HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.315 Dean St.A110-01
J!:
"
,f
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL ill #
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
l~
" J
A110-01
2737-182-85-001
Sl. Regis Telecom (Verizon Wireless)
315 E. Dean Street
James Lindt
Telecom
Colorado RSA No, 3 Limited Partnership
Closser Consulting LLC
11/28/01
Approved wI Condition
12/3/01
J. Lindt
,-..
.- fiJ;,(cif/l...tL-v VI~ LL>I /"0 ,Lee. {--6
'5 J-Q Pf
/""',
o
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
FROM:
James Lindt, Planning Technician 0L
RE:
Verizon Wireless Telecommunication Facility - St, Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St.
DATE:
November 20,2001
SUMMARY:
Colorado RSA No.3 Limited Partnership, represented by Closser Consulting, LLC,
has applied for the installation of telecommunication equipment to be installed on the
roof of the St. Regis Hotel located at 315 E. Dean St. on behalf of Verizon Wireless _
a telecommunication service provider. The parcel is located outside of the
Commercial Core Historic District and is not within any of the Mountain View
Planes,
The application proposes six (6) panel antennas mounted to the side of the
eastemmost penthouse of the St. Regis Hotel and two equipment cabinets. The
proposed antennas will extend five (5') feet above the roof and be painted to match
the brick of the St. Regis Hotel. The equipment cabinets will be attached to the
interior of the existing parapet wall and will not extend above the parapet wall. The
proposed antennas and equipment will be barely visible from the street on the comer
of Mill St. and Dean St. The comer of Mill St. and Dean St. is the vantage point that
has the highest pedestrian traffic around the hotel. The proposed antennas would be
slightly more visible from the comer of Monarch St. and Dean St., however, this
vantage point has a much lower level of pedestrian traffic.
Staff feels the proposed application meets the standards for telecommunication
equipment, pursuant to Section 26.575.130. Attached are the relevant criteria. Also
attached is the application, containing a picture of the proposed equipment.
Staff recommends The Community Development Director administratively
approve this application with conditions.
ApPLICANT:
Colorado RSA No.3 Limited Partnership, owner, Represented by Closser
Consulting, LLC on behalf of Verizon Wireless.
LOCATION:
315 E. Dean St. (Roof of easternmost penthouse).
ZONING:
Lodge/Tourist Residential PUD (L/TR PUD)
1
r-.
f'\
LOT SIZE:
121,626 Square Feet.
CURRENT AND PROPOSED LAND USE:
Mixed Use, Commercial and Lodging.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Wireless Telecommunication Service Facilities: The Community Development
Director may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an application pursuant
to Section 26.575.130 of the Land Use Code.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A". Referral
Agency comments have been included as Exhibit "B". The application has been
included as Exhibit "C".
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Community Development Director approve the Verizon
Wireless Telecommunication Service equipment proposed for the roof of St. Regis
Hotel, 315 E. Dean St., with conditions:
ApPROVAL:
I hereby approve the Verizon Wireless Telecommunication Service equipment
proposed for the roof of the St. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean St. with the following
conditions:
I. A building permit shall be obtained by the applicant. A copy of this approval shall accompany
the building permit application.
2. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way permit ifthere is a disturbance of the public right-
of-way during construction.
3, The applicant shall obtain a Temporary Encroachment License during construction if the public
right-of-way is to be used for construction storage.
4. The applicant shall submit a traffic control plan if there is an encroachment on the public right'
of-way that affects the normal traffic flow,
5. All material representations made by the applicant in the application shall beadhered to and
considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions
6, The applicant shall paint all antennas the same color as the building.
Ju' Ann Woods, AICP
mmunityDevelopment Director
tJ.~
, date
If /:J-$/t>/
I "
2
APPRO
V€"D
NOf! :: '9
COMMUNiTy . 2001
C/~OPI.iF.NTDi"'~~
ASP.sv -. "'IiTQj>
---
1""'\
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments
Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments
Exhibit C -- Development Application
3
~
f"""',
11
Exhibit A
Telecom. Equipment
F. Review Standards. The following standards ,are designed to foster the City's
safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless
telecommunication services facilities and equipment.:
1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services
facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of
the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive
than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall
apply.
a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any
property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a
building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level
within one~hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed
to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element,
such as a chimney or ventilation pipe, or behind architectural
skirting of the type generally used to conceal HV AC equipment.
