Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.69 Shady Ln.0013.2015.ASLUfm VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 1000' WEST 1/4 CORNER - — SECTION 7 3" BLM BRASS CAP (FND) ' # �► �.,�' ; +� ,mss � . SIZE DRIP POWER POLE CONIFEROUS ® WELL 2 4& WATER SHUT OFF 15' In WATER PUMP (3)4- O TELEPHONE PEDESTAL s`• , • UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE .T—T } AS MARKED BY OTHERS oe oe OVERHEAD ELECTRIC CONIFEROUS 4" WOOD FENCE * ,� �``�^ '� ;�� mom. � . • fm VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 1000' WEST 1/4 CORNER - — SECTION 7 3" BLM BRASS CAP (FND) BOOK 568, PAGE 75 / REFERENCES CENTER OF ROARING FORK RIVER / ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES PARCEL NO. 273707300801 BOOK 568, PAGE 75 oe / �2, / \ N21 *31'49"W 35. • I / >z5j / C M / EXISTING EDGE OF WATER AUGUST 2009 . 2/ ITY OF ASPEN CONTROL MONUMENT GPS -6 FOUND 3" ALUMINUM CAP (ILLEGIBLE) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. LEGEND Q YD U� -X<w CC)-) zO SIZE DRIP POWER POLE CONIFEROUS ® WELL 2 4& WATER SHUT OFF 15' In WATER PUMP (3)4- O TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DECIDUOUS 6" UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE .T—T CONIFEROUS AS MARKED BY OTHERS oe oe OVERHEAD ELECTRIC CONIFEROUS 4" WOOD FENCE x DECIDUOUS 12" 18' DECIDUOUS TREE DECIDUOUS 10" CONIFEROUS TREE BOOK 568, PAGE 75 / REFERENCES CENTER OF ROARING FORK RIVER / ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES PARCEL NO. 273707300801 BOOK 568, PAGE 75 oe / �2, / \ N21 *31'49"W 35. • I / >z5j / C M / EXISTING EDGE OF WATER AUGUST 2009 . 2/ ITY OF ASPEN CONTROL MONUMENT GPS -6 FOUND 3" ALUMINUM CAP (ILLEGIBLE) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 31 1 AT PAGE 307) BEGINNING AT A POST STANDING ABOUT 30 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTERS CREEK AND 50 FEET WEST FROM THE CENTER OF THE DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD TRACK, SAID POST BEING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL OF GROUND DEEDED TO SAID DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY BY THE HALLAM LAND COMPANY; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD 266 FEET TO THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE FOLLOWING THE NORTH AND EAST BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER WITH COURSES WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 780 FEET TO THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTERS CREEK AT ITS JUNCTION WITH ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE N89'44'E, 220 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH ALL WATER RIGHTS PERTAINING THERETO. SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN SECTION SEVEN (7), TOWNSHIP TEN (10) SOUTH, RANGE EIGHTY-FOUR (84) WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (AS SURVEYED) A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICUALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING 30' SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTER CREEK, (WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEARS: S8829'40"W A DISTANCE OF 499.25 FEET); THENCE S08'03'41 "E ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD A DISTANCE OF 260.69 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY BANK OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER THE FOLLOWING THIRTEEN (13) COURSES: 1. S74'20'45"W A DISTANCE OF 63.86 FEET; 2. S23'49'22"W A DISTANCE OF 61.42 FEET; 3. S59.22'27"W A DISTANCE OF 61.71 FEET 4. S72'08'49"W A DISTANCE OF 43.05 FEET; 5. S78.05'13"W A DISTANCE OF 91.12 FEET; 6. N82'25'32"W A DISTANCE OF 65.31 FEET; 7. N60'40'18"W A DISTANCE OF 53.12 FEET; 8. N43'23'03"W A DISTANCE OF 79.12 FEET; 9. N21 *31'49"W A DISTANCE OF 35.19 FEET; 10. N55'43'43"E A DISTANCE OF 50.85 FEET; 11. N48'15'25"E A DISTANCE OF 62.81 FEET; 12. N17'05'12"E A DISTANCE OF 64.93 FEET; 13. N28'27'14"E A DISTANCE OF 136.43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BANK OF HUNTER CREEK; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY BANK N85'45'50"E A DISTANCE OF 238.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2.755 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. NOTES 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF TRUE NORTH DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS YIELDING A BEARING OF N89'53'49"E BETWEEN THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, A BLM BRASS CAP IN PLACE AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, A REBAR AND CAP L.S. NO. 2376 FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. 2. DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST 13, 2009, SEPTEMBER 1, 2010, ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHY AND TREE LOCATION ON FEBRUARY 2, 2011. 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS FIELD SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 311 AT PAGE 307, BOOK 512 AT PAGE 253, BOOK 348 AT PAGE 951, BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967, BOOK 292 AT PAGE 472, BOOK 568 AT PAGE 75, RECEPTION NO. 557260, RECEPTION NO. 501239, RECEPTION NO. 463751, FINAL PLAT OF TRUEMAN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PROJECT RECORDED IN BOOK 5 AT PAGE 70, DENVER RIO GRANDE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 3 AT PAGE 388 AS RECEPTION NO. 134450 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN. 5. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE GUARANTY FUND, INC., DATED AUGUST 18, 2010 (COMMITMENT NUMBER PC201008007311 FILE NO. PC10002778). 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (NAVD 29) REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION S159 HAVING A PUBLISHED ELEVATION OF 7715.64. 7. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 8. FLOOD INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097CO203 C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE WAS BASED ON DETERMINED ELEVATIONS SHOWN THEREON (NAVD 1929). 9. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS (NO8'00'00"W) ARE RECORD MEASUREMENTS. 10. ONLY THOSE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MARKED OUT AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY ARE SHOWN. 11. OVERLAPS GENERATED BY REC. NO. 204516 (HAHN, LLC TO HINES) ARE NOT SHOWN BASED ON QUIET TITLE ACTION SHOWN IN REC. NO. 123616. SURVEYOR`S CERTIFICATE TO: MUSTANG HOLDINGS, LLC, ATTORNEYS TITLE GUARANTY FUND, INC., THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS," JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS IN 2005, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, A, 3, 4, 5, 7(a), 8, 10, 11(a)(b) and 13 OF TABLE A THEREOF. PURSUANT TO THE ACCURACY STANDARDS AS ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS AND IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF THIS CERTIFICATION, UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION, AS A LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, THE RELATIVE POSITIONAL ACCURACY OF THIS SURVEY DOES NOT EXCEED THAT WHICH IS SPECIFIED THEREIN. LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LEES THAN 1 PART IN 15,000. I7_�-is FRANK W. HARRINGTON, LS NO. 19598 CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY AT O'CLOCK .M., ON THE DAY OF A.D. 2010, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK PAGE RECEPTION NO. BY: CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY w U) U LL > : mw TREE CHART Q YD U� -X<w TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP 1 CONIFEROUS 6" 13' 2 CONIFEROUS 8" 15' 3 DECIDUOUS (3)4- 18' 4 DECIDUOUS 6" 11' 5 CONIFEROUS 6" 10' 6 CONIFEROUS 4" 8' 7 DECIDUOUS 12" 18' 8 DECIDUOUS 10" 15' 9 DECIDUOUS 15" 20' 10 DECIDUOUS 15" 20' 11 DECIDUOUS 10" 15' 12 DECIDUOUS 15" 22' 13 DECIDUOUS 8" 15' 14 DECIDUOUS 8" 15' 15 CONIFEROUS 6" 12' 16 DECIDUOUS (3)4- 18' 17 DECIDUOUS (2)8" 20' 18 DECIDUOUS (3)8". 20' 19 DECIDUOUS 8" 12' 20 DECIDUOUS 10" 18' 21 DECIDUOUS 6" 12' 22 DECIDUOUS 6" 12' 23 DECIDUOUS 312" 25' 24 CONIFEROUS 8" 14' 25 DECIDUOUS 210" 18- 26 DECIDUOUS 210" 18' 27 CONIFEROUS 3" 8- 28 DECIDUOUS 6" 12' 29 DECIDUOUS 8" 15' 30 DECIDUOUS 5" 10' 31 DECIDUOUS 6" 10' 32 DECIDUOUS 6" 10' 33 DECIDUOUS (2)12" 18' 34 DECIDUOUS 6" 10' 35 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 36 DECIDUOUS 18" 25' 37 DECIDUOUS 10" 15' 38 DECIDUOUS 12" 18' 39 DECIDUOUS 15" 20' 40 DECIDUOUS 18" 25' 41 DECIDUOUS 14" 15' 42 DECIDUOUS 15" 20' 43 DECIDUOUS 12" 12' 44 DECIDUOUS 26" 30' 45 DECIDUOUS 312" 32' 46 DECIDUOUS 24" 30' 47 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 48 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 49 DECIDUOUS MY 12' 50 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 51 DECIDUOUS (2)3" 12' 52 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 53 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 54 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 55 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 56 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 57 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 58 DECIDUOUS 5" 10' 59 CONIFEROUS 28" 30' 60 CONIFEROUS 30" 26' 61 CONIFEROUS 6" 14' 62 CONIFEROUS 8" 18' 63 CONIFEROUS 8" 18' 64 CONIFEROUS 12" 20' 65 DECIDUOUS 14" 18' 66 DECIDUOUS 14" 18' 67 DECIDUOUS 14" 18' 68 DECIDUOUS 14" 18' 69 DECIDUOUS 14" 18' 70 DECIDUOUS 24" 25' 71 DECIDUOUS 24" 25' 72 CONIFEROUS 15" 2T- 73 DECIDUOUS 12" 17' 74 DECIDUOUS (2)4" 15' 75 DECIDUOUS 12" 17' 76 CONIFEROUS (2)8" 15' 77 DECIDUOUS 6" 12' 78 DECIDUOUS 24" 28' 79 DECIDUOUS 15" 18' 80 DECIDUOUS 12" 18' 81 DECIDUOUS 24" 28' 82 CONIFEROUS 8" 16' 83 CONIFEROUS 8" 16' 84 CONIFEROUS 10" 18' 85 CONIFEROUS 8" 16' 86 DECIDUOUS 10" 13' 87 DECIDUOUS 6" 10' 88 CONIFEROUS 15" 15' 89 DECIDUOUS 11" 17' 90 1 DECIDUOUS 8" 12' 91 DECIDUOUS 6" 10' 92 DECIDUOUS 11" 12' 93 DECIDUOUS 14" 18' 94 DECIDUOUS 14" 18' 95 CONIFEROUS 8" 15' 96 CONIFEROUS 4" 10' 97 CONIFEROUS 6" 12' 98 CONIFEROUS 7" 12' 99 CONIFEROUS 6" 10' 100 DECIDUOUS 8" 10' 101 DECIDUOUS 4" 10' 102 DECIDUOUS (2)4" 10' 103 CONIFEROUS 8" 14' 104 CONIFEROUS 6" 13' 105 DECIDUOUS 212" 25' 106 DECIDUOUS 4" 8' 107 DECIDUOUS 6" 10' 108 DECIDUOUS 8" 14' 109 CONIFEROUS 4" 8' 110 DECIDUOUS 15" 22' 111 CONIFEROUS 6" 15' 112 DECIDUOUS 3" 6' 113 DECIDUOUS 10" 18' 114 DECIDUOUS 10" 18' 115 DECIDUOUS 10" 18' 116 DECIDUOUS 8" 15' 117 DECIDUOUS (5)8" 18' 118 CONIFEROUS 36" 26' 119 DECIDUOUS 12" 15' 120 DECIDUOUS 8"-4" 10' 121 CONIFEROUS 23" 30' 122 CONIFEROUS 30" 33' 123 1 CONIFEROUS 30" 33' 124 1 DECIDUOUS 6" f 10' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 31 1 AT PAGE 307) BEGINNING AT A POST STANDING ABOUT 30 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTERS CREEK AND 50 FEET WEST FROM THE CENTER OF THE DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD TRACK, SAID POST BEING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL OF GROUND DEEDED TO SAID DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY BY THE HALLAM LAND COMPANY; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD 266 FEET TO THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE FOLLOWING THE NORTH AND EAST BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER WITH COURSES WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 780 FEET TO THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTERS CREEK AT ITS JUNCTION WITH ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE N89'44'E, 220 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH ALL WATER RIGHTS PERTAINING THERETO. SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN SECTION SEVEN (7), TOWNSHIP TEN (10) SOUTH, RANGE EIGHTY-FOUR (84) WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (AS SURVEYED) A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICUALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING 30' SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTER CREEK, (WHENCE THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEARS: S8829'40"W A DISTANCE OF 499.25 FEET); THENCE S08'03'41 "E ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD A DISTANCE OF 260.69 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY BANK OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER THE FOLLOWING THIRTEEN (13) COURSES: 1. S74'20'45"W A DISTANCE OF 63.86 FEET; 2. S23'49'22"W A DISTANCE OF 61.42 FEET; 3. S59.22'27"W A DISTANCE OF 61.71 FEET 4. S72'08'49"W A DISTANCE OF 43.05 FEET; 5. S78.05'13"W A DISTANCE OF 91.12 FEET; 6. N82'25'32"W A DISTANCE OF 65.31 FEET; 7. N60'40'18"W A DISTANCE OF 53.12 FEET; 8. N43'23'03"W A DISTANCE OF 79.12 FEET; 9. N21 *31'49"W A DISTANCE OF 35.19 FEET; 10. N55'43'43"E A DISTANCE OF 50.85 FEET; 11. N48'15'25"E A DISTANCE OF 62.81 FEET; 12. N17'05'12"E A DISTANCE OF 64.93 FEET; 13. N28'27'14"E A DISTANCE OF 136.43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BANK OF HUNTER CREEK; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY BANK N85'45'50"E A DISTANCE OF 238.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2.755 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. NOTES 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF TRUE NORTH DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS YIELDING A BEARING OF N89'53'49"E BETWEEN THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, A BLM BRASS CAP IN PLACE AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, A REBAR AND CAP L.S. NO. 2376 FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. 2. DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST 13, 2009, SEPTEMBER 1, 2010, ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHY AND TREE LOCATION ON FEBRUARY 2, 2011. 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS FIELD SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 311 AT PAGE 307, BOOK 512 AT PAGE 253, BOOK 348 AT PAGE 951, BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967, BOOK 292 AT PAGE 472, BOOK 568 AT PAGE 75, RECEPTION NO. 557260, RECEPTION NO. 501239, RECEPTION NO. 463751, FINAL PLAT OF TRUEMAN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PROJECT RECORDED IN BOOK 5 AT PAGE 70, DENVER RIO GRANDE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 3 AT PAGE 388 AS RECEPTION NO. 134450 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN. 5. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE GUARANTY FUND, INC., DATED AUGUST 18, 2010 (COMMITMENT NUMBER PC201008007311 FILE NO. PC10002778). 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (NAVD 29) REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION S159 HAVING A PUBLISHED ELEVATION OF 7715.64. 7. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 8. FLOOD INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097CO203 C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE WAS BASED ON DETERMINED ELEVATIONS SHOWN THEREON (NAVD 1929). 9. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS (NO8'00'00"W) ARE RECORD MEASUREMENTS. 10. ONLY THOSE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MARKED OUT AT THE TIME OF THE FIELD SURVEY ARE SHOWN. 11. OVERLAPS GENERATED BY REC. NO. 204516 (HAHN, LLC TO HINES) ARE NOT SHOWN BASED ON QUIET TITLE ACTION SHOWN IN REC. NO. 123616. SURVEYOR`S CERTIFICATE TO: MUSTANG HOLDINGS, LLC, ATTORNEYS TITLE GUARANTY FUND, INC., THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS," JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS IN 2005, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, A, 3, 4, 5, 7(a), 8, 10, 11(a)(b) and 13 OF TABLE A THEREOF. PURSUANT TO THE ACCURACY STANDARDS AS ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS AND IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF THIS CERTIFICATION, UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION, AS A LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, THE RELATIVE POSITIONAL ACCURACY OF THIS SURVEY DOES NOT EXCEED THAT WHICH IS SPECIFIED THEREIN. LINEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LEES THAN 1 PART IN 15,000. I7_�-is FRANK W. HARRINGTON, LS NO. 19598 CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY AT O'CLOCK .M., ON THE DAY OF A.D. 2010, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK PAGE RECEPTION NO. BY: CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY w U) U LL > : mw Z Z >00:j °o >` w o�;zF- Q YD U� -X<w LE0fr (D2m Ozo0w z0Nz o�2O 0)3 U)Dao w O>-LL�z � �z 0 o DxFfh _j LL] mOj SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I, FRANK W. HARRINGTON, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. FOR JACK C. ROWLAND, THAT SAID SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. FRANK W. HARRINGTON, L.S.NO. 19598 69 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH RANG E RA WEST OF THE 6TH P wA SLOPE LEGEND 9 . • COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO Ld REBAR & CAP-~ o I L.S.