HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sp.Rio Grande Skate.A03300
h
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL In #
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
/"
i""""
, J
:~.'.__..!.
A033-00
2737-073-06851
Rio Grande Skateboard Park
Rio Grande Park
Nick Lelack
SPA Amendment
City of Aspen Parks Dept
Rebecca Shickling and Scott Chism
5/9/00
Ordinance #14-2000
5/17/00
J. Lindt
{-o,
l~
" ;
.
"'l"~. _...-
~
t)
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section
26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights",
of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific
development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein.
The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year .vested
property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the- third
anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved
pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a
revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to ,Section 26.308.010, After Expiration of
vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any
growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject
to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below. .
City of Aspen Parks and Recreation Department, 585 Cemetery Lane, Aspen, CO 81611
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number
Rio Grande Park
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
Specially Planned Area Amendment
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan
Ordinance #14-2000.5/9/00
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
Mav 20, 2000
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
May 21, 2003
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration
and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.0 I 0 of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code.)
Issued this 20th day of May, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community
Development Director.
\. &CJ~0
Juli i\nn Woods, Community Development Director
~. ... -......
,
"
'r";
~
\:i
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development
plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the
City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the
following described property: Rio Grande Park, by Ordinance of the City Council
numbered 14, series of 2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the
Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970)
920-5090.
s/City of Aspen Account
Publish in The Aspen Times on May 20, 2000
r",
~
W,d.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THRU:
Steve Barwick, City Manager
John Worcester, City Attorney
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Directo
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director
FROM:
Nick Lelack, Planner~W
Specially Planned Area Review to Build a Skateboard Park and to
Relocate the Basketball Court on Rio Grande Park, Site B - Second
Reading!]>ublic Hearin~
RE:
DATE:
May 8, 2000
SUMMARY: The proposal is to build a 17,000 square foot depressed skateboard park where
the basketball court currently exists and to build a new basketball court in the undeveloped
area shown in the photograph to the right. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval by a 5 to 2 vote on April 18. Please see Exhibit B for an aerial photo.
ApPLICANT:
City Parks Department
ZONING:
Public, Specially Planned Area Overlay
REPRESENTATIVES:
Rebecca Shickling, City Parks Deputy Director
Scott Chism, City Parks Planner
LOCATION:
Rio Grande Park, Site B
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Final Specially Planned Area (SPA) Review: This two step process requires approval of a
development plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, with public
hearings occurring at both. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend
approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval to the City Council. The Rio Gran,de
master plan was developed as a conceptual SPA Plan. F 9ll.owing its adoption, new
development or significant alterations must be consistent with this conceptual SPA plan and
be reviewed pursuant to the final SPA development review process.
1
I"""i
n
STAFF COMMENTS:
The City of Aspen Parks Deparment, ("Applicant"), represented by Scott Chism, Parks
Planner, is requesting approval of a Specially Planned Area Review to build a
skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B. City
COullcil and the Planning and Zoning Commission endorsed the Rio Grande Master Plan
in 1993,
Rio Grande Park is divided into two (2) sites, Site A and Site B. Site A is located
between the bike path and row of large Cottonwoods that edge the playing field, and the
river. It also includes the snow melter and the drainage pond closest to Mill Street. Site
B encompasses the recycle site, access road to Site A, the triangle of open space between
the access road and bike/pedestrian path, and the playing field, It is bordered by Rio
Grande Drive, Mill Street, and a row of Cottonwoods and the bike/pedestrian path to the
north. The proposed skateboard park would be located on Site B in the open space
triangle, which currently contains a basketball court and opeu space.
The Master Plan outlines recommended land uses/activities for Site B, A half-pipe
skateboard ramp is identified as one ofthe activities intended for this parcel (page
16). Although the proposed skateboard park is larger than a half-pipe ramp, the proposed
skateboard park is consistent with the Master Plan and conceptual review, Specifically,
the Plan's Recommended Actions for Site B include the following actions:
· The City should work with the Youth Center to development more recreational
activities on Site B.
· The Youth Center and the City should install a half-pipe skateboard ramp in the open
space between the recycle facility and the playing field.
Site B is relatively flat, and contains stable soils and no utilities other than an existing
electrical line.
Site B is a relatively small area that will be incorporated into the overall Civic Center
Master Plan, scheduled to be completed by late autumn. The Civic Center Master Plan
will address a permanent location for restroom facilities for this area. Currently, seasonal
san-o-Iets are located in the park near the theater. This proposal includes the provision of
two more san-o-Iet enclosures for all park users, In addition, public restrooms are located
across Rio Grande Place in the parking garage and at the Youth Center.
Key skateboard park elements include the following:
· The centerpiece of the proposal is a 17,000 square foot, "L-shape," in-ground,
concrete skateboard park containing areas for all skill levels. Building concrete
structures below the natural grade would minimize the noise and visual impacts of
the skateboard park.
· The basketball court would be relocated to the north with better sun exposure.
· The existing drinking fountain would be relocated to the plaza space; the plaza
space would serve as the park entry.
2
i":
!~
· A 35-foot buffer zone south of the Rio Grande Trail would be created, exceeding
the 20- foot buffer zone outlined in the master plan.
· No new parking spaces would be created.
· No new lights would be added to the park.
The City Council should also be aware that any future rail or trolley facility would be
located in the playing field area to the west as identified in the Master Plan,
On April 18, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 2 to recommend that
City Council approve the Specially Planned Area Review for the skateboard park
with conditions. A draft of the meeting minutes from this hearing are attached as
Exhibit C. A couple of Commissioners and one member of the public, John Bush,
raised concerns over how the proposed development of the new skateboard park,
relocated basketball court, and landscaping would affect the development of a Trolley
System (tracks and poles, car barn facility, trolley cars, etc.). Specifically, these
members opposed the application because the site plan did not indicate how a Trolley
System could function on this site juxtaposed to the skateboard park and basketball
court; therefore, they did not believe they could make an informed decision.
Other Commissioners explained that, although they have long supported the concept of
a Trolley System, no development plans for it have been proposed and may not be
proposed for the next 10, 20, or even 50 years, These members stated that they do not
want this application delayed because it will provide an immediate, needed recreation
amenity for the community's youth. These members strongly support the application,
The Commission approved a recommendation that the Parks Department provide a
Trolley System overlay on the site plan for Council's review. The Commission also
recommends that transportation rights for the park be superior to all other rights in the
future. The Trolley System overlay will be presented to City Council at the public
hearing for this application on May 8,
Staff does not believe a condition recognizing the superiority of transportation rights
for the park is necessary for two (2) reasons. First, Parks Department Staff contends
that the proposed skateboard park, relocated basketball court and landscape plan have
been designed in a manner that respects any future transportation/trolley uses for the
park.
Second, the Rio Grande Master Plan states that, "Because the site was purchased with
7'h Penny Transportation funds, the basis of future development goals is
transportation oriented." Therefore, transportation uses of the park shall remain the
priority use,
It should be noted that the Rio Grande Master Plan does not designate a Trolley System
as the designated use for the park; rather, it lists the system as one possible use. The
first recommendation in the Recommended Actions for Site B is the following: The
City of Aspen should decide whether II City-wide trolley system is appropriate in
3
~
n
Aspen, This decision has not yet been made and will likely be further explored as part of
the Civic Center Master Plan.
Community Development Staff supports the proposed skateboard park development
because it (1) meets the review criteria, (2) provides an important community
recreation facility, and (3) would be designed in a manner that minimizes its overall
impact on the park, the neighborhood, and respects the transportation use options that
have been contemplated through the years for this site.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval of the Specially Planned Area Review to build
a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park,
Site B, with the following conditions:
1. All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect.
2. Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained,
3. Currently, the fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present
basketball courts. The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will allow
for the continuation of these demonstration classes.
4. The Applicant shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric
Department.
5. The Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park.
6. A water spigot for the cleanout of the area should be provided, It may be possible to
use the irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow.
7. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction. A washed rock
or other style mud rack must be installed on site during construction.
8. Prior to Construction:
a. The Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for the removal of trees on site.
b, The Applicant shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan for
the site. Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficial to use the flood
routing concept which would control the water flow from drainage through
depressions in the landscaping,
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Ordinance No. 14, Series of 2000, the Specially Planned Area Review to
build a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B."
4
r'-.
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
fl
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Review Criteria and Staff Findings
Aerial Photograph of Rio Grande Park
Draft Meeting Minutes from the April 18, 2000, Planning and
Zoning Commission Public Hearing
C:\home\nickl\Active Cases\Rio Grand SPA Skateboard Park Amendment\CC Public Hearing.doc
5
r\
~
, i
EXHIBIT A
RIo GRANDE SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA REVIEW
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
26.440.050. Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA).
In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final
development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider
the following:
1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the
mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use,
density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space.
Staff Finding
Staff believes the proposed skateboard park is compatible with and enhances the mix of
development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height,
bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space, The proposed development would be
located in the Rio Grande Park. The skateboard park would enhance the mix of
recreation activities in and around the park, which include a large playing field,
basketball court, bike/pedestrian paths, and fly fishing in the Roaring Fork River.
A wide-range of land uses exist in the immediate vicinity, including civic, institutional,
commercial, office, recreational, retail, and light industrial uses. This development would
add to the eclectic mix of uses in and around the area.
The proposal is to build depressed concrete structures. The height, bulk and architecture
are compatible with the park and its surroundings, Landscaping will be provided to
create a "canopy effect" around the depressed structures, and open space will be
maintained to the greatest extent practicable.
A half-pipe skateboard ramp is identified as one of the activities intended for this parcel
in the Rio Grande Master Plan. Although the proposed skateboard consists of more
structures than a half-pipe ramp, the structures are depressed. The proposed development
is consistent with the Rio Grande Master Plan and conceptual review approvaL This
criterion is addressed.
2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the
proposed development.
Staff Finding
Adequate roads exist to service the proposed skateboard park. Access to this park feature
is provided by Rio Grande Place as well as the stairs connecting Rio Grande Place to
Galena Street. RFT A and the Galena Street Shuttle service this area.
1
,-"
n
Currently, seasonal san-o-Iets are located in the park near the theater. This proposal
includes the provision oftwo more san-o-Iet enclosures for all park users. In addition,
public restrooms are located across Rio Grande Place in the parking garage and Youth
Center. The Civic Center Master Plan will address a permanent location for restroom
facilities for this area.
The existing drinking fountain would be relocated to a new plaza serving as the park's
entrance. An existing conduit, or electrical line, would be relocated as part of this
development. Parking impacts are not expected to be significant since the nature of
skateboarding is transportation and recreation; it is likely that skateboarders will arrive at
the park on their skateboards, by bus, or on foot. This criterion is addressed,
3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for
development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of
mudjlow, rockfalls, avalanche dangers andflood hazards.
Staff Finding
Staff believes Site B is suitable for the development of a skateboard park. The
Applicant has stated that the soils are stable and has provided a Geo-technical report
documenting this finding. This site is not susceptible to mud flow, rock falls,
avalanche dangers, or flood hazards, This criterion is met.
4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning
techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental
impacts and provide open space, trails and similar. amenities for the users of the
project and the public at large.
Staff Finding
Staff believes the proposed development employs exceptional land planning techniques
in this design. Depressing the concrete structures preserves all view planes, avoids
adverse environmental impacts, and minimizes potential visual and noise impacts. The
design also preserves open space, trails, and all park amenities for users and the public at
large. In addition, the basketball court would be relocated to maximize sun exposure, and
new park amenities would be provided, including the skateboard park and more san-o-
lets, And, the provision of a 35-foot buffer from the Rio Grande Trail exceeds the 20-
foot recommendation in the Master Plan. Further, the proposal provides structures for
skateboarders of all levels, and separates the beginners from the experts for safety and
enjoyment reasons, This criterion is met.
5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen
Area Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Finding
Although the AACP does not address expanding recreational opporturiities in town, the
location of the proposed skateboard park is consistent with many AACP goals. For
example, the park is located in the center of town, making it accessible by alternative
2
r'\,
"'""
modes of transportation such as by bus, bike, skateboard, or on foot. The plan also calls
for creating mixed use developments, and this park will enhance the variety of land uses
that already exist on Rio Grande Park and in the immediate vicinity, Staff believes this
criterion is addressed.
6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of
excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the
surrounding neighborhood.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive
public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood,
City Council has appropriated funds for all aspects of the project out of the Parks
Department budget. This criterion is addressed.
7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20)
percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section
26.445.040(B)(2).
StaffFinding
The slopes do not exceed 20%; this criterion is not applicable.
8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed
development.
Staff Finding
No GMQS allotments are required for this project; this criterion is not applicable.
3
/;:<::c;:
.~
+J
.....
,.0
.....
~
.x
S-
o
a..
~
-c
c
a
L
(,!)
o
o-
ct.
i:.LI
,......"
r'\
z
r:/)
r>.,
ASPEN PLANNING,"", ZONING COMMlSSlON
n ~~l~ rr c.
, . APRIL 18. 2000
Bob Blaich opened the special meeting at 4:30 p.m. in the Sister Cities Meeting
Room with Jasmine Tygre, Roger Hunt, Roger Haneman, Steven Buettow, Tim
Mooney, Ron Erickson and Charles Vresilovic present. City staff in attendance:
Rebecca Schickling, Scott Chism, Parks Department; Chris Bendon, Nick Lelack:,
Joyce Ohlson, Community Development; Lee Novak, Housin ; Jackie Lothian,
Deputy City Clerlc.
t)KA-
\
PUBLIC HEARlNG:
SKATEBOARD PARK - RIO GRANDE SPA AMENDMENT
Bob Blaich opened the public hearing_ David Hoefer stated that the notice was
received and the commission had permission to proceed. Nick Lelack presented
the proposal for a 17,000 square foot depressed skateboard park to be located in
Rio Grande Park by Resolution #21. Lelack said the basketball courts would be
moved to an undeveloped area to the south. Lelack noted that site A was north of
the yellow line and the Skateboard Park would be located on Site B.
Lelack stated that P&Z and City Council approved the Rio Grande Master Plan in
1993 and that plan was a conceptual approval for the parlc. He said that any
development must go through a final 2-step SPA process (City P&Z and then City
Council). Lelack noted that there were no new lights approved for the park or any
new parking for the park. He said there would be a couple of new sani-lets until
the new Civic Center Master Plan was completed.
Scott Chism utilized a colored map for the different zones, the yellow band was the
20-foot buffer zone necessary for the potential future use of a transportation
corridor_ The green circle was the future site of the John Denver Memorial along
the river_ The skateboard area was along the park edge. Chism noted there were 4
basic skateboard areas: a plaza space for the park proper and seating area, the
walkway that accessed the general Park, basketball courts and skateboard park. He
said there was a beginner skate portion and then elements in the Skate Park which
become more difficult.
Rebecca Schickling noted that the transportation easement did include the possible
trolley line placement_ Roger Hunt stated that the entire Rio Grande Park was
transportation, which included the recycle and red area. Hunt said that buffer was
an indefinite boundary and he stated concern for the area being proposed in this
plan as a transportation corridor, that was not where the trolley would be but rather
on the south side ofthat buffer area. Chism said that the "red zone" triangle of
land was identified to be devoted to youth recreation (specifically for skateboard
and basketball). Hunt reiterated that the original basketball court could have a
1
r) " ()
ASPEN PLANNING oi ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 18.2000
corridor for the Trolley around it and this plan just filled in that area. Chism noted
that the proposed plan included all landscape and actual hard surface, which could
be part of the original corridor with a 20-foot boundary. Schickling distributed
drawings from the original master plan.
Ron Erickson asked if the skateboard park would be available for in-line skating
and if it would be snow-melted in the winter. Chism replied that in-line skaters
would be accommodated but the skateboard park would not be snow-melted.
Charles Vresilovic asked why the basketball courts were being moved. He asked
why the skateboard park wasn't realigned to accommodate the basketball courts.
Chism replied that they were trying to accommodate all the current uses with the
passive sections being the Theatre, John Denver Memorial and the trail. Chism
said the skate park would be a more active use than the basketball courts and noted
that the lines needed to be longer than the courts with a smoother surface.
Vresilovic asked if there would be fencing because of the hazards of the sport and
an area for bike racks. Chism replied that the existing grade would be used to their
benefit for the skate area and bike racks would be supplied.
Mooney asked where the observation area was located. Chism responded there
was a turf edge, street tree planting with a grass slope that went down 4 to 1; this
slope and edge would be a great seating area because of the view from above the
skate area. There was a significant beginner area with a significant deck space
under the trees. Mooney stated that he was not in favor of any kind of
commercialization of this area, no vendors. Schickling stated that there were no
plans for any vending activity in any of the parks.
Roger Haneman asked ifthe $100,000.00 in state lottery funds had any restrictions
placed on the use. Schickling replied that the state had placed no restrictions.
Chism responded that there were also private donations, they have made an
application for a GOCO grant and have general parks and recreation funds.
Buettow asked what after dark activities were planned. Chism and Schickling both
answered that there would not be any lights because lights would be in conflict
with the other park uses. Chism said this was daytime activity only.
Jasmine Tygre asked if the 17,000 square feet L-shaped in-ground park was the
entire park area or just the concrete portion. Chism replied that it was essentially
(plus or minus) the concrete area.
2
(""')
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
("")
APRIL 18.2000
Vresilovic asked ifthere was a drainage plan. Chism responded that drainage
would be accommodated with the engineering plan which included the landscape
areas. Roger Hunt asked how deep was the deepest bowl and if water analysis of
the area had been done. Chism answered it was about a 10 foot depth from ramp
to bottom. Schickling replied that a water analysis was done.
Jon Busch, public, stated that it appeared the trolley plan was not reviewed because
of the placement for the trolley barn; he said this plan, as it stood, eliminated the
trolley. Chism replied that the recycle center area was where the trolley barn was
to be located and the playing field area was to be for the terminal. Busch stated
concern for the trolley turn around in that area from an engineering standpoint.
Tammy Dawson, Theatre in the Park, stated concern for sidewalk that the patrons
used because it was being changed with this new development. Dawson wanted to
make sure that the walkway was designed to carry vehicles for set-design, stage
props and handicap access. Dawson said that noise was a concern during
performance times; she asked if it was possible to post signs for the performances
times. Schickling replied that the Skateboard Park was close to town with
enforcement if necessary and that signs could be posted. Dawson stated support
for the Skateboard Park but wanted to be assured that the park uses remain
compatible.
Alan Osborn, Theatre in the Park, said that they appreciated all the work done and
voiced concern for the entrance to the Theatre being in conflict with in-line skaters
on the path.
Mitch Haas, public, asked ifbikes would be allowed on the ramps in the Skate
Parle. Chism replied that the users would work out the uses.
Hunt stated that he did not want to see this go forward until he saw how the rails
would work. He said that he did not want to approve anything that might prevent
the rails from happening.
Erickson stated that he was a trolley lover, however he said that he had been a
trolley lover for 20 years and nothing has happened yet. He said that he did not
want any delay in this skate park because this was progress; the kids needed to get
out of downtown in a place designed for their use.
Tygre said the concern for the transit uses was valid because it was a matter of
public trust. Tygre noted that a piece of land purchased with .transit money was
supposed to be used for transit. She said that ifthe land was used for something
3
t"""\
ASPEN PLANNIN& '* ZONING COMMISSION
o
APRiL 18.2000
else then it needed to be more of a public process than just a P&Z meeting. Tygre
stated that the acquisition of this land was part open space and part transit funds;
she said that many worthy groups approached the city for space in the Rio Grande
park. Tygre stated that she was not sure that this was the best place for a
skateboard park, given the history ofthe Youth Center. She questioned taking an
area of a park and putting 17,000 square feet of concrete on it, even below grade,
as such a good idea. She said that from the land use planning area there were a lot
of questions to be answered and she said that she was not ready to make a decision
on this until those questions were answered.
Blaich asked, for the sake of public safety, where the Ambulance access would be
located. Chism replied it was the same access as the handicap use for the Theatre.
Mooney requested that a condition be added to include an overlay from the
existing master plan and a diagram from the existing conditions from the railway
and trolley designs, including the access. Mooney said that this would show no
encroachment and the priority for trolley and transportation facilities on this
property.
Hunt stated that even with that condition added he felt that it was premature to
approve this until it was shown that this could work.
Buettow asked since this was purchased with transportation money, could the
added condition include that transportation rights were primary to the recreational
rights, and if in the future the public wanted to place the trolley system on this
property, it had priority. Buettow said that if a study proved that the transportation
could not work with this plan, then the Skateboard Park would have to be taken
out.
Erickson stated that transportation rights are superior to recreation in this vicinity.
Blaich asked Parks to come back with a plan that shows that this will work with
the trolley, transportation and parks.
MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve the Specially Planned
Area Review to build a Skateboard Park and relocate the basketball
courts on Rio Grande Site B finding that all of the criteria have been
met and to adopt P&Z Resolution# 21-2000 with conditions: 1. All
prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect. 2.
Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained. 3. Currently, the
fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present basketball
courts. The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will allow for
the continuation of these demonstration classes. 4. The Applicant shall relocate
4
A
ASPEN PLANNING &I: ZONING COMMISSION
r)
~,' .,' " .. ..... .. " ., ,', ,. .... ....... ........ ,'0',.. .0" .d,',
APRIL 18.2000
the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric Department. 5. The
Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park. 6. A water spigot for the cleanout of the area
should be provided. It may be possible to use the irrigation lines if there is no
change in the back flow. 7. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets
during construction. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed
on site during construction. 8. Prior to Construction: a. The Applicant shall
obtain a tree removal permit for the removal oftrees on site. b. The Applicant
shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan for the site.
Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficilil to use the flood routing
concept which would control the water flow from drainage through depressions
in the landscaping. 9. The Applicant shall provide a Trolley System overlay on
the Rio Grande Park site plan to City Council, demonstrating how the proposed
skateboard park, basketball court, and landscaping would affect the potential
for a Trolley System. Transportation rights for Rio Grande Park shall be
superior to all other rights in the future. Tim Mooney second. Roll call
vote: Buettow, yes; Erickson, yes; Haneman, yes; Tygre, no; Hunt,
no; Mooney, yes; Blaich, yes. APPROVED 5-2.
Schiclding noted that the master plan stated that the group realized that there other
decision-making processes that could effect the development of the two sites. The
group knew that a valley wide rail system terminating at the Rio Grande,
ultimately a tri-county decision that could use a significant portion ofthe property.
Schickling stated that she felt that was an underlying presumption of the property.
Ohlson said the plans needed to be revised prior to council submittal and the
overlay would be shown at council.
5
~ .
n
County of Pitkin }
}
State of Colorado }
ss.
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT
TO ASPEN LAN]) USE REGULATIONS
SECTION 26.304.060(E)
I, 'Re-1)GCCA
5G-Il c..LL- I ,.,.J OJ
, being or representing an
Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice
requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following
manner:
1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S.
Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated
on the attached list, on the 2.5 day of -Arr: \ ' 200(L (which is 13. days prior to the public
hearing date of M.y fj, ;u,CO).
2. . By posting a sign in a 'conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from
the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 7"'" day
of A Dr; \ , 2001L to the -8- day of KJ4-y ,200.Q..., (Must be posted for at least
ten (10) full days before the hearj.ng date), A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto,
(Attach photograph here)
.
0-
Notary Public
~
~- ,-
~
r\
, ?
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: RIO GRANDE PARK FINAL SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA REVIEW
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, May 8,
2000 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p,m. before the Aspen City Council, Council
Chambers, City Hall, Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the City of Aspen
requesting approval of an amendment to the Rio Grande Park Specially Planned Area to
build a skateboard park. The property is legally described as a Block P, of the City and
Townsite of Aspen and is commonly known as Rio Grande Park. For further information,
contact Nick Lelack at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S.
Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5095, nickl@ci.asoen.CQ,us.
sIRachel E. Richards. Mavor
Aspen City Council
Published in the Aspen Times on April 22, 2000
City of Aspen Account
COULTER GAYLA W
PO BOX L3
ASPEN CO 81612
VIDAL C A
REAL ESTATE
855W
CARBO
FILlATES C/O
EER RD
LE C <l1623
f1
VIDAL C A
,...~
REAL E TATE AFFILIATES C/O
855 WOO DEER RD
CARBONDALE 81623
:;;"':>
RIVER P~.K K liNN i ASPEN CONDO ASSOC
730 E DUB~
ASP~Cb 8161'---
~
RIVE - ARK IN ASPEN CONDO ASSOC
730 E D
AS,?*CO 1611
. .
ALLEN DOUGLAS P
600 E HOPKINS STE 302
ASPEN CO 81611
MORSE JAMES A TRUST
107 SINCLAIR DR
MUSKEGON MI 49441
LARSON KARL G
LARSON M MADELEINE
POBOX 8207
ASPEN CO 81612
JEROME OFFICE ASPEN COMPANY LLC
201 N MILL ST STE 106
ASPEN CO 81611
201 NORTH MILL ASSOCIATES LLC 50%
KRABACHER FAMILY TRUST 50%
201 N MILL ST STE 201
ASPEN CO 81611
KLEIN HERBERT S
KLEIN MARSHA L AS JOINT TENANTS
201 N MILL ST STE 203
ASPEN CO 81611
KLEI HERBEf3,l"S
KLEIN . A L
201 N Mtti ST -E 203
Asr<N CO 81611
,-, .
/~
MORSE JAMES A TRUST 1/2 INT
107 SINCLAIR
MUSKEGAN MI 49441
ELDER NELS REINHARD ESTATE OF
ELDER JANET C
202 N MONARCH ST
ASPEN CO 81611
LARSON KARL G
LAR~ M t)6ADELEINE
P 0 BOX~______
AS~CO 81612
LARSON KAR~
LAR _ DELEINE
P 0 BQX8207
ASPE'N CO 8161
LARSON KARJ"G
LARS6I>IJy\- MADELEINE
P 0 BQlf82lJ7-...
ASP~ CO 81612
S & A EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SCOTT LARSON, GENERAL PARTNER
PO BOX 910
PEWANKEE WI 53072
GOLDSTEIN GERALD H & CHRISTINE S
PO BOX 2045
ASPEN CO 81612
LARSON KARL G
LARSON-M.c.MADEEEINE
P 0 BOX~
ASP5H'CO 81612
201 NORTH MILL ASSOCIATES LLC 50%
KRABACl:lER FAI';\lJ:'T TRUST 50%
201 N MILL~$Q01
Asp~--e6 81611 .
201 N TH MILL~SSOCIATES LLC 50%
KRABAC F'Jl:MIL Y TRUST 50%
201 N.MttC S TE 201
ASPEN CO 816
201 NORTH MILL ASSOCIATES LLC 50%
KRAB~. ILYTR. UST50%
201 N MI 2.01
ASPE CO 81611 -..
LARSON KARj,,)3
LARSl9/Il.M MADELEINE
POBOX8~
A~N CO 816't2
LAY KENNETH L & LINDA P
2121 KIRBY DR #137
HOUSTON TX 77019
VAN DEUSEN EDWARD B & DIANA J FAM
TRST
VAN DEUSEN EDWARD & DIANA
JEANITRUSTEES
233 N SPRING ST
ASPEN CO 81611
DRACO INC
A COLORADO CORPORATION
PO BOX 8904
ASPEN CO 81612
KL.EIN HERBERJ; S
KLE1J':t.tMRSHf>. L
201 NJMt[-s:):SUITE 203
ASPEN CO 816'M
GUPTA FAMILY ENTERPRISES LP
5711 S 86TH CIR
OMAHA NE 68127
ELDEN RICHARD & GAIL M
2430 LAKEVIEW AVE -#115
CHICAGO IL 60614
HOTEL JEROME ASSOCIATES L P
PARTNERSHIP
330 E MAIN ST
ASPEN CO 81611
GROSS GAIL M
2700 POST OAK BLVD #1670
HOUSTON TX 77056
CITY OF ASPEN
130SG~ST
ASPEN C081~
'/'
CITY~~
130S NAST
ASP N CO 611
CITY OF ASPEN
130 S~~ST
ASP~~11
PITKIN COUNTY
530 E MAIN ST STE 302
ASPEN CO 81611
ZUPANCIS LOUIS J & ROBERT L 1/2 INT
EA
540 E MAIN ST
ASPEN CO 81611
SCHAINUCK LEWIS I
5750 DOWNEY AVE STE 206
LAKEWOOD CA 90712-1468
FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES
700 E BLEEKER AVE
ASPEN CO 81611
SCHAINUCK U<WIS I
5750 D~Y AVE STE 206
LAKEWQOD C~712-1468
MURPHY GEORGE W
PO BOX 4146
ASPEN CO 81612
,-..,
f'.,
CITY OF ASPEN
130 S GALENA ST J
ASPEN CO 8~~
./
PITKIN COUNTY
530 E MAIN ST STE 302
ASPEN CO 81611
CITY OF A EN
130 S GALEN T
ASPEN Gf<Y8161
,#
LITTLE RIVER HOUSE LLLP
1873 S BELLAIRE ST #700
DENVER CO 80222
CITY OF SPEN,
130 S GAL-6T
ASPEN .,S9'1l1
B C S PROPERTIES
BASS HOWARD - C/O
PO BOX 5078
ASPEN CO 81612
WHIPPLE RALPH U & LYNNE C
855 GIBSON AVE
ASPEN CO 81611
OBERMEYER KLAUS F
PO BOX 130
ASPEN CO 81612
CITY OF ASPEN ,/
130 S GAL~91"
ASPEN CVf6~
CITY ~AS.~N
130 S ENA ST
ASPEJV'C 1611
SMITH GAlLEN B
PO BOX 241
SNOWMASS CO 81654
SCHAINUCK LEWIS I
5750 D~ AVE STE 206
LAKEW~1}A 90712-1468
/
CITY OF ASPEN
130SG~ST
ASPEN)~&81lm
BANKERS MORTGAGE INC
420 E MAIN ST
ASPEN CO 81611
.""
SCHA~CK LEWIS I
5750 DO~EY AVE STE 206
LA~OD ~.. 90712-1468
SCHAI~K UiWIS I
5750 DO Y AVE STE 206
LAKEw.gQD A 90712-1468
GALENA PLAZA LLC
MEYER LOWELL C/O
PO BOX 1247
ASPEN CO 81612
SCH=CK EWIS I
5750 DO. EY AVE STE 206
LAK~OD A 90712-1468
SCHAINUCK LEWIS I
5750 D~AVE STE 206
LAKEWOOD Cf>NlO712-1468
./
434 EAST MAIN LLC
408 AABC STE 202
ASPEN CO 81611
SCHAINUCK LEWIS I
5750 DO~EY AVE STE 206
LAKEWOO 90712-1468
/
OBERMEYER'KLAUS F
PO BO~O
ASPE,W"C0'81Q12
PITKIN COUNTY
530 E M'AlN,-SIT STE 302
ASPEN pCl"~
"" .
KALLENBERG JEFFREY D J UND 50%
INT .
KALLEN BERG SANDRA LUND 50% INT
401 MARKET ST STE 500
SHREVEPORT LA 71101
LANCASTER JOHN L 111
901 MAIN ST STE 6000
DALLAS TX 75202
DORAN RALPH
2600 WOODWARD WAY
ATLANTA GA 30305
BULKELEY RICHARD C & JULIE J
801 JOY ST
RED OAK IA 51566
LAMB DON Q JR
GILKERSON LINDA
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 5640 ELLIS
AVE ..
CHICAGO IL 60637
BORCHERTS ROBERT HAND
BORCHERTS HOLDE H
1555 WASHTENAW
ANN ARBOR MI 48104
KIDDER IRENE N TRUST M
3928 UNIVERSITY BLVD
DALLAS TX 75205
f':
SCHAINUCK \;.EWI~
5750 DOWNE~...STE 206
LAKEWOOD GA 9iif't1l.1468
..,,-'
OBERMEYER MARGARET H
PO BOX 7848
ASPEN CO 81612
HIGBIE FAMILY TRUST
C/O JOAN METCALF
729 E BLEEKER ST
ASPEN CO 81611
RIVER PARK IN ASPEN CONDO ASSOC
700 E MAIN ST
ASPEN CO 81611
BULKELEY RICHARDC & JULIE J
PO BOX 450
RED OAK IA 51566
MCCUTCHIN GENE P
14833 MIDWAY RD
DALLAS TX 75244
ARNOLD RICHARD S AND KATHRYN J
1405 OAK FOREST DR
ORMOND BEACH FL 32174'3407
. BAILEY MARCIA UNGREN
3215 TARRY HOLLOW DR
AUSTIN TX 78703
KOCH GAIL COTTINGHAM'
124 N SPRING ST
ASPEN CO 81611
(
. !
ALESA HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL LTD
KNEZEVICH RICHARD A - C/O
533 E HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN CO 81611
,n
BECKWITH DAVID E QUAL RES TRUST
1/21NT
C/O FOLEY & LARDNER
777 E WISCONSIN AVE
MILWAUKEE WI 53202
SQUIRES CARL E
C/O WALTER R OBERMEYER
490 ASPEN OAK DR
ASPEN CO 81611-2704
PITKIN COUNTY CAPTIAL LEASING
CORP
A COLORADO CORP
530 E MAIN ST
ASPEN CO 81611
FOSTER MARTHA LEE LIVING TRUST
5000 COAKLEY BAY #N2
CHRISTIANSTED VI 00820-4561
HEYS DONALD R
HEYS MARIE L
2495 ADARE
ANN ARBOR MI 48104
SHERMAN CAPITAL COMPANY
5840 E JOSHUA TREE LN .
PARADISE VALLEY AZ 85253
MAESTRANZI BART
1101 N WESTERN
PARK RIDGE IL 60068.
PRIOR SHARON M
PO BOX 656
ASPEN CO 81612
HUBBARD MICHAEL P
10503 SUNSET TERRACE
CLIVE IA 50325
HOLLAND AND HARTA
DAVIDSON J W ATTN
PO 80X 8749
DENVER CO 80201
HICKS GILBERT W & PATSY K
3674 WOODLAWN TERRACE PL
HONOLULU HI 96822
COPPOCK RICHARD P
PO 80X 44
DEXTER MI 48130
EMPHASYS SERVICES COMPANY
4400 N A1A #1002 S
HUTCHINSON ISLAND FL 34949
MANN KATHLEEN A 99%
PO BOX 2057
ASPEN CO 81612
GERSHMAN JOEL & ELAINE
120 N SPRING ST
ASPEN CO 81611
HOLL\NDAND.HART
DAVIDS~ J W ATTN
PO BOX 8749-....
