HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.200 Sesame St.A102-01
l""""':;
CASE NUMBER
PARCELID#
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
hp
A102-01
2737-074-01004
200 Sesame Street 8040 Greenline Review
200 Sesame Street
Sarah Oates
8040 Greenline Review
Alain Degraeve
Bill Pollock
1/29/02
Reso. #2-2002
Approved wI Condition
8/12/02
S. Oates
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
~
("'"
MEMORANDUM
Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below:
'b-........... City Engineer
0........... Zoning Officer
o ........... Housing Director
'-Q ........... Parks Department
~.......... Aspen Fire Marshal
~.......... City Water
'&........... Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
0........... Building Department
0........... Environmental Health
0........... Electric Department
0........... Holy Cross Electric
0........... City Attorney
0........... Streets Department
o ........... Historic Preservation Officer
0........... Pitkin County Plarming
Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer
Community Development Department
130 So. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611
Phone-920.5441 Fax-920.5439
200 Sesame Street 8040 Greenlioe Review
November I, 2001
REFERRAL SCHEDULE
DRC MEETING DATE:(oote time: 1:30-3:00)
REFERRALS DUE TO PLANNER:
Thank you,
Sarah
November 14, 2001
November 30,2001
r"~""""'"',~",,,,,,,,',:':'"
r"\. !,.AND USE ApPLICATION 1""\
PROJECT:
Name: Pt:b1ZA(i:yG fEt;..''''5>/De:N '-E::.
Location: ~o~ -S€So.ME: $T: '~If) '$t.rNN'( PAp:.~ NO/2"rll <Su'Bl>lV.
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate)
ApPLICANT:
Name:, At.-A/N 'Pcr.:.F4<EVI;'
Address: '2.00 "S ~ ^ 1'\'\ ~ ~
Phone#: ?"4"'t" 011 I
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name: ~1l.-\,..I...tII\ :pb~c..1'- o~ ,%o/..u. "'\ A~ ~vi" e::
Address: 1>ro, '.'j!.QC 'Z.?c~ ,4.. ~ Pe-N I L-C
Phone#: ~-+4" Cfo"'l
TYPE OF ApPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
o Conditional Use 0 Conceptual PUD
o Special Review 0 Final PUD (& PUD Ari1~dment)
o Design Review Appeal 0 Conceptual SPA
o GMQS Allotment 0 Final SPA ( & SPA Amendment)
o GMQS Exemption 0 Subdivision
0" ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream 0 Subdivision Exemption (includes
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization)
Mountain View Plane
o 1,0t Split
o Lot Line Adjustment
o Temporary Use
o TextlMap Amendment
o Conceptual Historic Devt.
o Final Historic Development
o Minor Historic Devt.
o Historic Demolition
o Historic Designation
o Small Lodge Conversion!
Expansion
o Other:
EXISTING CONDITIONS : (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)
I Gx/~-nN(P : ~ U"P'Fe>oM 1'4!i3tOCIJC--I.~
PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)
ffZr=:>F'~D k'17PIT7l:::>A.J : frl~ (.,01(;;;1"", A'dP'f1OA./ ",. AD'PIN f.:.
~Nr: Mr:>raF: 13e;J>; EATtt I tfl<F"AN'C>/Nr- fA, 1\-'711 ,et AD'!>I""" A ~A~^G.t5
ave you attached the following?
Pre-Application Conference Summary
Attachment # I, Signed Fee Agreement
Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form
Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents
Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents,
Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application
FEES DUE: $
~
ASPENIPITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Al!reement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Appli<:ation Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and At..AI/'l- Tl€kMr:;yG.
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for
2.00 .,~ AM/& ""'T~
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000)
establisbes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent
to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of tbe proposed project, it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs' involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following, their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater casb liquidity and will make additional pa)/ffients upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary, as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further ,agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient mfonnation to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a detennination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of $ I "':J"Ilj:.." wbich is for Go. 00 of' hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $205.00
per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments'shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs sball be grounds for suspension of processing,
and in no case will building permits be issued until ,all costs associated with case processing bave been paid.
CITY OF ASPEN
APPLICAN
By:
By:
Julie Ann Woods
Community Development Director
Date:
Mailing Address:
'i. Q) 13ax
~
iq.:).)"
&1611
.....
g: Isupport\forms\agrpayas.doc
1/10/01
(')
n
:,j
<1,0
ATTACHMENt 2
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project:
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
PCb1ZAe.!t;; ~/'W;-IL.A3
1'<t.,4..Ii-J pa~~
2-o~ ?~ ~ r::- '$/",
"fL'I?
IIf f!7?? "J
l":;ilBfi15 - 17 f)p~ b??t}I1GN
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, ot Area may e reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
defmition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Commercial net leasable:
Number of residential units:
Number of bedrooms:
Existing:
Existing:
Existing:
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only):
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area: Existing: ;Z 1i "t B Allowable: ~-;~€> Proposed: 3~1o
Principal bldg. height: Existing: 'Z-"l Allowable: 'l.."i Proposed: "Zit)
Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: - Proposed: '-,i_
On-Site parking: Existing: .'? Required: ."L Proposed: /. f'\o~
% Site coverage: Existing: /I Required: Proposed: 10/.2
% Open Space: Existing: ~E7 Required: Proposed: /!;(;).$.
Front Setback: Existing: 2...?' Required: zrr Proposed: Z,,-
Rear Setback: Existing: It) Required: /0 Proposed: 10
Combined FIR: Existing: ?? Required: ~?'" Proposed: '??
Side Setback: Existing: [0 Required: 10 Proposed: 10
Side Setback: Existing: ID Required: 10 Proposed: 10
Combined Sides: Existing: '2.-" Required: 2.::> Proposed: 2...<>
Existing non-conformities or encroachments:
Variations requested:
~s
~
::
gIg So
=0
-I" ",0"
-t, f:". 0
"l
-
- !~ ,lS-
:;;; 'S
00 "'8 .,
~ ( "l
.,
'" ,lS- ~o
'"
-< os
'" ~ :=; =
~
~ 'll,~ "'0
~ '" "- ,
~ ~ ~
z
~ 'i l~ "'0
:a'
l' "
,..
~ iI" l!l'"
0 .... ., ,,;;t'1
'" e "
(g 1.; '")-- ."
J3 ~ 'Ii j
'" 113
... ~ ~_o :E8
"
S :l! ...-
=!'l
...:l ~ i5 8
~ A1_g:
~3~ 00
~fu, Q('!'\oo_o ;t;!i ~
"l" .,.
!:; oB~.... ....- '" ~~
S ~"';;j ~ ~- - N
~ '" ;:!:
i80 0 ~i~~i"'-~ = '"
'"
.,."'0 0 "'''' ~ ffi" ~~ ~;;;
~ ~U NO ~=~~~~ ~ ~~~__~ 00 ~
...:l ~oo~~ ,..-", ="''''~~'''I O. ~"N".,.", ~~.Q =Z
~ ~~~~ ~~Q~~a ~~O~IQ~_ =_~_ .,g ...
~~~;",~g@8~~~~8S~~8~~~E~ - . ~-
fS B_
~~~ ~O~O~~~ ~-NN~~OO~Z ~
~ ~ZNO~~~OUSNN~ ~8~~
z ~ -OO~~-('!'\~-NN('!'\~_-__N___C~M~O_~ .,."
<M-("'\"o:t"M .,.'" ~
:3 ~ ~ ~Q -~-~~ " .
~E:: .... '''l~ ~.... Ot .... 0__ .,- ~~'
~ t~ "l~~-< U"'O 8~ G ::
-< :!;U
5:' l<:: 00;:> ~'~ ...." S:::l ",,;, ~ 5:' ;! ~,....,~, '" -< ~ Jl~
~:i ~ 8~ ",0 ~~~~~99 ",8~~~~ ",@ 0
~ ~ ~I~ fa g:: E: 8 =I~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~IS:3 ~ l~ ~ VI:! ~ ~ u 0
~~ ",' '"
..-
/.;l '" "'0 G~~~~~~~~~~88~s~tf8~~~~~~~~s cal\)~O .,,'"
0 o....'gu.. 0-
"" '" ~u <~~~~ u~_ ~~ = ~ ~~Q ~~ u..o ....O!u>< u::::
t""\
1"",\
1:'
~
"
'"
o
=
'"
~~
o
00
r-;!
"'0
8r.:;--~
~~8g~
.:: &; >.
U~h
<.Q.o[o.lU<
11l11logo
~i8~iJ
l1l>2:~~
"'1' - ~
o.
J
~~ggg
r~8~~
~-;g ~~
03- .....
~
~
00
~ g;o8g
~ 'i8~C1C
~ ~ ;..>:!:..~
S ~ jr ~
i: ~
~ 8
z N '"
~ f-<
<:.i
~
.. ~
~ rB~~8O
'" ~ <.; ~~
@ >OC"la
1;; <lM~
'" ij- ~
~
Q>
~o
....~
'. as
~~
z ~~~
=",,",
~ N 5", "'
~ $........
