Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.council.worksession.20160823 CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION August 23, 2016 4:00 PM, City Council Chambers MEETING AGENDA I. Council Discussion II. Civic Space Options P1 Page 1 of 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Rob Taylor, NV5 & Jeff Pendarvis, Capital Asset Project Manager THROUGH: Jack Wheeler, Capital Asset Manager DATE OF MEMO: August 19, 2016 MEETING DATE: August 23, 2016 RE: Options for Aspen City Hall REQUEST OF COUNCIL: Three Aspen City Hall options are being presented today for design direction and discussion from Council: 1) Galena Option – One Roof Option 2) Armory Reuse without Powerhouse – Three roof option, Armory, Rio, Galena 3) Armory Reuse with Powerhouse – Four roof option, Armory, Rio, Galena, & Powerhouse The goal of today’s session is to find out if Council would like to change the direction given to staff on November 16, 2015 that was to “take the Galena Plaza Option solution to detailed design” and/or if further information is required for analysis and discussion. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: THE GALENA OPTION July 19, 2016 – Galena Option previously approved was shown with additional requested options of the Galena Alternate and an Armory Re-use Option with a Purchase of Space. Council directed staff to produce more information on the use of the Armory as City Hall. July 5, 2016 – Update on the Galena Option and Galena Reuse Option 2.0. Council requested additional phasing and cost information on these options as well as the Galena Alternate. March 7, 2016 – Worksession update on the Galena Option. Council requested to keep modest and humble. Nov 16, 2015 - Worksession. Confirmed - Move the city office project “the Galena Option” at Galena Plaza forward to detailed design. November 3, 2015 - The community was asked in an advisory vote if the Armory building should be used as city offices, or for community use. Community use was preferred. August 3, 2015 – Worksession - Programing of 51,900 sf at Galena Plaza including reuse of the existing Armory for community use was approved to move to detailed design by a vote of 4-1. July 14, 2015 – Worksession – Options of Armory Option, the Galena Option, and the Galena Alternate conceptual designs. Council discussed each design and was in favor of the staff recommendation for the Galena Option 3-2. P2 II. BACKGROUND: • 2015 Final Facilities Master P national space standards and departmental space: • 2014 Facilities Master Plan cond feet (sf) for the Aspen Police Depa • 2012 Aspen Area Community P Historic assets, connections with parks) • Civic Master Plan 2006 adopted; • Purchased Zupancis property in Aspen Police Department is approved by Council to proceed on DISCUSSION: The process that the City of Aspen has gone through to Council is a process that started in 2003 and has been ongoing at some level arrived at three options (included as Exhibit B Galena Option and the Galena Alt Option met the needs of the possible with one question lingering: whether or not the community liked the idea of the repurpos some fashion, to its historic use as a community hall. To gather a sense voters were asked in an advisory question: use?” Community use was preferred. The 2015 and 2016 open RFP process on the future use of the Old Powerhouse meeting all of the criteria needed to execute a lease agreement. an Armory Reuse option, with potential inclusion of reuse of the Powerhouse. Powerhouse use process can be found in Staff memo of July 19, 2016 worksession. GALENA OPTION DISCUSSION: (Current GALENA OPTION DESIGN Galena Option Schematic Design was issued at the end of May Based on recent requests from Council for Option design has been placed ON HOLD. As of the end of August 2016, approximately outreach for the Council approved Galena Option Page 2 of 7 Facilities Master Plan program issued. Current space allocation per person is less than typical space standards and recommended departmental space actually decreases from current lan conducted a detailed departmental analysis and showed need for 14,900 Aspen Police Department and 51,900 sf for City services. 