Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.council.19940926Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 Mayor Bennett called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. with Councilmember Paulson, Richards and Waggaman present. CITIZEN COMMENTS Ramona Markalunas, representing the Independence Pass Foundation and Environmental Research Group, thanked Council for their support of various projects on Independence Pass and invited Council to participate either October 1 or 2 on good roads days. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1. Amy Margerum, city manager, reminded Council the budget meeting on the asset management plan has been rescheduled to October 4th. The departmental goals and outcome measures will be done later. 2. Amy Margerum, city manager, requested money from the cont in- gency fund to pay the expenses for the design symposium. These expenses will be the room, travel costs and some minimal expenses. This should be no more than $10,000. Councilwoman Richards asked about taking this out of the planning office budget. Ms. Margerum said she has squeezed everything out of the planning office budget possible; these expenses were unanticipated. Councilwoman Richards moved to approve up to $10,000 from contin- gency funds for the design symposium; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, motion carried. 3. Councilwoman Richards moved to add Ordinance #57, Series of 1994, Purchase of Cozy Point Ranch, to the end of the agenda; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilwoman Richards moved to read Ordinances #55 and #56, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #55 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, FOR THE APPROVAL OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION FOR A DEED RESTRICTED DWELLING UNIT TO BE LOCATED AT 706 WEST MAIN STREET WITHIN THE KRABACHER OFFICE BUILDING (LOT Q AND 20' OF LOT R, BLOCK 18, TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO) 1 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 ORDINANCE #56 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF THE ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE TO WIT: SECTION 3-101 DEFINITIONS FOR FOOD MARKET, LOT AREA, KITCHEN, NET LIVABLE AREA, AND FLOOR AREA RATIO; SECTION 5-210(B) COMMERCIAL C-1 ZONE DISTRICT PERMITTED USES; SECTION 5-202(B) NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICT PERMITTED USES; SECTION 5-301(E) FRACTIONAL PARKING SPACES; SECTION 5-302(A) CHARACTERISTICS OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES; SECTION 5-510(A)(1) NET LIVAB LE AREA FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS; SECTION 6-202(B) APPLICATION MATERIALS; SECTION 6-205(E)(4)(d) PUBLIC NOTICE; SECTION 8-103(D)(1) GMQS MULTI-YEAR ALLOTMENTS; SECTION 8-104(A)(1)(c) HOUSING MITIGATION FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AND DUPLEXES; SE CTION 8-104(B)(1) GROWTH MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION were read by the city clerk Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt the consent calendar; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Councilwoman Richards said she has some concerns about the floor area ratios for accessory dwelling units. The community plan suggested these be made larger to accommodate families. The consent calendar is: a) Resolution #73, 1994 - Digger Dooger Contract b) Resolution #75, 1994 - Contract - Aspen Mtn. water tank drain c) Resolution #74, 1994 - Golf Course Pro-shop contract d) Ordinance #55, 1994 - Krabacher GMQS Exemption e) Ordinance #56, 1994 - Chapter 24 Land Use general code amendments Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Paulson, yes; Waggaman, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #44, SERIES OF 1994 - Appropriations 2 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 Rob Umbreit, budget director, told Council this has been amended since first reading to incorporate revenue and expense for a golf shed which was destroyed in a fire. This ordinance includes everything Council has reviewed since March. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Richards asked about adding the money just appropriat- ed for the design symposium. Steve Barwick, assistant city manager, said Council does not need to appropriate monies out of the contingency fund but just approve the use of them. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #44, series of 1994, as amended, on second reading; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #34, SERIES OF 1994 - Poppies Rezoning, GMQS and Vested Rights Mary Lackner, planning office, told Council this is a 6,000 square foot parcel at Hallam and 8th streets currently zoned R-6. This request is to rezone it to O, office. Ms. Lackner reminded Council the applicants came to Council for an planning director interpre- tation to add a residential dwelling unit. Council directed the applicant to request rezoning in order to accomplish the request. Rezoning eliminates the non-conforming status of a restaurant in R- 6 and makes it a conforming use in the Office district. Once the rezoning and landmark designation are complete, staff will prepare a GMQS exemption to add the residential dwelling to the existing building. Ms. Lackner said the conversion does allow an increase of square footage on the property. Currently there is 3204 square feet; the request is for 4210 square feet. The office zone allow more floor area than R-6. Ms. Lackner said the proposed residential dwelling does not have to be deed restricted. It was requested the applicant put an RO restriction in exchange for rezoning to O, office. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Richards noted this rezoning allows for greater density when Council is starting to look at floor area ratios throughout the town. Councilwoman Richards said she is willing to support this but has concerns about approving a free market unit attached to this structure. Sunny Vann, representing the appli- 3 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 cant, told Council the applicant feels his willingness to have this historically designated entitles him to this dwelling unit. The intent is to use this for restaurant employees. It is not a requirement for growth management exemption to deed restrict this unit. Councilwoman Richards said Council was supportive of this because of provision of on-site affordable housing for restaurant employ- ees. Councilwoman Richards said this request is to increase the square footage 1100 square feet for a free market unit at the same time the city is looking at whether structures should be smaller on their lots. Vann told Council this is subject to HPC approval and has gone through conceptual review. Councilwoman Waggaman said because this went through HPC, it is following neighborhood guidelines. The increase is not impactful. The size and location of the housing unit will encourage it to be used as employee housing, not free market. Vann pointed out with landmark designation, this structure would receive a bonus of 500 square feet. The total of the new unit would be 760 square feet. With this rezoning, the applicant could build a two bedroom 970 square feet unit. Vann said the maximum allowable floor area under R-6 zoning is 3240 square feet. The existing structure contains 2,980 square feet, which leaves 260 square feet for potential expansion. Vann pointed out adding 970 square feet goes to 3950 square feet on the parcel. The allowable FAR in office zone is 4500 square feet. Vann reminded Council this applicant does not need office zoning to expand the commercial size of the building. The applicant would like more square footage than is available in R-6 plus the historic bonus. Mayor Bennett pointed out this were originally requested to be a deed restricted unit and it is now a free market unit. Mayor Bennett said he would support if this were deed restricted. Ms. Lackner pointed out at first reading Councilwoman Richards asked why this were not deed restricted. Councilwoman Richards moved to table Ordinance #34, Series of 1994, until the first regular Council meeting after the design symposium to see where lot size and designs are headed; seconded by Mayor Bennett. Councilwoman Richards said the purpose of being larger for an affordable housing unit is valid; the purpose of being larger for a free market unit is not valid. Vann said they will impose a reasonable restriction on the FAR with some small flexibility to deal with changes. Councilwoman Richards withdrew her motion. 4 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #34, Series of 1994, rezoning for Poppie's with the understanding the applicant has offered to restrict the floor area ratio to no greater than 4,000 square feet required to build a free market unit in association with the restaurant and with historic designation; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #52, SERIES OF 1994 - Williams Ranch Councilwoman Waggaman moved to read Ordinance #52, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #52 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN GRANTING GENERAL REVIEW, SUBDIVISION, PUD, REZONING TO AH, GMQS EXEMPTION, ANNEXATION AND VESTED RIGHTS FOR THE WILLIAMS RANCH PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT 35 DEED RESTRICTED AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS AND 15 FREE MARKET LOTS ON A PARCEL LOCATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST 6TH P.M. was read by the city clerk Mary Lackner, planning office, told Council prior to second reading a number of issues, like fee waivers, need to be resolved. Staff is requesting a work session to review these issues. Ms. Lackner pointed out when Council originally saw this project it consisted of 54 units. The applicant has redesigned it to a total of 50 units; 15 free market lots and 35 deed restricted units. There is density reduction of square feet; a 12 percent reduction in square feet in affordable housing. The applicant has restricted the free market FAR to 80 percent of what is allowed in that zone. If the owner wants to go to the full FAR, this would require 8040 review by P & Z. This would allow an average house size of 3200 square feet. The access of the project was redesigned. There is only one lot getting access off Spruce street. There is emergency access on this street. The townhouses on the lower portion have been eliminated. The majority of the units access off Smuggler mountain road. Ms. Lacker said an open space buffer between the Salvation ditch and Centennial was requested. Ms. Lackner showed a half acre parcel that will be publicly dedicated as well as a trail easement through the parcel. Ms. Lackner told Council a traffic study for the area was done. 5 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 This shows a 5 to 10 percent increase in traffic volumes. The study shows this project will not create congestion at intersec- tions, and there is adequate road capacity to serve this project. Ms. Lackner told Council both P & Z and HPC have reviewed the project. P & Z granted special review for parking and open space and granted 8040 greenline review for the entire project. Ms. Lackner said Council has been looking at resident occupied deed restrictions. Ms. Lackner said the applicants have requested that half the units have no asset and income limitations; the other half have realistic asset and income limitations. Ms. Lackner reminded Council the land use