HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.council.worksession.20150901
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
September 01, 2015
4:00 PM, City Council Chambers
MEETING AGENDA
I. Housing Futures
II. Arts and Non-Profits Grants Review Direction
Page 1 of 4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Chris Everson, Affordable Housing Project Manager
THRU: Barry Crook, Assistant City Manager
DATE OF MEMO: August 28, 2015
MEETING DATE: September 1, 2015
RE: Planning future affordable housing development
REQUEST OF COUNCIL: Staff seeks Council direction on planning future affordable housing
development.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: On January 6, 2015, Council directed staff to seek
community input on future affordable housing development alternatives, with narrowed choices
of what to develop and where. Choices should include primarily long-term rental and secondarily
seasonal rental at City-owned properties located at 517 Park Circle, 802 West Main Street and 488
Castle Creek Drive. Council indicated that the lumber yard property was to be considered “off the
table” for the short term. Vetting realistic density at each site should be addressed. User
considerations should include local workforce, aging population, Aspen-native youth returning
from college, and dogs. Staff should seek partnerships with local employers. Staff should return to
Council with results of outreach effort.
BACKGROUND: In a joint City-County housing work session in 2012, staff submitted a Strategic
Review of Housing study that considered the effects of job growth, neighborhood gentrification and
retirement. The study concluded that 657 new affordable workforce housing units are needed within
the urban growth boundary from 2012 to 2022. At the time, workforce housing was tasked to the City
and senior housing efforts were assigned to Pitkin County. Since 2012, approximately 100 affordable
for-sale units have been created and occupied.
DISCUSSION: Staff organized community outreach events which were held June 11, July 8,
August 6 and August 27, 2015. Staff recorded over 900 comments from about 125 unique
participants. All comments received are included in the attached “Exhibit A” document.
What to develop and where? More than any other comments received, there seems to be a
community-wide sense that there is currently a significant need for affordable rental housing in
Aspen for active workforce and for retirees. Consensus appears to be around long-term, mainly
one- and two- bedroom, rentals as well as a secondary need for more seasonal rental units,
sometimes referencing the 4-bedroom style units found at Club Commons in Snowmass. Although
less in overall intensity, there also seems to be an ever-present voice in the community that more
affordable for-sale housing is needed as well, particularly for growing families.
The community seems to generally support that the City should develop property which it owns at
802 West Main Street, 517 Park Circle and 488 Castle Creek Drive for the purpose of fulfilling
affordable housing needs. Staff displayed three development utilization scenarios for each property
which were entitled “Higher”, “Lower” and “Mid” utilization scenarios. Comments received often
support the “Higher Utilization” and “Mid Utilization” scenarios at each site, although there were
notably comments suggesting lower utilization levels at the 802 West Main Street and 517 Park
Circle properties. Thus staff expects that there will be some neighborhood pushback at those sites,
particularly from the property owners immediately adjacent to 517 Park Circle.
P1
I.
Page 2 of 4
User considerations: Accommodation for ‘workforce only’ received more support than anything
else in terms of users, but there is also an increasing voice in the community pointing to a need for
more senior housing for Aspen’s aging population. Development of ‘senior friendly’ units could
be accommodated to perhaps facilitate downsizing by retirees. Most comments received related to
Aspen-native youth returning from college or other work elsewhere suggested that these users
should utilize the APCHA program in the same manner as workforce, although there were no
display materials which prompted commenters to consider whether the work history requirement
should be shortened or waived for those users.
Always a passionate topic, there seems to be significant support for allowing dogs in affordable
housing, albeit tempered with a general desire for enforcement measures such as damage/cleanup
deposits, leashes, waste disposal enforcement and other impact mitigation means where possible.
Many of those who participated also seem to want employers with more than a handful of
employees to help pay the cost of housing workforce. The few employers who commented seemed
to express a willingness to participate, but cannot afford to participate at the 100% unsubsidized
level and request that alternatives be considered.
Other recurring themes:
Growing need for senior housing
Incentivizing downsizing and maintenance of existing facilities
Need to focus on maintaining existing affordable housing facilities, particularly Centennial
Focus on enforcement of qualifications as well as improvements to qualifications criteria
Increase support for HOAs including capital reserves, HOA accountability, maintenance
Some support for redevelopment of the Truscott 100 building, which needs improvement
Centralization of rental pool availability/application to support those who need rentals
Themes from the comments received at the June 11 and July 8 sessions are shown below:
P2
I.
Page 3 of 4
FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: A rough order of magnitude budget estimate for future
work to create the affordable housing contemplated in this memo may be near $18 million. (For
those interested in the total cost to develop affordable housing, this rough order of magnitude
budget estimate does not include previously sunk costs such as land.) More detailed cost estimating
should be performed when these projects become better defined, and additional work is needed to
determine how much of this effort staff would recommend that the City take on at once, and staff
should also pursue evaluation of alternative funding sources such as tax credits, loans and grants.
That said, the City’s 150 Housing Development Fund does appear to have the capacity to fund all
development contemplated in this memo within the next few years as well as being able to carry
future funding allocation for capital reserve policy efforts and/or potential acquisition of some new
land (dependent on the total costs of those additional efforts).
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The quantity of new housing development contemplated in this
memo plus additional expansion tentatively planned for Burlingame Ranch in 2020-2021 would
still leave the estimated need of 657 units by 2022 - as concluded in the 2012 study - less than 40%
fulfilled. Noting that adjustments may be made when staff returns to Council with additional
information, staff suggests that Council focus on the following questions:
(1) Does Council wish to initiate an effort to develop affordable housing to fulfill the need
described? Staff could return with information about a process such as:
(1a) Staff to further define development criteria for Council review, and then
(1b) seek development and operational partnerships via RFP(s), and then
(1c) compare top partnership proposals to option of City as developer/APCHA as operator.
(2) Does Council wish to establish the following targets regarding what to develop where? Staff
could return with more information about the “Mid-Utilization” development scenarios
previously mentioned:
(2a) 802 West Main St: Long-term rental housing with around (10) 1BR units, 1:1 parking,
“retiree-friendly” design, and potential to be converted to for-sale in future; and
(2b) 517 Park Circle: Long-term rental housing with around (13) 1BR units, 1:1 parking,
“retiree-friendly” design, and potential to be converted to for-sale in future; and
(2c) 488 Castle Creek: Long-term and/or seasonal rental housing with around (24) 1BR and/or
4-bedroom seasonal units with 1:1 parking, and potentially with employer participation in
seasonal housing.
Note: The “Mid Utilization” scenarios shown above are about 78% of what was discussed as
“maximum density” in the recent affordable housing mitigation fee-in-lieu discussions where
Council decided to base affordable housing mitigation fee-in-lieu calculations on 75% of
“maximum density”.
(3) Does Council wish to initiate an effort to target income levels for these proposed housing
developments? (See attached Exhibit B document taken from the 2012 Strategic Review of
Housing study.) Staff could return with additional information about:
(3a) Maintain existing model, where income levels for rental housing units are fixed at category
1, category 2 or category 3; and
(3b) consider a new model, where rentals may serve a mixture of income categories 1 through
4, while maintaining a targeted average in order to maintain a sustainable business plan
P3
I.
Page 4 of 4
(4) Other items for Council to consider directing staff to work on:
(4a) Communicate with Pitkin County regarding comments received about senior housing
(4b) Engage with employers to discuss potential methods for increased employer participation
(4c) Re-engage discussions with employers about potential seasonal housing partnerships
(4d) Potential further work on the following, with APCHA where appropriate (some which may
alternatively be addressed in the upcoming budget work sessions):
Incentivizing downsizing and maintenance of existing facilities
Maintaining existing affordable housing facilities, particularly Centennial
Enforcement of qualifications as well as improvements to qualifications criteria
Increased support for HOAs including capital reserves, HOA accountability,
maintenance
Future redevelopment of the Truscott 100 building
Centralization of rental pool availability/application to support those who need rentals
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: All Comments Received June 11, July 8, August 6, August 27, 2015
Exhibit B: Pitkin County Household Income Distribution and Existing Housing Stock / 2012
Strategic Review of Housing study
Exhibit C: Outreach Displays from June 11 and July 8, 2015
Exhibit D: Outreach Displays from August 6 and August 27, 2015
P4
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
June 11, 2015
TOPIC QUANTITY COMMENT
517 Park Circle 10 Develop 517 Park Circle as long term rental housing as soon as possible
Housing Need 9 The City should develop affordable rental housing at 802 West Main, 517 Park Circle and 488 Castle Creek
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 9 More need for long-term rentals
For-Rent / For-Sale 7 Both Long-term and seasonal for-rent should be done next
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 7 Seasonal and long-term rentals should not coexist in a new facility
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 7 A facility could serve both long-term and seasonal rental housing, given the right floor plans
User Considerations 7 There should be some kind of accommodation for retirees/aging
User Considerations 7 Facilities should allow dogs 100%
User Considerations 7 Facilities should allow dogs 50%
User Considerations 6 Rental housing developed should be for qualified workforce only
802 West Main Street 5 Re-develop 802 West Main Street as long term rental housing as soon as possible
802 West Main Street 5 Re-develop the 100 (studio) building at Truscott before developing 802 West Main Street
488 Castle Creek Drive 4 Re-develop the 100 (studio) building at Truscott before developing 488 Castle Creek Drive
488 Castle Creek Drive 4 Develop appropriate rental units for a senior community - near the hospital would be ideal and close to bus
service
For-Rent / For-Sale 4 Long-term for-rent should be done next
For-Rent / For-Sale 4 For-sale should be done next
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 4 Seasonal and long term rental may coexist in a new facility
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 4 A facility cannot serve both long-term and seasonal rental housing, given the right floor plans
488 Castle Creek Drive 3 Develop 488 Castle Creek Drive as long term rental housing as soon as possible
517 Park Circle 3 Develop 517 Park Circle as both long term and seasonal rental housing as soon as possible
517 Park Circle 3 Re-develop the 100 (studio) building at Truscott before developing 517 Park Circle
User Considerations 3 No special accommodation for youth who grew up in Aspen returning home form college or other work
488 Castle Creek Drive 2 Develop 488 Castle Creek Drive as seasonal rental housing as soon as possible
802 West Main Street 2 Re-develop 802 West Main Street as both long term and seasonal rental housing as soon as possible
Employer Partnerships 2 Yes, businesses of a certain size should be expected to help pay for housing - tax accommodation
User Considerations 2 Accommodation for youth who grew up in Aspen returning home form college or other work
User Considerations 2 Develop senior housing for retired Aspen workforce - limited development
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Develop rental housing at 517 Park Circle and 802 West Main Street prior to developing 488 Castle Creek
Drive
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Sell and use funds to develop property in town within roundabout
517 Park Circle 1 Develop rental housing at 802 West Main Street and 488 Castle Creek prior to developing 517 Park Circle
517 Park Circle 1 Develop this as rental housing and then sell the units 10-15 years later when the lumber yard property is
redeveloped
517 Park Circle 1 This is a good area for long term rental property, as it is largely a locals area already
Employer Partnerships 1 Yes, big employers should be expected to help pay for housing - tax cuts
Employer Partnerships 1 Small businesses with 10 employees or less should not be expected to pay for housing
Employer Partnerships 1 MAA and SkiCo do pay for housing employees
Employer Partnerships 1 Increase employer participation in affordable housing with tax write-offs and tax benefits. Government uses
taxes to control behavior.
Employer Partnerships 1 Employers should a limited liability payment for employee housing
For-Rent / For-Sale 1
We need to invest in affordable rental housing, possibly including improvements to existing rental inventory,
in order to allow younger worker-bees a first opportunity to establish a sustainable lifestyle here in Aspen and
the greater upper-valley
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 We cannot displace seniors in existing rental units to make room for the next generation, so building new long-
term rental inventory to allow seniors to downsize easily and/or remain where they are is needed
Housing Need 1 New affordable housing built should be rentals designed for seniors to provide a safe place for seniors
currently living in employee housing, to move in
Housing Need 1
Priority should go to younger families who will get more use of the housing. There needs to be an incentive for
people to move out of larger houses. There should be a trade program initiated where people could downsize
and make room for growing families
EXHIBIT A P5
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
June 11, 2015
Housing Need 1 We need to continue to produce both for-sale and for-rent and rents need to remain affordable over time
Housing Need 1 Great need for senior housing, particularly since basalt effort fell through
Housing Need 1 Re-evaluate housing (affordable) requirements on new free market development - eliminate loopholes so that
developers actually build employee housing instead of paying a fee and opting out
Housing Need 1 Need more rental options for seniors who want to remain in the valley but can't necessarily work - ability to
age in their rental homes
Housing Need 1 Before more is built, maintain existing housing, even privately owned HOA's
Housing Need 1 Building defects in existing facilities should be corrected, like Centennial
Housing Need 1 If people have not saved for capital repairs, and if they cannot afford necessary capital repairs, then they
should be required to move out
Housing Need 1 There should be more emphasis on education about capital reserve savings
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 More need for seasonal rentals
Miscellaneous 1
what we really need are year round housing options for the 20 somethings that do not earn enough
to pay $1200+ for a room!! They seasonal housing is great but it means that every spring my
son comes home again as he can not find affordable housing for the 3 month period that the music
school takes over the seasonal spaces. Seems like the student numbers have been dropping enough
to perhaps allow many of the apartments to be rented year round.
