Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.601 E Hyman Ave.0023.2013.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0023.2013.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 18 225 801 PROJECTS ADDRESS 601 E HYMAN AVE PLANNER SARA NADOLNEY CASE DESCRIPTION FINAL COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE STAN CLAUSEN DATE OF FINAL ACTION 06.24.14 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.19.15 4 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) being or rep esenting an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010.(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen(14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this v?5 day 0f. nih0 , 2013, by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC DEVELOP ENOTAPTICPROVAL _ My COmm1SslOn expires: •�� `—C-�L Notice isshea"i'given to the general public of the the creation 01 a vestedfproperty rdeveloriight pursuant to �. the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24,Article 68,Colorado Revised Statutes, ing to the following described property.Vctoai n Notary Public City of Aspen,Pitkin the North ICouMy,CO,and'mo'ekco00, monly known as 601 E.Hyman Ave.,Aspen,Colo- �°•e°pee ••°•e� rado,81611,by order of the Community DevelFor op- 0 - a ' nformationtconta tSara NadolnyJune 211h, 3at the Cit of 1 UNDAM. p a Aspen Community Development Dept.130 S.Ga- 1 ATTACHMENTS: ° • lena St,Aspen,Colorado(970)429-273g 'f```�!pp��//�� o ki k!V4`4lIYV a ��lty°'AS e" COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • Publish in The As • 2013. [9304050] pen Times Weekly on June 27, -'ee •� Cf e My CffffLt&Eon 4 C ) DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development.plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order,unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. ,This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. .Victorian Square LLC, 601 E. Hyman Ave, Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address Victorian Square North Half of Lots A, B & C, Block 100, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; 601 E. Hyman Ave, Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Victorian Square LLC received Commercial Design Review that will permit the construction of a three-story mixed-use building containing 7,317 sq. ft. of net leasable space, and 1,806 sq. ft. of free- market net livable space. The building measures at 36' at its highest roof point,-with an elevator overrun of 38'. The site has been approved with 595 sq..ft. of public amenity space, which is in the form of an enhanced/widened public walkway with street trees and additional landscaping_ The project requires the mitigation of 4.90 Full-Time Equivalents (FTE's), which the Applicant will provide for in the form of Certificates of Affordable HousingCredit. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment DescribingPlan Approval by the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission of Final Commercial Design Review via Resolution 14, Series 2013 on 6/18/2013. Land Use-Approvals) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) June 27, 2013 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) June 28, 2016 Expiration.Date of Development Order.(The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued thi 24S`da of une,2013, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Chris Bendon, Community Development Director 1 l� MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Sara Nadolny, Planning Technician THRU: Chris Bendon,Community Development Director MEETING DATE: June 18,2013 RE: 601 E.Hyman Ave—Final Commercial Design Review APPLICANT/OWNER: building located at 601 E. Hyman Avenue. The Victorian Square, LLC Applicant has previously received approvals for Conceptual Commercial Design and Growth REPRESENTATIVE: Management reviews, and has vacated the building's Stan Clauson, Stan Clauson Associates condo plat and covenants. and Sarah Broughton, Rowland& Broughton Architecture and Urban STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Design The Applicant has responded to direction from Staff and the Commission throughout the design process, and LOCATION: presented an attractive and appropriate design for the 601 E. Hyman Street, City and proposed building. Staff is not recommending any Townsite of Aspen design changes to this application. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the CURRENT ZONING&USE minor expansion of commercial, lodge or mixed use The existing building is located in the development and Final Commercial Design Review, Commercial (C-1) zone district. The with conditions. site is currently used commercially. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is proposing the demolition of the existing commercial building and its replacement with a mixed-use building. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests Planning and Zoning Commission approval of the application for Final Commercial w Design Review and minor expansion of commercial, lodge or mixed-use � k development relating to the demolition and redevelopment of the existing Figure A:Photo image of the subject property 1 1 BACKGROUND: 601 E. Hyman Ave is a two-story commercial building, commonly known as the Garfield & Hecht office building. The Applicant proposes to demolish the two-story commercial building and replace it with a three-story mixed-use building, containing 7,317 square feet of commercial net leasable space, to be divided between the basement, first and second floors, and a 1,806 square foot free market third floor residential unit. � A l. Figure B:Vicinity map LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: • Final Commercial Design Review — Commercial Character Area pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Review. An application for Commercial Design Review requires the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public hearing, to approve, approve with conditions or disapprove of the Commercial Design Review. • Minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed-use development pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.060.5, Growth Management Quota System, Administrative applications. An application for the expansion of commercial net leasable space for mixed-use buildings up to (250) square feet may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Community Development Director. Staff has chosen to combine this approval with Final Commercial Design Review before the Planning and Zoning Commission, as it relates to the project's final approvals. 2 r Previous Approvals Conceptual Commercial Design Review was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission through Resolution No. 19, Series of 2012. Growth Management Review was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission through Resolution No. 22, Series of 2012, with a recommendation to Council supporting Subdivision Review in the same Resolution. The Applicant has since vacated the condominium plat (Reception No. 598931) and covenants (Reception No. 598932), thereby circumventing the step to City Council to complete the Subdivision review. 9 STAFF COMMENTS 1. COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW: This application requires review under the Commercial Design Standards as they apply to all commercial, lodging, and mixed-use development containing a commercial component within the City of Aspen. The property is located in the Commercial Character Area of the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. This property is just outside of the Commercial Core Historic District. The design purpose within the Commercial Character Area is to create a vibrant, well-connected pedestrian system with attractive public spaces, and buildings that provide a well-defined street edge with height and variation appropriate for the pedestrian scale. This area is influenced by lodge development to the south, and is undergoing many changes with the development of the neighboring Muse and Aspen Art Museum buildings. These buildings tend to reflect a more modern design, while utilizing materials that are historic to the area, such as masonry and wood. Storefront design is typically less characteristic of this area. Emphasis is placed on providing for an improved pedestrian experience to draw pedestrians from the adjacent Commercial Core and increase the overall vitality of the area. Existing Conditions The site is on the corner of E. Hyman Ave and S. Hunter St, with a total lot size is 4,500 s£ A two-story commercial building currently exists on the property, with a gross square footage of 6;292 sf and a commercial net leasable area of 5,487 sf. The property hosts 595 sf(13%) of public amenity space. There is no on-site parking provided. Proposed Development The Applicant is proposing a three-story mixed-use building, with a total gross square footage of 9,304 sf. The proposed commercial net leasable area is 7,3,17sf, and the free-market net livable area is 1,806 sf. The property will host 562.50 sf(12.5%) of public amenity space, and no on- site parking will be provided. 3 The key design objectives of the Commercial Character Area are provided below: The Commission must find that the new development will meet these objectives. A. Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. Staff Comment: Staff finds that the proposed building strengthens the,sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District in its design, which incorporates mainly traditional materials, and yet has an understated modern motif. This building is a compliment to the traditional building practices found in the Commercial Core District, but with a bit more modern variety. The building has been designed with three distinct modules, which vary in their setback from the property line. These modules and materials serve to reduce the massing from a pedestrian perspective, and provide visual interest while strengthening the street edge. Ground floor retail is planned for the building, providing a draw for pedestrians to move from the Commercial Core to this area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. B. Maintain a retail orientation. Staff Comment: The Applicant is proposing ground floor retail in the building's design. The ground floor has also been design with floor to ceiling windows at the edge of the pedestrian walkway. This high degree of transparency will allow pedestrians to look into these commercial spaces, and will enhance the street vitality along E. Hyman Ave and S. Hunter St: Staff finds this criterion to be met. C. Promote creative, contemporary design. Staff Comment: .The proposed building has been designed in such a way as to express a modern design with traditional aspects. The design has contemporary forms, and uses primarily traditional materials, such as wood, brick, glass and steel. The proposed laminate is a more contemporary material .that complements the traditional materials used. The cantilevered second and third stories and the numerous green roofs add to a more contemporary feel of the design. The building will integrate well with the contemporary designs of the Aspen Art Museum at the opposite end of the block and the neighboring Muse building. The proposed building will be situated orthogonally on the site, complying with the traditional development patterns found throughout this character area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. D. Encourage a well-defined street wall. Staff Comment: The Applicant has proposed an enhanced pedestrian walkway around the building, a design which was previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and serves as public amenity space for the proposed project. The building's ground level will directly abut this walkway, creating a strong edge to for both Hunter St and Hyman Ave. The building's modules help to add variety that is more unique than found in the Commercial Core Historic District. The street facade is defined by the street trees that are proposed 4 between the pedestrian walkway and the roadway. Benches and landscaping are planned for the public amenity space. Staff finds this criterion to be met. E. Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. Staff Comment: The proposed building is varied in height and designed with differing modules, with the highest module measuring at 35' and the lowest module measuring at 27'. The building'selevator tower reaches a height of 38'. The building has been designed to reflect the original lot width. The proposed building is slightly lower than its neighboring Muse building, and significantly lower than the Aspen Art Museum, therefore recognizing a range in the buildings found in the Commercial Area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. F. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. Staff Comment: The application includes two outdoor benches for public use, which are shielded from the outdoor elements by an overhead canopy. Because they are covered these benches do not contribute to the amount of approved public amenity space; however they do contribute to the success of the outdoor public space for this project. Public amenity space has been previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in the form of a widened public walkway that is visually enhanced with decorative pavers. The outdoor public space is further enhanced by the installation of street trees that will buffer pedestrians from street traffic and off-street parking. The enhanced walkway will abut the building's ground floor, and will allow the pedestrian direct interaction with the windows of the -first floor retail. Staff finds this criterion to be met. G. Promote variety in the street level experience. Staff Comment: The proposed building has been designed with a high degree of transparency at the first floor level, which is intended to house retail stores. Architectural details include variation in materials used on each module of the building as well as the covered walkway along the Hyman facade which will allow pedestrians to walk or use the benches.and remain protected from the elements. Enhanced landscaping in the form of street trees will add to the street level experience. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM(GMQS): Minor Expansion of a Commercial,Lodge or Mixed-use Development. The Applicant has made some minor changes from what was previously approved through the GMQS review to the floor area the commercial and residential aspects of the proposed development. Although the mix is proposed to remain the same, with basement, first and second floors as commercial and a third floor free-market residential unit, the size of the use at each floor has changed. - 5 • 1 Level Formerly Proposed Currently Proposed -Basement 1,826 sf net leasable 1,816 sf net leasable First Floor 3,045 sf net leasable 2,497 sf net leasable Second Floor 2,394 sf net leasable 3,004 sf net leasable Third Floor 1,835 sf net livable 1,806 sf net livable Formerly 7,265 net leasable space was proposed. Currently 7,317 sf of net leasable space is proposed. This is a change in 52 sf. According to Section 26.470.060.5 Minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed-use development of the Code, an expansion that involves less than 250 sf.of new net leasable space may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Community Development Director. Staff has chosen to combine this with the Commercial Design Review discussed previously so that this change may be recorded in the attached Resolution. Staff has found the proposed increase to be allowed for in terms of available growth management allotments, and therefore recommends.approval of this increase. The change to net livable square footage has no impact on the amount of growth management allotments the Applicant may receive, as one residence, regardless of size, needs one GMQS allotment. This was previously approved in Resolution 22, Series of 2012 (attached as Exhibit G), and does not need to be re-addressed. Previous approval required the Applicant to provide mitigation for 4.79 Full Time Equivalents (FTE'). With the addition of net leasable space, the Applicant will be required to provide mitigation for 4.90 FTE's. As previously approved, the Applicant continues to request approval to provide for mitigation in the form of the purchase of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Engineering— The site design must meet the requirements of the Urban Runoff Management Plan. A compliant drainage plan must be submitted with the building permit application. All sidewalk, curb and gutter must meet the Engineering Standards as outlines in Title 21. A construction management plan must be submitted prior to building permit that addresses staging and encroachments. An excavation stabilization plan must be submitted prior to building permit. 2. Parks— Landscaping in the Right-of-Way (ROW) is subject to the requirements found in Chapter 21.20 of the Municipal Code. All plantings in the ROW shall be approved by the Parks and Engineering Depts. Improvements to the ROW shall include Silva Cell Technology and pavers placed within the planting zone(5' from the back of curb). These improvements should coordinate with the neighboring 625 E. Hyman Ave improvements to the extent possible. An approved tree permit is required prior to the removal of any 6 . 1 tree, or impact on any tree's drip line, and shall be approved prior to building permit. Parks shall approve the final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the proposed development meets.all of the necessary criteria for development in the Commercial Character Area and Commercial (C-1) zone district. Staff feels the presence of ground level retail combined with a high degree of transparency at the edge of the enhanced walkway will serve create a more vibrant pedestrian experience and bring interest to an area of the city that generally lacks the vitality of the adjacent downtown core. The building has been appropriately designed to act as an anchor for this block of Hyman Ave, and will maintain interest from the street level with its varied modules and materials. The proposed building is an appropriate and attractive addition to a block that is undergoing a complete makeover. The addition of 52 sf of net leasable space (requiring 52 net leasable growth management allotments)permits additional commercial space within the proposed development, maintains the required ratio of commercial to free-market square footage, and does not present an issue for available growth management allotments for this calendar year. Community Development Department Staff recommend that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Applicant's request for minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed-use development, as well as Final Commercial Design Review, as proposed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review board for this Final Commercial Design Review. If the Commission chooses to recommend approval for the request, they may use this motion "I move to make a recommendation to approve the request for Final Commercial Design Review and the Minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed-use development for 601 E. Hyman Ave, with conditions as outlines in the Resolution." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A— Commercial Design Review Criteria Exhibit B— Final Review Design Guidelines—Key Objectives Exhibit C— Final Review Design Guidelines—Commercial Character Area Exhibit D - Updated GMQS Calculations Exhibit E - City Department Referrals Exhibit F - Application Exhibit G - Approved Resolutions Exhibit H - Vacation of Condo Declaration and Covenants 7 Exhibit A Review Criteria Commercial Design Review A. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, or any deviation from the standards provides a more appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested design elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the standards. Staff Response: The proposed development has been found by Staff to meet the requirements of Section 26.412.060 of the Commercial Design Standards, and no deviations from these standards are being sought by the Applicant. During the conceptual commercial design review process, the public amenity space was approved at 12.5% of the lot, rather than the 13% that currently exists on-site; however, that which is approved meets the standards for public amenity space as found in this chapter of the land use code. The Applicant has indicated intent to comply with the Suggested design elements in Section 26.412.070. Stafffinds this criterion to be met B. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, to the greatest extent practical. Changes to the fagade of the building may be required to comply with this Section. Staff Response: The existing building is exclusively used for commercial use, and no conversion of uses is required. Staff finds this criterion to be non-applicable. C. The application shall comply with the guidelines within the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines as determined by the appropriate Commission. The guidelines set forth design review criteria, standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The'City shall determine when a proposal is in compliance with the criteria, standards and guidelines. Although these criteria, standards and guidelines are relatively comprehensive, there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be. identified. In such a case, the City must determine that the intent of the guideline is still met, albeit through alternative means. Staff Response: Staff has determined that the application meets the standards of the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines for the Commercial Character Area. The standards are specifically discussed in Exhibit B, following. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1 Exhibit B ° Final Review Design Guidelines Commercial Character Area Key Design Objectives Commercial Character Area Design Objectives: These are key design objectives for the Commercial Area. The City must find that any new work will help to meet them: 1. Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. Strengthening the definition of the street edge in a manner similar to the Commercial Core is desired..-At the same time, the Commercial Area is a place where more variety in design is encouraged. Imitating historic styles is not an objective,but re-establishing a sense of a stronger fundamental framework will enhance the urban qualities of this area and is a priority. Staff Finding: The proposed building strengthens the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District in its design, which incorporates mainly traditional materials, and yet has an understated modern motif. The building has been designed with three distinct modules, which vary in their setback from the property line. These modules and materials serve to reduce the massing from a pedestrian perspective, and provide visual interest while strengthening the street edge. The first floor has a high degree of transparency, which also strengthens the building's relationship to pedestrians who will be able to see into the ground floor commercial uses. The proposed ground and second level commercial spaces will help draw interest and vitality to the area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. Maintain a retail orientation. Greater retail presence should be achieved to ensure an enhanced street vitality and an enriched and more urban definition of the commercial street frontage. Staff Finding: The Applicant is proposing ground floor retail in the building's design. The ground floor has also been design with floor to ceiling windows'at the edge of the pedestrian walkway. This high degree of transparency will allow pedestrians to look into these commercial spaces, and will enhance the street vitality along E. Hyman Ave and S. Hunter St. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Promote creative, contemporary design. Designs should seek creative new solutions that convey the community's continuing interest in exploring innovations. At the same time, the fundamental principles of traditional design must be respected. This means that each project should strike a balance in the design variables that are presented in the following pages. Staff Finding: The proposed building has been designed in such a way as to express a modern design with traditional aspects. The design follows natural forms, and uses primarily traditional materials, such as wood, brick, glass and steel. The proposed 2 laminate is a more contemporary material that complements the more traditional materials. The cantilevered second and third stories and the numerous green roofs add to a more contemporary feel of the design. The building will integrate well with the contemporary designs of the Aspen Art Museum at the opposite end of the block and the neighboring Muse building. The proposed building will be situated orthogonally on the site, complying with the traditional development patterns found throughout this character area. Staff finds this criterion to be met 4. Encourage a well-defined street wall. The intent is to more clearly establish a strongly defined street wall, but with some greater variety than in the Commercial Core Historic District since the historic building edge is not as defined. A stronger street faeade definition should be achieved while at the same time recognizing the value of public dining and landscaped space. Staff Finding: The Applicant has proposed an enhanced pedestrian walkway around the building, a design which was previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and serves as public amenity space for the proposed project. The building's ground level will abut this walkway, and be made of transparent glass which will allow pedestrians a view into the commercial spaces within. The building's modules help to add variety that is more unique than found in the Commercial Core Historic District. The street facade is defined 'by the street trees that are proposed between the pedestrian walkway and the roadway. Benches and landscaping are planned for the public amenity space. Staff finds this criterion to be met 5. Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. It is important that a range and variation in building height and scale in the Commercial Area be recognized in future developments. Larger buildings should be varied in height and reflect original lot widths. Staff Finding: The proposed building is varied in height and designed with differing modules, with the highest module measuring at 35' and the lowest module measuring at 27. The building's elevator tower reaches a height of 3K The building has been designed to reflect the original lot width. The proposed building is slightly lower than its neighboring Muse building, and significantly lower than the Aspen Art Museum, therefore recognizing a range in the buildings found in the Commercial Area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. Providing space in association with individual buildings remains important,but should be balanced with much greater building street presence and corner definition. Staff Finding: The application includes two outdoor benches for public use, which are shielded from the outdoor elements by an overhead canopy. Because they are covered these benches do not contribute to the amount of approved public amenity space; however they do contribute to the success of the,outdoor public space for this project. Public amenity space has been previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in the form of a widened public walkway that is visually enhanced with decorative pavers. 3 The outdoor public space is further enhanced by the installation of street trees that will buffer pedestrians,from street traffic and off-street parking. The enhanced walkway will abut the building's ground floor, and will allow the pedestrian direct interaction with the windows of the first floor retail. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 7. Promote variety in the street level experience. Display cases, architectural details and . landscaping are among the design elements that should be used. Staff Finding. The proposed building has been designed with a high degree of transparency at the first floor level, which is intended to house retail stores. Architectural details include variation in materials used on each module of the building as well as the covered walkway along the Hyman facade which will allow pedestrians to walk or use the benches and remain protected from the elements. Enhanced landscaping in the form of street trees will add to the street level experience. Staff finds this criterion to be met. i r 4 Exhibit C Final Review Design Guidelines Commercial Character Area 1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width(30 ft) as expressed by two or more of the following: • Variation in height at internal lot lines • Variation in the plane of the front fagade • Street fagade composition • Variation in architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the building module Staff Response: The newly proposed building reflects the traditional lots widths throughout three distinct building modules. There is a variation in height between all three:modules as well as in plane of the front faVade. Variation between each module is further achieved with the use of distinct material, which provides visual distinction between each module. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.30 The detailed design of the building fagade should reflect the traditional scale and rhythm of the block. This should be achieved using all of the following • The fenestration grouping • The modeling of the fagade • The design framework for the first floor storefront • Variation in architectural detail/or the palette of fagade materials Staff Response: The rectangular shape and grouping of windows found within the front faVade of the largest module on the building complement those found within neighboring building, such as the adjacent Muse building. The first floor is primarily comprised of floor to ceiling windows, providing transparency to the commercial areas within. The choice and color of the building's materials vary across each facade, creating a sense of visual interest. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.31 A building should reflect the architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the street fagade. The following should be addressed: • The design and definition of the traditionally tall first floor • The vertical proportions of the upper level fenestration pattern and ratio of solid wall to window area. Staff Response: The proposed building has been designed with a traditionally taller first floor, which reaches 13', with the second and third floors reaching a lesser height of 11'. The first floor has been designed primarily with floor. to ceiling glass, thereby increasing the transparency of the main floor. The upper floor fenestration .is rectangular, thereby complimenting that found on the ground floor. The large cutaway on the face of the second 5 module found closest to the corner of Hunter.St and Hyman Ave. creates an interesting feature that also complements the remaining fenestration pattern. The finish is more solid on the upper floor, creating a sense of balance with the amount of fenestration found throughout the building. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.32 A building should reflect the three-dimensional characteristics of the street fagade in the strength and depth of modeling, fenestration and architectural detail. Staff Response: The building has been proposed with three distinct modules, which have varied setbacks from the property line. This creates a sense of strength and depth in the building's modeling. The first floor is comprised primarily of floor to ceiling glass, with additional windows punched into the upper floor levels. This fenestration creates additional depth . to the building's design. The building complements the three-dimensional characteristics of the street facade in fenestration, and adds to the strong street edge with a pedestrian friendly atmosphere. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.33 Any new building shall be designed to maintain a minimum of 9 feet from floor to ceiling on all floors. Staff Response: The ground floor ceiling measures at a height of 13', while the second and third floors measure at a height of 11' Staff finds this criterion to be met 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upper floors. • The first floor should be the tallest floor to floor height in the building • The first floor of the primary fagade should be predominantly transparent glass • Upper floors should be perceived as being more opaque than the street level. Upper story windows should have a vertical emphasis. • Highly reflective or darkly tinted glass is inappropriate t Express the traditional distinction in floor heights between the street levels and upper levels through detailing, materials and fenestration. The presence of a belt course is an important feature in this relationship. Staff Response: At a height of 13 feet, the first floor is the tallest floor of the building. Further distinction is made by the predominance of glass found at the front and western facades. Upper story windows have a vertical emphasis that is complementary to the shape of the fenestration found on the ground floor. The upper floor is composed of materials that are more solid than transparent No highly reflective or darkly tinted glass is planned for this building. Traditional distinction in floor-heights is expressed between the street and upper levels of the building through the change in materials, being primarily glass on the ground floor and laminate wood panels on the Hyman St fapade, and a transition between brick and glass of varying height on the Hunter St faVade. While a belt course is not implemented in the design,Staff feels the floors are distinct as designed. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level frontage. • This should be 13-15 ft. in floor to floor height on the first floor • The minimum required first floor height must be maintained for at least the first 50 foot depth of the lot, and may only be dropped to a lower height beyond that point for areas that are devoted to storage, circulation, offices, restaurant kitchens, alley commercial spaces, or similar secondary uses. Staff Response:As previously mentioned, the first floor of the proposed building maintains a height of 13'. This height carries through the entirety of the first floor, and does not drop at any point to a lower height. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.36 Minimize the appearance of a tall third floor. • Where a third floor's floor to ceiling height is in excess of 12 ft., it should be set back a minimum of 15 ft. from the street fagade to reduce the apparent height. • Increase the parapet height to screen the visual impact of a tall top floor. • The design of a setback third floor shall be simpler in form, more subdued in modeling, detail and color than the primary fagade Staff Response: The proposed building's third floor measures at a height of 11', and is not set back from the street facade. The massing of the third floor is reduced by the modules, which step up and down across the top length of the building. The height of the third floor is also minimized by the 19' setback elevator overrun on the building's Hyman Ave facade. The second and third floors are designed to work together with a subdued color.palate and uncomplicated design as compared with the primarily glass first story. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.37 The first floor fagade should be designed to concentrate interest on the first level, using the highest quality of design, detailing and materials. • A strong and distinctively designed retail framework for the first floor of the building • An entryway designed to use the full height of the storefront • A distinct change in the palette of materials used for the first floor design framework • The depth and strength of the modeling of elements and details Staff Response: The first floor is designed primarily with all glass materials, which creates a high degree of transparency and a distinctive floor. The first story is proposed as retail space, and the glass windows are conducive,to supporting a successful retail environment. The building has multiple entryways, 1.38 The retails entrance should be at sidewalk level. 7 • All entrances shall be ADA compliant • On sloping sites the retail frontage should be as close to a level entrance as possible Staff Response: The proposed building has been designed with all retail entrances at sidewalk level, The Applicant has assured Staff that the entrances will be designed to be ADA compliant. This is a flat site, with no slopes to mitigate fon Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures. • An airlock entry that projects forward of the primary fagade at the sidewalk is inappropriate • Adding temporary entries during the winter season detracts from the character of the historic district • Using a temporary vinyl or fabric "airlock" to provide protection from winter weather is not permitted Staff Response: An airlock is proposed for the midblock entrance on Hyman Ave that leads to a central lobby from which all building uses maybe accessed The Applicant is proposing no externally projecting airlocks, nor any temporary vinyl or fabric airlocks. Staff finds.this criterion to be met. 1.40 Window area along the first floor shall be a minimum of 60% of exterior street fagade area when facing a principal street(s).. Staff Response: The building's front facade has been determined by Staff to be E. Hyman Ave. The proposed building's first floor front faVade is comprised primarily of glass, and exceeds the 60%minimum window area. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to maintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail frontage. Staff Response: The proposed building has been designed such that the first floor retail has a high degree of transparency, with floor to ceiling glass windows which will allow direct views into the commercial spaces within. This will maintain the character and transparency of traditional street level frontage. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.42 Design of the first floor storefront should include particular attention to the following: • The basic elements and proportions of storefront design • Depth and strength of modeling • The palette of materials and finishes used in both the structural framework and the storefront window • The concentration of architectural detail to ensure a rich visual experience 8 • The complimentary use of signage and lettering to enhance the retail and downtown character • The use of lighting to accentuate visual presence Staff Response: The first floor storefront has been designed with a variable front faVade, forgoing a flat face and creating visual interest with the use of the building's modules. The variable setbacks of the three modules also create depth and strength of modeling. The storefront is designed such that it has a great degree of transparency, and the entryways are easily located Attention has been paid to the materials and finishes of the structural framework with the use of various materials of complementary color. The Applicant has indicated intention to create signage and lighting that will enhance the character of the building, draw attention to the ground floor retail, and compliment the surrounding Commercial Character Area. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.43 Retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the street frontage, adjusted for the scale of the space. • It should be designed with a similar attention to architectural articulation, detail and materials. • These should have a richness of detail that is inviting to users. Staff Response: The proposed building does not have alley access, nor are there any retail spaces that are designed to face side courts. Staff finds this criterion to be not-applicable. 1.44 A large building should reflect the traditional lot-width in form and variation of its roof. This should be achieved through the following: • A set back of the top floor from the front fagade • Reflect the traditional lot width in the roof plane Staff Response: The proposed building's roof closely reflects the City's traditional lot widths in form. Three distinct modules within the building provide variation of the roof. The building's top floor is not setback from the front faVade, rather it actually overhangs the first story, a design element that was previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission during Conceptual Commercial Design Review. Staff finds this criterion to be met 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building • Group and screen mechanical units from view • Locate mechanical equipment to the rear of the roof area • Position, articulate and design rooftop enclosures or structures to reflect the modulation and character of the building 9 • Use materials which complement the design of the building facades • Design roof garden areas to be unobtrusive from the street • Use `green roof design best practice,where feasible - Staff Response: The proposed roofscape has been designed with very few mechanical features. The elevator overrun will impact the roof, and is setback from the building's front facade by approximately 18'. There area number of green roofs proposed The majority of mechanical equipment is proposed to be located in the basement of the building. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed • The palette of materials should be specified, including samples of materials as required Staff Response: The proposed building's materials are high quality and consist of brick, wood, laminate and steel. Visual samples of the materials can be found on sheet A0.5a of the application. 1.47 Building materials should have these features: • Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally • Reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance visual interest of the facade • Convey a human scale Staff Response: The proposed building's materials are complimentary to those found on other buildings in the Commercial Character Area, utilizing brick, wood, laminate and steel, and convey the types of materials found traditionally throughout the City. The use of the different materials throughout the building's modules will help to create visual interest. The high use of glass on the first story helps to break up the massing of the second module, reducing the scale of the building and providing transparency into the commercial areas. The use of modules further helps to convey a sense of human scale by setting back particular areas of the building,thereby minimizing its massing. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.48 A building or addition should reflect the quality and variation in material seen traditionally. Staff Response: The materials proposed for the building are those that have been used traditionally throughout the City. The design incorporates these traditional materials into a more modern design. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are use they shall be: • High quality in durability and finish • Detailed to convey a human scale • Compatible with a traditional masonry palette 10 Staff Response: The most contemporary of materials used is the laminate with wood finish, which is proposed for the second module of the building's front faiVade." This appears to be of high quality in durability and finish. The use of this material will help to soften the largest module on the building, and help it to balance the glass that is found on the first story, creating a building with a greater sense of human scale. This material is compatible with the more traditional materials (klass, brick and wood and steel) that are also proposed to be used on this building. Staff finds this criterion to be met 1.50 Materials used for the third floor accommodation set back from the street facades should be more subdued than primary facades Staff Response: The proposed building's was approved at conceptual design review by the Planning and Zoning Commission with second and third floors that\are cantilevered over the first floor. Therefore this standard does not fully apply to the proposed building. However, the upper floors are composed of laminate panels with a wood finish, and are a subdued, natural color which aid in balancing the glass that makes up the majority of the first floor. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 1.51 Paving and landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building area. Staff Response: The Applicant is proposing a widened walkway along the E. Hyman side of the building, which will serve to enhance the pedestrian experience along the block from the new Aspen Art Museum to the corner of Hyman and Hunter. New,street trees are proposed between the pedestrian walkway and the street, which will serve as a buffer for pedestrians I sing the walkway. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 11 RESOLUTION NO._ (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXED-USE BUILDING AND MINOR EXPANSION OF COMMERCIAL, LODGE.OR MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 E. HYMAN AVE,CITY OF ASPEN,PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Parcel ID: 2737-182-250-31,2737-182-250-28,2737-182-250-30, 2737-182-258-01, 2737-182-250-27, 2737-182-250-32,2737-182-250-33,2737-182-250-29 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Victorian Square, LLC (Applicant), represented by Stan Clauson of Stan Clauson Associates, Inc., requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission approve a Final Commercial Design for Mixed-Use development at 601 E. Hyman.Ave; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.412 of the Land Use Code, commercial design review approval may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant received Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 16, 2012 via Resolution 19, Series of " 2012; and, WHEREAS, the applicant received Growth Management Review approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission who also provided a favorable recommendation to City Council for Subdivision Review on December 4, 2012 via Resolution 22, Series of 2012; and, WHEREAS, the applicant proceeded. to vacate the condominium plat for Victorian Square Condominium Units 1-7 (Reception No. 598931) and to vacate all covenants for Victorian Square Condominiums(Reception No. 598932). WHEREAS, the applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for Final Commercial Design Review and Minor expansion of commercial, lodge or mixed-use development; and, WHEREAS,upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission.finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety and welfare. 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Final Commercial Design Review for the redevelopment of 601 E. Hyman, as illustrated in Exhibit A. Section 2• Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the minor expansion of commercial, lodge or mixed-use development, with an increase of 52 sq. ft. of net leasable space. This will increase the amount of Full-Time Equivalents (FTE's)that must be mitigated for, and is an addition to the previous approval received through Resolution 22, Series of 2013. Section 3• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development. proposal approvals as herein awarded are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3• This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or,unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted pursuant to Planning and Zoning Commission shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of the Development Order. No later than fourteen (14) days following the final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a Development Order as'set forth in this Resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall he substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 67, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 601 E. Hyman Avenue, 2 City of Aspen, CO by Resolution No. Series of 2013, of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. APPROVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 181h day of June, 2012. LJ Erspamer,Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deb Quinn,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Jackie Lothian,Deputy City Clerk Exhibit A: Approved Commercial Design Review Plans 3 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: (00 ,Aspen, CO SHE ULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: IT Q. q,-50 glIn 200 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that 1 have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 ?=tion n Land Use Code in the following manner: of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) '1 days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. ny Posting of notice.; By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the . day of , 20_, to and including the date,and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted .no I ice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred(300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A COPY of the o-017101-S and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However,the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. IS Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowled ed before me this `J 11 day of - 20.I3 by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PU LIC NOTICE RE::601 E.HYMA,J-GMOS APPROVAL UP- ' DATE AND FINA COMMERCIAL DESIGN RE- My commission expires: d! ` ` _ VIEW ! NOTICE IS HER BY GIVEN that a public hearing I will to held a h 0 p. June re,2013 at a meet- inn to begin i Co mi before the Aspen Plan- �`��ning and Zoning Commission,Sistevoa + ing Room,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to y consider an application submitted by Victorian Notary Public - Square,LLC of 601 E.Hyman Ave,for the proper- ty legally described as City and Townsite of Aspen, Block 100,the North%of Lots A,B&C,common- - Iy known as 601 E.Hyman Ave.,represented by Stan Clauson Associates Inc.The applicant is re- questing approval of a minor expansion of a com- mercial, om-mercial,lodge or mixed use development as well - - as approval of final commercial design review to develop a three-story building containing a mix of commercial and residential uses. For further in- formation,contact.Sara Nadolny at the City of As- Gen t. n ( t2130 S. alena S ,Aspen,,CO, 970)492739,Sara.ad- ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: oinypnz. "LjErspamer.Cha,, IE PUBLICATION Aspen Pla""' gand °"'ngCommission . PH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) Published In the Aspen Times Weekly on May 30, 2013.[9211842] E OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAID * APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 601 E. HYMAN—GMQS APPROVAL UPDATE AND FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 18, 2013 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Victorian Square, LLC of 601 E. Hyman Ave, for the property legally described as City and Townsite of Aspen, Block 100, the North '/2 of Lots A, B & C, commonly known as 601 E. Hyman Ave., represented by Stan Clauson Associates Inc. The applicant is requesting approval of a minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed use development as well as approval of final commercial design review to develop a three-story building containing a mix of commercial and residential uses. For further information, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, -. 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739, sara.nadolny@cityQfaspen.com., s/LJ Erspamer,Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on May 30, 2013 City of Aspen Account . 'i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 601 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen,CO' SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 18 June ,2013 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, Stan Clauson (name,please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E)of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: X Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the'Publication is attached hereto. X Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was.not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the 29 day of May , 2013 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. X Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the. information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred(300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. n/a Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing . as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) X Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested,to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30)days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended,whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. QnarGe V The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this 3 day of June ,2013 ,by Stan Clauson PATRICK S. RAWLEY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO My commission expires: .26, fu NOTARY ID#19994012259 My Commission Expires July,26,2016 Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPYOFTREPUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERSAND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIESNOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES INC ,. landscape architecture. planning. resort design 412 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 t.970/925-2323 f-970/92o-1628 info@scaplanning.com www.scaplanning.com 3 June 2013 Ms. Sara Nadolny, Planner Tech City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 601 East Hyman / Research of Mineral Estate Owners Dear Sara: On behalf of our clients, Victorian Square, LLC, and in connection with the application for Final Design Review for the properties located at 601 East Hyman,we have performed the public notice requirements as required by Sec. 26.304.060(E) of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Among the requirements contained in Sec. 26.304.060(E) is the requirement to notify affected mineral estate owners by certified mailing at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the public hearing. Stan Clauson Associates, Inc has researched the existence of mining claim or possession deeds dating to the late 19th century with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's records (the "Public Records") using the Title Policy issued by Pitkin County title, Inc., Policy Number 1312- 120156, issued to Victorian Square, LLC. A review of the Public Records does not generate any record of deeds relating to mining claims or possession deeds. This letter is submitted to you to confirm our good-faith attempts to locate a list of mineral estate owners. Please call me with any questions. vew:fly yours, Signed before me this 3rd day of June, 2013 by Stan Clauson. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Stan Claus n, AICP, ASLA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: .2 6 ju t44 40 STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES, INC. PA r a- \ c(C- Cc:. Andy Hecht, Esq. Notary Public Notary Public's Signature PATRICK S. RAWLEY NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID#19994012259 My Commission Expires July 26,2016 � n PUBLIC NOTICE DATE:June 18. 2013 TIME:4:30 pm PLACE: City Hall, 130 Galena St. Aspen. CO 8161.1 PURPOSE: Victorian Square LLC.601 E Hyman Ave, as owner of this property, is proposing to redevelop this property as a mixed use building and will appear before the Planning& Zoning Commission. Land use approvals include the minor expansion of a mixed-use development and final commercial design review. For more information contact the City of Aspen Planning Dept. 970-920-5090. o.Ya �Ty1• UI�� PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 601 E.HYMAN—GMQS APPROVAL UPDATE AND FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will beheld on Tuesday, June 18,2013 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Victorian Square, LLC of 601 E. Hyman Ave, for the property legally described as City and Townsite of Aspen,Block 100,the North %z of Lots A,B & C,commonly known as 601 E. Hyman Ave.,represented by Stan Clauson Associates Inc. The applicant is requesting approval of a minor expansion of a commercial, lodge or mixed use development as well as approval of final commercial design review to develop a three-story.building containing a mix of commercial and residential uses. For further information, contact Sara Nadolny at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2739., sara.nadolny@cityofaspen.com. s/LJ Erspamer,Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on May 30,2013 City of Aspen Account r: i i r Easy Peels Labels ' +� Bend along line to 1 Q AVERY®51600 i Use Avery@ Template 516.00 � Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTw � 1 2012 TRUST FBI RHODA ISRAEL 85% 308 HUNTER LLC 4 SKIERS LP 708 3RD AVE 490 WILLIAMS ST 1108 NORFLEET DR NEW YORK, NY 10017 DENVER, CO 80218 NASHVILLE,TN 372201412 514 AH LLC 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC 514 E HYMAN AVE 517 E HOPKINS AVE 402 MIDLAND PARK ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 610 EAST HYMAN LLC 630 EAST HYMAN LLC 633 SPRING II LLC C/O CHARLES CUNNIFFE 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE#207 610 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 635 E HOPKINS LLC ANDERSON ROBERT M&LOUISE E ASPEN ART MUSEUM 532 E HOPKINS 1021 23RD ST 590 N MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CHETEK,WI 54728 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN BLOCK 99 LLC ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC ASPEN GROVE ASSOCIATES LLP 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE#207. 51027 HWY 6&24#100 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 ASPEN KOEPPEL LLC ASPEN PLAZA LLC ASPEN SQUARE VENTURES.LLP 3551 ST GAUDENS RD PO BOX 1709 602 STEVE MARCUS 602 E COOPER#202 COCONUT GROVE, FL 331336530 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 AV STEIN LLC 19.08% AVP PROPERTIES LLC BASS CAHN 601 LLC 601 E HYMAN AVE 630 E HYMAN AVE#25 PO BOX 4060 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 BATTLE GERALD LIVING TRUST BAUM ROBERT E BELL MTN QUAL RES CONDO ASSOC HIXON BURT LIVING TRUST LLC ST PO BOX 2847 BOX 1518 320 S SPRING ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 OCKBRIDGE, MA 01262 ASPEN,CO 81611 BERN FAMILY ASPEN PROPERTY LLC BERSCH BLANCHE TRUST BG SPRING LLC 65 FIRST NECK LN 9642 YOAKUM DR 300 S SPRING ST#202 SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11968 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ASPEN,CO 81611' BIG HOPKINS LLC BISCHOFF JOHN C BOOGIES BUILDING OF ASPEN LLC 421 N BEVERLY DR#300 502 S VIA GOLONDRINA C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90210 TUCSON,AZ 85716-5843 534 E COOPER AVE ASPEN,CO 81611 �tlquettes fadles c)peter Repliez a la hachure afin de; www.avery.com = Utilisez le gabarit AVERY 5160 r Sens de reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY j chargement 1 1 1 1 r Easy Peel@ Labels Bend along line to + Q AVERY®51600 r Use AveryO Template 51600 feed Paper expose Pop-up Edge A BORGIOTTI CLAUDIO BPOE ASPEN LODGE#224 BRONSON RICHARD L TRUST 50% 10509 HUNTING CREST LN 210 S GALENA ST#21 4510 NE DELAMAR PL VIENNA,VA 22192 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEES SUMMIT, MO 64064 CALGI RAYMOND D CARVER RUTH A& MARTIN G CAVES KAREN W 134 TEWKESBURY RD 10 BYRON LN 1 BARRENGER CT SCARSDALE, NY 10583 MUSCATINE, IA 52761 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 CHATEAU ASPEN UNIT 21-A LLC CHATEAU ASPEN CONDO ASSOC 421 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CTR CJAR LLC 630 E COOPER AVE STE G 2514 LAKE MEAD DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816113551 LAFAYETTE,CO 80026 COOPER SPRINGS LLC COOPER STREET COMPANY COOPER STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC 4 EASTON OVAL 601 E HYMAN AVE C/O PYRAMID PROPERTY ADVISORS COLUMBUS,OH 43219 ASPEN, CO 81611 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN,CO 81611 COX JAMES E LIVING TRUST DALY CAROL Y REV TRUST DCGB LLC 3284 SURMONT DR 617 E COOPERATT GIORGIO RIGHETTI CFO LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 ASPEN,CO 81611 610 WEST 52 ST NEW YORK, NY 10019 DIBRELL CHARLES G JR&FRANCES DURANT AH LLC EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC 24 ADLER CIR PO BOX 4068 1601 ELM ST#4000 GALVESTON,TX 77551-5828 ASPEN,CO 81612 DALLAS,TX 75201 ECCHYMOSIS LLC ELLERON CHEMICALS CORP ERGAS VENESSA BLAIR&CLAUDE 4802 E 2ND ST#2 2101 WAUKEGAN RD#210 PO BOX 4316 LONG BEACH,CA 90803 BANNOCKBURN, IL 60015 ASPEN,CO 81612 EXELCEDAR INC 20% FEHR EDITH B REVOCABLE TRUST FERRY JAMES H III 534 E HYMAN AVE 543 FOX RUN DR BOX 166 ASPEN, CO 81611 CARBONDALE, CO 81623-8502 GLENCOE, IL 600220166 FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD FURNGULF LTD C/O PITKIN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC FLY MARIE N A COLO JOINT VENTURE 7447 PEBBLE POINTE 520 E COOPER W BLOOMFIELDMI 48322 616 E HYMAN AVE , ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 GELD LLC GILBERT GARY GOFEN ETHEL CARO TRUSTEE C/O LOWELL MEYER 1556 ROYAL BLVD 1 455 CITY FRONT PLAZA PO BOX 1247 GLENDALE,CA 91207 CHICAGO, IL 60611 ASPEN,CO 81612-1247 Irtiquettes fatales A peler 1 Repltez$la hachure afin dei www.avery.com Utilisez le abarit AVERY®5160 Sens de reveler le rebord Po -u TM" ' 1-800=G0-AVERY 9 t charnement p p 1 1 i i r Easy Peel@ Labels i Bend along line to �. n AVERY@ 5160 Use AveryO Template 51600 feed Paper expose Pop-up Edgem V 1 GOLDEN PANTHERS LLC GONE WEST LLC GOODING SEAN A 80%&RICHARD L 20% 60 S MARKET ST#1400 401 W CENTER C/OSAN JOSE,CA 95113-2396 SEARCY,AR 721451406 620 PARAGON RANCH INC 620 E HYMAN AVE#1 E ASPEN, CO 81611 GORDON LEONARD&ELLEN GREENWAY COMPANY INC GROSFELD ASPEN PROP PART LLC 12204 GALESVILLE DR 666 TRAVIS ST#100 10880 WILSHIRE BLVD#2222 GAITHERSBURG, MD 20878 SHREVEPORT, LA 71101 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 HEMP SUZANNE LIV TRUST HENDRICKS SIDNEY J HIMAN LLC POMONA RD YOLANDE EVERHARD PO BOX 6159 15470 15470 P MO WI 53005 6614 LAKE VILLE RD SWANBOURNE WA 6010 BROOKPETALUMA,CA 94954-9256 AUSTRALIA, HORSEFINS LLC HUNKE CARLTON J LVG TRST HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP 601 E HOPKINS AVE 4410 TIMBERLINE DR SW 602 E COOPER#202 ASPEN,CO, 81611 FARGO, ND 58103 ASPEN,CO 81611 ISRAEL KENNETH 25% JENNE LLP JOSHUA&CO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS 615 OCEAN BLVD 1510 WINDSOR RD LLC GOLDEN BEACH, FL 33160 AUSTIN,TX 77402 300 S HUNTER ST ASPEN,CO 81611 JOYCE EDWARD KOEPPEL KEVIN F KRAJIAN RON 1310 RITCHIE CT 4150 PARK AVE 617 E COOPER AVE#114 CHICAGO, IL 60610 MIAMI, FL 33133 ASPEN,CO 81,611 LCT LP KUTINSKY BRIAN TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MALLARD ENTERPRISES LP 26480 NORMANDY RD 317 SIDNEY BAKER S#400 FRANKLIN, MI 480251034 . PO BOX 101444 KERRVILLE,TX 78028 NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 MARTELL BARBARA MATTHEWS ZACHARY MAVROVIC ERNA 702 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 10582 530 E 72ND ST APT 15-C ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10021 MAYFAIR INVESTMENTS LLC MCMURRAY WILLIAM&HELEN MJM AMENDED&RESTATED TRUST PO BOX 268 29 MIDDLE HEAD RD 1776 SOUTH LN RICHMOND VICTORIA 3121 MOSMAN NSW 2088 NORTHBROOK, IL°60062 AUSTRALIA, AUSTRALIA, MJM HOLDINGS II LLC MOEN DONNE&ELIZABETH FAM TRUST MORRIS ROBERT P 1701 GOLF RD 203 .8 CABALLEROS RD 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 ROLLING MEADOWS, IL 60008 TOWER 3 STE ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ASPEN, CO 81611 Ittiquettes fadles A peler AReptiez ii to hachure afin de; www.avery.com = Utilisez le abarit AVERY@ 5160 Sens de . reveler le rebord Pop-up -1=800-GO-AVERY - 9 j chargement t 1 Easy Peel@ Labels i ® Bend along line to F o AVERY@ 51600 i Use Avery@ Template 51600 � Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edgem � 1 MYSKO BOHDAN D N S N ASSOCIATES INC