DENVER CO 8b'201
LESSING GREGORY J
. 13506 TRAVOIS TRAIL
PARKER CO 80134
RKJR PROPERTIES LTD
C/O ROY J MONK ESQ - ONE GALLERIA
TWR
STE# 1880- 13355 NOEL RD- L B 8
DALLAS TX 75240-6653
HOL NO AND HART
DAVID -Jw ATTN
PO BO)(.87
DENlIER CO 8 01
r---.
REINGOLD R08ERT B INC
1187 COAST VILLAGE RD STE 1-116
MONTECITO CA 93108
8ERLlN JAMES & MADELINE L
22656 CARAVELLE CR
BOCA RATON FL 33433
HOLLAND ANDJoIART
DAVlbSQtWW ATTN
PO 13QX"B~
DENVER CO 811201
MARCHETTI JOSEPH A TRUSTEE
MARCHETTI FAMILY REVOCABLE
TRUST
1526 FOREST DRIVE
GLENVIEW IL 60025
MARASCO EMILY A AKA MEYER EMILY A
653261/2 RD
GRAND JUNCTION CO 81506
KESSLER SEPP H
KESSLER JANE JT TENANTS
600 E MAIN ST #210
ASPEN CO 81611
RYERSON PHOEBE MASSEY
PO 80X 4222
ASPEN CO 81612
BROUGH STEVE B
BROUGH DEBORAH A
599 TROUT LK DR
SANGER CA 93657
MCGAFFEY FAMILY & CO NO C
C/O JERE D MCGAFFEY
777 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3600
MILWAUKEE WI 53202
HOLTZ ABEL & FANA
169 E FLAGLER ST STE 1627
MIAMI FL 33131
~
I '.
SOMMER JOHN L
5094 A VENIDA HACIENDA
TARZANA CA 91356-4223
FALLIN PAT FINLEY
600 E MAIN ST #201
ASPEN CO 81611
FICKE CLARK
15 W ARRELLAGA ST #3
SANTA BARBARA CA 93101
GREENBERG DEAN
PO BOX 129
NEWPORT MN 55055
HURST ROBERT J
85 BROAD ST 22ND FLOOR
NEW YORK NY 10004
EISENSTAT ALBERT & CONSTANCE
358 WALSH RD
ATHERTON CA 94027
RIVER PARK IN ASPEN CONDO ASSOC
730 E DURANT
ASPEN CO 81611
AARON ROGER S & VIRGINIA A
45 BIRCHALL DR
SCARSDALE NY 10583-0000
VIDAL C A
C/O REAL ESTATE AFFILIATES
855 WOODEN DEER RD
CARBONDALE CO 81623
PARKS CAROL
200 NEWBURY ST
BOSTON MA 02116
GINSBURG FRANCES
PO BOX 9961
ASPEN CO 81612
STARN STANLEY JOSEPH
RIVER BLUFF TOWNHOMES C:7
155 LONE PINE RD
ASPEN CO 81611
DALY GLENN A
DALY CAROL CENTER
0155 LONE PINE RD C-11 RIVER BLUFF
TH
ASPEN CO 81611
CREEKSTONE ASPEN LLC
4545 POST OAK PL STE 100
HOUSTON TX 77027
MILL STREET VENTURE U:C
PO BOX 1112
CRESTED BUTTE CO 81224
PITKIN COUNTY
530 E MAIN ST STE 302
ASPEN CO 81611
PUPPY SMITH LLC
205 S MILL ST SUITE 301A
ASPEN CO 81611
GARWOOD, JANET
POST OFFICE BOX 3889
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
GARWOOD JANET
PLETTS SARAH A AS JT TENANTS
PO BOX 3889
ASPEN CO 81612
n
SCHULTZ RESIDENCE TRUST
3849 PASEO DEL CAMPO
PALOS VERDES ESTATES CA 90274
GINSBERG JEROME D
C/O LANSCO CORP
575 LEXINGTON AVE STE 1600
NEW YORK NY 10022
PITT MURRAY C
2000 TOWNCENTER STE 1350
SOUTHFIELD MI 48075
GUILTINAN JOHN F JR TRUSTEE
12 RUE DEAUVILLE
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
CITY OF ASPEN
130 S GALENA ST
ASPEN CO 81611
ROARING FORK VENTURES LLC
557 N MILLST
ASPEN CO 81611
LAY KENNETH L & L1NDAP
2121 KIRBYDF!#137
HOUSTON TX 77019
UHLHORN FLORENCE M
PO BOX 10832
ASPEN CO 81612
FULLER VICTORIA B
1949 W WABANSIA
CHICAGO IL 60622
t"""\
SYNERGY PARTNERSHIP (50%) AND
ROSTAD EILEEN (50%)
601 E HOPKINS AVE STE 103
ASPEN CO 81611
GINN JOHN C
PO BOX 256
ASPEN CO 81612
KASPAR ALEXANDER GARRETT
PO BOX 12061
ASPEN CO 81612
RICHMAN MARK I
26111 W 14 MILE RD STE LL4
FRNKLlN MI 48025
US POSTAL SERVICE
WESTERN REGION'
SAN BRUNO CA 94099
MOCKLlN PETER & MONICA M
PO BOX 807
ASPEN CO 81612
027
"
"
HEATH JESSE B JR
HEATH HETTA S
606 N SPRING ST
ASPEN CO 81611
CITY~SPEN ,....
130 S'G}; 8T
AS~CO 8161
MARTIN MICHAEL S
4150 IRVING PL
CULVER CITY CA 90232-2812
REIDSCROFT PARTNERSHIP
PO 80X 10443
ASPEN CO 81612
COLORADO PROPERTIES L TO
TEXAS L TO PARTNERSHIP
1011 N FRIO
SAN ANTONIO TX 78207
MILL STREET MILAGRO CORPORATION
A COLORADO CORPORATION
414 N MILL ST
ASPEN CO 81611
MILL STREET MILAGRO CORPORATION
A COLORAoo...c..ORPQRATION
414 N MILL ST__~
ASPEN CEr81611
--
MILL STREET MILAGRO CORPORATION
A COLO 0 CORp.QRATION
414NMILLS. "
ASPEN .C08161
~.
MILL STREET MILAGRO CORPORATION
A COLOAAOQ coRf:>ORATION
414 N MILL>8~.
ASPEN'tO 81611 "
MYRIN-FREEMAN LESLIE D
PMB 101 300 PUppy SMITH #203
ASPEN CO 81611
HODGSON PHILIP R
HODGSON PATRICIA H
212 N MONARCH ST
ASPEN CO 81611
.~,
FULLER VIC~TORIA B.
1949WWAB
CHICAGO IL 6
TEAGUE HENRY B
412 N MILL ST
ASPEN CO 81611
WIENER WILLIAM B JR
401 MARKETST#1110
SHREVEPORT LA 71101
CITY~ OF ASPEN
130 S LEN
ASPEN 00'81 'ft .~
~ .
CI1"'C~~P5~ -
130~.~~~
A~CO 81611
HOROWITZ JAMES M
110 E HALLAM SUITE 104
ASPEN CO 81611
MILL ST.~E.T MILA9~ CORPORATION
A COLO ..CORPORATION
41'4:.kM1tCST '"
ASPEN CO 81611 ~
YOUNG DENNIS & ANDREA
PO BOX 133
ASPEN CO 81612
VOLK, RICHARD W
SUITE 3600
5847 SAN FELIPE
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77057
SEYMOUR FAMILY TRUST
390 N SPRING ST
ASPEN CO 81611
------
, ,
FULLER VICTORIA B
1949~IA
CHICA~ 1ioo.22
MILL ST~T MI GRO CORPORATION
A COLORAD ORPORATION
414 NJ!ILbt' T "
ASPEN CO 81611
SHEFFER DOUGLAS & BARBARA
PO BOX 250
ASPEN CO 81612
MILL STREET MILAgi<O CORPORATION
A COLOR~ORPORATION
414 N M.'Jtsr '--"
ASPEN CO 81611
MILL STREET MILAGRO CORPORATION
A COL~,c;~PORATION
414 N MILL
ASPEfIlI'C'O 8161 .
MAYER HOWARD & PAULINE
PO BOX 333
ASPEN CO 81612
BROWN RUTH HAMILTON 20%
420 N SPRING ST
ASPEN CO 81611
225 N MILL ST LLC
A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY CO
225 N MILL ST
ASPEN CO 81611
VOLK SUE J FAMILY RESID TRUST 1/2
2327 MIMOSA DR
HOUSTON TX 70719
i~
1=
-~ ~
""
~~
~;
'"
{l
~
~O
..Q
'aJ
1$
~
~
o
=
(J)
c..
...~
~
('0'
.,.1
\;' .....4
~I>' c)~.~ t!::.9;h ..=i:O"'Ot:e()~ _S.151='te:
~ ~U- 00- .U_la'"O," -~~U
u ~ t; -l GO...."O . a) 3 u o.'S > Cl...e-.] 8 '0
~"~' u':8 0] a 8 tU~-~'a'a. ~'c::~...... 0-
S ~ ~ 5 ~ e ...... ..s 0 .... o.s a) ~ 5" ~ .g ~ ea ~
00. ..::g:~~ =o~lnrg-=xg-t:l-o'<"3 ~o..n~.9~
8. 0 .;!: e e'=l ~...... a) u "0 '- ~.,g g .-::; Il) ~ ~ ""'
o .,s ~ o.~ ~ ,~ fg ~ ~8. 0. :E-; -; u .,s ~ ~"8 ~
"'O'+<d-c:l" o,.c-o.....2 c.o;,..'-~ "'O~,,",.oS.
~oo.s.o~ >u~'-~~-o'GH~ e~.P"'OSo~.
I=< 00 ..0 ~ ._ 0 '- ;... Il) ~ ..... ''= 0 E, 0.... Ii) ':w
~ ~ ~ 'S '-!;: S "'0 ..s ~ a~ :9 gf e J:: 0 ~ r.I:J ~ U e:
v; VJ tf.l c:I ~ c: ~ t: c co ._ 0.. (l) :::s egg.....
~=t~o~ Q)~~Zi~~B~oE .e8~~os
u '" ~ ~ 0 & ;; ,- 0 0 x 0 g ".,s 0 c::: ,'" .... ~ 2
.g c: ~ "c ~ 0.-0 a ~ ~ ..... .c C5 Q) CIl 0 c: u ~ Q) "5 rn
~ .g ..s.g E ~ 'a e= ~ ~ 9 ~ d' ~ c.5 ~ S J; 8:"b1.s 6b ~ I
~~~~]~~~t;8~~~'-X]~dQ)r.l:Jd"'O'~~
.- i5 OJ)'~ ~..c: il ~ u..o - ,,"" > ~ q.a x ,g g S !l a.g 'is
g'-.c~M~..c::3~.~ea~io'-8-~~._E~ ~~
::l C" c: Ulolool"IIl-B~-5..o 5cictt:l$o~5-
f:Lg.g :s ~ C2 :a 8.~ e g. ~ ~ 8 ~.g ~.s a ~.~
:t:lo~~ 1Gc~~ ll)o.ob.O~ "'O:;~~ ~rJl}~.,s"oS
o ::::l ~ "'C .- (l,j == ~ c C..o ., ..0'- ~ ~ "'" u
u j::. ~ ai ~ ~ ~ Ii . ~ 'C '6 : ... 0 Q.. .n ~ > C
~~o:""o ~~]~~~~ti.~ &~C~ E~O~~
"'" ~ .S (l,j a.n ~ 0 t) rJ:J 0..= ~ 'C ~ (l,j] ~ -
Cu~_ ~~~O(l,j~~.n(l,j ~g~~ s~ 0
~-2~ 'R.n'S~~~~u~ ~a~~ lE.5~~
0..2 ~ E (\,) ~ ~ ~ 1:: - (l,j oS (l,j .~ ~ ..... ~ .~ ..s::".-.a 0..
.n:: ~(l,j ~ uu:::l:":.n .c: UUO~ ~_:::l""
~o~~ c~.n~o~:::l~~ .~co..~ ='~.~-h
~.c.nQ.. (l,jU~ u UC(l,j~~o ~ ....~ ~_
~~ (l,j Ei~u_c>~~'~ou~o ~_ ti~
~ 5 ~ ~ ~:_.s ea ti.~ ~ ~ .n ~ ~ 0.0 ~ ~ e !]
'n ~ (\,)] E~::u.s ~ ~ a a fr.z:f 8..g ~ C:t (\,) ~ ~
O~>- o~.no~o(\,) .n~(\,) ~~ u~$o ~
~u~.= u c.oI>~~ou~~Q.n .0- ~
bfJ-FJ.c u o.g.g ~.D''= ~ a ~.. .~ a E E - c:a a 0 '-
c ~ .n ..... c.:: c::..s ~ 0 u.....:-.5 0 (\,) P :-= 0 I.+-<'C 0
._ (1) ~::i I... ~ -;> \1,) Q)..o :> ..-. . - ~ 11)
"'C - UL.. OiUb!J~iUL.,-g.Dgl.+-<~ ~'':~b!J
S o:S~ 6 ~ ~(E.O -i t: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~::6 ~ ~ 8 E g e ~..5 b!J.5
g ~ ~ ......0 0 o,..,~ ~.c...,.l O)~ ~ = ~~. iU i':S ~ c= C C
..(.~ Q -6~.9.s ~ - =':;?".~ ---g.; t- ~ ~:g E ~ Q.. ='5...5
o.g e 0 CJ .s'~ ~ ~ .s ~ i oS ~ c..~ .s .i ~ E
Q)~
.!:2(j)
'0 .-
_.s::
::l+-'
0=
UO
~...
.- 0
= +-'
u>-
~-g
. ~.
c ~ :: .. rJ'i 1: ..!.. ..cJ"o. >'0 J;s.9 .:::: ~ C;l S
& ~....: 0 'S: OJ) ll>> '^ 0 g c::: 'S '".... p
...8 '" & ,"'il E"8 i5 0._ ~ ..o..c: ~.,::
< ~ ~ ~Cl _ 0.0 E r- ~ ~ ~ C=:-5 ..
~] ~..c: 0 ~ 'E ~:: '2""" -0 ~ ~ 5 ~
~.ncJ"o.~=rJ:J~>rJ'i~c=~8 ,=E~>
e~~~~~e~~:::ll.+-<~= 'i~a~
0.0 Q S e v.: ..... - 0 a ~ _ OIJ=
~ :=! 8 l.;:; aJ S ~;S 5 'Oo..-B ~ :-= .5 ':::l
tl ";l -.n.;!3.~ 0 .0 = C U a: ~ ~ us .
'D.O'~ > ~.. ~ oS a: ':?f ~.9 ~ 6.g] ~ 0...:= ~ _' .
!Sot e1:! 0 1l..8:;;;'- gj,1l U !S..8ll --oo:i i>'" t!
.c::t::: ~]! ~v.: B C;l"g.5'n.s'= B~. a: >if:~ a
U~~c08]~~~~ ~~~ 2~o ~
~~~~~~rJ:Jcie~~8~.a~~]]~~
__u !l-~? -- ~,,~ o";:>~
i.5 '-= 5 ~ QIJ ~ 15 "'C r~ 'S "0 8 c 0.. ~ ~ ~a ~
fij~ '€ 8 8 ~ ~ ~ a .9 ~ tj ~ ~ ~..g ~ ~ e..8 ~
III ~ ~ o-l!; ,. --0." ~ . = j Eo ~ 0 a ~.Q & %j'5l,'
~~ u ~ .~~ ~.s~ ~?l.go .8.s..~JJ"
r'1 ,....,
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING coMMISSION
,~'tne. \'1 ~
, I,:>:,.
APRIL 18.2000
..
Bob Blaich opened the special meeting at 4:30 p.m. in the Sister Cities Meeting
Room with Jasmine Tygre, Roger Hunt, Roger Haneman, Steven Buettow, Tim
Mooney, Ron Erickson and Charles Vresilovic present. City staff in attendance:
Rebecca Schickling, Scott Chism, Parks Department; Chris Bendon, Nick Lelack,
Joyce Ohlson, Community Development; Lee Novak, Housin ; Jackie Lothian,
Deputy City Clerk.
PUBLIC HEARING:
~
\
SKATEBOARD PARK - RIO GRANDE SPA AMENDMENT
Bob Blaich opened the public hearing. David Hoefer stated that the notice was
received and the commission had permission to proceed. Nick Lelack presented
the proposal for a 17,000 square foot depressed skateboard park to be located in
Rio Grande Park by Resolution #21. Lelack said the basketball courts would be
moved to an undeveloped area to the south. Lelack noted that site A was north of
the yellow line and the Skateboard Park would be located on Site B.
Lelack stated that P&Z and City Council approved the Rio Grande Master Plan in
1993 and that plan was a conceptual approval for the park. He said that any
development must go through a final 2-step SPA process (City P&Z and then City
Council). Lelack noted that there were no new lights approved for the park or any
new parking for the park. He said there would be a couple of new sani-Iets until
the new Civic Center Master Plan was completed.
Scott Chism utilized a colored map for the different zones, the yellow band was the
20-foot buffer zone necessary for the potential future use of a transportation
corridor. The green circle was the future site of the John Denver Memorial along
the river. The skateboard area was along the park edge. Chism noted there were 4
basic skateboard areas: a plaza space for the park proper and seating area, the
walkway that accessed the general Park, basketball courts and skateboard park. He
said there was a beginner skate portion and then elements in the Skate Park which
become more difficult.
Rebecca Schickling noted that the transportation easement did include the possible
trolley line placement. Roger Hunt stated that the entire Rio Grande Park was
transportation, which included the recycle and red area. Hunt said that buffer was
an indefinite boundary and he stated concern for the area being proposed in this
plan as a transportation corridor, that was not where the trolley would be but rather
on the south side of that buffer area. Chism said that the "red zone" triangle of
land was identified to be devoted to youth recreation (specifically for skateboard
and basketball). Hunt reiterated that the original basketball court could have a
I
r'1
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
,1""1
,. ,:,J
APRIL 18.2000
'--
~
corridor for the Trolley around it and this plan just filled in that area. Chism noted
that the proposed plan included all landscape and actual hard surface, which could
be part of the original corridor with a 20-foot boundary. Schickling distributed
drawings from the original master plan.
Ron Erickson asked if the skateboard park would be available for in-line skating
and ifit would be snow-melted in the winter. Chism replied that in-line skaters
would be accommodated but the skateboard park would not be snow-melted.
Charles Vresilovic asked why the basketball courts were being moved. He asked
why the skateboard park wasn't realigned to accommodate the basketball courts.
Chism replied that they were trying to accommodate all the current uses with the
passive sections being the Theatre, John Denver Memorial and the trail. Chism
said the skate park would be a more active use than the basketball courts and noted
that the lines needed to be longer than the courts with a smoother surface.
Vresilovic asked if there would be fencing because of the hazards of the sport and
an area for bike racks. Chism replied that the existing grade would be used to their
benefit for the skate area and bike racks would be supplied.
Mooney asked where the observation area was located. Chism responded there
was a turf edge, street tree planting with a grass slope that went down 4 to I; this
slope and edge would be a great seating area because of the view from above the
skate area. There was a significant beginner area with a significant deck space
under the trees. Mooney stated that he was not in favor of any kind of
commercialization of this area, no vendors. Schickling stated that there were no
plans for any vending activity in any ofthe parks.
Roger Haneman asked if the $100,000.00 in state lottery funds had any restrictions
placed on the use. Schickling replied that the state had placed no restrictions.
Chism responded that there were also private donations, they have made an
application for a GOCO grant and have general parks and recreation funds.
Buettow asked what after dark activities were planned. Chism and Schickling both
answered that there would not be any lights because lights would be in conflict
with the other park uses. Chism said this was daytime activity only.
Jasmine Tygre asked if the 17,000 square feet L-shaped in-ground park was the
entire park area or just the concrete portion. Chism replied that it was essentially
(plus or minus) the concrete area.
2
f""\ !~
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISStbN APRIL 18.2000
c..
..
Vresilovic asked if there was a drainage plan. Chism responded that drainage
would be accommodated with the engineering plan which included the landscape
areas. Roger Hunt asked how deep was the deepest bowl and if water analysis of
the area had been done. Chism answered it was about a IO foot depth from ramp
to bottom. Schickling replied that a water analysis was done.
Jon Busch, public, stated that it appeared the trolley plan was not reviewed because
of the placement for the trolley barn; he said this plan, as it stood, eliminated the
trolley. Chism replied that the recycle center area was where the trolley barn was
to be located and the playing field area was to be for the terminal. Busch stated
concern for the trolley turn around in that area from an engineering standpoint.
Tammy Dawson, Theatre in the Park, stated concern for sidewalk that the patrons
used because it was being changed with this new development. Dawson wanted to
make sure that the walkway was designed to carry vehicles for set-design, stage
props and handicap access. Dawson said that noise was aconceli1 during
performance times; she asked if it was possible to post signs for the performances
times. Schickling replied that the Skateboard Park was close to town with
enforcement if necessary and that signs could be posted. Dawson stated support
for the Skateboard Park but wanted to be assured that the park uses remain
compatible.
Alan Osborn, Theatre in the Park, said that they appreciated all the work done and
voiced concern for the entrance to the Theatre being in conflict with in-line skaters
on the path.
Mitch Haas, public, asked if bikes would be allowed on the ramps in the Skate
Park. Chism replied that the users would work out the uses.
Hunt stated that he did not want to see this go forward until he saw how the rails
would work. He said that he did not want to approve anything that might prevent
the rails from happening.
Erickson stated that he was a trolley lover, however he said that he had been a
trolley lover for 20 years and nothing has happened yet. He said that he did not
want any delay in this skate park because this was progress; the kids needed to get
out of downtown in a place designed for their use.
Tygre said the concern for the transit uses was valid because it was a matter of
public trust. Tygre noted that a piece of land purchased with transit money was
supposed to be used for transit. She said that if the land was used for something
3
,,...,,,
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
f")
APRIL 18. 2000
'--
else then it needed to be more of a public process than just a P&Z meeting. Tygre
stated that the acquisition of this land was part open space and part transit funds;
she said that many worthy groups approached the city for space in the Rio Grande
park. Tygre stated that she was not sure that this was the best place for a
skateboard park, given the history of the Youth Center. She questioned taking an
area of a park and putting 17,000 square feet of concrete on it, even below grade,
as such a good idea. She said that from the land use planning area there were a lot
of questions to be answered and she said that she was not ready to make a decision
on this' until those questions were answered.
Blaich asked, for the sake of public safety, where the Ambulance access would be
located. Chism replied it was the same access as the handicap use for the Theatre.
Mooney requested that a condition be added to inclu,de an overlay from the
existing master plan and a diagram from the existing conditions from the railway
and trolley designs, including the access. Mooney said that this would show no
encroachment and the priority for trolley and transportation facilities on this
property.
Hunt stated that even with that condition added he felt that it was premature to
approve this until it was shown that this could work.
Buettow asked since this \Vas purchased with transportation money, could the
added condition include that tr:l~sportation rights were primary to the recreational
rights, and if in the future the public wanted to place the trolley system on this
property, it had priority. Buettow said that if a study proved that the transportation
could not work with this plan, then the Skateboard Park would have to be taken
out.
Erickson stated that transportation rights are superior to recreation in this vicinity.
Blaich asked Parks to come back with a plan that shows that this will work with
the trolley, transportation and parks.
MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve the Specially Planned
Area Review to build a Skateboard Park and relocate the basketball
courts on Rio Grande Site B finding that all of the criteria have been
met and to adopt P&Z Resolution# 21-2000with conditions: 1. All
prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect. 2.
Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained. .3. Currently, the
fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present basketball
courts. The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will allow for
the continuation of these demonstration classes. 4. The Applicant shall relocate
4
~
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
,/"'l
APRIL 18.2000
1,..
the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric Department. 5. The
Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park, 6. A ",liter spigot for the cleanout of the area
should be provided. It may be possible to use the irrigation lines if there is no
change in the back flow. 7. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets
during construction, A.",ashe~ roc_korot~~r style mud rack must be installed
on site during construction. 8. Prior to Construction: a. The Applicant shall
obtain a tree removal permit for the removal oitrees on site. b. The Applicant
shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan for the site.
Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficial to use the flood routing
concept which would control the water flow from drainage through depressions
in the landscaping. 9. The Applicant shall provide a Trolley System overlay on
the Rio Grande Park site plan to City Council, demonstrating how the proposed
skateboard park, basketball court, and landscaping would affect the potential
for a Trolley System. Transportation rights for Rio Grande Park shall be
superior to all other rights in the future. Tim Mooney second. Roll call
vote: Buettow, yes; Erickson, yes; Haneman, yes; Tygre, no; Hunt,
no; Mooney, yes; Blaich, yes. APPROVED 5-2.
Schickling noted that the master plan stated that the group realized that there other
decision-making processes that could effect the development of the two sites. The
group knew that a valley wide rail system terminating at the Rio Grande,
ultimately a tri-county decision that could use a significant portion of the property.
Schickling stated that she felt that \Vas an underlying presumption of the property.
Ohlson said the plans needed to be revised prior to council submittal and the
overlay would be shown at council.
5
MEMORANDUM
?
,
.
"
THRU:
Steve Barwick, City Manager
John Worcester, City Attorney
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director
#,
i>>
,~A
tf \~ ,~
eft'
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Nick Lelack, Planner
RE:
Specially Planned Area Review to Build a Skateboard Park and to
Relocate the Basketball Court on Rio Grande Park, Site B - Second
Readin~ublic Hearing
DATE:
May 8, 2000
SUMMARY: The proposal is to build a 17,000 square foot depressed skateboard park where
the basketball court currently exists and to build a new bask~tball court in the undeveloped
area shown in the photograph to the right. The Planning and Zoning Commission
recommended approval by a 5 to 2 vote on April 18, Please see Exhibit B for an aerial photo.
ApPLICANT:
City Parks Department
ZONING:
Public, Specially Planned Area Overlay
REPRESENTATIVES:
Rebecca Shickling, City Parks Deputy Director
Scott Chism, City Parks Planner
LOCATiON:
Rio Grande Park, Site B
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Final Specially Planned Area (SP Ai Review: This two step process requires approval of a
development plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, with public
hearings occurring at both. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend
approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval to the City Council. The Rio Grande
master plan was developed as a conceptual SPA Plan. Following its adoption, new
development or significant alterations must be consistent with this conceptual SPA plan and
be reviewed pursuant to the final SPA development review process.
1
t""'\
r-.
. f
STAFF COMMENTS:
The City of Aspen Parks Deparment, ("Applicant"), represented by Scott Chism, Parks
Planner, is requesting approval of a Specially Planned Area Review to build a
skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B. City
Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission endorsed the Rio Grande Master Plan
in 1993.
Rio Grande Park is divided into two (2) sites, Site A and Site B. Site A is located
between the bike path and row oflarge Cottonwoods that edge the playing field, and the
river. It also includes the snow melter and the drainage pond closest to Mill Street. Site
B encompasses the recycle site, access road to Site A, the triangle of open space between
the access road and bike/pedestrian path, and the playing field. It is bordered by Rio
Grande Drive, Mill Street, and a row of Cottonwoods and the bike/pedestrian path to the
. north, The proposed skateboard park would be located on Site B in the open space
triangle, which currently contains a basketball court and open space.
The Master Plan outlines re<;ommended land uses/aptivities for Site B.. A half-pipe
skateboard ramp is identified as one of the activities intended for this parcel (page
16). Although the proposed skateboard park is larger than a half-pipe ramp, the proposed
skateboard park is consistent with the Master Plan and conceptual review. Specifically,
the Plan's Recommend.ed. A<;tions for Site B include the following actions:
. The City should work with the Youth Center to development more recreational
activities on Site B.
. The Youth Center and the City should install a half-pipe skateboard ramp in the open
space between the recycle facility and the playing field.
Site B is relatively flat, and contains stable soils and no utilities other than an existing
electrical line.
Site B is a relatively small area that will be incorporated into the overall Civic Center
Master Plan, scheduled to be completed by late autumn. The Civic Center Master Plan
will address a permanent location for restroom facilities.for this area. Currently, seasonal
san-o-lets are located in the park near the theater. This proposal includes the provision of
two more san-o-let enclosures for all park users. In addition, public restrooms are located
across Rio Grande Place in the parking garage and at the Youth Center.
Key skateboard park elements include the following:
. The centerpiece of the proposal is a 17,000 square foot, "L-shape," in-ground,
concrete skateboard park containing areas for all skill levels. Building concrete
structures below the natural grade would minimize the noise and visual impacts of
the skateboard park.
. The basketball court would be relocated to the north with better sun exposure.
. The existing drinking fountain would be relocated to the plaza space; the plaza
space would serve as the park entry,
2
t""\
,..-.
~.1
. A 35-foot buffer zone south of the Rio Grande Trail would be created, exceeding
the 20- foot buffer zone outlined in the master plan.
. No new parking spaces would be created,
. No new lights would be added to the park.
The City Council should also be aware that any future rail or trolley facility would be
located in the playing field area to the west as identified in the Master Plan,
On April 18, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 2 to recommend that
City Council approve the Specially Planned Area Review for the skateboard park
with conditions, A draft of the meeting minutes from this hearing are attached as
Exhibit C. A couple of Commissioners and one member of the public, John Bush,
raised concerns over how the proposed development of the new skateboard park,
relocated basketball court, and landscaping would affect the development of a Trolley
System (tracks and poles, car barn facility, trolley cars, etc.). Specifically, these
members opposed the application because the site plan did not indicate how a Trolley
System could function on this site juxtaposed to the skateboard park and basketball
court; therefore, they did not believe they could make an informed decision,
Other Commissioners explained that, although they have long supported the concept of
a Trolley System, no development plans for it have been proposed and may not be
proposed for the next 10, 20, or even 50 years. These members stated that they do not
want this application delayed because it will provide an immediate, needed recreation
amenity for the community's youth, These members strongly support the application.
The Commission approved a recommendation that the Parks Department provide a
Trolley System overlay on the site plan for Council's review. The Commission also
recommends that transportation rights for the park be superior to all other rights in the
future. The Trolley System overlay will be presented to City Council at the public
hearing for this application on May 8.
Staff does not believe a condition recognizing the superiority of transportation rights
for the park is necessary for two (2) reasons. First, Parks Department Staff contends
that the proposed skateboard park, relocated basketball court and landscape plan have
been designed in a manner that respects any future transportation/trolley uses for the
park.
Second, the Rio Grande Master Plan states that, "Because the site was purchased with
'J'h Penny Transportation funds, the basis of future development goals is
transportation oriented." Therefore, transportation uses of the park shall remain the
priority use.
It should be noted that the Rio Grande Master Plan does not designate a Trolley System
as the designated use for the park; rather, it lists the system as one possible use. The
first recommendation in the Recommended Actions for SiteB is the following: The
City of Aspen should decide whether a City-wide trolley system is appropriate in
3
r-,
~
Aspen. This decision has not yet been made and will likely be further explored as part of
the Civic Center Master Plan.
Community Development Staff supports the proposed skateboard park development
because it (1) meets the review criteria, (2) provides an important community
recreation facility, and (3) would be designed in a manner that minimizes its overall
impact on the park, the neighborhood, and respects the transportation use options that
have been contemplated through the years for this site.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval of the Specially Planned Area Review to build
a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park,
Site B, with the following conditions:
1, All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect.
2. Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained.
3. Currently, the fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present
basketball courts. The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will allow
for the continuation of these demonstration classes.
4. The Applicant shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric
Department.
5. The Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park.
6. A water spigot for the cleanout of the area should be provided. It may be possible to
use the irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow,
7. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction. A washed rock
or other style mud rack must be installed on site during construction.
8. Prior to Construction:
a. The Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for the removal of trees on site.
b. The Applicant shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan for
the site. Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficial to use the flood
routing concept which would control the water flow from drainage through
depressions in the landscaping,
e{. ~ ~ ~ l.z9- o..p(J~~ ~ ~;1aIr!4-JR.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Ordinance No, 14, Series of 2000, the Specially Planned Area Review to
build a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B."
4
r-.,
r)
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings
Exhibit B Aerial Photograph of Rio Grande Park
Exhibit C -- Draft Meeting Minutes from the April 18, 2000, Planning and
Zoning Commission Public Hearing
C:\home\nickl\Active Cases\Rio Grand SPA Skateboard Park Amendment\CC.Public Hearing.doc
5
r'\
r1
, J
EXHIBIT A
RIO GRANDE SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA REVIEW
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
26.440.050. Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA).
In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final
development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider
. the following:
1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the
mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use,
density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space.
Staff Finding
Staff believes the proposed skateboard park is compatible with and enhances the mix of
development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height,
bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. The proposed development would be
located in the Rio Grande Park. The skateboard park would enhance the mix of
recreation activities in and around the park, which include a large playing field,
basketball court, bike/pedestrian paths, and fly fishing in the Roaring Fork River.
A wide-range of land uses exist in the immediate vicinity, including civic, institutional,
commercial, office, recreational, retail, and light industrial uses, This development would
add to the eclectic mix of uses in and around the area.
The proposal is to build depressed concrete structures, The height, bulk and architecture
are compatible with the park and its surroundings. Landscaping will be provided to
create a "canopy effect" around the depressed structures, and open space will be
maintained to the greatest extent practicable.
A half-pipe skateboard ramp is identified as one of the activities intended for this parcel
in the Rio Grande Master Plan. Although the proposed skateboard consists of more
structures than a half-pipe ramp, the structures are depressed, The proposed development
is consistent with the Rio Grande Master Plan and conceptual review approval. This
criterion is addressed.
2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the
proposed development.
Staff Finding
Adequate roads exist to service the proposed skateboard park. Access to this park feature
is provided by Rio Grande Place as well as the stairs connecting Rio Grande Place to
Galena Street. RFT A and the Galena Street Shuttle service this area.
I
t""\
(1
Currently, seasonal san-o-lets are located in the park near the theater. This proposal
includes the provision oftwo more san-o-let enclosures for all park users. In addition,
public restrooms are located across Rio Grande Place in the parking garage and Youth
Center. The Civic Center Master Plan will address a permanent location for restroom
facilities for this area.
The existing drinking fountain would be relocated to a new plaza serving as the park's
entrance. An existing conduit, or electrical line, would be relocated as part of this
development. Parking impacts are not expected to be significant since the nature of
skateboarding is transportation and recreation; it is likely that skateboarders will arrive at
the park on their skateboaJ,"ds, by bus, or on foot. This criterion is addressed,
3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for
development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of
mudjlow, rockfalls, avalanche dangers andjlood.hazards.
