The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1475 Sierra Vista Dr.0058.2015.ASLU1 1 THE CITY OF ASPEN[ City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0058. 2015.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 11 1 05 006 PROJECT ADDRESS 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR PLANNER JEN PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE REPRESENTATIVE ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 07/10/2015 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 12/13/2015 2735-1 \-1 -01- eC)(2, DOSS Â· 24 F Â· AS>U,1 file Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Report Format Iab Mel p i @ J ix , e 4 <4 1 i Qj *, 3 M diÂ· @,11 1 9 4 13 11 & lump l ~'4 ~:4)'60 Ii@ e @ 2 31 J .'il 2 34 a .1.4 =0 1 i~ _@In~ Custom Fields IRogting Status 1 Fee Summary Actions 'Routing Bistory I Permit type IM . ||Aspen Land Use ~ Permit # |0068.2015.ASLU Address |1475 SIERRAVISTA DR AWSuite / Â·616 City ASPEN State ~EE-] Zip ~81611 11 4 -iÂ®E;;1*....1.2,4 4/1 'g.%,1. 1* 1 11 ' Permit Information --t -:'-9 I -9 -Ir Master permit ~ Routing queue aslu 15 Appljed |06/24/2015 1 F, 3 f 1 projedl Status Ipending Approved | | Description APPLICATION FORADMISTRATIVE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE Issued | Closed/Final | 5 Submitted ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC ~ Clock ~ning~ Days ~-61 Expires 06/18/2016 i. 1 - Submmed via | || Owner Last name |HODGES First name |ALLEN 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR I i ASPEN CO 81611 phone |(817) 8774646 Address , 1 Applicant U Owner is applicant? U Contractor is applicant? 0 9. ~ Last name ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS First name ~ ~ Phone ~0 1 - Cust # ~26269 Address Email * Lender ~ Last name First name ~ Phone k ) Address 1=13 1 29*EL.. "A i lk'11,15 c r'I, pl) 'angelas ~I 1 011+- . _ :i . 1/ .....'ll....)//fl Â«*MAI Â¥*% v D 6Â£* 371 0 74</9 -M: 3â‚¬ -72-3 9 24-) 15- 4 69Â·00 k ica \ 4- P lot AÂ»f- : A M t 03-Â»1.4 4 Ar (chaie-- d k 12-Le I -2-0 Al- ~ seloN >10!nci || X04106 [" sdnoid 1 f,tai!*a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1476 Stern:k U.(96, D-Â¥~u.4 Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, .,A-V~eL Â©c-cM-~ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the city of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4 Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an o fficial paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after z an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. c,~1Â«-2â€¢~L Ec- &-w--~ Signaturl Thtfgpgoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this [G day of B324 , 204_le, by >4~AhfAA '56.c~-n PUBLIC NOTICE - Of 4 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL WITNESS MY- HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title I 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- My unreassionexputs. S Ill 1 0-0/9 ing to the following described property: Lot 33, West Aspen Subdivision, Filing 1, and more com- monly known as 1475 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, CO 81611. The Applicant received a Residential FAVUÂ»tA#I Design Standard Variance to maintain the existing garage location from the Planning & Zoning Com- mission on July 7, 2015. A second Residential De- Notary Public sign Standard Variance was granted administra- , tively to maintain the structure's orientation. For further information contact Jennifer Phelan, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado, (970) 429-2759. NICOLE ELIZABETH HENNING s/ City of Aspen ATTACHMENTS: NOTARY PUBLIC Â· STATE OF COLORADO Published in The Aspen Times Weekly on July 16, 2015,(11360801) Notary Identification #20154012950 My Commission Expires 3/31/2019 COPY OF THE PUBLICATION DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City ofAspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Mr. & Mrs. Allen Hodges. 306 W. 701 Street #701, Fort Worth, TX 76102 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address 1475 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, Colorado. Legally described as Lot 33. West Aspen Subdivision, Filing 1. Parcel ID # 2735-111-05-006 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property P&Z granted a Residential Design Standard Variance to maintain the existing garage door location and an administrative approval was granted from a Residential Design Standard Variance to maintain the existing structure's orientation. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Planning and Zoning Commission approval for garage location was granted on July 7. 2015 through Resolution # 13. Series of 2015. Administrative approval for structure orientation was granted July 10, 2015. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) July 16,2015 - Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) July 17,2018 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) IsBwd th<s 10th day of July, 2015, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. lott 'unris i,t~yon, Community Developmentd)jector Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission Julv 7, 2015 Ryan Walterscheid, Chair, called the Planning & Zoning Commission (P&Z) meeting to order at 4:30 PM with members Kelly McNicholas, Jasmine Tygre, Brian McNellis and Ryan Walterscheid. Also present from City staff; Debbie Quinn, Jennifer Phelan and Sarah Rosenberg. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS There were no comments. STAFF COMMENTS: There were no comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments. MINUTES Ms. Tygre moved to approve the minutes for June 30th, seconded by Ms. McNicholas. All in favor, motion passed. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST There were no conflicts expressed. 710 & 720 E Durant Ave (Durant Mall) - Commercial Design Review - Continued Public Hearing from June 16th Mr. Walterscheid opened the continued public hearing from June 16th. Ms. Phelan stated the applicant requested a continuance for July 21M Ms. Tygre motioned to continue the public hearing to July 21, 2015, seconded by Ms. McNicholas. All in favor, motion passed. Mr. Walterscheid closed the continued public hearing. 1475 Sierra Vista Drive - Residential Design Standards Variance -Public Hearing Mr. Walterscheid asked if public notice had been provided. Ms. Quinn replied she has reviewed two affidavits showing notice was published and mailed. Mr. Walterscheid then opened the public hearing. Mr. Walterscheid turned the floor over to the Staff. 1 Regular Meeting Planning & Zonine Commission Julv 7, 2015 Ms. Sarah Rosenberg, Community Development Special Project Planner, reviewed the application. The applicant is requesting a residential design variance. The house was built in 1968 on a 16,001 sf lot at the end of a cul-de-sac. The current owners purchased the property in 2013 anticipating remodeling the structure. An initial residential design variance was submitted to increase the nonconforming nature of the garage but it was withdrawn when it was determined it would need to go before a board instead of being administratively approved. Since then the applicant has applied for a building permit which would exceed the demolition allowances of more than 40% of the exterior walls and roof structure. Because of this event, the existing nonconformity must be brought into compliance. The applicant initially requested three variances but two have been resolved leaving the variance forthe existing footprint and location of the garage. Ms. Phelan stated regarding the street facing garage and access from a public street, the standard requires the front fa,ade to be ten feet back from the face of the house. The current front fagade of the garage is forward of the front house fagade. Ms. Rosenberg reviewed the neighborhood context. Most of the structures in the neighborhood were developed prior to the existing design standards making most of them nonconforming. The applicant studied 25 of the structures and 14 do not meet the design standards related to the fagade of the street facing garage including the subject property. She then showed a slide (p 78) identifying the houses in the neighborhood with nonconforming garage orientations. Ms. Rosenberg then showed a slide depicting the existing and proposed site plans. There are two design standards the applicant needs to meet. One is a side loading garage or the front fagade and the other is to set back the front fagade of the garage at least 10 ft behind the front most wall of the house. The existing garage orientation does not meet either of these standards. Ms. Rosenberg stated there are two criteria for granting a variance of the residential design standards and only one of them needs to be met for a variance to be granted. 1. Does the request provide an appropriate pattern of design based on the context of the surrounding neighborhood and the purpose of the particular standard? 2. Is the request clearly necessary for the reason of fairness due to unusual site-specific constraints? The applicant has proposed to maintain the garage to be street facing to limit the construction costs by maintaining the existing foundation and some of the walls. They also stated the cone shaped lot produces hardship making it difficult for a side loading garage. Staff does not feel the shape of the lot is not a significant detriment to redevelopment. Staff finds the request does not meet the variance review standards and recommend the application be denied. 2 Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission Julv 7,2015 Mr. Walterscheid asked if there were any questions of Staff. Ms. McNicholas asked how many of the nonconforming houses were a result of approved variances. Ms. Phelan stated they did not conduct research to make that determination. She added there are older houses in the neighborhood and there is other redevelopment occurring including some with similar situations. Ms. McNicholas asked if Staff worked with the applicant to provide an alternate approach. Ms. Phelan stated the biggest issue is the location of the foundation and the cost savings to the applicant to keep the foundation in place to prevent a redesign of the house. Mr. Walterscheid turned the floor over to the applicant. Mr. Dylan Johns, Zone 4 Architects, represents the applicant along with Mr. Bill Pollock. Mr. Johns stated they submitted an administrative variance request last year to move the front of the garage forward to accommodate a larger car. The applicant decided not to pursue this and instead move forward with maintaining the existing facades. Regarding the two criteria to be used for the variance request, he feels they fit into both criteria. Their research indicated a majority of the houses in the neighborhood have this style of development. The garage placement of the houses follow a traditional ranch style house with an attached garage. It is also his understanding this neighborhood is the reason for introducing administrative variances were included in the residential design standards in 2005 because there were numerous requests. This residence is about 90 ft away from the edge of the pavement and is heavily screened by trees. The house itself is roughly 2,760 sf. He pointed out on a slide the close proximity of the house to the setback lines. The pie shaped lot with the narrow edge approaching the street makes a big difference when trying to maneuver cars on the property. He feels the streetscape follows the intention of the code rather than the literal definition of the code. He feels the owner is attempting to fix the design around the existing foundation with a small addition utilizing available floor area ration (FAR) for the property. He feels there is no easy way to get cars into the lot. He showed pictures of the house from three positions of the front of the house. He also showed pictures taken by Staff and pointed out their pictures were taken while off the street and theirs was not. He noted while the form of the proposed house is different, the existing house and proposed house are the same mass. He feels strict compliance with the code will change the streetscape. He noted there is a provision within the International Building Code which applies to existing buildings which allows the building officials to exempt certain code standards if there is a financial hardship to the property owner. He doesn't feel the residential design standards were meant to be a punitive measure for an owner. He feels there are site constraints to be considered. He then showed a site plan with a side loading option depicted. This option is not possible without removing many mature trees and would put the project up against other design variances. Mr. Walterscheid asked if there were any questions of the applicant. 3 Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission Julv 7, 2015 Mr. McNellis asked if the garage was included in the 40% demolition figure at which Mr. Johns stated it was not along with the wall including the front door. He reiterated the applicant is not trying to introduce more nonconformities and maintain the existing structure. Ms. McNicholas asked Staff if financial hardship may be considered. Ms. Phelan does not believe financial hardship should be considered and reiterated the two criteria previously discussed to allow for a variance. She also stated P&Z only needs to identify one of the criteria as applicable to grant a variance. She suggested focusing on the neighborhood context because there are examples of nonconformity. Ms. McNicholas asked how Staff would argue this is an unusual site constraint. Ms. Phelan stated compared to the other lots, this one is more constrained due to its shape. She stated the 40% demolition rate is more technical. If this was really a scrape to ground demolition, the new structure could be reoriented on the lot. Mr. Walterscheid asked for public comment. No member of the public was present. Ms. Phelan stated there was one letter from the owner of 1465 Sierra Vista Drive which is next door the applicant's property. The owner stated in the letter he has no objections to the applicant's proposal. Mr. Walterscheid then closed the public comment portion of the hearing. Mr. Walterscheid opened for discussion with the commissioners. Ms. Tygre stated she toured neighborhood and noted the area does not get a lot of pedestrian traffic and there is a lot of mature vegetation. She didn't see much of the home from the street. She does not feel the pedestrian experience is relevant and noted a variety of garage orientations. She agrees with Staff's position when a certain amount of demolition triggers a review and doesn't believe a financial hardship should be considered. She likes the idea of a modest remodel of the existing structure not exceeding the FAR and wants to approve the request. She feels there are other properties in the area that will be redeveloped and if the variance is granted on the grounds of neighborhood context, she is concerned the decision will be used as basis for other decisions. She wants to approve the variance based on site constraint of the cone shaped lot. Mr. McNellis is inclined to approve based on neighborhood context. He agrees with Ms. Tygre regarding the mature vegetation and agrees you cannot see the garage element from the street. He adds some weight that they are maintaining the original structure. He also feels there is a site constraint. He counted at least five other houses where the garage if oriented forward but probably 10 ft forward of the front fa,ade of the house. Mr. Walterscheid stated he is in support of the applicant as well because the proposed redevelopment will remain in the same form on the pad. He would approve based on both the neighborhood context criteria and the site constraint criteria. He noted other remodeled homes with the same front facing garages. 4 Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission Julv 7, 2015 Ms. McNicholas stated she preferred to approve a variance based on site constraint given the orientation of the house. She shares Ms. Tygre's concerns regarding approving the variance based on neighborhood context. Ms. Phelan suggested changing the last paragraph of Section 1 in the draft resolution to reflect the site constraint of the cone shaped lot instead of the neighborhood context as the reason for granting the variance. Mr. McNellis asked if the resolution should include both criteria or just one. Ms. Tygre stated she only wants to grant it based the site constraint. Ms. McNicholas feels the site constraint criteria honors the code. Ms. Tygre motioned to approve Resolution 13, Series 2015 with a modification to the last paragraph under Section 1 to state the design considers the site constraint of the cone shaped lot instead of the context of the neighborhood. The motion was seconded by Ms. McNicholas. Mr. Walterscheid asked for a roll call: Mr. McNellis, yes; Ms. McNicholas, yes, Ms. Tygre, yes; Mr. Walterscheid, yes. The motion passed with a four to zero (4-0) vote. Mr. Walterscheid then closed the public hearing. Mr. Walterscheid then adjourned the meeting. Cindy Klob City Clerk's Office, Records Manager 5 NOTICE OF APPROVAL For a Residential Design Standard Variance involving the property at 1475 Sierra Vista Drive, legally described as Lot 33, West Aspen Subdivision, Filing 1. Parcel ID Number: 2735-111-05-006 APPLICANT: Allen and Janet Hodges 306 W. 7th St. #701 Fort Worth, TX 76102 SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive Aspen, CO 81611 SUMMARY: The Applicant requests the Planning Staff approve a variance from the Residential Design Standards to maintain the existing orientation of the house. Three variances were initially requested: building orientation, location of garage, and the design of the front porch. On July 7, 2015, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted a variance to maintain the garage location for Standard 26.410.020.D due to site-specific constraints. The orientation request is being reviewed administratively and the front porch is being redesigned to meet the design standard. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located off of Cemetery Lane, outside of the designated Aspen Infill Area, on Sierra Vista Drive at the end of the cul-de-sac. The lot was improved in 1968 with a single family home, which still exists today. The parcel is located in the R-15 zone district and is 16,001 sq. ft. in size. REVIEW PROCEDURE: â€¢ Variance from the Residential Design Standards -pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410.020, Variances. The applicant is requesting a variance from L.U.C. Section 26.410.040 A.1. which states: "The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the intersecting streets. On curvilinear streets, the front fagade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street. Parcels as outlined in Subsection 26.410.010.B.4 shall be except from this requirement." The intent of these design standards is to encourage residential buildings that address the street in a manner which create a consistent "fagade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. STAFF EVALUATION: Staff has reviewed the application of the proposed Residential Design Standard variance for 1475 Sierra Vista Drive to maintain the structure' s existing orientation. Although the house triggers demolition, there are two criteria to base a residential design standard variance request on that can maintain the existing nonconformity. Only one of RECEPTION#: 621698. 