NATTERHELEN 615 E HOPKINS 11051 W ADDISON ST 67 BAYPOINT CRIES ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 OTTAWA ONTARIO CANADA K2G6R1, NEUMANN MICHAEL NIELSON COL STEVE&CAROL D NJ STEIN LLC 52.98% 7381 MOHASNIC DR 501 S FAIRFAX 418 E COOPER AVE#207 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301 ALEXANDRIA,VA 22314 ASPEN,CO 81611 NONNIE LLC OBERHOLTZER JORDAN OLITSKY TAMAR&STEPHEN PO BOX 565 PO BOX 10582 PO BOX 514 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 P&L PROPERTIES LLC PACIFIC WEST INVESTMENTS LLC PEARSON REBECCA J 101 S 3RD ST#360 320 MARTIN ST#100 1610 JOHNSON DR GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81501 BIRMINGHAM, MI 480091485 STILLWATER, MN 55082 PETERSON CHRISPY&JAMES E PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% 867 HAVEN CREST CT NORTH ASSOC 534 E HYMAN AVE GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81506 517 W NORTH ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PLATNIUM GLOBAL VENTURES LLC PORTE BROOKE RAHLEK LTD AT BANK OF AMERICA 344 PROSPECT ST#D 3520 PADDOCK RD 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD LA JOLLA, CA 92037 WESTON, FL 33331 HOUSTON,TX 77025 RED FLOWER PROP.CO PTNSHP REICH DANIEL S TRUST 20%. REICH MELVIN L TRUST 80% 575 MADISON AVE#1006 6 RINCON ST 4609 SEASHORE DR NEW YORK,NY 100222511 IRVINE, CA 92702 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92663 REUSS LIGHT LLC REVOLUTION PARTNERS LLC RG COOPER ST 4.83% PO BOX 5000 PO BOX 1247 C/O RONALD GARFIELD SNOWMASS VILLAGE,CO 81615 ASPEN,.CO 81612 601E AVE ASPEN,,COC81611 ROSS JOHN F RUBENSTEIN ALAN B&CAROL S RUST TRUST 7600 CLAYTON RD 57 OLDFIELD DR 9401 WILSHIRE BLVD#760 ST LOUIS, MO 63117 SHERBORN, MA 01770 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 RUTLEDGE REYNIE S&S REALTY PARTNERS LLC SANDIFER C W JR TRUST 50% 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR 1040 FIFTH AVE#2C 240 LINDEN DR SEARCY,AR 72143 NEW YORK, NY 10028 BOULDER,CO 80304 Eticluettes faelles A peler R '� Repliez 6 la hachure afin de; www.avery com Utilisez le abarit AVERY 5160 r Sens de r6v6ler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY J j charaement 1 1 Easy PeelO Labels Bend along line to 11 a AVERY 5160® � Use Avery®Template 5160 . feed Paper �� expose Pop-up Edger"' 1 SCHEUERMAN JOANNE E SCHNITZER KENNETH L&LISA L SEGUIN JEFF W&MADALYN B TRUST 200 LOCUST ST#23A 2100 MCKINNEY AVE#1760 617 E COOPER#412 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 DALLAS,TX 75201 ASPEN,CO 81611 SEGUIN MARY E TRUST SHUMATE MARK SILVER DIP EQUITY VENTURE LLC 2404 LORING ST#155 BLDG 421 G ABC 2100 MCKINNEY STE 1760 SAN DIEGO, CA 92109 ASPEN,CO 81611 DALLAS,TX 75201 SJA ASSOCIATES LLC STEIN BUILDING LLC 23.11% STERLING TRUST COMP 418 E COOPER AVE#207 601 E HYMAN AVE 2091 MANDEVILLE CYN RD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049, SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC TENNESSEE THREE 300 S SPRING ST#301 567 SAN NICOLAS DR PENTHOUSE PO BOX 101444 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 TENNESSEE THREE RENTALSC/O LE TERMINELLO DENNIS J&KERRY L THOMPSON ROSS& LYNETTE 5033 03 J H OLDD HICKORY BLVD 656 RIDGEWAY 1502 GREYSTONE DR NASHVILLE,TN 37218-4020 ICKWHITE PLAINS, NY 10605-4323 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 NAS TOMKINS FAMILY TRUST TREUER CHRISTIN L VARADY LOTHAR&CHERYL TRUST 520 E COOPER AVE#209 5455 LANDMARKL PL#814 5036 MAUNALANI CIR ASPEN,CO 81611 GREENWOOD VILLAGE,CO 801111955 HONOLULU, HI 96816 VAUSE FAMILY TRUST WALLEN-OSTERAA REV LIVING TRUST WALLING REBECCA 3020 PLAZA DE MONTE 36 OCEAN VISTA 350 BLANCA AVE LAS VEGAS, NV 89102 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 TAMPA, FL 33606 WARNKEN MARK G WAVO PROPERTIES LIP WEIDEL LAWRENCE W PO BOX 556 512 1/2 E GRAND AVE#200 PO BOX 1007 STILLWATER, MN 550820556 DES MOINES, IA 50309-1942 MONROE,GA 30655 WEIGAND BROTHERS LLC WELLS RICHARD.A&SUSAN T TRUST WF SWEARINGEN LLC.. 150 N MARKET 100 N TRYON ST 47TH FLR 380 FOREST HILL RD WICHITA, KS 67202 CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 MACON,GA 3121'6 WILLIAMS CRAIG&LEE FAM PTNRSHP WISE JOSEPH WM SNOWMASS LLC 5577 CEDAR CREEK 1320 HODGES ST 500 FIFTH AVE#2440 HOUSTON,TX 77056 RALEIGH, NC 27604-1414 NEW YORK, NY 10110 Ittiquettes faciles A peter ARepliez a la hachure afin de www.averycom Utilisez le abarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord Po =u Tm 1.800-GO-AVERY 9 j chargement p p j Easy PeelO Labels i ABend along line to �. (� AVERYO 5160® Use Averyo Template 51600 feed Paper expose Pop-up Edgem V j WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE WOODS FRANK J III WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N 22750 WOODWARD AVE#204 51027 HWY 6&24 STE 100 13 BRAMLEY RD FERNDALE, MI 48220 GLENWOOD SPRINGS,CO 81601 LONDON W10 6SP UK, YERAMIAN CHARLES REV TRUST PO BOX 12347 ASPEN, CO 81612 ttiquettes faciles h peler A Repliez A la hachure afin de i www.avery.com Utilisez le abarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord Po -u TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 9 1 chargement p p 4 1 0 46 92 �V_ TROYER,TROUSDAI.E Feeet W TOWNHOMES S CONDOASSOCPAE� 625 zos This map/drawing/image is a graphical representation 5174EAST ASPEN TroyedTrousdale HOPKINS PLAZA LLC 601— r W of the features depicted and is not a legal Townhomes 635 E AVENUE LLC 615 representation. The accuracy may change • 533r,601 611 HOPKINS 204 517 o1'East depending on the enlargement or reduction. Hopkins LLC EAST a Copyright 2013 Aspen/Pitkin GIS HOPKINS 5!2412013 10:56:06AM C:\GIS%temp\May131300R_601EHymanAve.mxG CONDOASSOC Lu W H Z 700 EAST = 6,10 EASTi Tamarawood I MAN CONDO HYMAN LLC Building ASSOC PiNdn rPITKINY 620 CrandaCenter NTEB BUILDING rSuilding ES BANK 80% 616 700 702 704 706 708 710 534 ASPEN LLC 610 [W5 520FURNGULF LTD 700 EastPITKIN 608 TAMARAWOOD CDH � CENTER BUILDING Z CONDO ASSOC CONDO'ASSOC d E HYMAN AVE _ _300 SOUTH SPRING'ST 715 601 CONDO ASSOC 7.15 501 505 1 300 637 300 South 517 521 I Sprang. 302 COX JAMES ASPEN CORE 625 ASPEN ART 707 E LIVING VENTURES LLC MUSEUM 300 304 TRUST 633 SPRING - 308 308 II LLC r1 HUNTER 715 LLC 308 ASPENHOF r 312 DCGB LLC CONDO ASSOC 312 rIl 630 310 312 314 16 31 COOPER BOOGIES jREET BUILDING OF Chateau Be8 10 314 CONDO ASSO HUNTER PLAZA Aspen-- Mountain ASPEN LLC I ASSOCIATES LLP 316318 Cooper 9 CHATEAU 700 702 PUD704 706 708ff P 320 Street penhof 520 534 ASPEN CONDO BELL MOUNTAIN ff 600 602 620 624 ASSOC m QUALIFIED RESIDENCES D 500 508 N� E COOPER AVE 501 .-, 525 528531 533535 60Z605�607 609 611613 617 635 665 675 685 u711 02402 ASPEN GROVE C7 Square 411 404 ASSOCIATES 408 I LLP Bowman 409 406 Building U ' ASPEN SQUARE NJ'STEIN CONDO ASSOC LLC_52.98% BL'D B Date: November 26, 2012 Project: 601 E Hyman City of Aspen Engineering Department DRC Comments These comments are not intended to be exclusive, but an initial response to the project packet submitted for purpose of the DRC meeting: Drainage: General note: The design for the site must meet the Urban Runoff Management Plan Requirements. Staff was not able to determine whether or not.the site will meet these requirements. A full review will be completed when there is enough information to review. A compliant drainage plan must be submitted with a building permit application-This includes detaining.and providing water quality for the entire site. If the site chooses FIL, it can only be applied to existing impervious areas all new areas will need to discharge at historic rates. Staff was unable to determine whether or not the site is able to meet all the Drainage Principals: 1.Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. The WQCV vault indicates stormwater treatment was considered. 2.Use the entire site when planning for stormwater quality treatment. 3.Avoid unnecessary impervious area. 4.Reduce runoff rates and volumes to more closely match natural conditions. 5.Integrate stormwater quality management and flood control. 6.Develop stormwater quality facilities that enhance the site, the community, and the environment. 7.Use a treatment train approach. 8.Design sustainable facilities that can be safely maintained. 9. Design and maintain facilities with public safety in mind. Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter: General note: All sidewalk, curb and gutter must meet the Engineering Standards as outlined in Title 21. A number of issues should be examined. This includes the.following: 1. A direction ramp will be required. A directional ramp may interfere with the existing Type R stormwater inlet. The inlet may require modification. 2. A minimum walkway of 8 feet is required. 3. Use Silva Cells for tree plantings. Construction Management—Engineering is concerned about the Construction Impacts of this site. .The plan shall describe mitigation for: parking, staging/encroachments, and truck traffic. Note that the current code does not allow for any encroachments during the on-seasons (November 1 —April 15 and June 1 - Labor Day). Excavation Stabilization —Due to the proximity of the neighboring property and the excavation of the building the City will require an excavation stabilization plan prior to building permit submittal. Fee in Lieu--This project is considered a Major project and can opt to pay the Fee in Lieu for a portion of the detention requirements. Please refer to Section 2.12.140 of the Municipal Code. Memorandum Date: June 25,2012 To: Sara Nadolny, City of Aspen Planning From: Brian Flynn, Parks Department Re: Victorian Square;_601 E-Hyman ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Landscaping within the Public Right of Way: Landscaping in the public right of way will be subject to landscaping in the ROW requirements, Chapter 21.20. There shall be no plantings within the City ROW which are not approved by the City Parks Department and the Engineering Department. For planting specifications within the streetscape, please refer to www.aspenpitkin.com on the Natural Resource page/tree care/right of way planting scenario 2. The applicant has suggested, and Parks supports,using Silva Cell technology for the sub-grade structure for the plantings and sidewalk. Parks supports using the same tree grates as those approved for the Muse building located next door. Parks also supports the suggested street tree species, maple and ash, but requires that the trees be grouped with like species. Parks supports the suggested variety of maple Acerx freemanii Celebration. Irrigation is required and the landscape plans should indentify irrigation source and design. Tree Permit: Per City Code 13.20 an approved tree permit will be required before any tree is removed or impacted under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior to approval of building permits. If a permit is necessary, contact the Parks Department at 920-5120 or download the permit at www.asl2enpitkin.com on the Natural Resource page, click on the 2012 tree permit tab. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or as an on-site planting per City Code 13.20. Parks will approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. • a if-M APR 11 2013 PPI n s' aeemdht betvve¢rt'ttlf Cites.f Property PFibrie No:: 970-925-1936 OWiiae("la):Victorian Square,LLC 'Er:hAil Adtlressof '13iiling _._._ i -P[ppc;fty,: 601 T.Xlyman Avenue Address.: 601 F.Hyman Avenue (suNed.OP Aspen,CO 81611 (0000.1s here) Aspen,CO 81611 �nP�c�ttonj. .: .1611 deistaiid.tk►atltie City hay adopted,via bi-tinen6.6i blo.;,, S2Nes bf 2EI11:,reuieW fees for Lar<d.Use.�appiiaai'tona and the:payment'dt it►ese.fees:rs a:copdition.precddent•fo dWiEhinihq:application comple nass: f undeFs4afad thatastheprropArly,ownerthat1'amriisporisible:forpayingallle'e&forthis:cigv lapi�iei. : 01 it For flat tees`aitd xef0 ref-fee's:I eigree to.,pajr th06iI6w'IAg feesIbr the iid'ihauth'ese :flat'i�ees are rain-rdfuhdabte. $ 650 flat fee-for- Parks $ . . . . ....,pt,fee for• Fbr:606sll cases onli: IK6 CO:and I unefers'tand thlit: abi of;'the sizfi,:natpre•op°sct�gd of 14e prbpo.eW roeot,it.is'riot: ossibie-�tihis�t�me:toknowthe;�'uN-extent�or;tptal;:cos�inuolved:in���bce�singthe�appl9c�fioz, I undc�rst'snci that tat dit'tonal,,Guts, oVer�and alibirQ'the.deposit riay-acoU.6. I odi jetand.- sod ag ep. thaf f is ltnpraoticbbf®f.4rCity,staf :to coii�pEt3te;.plQcessiit[d, ravt3uu; nq.�reseritati¢ti 6 i'$ icient:6formatioh`' o enable tedmly required'tindi' to:b.Fe made for;projpd carisideration,;ilrildss involces-ar ;0ald in'full' Z W 11J LU C= p,n The Ci -arid] undetma0 anrl_;agre6 that Ipy4ioa. mailed y.tN6:City o'.0�••abial"re.If�W� billing addri and not retnrfied;to t#te City shag he cortsid®red.py the Clays§ tieing raceM5 by tyre,l::adrge:to rbmfl.:payrr<i;ritwtthin 30 Q r--� days of pM n.634 rl of an'.�nvoice by.th pity for such'serViCea, LU O I hav6;t6ad- und®rsf6dd,:a"I;agrees to the La d, se:FteView Feb Polic 'inclUdiri •consequpnces:fornan menti I,agree to pUj ay tfte fdfiovuing inilial' Ciaposit arrrounts`fo�ltte sp�cified',Mours of:'striff time. ]undar'stnd.that payti>e1it of a doposit.does net Yertder On,ePAltcatiort dbrnplete''or:c4rnpliatit•w{tt;&pprbv'I sriteris;:lf_actuHi,,recorrled,cpSts U exceed the, initial dip©sit; ',.agree to pay-addifioPi:rl mot khly piflings to the.-..R to reimi�urse 'thr3.City fir the pibeessirig of my eppliaation`at iha.ho.urd ` {les'1,66" ft stated:. $ 4,550, tlepo:sit:fgr:.. .i�., ,:Hours ofCommunity".bevefopan®ht.Doparti•n�'ni.sfc�fC,:firht?. Aclifitional.tune _ above,the.depositamout►t will b®Filled af;$325.-0 1 hour:: $.265. , deposjtJbr...I hburs:ofEn'gineerirtg.Depasthl6nt 101fH6'' iddHio.naltiaiieaboyo.tkre.deposit .ampuntwill'.Ee billed'-3t•$265,per.hour.. City'df Aspen: Properfy Owner' Chris Beiition. Corrriiiunify bO.MoVment bire..ctor N ' opala Gat-Bet Victorian Square, 1t.C, rado limited]M bility company, GityUsq: Title'. l r o Corporation, Manager �.►� Ronald Garb ,Prey g6 ` ILE CIKI r 3 3�� M ® 0 oil THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application. Determination of Completeness Date: April 19, 2013 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0023.2013.ASLU — 601 E. Hyman, Final Commercial Design. The planner assigned to.this case is Sara Nadolny. ❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please.submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No.review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. I\ Your Land Use Application is complete: If there.are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, fifer6,Aan, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New SPA New PUD Yes No Subdivision, SPA, or PUD(creating more than 1 additional lot). GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. 273? 1 254 0 ' 0023 . 2013 , AS L-U _'.Pernlits ' File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help ►X ► 1`1A lump l 0 '© outing Status Fees Fee Summary Main Actions Attachments'Routing History Valuation 'Arch/Eng 'Custom Fields Sub Permits Parcels —11 rmit type asla Aspen Land Use Permit# 0023.2013 ASLU Address 1601 E HYMAN AVE I•. Apt/suite City ASPEN State FET-1 Zp 81612 Permit Information - Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Ap 0411212013 Project Status Pending Appr • escription APPLICATION FOR FINAL COMMERICAL DESIGN REVIEW-VICTORIA SQUARE Closed. • StuUMSM CMEN 925 2323 CA Running Dws F 0—_..F,xpires 04/0712014 • Last name' VICTORIAN SQUARE,LLC First name 418 E COOPER AVE 207 Phone O Address ASPEN CO 81611 J11111 .. - � Owner isapplicant? ❑Contractor is applicant? Last name VICTORIAN SQUARE.LLCFirst name 418 E COOPER AVE 207 a Phone I�Cust 129263 Address ASPFN C.091611 Lender . . _ �� .. Last name First name Phone ( ) Address i iglays the permit lender's address AspenGold5(server`angelas: 'loll Ck 00 4/ 5,r; D ' • 'a v � D • APR 1 1 2013 • FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF ASPEN • "601 East Hyman Avenue," a mixed-use commercial and residential COMMUNITYDEVELOPUENT • development featuring commercial and office space, and one (1) free-market • residential unit. • 10 April 2013 • • Applicant: Victorian Square, LLC • Location: 601 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado • • • • • • • • • • • VIEW LOOKING 80UTHEA8T • • An application for Final Commercial Design Review under the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic Design Objectives and Guidelines for the Commercial Character Area. Represented By: • STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESiNc landscape architecture.planning.resort design • 412 North Mill Street Aspen,Colorado 81611 t.970/925-2323 f.970/920-i628 info@scaplanning.com www.scap(anning.com • • • 1• TABLE OF CONTENTS • ■ Project Overview and Code Response r ■ Attachment 2 - Land Use Application Form ■ Attachment 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form ■ Attachment 4 - Vicinity Map Parcel Detail Information ■ Attachment 5 - Existing Conditions Survey ■ Attachment 6 - Letter of Authorization ■ Attachment 7 - Proof of Ownership ■ Attachment 8 - Architectural Plans & Renderings ■ Attachment 9 - Previous Approvals ■ Attachment 10 - Adjacent Property Owners ■ Attachment 11 - Pre-Application Conference Summary r • 601 East Hyman • Application for Final Commercial Design Review PROJECT OVERVIEW The Site • This application is submitted for final design review for a mixed-use development located on a • portion of the three Townsite lots located on the southeast corner of Hunter Street and Hyman Avenue in the Commercial (C-1) zone district of the City of Aspen, Colorado. The property is • located outside of the Commercial Core Historic District, the boundary of which is the western side of Hunter Street. The parcels do not fall within any delineated City of Aspen view planes and no variations are requested as a part of,the application. The proposed project would replace the existing commercial building with a mixture of retail, office, and residential uses housed in an architecturally stunning building. The redevelopment of existing building would complete the redevelopment of the Hyman Avenue corridor extending from the downtown core. This redevelopment will include the new Aspen Art Museum, the Muse Building, the Aspen Core Building, and the preservation and restoration of the Benton Building. • Previous Approvals Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval was granted for the proposed project by Resolution No. 19, Series 2012. Additionally, Growth Management and Subdivision Review for New Commercial and Free-market Residential Development approval were granted by Resolution No. 22, Series 2012. A prior condominium of the property was vacated, meaning that • no further subdivision review is required. Proposed Development The existing commercial building contains approximately 6,292 sq. ft. of net leasable space. The • proposed project includes a small increase in commercial net leasable space pushing the total proposed net leasable to 7,317 sq. ft. The new building will feature a 1,908 sq. ft. free-market • residential unit on the third floor. Generous deck space and the incorporation of green roof technology provide significant setbacks of the upper floors from the corner of Hunter and Hyman and at places along Hyman Avenue. The total proposed floor area to be located in the . building is 9,304 sq. ft. This amount of proposed floor area is considerably less than the 11,250 sq. • ft. allowable for this property in the C-1 zone district. Mitigation for additional development is proposed through the purchase of Affordable Housing Credits or off-site mitigation. Public amenity space was approved during Conceptual Review by the Planning & Zoning Commission • at 562.5 sq. ft. Both sidewalks located off of Hyman and Hunter will be improved with a consistent all6e of street trees. Other amenities such.as benches and landscaping will complete a pleasant pedestrian experience. Architecture This visually arresting but compatible approach employed in the design of the building will • ensure that the building will.be well received by the community and an appropriate addition to an already exciting block. The building is composed of three modules that approximate the widths of traditional townsite lots. Large windows, highly visible storefronts, use of visually • interesting materials, and areas of public amenity space,which will invite pedestrians to interact • with the architecture of the building, are incorporated into all three modules. Detailed features of the three modules include: The two story module located on the corner of Hunter and Hyman will feature a dynamic • and attractive storefront which will engage pedestrians walking down both Hunter and • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review . 10 April 2013 Page 1 Hyman. The two story corner element will also anchor the corner and represent an • important element to pedestrians passing from the other buildings on the block and other important pedestrian amenities such as Gondola Plaza to the south. • The three story element provides a strong street wall for the south side of Hyman Avenue. • A series of entrances off of Hyman Avenue, enhanced with benches and landscaping, will allow the building and pedestrians to flow down the block. The result will be the creation of a pedestrian environment which will lead pedestrians down the block to the • future Art Museum Building. The.three story module features an overhang which will conform to the dimensional limitations imposed during the Conceptual review. The overhang will frame the store front windows below and create a separation from the • ground floor from the upper floors. Finally, the overhang will provide an area for pedestrians to pause out of the elements. • The third module,which houses the main entrance for the second and third floor uses, • meets the neighboring structure, fostering the street wall effect that has been established in the neighboring structure. The third floor over the entry has been set back from the Hyman Avenue fagade, reducing the mass and scale of the building. A green roof has • been provided over the entry way. We look forward to working with staff and presenting this exceptional project to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page,2 Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines • Commercial Character Area. This area forms the immediate fringe of much of the Commercial Core Historic District. • DESIGN OBJECTIVES These are key design objectives for the Commercial Area. The City must find that any new work will help to meet • them: 1.Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District • Strengthening the definition of the street edge in a manner similar to the Commercial Core is desired.At the same time,the Commercial Area is a place where more variety in design is encouraged. Imitating historic styles is not an objective,but re-establishing a sense of a stronger fundamental framework will enhance the urban qualities of this area and is a priority. The facade on the proposed new building has received significant redesign from the • Conceptual Commercial Design Review. The redesigned building will enhance the sense of relatedness between the Commercial Core Historic District and other significant elements such as Gondola Plaza and the new Aspen Art Museum. Responding to staff's direction, the building will provide a strong definition of the street edge and will feature large display windows on.the ground level that will draw pedestrian interest along both the Hyman Avenue and Hunter Street corridors. • 2.Maintain a retail orientation. Greater retail presence at the street edge should be achieved to ensure an enhanced street vitality and an enriched • and more urban definition of the commercial street frontage. In addition to providing basement commercial space, the proposed project,while not ` required to provide ground floor retail, anticipates providing additional retail space on the ground floor. This space will be accessible from both Hyman Avenue and Hunter Street. • 3.Promote creative,contemporary design. • Designs should seek creative new solutions that convey the community's continuing interest in exploring innovations. At the same time,the fundamental principles of traditional,design must be respected. This means that each project should strike a balance in the design variables that are presented in the following pages. . The proposed design of the building,which has incorporated many of the suggestions voiced by staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission during the Conceptual review, ' continues to utilize a contemporary and innovative approach which features artistic and • natural forms that will complement other new development on this block. While highly creative and being a building "of its time," the proposed building is respectful of traditional development within the area and will utilize materials that are compatible with the traditional building materials used in the City. The building will be sited orthogonally on the site, again in compliance with traditional development patterns in the central core. • 4.Encourage a well-defined street wall. • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 3 The intent is to more clearly establish a strongly defined street wall,but with some greater variety than in the Commercial Core Historic District since the historic building edge is not as defined. A stronger street fafade • definition should be achieved while at the same time recognizing the value of public dining and landscaped • space. The proposed design has incorporated many of the comments provided by staff and the . Planning and Zoning Commission, particularly with regards to providing a well-defined street wall. The Applicants feel that the strong facade along Hyman Avenue which features an overhang, coupled with the useful and interesting public amenity spaces, • create a memorable addition to the corner of Hunter and Hyman. Variations in height, use of significant building elements, and attractive building materials bolster the vitality of an exciting streetscape in the making. The urban streetscape will be improved by the . addition of street trees and other landscaping embellishments. S.Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. • It is important that a range and variation in building height and scale in the Commercial Area be recognized in future development Larger buildings should be varied in height and reflect original lot widths. The proposed building utilizes two and three-story elements which are varied to reflect original lot widths. The two-story element immediately adjacent to the corner of Hunter and Hyman and the three-story element on Hyman provide variation from the orientation . of the other buildings located on this block which features the Aspen Art Museum's uniform building height and the Muse Building's three stories with a significant third floor setback. 6.Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. Providing space in • association with individual buildings remains important,but should be balanced with much greater building • streetpresence and corner definition. The pedestrian amenity space responds to the suggestions provided by staff and the • Planning and Zoning Commission from the Conceptual Commercial Design Review process. The proposed public amenity space will ensure that a significant street presence and corner definition is maintained. 7.Promote variety in the street level experience. Display cases, architectural details and landscaping are among • the design elements that should be used. Display windows, architectural details which incorporate areas of landscaping and • benches, and interesting materials have been incorporated into the design to promote variety in the street level experience. Pavement variation will contribute to the pedestrian experience. FINAL REVIEW DESIGN GUIDELINES • The following design guidelines shall apply at the final review stage: • 1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width (30 ft)as expressed by two or more of the following: -Variation in height at internal lot lines • Variation in the plane of the front facade •Street facade composition • Variation in architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the building module • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 4 • Traditional lot widths are expressed by the width of the three modules of the building. The provision of front fagade elements which "bump out," the use of difference materials and architectural detailing that emphasize building modules, and significant setbacks of • upper floors also reinforce the perception that the building approximates traditional lot widths. • 1.30 The detailed design of the building fagade should reflect the traditional scale and rhythm of the block This should be achieved using all of the following: • The fenestration grouping •The modeling of the fagade •The design framework for the first floor storefront . • Variation in architectural detail and/or the palette of fagade materials i The detailed design elements and materials contained in the proposed building facade provide a unique compliment to the scale and rhythm of the existing buildings located on the block. The proposed fenestration aligns with neighboring properties' fenestration, utilizing similar or compatible shapes, and detailed design elements. The repetition of various facade elements and materials in the proposed building support a sense of • rhythm on the street and creates a design framework for the first floor storefronts. . 1.31 A building should reflect the architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the street fagade. The following should be addressed: • • The design and definition of the traditionally tall first floor • • The vertical proportions of the upper level fenestration pattern and ratio of solid wall to window area. The first floor of the proposed building emphasizes the traditionally tall first floor by making the storefront windows the focus of the fagade. The tall storefront windows, which will provide exceptional interest to pedestrians, occupy the majority of the first level. Complementing the glazing on the first level, the second and third story windows react • to the first story proportions while complimenting neighboring buildings ratio of solid wall to window area. Considered as an ensemble, the four new buildings in the immediate vicinity (Aspen Art Museum, the Muse Building, the proposed Victorian Square, and the • Aspen Core Building) will create a very exciting block which exemplifies the desire in Aspen for architecture to be "of its time" with an eye to our past. 1.32 A building should reflect the three dimensional characteristics of the street fafade in the strength and depth of modeling,fenestration and architectural detail. Employing an interesting interplay of volume and detailing, the three dimensional characteristics of the street facade will engage pedestrians and anchor the Hunter/Hyman intersection. By pulling certain elements out towards the street and pushing other elements back to meet neighboring fagades, the proposed building initiates the block rhythm which will culminate with the Art Museum. 1.33 Any new building shall be designed to maintain a minimum of 9 feet from floor to ceiling on all floors. The proposed building will have floor to ceiling heights of 13 feet on the first floor, and 11 • feet on the second and third floors. 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upper floors. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 5 •The first floor should be the tallest floor to floor height in the building. • The first floor of the primary fagade should be predominantly transparent glass. • Upper floors should be perceived as being more opaque than the street level. Upper story windows • should have a vertical emphasis. •Highly reflective or darkly tinted glass is inappropriate. •Express the traditional distinction in floor heights between street levels and upper levels through . detailing,materials and fenestration. The presence of a belt course is an important feature in this relationship. The first floor of the proposed building, with a 13 foot floor to ceiling height,will be the tallest floor in the building. The second and third stories have 11 foot floor to ceiling heights. The dominant feature of the first floor will be the nearly uninterrupted glass fagade which will provide unimpeded views into the commercial spaces: The upper story windows, while having a very strong vertical emphasis, and are smaller and will show less of the interior space on the second floors. By doing this, the first story of windows will receive the most attention. Highly reflective glass and darkly tinted glass will not be used in the building. By implementing an overhang over the first story on the main fagade module, a strong distinction is created between the street level and the upper • levels of the building. Landscape elements on the street level will further cause a pedestrian's attention to be drawn to the street level. • 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level retail frontage. • This,should be 13-15 ft in floor to floor height on the first floor. •The minimum required first floor height must be maintained for at least the first 50 foot depth of the lot,and may only be dropped to a lower height beyond that point for areas that are devoted to storage, circulation, offices,restaurant kitchens,alley commercial spaces,or similar secondary uses. The proposed building features a 13 foot floor to ceiling height the entire depth of the lot. • 1.36 Minimize.the appearance of a tall third floor • Where a third floor's floor to ceiling height is in excess of 12 ft,it should be set back a minimum of 15 ft from the street fagade to reduce the apparent height • •Increase the parapet height to screen the visual impact of a tall top floor. • The design of a setback third floor shall be simpler inform,more subdued in modeling,detail and color than the primary fagade. The third story floor height will be 11 feet, less than the threshold set by this guideline to require a setback. The proposed building features modules of two and three stories. As , • seen from the Hunter Street facade, the third story will not be visible due to the very significant setback of the third story from Hunter Street. On the Hyman Avenue fagade, only the middle of three modules will contain a third story that extends to the Hyman • Avenue facade. The module adjacent to the neighboring three story building employs a . generous setback to the third story. . 1.37 The first floor fagade should be designed to concentrate interest at the street level, using the highest quality of design,detailing and materials. • •A strong and distinctively designed retail framework for the first floor of the building. • •An entryway designed to use the full height of the storefront •A distinct change in the palette of materials used for the first floor design framework • •The depth and strength of the modeling of elements and details. • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 6 The first floor facade is primarily made up of windows. Unique detailing at entry points provides visual interest and directs pedestrians to the commercial entrances. Complimentary landscape areas and well as benches,which are located under the overhang, will allow pedestrians to pause in front of the retail windows. The overhang provides a very strong ordering element,setting off the first floor facade. • 1.38 The retail entrance should be at the sidewalk level. •All entrances shall be ADA compliant. •On sloping sites the retail frontage should be as close to a level entrance as possible. All entrances to the commercial spaces are located immediately adjacent to the sidewalk and all entrances will be fully ADA compliant. The subject site does not slope • and all entrances will be level with the sidewalk. 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures. •An airlock entry that projects forward of the primaryfaVade at the sidewalk edge is inappropriate. •Adding temporary entries during the winter season detracts from the character of the historic district. • Using a temporary vinyl or fabric "airlock"to provide protection from winter weather is not permitted. No airlocks project forward of the primary facade of the building. A recessed airlock is provided for the midblock entrance on Hyman Avenue, which will provide access to all • elements of the building. Airlocks on the commercial entrances on the first floor space are not appropriate, as access to the commercial space should be unimpeded. 1.40 Window area along the first floor shall be a minimum of 60%of exterior street faVade area when facing principal street(s). . Window area along the first floor will be more than 60%of the exterior street facade when facing Hyman Avenue, the principal street fapade. • 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to maintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail frontage. . The proposed building will feature large windows which will provide direct views into the commercial spaces beyond. The large windows ensure that commercial spaces will o provide interest to pedestrians. 1.42 Design of the first floor storefront should include particular attention to the following: •The basic elements and proportions of storefront design •Depth and strength of modeling • The palette of materials and finishes used in both the structural framework and the storefront window • The concentration of architectural detail to ensure a rich visual experience •The complementary use of signage and lettering to enhance the retail and downtown character • •The use of lighting to accentuate visual presence The predominantly glazed first floor commercial storefronts are the focal point of the building. The overhanging second floor on the center module frames the commercial spaces and creates an inviting environment for pedestrians. Landscape treatments and varying materials cause the commercial spaces to become the focus of the facade. Signage and lettering employed will be compatible to the design of the building and compatible with downtown character. Site lighting, which will comply with appropriate lighting standards,will be utilized to accentuate the visual presence of the building. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 7 • 1.43 Retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the street • frontage,adjusted for the scale of the space. •It should be designed with a similar attention to architectural articulation,detail and materials. •These should have a richness of detail that is inviting to users. • No retail frontage is proposed to face side courts or rear alleys. 1.44 A larger building should reflect the traditional lot width in the form and variation of its roof. This should be achieved through the following: •A set back of the top floor from,the front fagade • •Reflect the traditional lot width in the roof plane By utilizing modules, the proposed building will not appear to be one large building but rather three buildings immediately adjacent to each other as was common in the Victorian period. The width of the modules is very similar to traditional lot widths. Moreover, one of the modules will be two-story while the other module will be predominantly three stories, further breaking the mass of the building up and causing the building to appear to mimic traditional lot widths. • 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building. •Group and screen mechanical units from view. •Locate mechanical equipment to the rear of the roof area. •Position,articulate and design rooftop enclosures or structures to reflect the modulation and character . of the building. • Use materials which complement the design of the building favades. •Design roof garden areas to be unobtrusive from the street •Use 'green roof design best practice,where feasible. The roofscape, which features many instances of green roofs, has been designed with the same design attention as the other elevations of the building. The majority of mechanical equipment will be located in the basement with only minimal elements, • such as the required elevator overrun, located on the roof. 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed. • • The palette of materials should be specified,including samples of materials as required. High quality, durable materials have been employed. The architectural plans call out • the various materials and samples are available for review. • 1.47 Building materials should have these features: •Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally •Reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance visual interest of the facade • •Convey a human scale • •Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen's climate . The highly attractive materials employed convey a subtlety which will be complimentary to the surrounding block. The materials mimic other materials which have been traditionally been used in the City and have been employed in such a way so as to convey visual interest to pedestrians. The materials also are of an appropriate scale for • pedestrians which will not over power the interesting 'interplay of volumes being explored, 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 8 1.48 A building or additions should reflect the quality and variation in materials seen traditionally. The proposed building reflects the quality and variation in materials seen traditionally but • also is a building of its time and uses modern materials and techniques of installation. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are used they shall be: •High quality in durability and finish •Detailed to convey a human scale • •Compatible with a traditional masonrypalette The modern aesthetic of the building will be supported by high quality materials chosen • for their durability. The materials are detailed to convey a strong human scale. The brick • lap siding, wood finishes, and laminate panels, are compatible features to the traditional material palette found throughout the City. 1.50 Materials used for third floor accommodation set back from the street fagade(s)should be more subdued than the primaryfagades. The setbacks,while not required as the upper floors are 1 1 feet floor to ceiling, are very significant so that upper level elements will not be visible from street level. The modern • aesthetic of the building employs an already subdued material palette which will be continued in the third floor facade. • 1.51 Paving and landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building and area. • Paving and landscape features compliment and reinforce the elements of the proposed building and will also be compatible with neighboring structures. • 601 East Hyman Avenue • Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 9 Land Use Code Sections • CHAPTER 26.412 COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW Sec.26.412.050.Review criteria. An application for commercial design review may be approved,approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: • A. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards,or any deviation from the standards provides a more appealingpattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the standards Compliance with Section 26.412.070,Suggested design elements,is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the standards. • The proposed project complies with the requirements of Section 26.412.60 and no deviations are sought from the commercial design standards. To the.extent possible, the proposed project will follow the general guidelines suggest by the City as contained in • Sec. 26.412.070: Suggested Design Elements. w B.For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use,the proposed development • meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards,to the greatest extent practical. Changes to the faVade of the building may be required to comply with this Section. The proposed project contemplates the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a new mixed-use building,which will include commercial and free market residential. No elements of the existing building will be retained and the exterior design of the proposed building will be significantly different from the existing structure. • C. The application shall comply with the guidelines within the Commercial,Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines as determined by the appropriate Commission. The guidelines set forth design review . criteria,standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The City shall determine when a proposal is in compliance with the criteria,standards and guidelines. Although these criteria,standards and guidelines are relatively comprehensive,there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be identified. In such a case,the City must determine • that the intent of the guideline is still met, albeit through alternative means. The proposed project is submitted for Commercial Design Review by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The proposed project complies with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines and specifically the "Commercial • Character Area" Chapter contained therein. Sec.26.412.060. Commercial design standards. • The following design standards,in addition to the commercial,lodging and historic district design objectives and guidelines,shall apply to commercial,lodging and mixed-use development. • A.Public amenity space. Creative,well-designed public places and settings contribute to an attractive,exciting and vital downtown retail district and a pleasant pedestrian shopping and entertainment atmosphere. Public amenity can take the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights-of-way or private property within commercial areas. 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 10 db r S Existing public amenity space consists of approximately 595 sq. ft. The proposed project provides 532.5 sq. ft. (12.5%of lot area) of public amenity space. This amount of public amenity space conforms to the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 19, Series 2012 which approved Conceptual Commercial Design. • On parcels required to provide public amenity,pursuant to Section 26.575.030,Public amenity,the following standards shall apply to the provision of such amenity. Acceptance of the method or combination of methods of • providing the public amenity shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission,as applicable,according to the procedures herein and according to the following standards.- 1. tandards.I. The dimensions of any proposed on-site public amenity sufficiently allow for a variety of uses and activities to occur,considering any expected tenant and future potential tenants and uses. The proposed on-site public amenity space will provide a landscaped pedestrian • amenity that supports the continuity of the pedestrian corridor for the commercial core to the new Art Museum. Benches, areas of landscaping, and a consistent allee of street trees will engage pedestrians and provide an area for casual gatherings. 2. The public amenity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this characteristic,public seating, outdoor restaurant seating or similar active uses,shade trees,solar access,view orientation and simple at-grade • relationships with adjacent rights-of-way are encouraged. The proposed public amenity space will contribute to an active street vitality. The public • amenity space includes benches, areas of landscaping and a consistent allee of street trees. Solar access, view orientation, and simple at-grade relationships with the adjacent rights-of-way have been utilized to the maximum extent possible. • 3. The public amenity and the design and operating characteristics of adjacent structures,rights-of-way and uses econtribute to an inviting pedestrian environment The proposed public amenity space, featuring benches, areas of landscaping, and a consistent allee of street trees, incorporates the design and operating characteristics of the adjacent structures. The two story module on the corner will provide a pedestrian scaled element that pedestrian will be drawn to and which will serve as an entrance element to the block containing the Aspen Art Museum. • 4. The proposed amenity does not duplicate existing pedestrian space created by malls,sidewalks or adjacent property,or such duplication does not detract from the pedestrian environment The public amenity space will enhance the relationship between the public sidewalk and the proposed building, providing pedestrians a one-of-a-kind opportunity to interact with • the volumes of the building. 5.Any variation to the design and operational standards for public amenity,Subsection 26.575.030.F., promotes • the purpose of the public amenity requirements. The proposed project provides 532.5 sq. ft. (12.5% of lot area) of public amenity space. • This amount of public amenity space conforms to the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 19, Series 2012 which approved Conceptual Commercial Design. The slight reduction of public amenity space required was approved at Conceptual Review 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 11 as the space below the overhanging section of facade were determined to be unique to Aspen and were elements the Commission members felt contributed to the pedestrian vitality of the City. • B. Utility,delivery and trash service provision. When the necessary logistical elements of a commercial building are well designed,the building can better contribute to the overall success of the district Poor logistics of one(1) building can detract from the quality of surrounding properties. Efficient delivery and trash areas are important • to the function of alleyways. The following standards shall apply: • 1.A utility,trash and recycle service area shall be accommodated along the alley meeting the minimum standards established by Section 26.575.060, Utility/trash recycle service areas, unless otherwise established according to said Section.. The project does not have alley access in which utility, trash, and recycling service areas can be accommodated. A plan for the utility, trash, and recycling service area has • been provided and comments returned by the Environmental Health Department for the City of Aspen. Generally, Environmental Health has said the trash area layout is "good" and the "space looks useable." The utility, trash, and recycling service areas will be located off of Hunter Street in a similar area as the existing building. 2.All utility service pedestals shall be located on private property and along the alley. Easements shall allow for service provider access. Encroachments into the alleyway shall be minimized to the extentpractical and should only be necessary when existing site conditions,such as an historic resource, dictate such encroachment All • encroachments shall be properly licensed. The proposed project does not have alley frontage. An existing electrical service transformer will be retained on the property in approximately its present location for which an easement currently exists. Any additional utility service pedestals will be located on private property. No encroachments are proposed as part of this application. • 3.Delivery service areas shall be incorporated along the alley. Any truck loading facility shall be an integral . component of the building. Shared facilities are highly encouraged. The proposed project does not have alley access and will not have a truck loading facility,with the exception of the trash and recycling facility. • 4.Mechanical exhaust,including parking garage ventilation,shall be vented through the roof. The exhaust equipment shall be located as far away from the street as practical, Any mechanical exhaust will be vented through the roof and located as far away from the street as practical. The proposed project will not include a garage. 5.Mechanical ventilation equipment and ducting shall be accommodated internally within the building and/or located on the roof,minimized to the extent practical and recessed behind a parapet wall or other screening • device such that it shall not be visible from a public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. New buildings shall reserve adequate space for future ventilation and ducting needs. Mechanical ventilation equipment and ducting will be accommodated internally within the building and located on the roof, will-be minimized to the extent practical, and • recessed behind a parapet wall or other screening device such that it shall not be visible • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 12 from a public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. The proposed project will reserve adequate space for future ventilation and ducting needs. • Sec.26.412.070. Suggested design elements. • The following guidelines are building practices suggested by the City,but are not mandatory. In many circumstances,compliance with these practices may not produce the most desired development, and project • designers should use their best judgment; A.Signage. Signage should be integrated with the building to the extent possible. Integrated signage areas already meeting the City's requirements for size,etc.,may minimize new tenant signage compliance issues. • Common tenant listing areas also serves a public way-finding function,especially for office uses. Signs should not block design details of the building on which they are placed. Compliance with the City's sign code is mandatory. No signage is proposed at this time. Future signage will be integrated into the building in areas provide through the facade design. Tenant listing areas will be included for • second floor uses. Signs will not block details of the building and will conform to the requirements of the City sign code. B.Display windows. Display windows provide pedestrian interest and can contribute to the success of the retail space. Providing windows that reveal inside activity of the store can provide this pedestrian interest • A significant amount of display windows will be provided on the ground level for ground- floor tenant uses in the proposed project. • C Lighting. Well-lit(meaning quality,not quantity)display windows along the first floor create pedestrian interest after business hours. Dynamic lighting methods designed to catch attention can cheapen the quality of • the downtown retail environment Illuminating certain important building elements can provide an interesting effect Significant light trespass should be avoided. Illuminating the entire building should be avoided. Compliance with the City's Outdoor lighting code,Section 26.575.150 of this Title,is mandatory. • Certain important building elements of the proposed project may be illuminated to provide an interesting effect. Light trespass will be avoided. The proposed project will comply with the City's Outdoor Lighting Code. A detailed lighting plan has been • provided with this Final Commercial Design Review. • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 13 Chapter 26.610 Impact Fees 26.610.020.Applicability. • Unless expressly exempted,the Park Development impact fee and the Transportation Demand Management (TDM)/Air Quality impact fee shall be assessed upon all development within the City which contains residential floor area or net leasable commercial space. f The Applicant commits to pay any and all impact fees associated with the new residential floor area and net leasable floor area. Impact fees are provisionally calculated as follows: Park Development: o Residential- 1,908 sq. ft. x$5.45.=$10,338.60 • o Commercial - 1,025 sq. ft.x$4.10 = $4,202.50 • • TDM/Air Quality: o Residential- 1,908 sq. ft. x$.61 = $1,163.88 o Commercial- 1,025 sq. ft.x$.46 = $471.50 Chapter 26.620 School Land Dedication 26.620.020.Applicability. Unless expressly exempted,the school land dedication standard shall be assessed upon all development within the City which contains residential dwelling units. The Applicant commits to paying the School Land Dedication fees associated with the new residential dwelling unit. • The School Land dedication fee is provisionally calculated as follows: • Floor Area Students Generated 1,908 sq. ft. (first 1,200 sq. ft. z .000064) .077 (next 708 sq. ft. x .000404) .286 Total Student Generation .363 Land Dedication Calculation 896 sq. ft. x .363= 325 sq. ft. Cash-In-Lieu $1,509,450.00/4,500 sq. ft. x 325 sq. ft. x .33 =$35,975.22 • 601 EastHyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 14 Commercial (C-1) Zone District 26.710.150. Commercial(C-1). A.Purpose. The purpose of the Commercial(C-1)Zone District is to provide for the establishment of mixed-use buildings with commercial uses on the ground floor and opportunities for affordable and free-market residential density. A transition between the commercial core and surrounding residential neighborhoods has been implemented through a slight reduction in allowable floor area as compared to the commercial core,the ability to occupy the ground floor with offices,and a separate chapter in the commercial design guidelines. The project represents a mixed-use building with commercial on the first and second floors and free-market residential on the third floor. The project contains less floor area than what would be allowable in the C-1 and is in compliance with the "Commercial • Character Area" chapter of the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. • R Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted as of right in the Commercial(C-1)Zone District. 1. Uses allowed on upper floors:Lodging,affordable multi family housing,free-market multi family housing and home occupations. The project contains free-market multi-family housing on the third floor. • Z Uses allowed on all building levels:Retail and restaurant uses,neighborhood commercial uses, service uses,office uses,arts,cultural and civic uses,public uses,recreational uses,academic uses,child • care center,bed and breakfast,accessory uses and structures,uses and building elements necessary and incidental to uses on other floors,including parking accessory to a permitted use,storage accessory to a permitted use,farmers'market,provided that a vending agreement is obtained pursuant to Section 15.04.350(b).Parking shall not be allowed as the sole use of the ground floor. The project contains commercial and office uses on the basement, first, and • second floors. C. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the Commercial(C-1)Zone District, subject to the standards and procedures established in Chapter 26.425: 1.Lodging,affordable multi family housing,free-market multi family housing or home occupations on • the ground floor. 2. Commercial parking facility,pursuant to Section 26.515. 3. For historic landmark properties:Detached residential dwelling, two(2)detached residential dwellings and duplex dwelling. No conditional uses of the Commercial (C-1) zone district are contemplated in the proposed project. D.Dimensional requirements. The following dimensional requirements shall apply to all permitted and conditional uses in the Commercial(C-1)Zone District: • 1.Minimum Gross Lot Area (square feet): a.Detached residential dwelling,two (2)detached residential dwellings,duplex dwelling and • bed and breakfast.3,000. b.All other uses:No requirement. • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 15 • The project will contain only commercial, office and free-market, multi- family uses. The minimum gross lot area requirement does not apply. • 2.Minimum Net Lot Area per dwelling unit(square feet): a.Detached residential dwelling,two(2)detached residential dwellings,duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast:Same as R-6 Zone District. • b.All other uses:No requirement. The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family • uses. The minimum net lot area per dwelling unit requirement does not apply. . 3.Minimum lot width (feet): a.Detached residential dwelling,two(2)detached residential dwellings,duplex dwelling and • bed and breakfast.Same as R-6 Zone District. • b.All other uses:No requirement. The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family • uses. The minimum lot width requirement does not apply. • 4.Minimum frontyard setback(feet): a.Detached residential dwelling,two (2) detached residential dwellings,duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast:Same as R-6 Zone District. • b.All other uses:No requirement. The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family • uses. The minimum front yard setback requirement does not apply. 5.Minimum side yard setback(feet): • a.Detached residential dwelling,two (2) detached residential dwellings,duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast.Same as R-6 Zone District. • b.All other uses:No requirement The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family uses. The minimum side yard setback requirement does not apply. • 6.Minimum rear yard setback(feet): • a.Detached residential dwelling,two(2)detached residential dwellings,duplex dwelling.and bed and breakfast.Same as R-6 Zone District. b.All other uses:No requirement • The project contains only commercial, office and free-market, multi-family uses. The minimum rear yard setback requirement does not apply. • 7.Minimum utility/trashlrecycle area:Pursuant to Section 26.575.060. • The property does not have alley access. Pursuant to Sec. 26.575.060, "Utility/trash/recycle service areas," for properties that do not have alley access, the minimum utility/trash/recycle area requirement does not apply. A utility/trash/recycle area has been provided on the southwest corner of the • building, with access onto Hunter Street. This is the same as the current location • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 16 for this facility in the existing building. The utility/trash/recycle area has been • reviewed by Environmental Health and found to be "useable." . 8.Maximum height. a.Detached residential dwelling,two (2)detached residential dwellings,duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast.Same as R-6 Zone District. • b.All other uses:twenty-eight(28)feet for two-story elements of a building. Thirty-six(36)feet for three-story elements of a building,which may be increased to forty(40)feet through commercial design review. See Chapter 26.412. The proposed project will contain only commercial, office and free- market, multi-family uses. The maximum proposed height of the building • will be thirty-six (36) feet. 9.Minimum distance between buildings on the lot(feet): • a.Detached residential dwelling,two (2)detached residential dwellings,duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast.Same as R-6 Zone District. b.All other uses:No requirement. The proposed project will contain only commercial, office and free- market, multi-family uses. The minimum distance between buildings on • the lot requirement does not apply. • 10.Public amenity space:Pursuant to Section 26.575.030. Existing public amenity space consists of approximately 595 sq. ft. The proposed • project provides 532.5 sq. ft. (12.5%of lot area) of public amenity space. This • amount of public amenity space conforms to the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 19,Series 2012 which approved Conceptual Commercial Design. 