The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.428 E Hyman Ave.026-0102737 - 073 -39 -0(1 Hit 026- oi j 429 E. 14 yi,+01(Ap, Concepl-Lic*l k/POJ i q ZE c, 1Â·1~Â· 'vf (&24 Aui --=-==. es,i,)*,-Â£4JG.~ (be l-t A 0 2 6- Â¢ I 86, d 2- 5/7 -EIR ~ i L I e pa-; "t 1- c /Q P /1 1 7 I IL .. CASE NUMBER HPC026-01 PARCEL ID # 2737-073-39011 CASE NAME 428 E. Hyman Ave Conceptual HPC PROJECT ADDRESS 428 E. Hyman Ave. PLANNER Amy Guthrie CASE TYPE Conceptual HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Loma Alta Corporation REPRESENTATIVE Michael Fuller Architects DATE OF FINAL ACTION 7/11/01 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso. 31-2001 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 6/18/02 BY J. Lindt 4 r. 1 .. 9 Â¥ D PARCEL ID: |2737-073-39011 DATE RCVD: 2/13/01 # COPIES:' -- CASE NO HPC026-01 CASE NAME: 428 E- HNYmfve ConwptuÂ®tlfE PLNR: 1 4,4 AA,Â£&94 PROJ ADDR:~428 E. Hyman Ave. CASE TYP:~Conceptual HPC , STEPSi il - I i OWN/APP: Loma Alta Corporati ADRI PO Box 600105 C/S/Z: ~ Dallas/TX/75360 PHN:I(214)368-5264 REP:~'Michael Fuller Architects " ADR:~23286 Two Rivers #24 ' C/S/Z:~BasaIUCO/81621 PHN1(970)927-6620 FEES DUE:~1205 D 180E 180H ~ FEES RCVD:|1565 STAT: F REFERRALS| REF:~ BY~ DUE:~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED , â‚¬' 1 - Ill....... 1 DATE OF FINAL ACTION: 37 bllot-- CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ pz: HAL- AZED. 34/.2-CD i . BOA: CLOSED:1413/~BY:'Cy- Li~Ad ~ DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ ~ PLAT (BK,PG).1 ADMIN Ieâ‚¬ Cl .. 0 . 1Â®. michael fuller architects Historic Preservation Commission City of Aspen Community Development Re: Kobey Building Renovation Street Address: 428 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen Legal Description: Lot Q, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado Parcel Number: 2737-073-39-011 April 16,2001 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Loma Alta Corporation, owners of the Kobey Building at 428 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, do hereby apply to the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission for a variance to , the height restriction as described in the Aspen Municipal Code. The project is currently in process to receive an FAR Bonus for 500 square feet to be applied to the proposed penthouse addition, in response to the significant refurbishing of the historic storefront, and a parking exemption of an additional 250 square feet. In response to the Commission's requirement that the original roof structure be kept in it' s original location, the Owners have revised their proposed design, lowering all roofs except that which is required for the elevator that serves the penthouse level. The roof over the elevator has been engineered to be minimum thickness, and set at the minimum height above the finished floor of the penthouse for the elevator to function properly and to meet code safety requirements. The penthouse level is set by the level of the existing roof structure, allowing for adequate drainage away from the proposed floor structure of the penthouse. The portion of the roof the exceeds the maximum allowable building height is approximately 45 square feet (1.5% of the building footprint), and would extend 2 feet above the maximum allowable building height. The grant of this variance will generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan and the Municipal Code by furthering the preservation of historic resources in Aspen and allowing for the building to reach it's potential within the architectural inventory of Aspen. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building, or structure. The proposed design asks for a variance to the height restriction only for the elevator shaft and roof; other roof elements have been lowered to i meet the height restriction. The Owners, due to their age. regard the elevator as a practical and necessary functional element to the project. . michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.927.5366 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 21, P.O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 123 South Spruce Street, P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.0104 [0 970.728.5739 Ebkil.lv E .. , Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of the Municipal Code would deprive the Applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the Applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. The 40 foot height limit is intended to allow for three stories above grade, and the incorporation of an elevator in the project design within the Commercial Core would be considered typical and allowable. Indeed, the required structure for an elevator could be held below the height limit if the Applicant were able to set the penthouse level to accommodate those requirements. By requiring that the original roof remain in place, and the penthouse floor structure to be built above the existing roof structure, the Historic Preservation Commission has placed a hardship on the Applicant that can only be alleviated by a variance. 2 f 1- 44 i 1 1 :.*a . Z 54 1 -* 0 7441 i*K 1 (944 1 Af MA 95 1 2 1 /==w9 1 3Â»: 1 I =1.---dPLLÂ· , 2 ~ EXISTU46 â€¢4yle>>** 1 1 i Ya 111 BATHRCQM TO REMA[4 142 . 1 _- - : lll 1 1 111 1 111 , i '1' i Â· 11 1 1 1 6 1 . 111 1 Ill 1 1. 1 111 11 .V. 01 aNT*-W-U- 11 I 1 -=1 ' ~ 1-2-1 J ' 1 0-------I- --..- i-i ---Â¥*------ 'l a p 1 1.1 - 1 REÂ·tkIL I ~EGH 1 ~ - 1 1 SPACE ' ~;~001R~:1 - 1 11 1 1 1 - 4 ~1 2 Mp 111 1 k,!t,r- - 7 111 1 2.7.:Whi~ANA 1 11 \ / 1 111 1 \/ 1 1 i i' ..1 1 | 111 2 l U.1 /1. 7 1 614 1 EXISTING ' 11 STAIRS ' EXPOSgp BRICK/ ~ r, ~- MASO~liTY FiALLS ~-1 11 1 1 18= 11 1. michael fuller architects 111 1 KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ~ NORTH 42 1 LOWER LEVEL ~ ~ ~ Scale 1/8" = 1, O,0 -1 -3 REGLAZE EXIST'e (ib 42) REMOVE EXISTING RALL FOR >*2*442 04'INDOFFS ALLEÂ¥ PARKING ACCESS. REPAIR BRICK EXIST'e ABOVE OPENING MAT'LS TO PROVIDE 1 1 grocco FINISH ~_, 4 .. } lit h / . 1 OVERHEAD ~ 6Alv'GE 1 EXP ED i Â·Â·~ 1 1 1 1 DOOR ..MASdNRY n u ~ ~14LLS ifyi I- . /- i // 11 f PROPOSED 1 -- PARKING ~- - -2 -7 f = % 5 8-4-EF.- -1 - - Â«Â· CONCRETE ~ 0 (SEALED) 1 1 0 i 1 L 44. 1 A Al k 1 El 1 ELEV. - i 342 1- 1 - 1 1 f 1 =tÂ© 1 I 1 I mxpdsED IiI '' MASONRÂ¥ n A~LLS - 1 1 1 1 -T -1 EXPOSED ~ MASONRY ' ~1- }NALL 1 1 , f-3-j_ 4 9 h - 1- .-I -3 71 EXISTING RET All- mv f....i. \ -i- - i- A.'-Z I SPACE Li LINE OF EXISTING ~ r lit/ FLOOR . 1/ -t 7 r - -F _ 15 FLOOR INFILL USINS EXISTINE---~ 1 9 .. FAR BONUS AND ~ ' -~-7- PARKINS V \I .t .,. h /100'-â‚¬ 0 EXEMPTION 'Tk E ' 1/ / 41 - 4 *p /// \- -- - -1 / 94** f 14*t / / *90 212 =*7*4#F#FAÂ¢e.MÂ·.90â‚¬4:~.. :i:.. //fe GRADE bo- g Â»74* ./ 2 1/ 9 < 1 4 /// 1 t-81,1 0*+ Mt 1 + / ttÂ¥. kt/VAP : 0,+Ve~Â»444/04, . 'i Mit'mai-W~%/r, ./ Ac-oete ' ~---~- --i michael fuller architects 2 I 1 41 1 \ KOBEY BUILDING \ 1 \ 4...: 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE A Y up ' 2â‚¬!Al STONE 9 _ PROVIDE NER STOREFRONT OF MORE =/= STEP AND 1 2R @ 1 HISTORICALLY ACCURATE DESIGN -lit ~ LANDING NORTH EXISTING CAST IRON ~- COLUMNS TO -- ( 1 )> 1 2 ) MAIN LEVEL REMAIN HÂ¥MAN Sr,ale AVENUE -1 -1 {11) 92) REPLACE ROOF C-V RECONDITION ABOVE ~ AY_____ BRICK REFURBISH PROVIDE r--- ----7 7 EXISTING NER 1 1 ~INDORS AS WOOD/STL 11 REQUIRED RAIL 1-- , -2 FS,Kmwit J 3, .1, +UltÂ»fl c It . 111 REPLACE v 11 Â©OOR UPENING TO BE WINDo,V AND j/i-Zi. 4%~ 1 11 Â¢11.-1-E~ PROVIDE #ND PANEL CLOSURE ~ ~~ FRAME 900 1 AT EXTERIOR < L~ 1 BEDROOM 1 M 11 3*RbOM 2 i EXPOSED f A- MASONRY | 1 | i INALL 5 1 j 111 ~11=ERÂ¥ n..f 11 111 MALL *2=Â» A.it-1 1-=ge Iii 6 #ar:.9*.X'*.7â€ž9*7':'*...fl. 1 1 .Â· :. i, - - . f 1~ SitTING 0.5-== -4/1 -: .TE 46 RET f O j <4>- ------- -~-i-U#--Â£1226___--___ -- ~4h ~ 411= 1=1 ----. I- 1><r t' 11 / 1 / R E Il T . ; .' 1 ,1 -1 1.iL 8141- i U i- 11 F -11 \06 1 N 0 IT e ' '1~- E~-EÂ·-1~mL=J -- ==--r~~ I ~ Ii!'L./ i -1~-I- ,-' '14..4 11 Il - - 111 1 ENTRANCE FROM | @69:Â·94.-**.*W*a -4-0~Â».# ADJACENT > i n ~2~~t.U4.!.6~.,~ 7 fOÂ·Â·;:Â·: BUILDING * -1 1 111\ / / 1,1[- --- , 6 1= JO I I/ \ 11 'P -'--. -W--1---9;. - I / 1- ' 1 1 fl \ Iii 111 l ff I f- - W] Iii 1 1 1 'tehi lu lk'#HT ------d-*goa-_u__-4-DEN-la#*U.____ .l 3 2 1 M*MI-FOR 'll:-2-}=I.=-d 11 IiI I / A i. Ti \ 11 '1 ip m. \/ I ENTR~y 6-+-t' 7 1 4 . NA i,Il 'kIT-OjEN 1 1 1%1 41 1 - i: , tilt LIUL-1 1 1.15-Fur 1 7-==C-.___ 1 - Ft -1~Ly---+----_I .<~ ~"- y-~3Â·'Â«,7.04'>*~ './441%0Â·4.+11+Â·-41(**i ABOVE i - -- 7- 11 1~1 1 JEXPOSED il WMASdNRY -6 3 1 1 11 11 1~ALL 11 11 14 --- . ..11:,t GAS LOS U i ./ i || dI '---u . 1 Â·. - MASONRÂ¥ 2 ~<12]TING 1 --13 ST. kIRS ~ - -1 ~-SKY-- ~' FIREPLACE i '' IRINIÂ·N($0~~~5ELÂ¢!f'I!?(El I 'r.-- - WHI- - - -+F- -9/.J --ir-Â·~-~ 1 ~~ 18. qi 1 1 1 .1 11 Ill I T I + 1 1 rl- 1 1 Ii' 1 D michael fuller architects 1 11 - -114@44:824,-1 -Â»uÂ«*Â· I 9Â¥43*Â¥Â·~0>k~,41Â·~4Wl"A<,4.4/#I#.#*.9.1 "02?,ty)*1 Â¤11 ..... la, 1Â¤ L KOBEY BUILDING 0 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE REFURBISH EXISTING RENOVATE BRICKAORK, MINPOF'IS AS REQUIRED | NORTH WOOD DETAILS, AND COLOR -- AS APPROPRIATE / A UPPER LEVEL L ' j-> ~2 I iwi .r ; I j -3 DN HALL -1 42 j REPLACE 1 EXISTING 1 FARAFET AND #F--------- El'EBROF'I ROOF . MITH EXISTING PESIeN . 0 Z i--I 2\~ / 11 ..' ....re, 121 M 11 BATH 1 EA A-- 1 _ ~i-- ~ BEDRM 3~ i.< i.* d*yÂ· 11 4, 9 4 r- 14F ~ Mft--0- -r'amvi I -1. 126-r//- 1 -1=-1 6 * RET BA~ 1 MECH. CHASE - 3 19,f-- - * I - -Z =- 1 i GAS =SZZ Fle. SITTING it- thrt Rr 1 El. 1 0 :- -. 4 1 1 1 1 -- - 1 1 . hEANsuddENT \ . r- 91Â«UdHT, 79 2 ir-upro , 'WA *2**-.&= Ime-*,41?*Np;Â»Â«~ A \ , / 411>v DN 4 1 1 3 P- lx__11_-= - 43>, V I /1 I , 1 1 1 1 1 %-I - -\ k . 1 ~~3>- TRANSLUCENT ' SKYLIGHT (SLOPED) I / 1- / , Z METAL I E-9rt*7 9 --,1 --*---- RREPLACE 18. 1 1 I FLUE michael fuller architects 4 - 3-7- ./ 1 KOBEY BUILDING 1 . EXIBTING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 9 STAIRS < k#.9*424. e #2â€ž%04**42Â»Wel .*.*I (1> 4 2 ) PENTHOUSE Scale 1/8 . = 11 - 0.1 L _J ..... 4 ,0....Aiw~%Â·MÂ·~vÂ»Â·iÂ·,4,uÂ·.Â·v~~I..."1,#~ 11 ...... ./* (4 1 2 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 - 11 - b'' I' '''.. <: 1 N.: 64 4 34 i 14 1 FLAT ROOF Â£ (TYPICAL 0 -~ i/1 Â·' h. =u- =-2 4LOCATION5) , 44 -,0.7.*-4|7414 \ ~ 1 1 1-,Imil/45&.\ /1 I 1-- 1- 1 / C-22- It - - 1 4 1 1 41 1 . - t---1. . 1- '( 4 ~ - Â·'taph#Vot?!4!flt?ffk / 1 | L --Â« 6 .. 6% 4- CURv ED METAL I HATCH INDICATES 1 ROOF ~ 1 PORTION OF ROOF fÂ· . , 1 ABOVE MAXIMUM - | | -~ : -rÂ· .- . ALLOWABLE BUILDING 1 i...: 1 ~-..:.ff 1 ' HEIGHT 1 1 11 It I 1 i 8, m 1 1 1 1 < 3)--------~-----------r--*------- 3 1 L./ 1 1 1 , 1 . 1 1 1 18. , michael fuller architects 1 KOBEY BUILD]NG 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 1 4 1 1 . 1 1 NORTH 1 < 2) rh ROOF PLAN ~ NT+. C 1 -U ~ Scale 1/8" = 4, Aw ' -1 1 2 PROPOSED PENTHOUSE SPACE BEYOND NER TRANSLUCENT 1 SKYLIGHT r-=9==R-~T== i REPAINT Â»ID CORNICE 1 i PROVIDE NER CORNICE PIECE TO MATCH o00ooeoooeooocoo oooo DETAIL ON OPPOSITE ~ SIDE ,&~52 Â· 174% 24*' -932,9.-..9,32-Â· ....,02. Â·- -6 91i---t~-i-.f( 2.-Â·--F' REMOVE PAINT PER AD Â· Â· x.. i.-- ~.: .- -.-.- I - -.-.= -r---- ---:*- 2 --: - r - 1 - : .t. GUIDELINES 992 â€¢. REFURBISH EXISTING MINDORS ---- PROVIDE NEFY 0 STOREFRONT SYSTEM REPLACE/RESTORE 'Aloop DETAILING 111 / !!11 ~ 111 111 / ilil \. 111 11 1/' lin All 11 j 1 '41 0 0 cler--LH NER MOOD PANELS /Â·a.:Â·Â·Sli It ::%..:2 ::.elth:.Pat.:?8 , -----â€ž- -'I-:.t:*Â·... -2. ,dÂ·.2;Â·.SÂ·..Â·Â·t Â·Â·.Â·iÂ·< NER STONE STEP AND LANDING SOUTH ELEVATION Scale 1/8" = 18 - 0" HATCH INDICATES PORTION OF ROOF ABOVE MAX. ALLOFNABLE BUILDING HT. 2 ZINC> 1 PANEL SIPING STU O n NER STEEL GUARDRAIL REPLACE L..-.:E:~..'3Ris -- -I--F~~4Â·1~f:.igu-:-~c**.~:-;~~ 24-.~~:- -r--.-C-Â»t'. 49.22;:. ./ 9- ~15.- ..#2 0 CORNICE -fiÂ· ~ -7.- REFURBISH 1-2-3 2.4 KINDOWS, TÂ¥P. ~ 9/ 1 - *e AN -3:: I -I---9., .16 ~VIIA7N.. â€ž-....413Â» pierÂ£*03 77:Â·Â·-Â· - 1-44=WAst- 1 *20'. 490042â‚¬y- .496*9~ 14, 0 R29"f,Â·4:1.fiPARÂ·..i.~-~:-ft. Y**394.-~F-r-l--4-35 -1-~--6--- -"-,w,~1-.fU:. 29.3 9 Ot'....-~1,% 1.-3.:f:2-:17.1 71:-.=4~yJ'~4 ,~. 1- =,7.-= -I ~-3 1-'d~-- fe ~ '~~ ,- ; REFACE EXIT ._L.8 6112-&3 212:L~-1222Â·:Â·-Â·=ra...~.... ..2.Aai.-12.r.Â·7.2--....=r-M:~Â·Â·eÂ·4 4 -~, ~.3 I....Ls-'i F~Sl STAIR 34 1 k {L=1 L i 122 il 1.11 il -j! IL_J #r:- -:-?-6 -P~ 21 A/STUCCO. 1*Â·:Ill ' i 1422 1 34...2 :-1 1.4 REPLACE - 21-Â·&Â·yl It 2. .I. EXISTING 11 MINDORS 18. NORTH ELEVATION michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING ~ Scale 1/8" = :13 - 0" - 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE HATCH INDICATES PORTION OF ROOF / 4 ~ r- ABOVE MAX. CURVED METAL / / ALLORABLE BUILDING V n Â«'1 HEIGHT r ROOF METAL 1- - I i i H u l FIREPLACE FLUE 4 Â» U u 23 / ill gING PANEL SIC>ING --~ 64 . . NEA STEEL GUARDRAIL -~ 2ZkZ3 - BRICK COMMON MALL - HÂ¥MAN AVENUE ALLEY MALL mil EAST ELEVATION ...4 Scale 1/80' = 1' - 0" le. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 4 - 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L .... -1 HATCH INDICATES PORTION OF ROOF ABOVE PIAX. ALLOKABLE BUILDING HE)GHT 1 - Fl i ZINC PANEL ~::::~~ SIPING - 1- 2-M iâ€ž *- . .-W- FGA ~ - -- '.*ekÂ»2â€¢9Â¢ebN*NÂ»aÂ¢20*RE.9.-0.14,?XÂ«lat>'*4*teâ‚¬*Â¥ ak'â€¢--0.*4Â·*NNW R .. i ~ ~~-Â·d_ ROOF or ADJACENT 4 9009 09 1 .... L. 1 BUILDING 3 BUILDING ~~~,/ ADJACENT SUILPING 2 ---1 E DOOR TO ADJACENT --1 -- 1.--i DOOR TO BE FLOOR OF :Â£,'~~~~~ REPLACED Â£-STUCCO --7 f - I - BE 4 1 %/ REPLACES 1. ,-1 1.=== - 10 ~ ADJACENT BUILDING â€¢ 4 4 4 1 FLOOR OF y G f f 4 1 it f 1 - 6 NErt 1 f~PASSAGEMAY * D - 1 -t 1 NM HANDRAIL PER OOPE a FLOOR OF w 2 ADJACENT BUILDING : i % 7,7 1 44 ~Â· . 1 1 1 1 h. 11 1 N 1 , 1 ~ WEST SECTION/ELEVATION Scale 1/41' = 1' - 0" NOTE: REPRESENTAION OF ADJACENT BUILDING 19 DIAGRAMATIC ONLY 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AvENUE 4 .1 4*.r/Â£'#4Â¥MAÂ«Â¢44Â»4~,impÂ»*~:4;4~*440*0~41 ~ </4 Â·24Â»01>*00,â€¢*/2 404 keÂ»Â«-/4 /.*0.*9.*. .....~**Â» r _ 0 ~ T.O. FLY = MAX. ALLOn. 1 1 k=:= -'*-*17 BLDG. HT. -13 8-10" 1/':i~i,~~i!!!i:iii:iijiÂ· INNCh~= 1, 1 1 .i . 