Miscellaneous 1 Provide inform/waiting lists in which people can sign up to a specific category & size (ex. 3 bdrm) home to be
emailed when one comes up.
Miscellaneous 1
Upkeep existing properties ex. the large lodge by North Star Reserve that is vacant, is an absolutely beautiful
location, but empty & rundown. Financially assist older employee housing (Hunter Creek-Solar voltaic system
on roof to upgrade boilers of employee buildings, Centennial-overhang roofs to prevent continued damage). A
certain percent should be planned to upkeep for needs 20 yrs after being built and every 10 years following
for all employee housing. What type of upkeep would be unique to that properties needs. If sold affordable
need to be maintained affordable too.
Miscellaneous 1 Community Garden located across from Hunter Creek for community around that area (Marolt's has a 20 yr
wait list)
Miscellaneous 1
Future units built need to be 3 and 4 bedrooms otherwise it's inadvertantly like China creating a one child
family policy, because there's not an affordble way for larger families to live up here. Families bring a lot of
stability and joy to a city.
Miscellaneous 1
Units should take advantage of the CO sunlight and views by intentionally being built with windows facing
good views and have many windows. Being a wintery city with high suicide rates, natural light and nature help
withSeasonal Depression Disorder and from my observations the suicides seem to occur primarly in winter or
at the end of winter. Also having overhead lighting rather than just outlets for lamps. (Lamps are challenging
with children, take up room in the limited space.)
Miscellaneous 1
Carbon monoxide detectors don't need to be in units w/o garages & dryers (most employee units) & should
not be required for resale-this is one of the contract areas they are sticklers about, yet other areas like shades
that originally came w/ unit, broken outlets, holes in walls, wall paper, working appliances even though these
are in the legal contract to be fixed before sale the APCHA people act like you are asking too much when
making a list of these things that need to be fixed prior to sell.
Miscellaneous 1 APCHA office employees to receive training on efficiency in creating template emails & procedures so as to
make the most of their time & money for salaries.
User Considerations 1 Rental housing developed should not necessarily be for qualified workforce only
User Considerations 1 Downsize with dignity
Total comments 165
Total participants 20
EXHIBIT A P6
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
JULY 8, 2015
TOPIC QUANTITY COMMENT
User Considerations 22 If rental housing is to be developed, it should it be for qualified workforce only
517 Park Circle 18 I would favor a higher density for rent program at 517 Park Circle
Housing Need 18 The City should develop affordable rental housing at 802 West Main, 517 Park Circle and 488 Castle Creek
488 Castle Creek Drive 15 I would favor a lower density for-sale program
517 Park Circle 15 I would favor a lower density for sale program at 517 Park Circle
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 15 Given the right floor plan, a facility could serve the purpose of either long-term or seasonal housing
488 Castle Creek Drive 13 Develop 488 Castle Creek Dr as long-term and short-term rental housing asap
For-Rent / For-Sale 12 both long term and seasonal rentals should be done next
For-Rent / For-Sale 12 for sale should be done next
User Considerations 12 Support dogs allowed 100%
488 Castle Creek Drive 11 I would favor a hgher density for rent program
802 West Main Street 11 I would favor a lower density for sale program at 802 West Main St
For-Rent / For-Sale 11 Long term for rent should be done next
User Considerations 11 Do not support dogs being allowed at 50% of a facility
517 Park Circle 8 Develop 517 Park Circle as long-term rental housing asap
517 Park Circle 7 We should improve Centennial before we build new property
517 Park Circle 5 Develop 517 Park Circle as long-term and short-term rental housing asap
517 Park Circle 5 I would favor a lower density for rent program at 517 Park Circle
802 West Main Street 5 Re-develop this property as both seasonal and long term rental housing ASAP
802 West Main Street 5 I would favor a higher density for rent program at 802 West Main St
Miscellaneous 5 Need more 3-4 bedrooms for growing families
User Considerations 5 Given an incentive to trade to a smaller unit / Allowing young professionals w/ growing families to move into a bigger
place
User Considerations 5 Facilities should NOT allow dogs 100%
488 Castle Creek Drive 4 I would favor a lower density for rent program
488 Castle Creek Drive 4 I would favor a higher density for-sale program
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 4 Current need for long-term rentals outweighs need for seasonal rentals
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 4 Do we want locals who have a stake and a future or temps who could care less, are here to party and move on! If you
want locals, give them ownership.
Miscellaneous 4 APCHA should do a better job of making sure that the rightful owner is actually living in their unit (unless they have
been approved through APCHA to rent it for 6 mos).
User Considerations 4 Youth who grew up in Aspen / No special consideration - children who return can occupy/inherit parents residence but
still have to qualify as FT work force - this is only fair
488 Castle Creek Drive 3 Develop 488 Castle Creek Dr as long-term rental housing asap
802 West Main Street 3 We need for sale units, 2-3 bedrooms for families with dogs
802 West Main Street 3 I would favor a lower density for rent program at 802 West Main St
802 West Main Street 3 I get the trade-offs, we need to balance the density at 802 West Main St
802 West Main Street 3 Good to mix city housing in all neighborhoods with free market. They will all be neighbors maintain higher standards.
802 West Main Street 3 Why be tunnel vision and believe we need to have single family houses. Look at Europe where land is so finite that the
way we reside is no longer possible to keep the kind of single house sites, multiple units
Housing Need 3 Do not build cat 1 & 2 units for sale
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 3 Need both long-term and seasonal rentals
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 3 Seasonal and long term rental tenants should not be asked to coexist in a new facility
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 3
We need more long term rental housing at an affordable cost. I am looking now and there is nothing! Who can pay
$3,000+ / month as a single mom, crazy. Let's support our community by helping place people when nothing is
available.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 3
Younger professionals w/ growing families (category 4) do not have any opportunities to buy. This problem can be
solved by giving incentives to people that own bigger houses (kids have moved out) and would want to downsize (by
exchange for smaller places) "trade program"
Miscellaneous 3 All visitors to Aspen perceive it to be a dog friendly City. Why can't employee housing be dog friendly? Especially if you
are purchasing not renting.
Miscellaneous 3 There need to be cooperation between the governments and the employer to help fill the needs for the seasonal
housing that is an important part of the local economy and it is not going to go away.
Miscellaneous 3 Preserve our character by keeping a balance of rental/for-sale units mixed in our whole community neighborhoods
build a better 'vibe'.
Miscellaneous 3 We are a non-profit and want to participate in employee housing, but cannot afford 100% subsidy. There must be
another way. What are the other options?
Miscellaneous 3 Get rid of snow dumb designers
EXHIBIT A P7
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
JULY 8, 2015
Miscellaneous 3 No turnover in 3-4 bedroom places. Need more.
Miscellaneous 3 Allow dogs
User Considerations 3 There should be some kind of accommodation for retirees or otherwise aging population
User Considerations 3 Support dogs being allowed at 50% of a facility
488 Castle Creek Drive 2 Develop both 488 Castle Creek and 517 Park Circle or 802 West Main St now / at the same time
517 Park Circle 2 The City grants so many height variances, why not grant itself a variance and build apartment units higher than code
(where it may not be too obtrusive) - 4 story bldg apartments
517 Park Circle 2 Develop 517 Park Circle as for sale housing asap
517 Park Circle 2 Develop 517 Park Circle as rental housing and then sell the units 10-15 years later when the lumber yard property is
redeveloped
517 Park Circle 2 I would favor a higher density for sale program at 517 Park Circle
802 West Main Street 2 Redevelop 802 West Main St as rental housing and then sell the units 10-15 years later when the lumber yard property
is redeveloped
802 West Main Street 2 Redevelop the 100 (studio) building at Truscott before developing 802 West Main St
802 West Main Street 2 I would favor a higher density for sale program at 802 West Main St
802 West Main Street 2 Site is too small for efficient development as multifamily, sell it
Employer Partnerships 2 Employers should be expected to help pay for housing
Employer Partnerships 2 Employers already do help pay for housing
Employer Partnerships 2 We would love the opportunity (to help pay for housing) - St Moritz. Start w/ 50% or $50,000 per
Employer Partnerships 2 Employers should not have to pay for housing / They are already creating jobs with challenges of attracting talent in
this difficult environment
For-Rent / For-Sale 2 seasonal for rent should be done next
For-Rent / For-Sale 2 We should look at condo conversion with long-term rentals to give opportunities to long term renters to be placed in
ownership housing
Housing Need 2 Rentals, seasonal town should have seasonal housing
Housing Need 2 Non-profit organizations should be allowed to purchase an employee housing unit for employee use, without having to
pay extra subsidy.
Housing Need 2 Rental units for lower categories - 1BR
Housing Need 2
All properties must be well constructed in the first place. Don't blame current owners for deferred maintenance when
buildings were inherently flawed from the time of construction. The problem continues from Centennial to Burlingame
- still should require minimum upkeep
Housing Need 2 Need to make it attractive for people in all categories to move up the ladder even to RO so that inventory becomes
available for new families/employees
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 2
Creating more ownership units should be a higher priority for us in general, but as for long-term or seasonal rentals,
long-term wins by a long shot, because the long term employee contributes to a more stable, invested, vital
community, and is more likely to volunteer, participate, vote, etc.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 2 Long-term and seasonal / free market rentals can be both
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 2 Long-term and seasonal / the cases should mix and inter-marry
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 2 Consider a co-op for HOAs to pool purchase of services like landscaping/plowing/accounting/legal
Miscellaneous 2 Like to see long term 1BR (and studio) for over age 65 in Aspen
Miscellaneous 2
Housing office should focus not primarily on putting forth new projects to develop but on making sure the existing
properties and systems are being run as efficiently as possible. Board and staff need to work together more
cooperatively. Staff and board need to move to make the case for the value add for employee housing to our
community, or else each time a property is to be added, there will be a policital battle over whyt we need it.
Miscellaneous 2
I understand the challenges of having dogs in rental units, but would really love to see opportunities for those who
purchase homes. We are very lucky to be homeowners in this fantastic place, but my family is disappointed that we
cannot have dogs.
Miscellaneous 2
I would like to see the homeowners requirements addrerss removing certain assets from net worth when applied to
category assignment. IF a hard earned 401K or IRA is applied to your net worth and puts you in a higher category, it
artifically inflates what you can afford thereby making you buy a more expensive unit. Obviously the 401K or IRA can
be used in an emergency, but at great expense.
Miscellaneous 2
Employee housing program is such a great contributor to the vitality of our town. We are so lucky to have this
farsighted option for families and young people to make a go of living here. Unfortunately there is a perception that
APCHA is not running a tight, efficient, and well-managed program. APCHA needs to focus on being the best-managed
organization it can be. Until the perception/reality improves, even on enforcement issues that may seem minor to
staff, the entire program will be undermined and doing anything new/developing new properties will be an uphill
battle.
Miscellaneous 2 APCHA needs to provide more support for HOAs to enforce delinquent homeowners in payment plans and support
evictions.
Miscellaneous 2 Close loopholes which allow private developers to avoid providing appropriate quantity of affordable housing, parking
and storage.
EXHIBIT A P8
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
JULY 8, 2015
Miscellaneous 2 Work hours (1500) and occupancy standards are too low. Raise 'em.
Miscellaneous 2 Non profits do not deserve exceptions since they are already tax exempt. They should be investing in improving
housing as much as for-profits
Miscellaneous 2 Develop ProBuild at ABC. High density ownership. Take the loss and build.
Miscellaneous 2 If it's meant to be for employees, need to not cater to retirees
Miscellaneous 2 More cat 3-6 2BR units
Miscellaneous 2
Work w/ government to consider 'free market trickle effects' like impact of AIRBNB/VRBO/ST RENTALS on affordable
free market rentals. Maybe zone only core for for these types of super short term rentals? Then these non-core
owners rent to locals and reduce pressure on APCHA
Miscellaneous 2 No more non-snow area living designers (Long term issues and more $)
Miscellaneous 2 Don't take lowest bids
User Considerations 2 Retirees should have clear and simple means to downgrade - move into smaller units
User Considerations 2 Trade out for smaller units. Have to make room for working families.
