Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.PU.11 Meadows Rd.0019.2016.ASLU%gk .A.r PATH: G/DRIVE / MASTER FILES/ADMINISTRATIVE/ADMIN/LANDUSE CASE DOCS Ak THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0019.2016.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 122 39 001 + 2735 122 31800 PROJECT ADDRESS 11-111 MEADOWS ROAD PLANNER HILLARY SEMINICK CASE DESCRIPTION PLANNED DEV AMENDMENT REPRESENTATIVE JOHN SARPA DATE OF FINAL ACTION 02.22.2017 CLOSED BY AVALON GUARINO 02.22.2017 `Rra1 ►U 1 d735- Wlff-P2-J9dlid73fW-1M0o File. Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help +✓ . 1 �x t:" >J - �,, yy '?, ,_�. ..:. liv lump 1 .?/ . �i, T4 . ti x _ Mam{Custom FieldsRouhng Status_!Fee SumnarpAchons ERoutmg History Permit type !® IAspen Land Use Permit # 0019 2016.ASLU - - Address ,11 -111 MEADOWS RD Apt/Suite c City ASPEN State DO Zip 81611 _. _-- Permit Information I' Master permit _. Routing queue I aslul5 Applied 03/0972016 - ? i Project Status ;pending Approved _ Description Amendent to Aspen Meadows SPA re: Trustee Houses Issued Closed/Final Submitted John Sarpa 379-2592 Dock Running Days 0 Eapies 031002017 Submitted via O wrier Last name 'S HOA TRUSTEE HOUSES First name '':501 E HYMAN -- ------' --__ _..------ --' 201 Phone (970J3792592 Address ASPEN C081611 ''. Applicant ❑J Owner is applicant? ❑ Contractor is applicant? Last name ASPEN MEADOWS HOA TF : First name '':501 E HYMAN - --- -- --- Phone (970)3792592 Cust#;30301 - 201 '.. Address ASPEN C081611 Email' Lender Last name Fist new Phone ( 1 - Address Enter the permit tvoe code AspenGold5 (server) debrap - It RID `06 r 1 of 1 1'00 RECEP111160: 633858, 11114/2016 at 02:06:39 PM; 1 of 7, R $41.00 Doc Code SUB AGREE Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO FIRST AMENDMENT TO "THE ASPEN MEADOWS" SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT ("First Amendment') is entered into effective -5w i /0 2016 by and between the City of Aspen, Colorado, a Municipal Corporation and1lome Rule City, (the "City") and The Trustee Townhomes At -The -Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc., Aspen Institute Inc., Music Associates of Aspen Inc., and Aspen Center for Physics (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Owners"). RECITALS WHEREAS, The "THE ASPEN MEADOWS" SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT was recorded January 24, 1992 as Reception No. 340937 ("Development Agreement'); WHEREAS, The Trustee Townhomes At -The -Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc., submitted an application (the "Application") to the Community Development Department regarding the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision which Application requested amendment to dimensional requirements of the Trustee Townhomes on Lot 5; WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council, under Ordinance No. 25 (Series of 2016) dated September 26, 2016, approved the Application including, without limitation, reallocation of floor area requirements, eliminated bedroom limitations, and removed the overall floor area cap of the Trustee Townhomes; WHEREAS, DEVELOPMENT ORDER of The City of Aspen Community Development Department was issued October 10, 2016; WHEREAS, This First Amendment to the Development Agreement is required by the City in order to confirm and memorialize its approval of the Application. WITNESSETH For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and the Owners hereby amend the Development Agreement as follows: 1. Page 22, Article II, Section E, LOT 5 - THE TRUSTEE HOUSES AT THE ASPEN MEADOWS. The First Paragraph in Section E is deleted and replaced with the following: Lot 5 is zoned RMF according to and as shown on the Plat. Total build -out on Lot 5 shall consist of eleven units. Floor area calculations shall be based on the code in effect at the time of building permit submittal with the following floor area allowances per unit: 2016 Approved Floor Area Unit 1 2,943 sq. ft. Unit 2 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 3 1,836 sq. ft. Unit 4 2,500 sq. ft, Unit 5 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 6 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 7 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 8 1,791 sq. ft. Unit 9 2,500 sq, ft. Unit 10 3,090 sq. fl. Unit 11 2,840 sq, ft. Carports, up to 500 sq. ft., are exempt from floor area calculations for each dwelling unit. 2. Page 22, Article II, Section E (1) Dimensional Requirements and Variations Therefrom. The Dimensional Requirements and Variations Therefrom in Article II, Section E (1) as set forth in the Development Agreement are hereby amended to reflect and include the Approved Floor Area set forth in Section 1 above of this First Amendment. 3. Overall Floor Area Cap or Bedroom Count Removed. All references to an overall floor area cap or bedroom count are hereby stricken from the Development Agreement including, without limitation, all Exhibits thereto. 4. Affordable Housine Mitigation: Lot 5, Trustee Townhomes. Pursuant to the original approval ordinance (Ordinance 14, Series 1991), affordable housing mitigation has been provided for Units 2 through 9. Any future expansion of Units 1, 10, and 11, pursuant to Section 2 Part 21 in Ordinance 14, Series 1991, shall be required to provide affordable housing mitigation based on the Land Use Code in the effect at the time of building permit submittal. The Trustee Townhomes At -The -Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc., a Colorado Non Profit Corporation By: C6I o, Sarpa, P&- i ent �I'AATE OF Cow Y,2 ) )ss. COUNTY OF Pi tk, ;-1 ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this 1jfL-day of 1 e-m l e/ , 20M by John Sarpa as President of The Trustee Townhomes At -The - Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc., a Colorado Non Profit Corporation Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Aspen Institute Inc. ILa STATE OF ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) Saysh Pakzad STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20064050509 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Januasy 18, 9019 The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 120 by as of Aspen Institute Inc. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 4 The Trustee Townhomes At -The -Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc., a Colorado Non Profit Corporation John Sarpa, President STATE OF ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_ by John Sarpa as President of The Trustee Townhomes At -The - Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc., a Colorado Non Profit Corporation Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: , Notary Public Aspen Institute Inc. By: 'r�`p Namita Khasat, EVP, Finance & Administration STATE OF b\J�a (� ) )ss. COUNTY OF A``The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this (� day of l Q\l EM&FFZ , 201 by Namita Khasat as EVP, Finance &Administration of Aspen Institute Inc. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: �,, •�, Notary Public ' ir��urunrr, '. •,, tit t 1.•'Nv Pv' 14, Qt 1P gc; •, , : EBONY T. COPES MAT MEWS Z u" " : = Notary Public District of Columbia My Commission Expires: Sept 14, 2020 �rrrrlN UNN ..+ Music Associates of Aspen Inc., By: �-/W ck� 64n��ot�( r STATE OF } )ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this q� day of Ncye-tMh-e/ 20_L,�by Pa01 G�;hh as of Music Associates of Aspen Inc., Witness my hand and official seal. M EComomi*s LY ESSIG Notary Puhlic of Colorado 200.94002055 E Iros Feb 11, 2017 y comm rssion exp res. Notary Public U Aspen Center for Physics STATE OF ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this 20_ by as for Physics. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 5 day of of Aspen Center ..r Music Associates of Aspen Inc., By: STATE OF ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_ by as of Music Associates of Aspen Inc., Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public Aspen Center for Physics By: Y GG �t y STATE OF r )ss. COUNTY OF r� The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by ) ec Ylc + _ l; �_ as r V i of Aspen Center for Physics. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 0 Notary Public AMANDA JENKINS $TA ETOF COLORIADO NOTANY ID N 20144032707 S [MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 411011S7 20 2 'AWOI %NW 5. Miscellaneous. A. All of the capitalized and defined terms used herein shall have the same meaning as those set forth in the Development Agreement. B. The recording information provided in this First Amendment refers to documents recorded in the real estate records of the clerk and recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. C. This First Amendment has been entered into and recorded pursuant to Article 11, Section (H) (12) of the Development Agreement. To the extent there is any conflict between the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement and this First Amendment, this First Amendment shall govern and control. D. This First Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts which together shall be one and the same instrument, binding on all parties, although not signatory to the same original document. This First Amendment can be executed, delivered, and accepted by any party by facsimile, email or other form of electronic transmission which shall be binding upon the party so executing. Original signatures shall be promptly provided to the party so requesting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment as of the day and year above first written. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 25 (SERIES OF 2016) A ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A MINOR AMENDMENT TO PROJECT REVIEW — MINOR AMENDMENT TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 5 OF THE ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 11-111 MEADOWS ROAD, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. ParcellDs: 273512239001, 273512239002, 273512239003, 273512239004, 273512239005, 273512239006, 273512239007, 273512239008, 273512239009, 273512239010,273512239011 & 273512239800 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application for the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision (the Application) from Aspen Meadows Townhome HOA (Applicant), represented by Poss Architecture and Planning for the following land use review approvals: • Planned Development —Minor Amendment to a Project Review Amendment, pursuant to Land Use Code Chapter 26.445; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned Residential Multi -Family (RMF) with a Planned Development (PD) Overlay; and, , WHEREAS, all code citation references are to the City of Aspen Land Use Code in effect on the day of initial application — March S, 2016 as applicable to this Project; and, WHEREAS, the Application for the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision proposes to amend the dimensional requirements of the Trustee Townhomes on Lot 5; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.445 of the Land Use Code, Planned Development — Minor Amendment to a Project Review approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Community Development Director; and, WHEREAS, for the Community Development Director recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 25 on First Reading five (5) to zero (0) on September 12, 2016; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on September 26, 2016, the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 25, Series of 2016, by a four to zero (4-0) vote granting approval of the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision application and all necessary land use reviews, as identified herein, with the conditions of approval listed hereinafter. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. City Council Ordinance No. 25, Series 2016 Pave I of 3 Now .✓ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1:Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Aspen City Council approves the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision Planned Development — Minor Amendment to a Project Review approval to the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision, subject to the conditions of approval as listed herein. All conditions outlined in all previous approvals remain valid and in effect except as modified herein. Section 2: Approved Dimensions: Lot 5, Trustee Townhomes 2.a. The First Paragraph in Part ILE., LOT 5 —'THE TRUSTEE HOUSES AT THE ASPEN MEADOWS, as outlined in the SPA Development and Subdivision Agreement (Reception No. 340937) is hereby amended to state: Lot 5 is zoned RMF according to and as shown on the Plat. Total build -out on Lot 5 shall consist of eleven units. Floor area calculations shall be based on the code in effect at the time of building permit submittal with the following floor area allowances per unit: 2016 Approved Floor Areal Unit 1 2,943 sq. ft. Unit 2 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 3 1,836 sq. ft. Unit 4 1 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 5 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 6 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 7 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 8 1,791 sq. ft. Unit 9 2,500 sq. ft. Unit 10 3,090 sq. ft. Unit 11 2,840 sq. ft. Carports, up to 500 sq. ft., are exempt from floor area calculations far each dwelling unit. 2.b. All references to an overall floor area cap or bedroom count shall be stricken from the SPA Development and Subdivision Agreement (Reception No. 340937). 2.c. The Dimensional Requirements and Variations Therefrom, in Part HE.1, as outlined in the SPA Development and Subdivision Agreement (Reception No. 340937), shall be amended to reflect the Approved Floor Area in Section 2.a of this Ordinance. Section 3: Affordable Housine Mitisation: Lot 5, Trustee Townhomes Pursuant to the original approval ordinance (Ordinance 14, Series 1991), affordable housing mitigation has been provided for Units 2 through 9. Any future expansion of Units 1, 10, and 11, pursuant to Section 2 Part 21 in Ordinance 14, Series 1991, shall be required to provide affordable housing mitigation based on the Land Use Code in effect at the time of building permit. City Council Ordinance No. 25, Series 2016 Page 2 of 3 ..d Section 3: Subdivision/PD Plat and Agreement The Applicant shall submit an amended Subdivision/PD agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") that meets the requirements of the Land Use Code within 180 days of final approval. The recordation documents shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of Section 26.490 Approval Documents of the Land Use Code. Section 4: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 5• This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 12'h day of September, 2016. Attest: aiR..t,cr Linda Manning, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved thi: Attest: Linda Manning, City Cte Approved as to form: mes R. True, City Attorney City Council Ordinance No. 25, Series 2016 Page 3 of 3 ..r v AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE lw`rn REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, X/19 L/7 JF7rVVR,1eVt N-- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 1/ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of spen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy'l .;, liz�tion �� hereto. The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this.Znay of 0cm?'4tz- PMUC HoT E 01 tl MoPMENf APPIMAL WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL my om/m1Qilsssi�on Vt/t,Ct�i(/f/v Notary Public ATTACHMENTS: P I 1�a aSP®n rm.s o� ocroGar zo, COPY OF 777E P UBLIC,4770N 21,,3.r /1 NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE Or COLORADO Notary Identification #20154012950 My Commission Exoires 3/3112019 M DEVELOPMENT ORDER of the City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order', is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Aspen Meadows Townhomes HOA 71 Meadows Road Aspen CO 81811 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address 11-111 Meadows Road Legally Described as Lot 5 of The Aspen Meadows Subdivision, City Aspen, County of Pitkin. State of Colorado. Legal Description and Streel Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval to reallocate floor area requirements between 11 existing units eliminate bedroom limitations and remove the overall floor area cap of the Trustee Townhomes Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Planned Development - Project Review Approval granted by City Council in Ordinance No 25 Series 2016 on September 261h, 2016 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) October 201h 2016 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval) October 20`h, 2019 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City, of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 10`h day of October, 2016, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 11"b1 J ssica Ga*J Community Development Director V V MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Hillary Seminick, Planner THRU: Jessica Garrow, Community Development Director RE: Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes Planned Development — Minor Amendment to a Project Review Second Reading of Ordinance No. 25, Series of 2016 MEETING DATE: September 26, 2016 APPLICANT /OWNER: Aspen Meadows Townhomes HOA 71 Meadows Road Aspen CO 81811 970.379.2595 REPRESENTATIVE: Kim Weil, Poss Architecture LOCATION: 11 —111 Meadows Road Aspen CO 81611 Trustee Townhomes, Lot 5 Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision CURRENT ZONING: Residential Multi -Family (RMF) with a Planned Development Overlay SUMMARY: The Aspen Meadows HOA requests an amendment to reallocate floor area between units, eliminate bedroom limitations, and remove the overall floor area cap of the Trustee Townhomes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request. Figure 1. Vicinity Map Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Pagel of 5 rr 0 REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL: The Applicant is requesting the following approval from City Council for the following land use approvals: • A Planned Development Project Review, Minor Amendment (Chapter 26.445) to increase floor area requirements, eliminate the bedroom limitations and remove the overall floor area cap. (City Council is the final review authority.) EXISTING CONDITIONS AND HISTORY: Aspen Meadows is located at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Castle Creek. The Planned Development overlay has a number of underlying zone districts including Academic, Open Space, and Residential Multi -Family. The subject of this amendment, the Trustee Townhomes (The Townhomes), containing 11 multi -family units, are located on Lot 5 of the subdivision. Aspen Meadows was approved with a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay in 1992. In 2013, all SPA in the city were converted to Planned Development (PD). The underlying zoning of the Trustee Townhomes is RMF. Figure 2 provides an overview of the Aspen Meadows. Only Lot 5 is the subject of this amendment. Eight of The Townhomes were developed in the 1960s in conjunction with the Aspen Institute. Three additional townhomes were approved and subsequently constructed when the SPA (now a PD) was established by Ordinance No. 12, Series 1991 (Exhibit B). Final dimensional requirements were set by the 1992 SPA and Subdivision Agreement (Exhibit Q. Each of the 11 units were granted a total of 2,500 sq. ft. of FAR. The number of permitted bedrooms was limited to three per unit. Additionally, each unit received a 500 sq. ft. carport exemption. Lot 5 floor area is not to exceed a maximum total floor area of 27,500 sq. ft, with each unit limited to 2,500 sq. ft. of floor area. Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Page 2 of 5 V V Units 2-9 are the eight original units constructed in the 1960s. Units 1, 10, and 11 constructed more recently in the 1990s. The floor area was for Units 1, 10 and 11 was calculated under land use code requirements at the time. The method of calculation for floor area has changed since the 1990s, creating a non -conforming floor area condition for the three newer units. The applicant proposes to reduce the non -conforming floor area by 64 square feet for Units 10 and 11. Unit 1 will have no non -conforming floor area. PROPOSAL: The Applicant wishes to redistribute the maximum unit floor area. The three units, Units 1, 10 and 11, approved and constructed in the 1990, are now larger than the allowed maximum unit size. The discrepancy in the current floor area of these units and the approved dimensions are attributed to how the floor area was calculated at the time of construction vs. current floor area calculation methods. The Applicant wishes to resolve this discrepancy between the existing floor area numbers for these units and the original approval by redistributing floor area allocated to Unit 3 to Units 1, 10, and 11, further described below. Bedroom Requirement: The Applicant has requested to remove the bedroom cap on all of the units. Bedroom requirements were typical when the planned development was established in the early 1990ies. Maximum Floor Area Requirement: Currently, the maximum floor area for Lot 5 is 27,500, to be distributed between the 11 units. There is a request to remove the overall 27,500 sq. ft. floor area cap and establish a maximum allowed floor area for each of the units. Redistribution of Floor Area: Initially, the proposed redistribution and floor area increase resulted in a maximum floor area of 28,150 sq. ft. The Applicant revised the request based on initial conversations to more closely align the request with the existing dimensional approvals. The redistribution would establish the floor area requirement by unit and remove the overall floor area cap. The applicant also requests to legalize the existing floor area, of Units 1, 10, and 11. The applicant proposes to achieve this by pulling remaining development rights from Units 3 and 8, essentially sterilizing these units at their existing dimensions. Units 2, 4-7 and 9 are not proposed to change as part of this amendment. Table 1, below, outlines the existing dimensions of Units 1, 3, 8, 10 and 11 to be memorialized as part of this amendment, in addition to the remaining townhomes, Units 2, 4-7, and 9, to maintain the current approved development rights of 2.500 sq. ft. each. CHANGES SINCE FIRST READING: Since First Reading, the Applicant has revised the application and removed the request for an overall floor area increase of 128 square feet. The applicant has achieved this by removed 64 square feet from the allowed floor area in Units 10 and 11. Beyond this change, reallocation of floor area is the same. Units 10 and 11 are currently over their allowed floor area and are considered non -conforming structures. Part of the applicant's request was intended to legalize the existing conditions in the units. However, the unit owners have agreed to the 64 square foot reduction in order to ensure the overall allowed floor area of the project is not increased beyond 27,500 square feet. This means that when these unit owners submit for a building permit to remodel their units, the non -conforming 64 sq. ft. would be subject to Chapter 26.312 Nonconformities, as amended. Under today's code, should a remodel trigger demolition, the unit shall be reduced in size by 64 square feet in order to comply with this amendment. It should be noted that currently Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Page 3 of 5 W the overall floor area for all the units is lower than what is allowed at 24,341 square feet. The amendment to the dimensional request is further described in Table A of this memo and can be summarized as: • No physical change is proposed to the current dimensions in Units 1, 10, and 11. • No change to the maximum floor area is proposed for Units 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9. These units currently have a floor area lower than the allowed 2,500 square feet. • Units 3 and 8 have agreed to reallocate all of their unbuilt floor area to Units 1, 10, and 11. Staff supports this amendment as it will result in a reduction of non -conforming floor area. Lastly, because the overall floor area is not proposed to increase the project is no longer generating a need for additional affordable housing mitigation. The ordinance has been amended to reflect these changes to the request. Table A. Second Reading Floor Area Approved and Proposed Unit Dimensions Approved Dimensions 1 Current Floor Area Second Reading Requested Floor Area Net Change between Approved and Proposed Unit 1 2,500 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft. 443 sf Unit 2 2,500 sq. ft. 2,112 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. -0 sq. ft. Unit 3 2,500 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. -664 sq. ft. Unit 4 2,500 sq. ft. 2,116 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 5 2,500 sq. ft. 1,723 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 6 2,500 sq. ft. 1,786 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 7 1 2,500 sq. ft. 1,764 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 8 2,500 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. -790 sq. ft. Unit 9 2,500 sq. ft. 2,212 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 10 2,500 sq. ft. 3,154 sq. ft. 3,090 sq. ft. 590 sq. ft. Unit 11 2,500 sq. ft. 2,904 sq. ft. 2,840 sq. ft. 340 sq. ft. Total 27,500 sq. ft. 24,341 sq. ft. 27,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. 1 As calculated under today's methodology STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant's request to amend the dimensional approvals has three components. • One, eliminate the bedroom number requirement; and, • Remove the aggregated floor area cap allocated to Lot 5; and, • Reallocate the floor area between the 11 townhome units. Considerations for each are outlined below. Bedroom Requirement: The Applicant requests this provision be removed. The basis for the requirement reflected affordable housing mitigation requirements at the time the SPA was established. This limitation was typical of PDs and SPAs approved at the time. Affordable housing mitigation is no longer provided on the number of bedrooms, rather, it is based on an increase in square footage per unit. Each of the twnhomes has satisfied the affordable housing mitigation Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes - Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Page 4 of 5 .r 14 , that was required at their time of their initial construction. Staff recommends removing the bedroom limitation to be more consistent with current code and mitigation requirements. Maximum Floor Area Requirement: Currently, if a unit within The Townhomes is expanded, the owner/applicant is required to provide floor area calculations for not just their unit, but all units on Lot 5. This can be both costly and time consuming. The Applicant proposes that the overall floor area cap be removed and a maximum floor area per unit be relied upon for the dimensional requirement of each unit. This would enable each property owner to only need to provide floor area calculations for their unit, not the entire Lot. Staff recommends removing the maximum floor area requirement, relying on the individual floor area caps. Redistribution of Floor Area: The Applicant would like to redistribute the floor area between units The dimensions were established using the underlying zoning, RMF, as a guideline. Redistribution of floor area between units within 27,500 sq. ft. will result in a decrease of non -conforming floor area. Staff is supportive of redistributing the floor area between units provided the existing overall floor area cap of27,500 sq. ft. is not exceeded. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to redistribute floor area between units, remove the bedroom number requirement, and remove the maximum lot floor area requirement. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Ordinance 25, Series 2016, City Council grant approval for a Planned Development, Minor Amendment to a Project Review." Attachments: Exhibit A.1— Planned Development Project Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit B — Ordinance No. 12, Series 1991 Exhibit C — Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision Agreement Exhibit D — Application Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Page 5 of 5 ..r D. Minor Amendment to a Project Review approval. An amendment found by the Community Development Director to be generally consistent with the allowances and limitations of a Project Review approval or which otherwise represents an insubstantial change but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the City Council, pursuant to 26.445.040.B.2 — Step Two. An applicant may not apply for Detailed Review if an amendment is pending. 26.445.050. Project Review Standards. The Project Review shall focus on the general concept for the development and shall outline any dimensional requirements that vary from those allowed in the underlying zone district. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this Title. The underlying zone district designation shall be used as a guide, but not an absolute limitation, to the dimensions which may be considered during the development review process. Any dimensional variations allowed shall be specified in the ordinance granting Project Approval. In the review of a development application for a Project Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, and City Council shall consider the following: A. Compliance with Adopted Regulatory Plans. The proposed development complies with applicable adopted regulatory plans. Staff Findings: The property is not subject to any regulatory plans. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. B. Development Suitability. The proposed Planned Development prohibits development on land unsuitable for development because of natural or man-made hazards affecting the property, including flooding, mudflow, debris flow, fault ruptures, landslides, rock or soil creep, rock falls, rock slides, mining activity including mine waste deposit, avalanche or snowslide areas, slopes in excess of 30%, and any other natural or man-made hazard or condition that could harm the health, safety, or welfare of the community. Affected areas may be accepted as suitable for development if adequate mitigation techniques acceptable to the City Engineer are proposed in compliance with Title 29 — Engineering Design Standards. Conceptual plans for mitigation techniques may be accepted for this standard. The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. C. Site Planning. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 1. The site plan responds to the site's natural characteristics and physical constraints such as steep slopes, vegetation, waterways, and any natural or man-made hazards and allows development to blend in with or enhance said features. 2. The project preserves important geologic features, mature vegetation, and structures or features of the site that have historic, cultural, visual, or ecological importance or contribute to the identity of the town. 3. Buildings are oriented to public streets and are sited to reflect the neighborhood context. Buildings and access ways are arranged to allow effective emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. D. Dimensions. All dimensions, including density, mass, and height shall be established during the Project Review. A development application may request variations to any dimensional requirement of this Title. In meeting this standard, consideration shall be given to the following criteria: 1. There exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such variations. 2. The proposed dimensions represent a character suitable for and indicative of the primary uses of the project. 3. The project is compatible with or enhances the cohesiveness or distinctive identity of the neighborhood and surrounding development patterns, including the scale and massing of nearby historical or cultural resources. 4. The number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the probable number of cars to be operated by those using the proposed development and the nature of the proposed uses. The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development, and the potential for joint use of common parking may be considered when establishing a parking requirement. 5. The Project Review approval, at City Council's discretion, may include specific allowances for dimensional flexibility between Project Review and Detailed Review. Changes shall be subject to the amendment procedures of Section 26.445.110 — Amendments. Staff Findings: The Trustee Townhomes on Lot 5 of the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision were granted dimensional approval in 1992 based on the underlying zone district (RMF) requirements. Each of the I units were granted a total of 2,500 sq. ft. of FAR. Additionally, each unit received a 500 sq. ft. carport (garage) exemption. Lot 5 FAR is not to exceed a maximum floor area of 27,500 sq. ft. The SPA limits the number of bedrooms in each unit to three, the Applicant wants to remove this requirement. The Applicant wishes to reallocate the maximum unit sizes and remove the overall 27, 500 sq. ft. floor area cap. An analysis of these figures is provided below. [Continued on following page] Table 1. Approved vs Proposed Dimensions Approved Dimensions Current Floor Area Second Reading Requested Floor Area Net Change between Approved and Proposed Unit 1 2,500 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft. 443 sf Unit 2 2,500 sq. ft. 2,112 sq. ft. 2.500 sq. ft. -0 sq. ft. Unit 3 2,500 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. -664 sq. ft. Unit 4 2,500 sq. ft. 2,116 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 5 2,500 sq. ft. 1,723 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 6 2,500 sq. ft. 1,786 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 7 2,500 sq. ft. 1,764 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 8 2,500 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. -790 sq. ft. Unit 9 2,500 sq. ft. 2,212 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 10 2,500 sq. ft. 3,154 sq. ft. 3,090 sq. ft. 590 sq. ft./64 sf no con Unit 11 2,500 sq. ft. 2,904 sq. ft. 2,840 sq. ft. 340 sq. ft. /64 sf non con Total 27,500 sq. ft. 24,341 sq. ft. 27,500 sq, ft. 0 sq. ft. Staff supports the removal of the bedroom requirement because it is based on a method of affordable housing mitigation that is no longer required under today's Code. Staff does support the redistribution offloor area between the existing units. Staff finds this criterion met. E. Design Standards. The design of the proposed development is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 1. The design complies with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. 2. The proposed materials are compatible with those called for in any applicable design standards, as well as those typically seen in the immediate vicinity. Exterior materials are finalized during Detailed Review, but review boards may set forth certain expectations or conditions related to architectural character and exterior materials during Project Review. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time; therefore, there is no proposed design changes to review. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 1%W v F. Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any vehicular access points, or curb cuts, minimize impacts on existing or proposed pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. The City may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Sta finds this criterion is not applicable. G. Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the project to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 — Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. H. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Sta rinds this criterion is not applicable. I. Access and Circulation. The proposed development shall have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed Planned Development shall not eliminate or obstruct legal access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Planned Development retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Sta finds this criterion is not applicable. V M MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Hillary Seminick, Planner THRU: Jessica Garrow, Community Development Director RE: Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes Planned Development — Minor Amendment to a Project Review First Reading of Ordinance No. 25, Series of 2016 Second Reading is scheduled for September 26, 2016 MEETING DATE: September 12, 2016 APPLICANT /OWNER: Aspen Meadows Townhomes HOA 71 Meadows Road Aspen CO 81811 970.379.2595 REPRESENTATIVE: Kim Weil, Poss Architecture LOCATION: 11 —111 Meadows Road Aspen CO 81611 Trustee Townhomes, Lot 5 Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision CURRENT ZONING: Residential Multi -Family (RMF) with a Planned Development Overlay SUMMARY: The Aspen Meadows HOA requests an amendment to increase the floor area requirements, eliminate bedroom limitations and remove the overall floor area cap of the Trustee Townhomes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the request to add floor area but approve other dimensional changes. Figure 1. Vicinity Map Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 12, 2016 Memo Page 1 of 6 0 REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL: The Applicant is requesting the following approval from City Council for the following land use approvals: • A Planned Development Project Review, Minor Amendment (Chapter 26.445) to increase floor area requirements, eliminate the bedroom limitations and remove the overall floor area cap. (City Council is the final review authority.) EXISTING CONDITIONS AND HISTORY: Aspen Meadows is located at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Castle Creek. The Planned Development overlay has a number of underlying zone districts including Academic, Open Space, and Residential Multi -Family. The subject of this amendment, the Trustee Townhomes (The Townhomes), containing 11 multi -family units, are located on Lot 5 of the subdivision. Aspen Meadows was approved with a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay in 1992. In 2013, all SPA in the city were converted to Planned Development (PD). The underlying zoning of the Trustee Townhomes is RMF. Figure 2 provides an overview of the Aspen Meadows. Only Lot 5 is the subject of this amendment. Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townbomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 12, 2016 Memo Page 2 of 6 1✓ Eight of The Townhomes were developed in the 1960s in conjunction with the Aspen Institute. Three additional townhomes were approved and subsequently constructed when the SPA (now a PD) was established by Ordinance No. 12, Series 1991 (Exhibit B). Final dimensional requirements were set by the 1992 SPA and Subdivision Agreement (Exhibit Q. Each of the 11 units were granted a total of 2,500 sq. ft. of FAR. The number of permitted bedrooms was limited to three per unit. Additionally, each unit received a 500 sq. ft. carport (garage) exemption. Lot 5 floor area is not to exceed a maximum total floor area of 27,500 sq. ft, with each unit limited to 2,500 sq. ft. of floor area. PROPOSAL: The Applicant wishes to redistribute the maximum unit floor area. The three units, Units 1, 10 and 11, approved and constructed in the 1990, are now larger than the allowed maximum unit size. The discrepancy in the current floor area of these units and the approved dimensions are attributed to how the floor area was calculated at the time of construction vs. current floor area calculation methods. The Applicant wishes to resolve this discrepancy between the existing floor area numbers for these units and the original approval by redistributing floor area allocated to Unit 3 to Units 1, 10, and 11, further described below. Bedroom Requirement: The Applicant has requested to remove the bedroom cap on all of the units. Bedroom requirements were typical when the planned development was established in the early 1990ies. Maximum Floor Area Requirement Currently, the maximum floor area for Lot 5 is 27,500, to be distributed between the 11 units. There is a request to remove the overall 27,500 sq. ft. floor area cap and establish a maximum allowed floor area for each of the units. Redistribution of Floor Area: Initially, the proposed redistribution and floor area increase resulted in a maximum floor area of 28,150 sq. ft. The Applicant revised the request based on initial conversations to more closely align the request with the existing dimensional approvals. The redistribution would establish the floor area requirement by unit and remove the overall floor area cap. The applicant also requests to legalize the existing floor area, of Units 1, 10, and 11. The applicant proposes to achieve this by pulling remaining development rights from Units 3 and 8, essentially sterilizing these units at their existing dimensions. Units 2, 4-7 and 9 are not proposed to change as part of this amendment. As proposed, the new allowed dimensions of the Townhomes would be 27,628 sq. ft., as calculated under the current land use code, which is 128 sq. ft. over the allowed floor area of 27,500 sq. ft. Table 1, below, outlines the existing dimensions of Units 1, 3, 8, 10 and 11 to be memorialized as part of this amendment, in addition to the remaining townhomes, Units 2, 4-7, and 9, to maintain the current approved development rights of 2.500 sq. ft. each. [Continued on following page] Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 12, 2016 Memo Page 3 of 6 %W TDimensio:ns Current Floor Areal Proposed Floor Area Net Change between Approved and Proposed n,sq.ft. 2,943 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft.' 443 sf Unit 2 2,500 sq. ft. 2,112 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft.3 -0 sq. ft. Unit 3 2,500 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. 1,81 sq. ft.4 -664 sq. ft. Unit 4 2,500 sq. ft. 2,116 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft.3 0 sq. ft. Unit 5 2,500 sq. ft. 1,723 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft.3 0 sq. ft. Unit 6 2,500 sq. ft. 1,786 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft.3 0 sq. ft. Unit 7 2,500 sq. ft. 1,764 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft.3 0 sq. ft. Unit 8 2,500 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft a -790 sq. ft. Unit 9 2,500 sq. ft. 2,212 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft a 0 sq. ft. Unit 10 2,500 sq. ft. 3,154 sq. ft. 3,154 sq. ft.Z 654 sq. ft. Unit 11 2,500 sq. ft. 2,904 sq. ft. 2,904 sq. ft.2 404 sq. ft. Total 1 27,500 sq. ft. 24,341 sq. ft. 27,628 sq. ft. 128 sq. ft. 'Ts calculated under today's methodology 2 No physical change to the current dimensions, amendment will only memorialize existing floor area as calculated under today's methodology 'No change to the maximum floor area is proposed as part of this amendment. These units have not fully realized their development rights as calculated under today's code. Development rights for these units are being sterilized at the current floor area as exists today. The floor area from these units shall be transferred to units 1, 10, and 11. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant's request to amend the dimensional approvals has three components. • One, eliminate the bedroom number requirement; and, • Remove the aggregated floor area cap allocated to Lot 5; and, • Reallocate the floor area between the 11 townhome units. Considerations for each are outlined below. Bedroom Requirement: The Applicant requests this provision be removed. The basis for the requirement reflected affordable housing mitigation requirements at the time the SPA was established. This limitation was typical of PDs and SPAS approved at the time. Affordable housing mitigation is no longer provided on the number of bedrooms, rather, it is based on an increase in square footage per unit. The Code requires 0.18 FTEs be mitigated for every 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area. To increase the allowed dimensions as proposed in this amendment, the mitigation required is 0.02304 FTEs (128/1000 * 0.18 FTEs = 0.02304). Fee -in -lieu is permitted by right under the Code because the number of FTEs generated by this amendment is below 0.10 FTEs. The ordinance includes a condition to reflect this requirement. Staff recommends removing the bedroom limitation to be more consistent with current code and mitigation requirements. Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes - Minor Project Review Amendment September 12, 2016 Memo Page 4 of 6 ..r Maximum Floor Area Requirement: Currently, if a unit within The Townhomes is expanded, the owner/applicant is required to provide floor area calculations for not just their unit, but all units on Lot 5. This can be both costly and time consuming. The Applicant proposes that the cap is removed and a maximum floor area per unit be relied upon for the dimensional requirement of each unit. Staff recommends removing the maximum floor area requirement, relying on the individual floor area caps. However, Staff does not support increasing the floor area of Lot 5. Redistribution of Floor Area: The Applicant would like to redistribute the floor area between units and increase the overall floor are for Lot 5 by 128 sq. ft., as shown in Table 1. The dimensions were established using the underlying zoning, RMF, as a guideline. Increasing the maximum floor area of Lot 5 does not achieve any significant community goals. Redistribution of floor area between units within 27,500 sq. ft. will not result in an overall increase in floor area. Staff is supportive of redistributing the floor area between units provided the existing overall floor area cap of 27, 500 sq. ft is not exceeded. Staff does not support an increase in the overall floor area allocated to Lot 5. Rather, Staffrecommends a further redistribution offloor area so the total floor area allocated to Lot 5 does not exceed the currently allowed 27, 500 sq. ft. Table 2. Staff Recommended Dimensions Approved Dimensions Current Floor Area Proposed Floor Area Net Change between Approved and Proposed Unit 1 2,500 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft. 443 sf Unit 2 2,500 sq. ft. 2,112 sq. ft. 2,479 sq. ft. -21 sq. ft. Unit 3 2,500 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. -664 sq. ft. Unit 4 2,500 sq. ft. 2,116 sq. ft. 2,479 sq. ft. -21 sq. ft. Unit 5 2,500 sq. ft. 1,723 sq. ft. 2,479 sq. ft. -21 sq. ft. Unit 6 2,500 sq. ft. 1,786 sq. ft. 2,479 sq. ft. -21 sq. ft. Unit 7 2,500 sq. ft. 1,764 sq. ft. 2,478 sq. ft. -22 sq. ft. Unit 8 2,500 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 9 2,5 00 sq. ft. 2,212 sq. ft. 2,478 sq. ft. -22 sq. ft. Unit 10 2,500 sq. ft. 3,154 sq. ft. 3,154 sq. ft. 654 sq. ft. Unit 11 2,500 sq. ft. 2,904 sq. ft. 2,904 sf sq. ft. 404 sq. ft. Total 27,500 sq. ft. 24,341 sq. ft. 27,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to remove the bedroom number requirement and the maximum lot floor area requirement. While Staff is generally supportive of the redistribution of the floor area between the units, Staff does not support an overall increase of the floor area allowed on Lot 5. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Ordinance , Series 2016, City Council grant approval for a Planned Development, Minor Amendment to a Project Review, on First Reading. Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes - Minor Project Review Amendment September 12, 2016 Memo Page 5 of 6 rr W Attachments: Exhibit A.1 — Planned Development Project Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit B — Ordinance No. 12, Series 1991 Exhibit C — Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision Agreement Exhibit D — Application Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 12, 2016 Memo Page 6 of 6 r✓ �J lul D113 ce1;XIa 11110 i TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Hillary Seminick, Planner THRU: Jessica Garrow, Community Development Director RE: Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes Planned Development — Minor Amendment to a Project Review Second Reading of Ordinance No. 25, Series of 2016 MEETING DATE: September 26, 2016 APPLICANT /OWNER: Aspen Meadows Townhomes HOA 71 Meadows Road Aspen CO 81811 970.379.2595 REPRESENTATIVE: Kim Weil, Poss Architecture LOCATION: 11 —111 Meadows Road Aspen CO 81611 Trustee Townhomes, Lot 5 Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision CURRENT ZONING: Residential Multi -Family (RMF) with a Planned Development Overlay SUMMARY: The Aspen Meadows HOA requests an amendment to reallocate floor area between units, eliminate bedroom limitations, and remove the overall floor area cap of the Trustee Townhomes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request. Figure 1. Vicinity Map Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Page 1 of 5 REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL: The Applicant is requesting the following approval from City Council for the following land use approvals: • A Planned Development Project Review, Minor Amendment (Chapter 26.445) to increase floor area requirements, eliminate the bedroom limitations and remove the overall floor area cap. (City Council is the final review authority.) EXISTING CONDITIONS AND HISTORY: Aspen Meadows is located at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Castle Creek. The Planned Development overlay has a number of underlying zone districts including Academic, Open Space, and Residential Multi -Family. The subject of this amendment, the Trustee Townhomes (The Townhomes), containing 11 multi -family units, are located on Lot 5 of the subdivision. Aspen Meadows was approved with a Specially Planned Area (SPA) overlay in 1992. In 2013, all SPA in the city were converted to Planned Development (PD). The underlying zoning of the Trustee Townhomes is RMF. Figure 2 provides an overview of the Aspen Meadows. Only Lot 5 is the subject of this amendment. Eight of The Townhomes were developed in the 1960s in conjunction with the Aspen Institute. Three additional townhomes were approved and subsequently constructed when the SPA (now a PD) was established by Ordinance No. 12, Series 1991 (Exhibit B). Final dimensional requirements were set by the 1992 SPA and Subdivision Agreement (Exhibit Q. Each of the 11 units were granted a total of 2,500 sq. ft. of FAR. The number of permitted bedrooms was limited to three per unit. Additionally, each unit received a 500 sq. ft. carport exemption. Lot 5 floor area is not to exceed a maximum total floor area of 27,500 sq. ft, with each unit limited to 2,500 sq. ft. of floor area. Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Page 2 of 5 VAW -.Noe Units 2-9 are the eight original units constructed in the 1960s. Units 1, 10, and 11 constructed more recently in the 1990s. The floor area was for Units 1, 10 and 11 was calculated under land use code requirements at the time. The method of calculation for floor area has changed since the 1990s, creating a non -conforming floor area condition for the three newer units. The applicant proposes to reduce the non -conforming floor area by 64 square feet for Units 10 and 11. Unit 1 will have no non -conforming floor area. PROPOSAL: The Applicant wishes to redistribute the maximum unit floor area. The three units, Units 1, 10 and 11, approved and constructed in the 1990, are now larger than the allowed maximum unit size. The discrepancy in the current floor area of these units and the approved dimensions are attributed to how the floor area was calculated at the time of construction vs. current floor area calculation methods. The Applicant wishes to resolve this discrepancy between the existing floor area numbers for these units and the original approval by redistributing floor area allocated to Unit 3 to Units 1, 10, and 11, further described below. Bedroom Requirement: The Applicant has requested to remove the bedroom cap on all of the units. Bedroom requirements were typical when the planned development was established in the early 1990ies. Maximum Floor Area Requirement: Currently, the maximum floor area for Lot 5 is 27,500, to be distributed between the 11 units. There is a request to remove the overall 27,500 sq. ft. floor area cap and establish a maximum allowed floor area for each of the units. Redistribution of Floor Area: Initially, the proposed redistribution and floor area increase resulted in a maximum floor area of 28,150 sq. ft. The Applicant revised the request based on initial conversations to more closely align the request with the existing dimensional approvals. The redistribution would establish the floor area requirement by unit and remove the overall floor area cap. The applicant also requests to legalize the existing floor area, of Units 1, 10, and 11. The applicant proposes to achieve this by pulling remaining development rights from Units 3 and 8, essentially sterilizing these units at their existing dimensions. Units 2, 4-7 and 9 are not proposed to change as part of this amendment. Table 1, below, outlines the existing dimensions of Units 1, 3, 8, 10 and 11 to be memorialized as part of this amendment, in addition to the remaining townhomes, Units 2, 4-7, and 9, to maintain the current approved development rights of 2.500 sq. ft. each. CHANGES SINCE FIRST READING: Since First Reading, the Applicant has revised the application and removed the request for an overall floor area increase of 128 square feet. The applicant has achieved this by removed 64 square feet from the allowed floor area in Units 10 and 11. Beyond this change, reallocation of floor area is the same. Units 10 and 11 are currently over their allowed floor area and are considered non -conforming structures. Part of the applicant's request was intended to legalize the existing conditions in the units. However, the unit owners have agreed to the 64 square foot reduction in order to ensure the overall allowed floor area of the project is not increased beyond 27,500 square feet. This means that when these unit owners submit for a building permit to remodel their units, the non -conforming 64 sq. ft. would be subject to Chapter 26.312 Nonconformities, as amended. Under today's code, should a remodel trigger demolition, the unit shall be reduced in size by 64 square feet in order to comply with this amendment. It should be noted that currently Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes - Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Page 3 of 5 'fin' 14WO the overall floor area for all the units is lower than what is allowed at 24,341 square feet. The amendment to the dimensional request is further described in Table A of this memo and can be summarized as: • No physical change is proposed to the current dimensions in Units 1, 10, and 11. • No change to the maximum floor area is proposed for Units 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9. These units currently have a floor area lower than the allowed 2,500 square feet. • Units 3 and 8 have agreed to reallocate all of their unbuilt floor area to Units 1, 10, and 11. Staff supports this amendment as it will result in a reduction of non -conforming floor area. Lastly, because the overall floor area is not proposed to increase the project is no longer generating a need for additional affordable housing mitigation. The ordinance has been amended to reflect these changes to the request. Tnhle A_ Ceennd Reading Flonr Area Approved and Proposed Unit Dimensions Approved Dimensions Current Floor Area Second Reading Requested Floor Area Net Change between Approved and Proposed Unit 1 2,500 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft. 2,943 sq. ft. 443 sf Unit 2 2,500 sq. ft. 2,112 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. -0 sq. ft. Unit 3 2,500 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. -664 sq. ft. Unit 4 2,500 sq. ft. 2,116 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 5 2,500 sq. ft. 1,723 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 6 2,500 sq. ft. 1,786 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 7 2,500 sq. ft. 1,764 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 8 2,500 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. -790 sq. ft. Unit 9 2,500 sq. ft. 2,212 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 10 2,500 sq. ft. 3,154 sq. ft. 3,090 sq. ft. 590 sq. ft. Unit 11 2,500 sq. ft. 2,904 sq. ft. 2,840 sq. ft. 340 sq. ft. Total 27,500 sq. ft. 24,341 sq. ft. 27,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. I As calculated under today's methodology STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant's request to amend the dimensional approvals has three components. • One, eliminate the bedroom number requirement; and, • Remove the aggregated floor area cap allocated to Lot 5; and, • Reallocate the floor area between the 11 townhome units. Considerations for each are outlined below. Bedroom Requirement: The Applicant requests this provision be removed. The basis for the requirement reflected affordable housing mitigation requirements at the time the SPA was established. This limitation was typical of PDs and SPAS approved at the time. Affordable housing mitigation is no longer provided on the number of bedrooms, rather, it is based on an increase in square footage per unit. Each of the townhomes has satisfied the affordable housing mitigation Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes - Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Page 4 of 5 that was required at their time of their initial construction. Staff recommends removing the bedroom limitation to be more consistent with current code and mitigation requirements. Maximum Floor Area Requirement: Currently, if a unit within The Towmhomes is expanded, the owner/applicant is required to provide floor area calculations for not just their unit, but all units on Lot 5. This can be both costly and time consuming. The Applicant proposes that the overall floor area cap be removed and a maximum floor area per unit be relied upon for the dimensional requirement of each unit. This would enable each property owner to only need to provide floor area calculations for their unit, not the entire Lot. Staff recommends removing the maximum floor area requirement, relying on the individual floor area caps. Redistribution of Floor Area: The Applicant would like to redistribute the floor area between units The dimensions were established using the underlying zoning, RMF, as a guideline. Redistribution of floor area between units within 27,500 sq. ft. will result in a decrease of non -conforming floor area. Staff is supportive of redistributing the floor area between units provided the existing overall floor area cap of 27,500 sq. ft. is not exceeded. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to redistribute floor area between units, remove the bedroom number requirement, and remove the maximum lot floor area requirement. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Ordinance 25, Series 2016, City Council grant approval for a Planned Development, Minor Amendment to a Project Review." Attachments: Exhibit A.1 — Planned Development Project Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit B — Ordinance No. 12, Series 1991 Exhibit C — Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision Agreement Exhibit D — Application Aspen Meadows SPA & Subdivision, Trustee Townhomes — Minor Project Review Amendment September 26, 2016 Memo Page 5 of 5 %W .. D. Minor Amendment to a Project Review approval. An amendment found by the Community Development Director to be generally consistent with the allowances and limitations of a Project Review approval or which otherwise represents an insubstantial change but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the City Council, pursuant to 26.445.040.B.2 — Step Two. An applicant may not apply for Detailed Review if an amendment is pending. 26.445.050. Project Review Standards. The Project Review shall focus on the general concept for the development and shall outline any dimensional requirements that vary from those allowed in the underlying zone district. The burden shall rest upon an applicant to show the reasonableness of the development application and its conformity to the standards and procedures of this Chapter and this Title. The underlying zone district designation shall be used as a guide, but not an absolute limitation, to the dimensions which may be considered during the development review process. Any dimensional variations allowed shall be specified in the ordinance granting Project Approval. In the review of a development application for a Project Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, and City Council shall consider the following: A. Compliance with Adopted Regulatory Plans. The proposed development complies with applicable adopted regulatory plans. Staff Findings: The property is not subject to any regulatory plans. Staff rinds this criterion is not applicable. B. Development Suitability. The proposed Planned Development prohibits development on land unsuitable for development because of natural or man-made hazards affecting the property, including flooding, mudflow, debris flow, fault ruptures, landslides, rock or soil creep, rock falls, rock slides, mining activity including mine waste deposit, avalanche or snowslide areas, slopes in excess of 30%, and any other natural or man-made hazard or condition that could harm the health, safety, or welfare of the community. Affected areas may be accepted as suitable for development if adequate mitigation techniques acceptable to the City Engineer are proposed in compliance with Title 29 — Engineering Design Standards. Conceptual plans for mitigation techniques may be accepted for this standard. The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Sta finds this criterion is not applicable. C. Site Planning. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: The site plan responds to the site's natural characteristics and physical constraints such as steep slopes, vegetation, waterways, and any natural or man-made hazards and allows development to blend in with or enhance said features. 2. The project preserves important geologic features, mature vegetation, and structures or features of the site that have historic, cultural, visual, or ecological importance or contribute to the identity of the town. Buildings are oriented to public streets and are sited to reflect the neighborhood context. Buildings and access ways are arranged to allow effective emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Staff rinds this criterion is not applicable. D. Dimensions. All dimensions, including density, mass, and height shall be established during the Project Review. A development application may request variations to any dimensional requirement of this Title. In meeting this standard, consideration shall be given to the following criteria: 1. There exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such variations. 2. The proposed dimensions represent a character suitable for and indicative of the primary uses of the project. 3. The project is compatible with or enhances the cohesiveness or distinctive identity of the neighborhood and surrounding development patterns, including the scale and massing of nearby historical or cultural resources. 4. The number of off-street parking spaces shall be established based on the probable number of cars to be operated by those using the proposed development and the nature of the proposed uses. The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities, including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development, and the potential for joint use of common parking may be considered when establishing a parking requirement. 5. The Project Review approval, at City Council's discretion, may include specific allowances for dimensional flexibility between Project Review and Detailed Review. Changes shall be subject to the amendment procedures of Section 26.445.110 — Amendments. Staff Findings: The Trustee Townhomes on Lot 5 of the Aspen Meadows SPA and Subdivision were granted dimensional approval in 1992 based on the underlying zone district (RMF) requirements. Each of the 11 units were granted a total of 2,500 sq. ft. of FAR. Additionally, each unit received a 500 sq. ft. carport (garage) exemption. Lot 5 FAR is not to exceed a maximum floor area of 27,500 sq. ft. The SPA limits the number of bedrooms in each unit to three, the Applicant wants to remove this requirement. The Applicant wishes to reallocate the maximum unit sizes and remove the overall 27,500 sq. ft floor area cap. An analysis of these figures is provided below. [Continued on following page] .,. Table 1. Approved vs Proposed Dimensions Approved Dimensions Current Floor Area Proposed Floor Area Net Change Unit 1 2,500 sq. ft. 2,943 sf 2,943 sf 443 sf Unit 2 2,500 sq. ft. 2,112 sf 2,500 sf 0 sf Unit 3 2,500 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. 1,836 sq. ft. -664 sq. ft. Unit 4 2,500 sq. ft. 2,116 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 5 2,500 sq. ft. 1,723 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 6 2,500 sq. ft. 1,786 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 7 2,500 sq. ft. 1,764 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 8 2,500 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. 1,791 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 9 2,500 sq. ft. 2,212 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Unit 10 2,500 sq. ft. 3,154 sq. ft. 3,154 sq. ft. 654 sq. ft. Unit 11 2,500 sq. ft. 2,904 sq. ft. 2,904 sf sq. ft. 404 sq. ft. Total 27,500 sq. ft. 24,341 27,628 128 sq. ft. Staff supports the removal of the bedroom requirement because it is based on a method of affordable housing mitigation that is no longer required under today's Code. Staff does support the redistribution of floor area between the existing units; however, does not feel that increasing the allowed floor area to the lot achieves a significant community goal. Staff finds this criterion is not met. E. Design Standards. The design of the proposed development is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 1. The design complies with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. 2. The proposed materials are compatible with those called for in any applicable design standards, as well as those typically seen in the immediate vicinity. Exterior materials are finalized during Detailed Review, but review boards may set forth certain expectations or conditions related to architectural character and exterior materials during Project Review. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time; therefore, there is no proposed design changes to review. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. F. Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any vehicular access points, or curb cuts, minimize impacts on existing or proposed pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. The City may require specific `W designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. G. Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the project to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 — Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Sta finds this criterion is not applicable. H. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. The City Engineer may require specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines be defined as part of the Detailed Review and documented within a Development Agreement. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. I. Access and Circulation. The proposed development shall have perpetual unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. A proposed Planned Development shall not eliminate or obstruct legal access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Planned Development retained under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited. Staff Findings: The Applicant is not proposing any additional development at this time. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. #S `. 14000 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Z( 20_M0 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, $CnX L n tTVV MCI'tOIV (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials'which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and. which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Alailing. of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. gnature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledgel before me this day of� sni0 0 20A_(p,b. �h y11Y1('�ov� NOTICE OF PUBLIC X JUING RE: La s a tM BSPa^ fisstlosra PWxrtl Or vebpnra ar,d BledlvNbn Public Nasal Mansur September 26, 2016, 5 00 Nsetl LocaBs: CM Hall, Council Chambers 130 S. Goa. St: Aspen, CC, 81611 Project Location: Aspen Meadows Townhomes, 11-111 Meadows Road L,eIDescdpdon:PlD e: 273512239001, 273512239002. 273512239003, 2735122390N. 273512239005, 273612239006, 273512239007, 27351223900 , 273512239009.273512239010, 273512239011 & 273512239800; 1.9.11yy tle- scribed as: Lot 5 of The Aspen Meadows Subdivi- sion, CM of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of C010- .W. Deurlphis:TM1e Aspen Meadows HOA requests an amendment to increase the floor area require- ments, eliminate bedroom limitations and remove the overall floor area cap of the Trustee Townho- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: VAXJ , M Notary Public KAREN REED PATTERSON NOTARY PUSLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY 1D #141964002767 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: My Commission Expires Fem uary 15, 2020 rREPUBLICATION ?A PH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) HE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED VT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE Published in the Aspen Times on September 8. RED BY C R.S ,(24-65.5-103.3 360 2016 I12201) J' AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CODE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEAPINGIDATE:0422?40L ' _ d STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, � Wyl U05) L'- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice. By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof Materials, which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of 20, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto: Mailing of notice. By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of The Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, To affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. the names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivision, Spas or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Development, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notices requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, to whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other significant legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real estate property in the ears of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. The foregoing "Affidavit Notice' was acknowledged before me this uo day , 20 ! 2 , by of � YT �St/l t Cz5 f{ ALYSON CECILIA GISH NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY 10 R 20134023851 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 17 2017 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: i�✓ ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICES (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICED AS REQIURES BY C.R.S §24-65.5-103.3 ... THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: Lot 5 of the Aspen Meadows Planned Development and Subdivision Public Hearing: Monday September 26, 2016, 5:00 pm Meeting Location: City Hall, Council Chambers, 130 S. Galena St. Aspen CO 81611 Project Location: Aspen Meadows Townhomes, 11-111 Meadows Road PID #: 273512239001, 273512239002, 273512239003, 273512239004, 273512239005, 273512239006, 273512239007, 273512239008, 273512239009, 273512239010, 273512239011 & 273512239800; legally described as: Lot 5 of The Aspen Meadows Subdivision, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Description: The Aspen Meadows HOA requests an amendment to increase the floor area requirements, eliminate bedroom limitations and remove the overall floor area cap of the Trustee Townhomes. Land Use Reviews Requested: Planned development — Project Review. City Council's Project Review addresses land uses, mass, scale, height, floor area, site planning and other major aspects of the proposal. City Council's action is by ordinance and is binding. Decision Making Body: City Council Applicant: Aspen Meadows Townhomes HOA 71 Meadows Road Aspen CO 81811, 970.379.2595 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Hillary Seminick at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, 970.429.2741, HillarySeminick@cityofapen.com. r.. law GURRENTZ FAMILY 2012 TRUST GURRENTZ SUSAN FAMILY TRUST LAVENDER A RAY REV TRUST 1501 ARDMORE BLVD #400 PO BOX V PO BOX 1935 PITTSBURGH, PA 15221 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 LAVENDER A RAY GST MARITAL TRST LAVENDER ROSEMARIE 2015 QPRT MORROW DARRELL C PO BOX 1935 PO BOX 1935 1120 BLACK BIRCH DR ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDSMITH BARBARA L TRUST CERISE JAMES M BARABE CAROLYN 733 25TH ST 790 CASTLE CREEK DR 790 CASTLE CREEK DR SANTA MONICA, CA 90402-3143 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOFFMAN LARRY J & DEBORAH GANTZEL STEEN GIFFORD QPRT GANTZEL JOAN IVERS QPRT 3525 BAYSHORE VILLAS DR 705 MEADOWS RD 705 MEADOWS RD MIAMI, FL 33133 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DEMPSEY 1996 REV TRUST BEAR ALLEY LLC WESTVIEW HOLDINGS LLC 2430 BROADWAY ST 1040 ANNA KNAPP BLVD 303 PEARL PKWY #300 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 MOUNT PLEASANT, SC 29464 SAN ANTONIO, TX 782151285 ELLIOTT ELYSE A TRUST 817 WEST NORTH STREET LLC SCHWAB ROBERT AND LOUISE FAMILY TRU 610 NORTH ST 2542 EMMA RD 10940 WILSHIRE BLVD #2250 ASPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 PITKIN WAY ENTERPRISES LLC SAUSSUS GUY & MARTINE 20 % SAUSSUS PATRICK T 80% 401 N MICHIGAN AVE #3200 3015 BRYAN ST #3A 8576 E MINERAL CIR CHICAGO, IL 60611 DALLAS, TX 75204 CENTENNIAL, CO 80112 CHARLES TIMOTHY JOHN LAFIELD ASPEN VENTURES LLC CK PITCO ASSOCIATES LLC 1195 BLACK BIRCH DR 6605 FORESTSHIRE DR COZEN O'CONNOR ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS, TX 75230 1650 MARKET ST #2800 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 WING KAREN FAM LTD PTNSHP HANSEN SALLY WRIGLEY WILLIAM JR RES TRST ONE INT'L PL 44TH FL PO BOX 9343 401 N MICHIGAN AVE #3200 BOSTON, MA 021102602 ASPEN, CO 81612 CHICAGO, IL 606114207 ASPEN ENDEAVORS LLC BOOTH OTIS RES TRUST 618 SMUGGLER LLC 401 N MICHIGAN AVE #3200 10431 BELLAGIO RD 4212 BELCLAIRE CHICAGO, IL 606114207 LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 DALLAS, TX 75205 ... 4ww LPRP RIVER LLC LPRP MILL LLC SCHEFLER ARNO D 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR PO BOX 1005 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SPIRITAS A/K 1991 TRUST UKRAINE LINDA W REV TRUST RABINOW RICHARD A 2900 N FITZHUGH #200 PO BOX 10844 3711 SAN FELIPE #12-1 DALLAS, TX 75204-3204 ASPEN, CO 81612 HOUSTON, TX 77027 RABINOW KATHRYN L E AULD ROBERT H & CAROL C SCHAEFER WIDO LIVING TRUST 3711 SAN FELIPE #12-1 730 W SMUGGLER AVE 603 W NORTH ST #1 HOUSTON, TX 77027 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDSMITH JOHN & BARBARA L BART QUAL PER RES TRST FAUQUET LLC 733 25TH ST 601 POYDRAS ST FL24 1033 SKOKIE BLVD #605 SANTA MONICA, CA 90402-3143 NEW ORLEANS, LA 701306036 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 FELDER RICHARD & DEBORAH LIV TRUST BAIRD STEPHEN W & SUSAN MERRITT JOHNSON CHRISTOPHER W 7378 E DEL ACERO DR 120 S LASALLE ST 834 5TH AVE #11B SCOTTSDALE, AZ 852582088 CHICAGO, IL 60603 NEW YORK, NY 10065 MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC CITY OF ASPEN HOLMES AUDREY P 225 MUSIC SCHOOL RD 130 S GALENA ST 660 MEADOWS RD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 650 MEADOWS ROAD LLC 630 MEADOWS COLORADO TRUST ASPEN INSTITUTE INC 101 FIRST ST #508 222 N LASALLE ST #800 1000 N THIRD ST LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CHICAGO, IL 60601 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH RED BUTTE CEMETERY ASPEN CENTER FOR PHYSICS 536 W NORTH ST PO BOX 194 700 E GILLESPIE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 600 NORTH STREET LLC MARKALUNAS JAMES J & RAMONA I MORRIS JOHN S JR 1427 CLARKVIEW RD #500 624 W NORTH ST PO BOX 8991 BALTIMORE, MD 21209 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 MUSGRAVE MARJORY M F430 LLC FALENDER STEVEN & DEBRA 629 W NORTH ST 51 WINDING BROOK DR 603 W GILLESPIE ST ASPEN, CO 81611 SARATOGA SPGS, NY 12866 ASPEN, CO 81611 14W Now UHLFELDER NAOMI BLACKWELL CLARENCE A & ANNE H ANTHONY JULIE KATHLEEN 111 EMERSON ST #1841 635 W GILLESPIE 655 MEADOWS RD DENVER, CO 802183792 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LPRP RIVER II LLC HERNANDEZ LORENE M CAMPBELL MICHAEL 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR 1479 DELGANY ST #3 1479 DELGANY ST #3 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80202 DENVER, CO 80222 GOLDRICH MELINDA REV TRUST ROWLAND JOHN G BROUGHTON SARAH 825 W NORTH ST 234 E HOPKINS AVE PO BOX 552 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 515 GILLESPIE LLC 675 MEADOWS RD LLC HUDSON FRASHER ANN PO BOX 10129 0124 TOTTERDOWN RD 616 TEXAS ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 LPRP RIVER III LLC RANSFORD SARA P SCHULTZ ROBERT J TRUST 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR 1150 RIVER DR 1140 BLACK BIRCH DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDSBURY CHRISTOPHER JR REV TRUST ROUSH G JAMES REV TRUST BASECAMP LLC 303 PEARL PKWY #300 2441 EVERGREEN POINT RD 4049 PENNSYLVANIA AVE #400 SAN ANTONIO, TX 782151285 MEDINA, WA 98039 KANSAS CITY, MO 64111 AML INVESTMENT II LLC WOOD DUCK REALTY CORP LAUDER LEONARD A REV TRUST 430 PARKSON RD 450 PARK AVE 3RD FL 767 FIFTH AVE 40TH FL HENDERSON, NV 89015 NEW YORK, NY 10022 NEW YORK, NY 10153 LAUDER WILLIAM MARCUS STEPHEN J WURTELE CHRISTOPHER C TRUST 767 5TH AVE 40TH FL PO BOX 1709 38 MEHA PL NEW YORK, NY 10153 ASPEN, CO 81612 PAIA, HI 967799738 ASPEN 805 LLC 614 ASPEN LLC COLLINS CHARLES & JANICE S 44 COOK ST #200 501 MORRISON RD #100 531 W GILLESPIE ST DENVER, CO 80206 GAHANNA, OH 43230 ASPEN, CO 81611 DURAND LOYAL III DR & BERNICE BLACK FRAZER WILLIAM & JANE TRST D STREET PARTNERS LLC 415 PEARL CT 433 W GILLESPIE PO BOX 10703 ASPEN, CO 816111256 ASPEN, CO 81611 MIDLAND, TX 79702 ... I-W ODOM JOHN A JR FAMILY TRUST ODOM LORRIE FURMAN FAM TRST PINES DAVID & ARONELLE TRST 11490 W 38TH AVE 11490 W 38TH AVE PO BOX 576 WHEATRIDGE, CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 TESUQUE, NM 87574 CRAIG CAROL G SALTER JAMES SALTER KATHLEEN ANNE ELDREDGE 707 N 3RD ST 500 W NORTH ST 500 W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816111253 PETERSON JAMES D & HENSLEY R 701 N THIRD ST LLC 619 N FOURTH STREET LLC PO BOX 1714 400 E HYMAN AVE #A202 PO BOX 1307 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN RESIDENCE HOLDINGS LLC CURTIS JAMES L REV TRUST HARRIS JOAN W TRUSTS 132 W DIAMOND A RANCH RD 300 E HYMAN AVE 209 E LAKE SHORE DR CARBONDALE, CO 81623 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60611 WALDECK VIVIAN G VANDERAA GILBERT T III KOLBE EMILY E 915 W NORTH ST 205 S MILL ST #226 205 S MILL ST #226 ASPEN. CO 81611-1171 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MONTENEGRO GRACE LLC POWELL WILLIAM E TRUST SHAMBAN AVA T L EXEMPT TRUST 655 THIRD AVE 21 ST FL 11 LYNN BATTS LN #100 790 RANCH LN NEW YORK, NY 10017 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78218 PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272 NEW WEISMAN FAMILY LP METCALF F MEAD REV TRUST CHASE SARAH COLGATE 1566 RISING GLEN RD PO BOX 32 319 TANO RD LOS ANGELES, CA 900691226 ASPEN, CO 81612 SANTA FE, NM 87506 BERG AMY MARGERUM BERGER BRUCE C OPRT #2 BERGER BARBARA OPRT #2 622 W SMUGGLER ST 600 E HOPKINS AVE #202 600 E HOPKINS AVE #202 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BERGER BRUCE C QPRT #1 BERGER BARBARA OPRT #1 SHIELDS PATRICIA P & JOHN II 600 E HOPKINS AVE #202 600 E HOPKINS AVE #202 1077 PONTE VEDRA BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL 32082 CAD ASPEN LLC GILLESPIE LLC PARELMAN ALLEN G REV TRUST 710 N 3RD ST 191 N WACKER DR #1800 734 W SMUGGLER ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60606 ASPEN, CO 81611 BECKLEY JOHN & MARY ANN DAVIES FREDRIC & FRANCES REISS JAMES J & PRISCILLA 16818 FALLS RD PO BOX K 601 POYDRAS ST #1630 UPPERCO, MD 21155 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW ORLEANS. LA 70130 PITKIN COUNTY SMOOKE BARRY ASPEN TRUST SMOOKE JULIE ASPEN TRUST 530 E MAIN ST #302 155 5TH ANITA DR 155 5TH ANITA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 SMITH VICTORIA LEA REED PRESLEY FAMILY TRUST MCHUGH JOHN J & RICK[ L 1160 PARK AVE 999 18TH ST #1745 PO BOX 7954 NEW YORK, NY 10128 DENVER, CO 80202 ASPEN, CO 81612 NSF 1976 INVESTMENTS LLC SARPA JOHN G & JAN JONES SHERMAN HARRIS D 4237 DEL MAR AVE 71 MEADOWS TRUSTEE RD 5401 E DAKOTA #20 CARPINTERIA, CA 93013 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80246 LAMM RICHARD D OPRT BLUEFIELD REAL ESTATE TRUST STRICKLAND MARCIA D 5401 E DAKOTA #20 599 LEXINGTON AVE 1991 E ALAMEDA AVE #9 DENVER, CO 80246 NEW YORK, NY 10022 DENVER, CO 80209 RIVER ONE LLC 335 LAKE AVE LLC LAKE AVENUE LAND LLC 400 E MAIN ST STE 2 715 W MAIN ST #101 3580 CARMEL MTN RD #460 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN DIEGO, CA 92130 TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT ASPEN MEADOV PITKIN RESERVE OWNERS ASSOC TREEHOUSE CONDO ASSOC 11 MEADOWS RD COMMON AREA COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 44 - 64 PITKIN WY 822 W SMUGGLER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASEPN, CO 81611 ROME GIK CONDO ASSOC KANDAHAR CONDO ASSOC LBH CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 617 N FOURTH ST W NORTH ST 521 N SEVENTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MARTIN CONDO ASSOC MEADOW WATCH CONDO ASSOC NOVE 1 DUPLEX CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 W SMUGGLER 637 W NORTH ST ASPEN. CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 OLIVER CARR CONDO ASSOC 8TH ONE LLC BRUMLEY JONNY S & LORI F COMMON AREA 901 RIO GRANDE #100 901 HILLCREST ST 618 W SMUGGLER ST AUSTIN, TX 78701 FORT WORTH, TX 76107 ASPEN, CO 81611 Lom MEADOWS NORTH LLC 675 MEADOWS RD CHAMBERS BAY LLC 2180 SAND HILL RD #345 MENLO PARK, CA 94025 BLACK BIRCH ESTATES LLC 6925 HILL FOREST DR DALLAS, TX 75230 MG DUPLEX LLC 825 W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ROADSEND LLC 6643 N 66TH PLACE PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 637 W NORTH STREET TRUST 279 JUNE RD STAMFORD, CT 06903 T AND J LLC 327 SNUG HARBOR RD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 FIVE RULES HOLDINGS PROPERTY 1 LTD LEVEL 9 148 QUAY ST AUCKLAND NEW ZEALAND 1010, ZODIAC ASPEN LLC 1917 S SIGNAL RD #101 PMB #187 MESA, AZ 85209 Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 6.:aC) :!'R L.C. :1rA SiT P 2Cj:16 f-'M :1. '1"' NOVE 1 DUPLEX CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 637 W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 usR fo F EVEN S::'F�Svh jF :';�Y i"F Z.liY.Y[6112i'D is c.� �'✓r.au-.'..':.qq$y$y'.'Y¢¢a�-�.LL�.� 'xp�.yy'� XCX.F.F.'�55: Av �AA^4:. p�r"Iy—'�;w n iL �tl1�Y.31.� 11N R�p11p� �iR�9l�A�I1�E�11G��V9190i1�pi�6�9d L���IOvll�fi�tl 4�9�1��y ' r��.it•7,.,=tCdt";:. 7t:; `;:'s�4 t.:"E'Z��:{v t,`:t�� :.1.!:� •r L•Z. 2 /a ;roCA t fc, E^. s ..r OLIVER CARR CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA 618 W SMUGGLER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ,:4lIN/+n+�T.Ab ,fNYiw'e,4v:,� , Y+..N�y�',n'hlnulnn.,,IIA Of1FOR�EVEN r, I� AAI'tm2 Si T?N L: wV WZi�i1 I g1.fiL1y.9ez3e "1.979-0821Y645-1D-S2 iEI l @u'# ei Eali9 7�g l�� llxe.l�i! ll�l !Aun I � 1 11 � Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 t�i'i::'•"•��i`d i�::� ..a �aP'•1 VF,"(";[c..:;'�P'd ��.f.;;F ;Cit a_.::i ict s F F` t t.if5. F"P i :L {_ MEADOW WATCH CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA W SMUGGLER ASPEN, CO 81611 Y � V '.: VS<FYPEVER 1AFQ .l3S/1. F TZ9 "T'31t tii Yil?'TB � IA- q� 10 SE:P 2016 PM 1 L V SI FO P EVE0. TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT ASPEN MEADON 11 MEADOWS RD ASPEN, CO 81611 1T 7,� JA'P 1. :'c TSd' @F 57L Li' 47t'7"1 _I{A g.� nN.w..ny.yg n"y..r3.S_px. 5w.iiupp 4iYyv "'.gig"ge-. 3q lS Et p-I-p d:.'gEbi- �r'S. Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 KANDAHAR CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 +1�51411 IL�il�l i, I.IC30"l 41 NIXIE 808 SE 1 RETURN TO SENDER UNABLE TO FORWARD V SA FOPEVE0. 0009;18'i6 IA BC: 8161119OZ30 *1979-23095-10-41 2 i11iIIlli"Ili1lililiIIIILjIIIljiIji'!I!11Iifilll'I'illii,i,j]li PrrKIN RESERVE OWNERS ASSOC COMMON AREA 44 - 64 PITKIN WY ASPEN, CO 81611 USA F0 F EV EF ?JZ_ 11 -A -- RETURN TO SEEDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD VAC BC: 81611190230 *1979-23090-10-41 Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 E r".ii''rrrl....lC.tldt.�.tr:rir•r r..', nlu. �Vou:. •m mm IO SS Fa RE V ER MARTIN CONDO ASSOC COMMON AREA ASPEN, CO 81611 NT XTR 808 SF 1 G1 GfnGi':A RETURN TO SENDER • . -iNAHLE TO FOPWAPD SC: 81611190230 *1979-00181-10-42 III 'i'liiiijliiijiiliiiiFJill IIliiilll11111lilliii'IiIfI' Ijlf'I1 x:_F>;c,:.s,ND 12': -1 :i,:l.. . FAUQUET LLC 1033 SKOKIE BLVD #605 NORTHBROOK, IL 60062 u sAFRREVER NIXIE 600 7E 1 0009/18;16 RETURN TO SENDER NOT ' y� ERABLE AS ADDRESSED DELIVERABLE TO FORWARD F t ,LTF 111, tT%02 3C: 81611190230 *1979-06510-10-42 '1111';1'ullls'�;'i+l�"'ii'1�iillP'llilifll'111Enifll�iNl11' Community Development Department :!!tl ."•.I'i I_ • alw.ti`•! .1':L' si'd 4 a 1 31.'5 130 South Galena Street °" Aspen, CO 81611 to, 'r USA f OR EV ER PO BOX 552/ ASPEN,C 81612 / M1- $RH iF-9 N6YAGi^_3!in RETURN TO SENDER —�''r'-- " �aNAR1 P VTn POR WARn3::E': i EC: 81611190230 *1979-06190-10-42 81611>1902 Jill! illlliliili'llillil'li�lll'fill'Iilillihilhilllli� i,IIL r• =r,w .ir ... u., M Community Development De ry .........:w,.,. 130 South Galena Street ;tt ; '•;te I? 2.ki,t t: twt _t T Nw k. Aspen, C081611 •-� �� t \ VSI FYRFV ER 516 GILLESPIE LLC PO BOX 10129 ASPEN, CO 81612 14T-x RA 7r 1_ RPeAG, RETURN TO SENDER j U NABLE VTO FORWARD i I SC: 81611190230 *1979-02475-19-4Z c$gk43t>�i 62P0i 'IIIIiIIIIiii11-IIijiliytiiIIII iitiilllll1011i111il'ililii(4i Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 `1 Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 :iC1 SF. F^:"L11ii. i'MI 1 i' BLUEFIELD REAL ESTATE TRUST 599 LEXINGTON AVE NEW YORK, NY 10022 �iX, v V4�Vq�1111X X,> �� III .,n n r USI FO PEV EP�� Ni Xi 101 7E 1 0094%Z0%16 RETURN TO SENDER i NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD I UTF SC: 81611190230 *1979-Z3110-10-41 ' 81611>l9ez IllllElilEI�IIIIIL:I�I�1�11�"1�`I11"I'i�'I��IE�L,::�il{'�I�I� UbAFUPEVEP 618 SMUGGLER LLC 4212 BELCLAIRE DALLAS, TX 75205 758 7-c 1 0809/22"16 RETURN TO -SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN JHNA:E__ ED FORWARD 'ANK 'kl-.: 81e111.3-Ltl7,31h =-iGTv=RrttiRi_tp-4c ?�>fSrESB �sez Ildil,ij,,, it, Ili 1„1,1111lillflIli Jill I,++1111'Iillll'�`Pil��l 71� 1A 4L . 14.1 All shy , rvTA -pspsi C Jt 40N tow Aspen Institute Trustee Houses Floor Area Analysis April9, 2016 Original SPA Current Floor Proposed Increase or (decrease) Floor Area Area Floor Area from SPA Unit 1 2,500 sf 2,943 sf 2,943 sf 443 sf Unit 2 2,500 sf 2,112 sf 2,500 sf 0 sf Unit 3 2,500 sf 1,836 sf 1,836 sf -664 sf Unit 4 2,500 sf 2,116 sf 2,500 sf 0 sf Unit 5 2,500 sf 1,723 sf 2,500 sf 0 sf Unit 6 2,500 sf 1,786 sf 2,500 sf 0 sf Unit 7 2,500 sf 1,764 sf 2,500 sf 0 sf Unit 8 2,500 sf 1,791 sf 1,791 sf -709 sf Unit 9 2,500 sf 2,212 sf 2,500 sf 0 sf Unit 10 2,500 sf 3,154 sf 3,154 sf 654 sf Unit 11 2,500 sf 2,904 sf 2,904 sf 404 sf Total 27,500 sf 24,341 sf 27,628 sf 128 sf low NW Hillary Seminick From: Hillary Seminick Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 6:39 PM To: 'Kim Weil' Subject: Aspen Meadows Townhomes Greetings Kim, I had the opportunity to bring this case to staff last Thursday. My apologies for the delay in getting this information to you, I was out of town the past few days. Staff provided the following comments: • Staff is supportive of the reallocation of floor area; however, the allocation shall be within the current allowed floor area cap of 27,500 sf • Staff is supportive of removing the floor area cap provided the reallocation of floor area is equal to the existing cap of 27,500 sf • Staff is supportive continuing to allow the PD to enjoy the 500 sf of exempt garage space I am happy to discuss Staff recommendations further with you when we're both in the office. Thank you! Hillary Hillary Seminick Planner I Community Development Department City of Aspen 1 130 S Galena St I Aspen, CO 81611 970.429.2741 1 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable. the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. ~aw pOSS ARCHITECTURE -PLANNING January 22, 2016 Sara Nadolny City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Amendment to Aspen Meadows SPA as it Relates to the Trustee Houses Dear Sara, The HOA of the Trustee Townhomes at the Aspen Meadows would like to request an amendment to 'The Aspen Meadows" Specially Planned Area Development & Subdivision Agreement. Specifically, this request is to amend paragraph II E of the agreement. Background Lot 5 of the Aspen Meadows development contains 11 townhouses collectively referred to as the Trustee Houses. Eight of these townhouses were constructed in the 1960's as part of the original Aspen Institute. The other three townhomes were constructed in the early 1990's as a result of the approval of the SPA. Paragraph II E of the subdivision agreement deals with the allowed floor area and bedroom counts for the Trustee Houses. The HOA is proposing to amend this paragraph to address both the allowed floor area and allowed bedroom count. A discussion of both of these items follows below. Floor Area The Aspen Meadows Development and Subdivision Agreement states that each of the eleven Trustee Houses is allowed 2,500 square feet of floor area calculated using the method in place at the time of the approval for the first three years and using the method in place at the time of permit submittal thereafter. In addition, the aggregate area for all 11 units was set at 27,500. Due to the existing conditions on the property and changes to the methodology of calculating floor area, the HOA is requesting some adjustments to the allowed floor area requirements. Currently, all of the original 8 units are under the 2,500 square foot floor area limit while the newer three units constructed in the early 1990's are all over the 2,500 square foot limit. A table listing the floor area of each unit calculated using the methodology currently in place appears in Table 1 below. Table 1- Existing Floor of Trustee Houses (calculated to the nearest sf.) Unit 1(newer unit) 2,943 sf. Unit 2 (original unit) 2,112 sf, Unit 3 (original unit) 1,836 sf. Unit 4 (original unit) 2,116 sf. Unit 5 (original unit) 1,723 sf, M EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 In 9701925-4155 M 970/920-2950 WWII[ LPOSS.COM pOSS ARCHITECTURE-1-PLANNING Unit 6 (original unit) 1,786 sf.