12 Aspen Area Community Plan is aligned with current Galena Option (services in core, preservation of toric assets, connections with parks). Civic Master Plan 2006 adopted; recommended utilization of Galena site for bulk of City Hall space needs upancis property in 2000 with the purpose of providing a public facility on the site Aspen Police Department is approved by Council to proceed on the Zupancis site). has gone through to arrive at the decision and direction that 2003 and has been ongoing at some level through June 2015 (included as Exhibit B) to address a long term, much needed solution. Council felt that the ption met the needs of the organization to provide the best public service whether or not the community liked the idea of the repurpos to its historic use as a community hall. To gather a sense community sentiment, on question: “Should the Armory Building be used as city offices, or for community RFP process on the future use of the Old Powerhouse recently resulted in no applicant to execute a lease agreement. Given this, Staff were requested to look at utilizing an Armory Reuse option, with potential inclusion of reuse of the Powerhouse. Additional discussion of the erhouse use process can be found in Staff memo of July 19, 2016 worksession. (Currently on Hold at Council direction) esign was issued at the end of May 2016 and is currently in Detailed Design requests from Council for iterations, new program options, and a Master Plan review, the Galena ON HOLD. approximately $990,000 will have been spent on design, survey, Galena Option. This is within the current budget. space allocation per person is less than typical departmental space actually decreases from current ucted a detailed departmental analysis and showed need for 14,900 square ption (services in core, preservation of Galena site for bulk of City Hall space needs. 2000 with the purpose of providing a public facility on the site (note: the decision and direction that staff received from June 2015. At that time we to address a long term, much needed solution. Council felt that the organization to provide the best public service whether or not the community liked the idea of the repurposing the Armory, in on November 3, 2015 y offices, or for community resulted in no applicant Given this, Staff were requested to look at utilizing Additional discussion of the Detailed Design Phase. lan review, the Galena spent on design, survey, estimating and P3 II. Page 3 of 7 Preliminary Galena Option site planning (Schematic Design) GALENA OPTION PROGRAM: The baseline program is on track for all departments and common spaces such as Council Chambers, Sister Cities, shared meeting rooms, locker rooms, flex spaces, mail etc. The program of 51,900 sf is met under one roof. There is an additional 2,700 sf of potential space that staff is seeking future Council direction on for ACRA, whether this should be co-located or be in an alternate lease or owned location. GALENA OPTION CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS: The Galena Plaza Option has the least impact on the community as it is one project, which will be completed in 24 months. When complete, public services will move out of their current locations into the new building. Basically this option constructs space that does not affect City Services at all, and then the City moves into a new building. GALENA OPTION FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Galena Option current budget is at $31.3 million, on budget for the base program of 51,900 sf and still subject to ongoing value engineering efforts by the design team. The schematic design has been priced by Shaw Construction and is a more developed cost estimate than other City Hall option program estimates being presented today. Per the City’s Finance Department, funding for one site at Galena at $31.3 million and would be financed through a combination of cash ($20.7 million) and financing ($10.6 million). The annual debt service payment would be mostly from the Asset Management Plan Fund, supported by departmental contributions. LOCATION GALENA OPTION Armory – Repurposed to community (19,800 sf) 0 Purchase space 0 455 Rio Grande and 425 Rio Grande 51,900 Powerhouse – Repurposed to community (8,000 sf) 0 TOTAL (GSF) 51,900 PROGRAM BUDGET Schematic Design $31.3Million* GALENA OPTION - PROS AND CONS: PROS CONS • Seamless transition of Public Service • All core services under one roof • Doesn’t discard sunk cost and time to date • Is consistent with the 2015 vote • Requires 43,700 sf of new building • Moves services to the other side of Main Street • Adds traffic and heavy use to Rio Grande Street P4 II. Page 4 of 7 • Aligns with the Civic Master plan • Aligns with the Aspen Area Community Plan • Could push capital costs for the Armory to another party outside the General Fund • Relieves parking and traffic in the Core • Could accommodate long term ACRA offices in the Armory. • Does not lease property at market rate • Does not buy property tied with unknown future risks • Is offset by 10,900 sf of current ACRA and Rio (i.e. gross add is not 54,600 