#20151 (FND) 0% - 19.99% SLOPE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 31 1 AT PAGE 307) BEGINNING AT A POST STANDING ABOUT 30 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTERS CREEK AND 50 FEET WEST FROM THE CENTER OF THE DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD TRACK, SAID POST BEING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL OF GROUND DEEDED TO SAID DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY BY THE HALLAM LAND COMPANY; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD 266 FEET TO THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE FOLLOWING THE NORTH AND EAST BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER WITH COURSES WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 780 FEET TO THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTERS CREEK AT ITS JUNCTION WITH ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE N89'44'E, 220 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH ALL WATER RIGHTS PERTAINING THERETO. SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN SECTION SEVEN (7), TOWNSHIP TEN (10) SOUTH, RANGE EIGHTY-FOUR (84) WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 20% - 29.99% SLOPE / / (AS SURVEYED) I / A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE <„��.� ��w�.�.; < X30% SLOPE / o SIXTH PRINCIPAL / MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICUALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 78 "�` COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN s.xE mN z �g32 / RAILROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING 30' SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTER CREEK, (WHENCE THE WEST olGo o w QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7 BEARS: S$8'29'40"W A DISTANCE OF 499.25 FEET); THENCE S08'03'41"E 0 o ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD A DISTANCE OF 260.69 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE ALONG THE m o NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY BANK OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER THE FOLLOWING THIRTEEN (13) COURSES: o GERALD D. HINES a� I MARC & KAREN FRIEDBERG 1. S74'20'45"W A DISTANCE OF 63.86 FEET; PARCEL N0. 273707200035 w � w a PARCEL NO. 273707200026 2. S23'49'22"W A DISTANCE OF 61.42 FEET; o O BOOK 766, PAGE 967 BOOK 348, PAGE 951 O 7g ' 3. S59°22'27"W A DISTANCE OF 61.71 FEET (DEED CALLS TO CENTER ~ ~ 0 4. S72"08'49"W A DISTANCE OF 43.05 FEET; \ EXISTING EDGE OF HUNTER CREEK) -0 5. S78'05'13"W A DISTANCE OF 91.12 FEET; OF WATER a ' 6. N82°25'32"W A DISTANCE OF 65.31 FEET; AUGUST 2009 7. N60°40'18"W A DISTANCE OF 53.12 FEET; WEST 1/4 CORNER / .66 ' C ' 8. N43'23'03"W A DISTANCE OF 79.12 FEET; i- 3� o / w SECTION 7 9. N21'31'49"W A DISTANCE OF 35.19 FEET; GAP 3" BLM BRASS CAP 6�OQ 31 12/ / AREA ' P.O.B. w ' 10. N55'43'43"E A DISTANCE OF 50.85 FEET; (FND) >��{ �s ye / / /��I� CD 11. N48'15'25"E A DISTANCE OF 62.81 FEET; c s6�/ � o REBAR &CAP ' REBAR &CAP R O / L.S.#19598 (SET) REBAR &CAP 12. N17'05'12"E A DISTANCE OF 64.93 FEET; L.S. #19598 (SET) OVERLAP H�l�� G (TYPICAL) AREA /238.99' / (TIE FROM 1/4 CORNER L.S.#2376 (FND) 13. N28'27'14"E A DISTANCE OF 136.43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BANK OF (YIELDING BEARING)- _ _ (_ _ _ N85'45 50 E - - - - ._ - _ _ _ _ _ �- N88.29'40'E 499.25'); HUNTER CREEK; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY BANK N85'45'50"E A DISTANCE OF 238.99 FEET TO THE POINT N- --749"E - - j '�- - - �'°� - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2.755 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. .a.2'� NOTES / N88.59'38"W 1 O NO. 4 REBAR & CAP (N88 160.00'), s' '� FENCE POOD L �---- o NES o -9 o y�F� L.S.#25947 (FND) 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF TRUE NORTH DET 1 S SHED < TBM ELEVATION: 7838.32 ERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS / LOLD / \ �v�o YIELDING A BEARING OF N89'53 49 E BETWEEN THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, A BLM BRASS CAP IN / WOOD / �0° 2�\ tSl PLACE AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967 OF FENCE _- / a•y 3 �� 's THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, A REBAR AND CAP L.S. NO. 2376 FOUND IN PLACE ZONE X I s STONE ® <o i �s \VERED CALLWINNIE, LLC AS SHOWN HEREON. pp, FIRE PIT i CO 8.2 o PARKING �'�� �� I PARCEL NO. 273707300010 WELL s.o 8.0 SHED �.��E RECEPTION NO. 501239 2. DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST 13, 2009. • �� LD WOOD � , ZO N E X � 1 STORY / -SST CHIMNEY .TONE I 3. THIS S N •( URVEY IS BASED ON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 311 AT PAGE 307 BOOK 512 AT PAGE 253 BOOK348 <v ENCE POST CONC. PATIO COTTAGE o r I AT PAGE 951, BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967, BOOK 292 AT PAGE 472, BOOK 568 AT PAGE 75, RECEPTION NO. /, ON NO. 501239, RECEPTION NO. 463751 FINAL s.4 513 557260RECEPTION PLAT OF TRUEMAN NEIGHBORHOOD /BANK OF ROARING ASPEN CENTER FOR �� �� / 2 ASPHALT x COMMERCIAL PROJECT RECORDED IN BOOK 5 AT PAGE 70, DENVER RIO GRANDE RAILROAD RIGHT -QF -WAY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES FORK RIVER 1f - WALK MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 3 AT PAGE 388 AS RECEPTION NO. 134450 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS / N PARCEL NO. 273707300801 SHOWN. DE YELOPI�I BOOK 568, PAGE 75 / �' o� '� D X I- EN CoQ AREA x �: ASPHALT 4 N THISPROPERTYIS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR . .. ROADWAY AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SH / OWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY TITLE COMPANY OF m THE ROCKIES, INC., DATED JULY 27, 2009 (COMMITMENT NUMBER 0702799-C). /OD _ = 5. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (NAVD 29) OD REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION S159 HAVING A PUBLISHED N 6�, `GRAVEL DRIVE. 2;' .:. ELEVATION OF 7715.64. ( \ ROARING \ 2 STORY WOOD _ FRAME HOUSE N m I o \ 6. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 1 � � c-Q� I 69 SHADY LANE `' P� 00 FORK RI R 0) \ �/ o rn 7. FLOOD INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY \ WATER W PANEL NO. 08097CO203 C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE WAS BASED SPIGOT\ 6O3 z ,o OS a I ON DETERMINED ELEVATIONS SHOWN THEREON (NAVD 1929). CIV rrl� X000 o! I 8. THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS N " BOOK 568, PAGE 75 / o \ �Fc ( 08 00 00 W) ARE RECORD MEASUREMENTS. REFERENCES CENTER ^ O D � OF ROARING FORK JIVER Z ci ` m� / 9. THE HIGH WATERLINE AND THE TOP OF SLOPE SHOWN HEREON WHERE DELINEATED BY GARY BEACH OF BEACH RESOURCES ON FEBRUARY 12, 2010. ZONE AE \ WATER \ a I ' LIMITS PER FEMA MAPS \ PUMP 10. 2' CONTOURS SHOWN HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM THE PITKIN COUNTY GIS. \ AND FIELD TOPOGRAPHY \ FROM ETBACK _/ o I'g36 � Tos 11. ZONE AE = 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY, ZONE X = AREA OUTSIDE OF 500 Y EAR FLOOD BOUNDARY. FROMETBACK _ / g40 I _ 12. THE GAP LABELED IN THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF THE PROPERTY IS A GAP BETWEEN THE SUBJECT \ EXISTING EDGE Tos wooD�'� / PROPERTY AND THE DEED FOR THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTHWEST. OF WATER AUGUST 2009 TOP OF FENCE -� i 13. THE OVERLAP LABELED IN THE NORTHERY CORNER OF THE PROPERTY IS A DEED OVERLAP BY THE sL0PIf To -S7 i PROPERTY TO THE NORTHWEST. E 2.755± ACRES I 14. DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE ALLOWANCES AND LIMITATIONS OF CITY OF ASPEN �` R �- PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. SERIES OF 2010, RECORDED AT BOOK �g5 N�GN. wP�E 83•$6' o ��NE O, ASW W o PAGE AS RECEPTION N0. ---------- ---> / WOOD -5742 ' CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL l PEDESTRIAN 0 I N2131'49"W 35.19' BRIDGE / 1�1 THIS PLAT OF THE 69 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER I OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, THIS DAY OF 2010. ISLAND IN 1 ' ^ w � N " o 6p'sro, ry BANK OF ROARING S Q�3 0$, / 8 � � ��' / � CITY OF ASPEN v_ FORK RIVER BOOK 292, PAGE 472 PARCEL NO. 273707352853 REFERENCES LOT 3, TRUEMAN NEIGHBORHOOD 1Z / O COMMERCIAL PROJECT \ N82-25 '32'w S�$'05'A3'tw g1 '' "ROARING FORK 'gI ER" 1 BOOK 5, PAGE 70 65.31' REBAR &CAP � ' `POO EXISTING EDGE \ L.S. #19598 (SET) OF WATER AUGUST 2009 \ --' CITY OF ASPEN PARCEL NO. 273707301851 BOOK 292, PAGE 472 7832 7834 I I GRAPHIC SCALE 30 Io 15 30 60 ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL CTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ( IN FEET ) BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN EARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 1 inch = 30 ft. TRICIA ARAGON, CITY ENGINEER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL THIS PLAT OF THE 69 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, THIS DAY OF . 2010. CHRIS BENDON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT THE OWNERS IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT PROPERTY SITUATED IN PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO SHOWN HEREON ACKNOWLEDGE THE ALLOWANCES AND LIMITATIONS OF CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REFERENCED IN NOTE NO. 14 ON THIS PLAN. EXECUTED THIS ----DAY OF ----------, A.D., 200--. BY: ------------------------------ OWNER BY: ---------------- ----------------------- OWNER BY: OWNER ------ CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE 120 THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY AT ___ - O'CLOCK ----.M., ON THE __-- DAY OF_____ ----------- A.D. 2010, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK -----, PAGE ------- RECEPTION N0 BY: ---------------------- ------ -_ BY: CLERK AND R ECO R D ERDEPUTY ---------------------- w J U -w Z 0 90 l� o jOz� ow_E-- ob Q Y� Uo EO r- Z�<W to�2m oo N7w z� N QOW2 DE�w z U- - DO U1D�2 p o wOOZ DLUT O (oo O CIt cZwWO CY I- Jw co0ycD NLLQa� QU (y) U Liz _ImUw 0 L UZ WZ a O W � z mLL0LL z w \ a x Q U _ U k Q 14 0Q O U V z r�"� V W U) Vin -j 9 0) N UI _Z O,(j) W CD O I Z F - ON v O U �h V U 6 Z w = z W }a`° U Wla!? a j0 z O CD mz �JSm O " c� z U = 4 rx V x WZ a O W � z 'Q a z O 0Q O V r�"� V W U) w -j 9 0) IL U) UI PROJECT NO. 2091640.00 I OF 'I AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL REVIEW FOR A BRIDGE REPLACEMENT FOR MUSTANG HOLDINGS II 69 SHADY LANE ASPEN, CO Submitted by: Mustang Holdings II February 16, 2015 Prepared by: GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS 314D ABC Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-1286 Contact: Janet Leverson 69 Shady Lane, Aspen, CO - Google Maps rryy Address 69 Shady Ln moo. A c Aspen, GO 81611 cn Ha7, r. rv_ d e4 � L'iaii f]i _.yle Rd. •- �cd PI .�L 7 Co FO LIS 5i- "t by Ln A orp� 'V'Ji• �d� R6 �.Q •O 0 !:cliJ,rao;,an k� a SIIE i �w ri �•svia st .: Pearl ct a � � o'o Can, Lj�e St N•f7u.o St y' �� � c Iprno 19 i 1!,a'jliT N i+ S/ W,17ar1 Sj_ IN.4aGh�nzs y 82 11 Zi ruts. d-mme Aspen n - $ Aapen `a peepcY,e 11 .liar 11 jyJ'mari A, Perk `�'ga;anca r O� ere He Is., +'e m C J C Page 1 of 1 Get Google Maps on your phone Text the word"GMAPS"to466453 a Qu.rv,� ti a G Cnor'q Chn at A.�ri A ) n Ski r' f C N �rrn.laln °nper pye 7ne Cant W Yir n1 a Go? ©2011 Google - 2-2 http://maps.google. coJn/maps?meq&source=s_q&h1=en&geocode=&q=69+Shady+Lane,+... 10/11/2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION A. Vicinity Map B. Introduction II. PROJECT SITE / EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 Ill. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3 IV. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS— COMMON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 4 V. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS — NON -CONFORMING STRUCTURES 4 VI. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS - STREAM MARGIN REVIEW STANDARDS 4 VII. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS—SPECIAL REVIEW 7 VIII. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS— LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 8 IX. APPENDIX A Exhibit 1, Land Use Application Form Exhibit 2, Pre -Application Conference Summary Exhibit 3, Proof of Ownership Exhibit 4, Permission to Represent Exhibit 5, HOA Compliance Form Exhibit 6, Signed Fee Agreement Exhibit 7, Dimensional Requirements Form X. APPENDIX B Exhibit 1, Site Improvement Survey Exhibit 2, Previous Approvals: Stream Margin Review IX. APPENDIX C Exhibit 1, Proposed Bridge Design Exhibit 2, Proposed Site Plan Exhibit 3, Proposed Landscape Plan X. APPENDIX D Exhibit 1, Flood Report Exhibit 2, Construction Management Plan Exhibit 3, Flood Plain Development Permit Application (CO) Exhibit 4, Wetland Delineation Report 2 INTRODUCTION The following application for Special Review includes requests for variances from the Stream Margin Review for a bridge replacement at 69 Shady Lane in Aspen, Colorado (see Pre - Application Conference Summary, Exhibit 2, Appendix A). The location of the project site is depicted on the Vicinity Map on the previous page. The application is submitted pursuant to Chapter 26.435.040 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations by Mustang Holdings II (hereinafter "Applicant"), the owners of the property (see Letter: Exhibit 3, Appendix A). Permission for Galambos Architects to represent the Applicant is attached as Exhibit 4, Appendix A. II. PROJECT SITE / EXISTING CONDITIONS The project site is legally described as a parcel of land situated in Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6'" P.M. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. The parcel ID number is 273707300012. The property lies at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Hunter Creek in the Zone District of R-30 (Low -Density Residential). The 69 Shady Lane project is currently under construction. Permitted improvements include a new single family home, an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), site landscaping, and utility work. The property is bound on the west and south by the Roaring Fork River, on the east by Shady Lane, and on the north by Hunter Creek. As the Roaring Fork River enters the property, the river splits into two channels to create an island on the south side of the property. A site improvement survey is attached (see Exhibit 1, Appendix B). Due to the proximity to the Roaring Fork and Hunter Creek, a Stream Margin Review was required prior to the project development and the Resolution is attached (see Exhibit 2, Appendix B). A timber and log pedestrian bridge exists on the site that crosses the channel of the Roaring Fork River to access the island on the south side of the property (see Exhibit 3, Appendix B) III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT It is proposed to remove the current bridge and replace it with a new pedestrian bridge. The new bridge as designed by Galambos Architects and structurally engineered by Big R Bridge (see Exhibit 1, Appendix C) will provide a secure means across the river. In terms of flood impact, the new bridge will improve the existing condition because it will raise the span of the bridge entirely out of the floodplain. The proposed bridge adds concrete abutments that have a minimum profile but still have been designed to withstand scouring and all floodplain impacts. A site plan is included as Exhibit 2, Appendix C and a landscape plan showing riparian restoration and re -vegetation around the new bridge is included as Exhibit 3, Appendix C. IV. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS — Common Development Review Procedures The Applicant has reviewed the Common Development Review Procedures and understands the process. A Pre -Application Conference was attended and the summary is attached as Exhibit 2, Appendix A. If required, neighborhood outreach will be performed and a summary included in this application. V. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS — Non -Conforming Structures Per Sections 26.312.030 A and B, a non -conforming structure may be continued with normal maintenance. Per Section 26.312 E, any portion of a non -conforming structure which becomes physically unsafe or unlawful due to lack of repairs and maintenance and which is declared unsafe or unlawful by a duly authorized city official, but which an owner wishes to restore, repair or rebuild shall only be restored, repaired or rebuilt in conformity with the provisions of the Title. Per Section 26.312 F2, any non -conforming structure which is purposefully demolished or destroyed may be replaced with a different structure only if the replacement structure is in conformance with the current provisions of the Title or unless the replacement of the nonconformity is approved pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26.430, Special Review. The applicant is pursuing the demolition and replacement of a non -conforming structure (bridge) through this Special Review. VI. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS — Stream Margin Review Standards The Applicant is requesting variances from the Standards for the new bridge. The Standards and the proposed development's compliance with or variance from (in bold text) are summarized below: A. Section 26.435.040(C)(1): It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation... See the attached Bridge Flood Report generated by Sopris Engineering and included as Exhibit 1, Appendix D. The analysis shows that the proposed new bridge complies with the City of Aspen's Zero Rise Ordinance, and in fact demonstrates that the base flood elevation (BFE) at the bridge will be lowered slightly. The Review Standard has therefore been met. B. Section 26.435.040(0)(2): The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board and the Roaring Fork River Greenway plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable... A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement," This standard was addressed with the Stream Margin Review for the home (Resolution No 13, Series of 2010) therefore, this Standard does not apply. C. Section 26.435.040(C)(3): There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review... This standard addresses a building envelope which appears to not be appropriate for a bridge. We believe therefore that this standard does not apply. D. Section 26.435.040(C)(4): The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Prior to construction the contractor shall install the project fencing and install sediment and erosion control. Silt fence will be installed at the toe of disturbance, the limits of disturbance will be the minimum area needed for crane setup and for excavation. BMPs shall be utilized to ensure that sediment does not leave the construction site. Refer to the CMP narrative attached Exhibit 2, Appendix D. The review Standard has been met. E. Section 26.435.040(C)(5): Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency There is to be no alteration or relocation of the water course therefore, this Standard does not apply. However, a Flood Plain Development Permit is completed and ready for submittal and is attached as Exhibit 3, Appendix D. F. Section 26.435.040(C)(6): A guarantee is provided in the event a watercourse is altered or relocated. It is not the intent of this project to alter the water course. Care was taken in the design of the bridge and the intent is to provide a more stable bridge that will not enter the water course. Therefore, this standard has been met. G. Section 26.435.040(C)(7): Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the 100 -year flood plain No federal or state permits are necessary. The City of Aspen is the floodplain manager so they will review the Flood Plain development permit, pending Special Review approval. No wetlands will be disturbed so no Army Corps permit is required. The Flood Plain Development Permit is attached as Exhibit 3, Appendix D therefore, the review standard has been met. 5 H. Section 26.435.040(C)(8): There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive.. The highwater, top of slope and 15 feet from top of slope lines are illustrated on the 69 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review Plan (see attached exhibit 2, Appendix B) recorded 7/22/2010. The existing bridge sits at the top of slope delineation on the mainland side and just above the "highwater" line on the island. The proposed bridge has been extended approximately 5 feet to clear the established wetlands boundary but while the bridge clears the top of slope and the highwater line, it still sits within 15 feet of the top of slope. The intent of this standard is to "protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability". In response to this intent, the proposed bridge avoids the delineated wetlands, the footprint of the bridge foundation has been minimized as much as possible, all measures will be taken to protect existing vegetation and new plantings will be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City (see landscape plan exhibit 3, Appendix C). A variation from this Standard is requested. 1. Section 26.435.040(C)(9) All development outside the fifteen foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five degree angle... The proposed bridge lies entirely within the fifteen foot setback from the top of slope. A variation from the Standard, therefore, is requested. J. Section 26.435.040(C)(10) All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope... Lighting is proposed on the underside of the bridge, it will be downcast and the source hidden however, the light will be shining down into the water. See Exhibit 1, Appendix C. A variation from the Standard, therefore, is requested. K Section 26.435.040(C)(11) There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Beach Environmental has completed a wetland evaluation and delineation for the property. See attached Exhibit 4, Appendix D therefore, the review Standard has been met. VII. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS—Special Review A. Section 26.430.040 (A): Dimensional requirements This standard seems to address a building which appears to not be appropriate for a bridge. We believe therefore that this standard does not apply. B. Section 26.430.040 (8): Replacement of nonconforming structures: 1. The proposed development shall comply with the conditions of Subsection 26.430.040.A We believe this standard does not apply. 2. There exist special characteristics unique to the property which differentiate the property from other properties located in the same zone district. The bridge has been in existence for quite some time and without it, there would be no access to part of the property. Therefore, a variation from the Standard is requested. 3. No dimensional variations are increased, and the replacement structure represents the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the property: The proposed bridge is approximately 5' longer to avoid wetlands and to get the bridge up out of the flood plain. We feel the condition has been improved and therefore, a variation from the Standard is requested. 4. Literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the zone district would cause unnecessary hardship upon the owner by prohibiting reasonable use of the property. We believe the dimensional provisions of the zone district relate to buildings and not a bridge therefore, we believe this standard does not apply. C. Section 26.430.040 (C): Reduction of public amenity We believe that this standard does not apply. D. Section 26.430.040 (D): Off-street parking requirement We believe that this standard does not apply. E. Section 26.430.040 (E): Utility and delivery service area provisions We believe that this standard does not apply. F. Section 26.430.040 (F): Subdivision design standards We believe that this standard does not apply. G. Section 26.430.040 (G): ADU design standards We believe that this standard does not apply. 7 H. Section 26.430.040 (H): Wireless telecommunications facilities We believe that this standard does not apply. 1. Section 26.430.040 (1): Affordable housing unit standards We believe that this standard does not apply. VIII. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS — Low -Density Residential This section does not apply. APPENDIX A FIN rr_101RIMIa01kIPM lWakiIII PLa_vINZ] PROJECT: Name: /l/lG[$'-i1/%+.1(E:' {6L'0/'J�s Location: ^ cog srw r (Indicate street addre s, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 27 3 70 �,� Q0 Of 2 - APPLICANT: APPLICANT: Name: {M4/�f� jiSGolr� S Address: -715- N Sr& -f Z,6 Phone #: 2/ V- 720 — � % REPRESENTATIVE: Name: s `7 "f -t7 rS* Address: �j 1 (� f4175(f_ q Phone#: -/ 70 - In / - /Z j'(" TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) C-xisnPk_, Ryt,ac-t� -A PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, mod fications, etc.) ceq'kc1--! a1< (tj/Z 146f' Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre -Application Conference Summary Attachment #l, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment 44, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre -application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. eq-/16IT 2 CITY OF ASPEN PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Sara Nadolny, 970.429.2739 DATE: 12.12.2014 PROJECT: 69 Shady Lane REPRESENTATIVE: Janet Leverson, 970.429.1286 REQUEST: Special Review DESCRIPTION: 69 Shady Lane is located in the R-30 zone district with a PD overlay. The property is located at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Hunter Creek, and is therefore subject to the City's regulations regarding stream margin review. In 2010 the property underwent Stream Margin review via the Planning and Zoning Commission. A Resolution was approved by P&Z designating a new top of slope and building envelope for the property (Reception No. 572119). The Resolution also outlined the effective lot area of the property for the purpose of calculating floor area. A plat was also filed in 2010 (Reception No. 273126) reflecting these new changes. At this time the Applicant is interested in a complete renovation of an existing bridge on the property. The bridge spans across a tributary of the Roaring Fork River, between the developed area of the parcel and an island to the south. According to Stream Margin review, development outside of a designated building envelope is considered a structural non -conformity, which may be maintained, but upon demolition it cannot be replaced. The Applicant would like to pursue a complete demolition and redevelopment of this bridge by going through a Special Review process. A public hearing will be required before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Once the application has been deemed complete and a date hearing date assigned, the Applicant will be sent instructions for noticing requirements prior to the public hearing. The application must include responses to Stream Margin Review Standards and Special Review, as indicated in the sections below. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www. aspen pitkin. com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%201and%20use%20a pp%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www. aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use- Code/ Land Use Code Section(s 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.312.030 Non -conforming structures 26.435.040.0 Stream Margin Review Standards 26.435.04.E Special Review 26.710.080 Low -Density Residential (R-30) Review by: Staff for complete application Engineering, Parks ASLU Special Review 69 Shady Lane 273707300012 Public Hearing: None Planning Fees: Planning Deposit — one-step review involving P&Z, $3,250 for 10 hours Referral Fees: Engineering, $250 for 1 hour of review time Parks, $975 flat fee Total Deposit: $4,475 (additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour; additional engineering hours over deposit are billed at a rate of $265/hour) To apply, submit the following information: ❑ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. ❑ Pre -application Conference Summary (this document). ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ HOA Compliance form (Attached) ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. ❑ Written responses to all review criteria. ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: ❑ 9 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. ❑ Total deposit for review of the application. ❑ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. ITS Gary A. Wright gaw@wrightlasalle.com 23 February 2015 Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Proof of Ownership Mustang Holdings II, LLC To Whom it May Concern: 715 West Main Street, Suite 201 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone: (970) 925-5625 Facsimile: (970) 925-5663 I am writing this letter on behalf of my client, Mustang Holdings II, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, for which I am one of two Managers. This letter is given to satisfy the Proof of Ownership requirement of my client's Application. Mustang Holdings II, LLC, is the owner of real property located at 69 Shady Lane, in Aspen, Colorado; described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a post standing about 30 feet south of the south bank of Hunters Creels and 50 feet west from the center of the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad track, said post being at the northwest corner of parcel of ground deeded to said Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company by the Hallam Land Company; thence southerly parallel with the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad 266 feet to the north bank of the Roaring Fork River; thence following the north and east bank of the Roaring Fork River with courses westerly and northerly 780 feet to the south bank of Hunters Creek at its junction with Roaring Fork River; thence N. 89'44'E. 220 feet to the place of beginning; Situate, lying and being in Section Seven (7), Township Ten (1o) South, Range eighty-four (84) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado. Based on my review of the records on the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office as well as a Title Insurance Policy given by Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC, I confirm that title to the property 69 Shady Lane property is vested in Mustang Holdings II, LLC. Copy to Steven W. Caple Sincerely, WRI HT 4, LASALLE, LLP By: Gary A. Wright www.wrightlasalle. com GA/4161T V Mustang Holdings II, LLC February 13, 2015 Ms. Sara Nadolny City of Aspen, Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 69 Shady Lane, Aspen, Colorado 81611 - "Special Review" Dear Ms. Nadolny: Mustang Holdings II, LLC hereby authorizes John Galambos and Janet Leverson of Galambos Architects, Inc. to act on our behalf and to represent us with all aspects of planning and development with the City of Aspen on the above referenced project. We have included with this correspondence proof of ownership and the planning fee. Applicant: Mustang Holdings II, LLC 715 West Main Street, Suite 201 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Mr. Steve Caple - Manager Mr. Billy Ray Johnson - C.M. Telephone: 214-720-1688 Applicant's Representative: Galambos Architects, Inc. Aspen Airport Business Center, Bldg. 134, Suite D Aspen, Colorado 81611 Mr. John Galambos - Principle Ms. Janet Leverson - Project Architect Telephone: 970-429-1286 If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to call. Very.truly yours, t. tis Steven W. Caple Manager Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. subject Property: m00% XAMP i Ca. SIO/ j -M-6 "N1 /d 04 W pt4 I, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) 9 This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: — " -L � date: t 1 Owner printed name: Inl . I' Afe} or, Attorney signature: Attorney printed name: date: April, 2013 City of Aspen 1 130 S. Galena St. 1 1970) 920-5090 e><ach /bcT- (� an Agreement to Pay Application Fees I Property MUSTANG f7�®'rD/Na5r_ one No.: 2fyj ?Qp /6465 Owner ("I"): Email: Address of 69 Sh'AOr LANE Billing /roll eels! STREET Property: ASpEM, CO . Address: 001,r6!.0000 o (subject of f (send bills here) dj41_eA 5, 7X0 70Z61 application) 40/6// I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ a,ZS70 deposit for 10 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $ Z 70 deposit for ! hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property; Owner: jry 4 Chris Bandon Community Development Director Name a City Use: Title:. Fees Due: $ Received: $ Project: Applicant: Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: MEM ATTACHMENT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed.• Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: N/9 Floor Area: Principal bldg. height: Access. bldg. height: On -Site parking: % Site coverage: % Open Space: Front Setback: Rear Setback: Combined F/R: Side Setback: Side Setback Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing: Required: Proposed: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Distance Between Existing Buildings Required.• Proposed: Required: Proposed: Existing non -conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: APPENDIX B ALTA/ACSM LAN® TITLE & PARTIAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 7, ` SII TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. \,' i �' COUNTY OF PITKi N, STATE OF COLORADO TREE CHART _ y L 1 • {( T 1 TREE TYPE SRE OF LCNIFE9Ws B' 1] .'NN. R "..A A CO GI Ie n/{.'ll:'�J,�•`' �S 1. s R@PA k GAP- °PsiAe 1 e ca�vFBas 11 •r(•>/4 .E'M1Y''- B)� M]-.• \ -i v•i _L Es nmSl tFCO) �_J 6 wmrERWs r 9 i _ 1"=.... 1. /c / ] MORONS IS' 11 Y f"71�F AAI 4',S Ll'rvm �( �'I •V- `\ ,�t'i / 9 OEdOYW x •• R.lr�-�,,>•~J•,''�'SrP �V �`� \4 J I / / 10 OEGOVWS IS' 1 •� I"$} I \ r Ail `. p I / / iz oEuouws IS x \ 1 e� ♦: l v 11 i / } DEawc°S 6' 11 ai Par / IS OCMVNas s' i] O;1 �. GRAPHIC SCALE I6 EGooaas z A E aceoouws a ."�i.'_SM r\ kI I oEaouws }e' c a m 19 OEGVYWS 0' I] 1 /((\s` �1, �''�. ti' ♦ • 0.`L r T n 6 m oEGouWs lo' N MR k HARM FR EORERG PANLEL EIB. )}A]c]2WOrz6 31 OEOOYWs S- I: k M \ (�� L f�. •- 1. 1 Heb 00 IL f I I 33 OECTVWS fi' 1 \ \ \ 0 1 q.1 'y �^•. 1 -+ GRWD 0. NINES OWK ]fi E 96] PARCEL. xA3n]o]S251 / uDt eo it BDC:f ]4B, PAGE 951 I OfOWWS6 f0. F BG ED, (DFOF v. TO LEN]FR E 1 Zfi pEtlOUWs x lB' 11 I LII 1\ , ':. \ `\,� �; >: •, 1;'. �.� �`n: ti•:::• OF BATED, OF NNx, ER (REEK) / 3) EOHIRRw9 •• I 1Po9 ' 0,}SS//� I I 9 UEGWWS }' B' VI1.1' -MAP � \ _ - - - Aa8 � � I I EEGOJW. o' ii 1' .1000' \1 Lysj CAP,/ 5 C A •,�y(EA P O B� 1 I 1 DEG.DJWS s 11 as 63 GREEK iENAfOSM1S I }Z 6RODUWs it 9EaP A EN OVERLAP UNTE'R i �/ /I II E s IAT) I Ayi6 (mol }} Ws J mE ERE, N" CC 1 5 OEC DUWs .' II Asr I/4 cP'IxFR-^R-�/_ _ _ _ _IYIEIDING BEARING) Lz lnv5cu)� 'MO' _ µ N95'45'5D"E 'rL5B.99 - 1 \ L _ _ _ EGWas ADETCH ] 199 E _ ��� - �`xB 4 0® k cPP 5J OEGw0U9 Il B' I. A. BW ERA55 CAP 4 ]B OEGOJWS IY I (IXB) ' ' ,. E vni4 xlu AAOxk ]9 .WECA IS' S w oEwuws i' z. u LEGEND /I -.Y 1 nnL \���TI iL. Y 9i n -A1-11r i ZONE X } / II CAM 2"1IE. LLc POA@ P.IE�lE 1 ��ml P aEc�nml rva solD. ]oWlo a BERNARD }xrz. } O NEu / V47 0� RDERAWS W BATES SAW OFF I }/ ap.