• Unit 7 (original unit) 1,764 sC Unit 8 (original unit) 1,791 sf. Unit 9 (original unit) 2,212 sf. Unit 10 (newer unit) 3,154 sf. Unit 11(newer unit) 2,904 sf. Total for all 11Units 24,341 sf. ' Unit 6 has a building permit in place to expand the floor area to 1,920 sf. by adding a basement. Construction work began in January 2016 with completion scheduled for the spring of 2017. Two factors can be used to explain the fact that the three newer townhomes are over the 2,500 sf. limit set forth in the Spa Agreement. First, the methodology for calculating floor area has changed over the approximately 23 years since they were constructed. In particular, the rules pertaining to garage space and below grade space have become more restrictive. It is not unusual for structures built before 2000 to have floor areas greater than would be allowed under the land use code today. The second reason for the overage of the newer townhomes arises from the fact that during the design process for the newer units, unit 3 and unit 8 signed their additional floor area over to the developer of the newer units. The building permit plans for these newer units were reviewed by the zoning and building departments and building permits were Issued. The issue of the 2,500 sf maximum for an individual unit apparently never came up during the review process. The proposal we would like to put forward with respect to floor area is an attempt to update the SPA approval so that it is more in keeping with current land use codes. Specifically, we are proposing Table 2 below as a way to redistribute the floor area among the Trustee Houses. Table 2 — Redistributed Floor of Trustee Houses Unit 1(newer unit) 3,154 sf. Unit 2 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 3 (original unit) 1,850 sf. Unit 4 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 5 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 6 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 7 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 8 (original unit) 1,850 sf. Unit 9 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 10 (newer unit) 3,154 sf. Unit 11(newer unit) 3.154 sf. Total for all 11 Units 28,150 sf. NNW pOSS ARCHITECTURE -PLANNING The above table above effectively bridges the gap between the time of the original approval and today's land use code. It preserves the 2,500 square feet for the original units that did not assign their floor area while effectively sterilizing units 3 and 8 from future development. With respect to the newer units, the floor area is set at the limit of the largest existing unit. As you will notice the cumulative total for this proposal of 28,150 sf. is greater than the 27,500 sf. called for in the SPA agreement by 650 sf. We would argue that this increase is easily explained by the more restrictive rules regarding garages and below grade space. For instance, in 1993, below grade space was exempt if less than 10% of the wall area of a below grade space was exposed. Currently, below grade space begins to count against floor area as soon as any amount of wall is exposed. In addition to redistributing the floor as outlined in Table 2 above, we are making two additional requests with respect to floor area. First, since the original SPA agreement called for a 500 square foot exemption for carports and each of the original units has a carport of approximately this size and each of the newer units has a two car garage of this size, we would request that the 500 square foot exemption remain in place for this project. By allowing the garage floor area exemption to remain at 500 square feet, you eliminate the possibility of a unit becoming non- conforming simply because of the existing garage or carport. Secondly, we would request that the overall cumulative total requirement be removed from the approval. Since each of the 11 units is owned by an individual, it is an undue burden to expect each owner to calculate the floor area for the entire complex simply to remodel their individual unit. As has been pointed out, floor area calculation methodology is subject to changes over time and keeping a cumulative total requirement seems to make little sense as long as each individual unit conforms to the proposed redistributed floor area in Table 2 at the time of building permit submittal. Number of Bedrooms The original SPA limited the number of bedrooms to 3 per unit. This limit was tied to the affordable housing mitigation requirements at the time of the approval. We are asking to have the limit removed. This removal makes sense because currently, mitigation for affordable housing for individual residential permits is based on square footage of a residence and not the number of bedrooms. Since any redevelopment of a unit with the Trustee Houses development will be put forth by an individual owner, we are proposing that each unit satisfy the Growth Management regulations in place at the time of building permit submittal. In this way, the underlying reasons for the three bedroom limit is still addressed and the Growth Management regulations will be satisfied. Protect Review Standards The following paragraphs address the review standards of Section 26.445.050 of the land use code. A. Compliance with Adopted Regulatory Plans. The proposed development complies with applicable regulatory plans. Name ., pOSS ARCHITECTURE.1-PLANNING Response. The intent of this request is to bring the SPA agreement into closer compliance with current land use policies. Older approvals such the Meadows SPA are often in conflict with current land use codes. The intent is to clarify the issue of floor area and subject any expansion of the individual units to current Growth Mitigation requirements. With respect to floor area the assignment of some floor area from two of the original units to the three newer units is made clear by this agreement. Any expansion of an individual unit will be subject to the Growth Mitigation requirements in place at the time of building permit. B. Development Suitability. The proposed Planned Development prohibits development on land unsuitable for development. Response. No direct development is requested as part of this amendment. Rather, as a result of this amendment, relatively modest expansion of the existing individual units may be proposed in the future. As individual units are submitted for building permit, they will be subject to the standards affecting site suitability including any required mitigation. C. Site Planning. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. Response. No direct development is proposed as part of this amendment. With limited ability for each unit to expand, it is hard to believe that any proposed expansion would impact the overall context or visual character of the neighborhood. In addition, any expansion of these units is subject to review by the Historic Preservation Commission whose guidelines clearly control the design of any expansion including the site plan. D. Dimensional Requirements. All dimensions, including density, mass, and height shall be established during the Project Review. Response. The SPA agreement for the Meadows did establish dimensional requirements for the Trustee Houses. The purpose of this amendment is to update and clarify some of those standards to make then more compatible with the current land use code. We feel the requests outlined earlier in this letter are in keeping with the overall intent of the original approval. The original approval contemplated the expansion of the original units. This amendment request clarifies some of the issues related to past construction on the property. It effectively sterilizes three of the units (3, 8, and 10) from future expansion and severely limits two others (1 and 11). The other six, all original units, can expand in the same way that was contemplated in the original approval. Each unit already has two off-street parking places. In addition, there is dedicated guest parking for the Trustee Houses adjacent to the property. No request for variances is being made. E. Design Standards. The design of the proposed development is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. Response. The Trustee Houses parcel is on the city's historic inventory. As such, and development on the parcel is subject to review by the Historic Preservation committee and '%W 14. pOSS ARCHITECTURP-PLANNING conformance with their guidelines in effect at the time of the review. As you are aware, these guidelines cover all aspects of a proposed development including site planning, massing, and materials. F. Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. Response. All of these features currently exist as part of the overall Meadows complex. To the extent that an individual building permit requests requires Growth Management mitigation with respect to any of these elements, it will be dealt with at the time of such permit submittal. G. Engineering Design Standards. There has been an accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the project to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 — Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan. Response. This proposal does not require addressing of these standards. However, as individual building permit requests are put forward they will address these standards as they exist at the time of the building permit. H. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities as necessary to serve the project. Response. No upgrades to public facilities are required as part of this amendment request. In addition, it is unlikely that any of the modest expansions that may come about in future will lead to any required upgrades. I. Access and Circulation. The proposed development shall have perpetual and unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. Response. The Meadows and the Trustee Homes currently meet this standard. No change is proposed. Any future expansion of an individual will also not change the current access patterns. In summary, we feel this is a very simple and reasonable request. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, BiIIVQss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. 0 Lrce�o nn�srn _-s l Nl- 11 f` I I p14 uN.T u.sm onuxrW nw. ��0. II �•y��,hS��;.l„ R / % / aR �/ nn Paz e.s acry a.mEry as.au,.rv�xu ae lmm.'1 NlT 9 I I � eNo E I r I I el �uwro R ' A t 4 UNIT 5� 1 1 I 1 1 u ILf uNITTW4 1 3 1 1 � \ ul°II °y,r \ it 4 tea, 11 UNITN42 \ OV k ASPEN SURO'F\' pGl ALiRS, ISC xa�a 1 �oxEn.. Iorol au �a�a V 0340937 01 /24/92 1[+: 13 Fec 5400.00 9R 667 PO 73b: Silvia Davis, Pi LY.tn Cney Clerk, Doc $.00 F„•' requirements for form and content above set forth. Any such substitution shall L. be subject to the prior approval of the City Attorney in his determination. t � sr• { 3. TI4{IS : n t The Final Flat depicts a troll tasestushl across the Physics Property from Gillespie Street to the ram track trail on. Lot 1. Physics and the City agree that this trail easement is not to be paved. Physics is granting this easement but has no • financial obligation of any kind for the trail or my related work, • ..�• D. I,OT b - (fJ4SERVATION LAND: Lot 4 Is to bo sold by Savanah to the City of Aspen for the purpose of open space. Lot' .• t r�. J' ?t�y'��'lx.s. 4'shall be zoned Wildlife Preservation (WP). It Is the Intention of this zone district that s• this Property remain open with a trail system and appropriate bridge connections to the 17. Rio Grande Trail. Neither the Consortium nor any of its Individual members thereof shall have any rdponsiblllly whalsoever for Ibe conslnction, installallon or maimerance of any trail or other roerealional facilities to be inomponted into Lot 4. Exact trail locations must be approved by phe Planning Director giving priority to those alignmems which minimize damage or dismpdon to existing vegetation and landscape and which subordinate gtMe considerations and, thus, minimize switchbacks, to preservation of existing topography i i. Alie improvement (a) Utilities. The Final Plat shows utility line easements as existing and proposed tot electrical, gas, storm and sanitary sewer, and water. j . IA)T5 THR TRIISTEE H12USFC AT THE ASPEN NhIPADGMt Lot 5 is Sivaruh's Property and is zoned RMP according to end as sbowrl on the Plat. Existingdeveiopmenton Lots consists ofthC.GglltA1,1it 1, jiulisei, ach otap ioxlma1F21y7 . {1,750 k4rd'2at; conststtng of three bedrooms and two baths. Development has bran approved for an expansion and renovation of the existing trustee houses'ieal oerpsig kJ dthfee bedro`ia"Its of 2,s00'sgoaro feet of FAR'*h) In addition three new trustee ' •houses shall be developed on Lot s, one on the South end of the existing units and two on the North end of the exlsing unitsEach new unit will be 2,500 square feet of PAR .with three bedrooms Tool buiM•atoD t.45 "{ gon i o(se�s,ytJfSllp with thirty S, '• threebedroomaand m"44tAukv- iddlog na(0-904 tuarerW fl_ ���c�W!:s;ath�#���4f,� `:l{1�3�>MC� kt .• 22 P a; i t I 0-14.0937 01/24/92 16,13 Rqc $400.00 91, M 67 Pp. ? .6 A'?iS,-Fits,,I.n Cnky Clerk, Doc 4.00 9 a n e three new ide s have received an iltotmenI under the 0 and have received variations for setbacks, height and open space, as noted On the Flat and as described below. Dimmil2nal g2sluiroments end yjdahWttL3j=jjrom Ito following dimensional requirements arc for the RNIF ZOO District; vanallons In these requirements that have been granted for the development activity contemplated for Iot 5 we noted: a) Minimum lot size (sq, 11.); 6,000 b) Minimum lot a" per dwelling unit: l') 3 bedroom unit: 3,630 sq, ft. Minimum loi width: 60 - Prot d) Minimum front yard! Prifinkipal building: 10 fees it) Accessory 6LUdffl&: 15 Ices ow Odlk§W • dta. A variation from minimum RMF Zone District front yard setbacks for Accessory buildings has beers granted by the City to r. ZcM fat for Lot 5.) e) Minimum side yard: 5 feet j 1) Minimum far yard: 1) Principal building: 10 feel 11) Aootssory building: 15 feel '11 MWmum height;,: 01.01t. A dimensional height variation for the two northemm,,t trusloo houses has been grained by the City for Up IQ eight feet.) fi) Percent Of open space required for building site; 35% 23 0-WIP'. W.- 7. v 2. II . #340937 01/24/92 16,13 Rec $400.00 SK 667 PO 750 611,fa Davis, Pi_kkln Cnty CLerk, Doc 4.00 C=. hllnlmum RhlP7une DisidetopenspaurequiremenlshaVebcen walved by the City for Tut 51n considerattod of the open space otherwise provided IntheSPA development plan.) i). Exlerrwi FAR(marlmum): 1:1 j) Internal FAR: no zoquircm8nt k) Off-street parking requirementt 1 spaco per bedroom cyndomiall miration and Six Multi hlinimvm L � Rea d m nt Pursuant to findings made during the approval Process and in ate0rdance with Section 24-7.1007 of the Municipal Code, the City has granted and awarded condominiumiulion approval for all eleven units contemplated for Lot 5. Condominlumiration of the eight exisdog units is subject to payment of an affordable hosing impact fee according to Section 24.7.1007A(I)(c). The fee touts W,240 and shall be paid at t me of recordation of the condominium plat and declaration for theunits on Lot 5. The six monlhminimum lew requirement for condominium units as coniaWd at Section 24.7-1007 (A)(I)(b)(1) of the Municipal Code has been and hereby is waived m to all the condominium Units on Lot 5 as approved by this SPA plan. Site Improvenlol (a) Utilities. All telephone, electric and cable lints on the Property servicing the Improvements shall be undergummded. Ali water end sanitary sewer lines shall be designed and consirucled in accordance with standards of the City and of the ACSD and written easements will be provided if and as required confirming the m.built leealion of each easement. (b) LatMs po pmploXtruoll. Savanah shall abide by and subsianlialiy conform to the tree removal and landscape plans recorded as part of the Plat in Book 199. at Page .1-, a seq. of the Records. The landscape plans depict and describe the nature, extent and location of all plant materials in appropriate relation to scale, spccics and sire of oxisling plant material, Bower and shrub bed definition, a plant material schedule with common and botanical names, slur and quantilles, proposed treatment of all ground surfaces (e.g., Paving, (urf, gravel, terracing, etc.), decorative water features, retaining walls, fencing, benches, and all other agreed - upon landscape features. Such landscaping shall becompleted in a logical sequence commemunno with the staging of improvements as contemplated in the Lot 5 Consimcdon Schedule, but in no event later than one year 24 1 h Y "1 '1111111110 Soo INA"�VIIFIIM 'WWW Q. 0340937 01/24192 16)13 Raf, $400.00 OK 667 PG 759 811vi. Davi%, Pitkin Cnty Clark, Dee *-60 after the 4310 of Issuance of the cedificato of Occupancy for the final Phase of Imprevemems, it Is the mutual understanding of tho,partics; that cerofiCatosofCcetipanoy may In fact Issue for Improvements oven though '.C.r the landscaping improvements related thereto have not yet been complet- cd act long as [bat portion of the financial guaranty Provided for In this A�Qnilut, which covers the estimated cost of such unfinished landscap- ing remains available to the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. All tree, replacement shall boon aono-to-onecallpor Inch basis throughout tho Project as a whole with minimum size at 1 1/2' caliper. 4. no Plat depicts All ImUs dedicated or conveyed to Public use and all easements firibAS Off-StIC trails to the PMJWI'$ Wit System, including ilia trail easement between tho tennis townhouse and miatmint. Written easements shall be executed and conveyed after trail construction confirming [ham -built location of each easement. A portion of the trail Easement for the trail from Meadows Read to W 4 crosses Lot S. as depicted en the Plat. Trail construction on this IN Easement and any other appurtenant recreational facilities and amenities and landscaping Is The solo responsibility of the City of Aspen. Neither Savanah nor x. the Consortium shad have any financial responsibility for any of this work orfor the maintenance of any easements, 5. Financial Assurances In order to sectim, the construction of the site and landscape Improvements In Paragraphs 3(a)and (h)above and to&umm100 100% of the estimated cost ofItsuch Improvements, Savanah shall gumantoo by Irrevocable bond, sight draft or letter of commitment or cradit from a financially responsible lender that funds In the amount of such estimated *of, are held by It for the account or City for the construction and installation of the above-&scribcd improvements. As a condition for Issuance on _building permit for a portion or all of the renovation and now construction anticipated herein, Savanah and City shall agree on that portion of ths work outlined in Paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b) above reasonably necessary to complete the wo,•s for which a permit is being sought and the mutually agreed upon financial assurances shall be delivered to the City prior to Issuance of the Wilding permit, All I'manclid assurances given.by Savanah to City, In all events, shall give the City the unoWitiorut right, upon and following default by Samaho notice thereof by the city, and a forty day fight thereafter 10 cum, to withdraw funds as necessary cod upon demand to partially or fully complete and/or pay for any of such Improvements of pay any uncontested outstanding bills for work dow therew by any party, with any excess guaranty amount to be applied rimt.to ' additional administrative of legal costs associated with any such default Arji the repair ofany deterioration in Improvements already V 7 25 if a � rz V V 6. 834093-e 01/24/92 16413 Reg $400. 00 SK 667 PO 760 t411via Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Dac $.60 constructed befote the unused remainder (if any) of such guaranty is released to Savanah. As ponidns of the required improvements arc completed, the Public Works Direclorshall Inspect them, and upon approval and w»iten acceptance, he shall autbotlre tho releaso from the guaranty delivered by Savanah of die agreed^i. WImalalcost[or that Portion ofthc Improvements except that 10%of thoactual _.'sjiA" cost.Ofthe sit"flandscape Improvements shall borelalned until all proposed siteor landscape Improvements am completed and approved by the public Works (:;n Director. At anytime and from timmto time, Savanah shall have the right to substitute for . the form of financial assurance given, so long as such substituting form mcets the requimments for form and content above set forlh. Any such substitution shall be subject to the prior approval of City Attorney in his determination. .. pmnloyee Housing §ayanahand 1heLytyaclopwledgothat t1snim it"04,00oxppnslanoftheeight; EaNltFeft osa c>RAlaanYlmpldjMgLnikttl uFFIhsDPdciNs�S§o�Atiq gaCh:unit N rk savanah shah pay 10 t)so Chy an affordable housing midgation Impact he for 1,66low Income employees per unit for each of she three new residential units on W 5, in an alnotrnt fo be calculated pursuant to those fee guidelines 1n effect at the time the fee Is to be paid. The fee shallbepaid prior to the Issuance of the building permit for cent action of any new residential unit on Lot 5 and shall be paid in pmponion to the number of units sought to be permitted. and is zoned RMP according to astdtgshown on the Plat. ntial development on Lot ¢..-Approved under this plan is omo mills of throe bbcc�� cos end 2,500 souse feet of pAR- each. Total build out omiol consist f en units with twenty-one bedrooms and 17.500 square fat of PAR, exclud n consist (op to Soo square feel per dwelling unit). FARs end the de0nitions dier the cxTssingand new Wslce houses shall remain as set forth and defined in reo Land Use ReguUti In effect as of June 10, 1991, notwithstanding and-s ut'all survive for not less shah the Ihr&y"rlod next succeeding Juno 19 my subsequently adopted reduction in or change to the definition or calc�a of PARS. The seven new sownhomes have received an RHO cot under the fifty GMQS and have received variadons for height, open space and stlba for necessary buildings, all as noted on she Plat and described herein. ATTACHMENT 2 —LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: MAR 0 8 2016 CITY OF ,6`}1 Name: Aspen Meadows Townhomes Location: 11 thru 111 Meadows Road Aspen, CO; Aspen Meadows, Lot 5 Trustee Townhomes (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273512239001 thru 273512239011 and 273512239800 APPLICANT: Name: Aspen Meadows Townhomes HOA c/o John Sarpa Address: 71 Meadows Road Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: 379-2595 REPRESENTATIVE: Name; Poss Architecture attn: Kim Weil Address: 605 East Main Street Phone #: 925-4755 TYPE of APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ® Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Lot 5 of the Aspen Meadows contains 11 townhomes of varying floor areas and 1 common parcel with no structures. Previous Approvals: The Aspen Meadows Specially Planned Area; Book 667 at Page 731 PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Amend paragraph IIE "Lot 5 - The Trustee Houses at the Aspen Meadows" updating the allowed floor area along with bedroom and bathroom limitations. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 4,550.00 ® Pre -Application Conference Summary ® Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ® Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ® Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑3 n Medel c r laEge pF@:e,.t N/A All plans that are larger than 8.5" X II" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre -application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. NOW RECEIVED ATTACHMENT 2 —LAND USE APPLICATION FEB 2 2 2016 PROJECT: CITY OF ASSPE-N Name: Aspen Meadows Townhomes !?E'ki N` Location: 11 thru 111 Meadows Road Aspen, CO; Aspen Meadows, Lot 5 Trustee Townhomes (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID if (REQUIRED) 273512239001 thru 273512239011 and 273512239800 APPLICANT: Name: Aspen Meadows Townhomes HOA c/o John Sarpa Address: 71 Meadows Road Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: 379-2595 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Poss Architecture attn: Kim Weil Address: 605 East Main Street Phone #: 925-4755 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ TextNap Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ® Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals. etc.) Lot 5 of the Aspen Meadows contains 11 townhomes of varying floor areas and 1 common parcel with no structures. Previous Approvals: The Aspen Meadows Specially Planned Area; Book 667 at Page 731 PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Amend paragraph IIE "Lot 5 - The Trustee Houses at the Aspen Meadows' updating the allowed floor area along with bedroom and bathroom limitations. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S 4,550.00 ® Pre -Application Conference Summary ® Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ® Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ® Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre -application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. r.. The Trustee Townhomes at the Aspen Meadows February 22, 2016 To whom it may concern, This is to verify that the following are the owners of the eleven Trustee Townhomes at the Aspen Meadows. Unit 1— Barry Smooke (Barry Smooke Aspen Trust) 2 —Victoria Lea Smith 3 —The Aspen Institute, Inc, a Colorado Non -Profit Corporation 4— Presley Reed (Presley Reed 1999 Family Trust) 5—John J. and Ricki L. McHugh 6 — Nancy Furlotti (NSF 1976 Investments LLC) 7 —John G. and Jan Jones Sarpa 8 —The Aspen Institute, Inc., a Colorado Non -Profit Corporation 9 — Harris D. Sherman and Richard D. Lamm 10— Luciano and Giancarla Berti (KENROSS LUX S.A. a Luxembourg Corporation) 11- Marcia D. Strickland The above owners have authorized the Trustee Houses at the Aspen Meadows HOA to pursue the attached amendment to the Aspen Meadows SPA. Further, the HOA has authorized Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. to act in their behalf on this matter. Their contact information is as follows: 605 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 925-4755 kweil@billposs.com For the record, the address of the subject property is Lot 5 Aspen Meadows SPA with physical address of 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, 91, 101, and 111 Meadows Road Aspen, Colorado. Also enclosed are the Agreement to Pay Application Fees and Check #72078 for $4, 550 and the HOA Compliance Form. Sarpa President Trustee Towhomes at Aspen Meadows 71 Meadows Trustee Rd Aspen, Co 81611 John@Johnsarpa.com 970-379-2595(C) Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representinq the property owner. Property Owner ("I"): Name: Trustees Houses at the Aspen Meadows HOA Email: john@johnsarpa.com Phone No.: (970) 379-2595 Address of Lot 5 aspen Meadows SPA Property: 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, 91, 101, and 111 Meadows Trustee Road (subject of application) Aspen, CO 81611 I certify as follows: (pick one) ❑ This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. © This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understa d that this document is a public document. Owner signature: [[ date: Owner printed na or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: oolq..msl.�c, REVAN FOR PERMANENT"rILES Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the Citv of Aspen ("City") and Property Trustee Houses at the Aspen Phone No.: 379-2592 Owner ("I"): Meadows HOA Email: john@johnsarpa.com f Address of Lot 5 Aspen Meadows SPA Billing 501 East Hyman Ave. Property: p Address: Suite 201 (Subject of (send bills here)AsP en, Colorado 81611 .,....r....,.:,.,.� I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees Is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. _ For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. 4 550.00flatfeefor PUD Amend. . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for $. flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no -payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 4,550.00 deposit for 14 hours of Community Development Departmentstaff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ 0.00 deposit for 0 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. 1� City of Aspen: Chris Bendon Community Development Director City Use: Fees Due: $_Received $ Property NameVyu Sarpa HOA President c r C. i t Its CO- SM N-81h-S7- fit �10,7 Sa A yle�C-reek-Dr� Paya�y. � � • m °p nY-ln Cemeter-y �.n ♦ T � 1. III ABBREVIATIONS U,N Xwr AGNI nl ADD AoS L JJ aIEAWFl .A ANEXAMERAL 11 VIL.A.11 nNE D INa APIECE AMSERAMOR All EI RMllunp NS H. LIBLED TO NU n. au WAI BMMT, IF I BRG. VITU B O e m.e! ^e BDe Ertl IF tten Z � om e.o. emm Vl G IDIOM u tlMul wliiq --- C el .11 N RE DATA GENT. CE6 BE IS channel TAU =tAINE SHALL ADIA IL CE - L. NOW LD. S, carWnPRINAND, Jne.w COL SAS — .SO G. ANIGAM NO I.nil LONEi- ...Non`^n G.D. CAPIDUNIN INUTIOUP ONI PLO NT0. am^'rS coXR' y GI I Al 1-11 A WE FAR, 1 w. AFr".f HE DIN Re FAIR ow° a�WhWILW E REED. � GB PHIL m,1-Wrel Ran AFAV .111. +w PNem CAN EISeIM6 uv. CLES. 1^areLATER In1N `a. 1xo o1 It A AT FO S. N11E SIR EPA ANn- FR. TUAL n Era'I R DIG PAIRS, AN aFLUOR RHAND a^ END FAIII c. E Z 1 eeme A, &WAY PRIES w v. PARIBAS DART. ANNAL, AC. GC R aowo eff 11 WGARV— .YM e E ., M. INTERN IDEN Inv. IIN 1e VVR.DIANE OPR, E. NONSXe s,,,.... OF. SABA tllamPr REARI Ili. IS HA I ... PC I AREA PAP R. RFEG I 1 Ilvl HE IF N,r RG h RES IJI RG e All I RLON RE ERIC RR m a'SII'R(11N O ID US AN s TV,, N^ OFNIEVEN 41A ILIA ,UK 11 LAN T0.0 IS UPU To I V, Tn,I VERi. VA �al`PH ok Y A. ULFalpaln A lBY 11 Feu vrvvr. WDII W— �.on lua neexe Iva avDA 6 VIA iINPUTS a 11 AN, IF ele L aWle ESUSED AS AeevEVi o 1st PAT s^o :° VAR It PER cm VI nn aRAB ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS l XORIN D IFIRSTPURS CONTOURS C TRUE MNN/ TEL.NOTED ON HIGH SIDEI /u\ — corvD N IEL NOTED ON HIGH SIDEI XK BAR' DWG X'I •A5,'M'G SHi. 11 ' izri -10 RELY AN, III I OF NS SECTION KEYING Ak ELEVATION EXISTING XK PAD IRWIN II•S Al -117. el ,q -10 FELT NEW I'88' �DWGBUILD ELEVATION X/ -A EN Or'. XI �i A ROOM NAME DOOR NUMBER LIVING R DOM AND NUMBER 1'AN AS.AI A' -DR. ID.1 000 100 PLAN 6 GOT ELEVATIONS I INTERIOR ELEVATION KEYING BUILAPAU I 1 -EL. IF.I A7L- ENT. X1 IT A AEROSOL IVX-NOTE B iaOT AI.VV X VAR /LL6[N VI — WINDOW TYPE IDENTIFICATION CONSTRUCTION TYRE IXAVW-JEEIREI-1- -O TIRE/'AN'-KEYNUTEI O e W-I— I� MATERIAL INDICATIONS EARTHWORK: OISIURBF➢ R,717��01 UNDISTURBED ffg III=III= STONE/GRAVEL POROUS FILL uEmm MASONRY: FIREBRICK BRICK STONE CONCRETE MASONRCONCRET UNIT CAST IN PLACE 0 PRE CAST GROAT/MORTAR SAND METAL: ALUMINUM STEEL - LARGE SCALESTEEL- SMALL SCALE dS OI CARPENTRY: RAMI F ROUGH NG/ ROL ROUGH BLOCKING- h1 DISCONTINUOUS J OIMFNSIONAI. ILMBFR PLYWOOD FINISH CARPENTRY THERMAL PRO] FC I ION(:j(j(j(R�� RAIL/RLAN KET UU(JiWW�1llL IOGSF FILL RIGID FIBFR BOARD SPRAYFIJ FOAM GLAZING: GLASS CAULK and SEALANT SEALANT W/BACKER ROD JOINT FILLER PLASTER/BACKING BOARDS LATH PIASTER GYPSUM WALL BOARD CEMENIBACKER (UNIT E BACKER UNIT L = GENERAL NOTES 9. PILnEP OF ANNNIER.MVIT WASTIAGENCIES SHALL BE MADE A PART OF THESE CONTRAST DIVIDENDS ANN I INSPECTION AS AARRFN BY HAD RIPLITARST I Coot IN HE A' THE BIRDS 11 IT 11 ASIDEPTIVOT TO' ,�l 8 UPS ION I TIS CONTINGENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE VCR THE AT DRALAINGS SPECIFICATIONS ADDENDA SAFETY AND CARD OF KFACEN1 PROERFIRS DURING AID CURB I'MANTRUP DOCUMENTS AS BATCH OF THE �CNSTN ACTION 'OR COMPLIANDE WITH RECRUIT AND TRIP I III, REGULATIONS AND FOR TH ` A UHUTRUGI IN ACCORDANCE ASH THE SUNERAPANTI Or AN I WORK UNTIL IT IS DEUVEREED 7TICTION ANINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE CONSPIDATIS AND COUBMAJOUS WORK INDICATED DO PARDONABLY J. A L ENTERING ENDED TAKE PROVED ENCE OVER FRED ED N LIT EN SHALL BE PROVIDED AS r HIUUH STATED I CLORECONS, BOUNDARY NOTED IN TS FULLY COINTI, AS PDT. INDICTED HOT TO CIA F SMANNINS ARE BY FACE OF AN' DISCREPANCY 5ETANDIN I ME CONTRACT FRAMING ING AND" MENTA SHOULD BE RESULTED TV 1 HE 11 'ILL 04 I ILL WAS SHALL SIMPLY "I I I At I STATE AND I 'CAL SPENDING THROUGH I LOBBY SYLIPIS AND NALLS, WIOH ALL PURITESTURP - ANNOSTINDI MHOURNICAL DISFA AND ORDINANCES AND SHALL or PERFORMED NL I , A B AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS WELL Al RES D THE ' CONTRACT DUCHROUTS All INTENDED TO INCLUDE RE URBAN MAT RALI IIIIIAINT ALI L CONTRACTOR V, ILL ASSUME RESPENCIALI TV FOR 19 LMS It�RiEtL' HEARDIN I SON R E RESPONSIBILITY IF THE BIDDING PROCESS THE CONTRAREFOR SHALL AD TRACTOR TO SAND UP THE ATTENTION Or ILI CLINSTART THE ARCHITECT FVO� ANY IFECONTIGHTS LF, 1� N`CT ANY CONNI TONS 01 IICI I WILL NOT PERMIT EXCLPOLIUDE IF I CONTRACTOR SI FALL O ^XI CONFUNIIIIIIN ANDID 13 TO THE ITTEIIIII IF ANY THESE. AN NOTED IN DOCUMENTS 1 FALSE SUALVALN I TU� ARCHI ARE SHALL PROVIDE N I I BIDS PRIOR I ANDIDIRAZATIAN OF FULF SO PUBERTAL INFORMATION REGARDING THERMS ARCUI I LUI, WIN I KAISER A START PC' 'ON' "'ALL IN I EN I WHILE ACCOMUSLA I IONS FOR FORTRAN NOT OMIT CHANCE OR RESBCF THE DART IV OF AD TITUROMPI nONTRACTOPECUMENTSIN NOTORIOUS. AC�OAGNAAUEE III THE OFFICIAL CONDITIONS. 1 11 11 ALL FIRST DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN WITH MATLINALINSPROUJoUl 'HALL RE IIIIENTED TO THE ICKIIIIATIALN ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE RES RESPECT RES OFARRINIAND IN DIVISION ONE I r OF THIS N WHIR F SUBLE IS BRAIN ED I' FINTIONG FINISHES ARE DO EST ICINESS WILL BE GIVIIIIIII ONLY IF A NEAR MATCH THE AREA PRICE TO THE DISTURBANCE, ADVANTAGEOUS UNDRESS DATE DR I ESSER COST WITH SAERFECING QUALITY APPEARANCE. AREAS CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WITH FIT I CONDITIONS TO PC IN. UNDER NO FIRAI "ARE I ILL THE �OFNFIRMINA THAT A' I ABOARKISgUILOADCASAS AAUI� LOT BE REQUIRES TO PILIF THAT A PRODUCT I ISBN PRIOR To PROCEEDING AIN THE ADDS THE PRIPAAFb OCR PUBSTIELSTION IS OR IS NOT BOUND AN CC NTRACTUR SHALL W11.11 : HE ALSO 'I" FOR SUBSTITUTION HILLS AS I AU I ANNE OF WORK DR .1 ASIAN IS POSSIBLE %GUE5T THE BICUSPID DAN APPROVED TIRE PDRATITINION I FATH ABUT I ANHOU1 "IS A' CUTTING. 'ABC 'For F SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS EST SHEETS AND BAMP,E$ DR LIVING R NOT NECAURAND INDIVIDUAS ILL WHEN REQUIRED AT THE INGINGETRUNI FARB AMOW DESCRIBED IN TEE CONTRACT DOCUMENTUR NO R� THE ATHINTOT PAN UP TO COMMENCING "'TO BEIRUT SIDI IF CUTTING PATCHING Do R EASED ORTO ALL WEEK RELATED 7 SUCH F171NG REQUIRED TO PUTS ERLY BACCOMINAFF OFF SAMPLES SHALL CONFORM WITH REVIRWEQ AND PLO F OF WORK R 'ALL RELIEVE IF I[ CONTRACTOR ANCIPIELL SAMPLED PURK WERNI PLAN 'Or FROM 1 HE RASPURRIBLEVE TO PERFORM CHAIN 'IRK UP A A SHALL BE RFMQ— AND REPLACED AT THIS AS REUTERS no��O NOTES S EXPENSE. ABOACONTREACTORT SHALL TO ROUGH THE ZNLflALGSH1AAISALL COAL SIR SPECIFICATIONS ARE OPLEGUENRIELY SUCH A MANNER AS TO ALLOW ABSORBED TIME F R DR PROCElbort A In I IF It RELATED AGAIN ALL REVIEW AS NOTED IN 11 B SPECIFICEPTURENS. AND AS DO CLIFF SHALL BE IF THE D REA or A REQUEST FUR PUT To oEur noBK v1RWLK sxw K MANDBIALL AD A SHALL BE ERECTED PLUME AND TRUE AT NVBID IN'FUSION ONE Ill OE TNERmRUT BUILDING / ZONING DATA yNALIAn NAa A. ma rrna.. m nnAl AA u n nmE Low. nene.I OPLA RURAL SEA 1:INS -n sm 11 '1:an DUE AV,HWAILD 1 ADITER, .I TOP u: oFUNA.menl eP Fere —.A., FAR SUMMANDS 12 EARL w. e. If PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER INDIVIDUAL CONTNCT, DIEDue xnmuxnsn vexmms on UNITS 1,11 ASPEN MEADOW SMAIL AT L PHASE AND ARROTERVERS : EAST MAIN SHIP I ALL CARD EST 11B ALL, DRAWING INDEX NET LEVEL NA SPECULATION I FARE UNIT I MAIN I FALL HE CALG��T ON I FARE UNIT I UPPER LEVEL FAA CALCULATION WE UNIT 2 MAIN LEVEL FAR FACCULETTH I PASS 'UNITS ARPORL111LEAVOLIBLUMAT 4 FARE UNIT 4. UPPER LEVEL FAR TAGEOLATIAR I FART UNIT 5 LOWER LEVEL FAR APUL NDN 5 FARE PAN LEVEL FAR CALULU ION 6 FART UNIT A LOVED VICE FAR CALCULATION 6 SAID INITS MI CALCULATION 6 - FARE UNIT 6 UPPER LEVEL FAR GATTI- CAR AD MAIN LEVEL FAR STICULANAN CAS UNIT 8 MANY LEVEL FAR CALCU,UDV 9 NAVY ONI 1 9 UPPER LEVEL FAR BENCRI AIDE 11 UNT1 UNIT 10 LOWER LEVEL FAR INSULATION 10 FACE UNIT 10 LOWER LEVEL FAR (ACTIVATION 10 FARE UNIT 10 MAIN LEVEL SAN CALSTATIGN j U� IF LEVEL FAR CALCULATION LOCATION PLAN Aspen ®APmtNtalFslale AT 4] RAN nS TV 2 y `y uUP AN FP LOCATION posy ARCHIIECTDRE HE PLANNING NELREAR, -Li b 'AariC MA 18 2016 CITY OF �t iff��qq ARAMPUT Oi 1111 VNIF FAIR IV:111T10N Dr_1}IG SL TT MAN `A AI ILL'.IATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION IL IF TD F-VV.WV.VV l— ACAD, DEVOI w.e1nN . n¢. ART. FAR.V11FTG1ITHIFLISH.SReeravv SHE 11 T. GENERAL INFORMA'I ION FAR SUMMATION G-001 OL116 f A�iujv as �MAAA mW wwAmYaxwMeenn r n I.Wgbµ memlw om" aOPm.J <rINCIg a., d,eaYm s. iwf :ly".Nm.°:erwcAe"i ad M` =11. p°".I ww.. ennln a w.unl nla mw.ml ow Ip n. .il `ormYxm Nr N.Iwmmy,wW xwY. nawyM D, vai D1WI0M MmYq�wa W qm um+m^ram+mm (JnItiwYWIm NPeuMM(N'�. I I Jm olY6mA<JLubM n�mmxr ¢mYnn �mm w r pp.wY WJwmm:amm mm. pv annmm uaM IL W�Jlml memaen )eml �fJllvvwmmer�N nNn aU°n!w&avu uN YxJmWY: ��� � nN mlmydW[aar JpxMmlm mLYn[rRaWma�NbmJ:mp nYw .Ihw, mWmm �xlnNme4 mpmumYen e! uWY{— sp— pYY pkl Nxowm,eMgm vy x�v.mlwk� prgsy lw alw -m1 ev W WL 9imr mv4 MH Im4mIN b`ep (NR Mfi Y Afw�mmlm ir4rmwtl N3� maxE155Nm.ltn.t wAarmFa r Nl vn naY a1Pg(i APbaeS/ I YW MH M umPe�u Eh I MO f y r TaWW M �FYlnl`m�W�Ni1HW ��I fDUm M�j� �4yj[IAnpu WptpAµal ymfY�J��fxW�i (eraeyWlr{ � ry� b[p1)�' 14 �W �M,r:W.a�MnmMfMl �M1�NpAWPoA-� YM Ib Om Niwww.rw ¢NPmwel baw+v lw dw uW Hw WIInpFvlmnu Dl.mamvwlunYmm+[ri NN.IaN..XN w� Nun w�lwm� ne M°R:xwMew ems: m°m w:Men rn am"0"Ada", InlmmW�.wlWlal. W [y P.mm�uualmm�.r.a PleumW. B'm"Wlaw m"a"aMew: �`a!nm:l ilim al'rv"L m.µm ey �epumµnYlWYae nvJa.meveYN a mR�vuwu ¢r ( gofr.AauvN m}M tifd I umvN pwnla 1 ¢akYN MI A m�1.—P�x .be N N A i�nusml wmelr abaA+em nxD NI �.:w�:w:x :i-�mY mwl:mlmulmr a.r✓Mu.okam� .I :' 1 of ddaadd-..�Omv�Arlm�'efpNy-)m ide MYw i..a, �. m,v n.me m°u uemw.a. «xneMNdad w. rw almrMwdeervm 7. D a' ,da `1 M elmmdanY PoWanmN .n M W pNp Zua OIN:bV n 11m�gYrtw pu Nkw lun ad fw W JmMpmn uJbmn axW� els.rzmi . q unleulm W. rtl: 'ad a AIWD a�e..NMwN: el d 1 M: p}y Q Mw W ) MPYWAV v: IO fm IP �Y IN If lug UIN. AMtlm un PnRZxDpvk�fmn YW 'wv 1"— ad aaum0Ae aqm afA e) Mldmum la,'a stm 4 ud IO rul lu Mlemp Id. 4P+ II 'VadmiEOV urmq OLn W Aw q,"dam 4.m wi de.—, rv.lm ly bi dp rul) a mm orgm alua:gJwl FwW Ilnl Je. ]1R v a-.--.ad��yl�-.1.1 aaaMa WmYpIIrInYWIIn:In�Ngm. W�uuura..pppp me.ilYmrrapw:q Aa dhmW mn RqupnimuN.Im 1 %Q10. 1 mlufuv,a.. nq Fnpmreme. adYn4 d ya dANwI,Nd Nvl ImtlwW imW.wmnu m mmpgq uie yprvvq ly N. phlle wad nl.>um.wrmmdm..elN¢, mwm wn M.. u:. dgn:m.Julm. b. Yvlm NOmnCYmvow gFm,n Nvumu wWNJNII+:mnaulM M �m.uui M:mmJ wuni Oryvnllenry�nw�tl¢mlellwluu.. mJl 6. �.bla.IG[Oeg erurN ' iSgWn 3N gmNMJ.mI NA:MgMp pwl tN 14 �m �s VNmp nH WankMe nl iWl W¢ talprl � p p �t wd wr pel `� `O1 YNwpr+�l w`�m v M ��sam mauM Wtl nl ppvtnW mJe e..ae WvW� �aI„m,W'ly s.ww.el..mYwvPwomum.N .ml nOy�IWa',I�mntldnW Jerclepmwlw W6. AgmMnbIAI �Wma4 etuwa�mmlv�NUAmn�lxelum wlu✓^Dpme�mYmehtlmm�PW v�a mrymNa, w,w,Ywm W�wewnuww. ��emul�:� eenmrrw`dmmnJMme wmlmlmwmmYlmwaNm Mand mpW N mAv.tmevmalwxWmNnrW Y.rnne lY, IWI. l'wunpme YVllwmw Mglm. xxln.JmYm.wd.ml m.memp /anvxOW�'wYY �m MWM n.r Wyau Yrt NReIYmv uYWwun.f 1 mum. emmvamem Mwmq.mmunad uaadd w. q:y OAtW ml Nw .qIM wMYw h Wlk epn rym: xl eY .v m�umry pipflnd5 W u rqW mNppbl¢N lmaMl Avdl. poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING m.lsns nxlnlrvc pal ul.wlAnory ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION I1 II l.4ym MwdmvaTw..la, open, Colorado, B1611 PO ppnlErTXb 21511W vvm Ills: AMi-FAR�PUOdwd s..11[ PUD DOCUMENT PUB i O ❑ d� � I : V y P i \ \ of / \ \ Li '� /des` UNPA= POPD 13 .so-ec M.6Z.40gt0 N --��� —e � I _ i ,' / i � . M1/ 2s'"g"" % .• / W o o ra o S S Z 9 ggg \ see M =� 5 QF 3 Hn tl6cy< 56 S h a O< w f 'Cy !F S ,SO';SC M„t S,LOe00 E �i H -3 oW�' w / Ile14 op ec`a'`Q v 1 I --— —— — — — — — — _ .00� to I. IL WFLL I \ALL V LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. — NORTH ELEVATION 4 / 116'.1'�0' ❑ FAR Key Oounfmp FAR I r,i LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Ua11a.1 p ..,._ a ;r_ rv�o -Po-miw WALL % AREAS — LOWER LEVEL ESIG. FXPOSFD WALL AREA (511. TOTAL WALLARN CDO - 40.00 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA 770.12 IT TOTAL WALL AREA=1350.12 at % WALL AP EA - EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA Ii0.12e1I1350.12sf=S80X100=57o EXPOSED WALLAREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE -1272.00 If 1272.00 sf X Si0 = 725 W a1 COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION FAR CALCULATION Zone District- SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes AS 2500 IF FAR a 50D IT Garage per SPA Jocwnanl, page 22 Reception A340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 If Garage 5005f Deco= 2500 sf FAR x. 15= 3755f UPPER LEVEL 015UO If MAIN LEVEL 123435If LOWER LEVEL 725 o4 IF GARAGE 000 sf DECKS 168.11 If TOTAL 2942.50 If 294250 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 442.50 sf over allowable FAR Garage Oalwlatl0n Allowable Geroge s f. per SPA 50D.00 If Exi51in0 Garage (Cerpetll 459 26 If Available Garage FAR 40 72 sf Exieling Geroge 452,28 If c500 I.J. -Allnweble Garage Garage'a exempt from FAR Dark Calculerion MaNLevel Deck Area 239,11 of Upper Level Deck Area(12800 sH 1T6005p 304.11 If Total Deck Area 54311 sf 543,11 af(Total deck)- 375 If (Allowable Jack) 168.11 If -165.11 0 Deck Area Courd r, towartls FAR posy ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING W-1Sr9 ".IIDL FAP 111 CI l ANON FE11 D FPT, C4LC1.'I PT I ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION n lo.ulwmu I.w "I'll, kO cap FILE LMR I_EO I SLI I I., SHEET TITLE l)NIT 1 I1WER LEVEL FAR CATCIrLATION 1 - FAR 1 eE I -I WALL C 3,1e,t,o. FAQ ® counting FAR - _-I 3/la'=P-p' LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN � WALL, WALL WALL LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. — EAST ELEVATION WALL % AREAS — LOWER LEVEL ESIG OPOSEO WALL AREA (s0 TOTAL WALL AREE o.o0 40.00 000 3SE5 16.73 1a 63 26.11 3482 WALL IT 12A00 __. 129.00 WALLi 20&15 237.8 WALL 0.00 387.92 TOTALS 770,12 1350.12 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 77012 Of TOTAL WALL AREA -1350.12 Of 96 WALL AREA = EXPOGED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA 770,1201131 560 X 100 = 5] rREXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE= 1212.00 at 1272,00 Of Or 570 = 725.04 at COUNTING FAR 1po--or,FAR CALCULATION FAR CALCULATION Zone Distrrict- SPA -aspen Meadows 11 Town homes 0 2500 Of FAR a 500 Of Garage per SPA document, page 22. Reception #3401 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 Of Garage 500 of Decks=2500 at FAR x.15= 37551 UPPER LEVEL 81500 at MAIN LEVEL 123435 Of LOWER LEVEL 725.04 at GARAGE 0005f OECIRS 166.11 If TOTAL 2942.50 of 2942.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 442.50 sf over allowable FAR Geiaga Calumet. Allowable Garage ct per SPA 500.00 at Existing Garage (Car 45926 of Available Garage FAR 4IRsf EUZMg Garage 4511 at -500 au. -Allowable Griage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Mein Level Deck Area 239d1 Of UU p,r Level Deck Araa(12B00sfLP80057.__ 30400 Of Total Deck Area 543.11 51 SEE. 11 at (Total deck)- 375 at (Allowable deck) 168,11 Of = 158 11 sf Deak Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING ori ii auc U E\ISIIV1' FAA CALCLnATI've usC,0 1J5 nLVL.m TnncnuoinnoN ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION LSlal a.Aomn Iau r< LTlondo, Bloll XOFM PROJECT L1111 M I "I Jlwat_l, BXfET ITT I INIT 1 FORCES LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 -FAR2 it M.In LPVPI Deek Afea --.. =23911.1 - Meld lsrel Floomm. =124ve0 If WALL K Ara v I r � el hl T' s,' e raoewerL zs'r FRok awnu w nn -raw wn� _... I w=sesa --------------------------------- WALL J WALLS WALL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. — SOUTH ELEVATION FAR Key ® Counting FAR Deck Are. 0 car, A,eu WALL II Eo + 4 0 r + WALLT �. - WALL I + ❑ - + a e + + + + + + + + + + n ---- T + + + + + + T + T r WALLfl T i T++ T T T T+ T + + + g + T T T+++ T+ T+ Gar, & WILL 3 + + + + + + + T + + A❑ dodo + + + + + + + + + + + a Flood- +/+ r + « � I 6 Cox, Floor late ✓ r t t + + + � 459 JB of WALLP A c MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN � anesl'.A• _____________________________________________________. WALL WALL WALL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. —EAST ELEVATION % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA 2058.21 If TOTAL WALL AREA 2069.61 If % WALL AREA - EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 2058.21 5....69.in If =.994 X 100 - 99.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1241 80 or 1241.80 If X 99 = 1234,35 If COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION o R. FAR CALCULATION Zane Dlsvml - SPA. Aspen Meaaowz 11 Town M1omea A 2500 If FAR. 500 of Garage per SPA document, Pa9. 22, R.cepinn W40931 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 If Garage 5"of Deoks=2500 If FAR 15- 375 If UPPER LEVEL S5.00 rift MAIN LEVEL 1214.351; LOWERLEVEL 72504sf GARAGE 0005f DECKS 168.11 If TOTAL 291 of 2942.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 442.50 If over allowable FAR GarageCali All bl G we per SPA 50000 rift Ei r 4 G 0 IS =) 4592e rift Available Garage FAR 40.92 If EI sba, G81age 459.28 If 1500 If -Allowable Garage Garage Is exempt from FAR Deck CalsiJbIrel Main Level Deck Area 239,11If Upper Level Deci(12000 sf+176.00 1 304.00 of Total Deck Area 543.11 If 543.11 If Qolal di- 375 of(Allowgbla dank) 16611.1 =168.11 of Deck Area Capr nB towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURE +RIpNNING C1u151I Ck"'0"I CAIPL`1TTCV ...in.r RLU FAN li4a4nn), ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION l nnl Aqw„C-I�wd.., dial wen', 10 i 141m .1'ILI LV[I I,,.Fllfndl2 d.p SUEn IULL I I MN AIN LEVF.I. PARCALCVLATION 1 -FAR 3 orrl, ar- MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. — NORTH ELEVATION 1 4 / d/I6'=1'0' 'J".FF� FAR ttey Lountlna FAR Deck Area Main Level Deck Area fyaipg¢ Aree 23911e1 - �0" wiO wnu T WALLA P i ❑.. case nu[. I: I - �- �m� u", I� I tin sse a it hl- A c Liv. WALL % AREAS — MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG FXPOSED WALL AREA (an TOTAL WALL AREA I50 WALL 304.87 87 WALL 26402 54,62 25462 WALL 613.73 60 73 WALL IT 159.86 159,86 WALL 469.19 _ 459. 19 WALLP 17233 172.33 WAILQ 181,59 18L59 WALL WALL WALL WALLU WPLL_V 158,42 18700 5291 5291 32.33 5020 _ 148.16 __. 4455 148,75 49.55 TOTA15 1 205821 206961 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 2058.21 at TOTAL WALL AREA - 20S9.61 at %WAIL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA = 2058.21 at l 2089 61 sf = 994 X 100 = 98 4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE -124LB0 of 1241 80 sL X 99 =1234 35 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Lone District - SPA -Aspen Metal I I Town homes A? 2500 or FAR. 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reculabon p34093T Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Cracks =2500 sf FAR x.15= 375 of UPPER LEVEL 815.00 at MAIN LEVEL f23435 at LOWER LEVEL 72504 s1 GARAGE 0.005t DECKS 1in, .11 sl TOTAL 2942.50 of 2942.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR=442.50 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Alluvel Garage sT.. cer SPA 500.00 of Eus'nq GAlAge (LarL 459.2851 Availa5le Garage FAR 40.72 o1 Existing Garage 459.28 at 1500 a f.-AlloweDle Carege Garage Is exempt from FAR Dock Calculation Main Level Deck Area 239.11 at Upper Levol DeckArai a6 sr. 175_a0s0 30490 s1 Total Deck Area 5 311 9 543,11 at(Tual deck)- 375 at(Alloweble deck) 166,11 or =166.11 5r Dock Area Counting towams FAR posy ARCHITECTURE aPLANNING [omci ani n. 11,115 Fh A ALtt"FIT, tb_!IJ ILL\'1:2D 4AR SALC'L�IAIYJN ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION mMms l Py.l...d.., aleu l pf"T , E141Lm Pas all "It 1_ uaroun.A I'llmn UNIT I MAIN LEVEL. PAR CALCULATION 1 -FAR 4 o� �1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN V L sns=p-0' %1 FAR CALCULATION U kl A i If =Iw Ods1 - UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 31i6'=Ir0' A FAR CALCULATION Zone DisVIc1-SPA-Aspen Meadows 1 t Town homes Q 2500 of FAR. 500 If Garage per 5PA documant, page 22. Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 If Gerege 500 If Decks =2500 of FAR x15= 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 015005f MAIN LEVEL 1234355t LOWER LEVEL 7250451 GARAGE 0005f DECKS letls1 _ TOTAL 2942.50 If 294250 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 442.50 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation AIIOwable Garage a.f. par SPA 50000 st ENInkre Garaa. G.d.N 459.2a sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 If Ends, Garage 459.28 51 <500 s! -Allowable Garage Garage Is exempt from FAR Deck Calcurefion Main Level Deck Area 23811 sl UDDer Level Deck Are. f 2600 of+ 1T600 sfl 304.00e1 IF Deck Area 543AIs( 543.11 ofFortal dark)- 375 If(All Owabledeok) 16811 of =168.11 of Deck Area Counting towards FAR WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Us,, Level The engre Upper level Is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION 1 Xo..le It posy ARCHITECTURE -PLANNING au�c ci ra <IL m-o-u ulsnvc cna cnmuuno� gnz4ns nil x<Lu sneumanno� ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION bpnFnloMo�PLLU1� remmlXg. LII1(9 N wl¢ �15M12dnu IIET711F UNIT I UPPER LEVEL. FAR CALO L ATNN 1 -FAR5 ry ru `ma\ WALL CALCS. - LOWER LEVEL - NORTH ELEVATION Unessoov43ackedQ r w6pac grpldte I II I LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN �m rx�veurvu: _ _ _ � roo rIen u'v nu -aruewwr �`t r rv... WALL WALL WALL L� WALL CALCS. -LOWER LEVEL - SOUTH ELEVATION aI1fi,1'.p. — WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WAI I F 1 0 1 7.74 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA 130]2 of TOTAL WALL AREA -460.17 at % WAI I. AR FA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA = 136.72 d I466.Ti sf -.299 X 100 = 29.3 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 386.17 If 306.1T sf X 29.3%-113.15 IT COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION 1 I NO Sole FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Torvn homes @ 2500 FAR r 500 Garage pa, SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 25o0 of Garage 500 sf Decks - 2500 six.15 =3T5 5f UPPER LEVEL 57]47 of MAIN LEVEL 130721 sl LOWER LEVEL 113.155t NSEaGE .Go .cf DECKS 5431 It TOTAL 211214 s1 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2112.14 sf existing FAR = 387.87 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage ILL per SPA 50000 of Existing Garage maroon 306.80 of Available Garage FAR 19120 of Ex151ing Garage is ceb s.f. - Garage I5 exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck An IN IT of Upper Love ,a,Area 62945f Total Deck Area 429.31 of "149IT(Total deck)- 375 or (Allowable deck) = 54.31 of 54 31 51 Counting towartla FAR posy ARCHITECTURE : PLANNING Ix m151: r ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION x1 A.w„ arw,,., r,,.w...l„. A.prn, l'clnvde, IIIII npa>x 14 titLI Irn'e aorsbau6.. erdC TG UNIT 2 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 2-FAR 1 r>Xi' ::: 'PS:w2..w., se-1 IN I w 111[[I _ _ ° I ( _M° �a — — In i ARK T . •` ww roLlru­ _ `.. e,.. r - a ._ LI I —_ WALL fl II rrec. oisrw owx ��. 1 I � - _ E asr wmrmm.a III orulsnwrwca � 11 - _ __ aearxw u.0 _nnaorrxn naswm WALL H WALL G WALL Q ^ WALL CALCS. - MAIN LEVEL - NORTH ELEVATION WALL CALCS. - MAIN LEVEL - WEST ELEVATION F AILLL ­wALL L w.rr u I- La '-I TITAL rn, r 1 µe n, w , Left 'u .'. - 1 I ryrypp ililililil i>��itH 7uuuul{{ {� f eslo wu L-1 .aU� 1.=s11. w"� 70 t 1 n wnu 44� ALL I -� LINIFLIL ! rvna . rrco- mr II I I �. oano[ ' n wrcn eft -- I � °rvenuw II w ITTN wx Aics,s ,vv L 11________ ______________L________ �ewun.m uvev . _.��� WALL IN WALL WALL ''': ,,._Z.I�I WALL WALLA WALL WALLNe WALL WALL CALCS. - MAIN LEVEL - EAST ELEVATION i�1 WALL CALCS. - MAIN LEVEL - SOUTH ELEVATION �/ Planter Llni13 �- - �- YW Deck 366 i S1 �c7 Cumirns FAR ns0y DeakArea Carport Aiee[Garaga) inn N.-TeLinea J WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WAIT DFSIG E%POSEDWALL AREA(st) TOTAL WALL AREA (sR WALL N WALL 0 WALL P 08,76 44.07 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL - TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1426]6 IT TOTAL WALL AREA =16REA I IT Yry WALL AP EA = E%POSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA 1 N L 34 5t / FLOOR 5f =E = 1%100 = 89.0 %E%POSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = t COON If 1536.19 IF %89.0%=136T.21 at COUNTING FAR tAaa 30 If if ea Is ex xmpl up to 32 J Ly of Aspen core 651502J D. 11 FAR CALCULATION Zone Dlstrlol - SPA - Aspen MeaGows 11 Town homes a Z500 FAR t 500 Garage per SPA document page 22, Reception 6340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s( Garage 500 at Decks=2500 stx 15=375 If UPPER LEVEL 577,47If MAIN LEVEL 1361.21 It LOWER LEVEL 11315If GARAGE 000 of DECKS 54,31 bit TOTAL 2112.14 5( 2500 at (allowable FAR) - 2112.14 sf existing FAR = 387.87 sf available FAR for future development Gataoe Calnubda , Allowable Garage s.L per SPA 51000 s! EaISI'"a Gareoe lCnrpml) 386.Bo 5f Available Garage FAR 191 20 sf Eusling Sunn 6 500AL-GeA aaxempf from FAR Deck Calcolanon Main Laval Dark Area 36637 5f UpPor Level Deck Area 62.94It Tolsl Deck Aree 429,31 If 441,49 at moral deck)- 375 or(AlloweMe dark) = 54,3151 54.31 It Counting towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURE * PLANNING i 5 EU:ILL - n 0¢ -1 LLL\ FARt AL tLAi1VN ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Vxir! ry �:nlnrnaop lr.lr Axr XO0.M vir. zl llm Ua6 ELI L.nn _zuspnU�..0 SHEET TIRE [:NIT 2 MAIN LEVEL PAR CALCI❑LATION 2-FAR 2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 3llfibl'-p' FAR CALCULATION 1 I NO S�Ie LIL UnA3 I Upper lnvelF... pute / =111.47If Be.1 ael Sldlr I \l 1 FAQ FAR CALCULATION ® CounlingFAR Zone District SPA Asper Meadows Deck ALee 11 Town homes Q 2500 FAR +500 Garage per SPA document page 22, Reception 9340937 lass Are. 6294 If Allowable FAR FAR 2500 If Oa See 5005f Dccks = 2500 If x.15 = 375 If UPPER LEVEL 511A15f MAIN LEVEL 1357 21 sf LOWER LEVEL 113.15If GARAGE 0.Oo s DECKS 54.3le: TOTAL 211214 If 2500 If (allowable FAR) - 2112.14 If existing FAR = 387.87 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation All wabk Garage e! per SPA 500.00If Exsing .,an. ..,Pon, '06805( A 'lade Garage FAR 191205f Eusling Case, is<500sY Garage LS exempt from FAR Deck Calmla ser Main Level DockArex 366.37If Upper evel Deck Area 82945f Tmfll Deck Area - 429.31 If 441,49 If (Total deck) 375 If(Allorvable dock) = 54.315f 56 31 at Counting loesuNs FAR WALL % AREAS — UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upperlevel is above grade .ad counts Nwerde FAR FAR CALCULATION 1 posy ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING n1l 3J.ti Lx1y11NI FAR CALC't IU11 a1s u�r clp r_ex mmolnnory ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION M .[:nlnmaoxPlI1M snr iPC:Eflxp. 1 tlli6FILE sxmfRF a-4w UNIII LIPPER L EVEI, FAR CALCUL4TION 2-FAR 3 t:. UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ----------- WALL e 6 LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION WALL C 4 4LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION 3,ia,l-0 Unlf4 FAQ ® Counting FAR OnexciwatM Cramspa e i � I _—.evu«G er.. WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. FSPDSLDWAL I. AREA(sq TOTAL WALL AREA (on WALLA 68.22 13D 54 WALL 1966 37 96 C D 13168 _WALL _ WALL _ 18.15 3796 TOTALS ULF D3 338.14 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 196.03 st TOTAL WALL AREA=338.14 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA = 1(Ub3 sf 1338.14 s1=.314 X 10(= 31.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE=136.39 5f 138.39 of X X14 = 42 83 of COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION FAR CALCULATION Zone Dlsltlq-SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes A 2500 FAR 1500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception 8340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500>.I Garage 50D s.1. Decks = 2500 a f. x.15 = 375 s.l. UPPER LEVEL 57747 or MAIN LEVEL 1006]1 of LOWER LEVEL 4283 or GARAGE 000 sl DECKS 206.92 of TOTAL 1835.93 at 2500 at available FAR- 1835.93 at existing FAR = 664.07 at available FAR for future development Gernne calculation A"awable Garage aper SPA 500.00 s1 Exlstlnq Oalape (..:Pontr461625f Available Garage FAR 3B.19 of Existing Garage is c500 s f -Garage Is exempt mom FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 512955f ef�I Deck Area _ 6697st Total Deck Area - 581925f 581.92 sf(Total deck)- 375 st(Allowable deck) 20692 at 206 92 st Counting towards FAR posy ARGHITFUNF+R ANNING gN a, It, 11'"TNl)FAR"I'lI'. I An"V nA'1.15 FE1rt5Ep"."T"LI1111 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION L'Nai )I AeIw N.nAeurTnwno l.0 .1111,Nq. an6 111R)_'_11 V.r ' dap SHEETTITHE UNITS LOWER LEVEL FAROALOULATION 3 - FAR 1 MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. — NORTH ELEVATION 6 3I16'=1'd' ..NALL rn } } { {{ I sairsain Iii "Al wr- 3 *11 of I fMai L—A -1 — - ---- r w.,, as 4 f WALL WALL G MAIN LEVEL LEVEL WALL CALCS. — EAST ELEVATION Una4 Thle planter is >, per DXy fAcke reol- . 2661502. 0-G Unn2 WFLI .I MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN G sns-IL 11 L 11 .aw, uxeN. " ...,, .-,a... ..... ieL Ww� ,Im L NNeorew .ow,L. WALL K MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. —WEST ELEVATION e ��T wuL IL ar— sx.s�m.wA T Y'nre-oww...µa ElL... ,WLL jLr Oc:,r� WALLL WALL WALL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. — SOUTH ELEVATION -.."_.' FAR Ker ® Counting FAR Deck Area GiWn Area tGeiage) ® Plante, tFaempO WaLL .11H C 401.B2 at % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA - 1504,93 st TOTAL WALL AREA =1675 91 5f % WALL AREA - EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA = 1504.95 of / 1675.91 sf = 898 X 100 = 89.5 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 112328 of 1123 28 X 898=1008.71 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION 'k / NO Ycale FAR CALCULATION Zone Dbltict- SPA -Aspen geed... 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR+ 500 Garage per SPA cherar t, page 22, Reception tt3a093T Allowable, FAR FAR 25o0 a f. Garage 5005.f. Decks = 2500 sl x 15 = 375 5 t. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 at MAIN LEVEL 1008,71 of LOWER LEVEL 42.835f GARAGE o.0051 DECKS 206.92 sf TOTAL 1835.93 at 2500 sf available FAR - 1835.93 sf existing FAR = 664.07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage al. pef SPA So0005f Epsgn9 Gardga ICarpolt) _46182 of Available Gefege FAR 35ABat Existing Damps Is 500 s L - Garage Is exempt from FAR Deck CalaJatsm Main L.A Geck Area 51295 of Upper Least Deck Alan B8.97 sf ToUI Geck Area 581 92 of Sin 9z of(Trip l aeckl- 3755.L(Allowable dgaA 20692A 206 92 sf Counting towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURE. PIANNING anmm I:w �:;taB1 1_ net Fnr cnw Tnnou ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION reamlNc rcrn re rlrE I'll earn me I1N1'I l MAIN 1 P.VFL PAR CALCULATION 3-FAR 2 O AYv'• C 1C UM4 lacy q FFR LICEArea WALL I AREAS - UPPER LEVEL 9 6Upper Level- e entire upper lis above grade a 97If maveI and corms mwaMs FAR ' e Occn to aglow I i y1le, { S ".. Utrt 2 FAR CALCULATION _ FAR CALCULATION Zone District- SPA - Aspen Meadow, 11 Town domes @ 2500 FAR * 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception 0340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 a1. Garage 50Dsf. Decks 2500 s.f.x 15=37551 UPPER LEVEL 57747 sf MAIN LEVEL 100Ibf LOWER LEVEL 42.83 in GARAGE D.00 sf DECKS 20 ,a; TOTAL 1835.93 of 2500 sf available FAR - 1835.93 sf existing FAR 664 07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculator Allowable Garage d per SPA 500.00 sf E%'Stlnd Damage Damon) 481.82 sf Ase.I.Ne Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is 1500 a.f - Garage Is exempl from FAR Dock celculefien Main Level Deck Area 512.95 of ce Upr Level Dack Ama _ 6897 sf Tonal DeokAma - 581.92 sf 581 92 sf (Total deck) SS 5 L (Allowable deck) 208 92 sf 208.92 sf Comarlin, ng towards FAR posy ARCHII T PUNNING air 11hr, 11 ncr.1111111]10M1C.rlA11111n cri FL\LLpiARC1t1f1.UR ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION LWJ lY Cnlom lopPtnll� ' CT) rva01EC1P0 If57eh vn1-Nt f2l,. SNlnmlf r lNll 1 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 3-FAR 3 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN WALL A LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. — NORTH ELEVATION YIe'=1'0' WALLA LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. — WEST ELEVATION Une mvm6rowl.Pac__ Wal On23 FAR Key ® counting FAR WALL C LOWER LEVEL WALL CALS. — EAST ELEVATION WALL E WALL D LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. — SOUTH ELEVATION „a_,.n WALL % AREAS — LOWER LEVEL WA I. DFSIG EXPOSFD WAI. L AREA (a) TOTAL WALL AREA (SO WALLA wALLD wnuc WALL D _ WALL E _ _64_71 as T3 -_- o 8.69 17.91 124.90 a9.46 uz el 906 31 TOTALS 136.04 431.62 Xf LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSER WALL AREA =136,04 A TOTAL WALL AREA=431.62 sf %WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA 136.04 sf 1431.62 sf =.315 X 100 = 31.5 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 318.02 of 316.02 sf X 31.5%- 99.55 of COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone Distril- SPA- Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes 9 2500 FAR • 500 Garage par SPA comment, page 22. Receil IX34a93T Allowable FAR FAR 2500 e.r. Gaage 5005.1. Decks = 2500 af. x.15 = 3Y5 s.L UPPER LEVEL 597,47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1372.01A LOWER LEVEL 93 55 If GARAGE OOC st DECKS 66.49 Ed TOTAL 2115.52 of 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2115.52 sf existing FAR = 384.48 If available FAR for future development GGre . Ceorder ion Allowable Garages.f. per SPA 50000 sr EHatIn9 Galege lG�n) 3W.05IT Available Garage FAR 15995 of raising Garage Is <500 s.f. - Garage W exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 37855 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 441.49 sf 44169 sf (Total deck) 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 66.49 sf 66.49 sf Cuunt ng towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURE + PIANNING LN. nsLsnar, rwaceTt T'Tr, nR�415 LL\F�I,p FA0. CAI1YtAil0\ ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION 9, e.,F...w..a.so,i.,.. L.o. pm. 11oMwelG1L mmLcrho. 2r "I bi FILE t.. 1_smLE21" sxraTmrt IINIT4 LOWER LEVEL PAR CALCI ILATION 4 -FAR 1 L 3115'=1-0' LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FAR CALCULATION 1 nn6Mle — I _ I I ) _ _ __�_ --- n w. M. evwonuea r WALLG (1 MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. — NORTH ELEVATION V Dn l vi4'✓yAYO ,w wo Vn113 I uan.v "" - M - (. �I�lfl iltl(IG I o„ oaww.a. z lAIL KAl FAL ` /ik A —a nu--ols,r, a MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. — EAST ELEVATION ` I dllfi •=1.9• — � .aLL a „ , / Z- N, sal. TlT II •. I 3 MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. — SOUTH ELEVATION FAQ ® Coming FAR WALL %AREAS - MAIN LEVEL Deck Area (WALL DESIG I EXPOSED WALL AREA (A C) I TOTAL WALLA Deak Area 6294 at WALLi _. WALLI 54.56 5.67 123.26 141 J5 TOTALS % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1550.62 o TOTAL WALL AREA=1689,37 s1 % WALL AP EA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA = 1550.62 At 11689 37 at = 918 X 100 = 91 B % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1494.55 It 1494 56 sl X 91.6%=1312.id sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Tom, M1omes a 2500 FAR 4 500 Caere, par SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.1. Garage 5008 f. Decks=25005.Lx 15=3T55.f. UPPER LEVEL 571.47 of MAIN LEVEL 1372.01 at LOWER LEVEL 99.55 of GARAGE 000 at DECKS— — 66.49 At. TOTAL '115.52 sl 2500 Sf (allowable FAR) - 2115.52 sf existing FAR = 384.48 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation AlloweWe One9a s.Lper SPA 509D9 sf Ex51E I, Garage lCarcorll _ 340,65At Available Garage FAR 15995 at Elgi ng 500 s.L - Garage Is exempt from FAR Dark Calculation Main Level Deck Area 378.55 of UPVer Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 441.49 sl 441.49 5f (Total deck)- 375 sf(Allowable deck)= 56.49 sf 66.49 of Counting uWands FAR posy MCI UCTNRF. PLANNING pe RU I,G\'L L11114LGL1101.� ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION m,1 Av—�v. i.e.. nlal I vxolmixp nwp eu Lu119 !OtSCBIFdv4 UNIT MAIN IF.VFL FAR CALCOLATION 4-FAR 2 ds MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 ID16'L p. — FAR CALCULATION �pe5e NI. 11 C LL-1j, 10 Upper Lerel Floorplate� = 5]]4] an Fee, to 9elow Stair MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN — EXISTING 2 D poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I?K,A ,CCar pi.lil5 Ext11"IeR('AIL'IIAIIVN 06.0.15 kEVlc[➢FARfAIt111TIlUN FAR Key ® Cowneng FAR Urck A.ee FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS �- 6294 rY Zone District- SPA -AspeF MeeOows TRUSTEE TOWNHOME 11Tdwphome,page2DFAR .6DrirE eper FAR CALCULATION SPA document page 22. Reception p34093] Allowable FAR al ApnN<donn' FAR 250001. Gelsge SOO OF, LIT11 [.olomM, xlol Decks = "Eu R.J. x.15 = 375 N.J. UPPER LEVEL 5]7.4]sf MAIN LEVEL 1372.01 Of LOWER LEVEL 9955 a1 GARAGE O.DO sf DECKS _ 6,495t TOTAL 2115,52 Of 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2115.52 sf existing FAR = 384.48 sf available FAR for future development Calcuation Cl) Allowable Garage of. per SPA 50000 a1 Eua�Oarege(Carpod) 340,05 cf NORTH Available Garage FAR 15995 sf paler NO Eusting Garage Is <W 5 J. - Gamy. Is eRdC1t Lum FAR Deck Calculation Maln Level Deok Area 3]a.55a1 ourtA misreud... Up per Level Deck Area 62.94 of ExRnIRL - Total Deck Area 441.49ef 44149 sf(ToNT deck)- 375 Or(Allewa6le deck) = 66.4951 I]NIT 4 66,49 sf Counting towards FAR UPPER LEVEL FARO ElILAIICN WALL % AREAS — UPPER LEVEL upper Level -me Reduce, upper lerol is alrova grade addcauntz tpwardSFAR 4 - FAR 3 FAR CALCULATION 1 Ke a�I, r f7 dr— �E-- I WALL AREAS LOWER LEVEL -1 ----------- ---------- ----- - /o L-OVVER LEVEL FAR TOTAL U. j'- FAR CALCULA11ON EXISTING ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Lol I I I I N V, I , 1- ,kftl [ITLL �Nil 5 OWER LEVEL FAR CAl CMA I ON 5 FAR 1 0--- �v; WALL WALL WALL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 9q 6'�1'-0' _ WALL WALL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION UnlI6 0 wrr jA Av- I I 1 I I 1 I I f+ It WALLL Lack Area—. } 443. 17 of +harFi + + + + +I' + + + + + ++ V w4LL' + +++ ++ + + + + + +.+ + + + + + + ; P mar -- 32 sl Tnreplanter area is exei par Ally o1 Aspen code went 2657502DO.4 Uni14 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN U FAQ ® Counting FAR Lack Area Carport Area Gara9el IRanrerlEkv,in WALLA WALL E WALL K MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION J 11es6p' WALL F MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION 346t1-0' WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DECc. EXPOSED WALL ARfA7Rg - TOTAL WALL AS FA NO WALL E 291.50 291.50 WALL 422,19 466]3 WALL 120.58 1T4.IS WALL 86,27 16634 WALL L 140.13 140.13 WALL WALL K WALL 46.52 _ _ _46.52 14013 24860 140.13 _ 248.60 TOTALS 1495.92 I676D5 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1495.92 of. TOTAL WALL AREA -1576.05 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA 1495.92 sf 11676.05 if =.093 X 1 DO = 89.3 % E POSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE =111517 sf 1115.17 sf X .893 = 995,85 sf COUNTING FAR 1 FAR CALCULATION A FAR CALCULATION - EXISTING Zone District- SPA -Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes C 2500 FAR +50D Garage per SPA document page 22, Abrasion #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 26DO aL Garage 5105.f. Deck.="DOaf,x A5=3T5 sf. UPPER LEVEL 577A7 sf MAIN LEVEL .9585 Of LOWER LEVEL 4434 if GARAGE DOG sf DECKS 10490 if TOTAL 1722.95 5r 2500 sf allowable FAR - 1720,12 sf = 777.04 Sf available FAR for future development Gamble Calculation Allowable Garay s J. per SPA 500,00 A Exstlno Garage(Careen) 447.50 if Available Garage FAR 5240A Evil Garage Is <500 s T - Garage in exempt from FAR Dreck Calcula00n Main Level Deck Area 443,17 sf Upper Level DO& Area 38]3 at Total Deck Area 479 90 sf 479.90 sf (Total all 375 5 L (Allowable deck) 104.90 of 104D0 sf Cornering towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING #rsl fE , Agog N, IRI9V FAIL CALL,IIII IOY 2+r5 ISL[1 hP l.(TLCLIAr10N ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Aram m,.1—Ir,IIIII^ xoen, PRIOl. 31s11 m� I s_slmal..m- 6xRT 0!¢ UNITS MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCt IlAT ON 5-FAR 2 -.'k. .caa u-v'r_ I - UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A WALL IN, AREAS — UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATIONS — EXISTING xo-.w — ris FAR CALCULATION — EXISTING Zone Daniel - SPA- Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes a 2500 FAR+500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception 9340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500o.L Gars re Soe 5.1. oanka=2500sf v 15=475 a.r. UPPER LEVEL 517.47 sr MAIN LEVEL .95 8 5 at LOWERLEVEL 44.74 of GARAGE 00051 DECKS 104.9051 TOTAL 1722.95 of 2500 sf allowable FAR - 1720.12 sf = 777.04 Elf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage 51. per SPA 500.00 of Epsfin9 Ga Ede rCarppol 4476o AT Available Garay@FAR 5240 of Existing Garage is <500 5! - Garage is exempt rmm FAR Deck Celc.letlon Mein Level no -Area 443.V of Upper Leval Deck Area 36.73 at Total Deck Are. 479,90 of 479.90 st CrodI deck)- 375 z.1.(Allowable deck) 104.90 at 104.90 of Countiny 1oweNs FAR posy ARCHITECTURE + pIANNING Olo1rTT m lsls n cpwlgv ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL Fir, 1v1-1, 1411 am �131lr 0*0 FILE t mrtt tm5nev. a..e FEEL MILE UNIT 5 UPPER LEVEL FAR CIA]CII,AI ION 5-FAR 3 L7:x15 N��"NZai�lyr: 4 �a rA - WALLB FAR WALL CALCULATIONS_ LOWER LEVEL _ 1 _ „) � EOfmover f 1,1 _. WALLF WALLu FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - LOWER LEVEL Ua�e�'-0� Ilne-val N crar sp- WALLA FAR WALL CALCULATIONS -LOWER LEVEL 5 6 _ o. WALL E WALL C FAR WALL CALCULATIONS WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA Oaf.) 66.88 TOTAL WALL AREA(s.f.) WALL A 129.09 WALL B 47.33 91.33 _ 112.95 WALL C 0 11.70 WALL D 46.21 WALL 4.49 18.37 1264 WALL F 38.51 TOTALS 149.68 433.37 MLLa % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL POSED WALL AREA =149.68 S.F. TOTAL WALL AREA=433.37 S.F. No WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA L-e SEFSL 11..11-1a 1493S 68 S.F. 14337 F.=USX 100=34.5% EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 269.85 S.F. s ra 269.85 S.F. X .345 = 93.09 S.F. COUNTING FAR LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 e=Iw• FAR CALCULATIONS 1 ..r,l. LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes Q 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 IT, x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.48 s.f. MAIN LEVEL 1116.19 s.L LOWER LEVEL 93.09 N.J. GARAGE 0s.E DECKS 103.47 s.f. TOTAL 1892.12 s.f 60.88 S.F.AVAILABLE FAR FOR DEVELOPMENT Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.L per SPA SOO.OD s.f. Existing Garage (Carport) 361.36 s.f. Available Garage FAR 138.64 s.f. Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 409.92 s.L Upper Level Deck_Area _ 36.84 s.f. Total Deck Area 47B.47 s.E 478.47 s.f. ( Total deck) - 375 s.L (Allowable deck) 103.47 N.J. 103.47 s.f. Counting towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURE , PIANNING L111111 -I u,ITIr cvi n c r Limos P�411 . \P II11 '15nOV ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME PARGEL61 ar awo x..n,«. Tom, ,e rwk FRamr NO zwziro owsglr nnnuiu..a a.o",v��n.a NEM71lLE FXIS7ING IDW CR FAR LE EL FAR CALCI ILATIONS 6-FAR1 O Eol6 NOPIA`Ws.''�b - « Im+ E s I�' WALL FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL16- 6 3:- - FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL 4 _11' MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN � WALL A FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL 1,1-p' WALL G WALL 0 FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALLDESH37 EXPOSED WALL AREA (s.f.) TOTAL WALL AREA(s.f.) WALL G 301.51 416.33 301.51 WALL H WALL i 469.86 113.50 171.93 WALL 56.81 111.14 WALL K 142.37 142.37 WALL L 56.40 17.37 56.40 WALL M 17.31 WALL N WALL 0 47.65 162.22 47.65 1 162.22 WALL P 235.38 235.38 1715.83 TOTALS 1549.54 .LLB % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 15,19.54 S.F. TOTAL WALL AREA = 1715.83 S.F. % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA tarpon Area = 1549.54 S.F. / 1716.83 S.F. = .900 X 100 = 90'A EXPOSED WALL AREA 36136. f LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1240.22 S.F. 1240.22 S.F. X .90 = 1116.19 S.F. COUNTING FAR AFAR CALCULATIONS 1 / Na Srolr FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR « 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception N340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 J. Garage 500 SE Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.48 s.f. MAIN LEVEL 1116.19 s.0 LOWER LEVEL 93.09 s.f. GARAGE 0s.f. DECKS 103.47s.i. TOTAL 1892.12 s.f. 60.88 S.F.AVAILABLE FAR FOR DEVELOPMENT Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 s.f. Existing Garage (Carport) 361.36 s.f. Available Garage FAR 138.64 F f. Existing Garage is <500 sF - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 409.92 s.f. Upper Level Deck Area _ 36.84 s.f. _ _ _ Total Deck Area 478.47 s.f. 478AT s.f. ( Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 1 D3,47 i f. 103.47 s.0 Counting towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING :E a VI cm:ulmn 1aMISA IATJV .h H a1211� TAIL rAla_1IA1111 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME PARCEL61 iqv.tilovA�P1611 re Iona 11112Lm LWGFLE. N111` FAIL Fi. A....... dux ENEn IIIEE EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR CAIL;Lf1AI IONS 6 - FAR2 un AL11 VVI,.W. 0-h'�m^a101�611 WALL WALL FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL `t eue'-Po' Deck Aree "iiGsr FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR _,, ,.ors a� �.— FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 50) Garage per SPA document. page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 J. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.0 x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.48 s.f MAIN LEVEL 1116.19 s.f LOWER LEVEL 9309sf GARAGE 0S.f. DECKS 103.47 s.f TOTAL 1892.12 s.f. 60.88 S.F.AVAILABLE FAR FOR DEVELOPMENT Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 s.f. Existing Garage (Carport) 361.38 s.f. Available Garage FAR 138.64 s.f. Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 409.92 vC Upper Level Deck Area 36.84 s.f. Total Deck Area 47B.47 RL 478.47 s.f. ( Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 103.47 s.f. 103.47 s.f. Counting towards FAR FAR CALCULATIONS pass ARCHITECTURE +PLANNING u Ls"',FAN"Im Inov M.4iI ItL\ IYn vtlu l:ALGo 111.1 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME PARCEL 61 Nmaon=I--I- sWEor NO nIII Pt 11t 1Ll wm r7L1 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR CAL0UTA'I1UNS 6 - FAR3 01 2 __UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN WALLIS LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. — NORTH ELEVATION 3/15'=1'D' I ''. `]11711 Nj.td w« nr or LL WALL C LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. —WEST ELEVATION 4 eb1'A' - -.- -- -... FAR Key ® 1-11.1B FAR o=,kA,,a I � Ca,pod Agee lOea9e, WALL A LOWER LEVEL WALL CALL. — EAST ELEVATION J ans.rn� ..� .. a,WALL 0 LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. — SOUTH ELEVATION -- WALL % AREAS — LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA is0 TOTAL WALLAREA(sR WALLA 6522 131.68 WALL a 2o.12 3796 WA LC o 131.68 WALL 1&25 379E i07AOr 106.57 339.28 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL E%POSEO WALL AREA =108 57 A TOTAL WALL AREA = 339.28 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALLAREA I TOTAL WALL AREA 106,57 if 1339.28 sf = 314 X 100 - 31 A % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = LOBE sf 136.39 six 314 = 42 83 51 COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone Dislntl- SPA- Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes a 2500 FAR x 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Co.,. 500 sf Decks =2500 s1 15=375 sf UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 992.50 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.035f GARAGE 0sf DECKS 150.92 of TOTAL 1763.72 sf 2500 sf allowable - 1763.72 existing = 736.28 sf AVAILABLE FAR FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Garage OalArIii G Allowable Garagesf par SPA 500,00sf Edslinq GPrage IQdryo11) 461.SO S: Avalable Oarupa kAR 38.18 sf brisling Garage Is <500 sL Garage Is axema from FAR Deck Calcmanon Main Level Dark Are 47372af Upper Level Deck Area 52.2E sf Total Deck Area 525925f 525.92 at (Total deck)- 375 sf(Allowable KeN 150925f 150.92 at Counting towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURE , PIANNING 7-1141 FMSTINJ "I I'AL YilATO4 tWhU IIG\'IeEll PARCAIC.L'ITT10T' ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Ovrt A w, RA.ml... alell vemecfao s¢m Dis ri usret4a. 111111n INIT7 LOWERLEVEL PAR CALC❑ATION 7-FAR 1 �1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (4 „�a FAR CALCULATION i WALL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - NORTH ELEVATION 3,Le._,,.o. — WALL I WALL G MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - WEST ELEVATION 3116'd'e' .PILE Main Level Enriched =111517 zf WALL l— + + + + DAck « � + + + + + + + + 2 or 47372 of \ + \ ++ r✓�Lti++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + 5 -r + + +++ + + + + + saach st 32of This area la exempt up to J2 a n. 2ss75o29 o.n wAa' umle MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 FAR Key ® Countinb FAR Deck Area 0 caeon Area (Garage) ® Sm:abe Foomµl WALL o WALL H 0 WALL E WALL K MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. -EAST ELEVATION 9 fJo" TES �•.+'i'"vy ++.u,G j`^4 'f :ana _;Is LLILL I l WALL WALL WALL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. -SOUTH ELEVATION ,D 3/l6'=1'0' WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL In I EXPOSED WALI. AREA (sQ TOWL WALL AREA has "ALLi WALLL WALL K WALL L TOTAIS % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA =1420 79 of TOTAL WALL AREA =1595,91 at sw WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA 1420.79 at 11595 91 at =.890 X LOS = 89D W EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1115.17 of 1115.17 sf X 890 = 992.50 of COUNTING FAR 1 FAR CALCULATION FAR CALCULATION Zone Oland- SPA- Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes AA 2500 FAR +50D Garage Per SPA document, page 22, Reception F340937 Alluw.LL. FAR FAR 25DO of Garage 5005f Decks -2500 of .15 = 375 of UPPER LEVEL 57747 of MAIN LEVEL 992SO or LOWER LEVEL 42.83 sf GARAGE 0of DECKS 150.92 ar TOTAL 176372s( 2500 sf allowable - 1763.72 existing = 736.28 sf AVAILABLE. FAR FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Gen.,. CogroulatA0 Allowable Garage of per SPA 500.00 sf Food, Garage (Callon) 46182sf Avaladle Garage FAR 36.18 at Existing Garage is 500 at- Garage is exempt from FAR Deck calculation Main Level Deck Area 473.72 at Upper Level DwIv Area 5220 of Total Deck Area 525.92 of 525.92 at Qotal deck)- 375 at (Allowable deck) 150V2of 150,92 of Counting towards EAR posy ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING ,gam r II've ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Os7 71 Aar,n .-g,- TaNi A,wN,%.IoMe, Blu11 in OWG ng lrvrts slsnnl�u_ uFn111LL I )NIT 7 MAIN LEVEL FAR CAI CLLAIION 7—FAR 2 G aols W»+�1T5cxe:. 2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A AR Key C—tere FAR 2TRA'iRRf pyy� Deck Nea Gai➢ort Area (Garage) WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION Deck Area 5220af Zone Dietrid- SPA - Aspen Meadows U Level -The entire level is above grade Upper Peer and counts towards FAR 11 homes pa 2500 FAR t 500 Garageper document, SPAA tlowmenl, page 22, Reception Y300937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 at Garage 500 If Decks =2500 at .15 = 375 If UPPER LEVEL 577A75t MAIN LEVEL gg2.50st LOWERLEVEL 42.035t GARAGE Osf DECKS 150925f 1 FAR CALCULATION TOTAL 176372 If 2500 sf allowable - 1763.72 existing = 736.28 Sf AVAILABLE FAR FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Garage Calculation Allowable Garage at Per SPA 50000 sf ErciSting Gdld9e lCalport).__ 451.02 sf Available Garage FAR 3518 If Existing Garage is <500 st- Garage Is erempl farm FAR Deck Calwlalion Main Level Deck Area 473725f Upper Level Deck Area 52.20 It Total Deck Area 525.92 If 525.92 If (Total deck)- 375 at(AllowaMe deck) 150.92 of 150.92 If Counting vessels FAR posy ARCHITECIDRIF + PLANNING for III - o1-i"1 FVFlIFO Ifileln7V`kol snits emnseolerr"a:unom ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL �. �timeo. etct I :�1111 NI UIS bel FILE. Li1rT7 20151i alEF11nL[ UNIT 7 UPPER LEVEL FAR CAL.CI. ILATION ? Iti 1MSI=41 0 w� WALL R LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. alls_1-p — NORTH ELEVATION _ e T1,111 IT WALL C �1 LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. Ualla-l.p— — WEST ELEVATION WALLA i-1 LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. — EAST ELEVATION iv-J an6d-o _- WALL D LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. — SOUTH ELEVATION A ;,a P ..u,�,„„r,r, 1. FAQ ® Counting FAR WALL % AREAS — LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION — EXISTING WALL DESIA. EXPUSED WALL ARE/(Sp TOTAL WALL -AREA (sQ Zone District SPA Aspen Meadows WALLA 6B.21 1 111.42 11 Town homes 92500 FAR. said Garage per SPA document, page 22, Ravi #340937 WALL _ 19.65 37 96 WALL _-_ 0 13168 WALL D 13.209 3J.96 Allowable FIR ., FAR 25005f Garage 500 s.f. TOTALS 106.16 339.02 --- UnexcavatM Cra Mspace Decks = 2590 s I. x.15 = 375 s.! FLOOKPIATE LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/le'd'o' Fla % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 10616 of TOTAL WALL AREA =33902 If Ya WALL AREA - EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA 106.16 sf 1339.02 If =.313 X 100 = 31.3 %EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE - 13629 sf 136.39IfX 317= 4269 s1 COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION UPPER LEVEL 57747vl MAIN LEVEL 100t42 sf LOWER LEVEL 42695f GARAGE 000 sf DECKS 159.35 sf TOTAL 1790.93 of 2500 sf available FAR - 1790.93 sf existing FAR = 709.07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Celoulatlon Allowable Garage s.f. par SPA 500,00 If Erclstlnp Garepe lCerpon _46182 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 of ENsling Cons, 6 PROS a - Garage a exempt from FAR Deck Colculallon Main Level Deck Area 50) 62 of Upper Level Deck Area __ 38.73s1 Total Deck Area 544.35 of 544.35 of (Total deck)- 375 s.C(Allowable deck) 169.35 an 169,35 of Counting per FAR posy ARCIII I LC IURE + PLANNING cnalt,.t :IIpLr. Ilrr I I11cC ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Trol 1. C!� xpelx I INIT 8 LOWER LEVEL. FAR CAL-0 LAI ION 8—FAR 1 Is If ) i WALL F r WALL I— U ek Area 50762 ar 6 MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - NORTH ELEVATION rrr.r WALL E WALL K MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - EAST ELEVATION � "a,b �2'•' \ 'v-:f•:vr": Y.:T'"£.ai}� _ _I'. _ ".I ,wxrnrs ur WALL i WALL G ) MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. WEST ELEVATION WALL k- UnA9 :.r "Poe, ryry r —rbi arr 2" r 1��..a�x �P. ':.��. M�l.� :w [rrrwar— FAR Key ® Conan, l AR U-1, Area Caryl Acre (Garage) ©1 �.r r,...r.r. WALL WALLJ WALL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - SOUTH ELEVATION WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL WALL WALL H % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA= 1512,09 51 TOTAL WALLAREA=1553.545f % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA 1512D9 sf f 16e3.54 sf =.890 X 190 = 59.8 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 111517 of 1115,17 at x 39 6%=1001 42 of COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION - EXISTING Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes g 2500 FAR , 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22. Reception 040937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Gee, 500 s.L Decks = 2500 s.t. x.15 = 375 5.1. UPPER LEVEL 577.470 MAIN LEVEL 1001.42 sf LOWER LEVEL 42695f GARAGE Ogg sf DECKS 169.35 sf TOTAL 1790,93 sf 2500 at available FAR - 1790.93 at existing FAR = 709.07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage or. per SPA 50000 st Ec,a., G..Gc(Carpor0 _ --- 1618Z Available Garage FAR 38.18 if F 'Sting Garage is c500 At Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculaton Main Level Deck Area 507.52 of O ", Lerel Deck Area _ _ 36.735f Total Deck Area 544 35 if 544355f(Pool deck)- 375 1.1. (Allowable deck) 16935 s1 169.35 sf Counting towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING nests ryi%, xna col o.:unou ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION I'.nrB 11rry^n AfendenvTrvnrclenn CID 11M LvrtO_EolSoar=M{ UNIT 8 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 8—FAR 2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FAR CALCULATION 1 / No 6wle Dona UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A WALL % AREAS — UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above gmde and counts inwards FAR FAR CALCULATION — EXISTING Zone Dotr d - SPA - Aspen Meatlows 11 Town homes 1112500 FAR a 500 Garage per SPA document. page 22, Reception 040937 AllowaLie FAR FAR- 25005t Gare9e 500 s.f. Oecks = 2500 s.f. x.15 = 3P5 sl. UPPER LEVEL 577,47 of MAIN LEVEL 1001.42If LOWER LEVEL 4289 sf GARAGE o.005f DECKS 16935a1 TOTAL 1790.92 sf 2500 sf available FAR-179D.93 sf existing FAR = 709.07 of available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowadlo Gerald S.t par SPA Rosso If E,rang (Ra,,,Larpod) __ 46182 at AVallabkl Garage FAR - - - 38.18 If Etis)Ing Garage is 15005.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Geicelallnn Main Level Deck Area 507.625f Seer Level Deck Area _ 3873 a( Total Deck Area - - 544.35 st 544.35 1 deck)- 3755.L(Allowable deck) iB9.355f he9.35 sf Counting )owards FAR FAR CALCULATION _ 1 M1e nle posy AHCHIIECTURE + PL9NNING In Irl asAvj � axH sea o9_ i'e lei faa p r Aa C IT C k 1 A nou ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION u.nx BI inrv..=T..Mow Lin Arai. V'nloMo, dlell O XOPm va r[IXX X l ", LEE IC,I slI'll ;4.r SHEPmLE 11NIT 8 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALOU A II ON 8-FAR 3 n I111 !r , tvear Eav 0 1 I, LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - NORTH ELEVATION 6 16'-1 g WALL C LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - WEST ELEVATION 4 d,16'=1'_C FAR Key ® Oauntlm FAR use—accd cle alsbaee WALLA LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - EAST ELEVATION -...oreoa WALL WALL LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - SOUTH ELEVATION WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL OESIG. LXPOBEO WALL AREA TOTAL WALLAREA(so WALLA _. - 94.11 12090 WALL 0 45.01 90.02 WALL U 12282 WALLO 8.69 52.45 1]91 37.59 :WALLE T01AL5 - _- _ 196.32 1 -423,75 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA136.32 sf TOTAL WALL AREA =423796f % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL ARE, I TOTAL WALL AREA 138.32 sf 1423,78 at =.322 X 100 = 32,2 b EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 316.02 sf 318.02 slX 32.3%=10111 sf COUNTING FAR 1 FAR CALCULATION FAR CALCULATION Zone Gland - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town h.bXX (P 2500 FAR. 500 Garage per SPA duwlnart page 22. Reception N340937 At nweble FAR FAR 2500 s.t. Garage 5005 f. Decks = 2500 s.c s.15 = 375 s r. UPPER LEVEL S71476f MAIN LEVEL 1422.525f LOWER LEVEL 10176 of GARAGE C.00 It DECKS 110.56 sf TOTAL 2212.115f 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2212.31 sf existing FAR = 287.69 sf available FAR for future development Garage calculation Allowable Garage sr per SPA 500.00 sf. Ecsfing Gerege(C."mi)_- 351.35 x f. Avallabk Garage FAR 138.54 s.f. Eg,ting Garage is <500 s.L-Games is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 422.02 at Upper Level Deck Area 62 R45f Total Deck Area 405.56 sf 485.559(Total deck)- 375 ME (Allowable deck) = 11058 sf 110.56 sf Counting towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURL + PLANNING a n}IS15 L Oh?}II PFlncl.11 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION ^I111 M..i.I.-. T.iia.-1.... Armen CnlnmM. alJll PROJECTNO rtm FU UNITS LOWER LUVEL PAN CAI CI IIATION 9 - FAR Oo I111 'Wii6ke�. 2 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN UL 3;16 _P.p MAIN LEVEL l Ift�l1, eree w� - a rmr L I Ti ILL CALC. - NORTH ELEVATION MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - WEST ELEVATION 4 3,E6ti1'.0' wAL I -ra.rw.rr seems rz- TEA' . � a I i k�. aa�ecrEa,a,a, 1 ww: :. m vm, .Yy"L ua 'Y Vy3.Fyr`A1 '. ✓2'r PTi}3 o- r N d-revue NJ. J +rck Ye N Y WALL --T-ssR� .a crem axc no -TW. a c u mo m.mm no.w.e I I a mu I nr.renumrewrr L1 ____________- +axeenueearnrm mer 5 LEVEL WALL CALC. -EAST ELEVATION 3rlfi'=1'0=1'.0' MAIN — off ffiOw.uw rcm ueL uru.mwe . 'r',r *`,-.. raw :see r� IS, raw. � gry "'f r r reru sA d.. 'iatiFi.E.n.: ys. } 1 r I f----------------- n,rrl WALL N MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - SOUTH ELEVATION GR 7Z C11nrlu9FAR Dark Area WALL %AREAS -MAIN LEVEL Carpnn Area Garage) WALL DUSIG EXFOSLI) WALL ARE is?) I TOIAL WALLA G WALL L WALL M % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA =1724.89 If H TOTAL WALLAREA-182900 or % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA 1724.59 IT 11829.40 If -.943 X 100 = 94 3 %EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1508 51 If 1508.51 5f X 94 3%-1422 52 5t COUNTING FAR Area iar FAR CALCULATION Zone Distinct- SPA -Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes a 2600 FAR t 500 Garage Far SPA document, page 22, Pool p340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500kf Garage SOOz,. Decks = 2500 sf. x A 5= 375 s C UPPER LEVEL 577 475f MAIN LEVEL 142252A LOWER LEVEL 10176 If GARAGE frO et DECKS 110.565f. TOTAL 221231 If 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2212.31 at existing FAR = 287.69 sf available FAR for future development Car.,. calculation Allowable Garage S.I. per SPA 500.00 a.! assume Goammicarpot, 36L365.f. Available Garage FAR 13884 of Exialinq Garage is 1500 s! - Garage Ia exempt from FAR Deck Gaterie lon Main Level Deck Area 422.62 s1 Upper Level Deck Area 52.945f Total Deck Area 485.56 sf 485,56 at Probst deck)- 375 If(Allowable deck)= 110.56 In 110.58 at Counting towards FAR posy MCHITECIDRE - PIANNING 17ilfl _ aaro4V.l'LAf1> A oti f arr ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Yl Aipo xlwlov'r el l�nr PROJE07NO mr SHUT LET UNT 9 MAIN LEVEL FAR GALA NATION 9—FAR 2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1 FAR CALCULATION EnLv f 'cIM— c FAR CALCULATION Zane Dlstnd - SPA - Aaron Meadows 11 Town homes dV 2500 FAR s 500 Genaye per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 at Garage 500 ad. Dan" = 2500 A . a A 5 = 375 st. UPPER LEVEL 577,47 st MAIN LEVEL 142252 IT LOWER LEVEL 10176 st GARAGE 0005t DECKS 110.55 st TOTAL 2212.31 Of 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2212.31 sf existing FAR = 287.69 sf available FAR for future development Garage. Calculation Allowable Garage N.J. per SEA 500 00 s f. Exa ngG _ 361365.(. nalCerpord Available Garage FAR 13864 s.t. Eziming Garage is 500AT` .- Gerege Is emmpt from FAR Deck Celndi rion Main Laval Deck Area 42262 st Upper Level Deck Area 6294 sr Total Dens Area 4a6.56 NOT 485,56 at (Total di- 3755f(Allowable deck) 11056 at 110.56 at Counting towards FAR WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upcer Level. The entlfe Upcer level -s above grade and Counts towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE I PIANNING 3ra 4N Bur.. Inw 171515 E 0. AL�I:14T�1V ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Lt A (T) rWlRtno Ml FP INN Y_ or5niI., m nitro[ I)NIT 9 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 9-FAR 3 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN -_EXISTING FAR CALCULATION T LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION WALL 11 'n ' ww WALL F socs— L Be LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION FAR Key ® Courtrg FAR WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL Leek Area WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREARL, TOTAL WALL ARE WALLA 3900 Level1 Lower Deck - _ WALLB 0 00 42.L 42.11 =2J811 a! _ WALL C27,71 -� 69,00 Lovrer Level I Irnplale WALL 2963 38.33 =127200 sf A WALL — 13SAD P2.BT WALL '.I'^r', WALLF 204A0 204.00 WALL WAL_LG 42.30 42.38 WALL II 129]5 5.25 WALL 207.31 24245.25 Dab WALLI O.OD 37315 .aP TOTALS 779.18 - iJ56.50 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL ' TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 779.18 of / e TOTAL WPLL AREA = iJ56.50 s1 %. WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA - 779.10 51 / 1355.50 sf =.5T4 X 100 = 57.4 %EXPOSED WALL AREA Cl LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE= 1272.00 sf 1272.00 sf %574 = 730.13 AT COUNTING FAR WALL D FAR CALCULATION Znne Diener - SPA - Aspen Meatlows 11 Town homes @ 25Do A FAR 4 500 AT Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception 040937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 At Deck, =2500 sf FAR 15= 376 of UPPER LEVEL 815005t MAIN LEVEL 120208 of LOWER LEVEL 730A3 At GARAGE 000,1 DECKS 40722 zf TOTAL 3154,41 sf 3144.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 654.41 sf over allowable FAR Garage Cal glatian Allowable Garage s.l, per SPA 500.00 st Eursling Garage N ICaop) _. 4592B,f Avallable Garage FAR 4972 of Ensuing Garage 459.28 At 1500 s.L -Allowable Garage Garage Is exempt room FAR Deck Calcmaron Lower Leval Deck Area 23gd1 if Main Level Doak Area 239.11 of Upper Level Deck Area(12800 sf 41T600 s0 304.00 of Total Deck Area 762.22 sf 782.22 sf ( Total deck) -3T5 sf (Allowable deck) 407 22 at = 40122 sf Deck Area Counting ImAr s FAR posy ARCHITECTUREPLANNING tg� o ..mt..1 lo... li-this 1Ii F%1A11Uwunov e _1 _ . n TICl3AT10N ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTFETOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION L4nm I OI Trv•rm 1wnAoiklao remrerao umrllp muret:er SHEITuTLE UNIT 10 LOWER LF VEI, FAR CALCULAT ON 10-FAR 2 Um ,,Srjj% rrxnetcr_ C 1, I -, -L — rfrn �" n c T rr X uu rary r v.�-E WALL E WPILB— wiLLA WALL WALLA LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. — SOUTH ELEVATION —_ WALLJ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Afi Key Counfine FAR Deck Area Lrwe, Level Flomplate 11120on1 WALL. WALL H Each l�9aP` I CI. I + — - _. r ee.�cieuI-�ry - _ - a -W o ,a�-°ad" - WALL WALL) LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. — EAST ELEVATION 11.1i D' WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WAI L AREI(s0 TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALLA 0.00 39.00 WALL ! EDD 42.17 WALL 27.71 69.00 WALL D 29.63 38,33 WAILF 131 tII B] WAI F 204.00 204.00 WALIG 4238 4238 WALLH 12975 12975 WALLi 2PL31 24525 WALL TOTALS I ]]9.18 135650 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA 779.1 B If TOTAL WALL AREA=135650 s1 % WALL AR LA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA _ ])9.18 sf 1135650 sl = 5]4 X 100 = 574 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE= 1272,005f 1272.00 sf X 574 = 730.13 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION 1 1 , NO SnIe FAR CALCULATION Zone Dialrcl- SPA- Aspen Mastless 11 Town bores @ 2500 at FAR t 500 st Garage per SPA document page 29, Reception #34093) Allowa0le FAR FAR 2500 of Oarage 500 if Dark, =2500 At FAR 15= 3755f UPPER LEVEL 815.OG sf MAIN LEVEL 1202.05 if LOWER LEVEL 730.13 sf GARAGE 000 if DECKS 407.22 s1 TOTAL 3154A1 of 3144.50 EExistrig FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 654.41 sf over allowable FAR Game CEIRA.1 . Allowable Garage e.f per SPA 500.00 of Ex' enq Gard9e lCausd) " 4592051 FAR Availai Garage" 40 T25f Duisbn0 Garage 458.20 5t <500 s.l Allowable Garage Garage is c.ampt Irom FAR Deck Calculali0e Lower Laval Deck Area 23911 sf Main Level Deck Area 239,11 s1 Upper Level Deck Area(12860 at+ 1]6➢05D 304.005f Total Deck Area )82.22 s1 ]82225f(Total deck)- 375 sf (Allowable deck) 40722 sf =40T22 sf Deck Anne Creatin0 Imande FAR posy ARCHIFECI RE+PLANNING u SA a IF w 1111 .11 L 11i en.. iicL II Lul nuv ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION .Mr [n1oMo. 61o1 • ramenxO 1w11 m son FILE 6-11unit UNIT IU LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCPLATION 10-FAR 1 ©Alf I�Jre'�r�i�q¢ f Mein Level R—plift rz41 e9 ar IL WALLS WALL 4 Y15-1'-0 MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION . - FAQ ® Counin9l AK Deck Area Pna� 0 areas Araa r--s VLIULo .LL 0 0 + + WALLT.. Pr wAus - + � — .... + + i + + + + + + + + + i + + + + r + f crane +++++ +++ ++ + ♦ + G. + + I ape Flpp plat 3+++ 45Y LS s1 } 1--;+ WAu v MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 0 WALL WALL C pass ARCHITECTURE+ PLANNING a=1 w i MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION .-L, WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL IIG L L%PUSED WALL AREA (I* TLL AI OTA I. WA J04.9T I 304.67 45,17 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 190918 If TOTAL WALL AREA=19T2.955f % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA = 1909,1801 19T2 95 sf =.966 X 100 = W.6 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1241 SO sf 1241,80 if X 968-1202.06 If COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION FAR CALCULATION Zone District SPA -Aspen Meadows 11T I.... L#25o0If FAR 50o If Garage par EPA d ant, page 22 RecogAn#340937 Allowable FAR FAR 25005f Garage 5005f decps =2500 of FAR x.15= 375 of UPPER LEVEL 315.DO 5f MAIN LEVEL 1202,M If LOWER LEVEL 730.13 If GARAGE 0,005f DECKS 40722 If TOTAL 3154.41 If 3144.50 Existing FAR- 2500 Allowable FAR = 654.41 st over allowable FAR Garaoc Galwlnl0n Allawaek Geregesfper SPA s000o If Existing GaraOe(Carpore 45928 If AvadaEle Garage FAR 40.`25f Eusl ng Garage 45SILS If 1500 s1. -AllOweble Garage Garage Is exempt fro. FAR Deck CMILIM an Lower Level Deck AMn 239.11 If Man Level Deck Area 239.11 If Upper Level Deek ANd(125,00 sf+ 176.00 on 304De 51 TOtal Deck Araa T8212 sf I6222 If(TOral deck) 375 If(Allowable deck) 407 225f = 407.22 IN Deck Area Counting inwards FAR ILL. 111,1 FkIIIID FIR fil1f.I111,11 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION l'mr In 101 Tm.md Tonnlmm<Lv.. L w., c"bmao emu xoalx III I, a, .I ILI urn, ouneu ., sx411nLL UNIT 10 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCI ILATION 10- FAR 3 'k-4. r;VitHer, d If I MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION _ FA_D me, ® counting FAR Lack Area Mein Level fleck Area— =239.11 of Garage Area — WALL u =Main Level Floorplate —� w"LLN 1241 BO s1 WALLO AeLLV� WALL IT wnu.i P + + +++ ''.+ + + + + + + + + + + 'I + + + + + + + + I+ ♦ + + + + + 1 1 1 + L_. __.. .. (aerage wALLo ++++ + + + + + + .. + + t + + + + + + + + GG mgee Floorpl t + + + + + + + + I =4592B e1 + \ WALL e MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 sl,,.I'-0' WALL WALL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL 14276 3B1.47 WALL R WALL S WALL WALL U WALL °/D MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 19o9A8 sf TOTAL WALL AREA=1972.95 At a WALL AR EA= EXPOSED WALL AREA/TOTAL WALL AREA 190918 st / 1972 95 st=.968 X 100 = 96.8IF EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE=1241.00 5t 1241 80 st X 968 =1202,08 if COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION 1 No 6caln I WALL V FAR CALCULATION Zane District- SPA - Aspen Mee ll 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR +500 sf Garage per SPA mcument page 22 Receplloa tt34o93I Allowable FAR FAR 2500 at Garage 500ef Desks=2500si FARx. 15= 3755f UPPER LEVEL 515.00 At MAIN LEVEL REX W of LOWER LEVEL 730,73 at GARAGE 000 at DECKS 40I.22 of TOTAL 315401A 3144.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 554.41 6f over allowable FAR Go flge Cell Allowable Garage J. per SPA 500.00 If ExIYAG q ICMyotl) 45928 of Available Garage FAR 40]2 of Easting Gam, 459.20 at 500 s.f Allowable Garage Garage is exempt (Am FAR Dock Calculation Lower Level DeckM A 239,119 Man Level Di Area 23911 at Upper Level Deck Area(128005f 1176000° 304.0011 Total Deck Area 782 22 at 782,22 sf (Total beck)- 375 at(Allowable Deck) 407.22 of = 407,22 sl Deck Area Counting towards FAR posy ARCHITECTORL+ PLANNING o�reNm TAR 1,11lr11l111111I'll ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Aernr Wlcodu 81611 1 0 IlIZ1 CC TILE ",I lb :DISMi`. iI..L SHEET n11E UNT 10 MAIN LEVEL FAR C.AL.0 IAI ION 10-FAR 4 ONE &lieSgi dFtifiK�: s 1 FAR Noy ® Counting FAR beck Area Upper Level Rearplatc B15 nO l FAR CALCULATION - zone olslncl-SPA-Aspen Meadows ' 11 Town themes (v] 2500 If FAR- 500 If Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception A340837 Allowable FAR -" FAR 2500 If _, r'" Garflya 500 If {� Decks-25005f FAR x.l5= 3756f C UPPER LEVEL 81500 If MAIN LEVEL 1202.06If LDWER LEVEL 73013 at GARAGE 0.00 If al DECKS 40722 If a rI Ba1b TOTAL 3154.41 If I 3144.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 654.41 sf - MMM fff::: - over allowable FAR Garage, Cakulabon _....1 Allowable Garage slper SPA 500005f se 'in Garage S on _ 458 2A sf Available Garage FAR 40,72 at Earring Gareyem <5005l-Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR --'. Deck Calculation Lower Leve6eck Area 238.it st '., Main Level Deck Area 238.11 sf --- --- Upper Level Deck Are@ F 28005f a 1760050 _30400It Total Deck Area 702.22 IF 782.22 If (Total dock)- 3755r(Allowable deck) 401.22 If Upper Level Deck Area =dOL2251 Deck Area Counting towards FAR 1e oo 5f WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Le The entire Upper level's above grade and counts towards FAR UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FAR CALCULATION 1 posy ARCH HIURE I PIANNING 11 LL; L L I. ALCArIATO\ ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION I.r In I It T, . T . .r A rc r ovlonAn 91[I I 11.lIT xd. n5L In .I Fit Nn o_ snm2a.e urnmlr UNIT ID UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10- FAR 5 O 015 {'pi/ry'7QrR:oAWt xI m P • ir LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. -NORTH ELEVATION LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN L I 116'=1-0' 51 WALL WALL mu'rw.re. WALL LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION WALL °/D AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WAI L DES . EXPOSED WALL AREA (5D TOTAL WALLAREA (ol WALLA _ WALL B_ -WALL 0.00 41.72 O.DO 4477 C - WALL° 62.01 _ 77.61 _ 40.50 16]e3 20475 4TIM 129,00 27250 23.23 _ WALL _ -WALL F WALL WALLA WALL i 167.03 204.75 4708 129.00 23457 WALL Der) Wee i07AlS 666.4] 1391.]6 _ IN LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 86847 It TOTAL WALL AREA =1391 76 5f % WALL ARE = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA w411 = 868.47 If, 1391 76 If = 624 X 100 = $2.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE -12T2.o0 If 1272.00 If X .624 = 793.73 If COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION 1 / Nosoui. FAR CALCULATION Zone District- SPA Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes OP 2500 sf FAR+500 sf Garage par SPA document. page 22, Reception#340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 If rag Gae 500 If Oocks=2500 If FAR z, 11- Ta If UPPER LEVEL 665.00If MAIN LEVEL 12W.25If LOWER LEVEL 793735f GARAGE OOO sf DECKS 230.095f TOTAL 2903.67 If 2865.00 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 at over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage 11. per SPA 50000 If Exialinq Ga.,.(CareoN 459.28 If _ Available Garage FAR 40.72 If Esiehrg Garage 459.28 If 1500 11, -Almwable Garage Garage X exempt from FAR Deck calculation Lower Leval Deck Area 4600 If Main Level Deck Area 239.11 If Upyel Level Deck Aea(154.38 If, 178.0050 330,581 Total Deck Area 61369 It 613.695r(TMal deck)- 375 If (Allowable beck) 238.69 If - 23869 of Deck Area Ooun5n9 towards FAR posy ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING see �e��..�� rear u.re ro.00.ox r�rn c�,wl.m o241 11111LuenaC All oIILOI ca=.a.0 Iwluw lAnrelc.ulanou ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION ill Lk Amu, Col.wla. B1611 WwRTAJ nrurc fM6rfIL11_ nI5M1E.lxe vC`mn UNIT 11 LOWER LEVEL FARO Cl IIATION 11 -FAR 1 u a IT LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION 4 3116'=, WALL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN UG aps=I'A WALL WALL 4s.a� LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION J 3/l6_I r WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL DE51G. I EXPOSED WALL AREA (SO I TOTAL WALLAREf % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 868.47 If TOTAL WALL AREA=139176 or %WALL AR EA = EXPOSED WALL AREA 7 TOTAL WALL AREA = 86847 sf / 1391.76 at = 624 X 100 = 624 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE=1272,00 at 1272.00 sf X 624 = 793,73 or COUNTING FAR 1 FAR CALCULATION FAR CALCULATION Zone Distric CPA-Aspenw,ximes 14 Town homes A 2500 If FAR a 500 If Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 If Garage Soo sr Dark. =2500 sr FAR x.15= 37551 UPPER LEVEL 66500st MAIN LEVEL 120625 If LOWER LEVEL 793T3 of GARAGE OOo sf DECKS 238,69 of TOTAL 2903.67 If 2865.00 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 of Eeslin, Garage(Ca1porg 45828 If _ Available Garage FAR 4072If EXIng Garage 45928If c 500 If, -Allowable Garage Garage A Wa np frtm FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area 44.00If Main Level Deck Area 2Sa11 at Ugger Level Geck Aka (154.3B sf a 17(sp 330.50 si Turn Dark Area at 3.69 of 613.69If(7da1 seek)- 375 If (Allowable deck) 235.69If = 238.69 s1 Deck Area Counting towed, FAR posy ARCNII EC LRE+ PLANNING l:u -'I, ea=lwoeIn, ILL L 11 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION 1- II III T-- T.L pc Colorer, e1111 tri vkmmlxo umro Icrn1_II A81 7 1, .111lI. UNIT 11 LOW ER LEVEL FAR L;ALCI ILA I lON 11 -FAR2 OR" dYFaRi3tV.Fm 4 C +-Wlza— MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION FAR N y � ® Conning FAR ck A— MclnLevelDeck Area =239,11of _ "0" Garage Are, WALLL WALL M innrnl�rv_ GAD.N Parr u Nhhcn F a + IT + .L 1 �WA LLR ++T+T ++T - +i ++ + --. r l . + + + + + 1 'age + + + ♦ + yaiLa+ �H4 + + + i wall O + + + + T + - + + + + Gerape Fla dale ✓ 1 + + + als Wn el 1i +. t + +... +.-5.....1 � w I MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Ua,16-1a —4.��I era WALL T WALL R WALL P MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION Ylb'-1'Y' % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 205817 51 TOTAL WALL AREA 21466T51 % WALL AR Re = EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA = 2088.17 If 12145.6T 11= B12 X 100 = 9T 2 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE=1241.80 51 1241.50 If X.W 2 -1206,25 s1 COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION U pa FAR CALCULATION Zone DislriO-SPA-Aspen Wandows 11 Town homes an 2500 s1 FAR +500 5( Garage per SPA document, page 22, Recepllon #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 If Garage 50051 .be"-2500 Or FAR x.15= 375sr UPPER LEVEL 665.0051 MAIN LEVEL 120E 25 s1 LOWER LEVEL 793.73 If GARAGE 0.0051 DECKS 23889 s1 2865.00 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation All bla Garage J. per SPA 500.00 If Eviethan Garage O".qL_ 45920 e1 Available Garage FAR 4072 or Existing Garage 45928 e1 < 500 5I - Allowable Garage Garages exempt tram FAR Deck Collculeton Lower Level Dack Area 44.00 If Man Level Deck Area 239,11 s1 Upper Level Deck Area(154.3851+T76.00s0 330.585f Tons Deck Ame 61369 s1 613.69st(Tolaideck)-375s1(AlloWabledeck) 23S 69 s1 = 239 69 IF Deck Ask Counting Ewerds FAR poss ARCHITE61 URE + PLANNING r5 �2'".,� A;PCL1`CtnAiION Md1r F L .0 11A,IVN ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION l vir ll PPWEU NO I'll, Fie NOII EI_ aI V WLA.a .In Irm UNIT 11 MAIN LEVEL FARCI CULATION 11 -FAR3 G1 1 "rX'nlh,R"� CA f, C -( WALL M 4 MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. — NORTH ELEVATION IAA eL_C_C_G Counting FAR Oed Arc. Mae Level. -I, Area 11 sf Ga[d90 Area -239. '0' WALL L POLL K i WALLM r Rf MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 3ne=r-o-o 9 e .,. 9 WIWII.. Q`111_rare _ m�r r. 9. ,.... MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. — WEST ELEVATION WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL OE31G. EXPOSED WALL AREA (s9 TOTAL WALL AREA (SR WALL K 272.02 2Iz.02 WALLL 251.14 251.14 WALLM 6859 68.59 WALLN 162.60 162,66 NALL0 496.37 496,37 WALLP 170.22 17C22 WALL❑ 222.58 22258 WALLA 132.80 HIRD WALLS 54.74 5474 WALL 6695 7845 --_ WALL 12343 12343 WALLV TOTALS 2088.1J 2148.6J % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA=2088.1T of TOTAL WALL AREA=214867 sf % WALL AS EA - EXPOSED WALL AREA I TOTAL WALL AREA = 2088.1) of 12148 B) of = 9)2 X 1OO = 9] 2 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1241,80 If 1241.80 Sf X.972 =1206 25 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION 1 no sr.l. FAR CALCULATION — — —_ ea Zone Disfacl-saA-Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 of FAR t Soo of Garage per ORA document, page 22, Reception a340 WJ Allowable FAR FAR 2500 of Garage 50D sf Decks=2500 of FAR x.15- 3755f UPPER LEVEL 666,00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1206.25 sf LOWER LEVEL )93)3 sf GARAGE 0.00 at DECKS 238695f 2865.O0 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation All=10 Gaage sJ.par SPA SOD OD sf Exislino Garage (Caro on 459285f Available Garage FAR 4052 sf Existing Garage 45928 of <500 5 f. - AlluredWu Gin age Garage Is exempt from FAR Deck Calculat on Lowen Larval Deck Area 44,00 st Main Level OeckAree 23911 of Upper Level Deck Area (154.38 of a 98.00_st, 330 58 at Total Deck Area 513.69 of 61369 sf(Total di- 375 of (Allowable deck) 238.69 of - 238.69 of Deck Area Coupling towards FAR i I.:w L IS llio lll. .11111,IATn)N Ca_ry15 11111D5ANCALI:rInON ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION ar .. m.ele,1,w,. Pe Cia0. rva IT 11IT 11_!OIAll 1, UNIT 11 MAIN EVFL FAR CALCULATION 11 - FAR 4 0 D Gxk Roof below I, 0eqb below 'L U Per 1 —1 Deck Are. — �j 2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1b FAR CALCULATION zone Dianot SPA -Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes (L 2600 if FAR a 600 st Farago per SPA document, page 22. Recepilon MU0937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garega S00 of Dells=2500 sf FAR x.15= 315sf UPPER LEVEL 66500 at MAIN LEVEL 120825 of LOWER LEVEL 793,73 of GARAGE 000 sf DECKS 2J8,69 of TOTAL 290357 sf 2865.00 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 If over allowable FAR Santa. CeK.Stna, Albwaole Garage s.f Per SPA 50o005f Enebno Garage(CxtpoE4 Avalable Geroge FAR— 40]2sf Existing Garage 459,28 At a 5005 [ - Allowable Garage Garages exe RM from FAR Deck CelgAalion Lower Level Deck Area 44.00 of Main Level Deck Area 239 f 1 at DR. Level Deck Area (15438 of a 176.00 D 33058 sf Total Lack Area 513.69 of 61369 or (Total deck)- 375 at(AlIdeable deck) 238.69 of = 238,69 of Deck Are. Conning towards FAR WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL_ Front Level- The entire Upper havens above grade and mums towards FAR 1 FAR CALCULATION pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PIANNING I Im ...r9 na.9-li Fr\4[ll lr fAllr I",,l,I L4TFV ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION III nw..iwnlmmo I..i. i „Col�mdo, X1611 xtaTM 9smmlxs. Lalro ear nlF v.vn a s9srerzm; .1111E UNIT 11 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 -FAR5 RECEIVEL) 1%W FEB 2 2 2016 CITY OF ASPEN PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY CITY OF ASPEN C(?411:ml y ,D t j�N PLANNER: Sara Adams, 429-2778 DATE: August 10, 2 1 PROJECT: Aspen Meadows, Lot 5 Trustee Townhomes Updated 1/13/2016 - SN REPRESENTATIVE: John Sarpa DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is interested in amending the 1992 Aspen Meadows SPA (recordation # 340937). SPA amendments are processed according to the Planned Development Chapter of the Land Use Code. The 1992 SPA approved the ability to increase the size of 8 existing townhouses to 2,500 sf each, and the construction of 3 new townhouses to be 2,500 sf each. A maximum floor area of 27,500 sf was set for the 11 townhouses on Lot 5. The approval documents also specified a maximum of 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms per townhouse. Floor area calculations for Lot 5 are in accordance with the Land Use Code in place at the time of building permit application. Three of the 11 existing townhomes were built with a floor area that exceeds that 2,500 sf size cap while two of the 11 townhomes measure below the 2,500 sf size. It is believed that these two properties have been sterilized of the ability to achieve greater floor area than what is currently on - site, as the remaining floor area was sold or transferred to the three properties that are over 2,500 sf. The Applicant is asked to provide evidence that speaks to this issue and shows these residences were legally established, in the form of approval, building permit, or other. The Applicant is interested in amending the 1992 approval to 1) allow the six properties not referenced above to achieve the 2,500 floor area cap for each property, as calculated under current code; 2) to memorialize the floor area of the 5 aforementioned properties (two are under the 2,500 sf size cap / three are over the 2,500 sf size cap); and 3) to remove the language regarding the overall floor area cap, as this may create conflicts in regard to how floor area is calculated as the code is amended from its current calculation method. The applicant is also interested in removing the bedroom and bathrooms limitation in the SPA, which is not relevant to the current Land Use Code. The limitation on bedrooms was related to growth management mitigation at the time (see part E(6) of the recorded SPA). Staff recommends that Growth Management mitigation for any expansion be addressed during the Planned Development amendment and that the units be subject to the Growth Management regulations in effect at the time of land use application/building permit application submittal, whichever is first. School Lands Dedication fees shall be assessed for the expansions at the time of building permit application. Amending the dimensional requirements requires a Minor Amendment to Project Review approval by City Council. As a project that does not increase the total number of residential units, it is exempt from the City's Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) requirements. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: ASLU PD Amendment Trustee Townhomes 1 v.. ..r Land Use App: Land Use Code: http:l/www.aspenpitkin. com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenVP]anning-and-Zoningf-Fitle-26- Land-Use-Code) Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.445.110(D) Planned Development Amendments, Minor Amendment Project Review 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements Review by: Staff for complete application City Council for review and approval Public Hearing: Yes, at City Council Neighborhood Outreach: Yes, Staff recommends an enhanced public notice mailing. Planning Fees: Planning Deposit - $4,550 Referral Fees: none. Total Deposit: $4,550 (for 14 hours, additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour) To apply, submit the following information: Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. ✓ Pre -application Conference Summary (this document). A copy of the approved PD documents for the Aspen Meadows Townhomes. ✓ dress and legal description of the parcel on which development i e to occur, consis m rrent (no older than 6 months) ce ' ' om a title insurance company, an ownership and enc re o rney licensed to practice in the State of 1�44446rtgages, judgments, liens, easement c s and agreements affecting the pa demonstrating the o ' . to apply for the Development Application. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. HOA Compliance form (Attached) V 2 ,%W ... /A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. ./A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. / Written responses to all review criteria. /An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: ❑ 10 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. Number of copies correlates to referral agencies and review boards. ❑ Total deposit for review of the application. ❑ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested rig ht. >r .r Date: March 8, 2016 7Lj THE CITY or ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for Aspen Meadows Townhomes Minor Planned Development Amendment— Project Review and reviewed it for completeness. ❑ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. 6/your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete. Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. • $4,550 Fee/Deposit • One additional hardcopy of complete application • One digital copy in PDF format of complete application Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2741 if you have any questions. Thank/You, D '—� llary S is . Planner ity en, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No Subdivision, or PD (creating more than I additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. Lodging '*W VOW Date: March 1.2016 7Lj THE CITY of ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for Aspen Meadows Townhomes Minor Planned Development Amendment — Project Review and reviewed it for completeness. Ed Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the following missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Provide complete existing floor area calculations for Lot 5. Provide a full-sized survey including a slope analysis of the property. A slope analysis is required to determine the allowed floor area for the lot. As the majority of the site has been disturbed, the survey shall include a slope analysis using pre -development topography. ❑ Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete. Please submit the following to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2741 if you have any questions. That* You, ill i ick, Planner City o spen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD vtL Yes No N Subdivision, or PD (creating more than I additional lot)ytG` GMQS Allotments Residential 0. c- Affordable Housing v't�_ Yes No 7 Commerciale r=_ E.P.F. tiro.. Lodging ✓t c— �L1E'q� 4'S �`'r � �'iy �� `� �e ABBREVIATIONS ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS GENERAL NOTES PROJECT DIRECTORY poss ARCHITECTURE +PLANNING A.F.F. above finished floor ACOUS. acoustical ADD. addendum ADDTL. additional ADJ. adjustable AGG. aggregate A/C air conditioning ALT. alternate ALUM. aluminum A.I.A. American Institute of Architects A.B. anchor bolt APPROX. approximate ARCH. architect (ural) A.S.I. architect's supplemental instructions ASPH. asphalt AUTO. automatic BSMT. basement BM. beam BRG. bearing BTWN. between BITUM. bituminous BLK. block BLKG. blocking BD. board B&B board and batten BTM. bottom B.O. bottom of B.O.F. bottom of footing BLDG. building CAB. cabinet CANT. cantilever(ed) CPT. carpet CSMT. casement CLG. ceiling C.J. control joint CEM. channel C.B.U. cementitious backer unit CHNL. center CTR. center C. L. center line CM centimeter CER. ceramic CLR. clear (ante) CLO. closet CO.S. carbon monoxide detector COL. column COMB. combustion CONC. concrete C.M.U. concrete masonry unit CONST. construction C. D. construction documents CONT. continuous CONTR. contract/contractor CORR. corrugated CU.FT. cubic foot CUND. cubic yard D deep D. L. dead load DEMOL. demolish DER depress (ed) D. D. design development DTL. detail DIA. diameter DIAL. diagonal DIV. division DOC. document DR. door D. H. double hung DN. down D. S. downspout DWR. drawer DWG. drawing D.W. dishwasher EA. each E east ELEC. electric (a0 EL. elevation ELEV. elevator ENCL. enclose (ure) ENG. engineer EQ. equal EQUIP. equipment EXH. exhaust EXIST. existing EXP. expansion EXT. exterior EXTN. extend, extension E. 1. F. S. exterior insulation finish system F.O. face of F.O.C. face of concrete F.O.S. face of stud FIN. finish (ed) FIN.FLR. finished floor F. P. fire place F. R. fire resistance rating FLSHG. flashing FLEX. flexible FLR. floor F.A.R. floor area ratio F. D. floor drain FLUOR. fluorescent FTG. footing FND. foundation FRMG. framing FRZ. freezer GA. guage G.A. Gypsum Association GALV. galvanized GSKT. gasket G.C. general contractor GL. glass/glazing(glazed) G.W.B. gypsum wall board GYPC. gyperete GYP.PL. gypsum plaster GYP.T. gypsum tile H/C handicap accessible R.O.W. right of way HDW. hardware R. riser HDR. header R. D. roof drain HTG. heating RM. room HVAC heating/ventilation/ R.O. rough opening air conditioning R.S. rough sawn H. high HT. height H. PT. high point HEX. hexagonal H.B. hose bibb SCHED. schedule H.C. hollow core SECT. section H. M. hollow metal SHTHG. sheathing HORIZ. horizontal SHT. sheet HR. hour SIM. similar H.W.H. hot water heater S. D. smoke detector / storm drain (site) / schematic design INCL. include (ing) S.C. solid core 1. D. inside diameter S.T.C. sound transmission INSUL. insulation coefficient INT. interior S south INTERM. intermediate SPKR. speaker INV. invert SPEC. specification (s) SQ. square ST. STL. stainless steel STD. standard STA. station STND. SM. standing seam JT. joint STL. steel JST. joist STOR. storage STRUCT. structure / structural SUSP. suspended SYM. symmetrical KIT. kitchen SYS. system K.O. knock out TEL. telephone T.V. television LBL. label THK. thick (ness) LAB laboratory THR. threshold LAM. laminate(d) T.B.D. to be determined LAV. lavatory T.P.D. toilet paper L. H. left hand dispenser LT. light T.P.H. toilet paper LT.WT. light weight holder LTL. lintel TOL. tolerance L. L. live load T&G tongue and groove L. PT. low point T.O.C. top of column top of concrete T.O.F. top of footing T.O.L. top of ledge M. H. manhole T.O.J. top of joist MFR. manufacture (er) T.O.S. top of slab MAS. masonry T.O.W. top of wall M.O. masonry opening T.B. towel bar MATL. material T tread MAX. maximum TYP. typical MECH. mechanical MED. medium M.BR. master bedroom MEMB. membrane MEZZ. mezzanine U.B.C. Uniform Building Code MTL. metal UC. undercut M meter UNFIN. unfinished MM millimeter U.N.O. unless noted MIN. minimum otherwise MISC. miscellaneous UL Underwriters MOD. modular Laboratories, Inc. MLDG. moulding MT. mount MTD. mounted MULL. mullion V.R. vapor retarder VAR. varies / variable VERT. vertical NAT. natural VEST. vestibule N. R. noise reduction V.G. vertical grain N.R.C. noise reduction V.I.F. verify in field coefficient V.C.T. vinyl composition tile NOM. nominal VNR, veneer N north NFPA National Fire Protection Association N.I.C. not in contract N.T.S. not to scale WSCT. wainscot W.C. water closet W. P. waterproofing W.W.F. welded wire fabric O.C. on center W.W.M. welded wire mesh OPNG. opening W west OPP. opposite W. width / wide OPP.H. opposite hand WDW. window OPP.S. opposite surface W/ with W/0 without 0. D. outside diameter WD. wood OA. overall W.PT. working point 0. H. overhead O.S.H.A. Occupational Safety & Health Administration PTD. painted SYMBOLS USED AS PNL. panel ABBREVIATIONS: PAR. parallel PKG. parking angle PERF. perforated centerline PERIM. perimeter C channel PLAS. plaster d penny P. LAM. plastic laminate _L perpendicular PL. plate PL plate PLYWD. plywood 0 diameter PT. point L angle P.T. pressure treated PVC polyvinyl chloride NUMERICAL SYMBOLS USED AS PWDR. powder ABBREVIATIONS: PLF pounds per lineal foot PSF pounds per square foot 1 St first PSI pounds per square inch 2nd second P.C.CONC. precast concrete 3rd third PREFAB. prefabricated 4th fourth PREFIN. prefinished 5th fifth 6th sixth 7th seventh Q.T. quarry tile 8th eighth RAU. radius / radiant REF. reference/refer to RFL. reflect (ed) (ive) (or) REFR. refrigerator REG. register REINF. reinforce (ed) R.C.P. reflected ceiling plan R.F.I. request for information R.F.P. request for proposal READ. required R.A. return air REV. revis (e) (ed) (ion) R.H. right hand (ed) NORTH -- EXISTING CONTOURS (EL. NOTED ON HIGH SIDE) NEW CONTOURS (EL. NOTED ON HIGH SIDE) +� TOPO SPOT V}}} ELEVATION - EXISTING X TOPO SPOT ELEVATION - NEW X ROOM NAME LIVING ROOM AND NUMBER 000 FLOOR PLAN SPOT ELEVATIONS T. 0. FINISH (BUILDING) EL. 100'-0" KEYNOTE ("XXX" - NOTE # / "A1.00" - SHT. W/ LEGEND) WINDOW TYPE IDENTIFICATION XX XX ("XX" - TYPE / "1" - SUB -TYPE") # MATERIAL INDICATIONS 1 Q � � D COLUMN ID WALL SECTION KEYING XX (a$$a - DWG. # / "A5.X" - SHT. #) A-3XX BUILDING SECTION KEYING XX ("A" - DWG. # / "4.XX" - SHT. #) XX \A-3XX) A-3XX DETAIL KEYING xx (a$$a - DWG. # / "6.XX" - SHT. #) A-5XX DOOR NUMBER xxx ("XXX" - RM. # / "A" - DR. ID.) A N INTERIOR ELEVATION KEYING xxx C'1" - EL. ID. / "A7.1" - SHT. #) W A-2XX E S 1 4 A-2XX 2 3 CONSTRUCTION TYPE (##) ("W-1" - TYPE / "##" - KEYNOTE) W-1 EARTHWORK: CARPENTRY: DISTURBED ROUGH FRAMING/ BLKG.-CONTINUOUS ��/��/��/��/��/� BLOCKING- UNDISTURBED - — DISCONTINUOUS STONE / GRAVEL DIMENSIONAL 2 4 POROUS FILL LUMBER PLYWOOD FINISH CARPENTRY MASONRY: FIREBRICK THERMAL PROTECTION: BRICK BATT / BLANKET LOOSE FILL STONE ;;, ;;, RIGID CONCRETE FIBER BOARDFF MASONRY UNIT CAST IN PLACE SPRAYED FOAM & PRE CAST A GROUT / MORTAR GLAZING: GLASS SAND CAULK and SEALANT: SEALANT W/ BACKER ROD M ETAL: JOINT FILLER ---------- ALUMINUM STEEL- PLASTER/BACKING BOARDS: LARGE SCALE SM. SCALE LG. SCALE LATH — — STEEL- O PLASTER SMALL SCALE GYPSUM WALL BOARD CEMENTITIOUS BACKER UNIT A. A LETTER OF AGREEMENT, DATED SEPTEMBER 29, H. THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES SHALL BE 2014, AS PREPARED BY THE ARCHITECT, ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN THERE IS NEED MADE A PART OF THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, AND OF INSPECTION AS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE CODE ARE ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT FOR OR BY ANY CODE OR ORDINANCE. REFERENCE DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS. B. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS CONSIST OF THE I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE AGREEMENT, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, ADDENDA, SAFETY AND CARE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND AND SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS AS ISSUED BY THE STATE O.S.H.A. REGULATIONS, AND FOR THE ARCHITECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL AND PROTECTION OF ALL WORK UNTIL IT IS DELIVERED SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT. COMPLETED TO THE OWNER. DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE COOPERATIVE AND CONTINUOUS. WORK INDICATED OR REASONABLY J. ALL DIMENSIONS NOTED TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER IMPLIED IN EITHER SHALL BE PROVIDED AS THOUGH SCALED DIMENSIONS. DIMENSIONS NOTED "N.T.S." FULLY COVERED BY BOTH. DENOTES NOT TO SCALE. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE CONTRACT FRAMING, U.N.O. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. K. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL OPENINGS THROUGH FLOORS, CEILINGS, AND WALLS C. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL WITH ALL ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, CODES AND ORDINANCES, AND SHALL BE PERFORMED PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL AND OTHER DISCIPLINE TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF CRAFTMANSHIP DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS WELL AS EXISTING BYJOURNEYMEN OF THE APPROPRIATE TRADES. CONDITIONS. D. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE INTENDED TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND L. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITEMS SERVICES REQUIRED TO COMPLETE ALL WORK REQUIRING COORDINATION AND RESOLUTION DURING DESCRIBED THEREIN. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BIDDING PROCESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THE CONTRACTOR TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR ANY CLARIFICATIONS. ARCHITECT ANY CONDITIONS WHICH WILL NOT PERMIT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT EXCLUDE FROM HIS BID, CONSTRUCTION ACCORDING TO THE INTENTIONS OF ANY ITEMS, AS NOTED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THESE DOCUMENTS. THE ARCHITECT SHALL PROVIDE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING DESIGN ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR'S CLARIFICATIONS SHALL INTENT WHERE ACCOMODATIONS FOR EXISTING NOT OMIT, CHANGE OR REDUCE THE QUALITY OF CONDITIONS OR WHERE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION IS CONSTRUCTION, AS INDICATED BY THE CONTRACT ABSENT FROM THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, IN DOCUMENTS. ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL CONDITIONS. M. VERIFY ALL SPACE DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN WITH E. ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTION OF SPECIFIED EXISTING JOB CONDITIONS BEFORE STARTING MATERIALS/PRODUCTS SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE CONSTRUCTION. ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW, IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN DIVISION ONE (1) OF THE N. WHERE WORK IS INSTALLED OR EXISTING FINISHES ARE PROJECT MANUAL AND THE GENERAL CONDITIONS. DISTURBED, SUCH AREAS SHALL BE REFINISHED TO SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED ONLY IF A MORE MATCH THE AREA PRIOR TO THE DISTURBANCE. ADVANTAGEOUS DELIVERY DATE OR LESSER COST, WITH CREDIT TO THE OWNER, ARE PROVIDED WITHOUT 0. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK AND VERIFY THE SACRFICING QUALITY, APPEARANCE, AND/OR CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WITH FIELD CONDITIONS, FUNCTION. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL THE CONFIRMING THAT ALL WORK IS BUILDABLE AS AS ARCHITECT BE REQUIRED TO PROVE THAT A PRODUCT SHOWN, PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. THE PROPOSED FOR SUBSTITUTION IS OR IS NOT EQUAL TO CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT THE QUALITY OF THE PRODUCT SPECIFIED. INITIATING A IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST, PRIOR TO REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION DOES NOT AUTHORIZE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, OR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, THE CONTRACTOR TO CHANGE THE SPECIFIED PRODUCT, THEREAFTER. UNTIL THE ARCHITECT HAS APPROVED THE SUBSTITUTION. P. EACH MISCELLANEOUS ITEM OF CUTTING, PATCHING, F. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS, CUT SHEETS AND SAMPLES OR FITTING IS NOT NECESSARILY INDIVIDUALLLY WHEN REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS, FOR REVIEW DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. NO BY THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF CUTTING, PATCHING, OR RELATED WORK. ALL WORK RELATED TO SUCH FITTING REQUIRED TO PROPERLY ACCOMODATE THE SAMPLES SHALL CONFORM WITH REVIEWED AND SCOPE OF WORK SHALL RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR ACCEPTED SAMPLES. WORK WHICH DOES NOT FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM SUCH WORK CONFORM SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT THE AS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SUB -CONTRACTORS SHALL SUBMIT ALL SUBMITTALS AND SAMPLES FOR REVIEW Q. ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INTENT OF THE THROUGH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ALL DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS ARE TO BE CLARIFIED SUBMITTALS AND SAMPLES SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN WITH THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS SUCH A MANNER, AS TO ALLOW ADEQUATE TIME FOR OR PROCEEDING WITH THE RELATED WORK. ALL REVIEW, AS NOTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, AND AS QUESTIONS SHALL BE IN THE FORM OF A REQUEST FOR NOT TO DELAY WORK IN PROGRESS. INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURES AS NOTED IN DIVISION ONE (1) OF THE PROJECT MANUAL. G. ALL WORK SHALL BE ERECTED PLUMB AND TRUE -TO - LINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST PRACTICES OF THE R. ALL ITEMS ARE NEW UNLESS CALLED OUT AS "EXISTING" TRADE, MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PARTICULAR PRODUCT, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. BUILDING/ZONING DATA Project Description: Floor Area Ratio ( FAR) calculation on 11 existing town home units Zoning Analysis: Zone District : SPA Allowable FAR: 2500 sf per unit ( 11 units = 27,500 sf total) Allowable Garage 500 sf per unit Allowable Deck Area 2500 x .15 = 375 sf per unit PUD Document: Reception # 340937 Date: 01-24-1992 Location: Book 667 Page: 731 Title: The Aspen Meadows Specially Planned Area (SPA) Development & Subdivision Agreement FAR SUMMATION: Unit # Allowable FAR Actual FAR 1 2,500.00 sf 2,942.50sf 2 2,500.00 sf 2,112.40 sf 3 2,500.00 sf 1,835.93 sf 4 2,500.00 sf 2,115.52 sf 5 2,500.00 sf 1,722.96 sf 6 2,500.00 sf 1,892.12 sf 7 2,500.00 sf 1,763.72 sf 8 2,500.00 sf 1,790.93 sf 9 2,500.00 sf 2,212.31 sf 10 2,500.00 sf 3,154.41 sf 11 2,500.00 sf 2,903.67 sf Totals 27,500.00 sf 24,446.47 sf OWNER: INDIVIDUAL OWNERS REPRESENTED BY ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES HOA UNITS 1-11 ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES CONTACT: JOHN SARPA CELL 370-2595 EMAIL: JOHN@JOHNSARPA.COM ARCHITECT: BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P. C. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81620 Telephone: 970 925 4755 Fax: 970 920 2950 Cell: 970 379 3806 Email: khowie@billposs.com Contact: KEITH HOWIE DRAWING INDEX G-001 GENERAL INFORMATION PUD PUD DOCUMENT FOR LOT 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY FROM ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS 1 - FAR1 UNIT 1 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 - FAR2 UNIT 1 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 - FAR3 UNIT 1 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 - FAR4 UNIT 1 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 - FAR5 UNIT 1 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 2 - FAR1 UNIT 2 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 2 - FAR2 UNIT 2 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 2 - FAR3 UNIT 2 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 3 - FAR1 UNIT 3 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 3 - FAR2 UNIT 3 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 3 - FAR3 UNIT 3 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 4 - FAR1 UNIT 4 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 4 - FAR2 UNIT 4 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 4 - FAR3 UNIT 4 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 5 - FAR1 UNIT 5 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 5 - FAR2 UNIT 5 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 5 - FAR3 UNIT 5 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 6 - FAR1 UNIT 6 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 6 - FAR2 UNIT 6 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 6 - FAR3 UNIT 6 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 6 - FAR4 UNIT 6 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 7 - FAR1 UNIT 7 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 7 - FAR2 UNIT 7 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 7 - FAR3 UNIT 7 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 8 - FAR1 UNIT 8 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 8 - FAR2 UNIT 8 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 8 - FAR3 UNIT 8 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 9 - FAR1 UNIT 9 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 9 - FAR2 UNIT 9 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 9 - FAR3 UNIT 9 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10 - FAR1 UNIT 10 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10 - FAR2 UNIT 10 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10 - FAR3 UNIT 10 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10 - FAR4 UNIT 10 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10 - FAR5 UNIT 10 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 - FAR1 UNIT 11 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 - FAR2 UNIT 11 - LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 - FAR3 UNIT 11 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 - FAR4 UNIT 11 - MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 - FAR5 UNIT 11 - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION LOCATION PLAN Star Mace Wh St. Renck § N+`� �,,• a ; 5""°°° Aspen Alpine Real Estate ASPEN/SNOWMASS Ranh Perry s... is R i r.. o.•. 0iiiiaa �'•+ F' N a r i vs�o�dir .. h � S M I'm a mn cw.w w i q,nM 4 R. w f Ed gap •.t{ aaana .b�R.YfY nrw dI �� + d .ru nw. � 'a 'rr" / •; . Ski free A rPen N101..°3 Ski�'- S PMs LaMa< '- R2 � rrav PROJECT LOCATION 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 01-13-16 SUMMATION CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION 11-111 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 PROJECT NO: DWG FILE: AMT - FAR - General Information Sheet.dwg SHEET TITLE GENERAL INFORMATION FAR SUMMATION G=001 © POSS AND ARCHECTE PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. 11340937 01/24/92 16:13 Rn 1-00.00 Pit 667 PG 73t Gllvia Davie, PIt1:in Cat) clerk, Dec a.,00 ATIIE ASPEN MEAD( SPECIALLY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION lIj40937 01/24/92 16:13 Rea 1406.00 DR 667 PG 750 Silvia Devi., Pi;LRan Cnty C16 one 4.00 Okla. Minimum RnIF Zoe District 01 space rxquttool have been waived by the City fartAt 5 in matter, al104 of the open space ollarvlso pmvidd in SPA developmem p1anJ i). External PAR(rwxhil l:] j) Internal FAR: no requirement k) Off -steal parking requirement: I space per tedroom 2, candomintomimilgo RodSi Minh Minimim.a Aro le nt pmmt to fridings made during the approval process and in Accordance with Smlan 24.7-1007 of the Munleipal Coda, (IV City has granted and Awarded comkminlumhmlon approval for all eleven d oils contemplated for Lot 5. Condominlumballo of the eight "In ng un4U is subject to payment of an affordable boning Impact fee According to Salton 24-7.1007A(1)(c). The He totals SM,240 and shall be paid in time of roam Ton of the Condominium plat and dmamlim for the units an Ld 5. The ilk monthminlmumiease robulremem for condor lnium units As remained at Salon 24-7.1007 (A OXIL)(l) of the Municipal Code has bean and Immby is waived AS to ell the condominium units on )-aL5 as approvd by this SPA pin. 3. Shal-provefnis11F1-pr yeff Lsits (a) 11111111 . All beltrAune, elmtdeand able liras on the Property servicing Ile improvements Sisals be undergrou AIM. All water and sanitary moor lines shall be designed and=$=led iij Domdanm with sum antsaf the City Rod of The ACSD and written easements will be provided trend as required continuing the as -built luzllali.of tsch easement. Out L7Rd na ImarovemwU. Savang, Ball abide by and subsunlaily conform to Iho trco removal and landwe pc plans rexordd as part of the Put in look A 2 at Page __.T, a see,, of the Itemds. The Iardmpo plans depict and desedbe the nature, extent and location of all plant materials In Appropdale realer to sated speciesand siloof existing plant material, flower and shrub bed defnlllg1 1 a pint mambd schedule with mmmo and bmaniml mount Sizes UAqumlItIcR proposed Tmlent of all ground mtfams (eg•, paving, lud, gm ravel, uncaring, etc.), decorative water falurte, retaining walls, fencingg, bamboo, and all other ogmed- uponlandscepefeatures. Such laduapingahall be wmpletd In a logical sequence mmmmsumo with The aaglnS, of Improvements as Contemplated In the I.ot 5 Construction Schedule, but in no event later than one year 24 11340937 011241- 16113 Raa $400.00 on 667 PO 786; G1l.v/a Davf., P1tnirL Cnty C1arL•, Dr. 4.00 1 ! .. requirements for fates and mutant above set finish. Any sudl substitution shalt be'subject to the prior approval orlhe Clry Attorney in his dcterminalion. 3. Tnlla The Final Plat depICU a trail casement across the Physics Property from Gillespie I a-r SUM to the race track trail on Car I. PHYSICS and the City agree that this trail easement is not to be paved,. Physics Is gronling this Civancnt but run no fsnanc(al obligation of any kind for Iho trall or my related work, � . �•' D. LOT 4 - CONSRINATION LAND: Lat 4 Is to bo mid by Savemh to the City of Aspen for the purpose cretin now. t.d 4�shell be zoned Wi(ltbit Presentation (YIP). It is the Intel of this zone district that _ Ills Property remain open with a trail system and appropdato bridge Connmllous (o the RIG Dwee Troll. Nehhec tin Consortium nor any of Its individual members them( Shall have my rcereasibillty whatsoever for the construction, Imallmlion or maintenance of any vast or Other mreatosml feditt" to be Imorporated Into Let 4. Exact toil locations muse be approved by UPS Planning Director giving priority to them alignments ppts which mintmim damage or dismpion to existing vegeUllon and lamboape and which (. Y subordinate grodo considcratlDna and, thus, minimize switchbacks, to preservatton of exhi ng Topography. i I. sit�mvemmil !� (e) 1WWtta. The final Pat slaws utility line easemwis AS existing and proposed for elgMncal, gas, storm and century sewer, and water. t(.';=,_l.(Yf'[j1BTR7ISTRB)tO1TcpC AT TNF'ASPRN A1PAjl(31Y<[e7 LIP Lot 5 is SaywAill Property and is zoned RMF according to and As shoym an the Plat. Existin8 d4VeloymglloLOk Scondsts oflhCsTghGlgUUp D<veILDPacd„rveofapproxtsdalety>il . If 7504qulfelttjt wmhttng of thin bedrooms and tw;o bates. lopmenl has been approved for an upando ad ramvallan of the exinin8 testes houses'rio cmtceight a { Ilirca•lie8raijn Rg114,Df �,Q1391m1e [eel ofFA$t 1atcNi In addlllon Thm n<w imslee houses shall be devclopd an Lei 5 ono on the South and of the exisling un)ls and two on Tha North end oftho existing unlU Path slew unit will tut l,500 sgwvc fat of FAR r with thin bedrooms Taal buildaut pn Lot Ssahall consist o(dcvcpunity with thirty-- 1 'i three bedroom attd(27300sg11iro fed ofF/(Rs exCludingcaryons (upto500 square (atz per_ a dsydilnt;iuniQ FAAs odd The defnlllos Ih4)wf tar the exislidg and now trusted Ihausey s(Dliyemalqusq forth and defit,<d in the Aspen land Um Ac'guadonslq Las Of.)am, 10 t991 notwLMiandjpg aind7hp11 nt),•Ivc for`notlas:I)1an the lgrayca{) 22 `F Ft : f; w{ u A ftx)A, 'i'l t�l ,f sd 1 s t11 7r , r kt' � by {'I(rF)S 1 A R'J5V ,f14tt:v1: �il 5tr tt ,j+,>3 4 �s fiyt frt a. It rti't�`II Jn��{'lll�fy�i.)'>:dtsfsl�e'4�K<��iF;ipY}t�l �r�. / 'y'1��;'utN.U.�s1,s'i.'F(�(Lj�.�11TtRi. a,Il sak ti..�S�i�a/"ra. vb[: f4S'oa'R'fi'4t�iiC`�1;`a^aid`1N�dkr.,,.,,}lila5''iS. 'ice /..r.. w.. n .. ..... r. .,. .._ ... ,. a.. .:. .. 