07/22/2015 at 1 09:55:04 AM, 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO the two criteria must be met in order for a variance to be granted. The Community Development Director shall find that the variances if granted would: a) 26.410.020 D.2 "Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site- specific constraints. The orientation of the cone shaped lot on the end of the cul-de-sac functions differently than a square lot due to site constraints which limits the orientation of the house. The Applicant's proposal to maintain the existing foundation to offset construction costs makes it problematic to reorient the house to meet the Residential Design Standards. The roundness of the cul-de-sac creates and the cone shaped lot orient the house in such a way that it makes it difficult to set the structure parallel to the street. The variance approval permits the orientation of the house as it provides an appropriate design considering the site-specific constraints of the cone-shaped lot. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the application for a Residential Design Standard Variance, as noted above, to be consistent with the review criteria (26.410.020 D.2) and thereby APPROVES the request. APPROVED BY: 4 /2/16 G/v 'tilris Bendph, Community Develoi*nenbDih: ctor Date / Attachments: Exhibit A: Site Plan 2 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE 80 RA[MUS,AS;14,T,-1 ~ ~ /~ 91TF M AN KFYNOTES i ARCHITECTURAL TO FF 100' 0- EQUALS SURVEY ELEVATION 7858 444 . 2 ARCHITECTURAL SITEPLANISEDTO LOCATERESIDENC"ADDITION ONLY (SURVEYORTO CONFIRM EXACT LOCATIONIN FIELD) . ALL OTHER INFORMATION SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY 3 EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY i* 4 REFER TO SURVEY FOR ACCURATE EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING TOPOGRAPHY AND LOCATION OF EXISTINGUTILITIES 5 REFER TO LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR PROPOSED GRADING AND DETAILED LANDSCAPE -Â« INFORMATION , 9 / 4 . = -,-â€ž. 1 - --FF) _ 6*,STING TEIEPHONE PEI)ESTAL-Â·- 7~'1 1. EXISTINGELE'mC~/T~,.M-B ;11 T. - 111\ \ .XÂ» - I 11 \ ih/ .,4'h\'li 1!. I..., . ...12,1 1. ID OUT1!NE OF Â£*15% r-- AGPMALTORI~WAY f. 1,14, j.14': Ilc : I , I ioCAT,ONTORE,~IN .1- e.'E. 1. '' 11. r 1,QI-22 hy* Cl r'* 0 1 2 1\ -355=51; | r )' r 1 1 4 -' 1 e . 1 ' QS-K- 2- Â·Â·~057 Â·i2.N,r RE R...AN , h \l 41'71 E.al . ..1 1 1--*em-21 / t .1 / 4 Â·A .927- / LQI.M 10... K' i.7 ...-:Â·AGE \V 1 / ~ \\ \0 =MABC.E i I r<Z--IPRA .'F/%340\ \ ./3// L -- / : * & 1.' pL~*- - _ ---~~\~d;~'11 -/KlA Itt 4 -4 11 , pul -- -- -- . 1_2 1 ' r-r I PROPOSED TWO STORY REMODEL 1 " WITH BASEMENT [AREA DEPICTED WITH POCHE' a -11 2%Â¢1:3~0. - '/ 7 PrPPW- 1 M -/ A#2216 ~ 7 52 4,=mCHEN ' - ./2%,ZE~ Â¢ ..1.r - - PKTO 1 OUTINE.'DECK .OVE ' PER*6 S15020E 494 - -1 ?1 6 6 2% I t -11 i -k .1: --1-1,FIC...34~ 1 . - 327:ta EX!51 INGFENCE - N 'C' Boul,cA,1/ io UTIL. -----1-'- - / il ., \\\ ASPEN GOLF COURSE 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST ~~ A-02 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN I SCALE:1/8Â·=1'-0 06 15,2015 ARCHITECTS 3% rE k RECEPTION#: 621699, 07/22/2015 at 09:56:25 1 OF 3, 0 Doc Code RESOLUTiON Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION NO. 13 (SERIES OF 2015) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN APPROVING ONE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT 33, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING 1, AND COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE Parcel Identification Number: 2735-111-05-006 WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Allen Hodges, as owners of 1475 Sierra Vista Dr., submitted a request for one Residential Design Standards Variance for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and, WHER-EAS, the property is located in the R-15 Moderate-Density Residential zone district and is Lot 33 of the West Aspen Subdivision, Filing 1; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has reviewed the request and has submitted a recommendation to deny the variance request; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on July 7,2015; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that the approval of the one request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion o f public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Residential Design Standards Variance Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the variance request from the following Residential Design Standard that is underlined below, as represented in the application presented before the Commission and included as an exhibit to this resolution: A. 26.410.040.C.2.b. Parking, garages and carports. The front favade of the garage or the front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten (10) feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the house. The approval permits the placement of the garage forward of the front most wall o f the house by approximately eight feet, as it provides an appropriate design considering the site constraints of the cone shaped lot. Section 2: Building Permit Application Other than any variance granted, the building permit application shall be compliant with all other standards and requirements of the City of Aspen Municipal Code and all other adopted regulations. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided. and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court ofcompetentjurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 7th day of July, 2015. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Planning and Zoning Commission A 1 0 \ 9 ji Debl*Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Ryan Walterscheid, Chair ATTEST: L Â·A-./ f Cindy Klob, Records Manager Exhibit A: Site Plan A SERRAVISTADRIVE SiTEPLANKEYNOTES & - TECTURA_T O .0 mul-EC-/ bU:NEEY :EEVAT:ON 785644 A y A 2 - rECTURN.sirE PLANUSECTO.GATEREs,DE,KE,AL":TE,ouiÂ·r mu:'v.YOR,0 ' . 4 2 :* Ce- I , '-~CT LOC~TiOI+:NEJELD, . ..TiON SHOWN... ..STRATNE PURPOSES ON. ONTOURS SHOWN FOR ILLUSrRAT:VE FURPOSES ONLi % / 2 371% 1 . 1 / , 9 , . ie SURVEY FORACCURATE EXISUNG CON'IONS INCLUD./.OFOGRAPHY A./ LOD .ill OF: i VNG UnLINES b REFE' -ANDSCAFE .. CVL DRAUNGS FORPROPOSED GRADiNG AND DETAILED.ANDSCAPE iNFOR.ADON i~'-~' ,Or, 7-, / :. t.' I. ' til... I / : YA r'/ *19'3- 7 1Â·:e. 1,tif .Ue.LPLa:.NA ---1;~ ' . ......Ill ': ~ -2.. I 41 0 Â·Â· ..; ..1 1.- /,73)74:'.,iv:774 Â·'--$#MZÂ»A-tr3'e*WUÂ»*ffÂ«â‚¬ 94Â·Â·.1--t k Â·Â·I*fr LOT 32 1 -95Â·94184-~ al// ; 1 1Yff#filÂ»li*/ 32/./.34.1* 2 , ~~ti~-f"~, .. rfÂ»FS.4?6UÂ·*2 .., /:i~*#04~/*4:* - 1}61' ;: 99 ..~C i,94 jt~A J 6,1 27 'Â·:40>3.<c.:=3.~Â·,.Â·jitivÂ·..=Â» ~ < Oult44 07 S..1~R P-ELa --n 6.1.4 1.Â»Â¢16.1 5 2Â»Â« 4 Â¢4'' <tyâ‚¬.' :t ,# , ~ _~322 4:M,4.:h .Â·4% 'A,Â· Â· Â·, 6-'"/ 1-7,Â·,4,"r,Â· U.. VOAA -Al,TWC.e:'. d - t _ .Â· '10 . ' ~ ' 7.- i r r ...., =Â·FIA.':m%'I ' f- I T 1-Â·r - --[-Â·~7'~'~t. i 4 4, 7176 0:1.E--C | 44Â·IAL I I 7- /2& - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 , C.al ."10.- it ; / LQI.31 111/i Il *:,1 Gba~4- .14- UrL--1 ' ~~ 1 7 i , / La:/ , * .6'2#7Â·Â·-, Â·1: t.~ , 'Â· I ' wizzzz-f --Â· Â·- ; ./.k./.8- ~ : | ~:0~FLAC,6---.=-Lit.k u LveG : 21â€¢Il IPROPOSED TWO STORY REMODELi WIH BASEMENT ~ Â£ t. .k i Â£ CAREA DEPICTED WITH FICHE] : &9'7': ~-'-'. .' IM 1 + 2, L '966*:'J.Â·t'' t:q '92*11 9-- i 3-/91.-1 1 1=. L_- 3* --1 Ir.'z4(;9aILÂ·1544 2 - 77Â·,ri+QJ?3'Â·Â·6<9Â·r,M'/ CIL-Eil PATIO : 'e/Rd,11 . ' Â». . ././ Lf#4.-f:?;451*34-6-2-/2%. -L~: 6Ii 6Â«1Â·442~2*98:Eks.6 'f....,21. 5.--/ /-- 4095*&*94 3.9 -Â· :- - _----- - .---r.Forâ‚¬ ' " .4 - ...' 1/ LOT 1 ASPEN GOLF COURSE i.30.FEST --77 1 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE R E S D E NTIA L DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST /~~i A-02 1 PROPOSED SirE PLAN ! SCALE .84 = 1 Â·-0 06.15 2015 CIL 'ACHITE'll Â¢IL,trA E.tf ..1- - p . O 66'r lib Jennifer Phelan From: lan Dicker [jandicker@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:23 PM To: Jennifer Phelan Subject: Notice of Public Hearing - 1475 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen Dear Ms Phelan I am the owner of 1465 Sierra Vista Drive and I have no objections to the plans presented. Kind regards lan Dicker 1 VI.B. MEMORANDUM TO: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Sarah Rosenberg, Special Projects Planner THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive MEETING DATE: July 7, 2015 APPLICANT/OWNERS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Allen and Janet Hodges Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the variance request to REPRESENTATIVE: maintain the existing garage door location. Zone 4 Architects, Dylan Johns and Bill Pollock -' '-Lf'~~ *~9/ LOCATION: lilli/:4'91'll/MI'zillit .7/%71<2tp:Z~ 1475 Sierra Vista Drive ---0--Iliwigilwe CURRENT ZONING & USE: ilifille,killillimmill'lim:1:1:el.fle'll:iME::liwl/Wmji~ R-15 zone district, Single Family Residence -----Ill 116:.06*~ t 'fl e PROPOSED LAND USE: - ---28/444 The property will continue to be used . 41 4 residentially. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests the Planning and Figure 1: Image of property. Zoning Commission approve a variance from the Residential Design Standards to maintain the existing garage location. The current configuration has the garage forward of the front-most wall of the house and is street facing. This variance is necessary because the demolition threshold is to be exceeded requiring any existing nonconformities, in this case the garage location, to be brought into conformance. Page 1 of 4 P54 VI.B. LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval: Variance from the Residential Design Standards -pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410.020.D, Variances (Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review board for this request). The applicant is requesting a variance from L.U.C. Section 26.410.040 C.2.b. which states: "The front faQade of the garage or the front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten (10) feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the house." PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND: The subject property is located off of Cemetery Lane, outside of the designated Aspen Infill Area, on Sierra Vista Drive at the end of the cul-de-sac. The lot was improved in 1968 with a single family home, which still exists today. The parcel is located in the R-15 zone district and is 16,001 sq. ft. in size. 1 W . r 4 k_- PROJECT SUMMARY: 0 *- --' purchased the property in â‚¬ '...:'*fit 2013 with the intent to 1 . .0.= , fl* . ... 7/, 5-Â«,al , 1 â‚¬ 153L 4 90 ,=2'N remodel the existing two Â· 74:; 7,%1 1- " 0 .64 Â¥ - L '445* *' story residence. In May ~ ~2 . 44Â¢ 2014, a request to extend the i.45 Sierra Vista Dr. depth of the existing garage : .2,7 t.: towards the street was C.,6'*f.CR . 963 s : Sph: submitted. The request Â·izi#- .,91 l - would have increased the . 4 / -0. -h 1- nonconforming condition of , :.+ - . Â· . 1 1......Â£. ~ 1 16 having the garage forward ~ ._,* 1,@mA- of the front-most wall of the Â·17 1475 Stqrra Vis*' house, rather than being set / behind the wall of the ~ house. The property owners ~ 16*. ...7..ge decided not to proceed with -0 1 4% the variance as staff was . *4 â‚¬2/ & . M. unwilling to administratively approve the request and due to the fact Figure 2: Property and lot that a nonconformity is typically permitted to be maintained when a property is remodeled. In June 2015 a building permit was submitted that would exceed demolition allowances. where more than 40% of exterior walls and roof structure above grade is demolished, therefore requiring any existing nonconformity to come into compliance. The Applicant is proposing to salvage the existing foundation (to minimize construction costs) and the existing footprint is proposed to be maintained. Three variances were initially requested: building orientation, Page 2 0 f 4 P55 VI.B. location of the garage, and the design of the front porch. Since applying the building orientation variance has been granted administratively and the Applicant has stated that the porch design will be amended to be compliant with Code. 1 -u.-= ENIRY -.1a.1'."-"""=~ 1 -Â» 2 - ... 1 4 [LOCATION OF EXISTING ~23,*.~11~.'2 ,Â·i,ji,A AND PROPOSED] a-- '/ 4/39..7-'9Â·0504.VL, ~. *52.~7 2889/ <1/ \LOGATONOF 3 14 1 4/4/ 4, EXISTINGAND Â·"4: 54 2 PROPOSEDI ~fl 0 44 11 C 2 f'il 1 1 fÂ·>41"42Â·3*Â»Â·Â» - 1 0 1 ~ - OUTLINE OF PROPOSED ---4 52 HOUSE REMODEL< 1 ADDITION I . 1 ' ~76524-â€ž ' 34Â«*rÂ«22.4/94 3 1 1 --------- 1 1 11 11 1 1 Figure 3: Proposed garage location STAFF ANALYSIS: The Applicant proposes to maintain the garage in its current location due to the existing foundation; however, when demolition is triggered on a nonconforming structure, it is required to meet the Residential Design Standards. There are two design options for this property's garage to meet the residential design standards. One option is to 1) permit -the garage or carport may be forward of the front fagade of the house only if the garage doors or carport entry are perpendicular to the street (side-loaded)" or 2) have "the front facade of the garage or the front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten (10) feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the house." The proposed design of the front faGade has the house set back from the garage. The Residential Design Standards were created with the intent of preserving "established neighborhood scale and character", to promote the pedestrian experience, and to contribute to the streetscape in the neighborhoods throughout the City. Staff has examined the variance request in terms of the criteria for Variances from Residential Design Standards (Exhibit A). Page 3 0 f 4 P56 VI.B. There are two criteria to base a residential design standard variance request on - 1) Does the request provide an appropriate pattern of design based on the context of the surrounding neighborhood and the purpose of the particular standard, or 2) Is the request clearly necessary for reasons of fairness due to unusual site-specific constraints. Only one of the two criteria must be met in order for a variance to be granted. Staff Comment: Many Of the houses in the Sierra Vista Drive neighborhood were built before the Residential Design Standards were established, resulting in some existing noneonforming houses. Out of approximately 25 houses, 14 of them have street facing garages and are not compliantwith the Residential Design Standards. Although some of the structures in the neighborhood are nonconforming, this does not mean that a propert'y should maintain its nonconforming design when demolition occurs. Examples Of redevelopment that meet the standard are also within the neighborhood. Since the subject property is going through redevelopment and triggers demolition, it should become a conforming structure. The Residential Design Standards were established to ensure that a home contributes the streetscape. Specifically, with garage design and location, the intent of the standards is to "minimize the presence ofgarages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist."By meeting the standard, the presence ofgarages will be minimized as redevelopment of older properties continue in the neighborhood. Staffdoes not believe the shape Of the lot to be a significant detriment to the redevelopment. RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff believes that the request does not meet the variance review standards that are set forth in Land Use Code Section 26.410.020 D, Variances for the Parking. garage and carport variance request as there are examples of residences meeting the standard and there is not a site specific constraint. Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny this application. The Resolution is written in the affirmative, approving the request. Changes may be necessary depending on the motion. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to deny the request for a variance from the Residential Design Standard as noted in Resolution . Series of2015." ATTACHMENTS: â€¢ EXHIBIT A - Review Criteria â€¢ EXHIBIT B - Neighborhood Images â€¢ EXHIBIT C - Application Page 4 0 f 4 P57 VI.B. RESOLUTION NO. (SERIES OF 2015) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN APPROVING ONE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT 33, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING 1, AND COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE Parcel Identification Number: 2735-111-05-006 WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Allen Hodges, as owners of 1475 Sierra Vista Dr., submitted a request for one Residential Design Standards Variance for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and, WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-15 Moderate-Density Residential zone district and is Lot 33 of the West Aspen Subdivision, Filing 1; and WHEREAS the Community Development Director has reviewed the request and has submitted a recommendation to deny the variance request; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the developmentt proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on July 7,2015; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that the approval of the one request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and we] fare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Residential Design Standards Variance Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the variance request from the following Residential Design Standard that is underlined below, as represented in the application presented before the Commission and included as an exhibit to this resolution: P58 VI.B. A. 26.410.040.C.2.b. Parking, garages and carports. The front fagade of the garage or the front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten ( 1 0) feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the house. The approval permits the placement of the garage forward of the front most wall of the house by approximately eight feet, as it provides an appropriate design considering the context of the neighborhood. Section 2: Building Permit Application Other than any variance granted, the building permit application shall be compliant with all other standards and requirements of the City of Aspen Municipal Code and all other adopted regulations. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED B-Y the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 7th day of July, 2015. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Planning and Zoning Commission Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Ryan Walterscheid, Chair ATTEST: Cindy Klob, Records Manager Exhibit A: Site Plan P59 VI.B. Exhibit A Review Criteria 26.410.020.D Variances Variances from the Residential Design Standards, Section 26.410.040, which do not meet this Section may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Historic Preservation Commission. if the project is subject to the requirements of Chapter 26.415. An Applicant who desires to consolidate other requisite land use review by the Historic Preservation Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning Commission may elect to have the variance application decided by the board or commission reviewing the other land use application. An Applicant who desires a variance from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variance, if granted would: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine i f the exception is warranted; or Staff Response: Many of the houses in the Sierra Vista Drive neighborhood were built before the Residential Design Standards were established, resulting in some existing nonconforming houses. Out of approximately 25 houses, 14 of them have street facing garages and are not compliant with the Residential Design Standards. Although some of the structures in the neighborhood are nonconforming, this does not mean that a property should maintain its nonconforming design when redevelopment occurs. Examples of redevelopment that meet the standard are also within the neighborhood. Since the subject property is going through redevelopment and triggers demolition, it should become a conforming structure. The Residential Design Standards were established to ensure that a home contributes the streetscape. Specifically, with garage design and location, the intent ofthe standards is to 'minimize the presence ofgarages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. By meeting the standard, the presence of garages will be minimized as redevelopment of older properties continue in the neighborhood. Staffdoes not find this criterion met. b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: The subject parcel is a 16,001 sq. ft. lot at the end of a cul-de-sac. The Applicant is requesting a variance from the Residential Design Standards to maintain the existing footprint of the garage and the door location. Staff is a-ware that the cone shaped lot does produce difficulties in redevelopment, however, Staff does not believe the shape of the lot to be a significant detriment to the redevelopment. Staff does not find this criterion met. 1 P60 1 : : J . 