'" ~ 00 U~
... '" 0 ,-,,,,,,,
~ '" u
><
,:.c: 0 Z
~ '" ~ -8~~!
2 ~ =_ NO
U-_E-l
~
r,
]I#~.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen Plarming and Zoning Commission
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director~
Sarah Oates, Zoning Office~b
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision
8040 Greenline Review
DATE:
January 29, 2002
SUMMARY:
The applicant, Alain Degrave, represented by Bill Pollock of Zone 4 Architecture, has
applied for 8040 Greenline approval for an addition to the single family residence.
The applicant is proposing the addition of approximately 780 square feet of floor area.
The 8040 Greenline standards primarily concentrate on the effects of site grading, the
ability for the property to be served with utilities and fire prote(:tion, and the visual
effects of the resulting development on the mountain backdrop of the City. The
Community Development Department has received referral comments from all
relevant departments and those are reflected in Staff's analysis :md recommendation.
The applicant is also requesting a four (4) foot, six (6) inch variance from the height
requirement in the zone district, which is twenty-five (25) feet. The need for the
variance arose through a request from the Fire Department to provide for a forty-five
(45) foot turning radius for a fire truck turnaround. The actual height of the building
has not been altered from the original set of plans, but because the Fire Department
requested the garage be stepped back five (5) feet the grade from which the height is
measured has changed, creating a need for the variance. Currently, the road width
and turnaround area is inadequate and providing this turnaround will actually help
rectify a dangerous situation. The applicant has also been asked to mitigate the
problems of inadequate access for emergency vehicles by sprinkling at least a portion
of the building and adding fire detectors.
Staff recommends approval of the 8040 Greenline Review and the height
variance for the proposed addition at 200 Sesame Street, with conditions.
ApPLICANT:
Alain Degrave. Represented by Bill Pollock of Zone 4 Architecture.
LOCATION:
200 Sesame Street, Lot 5 Sunny Park North Subdivision.
I
"-.,,
, i
f''''
ZONING:
R-15 PUD.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
An administrative lot line adjustment was approved between Lot 5 and Lot 7
(accessed from above) in 1999.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
8040 Greenline Review. With a recommendation from the Planning Director, the
Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed development
based on the corresponding criteria.
Variance. With a recommendation from the Plarming Director, the Commission may
approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed development based on all three
corresponding criteria being met.
STAFF COMMENTS:
200 Sesame Street is the first of two houses located on a dead end street at the ,base of
Smuggler Mountain Road. The lot has steep slopes and the floor area has been
reduced due to the percentage of slopes over 20%. There is an existing single-family
house to the south and to the northeast, which is accessed off of a separate driveway
further up Smuggler Mountain Road. Sesame Street is a substandard street and the
Fire Department has requested several changes to the site plan to allow for emergency
access.
Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency
referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." The application has been
included as Exhibit "C."
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the 8040 Greenline Review and height variance for
200 Sesame Street, with the following conditions:
I. The Building Permit application shall include:
· A dust and noise mitigation plan.
· Slope stabilization analysis.
· Mudflowanalysis.
· Indemnification of rock fall areas.
· Avalanche Hazard study.
· Soil Hazard study.
· Drainage study and mitigation that detains rain and snowmelt run-off and is
routed on site. These facilities shall be shown on the drainage plan and approved
prior to the application for building permit.
2
^
1"''\
. }
· A tree removal permit from the City Parks Department for 1he removal or relocation
of trees as per Section 13.20.020 of the Code.
· Erosion control plan.
· Adequate landscape plan showing how erosion will be mitigated.
· A water tap permit for a tap sized for the required fire suppression systems (for
both the fire hydrant and suppression within the structure) and for the domestic
use.
· A tap permit from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District and all applicable
fees.
· A site plan showing the garage being set ten (10) feet back to accommodate a
forty-five (45) foot tuming radius.
2. The Site Improvement Survey submitted at the time of building permit submittal shall
include the following:
· All of the utilities shall be shown.
· The Surveyors Certificate needs to state the accuracy of the survey.
3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a sprinkler system and new fire
alarm system are required for the new portion of the structure.
4. Sesame Street shall not be narrowed in any way during construction and any
modifications to the road are to meet the City of Aspen's engineering standards.
5. Prior to the issuance ofa Certificate of Occupancy "No Parking" signs are to be put in
place at the entrance of the road so as the dissuade people from obstructing access to
Sesame Street.
6. Prior to building permit issuance a new service line shall be installed providing for
separate shutoff controls on each line and connecting to the new 12-inch water main
in Park Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence shall be re-tapped at
approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as existing.
The existing service connection to the 6-inch main located in Park Circle needs to be
abandoned at the corporation stop.
7. Prior to building permit submittal the applicant shall determine the location ofthe
service line from Lot 7, Sunny Park North to determine whether or not permanent
improvements such as the rock wall on the northwest corner will impact the
neighbor's sewer service line.
8. These conditions of approval shall be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit
set and all other drawing sets used for construction. The primary (:ontractor shall be
provided with a copy of this Resolution and shall submit a letter a.s part of the building
permit application stating that the conditions of approval have been read and
understood.
9. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public
meetings with the Plarming and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered
3
~
,
r)
conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. The applicant
shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the County Clerk and Recorder.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve the 8040 Greenline Review and a variance from the twenty-five
(25) foot height limit by four (4) feet and six (6) inches, for the expansion of the
single-family residence at 200 Sesame Street, with the conditions included in
Plarming and Zoning Commission Resolution 02-~'
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Comments
Exhibit B -- Referral Agency Comments
Exhibit C -- Development Application
d:\home\saraho\planning\esa\200sesame _MEMO.doc
4
^
rJ
Exhibit A
200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision
STAFF COMMENTS: 8040 Greenline Review
26.435.030(C) 8040 Greenline Review Standards. No development shall be permitted at,
above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 greenline unl<:ss the Plarming and
Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with
all requirements set forth below:
1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for
development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine
subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If
the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize
and revegelate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them 10 be removed from
the site to a location acceptable to the city.
Staff finding:
200 Sesame Street was developed in the late 1980s so the issue of suitability of the
development is not really applicable. No indications of problems rdated to the above
standard have been observed or noted.
The slope of this site does suggest that engineering considerations b'e incorporated into
the development plans to accommodate slope stability. Staff has inc!luded conditions
requiring the City Engineer be given information relating to mud flow, rock falls,
avalanche dangers and soil toxicity.
2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the
natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on
water pollution.
Staff finding:
Due to the steepness of the site, the development plans must incorporate adequate
drainage mitigation measures for both during and after construction. The City Engineer
has requested a drainage report and plan be submitted and approved prior to an
application for a building permit being accepted by the Building Department. Staff has
included the drainage requirement from the City Engineer as a recommended condition.
3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air
quality in the city.
Staff finding:
The development is not expected to have any affect on the area's air quality
4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible
with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be
located.
Staff finding:
As stated above, as development already exists on this parcel the design and location are
not an issue. The addition is compatible with the original development.
Staff Comments page 1
,I""',
r~
5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable. disturbance to the terrain,
vegetation and natural land fealures,
Staff finding:
The applicant is required to meet setback requirements for the zone district, therefore the
disturbance will be limited to those areas.
6. The placement and clustering of structures wiil minimize the need for roads, limit
culling and grading. maintain open space, and preserve, the mounlain as a scenic
resource.
Staff finding:
The site is too small to accomplish clustering. The access way serves two homes and
does represent an efficiency.
7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to
blend into the open character of the mountain.
Staff finding:
The building height and bulk are minimized and the addition is compatible with the
existing structure. The applicant is proposing an addition of approximately 780 square
feet for floor area.
8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed
development.
Staff finding:
The applicant will need to make changes to the existing water line to accommodate a fire
sprinkler system and satisfy the regulation of the City of Aspen Mlmicipal Code.
Conditions of approval have been included in the approvals to assure compliance.
9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed developmenl, and said roads
can be properly maintained.
10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to
ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment.
Staff finding:
The applicant has had to make some minor changes to the original proposal to assure
adequate access for fire protection. The proposed garage will be setback ten (10) feet to
provide for a forty-five (45) foot turning radius.
11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plein:
Parks/RecreationlTrails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to
the greatest extent practical.
Staff finding:
This parcel is not specified in the AACP: ParksIRecreationlTrails Plan.
STAFF COMMENTS: Variance
1. The grant of the variance will be generaily consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and this title.
Staff finding
Staff Comments page 2
r"\
r~
Granting the variance is consistent with the goals of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and the requirements of the Aspen Municipal Land Use Code. Life, health and safety
requirements are part of the Aspen Municipal Code.
2. The grant of the variance is lhe minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the parcel, building, or structure.
Staff finding:
The Fire Department and the applicant have agreed to the minimal allowable emergency
vehicle turnaround area and the variance will allow for reasonable use of the parcel
through improved access and safety.
