office street address 346 DRAW DRIVE,ASPEN,CO 81612,United States Principal office mailing address n/a i I Registered Agent Name HARRIS A.CAHN Street address 346 DRAW DRIVE,P.O.BOX 4060,ASPEN,CO 81612,United States Mailing address n/a i i l Filing history and documents i Get a certificate of good standing ' f File a form i Set un secure business filing i Subscribe to email notification , Unsubscribe from email notification i Back_.__._ .1 t i i i i { i i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE KESS OF PROPERTY:f f K " 00 �r{I1 �t/� , Aspen, CO REDUCED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 20_Lj STATE OF COLORADO ) } ss. County of Pitkin ) I LI�`a ( � d tT n (naLne, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of 7a.otice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was.not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the _ day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached.hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304..060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to. the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the - .property subject-to,, the development application. The names and addresses of v ry� it J� i �if'iFf9 ..i. �) f:property,vovrners slihll be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no�morezthan sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. _A 1111 , 7t1 ax,r iy��1 n ,, ow�ie�stand go»ernmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach.: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, suminarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy .of the neighborhood outreach sumrrza7y, including the 772ethod of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued 071 next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and. new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any • way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map. or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection<in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. i I 4iignature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this)9 day of � �\ & , 20�z� by � �1 cpm �� ,- I�,� �v i n PUBLIC NOTICERE'601 ' CONSOUDATEDCOMMERCIAL ESHOPKINS NGN'REVIEW WITNESS My HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY.GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday;August 5th at a meeting to Z`, begin at.4:30 p.m:before the Aspen Planning and My C01T11T11sslon eXpires: \Q S Zoning Commission,Sister Cities Room, it all, 130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to consider an appplica-' tion submitted by Bass Cahn 601,LLC,.for thec property located at 601 East Hopkins Avenue,rep-, �� �� resented by Michael Hassig,RA;of A4 Architects,, Notary Public LLC.The applicant is requesting approval of mi ary nor exterior changes to the siding,garden-level amenities,and windows;which are subject to Commercial Design Standards. The property is legally described as the north half BONNIE L. SHILES of Lots A,and B,Block 99,601 East Hopkins Ave NOTARY PUBLIC nue Units 1,2-A,and 2-13,City and Townsite of,As-• STATE OF COLORADO pen,Parcel ID#27377073-80-001 thru-003. For fur NTS AS APPLICABLE: NOTARY ID 20054038739 ther information,contact Jonathan Hayden at the W COMMISSION EXPIRES OCTOBER 30,2017 City of Aspen Community Development Depart0 - ment;130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970)429.2755, oN jonathan.hayden@cityofaspemcom sN paner OSTED NOTICE (SIGN) Aspen Planning and zoning COmmission GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED Published in the Aspen Times on July 18,2014 (10387033) �n TION OF MINERAL ESTAE 0 WNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. x'24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE t REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: (go( (� , (-iW I L I)Q ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 1LV6 ctc s 20i STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, n���L C 1-i�nt (name,please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of'Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than.one inch in height. SW notice was posted at least fifteebl5) days prior to the public hearing on the [1 day of 1 A: , 20 ( , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the w4wers and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that u,as presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested,to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas,are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended,whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this day of ,201f,by f AOQ 6a -t WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICI ATSEAL ERIC J.GROSS My commission expires; 9 `� O NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO MY:CONiMISSION EXPIRES 9/14/20U c)Q Notary Public 1(:T ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: o COPY OF THEPUBLICA TION ® PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) o LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. X24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 601 E.HOPKINS—CONSOLIDATED COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, August 5, 2014, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen to consider an application submitted by Bass Cahn 601, LLC(601 E. Hopkins Ave.,Aspen, CO, 81611),represented by Michael Hassig,RA,related to their property located at 601 E. Hopkins,Lots A &B, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen,Parcel ID#2737-073-80-001. The applicant proposes to replace siding,remove copper cladding, and repair garden level amenities. The applicant requests Commercial Design Review approval. This will be a one-step hearing with only Commercial Design review of mass'and scale required. For further information, contact Jonathan Hayden at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO,(970)429-2755,Jonathan.hayden@cityofaspen.com. 117 SOUTH SPRING STREET HOLDINGS 204 SOUTH GALENA STREET LLC 308 HUNTER LLC LLC 2001 N HALSTED#304 490 WILLIAMS ST PO BOX 11600 CHICAGO, IL 60614 DENVER, CO 80218 ASPEN, CO 81612 514 AH LLC 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC 530 HOPKINS LLC 514 E HYMAN AVE 517 E HOPKINS AVE 5301/2 E HOPKINS ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 610 EAST HYMAN LLC 625 MAIN ASPEN LLC 625 MAIN INVESTMENTS LLC C/O CHARLES CUNNIFFE 465 N MILL ST STE 12-113 1482 E VALLEY RD#463 610 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 ASPEN, CO 81611 630 EAST HYMAN LLC 633 SPRING 11 LLC 633 SPRING PENTHOUSE LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE#207 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 633 SPRING SECOND FLOOR LLC 635 E HOPKINS LLC ALPINE BANK ASPEN 601 E HYMAN AVE 532 E HOPKINS ATTN ERIN WIENCEK ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 10000 GLENWOOD SPRINGS,CO 81602 ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ASPEN ART MUSEUM ASPEN BLOCK 99 LLC SAINT MARYS 590 N MILL ST 532 E HOPKINS AVE 1300 S STEELE ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80210 ASPEN CORE PENTHOUSE LLC ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC ASPEN PLAZA LLC 0133 PROSPECTOR RD#4102B 418 E COOPER AVE#207 PO BOX 1709 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC AVP PROPERTIES LLC BAUM ROBERT E 532 E HOPKINS AVE 630 E HYMAN AVE#25 PO BOX 1518 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 STOCKBRIDGE, MA 01262 BERN FAMILY ASPEN PROPERTY LLC BIG HOPKINS LLC BPOE ASPEN LODGE#224 PO BOX 8020 421 N BEVERLY DR#300 210 S GALENA ST#21 GARDEN CITY, NY 