9 74.2-g**41*tej:k-. + 4/746/7378 / tu311433ftf;8~ '311Â·~24441.4*.3*11Â»Qr '611 - -m,~5"twr.,-4.9*h,Ti49Â£46/4 0 .lf' 4<14<trk"* flt-I#U. -29Â« -cjtft 63'I'Â»~'?growLV.i:Â·iks:Â· ttit *ly 0 - I 91/.1- Â¥,-1 '1.- . f . 1- . .. - - 9 - 5 :jÂ·r-*.,c :gr~4 &-712& 4, Ud. /,4.- 3.' r , ..: 7 7. . :AS â€¢ 74. i i. : = F.97.0, '*,'Wtq'~: '3 1. r Â· eÂ·-- t.: 4. '449 ..'' '~t U '-A 44 ,"'*.-AA r - -r -- '"24 12 . 531-1 2. 21 32-4. '-2 '74 le -1 .... : Râ‚¬r'. 4V tt# . ..... 14 6 - r./12 . ... .,5/: I. I I ... I. I .- . -,4.Â©i#wy â€¢ 190 -1 3 Â· 4 el> 7.. I .- 1 ..29 2 44.22 17 . 4-* . '~'*<_. 24149 e 'I <*~ - _ Â© k.9:0-1.4.XY.-.Â· . - -<4Â· , t- d.** * & ::--~/:f'J / '~''~~-'': Â·~ ~ ":Ce/1 .5.2/.0.01â‚¬L ~I=,1'1Â· 21,ejp~Â·.36Â·1â‚¬r.5~0 .. i . , 1~"tikit VI.B. .e Â·/1 %'.:' 4 1 91*r- + " k dver;124: T'.98:. , Â·e t /4. 42 ..l .13,Â« t ~ Â«R Â·XÂ· 1354 Sierra Vista . B '5 -EE#An'Â£83160 49,4 v -I le/,86/2.1,9/91&4*.IN/&49://i 1390 Sierra Vista *Â·y ../#//4 â€¢ r- %1Â»w W :12- -9.1 - .../64. /. 462 V , 74'L t It. ~~ * 4Â·Â£ ij 3 ' . ..:e I , V. ': '. I /_ r 4, -Il V + I L i .111" 9 - 4 1 92 $ 1 = 1395 Sierra Vista + 20 g:-42- . Ir 91%* ~ ~4,Â» % I . './*I P62 VI.B. Mil *IlleÂ· 9, .* w ~Â£77*Â¥~6 y..~Â·:,~ .31â€ž4 M 4 -4,Â¥1. . b 1.:. b 1 T-...;44 -9442 ' * .' Â¥2 6 " c. Jr=+ , :1.1 . -- m 70. ' 1410 Sierra Vista - "Ar = Â¥ 0, t 1. 0/ 3 1412 Sierra Vista hrs: 9 ./ - *4 S. Jar . f.. 1 21-UItti~ V& - 1417 Sierra Vista .A L.Â·.m >if 1 7. c . 4â‚¬. -01 :. r41*flÂ·; P63 .... 43, I. I / 4 7 Â· 7*irt : *A. v r: . Winâ€¢tr.. : r U 'ap- Z /. r, SE. - 5 ,%4 t* Ott U .ChÂ¢ 4-k. f, $ . I . â€¢ 1. '' 4 k' ,~0 â‚¬ . U. 4, - 1 ~*81 ' 44 t.. . -1 1.-1 --Ija:.-iw ... Â·Â· I :- l Ze I ,, 4.- 1 ., 'd -- ut a 24 2 30-1 . VL,'1,7%~ ..h .0: 1 3:2 '4 u# I /4:7 .AS,h.-:4.*c,r h . r .14.-. V * .1 9. 4/ :c ~Â©Â·11.'... 1. 1.~ - - W r,>i b 4 1 S .t 1 4% 0 'I i ...1:7 VI.B. , /. ~. , I . 4 I k , 4 --- 1450 Sierra Vista ; 41 ..4* 9 Al== 3.. 4 .. 9, 4 90 ; Lit ./ 61 ' '' 1460 Sierra Vista *.._ t 44 : 4 4-4 Â¢4< 6 t I -t :9 .rai .â‚¬ 191.~ 7/6 I. .... V*. Â· I I 1465 Sierra Vista CÂ©. - P65 Â·9 9.. .m'2Â· 1: .DD G . 20+ .. 3415.: 6 +24~ A ... -,9-/ . :k " 2-*. ~.F ' 4,4.,0 4 .'ll .... ir 9/ 1, .. . 4.- -i.2 B r /4 .44 .. 4. 0 - Â· 4 r - 1 - ' .1 Â£ -s- W E lit, . A.kÂ· Aff=~ 1 rt "77 3 r (1 e.r _ a. A --u- ' - 4*All.... I ..,2 9... Â« 'W' r ..1*. U 1 -,3 u v - -:- r:V'p Â·Â·% 2 f e -.IG :r.97 X. D, k ....4 7... . . 1.r.Â»2- I . . #-14Â¢ ~i-,32 -4 .f,--13,46,4 - I Â· Â· .1 t" 7*73:43 7/ 1.21 .Â· ' v T- t~ Â· . :PQ 99 .ft . J 9,. 4.- .../ r.1, ....4 .2>27 1.46.ffe ..ty/* -1-â€ž V 1 El 25 .*. .F- - .Â· 12 2-Â·k - 1 ..i . 9 - 1 S:U<* '%. 1. 'i--14Â£*f,. - 4 :-â‚¬.1Â¥. Â£ - . - 0 * - 4* . ... .. . .. . I F:. 4>4~9 5, '*. t.f f 3,2*w: ..1'Ct:-t.''t: ~2233>? 4$44,* t<Â·~0 J.Â·3 -.**:~ ~.. Â·t .4*;~4fy:tÂ·~1~-*Aw.Â·' dr Â£ I 4,-Â»,7 ,Â¢17.,1 . ..L 4,1/1,~74,<,9-~,4'-:'~4. :Â· ~ i.. ~ -r- ~Â¥61.22 4.7 7 . -6~ 92' 24 ... I.Vâ€¢Â· /-1*3..?1 - 2. 4**Cifi lit<Â· - - ~Â· 9. 3 1 6- Â£ 9, ' -- 4 Â¥%7- 6-,1 - j .1 ffâ‚¬*fiti k. ~Â·4<~4;.0~-:~. -~~I;% ~~'~a *1~34 ~., . A. 31,71Â·64 7.14 ''* ..1/ .,99 0 'â‚¬01 4.-F- / * L, 26/2'. -1 .& - '. * L,~~~.~42.4, r $/ - /1 /:- .N. F 1./ ffijAV .Â·- ,~ 9, I I. 2,Â» . . Ji'll'll...il, 8 I Â·tÂ·=Fltrvlk.' 1.~ 0.. 1. - 1, AL /61 . â€¢ve. wi -u-aa i 1 0 .t / n I I e Â·fE, ' -- vil Â·t i .Obitr- ~ - : , ...2 'b b.-2-6.J,Â¢. 6,-,.425, Â¢29 14-b,4/i .tf, , I f 44~ -p- - Cr~ *m,92*21*LWWKEVF/k',3 *432 f; . ~924~ .FÂ«ig=*..2.40 .~ - 7~ ~ v w '3.-ild Ai ;2+ 4- 14:21#9 . Li 11 6 . 12 +C< fli ~t~Ai>ft t a . .. 1. - t - Â¥1.. * Emift '/4. - .44Â£,Â£*27Â·Am Â» - "90#.f~94~r.râ‚¬':4-1~ 4 4 1 <t,J >. 11 6 - 7." 2 -I- . 4. + 5- --il - . 1_* 05 4 + 1 ; 4<342,44, * . .. VI.B. Z O.N E JUN 2 4 2015 CO ARCHTTECTS L L C. June 15,2015 Ms. Sara Nadolny City o f Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Gatena Street Aspen. CO 81611 RE: Request for an administrative Residential Design Standards variance for property located at 1475 Sierra Vista Drive. Dear Sara, This is an application to consider an administrative variance exemption for thi-ee elements of the proposed design submitted for the project located at 1475 Sierra Vista Drive which is legally described as Subdivision: West Aspen: Lot: 33. Filing: 1. The first element is building orientation. the second is the garage door orientation/setback, and the third is a question regarding whether the proposed front entry porch/canopy conforms to the iiitent ofthe code. A brief history of this project is that the current Owners purchased the property in 2013 with the intent to remode[ the existing 2 story residence in order to lipdate the existing house, and working to hold to 1 a limited budget. As the project design developed, more and more of the existing structure was 1 subtracted because it was more cost effective to replace old construction with new rather than work aroimd the existing framing. The Owner's fundness fbi- the size and shape of the existing structure nieant that they did not need to start from scratch, mid they wished to continue utilizing whatever I elements possible in order to save money- the niost significant element being the foundation and utilitin J iii May 2014, an administrative request to move the front door of the garage towards the street was not 1 approved because it was increasing a non-conformity, and the property owners decided not to proceed with the val iance any further due to cost and an overall value engineering decision to minimize any disturbances and additional costs. There were discussions with staff about maintaining the existing ~ non-conformity, and staff at the time was supportive of that. Whether thoughts have changed or a mistake was made, we have been directed to apply for an administrative val-lance for three building r elements listed below. 26.410,040.A, I).Site Design-Building orientation i 26.410.040.C.2.b), Front Faâ„¢le Garage, o Section 26.410.040.D. 1.b), Front Porch (Interpretation of definition and intent of code provision) i ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2508 ASPEN COLORADO 81612 P68 00 VI.B. Administrative variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance ibr not more than three (3) of the indWidital requirements. An applicant who desives a variancefrom (he residential design stajidards shall demonstrate, and die Community Development Director shall jindlhal the Â¥arionces, ifgranted, would: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context iii which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular slandard. hi evalucifing the context as it is used in the criteria the director may consider the relationship Of the proposed development with adjacent stitiefures. die immediale -neighborhood selling or a broader vicinity as die director.Reis is necessary to determine ij'the exception is warranted: or b). Be clearly necessary jar reasons offairness related to unusual site-specijic constraints. The Community Development Director shall provide the Planning and Zoning Commission an annual report ofapproved administralive variances. Responses to Standards: 26.4 10.040.A.I), Site Design-Building orientation The inten f of these design standards is to encourage rexidemial buildings fliat address the sitÂ·eet in a manner whielt creafes a consistent '71<ade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, where.fences or dense landscaping exist or are proposed, it is intended that f hey be ilsed to define the boundaries ofprivate property without eliminating (lie visibility offlie house and front yard from the street 1. Bilikling orientation. Thefrontfacades of all principal structures shall be parallel to flie street, On corner lots, bom streel-facing facades must be parallel to the imersecting streets. On curvilinear streels, the from fact,(ie ofall strucmres shall be parallel to the fangent of f he midpoin f of the are of the street. PmÂ·cels as 011 flined in Subseefion 26.4 10.010.13.4 shall be exempt.front this requirement. Context- Diagram A-04 shows that out o f out of 25 houses in view within this area, 10 of the houses do not meet the Building orientation standard. including all but one of the houses which are located on the cul-de-sac of Sierra Vista Drive around 1475 Sierra Vista. tt is clearly a prevalent condition within the neighborhood to not always have houses align with the specifics ofthis standard, especially when comparing to the code defiiied location for the tangent line. Fairness/Site specific constraints- The property owners wish to maintain the existing foundation to save at least $250,000. If the tangent to the cul-de-sac is taken at intersection of the cul-de-sac and the west property line, the existing building (and thus the proposed design) is parallel to the tangent at that point. Dead end streets function differently than thru streets, where the orientation of the residence changes fiÂ·om a relationship to the street edge (typical condition and how the RDS is written), to a relationship with the center point ofthe cut-de-sac (which is how the house is currently positioned). Exhibit A-05 shows the code defined tangent vs the tangent taken at the western property line tangent point is included with the application, and is apparent when visiting the site. Per the intent of the code, the current fagade orientation would very much create a consistent fa,ade line if the other houses took the rowidness of the cul-de-sac into consideration and measured tangents relative to the center of the cul-de-sac. ZONE 4 ARC.'HI'rECTS PO BOX 2508 ASPEN COLORADO 81612 P69 VI.B. 26.4 10.040.C. Parking, garages and curports. The intent offlze following parking, garages and carport standards is to minimize the potential for con.flicts between pedestrimt ami automobile fraffic hy placing parking, garages mid corports on alleys or to minimize tile presence of garages ami carpoils as a lifeless part oj'the streeiscape where alleys do not exist. 2. For all residential uses thal have access only from a public street, f he,foflowing standards shall be apply: b) Thefront facade ofthe garage or the front-most supporting column of a cari)ort shal 1 be set back at least ten 00) .feet further from the street than the fron f-most ival' of tile liotise. Context- Diagram A-04 shows that out of out of25 houses in the survey area, 14 of the houses face garage doors towards tlie street (including all but one of the houses which are located on the all-de-sac of Sierra Vista drive around 1475 Sierra Vista) and the majority of those houses do not meet the standards ofthe garage doors being at least 10 feet behind the front most fagade ofthe building. One ofthe reasons for the updates to the RDS that was done in 2005 was because of planning and zoning's frustration with having to spend time reviewing Cemetery Lane garages, and hence why the administrative option was added to the code section (so that Staffcould give variances). Relative to the neighborhood context in this area. this configuration is more common than the design standard requirement, and in this case the lot does not easily allow the RDS conditions to be met in their entiiÂ·ely. Fairness/Site specific constraints-The property owners wish to maintain the existing foundation to save approximately $250,000, which means that the house's location is fixed within the site. Regardless of where the building footprint is located, tlie options for accessing this property are severely limited because of the pie shaped lot configuration, and exacerbated by the narrow end beitig located along the street. Specifically, if the entry moves forward so that it complies with the 10 foot setback, the emergency turning area disappears and creates a condition where cars must back into the street. 1 his also significantly changes the footprint area of the residence and effectively necessitates a new foundation, which places a financial hardship onto the property owneis. Even though the lot is larger than [5.00(}sfit is not possible to modify the design to side load the garage. A vehicular study is illustrated on sheet A-06 which shows that in order for the side [oaded configuration to work, the driveway must cross over the propeity line to meet minimum torning radii o fa standard vehicle. It is also not be possible to face the garage northwest and not create a long list of conformance issues, not least of which is standard 26.-4 10. 040.D.la. Give that the garage doors ai-e approximately 90 feet away from the edge of pavement (and one of the furtbest houses from the pavement within the observed area per Sheet A-04), and is heavily screened with trees which will niostly remain (Sheet A-03), the property does not and will not ever comply with the intention of the code because the site constraints do not allow for a typical pedestrian oriented relationship between the street the house, and vehicular access. ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2508 ASPEN COLORADO 81612 P70 VI.B. Code Interpretation: Section 26.410.040.D.1.b), From Porch The intent of the F,liowing building element standards is m ensure that erich residential building has street-facing architectural defails ami elentems, which provide Imman scale to i fle facade, enhance tile walking experience mid rein.foree local building traditions b) .4 covered entry porcli ofjiffy (50) or moresquarefeet, with a minimum depth of six (65 .feet, shall be part of the froil f facade. Entry porehes and can opies shall not be more than one (1) story iii height. Response: It isnot clearifitis necessary to consider a variance from the RDS related to the porch/canopy elenient in this case, or whether a code interpretation is more appropriate. The design as submitted includes a 4 fectof overhang with a 2 foot canopy. Based on the definition of a Porch as being a "unheated AREA under a roof' (see below), it was felt that the combination of the canopy and overhanging area of the second floor met the criteria for Porch, since it was a one story eleinent (the AREA that comprised the porch being only one story tall), and meets the depth and area parameters for the Porch elenient above. The RDS criterion for the one story element is being met through another element of the fagade (and section. 26.410.040.D.2 First sfory element states that while there may not be accessible space over the first story element- it is NOT precluded to be over "reniaining first story elements of the front favade"- i,e, the porch). The poich area as designed clearly indicates the location of the entry door on the favade based on the architecture of the house (3D view attached on Sheet A-14) and meets the intent ofthe code to create pedestrian scale. The Residential Design Standards "Purpose" section states, "The standards do not prescribe architectural style, but do require that each home, while serving the needs of its owner, contribute to the streetscape.' The proposed design is an example ofa contemporary architectural style, and within that architectural language there is an association with forms, such as what is represented iii the proposed design, which clearly represents the entry~ based on the orientation and architectonics ofthe forms. Advancements in building technology have allowed for architectural expressions which were not commonly seen in Victorian times, however worldwide acceptance and use ofthe contemporary style of design has clearly established alternate forms of expression fortraditional residential compotients. An alternate design has also been presented on Sheet A- 13 which extends the Canopy itself to be 6 feet deep, which would meet the standard by itsel f (without the addition of the depth of the 2.d Hoor oveihang included). The code does not state or imply that a canopy element that meets the letter ofthe code cannot be attached/associated with an additional overhanging mass. but simply requires that a pedestrian scale element is provided which demarcates an entry that conforms to certain dimensional specifications. Zone 4 would bewilling to ainend the design to expand the canopy i fit were felt that by doing so. the standard would be more clearly met. Definitions from- 26.104.100. Definitions. Canopy. A rootilike cover tha projects inore than five (5) fbel from the wall of a building. Porch. An uninsidated, unheated area under a roof, enclosed on at least one side by an exterior wall of a building and open on at leasi two sides to the outdoors, with or without sctÂ·eelis, ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2508 ASPEN COLORADO 81612 P71 VI.B. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENS]ONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM PIKed. 1+75 51*Alt~\ASTA 3*wr. AB602,Â·~<2- /~/5Â«04 Vi>-r* gs,loD*.4- Appricairt: ,44. $ /1's. ALLS4 Pei>es$ / 140*/+ A-H,Â®r.7-6 : LAC Location: /4Zy 1/6â€¢g, VATA ,Â· 45,11,60 8/6/t j Wet.r Ad?F42Â·Â·'r:33, Zone District: A-) 1 Lot Size: /6,002 3. F, Lot Area: /6,<50 2 5.2 (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within tlie high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the de finition of I,ot Area iii the Municipal Code,) Colmilercial. net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing, Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3 Proposed: 6 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 35 88,141]owable: 4560 6.1, Proposed: 45'51Â·6 6.rÂ· principalbidg. heigid: Existing: 5 29 Allowable: 03.5' Proposed: 01.7' Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing, Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: .Eristing: /7, 2 7 Required. Proposed:._as, 72 % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: 2 5' Required: 25" Proposed: 251 Rear Setback: Existing: /0' Required: joi Proposed: 40' Combined F/R: Existing; Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: /O' Required: /O f Proposed: jO' Side,Setback: Existing: /O' Required: /0' Proposed: /O' Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: t Distance Between .Exism,g Required: Proposed:- Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: 40* ..,-eq'orrr,42*-Â· Au/4*46+ OttedraÂ»{ 1441 0,44 FL46-12. pROâ‚¬(1) 4-04,47-/OA~. Variations requested: ,94 /wr,4// 4,1- f.e,~POR'111*126 (Na"e> AaovÂ© Aâ€¢*b ,â€¢E:-GZUG,rr~ lf~TA>< 7'04Â£.0 Put/4.,\ VNW'trl... P72 VI.B. VICINITY MAP I N.T.s. ' f 7 -14Â· 64 , Fy I '-&/titi, t'/2 t'w,v, Dt N 1 : i ..~i.; ,i. iii. U ' Â· DENE -1 1--, 42, Aspen -1 b '1 - Meado-,vu 4 4\0 11 efort r , r â‚¬,1 4 bia 11 ed Bit i le ; Cemetefy . . 'P .01 1 it92 Â· i : f'I 44 1 , <7 > $ : i'l,ft,9 :If L PROJECT SITE -~ e (AN -11. CE) 2 .4'.i.)7:<-9 5~Â·ir :t'' - A /132â‚¬ -r- MUt I tulden Matolt b Map.Â»: 1 Mintiâ€¢.94Â·.3 i et PJ 4.1.40? 81 4 . 