User Considerations 2 Youth who grew up in Aspen / just like everyone else
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Is 488 Castle Creek really big enough to house up to 52 people? Development should include bike path to AMFS
campus
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Develop 488 Castle Creek Dr as long-term rental housing asap - because it has a largest quantity
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Develop property at 517 Park Circle or 802 West Main St prior to developing this property
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Develop 488 Castle Creek as rental housing and then sell the units 10-15 years later when the lumber yard property is
redeveloped
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 We need for sale 2-3 beds for families
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Townhome units, yes please
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 No development at this site
517 Park Circle 1 Improve Centennial and build new. We need housing now!
517 Park Circle 1 Centennial is 92 units in desperate need - great location
517 Park Circle 1 (Do not improve) Centennial they own their own
517 Park Circle 1 At .33 of an acre, it's too small to build on
517 Park Circle 1 Height would not have a negative impact on neighbors
517 Park Circle 1 Buy (smuggler) tennis courts for a nice flat site for more housing
517 Park Circle 1 Develop 517 Park Circle as for sale and rental housing asap
517 Park Circle 1 Develop property at 488 Castle Creek or 802 West Main St prior to developing 517 Park Circle
517 Park Circle 1 Develop both 517 Park Circle and 488 Castle Creek or 802 West Main St now / at the same time
517 Park Circle 1 Need for sale units as well
517 Park Circle 1 Better location for busses and walking
517 Park Circle 1 Redevelop the 100 (studio) building at Truscott before developing 517 Park Circle / Same time, they need it
517 Park Circle 1 Need housing for families
517 Park Circle 1 For sale Cat 3-6 affordable for families with dogs
802 West Main Street 1 Just do something with it ASAP
802 West Main Street 1 Re-develop this property as seasonal rental housing ASAP
802 West Main Street 1 Good to mix seasonal and long term, balance
802 West Main Street 1 Develop rental housing at 517 Park Circle and 488 Castle Creek prior to developing 802 West Main St
802 West Main Street 1 No, do not develop rental housing at 517 Park Circle and 488 Castle Creek prior to developing 802 West Main St
802 West Main Street 1 Develop 802 West Main St and redevelop the 100 bilding at Truscott at the same time
802 West Main Street 1 No development at 802 West Main St
802 West Main Street 1 Parking? (refers to higher density scenarios)
802 West Main Street 1 Senior rentals
802 West Main Street 1 At .82 of an acre and .21 acre, these properties are way too small to build on - need space like Burlingame or Marolt
802 West Main Street 1 Look at the good job Peter Fornell did on a 7500 sq ft site next to Mesa Store Bakery (refers to 500 W Main)
802 West Main Street 1 These are both great sites for higher density rental, long or short, or purchase. Close to town. Walkable. New
urbanism. Friendly locations.
802 West Main Street 1 Why not make retiree housing walkable to town, single family near schools/arc, and 1-BR rentals for seasonal
802 West Main Street 1 Too much seasonal housing allows employers to drive down wages - build for community
802 West Main Street 1 School needs to get bigger with additional developments - already packed
802 West Main Street 1 Transit needs to be addressed with additional developments
802 West Main Street 1 Daycare needs to expand with additional developments
Employer Partnerships 1 Employers should help pay for housing via wages that allow for residency
Employer Partnerships 1 If employers could play lottery and buy for staff
EXHIBIT A P9
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
JULY 8, 2015
Employer Partnerships 1 Employers should not have to pay a subsidy in order to provide an employee with housing. Especially true for non
profits
Employer Partnerships 1 Allow employers to enter lottery
Employer Partnerships 1 Apply some of the taxes a business pays toward helping with rentals (tax credit?)
Employer Partnerships 1
Established long standing businesses should have priotity in rental pool. The businesses are collecting taxes, members
of ACRA and they need to keep and bring in employees that can stay. Sometimes this requires an immediate need for
a rental unit for a new employee. Without workforce in this resort city, Aspen will not survive.
Employer Partnerships 1 Check out and emulate P. Fornell's certificates.
Employer Partnerships 1 Give employers a deal on property/permits + require that housing be employee occupied
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 We need both (for sale / for rent)
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 Did the study take into account all the kids still in Aspen schools who will need a place to live when they get a job and
live here? They surely can't afford to buy. We need more rentals
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 need more than 300 affordable units
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 Long term for rent designed for retirees should be done next
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 lower category for sale should be done next
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 category 4 professionals for sale should be done next
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 for sale affordable should be done next
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 more 3-4 bedrooms for sale
For-Rent / For-Sale 1
many professionals are able to afford free market but choose not to - abuse the system because they can get more of
their 'wants' in subsidized housing than only getting needs in free market - i.e. garages or covered parking , yards,
playgrounds, decks, etc.
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 (Condo conversion) Only if responsible
Housing Need 1 YES we need more affordable housing options for our 20 somethings. Perhaps with the number of music students
dwindling we could make a few more full year round apts available at marolt or Burlingame?
Housing Need 1
As a program coordinator and senior staff member at the Buddy Program, I work with people from every single
demographic in Aspen and the valley - from some of the most wealthy year-round residents who have families to
some of the most impoverished families in the area and every age and economic category in between. Last month
alone, I lost a volunteer and a family to lack of housing - a 30-year-old smart, capable citizen who was contributing to
the health of our community - as well as a fantastic family who also contributed to the health of our community and
had two fantastic young girls. Both left the area because of lack of housing. Both have a dog, which was one major
reason why they couldn't find housing.
Housing Need 1 We had an employee leave us after two months of employment due to lack of affordable housing
Housing Need 1 No long range plan in place for retirees staying in the units forever - must be addressed. We can't just keep building
more
Housing Need 1 Rentals, for our needs. This summer we were $80,000 over budget fro housing
Housing Need 1 Feedback from local employees - CRITICAL
Housing Need 1 Over 80, fastest growing demographic in Aspen!
Housing Need 1
Seasonal housing and lower priced rentals is something that we will never build too much. The nature of our industry
depends on workers in the lower incomes. Without them we are in trouble. We should work with the employers to
accomplish the goal.
Housing Need 1 Employment growth is primarily driven by new development which provides its own mitigation plus government.
Housing Need 1 Trade with retirees to get them into smaller units, open up for more families. Renovate unit in between. Lower pricing
for smaller unit.
Housing Need 1 Too many people in affordable housing that don't belong there. Check assets.
Housing Need 1 Take care not to overpay for potential sites.
Housing Need 1 Only 2 seasonal complexes. Maroon Creek and Fritz Benedict. Need more.
Housing Need 1 There will always be a need. Just keep producing at a reasonable, steady rate. 100% should never be the goal.
Housing Need 1 We might experiement with a few less strict resale plans.
Housing Need 1 Need to take care of existing housing complexes - not build more.
Housing Need 1 They did a bad job at Burlingame - some in the first phase still haven't been signed off on.
Housing Need 1 We need to maintain the housing we already have
Housing Need 1 APCHA should get involved in or dictate reserve assessments for deed restricted associations
Housing Need 1 Board fiduciary accountability
Housing Need 1 Recourse through APCHA for governing docs non-compliance & financial non-performance
Housing Need 1 We need affordable housing. Cat 5, 6, 7 owners still can't resell & APCHA wants to force owners to lower their sale
price every month by 5% until it sells & lose their hard earned equity. This is absurd.
EXHIBIT A P10
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
JULY 8, 2015
Housing Need 1
I have lived here for 34 years. I wrote the AACP housing narrative in 1993. I do not want to create a rental-based
housing program. Community plan not workforce temp plan is the vision. One does not create a community out of
temp workers. Jefferson proposed giving every Virginian ownership of 5 acres. Give people ownership and they will
give you a community. Walk through neighborhoods of affordable housing and you will see what owners do to
improve their lives. No one ever washed a rental car. Compare landscaping at Truscott or Castle Ridge with Common
Ground or Snyder. You'll see.
Housing Need 1 Strongly Disagree - Problem is not renters. It's poor mgmt and enforcement. This is a ski town.
Housing Need 1 What is the process for repeating back to the community on the feedback gathered here tonight
Housing Need 1 Aspen needs a rental housing program. People who rent are just as much a part of the community as people who buy.
Kids who grew up here and want to work/live here and can't find affordable!
Housing Need 1 2-3 bedroom for sale for families
Housing Need 1 Build short term rental units - you have short term people
Housing Need 1 Build long term rental units - short term people will move into long term units. Some other short term people will
occupy their units
Housing Need 1 Build for-sale - long term rental will buy for-sale, short term will move into long term, and some other will occupy
short term
Housing Need 1 Build for-sale - This is the best possible solution as it will give greater choice.. If the money to spend is the same
Housing Need 1 Too many units are going to be housing retirees in the next 5 years
Housing Need 1 Some units housing retirees are multi-bedroom with only 1 retiree living in them
Housing Need 1 Retirees / After 34 years I should leave?
Housing Need 1
Retirees are important for the richness of the community. Considr what incentives might exist to encourage
downsizing. Affordable housing should be about building/maintaining the community. What kind of community tries
to push out / marginalize members who have contributed long enough to retire?
Housing Need 1 Sems like Aspen is about providing owner units subsidized by parents. Why does Aspen treat people who rent
(normally they rent because they can't afford on their $12-15 per hous job) as second class citizens?
Housing Need 1 For sale and rentals / not just rentals
Housing Need 1 Why did the City take a HOLD position on the Lumber Yard?
Housing Need 1 We need a lumber yard.
Housing Need 1 Yes, we need a lumber yard, but is there room for some housing there also? (materials right there! :)
Housing Need 1 All affordable, both rental and sale housing must have strong capital replacement funds + deferred maintenance funds
Housing Need 1 We've done way more than minimum (Centennial). Get facts at centennialdisclosed.org
Housing Need 1 Housing for sale for families 2-3 BR
Housing Need 1 Need to establish guidelines for future retiring workforce
Housing Need 1 New affordable housing built should be rentals designed for seniors to provide a safe place for seniors currently living
in employee housing, to move in
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Employer need to provide for much of their employees
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Ownership too stressful when many owners are too selfish. Can't get them to put funds in reserve funding! Never go
to meetings or add to community
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Long-term and seasonal / good to mix - maintain higher quality of building
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Long-term and seasonal / good to mix
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 What is so wrong with being a "seasonal"? - dishwashers need a place to live
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Needs in a housing unit differ for short vs. long term
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Adequate separation is needed (noise, etc.) / facility could serve the purpose of either long-term or seasonal housing
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Storage for long term needs are different i.e. either summer or winter
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Rental housing is more appropriate than for sale housing
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Rents must be adjusted with changes in AMI - Aspen controlled rents have grown more slowly than local AMI
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 New sale and rentals need to include lower incomes
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Rental properties seem to be advisable, especially since most owners are self serving and won't be agreeing to put
money into reserves
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Why not have a mgmt division of Housing Dept to enforce rules associations have in place?.. guiding them to properly
set reserve funding. Too many personalities in ownership - too much fighting and unfairness within groups.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 We need to open up homes who wish to rent - as was in the 60s and 70s. - losen some of the rules/codes
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 There need to be separate rental units for music school. It is depleting the inventory needed for full time employees in
Aspen.
EXHIBIT A P11
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
JULY 8, 2015
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Housing dept staff need to be more customer service oriented toward existing rental/purchase/HOAs
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 More credit should be given for upgrades put in a unit - should be done by an unbiased appraiser.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Figure out a way to find out all the income owners/renters have hidden in trust funds, don't deserve to be in
subsidized housing
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Not all people who are 'temps' move on - remember we are a resort town and many of our kids and adults who were
born here work in those jobs.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Investigate leaseholds, not sure it all needs to be rental or owned. Owned = tougher to monitor appropriate usage.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 How many of us started out as temps? - just going to be here for a season/year?
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Find a way to enforce minimum standards of upkeep for new and existing stock.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 In complex priority means an owner can take very poor care of their unit + trade up, leaving the problem to a
desperate new owner.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Need housing for professionals and couples, no kids.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Transparency when affordable unit is included in SF dwelling permit. Who rents? How much?
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 There are free market options - the problem is that the quality per $$ for subsidized/employee units FAR outweighs
the quality per $$ for free market.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1
There are many professional (bank president, doctor, architect, lawyer - are only 4 examples off the top of my head)
retirees or almost retirees who are in units that could have been purchased at a time in their lives when they started
out making less $$ - but as time went on their salaries increased but they choose to stay put and save $ so they can
rtire comfortably in Aspen. If a person qualifies at $65,000 or so per year, 15/20 years ago + now makes twice that do
they still qualify for the same category? This has happened at almost all complexes.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 So do we kick people out for saving money? I paid off my mortgage on my affordable unit. Do I need to move to a
more expensive unit and mortgage?
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1
City can't maintain the older inventory it has now - nor can we afford to keep building the top of the line amenities.
Build safe adequate but basic needs - not more high end amenities and lifestyles. No one has the right to fair /
subsidized housing - it's a privelege.
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Need tech talent here. Attract with affordable long term rentals, especially 1BR
Miscellaneous 1
Current employee housing owners should be required to a certain level of maintenance on their properties or forfeit
their right of appreciation. This pertains especially to owners that bought in the early stages and have not maintained,
yet their property value has increased exponentially and the upkeep has been minimal.
Miscellaneous 1 Agree, units cannot be allowed to deteriorate.
Miscellaneous 1 Agree, create incentives for owners to do this (maintain their property)
Miscellaneous 1 You can only maintain a certain amount until you realize what is needed is a rebuild. i.e. sold a defective property as in
the case of Centennial
Miscellaneous 1 How is $600K to $1M affordable housing?
Miscellaneous 1 Great job at Burlingame Phase II. We love it and the fantastic family setting.
Miscellaneous 1
My observation has been that when a family loves a pet, the love is as deep as a two-legged family member. It seems
essentially unfair that only those who are wealthy enough to buy a free-market home of their own have the
opportunity to experience this type of relationship because housing is unavailable to families with dogs. In the case of
the volunteer, she is a single woman who lives alone - her life is better and richer and, she feels, safer with her canine
companion.
