HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.625 S West End St.A151-00
~
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL In #
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
. REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
n
A151-00
2737-182-30001
625 S. West End St. Insubstantial PUO Amendment
625 S. West End St.
Fred Jarman/Greg Woods
Insubstantial PUO Amendment
Clarendon Condominium Association C/o Frias Propert
Charles Cunniffe Architects
1/12/01
Approved, Admin Oeci
1/25/01
J. Lindt
1\
A
! , \ \
. \ ~\ [)eCI.s:Io,l
I"i
.....,
1
'!
Notice of Decision
Insubstantial Planned Unit Development Amendment
Clarendon Condominium Association, owner of a property located at 625 S West End St,
Parcel Identification,Number 2737-182-30001, has applied for administrative approval of
an Insubstantial Amendment to the Clarendon Condominium PUD. The Community
Development Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a land use
application for an insubstantial PUD amendment pursuant to Sections 26.445.100 (A) and
26.304 of the Aspen Municipal Code if an application is found to be consistent with the
following review criteria:
1. The proposed amendment to the Clarendon Condominium Planned Unit Development
meets the criteria of Section 26.445.100 (A), PUD Insubstantial Amendments.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION
The Community Development Director finds that the proposed amendment to the
Clarendon Condominium PUD to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby
approves the insubstantial PUD amendment on this 12'h day of January, 2001.
*tA . ~~
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
EXHIBITS
Exhibit A: Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist
Exhibit B: Application
111111I 1111I1111I1111111111111111111111 III 11/1111111111
450847 01/24/2001 12:58P ADMIN DE DAVIS SILVI
1 0' 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
~_......_..~.~..~~.~~.,=",...,=.=.~
1""'1
,
EXHIBIT A
Case No.
Parcel ID No.
Reviewed By
Al5l-00
2737-182-30001
Greg Woods
Zone District R-6 PUD
Date III 1/01
Insubstantial pun Amendment Checklist
26. 445.100 Review Criteria
All insubstantial PUD Amendments shall meet the following criteria, pursuant to Section
26.445.100, Amendment to PUD Development Order:
~ The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development.
Qzi The proposed amendment does not increase by greater than three (3) percent the
overall coverage of structures on the land.
vi The proposed amendment does not substantially increases trip generation rates of
the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities.
of The proposed amendment does not increase the approved open space by greater than
three (3) percent.
M
r:I
~
-J
'J
The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by
greater than one (1) percent,
The proposed amendment does not reduce required pavement widths or rights-of-
way for streets and easements,
The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of
commercial building by greater than two (2) percent,
The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the
development by greater than one (1) percent.
The proposed amendment will not enact a change which is inconsistent with a
condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires
granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements.
1111111111111111I111111111111111111111111I1111111111111
450847 01/24/2001 12:58P ADMIN DE DAVIS SILVI
2 0' 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
..----..--"'--"_..(I_~.J'...~.~ - .~_. ~~""'~.'.'.'~__'~"
- .-.-.- - .-. ...-. - --.- - ,- '.- -- .
~ -_....~.........._. .
r"1 I")
Notice of Decision
Insubstantial Planned Unit Development Amendment
Clarendon Condominium Association, owner of a property located at 625 5 West End 5t,
Parcel Identification.Number 2737-182-30001, has applied for administrative approval of
an Insubstantial Amendment to the Clarendon Condominium PUD. The Community
Development Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a land use
application for an insubstantial PUD amendment pursuant to Sections 26.445.100 (A) and
26.304 of the Aspen Municipal Code if an application is found to be consistent with the
following review criteria:
I. The proposed amendment to the Clarendon Condominium Planned Unit Development
meets the criteria of5ection 26.445.100 (A), PUD Insubstantial Amendments.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENt DIRECTOR DECISION
The Community Development Director finds that the proposed amendment to the
Clarendon Condominium PC TI to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby
approves the insubstantial peD amendment on this 12th day of January, 2001.
*tA. ~"^ , ,
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
EXHIB'ITS
Exhibit A: Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist
Exhibit B: Application
IIIIIIUIIII 1111I1111111 III 1111 1111111111I11111 11111111
45084701/24/2001 12:58P NOTICE DAVIS,SILVI
1 0' 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY:,'
'i_~
_.>..
...... --.11
r'\
'.. .":,~1~:~~~~ik'7'~"
':?-..._-\'... .
(""'..