Staff Finding
Staff believes Site B is suitable for the development of a skateboard park. The
Applicant has stated that the soils are stable and has provided a Geo-technical report
documenting this finding, This site is not susceptible to mud flow, rock falls,
avalanche dangers, or flood hazards. This criterion is met.
4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning
techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental
impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the
project and the public at large.
StaffFinding
Staff believes the proposed development employs exceptional land planning techniques
in this design. Depressing the concrete structures preserves all view planes, avoids
adverse environmental impacts, and minimizes potential visual and noise impacts, The
design also preserves open space, trails, and all park amenities for users and the public at
large. In addition, the basketball court would be relocated to maximize sun exposure, and
new park amenities would be provided, including the skateboard park and more san-o-
lets, And, the provision of a 35-foot buffer from the Rio Grande Trail exceeds the 20-
foot recommendation in the Master Plan, Further, the proposal provides structures for
skateboarders of all levels, and separates the beginners from the experts for safety and
enjoyment reasons. This criterion is met.
5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen
Area Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Finding
Although the AACP does not address expanding recreational opportunities in town, the
location of the proposed skateboard park is consistent with many AACP goals. For
. example, the park is located in the center of town, making it accessible by alternative
2
r'1
(""'\
/
modes of transportation such as by bus, bike, skateboard, or on foot. The plan also calls
for creating mixed use developments, and this park will enhance the variety of land uses
that already exist on Rio Grande Park and in the immediate vicinity. Staff believes this
criterion is addressed.
6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of
excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the
surrounding neighborhood.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive
public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood,
City Council has appropriated funds for all aspects of the project out of the Parks
Department budget. This criterion is addressed,
7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20)
percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section
26.445.040(B)(2).
Staff Finding
The slopes do not exceed 20%; this criterion is not applicable.
8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed
development.
Staff Finding
No GMQS allotments are required for this project; this criterion is not applicable.
3
I)
A
ORDINANCE NO.
(SERIES OF 2000)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO, APPROVING THE SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA REVIEW TO
BUILD A SKATEBOARD PARK AND TO RELOCATE THE EXISTING
BASKETBALL COURT ON RIO GRANDE PARK, SITE B, CITY OF ASPEN,
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2737-073-06-851
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the City of Aspen Parks Department for a Specially Planned Area Review to build a
skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B; and,
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 42, Series of 1993 approved the Rio
Grande Master Plan; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rio Grande Master Plan and applicable provisions
of the Municipal Code, development review for site specific projects for the Rio Grande
parcels shall be reviewed through the Specially Planned Area development review; and,
WHEREAS, the Rio Grande Master Plan identifies a half-pipe skateboard ramp
can be located on Rio Grande Park, Site B; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.440 of the Land Use Code, City Council
may approve a Specially Planned Area Review during a duly noticed public hearing after
considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a
duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from
the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral
agencies; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 18, 2000, the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a five to two (5-2) vote, approval of
a Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball
court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, with conditions contained herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City
Water Department, City Engineering, and the Community Development Department
reviewed the Project and recommended approval with conditions; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development
proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has
reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the
Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and
considered public comment at a public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds
all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal,
with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community
Plan; and,
i"""'\
A
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for
the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1
The Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to relocate the
basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, is approved with the following conditions:
I. All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect.
2. Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained.
3, Currently, the fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present
basketball courts. The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will
allow for the continuation of these demonstration classes.
4. The Applicant shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric
Department.
5. The Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park.
6. A water spigot for the cleanout of the area should be provided. It may be possible
to use the irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow.
7. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction. A washed
rock or other style mud rack must be installed on site during construction,
8, Prior to Construction:
a. The Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for the removal of trees on site.
b, The Applicant shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan
for the site. Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficial to use the
flood routing concept which would control the water flow from drainage
through depressions in the landscaping.
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
doclUllentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as iffully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
~ P _O,L.
C1.. ",^,<--- M,lh~ bl..U.U prof~~ ~.~
~~
<
,-"
n
Section 3:
This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Section 5:
A duly noticed public hearing on this Ordinance was held on the 8th day of May, 2000, at
5:00 in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law,
. by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 24th day of April, 2000.
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
Rachel Richards, Mayor
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 8th day of May, 2000.
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
Rachel Richards, Mayor
Approved as to form:
John Worcestor, City Attorney
.~
"
"":'"
:::f..
R
A
Specially Planned Area
Development Review
Rio Grande
Skateboard Park
Submitted to: Community Development Department
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Applicant: City of Aspen Parks Department
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Date: March 9,2000
"
t")
(j
...,"'-"".:
.,";'" ,~,;:"
,., 'j'\.
'?;,:,.:.,:",., ",;);',;d:]'
Scott Chism
City of Aspen Parks Department
544-3175 (direct)
THE CITY OF ASPEN
March 14, 2000
Nick Lelack
City of Aspen Community Development Departlnent
. 130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Nick,
We thank you for the opportunity to submit this Specially Planned Area Development Review for the
Rio Grande Skateboard Park. The Aspen Parks Department has the mission to construct at least 30
new parks and open space projects within the next three years, One of those projects is the Rio
Grande Skateboard Park located in Rio Grande Park. The Parks Department is proposing
development of a 17,000+ square foot in-ground concrete skateboard park to meet an unmet
recreational need identified by the youth, young adults and parents of the City of Aspen,
,
Rio Grande Park currently has a Public/SPA underlying zone district on the parcel and no variations
are being proposed'. Development of the skateboard park will occur this year, Construction is
scheduled to begin mid-May (weather pennitting) and to be completed by early September. Overlot
grading activities will be occurring in May and the beginning of June which will be followed by
approximately six (6) of concrete fonning, pouring and fmishing. Landscape work will occur in late
July.
No public restroom facilities exist presently at Rio Grande Park. This project will introduce two (2)
San-O-Let enclosures that will provide restrooms for all of the park uses including the skateboard
park. The San-O-Let enclosures will be similar in design to the enclosure at Herron Park, a three
sided timber frame structure, Parking impacts will be minimal due to the nature of the activity. The
skateboard park will be no different than the other public recreational uses that are currently located at
Rio Grande Park. Currently parking for Rio Grande Park is available along Rio Grande Place and at
the public parking garage. Public trail access is being maintained along the Rio Grande Trail and the
lower "jail trail," used to reach the Theatre in the Park.
City Council approved the 1993 Rio Grande Conceptmil Master Plan, which outlines development of
a skateboard area to provide increased recreational activities in the park. The skateboard park is being
proposed on the parcel that was identified in the Master Plan for such a' use -
(skateboard/basketballlyouth recreation),
One. of the the goals of the Master Plan states, "retain and optimize park/recreational uses in this area
130 SoUTH GALENA STREET. AsPEN, COLORADO 81611 . PHONE 970.920.5000 . FAX 970.920.5197
Printed on lWcyded paper
~,
~
i ".
"
and replace the active park and playfield only with a regional rail facility." Any future rail facility
will be located in the playing field area as identified in the Master Plan (west of the proposed
skateboard site). The Parks Department has developed a plan for the site that provides a 35' -0" buffer
zone south of the Rio Grande Trail which exceeds the 20' -0" buffer zone outlined in the Master Plan,
The buffer zone has been planned in order to protect the open space located to the north (John Denver
Sanctuary) and to "provide site development flexibility for Site B" (land parcel south of Rio Grande
Trail) The Parks Department has designed a larger buffer zone to accommodate the potential of
future rail lines.
The public has identified a recreational need for Aspen to have a place for skateboarding to occur that
is acceptable to the users, police and local businesses. City Council has identified a central area
located in a city park that is ideal for a skateboard park. City Council has also recently appropriated
$50,000 in city funds and $100,000 in state lottery funds to construct a skateboard park. The Parks
Department is committed to building this project for the community of Aspen, We request your
support and approval for the Rio Grande Skateboard Park.
Sincerely,
S~
Scott Chism, RLA
City of Aspen Parks Planner
r'\
f~
SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT
Rio Grande Park - Proposed Skateboard Park
A; General
1. Compatible Development: The site for the proposed skateboard parkis located in an
existing park. The proposed development will add a recreational use to the existing park.
The youth, young adults and parents of the City of Aspen have identifkd a recreational
need for a skateboard park. The Aspen Parks Department is proposing development of a
17,000 + sq. ft. in-ground concrete skateboard park. The skateboard park will provide a
place for a popular summer season activity to balance winter season snowboarding in the
Aspen area.
The skateboard park area will be fit into the slope and be landscaped with plant materials
that will both create vegetative screening where appropriate and increase potential
wildlife habitat. The existing basketball court will be reconstructed further down the
slope with an improved sun orientation.
2. Sufficient Public Facilities: The proposed site is located in the southeast comer of Rio
Grande Park between Rio Grande Place and the Rio Grande regional trail. This central
location will allow convenient access for the skateboard park users.
Two san-o-lets with enclosures are planned as part of this project to allow for public
restroom needs. The existing drinking fountain will be relocated to the plaza space that
will serve as the park entry. The entry will provide a space that serves as a formal access
point for the skateboard park, basketball court, playing field, Theatre in the Park and the
John Denver Sanctuary.
. Significant parking impacts are not anticipated due to the nature of the skateboarding
activity and the proximity of public transportation options.
An electrical1ine will need to be relocated to accommodate the development, however,
no other impacts to utilities are anticipated.
3. Suitable for Development: The proposed site is suitable for development of a
skateboard park. The existing soils are stable and generally comprised of glacial till with
some larger rocks. Soil borings have been completed and the Geo-technical report from
lIP Geotech is attached as 'Exhibit P'. The slopes found on site are not excessive and
are stable. Maximum sloped vegetated banks for this project will be 3: 1.
1
~
,...--.-..\
4. Planning opportunities: The proposed skateboard park has been sited at the south edge
of Rio Grande Park to facilitate access and also to mitigate potential sound impacts to the
John Denver Sanctuary area and the Theatre in the Park, The elongated "L" plan shape
provides good skate lines as well as separated areas for users with different skills and
needs.
Park elements will step down with the slope to accentuate the existing landform. The park
is comprised primarily of concrete paved basins that will be landscaped with canopy trees
and shrub massing. View corridors to the Roaring Fork Riveralong the "jail trail" and
Rio Grande Trail will be maintained. This skateboard park will become an amenity for
the Aspen area youth.
5. AACP Compliance: The skateboard park is consistent with the goals of the AACP and
is providing a recreational amenity that is currently lacking in town. The proposed
skateboard park will be a new recreational use in an existing city park. The proximity to
the core of town makes it accessible via trail and public transportation.
6. Public Fund Expenditure: . This project will not require the expenditure of public funds
for public facilities. Restroom and drinking fountain opportunities are being added as
part of the overall project scope. The central city location has convenient public
transportation and trail access opportunities.
7. Slope Development: NA - Project is not being developed on slopes in excess of 20
percent.
8. GMQS Allotments: NA
2
I.
(""\
LAND USE APPLICATION
PROJECT:
Name: ?. \ 0 6. i2 Ai\.r"DE ~ A- Te.. 1?:oA-12-l)
Location:
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, Ie al descri . tion where a ro riate)
ApPLICANT:
Name:
Address:
Phone #:
C\\,
rj
~t2. ~
c>1='
VA-le-k: 'DefA-,e.,
S?eN 0
eNT
'Olicl/
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name: 'h oS eecc..A
Address:
BS' c..e:-M6TeJe
q 2..0- 1 2-0
,
~ <.::.c ol"'l C-1-\-1 s N\
~"?EN
6c.!+\Cf<:.L-JI0<io!
Phone #:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: ( lease check all that a 1):
o Conditional Use 0
o Special Review 0
o Design Review Appeal 0
o GMQS Allotment ~
o GMQS Exemption 0
o ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream 0
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff,
Mountain View Plane
Conceptual POO
FinaCPOO (& POO Amendment)
Conceptual SPA
Final SPA (& SPA Amendment)
Subdivision
Subdivision Exemption (includes
condominiumization)
o Lot Split
o Lot Line Ad'ustment
o Temporary Use
o TextlMa Amendment
o
o
o
o
o
o
Conceptual Historic Devt.
Final Historic Development
Minor Historic Devt.
Historic Demolition
Historic Designation
Small Lodge Conversion!
Expansion
o Other:
EXISTING CONDITIONS: (descri tion of existin
_7u.~"-\c:.. ?Ae.'4'-. MA~Te(.
COM -p LE:'f&.D
rovals, etc.)
l'tte
ro osed buildin s, useS, modifications, etc.)
COr'\~mdto., t") fa' ~ lc.a..-kboCl....-d 'iC-rlc:.. C~J'\',S;..f''''j 1')+ Q.. va rl'~ ':1-'-(
{) f d ~<;,ed oY\Ct'l!!..k '::I +r~ .Cl. c:.c:.o IN\ {
~ 1::-4. tu'5a 0 -f c:I- 0 l-e.lfe. b . Pre> j ed ~t '::00 ,'f\ol v.dec::. +,,"--L
(.(:..I~o"" of ~~ .e;c.t"5ft'~ ba.sl::..c...floa..U COl<\J+ o....-d tnu, I,
~
r'\
,
ATTACHMENT 1
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project:
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
RIO <:1f2.AN'De:. ? KATe. i30.4.eD
(.1 'T';f; oLC AS'P6N PA Jl2.tc:.S
~IO ~IteAllI1>C:: ?t.Ac:.6
"P1A.1l>l..i Co 1 S PA
PA ell(
I \ o...~ r... So
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Commercial net leasable:
Number of residential units:
Number of bedrooms:
EX. isti.n g:~N;.q. Proposed:
Existing: Proposed:
Existing: Proposed:
NL
Nf~
/11/4
.
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): /V/.4--
DIMENSIONS: /'I / A
Floor Area: Existing:
Allowable:
Principal bldg, height: Existing:
Access. bldg, height: Existing:
On-Site parking: Existing:
% Site coverage: Existing:
% Open Space: Existing:
Front Setback: Existing:
Rear Setback: Existing:
Combined FIR: Existing:
Side Setback: Existing:
Side Setback: Existing:
Allowable:
Allowable:
Required:
Required:
Required:
Required:
Required:
Required:
Required:
Required:
Required:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Combined Sides: . Existing:
Existing non:Conformities or encroachments:
Variations requested:
.-,
f""";
, '!
CITY OF ASPEN
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY.
PLANNER:
Nick Lelack, 920-5095
DATE: 3/9/00
PROJECT:
Rio Grande Specially Planned Area Site Specific Development Review
REPRESENTATIVES:
Rebecca Shielding, Seott Chism
OWNER:
City of Aspen
LOCATION:
Rio Grande Park
TYPE OF APPLICATION: SPA Site Specific Development Review
DESCRIPTION:
The applicant proposes to develop a complete skateboard park, consisting of
a variety of depressed concrete structures that are designed to accommodate
skaters of all levels. The Community Development Director has determined
that this application shall proceed through the 2-step process to the Planning
and Zoning. Commission and City Council.
Land Use Code Section(s) to Address in Application:
Section 26,304.030, Application and Fees;
Section 26.440,050, Review Standards for SPA (Attached.)
Review by:
Public Hearing:
Referral Agencies:
Planning Deposit:
Total Deposit:
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council
Yes at Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council
Engineer
o
o
To apply, submit the following information: (Also see Section 26.304.030, Application and Fees)
1. 20 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. HPC = 12; PZ = 10; GMC = PZ+5;
CC = 7; Referral Agencies = l/ea.; Planning Staff = 2. The complete application packet will
include all of the following contents; however, some of the following submission contents
will include additional reqnirements, such as 3 sets of 24" x 36" site improvement surveys
and site plans. Specifically 3 sets of 24" x 36" maps shall be included: .
a. Site improvement survey.
b. Site Plan of the proposed skateboard park.
c. Vicinity of the subject parcel (so the Commission, Council and public will
understand the location of the skateboard park in relation to the rest of the park and
surrounding area.
2. A letter signed by the applicant introducing the project, and including the applicant's name,
address and telephone number, and the name, address, and telephone number. The letter
should also include (1) a statement specifying the underlying zone district on the parcel and,
if variations are proposed, a statement of how the variations comply with the standards of
.-,
r-,.
Section 26.440.040(B); (2) a statement outlining a development schedule specifying the date
. construction is proposed to be initiated and completed; (3) a statement specifying the public
facilities that will be needed to accommodate the proposed development, and what specific
assurances will be made to ensure that public facilities will be available to accommodate the
proposed development; (4) a statement of the reasonable conformance of the final
development plan with the approval granted to the conceptual development plan and with
the original intent of the City Council in designating the parcel Specially Planned Area
(SPA); (5) a statement or paragraph addressing the Trolley issue.
3. The street address, legal description, and parcel identification number of the property
proposed for development.
4, A Site Improvement Survey certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of
Colorado, showing the current status of the parcel including the current topography and
vegetation. Specifically, the survey shall depict the following:
a) Existing natural and man-made site features.
b) Existing topography and categorization of site slopes falling within the thresholds
described in General Provisions, Section 26.445,040,
c) All legal easements and restrictions,
5, An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen.
6. A detailed description and site plan of the proposed development including a statement of
the objectives to be achieved by the SPA and a description of the proposed land uses,
densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation, off-street parking, open space
areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. Site plan at 1" = 10'. Show ground
floors of all buildings on the subject parcel, as proposed, and footprints of adjacent buildings
for a distance of 100' from the side property lines. Show topography of the subject site with
2' contours.
7, A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposed
development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application.
8. A plat which depicts the applicable information required by Section 26.480,060(A)(3).
9. The Rio Grande Master Plan and approving ordinances/resolutions.
" I
r-..
~
.' ,1,
Exhibit 'A'
Resolution # 93-42
Rio Grande Master Plan
..
,
,
t"""\
11
RESOLUT:tON NO. y~
(SER:tES OF 1993)
A RESOLUTION Oll' THB CITY COUNCIL, OF THB CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO APPR9VING THB RIOG~Jil MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the Aspen city council (hereiniilfter "Council) hiilS
been requested to endorse the Rio Griilnde Miilster Pliiln whiqh hiilS been
iildopted by the Aspen Pliilnning iilnd Zoning Commission; iilnd
WHBREAS, Council directed stiilff to prepiilre iil miilster pliiln for
the Rio Griilnde property, specifically the area between Rio Grande
Drive and the Roaring Fork River; and
WHEREAS,
staff,
together with community members and
representatives of community organizations, identified general land
use concepts for future development of the property; and
WHEREAS, a land use map was created that associates specific
areas of the Rio Grande property with general land use themes and
is incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, other maps were prepared and incorporated into the
Master Plan to act as guides in elJ.suring that development of
specific uses can be acqo~oda~ed 01) ~he property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rio Grand~,Master Plan and applicable
provisions of the Municipal Code, development review for site
specific projects for the Rio Grande parcels shall be reviewed
through the Specially Planned Area development review; and
WHEREAS, the Council reviewed the proposed Master Plan maps
iilt a worksession held January 7, 1993 and provided comments to
staff and the Rio Grande Group; and
/"
,~
WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed the Master Plan at regularly
scheduled meetings March 16, 1993 and April 20, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning commission approved
Resolution No.
formally adopting the Rio Grande Master Plan at
a pUblic hearing June 8, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Council has emphasized that vehicular access to
site A be restricted as much as possible while still complying with
the needs of the park and Theatre; and
WHEREAS, the snow melter shall be relocated as soon as humanly
possible.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen city council that it does
hereby endorse the Rio Grande Master Plan for the Rio Grande
property.
APPROVED by the Council at a regularly scheduled meeting June 14,
1993.
(jL (~~-
BY:
John Bennett, Mayor
I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify
that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution
adopted
by the City council of
held ~ ,J-j
t:I
the city of Aspen, ColoradQ at a
meeting
, 1993.
;,
"
?
1"""',
r'\
}
IX a..
THRU:
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and Council AI ~
Amy Margerum, city Manager ~ ~\
Diane Moore, City Planning Direct~
Leslie Lamont, Senior Planner
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
June 14, 1993
Rio Grande Master Plan - Endors~m~nt
RE:
SUMMARY: Attached is the Rio Grande Master Plan that the Planning
and Zoning Commission adopted at a June 8, 1993 public hearing.
Staff was under the impression that a conceptual SPA ma.ster plan
was being created for approval by Council. The City Attorney has
determined that the document anci. relateci ,maps are in fact a "Master
Plan" because the plan does not address development issues for site
specific proposals. A plan that establishes general guidelines
and goals should be used as a Master Plan to guide future
development. When site specific:dev~lopment is proposed the full
SPA review process will then be used for development review.
Fortunately, a master plan does not expire after two years like a
conceptual SPA Master Plan. The Master Plan remains in effect
until it is either amended or superseded by another plan. The
various organizations that participated in the Master Planning
process thought that conceptual SPA review was beinq accomplished
and only final SPA review (a 2 step vs. 4 step review process)
would be necessary before their particular development. However,
staff recently amended the Land Use Code to enable an applicant to
consolidate the four step SPA review process into a two step review
process, similar to PUD review. Therefore, if an applicant
submits an application for development soon after the Master Plan
is adopted and the proposal is consistent with the Master Plan, a
consolidated SPA review may be appropriate.
The Planning and Zoning commission adopts a Master Plan by
Resolution and Council shall endorse the Commission's adopted plan.
Please see the attached Resolution adopting the Master Plan.
CURRENT ISSUES: Staff has been working with a citizen committee,
the Rio Grande Group, to formulate theFio Grande Master Plan. The
Group has recommended several land use\actions and developed three
land. use development scenarios. Those three scenarios are
represented by the land use maps provided in Appendix A of the
plan. The maps are intended to serve as guides for site specific
development. Based upon the Planning and Zoning Commissioner
comments at the last meeting, the three "Potential Development
~
"'.
RYhthit-A-
. u_
RESOLUTION NO.
~~:l Council
Approved
By Ordinance
(SERIES OF 1993)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY .OF
ASPEN, COLORADO APPROVING THE RIO GRANDE MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the Aspen city council (hereinafter "Council) has
been requested to endorse the Rio Grande Master Plan which has been
adopted by the Aspen Planning and Zoning commission; and
WHEREAS, council directed staff to prepare a master plan for
the Rio Grande property, specifically the area between Rio Grande
Drive and the Roaring Fork River; and
WHEREAS,
staff,
together with community members
and
representatives or community organizations, identified general
use concepts for future development of the property; and
land
WHEREAS,a land use map was created that identifies specific
areas of the Rio Grande property with general land use themes and
is incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, other maps were prepared and incorporated into the
Master Plan to act as guides in ensuring that development of
specific uses can be accommodated on the property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rio Grande Master Plan and applicable
provisions of the Municipal Code, development review for site
specific projects for the Rio Grande parcels shall be reviewed
through the Specially Planned Area development review; and
WHEREAS, the Council reviewed the proposed Master Plan at a
worksession held January 7, 1993 and provided comments to staff and
the Rio Grande Group; and
"
:
City Council
~ ~pproved
By Ordinance
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ADOPTING THE RIO GRANOE MASTER PLAN
Exhibit f-)
, 19
"
Resolution No. 92-__
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and zoning commission (hereinafter
"commission") have the responsibility and the authority to adopt
comprehensive plans for Aspen; and
WHEREAS, the commission and City Council dIrected staff to
prepare a Master Plan for the publically owned Rio Grande property,
with attention focused primarily on the area between Rio Grande
Drive and the Roaring Fork River; and
WHEREAS, staff, together with community members and
representatives of community organizations forming the Rio Grande
Group, identified general .land use goals and recommendations for'
future development of the property; and .
. WHEREAS, a land use ~ap has been created that identifies
specific areas of the Rio Grande property with general land use
, . . f . .
themes, wh~ch map shall be adopted' w~th the Master Plan and
incorporated therein; and
WHEREAS, three other land use maps have been prepared and
included in Appendix A of the Master Plan to ensure that
development of specific uses can be accommodated on the property,
however, these maps are intended to be used only as guides; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has formally reviewed the Master Plan
at regularly scheduled meeting April 20, 1993; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed Public Hearing was held by the
Commission on June 8, 1993 to consider the Master Plan for the Rio
Grande.property.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED by the Commission that it
does hereby adopt the Rio Grande Master Plan.
APPROVED by the Commission at their regular meeting on June 8,
1993.
ATTEST:
ASPEN PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Jan carney; Deputy city Clerk
Jasmine Tygre, Chairperson
. ~,~
,
r\
/""l
George Robinson
Parks Department
City of A"pen
CITY OF ASPEN RIO GRANDE
CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN 1993
'"
Prepared by:
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
Technical assistance provided by:
Rick McGill
.'
"
1"""\
,-",
CREDITS
The Planning Department would like to thank those individuals who
donated their valuable time to' this plan: Kirk Baker, Rebecca
Baker., Sally Barnett, Fritz Benedict, Alan Bloomquist, Tom
Bracewell, Jon Busch, Chris Churchill, Hal Clark, Ed Cross,
Patrick DUffield, Jim. Duke, Suzanne Farver, Andy Freeman, Chris
Hall, Roger Hunt, Julia Marshall, Carol Lowenstern, Lance Luckett, .
Ramona Markalunas, Bruce Matherly, Jack Reid, George Robinson, and
Chuck Roth.
,
r'\
tl
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page
Purpose of the Master Plan
Location Map
Process
Summarized History
Assumptions
site A
* Existing Conditions
* Map
* Goals
* Recommended Land Uses/Activities
* Recommended Action Plan summary
site B
* Existing Conditions
* Map
* Goals
* Recommended Land Uses/Activities
* Recom~ended Action Plan Summary
Rio Grande conceptual SPA Land Use Map
Appendix A - Potential Development Scenarios
Appendix B - History of Parcel
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
11
12
13
14
14
17
20
.'
r"\
t1
PURPOSE QF THE MASTER'l>>LAN
The Aspen City Council directed staff to create a -Specially I'lanri'ed
Arlaa (SPA) master plan to guide future development of the remaining.
"undeveloped" portion 0.1: theR;O, gr:<illde property. Council's intent
for a new plan was to identify appropriate activities and land use
patterns for the Rio Grande property. Council. emphasized that all
public interests sh,ouldpe considered .in., this .lIeW planning effort.
The Rio Grande property is zoned Public with a Specially Planned
Area (SPA) overlay. The purpose of. a SPA overlay is to provide
design flexibility for land which requires innovative
consideration. The SPA allows for the development of mixed land
uses through the encouragement of in~ovative design practices and
establishment of a procedure wher~by land that- contains multiple
land uses, which in-e. considered appropriate, can be planned and
redeveloped in a holistic manner providing for the greatest public
benefit.
The property is bordered by Rio Grande Drive .on the south, the
Roaring Fork ~iver on the north, Mill Street on the west, and the
Eagles Club/Patsy Newbury Park on the east.
, ....
...
, ...
I
:r
..
"
~
1~
Hot,tl,tt.etlorroad'.11
t>UMd on tupI. CoMtn.Iet!on
oIllrwtt.ndfOalll_ytl4k1.
~lI'l~".ln...",
-.,('-
Aspen
Rio Grande SPA
Master Plan Site
<1$"
""11
.Mountain
/-
---~''''''''''''''''''''''''''.''~--=--._-'.-
1
"~
,~,
The Rio Grande master plan was developed as a conceptual SPA Plan.
Following it's adoption, new development or significant alterations
must be consistent with this conceptual SPA plan and shall )::Ie
reviewed pursuant to the final SPA development review process. A
simil1ir process was conducted in 1988 when the Parking Garage,
Library, and Youth Center were all planned and developed in
accordance with conceptual and final SPA plans.
In addition to characterizing the Rio Grande parcel as two separate
but interactive pieces, this document summarizes the history of the
entire parcel, outlines existing conditions, identifies goals for
each piece, proposes land uses/activities, and. makes
recommendations for future use.
The document provides a conceptual land use map that is a general
outline for. proposed uses. Three land use plans/maps for the
entire study area depicting, how the uses may be integrated' are
provided "in Appendix A. The three maps are intended to serve as
guides for specific development scenarios but were not adopted as
part of this plan. Timing and particular needs of future programs
will dictate which of the1;:hree scenarios, or another scenario
conceived of at the time of final development review, is best to
utilize.
The Planning commission believed that final development of the
property should be flexible and specific building location and
building size should be determined when site specific proposals are
submitted for review. Except for site A, (Which is identified as
a passive park only with an art theme) the rest of the land that
was purchased with transportation funds (all of site B) should be
transportation oriented if developed in the future. Unless a
potential use can be temporary in nature, only transportation
related land uses should be considered in a final SPA plan review.
Specific development details, used to ensure that a number of land
uses could be accommodated on the parcel, accompany the maps in
Appendix A.
PROCESS
Staff formed the Rio Grande Group (a citizens review group) and
began the planning process in November of 1991. The charge to the
Group was to work with staff to develop the conceptual SPA plan.
The Group was expected to identify critical features of the
property that' shoUld be enhanced and/or preserved, resolve land
use issues pertaining to the site and make recommendations
regarding appropriate land use development.
However, it was not the purpose
community-wide issues such as the
trolley system should be pursued.
of the Group to decide whether
valley-wide rail or a cross-town
There are other decision-making
2
r~
1\.
arenas that will decide the fate of those projects. Some of those
alternatives were considered when making recommendations.
The Rio Grande Group met approximately 16 times over an eight month
period. One of the first tasks of the Rio Grande Group was to
review existing and proposed land uses for this vital piece of
community property. Initial meetings were devoted to a
presentation and discussion of particular land uses on each section
of property.
discussion sites
recommendations
The property was divided into two manageable
for which primary land use goals and
development were made:
for
site A: the area between the river and bike path next to
the snow melter (page 6); and
site B: the recycle site (Old Impound lot) and the
playing field (page 13).
IDSTORY
This is a brief summary of the planning review history of the
prop~rty. For a more thorough history refer to Appendix B.
In 1967, the Denver Rio Grande Western Railroad began discussions
with the city and County regarding redevelopment of their property
and right-of-way. Since those initial discussions there have been
many plans regarding this 18 acre parcel:
*
1973 -
*
1975 -
1978
*
1981 -
*
1982 -
*
1988 -
The city used 7th penny
to purchase a majority
property.
transportation funds
of the Rio Grande
A Performing Arts Center for the property was
studied.
A non-specified 1. 5 acre site was set aside for
a future Performing Arts/Conference Center and
the city moved the snow dump for the Sanitation
District property to the Rio Grande property.
The city and County exchanged the Aspen One,
Oden and stable properties.
A conceptual SPA master plan was adopted by
Council identifying a parking garage, the
library, the Spring Street extension, a snow
melt facility and an arts usage area.
3
~
~
*
1989 -
A final SPA plan was
the parking' .garage
library.
A final SPA plan was approved by Council for
the'Youth Center.
approved by council for
and the Pitkin county
*
1990 -
*
1991 -
Council denied conceptual SPA approval for the
trolley, Theatre in the Park, recycle facility
and snow melt operation and instead directed
staff to prepare a conceptual SPA master plan
for the entire site.
ASsuMP:rIONS
The -Group identified several assumptions with regard to the
property. From. the basis of these assumptions the Group began
their review of existing land uses and proposed land uses.
The first assumption was past planning efforts. As indicated by
the summarized history of the site, there have been many Rio Grande
plans. Rather than completely replan the parcel, the Group began
their review of the property from the perspective of existing uses
and past plans.
Secondly, the Group considered why and how the different pieces of
property were purchased. Some of site A and all of site B were
purchased with transportation funds and most of the river frontage
was purchased with open space funds.
Third, the extensive work on the whitewater course and initial
regrading of site A, has required adjustments to the traditional
method of dumping snow on site A. In 1991, the City Council
directed the Public Works Department to find an alternative to
dumping snow on the parcel. In response, the Department is
attempting to purchase land' adjacent to the County Maintenance
Facility for snow storage. The site will not be ready for
approximately two years so the snow melter is still needed for that
period. The Group is confident that the operation of the snow
melter, if adjusted, can continue in the near future.
Fourth, the Group realized that there were other decision making
processes which could affect development of the two sites. The
Group knew that a valley-wide rail system terminating on the Rio
Grande, ultimately a tri-county decision, could use a significant
portion of the property. The possibility of the Trolley System
affecting the property is also beyond the Group's control and is
now in the hands of the Transportation Implementation Committee.
However, the Group reviewed the two proposed land uses and made
specific recommendations if the train and trolley were developed
4
.
~
1~4
on the property.
Finally, additional SPA review will be required for.site specific
development and dimensional requirements and development details
will be considered at that time. Depending upon how the land was
originally purchased, future permanent development may require
voter approval which is also out of th", Group's purview.
with the considerations mentioned above the Group reviewed the
potential land uses of each site.
SITE A
I. Existinq Conditions
Site A is generally described as the land between the bike path
and row of large cottonwoods that edge the playing field, and the
river. However, it also encompasses the existing snow melter and
the drainage pond closest to Mill Street. Please refer to Map 1.
The property is 2.213 acres.
site A consists of the snow
sedimentation pond necessary for
the site has also been used as a
or dumping into the snow melter.
melter, and sand filter and
this operation. Traditionally,
"snow dump" for melting on site
For seven years, the Aspen Theatre in the. Park has set up its
theatre tent on this site for live performances June through
September. For the: summer of 1992, the theatre received a
temporary use permit to set up a larger tent with increased back
stage capacity.
The Art Park group has been very active and generous in its efforts
to reverse a trend of neglect towards this portion of the Rio
Grande property. The group has rejuvenated the westerly portion
of site A near the Ron Karagian bridge and the berm adjacent to the
theatre tent. The Art Park has evolved into a beautiful garden
showcasing local artist's work.
The Art Park and Theatre groups have been the catalyst for the City
to reconsider their stewardship of this community property. They
first rallied the community to enhance the riverbank emphasizing
the river and park interaction. As a result, city Council
allocated approximately $60,000 to excavate the high water channel,
adjacent to the main river channel, for a whitewater course. As
part of the development of the course, the City created a
pedestrian path along the river and revegetated the river bank and
slope of the property down to the whitewater course. The walking
path is intended to enhance the river experience and meander along
5
.,..,--.....
0'\.
the river's edge changing elevation as it follows the white water
course. The path will not be paved because the existing' paved bike
path at the edge of the park is intended to serve multi-users.