sf) • Fiscally responsible with no tax increase ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITHOUT POWERHOUSE ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITHOUT POWERHOUSE DESIGN Given direction from July 19, 2016, this option enables a full refurbishment of the Armory AFTER a new component of City services is constructed at the Galena location (current ACRA at 425 Rio Grande Place). This option offers provides almost seamless service for current City Services in that after the new structure is built, the Armory program can move to Galena, while the Armory gets its necessary Code, ADA, Structural, Safety, Functional, and Performance upgrades, where the City can then be consolidated under the three roof scenario of “Galena, Rio and the Armory”. ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITHOUT POWERHOUSE CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS: The Reuse Option without Powerhouse will be two major construction projects at Galena and the Armory, and a minor upgrade of the current Rio Grande building to reconfigure for City Offices. ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITHOUT POWERHOUSE FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Per the City’s Finance Department, funding for the City’s reuse of the Armory, basic renovation of the Rio Grande and a new 28,400 sf building at Galena at a TOTAL COST of $36 to $39 mil would require cash of $21 mil and financing of $15 to $18 mil. LOCATION ARMORY REUSE OPTION Armory - full remodel (+ small addition) - REUSE 19,800 Rio – (455 Rio Grande – existing space) - REUSE 6,400 Galena – (425 Rio Grande Place current ACRA) – NEW SPACE 28,400 Powerhouse (full community use at 8,000 sf, REUSE) 0 sf for City 0 TOTAL (Gross Square Footage)** 54,600 PROGRAM BUDGET rough order of magnitude* $35.9 - $38.6 Million* *ROM unit pricing and current market pricing ** Gross Square footage impact of 5%-10% could occur due to multiple locations Phasing costs for this Armory Reuse Option without Powerhouse are reduced, given the current City configuration can be held without loss of City service. ACRA will move to Powerhouse during construction of Phase1. ARMORY REUSE WITHOUT POWERHOUSE - PROS AND CONS: PROS CONS • Uses current configuration for City offices • Can Maintain the seat of government at the Historic Armory • Keeps government in the Downtown Core • Can be phased • Reduces GSF of new construction by 19,800 sf • Aligns with the Aspen Area Community Plan • Is $5 - $8 million more expensive, is difficult to pay for over the next 10 years. • Three roofs (Galena, Rio, Armory) = confusing municipal planning, disparate customer service, difficult parking, loss of efficiency • Six roofs during temporary use • Against the vote for Armory Community use P5 II. Page 5 of 7 • Aligns with the Civic Master Plan • No tax increase • Loss of +/- $1,000,000 sunk costs to date on Council approved Galena Option • Large construction risk incurred with Armory renovation • Potential increase in Gross Square Footage due to multiple buildings i.e. more stairs, elevators, corridors, bathrooms, etc. • Less efficient staff utilization if travel time is factored ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITH POWERHOUSE ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITH POWERHOUSE DESIGN Given direction from July 19, 2016, this option enables a full refurbishment of the Armory AFTER a new component of City services is constructed at the Galena location (current ACRA at 425 Rio Grande Place). Similar to use without the Powerhouse, this option can offer almost seamless service for current City Services in that after the new structure at Galena is built, the Armory program can move to Galena, while the Armory gets its necessary Code, ADA, Structural, Safety, Functional, and Performance upgrades, where the City can then be consolidated under the three roof scenario of “Galena, Rio and the Armory”. Given recent developments in Powerhouse usage, the Powerhouse refurbishment could happen sooner and allow Asset, Transportation, Environmental (possibly other departments given a detailed program and space design) and meeting to be closer to the Core prior to the overall completion in mid-2020. ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITH POWERHOUSE CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS: The Reuse Option with Powerhouse will be two major construction projects at Galena and the Armory, a moderate remodel at the Powerhouse and a minor upgrade of the current Rio Grande building to reconfigure for City Offices. ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITH POWERHOUSE FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: Per the City’s Finance Department, funding for the City’s reuse of the Armory, moderate upgrade of the Powerhouse, basic renovation of the Rio Grande and a new 20,400 sf building at Galena at a TOTAL COST of $35 to $38 mil would require cash of $21 mil and financing of $14 to $17 mil. LOCATION ARMORY REUSE OPTION Armory - full remodel (+ small addition) - REUSE 19,800 Rio – (455 Rio Grande – existing space) - REUSE 6,400 Galena – (425 Rio Grande Place current ACRA) – NEW SPACE 20,400 Powerhouse (zero community use) all use for City 8,000 TOTAL (Gross Square Footage)** 54,600 PROGRAM BUDGET rough order of magnitude $35 to $38Million* *ROM unit pricing and current market pricing ** Gross Square footage impact of 5%-10% could occur due to multiple locations Phasing costs for this Armory Reuse Option with Powerhouse are reduced, given the current City configuration can be held without loss of City service. ACRA will move to Powerhouse during construction of Phase 1. ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE - PROS AND CONS: PROS CONS • Uses current configuration for City offices • Can Maintain the seat of government at the Historic Armory • Keeps government in the Downtown Core • Is $4 - $7 million more expensive, is difficult to pay for over the next 10 years. • Four roofs (Galena, Rio, Armory, Powerhouse) = confusing municipal planning, P6 II. Page 6 of 7 • Can be phased • Reduces GSF of new construction by 27,800 sf • Aligns with the Aspen Area Community Plan • Aligns with the Civic Master Plan • No tax increase disparate customer service, difficult parking, loss of efficiency • Six roofs during temporary use • Against the vote for Armory Community use • Loss of +/- $1,000,000 sunk costs to date on Council approved Galena Option • Large construction risk incurred with Armory and Powerhouse renovation • Potential increase in Gross Square Footage due to multiple buildings i.e. more stairs, elevators, corridors, bathrooms, etc. • Less efficient staff utilization if travel time is factored The impacts of each the option as related to new square footage in town is shown below RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff request Council discuss design direction on the City Hall location options. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Attachment Exhibit A – Pros and Cons Exhibit B – Presentation Exhibit C – ROM Budget P7 II. Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT A – PROS AND CONS Galena Option Armory Reuse Parking Reduces parking and traffic in core Doesn’t reduce parking and traffic in core Construction More new construction by COA– Less new construction likely by others Least new construction by COA- Most new construction likely by others Shorter Construction on one site Longest Construction on 3-4 sites Construction activity affects fewer people Construction activity affects most people Less square feet needed for building appropriate facilities due to building/design efficiency Most square feet needed to building appropriate facilities due to building/design inefficiency Fewer building systems and spaces to build and maintain Most building systems and spaces to build and maintain Allows for best future flexibility Allows for least future flexibility Civic Most effectively activates underutilized city assets (parking garage/plaza) Least effectively activates underutilized city assets (parking garage/plaza) Completes “civic blocks” and consolidates public services Less “Civic Block” orientation with 3-4 sites and fractured service. Although does still allow connection to Galena. Potentially allows Powerhouse and Armory to be used as public functions One option potentially allows Powerhouse to be used as public functions after construction phase Efficiency Best building/space efficiency Least building/space efficiency Best energy efficiency Least energy efficiency Best staff efficiency Least staff efficiency Cost Less cost assumed for LEED/WELL design and construction More cost needed for LEED/WELL design and construction as well as Historic construction needs and multiple mobilizations as well as escalation P8 II. CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT OPTION STUDY Aspen City Council Work Session August 23, 2016 ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 1 P 9 I I . TODAYS GOALS •Given July 19, 2016 discussion Armory should be considered for some of City Hall •Present options for City Office long term solution to Council to have discussion on long term solution –LOCATION –COST ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 2 P 1 0 I I . SPACE PROGRAM •SPACE PROGRAM ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 3 P 1 1 I I . 