..""-:.
,. fl
EXHIBIT A
A151-00
2737-182-30001
Greg Woods
Case No.
Parcel ID No.
Reviewed By
Zone Oistrict R-6 POO
Date lIllI01
Insubstantial pun Amendment Checklist
i
i
26. 445.100 Review Criteria
All insubstantial PUD Amendments: shall meet the following criteria. pursuant to Section
26.445.100, Amendment to POO Development Order:
~ The proposed amendment does ,not change the use or character of the development.
Qzi
~
rli
M
r:I
~
.J
'J
The proposed amendment does 'not increase by greater than three (3) percent the
I
overall coverage of structures op the land.
The proposed amendment does 'not substantially increases trip generation rates of
the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities.
The proposed amendment does not increase the approved open space by greater than
three (3) percent.
The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by
,
greater than one (1) percent.
The proposed amendment doe~ not reduce required pavement widths or rights-of-
. way for streets and easements.,
The proposed <!rncndment does :not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of
commercial building by greater than two (2) percent. '
I
The proposed amendment does:not increase the approved residential density of the
development by greater than oile (1) percent.
The proposed amendment will ~ot enact a change which is ,inconsistent with a
condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires
granting a variation from the project' s approved use or dimensional requirements.
11111111111I111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ~IL
450847 01/24/2e~1 12:58P NOTICE DAVIS SILVI
2 01 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
n
(')
LAND USE ApPLICATION
..
PROJECT:
Name: ~~t0 tOU}t-Jt!Qt1€S
Location: ~'2 Z;, <:? ~'l e}JO -:;.,..~
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
ApPUCANT:
Name:
Address:
Phone #:
~{2.~l'J c.a.JC?e> H. (/oJ IOH ~c.-iA:11~
t/(p 'F1<J N? ~1le7 i~o Ei; 0d.~ AVE. / A-5fl;tJ
(
1..0 - ceo t-H II
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name:
t/HA~ C:Ur-JfJlff€' rk~I-rr;cr~ ) GG6~ L..e;f'€R- f~ M.:,tL
~IO e. !-t'(tII1kN Av'aJU5
.q-t~ - '? ~O
Address:
Phone #:
TYPE OF ApPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
0 Conditional Use 0 Conceptual PUD 0 Conceptual Historic Devt.
0 Special Review .~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) 0 Final Historic Development
0 Design Review Appeal 0 Conceptual SPA 0 Minor Historic De't.
0 GMQS Allotment 0 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) 0 Historic Demolition
0 GMQS Exemption 0 Subdivision 0 Historic Designation
0 ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream 0 Subdivision Exemption (includes 0 Small Lodge Conversion!
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion
Mountain View Plane
0 Lot Split 0 Temporary Use 0 Other:
0 Lot Line Adjustment 0 Textflvlap Amendment
EXISTING CONDITlONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
I
~ U~\\ tOW=6 ~~~ WI:'~iA~*:\~ ;::. ~
o 1"'1"'1/ A'f{ W ~ ~A1'1 .U.t?, . t'D.)
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
JI? lJrJ~1" 'f'k;JM?e- f?etJCVAtIOt-l.
:2 ~ UJ I V'PlU
kf ~ TOl.U~ttM€ \JfJtl:
Have you attached the following?
o Pre-Application Conference Summary
0" Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
!i2( Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form
12 Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents
r;;r'Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents
o Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Yom Application
?a;f:IlJ/& To I~e- S\"Z.e oF
EC a ~17 s.. 10 '3::; s.F.
FEES DUE: s-Afu ".!!
-"
..
r,
i"""\
"
ASPEN/PITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and e--v~OON tot-JOoK I tJ 10M ~?(A1l0N
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
l. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for
c.v~Ot'N 1"DWt...ltt"M €'?
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
" APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No, 45 (Series of 1999)
establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent
to a detennination of application completeness,
3, APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter penn it additional costs to be billed to APPLIC.o.NT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional COsls may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidiry and will make additional payments upon noritication by'the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the grearer certainty'
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application,
4, CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to'the Planning Commission and/or City Council m enable the Planning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5, Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount ofS 4-00.~ which is for hours of.Communit), Developm~nt stnff ti:n~. and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
the CITY for the processing o~ the application mentioned above, including post approval re'liew, Such periodic
payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date, APPLICANT further agrees that t'ailure to pay such
accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building penn its be issued until all
costs associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY Of ASPEN
APPLICANT
(lL /1 ,/ -.,.--.,
By: '{..,I(U~
.J',n)le Ann Woods
;~ommunity Development Director
By:
~.