Finally, site A is an important pedestrian connection between
downtown, the Art Museum, Herron Park and the dense lIunter Creek
neighborhood. The Karagian bridge, long been in.place, became a
strong link to the Museum with the Art Park revitalization.
Mal' 1 - Site A
,
,
"
ation / Transportation
,
"
,
"
.,
"
"
"
"
,
"
,
"
"
"
"
"
>
/
1
"
,
/ /
f'-
.-
" ~/ .
~'_' /1
'" .. :..." '"
{';o.. ..." ,," ...-
, va ...
. Q ......' --- /
~IG 'O~o: -0., " 1
_ 6A '\ ....... _ _ " /
'4,,_ \ .'., /
"
/r-,
I '
, '
6
"
"
"'"'"
~
II. Goals
The basis of the goals identified for this Site were the funding
sources for the initial purchase and the unique characteristics of
the Site. The majority of the site is compriseq of the Aspen One
Pr~perty (acquired with Sixth Penny Open Space Funds in 1978) and
the parcel the city traded with Pitkin County in 1982. A smaller
piece of the parcel was purchased with 7th Penny Transportation
Funds.
The parcel contains prime public river frontage and was identified
as a key piece in the 1973 Roaring Fork Greenway Plan. The
Greenway Plan promotes preservation Clf, indigenous species and
maintenance of the riparian environment Cilong the Roaring Fork
River and its, tributCirie,s. The Greenway Plan also supports an
extensive trail system throughout the "Greenway" for "Illaximum
possible recreational and educational potential."
The site is also an important hub in the bikeway/pedestrian tr~il
system and is consistent with future plans to extend the pedestrian
and bike paths upriver. From this point, one can go up or down
river, into downtown, to the Art Museum, or over to the post
office-retail center on pedestrian/bike paths.
The following Goals were established for redevelopment of site A:
a. Develop a passive park offering a quiet open space for
the community.
b. visually and physically connect the river with the 'park.
c. Support the Art Theme connecting various art oriented
elements such as the art park, Theatre in the Park and
Aspen Art Museum.
d. Discourage permanent development except for structures
which support the Art Theme or enhance the edge of the
river as a people place.
e. Discourage employee housing as an inappropriate use for
this site.
f. Provide a venue for local artists in support of the Art
Theme.
g.
Limit vehicular
delivery/service and
theatre.
access except for theatre
parking for the disabled at the
h. Coordinate park activities with the Art ,Museum.
i. Maintain pedestrian/bike paths throughout the site.
7
,~
r,
"
III. Recommended Land Uses/Activities for site A
This site is divided into several elements for discussion purposes:
J. site Enhancement -
The whitewater course is almost completed. The river
bank has been regraded and recontoured to create more of
a visual and physical connection to the river's edge.
The banks of the' channel have been revegetated and
stabilized.
A river walk has been established at a lower elevation
from the park with the intent of being more remote from
activities of the city and more restive for the
pedestrian.
A small bowl-shaped sitting area has been carved into the
bank above the river walk to afford viewing of the new
whitewater course.
The sitting area remains unfinished. More dirt should
be removed from that area to sculpt the curve of the bowl
and reduce the steepness of slope so people can sit
comfortably. However, further regrading of the rest of
the site is unnecessary because it will eliminate the
flat surface and inhibit park use. Irrigation should be
considered along the slope for growth and as well as a
water feature.
Some revegetation and channel work have yet to be
finalized, including the land surrounding the pond near
Mill street. Native wildflower mix and irrigation
ditches will be integrated into the landscape. Other
footpaths may be needed in the future and should be
considered as park use evolves.
Revegetation of the park shall include the theatre tent.
The landscaping should help screen the tent's stored
trusses, storage shed and wood, floor in the off season.
It is important to note that the regrading and
recontouring of the site does not impact the temporary
use of the snowmelter or sedimentation pond. It does,
however" require an alternative site for the dumping of
snow. The city has,begun to accommodate snow dumping in
other locations and is attempting to purchase another
site for dumping snow.
The Group has concluded that snow melt activity is
inappropriate in the long-term view of the park. The
snow dump should be relocated immediately and the snow
melter relocated from site A as soon as possible. An
8
~
('1
alternative location may be considered on the recycle
site integrated, with the expanded recycle facility,
Trolley Barn, and/or another transportation or essential
community service land use.
As long as the snow melter remains in the current
location, the existing sand filter is necessary but
should be reshaped into a water feature for the summer.
The edges of the, ,seclimentation pond will be reworked to
give a more la!ldsc::aI:1l3dfhlish. Both the inside and
outside of the pond should be sloped to provide a more
gentle finish and reduce the water depth.
2 . Art Park Theme
A strong Art Theme should be promoted as an important use
for the Rio Grande parcel. The Art Theme is already
supported by a: variety ,of existing uses: the Theatre in
the Park, on-site sculpture and flower gardens introduced
by the' Art Park group and direct access to the Art
Museum.
Continued support for the Art Park group's efforts will
provide local artists, a venue for their work. Art will
be located in the park on a revolving basis and maximum
flexibility can be achieved by variety of spaces. This
is important to accommodate different works. The Art
Park group also proposes to continue to maintain the
flower gardens, sponsor and encourage outdoor sculpture,
and expand irrigation and lighting systems. To ensure
maintenance and management of program responsibilities
the Art Park group must work with the City to define
policies or agree on a contract.
Aspen Theatre in the Park is a key component of the Art
Theme. The theatre recently installed a new wood floor
with an improved drainage system. The company also
received a temporary use permit to put up a larger tent.
This permit will be reviewed on an annual basis unless
the company receives final SPA approval. Aspen Theatre
in the Park runs from June through August performing four
nights a week.
Currently, the theatre plans (and is required as part of
the temporary useper~it) to take down the tent and store
the support beams on-site a~ the~nd, of the season. The
wood floor and a small shed for equipment storage will
remain on site. The shed will also provide locked
storage during the summer.
At this point, Aspen Theatre in the Park is not
9
~
,~\
.
considering a year round facility. If the need for a
year round facility is supported by the community, then
future development at this site should be ,reviewed at
that time. Review should consider the proposed
improvements, infrastructure needs and impacts on the
passive park use.
The theatre has often considered on-site housing for
,personnel. The Rio Grande, Group does not support housing
for theatre personnel finding the use inappropriate on
this site. Housing, would conflict with the "passive
park" use identified for the site. In addition, housing
in the park sets a bad precedent for other city and
County parks.
3. Level of Activity-
other land uses pertaining to food or commercial uses
have been discussed for tl'1is area. , The anticipated
argument for locating these uses on the river's edge is
the creation of more activity along the ,river within the
urban setting of the city. Food booths along the paths
could encourage a more festive gathering place in the
park.
However, careful evaluation must be given to future
vending along the river. The character of the Rio Grande
parcel, al though not void of structured acti vi ty or
development i.e. the Theatre in the~ark, should focus
primarily on the river. The visual and physical
connection to the river is the fundamental goal for land
use on this site. The Art Theme and other improvements
are to support and compliment the river as the primary
amenity. Any commercial venture must not detract from
that goal.
Thus, small vending booths or food stands cannot block
visual access to the river. Physical access to and
through the parcel or use of the footpath cannot be
diminished by vending operations. Potential impacts
generated by these types of uses,: vehicle related
deliveries, trash, fumes, noise, power lines, must also
be contained and kept at a minimum at best.
Given the above constraints, the Art Museum appears to
be a more suitable location for these types of proposed
uses. In addition, the Museum side receiyes more sun
than the Rio Grande side, a retail venture is more
consistent with the commercial orientation of the Art
Museum, and the Museum has the water and sewer services
for food oriented activities.
10
..
,0
~
~
4. Access to the site -
There is a service drive that currently accesses the site
(Art Park Way). The road will be eliminated and replaced
with a 12-14 foot wide concrete pedestrain/bike path.
The path may be used by theatre service/delivery and park
maintenance vehicles onlv. The access may also be used
by the disabled when attending the theatre. Two
handicapped parking space~, tl:1atyig d()ubl",as delivery
space, will be provided at the tent. ' . . .
To alleviate the impact of only one access, point to the
park and to encourage less traffic on the access road,
another point of access for pedestrians has been
identified. Access will be upgraded, to include a
sidewalk and gutter, between the, Eagles Club and the
recycle site. A pull-out area'will be provided at that
portion of Rio Grande Drive for drop-Off. '
IV. Recommended Action Plan Summarv for, site A
To achieve the goals and proposed land uses for this site, the Rio
Grande Group recommends the following actions for site A:
1. The regraded site should be revegetated and ditches
should be added throughout the park 'area adding water
features and park irrigation.
2. Pedestrian paths may be developed in the future if
warrarited. '
3. Pond and irrigation ditch leakage should be corrected.
4. The snow ll\elter should be relocated out of Site A within
two years froll\ the purchase of an alternative snow dump
site.
5. The sand filter should be reshaped for use as a summer
water feature and more efficient operation unless the
eventual relocation of the snow melter no longer requires
the filter in which case it should be eliminated.
6. The pond closest to the snow melter (sedimentation pond)
should be recontoured to compliment the surrounding park
landscape and revamped to improve its function as a
settling pond for the snow melter.
7. A small turn around for service/delivery combined with
two disabled parking spaces should be designed next to
the theatre tent at the end of new pedestrian/bike path.
8. The small bowl-shaped seating area should be finished.
11
,~
/--'\
~, ,
",'
9. Access will be upgraded at the path between the Eagles
Club and the recycle site. Drop-off will be provided for
access to Patsy Newbury park and Rio Grande.
10. A 20 foot buffer has been delineated' on the sitemaps.
This buffer is the boundary between site A and site B.
The buffer lends protection for site A from encroachments
and inappropriate uses from Site B yet provides site
develo_PIll~_~t, flexibility for si-ua-:-- ---.-----
..__~".-,~'-.."'''-."'' "," "",'. .' "'.' _,'",,,. "~,,,,,,'_,,,,,,,,,"~" ,_"_c'.,,.. .., ..,'
SITE B
site B encompasses the existing recycle site on the eastern portion
of, the parcel, the access road down to site A, the s~all triangle
of open space between the access road and bike/pedestriap path, and
the playing field. This piece of the master plan is bordered by
Rio Grande Drive, Mill Street, and a row of cottonwoods and a
pedestrian/bike path to the north (please see Map 2).
I. Existinq Conditions
The community's recycling drop-off center has temporarily occupied
the eastern portion of site B for several years. The facility
accepts the widest variety of materials, and because of its central
location, is one of the most accessible drop points within Pitkin
county. The materials accepted at the site are: aluminum, tin,
glass, plastic, newsprint, cardboard, low grade paper, high grade
paper, green bar computer paper, and used dry cell batteries.
There is a 20 yard roll off dumpster for glass, a 100 yard trailer
for cardboard, twenty-five 90 gallon containers for aluminum, tin,
plastic and all grades of paper and a small container for
batteries. An employee of pitkin County Public Resources monitors
collection of materials at the site. Recently, the berms
surrounding this area have been increased in order to shield the
recycle activity from view, to prevent blowing trash and to reduce
haul costs during the construction of the white water course.
The access road (snow dump road) used for the snow melter and the
theatre is approximately 40 feet wide.
The playing field, which occupies the majority of this parcel, was
established as a temporary use until such time that the field ,is
converted for transportation uses.
other than the goal posts, and temporary recycle containers the
parcel is void of any structural development.
12
.
,
~
t"""I
Map 2
Site B
Ii-
" -
13
,""
/---\
II. Goals
Because the site was purchased with 7th Penny Transportation funds
the basis of future dev.elopment goals is transportation oriented.
,The parcel is also across the street from multiple land uses
including the Bass/Obermeyer building, which is zoned
service/Commercial/Industrial (SCI). Because of the close
proximity to the SCI zone district and to downtown, a variety of
land uses, including essential community services, are considered
appropriate for this site.
The Rio Grande Group has identified the following Goals for the
redevelopment of Site B:
a. Locate essential cOlll!llunity services in the eastern portion of
SiteB.
b. Maintain existing land uses on the accessible eastern portion
of the site. Because of this'area's location and visibility,
ensure that existing and future uses are compatible with
surrounding land uses.
c. satisfy transportation related needs first when considering
the use of Site B.
d. Retain and optimize park/recreational uses in this area and
replace the active park and playfield only with a regional
rail facility.
e. Preserve view planes to the river and Independence Pass with
low-profile development.
III. Recommended Land Uses/Activities for Parcel B
This parcel can be divided into severai different elements for
discussion purposes:
l. Recycle site -
The recycling center is in critical need of an enc+osed
space for collection of material. Blowing trash has been
a problem and inclement weather reduces the site to mud.
Pitkin County Public Resources proposes to construct a
facility that is partially below grade and will make
collection, bailing, and hauling of material more
efficient.
Enclosed bins and bailing will eliminate unsightly
conditions and blowing trash. Enlarged collection areas
and more storage for material will reduce the number of
trips made to haul the material off-site. Efficient
drop-off will encourage residents to ,continue to use the
14
-
.
-.
if .~
~
site.
The upgrade of the recycle facility should consider
relocation possibilities to City land across the street
on ,the corner Of Spring'and East Bleeker Streets.
2. Trolley Barn -
The Trolley Group proposes to develop a trolley rail
system. The system includes a car barn facility, tracks
and poles, and several trolley cars. Review for this
plan only considered operation and routing which is
suggested to occur on the Rio Grande parcel.
Depending upon the location of the barn it can be
incorporated with the proposed expansion and enclosure
of the recycle facility or integrated with a future rail'
terminal on the playing field.
The structure is proposed to be one story in height.
This is consistent with the recommendation for low-
profile development on the parcel to avoid blocking views
to the river if the barn is developed near the playing
field or Independence Pass. If the barn is developed on
the eastern portion of,the site.
The building could also be designed to enable affordable
housing on a second level. The Trolley Group cannot fund
the cost of the housing but is willing to make the
structure available for future housing development.
Impacts to the river and Independence Pass view planes
would have to be considered.
Although the Group believes that housing associated with
the theatre was an inappropriate land use, housing on top
of the trolley barn may be more suitable if developed on
the eastern portion of the site. The site's proximity
to the street, S/C/I zone district and location on the
edge of the park lend a more urban feel for a multi-use
development.
3. Access Road -
The access road to the snow melter and theatre (snow dump
road) is 40 feet wide. Vehicular access into the park
should be eliminated. A new pedestrian/bike path should
replace the existing pedestrian/bike path and access
road. It should be 12-14 feet wide and could be located
either next to the playing field or recycle site. It the
path were located next to the playing field the eastern
portion of the site could be unified creating more land
area for proposed uses. The new path is intended for
15
~
/-'\
c'
pedestrian and bikes but the width can accommodate
theatre service/delivery and park maintenance vehicles.
Two accessible parking spaces will also be provided for
the disabled attending a production at the tent.
5. Snow Melter -
The snow melter will be removed,from site A.
recycle site should be considered as a
alternative for the snow melter. Integratiqn
transportation/essential community services
considered.
The current
relocation
with other
should be
6. Additional Activities -
In the event either the Trolley Barn, recycling center
or the snow melter are not built on the eastern portion
of the site, other essential community oriented services
may be located on site. However, a final SPA review
would be required. Because transportation funds were,
used to purchase this piece of property transportation
related services should be given priority.
7. Active Park -
Although the eventual development of a valley-wide rail
system will require the use of the majority of site Bas'
a rail terminal, it may be years before a rail system is
implemented in the Roaring Fork Valley. Therefore, the
Group identified interim uses which are considered
appropriate for site B.
Increased recreational activities should be installed on
site B. A full-court basketball court and half-pipe
skateboard ramp can be located on site B.
The rugby field (390' x 225') should be squared off to
enhance the playing area.
Park and recreational uses should exist on this site onlY
to be replaced by a regional rail facility.
16
~
~
8. Rail
The valley-wide Rail Task Force has been actively
pursuing a valley-wide rail that will terminate at site
B. This master plan did not addr~ss the rail question
in detail because the decision-making involves a broader
forum.
Initially Commuter rail would not require the loss of the
playing field. Recreational activity can still be
accommodated if the commuter and trollEiy tracks are
installed at the northern edge of the playing field. A
ticket kiosk, located next to the new pedestrian/bike
path, could service both the trolley and commuter rail
passengers.
If rail develops from commuter 'to regional rail service,
the rail terminal may be developed at the far end of the
field thus preserving some open space for park purposes.
The trolley barn could also be incorporated into the rail
terminal to preserve space. However, the majority of
the playinej field will be lost when the rail becomes
fully developed. A terminal, passenger platforms, and
possibly three sets of tracks would be necessary for
regional rail. The existing transportation center, under
the parking garage, could be used for ticketing, baggage,
and passenger services.
The trolley tracks on the north side of the field will
remain and a trolley stop will be tied into the rail
terminal.
IV. Recommended Action p~an Summary for site B
To achieve the goals and proposed land uses for this site, the Rio
Grande Group recommends the following actions for Site B:
L The City of Aspen should decide whether a City-wide
trolley system is appropriate in Aspen. If the Trolley
is approved as proposed, the eastern portion of site B
is the recommended site for the Trolley barn. However,
the barn may be integrated with a regional rail facility
when that land use is developed.
2. A height limit of one story should accompany any
development on Site B unless housing is approved for the
Trolley barn on the eastern portion of the site.
3. Development on the eastern portion of Site B should be
screened from the playing field and site A.
l7
E\
,
4. The slope and berms on the eastern portion of SiteB
should be revegetated to blend into the park on the rest
of site B and site A.
5. Any development on the eastern portiqh of site B should
not intrude into the Independence Pass view plane.
6. The city and county should review the recommendations of
the Roaring Fork Forum study relating to a regional-wide
recycling program and other remedies that are' being,
considered for the County recycling program. If the
recycling operation is considered necessary at this
location then the recycling site should be covered or
contained and may be expanded up to 5,200 square feet.
The recycling facility should be incorporated into the
Trolley barn structure and/or snow melt facility, and
should front the street for easy public access.
7. The access road (snow dump road) should be eliminated:
The pedestrian/bike path connecting Rio Grande Drive to
site A should be 12-l4 feet wide and may accommodate
theatre service/delivery and park maintenance vehicles
onlY. The path may also be used by the disabled to park
at the theatre during a performance.
8. The walking path should be improved at the higher
elevation along the slope that forms the edge of the
recycle site.
9.
~lfCity ShO?,ld, " wo, rk .w".~,..t"'h,=,_~,,he .Xo~~"h~'"C,eri"t~~.""'t"g."'tf€viiiiop~
, , 'jI!il!""'~afi~at:~:orr?:t,;~~;!:;1,V~J:1es.on s~tel3".il
10. The city should consider extending recreational
activities onto Patsy Newbury Park.
11. The temporary active park and playfield should be
maintained on site B only to be replaced by a regional
rail facility.
12. If a transportation use is developed on the playing
field, then an equivalent parcel, in the City, should
replace the playing field.
13. A J;;ailt.r~ina1 and accessory facilities, if developed
on the R~o Grande property, should be developed only on
site B.
14 . DevelOPlllen~'2'()f "J'g.11.""""'"Yact:H ties should not block-off
access~;~-15oth-visually and physically, to site A.
15. The Youth Center and the City should build a full-court
basketball court in the open space between the recycle
18
C.
: e<lf.
t"',
o
facility and the playing field.
The Youth Center and the City should install a half-Pi~;Je ."
skateboard ramp in the open space between the recycle
facility and the playing field.
The city should realign the playing field.
19
I""".
Exhibit 'B'
Warranty Deed
r-\
-.,...,'-""
'~
, 'I
Filed for l;.~cord at ' " 12 A.H.
Reception No. 162368 decorder
September 17, 197~
Peggy E. 'M~klich
A-
.a",~'145
.'
~ Attachment C
STAlE nOCOMENTARf ifF
WARRANTY DEED SEP 1 71973
s.E~~, _
THIS DEED, MADE AND ENTERED INTO this ~ day of S"li'-I:..""k
1973, by and ,between JAMES R. TRUEMAN, individually, of the first
part, and THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a municipal corporatio~~ ,,'>/..' ..~"
of the second part:
:-!.!.!~~~~~!!!.:
THAT the,said party of the first part, for and in, considera-
tion of the sum of TEN AND 001100's DOLLARS ($10.00), and other
good and valuable consideration, to the said party of the first
part in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the re-
ceipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted,
bargained, sold and conveyed', and by these presents does grant,
bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the said party of the
second part, its heirs and assigns forever, all the following
described lots or parcels of land, situate, lying and being in
the County of pitkin and State of Colorado, to-wit:
A TRACT OJ;' LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUAR'l'ER
OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE
6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING
MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT AT THE EAST SIDE OF MILL STREET
WHENCE THE WEST ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7
BEARS N 38'06'14" W 1542.42 ~EET,
THENCE S 56'06'43" E 120.33 FEET,
THENCE N 33'53'35" E 78.32 FEET,
THENCE S 75'51'14" E 67.25 FEET,
THENCE N 84'34'25" E 121.34 FEET,
THENCE S 00'17'28" W 130.87 FEET,
THENCE S 89'28'55"E l84.09 FEET;
THENCE S 00'58'09" W 109.72 FEET;
THENCE N 16'34'56" E 9.37 FEET:
THENCE S 74'37'51" E 141.49 FEET:
THENCE S 09'26'26" E 412.35 FEET,
THENCE S 43'10'38" E 89.04 FEET;
THENCE 233.4l FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 309.26 FEET AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS
S 64'56'02" E 227.91 FEET, ,,'
THENCE S 03'22'00" W 100.08 F.EET,
THENCE 309.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 409.34 FEET AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS
N 64'54'1,9" W 302.07 FEET,'
THENCE N 44'54'27" W 66.04 FEET:
THENCE N 75'12'56" W 15.86 FEET:
THENCE N 75'11'28" W 25.48 FEET:
THENCE N 16'49'23" E 83.76 FEET:
".-...,
'.
BOOK G 19 PAGE 746
THENCE N 73"19'31" W 271.88 FEET;
THENCE S 16"37'11" W 90.78 FEET;
THENCE N57"36'26" W 10.54 FEET;
THENCE S 84"21'32" W 164.64 FEETi
THENCE N 87"31'46" W 88.97 FEET;
THENCE S 14"26'08" W 75.82 FEET;'
THENCE N 43"12'17" W 408.87 FEET;
THENCE N 19"50'59" E 495.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 11.496 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appur~
,t~nances th~reto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the
reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues
and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest,
claim and demand whatsoever of th~ said party of the first part,
either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained pre-
mises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and
described, with the appurtenances; unto the said party of the
second part, for its heirs and assigns forever. And the said
party of the first part, for himself, his heirs, executors, .and
administrators, does covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and
with the said party of Fhe second part, its heirs and assigns,
that at the time of the ensea1ing and de1ivery.Of these presents,
he is well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good,
sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,
in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful
authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner
and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from
all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, as-
sessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or nature soever:
except easements to Klaus F. Obermeyer for sewer purposes, and
to Aspen One Company for accesS purposes; all easements and rights
of way, rights of ore extraction and rights of way for ditches as
reserved in united States Patents of Record and canals as reserved
,in United States Patents of Record, licenses, existing roads,
highways, ditches, pipelines, encroachments of f~nces, fencelines,
..
,
u.. , " ........""..,.,_'"'~~'L..'_'_ c.' ~_, nc",:...:_.
,,~.'
__".. .. '__. 0'.,.'. ..
'r-.,'- ,-
JL;J
'-
800K279 PAGE747
,buildings, any tax assessments, fees, charges by reason of the
inclusion of the subject property in the Aspen Metropolitan Sani-
tation District and Aspen Fire Protection District prorated to
date of closing, general taxes, insurance, etc. prorated to, date
of closing;
And the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable
possession of the said party of the second part, its heirs and
assigns against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming
or to claim the whole or any part thereof, the said party of the
first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. The singu-
lar number shall include the plural, the plural the singular,
and the USe of any gender shall be applicable to all, genders.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has
hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first above written.
~Q.J
JAMES R. TRUEMAN
Party of the First Part
STATE OF COLORADO
ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN
~$'*'!l-,'
,;",,'~'~k !"",':,"'~~Oing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,~~
, "', ." .~.h.., '.... ',' ,...
';~~i~fA;~~~tt~< , 1973, by JAMES R. TRUEMAN.
, ,~ . : ,., 'My ~ninr.!.~ ion expues. tl\~~).s,' \'1~'"
'~:.\ ~ \:4LJ u U,-:/c j ': ' .
j,......,.;.~.... Wig..~,/lr.'y hand and official seal.
..', ",.,"-;;'O.',u"."O ,.,\,,(
'!i</'I "'CO.. .",
;<~r,~~~1t/J"li'If""""" .
~+~
Notary Public
"'"'"
Exhibit 'C'
Vicinity Map
(',
;
-------.------..---.-.
(/)
c.~ 'f";"i,
. At'
; ~ ,~\I
;."~:.. ~;-1.-- I
.', '.,)
--~/: 1 Ii
c
c
i~ ~,l
~~~i
~~ ~~
_s::EO
,h~.
.g."g e E
~ . il &
::"2 ii~ s::
J2%0Il OIl 8-
g'0Ilj!: OIl ~
'.~ ,,; -
~~.~5 0
:aitlOl 5"
mlil 0Il..a 0
e- 1Il c: ~
~H~ "
l-O!"Cl 0
~
Q)
u.
CI
~
LU
CI
CI
~
o
o
o
c:-!
..-
~
CI
iA
".,';,;')9;
,
~
....
1-
(/)
....J
I~
Hr:., ~",'
111$.1
,
~
n
~'
Exhibit'D'
Site Improvement Survey
i:
,"{'
......,:',..
;::'.:.
,~ '
~,
\
i
h
~
~.~ "
~~t
d~~
,
~ ~'
d
~l
U
~ ~
~ ~,
H
~ ~
~ ~'
~1I 1I
,~~ ~ ;;-
"
"
f'
.,,t
::2i
Cl..
..c1
+'
co
[,;j
~;'
b
,"",
'0
't->
Jj). ,
,Pi!
,:so, '
~~
r~
"
"
~
~;:.
~
~\,:
:~
!:'c
t,
;:.
~:
\..,
~~iii
~~!l
!j~~
~~
~i
:-
~i,
~'...',
~, '
~.,
k:'
i
if
~.
r
r
r.
.~
li~
h~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~.~~
.' ~~~
"~
"
~
~~~
~h
P
~~.
~ ~\1~
" ~~
~ ~l:i~ "
~ ,~,~~, .~"
~ ,~~~,'~' ~
~ ~~" ~
~ ~~~~
~I'
':l "
..., ""
"',",
1;:'"'
g'~E~o,
SIt.,;!
!$ ~f(to;
,'i!': ,ZOO'"
"~, ~:~i
'"' ",,,,,0'
C),;::aZ
!1 .' Q.
p,:' '''J:!
"" :il",
1il "
"
,
"""
"
"
!
, .
~;u
~~ !1 n"'g
. ",81 ~a;~
~~ ~~.
. -
::~~
R~'
"
.~~
i~el
L.
I
~...--
---- '
,/
~
2
~
""~,
r..;.v,
~.~
;.~
f,jCi,..;,
~ ,. ~
!
g~~~
~~...~
~~~~
J~JS' "
. 7711y
~~~ '
~n
....
'~
..<"
I " .
" ' . I" "
i ' " .." · a
."".".""q ,l 't~ ~"~
, ' " ,:~' ',2,"j, ,~","',:g,-~,. ~ . ".,,'
, ~ ~. "~,, "~ r, ,...
'1,', '.,:,~:,o",},,';!,',.,'.,:,'~,,',~ ll~',,'~'
" :~', ,,1,1'1 ~,l~,j!2 ",~' ,oi '.~~, 0"
.. , ,_ "o~-*,~'" ',. ~
~. ",:' . :!~ _ . ~.", '~B
,"''''',,'',',Ji\',~','',
~"",-
~, '
.?;5l! ",=
~@'
~,,:.i
"
C'
.':,'
"j
!
(
"
"
'g
j
,
I
(.) ~~
~ ~E
00: Cl
~ ~i
z ~!
G ul
z ",'
~ :;:1
(f) U:
0::
0-
o
rIl
,~
n
Exhibit 'E'
Conceptual Design
Drawing
II
""'-""--"'~-------:-~--:--.~'--_.--:.---:---.~--:-----1"'--~"--'-----''.----:--~.".-.~.,--~-.-~--'----.~-~..-.-"-.-"..------"-.--~---.,.,.---------,.~--
I
I
"
'iI\
{ II
rl ·
~ ~.l\
'i~ ~....
" ~1
l ~~~~
,t ..l~~~.,
..~ ~.~" :,~
~~ ~
:~G~ i
~t ~.~ .1
f t f
~ i t
.~ ~ l ~ ~ ~
; f ~ ~ \ ~
~.. ~ --..--l-.~-._..~ ~i
f
.
~
"
i
s',.,:,
' ' I
. '.~
.~:()!
, 'I
" :';;i
"I
'. ~'i
". ,
,"-",;
'~
~ .!
t
., ~
I ~,
8~
/"'''\
1l
,
~.
. . I'\-~
,
~
q
" ~
i !
, k
" ~,
.~ ,~1
~Kl,',,",',,'" '''',:,:,','., at
II ,,"",' .\\_
~ ';,> -Ci
t:' "'; i
\l .0,::,
). ~
"
-l
i ~l ~
~ ~~ ~
I~ ~
1 ~ .~
j -,
~i r
~, t~l
~l~
,h~t ' ..~
'~i~ ,t;
~~, ~ . 1 I~
"~
.~~
~l
~~
~~
~~
, ,
,~ ,~
I"l
t'"")
Exhibit 'F'
Subsoil Evaluation Report
HP Geotech
..
~
,
f)
c~~c!)tech
Hepworth~Pawlak Geotechnical, lne.
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970.945.7988
Fax: 970.945.8454
hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
March 2, 2000
City of Aspen Parks Department
Attn: Scott Chism
130 ,South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Job No. 100 140
Subject:
Subsoil Evaluation, Proposed Skateboard Park at Existing Basketball
Court, Rio Grande Pro;k, North Mill Street and Rio Grande Place,
Aspen, Colorado
Dear Mr. Chism:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil evaluation at
the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for
geotechnical engineering services to the City of Aspen dated January 11, 2000, The
data obtained and our rel;:ommendatiqns bas~d pn.the proposed construction and
subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed skateboard park will involve cuts up to 10 feet
below grade. The skateboard park will be cast-in-place concrete, The sides of the
ramps will act as retaining walls. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are
assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction.
If site grading, construction or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site is an existing basketball court surrounded by landscaped
terraininc1uding aspen and evergreen trees. The terrain is rolling with a slope down to
the north. There is a rugby field to the west and a snow melter facility to the east.
There was about 8 inches of snow cover at the time of our field work.
ji
~
f"""\
I
.
City of Aspen Park Department
, March 2, 2000
Page 2
Field Exploration: The field exploration for the project was conducted on February 3
and 4,2000, Four exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to
evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter
continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted Longyear BK-51HD drill rig.
The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Slotted 1 V2" diameter PVC pipe was installed in 3 of the botings to allow for
monitoring the groundwater level through the spring when the water table will likely be
higher than it is now.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1%inchand2 inch 1.D.spoo~samplers. The
samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound
hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described
by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the
relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken
and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings,
Fig. 2, The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer
and testing.
Subsurface Conditions: Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the
site are shown on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about 5 to 15 feet of clayey to silty
sand and gravel fill overlying relatively dense, slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles
and possible boulders in Borings 1 and 2. Drilling in the dense gravel with auger
equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was
encountered in 14e deposit. The ,fill was underlain by medium dense silty sand in
Borings 3 and 4. The existing fill encountered at the site contains organics and scattered
trash. The depth and extent of the fill areas across the park could vary from that
indicated by the borings.
Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural
moisture content, density and gradation analyses. Total lead content tests were
performed on samples of the fill soils. Total lead content ranged from 159 to 180 ppm.
Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1 V2
inch fraction) of the natural coarse granular soils and existing granular fill soils are
shown on Fig. 4, The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1.
No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils
were slightly moist to very moist.
H-P GEOTECH
, "'''"<\~.
,.r
~'~~ ~('';
1)
t"""'l.
I')
/
Skateboard Park
1, Introduce Scott and Rebecca -representing the Applica;v.1;), the City
Parks Department.
2. This is a public hearing to consider Ordinance #14, Series of2000, _
the Specially Planned Area Review to Build a Skateboard Park and to
Relocate the Basketball Court on Rio Grande Park, Site B
3. The Park is divided into 2 sites: Site A, which is essentially the
portion of the park located north of the bike path; Site B is the
southern half that includes the field, the recycling site, access road to
Site A, and the basketball court triangle.
4, Review Process: in 1993 the PZ and City Council approved the Rio
Grande Master Plan, which served as a Conceptual Plan for the Park.
The Plan requires additional developments to be reviewed as final
SPAs, A final SPA is a 2-step proc~ss, with a recommendation by PZ
~final action by Council. ~
5 \.pZ recom~ded approval of the Skateboard Park by a vote of 5-2 on
April 18. e~-u& lJ::rw..f\i'l.v..M- -( >.......a-~ ~
6. I will ~y discus~e Master Plan, CSfBHH:lfiity D"vde19fH€ll.t ~ I
~frs comments, and PZ's recommendation; Scott will discuss the '
site plan,
7. Staff believes the proposal is consistent with the Rio Grande Master
Plan for the following reasons:
(!\. ~ Recommende,d land uses/activities for Site B -a half-pipe skateboard
ramp is one of the identified activities.
(}) -r. Plan's recommended Actions: (1) The City should work with the
Youth Center to develop more recreational activities on site B; and (2)
The Youth Center and the City should install a half pipe ramp in the
open space between the r~cycle facility and the playing field,
-
tt (~,Site B is relatively flat, contains stable soils, and no utilities other than
an existing electrical line. This site is a relatively small area that will
be incorporated into the overall Civic rpnt~Master PJaIl, schedule to
be completed by late autumn, The Civic Center Plan will address a
permanent location for restroom facilities for this area. Currently
seasonal san-o-Iets are located in the park near the theater, public
restrooms are located across Rio Grande Place in the parking garage
,
~':"'^ ,.;
~
1""\
,
and at the Youth Center, Two more san-o-let enclosures would be
provided near the Skateboard Park for all park users.
II, The proposed park does not include any lighting or new parking
spaces.