3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this title
would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoYEld by other parcels in the
same zone district, and would cause the applicanl unnecessary hardship or
practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's right would be deprived,
the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply:
a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the
parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures
or buildings in the same zone districl and which do not result from the actions of
the applicant; or
b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege
denied by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan the terms of this title to other
parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district.
Staff finding:
There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to this parcel. Approval
was granted to 200 Sesame Street and the adjacent lot with substandard access to both
sites. This has created a life and safety hazard and the fire access turnaround will allow
the applicant and neighbor to enjoy rights that are commonly enjoyed by other parcels,
that of emergency vehicle access.
C:\home\saraho\planning\esa\200sesame _ EXa,doc
Staff Comments page 3
,...", a
Aspen Consolidated Sanitatio~ bistrict
, Sy Kelly' Chairman
Paul Smith' Treas
Michael Kelly' Secy
December 6,2001
John Keleher
Frank Loushin
Bruce Matherly, Mgr
Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer
130 S, Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: 200 Sesame Street
Dear Sarah:
The proposed developed lies within the service area of the Aspen Constllidated Sanitation District
and is currently served by the District. Service to the development proposed is contingent upon
compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications which are on file at the
District office. All fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The applicant should determine the location of the service line from Lot 7,0131 Smuggler
Mountain Road to determine whether or not permanent improvements such as the rock wall on
north west corner would impact the neighbor's sewer service line. All of the utiIiti"es should be
shown on a site improvement survey. A tap permit, which estimates fees, can be completed once
detailed plans are made available to our business office. All fees must be paid prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
Sincerely,
1--......... Y\A........I--~
Bruce Matherly ()
District Manager
565 N. Mill St.,Aspen, CO 81611 / (970)925-3601 / FAX (970) 925-2537
Stephen Ellsperman, 08:05 AM 11/12/01 -0700,200 Sesat1J.e St
I""'.
f"J,
t,..,. ..>,
;J
Page I of 1
X-Sender: stephene@commons
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:05:27 -0700
To: saraho@ci.aspen.co.us
From: Stephen Ellsperman <stephene@cLaspen.co.us>
Subject: 200 Sesame St
X-ECS-MaiIScanner: Found to be clean
The following are my comments for the 200 Sesame St. 8040 Greenline:
- An erosion control plan must be submitted as part of the buildin!~ application package.
This slope has highly erosive soils and is subject to erosion durin9 the construction
process.
- An adequate landscape plan must be submitted as part of the building application
package.
Stephen Ellsperman
Natural Resources and Construction Manager
(970)920-6010
Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us>
11112/01
,~,
~~
MEMORANDUM
To: Development Review Committee
From: Richard Goulding, Project Engineer
Reference DRC Caseload Coordinator
Date: November 27,2001
Re: 200 Sesame Street 8040 Greenline Review
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Innsbruck PUD at their
November 14 ,2001 meeting, and has compiled the following comments:
General
1. Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we
assume the submitted site plan is accurate, that it shows all site features, and
that proposed development is feasible. The wording must be carried forward
exactly as written unless prior consent is received from the Engineering
Department. This is to alleviate problems and delays related to approvals tied to
"issuance of building permit."
2. R.O.W. Impacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-of-way,
the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment
license requirements.
Site Review
1. Site Drainage - Requirement -. The foundation drainage system should be
separate from site storm drainage system. Rain and snow melt runoff must be
detained and routed on site. These facilities must be shown on drainage plans
and submitted for approval prior to application for building permit. The drainage
may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report
demonstrates that the percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design
storm
Information - The City drainage criteria needs to be implemented completely.
This includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabili,zation, and re-
vegetation in disturbed areas. Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the
drainage will flow
2. Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter - Requirement- sidewalk, curb, and gutter must be
designed using the City of Aspen design standards which al"e available in the
City Engineering Department.
3. Fire Protection District - Requirement-
Fire Protection District requests the following revisions be made:
,....."
/....\
I.' ,,',
Page 2 of 5
November 27,2001
200 Sesame Street
a. A sprinkler system and a new fire alarm system is required for the new
portion
b. To accommodate fire truck needs of a 45 feet turning radius, the garage is to
be pushed back 10 feet. This will be subject to approval by the planning and
zoning commission
c. The existing road (Sesame Street) is not be narrowed in any way
d. No parking signs are be put in place at the entrance to the road so as to
dissuade people from parking in a way that blocks the entrance to Sesame
Street
e. Clarify the Legal address of the Street
4. Transportation - Requirements- The information were forwarded by
Transportation department:
a. No Comment
5. Building Department - Requirements - The following requirements were
forwarded by the Building Department:
a. No comment
6. Parking - Requirement - The following requirement has been forwarded by the
Parking Department:
a. No comment
7. Engineering Department - Requirement- The following n3quirements have
been provided by the Engineering Department:
a. Improvement Survey
. The Surveyor Cert. needs to state the accuracy of the survey (1: 1 0000)
b. A dust and noise mitigation plan is to be submitted during construction
c. No construction materials are to be stored on the public ROW
d. The following studies are to be performed to comply witl1 26.435.030 C
. Slope Stabilization analysis
. Mudflow analysis
. Indemnification of rock fall areas
. Avalanche Hazard study
. Soil hazard study
. Drainage study and mitigation
e. The road is to meet the City of Aspen's engineering department standards
f. Water is have a minimum pressure of 40 p.s.i.
Page 30(5
November 27,2001
200 Sesame Street
~
ri
Information - The following information has been provideld by the Engineering
Department:
a. The submittal of the construction plans to Engineering Department for
reviews prior to application for building permit will benefit the developer and
will facilitate timely processing of the Building Permits.
8. Streets Department - Requirement- The following requirements have been
provided by the Streets department
a. No comment
9. Housing Office - Requirements - The following requirements have been
provided by the Housing Office:
a. No comment
10. Community Development - Requirements - The following requirements have
been provided by the Community Development Office:
a. Comments will follow
11. Emergency Management Disaster Coordinator - Requirement _ The
following requirement has been provided by the Pitkin County Disaster
Coordinator:
a. No comment at this time
12. City Environmental Health Director - Requirements- The following
requirements were made by the Environmental Health Director:
a. Will have to comply with institutional controls for any dirt moving on site.
13. Parks - Requirement- The following requirements have been made by the
Parks Department:
a. An erosion control plan must be submitted as part of the, building application
package. This slope has highly erosive soils and is subject to erosion during
the construction process.
b. An adequate landscape plan must be submitted as part of the building
application package.
~
r~
"
Page 4 of5
November 27,2001
200 Sesame Street
14. Utilities:
Water:
City Water Department - Requirement - As a request of the City of Aspen
Water Department, revisions need to be made as follows:
a. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System
standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water
Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code
b. I've reviewed the submittal for the above project. This residence currently
shares a 3/4 inch water service line with the adjoining property to the
North, Lot 1 Aspen Electric Subdivision. Common wate!r service lines are not
consistent with the Aspen Municipal Code, which requires a separate service
to each residence. In addition, the existing line may need to be upgraded to
accommodate a fire sprinkler system if the Fire Marshall requires such an
installation.
A new service line should be installed providing for separate shutoff
controls on each line and connecting to the newer 12 inch water main in Park
Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence should be re-tapped
at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as
existing. The existing service connection to the 6 inch main located in Park
Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop.
Wastewater:
Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Requirement - The following was
provided by the Aspen Consolidated Waste District:
a. In the construction of the rock wall on the north side of the property, care
should be given to locate and not interfere with the sanitary sewer service
that runs in the same general area to Park Ave. from the neighbors house to
the north, 0131 Smuggler Mt. Road.
Construction:
Work in the Public Right of Way
;^
,...",
t1
Page 5 of5
November 27,2001
200 Sesame Street
Requirement - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in pUblic rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the
applicant as follows:
Approvals
1. Engineering:
The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering
Department (920-5080) for design of improvements, including
grading, drainage, transportationlstreets, landscaping, and
encroachments within public right of way.
2. Parks:
The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920-
5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance.
3. Streets:
The applicant receives approval from the Streets department
(920-5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on
streets, and alleyways.
4. Permits:
Obtain R.O.W. permits for any work or development, involving
street cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department
ORe Attendees
Staff: Sarah Oats
Richard Goulding
Nick Adeh
Ed Van Walraven
Mark 0' Meara
Applicant's Representative: Bill Pollock
In
:'}
I""\~
L>r
Page I of I
To: saraho@cLaspen.co.us
Subject: Review Comments--200 Sesame St Remodel
Cc: edv@cLaspen.co.us, nealg@cLaspen.co.us
Sarah,
I've reviewed the submittal for the above project. This residence currently
shares a 3/4 inch water service line with the adjoining property to the
North, Lot 1 Aspen Electric Subdivision. Common water service lines are not
consistent with the Aspen Municipal Code, which requires a separate service
to each residence. In addition, the existing line may need to be upgraded to
accomodate a fire sprinkler system if the Fire Marshall requires such an
installation.