Miscellaneous 1 I have two children of my own and earn a middle class income - there is not enough housing for the four of us to live in
Aspen - we basically have no choices beyond Burlingame, which frankly feels over-priced for the product.
Miscellaneous 1 Under $500K affordable
Miscellaneous 1
Important to "market" or use PR to make the whole community inclusing second home owners more aware of the
value of EH - maybe a campaign with testimonials "I am employee housing" so people see the impact of what the
program gives back in workers invested in town
Miscellaneous 1 (regarding assets/liabilities in qualifying) Account for certain necessary expenses also, eg daycare which is $12K per yr
Miscellaneous 1 (regarding assets/liabilities in qualifying) Children's college funds should be excluded from assets
Miscellaneous 1 Partner with Basalt entities to finish/develop senior housing on land under contract already
Miscellaneous 1 Schedule outreach on days which do not coincide with APCHA open houses.
Miscellaneous 1
Livable square footage is critical - whether it is high density or low density, rental or for purchase. Many of Aspen's AH
units can only fit a single bed, chair and desk. In Burlingame seasonal rental facility, it's always fun to wake up in the
morning , look out your window, and see you neighbor getting dressed.
Miscellaneous 1 What about their using private development such as those by F. Fornell to mitigate? This seems like a fine solution.
EXHIBIT A P12
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
JULY 8, 2015
Miscellaneous 1 Income categories need to be annually adjusted to keep track with annual changes in AMI. Rents and purchase prices
need to annually change consistent with changes in AMI. Adopt Federal change approach.
Miscellaneous 1 Incomes are higher in Aspen and controlled rents are lower versus Denver
Miscellaneous 1 Empty nesters should be able to have some priority to downsize if wanted
Miscellaneous 1 Perhaps a stronger enforcement dept to ensure units are correctly occupied
Miscellaneous 1 Non-profit employers should not be required to help pay for employee housing it purchases to be occupied by its
employees
Miscellaneous 1 All new developments must supply houisng for % of jobs they create. No exceptions
Miscellaneous 1
Vacancy tax? New free market homeowners paying into employye housing program for x% of time they do not live in
their Aspen home? Otherwise they will need to supply a small affordable rental unit on their property to rent to
qualified employee in Aspen
Miscellaneous 1 Keep ProBuild. Build above and next to
Miscellaneous 1 Proper governing docs creation, owner & board fiduciary accountability critical. APCHA must have more teeth.
Miscellaneous 1 Better when housing is mixed with free market
Miscellaneous 1 Rental as a stepping stone to buying. SO employees have a vested interest in our community
Miscellaneous 1 Balance subsidizing housing ownership and that type of financial situation with that same person having to maintain
the property at full price. These people can't have massive reserve requests as the only option.
Miscellaneous 1 Need more cat 2-3. Cat 5-7 won't sell and owners get stuck or lose money because because they bought above their
category. Why? Because that is the only ones that are easy to win in the lottery.
Miscellaneous 1 Please consider a trade program (incentive)
Miscellaneous 1 No Cat 1 & 2 for sale units - but need lots more 1-3 cat rentals
Miscellaneous 1 Disagree with no cat 1 & 2 for sale. Why should people of lesser means be relegated to rental status (2nd class). Is not
the american dream for all? Why not let them build equity?
Miscellaneous 1 No in-APCHA priority
Miscellaneous 1 Expand tiers, penalizing those who can save anything
Miscellaneous 1 If catering to retirees, survey retirees to determine desire to downsizing before proposing policy changes that penalize
other qualified applicants
Miscellaneous 1 Burlingame is not affordable for most of us. (And why no dogs?)
Miscellaneous 1
APCHA benefits for every unit $old. Can't treat HOA's/ Owners like it's free market system only when convenient, and
then control everything else we do. Can't expect current owners to pay for problems created by shoddy construction
30 years ago, and not be permitted to add to resale value, especially on a project which received no subsidies when it
was constructed.
Miscellaneous 1
Allow retirees to stay in units but facilitate and incentivize downsizing if the person wants to. These are the people
who built this town/community, literally + figuratively. They deserve the most respect! (I'm not a retiree - 20+ yrs to
go.)
Miscellaneous 1 In owned/HOA units personalities dictate more than common sense when it comes to following rules, collecting
unpaid dues - how can this be resolved? Our lack of leadership within the associations is a problem also.
Miscellaneous 1 Need more infill in Wdest End - SO dark and dead for most of the year. Why no interest in forest servcice parcels?
Miscellaneous 1 Need higher minimum standards for development (layour, features, etc.) of ADUs and affordable housing
Miscellaneous 1 Hire local designers
Miscellaneous 1 Develop several properties simultaneously
Miscellaneous 1 Need GC on staff for educated input on design
Miscellaneous 1 Better oversight of procedures and materials during construction
Miscellaneous 1 Good parking plan (Callahan court)
Miscellaneous 1 Need better snow removal consideration
Miscellaneous 1 City plowing streets into private areas doesn't work
Miscellaneous 1 Private affordable rentals need to go back in pool for availability to all
Miscellaneous 1
Upkeep existing properties ex. the large lodge by North Star Reserve that is vacant, is an absolutely beautiful location,
but empty & rundown. Financially assist older employee housing (Hunter Creek-Solar voltaic system on roof to
upgrade boilers of employee buildings, Centennial-overhang roofs to prevent continued damage). A certain percent
should be planned to upkeep for needs 20 yrs after being built and every 10 years following for all employee housing.
What type of upkeep would be unique to that properties needs. If sold affordable need to be maintained affordable
too.
EXHIBIT A P13
I.
ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED
JULY 8, 2015
Miscellaneous 1
Currently you have a pool of each. Some people are happy to be owners and some are happy to rent. If you build 100
rentals then 100-200 workers will rent them. If you build 100 for sale, and with enough demand, you will sell
everything to people who live and work in the area. Mostly to people who currently rent. Their place will be taken by
the same 100-200 people who are looking for rentals. This will give better opportunities not only for the people who
are trying to rent, but for the people who are trying to buy. The demand(For Sale) is something that you have to figure
out, but with the prices going higher on the free market, I believe you will not have any problems with that. In
addition, owners are more responsible toward the community. The lots that will be developed are knitted into the
community. Imagine seasonal workers living there. For Sale wins!
Miscellaneous 1
1BD vs 3BD. All 3 properties should be developed as 1BD. You currently have many 3BD apartments and I presume
that Burlingame will add some more(hopefully category 3 and 4 only). You probably have some demographics
information for the area, but there was always more people on the wait list for 1BD than 3BD apartments. Also in the
future, many of the owners that will stay in the area will not have the children living with them any longer. Some will
retire. You should give priority and incentives to these people to downsize to a beautiful 1BD apartment if they don’t
need these extra rooms. In such cases, some of the requirements can be waived and even give them credits for their
closing/sale costs. You will get 3BD apartments in the future, by paying for 1BD today. Build more 3 BD and people
will not have a place to downsize to or couples will not be able to own. 1BD wins!
User Considerations 1 "Qualified" is a loaded term - qualified for full time in the service industry? Public/private sector?
User Considerations 1 Aspen rental housing should be available for people who actually work in Aspen, why live in New Castle?
User Considerations 1 for qualified workforce only / Needs more studies to determine. Town needs lower costs for visitors too!
User Considerations 1 more flexibility for retirees to rent/sublease to qualified employees
User Considerations 1
Retirees should only be allowed to keep their purchased units if they prove they are still contributing to Pitkin County -
Volunteer positions. They should also be required to upkeep their units to a certain lelvel - either stipulated by an
economic level or an annual inspection
User Considerations 1 Retirees have already contributed to community
User Considerations 1 Retirees should be allowed to remain in their units provided they maintain occupancy requirements
User Considerations 1 Looks like the youth are those who create problems and don't keep up their units.
User Considerations 1 Downgrading / Costs more than keeping what they now have.
User Considerations 1 Retirees / This is their community and provision should exist to accommodate them
User Considerations 1 Youth who grew up in Aspen / should compete just like 'newbies'. They already have the advantage of parents here.
User Considerations 1 Youth who grew up in Aspen / one of the hardest groups to place. Family here but too hard to get secure w/ well
paying job
User Considerations 1 Dogs 100% / There should be a limit of animals, maybe 1 dog and 1 cat. There are very few places where people with
dogs can live
User Considerations 1 Dogs 100% / Good enforcement is needed
User Considerations 1 Dogs 100% / enforcement is not realistic
User Considerations 1 Dogs 50% / No, maybe 10%
User Considerations 1 Dogs 50% / No, how would you regulate? Paying someone to do this is wasteful
User Considerations 1 Incentive program for some families (kids grown and moved out) to trade into smaller places
User Considerations 1 Better system for verifying qualifications / involve HOAs
Total comments 616
Total participants 60
EXHIBIT A P14
I.
All Comments Received
August 6, 2015
TOPIC QUANTITY COMMENT
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Great location for high density / seasonal housing, however concerned with that many cars (33?!),
using Castle Creek for egress at a curve in the road
517 Park Circle 1 Highest Util. is 16 units on duplex lot $285,000 per FTE
517 Park Circle 1 Lowest util. is 10 front doors on a duplex lot $321,000 per FTE
517 Park Circle 1 No private developers ever get that densitty of FAR
517 Park Circle 1 Highest and best use of this property would be to sell and repurpose the funds toward housing
elsewhere
517 Park Circle 1 This property is not appropriate for 10-16 front doors
517 Park Circle 1 Parking is extremely limited on this street.
517 Park Circle 1 Even though these are 1BR units, you may have couples living here with 2 cars. Every one of these
plans needs more parking.
517 Park Circle 1 A 3 story bldg (16 units) would be out of place for this location
802 West Main Street 1 This a "visual gateway" property, entering and leaving town, so excellent architect is a must
802 West Main Street 1 Egress out of town from 802 West Main would be difficult
802 West Main Street 1 Highest utilization 21 FTE's @ cat2 = $303,000 per FTE
802 West Main Street 1 Mid Utilization 17.5 @ cat2 = $365,000 per FTE
802 West Main Street 1 1999 agreement with Savanah limits density at this site (reference to P&Z reso 09-1999)
802 West Main Street 1 Too much densiy in 2 block area
802 West Main Street 1 How much more poor architecture can we stand?
802 West Main Street 1 Circulation issue in alley and access onto 7th
802 West Main Street 1 Existing house should be taken down
802 West Main Street 1 Utilization should be far lower than 8 units. 4 nice for sale residences maybe
802 West Main Street 1 No rentals
802 West Main Street 1 Concern about foot traffic through Aspen Villas to the bus stop at 82/Hallam & 8th
802 West Main Street 1 Don't care to turn the whole neighborhood into an affordable housing enclave
802 West Main Street 1 If it's well designed, a high density project in most locations is appropriate and well received
802 West Main Street 1 7th and Main and Benedict Commons are good examples of well designed dense projects
802 West Main Street 1
I live at the corner of 8th and W. Bleeker street and my house shares the alley with the Bavarian AH
project and 802 w. main st. I am happy with my neighbors and enjoy them and their kids. Our
neighborhood has vitality year round and we like it. So my comments are in no way against AH. My
primary concern is the density that might be placed on 802 and the impact of more people and their
cars on the neighborhood.
802 West Main Street 1
On-site parking must be provided sufficient to support the approved density. The neighborhood
already experiences parking impacts along Main Street (extended to the west of 7th street), where
people who do not live in the neighborhood (and some who do) park commercial vehicles, trucks,
campers, trailers and vehicles for sale. These often spill over onto W. Bleeker street since there is
barely enough parking for the villas and West Bleeker town homes projects.
802 West Main Street 1
It is my sense that no more than six units would be appropriate on this site and that there should be at
least one on-site parking space per bedroom (up to 2 spaces per unit). That ought to achieve a
reasonable density for this property. There are safety reasons as well since the kids play in the alley - it
is their park.
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 Rent now. Sale later.. But continual
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 All future affordable housing needs to be rentals. Parking needs to be provided for these units.
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 I would refer all to the Innmt (sp?), seasonal rental units…
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 Either or both sale & rent
Housing Need 1 Aspen needs more senior housing
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Summer non-profit organizations, such as AMF&S, need reasonably priced rentals, both for students
and faculty members.
Miscellaneous 1 Employee housing as 'travel mitigation' and 'maintaining community'. Lg employers should help $ for
their employees. Disperse it around town. Allow owners to AirBnB
Miscellaneous 1 Housing needs to have good sound proofing and storage
Miscellaneous 1 Down valley bus stops need to more parking. Cars are not going away
Total Comments 36
Total Participants 10
EXHIBIT A P15
I.