11. Floor area ratio (FAR): The following FAR schedule applies to uses cumulatively up to a total maximum FAR of 2.5:1. Achieving the maximum floor area ratio is subject to compliance with applicable design standards,view plane requirements,public amenity requirements and other dimensional standards. Accordingly,the maximum FAR is not an entitlement and is not achievable in . all situations. Maximum cumulative floor area for the property is 11,250 sq. ft. or a ratio 2.50:1. • The proposed cumulative floor area for the project will be 2.07:1 or 9,304 sq. ft. a. Commercial uses:1.5:1. Maximum commercial floor area for the property is 6,750 sq. ft. or a ratio of 1.5:1. The proposed commercial floor area for the project will be 1.29:1 • or 5,822 sq. ft. b.Arts,cultural and civic uses,public uses,recreational uses,academic uses,child care center • and similar uses:2.5:1. No arts, cultural and civic, public uses, recreational uses, academic uses, • child care center and similar uses are contemplated to be provided in the proposed project. • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 17 • c.Affordable multi family housing.No limitation. • No affordable multi-family housing is contemplated to be provided in the • proposed project. Affordable housing for the new residential and expanded commercial will be provided through the purchase of • affordable housing credits. d.Lodging. .5:1, which may be increased to 1.5:1 if the individual lodge units on the parcel • average five hundred(500)net livable square feet or less, which may be comprised of lock-off • units. • No lodging is contemplated to be provided in the proposed project. e. Free-market multi family housing:.5:1,which may be increased to.75:1 if affordable • housing equal to one hundred percent(100%)of the free-market residential floor area is developed on the same parcel. • Maximum free-market residential floor area for the property is 2,250 sq. ft. or a ratio of 0.50:1. One (1) 1,908 sq. ft. free-market residential unit is proposed. Along with circulation and other non-unit space, the • residential floor area ratio will be 0.50:1 or 2,250 sq. ft. f.Detached residential dwellings, duplex dwellings and bed and breakfast(as the sole use of parcel and not cumulative with other uses):Eighty percent(80%)of allowable floor area of a same-sized lot located in the R-6 Zone District (See R-6 Zone District) Extinguishment of • historic TDRs shall not permit additional FAR for single-family or duplex development No detached residential dwellings, duplex dwellings and bed and breakfast (as the sole use of parcel and not cumulative with other uses) • are contemplated to be provided in the proposed project. . 12.Maximum multi family residential dwelling unit size(square feet):2,000 square feet of net livable • area. . The one (1) proposed multi-family residential dwelling unit will be 1,801 sq. ft. net • livable. • a. The property owner may increase individual multi family unit size by extinguishing historic • transferable development right certificates("certificate"or "certificates"),subject to the following: 1. The transfer ratio is five hundred(500)square feet of net.livable area for each certificate that is purchased. 2. The additional square footage accrued may be applied to multiple units. However, • the maximum individual unit size attainable by transferring development rights is two thousand five hundred(2,500)square feet of net livable area ('tie.,no more than five • hundred[500]additional square feet may be applied per unit). • 3. This incentive applies only to individual unit size. Transferring development rights does not allow an increase in the FAR of the lot • No TDRs are contemplated to be extinguished in connection with the proposed project. • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 18 • 13.Maximum lodge unit size(square feet):1,500. When units are comprised of lockoff units,this maximum shall apply to the largest possible combination of units. • No lodge units are contemplated to be provided in connection with the proposed project. • 14. CommerciaUresidential ratio: The total lodging and free-market residential net livable area shall be no greater than the total above grade floor area associated with the uses described in Subparagraphs • 26.710.150.D.Il.a. and b. combined on the same parcel. The total free-market residential net livable areas will not be greater than the total • above-grade floor area associated with the commercial uses contemplated to be provided in the proposed project. Total free-market residential net livable is proposed to be 1,801 sq. ft. Total commercial floor area net leasable will be 5,487 • sq.ft. This is a ratio of 3.05 commercial to residential floor area. • 601 East Hyman Avenue Application for Final Commercial Design Review 10 April 2013 Page 19 • M23'2013 -As*kEIVED • • ATTACHMENT 2—LAND USE APPLICATION APR 11 2013 • PROJECT: Name: Victorian Square Final Commercial Design ReviewCi M Location: 601 E. Hyman Ave. (Indicate street address,lot&block number, legal description where appropriate) • Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) 273718225801, 273718225027, 273718225028, 273718225029, 273718225030, 273718225031, 273718225032, 273718225033, APPLICANT: Name: Victorian Square, LLC • Address: c/o Ronald Garfield, Esq., Garfield & Hecht, PC, 601 East Hyman Avenue,Aspen, CO 81611 • Phone#: 970-925-1936 • REPRESENTATIVE: • Name: Stan Clauson,AICP,ASLA, Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. • Address. 412 N. Mill Street,Aspen, CO 81611 • Phone#: 970-925-2323 • TYPE OF APPLICATION:(please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use • ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑. Text/Map Amendment © Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA • ❑ ESA—8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane • ❑X Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ • Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: • ❑ Conditional Use • ExiSTING CONDITIONS: (description tion of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc.) • The existing Victorian Square building currently contains office space exclusively. The subject parcel is located on half of . three lots and consists of 4,500 sq.ft. The parcel has no alley access. • • PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications.etc.) The• applicant seeks to redevelop the parcel with a mixed use building. Commercial space will occupy the basement,first, and second story and free-market residential will occupy the third story. • Have You attached the following? FEES Dt1E:$ 5,465 ❑X Pre-Application Conference Summary ❑X Attachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement • ❑X Response to Attachment 0,.Dimensional Requirements Form 0 Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards • Q 3-D Model for large project • All plans that are larger than 8.5"X I l"must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. • • • • • ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Victorian Square Condominums • Applicant: Victorian Square, LLC Location: 601 E. Hyman Avenue • Zone.DiStriCt' Commercial (C-1) Lot Size: 4,500 sq.ft. • Lot Area: 4,500 sq.ft. • (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may bereduced for areas within the high water mark,easernents,and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 5,209 sq. ft. Proposed. 7,317 sq.ft. Number of residential units: Existing: 0 Proposed- 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing 0Proposed• 3 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 6,292 sq.ft.Alloivable: 11,250 sq. ft.Proposed. 9,304 sq.ft. Principal bldg. height: Existing: 28' Allowable: 40' Proposed: 36' Access. bldg, height: Existing: Allovvcible: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: 0 Required. 1 Proposed. 0 % Site coverage: Existifzg: 69% Required: n/a Proposed: 88% • % Open Space: E.xistin 595 s ft. Req yired: 595 sq.ft. Proposed. 562.5 sq.ft. � � p g��� l; Front Setback: Existing: 1'-5' Required: n/a Proposed• . Rear Setback: Existing: 5' Required: n/a Proposed: Combined F/R.: Existing: 6'-10' Required: . n/a Proposed: • Side Setback: Existing: East: 5' Required n/a Proposed: Side Setback: Existing.• West:10' Rewired: n/a Proposed Combined Sides: Existing: 15' Required: n/a Proposed Distance Between Exis1'ing Required n/a Proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: None. Variations requested: None requested. ►1• Attachment 4 Lelpnd I_I Citlfa A Towrn i 106. 112, Addrfaas d' r..= x 110+ 1 • Trails $�13v j rr .uhf » �_ _ LW • �-J PLS TR - PLS TR_SEC r , • M. Major Reade / l r1• • ~ Roads 700 Eagif and OarMld CO r ,11711Roads 7 _ - 725 f Edge at Pavement Aspen Edge of Pav,Mfnt PMklns L NS 3d`'110 d. ^/ Rivers RSrfanw : ,,14 t . Mines Subdiviaiom • • • � • '120,7* O suuera r * }rC� _ 710, a. 714 Condos ;� - 716. . Pamela 601•._ • CIS 72WDa - • O 7 Lakes i Polls 0 uJ Federal Lands WA RATla CO r7 71%5., LIMA 710 - 610• 16, :'- ,- ~2107,r 608 - 2737rT10S,R84W_ i 70507 , • ,: .1 , _ 708 710 . r 625 2 637, Lw74f"T- tr • _ AaPN AAM C ' 816 • ` ,.---.� • _ _ `` .1300 7C}7a 1► 715 y • 00, 801 7 . � - -�• 310 , ` __ '�.,,, . 1 14r SS5. AZ x 7r50 i f • mit a02 ' ,,,�,,� —+.7ds dQBT _ 605 1617, Bell Mounlarn l • 411W2 ' - _ F r � 610,, t 711 614 COY PAW PLl d 8U5 3 617 t` 426 _ 426,-, �r $21 T 430 b3t� 6 Subject Parcel 01 East Hyman Application for Final Commercial Design Review • Pae 1 of 2 • Parcel Detail g • • Pitkin County Assessor • Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk&Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search • Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary • • Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail . Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs • Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 00171 R020234 273718225801 31.653 • • • Primary Owner Name and Address • • VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC • COMMON AREA • Additional Owner Detail • Legal Description • Subdivision: VICTORIANSQUARE DESC: COMMON AREA Location • Physical Address: 11601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN • Subdivision: IVICTORIAN SQUARE • Land Acres: • Land Sq Ft: I 0 2011 Property Value Summary • Actual Value Assessed Value . Land: 0F 0 • Improvements: Total: IF 0 F0 • • • http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=RO20234 10-Apr-12 • • Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 • I Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail . Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential IF Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 0 . Buildings: I No Building Records Found • Top of Page . Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright C 2003 -2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. . Database&Web Design by Good Turns Software. • http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccoiintNumber=R020234 10-Apr-12 •• Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 o Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Qu erX I Assessor Sales Search Clerk&Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search • Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary • Parcel Detail .Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail . Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 112011 Mill Levy 0 1 001- R009142 273718225027 31.653 0 Primary Owner Name and Address 0 VICTORIANSQUARE LLC • 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 0 Additional Owner Detail • Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 1 • 0 Location • Physical Address: IF601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: JIVICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value • Land: 1 0 _ 01 • Improvements]�— 825,300 239,3 0 Total: 825,300 239,340 i • http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumbeY=R009142 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 • Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 1 Buildings: • Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics • OFFICE FIRST FLOOR: 717 ' Total Area: 11717 Property Class: 12245 Actual Year Built: 111975 . Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: JIGOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Nei hborhood: VICTORIANSQUARE "B" Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page • The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. A Copyright© 2003 -2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database&Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009142 10-Apr-12 •• Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 • Pitkin County Assessor i Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk&Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search • Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail • Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 001 R009143 273718225028 31.653 Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC • 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 2 Location Physical Address: 11601 E HYMAN AVE AS . Subdivision: JIVICTORIANSQUARE • Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value • Land: 0110 • Improvements: 962,100 L279,010 • Total: 962,1001 279,010 0 • http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009143 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 • Sale Date: Sale Price: !. Additional Sales Detail i Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 • Buildin s: • Number of Comm/Ind 1 Buildings: • Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE SECOND/THIRD: 1,194 Total Area.-IF,194 Property Class: 12245 i Actual 11975 Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: IGOOD BASE . Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE • Nei hborhood: VICTORIAN SQUARE "B" • Top of Page M Assessor Database Search Options • Pitkin County Home Page 0 The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, . Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright© 2003 -2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. 0 Database &Web Design by Good Turns Software. 0 • 0 0 • http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009143 10-Apr-12 w db Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 • • 0 • Pitkin County Assessor • Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Qu I Assessor Sales Search • Clerk&Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search • Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary • • Parcel Detail Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail • Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Ar-e–a]l Account Number Parcel Number 112011 Mill Levy • 1 001 R009144 lL2737182250ZLI 31.653 • • Primary Owner Name and Address • • VICTORIANSQUARE LLC • 418 E COOPER AVE#207 • ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail • • Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 3 • • Location • • Physical Address: 11601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN • Subdivision: IVICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 • 2011 Property Value Summary — 11 Actual Value Fssessed Value • Land: 11 0 • I Improvements:Improvements:11 499,600 144,880 • Total: 499,600 144,880 • 11 http://www.piticinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009144 10-Apr-12 • db Parcel Detail Page.2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: • Number of Comm/Ind1 Buildings: • Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE SECOND/TH IRD: 620 • Total Area: 620 Property Class: 2245 Actual Year Built: 1975 • Effective 11985 • Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: IGOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Nei hborhood: VICTORIAN SQUARE "B" .11 Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright©2003 -2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database &Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber—R009144 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 • Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Propea Search I Assessor Subset Que I Assessor Sales Search Clerk&Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search • Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail . Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 112011 Mill Levy 001 R009145 273718225030 31.653 Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC • 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail • Legal Description Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 4 Location Physical Address: 11601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN • Subdivision: JJVICTOR.IAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 0F 0 Improvements] 507,600 147,200 Total: 507,60011 147,200 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009145 10-Apr-12 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 S �Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential OF • Buildin s• 1 Number of Comm/Ind1 Buildings: S Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE SECOND/THIRD: IF63o . Total Area: 630 Property Class: 112245 • Actual 11975 • Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE Exterior Wall: JIGOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Neighborhood: JIVICTORIAN SQUARE "B" Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, • Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database &Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009145 10-Apr-12 • Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Pitkin County Assessor • Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset OuerX I Assessor Sales Search Clerk&Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search • Basic Building Characteristics Value Summary • Parcel Detail Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy 00171 R009146 273718225031 31.653 w Primary Owner Name and Address VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description • Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 5 Location i Physical Address: 11601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN S Subdivision: IVICTORIAN SQUARE Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2011 Property Value Summary 11 Actual F Assessed Value Land: 11 0 Improvements: 760,900 220,660 Total: 760,900 220,660 http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009146 10-Apr-12 • Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildin s: S Number of Comm/Ind 1 • Buildings: • Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE FIRST FLOOR: 661 Total Area: 661 •; Property Class: 112245 . Actual Year Built: 1975 Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE • Exterior Wall: FG665 BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Neighborhood: JIVICTORIAN SQUARE Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright© 2003 - 2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database &Web Design by Good Turns Software. • http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009146 10-Apr-12 w • Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 • • • Pitkin County Assessor • • Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search • Clerk&Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search • Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary • • Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail • Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number 2011 Mill Levy • 001 R009147 IL 273718225032 IL 31.653 • • Primary Owner Name and Address • • VICTORIANSQUARE LLC • 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 • Additional Owner Detail • Legal Description ` Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 6 • • Location • Physical Address: 11601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: JJVICTOIRJAN SQUARE • Land Acres: • Land Sq Ft: 110 2011 Property Value Summary Actual Value Assessed Valu • Land: 1 0 0 • improvements: 960,000 E278,400 • Total: F 960,000 F 278,400 • • http://www.pidcinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009147 10-Apr-12 • Parcel Detail Page 2 of 2 Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind1 Buildings: . Commercial/Industrial Building.Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE FIRST FLOOR: 834 Total Area: 11834 • Property Class: 112245 • Actual Year Built: I 1975 S Effective Year Built: 1985 Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE • Exterior Wall: JIGOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Nei hborhood: VICTORIANSQUARE "B" Top of Page • Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page a The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data.However, Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright© 2003 -2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database&Web Design by Good Turns Software: http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009147 10-Apr-12 r • • Parcel Detail Page I of 2 • • • Pitkin County Assessor • • Parcel Detail Information • Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Que I Assessor Sales Search • Clerk&Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search ® Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary • • Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail • Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs • Tax Areall Account Number Parcel Numbed 2011 Mill Levy • 001 R009148 273718225033 =.653 • • • Primary Owner Name and Address • • VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC • 418 E COOPER AVE#207 • ASPEN, CO 81611 • Additional Owner Detail • • Legal Description • Subdivision: VICTORIAN SQUARE Unit: 7 • • Location • • Physical Address: 11601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN • Subdivision: JIVICTORIAN SQUARE • Land Acres: • Land Sq Ft: 170 - 2011 02011 Property Value Summary • Actual Value Assessed Value • Land: 0 0 • improvements: 689,500 199,960 • Total: 689,500 199,960 • • • http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009148 10-Apr-12 • • Page Parcel Detail Pa g Sale Date: Sale Price: Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics r Number of Residential 0 • Buildin s: . Number of Comm/Ind1 Buildings: I • Commercial/Industrial Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics OFFICE FIRST FLOOR: JF599 • Total Area: 599 • Property Class: 12245 • Actual Year Builtl 1975 • Effective Year Built: 111985 • Quality of Construction: GOOD-BASE • Exterior Wall: 11GOOD BASE Interior Wall: GOOD-BASE Nei hborhood: VICTORIANSQUARE "B" Top of Page • Assessor Database Search Options Pitkin County Home Page The Pitkin County Assessor's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, • Good Turns Software and the Pitkin County Assessor's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright© 2003 -2011 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database&Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R009148 10-Apr-12 Attachment 5 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT OF: VICTORIAN -SQUARE COND MINIUM /'PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED ON THE N /2 OF. LOTS A, B, &C IN BLOCK 100, IN THE SWY4 OF SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OFCOLORADO s SHEET 1 OF 1 "cam:-1 I� VICINITY MAP SCALE:V=20W Fr GRAPHIC SCALE ° �������t � PROPERTY DESCRIPTION s #xJr u• • n f-4't VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS,ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOFRECORDED AUGUST 14,1979 IN PLAT BOOK 8 AT PAGE 25,AND AS DEFINED (IN FEET) I \ �' " �,'J 3h.-.. •s 3` - ' AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR VICTORIAN SQUARE 1 Inch= loft. ., A r .CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED AUGUST 14,1979 IN BOOK 374 AT PAGE 124. , . CITY AND „ nx°iFs d Y, t COUNTY RKIN EOFASPEN OF 2 '„a, •. d` '� Sh§+'�-�` TSTATE OF COLORADO ME MIS 4yYY y 0. CONCRETE CURL&GUTTER TYP. s G�Lf,7'+t tr7u"��,,,.��cdl'?°��.tt^��`�'4,.�k�5`T°✓�-”. ” Yi'.d'.. s? c .NOTES q v p p 1) DATE OF SURVEY:APRIL 17,2012.146 $p5° . O145 2) DATE OF PREPARATION:APRIL,20 12.OVIVIE 90.00' .. sc 7:1i1�. z• v� �\` / / 3) BASIS OF BEARING:A#5 REB G OF S 75'09'11"E FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A,BLOCK 5.20' FOUND BENCHMARK I100 MONUMENTED BYA#S REBA0.&PLASTIC CAP LS.#28643 AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT f, p,�>L PV p��"7'<•�„ FOUND#9REBAR 4.79' y4T�}E'iq;•" .x, t� '19'35 ELEV.=7924.79 ,BLOCK 100 MONUMENTED BY A PK NAIL W/SHINER L.S.#28643. C �/- ---- VICTORIAN SQUARE - " �\\ CONDOMINIUM 4) BASIS OF SURVEY:THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUM AS RECORDED IN 4500 SQ.FT. 0.103 ACRES t t BOOK 8 AT PAGE 25 AS RECEPTION NO.217115,THE FINAL PLAT OF THE AAM SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED J+ - / STEEL POST O fTYP.) .. IN BOOK 960N PAGE 9AS RECEPTION N0.577041,THE CITU OF ASPEN-GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION DECEMBER PREPARED 5,VARIOMARCIVARIOUENGINEERS NTS ATEDOF RE ORD,009,THE OFFICFOUND MONOL MAP, ENTS,ITY ASPEN, .DECEMBER 32,1959,VARIDUS DOCUMENTS OF RECORD,AND THE FOUND MONUMENTS,AS SHOWN. f'#'`r r s 4•"f`• F=J92.5.38 TWO STORY BRICK '^ ci „ OFFICE BUILDING - v� 'O 5)THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING,LLC ISE)TO DETERMINE 2 .BRICK WALL 601 HYMAN AVE. - k E. � OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD.FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS,RIGHTS OF WAYAND/OR TLTLE OF RECORD,SE REUED UPON THE ABOVE SAID PLATS DESCRIBED IN NOTE 4 ANDTHE ...... v $; eZi / - TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE,INC.UNDER CASE NO.PCT12860C2 WITH AN p m .. VG. EFFECTIVE DATE OF JULY,15,1998, q��G IOa�E " 6) BASIS OF ELEVATION:THE CITY OF ASPEN-GPS CONTROL MONUMENTATION 2009 CONTROL DATUM, x4ia -""il, . '1y• .'� 7929 \ AC UNIT 3rjQ O 5��P 1 W HIGH IS BASED ON AN ELEVATION OF 7720.88'(NAND 1988)ON THE NGS STATION"5-159",AND AN kr­ BRICK WALL Op Z k�O(„Oay61 BENCHMARK,SHOWN HEREON.ELEVATION OF 7911.98-(NAVD 1988)ON THE NGS STATION"Q-159".THIS ESTABLISHED THE PROJECT 1�•� Y utyR 9\.89 5.19 b'\-�.c,Q�N • c �T�.qT x a �z ` L'+'- 7)-CONTOUR INTERVAL:ONE f1)FOOT. m -4.74' Lzi 4.75' ,8)THE LINEAR UNIT USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAT IS THE U.S.SURVEY FOOT AS DEFINEDBY 'd"dlFi!'?<' •7 "-'"y S 5°09F22"E . 90:H)D';:. PRIVATE GRAVEL THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND 1 B G FOUND#5REaAR PARKING TECHNOLOGY. IJIS' 7 &PLASTIC CAP �� g •r LS.#19598 v TITLE NOTE a!`'� wY' 0• $• g BRASS CITNESS AC UNIT AND DUCT WORK c LS.N2CAP - ~ � -. 11-ACCORDINGTO THE.ENCROACHMENT UCENSE RECORDED FEBRUARY 18,1994 A5 RECEPTION NO. La.#26Cd3' SUBJECT FOE NOS.367 22& 367122 AND AMENDMENT TO SAID ENCROACHMENT LICENSE RECORDED DECEMBER 11,1996AS LICENCE REC.NO5.367122& 399918 SEE TITLE NOTE 1 RECEPTION N0.399918,VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION GRANTS A REVOCABLE flyrp LICENSE TO THE OWNERS OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOTS A,B,COF BLOCK 100 FOR"EXTERIOR DUCT WORK, k`.{•zt.,£-- .e•f:, 1ryj - 9 - WNRI4GANDOTNER MECHANKAL AND/OR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT OR DEVICES...'AS WELL AS"EXISTING LEGEND - ,,F r x 'u's..q ,+'a' F q,G ENCROACHMENTS(USED BY LITTLE OWES RESTAURANT)TO BE USED FOR EXHAUSTSMOKE PURPOSES AN ADDITIONAL DUCTCURB STOP t+' > ,EL YS. ���h 5�' ��� ® o ANDTO ENCROACHMENTS)TO BEUSEDION FFOROEXHAUST SMOKE PURPOSES BIY CH MCSTORUE'S PUB." LIGHT POLEOF pQ WATER VALVE � It�'A ',�� �i�, o+' �6 Q• cjS 1$ � . # n�" ,rnA-F• �uu�' 3 rcG N`\P��40'1" 0 SEWER MANHOLE M ELECTRIC METER �ty a`r d ET"P ' r -v�� 011 'SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE M TELEPHONE PEDESTAL I,GEOFFREY R.KELLER,HEREBY CERTIFY TO VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY -v- SIGN ❑ T„ f4 '°•Ja'¢y'� COMPANY AND PITKIN COUNTY TITLE,INC.,THAT THIS IS AN"IMPROVEMENTSURVEYPIAI"ASDEFINED 0 STORM MANHOLE a{ S{" V} BY C.R.S.§38-51-102(9),AND THAT IT IS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY SHOWING THE CURRENT �.. WATER COURSES,WATER FEATURES AND/OR BODIES OF WATER,FLOOD —.t—.t— UNDERGROUNDTELEPHONE s r�P �1'> �. �t> rat L.Y . FOUND#ITICCA LOCATIONOFALL STRUCTURES, / t.L7rS r " ` WITH PLASTI3.. PLAIN,VISIBLE ROADS,TRAILS,OF ALL B FENCES,ESHEDGES,F SUCH OR WALLS SITUATED ON THE DESCRIBED —uq—ue— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ars q,n2' �+ `sa.P,sr. -X` n L.S.N0.28643 PARCELAND WITHIN FIVE FEET OFALL BOUNDARIES OF SUCH PARCEL,ANY CONFLICTING BOUNDARY —ea—Re— SEWER LINE EVIDENCE rS xk fIE,TFSCi'�,:',.. ` .. § EVIDENCE OR VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS,AND ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF A PUBLIC OR WATER LINE gi/' °f' T "Ycw'-vo' PRIVATE NATURE THATARE VISIBLE,OR APPARENT,OR OF RECORD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES GAS UNE a ue d"T dgdu rd 'k^d� �.3yyy @ - ••' �s}� - v,T ,yx,'"1' DESCRIBED IN PITKIN COUNTY nTLE INVS TITLE INSURANCE CASE NO.PCT128SOCZ OR OTHER SOURCES —u9—uy— C' tia�k "�-.t1�.,. --Ggj=,A °— d.. .-y 9 AS SP IFIED ON THEI 4S7��flT URVEY PLAT. 'x'm z c�n ' `. YT'.. 5::i Co!tC�. o D— IRON FENCE ug ug u9 - -uc— UNDERGROUND CABLE ug. 9— u. ss ss $,k'S�'- 31',}# 3,r # �Lti' b* 4 E 4G �'``�� l V —st—st— STORM SEWER LINE <. xY a ; W ® c D#''3�L' 4� t :" ,, �""9r `e 3 GEOFFREY R.K GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:m - mt yX�5�71 i.The locations of underground utilities have been plotted based on SO P R I S ENGINEERING - LLC utility maps,construction/design plans,other information provided by utility companies and actual field locations in some instances.These CIVIL CONSULTANTS utilities,as shown,may not represent actual field conditions.It is the 502 MAIN STREET,SUITE A3 NOTICE:gCCOIl01NGTOCOIORAOOIAWYOOMFIETCOMMENCEANYIEOM responsibility of the contractor to contact all utility companies for field ACTION BgSEDOPONANY DfFERWTNSRUgNEYWOHINTNRFEYFARf P Y tY P CARBONDALE,COLORADO 81623 ARLAYW FIRST 06[OVFq SOON OEfER.IN NOfVEMIMYRNI'NCFION location of utilities prior to construction. &SED UPOHANY OEFECFINiNRSUPNEY BE COMMfH[FD MOREIXANTFN 970 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM us E2RR2 oa-m2Rt2 a:oez-aP.mvs YEYRSNIOM ME GATE OF CERfIFKATN)NSHOVM HEREON I• Attachment 6 • • • • Mr. Ronald Garfield,President Victorian Square, LLC 601 East Hyman Avenue • Aspen,CO 816111 Tel:970-925-1936 • • 17 April 2012 • Ms.Sara Adams Senior Planner City of Aspen Community Development Department • 130 S.Galena St.,3rd Floor Aspen,CO 81611 • • Dear Ms.Adams: This letter is to certify that i,Ronald Garfield, President of Victorian Square,LLC,owner of the property located at 601 East Hyman Avenue,Aspen,Colorado,known as the • Victorian Square Condominiums,give Stan Clauson Associates,Inc.and its staff • permission to represent us in discussions with the City of Aspen regarding applications for • the this property. If you should have any questions regarding this matter,please contact me. Their contact information is as follows: • • Stan Clauson,AICP,ASLA Stan Clauson Associates, Inc • 412 N.Mill Street Aspen, CO 81611 • Tel (970)925-2323 • Fax(970)920-1628 Very Trul Yours, • All • onald LaFfiet stdent,Victorian Square, LLC • • • • • • • • • • • • • Attachment 7 • • • O & E REPORT • . To: GARFIELD & HECHT PC Date Ordered: 04-17-2012 Land Tale GUARAMEE COMPANY Attn: STACY STANEK Order Number 427645 WWW.LT G C.C OM • Fax: 970-925-3008 Phone: 970-925-1936 • • Address: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 County: PITKIN • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. • • • • • OWNERSHIP&ENCUMBRANCES Certification Date: 04-13-2012 OWNERSHIP: VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC Doc Type Doc Fee Date Reference# DEED $0.00 07-15-1998 419488 DEED $0.00 11-09-1998 424287 • • ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS • Item Payable To Amount Date Reference# • DEED OF TRUST US BANK $3,000,000.00 01-24-07 533719 • • • • • Cust Ref# • This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any form of title guaranty nor • B . DANIEL BENNETTS insurance.The liability of this company shall not exceed the charge paid by the applicant for this report,y� nor shall the company be held liable to any party other than the applicant for this report. Land Title • Property Resource Specialist Email: dbennetts@Itgc.com • Phone: 303-850-4105 • Fax: 303-850-4184 Form OE.WEB 06/06 • • • • . Prepared For: Ladd Tile GARFIELD&HECHT PC • GUARAlU COMPANY STACY STANEK • W*"",c co" • Reference: 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 Attached are the additional documents you requested: • Doc Type Recorded Reception#IBookPagee DANIEL BENNETTS Land Title Property Resource Specialist Email: dbennetts@Itgc.com Phone: 303-850-4105 • Fax: 303-850-4184 ADD.DOCS 427645 • • • SCHEDULE A-OWNER'S POLICY • CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY AMOUNT OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER PCT12860C2 July 15, 1998 @ 4:15 PM $2,100,000.00 1312-120156 1. NAME OF INSURED: • VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED AND LIABILITY COMPANY • 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: • IN FEE SIMPLE 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN: VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED AND LIABILITY COMPANY, • 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded August 14, 1979 in Plat Book 8 at Page 25, and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Victorian Square • Condominiums recorded August 14, 1979 in Book 374 at Page 124. Countersigned: • • • • Authorized Officer • PITKIN COUNTY TITLE,INC. 601 E.HOPKINS AVE. . ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 (970)925-1766 • (970)925-6527 FAX PITKIN COUNTY TITLE,INC. • 601 E.HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 • (970)925-1766/(970)-925-6527 FAX • • THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE COVER SHEET. • • • • • • SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER • PCT12860C2 July 15, 1998 @ 4:15 PM 1312-120156 • THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. • 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,encroachments, any facts which a correct • survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien,for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. • 5. Water rights, claims or title to water. • 6. Taxes and assessments(not including condominium or homeowners association assessments or dues)for the year 98 and subsequent years only, a lien not yet due and payable. • 7. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 224 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any • valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 8. Terms, conditions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Statement of Exception from the Full Subdivision Process recorded July 12, 1979 in Book 372 at Page 499. 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions and assessments as forth in the Condominium Declaration for Victorian Square Condominiums recorded August 14, 1979 in Book 374 at Page 124, deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, • religion, sex, handicap,familial status or national origin. 10. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded August 14, 1979 in Plat • Book 8 at Page 25. • 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Encroachment License recorded February 18, 1994 in Book 742 at Page 296 • and Amendment thereto recorded December 11, 1996 as Reception No. 399918. • 12. Deed of Trust,Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing from : VICTORIAN SQUARE, LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED • LIABILITY COMPANY To the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin For the use of : GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION,A NEW YORK • CORPORATION Original Amount : $1,500,000.00 • Dated : JULY 15, 1998 Recorded : JULY 15, 1998 Reception No. : 419490 . (Continued) POLICY NO. 1312-120156 CASE NO. PCT12860C2 • SCHEDULE B-OWNERS--EXCEPTIONS--CONTINUED-- 13. Rights of tenants in possession under unrecorded leases solely as tenants and solely with respect to space occupied by each such tenant, . (together with non-exclusive rights in common with other tenants in areas used by all tenants). 14. Security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code affecting subject property, notice of which is given by Financing Statement from VICTORIAN SQUARE, LLC, debtor to GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, secured party, Recorded July 15, 1998 as Reception No.419492. EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED NONE ARE HEREBY OMITTED. Attachment 8 rowland+broughton architecture and urban design 234 e.hopkim ave. 3377 bloke&,106 aspen,m 61611 deme,,.MO 970.544.9006 v 303.308.13]3 v 970.544.3473( 303.308.13751 CansWtanis: STAN'tCLANSON ASSOCIATESIrc�. ..•....... l sua°�mn�nc.esry�vmmsuv�+w Lcw. Iss 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL FINAL COMIMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 1 RE DESI " ' 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL'ftv'ff " EW DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW ..................._........................ ...................._... 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE I� ,. .____......_.__....._........................ 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 PROJECT NO: 21213.00 ..........................._........_.............._._..................... SHEET TITLE: COVER SHEET SCALE: a A0.0 rowland+broughton architecture and urban design CANOPY OVERNANGABOVE 234 e.Mpmm eve. 3377 blak,9,109 940.6 . 91811 deme.,m 80209 970.6" 970.54 U73I 303.308.1378! .309.1373v y_ ,l i PEDESTRIANAMENHY SHAREDLOBSY ' I / n 149 OF PROPE 2396E •COMM.179 SF(75%) �-�// -RES 60 SF(25%) /// f0 i ij LOBBY ConeuBenb. 2,588 SF GROSS .• 3 Sy(N ✓ j' 4---84 SF STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESIec ( -COMM.898E(100%) ��,. .... .�. STAIR 6 ELEVATOR 280 SF I // / I STAIR A ELEVATOR TRAs)ImEcrcw4G U -COMM. 2106F(75%) / I 277 SF y -RES. 706E(25%) /' -COMM.2086E(75%) 246 SF / -RES 69 SF % - li (� 1 COM I' -- -- M. ISS SF % _ -- — -RES. 618E(25%)'' — -------- -- STAIR STAIRS( EXEMPT) 191 SF 190 SF -COM" SF(75%) LEVEL 0 FLOOR PLAN -� 47SF(25%) LEVEL I FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN __......__.._....._..................._..._........................ Iceue: 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR AREA: NET LEASABLE: FLOOR AREA: NET LEASABLE: FLOOR AREA: NET LEASABLE: AaauCA110NEW 3,602 SF x O% =0 SF 1,816 SF COMMERCIAL 2,588 SF RETAIL 2,497817COMMERCIAL 3,150 SF OFFICE 3,004 SF COMMERCIAL 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH + 955 SF •NON-UNIT 191 SF STAIR EXEMPT 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL 3,543 SF FLOORPLATE +361 SF NON-UNIT. DESIGN REVIEW 3,738 SF FLOOR PLATE RE-SUBMITTAL 1 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW RE91DENnAL 1,801 SF(NET) -- 1,908 SF(GROSS) DECK(304 SF) ® / % j / FLOOR AREA TOTALS: EXEMPT RESIDENTIAL DECK AREA: LEGEND: GREEN ROOF(EXEMFn 5,822 SF COMMERCIAL (75%) 2,250 SF ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA NET LIVABLE FLOOR AREA 601 EAST HYMAN GREEN RODE ,_J / +1.908 §E RESIDENTIAL (25%) x 15% PERCENT ALLOWED (E�I4Pr, ���' s7aRs(ExEMPp NET LEASABLE FLOOR AREA AVENUE I 284 SF 7,730 SF TOTAL AREA(100%) 338 SF EXEMPT DECKAREA DECK AREA ;% I ALLOWABLE RESIDENTIAL DECK AREA: EXEMPT AREA i /" / 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE o / 338 SF EXEMPT DECK AREANON-UNIT SPACE Ili ASPEN,CO 81611 +38 SF RESIDENTIAL EXTRA 0 376 SF TOTAL DECK AREA ALLOWED GREEN ROOF -- -- ----- PEDESTRIAN AMENITY GREEN ROOF(EXEAIPf) PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DECK AREA: DECK 72 SF 304 SF DECK#1 §EED CK#2 376 SF TOTAL DECK AREA PROPOSED LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN FLOOR AREA: NET LIVABLE: PROJECT NO: 21213.00 2,050 SF RESIDENTIAL 1,801 SF RESIDENTIAL 284 SF EXEMPTIONS `NON-UNIT .............................................................__.._....... 2,334 SF FLOOR PLATE SHEET TITLE; PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS F SCALE: As indicated A0.3 d8 rowland+broughton architecture and urban design 2.e.bopkins eve. 3371 bkke al,106 aspen ro81611 tlenver,m 80205 970.594.9008 v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.13751 3 601 EAS'F'WMAM AVER FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS-PROPOSEQ C°"°"- • _+ 4/8/2013 -�-STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESm� FLOOR AREA NON-Mr SPACE FLOOR AREA o a tl FLOOR LEVEL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL TOTAL COMM. 75% RES. 25% TOTAL 100% TOTALS DECK AREA q LEVELO 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF �W N W W LEVEL 1 2,588 SF 0 SF 2,588 SF 719 SF 236 SF 955 SF 3,543 SF 0 SF LEVEL 2 3,234 SF 0 SF 3,234 SF 209 Sr- 68 SF 277 SF 3,511 SF 0 SF a" o ••�e: 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL LEVEL 3 0 SF 1,908 SF 1,908 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF 1,908 SF 376.0 SF SSa 5 DESIGN REVIEW 3-0 y APPLICATION TOTAL 5,822 SF 1,908 SF 7,730 SF 928 SF 304 SF1,232 SF 8,962 SF 376.0 SF 06.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH a' 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA o @ m DESIGN REVIEW 3 RESUBMITTAL 1 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 5,822 SF 928 SF 6,750 SF 1 50 :1 `m m c' c 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 6,750 SF 1.50 :1 w RE-SUBMITTAL 2 DIFFERENCE-UNDER/(OVER) 0 SF o 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL aW RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA 0 0 COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW TOTAL FLOOR AREA 1,908 SF 304 SF 2,212 SFS m E;- DECK -DECK AREA COUNTING TOWARD FLOOR AREA 38 38 SF v$ TOTAL FLOOR AREA 2,250 SF 0 50 W V ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREAo 0 2,250 SF 0.50 :1 w p O A DIFFERENCE-UNDERAC SF °'w A W V V W 131 TOTAL BUILDING FLOOR AREA TOTAL BUILDING FLOOR AREA 8,072 SF 1,232 SF 9,304 SF 2 07 :1 ALLOWABLE TOTAL FLOOR AREA 11,250 SF 2.50 :1 DIFFERENCE-UNDER/'OVER' 1,946 SF 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE NET LEASABLE COMMERCIAL AREA NET LIVABLE RESIDENTIAL AREA Notes: LEVEL 0 1,816 SF LEVEL 0 0 SF Zone District Cl 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE LEVEL1 2,497 SF LEVEL 1 0 SF Property Size 4,500 SF ASPEN,CO 61611 LEVEL 2 3,004 SF LEVEL 2 0 SF Maximum Fro"arket LEVEL 3 0 SF _JkEVEL 3 1,801 SF Multifamily Housing 2,250 SF TOTAL 7,317 SF 11TOTAL 1,801 SF Allowable Residential Deck 338.0 SF PROJECT NO: 21213.00 SHEET TITLE'. PROPOSED FLOOR AREA ¢ SUMMARY SCALE A0.3-1 3� w ea II ry rowland+broughton architecture and urban design 234 o.h.pNm eve. 3371 Wk..1,106 .w.,w 81611 d.—r,w 80205 670.596.9006 v 303.308.1373 v Bro.5N.3473 I 303.306.13751 1 _ ___- __- _.._� - �3�STAN CLAOSON ASSOCIATESeec r r i ; ___ .......-- L1 0CONCEPTUAL �I• ,. F - _ `� _ 2012 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION - - -- --' 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL - - 6 DESIGN REVIEW •- ..." ,� -.. RESUBMITTAL 1 r. 07.032012 CONCEPTUAL A'milk DESIGN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL 2 VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW ..... ...._._........._.._......................... ,. low 601 EAST HYMAN ° AVENUE 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 .,.._�. -� PROJECT NO: 21213.00 ', 6HEET T1TlE: .� ,. PROPOSED -- MODEL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHYWST VIEW LOWNGWEST RENDERING SCALE: A0.5 H it Ado 1 — rowland+broughton architecture and urban design 236 0.IiePklOo ave. 3377Nob N,108 open w81811 d. ..80205 870.SM.B0081 303.308.1373, S'.W.U73f 303.308.1375f I 7: f � � � ConaJlants. STAN CLAKS ASSOCIALE SIac f�rrrr� w .t PETERSEN TEGL KOLUMBA BRICK,LAP PATTERN GLASS STOREFRONT BRICKWITH STEEL ACCENTS A l - .. "...... .. ............. ... ......................... ow 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 PROJECT NO: yAeiOi 21213.00 Nv SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED MATERIALS SCALE: 3 GLASS STOREFRONT WITH WOOD ACCENTS LAMINATE PANELS VNTH WOOD FINISH AO.V a !8 rowland+broughton architecture and urban design 236 e.Wp—vve. 3377 bake x,188 vepen,co 81611 do—,m 88285 BTO.S/C.BOD6v 383.38&1373, 870.5 .3673f 383.388.1375( TAN» LAaBS N ASSOCIAT l l l IT, 1 j r _ � SESNBc 71-1 SPRING T. HUNTER ST. --T � I Icor: - 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW I APPLICATION I 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD I I 1 HYMAN AVE.ELEVATION STUDY i OUTREACH A0.6 SCALE: 337-1'-0' 1 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL I I 1 DESIGN REVIEW ASPEN ART MUSEUM 625 MUSEI I RE-SUBMITTAL 1 Sol E.HYMAN AVE. 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW I RE-SUBMITTAL 2 - 1 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION j I I 04.08.2013 FINAL I I COMMERCIAL I I DESIGN REVIEW ,� � � 11 II ii II II II I1 II I I ...1'.:.:.',�'.`•'`...:.`,` 11 II II Il II Ii 11 II II 11 I 11 II II II II II ,�: r.,. LI L II It It 1.1 II It I1 II II II II II II __ _ a _1 I II II 61 II It II II II II II II II II II II II _ I r,... 1 I� 11 II II II 11 17 II 11 II II I1 II I 1 II I I 11 I I I I i t Yrll � I I I I I 1 1 I I I I --- - .. 11 II. I1 II II 11 QA�l�1ll II II II II '':..•. . II II 11 II II II �.1 1 II II II II II II ii ii - -171 - + coATaq�f?�, 1 I I I I I I I I I I'TFt"71 I I I I I _ 1_�ARP--- 11 II II II l II I I \ 11 II It 11 II II II II II II II II II jj II II II + 11 II II II II 11 II 1II 11 II II 11 II 11 11 II 11 .� � 11 11 II II II II It II ,�, II II I1 IJ it II I1 I 11 11 11 I1 il, I LI II II I t � f a 11 11 If II II II 11 II 11 II II 11 I ..: 11 II It It 11 .,A I ,`� 11 II II II 11 II Ili II II 11 II II fl 11 It II " 11 II II li II Il Il II II II 11 II II II II II II !� i� I II II fl II II II Il 11 II 11 II II .+ et u• I .I li• II II II II 11 li II !1 II II I1 11 I1 11 1 � ?+' 1 clow I1 I1 II Ii I1 II 11 I I I.i ACCM 601 EAST HYMAN eakx. ! ` 11 II II II I I 11 � Y51 I I .fi I7 11 II II II II II II 11 Ce II II • 11 li Ii 11 II I1 II �I III II 1.' '' f'i AVENUE ': $¢ I II II II II II II II II II it �•'�=i I :�I� 1, BBVAT011 LIFTm _ g ? L P 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE O _ ASPEN,C081611 �. L_— El 78/ 9 C3 q � �5"";3{ ( •.�T'e5Y' .�7 fin„ _ ,t 4I•'�. ���.�`� t, as'��1 ;sem"@ `�r.�.,<.''� d"'.R �,. HYMAN AVE \� PROJECT NO: 21213.08 SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED HYMAN AVE. MASSING STUDY - SCALE: 3132"=V-0" q A0.6 Saa rV 20'4r 14.6 0 30.310 rowland+Broughton architecture and urban design 23a*.f PWM eve. 3377 bkke et,106 81611 domw,w SD205 970.544.9008 v 303.308.1373v 970.544.3473f 3D3.308.1375 f HYMAN AVENUE ................ Cormularft: PROPERT'LINE —--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--— ................................... 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW ELEVATOR APPLICATION EQUIPMENT 05.30.2012 F NEIGHBOEACH RHOOD OUTR 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL 111 DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 1 JANITOR 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL2 08.01.2012 GMQS APPLICATION 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL L COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW ELEVATOR .................................... STAIR I 0— — AND PAD BE TRANSFORMER—�—�—� I HALLWAY W;IN.FL --- -- ------- .............. ............... VE -------- I L i L- 601 EAST HYMAN STAIR2: . . . -- ---- AVENUE CABLE/ MENS: MENS, MECHANICAL I.T. AND UP Up PHONES WATER 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 —--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—--—---- PROJECT NO: --__—.._.._- 21213.0D SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED SCALE: .............. BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 8 A2.0 SCALE: PLAN TRUE A NORTH NORTH 2.0 ® A 8 C Q E P G r� 21Y.W "$i? '""? gd '°� rip rowland+Broughton architecture and urban des v" zU..M 61111 3377 bI.Im-k "� s'ro.sm.aooe. me.un 3.xr NX$ lro.sa.3anAl r 3m.�l/.,aTsr \ D 4 p ` D P D P SIDEWALK pP pP RMP p0 0 0 op P _ ✓ J����R� .i PROPERTY LINE ---- ----- ---- � CANOPY ABOVE O- --- 1 I 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW ------_- I -, ? APPLICATION p I I Y I I � NEIGHBORHOOD P 05.30.2012 OUTREACH 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBM �' I) I07.03.2012 CONCEPTUALIL 1 1 11 I COMMERCIAL AND I w DESIGN REVIEW RESIIDEEBNTIAL I RE-SUBMITTAL2 LOB 08.01.2012 GMQS �I til L$-"N.FFL. APPLICATION COMMERCIAL I 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW I II P (7AT.R ................ ......._...................... _..._ D p IIII D I UTILITY METERS I O 3 -OPENING W/ I ; GATE I � - '� f-'---- fismoRIP MM CM i STAIR I 4 1 I DN UP 1 \ I TRASHIRECYCLING -HALL NONCOMSusn1LE rj UP - BACK OF HOUSE OFFICES 6 601 EAST HYMAN FENCE AND GATE - I -- =��T - __= I AVENUE TRANSFORMER s I O AAND PADSTAIR2 WQMENS� AMENS% 4 < CANOPY ABOVE - - I I I ' , I 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN C081611 PROPERTY UNE I I I I PROJECT NO: 2i213.OD I A O O SHEET TRLE: PROPOSED LEVEL ONE FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED SCALE: 3/16"=1'-O" 1 LEVEL ONE FLOOR PLAN ^"'11 A2.1 SCALE 3116","0 PIAN TRUE 1 a NORTH NORTH A B C D w O F O 84? ,4.5,7 3°J1fI rowland+Broughton ar hitedurn and urban design k 234.. PN^ N4 — 3377 .k. 108 ..P.0,m 81811 d—,m80205 970.5/4.9008, 303.30&1373v 970.544.34731 303.30&13751 HYMAN AVENUE ..__..._..._..... ......................._....._.._.... . STAN CLAIISON ASSOOIATESmc PROPERTY UNE ------------------------------------------------ I ..........................._....................... I I lau.: 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL \.J 1 DESIGN REVIEW I COPY BnOW APPLICATION 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD 2 I I OUTREACH 2 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL I DESIGN REVIEW I RESUBMITTAL 1 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW I I RESUBMITTAL2 I i 08.01.2012 CMOS � APPLICATION m ) 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW II COMMERCIAL I ELEVATOR t .. M, NFL. 1 I I 1' 119' I I Fj "u LOBBY $ I I STAIR 1 I I DN UP I I — I 4 ...._....._......._..............................__._........_... TRANSFORMER— AND RANSFORMER AND PAD BELOW —_- -_— - 5 601 EAST HYMAN DP AVENUE STAIR 2 'WOMENS,' MENS,' e CANOPY BELow I ON tc 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE _ �---- � ASPEN,C061811 _—__—_____—__—___________—_________ --___ S I i PROJECT NO: 21213.00 A O O � S1.N EET TRLE. PROPOSED LEVEL TWO FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED SCALE: 3/16"=.-1."-.0.. 1 LEVELTWO FLOOR PLAN 3 A22 SCALE: 3N6'=P-0" PLAN TRUE A2.2 NORTH NORTH .ow. w Brz Y 3'{ 20-0- 14'!12 3p'J 72 6'-0• 10-0- rowland+Broughton architecture and urban design 234 e.hopklna ave. 3377 bkke s1,108 aspen,.81611 d—r,co 80205 970.544.8006 v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473f 303.308.1375f HYMAN AVENUE ceraudanb: ��STAN CLAUS6N ASSOCIATESI�C wu�rn s<.x.,om PROPERTY LINE I I lour GUEST I IGUEST I EAVE ABOVE � III —4 1 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL BEDROOM BEDROO@i DESIGN REVIEW r-1 #1 I�l � CNOPY BELOW AP LICATION 05.30.2012 NEIGBORHOODG ROOM OUTREACH 2 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL C1 / / /\/\/ \/ DESIGN REVIEW \\\\\ \ \ \ \ I RE-SUBMITTAL 1 CONCEPTUAL ------------ \�\\ \ \�\\� I 07.03.2012 DESIGN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL2 CLOSET CLOSET / \/\/\ APPLICATION \\\\\\\ \/ /\ I ? 08.01.2012 CMOS JAI / \ EAVE ABOVE—-/l 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL F7EFOSET DESIGN REVIEW IF /,//// I BATH#1 BATH#2 \\\\\ \ \\\�\\/ HALL \�//\\ �/��/\\//\\/� riFd'Fl -- _ UNDRY ELEVATOR \/\/\/\ El H U --- MAST L-J710 \�V\Y\\//\ . CLOSE ��; STAIR I § MASTER BEDROOM MASTER _ 4 TRANSFORMER BATH AND PAD BELOW I r ROOF OVER STAIR I i9 6 a 601 EAST HYMAN DOOR BELOW AVENUE 4LIKITCHEN -- �#2 CANOPY BELOW ON jfifffi ! 0601—— —— OVEN \ \ \ \ \ \ /\ \ \/ I 601 EAST 81611 AVENUE ------- \ \\�kooF� \ \\ \\ \\\\\ \--\\ \------- ASPEN,C081611 -------------------- s I I III SII PROJECT NO: 21213.00 .SHE ......._E.T T.._T....RLE: . .... PROPOSED 3 LEVELTHREE 4 FLOOR PLAN r� SCALE:_ _3/16 V-0" 1 LEVELTHREEFLOOR PLAN - ____..... ......... O q2,3 SCALE 3/16•=1'-0' PLAN TRUE A2a3 y7 NORTH NORTH R oB o D ry "rz gd '"-T rowland+broughton architecture and urban design 2U..hwM.— 337r MM-1,108 ."n,w 81611 l—.-80703 970. .BWBv 31414=1373, 87055N443473, 303308.13787 Cor Went.: STAN GLANSBN ASSOCIATESISC ----------------------------------------------------------- I 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL — t DESIGN REVIEW I GREEN ROOF W I I APPLICATION I OUTLINE OF BUILDING BELOW OUTLINE OF BUILDING BELOW I I � 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD I — OUTREACH 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL I DESIGN REVIEW I I RESUBMITTAL 1 I 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL GREEN ROOF ( DESIGN REVIEW i 1 - BELOW i RE-SUBMITTAL2 I 08.01.2012 GMOS APPLICATION ¢ 04.08.2013 FINAL I GREEN ROOF BELOW DECK W BELOW - COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW l MEMBRANE ROOF ATOR ROO ......... I l 7 I ) 3 I ' I GREEN ROOF BELOW t I R OUTLINE OF BUILDING BELOW I * 5 ---- -- �------------- 601 EAST HYMAN BraRRooPBELow PARAPET I AVENUE DECK 82 BELOW I � GREEN ROOF BELOW ,^s � GREEN ROOF BELow $01 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 -- _--- ---__---_—_J — B PROJECT NO: 21213.00 A Inl C � BlaiETTRIE PROPOSED ROOF PLAN f PROPOSED SCALP: 3/19'•11-0" . 1 ROOF PLAN /� —....___.._. 2 A2.4 $M.E: 3NB'=IW PLAN TRUE A/'L.A ggg NORTN NORTH ETg It (� µ , TQ , rowland+broughton Y architecture and urban design '.p' 234 e.hop-,%ave. 3377 bloke k,108 Z .span•w 81811 de=,m 80205 ♦'$ t9S Td 13'd' taa I eio.w.xt �11si 3ae.3oe�u7Msr w ELEVATOR OVERRUN (BEYOND) ALLOWABLE ELEVATOR OVERRUN PAINTED METAL PLATE �_ LAMINATE PANELS WOOD FINISH T.D.HT_MAX —_—_—_—_—_——�36'-0' 'r STAN CLAIISON ASSOCIATESIrc T.O ROOF ....,.. �.m�..�r[...«. «n �. �ifmMavli.rvAmrta __.._ �...._ _. 42-PARAPET NTH METAL FLASHING r I 12s.o' yam,� ......... ; PETERSEN TEGL 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL zP r*lQ45 RAO' � � —.z_ - - _ KOLUMBABRICK 4DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION CONCEPTUAL _ 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD � ._. OUTREACH EE x 2y — ..._..I._._...1'.:�_ T .L_.__... —..._T fL _z _.�._. T.O.FlN.FL. •�� ` =x�— c.. '- .x._::r..._�_s=.-a:_.:....�_.. — — — — — — — — ——— — 08.072012 DESIGN REVIEW cd� ............._:r _ ._..... z_ �:.:- —:x_______"L_-___.x._.:....:::x:::.:::-:_rz.._.x..--__ . _ _ .__ ._ _ — -- —T—_� 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUALL �J -_ EGRESSSTAIR 08.01.2012 GRME-OSS ( r / r ORU BMITTAL2 / APPLICATION �� I / ♦ / _ 04.082013 FINAL COMMERCIAL l I ♦ 0 / .-Y._..._.._L HVMAN AVENUE DESIGN REVIEW t" `S–" _ ♦ — _ - COMMS—STOREFRONT TRANSFORMER BEHIND NON. I COMBUSTIBLE FENCENTWI GATES I DECORATIVE WOOD UTIIlfV ERY WI I ENTRY FRAME STEELPANELABOVE I I I 601 m I 1 JI �I I � AVENUE THYMAN 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 PROPOSED 1 WEST ELEVATION A4.1 SCALE: 3H6',V-7 PROJECT NO: 21213.00 SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16"=V-10" $ BRICK LAP SIDING V14TH PLATE STEEL ACCENTS GLASS STOREFRONT WOOD ACCENT LAMINATE PANELS WITH WOOD FI4BH ea rV rowland+broughton O O O O ^ architecture and urban design 2U*,�Pwm_ 3377 Malm*L 108 —,- :70 544.9006 d303-108,1=73, ......_A,I_OtAkL�ELEVATOROVRRUN ELEVATOR OVERRUN .......__.__...._.__,._. VERRUN . .HT,MAX -—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- _T0.ROOF 'I, 136-01 T ........... LAMINATE PANELS,WOW FINISH TAL CAP ETMtTN ............. !? ............... ............. .......—---------- 0 004.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW 102 APPLICATION 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH .......... .—.............. ......... 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL ...... ................... 1134r T RE-SUBMITTAL I .............. REVIEW 07.03.2012CONCEP 0 r 0 RE-SUBMITTAL2 EGRESS CANOPY 08.01.2012 GMQS BEYOND APPLICATION NON.COMBUSTIBLE 04.08.2013 FINAL FENCE BEYOND COMMERCIAL .. .... ...... 0 ...........__ .... DESIGN REVIEW ............ I HUNTER AVE NUE %tBENCH BENCH ............................... TO.FIN.FL LEVELON R SIDE AND WDOD \—DECORATWEV=U lDIY4P COMMERCIAL LOBBY ENTRY FRAME ENTRY FRAME —COMMERCIAL STOREFRONT— I BENCH COMMERCIAL STOREFRONT ............. T.O.FIN.FL 601 EAST HYMAN - — - — - — - —- — - -- AVENUE PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION .2 SCALE,- 3MV-1*4r 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO81611 .................... PROJECT NO: 21213.01) .................................... SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE:-_3/16"=T-0" A4.2 BRICK LAP SIDING WT,PLATE STEEL ACCENTS GLASSSTOREFRONT V0DODACCENr LAMINATE PANELS WITH WOOD FINISH i rowland+broughton , \ architecture and urban design I," 2 ��/I 294..ropw n•. 39n 1,10. 105 IYI \ z .•P•n,w e1e11 a=30&373e sro.W.3473. 903.3.137 I Z I sTo.s44.3a91 9ro.3os.13Tsr I ___ _ Al10YWBLE EiEVATOROVFARUN. ELEVATOR OVERRUN I I 6 I T.O.HT.MAX CxnJleri.: 1 L___________ _ __ ___ _1____________ !SiRBCLAUSO�ASSOCIAiESIit 1 _ __— LO. F ism,i mM'exmm.men..i.. PAINTED METAL PLATE f 110 11 f d f 10 I f f f I I 4 PARAPET WITH METAL CAP I T.O.FIN.FL THREE f I 124-0' PETERSEN TEGL. ....... f KOLUMBA BRICK 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW r 4 4 APPLICATION �3 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD .F ,_. OUTREACH 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL T.O.FIN.FL LE1�T,,,rD DESIGN REVIEW '�• .�—��— — — 11a-0'• � RESUBMITTAL 1 .I< 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL I DESIGN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL 2 f 08.01.2012 GMQS I RESIDENTIAL AND APPLICATION COMMERCIALLOBBY 04.082013 FINAL CANOPY COMMERCIAL I HYMANavENDESIGN REVIEW UE I T.O.FIN.FL. LEVEL ONE 1 � I � i f I I I I t 601 EAST HYMAN I T.O.FlN.FL AVENUE 87 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION AA.3 3n&'-1'4 e ____..______..._. PROJECT NO: 2121340 - / - SHEET TRLE: 1 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION --- SCALE: 3/16"-1'-0— A4.3 �a BRICK LAP SIDING HATH PLATE STEEL ACCENTS GLASSSTOREFRONf- WOOD ACCENT - LAMINATE PANELS WITH.000 FINISH aT rowland+broughton O O architecture and urban b design lT'J O I� n .. .P e.'m 818 3377 pbka BD 05 I PeO..o B1en� aerN.r,ro Bozos 870.5=73 f 303.308.1373 v 870.SNJ4731 30!.300.1375 f I I 1 I I I ALLOWABLE ELEVATOROVERRUN I ——____ I —— _ It ELEVATOR OVERRUN __—_____—_______—_—_—______—� _—_______ __ — — STAT CtAUS01 ASSOCIATESIwc T.O.ROOF ��� .�I•«v.u..+ev••' PaNTEO METAL LAMINATE PANELS.------- PLATE WOOD FINISH } F71�- 4r LAMINATE PANEL 4 PARAPET W/METAL CAP LEVEL IN.FL E • o KKO UMBO BRICK leave: . _ . RSENTEOL ........._....._.........._............_............_................ ;. '��'%;,a 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL 4 DESIGN REVIEW 4 APPLICATION t �f 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH � T.O.FIN.FL 08.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL pp '.? �� BEVEL Two DESIGN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL 1 �- 07.032012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW 1 RESUBMITTAL 2 METAL CLAD EGRESS 08.01.2012 GMQS STAIR CANOPY APPLICATION NON-COMBUSTIBLE 04.08.2013 FINAL FENCE AT TRANSFORMER COMMERCIAL HUNTER AVENUE DESIGN REVIEW T.O.FIN.FL LEVEL ONE m I I I l 601 EAST HYMAN BA FISE - — MENT82'-0` J. AVENUE 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 111-1\PROP08ED SOUTH ELEVATION A4A 3N8'•i'.0' IT _ PROJECT N0: 21213.00 r SHEET TITLE PROPOSED FEXTERIOR E EVATIION SCALE: 3/16 =1,A„ - A4.4 Fpgp gS BRICK LAP SIDING WITH PLATE STEEL ACCENTS GLASS STOREFRONT W00DACCENT LAMINATE PANELS WITH WOOD FINISH rowland+broughton architecture and urban design 234 e.WpWm— 33n IAI:M,1W .Won,w 81511 80205 970'544"6' 13M, 970.544.3473 I .1376f 0 (D ....... co—hnW: 1174r la-v 34r 7-cr _ALLOWAEILEELEVfIIROVF RUN L T.O ROOF --—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- T.O.ROOF.'L- 1 04.20.2012 CONCEPTUAL DECK 92 DESIGN REVIEW I APPLICATION GUEST7-II 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD CLTER I OUTREACH LIVING DINING BEDROOM#1 \B #1 LL BEDROOM 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL ROOM F.P. ROOM DESIGN REVIEW KITCHEN TO.FIN.FL RE-SUBMITTAL I FT.O.FIN.FL 07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL L LFIR DESIGN REVIEW 124% RE-SUBMITTAL2 08.01.2012 GIVIOS APPLICATION 04.081013 FINAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL MENS DESIGN REVIEW T.O.FIN,FL COMMERCIAL E LEVEL T.O.FIN.FL, 43 0 t? COMMERCIAL OMMERCIA- T.O.RK FL LEVELONE T,O.FIN FL. IW4r T _ LEVEL ONE 67 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL HALLWAY MENS T.O.PIK FL BASfLn 1 T T.O.FIN.Fl BASEMENT ............... PRO ECT NO: 21213.00 EEII SHEET TITLE: SEC'nON APROPOSED "'6`'°V BUILDING SECTIONS SCALE: 3/16"..=V-0" ......................... A5.1 q-7 rowland+broughton architecture and urban design 234 s.hop—eve. 3377 bMk-N,106 np.n'.81611 d—,.80205 970.514.9006 v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.UMf 30I.MI.1375f Consull -,� STAN CLAUSCN ASSBCIATESmc W-7 I _ ....<...,. .<..<,,....<..,e.. I I bxmP�1+1 t w.s.Pwywm.<a.. 3'4' 2U.T vroirz —rz 4�' ttl.1r I I IALLOWABLE ELEVATOR OVERRUN I TO.H _ _ _—_ _—_—_—_______ _ _ _—_____ _ _—_ _ _ _ __J// 'r _ T.O.ROOF _ 135'-P M04.2cue: 0.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION 1 / \ GREEN ROOF DECK#11 / \ 05.30.2012 NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH -- - --- HALL 06.07.2012 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW ,Y;, ELEVATOR RE-SUBMITTAL LEVEL THREE07.03.2012 CONCEPTUAL 0' 124'- DESIGN REVIEW RE-SUBMITTAL 2 08.01.2012 GMOS APPLICATION I \ \ \ ¢ 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL LOBBY COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW IT.O.FIN.FL till _ LEVEL TWO 113'-17 § I 1 1 COMMERCIAL / \ COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL \ / LOBBY T.O.FIN.FL —� LEVEL ONE ._- 1 1 _ I 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE HALLWAY I 4 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,CO 81611 t.., / -- COMMERCIAL / 1 T.O. IN,FL BASEMENT ' —I I L -771 it .. JI �I �I PROJECT NO: 21213.00 SECTION C A52 314.1'0 SHEET TITLE: PROPOSED BUILDING t SECTIONS SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" A5.2 t8 rV p O n rowland+broughton Y 2Uo.ectun3 and urban design 234..'.slel 3377 r,Po8108 0.n 81811 tl.rn.3 80208 8705",3473 f 303.308.375 f 870.SM.3Q3f 303.308.13757 I I I I I I C011.l�li.: STAp C1dUSQN ASSRFOFSIgc. p w '.1,u.W t4wvY wv >'sisw e o e e r c r o r r o P P O°0 O°0 0 O V a h.ue: 04.08.2013 FINAL -------- --------- --------� COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW i o1 FI I �! r P I o F1 o F1 p 0 i F1 I F1 a I I r-1 I I I I I I I I r I r c P O V nu °0 o - 3 FT I I Ft Ft `J I _ � 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE I I 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE I I ASPEN,CO 81611 ---------------- I I F1 PROJECT NO: SII 21213.00 I I I I I I I SHEET ME PROPOSED A a ^ F G FIRST LEVEL C7 RCP SCALE: 3116'=1'-0" 2 2 A3.1 �x !8 rowland+broughton e c E F O 2uaihapk�.and u33n�k.�gM 970. 70.n,co 81511 tlern3., .13205 o 970.500.9005 v 303.308.375 f 9]0.506.3473! 303.305.13751 I I I I I I I Conwbrb: -�1 aI,�N c AUfiON AS&NCt�iEBlaa o<, ! < �ey l v l' �S^/`j Sx;t'J/L ♦ i^ '".sr ji4 04.08.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL _ ✓�i�� �=� _____��.- -=7 �3 �"4 -+ DESIGN REVIEW I j I I LIE I I I r` r s1 Fl Fl f 601 EAST HYMAN 91 „ _ �1 AVENUE I I �J -O I 601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 3t ASPEN,CO 81611 i Fl i I I i I I � iii I \J �---- -------------I__------------------------------------- PROJECT NO: 21213.00 SHEET TITLE: I I I I I I I PROPOSED # THIRD LEVEL t a RCP k SCALE: 3/16"=1'-D" A3.3 !8 0 HALO 40 DESCRIPTION - H4 LED DOWNLIGHT TRIMS Halo H4 LED family consists of 4" recessed downlights with EL4 • Series LED Light Engines and TL4 andTLS4 Series LEDTrims F1 • designed for installation in H4 LED series housings with integral LED dimmable drivers.Halo LED Downlight Trims are offered in . open and lensed baffles and reflectors;and wet location shower rated models.TL4 andTLS4 Series LEDTrims are compatible with EL4058x downlight LED light engines. Halo LED offers high quality, fit,finish,and performance in an energy-efficient,high-efficacy downlight. Ali, . SPECIFICATION FEATURES MECHANICAL FEATURES • Can be used to meet State Baffles and Reflectors Superior optical design of California Title 24 and • e Precision formed aluminum Provides high lumen output, International Energy • Reflector Finishes offered in smooth beam distribution,and Conservation Code-IECC High White,Specular Clear,Haze, good visual comfort Efficacy requirements when Specular Black,Satin Nickel, • Precision design and materials used with designated LED Light and Tuscan Bronze for a high-quality fit and finish Engines* • Baffle Finishes offered in White • Multiple trim options allow and Black Halo H4 LED recessed *Refer to compliance matrix downlights to be used in a wide Warrant Trim Rings range of interior spaces v H4 LED • Durable die-cast aluminum • High-quality standard and Cooper Lighting provides a three Downlight • Precision keyed slots designed year limited warranty on Halo Y 9 plated finishes to lock with matching keyed • Soliteo lensed trims offer LED Luminaires which includes Trims bosses in H4 LED Light Engine high-clarity glass for high- the LED Recessed Housing, LED • Works with LED Light Engine's lumen transmission along Light Engine,and LED trims. TL4xx andTLS4xx ' heat sink to provide further with a subtle diffusion of source (Subject to all of the limitations Series thermal conduction away from brightness set forth in Cooper Lighting Terms • the LED Solite and Frost Glass Lensed and Conditions of sale. Refer to • Standard finishes offered in models are ULJcUL listed www.cooperlighting.com.) 4-Inch LEDTrims • White, Black,Satin Nickel,and for Wet Location,protected Tuscan Bronze. ceilings,and are IP66 Ingress • Optional,thin profile designer Protection rated for dust and • trim rings offered in White, water FOR USE WITH EL458xx Black,Satin Nickel,Tuscan • Polymer shower trim features . Bronze,and Polished Chrome a non-electrically conductive LED LIGHT ENGINES finishes. plastic"dead front': AND • • Thin profile designer trim One piece baffle and ring,and rings provide subtle ceiling lens are formed from plastics H455, H456 SERIES 4" appearance. -special polymers to meet LED HOUSINGS. Thickness dimensions: Halo performance and quality • 0.120"at OD and 0.180"at ID. standards. • H4 LED trims offer ENERGY Complete fixture • STARS Qualification when Compatible with H4 consists of H455 used with designated Halo H4 LED Light Engines LED Light Engines* or H456 Series LED Model Color Housing, EL4058xx Temperature Series Light Engine and 27000K.