Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.council.19960722Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 Mayor Bennett called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. with Councilmembers Richards, Waggaman, and Paulson present. PROCLAMATION - Katsuyama Mayor Bennett and Council presented a proclamation to 5 exchange students and 2 teachers from Katsuyama, Japan, who are visiting the Aspen schools. CITIZEN COMMENTS 1. Bob Lewis thanked Council for all their support on the Independence Pass Foundation. Lewis told Council they have having a meeting to plan to build a hiking trail on the old stage road from Aspen to the town of Independence. About 40 percent of the road is still in good shape. Lewis invited any interested members to the meeting. COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1. Mayor Bennett thanked the citizens of the transportation task force who made their findings public last week. All but 1 member agreed with the recommendation to do rail immediately without phasing. 2. Councilwoman Richards announced a transportation open house Thursday, July 25 at the Cafe Metropolitan from 6 to 9 p.m. Elected officials will have maps of the proposed highway alternatives. 3. Councilman Paulson said the new trail through the art park seems out of scale, too much concrete for a bike trail. City Manager Margerum said she will contact the parks department and report back. 4. Coun cilwoman Richards moved to add to the consent calendar a request from the Red Brick Arts and Recreation Center for an irrigation system to come from the capital reserve fund; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. 1 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 5. City Manager Margerum pointed out on the consent calendar the Lone Pine Buy out short term loans have increased from $300,000 to $450,000. Ms. Margerum suggested Council approve the consent calendar at $300,000 and the applicants can come back on the next agenda if they need more. Dave Tolen, housing director, requested these be put on the agenda and discussed due to time commitments. Council agreed to discuss it at the end of the agenda. 6. City Manager Margerum told Council the small lodge text amendment will not have first reading until August 12 as it has not finished at P & Z. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Paulson moved to read Ordinance #28 and 30, Series of 1996; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #28 Series of 1996 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 1995 EDITION OF THE “MODEL TRAFFIC CODE FOR COLORADO MUNICIPALITIES”, REPEALING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS IN CONFLICT THEREWITH, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF ORDINANCE #30 Series of 1996 AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL WAIVING PARK DEDICATION FEES FOR 935 E. HYMAN AVENUE, LOT 1 KENTCO LOT SPLIT, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN were read by the city clerk Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt the consent calendar as amended; seconded by Councilman Paulson. The consent calendar is: 2 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 · Minutes - May 28, June 24, 1996 · Ordinance #28, Series of 1996 - Adoption of the 1995 Model Traffic Code · Resolution #41, Series of 1996 - Extension of GMQS Cutoff Date · Ordinance #30, Series of 1996 - 935 E. Hyman Waiver of Park Dedication Fee · Red Brick Capital Funding Request $4168 Roll call vote; Councilmembers Paulson, yes; Waggaman, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #20, SERIES OF 1996 - Aspen Club SPA Amendment Dave Michaelson, Commu nity Development department, reminded Council the Aspen Club is seeking approval to modify the access and parking area to the Club. The original PUD agreement restricted use of Ute Avenue parking lot to service and deliveries. Over time the lot has been used for additional parking. After a public hearing on July 8, Council tabled the request to get more information. Michaelson said the original proposal was for 138 spaces on Ute Avenue, which was revised to 20 spaces on Crystal Lake and 80 spaces on Ute Avenue for a total of 100 spaces. This proposal is for 20 spaces off Crystal Lake, 10 spaces reserved for future use and 56 spaces off Ute Avenue, 47 member spaces and 9 therapy spaces. Michaelson presented copies of these parking proposals. Michaelson told Council there is revised traffic impact; the numbers came from Leigh, Scott Cleary traffic report. Michaelson told Council the range of each parking space is 2.4 to 2.5 trips per day per space. Based on that, the additional 9 spaces on Ute would generate 33 trips. Michaelson said the therapy room is only open 30 hour per week as opposed to 100 hours per week for the entire club. With these, staff feels there would be a less than 1 percent increase on Cooper and less than 5 percent on upper Ute. Council requested the applicant submit a traffic management plan to address the proposed shuttle service. This service would be point to point from the Aspen Club Lodge to the Aspen Club and would operate on