- FORCE Pasr / i 'con ME , / I C.IMONs W WAIEfl PUVP / / SB OEOBVWs 4' IB i9M!((K ACARINE ,4� •� Cd ` EI OE(IOVWS x ]' 19 Y TELEPHONE PEDESTAL {p R( PREA m' j 1 l a' 1 I SZ BEER s /,'ROCARWNoL 'TCHE TRY �" 1 fF t, \ s5 BEGBUOus a OVANEAa BIECMED 01 M@s ! I / 1 1 \ I I� ' VF/CO _ A T \ \\ / 1 xwr' it , S5 AC CRI e AEW PENCE /\) 1 -/ _ J 1 1 \ \\ (1\`�1 !:/ /.11 1, 1 n EGDuaBIviR B I I / /' \ 11 \ \ _ _-i BEEWVOJS 1.1 PR VA BOWAp LKEHiE 59 LMIFEAWS a EGDv0U5 M@ I r BOOK A E xE we s rz5 v /SPEC@TCN 14 IOx])4 I/ I l P'P ; \ GRArEL o vE s/4Y /-„'! ' 't I` i m0. A IEFT. N PACE ]6E CCP�WS e cWlrwas THE" L NfcEnnox uo lBBu) 63 MAWS Sc ![� l / \ 2EiGRY WOW t ePOSERS 11 } CWBFEA 6' 1 q\ / \6 1 1\\ 695RPOY WIE \�`\\\1 \�I 66 BE mVWS l4' II `a DEGW I " / ;TATO-y \\ \�\ � , 2.455± Ac. �\ \ \ � \ MST 1. I 10 oEE�o S 14- 11 z Wr ry ED. NA, PALE ]5 / A \\\\ \ \ \ C_gan I I ]I ORI0YOJ5 24' 2 RE]rnENEEs cENMR / \ \\ \ p9=' n ofowouss IS- i OF fl.uuxc FOxu RIVER / / ZONE AE' r\ '°m\\� \ 1 1 \m v I ]4 .EwJ I'll li / - \ )NIS PFR IEYA NNS 0 • �da4 I kA6`�y�j . B MONARCH EARACHR'DUPRL sriolEs �6,1F py \ P \ 4 p� \ R i1• a PANCEL 140. 2)]]0]]W001 ./ %� " \ \\`� CA/ \ \ \�}'�' 1 J I NOTE I S I ` )9 BEGWWS 15 11 BOOK SFS, PAGE ]5 / rj•L y I f / 1' N 00 OECIW Ws IZ' x CAI 04E //-MACNARA E / JGVRi x009) \\ �\ \ \` _ /� _\ / / I 0} II CCAPARwS B' ROARING \ _ / / I m BEB.us 6• E i FORK RIVER \ _ <'ffi '�/ I es WGIOFERAS I5' I,- PEDENSMIRATF PH \ `l �y I I 90 BEGWwS B" 11 I I \ N21'JI'99'W 35.19' P ! �I I 9} BEG0uW5 I' I: EGBUWs I` II \ \ 3 ` 'I I M OEWMWE e. 'I / Is W6 ♦ 11 WXIFFPW9 '.I CISLAND "" / I - - I 97 CONIFERW. R 1: \ a / 90 CWJANWs r 11 IS "CON EWW5 1 0 G5 ' IE CATARACTJ. HNCATARACTII I \ \ GJ• / I- I Ox OEgOUmWWS R 4 IF \ I1WD 1,p x®M A CAPy161�\ j / / "I I la4 <IXIIFFAWS 6' V \ LS /1959615E1) SENEGA \ \ \ \ 1' IRS oca0AW9 24' B' \ \ 49 VI Sh9 /j \ / / R 108 . W55 1w 1� N6tl' sT1011\- I CITY OF MAN I IBR 4alPmw ! 9 \ \.TO%M. Au`BF POOIllYC 430 / / '9 PMCEL NO. 275707353853 TO OEOOVWs 15' 2 l{' W MRAC BWK x9x. PPE 472 IG 'LOT a, TRUMAN IIB4NBOHNERS I 111 PAXI%RW9 1, \ J•, _ REFFAENCES 5 CANCER AL PROJECT 112 DECmUWS }' B STB'05'13•Wi112 i / jOANNG FORK NKR' I O A. 5, PAGE ]0 I INI R OEOOUO 5 10' II \ J}•1V 65.51' MS OEGW Ws II BfGWO NA .1 ANTSA4f \ \ _ _/ / 117 59" 11 A UCETsr SOo9 \ \ \ � / I I I'Dca9@AWs as' r. ' 119 CFCIWWs x" I: 130 WIFfAW9 xI1' '' \ \ /L3NEA5PE11 I I 131 CWIfE9Ws x' \ I / FAR ON x91PACEA72SCOI I I]2 [WIPFRWS 16' 9 121 BWIFFAWS 11 .Y0.. 6 NI ml Aw I OF Np Nz °ops R w t SP E Bpeg PERTY PRODESCRIPTION Ca 30T, (PER GEED RECORDED IN BOOK31f AT PAGEzV �DA m SOAR AT A POST S.I..0 ABOST AD FEET SW)H OF INE SWM BARN OF IND V ¢° -jm4p M NESS CR EN AND 50 FEET NEsi MEN SNE ENTER OF ME DOPER A NO p SmIU�i s G BRANDS M"BOAD MAN. SAO POST I SHM AT ME ARMAR IN CERAM CF PAPER OF SMAN 0 OEEOED 10 S.OFNMA AND AD DOWSE fl.YlA0P0 COYPPNY -'ME WE MID RIO 1' ALLAM VNOCWP.WY'r MORE SWMUYY PARIWM OENYFR i0 NCRM EARN Of ME ROARING FGBN RHEA: }m S. BRANDS FABROAO 366 FEtT ME WANWO INE NORM AND EAST BANK OF ME ACCRUE FAIR %VEA MIH ERASES MESIFRLY ANO NWMERLY ME FEE] TO ME SWM BAIIX CF XlM1FR5 CA. ATT AMCTW MM SCARAB FPL( PI1ER THENCE N69W E 330 FEET i0 C ME PLACE OF BEGNNWG iWEM@ MM ALL WAIFA P OMD PEATACHAS TH I° 22g EMNAIE TWO AND DEXO A ARW,Y SUCH (]), TDYMSNP TELE (0) E.M.RARLE � .E.m FOUR (04) ACT OF ME SLAW IMMOIAL N.V. � IS i PROPERTY DESCRIPTION m (A3311RVEYEO) � a A PAACR W AND 9MAn0 Al ME WEST NW CF SECRW ], WANANT 10 W o SWM RNIN W AN, MME SM1M PRINGPAL MFAIOWI. CWxtt OF As STAR OF COMOMACI CMR 1.0. BPC, YORE PMTWALLY D@C WC13 GCm CWYENORH AT A PANT ON ME ASTEALY R WT -OF WAY OF ME CRACE Alm NO CFANIF RUMEN AMLPOAO EAID ARM ALE. BLWG,M SWMEALY K ME B SWM DANA OF NOMEE dEFR (AN." ME NEST WARIER CORNER OF SND SECPDx ] SEMS RIA 0 STONES K 49925 FEET} R' CAM SRAV Y CA i ALWO ME AST FRY SGML CF WAY OF ME OBS. AND AR LRAHDE ASIEAN RNIAOAD A OIS)ANCF CF MIOIR FEET i0 A PANT ON ME NORMFALY BZCF ME TRAINING FOER SAAM MENCE ALMIO ME AR MEALY AND EASTERLY BATIK OF W SMO C.A. FOP% APER ME ..A. I-) LW RSES: FQ � .EASE, 45'W A OWANEE IS. FFR; D 3 1. All A D WANES CF 6143 EER: x3r. A DISTANCE W 61 A PER O 5 5]29849 W A C NATE DF 4]05 EER: z 5 L]A951]•W A DISTANCE OF 9112 FEET 6 NES,SN'YW A 0 ANWCY OF OS ]I FEET: ] AIRIW B'W A MSTMICE OF 5} Iz FEET. A 14132 051 A D MANCE OF ]913 FEET. 9, N31']149'W A CRIAN E °F }SP .1; I0. XSS4} U Y A OSTANCE OF 5005 ROLE aI M815xrE A DISTANCE OF SYe POET, IS Nn051YE A(IOF 6<11 AFAA1111 OF A BANW. OF 1]64] POET. iO A P -IT' GN ME SWMERLY H WNW CMIX MENCE IFAWIA SAM NERE Y BARN NR515.50'E A OISrN6E BY .1 POET M BE P,NI OF RFf SMD PPACR CORMAINNO S.Y. ACRES, YORE OR LEES U NOTES Z T. BASIS OF BEAPAR FOR MIS ESFOBY Is A SECOND OF TER NORM OETFANWED W BY LAS 0 EWHATWIS MNXG A BOARD M N09'.VVIE BETIMEN ME NEST (4 COMET OF EECTW ]. A BW BMSS CAP W PUCE AND ME SOYMAsi Z UI N COW OF MAT PROPERTY REAMERS w SON AS AT PALE 857 OF ME I'CHN WCNtt CIERA AND RECEIRMS OTIC[ A HMO AND CAP LS NO, 35]6 F O N PUCEAD ... T.E. 0 0 W 2 DATE M SHRAYR AUWsi IJ 3009, SEPRECREA 1 ZOM• AREMONAL N D IOPCWA Y1 AND M2 LOCAREA ON FEBRUMY ; 201 D V u S. °NEAR NI . CAR TY PEAFMN M s °m AIRYCY nFAC O s }RVOT FFR 0.14 ; yj ! 3 VIA 1 MIT CLAYEY IS NOR AN GEED RESEED W SOON 311 AT PAGE M], BPoK 512 AT PACE SO, BWK NO AT PALE 951. AWN 366 AT PARE 967. BOCK 39x AT z Z't b � PACE 472, BOAC DID AT PAC£ 75. RECEPTOR NO.55]360 REUPTW NO � � I� u Q 6 BDIP39, AEL@T0.Y NA 46])51. R14 PEAT R, RICAN.NBLNe0PHW0 CNYERdk PPAfCT COMM PI ..5 AT PARE ]0, .... AIR ..BE p = 'n W N p MS OMB S AT PAS, }OB AS WEEP. NAP SCANNED IN B •J v, D 3N50ANO E.M.A XO P N. A PUCE AS sxOMl. II..,L ] ii m AT THIS I.M.tt A EC,ACT RESERVATWS HOWCOMI WVe .. AND Z NO EISESEWS OE' RECORD BR AEF PND IXCEPTWS TO MME MEAN IN ME MME COW"WENi PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TWE WMA Y,... dG OAT D IN Tm5 = W 0 AUW ST C BAR (CW W.' ANSWER PUDIM8007311 RIE NO 'RCOOO77M 6 DEYAT0N5 SNOW A REON AAE BASES W NdtM AHEM.µ VEAR4LL EARTH OF U z 1929 M. z9) AEFTAENCED FROM XPT4rM CYST NOCATG } ORA) -- S WHOWAAK A.. ANSI . NOT . A AuWC C EM£Y W OF YYNC. ]. CGNLWR IMFAVAL EWA, 1 FW[ V 6. FLWO INCH..W NRB TAMEN WOR {OMA TION P'T'ANCE RALE NAP OF x F WA CHUM, CORI PANR N0, DO ... C030} GMM AN ""'W"' DATE OF AS ♦ 19B]. 1W YESE fL000 UNE WAS BASED W °E1E 'I. DNATCNA SUSHI TREAEDI (UAW NAZI). B. ME BEAANGS AND .11YANCES EHDAN .I PAAdMISE (IIBeW4PWN ME RECORD WMARESENTS 10, CHU ROSE UNDE9GAWRD CHORES AMAPA WT AT ME TUE OF ME NDC P. ME AWAY. SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE TO, WETMC HOMDMOS, LLE, ATMNEIS TRE WMMtt NNE, INC. WE IS W COMITY MAT THIS MAP OR %AT AND ME SURVEY ON ANN IT IS BASED ADS MADE m ACCOROANTE MM ME -MINNUM SWAMPS INSTAL RECOIRwENTE FOR LLu/ASU IM. -TQE SAARI ,P]IHQ, ESTASUEHED MB AERMET BY &,A AND NSP. YI .1. AND SHLXOES NEW 1. A. ,} 4. 5, TABLE A sMPAES. PVRSLMi TO WE ACWRACY STM Ap OM.S M AOCP1R10Y MlA M0 A EiiECT ON ME GATE OF MIS CERTNCANOR, URDERNNEE NRMM U J In O wm SVRVEItlR AEaMCIED A COMOROS MAT A MY PROFESSORIAL OMNI 9,¶ W CF MI5 SURVEY OEs J 0Q I- V MA RALY WE STATE OF C.C. M W IIDi IXCEFD MAL WYDI Is SPECRIED MFADII. UNFAR fAflCR OF CLOSURE IS LEES N V, D = MM T PAST m 140. , K Z og, -01 o 0 0 DATE: qu6f ;¢ ._: zw UILZ 195' s 9590 1'¢.� a d � IL fAM1N W. NMANCi011. Ls ANAL LARDS Q CLERKAND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE MI. PCW WAS FUR FEE RECCA. IN ME OWES IME C.N MO IECAI ER OF IL MUCLWN_U., E,1 ME _DAY OF AN. PROJECTNO. p IiDE. A IS 0 ISS¶IP0 oM MAN IIY ztotsss.Ro-t BY CIMA AO IEENAER I OF SURRATTRB STA£EMEM JAR, THEY ON T. ROYAAND,NTHAT SAID 6U KY WAS ESPAR 0RI TPA, 6BYOME ORW. HATERESE UNDEER MY SUPEpNSON I. BAND RESPONSIBLE dMGE AM MAT IT IS TRUE Ni0 CORRECT TO ME BEST OF MY III AND KNMAIDGE h -Ie � -- .ANN 'A AMR, L 9 mS 69 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SLOPELEGEND 1�%4 E JI GR - 19.992 SLOPE 9e' 4Yi yR 0. - 29 995 SLOPE ,. x308 SLOPE AREARSALT Y CAFE B L3.ploeT (FNP) _ II x (IN FE5f ) 1 Im6 = 90 R / FRIEMERG REDWW2fi ADE FAA 1ATPAGE30T BEGINNING AT A POST STANDING ABOUT 30 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTERS GREEN AND 50 FEET WEST FROM TIE CENTER OF THE DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAYPROAG TRACK, SAN POST BEING AT THE NORTHWEST CCRNER FN OF PARCEL OF GROUND NEEDED TO SELL OVEN AND RIO ORANGE RAILROAD COMPANY BY THE TALBOT LAND COMPANY: FREESE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL. WEN ME LENSES AND NO GRANDE I.A. 266 FEET TO THE NORTH BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER, THENCE FOLLOWING ME NORTH AND EAST BANK OF HE BOATONG FORK RICER WITH COURSES WEINFELD AND NORTHERLY 760 FEET TO THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTERS CREEK AT ITS JUNCNON IN. ROARING FORK RIVER THENCE N89'44'E 220 FEET TO THE PEACE OF BEGINFLONI TOGETHER WITH ALL WATER RIGHTS PERTAINING PHRENETIC. SULFATE. LYING AND BEING IN SECTION SEVEN p), TOWNSHIP LEN (10) COMM, RANGE EIGHTY-FOUR (64) WEB - OF THE SIXTH PRIRGPAL MERIDIAN. PROPERLY DESCRIPTION DOE suRVEVE01 A PARCEL OF LAND GRATED IN TIE WEST HALF OF BECTON ], TOWNSHIP 10 BOOTH, RANGE 64 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PIMIN, STATE OF COLORADO: SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTCUALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: DOW GERUND AT A POINT UN THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING 30SOUTHERLY OF TEE SOUTH BANK OF COME CREIX, (WHENCE THE WEST CHARTER CORNER OF SAID BECTON J BEARS. SIS E5'40"W A DISTANCE OF 499.25 FEET): THENCE SOB -03.41-E ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD A DISTANCE OF 26069 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER: TEENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY BANK OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER THE FOLLOWED THRTEEN (13) COURSES: $]4'20'45°W A DISTANCE OF THPIC FEET, 2523'49'22"W A DISTANCE OF 61.42 FEET: 3. N,MGAG2YW A DISTANCE OF 61.71 FEET 4 SI2V6'49'W A DISTANCE OF 43.05 FEET, 5. 96tl5'13"W A DISTANCE OF 91.12 FEET, 6. RESOD '32"W A DISTANCE OF 65.31 FEET: J. N60'40'1 FFW A DISTANCE OF 53.12 FEET: S. NAF23'O3"W A CISTANDS OF 7912 FEET; 9. N211Y49"W A DISTANCE OF 35.19 FEET: E0, NOR 43 RATE A DISTANCE OF WEE FEET: I _ PRE1525DE A DISTANCE OF 62,81 LEFT. 2. NJ"112K A O6TANCE OF 64.93 FEET. ES,. NEE 27.14"E A DISTANCE OF 135A3 FEET TO A POINT ON TIE 30UTHERLY BANK OF HUGHES CREEK: THENCE TEAMNG PAID EASIFRLY BANK FBS'45'S SE A DISTANCE OF 235.99 FEET TO MF POINT OF SECJNNNG SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2.755 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. NOTES, 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THUS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF TRUE NORTH DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS TELLING A BEARING OF N89'53'49'E BETWEEN THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, A ELM BRASS CAP IN PLACE AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967 OF THE FILING COUNTY CI£RK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, A REPAIR AND CAP LS. NO 2375 FOUND IN PUCE AS SHOWN HEREON. 2_ DATE OF SURVEY AUGUST 13, 2009. 3. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK all AT PAGE 307, BOOK 512 AT PAGE 253, BIRMORE AT PAGE 951, BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967, BOOK 292 AT PAGE 472, BOOK 568 AT PAGE 75, RECEPTION NO. 59260, PREFORMS NO 501239, RECEPTION NO.. 463751, FINAL PUT OF TRUEMAN NEIGHBOR ROOD COMMERCIAL PROJECT RECORDED IN BOOK 5 AT PAGE 70, DENVER RIO GRANDE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 3 AT PAGE 385 AS RECEPTION NO. 134450 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN. 4, THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS. RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PUCE AND EXCEP70N5 TO PRE SHOWN IN THE TIRE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES. INC.. DATED JULY 27, 2009 (COMMITMENT NUMBER 01 _. ELENA TONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (NASO 29) REFERENCES FROM NATIONAL GROUPIES SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STP.TON 5159 HANNG A PUBUSHEO ELEVATOR OF 7715.64, 6 CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOCI. 7. FLOOD INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF PIMIN COUNTY COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08097CO203 C WUP AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4, 1987. 100 YEAR FLOOD LINE WAS BASED ON DETERMINED ELEVATIONS SHOWN THEREON (DAVIS 1929). 8, THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN 1N PARENTHESES (NOfi'00'W"W) ARE RECORD MEASUREMENTS. 9. THE "HIGH WATERLINE" AND THE "TOP OF SLOPE" SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY GARY BEACH OF BEACH RESOURCES ON FEBRUARY 12, 2010. 10. 2' CONTOURS SHOWN HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM THE PITKIN COUNTY GIS. 11, ZONE AS = 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY, ZONE X = AREA OUTSIDE OF 500 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY. _ 12. THE GAP LABELED M THE NORTHERLY COPPER OF LEE PROPERTY IS A GAP BETWEEN THE SUBJECT \ PROPERTY AND THE DEED FOR THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTHWEST, 13. THE OVERLAP LABELED IN THE NORTHERY CORNER OF THE PROPERTY IS A DEED OVERLAP BY THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTHWEST, 14 DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE ALLOWANCES AND LIMITATIONS OF CITY OF ASPEN PUNNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO SERIES OF 2010, RECORDED AT BOOK PAGE __ AS RECEPTION N0.) qTY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL THIS PLAT OF ME 69 SHADY LANE STEFAN MARGM RENEW AN WAS SEVENTY AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OF 1RE CITY OF ASPEN 1M5 BAY OF O:%I 2011 TEICIA"AAAGON.�CITY"ENGINEER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DWECEOR'A APPROVAL 00Wo 8 O A 00. Szmo V Z 6 0 N N w pbQ {L( F O n 0 Z NOSu lax ZU'4 Z W 7Cm V_ n IT 0 %. g 00 m r Z MM 7N_J@ O 6z U 0 = ED L. THIS PUT OF THE ME- 691 LANE SFREAM MARGIN NEVER PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY ME DIRECTOR OF COMMONLY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE GTT OF ASPEN. THIS ^�__. DAY OF - 201, 3 ❑ O `1 1,Z w ELI i CHfl15 BENOGN, COMMON iYAOEVEL6PMENT DIRECTIXE OWNERS ACKNCNLEDDEMENT - z Z O Y J KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT THE OWNERS IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT PROPERTY SIUATEO IN PITKIN BE 0 COUNTY. COLORADO SHOWN HEREON ACKNOWLEDGE THE ALLOWANCES AND LIMITATIONS OF CITE OF ASPEN R a ci PLANNING AND ZONIN COMMISSION REFFSENCED IN NOTE NO, 14 ON THIS PLAN. U EXECUT NIISL��AYAY BEJA}1,. 20voJ- AS YNW OF Q' BY �UG L..Yf��J\�ff�l�_ _ D_ a BIIINEB yes.... U1 V �!1 / ,� .(u A3C.St..'L NO DT ' . __....__ RECEPTI0N::5EIPF. 06:]0/3910a[ 0 R �. +....%4::2 PYl 1. R IIIDOJani._z K. L OF Lac CSL OI IIPTU, GounTy.GO BY_ WNER PLATE, sG ON�IN PO 4] CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE PROJECT NO, THEE PLAT WAS FILED FOR DEGREE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PIMIN COUNTY AT 2091640.00 q 0CLOCK_'_M., ON THE aCL DAY OF8L'� A,O 2010, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK PRAT PAGE �T� RECEPTION NO. , - By �riFFZ �- I. Y- BY -- -- i 0F1 kURGE AND RECORDER Y DEPUTY RECEPTION#: 572119, 07/22/2010 at 10:15:22 AM, 1 OF 4, R $26.00 '- t !7 " �. `P Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION N0. 13 (SERIES OF 2010) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW STREAM MARGIN REVIEW FOR 69 SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. PARCEL ID: 2735-073-00-012 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the owners of 69 Shady Lane — Jack Rowland, Fleeta Baldwin, Jill Boyd, and Roine St. Andre, owners as tenants in common. The application has been authorized for submission by Jack Rowland, Fleeta Baldwin, and Jill Boyd, representing a majority of the property ownership; and, WHEREAS, the property is located at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Hunter Creek and is subject to the City's regulations on stream margin development; and, WHEREAS, the City's mapping for top -of -slope excludes this property entirely from that area where development can occur and the applicant has submitted an appeal of the determination as permitted in Section 26.435.040 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the property is also affected by the floodplain and the floodway designation as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Map and interpreted and enforced by the City Engineer in her official capacity as the City's Floodplain Administrator; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing continued from May 18, 2010 to and held on June 15, 2010, upon review and consideration of the recommendation of the Community Development Department, presentation from the applicant, public testimony, and discussion and consideration of the proposal, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Stream Margin Special Review, by a six to zero (6-0) vote, with the allowances and limitations as outlined in this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Approval of Stream Margin Review The Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Stream Margin Special Review with the following conditions: 1. A Stream Margin map for this property shall be prepared by the applicant for approval by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. The map shall describe and depict a development boundary based on the more restrictive of the Floodway and the top -of -slope. The map shall also indicate and tabulate all areas of the property above and below the high water line, those areas affected by steep slopes, and those areas affected P&Z Reso No. 13, Series of 2010 Page 1 RECEPTION#: 572119, 07/22/2010 at 10:15:22 AM, 2 OF 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO by right-of-way or access easements, including potential proscriptive easements. This map shall be attached to and recorded along with this Resolution. A 24" x 36" copy of the map shall also be retained in the planning file and the building address file. 2. All development within the development boundary shall be setback at least fifteen (15) feet from the top -of -slope. In addition, any development within the development boundary and within thirty (30) feet of the top -of -slope shall be subject to both a forty- five degree (45°) progressive height limit from the top -of -slope and the height limitations of the zone district. 