The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.426 E Hyman Ave.HPC10-96 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET CITY OF ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DATE RECEIVED: 4/3/96 CASE# HPC 10-96 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#2737-073-39-010 PROJECT NAME: 426 East Hyman Building HPC Conceptual Review Project Address: 426 East Hyamn, Aspen APPLICANT: L and M Properties Address/Phone: 410 E. Hyman, Aspen REPRESENTATIVE: Dick Fallin Address/Phone: Baker Fallin Assoc., Inc., 1280 Ute Ave., Aspen, 925-4252 PLANNING FEE: $580 #APPS RECEIVED 1 #PLATS RECEIVED 2 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Significant Developmen Review Body kleeting Date Public Hearing ? HPC []Yes ❑No P&Z ❑Yes [:]No cc I ❑Yes ❑No CC (2nd reading) ❑Yes [_]No REFERRALS: ❑ City Attorney ❑ Zoning ❑ Environmental Health ❑ City Engineer ❑ Housing ❑ Parks ❑ Planning ❑ Other: ❑ Other: DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DATE DUE: CLOSED/FILED DATE: INITIALS: ROUTE TO: 426 E Hyman 8~ Signif Conceptual 2737-073-39-010 HPC 10-96 I 84 M -5-6 H -1 . '.4-3 %*1/249'/idnitinm /.1 242*r r,Ha/+ , 4 4 : illil J 3,1,111,0 . A 11...L arlill.*,ill" 1 1 . -0 8 /4-5, 2 I . .- N 1 1 2 th 7. A 4. f. 1/2 /20 j c -r IM:,09//Immillil! Â· . 42&4* 7 7. 4,41'.71?1 1 im|' , - --Â»9 - 9 f-- M , 2 11/42--22 --0 -9 .3,-37 . 1 , /1 - . , I. fi . *. .1 ./ 1 .... 1 1 -. ....... 71 7 1 -4-2 1 .2-:Xy#M -'' 6 s T 7 L i 4943-, Â· i -frit~~ -......I.....2 4 ' 48' '' 4 4,1 7 142 .. A l 1 h 1 <*Ir -1 i ,1, -m Â·Â· Aiiiimnilm,i. . 0 1-n-.--1 .Imml'rr~wr . e 12 4, Bt[ 1 01. . --.1. '01 2.-Â£ -4/ - -7- 1-,21.-21- ..1~/// ve 1 - 4/0-- . , " - .r .. Â· â€¢-112.-%40*-ail./.I- --'r. - c 79...3/- -Ir / -4 . 19,4 4'. X 1-11 0 1 . Vk.. . . .le . . ... . 6 k *47 . 0 . 8.Â¥ .,. > .0?Si. I ' ...... d <5671 . '42 4, I 5-1 -2 -.0/miA. e A 5,6. / ..4 * ;if,Â·-till~Ommni + -7-0 \ . I . 144, m 1/ e .. -11 0 I 1 liaN . 1 4. 3- '111- -, Lt >1VLÂ» ---51/.4 - i . ..r' ' _A-42=-1 - 2_ 6.-. Lolix T1. 1.1111 -2- -1 - -L -- -1-*- - - 11 '1 pp lilli .LL 7---- Â° ~+ 1#'1: 1 Mn. .---- 1---776 -- -10-133515- / - t~kit - *,IA 'Ill~/#i//lili'# f=â„¢11 1 4- . , 1 1 11.1,1 1 U &91-2 4/11111111111.11111116 -. ./. , . "/I/'d "&.*6*, ' , =:=A**=~,4~ *I-/I . ---. Il........ : 4/0/. ' , I 46 j = - . 1, XM'Q_ , 1,1 i -t - i f T~~*Y+I#FLE,MEF,~2,0 . .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET CITY OF ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DATE RECEIVED: 4/3/96 CASE # HPC 10-96 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID # 2737-073-39-010 PROJECT NAME: 426 East Hyman Building HPC Conceptual Review Project Address: 426 East Hyamn, Aspen APPLICANT: L and M Properties Address/Phone: 410 E. Hyman, Aspen REPRESENTATIVE: Dick Fallin Address/Phone: Baker Fallin Assoc., Inc., 1280 Ute Ave., Aspen, 925-4252 PLANNING FEE: $580 # APPS RECEIVED 1 # PLATS RECEIVED 2 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Significant Developmen Revieâ€ž lind, Meeting Datt! l'ublic Ilearing ? HPC C]Yes CINO P&Z C]Yes C]No CC C]Yes UNO CC (2nd reading) C]Yes UNO REFERRALS: m City Attorney Il Zoning El Environmental Health m City Engineer l Housing Il Parks 0 Planning Il Other: Il Other: DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DATE DUE: CLOSED/FILED DATE: INITIALS: ROUTE TO: 0 N-15 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 40 THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director / FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 426 E. Hyman Avenue, Conceptual Review- PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 10, 1996 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval for a signficant remodel of the existing building at 426 E. Hyman Avenue. This building was built in 1969-1970 and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. It exceeds current FAR allowances. APPLICANT: L and M properties, represented by Baker Fallin Assoc. LOCATION: 426 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot P, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: "CC," Commercial Core. Conceptual Development PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. Response: The project involves remodeling of the existing structure, to create a new street facade. 1 .. Currently, there are two stairs in the building, one in the front corner, which is a shared required egress with the Sportstalker building, and the other which is on the alley. These existing staircases control where the floor levels for the building lie. - Staff is very much in support of a remodel of this building as it has none of the typical features or characteristics of the adjacent historic structures and does nothing to strengthen the qualities of the historic district. In reviewing the design guidelines for new construction in the Commercial Core, the guidelines clearly encourage carrying the proportions, solid-to-void ratios, cornice lines, storefronts, and other features of historic commercial buildings through in new construction, preferably in a contemporary, rather than imitative manner. The proposed design reflects very little in the way of those historic characteristics, due in great part to the location of the floor levels, which do not align with those of the Sportstalker or Aspen Drug. Historic commercial buildings in Aspen tend to