Ute avenue and on demand with 30 minute headways. Members and guests will be given materials about this service; there will be a sign at the front desk. The applicant is proposing to operate this for 2 3 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 years with Council review after 1 year. There have been preliminary discussions with RFTA to expand the dial-a-ride service to augment the shuttle service. Council also requested a site plan for the north lot, which has been submitted. The applicant is negotiating with adjacent property owners. The plan is to deed restrict this as open space and provide 20 permanent parking spaces with room for 10 expansion spaces. The access has been slightly modified. The applicant has retained the right to develop one single family house on that lot which has to do with the initial GMQS allocation granted with the approval. There is enough lot area to make 2 lots; however, the applicant would have to go through GMQS to get 2 units. Michaelson noted staff has done several traffic calming measures on Ute Ave; painted crosswalks accessing the Ute trail, speed bumps, speed limit signs and a sign that this is not a through street. Staff feels the 47 and 9 spaces on Ute , 20 spaces on Crystal Lake and a shuttle van would represent a minimal impact on Ute avenue. Michaelson said the average vehicle count for both lots is 53, about 30 on the south and 20 on the north. Alan Richman, representing the applicant, said the shuttle is proposed to go along Ute avenue; however, this can be moved to Highway 82. The applicants feel the shuttle will be more likely to succeed along Ute avenue. Richman said this route makes more sense if the shuttle were to have persons who need the therapy entrance. Also the customers inside the Club need to know where the shuttle pick up is. Richman told Council information about the shuttle will be mailed to people with spa reservations as well as members and employees. There will be a sign at the front desk. Councilwoman Richards said she is not satisfied with the shuttle service having only one pick up point at the Aspen Club Lodge. Councilwoman Richards said she feels this needs consistency to work as a shuttle program. Richman showed drawings of the parking lot on the Crystal Lake side with 20 spaces and 10 for future use. Richman said these spaces are as close to the Club entrance as possible. Richman showed the parking plan for the rear lot with 45 members spaces, 2 handicap spaces and 9 therapy spaces. Richman pointed out service has always been off of Ute Avenue and was identified as such in the PUD agreement. The outdoor lighting will be unobtrusive and low to the ground. Richman said the applicant discussed a fee for parking and felt that would be too big of a financial imposition on some Club members. Richman said the Club has always tried to remain open to all different types of members and economic classes. 4 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 Councilwoman Richards asked if there will be an increase of FAR. Butera said they have 4900 square feet for additional floor area within the existing footprint. Butera said there will be a conference room of 1300 square feet and an improved kitchen of 800 square feet. Councilwoman Richards said she feels there have to be 30 spaces on the Crystal Lake side not including expansion. Councilwoman Richards said her intent is not to change the emphasis of the club from the front door to the back door. Mayor Bennett said he would rather see the intersection of Ute and Original turned into a 4 way stop than removing 4 more parking spaces as has been suggested by staff. Mayor Bennett said every parking space that is taken off the street just pushes more cars into the neighborhood. Mayor Bennett said if traffic demand measures are needed in the future, he would like to see HOV only parking off Ute Avenue. Mayor Bennett said there should be “no parking” signs put in the delivery area immediately. Mayor Bennett said he, too, wants to see more parking retained on the Crystal Lake side. This plan will not work if the lot on the north side is not big enough for the 1996 demand, let alone the future. Mayor Bennett said the applicant has stated the main reason for this plan is to enable them to reinvest in the Aspen Club and bring it up to the ‘90’s. Mayor Bennett said Council should make clear this is the absolute final change to the parking arrangement, and they will not approve another 20 cars on the Ute Avenue side. Councilwoman Waggaman said since residents use health clubs a lot, it is important for traffic management in general to keep a health club on the east side of town. Councilwoman Waggaman said the applicant needs to be able to run this Club as a business and to keep his clients happy. Councilwoman Waggaman said there should be a consideration for the car lights at night reflecting in neighbors’ windows. Councilwoman Waggaman suggested the bike path along Ute Avenue should be extended another 200 feet into the Aspen Club. Councilwoman Richards said although market forces have changed in the last 15 years, this is also an approval for a change in use of the Club to allow more outside use of the Club. Council is also being asked to approve a decrease in overall parking spaces. Councilwoman Richards said the north side should have at least 30 parking spaces with provision for 10 spaces in the future. Councilwoman Richards said the shuttle and all lodge vans should use the Crystal Lake side, unless for a therapy patient. 