1 . Hal,ching M.isell:Ii , -3 I S i Â·pen I ligh Â·9 k 2,1 School - Aspen Valley 110,59 al Wheeler , Opera 1 1<Dube f ~ 1-1 Project Site: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 P73 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT - . LOT 33, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 1 14'CH LEGEND LINE TYPE LEGEND ~lah,Â·-92.12 0 1 t. .-Al*..F.-j.:I ACCORDING TO THE THE PLAT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5,1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 252 .Ull.T CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO m- .........._ [,2 ...'.1, \ .'* '.;thltri~ O ~YMBOL[for.ND I \ i N â€¢1(,â€¢â€¢r,e. '4. =ilfl. Â·Â·Of *\ 11*.1,1. I 11â€ž--~.1 it an '.ava~ â€ž.nâ€žV k .'*.WRWb.A 9 ' # hiyÂ«*Ill ,=n, \ V...MAP -3 .7- - w m.1. ...@"peâ€ž,e. .r E TREE.,ART " ~43 , /r i 54,4 r~~r.. rn- TnE 1-Â»1â€¢l' 1,lin~ ' 1- JI' I - An c , â‚¬.-- ' . . - .Mt= >41 j-, -LLI i ~l--,iÂ¢ 1 1, . *" ....$ 1 1. - i - ' .~44â€ž .4 1 1. 9 3 4--4 L . \ ) i 1 4 . ./." 1 1 . .Râ€¢ 1 GRIEHIC SCALE 11 .4.â€ž. 1 â€ž - 1 1Â·U F ===:t 4 / /1 f 1 .... . \ . W hn-.1 ' I I . .9, 12 - "IZIng'"'Imi . : =:r \ \3 . Ill 4(.-: 1 u . â€žâ€ž 1"IN""-1,1'Dn-"1â€¢r,Palo~-i,1~14A1,1â€ž11. ~... _,1.-~1, 1 i / ... 0,Â·monAm , 13 ~-D-' I.lull"ll./1~IrÂ¥~Il./.-Iâ€¢/IIUI'i , r.r'.7, 1 1 ..1 1 lf-A. 1 11 / 9,â€¢â€¢ V 1â€¢ . I. \ *K# DIZ.M."-7-'Ill.,Il-Â«2 I .U.I..- -). L .Il. , I l ; 9 744,030- , 9- In I râ€¢,I~ TIâ€¢Iâ€¢ -M*=k~â€¢ lin 1 . . 41. /1 1 . 'Tâ„¢ .. 11.-/ 1 â€ž . 1 . . l. /1 1 -n~.,Â·c*-iâ€ži-%-i neD,Ii 0,-MÂ«,., 0 ...., . --l.*W- F-*Â¥*10~. Ul ~a~rl*I' 1-Dir*i :,Â· iE 1 CÂ¢Â»11/ 1 i : 'f ., ng - '- I.IT./ i.v,~uli,lial/alir[*>r '.E Im . wrivol I r 1 : I - ............ INÂ·-/.IMIVI VI--ZE. .. -... #1-IM~F1~1/A~1~.---%#-Il --U; 1Â» . till : IN I n -i.â€¢ m-r- i-, -#-M% -, 1--9 L =291. 11 1 1 , .0 =1-1Â¤#tl,#I-U-fi ~~ I~ 52/. ilÂ· Â·11 -' .m. 1 , ... .0/ . I. Â» ,(1' I- . F. . 1 1 49005*.-- B.pâ€¢*.I=.â€¢n,r,T, .1, -'/ 1 1, . '1':1. 1 ** 1 17 - WU ty//4/,0123 '1.... I. ' '. 1 K>Gif -1*.'%: 1 , -I -I'll.t,1'.110,Km0rr-Wl'IRI/-,4 *1 1 I W -*111 iii - AT~ .1= 11Â» 1 n,-. I -/ 1 nui Â·,c. *. 'r f ria ....1 : *2 =- 1 , .*i#t .... -t 1. 1 Â» I ./ -, 1 AEtN L 1, r .,12?A . 1...2, ' . 11 1 99-1, 21 . CGC~-'11+ I. m ' # I. t 1 \ 1% ~,1â€žble, r k, Â· , ....... 1 1 - r i i \ I'll ! mt- i . I â€¢ W M.T.I 1= 1 =l :.4 1 :%2: 1 '... 1 0 4- id - --- -- -9-_6113 1 =SPE(,co~.Arn i.00! 1 ... 1 A.:Ii F ,=i ~ r'Icil- CÂ»C,) 1 .Â£.4.. 1 .Â£17. 1 ... 1 0,0 .... I .0-% 1 PEAK 1 2 .1., .'......A - 1/Af= *UE'/11060/.NlA jANtra '49[]68 i M~ff $l~VFV m. IMPROVEMENT*TOPOSLRVEY -- Surve,Ing,1.. LOT 33. WEST ASPEN SUB. PLG NO. i ....1.Â»4 ENES.EM?kil J Â· '9 I,Â·. 11* Â· Rild'0,1â€ž 14?5 SIERRA VISTI DRIVE 0/ 20.0 =mt... D'Ld NEMAYm.1 /12 - 4,/ 47 #12, \\ 3 A \1,1.t 1.411,//...i '4 . 3 7 '. 4.Vy -Â· .,6~ Hi.?W~n#plp*11'-ftig~.iiI* KINT - 1,-1-:' 1 l.~1~;\,~~-..4 . ....Ek#fi.1.,~}b~.tesl:50Â·Â·;.- LQDZ 2.'....,111*.f:,:*-3. ~~, 1, /, AN?I,''l,7* 1EL ~ ., 'M~,~r~ w'~ 0~ ~'~~~ 1.~ri.,~N- _ Â· -. $1/3(. i 9 2.-64<.A.'.94 ' 3 ./L . _ 1. ' . ..1. 1 -R. . ~ ~ ~- 1--~~~ViiÂ· -f 3::it, 7. 1.7 ' w . C - ~ O l' 1 A r ,/:...,1, >1 k .11~1// ,-' 4 If /2.2. 1 - \. V ' wl f // Â·: Â¥29 - '1 7 4-F '91 1..049 1.-- | 1 72 'Mf 0 cif 'Ajt~t~>9:.... - .3 1 Ul '45440 9, .022/4,/Digi'ji:&44Â·{ft pti Â·Â·8Â·Â·-60,6 . ...Â·/ C.T.~- i N.-.9 4 ,Â·4 Â·Â·4$-4579:Al 4 1,175$â‚¬IVISTAIM , r .1 U. '912Â·jectâ‚¬ -4.:tep 9 M-b#& R.. 1 Al .% 6=41Â©331 -- z.Â· I 4 ~d 'ir' I-' ~ C.' - fÂ·:-- jv,-.'~~; #*07.- r, / 1 5.A...LAJ/Oj.Â·/'4 1'1 1 11,7â€¢~1 Ilm,Lb-4,1 #â€¢WD .-*ki g:454114.~ I Â·'â€¢' 1 '.' '...I Â· . * li ..:4"EA. i Â·â€ž-'4:'*61(4:9Â·91 4.l l" , -LQI.:1 A - ity..E.,4, Lla.,r,Qt ' cli----- ASPEN GOLF COURSE < 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE R E 51 :9 1 NT : Al DESIGN STANDARD VARI iN C E REOLEE Aol 1 EXLSTING SITE PLAN .r = 1'Â·0' 0 6 19 2015 CIL A.CH,TEOT. 9Zd -10*,views Sil?RA vISTA [14'i '~ t - < mO .~*â€¢IN / ......,0....t#/9-a./.110.-i.Â· ' ..1/.i- S--Â·91.im*OT-*IrÂ£/7....i,Oll......FN./.0 I 4, O/ER ICÂ»'Ukle, '-r]R *51,UTT,E P -(3335 CS.V. / , .......#-I...1.-AA........' ' . /1 TO E..... I'll-Z C. STÂ»C c.l' CÂ»,Si..DI. 1....f41,.....TK,4 / .., 9.434 3.3 3,11 ~E.eTTfÂ£UTilnES ' ....0..PE........SH:'//Â£~ED....0.-9........â‚¬ -r i ..I' ..,44.Â·Â·.1,/3.1 3 ,+ ' . 3.-,4/719 ; 1 3 51> : 3~Â·Â·:.'),v>.it , 140 .Aid' 1;. 1 fLFEAÂ·#br lot-~4416, ,Afl-, , .,~â€ž-i.-c.-'- /'Wl.t~40917Â¢'. >al.%,,19,1,1 ....,. Â·Vi *AÂ·.1 A,Â»1'. Â·- A 'Â·t~, i.~~4-i~ff.Â·4//43-Mur'Â·,24&*Emot#Faumna",4, V Â·Â·-" 3.~ ppa rÂ·- 4-% 11,Â¥71-:.1 L<i 1 1 >4,213+44/hi 7 < c.,F:fk'UlY{6 0- .4.;/A,2.igc~f\R'wttÂ· 14 -: \ 1."Â£3.*9Â©6=r \ 9 1.,W, 11 *5Â»2 p. M /1 : l.:'14* r :0'IM C '7(3*04.4,1 ~41?,1 40.- r-- i 19( 1 '11 1 6-f 1 ' .41 1 1 -0 hi ,4 Â·-: A N * , -9 CD 41 IY' Â·-~+-+-rtiJ---1-_44-x_i~-L~ - 1.# -5-..04',f:, A 1) , A->,z- ! : ; fif 7 'i\~ht \2. . Â· 1 ~ ) t f / 1012 9 ...,1 1 I i - 1<1 Â·\Â·\F 4 I ' --1 1- : 1-11 .... ..1 %. ~4,1 WR .' / 1 i g) flÂ·' > >P&61 3 Â·'* 1 ,*OPOSED TWO STORY.1Â«ODEL WID,BASE~ENT IAREA DEPreTEO Vr!111 Rxlrl 4- 11~ 1 1 =3 1 1 /63-l:~~~%Â·Â·r *23Â·, 6 ./ #PAd..2.Â·,14*--, I 1 1.. E" , Â· Â·: Ull ~37.i':.fi *.':Â·' 1 4- 21- f .t?.1''Â·Y.'C* ,.<'2: ---~ Â·1 4"*ne,e, JATI~ / *1 4/1 1.77 ..,, ,1 2441'f\.1, j>-c; rze= i-/1 ~. i . ==#i\*B- Â»L- 1 ,-1 ./ . t .... .- -I.' I.,Eâ‚¬,-Â·*14-- . N Tarr.., *~ .3,447 4.2Â· f Â·" ,Â·-, iÂ· Â· ,289.N/.%-Â·- 'UÂ¥/'884â€¢i -Â·--452Â·i, :lili->Fohot. .. - -c L.<.:344&'1'E--cll~ -4-:11-e-- ' ~3Â¥Â·'~ Mr hi 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RES1DENT!â€¢l DESÂ·GN STANDARD VAR ANCf REOUEST A 02 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1 SCALE : 1'8Â·=1Â·-3. 0 E 15.20I5 Ci m.m-â€¢I .Pirial#,NA:....1,--,- -411'Fzi Â¥Wt Â¥98 - 40*1-,6.: mqui=or *,ELE Â·U--E r 41, fle . 'A.,1.? ,Â¥%. U ~â€¢itEETH'"841pl#MN."Bre--- 1~211~-FaLt--I'. n. 1.//1/gujuil. ~B,Â· e. _ pi-*i- Â£ 8./.f~51~divt"/Mill/Vill.i-94 ''p'p' -, *NNE....v..... I =48.*flililllllill 11Â£9*gR~ituLiml- 2~VE-="I......-I-,I- ~ ABC HaIL . ......r- THESE PHOTOGRAPHS 1-LUSTRATE THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF -Â· i 'll#m*- ' ' , 'D- MATURE VEGETATION SCRFFNING THE GARAGE.ENTRY,AND BUILDING AS A WICI F, AS IT RFI ATES TO ORIENTATION. ASPEN GOIF COURSE 1.~11&1%Â·f, :1' 4 119"6.-='. . ey. 1-1 hl />04.9. P... , .. + i. i,/ r-TT-7 N ./ ./ I 1 43<6 Â¢*W LQI-24 91 i,V \ ....$. - hi . â„¢.-/ .: V>4-- ' LS.W...'90;py<6.Â·t:.-~Â·. ~' ,~~ 01 SITE PLAN - LEGEND f >1, .6. 2 - Â·0' A 4 9 61Â£88&~18** < A. mix ZO- 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RES:,ENTAL DESIGN S-ANCARD VARIANCE REGUEST /Q ~ A 03 1 EX:STING JIOTOS 1 SCALE.AS NOTED 06 15 2015 A~C~*rEC~I < #4 m Â»A" , fl\ \ Â¢ t.' m. 1':, , i \ . T V \\ 1 :- 14\ %\ //1 ' 4,\\ 'illilli 'r ~rm .4 \ A . R-15 - ''Iticticilli~'ll'ff ..,1''.' 7 , I k./' \* 41'U F 1 t. U e - \ H i 1% f . 1 ~f < 4\ 1 -R-15 I i \ I \ 7\\ 6IERRA VISTA . 1 1 11 h/1 NOTE ALLDIMENS,ISAFE ESTNATEC ID ROUNDED OFF TC Â·DE r~EARES,OUENSIONALFCOT THESEESTWTED y ' Â»\ DISTANCES WERE OBTANED FAOM THE Clâ„¢ OF ASPEN OS INTEUCTIVE Vft:aSITE .Qi. ~ 1475 SIERM V~STA DRIVER .00 \ I ~~3MT-QUMENTI- 5/,f ': ./ (nfgER~OR,i-g-v~sol,~sTREETF~wie~.,0~1 3 'rt - j 1 Il RESIDENCES WITH STREET FACINGAGES - . 6, Â· DISTANCE OF STREET FACING GARâ€¢Â£* TO ORB , 2 il~NWI/Imm/Wf#N/Wit/W/1/1/-ki;yarffh--'vs '/,..0,. w ..,7 ..'3-Â·.-rrnÂ·lrill 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STAIDARD Â¥ARIANCE REQUEST ~ A-04 1 BLOCK PLAN 1 SCALE AS NOTED 06 152015 CL ARCHITIC" LQI.,2 ~IA,GRW ILLUSTRATES DRP,ENAYAND VEHICLA-AR REQU~EMENTS [MI/imir,Ming/00(ENâ€ža-]FORA OF THE GAREETOREMA N PER THIS APPLICATION SIDE LOACED GARAGE BASED ON â„¢E EXISTING LOCATION L./1 I 4 2*111/ i \ \ \ 7â‚¬/ ,\ b. En 'ir< .:Â· o~m,c,c<=r,Â«1,-"AnÂ¥â€¢2,inoca~r / .1.m/14511.CPO* - / 1/. / \ 00Â· -- A 0 \ e 1- tâ€¢~ ,, APPRO........12Noll/ESWOUL'llA" ' / - 10.2--.Wre/DRME..ASS.-ED%.E it r - \ /409 LOADE.GAUGE \/4 L'Â· \\\ 1 -7 '11\ '--.' IMM'Â¥'ECE'll'NISIDE.COE'GA~46 ./* EN Câ„¢1~CHIG S.7 0.1 LOT 32 // 'L , -t fA #/lillie*UK [9/1, - 4/YA f Â·A - ..... S.....h ~ Ofy i INf - t\ ..... ........ .0 ga,~51 1 1 iN[IRY W. 1 -[f Em,UNG .' . - 1 ......q . 4NiI]Nit*il . 02 141*P 1 '' K \ 1. 9 1 1 , 1. 1 11 1 1 1 1 OunÂ»;E OF 0RCPOSED _-1 ./.DO'/ 1 ,. ADO') 1 11 - 1 1 V 1 9 1 1--- 1 / i '1 --- / 11 - / 11 6 1 1 11 / 11 / 11 / 1 - ~ ROARING FORK ENGINEERING 1 1 - A# 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST A.06 1 SIDE LOADED GARAGE DIAGRAM SCALE 1/8 â€¢ 1'-0 -Il'-M Ljil ARCÂ»I~Icr. 6Zd *.IRâ„¢ LINE uÂ·r,Wrr.41;N~ _ 1 / 1----9 1 .. THE CnY OF ASPEN PUBLIC NOTICE Â· RE: 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE- RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 7, 2015, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Sister Cities room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Zone 4 Architects on behalf of Allen and Janet Hodges, 306 W. 7th Street, Suite 701, Fort Worth TX, 76102, owners of the property located at 1475 Sierra Vista Drive and legally described as Lot 33, West Aspen Filing 1. The applicant requests residential design standards variances from building orientation, garage location and the front porch requirements associated with the redevelopment of the single family residence. For further information, contact Jennifer Phelan at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2759, jenniferphelan@cityofaspen.com. s/Ryan Walterscheid Chair, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 111 deathsto - 644r .~ 1 I 4,505 1,59 inally lethal Afghanistan ~ , 4) 1 14 ntries and bal 3 111 India ~426 1763 409 632 acks that killed 1662 de each in Nigeria ..~~ 7,512 h just two a ,rt said. Among Groups launching the most attacks: er's attack by 2014: 1,083 894 n on a school led at least 497 453 Tune attack by its on a prison ~013' 42~ E 648 il /F~ nich 670 Shiite 196 Â»217 1 ILErn ~ 6, the prison Islamic State Taliban al-Shabab iest terrorist SOURCE: National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism AP Â·ld since Sept. and Responses to Terrorism to the report. ions point- didn't reflect improvements by the foreign fighters and forming a coJ i violence, the US. and its partners in stamping lition to fight the Islamic State. "We counterterror- out terrorism financing, improv- have made progress," Ambassador, 1 the numbers ing information sharing, impecling Tina Kaidanow said. 6 / *-11- ,Â»111,7.11,Ing,--1.Iiam,ff,21.Jaq.,kNI,Jiqivi-'*UAEÂ¥- - * Â· ...'f'.3.--Ii.........4.-731' -#Ii.4 1.4-1,1 1=â€¢--g -Ii,Iri" I r- 1-Latili--I N# 04*436113-1 â€¢ EFqdP/ABA'mig=~FIE#litti tÂ¢'Â·Â·. - .. 5(4Â·g-yiÂ·ri~: ~ -, 5,4 2 4. . 1 1 6 kâ‚¬'' U, , Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. goa._~,1 01*11/1LUIC The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 22 day of- 6./2.0 , 206-'by ,>49 e,ta SkcA/â‚¬~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: -Janel\[\ (-10] <(i ~* CtÂ¢ d ~'4-1,~ C,ti'L</,4 Notary Public KAREN REED PATTERSON NOTARY PUBUC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #19964002767 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: My Commissioo Expires February 15,2016 â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 deet F AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: / 476 Stâ‚¬râ‚¬X 0198 33 ANL , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: -TleÂ»rui Â·L-1~ 7, @ 4,-20f.1 '20\S- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I,.~*rela GroS- 9 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: v Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting Of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public headng. A photograph of theposted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days pior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage - prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the I ~,:') -.' .. * : 2, f ~-1.-property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of ,,-. ' property owners shall bethose onthe current tax records of Pitkin County asthey '\ . .'f.Â·Â·Â· ~~;-t appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) DICKER INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD COPITO ROBERT SARICK JORDAN L & SHEREEN C 69 WILLIAMS RD 500 HAVEN LN 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR MT ELIZA GREAT FALLS, VA 22066 ASPEN, CO 81611-1045 AUSTRALIA 3930. JSO PARTNERS LLC SCHWARTZ RICHARD C ASPEN GOLF PRO SHOP 1470 SIERRA VISTA DR 1435 SIERRA VISTA DR 299 MILWAUKEE ST #502 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80206-5045 VANDERLIP HENRIK N 1430 SIERRA VISTA LTD 1430 SIERRA VISTA CONDO ASSOC 27 BALDWIN FARMS S 712 MAIN ST 29TH FL 1435 SIERRA VISTA GREENWICH, CT 068313308 HOUSTON, TX 77002 ASPEN, CO 81611 PYRAMID PEAK CONDO ASSOC SIERRA VISTA CONDO ASSOC SIERRA VISTA DUPLEX CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR 1445 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN. CO 81611 SPEN. CO 81611 HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC RED MTN GRILL DUBLIN LEONARD & ADELE COMMON AREA 1000 TRUSCOTT PL 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR 1465 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN. CO 81611 ASPEN. CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 REDNOR JORDAN H SCHNEIDER ELIZABETH P WALBERT DAVID & ELLEN 405 EAST 56TH ST #A 6 LODGE RD 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR NEW YORK, NY 10022 GREAT NECK, NY 11021 ASPEN, CO 81611 ODONNELL JOHN & ADRIENNE BICKERT CARL VON EISEN & E SUSAN GRYNBERG MIRIAM ZELA TRUST 4083 CUERVO AVE 395 DEXTER ST 3600 S YOSEMITE ST STE 900 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93110 DENVER, CO 80202 DENVER, CO 80237 GRYNBERG RACHEL SUSAN TRUST GRYNBERG STEPHAN MARK TRUST CITY OF ASPEN 5000 S QUEBEC STE 500 5000 S QUEBEC STE 500 130 S GALENA ST DENVER, CO 80237 DENVER, CO 80237 ASPEN, CO 81611 CONNER CLAUDE M & IRENE A TRUST PO BOX 38 PALISADE. CO 81526 *Mailings were not sent to "COMMON AREA" addresses as instructed by GIS. ;*yw. 1 ~ + u . ., 11 2 j .... 1 ' 'k .It Â·Â·Â· -* Fle=/ I .114. 7. Lt .D, 1 ..y B -ti-- urlu .~. 1,1=,1 1, 1 ..4, / . 4 1,4 r- i ~'~t ~ ' 2. At U %> - 3- + ...... #.44/ * . IÂ· Â· 0 ./ ..4/L,J: IJ. ' - -I - - W- fe 1.y It 3 - 1* -<47/ .,=P . I . â‚¬ --' .1Â». ~%. -94.. 1 +44 *kir' /'. St /070 +64*, ' .. 4 14,15 .4 . b . 7%4474 I'/4 Â·''h'~iL Ar~/ -- DLL f 2. ./ 7 16)1 % f< . 'IA :'Â· Â· fiÂ·,\Bil â€¢Ab-, ' 2 , ; 44â€¢*- 144.27 4 ' , ' Â· 7 â‚¬/r 4 4.1 1, 1 9 0#'P: .7 -54'- Â· Â· a# : Aft-K73Â¥Btâ€¢~41#-/ ''.. â€¢ i .Al/3.4/Â·' .1 .4-pÂ· 1.Â·t, r 44 *Â·:*'. 4/13.:'Sp4;:fial,9,/jiTZ/g * /. ~'. . Â· 1 '. . i .34- " 12.32 I /42' t. Iii 1 , . 61,99'%#Milyet 891* V, 5 #1 j , , 0.1 1 314 *St, 4 1., , 1 : :J - 7/: :4*Â·4 ,* Â· 11,4Â®$,U 17,5 13,~ . ' :4 . 0 '' ' ..11- Â·, -,- I . .4. .... ~. 6.t Â·7Â·. ..' 'ti .4 /1r- . Mineral Estate Owner Nolice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt reqiiested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision ofthis Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation. or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 9 Â·l. 4 & 4..1 Signature -rA The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /9 day , 2015-,by 3-* FF-11â‚¬1/ M C COZIUAL WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL r--0--- Nus#n Gonzalez Notal,Public My commission @Api~es: /22 -80 -~20/6 State of Colorado r.1 -1~, . C 1 Notary 1D20084043073 Liette,(.~ U-7~, 0 Nota~ Public U 0 1!4 ciw,usdo~19" December 30, af ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENOES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL EST.ATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 EXHIBIT .-/, E--1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: July 07 , 20 15 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, Jeffrey D. McCollum / Zone 4 Architects, LLC (name. please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy (4 the ptiblication is attached hereto. X Posting of notice. By posting of notice. which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 19 day of June , 20 15, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. Aphotograph of the posted notice (sign) is anached hereto. .----1 Â¥.:EV 00 X Mailing Of notice. By the mailing of a notice ~btained-frorli ti~~ommuni Development Department, which contains the itformation *64Â¢ribe*,in Secti 1 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. lt least.fiheen 1~tWiNIprior the public hearing, notice was hand delivered Â°! 141Â£i~Frititth.,ths&, prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property withinkth property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy offhe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood ()tilreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of ciny documentation that was presented m ihe pliblic is attached hereto. (conlimled on next page) 2 72.7~ ..1\ 4 i u 6 j AM /11 'Â·\ rl FLIDILNEE'123 e , \F ; 1 I - I C li \4 1. ., f .% . 1/ I. 1. 4 0 \ J ' b L--11-2111 rA- iA ~ 71 \ -\- 2 reâ‚¬ -,4 01 ENTRY PORCH PERSPECTIVE ~WSTRAT =N DEPICTS THE ENTRY PORCH DESIGN AS CURRENTLY PROPOSED N THIS APPLICAT ON. 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANCARO VARIANCE REQUEST ~ A-14 1 PROPOSED PERSPECTIVES 1 SCALE :N.T.S. 01.15 2016 C II/I!IICII VI.B. 98d ..,- --H ~U-Intit__-1--- 1 ---21-61-4â‚¬226=t- -- -r..f - -49.'ZLJ,- E-N IL-Ut-----IM~~~~~~f:--111-----T-=1-----Â·Â·-n. -9--1 iM-A ' . I , _Ah_111.M 'TO=F-M-I â€ž0-ir....U 1 â‚¬ i - --0 31 + - .11.-9-1 4 ~=1-- - - 1. Â§ i - -"m- .....S,1*OE Â«=4 7 -3+ ,.7 11- - /-2 1/ -- 64 PROPOSED I EAST ELEVATIQL_ _ Ef-I~~53' --~~ ~~~X hu r- b.#~-'-B-##&.-=s~ F -- DS'.6... 1 99t.,.ui., L+MU, 'rrm --Il------li--Il---I---i--Ill-i- - ----Ill-A-W 6-i & 9 -..'Ali. '6 f -25I1!19 1 EAST ELEVATION - _.__ 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DES G N STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST . 6 -- FIZ\LA A-12 EXIST,AG + PROPOSED EAST ELEVATIONS i EXITGTTEE~------- --- 06 15.20 5 AMCHITECTI 98d 11 - 1 lutz -- & 612LU. - ' ~~ 8 1-2 ~,O 0.. *, T. w libE- --- :--,- --, 2-r-7Â·tÂ·29RRKÂ»-1--4-c- Â·-*02 F"-1--~~*L ..-, .-7#/LI ' 1 1 1 12 Li- -Filll 18 I 2----L *A,+ PROPOSED I WEST ELEVATION C>/ -\23 m - \iLL F E-ILE 9 0 n 40\ EXISTING I WEST ELEVATION U I ... . re 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIA ICE REOUEST Firj 4-11 ExIST NG â€¢ PROPOSED WEST ELEVATIONS 1 SCALE . 1/. â€¢ 1'-0. 06Â·5.2015 1...1 L 11 I.C.,TIC'S ted 2 ~1~0~ in '!91,1 1 9 il - 2 / L=111________~ I. j 1 LL n . .1 L. Er-Â·- -- 1.11 [U 1 -- 1 -10-0,1/Â£ - rt-= - ~ LE fil[ - J [3.30 -# 1 CUIL-1 E--32-23 1 r _ :, -- I 4 0-21 -- - ~ --------- 1--; E/li-%3 FrrllIE . , 2 1-7.-IJAUU_V_-ff_ - " -1- -VIr--22.-31-1-JJJ. 4 PROPOSED-INORTHELEYERN 1. ~r -Ea 9,77: 104~ 6~11UU~E1 1-1 n i i [-~]Im ~ Â·------- '-Â·59]~=~~i~~x.zeY#-ink- rioâ€¢,611-/ 1 --*t-1-- L,M-AL.14,1 Â· EXIST I NG 1 NORT H ELEVATION 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIV~ RESIDENCE ~ DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE R_EQUEST ~ ~ - CIL A-10 1 EXISTING + PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATIONS I SCALE :1,4 .1 4 06.15.20,3 A~CHITIOTe 0 Eed m#..0.1,~,41, Icalâ€¢DI,râ€¢IMM Â»inloiD~rrm- P 6.i.-#Il.-D,lie,A 1 f 1, Â· 9 .'35- 0 - 11 .1. 1 1 1 1 1 -!8 -rÂ·-inc I Â· 1 ' 1. . -. ~ 11Â£. 0 ./ %. . -1. a- .01,-1, I 2'2=1 - 2==Im =1.= 1 4 iF- 1 i - 4 N 1 -% 7.Qrul 9- - ,(11.RKr /,1.k - -1 + ZONE 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE R ES,DE N Till DES GN S-ANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST BIO ..g ROPOSED ROOF PLAN 1 SCALE . 1'4Â· = 1Â·Â·0" 06 15 2015 ANCHIT-TI Zed 1 1 - - -4'LU - - 1- ,-~_4_2__: s n~*~ .....,1 11 0 4 -114. 11 1-1,7- A ./ 21] 1 918 !Â» i -Z--- 11 1 0~ -"U~ 1 1 12=* >h- Ul.A -Ler.liÂ· +97&.,-R.U j-2 1-2-6*93= 1 1_ I.-~Lill 1 n 1 __L 1 L 28*Ae- - f .- 'reNE"i 4 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST A-08 I PROPOSED UPPER .EVEL FLOOR PLAN I SCALE : 164Â·= 1-0 :6.15 2013 Cl, Alle HITICT' ted REFER TO PLAN DIAGRAM A-13/014 | . 1. eo,-Enkl,4.Ir/Guâ€¢us.