/1--( -II C""
Date:
Mailing Address:
g:\su pport\fo rms\agrpa)'us. d DC
12/2i/99
t+f~ t:0t-JI.J\f\"'"G ~I~-r<;;
~lo G. t+,(M~ !<.Vf3.
k~ I W 5''='1\
.
Af"1'tN', 6€'Of'A<e-( ~(ER.
rJ
("'\
\ j
"
ATTACHMENT 2
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Proj ect:
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
&V~~~ -rroJf.j~e;..
~~I.i ~asMltJlll~ Kf.X/. ~ R:l~~e. (q.fo4c:-
~'2JI? '7. /Ales.,.. ~ 41". ' €'R\~ ')
~-~ ?VI'7
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes, Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable:
Number of residential units:
Number of bedrooms:
Existing: -
Existing: I~
Existing: ~ MA'J'.
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Ie:. 1<a-.t~~
"to ~.6<:I~
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area: E;cisting: Allowable: Proposed: ~
Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: '
Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed:
On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: I
% Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed:
(l> % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed:
Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: ~
Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: ~
Combined FIR: Existing: Required: Proposed:
Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed:
Side Setback: E;r:isting: Required: Proposed: ~
Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed:
Existing non-conformities or encroachments: -
Variations requested: "\fJ'=N~~A\.... AH.-EN~ Tz> ~"eo eu.t', II
(ItJ~~ <:.l~~ fl!eIlMVo{ ~"eo '2~fl.ll61Z. ~ wl~
~a:;nb~t\,eAct-\ lit-Hi. ~~r~'To m~~.)
1'\
A
Ms, Julie Ann Woods, Community Oevelopment Oirector
City of Aspen
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Clarendon Townhomes "Insubstantial Amendment to Approved P,U.O," Application
Oear Ms, Woods,
I hereby authorize Geoffrey Lester of Charles Cunniffe Architects to act as the representative with
respect to the P,U,O, Amendment request submitted to your office for the property;-referred to as the
Clarendon Townhomes. Geoffrey Lester is authorized to submit this application and be the
representative in any related meetings or hearings,
Should you have any need to contact me during the course of your review of this application, please do
so through Geoffrey Lester, whose address and telephone number are included in the application
package.
s;"~
Chuck Frias, Property Manager / Agent
Frias Properties
730 E, Ourant
Aspen, CO 81611
1"'\
~
Clarendon Townhomes Owners List
Property Manager I Representative:
Chuck Frias
Frias Properties
730 E. Ourant
Aspen, CO 81611
Townhome Owners:
Unit 1: John and Bridget Simunovich
Unit 2: Joe Herbst
Unit 3: Or, Oonald Kolmer
Unit 4: Gerson and Barbara Bakar
Unit 5: Julie and Oominic Silvester
Unit 6: Bob and Patty Schneider
Unit 7: Ann Bowers
Unit 8: Lee and Gertrude Gladstone
Unit 9: Monte and Peggy Smith
Unit 10: Jim and Linda Shirk
Unit 11: Jerry and Oebbie Epstein
Unit 12: Earl and Marilynn Latterman
Unit 13: Oaniel Honig
Unit 14: Richard Weinberg
Unit 15: Rosamond Stanton
I
I
r,
~
N
.-
,
~
;'
"
(
<G \ T€- f'L-f\N
I" -= ~I_~"
~
eX\'7Tit-lb ~Q:>~
TOOJtJ/b.1e? ('SSe
6tJ~ <;Ire; fl.#l)
I Z
'3 4- S
G
-, 8 .,
10
1/
--~
"
\
.
12. 13 it '" l
I
I
--J
II'
.
,
I
,
L--
~ L-llJe
V\vl~l1'1
MAt'
"'1lIwr~,--
Downtown
Aspen
~.
Sc.hJinmila
~!
~i
!f '
il12
- ,~ ,
1/4
"- .:; \"\6- (~allA~e,.rr !>evVtE-)
f"'\
C";
Existing West Section
Existing Middle Section
1""\
1""\.
'. ....~"'- -~ ~,,':--<."~:>;-.~:..'~,~';~~:'. ~'-';~.....~:~;';:"~\i?