1Aa 0340937 01/24/92 lba13 Rec $400.00 Die 667 PG'757 i .. Silvia Davie, P1tkin Cney Clark, Dr. R.09 1 after The date of issuance of the Cenifcaloof Occupancy for AID final i - phamaflsnpmvemcnts, It is the mutual understanding of the Parties that c CufRates of Occupancy may In fact Issue for impreyements even though G.!t the landscaping Improvements related thereto have not yet ban Compid- d, m long AS that portion of the finmlal guammy provided for in this ..� Agreement, which Covers the estimated cost of such unOnUhcd landsap- Ing remains available To the City purl Ten to the terms of this Agreement All lrm replacement shag be on a onOto-onealiper inch basis throughout I the Project as a whole with minimum slut at t IIII caliper. I!' : The Plat depicu all trails dtficated or eanveyd m to public use and all caseents (�. linking off-slet trails to the Projaement t's trail system, including (Ito Emit cas between that Tennis tomb.= and mlaurom. Write n casements shall be a cacatd and co A<ydnOfthafter ilmnnmclionmortheeMAEfom Mh laalionof ad 1 . ( ED Lot emrns, A pot 5, of de icte on T ens fiat the lrall from Malnsys Road y Eo Lot 4 croaua Lot other as unp t on la Plat. ciliti constructionancaon ants Y • 1 Easement and any deer appunrnant the City yof facilities and rSavana and the Careingtslee Ruderesponsibilitymnsibmclafies Cityafty for y ofthiS orkor nor the Cansarnmext of my ymign Onandal responsibility for any of this work or for the mainlrnanm o[any aummU, pv P(auncis; sfa10fG5(aLGiBLisi'1i141Glptnf:ItliseLl� I -sslir t In order to saure the conslmctlDn of the site and andsapc Improvements In f ! famgrapes 3(a) and (b) above ad to gm ;. 100% of the asslmatd cost of I' -,' such imprevemanu, Savanal, shall gaamntm by iacvaable hard, sight draft or 1 lesser of mmmllment orc edit from o facially responsible leader That funds in the amount of such estimated mnb, are held by it for the account of City for the constmedo and Installation of the above-demribed improvements. As a ' Codition for Ignore of-Sliuilding Permit far a portion or all of lire renovinkin and new construction anticipated herein. Somali and City shall ages on that Thedgs of the work oulind in Paragraphs 3(a) anut 3(b) above reasonably necessary to complete the wuA for which a permit is being Bought and the :I ry P pa ¢ 8 .,� l annually of the upon Grp rmi asmmnm shall abe men delivered vomit the City prior to Usuanm N the building gift the All he uncon aUuta rig t$ upon by d foIIDSeveral' to _ Cfly,inall events, shall glue the Cily lheunro1Wl11onatfight, upon and following I default by Savanah,notice thereof by the City, and a forty day tight them0cr to cure, to withdraw funds as necessary and upon demand to partially or fully . I - complete and/or pay for any of such improvcirl or pry shy uncontested oulslandinA bills for work dew Ihcreo by any party, with any excess gum A my amount (o be applied firstrol udditionol asks nistrulve or legal costs associmd j with my such default end the repair of any deterioration in Improvements already 25 ,,i• r � y rk vS uv td1a�7 f )/I'ry M1 �j/�1 i III rF{ st g / A, �• � r� se I \.1 t C ti Lryg'1f Sit ; tx��y�} Ayr e' I i '% i k5s `von 41`�, '�5$5.} e'` t (7', % ) t', '7trt I. �.... /1 '+SYV)tN,y�A4`DA••. �(� I t )��31 (x rJ r*(: �s Sa t;(9!Gi 11@40937 01/24/92 16113 Roe *400.00 DI: 667 PG. 737 A. ai ',. Gilviu Day i._Vi Lldp Cnty Clare, or, IT." c.'-i ,'pedadnexl suftemlitg fpne tOs l9)l�any,3u6'scquemly.dopled reduction initial ,4o.lhe defnttidn nr:411CU DICA of FAHSq no grow new re8dence, have received an 1 alloIntent under the GMQS and have ieaetved variations form@asks, height aped Upon 1.. space, AS noted on the Plat and AS dounfli d below. 711e following dimensional requlmmenU ore for the RMF Zone .Dlldd) a varladons in these requirements That have been granted for the development i•' activity comeriplated for 1.15 are noted: Dirt r` a) Minimum lot St.(sq, A,); 6000 b) MWmues lot am por dwelling unit: :li - )) 3bedroom unit. 3,630sq. ft. e) Minimum lot width: MORE .. d) Minimum front yard; 1) Pdnclpal building: 10 HOUR Ill Accessory tiallding: 15 feet ! 1 NO. A variation from minimum RMF Zone Dindd front yeti wbwks for amnmry buildings has been granted by the City to r zero fed for Lot 5.) [if <) Minimum side )yd: 5 fact r >) Minimum ear yard: t 6. I).. PrirldWl building: 10 feet 1` (" II) Aanlmry building: IS feet f V' -. Afasdmum _helgry!:) (25.RULE T ' r t- aEQ1c. A dimensional height variation for The two nonhemmost trustee boom has been granted by the City for up to eight feel.) IT) Percent ofopw s g '1 r Wee rcguird for building silo; 35% 23 :;'P/ � L Frni 11. tS 1 D ; ...:g: PR` .� xt el �i R -r5lai 'rI so7r J9 p. 19l 13409lute 37 Dnv01/24/92 16113 Arc ♦400.00 DEC 667 PG 760 ¢, Pi Lhin Cnty Cl orb. OPC e'.b0 Constructed IsafoPo the unused remainder Hf any) of such guammy is rcicamd to Savanah. As portions of The rlquhcd improvements are completed, the Public Works Dlmrorshall Inspect Them, and upon approval and written acceptance, he shall authorize the release from the guaranty delivered by Somali of the agreed es Ir dcostfor that portion of Iho Improvements except unit 10%of the Actual C0gOf IheSlle orlandeape haPmvemenls shall bemtalned until all proposed silo or landscape improvements am orlpfeed and approved by Ilse Public works Director. At anythro and from inytio little, Savanah shall have the right to substitute for the form of financial arcum o, given, m long M such mbslltuling farm meets the rcqulmmenU for form and content above set forlh, Any such substitution stall be subject to the priorapproval afCl Allo 1 Pme In his Jetcrmi Y Y Im11Dn, 6. FmpinY Ng rifts ib manah and the City ackslowldgc lhdt the refmyalson and capsnshm ofibo eight, tUulw house do M efalaany empt0yee Impact beaiye Rye baflrbom'ofipafy(V each uhil.remalnf:at 3.4 Say -Seth shall pay (o the City an affordable housing mlugallon Impact fee for 1.66low Income employees per unit for each of she thin new residential unit, on Lot 5, in an amol,nt to be calculated phrmmn to those fin guldellnal in offal at the lima rho Jim Is to be paid. 77ta fee shalt be paid prior to the Issuance of the building pcmlt far Comwdan of any new midenlial unit an Lot 5 and shall be paid in proportion to [be number of units wught to be pencilled. Lot 61s owned by Somali and Is zoned RMF according To and as Shawn an the Plat, Currently them is no.midenual development on Lot 6. Approved under this plan is development of gven townhomo units of three bedrooms and 2,500 None Pact of FAR exh. Total buildout 01016 shall consist ofmven units will, Rmulyonebdrooms and 17;500 square fed of PAR, excluding arpans (up to 500 square rat per dwelling unit). FARs and the derinitions Hereafter The existing and new Arr m houses shall remain as set forth and defined in Ow Aspen land Use Regulation in offset as efluno 10, 19911 June 19, 1991, ALLY STUIT survive for not less Than the three yearg etld next mcalon or June 19, 1of any sWicquendy ew (ow redudlo in or change To the allotment n der he Cite 0MQSfFARs. TlTosevcn new townforahave «men Spam and stacks the City CMQS and have nnoted vthe Fia far result open space and setbacks for accessary buildings, all m noted o the Pat otl dacrib.vl herein. 26 Ll e' E o�' .� n, I °i zARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 605 EASt HAIR STREET ASPEII, COIORADO 81611 ITT 970 / 925 4755 IT) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue; 07.15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION 11- 111 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 OYIG FILE: AMT- FAR, PUD.dwg SHEETTITLE PUD DOCUMENT PUD © 2015 °a`�lil°i[1ue[ovwaslo, P.c. DIE u1m AMI Nm DrnaU WALL MUOUQD Dn uuseDCuvsM Isn1E PRCPfR1YDf Am PoSSNiDISSCLUfFS.IAGImCNAENNfUNma,p C. IIDPIafOgI1151NLPossnn ncem FDYALIp1EIDEPPIOAIIA(rmi PfANISSIDImi LM1l PO55Nm AS3DCIA1f5,AAG0ECNXNmXNfl'IIG,P[. aAlPDDen AyS0CUtES.lAC11AE[NREA49 %MiaN,pr PW1RfIW1 Nf M,Ma 'EMD.RIUICAYM90Nmfif5mYFe RIp115, 4'IGUDINC LCPIaIGILNFAflO. n z a Z UNPAVED ROAD m O d 9�\ OZ m s N = 2 }}•. =Z WO oy-vz 3SyPgpp z z DPq y < �• N0 �� m Q E W w m �aa z �gy4T Ld o Z G7 a t€ }o \\J \ O Q C O o�44t%YY o < W 3 P e \ N \ 10e0359.E 559.95 m 0 0 \ \ o a a gZ' 8 M; 6t,,K020 N / '\ s /� / \ \ \ / N 9 / 4 / Ckz o 4i m / • / 5swo 96 iq w P' ;{��-•1,300SIva 831bM / ,w 6� 4j // . j • // 'o e°/ / s'� \ I' v 1/v L, � \ \ i.� / L'1 Li• J {�/,ls,� \ \ � � •� • "" • 3.,80, 8tbH6p N N . ,90'6L M.,6Z,b0�•t'0 N sysy 'O?.Z.. ��Ae� I I / �' /® // ti�im • 9. r m `e9 \ ./ r f n<Sa f" ` _ _ __ �•�.� — �. — — — — .� .� — — J / �� "'�" /90 j0 / /' y o �! `S = N 81 �,--------------� _395g z s li o \ �_ Q"':•SS-9y IA. ZO�C t e�j S 1N3Y(3S13 01&3313 O t 0 3 £Z,OSml0 5 ,ZS'St- 2.4]� S o Zm m r ,82'6 .IL'L£ .69'6£ -�' • 5 W 6 2 w Cl a 2 N N z o D .<., lb CY) c+ �103p rx �^ rom�� m Apry DO O O y z sn ° :D � 5 h Zm D a ti 6 my Q w GJ U0,se®ol s SO SSS � a M 9 Zm 'm w F a F a 1 m 3091,900£0 S zt y��yy� g .1 F a ro z J 2 / .4 W CJ / / M„bS,L0000 Ss / L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N 40 / 60 RB 2 IS O N ,yy0ry6pp•� d 5296 N za / w 0h / CD / a o U O E OU<OUmU� wQQKZp / Oouw�s�3 w I��-z O zOJz 0 �- o w W>_Op> p, IZZ>ZUVI Oc O z IOJOp� W 2 IUOQ�WNW IO, w I Ioci''3oo� hZ WpOp(JWW IJ motto K��Owes- Ia o=w 0z<u WO�OKw WO I ip N�ZwoSUKw I j3 O MDCQz Q ZO" I IT ZN wwt-w0= 'OW UWL°1�>I U IE Z W r �mouw4✓=i3 a I� T.O. PWD. - UPPER E L. 112'-0" � T.0-Co O. CON - GARAGE E L. 103'-0" N 00 0 0 N 0 V) 0 M Ln CD 0 CV .olE °a CD U o OJ N C L N O E � �C R C O ILL. a UIVG110% WALL C LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. -NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" FAR Key Counting FAR VV/'1LL J II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II L II II II II II II II II II II II II II J LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" WALL i LLJ. WALL H EXPOSED.00s WALL --'WALL OF EXISTING GRADE WALL H AREA 1 F WALL H - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL H - TOTAL WALL AREA = 129.00 sf WALL F - EXPOSED WALL - AREA = 202.82 sf WALL F - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL F - TOTAL WALL AREA = 202.82 sf _ T.O. PWD. - #10 - UPPER EL.112'-0" AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM _ T.O. PWD. - #10 - DINING EL.100'-0" -------- T.O. PWD. - #10 - LIVING EL. 99'-0" WALL D LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 0.00 40.00 WALL B 0.00 38.65 WALL C 16.73 70.83 WALL D 26.11 34.82 WALL E 147.43 185.33 WALL F 202.82 202.82 WALL G 42.88 42.88 WALL H 129.00 129.00 WALL i 205.15 237.87 WALL J 0.00 367.92 TOTALS 770.12 1350.12 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 770.12 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1350.12 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 770.12 sf / 1350.12 sf = .560 X 100 = 57 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1272.00 sf 1272.00 sf X .570 = 725.04 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale WALL D - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 26.11 sf WALL D - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 8.71 sf WALL D - TOTAL WALL AREA = 34.82 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE _ T.O. PWD. #10 -LOWER EL. 89'-U FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1234.35 sf LOWER LEVEL 725.04 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 168.11 sf TOTAL 2942.50 sf 2942.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 442.50 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (128.00 sf + 176.00 sf) 304.00 sf Total Deck Area 543.11 sf 543.11 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 168.11 sf = 168.11 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 1 11 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 1_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 1 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 -FAR 1 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. PWD. - DINING / ENTRY_ 100'-0" PWD. - LIVING 99.-0.. PWD. - LOWER B9'-O" N 00 0 Ln 0 N 0 V) 0 M Ln CD CV .olE °a CD U o OJ N C L N O �E � C R C O LL a WALL D WALL C FAR Key Counting FAR V Vr"LL J II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II IL II II II II II II II II II II II II II J 1 L J LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" WALL i J T.O. PWD. - UPPER Y EL.112'-0" G GRADE LINE OF EXISTING GRADE E T.O. CONC. - GARAGE _ E L. 103'-0" -N T.O. PWD. - ENTRY _ EL. 100'-0" WALL B - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL B - SUB -GRADE WAL AREA = 38.65 sf WALL B - TOTAL WALL AREA = 38.65 sf T.O. PWD. - LOWER _ EL. 89'-0" WALL B WALL J AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM 3ED WALL RADE WALL cf WALL Sf LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 0.00 40.00 WALL B 0.00 38.65 WALL C 16.73 70.83 WALL D 26.11 34.82 WALL E 147.43 185.33 WALL F 202.82 202.82 WALL G 42.88 42.88 WALL H 129.00 129.00 WALL i 205.15 237.87 WALL J 0.00 367.92 TOTALS 770.12 1350.12 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 770.12 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1350.12 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 770.12 sf / 1350.12 sf = .560 X 100 = 57 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1272.00 sf 1272.00 sf X .570 = 725.04 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1234.35 sf LOWER LEVEL 725.04 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 168.11 sf TOTAL 2942.50 sf 2942.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 442.50 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (128.00 sf + 176.00 sf) 304.00 sf Total Deck Area 543.11 sf 543.11 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 168.11 sf = 168.11 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24-15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 1 11 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 1_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 1 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 -FAR 2 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. T.O. PWD. - DININ( EL. 10M- T.O. PWD. - LIVING EL. 99'-0" T.O. PWD. - LOWEF EL. 89'-0" N 00 0 Ln 0 N 0 V) C3 CQ Ln CD CV .olE cc CD °O N Ln U o OJ N C L N O �E � C R CD O LL d Main L, = 239.' Main L, = 1241 WALL K ►UT%1IIII•�/ WALL U WALL T WALL S 4 3/16"=1'-0" ,n MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" WALL O 'PER T�PPER E L. 112'-0" AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM 'PER LEVEL TEM (POSED WALL 59 sf WALL T - EXPOSED WALL JB-GRADE WALL AREA = 37.33 sf )TAL WALL WALL T - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 12.88 sf .59 sf WALL T - TOTAL WALL AREA = 50.20 sf GARAGE T.O. CONC. - GARAGE EL. 103'-0" STING GRADE JTCHEN LINE OF EXISTING GRADE JTRY T�NTRY 1 a � WALL P - EXPOSED WALL - - - - _ - - _ - - - _ _ - -F EL. 100% AREA = 172.33 sf WALL R - EXPOSED WALL WALL P- SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 158.47 sf AREA = 0 sf WALL R- SUB -GRADE WALL WALL P - TOTAL WALL AREA = 28.53 sf AREA = 172.33 sf WALL R - TOTAL WALL AREA = 187.00 sf T89OWER EL. '-0" WALL T WALL R WALL P MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL K 304.87 304.87 WALL L 254.62 254.62 WALL M 68.73 68.73 WALL N 159.86 159.86 WALL 0 469.19 469.19 WALL P 172.33 172.33 WALL Q 181.59 181.59 WALL R 158.47 187.00 WALL S 52.91 52.91 WALL T 37.33 50.20 WALL U 148.76 148.76 WALL V 49.55 49.55 TOTALS 2058.21 2069.61 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 2058.21 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 2069.61 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 2058.21 sf / 2069.61 sf = .994 X 100 = 99.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1241.80 sf 1241.80 sf X .99 = 1234.35 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1234.35 sf LOWER LEVEL 725.04 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 168.11 sf TOTAL 2942.50 sf 2942.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 442.50 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (128.00 sf + 176.00 sf) 304.00 sf Total Deck Area 543.11 sf 543.11 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 168.11 sf = 168.11 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 1 11 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 1_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 1 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 -FAR 3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. AREA OF UPP FLOOR SYSTE T.O. PWD. - UPPER EL. 112'-0" WALL O - EXP AREA = 469.1 £ WALL O - SUB AREA = 0 sf WALL O - TOT, AREA = 469.1', T.O. CONC.-GARAGE EL. 103'-0" N 00 0 0 N z Q CD W Cz Main L, = 239.' Main L, = 1241 WALL V 1►��G1��FiJ WALL T WALL S MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" WALL O PWD. - UPPER 12'-0" PWD. - ENTRY 00.-0.. PWD. - LIVING ,9.-0.. PWD. - LOWER 19'-0" OF EXISTING ,DE AREA OF UPPER FLOOR SYSTEM WALL N - EXPOS AREA = 159.86 sf WALL N - SUB-Gf AREA = 0 sf WALL N - TOTAL AREA = 159.86 s WALL N WALL L WALL V MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL K 304.87 304.87 WALL L 254.62 254.62 WALL M 68.73 68.73 WALL N 159.86 159.86 WALL 0 469.19 469.19 WALL P 172.33 172.33 WALL Q 181.59 181.59 WALL R 158.47 187.00 WALL S 52.91 52.91 WALL T 37.33 50.20 WALL U 148.76 148.76 WALL V 49.55 49.55 TOTALS 2058.21 2069.61 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 2058.21 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 2069.61 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 2058.21 sf / 2069.61 sf = .994 X 100 = 99.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1241.80 sf 1241.80 sf X .99 = 1234.35 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale T.O. PWD. - #10 - UPPER EL. 112'-0" WALL V - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 49.55 sf WALL V - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL V - TOTAL WALL AREA = 49.55 sf T.O. PWD. - #10 - DINING EL. 100'-01, T.O. PWD. - #10 - LIVING EL. 99.-0.. LINE OF EXISTING GRADE J L. 89 PWD. #10 - LOWER '-01,1, FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1234.35 sf LOWER LEVEL 725.04 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 168.11 sf TOTAL 2942.50 sf 2942.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 442.50 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (128.00 sf + 176.00 sf) 304.00 sf Total Deck Area 543.11 sf 543.11 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 168.11 sf = 168.11 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 1 11 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 1_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 1 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 -FAR 4 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. N 00 0 0 N 0 V) 0 M Ln CD CV .olE cc CD °O N Ln U o OJ N C L N N o � E � C CD —o LL. a UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1234.35 sf LOWER LEVEL 725.04 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 168.11 sf TOTAL 2942.50 sf 2942.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 442.50 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (128.00 sf + 176.00 sf) 304.00 sf Total Deck Area 543.11 sf 543.11 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 168.11 sf = 168.11 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 1 11 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 1_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 1 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 1 -FAR 5 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL E - EXPOSED AREA = 0 sf WALL E - SUB-GRADI WALL AREA = 7.74 s' WALL E - TOTAL WAL AREA = 7.74 sf N 00 0 0 N N F- WALL CALCS. -LOWER LEVEL -NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL E WALL C WALL CALCS. - LOWER LEVEL - EAST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" Unit 3 Up ---� I � r I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L DN Dn LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL Y EL.92'-2" wer Level Floorplate 386.17 sf ALL C FAR Key T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE Counting FAR AREA = 23.06 sf WALL G - TOTAL WALL AREA = 37.59 sf AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1" WALL A - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 62.32 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" WALLA - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 57.97 sf T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" WALLA -TOTAL WALL AREA = 120.29 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE WALL CALCS. - LOWER LEVEL - WEST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL CALCS. 3/16"=1'-0" WALL D - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 sf -WALL D - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 24.20 sf WALL D - TOTAL WALL AREA = 24.20 sf T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL 104'-6" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" - LOWER LEVEL - SOUTH ELEVATION WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 62.32 120.29 WALL B 59.19 114.25 WALL C 0 110.50 WALL D 0 24.20 WALL E 0 7.74 WALL F 0.69 51.60 WALL G 14.52 37.59 TOTALS 136.72 466.17 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 136.72 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 466.17 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 136.72 sf / 466.17 sf = .299 X 100 = 29.3 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 386.17 sf 386.17 sf X 29.3% = 113.15 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1367.21 sf LOWER LEVEL 113.15 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 54.31 sf. TOTAL 2112.14 sf 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2112.14 sf existing FAR = 387.87 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 308.80 sf Available Garage FAR 191.20 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 366.37 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 429.31 sf 441.49 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 54.31 sf 54.31 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 8 16 11 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 2 21 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 2_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 2 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 2 -FAR 1 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. AREA OF UPPER L FLOOR SYSTEM WALL i - EXPOSED AREA = 367.50 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE WALL i - SUB-GRA[ AREA = 103.55 sf WALL i - TOTAL WA = 480.25 sf N 00 0 0 N N 0 v) C3 Cz CD Ln CV .oIE cc CD °O N Ln U o OJ N C L N N O E � C CD -o i_ a Main = 15< WALL WALL S Deck Area 366.37 sf WALL CALCS. - MAIN LEVEL - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" MAIN LEVEL ROOF SYSTEM WALL N - EXPOSE[ AREA = 96.35 sf WALL N - SUB-GRA AREA = 0 sf WALL N - TOTAL W AREA = 96.35 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE WALL N WALL L WALL J WALL CALCS. - MAIN LEVEL - EAST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL E L. 104'-6" T.O. CEILING -LOWER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2' LINE OF EXISTING GRADE AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM 0.1UPPER LEVELTE 04'-6" T.O. CEILING - LOWER LEVEL E WALL J - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 107.85 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-Ol. T.O.BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1' WALL J - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 62.94 sf J T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL.95'-6' WALL J - TOTAL WALL AREA = 170.79 sf T.O.L 9C IN CON EICRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL FAR Key WALL H - EXPOSE[ AREA = 305.02 sf WALL H - SUB-GRA AREA 0 sf WALL H - TOTAL W AREA = 305.02 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE AREA OF SOLARIUM ROOF SYSTEM WALLS -EXPOSED WALL AREA = 144.07 sf WALL S - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL S - TOTAL WALL AREA = 144.07 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1" WALL Q -EXPOSED WALL AREA = 5.67 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" WALL Q - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL Q - TOTAL WALL AREA = 5.67 sf T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2' LINE OF EXISTING GRADE WALL H WALL S WALL Q WALL CALCS. - MAIN LEVEL - WEST ELEVATION 5 3/16"=1'-0" WALL O -EXPOSED WALL ..._-------------- AREA = 67.81 sf - -_ WALL O - SUB -GRADE WALL WALL K -EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL M - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 82.63 sf WALL O = TOTAL WALL AREA = 27.33 sf WALL K - SUB -GRADE AREA = 67.81 sf WALL M - SUB -GRADE WALL WALL AREA = 0 sf AREA = 0 sf WALL K - TOTAL WALL AREA = 82.63 sf WALL M = TOTAL WALL AREA = 27.33 sf WALL P - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 56.53 sf WALL P - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA OF GARAGE ROOF AREA OF SOLARIUM ROOF AREA = 0 sf a SYSTEM SYSTEM WALL P = TOTAL WALL AREA = 56.53 sf T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL 104'-6" WALL R - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 108.76 sf WALL R - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL R = TOTAL WALL T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL AREA = 108.76 sf _ EL 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1' LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL L- - T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2' WALL R WALL P WALL O WALL M WALL K WALL CALCS. - MAIN LEVEL - SOUTH ELEVATION 4 3/16"=1'-0" Counting FAR Deck Area Carport Area (Garage) Storage area WALL J HALL K NALL L NALL M NALL N ;arport Area 308.80 sf >torage 1.79 sf -his area is exempt up to 32 f per City of Aspen code ect. 26.575.020 D. 11 WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (so TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL H 305.02 305.02 WALL i 367.50 480.25 WALL J 107.85 170.79 WALL K 82.63 82.63 WALL L 57.51 57.51 WALL M 27.33 27.33 WALL N 96.35 96.35 WALL 0 67.81 67.81 WALL P 56.53 56.53 WALL Q 5.67 5.67 WALL R 108.76 108.76 WALL S 144.07 144.07 TOTALS 1426.76 1602.72 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1426.76 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1602.72 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 1453.84 sf / 1628.69 sf = .890 X 100 = 89.0 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1536.19 sf 1536.19 sf X 89.0% = 1367.21 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1367.21 sf LOWER LEVEL 113.15 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 54.31 sf. TOTAL 2112.14 sf 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2112.14 sf existing FAR = 387.87 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 308.80 sf Available Garage FAR 191.20 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 366.37 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 429.31 sf 441.49 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 54.31 sf 54.31 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08,24-15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 2 21 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 2_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 2 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION FAR 2 OO 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. N 00 0 Ln 0 N N F— 0 LL V) 0 M Ln CD CV .olE cc CD °O N Ln U o OJ N C L N O E � �C R C O LL. d UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" Counting FAR FAR CALCULATION Deck Area Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Area )4 sf Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1367.21 sf LOWER LEVEL 113.15 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 54.31 sf. TOTAL 2112.14 sf 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2112.14 sf existing FAR = 387.87 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 308.80 sf Available Garage FAR 191.20 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 366.37 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 429.31 sf 441.49 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 54.31 sf 54.31 sf Counting towards FAR WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 2 21 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 2_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 2 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION FAR 3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. AREA OF MAIN LEVE FLOOR SYSTEM WALL C - EXPOSED AREA = 0 sf WALL C - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 131.6E TOTAL WALL AREA = 131.68 sf CV ­4 00 O O CV M z a) a) Ca 0 V) 0 cc a N Lfi M � W :n Ln U o Q) N CD L'J L N N / J O E cc C a.) = WALL C 11� LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL Y EL.92'-2" Counting FAR 3 F.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM F.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" F.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1' EXPOSED WALL AREA = 68.22 sf F.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 63.46 sf F.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" TOTAL WALL AREA = 130.54 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE WALL A LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" LUWEK LEVEL WALL CALLS. - SUU I H ELEVA I MIN 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 68.22 130.54 WALL B 19.66 37.96 WALL C 0 131.68 WALL D 18.15 1 37.96 TOTALS 106.03 338.14 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 106.03 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 338.14 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 106.03 sf / 338.14 sf = .314 X 100 = 31.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 136.39 sf 136.39 sf X .314 = 42.83 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1008.71 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.83 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 206.92 sf TOTAL 1835.93 sf 2500 sf available FAR - 1835.93 sf existing FAR = 664.07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 461.82 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 512.95 sf Upper Level Deck Area 68.97 sf Total Deck Area 581.92 sf 581.92 sf (Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 206.92 sf 206.92 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: HPC 12-10-14 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24-15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 3 31 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 3_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 3 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 3 -FAR 1 2015 AILL POSS AIATES RCHITEC URDE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. U_a UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL F - EXPOSED Wi AREA = 420.07 sf WALL F - SUB -GRADE AREA = 44.07 sf WALL F - TOTAL WALL AREA = 464.14 sf MAIN LEVEL ROOF SYSTEM WALL i - EXPOSED N AREA = 140.13 sf WALL i - SUB -GRADE AREA = 0 sf WALL i - TOTAL WALL AREA = 140.13 sf CV 00 0 0 CV M F- WALL E Main Li =1 WALL L Deck A 512.9E Plantei 32 sf This pl< per City 26.575 MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" L----------------� - - - - - WALL i WALL G T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. CEILING @ LOWER LEVEL EL. 103'-7" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2' T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" WALL G - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 120.58 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE WALL G - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 53.52 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6' WALL G - TOTAL WALL AREA = 174.10 sf _ J T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL.92'-2' MAIN LEVEL LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" Unit 4 a WALL E - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 282.83 sf WALL E - SUB -GRADE WA AREA 0 sf WALL E - TOTAL WALL AREA = 282.83 sf Counting FAR Deck Area Carport Area (Garage) Planter (Exempt) GARAGE ROOF SYSTEM T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" WALL K -EXPOSED WALL AREA = 140.13 sf WALL K - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" TOTAL WALL AREA = 140.13 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE WALL K MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL H - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 97.37 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE WALL H - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 73.42 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" WALL H - TOTAL WALL AREA = 170.79 sf T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2' 3 IVIAI IV LLVLL WALL UALI.J. - �oUU I H LLLVA I IUIN 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL E 282.83 282.83 WALL F 420.07 464.14 WALL G 120.58 174.10 WALL H 97.37 170.79 WALL i 140.13 140.13 WALL J 46.75 46.75 WALL K 140.13 140.13 WALL L 257.04 257.04 TOTALS 1504.93 1675.91 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1504.93 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1675.91 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 1504.93 sf / 1675.91 sf = .898 X 100 = 89.8 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1123.28 sf 1123.28 X .898 = 1008.71 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1008.71 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.83 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 206.92 sf TOTAL 1835.93 sf 2500 sf available FAR - 1835.93 sf existing FAR = 664.07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 461.82 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 512.95 sf Upper Level Deck Area 68.97 sf Total Deck Area 581.92 sf 581.92 sf (Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 206.92 sf 206.92 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 06-17-15 FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 3 31 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 3_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 3 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION FAR 2 OO 2015 BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION No Scale N 00 O Ln O N M F— 0 V) 0 M Ln CD O CV .olE cc CD °O N Ln U o OJ N C L N O �E � C R C O LL d Unit 4 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" Counting FAR Deck Area WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Area Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade 17 sf and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1008.71 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.83 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 206.92 sf TOTAL 1835.93 sf 2500 sf available FAR - 1835.93 sf existing FAR = 664.07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 461.82 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 512.95 sf Upper Level Deck Area 68.97 sf Total Deck Area 581.92 sf 581.92 sf (Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 206.92 sf 206.92 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: SD 10-09-14 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24,15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 3 31 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 3_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 3 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION FAR 3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. N 00 0 0 N NTI :1 LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL A LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" Unexcavated Crawlspace 43' x 20'-10" _ T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E T BASEMENT LEVEL E L. 100'-0" _ TO. PWD. LOWER LEVEL E.L. 95'-6' T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92-2" N LEVEL CTURE N LEVEL ;EMENT LEVEL DSED WALL sf =R LEVEL 3-GRADE 60.19 sf BASEMENT LEVEL WALL A - TOTAL WALL AREA = 124.90 sf ower Level Floorplate 318.91 sf 'ALL C FAR Key Counting FAR MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL C - EXPOSED AREA = 0 sf WALL C - SUB -GRAD[ WALL AREA = 122.81 TOTAL WALL AREA = 122.81 sf WALL C T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL E L. 104'-6" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL.99 P J T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL.95'-6' T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" LOWER LEVEL WALL CALS. - EAST ELEVATION 3/1 6"= 1'-0" AREA = 37.59 sf ^__ WALL E WALL D R LEVEL LEVEL SEMENT LEVEL LEVEL P BASEMENT LEVEL LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 64.71 124.90 WALL B 44.73 89.46 WALL C 0 122.81 WALL D 8.69 57.06 WALL E 17.91 37.59 TOTALS 136.04 431.82 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 136.04 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 431.82 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 136.04 sf / 431.82 sf = .315 X 100 = 31.5 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 316.02 sf 316.02 sf X 31.5% = 99.55 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1372.01 sf LOWER LEVEL 99.55 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 66.49 sf. TOTAL 2115.52 sf 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2115.52 sf existing FAR = 384.48 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 340.05 sf Available Garage FAR 159.95 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 378.55 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 441.49 sf 441.49 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 66.49 sf 66.49 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 4 41 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 4_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 4 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 4 -FAR 1 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION No Scale THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. AREA OF UPPER LI FLOOR SYSTEM WALL G - EXPOSE[ AREA = 396.26 sf WALL G - SUB-GRA AREA = 76.10 sf WALL G - TOTAL W AREA = 472.37 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE WALL F - EXPOSE[ AREA = 305.02 sf WALL F - SUB-GRA AREA 0 sf WALL F - TOTAL W, AREA = 305.02 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL F WALL Q WALL O MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" _ T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E T BASEMENT LEVEL E L. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL E T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LE EL 92'-2' T.O. CEILING - GARAGE EL. 105'-3" AREA OF SOLARIUM ROOF SYSTEM T.O. ROOF - GARAGE EL. 105'-3" T.O. CEILING - SOLARIUM EL. 103'-6" WALL Q -EXPOSED WALL AREA = 141.75 sf WALL Q - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" WALL Q - TOTAL WALL AREA = 141.75 sf WALL O -EXPOSED WALL AREA = 5.67 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" WALL O - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL O - TOTAL WALL AREA = 5.67 sf T.O. CONCRETE Q BASEMENT LE) EL. 92'-2" 7 MAIN LEVEL ROOF SYSTEM WALLL- EXPOSE[ AREA = 117.04 sf WALL L - SUB-GRAI AREA = 0 sf WALL L - TOTAL Wi AREA = 117.04 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE AREA OF SOLARIUM ROOF SYSTEM WALL P - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 123.26 sf WALL P - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL P = TOTAL WALL AREA = 123.26 sf AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM J, T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL Y EL.104'-6" WALL H - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 115.48 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E WALL H - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 62.64 sf WALL H - TOTAL WALL AREA = 178.12 sf h T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. I I I I I I I I I L 1 - _ _ TY 0.CONCRETE@ BASEMENT LEVEL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL M - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 67.81 sf WALL M - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL M = TOTAL WALL AREA = 67.81 sf i WALL N - EXPOSED WALL - AREA = 54.56 sf WALL N - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL N = TOTAL WALL AREA = 54.56 sf WALL H aLJ ° L a° < a Q a 4 ° ° Q a ° G ° a a ° 4' a ° I I I I Z_L -L - �- WALLi- EXPOSED WALL AREA = 151.35 sf WALL i - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL i - TOTAL WALL AREA = 151.35 sf AREA OF GARAGE ROOF SYSTEM }� T.O. UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6PWD. "- h T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. Ol 0 00 } T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL.99'-1" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE TYPWD. LOWER LEVEL EL.. 95'-6" h T.O. CONCRETE Q BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (s.f.) TOTAL WALL AREA (s.f.) WALL F 305.02 305.02 WALL G 396.26 472.37 WALL H 115.48 178.12 WALL i 151.35 151.35 WALL J 34.08 34.08 WALL K 38.34 38.34 WALL L 117.04 117.04 WALL M 67.81 67.81 WALL N 54.56 54.56 WALL 0 5.67 5.67 WALL P 123.26 123.26 WALL Q 141.75 141.75 TOTALS 1550.62 1689.37 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1550.62 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1689.37 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 1550.62 sf / 1689.37 sf = .918 X 100 = 91.8 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1494.56 sf 1494.56 sf X 91.8% = 1372.01 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION WALL K Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1372.01 sf LOWER LEVEL 99.55 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 66.49 sf. AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL K -EXPOSED WALL AREA = 38.34 sf WALL K - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL K - TOTAL WALL AREA = 38.34 sf TOTAL 2115.52 sf 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2115.52 sf existing FAR = 384.48 sf available FAR for future development Garaae Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 340.05 sf Available Garage FAR 159.95 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 378.55 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 441.49 sf 441.49 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 66.49 sf 66.49 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 105 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24-15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 4 41 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 4_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 4 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 4-FAR 2 OO 2015 RBILL POSS CHITTEC URDE AND PLANNING, P.0 LLa MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION No Scale THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. N 00 0 Ln 0 N 0 LL V) 0 M Ln CD CV .olE cc CD °O N Ln U o OJ N C L N O E � �C R C O LL. d MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING 3/16"=1'-0" V FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1372.01 sf LOWER LEVEL 99.55 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 66.49 sf. TOTAL 2115.52 sf 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2115.52 sf existing FAR = 384.48 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 340.05 sf Available Garage FAR 159.95 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 378.55 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 441.49 sf 441.49 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 66.49 sf 66.49 sf Counting towards FAR WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 4 41 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 4_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 4 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 4-FAR 3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. CV 00 O O CV I AREA OF LEVEL FL SYSTEM WALL C - EXPOSEC AREA = 4, WALL C = AREA = 1; WALL C = AREA = 1; 3/16"=1'-0" 3/16"=1'-0" 3/16"=1'-0" AREA = 37.96 sf 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 68.22 131.68 WALL B 19.66 37.96 WALL C 4.04 127.60 WALL D 17.94 37.96 TOTALS 109.86 335.20 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 109.86 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 335.20 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 109.86 sf / 335.20 sf = .328 X 100 = 32.8 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 136.39 sf 136.39 sf X .328 = 44.74 sf COUNTING FAR AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL A - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 68.22 sf WALL A - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 63.46 sf WALL A - TOTAL WALL AREA = 131.68 sf Is FAR CALCULATION - EXISTING Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 995.85 sf LOWER LEVEL 44.74 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 104.90 sf TOTAL 1722.96 sf 2500 sf allowable FAR - 1720.12 sf = 777.04 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 447.60 sf Available Garage FAR 52.40 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 443.17 sf Upper Level Deck Area 36.73 sf Total Deck Area 479.90 sf 479.90 sf (Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 104.90 sf 104.90 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 5 51 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 (5 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 5_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 5 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 5 -FAR 1 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 LLa 3/16"=1'-0" No Scale THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. MAIN LEVEL ROOF SYSTEM WALL i - EXPOSED \A AREA = 140.13 sf WALL i - SUB -GRADE AREA = 0 sf WALL i - TOTAL WALL AREA = 140.13 sf N 00 0 0 N W aJL JI This plant) per City of 26.575.02 WALL L WALL J WALL H MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/1 6"= 1'-0" L - WALL i WALL G MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" Unit 6 T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL H - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 86.27 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" WALL H - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 82.06 sf WALL H - TOTAL WALL AREA = 168.34 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" WALL G - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 120.58 sf WALL G - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 53.52 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" WALL G - TOTAL WALL AREA = 174.10 sf T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" WALL E - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 291.50 sf WALL E - SUB -GRADE WA AREA 0 sf WALL E - TOTAL WALL AREA = 291.50 sf UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL F - EXPOSED W) AREA = 422.19 sf WALL F - SUB -GRADE' AREA = 44.54 sf WALL F - TOTAL WALL AREA = 466.73 sf 3arage) It) WALL F WALL E WALL K MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/1 6"= 1'-0" )OF SYSTEM 'PER LEVEL KPOSED WALL 13 sf 1B-GRADE =0sf MN LEVEL L AREA VER LEVEL E @ BASEMENT LEVEL 'ER LEVEL MAIN LEVEL N LEVEL :R LEVEL BASEMENT LEVEL MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL E 291.50 291.50 WALL F 422.19 466.73 WALL G 120.58 174.10 WALL H 86.27 168.34 WALL i 140.13 140.13 WALL J 46.52 46.52 WALL K 140.13 140.13 WALL L 248.60 248.60 TOTALS 1495.92 1676.05 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1495.92 sf. TOTAL WALL AREA = 1676.05 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 1495.92 sf / 1676.05 sf = .893 X 100 = 89.3 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1115.17 sf 1115.17 sf X .893 = 995.85 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION - EXISTING Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 995.85 sf LOWER LEVEL 44.74 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 104.90 sf TOTAL 1722.96 sf 2500 sf allowable FAR - 1720.12 sf = 777.04 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 447.60 sf Available Garage FAR 52.40 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 443.17 sf Upper Level Deck Area 36.73 sf Total Deck Area 479.90 sf 479.90 sf (Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 104.90 sf 104.90 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 8 16 11 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 5 51 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 5_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 5 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION FAR 2 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/ 16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION No Scale N 00 O Ln O N Ln 0 V) 0 M Ln CD O CV .olE cc CD °O N Ln U o OJ N C L N O� �E � C R C O LL d Unit 6 ,f----j UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION - EXISTING lrage) Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATIONS - EXISTING No Scale Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 995.85 sf LOWER LEVEL 44.74 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 104.90 sf TOTAL 1722.96 sf 2500 sf allowable FAR - 1720.12 sf = 777.04 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 447.60 sf Available Garage FAR 52.40 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 443.17 sf Upper Level Deck Area 36.73 sf Total Deck Area 479.90 sf 479.90 sf (Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 104.90 sf 104.90 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 51 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 5_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 5 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION FAR 3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. EXPOSED WALL AREP 135.61 S.F TOTAL WALL AREA = 199.50 S.F 1EL 160'-0-MAIN LEVEL Y EL.0O" PWD. LOWER LEVE_ L. 94 '-6"6" FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - LOWER LEVEL 3/16"=1'-0" = 38.51 S.F. WALL F WALL D FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - LOWER LEVEL 3/16"=1'-0" LOWER LEVEL FLOORPLATE = 269.85 S.F. WALL C T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL E L. 104'-6" T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E L. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL E L. 94'-6' T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEV EL. 100'-0" EL. 100'-0" EXPOSED WALL ARE = 4.49 S.F. T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EXPOSED WALL ARE EL. 94'-6' = 8.15 S.F. TOTAL WALL AREA = 12.64 S.F. T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL T.O. CONCRETE @ BA EL. 92'-2" EL. 92'-2" AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE EXPOSED WALL AREA = 66.88 S.F T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" TOTAL WALL AREA = 129.09 S.F T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 94'-6' SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 62.21 S.F. T.OE @ BASEMENT LEVEL 1. 9C ' N FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - LOWER LEVEL 3/1 6"= 1'-0" WALL E WALL C T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 94'-6" FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - LOWER LEVEL 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (s.f.) TOTAL WALL AREA (s.f.) WALLA 66.88 129.09 WALL B 47.33 91.33 WALL C 0 112.95 WALL D 11.70 46.27 WALL E 4.49 12.64 WALL F 18.37 38.51 TOTALS 149.68 433.37 LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 149.68 S.F. TOTAL WALL AREA =433.37 S.F. % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 149.68 S.F. / 433.37 S.F. _ .345 X 100 = 34.5 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 269.85 S.F. 269.85 S.F. X .345 = 93.09 S.F. COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.48 s.f. MAIN LEVEL 1116.19 s.f. LOWER LEVEL 93.09 s.f. GARAGE 0 s.f. DECKS 103.47 s.f. TOTAL 1892.12 s.f. 60.88 S.F.AVAILABLE FAR FOR DEVELOPMENT Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA Existing Garage (Carport) Available Garage FAR Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area ° Upper Level Deck Area E Total Deck Area 478.47 s.f. ( Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 103.47 s.f. Counting towards FAR 500.00 s.f. 361.36 s.f. 138.64 s.f. 409.92 s.f. 36.84 s.f. 478.47 s.f. 103.47 s.f. poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: SD 10-09-14 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME PARCEL61 61 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: AMT - FAR Unit 6 example.dwg SHEET TITLE EXISTING LOWER FAR LEVEL FAR CALCULATIONS 6 - FAR1 LL d LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATIONS No Scale OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. AREA INDICATES EXPOSED WALL P TO BE CALCULATE UPPER FLOOR FAI AREA OF UPPER L FLOOR STRUCTUF EXPOSED WALL A = 416.33 S.F TOTAL WALL ARE) = 469.86 S.F SUB -GRADE WALL = 53.53 S.F. FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL 3/16"=1'-0" FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL 3/16"=1'-0" WALL i kREA =D AS R .EVEL RE LEVEL JN LEVEL REA J .EVEL 4 J . AREA J LEVEL T�0. PWD. -UPPER LEVEL E L. 104'-6" 1.0 . CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL ELF VAIN LEVEL E . 100'-0" T�WER LEVEL EL. 94'-6" EXPOSED' = 301.51 S. TOTAL WA =301.51 S.F WALL i 'ES LL AREA -ATED AS ZFAR ER LEVEL ;TURE 'PER LEVEL � MAIN LEVEL _L AREA i ;IN LEVEL \REA i /ALL AREA i VER LEVEL Y EL.94'-6" FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL 3/ 16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL.104'-6" TOTAL WALL AREA O = 162.22 S.F. EXPOSED WALL AREA O = 162.22 S.F. T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL.94'-6" WALL G WALL O FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (s.f.) TOTAL WALL AREA (s.f.) WALL G 301.51 301.51 WALL H 416.33 469.86 WALL i 113.50 171.93 WALL J 56.81 111.14 WALL K 142.37 142.37 WALL L 56.40 56.40 WALL M 17.37 17.37 WALL N 47.65 47.65 WALL 0 162.22 162.22 WALL P 235.38 235.38 TOTALS 1549.54 1715.83 FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.48 s.f. MAIN LEVEL 1116.19 s.f. LOWER LEVEL 93.09 s.f. GARAGE 0 s.f. DECKS 103.47 s.f. MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL- TOTAL 1892.12 s.f. WALL J 60.88 S.F.AVAILABLE FAR FOR DEVELOPMENT TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1549.54 S.F. TOTAL WALL AREA = 1715.83 S.F. % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA Garage Calculation Carport Area = 1549.54 S.F. / 1715.83 S.F. _ 361.36 s.f. .900 X 100 = 90 %EXPOSED WALL AREA Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 s.f. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1240.22 S.F. Existing Garage (Carport) 361.36 s.f. 1240.22 S.F. X .90 = 1116.19 S.F. COUNTING FAR Available Garage FAR 138.64 s.f. Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 409.92 s.f. Upper Level Deck Area 36.84 s.f. Total Deck Area 478.47 s.f. 478.47 s.f. ( Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 103.47 s.f. 103.47 s.f. Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: SD 10-09-14 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24,15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME PARCEL61 61 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: AMT - FAR Unit 6 example.dwg SHEET TITLE EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATIONS 6 - FAR2 LL d MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATIONS No Scale OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL FOSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. EXPOSE = 47.65 TOTALV = 47.65 ELEL. 10 ELL L. 94 WALL N WALL L FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL 3/16"=1'-0" ,� UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" M--L, Arno EXPOSED WALL AREA = 235.38 S.F. TOTAL WALL AREA P = 235.38 S.F. � T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL.100'-0" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEI EL.94'-6' TOTAL WALL AREA L = 56.40 S.F. EXPOSED WALL AREA L = 56.40 S.F. EL 160D. - MAIN LEVEL 'f EL.00'-0" T.OPWD LOWER LEVEL 'f EL.94'-6" TOTAL WALL AREA K = 142.37 S.F. EXPOSED WALL AREA K = 142.37 S.F. TOTAL WALL AREA M = 17.37 S.F. EXPOSED WALL AREA M = 17.37 S.F. T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-O" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E L. 100'-0" J T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL.94'-6" FAR WALL CALCULATIONS -MAIN LEVEL 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL M WALL K L----------------------------� - T.0.PWD.LOWERLEVEL EL. 94'-6" FAR WALL CALCULATIONS - MAIN LEVEL 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.48 s.f. MAIN LEVEL 1116.19 s.f. LOWER LEVEL 93.09 s.f. GARAGE 0 s.f. DECKS 103.47 s.f. TOTAL 1892.12 s.f. 60.88 S.F.AVAILABLE FAR FOR DEVELOPMENT Garaae Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA Existing Garage (Carport) 500.00 s.f. 361.36 s.f. Available Garage FAR 138.64 s.f. Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 409.92 s.f. Upper Level Deck Area 36.84 s.f. Total Deck Area 478.47 s.f. 478.47 s.f. ( Total deck ) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 103.47 s.f. 103.47 s.f. Counting towards FAR FAR CALCULATIONS 1 No Scale poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I :j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: SD 10-09-14 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24,15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME PARCEL61 61 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: AMT - FAR Unit 6 example.dwg SHEET TITLE EXISTING UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATIONS 6 - FAR3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. U- d AREA OF MAIN LEVEI FLOOR SYSTEM .j, T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVI r EL.100'-0" WALL C = EXPOSED 1 AREA = 0 sf WALL C - SUB -GRADE AREA = 131.68 sf WALL C = TOTAL WAL AREA = 131.68 sf T.O. CONCRETE @ BAE EL. 92'-2" In N 00 0 0 N t\ 0 0 0 0 AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL B - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 20.15 sf WALL B - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 17.80 sf WALL B TOTAL WALL AREA = 37.96 sf 11A T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL 104'-6" _ T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL E L. 103'-7" _ T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E L. 100'-0" LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL C LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - WEST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 94'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" T.OL. 9WER LEVEL T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL E4'-6" EL. 94'-6' WALL A LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - EAST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL 0 EL.100'-0" WALL A - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 68.22 S.F WALL A - TOTAL WALL AREA = 131.68 S.F T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEUDECK EL.94'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL.92'-2" WALL A - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 63.46 S.F. N LEVEL =R LEVEL WALL D - TOTAL WALL Y EL. 92'-2" AREA = 37.96 sf WALL D LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 68.22 131.68 WALL B 20.15 37.96 WALL C 0 131.68 WALL D 18.20 37.96 TOTALS 106.57 339.28 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 106.57 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 339.28 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 106.57 sf / 339.28 sf = .314 X 100 = 31.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 136.39 sf 136.39 sf x .314 = 42.83 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 992.50 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.83 sf GARAGE 0 sf DECKS 150.92 sf TOTAL 1763.72 sf 2500 sf allowable - 1763.72 existing = 736.28 sf AVAILABLE FAR FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Garage Calculation Allowable Garage sf per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 461.82 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is <500 sf - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 473.72 sf Upper Level Deck Area 52.20 sf Total Deck Area 525.92 sf 525.92 sf (Total deck ) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 150.92 sf 150.92 sf Counting towards FAR BASEMENT LEVEL poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 7 71 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 7_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 7 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 7-FAR 1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION No Scale OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. CV 00 0 0 CV r` 0 C3 Cz CD Ln 0 CV .old °a CD U o OJ N C L N O �E � C R C O U_ d AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL F - EXPOSED WAL AREA = 310.55 sf WALL F - SUB -GRADE W AREA = 44.08 sf WALL F - TOTAL WALL AREA = 354.63 sf WALL i - SUB-GRADI AREA = 0 sf WALL Ii = EXPOSED AREA = 161.55 sf WALL i - TOTAL WAL AREA = 161.55 sf W M Storage 32 sf This area sf per City sect. 26.5' T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL E T�� MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL G - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 118.78 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL 160F 1EL4 LEVEL EL. 94'-6" T.O. CONCRETE BASEMENT LEVEL E T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E WALL G - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 55.32 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 94'-6" WALL G - TOTAL WALL AREA = 174.10 sf WALL i WALL G MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - WEST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" garage) pt) WALL E - SUB -GRADE WALL WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL E - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 291.50 sf WALL E - TOTAL WALL AREA = 291.50 sf WALL L WALL E T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL ELF T�� MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" 1.0. PWD. -MAIN LEVEL EL100'-0-0" T §446 LEVEL EL. 94'-6" L T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2' WALL K MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - EAST ELEVATION 3/1 6"= 1'-0" WALL J WALL H AREA OF UPPER LEVEL =LOOR SYSTEM T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" CEILIN G @ MAIN LEVEL ELL. 103'-7" WALL H - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 97.66 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL.100'-0" WALL H - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 75.33 sf WALL H - TOTAL WALL AREA = 172.98 sf J T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL.94'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL E 291.50 291.50 WALL F 310.55 354.63 WALL G 118.78 174.10 WALL H 97.66 172.98 WALL i 161.55 161.55 WALL J 52.84 52.84 WALL K 151.87 151.87 WALL L 236.04 236.04 TOTALS 1420.79 1595.91 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1420.79 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1595.91 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 1420.79 sf / 1595.91 sf = .890 X 100 = 89.0 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1115.17 sf 1115.17 sf X .890 = 992.50 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 992.50 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.83 sf GARAGE 0 sf DECKS 150.92 sf TOTAL 1763.72 sf 2500 sf allowable - 1763.72 existing = 736.28 sf AVAILABLE FAR FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Garage Calculation Allowable Garage sf per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 461.82 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is <500 sf - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 473.72 sf Upper Level Deck Area 52.20 sf Total Deck Area 525.92 sf 525.92 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 150.92 sf 150.92 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 7 71 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 7_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 7 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 7-FAR 2 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. N 00 O Ln O N r\ 0 V) 0 M Ln CD O CV .olE °O CD N Ln U o OJ N C L N O E � �C R C O LL. d LUnit UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" 3arage) WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 992.50 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.83 sf GARAGE 0 sf DECKS 150.92 sf TOTAL 1763.72 sf 2500 sf allowable - 1763.72 existing = 736.28 sf AVAILABLE FAR FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Garage Calculation Allowable Garage sf per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 461.82 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is <500 sf - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 473.72 sf Upper Level Deck Area 52.20 sf Total Deck Area 525.92 sf 525.92 sf (Total deck ) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 150.92 sf 150.92 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME REMODEL 71 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 7_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 7 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 7-FAR 3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. MAIN LEVEL SYSTEM WALL C - EA AREA = 0 sf WALL C - EX WALL AREA TOTAL WALI = 131.68 sf N 00 O O N 00 0 V) C3 M Ln CD O CV .olE °O CD N Ln U o OJ N C L N N O E � C CD -o iLL_ a WALL C L11/_110.1 LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - WEST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" Unit 9 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" ER LEVEL _ _ I]- J1E 1_ _ _ _ T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" j, T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" AREA OF FLOOR STRUCTURE N LEVEL T.O. PWD. -MAIN LEVEL E L. 100'-0" MAIN LEVEL T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL E L. 103'-7" EXPOSED WALL AREA = 68.21 sf VER LEVEL j, T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 63.42 sf BASEMENT LEVEL L T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" TOTAL WALL AREA WALL A = 131.67 sf ("- LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - EAST ELEVATION 5 3/16"=1'-0" � T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL DOOM-0" T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL EL. 103'-7" J T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL.95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" AREA = 37.96 sf LOWER LEVEL 3/16"=1'-0" WALL D WALL CALC. - SOUTH ELEVATION WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (so TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 68.21 131.42 WALL B 19.66 37.96 WALL C 0 131.68 WALL D 18.29 37.96 TOTALS 106.16 339.02 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 106.16 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 339.02 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 106.16 sf / 339.02 sf = .313 X 100 = 31.3 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 136.39 sf 136.39 sf X .317 = 42.69 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION. No Scale T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL E L104'-6" T.O. PWD. -MAIN LEVEL EL 1001-01, T.O. CEILING @ MAIN LEVEL E T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL E FAR CALCULATION - EXISTING Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1001.42 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.69 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 169.35 sf TOTAL 1790.93 sf 2500 sf available FAR - 1790.93 sf existing FAR = 709.07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 461.82 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 507.62 sf Upper Level Deck Area 36.73 sf Total Deck Area 544.35 sf 544.35 sf (Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 169.35 sf 169.35 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 8 81 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 8_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 8 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 8 -FAR 1 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL F - EXPOSED W AREA = 419.08 sf WALL F - SUB -GRADE AREA = 45.07 sf WALL F - TOTAL WALL AREA = 464.15 sf N 00 0 0 N 00 I- WALL F MAIN LEVEL R SYSTEM WALL i - EXPO; AREA = 144.17 WALL i - SUB-C AREA = 0 sf WALL i - TOTAL AREA = 144.17 W/ M; MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/1 6"= l'-O" WALL i WALL G MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - WEST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" Unit 9 LEVEL N LEVEL EVEL LEVEL BASEMENT LEVEL LEVEL IN LEVEL LOOR .EVEL 3ED WALL f TRADE 2.88 sf 2 LEVEL WALL G - TOTAL WALL AREA = 172.08 sf T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL 92'-2' garage) WALL E - EXPOSEI AREA = 288.19 sf WALL E - SUB-GRE AREA 0 sf WALL E - TOTAL V% AREA = 288.19 sf WALL E WALL K MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - EAST ELEVATION 3/1 6"= l'-O" WALL L WALL J WALL H MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL E 288.19 288.19 WALL F 419.08 464.15 WALL G 119.20 172.08 WALL H 98.88 172.38 WALL i 144.17 144.17 WALL J 46.52 46.52 WALL K 141.99 141.99 WALL L 1 254.06 1 254.06 TOTALS 1512.09 1683.54 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1512.09 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1683.54 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 1512.09 sf / 1683.54 sf = .898 X 100 = 89.8 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1115.17 sf 1115.17 sf x 89.8% = 1001.42 sf COUNTING FAR aGE ROOF R LEVEL ISED WALL >f TRADE sf LEVEL REA LEVEL ? BASEMENT LEVEL T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. CEILING @ UPPER LEVEL aw0xVIII&A MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL H - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 98.88 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" WALL H - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 73.50 sf WALL H - TOTAL WALL AREA = 172.38 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2' FAR CALCULATION - EXISTING Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1001.42 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.69 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 169.35 sf TOTAL 1790.93 sf 2500 sf available FAR - 1790.93 sf existing FAR = 709.07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 461.82 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 507.62 sf Upper Level Deck Area 36.73 sf Total Deck Area 544.35 sf 544.35 sf (Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 169.35 sf 169.35 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 8 81 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 8_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 8 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 8-FAR 2 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION No Scale N 00 O Ln O N 00 0 V) 0 M Ln CD O CV .olE °O CD N Ln U o OJ N C L N O �E � C R C O LL d JAMC UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION - EXISTING Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1001.42 sf LOWER LEVEL 42.69 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 169.35 sf TOTAL 1790.93 sf 2500 sf available FAR - 1790.93 sf existing FAR = 709.07 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 461.82 sf Available Garage FAR 38.18 sf Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 507.62 sf Upper Level Deck Area 36.73 sf Total Deck Area 544.35 sf 544.35 sf (Total deck) - 375 s.f. (Allowable deck) 169.35 sf 169.35 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 8 81 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 8_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 8 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION FAR 3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. N 00 0 LS7 0 N 0 Li 0 cc c a.� a to LO ol� M � W U o Q) N CD L'J L N N / J CD E cc C a.) = LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. -NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL C - EXPOSED AREA = 0 sf WALL C - SUB-GRADI WALL AREA = 122.82 TOTAL WALL AREA = 122.82 sf WALL C LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - WEST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" Up I� III -II Ir �I I�-III I� �I II Ir II I - I� II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II - --- --- --- LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" _ T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E T�- BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 100'-O" _ T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL ELL 5 6 T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1" T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" Lower Level Floorplate = 316.02 sf WALL C LD FAR Key Counting FAR N LEVEL CTURE N LEVEL IEMENT LEVEL 'OSED WALL sf R LEVEL 3-GRADE = 60.19 sf FAL WALL 90 sf Q BASEMENT LEVEL LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. -EAST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL E WALL D 'ER LEVEL N LEVEL 3ASEMENT LEVEL :R LEVEL BASEMENT LEVEL LOWER LEVEL WALL CALC. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 64.71 120.90 WALL B 45.01 90.02 WALL C 0 122.82 WALL D 8.69 52.45 WALL E 17.91 37.59 TOTALS 136.32 423.78 LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 136.32 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 423.78 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 136.32 sf / 423.78 sf = .322 X 100 = 32.2 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 316.02 sf 316.02 sf X .32.3% = 101.76 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1422.52 sf LOWER LEVEL 101.76 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 110.56 sf. TOTAL 2212.31 sf 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2212.31 sf existing FAR = 287.69 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 s.f. Existing Garage (Carport) 361.36 s.f. Available Garage FAR 138.64 s.f. Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 422.62 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 485.56 sf 485.56 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 110.56 sf 110.56 sf Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 8 16 11 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24-15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 9 91 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 9_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 9 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 9 -FAR 1 2015 AILL POSS AIATES RCHITEC URDE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. U-a AREA OF UPPER L FLOOR SYSTEM WALL F - EXPOSE[ AREA = 427.27 sf WALL F - SUB-GRA AREA = 45.57 sf WALL F - TOTAL W, AREA = 472.84 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE N 00 0 0 N 0 v) 0 Cz Ln CD CV .olE °O CD N Ln U o OJ N C L N O E � C R C O U_ d WALL N p E WALL H WALL L - EXPOSED WALL - AREA = 67.81 sf WALL L - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL L = TOTAL WALL AREA = 67.81 sf WALL M - EXPOSED WALL ° a AREA = 262.75 sf WALL M - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf 4° ° ° ° WALL M = TOTAL WALL ° a ° AREA = 262.75 sf ° ° ° a ° Q° AREA OF SOLARIUM ROOF SYSTEM ° ° ° 441 a ° I I I I - -F - - - - - - - - - - - - I I II MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - WEST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" WALL H - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 151.35 sf WALL H - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL H - TOTAL WALL AREA = 151.35 sf AREA OF GARAGE ROOF SYSTEM T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL EL. 100'-0" _ T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99 .. LINE OF EXISTING GRADE _ T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL E.L. 92'-2" T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E T.O. CEILING - BASEMENT LEVEL EL 1001-01, T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL�95'-6-6" TOTE @ BASEMENT LEVEL Y EL.92'-2" WALL E - EXPOSE[ AREA = 305.02 sf WALL E - SUB-GRA AREA 0 sf WALL E - TOTAL W. AREA = 305.02 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE MAIN LEVEL ROOF SYSTEM WALL K - EXPOSE[ AREA = 117.01 sf WALL K - SUB-GRA AREA = 0 sf WALL K - TOTAL W, AREA = 117.07 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE �R Key �- Counting FAR Deck Area ++++++ Carport Area (Garage) ALL G LL H ort Area 3.05 sf AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM T.O. PWD. - UPPER LEVEL EL. 104'-6" WALL G - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 111.07 sf T.O. PWD. - MAIN LEVEL E L. 100'-0" T.O. CEILING -BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 99'-1' WALL G - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 58.94 sf T.O. PWD. LOWER LEVEL EL. 95'-6" WALL G - TOTAL WALL AREA = 170.01 sf I I I L 1 _ _ _ _ _ T.O. CONCRETE @ BASEMENT LEVEL EL. 92'-2" MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - EAST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" MAIN LEVEL WALL CALC. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL E 305.02 305.02 WALL F 427.27 472.84 WALL G 111.07 170.01 WALL H 151.35 151.35 WALL i 34.08 34.08 WALL J 38.34 38.34 WALL K 117.01 117.01 WALL L 67.81 67.81 WALL M 262.75 262.75 WALL N 210.19 210.19 TOTALS 1724.89 1829.40 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1724.89 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1829.40 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 1724.89 sf / 1829.40 sf = .943 X 100 = 94.3 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1508.51 sf 1508.51 sf X 94.3% = 1422.52 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale RAGE ROOF POSED WALL 9 sf LARIUM :M TAL WALL 19 sf N LEVEL ;EMENT LEVEL _R LEVEL BASEMENT LEVEL FAR CALCULATION WALL J Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1422.52 sf LOWER LEVEL 101.76 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 110.56 sf. AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM WALL J -EXPOSED WALL AREA = 38.34 sf WALL J - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL J - TOTAL WALL AREA = 38.34 sf TOTAL 2212.31 sf 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2212.31 sf existing FAR = 287.69 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 s.f. Existing Garage (Carport) 361.36 s.f. Available Garage FAR 138.64 s.f. Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 422.62 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 485.56 sf 485.56 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 110.56 sf 110.56 sf Counting towards FAR oss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 8 16 11 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION UNit 9 91 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 9_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 9 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 9-FAR 2 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. N 00 0 Ln 0 N 0 LL V) 0 M Ln CD CV .olE °O CD N Ln U o OJ N C L N O E � �C R C O LL. d MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING 3/16"=1'-0" 7 FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 FAR + 500 Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 s.f. Garage 500 s.f. Decks = 2500 s.f. x .15 = 375 s.f. UPPER LEVEL 577.47 sf MAIN LEVEL 1422.52 sf LOWER LEVEL 101.76 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 110.56 sf. TOTAL 2212.31 sf 2500 sf (allowable FAR) - 2212.31 sf existing FAR = 287.69 sf available FAR for future development Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 s.f. Existing Garage (Carport) 361.36 s.f. Available Garage FAR 138.64 s.f. Existing Garage is <500 s.f. - Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Main Level Deck Area 422.62 sf Upper Level Deck Area 62.94 sf Total Deck Area 485.56 sf 485.56 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 110.56 sf 110.56 sf Counting towards FAR WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 9 91 Aspen Meadows Trustee Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21517.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 9_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 9 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION FAR 3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. b4 CV 00 0 Ln 0 CV 0 WALL D WALL C LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. - #10 - DINING EL. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. - #10 - LIVING EL. 99'-0" T.O. PWD. #10 - LOWER EL. 89'-0" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PWD. - #10 - UPPER EL. 112'-0" AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM T.O. PWD. - #10 - DINING EL. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. - #10 - LIVING EL. 99'-0" WALL D - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 29.63 sf WALL D - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 8.71 sf WALL D - TOTAL WALL AREA = 38.33 sf LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PWD. #10 - LOWER EL. 89'-0" LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/1 6"= l'-O" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 0.00 39.00 WALL B 0.00 42.17 WALL C 27.71 69.00 WALL D 29.63 38.33 WALL E 138.40 172.87 WALL F 204.00 204.00 WALL G 42.38 42.38 WALL H 129.75 129.75 WALL i 207.31 245.25 WALL J 0.00 373.75 TOTALS 779.18 1356.50 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 779.18 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1356.50 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 779.18 sf / 1356.50 sf = .574 X 100 = 57.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1272.00 sf 1272.00 sf X .574 = 730.13 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1202.06 sf LOWER LEVEL 730.13 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 407.22 sf TOTAL 3154.41 sf 3144.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 654.41 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (128.00 sf + 176.00 sf) 304.00 sf Total Deck Area 782.22 sf 782.22 sf ( Total deck ) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 407.22 sf = 407.22 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 12-10-14 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 10 101 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 10_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 10 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10-FAR 2 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION No Scale OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. T.O. PWD. - "0 - DINII E L. 100'-0" T.O. PWD.-#10-LIVIN E L. 99'-0' T.O. PWD. #10 - LOWEF EL. 89'-0" b4 CV 00 0 0 CV CD 0 LL V) 0 M CD Ln CV .olE °O CD N uS U o OJ N C L N O E � �C R C O LL d WALL D WALL C LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" 'PER 10O-UPPER TEL2 STING GRADE LINE OF EXISTING GRADE IARAGE T.O. CONC. #10 -GARAGE EL. TO3' O 0 - KITCHEN 1 - ENTRY T.O. PWD. #10 - MAIN E L. 100'-0" WALL B - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL B - SUB -GRADE WAL AREA = 42.17 sf WALL B - TOTAL WALL AREA = 42.17 sf T.O. PWD. #10 -LOWER _ EL. 89'-O" LOWER LEVEL WALL CA LCS . - EAST ELEVATION 3/1 6"= l'-O" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 0.00 39.00 WALL B 0.00 42.17 WALL C 27.71 69.00 WALL D 29.63 38.33 WALL E 138.40 172.87 WALL F 204.00 204.00 WALL G 42.38 42.38 WALL H 129.75 129.75 WALL i 207.31 245.25 WALL J 0.00 373.75 TOTALS 779.18 1356.50 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 779.18 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1356.50 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 779.18 sf / 1356.50 sf = .574 X 100 = 57.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1272.00 sf 1272.00 sf X .574 = 730.13 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1202.06 sf LOWER LEVEL 730.13 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 407.22 sf TOTAL 3154.41 sf 3144.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 654.41 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (128.00 sf + 176.00 sf) 304.00 sf Total Deck Area 782.22 sf 782.22 sf ( Total deck ) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 407.22 sf = 407.22 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: HPC 12-10-14 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 10 101 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 10_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 10 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10-FAR 1 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. T.O. PWD. - #10-DINING _ EL. MOD%" T.O. PWD. - #10 - LIVING _ EL. 99'-0" T.O. PWD. #10 -LOWER EL. 89'-U b4 CV 00 0 Ln 0 CV 0 0 LL V) 0 M CD Ln CV .olE °O CD N Ln U o OJ N C L N O E � �C R C O LL. d Main L, = 239.' Main L, = 1241 WALL K ►UT%1IIII•�/ WALL U WALL T WALL S MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" rfj--� MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" 'PER 0O -UPPERTEL1�12'- 'PER LEVEL TEM (POSED WALL 59 sf WALL T - EXPOSED WALL 1B-GRADE WALL AREA = 33.67 sf WALL T - SUB -GRADE WA )TAL WALL AREA = 12.5 sf .59 sf WALL T - TOTAL WALL AREA = 45.17 sf IARAGE T.O. CONC. #10 - GARAGE _ EL. 103'-0" STING GRADE 0 - KITCHEN LINE OF EXISTING GRADE 1 - ENTRY T.O. PWD. #10 - MAIN _ EL. 100% T.O. PWD. #10 - LOWER _ EL. 89'-0" MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION 3/1 6"= l'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL K 304.87 304.87 WALL L 254.62 254.62 WALL M 68.76 68.76 WALL N 142.76 142.76 WALL 0 381.47 381.47 WALL P 171.33 171.33 WALL Q 182.59 182.59 WALL R 133.67 182.67 WALL S 46.64 49.91 WALL T 33.67 45.17 WALL U 143.33 143.33 WALL V 45.47 45.47 TOTALS 1909.18 1972.95 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1909.18 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1972.95 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 1909.18 sf / 1972.95 sf = .968 X 100 = 96.8 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1241.80 sf 1241.80 sf X .968 = 1202.06 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1202.06 sf LOWER LEVEL 730.13 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 407.22 sf TOTAL 3154.41 sf 3144.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 654.41 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (128.00 sf + 176.00 sf) 304.00 sf Total Deck Area 782.22 sf 782.22 sf ( Total deck ) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 407.22 sf = 407.22 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-12.15 FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 10 101 Trusteel Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 10_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 10 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10-FAR 3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. b4 CV 00 0 0 CV 0 0 V) 0 M CD Ln CV .olE °O CD N Ln U o OJ N C L N N O � E � C CD -o LL. a Main L, = 239.' Main L, = 1241 WALL V WALL T WALL S MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" rn--� MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. - #10 - DINING EL. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. - #10 - LIVING EL. 99'-0" T.O. PWD. #10 - LOWER EL. 89'-0" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PWD. - #10 - UPPER EL. 112'-0" WALL V - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 45.47 sf WALL V - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL V - TOTAL WALL AREA = 45.47 sf T.O. PWD. - #10 - DINING EL. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. - #10 - LIVING EL. 99'-0" LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PWD. #10 - LOWER EL. 89'-0" MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. -EAST ELEVATION 3/1 6"= 1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL K 304.87 304.87 WALL L 254.62 254.62 WALL M 68.76 68.76 WALL N 142.76 142.76 WALL 0 381.47 381.47 WALL P 171.33 171.33 WALL Q 182.59 182.59 WALL R 133.67 182.67 WALL S 46.64 49.91 WALL T 33.67 45.17 WALL U 143.33 143.33 WALL V 45.47 45.47 TOTALS 1909.18 1972.95 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 1909.18 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1972.95 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 1909.18 sf / 1972.95 sf = .968 X 100 = 96.8 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1241.80 sf 1241.80 sf X .968 = 1202.06 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1202.06 sf LOWER LEVEL 730.13 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 407.22 sf TOTAL 3154.41 sf 3144.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 654.41 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area Main Level Deck Area Urmer Level Deck Area Total Deck Area 128.00 sf + 176.00 782.22 sf ( Total deck ) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 407.22 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR 239.11 sf 239.11 sf 304.00 sf 782.22 sf 407.22 sf poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING I U 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-12.15 FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 10 101 Trusteel Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 10_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 10 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10-FAR 4 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. b4 CV 00 0 0 CV 0 0 V) 0 M Ln CD CV .olE U o CD OJ N C L N N O � E � C CD —o LL. a UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 I'gll'.�17[ay_1V FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 815.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1202.06 sf LOWER LEVEL 730.13 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 407.22 sf TOTAL 3154.41 sf 3144.50 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 654.41 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf <500 s.f. -Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (128.00 sf + 176.00 so 304.00 sf Total Deck Area 782.22 sf 782.22 sf ( Total deck ) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 407.22 sf = 407.22 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-12.15 FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 10 101 Trusteel Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 10_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 10 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 10-FAR 5 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. EPW L. 112' PW EL. 103'- b4 CV 00 0 Ln 0 CV LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" I - I --I rlonL VVPiLL J II II II II II II II II II I II II II T.O. PWD. #11 - KITCHEN EL. 1604%, 101 ENTRYTE 00� �' "1 -LIVINGTEL99-0 T.O. PWD. #11 -LOWER EL�g9 -p T.O. PWD.- 11 - UPPER_ EL. 112'-0' � T.O. PWD. -"11 - DINING EL. 100'-0" T.O. PWD. - #11 - LIVING EL. 99'-0" WALL H - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 129.00 sf WALL H - SUB -GRADE WA AREA = 0 sf WALL H - TOTAL WALL AREA = 129.00 sf T.O. PWD. - #11 - LOWER EL. 99'-U )SED WALL f .TRADE WALL f ,L WALL >f ING GRADE WALL F - TOTAL WALL WALL H WALL F AREA=204.75sf WALL D LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/1 6"= l'-O" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 0.00 41.72 WALL B 0.00 44.77 WALL C 62.01 77.61 WALL D 23.23 40.50 WALL E 167.83 167.83 WALL F 204.75 204.75 WALL G 47.08 47.08 WALL H 129.00 129.00 WALL i 234.57 272.50 WALL J 0.00 366.00 TOTALS 868.47 1391.76 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 868.47 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1391.76 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA WALL i = 868.47 sf / 1391.76 sf = .624 X 100 = 62.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1272.00 sf 1272.00 sf X .624 = 793.73 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 665.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1206.25 sf LOWER LEVEL 793.73 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 238.69 sf TOTAL 2903.67 sf 2865.00 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf < 500 s.f. - Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area 44.00 sf Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (154.38 sf + 176.00 sf) 330.58 sf Total Deck Area 613.69 sf 613.69 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 238.69 sf = 238.69 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 11 111 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 11_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 11 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11-FAR 1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION No Scale OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. T.O. PwD. #11- Low EL.89'-0' I4 CV 00 0 Ln 0 CV 0 LL V) 0 CD Ln CV .olE °O CD U o OJ N C L N O �E � C R C O LL. d LOWER LEVEL WALL CALCS. - SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" VV/ALL J LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" WALL i ) - UPPER 1 -GARAGE ENTRY LIVING WALL AREA WALL AREA WALL AREA WALL B WALL J T.O. PWD.- #11 - UPPER EL. 112'-0" AREA OF MAIN LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM T.O. CONC.- #11 - GARAGE EL. 102'-0" T.O. PWD. - #11 - MAIN EL. 100'-0" /ALL WALL T.O. PWD. - #11 - LOWER Y EL.89'-0" LOWER LEVEL WALL CA LCS . - EAST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - LOWER LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL A 0.00 41.72 WALL B 0.00 44.77 WALL C 62.01 77.61 WALL D 23.23 40.50 WALL E 167.83 167.83 WALL F 204.75 204.75 WALL G 47.08 47.08 WALL H 129.00 129.00 WALL i 234.57 272.50 WALL J 0.00 366.00 TOTALS 868.47 1391.76 % LOWER LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 868.47 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 1391.76 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 868.47 sf / 1391.76 sf = .624 X 100 = 62.4 % EXPOSED WALL AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1272.00 sf 1272.00 sf X .624 = 793.73 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 665.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1206.25 sf LOWER LEVEL 793.73 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 238.69 sf TOTAL 2903.67 sf 2865.00 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf < 500 s.f. - Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area 44.00 sf Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (154.38 sf + 176.00 sf) 330.58 sf Total Deck Area 613.69 sf 613.69 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 238.69 sf = 238.69 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 11 101 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 11_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 11 LOWER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 -FAR2 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. T.O. PWD. #11 - LOW EL. 89'-0" b4 CV 00 CD CV 0 V) 0 CD Ln CV .olE °O CD N Ln U o OJ N C L N N O E � C CD -o LL_ a MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. -SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" rn--� MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" 'PER LEVEL TEM UPPER (POSED WALL .58 sf 1B-GRADE WALL )TAL WALL .58 sf 1 -GARAGE ENTRY LIVING WALL T - EXP AREA = 66.95 WALL T - SUB AREA = 11.5 s WALL T - TOTj AREA = 78.45 AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM T.O. PWD.