Pitched-roof mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a
compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation
pipes.
b, Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned
properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's
height (i.e" a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a
twenty (20) foot monopole), and the setback from any public road,
as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to
the height ofthe monopole,
c, No wireless communication facility may be established within one-
hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless
communication facility except when located on the same building
or structure.
d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property
lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored
within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building.
Staff Finding:
The six (6) proposed Verizon Wireless Antennas will be roof mounted and painted to
match the existing fayade of the St. Regis Hotel. The proposed antennas will be co-
located on the same building as several other telecommunication antennas. The proposed
,-.,
~
antennas are at least one hundred (100) feet from any other building contammg
telecommunication equipment. The proposed equipment cabinets will be fully screened
from view. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
2. Hei[!ht, Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment
shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height
of the given zone district, whichever is more restrictive, In addition:
a. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is
attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for
panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest
portion of that roof, including parapet walls, and the antenna and
support system for whip antennas shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet
above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls.
b. If the building itself exceeds the height limitations of the zone, and
such excess height was legally established (i.e., granted a variance,
approved by PUD, etc.), then the combined height of the building
and antenna shall not exceed the maximum height allowed by such
approval unless determined by the Community Development
Director to be suitably camouflaged,
c. If the building is constructed at or above the zone district's height
limit, or if combined height of the building and the antenna would
exceed the applicable height limit, the additional height of the
antenna must be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in
addition to the standards of this Section) of conditional use review,
Section 26.425.010, unless determined by the Community
Development Director to be suitably camouflaged (in which case
an administrative approval may be granted).
Staff Finding:
The St. Regis Hotel was legally approved to exceed the height limit in the L/TR zone
district by receiving PUD approval. The proposed panel antennas will only extend five
(5) feet over the roof and will be painted to blend into the building. Staff believes the
proposed equipment meets these standards given that they are painted the same color as
the building to camouflage them from sight. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
d. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the
building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in
the "Screening" standards (26.475.l30(F)(5)) below.
J
("'\
~
3. Architectural Compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless
telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the
surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior
materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition:
a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be
constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality
than the materials of the principal use.
b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the
same color as the building or structure to which or on which such
equipment is mounted, or as required by the appropriate decision-
making authority (Community Development Director, Historic
Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, or
City Council, as applicable).
c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is
mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall
be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be
architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing
structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible, and shall
not project above the wall on which it is mounted.
d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching
devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or
maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match
the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or
reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community
Development Director may require a particular design that is
deemed to be suitable to the subject location.
e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or
equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below).
Staff Finding:
To the extent practical, the antennas are compatible with the architecture of the building.
No monopoles or significantly obtrusive equipment will be visible from the street and
staff is not recommending any screening measures be implemented other than painting
the antennas to blend with the building. The panel antennas will be slightly visible from
the street. The equipment cabinets will not be visible from the street because they will be
hidden by the existing parapet wall. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
4. Compatibility With the Natural Environment. Wireless
telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the
surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography, and other
natural features, arid shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant
silhouette on a ridge line. In addition:
("'\ ~
a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the
applicant shall provide computerized, three dimensional, visual
simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate
graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the
affected ridge(s) or ridge line(s); an 8040 Greenline Review,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be
required.
b. Site disturbances shall be minimized, and existing vegetation shall
be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be
demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography
results in less visual impact to the surrounding area.
c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible.
d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment
shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's
regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and
electromagnetic frequency emissions.
Staff Finding:
The proposed location is. not affected by ridgeline, 8040, or mountain viewplane
restrictions. The applicant has committed to meeting FCC regulations regarding the
operation of wireless service facilities. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
5. ScreeninJ!. Roof and ground mounted wireless telecommunication
services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be
screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private
properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing,
landscaping, and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or
surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or
topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition:
a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of
antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees, or
other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend
with their background; and, have no individual antennas or
climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the
appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development
Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning
Commission, or City Council, as applicable).
b. For ground mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to
achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or
equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a
1"'"'\
,~
heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may
be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of
growing within one (I) year to a landscape screen which
satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility.
c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall
be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the
screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any
. cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall
be painted to match the color of the building or other existing
structure.
d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities,
support structures, or accessory and related equipment (including
HV AC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings);
fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and
shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable
materials that are opaque.
e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all
additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual
impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards,
the Community Development Director may allow use of an
alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and
screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural
applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to
screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses.
