Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.council.19940328Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 Mayor Bennett called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. with Councilmembers Waggaman, Richards and Paulson present. CITIZEN COMMENTS . 1. Les Holst commended Cris Caruso for his help in clearing off the roof at the Red Brick School building. Holst said Caruso worked before and after work to shovel the roof. 2. Les Holst said when Council keeps to their vision, positive things happen like the ice rink and Red Brick School. These are projects that stay within the scale and parameter of the community. Holst said the superblock is the scale of Hollywood and is not in the dimensions of this community. 3. Sy Coleman said recently there was an article in the paper that there have been less cars in town. Coleman said one reason for this could be that things the Council and Commissioners are doing, like promoting the bus and car pooling, are working. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1. Amy Margerum, city manager, reminded Co uncil they had scheduled a meeting with the Commissioners for April 5 to discuss the growth management quota system changes. Staff will not be ready for this meeting. Ms. Margerum suggested Council keep this and discuss resident occupied units. If the BOCC cannot meet, Council can meet with the housing authority and discuss RETT. Mayor Bennett said it has also been suggested that the Council and Commissioners schedule a meeting to talk about things in general. Councilwoman Richards emphasized as many members be present to trying and bring closure to the resident occupied unit discussion. 2. Amy Margerum, city manager, announced there is a Roaring Fork Forum meeting scheduled for April 7. Councilwoman Richards said she will be in Denver at a CAST meeting, meeting with the legisla- tors before they wrap up their session. 3. Bill Efting, assistant city manager, told Council staff has been working on the "no parking here to corner" spaces at one intersection and trying things like bike racks, benches and planters. There have been about 15 suggestions submitted on what to do with this space. These will be sent to the Neighborhood Advisory Committee who will forward the top 3 to Council. 4. Kathryn Koch, city clerk, told Council staff is advertising for P & Z, Clean Air Board, Board of Adjustment and the Liquor License Authority. The deadline for application is April 5. Council should schedule an interview date for sometime in April. 1 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt the consent calendar; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. The consent calendar is: A . Minutes - February 28; March 7, 14, 1994 B . Resolution #24, 1994 - Aspen Mountain PUD Escro w Extension Agreement C . Resolution #18, 1994 - Extension of Time to Record Truscott Plat D . Resolution #19, 1994 - Transferring Deed on Kraut Property E . Resolution # 20, 1994 - IGA Community Development Department F . Resolution #21, 1994 - Contract Pitkin County Telephone and Radio Services G . Resolution #22, 1994 - HPC Guidelines H . Resolution #23, 1994 - Professional Design Services Contract - N. Mill and Puppy Smith streets and Utilities Rebuild All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #4, SERIES OF 1994 - Billings Subdivision/PUD, GMQS Exemption Mary Lackner, planning office, reminded Council this is a request to resubdivide the Astor subdivision on King street from 3 lots to 4 lots. Currently each of the 3 lots has a duplex, one unit of which is fully deed restricted. The applicant has gone through the growth management system for the 4th lot, which will contain a free market and affordable housing unit. The subdivision is zoned R-6, surrounded by R-15 and a park to the east. Ms. Lackner said there was considerable neighborhood concern, which has been addressed except for a request for 2 specific conditions; (1) there is to be no further subdivision beyond these 4 lots and (2) the developer of the newly created lot pay for utility relocation for one of the neighbors. These have been included into the conditions of approval. The neighbors have submitted a letter of support. Sunny Vann, representing the applicant, showed the subject parcel. Vann told Council in the late 1970's this was one parcel, zoned R- 15 with two existing small duplexes. The applicant was told she would have to eliminate two of the units to comply with the zoning. The city suggested if one-half of each duplex were deed restricted and also provide a deed restricted unit as part of the new single family residence, the property could be rezoned to R-6, and subdivided into 3 parcels exempt from growth management. That was accomplished. Each duplex has a deed restricted unit under the affordable housing requirement. The house has a deed restricted 2 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 unit. Vann noted the subdivision in 1980 did not preclude further development; however, it did contain