A new service line should be installed providing for separate shutoff
controls on each line and connecting to the newer 12 inch water main in Park
Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence should be re-tapped
at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as
existing. The existing service connection to the 6 inch main located in Park
Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment.
Phil Overeynder
Utility Director
x5111
Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us>
] 1/5101
Lee Cassin, 02:43 PM 1111101 -0700, Re: 200 Sesame
,r.,
r~
Page I of I
X-Sender: leec@comdev.cLaspen.co.us
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:43:41 ~0700
To: Sarah Oates <saraho@cLaspen.co.us>
From: Lee Cassin <leec@cLaspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: 200 Sesame
Sarah,
Not for a planning application, unless you want to let them know they'll have to comply with
institutional controls for any dirt moving on site.
Thanks, Lee
At 03:00 PM 11/1/01 -0700, you wrote:
Lee--
We have a planning application in for an addition to a house at 200 Sesame Street--does
something special need to happen if it is part of the Smuggler Superfund site? just let me
know.
Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
(970) 920-5441
Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us>
1111101
f"'"\
1"',,\
AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
-z.. <:> 0
S€S"I/Vl.o~ .:;.T.
~"'N 1..<t-f1:!
, Aspen, CO
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
,200-=
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
!, IN ll.-l.-I~"""" ~l.-L..I>c..~ (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personaUy
certify that! have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the foUowing manner:
- Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section ofan official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
-*- Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtai. (.
Community Development Department, which was made of~ . e,.",,~-:,o
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two.'iil,'inches wide-;;>-
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was compose~ oflettei'S'rii:iliT ~
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at le~rr:en (lU)'ddys^! I",
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible ft5!A'Cl1e day of~;:'
,200_, to and including the date anlii~le,Oftl1e;: Plfbi1~
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attachedl1erit/e:" ".;';''''
L Mailing of notice. By the mailing ofa notice obtained from th,e Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the
public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by tirst class, postage prepaid
U.S. mail to aU owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property
subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days priortothe
public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid
U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school,
service' district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns
property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject: to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shaU be
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date of the Pllblic hearing. A copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
o
t'i
I
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the of~cial zoni~g district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
slifficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
Cf,.J ---
Signature
A
-rt.~
The foregoing "Aftidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this l q day
of .J(JvYClA.O--rJ ,200Z-,by Wi\\i(.!....VV\ S Y"IL:;;:L
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
~~ ~OldOC6
-~
ATTACHMENTS:
COpy OF THE PUBLICATION
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNi'rIENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
B fl'vL4.IL
I
I ~
,
AGLEY JOSEPH A
424PARKCIR#TH5
ASPEN, CO 81611
\
j
BENTLEY CARL F
427PARKCIR
ASPEN, CO 81611
BOYD JEFFREY R
PO BOX 8361
ASPEN, CO 81612
BUREK DEBORAH J
1'0 BOX 812
ASPEN, CO 81612
CHAUNER RONALD M & JACKIE L
SHEFFER
PO BOX 8782
ASPEN, CO 81612
,
I
}
COOKMAN WILLIAM THOMAS
508 PARK CIR
ASPEN, CO 8161 I
DAY ISABEL T & ESTER T
120 TURTI..E COVE
ASPEN, CO 81611-961O
DODINGTON SUSAN M
221 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611
FISHER CONSTANCE A
330ANAYARANCHRD
GALISTEO, NM 87540
FON SARA B
""101 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611
r)
r~
ANSON DAVID G
1120 OAK ST - PAT 5
NAPA, cA 94559-3341
BERNARD RANDY
100 HARKNESS RD
PELHAM, MA 01002-9776
BRAINARD LOUISE
PO BOX 11354
ASPEN, CO 81612
CALK LAURA E '
WILLCOX DENNIS AS JOINT TENANTS
722 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611-2472
CITY OF ASPEN
130 S GALENA ST
! ASPEN, CO 81611
CUNNJNGHAM CAITI.. YN E
425 PARK CIR #Al
ASPEN, CO 81611
DEGRAEVE ALAIN
PO BOX 7975
ASPEN, CO 81612
EPLER ANDI E
PO BOX 785
ASPEN, CO 81612
FORNELL PETER J
402 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611
GLOOR JOHN L
500 PARK CIR
ASPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING
AUTHORITY
530 E MAIN ST #001
ASPEN, CO 81611
BIRACH KAREN
122 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611-2414
BRlGHT GALEN
PO BOX 1848
ASPEN, CO 81612
CARSON BARBARA
PO BOX 10298
ASPEN, CO 81612
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS MEDIA
500 DOUBLE EAGLE CT
WASHOE,}fV 89511
CUNNINGHAM PAMELA M
502 MIDLAND PK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611
DICKENSON GWEN F
312 E HYMAN AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
ETTLINGER JAREDP WI GODWIN
PO BOX 10936
ASPEN, CO 81612
FUENTES DAVID & KATHARINE D
302 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611
GRIFFITHS THOMAS W
504 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 8f611
HAGEN CATHERINE ANNE
210 MIDLAND PARK PL B-lO
ASPEN, CO 81611
HIGHT NEIL C & SEWELL KATHRYN
520 E COOPER AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
JOHNSON SHAEL UND 80% !NT
PO BOX 3549
ASPEN, CO 81612
KOLBERG JUDITH A
501 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611
MAC CRACKEN SCOTT R & MARlSA POST
PO BOX 10821
ASPEN, CO 81612
)
MORK HALBERT L FAMILY TRUST
77 ASPEN WAY
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
NEW STEPHEN E & KORl A IT
821 MlDLANDPARKPL
ASPEN, CO 81611
PAULIDES BROOKE A
PO BOX 11 023
ASPEN, CO 81612
PERSIKO DEBORAH & FREDERICK IT
TENANTS
710 MlDLAN PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611
jl'ER JEANNE MARIE
". [MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611
r-..
HECK JAMES C
PO BOX 8416
ASPEN, CO 81612
HOUBEN CYNTHIA MICHELE
PO BOX 9616
ASPEN, CO 81612
KARAUS LINDA MARIE & GREGORY
DONALD
510PARKCIR
ASPEN, CO 81611
KRIEBEL KATHLEEN
PO BOX 910
ASPEN, CO 81612
MCPHEE JAMES MICHAEL
401 MlDLANDPARKPL
· ASPEN, CO 81611
MOYER MARY
424PARKCIR#6
ASPEN, CO 81611
NICHOLS SCOTT A
PO BOX 3035
ASPEN, CO 81612
PAULIDES HERBERT B & CAROLYN F
160 CONCORD RD
LONGMEADOW, MA 01106
PIERCE ROBERT KING
PO BOX 3118
ASPEN, CO 81612
ROSEN JANE
PO BOX 9853
ASPEN, CO 81612
r'i
I HIGGINS PAUL
303 MIDLAND PARK PL #C-3
ASPEN, CO 81611
HUA VlNH
PO BOX 8513
ASPEN, CO 81612
KOCH KATHRYN S & JOHN F
304 MIDLAND PARK PL C-4
ASPEN, CO 81611
LUU TONG KHON
435 E MAIN ST
, ASPEN, CO 81611
MERZBACH NINA
PO BOX 3465
ASPEN, CO 81612
NARAT BENJAPORN
FLAT922REDLIONST
LONDON WCIR4PS, UK
PATfEN DAVIDN
810 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611
PENDLETON MARGOT ROSE
424 PARK CIR TH-3
ASPEN, CO 81611
PITKIN COUNTY
530 E MAIN ST STE 302
ASPEN, CO 81611
ROSS MATTHEW N
212 MIDLAND PARK PLACE
ASPEN, co" 81611
,
i
/"
, ,
ROWARS CHARLES M
4990 SW 52ND STE 20 I
DAYlE, FL 33314
SMISEK LINDA L E
429 PARK CIR C-3
ASPEN, CO 81611
SPECK KIM JENNIFER
PO BOX 9912
ASPEN, CO 81612
, SULLIVAN ANNE T & COLSON JOHN D
ASPEN TIMES CIO
, PO BOXE
ASPEN, CO 81612
WALDRON K BRENT
COATES REID & WALDRON C/O
720 E HYMAN A VB
ASPEN, CO 81611
)
WELLS JOSEPH EDW AJU)
602 MIDLAND PARK PL F-2
ASPEN, CO 81611
r')
SALTONST AIL ANDREW C
PO BOX 9802
ASPEN, CO 81612
SMITH KATHLEEN M
1023 WILLITS LN
BASALT, CO 81621
SPONAR ANTON K AND JUDY
222 MIDLAND PARK PL
ASPEN, CO 81611-2486
VALLEY DOUGLAS J
III MIDLAND PARK PL #AII
ASPEN, CO 81611-2413
WEBSTER DAVID H
, PO BOX 10362
I ASPEN, CO 81612
WILSON FREDRICK C
100 S SPRING ST STE 2
ASPEN, CO 81611-2067
,
! i
r~
, SIEGEL BARRY & SHARON L
210 SESAME ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
SMUGGLER RACQUET CLUB
CIO SUE COOK
PO BOX 8788
ASPEN, CO 81612
STRAUB GRETCHEN A
BESTlC JEFFREY B
PO BOX 2267
ASPEN, CO 81612
WAGARRICHARDH
601 EHYMANAVB
ASPEN, CO 81611
WELDEN TODD E & DEBORAH C
503 MIDLAND PARK PL #E3
ASPEN, CO 81611
r"\
r~
.,:.,...,.:.J
"-'
"ROHITEOTUI'lE
I ~, Q.
p~ .70.~"4 .8041
JO .70,5.4.488'
Date: IlZ'; 1-
To: ",?,A/4"t\. C\4~
Fax: "l'1.0. "4'"$ ~
From: 'E>'("{" fou..oc..t:....
