HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.710 S Galena St.0008.2004.ASLU
~. .~.
'"
City of Aspen Community Development Dept.
CASE NUMBER
0008.2004.ASL U
PARCELID#
2737-182-96-003
CASE NAME
ANDERMAN 8040 GREENLINE
--r-M-E..lr6;KINS 71 0, )' .Gc~''t1
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
JAMES LINDT
CASE DESCRIPTION
GMQS, ESA, RES DESIGN STANDARDS
REPRESENTATIVE
V ANN & ASSOC 925-6958
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 04/20/04
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
APPROVED W/CONDITIONS Reso. 12-2004
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
4/20/04
BY
D DRISCOLL
r'1
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section
26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights",
of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific
development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein.
The effective date of this Order shall also be the .initiation date of a three-year vested
property right. The vested property right shall ~xpire on the day after the third
anniversary of the effective. date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved
pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a
revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of
vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect,.. excluding any
growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject
to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
Aspen Land Fund LLC c/o CW A Development LLC, 302 E. Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number
Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
8040 Greenline Approval and Variances from Secondary Mass, Building Orientation, and Build-
to-lines Residential Design Standards to construct a new single-family residence
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan
Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 12, Series of2004, 4/20/04
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
May 1, 2004
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
May 2, 2007
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration
and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code.)
Issued this 1 sl day of May, 2004, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director.
Jul" Ann Woods, Community Development Director
r\
,.. . ..1
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Notice is hereby given to the general public ofthe approval of a site specific development
plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the
City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the
following described property: Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision, by resolution of the
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission numbered 12, Series of 2004. The Applicant
received 8040 Greenline Review approval and Secondary Mass, Building Orientation,
and Build-to-lines variances from the residential design standards to construct a new
single-family residence. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the City of
Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colonido (970) 920-
5090.
s/ City of Aspen
Publi~h in The Aspen Times on May 1, 2004
RESOLUTION NO. 12
(SERIES OF 2004)
A RESOLUTIQNQF Tm: CITY QJ.fASR~N:p~ANNJN(;'.Al,!I?~.~:):N:!N~.
COMMISSION APPROVING AN 1) 8040 GREENLINE REVlEW ANQ2)
APPROVING VARIANCES FROMT.:H...E BUILDING ORIENT.A. TI.ON. ,.B..UIL....D. -..T..O
LINES, AND SECONDARY MAS~BE~jnENiiA:LDESiGN'S'TANj)AR[)~ F'QJlA
SINGLE-FAMILY.RESIQEN~EQN'bQt'1:'QtT~'t'ifpi::E'W'O()D'S'".>
SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2737-182-96-003
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from Aspen Land Fund LLC, represented by Vann Associates, LLC, requestjngapproval of
an 8040 Greenline Review and variallc~s from the J:311ildil1g Orientation, Build-to lines, and
Secondary Mass Residential Design Standards to constl'llct a 11~\V ~ingle-family residence on
Lot 4, of the Tipple Woods Subdivision; and,
WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 3,792 square feet and is located
in the ,Lodge/Tourist Residential Zone District; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed development is located at an elevation gf approximately
7,990 feet above sea level and is subject to 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to Land Use
Code Section 26.435.020, EnviroYlmentally Sensitive Areas; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve development at or
within 150 feet below the 8040 Greenline inconform..an... ce with. ..t. h..e.. revie..w.. criteria
.." .... .. .... .. ...." ,'" ,....,_-_~........< _:' .'...,......>::....:'.:'... .0' :...... .:' .. .....".. "
established in Land Use Code SectioIl26A35.039(C), 8040 Greenline Review; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve Variances from the
Residential Design Standards wh~n the variance request is consolidated with another land
use request in which the Commission has .the revi~w allt110rity; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has reviewed the proposal
and recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve with conditions, the
8040 Greenline Review and variance. requests from the Building Orientation, Build-to lines,
and Secondary Mass Residential Design Standards; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 20, 2004, the Planning
and Zoning Commission approved with conditions, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, the
Anderman 8040 Oreenline Review and residentialg~sign standard variance requests to
construct a new single-family residence on Lot 4, of the Tipple Woods Subdivision; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development
proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the
development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen
Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN
PLANNING AND ZONING COlVI1VQ~~lQN~~J2!!...~,~:
Section 1
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
Andeftllan 8040 Greenline Revievv to construct anew single-family residence on Lot 4, of the
Tipple Woods Subdivision is hereby approved with the following conditions:
1. The Applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping plan for approval by the City
of Aspen Parks Department at the time of building permit submittal. The
landscaping plan shall indicate that the Applicant shall re-vegetate any
disturbed areas that are notwithil1 thy footprint of the proposed residence
(footprint includes patio) to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Parks
Department prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy. '
2. The Applicant shall place a vegetation protection fence around. the driplines
of any trees to be saved and shall havy the City Forester or his designee
inspect the fencing prior to commellcing construction activities. No
excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction equipment,
construction backfill, foot or vehicular traffic shall be allowed within the
driplines of trees to be saved.
3. The building permit application shall include the follQwil1g:
a. A copy of the final P&Z Resolution.
b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building
permit set.
c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated
Sanitation District.
d. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and
any approval from the Parks Department Director for mitigation of
removed trees, if applicable.
e. The building plans shall demonstrate. an adequate fire suppression
system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshal will be installed. A fire
alarm system meeting the, requirements of the Fire Marshal may also
need to be installed at the discretionofthe Aspen Fire Marshal.
f. A constructi()nll1:"lllagement plan that details the proposed method
and means by which the site will be accessed with ex<;:avatiol1(lnd
grading equipment during construction. This plan shall also detail the
proposed construction parking, which shall demonstrate that except
for essential trade trucks, no other personal trucks are to be parked in
the area around the site. The City encourages that site workers be
shuttled in from the ail'Port parking area.
g. A Geotechni<::al Report and study performed by a Colorado licensed
Civil Engineer demonstrating how the required excavation of the site
may be performed without ciamaging adjacent structures and/or
properties. This study shall include a detailed de?cription of the slope
stabilization and erosion control techniques to be used during
construction. If the applicant utilizes soil pins to stabilize excavation
cuts, the applicant shall be required to provide a financial assurance in
an amount to be determined. by the Community Development
Engineer. The City Engineering Department strongly prefers that the
Applicants use soil hardening techniques rather' than soil pins to
stabilize the excavation cuts.
h. A drainage and erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed
Civil Engineer, which maintains sediment and debris on-site during
and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required, a soil
percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. Silt
fencing shall be incmporated into the erosion control plan. A 2-year
storm frequency should be us~d ill ci~signing any drainage
improvements. The drainage plan shall demonstrate that there will. be
no increase in the site's historic runoff as a reslllt ()fthe newre~idence.
1. A letter from the primary contractor to the Community Development
Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and
understood.
4. The Applicant shall provide a new, individual sanitary sewer service line to serve
the proposed residence. The new service .lil1e shall..lll~et the, standards of the
Aspen Consolidated SaJJ.itationPistrict. ,~ClJ1i!ary sewer service is contingent
upon compliance with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's rules,
regulations, and specifications.
5. The Applicant shall install a ne\V \Vatyrs~ryic.~.El1yt()!hy}y~!4,yJ:1;S~t.1l.~tllle.e.!stge
requirements of the City of Aspen Water Department and provides sufficient
water pressure to serve the residential water needs and the fire sprinkler system
that is required by the Fire Marshal. If the water lil1e is t() lJe shared .\Vith other
residences, the Applicant shall sign a common water service line agreement and
the residence shall have an illcliyiclll;;tl\V"l!yrlllytyr;I~eApplicant shallabandon
the existing water service line at the main prior to making a new connection.
6. Prior to issuance of abuilding permit, all tap fees, impacts fees, and building
permit fees shall be, paid. If an alternative agreement to delay payment of the
Water Tap and/or Parks Impact fees pertaining to this propertyis finalized as part
of the Residences at Little Nell Final PUD project, those fees shall be payable
according to such agreement.
7. The Applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Collstruction activity is
limited to the hours between7a.m.and 7p.m, Monday through Saturday.
8. All uses and construction \Vill comply with the City of Aspen Water System
Standards and with Title 25, Cllldapplicable portions of Title 8 (Water
Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as
they pertain to, utilities.
9. All exterior lighting shall meet the City of Aspen Lighting Code requirements
set forth in Land Use C()de S~cti()11:2(5.57?150, as may be amended from time
to time.