a provision that any further development be subject to growth management. Vann pointed out the applicant is also trying to solve some site problems with the new subdivision. The subdivision solves setback problems and creates 3 equal size lots along the street with FARs that are consistent with what can be built on the rest of the property. Vann said the city has requested a strip of land along the front be dedicated for future right-of-way purposes. This dedication further reduces the FAR for the 3 frontage lots. Vann said as a result of deducting the easement and right-of-way, lot 1 can have a 3700 square foot duplex including a 600 square foot affordable unit. Vann said the neighborhood was concerned there could be further subdivision. Vann said the applicant agree to prohibit any further subdivision of this property. Vann noted this request has the recommendation of staff and P & Z. Vann said this proposal allows one additional free market unit of 3700 square feet and includes an affordable housing unit and the city gets a right-of-way and a sidewalk easement and review of building envelope on lot 1. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. Tom Isaac, adjacent property owner, told Council some neighbors have discussed this proposal and feel their concerns have been met. Isaac said this proposal is consistent with the density of the neighborhood; however, any further density would not be consistent with the neighborhood. Lance Luckett, 975 King street, supported this application. Stewart Ross, 981 King street, also supported this and pointed out all the existing units are being rented to locals at below market rental. Rick, tenant, also supported the proposal. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Mayor Bennett asked if there is anything that prohibits redevelop- ment of lots 2 and 3. Vann said these lots could be redeveloped; they are encumbered that one of each duplex must be replaced as affordable housing. The land given to the city for rights-of-way will reduce the size of the structures. Councilman Paulson asked about height restrictions. Vann said there is no proposal to restrict the height other than the zone district limitation, which is 25 feet above natural grade. Vann pointed out the R-6 district has a maximum site coverage limitation, which addresses the lot line to lot line build out. 3 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 Vann reiterated the applicant has deed restricted 3 units in exchange for 1 new single family house in 1980. Vann said the applicant is also mitigating the impact of the new lot with an on- site afford able housing unit. Fifty percent of the 8 units will be deed restricted to affordable housing. Vann said part of this request is to vary the minimum lot size by the amount of the easement on lot 1 and the right-of-way being taken by the city. Diane Moore, planning director, pointed out the land use code encourages housing mitigation on-site rather than cash-in-lieu. Ms. Moore said this application needs a lot area variation to provide for the duplex, which includes the employee deed restricted unit. Councilwoman Waggaman said she supports this; it will always be deed restricted housing for 4 units. The neighbors have worked out their concerns with the applicant. Mayor Bennett said he is troubled by a 4200 square foot house on a parcel this size; however, that is what is allowed by the land use code. Councilman Paulson agreed he would like to see a smaller house. Councilwoman Richards said changing the FAR would be months of review and would also make many lots non-conforming. Councilwoman Richards said she does not feel any value in trying to stop this subdivision. Vann suggested condition #2 in Section 2 say "Prior to issuance of any building permits for lot 1 ". Vann said there will be improve- ments to some existing units. Vann told Council the Aspen Area Community Plan identifies King street as a pedestrian corridor and recommends a sidewalk on that corridor. Vann said in the applica- tion, they agree to enter into a sidewalk improvement agreement and pay a pro rata share of the sidewalk. Vann said the engineer has asked for construction of a sidewalk along the entire property at the time a building permit is issued for lot 1. Vann noted there is not plan for a sidewalk on the rest of the frontage. Installing a sidewalk would require elimination of the fencing and much of the front yard of the two existing duplexes. Vann requested the applicant be allowed to install the sidewalk when there is a plan for the entire neighborhood. Amy Margerum, city manager, pointed out staff and the Neighborhood Advisory Committee recommend people put the sidewalk in at the time the lots are developed. Ms. Margerum said the reason is otherwise it can be years before there are sidewalks. The requirement is in the pedestrian walkway plan. Ms. Margerum said there is not an overall plan for King street right now. Vann noted there are no other lots on King street which are subject to subdivision. Ms. Lackner said these 3 lots make up about half of this block of King street and is a great start on a sidewalk. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #4, Series of 1994, 4 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 on second reading, with the amendment in Section 2 changing the wording to "lot 1", that the name of the subdivision shall remain the Astor subdivision, and that the applicant shall construct a sidewalk along the Astor subdivision at the time lot 1 is devel- oped, that the right-of-way width shall be indicated on the final plat acceptable to the city engineer; seconded by Councilman Paulson. Councilwoman Waggaman said she does not see a reason to put sidewalks in front of the existing duplexes and make them less habitable. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would rather go along with approving sidewalks installed as each lot is developed. A tenant told Council installing a sidewalk will really affect the unit he lives in, the view and the sunlight. Ms. Margerum said staff can work with the neighborhood to develop a plan for the sidewalk and until this plan is in place, the sidewalks do not have to be put in. This would be a plan for the entire block. Vann said that would work for the applicant. Vann said they would agree to install the sidewalk on lot 1 at building permit, and on lots 2 and 3 will be deferred until such time the city has a plan for King street. Councilwoman Waggaman said it does not make sense to have an applicant put in a sidewalk until there is a plan. Worcester suggested paragraph #3 read "The applicant shall construct a sidewalk along lot 1 of the Astor subdivision at the time lot 1 is developed. The standard city sidewalk agreement shall be executed and recorded for lots 2 and 3 prior to the recordation of the final plat. A curb and gutter agreement shall be executed and recorded prior to recordation of final plat." That gives the city the right to require the sidewalk anytime necessary. Councilwoman Richards moved to amend the motion to include the language on item 3 of section 3 as suggested by Worcester; seconded by Councilman Paulson. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Paulson, yes; Waggaman, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #7, SERIES OF 1994 - Appropriations Rob Umbreit, budget director, told Council this appropriation ordinance carries forward about $4 million in capital projects that were not complete in 1993. Any new items were listed in the memorandum. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #7, Series of 1994, on second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. Roll call 5 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. 6 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 ORDINANCE #8, SERIES OF 1994 - Amending Liquor License Authority John Worcester, city attorney, pointed out he has amended the ordinance to change the number of members from 3 members to 5 members and to put into language in Section 4.1 which talks about the legislative declaration in an attempt to put in words Council's philosophy and mission statement for the authority. Mayor Bennett asked to add a sentence at the end of the legislative declaration reading, "The City Council desires that the separate liquor licensing authority carry out its mission in as streamlined a fashion as possible and that it seek to avoid the creation of new and burdensome paperwork for either the city or its citizens". Council agreed. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #8, Series of 1994, on second reading as amended; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Waggaman, yes; Paulson, no; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. APPEAL OF PLANNING DIRECTOR INTERPRETATION FOR POPPIE'S Diane Moore, planning director, told Council Poppie's Bistro Cafe requested an interpretation from the planning director regarding the allowable FAR in the R-6 zone district. This is a two-story building on 6,000 square foot lot and is a non-conforming use in the R-6 zone district. The current FAR is 2980 square feet. The applicant would like to construct a deed restricted housing unit on site. In order to accomplish this the structure will have to receive a landmark designation to take advantage of the incentives and also to receive a GMQS exemption. The applicant would like to build a 970 square foot employee unit. Ms. Moore told Council in the past staff has looked at the lot area and made a determination of the appropriate FAR. 6,000 square feet lot is the minimum lot for a single family dwelling. The applicant would like the interpretation that the appropriate FAR is that of a duplex, which would be 3600 square feet. There is a provision in the code that would not permit the duplex FAR on this site. Ms. Moore said with landmark designation, the applicant could construct a deed restricted unit of 760 square feet; however, the applicant is interested in a two bedroom unit. Ms. Moore told Council staff