code allows 14 free market units to be exempt in the AH zone district. None of these free market units have been used for 1994; however, this project requests 15 units. Council needs to address this one last unit. Ms. Lackner told Council the mine parcel, which is located in the county, is slated for one residential unit as a watchman's quarters. Ms. Lackner said the outstanding annexation issues should be resolved before final adoption of this ordinance. Tom Stevens, representing the applicant, told Council the concept of the project was tied to the Aspen Area Community Plan and to the known demands for affordable housing. The AACP said this would be a good site for small lot single families and duplexes. Stevens pointed out this project has been reduced by 4 units, 1 free market and 3 deed restricted. The 50 unit plan still meets the AH zone district requirements. Stevens said there is an overall 12 percent reduction in the FAR by eliminating unnecessary space. Stevens told Council the applicants will be developing lot 15 and will not go through 8040 greenline for a larger FAR. Stevens said the impact fees can be discussed at a work session on annexation. Stevens went over the model, showing how units were split up and were pulled away from the ditch. Stevens said not every unit could be place above the Salvation ditch. Fred Soyka said at conceptual, Council indicated all of the housing and parking was supposed to be above the Salvation Ditch as well as the open space being public. Soyka said it seems this project is asking a lot of favors from the community and city. Amy Brownstein said she feels this is too dense and will add car trips. The city should not continue to ghettoize the east end. Julie Forsay said there is no play area for children in this development. Vicki Brooks said private developers of employee housing should be encouraged. Kristin George said people hoping to get into this project have lived in the valley for years. Grafton Smith said he supports the project and that private enterprise can do a housing project better than a government. Greg Poschman said this 6 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 developer has bent over backwards in trying to do something good for the community. Poschman encouraged Council to work with the developer to get this project done. Kim Popish said she supports the project. This is private land, not open space for the residents of the area. Lorrie Winterman said in the name of affordable housing people take away the concept of open space and parks. Mayor Bennett said there will be a full public hearing at second reading. Councilwoman Richards said she cannot support this project without sidewalks in order to further pedestrianism. Wright said P & Z's recommendations was to put a 5 foot hard surface on one side with an easement to put a sidewalk on the other side if it is needed. Councilwoman Richards said she can support that compromise. Councilwoman Richards said she is very concerned about the lack of guidelines requested for half of the resident occupied units. Councilwoman Richards said if half the RO units are not restricted in income and asset guidelines, this project does to seem to meet the AH guidelines. Councilwoman Richards said Council gave direction all units should be above the Salvation Ditch, and she will not support this design. Councilwoman Richards said she is concerned about the voluntary 80 percent of the FAR for the free market units and review above that. Stevens said this is based upon the existing FAR. Councilwoman Richards said she would like to see the size of the free market housing made smaller. Councilwoman Richards said she would like to see a definitive plan for the rest of the acreage. Stevens said that has been done and he will provide Council a copy. Councilman Paulson said he too is concerned about the RO issue as well as the density of the project. This project adds a lot of impact to the city. Councilman Paulson said it does not seem like the developer is paying his fair share of these impacts. Council- man Paulson said he would rather the road going through this project be a public road. John Worcester, city attorney, said because of the EPA order, Council may not want the roads dedicated to the city. Councilman Paulson said the open space between Centennial and Williams Ranch should be an area both places could use. Wright said the goal is to impose some responsibility on the people who are using the open space. Councilman Paulson said he does not want to see houses below the Salvation ditch. Councilwoman Waggaman said some issues will be addressed in the work session between first and second reading. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would like to see the roads as narrow as possible. The open space needs to be accessed by everyone. 7 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 Councilwoman Waggaman said she would like to see everything possible done to soften the asphalt and concrete in the develop- ment. Councilwoman Waggaman said there is a housing need for managers and business owners; these seem to fit into the RO category. Councilwoman Waggaman said she is concerned with the hillside cut and the Molly Gibson park. Mayor Bennett said the impact fees can be addressed in a work session. Mayor Bennett said he does not have a problem with the RO concept, it seems to be in order to qualify more purchasers for the units. Mayor Bennett said there should be no gates to the project. Mayor Bennett said he would like to see the width of streets right-of-way lessened to 40 feet and wider only on arterial streets. Mayor Bennett said he wants the open space look and feel like a public park amenity for the neighbors. Mayor Bennett suggested the city put some affordable housing funds into this project in order to reduce the density. This would create less density and more open space. Councilwoman Richards said she would not support using housing money to buy off a free market lot. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #52, Series of 1994, on first reading; seconded by Mayor Bennett. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. REQUEST FOR FUNDS - Aspen Theatre in the Park A representative of Aspen Theatre told Council since the tent was put up in 1992, the Aspen Theatre has increased attendance by 40 percent. Aspen Theatre is suffering from success; their programs cost more. It has also been more difficult to raise money as more non-profit organizations are competing for money. There was a short fall of $27,000; grants were down $9,000 and individual donations were down $3,000. The Aspen Theatre needs to raise $40,000 by September 15th; they have pledges of $25,000. There was a benefit that raised $11,000 and Aspen Theatre has requested $4,000 from the city in order to reach their goal of $40,000. Mayor Bennett said he would support this because of the emergency nature, the one-time request, and the fact the Theatre has raised 90 percent of what they needed. Councilwoman Richards moved to approve a request of $4,000 out of contingency for the Aspen Theatre in the Park; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #54, SERIES OF 1994 - Chapter 24 Land Use GMQS Code Amendments Councilman Paulson moved to read Ordinance #54, Series of 1994; 8 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #54 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING AMEND- MENTS TO SECTION 8 OF THE ASPEN LAND USE CODE IN ORDER TO INSURE THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM FOR THE ASPEN METRO AREA IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS OF THE ASPEN AREA COMMUNITY PLAN was read by the city clerk Cindy Houben, planning office, reminded Council there have been several work sessions on these amendments. One issue Council wanted staff to address is the number of lodge units available in the GMQS for the next 23 years. Ms. Houben recommended reducing the number of lodge units available to 250 to 300 units. There is a potential build out of lodge units of 896, 650 of these at the base of Highlands. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #54, Series of 1994, on first reading with the modification of 250 lodge units; seconded by Councilman Paulson. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. Council said they would defer adoption of Resolution #76, Series of 1994 until second reading of Ordinance #54. ORDINANCE #57, SERIES OF 1994 - Purchase of Cozy Point Ranch Councilwoman Waggaman moved to read Ordinance #57, Series of 1994; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #57 (Series of 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING THE ACQUISITION BY THE CITY OF ASPEN FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, RECREATION, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING PURPOSES, OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE "COZY POINT RANCH" AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN "FARM AND RANCH CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE", APPENDED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "1", BY PURCHASING AN ASSIGNMENT FROM ROARING FORK COMMUNITY PARTNERS, L.L.C. UPON TERMS AND CONDITIONS GOVERNING THE ACQUISITION, MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF "COZY POINT RANCH" AS SET FORTH IN THAT CERTAIN "ASSIGNMENT AND PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT", APPENDED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "2", BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN AND ROARING FORK 9 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 COMMUNITY PARTNERS, L.L.C; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN SAID ASSIGNMENT AND PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT AND SUCH OTHER DOCUMENTS AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO CONSUM MATE THE LAND ACQUISITION; AND, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4.11 OF THE ASPEN CITY CHARTER was read by the city clerk Marty Pickett, Tim McFlynn, Connie Harvey and Fritz Benedict comprise the Roaring Fork Community Partners who have the Cozy Point Ranch under contract. Ms. Pickett told Council the partners have looked at title, survey, water rights, etc. before they talked to any other entity. Ms. Pickett said they have met with city and county staff, County Commissioners individually, housing authority, Town of Snowmass Village, Woody Creek caucus executive committee, and department of highways. A map showing the open space, equestrian center, barn, stalls, residences, etc. was presented to Council. Tim McFlynn said the proposal was to have a public/private partnership to preserve the entire 2 miles along highway 82 for public purposes, like open space, recreation and affordable housing. The initial idea was that the private group would contribute $1 million to the purchase price of $3.2 million. Staff has suggested an adequate amount of time to analyze the feasibility of this purchase. RFCP will assign their contract at their contract price to the city. McFlynn said the city and RFCP will negotiate for 90 days in an attempt to come up with a partner ship agreement and to see what other entities may be interested in participating. During that time the RFCP for a year with a one year option will take the responsibility and expense of managing the ranching operation. McFlynn said in the Agreement, during the 90 days if RFCP and the city can reach agreement, RFCP will buy back in for 50 percent of the city's investment