'~-"""'?-- '~. .<f(':'~~~'H~'_""~' ... . ._..~, ' .
'~~~~~::-'-- ... "--
",.. .'-.........~' ...-.- J~'.
- .... -".
'.~ ' -'
~.",<,;.~~ . ':':'---6J:'\.
........ .-
.--....
~.
.........
Existing East Section
Middle Section Close Up
I"",
~
:~1~~~~?:;,*l;'::;~;::~:;:,~~~j-",~:.1J,::
"," ,
". ;..:'~ ',. .~:'- . ;':;;.:;~:':~~'~?2::.S ~~:{::',i~;~~~:t'~::~~:,~i~T~~~~:;
-,.."
~':;',;';:':
. ':;:.~: 0.1.
;":".~
.':." .
',~f~,~f,i;t~'.;:~~(;,:~;:>:0::t.
-</..,-
Facelift Character Study
OCT.17.2000 11:06AM
CO~,GRAYBEAL YAW
NO. 348
P.3/8
. ,
,,~ , ..
,:- #34059401/16/92 t1:07 R $25.00 BK 666 ~e 979
Silvia Davi$, Pitkin Cnty Cl~rk, Ooc ~.OO
",
~E:D ANI) RESTA!I!B])
P.U.D. AGRK~
l.2B
Tn CLARm1DO:Y COlllXlH!1allQ
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED P.tI.D. AGREEMENT for The Clarendon
CondoIlliniums is made and entered into as of the /st day of
September, 1991, 'by and between The Clarendon condominiUlll
Association, Inc., a. Colorado non-profit corporation (the
"Association") and the City of Aspen, Colorado, a ~unicipal
corporation (the "city")'.
WIT N E SSE T H
WHEREAS, the Association' is the attorney-in-fact and managing
agent for The Clarendon CondominiUllls pursuant ,to ArtiCles IV and V
of the condominimn Declaration for The Clarendon Condominiums
recorded in Book 319 at Page 415, et seq.. of the records of the
Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder; and,'
WHEREAS; the Association has processed and received approval
from the city for amendments to the P.tI.D. for The Clarendon
COndominiums as specifically set forth and contained' in
Ordinance No. 28 (Series of 1991) (Fourth Amendment to, the
Clarendon P. U . D.) and the Insubstantial Amendment thereto approved.
by the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Department as of September 11,1991
(Fifth Amendment to the Clarendon p.tI.n.) (both amendments are'
collectively, hereinafter referred to as the "Approval");' and
WHEREAS, as a 'condition of the Approval, 'the Association, on
behalf of The Clarendon CondominiUllls, has agreed to enter into this
Agreement to memorialize and formalize the assurances given to the
City in connection with the Approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration'of the premises, the mutual
covenants herein contained, and the approval, execution and
acceptance of the Mended Final P.tI.D. Plat of The Clarendon
Condominiums by the City for recording, the parties hereby agree as
follows:
1. The Mendment to the Finai P.tI.D. Plan is limited
to:
'a. One additional bedroom to each two-bedroom unit
at 245 square feet each;,
b. A master bedroom expansion to each unit at
170 square feet each;
,.
sfs\clarende.Agt
Receivea Time Oct,17, 11:i2:\M
bCT.17.2000 11:06AM
con'- GRAYBEAL YAW
""'"
t.,J
NO. 348
P.4/8
. ,
~~ '.
,
~340594 01/16/92 11:07 !e $25.00 BK
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, 'Doc:
666 PG sao
$.00
c. A livinqroom expansion to each unit at
no square feet each;
2Iri~. ~S ., d. Bay window projections to each unit at
25 square feet each;
,,/" e.
~anded
f.
A total of not more than 32,897 square feet ~
square footage for the entire parcel;
The addition of one on-site parkinq space.
2. The number of .bedroOlllS approved is forty-live (45)
ahd that n1.Utll:ler shall not be increased without the. prior
written approval of the City.
3. The Association shall provide and maintain:
a. One more on-site parkinq space for,a t~tal of
thirty (30) spaces;
. b. An on-call shuttle service for owners and
gues'ts as an autO-disincentive, providing transportation
from The Clarendon Condominiums to and from anywhere
within the city liInits anc1 the Aspen Airport at Sardy
Field;
c. A parkinq pass system for non-rental unit
owners allowing- a maximum of one car per unit and one
extra pass per unit for use by. guests on a short-term
!:lasis only.