3. Development between the development boundary and the top -of -slope shall be limited to those types of development allowed within property setbacks as defined in the Land Use Code and the height limitations described above, provided such development is also consistent with floodplain and floodway restrictions. 4. Development on the river -side of this development boundary shall be limited to at -grade type work which will not raise the base flood elevation and which is secured to the ground and cannot enter a flood event. Any development activity including landscaping shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 5. A riparian restoration plan approved by the City of Aspen Parks Department shall be required prior to acceptance of a building permit application for this property. The restoration plan shall require implementation of the restoration prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Remodeling or other similarly limited development activity, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall not trigger this restoration requirement. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit for redevelopment of this property, the well and irrigation pump shall be vacated and all water rights shall be assigned to the City of Aspen. The property shall be connected to the City of Aspen water system. Remodeling or other similarly limited development activity, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall not trigger this well abandonment requirement. Section 2: Lot Area The effective Lot Area of the subject property for purposes of calculating allowable Floor Area (FAR) is as follows: Lot Size: 120,007.8 sf Area below High Water Line (HWL): - 18 751.0 sf Sub -total 101,256.8 sf Shady Lane prescriptive easement: - 288.0 sf Sub -total 100,968.8 sf %z Area above HWL and with 20-30% slope: - 1,247.5s Sub -total 99,721.3 sf P&Z Reso No. 13, Series of 2010 Page 2 RECEPTION#: 572119, 07/22/2010 at 10:15:22 AM, 3 OF 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Area above HWL and with > 30% slope: - 2,035.0 sf TOTAL LOT AREA for calculating FAR: 97,686.3 sf The Lot Area for purposes of determining allowable density (no slope area reductions) is 100,968.8 s.f. The Floor Area for the parcel shall be according to the zoning for the parcel and the Land Use Code in effect at the time of building permit submission. Section 3: Fishing Easement The Planning and Zoning Commission encourages the applicant to provide a Fisherman's Easement along the watercourses within this property. The applicant is encouraged to discuss with the City of Aspen Parks Department ideas that may facilitate such a grant of easement such as labor or design assistance with the riparian restoration plan. Section 4: Vested Rights This approval shall be valid for the greater of the three-year period of statutory vested rights, as more precisely defined in the Development Order issued by the Community Development Department, or until the City's Stream Margin regulations are amended. The period of statutory vested rights may be extended pursuant to Chapter 26.308 of the Land Use Code. Until said time, development on this property in compliance with this resolution may proceed to building permit as allowed herein. After said timeframe, this approval shall be subject to any revised provisions of the Land Use Code and may, based on a determination by the Community Development Director, be subject to review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Section 5• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed P&Z Reso No. 13, Series of 2010 Page 3 RECEPTION#: 572119, 07/22/2010 at 10:15:22 AM, 4 OF 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 15ei day of June, 2010. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jim True, Special Counsel ATTEST: �*� 44-�2 ckie Lothian, Deputy City P&Z Reso No. 13, Series of 2010 Page 4 PLANNING AND ZONING Stan Gibbs, Chairman South side of bridge structure. Log beams, decking, and hand rail. APPENDIX C I e, 0 e->octi6rr / L'Iek� S� A-3 iW Mq,.� ffoio-&f f-jl 1/1 c;;6: - a OUT to OUT BRIDGE LENGTH = 57'-4" N STRINGER LENGTH = 57'-4" (3) SPACES ® 17'-9 5/16" = 53'-4" (DIAPHRAGM FOR OUTSIDE BAYS ONLY) (6) SPACES ® 8'-10 11/16" = 53'-4" (DIAPHRAGM FOR MIDDLE BAY ONLY FOR CONDUIT SUPPORT) PLACE SIGN A DIAPHRAGM THIS AREA ° � W it O 4 N BRIDGE LOG 6„ RAIL POST (e) SPACES ®7'-O 1/2" = 56'-4- 56'-4' WOODEN FENCE RAIL PLAN VIEW 58'-3" %158'-5 1/2" m I GLULAM DETAIL e i (POST NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)IO a m) MEMBERS DESCRIPTION STRINGER W 16x57 .DIAPHRAGM W 6x18 POST BLOCK L 4x3 1/2x5/16 DECK PLANK 2x10 IPE ANCHOR BOLTS 3/4"0 (BY OTHERS) DECK r-6"0 TOP LOG RAIL r4"0 MID LOG RAIL LOG POST PLACE THIS -'r,2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �- _ _ _ _ _t___ - _ 2'-1 1/4" CAMBER STRINGER `o GLULAM tO °O A (INCLUDES 1 1/4" `O iO 1O (BEHIND GLULAM) DEAD LOAD CAMBER i j I (8) SPACES ® 7'-2" = 57'-4' CAMBER DETAIL (3.67% CAMBER) REVI STATUSBY DATE B RE -ISSUED FOR APPROVAL BJ 10/16/2014 I y PROPRIETARYAND CONF/DENT/AL y THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BIG R MANUFACTURING, LLC. AND CONTAINS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FOR USE WITH THISBIGR ^� PROJECT ONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE P.O.BOX 1290•Greele g Colorado 80632-1290 rWITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS STRICILYPROHIBITED. B R I D G E (970) 356-9600 • FaX:1970) 356-9621 • www.bigrbridg 57F-40 ( 9s 0 /L 67—®R MUSTANG HOLDINGS 9 ASPEN, CO BRIKOR ASSOCIATES TYPICAL WOODEN PLANKS �:I:iC�d�LYilLll LI2 -11 NOTE: 1.) RECESS ALL EXPOSED FASTENERS 1/2' TO INSTALL WOOD PLUG. 2.) CUT WOOD PLANKS AROUND LOG POSTS. 3.) PLANKS WILL BE SHIPPED LOOSE AS NEEDED TO AID IN LIFTING AND INSTALLING BRIDGE LOOSE PLANKS TO BE COORDINATED WITH CONTRACTOR. 6'0 TOP WOODEN LOG RAIL NOTCHED INTO LOG POST LOG POST O n 4"0 MID LOG RAIL DUT to OUT BRIDGE LENGTH --,n STRINGER LENGTH �`-- r (2) 1/4"0 GALV. CARRIAGE POLTS _9" RS–TYP. 1/2"0 x 3 1/2" CARRIAGE BOLT STONE THRESHOLD K /4"0 x 2 1/2" CARRIAGE BOLT WITH WASHER, NUT & WOOD PLUG BY OTHERS WITH WASHER, NUT & WOOD PLUG (FOR GLULAM ATTACHMENT) WOOD DECK 1" OVER–HANG TYP. 1/2"0 x 7 1/2" CARRIAGE BOLT SYRINGE WITH WASHER, NUT & WOOD PLUG f° 2' `a (FOR LOG POST ATTACHMENT} ro 1 3/80 HOLEDIAPHRI 4" 1" GAP 13/16" m 3 SIDES TYP• SEAL , IITYP I ABUTMENTLATESTONE VENEER % IC PAD (BY OTHERS) GLULAM 1/4 TYP.U–BOLT 3"0 CONDUIT STRINGER DIAPHRAGM OE to CE ANCHOR BOLT —,�- 2x16 TYP BEARING DETAIL POST BLOCK 1'-9" 1'-9"1 11_9". 1/4 TYR (LOG POST & RAIL NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) SECTION a NOTE: BOTTOM NUT FINGER TIGHT, TOP NUT TIGHT AT s EXPANSION END. BOTH NUTS TIGHT AT FIXED END. �9 11/16" 1'-4 5/8" 2'-1 3/8" 1'-4 5/8" 9 11/16" m R • • I HOLES WITH RECESS DECK PLANK DETAIL (75) REQUIRED STATUS JBYJ DATE RE—ISSUED FOR APPROVAL I BJ 10/16/2014 'RIETARYAND CONFIDENT/AL RAINING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF BIG R MANUFACTURING, LLC. ONTAINS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FOR USE WITH THISBIGR P,O. BOX 1290•Greele Colorado 80632-1290 'CTONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PARTOR ASA WHOLE y, UT WRITTEN PERMISSION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. B R I D G E (970) 356-9600 • Far1970) 356-9621 • www.bigrbrldg 571-4v A 61—®A MUSTANG HOLDINGS 11 ASPEN, CO BRIKOR ASSOCIATES NOTE 6" POST BLOCKS LOCATED AT BRIDGE ENDS, CL POSTS AND MID -POINT BETWEEN POSTS. 1'-0" POST BLOCKS LOCATED AT BRIDGE MID -SPAN. f o AEG�r u°��� ✓per CHECKED BY MJP SHEEP NO, 102 OF 102 L�?rI4176eT 2 I1 - I I — — I I F / Ev�mxL I I NICE, cwrvBR ]- I (Ancry II . Eul NARRI LAP (CI ryEx I low Wunwr waN¢wxL) , \ / GO XJ£ E/LOP]PLAIN .. y�REAMI ,y maxRrr uxE �� EamnL waEHUNTER WATER CREEK ( / �. Bof / WIX9 ®II I ARAN Y / BERIBERI ® EN y IZR �, wanEERmc) I V E a® PWNW a%RIE Pft2GEED IRC STAIX .�i 1 _____ __ J m .v'- t '�RISLRFACE WALLAA ICH ARWIIECPE Py' OE�AI15 LR AND SME / \ CB F0i 51 % .4E �825'Y / / \ - FLOOD E NCE PSDWI+.vn Po' ADv VSIS 1 ,a 22 a0 1 Al". RI]..`0• S9 S J� \ 11.2Y vl AN 0 DEvmamr ° wAul RI6W \ GENERAL SITE NOTES o m / / RIS.SS jS' 1 1 `\, �' nIE cp bcpRPEPPxcrylEOl's plgNs, pPrvEWPYPEPIEp SE OTONPEAPPCMRCTEPUNr. o � `�- wn Rif SS ' jz FucsoXE , RETANNcu EYm�Rs. DCmRAND ATYSETO MATCH CATHrecrE "") IMINGSTONE as"YA - • - E V s HN6TROCT PeEl�opaoPwieo Pw,ixE p m 1 flISPo 1.4£ FIiAL � 1 PRNS3D WALL RISSO \ \ /\\!/ O MrvnreurnoNnovnen is TaE'es`EI�i.LL pmIW651m — } AW �flB ro EE VSm \/� (3£ST 91r C9J 1 GS• ��� I6 S R�SSS' 9 \ RISSS 0 RY6CS 1>S2' I / NVM6fli :'"Pp — — REVISION NOTES:4 Q REPS TIPTHAVE BEEN REvs®ARE AS EOI I S OS ��� zrno]3oWlz \\ IR.S F n ARE _ \ XE ANO PItE]IIF IPw — I DTNRPREE p 2 j Oi I I FIREEMEANTS uNHHP VEwAY 1 %tNSSES HAFOSCAPE A{LLCMIECITS PUN \ T ® I --- �FROINPoVSFD CONNECTION BE Oi N6P F p \ SEE IPNSECPPE AFCiI. PIAN FQR SETAIL] PERNWE 1 LWS16 / _ _ II ¢ 6 \ \ \ RIS. pqA PQIR � _ _ LANO EPIAN II S.4➢ASS PPNERS YECH RP.25' \ CB FRTRp11L5 \ �. I a Q� \ FLOOD PLAIN NOTE: \ \ I NE mEENPREPARE PeE Psion sDu v~Eaoo�o rv"`EDAmnnHH wAsl"I OBARGEWOWTHAN wsE DE wEa, lss]. pprEaR EJppp urvewns pAsepory \ mrvc mrE -\ 'N`' ♦� ® los.se' �1 II NO mEpwLpiNc sresnRE vesic�TEDD`iNCONEx`D lsas)'PERTHE EEMAR.pepirvsvPnNSEMAP GRAPHIC SCALE \ AVWST AGG S / In \ \ // \ \ KGETA PLN HLE fiSWMIN/ oEeElovawr AREA W CO pOH is' ros sEIRAw Z Q0 1 NO, = zD x. Z o ,J 0 F 100 W l r z Z d Tn O VJ I C Q \ O I WJW STD4E (fl \ / /II I \ %tSFERlY LINE A / / / \ — \ CALL BEFORE YOU DIG I GE X H DX 800-922_ 00. 922_1987 DW„I�,3 o I I ®aDA,E ® I - AR G% ARM. BC TSMATE EmHS N.A. unun¢ NE JOBNO. 11AA7 SHEET TO I LEGEND: PROPOSED DEOIDUOUSTREES - PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREES f4';r EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN L PROPOSED SHRUBS m° HUNTER CREEK DID RETENTION AREA SEE CIVIL DWGS pROPERTYNE_ / V,'1�H /J, PVP -16, RG4 \ _ 1 r LT'I4 T SAT5J-6 PVP 1$ - PROPOSED NEW J �,._1 NLT 5 RGE HOT TUB SEE / / '" SR -6 ARCH DWG6 17 / DOG 1 "/1x 7 NLTE SAJE OR ��I 1. i o RUN H D; - LY -11(F15) ECS DRAINAGE1 SWALE 4 HR -12 Q/ SEE CIVIL DWGS /-",u - �� / '� �F "' SAE SR-12Vu LG -16' LM / I I zw='" PS 10 810 RETENTION ARFF�,, E r /;�I x �� (F-15) PS AG] = SEE CIVIL DWGS. ,.} �µ �w * x \ I FF `.0 DHRS'28 1 eexx AAC-7- / 1 ` _ _ _( HG -25 / Fc. ACE -7 / 11 RE-VEGETATEALL PHR2015 LG -12 IJMITS OF DISTURBANCE SEE rt!✓ 1 CMLGRADING PLAN �'� B V / NEW Py�rr',, 1 1 A 1 RESIDENCE - L- > -+q I _y LM 7(F15) PS 10 3 ACE 10 SA_ STF6 EDGER P.r- C r i� s .� IE .n AGACE 0 ' ,V 1�� 16� cca Paas f)Ip\\� I .t,`p �HS-7 X c VD1 \ V pt 1 1' lib a1 11 i iY^,L.730.5 S EG6 " 13 a ) THE 22 L - 4F}s 2>�) 1 OFSgCkF 4tN, 5N_7 o r EDGER a - x c , - I", FIRE PITTURF / (� tkx1 TE \S,E SEE ARCH SN 14 - ° PON -a LAWx�v \ V �I y10`p�TggO DWGS�� LA -10 r EOGEft Laz'- „— STF4 F kF C5 HS -115 -_ NATIVE REVEGETATION MIX- ECT \ RG -10 V ,A V ll'�-,✓ ___ SAJE NOTE FINAL PLACEMENT OF \ DRAINAGE SWALE, PROPOSED RIPARIAN SHRUBSTOBE \ } SEE CIVIL DW3S. DETERMINED IN TH E FIELDBASED FENCE -42" MAX. HEIGHT ON LOCATION OF EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN T A, A \ APPROXIMATELIMITS., DpF� V OF RIPARIAN \ v RESTORATION V ° AT -2 CS -2 RC -3 SG -3 C ryIGry ROgR/NOFO VA T RE IINE� RON C53 R RW RG PERENNIALS ISLAND V SB C` TURF (SOD) \ LJ RIPARIAN SEED MIX NATIVE REVEGETATION MIX- �J� PITKIN COUNTY SEED MIX APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF RIPARIAN RESTORATION �REVEGETATE o CONSTRUCTION DISTURBANCE y REVEGETATION AREA ®d NEWTHREE RAIL LOG FENCE -42" MAX. HEIGHT L .b DerEtaPr"€rvrAREAi , � i'CZ I F / ♦ ' O� � L _ X '� REVEGETATE 1800 / / 1 /, , SF CONSTRUCTION) U- T. DISTURBANCE )w� AREA; SEE CIVIL k"' , rz!`v�V �K' DWGS. 1�A' I ti�� xPD-,.^` vl li 1. i�.I'i'C FUTURE NEW \` BRIDGE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT 36' FRONT YARD SETBACK PPU-1(15) PPLLi (12) SA3 CSB -3 PPU-1 (16) PON -3 PPU-1 (16') \ SA -65 m PT -2 PT -1 (CLUMP) Y1 PPU-1 (18) x LG -18 PS -8 NEW GATE, SEE ARCH. S,S PS -8 G-17 RED -1(16') PT-1(OLimp) PPU I (12') SA -10 P/-1 PPU-1 (12') DGER 32 PGI PT -1 (CLUMP) — PT -1 —PPU-1 (16) CSAE Vi T} 1 (CLUMP) CSA CSA -0 PT -I (CLUMP) -4 IT VU PAN -2 Ip T 11-A T/A � C � 1 aaI H f7� SCALE: 1/ifi'=1'-P' E'kttI X5+7' 3 mwl 911 M.h Sheet SoD, 102 Carbo d.I.00.8ICn 1 970,961E520 tenmlum C/23/20159135 MUSTANG HOLDINGS II 69 SHADY LANE ASPEN,CO ve'p w LANDSCAPE PLAN/ TREE MITIGATION L-3.0 500 �REVEGETATE o / SF CONSTRUCTION \ / y DISTURBANCE \ ®d AREA, SEE CIVIL / DWGS. 36' FRONT YARD SETBACK PPU-1(15) PPLLi (12) SA3 CSB -3 PPU-1 (16) PON -3 PPU-1 (16') \ SA -65 m PT -2 PT -1 (CLUMP) Y1 PPU-1 (18) x LG -18 PS -8 NEW GATE, SEE ARCH. S,S PS -8 G-17 RED -1(16') PT-1(OLimp) PPU I (12') SA -10 P/-1 PPU-1 (12') DGER 32 PGI PT -1 (CLUMP) — PT -1 —PPU-1 (16) CSAE Vi T} 1 (CLUMP) CSA CSA -0 PT -I (CLUMP) -4 IT VU PAN -2 Ip T 11-A T/A � C � 1 aaI H f7� SCALE: 1/ifi'=1'-P' E'kttI X5+7' 3 mwl 911 M.h Sheet SoD, 102 Carbo d.I.00.8ICn 1 970,961E520 tenmlum C/23/20159135 MUSTANG HOLDINGS II 69 SHADY LANE ASPEN,CO ve'p w LANDSCAPE PLAN/ TREE MITIGATION L-3.0 /p17C7:101191Ptlt 1Ufc/517- / A. Purpose of Report This report has been prepared for a proposed pedestrian bridge that will replace an existing pedestrian bridge that spans a portion of the Roaring Fork River at the Mustang project site. The project is located at 69 Shady Lane in Aspen, Colorado. The purpose of this report is as follows: • Review and outline the impacts that the existing and proposed pedestrian bridge structures have on the 100 year FEMA floodplain of the Roaring Fork River at the project site. • Document that the proposed bridge is in compliance with Appendix D of the City of Aspen's Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP), which is the "No-Rise/No-Impact" Certification for proposed development in regulatory floodways. B. General Overview The Mustang project (site) is located at 69 Shady Lane within the City of Aspen, Colorado. Figure lattached to this report is a general vicinity map of the project area. The total parcel area is approximately 2.755 acres. Portions of the site are currently under construction, including the main house, an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), and utility work which are covered under separate permit. The property is bound on the west and south by the Roaring Fork River, on the east by Shady Lane, and on the north by Hunter Creek. As the Roaring Fork River enters the property, the river splits into two channels to create an island on the south side of the property. A pedestrian bridge exists on the site that crosses the channel of the Roaring Fork River to access the island on the south side of the property. It is proposed to remove the current bridge and replace it with a new pedestrian bridge. The bridge has been structurally designed by Big R Bridge. The new bridge will improve the existing condition because it will raise the span of the bridge entirely out of the floodplain, and the concrete abutments have been designed to withstand scouring and all floodplain impacts. C. FEMA Floodplain The existing project site falls within the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 08097CO203 C, Effective Date: June 4, 1987. See Figure 2 attached displaying a FIRMETTE created from FEMA's online Map Service Center showinging the 100 -year inundation area. The existing pedestrian bridge on the site falls approximately 10 - 15 feet downstream of the FEMA delineated cross sectionDW. The cross sectional data for FEMA section DW is included in Table 1 below. Table 1. FEMA Floodway Data for Cross Section DW Q (cfs) Width (ft) Section Area (sf) Velocity (fps) BFE 3,300 240 577 5.7 7831.0 