5 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 Councilman Paulson agreed the north lot should be a minimum of 30 parking spaces with expansion possibilities. Councilman Paulson said the applicant should be able to determine where the shuttle should go in order to make it work. Councilwoman Waggaman agreed the shuttle and the parking should be left up to the applicant in order to design it to make it work. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #20, Series of 1996, with amendments to allow 30 parking spaces on the north Crystal Lot side with expansion potential for 10 future spaces; that the shuttle go to the Crystal Lake side initially and that will be part of the 1 year review and it can be changed should that prove to be unsuccessful after 1 year operation; that the shuttle run on a point to point service with 1 cross town pick up location to be determined away from the current club; that the 2 years of run begin to be tracked as the elimination of the parking spaces occur and as the new construction is complete and those facilities come on line; that the primary drop off for the hotel service to the spa be on the Crystal Lake side, open to review; seconded by Mayor Bennett. Councilwoman Waggaman said she cannot support the restrictions on the shuttle; the shuttle should work and the applicant should be free and flexible in making it work. Councilwoman Waggaman said she would go for maximum 30 spaces on the north side. Councilwoman Richards said she feels there is a need for 30 spaces on the north side at this time to accommodate people using the Highway 82 entrance. Councilwoman Richards said she does not want people to find this parking lot full and circle around to Ute avenue. Councilwoman Richards said the decreasing number of cars has been due to declining club membership. The intention of this application is to have the club membership come back up with these improvements. Cutting back to 20 spaces may be cutting it too many. Mayor Bennett said there may be flexibility on the shuttle but once the land for the parking lot is sold, there is no flexibility. Councilwoman Richards amended the motion related to the shuttle service to allow the driver to deviate should there be someone who requires rehabilitative services because of handicap or extreme senior disability and that the drop off point be an experiment with the primary focus on the Crystal Lake lot the first 6 months and the Ute side the second 6 months so that when it is reviewed, its effectiveness can be determined; seconded by Mayor Bennett. City Attorney Worcester noted that condition #10 may cover Council’s concerns and when they judge the effectiveness of the shuttle program, the applicant will have 6 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 addressed Council’s concerns, and what they are looking for. Mayor Bennett suggested a statement that Council expects a bona fide experiment on both routes with the numbers and results to be reported to Council. Councilwoman Richards withdrew her first amendment. Councilwoman Richards amended the shuttle portion of the amendment to include that the Council expects a bona fide, legitimate experiment on both shuttle routes with the results to be reported to Council. City Manager Margerum cautioned Council about judging the effectiveness of a shuttle service in 6 months. Changing people’s habits take longer than 6 months. Both the Galena street shuttle and the parking garage have improved their use over several years. Councilwoman Richards moved to amend condition #10 to add “which shall be approved upon sole discretion of the City Council” to replace the amendment about the route of the shuttle and point to point service; Butera said after months of meetings with the staff, they came up with 20 parking spaces for good reasons. At the last Council meeting, it was agreed to stretch it to 20 plus expansion possibility of 10 more. Butera said 40 spaces will not work in his plans. Richman said non-members or users of the Club will not be able to park in the lots; there will be a shuttle service. Councilwoman Richards stated the Council is being asked to approved an overall reduction in parking while approving 4900 new square feet within the Club. Councilwoman Richards said she does not want the parking all pushed to the back; the parking lots should be of equal dynamics. Butera said the spa is not expected to draw more than 30 people a day. Butera said he is replacing a kitchen, moving 2 offices and adding a conference room. The 4900 square feet is not new space. Councilwoman Richards withdrew her motion; Mayor Bennett withdrew his second. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to adopt Ordinance #20, Series of 1996, with conditions in the Ordinance plus the addition Section 2 paragraph #10 add to the final sentence “which shall be approved upon the sole discretion of the City Council”, with the requirement of a minimum of 30 parking spaces available in the Highway 82 parking lot; signage in the parking lots and at the entrance to the Club and at the front desk will be as shown in the Ordinance but also emphasize there will be a shuttle and where it will be and that parking in the Ute avenue lot is 7 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 primarily for therapy, handicap, senior citizens, HOV. Motion DIES for lack of a second. Councilwoman Richards moved to adopt Ordinance #20, Series of 1996, on second reading; with the addition of language to section #10 “which shall be approved upon the sole discretion of the City Council”, 30 spaces from day 1 with space provided and reserved for 5 additional overflow spots as they may be needed and that the shuttle shall service at least 1 cross-town location further removed from the Aspen Club Lodge location and that the signage emphasize the use of the back lot for seniors, HOV, people with children, and that signage exist in the lot as well as the front desk; seconded by Councilman Paulson. Mayor Bennett said he would also like the motion to include no parking signs in the delivery area on the south sign and members only signs and enforcement effort in the Crystal Lake lot. Councilwoman Richards amended the motion to include the above; seconded by Councilman Paulson. Councilwoman Waggaman said she feels some of these decisions are up to the application to make the business venture success. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Paulson, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes; Waggaman, no. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #23, SERIES OF 1996 - Water Treatment Plant and Affordable Housing Final SPA Dave Michaelson, community development department, told Council this proposal for renovation of the water treatment plant also includes 22 affordable housing units, renovation of one existing unit, and several improvements for the water treatment plant itself. Michaelson told Council P & Z has reviewed this and has granted conditional use for the affordable housing, special review for parking, open space and dimensional requirements for an AH development, and 8040 greenline review. Michaelson told Council this project is compatible with the uses in the immediate vicinity in terms of density, height, bulk and architecture. Michaelson said there are sufficient public facilities and road for the development. The issues of grade on Doolittle have been addressed. There are no geologic hazards to preclude development. There is a soil report included in staff referrals. 8 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 Michaelson said the project employs land use planning techniques that preserve view planes and the oak scrub on the top of the slope. The structures have been pushed back to limit visibility from other areas. Michaelson pointed out the AACP encourages special districts and non-profit groups provide housing for their employees. This project is the city providing housing for emergency response and essential staff members. Michaelson told Council the cost of upgrading Doolittle Drive will be incorporated in the cost of the houses. Michaelson said an issue of this project is its impact on lower Maroon Creek and the intersection with Highway 82. Michaelson said the applicant will be required to enter into a subdivision agreement, a landscape guarantee and public facilities guarantee. Michaelson included conditions of approval from P & Z. Staff and P & Z recommend approval of this project with 26 conditions. Conditions unique to this project are to sign Doolittle Drive 20 mph; the proposed pedestrian loop on the east side of Doolittle shall be approved by the fire marshal; the building envelopes are to be kept out of the existing oak scrub; street light fixture and locations are to be approved by the community development department; cost estimates of all improvements to be approved by the city engineer; the trail alignment be staked and approved by the community development department; include the adjacent neighborhoods in planning the proposed park; a park development impact fee will be waived in exchange for the applicant designing and constructing the park. Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. King Woodward asked how many parking spaces on site. Michaelson said 35 parking spaces are provided plus each single family residence includes a 2 car garage plus apron. Woodward said the Maroon/Castle caucus is concerned about the entire area. It has been stated that there should be no commercial development until the intersection is taken care of. Woodward said the Moore and Highland projects are willing to contribute money to alleviate some of the problems at the intersection. Woodward said the city should come up with more than $5,000 towards this intersection. Councilwoman Richards said she thought the city proposed to include the same proportional share towards the intersection as everyone else. Michaelson said a condition from the last hearing was the applicant confirm to the satisfaction of the city and county engineers the proposed road impact mitigation is consistent with the relative impact of the project on that intersection. Jay Hammond said the rationale is that the intersection is funded by exactions from the Moore and Highlands 9 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 projects. The concern for this project focused on Castle Creek from the hospital entry to the intersection. Hammond said he looked at traffic generation from the project based on housing authority figures for comparable projects, which is 4 cars trips per day. This project is close to a bus stop and is also proposing a shuttle service. Hammond said at 88 trips per day for the project, this was compared to the build out on Castle Creek and then offered a percentage of the improvements for lower castle creek. Hammond said they took into consideration that this is a completely affordable housing project. Andy Hanson, Twin Ridge resident, said he feels all the projects in this area, not just Moore and Hines projects, should contribute something to the intersection with Highway 82. Amy Margerum, city manager, said the policy should be how the county approached the Moore and Hines projects; were these a pro rata share to be paid back by other developers in the area for the cost of the intersection. Councilwoman Richards said the Moore project water agreement stated that if money is coming from CDOT for the intersection, the Moore money would go to other parts of transportation alternatives. Councilmembers Richards and Waggaman agreed the city should pay their share. Councilwoman Richards said she wants to make sure that Castle Creek road is improved, too. Stan Clauson, community development director, told Council the city does not have a policy on transportation mitigation. When the city reviews a major development, they attempt to calculate what the impact of the development is relative to background traffic. Clauson pointed out the impact of this project relative to background at Highway 82 is very small and the mitigation would be less than $5,000. The impact to Castle Creek is somewhat larger and the impact to Doolittle Drive is even larger. Clauson said staff felt by putting money toward an area that hasn’t had any mitigations would give the most bang for the buck in terms of improvements and also be equitable. Ms. Margerum suggested the budget for this project include a line item for the Highway 82 intersection whether it is spent or not. If it is added to the housing project, it would make the units unfeasible to purchase for employees. Bob Daniel, Maroon/Castle Creek Caucus, told Council the traffic is split 50/50 between Castle and Maroon Creek roads. Daniel said a lot of improvements are being proposed for the intersection and a larger contribution would leverage the dollars further. Councilwoman Richards said it is difficult to go back to existing homeowners who are currently part of the traffic problem and have them pay their share. 10 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 Councilwoman Richards suggested a break out showing the incremental impacts on Castle Creek and on the intersection and Council will come up with what is fair. This will be brought back to Council. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Waggaman asked about the fence around the water treatment plant. Phil Overeynder, water department, told Council one reason for the fence is that animal intrusion could cause contamination of the water. There is also a concern for security of the plant. There are also facilities that staff does not want kids getting on to play. Mayor Bennett suggested adding a small meeting room to the addition at the water plant. Councilman Paulson moved to adopt Ordinance #23, Series of 1996, on second reading subject to the successful resolution of the traffic mitigation coming back to Council; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. Roll call vote; Councilmembers, Richards, yes; Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #24, SERIES OF 1996 - Water Service Agreement Lots 1 & 2 Golf Course Phil Overeynder, water department, told Council this subdivision is out of the city limits and was approved by the county in 1986. This is now being developed as two single family residences adjacent to the Moore open space. The subdivision improvements agreement stated they are to provide for water through the city’s water system. No water service application was made until 1996. Overeynder told Council the potable water service is available. This could potentially improve water service delivery with a loop into the Tennis Court subdivision in the future. Overeynder said the recommendation from the planning department is that this project is not inconsistent with the AACP because it is already developed. Overeynder told Council the county required landscaping of the berm fronting highway 82. Overeynder said staff felt this requirement would be a drain on the municipal water system and raw water should be used for irrigation demands. Overeynder recommended renovating an existing well on the property and use that for landscaping and require the owners to dedicate these water rights to the county. 