All Comments Received
August 27, 2015
TOPIC QUANTITY COMMENT
Housing Need 9 The City should develop affordable rental housing at 802 West Main, 517 Park Circle and 488 Castle Creek
488 Castle Creek Drive 5 Support "Higher Utilization" scenario with 32 units at 488 Castle Creek
802 West Main Street 5 Redevelop 802 W Main St as both long term and seasonal rental housing asap
For-Rent / For-Sale 5 Both long term and seasonal housing should be done next
802 West Main Street 4 Support "Higher Utilization" scenario with 12 units at 802 W Main St
488 Castle Creek Drive 3 Develop 488 Castle Creek as both long term and seasonal rental housing asap
517 Park Circle 3 Support "Higher Utilization" scenario with 16 units at 517 Park Circle
802 West Main Street 3 Redevelop 802 W Main St as long term rental housing asap
488 Castle Creek Drive 2 Develop 488 Castle Creek as seasonal rental housing asap
517 Park Circle 2 Should be lower density, borders rural (wildlife) area + adjacent to single family residence
517 Park Circle 2 Develop 517 Park Circle as both long term and seasonal rental housing asap
517 Park Circle 2 Support "Mid Utilization" scenario with 13 units at 517 Park Circle
802 West Main Street 2 Why one-bedroom? Should be 2. More people housed. Less density. More felxible living arrangements.
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 488 Castle Creek should be done first. Why? More units
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Utilize slope to build part of apt. below site line.
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Can cars use Marolt Pl. road for access to property?
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Build in-town housing first
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Best choice of the three properties for seasonal housing
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 2-4 bdrms should be here
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Develop housing at 802 Main or 517 Park Circle prior to developing 488 Castle Creek
488 Castle Creek Drive 1 Redevelop 100 building (studio) at Truscott before developing 488 Castle Creek
517 Park Circle 1 sell the land and find less expensive land elsewhere on a per unit basis
517 Park Circle 1 Negative use of the space
517 Park Circle 1 We spent a year re-zoning the adjacent property
517 Park Circle 1 Don't think it's a good use of the real estate
517 Park Circle 1 Area would be better as a public park
517 Park Circle 1 We don't live here to be in an urban setting.. No yard .. No sun
517 Park Circle 1 Too dense
517 Park Circle 1 Good location for worker housing, but why only 1 bedrooms?
517 Park Circle 1 We need 2 bedroom rentals - makes more sense for different rental situations
517 Park Circle 1 Develop 517 Park Circle as long term rental housing asap
517 Park Circle 1 Develop housing at 802 W Main St or 488 Castle Creek prior to developing 517 Park Circle
517 Park Circle 1 Redevelop 100 building (studio) at Truscott before developing 517 Park Circle
517 Park Circle 1 I would like to know what the anticipated property value impact would be? (adjacent homeowner)
517 Park Circle 1 What is the current zoning?
517 Park Circle 1 How long do you anticipate to complete construction?
517 Park Circle 1 What happened to the park plans discussed when the city purchased the property from Rich Wagar?
517 Park Circle 1 How would the EPA superfund dirt that is underneath the topsoil be mitigated?
517 Park Circle 1 How would the utilities that pass underneath our backyard to that address be upgraded to service that many
units? (adjacent homeowner)
517 Park Circle 1 There is a blind curve on the southbound side of Park Cir at that address. Would the city consider lowering the
speed limit or put in place some other protections for pedestrians?
517 Park Circle 1 Would there be any disruption of service on the Hunter Creek Bus loop?
517 Park Circle 1 Our preference is the city develop properties currently zoned for high density or put the efforts into the 100
Building at Truscott and leave 517 Park Cir undeveloped or as a small city park.
517 Park Circle 1
If 404 Park Ave gets the green light for redevelopment and there is any overlap with the 517 Park Cir project,
construction activity will have a negative impact on the neighborhood. Smuggler Mountain recreational use has
grown exponentially over the past years, the potential for a mishap will only grow
802 West Main Street 1 It's in the City proper
802 West Main Street 1 Suggest creative design that maximizes development potential (pato units, staggered heights, etc.)
802 West Main Street 1 Redevelop 802 W Main St as rental housing and then sell the units 10-15 years later when the lumber yard
property is redeveloped
802 West Main Street 1 Redevelop 100 building (studio) at Truscott before developing 802 W Main St
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 60% Seasonal Rentals 40% for local sale
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 Pet friendly long term (not seasonal)
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 More rentals needed for our local kids
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 Seasonal housing should be done next
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 For sale housing should be done next
For-Rent / For-Sale 1 Nothing should be done. Let local businesses figure this out on their own
EXHIBIT A P16
I.
All Comments Received
August 27, 2015
Housing Need 1 Less talk, more action
Housing Need 1 Need for 1BRs (700 sq ft) + 2 BRs (1100 sq ft)
Housing Need 1 Need 4 BR seasonal units (1200 Sq ft)
Housing Need 1 Built all project asap w greatest capacity / 1 BRs
Housing Need 1
With evidence that need for housing is there (and of every type and category), do comprehensive analysis of
census data, existing inventory, historical housing patterns, and opportunities to create housing - in order to move
forward with proper knowledge
Housing Need 1 If we had 100 additional seasonal beds or another club commons, we could fill them
Housing Need 1 Would be great to have more rentals and sales in Aspen
Housing Need 1 What is City doing to determine demand for these types of rentals?
Housing Need 1 Need housing for middle class families
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Let Skico / Music School provide for seasonal (largest need for them)
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Seasonal often bec0ome full time. 50% rentals at Castle Creek - largest project w 2 persons/unit requirement
Long-term / Seasonal Rental 1 Need 2BR long term rentals, 3-4 BR short term (club commons), not 1 BR
Miscellaneous 1 Becausae of "emotional support" animals, all housing allows pets
Miscellaneous 1 Take part in the major rebuilding of "poor construction" such as Centennial
Miscellaneous 1 Put your money where you mouth is - keep affordable housing affordable
Miscellaneous 1 HOA "ABC's" from beginning - reference good examples (MPCA e.g.)
Miscellaneous 1 Rehab slum housing stock
Miscellaneous 1 Allow dogs and charge a refundable fee for cleanup
Miscellaneous 1 Flexible floor plans
Miscellaneous 1 Clean up toxic soil
Miscellaneous 1 Keep cats inside
Miscellaneous 1 I am stunned at the costs, commonly over $1,000 / sq ft and much more on lower density versions
Miscellaneous 1 While most people seem to support higher density, the proposed levels of up to 48 units per acre is
Miscellaneous 1 I assume rit is land costs that drive the prices. Perhaps selling high value land and buying further from the center
may be a good idea
Total Comments 111
Total Participants 35
EXHIBIT A P17
I.
Strategic Review of Housing 15
Not surprisingly, the largest focus for affordable housing need for Pitkin County is in
Categories 1 – 4. However, note the sizable number of households with income levels
greater than the current maximum for Category 7. Of the aggregate 1,209 households
with income greater than allowable income maximum, many could still qualify for
affordable housing, provided countable assets remain below $900,000. Since no
published asset data exists for Pitkin County by income bracket, it is not possible to
discern what number of this population is still eligible for RO housing without a survey.
NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS RELATIVE TO POPULATION BY CATEGORY
THRESHOLDS
The chart below portrays that there is a positive correlation in the number of APCHA
affordable housing units (rental and ownership) relative to the Pitkin County population.
However, one exception to this correlation is certainly true for Category 1 – at this time,
it is unknown why there is such a large number of Category 1 households and where
those households are residing given the limited number of affordable housing units.
Source: Unit counts from APCHA rental & ownership inventory; household count from Table 8
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Category 6 Category 7 Other TOSV Stock 224 120 125 119 13 17 16 123 Current Ownership Stock 20 158 218 505 17 67 4 512 Current Rental Stock 94 291 425 32 - - - 272 Households By Category 2,190 1,178 1,221 1,164 130 165 160 1,209 Qualified Households that Applied (since 2006) 235 372 411 320 14 9 11 56
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Current Rental Stock Current Ownership Stock TOSV Stock Households By Category Qualified Households that Applied (since 2006)
EXHIBIT B P18
I.
Strategic Review of Housing 16
In addition to the APCHA housing stock reflected in the preceding chart, the Town of
Snowmass Village (TOSV) also has its own separate stock of affordable rentals
(247units), for-sale units (177 units), and employer-owned staff and caretaker units (333
units). As the criteria used by Snowmass Village does not specifically correspond to the
categories noted within APCHA guidelines, the additional 757 TOSV units included in
the chart below have been allocated on a basis similar to the overall household
demographics for Pitkin County – this is merely an assumption on how to reflect these
additional units, and can be adjusted.
Source: Unit counts from APCHA rental & ownership inventory and Town of Snowmass Village Housing
Manager; household count from Table 8
EXHIBIT B P19
I.
Strategic Review of Housing 17
Not all RO properties are “high dollar”:
The table above reflects “categorizing” the rental and ownership RO units from previous
chart into applicable categories based on the Pitkin County Assessor’s Office listed actual
values. By redistributing the RO inventory in the “applicable” income and asset
categories, we can more accurately display what populations these RO units are
attempting to support. Remaining RO inventory in the table above reflects current
ownership units with property values above $600,000.
What do these charts tell us?
What might you conclude or wonder from looking at these graphs:
The solid black line represents Pitkin County households not Pitkin County
worker households which we know is greater.
Cat 1 households are finding places to live – but not necessarily in APCHA
housing.
Does that large spike in category 1 households really represent working
households?
People might not report all their income.
People might have assets and small income.
There is little need to create category 5-7 housing. We should concentrate on
developing housing in the Cat 1-4 ranges – there appears to be little demand
and sufficient supply for Cat 5-7 units. Until down-valley prices rise to the
levels we saw prior to the market crash of 2008, or until ASD moves to
severely limit out of district enrollment for down-valley Aspen workers, there
appears to be no reason to concentrate much resources on providing Cat 5-7
units.
There appears to be a need for category 1-4 housing (Cat 1 rental housing, as it is
problematic to purchase at even a Cat 1 level).
What you probably should not take away from these graphs:
Do not hastily assume a huge need for category 1 housing until this data can be
better understood.
Dotted line is a 6 yr aggregate and may be more of an indication of the shape of
the demand curve rather than a snapshot of demand.
Dotted line is based on what's is available for sale and thus, particularly in the
case of category 1, should not be assumed as an indication of demand
EXHIBIT B P20
I.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 1 of 14P21I.
Up
d
a
t
e
:
B
u
r
l
i
n
g
a
m
e
R
a
n
c
h
P
h
a
s
e
2
FU
T
U
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
!
95
%
O
C
C
U
P
I
E
D
10
0
%
O
C
C
U
P
I
E
D
S
I
N
C
E
2
0
0
7
CONSTRUCTION NOT YET STARTED
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 2 of 14P22I.
20
1
5
S
t
a
r
t
201? End
1.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
s
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
2 2 .
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
3.
S
t
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
4.
D
e
s
i
g
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
/
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
5.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
/
/ De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
6.
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
7.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
i
t
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
8.
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
/
O
v
e
r
s
i
g
h
t
9.
O
c
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
RO
A
D
T
O
T
H
E
N
E
X
T
C
I
T
Y
O
F
A
S
P
E
N
A
F
F
O
R
D
A
B
L
E
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
We
’
r
e
e
he
r
e
r e .
We
r
e e
er
h e re
.
Wh
e
n
i
s
i
t
g
o
i
n
g
t
o
b
e
b
u
i
l
t
?
Wh
e
n
is
it
g oi
n
g to
be
bu
i
l
t
?
We
d
o
n
’
t
k
n
o
w
w
h
a
t
“
i
t
”
i
s
u
n
t
i
l
w
e
g
e
t
e t
he
r
e
re
.
St
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
s
m
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
9
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
9
Co
u
n
t
y
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
r
s
9
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
9
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
F
r
o
n
t
i
e
r
s
9
P&
Z
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 3 of 14P23I.
20
1
2
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
&
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
(
E
P
S
)
S
t
u
d
y
Ti
m
e
l
i
n
e
o
f
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
=
2
0
1
2
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
2
2 2 02
2
Go
a
l
o
f
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
6
0
%
o
f
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
i
s
n
o
t
i
n
t
h
e
2
0
1
0
A
A
C
P
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
y ab
o
u
t
4
7
%
o
f
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
h
o
u
s
e
d
d d
lo
c
a
l
l
y
a
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
5
3
%
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
Fr
o
m
2
0
0
1
t
o
2
0
0
9
,
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
i
n
A
s
p
e
n
g
r
e
w
+
0
.
4
%
.
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
t
w
o
r
e
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
s
.
Ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
:
Ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
:
j
Wh
a
t
w
o
u
l
d
i
t
t
a
k
e
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
a
n
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
c
o
m
m
u
t
i
n
g
b
y
2
0
2
2
?
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
j
o
b
g
r
o
w
t
h
o
f
0
.
5
%
w
o
u
l
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
b
o
u
t
5
2
6
n
e
w
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
h
o
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
s
ea
t
e
ab
o
u
t
52
6
ne
w
em
p
l
o
y
e
e
(4
7
%
=
2
4
7
h
o
u
s
e
d
l
o
c
a
l
l
y
)
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
o
f
1
6
0
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
f
r
e
e
m
a
r
k
e
t
u
n
i
t
s
l
o
s
t
t
o
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
un
i
t
s
lo
s
t
to
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
(1
6
0
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
1
0
0
%
)
EP
S
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
3
6
7
u
n
i
t
s
w
i
l
l
h
o
u
s
e
n
e
w
r
e
t
i
r
e
e
s
.