-Â¥a--w ! ' Nesa,%,ge 1 EEmphy 4- 17/ 1 /,lrÂ»LI // \1 -9 -0 111' .- m 0- 3 e- 211 -; =4 ~,U j m Lrtl =j. 4 I . i11 11.Â¥. E-Â«-1 1,1 1 \ 1 i / 37 1 '. 1*2. - 1 \ *- 4 ~ 7.9 5 1 14 1--13-t-]-i--I-~-1 E -- --- m 1 1 1 111Â¢ 111 1 - 11 cgi -..11 p - -- - r w *ts'~iarnt,Â·a ~ ==== lilli 0 Â¥ 1 1 E 19- i ,r o 0 letÂ·.r*TE) _ ...'lillia ....MAIMP 1 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTiAL DES GH ST,NDAND V ARIANCE REOUEST WEJL A-07 1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE : 1/4'â€¢10.0 0615.2015 Qui A~EMITIC ZONE EE ARCHITECTS LLC June 15,2015 Ms. Sara Nadolny City o f Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen. CO 81611 RE: Request for an administrative Residential Design Standards variance for property located at 1475 Sierra Vista Drive. Dear Sara, This is an application to consider an administrative variance exemption for three elements of the proposed design submitted for the project located at 1475 Sierra Vista Drive which is legally described as Subdivision: West Aspen. Lot: 33. Filing: 1. The first element is building orientation, the second is the garage door orientation/setback, and the third is a question regarding whether the proposed front entry porch/canopy con forms to the intent of the code. A brief history of this pro ject is that the current Owners purchased the property in 2013 with the intent to remodel the existing 2 story residence in order to update the existing house, and working to hold to a limited budget. As the project design developed. more and more of the existing structure was subtracted because it was more cost effective to replace old construction with new rather than work around the existing framing, The Owner's fondness for the size and shape of the existing structure meant that they did not need to start from scratch, and they wished to continue utilizing whatever elements possible in order to save money- the most significant element being the foundation and L utilities. In May 2014. an administrative request to move the front door of the garage towards the street was not approved because it was increasing a non-conformity. and the property owners decided not to proceed with the variance any further due to cost and an overall value engineering decision to minimize any disturbances and additional costs. There were discussions with staff about maintaining the existing non-conformity, and staff at the time was supportive of that. Whether thoughts have changed or a mistake was made, we have been directed to apply for an administrative variance for three building elements listed below. 0 26.410.040.A.1), Site Design-Building orientation 0 26.410.040.0.2.b), Front Fagade Garage. o Section 26.410.040.D. 1.b). Front Porch (Interpretation of definition and intent of code provision) ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2508 ASPEN COLORADO 81612 Administrative variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of'he individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance from the residential design standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, 2-fgranted, would: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the comext as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary lo determine if the exception is warranted; or b). Be clearly necessary.for reasons of.jainiess related to 1{111(sital site-specific constraints. The Community Development Director shall provide the Planning and Zoning Commission an annual report of approved administrative variances. Responses to Standards: 26.410.040.A. 1), Site Design-Building orientation The intent of these design standards is to encourage residential buildings that address the street in a manner which creates a consistent "fafade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, where fences or dense landscaping exist or are proposed, it is intended that they be used to define the boundaries ofprivate property without eliminating the visibility of the house and front yard from the street 1. Building orientation. Thefronffacades of all principal structures shall be parallel to tile street. On corner lots, both street-facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets. On cun,ilinear streets, the front facade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street. Parcels as outlined in Subsection 26.410.010.8.4 shall be exempt from this requirement. Context- Diagram A-04 shows that out of out of 25 houses in view within this area, 10 of the houses do not meet the Building orientation standard. including all but one of the houses which are located on the cul-de-sac of Sierra Vista Drive around 1475 Sierra Vista. It is clearly a prevalent condition within the neighborhood to not always have houses align with the specifics of this standard, especially when comparing to the code defined location for the tangent line. Fairness/Site specific constraints- The property owners wish to maintain the existing foundation to save at least $250,000. Ifthe tangent to the cul-de-sac is taken at intersection o f the cul-de-sac and the west property line, the existing building (and thus the proposed design) is parallel to the tangent at that point. Dead end streets function differently than thru streets. where the orientation of the residence changes from a relationship to the street edge (typical condition and how the RDS is written). to a relationship with the center point of the cul-de-sac (which is how the house is currently positioned). Exhibit A-05 shows the code defined tangent vs the tangent taken at the western property line tangent point is included with the application, and is apparent when visiting the site. Per the intent of the code, the current fagade orientation would very much create a consistent faÂ¢ade line if the other houses took the roundness o f the cul-de-sac into consideration and measured tangents relative to the center of the cul-de-sac. ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2508 ASPEN COLORADO 81612 26.410.040.C. Parking, garages and carports. The intent of the following parking, garages und carport standards is to minimize the potential for conflicts between pedestrian und automobile traffic by placing parking, garages and carports on alleys or to minimize the presence ofgarages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, the following standards shall be apply: b) The front facade Of the garage or the front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set back al least ten (10) feetfurtherfrom the street than the front-most wall of the house. Context- Diagram A-()4 shows that out of out of 25 houses in the survey area, 14 of the houses face garage doors towards the street (including all but one of the houses which are located on the cut-de-sac of Sierra Vista drive around 1475 Sierra Vista) and the majority of those houses do not meet the standards o f the garage doors being at least 10 feet behind the front most faqade of the building. One of the reasons for the updates to the RDS that was done in 2005 was because of planning and zoning's frustration with having to spend time reviewing Cemetery Lane garages, and hence why the administrative option was added to the code section (so that Staff could give variances). Relative to the neighborhood context in this area, this configuration is more common than the design standard requirement, and in this case the lot does not easily allow the RDS conditions to be met in their entirety. Fairness/Site specific constraints- The property owners wish to maintain the existing foundation to save approximately $250.000, which means that the house's location is fixed within the site. Regardless o f where the building footprint is located, the options for accessing this property are severely limited because of the pie shaped lot configuration. and exacerbated by the narrow end being located along the street. Specifically. i f the entry moves fonvard so that it complies with the 10 foot setback. the emergency turning area disappears and creates a condition where cars must back into the street. This also significantly changes the footprint area of the residence and effectiz-ely necessitates a new foundation, which places a financial hardship onto the property owners. Even though the lot is larger than 15,000s f it is not possible to modify the design to side load the garage. A vehicular study is illustrated on sheet A-06 which shows that in order for the side loaded configuration to work, the driveway must cross over the property line to meet minimum turning radii ofa standard vehicle. It is also not be possible to face the garage northwest and not create a long list of conformance issues, not least o f which is standard 26. 410.040.D.la. Give that the garage doors are approximately 90 feet away from the edge of pavement (and one o f the furthest houses from the pavement within the obsen-ed area per Sheet A-04), and is heavily screened with trees which will mostly remain (Sheet A-03), the property does not and will not ever comply with the intention of the code because the site constraints do not allow for a typical pedestrian oriented relationship between the street, the house. and vehicular access. ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2508 ASPEN COLORADO 81612 Code Interpretation: Section 26.410.040.D. 1.b), Front Porch The intent of the following building element standards is to ensure that each residential building has street-facing architectural details and elements, which provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience and reinforce local building traditions b) A covered entry porch ofjifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six (6') feet, shall be part of thefront facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one (1) story in height. Response: It is not clear i f it is necessary to consider a variance from the RDS related to the porch/canopy element in this case, or whether a code interpretation is more appropriate. The design as submitted includes a 4 feet of overhang with a 2 foot canopy. Based on the definition of a Porch as being a "unheated AREA under a roof' (see below). it was felt that the combination of the canopy and overhanging area of the second floor met the criteria for Porch, since it was a one story element (the AREA that comprised the porch being only one story tall), and meets the depth and area parameters for the Porch element above. The RDS criterion for the one story element is being met through another element of the fagade (and section 26.410.040.D.2 First story element states that while there may not be accessible space over the first story element- it is NOT precluded to be over "remaining first story elements of the front faqade"- i.e. the porch). The porch area as designed clearly indicates the location of the entry door on the fagade based on the architecture o f the house (3D view attached on Sheet A-14) and meets the intent o f the code to create pedestrian scale. The Residential Design Standards "Purpose" section states. "The standards do not prescribe architectural style, but do require that each home. while serving the needs of its owner. contribute to the streetscape. The proposed design is an example of a contemporary architectural style. and within that architectural language there is an association with forms, such as what is represented in the proposed design, which clearly represents the entry based on the orientation and architectonics of the forms. Advancements in building technology have allowed for architectural expressions which were not commonly seen in Victorian times, however worldwide acceptance and use of the contemporary style of design has clearly established alternate forms of expression for traditional residential components. An alternate design has also been presented on Sheet A-13 which extends the Canopy itsel f to be 6 feet deep, which would meet the standard by itself (without the addition of the depth of the 2nd floor overhang included). The code does not state or imply that a canopy element that meets the letter o f the code cannot be attached/associated with an additional overhanging mass, but simply requires that a pedestrian scale element is provided which demarcates an entry that conforms to certain dimensional specifications. Zone 4 would be willing to amend the design to expand the canopy i f it were felt that by doing so. the standard would be more clearly met. Definitions from- 26.104.100. Definitions. Canopy. A roof-like cover that projects more than.fire (5) feer from the wall of a building. Porch. An tininsulated, unheated area under a roof, enclosed on at least one side by an exterior wall of a bitilding and open on at least two sides to the outdoors, with or without screens. ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS PO BOX 2508 ASPEN COLORADO 81612 CITY ur ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Sara Nadolny, 970.429.2739 DATE: 6/5/2015 PROJECT: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive REPRESENTATIVE: Dylan Johns & Bill Pollock (Zone 4 Architects) - 970.948.6787 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Residential Design Standard Variance DESCRIPTION: The project representatives have submitted an application to remodel the property at 1475 Sierra Vista Dr, Recent Zoning review has indicated a couple of non-conforming conditions that must be address prior to the review moving forward. The renovation of the existing home demolishes more than 40% of the existing structure; therefore any existing non-conformities will require a Residential Design Standard variance to be maintained. The project reps have indicated a desire to maintain two existing non-conformities: 1 Building Orientiation. The current building's footprint will be maintained and increased as a result of this redevelopment. The current building is not entirely parallel to the street. 2. Garage doors. The current configuration has the garage forward of the front-most wall of the house, and street-facing. This portion of the existing structure is not proposed to be demolished. The project may require a third Residential Design Standard variance related to the front porch. An applicant may request up to three variances to be reviewed administratively. An application requesting Residential Design Standard variances must be found to either: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b) Be clearly necessary for reasons related to unusual site-specific constraints. These criteria must be answered and are found in Section 26.410.020.D.1, as stated below. The project reps have requested this application be reviewed administratively. Below is a link to the Land Use Application Form for your convenience: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/AppsÂ°/020and%20Fees/2011 %20land%20use %20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures ASLU RDS Variance 1475 Sierra Vista Dr. 273511105006 1 26.410 Residential Design Standards ' 26.410.020.D.1 Variances 26.710.050 Moderate-Density Residential (R-15) http://www.as pen pitki n.com/Depa rtments/Com m u nity-Development/Planning-and-Zon i nq/Title- 26-Land-Use-Code/ Review by: 1) Community Development Staff for complete application and administrative determination Public Hearing: None at this time - may update this application to reflect a public hearing before P&Z should the administrative review be denied, and the applicants wish to pursue this avenue. Planning Fees: $650 - flat fee for administrative Residential Design Variance review Referral Fees: None. Total Deposit: $650 Total Number of Application Copies: 2 Copies Includes appropriate drawing for board review (HPC = 12; PZ = 10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff = 2) To apply, submit the following information: Â¤ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Il Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Il Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. m Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. Â£ HOA Compliance form (Attached) m A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. 2 ' C] A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. U Written responses to all review criteria. U An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. C] 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: D 1 additional copy of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. U Total deposit for review of the application. U A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 00 ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION Pit().IE( 1: Name: /475 5116 Â«* \hyrA D..,4. RÂ»,PTÂ·{cl- <5,5-~ V;yr-A K*.~*=84- Location: /+~153 61<R,h v,er, 1>*vi. 9 \J, sr Aga4,1-,r: 32â€¢ 7 u.,46- L Undicate street address, lot & block number. legal description whdre appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) a.715-/1105(DOG API'll(AN 1 : Name: 14Â· * d.5. ALÂ·Â·646.< ROD,-22) Address: 306 MI -1#~ Jr 0 701, -A<-r \4.rÂ».77( -16/02. Phone# (8/7) 877- 4646 RECEIVED REPRESENTATAT: Name: 1Â°45 4 /4'40 'rio,1, i-,-c .1[JN 1 b ?014 Address: F.O. 2>of as-08 ; Pf3,1~â€¢~ , CO R/61 24 CITY OF ASPEN Phone #: (974 449 . 9410 to&%11!Nlp' DE' 0=!OPMEN) TYPE OF APPI.Ic =\TION: (please check all that apply) GMOS Exemption U Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes ~1 Final SPA (& SPA Margin. Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review Il Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Exp ansion [0'~ Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: El Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) **, 5-r,4,- 5,4661-*T.*&-7 K~*ID'** *rA Ac>H- Coll'Â©%1'41"- Bu,Lzâ€ž4.-- D N 84.rwr-/0,1 ,Â® 6-Ki,612- De#(*) L-6DA,-/e~V. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) P'"0*6 Â·e,arWâ€¢ 5,4-1-PwAY RÂ»t'De'*2- 7~41 1â€¢,AU,WINE- -2.,5r,Ad, A#6,4Â¥0A1,r{6- 1&tâ€¢,6.bmb- MeleNTATIO~ AAD 6-Ate- DtbAR)6-bcâ€¢TmrtÂ· RÂ»4065714â‚¬r *WTâ€¢N Po*LA :Di*,6.1 \hoUAAca- . Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S 650.00 U Pre-Application Conference Summary U Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Diniensional Requirements Form El Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review~ Standards 1 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be fulded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. 0000 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: t+75 5,044 467-A Dâ‚¬w/. AES,10+1. ~,EAM,6 v67* R:â€¢10)04- Applicant: ,â€¢01.. - /*S, Aw_.4 P.Dees. ~ 10*~ 4 A *â€¢4 ,~r-9â‚¬76 : us.<. Location: 1473 3/*Ag. V,sT. , A.tri-/ , 60 8/6/ / j Wit,- Ap:4 t J-07-: 11, "A.,46- 3- Zone District: A-,S- Lot Size: /6,00* 3.PÂ· Lot Area: /4/ 00 2 5.R (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area. Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark. easeinents, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable Existing.' Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3 Proposed: 6 Proposed To of demolition (Historic properties only) DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 3580.74!l/0 M'able. 4560 s.w p d: 43-6-1.6 6.7. Principal bldg. height: Existing: SA2' Allowable: 25' Prop(,sed 047' Access. bldg. height: Existing. Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: /Cris/ing: Reqi,ired: Piw,posed: % Site coverage: Existing /7. *70 Re quired: Proposed.-Akk % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: 2 S-' Required. 25' Proposed: 25' Rear Setback: Existing: /0' Required: '04 Proposed: 10' Combined F/R: Existing.- Required: Proposed: Side Setback.* Existing: k' Required: /0 ' Proposed: /0' Side Setback: Existing: /O' Required: /0' Proposed: /O' Combined Sides: Exi.ving. Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Reg iii reel: Propo.sed: Buildings Existing non-conformities 01- enci-oachinents: 404-/Le,â€¢~POBri,47 Au/â€¢Â·â€¢CÂ¥44- Os/80Â»17-Aâ€ž/ 4/Â·P GrAFA&-& DROKÂ») A-e,CAT/O-~. Variations requested: rl#,M,-A,/ ,*GW- ':09'*0*71/7-25 (ver,i> /1801,â‚¬),INI) g-Querr /,T#>f' re>Ace Â·pid,Â£_' **&4(8-- Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Phone No.: 8/7Â· 871Â· 46Â¥6 ther â€¢ 1 0 Owner El"): 4,-i â€¢1' hop e.* s Email: ARODeÂ·EA â‚¬ ittbaâ€¢S SCO.t/*f Address of Billing 340 5/*47* 7*2 5,-*Ser *70 l Property: /4 75' 5/22< AA' 06'174 2,14/ZE. Address: 710 rr \0~Â©trHÂ·,TX 76161 (subject of A6193â€¢~ , CO 59/6// (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that 1 am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: ] agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ 6 50 * flatfee for g P.S 954 g/,4,460-7 $ flat fee for $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for i For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, il is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application, I understand that additional costs over and above tile deposit may accrue, I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The Cjty and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed biliing address and riot returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me, I agree to emit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee POIiCy including consequences for non-payment. i agree to pay the following Initial deposit amounts for Ihe specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the Initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. $ N<A deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Prope[ly Owner: CONâ‚¬/U / 4 Chris Bendon Community Development Director Naar. A=64 *606167 City Use: W= Title: 0/NE,Ad /*75* 1/*Â«A MM,- -*n Fees Due: $ Received: $ -J November. 2011 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 CITY O COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 } 1 Â©4 - PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, 3rd Floor ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970-925-1766 I 970.925-6527 FAX December), 2013 Janet and L. Allen Hodges III 306 W. 7th St., Suite 701 Fort Worth, TX 76102 RE: PCT23841*3 - LOT 33, WEST ASPEN, FILING 1 Pitkin County Title, Inc. is pleased to provide you with the owners policy along with the following endorsements relative to the above mentioned file Endorsement Form 110.1 Please review the policy in its entirety. We at Pitkin County Title, Inc. believe in providing you, our customer, with a quality product which will serve your needs. In the event you do find a discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact us and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. We have assigned the above number to your records to assure prompt processing of future title orders involving the property. If you sell or obtain a loan on this property within 5 years, ask your broker or agent to contact our office to ensure re-ssue rates whjch may be available to you. Thank you very much for giving Pitkin County Tit[e, Inc. the opportunity to serve you. Sincerely, /9 Tom Twitchell RECEIVED Enclosures: JUN 1 6 2015 CITY OF ASPEN COMM!.NITY DEVELOPMENT , hA, r#' WESTCOR POLICY NO. r >0=k- LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OP-6-001045-3369577 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (6-17-06) ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S POLICY OFTITLE INSURANCE Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in Section 18 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO TI-IE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B, AND THE CONDITIONS, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation (the "Company") insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after ])ate of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, su.stained or incurred by the Insured by reason of: 1. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A. 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title. This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (i) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (ii) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (iii) a document affecting Title not properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (iv) failure to perfonn those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law; (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of' attorney: (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vii) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority : due or payable, but unpaid. (c) Any encroachment, encum,brance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land, The terIn "encroachment' includes encroachments of eisting improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments ont:o the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. COVERED RISKS Continued on next page IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused t.liis policy to be signed and sealed as of the Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, - Issued By: WESTCOR LANI) TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CO1045*PCT23841W Pitkin County Title Inc. 4~134 By: 24*~1 0 PEÂ«44 i 601 E. Hopkins #3 f# 03%Â°2 1~ jresident ./7 Aspen, CO 81611 4 6 Con:panv B 4 d U %4%,~:0_/07 41,â€ž0 Attest: 5 1 i Secretaly OP-6 ALIA 6-17-06 Owner's Policy (WLTIC Edition 2-25-08) 4. No right of access to and from the Land. , 5. The violation or enforce.ment ofany law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision of land; or (d) environmental protection if a notice. describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a not,ice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7, The exercise ofthe rights of eminentdomain if a notice ofthe exercise, describing any part ofthe Land, is recorded in the Public Records. 8. Any taking bya governmental body that has occurred and is binding onthe rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge, 9. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A or being defective (a) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of' a transfer of all or any part of the title to or any interest iii the Land occurring prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A con stitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording iii the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (ii) to impart notf ce of its existence to a purcha.ser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor. 10.Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Re- ofthis policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, cords at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: and not disclosed iii writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became ali 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation Insured under this policy; (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claiinant; (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date offolicy (however. this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under (ii) the character, dimensions, or location ofany improve- Covered Risk 9 and ]0), or 11161.it erected on the Land. (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been (iii) the subdivision of land; or sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation Title, of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations, This Exclusion 1 (a) does not modify or limit the cover- 4. Any claim. by reason ofthe operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction age provided under Covered Risk 5. vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (b) Any governmental policepower. This Exclusion 1(b) does (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated iii Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 5. Any lienon the Title forrealestate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between 3. Defects, liens, enctimbrances, adverse claims, or other mat- Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other ters instrument of transfer iii the Public Records that vests Title as (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured shown in Schedule A. Claimant; CONDITIONS AND ST]PULATIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS without Knowledge, With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public , Records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed The following terms when used in this policy mean: in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court (a) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as for the district where the Land is located. may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, (j) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. increased by Section 8(b), or decreased by Sections 10 and 11 of these Conditions. 00 "Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or iessee of (b) "Date of Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy" in the Title or lender on the Title to be released from the obligation Schedule A to purchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition (c) "Entity": A corporation, partnerghip, trust, limited liability requiring the delivery of marketable title. company, or other similar legal entity. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE (d) "Insured ': The Insured named in Schedule A. The coverage o f this policy shall continue in force as of Date of (i) The term "Insured" also includes Policy in favor ofan Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, purchase money M.ortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason of war- ofkin; ranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title. This policy shall 03) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, con. not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the insured solidation, distribution, or reorganization; of either (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. (C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Utility: 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED (D) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without CLAIMANT payment of actual valuable consideration conveying The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in the Title case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Condi- (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity tions, (ii) in case Knowledge shall come to an Insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest that is adverse to the Title, as insured, interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by the and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may named Insured, be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if the Title, as insured. is (2) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, rejected as Unmarketable Title. If the Company is prejudiced by (3) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an affiliated the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the Entity of the named Insured, provided the affiliated Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the policy shall Entity and the named Insured are both wholly- be reduced to the extent of the prejudice owned by the same person or Entity, or 4. PROOF OF LOSS (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by the Iii the event the Company is unable to determine the amount of loss Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition ofpayment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proof ofloss, purposes, The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or (ii) With regard to (A), (13), (C), and (D) reserving, however. all other matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis would have had against any predecessor Insured. of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. (e) "Insured Claimant". An Insured claiming loss or damage, 5. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS (f) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, not construe- tive knowledge or notice that maybe iniputed to an Insured by (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. the defense of an Insured in litigation iii which any third party (g) "Land": The land described in Schedule A, and affixed iniprove- asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. ments that by law constititte real property. The term "Land" This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action does not include any property beyond the lines of the area alleging matters insured against by this policy The Company described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The (h) 'Mortgage": Mortgage, deed oftrust, trust deed, or other secu- Company will not pay any fees, costs. or expenses incurred by rity instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege authorized by law, matters not insured against by thi s policy. (i) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice contained iii Section 7 ofthes= Conditions, at its own cost, to of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS - CONTINUED establish the Title, as insured. or to prevent or reduce loss or policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses in- damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropri- curred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Com- ate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall pany up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the be liable to the Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not Company is obligated to pay. be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this Upon the exercise by the Company ofthis option, allliability and policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsec- obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy, other tion, it must do so diligently. than to make the payment required in this subsection, shall termi- (c) Whenever the Company brings an action or asserts a defense as Rate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue continue any litigation. the litigation to a linal determination by a court of competent (b) To Payor Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Insured jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole dis- or With the Insured Claimant. cretion, to appeal any adverse judgment or order. (i) To pay or othenvise settle with other parties for or in the 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against under this policy In addition, the Company will pay any (a) In ali cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured prosecute or provide for the defense of any action orproceeding Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or pro- time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay; or ceeding, including the right to use, at its option. the name of the Insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, (ii) To pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with all reasonable aid (i) iii securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up settlement, and (ii) iii any other lawful act that in the opinion to the time ofpayment and that the Company is obligated of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish to pay the Title or any other matter as insured. If the Company is Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to furnish the required for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the CompanyÂ°s obligations to the cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under Insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. litigation. (b) The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representa- 8. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY tive ofthe Company and to produ.ce forexamination, inspection, This policy is a contractofindemnity against actual monetary loss and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has designated by the authorized representative of the Company, suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, this policy. ledgers, checks, memoranda, correspondence, reports, e-mails. (a) The extent ofliability ofthe Company forloss or damage under disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after this policy shall not exceed the lesser of Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the (i) the Amount of Insurance; or Conipany, the Insured Claimant shall giant its permission, in (ii) the di fference between the value of the Title as insured and writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to the value of the Title subject to the risk insured against by examine, inspect, and copy all of these records in the custody or this policy. control of athird party that reasonably pertain to the loss or dam- age. All information designated as confidential by the Insured (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall insured. not be disclosed to others unless. in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration ofthe claim. (i) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examination under (ii) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss oath, produce any reasonably requested information, or grant or damage determined either as of the date the claim was permission to secure reasonably necessary information from made by the Insured Claimant or as of the date it is settled third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibited by and paid. law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of (c) In addition to the extent ofliability under (a) and (b), the Com- the Company under this policy as to that claim. pany will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE incuned in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of these Condi- CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY tions. Iii case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the 9.1.IMITATION OF LIABILITY following additional options: (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right ofac- To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Insurance under this cess to or from the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable Title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other method, including litigation and the completion ofany appeals, persons. Arbitrable matters may include, but.are not limited to, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured . matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connection the Insured, with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision. or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Coin- pany or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final detei-- mination by a court of conipetent jurisdiction, and disposition Company or the Insured, All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of 92,000,000 shall be arbitrated only of all appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured. when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in set- the parties. Judgment upon the award rendkred by the Arbitrator(s) tling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the may be entered in any court ofcompetent jurisdiction. Company. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR ENTIRE CONTRACT rERMINArION OF LIABILITY (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached to All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, it by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the attorneys' fees, and expenses, shall reduce the Amount of Insurance Insured and the Company, In interpreting any provision ofthis by the amount of the payment. policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE (b) Any claim of loss or damage that arises out of the status of the Title or by any action asserting such claim shall be restricted The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the to this policy, Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the Insured has agreed, (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in assumed, or taken subject, or which is executed by an Insured after writing and authenticated by an authorized person, or expressly Date of Policy and which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to the Ihsured under (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a this policy. part ofthis policy and is subject to all of its terms and provi- 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS sions. Except as the endorsement expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) When liability and the extent of loss or damage have been defi nitely modify any prior endorsement. (iii) extend the Date of Policy, fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. made within 30 daysi 16. SEVERABILITY 13. RIGHTS OF R.ECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT In the event any provision ofthis policy, in whole or iii part. is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be invalid, under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the but all other provisions shall remain iii full force and effect. rights of the Insured Claimant iii the Title and all other rights and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM has against any person or properly, to the extent of the amount (a) Choice of Law: The Insured acknowledges the Company has of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the underwritten the risks covered by this policy and detennined Company. Ifrequestedby the Company, the Insured Claimant thepremium charged therefor in reliance upon the law affecting shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Com- interests in real property and applicable to the interpretation, pany of these rights and remedies. The hisured Claimant shall rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance pei-mit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle iii the name of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insuied Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights Therefore, the Court or all arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Landis located to determine the validity and remedies. of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to If a payment on account o f a claim does not fully cover the loss interpret and enforce the tenns of this policy Iii neither case of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have to determine the applicable law. recovered its loss. (b) Choice of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the by the Insured against the Company must be filed only iii a Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies ofinsurance, state or federal court within the United States of America or its or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained territories having appropriate jurisdiction. iii those instruments that address subrogation rights. 18. NOTICES, WHERE SENT 14. ARBITRATION Any notice of claim and any other notice or stateinent in writing Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or required to be given to the Company under this policy must be controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title given to the Company at: Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Lai.id Title Associa- Attn.: Claims. 201 N. New York Ave., Ste. 200, Winter Park, tion ("Rules"). Except as provided in the Rules, there shall be Florida 32789, , Obligatory Insurance Fraud Statel : We are obligated by Colorado Law (CRS 10-1-128) to provide the following statement: It is unlawful to kiiowingly provide false, incomplete or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial or insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete or misleading facts or information to a policy holder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attenipting to defratid the policy holder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds s}iall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance - Schedule A Issued by Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Westcor Land Title Insurance Company, 201 N. New York Avenue, Suite 200, Winter Park, Florida, 32789 State: CO County: PITKIN Address Reference: 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE, ASPEN, CO 81611 File No.: PCT23841W3 Policy No,: OP-6-CO1045-3369577 Amount of Insurance: $3,255,000.00 Premium: $ 5,806.00 Date of Policy: October 30, 2013 @ 10:33 AM Simultaneous #: LP-13-CO1045-3369578 Reinsurance #: 13-1163 1. Name of Insured: L. ALLEN HODGES Ill AND JANET S. HODGES 2. The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. Title is vested in: L. ALLEN H O DG ES 111 AN D JANET S. HODGES 4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: LOT 33, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 1, according to the Plat thereof recorded September 5, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 252. Issued By / Authorized Signatory SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT23841W3 October 30, 2013 @ 10:33 AM OP-6-CO1045-3369577 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, thereof, 2. Easements, liens, encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 3, Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land, and that Ts not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, imposed by law for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, which lien, or right to a lien. is not shown by the public records, 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims, (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water(see additional information page regarding water rights), whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown for the public records, 6. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result In taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings1 whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records 7. Any service, installation, connection, majntenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal or other utilities unless shown as an existing lien by the public records. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 8. Taxes and assessments (not including condominium or homeowners association assessments or dues) for the year 2013 and subsequent years only, a lien not yet due and payable, 9. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at Page 33. 10. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded in Plat Book 3 at Page 252. 11. Encroachments by the 1) driveway onto the 5 foot underground utility easement and 2) fence extending outside of lot line on the North, East and South sides and 3) yard extending outside of lot line, on North side, onto right of way and 4) yard, planters, stone wall and railroad tie wall extending outside of lot line, on South side, onto Aspen Golf Course and 5) planter and deck onto 10 foot underground utility easement and 6) mechanical shed onto 10 foot underground utility easement as now located on said property as shown on Survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated October 21, 2011, as Job No. 41280. 12. Deed of Trust from L. ALLEN H O DG E S 111 AN D JANET S. HODGES To the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN For the use of : WELLS FARGO BANK, NA Original Amount : $ $2,441,250.00 Dated : OCTOBER 30, 2013 Recorded : OCTOBER 30, 2013 in Book at Page Reception No. :605198 EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1 THRU 7 ARE HEREBY DELETED, EXCEPT FOR SUBSECTION (d) UNDER PARAGRAPH NUMBER 5 (WATER RIGHTS). Obligatory Insurance Fraud Statement: We are obligated by Colorado Law (CRS 10-1-128) to provide the following statement: It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defi'auding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial or insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false. incomplete or misleading facts or information to a policy holder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policy holder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division o f Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. RECEPTION# 197, 10/30/2013 at 10:32:46 AM, 1 OF 3, R $21.00 DF $325.50 Doc Code WD Documentary Fee $ 325.50 Janice Kâ€ž Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this 25th day of October, 2013, Between THE JONATHAN W. STOLLER REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 5/18/88 AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST and JOHN HERBERT HAMSHER AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST of the County of LOS ANGELES, State of CALIFORNIA, GRANTOR, AND L. ALLEN HODGES Ill and JANET S. HODGES, GRANTEE whose legal address is . 306 W. 7TH STREET, SUITE 701, FORT WORTH, TX 76102 of the County of TARRANT, State of TEXAS WITNESSETH, That for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the grantor has granted, bargained,sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey and confirm unto the grantee, their heirs and assigns forever, all the real property together with improvements, if any, situate and lying and being in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO, described as follows: LOT 33, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 1, according to the Plat thereof recorded September 5,1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 252. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, their heirs and assigns forever. And the Grantor, for themselves, their successors, heirs and assigns, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the Grantee, their heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, they are well seized of the premises above conveyed, -has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever,except those matters as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, their heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has executed this deed. SIGNATURES ON PAGE 2 CITY OF: ASPEN CITY OF ABPEN V~METT PAM:) DATE , RE,jLMO. 463-967 HAE[T RAID 10/30 ll-b c 0 1301\% k30.4693 1 DATE "Â£Â© SIGNATURE PAGE TO WARRANTY DEED PAGE 2 THE JONATHAN W. STOLLER REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 5/18/88 By '4 , CK (*v- - - Jonath*OW. Stoller, Trustee AL A "h n al" 1 1.-*1 1 U 2Â£2 -10& I tNt ., C. u~ 0/ 1 6 1!Nh---&41 221.-1.te?41101&- JOHpAERBERT HAUSHER ' t STATE OF COLORADO ) SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before methis-&.) day of October, 2013, by JONATHAN W. STOLLER, TRUSTEE OF THE JONATHAN W. STOLLER REVOCABL-E TRUST r DATED 5/18/88 and JOHN HERBERT HAMSHER. WITNESS my hand and official seal uk~-~ 1-4 colk# my commission expires --Â·~'1 -\ lo - 1 (.4 9 tary Public i i Â· ,-5*sr.#4 L ~ 2.14?>20'0~:.f/u 2/ gÂ·me r i rÂ«-44 90 4 h X BvioN / 4..,....5* PCT23841\N3 301'rt s,Â·+ 4.2.5434 EXHIBIT "A" 1. Taxes for the year 2013, and subsequent years not yet due or payable. 2. Right of the proprietor of a vein or jade to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at Page 33. 3, Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded in Plat Book 3 at Page 252. 4. Encroachments bythe 1) driveway onto the 5 foot underground utility easement and 2) fence extending outside of lot line on the North, East and South sides and 3) yard extending outside of lot line, on North side, onto right of way and 4) yard, planters, stone wall aid railroad tie wall extending outside of lot line, on South side, onto Aspen Golf Course and 5) planter and deck onto 10 foot underground utility easement and 6) mechanical shed onto 10 foot underground utility easement as now located on said property as shown on Survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc, dated October 21, 2011, as Job No. 41280. June 09, 2015 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, Brd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive To Whom it May Concern: Zone 4 Architects IPO Box 2508, Aspen, CO, 81612; 970-429-8470] has the authorization of Mr. & Mrs. Allen Hodges, the property Owner, to meet with City of Aspen officials as well as submit any required land use applications, permit applications, and change orders forthe sole purpose of remodeling the existing residence and property currently designated by the address 1475 Sierra Vista Drive in Aspen, Colorado and havinga Parcel ID#273511105006. Sincerely, M r.vAlltri/1-&6,kes th 306 West 7 Street, #701 6/' Fort Worth, TX 76102 (817)877-4646, Ext. 100 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: A.661,4 No,681 Property Owner ("1") Email: AtiOZ*125 8 #ODGÂ¥=SCO .HEr Phone No. 47-877 - 4446 le,er. BÂ» Address of 14.75- S,veR. 016Â·rA Dâ€¢,JIE= Property: (subject of 8/c/1 application) I certify *jollows: (pick one) '~~, This property js not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. Q This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. 2 This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this dow'arnt is a public *ailment. u_-/ date: LQ-1 0- 13 Owner signature: Owner printed name: L. AlkA) 14,3Â»-- 04 Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: VICINITY MAP I N.T.s. '24. t... f 4 8, 01> :1.5 -el , B Aspel 4\4 B Mudows w Re 50't SIERRA 4/9 - i: 4 141 , 1 Red B.Itte C e Telery 01 + 182) 2 .1 *+ 40: 1 L ;1.16 -i 11 },2 ' '4 C ID ' :' : / I PROJECT SITE - Â· +.f . I82! 3..L r~*, , I (821 -=. 1.1 1 1 27 A5pe 11,<~:Men Nlarolt Mui Mining & m 0321 - 1121['Cling Musecrn ain r. # *. 6 M e .4 -- r. uen ltigh (.82) School ; - H 0 A r .- -- Wheel P- 0 M D Jts I Vallev Ilosoital rTE-1 Opera I lol.se Project Site: 1475 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 "tr i j,ic#, ~21. :Â·a\U~ .3 - - IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT HATCH LEGEND LINE TYPE LEGEND LOT 33, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING NO. 1 E[ FerRIC 1,]NF ACCORDING TO THE THE PLAT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5,1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 252 ASPHALT CARI.F rF[.FV[SION r CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO El GAS ./. CONCRETE TE' El)11/NE LINE - 1- FACF 1.INF ' 1 12*el (40&1*0'.*t~ GOL, - â€¢SE~- Rl~*EN~*0 \ 29'll"/1 ~ FLA<,SToNE SYMBOLLEGEND e. 3 PAVIÂ·Its Itt./.1-IRN' MFrER 11 ACONTROL#11 1 7 ) f V e y i '44< m OVI KHANG .8#.R Â¤ 0 SIU] ELIÂ· VATION . 00. 4 7.. 6- -4 Ja S.159 . 1 :Â· A COA CONâ„¢OL LVERKING]R ~ -*MICK FIRE HYDRANT W WOOD POST O CEMETERY L.N. & 33: & 1,m~.64,20 9 <12 Â».'Â· ..Â·Â· Â·Â· : u 'G! MAII BOX - a w.%=:Airm W\ 1,01' ASPHALT (TY,) 94 0- 1 M .:Ill .,.....4 / f 7,0 - .\ , 0% VICINITY MAP -/12 \\ At CEIVED W ~1 TREE TYPE ITRUNK ILA. DRIP DIA. BASE ELEK o E- TELF.- Elm. E-90 E TRI E CHART SCALE: 1. = 1500 PUD. \43 \ 4 Et.... I DerIUOUSK' 12" 24 71191 1 1 â„¢ANisj/ix / . 7.17 0 I CON'... 2 ./.IFER 30 78.I #5 REBAR & C AP JUN 2 4 2015 IS â€¢61Â¢68 - HM 240' 33 Dit ]DliCS 6 0 7%~*.5 4 DECIDUOUS 6 13 7,8 4 Al,7%5169' ~ ~ IREBAR AC\120 4 Cl 6 1/FC]DUOLS !4 7%~7 7 - CONIFIER !0 . 78,7.3 CITY OF ASPEN C~MAH 8 DECIDUOI S . 24 7857.9 6 1.- 4 . 7 -- T .NITY DEVED).4MENT INÂ° !0 DECIDLOLS 4 24 7- 11 ./.CID'Ot S 14 24 ..6 12 DECID,jOUS 14 24 7/71 8 DE'[DCOLS/4 14 24 78,7.% GRAPHIC SCALE 15 DECIDUIL S 14 27 7857 9 #40 48 I. DECID/0, 8 16 7857 7 16 DE'&01- SX. 4 24 78/. -7~9 +_~ 18 CONIFER 34 *~ 78~74 17 DECIDL OL S 14 24 78~7 7 (mnET) 20 DECID//Â·' 2Â· 34 78. 2 - 7.3, j 1 *nch - 10 #t . DECID'Ill ' 24 7857 2 19 CONIER 24 40 7%. ' K J 22 DECIDIAS 20 30 7897.~ H[.'UX':BAc.IC - T-3 \ \. *\ 1 . DECIDt Ot % 20 . 7*. ' 24 CONIFER*1 ... 24 DECIDCOLS 20 30 7.97' // ./ 21 26 DIC[DUOUS:2 12 N ./. 27 DE "C OUS>2 12 24 78164 1 /5 .:BAR & A.IM PRÂ«)PE RTY DESCRIPTION: . DECID~ OUS 12 24 78561 7. 1 1 CAP].97* 29 DECIDC. 7H564 / ' 44 1 01Â·13. ~,1 M I ASPI N W EMISI%,11.ING NO. 1. ACCORD]N(, TO THE l'Ht Pl Al RiÂ·,CORDED I OF('11)l OCS I ' 24 â„¢64 10"4 / CLAUDE M & 114! NE A O SEPTEMBER 5, 141.7 IN PLAT Book 1 Al PAGE 2 52. (Â·InÂ· OFÂ· ANPEN. C{I'Nn OF PITKIN. STATE 31 DE.ell}l ICS .4 .856 4 CONNLit 1 .ST I OE CO[ ORA[)0 32 OF'-111 OUS 78--4 Pe BOX 45 1 1, n CON[FER 24- 40 78. 2 4511 N C'081612 34 DE'Â·11)001% . 28 7..4 / 19 DE.CIDUK,9 14 28 7855.8 / 'st. \ 111 - NOTESÂ· 36 M 10*OUSX] 14 21, 7893.7 37 COM,1.14 24 40 78..H FFN('T ,/ 1 . 38 DI,nOUOI S 14 2 ... 1 3, 1 ) THIS PROPER]'1 IS SUBJECT TO RES,Â·RVATIC) R]CTIONS COVENANTS. BLILIMNG (rEl'j 1 .1 4 SliTBACKS AND I ASEMENTS {}F ki.CORD ' }R - ,â€¢D. IONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN / DECÂ·IDU)LISXZ 8 34 78ff 5 . 1, 1 rHE TH L} COMM[IMFN [ PRI-PARM) HY 1'11 KIN l ol iN I Â¥ 1 0 L. . .0 /-113/41/3 DAITI> 40 DFC]DUOL S 14 . 78.4 (TYP.) 9 1 -I EFFEel]Vi{XÂ·11 )HER I.2011 4, Df CID'OrS 14 28 781.'.6 61 i 42 DECIDLOUS . 28 ". 8 ASPHALT 9 FENCE 2, 1 HE DA 1, (* 1 H IS St'RV IA I AS JAâ€¢,UAR' 29. 2014 "D 'l NE 12. 20,5 // *. \ - 4 1% 3) BAS]S ( * 111.ARI A<.% iÂ·OR 1 HI S SURV EÂ¥ IS A HEARI NG 01Â· S ] 3Â°04Â·41 -1 8, 1-WEEN THI 44 DECIDEOUS 4 28 7Â£7 41 DECIDCOUS 14" . 785" ITY" // 0 NORrIII.AS I CORNER OF 1.01 1, A /, RI.BAR FOU ND 1,~ PLACE AND 1111â‚¬ ANGLE POITI ON [ HI: 45 DE, 11)UOUS :4 28 ".6 .1 /1 445 EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF L(Yr 33 A #5 REBAR 14)1ND IN PLACE . CONIFF.R 18 28 7855 0 47 {1}â€¢.Ill* 10 40 7819 7 4,I NITS {* MEASt'RE FOR Al 1 DIMENSIONS SHO~ N HEREON IS U S SURVEV FEET ..ANG} 24 . DECIDLOUS !4'' 28 7.5.0 / 51 â„¢1S SLRVEY IS BASED ON 1 Ht WEST ASPEN SL IDIVISION, FILING NO I PLAT RECORDED 49 (IN/2 8Â· 24 7847 / SFPrEMBER i I 967 IN PLAT BOOK 2 AT PAGE 252 D. THF PIT-Kll Cot'In CLERK AND . DEC[DCOUS 24 78.4 7 6/ I./. 6 EL-71Â¢58 44' . i '1 1, RECORI*R'S 01Â·FICE AND COR NERS FOUND IN PLACF DECIDUOUS 1. 34 ". 1 , M . 1 78/ 1 p / ~ 92 DECIDUOUS*2 0- 10 71Â¢.9 61 ELEVA 1'1(,NS ARE BAS]-1) IN THIÂ·. MESA COUNTY RTVRN NE IWORK (COMI' (]988 8.11 M. ORTHO, Â¥,H DING AN ON.'4, I I FLEVAT10N (* 71Â¢53 69'ON NORrl,Wi '4TE RLY COR,~1Â·R A'~ EVER FLANGI ::4. 1 5011 ~ SllOWN 54 DECIDUOU I R 36 7855.1 55 DECIDIOU 24 7854 7 --- 1 EL-7838.37 I THI RM W AS APPROX[MA 11 I , 30" OF SNOU AND 1/1- ON THI GR(AJAD AT THI [IME 01 56 DECIDLIS 24 ..7 SCRV. 57 CONIFER 0 20 7855 6 GARAGE FF 58 DECIDUOUS 12 24 7854 9 I 1 111% PROPFRTY 1% /f)- D R-I, AND Bl,11.[)ING .. .. .. 3,HOWN AR~ ACCORDI'l l' 1/1 16.002 %1Â· ~ 1.Oy 32 T[) AN'I CONSTRLJCT1O/ 60 1,/CIDL/' S !R'' 36 78566 / 1 17\11 LOT 33 , 1-'41 21' ~ ~29 Crl-Y ()F ASPEN ZONED DITRICÂ·TS 26-7 ,Â®50 BULDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED MUIR 59 DECIDUOUS !0 20 7901.2 IÂ·wo S rolÂ¥ 4 .1 'I HOPKINS CONDO ASS{le 61 Cr>NIFFR 78576 r , / ' l FRAME It[)LISE 6,2 DECR OH 4 24 7856,4 BRICÂ·K & WOOD 146~ SIERRA VISTA I. // // 1\ 1 .NT 2 # 1 ..SP['I.C..1611 6) DECID'elS 14 24 78â€¢t N / / 1475 / 11.RRA V: IS 1 A 1)RI V E 64 DECIDI OUS 6 13 78.2 / / IMPROVEMENT Sl,RVE.Y STATEMENT, i K 0 DECIDUOUS*2 !0 20 7%510 Â· 1 1-..44 1. 26 FOR ALLEN L HODGES. 11! AND JAMI S HODGES 67 DECIDVOL S 12 24 7837 2 66 DICIDUILS.2 12 7*57 2 FLANGE 1 HERER' .TATE THIT /111. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY ./S PREPARFD BY PEAK SPRV+YING, INC . ColiFER 12 24 7.7 1 / / 1 FIRTHER STATE THAT THi IMPROVI MnTS ON THF ABOVI DFSCRIBED PARCI [ ON THIS DATE 64 DECIDL OUS/ 6 . "47 1 24 78.7 1 JANUARY 29,2014 AND JUM 2 2015.1 'CI PT CTILI'lilli.(TIONS. IR' ENTIRI I V WITHIN Il ...... 5 1 .a .11 1,0[J\[,ARIFS OF TIll F 'IÂ« 111.1 FT AS SHOW' nIAT 1111 RF AR[ NO I NCROACHMENTS WINDOW CPON THE DISCRI!*[i PRI Ilâ€¢,L> 1,~ 1MPROVEME~ 1â€¢,, i~ A>.Â¥ tDJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT Al 7, DE....'5 12 24 7/57 1 WELl ". l 1 E INDICATE D. AN.D I ll,I, I TIll Rl: IS NO APPARLN'! IA 11,1 M I I I .ION OF ANY .ASEMENT 72 DECIDEILS 14 04 78'61 6 CROSSING OR BUR [)1 Vâ€¢.u ANY PART 01Â· SAID PARC 11 1 44 1/ AS NOTI D 1 FURTHFR STATE . DE....S . 24 7.64 1 . / \ \C\ THAT 1 HAW EXAM- [> THE TIT[ [ COMMITMENT PRI !'.l D in "TKIN COUNTY TITLE, INCÂ· .' 74 COMPER . 24 7856/ I .0, 24 7.r Pc-'2184:W3.DATEDII,FCTTWOCTORFR 3.2013. Awl,NDAH F>aÂ·EPTN-STOTmFT,!AT i L.