— TL4 Series LED trim. EL405827 2700°K High Efficacy LED • 30T EL405830 3000°K 3500°K.�M. IECC C " IECC EL405835 3500°K Qualified&Compliant as designated with LED Light 40OOoK Engine and Trim. Refer to LED Compliance Matrix and Light • Engine Specifications. EL405840 4000°K / ADV110425 COOPER Lighting rev aiaizoii • H4 LED Downlight Trims • TL4 and TLS4 Series • H4 LED DOWNLIGHT SERIES - LED TRIMS SQUARE SOLITEe REGRESSED LENS BAFFLE TRIMS • Wet Location Listed For Shower Applications -nhs" ,-1111 s- [43mm] [43mm] 3-318" I :I I 3-318" [- -[86 mm]—"I [ [86 mm]--�] 5-1164- 5-1164' [129mm] L [129mm] TLS408WHWB TLS408WHBB • Square Baffle Trim with Solitee Regressed Lens, Square Baffle Trim with Solite® Regressed Lens, r��{1/�yj6y���f„I���(V�[yit� pQ������������������■■��■� Black Baffle, White Ring ■ 1-11/16- � ,-ttlt� [43mm] ■ [43mm] Is 3-318" I I- 3-318" f [86 mm] [86 mm]�1 5-1164" 5-1164" •� [129mm] ■ [129mm] TLS408SNBB TLS408TBZBB Square Baffle Trim with Solitee Regressed Lens, . Square Baffle Trim with Solitee Regressed Lens, Black Baffle, Satin Nickel Ring Black Baffle, Tuscan Bronze Ring • WALL WASH TRIMS 4 t�l�Nl� f� II T 7�"""�ss'•: 1 1-11116' • [4'3"m�m] T. [4'3"mmm] 3-318' I I I 3-318" [�[86 mm]---j [^[86 mm]--{ 5-1164 5-1164' • [129mm] [129mml TL409WW TL409WHWW Wall Wash Downlight - Semi-Specular Clear Wall Wash Downlight - White Reflector with Reflector with Specular Wall Wash Optic, Specular Wall Wash Optic, Diffusing Lens and Diffusing Lens and White Ring White Ring POLYMER SHOWER TRIM n 1-n176" [43mm] 3-318" • I` [86 mm] '1 5-1164" • [129mm] TL422PS One-piece White Polymer Baffle and Ring, and Regressed Prismatic Polymer Lens. Shower Trim front is Non-Electrically • Conductive with "Dead-Front" Polymer Material. 00 . COOPER Lighting www.cooperlighting.com H4 LED Downlight Trims TL4 and TLS4 Series H4 LED DOWNLIGHT SERIES – LED TRIMS • OPEN REFLECTOR AND BAFFLE TRIMS p [43mm) -L [43MMI T 9, I L'[129mm)'] 3-318" I 1±[ 129mml —j 3-3/8' [66 mm] [86 mm]—'1 • 5-7/64" 5-1164" • TL400SC TL400H Specular Clear Reflector, White Ring Haze Reflector, White Ring • • [43mm] "u [43mm] 3-3/8" T3-3/8' [86 mm)�'l f�[86 mml " 5-,164" [129m729mm) [729mm] TL400WH TL400SBK White Reflector, White Ring Specular Black Reflector, White Ring s � � • [43mTm) 77' 143mTm] T7�' I L'[129mm]'] 3-3/8' I I 3-3/8" [86 MMI 186 mml . " L [129m729mm) • TL400SN TL40OTBZ Satin Nickel Reflector, Satin Nickel Ring Tuscan Bronze Reflector,Tuscan Bronze Ring • 1-11/16" 1-1,/,6" [43mm] [43mm] • I 3-318" I I 3-318" • 5-1/64" 5-1164" T-L [729mm] L [129mml TL401WB TL401BB • White Baffle, White Ring Black Baffle, White Ring 00 COOPER Lighting • www.cooperlighting.com • • H4 LED Downlight Trims • TL4 and TLS4 Series H4 LED DOWNL16HT SERIES — LED TRIMS S REFLECTOR AND BAFFLE TRIMS WITH SOLITE® REGRESSED LENS • Wet Location Listed For Shower Applications • 1-11116' 1-11116" [43mm] [43mm] Ili�KiVli�rwxti � T • 13-3/8' I I 3-318' 7 • [86 mm]—�-[ ,�„.,. [�—186 mm] 5-1164" 5-1164' . 1129mm] 1129mm] . TL402SCS TL402HS Specular Clear Reflector with Solite@) Regressed Haze Reflector with Solite@) Lens, White Ring Lens, White Ring • 1-11/16' 1-11116' [43mm] i��;p �I [43mm] 'M 3-3/8' I i T I 3-3/8' T-1 ....-<..W.,__........�,� .,. [86 mm]"1 I"_[86 mm] •. 129m" ' [729mm] [129m129mm] • TL402WHS TL402SBKS White Reflector with Solite@) Lens, White Ring Specular Black Reflector with Solite@) Lens, • White Ring • 1-11/116' t-111116" [43mm] [43mm] T_L3-3/6" I I 3-3/8' [---'[86 mm]---[ [^[86 mm] 5-1/64" 5-1/64' ]729mm] [129mm] �- TL402SNS TL402TBZS Satin Nickel Reflector with Solite@) Lens , Satin Tuscan Bronze Reflector with Solite@) Lens, • Nickel Ring Tuscan Bronze Ring 1-11/16- ® p [43mm] [43mTm] LT • '• I 3-318- I I Li 3-31rF`[86 mm]'1 [86 mmj_ I 5-1/64" 5-1/64" [129mm] [129mm] TL403WBS TL403BBS • White Baffle with Solite@) Lens, White Ring Black Baffle with Solite@) Lens, White Ring TRM400 Designer Trim Rings • Optional accessory • Die-cast trim ring • Thin Profile provides subtle ceiling appearance • (.120" at OD and .180 at ID) • TRM40OTBZ Tuscan Bronze TRM400BK Black TRM400SN Satin Nickel TRM40OPC Polished Chrome • TRM400WH White C Lighting • ..coopedighting.com H4 LED Trims Lumen and Energy Code Summary H4 LED Downlight Collection EL405827 EL405830 EL405835 EL405840 2700°K 3000°K 3500°K 4000°K N v N Cnf'- Z U) c0U Z VJ _� Z (n c6 Z Cn cc Trim Type Trim Model W w _ w ,, � w c U � c w � 'c U J c w cc: O Cr _O _ G W Z O J Z J Z to J Z LU W U W U W U w U Open Specular Reflector TL400SC 603 X X 655 X X X 686 X X X 700 X X X Open Haze Reflector TL400H 566 X X 619 X X X 653 X X X 667 X X X Open White Reflector TL400WH 551 X X 606 X X X 636 X X X 653 X X X Open White Baffle TL401 WB 539 X X 593. X X X 623 X X X 639 X X X Solite®Lens Specular Clear Reflector TL402SCS 535 584 X X X 613 X X X 624 X X X Solitee Lens Haze Reflector TL402HS 534 575 X X X 613 X X X 615 X X X Solite®Lens White Reflector TL402WHS 539 590 X X X 630 X X X 629 X X X Solite®Lens White Baffle TL403WBS 536 584 X X X 624 X X X 625 X X X Open Specular Black Reflector TL400SBK 373 390 392 408 Open Satin Nickel Reflector TL400SN 455 475 480 496 X Open Tuscan Bronze Reflector TL40OTBZ 414 434 434 451 Open Black Baffle TL401 BB 368 383 388 403 Solite®Lens Specular Black Reflector TL402SBKS 497 515 X 521 X 531 X Solite®Lens Satin Nickel Reflector TL402SNS 508 527 X 533 X 544 X Solite®Lens Tuscan Bronze Reflector TL402TBZS 484 505 X 504 X 519 X Solite®Lens Black Baffle TL403BBS 495 515 X 520 X 531 X Square Baffle Trim,Solite®Lens,White Ring and White Baffle TLS408WHWB 531 568 X X 596 X X 625 X X Square Baffle Trim,Solite®Lens,White Ring and Black Baffle TLS408WHBB 502 535 554 591 Square Baffle Trim,Solite®Lens,Satin Nickel Ring and Black Baffle TLS408SNBB 502 535 554 591 Square Baffle Trim,Solite®Lens,Tuscan Bronze Ring and Black Baffle TLS408TBZBB 502 535 554 591 Wall Wash,Semi-Specular Reflector,and White Ring TL409WW 538 572 X X 604 X X 633 X. X Wall Wash,White Reflector,and White Ring TL409WHWW 530 564 X X 596 X X 624 X X Polymer Lensed Shower Trim,White Baffle and Ring ITL422PS 568 605 x x 638 x x 1 669 x x = a � r (1)Downlight trims are tested with designated LED Light Engines in accordance with IES Photometric Measurement Standards A v m v (2)Halo is committed to providing the latest in qualification testing to ENERGY STARO standards.As an ENERGY STARO Partner,Cooper Lighting adhers to the stringent standards of ENERGY STARO and maintains the a highest level of compliance qualification. = (3)California Title 24,registered with State of California Appliance Database under High Efficacy LED. a s (4)International Energy Conservation Code m ; m3 a m H4 LED Downlight Trims TL4 and TLSO Series PHOTOMETRY Wall Wash,Semi-Specular Clear Candela/M') De Degrees Candelak. Reflector,Specular Wall Wash Optic (Average 0 p pVertical 2 �fR 3' • TL409WW Degrees Avg.O° a Luminance 0 278 �� 1' 15.6 15.8 15.6 "`.� 1' 13.8 9.0 13.8 Spacing Criteria=1.24 45 35203 15 255 270 z za.s 27.6 24.6 2' 20.2 20.7 20.2 • Lumens per Watt=42.02 LpW 55 32442 25 238 3' 15.0 16.2 15.0 3' 12.6 13.6 12.6 65 18662 4' 8.9 9.6 8.9 - 4' 7.7 8.5 7.7 • TesYNo.P21178 75 6666 35 220 Test Model:EL405830(3000K LED light engine) 85 2828 45 202 5' 5.6 5.9 5.6 5' S.0 5.4 5.0 • aC x 55 151 6' 3.6 3.8 3.6 6' 3.3 3.6 3.3 r 1 65 64 7' 2.5 2.5 2.5 T 2.3 2.4 2.3 90° 75 14 k 8' 1.7 1.8 1.7 c - 8' 1.6 1.7 1.6 • 85 2 9' 1.3 - 1.3 1.3 9' 1.2 1.3 1.2 80° 90 0 _ 10' 1.0 1.0 1.0 10' os os os 70° • 60° • 50° Zone Lumens %Lam %Fixture Color Temperature as tested:3000°K • 0-30 217 N/A 61.1 Color Temperature 2700°K 3000°K 3500°K 4000°K 40° 0-40 347 N/A 84.7 Multiplier 0.9397 1.0000 1.0553 1.1055 • 30° 0-60 534 N/A 98.3 Representative photometric test reports are as illustrated in combination 0-90 576 N/A 100 with Halo H4 LED Light Engines in 3000'K color temperature. 0° 10' 20° For relative lumen values with other color temperatures options in Halo • LED use the appropriate multiplier. • Square Baffle Trim with Solite® •`'" � � ' • ' =' - Regressed Lens-TLS408WHWB (Average Candela/M') Degrees Candela Distance to Initial Nadir Beam • Degrees Avg.O° Vertical Illuminated Foot Candles Diameter(ft) Spacing Criteria=0.62 Luminance 0 1007 Plane p g 45 5925 5 954 5,6- 33 5.8 Lumens per Watt=41.4 LpW 55 2578 15 650 7"0" 21 7.4 • Test No.P21157 65 2041 25 353 8'0- 16 8.4 Test Model:EL405830(3000K LED light engine) 75 1904 35 136 9"0"" 12 9.5 • 85 1414 45 34 10"0- 10 10.6 55 12 90° 65 7 • 75 4 80° 85 1 • 252 90 0 U300 ° • 504 Zone Lumens %Lam %Fixture Color Temperature as tested:3000°K 0-30 428 N/A 75.4 Color Temperature 2700°K 3000°K 3500°K 4000°K 0-40 516 N/A 90.8 Multiplier 0.8905 0.9476 1.0000 1.0476 • 7550-60 556 N/A 97.8 Representative photometric test reports are as illustrated in combination • 0-90 568 N/A 100 with Halo H4 LED Light Engines in 3000°K color temperature. For relative lumen values with other color temperatures options in Halo 10070° 10° LED use the appropriate multiplier. Specular Clear,Open • TL400SC (Average Candela/M') Degrees Candela Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Degrees Avg.0° Vertical Illuminated Foot Candles Diameter(ft) • Spacing Criteria=1.3 Luminance 0 349 Plane p 0 45 19879 5 331 5"6" 12 10.3 • Lumens per Watt=48.54 LpW 55 1290 15 399 7"0' 7 13.1 Test No.P20074 65 1167 25 433 8'0" 6 15.0 Test Model:EL405835(3500K LED module) 75 953 35 363 9,0.. 4 16.9 45 114 10"0" 4 18.8 Y W 85 1415 • �E�•� �� J'.����1 55 6 90' 65 4 75 2 85 1 75* 90 0 • 140 • 60I 4 t 'lslk :I Zone Lumens %Lam %Fixture Color Temperature as tested:3500°K • 280 0-30 346 N/A 50.5 Color Temperature 2700°K 3000°K 3500°K 4000°K 45° 0-40 573 N/A 83.6 Multiplier 0.8905 0.9476 1.0000 1.0476 • 0-60 679 N/A 99.0 Representative photometric test reports are as illustrated for downlighting 0-90 686 N/A 100 include open and lensed trims in combination with Halo H4 LED Light Engines in 3500°K color temperature. • 420 For relative lumen values with other color temperatures options in Halo 0' 15' 30' LED use the appropriate multiplier. Tested in accordance with IES LM-79 Photometric Measurement Standards.Tests represent relative SSL fixture performance. • Field results may vary. • • H4 LED Downlight Trims wTI-4 and TLS4 Series • PHOTOMETRY w White Baffle,Solite Lens TL403WBS (Average Candela/M') Degrees Candela i Distance to Initial Nadir Beam • Degrees Avg.0° Vertical Illuminated Foot Candles Diameter Ift) Spacing Criteria=0.6 Luminance 0 753 Plane P 9 5 698 5"6" 25 7.1 Lumens per Watt=44.27 LpW 45 18309 9 55 15 464 T 0" 15 9.0 • Test No.P20081 65 5543 25 317 8"0" 12 10.3 Test Model:EL405M5(3500K LED module) 75 4288 35 234 9'0" 9 11.6 • _ ar 85 2829 45 705 10"0" 8 12.9 55 90• 65 19 w 75 9 85 2 • 75 90 0 300 w 60' 600 Zone Lumens %Lam %Fixture Color Temperature as tested:3500°K • 45 0-30 341 N/A 54.6 Color Temperature I 2700°K I 3000°K I 3500°K I 4000°K 0-40 487 N/A 78.0 Multiplier 1 0.8905 1 0.9476 1 1.0000 1 1.0476 0-60 594 N/A 95.1 Representative photometric test reports areas illustrated for downlighting 0-90 624 N/A 100 include open and lensed trims in combination with Halo H4 LED Light Engines 900in 3500°K color temperature. I t • 0' 15' 30' For relative lumen values with other color temperatures options in Halo LED use the appropriate multiplier. w White Baffle,Open TL401WB (Average Candela/M') Degrees Candela Distance to Initial Nadir Beam w Degrees Avg.0 Vertical Illuminated Foot Candles Diameter(ft) Spacing Criteria=1.3 Luminance 0 332 Plane w P 9 Lumens per Watt 44.17 LpW 45 15868 5 322 5"6"" 11 10.1 = 55 10318 15 308 7"0" 7 12.9 • Test No.P20077 65 11087 25 293 8"0"" 5 14.8 Test Model:EL405835 13500K LED module) 75 9528 35 276 9'0- 4 16.6' • 85 7074 45 91 10"0" 3 18.4 m 55 48 90• 65 38 • 75 20 85 5 • 75' 90 0 120 • 60' 240 Zone Lumens %Lam %Fixture Color Temperature as tested:3500°K 0-30 254 N/A 40.7 Color Temperature 2700°K 3000°K 3500°K 4000°K 45' 0-40 427 N/A 68.5 Multiplier 0.8905 0.9476 1.0000 1.0476 • 0-60 558 N/A 89.7 Representative photometric test reports areas illustrated for downlighting 0-90 623 N/A 100 include open and lensed trims in combination with Halo H4 LED Light Engines 360 in 3500°K color temperature. • 0' 15 30' For relative lumen values with other color temperatures options in Halo LED use the appropriate multiplier. w Specular Clear,Solite Lens • TL402SCS (Average Candela/M') Degrees Candela Distance to Initial Nadir Beam Degrees Avg.00 Vertical Illuminated Foot Candles Diameter(ft) Spacing Criteria=0.7 Luminance 0 751 Plane P 9 45 15694 5 702 5"6"" 25 7.1 Lumens per Watt=43.53 LpW 55 2795 15 516 7"0" 15 9.0 • Test No.P20078 65 2042 25 358 8,0- 12 10.3 Test Model:EL405835(3500K LED module) 75 953 35 231 9,0- 9 11.6 85 1415 45 90 10"0"" 8 12.9 r 1� "O 55 13 90• 65 7 75 2 85 1 75' 90 0 • 300 60' • 600Zone Lumens %Lam %fixture Color Temperature as tested:3500°K 45' 0-30 375 N/A 61.1 Color Temperature 2700°K 3000°K 3500°K 4000°K • 0-40 519 N/A 84.7 Multiplier 0.8905 0.9476 1.0000 1.0476 0-60 603 N/A 98.3 Representative photometric test reports are as illustrated for downlighting 0-90 613 N/A 100 include open and lensed trims in combination with Halo H4 LED Light Engines • 900 R1 in 3500'K color temperature. o' 15' 30' For relative lumen values with other color temperatures options in Halo • LED use the appropriate multiplier. • Tested in accordance with IES LM-79 Photometric Measurement Standards.Tests represent relative SSL fixture performance. Field results may vary. • • - H4 LED Downlight Trims TL4 and TLS4 Series • ORDERING INFORMATION SAMPLE NUMBER: ELSG40584OTBZ • Complete unit includes H4 LED housing, light engine, and trim, ordered separately Housing: Refer to housing specification sheets for selection and details. Light Engine: H4 LED Downlight Light Engines EL4058x Series are compatible with this complete collection of H4 LED Downlight Trims. (Note H4 LED Adjustable Gimbals are available. The H4 Round and Square Gimbals feature a combined trim and light engine, • and are not compatible with H4 LED downlight trims. Refer to Adjustable Gimbal Light Engine specification sheets for details.) H4 LED Downlight Trims • . TLS408WHWB=Square Baffle Trim,Solite®Lens,White Ring with White Baffle Accessories • TLS408WHBB=Square Baffle Trim, Solite°Lens,White Ring with Black Baffle Designer Trim Rings,Thin Profile TLS408SNBB=Square Baffle Trim, Solite°Lens,Satin Nickel Ring with Black Baffle (Compatible with all round H4 LED TL4x trims, TLS408TBZBB=Square Baffle Trim, Solite®Lens,Tuscan Bronze Ring with Black Baffle not compatible with TLS4x square trims) • TL409WW=Wall Wash,Semi-Specular Clear Reflector with White Ring TRM400WH=White,die-cast trim ring TL409WHWW=Wall Wash,White Reflector with White Ring TRM400BK=Black,die-cast trim ring • TRM400SN=Satin Nickel,die-cast trim ring TL422PS=Polymer Baffle&Regressed Lens Shower Trim,White Baffle&Ring TRM400TBZ=Tuscan Bronze,die-cast trim ring TL400SC=Specular Clear Reflector,White Ring TRM400PC=Polished Chrome,die-cast trim ring • TL400H=Haze Reflector,White Ring TL400WH=White Reflector,White Ring • TL400SN=Satin Nickel Reflector,Satin Nickel Ring TL400TBZ=Tuscan Bronze Reflector,Tuscan Bronze Ring TL.400SBK=Specular Black Reflector,White Ring • TL401WB=White Baffle,White Ring TL401BB=Black Baffle,White Ring • TL402SCS=Specular Clear Reflector,Solite®Lens,White Ring TL402HS=Haze Reflector,Solite°Lens,White Ring • TL402WHS=White Reflector,Solitem Lens,White Ring TL402SNS=Satin Nickel Reflector,Solite®Lens,Satin Nickel Ring TL402TBZS=Tuscan Bronze Reflector,Solite®Lens,Tuscan Bronze Ring • TL402SBKS=Specular Black Reflector,Solite®Lens,White Ring TL403WBS=White Baffle,Solite°Lens,White Ring • TL403BBS=Black Baffle,Solite®Lens,White Ring • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • - SOI@eO is a registered trademark of AGC Flat Glass North America • Note:Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. • ® Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com COOPER Lighting Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City,GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770 486.4801 • www.cooperlighting.com Cooper Lighting 5925 McLaughlin Rd.Mississauga,Ontario,Canada L5R 1 B8 905.507.4000 FAX 905.568.7049 HALO" • DESCRIPTION The H9951CAT is a dedicated LED small aperture IC AIR-TITETM housing for use with Halo RL4 Series LED modules.It is designed • , - F1 • for use in insulated ceilings where it will be in direct contact with insulation*.It is an AIR-TITET" housing designed to prevent air flow between occupied spaces and unconditioned areas. • DESIGN FEATURES x • Housings - Accommodates the following Labels 6 $ • Double wall aluminum standard non-metallic sheathed • UL/cUL Listed 1598 Luminaire y construction helps dissipate heat. cable sizes: • UL/cUL Listed for Damp Location • The inner housing can be adjusted (US)#14/2,#14/3,#12/2,#12/3 • UL/cUL Listed for Wet Location, • in the plaster frame to compensate (Canada)#14/2,#14/3,#12/2 with select trims z- k for different ceiling materials. • • "Quick Connect"Connectors UL/cUL listed for Feed Through• Designed for insulated ceilings • UL/cUL listed for Direct Contact in direct contact with insulation*. Three quick connect wiring • (May also be installed in connectors included. with insulation and combustible non-insulated ceilings.) t . material* GOT NAIL Pass-N-Thru • Plaster Frame Bar Hangers Compliance • Galvanized steel die-formed • Pre-installed nail easily installs • Use with designated LED light H9951CAT • construction. in regular lumber,engineered engines and trims for ENERGY • The inner housing can be removed lumber and laminated beams. STAR@ qualification. • from plaster frame to provide • Safety and guidance system • Can be used for State of California access to the junction box. prevents snagging,ensures Title 24 high efficacy compliance 4-Inch New Construction . Plaster frame features include: smooth straight nail penetration with designated LED light engines Insulated Ceiling AIR-TITETTM Patented regressed locking and allows bar hangers to be easily and trims. Recessed Housing • screw positioned for securing removed if necessary. Can be used for International For Halo LED Module . hanger bars from below the • Automatic levelling flange aligns Energy Conservation Code(IECC) RL4 Series ceiling. the housing and lets you hold the high efficacy compliance with • Cutouts for easily crimping hanger housing in place with one hand designated LED light engines High Efficacy LED Housing bars in position. while driving nails. and trims. • AIR-TITE aperture gasket is • Housing can be positioned at any Refer to H4 LED Light Engine and pre-installed. point within 24"joist span. Trim specification sheets online • HALO identity embossed on • Pass-N-Thru TM feature allows bar for compliance information. FOR USE IN plaster frame hangers to be shortened without Qualification INSULATED CEILINGS • removing from plaster frame. IC and AIR-TITETM 0 Positioned °"Junction Box . Score lines allow"tool-less" Certified under ASTM-E283 and FOR DIRECT CONTACT • Positioned to accommodate• straight conduit runs shortening for 12"joists. listed UL/cUL 1598.May be used WITH INSULATION* • Seven 1/2"trade size conduit • Integral T-bar clip snaps onto to meet insulated ceiling*and • knockouts with true pry-out slots T-bars-no additional clips restricted air-flow requirements ALSO SUITABLE FOR required such as: NON-IC CEILINGS • Slide-N-Side wire traps allow • Washington State Energy Code non-metallic sheathed cable to be LED Module Connection • installed without tools and without Halo LED RL4 Series modules simply • International Energy Conservation removing knockouts. install with a plug-in 120V line volt- Code(IECC) . Accepts a wide range of non- age wiring connector(UL and CSA • New York State Energy metallic(type NM)sheathed Listed Luminaire Disconnect).This Conservation Construction Code cables-the standard cablenon-screw-base LED connection (NY-ECCC) types preserves the high efficacy rating of • State of California Title 24 used in lighting in both U.S.and the luminaire(see also LED Module "Recessed Luminaires in Insulated • Canada. specifications). Ceilings." Allows wiring connections to be • made outside the junction box Warranty -• Simply insert the cable directly into Cooper Lighting provides a five year limited warranty on Halo RL4 LED *Not to be used in direct contact the trap after connections are Luminaires which includes the LED . with spray foam insulation. made • Recessed Housing,and LED module. • DIMENSIONS �^��• �^^•^^^� ENERGY IECC • STAR® N19N Hricaq �eiv4M CwPP1a,cP • cm e:�amii. W$EC° • 5-1/2 inch (140 mm) 8-1/2 inch t" • ° ° (216 mm) • - _°_ Qualified and compliant with D ° ° D 1/2 inch select LED modules.Refer i O 7777 to ENERGY STAR®Qualified (13 mm) -Q� Products List and CEC(T24) • • I (111 mm)inch Appliance Database for i-- (111 Ceiling opening l listings. 00 COOPER:Lighting r• (133 mm) ADV120463 • www.000perlighting.com December 18,2012 4:36 PM • • HAL.O® H9951CAT • ORDERING INFORMATION • SAMPLE NUMBER: H9951CAT - RL406830WH • Complete unit includes Halo H995 series housing and RL4 LED. Housing and RL4 LED to be ordered separately. Housing • . H995=4"LED Housing with ICAT=4"Dedicated LED Insulated Ceiling,AIR-TITE New Construction Housing dedicated LED luminaire' • connector(high efficacy compliant) • RL4 LED Module* • • RL406=4"LED Retrofit Module, 8=80 CRI 30=3000°K WH=White Baffle and Trim Ring • Dimmable,120V SN= Satin Nickel Baffle and Trim Ring • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • `Refer to LED module specication sheet for additional information. ® Note:Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. COOPER Lighting Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com • www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City,GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770 486.4801 Cooper Lighting 5925 McLaughlin Rd.Mississauga,Ontario,Canada L5R 1 B8 905.507.4000 FAX 905.568.7049 • • Manufacturer: LIGMAN Specified Catalog#: U40581-10W-120V-06 S1 Llfl SPECIFICATION PROJECT � DATE • � .�M QUANT . ."" C� E ."� � A�� ��... �.m.� IM.SultAle hat Yi+st lUXvions U40581 Rado S recessed:fxat on light LECA Product Type • A ran ref retangular and 5quamm4 riKesspd luminaires,vsr'ath an • indirect olmical system,of# ng high vandal r istance.UiftNefir i ar atd ar apfiti aiican,A recomedtfD%*1h*ndiettN t glare_Light is d4ect to ttw gnauntt p vAd Amminoetn whom it is needed and minimizing light sprll. -- Low copw comerrt dicast aluminum houskV with s htgt coffosloe • rsi tance.Staintms 50konr rubor r ga0M tend cratrlhemd glass d'rffusear.Doutrie cable entry.Hjxs prig is tteined witf+ar c4ernkal chmmatimd peoiection beforepowder coatrrq.ensuring hqK 7 .q corrasvion r istanco.lnleqral conv al tear,Anodized high purity - aluminum relifttar, • � + • „l cal't,ma ' ' £ '{,.' +. LWI. ttt mi • E t 1 h • Lamp • „"`4 ;tar tabsr4 L.�^�#tY�;3D�€9aY�"?�w�,� ,'Ys3�.t�.sSC t7A~ :i%S�,ha la !a 4.rem�R*�t?xF�'e' Color,�i c s Oe I • Cl Q?= .Kts-M Q01 r 0 til• Daric ... 7U3 0 05, tr s v- l 6 0 0,',Cwt -Rwt. • 13 WRrf,rve-sAt fA 14 rote, • rtr�« fiactrx�rlr etrrr[ �az 0 • tai; rkraa , m o._, r r.oox.a�as xr " seg, #, a� e4ript �er »3.:�z regret aau +rec x�ae7rre�e +a + a�ar•��::w • Issue: VE PROGRESS REVISION THE GANT RENOVATION Date: 22-Feb-13 HE GANT RENOVATION, ASPEN COLORAD(Project#: DV12122 • 10055 W.43rd Ave.Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 PH:(303)421.6655 Type: L3 is ttai a www.me-engineers.com Attachment 9 • • • RESOLUTION NO.19 • (SERIES OF 2012) . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING C0171viISSION APPROVING A CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN FOR VICTORIAN SQUARE • CONDOMINIUMS, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 601 E. HYM.AN AVE, CITY OF ASPEN,PITKIN COUNTY,COLORADO Parcel ID: • 2737-182-250-31,.2737182 ZSO-28;2737-182-250-30,2737-182-258-01, 2737-182-250-27,27J7-182-250-32,2737-182-2St1-33,2737-182-250-29 • WHEREAS,the Community Development Department received an application from the Victorian Square, LLC (Applicant), represented by Stan Clauson of Stan Clauson Associates, Inc., requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of a Conceptual • Commercial Design for Nixed Use development at Victorian Square;and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26,412 of the land Use Code, commercial design review approval may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a duly noticed • public hearing;and, • WHEREAS,during a regular meeting.on June 19,2012,and a continued public hearing on July 3rd,2012,the Planning and Zoning;Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to • consider the project and recommended approval of the conceptual commercial design with conditions;and, • WHEREAS,upon call-up review of the project by City Council,during a regular public hearing on August 27,2012,City Council chose to remand the project back to the Planning and • Zoning Commission with direction to re-examine the amount of public amenity space round on- site; WHEREAS,at their regular meeting on October 16,2012,during a duly noticed public • hearing,the Commission considered City Council's request to re-examine and memorialize the amount of public amenity space found on the subject parcel, and found that the development review standards for Conceptual Commercial Design Review have been met,as long;as certain conditions are implemented,by a vote of three to one(3-1): NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Conceptual Commercial Design Review,pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in • Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, for the Victorian Square building, subject to the • conditions listed in Section 1 below. • Section 1: . The approval is subject to the following conditions: . 1. The Final Commercial Design Review application shall reflect and demonstrate compliance with the findings of the Commission. • 2. The Final Commeicial Design Review application shall include: • • page i aro • • • • • • • a. An application for final Commercial Design Review and the proposed development is further subject to Final Commercial Design Review, GMQS Allotment, and Subdivision. A pre-application conference with a member of the Community • Development Department is required prior to submitting an application. • b. Delineation of all dimensional provisions of the development. . c. A proposed subdivision plat. 3. Approval of the Conceptual Commercial Design does not preclude meeting other requirements of the Municipal Code,such as Engineering and Parks standards. Drawings • illustrating tate Conceptual Commercial Design Review are attached as exhibits to this Resolution. • Section 2:Public Amenity Space The approved public amenity space shall comprise a total of no less than 562.50 sf(12.5%)of . the total parcel, with the cantilevered upper floors on the Hyman Ave fayade extending to no more than 3'beyond the first floor of the building. The public amenity will be in the form of an • enhanced public walkway that will wrap around Hyman Ave, to blunter St. This space will include the addition of street trees and other landscaping,as well as bench scaling. • Section 3:Building • The final design shall meet adopted building codes and requirements if`and when a building • permit is submitted. • Section 4:Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal • Code, Title 21, Title 28 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. A construction management plan must be submitted in conjunction . with the building permit application. A completed drainage report/plan as outlined in the Urban Runoff Management Plan shall be submitted and approved prior to Building Permit issuance. This major project is subject to the fee in lieu requirement of Section 2.12.140 of the Aspen . Municipal Code. • Section 5:Parks Landscaping in the public right-of-may will be subject to landscaping in the right-of-way requirement,Chapter 21.20,of the Municipal Code. There shall be no plantings within the City • right-of-way which are not approved by the City Parks and Engineering departments. Per Municipal Code 13.20, an approved tree Permit will be required prior to any tree removal or • development within the drip line of the tree. All tree permits must be approved prior to approval of building permits. Parks will approve the final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal . permit based on landscape estimates. section 6:Fire Mitleation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met. This includes but is not limited to access (international lire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503), approved fire • sprinkler and fire alarm systems(IFC,as amended,Section 903 and 907). • . Page 2ofa • • • • • • • • • • Section fi;Public Works The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen V1'ater System Standards,with`title 25,and • with the applicable standards of Title 8(Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code)of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of,Aspen Water Department. Utility . placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Section 8:Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's riles, regulations,and specifications, which are on file at the District office. • Section 9:Environmental Health • The state of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regard to asbestos. • Additionally, code requirements to be aware of when tiling a building permit include: a prohibition on engine idling,regulation of fireplaces,fugitive dust requirements,noise abatement • and pool designs. • Section 10;EnZineerina All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150,Outdoor lighnng. Section 11: School Lands medication . Before the Applicant is issued a Building Permit,the Applicant shall pay a fee-in-lieu of land dedication pursuant to Chapter 26.620,School Lands Dedication.The amount of the fee shall be • calculated by the Community Development Department using the calculation method and fee • schedule in effect at the time the applicant submits a Building Permit, Section 12;Im fact fees Before the Applicant is issued a Building Permit,the Applicant shall pay a Parks Development fee and a TDM/Air Quality fee pursuant to Chapter 26.610,Impact lees.The amount of the fees shall be calculated by the Community Development Department using the calculation method • and fee schedule in effect at the time the Applicant submits a Building Permit. • Section 13• • This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended • as herein provided,and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. t� Section 14: If any section,subsection.sentence,clause,phrase.or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction,such portion shall be . deemed a separate,distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thercol. • . Page 3 of 4 • • • • APPROVED by the Planning and"Luning Commission at its regular meeting on October 16, • 2012. • L.1 Erspamer,Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Drb Quina,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: s . . . ackic I.ot i n,Ucput-.