Section DW data is part of Flood Insurance Study Number 08097CV001A for Pitkin County, Colorado revised October 19, 2004. In the Authority of Acknowledgements section, it states that the study was completed in April of 1985. Because the data from the study is 29 years old, a survey was performed by Sopris Engineering in May of 2014 to more accurately analyze the subject site. D. Existing Pedestrian Bridge Description The existing pedestrian bridge on the property is not mentioned or modeled in the FEMA flood study. For this flood section analysis, the existing bridge is not included, and the flood comparison is compared to the historic (pre -bridge) condition. The existing bridge will be removed prior to construction of the proposed bridge, and is discussed below. The existing bridge consists of a compilation of timber materials. There are two log beams approximately 8 inches in diameter and approximately 38 feet long each spanning from the south bank of the river to a concrete column with a steel cross beam located near the north bank of the river. From the column, the structure changes from the log beams to 2"x8" timber material acting as beams and spanning another approximately 16 feet to the north end of the bridge.The decking of the existing bridge is made up of 2"x4", 2"x6", and 2"x8" timber laying laterally across the beams. There is a split rail handrail on the east side of the bridge constructed of 2"x4" timber material. There are no abutments at the ends of the bridge, instead the longitudinal beams lay directly on the banks of the river. The concrete column near the north end of the bridge is approximately 1.5 feet in diameter and has a concrete pad footing on the bank of the north end of the river.The pictures below display the conditions of the existing pedestrian bridge. Attached Figure 3 shows a profile view of the existing bridge. Existinf ank. South side of bridge structure. Log beams, decking, and hand rail. E. Proposed Pedestrian Bridge Description The proposed bridge has been structurally designed by Big R Bridge. The new bridge will be constructed at the same location as the existing bridge. The span of the bridge includes (4) steel I -Beams that are approximately 1.5 feet tall, have a 2 foot vertical camber, and free span approximately 57.5 feet. For reference, the width of river as surveyed on May 13, 2014 is 30 feet directly under the bridge. The proposed structure will have decking attached to the beams and will contain a hand rail on both sides of the bridge. The steel beams will be set onto concrete abutments on both sides of the river. Each abutment is a 2.3 feet long and 10 feet wide above grade. Below grade, the footer of the abutment extends an additional 1 foot towards the river. The abutment footer on the river side will be exposed concrete under the bridge. The abutments have been designed by Big R Bridge to withstand the 100 year flood. Attached Figure 4 shows a profile view of the proposed bridge. F. Bridge Hydraulic Methods and Assumptions The historic existing (pre -bridge) and proposed river cross sections at the bridge locationwere analyzed using continuity of flow Manning's equation for open channel flow: Q=VA= A(1.486/n)(112")(S1/2) Where: A = area in square feet V = velocity in feet per second n = Manning's roughness coefficient R = wetted perimeter S = channel flow line slope The Manning's user defined cross section was created based on the surveyed river data from May 2014, and was analyzed in Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD Civil 3D. Various Manning's roughness coefficientswere assumed per Table 2 below. Table 2. Manning's Roughness Coefficients Surface Material Manning's'n' Concrete - wooden forms 0.015 Floodplains - light brush 0.05 Floodplains - heavy brush 0.075 Floodplains - trees 0.15 Natural streams - clean and straight 0.03 The flow velocity of the existing FEMA cross section DW was considered when applying the "n" coefficients to the section. It was conservatively assumed that the forest vegetation had matured since the FEMA flood study. Therefore, a slightly higher overall "n" coefficient was assumed which means that the river velocity was slightly slower. Using the same 100 year Q of 3,300 cfs and the continuity of flow equation Q=VA, if the velocity decreases, the cross sectional area increases which provides for a conservative base flood elevation (BFE) assumption. The slope of the channel was averaged over both main channels of the river. For the floodplain, the total increased blocked area for the proposed bridge is 2.24 square feet for the concrete abutments and steps. The calculation is described in Section H below. The entire bridge span is above the calculated BFE. Given the very small study area, a HEC -RAS analysis would be difficult to model and would have a small impact considering the overall cross section's blocked conveyance area. The HEC -RAS model would not return meaningful results. The onsite improvements are in compliance with the established FEMA BFEs. It is our professional opinion that a HEC -RAS model would be consistent with this analysis, and is not warranted given the results of these bridge calculations. G. Existing River Section Analysis The existing surveyed river cross sectional data was input into the Hydraflow program. Manning's "n" factors were assigned per Table 2 above based on the existing condition. The river channels were clean and straight. The island vegetation had some trees and brush, and the river's edge generally had grasses and low plantings. Table 3 below summarizes the existing river section data. The existing channel report from Hydraflow is included in the report Appendix. Table 3. Existing river cross section at the Bridge location Q (cfs) Width (ft) Section Area (sf) Velocity (fps)BFE T7830 3,300 240.58 624.85 5.28 .20 With the higher "n" factor assumption, the flood section has a lower velocity and an increased section area. The section width however matches the 1987 FEMA section, and the BFE is 0.80 foot lower than the 1987 FEMA flood elevation. The higher "n" factor is an appropriate as well as conservative assumption that considers the existing vegetation onsite. If the "n" factor was lowered to match the FEMA section velocity and area, the BFE would be even lower than the 7830.20 from the existing calculation. H. Proposed Pedestrian Bridge River Section Analysis The existing surveyed river cross sectional data was copied and was updated to reflect the proposed bridge abutment condition. The Manning's "n" factor was revised to 0.015 for the steps up to the bridge deck and the concrete abutments, but the section otherwise remained unchanged. Table 4 below summarizes the proposed river section data. The developed channel report from Hydraflow is included in the report Appendix. Table 4. Proposed Bridge river cross section Q (cfs) Width (ft) Section Area (sf) Velocity (fps)BFE 3,300 230.25 614.81 5.37 7830.15 The proposed bridge section lowers the BFE by an additional 0.05 foot. The width of the flood channel decreased because the top of the concrete abutments are above the BFE, and because the proposed BFE is lower than the existing calculated BFE. The lower proposed BFE is a result of the slight velocity increase (and corresponding reduction in the section area) from the concrete abutment's lower "n" factor when compared to the existing bank vegetation. For the proposed bridge section, the very small increase in blocked area is more than offset by the lower "n" factor. Also note that the slight increase in velocity is still less than the FEMA section velocity. As mentioned in section F above, the total increased blocked area for the proposed bridge is 2.24 square feet for the concrete abutments and steps. When compared to the total blocked area, this area is 0.37% of the total section area. This very small blocked area improves the hydraulic flow capacity in this immediate area. The proposed BFE reduction will occur directly adjacent to the bridge section. I. No -Rise/ No -Impact Certification Appendix D of the City of Aspen's URMP includes a guidance document for local floodplain management. The criteria is adopted by local ordinance and includes the following language from Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 60.3(d)(3): "A community shall prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other development within the adopted regulatory floodway unless it has been demonstrated through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in accordance with standard engineering practice that the proposed encroachment would not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge." The proposed bridge is in compliance with the City of Aspen's No -Rise / No -Impact Certification. The historic existing calculation (no existing bridge) lowers the BFE by 0.80 foot at the bridge location. The proposed bridge calculation lowers the BFE by an additional 0.05 foot. Also, the concrete abutment area is a very small blocked area and does not constitute substantial improvements. The proposed bridge is an improvement over the existing bridge, especially considering the flood debris hazard of the existing bridge structure J. Wetlands Impacts Refer to the separate wetlands report prepared by Beach Environmental. The delineated wetlands will not be disturbed with the bridge replacement. Because there is no impact, an Army Corp permit is not necessary for replacement of the existing structure. Keeping the existing concrete pier in place ensures no impact to the river. Beach Environmental indicated that a notice letter will be submitted to the Army Corp that notifies of the construction. K. Summary/ Conclusions In summary and conclusion, the updated survey and hydraulic calculations indicate the proposed bridge is in compliance with the City of Aspen's "No-Rise/No-Impact" Certification. The following points summarize the hydraulic calculations: • The existing base flood elevation at this location is 0.80 foot lower than the FEMA BFE. • The proposed bridge has a very small increase in blocked area, but lowers the BFE by an additional 0.05 foot from the existing calculation. • Big R Bridge has designed the concrete abutments to withstand the flood impacts. The proposed bridge span is entirely out of the floodplain. This is a significant improvement over the existing bridge, which had a significant portion of the bridge span in the floodplain. • Wetlands will not be impacted. An Army Corp permit is not necessary. • The hydraulic analysis confirms our expectation. The flood velocity increases slightly, while the cross sectional area decreases slightly. The existing (no bridge) conditions upstream & downstream of the bridge section will remain unaffected by the abutment. L. Engineer's Statement of Design Compliance I hereby affirm that this report and the accompanying plans for the site drainage mitigation of the Mustang Project was prepared under my direct supervision for the owners thereof in accordance with the provisions of City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan and approved variances and exceptions listed thereto. 1 understand that it is the policy of the City of Aspen that the City of Aspen does not and will not assume liability for drainage facilities by others. Yancy Nichol License No. 28377 Licensed Professional Engineer, State of Colorado N------------- ROARING,FORK RIVER I I �tXISTING CONCRETE AD FOOT1Rf3�-0 REMAIN I TO ROTECT WEFLAND/ RIPARIAN A 9, I� � EXISTING BRI ` 1 -ALIGNMENT ISLAND WETLANDS o BOUNDARY XISTINGOJI`,LDERS� EXLSTING-C�OLUMN TO BE REMOVED - 'x ` _ E REMOVED i WETLANDS LEGEND alp I �` - - I \_ ry w o w D 4 MAIN LAND WETLANDS k—BOUNDARY i ItlXPGmE'�fl DRAWING SCALE: 1" = 10' v J J M Z � W z LU Lu ¢ w p o Zofpoo U Lu Z z z" LJJzO6 N Usn rn . . -> om U Q w 0 U 0- 0— V) V) W Q z 0 DD Lu N H m x X W cl w 0 EXISTING BRIDGE, EXISTING STEELCOLUMN WETLANDS EXTENT WETLANDS EXTENT APPROXIMATE LOCATION TO BE REMOVED LLI C7 54.40' SHALLOW FLOW m J EX 100 -YR FLOOD SECTION DEPTH < 0.70'± O 0 100 YEAR FLOW DEPTH <1' ±ON ISLAND (WITHOUT EX BRIDGE) ELEV=7830.20 Q ry OJ 06 7830— ISLAND — — — — — _ TO HOUSE _ — 7830 O Q ., —LLJ W c 0- C9 i ¢ C, EXISTING CO CRETE PAD FOOTING TO REMAIN z It m TO PROTECTWETLAND/ RIP/ RAN AREA 7820 Q O J H r (.`J Z 7820 '^ ? EX. RIVER SECTION - m a' '^ U 0 u) N m ry EX. WATER LEVEL= 7825.05± ry ry M (05/13/2014 SURVEY) N ry N ai Q X o� m ca (05/13/2014 SURVEY) w w ca w W n n = U) C-0 0+00 ISLAND SIDE0+50 0+94 BRIDGE CL PROFILE DATE: 09-19-14 DRAWING SCALE: HORIZONTAL AND JOB NO. 11057 VERTICAL: 1" = 10' FIGURE 3 N H m x X W cl w 0 I i J 6Ta / WETLANDS ISLAND BOUNDARY m 0 ONCRETE ABUTMENT AND STEPS 0 0 — WETLANDS LEGEND e WETLANDS FLAG/DESIGNATION # a WETLANDS SOIL BORE/DESIGNATION # WETLANDS/FLAGGED BOUNDARY WETLANDS/RIVER AREA EX. WETLANDS DE 100 -YR FLOOD SECTION ELEV = 7830.15 100 YEAR FLOW DEPTH <1'±ON ISLANDS ISLAND ve-r-fall 7820 III IPIIGI illwiloI7 CONCRETE ABUTMENT AND STEPS WETLANDS BOUNDARY FEMA +-7831 U J J M Lu z Lu Lu W o o Z w0o4 l'7 vii �n uj v ; Z Z Z J o w m n Z o rn j o m N U M Q d U W Q �\ \ > DRAWING SCALE: 1" = 10' PROPOSED BRIDGE SECTION AND DECKING. REFER TO BIG R BRIDGE PLANS. TOP OF BRIDGE DECK rELEV = 7833.78 WETLANDS EXTENT TOP OF DECK= / PROPOSED STEPS (2) AT 11H:SV TO HOUSE — — — 7830 0+00 DRAWING SCALE: HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL: 1" = 10' 0+50 BRIDGE CL PROFILE 0+94 _SHALLOW FLOW DEPTH < 0.70'± BOTTOM ABUTMENT ELEV = 7823.88 7820 W c� 54'- 6" W J ILL PROPOSED STEPS (2) Z 0 0 o J O W U ABUTMENT FACE TO O] = w 7 d U) W 2 UL Q 0 J U a Q m LU U) O 0� AT 11Ho8V = a E-17 ABUTMENT FACE rn co 52' -.6" BELOW GRADE m m EX. WATER LEVEL=7825.05± (05/13/2014 SURVEY) w n � n 0+00 DRAWING SCALE: HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL: 1" = 10' 0+50 BRIDGE CL PROFILE 0+94 _SHALLOW FLOW DEPTH < 0.70'± BOTTOM ABUTMENT ELEV = 7823.88 7820 W c� 0 W J ILL Z 0 0 o J O W U a z O] = w d U) W 2 UL Q 0 J U a Q m LU U) O 0� U o O J = a rn co DATE: 09-19-14 JOB NO. 11057 FIGURE 4 CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL 2.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 2.1 BACKGROUND 2.2 LOCATION 2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.4 DISTURBANCE AREA 3.0 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION 3.1 PERMITS/OTHER DOCUMENTS 3.2 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION 3.3 PROJECT SIGN 3.4 CONTACT DESIGNATION 4.0 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 DATES OF CONSTRUCTION 4.2 HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION 4.3 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION 4.4 ADJOINING PROPERTIES 4.5 PROJECT FENCING 4.6 PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE 5.0 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN 5.1 PARKING MANAGEMENT FORM 5.2 EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND PARKING 5.3 CONSTRUCTION PARKING DETAILS 5.4 STAGING & MATERIAL STORAGE AREAS 6.0 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 6.1 GENERAL 6.2 HAUL ROUTES 6.3 ONSITE VEHICLE LIMITATIONS 6.4 DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS 6.5 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 7.0 PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION 7.1 GENERAL 8.0 SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL 8.1 PRE -CONSTRUCTION BMPS 8.2 POST CONSTRUCTION BMPS 9.0 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL 9.1 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN 9.2 REQUIREMENTS 10.0 EMISSIONS 10.1 GENERAL 10.2 EMISSIONS FROM DIESEL POWERED ENGINES 11.0 NOISE SUPPRESSION 11.1 GENERAL 11.2 NOISE SUPPRESSION PLAN 11.3 REQUIREMENTS 11.4 SPECIFIC RESTRICTIONS RELATED TO MANUFACTURING ON SITE Appendices Appendix A Construction Management Plan Appendix B Permits & Documentations Appendix C Required Construction Sign Appendix D Contact List fi�rZ�]��Iq:L•1� This document outlines a Construction Management Plan (CMP) for the construction associated with the 69 Shady Lane pedestrian bridge. The proposed bridge will replace an existing bridge crosses over a split portion of the Roaring Fork River to an island that is on the 69 Shady Lane property. Where applicable, sections of this report match the sections found in the City of Aspen's Construction Management Plan Requirements Manual. For reference, an illustrational Construction Management Plan (CMP) has been provided and can be found in Appendix A of this document. The two concrete abutments for the bridge have a combined area of 90 SF. During construction, there will be a total of 2,200 SF of grass area disturbance. All disturbed grass will be revegetated to the existing condition. 2.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION 2.1 BACKGROUND: The 69 Shady Lane project is currently under construction. Permitted improvements include a new single family home, an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), site landscaping, and utility work. The property is bound on the west and south by the Roaring Fork River, on the east by Shady Lane, and on the north by Hunter Creek. As the Roaring Fork River enters the property, the river splits into two channels to create an island on the south side of the property. A pedestrian bridge exists on the site that crosses the channel of the Roaring Fork River to access the island on the south side of the property. It is proposed to remove the current bridge and replace it with a new pedestrian bridge. The bridge has been structurally designed by Big R Bridge. The new bridge will improve the existing condition because it will raise the span of the bridge entirely out of the floodplain, and the concrete abutments have been designed to withstand scouring and all floodplain impacts. 