4. . The Association shall demonstrate to the Engineering
Department that any increased run-of! attributable to the new
construction and development in accordance with the Amended
Final P.U.D. is adequately mqintained on site by providing to
the City calculations from an. engineer registered in the State.
9f ColoradO with comments on tb,e functional aspects' of the
facility in order to detennine that it can be cleaned for
continual, proper performance,
5. In the. event of any development wit:ilin public
rights-of-way the Association shall first consult with City
Engineering for design considerations and shall obtain
permits, including any necessary encroachment licences, for
any work or development within public rights-of-way from the
City Engineer.
6. Notwithstandinq the. requirements of Section 24-7-906
of the Municipal Code and Section 2 of Ordinance No. 22,
Series of 1991, the parties agree that the Association Shall
not be required to' record a final PUD plat or final
development plan wi thin one hundred-eit,jhty days of approval by
sfs\clarende.agt
2
Received Tillie Od.ii. 11:12;M
DCT.17.2000 11:06AM
COTT~,GRAYBEAL YAW
(')
NO. 348
P.5/8
, '
#~40~~4 01/16/92 11:07~' $25.00 BK ~66 ?G 881
Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnt, Clerk, Doc $.00
the City, but in lieu thereof the Association shall have a
continuing obligation to record an i1lIlended condominiUlll map to
'ref],ect any and all improvements made pursuant to the Approval
prior to the issuance ot a final letter of completion by the
Aspen/Pitkin Building Oepartment for any such improvements.
7. The Association specifically acknowledges its
understanding that the Approval .is, conditioned upon the
representations that the number of bedrooms will no~ exceed
forty-five (45) and that the shuttle service and parking- pass
system hereinabove referred to will be maintained.' In the
event that the, City determines that the Association or any
~it owner has failed to adhere to such 'representations, the
city shall serve written notice of noncompliance upon the
Association with a demand that compliance :be made within
thirty (30) days of the receipt of such notice. In the event
of failure to fully comply within said thirty-day period, in
addition to and not in limitation of any other rights or
remedies which the City may have, the city shall have the
right to compel compliance :by filing a suit for a mandatory .
injunction with the Pitkin County District Court.
8: . It is specifically understood and agreed by and
:between the city and the Associatio~,.tl1at-~~otal allowable
f~oor area for the entire parcel ~s 3g'47~~~are feet.
~.,,-,.._.- ' .
9. The Covenants and Agreements of the Assoc~ation
herein shall be deemed covenants that run with the land, shall
burden the land included within the Amended Final P.U.D. Plat,
and sba,ll bind and be specifically enforceable against all
present and subsequent owners thereof, including, the
Association, its successors in interest and,assigns.
10. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties
hereto the' city agrees that it will approve and execute any
amended condominium maps for The Clarendon Condominiums which
depict improvements made pursuant to the Approval and accept
the same for recording in the real property records of Pitkin
County, COlorado, upon payment of recording fees and costs by
the Association.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed on the year and
date first hereinabove set forth.
THE CLARENDON CONDoMINIUM ASSOCIATION
By:
~~~:. ~j~'
President --
-,
.'
sfs\clarende.agt
3
Received Timo'Ocl,i7, il:i2AM
"OCT. 17.2000 11: 06AM
COTTI~GRAYBEAL YAW
K}
()
NO. 348
P.6/8
#340594 01/16/92 11:07 ' $2S.00 SK 666 ~G 882
Silvia Davis, ~ii:kin C. I Clerk, OQC: $.00
STATE OF C~tl&
COUNTY OF f++~
)
) S5.
)
The foregoing AMENDED AND RESTATED P.U.D. A~~R Tm:
NDON CONDOMINIUMS was aeknQwledqed ~fore me this' y of
, 1991 by ,../ Ltfftf?rM I
esiden of the Clarendon Condominium Association.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary expires:
a.5' q:2..
~;/;{;t: cJ Pkt~
ary Public //
A~
Se et ry "
. : L. It "
,"" ........: .'i'. '.
~. ," \'. \ '. '\'. ,~~~
- .' t \' .. '.'0.) ';;
',: lot ~ ~"',1r,!" : ...... 7:
. -, .
-:;.-:-~- . ;:
. ~ . ~
" . l/r>\ ,(': ,
. .... lJ I:'" --......l) g
. . ,......::' .~..~
':";":". .-,.....,....~
..'