have a "grand" first floor level for shops, with about 16' from floor to ceiling. The first floor level of the proposed structure is 11' from floor to ceiling. The large first floor space may be less appealing to developers now due to the high value of commercial property and the desire to have the maximum number of floors in the building. Staff finds that as proposed, with the absence of any alignment between the new building and neighboring structures, that the new building does not contribute to the historic streetscape much more than it does in its current condition. Staff recommends a restudy of the following elements. The first floor level fenestration should be revised to be the same height as that of the Sportstalker and Aspen Drug. A recommended solution for dealing with the floor height issue is to pull back the second level floor structure as far as possible on the inside of the building. A similar solution can be seen at Boogie's, Les Chef's, and the south wall of City Hall. Upper level fenestration should align with or be compatible with that of Sportstalker, to the extent possible. Aspen's 19th century commercial buildings all feature a strong cornice line. This should be reflected in the proposed building, not by using an ornate Victorian cornice, but possibly through a change in materials, brick color, etc. (The cornice need not align with that of the Sportstalker- this building may be taller if desired). In addition, the "pop-top" is not consistent with the typical box form of Aspen's commercial buildings. 2 .. The storefront is very important in establishing a rhythm along the street. Staff recommends that the entry door be centered and slightly recessed, both because that is typical along the mall and because the front door should be set off from the entry into the stairwell. The proposed stairwell on the west end of the street facade is apparently due to a code concern. Staff recommends study of a different solution and elimination of this stair. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: This remodel has the potential to significantly strengthen the character of this side of the block and the mall in general. The changes recommended above are directed at consistency with the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal does not affect the historic significance of any adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Because the Commercial Core is a historic district, recognition of, and reflection of established architectural patterns is important to the preservation of the architectural character of the area. Residential Design Checklist Ordinance #30 applies to all residential development in the City of Aspen, including mixed use projects. This project is in conflict with several elements of Ordinance #30, namely, building orientation (requires a street oriented entrance and principal window), building elements (requires a one story element at least 20% of the width of the facade), build to lines, and primary mass. Staff recommends that HPC waive these standards because the units do not have a direct relationship to the pedestrian streetscape. 3 .. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC table the application with the following direction to the applicant: 1. The first floor level fenestration shall be revised to be the same height as that of the Sportstalker and Aspen Drug. 2. Upper level fenestration should align with or be compatible with that of Sportstalker, to the extent possible. 3. Create a stronger cornice element. 4. Eliminate the roof "pop-top." 5. Center the entrance door. 6. Eliminate the new stair on the street elevation. 7. HPC hereby waives Ordinance #30 design review standards, except for those dealing with FAR issues. 4 0 0 . APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL REVI EW HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 4 1 0-9(. .... ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Preject name 426 E. Hyman Building 2. Project location 426 E. Hyman Avenue, Aspen Lot P Blk 88 City of.Aspen (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning CC 4. Lot size 3000 sf 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number L and M Properties 410 E. Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 925-3315 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Dick Fallin Baker Fallin Assoc., Inc. 1280 Ute Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA x Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin . Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) One structure, 3 story with basement Bsmt : Bar 1st Flr : Retail 2nd Flr.: Office 3rd Flr : Apartments (1) 2 Bedroom, (2) Studio 9 Description of development applicationjlpmndel existing non-conforming three story building by creating a new South front on the Hyman Avenue Mall. Modify existing roof over the 2 bedroom apt. add handicapped access elevators for Bsmt, 1st & 2nd floors. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1 - Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments 4 and 5 ....-I . ... 11111111 lili . 0 . . ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: L and M Properties Address: 426 E. Hyman Avenue - Zone district: CC Lot size: 3000 s.f. Existing FAR: Bldg = 6064.5 sf Decks/Stairs = 1417.0 bf Allowable FAR: Bldg = 1.5-1 = 4500 sf Decks/Stair 675 sf Rroposed FAR: Bldg = 6064.5 sf Decks/Stairs = 41-80 sf 14ll,0..