2.2 LOCATION: The Mustang project (site) is located at 69 Shady Lane within the City of Aspen, Colorado. Please refer to Figure 1 -Vicinity Map below. 2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will involve removal of an existing wooden pedestrian bridge, and construction of new free span pedestrian bridge that will sit on concrete abutments. The total length of the bridge is just less than 60 L.F and has a clear span of 54.5'. The bridge crosses over a river section that is approximately 30' wide. Bridge structural plans and a bridge flood study included as a part of the landscape permit and this CMP contain the bridge details for review. 2.4 DISTURBANCE AREA: The two concrete abutments for the bridge have a combined area of 90 SF. During construction, there will be a total of 2,200 SF of grass area disturbance. All disturbed grass will be revegetated to the existing condition. 3.0 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION 3.1 PERMITS/OTHER DOCUMENTS: A landscape / grading permit for the bridge construction is being submitted in conjunction with this CMP. For the bridge work, there is a very limited amount of disturbance. For dust control and for the Stormwater Management Plan permits, the bridge will be considered a part of the overall site improvements. The total site disturbance is less than 1.0 acre, so a Stormwater Management Plan permit is not required. The site contractor Brikor has a current contractor's license to perform work in the COA. 3.2 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION: Improvements are contained on private property. Public notification is not necessary. 3.3 PROJECT SIGN: A project sign will be provided at the entrance to the site. This sign will include the name of the project, permit number, contractor's contact information and a 24-hour emergency contact number. A sample of the construction sign is located within Appendix C of this document. 3.4 CONTACT DESIGNATION: A list of all applicable contacts has been provided within Appendix D of this document. 4.0 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 DATES OF CONSTRUCTION: A construction start is contingent on permit issuance with the City of Aspen. At this point the tentative schedule is a start in early spring with a completion approximately 45 days after that. No construction will take place on Sundays, Memorial Day, July 4th, and Labor Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Years, or any other prohibited work days. 4.2 HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION: Monday - Friday: 7:30 A.M. — 5:30 P.M. & Saturday: 9:00 A.M. — 5:00 P.M. Work hours will match the current allowed hours of the rest of the site construction. 4.3 SEQUENCING OF CONSTRUCTION: The anticipated construction sequence shall be as follows. ➢ Mobilization onto the site for removal of the existing bridge and concrete abutment excavation and construction. ➢ Survey control set up. Wetlands extent staked on main land and on island to ensure no disturbance. ➢ Erosion control installed. ➢ Crane set up on the mainland adjacent to north bridge abutment. ➢ Materials hand delivered on existing bridge or craned to the island. A mini excavator will be craned to the island. ➢ Existing pedestrian bridge removed by crane. Existing steel column on main land will be cut off. Existing rounded concrete footer on edge of river will remain in place. ➢ Workers will access the island by wading across the river, or a temporary bridge will be constructed from the existing concrete to the island for worker access to the island. ➢ Temporary demobilization of the crane. ➢ Excavation for concrete abutments. ➢ Abutment forming and concrete pour. A pump truck will be used to pour the concrete. ➢ Strip concrete forms and backfill/ grade. ➢ Re -mobilization of the crane ➢ Removal of concrete forms. Removal of construction equipment and excavated soil for abutments. ➢ Delivery of the pre -assembled Big R steel bridge. ➢ Crane set of the steel bridge on the concrete abutments. ➢ Construction of bridge steps. ➢ Hydroseeding of disturbed areas. Temporary irrigation installed. ➢ Demobilization. 4.4 ADJOINING PROPERTIES: Excavation and improvements are proposed entirely on 69 Shady Lane property. No adjoining properties will be disturbed or affected. 4.5 PROJECT FENCING: Project fencing exists for the site construction. Project fencing will be added around the proposed bridge abutments. The fencing will be restored to the current location after bridge construction and revegetation. 4.6 PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE: All construction activity will uphold utmost respect to public health and welfare. This is reflected on the Construction Management Plan which is provided within Appendix A of this report. 4.7 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: The bridge construction is adjacent to the river and sensitive natural areas. Prior to construction the contractor will stake the wetlands, install the project fencing, and install erosion control. The limits of disturbance will be the minimum area needed for crane setup and for excavation. Refer to the attached CMP for illustrational support. 5.0 PARKING MANAGEMENT 5.1 PARKING MANAGEMENT FORM: Parking for the bridge will be in the existing parking areas onsite. 5.2 EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND PARKING: Emergency vehicles will have access to the site from Shady Lane. Emergency vehicle parking will be provided onsite. 5.3 CONSTRUCTION PARKING DETAILS: All construction parking will be provided in the existing parking areas onsite. Testing engineers and construction observation parking will also utilize the construction parking onsite. 5.4 STAGING AREAS: The Construction Management Plan located within Appendix A illustrates the proposed location for staging and stockpiling material. All material excavation stockpiles will occur adjacent to the abutments. The abutment is 10' wide by 6.75' deep, and the bottom of the abutment is 4-4.5 below existing grade. The assumed excavation is 16'x10' by 4'. The excavated material is estimated to be 24 CY per abutment. Material needed for abutment backfill will be stockpiled onsite. Material will be hauled off after backfill is complete. 5.5 CONSTRUCTION TRAILER, MATERIALS STORAGE, AND WASTE MANAGEMENT: The existing site construction layout will remain unchanged. 6.0 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 6.1 GENERAL: No street closures are anticipated for this project. Construction signage and/or fencing will delineate the construction parking and staging area. A traffic control plan will not be needed for the bridge scope. 6.2 HAUL ROUTES: Haul routes offsite will be Shady Lane to Red Mountain Road to State Highway 82. 6.3 ONSITE VEHICLE LIMITATIONS: Gross vehicle weights shall be: 36,000 lbs GVW for two axle vehicles, 54,000 lbs GVW for three or more axle/single unit vehicles and 85,000 lbs GVW for non -interstate haulers. 6.4 DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS: We do not anticipate that any special traffic control will be required with the deliveries to this project. Delivery traffic will use the construction access. In the case where such control is required the contractor will coordinate with the City Engineering Department. IDLING POLICY. All delivery vehicles and onsite vehicles are not allowed to idle for more than five minutes, with the exception of generators or PTO type operations. 6.5 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN: No traffic control plan is anticipated to be necessary for this site. 7.0 PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION 7.1 GENERAL: Pedestrians will not be affected by this construction. 8.0 SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL 8.1 REQUIREMENTS: Sediment and erosion control BMPs will be implemented prior to construction. Silt Fence will be installed at the toe of disturbance. This will be reinforced by log waddles. Temporary stockpiles will have log waddles or other appropriate BMPs installed at the base of the pile. BMPs shall be utilized to ensure that sediment does not leave the construction site. 8.2 SMUGGLER MOUNTAIN RESTRICTIONS: This project is not within the Smuggler Mountain Superfund Zone. 9.0 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL 9.1 FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN: The contractor shall use water or other BMP's as necessary and appropriate, to control and minimize the dust inside the tunnel and building. 10.0 EMISSIONS 10.1 GENERAL: All construction vehicle and equipment onsite will be properly maintained such that the engines will function within manufacturer's standards or parameters. 10.2 EMISSIONS FROM DIESEL POWERED ENGINES: Emissions from diesel engines shall be of a shade or density no darker than 40% opacity, except for starting motion no longer than 10 seconds or for stationary operation not exceeding 10 seconds. 11.0 NOISE SUPPRESSION 11.1 GENERAL: The noise limit for construction is 80 decibels measured at the property line of the construction site. All construction equipment shall be adequately muffled and maintained to minimize project noise. 11.2 NOISE SUPPRESSION PLAN: A Noise Suppression Plan is not anticipated for this construction project. A plan will be submitted to the City Engineering Department if any activity that generates noise in excess of 80 decibels at the property line is anticipated onsite. 11.3 REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIVITIES EXCEEDING 80 DECIBELS: 1. Any work producing noise levels over 80 decibels is not permitted to commence until after 9:00 am and is not permitted on Saturdays. That includes but not limited to the use of compressors, generators, jackhammers, power equipment, nail guns, drilling machinery, earth moving equipment and similar load construction activities. This does not restrict quiet work inside and outside that does not require a power source, including a battery, on Saturday. 2. Notify neighbors within three hundred (300) feet of the project informing them of the kinds of equipment, expected noise levels and durations of loud work. Including the variation of noise levels during a typical construction days may be helpful. Such notification must be in writing and be done seven (7) days prior to the starting time of the project. Communication with neighbors can prevent complaints from arising, and resolve concerns before there is a problem. Provide a phone number where the foreman can be reached prior to the start of the job. 3. Operate equipment in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and with all standard manufacturers' mufflers and noise -reducing equipment in use and in properly operating condition. 4. Post notices to inform workers, including sub -contractors, about the basic noise requirements, as well as specific noise restrictions, to the project. 5. Install noise barriers around all equipment/activities. Noise barriers not only significantly reduce construction noise, but they also provide an extra benefit of "hiding" the noise producing sources, thus increasing a neighbor's tolerance. 6. Move portable loud equipment including generators, compressors, and cement mixers to different sides of the property to reduce impacts on individual neighbors. 7. The use of radios on the site before 8:00 am is not allowed. 11.4 SPECIFIC RESTRICTIONS RELATED TO MANUFACTURED ON-SITE: No manufacturing activities are anticipated with this project. Prepared By: Sopris Engineering, LLC John Petaisto, P.E. Fx� f5tr 3 COLORADO FLOODPLAIN AND STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Pr Flood Plain Development Permit Application Information Date 11/03/2014 Parcel Number 273707300012 Permit Number Owner Mustang Holdings II Telephone214-720-1688 Address 715 W Main St., Ste 201, Aspen, CO 81611 Contractor Brikor Telephone 970-923-3088 Address 20 Sunset Dr #1, Basalt, CO 81621 Project Location/Directions 69 Shady Lane, Aspen, CO 81611 Project Description Single Family Residential New Construction Channelization Multi -Family Residential Substantial Improvement (>50%) Fill Manufactured (Mobile) Home Improvement (<50%) X Bridge/Culvert Non -Residential Rehabilitation Levee Other/Explanations Flood Hazard Data Watercourse Name Roaring Fork River The project is proposed in the X Floodway. _ Floodway Fringe Base (100 -year) flood elevation(s) at the project site 7831 Elevation required for Lowest Floor N/A Floodproofng N/A Source Document / Report /Maps FEMA FIRM #0809700203, FIS #08097CV001A, SE BRIDGE FLOOD STUDY, 10/30/2014 Proposal Review Checklist X Site development plans depict the floodway and base flood elevations N/A Engineering data is provided for map and floodway revisions X Floodway certification and data document no increases in flood heights X Subdivision proposals minimize flood damage and protect utilities N/A Lowest floor elevations are above the base (100 -year) flood level N/A Manufactured (mobile) homes are elevated and adequately anchored N/A Non-residential floodproofmg designs meet NFIP watertight standards Other Continued on next form. VERSION: JANUARY 2006 REFERENCE: COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION FIGURE CH3'SF1 OZA BOARD FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION COLORADO FLOODPLAIN AND STORMWATER CRITERIA MANUAL Flood Plain Development Permit, continued Permit Action Permit Approved: The information submitted for the proposed project was reviewed and is in compliance with approved flood plain management standards (site development plans are on file) Permit Denied: The proposed project does not meet approved flood plain management standards (explanation is on file) Variance Granted: A variance was granted form the base (100 -year) flood elevations established by FEMA consistent with variance requirements of NFTP regulations Part 60.6 (variance action documentation is on file) Flood Plain Administrator's Signature Comments Development Documentation Date Map Revision Data: Certified documentation by a registered professional engineer of as -built conditions for flood plain alterations were received and submitted to FEMA for a flood insurance map revision. Fill Certification: A community official certified the elevation, compaction, slope and slope protection for all fill placed in the flood plain consistent with NFTP regulations Part 65.5 for flood insurance map revisions. Elevation Certificate: Certified as -built elevation of the building's lowest floor floodproofing level . An Elevation Certificate (Part 11) completed by a registered professional engineer or land surveyor certifying this elevation is on file Certificate of Occupancy or Compliance Issued Date VERSION: JANUARY 2006 REFERENCE: I FIGURE CH3-SF102B COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION (=�/5 t l- Y Beach Suite 4210 Environmen+a) 0133 Prospector Rd. I Tel: 970.925.3475 l Aspen, C081611 Fax: 970.925.4754 www.beachenvironmental.com October 14, 2014 Mr. John Petaisto, P.E. Sopris Engineering 502 Main Street Carbondale, CO 81623 Re: Shady Lane Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Dear John: On June 5, 2014, Beach Environmental completed a wetland evaluation and delineation of small pedestrian bridge replacement site along the Roaring Fork River in Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. The attached report is being submitted to provide the Client with a summary of our findings and attached photographs and drawings showing no proposed impacts to wetlands by the replacement bridge. While wetlands were found to exist within the areas subject to the bridge replacement, and were staked for inclusion in a site survey & site plan, the project as proposed will not impact wetlands. Wetlands were primarily identified as being below the ordinary high water mark of the Roaring Fork River. There are exceptions to this on the property but not within the proposed area of bridge placement. No temporary or permanent impacts are proposed as the replacement pedestrian bridge will completely span the river and the new bridge abutments will be outside of the delineated wetlands, and outside of the Ordinary High Water Mark of the river. During the site reconnaissance, the river was near peak flow conditions and the flow line of the river remained well below top of bank. Please call on me if you have any questions about our conclusions. Sincerely, By L__ J Gary L. Beach, u L 8: zl, 65 shady lane WL rpt.wpd WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT This report and all work completed to delineate wetlands for the 69 Shady Lane Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Project has been completed in accordance with the 