........'
STATE OF t~tJ.,t2'6
COuNTY OF fJ/f~
)
)55.
)
The foregoing AMENDED AND RESTATED P.U.D. AGREEMENT FOR THE
NDON CONDOMINIUMS was aCknowledge~befor'le thi's !..f2:!:!:-.day of
, U91 by f'::h/J". ('/J11t1J1'1 -f-
creta of the Clarendon Condominium Association.
,
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary ,expires:
;;;? 5' - 9e2
~j;J~~ lZ~
Nt' Public .
"
,'0' ""
. '- .. '.,
/'~)'>. ...~.~.,...:.<..,>~
, :" \ "jfl.J ." '.
.. ...., ,,~ ..
t : --0-0-<-- : ~
~"':"'-(!tloun'\\ /...
- 1>"..>". fJ. V',J..\J . ~
':\ \...,...~r.oiS?:;.:.', ..... """
... ~. v.s~;.....1 .... ....
'. :.,,::,...;, v-
":'. .
THE CITY OF ASPEN
By:
0).
Mayot
f, t?.;. ..::;4 -
~,2 Jd hilA,
'city Cl :K
"
sfs\cl~rendel~9t
4
Received Time Oct.17. 11:12AM
'QCT.17.2000 11:07AM
COTT\~fRAYBEAL YAW
I)
NO. 348
LB'r'rER FOR TlIE i'Zt.l!l: JU'D'ARY 25, 1992
P.7/8
The'purpose of this letter is to clarify the Amended and Restated
PUn Aaraemant for, TheC1.arendon Condominiums. '
Page 2, 1. (e) states that "a total of not more than 32,897 square
feet of expanded square footage for the entire parcel;" and
Page 3, number 8 states that "It is specifically understood and
agreed by and between the City and the Association that the total
allowable ;floor area for the entire parcel is '38, 270 squa~ feet."
The difference in the two nUlllbers is the total square footage of
a Parcel may be greater than the total floor' area due t;'o the
procedure used for calculating floor area. Thus, floor area is
less than total square footage~' ' ,
The Clarendon Amendment of 1~91 granted additional square footage
for expansion potentia~ for the 15 free market units. Not all of
the additional square footage is considered floor area. Therefore
when the final calculations were derived at based upon, the
underlying zone district, POD overlay, allowable floor area is less
than total square footage.
Additionally the final numbers do ,consider the office and emplqyee
unit that exists on site but was not a part of this 1991 POD
amendlnent. <~../ . ,
: , '- I
(\~{ ~l,--"~^(( Iltl.~'::i,d
,- '\ '\"f-:~ . ,....I;,J.::-.:,.
1 II..'~..... .,' -.,;~'
\-.,...::~~LCC....... ~ ' l~. '; \j - '""-- ",.__
....
. "
Received Time Oct,17, 1::12,l,,~
I ,
! /~'I /- /CI '\
/ .:x -:::;1 i.."z
,~ It
~';:';,,?'.11J',"'''',,",'
"',
-..,,,,~
("""4
.~
~.
~~
MEMORANDUM
CHARLES CUNNIFFEARCHITECTS
610 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, CO 81611
970/925-5590
970/920-4557 FAX
ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING
INTERIORS
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT:
City of Aspen / Julie Ann Woods, Oirector
Geoffrey Lester
Oecember 7, 2000
Clarendon Townhomes
625 S, West End Street, Aspen, Colorado
9946
Insubstantial Amendment to Approved P.U.O. Application
JOB NO,:
REGARDING:
On behalf of our client, we are submitting an application for an Insubstantial Amendment to an
Approved P.U,O, for your review and consideration, Please find attached in 8 1/2 x 11 format the Land
Use Application, Agreement with fee, Oimensional Requirements Form, Representative Authorization
Letter, Unit Owners List and Vicinity Map along with existing building and proposed model photographs,
In addition, in 11 x17 format we include the Site Plan and Existing & Proposed Facade Elevation
drawings. We also attached a copy of the 1991 Amended and Restated P,U.D, Agreement for
reference,
Project Historv:
Since the original design and construction of what is now called the "Clarendon Townhomes" project in
the 1970's, this project has been through several modifications, In 1991, an Amended and Restated
P,U.O, Agreement was granted allowing each of the 15 units to expand in several prescribed directions,
Throughout recent years, each unit' owner has individually opted to take advantage of the allowed
square footage increases selecting some or all of the options to be constructed. These options
included bedroom, master bedroom, living room and bay window expansions, (Refer to Items 1 a - 1 d,)
Current Proposal:
The Owners approached us with the idea of designing an entry side "facelift" to provide enhanced unit
individuality, scale and character, We feel by the addition of overframed gables, entry canopies and
facade material upgrades, we have accomplished the desired individual unit identity and improved
aesthetic character. In several cases, Owners have chosen to use this opportunity to finally construct
the previously approved bay window at their second floor bedroom,
Request for the Insubstantial Amendment:
The added gables, canopies and facade material improvements are inconsequential from a project
square footage point of view, However, to allow for a continuous backing form for the new entry
canopy feature, we would like to modestly extend the width for both the new and existing 2nd floor
bedroom projections (or "bay windows") to cover the entire entry recess, As shown in the existing
facade elevations and photographs, the current 2nd floor projections awkwardly stop about 2 feet short
of covering the entry recess,
The previously approved square footage for these projections is 25 sJ. per unit. (Item 1d,) To
accomplish extending the width of each projection to suit the new design, we require a square footage
increase of 7 to 8 s,f. Therefore, we request the allowable size of each projection to be increased from
25 sJ. to 33 sJ, per unit.