1 O. Two (2) off-street parking spaces designated for use by the residence on Lot 4
of the Tipple Woods Subdivision shall bemaintail1ed 011 the adjacent Tipple
Woods Lodge property or a City approved parking alternative shall be enacted
in conjunction with the construction of the Residences at Little Nell or the
Tippler Townhomesthat will provide two (2) off-street parking spaces within
the City that are to be designated for use by the single-family residence on Lot
4, of the Tipple Woods Subdivision.
Section 2:
Pursuant to Land Use Cod~ Sectio.n 26.470.070, GMQS Exemptions, a GMQS exemption is
herby granted for a replacement residence provided that the Applicant pays the applicable
affordable housing impact fee prior to building permit issuance pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 26.470.070(B)(1)(d).
Section 3:
Pursuant to Land Use Cod.e $ecti()l1. :2(5.410, Residential Design Standards, the requested
variances from the Building Orientation, Build-to lines, and Secondary Mass Residential
Design Standards are hereby approved.
Section 4:
The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan
vested for a period ofthree (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order.
No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary
to obtain a development order,as set forth in thi$ resollJ.tion, the City Clerk shall cause to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the
City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific
development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice
shall be substantially in the following form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific
development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, pursuant to the
Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised
Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 4, of the Tipple
Woods Subdivision, by Resolution No. 12, Series of 2004, of the Aspen Planning
and Zoning Commission.
Section 5:
All material representations and commitments" mad~.. by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incOl'porated
in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth
herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 6:
This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior
ordinances.
Section 7:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or, portion of this resolution is for any .
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall
be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 20th day
of April, 2004.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PLANNING AND ZQNING COMMISSION:
City Attorney
Jasmine Tygre, Chair
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
f'
~
',Of""'-,';;, ..
....... .
FROM:
James Lindt, Planner Q L
Arptflovd 4-~O
Wi odJdl Co wlJ,'oL
t--v ~q\\/Lr4tL'\ L-
toC\lrk\~~ SjQQC<e5
O~V'~c!J e~c~~+ ~(~rojU~v~
Anderman 8040 Greenline Review and Residenti;tJ j)esign Stardard 4S e. op f-, \~ {Jal/C't t
Variances - Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision - Public Hearing
MEMORANDUM
THRU:
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Joyce Allgaie;!~~munity Development Deputy Director
TO:
RE:
DATE:
April 20, 2004
PROPOSED LAND USE:
Single-Family Residence
ApPLICANT:
Aspen Land Fund, LLC
REPRESENTATIVE:
Vann Associates, LLC
LOCATION:
Lot 4, Tipple Woods Subdivision
710 S. Galena St.
ZONING:
Lodge/ Tourist Residential (L/TR)
CURRENT LAND USE:
Single-Family Residence
FAR:
Allowable FAR (with slope
reduction considered)= 1,966
Square Feet
SUMMARY:
The Applicant is requesting 8040 Greenline Review
approval and approval of several variances from the
Residential Design Standards to construct a single-
family residence on Lot 4, of the Tipple Woods
Subdivision. This is a one-step review before the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
LOT SIZE:
3,792 Square Feet
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with Conditions
-.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas - 8040 GreenlineReview: Following the
receipt of a recommendation from the Community Development Department, the Planning
I
""
and Zoning Commission shall, by resolution approve, approve with conditions, or deny a
development application for development in environmentally sensitive areas (ESA's include
8040 Greenline Review, Stream Margin Review, Hallam Lake Bluff Review).
Variances from the Residential Design~tCl~4(1r~s: .~9119~ilJ.~ the receipt of a
recommendation from the Community Development Department, and after hearing and
considering public comment, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall by resolution
approve, approve with conditions, or deny a variance request from the Residential Design
Standards.
BACKGROUND:
Aspen Land Fund, LLC ("Applicant"), represented by Vann Associates, LLC, is requesting
approval of an 8040 GreenlineJ{evi~\y ~nd..~~Y~t~lY~t!egS~~< fE2,m. m:~I~~i~~lJ.ti~!g~si~lJ.
standards to construct a 1,966 square foot singh~-family residence on Lot 4, of the Tipple
Woods Subdivision. Lot 4, of the Tipple Woods SubdivisionislQc::~ted.n~ar tl1ebase of
Aspen Mountain off of South Galena Street ~.nd is currently improved with a small, one
bedroom single-family residence of about 800 square feet that is to be demolished to make
way for the proposed residence. Two (2) parking spaces designated for the use of the
subject property are located in the Tipple Lodge parkillg lot to the northeast of the sllbject
'property. The property owners take a tram up to the existing residence.
Land Use Code Section 26.435.030, 8040 Greenline Review applies to all development
located at or above 8040 feet above m~~ns~a 1~,,~1(tJ;1e 8040 (}re~n.JilJ.e) in theCity of
Aspen, and all development within one hundredJifty (150) feet below the 8040 Greenline.
Thus, because the base elevation of this property is located at approximately 7,990 feet
above sea level, the proposed single-family residence is subject to 8040 Greenline Review.
The Applicant is also requesting variances from the following Residential Design Standards
(Please see Exhibit "B" for descriptions of the specific standards):
1. Building Orientation
2. Build-to-lines
3. Secondary Mass
STAFF COMMENTS:
8040 Greenline Review
The majority of the proposed residence is to be recessed into the hillside bec(iuse almost t\vo-
thirds of the subject property contains severe slopes over 30%. The Applicant has sited the
proposed residence in almost an identical footprint to that of the existing dwelling in part to
minimize disturbance on the lot dlle to. the sevet~..slopes, and in part because of the limited
area that exists within the r~quired setbacks to develop. Thus, Staff believes that the
Applicant has' appropriately sited the proposed structure and has proposed a condition of
approval requiring the Applicant to re-vegetate any areas disturbed during the construction
process with a native seed mix to be approved by the City of Aspen Parks Department prior to
obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy.
2
,.~...., "
1"':1\
Staff also agrees with the Applicant's contention that the proposed residence will not be
highly visible from Galena Street, the core of town, or from Aspen Mountain given that there
is 'significant development encircling the subject site. Moreover, the proposed residence is
allowed a relatively small FAR due to the slope reduction that is to be imposed on the site and
the height of the proposed residence would be slightly less than the twenty-five (25) feet that
is allowed in the LlTR. Zone pi strict.
In reviewing the technical aspects of the proposal, the site has been deemed to be stable for
development purposes. According to reports prepared by the Applicant's Engineer, the site
appears to be stable enough to handle the proposed development as long as certain engineering
controls are instituted during construction. These controls, incllld~ .excavationn~tllinage and
the need to maintain positive grading away from the structure for site dminage pmposes.
, That being the case, Staff has proposed a conditi()n of approval that requires the Applicant to
submit a detailed site drainage plan for review by the Community Development Engineer as
part of the building permit application. The drainage plan shall demonstrate that there will be
no increase in the site's historic rlll1()fLll~ lllr~~'llltQf!l1~ proposal. Additionally, Staff has
proposed a condition, that requires the Applicant to submit a cOll~tfll~tiol1mlll1agement plan
detailing the method of accessing the site with excavationalld grading equipment, as well as,
the excavation retainage methods to be used dlll'ing construction. The construction
management plan shall also be submitted as part of the building permit submittal. .
RESIDENTIAL DE~IG:N SJ AN-QAR-QYAR!AN~~~;"
Building Orientation Yariance:
,The Building Orientation ResidenHaCDeslgn'Standaid (please see Exhibit "B" for a
description of the standard) requires any new residence within the City of Aspen to be
constructed with the frol1t fa9ade parallel to the street. The subject site does not front a street
and does not even contain a driyeway. Therefore, Staff does not believe that this residential
, desigp standard is applicable to this site ill thllt the st<:mdCll'clWllS ~l111(:!ecl to adclyess,the
relationship between residences and the ~ty~et ill \Vl1i9hthey front. Nonetheless, the Applicant
has proposed to orient the stfllctu.re, to th~ ll():tj:h~~~t, which addresses the tram (means of
access to the residence). Therefore, Staff feels that site...specific constraints exist that would
warrant a variance from the B'uilding Orientation Standard.
Build-to lines Vari~..s~:,.. "',',,', ,',.... ....,...,.",..< .", ..'"