12. . Council should be aware that any future rail or trolley fa . ,
wou located in the playing field area to the west 'entified in
the Master , It should also be noted tha an does not
-
designate a Trolle stem as the r the park; rather it lists it as
one possible use the ecifically states that THE CIT . OF
ASPEN SH DECIDE HER A CITY-WIDE TOLLEY
SYS IS APPROPRIATE IN AS This decision ha not yet
bee made and will likely be further explored as p he ity
Center Master Plan.
13.PZ recommendations: 5 members voted for the project although they
have long supported a Trolley System because no development plans
have been proposed and may not be, These members stated that they
do not want this application delayed because it will provide an
immediate, needed recreation amenity for the community youth.
Other members opposed the project because,.,
14.Approved recommendations that the Parks Dept. provide a Trolley
System Overlay on the site for Council's Review, And a condition
that transportation rights for the park be superior to all other rights in
the future, The Parks Dept. will provide the overlay, Staff does not
believe the condition is necessary because the Plan states that,
"Because the site was purchased with th penny transportation funds,
the basis of future development goals is transportation oriented,"
15, Staff supports the Skateboard Park development because it (1) meets
the review criteria; (2) provides an important community recreation
facility; and (3) would be designed in a manner that minimizes its
overall impact on the park, neighborhood, and respects the
transportation use options have been contemplated through the years.
^
~
V\ a.....
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
THRU:
Steve Barwick, City Manager,
John Worcester, City Attorney
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce OWson, Deputy Directo~
Nick Lelack, Planner~
)11; .
-YJ r.J~ if
".J:' 9 ? '--i
f~
Y
.
FROM:
RE:
Specially Planned Area Review to 8uild a Skateboard Park and to
Relocate the 8asketball Court on Rio Grande Park, Site 8 - First
Reading
DATE:
April 24, 2000
"."...._.....,c >_.,,_.,
:'-"-,
SUMMARY: The proposal is to build a 17,000 square foot depressed skateboard park where
the basketball court currently exists and to build a new basketball court in the undeveloped
area shown in the photograph to the right. No new lights or parking will be added, The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval by a 5 to 2 vote on April 18,
. .. ~ A.~-,-':;'j;::.""", ,7
":"c--l":~ ~y I 4~~'~", :..!".~3'''''' ,
:"':J:'~ ~~ ,~v~ I,;\:~~ 4"'-C ;"''>......
,,' ';U::c:.,~, ''',l'_~' ""'~' "','-,>1"
"'~~"" ~.- ~ ~'~'"
, "..._"~"',.,-'~I..11
~~,:- ::~~ _ '''---'
~. \~ ,~:. ".,:-~ ~..
!::". '.. --;:: ~ ~-. ;;' ::"-~- ~-
~~~::.:,;-,; :::: ",::6.-:::-:.
~I~~~!~~~~~
ApPLICANT:
City Parks Department
ZONING:
Public, Specially Planned Area Overlay
REPRESENTATIVES:
Rebecca Shickling, City Parks Deputy Director
Scott Chism, City Parks Planner
LOCATION:
Rio Grande Park, Site B
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Final Specially Planned Area, (SPA) Review: This two step process requires approval of a
development plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, with public
hearings occurring at both, The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend
approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval to the City Council. The Rio Grande
master plan was developed as a conceptual SPA Plan, Following its adoption. new
development or significant alterations must be consistent with this conceptual SPA plan and
be reviewed pursuant to the final SPA development review process,
,~
/~\
STAFF COMMENTS:
The City of Aspen Parks Deparment, ("Applicant"), represented by Scott Chism, Parks
Planner, is requesting approval of a Specially Planned Area Review to build a
skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park. Site B, City
Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission endorsed the Rio Grande Master Plan
in 1993,
Rio Grande Park is divided into two (2) sites, Site A and Site B, Site Aislocated
between the bike path and row oflarge Cottonwoods that edge the playing field, and the
river, It also includes the snow me Iter and the drainage pond closest to Mill Street. Site
B encompasses the recycle site, access road to Site A, the triangle of open space between
the access road and bike/pedestrian path, and the playing field, It is bordered by Rio
Grande Drive, Mill Street, and a row of Cottonwoods and the bike/pedestrian path to the
north, The proposed skateboard park would be'located on Site B in the open space
triangle, which currently contains a basketball court and open space.
The Master Plan outlines recommended land uses/activities for Site B, A half-pipe
skateboard ramp is identified as one of the activities intended for this parcel (page
16), Although the proposed skateboard park is larger than a half-pipe ramp, the proposed
skateboard park is consistent with the Master Plan and conceptual review, Site B is
relatively flat, and contains stable soils and no utilities other than an existing electrical
line,
Site B is a relatively small area that will be incorporated into the overall Civic Center
Master Plan, scheduled to be completed by late autumn, The Civic Center Master Plan
will designate a location for permanent restroom facilities for the playing field,
skateboard park, theater, and basketball court, Currently, seasonal san-o-Iets are located
in the park near the theater, This proposal includes the provision of two more san-o-let
enclosures for all park users, In addition, public restrooms are located across Rio Grande
Place in the parking garage and Youth Center.
Key skateboard park elements include the following elements:
. The centerpiece of the proposal is a 17,000 square foot, "L-shape," in-ground,
concrete skateboard park containing areas for all skill levels, Building concrete
, structures below the natural grade would minimize the noise and visual impacts of
the skateboard park,
. The basketball court would be relocated to the north with better sun exposure,
. The existing drinking fountain would be relocated to the plaza space; the plaza
space would serve as the park entry,
. A 35-foot buffer zone south of the Rio Grande Trail would be created, exceeding
the 20-foot buffer zone outlined in the master plan,
. No new parking spaces would be created,
. No new lights would be added to the park,
The Commission should also be aware that any future rail or trolley facility would be
located in the playing field area to the west as identified in the Master Plan,
2
1""\
';:,.J':;~~X)",;',;~
On April 18, the Planning and Zoning Coriilliissionvotecl5to 210 recommend that
City Council approve of the Specially Planned Area Review for the skateboard
park with conditions, A couple of Commissioners and one member of the public, John
Bush, raised concerns over how the proposed development of the new skateboard park,
relocated basketball court, and landscaping would affect the development of a Trolley
System (tracks and poles, car barn facility, trolley cars, etc,), Specifically, these
members opposed the application because the site pilin did not indicate how a Trolley
System could function on this site juxtaposed totheskateboal'd park and basketball
court; therefore, they did not believe they could make an informed decision,
Other Commissioners explained that, although they have long supported the concept of
a Trolley System, no development plans for it have been proposed and may not be
proposed for the next 10, 20, or even 50 years. These members stated that they do not
want this application delayed because it will provide an immediate, needed recreation
amenity for the community's youth, These members strongly support the application,
The Commission approved a recommendation that the Parks Department provide a
Trolley System overlay on the site plan for Council's review, and that transportation
rights for the park shall be superior to all other rights in the future, The Trolley
System overlay will be presented to City Council at the public hearing for this
application on May 8,
Community Development Staff supports the proposed skateboard park development
because it (1) meets the review criteria. (2) provides an important community
recreation facility, and (3) would be designed in a manner that minimizes its overall
impact on the park, the neighborhood. and respects the transportation use options that
have been contemplated through the years for this site,
RECOMMENDA nON:
Staffis recommending approval of the Specially Planned Area Review to build
a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park,
Site B, with the following conditions:
1, All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect.
2, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained,
3, Currently, the fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present
basketball courts, The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will allow
for the continuation of these demonstration classes,
4, The Applicant shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric
Department,
5, The Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park,
3
~
/...\
6, A water spigot for the cJeanout of the area should be provided, It may be possible to
use the irrigation lines if there is no change i,n the back flow,
7, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed rock
or other style mud rack must be installed on site during construction,
8, Prior to Construction:
a, The Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for the removal oftrees on site,
b, The Applicant shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan for
the site, Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficial to use the flood
routing concept which would control the water flow from drainage through
depressions in the landscaping,
(~ransportation rights for the ~o Grande Park, Site B, shall be superior to all other rights
'On the future,
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve the Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to
relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, with the conditions in the draft
ordinance, "
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings
Exhibit B Development Application
Exhibit C -- Referral Agency Comments
C:\home\nickJ\Active Cases\Rio Grand SPA Skateboard Park Amendment\Rio Grarde SPA Amendment CC first read.doc
4
~
(~
ORDINANCE NO. it
(SERlES OF 2000)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO, APPROVING THE SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA REVIEW TO
BUILD A SKATEBOARD PARK AND RELOCATE THE EXISTING
BASKETBALL COURT ON RIO GRANDE PARK, SITEB, CITY OF ASPEN,
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2737-073-06-851
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the City of Aspen Parks Department for a Specially PlaMed Area Review to build a
skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B; and,
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No, 42, Series of 1993 approved the Rio
Grande Master Plan; and, ,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rio Grande Master Plan and applicable provisions
of the Municipal Code, development review for site specific projects for theRio Grande
parcels shall be reviewed through the Specially PlaMed Area development review; and,
WHEREAS, the Rio Grande Master Plan identifies a half-pipe skateboard ramp
can be located on Rio Grande Park, Site B; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.440 of the Land Use Code, City Council
may approve a Specially Planned Area Review during a duly noticed public hearing after
considering a recommendation from the PlaMing and Zoning Commission made at a
duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from
the Community Development Director, and recommendatipns f~om relevant referral
agencies; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 18, 2000, the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a five to two (5-2) vote, approval of
a Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball
court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, with conditions contained herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City
Water Department, City Engineering, and the Community Development Department
reviewed the Project and recommended approval with conditions; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development
proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code ,as identified hen:in, has
reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the
Community Development Director, the applicable referral agenCies, and has taken and
considered public comment at a public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council fmds that the development proposal meets or exceeds
all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposaL
with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community
Plan; and,
---,
,~,
WHEREAS, the City Council fmds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for
the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1
The Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to relocate the
basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, is approved with the following conditions:
I, All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect.
2, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained,
3, Currently, the fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present
basketball courts, The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will
allow for the continuation of these demonstration classes,
4, The Applicant shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric
Department,
5, The Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park,
6, A water spigot for the cleanout of the area should be provided, It may be possible
to use the irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow,
7, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed
rock or other style mud rack must be installed on site during construction,
8, Prior to Construction:
a, The Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for the removal of trees on site,
b, The Applicant shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan
for the site, Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficial to use the
flood routing concept which would control the water flow from drainage
through depressions in the landscaping,
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authoriz.ed entity,
,-.,
,
f"l
Section 3:
This Ordinance shaH not effect any existing litigation and shaH not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shaH be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances,
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shaH not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law,
by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 24th day of April, 2000,
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
Rachel Richards, Mayor
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 8th day of May, 2000,
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
Rachel Richards, Mayor
Approved as to form:
John Worcestor, City Attorney
~
,..r--\
EXHIBIT A
RIO GRANDE SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA REVIEW
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
26.440.050, Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA).
In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final
development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider
the following: '
1. Wlletller tile proposed development is compatible witll or enllances tile
mix of development in tile immediate vicinity of tile parcel in terms of land use,
density, lIeigllt, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space.
Staff Finding
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed skateboard park is compatible with and enhances
the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use,
density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space, The proposed
development would be located in the Rio Grande Park, The skateboard park would
enhance the mix of recreation activities in and around the park, which include a large
playing field, basketball court, bike/pedestrian paths, and fly fishing in the Roaring Fork
River,
A wide-range of land uses exist in the immediate vicinity, including civic, institutional,
commercial, office, recreational, retail, and light industrial uses, This development would
add to the eclectic mix of uses in and around the area,
The proposal is to build depressed concrete structures, The height, bulk and architecture
are compatible with the park and its surroundings, Landscaping will be provided to
create a "canopy effect" around the depressed structures, and open space will be
maintained to the greatest extent practicable,
A half-pipe skateboard ramp is identified as one of the activities intended for this parcel
in the Rio Grande Master Plan, Although the proposed skateboard consists of more
structures than a half-pipe ramp, the structures are depressed, The proposed development
is consistent with the Rio Grande Master Plan and conceptual review approval. This
criterion is addressed,
2. Wlletller sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service tile
proposed development.
Staff Finding
Adequate roads exist to service the proposed skateboard park, Access to this park feature
is provided by Rio Grande Place as well as the stairs connecting Rio Grande Place to
Galena Street, RFT A and the Galena Street Shuttle service this area,
1
.-"
t)
Currently, seasonal san-o-Iets are located in ,the park near the theater. This proposal
includes the provision of two more san-o-Iet enclosures for all park users, In addition,
public restrooms are located across Rio Grande Place in the parking garage and Youth
Center. The Civic Center Master Plan will designate a location for permanent restroom
facilities for the playing field, skateboard park, theater, and basketball court,
The existing drinking fountain would be relocated to a new plaza serving as the park's
entrance, An existing conduit, or electrical line, would be relocated as part of this
development. Parking impacts are not expected to be significant since the nature of
skateboarding is transportation and recreation; it is likely that skateboarders will arrive at
the park on their skateboards, by bus, or on foot. This criterion is addressed,
3. Wltetlter tlte parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for
development, considering tlte slope, ground instability and the possibility of
mudj1ow, rockfalls, avalanche dangers andj100d hazards.
Staff Finding
Staff believes Site B is suitable for the development of a skateboard park, The
Applicant has stated that the soils are stable and has provided a Geo-technical report
documenting this finding, This site is not susceptible to mud flow. rock falls,
avalanche dangers, or flood hazards, This criterion is met.
4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning
techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental
impacts and provide open space, trails and simi/aramenitiesfor the users of the
project and the public at large.
Staff Finding
Staff believes the proposed development employs exceptional land planning techniques
in this design, Depressing the concrete structures preserves all view planes, avoids
adverse environmental impacts, and minimizes potential visual and noise impacts, The
design also preserves open space, trails, and all park amenities for users and the public at
large, In addition, the basketball court would be relocated to maximize sun exposure, and
new park amenities would be provided, including the skateboard park and more san-o-
lets. And, the provision of a 35-foot buffer from the Rio Grande Trail exceeds the 20-
foot recommendation in the Master Plan, Further, the proposal provides structures for
skateboarders of all levels, and separates the beginners from the experts for safety and
enjoyment reasons, This criterion is met.
5. Whether the proposed developmellt is in compliance with the Aspen
Area Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Finding
Although the AACP does not address expanding recreational opportunities in town, the
location of the proposed skateboard park is consistent with many AACP goals, For
example, the park is located in the center of to\\o11, making it accessible by alternative
2
~,
modes of transportation such as by bus, bike, skateboard, or on foot, The plan also calls
for creating mixed use developments, and this park will enhance the variety of land uses
that already exist on Rio Grande Park and in the immediate vicinity, Staff believes this
criterion is addressed,
6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of
excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the
surrounding neighborhood.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive
public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood,
City Council has appropriated funds for all aspects of the project out of the Parks
Department budget, This criterion is addressed,
7. Whether proposed development 011 slopes in excess of twellty (20)
perce/It meet the slope reduction alld dellsity requirements of Sectioll
26.445.040(B)(2).
Staff Finding
The slopes do not exceed 20%; this criterion is not applicable,
8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed
development.
StaffFinding
No GMQS allotments are required for this project; this criterion is not applicable,
,
~
r>,
,.'-""
'3
MEMORANDUM
To: Nick Lelack, Planner
From: Ben Ludlow, Project Engineer
Reference DRC Caseload Coordinator
Date: April 6, 2000
Re: Rio Grande Skateboard Park SPA Amendment
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Holy Cross Rezoning and PUD
application at their March 29, 2000 meeting, and has compiled the following; comments:
General
I, Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we believe
that the submitted site plan is accurate, that it shows all site features, and that it is feasible,
The wording must be carried forward exactly as written unless prior consent is received from
the Engineering Department. This is to alleviate problems related to approvals tied to
"issuance of building permit."
2, R.O.W. Impacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-of-way,
the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment license
requirements,
Site Review
I, Site Drainage - Requirement - A drainage report was not submitted with the
application, The site development approvals must include the requirement meeting runoff
design standards of the Land Use Code at Sec, 26,580,020.A.6,a and a requirement that, prior
to the building permit application, a drainage mitigation plan (24"x36" size plan sheet or on
the lot grading plan) must meet the requirements of the Engineering Department Interim
Design Standards and must be submitted for review. and approval by the Engineering
Department. The mitigation plan must also address the temporary sediment control and
containment plan for the construction phase, If drywdls are an acceptable solution for site
drainage, a soils report must be provided with a percolation test to verify the feasibility of
this type of system. Drywells have depths well below depth of frost (10' minimum) to
function in cold weather. The drainage plan must contain a statement specifying the routine
maintenance required by property owner(s) to ensure continued and proper performance,
Drywells may not be placed within public right of way or utility easements, The foundation
drainage system should be separate from storm drainage, must be detained and routed on site,
and must he shown on drainage plims prior to application for building permit, the drainage
may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report demonstrates that the
percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design storm,
""'""
f'\
Information - The City drainage criteria needs to be implemented, This
includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabilization, and vegetation disturbance,
Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the drainage will flow and what adverse affects
may arise from potential mud and debris flow,
2, Community Development - Information - The following request was provided
by the Planning Department:
a, Real bathrooms instead of san-o-lets would highly be desired,
b, If no bathroom facilities are placed, then preparing for future bathrooms will be
beneficial.
c, Recreation classes for skateboard instruction would be beneficial.
3, Fire Protection District - Information - The following information has been
provided by the Aspen Fire Protection District:
a, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre needs to be maintained,
b, Currently the fire extinguisher demo is performed on the present basketball
courts, This needs to be taken in consideration while designing the surface for a
new court,
4, Streets Department - Requirement - As of the request of the Streets Department
revisions need to be made as follows:
a, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed
rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction,
5, Parks - Requirement - The following information has been provided by the
Parks Department:
a, A tree removal permit will be required,
6, Engineering - Information - The following requirements have been provided by
the Engineering Department:
a, There will be a lot of drainage that needs to be controlled, Therefore it would
be beneficial to use the flood routing concept which would control the water
flow from drainage through depressions in the landscaping,
7. Utilities:
Water:
City Water Department - Information - The following information was given by
the City of Aspen Water Department: '
a, Water facilities to the drinking fountain will have to be installed,
2
~
f)
b, A water spigot for the cleanout of the area would be desirable and would
need to have lines properly installed, It may be possible to use the
irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow,
c, Lines should be placed for future plans of building bathrooms,
Wastewater:
Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Information - As a request of the
Consolidated Waste District, revisions need to be made as follows:
a, A set of drainage plans needs to be provided to Peg at ACSD so that an
estimate of fees can be processed, '
Electric:
City of Aspen Electric Department - Information - As a request of the Electric
department, the following items should be noted:
a, There is a conduit that would have to be moved before digging of the
deeper bowl areas,
b, Other conduit needs to be installed now for future expansion,
Construction:
Work in the Public Right of Way - Requirement - Given the continuous problems
of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private
property, we advise the applicant as follows:
Approvals
I, Engineering:
The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering Department
(920-5080) for design of improvements, including grading, drainage,
transportation/streets, landscaping, and encroachments within public
right of way,
2, Parks:
The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920-
5 I 20) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance,
3, Streets:
The applicant receives approval from the Streets department (920-
5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on streets,
and alleyways,
4, Permits:
Obtain R,O,W, permits for any work or development, involving street
cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department.
o
~
DRC Attendees
Staff: Mark O'Meara
Ed Van Walraven
Ben Ludlow
Nick Adeh
John Krueger
Joyce Ohlson
Tom Bracewell
Nick Lelack
Scott Chism
Julie Ann Woods
Tom Bracewell
-"'"
Applicant's Representative:
r,
Parks Depl.
4
^
n
V\ a-.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
RE:
Steve Barwick, City Manager
John Worcester, City Attorney
Julie Ann, Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director.JA:o
Nick Lelack, Planner~
Specially Planned Area Review to Build a Skateboard Park and to
Relocate the Basketball Court on Rio Grande, Park, Site B - First
Reading
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
April 24, 2000
SUMMARY: The proposal is to build a 17,000 square foot depressed skateboard park where
the basketball court currently exists and to build a new basketball court in the undeveloped
area shown in the photograph to the right. No new lights or parking will be added, The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval by a 5 to 2 vote on April 18,
ApPLICANT:
City Parks Department
ZONING:
Public, Specially Planned Area Overlay
REPRESENTATIVES:
Rebecca Shickling, City Parks Deputy Director
Scott Chism, , City Parks Planner
LOCATION:
Rio Grande Park, Site B
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Final Specially Planned Area (SPA) Review: This two step process requires approval of a
development plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, with public
hearings occurring at both, The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend
approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval to the City Council. The Rio Grande
master plan was developed as a conceptual SPA Plan, Following its adoption, new
development or significant alterations must be consistent with this conceptual SPA plan and
be reviewed pursuant to the final SPA development review process,
I
,...."
~ ;1
n
STAFF COMMENTS:
The City of Aspen Parks Deparment, ("Applicant"), represented by Scott Chism, Parks
Planner, is requesting approval of a Specially Planned Area Review to build a
skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B. City
Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission endorsed the Rio Grande Master Plan
in 1993,
Rio Grande Park is divided into two (2) sites, Site A and Site B, Site A is located
between the bike path and row of large Cottonwoods that edge the playing field, and the
river. It also includes the snow melter and the drainage pond closest to Mill Street. Site
B encompasses the recycle site, access road to Site A, the triangle of open space between
the access road and bike/pedestrian path, and the playing field, It is bordered by Rio
Grande Drive, Mill Street, and a row of Cottonwoods and the bike/pedestrian path to the
north, The proposed skateboard park would be'located on Site B in the open space
triangle, which currently contains a basketball court and open space.
The Master Plan outlines recommended land uses/activities for Site B, A half-pipe
skateboard ramp is identified as one of the activities intended for this parcel (page
16), Although the proposed skateboard park is larger than a half-pipe ramp, the proposed
skateboard park is consistent with the Master Plan and conceptual review, Site B is
relatively flat, and contains stable soils and no utilities other than an existing electrical
line,
Site B is a relatively small area that will be incorporated into the overall Civic Center
Master Plan, scheduled to be completed by late autumn, The Civic Center Master Plan
will designate a location for permanent restroom facilities for the playing field,
skateboard park, theater, and basketball court, Currently, seasonal san-o-Iets are located
in the park near the theater. This proposal includes the provision of two more san-o-Iet
enclosures for all park users, In addition, public restrooms are located across Rio Grande
Place in the parking garage and Youth Center.
Key skateboard park elements includethe following elements:
. The centerpiece of the proposal is a 17,000 square foot, "L:shape," in-ground,
concrete skateboard park containing areas for all skill levels, Building concrete
structures below the natural grade would minimize the noise and visual impacts of
the skateboard park,
. The basketball court would be relocated to the north with better sun exposure,
. The existing drinking fountain would be relocated to the plaza space; the plaza
space would serve as the park entry,
. A 35-foot buffer zone south of the Rio Grande Trail would be created, exceeding
the 20- foot buffer zone outlined in the master plan,
. No new parking spaces would be created,
. No new lights would be added to the park,
The Commission should also be aware that any future rail or trolley facility would be
located in the playing field area to the west as identified in the Master Plan,
2
f'\
()
"
On April 18, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 2 to recommend that
City Council approve of the Specially Planned Area Review for the skateboard'
park with conditions, A couple of Commissioners and one member of the public, John
Bush, raised concerns over how the proposed development of the new skateboard park,
relocated basketball court, and landscaping would affect the development of a Trolley
System (tracks and poles, car barn facility, trolley cars, etc,), Specifically, these
members opposed the application because the site plan did not indicate how a Trolley
System could function on this site juxtaposed to the skateboard park and basketball
court; therefore, they did not believe they could make an informed decision,
Other Commissioners explained that, although they have long supported the concept of
a Trolley System, no development plans for it have been proposed and may not be
proposed for the next 10, 20, or even 50 years, These members stated that they do not
want this application delayed because it will provide an immediate, needed recreation
amenity for the community's youth, These members strongly support the application,
The Commission approved a recommendation that the Parks Department provide a
Trolley System overlay on the site plan for Council's review, and that transportation
rights for the park shall be superior to all other rights in the future, The Trolley
, System overlay will be presented to City Council at the public hearing for this
application on May 8,
Community Development Staff supports the proposed skateboard park development
because it (1) meets the review criteria, (2) provides an important community
recreatiOn facility, and (3) would be designed in a manner that minimizes its overall
impact on the park, the neighborhood, and respects the transportation use options that
have been contemplated through the years for this site,
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval of the Specially Planned Area Review to build
a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park,
Site B, with the following conditions:
1, All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect.
2, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained,
3, Currently, the fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present
basketball courts, The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will allow
for the continuation of these demonstration classes,
4, The Applicant shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric
Department.
5, The Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park,
3
/""",
n
6, A water spigot for the cleanout of the area should be provided, It may be possible to
use the irrigation lines if there is no change i,n the back flow,
7, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed rock
or other style mud rack must be installed on site during construction,
8, Prior to Construction:
a, The Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for the removal of trees on site,
b, The Applicant shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan for
the site, Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficial to use the flood
routing concept which would control the water flow from drainage through
depressions in the landscaping,
9, Transportation rights for the Rio Grande Park, Site B, shall be superior to all other rights
in the future,
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve the Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to
relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, with the conditions in the draft
ordinance,"
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and StaffFindings
Exhibit B Development Application
Exhibit C -- Referral Agency Comments
C:\home\nickl\Active Cases\Rio Grand SPA Skateboard Park Amendment\Rio Grande SPA Amendment CC first read.doc
4
r"\
,'-'
t.. J
ORDINANCE NO. ii
(SERIES OF 2000)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO, APPROVING THE SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA REVIEW TO
BUILD A SKATEBOARD PARK ANI) ,RE:LOCATE TH]j; EXISTING
BASKETBALL COURT ONRIQ GRANI)E PARK, SITE B, CITY OF ASPEN,
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2737-073-06-851
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the City of Aspen Parks Department for a Specially Planned Area Review to build a
skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B; and,
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No, 42, Series of 1993 approved the Rio
Grande Master Plan; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rio Grande Master Plan and applicable provisions
, of the Municipal Code, development review for site specific projects for the Rio Grande
parcels shall be reviewed through the Specially Planned Area development review; and,
WHEREAS, the Rio Grande Master Plan identifies a half-pipe skateboard ramp
can be located on Rio Grande Park, Site B; and,
WHEREAS, pUrsuant to Section 26.440 of the Land Use Code, City Council
may approve aSpecially Planned Area Review during a duly noticed public hearing after
considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a
duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from
the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral
agencies; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 18, 2000, the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a five to two (5-2) vote, approval of
a Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball
court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, with conditions contained herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City
Water Department, City Engineering, and the Community Development Department
reviewed the Project and recommended approval with conditions; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development
proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has
reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the
Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and
considered public comment at a public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds
all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal,
with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community
Plan; and,
r\
~
t )
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for
the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT:
Section 1
The Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to relocate the
basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, is approved with the following conditions:
1, All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect,
2, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained,
3, Currently, the fIre extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present
basketball courts, The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will
allow for the continuation of these demonstration classes,
4, The Applicant shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric
Department,
5, The Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park,
6, A water spigot for the cleanout of the area should be provided, It may be possible
to use the irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow,
7, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed
rock or other style mud rack must be installed on site during construction,
8, Prior to Construction:
a, The Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit' for the removal of trees on site,
b, The Applicant shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan
for the site, Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is benefIcial to use the
flood routing concept which would control the water flow from drainage
through depressions in the landscaping,
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as iffully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity,
r,
n.
Section 3:
This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances,
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLlSlIED as provided by law,
by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 24th day of April, 2000,
Attest:
RachelFUchards,~ayor
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 8th day of May, 2000,
Attest:
RacheIFUchards,~ayor
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
John Worcestor, City Attorney
r,
(j
EXHIBIT A
RIo GRANDE SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA REVIEW
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
26.440.050, Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA).
In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final
development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider
the following:
1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the
mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use,
density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space.
Staff Finding
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed skateboard park is compatible with and enhances
the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use,
density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space, The proposed
development would be located in the Rio Grande Park. The skateboard park would
enhance the mix of recreation activities in and around the park, which include a large
playing field, basketball court, bike/pedestrian paths, and fly fishing in the Roaring Fork
River.
A wide-range of land uses exist in the immediate vicinity, including civic, institutional,
commercial, office, recreational, retail, and light industrial uses, This development would
add to the eclectic mix of uses in and around the area,
The proposal is to build depressed concrete structures, The height, bulk and architecture
are compatible with the park and its surroundings, Landscaping will be provided to
create a "canopy effect" around the depressed structures, and open space will be
maintained to the greatest extent practicable,
A half-pipe skateboard ramp is identified as one of the activities intended for this parcel
in the Rio Grande Master Plan, Although the proposed skateboard consists of more
structures than a half-pipe ramp, the structures are depressed, The proposed development
is consistent with the Rio Grande Master Plan and conceptual review approval. This
criterion is addressed,
2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the
proposed development.
Staff Finding
Adequate roads exist to service the proposed skateboard park. Access to this park feature
is provided by Rio Grande Place as well as the stairs connecting Rio Grande Place to
Galena Street. RFT A and the Galena Street Shuttle service this area,
1
~
r""'"\
r .. ,~"
'/
Currently, seasonal san-o-lets are located in the park near the theater. This proposal
includes the provision of two more san-o-let enclosures for all park users, In addition,
public restrooms are located across Rio Grande Place. in the parking garage and Youth
Center. The Civic Center Master Plan will designate a location for permanent restroom
facilities for the playing field, skateboard park, theater, and basketball court,
The existing drinking fOlmtain would be relocated to a new plaza serving as the park's
entrance, An existing conduit, or electrical line, would' be relocated as part of this
development, Parking impacts are not expected to be significant since the nature of
skateboarding is transportation and recreation; it is likely that skateboarders will arrive at
the park on their skateboards, by bus, or on foot. This criterion is addressed,
3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for
development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of
mudflow, rockfalls, avalanche dangers andflood hazards.
Staff Finding
Staff believes Site B is suitable for the development of a skateboard park, The
Applicant has stated that the soils are stable and has provided a Geo-technical report
documenting this finding, This site is not susceptible to mud flow, rock falls.
avalanche dangers, or flood hazards, This criterion is met.
4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning
techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental
impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the
project and the public at large.
Staff Finding
Staff believes the proposed development employs exceptional land planning techniques
in this design, Depressing the concrete structures preserves all view planes, avoids
adverse environmental impacts, and minimizes potential visual and noise impacts, The,
design also preserves open space, trails, and all park amenities for users and the public at
large, In addition, the basketball court would be relocated to maximize sun exposure, and
new park amenities would be provided, including the skateboard park and more san-o-
lets, And, the provision of a 35-foot buffer from the Rio Grande Trail exceeds the 20-
foot recommendation in the Master Plan, Further, the proposal provides structures for
skateboarders of all levels, and separates the beginners from the experts for safety and
enjoyment reasons, This criterion is met.
5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen
Area Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Finding
Although the AACP does not address expanding recreational opportunities in town, the
location of the proposed skateboard park is consistent with many AACP goals, For
example, the park is located in the center of town, making it accessible by alternative
2
1'*"\,
n
modes of transportation such as by bus, bike, skateboard, or on foot. The plan also calls
for creating mixed use developments, and this park will enhance the variety of land uses
that already exist on Rio Grande Park and in the immediate vicinity, Staff believes this
criterion is addressed,
6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of
excessive public funds to ,provide public facilities for the parcel, or the
surrounding neighborhood.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive
public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood,
City Council has appropriated funds for all aspects of the project out of the Parks
Department budget. This criterion is addressed,
7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20)
percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section
26.445.040(B)(2).
Staff Finding
The slopes do not exceed 20%; this criterion is not applicable,
8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed
development.
Staff Finding
No GMQS allotments are required for this project; this criterion is not applicable,
3
~
MEMORANDUM
To: Nick Lelack, Planner
From: Ben Ludlow, Project Engineer
Reference DRC Caseload Coordinator
Date: April 6, 2000
Re: Rio Grande Skateboard Park SPA Amendment
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Holy Cross Rezoning and PUD
application at their March 29, 2000 meeting, and has compiled the following comments:
General
1, Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we believe
that the submitted site plan is accurate, that it shows all site features, and that it is feasible,
The wording must be carried forward exactly as written unless prior consent is received from
the Engineering Department. This is to alleviate problems related to approvals tied to
"issuance of building permit."