For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole
may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so
that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and
branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same
degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined
above.
Staff Finding:
The proposed support equipment cabinet will be fully screened from view. No additional
screening is recommended. The antennas will be visible but shall be painted to blend into
the building. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
6. LiJ!htinJ! and SiJ!nuJ!e. In addition to other applicable sections of the code
regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to
wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment:
a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down-
directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or
1"'"'\
l""""\
shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of
illumination off-site.
b. Light fixtures, whether free-standing or tower-mounted, shall not
exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade.
c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public
safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any
wireless communication device or structure is prohibited.
Staff Finding:
The applicant is proposing no lighting or signage related to the proposed
teleconimunication facility. Staff finds that this criterion is not applicable to proposed
application.
d. The telephone number( s) to contact in an emergency shall be
posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of
Chapter 26.510 of the Aspen Municipal Code.
7. Access Wavs. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the
Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities
and equipment shall be regulated as follows:
a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a
required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation
area such that it interferes with, or in any way impairs, the intent or
functionality of the original design.
b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but
access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads
must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response
vehicles and equipment.
c. The proposed easement(s) for ingress and egress and for electrical
and telephone shall be recorded at the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits.
Staff Finding:
The equipment is not proposed in an area of required vehicular circulation. No new
easements are required to be recorded to accommodate the proposed telecommunication
facilities. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
!"""'\
1"'""\
/
Propertv Owner/Applicant:
SLC Aspen Dean Street, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(d/b/a S1. Regis Hotel, 315 E. Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611)
c/o Starwood Hotels & Resorts Trust
2231 E. Camelback, Suite 410
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Applicant for Wireless Telecommunications Facilitv:
Colorado RSA No.3 Limited Pa.rtnership,
a Delaware partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
8350 E. Crescent Parkway, 4th Floor
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Representative of Colorado RSA No.3 Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless:
Ann S. Closser/Gloria Brown
Closser Consulting, LLC
4305 Darley Avenue
Boulder, CO 80305-6027
Telephone: (303) 554-1432
Facsimile: (303) 494-0826
Description of Proposal:
Colorado RSA NO.3 Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon") proposes to
construct a cellular telecommunications facility on the S1. Regis Hotel, 315 East Dean Street,
Aspen, Colorado. The property is owned by SLC Aspen Dean Street, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company.
As shown on the enclosed site plan, all components of the facility will.be located entirely on the
rooftop of the hotel. Six panel antennas (approx. l' wide x 4' tall) will be placed on the roof of
the easternmost penthouse. The tips of the antennas will extend 5' above the penthouse.
Verizon was unable to place the antennas on the penthouse walls because of existing
VoiceStream antennas and reserved space for future VoiceStream antennas. The antennas
. cannot be placed on the west penthouse walls. The west penthouse is lower in height and RF
signals would be blocked by other architectural features of the hotel. The landowner will not
allow antennas to be located on the hotel walls. "Whip" antennas cannot be used at this facility.
Whip antennas are omni-directional and transmit radio signals in all directions. This site will
provide additional capacity to meet increased customer demand for service in the local area-
which demand cannot be handled by Verizon's existing facilities. The signals from .omni-
directional antennas at this location would interfere with Verizon's existing Aspen cellular site.
Verizon proposes to paint the antennas a "light brick" color to match the brick of the hotel and
existing antennas. Verizon's equipment will be located in two equipment cabinets mounted to
an interior parapet wall, with adjacent space reserved for two future cabinets. The cabinets will
not extend above the parapet wall and will not be visible from ground level.
The S1. Regis Hotel location was carefully selected to not only meet customer demands, but
also to conform as closely as possible to the City's regulations. This location corresponds to the
City's first site selection preference and its preference for collocation. (City of Aspen Land Use
,-..,.
^
Regulations ["Regulations"], S 26.575.130.E.2 and 7) The (property is zoned L1TR with a PUD
overlay. Wireless telecommunications facilities are allowed in this zone district subject to review
and approval by the Community Development Director. (Regulations" S 26.575.130.E.1). The
facility is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Regulations (s 26.575.130.A): All
antennas and equipment will be located on the hotel rooftop. As illustrated on the enclosed
photosimulations, the antennas will be visible from discrete areas. The view from Monarch and
Dean was selected as the vantage point most visible to the greatest number of people. The view
from Mill and Dean illustrates the minimal visibility of the site. As a practical matter, the
antennas will not be visible from most areas in the City. Verizon's equipment cabinets will not
extend above the building parapet and will not be visible. The hotel rooftop is an existing
telecommunications site (currently supporting the facilities of at least two wireiess carriers on its
rooftop), thus avoiding the unnecessary proliferation of facilities.