Paj\\lS; _ .? (1n<:luding cover sheet)
Re:
..J~~eve. fir v' ^l2-I"N~C
"--'
Colllments:
"-'
Signed:
N;z..,~IfIx-blook.""
III
f\
()
\....
Summarv
An addition to an existing home has been designed to step down the sloping site.
The lowest level of this addition consists of a garage. The face of the garage was
8' in front of the ,two floors a~ove it. However during a preliminary meeting for an
8040 Greenllne Review the Fire Marshall requested a fire truck turn-around. It
was agreed that by pushing the garage back Into the hili, urrtlllt is flush with the
floors above, the "tum-around" space would be created. By dolng this the height
limit was exceeded by approximately 4'--6". Although the original design'. height
has not changed, the grade from which it is calculated has.CSee attaQhed
drawings)
Resoon~s to the "Standards aoolicable to variances.
A.
2.
1. The encroachment of the height limit is "consistent with the
purposes IiInd goals, objectlves and policies of the Aspen
Community Plan". This variance is in response to these "goals and
objectives., particularly the goals of fire safety.
The variance Is for a minimum amount of helghll needed for
approval. As stated in the summary the height of the original design
has not changed.
~.
38. The height encroachment has been caused by l~reatlng a lire truck
tum-around. By adhering to one policy the parcel is not consistent
with another. Creating enough level grade to accommodate a ,fire
truck tum-around space on this sloping site with an existing
residence is cause to define the parcel the as h.lving .special
conditions and Circumstances..
3b. The granting of the variance will not bestow any special privileges
denied to other parcels. In fact, the space for the fire truCk turn-
around will also the serve the neighboring parcel.
B.
1. See attached
2. To deny the applicant a variance would be to deiPrlve the applicant
of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in tlhe same zone
district.
"-
r\
(""\
\.,..,
3. Construction s~ging shall be undertaken in such a manner so 8S to
minimize any neighborhood disruption.
4. Not applicable
5. Not Applicable
'-'
'--
1""'\
\...,,-
'-
!of..."
-to-..
~ ........
~
,
~
'-.,.,
j
r\
i
~l:.
~:.'.
::s "
1iiI1,.
:::-
ii
-
o
ARCHITECTURE
INC.
P.O. BOX 21508
ASPEN CO 81612
970.1544.g041
r"\.
r"\.
:1
TRANSMITTAL
To:
Date:
Sent Via:
Copies To:
Attached:
Comments:
\,
~A\2-Nf lYAfM
II % 10'2-
tlHlVl4
From: "t1(...L f>bL./.-l>(-f---
Project: D 1:'''' ("l-./\ ~ V ~
1-fT. VA 'jZ-{ AN{k
,
'f-c7(l- 1/ f:b rz-A t:Vl:~:--
aN -- ~,>>~k"'i~.!''I}E[)
;;:'\.~\J$..'l;oi:\l'll
Signed:
C:\Zone 4\genera1\forms\l:ransmittal.dot
1/1
...,." .
V J L.oL
/.$'iON I ?1'(i<~IN .
ro'." INIIY OE\jELO?i,\E~
,; M!'.IU
f)
1""\
j
AROHITEOTURE
INC.
P.O. BOX 2508
ASPEN 0081612
~70.544.9041
To: Sarah Oates - City of Aspen Zoning Officer
RE: Height Variance for the Degraeve Residence
Lot 5 Sunny Park North Subdivision
200 Sesame St.
Aspen, Co
Summary
An addition to an existing home has been designed to step down the sloping site.
The lowest level of this addition consists of a garage. The face of the garage was
8' in front of the two floors above it. However during a preliminary meeting for an
8040 Greenline Review the Fire Marshall requested a fire truck turn-around. It
was agreed that by pushing the garage back into the hill, until it is flush with the
floors above, the "turn-around" space would be created. By doing this the height
limit was exceeded by approximately 4'-6". Although the original design's height
has not changed, the grade from which it is calculated has.(See attached
drawings)
Responses to the "Standards applicable to variances"
A.
1. The encroachment of the height limit is "consistent with the
purposes and goals, objectives and policies of the Aspen
Community Plan". This variance is in response' to these "goals and
objectives", particularly the goals of fire safety.
ro
ti
2. The variance is for a minimum amount of height needed for
approval. As stated in the summary the height of the original design
has not changed.
3a. The height encroachment has been caused by creating a fire truck
turn-around. By adhering to one policy the parcel is not consistent
with another. Creating enough level grade to accommodate a fire
truck turn-around space on this sloping site with an existing
residence is cause to define the parcel the as having "special
conditions and circumstances".
3b. The granting of the variance will not bestow any special privileges
denied to other parcels. In fact, the space for the fire truck turn-
around will also the serve the neighboring parcel.
B. Not Applicable
William S. Pollock
Representative to Mr. Degraeve
I""'i
r'\,
)
I
I
I z
I I 0
-
I E-<
I <'
:>';'
I I I I"l:'"
I ....:l "
I ~:.
I "-
I E-t-==
I (:I)"'
I I"l:;l
l=1l5
I I
......
-.1
.eo.",
.~.....
s g
s ,
N
"'z
"0
b:l
;:....;
,==
...
II~ t;l;:!
~. t'"
't'J
c:;<
~
-
o
Z
f'>"
i"""'\
r .~
~"
:;
<
~.
~
~~p
.0
;R
.
~
--,
r--- I
1 I
I 1
1 I
I 1
I I
I I
1 I
I 1
I _
-I I
I 1
1 I
I 1
1 I
1
I I 1
I --~ I
i-T I 1
I nil I
1 ,$ ~ 1 I
~~ m I
j "'r ~
I ~~ ~ I
1 .~ ~ I
I ~ ~ 1
I ~ I
1 g I
I ~ I
"
1 I
I I
I
I
I
1
I
I
~
~
.
>
o
~
~
,
.
o
,
"
,
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
J I I
------ J I I
----- ~1_-1
~
~
.
R
>
~
~
.
I
"
~
,
.
~
.
o
.
.
~
.
r
.
.
:;:
,
~
~
.
x
~
~
.
~
~
~ /
~ /
" /
~/
/
i
J'.
~
::x:.
r",
,-,
-
"
,
""""
'...... ;\
1\
Ii";
I i~
i!
!
I it 4
~.!,I~
I ;-.,;
i i
iv\
, ~ ~
Ii ii
, 'l
' ,
, I
i I
r\
r,
October 24, 2001
Community Development
City of Aspen
130 South Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
To The Community Development Dept. of Aspen,
William Pollock of Zone 4 Architecture, Inc. (license # B-3329) will act on my behalf for
the 8040 GreenJine Review. For contact information refer to the fbllowing:
William Pollock
Zone 4 Architecture, Inc.
P.O. Box 2508
Aspen, CO 81612
P 544-9041
F 544-4885
Al . Degraeve
200 Sesame St.
Aspen, CO 81611
P 544-01 II
r"\.
r,,!
I
October 24, 2001
Community Development
City of Aspen
130 South Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
To The Community Development Dept. of Aspen,
A. Development description:
The new development consists of a three level addition to a six (occurring at
halflevels) level home. The addition will include a bedroom, bathroom,
master bathroom, wine room, laundry room mechanical room, garage, and
storage area. A patio area with spa is located between the existing home and
the proposed addition. The addition is to be located on the north side of the
existing home.
The new addition will be of typical wood frame construction with stone and
wood siding. The roof material will be bronzed (dark matte finish) copper.
The existing roof will be re-roofed to match.
B. The following are the responses to the 8040 Greenline Review Standards:
1. A three bedroom residence now exists on the parcel on which the proposed
development, an addition to the existing home, is to be located. To my
knowledge the construction history of the original home did not reveal any .
hazardous or toxic soils. There also exists an access road and home up-slope
(within 50' -0") from the proposed addition. The neighboring homes'
proximity will help reduce greatly if not eliminate any rock fall or avalanche
danger. The applicant shall re-vegetate, where necessary, to stabilize soils.