* City Clerk . Page 4 of 4 • • • • • • • • RESOLUTION NO.22 (SERIES OF 2012) • • A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND SUBDIVISION REVIEWS FOR NEW COMMERICAL AND FREE-MARKET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT IS PART OF A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT,KNOWN AS VICTORIAN SQUARE CONDOMINIUMS AND LOCATED AT 601 E.HYMAN AVENUE, • CITY OF ASPEN,PITKIN COUNTY,COLORADO. • Parcel No.'s 2737182-25-801,2737-182-25427,2737-182-25-028,2737-182.25-029, 2737-182-25-030,2937-182-25-031,2737-182-25-032,2737-182-25-033. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Victorian Square,LLC requesting Growth Management and Subdivision Reviews • approval to develop new commercial net leasable area and a new free-market residential unit as part of a new mixed-use development located at 601 E.Nyman Avenue;and, • WHEREAS, prior to applying for the Subdivision review and Growth Management review for new commercial and residential development the Applicant received Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval from the Planning and Zoning • Commission via Resolution No. 19,Series of 2012;and, WHEREAS, the Growth Management review is for approval of both the • cornmeretal and residential components of a Mixed-Use Building which contains 7,265 sq. ft. of net leasable area, of which 2,056 sq. ft. of net leasable area is newly created • and1,835 sf of residential that is entirely newly created;and • WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, • the Community Development Department recommended approval of the Growth Management Review requests;and, • WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the Subdivision • Review request;and, • WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified • herein. has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development • Director,and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December 4,2012;and, • WHEREAS, the Planning. and Zoning Commission.grants approval of the i Growth Management Review request for the commercial component of a mixed development that contains 7.265 sq.R.of net leasable area;and, • • i i • • • • • • • • • . tank( K. vos t_auo11.t, YJ.".L41 4Ut1111.y� VV • • • WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants approval of the Growth Management Review request for the free-market residential unit within a mixed- use development that contains 1,835 sq.ft.of net livable area:and, • WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the Subdivision review request. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING . AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: • This approval shall be contingent on a recommendation from the AFCHA Board that housing mitigation shall occur via a Certificate of Affordable Dousing Credits. Section l: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal • Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Growth Management Reviews for the following items,in accordance with the plans attached as Exhibit A and • incorporated by this reference. • New Net Leasable Space: Ptmsuant to Section 26.470.080.1 of the Land Use Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants approval for 2,056 growth management allotments related to 2,056 sf of new net leasable space within the • proposed development. • Addition of Multi-Family Free-Market Space: Pursuant to Section 26.470.080.2 • of the Land Use Code,the Planning and Zoning Commission grants approval for one growth management allotment related to the addition of one multi-family • free-market residential unit within the proposed development. • Affordable Housing: Pursuant to Section 26.470.040.0.7 of the land Use Code, the Planning and 'Zoning Commission grants the Applicant approval to meet the requirement of affordable housing mitigation through purchasing a Certificate of • Affordable Housing Credits for the required 4.79 FTC's,to be deed-restricted at a Category 4 or lower. • The Certificate of Affordable Dousing Credits shall be extinguished by the City prior to issuance of building permit. Section 2: • Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends approval of Subdivision • review to City Council regarding the addition of a multi-family free-market residential unit having separate legal interests. • 2 • uanlce rS vos l:aual2.L t r.L".Let 4-uuui t-y t %,v • • i Section 3:Buildinu The Applicant shall meet adopted building codes and requirements if and when a building permit is submitted. All dimensional standards shall be met for the C-1 zone • district and confirmed at the time of building permit. Section 4:Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code,Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the i Engineering Department. The project must comply with CMP requirements at the time of permit. The design for the site must meet the requirements of the Urban Runoff iManagement Plan. A drainage plan must be submitted prior to building permit issuance. Section 5:Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met.This includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2009 Edition, Section 503), • approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems(IFC,as amended,Section 903 and 907). i Section 6:Public Works The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing i Advisory Code)of the Aspen Municipal Code,as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. . Each of the units within the building shall have individual water meters. iSection 7:Sanitation District Requirements: i Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on rile at the District office. tail and Grease interceptors (not i traps) are required for all food processing establishments and shall be identified and specified prior to building permit. Old service lines must be excavated and properly i abandoned. Section 8:Environments]Health The state of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requiremcnts with regard to asbestos. AAdditionally, code requirements to be aware of when filing a building permit include: a i prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces, fugitive dust requirements, noise abatement and pool designs. Section 9:Exterior Liahtina: All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the Citv's Outdoor Li¢ltting Cade • pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150.Outdoor lighting. • Section 10:Off-Street Parkine The Applicant is required to provide parking mitigation for the increase in net-leasable i commercial space on site. The new net leasable square footage will generate 2.056 parking spaces. The Applicant will provide cash-in-lieu payment as mitigation for the iparking spaces,as per Section 26.515:030.Required number of qff-streei parkipg spaces. 3 i i • of the Land Use Code. This same section of the Code states that the Applicant is not required to provide parking for the residential free-market unit as the development is within the C-1 (Commercial)zone district. • Section 11:Impact Fees • Before the Applicant is issued a Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay a Parks Development fee and a TDM/Air Quality fee pursuant to Chapter 26.610, lin.ac Files. The amount of the fees shall be calculated by the Community Development Department • using the calculation method and fee schedule in effect at the time the Applicant submits a building permit. • Section 12:School Land medication Fees Prior to the issuance of building permit, the Applicant shall pay a School Land Dedications fee pursuant to Chapter 26.620,School Lund Dedication. The amount of the fees shalt be calculated by the Community Development Department using the . calculation method and fee schedule in effect at the time the Applicant submits a building permit. • Section 13: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council,are • hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein,unless amended by an authorized entity. • Section 14: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided,and the same shall be conducted and concluded • under such prior ordinances. ection 15: if any section,subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such • portion shall be deemed a separate,distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission ofthe City of Aspen on this 0 day • of December.2012. F spamer la ping and Zoning Commission Chair 4 • • • • APPROVED AS TO FOI M: • Deb Quinn,Assistant City Attorney • • • ATTEST: • • Jackie Lothian,Deputy City Clerk • • • Exhibit A:Floor plans • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • rowland+broughton architecture and urban design 236 a M-— 3377 woe u,108 3open.to Ei9„ MN 1373 Hyman Avenue 92,:5,44.3,47,3 f, 303.M,13151 ALK \7 —------------ 04.10.2013 FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW F (D Q) COMMERCIAL Rev sbns (44 08.02,2012 04.10.2013 orlon111ERS ILLUSTRATIVE RENDERING Ii. OPENING W/ STAIR 1 UP Ell P MTI CM T 601 EAST HYMAN tip FENCE AND GATE AVENUE TRANSFORM AND PAD STAIR -TT- HE ---------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LINE PLAW PALETTE MENTIFIC NAME BI— QUANTITY COMMON NAME rl LANDSCAPE PLAN ��j SCALE 114"-i'-0-- PENNSYLVANICA 0, 4' 8 IT 16' PROJECT NO: 21213.00 DWG FILE: IRLYE.—LE FREEMA.I. 2.53'CELEBRATION 21213-Ll.O d.9 SHEET TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN CRIMSON PYGMY 8MBERIS THU.SERGII .3 9 BARBERRY 'ATROPURPUREA NA— Ll .0 (D Resolution Exhibit A Floor Plans 11a r \ \� 't1 i \\\ a .REyEL 0 FLOOR PEAK LEYEL t FLOOR PLAN EEVL 2 FLOORPLAN FLOOR AREA NEf t-FASABlE:. ��,� Ft,04RAREA NET LEASABLE: FLOOR AREA: NET LF1�SA6l,E 3,573 SF.x 0% 0 SF 1,626 SF COMMERC€AL. 2.W SF RETAIL 2.497 SF COMMERCIAL 3,162 SF OFFICE 3,022 SF COMMERCIAL +902 SF 'NON-UNfT 191 SF STAIREXEMPT 3,456 SF FLOOR P'6.ATE +367 SF 'NON:ULT 3,615 SF FLOORPLATE FIOORAREATQ7ALS EXEMPT-DECK AREA LEGEND 5.716 SF COMMERCIAL(75%) 2250 SF FLOOR AREA ALLOWED ........... .._ NET LEASABLE FLOOR AREA RESIDENTIAL{254; x15 76 PERGENT ALLOWED ' 7,GW SF TOTALAREA(100%) 337.5 SF E%EMPTOECKAHFA NET LIVABLE FLOOR AREA i� RESIDENTIAL AREA- .DECKAHEA ........... �•/// eft ii �'IsIII 2260 SF ALLOWABLE AREA337-6 SF EXEMPTOECKAREA OEGKAREA :11!§z SF TOTAL PROPOSED AREA +298,0 SF REMAINING RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA 296 SF REMAININGAREA 63$.SSF TOTAL DECK AREA 'OPEN TO BELOW \ .._._..�._o.r�4 .........: LEVEL3FEOORPEAN - �� PROPOSED DECK AREA: NON-UNITSPACE FLOGRAREA. NET LIVABLE: 512.0 SF DECK#1 .._... ..." 9,s52 SF RESIDENTIAL 1,635 SF RESIDENTIAL «123-5 Sr DECK#2 EXEMPTIONS ` 285 SF EXQ.IPTIQNS 835.5 SF TOTAL.OECKAREA - .. _...__.......... ...... c-+ +0 SF 'NLN-UNIT PEDESTRIAN AMENITY 4237 fiF FLOOR PI:ATE I I 1 t I i I i F k • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MEMORANDUM r • TO: Sara Nadolny,Connnunity Development Department FROM: Cindy Christensen,APCHA.Operations Manager DATE. December 6,2012 RE: 601 E.Ilyntan(aka ricfartan Square)Redevelo�nienl ISSUE. The applicant is requesting approval to mitigate the employee housing requirement by • purchasing affordable housing credit certificates for the redevelopment of the 601 East Hyman property. • BACKGBOUAID.- The project involves the demolition and replacement of the current.two-story • commercial building with a three-story artixed use building. Commercial space will be located in • the basement,first and second floor,and a single-family residence is to be located on the third level. • DISCUSSION; The applicant is required to mitigate for the additional employees impacted by the redevelopment. The applicant is requesting that the mitigation be in the Toru of the use or the • affordable housing credit program. Below are the calculations to show the mitigation requirement: • Existing Proposed 1191 • Type Location FAR . FAR Difference Kiltiplier X Mitigalion Commercial . Basement 0 1,826 1,826 3.075 60% 3.36807 Commercial I"Floor 3,045 2,117 -628 4.100 60% wl.54488 • Commercial 2n°Floor 2,164 3.1322 858 3.075 60% ]:58301 Residential 3rd Floor 0 11835 1,835 :3 30% 1,37625 TOTAL OFF SITE MITIGATION 4.78335 • The residential mitigation is based on 30% of the additional square footage of 1,85 (550.50) divided by 400 square feet(I employee=400 square feet of net livable area). • Based on the:above inforniation,the employee housing mitigation required is 4.78335 F IT's that • is being proposed to be satisfied by the purchase of the affordable housing credit certificates, RECOMMENDATION: The APCHA Board reviewed the application at their regular meeting held December 5, 2012 and are in agreement that :providing the affordable housing credit certificates is an accepted option to satisfy the employee housing mitigation at the 4.7833517FI--" . • 602 E.Hyman taka Victorian square)Redevelopment _ Page t • • • • • • • • • • • Easy Peep Labels i d Bend along line to Attachment 10 Use.Avery©Template 5160 Feed Paper expose Pop-up-EdgeTM^ A i 2012 TRUST FBI RHODA ISRAEL 850% 308 HUNTER LLC 4 SKIERS LP • 708 3RD AVE 490 WILLIAMS ST 1108 NORFLEET DR NEW YORK, NY 10017 DENVER,CO 80218 NASHVILLE,TN 372201412 514 AH'LLC 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC • 514 E HYMAN AVE 517 E HOPKINS AVE 402 MIDLAND PARK ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 • 610 EAST HYMAN LLC C/O CHARLES CUNNIFFE 630 EAST HYMAN LLC 633 SPRING II LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE#207 610 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 • 635 E HOPKINS LLC ANDERSON ROBERT M&LOUISE E ASPEN ART MUSEUM • 532 E HOPKINS 1021 23RD ST 590 N MILL ST • ASPEN,CO 81611 CHETEK,WI 54728 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN BLOCK.99 LLC ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC ASPEN GROVE ASSOCIATES LLP 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418E COOPER AVE#207 _ C/O M&W PROPERTIES ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 205 S MILL ST#301A ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN KOEPPEL LLC ASPEN PLAZA LLC ASPEN SQUARE VENTURES LLP PO BOX 1709 CIO M&W PROPERTIES 3551 ST GAUDENS RD C/O: MARCUS 205 S MILL ST STE 301A COCONUT GROVE,FL 331336530 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 • AV STEIN LLC 19.08% AVP PROPERTIES LLC BASS CAHN 601 LLC 601 E HYMAN AVE 630 E HYMAN AVE#25 PO BOX 4060 • ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 • BATTLE GERALD LIVING TRUST BELL MTN QUAL RES CONDO ASSOC • BAUM ROBERT E HIXON BURT LIVING TRUST LLC PO BOX 1518 PO BOX 2847 320 S SPRING ST NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92659 STOCKBRIDGE,MA 01262 ASPEN,CO 81611 • BERN FAMILY ASPEN PROPERTY LLC BERSCH BLANCHE TRUST BG SPRING LLC • 65 FIRST NECK LN 9642 YOAKUM DR 300 S SPRING ST#202 SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11968 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90210 ASPEN,CO 81611 BIG HOPKINS LLC BISCHOFF JOHN C BOOGIES BUILDING OF ASPEN LLC 421 N BEVERLY DR#300 502'S VIA GOLONDRINA CIO LEONARD WEINGLASS BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90210 TUCSON,AZ 85716-5843 534 E COOPER AVE ASPEN,CO 81611 klquettes taciles a peter ; A. Repliez A la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com Utiiisez le abarit AVERY®5160® Sens de reveler le rebord Po •u ' ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 chargement p p" • • Easy Peep Labels iA bend along lineto I ( AVERY@ 51600 Use AveryO Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edge*?^ 1�J • BORGIOTTI CLAUDIO BPOE ASPEN LODGE#224 BRONSON.RICHARD L TRUST 50% • 10509 HUNTING CREST LN 210 S GALENA ST#21 4510 NE DELAMAR PIL • VIENNA,VA 22192 ASPEN,CO 81611 LEES SUMMIT,MO 64064 CALGI RAYMOND D CARVER RUTH A&MARTIN G CAVES KAREN W • 134 TEWKESBURY RD 10 BYRON LN 1 BARRENGER CT SCARSDALE,NY 10583 MUSCATINE,IA 52761 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 • CHATEAU ASPEN UNIT 21=A LLC CHATEAU ASPEN CONDO ASSOC 421 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CTR CJAR LLC 630 E COOPER AVE STE G 2514 LAKE MEAD DR • ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN; CO 816113551 LAFAYETTE;CO 80026 • COOPER STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC COOPER SPRINGS'LLC C/O PYRAMID PROPERTY ADVISORS COX JAMES E LIVING TRUST 4 EASTON OVAL 3284 SURMONT DR. . COLUMBUS',OH 43219 418 E COOPER AVE#207 LAFAYETTE,CA 94549 ASPEN,CO 81611 • DALY CAROL Y REV TRUST DCGB LLC DIBRELL CHARLES G JR&FRANCES • ATT'GIORGIO:RIGHETTI CFO 617 E COOPER 24 ADLER CIR ASPEN,CO 81611 610 WEST 52 ST GALVESTON,TX 77551-5828 • NEW YORK, NY 10019 EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC ECCHYMOSIS LLC ELLERON CHEMICALS CORP . 1601 ELM ST#4000 4802 E 2ND ST#2 2101 WAUKEGAN RD#210 DALLAS,TX 75201 LONG BEACH,CA 90803 BANNOCKBURN,IL 60015 ERGAS VENESSA BLAIR&CLAUDE EXELCEDAR INC 20% FEHR EDITH B REVOCABLE TRUST PO BOX 4316 534 E:HYMAN'AVE 543 FOX RUN DR ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 CARBONDALE,CO 81623-8502 • FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD • FERRY JAMES H Ill FLY MARIE N BOX 167 C/O PITKiN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC 7447 PEBBLE POINTE GLENCOE, IL 60022-0167 520 E COOPER W BLOOMFIELD, MI 483.22 ASPEN,CO 81611 • FURNGULF LTD GELD LLC • A COLO JOINT VENTURE C/O LOWELL MEYER GiLBERT GARY 616 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 1247 1556 ROYAL BLVD ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612-1247 GLENQALE,CA 91207 GOFEN ETHEL CARO TRUSTEE GOLDEN PANTHERS LLC GONE WEST LLC • 455 CITY FRONT PLAZA 60 S MARKET ST#1400 401 W CENTER CHICAGO,IL 60611 SAN JOSE,CA 95113-2396 SEARCY,AR 721451406 • ttiquettes faciles a Peler ; Repliez i3 la hachure afin de www.avery.com • Utilisez le abarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord Po u ''c 9-800GO VERY g chargemenY p' p �0� a • • Easy Peep Labo15 A ammm ►lend slang line to i ARYO 51600 • Use Averya Template 51600 �' Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM • GOODING SEAN A 80%&RICHARD L GORDON LEONARD&ELLEN GREENWAY COMPANY INC 20% 12204 GALESVILLE DR 666 TRAVIS ST#100 • C/O PARAGON RANCH INC 620 E HYMAN AVE#1 E GAITHERSBURG,MD 20878 SFiREVEPORT,LA 71101 • ASPEN,CO 81611 • • GROSFELD ASPEN.PROP PART LLC HEMP SUZANNE LIV TRUST HENDRICKS SIDNEY J ARD 10880 WILSHIRE BLVD#2222 15470 POMONA RD 6614 LAE VILLEEVERRD • LOS ANGELES,CA 90024 BROOKFIELD,WI 53005 PET LAKE CA 49 PETALUMA,CA 94954-9256 • HIMAN LLC • PO BOX 6159 HORSEFINS LLC HUNKE CARLTON J LVG TRST SWANBOURNE WA 6010 601 E HOPKINS AVE 4410 TIMBERLINE DR SW • AUSTRALIA, ASPEN,CO 81611 FARGO, ND 58103 • HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP ISRAEL KENNETH 25% JENNE LLP • 205 S MILL ST#301A 615 OCEAN BLVD 1510 WINDSOR RD • ASPEN,CO 81611 GOLDEN BEACH,FL 33160 AUSTIN,TX 77402 JOSHUA&CO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS JOYCE:EDWARD KOEPPEL KEVIN F TRUST LLC 1310 RITCHIE CT 3551 ST GAUDENS RD • 300 S HUNTER ST CHICAGO,IL 60610 COCONUT GROVE,FL 33133 • ASPEN,CO :81611 • KRAJIAN RON KUTINSKY BRIAN LCT LP TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 617 E COOPER AVE#114 26480 NORMANDY RD • ASPEN,CO 81611 FRANKLIN,MI 480251034 PO BOX 101444 • NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 • . MALLARD ENTERPRISES LP MARTELL BARBARA MATTHEWS ZACHARY 317 SIDNEY BAKER S#400 702 E HYMAN AVE PO BOX 10582 KERRVILLE,TX 78028 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 • MAYFAIR INVESTMENTS LLC MCMURRAY WILLIAM&HELEN MAVROVIC EBNA PO BOX 268 29 MIDDLE HEAD RD • 530END ST APT RICHMOND VICTORIA 3121 MOSMAN NSW 2088 • NEW YORK,NY 1002121 AUSTRALIA, AUSTRALIA, • • MJM AMENDED&RESTATED TRUST MJM HOLDINGS it LLC MOEN.DONNE&ELIZABETH FAM TRUST 1701 GOLF RD 1776 SOUTH LN 8 CABALLEROS RD • NORTHBROOK,IL 60062 T01NER.3 5TE 203 ROLLING HILLS,CA 90274 • ROLLING MEADOWS,IL 60008 • MORRIS ROBERT P MYSKO BOHDAN D N S N ASSOCIATES INC • 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 615 E HOPKINS 11051 W ADDISON ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 FRANKLIN.PARK, IL 60131 • • Etiquettes faciles a peler ; A Repliez ala hachure afin de ; www.aveq&com Utilisez le abarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord PCr)-u 'c ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' • g chargernent I p' • Easy PeelO Labels { A. raw= Bend along line to T�j A RVO 51600 • Use Avery®Template 5160 Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edge • NATTERER HELEN NEUMANN MICHAEL NIELSON COL STEVE&CAROL D • 67 BAYPOINT CRSS 7381 MOHASNIC DR 501 S FAIRFAX OTTAWA.ONTARIO BLOOMFIELD HILLS,MI 48301 ALEXANDRIA,VA 22314 • CANADA K2G6R1, ........... _ • NJ STEIN LLC 52.98% NONNIE LLC OBERHOLTZER JORDAN • 418 E COOPER AVE#207 PO BOX 565 PO BOX 10582 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN;CO 81612 • OLITSKY TAMAR&STEPHEN P&L PROPERTIES LLC PACIFIC WEST INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 514 101 S 3RD ST#360 320 MARTIN ST#100 • GWYNEDD VALLEY;PA 19437 GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81501 BIRMINGHAM,MI 480091485 • PEARSON REBECCA J PETERSON CHRISPY&JAMES E PfTKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS • 1610 JOHNSON DR 867 HAVEN CREST CT NORTH ASSOC • STILLWATER,MN 55082 GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81506 517 W NORTH ST ASPEN,CO 81611 • PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% PLATNIUM GLOBAL VENTURES LLCPORTE BROOKE • 534 E HYMAN AVE 344 PROSPECT ST#D 3520 PADDOCK RD ASPEN,CO 81611 LA JOLLA,CA 92037 WESTON,FL.33331 • RAHLEK LTD AT BANK OF AMERICA RED FLOWER PROP CO PTNSHP REICH DANIEL S TRUST 20% 3903 BELLAIRE"BLVD 575 MADISON AVE#1006 6 RINCONST • HOUSTON,TX 77025 NEW YORK; NY 100222511 IRVINE,CA 92702 • REICH MELVIN L TRUST 80% REUSS LIGHT LLC REVOLUTION PARTNERS LLC 4609 SEASHORE DR PO BOX 5000 PO BOX 1247 • NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92663 SNOWMASS VILLAGE,CO 81615 ASPEN,CO' 81612 • RG COOPER ST 4.83% C/O RONALD GARFIELD ROSS JOHN F RUBENSTEIN ALAN B&CAROL S • 7600 CLAYTON RD 57 OLDFIELD DR 601 E HYMAN AVE ST LOUIS,MO 63117 SHERBORN, MA 01770 • ASPEN,CO 81611 • RUST TRUST RUTLEDGE REYNIE S&S REALTY PARTNERS LLC • 9401 WILSHIRE BLVD#760 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR 1040 FIFTH AVE#2C BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 SEARCY,AR 72143 NEW YORK,NY 10028 • SANDIFER C W JR TRUST 50% SCHEUERMAN JOANNE E SCHNITZER KENNETH L&LISA L 240 LINDEN,DR 200 LOCUST ST#23A 2100 MCKINNEY AVE#1760 BOULDER,CO 80304 PHILADELPHIA,PA 19106 DALLAS,TX 75201 • Etlquettes faciles 6 peler A Repliez A la hathure afin de www.avery.com Sens de • Utilisez le gabarit AVERY0 5160'& chargement rdv6ler le rebord Pop-ups"c 1-800-GO-AVERY • g1to113 • Easy Peel0 Labelsfiend along line to � (� ��® 51G0� � Use AveryO Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up Ed eTI^ 1r� • SEGUW JEFF W&MADALYN B TRUST SEGUIN MARY E TRUST SHUMATE MARK • 617 E COOPER#412 2404 LORING ST#155 BLDG 421 G ABC • ASPEN,CO 81611 SAN DIEGO,CA 92109 ASPEN,CO 81611 SILVER DIP EQUITY VENTURE LLC SJA ASSOCIATES LLC STEIN BUILDING LLC 23.11% 2100 MCKINNEY STE 1760 418 E COOPER AVE#207 601 E HYMAN AVE DALLAS,TX 75201 ASPEN,CO 81611. ASPEN,CO 81611 STERLING TRUST COMP STRUDEL HOLDINGS LLC SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC . 2091 MANDEVILLE CYN RD 314 S GALENA ST 567 SAN NICOLAS DR PENTHOUSE LOS ANGELES,CA 90049 ASPEN,CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 • TENNESSEE THREE RENTALS TENNESSEE THREE TERMINELLO DENNISJ&KERRY L PO BOX 101444 C/O J H COBLE NAS 656 RIDGEWAY • OLD HICKORY BLVD NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 NASHVILLE,TN 37218-4020 WHITE PLAINS,NY 10605-4323 • THOMPSON ROSS&LYNETTE TOMKINS FAMILY TRUST TREUER CHRISTIN L 1502 GREYSTONE DR 520 E COOPER AVE#209 981 E BRIARWOOD CIR N . CARBONDALE,CO 81623 ASPEN,CO 81611 LITTLETON,CO 80122 VARADY LOTHAR&CHERYL TRUST VAUSE FAMILY TRUST WALLEN-OSTERAA REV LIVING TRUST • 5036 MAUNALANI CIR 3020 PLAZA DE MONTE 36 OCEAN VISTA HONOLULU,HI 96816 LAS VEGAS, NV 89102 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 • WALLING REBECCA WARNKEN MARK G WAVO PROPERTIES LP 350 BLANCA AVE PO BOX 556 5121/2 E,GRAND AVE#200 TAMPA,FL 33606 STILLWATER,MN 550820556 DES MOINES,IA 50309-1942 • WEIDEL LAWRENCE W WEIGAND BROTHERS LLC WELLS RICHARD A&SUSAN T TRUST PO BOX 1007 15.0 N MARKET 100 N TRYON ST 47TH FLR • MONROE,GA 30655• WICHITA, KS 67202 CHARLOTTE,NC 28202 WF SWEARINGEN LLC WILLIAMS CRAIG&LEE FAM PTNRSHP WISE JOSEPH 380 FOREST HILL RD 5577 CEDAR CREEK 1320 HODGES ST MACON,GA 31210 HOUSTON,TX 77056 RALEIGH,NC 27604-1414 • WM SNOWMASS LLC WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE WOODS FRANK J III • 500 FIFTH AVE#2440 22750 WOODWARD AVE#204 51027 HWY 6&24 STE 100 NEW YORK,NY 10110 FERNDALE, MI 48220 GLENWOOD SPRINGS,CO 81601 ttiquettes faciles a peler ; Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le abarit AVER 5160 ° Sens de rev@ler to rebord Po u)}c ' 1-800-G(7-AVERY ' 9 chargement p" i (4110 lf,3 • . Easy PeelO Labels A Bend along line to � (� AVE RY®5160 � Use AveryO Template 5160 1 feed Paper expose Pop-tip Edgers^ .! • • WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N YERAMIAN CHARLES REV TRUST • 13 BRAMLEY RD PO BOX 12347 LONDON W10 6SP UK, ASPEN,CO 81612 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • .................... i • i • i • j • • • • • • • • Etiquettes fables A peter ; Repliez a la hachure afin de ; www.avery.cotm Utilisez le abarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord Po a Mc 1-800-GO-AVERY • 9 � chargement p" p' � i N 0 50 1oa �E E HOPKINS AVE Feet W ... s � This map/drawingfimage is a graphical representation g TROYER TROUSDALE of the features depicted and.is not a legal f . TOWNHOME$j representation.The accuracy may change _o CONDOASSOC., depending on the enlargement or reduction. 517,F11§T ASPENCopyright 2013 Aspen/PitkinGiS PASPEN 835,E HOPKINS; PLAZA: 601 East -419!701311:43:02AMC'.ZIS1temP%AOtiIt318C1EHyeunAve,mad S royedTrousdate I Townhornes af f- 601 F_P;ST HOPKIN$ r CONDOASS06 ; Z ro'i, _ T 10 EAS .,; Tamar3wood 700.EAST CONDO HYMAtASSOCr - DOASSOCINHEB BUILDING F,URNGU_LR i 4( LLC{ CO I i LI I SJA. C ASPEN LLC' }LTD ' . DLOE� 'LlASSOCIATES Pitktm- BANK 80% s "' LLC ' Center - F Hymant • .� - 4 t.:PITKIN - _ .: -: '�TAMARAWOOD �ntialL � B.P.O.E: .CENTER b6llding~ C7 i BUILDING Z t CONDOASSOG COtJDOi1SS'GC" Gr a co E HYMAN AVE l 01 j SPRING'S_ _ SSi � CONN ASSOC 3o0 _.... I iSAS I COX JAMES1 ASPEN CORE CLW633 ASPENART-`' aSP^�9 VENTURES- TRUST SPRING tl. - -LLtMUSEUM. �G{ ".LLC. 308 C.._.. : ;HUNTER.. .. _ TO rr I 1 � t.ASPENHOF ON _ DCGB LLC REVLUTIO - CANDO ASSOC,; COOPER. � . PARTNER STREET: CONDOASSOC BOOGIES. Mo_untalri 1 Cf) 1I t BUILDING OF HUNTER PLAZA UDt ASSQCWTES LL h0imP °Chateau pen,1 N tf ' QUALIFIED RES DAENCES. CHATEAU ASPEN — CONDOASSOC- E COOPER AVE t I ASPEN GROVE EDe 4 I r ASSOCIATES- — l LLP .eowmsn I IS LLi ."III I :r ASPENSOUARE .- { LLC.52.98%'. CONOQASSOC. t _ „_ A Attachment 11 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY • • PLANNER: Sara Nadolny,429-2739 DATE: 3.29.2013 w PROJECT: 601 E. Hyman Ave—Victorian Square- Redevelopment REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Clauson Associates Inc. w • DESCRIPTION: The potential applicant is interested in demolishing the existing two-story commercial building and replacing it with a three-story mixed-use building that will contain two floors of commercial space and a one floor of free-market residential space. For this review, the applicant will be required to show how the project's final design conforms to the applicable Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines and other applicable sections of the Land Use Code. The applicant received conceptual commercial design approval from P&Z on October 16, 2012 through Resolution No. 19, Series of 2012, and GMQS/Subdivision approvals from P&Z on December 0, 2012 through Resolution No. 22, Series of 2012. The applicant has received approval w to construct a mixed-use building that contains 7,265 sf of net leasable area and 1,835 sf of net livable area. 2,056 growth management allotments were approved and allocated for the increase in net leasable space,and one growth management allotment was approved and allocated for the multi- family free-market residential unit. The latter Resolution also grants the applicant approval to meet the affordable housing mitigation requirement through the purchase of a Certificate of Affordable • Housing Credit for the required 4.79 FTE's at a deed-restricted Category 4 or lower. The Certificate of Affordable Housing Credits shall be extinguished by the City prior to issuance of building permit. • • The provision of off-street parking is not required with this application, and no off-street parking has • been proposed. . The applicant has submitted a signed and notarized Notice to Vacate Condominium Plat for Units 1-7 and a Notice to Vacate All Covenants for Victorian Square Condominiums, which have been signed by Andrew Hecht, Vice President of Victorian Square LLC. Therefore the applicant is not required to pursue Subdivision in a public hearing before the City Council. Impact fees, triggered by the addition of new let leasable and net livable space, will be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. Neighborhood outreach, prior to public hearing is a • requirement of this review. w Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): Land Use Code Section(s) • 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.304.035 Neighborhood Outreach w 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.610 Impact Fees 26.710.150 Commercial (C1)Zone District w The Land Use Code is found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning_ and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ The Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines are found here: w http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Plann1ng-and-Zoning/Current-Planning/ • « The Land Use application is found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community- Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Applications-and-Fees/ • • Review by: -Staff for complete application - Referral agencies for technical considerations - P&Z for Final Commercial Design approval Public Hearing: Yes, P&Z Neighborhood Outreach: Yes, prior to P&Z public hearing Planning Fees: $4,550 for fourteen (14) hours of staff time. Additional staff time required will be billed at • $325/hour. Referral Fees: Engineering, billed at$265/hour(1 hour deposit) Parks, billed at$650 (flat fee) • Total Deposit: $5,465 Total Number of Application Copies: 10 for P&Z application. To apply,submit the following information: 1. Total Deposit for review of application. 2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 3. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a • current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages,judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. Completed Land Use Application. 5. Signed fee agreement. 6. Pre-application Conference Summary. 7. An 81/2"x 11"vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Proof of ownership. • 9. Existing and proposed elevation drawings and site plan that include proposed dimensional requirements as well as landscaping plan. 10. Elevations of the proposed building and the buildings in the Hyman block to compare overall heights, storefront heights and massing. 11. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed • development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. 11. All other materials required pursuant to the specific submittal requirements. 12. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements • and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. 13. Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and-accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department * at 920-5090 for additional information. 14. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing 15. Copies of prior approvals. 16. Applications shall be provided in paper format(number of copies noted above) as well as the.text only on either of •, the following digital formats. Disclaimer: S The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary • does not create a legal or vested right. r a r it