The Build-to lines Residential Design Standar2C(pleaseEXhibif"B" for a description of the
standard) requires that any new residence on a lot of 15,000 square feet or less be required to
have sixty (60) percent of its front fa9ade within five (5) feet of the required front yard
setback. As was the case with the building orientation standard, Staff does not feel that this
standard is applicable given that this standard is also intendecl. to ...llcldre~~.. the. x~l11tiQl1ship
between a residence and the street. Moreover, a substantial amount of excavation and
disturbance would be r~quired if the proposed residence were to be designed to meet this
standard due to the~~Yel'eslopes that exist near the front yard setback. Therefore, Staff also
feels that this variance request is necessary due to the site-specific constraints that this site
presents.
3
....
r1j'a
Secondary Mass Variance:
The Secondary' Mass Standarc1(please see Exhibit "Bl" for a description of the standard)
requires that all new residences locate at least 10% ()Ltl1.yirsquare footage above grade in a
mass that is completely detached from the principal building, or linked to it by a subordinate
connecting element. Staff feels that the sec()l1d.ary mass variance request is also necessary due
to the severe slopes that exist and the irregular shape of the lot. Once again, if the proposed
residence were to, be", designed to meet this design standard, Staff believes that more
disturbance would result given that the majority of the buildable area within the required
setbacks is over a thirty (30) percent slope.
Referral Comments:
The proposal was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC) to discuss the technical
considerations presented by the proposal. The Fire Marshal requested that an adequate fire
sprinkler system be installed in the proposed residence. Additionally, the Water Department
has requested that the water line be upgraded to provide adequate water pressure for the fire
sprinkler system to be installed. In(lwl(ltyd.ill;:lJ1~r; the Aspen Sanitati()n Districtl1.11s required
that the Applicant provide an individual sanitClfY sewer.service line to the structure in place of
the current sanitary service line that serves several other single-family residences as well.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recol1lm~119jng that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve with
conditions the proposed 8040 GreenlineReyi~w request, finding that the ESA review
standards have beel1Illet by the proposal. Staff is also recoIlll1len4!l1g that the Planning
and Zoning Commission approve the proposed variances from the 'Buil4ing Orientation,
Build-to lines, and Secondary Mass Residential Design Standards due to the site-specific
constraints that exist.
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS (ALL MOTIONS ARE MADE IN THEAFFIRMATIVE):
"I move to approve Resolution No~, Series of, 2004, approving with conditions, the
Anderman 8040 Greenline Revie\V angR<3sicl<3milll I)~sign Standard Variances for Building
Orientation, Build-to lines, and Secondary Mass to construct a replacement single-family
residence on Lot 4, of the Tipple Woods Subdivision."
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- 8040 Greenline Reviy\V.c:rit<3r.ill.l1I,ldStaJfFil1,gings
Exhibit B -- Design Standards Variance Review Criteria and Staff Filldings
Exhibit C -- Development Application
Exhibit D -- Referral Comments
4
~UUlUJI1LlUnlnlll?J1~:~ ;92.,
R 26.00 0 0.00
RESOLUTION NO. 12
(SERIES OF 2004)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI'fYOF'A~:p~~.:p~~~!~~.ANP.~()~!N(;
COMMISSION APPROVIN9 AN,!) 8040 GREENLlNEMV!:i!:W.ANI> 2)
APPROVING VARIANCES ~QMr!J:~.~"Il!~gIN9()~:L'ff1\.!!()~,BUILI)- TO
LINES, AND SECONDi\R-Y lVIAS~M~J'Q]3~'f!~:Q~~!~N~!~~S~()R A
SINGLE..FAlVIIL YRESIPENCE QN ~OT 4, OF THE TIPPLE WOODS'
SUBDIVISION, CrIYOFASPEN;'piiKIN COUNTY, COLORADO.
Parcel No. 2737-182-96-003
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from Aspen Land Fund LLC, represented by Vann Associates, LLC, requesting approval of
an 8040 Greenline Revi~\V @d Y:iriill}S;~.~frgm!AeI3lJ.ilg1tlg Orientation, Build-to lines, and
Secondary Mass Residential Design Standards to construct a n~w$ingle-family residence on
Lot 4, of the Tipple Woods Subdivision; and,
/ WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 3,792 square feet and is located
in the Lodge/Tourist Residential Zone District; and,
WHEREA~, the proposed development is locat~d at @~leY:itiol1.of approximately
7,990 feet above' sea level and is subject to 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to Land Use
Code Section 26.435.020, Environmenfally Sensitive Areas; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve development at or
within 150 feet below the 8040 Greenline in confo1'1llal1ce \yithtl1.~ l'eview criteria
established in Land Use Code Section 26.435.030(C), 8040 Greenline Review; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve variances from the
Residential Design Standard~ whell th~, y:lJi:i!lc,2}equest is consolidated with another ,land
use request in which the Commission has the revi~w:illthority; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has reviewed the proposal
and recommended that 'the Planning and Zoning Commission approve with',conditions, the
8040 Greenline Review and variance requests from the Building Orientation, Build-to lines,
and Secondary Mass Residential Design Standards; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 20, 2004, the Planning
and Zoning Commission approved with conditions, by a four to zero (4-0) vote, the,
Anderman 8040 . Greenlin~R~yie\V@q.x~~~qSl1g~l.~~~ign standard variance requests to
construct a new single-family residence on Lot 4, oft~e Tipple Woods Subdivision; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Corm'nission finds that the development
proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and tJ:1at the, approval of the
development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen
Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
111\ .111111111\ II J 1IIIidl UII :;~;~~;~~9 z.,
SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 26.00 0 0.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT" RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows:
Section 1
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth ill TiHe.2(j or!h~l~.spen Municipal Code, the
Anderman 8040 Greenline Review to construct a new single-family residence on Lot 4, of the
Tipple Woods Subdivision is hereby approved with the following conditions:
1. The Applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping plan for approval by the City
of Aspen Parks Department at the time of building permit submittal. The
landscaping ,plan shall indicate that the Applicant shall re-vegetate any
disturbed areas that are not within the footprint of the proposed residence
(footprint includes patio) to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Parks
Departnient prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy.
2. The Applicant shallplace a vegetation protectionfenGe around the drip lines of
any trees to be saved andshallhaye th~(:;ity Forester or his designee inspect
the fencing prior to commencing construction activities. No excavation,
storage of mate(rials, storage of construction equipment, construction backfill,
foot or vehicular traffic shall be allowed, \VithID, t.hedriplines of "trees to be
saved.
3. The building permit application shall include the following:
a. A copy of the final P&Z Resolution.
b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building
permit set.
c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated
Sanitation District.
d. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and
any approval from the Parks Department Director for mitigation of
removed trees, if applicable.
e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression
system approved by the Aspen fire Marshal will be, installed. A fire
alarm system meeting the requirements of the Fire Marshal may also
need to be installed at the discretion or!he Aspen Fire Marshal.
f. A construction ma.nagement plan that details the proposed method
and means by which the site will be accessed withexcavfltion.a.n<:l
grading equipment during construction. This plan shall also detail the
proposed construction parking, which shall demonstrate that except
for essential trade trucks, no other personal trucks are to be parked in
the area around the site. The City encourages that site workers be
shuttled in from the ail'port parking area.
g. A Geotechnical Report and study performed by a Colorado licensed
Civil Engineer demonstrating how the required excavation of the site
" ILIIIII III U II U~11l :;~~1~:~ ~g 2.'
SII_VIA DAVI'\1. pITKIN COUNty CO R 26.00 0 0.00
may be performed without damaging adjacent structures and/or
properties. This study shall include a detail~d description of the slope
stabilization and erosion control technigues to be used during
construction. If the applicant utilizes soil pins to stabilize excavation
cuts, the applicant shall be requited to provide a financial assurance in
an amount to be.detel'1llil1ed by the Community Development
Engineer. The City Engineering Department strongly prefers that the
Applicants use soil hardening techniques rather than soil pins to
stabilize the excavation cuts.
h. A drainage and erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed
Civil Engineer, which maintains sediment and debris ol1-sitedllring
and after construction. If a ground recharge system is required, a soil
percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. . Silt
fencing shall be iricol'porated into the erosion control plan. A 2-year
storm frequency should be used in designing any' drainage
improvem.ents. The drainage plan shall demonstrate that therewill be
no increase in the site's historic runoff as a result of the new residence.
1. A letter from the primary contractor to the Community Development
Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and
understood.