Response to Review Standards (Reaulations Ii 26.575.130.F:
1. Setbacks.
a. Verizon's penthouse-mounted antennas are concealed from nearly all ground level
locations by existing hotel architectural elements. The antennas will be painted a "light
brick" color to match existing antennas and the brick color of the hotel. Verizon believes
that any additional architectural element surrounding the antennas would create greater
bulk and result in additional visual impact.
b. Not applicable.
c. Verizon's facility will be located on the same building as existing wireless facilities.
d. Verizon's antennas will not extend beyond property lines or into a front yard area.
2. Heiaht.
a. Verizon's antenna will not exceed five feet above the penthouse to which they will be
attached.
b. Verizon's antennas will not exceed the relevant height limitations.
c. Not applicable.
d. Verizon's equipment cabinets will be located on the building rooftop. The cabinets will
not extend above the building parapet and will not be visible.
3. Architectural Compatibilitv.
a. Verizon's facility will not require the construction of an additional structure. Equipment
cabinets will be located on the building rooftop, beneath the level of the parapet. The
cabinets will be of equal quality and similar in nature to existing wireless equipment
cabinets and other existing rooftop equipment.
b. Verizon's antennas will be painted to match existing antennas and the light brick color of
the hotel. Related equipment cabinets are discussed above.
c. Not applicable; the equipment will not be mounted to the building wall.
d. Not applicable; the facility will not include a monopoie.
e. Utilities to the facility will be run underground. Cable runs to the antennas and equipment
will not be visibie from ground level.
4. Compatibilitv with the Natural Environment All components of Verizon's facility will be
located on the St. Regis Hotel rooftop and will not dominate the landscape or present any
silhouette on a ridge line.
a. Not applicable.
b. Not applicabie; there will be no ground-mounted components.
c. This modest facility will have little, if any, effect on surrounding view planes.
d. In accordance with Verizon's FCC license to provide cellular service in Aspen, this
facility must comport with all FCC regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and
electromagnetic frequency emissions.
2
,-..,.
t'1
5. Screeninq. Verizon's equipment cabinets will be located on the rooftop, fully screened by
existing parapet walls. Verizon's penthouse-mounted antennas will be painted to match
existing antennas and the hotel walls. The antennas will be visible at ground level from only
very limited areas.
a. Not applicable; no monopole will be utilized.
b. Not applicable; there will be no ground-mounted components.
c. All cabies to the facility will be compietely concealed from public view.
d. Not applicable; no fencing will be utilized.
e. The visual impact of the facility will be mitigated as discussed above.
6. LiqhtinQ and SiQnaQe. Not applicabie; no lighting or signage will be utilized.
7. Access Wavs.
a. Not applicable; the installation will have no ground-mounted cornponents.
b. The facility will be secured from access by the general public (locked access to the hotel
rooftop); through its lease with the property owner, Verizon will have 24-hour access to
the facility in the event of emergency.