2. The proposed addition will not have a significant adverse affect on the natural
watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water
pollution. As stated above the location of the home up-slope shields the
proposed addition from any significant watershed, etc. to begin with.
3. Not applicable
('j
t""\
.,
2
4. The new development is compatible with the terrain because it is not
significantly changing the grading adjacent to it.
5. Grading has only been changed two areas which access the exterior, the
bedroom and garage. Besides the entry wall to the bedroom and garage entry
wall, natural grade will be maintained within 24" of original elevation.
6. The proposed addition has been located such that the garage is in close
proximity to the access road. The garage is also located under a second level
thus reducing grading and maintaining more open space.
7. The two upper levels facing the street are set back from the fu~ade of the
garage to minimize the mass and building height of the three levels. By
stepping the upper levels back from the garage the structure also blends in
with the "mountain character" by following the slope of the site.
8. All utilities presently exist at the site. The existing home is currently
connected to the City of Aspen water and sewer systerr" The proposed
addition should not add any significant amount of water pressure.
9. Adequate roads to serve the development already exist and have been (and
will be) properly maintained.
10. The ingress and egress of the existing access road is not being affected by the
addition. The existing access road will remain "as is".
11. Not applicable - No trails designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
exist on the site
William Pollock
Zone 4 Architecture, Inc.
~
(L
<(
1"5:2
D.-
Vl
<)-
g,1-'
?:z
0-
U
>
~
::)
B
~
~
~
1)
~
~
,...
:.l
~
'"
~
~
I)
~
~"
RED MOUNTAIN
ROAD
o
~
~
w
~
(?j
'"
a:>
~.
,
z<
"'''l
~'"
~:z<
D.-=>_
VlO",
<:::;;Vl
(
I
1
~~
..,
2:
j!
;r
" ,
,
1
L
,
I
i"
I
1
!
J ;;ZZ
'< o~
BU)5z
..J~..uoc(
,.~>-;;
z ;;Z
<l:::::<W
'l.aJQ:);.- 2i
O~'<:::E
ffi ==0 .
~z~w~
::f~4Z0w
8"=~~f5
1-~'=l:::E:t:
CIJ>:C):::E
:)~Z!8i
:::EQ:42:' 0
5~'-~~
>-rn..,.:..:>-z
-CJ!l!o
~F:~a:i=
::z1.1::l..l~<
o-c:t 2
c....:J:l:(f)!:!:
:5~O(.;J5:t:
o :=1......10.1
..J <.cn::z;o
oOctr_1.&..
o~~.....o
02:00
....<C,.;;l~~
O:Z:~WOC(
2:0000
~~~~~
ooC!:!::4I(.....
oliJ~::ii!::::E
5i~=>~o
1D~~1f
tl~f~;H3~
I=I=~(IJ<
~~~~~
t
f
I
!.~
i'
;
I
,
i
i
!
\.,
I
,I't
~i
~;:
"
II If
~i'
"
/
/
/
/
!
f"'l
t"'\
iJ
ARCHITEOTURE
INC.
P.O. BOX 2508
ASPEN CO 81612
~70.544.9041
To: Sarah Oates - City of Aspen Zoning Officer
RE: Height Variance for the Degraeve Residence
Lot 5 Sunny Park North Subdivision
200 Sesame St.
Aspen, Co
Summary
An addition to an existing home has been designed to step down the sloping site.
The lowest level of this addition consists of a garage. The face of the garage was
8' in front of the two floors abov~ it. However during a preliminary meeting for an
8040 Greenline Review the Fire Marshall requested a fire truck turn-around. It
was agreed that by pushing the garage back into the hill, until it is flush with the
floors above, the "turn-around" space would be created. By doing this the height
limit was exceeded by approximately 4'-6". Although the original design's height
has not changed, the grade from which it is calculated has.(Slee attached
drawings)
Responses to the "Standards applicable to variances"
A.
1. The encroachment of the height limit is "consiste~nt with the
purposes and goals, objectives and policies of the Aspen
Community Plan". This variance is in response tlJ these "goals and
objectives", particularly the goals of fire safety.
~
r"
~../
2. The variance is for a minimum amount of height needed for
approval. As stated in the summary the height of the original design
has not changed.
3a. The height encroachment has been caused by creating a fire truck
turn-around. By adhering to one policy the parcel is not consistent
with another. Creating enough level grade to accommodate a fire
truck turn-around space on this sloping site with an existing
residence is cause to define the parcel the as having "special
conditions and circumstances".
3b. The granting of the variance will not bestow any special privileges
denied to other parcels. In fact, the space for the fire truck turn-
around will also the serve the neighboring parcel.
B. Not Applicable
William S. Pollock
Representative to Mr. Degraeve
~
I
)
..1
.f<....
.140.'"
ti
r"'"'i
~ . 1
Z;
o
-
.....
<t:.
>1'
"':...
....:l "
",;"
"-
~::
UJ~
~tj
Ot:rn
.....
;
~ "
t"\
f 1""
< f
I ~ :;'
. ,<
) ~ ~.
~
r..-.-
I 1-.-
l\:) I
~z I I
1=0 I I
~~ I I
-...;j
-:.:= I I
it::!
-t"' I I
bt"l
,< I I
~ ,---- I I
-
0 I I I
z
I I I-
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
-
I -~---.J I
I I c
to "'11 r-. I z
~~ Z m
I 7\::S; m I I ~
I ~E ~ ,;
0" m I I ~
H x
) I ~ I I m
m~ ~ X
I I "
~ I ~
I ~ 0 I 0
m ~
I . I
m ~
I ~ I E
0
I 0 0
~ I G /
I ~ I ~
I I \// /
I /
I I
/1 I I /
I I
I I I
I I I ~
"1 I I
- - ~
- -___J I I > i
- --__J I 0
I ~
.
~1_-1 . "
,;
~ .
~
~ m ,
~ , ~
. ~
~ 0
~ JI
i ~ 0 ~
m
~
0
i .:t:.
m
r".
r,
.
.'
'/;;~\
~./,; \
/',-'1"
-~"...
,
I 1\
/-:..
; ~ ~
l"t
i
i ilO
~! ~
i -i ~
j
I""
r~
r i
!~i f
!~Il
,~ r,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASE #A102-01
Before the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE
DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the
BASEMENT MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority
for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons
affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
carmot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you
have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions
of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for
variance.
Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows:
Date and Time of Meeting:
Date: January 29, 2002
Time: 4:30P.M.
Owner for Variance:
Representative for Variance:
Name:
Alain Degraeve
Bill Pollock
Zone 4 Architecture
P.O. Box 2508
Aspen, CO 81612
Address:
200 Sesame Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Location or description of property:
. 200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North
Variances Requested:
The applicant is requesting a variance offour (4) feet and six (6) inches from the twenty-five (25) foot
height requirement to provide for a fire truck turnaround.
Will applicant be represented by Counsel: YES: NO: X
The City of Aspen Plarming and Zoning Commission
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Jasmine Tygre, Chairman
t) " . r~
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District.' '
, Sy Kelly' Chairman
p~ul Smith' Treas
Michael Kelly * Secy
Deceipber 6, 200 I
. John Kejeh~r
, Frank Loushin
BruceMath~rly, Mgr
Sarah Oates, Zoning Offic,er
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: 200 Sesame Street
Dear Sarah:
^ : ..: ..','"
The proposed developed lies Within thy service area of the A.spen ConsQlidated Sanitation District
and is currently served by the District. Service to thy development proposed is continpent upon '
compliance with the District's rules, regulations, ardspecifications whic:h are on file at the
Districioffice. All fees 1llust be paid prior to the issuance ofa building pennit. '
, -..', ..' .,......." .. "
The applicant should detennine the loqation of the, service linefroip Lot 7,0131 Smuggler
Mountain ~oad todetermine whether or not permanent improvements such as the rock wall on
north west comer would impact the neighbor's,sewerservice line. i\llofthe utilities should be
shown on a site improvement survey. A tap permit, which estimates fees:, can be completed once
detailed plans are made available to our business office. All fees must be paid prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
Sinqerely,
~<-<..- ~.....,l,..~
Bruce Matherly " 0
District Manager
565 N. Mill St.,Aspen, CO 81611 / (970)925-3601 / FAX (970) 925-2537
'," .. :. ,.. ..,', .
I
!
Stephen Ellsperman, 08:05 AM 11112/01 -0700,200 Sesame St
~
r~
Page 1 of I
X-Sender: stephene@commons
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:05:27 -0700
To: saraho@cLaspen.co.us
From: Stephen Ellsperman <stephene@ci.aspen.co,us>
Subject: 200 Sesame St
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
The following are my comments for the 200 Sesame St. 8040 Greenline:
- An erosion control plan must be submitted as part of the buildingl application package.
This slope has highly erosive soils and is subject to erosion durin~, the construction
process.
- An adequate landscape plan must be submitted as part of the building application
package.