~ 3864 Existing net leasable (commercial) Bsmt = -2*86 s f lst=22*4 s f 2nd=1â€¢*~0- s f44-0 Proposed net leasable (commercial): Bsmt = $89-1 sf ist=22*6 sf 2nd=1165 sf344 11 20 15 2 1 = .3150 Existing % of site coverage: A.3 % 0 - Proposed % of site coverage: -10 3 9 a > - Existing % of open space: 0.0% Proposed % of open space: 0.0% Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 2.?.' -0" Accesory blda. N/A .6 - & Proposed max. height: Principal blda: -4AQ:.8â€ž Accessory bldg: N /8 Proposed % of demolition: Bsmt= 1st= 2nd= 3rd= Existing number of bedrooms: three Proposed number of bedrooms: three Existing on-site parking spaces: . -0- On-site parking spaces required: -0- nonconforming Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: -0- Front: -0- Front: -0- Rear: -0- Rear: -0- Rear: -0- Combined Combined Combined Fronurear: -0- Front/rear: -n- Front/rear: -0- Side: -0- Side: -O- Side: -0- Side: -0- Side: -O- Side: -0- Combined Combined Combined Sides: -0- Sides: -0- Sides: -0- Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Parking, open spare. F.A.R.. Rlley fnern,rhmpnt VaMations requested: (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O , zone districts) # Â·Â·Ul I \ 'a \ ~.,1 i 1 5 \ N - .Â» U i (74 / 1/ 14 0 U =14'A.==1 B E.BESEE 04 . 0-4 1 pah 14 .. 1533263%11-ip=9-1-5~8 0 P. 1.I.. 14 \1/1 ->BEEBEEGOEBFRa . 9 -<4-EffilialiEFEEBIEEEd..4â‚¬E9 X_.~/ t-_.. 94't 896* f / ~ tit! 89 t=fl- e,5. O /- 02 41Â£651:=d __ : Â· .N3*491, ~. HERE 4\ t (f - 72.%3 :..<\ -AZ \ ) 14 C < i L 3 Al , 0 . . /41# 1 f - ---'--4.- a- -- .. + i -1,/ , / * 1 - \ e *0 - 24 L IdÂ·: i / *00 . . -5 v ' 4 \ 2 1 *. j 4.,1 034, 4 tg/ .- ...CS*:2 . 14 Â£ .\ %6 / h.,fi ,\, ; 4 i t.' --%-* f. -17 I ~ tÂ»53Â»65Zm 4 V -410 5. AY hAA ht 4 .-- - *093 Â¥\ I -0 -I 0 0 0 Application for Conceptual Review Historic Preservation Commission for 426 E. Hyman Avenue Building Aspen, Colorado April 1, 1996 Attachment 4 1. Concentual selection of maior building materials North Elevation (Alley)- Existing materials consist of brick veneer and wood siding. these materials will be used on new elements of the building. South Elevation (Mall) New facade at the first and second floor levels will be primarily brick veneer with stone trim with wood trim features. The third floor facade elements will be principally painted wood. 2. Written description The applicant, L and M Properties, are the holders of a new 20 year lease on the structure located on Lot P Blk 88 City of Aspen. The owners of the property, Loma Alta Corporation, conditioned the lease on certain physical improvements to this building that include a new 2-story brick facade. The existing building is non-conforming in terms of open space, parking and FAR and the intent is to not exceed the existing total FAR totals. In order to create a new two story facade, the existing second floor will move forward approximately 14-feet south; which in effect would increase the floor area. This increase is one of several increases throughout the building regarding stair enclosures and alterations that will be taken away - from the second floor area, i.e., the net effect is no change in the existing building FAR and a reduction in the stair/deck tabulations, by creating a two story space at the first floor as shown on the enclosed drawing. The third floor consists of two existing studio apartments and one two bedroom apartment. The applicant intends to renovate the interiors of the two studio units, and to create a new roof and interior layout within the existing floor plan of the two bedroom unit. ._ i' e Â¥ ... The building is within the Historic Overlay District. but has no historic designation. The building was constructed in 1969-1970 and exhibits characteristics of that year in that there is little or no historical reference to the older buildings on the mall. The new design attempts to correct this deficiency by the use of brick, stone and proportion as recommended in the guidelines. The second floor aligns with the second floor of the adjacent building along the west side, Lot 0, Blk 88, but the Sportstalker Building to the East on Lot Q, Blk 88, has its second floor one-half level higher. The 426 Building shares the main stair exits at the mall and alley with the Sportstalker building which fixes the stairs and exits to their existing locations. This creates a design problem for window alignments and connecting architectural elements between these two buildings. - 0 kÂ·. .. 0 0 0 0 l -- 7- 1--t # ilittinÂ£ Ilitilf 1~1#~U U_f :, I =====r== 1 . .1 - - '1 ..1 -1 = 1 I ./ f 11 1 . 1 - 1 0 Â· - i . 1 - 1 1 p 1 1 f : , 1 1 6 f - - 11. 1 1 1 1 11 , 1 1 - - .----- - -- 1 - - . 1 1 ; i 1 - . r 1! 1 -a 1 ! . i I 1 1 1 0 1 1 - 1- .-, 11. 1 1 -T I ... 7. 1 1 -- 11 1 11 1 1 1 />r-- - I 1.. 7 -- 1 . EXISTING MALL ELEVATION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING . I. I -' .... '1 1 - - 11 1 - F - > 1- -- , V.--- 1 i ' px. I h + - ----: 1 L 4 1-- 1- Â· i. - 74 4 -- - - E--44 J '4 1 1 .-v i - - ~ N:*64 C\\4 r 7 -1.-2 - 11 / -- 1; -.. ~. .dj>L~T 1 . 1 - 1 -tijat- + - 1, . 7 700 0 0 0 i <mi Cnn 1, 1 - e.--1 J -- ~1 -- 1 - -- I 1 11 . - - /Th BASEMENT EXISTING ~ 428 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 1 . ... - 0 . , 0 4 SPOFT,~~-Â»4 WEA- 85Â£-02. , . 