11 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 Mayor Bennett opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Bennett closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Richards asked if Council can approve this subject to the increases in water tap fee ands rates. Mayor Bennett asked if this agreement can specify that this landscaping be xeriscape, requiring minimal watering. Overeynder said the agreement could require that and could also require a drip system. John Worcester, city attorney, suggested amending the ordinance subject to the provision that the water service agreement be amended in paragraph 14 to require that whatever landscape is provided on this berm is a xeriscape design, native vegetation and existing vegetation such plan to be approved by the city of Aspen Parks Department. Worcester also suggested the amendment that the tap fees would be under the prevailing fees or new tap fees adopted within the next year. Councilman Paulson moved to adopt Ordinance #24, Series of 1996, on second reading with the above amendments; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Waggaman, yes; Paulson, yes; Richards, yes; Mayor Bennett, yes. Motion carried. Councilwoman Richards moved to suspend the rules and extend the meeting to 9:15 p.m.; seconded by Councilwoman Waggaman. All in favor, motion carried. RESOLUTION #42, SERIES OF 1996 - Lone Pine Lease Buyout Dave Tolen, housing authority, told Council staff has been working to put together these bridge loans. The primary lenders require all the units to close at the same time and do not give very much flexibility. Tolen said 17 of 21 purchasers have commitments and are ready to close. These commitments expire very quickly. At least 7 buyers need bridge loans from a few months up to 2 years. This resolution authorizes the city to advance up to $300,000. There are 4 buyers not ready to close and that is why the request has gone from $300,000 to $450,000. Tolen told Council the balance in the housing day care fund is over $1 million. Tolen said these loans will be up to 3 years. Tolen said staff is asking for the flexibility in the next 2 weeks to put these deals together to enable Lone Pine residents to purchase the land underneath their units. Tolen told Council he would prefer to hold on to the land until this is all taken care of; however, the Freddie Mac guidelines will not allow this. 12 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 Jody Edwards, representing the homeowners, explained this has been a very complicated issue working with the homeowners, their primary mortgagees, Freddie Mac, and the potential lender to purchase the land. Amy Margerum, city manager, said this needs to be reviewed by the finance department and city attorney. Councilwoman Richards said she would like these structured to make sure there are as few of these loans out for as short a time as possible. Councilwoman Richards moved to approve Resolution #42, Series of 1996, with the subsidy amount of $525,000 with the loan amount at 8.875 interest with a 3 year balloon not to exceed $450,000 out of the child care trust fund not to exceed 3 years; seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, with the exception of Councilwoman Waggaman. Motion carried. Councilwoman Waggaman moved to continue the meeting to 8:30 a.m. at July 25; seconded by Councilwoman Richards. All in favor, motion carried. Council left Chambers at 9:30. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk 13 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting July 22, 1996 PROCLAMATION - Katsuyama ................................ ................................ ............. 1 CITIZEN COMMENTS ................................ ................................ .......................... 1 COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS ................................ ................................ ....... 1 CONSENT CALENDAR ................................ ................................ ........................ 2 Minutes - May 28, June 24, 1996 ................................ ................................ ........ 3 Ordinance #28, Series of 1996 - Adoption of the 1995 Model Traffic Code ......... 3 Resolution #41, Series of 1996 - Extension of GMQS Cutoff Date ...................... 3 Ordinance #30, Series of 1996 - 935 E. Hyman Waiver of Park Dedication Fee .. 3 Red Brick Capital Funding Request $4168 ................................ .......................... 3 ORDINANCE #20, SERIES OF 1996 - Aspen Club SPA Amendment ................... 3 ORDINANCE #23, SERIES OF 1996 - Water Treatment Plant and Affordable Housing Final SPA ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 8 ORDINANCE #24, SERIES OF 1996 - Water Service Agreement Lots 1 & 2 Golf Course ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 11 RESOLUTION #42, SERIES OF 1996 - Lone Pine Lease Buyout ........................ 12 14