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
l
o
w
e
r
e
d
t
h
i
s
EP
S
es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
36
7
un
i
t
s
wi
l
l
ho
u
s
e
ne
w
re
t
i
r
e
e
s
.
Th
e
E es
t
i
m
a
t
e
t
o
2
5
0
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
a
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
t
u
d
y
.
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
st
u
d
y
.
(2
5
0
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
1
0
0
%
)
Co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
:
C o n c l u s i o n
To
t
a
l
o
f
n :
u s i o n
of
o f
65
7
:7 7
ne
w
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
a
r
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
2
0
1
2
t
o
2
0
2
2
.
Th
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
A
s
p
e
n
h
a
s
t
h
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
t
o
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
a
b
o
u
t
3
8
0
u
n
i
t
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
t
h
i
s
g
o
a
l
.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
of
As
p
e
n
ha
s
th
e
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
to
pr
o
d
u
c
e
ab
o
u
t
38
0
un
i
t
s
towa
yp
p
y
p
yp
p
y
p
Si
n
c
e
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
u
d
y
,
ab
o
u
t
1
0
0
u
n
i
t
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
.
y y y ,
p p p
ST
R
A
T
E
G
I
C
R
E
V
I
E
W
O
F
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 4 of 14P24I.
FE
E
D
B
A
C
K
F
R
O
M
L
O
C
A
L
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
R
S
2014/15
“W
e
a
r
e
s
t
a
r
t
i
n
g
t
o
s
e
e
t
r
e
n
d
s
o
f
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
,
n
o
t
j
u
s
t
i
n
A
s
p
e
n
,
b
u
t
i
n
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
v
a
l
l
e
y
.
.
i
t
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
qu
i
t
e
d
i
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
t
o
f
i
l
l
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
.
f
o
r
b
o
t
h
s
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
l
o
n
g
t
e
r
m
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
.
”
“W
e
h
a
d
a
n
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
l
e
a
v
e
u
s
a
f
t
e
r
t
w
o
m
o
n
t
h
s
o
f
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
d
u
e
t
o
l
a
c
k
o
f
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
.
”
“I
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
t
h
a
t
6
o
f
o
u
r
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
f
r
o
m
a
n
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
t
h
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
r
e
n
t
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
”
“R
e
n
t
a
l
s
,
f
o
r
o
u
r
n
e
e
d
s
.
T
h
i
s
s
u
m
m
e
r
,
w
e
w
e
r
e
$
8
0
,
0
0
0
o
v
e
r
b
u
d
g
e
t
f
o
r
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
.
”
"M
y
b
e
l
i
e
f
i
s
t
o
w
a
i
t
o
n
m
o
r
e
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
-ta
k
e
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
o
f
w
h
a
t
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
L
a
r
g
e
h
o
t
e
l
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
o
n
si
t
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
r
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
.
”
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 5 of 14P25I.
?
F
O
R
-
S
A
L
E
o
r
F
O
R
-
R
E
N
T
?
Wh
y
n
e
w
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
?
y ••
La
t
e
s
t
g
st
st
u
d
y
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
C
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
a
r
o
u
n
d
3
0
0
0
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
•
La
t
e
s
L
st
ud
y
s
st
L
•••
Nu
m
e
r
o
u
s
su
g
g
e
s
t
s
C
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
a
r
o
u
n
d
3
0
0
su
g
g
e
s
t
s
Ci
t
y
ne
e
d
s
to
pr
o
d
u
c
e
ar
o
u
0
ff
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
af
y dy
s
s s
ar
t
i
c
l
e
s
a
n
d
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
t
a
l
k
i
n
g
a
b
o
u
t
a
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
r
e
n
t
a
l
s
h
o
r
t
a
g
e
•
Nu
m
e
r
N N
•••
Ne
w
ro
u
s
rt
i
c
l
e
s
an
d
em
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
ta
l
k
i
n
g
ab
o
u
t
a cu
r
r
e
n
t
re
n
t
a
l
sh
o
r
t
a
g
e
a r
me
r
w w
re
n
t
a
l
s
f
o
r
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
h
a
v
e
n
o
t
b
e
e
n
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
i
n
A
s
p
e
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
y
y
e
a
r
s
•
Ne
w
N
w r e
N
•••
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
al
s
fo
r
ge
n
e
r
a
l
wo
r
k
f
en
t
a
e g g g
Re
n
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
F
u
l
l
•
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
E E
•••
Ab
o
u
t
en
t
a
l
F
Re
ng g R
t t
10
0
F
o
r
ta
l
F
o o
-
a c i l i t i e s F u l l
F a
a l F
r r --Sa
l
e
A
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
C
o
n
d
o
s
R
e
c
e
n
t
l
y
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
•
A b o u
A A
•••
Th
e
r
e
00
F o
0
o r
al
e
A
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
C
Sa S
u t 1
e e
ar
e
a
b
o
u
t
2
5
0
m
o
r
e
f
o
r
bl
e
C
o
-
Co
n
d
o
C
le
C
r -sa
l
e
os
R
e
c
e
n
t
l
y
C
o
m
p
on
d
o
e
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
u
n
i
t
s
pl
e
t
e
d
om
p
s
th
a
n
d
et
e
d
n
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
r
e
n
t
a
l
al
un
i
t
s
re r e e e e
re
a
b
o
u
t
2
5
0
m
o
r
e
f
o
r e
a b o
r e
o ou
t
2
5
0
m
o
r
e
f
o
ou
t
2
ou
t
ar a r
o o r r --
al
e
al
e
a a s s
e e
ff
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
un
i
t
f f o r d a b l e
u n i t
af a f
s s
ha
n
ha
n
th t h
n n
ff
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
r
e
n
t
a
f f o r
af a f
al
ni
t
s
un
In
y
o
u
r
o
p
i
n
i
o
n
,
w
h
a
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
o
n
e
n
e
x
t
?
FO
R
-
R
E
N
T
Lo
n
g
-
T
e
r
m
:
Se
a
s
o
n
a
l
:
Bo
t
h
:
FO
R
-
S
A
L
E
No
t
h
i
n
g
.
L
e
t
l
o
c
a
l
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
f
i
g
u
r
e
t
h
i
s
o
u
t
on
t
h
e
i
r
o
w
n
.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 6 of 14P26I.
Ci
t
y
-
O
w
n
e
d
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
o
r
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Th
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
A
s
p
e
n
o
w
n
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
f
o
r
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
t
:
Th
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
A
s
p
e
n
o
w
n
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
f
o
r
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
d
e
v
e
l
o
48
8
C
a
s
t
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
8
0
2
W
e
s
t
M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
5
1
7
opmen velo 7 7 Park nt at:men k k Circle
Sh
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
e
s
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
?
YE
S
:
N
O
:
Th
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
h
a
s
d
e
c
i
d
e
d
t
o
t
a
k
e
a
H
O
L
D
po
s
i
t
i
o
n
o
n
t
h
e
L
u
m
b
e
r
Y
a
r
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
n
e
a
r
t
e
r
m
.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 7 of 14P27I.
8
51
7
P
a
r
k
C
i
r
c
l
e
La
n
d
A
r
e
a
:
.
3
3
A
c
r
e
/
1
4
.
4
K
S
q
F
t
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
:
“
N
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
o
f
A
s
p
e
n
”
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
9
Wa
l
k
/
R
i
d
e
/
B
u
s
Ne
a
r
b
y
A
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
:
9
Mi
d
l
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
9
Ce
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
51
7
P
a
r
k
C
i
r
c
l
e
No
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
As
p
e
n
A
r
e
a
Wh
i
c
h
i
s
C
L
O
S
E
S
T
t
o
y
o
u
r
p
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
?
De
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
s
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
s
s
o
o
n
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
Lo
n
g
T
e
r
m
?
S
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
?
B
o
t
h
?
De
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
t
8
0
2
M
a
i
n
o
r
4
8
8
C
a
s
t
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
de
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
i
s
a
s
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
h
e
n
s
e
l
l
t
h
e
u
n
i
t
s
1
0
-
1
5
y
e
a
r
s
la
t
e
r
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
l
u
m
b
e
r
y
a
r
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
i
s
r
e
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
.
Re
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
e
1
0
0
(
s
t
u
d
i
o
)
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
t
T
r
u
s
c
o
t
t
b
e
f
o
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 8 of 14P28I.
9
80
2
W
e
s
t
M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
La
n
d
A
r
e
a
:
.
2
1
A
c
r
e
/
9
K
S
q
F
t
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
:
“
N
o
r
t
h
W
e
s
t
E
n
d
”
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
9
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
9
Wa
l
k
/
R
i
d
e
/
B
u
s
Ne
a
r
b
y
A
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
:
9
7t
h
a
n
d
M
a
i
n
9
Ba
v
a
r
i
a
n
C
o
n
d
o
s
9North West End Area
80
2
W
e
s
t
M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
Wh
i
c
h
i
s
C
L
O
S
E
S
T
t
o
y
o
u
r
p
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
?
Re
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
s
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
s
s
o
o
n
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
Lo
n
g
T
e
r
m
?
S
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
?
B
o
t
h
?
De
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
t
5
1
7
P
a
r
k
C
i
r
c
l
e
o
r
4
8
8
C
a
s
t
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
p
r
i
o
r
to
r
e
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
Re
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
i
s
a
s
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
h
e
n
s
e
l
l
t
h
e
u
n
i
t
s
1
0
-
1
5
ye
a
r
s
l
a
t
e
r
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
l
u
m
b
e
r
y
a
r
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
i
s
r
e
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
.
Re
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
e
1
0
0
(
s
t
u
d
i
o
)
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
t
T
r
u
s
c
o
t
t
b
e
f
o
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 9 of 14P29I.
10
48
8
C
a
s
t
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
D
r
i
v
e
10
La
n
d
A
r
e
a
:
.
8
2
A
c
r
e
/
3
6
K
S
q
F
t
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
:
“
L
o
w
e
r
C
a
s
t
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
”
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
9
AV
H
/
H
H
S
9
Wa
l
k
/
R
i
d
e
/
B
u
s
Ne
a
r
b
y
A
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
:
9
Ca
s
t
l
e
R
i
d
g
e
9
Ma
r
o
l
t
S
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
Wh
i
c
h
i
s
C
L
O
S
E
S
T
t
o
y
o
u
r
p
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
?
De
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
s
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
s
s
o
o
n
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
Lo
n
g
T
e
r
m
?
S
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
?
B
o
t
h
?
De
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
t
5
1
7
P
a
r
k
C
i
r
c
l
e
o
r
8
0
2
M
a
i
n
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
de
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
i
s
a
s
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
h
e
n
s
e
l
l
t
h
e
u
n
i
t
s
1
0
-
1
5
y
e
a
r
s
la
t
e
r
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
l
u
m
b
e
r
y
a
r
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
i
s
r
e
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
.
Re
-
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
e
1
0
0
(
s
t
u
d
i
o
)
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
t
T
r
u
s
c
o
t
t
b
e
f
o
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
i
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
48
8
C
a
s
t
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 10 of 14P30I.
Do
y
o
u
a
g
r
e
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
n
e
e
d
f
o
r
l
o
n
g
-te
r
m
r
e
n
t
a
l
s
ou
t
w
e
i
g
h
s
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
f
o
r
s
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
r
e
n
t
a
l
s
?
Do
y
o
u
a
g
r
e
e
t
h
a
t
s
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
l
o
n
g
-te
r
m
r
e
n
t
a
l
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
sh
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
a
s
k
e
d
t
o
c
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
a
n
e
w
r
e
n
t
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
?
Gi
v
e
n
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
f
l
o
o
r
pl
a
n
,
do
y
o
u
t
h
i
n
k
a
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
c
o
u
l
d
s
e
r
v
e
th
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
e
i
t
h
e
r
s
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
o
r
l
o
n
g
-te
r
m
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
?
Lo
n
g
-
T
e
r
m
/
S
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
R
e
n
t
a
l
s
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 11 of 14P31I.
If
r
e
n
t
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
i
s
t
o
b
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
,
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
t
b
e
f
o
r
q
u
a
l
i
f
i
e
d
wo
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
o
n
l
y
?
Sh
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
r
e
b
e
s
o
m
e
k
i
n
d
o
f
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
r
e
t
i
r
e
e
s
o
r
ot
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
a
g
i
n
g
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
?
H
o
w
s
o
?
Wh
a
t
a
b
o
u
t
y
o
u
t
h
w
h
o
g
r
e
w
u
p
i
n
A
s
p
e
n
a
n
d
r
e
t
u
r
n
h
o
m
e
fr
o
m
c
o
l
l
e
g
e
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
w
o
r
k
?
Sh
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
s
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
l
l
o
w
d
o
g
s
?
A
t
1
0
0
%
o
f
t
h
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
?
Wo
u
l
d
y
o
u
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
d
o
g
s
b
e
i
n
g
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
a
t
5
0
%
o
f
a
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
?
Us
e
r
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 12 of 14P32I.
Sh
o
u
l
d
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
b
e
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
h
e
l
p
p
a
y
f
o
r
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
?
Wh
a
t
t
o
o
l
s
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
d
o
y
o
u
h
a
v
e
t
o
h
e
l
p
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
em
p
l
o
y
e
r
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
?