1 -/d- P. - 1 =mt r=1 t w' --1/0 - - 0 - 0 . 1 h FIRST FLOOR EXISTING 41/ 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 140 01-H -252'" _-: .... ! , -yzrv-5 T-AL-,<Et HALJ_ . Â· =4 Ve -7 '1.. Â·_J 1 --.94-ZI_ +~F -=~Â«If =1 :f â€ž17,r/ - 1 =I 4, - 1 1 U-flitÂ« 1 7 1 , -r:~ i 1 . Â· r r -11 r--' ' 1---_~ 1 -1 03 1 - 2254. P. ~ 15Â¤:82-~= -.1-- E- i . rn ~COND FLOOR EXISTING KL,/ 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING NolrnÂ·1 - -. -- . 0 0 . i. 1 - St-Â¢&,541-,75*,~2!â€žL AtiALL. C Z ~ FC+e~ - 11 -I - f 1 . T . , tÂ¥2*un_ - I-- 11 < 0 1 911,40 AFF --- 1, -8EORKM_Apl; --= i< N =1 .1/ 71, , i I 111 -:T--flit, . .tplâ‚¬Â» _ 4-l I ,====-1 t . i I i - 01 Â¢ 2 -cE 9 4 ' <1' 1 4L=r ------ - - i i 1+ -27 14\1 1/9 FÂ£Â£Â£,it) 1 , Ir 111 1 -1 1 1~4. 1 4 1 950.20 AVE - 1 4-Pl . . F . 1 - -. - I 1 - I 1 - 2-#<:- 1 il I /~~h THIRD FLOOR EXISTING P. .. KI-2 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING Maknt- . .... - 40 921 - 6- - 'A / - - 1 Â· t-- i, 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 i Â· j k--1 \ 5740/0 607- ' ..1 1 :-1 , . l 1 1 11 . t- 11 J -0 . 1, 11 , 1 ,%>\ 1 - ,, -- 0,9,=>ce . , 0,cgc;,c~ ~ ly,./+r--- -- - 5.FIE-LAâ€¢i t. . -- 11 . . 1 , 1 'r i - 1 /.22.,7.70,4.C,/9, -4 2 - ---- + 4- 1 I Â· _ 41 ' -- TMA (-C- 545Ee*/7- 1 1 1 11 f. EXISTING SECTION LOOKING EAST 426 EA~T HYMAN BUILDING .... - 7241;UCCUL'-2, ..â€ž .â€¢ â€¢â€¢ /4 '' ' B -. , - -- 1 - i --------0--------rb - -i -1- - - -- - - - --~- - - ~I - M - - - / 1 1 . 1 /1 1 -1- . T. 1. , =====: 1 i w 1 -r ! 77 r==r . It M| il 1 IIi Â·1 -- 1 . El 11 11 - 1 I * 1 1 9 1 1, 11 1, - 11 H. . -1 - .-- . -I'..-= -C==9 1, . 1 -- i 0 . 1 - , 1.- 4 . 1 . 1-. . 1 1 --- - - -- - 1 - -- 1 - 1 1 4 - 1 - 1 . . :1 - i 11; , It. 4 = 1 , . 11 , di. 1 i- 2- 0 ! 1,1 1 1:-442-GÂ· .t - , 1 I '. - $ 5 Â·i. . 1. L.07 0 - t,0,1 r Â· - uor <R 2 1 --. 1 . r t i J 1 /1 L - Fia E~ i 1 . . 1 1 1 ' PROPOSED MALL ELEVATION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING * I . 4 gy/7 POLÂ¥W - 11 4111 i , gr,n Nojvw -, -- A .... '. Â·1 ly 1 a r-- --- --- -- 1 1 11, r.. i-r44 I - - Â£ 1 It li 1 1. ! 1 . 2 - r , Iii i 11, ~ i , 4 .. It li .1/ 1 :1- illi' li il j '' i 1 1.11 30-1 r r 1 4 6 1 I . 1. - f - Ir------T- 7---11- - - , J - -11-'. 1-1 1-1~ n. 1. ./ 1 lili , 1.--J il 11 11 , , ' .... /,1 , r-- r--1 1 . - 1 . . .1 - - ---- - -I - 68/kib/ALLK,ZAe/*- -1 1 1 .1 1 1 ! rr----ri 1 r...1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 ' 11 ji i! 1 G.-4 4-4 1 . 1 1 ,. -LOT- 2 - -1 - Z .7 7 2.- -=72-_1:.39 -7-726971 2-S 7-_-Z-722&irr 3 -i_T-Ti-1- -7 ~----- -- PROPOSED MALL ELEVATION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING ~ A,Wrivy LAe i F ~ - .-1, %Â·93 1 --, 7/% .. 0 . 0 - 0 d 11 1 t 1 '' . 1 . h I ; 1 - f % Iii : L 1 414 Â· 7,4- Â· 1' 1 1 f 11--1 11 +To<+Dr- -- , . 1 i \. ./ 1 i /L- 1 *.Ll - m- GLE'/ill~-i=*==- . - Ek- - -1:r 4 --7 - - - 07 i V-.1 Fem~ 1 - Â· 1 + i , \4 - - ~11'OW 0 j 1 , 1 - 5<2 , b /, i I 1 1 1 j 1 1 1. a - : - 1 -1 1 i 11 U ! 1 '. i C t. 21 i 1 - Â© BASEMENT PROPOSED 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING HogTH - . . 0 . . 1 - 1 1 , \ 1 1 1 - RAMP L 1 1 1 -1 , Hf .0 /, 1 1 4 4 191 1- --11 4. 41 1 1 - -. -1/4 . 1 -4- 141 - . 1 . b i I ./--' ' 0 ' 1 1 1 11 i 1 --- 1 1 1 I 1 -4- 1 1.1 jl< - - i up-J If_. C,et. . El 6 , j<-*Z>5~-2309--f-V -- E, -i E-EnC.li -1"vA"'vcfu-_ 7- 1 6- 4. 1 Oh,FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED 7 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING Aa.4 - ... 1 4 r= - 11 11 1 - - 1, - -T- 1, . 47 6Ft:*ler.37:41,lia. -Hkâ€¢L, 2 (2 22 *La,2. 1 '1 ' ~ . 11. 11 . 1. - 1 \, IRS -1-1 / 1 F: - -/EN \* - 4 20,4 1./ 1 \ 1. T 1.1-- 1 4 - - \ 1 1 :.1, - Mr . E f T+4 1\ 4 .l > 1 1. 1 --} 1 1 1 1 i. 447. - 1 -./.-0 I . - Â£02 . -1 -2 -24 ) 1 1 1 : 0 1 RErâ€¢16,-__22 - \ , er - r-/ 1 1 N 1 .P OPP". -21 -1 1 1 /4 - . 1 , AOF 1 1 INkr--1 It , 11 1 l- 1 1 1 . !1 -11 .1- '91- Flic-7.1 -_-- 1 fi- -1- .i .C 1 ' 1 - , _&*a. 09 Â»,-J 6 ~MT 7 /5Â¥1___ _ wt 46, STÂ»rIA #i Â»A# - ir 14 1 /Th SECOND FLOOR PROPOSED KL,/ 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING .. 140*TH - .... Se':-73 7>u.*:ER..0 ,Â¥* u_ e Â·20 g- Agi 1. 1 - . ff P. Â¢ 1 '1 . -i 1 I - STUD/O +Pr, r -PA -1 J - 214 1 $-- r: - 1 A Alt.. - 2 Â· 21ez>gÂ£Â» /1/\ /~0:77 - 2-FOOF 1 mul - - 1 87244>M)\1 C - UP=CA 1 -1 - l' rl 1 - hil f I 17~0,5Â¥=1 -,SaLbul ~ ~ - 11 1 - guoto-<,Pr, . 1 -&22* h .IJ- 1 1 D 1â€ž li 21\ THIRD FLOOR PROPOSED ~_j 420 EAST HYMAN BUILDING - OliTA _- . ...... Jo' MT. LIMIT 1. .9 .-/ 7 ff-' 4 i /1 -tk~<65 --- ....- --- --- ---- I i 1, 69 RO P>K. 9:rus,o ref - ryril, 9-1/2 +~P.C 11 11 - 1 --.. - - - : JI r----- - ~ | 1-- - | IH- \1_ uve-OF - \ \ _ (21'r Sy,6 ""i.0,0, . _-- 1 - 1 - _ - - Â» li - -/ 1 11 1 -- f - LfAUP= 0'~ 8kal-Q ag- I 229 -FLa- 11 , , - F 11 --- --- - - 1 il It - - kE'TkIL- 29:_- I. ! I. ; i \ ler n,2. 1. i - i \ 1 PROPOSED SECTION LOOKING EAST 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING . 1 1 ti ' -- 4 . Fl _ â€¢ 7-/6 1 ' . 11 37... r b ~L Â£* 4.--0 L_:C 11 --1 - f 1 - 1 1 1 .-....... 0, . 1 -- . P=22 2 . - L.- , _ _3 4 ' |h _ M -2205 C ve 4 1 \O 1 . 1-- i. 11 - 4. , '1 ... 1 71 4 1 1...a T t.0 i -- - 1/h.r.-It.R . - 0 13 N Il 'Â¤ -F \r.-4 L-4 -Inf E-- - -I ....../.- I.../.-I- ....I- 17= -3 28 _-1 < A L._l 1-, ~- = TU_ 1 - 1,1 2 f - . r l tiL L 1 . T~L -01212022Â£$1.4#w2L1,2*625 3 7.2,-2-fl 1 c ~ - 5. Ill - wi n n Â» 0 1/ul 1/0 2 1- 1 - 1 - 1knlt 11. 