$'2 14 24 78563 â€¢4 RE.BAR & ALUM ~ ' " LJ - - 7 2, AFFECT THE SraJHT PROPERTY ARr SHOWN H[ HI ON T(~ THIÂ· 81-ST 01 MY KNOWI EDOF AND * n I ..F[iICI BEL[EF THE ERR'}R {* CLOSURE IS LESS [HAN 1 :,0/ 76 DECIDU. 24 7856) CAPL Soll.t.t-GIll i .. fml. . / ..r /2)5.* -<A 9 K m,., 77 DECID//IS . It 78'6 3 / 78 ..... . 78. ' I .-'13 Hol TUR // // 79 DE./COUS 1(). 20 7.16 ' / /4 0 /~524' 80 DEC./.S ,(r . 7816.3 / // // // // 1 0 I bl Â¥Â·Â»t Â·4Â·JA M) 78â€¢i6 4 NI DFCID' (3 S . . DECIDILS 8 16 7.64 82 DE'll'OUS 10 2(1 ... mUN U *. I DICIDIOLS 1.1 " ... Vn, 4/ 1 ;: < 3793~ g 2.. :4 ./ s. 15 DECIDWUS r 16 7% 04Â£ 21.4 , 34 78.' \ 9 .- 86 DECIMOCS 8 16 78'69 87 01Â·ClDl t~ S 12' 24 7~70 I .ty r 5, b RK DECIDI{)LIS 2 1 .4 78599 -C_/ '- '2 *,/Z*~/, ~%-Iti-IN DI+CID' Ol'S I_ 90 CONIFER 28 78~6 9 41 "I'....R 14 78570 ~\ -- 92 (Â·('NIFER 14 . 7.17 0 91 DECIDUOUS 4Â· 0 71Â¢17 2 3:5*4394 14 1 94 DICIDUOUS 24' 24 78583 15 3 CURVE TAH[LE 4,8.,132 -- 1, Cl RVE RADKIS LENGI H 1 ANGENT CHORD BEAR]NG DELTA 42- .9' 154.33 S 7:<48'59 E 43'07'01 C 1 41,1*J 46 . 23{*} 44 1 % 81 44'20 E W.'09 i P i C Â» NO. Date Revi,ion B, 11:1 -1 i 1)raul By 1JK ALLEN L. HODGES, 111 & JANET S. HODGES TIE RFANW 1 02/06/14 ADD FF El.EVA noNS JRN (.Oil 14005 WAL[ (TYP 1 I Cheeke,1 B> crrY OF ASPEN, COLORADO Projeci NO. ASPLI ./ 1Â· COURSE *.4 .r I 130 S GALINA ST â„¢:- 9 JRN 17 PEAK r 2 02/19/14 UPDATE SURVEY JRN W#*11 4 . Daw 3 ()6/13/15 l PDATE SURVIA JRN IMPROVEMENT & TOPO SURVEY ~ Surveying, lne. LOT 33, WEST ASPEN SUB., FLG NO. 1 JANUARY 31, 2014 W A< (l,RDING TO COI ORADD 1 *% Â¥01 , ~ liT COMM,ht , AN, I H.Al AC-r,Oh . D P.O Box l 746- Ritle, CO 81650 BASEL,CMâ„¢..bFE{'1 iNTH]551rR.Â¥W,1,11hll{RM Y,AR.U,i.Â¥C!~ FLRST 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE IOF! L.15,3. St i( HDIÂ·,~CT i. NO'VI,1 'AV A~Â¥ A.r]Oâ€¢4 EMS,Dbpoâ€¢4 AIC, D*,+' 1 I. Phone (9701 625.1954 - Fax (970) 579-7150 ,-p//11. 4 .lilli & ALUM TH]S W.. 1*FrnMMENCPD,OR, â„¢Ah.-'..FROM 1111Â·DA.. â„¢P C FRTIFT' ATID' /1./. NERPON CAP L S 0 ILLEGIBLE wi' peaksuneyingin'.com 005.DWG ::~~AMGWR 8.NÂ¥ld V 4 - 1 '21 S_E VISTA DRIVE ~4 ASPHALT IT./ 1 L \ , 40 1 ,. 7855 . 4 76: 'A 1.11, Li /064,ijrb 5.1 . 3 1 4; 4Â·Â«e .< 1 9 1 . ' EXISTING MAILBOX - -A -2 --42 - 0- ANT -3 1ij V \AN k. .1 Aff 22 / EXISTINGTELEPHONEPEDESTAL-----1~ i . ~-- U - i%\-4 , f EXISTING ELECTRONIC TRANSFORMER . C. r>r, i t. I .\7/ i tV - 1. 4/ $ *% 1 U. A V , i ><1-7 / \A - 4 A 7 1Â·| ~.f ' Â«4 ~ 11 1 2 24Â»1 1 -1, OUTLINE OF EXISTiNG -3 - ~ 7>q x th N -- - ASPHALTORIVE,VAY Â» 7* /14 7 9 / 4. - 0 474 /1/~ I \ 4 9 ,' Calb ' r f-VU - - -SA 9 , N. -4=-A-. % 4 1 , t' 1 LOT 32 -. i )-I % .' h ./ iMf \ -===z 1 .4 572 ..101 04 / ---- - .'. / . 1% 2.-27 b 'j 'r li . / F ~ ; _ .,41 , L EXIST,=4:2:AC:!:~: C h >f--4- , fa ~.1,/ ..- Â·I - 1.-V \ F F b --A U .Â·7 r ; I J--10 9 \:4Â· 1 - 3<6 4 , . . EXISTING ROOF OVERIAANG ADOV[ 11*14,2 2/ 1- 74 1 -4.0 ENTRY ~ PLANTER (COVERED ENTRY PORCH) 1 - i ir p PORCH ~ r.'Il , TOBE DEMOLISHED '277 AL *f , \ / 5 I" 111 0 1 â‚¬ 6 1- 3 L : /1. ~% 42 //,1/ #Ti i 5 h ....2 \ I LQI-2 * 1-3~ Trk<~I 'r - ~'~~ ~ ' ~ 1 " .. \ All Â«e ' \\ A /1 Who / 1 . 1 / 1% , ' b 41- .Â«7161 61 1 -4 \ 1 / '4 j c W re \ 1 f \41Â«2 I . ----9 / .' ..bE> . Â·' d ./.6611-- 4/1 2 - ~ / E XISTiNG ROOF OVERHAN G A.OVE : 0 1 TO BE DEMOUSHED .-- t - U-- 1 f 3.1-4 , 1 1 , a \ 1- 47 11; L / 1/ / EXISTINGUPPERLEVELDECKABOVE #4 4 . 't,&444 .61 3 - 16~~ ~ TO BE DEMOLISHED Aly 25 ~/&.1 * /- EXISTING TWOj&*5Â¥Y./ 1 L., ~ - ' ll < ' 7 BRICK & WOOP 4 - 1 2 & L ,a 11;2-5-tUL G----=- 1_-*0- 1 FRAMED HOU | WITH BASEME~ - V . a D -6 1 3,138*0*_ _. ~3 ' 0 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE _ f (I, iff- 1 1 0 / //7 / 9 44-It>k~ ' lY ' W EXISI INC WOOD DECK U7) ~ rl I [h 1/ :/ 442 TOBE DEMOLISHED + 4., t.Â¢2244i~4 7 '1 -.\ 11 . 1 04 L /L i Â«043\-.ak.,5~,4 -1. i Â» 9.-,r- 1- 6.-+ 4 6, IM-k -4 4<2Â»' l. 0Â«-- '4 .b tÂ« W ,\ , , ,.#f 4- 1 .'.AWs/-~954' 0 .- -* '9~7.1 / 'I TO BE DEMOUSHED q.,-,~C:Ji~ . p-- - - ,- , - 1-3 ' / 9- tx-----.Â« ,Â«--- -; . V v.5,251 Q . /1. l /0. '.ad 7,/ 2// ..441.1 1 ./ . i t, Â«60/1 6 2 ./ EXISTING HOT TUB TO BE DEMOUSI ICD -25.L,Â·Â·-re<lnÂ¥*,2,0-1~Well ln/bA;$1#~2*0;- . Â·i-- PLANTER 9 ExisTINGFENCE - - ~-)69=%!19~49K- -.---- N ... 9 SHEDTOBEDEMOLISHIED--- -- X.'.guin,3,0223~~16& / 6 , 4 <)3413% , \ 13 ~1\1 LOT BOUNDARY 2 f F .'*j:~>*Itubt ..fcf-- Ii. 1- , ./. 10 UTILITY EASEMENT je'lf, A NELMÂ» 4743 *-.Il - ---BOPE LOI 1 ASPEN GOLF COURSE - -7--2--0-- ,_ r . 0 44 le ./ /3 - 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST .0 A-01 1 EXISTING SITE PLAN I 1/8" = 1'-0" 06.15 2015 Clri ARCHITECTS WEi ' VISTA DRIVE ~ ASPHALT 'TY' i SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: 0 /14 1 1 ARCHITECTURAL T OFF 100Â·-0" EQUALS SURVEY ELEVATION 7858 44' 2 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN USED TO LOCATE RESIDENCE / ADDITION ONLY {SURVEYOR TO ' ~ CONFIRM EXACT LOCATION IN FIELD) ALL OTHER INFORMATION SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY , . ~ 4 REFER TO SURVEY FOR ACCURATE EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING TOPOGRAPHY AND LOCATION \ 3 EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY OF EXISTING UTILITIES 0-j-4/4 --7 Â« / ~~~~~ INFORMATION 5 REFER TO LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR PROPOSED GRADING AND DETAILED LANDSCAPE - 443 /60 \-2/. xi *&*3 4/ 4 1 ,/4,1 --1 / 44â‚¬ 4-4-1. 4 / 9 44 014// EXISTING MAILBOX -- -- Â·Â·â‚¬f<t~,p : - 2#:rm #f , \ EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL - ~ \ \rÂ» 1341-41'&0~ 'v ~. , \431<rtff 1 9 1 AL./ . /,' 1 , EXISTING ELECTRONIC TRANSFORMER ~ ~- ~ \ il + 1 , Â·' f.1.4 / f -%+ 1 . 33* d - 1 , 6 1 -3 r . 1 / 2.0. 6 , 4 . 22. ,x x , - OUTLINE OF EXISIING: <~ -~4-A,<~ ~ ~ ASPHALT DRIVEWAY / LOCAT ION TO REMAIN 2-- %.b # & 1 /1 1 ./ /1 4- . :.. 1 I Iii \ 1 2 - /1 .447 , , _ Un..2 C~470 86/ , . /9 4 P , I ; 1,1 <J:IJO-ffitb-W \>$ h \ 11% , /- kry)., -A,K#.... /i \ Lrk..1/2111~.-239Â£44110?* - 21 l' A- , - 01, 7 9% OIL- 1 42/ , A \17 -/ 4 -- 1 3.*. : ,/.4 2/14 -LYN -7857. 1 -3 L, ' OUTLIN E OF SOLAR PANELS -1 6: 2 'w> 4 . 1- 6-4 > f ~E . .4 129 1, 1 -67857.7 . 1/k >CRS~6 ' ' ,-1 /A . . _ 1 FGARAGE-ENTRANCE 0 --UL - ~27.:TCY'AFFFIA: j M"ti - 99/ 21*1 f -11-, -1 l- L r ,--Â«1- ...5*0muff t./g i .1 4 \ 1 '7 - ~INX\\\ .ru ZÂ»// ,\ , --3 I. - - /858 42 - - Sh 1 %Â«--1 9.--_12" 7420 642% I -11 ENTRY PORCH 1 \ 5 ..1 ....../ \~ 2 ~>1-Â·th -I ill 1 ----------4-----4-------------------- ------ ----------Â·------i-----------------T------ --------- GASMETER . ~ \9<-F--1,- , '0Â·k I LOT 34 , / IN- 1 k 476514Â£ 1 4 [ FLECTRICAL SUB PAÂ·.5, . Â¥~>/ / /1 1'4 #ik lb, M 4 V i A~C UNIT .-' 100'-Â·0" T ARCHITECTURAL , >i</ / / 47t>jimwk.W.F. ' _1 ' 1 W /' / 1 ( ~41 9:_ 4 ~ F' '\ PER/l 6.3 1 11 ' 1<iiN \ ~ ~ ff 1- 1 % 0 I '>i''IL,tok\ OUTLINE OF ROOF & b--a.. - - YJ T / BUILDING ABOVE CM 4%1' 01/, / A-,c UN~T# -. th . Â»h .9<11 1/ / |NEW ADDITION [DARK POCHE] '' , 1 1 1 7-- 2- 1 7 41.4 4 h\96 ill // INTAKEIS 80'LaxENTS 4-A IBOILER AiR --- R 0 ;1 1 1 . .Ure.. -%- 7/1 rax> -- Â· : ' 20,9' __ , -% I -4/7 0 3 1 F IREPLACE 1 14.- 1 /*f-K /.ellMeW'FAkiknit _ , ~.yp 1 ~ FLUES PROPOSED TWO STORY REMODEL C 10. , -(-yinÂ» tfÂ» ' '9 * f 49--19->- >Â»Â»4% / -'1-,2~/ ' I Â·. 35.EL _ I WITH BASEMENT lIE. 41 1--,2- [AREA DEPICTED WITH POCHE'] f123135<~M---4 f .64,4 / - - 1 1 1 d '7-4441 ~ 97/ 0 ;94,14?' 4~95)~WiSE 1,~1 - - 0 -.Â£ IM 19 1/12 4 ;Le /66 2 4% 2%*024Â£' R:C./.14. 3.1351/< 2 - -'7 1 C Â«r-1 r Â·*/.' <prÂ«-1.11 ~*33301'~ 1 ~ 4 TH ' ,,7858.42 - 1 Â» <*r LIVING#KITCHEN , -Â·-4/9- 1-zÂ·70 ' 4 PATIO - OUTUNE OF DECK ABOVE - ' PERIMETER OF /, - , 4 : EXCAVATION LAYBACK + -1-+1 0 Al I I 4.-t 1 , 1. m RE SECTIONSol,AD,01 +/1 4-1. 2 r.1 - INGRAITERIe~~~ + '143.9. .1,--, L 01'.505 -' ~ PER 26 575 020 EÂ» \\ \ ~ - - - , I \Â«46 r \' 4' L> I \ <31 f/tra / 20 -A ' --2 Â«t-91-3 22 60 L)Uy~NGÂ¥ENCE - - -1 252'LE{!53!HEM+L -i~ - - - - -- - TO REMAIN * 55 .9 -: 3 -1- N 11 I . / 71 -t.- - LOTBOUNDARY , ~' +4' 3~* 67- 1, 10' UTILITY EASEMENT - *gy L\?Â©// /// If .-7 \ Pr, :7 5 , 4/ ,< Â·1492>14 / I ..,1 , ,\1. \ 1QI-1 : 0 1 ASPEN GOLF COURSE -- 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST .a A-02 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1 SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 06.15 2015 Clri ARCHITECTS 6\ 94, i ff 7856 1 . Â·t A ' .' . - 1, . 4 . A< I. Â· 4.Â· f *r fritÂ·* < :1*twt. B Ad,6-4 . I I '4, 1- b - ' 'Â¢11:- ': a.*:.1-.0 . . . bit"27 _4* %114..y - 2-U * . 4-~.441.2 4,52*44** t#M-: ~ .- 1.t 4#% t % -,1.:,24'.'.1.2,~~.Â»00*47*#r .- **4.. 1 *,U-lu. I '* .... ..i ~ u Â·,4 0/<4-4,-- 4 91-- 8.. Â· . 'Â·Â·/1~&~1,~~ .., 1g r~~~3' 'ZI. .Â·--12-*,IÂ· c.*Â·r'â€¢tt' ~7~,s - ..0,4:r 442 3:'.2~*53*.i./ Â·41~~Â·o.-0,6.* . .. .,14>fi-:17 1.- .i, .t..Â· . 2.2 h . f wi . $442 ts ' 6Â·.g~jÂ·i~+ ~' Â·.Â·'te Â«4 9â€¢- f .ms 0f>fj~.~ .'4Â·Â· .2144. '4 *'"'*""30*#v*.23 .Â»,41.., 9 Â·~~.- - 4//Aliti~..*t.:-t}L~1*Ri % ..Â·-*XM+ :1Â·'4 Â·*74 79*dilate 2,Â·1&:-LJA *Aw -2- -"~1~*~ 13'I %#B== .*~~,:,4.4 .ruit .- 1 6 7/~n# 4:2/*.2-%Uk-i,,AÂ·f Â·Â·,4~41~ 414 -l~I - 1*.4.#9:9,6.#L- 4 33*#w: - :,: re i,,c: . . 4 - lijid'.+~80. a -* f'led/%9<M. iâ‚¬E ~7 1-.9-2 ;4/ '. % *Di:r~FS *: 1 ..1 . TAiri:Â°~*4 - .Ir Â«2- .. , .,..*0;~1 k;rl'. 49 -~.Br 776<.Fe,4: -7.,,11 i ..1 , .f ./ 'i .7 , - D ~Â»11. . .*0 -.1 ' 6.; .i Z:_ 1/64,- 4 1 1 * . , .. --u-LAT.Â·4-/â‚¬ i-. - .. 7 -427 *râ€ž11,3.2 ...32 ". 1 9 ,-lk ~ 34*2 4-30'64 17- 9. . - .7.*, . 9 M/~Â·â‚¬a -5 -_i*.1 3 *. 4 V- e Â»-442_ -' . ... . ,-2â€ž t - - Â· -,t:=39/1/:.I-'- I - 4 .... .9Â» 44-- - -- ..44 ./ . â€¢/ .... -4 :, . Li. ~ Z. .... .8 . 0. .. ,- 0 0. a*r -Â· Â·Â·~ 9.-/-.k. .a ~;91* 0 P, all. Â» 1,E.al-:$*. -4 - .:>qi) + 45 Ek ;:t? 4,/~7 1 : 1 0 . . - 4 ....4Â¥4,4/ 90915 ' 4 19.: '. 4/ff; . 0 I j.-di , 1 * Th 19*'> I p : 147--Â« Â·,A,-t:q.t~' I - .A D + , ... .. -1 .. . ......- . . ... . . . 1. 0 ' 11 ' ..32 * t---Â· % 1310. \ \ 36~ 3 1220 1 \ 1 %%/// < A 161 . 5 , . Snoweunny V 77 0 3979 1 \\ \ 1354 49 \ 16 / //*//l // i V 1 \ 4 e \ .PA 71' 61' \ \ \ R-15 \ 0 \ 56' I / 44 2 \ \ \ 1412. .,2 1 \-4 1 . 4 \\ ..1 1. -- 2 42 - â‚¬ F t t 60' ' 5 'L 0 - 7 1 1\ / ~ 60' 1%, \' .//. v Â¥ IL---a 52' 1 6 \1 \ ..\ A 99 1 1': l \. Â· 76 1 j .\ , ./ / 0 1. --,Â·/ 173 ft 6'92 1 A.62*1 SIERRA VISTA DR R-15% 'm / \NON< I 78' 1 ,#1 NOTE. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ESTIMATED AND ROUNDED OFF TO THE < 876 ~ NEAREST DIMENSIONAL FOOT THESE ESTIMATED I DISTANCES WERE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF ASPEN GIS *-- INTERACTIVE WEBSITE ~87- 1 ~,t- L-Lf Z LEGEND j ~ 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE .j rf 90. ~ 3 -- 1 ,. '' 1435, 5/ 30 RESIDENCES NOT CONFORMING TO "BUILDING ORIENTATION" [THESE RESIDENCES MAY ALSO HAVE STREET FACING GARAGES] - RESIDENCES WITH STREET FACING GARAGES 1475 Lr--0 , IT~Izinlin I 11/ 1 1,-rrm-rrTi.71Â«7717 i 825. DISTANCE OF STREET FACING GARAGE TO CURB fijiNT#NT/ifff##ff/*gn ~u.i- 9 855. 1 48 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST BILe A-04 1 BLOCK PLAN 1 SCALE : AS NOTED 06.15.2015 Clri ARCHITECTS % I e 81EBEAQRIME LQI-32 NQIE [Cul-De-Sac] \ THIS DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATES DRIVEWAYAND VEHICULAR , REQUIREMENTS [PROVIDED BY ROARING FORK ENGINEERIN(A FOR A , ~ SIDE LOADED GARAGE BASED ON THE EXISTING LOCATION OF THE GARAGE TO REMAIN PER THIS APPLICATION. \ ~ 73?ftf?39- \ I / >f \ LQI.Il 1 1 i 1 - \./ 11 1 1 , 7 1 OUTLINE OF EXISITNG DRIVEWAYANDAUTO COURT 1 'TO REMAIN UNDER CURRENT PROPOSAL] ' LQI.li . C* , - -1 / LDING SE / APPROXIMATELY 14 EXISTING TREES WOULD HAVE 1 1 TO BE REMOVED FOR DRIVEWAYASSOCIATED WITH SIDE 1 11 F LOADED GARAGE h- i | Â· DRIVEWAY NECESSARY FOR SIDE LOADED GARAGE ISHADED] ENCROACHING 9.7' ON LOT 32 ~\ VEHICULAR SIMULATION i I [USING TOYOTA COROLLA (5Â·xE) / ~ | MAXIMUM TURNING ANGLE OF 40 DEGREES] EMIRY Â¥ 2 U [LOCATION OF EXISTING M i E~ I- :lizillillillil~~~~~ , Pi*zieiTvii 6li& / lijli Mi m El 51 O 91 3 1 A 4 ---- A 0 91 [LOCATION OF . 1 152 \ EXISTING AND 1 1 PROPOSED 1 \ i 1 1 1 1 I iIi, \\ \ < 43 , HA\ x 1 1 : / // 0 1 \ 4 1 \Ok \54 4 .gO i I ! 1 w i mulltis 3* 94. i.4 1 / / | | --------- ~~ - OUTLINE OF PROPOSED - / HOUSE REMODEL / 1 ~ ~~X <, ADDITION i i r. ~ \ 1 1 1 1 t. / 1 I bl \I // 1 1 / 1 1 / , M / ./0 1.j / A- ' , ill '1-' I / 11 // / 1 / / 11 - . It -~Kk , 11 / I. / ROARING FORK i 1 0 - / 1 1 / i 1 / / - - - - . - BUILDING SETBACK _ -- ----- / ~ENGINEERING / UTILITY EASEMENT 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIA NCE REQUEST MILJ A-06 1 SIDE LOADED GARAGE DIAGRAM I SCALE : 1/8" = 1'-0" 06.15.201 5 CIL ARCHITECTS ETBACK 9 REFER TO PLAN DIAGRAM A-13/ 01-A MQIEL 1 ARCHITECTURAL TO FF 100Â·-0 EQUALS SURVEY ELEVATION 7858.44'. ENTRY STOOp SiARAGE 11 ' 4-LLi*LJL__UL- 'I~1 IL.... \JI] / Â° TryÂ»' #-*' L=. 11 ngtill i /' w,-. n wh 191 010 j EL 100'.0- / -*TO-PrBARAGE LEVEL |~ 7 TO F.F MAIN LEVEL 0 11 14/li -7-1 1 1 1 - -*-~i STORAGE ==7 - v ] V i MABIEK 1 "&8111 1 11 N '9&MI 11 - 1 11 1 ]C-- _____ Ual ____$ 1/47 L 1 ' 111 iI&12./2 glwiNG.figgi 1 -------- , 1 1 1 1 1 4 , 111 LLI 1 I mi t /62\ 1 1 1.'' MSTR. 7 1 Â·4 CLST #2 Mil IT 1 1- - - - - ------- -- 1 CLST.#1 n==,1.22 61 1 1 - 1 .1 - CID 0 1 1 2.2.-1 1 1 1 - I.-A- e - TOFFMSTR LEVEL -- ' | |1- ~ 1 7 -2 rl -r-T- - 1 , 1, 1 L----- ------- -1- 11 1@ &%1 ,-1 21 m= 1 1.DUbla.BQQM i El/21&hi ~ 92Â» 10 1 1 BDRM #2 PATIO ' 1 A - 1 a 1 1/-1 0 L.-~ JJ - 1 1 1 1 AilÂ©. E- - P -- 1 -- 1 LIVING / KITCHEN MASTER PATIO 28DQ =1: N 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST MILe A-07 1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN I SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 06.15.2015 Clu ARCHITECTS IZG Lo21 OUTLINE OF MAIN LEVEL STRUCTUIC OCLOW SOLID ENTRY PORCH ROOF BELOW ouTIN[ or noor.Â·.00:[ CUW.GE FAC:DI DELOW ---------------------1 1 1 I --11 , 1 1--1 -)2"0 -/ & UTLINE OF ROOF BELOW I-1 1 - n~RQQM #3 . 1 1 1 11 .=7 1 th-_-_41 - Ld / 1 1 1 1 rx-- Â« __ 7 Lar - .ALL 3 W.I.C. 45 ORD -1 -ililI ~ in f= F T OFF UPPER LEVEL T O PLY UPPER LEVEL 1,-*11 111 11- -- 1 1 /33\ 1 LA R - mi â€¢ I I A-12 1 1 T 1 KORQQUE M )Cd-W 4 EL, 111'-43/4 7 T.O. F F LANDING .AEL.11Â£2_11Â£ 1' T.o. p.F DECK (ATGUARDRAIL) ~ (STONE TILE) A EL 113-75/8" E-------14 T TO F.F LANDING J .j........L 4 Eli 113-55/8 7 TO F F LANDING L TT OFF DECK (AT EDGE) ~ (STONE TILE) N 6 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST MIL, A-08 1 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1 SCALE 1/4" = 1 '-0 " 06.15.2015 Ci ARCHITECTS I.I.U............. ' PHOTO VOLTAIC PANI S 111 T OTAL1 FASTENED FLAT TO ROOF REFER TO ADDITIONAL SOLAR PANE L DOCUMENTATION FOR DESIGN, INSTALLATION INFORMATION (sE....Row'/se [10<-~ENTSI 01 U TINE OF SOL D ENTRV ROOF BELOR OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE BELOV. GUTTER GAINGE WALL BELOW DS , Â¥ I 4 .IDS . ly ./5 /4 SLOPE - -ti ; t-P,/-6,- ..INHIP']111 1111 ;lilli. r Llz'. j ~I:Â· 33~1274~'35),~ ; 9/ .~TRi.'11*13. .~/ft/4~90Â«f/.. .''I ~1 '7.-, - 9.7 i ,/AP li/h. 11 . . , /Â»v /9,/ F /3925~.,r. -.IX,/%11#JL =11</fal' '- 22@f ilill 1 1 ~0: 44 Â· . 9,9Â«2*Â«X'/ 2/33' Â·- . . 29,4/04:1454% lit;Â· Â· - MEMBRANE ROOF OVER . ~~~ f Â·'&.' ~ mAE Â» Â·Â· ' '4/9-9,4 Â· '. *81<::~*5'T~'I'PE . ~.=/I~1,242 SLOPED RIGi D INSULATION iRE DETAI TYPICAI . i <9> ~ gÂ«39/ ~IDS Eff i 4/6 9/ 30// DOWN SPOI BE LOW - GUI n R 2 I. I ROUTEDTOGUTTER , -DE ..LINE Of ROOF BELOW GUT,ER 1 48 1 48 4 St OPE SLOPE . GUTTER ROU TE D TO CATCH -- 8AS1N BELOW & ROUTED TO DRYWELL PER CIVIL 4 - - GUTERS 1 48 2196 - zek SlopE - r. @ --- - ..DS -- ~A BOILERVENTS ' G C TO VER. - ME MBRANE R.01 OVER MFG CLEARANCES SLOPED RIGID INSULATION IRE DETAIL ....Al & 02 1 A-'2 1 48 A ROOF STEP goff - 77 OUTLiNF OF STRUCTURE BELOW KITCHEN HOOD EXHAUST Â¥g FIREPLACE CHIMNEÂ¥ 1 FLUE Â¥ & OUTLINE OF ROOf - -ALIa M DN 1 IS 7 DECK BELOI ' CHIMNE I EXTER,OR STAIR BE L OW GUTTERS OUTLINE O, DECK GUARDRAI BELOW iDS 4 DOWNSPOUT IN WALL N ROUTE PERM, 4 ~ GUIER 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST . Li A-09 1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN I SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 0 6 15 2015 Cli ARCHITECTS CHIMNEY BEYOND 25' HEIGHT LIMIT GUTTER BEYOND TT O WINDOW HEAD \ /\/ I 05% \ / 4 ROOF BEYOND RE SOUTH ELEVATION C I = 4 20 0 4 +955 --n :#E X4 k L- ------------------------ :4 1 FIll 1'Â·fl I TIFF UPPER LEVEL (PROPOSED) 4 JI_12Â£_ T TO WIDOW HEAD -11 2 - - -+T'824,(EAD - LELLI LILLI Z ~ 9 2 I I *M Â£ 3 5 9. CHAIN DOKNISPOUT '0 0000 8 -0 T m ~ EXISTING, FINISH GRADE r @T 4 \\ - i-- 111JELLJ Efll--- \ 1 - - -+fyÂ·AiNTRY LEVEL 1 1 1 T TO FF GARAGE LEVEL- L__ 1 1 - - - NEW METAL & GLASS GARAGE 20_-_-33---------------------7--3--_-_-_-_-_3-1--0----0----7333-----------313 DOOR ALL GLASS INDOOR TO BE SAFETY GLAZ/G on'_AÂ· ..../LOWER LEVEL 62 PROPOSED I NORTH ELEVATION 1 SCALE 1/4- 1 '-0 lj 'z TO FF ENTRY LEVEL - -/ -- Pil---L] DELLE / -1- M - / K - EXISTING GRADE - - - - - - - - - - - - - W~~-~ill---I--Ill - - 1- - -6 - - ---- - - - ~- -- T TOFFENTRY LEVEL -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - ---- -7 \L.Â»11= TO FF DEN LEVEL \ i A QR'Â·10 1/ Â¥ETFURAGE LEVEL ENTRY AND GARAGE FACAH S TOREMAIN .TOFF LOWER LEVEL ci EXISTING I NORTH ELEVATION <01>CALEW-r==--~~~ 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST A-10 1 EXISTING +PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATIONS I SCALE Â· 1/4" = 1 '-0 " 06.15.2015 C~Ilid ARCHITECTS CHIMNEY _12..1 -- 25' HEIGHT L/MtT 2 2 - - - - - - - - - I _ i _ i _ 6 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ -*EL.1 TO WINDOW HEAD EL-1-15Â£*______ i. / 4 T O WINDOW HEAD T 4 36 HIGH STEEL CABLE GUARDRAIL CHIMNEY BEYOND I T TO WALL !2 \ / TTo FF DECK {AT STAIR) _ _ _ _ _ _ - /~-T-/77-5Â¥/R INDING T O PLY DECK 4 _1EL 111Â·-5 T TIFF UPPER LEVEL (PROPOSEDI 5 S 4 MI- L_ Â· NEW EXTER,OR STAIR b :b I T O WINDOW~HEM 1 EXTERIOR STEP LIGHT FIXTURES (TYP ) 3 0 RE LIGHTING PLANS C FINISH GRADE EXISTING GRADE NEW CONC RETE LANDING ..11:L 100.-0. TTO FF ENTRY LEVEL 1 1 | - -+MLI HEAD ' I i: 11 1 1:; :~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 F.---------------- :t 1 1 1. +TOCOIC SLAB d 170 1 33.0 3- r --F-TO FF LOWER LEVEL /2--_5 /64--PROPOSED1WEST-ELEVATION *U.~ SCALE 1/4' = 1Â·-0 I I ing.lin- - 1 ----------- TO/FENT-RY LEVEL EXISTING GRADE -- - - TOJFF(ENTRYLEVEL n ' A EL 99Â·+1 3/4 -'FE-FFEEN LEVEL T TOFF LOWER LEVEL 41-@i~~T=INflWESTELEMATION ZONE 1-13_3__El_LIULA__KLE_TA__ElLLYE_JLLEJ_FULM_ElL_______~5hfl A-11 1 EXISTING+PROPOSED WEST ELEVATIONS I SCALE : 1/4" = 1'-0" 06 15.2015 Crid ARCHITECTS CHIMNEY -------------- GUTTER RE ROOF PLAN _12- 1 1 /L 25Â· HEIGHT LIMIT 4 IT O WINDOW HEAD DOWNSPOUT B CHÂ¢MNEY ~ ~ WINDOW BEYOND 4 DECK / GUARDRAIL BEYOND --21 2 9 IEL 111-5 Â¥TO FF UPPER LEVEL (PROPOSED) ~7 0 WINDOW HEAD 3 GUTTERS RE ROOF PLAN 2 03 3 ' 3% 11 1 DOWNSPOUTS EXISTING / FINISH GRADEE 111 --9-TOFF ENTRY LEVEL \ lei -10.4. BOUR AIR INTAKES | 1 T TOFF GARAGE LEVEL RE FLOOR PLAN GAS METER I 22222222222222222222222222222%2222- -- ELECTRIC METER ----------------------------------------______-__--______--___--______ _=L.EL-ELIL VT O FF LOWER LEVEL (~21 PROPOSED I EAST ELEVATION r-SWErlÂ¥-i--74' T TOFF UPPER LEVEL - EXISTING GRADE ./TIFF ENTRY LEVEL ~ -1-T OFF DEN LEVEL -TOFF GARAGE LEVEL -MI OFF LOWER LEVEL til-293IJ91@ASTELEVATION 1131___El_LIL8__8__Kl_LT_3____91LLY_E__lifll_FULM_Rf___~ ~ A-12 1 EXISTING + PROPOSED EAST ELEVATIONS I SCALE Â· 1/4" = 1'-0" 06.15.2015 CL ARCHITECTS . i~.4% 7 14 /t . : . f NG'. k - â‚¬4% (4,4- ' . .'LI : " 1 1. I f. ./ I. ,& 1 ==Cr - h. 1 2. a F ... 1 \44 . 1 - .W.~atid.,i: ./4 V I , N. li - i I -\.4 li : .*1 1---71. ..6. 14 1- , 1.. - .42 r J Nati 4 01 ENTRY PORCH PERSPECTIVE 11QIL THIS ILLUSTRATION DEPICTS THE ENTRY PORCH DESIGN AS CURRENTLY PROPOSED IN THIS APPLICATION. 1475 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE REQUEST BiL, V A-14 1 PROPOSED PERSPECTIVES 1 SCALE Â·N.T.S. 06.15.2015 elri ARCHITECTS