2, R.O.W. Impacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-of-way,
the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment license
requirements,
Site Review
1, Site Drainage - Requirement - A drainage report was not submitted with the
application, The site development approvals must include the requirement meeting runoff
design standards of the Land Use Code at Sec, 26,580,020,A.6,a and a requirement that, prior
to the building permit application, a drainage mitigation plan (24"x36" size plan sheet or on
the lot grading plan) must meet the requirements of the Engineering Department Interim
Design Standards and must be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering
Department. The mitigation plan must also address the temporary sediment control and
containment plan for the construction phase, If drywells are an acceptable solution for site
drainage, a soils report must be provided with a percolation test to verify the feasibility of
this type of system, Drywells have depths well below depth of frost (10' minimum) to
function in cold weather. The drainage plan must contain a statement specifying the routine
maintenance required by property owner(s) to ensure continued and proper performance,
Drywells may not be placed within public right of way or utility easements, The foundation
drainage system should be separate from storm drainage, must be detained and routed on site,
and must be shown on drainage plans prior to application for building permit. The drainage
may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report demonstrates that the
percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design storm,
1
(""\
~
Information - The City drainage criteria needs to be implemented, This
includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabilization, and vegetation disturbance,
Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the drainage will flow and what adverse affects
may arise from potential mud and debris flow,
2, Community Development - Information - The following request was provided
by the Planning Department:
a, Real bathrooms instead of san-o-lets would highly be desired,
b, If no bathroom facilities are placed, then preparing for future bathrooms will be
beneficial,
c, Recreation classes for skateboard instruction would be beneficial,
3, Fire Protection District - Information - The following information has been
provided by the Aspen Fire Protection District:
a, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre needs to be maintained,
b, Currently the fire extinguisher demo is performed on the present basketball
courts, This needs to be tal,en in consideration while designing the surface for a
new court,
4, Streets Department - Requirement - As of the request of the Streets Department
revisions need to be made as follows:
a, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed
rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction,
5, Parks - Requirement - The following information has been provided by the
Parks Department:
a, A tree removal permit will be required,
6, Engineering - Information - The following requirements have been provided by
the Engineering Department:
a, There will be a lot of drainage that needs to be controlled, Therefore it would
be beneficial to use the flood routing concept which would control the water
flow from drainage through depressions in the landscaping,
7, Utilities:
Water:
City Water Department - Information - The following information was given by
the City of Aspen Water Department:
a, Water facilities to the drinking fountain will have to be installed,
2
A
"
,
b, A water spigot for the cleanout of the area would be desirable and would
need to have lines properly installed, It may be possible to use the
irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow,
c, Lines should be placed for future plans of building bathrooms,
Wastewater:
Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Informati?1l __, As a request of the
Consolidated Waste District, revisions need to be made as follows:
a, A set of drainage plans needs to be provided to Peg at ACSD so that an
estimate of fees can be processed,
Electric:
City of Aspen Electric Department - Information - As a request of the Electric
department, the following items should be noted:
a, There is a conduit that would have to be moved before digging of the
deeper bowl areas,
b, Other conduit needs to be installed now for future expansion,
Construction:
Work in the Public Right of Way - Requirement - Given the continuous problems
of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private
property, we advise the applicant as follows:
Approvals
1. Engineering:
The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering Department
(920-5080) for design of improvements, including grading, drainage,
transportation/streets, landscaping, and encroachments within public
right of way,
2, Parks:
The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920-
5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance,
3, Streets:
The applicant receives approval from the Streets department (920-
5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on streets,
and alleyways,
4, Permits:
Obtain R,O,W, permits for any work or development, involving street
cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department,
3
DRC Attendees
Staff: Mark O'Meara
Ed Van Walraven
Ben Ludlow
Nick Adeh
John Krueger
Joyce Ohlson
Tom Bracewell
Nick Lelack
Scott Chism
Julie Ann Woods
Tom Bracewell
t)
Applicant's Representative:
tl
,
Parks Dept,
4
r.,
A
c,.., ...j
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
THRU: Joyce Ohlson, DeputyDirecto~
FROM: Nick Lelack, Planner ~~
RE: Specially Planned Area Review to Build a Skateboard Parkand to Relocate
the Basketball Court on Rio Grande Park, Site B - Public Hearing
DATE: April 18, 2000
SUMMARY:
The proposal is to build a 17,000 square foot depressed skateboard park where the basketball
court currently exists and to build a new basketball court in the undeveloped area shown in
the photograph to the right, No new lights or parking will be added,
ApPLICANT:
City Parks Department
ZONING:
Public, Specially Planned Area Overlay
REPRESENTATIVE:
Rebecca ShickIing, City Parks Deputy Director
Scott Chism, City Parks Planner
LOCATION:
Rio Grande Park, Site B
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
Final Specially Planned Area (SPA) Review: This two step process requires approval of a
development plan by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, with public '
hearings occurring at both, The Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend
approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval to the City Council. The Rio Grande
master plan was developed as a conceptual SPA Plan, Following its adoption, new
development or significant alterations must be consistent with this conceptual SPA plan and
be reviewed pursuant. to the final SPA development review process,
I
"'"'"
i~
,Y
STAFF COMMENTS:
The City of Aspen Parks Deparment, ("Applicant"), represented by Scott Chism, Parks
Planner, is requesting approval of a Specially Planned Area Review to build a
skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B. City
Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission endorsed the Rio Grande Master Plan
in 1993,
Rio Grande Park is divided into two (2) sites, Site A and Site B, Site A is located
between the bike path and row of large Cottonwoods that edge the playing field, and the
river. It also includes the snow melter and the drainage pond closest to Mill Street. Site
B encompasses the recycle site, access road to Site A, the triangle of open space between
the access road and bike/pedestrian path, and the playing field, It is bordered by Rio
Grande Drive, Mill Street, and a row of Cottonwoods and the bike/pedestrian path to the
north, The proposed skateboard park would be located on Site B in the open space
triangle, which currently contains a basketball court and open space.
The Master Plan, outlines recommended land uses/i'ictivities for Sit~ B" ,A half-pipe
skateboard ramp is identified as one ofthe activities intended for this parcel (page
16), Although the proposed skateboard park is larger than a half-pipe ramp, the proposed
skateboard park is consistent with the Master Plan and conceptual review, Site B is
relatively flat, and contains stable soils and no utilities other than an existing electrical
line,
Site B is relatively small area that will be incorporated into the overall Civic Center
Master Plan, scheduled to be completed by late autumn, The Civic Center Master Plan
will designate a location for permanent restroom facilities for the playing field,
skateboard park, theater, and basketball court, Currently, seasonal san-o-lets are located
in the park near the theater. This proposal includes the provision oftwo more san-o-let
enclosures for all park users, In addition, public restrooms are located across Rio Grande
Place in the parking garage and Youth Center,
Key skateboard park elements include the following elements:
. The centerpiece of the proposal is a 17,000 square foot, "L-shape," in-ground,
concrete skateboard park containing areas for all skill levels, Building concrete
structures below the natural grade would minimize the noise and visual impacts of
the skateboard park,
. The basketball court would be relocated to the north with better sun exposure,
. The existing drinking fountain would be relocated to the plaza space; the plaza
space would serve as the park entry,
. A 35-foot buffer zone south ofthe Rio Grande Trail woul4 be created, exceeding
the 20- foot buffer zone outlined in the master plan,
. No new parking spaces would be created,
. No new lights would be added to the park.
The Commission should also be aware that any future rail or trolley facility would be
located in the playing field area to the west as identified in the Master Plan,
2
r-"
,t')
,. eji
Community Development Staff supports the proposed skateboard park development
because it meets the review criteria, provides an important community recreation
facility, and would be designed in a manner that minimizes its overall impact on the
park and the neighborhood,
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval of the Specially Planned Area Review to build
a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park,
Site B, with the following conditions:
1, All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect.
2, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained,
3, Currently, the fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present
basketball courts, The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will allow
for the continuation of these demonstration classes,
4, The Applicant shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric
Department.
5, The Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park,
6, A water spigot for the c1eanout of the area should be provided, It may be possible to
use the irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow,
7, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed rock
or other style mud rack must be installed on site during construction,
8, Prior to Construction:
a, The Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for the removal of trees on site,
b, The Applicant shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan for
the site, Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficial to use the flood
routing concept which would control the water flow from drainage through
depressions in the landscaping,
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve the Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to
relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, with the conditions in the draft
resolution, "
3
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
('"",
Review Criteria and Staff Findings
Development Application
Referral Agency Comments
,"""""
~;. ".J
C:\home\nickl\Active Cases\Rio Grand SPA Skateboard Park Amendment\Rio Grande SPA Amendment.doc
4
"'"'"
(""\
, J
RESOLUTION NO. dJ
(SERIES OF 2000)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE .
SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA REVIEW TO BUILD A.SI(A'fE~()A@ .PARK
AND RELOCATE THE, EXISTING BA.SKET.BALL COURT ON RIO GRANDE
PARK, SITE B, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2737-073-06-851
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the City of Aspen Parks Department for a Specially Planned Area Review to build a
skateboard park and to relocate the basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B; and,
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No, 42, Series of 1993 approved the Rio
Grande Master Plan; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rio Grande Master Plan and applicable provisions
of the Municipal Code, development review for site specific projects for the Rio Grande
parcels shall be reviewed through the Specially Planned Area development review; and,
WHEREAS, the Rio Grande Master Plan identifies a half-pipe skateboard ramp
can be located on Rio Grande Park, Site B; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.440 of the Land Use Code, City Council
may approve a Specially Planned Area Review during a duly noticed public hearing after
considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a
duly noticed public hearing, comments from the general public, a recommendation from
the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral
agencies; and,
WHEREAS, the Fire Marshall, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City
Water Department, City Engineering, and the Community Development Department
reviewed the Project and recommended approval with conditions; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 18, 2000, the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a _ to _ L--.J vote, approval of a
Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to relocate the basketball
court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, with conditions contained herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the
approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and
elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows:
"'"'"
(')
il
Section 1
The Specially Planned Area Review to build a skateboard park and to relocate the
basketball court on Rio Grande Park, Site B, is approved with the following conditions:
1, All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect.
2, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre shall be maintained,
3, Currently, the fire extinguisher demonstration classes are performed on the present
basketball courts, The Parks Department shall consider a court surface that will
allow for the continuation of these demonstration classes,
4, The Applicant shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric
Department.
5, The Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated drinking fountain at the
entrance to Rio Grande Park,
6, A water spigot for the cleanout of the area should be provided, It may be possible
to use the irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow,
7, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed
rock or other style mud rack must be installed on site during construction,
8, Prior to Construction:
a, The Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit for the removal of trees on site,
b, The Applicant shall submit and the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan
for the site, Drainage shall be controlled in a way that is beneficial to use the
flood routing concept which would control the water flow from drainage
through depressions in the landscaping,
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity,
Section 3:
This Resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances,
"'"'"
I~
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of yompetent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 18th
day of April, 2000,
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
City Attorney
Robert Blaich, Chair
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
/""'\
r]
EXHIBIT A
ERB 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
26.440.050, Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA).
In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final
development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider the
following:
1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix
of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density,
height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space.
Staff Finding
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed skateboard park is compatible with and enhances the
mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density,
height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space, The proposed development would be
located in the Rio Grande Park. The skateboard park would enhance the mix of recreation
activities in and around the park, which include a large playing field, basketball court,
bike/pedestrian paths, and fly fishing in the Roaring Fork River.
A wide-range of land uses exist in the immediaty vicinity, including CIVIC, institutional,
commercial, office, recreational, retail, and light industrial uses, This development would add
to the eclectic mix of uses in and around the area,
The proposal is to build depressed concrete structures, The height, bulk and architecture are
compatible with the park and its surroundings, Landscaping will be provided to create a
"canopy effect" around the depressed structures, and open space will be maintained to the
greatest extent practicable,
A half-pipe skateboard ramp is identified as one of the activities intended for this parcel in
the Rio Grande Master Plan, Although the proposed skateboard consists ,of more structures
than a half-pipe ramp, the structures are depressed, The proposed development is consistent
with the Rio Grande Master Plan and conceptual review approval, This criterion is
addressed,
2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed
development.
Staff Finding
Adequate roads exist to service the proposed skateboard park. Access to this park feature is
provided by Rio Grande Place as well as the stairs counecting Rio Grande Place to Galena
Street. RFT A and the Galena Street Shuttle service this area,
5
,...",
r,
Currently, seasonal san-o-Iets are located in the park near the theater. This proposal includes
the provision of two more san-o-Iet enclosures for all park users, In addition, public
restrooms are located across Rio Grande Place in the parking garage and Youth Center. The
Civic Center Master Plan will designate a location for permanent restroom facilities for the
playing field, skateboard park, theater, and basketball court,
The existing drinking fountain would be relocated to a new plaza serving as the park's
entrance, An existing conduit, or electrical line, would be relocated as part of this
development. Parking impacts are not expected to be significant since the nature of
skateboarding is transportation and recreation; it is likely that skateboarders will arrive at the
park on their skateboards, by bus, or on foot. This criterion is addressed,
3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for
development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud
flow, rockfalls, avalanche dangers andflood hazards.
StaffFinding
Staff believes Site B is suitable for the development of a skateboard park. The Applicant
has stated that the soils are stable and has provided a Geo-technical report documenting
this finding, This site is not susceptible to mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers, or
flood hazards, This criterion is met,
4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning
techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental
impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the
project and the public at large.
Staff Finding
Staff believes the proposed development employs exceptional land planning techniques in
this design, Depressing the concrete structures preserves all view planes, avoids adverse
environmental impacts, and minimizes potential visual and noise impacts, The design also
preserves open space, trails, and all park amenities for users and the public at large, In
addition, the basketball court would be relocated to maximize sun exposure, and new park
amenities would be provided, 'including the skateboard park and more san-o-Iets. And, the
provision of a 35-foot buffer from the Ri,o Grande Trail exceeds the 20-foot recommendation
in the Master Plan, Further, the proposal provides structures for skateboarders of all levels,
and separates the beginners from the experts for safety and enjoyment reasons, This criterion
is met.
5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Finding
Although the AACP does not address expanding recreational opportumtJes in town, the
location of the proposed skateboard park is consistent with many AACP goals, For example,
the park is located in the center of town, making it accessible by alternative modes of
transportation such as by bus, bike, skateboard, or on foot. The plan also calls for creating
6
1""'\
("'\
mixed use developments, and this park will enhance the variety of land uses that already exist
on Rio Grande Park and in the immediate vicinity, Staff believes this criterion is addressed,
6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive
public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding
neighborhood.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive
public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood, City
Council has appropriated funds for all aspects of the project out of the Parks Department
, budget. This criterion is addressed,
7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20) percent
meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.445.040(B)(2).
Staff Finding
The slopes do not exceed 20%; this criterion is not applicable,
8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed
development.
Staff Finding
No GMQS allotments are required for this project; this criterion is not applicable,
7
,,.......,
r;
MEMORANDUM
To: Nick Lelack, Planner
From: Ben Ludlow, Project Engineer
Reference DRC Caseload Coordinator
Date: April 6, 2000
Re: Rio Grande Skateboard Park SPA Amendment
.
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Holy Cross Rezoning and PUD
application at their March 29,2000 meeting, and has compiled the following comments:
General
1, Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we believe
that the submitted site plan is accurate, that it shows all site features, and that it is feasible,
The wording must be carried forward exactly as written unless prior consent is received from
the Engineering Department. This is to alleviate problems related to approvals tied to
"issuance of building permit,"
2, R.O.W. Impacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-of-way,
the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment license
requirements,
Site Review
1, Site Drainage - Requirement - A drainage report was not submitted with the
application, The site development approvals must include the requirement meeting runoff
design standards of the Land Use Code at Sec, 26,580,020,A,6,a and a requirement that, prior
to the building permit application, a drainage mitigation plan (24"x36" size plan sheet or on
the lot grading plan) must meet the requirements of the Engineering Department Interim
Design Standards and must be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering
Department. The mitigation plan must also address the temporary sediment control and
containment plan for the construction phase, If drywells are an acceptable solution for site
drainage, a soils report must be provided with a percolation test to verify the feasibility of
this type of system, Drywells have depths well below depth of frost (10' minimum) to
function in cold weather. The drainage plan must contain a statement specifying the routine
maintenance required by property owner(s) to ensure continued and proper performance,
Drywells may not be placed within public right of way or utility easements, The foundation
drainage system should be separate from storm drainage, must be detained and routed on site,
and must be shown on drainage plans prior to application for building permit. The drainage
7
~
~
, ?
may be conveyed to existing landscaped areas if the drainage report demonstrates that the
percolation rate and the detention volume meet the design storm,
Information - The City drainage criteria needs to be implemented, This
includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabilization, and vegetation disturbance,
Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the drainage will flow and what adverse affects '
may arise from potential mud and debris flow,
2, Community Development - Information - The following request was provided
by the Planning Department:
a, Real bathrooms instead of san-o-Iets would highly be desired.
b, If no bathroom facilities are placed, then preparing for future bathrooms will be
beneficial.
c, Recreation classes for skateboard instruction would be beneficial.
3, Fire Protection District - Information - The following information has been
provided by the Aspen Fire Protection District:
a, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre needs to be maintained,
b, Currently the fire extinguisher demo is performed on the present basketball courts,
This needs to be taken in consideration while designing the surface for a new
court,
4, Streets Department - Requirement - As of the request of the Streets Department
revisions need to be made as follows:
a, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed
rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction,
5, Parks - Requirement - The following information has been provided by the
Parks Department:
a, A tree removal permit will be required,
6, Engineering - Information - The following requirements have been provided by
the Engineering Department:
a, There will be a lot of drainage that needs to be controlled, Therefore it would
be beneficial to use the flood routing concept which would control the water
flow from drainage through depressions in the landscaping,
7, Utilities:
Water:
8
(""';,
City Water Department - Information - The following information was given by
the City of Aspen Water Department:
a. Water facilities to the drinking fountain will have to be installed,
b, A water spigot for the cleanout of the area would be desirable and would
need to have lines properly installed, It may be possible to use the
irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow, '
c. Lines should be placed for future plans of building bathrooms,
Wastewater:
Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Information - As a request of the
Consolidated Waste District, revisions need to be made as follows: .
a, A set of drainage plans needs to be provided to Peg at ACSD so that an
estimate of fees can be processed,
Electric:
City of Aspen Electric Department - Information - As a request of the Electric
department, the following items should be noted:
a, There is a conduit that would have to be moved before digging of the
deeper bowl areas,
b, Other conduit needs to be installed now for future expansion,
Construction:
Work in the Public Right of Way - Requirement - Given the continuous problems
of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private
property, we advise the applicant as follows:
Approvals
I. Engineering:
The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering Department
(920-5080) for design of improvements, including grading, drainage,
transportation/streets, landscaping, and encroachments within public
right of way,
2, Parks:
The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920-
5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance,
3, Streets:
The applicant receives approval from the Streets department (920-
5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on streets,
and alleyways,
9
~,
A
4, Permits:
Obtain R.O,W, permits for any work or development, involving street
cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department.
DRC Attendees
Staff: Mark O'Meara
Ed Van Walraven
Ben Ludlow
Nick Adeh
John Krueger
Joyce Ohlson
Tom Bracewell
Nick Lelack
Scott Chism
Julie Ann Woods
Tom Bracewell
Applicant's Representative:
Parks Dept.
'~
10
r
. ,~
Part 400 ;.. Development Review Sta,.~_,ds and Procedures
Section 26.440.+009+0
()
/
':tfi' 1Q'1'j'l{ 01'')_
1-
Chapter 26,440
SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA (SPA)
Sections:
26,440.010
26.440.020
26,440.030
26.440,040
26,440,050
26,440,060
26.440,070
26,440,080
Purpose,
Applicability.
Designation of Specially Pla"ned Area (SPA),
Procedures for review.
Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area,
Application,
SPA agreement and recordation.
Amendment to development order.
26,440.010 Purpose.
The purpose ofa Specially Planned Area (SPA) is to:
A, Provide design flexibility for land which requires innovative consideration in those circumstances where
traditional zoning techniques do not adequately address its historic significance, natural features, unique physical
character, or location, and where potential exists for community benefit from comprehensive development.
B, Allow the development of mixed land uses through the encouragement of innovative design practices which
permit variations from standard zone district land uses and dimensional requirements,
C, Establish a procedure by which land upon which multiple uses exist, or are considered appropriate, can be
planned and redeveloped in a way that provides for lbe greatest public benefit.
26,440,020 Applicability,
Before any development shall occur on land designated Specially Planned Area (SPA) on lbe official zone
district map, or before development can occur as a Specially Planned Area (SPA), it shall comply with the requirements
oflbis Chapter.
26.440.030 Designation of Specially Planned Area (SPA),
A, Standards for designation, Any land in the City may be designated Specially Planned Area (SPA) by the City
Council if, because of its unique historic, natural, physical, or locational characteristics, it would be of great public benefit
to the City for that land to be allowed design flexibility and to be planned and developed comprehensively as a multiple
use development. A parcel ofland designated Specially Planned Area (SPA) shall also be designated on the City's official
zone district map wilb the underlying zone district designation which is determined lbe most appropriate, The underlying
zone district designation shall be used as a guide, but not an absolute limitation, to the uses and development which may
be considered during the development review process,
B, Procedure for designation. amendment. rescinding, Any parcel lbat meets the standards established in Section
26.440,030(A) may be designated Specially Planned Area (SPA) pursuant to review and recommendation by lbe Planning
and Zoning Commission and approval by the City Council pursuant to the procedures established in this Chapter, The
boundaries of a parcel previously designated Specially Planned Area (SPA) may be amended following the same
procedures used in designating a parcel Specially Planned Area (SPA), The removal of a Specially Planned Area (SPA)
designation from a parcel shall follow lbe same procedures used in designating the parcel Specially Planned Area (SPA),
but shall require demonstration of why lbe land no longer meets the standards established in Section 26.440,030(A),
".
~
(J
19' 101'%910
Part 400 - Development Revie., _,andards and Procedures
26.440.040 Procedures for Review,
A, GeneraL Any development Within a Specially Planned Area (SPA) shall be reviewed pursuant to
the procedures and standards in this Chapter and the Common Development Review Procedures set forth at
Chapter 26.304, Unless the Community Development Director determines that the application should
consolidate conceptual and final review in accordance with subsection B, below, the procedure requires
review and approval of a conceptual development plan and fmal development plan by the Planning and
Zoning Commission and City Council. A development application for Specially Planned Area (SPA)
designation shall be received and considered concurrently with a development application for a conceptual
development plan,
B, Consolidated review,
1, Conceptual and final development plan, Au applicant may request and the Community
Development Director may determiue that because of the limited extent of the issues involved in a
proposed Specially Planned Area in relation to these review procedures and standards, or because
of a significant community interest which the project would serve, it is appropriate to consolidate
conceptual and final development plan' review, The Community Development Director shall
consider whether the full four step review would be redundant and serve no public purpose and
inform the applicant during the pre-application stage whether consolidation will be permitted, An
application which is determined to be eligible for consolidation shall be processed pursuant to the
terms and procedures of final development plan review, The Planning and Zoning Commission or
the City Council may, during review, determine that the application should be subject to both
conceptual and final plan review, in which case consolidated review shall not OCcur,
2, Other development review applications, An applicant may request and the
Community Development Director may determine that an application for development within a
Specially Planned Area (SPA) may be consolidated at the third step with a development
application for conditional use, special review, ESA review, subdivision review, text amendment,
rezoning, and/or for certain GMQS exemptions, However, if the applicant requests consideration
of a code text amendment or rezoning, these applications may be considered at the conceprual
steps, subject to final review at steps three and four,
C, Steps Required: Unless consolidated in accordance with subsection B above, four steps are
required for the review and approval of an application for development within a Specially Planned Area
(SPA):
1, Step One - Hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission,
a, Purpose: To determine if application meets standards for SPA,
b, Notice requirements: None,
c, Standards of review: Section 26.440,030(A) for SPA designation, Section
26.440,050 for review of development within SPA,
d, P&Z action: Resolution approving, approving with conditions, or
disapproving conceptual development plan for SPA,
2, Step Two - Public Hearing before City Council
a. Purpose: To review recommendations of Planning and Zoning Commission and
to determine if the application meets the standards for conceptual review of an SPA,
'!.~,#
1"""'\
Part 400 - Development Revie, lndards and Procedures
()
7
2~' 1915's oio
b, Notice requirements: Requisite notice requirements for adoption of a resolution
by City Council and publication, posting and mailing, (See 26,304,060(E)(3)(a),(b), and
(c),)
c, Standards of review: Section 26.440,030(A) for SPA designation, Section
26.440,050 for review of development within SPA,
d, City Council action: Resolution approving, approving with conditions,
or disapproving conceptual plan for SPA,
3, Step Three - Public Hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission,
a, Purpose: To review application for final development plan to determine if it
meets the standards for an SPA,
b, Notice requirements:
26,304,060(E)(3)(a),(b), and (c),)
Publication,
posting
and
mailing.
(See
c, Standards of review: Section 26.440,030(A) for SPA designation, Section
26.440,050 for review of development within SPA,
d, P&Z actio>>: Resolution recommending to the City Council approval,
approval with conditions, or disapproval of the SPA,
4, Step Four - Public Hearing before the City Council.
a, Purpose: To review recommendations by Planning and Zoning Commission and
to determine if application for final development plan meets the standards for an SPA,
b. Notice requirements: Requisite notice requirements for adoption of an ordinance
by City Council and publication, posting and mailing, (See 26,304,060(E)(3)(a),(b), and
(c),)
c, Standards of review: Section 26.440,030(A) for SPA designation, Section
26.440,050 for review of development within SPA,
d, City Council:
disapproving the SPA,
Ordinance approving, approving with conditions, or
D, Limitations, A development application for a final development plan shall be submitted within
two (2) years of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan, Unless an extension is granted by
the City Council prior to expiration, failure to file such an application within this time period shall render
null and void the approval of a conceptual development plan, Approval of a conceptual development plan
shall not constitute final approval for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA), or permission to
proceed with development. Such approval shall only constitute authorization to proceed with a
development application for a final development plan,
26.440.050,
Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA),
A, General, In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a
final development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider the
following:
1. Whether th'e proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of
development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk,
architecture, landscaping and open space,
'"'"-,,,,-,
~
~
"
Part 400 - Development Revie" ....tandards and Procedures
"? 1AA?<i Q1Q
2, Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development.
3, Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development,
considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche
dangers and flood hazards,
4, Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to
preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space,
trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large,
5, Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan,
6, Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds
to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood,
7, Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20) percent meet the slope
reduction and density requirements of Section 26.445,040(B)(2),
8, Whether there are sufficient GMQS allot~ents for the proposed development.
The burden shall rest upon an applicant to demonstrate the general reasonableness and
suitability of the proposed development, and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this
Chapter and Section; provided, however, that in the review of the conceptual development plan,
consideration will be given only to the general concept for the development, while during the
review of the final development plan, detailed evaluation of the specific aspects of the
development will be accomplished,
B, Variations permitted, The final development plan shall comply with the requirements of the
underlying zone district; provided, however, that variations from those requirements may be allowed based
on the standards of this Section, Variations may be allowed for the following requirements: open space,
minimum distance between buildings, maximum height, minimum front yard, minimum rear yard,
minimum side yard, minimum lot width, minimum lot area, trash' access area, internal floor area ratio,
number of off-street parking spaces and uses, and design standards of Chapter 26.410 for streets and related
improvements, Any variations allowed shall be specified in the SPA agreement and shown on the final
development plan,
26,440,060 Application.
A, Conceptual development plan,
1. Contents of application, The contents of the development application for a conceptual
development plan shall include the following:
a, The general application information required in Common Development' Review
Procedures set forth at Chapter 26,304,030,
b, A conceptual description of the proposed development. This shall include but
not be limited to a statement of the intent of the proposed development and a conceptual
description of proposed land uses, densities, design concepts, access ways, and a general
time schedule for construction of the proposed development.
c, A statement outlining in conceptual terms how the proposed development will
be served with the appropriate public facilities and how assurances will be made that
those public facilities are available to serve the proposed development.
d, A conceptual site plan, illustrating:
ri
""-./"
J
,~
Part 400 Development Revie" -,..andards and Procedures
~
'''i 1915~ /JIg
(1) Existing natural and manmade features,
(2) General configuration of proposed land uses, access ways, and existing
and proposed utilities,
(3) Schematic drawings of proposed buildings, indicating general site
design features and overall mass ,and height of proposed structures,
B. Final development plan,
1, Contents of application The contents of a development application for a final
development plan shall include the following:
a, The general application information required in Chapter 26.304,
b, A precise plan of the proposed development including but not limited to
proposed land uses, densitles, landscaping, internal traffic circulation, and accessways,
The precise plan shall be in sufficient detail to enable evaluation of the architectural,
landscaping, and design features of the proposed development. It shall show the location
and floor area of all existing and proposed buildings and other improvements including
heights, dwelling unit types and nonresidential facilities,
c, A statement specifying the underlying zone district on the parcel and, if
variations are proposed, a statement of how the variations comply with the standards of
Section 26.440,040(B),
d, A statement outlining a development schedule specifying the date construction
is proposed to be initiated and completed,
e, A statement specifying the public facilities that will be needed to accommodate
the proposed development, and what specific assurances will be made to ensure that
public facilities will be available to accommodate the proposed development,
f, A statement of the reasonable conformance of the final development plan with
the approval granted to the conceptual development plan and with the original intent of
the City Council in designating the parcel Specially Planned Area (SPA),
g, A plat which depicts the applicable information required by Section
26.480,060(A)(3),
h, A proposed SPA agreement which conforms to Section 26.440,070 below,
26,440,070 SPA agreement and Recordation,
A, SPA Agreement, Upon approval of a final development plan, the applicant and the City Council
shall enter into an agreement binding the real property to any conditions placed on the development order
approving the final development plan, and providing landscape and public facilities guarantees as specified
in Section 26.480,070,
B, Recordation of final development plan, The final development plan, which shall consist, as
applicable, of final drawings depicting the site plan, landscape plan, utility plan and building elevations,
and specially planned area (SPA) agreement shall be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder, and shall be binding upon the property owners subject to the development order, their successors
and assigns, and shall constitute the development regulations for the property, Development of the property
shall be limited to the uses, density, configuration, and all other elements and conditions set forth on the
...1-.
1"""\
Part 400 - Development Revie,. .Jcandards and Procedures
:'j
19 4Q4;, 919
final development plan and SPA agreement. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the final
development plan and SPA agreement within a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days following its
approval by City Council shall render the plan invalid and all associated vested rights shall expire,
Reconsideration of the final development plan and SPA agreement by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or City Council may be required before its acceptance and recording,
C, Recordation of designation. Upon the effective date of an act by the City Council designating a
Specially Planned Area (SPA), the Community Development Director shall notifY the City Clerk of the
designation, The Clerk shall record among the real estate records, of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin
County, Colorado, a certified copy of the ordinance, The ordinance shall include a legal description of the
property which is being designated Specially Planned Area (SPA),
D, Placement on City's official zone distric~ l1lap. Upon the effective date of an act by the City
Council designating a Specially Planned Area (SPA), the Community Development Director shall place the
SPA designation and underlying zone district designation on the City's official zone district map,
26.440.090 Amendment to development order,
A, An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may
be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an
insubstantial amendment:
1. A change in the use or character of the development.
2, An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the
land,
3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed
development, or the demand for public facilities,
4, A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space,
5, A reduction by greater than one (I) percent of the off-street parking and loading space,
6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements.
7, An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of
commercial buildings,
8, An increase by greater than one (I) percent in the approved residential density of the
development.
9, Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original
approval or which requires granting of a further variation from the project's approved use or
dimensional requirements.
B, All other modifications shall be approved pursuant to the terms and procedures
of the final development plan, provided that the proposed change is consistent with or
an enhancement of the approved final plan, If the proposed change is not consistent
with the approved final development plan, the amendment shall be subject to both
conceptual and the final development review and approval.
C, During the review of them proposed amendment, the planning and zoning Commission and City
Council may require such conditions of approval as are necessary to insure that the development will be
compatible with current community conditions, This shall include, but not be limited to, applying to the
c
"~j "'_ ",f
~
Part 400 Development Revie" .>[imdards and "Procedures
~\
;;
"(i 19157 QIIJ
portions of the development which have not obtained building permits or are proposed to be amended to
any new community policies or regulations which have been implemented since the original approval, or
taking into consideration changing community circumstances as they affect the project's original
representations and commitment"s. The applicant may withdraw the proposed amendment at any time
during the review process.
Il!l~,... '" .
r)
Part 400 Development Revie" ...ffindards and Procedures
,,,,,",,,,
,:: .:9
2<<: 1Q"'% QIQ
'""<'"
f'"
(1
MEMORANDUM
To: Nick Lelack, Planner
From: Ben Ludlow, Project Engineer < /~ ~
Reference DRC Case load Coordinator'
Date: April 6, 2000
Re: Rio Grande Skateboard Park SPA Amendment
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Holy Cross Rezoning and PUD
application at their March 29, 2000 meeting, and has compiled the following comments:
General
1, Sufficiency of Submittal: DRC comments are based on the fact that we believe
that the submitted site plan is accurate, that it shows all site features, and that it is
feasible, The wording must be carried forward exactly as written unless prior consent is
received from the Engineering Department. This is to alleviate problems related to
approvals tied to "issuance of building permit."
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
2, R.O.W.lmpacts: If there are any encroachments into the public rights-of-way,
the encroachment must either be removed or be subject to current encroachment
license requirements,
Site Review
1, Site Drainage - Requirement - A drainage report was not submitted with the
application, The site development approvals must include the requirement meeting
runoff design standards of the Land Use Code at Sec, 26,580,020,A,6,a and a
requirement that, prior to the building permit application, a drainage mitigation plan
(24"x36" size plan sheet or on the lot grading plan) must meet the requirements of the
Engineering Department Interim Design Standards and must be submitted for review
and approval by the Engineering Department. The mitigation plan must also address the
temporary sediment control and containment plan for the construction phase, If drywells
are an acceptable solution for site drainage, a soils report must be provided with a
percolation test to verify the feasibility of this type of system, Drywells have depths well
below depth of frost (10' minimum) to function in cold weather, The drainage plan must
contain a statement specifying the routine maintenance required by property owner(s) to
ensure continued and proper performance, Drywells may not be placed within public
right of way or utility easements, The foundation drainage system should be separate
from storm drainage, must be detained and routed on site, and must be shown on
drainage plans prior to application for building permit. The drainage may be conveyed to
existing landscaped areas if the drainage report demonstrates that the percolation rate
and the detention volume meet the design storm,
.~"
~
(")
Page 2 of 4
04/07/00
Rio Grande Skateboard Park SPAAmendment,
Information - The City drainagecrite;'ria needs to be implemented, This
includes but is not limited to erosion control, soil stabilization, and vegetation
disturbance, Also, there needs to be an analysis of where the drainage will flow and
what adverse affects may arise from potential mud and debris flow,
2, Community Development - Information - The following request was provided
by the Planning Department:
a, Real bathrooms instead ofsan:o-Iets 'Noyld highly be desired,
b, If no bathroom facilities are placed, then preparing for future bathrooms will
be beneficial. '
c, Recreation classes for skateboard instruction would be beneficial.