Stephen Ellsperman
Natural Resources and Construction Manager
(970)920-6010
.1;
,
Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us>
11/12/01
/"""'I
r,
MEMORANDUM
To: Development Review Committee
From: Richard Goulding, Project Engineer
Reference DRe Case load Coordinator
Date: November 27,2001
Re: 200 Sesame Street 8040 Greenline Review
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Innsbruck PUD at their
November 14 ,2001 meeting, and has compiled the following comments:
General
1. Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we
assume the submitted site plan is accurate, that it shows all site features, and
that proposed development is feasible. The wording must be carried forward
exactly as written unless prior consent is received from the Engineering
Department. This is to alleviate problems and delays relatled to approvals tied to
"issuance of building permit."
2. R.O.W. Impacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-of-way,
the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment
license requirements.
Site Review
1. Site Drainage - Requirement -.The foundation drainage system should be
separate from site storm drainage system. Rain and snow melt runoff must be
detained and routed on site. These facilities must be shown on drainage plans
and submitted for approval prior to application for building permit. The drainage
may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report
demonstrates that the percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design
storm
Information - The City drainage criteria needs to be implemented completely.
This includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabilization, and re-
vegetation in disturbed areas. Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the
drainage will flow
2. Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter - Requirement- sidewalk, curb, and gutter must be
designed using the City of Aspen design standards which are available in the
City Engineering Department.
3. Fire Protection District -Requirement-
Fire Protection District requests the fgllowing revisions be lTIade:
Page 2 of 5
November 27,2001
200 Sesame Street
r'\
I
,.,~
, ...1.~
a. A sprinkler system and a new fire alarm system is required for the new
portion
b. To accommodate fire truck needs of a 45 feet turning radius, the garage is to
be pushed back 10 feet. This will be subject to approval by the planning and
zoning commission
c. The existing road (Sesame Street) is not be narrowed in any way
d. No parking signs are be put in place at the entrance to the road so as to
dissuade people from parking in a way that blocks the entrance to Sesame
Street
e. Clarify the Legal address of the Street
4. Transportation - Requirements- The information were forwarded by
Transportation department:
a. No Comment
5. Building Department - Requirements - The following requirements were
forwarded by the Building Department:
a. No comment
6. Parking - Requirement ~ The following requirement has been forwarded by the
Parking Department:
a. No comment
7. Engineering Department - Requirement- The following requirements have
been provided by the Engineering Department:
a. Improvement Survey
. The Surveyor Cert. needs to state the accuracy of the survey (1: 1 0000)
b. A dust and noise mitigation plan is to be submitted during construction
c. No construction materials are to be stored on the public ROW
d. The following studies are to be performed to comply with 26.435.030 C
. Slope Stabilization analysis
. Mudflow analysis
. Indemnification of rock fall areas
. Avalanche Hazard study
. Soil hazard study
. Drainage study and mitigation
e. The road is to meet the City of Aspen's engineering department standards
f. Water is have a minimum pressure of 40 p.s.i.
Page 3 of5
November 27,2001
200 Sesame Street
r-,
.'
()
Information - The following information has been provided by the Engineering
Department:
a. The submittal of the construction plans to Engineering Department for
reviews prior to application for building permit will benl~fit the developer and
will facilitate timely processing of the Building Permits.
8. Streets Department - Requirement- The following requil"ements have been
provided by the Streets department
a. No comment
9. Housing Office - Requirements - The following requirements have been
provided by the Housing Office:
a. No comment
10. Community Development - Requirements - The following requirements have
been provided by the Community Development Office:
a. Comments will follow
11. Emergency Management Disaster Coordinator - Requirement _ The
following requirement has been provided by the Pitkin County Disaster
Coordinator:
a. No comment at this time
12. City Environmental Health Director - Requirements- The following
requirements were made by the Environmental Health Director:
a. Will have to comply with institutional controls for any dirt moving on site.
13. Parks - Requirement- The following requirements have be,en made by the
Parks Department:
a. An erosion control plan must be submitted as part of the, building application
package. This slope has highly erosive soils and is subject to erosion during
the construction process.
b. An adequate landscape plan must be submitted as part of the building
application package.
Page 4 of 5
November 27,2001
200 Sesame Street
,-,
,
(")
14. Utilities:
Water:
City Water Department - Requirement - As a request of the City of Aspen
Water Department, revisions need to be made as follows:
a. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System
standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water
Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code
b. I've reviewed the submittal for the above project. This residence currently
shares a 3/4 inch water service line with the adjoining property to the
North, Lot 1 Aspen Electric Subdivision. Common water service lines are not
consistent with the Aspen Municipal Code, which requires a separate service
to each residence. In addition, the existing line may need to be upgraded to
accommodate a fire sprinkler system if the Fire Marshall requires such an
installation.
A new service line should be installed providing for separate shutoff
controls on each line and connecting to the newer 12 inch water main in Park
Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence should be re-tapped
at approximately the same location providing for the same size of service as
existing. The existing service connection to the 6 inch main located in Park
Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop.
Wastewater:
Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Requirement - The following was
provided by the Aspen Consolidated Waste District:
a. In the construction of the rock wall on the north side of the property, care
should be given to locate and not interfere with the sanillary sewer service
that runs in the same general area to Park Ave. from thE, neighbors house to
the north, 0131 Smuggler Mt. Road.
Construction:
Work in the Public Right of Way
Page 5 of5
November 27,2001
200 Sesame Street
Requirement - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the
applicant as follows:
f"""1
1"")
Approvals
1. Engineering:
The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering
Department (920-5080) for design of improvements, including
grading, drainage, transportationlstreets, landscaping, and
encroachments within public right of way.
2. Parks:
The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920-
5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance.
3. Streets:
The applicant receives approval from the Streets department
(920-5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on
streets, and alleyways.
Obtain R.O.W. permits for any work or development, involving
street cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department
4. Permits:
DRC Attendees
Staff: Sarah Oats
Richard Goulding
Nick Adeh
Ed Van Walraven
Mark 0' Meara
Applicant's Representative: Bill Pollock
In
1"""\
r)
To: saraho@cLaspen.co.us
Subject: Review Comments--200 Sesame St Remodel
Cc: edv@cLaspen.co.us, nealg@cLaspen.co.us
Sarah,
I've reviewed the submittal for the above project. This residence currently
shares a 3/4 inch water service line with the adjoining property to the
North, Lot 1 Aspen Electric Subdivision. Common water service li'nes are not
consistent with the Aspen MunicipO\I Code, which requires a separate service
to each residence. In addition, the existing line may need to be upgraded to
accomodate a fire sprinkler system if the Fire Marshall requires such an
installation.
A new service line should be installed providing for separate shutoff
controls on each line and connecting to the newer 12 inch water main in Park
Circle. The existing service to the adjoining residence should be re-tapped
at approXimately the same location providing for the same size of service as
existing. The existing service connection to the 6 inch main locatE!d in Park
Circle needs to be abandoned at the corporation stop.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment.
Phil Overeynder
Utility Director
x5111
Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us>
Page I of1
11/S/01
Lee Cassin, 02:43 PM I I1I101 -0700, Re: 200 Sesame
r"\.
(",
Page I of 1
X-Sender: leec@comdev.cLaspen.co.us
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:43:41 -0700
To: Sarah Oates <saraho@cLaspen.co.us>
From: Lee Cassin <leec@cLaspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: 200 Sesame
Sarah,
Not for a planning application, unless you want to let them know they'll have to comply with
institutional controls for any dirt moving on site.
Thanks, Lee
At 03:00 PM 11/1/01 -0700, you wrote:
Lee--
We have a planning application in for an addition to a house at 2:00 Sesame Street--does
something special need to happen if it is part of the Smuggler Superfund site? just let me
know.
Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
(970) 920-5441
Printed for Sarah Oates <saraho@ci.aspen.co.us>
1 I1I10 I
"
, , ~...
~
1""\
f'"')
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
FROM:
Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer Sl?
RE:
Degraeve Residence, 200 Sesame Street, 8040 Greenline Exemption
DATE:
January 4, 2002
SUMMARY:
Alain Degraeve, owner, has applied for an administrative exemption from the 8040
Greenline Review to enclose a deck and add a dormer that will result in a 68 square foot
increase in floor area. The deck is located the southern side ofthe second floor and there
will be no change to the building footprint.
The applicant has applied for a 8040 Greenline Review for a more significant addition on
the north side of the residence, which is scheduled in front of the Planning and Zoning
Commission on January 29,2002 but the applicant would like to commence with the
dormer addition immediately. Staff anticipates all outstanding issues as it relates to the
referral departments will be dealt with during the complete review and the referral
departments have agreed this is acceptable.
Staff recommends the CQmmunity Development Director approve this exemption
with conditions.
ApPLICANT:
Alain Degraeve, owner. Represented by Bill Pollock of Zone 4 Architecture.