Em
p
l
o
y
e
r
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 13 of 14P33I.
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
2
–
Sa
m
e
t
o
p
i
c
s
a
s
t
o
d
a
y
We
d
n
e
s
d
a
y
,
J
u
l
y
8
,
4
:
0
0
-6:
3
0
P
M
Li
m
e
l
i
g
h
t
H
o
t
e
l
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
3
–
De
n
s
i
t
y
F
o
c
u
s
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
,
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
Se
s
s
i
o
n
4
–
De
n
s
i
t
y
F
o
c
u
s
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
,
A
u
g
u
s
t
27
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
Re
p
o
r
t
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
n
d
s
e
e
k
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
TB
D
,
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
C
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
J
u
n
e
1
1
a
n
d
J
u
l
y
8
,
2
0
1
5
Page 14 of 14P34I.
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
,
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
Op
e
n
H
o
u
s
e
4
:
0
0
-
6
:
3
0
P
M
Li
m
e
l
i
g
h
t
H
o
t
e
l
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 1 of 21P35I.
FU
T
U
R
E
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
!
95
%
OCCUPIED
10
0
%
OC
C
U
P
I
E
D
SI
N
C
E
20
0
7
CONSTRUCTION NOT YET STARTED
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 2 of 21P36I.
20
1
5
St
a
r
t
201?End
1.
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
s
Ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
2.
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
3.
St
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
Ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
4.
De
s
i
g
n
Pr
o
c
e
s
s
/De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
5.
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
De
c
i
s
i
o
n
/De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Proposals
6.
La
n
d
Us
e
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
Pr
o
c
e
s
s
7.
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
Pe
r
m
i
t
Process
8.
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
/Oversight
9.
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
RO
A
D
TO
TH
E
NE
X
T
CI
T
Y
OF
AS
P
E
N
AF
F
O
R
D
A
B
L
E
HO
U
S
I
N
G
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
We
’
r
e
he
r
e
.
Wh
e
n
is
it
go
i
n
g
to
be
bu
i
l
t
?
We
do
n
’
t
kn
o
w
wh
a
t
“i
t
”
is
un
t
i
l
we
ge
t
he
r
e
.
St
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
s
may include:
9
Ci
t
y
Council
9
Co
u
n
t
y
Commissioners
9
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Board
9
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Frontiers
9
P&
Z
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 3 of 21P37I.
20
1
2
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
&Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Sy
s
t
e
m
s
(E
P
S
)
Study
Ti
m
e
l
i
n
e
of
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
=20
1
2
th
r
o
u
g
h
20
2
2
Go
a
l
of
ho
u
s
i
n
g
60
%
of
wo
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
is
no
t
in
th
e
20
1
0
AA
C
P
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
ab
o
u
t
47
%
of
wo
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
ho
u
s
e
d
lo
c
a
l
l
y
an
d
ab
o
u
t
53%commute
Fr
o
m
20
0
1
to
20
0
9
,
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
in
As
p
e
n
gr
e
w
+0
.
4
%
.
In
c
l
u
d
e
d
two recessions.
Ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
:
Wh
a
t
wo
u
l
d
it
ta
k
e
to
av
o
i
d
an
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
in
co
m
m
u
t
i
n
g
by
2022?
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
jo
b
gr
o
w
t
h
of
0.
5
%
wo
u
l
d
cr
e
a
t
e
ab
o
u
t
52
6
ne
w
em
p
l
o
y
e
e
households
(4
7
%
=24
7
ho
u
s
e
d
lo
c
a
l
l
y
)
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
of
16
0
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
fr
e
e
ma
r
k
e
t
un
i
t
s
lo
s
t
to
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
(1
6
0
ne
e
d
to
be
re
p
l
a
c
e
d
100%)
EP
S
es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
36
7
un
i
t
s
wi
l
l
ho
u
s
e
ne
w
re
t
i
r
e
e
s
.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
lowered this
es
t
i
m
a
t
e
to
25
0
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
us
e
of
an
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s t ud
y
.
(2
5
0
ne
e
d
to
be
re
p
l
a
c
e
d
100%)
Co
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
:
To
t
a
l
of
65
7
n
e
w
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
ar
e
ne
e
d
e
d
fr
o
m
2012 to 2022.
Th
e
Ci
t
y
of
As
p
e
n
ha
s
th
e
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
to
pr
o
d
u
c
e
ab
o
u
t
38
0
un
i
t
s
toward this goal.
Si
n
c
e
th
e
ti
m
e
of
th
e
st
u
d
y
,
ab
o
u
t
10
0
un
i
t
s
ha
v
e
be
e
n
pr
o
d
u
c
e
d
.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 4 of 21P38I.
Mo
s
t
Of
t
e
n
He
a
r
d
Th
e
m
e
s
Am
o
n
g
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
Re
c
e
i
v
e
d
Ju
n
e
11
&Ju
l
y
8,
20
1
5
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 5 of 21P39I.
Wh
y
ne
w
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
?
La
t
e
s
t
st
u
d
y
su
g
g
e
s
t
s
Ci
t
y
ne
e
d
s
to
pr
o
d
u
c
e
ar
o
u
n
d
30
0
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
Nu
m
e
r
o
u
s
ar
t
i
c
l
e
s
an
d
em
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
ta
l
k
i
n
g
ab
o
u
t
a cu
r
r
e
n
t
re
n
t
a
l
sh
o
r
t
a
g
e
Ne
w
re
n
t
a
l
s
fo
r
ge
n
e
r
a
l
wo
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
ha
v
e
no
t
be
e
n
cr
e
a
t
e
d
in
As
p
e
n
fo
r
ma
n
y
ye
a
r
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Re
n
t
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Fu
l
l
Ab
o
u
t
10
0
Fo
r
Ͳ Sa
l
e
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
Co
n
d
o
s
Re
c
e
n
t
l
y
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Th
e
r
e
ar
e
ab
o
u
t
25
0
mo
r
e fo
r Ͳ sa
l
e
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
un
i
t
s
th
a
n
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
re
n
t
a
l
un
i
t
s
In
yo
u
r
op
i
n
i
o
n
,
wh
a
t
sh
o
u
l
d
be
do
n
e
ne
x
t
?
FO
R
Ͳ RE
N
T
Lo
n
g
Ͳ Te
r
m
:
Se
a
s
o
n
a
l
:
Bo
t
h
:
FO
R
Ͳ SA
L
E
No
t
h
i
n
g
.
Let local
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
figure this out
on
their own.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 6 of 21P40I.
Ci
t
y
Ͳ Ow
n
e
d
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
fo
r
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Th
e
Ci
t
y
of
As
p
e
n
ow
n
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
fo
r
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
development at:
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
80
2
We
s
t
Ma
i
n
St
r
e
e
t
517 Park Circle
Sh
o
u
l
d
th
e
Ci
t
y
de
v
e
l
o
p
th
e
s
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
fo
r
th
e
pu
r
p
o
s
e
of
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
re
n
t
a
l
housing?
YE
S
:
NO
:
Th
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
ha
s
de
c
i
d
e
d
to
ta
k
e
a HO
L
D
po
s
i
t
i
o
n
on
th
e
Lu
m
b
e
r
Ya
r
d
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
fo
r
th
e
ne
a
r
term.
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 7 of 21P41I.
8
La
n
d
Ar
e
a
:
.2
1
A
c
r
e
/9,
0
0
0
Sq
F
t
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Zo
n
i
n
g
:
R1
5
(M
a
x
FA
R
=
4
,
5
0
0
Sq
F
t
)
Mu
l
t
i
f
a
m
i
l
y
no
t
al
l
o
w
e
d
in
cu
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Zo
n
i
n
g
:
AH
Ͳ PU
D
(M
a
x
FA
R
:
11
0
%
,
9,
9
0
0
)
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
:
“N
o
r
t
h
We
s
t
En
d
”
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
9
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
9
Wa
l
k
/
R
i
d
e
/
B
u
s
Ne
a
r
b
y
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
:
9
7t
h
an
d
Ma
i
n
9
Ba
v
a
r
i
a
n
Co
n
d
o
s
80
2
West Main St.
Wh
i
c
h
is
CL
O
S
E
S
T
to
yo
u
r
pr
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
?
Re
Ͳ de
v
e
l
o
p
th
i
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
as
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
as
so
o
n
as
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
Lo
n
g
Te
r
m
?
Se
a
s
o
n
a
l
?
Bo
t
h
?
De
v
e
l
o
p
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
at
51
7
Pa
r
k
Ci
r
c
l
e
or
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
pr
i
o
r
to
re
Ͳ de
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
i
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
Re
Ͳ de
v
e
l
o
p
th
i
s
as
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
an
d
th
e
n
se
l
l
th
e
un
i
t
s
10
Ͳ 15
ye
a
r
s
la
t
e
r
wh
e
n
th
e
lu
m
b
e
r
ya
r
d
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
re
Ͳ de
v el
o
p
e
d
.
Re
Ͳ de
v
e
l
o
p
th
e
10
0
(s
t
u
d
i
o
)
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
at
Tr
u
s
c
o
t
t
be
f
o
r
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
i
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
North West End Area
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 8 of 21P42I.
80
2
We
s
t
Ma
i
n
St
:
Hi
g
h
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Scenario
80
2
We
s
t
Ma
i
n
St
.
No
r
t
h
We
s
t
En
d
Ar
e
a
Hi
g
h
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
=12
1 Ͳ Be
d
r
o
o
m
Re
n
t
a
l
Un
i
t
s
70
0
Sq
F
t
Ea
c
h
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
:
21
FT
E
Li
v
a
b
l
e
Ar
e
a
:
8,
4
0
0
sq
f
t
FA
R
:
~9
3
%
De
n
s
i
t
y
:
58
Un
i
t
s
/Ac
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
12
sp
a
c
e
s
on
si
t
e
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
He
i
g
h
t
:
So
m
e
3 Ͳ st
o
r
y
+so
m
e
2 Ͳ st
o
r
y
+al
l
e
y
&on
Ͳ si
t
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
la
n
d
)
:
~$
7
.
7
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Co
s
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
0 of
21
FT
E
el
s
e
wh
e
r
e:
~$
0
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 9 of 21P43I.
80
2
We
s
t
Ma
i
n
St
:
Mi
d
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
80
2
We
s
t
Ma
i
n
St
.
No
r
t
h
We
s
t
En
d
Ar
e
a
Mi
d
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
=10
1 Ͳ Be
d
r
o
o
m
Re
n
t
a
l
Un
i
t
s
70
0
Sq
F
t
Ea
c
h
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
:
17
.
5
FT
E
Li
v
a
b
l
e
Ar
e
a
:
7,
0
0
0
sq
f
t
FA
R
:
~7
8
%
De
n
s
i
t
y
:
49
Un
i
t
s
/Ac
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
10
sp
a
c
e
s
on
si
t
e
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
He
i
g
h
t
:
2 Ͳ st
o
r
y
+al
l
e
y
&on
Ͳ si
t
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
la
n
d
)
:
~$
7
.
1
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Co
s
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
3.
5
of
21
FT
E
el
s
e
w
h
e
r
e
:
~$
1
.
4
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 10 of 21P44I.
80
2
We
s
t
Ma
i
n
St
:
Lo
w
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Scenario
80
2
We
s
t
Ma
i
n
St
.
No
r
t
h
We
s
t
En
d
Ar
e
a
Lo
w
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
=8
1 Ͳ Be
d
r
o
o
m
Re
n
t
a
l
Un
i
t
s
70
0
Sq
F
t
Ea
c
h
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
:
14
FT
E
Li
v
a
b
l
e
Ar
e
a
:
5,
6
0
0
sq
f
t
FA
R
:
~6
3
%
De
n
s
i
t
y
:
39
Un
i
t
s
/Ac
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
8 sp
a
c
e
s
on
si
t
e
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
He
i
g
h
t
:
So
m
e
2 st
o
r
y
+so
m
e
1 st
o
r
y
+al
l
e
y
pa
r
k
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
la
n
d
)
:
~$
6
.
5
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Co
s
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
7 of
21
FT
E
el
s
e
wh
e
r
e
:
~$
3
.
2
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 11 of 21P45I.
12
51
7
Pa
r
k
Ci
r
c
l
e
No
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
As
p
e
n
Ar
e
a
Wh
i
c
h
is
CL
O
S
E
S
T
to
yo
u
r
preference?
De
v
e
l
o
p
th
i
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
as
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
as
so
o
n
as possible.
Lo
n
g
Te
r
m
?
Se
a
s
o
n
a
l
?
Both?
De
v
e
l
o
p
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
at
80
2
Ma
i
n
or
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Creek prior to
de
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
i
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
th
i
s
as
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
an
d
th
e
n
se
l
l
th
e
units 10 Ͳ 15 years
la
t
e
r
wh
e
n
th
e
lu
m
b
e
r
ya
r
d
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
re
Ͳ de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
.