4. The Applicant shall provide a new, individual sanitary sewer service line to serve
the proposed resid~nce. Then~\V s~rvic~Jineshallmeetfue stal1daf4softhy
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. Sanitary sewer service is contingent
upon compliance' with . the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's rules,
regulations, and specifications.
5. The Applicant shall install a new water service line to the residence that meets the
requirements of the City of Aspen W ater D~artment and provides sufficient
water pressure to serve the residential wat~r needs aJ:1clthefire sprinkler system
that is required by the Fire Marshal. If the water line is to be shared with other
residences, the Applicant shall sign a common Water service line 'agreement and
the residence shall have an individual water meter. Th~ Applicant shall abaJ:1don
the existing water service line at the main prior to making a new connection.
6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, all tap fees, impacts fees, and building
permit fees shall be paid, If an alternative agreement to delay payment of the
Water Tap and/or Parks hnpact fees pertaining to this property is finalized as part
of the Residences at Little Nell Final PUD project, those fees shall be payable
according to such agreement.
7. The Applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is
limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m, Monday through Saturday.
8. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System
Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water
IIII.IIIIIIILII II~II]I..~~~~~~ ~92'
SIi_VIA DAVIS PITKIN 'CC50NTYCO ^ .. R 26.00 0 0.00
Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as
they pertain to utilities.
r'\
9. All exterior lighting shall meet the City of Aspen Lighting Code requirements
setforth in Land Use Code Secti()1126.575,150, as may beamended from time
to time.
10. Two (2) off-street parking spaces designated for use by the residence on Lot 4
of the Tipple Woods Subdivision sha,llbe mainta,il1l::cl()nJl1Y adjacent Tipple
Woods Lodge property or a City approved parking alternative shall be enacted
in conjunction with the construction of the Residyllcys at Littlel'Sell()r the
Tippler Townhomes that will provide two (2) off-street parking spaces within
.the City that are to be designated for use by the single-family residence on Lot
4, of the Tipple Woods Subdivision.
Section 2:
Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26A70.070,GMQS E:;(emptions,a GMQS exemption is
herby granted for ^ a r~lacement residence provided that the Applicant pays the applicable
affordable housing impact fee prior to building permit issuance pursuant to Land Use Code
Section 26.470.070(B)(1)(d).
Section 3:
Pursuant to Land Use. Code Section 26.410, Residential Design Standards, the requested
variances from the Building Orientation, Build-to lines, and Secondary Mass Residential
Design Standards are hereby approved.
Section 4:
The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan
vested for a period oftfuee (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order.
No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary
to obtain a development order as set forth in this resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation Within the jurisdictional 'boundaries of the
City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific
, development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant' to this Title. Such notice
shall be substantially in the following,form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific
development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, pursuant to the
Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised
Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 4, of the Tipple
Woods Subdivision, by Resolution No. 12, Series of 2004, of the Aspen Planning
and Zoning Commission.
~
JL~JllU[{(]lJr lIifl l~f7:~:;~ ;.20<
" R 26.00 0 0. 00
Section 5:
All material representations and commitments made: by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal, approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Plarming and Zoning Commission, are hereby incOl'porated
in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth
herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 6:
This resolution shall n()t affegt any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended' as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted, and cOl1clllge:dtlllger.suQp prior
ordinances.
Section 7:
If any section, subsecti,on, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or llllconstitlltiQl19:1il19:.9Qll!"tqfsomp"e,t€mt jurisdiction, such portion shall
be d~emed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
, remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 20th day
of April, 2004.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIQN:
QJlf-
City Attorney
iJj . .--
(JJ.d~ /~-
J aSrllne Tygre, Chair '.',
ATTEST:
~
EXHIBIT A
ELMORE 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW
REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
26.435.030 -8040 Greenline Review Standfl:rds.
No development shall be permitted at, above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040
greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission mak~s a determination that the
proposed development complies with all requirements set forthb~lo\V,
1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for
development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine
subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the
parcel is found to contain hazardous or t(Jxic s(Jils, the applicant shall stabilize and
revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removedfrom the site to a
location acceptable to the city.
Staff Finding
Staff feels that the site is suitable for a single-family residence. A Geotechnical Report
created by a Colorado Licensed Engineer was conducted and concluded that the ground
stability was sufficient for a residence of thesiz~r~quested by the applicant. The
aforementioned report did not find any geologic hazards that would make the site un-
developable. However, the Applicant's Engineer did recommend several engineering controls
that should be enacted during construction as was explained in the Staff Memorandum. Staff
finds this criterion to be met.
2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the
natural watersfred, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have, consequent effects on
water pollution.
StaftFinding
Staff does not believe the development will have an adverse affect on the natural watershed,
runoff, drainage, soil erosion, or have consequent effects on water pollution. The Community
Development Engineer will review the grading and drainage plan for the site and proposed
residence prior to the issuance of building permits. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the
air quality in the city.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe this project will have an adverse effect on the air quality of the city.
The Environmental Health Department does not r~quire air quality mitigation for single-
family residences. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
5
~
4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is
compatible with tbe terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to
be located.
Staff Finding
Staff agrees with the Applicant's contention that the proposed single-family residence is sited
in a manner that is most compatible with the natural terrain. The Applicant has proposed to
excavate and site the proposed structure in essentially the same location as the existing
residence. The area of the existing residence is the only portion of the site that is relatively
flat because it was previously graded for the construction of the residence. Additionally, there
is no road or trail proposed to access the site and the Applicant is not proposing to alter the
location of the existing tram. Staff finds this criterioll to b~ met.
5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the
terrain, vegetation and naturallan.d features.
Staff Finding
As was previously stated, the Applicant has proposed to site the new residence in almost the
same footprint as that of the existing residence. Due to the severe slopes that exist on the
remainder of the property, Staff feels that using a similar footprint to that of the existing house
will minimize disturbance to the site aSlllllch. is practicable. Additionally, the Applicant has
consented to re-vegetate any areas disturbed during construction. That being the case, Staff
has proposed a condition of approval requiring that the Applicant re-vegetate any disturbed
areas prior to obtaining Certificate of Occupancy on the residence. Staff finds this criterion to
be met.
6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads,
limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a
scenic resource.
Staff Finding
There is only one structure proposed for the site. Additionally, Staff does not believe that the
proposed residence will have a significant impact on the mountain as a scenic resource given
that there is significant development on all of the properties abutting the subject site.
Moreover, Staff feels that the Applicant will limit grading to the extent possible by proposing
the new residence in almost the same 10cCltiol1 as the existing residence. Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be
designed to blend into the open character of the mountain.
Staff Finding
As was discussed in the Staff Memorandum, the proposed residence will be built slightly
under the required twenty-five (25) foot height limit and is allowed a relatively small FAR of
1,966 square feet due to slope reduction. Moreover, Staff does not believe that the proposed
residence 'Yill be extremely visible from the commercial core, Aspen Mountain, or South
6
~
,
Galena Street because the site is encircled by significantly larger developments. Staff finds
this criterion to be met.
8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the
proposed development.
Staff Finding
The property is serviced by all public utilities. The City of Aspen Water Department and the
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District are requiring that the Applicant make upgrades to the
respective service lines that serve this property. The utility agencies' concerns have been
reflected in the proposed conditions of approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said
roads can be properly maintained.
Staff Finding
The proposal will not include the development of a driveway in that the Applicant has
proposed to maintain access to the residel1c~ by means of the tram that currently exists to
access the existing residence. Additionally, the fire department has indicated that they are
comfortable with the tram access as it exists", Moreover, if the Residences at Little Nell
proposal is developed, the parking for this property will be placed in an underground parking
garage and an improved elevator access \V()ulci bedev~16ped. Therefore, Staff believes that
this criterion is not applicable in this situation.
10. Adequate ingress and egress is available tO,the proposed development so as to
'ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment.
Staff Finding
Staff has proposed a condition of approval that requires the Applicant to install a fire sprinkler
system in the proposed residence. Moreover, the Fire Marshal was consulted and did not have
an issue with the ingress and egress given that the residence is to contain a sprinkler system.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan:
ParksIRecreationlTrails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the
greatest extent practical.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe the proposed development conflicts with the AACP or Parks/
Recreation/Trails Plan. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
7
EXHIBIT B
RESIDENTlAL:Ql!:~IGN ~l'ANI:>AllI> YA~ANCE;S RE,VIEW
~ ,'" - ,,-, ',.... "- . -- ....- ",' ",_.' . -~. - ", -"',.-
REVIEWCRITE~IA &, STA}fF FINDINGS .