LOCATION:
200 Sesame Street, Lot 5, Sunny Park North Subdivision.
ZONING:
R-15 PUD.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant has previously received approval for a lot line adjustment with the
neighbor to the northwest, on Lot 7, Sunny Park North Subdivision. The applicant is also
seeking 8040 Greenline Review approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for a
more significant addition.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Because development is proposed within one hundred fifty (150) feet of the 8040
Greenline, the proposal is subject to review under Section 26.68.030 of the Land Use
Code. Section 26.68.030(B), Exemption, states that "the expansion, remodeling or
reconstruction of an existing development shall be exempt from 8040 greenline review if
the following standards are met:
.<t
r",
f")
, "..-....
,.
1. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the
floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of square
footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from poor area
calculations by more than twenty-five (25) percent.
Staff Finding:
The existing structure has a floor area of2548 and the applicant is proposing to add 68
more additional square feet of floor area. The increase is just over 2%.
2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which
a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the
applicant receives a permit pursuant to said section.
Staff Finding:
No trees will be affected by this development.
3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any
geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and
sedimentation.
Staff Finding:
The proposed development is on an existing deck. There is no geologic hazard and the
development will not result in an increase in erosion or sedim:intation.
RECOMMENDA nON:
This application meets thereview criteria for an exemption from the 8040 Greenline
Review by the Director. Staff recommends the Director approve this exemption with the
following two conditions:
I. The applicant shall maintain site drainage on-site during and after construction to prevent
sediment loaded run-off.
2. Construction materials, staging, and parking must be contained on-site.
ApPROVAL:
I hereby approve this 8040 Greenline Exemption for the Degmeve Residence, 200
Sesame Street with the two conditions listed above.
~,L't'tc.-.J<J~ Date //7/C,
Jflie Ann Woods, Community Development DIrector
A.Ppl:'>
/IOI/t-
.'I..:D
J.q/lf "
CO/;/J,fI.i.'lvtlYQ { 2002
~ 'EO'c
C.'h,', ....
"'Q'F "'I',
JlSPfN V1ftl::C1Ll-,
2
n
~
I,t.
if
- '-~~/( /--
--'
~ ----..
' ~ ~""\
I ___-
I ,~"'__.. _
~.,
Cl\,
--.l
~
,~
~~
'/- --1 '
- .
I' ,,',
'./ '.,
"
::>~' ,
, ,
/
,
/--./
,
:~
~,.~
;!S:
'~.
;s~4
~~~
-~----'----
/ --------
/ ..~
.....'-...,
,
:t~
---
..--
~"ri
(IJ~
~ &I,
"i)
~~
~~
~i 1. 7'
,. //1
~ c!
~)(/
/.:.... ..
/ '~'::,
/"\:,-\,,
/ ~S;'~,'
~
". H"''')''
.-
~-" --
--
.-
,r-
I
I
','" '
'=i
7:J
""
~
v
I
~
. .
$ $
.
$
~ $
~-
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
~/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
(
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..-J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
....,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..-J
I
I
I
I
I
i ~' "-
I I
L--------\----r-------------------------------_ J
----,
I \
I \
I \
I \
I \
.\1 \ ~
I \
I
I
I
)
?
?
?
?
?
??
?
?
?
?
?
m ~I~
~;
fl-___
~
~h
Ci
'"
~
'"
z
Gi
IL "I
0
~ " "
~ '" "
~ D'"
....J ",-,
IL " D "<I:
ll:': ~ ~ :13
-:r 03
0 'i! l:'"
>- ",Z
0 Wll': ~ D
....J ~~ '"
IL ~ ill
....J ~12 \) ~
~ -<l '" '"
"'0.. u -'
lI!}- -'
UJ <{ .::\
~
....J WZ 0
ll:': >Z ~ ~
Wijl '" '"
UJ ~'" i5 '"
3 '"
lil>- Ji <D -'
0 z -'
....J 03 UJ ~ -'
l- e; ::\
~ 0 "
z
tiJ
/\
/O? \
?? \
?? \
? \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
<""'\ '
.::::-3\\
/??/ \,
,,~,;:>, \\
:<::-c/ -~ "\
/~~ J~' '\\
/:""',:;(/ltd ~I", /~\
r-=Y
/; II
// Il
// I~
// ~
// ~~
// mW
// ,~
// *F
// II
;/ II
II
"
Zw
~~
tin'
h
o.
~D~I;
~
i-
ll-
,.
~
~
"
~
@)
.
&
~~ ,
~"a
~lii~~~
--1' '~".., ,-1
..,- II / I
I I, I
--- _.J :;l
,
~ \ Q%
=j=f''' '$__,
,
L______
Ii
Ii
~
,
!!
"
,
~
~
=r- -=- -=- ~ l
I
I
I
I
gg
u!~
II
II
II
II
II
I II
L__-W
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I II
L-----------tl- ,
,
z-
<(Q
--1-'
0..::-
ocIg
o i!
o W~
~ ~Z
--1l'J~
ill -<I:
> "'n.
ill 11I>-
...J ~~
OC !!Iii!
ill 01...
Il. "l-
ll. W()
::J OJ
"
"
"
"
JI~~i!:
, tIU;':'~
~ llci~t
.... H"""'lI
~ IIQ~~
~ ::~~~
Iii 11~<Sl~
..-Q,lljiJ
/1" ~111;t ~ <
/ ~I"Q ""~!
\!llll ~ r~ \l. II \:....Jll..:.
___,j, J:...-:- II -~
~ "II :
\ Ir--------1!
I __..l I
~
1-
-'-,
.,
-' i
.,
..;,...
~D
,
,
,
,
,
~ ,f---=-J.J
w
l~
.
~
3
<
~..:::...=~-----c===)>~, \
" /./ ''\ ~
....."M '-r""" '''-.:.I'' I; \::
,-r-.\ I r-----~I (~Ii
1." @> ,I 'r-------
z
~
o
~
"
===4, /J
W
~
-'" -
.....\//
,--
, \ ~---,
".........-.._-~
~ ~I~
Q>
/
~
I
~
$ *
r----
,..-__J
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
...,
I
I
I
. I
10 > I
~ I
I
0 I
I
~ I
~ I
I
~ I
I
I
I
I
r-J
~ I
I
G~ ~ I Q
u$ I '"
O' I ~
"""iil '"
I Z
I Z
I ou
I & "I
"
I ZQ I "
I ~~ " "
I <[~ ~
I ...J =ft 0'"
OU.J
I {l~ 0 iii<l
I ~
I OC i! ::;3
I () Wll ~ ()3
l:OU
I () l;1g OUZ
I ~ 0
\ -l W~ m
" !LO ~
'~ ...J d)~ l'5 8
ID~ ill ~IL OU '"
> wi u .J
<l <I
ill >~ ~
~irl -lW () .3
<I: ~ ~
" Z OC.n '"
, Ii OU
// <tlill- ~
r: 03 Iii ;n .J
l~- Z -'
ill OU -'
l:
( ~ l- is ~
I Q
I
I Z ~ 00
I
I ~
I '-."
I
I
I
I
I tJ)
I
I
I
_____J
I
\
'-
'':..::-",-
/
/
iJ
En
!;~
~ ,&
ffi.
(A ~~
~
E
.
g ~ t
~ u.
~ Q.J
~ ,. ~
x
m
13
i!
~ 0"\
~ JJ
<: Ii
/'~
/' \
\
\
\
/r1-1
// II
// II
/j/ II
//, II
// II
//
// II
// II
//
// II
(i II
~L_~_______~______
r----------~------~
II '\:-'\:-
II '\:-
J I j'i
II II
II II
L
-,
II
II
II
II
II
,I
II
II
II
II
II ,
&-=--=--=--=--=--=-F-=--=--=--=--=--=--=jl.
II II
II L~-_-
II
II
II
/~
,~ \
OF- -=- -=- ~ l
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
II
I [I
L___W
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
-.J~
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
__--11
, ,,\_:J
\
\\
~ \~\
/\
~
~
t.
~
~,
l
I
I
,.,,\\,1
NI
~"
~
ro~
~~
t--
~h
~!S
'~~
,
t
Sk
~~
'! '
,
I
.-
:~
,t1
.;.\
itl.~
?{~
\lJ'lI ;
J I(
~!J
.~,.~.
. '
,~
~~
"";t'o!
~\'
Ll:i ~:
i~j ,J
JUlY..
, ,
) :1'::
i j
l-)j
" ,
, "'...
I
It":. !
, I)'
, iI'
'~
11\1{'>
~~
..' :\'0.
,'(I; ;1\
1(\ ,,'.,j,
i-:ID
I
/
Ii. .,..1'
': h'
d~.,
ION
~~
, ..
~~
[ -.
, i I ~;
, '~
: ,c;.s
i:tJ1l'-i
tr!H
"-! rl\(
i~ ~
NIlS
,i)
I
, ~ I'
" '
i.: :
i'
-------t
~:---'":"'-I I
I
I I
I :
I I
I
1 __ J
~- ---
c
i!
, "
:j i
:; i
'1
i
I;i
; :::
: i
~'i
~U
~~.
~~
LIH\!