c. Easements for ingress and egress and electrical and teiephone service currently exist
and are recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
3
Closser Consulting Limited Liability Company
4305 Darley Avenue
Boulder, CO 80305-6027
Tel. 303.554.1432
Fax 303.494.0826
Ann Closser Email: adosser@idcomm.com
Gloria Brown
November 9, 2001
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS
James Lindt, Planner
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena SI., 3rd Floor
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Colorado RSA No.3 Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Application for approval of Wireless Telecommunications Facility
at St. Regis Hotel, 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, CO 81611
(Verizon Project Name: C03 Aspen Highlands - Alt 1)
Dear Mr. Lindt:
Enclosed are two copies of the following documents, which constitute the application of
Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC for approval of a wireless telecommunications facility at the St. Regis
Hotel, 315 East Dean Street, Aspen, Colorado (the numbers correspond to the items listed in the July
18,2001 Pre-Application Conference Summary):
(1) Land Use Application;
(2) Proof of Ownership (two sets of title work, evidencing fee title vested in SLT Aspen Dean
Street, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company);
(3) Fee Agreement, signed by Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC;
(4) Copy of letter signed by the property owner, authorizing Verizon to proceed with this
application and setting forth the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the
representatives authorized to act on behalf of the property owner/applicant (we will submit
the originally signed letter upon receipt);
(5) Certificate from Title Insurance Company of the Rockies setting forth the street address
and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, names
of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgment, liens, easements, contracts
and agreements, and demonstrating the owner's right to make this application (see no. (2)
above);
(6) Check in the amount of $680.00 to cover the City of Aspen's application review fee;
(7) Two copies of all documents listed are enclosed;
(8) Vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen (included on site plan);
(9) Site plan, including roof plan illustrating existing and proposed facilities;
(10) Photosimulations (two "before and after" views), one view from Mill and Dean Streets and
the second view from Durant and Monarch Streets; and
(11) Written description of the proposal, addressing relevant review standards. (see enclosed
site plan for graphic illustrations)
!"""'\
("'\
;j
James Lindt
Page 2
November 9, 2001
In addition, two copies of the following documents are enclosed in response to Attachment 4,
Specific Submission Contents:
(1) Site plan (see no. 9 above);
(2) Site Improvement Survey;
(3) Landscape plan - not applicabie (no ground-mounted components);
(4) Elevation drawings or before and after photographs (see nos. 9 and 10 above);
(S) Lighting plan - not applicable (there will be no lighting of Verizon's rooftopfacility);
(6) Structural Integrity Report regarding towers (not applicable; no tower will be used);
(7) FAA and FCC Coordination:
(a) Not applicable (the facility is not near an airfield)
(b) Pursuant to Verizon's FCC license, the proposed facility must and will comply with all
FCC regulations governing radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions
(8) Not applicable - the facility will be collocated on an existing wireless telecommunication
services facility;
(9) Not applicable - the location of the facility corresponds to the City's first site selection
preference; and
(10) Verizon is currently planning one additional facility in the Aspen Airport Business Center.
Verizon is working with Pitkin County in connection with this proposed facility.
Thank you for your consideration of this application. I understand the Verizon submittal will be
reviewed administratively. Thank you in advance for expediting the City's processing of Verizon's
application. Please let me know (303-670-8702) if you require further information or documentation,
and we will respond immediately.
Very truly yours,
Glq~(g~
Assistant to Ann S. Closser
/gb
encls.
cc: Ms. Jane Johnson, Verizon Wireless
~~ ~~,.... ." ".." ..._~ ~ "...,
," ."""..~~
',.."Rl~""; _"_:>:", '~~r.'.'<li'"
~" . ',- . ~"';:\>: . ........;-y~-"'
" ~".
--..,.
'"
&ili
III
I
~
!b'~
0,j
ill
iN:
I
I
~
""~-
~;,.,
,\pi.;.~
;;. ..-
,.::",:,,:~...-.
S1MUlAT1OOIlSlcUlSTAA'Tlv("",,-t"'''''!!I\AA..cl!'OIAVVAAV
llO!:TOCOO$l'RIJf.llONloIETH:')DS.T&AEOVC,o,VA.clVoEATlolEll
\I1SljO,'ElM~TS',I..c.ISM:;lTRES~eLEFORVAAlIlTroNS
llE1"M!l':OITll1S'exf<lt'lTANOI\PPEO;~OFCClilPlETEC
~TIIlC1JON: .
"''^''
--
30368618eO www"~Mn" eom
VROl0901
~
~~-
PR~~OSEO 'v,Ew . "'c03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS au SITE SIMULATION
MIU AND DEAN LOOKING WEST .. .
',".'
"','.;k".",,",<0<,"^"",k
_"'F"'~",' ~,
"".,,;.;..M"
ki!I;>
,....",
ill
~
I
;iJ
~~
i
III
~
~
d
;&j
Ii!
I
I
~
.,
i.ih1
III
I
1':
Ii!
I:l
f';,
i
~'"'
;;i!
!.Ii
EXISTING VIEW
~
..
M'
~1
"""
i$ij
!III
lmi
~
"'"
J,;;:,
~
"'"
;Ii
I
ii01
~
it0J
iIII
~
>&;
iil
ill
III
~
I!l
#'i
~
II
~
iifrA
!W
..
I
II
I
~
I
~
if'
~
t!t
~
_'-~ 1-'<-
C03 ASPEN HIGHLANDS CEIl SITESI^-\OLATI()N
MONARCH AND DURANrLOOklNCSOlim ... .