11530 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ASPEN, CO 81611 CAREM LLC CICUREL CARY CITY OF ASPEN 655 MADISON AVE 11TH FL 2615 N LAKEWOOD 130 S GALENA ST NEW YORK, NY 10065 CHICAGO, IL 60614 ASPEN, CO 81611 COX JAMES E LIVING TRUST CWAREI LLC DRESNER MILTON H REV LVG TRST 3284 SURMONT DR 3030 HARTLEY RD#350 28777 NORTHWESTERN HWY LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32257 SOUTHFIELD, MI 48034 DUNN JUDITH A REV LIV TRUST EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC ELKS LODGE 224 8051 LOCKLIN LN 1601 ELM ST#4000 210 S GALENA ST STE 21 COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI 48382 DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 EMCAR LLC EXELCEDAR INC 20% FURNGULF LLP ATTN BARRY L BLOOM 534 E HYMAN AVE 616 E HYMAN AVE 655 MADISON AVE 11TH FL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10065 GELD LLC GLAUSER STEVEN JERRY&BARBARA GROSFELD ASPEN PROP PART LLC PO BOX 1247 460 ST PAUL ST 10880 WILSHIRE BLVD#2222 ASPEN, CO 81612-1247 DENVER, CO 80206 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 HIMAN LLC HOPKINS DEV LLC HORSEFINS LLC PO BOX 6159 345 PARK AVE 33RD FLR 601 E HOPKINS AVE SWANBOURNE WA 6010 NEW YORK, NY 10154 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTRALIA, HOVERSTEN PHILIP E&LOUISE B HUGHES GREGORY HUNTER SQUARE LLC 90% 2990 BOOTH CREEK DR 208 S SPRING ST#1 PO BOX 2 VAIL;CO 81657 ASPEN, CO 81611 SONOMA, CA 95476 HURST FERN K INDY HOUSE LLC JARDEN CORPORATION 1060 5TH AVE 12555 BISCAYNE BLVD#711 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR NEW YORK CITY, NY 10128 MIAMI, FL 33181 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 JOSHUA&CO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS JURINE LLC 10% LUCKYSTAR LLC LLC PO BOX 2 PO BOX 7755 300 S HUNTER ST SONOMA, CA 95476 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 MALLARD ENTERPRISES LP MARSH HUGH MARTELL BARBARA 317 SIDNEY BAKER S#400 631 E MAIN ST 702 E HYMAN AVE KERRVILLE,TX 78028 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MYSKO ASPEN HOLDINGS NONNIE LLC PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS ASSOC 615 E HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 565 517 W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% QTIP MARITAL TRUST 1/2 ROTHBLUM PHILIP 1/2 534 E HYMAN AVE 40 E 80TH ST#PH 26A 40 E 80TH ST#PH 26A ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10075 NEW YORK, NY 10075 ROY ADAM C&SARAH G RUDIN MICHAEL&SABRINA RUST TRUST 625 E MAIN ST#203 345 PARK AVE 233 S BEVERLY DR#B ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10154 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 902123896 SALET PHILIP S REV TRUST SJA ASSOCIATES LLC SLS LLC PO BOX 4897 418 E COOPER AVE#207 101 FOUNDERS PL#104 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 STEWART TITLE CO THOMAS KATHRYN THOMPSON ROSS&LYNETTE PO BOX 669 631 E MAIN ST PO BOX 367 HOUSTON,TX 77001 ASPEN, CO 81611 CARBONDALE, CO 816230367 TRACY KATHLEEN VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC WOODS FRANK J III 625 E MAIN ST#202 418 E COOPER AVE#207 51027 HWY 6&24 STE 100 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N 13 BRAMLEY RD LONDON W10 6SP UK, a E' t � kyy iL Z am MhWE lots, Iwo tr t Ah", OWNS ggJQ Q €' IN 17 Z „ o Eva AS 1 sftP&�� lot Ii Fffi6 (} 'C H✓ ±/sfr �Gti �'A'q F' e'' �jtR �m' NSW %3 3 �Sv ��:. ��k� ➢ �Z'R9s� 3x'ax- V , 9 4' c r• fi' THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: May 28, 2014 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0047.2014. ASLU —601 E. Hopkins, Commercial Design Review. Jonathan Hayden will be the planner for the land use case. ❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Y� ur Land Use Application is complete: fothere are not missing items listed above, then your application has-been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank ou, J fifer P lan Deputy Planning Director- City of Asp n, Community Development Department . For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New SPA New PUD Yes No Subdivision, SPA, or PUD(creating more than I additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Q Commercial E.P.F. Lodging IM � t Surve j�m en t Pla t 60.1 a Hopkins Condomin* us Lots A B, ck 99 City! d Townsite ofAspen so t.i o. �, . 