The Planning and'Z~;i~g C~~;i~;i~~;~ti~gi~;th~i5~signRe~iewAppeals'Committeemay
approve a variance from the Residential.Design Standards iftl1e proposed application meets
the following:
a) PrO'vides all. apprO'priate design O'r pattern O'f develO'pment
cO'nsidering the cO'ntext in which the develO'pment is prO'pased and
purpase O'f the particular stand.llrd.Jn eYll.ll!f!#llg the cO'ntext as it is
used in the crit~ria, the reviewing baard may cO'nsider the
relatiO'nship O'f the prO'pased develapment with adjacent structures,
the immediate neighb()1'hiJ'O'dsetting, ar a brO'ader vicinity as the
bO'ard feels is necessary to' determine if the eXceptiO'n is warranted; O'r,
b) Be clearly necessary far reasons affairness related to' unusual site-
specific canstraints.
The following are Staff s findings in regards to the vanances being requested by the
Applicant.
Variance Requested
Buildin~ orientation
The frontfacades of all principal structures shall
be parallel to the street. On, c9l'1JfXJ()ts, both
street facing facades must be parallel to the
intersecting streets. On curvilinear streets, the
front facade of all structures shall be parallel to
the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street.
Yes. No. Yes.
~
a) PrO'vides all. apprO'priate design O'r pattern O'f develO'pment
cO'nsidering the cO'ntextin which th~d~velO'pment is prO'pased and
purpase O'f the particular stalldll.r4.11l~l!.ll.{lJ:lIJing the can text as it is
used in the criteria, the reviewing bO'ard may cansider the
relatianship O'fthe prapO'sed develO'pment with adjacent structures,
the immediate neighbarhaO'd setting, or a brO'ader vicinity as the
bO'ardfeels is neces$ary to' determine if the exceptiO'n is warranted; O'r,
Staff Finding:
Several of the other structures in the i1ll1llecli(lJyY~9il1~~Y that are served by the tram also do not
meet the building orientation requirement because they are orlented in a mallller th(lt allQ\Vs
them to have entrances onto the tram. Tl1eryfQre, Staff feels that the proposal is consistent
8
with that of the neighboring properties for functional purposes. Staff finds this criterion to be
met.
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual.s.it~..
specific constraints.
Staff Finding:
This site has several site-specific constraints that ,warrant relief frolU this specific design
standard in that a driYy'Yay does not serve the property and the majority of the property
consists of severely steep slopes. Thus, Staff feels that the stl'llctlll'e has b~~l1appropriately
oriented to allow for the tram to b~~ct~ily accessible as a means of ingress and egress.
.Moreover, the front fa9ade of the proposed structure is dose to being parallel to Galena Street
even though it has no lot frontage on South Galena Street. Staff f~~l~tbJ,!t tbe.Applicant has
attempted to meet the intent of the stallc1<irc1@cl$t<ifff,iD;clstl1.i~~rit~ri.9l1 to...1J~,1Uet.
Variance Requested
BUILD- TO LINES
On parcels of less than 15,000 square feet, at least 60% of the front fac;ade shall be within 5
feet of the minimum front yard setback line. Qn cQrner sites, at least 60% of both street
facades of the building shall be within 5 feet of the minimum setback lines. Porches may be
used to meet the 60% standard.
a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development
considering the context in which the development is proposed and
purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is
used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the
relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures,
the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the
board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
Staff Finding:
As was the case with thebuildil1g orientationsiandi;lfd, Staff does not feel that thisstallc1<l1:"d is
all that applicable given that this standard is also int~l1clecI t(), address, tb~r~l(ltiol1ship between
a residence and the stre~t. In <iclditign, several of the other surrounding properties that are also
served by the tram do not have 60%, of tl1~ir fr()l1tf':1sades within five (5) feet of the of their
front yard setback. Thus, in looking at this request in a neighborhood context Staff feels that a
granting a variance from this stallc1<irc1\V()ylcl, yield consistency with the immediate existing
development. Staff finds this criterion to b~met.
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unusual site-
specific constraints.
Staff Finding:
Staff feels that the requested variance from the build-to lill~s st@cl<l1:"cI is appropriate in that it
is felt that strict compliance with this standard WQlll4 l'~quire more natural disturbance due to
the excavation of steep slopes than would the proposed design. The area within about ten (10)
feet ofthe front yard setback is almost all coyer~cl py slopes of greater than thirty (30) percent.
9
~
That being the case, in order to site the structure within this arya theApplicant would have to
do a larger excavation. A more significant excavation would likely result in added natural
disturbance. Thus, Staff feels that unusual site-specific constraints exist to warrant granting
the build-to lines variance. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
Variance Requested
SECONDARY MASS
The secondary mass standard requires that all
new structures shall locate at least 10% of their
total square footage above grade in a mass,
which is completely detached from the principal
building, or linked to it by a subordinate
connecting element. Accessory buildings such as
garages, sheds, and Accessory Dwelling Units
are examples of appropriate uses for the
Secondary Mass. A subordinate linking element
for the purposes of secondary mass shall be
defined as an element not less than six (6) feet in
width and ten (10) feet in length with a plate
height of not more than nine (9) feet.
"-
...........
........... ~.
''>.--.--
-"
a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development
considering the context in which the dev[!lopment is proposed and
purpose of the particular standard. In (;!valuating the context as it is
used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the
relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures,
the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the
board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
Staff Finding:
The majority of the structures along the 700 block of S. Galena Street were built prior to
enacting the secondary mass standard. The three (3) other single-family residences that are
served by the tram do not meet the seconc.lary mass standard. Therefore, in evaluating the
request in the .context of the existing development on the surrounding properties, Staff
believes that a variance from this standard is GOl1Si~t(;mt\VithJhy~llITQllJ:lsling development.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-
specific constraints.
Staff Finding:
The Applicant has proposed to use a similar footprint on the proposed residence to that of the
existing residence in order to limit the natural c.listurbance. That being the situation, the area
of the existing footprint is limited in size due to the steep slopes that encompass the property.
Additionally, the lot is a substandard triangular lot that provides a buildable area in the shape
of a triangle. Meeting the secondary mass standard usually requires a sufficient amount of
10
~
buildable site, which Staff feels is limited in the instance by both the irregular shape of the lot
and the steep slopes that exist. Staff finds this yriterion to be met.
11
';s
MEMORANDUM
,". .......,...., ".'..;..,'....).",....,..
Ex h l'/u /'1 \\/J i/
To: Development Review Committee
From: John Niewoehner, Community Development Engineer,
DRC Case load Coordinator
Date: March 3, 2004
Re:3/3/04DRC Minutes: Anderman 8040 Greenline Review
Attendees:
James Lindt, Case Planner - Community Development Department
Nick Adeh, Engineering Department
John Niewoehner,/Community Development Department
Phil Overeynder, Water Department
Tom Bracewell, Sanitation District
Jerry Nye, Streets Department
Ed VanWalraven, Fire Department
Brooke Peterson, Applicant
Sunny Vann, Planning Consultant
Kim Weil, Bill Poss Architects and Planners
At the March 3, 2004, the Development Review Committee reviewed the following project:
Anderman 8040 Greenline Review - The proposal is to demolish an existing 800 sq. ft. house
and replace it with a1900sq.ft.h6use.dthesite isexfremeW difficult in thafitTs accessible only
by either a tramway or many stairs. Jhedevelopment of this house will likely be part of the
proposed Tippler Townhomes Project or Residences at Little Nell Project. Regardless, the DRC
evaluation has to consider how the proposed Anderman Project could be built without the larger
'Tippler' or 'Residences' projects.
DRC COMMENTS
Engineering:
1. Construction Manaqement Plan: Due to site constraints, an extensive Construction
Management Plan is needed as part of the building permit that includes:
. Sequence of Construction Events.
. Access to site by construction vehicles dl,Jring each construction event
. A slope stabilization plan developed by a qualified professional engineer
. Haul and delivery routes
. Parking
. Erosion and Dust Control Plan
2. Drainaqe: A qualified professional engineer must provide a drainage plan and report for
the site. Roof drainage cannot be routed down the steep slopes. Any drainage plan
that includes dry wells must be reviewed by a geotechnical engineer.
3. Geotechnical Report: A geotechnical report is needed for the project that addresses
slope stabilization and mudflow issues.