does not feel the duplex FAR is appropriate in this case. Ms. Moore said there are other ways to accomplish this; one is rezoning and the other would be a text amendment to provide for an increase in FAR for affordable housing units. Ms. Moore requested Council 7 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 affirm staff's interpretation. Sunny Vann, representing the applicant, pointed out this is next to the Forest Service, which is zoned R-6/SPA, and across the street is zoned RMF. Vann said an affordable housing unit in the R-6 zone is permitted by right. Vann said the applicant would like to build a deed restricted unit for a family. There is a 200 square foot difference between what he can build and what he would like to build. Vann said the planning office has suggested alternatives, both of which are amenable to the applicant. Vann noted both rezoning and code amendments are larger applications and the costs are greater. Vann said this application for interpreta tion al lows the applicant and Council an opportunity to discuss. Vann said the provision of housing is desirable and consistent with the recently adopted AACP. Michael Hull, applicant, told Council there is ample room in the building to accommodate this request. There are no setbacks involved. Mayor Bennett said he favors supporting the interpreta- tion of the planning director. Mayor Bennett said he would support a rezoning as this is surrounded by high density, is on an extremely busy street, and is a very small request. Councilwoman Richards agreed and said this request has merit. Councilwoman Richards said she is not inclined to go against the planning director's interpre tation because of the precedence this might set for other struc tures in the R-6 zon e. Councilwoman Richards said rezoning would clean up the non-conformity of this building. Ms. Moore told Council the rezoning or code amendment have the same time frame; the rezoning would get rid of the non-conforming use status. Leslie Lamont, planning office, told Council in a code amendment staff would need to evaluate what the amendment does to the rest of the uses. Council directed the applicant to pursue rezoning and to complete the historic designation. Councilwoman Richards moved to uphold the planning director's interpretation; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, with the exception of Councilwoman Waggaman. Motion carried. Council- woman Waggaman said she is frustrated by this process and the paperwork boondoggle. WEST END TRAFFIC STUDY Bob Gish, public works director, told Council staff has met with west end residents, RFTA representatives, M.A.A. and P & Z to review the Aspen Meadows traffic mitigation plan. Gish said the group felt that the entire west end should be looked at. The emphasis was pedestrian safety, bicycle safety, enhancing the pedestrian experience, reducing the number of vehicle trips, 8 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 maximizing public transportation, reducing noise and pollution, alternate bus routes, and traffic control devices. Gish told Council this discussion will focus on those items that the committee is in agreement on. These are (1) an endorsement of revisions to overall west end traffic devices; (2) additional lighting on Lake avenue; and (3) to request a work session with Council to discuss those items not agreed upon. Gish told Council there is a meeting with P & Z April 5 to discuss the traffic mitigation plan that was a requirement of the Aspen Meadows approval. Gish showed Council the existing traffic patterns, stop signs and pedestrian walkway in the west end. Gish said Third street has been defined as the main route to the music tent. The group is recommending the stop signs be increased from 62 to 79 signs; the yield signs reduced from 6 to 2, and the uncontrolled intersec tions reduced from 15 to 2. Gish said the group is aware of visual pollution that will be caused by these increased signs. This plan is to try and create an enhanced pedestrian experience down Fourth street. There are financial implications in this plan. Edward Sweeney, M.A.A., showed Gillespie street and the revised parking lot at the M.A.A. The walkway is continued into the tent from Fourth street with trees and lighting. Sweeney told Council this new design will get the buses off Gillespie street and into the parking lot where there will be a bus shelter and pull off area. The entrances to the parking lot will be from Third and Fifth. Sweeney told Council the M.A.A. publishes the walking route and bus schedule; it is on their calendar and mailed in every ticket envelope; all the promotional materials emphasize the pedestrian experience and transit. Sweeney told Council the bicycle program for the students is very popular; the M.A.A. could use another 200 bikes. Gish noted part of this plan is to protect and emphasize Fourth street as a pedestrian entrance. Gish said one way to do this is put superducks on each side of the intersection up and down Fourth. There will be "Yield to Pedestrian" signs for the main intersec- tion. Gish requested speed bumps on Third and Fifth and elimina- tion of some stop signs on Third and Fifth. Gish said as part of the Meadows traffic mitigation plan, the group is requesting "Children Playing" signs as well as speed bumps. Gish said the M.A.A will not allow cars on Gillespie right before, during and after events at the music tent. This will be done with temporary barricades. Gish said these requests have a financial impact of about $6,000 and will have a continuing operating impact on the streets department. 