'T-~Ti; U-----~ ZINC PANEL ~ MMMA , mnnmiii;!iwilii_!i!!~11~i:iw~iiinp,lui<filiwni,itu~~nip,miT:1-1-HUNRETrr~,Ijiw= , 12 11 p--11 eli/ING STUCCO fl '1 2 3 Ill REBUILD EXPOSED 7 A ; / \77 . 11 Â»>. \Ur f BATH ROOF-SARpeN---~* 46/J-+ 1-- , 1 1 I *TARRAÂ¥ ~ L: 1 % EXISTIN(3 ii Bl~1(31â€¢~: ,~ i " '' ' ~~-~ \047. 1 311. , 1 1 \ ~4241 CORNICE H /Ill r I il I .6 1 T.O. PLY ' V\' \ 1*9229 i,z.,0â€žm,w#JwÂ·:,3%,fR*'&%*,4 0.9,RÂ·l'i-*m_ . 4 1 T~~I , -. L -. 3. 127'-5 3/4" 1 1 , I ur~lt'H- Iftia- ./ 11 1" ap 0 0 BEDROOM BATH P le#N~5/ 1 HALL AAÂ¥ h 1 1 . , 4- T.O.FLY r~T.O. PLÂ¥ -za~ //./11 5-11" - le.. i}ira- , .1.yÂ»'44'27ka'.M:84Â·&.WaÂ·y Â¥ F ./. :4 0 1131-11" **/.9 . I I - STAIRRAY ~-3~ P. 1 *Â»i .- 2 & I :1 2 1 4 R ETAIL SPACE -2 *RETAIL I HÂ¥MAN ALLEY 0% GARAGE dVESTIBULE HALLKAÂ¥ 4 NENTRY AVENUE 4424, ..l 1 :1 .. 91 MALL CÂ»TO.PLY P. li Â· =tlm ,/ 4 - ' 44411Ii=111 C 3 1 1 T.O. PL~'0~ ll:3 81 ,Â«Â·m'll'llWpL---1.- 1-1 11 - 100-OVO /~ALLEÂ¥ ELEV. 9% 1 w w u 2 4+ . . A. I. . 1-. %1 -- 2 -MALL ELE;.7/ ---- q B'- 10" RETAIL SPACE RETAIL SPACE#K: fl' T.O. SLAB 71, ~- f' T.O. SLAB ~ 9 01- q" r--- ' 90'-9/ rih BUILDING SECTION Scale 2/0 - 1-1.1 1 ./. - 4 5 2. I S 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L .... -1 ra FNALL OF ADJACENT BUILDING BEYOND -~ C11 ~ MAX. BLDG HT. 138'- 10" i-' -- -7 -7 7- -i--11 ._Er-z- 1- 17- .-~-t- ~-2-- -#-1-*22 '1 -Zat- Â·. i '- ' "E . - TRANSLUCENT PANEL ~-1 W I 1 P- 1 Â«- A/STUGOO 0 11 I I. NEFY EXIT STAIR SKYLIGHTS 1 ---- - ~ ENCLOSURE ~ ROOF GARDEN ~ITTIN~ f~ BEDROOM B V 4///j ROOF ~DEN 1 P 4 I 1 , i *931 3 T.O.FLYrh 1 -I ~' J - 4~27'-4 1 /4'~7 . 1 1 Sil b==~ I m 4 REBUILD CORNIGE AND PARAPET LIVING KITCHEN ~| BA.trH b BATH SITT 46 BEDROOM 2 rl E MIN - P =r 1 1 .. 0 710. PLY 1 - 9 1 ex M Iii :t..i= T.O. PLÂ¥/h 11 3'- 11" J====6 1 -1 11 51- 111~ E-li HYMAN - AVENUE GARAeE 1 / 'I ALLEÂ¥ RETA L ENTRY RETAIL SPACE e /, MALL ~~ .: 11 .I LA T.O. FLY ~- II V.j 1020'.F hu_ 11 ./ I E . 1 ALLEÂ¥ t <. W Wp W El ELEV. b T.O. SLAB -/p-- Ve'-e" 1 f n RETAIL SPACE 1%= L RETAIL SPACE .= e T.O. SLABA ~ *~ q 01- gil 1 1 1 - Â©10'-4. BUILDING SECTION la. Scale 1/8"= 1' -0" michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 4Â· L .... --1 ADJACENT ELEVATOR / 2 V ~ BUILDING ~ VENTILATION 4 ~-- LOUVRES STUCCO -r--~ 1- ===1 Â«*0-T-Ell , O 002--- ~a-4 - ZINC PANEL SIDING 1111111 -4, 1 CII]Il Ribdil NER :*ARDEN E> 4*-STEEL 11 97--r 11 111 :11 RAIL 421 1 1 ..,- f L EXISTING y* 1 573 1 11 1~ ROOF DECK I i , $ 4 P- AND 6.- i )~ t~ RAFTERS TO *Nut REMAIN DEN 1 ffir 4 - TO. PLY L 11 5-11" 0 i.' 9 * 4- 14 4 9 /t RETAIL SPADE 4 3. Cd I t- 4 43 -/ 100-cr Iffil 4 3 1 .... . RETAIL SPACE 1 , AÂ· lid :I' '81- F.'. 4 T.O.SLAB 0 . 6 - q 01_gil rih BUILDING SECTION 6 e -CURVED METAL ROOF < ADJACENT BUILONG ~ PROPOSED VARIANCE HEIGHT / 140-6' ~ FACE NEFÂ·4 OmmmMMIN MAX ALLOWABLE BLDG HT /h ENCLOSURE - 01/RECYCLED ..1 -- . 138%10 ~Q BRICK ~ L , ~ 1 41 - ii:--- SPRING POINT /h 2 f F 1 - 'h,-'. 1 56Â£0' ~ 1 ~ -CURVED STEELBEAM(4 TOTAU - I PENT ~GbE , PROVIDE NE}41 METAL CAP AND STL FAILING 3 1 -- ----- :--s- Â·.Â· Mie 127'-4 1/4' t. rl :re ~59341 4.1 TO. FLY 0 11 1 - I .: V~ 39* 8 1 bek# *1 I - 1% 31 - - *- 1 EXISTING --- 15 ,-,000 1 4 m li STRUCTURE TO REMAIN 4,- .L 51 --ING -- Or 1 .16 Inal-C 00 r lill Ellif T.0. PLY 94% Â·Â·Â·Â· ......~ ..36*? 1 : ELEV. 11 9% 1 r ~ *44?A; 2%19 : 01* i F . 9'i. F: ii!%3%:*m:i *i-Ii i: $@2,':,Â· 0*f ~ ab -- 46.0?t, *3* - 0* H. +LL VES-IEÂ· JLE _ RETAIL , .- . - - Â· TO PLY /h 0 3. . 1%78 ni: : Â»Bi M k 1 1 0 18. We 0% Stey el , *ft# : RETAIL r. 0 michael fuller architects J 1 TO SLAB 0 L. . U.1- 1 1 - 1 1 etc-q. KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE (7~ BUILDING SECTION Scale 1/47- Â·1'.0" L -1 :Al 1'.4~ 03*3 1 1. i ..1 3% i r0 ittmtri 1 1 1 1 i' 1 111111'11'11 HYMAN '111 iNG lm#mtit71 |- 14---"r +418#11#d n 1 1/ 1.1 ...I----I--I /4 AVENUE R , - MALL ... , 1 . 1\ - PRoposebl ALLEY . , RETAIL ' , PAR~KIÂ» 1 o 100'-O" ' 7-rr.9 584 9.F. 9 3'- 10" F'~ n--I- ---t---------Â·-------SFACE___~_~-~----=4=- _'LaL-el-_ ~, /~ D<& - -el - NORTH SITE PLAN Not to Scale la. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L .... -1 r - ~ MAX. BLDe HT. 1 58'- 10" Et-1.:12.-=-'-:Ir,2--'7,3 ./.44-knE,CUJ tu=.Ir:. 1 '4Â· ~:z::~riÂ·Â·c~tp~Â·Â¤ .2:1:Â·,...--i'Â·/3//1 .4 -! : \ P RESIDENTIAL ALLEÂ¥ HÂ¥MAN AVENUE - 0,0 8 vo & i h oti Â°000Â°~Rl RESIDENTIAL * 1 *= 14 I -A<-110.# 00 1(9 " <3Â» 5 giligilimiligilill .Â·.tÂ· E 02 <E â‚¬:Â·:X<Â·E' *FF ... Ill.--- . 4\0/ t -1 U 4 *0 . Litle FIN. FLR. RETAIL GARAGE MALL ALLEÂ¥ ,- -mM.-.-9=X==~===9"9= -5 ELEV. ' ELEV. ELEV. C 100'-O" Y.5.--li. 4 6'- 10" RETAIL (r 98'-6" . -6 SITE SECTION Not to Scale 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L .... -1 , ... Feb.26, 2002 11:OOAM MIC'~ FULLER ARCHITECT No.1444 P 1 1/2 . 18. michael fuller architects Fax Transmittal Date: 26 February, 2002 TO: Amy Guthrie Fax #: 920-5439 From: Jill Speed Project: Kobey Building Re: Permit 2688.2001 Pages: 2 [including cover] If this fax did not transmit in its entirety, please call 970.927.6620 as soon as possible. Hi Amy, I just wanted to let you know that we had to make another change on the North Elevation of the Kobey Building. Due to Code Requirements we had to make some plan changes which flipped the garage and pedestrian doors back to their original location. I don't think this will cause any issues with the HPC as this is the arrangement that was originally approved. However, I just wanted to verify with you that this is ok and I have attached a copy of this elevation. Also, Can you please send us something in writing regarding the j approvals that were made on our last design addendum's for our records. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Thanks! Â·Â«Â« -1 ~ 6 ~ O/2/ Jill Speed 9*226\ (e Uilâ‚¬J<QV Â©4~Al<14 600/t-1 michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.927.5366 P.O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.0104 [f] 970.728.5739 FUTURE MEGA UNITS rxrry =37 Bl B 1 A , tilâ€¢. Ir â€¢-,1.> . :I' Â·Â¢' STUCCO I./ . I . 1 - 1 - 1 1 IN- N.) 0-=1 ----7 -=11-- --1 5- - 2 -t---- 1 -f- - F--- - STONE PANEL SIC>,16 I fe , 1 ..1 1 0 ./ r - SUARMIL ' Â· , 1 \MARSâ‚¬*5%31 . 2 - PER CODE 1 :/9 2â‚¬iÂ¢ 17Â·4344' 4*Â·stÂ· %32 / 0 ':8 u..90:Â·iÂ·'-6 :45.,Â·..34 1% , 4:'38Â· NN &~. Â· . . vel ' 'Â·'E. Â·â€¢â€¢2 4: 61 1:Â·â€¢2-34.1 1Â£ "20./.2. ..,~' ,<â€¢ C - TO. PLY 126'-6' u '- 7-- - - 7 -*,ENEXAER& --4 1 1 REPLACE CORNICE , 1 1 1 REPLACE nITH NEYI GLASS FLOF 2 ' ;0'' 9 ,>';*=i'L''i,AUR- 2 RerVROISH F P,INE>OrNs. Trp. R 1 N NER *UARPRAIL PERÂ·COPE , , i REPAIR EXISTING *)Â·Aer,Â·Â·,.'; t.? Â·.Â·1Â·â‚¬Â· t>â€¢ .,. â€¢ , BRICK FACADE AS .â€¢ I REQUIRED , 0 1 - 1. 4 1 1 , -1 K'' 0 1- r I t = 2 *16 -11 e , i | " 411 1 1 : . > MEPLACE EXPOSED STEEL .: K . EXIST,16 BEAM AND GOLUMNB 1 ag ~ 2 ' Fâ€¢NDOING P 5 T , 1 . ' OF'EH .'I ' ' 6 11111111111.1 11 .2 9.1 YN/BTUCCO. Sb.IR , A .':. ALLEY L I i.1 J i 8.4 Cih NORTH ELEVATION 3.31*-1/451'.0' 4 .Â·. Feb.28 2002 11:OOAM MICHAEL FULLER ARCHITECT No,1444 P 2/2 . Letter of Transmittal Date: 01-24-02 TO: Amy Guthrie CC: From: Jill Speed Project: KOBEY BUILDING Job #: 20016 Re: revisions We are sending you: E attached F--1 under separate cover via Hand delivery the following: Copies Date No. Description 1 01-14-02 Memo from Peightal Engineers 1 Sketch of roof proposal 1 2x Photos of existing roof conditions 1 North elevation 1 2x steel details at garage 130-1 for approval 171 for your use E-1 as requested P-1 for review + comment Remarks: Please find the above mentioned attached for your review. Jill Speed TJ 0Â» michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.927.5366 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 21, P.O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 123 South Spruce Street, Suite C, P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.0104 [f] 970.728.5739 . I le. michael fuller architects Memorandum Date: 01-21-02 TO: Amy Guthrie Project No. 20016 From: Jill Speed Project: KOBEY BUILDING Re: Revisions for HPC Pages: 1 Approval If this fax did not transmit in its entirety, please call 970.927.6620 as soon as possible. Amy, Following is a list of proposed design addendum's to the Kobey Building for your approval: 1. Please review the memo issued by SK Peightal Engineers, regarding existing roof framing. We are proposing to maintain the existing 2xl 0 roof structu re and to remove the lower non-structural 2x6 rafters. Please refer to the sketch attached and photos for further clarification. 2. As requested by the HPC we are replacing the roof over the rear balcony and setting it at a new height above the brick header details at the rear windows. It is our proposal to replace the roof with a translucent roof so as to allow more natural light into the south end of the 2 nd floor. 3. Finally, we have new steel structural framing around the garage and pedestrian doorways on the south elevation. To install these structural members we will have to remove existing brick. We propose to leave the steel exposed at this location. Please review these revisions and let me know if there are any issues that require further consideration. Thank-you. Jill Speed michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.927.5366 P.O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.0104 [f] 970.728.5739 - Ul/10/ZUUZ UM:06 Pal W/U WZi U 0 21 1 bil reign-Cal tnglneers LE] Uul & 0 S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS t~~ILMEMORANDUM ~- tr ' TO . Michael Fuller Architects ATIN - Jill Speed 927 5366 FROM â€¢ Adrienne Prosser DATE . 14 January 2002 PROJECT â€¢ Kobey Building PROJECT No. Â· 01003 RE Â· Roof framing This office has been asked to review the structural integrity of the existing roof framing system of the Kobey Building. The initial analysis assumed 2*10 members spaced at 16" oc bearing on a double glu-lam beam line (spaced approximately 5'-0" apart) in the center of the building, and at the brick walls of the exterior. However, the existing finish materials have since been removed, revpnling gignificant variances from what was assumed. The roof is constructed of 2xl0s at 16"oc. Where the rafters meet the exterior brick walls, they bear on a cripple wall that is framed on the inside of the brick wall. This cripple wall bears on 2x6 rafters which have been pocketed into the innermost brick wythe at 16" oc. In many locations, these have undergone fire damage. There does not appear to be any sort of positive connection between the rafters and the brick wall at either level. While gravity loads can be transferred in this manner, there is no opportunity to distribute lateral loads, which presents life safety concerns- At the interior bearing points, these rafters rest on cripple walls that in turn bear on the double qlu-lam beam line. At this point, the lower 2x6 rafters appear to present no Structural advantage. It is proposed that the lower, 2x6, rafters be removed. Structurally, this is acceptable and provides the opportunity to bring the numerous deficiencies and life safety issues into line with the current building code. A new connection of the upper rafter to the brick walls can be developed and detailed to satisfy the lateral loads which are currently of concern. 01003 Memo M3R 76 Sunset Drive #4 â€¢ Basall, CO â€¢ 81621 - (970) 927-9510 â€¢ fax: {970) 927-0597 - skpÂ¢@rof.net Received Time Jan 15 8:46AM 0 0 HPC Proposal For Existing Roof Structure 01.17.02 - =000---4 -- 1__ #EL<\4'7*Jer 51% 14 0 1,11â€¢,6, ertgu (4*441*4 A'/ - - - 47 rt M 4 -' LAVEL , . -1 michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.925.3110 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 24, P.O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 300 South Pine Street, P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [4 970 728.0104 ~ 970 728 5739 ~ ~ michael fuller architects '1 44 , * I 94 fi ~24 . 49*ST-146 9>< \0,5 40 IG " 0,0 0111 FFLE Wall, 2 ),6 RAFTE 05 - aLU -LAM BEAM - 0 0 U. '' 4 lai '1 ...al I. ' I - . .1 .... : 4.- . 41 4....ric i : 19 I . -. 4â‚¬*-r -tÂ»,r - t *4. .Ar .=67. +. . 6 ... 4,9 r':719*. 2.. ' . . I. I '44%,2. + .-P . 1 I >1 . -97' 40' i,&~22* 3%:'R'PY':. Â·. 7 f.:'.1/Nul#NK. 0,â€¢r:"94'.21*blatfÂ·. I .4 *44 ' ~: ..'-7*La' m. 1.14* r" f. Â·4.i;i .. 4.~:. ..' ' * '#9.~ *â€¢~(~ I .t'*. SÂ¥71'. 04 4,4 - . ....â€ž. 1,4-:1 41( 10;2. .Y. A .. . 1. - - . I . 4 ,~i~ 3'0.6 :" /*f- f .:4% .. 4+ I . '../ 6/ti.3//LI'll . Â·.r - - J . 0, Al')%,14$ 4 . 4,.* i.: . 1 $ .1 i 4. 4 I Â« - + I . I + ./ I 2 + C 14-4 ' . LA i I > ' I . ta- â€¢ 4 ' . I LEXISTING, p ,/Ds p 16" 0 6 PXISTING 1, 4,5 CIKIFf>LE vvALL - FUTURE MEOH 2 UNITS \ A4.1/ ~04.v STONE PANEL 1 r *Â®f STUGGO 1 A SIOING 1 NEÂ» Irll' GUARDKAL 11 \ 111 PER CODIE O EZED H .4,1 1166ul I i = 1 7'-39/a T.O. PLY :54 1 26'-6" v - -9 NEFV LANDING - REPLACE CORNICE__/'~ -_- 1 REPLACE ATH NEFN GLASS ROOF *- C-?~ _ ~ 11440 ii _= REFURBISH 1 MINDONS. TÂ¥F. PAHELII =- L 41 2 -EE NErt STL/PNOOD GUARPRA]L PER GOIDE - 11 3'-11" - T.O. PLÂ¥ -U- :: ::2: REPAIR EXISTING --- -- - BRICK FACADE AS REQUIRED EXPOSED STEEL 0000 BEAM AND COLUMNS ' | REFACE EXIT STAIR rl/STUCCO. REPLACE - EXETING 1 kicIi AINDORS 93'-6 ALLEY 1 10 L I IVI I 6 /33 NORTH ELEVATION \43.1/ Scale 1/4" = 1'-0" â‚¬**1...2%1 *51 **ER[ I'll//%68Rt t 1 -r . ,I \\21 E x Â«4-~ Â«~oot:.6 -- I / 1 1.\ 1. I. 1\99414 1, 1~ 1-$ f i. i kÂ» 6. 1. : 1 , PETA L {3) S\DE- OF /1/%E:ACE_____ michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.927.5366 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 21, P O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 1Â®. 123 South Spruce Street, Suite C, RO. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.0104 [f] 970.728.5739 michael fuller architects . j L 3- 41- M +11- - - , --r- 1 031---- ~ fi ll - 1 ./ 1 L t- -- -1 4 ./ 1 .... X. \ A 41 . 1\ : -4 -3Â« \\ -1 4/1 I . ,\ i Â·41% 1 . 12,-9 -3.0 X. -F-- 1 - .. - \\\Ne ./ .. I . . I.-.- - 1 \0 1 1 44 1 4 .\~ - 1 I :011\ 35 \\,\Â» ing\> 3 4% lut' p --- 220222~-- 7 ,- .~ .j,4~ L t .31 1 ~ JPET)%1 6 (1) 40<844 2 RedNER michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [fJ 970.927.5366 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 21, RO. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 1Â®. 123 South Spruce Street, Suite C, P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.6104 [f] 970.728.5739 michael fuller architects \ . 6 .. 18. michael fuller architects Letter of Transmittal Date: 11.21.01 TO: Amy Guthrie CC: From: Jill Speed Project: Kobey Building Permit No.2688-2001 Job #: 20016 Re: revisions We are sending you: ~ attached F-7 under separate cover via Hand delivery the following: Copies Date No. Description 1 11.21.01 Original North Elevation 1 11.21.01 Revised North Elevation 171 for approval g-1 for your use ~-1 as requested E--1 for review + comment Remarks: Amy, Attached are copies of the North Elevation of the Kobey Building including both the original and revised version. In order to accommodate the Zoning Departments allowable FAR floor area calculations revisions were made to the building resulting in a slight change to the North Elevation. Note that the garage door and pedestrian door have been flipped around. Please let me know if this will effect the approval of the HPC. t>9~t 0021 Please call if you have any questions. U tul 1 Thanks, Jill Speed michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.927.5366 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 21, P.O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 123 South Spruce Street, Suite C, P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.0104 [fj 970.728.5739 , , FUTURE MECH. 2 UNITS ,1) \ M.1/ . A41/ Â® -r*e@ NI' ~ STONE PANEL 510116 | '' STUCCO 1 1 1 1 1711' NEM GUARDRAL PER DODIE 177=7:n 11 311 biLJ 11////111 121-41/4- Â·~ ~ - T.O. FLY NEY'I LANDING REPLACE CORNIGE __/ - --- REPLACE ROOF Â»2174 1,1 1 1 IFI.MO I REFURBISH ANDOAS TÂ·rn 2-2 -O = 1 1 NEY! STL/Â»1000 --E - Â·- GUARPRAILL PER GODE 5=------ -=---~-~ =111=111_________--M#E T.O. PLÂ¥ - ---- - REPAIR EXISTINe BRICK F*~)BREA: W = -4 ~-f ~ 1- ~17=: REFACE EXIT STAIR U I ~Â·~ REPLACE ri/:TOOCO. b EXISTING *INDOrIS I ~-313 98'-6 ALLEY | 1 L 1 1 1 J al__NORTH ELEVATION- ~3-~- Scale 1/4" = 1' - 0Â·' -'REV \Selb - \\. 2 \. al .. FUTURE MECH. UNITS F ~~A2 STONEPANEL , SIPING ] STUCCO NE)N GUARDRAL PER GODE | 121-41/4 T.O. FLÂ¥ 126'-6 7 NEPN LANDING -- REPLACE GOIKNICE _,/~ i REPLACE ROOF =3Â¥33-; ACI - REFURBISH 1--- 1134"11 - AINIPORS. TYP. - - 1 1 - NEFW STL/ADOD ---- GUARPRAIL PER COIDE__2~ . IZZ~~~~~====ILL 2111=111__~ - -- - ~- ---- -- - T.O.PLY -- REPAIR EXISTING .~---------. --==== - BRICK FACADE AS ----U~ .1 REQUI9ED____~~ ~~~~~~f~ ~ 11 11 1 REFACE EXIT 1 - STAIR - A/STLIOCO 0 --- REPLACE b -| EXISTING ININDORS - 11 - 2 00*n 20 , i - ALLEY I | | L 1 1 1 J /33 NORTH ELEVATION ~3~ Scale 1/4" - 1' -0" - 0-K,4\NAL. - 4 .. le. michael fuller architects SUBMITTAL FOR FINAL READING Historic Preservation Commission City o f Aspen Community Development ' Re: Kobey Building Renovation Street Address: 428 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen Legal Description: Lot Q, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado Parcel Number: 2737-073-39-011 May 23,2001 The Applicant proposes the following renovation and restoration to the Kobey Building: 1. Modify existing structure to meet current structural code as relates to the proposed uses. 2. Provide exiting as required for the proposed uses of the building. 3. Provide two parking spaces off the alley with an overhead garage door. 4. Perform required modifications to qualify for a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Install an elevator, with restricted access, to serve the main, upper, and rooftop levels of the building. 6. Renovate the south, or Hyman Mall, faGade, including replacing the existing storefront window system, rebuilding the recessed entry, reconditioning the original stone and brick, and restoring the wood and steel detailing to historically appropriate details and colors. 7. Repair the brick and wood cornice, and replace the balcony on the alley faGade. 8. Provide one residential unit on the upper and rooftop levels, to be designed within existing height and view lane restrictions for the property (except as relates to a Height Variance that was granted by the H.P.C. for the elevator shaft on May 9% 2001). 9. Refurbish all existing windows and retain existing original glazing, as allowed by the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and as requested by the H.P.C. 10. Replace roof over rear balcony to new height above brick header detail at windows, per H.P.C. request. The Applicant has shown a commitment to an "outstanding effort" in the significant renovation o f the front and rear facades. The proposed project will improve both the original building and the neighborhood as a whole. The renovation of the front fagade will return the building closer to its original design, including returning the storefront to its former design with a recessed entry and full-height glazing, and more historically accurate materials, detailing, and colors. This extensive renovation will bring the building up to the standard set by other fine renovations in the neighborhood, and make the architectural inventory of the area more accurate and. The proposed use of the building, by mixing michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.927.5366 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 21, P.O, Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 123 South Spruce Street, P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.0104 [f] 970.728.5739 0 0 . .4 residential and commercial uses, will benefit the neighborhood by adding to the sense of community in the downtown area. The residential space proposed for the roof level will be set back approximately 60 feet from the Hyman Mall faQade and approximately 12 feet from the rear facade, and therefore minimizing visual impact on the mall streetscape and alley. The intent of the project is to return the Kobey Building to its former architectural significance within the community of Aspen. The design represented in this Final Submittal is the same as represented in the Conceptual design that was approved on May 9th, 2001, with the exception of the southerly skylight. The H.P.C. approved the Conceptual design with the condition that the design of the southerly skylight be redesigned to be less obtrusive and produce less light pollution. In response, the Applicant proposes the current design which lowers the height of the skylight, removes the south-facing glazing and keeps a minimum of north-facing vertical glazing, and moves the fireplace and resulting chimney closer to the middle and west side o f the building. The chimney has been offset below the roof to bring the portion that rises above the roof north of the skylight as much as possible. To further reduce the impact of the skylight and chimney, the current design proposes moving the skylight, fireplace and chimney to the north from its previous location. The Applicant believes that these proposed changes would meet the objectives of the H.P.C. and creates a daylighting design that is of the quality of the project as a whole, appropriate for the neighborhood and the community. .. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT, PARTIAL DEMOLITION AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 428 HYMAN AVENUE, LOT Q AND 25 SQUARE FEET OF LOT R, BLOCK 88, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID #2737-073-39-011 RESOLUTION NO. ~--, SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicants, Loma Alta Corporation, have requested Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition and Variances for the property located at 428 Hyman Avenue, Lot Q and 25 square feet of Lot R, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is a historic landmark and is located in the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the ,, parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard. side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet. or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and .. WHEREAS, No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated March 28, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 28, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application with conditions by a vote of _ to _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition and Variances for the property located at 428 Park Avenue, Lot Q and 25 square feet of Lot R, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen be approved with the following conditions: l. HPC must inspect the existing windows before they can be approved to be replaced. 2. The applicant must provide more information about the balcony on the rear of the structure to assess whether or not it is an original feature. 3. Include garage doors on the rear fa~ade and remove as little of the existing wall as possible. 4. HPC grants a 500 square foot floor area variance for an outstanding preservation effort. .. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 28th day of March, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 0 ~-1 i --A . MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 428 E. Hyman Avenue- Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, Variances - Public Hearing DATE: March 28,2001 SUMMARY: The subject building is currently vacant, but previously contained commercial, office, and residential uses. The proposal is to renovate the interior for retail on the ground and lower levels, and residential on upper floors. The front faQade will be restored using historic photographs, a penthouse addition will be built on the roof, and alterations will be made on the back of the structure. APPLICANT: Loma Alta Corporation, represented by Michael Fuller Architects. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-39-011 ADDRESS: 428 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot Q and 25 square feet of Lot R, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: CC, Commercial Core, Historic District. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent pal'cels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional 1 0 0 - requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding: The proj ect involves restoring the streetfacing *ade of the building, modifying the alley fagade for the benefit of the residential unit, and making a small rooftop addition. In regard to the front of the structure, staff finds the proposed modifications to be an excellent effort to restore the building to its original character. The elements of the original storefront that are still in place will be restained, missing features recreated, and the paint will be removed from the masonry. The HPC should perform a site inspection to view the condition of all of the existing window units to determine if their replacement is appropriate. The preferred treatment is to restore the existing materials. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. â€¢ Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operation and groupings of windows. â€¢ Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them, whenever conditions permit. â€¢ Preserve the original glass, when feasible. On the rear fagade, the proposal involves extending a non-historic staircase to the roof level, removing and replacing an existing balcony, and creating an open parking area. Staff has no concerns with the staircase, but would like more information about the balcony to determine if it is historic construction. In renovations of similar historic structures in the downtown, the parking areas have had garage doors, which staff finds might be more appropriate than creating a large void in the wall. Building sections showing sight lines from the mall and alley have been provided to describe the visibility of the rooftop addition. It appears that it will not have a significant impact on the character of the building and has been pulled in far enough to address the design guidelines. 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building. â€¢ An addition should not overhang the lower floors of a historic building in the front or on the side. â€¢ Dormers should be subordinate to the overall roof mass and should be in scale with historic ones on similar historic structures. â€¢ Dormers should be located below the primary structure's ridgeline, usually by at least one foot. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. 2 .. A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: The project involves removing a portion of the rear wall to create two parking spaces to serve the residential unit. Having a mix of residential and commercial space is important to the vitality of the downtown, and having on-site parking makes the residential use more viable. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: The HPC held a site visit and examined the back of the building. There have already been numerous alterations in the area, and no significant features are being removed for the garage bays. However, staff has already stated a concern with having the parking area open to view and recommends there be garage doors. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, and Variances. finding that the review standards and design guidelines are met, with the following conditions: 1. HPC must inspect the existing windows before they can be approved to be replaced. 2. The applicant must provide more information about the balcony on the rear of the structure to assess whether or not it is an original feature. 3. Include garage doors on the rear ftwade and remove as little of the existing wall as possible. 4. HPC grants a 500 square foot floor area variance for an outstanding preservation effort. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2001." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2001 A. Staff memo dated March 28,2001 B. Application 4 .. â€¢ This will help preserve the original profile of the historically significant building as seen from the st:reet. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. â€¢ If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. â€¢ Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. The building is currently over the allowed floor area. Some of the interior spaces are being reconfigured. and about half of the garage will be exempted from FAR. In addition to those actions, a 500 square foot bonus is needed to accommodate the rooftop addition, and is being requested to recognize the restoration effort being made. Staff finds that this appropriate because the improvements to the faâ„¢le are much needed and will make a very positive contribution to the character of the Mall area. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: The building is located in the heart of the Commercial downtown. Its restoration is very important to reinforcing the historic character of the area. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The project will enhance the historic significance of the building by removing inappropriate alterations that have occurred over the years. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The project will enhance the architectural character and integrity of this commercial building by completing much needed restoration work. The work will be historically accurate, based on 19th century photographs. PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: rn 96 . MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director J~<3) FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 428 E. Hyman Avenue- Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, Variances - Public Hearing DATE: May 9,2001 SUMMARY: The subject building is currently vacant. The proposal is to renovate the interior for retail on the ground and lower levels, and residential on upper floors. The front fa~ade will be restored using historic photographs, a penthouse addition will be built on the roof, and alterations will be made on the back of the structure. The project was reviewed on March 28th and continued to this date for restudy. APPLICANT: Loma Alta Corporation, represented by Janet Lapin and Michael Fuller Architects. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-39-011 ADDRESS: 428 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot Q and 25 square feet of Lot R, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: CC, Commercial Core, Historic District. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between 1 C~Il & \ A "4 .. buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding: The project involves restoring the streetfacing fa~acle of the building, modifying the alley faQade, and making a rooftop addition. Staff finds the proposed modifications to the front of the structure to be an excellent effort to restore the building to its original character. The elements of the original storefront that are still in place will be retained, missing features recreated, and the paint will be removed from the masonry. On the rear fagade, the proposal involves creating a two car garage (note that the architect has revised the plan to include overhead doors at the parking area,) extending a non- historic staircase to the roof level, and removing and replacing an existing balcony and overhang. Most of the discussion at the March 28th meeting focused on the rooftop addition. The applicants had proposed to demolish the existing roof structure, a concept that the board rejected. The plan now shows the roof preserved, and includes a request for a height variance in the area of the elevator overrun. The variance request will be discussed later in the memo. Other elements of concern for the rooftop development were skylights/light monitors and flues. Staff does not support the request for the skylight that is closest to the front of the building. While it may not be visible from directly across the street, it will be visible from other nearby locations and is intrusive to the historic character of the structure. Staff recommends that it be removed or replaced with a flat skylight, and would recommend that the other skylight be flat as well. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. â€¢ Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. The applicant has also requested a 500 square foot floor area bonus in recognition of an outstanding preservation effort. Staff agrees that the restoration of the Hyman Avenue fa~ade is much needed and that the bonus is appropriate in this case. 2 .. b. The proposed development rejlects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: The building is located in the heart of the commercial downtown. Its restoration is very important to reinforcing the historic character of the area. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on tile parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The project will not detract from the historic significance of the building as a 19th century commercial structure. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The project will enhance the architectural character and integrity of the building by completing much needed restoration work. The work will be accurate, based on 19th century photographs. PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: The project involves removing a portion of the rear wall to create a parking for the residential unit. Having a mix of residential and commercial space is important to the vitality of the downtown, and having on-site parking makes the residential use more viable. Staff finds that this standard is met. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and 3 .. (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: The back of the building has already been altered numerous times. No significant features are being removed for the garage. HEIGHT VARIANCE Because of the HPC requirement to retain the original roof framing, the applicant cannot drop the roof plane and minimize the height of the penthouse as intended. The elevator tower, which has a 45 square foot area, is 2 feet over the 40 foot height limit. In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the HPC must make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and this Title; Staff Finding: The AACP promotes creating mixed use buildings in the downtown, with living spaces on upper floors. The project is in keeping with that goal. 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and Staff Finding: All areas of the penthouse living space have been designed to meet the height limit. The elevator tower has been lowered to the extent possible and is 2 feet over the height limit. Only 1.5% of the roof surface exceeds the requirement, and this area is pushed to the back of the building, so that it will not be perceived from the street. 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or 4 .. Staff Finding: The building pre-dates the City's height limits. A third story is allowed within the zoning regulations, and the applicant could build the entire unit within the requirement if the HPC would allow the roof plane to be lowered. The board has determined that would be inappropriate. b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the Aspen Area Community Plan and the terms of this Title to other parcels, buildings, or structures, in the same zone district; and Staff Finding: The height variance does not allow the applicant to build any more square footage that is available to others in the same zone district. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual approval, partial demolition, and a height variance for 428 E. Hyman Avenue with the following conditions: 1. Make all of the skylights/roof monitors flat and lower than the top of the parapet wall to limit their visibility. <Ub>0)31 SOO-\40/ U / 4/Al-ev \0444 2. The HPC hereby grants a 500 square fodt floor area bonus and a 2 foot Aeight C-41 (GLA limit variance for the elevator tower. 7 4-1 RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution No. , Series of 2001." Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated May 9,2001 B. Application 5 .. L THE KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, ASPEN SUBMISSION FOR CONCEPTUAL REVIEW 4, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FEBRUARY 9 TH ,2001 MICHAEL FULLER ARCHITECTS, P.C. .. 1Â®. michael fuller architects Historic Preservation Commission City of Aspen Community Development Re: Kobey Building Renovation Street Address: 428 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen Legal Description: Lot Q, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado Parcel Number: 2737-073-39-011 February 9,2001 The Kobey Building is located in the Commercial Core zoning district, listed on the City of Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures, and is an officially designated Historic Landmark. Please refer to the attached Vicinity Map. The site is approximately 3.121 square feet and topography is flat. The building covers 100% of the site, and as such there is no vegetation. The building has two floors and a basement of approximately 3,121 square feet each, and was most recently used as a retail space on the lower and main levels of the building. The upper level has most recently been divided between a - seamstress/tailor business, commercial exercise studio, and a dwelling unit. The building is currently vacant. and there is currently no parking associated with the property. The owner proposes the following renovation and restoration to the building: 1. Modify existing structure to meet existing structural code as relates to the proposed uses. 2. Provide exiting as required for the proposed uses of the building. 3. Provide two parking spaces off the alley. 4. Perform required modifications to qualify for a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Install an elevator. with restricted access, to serve the main, upper, and rooftop levels of the building. 6. Renovate the south. or Hyman Mall, fagade. including replacing the existing storefront window system, rebuilding the recessed entry, reconditioning the original stone and brick. and restoring the wood and steel detailing to historically appropriate details and colors. 7. Repair the brick and wood cornice, and replace the balcony on the alley faGade. 8. Provide one residential unit on the upper and rooftop levels, to be designed within existing height and view lane restrictions for the property. 9. Replace all windows with new insulated glass units that match the existing as closely as possible. as allowed by the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. - To complete this project, the Applicant requests three approvals from the City of Aspen Community Development Office. michael fuller architects pc 710 East Durant Street Aspen Colorado 81611 [t] 970.925.3021 [f] 970.927.5366 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 21, P.O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 [t] 970.927.6620 [f] 970.927.5366 123 South Spruce Street, P.O. Box 1529 Telluride Colorado 81435 [t] 970.728.0104 [f] 970.728.5739 .. First, the Applicant requests Community Development Director's approval ofa GMQS Exemption to create one free-market residential unit on the upper floors. as provided for in Section 26.470.070.D.2.a and D.3.a. The upper level of the building. currently vacant, has been used for commercial purposes in the past. Please refer to attached floor plans for conceptual design of the residential unit. To the best of Applicants knowledge, there are no recorded development or special review approvals for the property. This proposed change of use would increase FAR floor area. but decrease net leasable area. and therefore be exempt. Second. the Applicant requests approval for partial demolition. In order to provide two parking spaces on the site from the alley, Applicant proposes to remove a portion of the rear exterior wall. The opening would be approximately 28 feet wide and 10 feet high. Please refer to attached Engineer's Report as to the soundness of the structure and it's suitability for rehabilitation. As the opening would be on the alley elevation, it would impact the character of the neighborhood minimally, and would actually improve the neighborhood by providing additional parking. Please refer to the attached floor plans, building elevations and site plan. In exchange for providing these two parking spaces, Applicant requests an Exemption of 250 square feet of allowable floor area. Third, the Applicant requests an FAR bonus of 500 square feet in exchange for the "outstanding effort" in the significant renovation of the front and rear facades. The proposed project will improve both the original building and the neighborhood as a whole. The renovation o f the front faqade will return the building closer to its original design, including returning the storefront to its former design with a recessed entry and full-height glazing, and more historically accurate materials, detailing, and colors. This extensive renovation will bring the building up to the standard set by other fine renovations in the neighborhood, and make the architectural inventory o f the area more accurate and cohesive (graphic representation o f the architecture o f the neighborhood will be presented at the HPC Conceptual Reading). The proposed use of the building. by mixing residential and commercial uses, will benefit the neighborhood by adding to the sense of community in the downtown area. The residential space proposed for the roof level will be set back approximately 50 feet from the Hyman Mall fagade and approximately 15 feet from the rear facade. and there fore out of view from the mall streetscape and alley. The intent of the project is to return the Kobey Building to its former architectural significance within the community of Aspen. .. Ill *9"(91# . 1 ./1 1~ ~ .Â·43511*Â©*P- --- y. I- .1 i Â¥4: 'D ... 9~ ~ IT.% U - ,â€¢ r Â·;. 3 - I f 0 ''~b~ 'k .2 8 '3 : 1 4. .1:- ... ... .*.0, P., '. 5'i â€¢ , EU * 1.i , 1 I. 1 /1. 1 ./.*. '.41,4,11' 1 1 1 ... . D - r- .1-1 i i'~1 I .7...1.-= .1 ~.- 7. r. 1=,il .Gle'411 111~1.1~ 11-,1.,1~.10'.,1...11 '1 11 1' .1 1 4 . , - 117 - .4 . I. ,...0-1, ..9 Â· B'.* 1/ 1- ' I - .,1 -6... . U. lilli. 