$MI,jI.AT.,..'StLCllSTAAT!VE.,""",'''''''''''M..:;EWlV",^fO'I'
otJ,ElOCONSTIIIIeTIONMETfCOO:'Tlde'OF",VAfiDv.Q..THfll
\IIS,-",LE~ROIe.lEN'TS.'NC'I$~nl~Fl')NSlBL.EFOFt\lAAlA.TlOKS
BETI'oEE~THlSEiCotBITAI(lAPPE/l-':EOFCOMPl-ETEl;"
CO~TR\lCllON
, 9/1001
~r~
3036881880.........YiNnvcom
"""",'"
:f'
",,",,,,,,.,,,' '-'{",M
*-" 1M. ',)
f\
~
"
~
v
~
o
'Jo
m
o
:s
~
1"\
8
,,~
>;::il
::;;z
Z::J:
>-
'Joel
:"::J:
~>
Oz
00
;::'"
ZI"\
"'"
z:=
0",
..-
....;:;:1
:l:
~:a
ml:
~c:
~
o
z
'1:'18 f~,~
.. t"}:Jl'~.-' ..'
l.:; ~; ~fi
",",~' ;.",i<~$
~ ~ ':' _...4 :\'?,"
", "".,.",1iili~'
, :,~2k,,\
-,.i~--'"--,, 4-;:i,~*~
~~b~ _<'!\
':,C:,:-~j\ t'''-~f:'''~~
Im~
-ii~!
gill ~::
~~~!:i
:!<il2~
"I,
li!j
!~i>
'~'l
o~,
H
.I<!
@~~~
i'
8
<~~
~gl
=l(
i:1
!
Ii"'-
-'^'
m
X
'Jo
::'
z
"
:s
~
., ~ ,( ~",
.;;>"
':~~a~"
~,~ \ ' .,l'"",,~'
j\....!~_,'o/
; <;~(,:)~. ".$:::1:;)
""" '::.:"r-:':n,'~~!:t~
:-~ ~:, '"~~~-'l-;;~...;
,~ ~. ",,;;:\
''".~~:~~;:~~
:c\\:l:C;\,'''':'
~
,.~,'''''''~~'-
-'':'9/\:f''
t;j,)
""
~
,~"
'~:'I
;;":
'5':
.cl
~;i:j
,;,~
.1
~'1
f.c
v'
q
", I
JU~"13--1:jC(J ;j.3:5G
F'. J2
......, .....' _.."'~ .. - ,.
r-'\
l""""\
I
Re: V..-IZX)n Wir9len A;>pIleallon 'l9r WII'9I(l$> TelecommunlcatiQl'!s I=acility
at lfle .t. Reg. "'*131'5 ellVt Dean St,..t. Aspen, CO
!
AUTItOftlZATlOij
~ ~.me. 1IdcInt88 ~nd tel8pl1o"e number of!h~ QWl'll8'r of !hlil property which is
the SlI~ of the ~rbed application is: .
SLT At~ Sn-.et LtC
(;/0 $,* HoIels & R(ftQ1"\8 Trulrt
2231 e.c:k Road. Sui'll! 410
PhoenIX, AZ 85016
(914) 64Q..81OO .
I
Iltnby .~rlt8 erizon WII'8kII!5 (yAW) I.l.C. 8350 East C~_"l Parkway,
#400. G,""WOOCI ViI.. CO 80111, (303.121.3566), and ita agenll CIO$S.' !
ConsuItlngLlmlWd u.t>>n' company. 4305 Darley Avenue, Boulder', CO 80~OZT,
(303-&&.1101432), 10 p wllh It. lll)pllcatlon to tl'Ie C"1ty of Aspen to aHow a wi.ale"s
teleCOm~' f.IC1l 8t the St, Fl<$9I$ Hotel. 315 East Dean Street, A~eh, co
81811. '
SL T A$pen Deat'l Street I.l.C
dlbltl St. R~et .,
By: ) ~~~
I'
?II~
Dated.
,2001
303Q7oaS38
=~ EXECUTiVE OFFlCES ,TE~~705441191
i
10/26' 01 15: 46
T:Jn:~L p. 21~
".....,
e "
o
" ""<',,~;j..