41 ' 411-Ut F./ f 1 ) 7 -,?,1 'f*%*f. | 99 4 , in' 4 f 1 -Miry -----~ ~-- -1 - 1 .1 -- 1 . 2_ JUBLIC NOTICE DATE AFR TIME 5 r f PLACE .'ITY MA-L PURPOSE 4-1 1.' 'f .At' â€¢4Â· 041â€¢1 4 Tj>F.M. Dâ‚¬ Â£â‚¬6 0 16<Â· 85Â· r., 42<, E HT?,p.. AL. 4.: : a"Y -0/-=7,1.77~ - ' :â€¢ â‚¬ .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 426 E. HYMAN AVENUE, CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 10, 1996, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in the Sister Cities Meeting Room, Basement of City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider a proposal submitted by LOMA-ALTA Corp., requesting conceptual development approval for a remodel of the existing building, including changes to the street facing facade. The property is located at 426 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot P, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO. 920-5096. s/ Jake Vickerv, Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on March 22, 1996. City of Aspen account. T* (6}T(26 - C - i-0 1-t-98 14994 l L (6224 F::92 8,1/06-Ld- 0Â«6563 4vÂ»5 1/1'1*05 1/4 #SLGE 19 i l 9 4 k C EArtaz_ f*l-- l-,0 J ~ST,LE - .. Parcels within a 300' radius of 2737-073-39-010 for' DICK Fallin. Record TR SEQ SUB ID MSTREL//SCHED NAME 1 2737 073 30 006 001037 Aspen 3 2737 073 30 009 008771 Aspen 4 2737 073 30 851 ******* Fire Station 6 2737 073 30 852 ******* City of Aspen 7 2737 073 30 007 001124 Aspen 8 2737 073 29 009 001433 Aspen 9 2737 073 38 004 001434 Aspen 10 2737 073 31 851 ******* City Hall 11 2737 073 81 001 015075 Collins Block 12 2737 073 81 002 015076 Collins Block 13 2737 073 81 003 015077 Collins Block 14 2737 073 81 004 015078 Collins Block 15 2737 073 81 005 015079 Collins Block 16 2737 073 39 002 000179 Aspen 17 2737 073 81 006 015080 Collins Block 18 2737 073 81 007 015081 Collins Block 19 2737 073 81 009 015083 Collins Block 20 2737 073 81 008 015082 Collins Block 21 2737 073 81 010 015084 Collins Block 22 2737 073 46 001 013477 Brand Building 23 2737 073 81 011 015085 Collins Block 24 2737 073 46 002 013478 Brand Building 25 2737 073 81 012 015086 Collins Block 26 2737 073 81 013 015087 Collins Block 27 2737 073 46 003 013479 Brand Building 28 2737 073 81 014 015088 Collins Block 29 2737 073 46 004 013480 Brand Building 30 2737 073 81 015 015089 Collins Block 31 2737 073 46 008 013484 Brand Building 32 2737 073 38 851 ******* Wheeler Opera House 33 2737 073 39 014 001137 Aspen 34 2737 073 46 007 013483 Brand Building 35 2737 073 46 006 013482 Brand Building 36 2737 073 46 005 013481 Brand Building 37 2737 073 40 001 000659 Aspen 38 2737 073 46 009 013485 Brand Building 39 2737 073 81 016 015090 Collins Block 40 2737 073 46 010 013486 Brand Building 41 2737 073 81 017 015091 Collins Block 42 2737 073 46 011 013487 Brand Building 43 2737 073 81 018 015092 Collins Block 44 2737 073 43 001 010556 Tom Thumb Building 45 2737 073 46 012 013488 Brand Building 46 2737 073 40 003 001038 Aspen 47 2737 073 43 002 010557 Tom Thumb Building 48 2737 073 46 016 013492 Brand Building 49 2737 073 81 019 015093 Collins Block 50 2737 073 43 003 010558 Tom Thumb Building 51 2737 073 46 015 013491 Brand Building 52 2737 073 43 004 010559 Tom Thumb Building 53 2737 073 38 901 015119 Bentley's Possessory Int. 54 2737 073 39 008 000596 Aspen 55 2737 073 46 014 013490 Brand Building 56 2737 073 43 708 010563 Tom Thumb Building 57 2737 073 46 013 013489 Brand Building 58 2737 073 43 707 010562 Tom Thumb Building 59 2737 073 43 706 010561 Tom Thumb Building .. 60 2737 073 39 01 0iu123 Duvike 61 2737 073 43 005 010560 Tom Thumb Building 62 2737 073 39 022 010124 Duvike 63 2737 073 39 010 000469 Aspen 64 2737 073 43 009 010564 Tom Thumb Building 65 2737 073 39 011 000470 Aspen 66 2737 073 43 010 010565 Tom Thumb Building 67 2737 073 39 024 010126 Duvike 68 2737 073 43 011 010566 Tom Thumb Building 69 2737 073 39 012 001257 Aspen 70 2737 073 39 023 010125 Duvike 71 2737 073 43 012 010567 Tom Thumb Building 72 2737 073 43 016 012998 Tom Thumb Building 73 2737 073 43 015 010570 Tom Thumb Building 74 2737 073 39 025 010127 Duvike 75 2737 073 43 014 010569 Tom Thumb Building 76 2737 073 39 013 001475 Aspen 77 2737 073 39 026 010128 Duvike 78 2737 073 43 013 010568 Tom Thumb Building 79 2737 182 13 003 015185 B.P.O.E. 80 2737 073 39 020 010122 Duvike 81 2737 073 39 027 010129 Duvike 82 2737 182 13 004 015186 B.P.O.E. 83 2737 182 13 002 000518 Aspen 84 2737 182 15 001 010696 Pitkin Center 85 2737 182 17 002 000881 Aspen 86 2737 182 17 003 000084 Aspen Commercial 87 2737 182 13 005 015187 B.P.O.E. 88 2737 182 24 422 ******* Aspen 89 2737 182 13 801 ******* B.P.O.E. 90 2737 182 17 004 000085 Aspen Commercial 91 2737 182 16 001 001256 Aspen 92 2737 182 16 002 000013 Aspen 93 2737 182 16 004 001473 Aspen 94 2737 182 16 005 000568 Aspen 95 2737 182 16 006 000539 Aspen 96 2737 182 16 012 000233 Roaring Fork 97 2737 182 17 005 000086 Aspen Commercial 98 2737 182 16 015 001096 Roaring Fork Arms 99 2737 182 16 016 001105 Roaring Fork Arms 100 2737 182 16 017 001174 Roaring Fork Arms 101 2737 182 16 018 000059 Roaring Fork Arms 102 2737 182 16 007 000493 Aspen 103 2737 182 16 022 001355 Roaring Fork Arms 104 2737 182 16 013 000690 Roaring Fork 105 2737 182 16 003 001041 Aspen 106 2737 182 16 021 000393 Roaring Fork Arms 107 2737 182 16 020 000371 Roaring Fork Arms 108 2737 182 16 019 001170 Roaring Fork Arms 109 2737 182 16 024 000209 Roaring Fork Arms 110 2737 182 16 025 001340 Roaring Fork Arms 111 2737 182 16 026 000754 Roaring Fork Arms 112 2737 182 16 027 000772 Roaring Fork Arms 113 2737 182 16 014 001106 Roaring Fork 114 2737 182 24 001 000025 Aspen 115 2737 182 20 851 ******* Wagner Park 116 2737 182 16 031 000955 Roaring Fork Arms 117 2737 182 16 030 001111 Roaring Fork Arms 118 2737 182 16 029 000369 Roaring Fork Arms 119 2737 182 16 028 000658 Roaring Fork Arms .. 