1 lilli 11, 1 1. 1.1 1 -- l. 411*71 -1, VII %.: &>.r -- 1 i J -g " .b'.0 1 - - 4 1 E Â·13 ?1' Â·Â·Â·'.i" ~~ 041: '.0 .'i *51 4 Â· 2; , L, T V . ':40&44â€¢.,4 ,~ ~ ..Â·,4 W . - It . 1 I .,1 64 - 1 1.1 . . ./ 1 -ArÂ·r -_-M , 9. 1 I . a -,1 â‚¬,1. 1. , 1 I -4. ,4-0.7 2 &- r: ' AW i , 5 1~ 6 i P Qi T, 2 , Â· 1.. &16. i. Â· ' I 'licÂ·&-~ -~ ~ - . ..1 . .M 1/ 1 0:/1114 41,1 C .'. 4 . .1 .1 11 . 1. .?f.*,0..r, i 4: 4-r 13 -t. :4 7- 11 . 1 4 , ' #r ..1 - - --10 L 0 - m; jl + ~'8 I & ..SÂ·1-4.1 > Â· ..0 4/4%45/4.. i HE Ht j m. li Nt L HE S MADE WEARING APPA R 4-6-4. 1 1 0 t- 1-r' *? 4/ * E IIi-~11:j@~G. . .1 *.11, 2 , A i ..Â· ' ' 6~Â¢~4 1,â€ž25 ~ ~'9 ' - 0' ' ~ ./ Â¢4=, 1 ' Lid: in . . d .4 R. 1.. 4.90. 014.1 .. '7 #: ..4. 1 ... - . '7- v. - i, * 6-, i Â·: 'Â· '' 1 1 ./.I 1.1 8, 1 4 ; 1 i 14 . . 1, 4 4. Â·: 1 7,71.'? 'Â·- Â· ~Â·'Â·, e,Â·:.1 :' I 1 7 U FÂ·. . r. I r .Â·.,2-*#-404*REA< 4 'fh~ '/ .k , IL 2 * -' . 4..j L X. . . 1 , */.'i/Â· 1/3. ~ 3'.4 41 - 4. ./ Â»466....1 142-*Litxt/f 1. ././.* Â·Â· .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name Kobey Building 2. Project location 428 East Hyman Ave. Lot Q, Block 88 and 25 SF of Lot R City and Townsite of Aspen (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bound*description) 3. Present zoning CC 4. Lot size 3, 121 SF 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Loma Alta Corporation P.O. Box 600105. Dallas. TX 75360 (214) 368-5264- 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Michael Fuller Architects, 23286 Two Rivers #24B, Basalt, CO 81621 (970) 927-6620 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA x Conceptual HPC - Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC - Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment x GMQS exemption x Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) One (1) two-story brick building w/basement. Each floor is approximately 3,000 SF, for a total of 9,000 SF within the structure Most recently used for retail and commercial purposes and currently vacant. 9. Description of development applicationRenovate front/south facade to historically appropriate storefront, details & colors; Repair cornice & brick on rear/north facade, convert upper-level to residential space. Â·arirl rpqirignfivl cpmep nn rnnffop and add two parking spaces. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? x Attachment 1- Land use application form - x Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form x Response to Attachment 3 x Response to Attachments 4 and 5 .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Loma Alta Corporation Address: 428 East Hyman A*entie Zone district: Commercial Core Lot size: 3,121SF Existing FAR: 5,933SF Allowable FAR: 4,681.5SF Proposed FAR: 6,055SF Existing net leasable (commercial): 7941 Proposed net leasable (commercial): 4541 Existing % of site coverage: 100% Proposed % of site coverage: 100% Existing % of open space: 0% Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 28' Accesory bldg: N/A Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 40' Accessory bldg: N/A Proposed % of demolition: 0% Existing number of bedrooms: 0 Proposed number of bedrooms: 3 Existing on-site parking spaces: 0 On-site parking spaces required: 0 per Historic Landmark Exemption Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 0 Front: 0 Front: 0 Rear: o Rear: 0 Rear: 0 Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: 0 Fronurear: 0 Front/rear: 0 Side: o Side: 0 Side: 0 Side: o Side: o Side: 0 Combined Combined Combined Sides: 0 Sides: 0 Sides: 0 Existing nonconformities or encroachments: FAR is 2: instead of required 1.5:1, open space is 0% instead of 25% Variations requested: FAR b6hus of 500SF for facade renovations. 250SF exemption for added parking spaces. (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) .. ATTACHMENT 3 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All development applications must include the following information (Section 26.304.030): v, 1. Contained within a letter signed by the applicant, the applicant's name, address and telephone number, and the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. Re /Â·\11 Act\ â‚¬P LE-B E R , U Â¢ M fte-tri#7 1 N . U 2, The street address, legal description, and parcel identification number of the property proposed for development. RE: LOCATION DUCRIplioN of ATTA<-liN\ENT 1 4 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel proposed for development, consisting of a current certificate from a Title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Ite- 4-NACM-â‚¬ D - J 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. RE: 277+CHEO. ,/ 5. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. 4- /?E: p/*9uu/*gs . J %. A site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado, showing the current status of the parcel including the current topography and vegetation. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Director if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) /2 6 : 3 f' x 36 " 47. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards , relevant to the development application. /RE : COVâ‚¬A Câ‚¬77â‚¬/2- . 8. Additional materials, documentation, or reports as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director. .. ISM PROPERTIES February 7, 2001 Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation Commission Aspen, Colorado Dear Amy, The following development application is being submitted to you by L&M Properties on behalf of Loma Alta Corporation. Applicant- L&M Properties / Janet Lapin 2129 Snowmass Creek Road, Snowmass, CO 81654 (970) 927-4471 Representatives: Michael Fuller Architects (970) 927-6620 Thank you for your attention. k <Jaffet Lapinfilnager L-4,&M Properties 2129 SNOWMASS CREEK ROAD, SNOWMASS COLORADO 81654. p (970) 927-4471 F (970)927-9057 0 . VICINITY MAP 1 5 -:: 3 - < C. . / esc>. - - rr Soruce St ~ ~ 12 2 /- S 3% - U.' : 4 .'..2-1 0 .- e 14-1 4* T HR Harold Ross Ct--1 - ~-1 -- -~.*~;,~~.%, ~'~4% ~ ,~it ~~'- ~ f CC Cowenhovel~Q. 7*9 6 12 11 - LS Luke Short Ct k E *cit& B,&- WC Williams Ranch Ctj PUROP Â©' 8 at - 7 '41| ip.'@,re ' 232 "4> Miners -m .* F 1 4 Trail Rd 65 05 9 9 9 74 f347:9.' . ts 7, 1 -- -:In- =0 1 0.1 --:- - 2% al- E n 94 1 Ve â‚¬.4/, CA.0 - vA ~ Â·1~Â©(0 2 r 2 1 Ca O* V 25 .- .S,- t 004 % 94 1 1 W L 6. 4 tH. Â¢5 0 e Cence Â» 'bede?\ i Ic%-*Ust 6 % Matck h A 0 - 9 54 % less Dr V/L{/ paege,~ 8/eeke ~T:- -*. 0444 #/ fin :A.-r Cark , rte,I . I 2 4 17 C U gl 6-f .2.Â·20.--:JUSE v. j King e ee +7 L 4 \J a v co White River Coo G & 3% , 6... . if Queen St e Av 5 4 0 me - 'L~yidiandp~~~ National Forest 2- 4 + 4 L e z ~4=kit-4~18?gen t ~Mascotte~lb -- E 2 21 e , iwilner~20 0 .c Pafk * 4 4 cy b h '<4 C# REMENt Grove*Rd -~"---- 226- admore Ct Juan S Â· .2} #awk 36- - De ie Av $. 7>g.D*. . 2 *f , g <Ff 'PSW , Dura 1 041/ G# 84 St Soark t â€¢ â€¢ 4 1 1 Â· :f ~ *S; '2 2 -#P .0.*Af# ~ Anel,00 y ~j â„¢â‚¬ Somm st - V . ,%24 .f if ,5 (3~B~ - * % 1 21 *0 n %1 C -1.}4EKGro;mN-=426 -4 2 : b 18- ~/h, Westwew Di - f 2. 4.4 Rivers 1 Ute PI - L <4& U E: 2 + r.-20- 9. A VA.2 - THE KOBEY BUILDING **~ 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE A 18. michael fuller architects SCh S 7 1/1 sh i jiff ........................ 01611~ z:Uwalt 4-low ~-f-T VIOLA O J U su.,A-10,1 of u,a =Al oi= *\7 el 0-6 ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All applications for demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation review must include the following information Applications which affect a structure which does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel shall only include the submission requirements listed in (a), (b), and (e). Applications for exemption from demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, or temporary relocation shall include all items specified in (a) and (b). 4 a. The general application information required in Section 26.304.030. RE.' A 7701Â·WOWEA/7 3 Â« b. A written description of the structure proposed for demolition, partial demolition, off-site relocation, on-site relocation, temporary relocation, or exemption, and its year of construction. ~7888~ Ret CovER LE17â‚¬R-OATED 2-9-ol . J t. A report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the structure and its suitability for rehabilitation. RE: LERTER- FA.oÂ¥ Sk Fâ‚¬/GME7*L EK!%,KIEâ‚¬C 67 D . d. For demolition or off-site relocation only: An economic feasibility report that provides: (1) Estimated market value of the property on which the structure lies, in its current condition, and after demolition or relocation. (2) Estimates from an architect, developer, real estate agent or appraiser experienced in rehabilitation addressing the economic feasibility of rehabilitation or reuse of the structure proposed for demolition or relocation. (3) All appraisals made of the property on which the structure is located made within the previous two (2) years. (4) Any other information considered necessary to make a determination whether the property does yield or may yield a reasonable return on investment. 4 e. For demolition, partial dernolition, off-site relocation and on- site relocation only: A development plan and a statement of the effect of the proposed development on the other structures on the R-Â£Â·' 69\.1Â« Lia-re:_ O,+:u 1,9Â·01 0 . property and the character of the neighborhood around the property shall be submitted so that HPC is able to make a finding whether the applicable standards are met. In the case of a demolition or off-site relocation, the development plan will be reviewed as a Significant Development application, pursuant to Section 26.415.010. UZ/UH/ZUUI UU:15 FA-1 97 UVZTUA/ Sh Feigntal Engr 12] U 1 . S K PEIG=HTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS February 8, 2001 Chris Beebe Michael Fuller Architects 23286 Two Rivers Road, Suite 24 P.O. Box 2618 Basalt Colorado 81621 fax 927-5366 Re: Kobey Building Remodel 428 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado Dear Chris, This letter is in follow-up to our recent discussion regarding structural design for the above referenced project, as it relates to the remodel of the masonry shell. Plans indicate opening the rear wall (alley side), to provide access to the main level as a parking area. In addition to designing the needed structural elements to handle the gravity loads over the new wall opening and parking space, lateral performance becomes a primary design parameter. The shell looses the "box" integrity by removing the exlsting masonry wall. As we discussed in our previous meeting, we recommend that a steel frame be designed to set within the new opening, sized to laterally brace the masonry walls formerly braced by the rear wall. A reinforced concrete cap may be required aIong the top of the rear stone foundation wall, in order to distribute the steel frame horizontal forces back into the foundation. We are currently proceeding with this concept for the schematic issue. Please call with any questions. Sincerely, Â«444 Stephen K Pefghtal, PE president sÂ¥:Pjage 01003 SKPE â€¢ 76 Sunset Drive â€¢ Unit #4 â€¢ Basalt, CO â€¢ 81621 â€¢ (970) 927-9510 â€¢ Pax: (970) 927-0597 Received Time Fec. 8. 11:11PM 1Â«Â« , FEB-09-01 11:10 AM JANET__ LAFÂ·IN 97e 9074471 P.el . . ASPEN/PrTKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CrrY) and ~ A 'J â‚¬ 7_ 2-04 //fu (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOW5: 1. APPLICANT has submited to CITY an application for blah,Pic,4-"c *Mioe,to,evie.+ :PArttiuf De,K61 va- 6-,6.*CeS #FAK boplus , A EU 1 (hertmafter.TE PROJECT). <Bf,4> S er :Wi/,Â¥,obc , 3 fec /â€¢E<fre 4, ect APPLICANT understands and agrees thaI Cit: r e .. .:C = Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999) estabUshes a fec structure for Land Usc apptications and the payment of all processin5 fees is a condition precedent to a determination of appliCadon comple:encss. 3. APPLICANI- and CITY agree that because of the size, namre or scope of the proposed projec:. it is not possible at this time to ascertain the filil extent of the costs involved in processing che application. APPLICAN: and Cn-Â¥ furcher agree rhar it is in the incereSI of the pardes that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to ther:after permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monrhly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may acrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by remining gremer cash Uquidity and will make additional paymenrs upon notification by rhe â€¢ CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred CITY agrees it will be benefzed through the greater cerminty of recovering im full Gosti to proccs, APPLICANT'S application. 4. CrrY and APPLIC.ANT further agree thar it i3 impracricable for CITY staff to comptete prccessing or present sufficienc information to the Planning Commission andlor City Council to enable che Planning . Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior tc decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees thai in consideâ„¢ion of the CrrY's waiver of im right to collect full fces prior to a determination of application compleceness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of S which is for hours of Community Development staff time. and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for rhe processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be ground> for suspension of proccisinj, and in no case will building permits be issued uncit all COit, U,ociard with caje proc=jins haye been paid. CrrY OF 85?ELY , APPLICANT B~-*6 Â£ C.* 41- ny:(11 4%~,4-0 - /$/Julie Ann Woods V F Community Development Director D.~/2-09-0, - Mailing Address: 1 12 q E 6.,0 CL> AA Ass. Cle *tb- Epou>&'esl 0.0 8(44 g:\support\forms\agrpay:ls.doc 12t27/99 r:'Clu:A , I I T me"FED. 9 10:16AM 1031!HOWÂ¥ E31103 13Â¥HJIA Adll:8 1000 'L '483 ..." .. 