130 S. Galena S/
AspenC081611
(970) 920-5090
(970) 920-5439, fax
Asp~n/Pitkin
Com~unity
Dev~lopment
Dep~rtment
Fax
To: Gloria Brown From: James Lindt
Fax: (303) 494-0826 Pages:
Phone: Date: 12/3/01
Re: St. Regis Telecom. Approval CC:
o Urgent
o For Review
o Please Comment 0 Please Reply
o Please Recycle
. Comments:
Hi Gloria,
Please find attached a copy of the approval document for the St. Regis Telecom. Application. You will
be required to obtain a building permit prior to installing the antennas. Please present this approval
document when you apply for building permit.
Thanks,
James Lindt
o
zm
.00
tf)1-0
(/)--.Jr---
w<(~
--.J l'0
w(/)~
0::: Cl ..q-
3z00
<(N
--.J
Z:J: .
000
N-z
-:J:
0::: .
WZ-'
>wo
0...0:::
(/)0...
<(
I
l'0
o
U
"?
~
7926.4
~
.
co
<<S
?;t
'"
7929.0
'"
~~
(~ - '"
'-..,," I
-,. I.,
<... <c",
>: 8~
I ,. "';;;-
>-W '" '"
:s: 0 t:.
tV "",
~ .'"
-' '" c.:
lull) ~ ~
0::: '" '"
C:l "'.,
a<::i~
C)"Z ~t;'
~"'"
"'t2.
"'",
"'<:
."'.... c:I <>
...... Cl.. a:
-
<:i
;;?
'"
COlIS
l?.4ST ^r'b
uU"4.!\.7'
S75'09'11" .4 {? l?Nol?
E: 120.62'
~
'"
""1
-oor....
-oor."
"'....
OlD
00
lD .....
7926.6
'"
'"
2
"
f;;
[;J
t;
fJ
t:<;..,
~~ '
() .
~
~f1fllf l:l
~
~
'"
co
<<i
q :;?
"
~
(f
is
RAISED ROOF
ELEV.8007.4
N75'00 '00 "
J'U/If, W 172.72'
'.I.4T.4 STRl?ET
'" b
CD
\I
'" ~
." W
-'
<
~
CD
"-
~
I
"-
C
C
g;
~:i
OJ
0\l,J
",==>
tJ>
"''j
drj
0:'"
o. ..
~0~'
-
LOIlt/? /?00F
~ '-
. ~
I ~ Jiio,-
/ 0 ~iJ;
11) 1fl'fS
I' <I.;:t;1'li
Ij~ &.UQ;:
~T
LOT 1
.
o
tv
,.,'
CI)
-
~
.8
<0
,.,
~
-
'"
N75'00 '00 "",
33.88 ....
7931.8
i""""\
I
I
I
/,
/,
-/,
h Its '-
. ~~
/~€!J'"
/I .<f:.';;:/
"Q~
/O/il
fj"o
~~
h~
....
ho
:'>
...
-
h'"
h
H
<..:>
Z
:>=
Z
<
:Z 0-
o ~ci
ffi 8~
::I: <-'
SQ~ w~
FlOo FlOUl
Z::I: oz
-(f) zO
<Vi
.-z ~
~o >-::::: u.J
u..i= ~g FlO
_w< ~
cSos,2 ::si:il ~
>->-u... V>__
e::::ZF ..- a
w<ffi (/)0 w
t;:zu FlOw ~
<i!<a:w .~ ~
C(l)::)~ 'i-,..... W
~$.OL <La.. t:J
-WUo. ~o e::::
>-~UlO
~w~1=:! ~~ ~
W~z< o::Ul .....
U:I:OO ::)z :5
Z"'i=w Ul~ 0-
~zuFlO .-.....
:::E::r:< Z\.L.. 8
OF->-:::!i ~o 0
u;:z~ w>Ul 15
.- <u.. OW .-
<1>>- U').......