120 2737 182 16 032 ~082 Roaring ForK Arms 121 2737 182 97 001 011412 Golden Horn Building 122 2737 182 97 002 011413 Golden Horn Building 123 2737 182 16 033 000691 Roaring Fork Arms 124 2737 182 16 034 000774 Roaring Fork Arms 125 2737 182 16 009 000056 Aspen 126 2737 182 24 002 001311 Aspen 127 2737 182 16 035 000773' Roaring Fork Arms 128 2737 182 16 518 000657 Roaring Fork Arms 129 2737 182 16 061 009678 Red Onion 130 2737 182 16 062 009679 Red Onion 131 2737 182 97 004 011415 Golden Horn Building 132 2737 182 16 064 009680% Red Onion 133 2737 182 16 011 000135 Aspen 134 2737 182 97 003 011414 Golden Horn Building 135 2737 182 16 063 009681 Red Onion 136 2737 182 16 065 011097 Red Onion 137 2737 182 16 066 011098 Red Onion 138 2737 182 24 009 009027 Aspen 139 2737 182 16 068 011100 Red Onion 140 2737 182 16 067 011099 Red Onion 142 2737 182 24 006 001390 Aspen bvvlf E //6/ c ~ ~ A COLO . ~3 ENERAL ~ TNFRSHIP , f'., .. ij â€¢ Elly 9,7-10 ASPEN, co 81612 . 4 4 WENDELIN ASSOCIATES â€ž LII\IZA, DOMINIC ~ A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP ! ' LINZA, KATHRYN A. 150 METRO PARK 1 408 E HOPKINS AVE ROCHESTER, NY 14623 ASPEN CO 81611 . ELKS LODGE 224 - M & W ASSOCIATES A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 210 S GALENA ST STE 21 205 SOUTH MILL STREET ASPEN CO 81611 CO 81611 . 1, ASPEN, DUVIKE, INC. RYANCO PARTNERS LTD NO XVI ~ A COLO. GENERAL. PARTNERSHIP f~ SMITH PAT ATTN: BOX 2238 715 W MAIN ST ASPEN, co 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 DUVIKE, INC. BANK OF ASPEN A COLO. GENERAL PARTNERSHIP ~ AUTAX, INC. -C/O BOX 2238 FO BOX 2798 ASPEN, CO 81612 LITTLETON CO 80161 ELKS LODGE 224 MILL STREET PLAZA ASSOCIATES, . A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 205 S. MILL ST.; SUITE 301A 210 S GALENA ST STE 21 ' 13 ASPEN co 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MASON & MORSE, INC. , BALDWIN HARLEY 514 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 205 S GALENA ASPEN, co 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 . BALDWIN HARLEY SJA ASSOCIATES LTD 0 41 PO BOX 1709 205 S GALENA ASPEN co 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 â€¢ e 81 WHEELER SQUARE ASSOCIATES, INC. BALDWIN HARLEY C/O THE DONALD J. FLEISHER COMPANY -1 200 EAST MAIN STREET 205 S SALENA ASPEN CO 81611 ,, COMCOWICH, WILLIAM L. BALDWIN HARLEY ~ TRUSTEE OF ROBERT BARNARD TRUST 1 420 WEST MAIN STREET 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 CO 81611 ASPEN -L_11 BAL.DWIN HARLEY ELI <S LODGE 224Â· 0 41 210 S GALENA ST STE 21 205 S SALENA ASPEN co 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 0 4. COMCOWICH, WILLIAM L. *, KAI\IDYCOM, INC. ~ TRUSTEE OF ROBERT BARNARD TRUST 420 WEST MAIN STREET 766 SINGING WOOD DR , ASPEN, co 81611 ARCADIA CA 91006 LINDNER FRITZ BALDWIN HARLEY ~ LINDNER ERIKA 1 3170 E MOON SPIRIT PL 205 S GALENA TUCSON AZ 85718-1388 ASPEN CO 81611 0 4, KOPP AMELIA L UND 59.74% INT BALDWIN HARLEY ~ ZUPANCIS ROBERT L UND 20.13% INT ~ 31425 HWY 82 205 S GALENA ASPEN co 81611 6, ASPEN Co 81611 .. ~ U'Ur".I[f T J -*AUAL'i T, milti'~01 7 U- lyl -1'7PTZET-r'- 76.yiJLFAEIn.i.Al.LL..~ 2 .- =1_..Â· 0-_.. . 61"30Â·17-U ,-71 8161 IL~ ~ L ./ - 4, AS//01 d.60 81611 BIRKWOOD ASSOCIATES BALDWIN HARLEY ~ A COLORADO F'ARTNEIRSHIF' 1 '03 F'.0â€ž BOX 3421 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 0 10 GRIFFITH, ANGELINE M. BALDWIN HARLEY 0 , / 7 530 WALNUT STREET 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 . GOLDSTEIN, ALAN J. ~ 0/0 GOLDSTEIN MANAGEMENT , I BALDWIN HARLEY 150 METTRO PARK #2 205 S GALENA ROSCHESTER, NY 14623 ASPEN CO 81611 . CARLSON, BRUCE E. BALDWIN HARLEY A II ~ CARLSON, BETJE C. , ) P.O. BOX 3587 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 . COMCOWICH, WILLIAM L. BALDWIN HARLEY ~ TRUSTEE OF ROBERT BARNARD TRUST . r. 420 WEST MAIN STREET 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. BALDWIN HARLEY A II . 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE , 205 S GALENA ASPEN, co 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 . KOUTSOUBOS TED A BALDWIN HARLEY 0 '' 419 E HYMAN AVE 205 S GALENA ASPEN co 81611 ACPFN CO 81611 . 1-Â·Â·I .J KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. BALDWIN HARLEY 0 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 205 S GALENA ASPEN, co 81611 ASPEN co 81611 0 4, KOUTSOUBOS, THEODORE A. 0 .D BALDWIN HARLEY A II 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 . ASPEN CO 81611 COX JAMES E ~ COX NANCY .D BALDWIN HARLEY 3284 SURMONT 205 S GALENA ~ LAFAYETTE CA 94549 .. ASPEN CO 81611 KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. 