10 -So R., 84 'W." of the 6th P.M. City of Aspen'PS l , • :.-.. .z t off' x'.11, Pit "�•y'o t Colo.�a do `" sire 13.1.x' l'. Intersection of Goleno & Hopkins " ', et con f P .> rp • 1 ""'••s a �• • , • • `' A ' 4 ' ,h• • , t • , ' • • = , ' '•,, ' •' ' •• , ' Ms � , "OV II�.%i���$ . , . ° , . . . . .., �� Storm �.fanhoJe •, , • ' , . • , . ! , .. . - /j(/ ' •"♦at.tiF� y . \ • •' , • •`' • . j•• ; • • ' • • , • r • � • , •� • • •,♦/Ly[i," , �1q .n•••• • • ',,, j• , • • , ' , • , (_`'+'•'.P/1 ,"I • ,y K 4p, jib] . y ($ 4f Ash' (City r t / 75' Right-of-WayW I City of Aspen GPS -°2 intersection of Galena & Ouront Notice: According to Colorado Low, you must commence ony Iegol octlbn based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discover y such defect. In no event may any 109111 action based upon any defect in this survey be �,. commenced more than. ten years from the date b of the cerNicotion shown hereon, '� .. Y ' ' » , Vv/J�" ,..r.'-; —r -`r �., Ont •ate .. • ' '.' . '. . ' � . . JJ// • . S ; .. • J. . ,. , Set NailPark" Oroin Inlet; 4 Rim=7919,25' " • ' d .� , ,° :� . `", , "`""��+., ; q• IO=7'916 75' ' •,� � •" � • ' ,,.; � ,q Y q' ,,,,• '•�`"`�,�.�°"i;�-iqp f . ., t ; .. y o , e � 9 • ' % ' S �, A• ' ti•q � R •�' � q r t,y S (:'��®�,�! � •" 5 „ "Pay A ° 4 , v °'�, n SO •, ,. d �' `\ '+•"" e, ♦ e age e i d' P1a k Cap 'LS 14111 ' , .r :tr Q i' s� t" q' 4• •i' 3.4' ` �/. `;� \' \� ,'{n Jti�GJ ' t�tJan�7920ei7 " \ • i e "r �, •• +�• "a / ,{� . 'a �� 792,,3„1'' t•$ 'i `;' b 41 /91 TWO Stor1 Building f' i • " r , ,1'. ' � d'� ; ' /, GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I 'inoh - 10 at:.; t • ^ r�.r , ar en � e. a ase,men ;- ,. � Found Monument as Described Found Monument as Described 1 v t Lvf % -a '' Found Monument as Described 0 .Found Monument as Described Electric Transformer Got 8 r Electric Meter Electric Panel 7i 0 - Electric Manhole - LJght 'Pole a• r q A �o p �`� / ���j���{ Ill Telephone Ped * • p/ , t Water Shut-off "t • Y Asn ``...� d ». a r r _ ! I Rebor & Plastic Cop LS 16'129 b`Jevotlon=7'921,87' set Rebar & LS j 2903'0 1922 ' •` • • • '•' Mu/tipurpase• Easeme�#,'� b� "'�"'. U 66k.• 3J'9; Pope `954 ' ,• ♦,. H u ,. .., ' • ,• `��',9 ff �@aria S .` :.�`•=� ' iso. 21 xot .Y "``- :.•� j' �o'--., , , Right •fit ,e Nall Wosher 15',W47 f t"l�vatlanffi7923.03' J tat A' 601 East Flo Lots A 118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Cityand970.945A 00,4 www.sgm-inc.com er -� Witer .Spigot �- Sonitary Sewer Manhole - Cleanout (t — GO$ Meter l '• 0 r Storm Manhole i ,Sign, - Single Pole 1 Tree •� Deciduous f t i 1 Tree - Evergreen s f -----E-'---�- Underground Electric Line 1 G Gas Line s ----X-�-- Fenceline I '- ----- Ad,;roiner Property trine Street Centerline Hondrall E a I -. Concrete V - Brick Cop / I �i,.'Y. �" -- Asphalt 90':. & Plastic � Cap -- f Way is 19596 100Y erg -� of. city s 'kins Condominiums # Revision B, Block 99 2 3 'Ownsite of As�je 4 1'"' 5 Pr•Qp�, Oessc; 601 East Hopkins Condominiums according to the Condominium Mop thereof, recorded in Plat Book 35 of Page 76, +G�#y of Aspen, State. of Colorado. Nates. 1. This map has been created pursuant to the clients request for an Improvement Survey Plat of the property shown hereon. 2. •The mathematical error of dosum for the boundary of -this property is less than 1115,000 J. Famel sire. 6WO Sr / 0. IX acres, . 