9 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 Gish said another request is additional lighting on Lake street from Gillespie to Smuggler and Lake. This is a very dark area. The request is to add 6 additional lights. Gish told Council this has been a recommendation for years. Gish said this will cost about $5,000 and could be done this year. As an alternative, staff would put this in the budget for consideration in 1995. Gish said staff has not had a chance to talk to the neighbors about installa- tion of lights, but this will be done. There are things that can be done to mitigate lights shining in people's homes. George Vicenzi told Council the traffic impacts are such that people are considering leaving the west end. Vicenzi said he feels Council should fund these requests. They are a small measure to try and combat this problem. Mac Cunningham said people going to the Institute ignore stop signs and speed limits. There has been a large increase in the number of vehicle trips to the Institute. The are deliveries outside of the specified delivery time. Drivers have no concept they are in a residential area. Robert Harth, M.A.A. said he is concerned about the areas of non-consensus. Harth said he would like some direction from Council rather than go to P & Z with items of significant non-consensus. Councilwoman Richards commended the group for bringing to Council items they have agreed on. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt the plan in concept; allocate $7000 from the contingency fund, have the city manager make sure the funds are available; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to approve the lighting through the electric fund subject to the city manager's review and meeting the concerns of the neighborhood; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Motion carried. Mayor Bennett asked if it would be appropriate to wait until after the P & Z meeting before Council schedules a work session on the rest of the issues. Harth told Council some of the issues will not be resolved at P & Z, like bus service in the west end. Mayor Bennett said there will be changes with these actions and suggested waiting until after the summer season to see what the outcome is. Council agreed. ORDINANCE #9, SERIES OF 1994 - Ordinance #1, 1990 Sunset Provision Review Councilwoman Waggaman moved to read Ordinance #9, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. 10 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 ORDINANCE #9 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AMENDING SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE 1, SERIES OF 1990, AND SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE 19, SERIES OF 1992, GOVERNING HOUSING REPLACE- MENT AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, BY ELIMINATING THE SUNSET/EXPIRATION AND REVIEW DATES AS CONTAINED THEREIN was read by the city clerk Diane Moore, planning director, recommended Council adopt this ordinance which eliminates the review dates contained in Ordinances 1 and 19. One of the recommendation of the Community Plan was to eliminate the sunset provisions and that Ordinance #1 be incor- porated into the code. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #9, Series of 1994, on first reading; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Paulson, yes; Richards, yes; Waggaman, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #19, SERIES OF 1994 - Juan Street AH PUD, Subdivision and GMQS Exemption Councilwoman Richards moved to read Ordinance #10, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #10 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY CO UNCIL GRANTING A MAP AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, SUBDIVISION, GMQS EXEMPTION AND VESTED RIGHTS STATUS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 6 AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS ON LOTS 3, 4, 5 AND 6 BLOCK 11 EAMES ADDITION, JUAN STREET, TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO was read by the city clerk Leslie Lamont, planning office, told Council this property was purchased by the housing authority in 1990. It is a 12,000 square foot parcel containing two homes, one of which is a historic structure. The proposal is to demolish the smaller structure and relocate the historic structure to the northwest corner, build 2 duplexes and a single family home. There will be 12 on-site