Parks Department
1. Tree Removal: An approved tree permit is required prior to approval of the building
permit. An approved tree permit requires a proposed landscape plan identifying trees for
removal and means of mitigation. Please contact the City Forester for more information
920-5126. '
2. Tree Protection: A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each
individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site. There will be no storage of
construction materials, backfill, tools or construction traffic inside of the protective fence.
There is no excavation or disturbance of the. native arecLin~ide ofJhe protective fence.
....
("'"')
Page 2 of 2
March 3, 2004
Anderman DRC - 8040 Greenline
This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5126) before
any construction activities are to commence.
No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of
equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree on site.
3. Erosion Control: Silt fencing installed to the City of Aspen standards. Additional erosion
control measures may be necessary depending upon the site.
4. Landscapinq: Based on the mitigation for tree removal an approved landscape plan will
need to be submitted to the parks department.
Fire Department
1 Sprinklers: A sprinkler system will be required. Water pressure needs to be adequate for
sprinklers to work. Per the Water Department, current water pressure is inadequate.
2 Alarms: The Fire Department may require an alarm system.
Sanitation District
1. Separate Service Line: Currently, the existing house shares a sewer service with the two
neighboring houses. This sewer serviceruns down an easement under the tramway. To
conform to current standards disallowing shared services, a new and separate sewer
service would have to be constructed for the Anderman residence. The location of this
new sewer service will depend on whether the 'Tippler' or the 'Residences' is
constructed.
2. ACSD Standards: Service is contingent upon cornpliance with the District's rules,
regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office.
Water Dept:
1. Water Tap: Water Pressure is currently inadequate from the 0Id1-1/4" dia. g.L service
line. The proposed house with sprinkler system must be served by a 2" dia wafer service
line sized by a Sprinkler Design Company. Water pressure and delivery rates from
the existing galvanized service line is inadequate to provide for the required fire
sprinkler system. The service line needs to be replaced with a new Iille capable of
delivery of sufficient water to meet the requirements for fire protection established
by the Aspen Fire Protection I?istrict.
2. Existina Service Line Abandonment: TheelCi$ting service must be abandoned at
the main prior to making a new connection.
3. Common Service Line Aqreement fI/Iultiple buildings can be served by the new water tap
if each building is metered and controllable and there is a Common Service Line
Agreement.
4. City Standards Compliance: All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen
Water System Standards, with Title 25, and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water
Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain
to utilities.
To: John Niewoehner <johnn@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: Fwd: 3/3/04 DRC Minutes - Anderman 8040
Cc: nealg@ci.aspen.co.us, keithw@ci.aspen.co.us
John,
Please replace the language regarding service tap size (we don't specify the size" the fire sprinkler co will
have to calculate) with the following:
Water pressure and delivery rates form the existing galvanized service line is inadequate to provide for the
required fire sprinkler system. The service line needs to be replaced with a newline capable of delivery of
sufficient water to meet the requirements for fire protection established by the Aspen Fire Protection District.
The existing service must be abandoned at the main prior to making a new connection.
Phil
rl,;" n
-c. ",,'-,.,/,;r,
Aspen Consolidated SanttationDistrict'
,1,,-.
Paul Smith * Chairman
Michael Kelly * Vice~ Chair
John Keleher * Sec/Treas
March 16, 2004
REceIVED
M~R 1 7 2004 '
A:stJtN
BUIlDfHGDe>ARTMENT
F~ank Loushin
Roy Holloway
Bruce Matherly, Mgr
James Lindt
Community Development
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
,Re: Anderman 8040 GreenJine.Revi~w
Dear James:
We currently have sufficient collection and treatment capacity to serve tIlls proposed
development. Our detailed comments. on this application were made at the development review
meeting on 3-3-04 by Tom Bracewell o~r line superintendent.
As usual, service is contingent upon compliance with' the district's rules, reguhitlons, and
specifications which ate on file at the district office. betailed, phms must be. subrllitted to the
district office for the completion of a tap permit which will estimafe the sanitation fees forthe '
, ' .
project. All fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~'7\A.~~
Bruce Matherly
District M.anager
565 N. Mill St., Aspen, CO 8161 (1(970)925~J6011 FAX (970)925-2537
. ',,;-,,'-'-~ "...,"', ,~,"c"__^~,,,; ,~
I;'
: i: :'~;, ':~: ". -, ^"
""",:,~,::", .;
; ..-,~,-., v. :<,..;.i(~_,__,_-",
~
Anderman 8040 Greenline Review
March 3, 2004
Tree Removal:
An approved tree permit is required prior to approval of the building permit. An
approved tree permit requires a proposed landscape plan identifying trees for removal and
means of mitigation. Please contact the City Forester for more information 920-5126.
Tree Protection:
A vegetation 'protection fence shall be erectedatthe drip line of each individual tree or
groupings of trees remaining on site. There will be no storage of construction materials,
backfill, tools or construction traffic inside of.the protective fence. There is no
excavation or disturbance of the native area il1sigeof the protective fence. This fence
must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5126) before any
construction activities are to commence.
No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of
equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowedwithin.the drip line of any tree on site.
Erosion Control:
Silt fencing installed to the City of Aspen standards. Additional erosion control measures
may be necessary depending upon the site.
Landscaping: .
Based on the mitigation for tree removal an approved landscape plan will need to be
submitted to the parks department.
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: ANDERMAN PROPERTY (710 S" GAL:ENA ST.) 8040 GREENLINE
REVIEW AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 20,
2004 at a meeting to, begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning
Commission, Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an
application submitted by Aspen Land Fund, LLC requesting approval of an 8040
Greenline Review an4, Resi4ential Design Standard V arian<1~s ,fr()Il1 ,t.he Building
Orientation, Build-to-lines, and Secondary Mass requirements of the City of Aspen Land
Use Code (Section 26.410) in order to construct a single-family residence at 710 S.
Galena Street. The subject property is legally described as Lot 4, of the Tipple Woods
Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact James Lindt
at the City of Aspen Commllllity Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen,
CO (970) 920-5095, (or by email atjamesl@ci.aspen.co.us). Please send all written
correspondence regarding the application to the city staff member referenced above to
enter into the public record.
s/Jasmine TVf!re. Chair
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published.in the Aspen Times on April 3, 2004
City of .Aspen Account"" '...'......,.. ....."'..'.........,,'.'......,...., ......".."".",.......
~,;;(,;:"'Y8~,.~:\~<.;,'J":h,T;~+i":);':,:-s':.~"";;"'.,-,-
.- .....:....":<,....."...:-.'.'
> "~",,,,+':,tt;/;":;""::;;O:'<';'>"')'" ,c
->'-;......'i
Jam Free Printing
Use Averj'fJ TEMPLATE 5160@
ASPEN ALPENBLlCK NO 3 LLC
211 VINE ST
DENVER, CO 80206
ASPEN SKlING COMPANY
PO BOX 1248
ASPEN, CO 81612
BECKMAN SUSAN R
POBOX 8167
ASPEN, CO 81612
BRENDAMOUR DOUGLAS P CHILDRENS
TRUST
6105 PARK RD
CINCINNATI,OH 45243
CRAWFORD JACK B
PO BOX U3
ASPEN, CO 81612
DUFF DAVID A TRUSTEE
PO BOX 305
CHAVIES, KY 41727
ESTABROOKS FAMILY TRUST
37 EMERALD BAY
LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651
FLYNN MICHAEL T
PMB 105-512
700 NW GILMAN BLVD
ISSAQUAH, WA 98027-5395
GALENA PLACE LLC
C/O PAT KIRIANOFF
PO BOX 1931
BIG BEAR LAKE, CA 92315
GIANULlAS JIM & MARILYN H
PO BOX 2990
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
~09~S @A}J'S!!JAV ~
~:r~:!'2Ei:12S:=-~~'~=,-,. ,~
-
-
www.avery.com
1-800-GO-A VERY
()
C/O KAUFMAN & PETERSON
315 E HYMAN
ASPEN, CO 81611
BANK OF AMERICA NA
PO BOX 35140
LOUISVILLE, KY 40232
BIELINSKI JUDITH
2121 TROWBRIDGE CT
GLENVIEW,IL 60025
BRIGHT CONDOS
A LOUISIANA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
701 POYDRAS ST STE 300 PLAZA
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70139
DICKIE E GORDON M 0 1999
REVOCABLE TRUST
25060 PINE HILLS DR
CARMEL, CA 93923
DURANT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
747 S GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81612
FASCHING HAUS CONDOMINIUM ASSOC
INC
747 S GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
FRIEDMAN KARL
10 CHERRY HILLS DR
CHERRY HILLS, CO 80110
GAME JAMES A & MICHAELA
PO BOX 451
PALISADE, CO 81526
GOOCH WILLIAM A
20211STAVE #TG
SEATTLE, WA 98121
A}f3^Y-09-008-t.