4. SGM will not be responsible for ony changes made to this document after It leaves our possession. Anycopy f;1W11e, .etc„ of this document• most be compared to the anginal signed, sealed, and dated document to insure the accuracy of the information shown on any such copy, and to insure that no such changes have been mode. ✓. Any subsurface utilitlats not shown ,hereon, were not marked by appropriate uNNY companies at the time of this survey.C/fent/contractor must contact sped ric t�#fl/jy comparifos to verify both the locatMn and depth of refpectivo utilities. Additional suave}}��i1g wank may bo required to show any such subsurface ublfty locations on this drawing. S6'M WN not be responsible for protectlon of subsurface Ul/7111es not marked an the ground at the time of this survey. 6.. Basis of Beatings: S75109'11 T between monuments shown hereon. 7. Vertical Datum: SAVO 88 per the Clty of Aspen GPS Control Monumentation 2009. 8. Contour Interval.- One foot. 9. Unils of linear measurement. IS Survey 10 renes shown horeon, If any, do not necessarily represent the limits of ownership. 11. The property shown hereon is subject to all easements, nghts-of ways, building setbacks or other restrictions of record, as such Items may affect this properly. )'his map was propared without beneffl of a current title commitment I and loos not represent a t/Y/e search by SGM of the property shown hereon to determine ownership, compailblIgy with adjoining parcels, or easements or encumbrances of record affect/ng this pmperf : 4 David A, Cooper, being a registered Professional ,Land Surveyor, licensed in the Stale of Colorado, do hereby. certify that this fS an frnprovement 'Survey Plot as defined by DRS 3-51-f02(9j, resulting from a monumentod fond survey, showing the current location of a// sr" rnificont visible structunrs, utilities, fences, fledges, or we//$ situated on the described parcel and w�Yhin. live feet .cf a1l baundary'es of such parcel, and also any visible conflicting boundary etfdence or ancroachments, and off easements and Is -Of -way of a. public or private na#ure that aro visible, or opparen� or of record, and underground Olives described In or other sources as specified the fift commrY'ment referenced hereon, and that this IMM Ovement Survey Plot was pJepared by SGM, on this date, May R1, 2013, based on site condlY/ons as they existed dun'ng a Heid survey performed May 8, 2013, under my direct supervision one checking and that it is true and • correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. David A. Cooper Colo. Res. P.E.S. # 29030 For, and'on behaff of SGM Date B - !ab No. 2013.382.001 rove m e n t S u ry ���'�: �� mn ' hate: 05/20/2013 Plat Approved: dac of File: ffrsftnk62 i Date B - !ab No. 2013.382.001 rove m e n t S u ry ���'�: �� mn ' hate: 05/20/2013 Plat Approved: dac of File: ffrsftnk62 94) Bl®ck ASP end (City Of UFA Cit of Aspen GPS -2 Intersection of Galena & Durant f 66_ Rebar & Plastic Cap LS 16129 Bevotian=7921.87' coarc Oiy, rage y� •��,,5p9�,•F f��oQn, �, ASO®. ue-� 20.go' Right -of -Way / lot L Nai! & Washer ` L f ASP LS 25947 / Q / Elevation -7923.03' city 4t d __ L 10 Lot L, 0 Rebar & Plastic Cap t LS 19598 l a ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = to ft. 40 -LEGEND- — Concrete — Brick — Asphalt KEYNOTES - NEW WORK 1� REMOVE EXISTING COPPER SIDING REPAIR SUBSTRATE AS NEEDED INSTALL HIGH-DENSITY STRATIFIED TIMBER PANEL ONALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS 01 REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING WOOD GUARDRAIL C4) REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING CONCRETE STAIR 5� INSTALL NEW HANDRAILS EACH SIDE 0 REMOVE EXISTING TIMBER & CONCRETE STEPS INSTALL NEW CONCRETE STEPS 