with private capital. If Agreement cannot be reached, the city would pay a fee of $50,000 plus out of pocket expenses up to $25,000 for a total of $75,000 if RFCP is out of the picture. McFlynn said the principles are that the whole property be dedicated to public use, the south end remain open space to include continued ranching and irrigated use, new hiking and Nordic trails, the middle of the property continue in the equestrian uses, and the possibility of affordable housing. Councilwoman Richards moved to suspend the rules and continue the meeting to 9:30 p.m.; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. McFlynn said this proposal does not approve any uses. There will 10 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 be a planning process, public input and public hearings. John Worcester, city attorney, told Council there are some outstanding issues in the Agreement. Worcester said the one year renewal for the management of the ranch will be at the option of the city, rather than giving RFCP a two year contract. Amy Margerum, city manager, said this time period will allow RFCP to get tenants and to board horses. Worcester suggested adding "at the discretion of the city" to Sections 1.8 and 4.1. Councilwoman Richards asked if there is a provision in the Agreement for the instance if the city sells the Ranch. Council- woman Richards asked if the partnership is a merchantable item. Worcester said the partnership does have value but it cannot be assigned. Worcester suggested in Section 1.9 that the city and RFCP further agree that if a partnership agreement is approved, RFCP shall participate and assist the city in the selection of planning and design consultants. McFlynn said the forest service has been planning on a visitor facility including their horses, and has met with RFCP and indicated a preferred location on this property before the turn off to Snowmass. McFlynn said as a way to induce private capital in this venture there has to be a return for investors. The thought is to have 15 acres to sell. Mayor Bennett said Council has already turned down the idea of 15 acres for sale. Councilwom an Richards said she is concerned about this 15 acres deal and the forest service selling their parcel in town. Worcester said he would like to delete "reserved as its compensa tion". Councilwoman Richards moved to suspend the rules and extend the meeting to 9:50 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, motion carried. Worcester noted the property seems to have good water rights. They own 52 percent of all water rights associated with the ranch, which is 103 acres feet of water plus some rights associated with the north property which is 100 percent of 24 acre feet of water for irrigation purposes. Worcester said there would be some difficulty using the water rights in the winter because they have been designated for irrigation purposes. It would take a water court to change the uses of the water. Jim Crowley, president of the Bruch Creek Metro District, told Council he is concerned about the road which currently belongs to the ranch. Crowley said the homeowners would like to gain physical ownership of the road. Crowley said another concern of any development on this property is the long term impact on the infrastructure of the entire area. Mayor Bennett agreed this property is the front door to both Aspen and Snowmass. It is a 11 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 critical piece of open space. Councilwoman Waggaman said she does not want the city to get involved in this project alone; however, the city can move more quickly than some other entities. Councilwoman Richards pointed out the Aspen Area Community Plan looked at the entire upper valley as the metro area. Councilwoman Richards said the city helped with the purchase of North Star ranch east of town. Howard Hardy, president of Brush Creek Homeowners Association, said the city seems to be jumping without looking at sewer, water, forest service, infrastructure, etc. Mayor Bennett said this agreement will allow the city to take 90 days to decide whether to buy the property. There is a very short deadline on the contract to purchase. It is crucial open space, view corridors, etc. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #57, Series of 1994, on first reading as an emergency ordinance amending the agreement as discussed at the meeting; seconded by Councilman Paulson. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Richards, yes; Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. Councilwoman Richards moved to adjourn at 10 p.m.; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk 12 Regular Meeting Aspen City Council September 26, 1994 CITIZEN COMMENTS 1 ................................ ............... COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1 ................................ ......... CONSENT CALENDAR 1 ................................ ............... a) Resolution #73, 1994 - Digger Dooger Contract b) Resolution #75, 1994 - Contract - Aspen Mtn. water tank drain c) Resolution #74, 1994 - Golf Course Pro-shop contract d) Ordi nance #55, 1994 - Krabacher GMQS Exemption e) Ordinance #56, 1994 - Chapter 24 Land Use general code amendments ORDINANCE #44, SERIES OF 1994 - Appropriations 2 ................. ORDINANCE #34, SERIES OF 1994 - Poppies Rezoning, GMQS and Vested Rights 3 ................................ ............. ORDINANCE #52, SERIES OF 1994 - Williams Ranch 5 ................. REQUEST FOR FUNDS - Aspen Theatre in the Park 8 .................. ORDINANCE #54, SERIES OF 1994 - Chapter 24 Land Use GMQS Code Amendments 8 ................................ ................ ORDINANCE #57, SERIES OF 1994 - Purchase of Cozy Point Ranch 9 ... 13