1. GALENA OPTION •Currently ON HOLD at start of Detailed Design •Currently designed to program at 51,900 sf city program plus ACRA 2,700 sf = 54,600 sf •$1mil spent on design to date •Total - $31.2 mil base program ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 4 P 1 2 I I . SITE LOCATION MAP - GALENA OPTION AUGUST 2016 MAIN STREET HOPKINS STREET RIO GRANDE PLACE RIO GRANDE PARK PROPOSED CITY OFFICES POWERHOUSE BUILDING PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY COMMUNITY BANKS OF COLORADO PITKIN COUNTY COURT- HOUSE ARMORY 517 HOPKINS PITKIN COUNTY JAIL PITKIN COUNTY SHERRIFF BUILDING PROPOSED COUNTY ANNEX OBERMEYER BUILDING HOTEL JEROME PROPOSED POLICE STATION GALENA PLAZA BLEEKER STREET S M I L L S T R E E T S G A L E N A S T R E E T S H U N T E R S T R E E T GALENA OPTION 54,600 SF GALENA ARMORY RETURNS TO THE PUBLIC P 1 3 I I . GALENA OPTION JULY 2016 ASPEN CITY HALL AT GALENA 52,000 SF P 1 4 I I . VIEW FROM MAIN STREET - ALL CITY OFFICES AT GALENA JULY 2016 GALENA PLAZA ENTRY AND CITY HALL LOBBY SISTER CITIES EXISTING RIO GRANDE GARAGE ELEVATOR AND STAIR (CITY OFFICES EAST WING BEYOND) LIBRARY COUNCIL CHAMBERS P 1 5 I I . GALENA PLAZA VIEW JULY 2016 ALL CITY OFFICES AT GALENA EAST WINGWEST WING GALENA PLAZA P 1 6 I I . RIO GRANDE PARK AERIAL VIEW JULY 2016 ALL CITY OFFICES AT GALENA WEST WING EAST WING RIO GRANDE PL.NEW STAIRS GARAGE ACCESS GALENA PLAZA LIBRARY 30’-35’ SETBACK FROM RIO GRANDE PL. CURB P 1 7 I I . • GALENA PLAZA 54,600 SF • ARMORY RETURNS TO THE PUBLIC ASPEN CITY HALL GALENA OPTION 23 AUGUST 20161 P 1 8 I I . 2. ARMORY REUSE without POWERHOUSE •New space at Galena (28,400 sf) •Reuse Armory major renovation (19,800 sf) •455 Rio Grande basic remodel (6,400 sf) •Galena 28.4 - $19.3 – 20.7 mil •Armory - $15.1 – 16.3 mil •Rio - $0.5 mil •Sunk costs - $1.0 mil •Total - $35.9 – 38.6 mil (programmed only) ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 5 P 1 9 I I . SITE LOCATION MAP - ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITHOUT POWERHOUSE AUGUST 2016 MAIN STREET HOPKINS STREET RIO GRANDE PLACE RIO GRANDE PARK PROPOSED CITY OFFICES POWERHOUSE BUILDING PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY COMMUNITY BANKS OF COLORADO PITKIN COUNTY COURT- HOUSE ARMORY 517 HOPKINS PITKIN COUNTY JAIL PITKIN COUNTY SHERRIFF BUILDING PROPOSED COUNTY ANNEX OBERMEYER BUILDING HOTEL JEROME PROPOSED POLICE STATION RIO GRANDE BUILDING GALENA PLAZA BLEEKER STREET S M I L L S T R E E T S G A L E N A S T R E E T S H U N T E R S T R E E T ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITHOUT POWERHOUSE 28,400 SF GALENA 19,800 SF ARMORY 6,400 SF RIO GRANDE 54,600 SF P 2 0 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITHOUT POWERHOUSE • 28,400 SF AT GALENA • 19,800 SF ARMORY AS CITY OFFICES • 6,400 SF RIO GRANDE BUILDING • 54,600 SF TOTAL ASPEN CITY HALL 23 AUGUST 20162 P 2 1 I I . 3. ARMORY REUSE with POWERHOUSE •New space at Galena (20,400 sf) •Reuse Armory major renovation (19,800 sf) •455 Rio Grande basic remodel (6,400 sf) •Powerhouse renovation (8,000 sf) •Galena 20.4 - $14.7 – 15.8 mil •Armory - $15.1 – 16.3 mil •Rio - $0.5 mil Powerhouse - $3.5 – 3.8 mil •Sunk costs - $1.0 mil •Total - $34.9 – 37.6 mil (programmed only) ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 6 P 2 2 I I . SITE LOCATION MAP - ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITH POWERHOUSE AUGUST 2016 MAIN STREET HOPKINS STREET RIO GRANDE PLACE RIO GRANDE PARK PROPOSED CITY OFFICES POWERHOUSE BUILDING PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY COMMUNITY BANKS OF COLORADO PITKIN COUNTY COURT- HOUSE ARMORY 517 HOPKINS PITKIN COUNTY JAIL PITKIN COUNTY SHERRIFF BUILDING PROPOSED COUNTY ANNEX OBERMEYER BUILDING HOTEL JEROME PROPOSED POLICE STATION RIO GRANDE BUILDING GALENA PLAZA BLEEKER STREET S M I L L S T R E E T S G A L E N A S T R E E T S H U N T E R S T R E E T ARMORY REUSE OPTION WITH POWERHOUSE 20,400 SF GALENA 19,800 SF ARMORY 6,400 SF RIO GRANDE 8,000 SF POWERHOUSE 54,600 SF P 2 3 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE • 20,400 SF AT GALENA • 19,800 SF ARMORY AS CITY OFFICES • 6,400 SF RIO GRANDE BUILDING • 8,000 SF POWERHOUSE • 54,600 SF TOTAL ASPEN CITY HALL 23 AUGUST 20163 P 2 4 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE ARMORY REUSE WITHOUT POWERHOUSE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 AUGUST 20164 P 2 5 I I . SUMMARY Option Cost (MIL) Complete GALENA $31.2 LATE 2018 ARMORY no P’H $35.9 - $38.6 MID 2020 ARMORY with P’H $34.9 - $37.6 MID 2020 ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 7 P 2 6 I I . NEW SQUARE