3, Fire Protection District - Information - The following information has been
provided by the Aspen Fire Protection District:
a, Emergency vehicle access to the theatre needs ,to bE! maintained,
b, Currently the fire extinguisher demo is performed on the present basketball
courts, This needs to be taken in consideration while designing the surface
for a new court,
4, Streets Department - Requirement - As of the request of the Streets
Department revisions need to be made as follows:,
a, The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction: A
washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction,
5, Parks - Requirement- The following information has been provided by the
Parks Department:
a, A tree removal permit will be required,
6, Engineering - Information.,. The following requirements have been provided by
the Engineering Department:
a, There will be a lot of drainage that needs to be controlled, Therefore it
would be beneficial to use the flood routing concept which would control
the water flow from drainage through depressions in the landscaping,
7, Utilities:
Water:
City Water Department - Information - The following information was given by
the City of Aspen Water Department:
a, Water facilities to the drinking fountain will have to be installed,
~'
~
01
,
Page 3 of4
04/07/00
Rio Grande Skateboard Park SPA Amendment
b, A water spigot for the c1eanout of the area woul,d be .desirat:>le. and
would need to have lines, properly installed, It may be possible to use
the irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow,
c, Lines should be placed no for future plans of building bathrooms,
Wastewater:
Aspen Consolidated Waste District - Information - As a request of the
Consolidated Waste District, revisions need to be made as follows:
a, A set of drainage plans needs to be provided to Peg at ACSD so that
an estimate of fees can be processed,
Electric:
City of Aspen Electric Department - Information - As a request of the Electric
department, the following items should be noted:
a, There is a conduit that would have to be moved before digging of the
deeper bowl areas,
b, Other conduit needs to be installed now for future expansion,
Construction:
Work in the Public Right of Way - Requirement - Given the continuous
problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent
to private property, we advise the applicant as follows:
Approvals
1, Engineering:
The applicant receives approval from the City Engineering
Department (920-5080) for design of improvements, including
grading, drainage, transportation/streets, landscaping, and
encroachments within public right of way,
2, Parks:
The applicant receives approval from the Parks Department (920-
5120) for vegetation species and for public trail disturbance,
4, Permits:
The applicant receives approval from the Streets department
(920-5130) for mailboxes, finished pavement, surface materials on
streets, and alleyways,
Obtain R.OW, permits for any work or development, involving
street cuts and landscaping from the Engineering Department.
3, Streets:
~,t ".
1""""'\,
Page 4 of 4
04/07/00
Rio Grande Skateboard Park SPA Amendment
DRC Attendees
Staff: Mark O'Meara
Ed Van Walraven
Ben Ludlow
Nick Adeh
John Krueger
Joyce Ohlson
Tom Bracewell
Nick Lelack
Scott Chism
Julie Ann Woods
Tom Bracewell
Applicant's Representative:
r-'\
,iI
Parks Dept.
'~..~ ,_,"", _ ,"~. ,.'",_';~'_~'''n'~''
-.' -'~r.:' .'" '
<' ~",~';'"f;''' ' 'e,;;' "',
. __:'<-';"_"<:<'<_Y~'" ",,''-'f''?'''''...:'''!''' ::,."" ." .
.0--'''''
"-'---'. "'':^''',''''''''''''r ,f ~""-~3"'~'''/:;';'':~ii;'''1<':h;~,%,!ii~~i};i:f ".', .:. ":,' .",' ,,'
l.
" "
, ' - .
Aspen Ar~IL{;!tmp;1Jllll~Y Plan
~
I
I
Work Program Priorities
",-,:"""."",~" ., -"....,., --~.,,,,,,,,,_.,,-,,,,--,,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,,,. . -" ,
." ", " _Wl,,,,,,",>"-"""'i~""_"*_'.~';"'~,,".'~i;"",,,',",;,,,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,
2000 to 2005 '
, ' . '::., '-.,""'",' "'''':':''''':'''''''~~~~~'~'''''-''&.'''''''_:~4~~''''~'_",''~'''''''_''"''''';'',~..,..-'l-i!'';''Y'''',,*M"""".~""""
Febmary 28, 2000
;-.."
Ii
,
-,
AACP Action Plan Items
Work Program
1. Aspen Community Growth Boundary & Intergovernmental Agreement
Develop an Aspen Community Growth Boundary and intergovernmental agreement between the City of
Aspen and Pitkin County addressing a joint review process for the area within the Community Growth
Boundary, but outside of the City Limits; annexation policies and policies regarding the development
outside of the boundary,
Complies with "Action Item #1", Growth Section Action Items #22-31 ,and Housing Item #7-17
Lead Department: Community Development
Status: This is part of developing the Future Land Use Map and plan
2. Study needed modifications to Gr,owth Ml1p.agement Quota System (GMQS):
. Study amendments to the Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) or develop a replacement
system to allow more flexibility in meeting our. affordable housing goals, (HS)
. Identify the remaining development potential for free market residential, affordable housing, lodges,
commercial space, etc, Consider modifying the GMQ system to have a separate allocation for
affordable mitigation units versus unassociated affordable units, Update the maximum ceiling
numbers in the Pitkin County Land Use Code (GMQS) annually for each type of development.
Identify the implications of exceeding these caps if we have a goal of limiting the population to 1998
levels, (G4)
. Explore ways to address the need to capture what is currently explicitly exempted or missed from the
Growth Management Quota System, Prior to making changes, evaluate the possible unintended
consequences of changes to the GMQ system, (GI6)
. ,Consider revisions to the Growth Management Quota System: reduce or eliminatemulti~year
allotments, study the creation of a new system or method that paces development (building permit
quota or lottery system), eliminate exemptions, etc, (G21, 22, H6)
. Consider changes to land use codes that would encourage the development of upper floors in the
downtown core to be developed for housing, including giving a higher priority to on-site housing in
the commercial core in the GMQ system or its replacement, (G3S)
. Study the impacts ofreducing or eliminating multi-year allocations in the GMQS, (G47)
. Study methods and usefulness of discouraging "cash-in-lieu payments" as Affordable Housing
mitigation for development. It is preferred that the developer build new units, ADU's or buy down
existing units, and that they do so concurrently or prior to the construction of the new development.
Whenever cash-in-lieu is approved as a method of mitigation, the payment should be commensurate
with the cost to purchase land and build an actual dwelling unit or buy down an existing unit.
. Conduct a study of the real costs of residential development to the community, Figures being
generated should ultimately tie the actual employee generation to (a) the expense of construction by
square footage, and/or (b) the size of the home, This study would include both free-market and
affordable housing in the tabulations,
Page 1
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
,.---.,
,/-,
,
· Study the impacts of revising the "change in use" provision of the City and County Codes, Consider
requiring mitigation of any change in use that produces a net increase in impacts, and that the level of
mitigation required be equal to 100% of the increase in impacts generated by the change in use,
· Consider growth management polices that will encourage development ,as close to the town center as
possible, or in identified Transit Oriented Development sites,
Complies with Housing Section Action Item #5,6,7; Growth Items #4,14,16,21,22,35,40,47
Lead Department: Community Development
Status: Remaining development potential based on existing GMQS has been identified, Several
modifications are being considered to the GMQ system, Discussions are underway with a consultant to
draft a white paper on the subject. The issue of real costs of residential development is addressed, to
some extent, in a report by Gabe Preston, Pitkin County Planner,
3. FAR Study
Explore a significant decrease in the FAR allowed both in the city and county, Study appropriateness of
current FAR allowances and how FAR is measured, including a study of volume, for both affordable and
free market developments,
Complies with Housing Section Action Items # 17; Growth 19
Lead Department: Community Development .
Status:
4. Annexation Plan
Update the Alli1exation Plan between Aspen and Pitkin County, taking into consideration the proposed
Aspen Community Growth Boundary, Update alli1exation plans between Pitkin County and Snowmass
Village, as well as other jurisdictions, to reflect our desire to guide new development near existing
population centers and within three mile boundaries,
Complies with Growth Section Action Items #50, 54,
Lead Department: Community Development
Status: Updating the AspenlPitkin Annexation Plan will be a follow-up activity to the Future Land Use Map
and is in the work program for 2000
5. Infill and Redevelopment
· Consider amendments to City development regulations to allow and encourage greater densities
within the original Aspen town site, Allow easier subdivision of properties in the historic town site
and allow for infill development, especially affordable housing, For example, infill development
should be promoted above businesses in the downtown core,
· Study what areas in downtown could have increased housing density in the form of mixed-use
buildings,
· Study the feasibility of creating minimum zoning density which promotes the goals of the AACP,
Complies with Action Items: Historic Preservation 1, Housing # 10, 11, 12
Lead Department: Community Development & Housing Authority
Status: Finished and ready for work session
Page 2
AACP Action Plan
03102100
/'''''\
A
-,
6. Transferred Development Rights Study
. Continue to work on moving Transferred Development Rights from the rural areas to the Metro area.
Study the feasibility and impacts of Purchase of Development Rights,
. Study the implications of naming the Commercial COre as a Transfer Development Right (TDR)
receiving site,
. Study implementation Purchase Development Rights programs
. Study the feasibility of using TDR's to sterilize development on lands identified as "private lands
with conservation ,value " on ~he Open Space map.
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #51, Economic Sustain ability # 13, Housing Section # 14
Lead Department: Community Development '
Status: Staff work has been initiated to identify issues related to a City of Aspen TOR program, The County
has begun a study of PDR's,
7. Encouraging Affordable Housing ProvisionlDevelopment
Study criteria for upzoning for higher density affordable housing,
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #37
Lead Department: Community Development
Status: To some extent this is being addressed through the Infill Housing study that is going on, but that
work could be expanded to address broader Metro Area opportunities,
8. Encouraging Affordable Housing ProvisionlDevelopment
. Develop a simplified set of Housing Development Guidelines, A straightforward set of requirements
adopted (not more often than once a year) that would delineate the acceptable places, density, types of
units, price restrictions, etc, The document could explain the purpose of the housing program and even
encourage specific types of development desired by the community and any public monies available
in partnerships, This would not supersede the requirements for subdivision, PUD, etc" but would give
some indication as to the category mix, types of units, etc" that are acceptable to elected officials,
Developers complying with the guide may be able to proceed through the approval process more
simply, The intent would be to focus the philosophical debate of what is acceptable to one time per
year and not in response to each development application, (G 45) ,
. Maintain a clear set of affordable housing development guidelines that delineate the specific
objectives of our housing policy, These guidelines should not be re-evaluated with each individual
development proposal, but should be amended on a regular basis as our housing circumstances and
needs change, Because people may rely on these guidelines in purchasing land, these guidelines
should not change so often as to cause significant uncertainties, (H 27)
. Investigate incentives for and consider adding to the existing criteria for lot splits the ability to
subdivide for Affordable Housing,
. Study opportunities to provide incentives in our development regulations and housing policies in order
to encourage the development of affordable housing by community groups such :,\S citizens,
businesses, and non-profits,
. Study opportunities to amend development regulations to facilitate the development of affordable
housing units,
. Consider modifications to development review procedures to give priority to projects that promote a
"mix" of housing types to serve people of different needs and income levels, and encourage a healthy
social balance,
. Simplify and shorten review procedures for projects clearly meeting the objectives of our housing
policy and the overall community goals, These guidelines should not be reevaluated on a per project
basis, but should rather be amended on a regular basis as our housing circumstances change,
Page 3
AACl' Action Plall
03/02/00
,---"
,,,............\
· Evaluate parking standards for affordable housing and infill development that can be tied into design
and management alternatives,
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #38, 45, Housing Section Action Items # 3, 20, 21, 24, 27, 28
Lead Department: Community Development and Housing Authority
Status: The role of the Interim Citizens Housing Plan and Guidelines should be made more clear, This is
supportive of the Housing Master Plan effort,
9. Infill and Redevelopment: Site Specific Study
Evaluate opportunities for publicly held properties to be developed or redeveloped to include or be
replaced by affordable housing, Explore moving the Aspen Fire Station to Main Street and developing
neighborhood commercial shops with affordable housing above, Utilize the current site to develop a
model of mixed-use neighborhood commercial, offices and housing,
Complies with Housing Section Action Items # 9 & 15
Lead Department: Community Development & Housing Authority
Status:
10. Better Data Collection:
Evaluate existing conditions and determine actual population levels today for the Aspen metro area based
on updated lodge room and household numbers, Every five years conduct an updated current population
analysis, both of permanent residents and part-time residents and visitors, Bring the 1993 AACP Existing
Conditions report up to date, (GI, 39, 46, H2)
Create a tracking system that would allow the Community Development Department to more easily report
all approved development that is not yet built. (G41)
Submit a report to City Council at the end of each year. The Construction Report may work for this
purpose, This report shows all of the year's building permits based on type and valuation, (G42)
Develop a procedure for analyzing build out potential annually, The Construction Report may serve as a
base, (G43)
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #1,39,41,42,43,46, Housing Item #2,
Lead Department: Community Development
Status: The AACP Existing Conditions Report fulfills this obligation, Annual maintenance of this report is
now part ofthe long range planner duties, This is consistent with the planned maintenance of the Existing
Conditions Report
11. Downtown Enhanced Pedestrian Plan (DEPP)
Following the completion of the DowTItown Enhanced Pedestrian Plan (DEPP) Pilot Project, work with
area business owners to complete the full implementation of the project.
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 12
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
12. Rural Transportation Authority
Support the Rural Transportation Authority (RTA) Action Plan by helping to bring the RTA concept to
voters in the Roaring Fork Valley by May 2000, with a funding vote in November 2000,
Complies with T17
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Underway
13. Entrance to Aspen
Obtain funding for and implement the Entrance to Aspen Record of Decision,
Complies With T2
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Underway
Page 4
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
r"'\
,~
, 'J
14. Sustainable Ec()n()mic nev~l()pment Task Force
Establish a susta,inable econoIIlic dey(:lopment task force to identify effective ways to increase wealth
generation within the existing economic structure, Its meIIlbershipshould include the entire valley,
Complies with Economic Sustainability # 6
Lead Department:
Status:
15. Work to Preserve Open Space
Study opportunities to preserve parcels or portions of parcels identified in the "Greenfrastructure
Plan" to be undertaken by the Parks Department for future parks and open space. Acquire
properties along river corridors, including the Roaring Fork River, and Maroon and Castle Creeks.
Where needed, acquire properties to establish and enhance "greenfrastructure" and pedestrian
access, including acquiring easements along river corridors.
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #8 & 14
Lead Department: Parks Department
Status:
16. Ecological Bill of Rights
Revisit the Ecological Bill of Rights. Develop a specific action plan for each "Right" to reflect the
Bill of Rights.
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #19
Lead Department: Environmental Health
Status: Planned for 2001
17. Housing Master Plan
. A Housing Master Plan which pulls together all of the relevant documents related to Affordable
Housing should be compiled, It should highlight and be consistent with the criteria outlined in the
Interim Citizen Housing Plan and the goals and policies ofthe Housing element of the AACP, (G 5)
. The City and County should utilize the Interim Strategic Housing Guidelines for determining
appropriate affordable housing sites, The criteria should represent both the physical characteristics of
the land and, its ability to contribute to the social fabric of town, A map should be developed showing
areas that might meet those criteria, (H 7, 18)
. Modify development regulations to support the Interim Strategic Housing Guidelines and encourage
development of affordable housing where many of the "good housing site criteria" are represented,
(H8)
Complies with Housing Section Action Items # 7, 8, 18, Growth #5
Lead Department: Community Development and Housing Authority
Status: Related to Future Land Use Map, Also falis into the work program development of the Housing
Authority, Criteria already exist in the form of the "Interim Strategic Housing Guidelines,"
18. Community Sustainability Indicators
Develop indicators of community sustainability in order to measure important areas in which the valley
community may be progressing or declining over time, They should include indicators of community,
environmental and economic well-being, Track business ownership to determine extent of local
ownership, Track the number of Full Time Equivalent (FTE) employees in each business, and any other
indicators deemed useful in determining community economic health,
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 1, 2, 3
Lead Department: Community Development and Finance Department
Status:
Page 5
AACP ACtion Plan
03/02/00
~
/...--\
19. Neighborhood Commercial and Service/ Commercial! Industrial Zone Districts
Revise the Neighborhood Commercial and Service/ Commercial/ Industrial zone district permitted and
conditional uses lists to ensure only locally serving uses are permitted within those zone districts,
Eliminate the option for single family housing in those zone districts,
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 8
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
20. Stem the Loss of Commercial and Office Space
Review city and county codes to identify and resolve problems regarding the loss of commercial and
office space to other uses, To simplify the code, reduce the overall number of zone districts and eliminate
redundancies,
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 17
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
21. Add Neighborhood Commercial and Service/ Commercial/ Industrial Zoned Areas
Zone additional areas for Neighborhood Commercial and Service/ Commercial! Industrial development
within the city, Study the impacts of rezoning undeveloped commercially zoned land to neighborhood
commercial or SCI zoning with an affordable housing overlay requiring affordable housing be built on
site, Promote mixed-use development, especially in the Commercial Core,
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 9, 10
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
22. Historic Preservation Land Use Code Amendments
Review and amend the land use code to address the following issues related to Historic Preservation:
· Study and amend land use/zoning regulations so that hindrances to creating traditional building forms
and context are removed (for example 25% open space req,), (HP 2)
.' Re-examine the land use code so that Main Street and the dO\^iutown core can be redeveloped to
provide possible locations for, and encourage the creation of, small businesses and mixed uses, (HP 3)
Complies with Action Items: Historic Preservation #2 & 3
Lead Department: Community Development; Historic Preservation
Status:
23. Study Tiered Development Approval
Study the feasibility and usefulness of developing a tiered development approval process that correlates
the number of steps to the number of units requested (a greater number of steps for larger projects),
Develop a separate process for conversion to Affordable Housing from free-market residential or lodge
units as well as for upgrades of existing Affordable Housing units,
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #6
Lead Departments: Community Development and Housing Authority
Status:
24. Re-Development Mitigation
Explore having larger redevelopment projects pay for either on-site, deed-restricted Accessory Units or a
buy-down elsewhere within the Aspen Community Growth Boundary,
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #18
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
Page 6
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
,,....,
~
25. Improve and Broaden Residential Design Standards
Improve and strengthen residential design standards,includiIlg adding landscape review and studying
design standards for properties adjacent to historic properties,
Complies with Action Items: Historic Preservation # 11-15
Lead Department: Community Development; Historic Preservation
Status: New design standards have been adopted, Landscape review is being discussed,
26. Improve Enforcement ofHPC Decisions
Develop stronger methods of enforcement with HPC direction such as larger fines, withholding
Certificates of Occupancy (CO's), licensing contractors for historic work, etc,
Complies with Action Items: Historic Preservation #16-19
Lead Department: Community Development & Attorney's Office
Status:
27. Protect Historic Sites
Protect historic sites, update the inventory, createa preservation watch list to monitor demolitions of non-
inventoried properties, etc,
Complies with Action Items: Historic Pre'servation #20-22
Lead Department: Community Development; Historic Preservation
Status:
28. Improve Historic Preservation Communication and Education
Improve communication, education, and advocacy for historic preservation and create better tools to
accomplish this goal such as brochures, speakers bureau for local groups, historic marker program, history
oflocal historic preservation efforts, etc,
Complies with Action Items: Historic Preservation #23-28
Lead Department: Community Development; Historic Preservation
Status:
29, Improve Historic Preservation Commission Review Process
Work to improve the Historic Preservation Commission review process,
Complies with Action Items: Historic Preservation # 6-10
Lead Departrnent: Community Development; Historic Preservation
Status:
30. Improve Design Quality Communication and Education
Improve communication, education, and advocacy for quality design through public education and
outreach program building, upon the recommendations in the AACP 1998 Update,
Complies with Action Items: Design Quality # 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,10, & 17
Lead Department: Community Development: Historic Preservation
Status:
31. Support Restoration of Existing Buildings
Investigate ways to encourage the restoration or improvement of existing buildings, Special attention
should be given to buildings with multiple ownership (condo's),
Complies with Action Items: Design Quality # 15
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
Page 7
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
~,
!\
32. Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle
Promote the concept of "Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle" as a way to protect our environment and extend the
life of the Pitkin County Landfill.
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #21
Lead Department: Environmental Health
Status: Step 1 of Reduce Reuse Recycle will be taken this year with testcompactor/recycling stations in
Red Onion alley and City Hall. In 2000, the Environmental Health Department will try to increase City Hall
recycling, expand to other city buildings, and study ways to increase recycling in the core, We will
investigate better recycling in city parks and backyard composting program,
33. De-Icing Alternatives
Study the impact of the use of de-icing applications on vegetation and water quality: Explore alternatives
to using chemicals or establish a policy of a dilution ratio to minimize the impacts of de-icing and dust
abatement agents such as Magnesium Chloride or other chemicals,
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #18
Lead Department: Environmental Health
Status: A study of impa:t of deicers was completed in 1999 and reported to council. An alternative to
Magnesium Chloride is now in use as a deicer,
In 2000 the Environmental Health Department will continue in-stream monitoring to see what the levels of
chemicals are and will evaluate the results of analyses of concentrations of heavy metals in air and report
that to council. Council has not wanted to use alternatives to deicers, The Streets Department is minimizing
use of deicers to get as much dilution as possible,
34. Better Data Collection:
The Housing Authority should regularly tabulate and publish a list of public sector affordable housing
projects in the planning stages,
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #44, Goal F
Lead Department: Housing Authority
Status:
35. Aspen in-town transit service
Develop and implement a plan for improving in-town transit service and reversing recent declines in in-
town ridership, The plan should consider a variety of service improvements and take into account traveler
demand and net public cost per rider. Among the service improvements that might be considered include:
. Relocating or adding bus stops where necessary,
. Providing bus stop shelters and other amenities,
. Procuring new and better vehicles,
. Running the Hunter Creek bus service in both directions,
. Establishing an East End fixed-route service,
. Extending the operating hours of the Galena Street Shuttle to serve evening and nighttime travel
destinations more effectively,
. Increasing the frequency and reliability of bus service to the Music Tent.
. Providing bus service to the Red Brick Arts Center and other places in the West End,
. Providing increased transit service to sporting, cultural and other special events,
. Provding or el1couraging the private sector to provide vanpool, dial-a-ride, or other forms of transit
service to upper Red Mountain neighborhoods,
Complies with T5
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: UndelWay
Page 8
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
~
(',
36. Transportation Management
Provide a wide range of flexible transportation management tools and techniques to reduce single-
occupant automobile use, Increase participation in the TransportationOptions Program,
Complies with T42, T43, T44, T45, T46
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
37. Parking Regulations
Study the benefits and costs of amending the city and county development regulations to require new
developments to limit parking provided on-site to levels substantially below currentrequirements, Study
the benefits and costs of requiring new parking areas to be designed for later conversion to other uses such
as affordable housing or park space, Study locations, benefits and costs for remote parking as a substitute
for on-site parking, Develop standards for providing bicycle parking, Bring proposals to Council for
approval as appropriate,
Complies with T55, T57, T56
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Not yet underway,
38. Transit-Oriented Design and Development
Develop guidelines, review criteria and development regulations to ensure that new developments in the
Roaring Fork Valley are designed for easy and cost-effective transit, pedestrian and bicycle access and
circulation, Identify appropriate locations for transit-oriented development.
Complies with T60 and T61
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Partially underway through RFT A master plan development process and Corridor Investment
Study,
39. Transportation Data
Improve the ability of elected officials, staff and citizens to understand transportation problems and the
effectiveness of solutions by collecting better data on local travel patterns, For example, establish new
and permanent traffic count locations and conduct periodic scientific surveys of travel patterns,
Complies with T62, T63
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Development of a data collection "framework" is underway,
40. GIS Inventory of Sidewalks, Trails and Bike Routes
Create a GIS-based inventory of existing and proposed bikeways, bike storage facilities, existing and
proposed sidewalks, and other walkways and trails in the Aspen metro area, The inventory can be used to
develop a brochure/ bicycle map of the Aspen area that includes information on the location of bicycle/
transit interface pOints, bike shops, bicycle parking, pavement types, etc,
Complies with T19
Lead Department: Transportation and GIS
Status: Partially completed,
41. Improve Highway Safety
Work with CDOT to improve highway safety in the Roaring Fork Valley,
Complies with T41
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Ongoing
Page 9
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
~
,,.--\
42. Preserve the Rio Grande Right of Way
Preserve the Rio Grande Railroad right-of-way as a transit and a pedestrian corridor within the City of
Aspen,
Complies with T16
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Ongoing
43. Consider Other Innovative Transportation Modes
Continue to study the idea of connecting skier facilities, residential areas, etc, via gondolas, funiculars,
aerial tramways and other non-automobile means,
Complies with T64
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Ongoing
44. Monitor Highway Construction Impacts on Vehicle Use
Monitor and study the impact of the Basalt-to-Buttermilk highway reconstruction on travel behavior,
including rates of single-occupant vehicle use and accidents,
Complies with T30
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Ongoing
45. Enforce HOV lanes
Work with law enforcement to ensure proper use ofHOV lanes on Highway 82,
Complies with T31
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Ongoing
46. Greenfrastructure Plan
Develop a Comprehensive Map and Inventory of all existing public property, trail easements, and fishing
easements including land trust properties and conservation easement holdings, If possible, the map or
maps should include areas of Aspen, Pitkin County, Snowmass Village and (to extent possible) down
valley areas, The map, preferably done on a GIS system, should be updated every 2-3 years, A
comprehensive database should be developed, keeping track of all conservation easements and open
space parcels, the beneficiaries of these, the date of purchase and intent of the acquisition, any
development stipulations, etc. T.hese should be linked to the GIS map.
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment # 3 & 14
Lead Department: Parks Department & Community Development
Status: Part of Future Land Use Map
47. Sixth Penny Ordinance
Study the impacts ofrevising the Sixth Penny Ordinance that provides funding for City Parks, Trails and
Open Space, to make it consistent with Pitkin County Open Space language, That language requires
replacement of any converted park, open space or trail interest with a comparable parcel of land,
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment # 16
Lead Department: Parks Department & Attorneys Office
Status:
Page 10
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
r-.,
~
"
48. Wagner and Iselin Parks Master Plans
Complete the MasterPlans for Wagner Park and Iselin Park. Look at ways to continue active use of the
parks in development of the plan. '
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #7
Lead Department: Parks Department '
Status: Iselin Master Plan completed, Wagner Park Master Plan to be completed by summer 2000,
49. Increase Revenues to Support Recreational Operations
Study opportunities to increase revenues to support recreational operations including increased user fees
and other sources, '
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #12
Lead Department: Parks Department
Status: Underway, Parks Department is recommending new user fees that will be reviewed annually as
part of the budget process,
50. Promote Volunteer Involvement in Parks Maintenance
Organize "Volunteer Days" for parks and open space preservation aIld maintenance projects,
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #5
Lead Department: Parks Department
Status: Underway, Volunteer projects completed inClude Marolt Wetlands, John Denver Sanctuary and
Snyder Park, Future projects inClude Maroon Creek Wetlands, and Community Campus,
51. Re-Development or Reconstruction Mitigation
Explore developing a sliding scale to apply to all substantial re-development or reconstruction (where all,
or virtually all of a commercial or residential building is tom down and rebuilt) for mitigation of
affordable housing,
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #17
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
52. Review Historic Preservation Program
Review existing Historic Preservation program to see how well it is working, Maintain and add
innovative ways to make preservation work in Aspen, such as the historic landmark lot split, property tax
relief, study impacts of FAR bonus
Complies with Action Items: Historic Preservation #29-40
Lead Department: Community Development; Historic Preservation
Status:
53. Essential Community Facility and Affordable Housing
In planning for any "Essential Community Facility," it should be determined if there is sufficient
affordable housing associated with the project to ensure the facility is viable over the long run,
Complies with Housing Section ACtion Items # 16
Lead Department:
Status:
54. Encourage Public/Private Partnerships to Provide Affordable Housing
The Housing Authority should pursue public/private partnerships with private sector developers,
businesses, and non-profits to aid in the development of affordable housing which can address the specific
party and the overall community, New partnership ideas as well as "tried and true" concepts that have
benefited the program in a positive way should guide future decisions,
Complies with Housing Section Action Items # 22
Lead Department: Housing Authority
Status:
Page 11
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
.c-\
r,
~
55. Study Free-Market Incentive To Build Affordable Housing.
Study the use of the free-market incentive to build Affordable Housing, Determine if the 70/30 and 60/40
components to Planned Unit Developments are adding more free-market job generation than they make
up for in affordable housing provision, Research other incentives to encourage the development of
Affordable Housing, Consider transferring some of the Affordable Housing subsidy monies to the private
sector developers, Private developers should be able to access some amount subsidy per employee housed
provided to the Housing Authority for 100% affordable projects,
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #8, 35
Lead Departments: Community Development; Team Department: Housing Authority
Status:
56. Affordable Housing and Parks Partnerships
. Ensure that parks and open space are available or are provided near development of affordable
housing, especially in areas of increased densities, (033)
. When upzoning for Affordable Housing, consider the pros and cons of deed restricting those portions
of the property that are to be preserved as open space, (036)
. Upon completion of a Master Plan for these individual sites which will identify where open space
should be preserved, deed restrictions should be placed on the property to ensure these open spaces
will be sterilizedfromfuture development, including sterilization from additional affordable
housing.
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #33, 36
Lead Department: Community Development, Parks Department, and Housing Authority
Status:
57. Affordable Housing Residents Survey
Conduct a post-occupancy review of public affordable housing, This process could seek the opinions of
the community in general including those of the new homeowners and their neighbors,
Complies with Housing Section Action Items # 25
Lead Department: Housing Authority
Status: Housing Authority is currently engaged in a survey of residents, but in addition this action item calls
for review of new projects within a year of completion
58. Study Workforce Management
Study ways to manage the size and composition of the workforce and the impacts of doing so, Utilize and
build upon the work initiated by the Aspen Institute group on affordable housing and job growth, Study
ways to better capture the effects of employee generation through employee mitigation,
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #13, #15, Housing Item #1
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
59. Historic Preservation Master Plans
Create Master Plans for key historic properties,
Complies with Action Item: Historic Preservation #4
Lead Department: Community Development & Housing Authority
Status: Civic Center Master Plan under discussion
60. Design Competitions
Study the pros and cons of awarding public projects through design competitions to promote a higher
standard of design and creativity, When possible, sponsor design competitions or other creative methods
for getting the best affordable housing product possible,
Complies with Action Items: Design Quality # 9, Housing Section # 26
Lead Department: Community Development andlor the HOUSing Authority
Status:
Page 12
AACP Action Plan
03102100
"'"'"
f"""\:
61. Develop A "Peak Capacity Standard"
Study the development of a "peak capacity standard" which takes into consideration a peak physical and
social infrastructure capacity. Identify the remaining capacity of the existing infrastructure (schools, fire
department, police, utilities, roads, etc) and relate these numbers to the ultimate available build out and
population potential.
Complies with Growth Section Action Items #2 &3
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
62. Quality of Transit Service in the Region
Improve transit service in the Roaring Fork Valley by increasing the speed, frequency, reliability and
attractiveness of transit service between and within vaHey communities,
Complies with T3
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Impiementation depends on passage of the RTA and on the outcome of the Corridor Investment
Study,
63. Visitor Use of Transit
Work with RFTA to increase visitor use of transit service, including service to and from G1enwood
Springs and other communities in the vaHey,
Complies with T51, 53, 54
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: In the City of Aspen, increases in visitor use will largely be the result of better marketing and some
service improvements not yet designed or implemented, Methods to increase visitor use valley-wide will
depend largely on the transit mode ultimately chosen for the valley transit system (Le" bus or rail),
64. Transit Passenger Safety and Experience
Work with RFT A to improve passenger safety and experience through the foHowing kinds of efforts:
+ Procure transit vehicles that maximize the comfort of riders in order to encourage high rates of use,
For example, transit vehicles should have ample leg and shoulder roOIT! and a.dequate reading lights,
Also, use of quieter and alternative-propulsion vehicles should become standard,
· Develop gUidelines for providing shelters, lighting and bicycle parking at transit stops,
· Improve carriage of bicycles on board transit vehicles and storage of bicycles at transit stops,
· Improve storage of traveler items on transit vehicles and at transit stops,
· Consider dedicating a portion of paid parking revenue to improve transit stop conditions,
Complies with T8, 10-13
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Not yet underway, Depends heavily on the transit mode selected for the trunk system (Le" bus or
rail),
65. Traveler Information
Improve traveler's experience by providing local travel information at bus stops, on the Internet, through
brochures, etc, Reduce travel by visitors in automobiles through support of innovative traveler services,
Develop means to provide real-time information on transit service and road conditions to travelers in the
Roaring Fork Valley, Conduct a study of methods to transferring and checking luggage through from the
airport to hotels, Improve the quality and availability of information on travel options (i,e" transit, lodge
shuttles, walking, bicycling, etc,) provided to visitors both before and after arrival in Aspen, Provide
information to visitors in multiple languages and using international symbols,
Complies with T50, T51, T52, T53, T54
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
Page 13
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
~
~.
; "
o
66. Area-Wide Parking Management
Manage the supply of parking in the Aspen area. Develop remote long-term parking storage facilities as
an alternative. to parking at new or redeveloped housing sites. Consider extending paid parking to any
location in the community where a parking-based travel management program makes sense. Study the
impacts of encouraging or requiring landlords and hotel managers to assess parking fees separately from
housing and commercial rents or room rates. Encourage employers to "cash out" employee parking.
Consider extending the hours of parking enforcement into the evening (particularly during the peak
seasons).
Complies with T35, T36, T37, T38
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Not yet underway.
67. Parks Advisory Board
Explore the creation of a City of Aspen Parks, Open Space, Trails & Natural Resources Advisory Board.
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #13
Lead Department: Parks Department
Status:
68. Reconvene the Public Projects Review Group
Reconvene the Public Projects Review Group.
Complies with Action Items: Design Quality # 7 & 14
Lead Department: Community Development: Historic Preservation
Status:
69. Develop Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA's):
. Work on developing IGA's between the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, the Town of Snowmass Village
and the Town of Basalt regarding containment of development within Community Growth
Boundary's, annexations agreements, or by some other mechanism. (48)
. Consider the impacts of development proposals regionally. Utilize intergovernmental agreements
regarding location of development on a regional basis. Consider including Snowmass Village in our
population figures and as part of our affordable housing solution. Snowmass Village utilizes much of
the same basic infrastructure such as roads, schools, sheriff, landfill, etc. (49)
. Valley-wide coordination of comprehensive plans is encouraged. Create an intergovernmental
agreement regarding a process for dispute resolution. Encourage the development of separate growth
boundaries for each valley community to protect the natural beauty of the valley we share, and to
encourage development to occur in a more economically efficient manner. (52)
Complies with Growth Section Action Items #48,49, 52, Goal G
Lead Department: Community Development
Status: This will be a follow-up activity to the Future Land Use Map and The Aspen/Pitkin Annexation Plan
Update.
70. Encouraging Buy-Downs
Study ways to provide Affordable Housing without new construction such as grants and other assistance
programs for buy-downs and deed restrictions of existing units.
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #9
Lead Departments: Community Development & Housing Authority
Status:
71. Engage Part-Time Residents in Community Affairs
Explore ways to get part-time residents more engaged in the community.