0 0. BALDWIN HARLEY A II 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 .. ASPEN CO 81611 CARLSON, BRUCE E. BALDWIN HARLEY . e. P.O. BOX 3587 205 S GALENA ASPEN, co 81612 co 81611 ... ASPEN B & K ASSOCIATES ~ A COLORADO GEI\IERAL PARTNERSI-Â·1 IP .. BALDWIN HARLEY 308 SOUTH MILL STREET 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN co 81611 0 0. FOUTROUBOS TED A. A #. BALDWIN HARLEY A II LOUIE;OUBUS, TED A. .. .~. .D. HARLEY A II 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 909 0 t... GALINA ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 . e. KOUTSOUBOS, TED SABBATINT GPORT, INC. ~ ~ A coLâ€žORAI~OCORPORATION 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 230 SOUTH MILL STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 ... ASPEN, CO 81611 KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. BALDWIN HARLEY A II ... 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 ... KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. BALDWIN HARLEY A II ... 419 E HYMAN AVE 205 S GALENA ASPEN Co 81611 ... ASPEN CO 81611 KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. BALDWIN HARLEY A II ... 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 .. ASPEN CO 81611 KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. BULLOCK G E GRANDCHILDREN'S PTNRSI ~ ~ Bl.JI_I_OCK WE & DARIEN C/O SUZETTE I 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ' 7601 SCOTT HAMILTON DR ASPEN, CO 81612 .. LITTLE ROCK AR 72209 KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. 0. BALDWIN HARLEY A II 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 .. ASPEN CO 81611 RYANCO PARTNERS, LTD. ~ ATTN: PAT SMITH .. BALDWIN HARLEY 715 W MAIN ST 205 S GALENA , ASPEN CO 81611 .. ASPEN CO 81611 ARCADES ASSOCIATES LTD FRIEDMAN JACK ~ CLARK SMYTH CO THE C/O .. 200 E MAIN ST 24955 PACIFIC COAST HWY #B202 ASPEN CO 81611 . MALIBU CA 90265 KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. BALDWIN HARLEY 1 0. 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 1 ASPEN CO 81611 .. KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. BALDWIN HARLEY A II .. 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 1 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN co 81611 ,.. KOUTSOUBOS, TED .. BALDWIN HARLEY 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ' 205 S GALENA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN co 81611 .. KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. WENDELIN ASSOCIATES 0. A NEW YORK GENERAL, PARTNERSHIP8 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 150 METRO PARK ASPEN, CO 81611 .. ROCHESTER, NY 14623 KOUTSOUBOS, TED A. ,.. BALDWIN HARLEY A II 419 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 205 S GALENA j ASPEN, 00 Â¤1611 A C? 1-3, !77 h I co 01611 ~3 0 N <0 w 1N UES rt) /La TOIN,Â·....1 0 0 J . r : ... 1- 1 C. / 4.1 CHARLES C/O .. ' ' 9 E (JOOPI:R 2(.)~ ~NA , 1 <3 PEN CO 81611 ASPEN Co Â· 81611 .. GOLDEN HORN BUILDING LTD WENDELIN ASSOCIATES A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ~ A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 4947 150 METRO PARK ASPEN CO 81612 ROCHESTER, NY 14623 .. RED ONION INVESTORS 1 WHEELER WILLIAM W ISRAEL CHARLES C/O .. WHEELER INGRID J 3241 W DRY CREEK RD 418 E COOPER , ASPEN CO 81611 HELDSBURG ... It 95448 .1. BIDWELL BERT INVESTMENT CORPORATION 1 FOOTLOOSE MOCCASIN MAKERS, INC. .1. A COLORADO CORPORATION PO BOX 567 210 S. MILL STREET; SUITE 201 ASPEN CO 81612 . 1. ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDEN HORN BUILDING, LTD. .. BENTLEYS AT THE WHEELER A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 4947 ' PO BOX 10370 ASPEN, CO 81612 ~ ASPEN CO 81612 KAELIN STEFAN HAMPEL WALTER F JR .. 557 N MILL ST 290 HEATHER LN ASPEN co 81611 ASPEN Â«3 Pl,11 .. ROCKY MOUNTAIN EQUITY & r I BALDWIN HARLEY AII MORTGAGE COMPANY .. 418 E COOPER AVE 205 S GALENA ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 .. RED ONION INVESTORS KANTZER, T. MICHAEL ISRAEL CHARLES C/O .. 418 E COOPER 6501 VISTA DEL MAR ASPEN CO 81611 .. PLAYA DEL RAY, CA 90293 JEMISON LINDA H ULRYCH ANDRE . . J E 'VI I SON RICHARD H PO BOX 2202 1524 CANYON RD ASPEN co 81612 SANTA FE NM 87501 .. RED ONION INVESTORS DOLE, MARGARET M. ISRAEL CHARLES C/O .. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CEDARIDGE - C 418 E COOPER P.O. BOX 8455 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN co 81612 .. RED ONION INVESTORS MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES - 80B ISRAEL CHARLES C/O .. C/O HILLIS OF SNOWM SS 418 E COOPER 170 GARE CREEK DRIVE ASPEN CO 81611 VAIL, CO 81657 .. VOLK RICHARD W DUVIKE, INC. FLEISHER COMPANY C/O .. A COLOâ€ž GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 200 E MAIN ST BOX 2238 ASPEN co 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 .. WENDELIN ASSOCIATES ~ ~ A NEW YORK GENERAL. PARTNERSHIP 150 METRO PARK .. ROCHESTER, NY 14623 DUVIKE, INC. ~ ~ AC OLO. GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BOX 2238 ASPEN, CO 81612 ee LoMA Al T 4 Co a p 6210 NCHRTH CI IN IPAL_ EN. PRE. SUPH-A .. - DAI._LAS, ~ ~2(76 ASPEN ART INVESTMENT, LTD. A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR., #B rh ASPEN, CO 81611 - LOMA ALTA CORPORATION i POST OFFICE BOX 8105 DALLAS, TX 75205 ASPEN ART INVESTMENT, LTD. _ A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR. :14 B ASPEN co 81611 -- PRYMAK, BILL 1530 WEST lOTH. AVENUE BROOMFIELD, CO 80020 DENSON, DAVID & KATHLEEN 170 EAST GORE CREEK VAIL, co 81657 , ~ WHEELER BLOCK BUILDING LLC TKG MANAGEMENT INC C/O 1001 CHERRY ST STE 308 COLUMBIA MO 65201 DUVIKE, INC. A COLD. GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BOX 2238 ASPEN, co 81612 - DENSON, DAVID AND KATHLEEN 170 EAST GORE CREEK VAIL, CO 81657 KANTZER, T. MICHAEL 6501 VISTA DEL MAR PLAYA DEL REY, CA 90293 GOLDSTEIN,PETER GOLDSTEIN,ALAN 150 METRO PARK #2 ROCHESTER, NY 14623 DUVIKE, INC. A COLO. GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BOX 2238 - ASPEN, CO 81612 HILLIS OF SNOWMASS, INC. 170 EAST GORE CREEK VAIL, CO 81657 WOODS, RANSOM B. JR. .... WOODS, JUSTINE F. POST OFFICE BOX 12288 ASPEN, CO 81612 - 1, .11 1 . 