WO:l'A.isAe'MMM
-
-
EXHIBIT
ASPEN LAND
PO BOX 8238
ASPEN, CO 8161
~
.D
.D
S
~
BAUER RACHAEL ANN
521 E COOPER AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
BORTNICHAK WALTER JR
728 GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
CAMERON JAMES & NANCY
169 FAWN VALLEY DR
MC MURRAY, PAr 15317
DISALVO MARCIA J
500 W BLEEKER ST
ASPEN, CO 81611-1228
DURANT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNIT 14
747 S GALENA
ASPEN, CO 81611
FlAGSTAD DANIEL G & MARY J
715 E SCRANTON AVE
LAKE BLUFF, lL 60044
FUREY JAMES H
4 DRUID LN
RIVERSIDE, CT 06878
GERMANOW IRVING
13 TOBEY WOODS
PITTSFORD, NY 14534
GRAND ASPEN LODGING LLC
1000 S MILL ST
ASPEN, CO 81611-3800
~09t.S 31'11dW3.1 ~SAY asn
6u!lU!Jd aSJ::i wer
Jam Free Printing
Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 5160@
GURTNER THOMAS & NANCY
175 COMMONWEALTH AVE
BOSTON, MA 02116
HEUSERINVESTMENTSLLC
2626 E ARIZONA BILTMORE CIR #33
PHOENIX, AZ 85016
JACOB PAUL MITCHELL
400 E 20TH ST #10-0
NEW YORK, NY 10009
JAMNER HOWARD & JESSICA
29 MICAHELS WY
WESTON, CT 06883
KRAJIAN RON N
2700 NEWPORT BLVD #222
NEWPORT, CA 92663
KRIBS KAREN
PO BOX 9994
ASPEN, CO 81612
LONG CHRISTOPHER & GRETA 50%
6015 VESSEY RD
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80908
MARSH JAMES W & BEVERLY M
815 TROPICAL CIR
SARASOTA, FL 34242
MIDDELBERG MARIA B
DBA MODETTE
150 PURCHASE ST
RYE, NY 10583
MILLER TANYA B
2445 W GULF DR
SANIBEL ISLAND, FL 33957
~09I.S @AlJaAV ~
--
www.avery.com
@ AVERY@ 5160@
HEATH HETTA S TRUSTEE
606 N SPRING ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
HUNT JACK P TRUST
C/O HUNT JAMES S JR
1700 NW 97 TERR
CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071
JACOBY ENTERRPRISES INC
WYOMING CORPORATION
111 CENTER ST STE 2500
LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201.
KOSFIELD ASPEN LLC
NATIONSBANK TOWER
100 S E 2ND ST STE 2800
MIAMI, FL 33131-2144
KRAJIAN RONALD N
617 E COOPER AVE #114
ASPEN, CO 81611
LIEBEL CRAIG E
814 PLUM ST
CINCINNATI,OH 45202
M & M INVESTMENTS
C/O MAYER CHARLES
679 BRUSH CREEK RD
ASPEN, CO 81611
MEYERS DENNIS & BARBARA A
9725 PARI<WAY DR
HIGHLAND, IN 46322
MILLER BECKY B & PETER C
200-06 CROSS ISLAND PI<WY
BA YS1DE, NY 11360
MITTLEMAN DAVID
2735 MEADOWLARK LN
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409
A,1I3^ '1-09-008-1.
wo;).JtIa^e'MMM
-
-
HENN PRESTON B & BETTY 0
3501 W SUNRISE BLVD
FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33311
IMMO SASSAFRAS INC
C/O ROBERT ANDERSON
3290 NORTHSIDE PI<WY NW #225
ATLANTA, GA 30327
JAEGER WILLIAM N
439 N DOHENY DR
BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210
KOSFREUDFIELD ASPEN LC
10 S E 2ND ST STE 2800
MIAMI, FL 331317
KRAJIAN RONALD N
PO BOX 8867
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
LIVINGSTON DAVID
MYRIAD INVESTMENTS INC
1003 PARCHEMENT DR S E
GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49506
MANDELBAUM MERVYN & JEANETTE
TRUSTEES
1735 S SANTA FE AVE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90021
MICHAELS INGEBORG
600 GARRISON COVE LN #9
TAMPA, FL 33602
MILLER LELAND L
11575 FOLSOM PT LN
FRANKTOWN, CO 80116
MONKARSH JERROLD 0 & JOYCE
TRUSTEES
9061 SANTA MONICA BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90069
@09LS 31'l1d1l\l31 @AJa^'f asn
6u!lU!Jd aaJ:i wer
Jam Free Printing
Use Averylf!) TEMPLATE 51601f!)
MONTGOMERY M MEAD & ANNE M
945 OLD GREEN BAY RD
WINNEKTA,IL 60093
NORTON PATRICK J JR
507 SPRING VALLEY DR
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PASQUINELLI SALLIE S
747 S GALENA ST #9
ASPEN, CO 81611
PEACE OF ASPEN TOWNHOUSE LLC
C/O MLR LC
PO BOX 557
SPIRIT LAKE, IA 51360
RAMYEAD VISHNU & TEIKA
6161 WOODLAND VIEW DR
WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364
RIDOUT WAYNE E & ROBBYE L
42 COUNTRY CLUB CIR
SEARCY, AR 72143
RUSSELL SCOTT B
70 RIVERBEND RD
SNOW MASS, CO 81654
SEGUIN MIKE A
PO BOX 1914
ASPEN, CO 81612
TALLlCHET DAVIDC JR & CECILIA A
8191 E KAISER BLVD
ANAHEIM, CA 92808
THURBON ROBERT W JR 50%
1034 ST PAUL RD
CINC1NNATI,OH 45202
@09~S @^'tJ~V ~
i
-
-
WWW.av~ry.com
1-800-GO-A VERY
MOORE PHILIP B & KATHLEEN
747 S GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
OLSON PAUL
PO BOX 128
BRECKENRIDGE, CO 80424
PATRICK GARY R & PATRICIA A
537 MARKET ST STE 202
CHATTANOOGA, TN 37402
PLASTICS MANAGEMENT INC
53916 N MAIN ST
MATTAWAN, MI 49071
REEVES LESLEY S
C/O STEPHEN M SCHERER
7510 YORK DR
ST LOUIS, MO 63105
ROLF ROBERT WILLIAM
747 GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
SASSAFRAS IMMO INC
ROBERT ANDERSON CNSL LLC
3290 NORTHSIDE PKWY NW #225
ATLANTA, GA 30327
SIMMONS SUSAN K
31381 MONTERREY ST
S LAGUNA, CA 92677
TAUBER REAL ESTATE LLC
27777 FRANKLIN RD STE 1850
SOUTHF1ELD, MI 48034
TICONDEROGACOMPANY
3108 COVINGTON LAKE DR
FTWAYNE, IN 46804
A1I3^,v.09-OOS- ~
WO:l.JtIaAe'N\MM
-
-
@ AVERY@ 5160@
NOREN LARA L & STEPHEN C
10927 BRIGANTINE DR
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256-9544
PASQUINELLI MARY ANN
747 S GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
PATTERSON L S & F E TRUST 60%
SCHNEIDER C A PATTERSON 40%
580 CEMETERY LN
ASPEN, CO 81611
PLATTS JOHANNA E
7 40 FLAGSTAFF RD
BOULDER, CO 80302
RHOADES CHRISTINE ANN LYON LIVING
TRUST
644 GRIFFITH WY
LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651
ROSE EDWARD D & JULIE
5975 MAPLE
BERKELEY,IL 60163
SCHERER STEPHEN M
169 SHORECLlFF RD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92625
STENEMAN ROBERT & MARY JANE
PO BOX 9469
ASPEN, CO 81612
TAVEL MORTON & CAROL
1139 FREDERICK DR S
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46260
TIPPLE INN #12 LLC
GARY JACOBS
POBOX 59 - ATTN: ADELlNA GUZMAN
LAREDO, TX 78042-0059
@09~S 31YldW31 ~a^"1 asn
6u!lU!Jd aeJ~ wel
-
www.avery.com
1-800-GO-AVERY
@ AVERY@ 5160@
Jam Free Printing
Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 5160@
-
TOBEY ROBERT W & PATRICIA A
41 CHERRY HILLS FARM DR
ENGLEWWOOD, CO 80110-7113
TULlPANI FAMILY TRUST
747 S GALENA ST #201A
ASPEN, CO 81611-1872
METER FAM LVG TRST
WESTERN LAB MEDICAL GRP
2945 WEBSTER ST
OAKLAND, CA 94609-3406
..