FOOTAGE * with multiple locations, risk of SF increase Option Program Reuse SF Replaced SF Added SF GALENA 54,600 0 10,900 43,700 ARMORY no P’H* 54,600 26,200 4,500 23,900 ARMORY with P’H* 54,600 34,200 4,500 15,900 ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 8 P 2 7 I I . SAFETY FACTORS TO CONSIDER –ADA Compliance –Security – can be responsibly managed with a modern, up to date facility –Areas of refuge –Travel time between and within buildings for ADA staff and customers –Indoor environment – LEED and Well Building ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 9 P 2 8 I I . SERVICE/ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY –Common theme of exit interviews is that the physical work environment is a negative –Further Fractured public service –Security expert (MWL memo) state that confusing and fractured service increases risk of staff threat and incidents –Consolidation will improve service & efficiency ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 10 P 2 9 I I . FUNDING •Galena Option –Cash $21 mil and finance $10 mil •Armory without Powerhouse Option –Cash $21 mil, finance $15 - $18 mil •Armory with Powerhouse Option –Cash $21 mil, finance $14 - $17 mil ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 11 P 3 0 I I . DECISION POINT •Council confirm decision of Nov 16, 2016 for the Galena Option, or provide staff direction on another option. •Does Council need any additional information for a September work session? ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 12 P 3 1 I I . Discussion and Questions? ASPEN CIVIC SPACE RELOCATION PROJECT August 23, 2016 13 P 3 2 I I . GALENA OPTION - GALENA - PLAZA LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 3 3 I I . GALENA OPTION - GALENA - MIDDLE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 3 4 I I . GALENA OPTION- GALENA - RIO GRANDE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 3 5 I I . GALENA OPTION - GALENA - BASEMENT LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 3 6 I I . ARMORY REUSE A - GALENA - PLAZA LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 3 7 I I . ARMORY REUSE A - GALENA - MIDDLE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 3 8 I I . ARMORY REUSE A - GALENA - RIO GRANDE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 3 9 I I . ARMORY REUSE A - GALENA - BASEMENT LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 4 0 I I . ARMORY REUSE A - ARMORY BUILDING - THIRD FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 4 1 I I . ARMORY REUSE A - ARMORY BUILDING - SECOND FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE P 4 2 I I . ARMORY REUSE A - ARMORY BUILDING - FIRST FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 4 3 I I . ARMORY REUSE A - ARMORY BUILDING - BASEMENT NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 4 4 I I . ARMORY REUSE B - GALENA - PLAZA LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 4 5 I I . ARMORY REUSE B - GALENA - MIDDLE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 4 6 I I . ARMORY REUSE B - GALENA - RIO GRANDE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 4 7 I I . ARMORY REUSE B- GALENA - BASEMENT LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 4 8 I I . ARMORY REUSE B - ARMORY BUILDING - THIRD FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 4 9 I I . ARMORY REUSE B - ARMORY BUILDING - SECOND FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE P 5 0 I I . ARMORY REUSE B - ARMORY BUILDING - FIRST FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 5 1 I I . ARMORY REUSE B - ARMORY BUILDING - BASEMENT NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 5 2 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE A - GALENA - PLAZA LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 5 3 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE A - GALENA - MIDDLE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 5 4 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE A - GALENA - RIO GRANDE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 5 5 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE A - GALENA - BASEMENT LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 5 6 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE A - ARMORY BUILDING - THIRD FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 5 7 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE A - ARMORY BUILDING - SECOND FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 5 8 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE A - ARMORY BUILDING - FIRST FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 5 9 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE A - ARMORY BUILDING - BASEMENT NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 6 0 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE B - GALENA - PLAZA LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 6 1 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE B - GALENA - MIDDLE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 6 2 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE B - GALENA - RIO GRANDE LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 6 3 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE B - GALENA - BASEMENT LEVEL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 6 4 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE B - ARMORY BUILDING - THIRD FLOORASPEN CITY HALL NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE 23 August 2016 P 6 5 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE B - ARMORY BUILDING - SECOND FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 6 6 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE B - ARMORY BUILDING - FIRST FLOOR NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 6 7 I I . ARMORY REUSE WITH POWERHOUSE B - ARMORY BUILDING - BASEMENT NOTE: PLANS INCLUDE BUT DON’T INDICATE COMMON SPACE ASPEN CITY HALL 23 August 2016 P 6 8 I I . Op t i o n P r o g r a m R e u s e S F R e p l a c e d S F A d d e d S F N o t e s C o s t P r o g r a m m e d f l o o r p l a n P e r S F S t a r t F i n i s h Ga l e n a O p t i o n Ga l e n a 54 6 0 0 31 , 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ Do n e 57 1 $ 1-Jul-17 30-Dec-18 AC R A 45 0 0 in c l de m o a n d r e p l a c e in c l u d e d n/ a Ri o G r a n d e 64 0 0 de m o a n d r e p l a c e in c l u d e d n/ a Ar m o r y R e u s e f o r C o m m u n i t y av a i l a b l e by o t h e r s Su n k c o s t s - $ ex c l To t a l 54 6 0 0 0 10 9 0 0 43 7 0 0 ba s e o p t i o n c o s t 31 , 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 57 1 $ 50% DD drawings Ar m o r y R e u s e w i t h o u t P o w e r h o u s e Ga l e n a 28 4 0 0 Ga l e n a w e s t . R i o e a s t d o e s n ’ t f i t 19 , 2 6 0 , 0 0 0 $ Mo s t l y d o n e , r e v i e w 67 8 $ 20 , 7 0 4 , 5 0 0 1-Jul-17 30-Dec-18 Ar m o r y 19 8 0 0 19 8 0 0 fu l l r e f u r b , l o n g t e r m 15 , 1 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ Mo s t l y d o n e , r e v i e w 76 4 $ 16 , 2 6 4 , 7 5 0 1-Jul-19 29-Dec-20 Po w e r h o u s e Ri o G r a n d e 64 0 0 64 0 0 no m i n a l w o r k , r e d o T a s t e r s 50 0 , 0 0 0 $ Mo s t l y d o n e , r e v i e w 78 $ 53 7 , 5 0 0 1-Jul-17 28-Dec-17 AC R A 45 0 0 in c l de m o a n d r e p l a c e in c l u d e d n/ a Su n k c o s t s 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ De s i g n c o s t s t o d a t e 18 $ 1, 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 done To t a l 54 6 0 0 26 2 0 0 45 0 0 23 9 0 0 35 , 9 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 38 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 65 8 $ 38 , 5 9 2 , 5 0 0 No design complete concept only 11 5 % ` 1 Ar m o r y R e u s e w i t h P o w e r h o u s e - Ga l e n a 20 4 0 0 Ga l e n a w e s t . S h o w R i o / e a s t m a s s i n g 14 , 6 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ Mo s t l y d o n e , r e v i e w 72 0 $ 15 , 7 8 1 , 0 0 0 1-Jul-17 30-Dec-18 Ar m o r y 19 8 0 0 19 8 0 0 fu l l r e f u r b , l o n g t e r m 15 , 1 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ Mo s t l y d o n e , r e v i e w 76 4 $ 16 , 2 6 4 , 7 5 0 1-Jul-19 29-Dec-20 Po w e r h o u s e 80 0 0 80 0 0 re f u r b p ' h o u s e , C o A c o s t s 3, 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ Mo s t l y d o n e , r e v i e w 43 8 $ 3, 7 6 2 , 5 0 0 1-Jul-17 1-Jul-18 Ri o G r a n d e 64 0 0 64 0 0 no m i n a l w o r k , r e d o T a s t e r s 50 0 , 0 0 0 $ Mo s t l y d o n e , r e v i e w 78 $ 53 7 , 5 0 0 1-Jul-17 28-Dec-17 AC R A 45 0 0 in c l de m o a n d r e p l a c e in c l u d e d n/ a Su n k c o s t s 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ De s i g n c o s t s t o d a t e 18 $ 1, 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 done To t a l 54 6 0 0 34 2 0 0 45 0 0 15 9 0 0 34 , 9 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 37 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 63 9 $ 37 , 5 1 7 , 5 0 0 No design complete concept only 11 2 % 12 1 % Ga l e n a O p t i o n 54 , 6 0 0 - 10 , 9 0 0 43 , 7 0 0 Ar m o r y R e u s e w i t h o u t P o w e r h o u s e 54 , 6 0 0 26 , 2 0 0 4, 5 0 0 23 , 9 0 0 Ar m o r y R e u s e w i t h P o w e r h o u s e 54 , 6 0 0 34 , 2 0 0 4, 5 0 0 15 , 9 0 0 Ro u g h O r d e r o f M a g n i t u d e B u d g e t P69II.