398228 10/22/1996 01:20P PG 1 OF 3 REC DOC NOT SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER 16.00 EASEMENT AGREEMENT 044 This Easement Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and effective this 9 - th day of October, 1996, by and among Loma Alta Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("Loma Alta") as owner of Lot P, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado (the "Lot P property") and Loma Alta as owner of Lot Q, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado (the "Lot Q Property"). This Agreement is made with reference to and in reliance upon the following facts: A Loma Alta is the record owner of the Lot P Property, including the building thereon (the Lot P Building"). B. Loma Alta is also the record owner of the Lot Q Property, including the building thereon (the Lot Q Building"). C. Loma Alta, as the owner o f the Lot P Property, desires to grant an easement to Loma Alta and Loma Alta's successors and assigns as owners of the Lot Q Property, through and across a portion of the Lot P Building for purpose of providing emergency ingress to and egress from the third floor of the Lot Q Building, as set forth in this Agreement. D. Loma Alta, as the owner ofthe Lot Q Property desires to grant an easement to Loma Alta and Loma Alta's successors and assigns as owners of the Lot P Property, through and across a portion ofthe third floor of the Lot Q Building for purpose of providing emergency ingress and egress to and from the third floor ofthe Lot P Building, as set forth in this Agreement. In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and other good valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Easement From Loma Alta as Lot P Owner to Loma Alta as Lot O Owner. Loma Alta, as owner of the Lot P Property, hereby grants and quitclaims to Loma Alta and Loma Alta's successors and assigns as owners of the Lot Q Building, and its residents, tenants, invitees, and guests, a perpetual non-exclusive easement southern and northern ends of the Lot P Property (or as the same may be relocated ftom time to time) and any interior spaces on the third floor of the Lot P Building leading from the stairways to the interior of the third floor of the Lot Q Building for the purpose of providing emergency ingress to and egress from the third floor of the Lot Q Building. 2. Grant of Easement From Loma Alta as Lot O Owner to Loma Alta as Lot P Owner. Loma Alta, as owner ofthe Lot Q Property, hereby grants and quitclaims to Loma Alta and Loma Alta's successors and assigns as owners of the Lot P Building, and its residents, tenants, invitees, and guests, a perpetual non-exclusive easement over, through and across the interior hallway located on the third floor of the Lot Q Building and running from the third floor entrance on the northern end of the Lot Q Building to the third floor entrance on the southern end of the Lot Q - Building (or as the same may be relocated from time to time) for the purpose of providing â€ž emergency ingress to and egress from the third floor of the Lot P Building, encumbering the Lot Q Building. .. 398228 10/22/1996 01:20P PG 2 OF 3 3. Maintenance. Loma Alta as owner of the Lot P Property and Loma Alta as owner of the Lot Q Property, and Loma Alta's successors and assigns as owners of the respective properties agree to jointly and equally share in the cost of routine maintenance of the easements described herein, including, but not limited to, the removal of snow and ice from the exterior stairways. Loma Alta as owner of the Lot P Property and Loma Alta as owner of the lot Q Property, and Loma Alta's successors and assigns as owners of the respective properties agree to undertake all activities performed in connection with the subject easements in good and workmanlike manner and as expeditiously as reasonably possible, and shall at all times perform such activities in complete compliance with all applicable construction, health, safety and other laws, regulations and codes. 4. Notices. Any notice hereunder shall be given in writing and shall be deemed etTective upon the date of personal delivery, or three days after deposit in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, and property addressed to the parties as follows: If to Loma Alta: Loma Alta Corporation 6210 North Central Expressway Dallas, TX 75206 Fax No.: (214) 368-2619 With Copy to: . John C. Shackelford True & Sewell 8080 Central, Ninth Floor Dallas, TX 75206 Telephone: (214) 368-1500 Fax No.: (214) 987-0696 Any part to this agreement, or its successors and assigns, may designate or change their address for purposes ofthis Agreement by giving notice as set forth above. 5. Binding Effect. The convenants and agreements contained herein contained shall be deemed conventants which shall run with the real property herein above described and shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of all parties having or acquiring any right, title, or interest, in the Lot P Property and the Lot Q Property. 6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto. There are no representations, warranties, covenants or understandings other than those expressly set forth herein. This Agreement may not be modified or amended except in writing signed by the parties hereto. 7. Cagtions. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be considered a part of or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision contained herein. 8. Attorney's Fees. In the event of litigation to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of such party's attorneys fee and expenses. .. Executed effective the day and year first above written. LOMA ALTA AS OWNER OF THE LOT P PROPERTY: LOMA ALTA COPRORATION, a BiÂ· a 9 4 n 4 Clifff4:r6~,<'Vice President LOMA ALTA AS OWNER OF THE LOT Q PROPERTY: LOMA ALTA COPRORATION, a Neast240*Rgiation, Â»(3 31 )(r* (-#68'y-MeAÂ« Vice President State of Texas ) ) as County ofDallas ) r34* Acknowledged before on this Ll - day of fbkh,A f , 1996 by Jerry Freeman as Vice President ofLoma Alta Corporation, a Nevada corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 04 -08 - 00 401Â·f:$121 jacqueline L Ausmus "' Notary Public, State 01Texas My Comm. Expires 04/08/00 Not* Pu, 398228 10/22/1996 01:20P PG 3 OF 3 r .... HÂ¥MAN MALL PROPERTY LINE 7 1 < DN#iF ........ 90617- 0 449 71 -1 - ALLEÂ¥ RETAIL U- 0 .1 2 1 -an._â€ž __~ rm-vmm-rÂ·J-- -:- br 25.0' , 4 1) SITE PLAN Scale 1/16" = 1' - 0" 22 92111 111 CA T.O. FLY u-In HYMAN AVENUE MALL ~ 138'- 10"0~ ~~11111111111111111111Illil~Ii!1111111111111111Â·111it=:I li p OCI Il RESIDE~IA!~ 99 \ ALLEY 11 no -m Nt 'V12*-e- 1 .....t.......................................=.==....................... ..........==.7.................+.+--"....4.-..."; -..............................................+...+..................- REBIDENTIAL~ ITI, Z gh T o. Per El Ir-11[*31010[1- O[1 ~44 - 0 1 - 064' y RETAIL SPACE GARAaE 1.. @ MALL ELEVATION = q #'~ 10" ZI~ T.O. PLÂ¥ 1/ 1 33' 3" ~' I ALLEY ELEV.~ . .1 RETAIL SPACE - ~ = Maul 06~-~~" 6 michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ~ SITE SECTION Scale 1/16" = 1' - 0" L -311!jao'Nci 7 9 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 . 111 1 1 1 PROPOSED 1- dcHANICA-_ 111 1 |ROOM 111 1 -0 1 1 1 W 1 1 11 1 Ill I 1 111 1 1 .1 1 1 V 111 1 A 121 1 --- flk-A-'-F J z z_ =1=-7 7 ----- 1 111 1 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1. 1 11 1 1 111 1 1 111 1 ~E- E-ZE-EZ -E: â‚¬ ~ 3 -- ~l-Z -- 1 111 1 1 111 1 111 1 1 111 1 =F====== 1 111 _1 L_ _ _ _| 1 1 111 1 EIXISTING RETALIL h'qCHANICA 1 SPAÂ¢E ROOM 1 1 11 1 1 111 1 --2 -E E- 3- 2-2~ ri 5--IL----Ii 1 -=1 C=== 1 1 1 1 1 1--r-- 1 1 1 --El 1 1 1 UP I 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4, 1 \1 1 4 18. I michael fuller architects 1 KOBEY BUILDING . 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE k 1 0 <00 LOWER LEVEL Scale 1/8" = 1' - 0" -1 .. dne -1 f' , /4 til ALLEY ~ REMOVE EXISTING VVALL FOR r- PARKING ACCESS. REPAIR BRICK ~ ABOVE OPENING 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROPOSED ' : PARKING 1 a :i 5 8 4 S.F. ~ 1 k H 1 PROPOSED I I PRIVATE ENTRANCE 1 1 ' E . I.- -1 -- -- -- ----- 1 1 1 1 1 h I . 1 1 & 1 1 1 1 11 1 + -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTING 1 ' RETAIL ~ 1 1 SPACE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I LINE OF | PARTIAL FLOOR EXISTING I | FLOOR --~1/A, 1---- INFILL USING FAR ~ BONUS AND , DN - ,\> O PARKING / / 1 J EXEMPTION. 1 ~ V RE: ATTACHMENTS ' / / L--- 1 11 1 , 1 .// / i 6 / -//:i~... 4 1< o If //1 i<3 // Â· OrEN TO U_.--221 BELOR la. . 1 34 16 1 , michael fuller architects â€¢ KOBEY BUILDING STOREFRONT RE|NOVATED TO MORE 1 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE HISTORICALL~ ACCURATE DESIGN A 9 + A MAIN LEVEL Scale 1/8" = 1' - 0" dno .. doc--------- , 0 '' , . 41 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - U C. -1 - 11 I " 1 1, 11 1 11 11 12 9-F- -- ~ -71 liU U I 1 1 AT J n 'OF 1 4 11 1 ill 11 1 1 ---1 rLr ;; ~~ i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18. 1 michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 1 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE A_ <(30 ROOF PLAN Scale 1/8" = 1' - 0" .. .0 0 . F U >41*=am=22**aa;~*maaÂ¢*mam tmommwommgomwmmamomam#wigamap . .1 -- ~ BATH i STAIRRAY ROOF GARDEN 5 I. elt 3 : 1 ' 1 10 1 1 '00 - _ __ _F_ _1-W_~ A,1 j ' i '_ 1~| 24~ 1 1 8 /1+1\ A lilli 3--f--.ar 2 _ z 1 32 2 231 --3Â¥1=,0 - -- I 4#2\/.1- I - -- BEDROOM BATH ~ ~ ~ HALL MAÂ¥ 1 1 i El= 9 lu] 100 00 1 T - /77.- STAIRAAÂ¥ r - RETAIL SPACE RETAILI ~ HYMAN ALLEY GARAGE J VESTIBULE HALLAAÂ¥ 212-/ 0 - ENTR MALL T.F,P 43444Â«~ > 25t>~ ~ 32 J 2 -*324= -Ii E Â£~ r â€ž â€ž W W W F RETAIL SPACE l _ _ __~_ A BUILDING SECTION - Scale 1/8" = 1' - 0" 18. michael fuller architects - KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L .. .0 0 . 0 LO. PLY 138'-6" mi mi!!!i~1~!ff,jir~ftlb-(mlm f~!!!!ilm!!!!iftiln(!ti!!ilb~Umf(!in!!ilarninmfnnfinitrin~lilifiiil[m[Iim-niililiT:-mm,u:,142~3 ROOF GARDEN SITTING FNET BAR J BEDROOM ROOF GARDEN m . *1 . /14 11 126'-6" Ef43-'------:= --z- - E I. '1~ I -- 2 - I i -- DEN BA-k y 3Â«TH j J SITTING BEDROOM LIVING KITCHEN . a -, - .-'I'# 00 n rl Do j off I ' 1 ~00/ 1 13'-1 1" 1 NMHAN .- HALL RETAIL ENTRÂ¥ RETAIL SPACE GARAGE ALLEX ~ T.O. FLÂ¥ ~ 10+91.,_--- 13 \ - 1 -'-Ii A L ": I 'x A.':'.'.a'x'.' .-:I-12'75,1.'IMA ..1.9.1,9.4- ' W W U RETAIL SPACE EXISTING MECHANICAL RETAIL BFACE ~ T.O. SLAB 9 01- 9" /53 BUILDING SECTION - Scale 1/8" = 1' - 0" 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE L .'. 0 4 . El -1 1=11== = 1=1 A 1.M.1.0.3.-Â°OÂ°MÂ° tEoM.Mol.Mo Mor.Mo -1.3.0.cÂ°-Â°nor 1 .-I- I ./ ' 1 1 ---- 1 1 1 1.1 1--1 4-11 \24 L-2.-2 -' 1 L--f - L---j L.-4- 1-, -2 . ., , .. 1.- 1 * 4 lili , t 1 1 1 1 r + lilli , , 1 11 1 1 .1 -+ 1. C 1 11 L..6 : II'i 11! - 1 ' 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 j ; 1 1 1 1 le it, ' Â·~ 1 2 1 I 2 iii L 111 1 1 .1 I 1 2 1 1 it 4 1 : j -1 -- - - - , .. 0 1. - F==1 1 1 ~ 1 1 -1 1 , 1 - SOUTH ELEVATION (EXISTING) KOBEY BUILDING, 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 1Â®. michael fuller architects .. ./....I- Â· ..'.a,-â€ž"*2==-*-n:, *-a r- ...,----- 1 Ify--~11--,4 0- 21~4 1- ----- -.....' -- 1 i 1 b . in : 'i . i 9 i i If 1 Â·Â·Â·i = A *AE,es> 1 i ;.1 A*'Â©k:5â‚¬rr,a.u . .Â· r, OH,-r'ArIP Ezer ~~--- - ~ ' - - - - ' - - 4i < -'''- -~t r === 'flf-Tâ€¢ /(t:Â© "tÂ· IMCE;/t.~-=: i I'.-& f,1 0/ 11 . d '14~ 1. l' 1, 11 b 'L I -1 Lilli.1---VILLILr - . -4 U Lk .[ll u *94 1:NM- *COMOMOMOMOMOCIOMOCIOMOMotloMoMotknouo@00000[lor -16 - &. ' '-- , FRAohdb:Tbe t -1 -1 . L -- 1 - -1 ; , _7-4- -.1 - , 1\ tiCLJ= 41-0--~~rf~-13{6 *-I _ 2.f........... 'Al--11:r-- - 14â‚¬/MouE pA/NT E J 1 L-----~r.: 9 - . 1 --r 1 -1 ..... - PER.GUIPEUNES 23-n 4-1- 94 1 , , .1. . t ! 1 1 .4-Iti ..7 1 Â·/ Â·Â· - "~Â·- I "---Â·' --'Il"-Â· Â· --'Â° Â·Â·Â· Â·Â· pIf-..... f ruff L, ..122-kn Â·- 1 -- ~ Ab AlloWED I- 73- -..., 1..." ~1 --~------- -: r.-1-- . 1 1 --t--r r-2-1 -L. 1 p-I +i -ti â€¢ BY 6140â‚¬UNâ‚¬5. . -t# i ' : 1 , i 1 -,L ' ~~ ~3'40''AC ~ Y A/ Mrj;~~f-~2 Ja~Al';j: ' 9 k JLDÂ·.,~Â·~1>-f'.Â· '-2Â·1%-7.~~4>'71 Dir :-.7:' iep~51:4/.,-Â·11> tr ~, V t ).Uf~Â·. <Â·Â·11*431fyor d-Li~Â· P<t,1.. :4.- ~ It 1 --1 1 1 1. 1 '' 1 , ' 1 11'.1 'lid. '1 | | | ' 1 11, 4 4. i ' I . 1 / ..../1 , = Nt,0 4499 P . -q)*UISE//RE&70,43 UzzED Dâ‚¬-[AlLÂ»161 0 0 -' - - WEW Woet> PANELS 1 --- En--3 2-1 - . a 1233 1424 1 1 ! 77=1.-7 il , EX/$7/%6 STONE SOUTH ELEVATION (PROPOSED) KOBEY BUILDING, 428 f EAST HYMAN AVENUE 18. michael fuller architects .. ..1 . . 1. 22Â»15 -122 v)18: 11111111 III :, i ve:P , 1 1 11 lili 4 j tio- 7 1 't ..1 1 1 - 1 j.1.--/-2. ; . 1 Â£ 1. 1 1 $ t r. *'-I - 12*5 'Agit.Adap t I K -4 %! 1 . 1 B '-1 , 1 1-12.27-7.-1--t- - . -- --- .' - 9 - L --.- - 1 -1 1 ! 1. Â·1Â·Â· 1 1 -1 1 1 ... 1 - 1 , 11 -! 1.4-- 1 - 1 .1 1 . .1 - . 4 - ~r,- ~a 1 . . 1 (. ..! 1 1 1 r 1 L - ,-Il--_Th .1./.-- i --. .. ..2.2 ilit.... I f -1 1 1-- 11 1 - 1-1 Iii - 1.L_-1 1 1.1 -1 ... i - 4 1 60"m> j " _ 1 CeNÂ» 63'TER-l,44 F - 1 .1 6 1 1 .1 i',1---'..1.- Â· ' - -1-2.. ' ---Â·~LE.1 1 1 =tulprE-'211 -1,~Â©1 1 , ' R.ti~91~ III.7 .-~ i-, 'EMA*-AM-L-,7 , 2 t ~4- -*4Â·I 1 4-21.2~J -_.___..#_A_ --1 1.-. -T-t-x .- --v. 1-. ---I-- -1 --1.---- '. . ..- pal VI fl - ~VE--*EftWEE=k T 1, 7,4-1.-1.-1 !. -1 'Â·Â·eT - - -*- -I--.2.r4 -.C- 1-1 - 1 -L- .-1 2 '2Â¥1&%12 tamÂ«k\- ' T 1 1 0 ;Â· 7---- Â· NORIH ELEVATION (EXISTING) KOBEY BUILDING, 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE NA. michael fuller architects 1 . 1. ' 1 - - emE*Â»4 of 4--7 (AleD]EU-Â· --) 1 - 11 1 1, h 146-te.t- 111 11 14,573*<~tt\Â·14 ill .1 222---Â·-lri - C.hkÂ·* Lit. 1 ./ 1 --- .. r 0 Exts,n.44 .17-- 1 11 It' 11,1, 1*:ACKA'-\:31 -v.li -1 1 1 1 /1 1 1 , 1 1 11! Flt b..N\Er, 1 1-l/ 020 111 1 114-1 ,? 1. 1 -r \1--4 T. ... 1 1 -1--- Uwoodf:7 -0 , -yÂ·LÂ·: etil.kker > . 1 1 :--' : Fl)Â¢Ft> 1 ' 0.Â¥ 3 ALL. c.''Ak't , I 'd 61Â£OD 1 1 1 1 1 f ~ r ~ PARML -.-.- , I. ' , 1. 4-~ IL-I, ===n ... --... & . 1 -1 - 1 17~=n I ' rt .1 -1 -| - 1 -1 --I 1 - L~ 2-r 1 --1." . 1 ----4.---- --'.------% ' . -1--' -'.--' ...m=.------ 1 11 ~| ~ -'l fl t ~'' 1 0 1 1 " I I 1- f i *.1 -- , - i ' 1 IL-11 1 1 /' 1 -4.- 1 -Â·- ' 1 L .r. -1 - ~- -- 1. .1 1 1 4 (- t-(eul ~ pnz={73-TEÂ·'7-7--J'L..I-I;-12--fl--Af t--"' 1.21 -- -1 - / [/U---4. I .a , I FliT L I . .h, *iltÂ»(_1< 1 ....E L \I -ir. ir r -- i --i: k -7.Nr..111 -- 1.