=>~~Ul ffo ~
::Ea::::E~ 2& I.J.J
=>=>.-w -=> :c
oV'>z>- C Q.. F
>-SQ~z 0::0:: 0::
l;I:FlOwl=:! 0::;: !:e
5Z0z '1-0 w
o-z<( <l.J.J c::::
01-:z:J: iio__<
<( C,,) ~,b__ .z
a::~...-=-w >-~ 6
SWc..>O::o ~Z w
oOw 0::- e::::
U>-I..I-:E ::>1- LJ.J
oz~o (f)~ :c
I-<:c:~ Ow ~z
<..:>zc..>z ~o:: 00
~~~~ r:-J<' :c:~
\E=>o:::::!i <en :;;~
8E3~8 .....2:' <0
<.J<now OQ U)UJ
<(<C~CD zb: cz
":o(:j SQo::: ~g
~Ol-:> (/)~ <0
!=!=(f)e:::: -w ~<....>
oug;;=> FlOo
z<Cu...V)
~
o
::I:
Ul
Ul
<
Ul
Z
o
i=
~
w
-'
w
Z
o
i=
0-
0:::
u
Ul
::g
-'
<
::3
-'
.-:;
o
1=
Z
o
'-'
Ul
0-
'-'
I
~
0-
Ul
<
u..
o
'),
f;;
[;J
.(:..,
1"0
....1
....'
~
f$
&
Vj
~
u
Z
o
0-
=>
o
~
<
lD
W
0::
<
z
o
~
w
::I:
(f
is
Ul
5
Z
#
..... g
.- <...J <..:>>-< .
<C ztDa::: v
-'I- a.. ooo-'<~
'=0-5 2: :;ow _
?5~O-~ri ~i7i8~t5
Ea~~l.J.J~ a..ffi<3~
~$ai'~-- ~~J81-
"- 00a..... v>__La..<
<rim 0) I.&JI.&J~o~
-J ~I->- (1)0.. 0
c..o:: -<0:: a:Z~n3CD
o~"""Il)< O::::<CQEa::::~
ZO>-N=> => '-0
<1--1 0:::: 0-8&:(/')0
zg~a~ WZI=:!OlD
~oE3g~ FlOI:::i~<~
>w::::!t-z a:::C "0)
g':~5< ::;:E3~~~
:::>u...I-c-r:: I-~<C~N
(/)ow z...:cL, ...
:zWa::::~IJ~ wQ::uzv
::offiFlO~"'-~ :::!iuz.....""
- L- .... W -O::::w
I- '---0)..,- (/)V>::;<Cco
:z Ch < <C!:;;c..o
51-~"""!:( w "" ~
:::!i~~~~ ~!1~~g
Z 0 UlU:::!io
wWzCt:~ 3uz:::::iw
f7;F!'~~g '-'<~::I:\E
<o<2im (j~~~8
5:;~~~ ~I=~:;~
a..z<( a.. .z(/)I-<a..
00",.,-; :g ::g~Ul:;:
wa:::I"")C::O~ wW:iEoQ)
cO W::I:a...t.Jza:::::
ZZBt5t5N~""'OW<~
~~<<if.~O-F!'z~z.....
9:<.-:0- -.....;:<<O~
9:;1-:Z:!:::~~<C,.,...a:::I-~a..
-V>w_ ......<.:z:
(/)0::::2 Na::::Cw--,wo:::o
wG:Q.NN1....n~:::>::iS?w
Coco r-uw.........
~~~gg~g~~~8~
WOl.J.JOOCOOCD
-,-'0
/
/"
Z
8
Wo::
~~
~8
o~ w
~;!~ 0::
wz~ 0 ~
t;;ow 0 0'
;:;:;.'-'cn :::El{')O
- .vN
LLJ:z: Cl a::: en ...
et:oz Om
o:::~<C z......
0- f2 .f5
>-:::Ew :COco
~15g <..:>Zo
a:::La..l.LJ wcnt;
=>Z;;! 0::0:0
~ ~ ~ "IllUv/"f/f":
-' <( ,\\\\ HO.\.:1J1<:*~
< FlO "" >1-' ....... <7-?",%
:z t.. u- ~
Q>-~ ~\~
(/) I- . ~~ .4.::
~ -t!l!1J:. "5t~"", ~-'E
lJ... c.e~: ~'\: :-.1 S
~ =~."" ~'\ :''''is
a.. >=~~C': ....-....., .~~
f$~'.~ ".~;;;
<C F5~.. 'b'I ..~9~
I=:! w~ ~~;'{J"';"."~~~\~ '
< 0:: (3';~" PRu \\\\~
S:2 8 g ~ 'J/fi1tnlllmU\\\W
lJ...:::i < a:::
~ 0::0
0:: 'Ou
wo::-,
(",):z00
(/')oU;z
... 1-lJ.... <
15::I:ow
:::>-Qw=>
~~~~
o::ul-U')
i7l ,- Ul "uO'SI~3illS\lIQV:JV\:0
10 6-01 "'''
~,