parking spaces. The applicant requests rezoning to AH, consolid- ation of the 4 step review process, subdivision and PUD review, and GMQS exemption. HPC approved relocation of the historic structure. P & Z reviewed and approved 8040 greenline and special review for on-site parking and open space. P & Z recom mends consolidation of 11 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 the four-step process to a two step process, subdivision and PUD review and exemption from GMQS for the affordable housing. Ms. Lamont asked Council if they had any major issues with the project. Councilwoman Waggaman asked about the towers on the back of the project, were they adding to the expense of the project. Scott Smith, Gibson & Reno architects, said the HPC felt the spires and towers related to the old mining structure. The architects felt this element would give more character to the structures. Councilman Paulson said he would like to see more lawns and green space surrounding affordable housing structures. Dave Tolen, housing office, told Council he will have comments from the housing survey for Council at the second reading. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #10, Series of 1994, on first reading; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #12, SERIES OF 1994 - Code Amendment Minimum Lot Size in AH Zone Councilwoman Richards moved to read Ordinance #12, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #12 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, LAND USE REGULATIONS, BY AMENDING SECTION 24-5-206.2 TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX DWELLING UNITS TO 1,500 SQUARE FEET PER DWELLING UNIT ON PARCELS LESS THAN 27,000 SQUARE FEET IN THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ZONE DISTRICT was read by the city clerk Leslie Lamont, planning office, told Council the land use code for the AH zone district does not enable small homes and small lots in a detached configuration. Ms. Lamont noted the Community Plan and P & Z recommended small detached homes on small lots in character with the history of miner's cottages. This code amendment would reduce the minimum lot size from 3,000 to 1500 square feet only for projects on parcels with less than 27,000 square feet. Ms. Lamont said there is also the ability to apply a PUD to these projects. Alan Richman said the code drives appli cants to produce block- style projects. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #12, Series of 1994, on first reading; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. Roll call 12 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 vote; Councilmembers Waggaman, yes; Richards, yes; Paulson, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #11, SERIES OF 1994 - Golf Course Fee Increases Councilwoman Waggaman moved to read Ordinance #11, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #11 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, AMENDING SECTION 2-33 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE USER FEES AT THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE was read by the city clerk Steve Aitken, golf superintendent, said this increase will support improvements at the golf course outlined in the conceptual report by Richard Phelps. Aitken said the golf committee's philosophy is to keep the course inexpensive for the locals to play. The idea is to phase in a 10 percent increase over 10 years. A 20-punch pass allows one to pay 18 holes for $20. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #11, Series of 1994, on first reading; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Waggaman, yes; Richards, yes; Paulson, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adjourn at 9:05 p.m.; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. Kathryn S. Koch, City C lerk 13 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council March 28, 1994 CITIZEN COMMENTS 1 ................................ ............... COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1 ................................ ......... CONSENT CALENDAR 2 ................................ ............... ORDINANCE #4, SERIES OF 1994 - Billings Subdivision/PUD, GMQS Exemption 2 ................................ ................. ORDINANCE #7, SERIES OF 1994 - Appropriations 5 .................. ORDINANCE #8, SERIES OF 1994 - Amending Liquor License Authority 6 ................................ ................. APPEAL OF PLANNING DIRECTOR INTERPRETATION FOR POPPIE'S 6 ........ WEST END TRAFFIC STUDY 7 ................................ ......... ORDINANCE #9, SERIES OF 1994 - Ordinance #1, 1990 Sunset Provision Review 9 ................................ .......... ORDINANCE #19, SERIES OF 1994 - Juan Street AH PUD, Subdivi- sion and GMQS Exemption 10 ................................ ... ORDINANCE #12, SERIES OF 1994 - Code Amendment Minimum Lot Size in AH Zone 11 ................................ ........... ORDINANCE #11, SERIES OF 1994 - Golf Course Fee Increases 11 ...... 14