__._f.
',,,-
We feel that up to an ~itional 8 square feet per unit for this~i~gle feature still works well within the
square footage guidelines for the project based on the following tabulation:
Total Allowable Project Size:
Oetached Manager's Bldg,
32,897 s,f. (smaller of the two numbers mentioned in the P,U,O.)
1,415 sJ,
Total Allowable left for Townhomes: 31,482 s,f,
Oivided by 15 residential units: 2,099 sJ, average maximum allowable size for each unit
Original Unit Size (approx.):
Approved expansion options:
Ultimate Unit Size (approx,):
1,391 s,f.
610 sJ, (total of 4 options)
2,001 sJ,
As shown above, the ultimate unit size of 2,001 s,f, after all expansion options are built is 98 sJ. less
than the maximum allowable square foot average per unit. Clearly, the additional 8 sJ. requested per
unit will still allow each unit size to fall at least 90 s,f, below the maximum square footage number,
With consideration to the project's significant design improvements, we hope you will deem this very
minor square foot adjustment "insubstantial" with regard to the previously amended P.U.O,
Feel free to give me a call if you have any questions or comments,
Thank You,
('>.,
I")
I FLOOR PROJECTION OPTION
SEE
~EV ATlONS
P/JRKING
'\
\
J
" I ' '
, ',\'
, ,
I
\
,\
5
4
3
2
8
7
6
I '
"~~\",,
, ,
,I,XI ' .
..,....:@........
""'~~' .
.....s
...~,.
~,,"'f''.fp'"
.\1...-';', .
;:::;;:f, =-.
1T\u1!;.
o
/
SITE PLAN
"
/
/
/
/
, /
I
\
, \ "
\
I
\
I
I
I" = 20'-0"
f"'"\.
,I"')
,.
--,
CURRENT 2nd FLOOR PROJECTION
SIZE and LOCATIONS
(Units 1- 5 and /1)
]0 I I
JOprn
UNIT 8
00 DO
00 00
MIDDLE SECTION
UNff 5
UNrr 4
UNIT J
UNff 2
UNIT I
WEST SECTION
EXISTING
PROPOSED 2nd FLOOR PROJECTION
SIZE and LOCATIONS
(Units 1- 5 and II to be expanded.
Units 6.9, /0.12 - 15 to be added)
MIDDLE SECTION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,(
I
UNIT 5
UNff 4
UNIT J
UNn' 2
UNIT I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
WEST SECTION
PROPOSED
REFER TO ENLARGED ELEVATION NEXT SHEET
OVERALL ELEVATIONS
I" = 20'-0"
~
~
, "
CURRENT 2nd FLOOR PROJECTION
SIZE and LOCATIONS
DDD
DO
DO
WEST SECTION EXISTING
I" e 10'-(]'
PROPOSED 2nd FLOOR PROJECTION
SIZE and LOCATIONS
(Units 1- 5 to be expanded.
Unit 6 to be added)
EXTENSION AT EXISTING
PROJECTIONS
ENTRY CANOPY
UNIT J
UNff 2
UNIT /
WEST SECTION PROPOSED
I" e 10'-(],