Complies with Action Items:Economic Sustainability # 5
Lead Department:
Status:
Page 14
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
r-.,
,,-..,,
72. Improve Commercial Air Service to Aspen and Pitkin County
Study opportunities to improve customer service and the quality of air service consistent with the Airport
Plan recently adopted by Pitkin County. Work with the airport management staff to determine problems
and opportunities for solutions. Quality air service is critical to our economy.
Complies with T1
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
73. Establish a Greater PresenceQ( the Arts in Transportation
Work with RFTA to establish a greater presence for the arts in transportation. For example:
· Consider allowing riders and others to submit artwork for display on or in vehicles, at stops, on bus
passes, etc.
· Consider encouraging and promoting discussion groups for poetry, short stories, film, etc. on transit
vehicles.
· Consider partnering with the Cornmercial Core Lodging Commission (CCLC) to provide sculpture
and other artwork at transit stops.
· Consider establishing bilingual (i.e., Spanish and English) arts programs for transit.
· Consider sponsoring photograph competitions or exhibitions illustrating the benefits of mass transit.
· Consider encouraging and promoting tutoring of students on transit.
· Consider distributing arts calendars through transit vehicles and stops.
Complies with T15
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Not yet underway.
74. Update Asnen Walkwav and Bikewav Svstem Plan
Update and revise the Aspen Walkway and Bikeway System Plan to include the following:
· Completed or proposed changes to the bikeway and walkway network since 1990.
· Policies and an action plan for improving bicycle storage at or near employment and other activity
sites throughout the Aspen metro area.
· Better integration of bicycles and transit.
· Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service (LOS) standards.
· More in-depth consideration of pedestrian access to transit.
· Traffic calming recommendations.
· Establishment of a more-definite timetable for completion of projects.
· Identification of more-specific project funding sources.
Complies with T18
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Not yet underway.
75. Improve the Bikeway System
Improve bicycle path directness, interconnectivity, and safety through the following:
· Conduct an inventory of locations where bikeways are discontinuous, indirect or poorly maintained.
· Develop an action plan to remedy bikeway deficiencies.
· Implement the trail improvements outlined in the Trail System Refinement Report for the Entrance to
Aspen.
· Implement the trail components of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan (i.e., specifically between Heron
Park and the area around the Ute Children's Park).
Complies with T20
Lead Department: Transportation
Status: Partially underway.
Page 15
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
~
~,
'-
76. Study a "Free Bike" Program
Study the development of a program to provide a fleet of "free-use" bikes in Aspen.
Complies with T22
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
77. Improve Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Security
Where needed, improve bicycle safety through improved signage, striping, shrub maintenance, and
education. Evaluate Aspen street corners to determine if parked cars, shrubs or other objects hinder the
ability of motorists to see pedestrians and vice versa. Study the feasibility and need to increase the
availability of secure bicycle parking (racks and lockers). Study the feasibility of establishing a dedicated
funding source (i.e., budget line item) for bicycle facility maintenance and improvements.
Complies with T21, T26, T23, T24
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
78. Improve Pedestrian Infrastructure
Look for opportunities to improve the pedestrian infrastructure to encourage walking. For example:
. Develop an action plan for sidewalk additions and improvements.
. Improve crosswalk conditions at the intersection of Main and Mill Streets (including reestablishing
the four-second "head start" for pedestrians).
. Improve crossing conditions at appropriate locations along Main Street to enable safer and more
convenient travel by foot through town.
. Improve pedestrian crossing conditions on Highway 82 at Truscott/Golf Course.
. Improve pedestrian crossing conditions on Highway 82 at Buttermilk.
. Improve pedestrian crossing conditions on Highway 82 at 8th Street.
. Improve east-west pedestrian travel conditions in the West End through addition of a walkway that is
detached from the street or that provides some separation between people and moving traffic.
. Instal! a sidewalk on the south side of Puppy Smith Street.
. Install a sidewalk on Red Mountain Road, iffeasible.
. Clean up the Aspen alleys for easier and more pleasant use by pedestrians.
. Install a truck alley/pedestrian way on the north side of Wagner Park (to be consistent with the
proposed master plan for Wagner Park).
Complies with T25
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
79. Sidewalk Ordinance
Where possible, extend the coverage of the sidewalk ordinance of the Aspen Municipal Code to include
all areas within the Aspen City Limits.
Complies with T58
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
80. Complete Community Trail System
Complete community trail systems such as: the Benedict/Roaring Fork River Trail from Herron Park to
the Aspen Club, and the Shadow Mountain TraiL
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #9 & 10
Lead Department: Parks Department
Status:
Page 16
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
~
r-.,
1""""1
;....1
l-
81. Improve Public Access to Parks and Recreation
Improve public access to and information about parks and recreation facilities through brochures and
signage programs.
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #1, 2, 4
Lead Department: Parks Department
Status:
82. Financial Assistance to Encourage Private Affordable Housing
Study options for encouraging the development of affordable housing through financial assistance
programs. Public funds should be made ayailable to groups who propose affordable housing projects
meeting the guidelines and who demonstrate the need for financial assistance.
Complies with Housing Section Action Items # 23
Lead Department: Housing Authority
Status:
83. Increase Rates of Carpool and Vanpool Use
Maintain and improve the appeal of carpools and vanpools for a wide variety of trip types through
expanded ride matching, outreach and education.
Complies with T27, T28, T29
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
84. Reduce the Impacts of Freight and Construction Vehicles in Aspen
Conduct a study of ways to reduce truck traffic in Aspen through alternative means of freight delivery.
Consider prohibiting dump trucks, delivery trucks, semis, and other h~avy vehicles in Aspen during
certain hours of the day or on certain days of the week. Consider establishing a freight consolidation and
redistribution center at or near the AABC or other places in the Roaring Fork Valley. Establish a system
for improving regulation of parking for construction vehicles.
Complies with T47, T48, T49
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
85. Park !lnd Ride
Consider establishing permit-only park-and-ride spaces somewhere near the hospital for use by residents
of upper Castle Creek Road.
Complies with T6
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
86. Improve Traffic Safety and Enforcement
Improve enforcement of traffic regulations on Main Street. Consider reducing the posted speed limit for
traffic on Highway 82 between Truscott and the Castle/Maroon intersection. Redesign the intersection and
area around the Post Office and the Clarks Market parking lot to improve traffic flow and pedestrian
safety.
Complies with T32, T33, T34
Lead Department: Transportation
Status:
Page 17
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
~
~
! .,
87. Study an Impact Fee for Commercial Users of Public Spaces
Study the impacts of commercial operations using public spaces and, if warranted, consider a fee system
to cover costs of repair and maintenance. Such fees could be used to support educational programs,
habitat restoration, enforcement, volunteer efforts and administration costs.
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #6
Lead Department: Parks Department
Status:
88. Infill and Redevelopment: Site Specific Study
Study adding a full or practical floor at the Red Brick Arts Center for affordable office space, art studios,
a community gallery, and/or housing units dedicated to the non-profits.
Complies with Action Items: Arts, Culture and Education #18
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
89. Study the Effects of Low-Paying Jobs
Study the effects oflow-payingjobs on the health of the community.
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #32 and Economic Sustainability Section generally
Lead Department:
Status:
90. Create A Learning Community
Explore ways to create a learning community for both the public and private sectors. One that takes an
action, reflects on the action, and bases its next related action on that reflection. One that makes local
decisions understanding the real causes of problems and with long-term consequences in mind.
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 4
Lead Department:
Status:
91. Support Locally Owned Businesses
Study and consider ways to support a diversity of small, locally owned businesses in the commercial core
as opposed to national chain stores and tourist -only oriented retail.
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #34
Lead Department:
Status:
92. Vertical Zoning - Neighborhood Office
Study locations for a neighborhood office zone district. This concept can incorporate vertical zoning and
alley uses. Develop a Neighborhood Office Zone District. Rezone areas to neighborhood oftlce. Eliminate
the option of single family housing in this zone district.
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 10
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
93. Gallager Amendment
Study ways to better enforce collection of the sales tax and the impacts of the Gallager Amendment.
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 15
Lead Department: Finance Department
Status:
Page 18
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
~
r-.,
t)
'-
94. Study Potential to Limit Chain Stores
Investigate efforts undertaken by other communities for managing the impacts of chain stores.
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 16
Lead Department: Community Development and/or Finance Department
Status:
95. Housing for Visiting Artists: Coordination of Vacancies
The AspenlSnowmass Council for the Arts will work with the Housing Authority to coordinate vacancies
through a central resource/office that tracks current and projected housing development and vacancies.
Complies with Action Items: Arts, Culture and Education #16' .
Lead Department: Housing Authority I The AspenlSriowmass Council for the Arts
Status:
96. Housing for Visiting Artists
Increase short and long-term affordable housing opportunities for arts groups, visiting artists, and
educational workers.
Complies with Action Items: Arts, Culture and Education #14
Lead Department: The AspenlSnowmass Council for the Arts
Status:
97. Housing for Visiting Artists: Incentive Programs
Look for ways, such as tax credits or other incentives, to encourage property owners to allow utilization
of vacant housing (such as un-rented ADU's) for temporary and event-related housing needs for non-
profit groups.
Complies with Action Items: Arts, Culture and Education #15
Lead Department: The AspenlSnowmass Council for the Arts
Status:
98. Study Feasibility of a County Real Estate Transfer Tax
Explore the legality and potential implications of a COlmty Real Estate Transfer Tax. The tax would be
intended to dedicate I % of sales to a pool of money to be split between open space purchases and
development/preservation of affordable housing opportunities in the County, similar to what is done in the
City of Aspen. This would require a state constitutional amendment.
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #51, Goal G
Lead Department: Community Development & Attorneys Office
Status: This would require a state constitutional amendment
99. Improve the Pedestrian Experience and Streets cape on Main Street
In conjunction with ongoing transportation planning projects on Main Street, improve the pedestrian
experience and streetscape.
Complies with Action Items: Economic Sustainability # 14
Lead Department: Community Development
Status:
Page 19
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
~
.~
ADDENDUM: Completed Action Items
The following Action Itemshave been completed as of November 1999, and have therefore been removed
from the list of current work program Action Items.
A. Future Land Use Map
This land use map will formalize the Community Growth Boundaries, identify what land uses and
densities are anticipated in the Aspen metro area, and identify parks and open space parcels that are
important to preserve and which should be maintained and/or acquired. This future land use map will
provide a vision and guide for future la.nd use decisions in the Aspen metro area and depict what the
community can expect to look like in 2020.
Complies with "Action Item Number one" as a top priority
Lead Department: Community Development; Team Departments: Housing and Parks
Status: provisions for final map underway
B. Encouraging Affordable Housing ProvisionlDevelopment
Consider only allowing lodges to be redeveloped as Affordable Housing rather than as expensive free-
market units to reflect our need for housing for permanent residents.
Complies with Growth Section Action Item #12
Lead Department: Community Development
Status: Completed: Lodge Preservation Code revisions
C. Modify the Accessory Dwelling Unit Program
Consider modifications to the Accessory Dwelling Unit program to encourage tmits to be developed
which will be occupied and which offer comfortable living conditions.
Complies with Housing Section Action Items # 13
Lead Department: Community Development
Status: Code amendments completed
D. Open Space Replacement Property
Study and evaluate the idea of revising the city's Sixth Penny Ordinance to require that replacement
property be established prior to an election for trading of open space. Study the benefits and costs of
identifying the replacement parcel in the ballot language. The intention of identifying the parcel would be
to help the electorate in evaluating the benefit of the conversion or replacement interest.
Complies with Action Items: Parks, Open Space and the Environment #20
Lead Department: Parks Department & Attorneys Office
Status: Completed 11199
C:/mydocslaacp/CC actionplan.doc
Page 20
AACP Action Plan
03/02/00
"".".
40/12
[I',
"
,
,
T
NOTES:
J
,,",",,
n,
LEGEND:
~
I
~
~
p
~
flU; sand and gravel, clayey, silty, with cobbles and small boulders, medium dense, moist, dark
brown and black. more clayey with trash in Boring 4.
SAND (SM); slightly silty to silty, slightly clayey, scattered gravel. medium dense, moist,' brown.
Some organics In Boring 4.
SAND AND GRAVEL (GP-GM); with cobbles, possible boulders, slightlyiilty, dense, slightly moist, brown.
Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-lnch I.D. Califomia liner sample.
Drive sample; standard penetration test ( SPT ). 1 3/B-inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D - 15B6.
Drive sample blow count; iridicatei that 4Qblow" a,f a 140-pound hammer failIng 30 incheswere
required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches.
Indicotes slotted PVC pipe installed in boring to depth shown.
Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of log, indicates that multiple attempts were
made tci advance the, boring.
1. Exploratory borings were drilled on February 4, 2000 with 0 4-inch diameter continuous ~ight power auger.
2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approxirnately by pacing from features shown
on the site plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory borings were not meqsured and the logs of exploratory boringi ,are drown to
depth.
4. The exploratory boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied
by the method, used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries
between materiol t~es and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the borings at tfle time of drilling or when checked about 12 days
later. Fluctuation In water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content ( ::c )
DD = Dry Density ( pef )
+4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve.
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve.
Pb = Total Lead Content ( ppm)
I
'\IJQ 1 A.Q
HEPWORTH - PAWlAK
I GEOTECHNICAL, INC. I
Fig. 3
I
LEGEND AND NOTES
~
.--.,
; ,
H'IIJRQIIE"TER ANAl.'YSJS
11llE READINGS
SEVE ANAlYSS
U.s. STMD/IRD SBUES I
a.EAR SQUARE OPENINGS
24HR.7HR
..
100
80
SO
Cl 70
Z
Vi 80
en
<:
"- 50
1-
Z
W ..
'-'
0,;
W 30
"-
20
to
0
MEN. 15 WIN. 60 YlN..19 WIN. ... MlN. 1 V1N. .......... 00 ., "" 8 - 3 "'''''''.. 11~. cr ..."
~
;;;;:;
~
=
~
;:;;;
:::::
~
~
=
~
=:
~
J7.5
100
7S..2 152 203
127
.001
-
.005.009 .019
.037
.07.... .150 .JDO .IIOD 1.18 2.3Ii 4.75 9.5t2..S 1Q.Q
DIAME1ER OF PARllCLES IN MIWME1ERS
I FlNE 'It't.. 'COARSE I
COIlIllE5
aAY 10 SlT
GR1VFl COARSE
ANE
GRAVEL 48 %
UQUlD UMlT
SAND 47
%
SILT AND CLAY 5
%
%
%
PLASllClTY INDEX
and Grovel FROM: Boring
'SIEVE ANALvsis
u.s. STANDARD SERIES I
a.LAR SQJARE oPENINGS
at 7 Feet
SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sand
I
HYDROUElER ANAlYSIS
1lUE REAllIHGS
24 HIt. 7 HR
..
100
hIlN. 15 MIN. 6DWIN...19.... 4UIN. 1 UN. ...... 00 !lO - M8 .. 3M1J2"'3/.... " ~. cr "'8'
~
~
=
=
~
~
==:::
==
~ ::::::::
=
~
t:::::
~
~
F""
80
80
CJ 70
Z
Vi 60
en
<:
"- 50
1-
Z
W ..
'-'
0,;
W JO
"-
20
1.
0
J7.s
100
7&2 152. 2m
127
.QQ.5.009 .m9
.037
.074 .150 .3QD .GOO 1.1B 2.38 4.75 9.512..5 lR.D
DIAME1ER OF PARllCLES IN MIWME1ERS
I fINE .... '''''''''''' 1
COIlIllE5
.llO1
.002
Q.AY TO SILT
T
COARSE
ANE
SANO 48 %
SILT AND CLAY 12 %
GRAVEL 40 %
UQUID UMIT %
SAMPLE OF: Clayey Sand and GRovel
!t".
,.
m
JO a
w
z
.. ::;;:
1-
W
50 0,;
1-
Z
60 W
'-'
0::
7. W
"-
80
..
!t".
,.
20
JO a
w
z
.., ::;;:
1-
W
50 0::
1-
Z
80 W
'-'
0::
70 W
"-
80
..
-
".;"
PLASTICITY INDEX %
(Fill) FROM:8cring 2 ct 10 end 15 Feet Combined
I
100 140
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK.
I GEOTECHNiCAL. iNC. I
GRADA llON TEST RESULTS
Fig. 4
I
".
c.i
~
..1
<(
u
-
2:
:J:'
U
w
"0 a; a; a; u: a;
> > > >
C ell ell ell ell
ell ~ ~ ~ > ~
"0 a a a ell a
~ c "0 "0 "0 (J "0
" > ell C C C C
~ en .?:
0 ~ ell ell ell ell
~ " > "0 a; ,
<; 0 "0 "0 "0
w " .:: c c c > c
0 ell
w u; "' ell '" ~ ell
'" en en en a en
>- > > > > >
-;::'" '" '" CIl CIl
J:: > > > > "0 >
OJ ell "'- ell- ~= C ell-
.- ~ uu: uiI '" uiI
U;<:J uu: en
~
~ 0 z ;; O'l 0
g ;0 ~ ~ co OJ
z
~ ~ 0 '" ~ ~
"
0 w
w > '"
z u; ~
~ .. " "
z w Z ~
" w
0 ~ ~
" "
z 0
~ "
" ~
" ~
~ .. 0
< ;!
;; .: .
~
"
"
w
.
"
w
~ 0 ~
5 ;; ~
0
~ ~
~ " 8
z z ~ N "<t N
l'l u; N co
" '" ci u; ~ co "<t
~ ;;: z
'.
0 I
z ~ I"- OJ
< "<t . "<t
z ..
0 .' . . . .
"
~
<
" ~
" w OJ 0
> ~ .
< "<t "<t
"
" .
~ /: (Q
~ > \l
~ " u; 0 .
~ 0 z " ~
w
Z 0
~ w \;
~ " 0) LO N
i: ~ ~ co
~ .. OJ 0
~ s z N co N
0 ~
z " "
co
~
z ~ . l"- N co ~ ~ 0
0 w ~ co ~
" 0 0
<
" ~
0
~
~ .
~
" "
1:\ ~ ~ N cry "<t
o
'<t
-
o
o
-
o
Z
to
o
...,.
Ll..
o
>-
a:
<(
:2
:2
::J
en
lUg
I"""';
f\
,
I~_ull-i iiilij.'iill
0 0
40/6.10/0 21/5.10/0 Z1 /7.10/0
T T Pb=159
5 20/0 SO/10 12/6.10/0 5
6/12
Pb=1BO
WC=1B.S
40/12 -200-S+
... WC=2.S -
" "
" +....48 "
"- -200=5 u...
10 19/12 14/12 10
.<:: .c
WC=20.2 -
... Q.
0- 00=106 "
"
Cl }~ -200=42 Cl
H=4O
-200=12
15 20/12 10/12 15
.......... ... "'1"'1
IUU l'""tU
-..,
p .0
BORING 1
BORING 2
BORING 3
20
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3.
~~PWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
~
BORING 4
~ccs CF EXPLORATORY eORt!'!GS
20
F1g. 2
~4.::
l \
........... .... ............-...
.. ... ........... ...................
--. ...- .'........ -... . ............... ......
..-...... ...-. .... .... ......................
...... .... ...' ......-. ..... ...................
..-..... ...... -....... ." -... ...........-.....
. ...... ..-. ...-...... ... ................ .......
.. ... '" -..... ........ .... .... .-.-....... -......
.. ........... ....-. ..... -. .... .................-.
-...... ... ...... ......... -.. .... ..-........ '" ....
_.. .--....... ....-.....-. .... .... ...................
..................... ...-...- .... ... ......... .......
.. .... . ......- .........
,'::::::::';r;:"tV:::::' .
,-:,:,:::::~\",::':-'
. ...-.pt:.....(.. --......
....-- ....
. . . . - . .. . .
.-... .....'
.'. -: .:::::: ::~:::: :~~~:: ::: ~::::.-
.. .. .. ..o~f<I- .. ..
-........_......., f..>.......
:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:r.-:-:-:-:-:.'
~
~
. - - - . . . .
. . . . . . - .
. .......
.. ......
.' - ....
.......-
... ....
... .....
. . . . . . . .
... ....
.
BORING 4
... .....
..' ....
. . . . . . . .
.. ......
... ....
. ......
.. ......
.. ...-.
.......
.. .....
EXISTING
PA1HS
RIO GRANDE PARK
IV. M1'-L
S""~~r
I
100 140
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
I GEOTECHNiCAL, ii-iC. I
Fig. 1
1""""1
r)
City of Aspen Park Department
March 2, 2000
Page 4
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at
the locations indicated on Fig, 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience
in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at.the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurfuce
conditions may not become evident uIrtil excavation is performed. If conditions
encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we
should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendatioru; may be made.
This report has been prepared for the eXClusive use by our client for design purposes.
Weare not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolVes, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
co:nstruction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recomrnlelld on-site o1:Jservation of l:Jl:c'!-y'!-ti.(jJF! and fO~cIati.oIl:
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by' a representative of the geotechnical .
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEO:;rJiCHNICAL, INC.
. ~~ RE~f1.'7'~.
~ ....<elo 'l'~~
, I N ~., E, H;l' .<:;\
Daniel E. Hardin, P.: <:.r 24 s"''''j '}
~ . 3h/~ .."...
Reviewed By: 'f!.~" l{;2j
'-"22~.. ....'1 ~ ~
C) . 'lll ~s.""'"'' ~t$-"
" ( J!.Qti"I..!....~~
'" ....'fUlll1l1ln-.
.. J '10~
Jordj Z, fciar:pson, Jr., P
I 'I
DllH/kSm
attachments
H-P GEOTECH
--'t
!\
,..-.,
City of Aspen Park Department
March 2, 2000
Page 3
. Fill Quality: The fill at the site contains organics and some trash but appears to be
mainly clayey to silty sand and gravel. The measured total lead conte~ts were 159 ppm
in Boring 2 and 180 ppm in Boring 3. Typically, the action level in the Aspen area for
mine tailings is 1000 ppm total lead. Based on the test results, it appears that the fill at
this site does not contain significant mine tailings. The fill is variable and is probably
not suitable for support of the proposed structures.
Foundation Recommendations: Consid~ring the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed skateboard park construction, we
recommend retaining wall spread footings or slabs placed on the undisturbed natural
granular soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Footings
should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns (if
any). The existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation
should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed
natural soils. As an alternative, design footing grades could be re-establishedwith
compacted structural fill. The fill should consist of on-site or imported sandy gravel
soils devoid of topsoil, organics and oversized rock compacted to at least 100% of the
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Footings
should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost
protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically
used in this area. Retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth
pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil
(excluding organics and debris) as backfill.
Slabs-on-Grade: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of fill, are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. The requirements for joint Spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the
intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed
beneath deeper level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus
2 inch aggregate with less than 50 % passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2 % passing
the No. 200 sieve.
Prior to fill placement, the existing fill should be further evaluated or completely
removed from beneath the slab areas. All fill materials for support of slabs should be
compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content
near optimum. Required fill can consist of on-site or imported sandy gravel soils
devoid of debris, vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles .and practices in this area at this time. We make no
H-P GEOTECH
,'-
r\
Co. ,CounCil
Approved
ByOrd1nance
RYhfhtt-6--
, 19_
RESOLUTION NO.
(SERIES OF 1993)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO APPROVING THE RIO GRANDE MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the Aspen city Council (hereinafter "council) has
been requested to endorse the Rio Grande Master Plan which has been
adopted by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, Council directed staff to prepare a master plan for
the Rio Grande property, specifically the area between Rio Grande
Drive and the Roaring Fork River; and
WHEREAS,
staff,
together with community members
and
representatives of community organizations, identified general land
use concepts for future development of the property; and
WHEREAS, .a land use map was created that identifies specific
areas of the Rio Grande property with general land use themes and
is incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, other maps were prepared and incorporated into the
Master Plan to act as guides in ensuring that development of
specific uses can be accommoda~~d o~ the property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rio Grande Master Plan and applicable
provisions of the Municipal Code, development review for site
specific projects for the Rio Grande parcels shall be reviewed
through the Specially Planned Area development review; and
WHEREAS, the Council reviewed the proposed Master Plan at a
worksession held January 7, 1993 and provided comments to staff and
the Rio Grande Group; and
"
City Council
,~ '~pproved
oy Ordinance
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
ADOPTING THE RIO GRANDE MASTER PLAN
Exhibi t (,)
, 19__
Resolution No. 92-
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission (hereinafter
"Commission") have the responsibility and the authority to adopt
comprehensive plans for Aspen; and
WHEREAS, the Commission and City Council 0irected staff to
prepare a Master Plan for the publically owned Rio Grande property,
with attention focused primarily on the area between Rio Grande
Drive and the Roaring Fork River; and
WHEREAS, staff, together with commun.ity members and
representatives of community organizations forming the Rio Grande
Group, identified general land use goals and recommendations for
future development of the property; and .
. WHEREAS, a land use !1lap has been created that identifies
specific ar~as of the Rio Grande property with general land use
themes, which map shall be adopted with the Master Plan and
incorporated therein; and
WHEREAS, three other land use maps have been prepared and
included iri Appendix A of the Master Plan to ensure that
development of specific uses can be accommodated on the property,
however, these maps are intended to be used only as guides; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has formally reviewed the Master Plan
at regularly scheduled meeting April 20, 1993; a.nd
WHEREAS, a duly noticed Public Hearing was held by the
Commission on June 8, 1993 to consider the Master Plan for the Rio
Grande property.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED by the Commission that it
does hereby adopt the Rio Grande Master Plan.
APPROVED by the Commission at their regular meeting on June 8,
1993.
ATTEST:
ASPEN PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk
Jasmine Tygre, Chairperson
,
r"',
{\
~
IXa
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and council AI ~
Amy Margerum, city Manager ~ ;:,
Diane Moore, city planning Direct~
Leslie Lamont, Senior Planner
TO:
THRU:
THRU:
DATE:
June 14, 1993
RE:
Rio Grande Master Plan - Endorsement
SUMMARY: Attached is the Rio Grande Master Plan thai:. the Planning
and Zoning Commission adopted at a June 8, 1993 public hearing.
staff was under the impression that a conceptual SPA master plan
was being created for approval by Council. The city Attorney has
determined that the document and related maps are in fact a "Master
Plan" because the plan does not address development issUes for site
specific proposals. A plan that establishes general guidelines
and goals should be used as a Master Plan to guide future
development. When site specific development is proposed the full
SPA review process will then be used for development review.
Fortunately, a master plan does not expire after two years like a
conceptual SPA Master Plan. The Master Plan remains. in effect
until it is either amended or superseded by another plan. The
various organizations that participated in the Master Planning
process thought that conceptual SPA review was being accomplished
and only final SPA review (a 2 step vs. 4 step review process)
would be necessary before their particular development. However,
staff recently amended the Land Use Code to enable an applicant to
consolidate the four step SPA review process into a two step review
process, similar to PUD review. Therefore, if an applicant
submits an application for development soon after the Master Plan
is adopted and the proposal is consistent with the Master Plan, a
consolidated SPA review may be appropriate.
The planning and Zoning commission adopts a Master Plan by
Resolution and Council shall endorse the Commission's adopted plan.
Please see the attached Resolution adopting the Master Plan.
CURRENT ISSUES: Staff has been working with a citizen committee,
the Rio Grande Group, to formulate the Rio Grande Master Plan. The
Group has recommended several land use actions and developed three
land use development scenarios. Those three scenarios are
represented by the land use maps provided in Appendix A of the
plan. The maps are intended to serve as guides for site specific
development. Based upon the Planning and Zoning Commissioner
comments at the last meeting, the three "potential Development
n
,
/
..(,
II)
Julie Ann Woods, 08:41 AM 3/8/00 -0700, Fwd: Rio Grande Master Plan/SPA
X-Sender: juliew@comdev
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 08:41 :20 -0700
To: Joyceo@ci.aspen.co.us
From: Julie Ann Woods <juliew@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Fwd: Rio Grande Master pla(1/SPA
Cc: Jeffw@ci.aspen.co.us
I
Joyce--I think we'll need to fast track this. Let's get someone assigned to this ASAP, even
before an application comes in, so we can get a hearing scheduled, etc. otherwise all hell may
break out at home. . . 2 step should be fine. any chance for getting through review and permit
by may? JA 10'> 'l~~ Da,.'-teu
l'
rq~~
(fl.;,.....~t I
r
X-Sender: rebeccas@commons
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 200015:40:07 -0700
To: juliew@ci.aspen.co.us
From: Rebecca Schickling <rebeccas@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Rio Grande Master Plan/SPA
Cc: scottc@ci.aspen.co.us, jeffw@ci.aspen.co.us
-
Af'^ l
Af""'I"
Jvto.'{
l~ +~
l4 ~~
'b tk
Julie Ann,
Well unfortunately for us, after reading the resolution, I believe we have to submit a development
plan for this site specific use. Even though the adopted master plan has specific references to a
skateboar~e resolution states "pursuant to the Rio Grande Master Plan and
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, development review for site sp""ific projects for the
Rio Grande parcels shall be reviewed through the Specially Planned Area development
. "
review....
I did look at the Land Use Code under the section of SPA and it is a 4 step process but may be
reduced to a 2 step process by the Planning Director if the full 4 step process would be
redundant and serve no public purpose. May I request that we be allowed a 2 step process
because a skateboard park is identified in the master plan? Also, if we submit an application
next week do you have any idea of how long it may take us to get through the process? We are
trying to look at breaking ground in mid to late May if possible. Thanks..,.
Rebecca Schickling
Assistant Parks Director
City of Aspen
Printed for Joyce Ohlson <joyceo@ci.aspen.co.us>
1
. .
,
.
n
r"l
, ~
." Julie Ann Woods, 10:51 AM 3/8/00 -0700, Skateboard park
X-Sender' juliew@comdev
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 10:51 :04 -0700
To: Jeffw@cLaspen.co.us, Scottc@cLaspen.co.us, Rebeccas@cLaspen.co.us,
Joyceo@ci.aspen.co.us
From: Julie Ann Woods <juliew@cLaspen.co.us>
Subject: Skateboard park
Cc: Russellg@cLaspen.co.us, Stephenk@cLaspen.co.us
Okay--
Here's the scoop. I spoke with Russell regarding permits that may be needed for the skateboard
park. He said that as long as there was no wall or structure higher than 6' that no permit would
be necessary. I also explained that the expert bowl would likely have an excavation of 8', but that
the grade would likely be brought up to the edge, or in no case exceed a 6' like-wall. The city
does not currently require a grading and/or excavation permit (county does). The only other type
of permit that I. might think you may need is if you intend to light the park with additional lighting
fixtures then you may need an electrical permit. Also, I presume there will be some sort of drain in
the bowl. Russell, could you please verify whether or not either lights or a drain would require
permits? Would ACSD require anything? it wouldn't be sanitation, but it would be storm water--
would a sand separator be required before it goes into the sewer? please advise all. thanks for
everyone's time on this. JA.
Printed for Joyce Ohlson <joyceo@ci.aspen.co.us>
1
r""'\
r!tJ
(")
,;;I
THE CITY or ASPEN
~.IBIIIMI AWII J
IIMJ
MEETING DATE:
04/18/2000
NAME OF PROJECT:
SKATEBOARD PARK RIO GRANDE SPA
CITY CLERK:
Jackie Lothian
STAFF:
Nick Lelack
WITNESSES: (1)
(2)
(3)
Rebecca Schickling
Scott Chism
Jon Busch
(4)
(5)
(6)
Tammy Dawson
Alan Osborn
Mitch Haas
EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report (X) (Check If Applicable)
2 Affidavit of Notice (X) (Check If Applicable)
3 Board Criteria Sheet (X) (Check If Applicable)
4 Various maps, drawings bluelines (not in exhibits)
MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve the Specially Planned Area Review to bnild a
Skateboard Park and relocatethe basketball courts on .Rio Grande Site B finding that all ofthe
criteria have been met and to adopt P&Z Resolution# 21-2000 wiih conditions: 1. All prior City
of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect. 2.. Emergency vehicle access to the
theatre shall be maintained, 3. Currently, the fire extinguisher demonstration classes are
performed on the present basketball courts. The Parks Department shall consider a court
surface that will allow for the continuation of t~ese de~o.llstratilln classes~ 4. The Applicant
shall relocate the existing conduit to the satisfaction of the Electric Department. 5. The
Applicant shall install water facilities to the relocated ~rilll<ing fountain at the entrance to Rio
Grande Park. 6. A water spigot for the cleanout of the area should be provided. It may be
possible to use the irrigation lines if there is no change in the back flow. 7. The applicant shall
not track mud onto City streets during construction, A washed rock or other style mud rack
must be installed on site during construction, 8. Prior to Construction: a. The Applicant shall
obtain a tree removal permit for the removal of trees on site. b. The Applicant shall submit and
the City Engineer shall approve a drainage plan for the site, Drainage shall be controlled in a
way that is beneficial to use the flood routing concept which would control the water flow from
drainage through depressions in the landscaping. 9. The Applicant shall provide a Trolley
System overlay on the Rio Grande Park site plan to City Council, demonstrating how the
proposed skateboar!i park, basketball court, and landscaping would affect the potential for a
Trolley System. Transportation rights for Rio Grande Park shall be superior to all other rights
in the future. Tim Mooney second. Roll call vote: Buettow, yes; Erickson, yes; Haneman, yes;
Tygre, no; Hunt, no; Mooney, yes; Blaich, yes. APPROVED 5-2.
VOTE:
YES_5_
NO 2
ROBERT BLAICH
ROGER HUNT
ROGER HANEMAN
RON ERICKSON
YES
YES
YES _X_
YES_X_
-"_ NO
NO _X_
NO
NO
JASMINE TYGRE YES NO _X_
TIMOTHY MOONEY YES _X_ NO
STEVEN BUETTOW YES _X_ NO
CHARLES VRESILOVIC alternate
PZVOTE
h
n
>( '/
Aspen Consolidated SanitatioJ:l pi~tri9t
,
Sy Kelly * Chainnan
Paul Smith * Treas
MichaelKelly * Secy
. John Keleher
Frank Loushin
Bruce Matherly, Mgr
April 4, 2000
. Nick Lelack
Community Development
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Skateboard Park
Dear Nick:
The proposed skateboard park is located withinou.r service,area. CoIirIection to the public
wastewater system is not being proposed. The project, as proposed, will have no 'impact upon the
public wastewater system.
,
Sincerely,
~ <----' ""'M~-<.J-d
Bruce Matherly
Distri9t Manager
. .... ,,'..', ,.,' ,', ',,',., ....
565 N, MillSt.;Aspen, CO 8161{i(970)925-3661/FAX'(970) 925-2537