Re
Ͳ de
ve
l
o
p
th
e
10
0
(s
t
u
d
i
o
)
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
at
Tr
u
s
c
o
t
t
before developing
th
i
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
La
n
d
Ar
e
a
:
.3
3
A
c
r
e
/14
,
4
5
8
Sq
F
t
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Zo
n
i
n
g
:
R1
5
(M
a
x
FA
R
:
4,882 Sq
F
t
)
Mu
l
t
i
f
a
m
i
l
y
no
t
al
l
o
w
e
d
in
cu
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Zo
n
i
n
g
:
AH
Ͳ PU
D
(M
a
x
FAR=110%,15,903)
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
:
“N
o
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
of
Aspen”
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
9
Wa
l
k
/
R
i
d
e
/
B
u
s
Ne
a
r
b
y
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
:
9
Mi
d
l
a
n
d
Pa
r
k
9
Ce
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 12 of 21P46I.
13
51
7
Pa
r
k
Ci
r
c
l
e
:
Hi
g
h
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
51
7
Pa
r
k
Ci
r
c
l
e
No
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
As
p
e
n
Ar
e
a
Hi
g
h
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
=16
1 Ͳ Be
d
r
o
o
m
Re
n
t
a
l
Un
i
t
s
70
0
Sq
F
t
Ea
c
h
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
:
28
FT
E
Li
v
a
b
l
e
Ar
e
a
:
11
,
2
0
0
sq
f
t
FA
R
:
~7
7
%
De
n
s
i
t
y
:
48
Un
i
t
s
/Ac
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
16
sp
a
c
e
s
on
si
t
e
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
He
i
g
h
t
:
So
m
e
3 Ͳ st
o
r
y
+so
m
e
2 Ͳ st
o
r
y
+be
l
o
w
gr
a
d
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
la
n
d
)
:
~$
9
.
7
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Co
s
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
0 of
28
FT
E
el
s
e
wh
e
r
e:
~$
0
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 13 of 21P47I.
14
51
7
Pa
r
k
Ci
r
c
l
e
:
Mi
d
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
51
7
Pa
r
k
Ci
r
c
l
e
No
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
As
p
e
n
Ar
e
a
Mi
d
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
=13
1 Ͳ Be
d
r
o
o
m
Re
n
t
a
l
Un
i
t
s
70
0
Sq
F
t
Ea
c
h
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
:
22
.
7
5
FT
E
Li
v
a
b
l
e
Ar
e
a
:
9,
1
0
0
sq
f
t
FA
R
:
~6
3
%
De
n
s
i
t
y
:
39
Un
i
t
s
(6
8
FT
E
)
/Ac
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
13
sp
a
c
e
s
on
si
t
e
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
He
i
g
h
t
:
2 Ͳ st
o
r
y
+be
l
o
w
gr
a
d
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
la
n
d
)
:
~$
8
.
7
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Co
s
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
5.
2
5
of
28
FT
E
el
s
e
w
h
e
r
e
:
~$
2
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 14 of 21P48I.
15
51
7
Pa
r
k
Ci
r
c
l
e
:
Lo
w
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
51
7
Pa
r
k
Ci
r
c
l
e
No
r
t
h
e
a
s
t
As
p
e
n
Ar
e
a
Lo
w
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
=10
1 Ͳ Be
d
r
o
o
m
Re
n
t
a
l
Un
i
t
s
70
0
Sq
F
t
Ea
c
h
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
:
17
.
5
FT
E
Li
v
a
b
l
e
Ar
e
a
:
7,
0
0
0
sq
f
t
FA
R
:
~4
9
%
De
n
s
i
t
y
:
30
Un
i
t
s
(5
2
FT
E
)
/Ac
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
10
sp
a
c
e
s
on
si
t
e
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
He
i
g
h
t
:
So
m
e
2 st
o
r
y
+so
m
e
1 st
o
r
y
+on
Ͳ gr
a
d
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
la
n
d
)
:
~$
7
.
6
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Co
s
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
10
.
5
of
28
FT
E
el
s
e
w
h
e
r
e:
~$
4
.
5
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 15 of 21P49I.
16
La
n
d
Ar
e
a
:
.8
2
A
c
r
e
/35,895 Sq
F
t
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Zo
n
i
n
g
:
R1
5
A
(M
a
x
FAR=6,173 Sq
F
t
)
Mu
l
t
i
f
a
m
i
l
y
no
t
al
l
o
w
e
d
in
cu
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Zo
n
i
n
g
:
AH
Ͳ PU
D
(M
a
x
FAR=80%,28,716)
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
:
“L
o
w
e
r
Ca
s
t
l
e
Creek”
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
9
AV
H
/
H
H
S
9
Wa
l
k
/
R
i
d
e
/
B
u
s
Ne
a
r
b
y
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
:
9
Ca
s
t
l
e
Ri
d
g
e
9
Ma
r
o
l
t
Se
a
s
o
n
a
l
Wh
i
c
h
is
CL
O
S
E
S
T
to
yo
u
r
pr
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
?
De
v
e
l
o
p
th
i
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
as
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
as
so
o
n
as
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
Lo
n
g
Te
r
m
?
Se
a
s
o
n
a
l
?
Bo
t
h
?
De
v
e
l
o
p
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
at
51
7
Pa
r
k
Ci
r
c
l
e
or
80
2
Ma
i
n
pr
i
o
r
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
i
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
th
i
s
as
re
n
t
a
l
ho
u
s
i
n
g
an
d
th
e
n
se
l
l
th
e
un
i
t
s
10
Ͳ 15
ye
a
r
s
la
t
e
r
wh
e
n
th
e
lu
m
b
e
r
ya
r
d
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
is
re
Ͳ de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
.
Re
Ͳ de
ve
l
o
p
th
e
10
0
(s
t
u
d
i
o
)
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
at
Tr
u
s
c
o
t
t
be
f
o
r
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
th
i
s
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 16 of 21P50I.
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
:
Hi
g
h
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
Hi
g
h
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
=32
1 Ͳ Be
d
r
o
o
m
Re
n
t
a
l
Un
i
t
s
70
0
Sq
F
t
Ea
c
h
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
:
57
.
7
5
FT
E
Li
v
a
b
l
e
Ar
e
a
:
23
,
1
0
0
sq
f
t
FA
R
:
~6
5
%
De
n
s
i
t
y
:
40
Un
i
t
s
/Ac
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
33
sp
a
c
e
s
on
si
t
e
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
He
i
g
h
t
:
3 Ͳ St
o
r
y
+st
i
l
t
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
an
d
at
Ͳ
gr
a
d
e
/
o
p
e
n
pa
r
k
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
la
n
d
)
:
~$
1
7
.
4
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Co
s
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
0 of
57
.
7
5
FT
E
el
s
e
w
h
e
r
e:
~$
0
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 17 of 21P51I.
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
:
Mi
d
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
Mi
d
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
=24
1 Ͳ Be
d
r
o
o
m
Re
n
t
a
l
Un
i
t
s
70
0
Sq
F
t
Ea
c
h
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
:
42
FT
E
Li
v
a
b
l
e
Ar
e
a
:
16
,
8
0
0
sq
f
t
FA
R
:
~4
7
%
De
n
s
i
t
y
:
29
Un
i
t
s
/Ac
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
24
sp
a
c
e
s
on
si
t
e
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
He
i
g
h
t
:
2 St
o
r
y
+so
m
e
st
i
l
t
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
an
d
at
Ͳ gr
a
d
e
/
o
p
e
n
pa
r
k
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
la
n
d
)
:
~$
1
4
.
1
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Co
s
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
15
.
7
5
of
57
.
7
5
FT
E
el
s
e
w
h
e
r
e:
~$
5
.
3
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 18 of 21P52I.
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
:
Lo
w
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
48
8
Ca
s
t
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
Lo
w
e
r
Ut
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
Qu
a
n
t
i
t
y
=16
1 Ͳ Be
d
r
o
o
m
Re
n
t
a
l
Un
i
t
s
70
0
Sq
F
t
Ea
c
h
Oc
c
u
p
a
n
c
y
:
28
FT
E
Li
v
a
b
l
e
Ar
e
a
:
11
,
2
0
0
sq
f
t
FA
R
:
~3
1
%
De
n
s
i
t
y
:
19
Un
i
t
s
/Ac
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
16
sp
a
c
e
s
on
si
t
e
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
He
i
g
h
t
:
So
m
e
2 st
o
r
y
+so
m
e
1 st
o
r
y
+at
Ͳ gr
a
d
e
/
o
p
e
n
pa
r
k
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
la
n
d
)
:
~$
1
1
.
2
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Co
s
t
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
ho
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
29
.
7
5
of
57
.
7
5
FT
E
el
s
e
w
h
e
r
e:
~$
1
1
.
9
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 19 of 21P53I.
De
n
s
i
t
y
of
Ot
h
e
r
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Facilities
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 20 of 21P54I.
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
Se
s
s
i
o
n
3 –D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Fo
c
u
s
Se
s
s
i
o
n
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
,
Au
g
u
s
t
6
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
Se
s
s
i
o
n
4 –D
e
n
s
i
t
y
Fo
c
u
s
Se
s
s
i
o
n
Th
u
r
s
d
a
y
,
Au
g
u
s
t
27
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
Up
d
a
t
e
–
R
e
p
o
r
t
to
Co
u
n
c
i
l
an
d
se
e
k
di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
Tu
e
s
d
a
y
,
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
1
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ou
t
c
o
m
e
s
–
Ci
t
y
to
se
e
k
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Ci
t
y
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
,
st
a
r
t
by
en
g
a
g
i
n
g
de
s
i
g
n
e
r
s
Se
e
k
mo
r
e
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
/
o
r
mo
r
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
outreach
Do
no
t
h
i
n
g
,
or
re
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
la
n
d
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
or
other
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
D
:
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
A
u
g
u
s
t
6
a
n
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
7
,
2
0
1
5
Page 21 of 21P55I.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM : Don Taylor, City Finance Director
THROUGH: Steve Barwick, City Manager
DATE OF MEMO: August 21, 2015
RE: Direction for City Arts and Community Non Profit Grants
SUMMARY: The Grant Committee is preparing for its consideration of the grant allocations for 2016.
Grant requests have been received and committee members are currently going through them. The
Committee would like to inquire of City Council if there is any guidance or special considerations that
you would like to give the committee in its consideration of grant recommendations.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Each year City Council gives budget direction regarding the
anticipated level of arts and non-profit grants funding increase and then reviews and takes action on the
grants review committee recommendations for grant amounts to each organization. The following are the
current criteria used by the committee based on previous Council guidance.
The overall goal of the City’s grant program is to enhance the spirit, character, vitality and
well-being of the Aspen community.
In reviewing an organization’s grant request, the committee considers the following
parameters:
• How does the group directly benefit our community? Does it make Aspen a better place
to live and visit? Do its activities reflect the values of the Aspen community?
• Does the group add to the creative vitality of the community?
• Does the group educate our youth – or provide our youth with needed recreational
opportunities?
• Does the group engender wide community participation? Because its activities are
valuable, interesting, stimulating and/or fun, does the group engage a large portion of
our citizens in its audience and its volunteer staff?
• Does the organization have Aspen roots? (…as opposed to a national organization with
no deep Aspen connection.)
• Does the organization offer a vital community service in an efficient manner which the
government might otherwise have to provide?
• Is the funding critical to the success of the Non-profit or do they already have
substantial donors to support their efforts.
• Does the organization contribute to the economic success of the city in a material way?
P56
II.
BACKGROUND: In 1979, City voters approved a .5% Wheeler Opera House Real Estate
Transfer Tax (RETT) that went into effect in 1980. The ballot language stated that RETT funds
could be used “only for the purpose of renovation, reconstruction, and maintenance of the
Wheeler Opera House or for the payment of principal and interest on bonds issued for such
purposes and for the purpose of supporting the visual and performing arts. However, the City
Council cannot appropriate in excess of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) in any single
calendar year for the purpose of supporting the visual and performing arts without obtaining the
approval of sixty percent (60%) of the electors …”
At the direction of City Council, the Wheeler Opera House has been responsible for funding
100% of the arts portion of the annual not-for-profit grants requests since 1999. The Wheeler has
contributed the $100,000 from the RETT, with the balance coming from non-RETT Wheeler
operating revenues. The total proposed for the 2016 budget is $350,000 for arts grants.
The proposed funding for community non-profit grants is $404,830 and is accounted for in the
City’s General Fund. This is a 2% increase over the 2015 level.
DISCUSSION: The Grant Committee thinks that the evaluation criteria are still relevant,
however it likes to review the criteria with City Council from time to time to allow for different
emphases if so desired. In recent years there have been some discussions about the level of
funding that should be granted to large non-profits that already have a substantial donor base
and/or endowment. Should the grant awards reward success? All non-profits will argue that it is
important for them to receive some level of City funding as it communicates community support
and helps them in their broader fund raising efforts.
Relatively minor changes in direction or emphasis can be readily adopted for this year’s grants
review cycle. However, if Council would like to make some major changes to the evaluation
criteria, the timing should be considered. Since the 2016 grant applications were prepared and
submitted earlier this summer under the current guidelines and criteria, Council may wish to
defer any significant changes to the program so that they take effect during the 2017 grant cycle.
That way there will be time for discussion and clear communication with the arts and non-profit
organizations and they can keep any changes in mind as they prepare their grant applications.
P57
II.