- #11 - UPPER EL. 112'-0" WALL )E WALL 4LL T.O. CONC.- #11 - GARAGE EL. 102'-0" T.O. PWD. - #11 - ENTRY EL. 100'-0" ` AREA =49.00 sf `^V� ^�� WALL R - TOTAL WALL AREA = 181.80 sf I I I I I I I I ------------------------------------------ - T.O. PWD. - # 11 - LOWER EL. 89'-0' WALL T WALL R WALL P MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - EAST ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL K 272.02 272.02 WALL L 251.14 251.14 WALL M 68.59 68.59 WALL N 162.60 162.60 WALL 0 496.37 496.37 WALL P 170.22 170.22 WALL Q 222.58 222.58 WALL R 132.80 181.80 WALL S 54.74 54.74 WALL T 66.95 78.45 WALL U 123.43 123.43 WALL V 66.73 66.73 TOTALS 2088.17 2148.67 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 2088.17 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 2148.67 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 2088.17 sf / 2148.67 sf = .972 X 100 = 97.2 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1241.80 sf 1241.80 sf X .972 = 1206.25 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 665.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1206.25 sf LOWER LEVEL 793.73 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 238.69 sf TOTAL 2903.67 sf 2865.00 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf < 500 s.f. - Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area 44.00 sf Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (154.38 sf + 176.00 sf) 330.58 sf Total Deck Area 613.69 sf 613.69 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 238.69 sf = 238.69 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 11 111 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 11_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 11 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 -FAR3 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. EPW L. 112'- WALL C AREA = WALL C AREA = WALL C AREA = PW EL. 103'- b4 CV 00 CD CV 0 V) 0 CD Ln CV .olE °O CD N Ln U o OJ N C L N N CD E � C CD -o iLL_ a MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - NORTH ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" rtj--� MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" T.O. PWD. #11 - KITCHEN ELL f01'-001 T1 -ENTRY EL. 100'-0" T�1 -LIVING EL. 99'-0" T.O. PWD. #11 -LOWER ELL 9 00 AREA OF UPPER LEVEL FLOOR SYSTEM � T.O. PWD.- 11 - UPPER_ EL. 112'-0" WALL N - EXPOSED WALL - AREA = 162.60 sf WALL N - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL N - TOTAL WALL AREA = 162.60 sf T.O. PWD. - #11 -DINING EL. 100'-01, T.O. PWD. - #11 -LIVING EL. 99'-0" T.O. PWD. - #11 - LOWER EL. 89'-0" M ��� =� L=-- WALL L - EXPOSED WALL - AREA = 251.14 sf WALL L - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL L - TOTAL WALL AREA = 251.14 sf WALL V - EXPOSED WALL AREA = 66.73 sf WALL V - SUB -GRADE WALL AREA = 0 sf WALL V - TOTAL WALL AREA = 66.73 sf L-J Li ------------- LINE OF EXISTING GRADE MAIN LEVEL WALL CALCS. - WEST ELEVATION 3/ 16"=1'-0" WALL % AREAS - MAIN LEVEL WALL DESIG. EXPOSED WALL AREA (sf) TOTAL WALL AREA (sf) WALL K 272.02 272.02 WALL L 251.14 251.14 WALL M 68.59 68.59 WALL N 162.60 162.60 WALL 0 496.37 496.37 WALL P 170.22 170.22 WALL Q 222.58 222.58 WALL R 132.80 181.80 WALL S 54.74 54.74 WALL T 66.95 78.45 WALL U 123.43 123.43 WALL V 66.73 66.73 TOTALS 2088.17 2148.67 % MAIN LEVEL FAR TOTAL TOTAL EXPOSED WALL AREA = 2088.17 sf TOTAL WALL AREA = 2148.67 sf % WALL AREA = EXPOSED WALL AREA / TOTAL WALL AREA = 2088.17 sf / 2148.67 sf = .972 X 100 = 97.2 % EXPOSED WALL AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLATE = 1241.80 sf 1241.80 sf X .972 = 1206.25 sf COUNTING FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 665.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1206.25 sf LOWER LEVEL 793.73 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 238.69 sf TOTAL 2903.67 sf 2865.00 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf < 500 s.f. - Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area 44.00 sf Main Level Deck Area 239.11 sf Upper Level Deck Area (154.38 sf + 176.00 sf) 330.58 sf Total Deck Area 613.69 sf 613.69 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) 238.69 sf = 238.69 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( T ) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 11 111 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 11_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 11 MAIN LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 - FAR 4 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. b4 CV 00 0 Ln 0 CV 0 LL V) 0 M Ln CD CV .olE U o CD OJ N C L N E � �C R C O LL. d = I in.uu sr II -— L---------------------------JI L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/16"=1'-0" FAR CALCULATION Zone District - SPA - Aspen Meadows 11 Town homes @ 2500 sf FAR + 500 sf Garage per SPA document, page 22, Reception #340937 Allowable FAR FAR 2500 sf Garage 500 sf Decks = 2500 sf FAR x .15 = 375 sf UPPER LEVEL 665.00 sf MAIN LEVEL 1206.25 sf LOWER LEVEL 793.73 sf GARAGE 0.00 sf DECKS 238.69 sf TOTAL 2903.67 sf 2865.00 Existing FAR - 2500 Allowable FAR = 403.67 sf over allowable FAR Garage Calculation Allowable Garage s.f. per SPA 500.00 sf Existing Garage (Carport) 459.28 sf Available Garage FAR 40.72 sf Existing Garage 459.28 sf < 500 s.f. - Allowable Garage Garage is exempt from FAR Deck Calculation Lower Level Deck Area Main Level Deck Area UDDer Level Deck Area Total Deck Area 154.38 sf + 176.00 613.69 sf (Total deck) - 375 sf (Allowable deck) = 238.69 sf Deck Area Counting towards FAR 44.00 sf 239.11 sf 330.58 sf 613.69 sf 238.69 sf WALL % AREAS - UPPER LEVEL Upper Level - The entire Upper level is above grade and counts towards FAR FAR CALCULATION No Scale poss ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING 1:j 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T) 970 / 925 4755 (F) 970 / 920 2950 Consultant Issue: 07-15-15 EXISTING FAR CALCULATION 08-24.15 REVISED FAR CALCULATION ASPEN MEADOWS TRUSTEE TOWNHOME FAR CALCULATION Unit 11 111 Trustee Townhome Lane Aspen, Colorado, 81611 NORTH PROJECT NO: 21421.00 DWG FILE: UNIT 11_20150812.dwg SHEET TITLE UNIT 11 UPPER LEVEL FAR CALCULATION 11 -FAR5 OO 2015 AILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.0 THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. BILL POSS AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. 0. 4 REBAR 1 "=20' 0 20 40 U.S. SURVEY FOOT =1 uL = ^O 00. n50 O^ CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT NO. 11 N19 731,26.. W 20.4 7' 26295 C.C.E P.O.B. SEWER EASEMENT LOT 1 THE ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION l V 68 S4 00 �,w 2p7. 61, N 68 S4 oo"!v 0 78 2? S7. 8 817.4' W� �) s o �tV o �E`7 UNIT 11 =o a ti �^ 1ST STORY DECK 7818.8' W� 66 2° o 23 7 y339" o� S4 a co o c N 9 04 • h Q)' oo� S ° 28 4 N o� oil ry UNIT 10 o 7823.1 �� O 7824.4' �v 23 N� Q ;l "I Q 79 s 2 c try' MM C �Q S 66 • s 7 a STo 1 O , 13 `39. 9 , N Ne F 8p 00 S S6• 03, 09 W� F xA s 79, 7831.4' UNIT 9 PATIO BUILDING 7836.2' UNIT '3a LOT 4 '86 THE ASPEN MEADOWS co� 70 SUBDIVISION VI 13 co �s CARPORT 2 ry 4 .6 UNIT 8 �, Ln Asa BUILDING v 7833.5' NN' 3 UNl T 8 PATIO 2�. 8 � UNIT 7837.9' Q). o 00 S 7p 12, .0 CARPORT V) 113 p8. 4q 6 N� UNIT 7 ROCK WALL BUILDING g8 N � 2.4 � 2.8 PATIO 7842.3' A UNIT 7 10 7834.9 V CARPORT G.C.E UNIT 6 S 77•17'31 'E 11g 92, 44.6 N N UNIT 6 GoBUILDING o � � N 14.2 N 0 7844.3' PATIO m o 7836.7' i� 0 /kNIT CARPORT 7-5 Z 6 N UNIT 5 S 84•20'47 E 113.51' 44.2 N UNIT 5 BUILDING N O 15.8 M Lo 21.4 7845.8' -13 26295 G.C.E. O� 0\ Q0 N 3 75' n 0.C.E zi d- C6 rn W 00 O z z w w U) Q w 0' j U 26295 O N 0 0 z G.C.E. NC. STEPS 25c 2 7839.3' z Q 05 CARPORT PATIO 7.0 UNIT 5 ❑ N 88.17'51"E -' 44.8 � O_ UNIT 4 ❑ UNIT 4 N N u BUILDING o cp 0 18.5 7846.2' 5.0 0 1.0 CARPORT PATIO 7841.6' cn 13.8 6.8 8.4 �� 6.52' cP E 81.28' O9 44.6 O N 4 � �U F <FOTR/O ��, FgsFMENI IL ASPEN MEADOWS NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR. UNIT N � UNIT 3 UNIT 3 N BUILDING � k 21.8 15. 7848.3, CARPORT � r PATIO 'I' 2 7843.5' N 1356+c�Z„� q4T N w UNIT 2 BUILDING 7850.1 n 0 845.7 cp 0 6.9 106 p6 job 00 TI N 6i•1 AMENDED SEWERLINE EASEMENT AREA 20'X 60' 6295 G. C. E. 7848.3' q P 7 UNIToi 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 1 THE ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION rn 25947 ME 26295 LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP WITH LS # AS DESCRIBED ❑ UTILITY BOX A SURVEY CONTROL Fv FIRE HYDRANT Q MANHOLE - X FENCE WATER VALVE G.C.E. GENERAL COMMON ELEMENT L.C.E. LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT FMR ELECTRICAL BOX AREA TABLE UNIT 1 6440 SF +/- UNIT 2 4871 SF +/- UNIT 3 4698 SF +/- 26295 UNIT 4 4973 SF +/- HORIZONTAL CONTROL UNIT 5 5161 SF +/- UNIT 6 5086 SF +/- UNIT 7 5340 SF +/- UNIT 8 4637 SF +/- UNIT 9 3938 SF +/- UNIT 10 3637 SF +/- UNIT 11 3507 SF +/- LOT 5, THE ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, IS ZONED R/MF-SPA. THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN ZONE "X" (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PREPARED BY F.E.M.A., FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO, COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 08097CO204 C, EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4, 1987 THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW HAZARD AREA AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, PROJECT NUMBER 1963, FIGURE ES-15. SLANTED TEXT DENOTES SPOT ELEVATIONS ELEVATIONS BASED ON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT NO. 20 (7906.41') LOT 1 THE ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATION: THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED DURING I _____ AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME, EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES, AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1 /15,000. DATED: JOHN M. HOWORTH P.L.S. 25947 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY "�. OF Q 37. ��. THE TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT -THE -ASPEN MEADOWS, A CONDOMINIUM SITUATED ON LOT 5 ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CITY OF ASPEN, dQ 37 COUNTY OF PITKIN, .0 STATE OF COLORADO. CONTAINING: 2.953 ACRES MORE OR LESS WATER EASEMENT G.C.E. rn/ 00,64. N -73 01, 6295 , CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT NO. 20 7906.41' RED CAP, ILLEGIBLE HOC FSS G� TO 0 3)F��0 �9Q', S r� sFF 600�F� OF z 28 O�q� qT �Ti AgcF s 295 VACATED SEWER EASEMENT PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE/FAX (970) 9253816 WWW.ASPEN SURVEYENGIN EERS.COM DATE JOB 04/15 25192R The Trustee Townhomes at the Aspen Meadows February 22, 2016 To whom it may concern, This is to verify that the following are the owners of the eleven Trustee Townhomes at the Aspen Meadows. Unit 1— Barry Smooke (Barry Smooke Aspen Trust) 2 —Victoria Lea Smith 3—The Aspen Institute, Inc, a Colorado Non -Profit Corporation 4 — Presley Reed (Presley Reed 1999 Family Trust) 5 —John J. and Ricki L. McHugh 6 — Nancy Furlotti (NSF 1976 Investments LLC) 7 —John G. and Jan Jones Sarpa 8 —The Aspen Institute, Inc., a Colorado Non -Profit Corporation 9 — Harris D. Sherman and Richard D. Lamm 10— Luciano and Giancarla Berti (KENROSS LUX S.A. a Luxembourg Corporation) 11- Marcia D. Strickland The above owners have authorized the Trustee Houses at the Aspen Meadows HOA to pursue the attached amendment to the Aspen Meadows SPA. Further, the HOA has authorized Bill Poss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. to act in their behalf on this matter. Their contact information is as follows: 605 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 925-4755 kweil@billposs.com For the record, the address of the subject property is.Lot 5 Aspen Meadows SPA with physical address of 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, 91, 101, and 111 Meadows Road Aspen, Colorado. Also enclosed are the Agreement to Pay Application Fees and Check #72078 for $4, 550 and the HOA Compliance Form. Sarpa� President Trustee Towhomes at Aspen Meadows 71 Meadows Trustee Rd Aspen, Co 81611 John@Johnsarpa.com 970-379-2595(C) pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING. January 22, 2016 Sara Nadolny City of Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Amendment to Aspen Meadows SPA as it Relates to the Trustee Houses Dear Sara, The HOA of the Trustee Townhomes at the Aspen Meadows would like to request an amendment to "The Aspen Meadows" Specially Planned Area Development & Subdivision Agreement. Specifically, this request is to amend paragraph II E of the agreement. Background Lot 5 of the Aspen Meadows development contains 11 townhouses collectively referred to as the Trustee Houses. Eight of these townhouses were constructed in the 1960's as part of the original Aspen Institute. The other three townhomes were constructed in the early 1990's as a result of the approval of the SPA. Paragraph II E of the subdivision agreement deals with the allowed floor area and bedroom counts for the Trustee Houses. The HOA is proposing to amend this paragraph to address both the allowed floor area and allowed bedroom count. A discussion of both of these items follows below. Floor Area The Aspen Meadows Development and Subdivision Agreement states that each of the eleven Trustee Houses is allowed 2,500 square feet of floor area calculated using the method in place at the time of the approval for the first three years and using the method in place at the time of permit submittal thereafter. In addition, the aggregate area for all 11 units was set at 27,500. Due to the existing conditions on the property and changes to the methodology of calculating floorarea, the HOA is requesting some adjustments to the allowed floor area requirements. Currently, all of the original 8 units are under the 2,500 square foot floor area limit while the newer three units constructed in the early 1990's are all over the 2,500 square foot limit. A table listing the floor area of each unit calculated using the methodology currently in place appears in Table 1 below. Table 1- Existing Floor of Trustee Houses (calculated to the nearest sf.) Unit 1 (newer unit) 2,943 sf. Unit 2 (original unit) 2,112 sf. Unit 3 (original unit) 1,836 sf. Unit 4 (original unit) 2,116 sf. Unit 5 (original unit) 1,723 sf. 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (0 970/925-4755 (0 970/920-2950 WWW.BILLPOSS.COM pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING Unit 6 (original unit) 1,786 sf.* Unit 7 (original unit) 1,764 sf. Unit 8 (original unit) 1,791 sf. Unit 9 (original unit) 2,212 sf. Unit 10 (newer unit) 3,154 sf. Unit 11 (newer unit) 2,904 sf. Total for all 11 Units 24,341 sf. * Unit 6 has a building permit in place to expand the floor area to 1,920 sf. by adding a basement. Construction work began in January 2016 with completion scheduled for the spring of 2017. Two factors can be used to explain the fact that the three newer townhomes are over the 2,500 sf. limit set forth in the Spa Agreement. First, the methodology for calculating floor area has changed over the approximately 23 years since they were constructed. In particular, the rules pertaining to garage space and below grade space have become more restrictive. It is not unusual for structures built before 2000 to have floor areas greater than would be allowed under the land use code today. The second reason for the overage of the newer townhomes arises from the fact that during the design process for the newer units, unit 3 and unit 8 signed their additional floor area over to the developer of the newer units. The building permit plans for these newer units were reviewed by the zoning and building departments and building permits were issued. The issue of the 2,500 sf maximum for an individual unit apparently never came up during the review process. The proposal we would like to put forward with respect to floor area is an attempt to update the SPA approval so that it is more in keeping with current land use codes. Specifically, we are proposing Table 2 below as a way to redistribute the floor area among the Trustee Houses. Table 2 — Redistributed Floor of Trustee Houses Unit 1 (newer unit) 3,154 sf. Unit 2 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 3 (original unit) 1,850 sf. Unit 4 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 5 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 6 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 7 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 8 (original unit) 1,850 sf. Unit 9 (original unit) 2,500 sf. Unit 10 (newer unit) 3,154 sf. Unit 11 (newer unit) 3,154 sf. Total for all 11 Units 28,150 sf. pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING The above table above effectively bridges the gap between the time of the original approval and today's land use code. It preserves the 2,500 square feet for the original units that did not assign their floor area while effectively sterilizing units 3 and 8 from future development. With respect to the newer units, the floor area is set at the limit of the largest existing unit. As you will notice the cumulative total for this proposal of 28,150 sf. is greater than the 27,500 sf. called for in the SPA agreement by 650 sf. We would argue that this increase is easily explained by the more restrictive rules regarding garages and below grade space. For instance, in 1993, below grade space was exempt if less than 10% of the wall area of a below grade space was exposed. Currently, below grade space begins to count against floor area as soon as any amount of wall is exposed. In addition to redistributing the floor as outlined in Table 2 above, we are making two additional requests with respect to floor area. First, since the original SPA agreement called for a 500 square foot exemption for carports and each of the original units has a carport of approximately this size and each of the newer units has a two car garage of this size, we would request that the 500 square foot exemption remain in place for this project. By allowing the garage floor area exemption to remain at 500 square feet, you eliminate the possibility of a unit becoming non- conforming simply because of the existing garage or carport. Secondly, we would request that the overall cumulative total requirement be removed from the approval. Since each of the 11 units is owned by an individual, it is an undue burden to expect each owner to calculate the floor area for the entire complex simply to remodel their individual unit. As has been pointed out, floor area calculation methodology is subject to changes over time and keeping a cumulative total requirement seems to make little sense as long as each individual unit conforms to the proposed redistributed floor area in Table 2 at the time of building permit submittal. Number of Bedrooms The original SPA limited the number of bedrooms to 3 per unit. This limit was tied to the affordable housing mitigation requirements at the time of the approval. We are asking to have the limit removed. This removal makes sense because currently, mitigation for affordable housing for individual residential permits is based on square footage of a residence and not the number of bedrooms. Since any redevelopment of a unit with the Trustee Houses development will be put forth by an individual owner, we are proposing that each unit satisfy the Growth Management regulations in place at the time of building permit submittal. In this way, the underlying reasons for the three bedroom limit is still addressed and the Growth Management regulations will be satisfied. Project Review Standards The following paragraphs address the review standards of Section 26.445.050 of the land use code. A. Compliance with Adopted Regulatory Plans. The proposed development complies with applicable regulatory plans. pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING Response. The intent of this request is to bring the SPA agreement into closer compliance with current land use policies. Older approvals such the Meadows SPA are often in conflict with current land use codes. The intent is to clarify the issue of floor area and subject any expansion of the individual units to current Growth Mitigation requirements. With respect to floor area the assignment of some floor area from two of the original units to the three newer units is made clear by this agreement. Any expansion of an individual unit will be subject to the Growth Mitigation requirements in place at the time of building permit. B. Development Suitability. The proposed Planned Development prohibits development on land unsuitable for development. Response. No direct development is requested as part of this amendment. Rather, as a result of this amendment, relatively modest expansion of the existing individual units may be proposed in the future. As individual units are submitted for building permit, they will be subject to the standards affecting site suitability including any required mitigation. C. Site Planning. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. Response. No direct development is proposed as part of this amendment. With limited ability for each unit to expand, it is hard to believe that any proposed expansion would impact the overall context or visual character of the neighborhood. In addition, any expansion of these units is subject to review by the Historic Preservation Commission whose guidelines clearly control the design of any expansion including the site plan. D. Dimensional Requirements. All dimensions, including density, mass, and height shall be established during the Project Review. Response. The SPA agreement for the Meadows did establish dimensional requirements for the Trustee Houses. The purpose of this amendment is to update and clarify some of those standards to make then more compatible with the current land use code. We feel the requests outlined earlier in this letter are in keeping with the overall intent of the original approval. The original approval contemplated the expansion of the original units. This amendment request clarifies some of the issues related to past construction on the property. It effectively sterilizes three of the units (3, 8, and 10) from future expansion and severely limits two others (1 and 11). The other six, all original units, can expand in the same way that was contemplated in the original approval. Each unit already has two off-street parking places. In addition, there is dedicated guest parking for the Trustee Houses adjacent to the property. No request for variances is being made. E. Design Standards. The design of the proposed development is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. Response. The Trustee Houses parcel is on the city's historic inventory. As such, and development on the parcel is subject to review by the Historic Preservation committee and pOSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING conformance with their guidelines in effect at the time of the review. As you are aware, these guidelines cover all aspects of a proposed development including site planning, massing, and materials. F. Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. Response. All of these features currently exist as part of the overall Meadows complex. To the extent that an individual building permit requests requires Growth Management mitigation with respect to any of these elements, it will be dealt with at the time of such permit submittal. G. Engineering Design Standards. There has been an accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the project to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29 — Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan. Response. This proposal does not require addressing of these standards. However, as individual building permit requests are put forward they will address these standards as they exist at the time of the building permit. H. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities as necessary to serve the project. Response. No upgrades to public facilities are required as part of this amendment request. In addition, it is unlikely that any of the modest expansions that may come about in future will lead to any required upgrades. I. Access and Circulation. The proposed development shall have perpetual and unobstructed legal vehicular access to a public way. Response. The Meadows and the Trustee Homes currently meet this standard. No change is proposed. Any future expansion of an individual will also not change the current access patterns. In summary, we feel this is a very simple and reasonable request. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Bill Voss and Associates Architecture and Planning, P.C. 0 M Project: Applicant: Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing Number of residential units: Existing Number of bedrooms: Existing Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Proposed: Proposed: Proposed: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On -Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed: Buildings Existing non -conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: Agreement to Pay Application Fees and Property Trustee Houses at the Aspen Phone No.: 319-2592 Owner ("I"): KAnnrinwc HnA email: john@johnsarpa.com Address of Billing 501 East Hyman Ave. Property: Lot 5 Aspen Meadows SPA Address: Suite 201 (Subject of (send bills here)Aspen, Colorado 81611 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. i understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. 4,550.0 latfeefor PUD Amend. . fee for $. flat fee for $. flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs Involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient Information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless Invoices are paid in full. The city and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no -payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $, 4,550.00 deposit for 14 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ 0.00 deposit for 0 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property O - Chris Bendon _ Community Development Director Name: 0 hn Sarpa City use: Title: HOA President Fees Due: $Received $ January, 2016 City of Apen 1 130 S. Galena St. 1 (970) 920 SOSO Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Owner ("I"): Name: Trustees Houses at the Aspen Meadows HOA Email: john@johnsarpa.com Phone No.: (970) 379-2595 Address of Lot 5 aspen Meadows SPA Property: 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, 91, 101, and 111 Meadows Trustee Road (subject of Aspen, CO 81611 application) p I certify as follows: (pick one) ❑ This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. ❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. ® This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. t understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understa d that this document is a public document. Owner signature: date: of Owner printed na : �1i A r or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) APPLICANT: Name: Address: Phone #: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Special Review ❑ ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Residential Design Variance ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes condominiumization) ❑ Lot Split ❑ Lot Line Adjustment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 'ROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) ❑ Temporary Use ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ❑ Other: Have you attached the following? FEES DuE: $ ❑ Pre -Application Conference Summary ❑ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ❑ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ❑ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-1) model. Your pre -application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-1) model. n340937 01/24/92 14;13 Rec $400_00 99 667 PO 756: -i{ Silvia Davis, Pitkln Cnty Cler DPG $.OD requirements for form and content above set forth. Any such substitution sball besubject to the prior approval of the City Attorney in his determination. i - -? no Final Plat depicts a trail tasentent across the Physics Property from Gillespie .„ street to the race track trail on.Lot 1. Physics and the City agree [hat ibis trail easement is not to be paved,. Physics is granting this easement but has no i financial obligation of any kind for the trait or any related work. S D. i it i s 4 1 e; IAT 4 - CONSERVATION T.ANU_: r Lot 4 Is to be sold by Savanah to the City of Aspen for the purpose of open space, Lot !`= 4 shall be zoned Wildlife Proservation (NP). It is the Intention of this woe district that = this Property remain open with a Imil system and appropriate bridge connections to the Rio Grande Trail, Neither the Consortium nor any of its individual members thereof shall have any responsibility whatsoever for ftee struction,Installmlonormaintenance of any trail or other recreational facilities to be incorporated into Lot 4. Exact trail locations must W approved by fa Planning Director giving priority to those alignments ' Which mintmize damage or disruption to existing vegetation and landscape and which . subordinate grade considerations and, thus, minimize swllchbacks, to preservation of existing topography. i 1. silo Improvements . (a) U011tio The Final Plat shows utility line easements as existing and proposed for elcet ed, gas, storm and sanitary sewer, and water. Ipj USTRUSTRE'HOUSES AT -THE ASPEN h1iI D ,=i ' Lot 5 is Savanah's Property and is zoned RMF according to and as shown. on the Plat, ExistingdevelopmenlonLotSconsistsorUigllthustaefiutscsracbdfapproximatoty' . 1750 squtirb test; consisting of three bedrooms and two baths. bevelopment has been approved for an expansion and rea0vallon of the existing trustee houses:to crease otght-1 ' itisee•tKdreorll n sets of2;500 sgtlare ipet of rAR ea¢In In addition three now tmsfee houses shall be devote* on Lot 5, ono on the South end of the exisiing units and two on the North end of the existing units. Each new unit will be 2,500 square feet of PAR .with three bedrooms. Total bulld-out on Lot shall consist oflel9Pen uhrlbi with thirty-, E-_ three bedroomsandZ2 500sq tfogofFAR3VxcltdingcaiponsIuptoSWsquaralixnt 1por dwellipg in fF&#ARs and the definillohs ihelcofSor;Itisnsishgg raiiQhow Rut "'I w [4vsessha�lldiFii_f81ttas-sdfonbanddefiocdlatha-Asgfiillah�ilsplteBulhl�on---v reo aabf3ude10;fS)lrholwithstzndingandshaltpptylvPiorrotlessxhari'.;holhrcey;ar 11440937 01/24/92 16:13 Rec $400.00 DI: 667 PG 757 S114za ➢a4iv,-Pttkrn Cnty Clerk, Doc $.00 ` ,pcdod 110904 ' v3h�gJun�.i 'f�l, apy's bsequ ntlyedop led cduetion'n or cfianger ' 1.10 she deFindt[os or ea)chladon�ofpARs,� "a three new residences have received an allotment under the GMQS and have received variations for setbacks, height and open - space, as noted on the Plat and asgm ribed below. 1, D 111011onai Reouimmems aed Yadallm Therefrom 2thc following dimensional requirements are for the RMP Zone .District; variations in these requirements that have been granted for the development activity, contemplated for Lot 5 are noted: a) Minimum lot size (sq. a.): 6,000 b) Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: `) 3 bedroom unit: 3,630,sq. A, c) Minimum 'lot width: 66 feet . - d) Minimum front yard: i) Principal building: 10 feet It) Accessory bedding: Is feet Mo. A variation from minimum RMP Zone District front yard - setbacks for accessory buildings has been granted by the City to zero tat for Lot 5.) e) Minimum side yard: 5 feet f) Minimum rear yard: t) Principal building: 10 feet 11) Accessory building: 15 feet g) a!a Jmum heghh;r `25 feet 03do. A dimensional height variation for the two northernmost trustee houses has been granted by the City for up to eight feet.) h) Percent of open space required for building site: 35% Y.i 7 u 2. t a ,t 1: 3 lA ( n a. r F i g34o937 01/24/92 1601Z Rec 8400.00 9K 667 PG 730 Silvia Day1s, Pi.tkln (1nty Clerk, Doc 4.00 (1m, Minimum RAIF Zone District open space requirements have been waived by the City for Lot 5 in consideration of the open space olherwlse provided intheSPA development plan.) i)- External PAR(maximum): L•1 j) Internal FAR: no requirem8nt k) off-street parking requimmenit 1 space per bedroom condoillifin urnizallon and Six Munlh jllinim m +ace' Rear' me_nt Pursuant to findings made during the approval process and in accordance with Section 24.7-1007 of the Municipal Code, the City has granted and awarded condominiumizalton approvai for all eleven units contemplated for Lot 5. Condominlumization of the eight existing units is subject to Payment of an affordable booting impact tee lecerding to section 24.7.1007A(1)(e). The tee totals $64,240 and shall bo paid at time of recordation of the condominium plat and declaration for the units on Lot S. The six month minimum..lease requirement for condominium units as contained at Section 24-7-1007 (A)(t)lb)(i) of the Municipal Code has been and hereby is waived as to all the condominium units on Lot 5 as approved by this SPA plan, Sitermorovenro I (a) IAllitles. All telephone, electric and cable lines on the properly servicing the Improvements shall be undergrounded. Ail wales end sanitary sewer lines shall be designed and constructed in aocorchmee with standards of the City and of the ACSD and written easements will be provided if and as required confirming the as-bulit location of each casement. (b) iandscape Improvements. Savanah shalt abide by and substantially conform to the tree removal and landscape plans recorded as part of the Plat in Rook „aq at Paged-, el seq. of the Rceords. The landscape plans depict and describe the nature, extent and location of all plant materials in appropriate rotation to scale, species and size of exisling-Plant material, flower and shrub bed definition, a plant material Schedule with common and bomical ma_mes, sizes and quantities, proposed treatment of all ground surfaces (e,g., paving, turf, gravel, terracing, etc.), decorative water features, retaining walls, fencing, benches, and all other agreed - upon landscape features. Such landscaping shall be completed in a logical sequence commensurate with the staging of improvements asc memplated in the Lot 5 Construction Sciwdule, but in no event later than one year 24 { y k 1 f T y` lW�i ��}i ft j, rfxfc, 5-. r±l �4! - �- . y, '*,• ;rt �YSn irr Y � a s,t 1 r 4 f �' + < ; \ 9 ��•s� ar. s��^7���$7, J"4 , �3�-ta4 .. 4 � "R'�?.4� ��� �f3A. t��IfMY.•�,r.` �AX� (- .. S4K .�f �� 030.0937 01/24I92 lb; i3 f:eo S400. 00 DK 667 P9 759 _ si}via Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clar•R. Doc $.00 r. I after the dale of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the final 1.4:: _ phase of improvements. A is the. mutual understanding of the parties that —�.., Certificates ofOccupaneymay infact issue Mir Improvemomsoven though _ the landscaping improvements related thereto have not yet been compiler - oil, so long as that portion of the financial guaranty provided for in this - Agreement, which covers the estimated cost of such anOnlshed landmit- - -{ - Ing remains available to the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. - All tree replacement shun be on a one-toons caliper inch basis throughout }j the Project as a whole with minimum sire at 1 1/2• callper, - - '1 4. Zip$ _ is j' The Plat depicts all traits dedicated or conveyed to public use and all easements 1Wdng off-stte trails to the project's trail system, including the Iran easement t ' =; between Oro tennis townhouses and restaurant. Written easements shall be ^� i executed and conveyed after trail construction confirming the as -built location of p each easement. A portion of the ball Fasament for the troll from Meadows Road attt t to l.ot 4 crosses f.ot 5, as depleted on the plat. Titan construction on this _ Y -- - Fatement and any other appurtenant recreational facilities and amenities and 1 landscaping is the sole responsibility of the City of Aspen. Neither Savanah nor - -� the Consortium shall have any financial responsibility for any of this work or for the maintenance of any easements. �tttr' [[tree . , 5. Ffnl ciAl Assunurces In order to $=to the consueonce of the site and landscape Improvements In ,. paragraphs 3(a) and 0) above and to guamn!co 100% of the esdmafed cost of ' such improvements, Savanah shall guararfice by irrevocable bond, sight draft or loner of commitment or credit from a financially responsible tender that funds in t the amount of such estimated oosis, arc held by it for the account of City for the construction and installation of the abovedescribed improvements. As a condition tot issuance ofabuild!ng permit for a portion or all of the renovation { and now construction anticipated herein, Savanah and City shall agree on that I popion of the work outlined in Paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b) above reasonably { necessary to complete this wo,k for which a permit is being sought and the mutually agroed upon financial assurances shall be delivered to fhe City prior to _ Issuance of the building permit, All financial assurances given.by Savarah to City, in all events, shall give the City theuncendhional right, upon and following - default by Savanah, notice thereof by the City, end a forty day tight thereafter to - cure, to withdraw funds as necessary and upon demand to partially or fully complete and/or pay for any of such improvements or pay any uncomosted oulsianding bills for work done thereon by any party, with any excess guaranty amount to be applied first.to additional administrative or legal costs associated with any such default and the repair of any deterioration in improvements already 25 p ' s i I 834093'e 01/24/92 16t 13 Rat $400. 00 BK 667 PG 760 Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty ClePk, Doc constructed before the unused remainder (if any) of such guaranty is released fo Savanah. As portions of the required improvements are completed, the Public s' Werkf Directorshall Inspect Them, and upon appmvahand written acceptance, he shall authorize Iha release from the guaranty delivered by Savanah of the agreed estimated cost for that portion of the improvements except that 10% of the actual _ - cost.of she site orlandscapo Improvements shall bo retalned unlit all proposed site or landscape improvements are completed and approved by the Public Works Director. At anydmo and from tlmeao time, Savanah shall it the right to subsittule for ?' "- theformoffinanciat assurance given, so long as such substituting form meets the _ requirements for form and Content above set forth. Any such substitution shall " be subject to the prior approval of City Attorney in his determination. 6. )hllployea Houstnq- wltvimakMdiheCityacknowledga'tNi{therepovalltmand,oxpansionoflheglghN- Irullc0.OtIS45 tjotWt,CreaIe anyranP-Cyceimpa , lsoeauso Iha Ixdroomixmnt in, E4acf/ un t-mmains a1-J'a- savanah shall pay to City an affordable housing mitigation Impact fee for 1,66low Income employees per unit for each of the three new residential units on £.Of5, in an amooat.to be calculated pursuant to those fee guidelines in effect at the time the tea is to be paid. the fee shallbe paid prior to the issuance of the building permit for consmiction of any new residential unit on Lot 5 and shall be paid in proportion to the number of units sought robe permitted. Loth is by Sava" and is zoned RMF according to shown on the Plat. CUR Ily th ,residential development on Lot pproved under this plan is I developmen[ of saved uupp��homa units of theta bit ors and 2,500 squ: ro feet of FAtt each. Total build Gut onlotirslu consist Von units twenty-one bedrooms and } HMO square feet of FAR, excludm rts (up to 500 square feet per dwelling unit). FARs and the definitions 0ierco r the ex tnngg..�d new trustee houses shalt remain as set forth and defined in £.and Use kegutdd In effect as offuno 10, 1991, } not w11h31anding 1 survive for not less than tine Ih - tied next succeeding ;i Luna 19, 1 any subsequently adopted reduction in or chang the definilion of caicu of FARs. The seven new townhomes have received an allot under the "f GMQS and have received variations for height, open space and setba for 1 accessory buildings, all as noted on the Plat and described herein. 26 I Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/O/does/CitylComdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20u se%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http:l/www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/PIanning-and Zoning[Fitle-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.445.110(D) Planned Development Amendments, Minor Amendment Project Review 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements Review by: Staff for complete application City Council for review and approval Public Hearing: Yes, at City Council Neighborhood Outreach: Yes, Staff recommends an enhanced public notice mailing. Planning Fees: Planning Deposit - $4,550 Referral Fees: none. Total Deposit: $4,560 (for 14 hours, additional planning hours over deposit amount are billed at a rate of $325/hour) To apply, submit the following information: Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Pre -application Conference Summary (this document). A copy of the approved PD documents for the Aspen Meadows Townhomes. ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. HOA Compliance form (Attached) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. / Written responses to all review criteria. /An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: ❑ 10 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. Number of copies correlates to referral agencies and review boards. ❑ Total deposit for review of the application. ❑ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. c3 s 40 RVA —04 Ku yL _ - -A Lir; L i Y i 1p 27, -- �-y d + # r•Yr c Y % L ` — . ` '' JF 1 w $ j Y 41t Id f� ' ti _ . �r'% 45 Y r p . } , - ti r`}ice . •a, AV" Jor 4 L�. {' ~ f#' -13 FL r�� a • t q y I p T - 5 + :r FY < m LU c 0 v 00 O< W J J - r � W r- - LL a c z j ^°fs : ��! z O� w iWU' O tnFW- z � pU ` W 0-4 F- W z < o) << W .0 W W 3cc�OEWw (I- uj U ::) 0z W< zz W- a-< -i zz=1:>W1: ZU U o2<cn 2 __i O N - <n N wQ�- �O< U') ZDO l� <�W O O- W m ofz<M- LL 0 wnUzOF- =-WZ3z W2 ®� ® CA Q U �V) W-w< OW m H on H z TWO p3tl> now ZSW O Z W 00 U) N U WpJ 000W > to F-< F- W Z=-YF--CnJ O U - cn LL OU> -.z Z m<F-tn -JtnU r7 W O LLJO <LL>•F- Uz 7 of F-UO3dJLL < t�-1 abs F- Lr) W > W F-U WW O U' <- cn:)ZO Z N Z F- - 30 m 1-y Q O Ol - < <ODLL h-Cn O WF-LLCW,)wcn�� F- Z n U OLL < Z p zZF-F-pO Ocn �► Z # ZUW v3 LL 0OW-O-o= p- W LU < O W OIL V) > zUpJZOm <> � W J or cn Z XOZ - O 0 0- F- I< >W W- LU W LU < 0 i J O 2-U W Z CD m W>F-p 7-0 cn < (� U 0 � -< U)Y o>- • O W ^ZWomv> m cn < Q 2 to a_ W F- I I- U) Z a. Z- O-- z 0 W W O G� F -tn ZO-O cn-- E- W O 3Joao 3 W(n J LU = U >LL O«O 2Ucn > U) O JZW>-O LL n- 2>-WzmWJ :� a cn(n m m W pY_ ^mU OWW W < U)cy-O >w <3 O W Cl- W Z a m11 zzOr`• S J W <LL�LLmm og , O 3 O Z F"s < Om --LL0 >-F-w W LL S• cap CDOO SG Wm co CL v7 W LLJ CI_ \ W U to < O J m O F- <CZZW cn= �\ W p p -I -tp W >• � ♦- .. S - W cn O n F- w - O �� � p O (n U) �i - 3 z F- < - - a_ F- < U m >- Z Z - W 0) r- :]-- 00 W U to W W m • O cr m CD O > F- W d p f- cn > � Lu z / Q Q L L1 < O < Ul - + 2 Z < 2 W S > Lo < Z N / �-' � ~' N - tn Z Z ON D O E W Z W� U /// F- W 03 i F- D N W W O� / < 3 F- < W W < F-O •m WZ - to ® pp O S U � < J Z i ����������� W0 -JUJU -r-o W Z �a cn -MLLZU •U) Wcn U � �O z a. W W . . . . . . . . . . . 2- NLL •O tnLLt0 F- 0 WU' >Od3op �< < �/ > P4 J -i LLZ Ww0) O F-ZWU OpWW O� .O / CO O� \X/ 2 W W LLWLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Z- cntr -p- z 0 <- Wcn= F-S J /\ F- <ncntntntncntntncncncn WO -<>•J J W W F-lYp�F-cnpa F •�i••••• Z Zp u7 Q O J Z z X o- O W m w (n W O U) cn M -1 = z W � r• $ F- -< C) `a 3 O O O O O-aOM- OO�mr�l� V)< > > z <w < p0WLLO0ZO<XLL `�� ': (� 000 ZYmO . / m F- E 2 m �Y r" 0i N 0 a0 'V' ro r7 M) o < m F- � p < F- m F- m F� \ � < o z < > o o J Wt(p��V-LnLnUM11Vr)�P�') w_j wo�� wwD w (n zwLLCn��fnw : WZ da-o eO �� s� m m 0 m J U U < J SO a.U1<>- CLWz F- z `U>-WWWWWW • �y wo U) U z W U p < U co F-U O a.F- O< O-WS-02U� L > > LU > J p - < O- mWW- m t_ o - rw (o>F-U Z< i (np OW < W L� ♦--N r)v U)to r�000)-- ` - a.ptYZ a-pU W OCR Zcn tn< * � DW LL O Z 0 - W O w m m F- F- U1Z -a_D crW +- < WOZ<F-<z�w q �WOM�•` � mi- O>- - m PQ \ _' W z z FW- z z w wF-f-F-f-F-F-f-F-F-F-F- F-Q �FF---a_i "-NO < W �' zp�OWWF_F_)_F_ ,t•%+�•'•e�7' ��1 :~D >-zfW- F<- w < w < w - J mzZZzzzzZzzz 00 =D<O =<W J J dppm2dmW �. Ai w_ F-D< Z / LL O 0 LL 2 LL 3 0 J W -1< F-OEU F-Sa. U) LU wUwwm>SZ LL S- -OF- O J O� �- WJWcncntnUa.m F-< U) `LLmnww<03F- W W 3 < <0 CA- / �� ��� /Ln O U C; p p \ O ❑®�® ®U U® W- �� N \ X J -E n pW e 0 1 3 0 z < O W - OLUo cn m <� W S f- .L O I 0 0W� 6Z bd N \ m J m p \ z - < m N z LLJ M �� \ 9� o � o �,6\ / z f �� S W V 2 W F- 0O U / cmnw <D, 3 S w / / �' / O F-a 00) m 1 U CD r- / N \ LN3W3Sb3 N�1bM / cto N LU Ln a7 ° 03 57 c, �� / \ \p .aA O o. 5�°�� �� ' 66 CN 3 - — A ��/ 9� OZ ��M�S \ / _ .--R0. Sb°60 N - _ 90'bL M.6 .b0° 10 N ,/ �/`0 dp �HOJ 9� Z6 �31 �j6 \\ I l r' �l �'� /�i �� ° // \6Lli h o FZ N ` .,0>_ °' _b of a_ o dq/� Sb J U U loo�� ./ �� . �° �s c . z V S W u) - - - - - - - -- -- - ` ��' � z < S o. °fit p`t DECK °` / �• - SS 9- M- z=- 1N3W�S d� I a103�3 01 �o < - _ I £6 3.�Z.OS°10 S ZS S, A.77 _ y z m IbZ 2 - CL 0. o c) t O �bo1 sB' 6 - N M v t0 W — 0 - O Z S/ } 6 N / t - - - - - - - - 1� CD n t0 N p o `' ' o ^�\ k �03G < o Q ` O �� 05 s2 a / 4) J�O co U z pLgMTER Z / w o a m �\ s. ° V, t �: aah U F 2l �0 Q Co �� o o`) N ��o �d S/ / 'S O� z N o F. �0 N z �In p1 O tt 3. 8 < N p h'� 9' U d ° 00 - �' v � C> CD Ln a z m ° a 22.5 / �m F tea. �a z ti. o �, v CL � 'N z v< i D _ o b — p ri < O o z O N v z ^ U _ v _ J W a / 61 // 0 8 �b J r7 P Z a. � C _ - -- M z X 0� oN w ^ U v F - p �-- rp [ ; z O o to ° L� �' 6 W • cN t N s /e \ Z o, _ _' U - _ � W � cn ^ ^ -fib xcp F2 z o / �`_' gS° bl sb F •6/ z m co n z m ` ^ a31NVld 22. i 18 50 0 / / Z / of < S Q l A/ . 6/ £ 6 j O o ~ z a / / / O l o N t'b O £'ZZ / d M / o\� WW - Z Z ��� �_ -� a to o ^ F tt h o ° ^ d `zz Q In V ❑ / ~ F- /5� �� N i cWn ,£ --� W _ - 0 LU Pj� LU 5 / m ® S � / a. LU e p / U 2� \G / 5 LU Lli �0 SO'SS2 M.bS.LO°00 S o, u, N C, z 0 / t0 � 1-4 - (N 3 f� �0 N N <nz o _ O z o ^ °' F-ZLU > LLJ (I a-z ^ �4wp V) m « 2/ < O rn LL Z W O 0 F- to -m U CD M�1 I J F- Z W <UW 2 (D < F- r_ W< W JW)_Z2LL > < 2 ZW • <lL} Z< tr<W OW W 2EmWtn Ur- Oz Z F- f W W W Z Z 2 S L-WO F i=>WZ O F-WU 2 U- ZOO-• 30W2- v~ir-ZF�3 D< Z O z n i J- U O W tL a 0 LW- F O nF-m« }-U UF- SWF--tn 3F-LL<U_ < WJ-F- JZO4.F-W OOStntL WLLJ <UO= O o u_ W Z OJ W Cr ZHLL U�> LL >•OF-O0 O Z U U F-<tnWWO C�Zn W<> 20 0p to o�ccnn}LL z cyZ2Z 0o-<F-o U W LL Utn Z=F- < < 7 O O < co0azvc WZ LL >_ UOtr�tn�F--W> -WW OULL<WWD Z«m}Ucn