-222-- 1-11-2037- ~+ 1 - 0%1444 ---- =1.--tt 2-1-:Ii- 12 + lE =E 70* 9- 114*Â¥444 -=-1 92=01<LT ' 2 F -14.- LL--11 =F=rk - .- T.VUL-N -77-?- O 0 -UZZI --112 --1-+ 1 - -Ct'.Of- 1-'92/--T-, Â· . NORTH ELEVATION (PROPOSED) -KOBEY BUILDING, 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 1Â®. michael fuller architects r .. .... f#catiet, a~-[*dia Â·elitie 7 1 1 1 - 1 -2:tt-2 -PAH<Efu .erc>wÂ·\* - -4 1-454em.6O14F6776 k,36Â£~41- 54Â«6-bl 12> U (Lpist< 7 194Tâ‚¬*,Ap- **Acuâ€¢ed,zte 18 va _ 1 2 Ret..10/* 7 mIlo, r E- 4343. 0Â»40"1 UAL#* 2 - ! 'IN'ININ, 1, '1111 ki*i 44,4 _~4-L- - Nla,1 H.Deâ€ž,Qcue- 0 // *,0566,a.Wor rh WEST ELEVATION - Scale 1/8" = 10 - 0" 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 0. .... Hteâ„¢-- ' 1~-trglodâ‚¬*5 4â€¢PAC= --~ p.-lat - 1. = j i - p 0- 2-INC.01>A+L- â‚¬:=10 1~1 Gr - ---4- i A k A El #*27 J t*RCM-- 60+10,4 WALL_ - ID d*1*1 ALLEX MALL EAST ELEVATION - Scale 1/8" = 1' - 0" michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 0 0 0 0 Ill lf) Ill Ill Z _1 Ill Z j -1 r ul< m Qz 111 4 1- 0 0 LILI 0 q M 0> I ILI I< 1 'tjAIN *IREEI yIEPN-Pl-ANE- 6.5Â° ~ PiÂ»*M/m' ii&24'WiA........:.'I:,&p --- :'Â·3;3493*SES@...59* 35*430.**/4': A ~ <4;:IRI - Â· Â· Â· Â· ~:JUi.FÂ¢~54% *432â‚¬AT>N%?~Uwl/b./*'**:E**0E**0****,Â·...Â·..(Â». ,'~. g : . Â·Â·.%.iÂ·w.Â·.Â·.Â·..Â·.Â·0m.Â·.i.Â·.Â·.mmm.Â·.Â·.Â·.m.Â·Â·mmm.Â·wmm.Â· ' 'I :,â‚¬r@Â·2RP'bP>%%REEREJfâ‚¬6â‚¬>2Â·'Â·'EG* I: 2 ?3i??>:%2Â·:xxÂ·Â·,:Â·:eÂ·Â·:x:.Â·<Â·Â·iÂ·Â·:Â·e, #0.*':R,Â· - Â· - 4"4*4*-41', 111'k -/,*â€ž~4 - 2 ELEVATION ;" 13{..4~:KE.'/.56~. 'll'MAY:.4/:2,4,0:' I * %*7&.:62'Â·Â·Â·Â· ~ 79 11.7' 1 - i ELEVATION i 7 q 0 6.q' 100' 4 : 100' , 75' 100' . . 100' , 100' , I .0 .0 4 0 21' 21' C-h VIEW PLANE SECTION DIAGRAM Scale 10' = 50' - 0" 18. michael fuller architects KOBEY BUILDING 428 EAST HYMAN AVENUE iHÂ¥MAN , BUILDING 133316 NIVH ALLEÂ¥ A311V 1 17611 A LEGEND AND NOTES G FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: 0 10 20 P I TK IN COUNTY T I TLE, 1 NC. CASE NO. PCT 14677C6 DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2000 CALLS IN C ) RECORD A UTILITY SURVEY CONTROL SET I FOOT WITNESS CORNER (BRASS TAG STAMPED 25947) FIRE ESCAPE BUILDING ENCROACHES ON ALL SIDES - ROOF - COOLER DECK IN 75*09 11 (N 75 30 9 ROOF Â°09 11*W) ALLEY BLOCK 88 f a 3/.09 00 EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECEPTION NO. 398228 F ~ W 59.18*) l 0 V / 8 SEPERATE WALLS ~ BUILDING /.00 1 1 .W 1 P Ul 009.11 W 59 40 1 18. 0 Q SEPERATE WALLS ~ 3 R 2 STORY BRZCK - BUILDING WITH ~ BASEMENT O Â· 0 10 t k, 3 STORY BRICK - BUILDING WITH CERTIFIED TO: / BASEMENT C P ITKI N COUNTY T I TLE, 1 NC. EASEMENT AGREEMENT ~ ~ 8 RECEPTION NO. 398228 . Â® MDI HOLDINGS, INC. COURT ' O LOMA ALTA CORPORATION YARD ~ g 41 e THE UNDERS I GNED STATES THAT FIELD SURVEYED DURING Jil ROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS 2000 AND IS ACCURATE 44 BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO r DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUNDARY L I NE CONFL I CTS, ENCROACHMENTS, ~ EXCEPT AS HEREON OHAWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND (5 EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF *AY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME, IN 75Â°09 30.09') 1 - APPURTENANCES Â·#'WIN suRVE'foR ARE,i'*koN#,OMMMINSS&~VMC~~DvM 3%[t~16:EPSIYAPED lili. WITH THE S B 30 9 2~ BELOW. DATED:IllifIEÂ£9~ A / 1/21 tr - ROOF - 60.18') . 1 - i , 94,/4LLA, 'mimiiul , nu\\1* DEPOSITED THIS ____DAY OF 2000 IN BOOK __-___OF THE (4 75'09./ / .11 . AS RECEPTION NUMBER THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT COUNTY CLERK - S LAND SURVEY PLATS/R IGHT OÂ¢ WAY iURVEYS AT PAGE____ ' COMPLIES WITH SECTION 38-51-102 COLORADO R#VISED STATUTES. SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. 4, COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER HYMAN AVENUE HYMAN AVENUE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY MALL OF LOT 0, NAIL IN CONCRETE BLOCK 88 Â® NW. COR. BLK. 89 0 AND A STAIp OF GROUND 25 FEET IN LENGTH ONE FOOT IN WIDTH 00 - -Â·- - DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1 'k P BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN LOTS Q AND R IN BLOCK 88, CITY AND TOWNS ITE OF ASPEN SAID POINT BEING 75 FEET L DISTANT FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT Q: THENCE EASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGELS TO SAID BOUNDARY LINE I FOOT: THENCE NORTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID LAST MENTIONED COURSE 25 FEET: THENCE WESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID LAST MENTIONED COURSE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT R AND 1 FOOT TO THE ' ~ 2 NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT Q: THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO LAST COURSE AND ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOTS Q AND R 25 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. (S 75Â°09 BASIS OF BEARINGS 11.E) CONTAING 3,034 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS CITY OF ASPEN: COUNTY OF PITKIN: STATE OF COLORADO. (74.00) - PREPARED BY Â® CHISLED 'X- IN STEPS ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC ~ NOTICE. ACCORDI NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU PUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL NW. COR. BLK. 95 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET HORIZONTAL CONTROL ASPEN, COLORADO 81*11 PHONE/FAX (9701 925-3816 UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS .1 7...: arY:o~RST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT HAY ANY ACTtON DATE JOB '~~ -, -'7..:~ UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN 7/00 25058A YEARS FROMÂ·THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION 15 VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR 40 ENTRY 10*toN WALL N 14Â°50 49 -E 100.00 /00.2 100.2 75.0 88/12 CS 140 ENTRy .4% .0 . 1 A LEGEND AND NOTES. I 4#44 G FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCR I BED TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: . . IE 0 10 20 P I TKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. CASE NO. PCTI 4677C6 1 DATED: FEBRUARY 17, 2000 1 Â»2 CALLS IN C ) RECORD UTILITY SURVEY CONTROL SET I FOOT WITNESS CORNER (BRASS. TAG STAMPED 25947) FIRE ESCAPE BUILDING ENCROACHES ON ALL SIDES - ROOF - COOLER DECK . 30.9 ROOF e (N 75 3 ALLEY BLOCK 88 a 00 4, (N 75 EASEMENT AGREEMENT 1 Â°09-11-W RECEPTION NO. 398228 1 59.18.) . V / 2 SEPERATE WALLS N 75 OoP . BUILDING 1.00Â·'t..W P N 75Â°09'11 W 1 59.18. Q SEPERATE WALLS 11 2 STORY BRICK ~ BUILDING WITH ~ ~ BASEMENT 4 3 STORY BRICK Â· 44 BUILDING WITH CERTIFIED TO: d 4.1 / BASEMENT 44 P I TK IN COUNTY TITLE, INC. EASEMENT AGREEMENT 0 6+ l RECEPTION NO. 398228 4 MDI HOLDINGS, INC. LOMA ALTA CORPORATION YARD ~ ~:9 ' 41 THE UNDERS I GNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING JUU-1 2000 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO X' DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, i CD EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF *AY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME, EXCEPT AS HEREON 11 It UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES,BMM~~0~lbIENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE (N 75Â°09 S SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED lili. 30 i ~ W OR BELOW. 30 9 Â·09Â·) D % :i ROOF J .4 U %96 .'' Sem / F p ... Lf ..499 w#,1403(frg64Â·Â· ~. DEPOSITED THIS ___DAY OF 2000 IN BOOK OF THE 1 1 -1, 4 /4/4/llitill'mut (N 75Â°09 60./8') COUNTY CLERK' S LAND SURVEY PLATS/RIGHT OÂ¢ WAY Â§URVEYS AT PAGE____ AS RECEPTION NUMBER THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH SECTION 38-51-102 COLORADO RtVISED STATUTES. 1 SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. 4W COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER HYMAN AVENUE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AL L - BEG 1 NNING AT A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN LOTS Q AND R OF BLOCK 88 NAIL IN CONCRETE LOT Q, Â® NW . COR . BLK . 89 AND A STIi I P OF GROUND 25 FEET I N LENGTH ONE FOOT IN WIDTH DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1 A IN BLOCK 88, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN SAID POINT BEtNG 75 FEET { ~ DISTANT FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT Q: THENCE EASTERLY AT , RIGHT ANGELS TO SAID BOUNDARY LINE I FOOT: THENCE NORTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID LAST MENTIONED COURSE 25 FEET: THENCE HYMAN AVENUE WESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID LAST MENTIONED COURSE AND z ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT R AND I FOOT TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT Q: THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO LAST COURSE AND ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOTS Q CS 750 AND R 25 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. 09 11 E) BASIS OF BEARINGS CONTAING 3,034 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS CITY OF ASPEN: , COUNTY OF PITKIN; STATE OF COLORADO. (74.00) PREPARED BY Â® CHISLED X' IN STEPS ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC - i NW. COR. BLK. 95 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET HORIZONTAL CONTROL ICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS m ='Florow:W'l: Nli: mÂ¥96 &,NY,1&2~~~ â‚¬'ON PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 '~ .' Apt CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE DATE JOB YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTPFICATION SH- HEREON. THE 7/00 25058* SURV#YOR. ~-----Ill.*.I.*....=*.....-I------I--~-I--I~-I---.I-=---I...-I-. , Ill 40 1Â°50'49 E) 75,0 49-El .00' COMON WALL N 14*50'49-6 100.00 fN /4Â° /00.2 (S /4 40.2 75.00 CURB '50-49-W) ENTRY 9. I I EXIT STAIRS l - EXIT STAIRS ~ 11 1 / K. 1 L-1 re Z =6 -- 1 / f PROPERTY LINE -7 / U.\ c 3/imalÂ¥*illill./.........4/10.1 WET'.''~Â·.4:.ti.,ifg:49 ~1: 1--Â£1- ~/ft-1 1l ~1[ I Ncil- I I 'dn HYMAN y Â· Â· -- F\----1/ 1 11--111.1,1 AVENUE Ill 1 -A MALL .4\ f] L -' 1 ALLEY 1 11 4 1 1 \ / i PROPOSED / r 1 1 00'-01' . RETAIL I A PARIdINe \/ 0 9 E- 10' j 5 8 4 5.11 A 1 98'-6/ CD () SPACE 1 1 \ r 4 2 MELy 1/ 1 2 7 \ -- .g &31 61 ~ SITE PLAN - v NORTH 100'--2 3/8* L Scale 1/8" = 1' - 0" ' ' < I. 0 MAX. BLDG HT 0 138'- 10" I I ~MHNNLM'l 'IlllIll I~Illl Il Ill IlllIlllIilllIlllIll IlllII Il~~Illl!1Illl Ill INHNIINHal 1 J 1-0 CO - - > RESIDENTIAL <Z ILI LLI LM"th 00 0- CNI CO 1. - 0 *93 10 &1 9 thmEamsÂ«asÂ«=:Ills>=---=~asmc=a~,~'m=kÂ«21Â»=a==~eas=Sce=2'E'~t y-=====>- 1 9 0 5 0- .00 Aks . 8082'041-21.~33~ * 4 9~ RESIDENTIAL 4 8332-14 3 HYMA el AVENUE -*imrd EN=.6 - - 4/0 470 1 61=I Â¥ M ELEV. RETAIL ALLEY GARA62 FIN. FLR. MALL ELEV. . ELEV. It &..,1-*94Â£4~:*7~~C..~'5'.:'~..#3~".9.-Err:222 ~Â· Â»,w,4-11'1~,2,3.mim 'Y , Y q.~~.~4...~0*.Iâ€ž7.*.*,+1â€ž.*I.*. *AW#% ' 98'-b" 100'-0" .fr- =05*> RETAIL 11. . 1. ... .. .. .. .. . 1~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION *~ SITE SECTION COMMISSION - Scale 1/8" = 1' - 0" FINAL READING I . 1.4 1 - 1 1. .1.,03. 4? C. 3 .:?J--:f.Â·:24*: fit l.Â·kri-.6-flÂ·.51 (;:U-Â·.2.1...2.iÂ·> -4.:7. All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the propelly and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be - used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written pe,mission. Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the e attention of the Architect prior to commencement of the work. PROJECT NO: 20016 DRAWN BY: CB 4-: i CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 5/29/01 FILE NAME: A:dÂ·Â·~pt:*Â»Â·.~; ::#*If71%::~:1*~~7-~r"f-Â¥t.3....4 SITE PLAN AND SECTION 1/8" = 1' - 0" Al.1 itarat./ 19'* 1Â·'Â· spel!40.le Jetin; leello!LU 99Â£9 216 026 01 0399 226 026 1 LE91.9 03 *leseg Bl.SE x08 'O-d 'tâ‚¬ 01!ns 'PeoW Sle/4hl 0/~1982Â£2 3nN3AV NVWAH 6â‚¬29 81Â£ 0Â£6 [1] VO LO 8ZZ 026 [J] 9Â£,18 03 epiANe.L 689 K (08 '0'd 'leells euid lAnes 0 32'-O" SNIallne *380>I Â©h=51924 .. mÂ· Â· 7... k . 4 > 0 0 -1 0 AO M z LULU 4 > HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - FINAL READING All designs, ideas, anÂ·angements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the Job site. Any dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of the work. PROJECT NO: 20016 DRAWN BY: CB CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 5/29/01 FILE NAME: FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1' - 0" A2.1 P. . 9 'ef:y guam 1,4 - 1 -U Spel!4OJB JellnJ lee40!Ul 99Â£9 226 026 [J 0199 216 026 1 LE919 03 ;leses gLE x08 .Od 'tâ‚¬ 81!ns 'Peobl SieA!hi OM.1. 983Â£3 3AN3AV NVINAH 6Â£19 912 026 [1] VOLO WEL 026 Il] 9â‚¬*Le 00 ep,Inile.L 6191 x08 -o d 18849 euid 401109 00Â£ 9Nlalln9 *390>I 0 - ... -. e. . * .2 . =. . r Y i. A P . - . .. 9 - - - I -- . . - . .. --. e E===== -.. 1 - Ze I ... ) I ... *.. -*.. . . = - .. -. .. -- . e e . -- . = - 1 . .. 0- m . ... .- 1 00 01 . *.. 2--1 -- - . . 0 - 0 . -.. .... I.- P -.. -.. . 0 - 0 A ,/4 --- ./.4 te,-- -A . - . . 2 -. P - - 0 . r . . m. 0 :@ e .. . .i- il . 0- - . . - = . = - -0 . - -.. = = = =. ' =. - = e e = = = . .. . . 41 . = = == . = -. - 0 = = = = = = . = = = = = = = 0 = ;/ . 0 . 0 . - 0 . . . . . V-- . . . â€¢ e. - e 1 1.1 1 rt RECONPITION aRICK A 2 1 /1\ CLEAN AND REPAIR ,/ 2 1 STAIRS, RAILINGS, n \elf 7- AND REBUILD CORNIC,E ~ 'g~~~;1 **ay, 1 , \ REMC M, ST STE CLEAr ST] PROL HAI PE i k CD Z III D m LU CO 0 1 k HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - FINAL READING All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of the work. PROJECT NO: 20016 DRAWN BY: CB CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 5/29/01 FILE NAME: FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1' - 0" i / 1 ~ L_ Woop DETAILS, AND coloR 0 2 ) rin UPPER LEVEL ~ _1_1 i 21 Ci) ROOFTOP LEVEL ~ 41/ AS APPROPRIATE 4.-1 **37 *437 : V tr- \4&2/ Scale 1/4" = 1' - 0" A2.2 Nr \4&2/ Scale 1/4" = 1' - 0" spe)!40-le Jellru lee40!UI 99â‚¬9 136 026 6] OZ99 LE6 OZ6[1] LZ91~9 03 ;leseg glgz xog Â·O~d 'fg el!'