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual" and appropriate supplements. The field work was completed on June 5, 2014 at the request of John Petaisto of Sopris Engineers, professional engineer for the pedestrian bridge replacement project. Pronertv Description, Location and Acreaee Evaluated The property evaluated includes the area 100 feet upstream and 80 feet downstream of the existing private pedestrian bridge crossing from the right bank of the Roaring Fork River to a small island in the center of the river. The existing pedestrian bridge is located in an un -surveyed section of land in Aspen, Colorado, calculated to be in the NW'/4 NW'/4 SW'/4 of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the Sixth Principle Meridian (see Aspen, Colorado Quad map and site location map attached as an appendix to this report). The bridge crosses a portion of the Roaring Fork River from the right bank of the river to an island in the middle of the river. The bridge is more specifically located at approximately 39'1 V44"N and 106°49'51 "W at an elevation of approximately 7,843' MSL and the new bridge will span the wetland areas beneath the bridge. The new bridge abutments are proposed to be placed within upland areas away from the top of the stream banks. The impacts described herein, and as proposed, will not affect any jurisdictional waters of the U.S. There is an existing bridge pier on the right bank consist of a 12" steel pipe column that is anchored into the stream bank with concrete. In order to preserve the existing integrity of the bank, the steel pipe will be cut off at the surface of the concrete anchor, removed and disposed of the delineated wetland area. As a result no dredging is proposed for this location. The bridge site consists of gentle slope on the right bank and a sharply -incised, but shallow bank on the left bank of the river. The existing pedestrian bridge crosses the river at a point approximately 150 feet downstream of the separation of the river into two braids. The existing bridge will be replaced by a similar wood and steel bridge that will provide for safer access to and from the island. Areas along the banks are primarily populated by upland and fringe vegetation, including narrowleaf cottonwood, Englemann spruce, Colorado blue spruce, aspen, western alder, Bebb willow, Woods Rose, Goldenbanner, wild iris, alpine current, twin - berry honeysuckle, spirea, juniper, dandelion, and grasses such as Junegrass, Western wheat grass, Arizona fescue, American Sloughgrass, and Spike Bentgrass. Several areas on the island contain Colorado juncus, sedges, Englemann spruce, Page 2 Beach Environmental Colorado blue spruce, birch, thin -leaf alder, twin -berry honeysuckle, and grasses such as wheatgrass and foxtail. However, the areas containing hydrophytic vegetation exist outside of the proposed impact areas of the bridge. The area underneath the existing bridge on the right bank of the river contains a small amount of horsetail. Narrative Description of Wetlands Evaluated & Delineated The weather in June was warm, with afternoon temperatures during the evaluation approaching 75 degrees Fahrenheit. The days preceding the field work were dry and there were no factors apparent that would have affected the evaluation. Neither flood nor drought conditions were noted. Following a general inspection of the proposed pedestrian bridge site (hereinafter referred to as the bridge envelope) and immediately surrounding areas, a site specific evaluation of the envelope and potentially impacted area was completed to determine the existence of wetlands. On the right bank side of the pedestrian bridge, wetland indicators were found to exist below the ordinary high water mark and immediately adjacent to the stream both upstream and downstream of the existing bridge. Several areas were noted where the soils were saturated and hydrophytic vegetation existed. The vegetation was inventoried, and a dominance of phreatophytes was found along river banks and immediately adjacent areas. The vegetative community included Colorado juncus, several sedges, Narrowleaf cottonwood, Peachleaf willow, and Bebb willow. These plants were concentrated within a specific area of the bridge envelope, as shown on the attached survey. Although not all areas delineated met all wetland indicator criteria, a conservative approach was used to qualify the delineated boundaries to include these areas. The wetland area immediately east of the bridge on the right bank was comprised of small areas that were saturated to the surface, soils that were soft and spongy to the step, river cobbles and small potholes of standing water. Water temperature was measured at 48 degrees Fahrenheit. Soil bores were taken at numerous locations and the chroma, color and hue of the soil did not always support a finding of hydric soils, although reduction of minerals, gleying and mottling were recognized within a few samples. Soil values were determined using a Globe Soil Color chart. Mottling appeared to be 2% more or less in the samples where mottling occurred. Colors ranged from light brown sands to dark brown sandy loams. Soils in this delineated area above the right bank of the bridge were generally comprised of decomposing organic materials in the "A" horizon which ranged between 0" and 2" in depth. Soils were saturated to damp and dark brown . Reduction of iron was apparent at 12" in depth and clays were noted in several bores to below 17". Refusal in the bore holes occurred in only one instance in the delineated area, at depths of 6". This appeared to be the extent of the topsoil in this area and small bits of gravel were produced below Page 3 Beach Environmental the point of refusal. Areas along both river banks of the Roaring Fork River exhibited scour and deposition conditions. Scour of the left bank has steepened this bank, whereas the right bank was less affected. The right bank was noted to have several areas of debris deposits from high water and a few of these areas had standing water under the debris. On the right bank of the existing pedestrian bridge, wetland areas were found to exist below the Ordinary High Water Mark of the River. On the left bank, wetlands were delineated at and below the Ordinary High Water Mark and at an area below the bridge extending into the island (but not at the location of the proposed bridge abutment). A sedge and juncus meadow exists south of the left bank where the topography drops and groundwater appears to be nearer to the surface. The proposed left bank bridge abutment will be placed away from both the OHWM and the sedge/juncus wetland. Justification for Wetland Boundaries The boundaries indicated on the attached drawing were staked by Beach Environmental and surveyed by Sopris Engineering. Prior to the commencement of any earthmoving on site the delineated wetland areas will be fenced off to prevent any sidecast or accidental incursion. Wetland boundaries were established and staked in the field at limits defined by conditions and include hydrologic, vegetative and topographic break points. Not all of the lands within the delineated boundary displayed all three necessary characteristics of a jurisdictional wetlands, and in some cases were only identified as being within the ordinary high water mark of the Roaring Fork River; some contained only hydrologic and vegetative indicators. Indicators in the sedge and juncus wetland included both primary and secondary evidence of hydric soils, proper hydrology, and a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation. Existing Field Conditions The condition of both upland and wetland areas immediately adjacent to the private pedestrian bridge has been naturally degraded by deposition of materials from river flows. There is gravel, sand, litter, debris, and detritus both upstream and downstream of the bridge on the right bank and erosion of the bank face at the current the left bank abutment. Hydrologic Source The source of water for the wetland areas adjacent to the private pedestrian bridge is the Roaring Fork River, and alluvium, both of which are tributary to the Colorado River at Glenwood Springs, Colorado. Plant Communities Noted Page 4 Beach Environmental The project site includes a very narrow transition between upland areas and wetland areas. The site is populated primarily by upland vegetation including Narrowleaf cottonwood, Englemann spruce, a variety of shrubs, and native and introduced grasses. As described previously, the wetland areas delineated as part of this study included sedges, juncus, a small amount of horsetail, and willow shrubs. The wetlands that exist on site can be classified as, Unconsolidated -Bottom Wetland. Palustrine Class Unconsolidated -Bottom includes Subclasses Cobble -Gravel, Sand, Mud, Organic, and Vegetated. This classification occurs in various water regimes from permanently -flooded to intermittently -flooded. It contains seasonally emergent vegetation that germinates once the waters recede. The vegetative community of the delineated wetlands includes Colorado juncus (Juncus confusus), spike rush (Eleocharis pauciora), horsetail (Eguisetum arvense), and grasses including Spike bentgrass (Agrostis exarata),American Sloughgrass (Beckmannia syzigache), and Alpine Timothy (Phleum alpinus). A shrub layer of vegetation includes Bebb willow (Salix Bebbiana), Twin -berry Honeysuckle (Distegia involucrata), and Alpine currant (Ribes alpinum). Also located within the wetland areas were Narrowleaf cottonwood (Populus angustifolia) and Thinleaf Alder (alnus tenuifolia) and grasses including wheatgrass, foxtail, and brome. The wetland indicator status of the sedges and rushes contained on site is obligate, however, due to rocky soil conditions along the bank, the occurrence of sedges and rushes throughout the under story was estimated to be less than 3%. The indicator status of the willow is obligate, and alder is facultative wet. Consequently, the dominant vegetative species within the wetland boundary have a 67% to 99% probability of occurrence in wetlands. Soil Description and Manned Area The soils found on site are typical in this area and are formed in alluvium derived dominantly from sandstone and shale. Permeability is moderate, as is available water capacity. While no clay layer was found to exist on site, soils ranged between mostly sandy loams to a few areas of loamy clay. Observed colors for the soil bores ranged between brown and dark brown for soils between 5" and 14". Soil bores taken near the center of the wetland area to the west and north of the pedestrian bridge envelope were common at 7.5 YR 2.5/3, meaning the soil was brown throughout and mottling was typically less than 2%. Soils near the river on the right bank had a hue, value and chroma of l OYR 2/2 with minor indications of mottling. Soil colors at the left bank (upstream of the bridge) were typical at 5YR 2.5/2 and 7.5YR 2.5/2. There was infrequent indication of reduction in most of the soil samples evaluated, and a low indication of hydric characteristics. The soils were generally dry to slightly damp throughout the samples, but the dominant vegetative species in this Page 5 Beach Environmental location was Colorado juncus. The delineator relied upon his experience to establish the boundary based on topography, contributory ground water, and vegetative dominance. Observed Interstate or Foreign Commerce Connection The site evaluated is a residential property with an existing pedestrian bridge between the right and left banks of the right reach of the Roaring Fork River. All properties in the immediate vicinity are residential and therefore no connection to interstate or foreign commerce is apparent. However, while recreation use of the river is apparent in this area, no sale of fish, shellfish or other aquatics is possible at this site; and there was no industrial, agricultural or commercial use of the private pedestrian bridge being made at the time of the wetland evaluation/delineation. Waters of the United States The Roaring Fork River flows from east to west across the property and is braided just upstream of the pedestrian bridge creating a small island between the two braids. The Roaring Fork River is navigable during run-off season, but no special aquatic sites were noted at either end of the proposed bridge envelope. Findings and Conclusions The work completed to identify and delineate jurisdictional wetlands rendered a finding that while jurisdictional wetlands occur on the property, they do not occur in areas proposed for installation of a replacement pedestrian bridge. By design, the abutments for the bridge will lie wholly outside of the ordinary high water mark of the Roaring Fork River and the delineated wetlands. No dredging, discharge of dredge material, or bridge structures will impact jurisdictional wetlands. End. Contact Information Report completion date: October 14, 2014 Completed by: Gary L. Beach, MSEE, CES Beach Environmental, LLC 0133 Prospector Road, Suite 4114C Aspen, Colorado 81611 970-925-3475 Email to: gaty@beaelu-esource.com 0-z") EXHIBIT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE 11 REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: C�1 �InuQ Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 2015- STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: V__�Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. C Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage _, r;prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the OB i'T;A q C13:p'topeity�subject to the development application. The names and addresses of ')!I;Au'?YS,'.4""'ro,pertowners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they „ •. . ;,-„!�.x appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of die owners artd govermnental agencies so tzoticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued 017 neat page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me thist°1 day of lkI uv-d� 2015�, by A-I-=, PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS W HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL RE:89 SHADY LANE:SPECIAL REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Ihel a vvublk head n Ior a special review will be held on Tuesday,Aptlpl A,f Tih 2015 atemeeting inbegin at430p.m.before My comunission expires: the AePen Planning and Zoning Cemrlllasge•Ed, ter Cities Heating oom,Ciy ryell,130 S.Galena St,kpen Cody Leer an aprofofonstangH b �j^ 1 �n e1wThe aPPlhilecti on P0sin of Mustang rygldY C\�p6 Ol A lopps II,Il8 Shady Lane,owner of me augect ro .erry. The applicant is proposlnp 10 demolish and replace en existing pedestrian bridge over ine : Notary Public Roaring Fork River at the subjeasSEGatirestrit ctpproper ever the Igalty the S bbl°ktlof Hunter Creek 8 50111 Wajgn ine can. NW COnor of R ofRpparbe'of Wound�eao^ossa a KAREN REED PATTERSON 08RGW qq CO b the Hallam Land CO TI in the Readarallel ing Fork he R ver'H bit26ng to the N the N 8 S BK NOTARY PUBLIC 780 of the to.ingbk of Fork Riven with coursas WILY B NLy ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: STATE OF COLORADO RoerintpO Fork River TH Hf889 4ek at 4' NOTARY junction20 fl oine _ NOTARY ID#19964002767 Ing thplact�ereto rf beg togemeix rrqwitn au water tits pedam- ' PUBLICATION My Commission Expires February 15,2016 311 PG Asian,Pik BCounlry 00;0ra o'y and TomSE o-a� kH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) a"Ilias 6e9ryl Shady Lane. Kor further informationygntast i c°,o°Ip"r°adp,Cyt°X203 i �Ga epos St..As;e„", OWA'ERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGE11'CIES NOTICED C ASM zg15 ;031222)Aspen Times°"H°"",9m, CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE iD BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: cog (,oscrJ Aspen, CO SCIIEDUI ED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: itrL 7 20/5 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1 )rt1 EnS r (name,please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less'than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(f5) days prior to the public hearing on theday of_jjet tuf 20 /5, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the ported notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method ofpublic notification and a copy of any documentation that ryas presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. !1 Sjgnatti ft L� The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this 2o day of 7y&-M 20 15 , by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MICHAEL S HOLMES My commission expires: Fla, /17 Notary Public State of Colorado Notary ID 20134037557 Notary Public My Commission Expires Aug 28, 2017 Y ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: COPY OFYfIEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 i a ■ r ■ r y C a El > Y f t O ad d O• NLL�O' N Ni L 'o LL , /n oil NI c N Q CN, 0. c c CE ml JQ v U � oQ m � E cuLO) � CD 0 :Ea 3 CL `a E U m ° 3 E@ 'c � a > mE`ocl a 0 m 0 ° C Q) in sla lFeN. ` � CrrY=a�'{p\�� t�l 'L 1 \� r �f�' ���►iii �� '1'Tt t���q AS �:.:;, r int;! � a� � "�•� , /�' tii�l � � � .- .1 ,SJLf LK,' ��A / � \� � • �• J ;J� *)y �' �e��t7�,4, �� i'1 asC1 ��"��1�� � IV:�`�Sl��•�.a 1 :��` 1