7� PREPARE & REPAINT EXISTING GUARDRAILS a RE -ANCHOR GUARDRAIL POST BASES W/ TAPCON FASTENERS THRU BASEPLATE 90 REMOVE EXISTING EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE REVISE CONDUIT TO ELIMINATE (2) EXISTING FIXTURE J -BOXES (ao) REPLACE EXISTING EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE 11 REMOVE EXISTING RAIL FENCE 12 REPLACE BROKEN 4X4 FENCE POST 13 CUT DOWN EXISTING FENCE TO 6" ABOVE HORIZONTAL MID -RAIL, 14 REPLACE DAMAGED FENCE PICKETS - RE -STAIN FENCE 15 REMOVE EXISTING LOG POSTS - CUT OFf STEEL ANCHORS MIN. 4" BELOW GRADE 16 REPLACE EXISTING PLANTER CAPS W/ NEW PPE PLANKING 17 REPLACE DAMAGED BEVEL SIDING @ PLANTER RE -STAIN PLANTER SIDING 1 S REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING DIRECTORY A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 FAX 970.963.6761 maiL@a4arc.com E 601 East Hopkins Ave. Ground Floor Aspen, Colorado Date I Issued For f 5.20.14 1 CITY OF ASPEN DESIGN REVIEW I Project No: 1307.1 I Drawn By: METH Found Monument as Described U — Found Monument as Described a — Found Monument as Described O — Found Monument as Described U — Electric Transformer Q — Electric Meter E — Electric Panel ® — Electric Manhole * — Light Pole M — Telephone Ped — Water Shut—off c� — Water Spigot O—Sanitary Sewer Manhole ® — Cleanout ® — Gas Meter ® — Storm Manhole —a-- — Sign — Single Pole left — Tree — Deciduous — Tree — Evergreen —UE— Underground Electric Line c Gas Line X Fenceline --- Adjoiner Property Line — Street Centerline —fl Handrail — Concrete — Brick — Asphalt KEYNOTES - NEW WORK 1� REMOVE EXISTING COPPER SIDING REPAIR SUBSTRATE AS NEEDED INSTALL HIGH-DENSITY STRATIFIED TIMBER PANEL ONALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS 01 REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING WOOD GUARDRAIL C4) REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING CONCRETE STAIR 5� INSTALL NEW HANDRAILS EACH SIDE 0 REMOVE EXISTING TIMBER & CONCRETE STEPS INSTALL NEW CONCRETE STEPS 7� PREPARE & REPAINT EXISTING GUARDRAILS a RE -ANCHOR GUARDRAIL POST BASES W/ TAPCON FASTENERS THRU BASEPLATE 90 REMOVE EXISTING EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE REVISE CONDUIT TO ELIMINATE (2) EXISTING FIXTURE J -BOXES (ao) REPLACE EXISTING EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE 11 REMOVE EXISTING RAIL FENCE 12 REPLACE BROKEN 4X4 FENCE POST 13 CUT DOWN EXISTING FENCE TO 6" ABOVE HORIZONTAL MID -RAIL, 14 REPLACE DAMAGED FENCE PICKETS - RE -STAIN FENCE 15 REMOVE EXISTING LOG POSTS - CUT OFf STEEL ANCHORS MIN. 4" BELOW GRADE 16 REPLACE EXISTING PLANTER CAPS W/ NEW PPE PLANKING 17 REPLACE DAMAGED BEVEL SIDING @ PLANTER RE -STAIN PLANTER SIDING 1 S REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING DIRECTORY A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 100 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 201 CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 FAX 970.963.6761 maiL@a4arc.com E 601 East Hopkins Ave. Ground Floor Aspen, Colorado Date I Issued For f 5.20.14 1 CITY OF ASPEN DESIGN REVIEW I Project No: 1307.1 I Drawn By: METH cV1L"r1Aif1- DA1A17G'r) ON ALUMINUM FURRING TU 15k HEMU Vi:u RT NOH ELEVATION 1 1/4"= pr.Qx AT GARDEN LEVEL SOUTH ELEVATION 1/411= 1x011 ON ALUMINUM FURRING KISTING ROJECTl1 'GN A4 ARCHITECTS LLC 242 NORTH SEVENTH STREET CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 970.963.6760 FAX 970.963.6761 maiL@a4arc.com CVI07/A1l3 DAlA17Cr) 12011'le � / WEST ELEVATION / 1/4"=1r-0" NORTHWEST CORNER A EXISTING ;44 # CORNERSOUTHWEST - EXISTING WEST ELEVATION - EXISTING PREVIOUSLY REMOVED Graphic Scale 0 2 4 8 In Feet: 1" r 4' INN 601 East Hopkins Ave. First Floor Aspen, Colorado Date I Issued For 5.20.14 I CITY OF ASPEN DESIGN REVIEW Project No: 1307 Drawn By: MEH Building Elevation A or". 1