WAGNER & BROWN LTD
300 N MARIENFELD #1100
PO BOX 1714
MIDLAND, TX 79702
WATKINS DAN H TRUSTEE
35758TH ST
MOLlNE,IL 61265-7157
WERNER STEFANIA P TRUST
9555 LADUE RD
ST LOUIS, MO 63124
WESTPAC ASPEN INVESTMENTS LLC
805 AEROVISTA PL SUITE 202
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-7920
ZODIAC PROPERTIES L TO
628 S GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
-
@09~S 3l.'I1dW3! @/uaNrf asn
6u!l-U!Jd aaJ:I wer
@09~S @AH3AV @
A}:I3^"-09-00S-1.
wo)'/ua^e'MMM
-
L""",',d
.,-~.,~~~~~~.' . .~..
,,_~,.' '!" 1 ~
""~~';;~',;,';'~,i:"~"7'~+;~"';"'--" ~--,,,_:,.'."" .. _..i
.._ ._..._~_____._................____~~~.:!":~l~!~""l,~!"~Io-':,_~
.". ::;,~~~vli"'nr:::':-::;;; ';;;~;~:~t~~::.::~-~'~'~';':-~--" ~....~~,:,..,."",;~...,;~",~~,,":l<l"""-:.~,~
,...........,,..,..........,"'1...,,....._,.<...
~
ATTACHMENT 7
AFFIDAVltOF''I50Brh:'NOr'ICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26:304.060'(el, ASPENtAND USE CODE
//,,6~.. ~--1t:.~4
ADDRESS OF PROPERTy:dJr 4. 77~ \V"~" 2~.(3. , Aspen, CO
/
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING 'DATE:
,200_
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I, ~...<;/~y--, ' vq~/../ (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
V Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
watel'proof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the ,:;:'dday of
,-f/7)/L , 200L, to and including the date and time of the public
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
V~ailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which cOIltains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government,
school, service district or other governmental or quasi-govertttnental agency that
owns property within three hundred (300) feet ofthe property subject to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
r"'\
("",
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall-
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all b inesS1iOUr~r fifteen (15) days
,_____ I
prior to the public hearing on such ame,JJdrr1' ts. ,,/
// -, _---.L
--. -~
The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotic~" was acknowledged before me this 11- day
of_~\ll ,200i, by SU'Y\(\~ VQ.f\r\_
~\\\"""""11111.
~"", ,~A eLI.:'II;.:
~~~~....h...V.~ ~
~.:t ... ....~~~
:::' .' OTA '. ~
.::: :...\ 1111':::
t=*: \' ': =
= : ~... .*=
- . . -
- . p . ....
%~... UBL\C ....DI
~"'~" ..' ~~
~ ~O"'" ...'O~~~
"1111. F CO\'; \\\~
11"I/IIlIl"\\\~
My Commission Expire.
Dee 2007
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My commission expires:
J}M~
tary PublIc
J)e (. ;)(rJ1-
CJu;!fr
rTACHMENTS:
)F THE PUBLICATION
F THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
VERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BY MAIL
....
~~~
d
~,
,r---..
A TT ACHMENT 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 71D ,~ba /e(/(q
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: tt / ?f')I2:2Cf' '
; Aspen, CO
,200
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I, .~ q \/\A \Q~ c:.. t')0J {- (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the fQllQ\Ving manner:
~. PubUcation of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an Qjficial
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen a 5)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached heren;
Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community DevelopmerifDepartInerit, which was made of suitable,
watel'Proof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed sfletters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of
, 200_,to and including the date and time of the pu~ic
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attacheihereto. I
:,
Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the CommUnity
Development Department, which contains the info11i1ation described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen L~d Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
tJ1e public hearing, notice Was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government,
school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that
owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property .subject to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be
those on the current tax r~cords of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
/"""\
r\.
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a gel1-eral revision
of this Title, or whenever the text ofthis Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Titleand enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
The
of
regoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged, befor): th~
~ ,200!l,by ~ ) -
~~"..,..,...."~~-'.^'_.....~.
p' UC NOTICE' "',"
RE: ,ANDERMAN ROPERTY (710 S. GALENA
ST"..",).., 80,4, 0, G,RE,.E.N,',., L, E R EV,IE, W A, N D RES IDENTIA, L
DESIGN STANDAR VARIANCES
NOTICE IS. EREBY GIVEN that a public
.;,-:-.e'aring will be held on Tuesday, April 20, 2004 at
a Il!eeting to begin at 4:30 p,m. bef<)re the Aspen
PliH1ni~g. and. Zoning. Co~~i~sil:m,__Si_~!~!,<<;:iti~s
Room, City Hall, l30S.GaJ<ina,st..Aspen,to con>.'
sider an application submitted by Aspen Land
Fund, LLC requesting approval of an 8040 Gre.ene
Iin,e Review and Resid~ntii'l Design, Standard Var-
iances ,from the Buildtiig Orlentati()n. Build-to-
lin~s, - and Secondary Mass, requir_ements _ of the,"_
City of Aspen Land Use Code (S,ection ~6Al 0), in '
~-order to con~truct_ a - single-family res"idence at'
7lQ S. Galena Str~et. The subject property is le-
gally described as Lot 4, of the Tipple Woods
Subdivision, City and Townsiteof Aspen.
For, further JnforI11ati()~"c:()~t8:ct,JaIIl~s_PI1d~ _ ~t
the City of Aspen'j,mmuniiY'Ilevelopment De-'
partment, 130 S. Gal na St., Aspen, CO (970) 920.
'5,.0.9.,....5 ',(or bY", e, maio .at iamesl@cLaspen.co.us).:
Ple<iSe sel1d ,all writ, ncorrespondence regarding
the applicatiori to he city staff member refer-
c _;;\":!1c~d,:).I;>()~~_t() -=r1J_, ,~!:t(}}~e P1J_~li~_.recorc:I.
~-~. "'.",....".~.""_.~....S7JasmineTYgre, thair, '
Aspen Planning and Zoning C()ll!misslon '
Published in The Aspen Times oh April 3, 2004,
(138'0)
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
ATTACHMENTS:
COpy OF THE PUBLICATION
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BYMAIL
t:
-:;,.'"
Helen Miller, 04:42 PM 04/16/2004, Aspen Fund LLC
Page 1 of 1
Subject: Aspen Fund LLC
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:42:10 -0700
Thread-Topic: Aspen Fund LLC
Thread-Index: AcQkBA2EnT700ZfNQwGask6296bqaQ==
From: "Helem Miller" <hmiller@ejmdevelopment.com>
D 15 ~1\ 10 lA~~d!
~ p+- 'Z:- ~+-
~~. 1-i~dV~!AC')
o V\ 5fj26 /04
To: <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us> I ( ,
X-:MX-Spam: final=0.0134395222; heur=0.5000000000(700); stat=0.0090000000; spamtraq-
heur=0.6000000000(2004041607), '
X-:MX - MAIL- FROM: <hmiller@ejmdevelopment.com>
X-:MX-SOURCE-IP: [64.3.83.162]
X-MaiIScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean,
;;:::'
~
.".-
,>"
Dear Mr. Lindt:
I am the President of the Galena Place CondOminium Association. Our property is in very close proximity to the
proposed residence to be built at 130 Galena Street. WhHe we Clre not opposed to the tear down and re-build, we
would like to ask the Planning & Zoning Commissioners to impose some time constraints as to when construction
work can commence and end. The reason beingc Is that we collectively have eight bedrooms directly below and
adjacent to the proposed house construction property. I understand you allow 7 a.m. - 7 p.m. work times. I
respectfully request that the hours of work be limited to 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. 'so as to allow some measure of quiet.
do not believe this will impose an undue hardship on the applicant.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Jerry Monkarsh
President
Galena Place Condominium Association
310278 1830,
cc: Galena Place Homeown~rs Kirianoff, Mandelbaum, James
Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
04/20/2004
~
r"\
~
e3'.........:.~
~
~
-.~
,~~