~S 'peoÂ¥ slaNhi 081 983%1 3nN3/~IOA~1SV~r 6Â£29 WEL 0Z6 |J] 40 l.0 91Â£ 026 [3] 9â‚¬*Le OO ePbinlle,L 6Zgl x09 -O'd 'lee49 euld 41109 00Â£ r Y - - I .. . ... - 0 0 -EE - . - - in-1--* 2. .'I.*.- -- 0 ... 1. . EE .li.4...1 -- . -- . == ---1.-3---Al~ -e-. . 2 -- . I141;inl I -- I..... ./.I %.1 1 ...IN 0. -- -- == ...illiEiliffs. 1 E- - - -I- --- M~i~-i--~I illm :UL - . =E - = --li~Miligill'llill'llillill .1 EE . EfE EE -1~1.-- -p E 0 -== -- 1/.- = EE -.. E---=* = E-- = e.. e . (a. .2~ === == -= = -I . = = 0........ =.-mill".Il I = -il - . ./ P -- . 0 - -ILII mET/ E === -.. = - - - Ilillillill Mill'mil-lumillf,/ IMI,i1IiI#I'll*flifil,4,~dialill I = 7---* -2.-.. ~ 1 51= - ..... i= - ...... - - - p V Ng'ZE.P.Vi.......1.. E= : I- ar-319 1 -- A A 6//A , -Ii-~1 -I--1/1 e V v -=l J.~W~////I///~~/ 1 0 i I~11. .11.. Ill.12= / ==== . . 00 ~--111.- -Ill'll"111."Ill ~*E--1--1~ --1~1- -..- -I'll'll/1,1./Ill m..~.20 =. ....................I-*...........F.mem..... ............=El.......0..... 1........1...1 ...............Immil......... lili.~1.. 0 0.!lin/////I'ltial/ilill e l ilimil - -1 - .----- E.1-4,1 ,! . = E=i 2 -- -- J~/~25#:0564,-~~~~ 1 ~- E- Â·2 - - --1 = â€žâ€ž//,0//r:,-.-.-.-..,-----6- -~1 0 0 - . 2 EE . 0-1- -4 . --. A - 2 .-2=. . .... EE E .1- 1 - .F .F - 0 E= i.. = / 1,1, - -- - = --5=0~Me)~ILIVAI . I . .. ========. 2 ...... = 1 1 = i===== .. d .. - =- e =------I- 0 -- - E- . . E 2. I......1......- EE == --/1- E-=.--~ ./. EE ESE E.........M == e == e - 0 . M. =E Eff - ~--12.-": - SE li.......'-I....1.....dillill--lillimil..... i/= ./.Imm . - = -am,-1--. ~- --E~:E=ET---I--I-E'X~~-I-~- - 0 --mi- 0 ---Ii-#.Ili-lilil--~1~~'-.i-Il...- --.. 0 -2 0 .. -e-. 4 4 A 2 j 4.17 9 \Â»37 1 V 1 1 1 1 1 1 -7\ 1 1 el I I I / CONCRETE PE~K AT NEK / ROOF SARIDEN ROOF 1 OVER EXIT ~ STAIR I | ENCLOSURE ~ | - L ' - r J 1 C- ,- -1 -2 -2 -1 11 ---1 - -7- .- 1--1 1-y' --Â·- 1 1 SdOPE W 1 /â€¢4"/FT > ~11 . SLOP# j I I I / \ ' 1./40/FIT I I 1 1 1\1 - 11 1 A 1 -let \1 ! 1 1 1 1 N 0. 1 1 c i ~;I i ~'Â· -- - ---- 1 SLOF'L 1 , SLOPE ROOF .P--11.1 .} \ 1/6"/PT 1 1 /4"/FT TO | ~ ~ | C.RICK ET ~ I DRAIN, TYP. CLCPE 2'/Fr 1 1 1 L 3/1 /2A 43:3/'j CA*.2,1 LE~Pr - 4.-- I . -91 -1 - 4- - --- - -1- - - -- Â® . 1 Il-7-,141<~~77Lri~~< .SLOPE Â· -1 1 1 1 J 1/4"/FT. ~ I | CD MECH. CHASE - 1 BELOR ~ ~ =r = = =-i~x L dKY-LIGH- U ~ 1 SUTTER MITH 1 - INTERNAL DRAIN 1 -29 1 MECHANICAL UNITS - , 1 TYPICAL @4- 1 1 1 1 = LOCATIONS li~ A 1 1 METÂ«L ROOF ~ 0 \\\ d3 1 1 0 > LU -1 00 0 I L _ 1- 0 --1 i 0 ILI PROVIDE -/ 81 SNOR CLIPS 0 *& 1 1 xii< -- 1 1 1 1 1 | 6:12 h 1 - 0 / CONCRETE DE~CK AT ROOF GAR#PEN 6 --------------- -- -------- -------t-~7---------- -- ------------------- 0 1 TRANS- a HISTORIC LUCENT T PRESERVATION SKYLIGHT 4 1 1 1 COMMISSION - i __ _- Â® FINAL READING 1 1 01 4 1- 1 1 - V All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property I and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be | ~ ~ used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. 1 1 1 Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled METAL dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the I dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any FlkEPLAGE n attention of the Architect prior to commencement of i FLUE i the work, 1 6:12 ~ "HYPOLON" ~~ --- - ~ / PROJECT NO: 20016 ROOFING BUILT-UP - *12 ~ | ON EXISTING ROOF .1 </4 01 / 1 DRAWN BY: CB STRUCTURE - / Â·METAL ROOF, fÂ« 4 1 TYPICAL CHECKED BY: 1 \ ISSUEDATE: 5/29/01 FILE NAME: 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' ROOF PLAN 1 1 1 1/4,1 = 11 - 0,1 4 . f lit NORT 1 Na-9 * ROOF PLAN H ~ 021 1 Scale 1/4" = 1' - 0" 1 A2.3 i i SPej!.4019 Jetini Iee40!lll 99â‚¬9 236 026 W 0299 236 026 [1] LE@Ly 03 *leses 8:91 x08 -Od 'VE 01!ns 'Peoht Siembl OAAi 982EE 3nN3AV NVWAH 19Â¥3 6â‚¬29 8ZZ 0Z6 0] VOLO BEL 016 [1] 9Â£*1.8 09 ePIÂ·In"el 6291- xoe 'O'd 'leeJ}S eli!d 411109 00Â£ 1 2 4.2 A4.2 9 tem f CURVED METAL STUGGO SIPING ROOF 6 < 1 1 1 1 1 METAL ~ ~ METAL FIREPLACE FLUE FIREF'l.;~~~ ~ | BEYOND ~ METAL ROOFING i --- - - - - / -- 1 / -1- 1 MALL OF ~ 1 ADJACENT BLDe BEYOND | 1 NEK STEE eu kDRAIL I STONE PANEL SIDINe---7 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 . - 4.::99...:94..40.4:.963 1 1 1 l. yÂ·.:41%3:20Â»0%.33 ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lilli 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 In-~ BRICK COMMON MALL -Ill it 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 il 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HYMAN lilli | - CD AMENU& i I i MaLL i 1 1 1 1 ! N.62:1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -IJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LU 1 i lilli 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 00 al__EAST_ELEMATION Scale 1/4" = 1' - 0" 1 2 4.2 4.2 **9*f*f* FUTURE MECH. UNIT MECHANICAL UNIT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STONE Â· ~ 1 PANEL SIDINe 1 1 | | - | KALL OF | ~ ADJACENT ~ BUILDING 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HISTORIC srucco 1 1 1 1 1 PRESERVATION ! COMMISSION - 1 1 1 1 -1 1 FINAL READING 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 All designs, Ideas, arrangements and plans indicated ROOF OF ADJACENT I by these drawings and specifications are the property 1 BUILDING | 3 1 ~ ROOF OF and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work norbe used by any other ADJACENT person for any use whatsoever without written | 1 1 1 1 1 BUILDING permission. I I Written dimensions shall take precedence over scated dimensions and shall be velilied at the job site. Any 1 1 FLOOR OF | REPLACED dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the ADJACENT~BUILPING ~ ~ POOR TO attention of the Architect prior to commencement of BE the work. PROJECT NO: 20016 L srucco -7 1 1 1 1 REPLACED - Â· . Â·Â· r 1 1 1 1 1 . r-- 0-0 ---1 . DRAWN BY: CB 1 1 1 1 FLOOR OF 1 | ADJACENT|BUILDING | 1 1 CHECKED BY: 1 1 | | | ISSUE DATE: 5/29/01 0/fa - -- | NEYV HYMAN | PASSAGERAY AVENUE-MAL FILE NAME: ALLEY lili 1 lili 1 1 NEVY HANPRAIL I PER copE BUILDING ELEVATIONS 1 1 1 1 1 FLOOR OF 1 1 1 t~ Â· ADJACENTÂ·BUILDING 1. 1 1 1 1 I i l i 1/4" = 1' - 0" 1 lilli 1 1 / 2 ril WEST SECTION/ELEVATION M '43:* Scale 1/4" = 1'. 0" MO.re:REPE~ENTAIONOE-&2=l~gENT-26![62!Nal ~ PIAGRAMATIC ONLY i A3.1 pie Jellni lee40!UI )9 216 026 [1] LE918 00 *lese. 8LgE X08 -0-d 'ft 01!ns 'peoll SleA!61 081 982â‚¬Z 3nN3AV I~AH19Â¥3EY 0 WEL 016 W 9â‚¬*le 03 OP!Â·Inlle.L 619 L x08 0'd '10049 euld 41'109 00Â£ 1.I 1% CD Z I.1 D m o LU CO 0 1 2 2 1 *4.1 4-1 FUTURE *4.1 9 STONE (9 MECH. UNITS PANEL SIDING ~ PROPOSED PENTHOUSE SPACE BEYOND METAL STUC O 4 FIREPLACE FLUE | BEYOND METAL ROOF muu BEYOND IFEll 1! /3 NEIN STEEL n 1 XE U //11 REPAINT Â»ID CORNICE SUARDRAIL | ILL_11 PROVIDE NEÂ» CORNICE 1 PIECE TO MATCH DETAIL ON OPPOSITE 0000000000000000 0000 S1PE NER METAL CAP REMOVE PAINT PER 3 %,ME#4Â¥*790:10:6*MDkM;-*~0'020*-4-4:<'9F.Â·3, i@ouu: GUIDELINES REPLACE Â« CORNICE . : 1- .... 1 :....f.-4.. REFURBISH EXISTING 0 0 0 1 --- -- -Â¥ 0- , 69: P.Â·'c"ey MINPORS. RETAIN HISTORIC ORIGINAL GLAZING PRESERVATION REFURBISH KINDOPIS, TYP. COMMISSION - FINAL READING ~-{Â£'4Â· . Â·trÂ°}--"-' 3.- f P.?-rFI~7-3--t--ffLE..Ir:73161; -C. .Â· =a.. q>Â·4 Â·; Â·~ti)?Jt.â‚¬ 2:Â·~1 '~'i, :Â¢- 4/*a/*PPM All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated REPAIR EXISTING by these drawings and specifcations are the property BRICK FACAPE AS and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be ---- ---- ---- REQUIRED used on any other work nor be used by any other PROVIDE NE)4 person for any use whatsoever without written STOREFRONT SYSTEM permission. e Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled | Â·~ ~ dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. An dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of REPLACE/RESTORE the work. INOOP DETAILING p. 0 0 ~.f' STAIR P REFAGE EXIT 111 ./. 11!1 \\\ 111 A/STUCCO. ~~//// 11~1 \\ 111 1 REPLACE k EXISTING PROJECT NO: 20016 NNDOMS m 1 ee 111\ I M / 11 . 0 0 DRAWN BY: CB 111 \ lili ./ Ill I t.%'f NEM MOOP PANELS ~ I [34- -Ill=*=4~U i CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 5/29/01 1 L I 1 FILE NAME: 4 4 /1-1 SOUTH ELEVATION NEM STONE STEP AND LANDING ryj NORTH ELEVATION Scale 1/4" = 1' - 0" BUILDING Scale 1/4" = 1' - 0" ELEVATIONS 1/4" = 1' - 0" i A3.2 L - E spe~40Je Jelini lee4O!ul 99Â£9 216 026 W 0Z99 26 026 [1] LE998 03 Diesel 8:gz xog Â·0Â·d '*Z ewls 'Peobl SieA,bl OAA.L 987â‚¬2 3nN3AV I~AH19Â¥B)EY 6â‚¬19 812 0Â£6 [J] VOLO 8ZZ 026 [1] 9â‚¬*tg 00 apyâ€¢11â€¢1 6191 XO8 Â·OÂ·d ' leeJE auld 411,09 00Â£ ' 2 ) 0 Nzy Nzy IS 9 9 + f gr 3 9 2 .C 0 MECH. _ 1 1 - MECH. 6 UNIT n UNIT 7 0 1 \1 1 1 1 1 1 6/ i i i i -92 I lin I i' 1 i n i 1 1 1 1 3 CO .C 0 .E rAT.o. pu T.O. PLY /~ 121L53/4"~ EXIE 2~ STRUCTURE T.O. PLY /h Â£!It!611 E!81=6 T.O. FU T.O. PLY /h 100'-0 MALL ELEV./'1 ALLEY ------462-10"~ 98'-e 1 1 ~- Scale 1 = 1'.0" BUILDING SECTION /'1 T.O. SLA T.O SLAB /'h r-4-87- h MAX. E 7 1 38'-2 IErl EXIT STAIR NOLOSURE 41/STUCDO 41- SECURITY IR ATH PANIC PAARE E CONCRETE PECK ~ HISTORIC T.O. PLY /'1 -1-5TZ417*r-~57 PRESERVATION ,Â»D COMMISSION - EXISTING R< REBUILP CORNICE FINAL READING STRUCTURE AND PARAPET Ret :%~%Â·~'i>f~ {*IÂ¢ f.Jf I Â·f?t~:4: Â§3 :?fi~Pi<Â·.f. All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be used by any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verined at the job site. Any dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Architect prior to commencement of the work. ~ T.O. PL T.O. PLY 7 113'-1 1-132-1-17-.7 PROJECT NO: 20016 DRAWN BY: CB CHECKED BY: EXhid &11.&21 ISSUE DATE: 5/29/01 FILE NAME: f.Â·03:f.Z' 2.-22:it:5.Et 'f? :.%1*IR*Vt YA- H ASPHALT Â· **r..:,<Â·?3 -3):..4 6.43 4% 1 .11 491: .:54 ?j' 19+1 5:74'j. ~ Â·Â·'t k' E ~ T.O. PL EQUIREP j look ALLEY ELEV. /h BUILDING SECTIONS /i-) BUILDING SECTION 1/4" = 1' - 0' *4.Scale-ii"=-77-0" ~ TO. SL T.O. SLAB /1 Â£ j go- 97 go'- 9. ../ 1 = A4.1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 g ZE6 026 6] 0399 ZE6 0Â£6 [1] JZ968 03 *teses 8193 x09 -O d '*g allns 'Peoy si aA. 0M1- 98zâ‚¬g 3nN3AV NV,yAH 19Â¥3 81 ; 822 0Â£6 DI *0 LO WEL 026 [1] 9Â£*LB 00 ep~nitel 6Egt xog -Od'leeils euld 00Â¥280103 -N3dS 9NlOllAS A380>I 77 li~ !!i~!ijii!!ii!!ii~!iiiiii!iililmiiiiilililiiiiiiiiiiimmwmimmmN.â€ž..., I ..52:.EE:....EE....:; -k . 11.11 11 .11 - .. 111.1=.1-1- MI ~~~~1., ~=~il 1-1~~~-~-1 ~~A~ ..1 ,~1 1 /A=A .rZhâ€¢_.. p ::::#*=:- a f~-dilli'llllilil -----------2----i---I.........Ill'/1/li"'I 1-1- I~ 4,1 .....7 2--+ 1 ~111, ..~1.'P- lillimÂ«r ; 0-9 .~ 1- aril>Â»cliN 277*Â·U; 1-122* 1- 3* -1-9 -1.1~1~01" ..."Im.....1/0......01.'ll,lill................../......ili - Â» .. ..Ill 9>47 30& 93*k . 1 ~11-i.........9409,":SIT-'IIIIIIHI. l ---i---'-4,111'will 11-'Ii'"i...I"I'"I"I"I'r+,Ii'.1.11111111 giÂ»4 1 :1:111.~.~1'll--~~11111'U-~ - -11~,A"11!Ill".~ Â¥ 194 -illillmillilillillillillillillillillillilimilill~ ***r[ ... e c .4 2 11 14> ~~~4:11 O e O 0 000 0 li~ii=&- . e - 2 .. .. .. lil<~12â‚¬/11 .. .El- 0 .. M...............::... 1.-64-1.11 . - -1 - ... Im............ lilli..1 - 1--I 1 ..11'~IMIT~:i:=1=11'll'll"'ll [1,39~ I 1 - 49* 073 . r + ; 416 1% 0 0 >9 1 ELEVATOR 2 1 2 - CURVED METAL ROOF IO 4.1 - VENTILATION 4.1 1 A4.1 F-*39 / 1-0 < ADJACENT BUILDING Â© ~TUCCO A | LOUVRES < ADJACENT BUILDING PROPOSEP VARIANCE HEIGHT ZE- 1 400-8 1/8" ~ FACE NErt 1~.@ M ~ FACE NEIN MAX. ALLOMABLE BLPG HT R U) ENCLOSURE - -- ~ ~----1~â‚¬7Â« ENCLOSURE 'MiLILLLLULLLL1L-LL-LL.iu--i 91-< IN/RECYCLED 1 -2214 ~l/s-rucco . fi ~ ii ~0~EREN]Â·44Â®I-ig*~~E[mm~.- 138 -8" ~ BRICK ~ STONE PANEL - -11'11'~ ~11111111111 1[I[~ 136 -O" ~ -=mctttmn.... '2.:..:,mililil, # ti SPRINe POINT " i I . I ~-37,-- 0~DING IF 1------i< 1/im,W- I i -CURVED STEEL BEAM (4 TOTAL) 9 . 31 M - PENTHOUS~ 5 PROVIDE NEF41 METAL E- 000~ * 1 8,=EL \\ i PER SPECS D REPAIR TOP OF LMATH - . . .. : D ElL]Ele;0 - ~' :1 1 2/3,2/ki PARAPET FNALL AS - c REQUIRED qi p . EXISTING 1 , 111 -11 1 T.O. FUTURE DECK " ROOF j . f - 128'-4" ~ 8 - STRUCTURE N -- * T.O. FLY - -- ITillâ€ž 11-MlÂ·11Â«1 Trilli!11111 t"1-t-1 lilli it ill i tf rti-MÂ·711-i i,ii,iiii,1,1,ti,ii,;,ii,inTn-vr-i-rl-r wi,i,11,0 -1-â€¢ ~6*'C~ EXTENDED N &**00**g----*--~ 127'-4 1/4" ~ FUTURE DECKINe _./.1 ZEE~~*3%0**i*%9-3*3*i**3----'--= Chi.I.C.) 1 J==- /==1 TO ELEV.'d i I I KALL I 9 ME**5%32*EE - E==Â»- fi-i- EXISTING RAFTERS ~_ FUTURE MOOD PECK EXISTINe THROUeH SKYLIGHT 1 4 ROOF i : 3 1 (N.I.C.) STRUCTURE ' - TO REMAIN i : b ,j --7.1'. C" .3.00, ,C-4 Â·Â· *7: b ..Â·Â· '~ 1 j:tg~ i Â·~ ~2 5 - EXISTING MOOP " STRUCTURE TO REMAIN HALL POMPER ENTRY KITCHEN f f # ATH HA-L Â»~ SIT-ING PRESERVATION HISTORIC - , COMMISSION- 11:111rm r 0 + 34 1 1 00 - - - FINAL READING T.O FLY - 113'-11" ~ T.O. PLY ~ 5 4:911 ..< 9,1~41:' 3.: :~:-~~Â·Â·202-:Â·431-4.6-52 ELEV. - 1 1 1-1 1" Â»j:.Â·Â·' 2 t.:LitjtigÂ©id:-'â‚¬*4~Â¥U.w=;51-163,0-'i -. All designs, ideas, arrangements and plans indicated 3 by these drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of the Architect and shall neither be : used on any other work nor be used by any other ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ . ~ ~ . - person for any use whatsoever without written permission, O 4 CAP AND STL FAILING 3-241:PÂ¢CWN:,1-9 ' N.f':0~Â·.:~::4Â·f:Mr<...4*51,FÂ·'I' "t )Â· Â·..21:Â·>~Â·?Â§ 4. 4 f Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any i dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the RETAIL S Â°ACE - attention of the Architect prior to commencement of the work. HALL VESTIBULE _{ RETAIL 0 0 0 - 0 = PROJECT NO: 20016 10.25 ~ - . .... logy; 0 DRAWN BY: CB e | ~ ~ CHECKED BY: ISSUE DATE: 5/29/01 RETAIL SPACE MECHANICAL ' RETAIL FILE NAME: 0 â€¢ : SPACE O 1 0 Yl LULU . 1 . .. . c 90'-9" I *AA#Ziwil: JUAJadÂ·tiv T.O SLAB ~ V I I I V ,, Â· I â€¢ 9 / â€¢ I. I T.O. SLAB 1. .1 .1 . - v . n . . , . 40,-4. 0 BUILDING SECTIONS - - ~ BUILDING SECTION .rj BUILDING SECTION ~4.~ Scale 1/4" = 1' - 0" 1/4" = 1'- 0" ~4.~ Scale 1/4" = 1,-0" 1 1 - spel!40-le Jelin# Iee40!Ul 99â‚¬9 ZE6 OZO] 0Z99 236 OLB [1] LEgle 03 *leses 8 L9g xos .0 d 'tz ellns 'peoy weA!Â¥ OM.L 98ZEE 3nN3AV NVIN 6819 822 0Â£6 [1] DOLO WEL 026 [1] 9Â£*18 00 epunliel 6EgL x09 Â·0Â·d leeJE eu!d 4}nos 00Â£ %0*%*02'*te,1,&1 SNIallne *380>I