1 .: 1 .Â·1 . A9/27/9 3 1 5: 15 f<,rc $25. 00 111'. 7 2.jiw, 120 .1 Â¥ SIJ,i.1 DaviÂ·.3, hi.lin (-int. f Cir,r'l' , Dr)(: $. 00 11 111!/1,/1/11/1/I!,IN \1'Â·'./1,11!!IÂ·.1!'1! 1Â·Â·\VIÂ·,1 111'l.(...:11!11".\1'1/Â·Ill 1!US IS. A '16,Â·tr '1'111"Â·Â·:: 11 Â·,1!11'ii'ff,ST(12'J !1'IA' 9, flit 11 "irliCOT,SEL '11(19:fl.C[(.0}451Â·Â·If,},IMI{N,[ Â·Â·1'.';"15 ' r.,-rÂ·Â·n /hi- In, I -,53 I 1 1, frit.,0 on TwirÂ·.4Â·r 5111,Â·t' , â€¢ I 2â€¢ I / .3 . h !111', 1)11,1,(11 Irl '.i Â·. .,nb 11,1. ./-.. .1â€ž ril d~~~' 141-~L 1 1 9. . bel....cel, LOMA ALTA. - . . :i CORPORATION /1. tili,irâ€¢.Â·.~Â·.y , .1) - 62.1.0 Nortli Central Expressway, Dellas, Texas .75206 .. 1 ''1'jic:!DEns r.'CA~r}(D' ob'f>'-.Ii-lijiur"I11'1t. i'<Pr,(8it2b'iiER:0:"JCM A'ND"YAORPORATED' j12%E.INÂ· Bl~'RE,r-R- : .t r:'I. 1 1 1,1,2 I're.~urTIVE PERCT-'AGES STATED THEREON, COLLECTIVELY CALLED i. .1 j L e U L , 1 i\ i L i 1 . 1~U J 1 L U 11ILI City ef Aspen Pitkin .1.1~ 1,1 / 11 r Lots P and Q, Block 88, and a contiguous strip of Lot R, Block 88, being 1 foot ': n in width on the street frantage and 25 feet in depth, all in the City and 4 Towns:to of Aspen d i I . - 8 A I "... ',i .426-428 East-Hyman Avenue :~ i .11'Ji !):~ IIi. 11 i 11 ..1 + _Aspen__. - 81611 \ 11 1 |~ 11 ropell> .1,|1'.'..1. 1.x,z~Â·ther uith ,t!] it..:TY,!irte,i:mie. 1!'r,â€¢i,er!,1 1 2 Nâ€žte. f)ther<)!,lic:Iiâ€žti. Secured 1111. 11.Â·Â·.ih,t 111:.11. rl~,111â€ž 4.cilriÂ· 1(, 1.endel. 1 Â·\ the relv.m,enn,1 Ilic i,i~le!,ted,ie. eudeti,ed!.> B..mer'. iii,te <Ni,le) ,]:11Â·4 - __ October 15__-__.. 9 -9.2_ .ill tile i | ~ punar.'I quu,4 _Eight_Million-Six Hund red_Ninety..Two -Tliousand__Two_U.und-ried_Eigb-to=-Eile j q 1, l',5, 11â€ž11.....,111, i.tere.1 â€žn the unp.1.1 rtÂ·in.,i.,! b.,i:ince tiom __...__ -_-9-C-topfir-_15.,---- . 14 _ik- . tintil paid. ut-,1... ~ r,,1. f .asset forth in said Notes VJ~ 0' 10,21.â€ž al'.5 5 1 CUJ 19 __ L .11:h p:.Inen[~ 1<, contintic until the entile 11,1,211!edne.% cvide-nÂ·(i kv 4:Ii,INâ€žtei. f'tillyp:tid:h â€ž,icÂ·.er it iâ€ž,t .citinerp:tid.theenti reprincip:11:,111<,unt , ,utht:indingmil:ic:niedintere:t th'212~,n. shallbed i: ind ~ 1 ..4.32 i r:i>able on January__15 4'12012 t 4- L 1 and ihirrowor A tâ€ž 1,:1>Â· 'â€ž 1.ender a I:itc ch.irge <11 1 N 01 an>Â· p.i>Â·ment not receiÂ·.ed by the Lender uÂ·ithin i ; i 5 - d:nÂ·. :itter pa>Â·menl i: due: ;ind il<irrouer 11.1. the right to prepay the principal amount (,utwnding under 4,iii! Nfite. in whole or in part. at any time withotit renalt>kneÂ·.71- il j B. the ra>ment â€ž'hill nther .win., uith int,reN Iliete n :11 0 ' i per annum. did itr4ed bv Lender ,| in :,Cli,rd.ince u ilh thi. Iked 1,1 1 111.1 1, protect IlitÂ· . curil,' i 1 thi. Deed â€ž1 1'111.1: and c che p.Â·11..rw.1,1.c â€¢,1 the cÂ·.Â·.eli:i:it..ind weretÂ·intÂ·nx i,1 Itâ€žrn,uer herent coni:ii,ied i 3. lillÂ·-. It,â€¢iwwn,iÂ·.eli.int. th:,1 11â€žrnâ€¢w,-,t,Â·.,:r..ind lia. 11Â· r,el,1[,iri.int :indâ€ž,:1â€¢.e> the Propeit'...iridâ€ž.irr:iii:.Iitle tothehaine, y reger.Â·ati[,11% :Â·11,! emen.Inth. 1 1- an>. :1~ 0f 11. d:lie.:.r r, . hubject to liner:11 leal :,tate taxe. ter the curre!,1 ,Â·al. e:â„¢em-ent. if recoid or in exi.tence. and recorded declarations, re:trictions, ~ 4. Pa>Â·meÂ·lit lit' Prindp:11,ind Inter:,t. IhirrnÂ·.vir +11:111 promplly pay when ilite the prine,pal 01 and intereg on Ilie indebledness rude need by Ilie Note. :11<1 1:,[e ch:irâ€ž v . rn,vided in Ihe Nnte :,iii Nhall tierl-orm .1.11 4, f Horn,uer'si,!her cmÂ·en.1:11 *contained in the Notc. 5. Applic:ition 11 Payment h. All p.iyment~ received 1-v [.ender under the terilis heret'f shall be applied b>Â· 1.ender fir~t in payment of ~ amount, due purv an 1 1,1 p:trap,raph 23 ( [:screw I und, fur T.tre, and lii 4urance), then 1,1 anioun[% dihhurhed by Lender pursuant to ~ p:ir:igraph 9 (Pnitection 011.ender-> Securit> ). :ind the b.11:ince in :ice<,rd:irce with the term, :ind emilitions orthe Note. $.1 11) 72-11-4-1. " 1 D "! 1 121 4 1 /â€žr i,i, 19../.fer -- 41,1.11 Â·, ~ Mr:/'firrlt't:blcV,iÂ·'> 1 'd'â€¢t'C!:Â·iÂ·%1.13,Â·ler.(-0>.':/2- ."' 292-2/)-- 11 92 2 1 , 2--1 0 0 e..b. .... L. C. *4942---rl,3415,Â·,~re.0,1~1 - 4.Â·0: ... - + r .:. I ./ p.. . b *#Â·f- 4.zhif~i: gi:~.sT,JÂ·2944-Â¢31:29#Wi.2~~.2~~~. Pi~i~:#P.LT..~Le.k:f~,~-13.-9Â»~â‚¬Â»At. 1*uu .L..23 Â·.,21;r at- i.trfzm fY A 4 *- A fr-7 Â»Â·-rÂ·, Â¢3# : 1 22: -l=. 1 ./ , 1 :.1 EXHIBIT "A" TO DEED OF TRUST DATED AUGUST -12- , 1993, BETWEEN LOMA ALTA CORPORATION, BORROWER, AND LENDER AS SHO. 3 HEREIN ON t. ti- * I fa Lender Name Payable At Date of Note Loan Amount Percentage < Â· 3937 Centenary 10-15Â·02 $2,288,229 26.32% Lisa Grace Ferguson 9-v '70'14 Dallas. 1,* IJLLJ f ..4 37.22Â°6 2 4, KatlinÂ·r Ferguson 3801 WentÂ·wood 10-15-92 3,234,996 c nillq: TX 75225 , U bl J Elise I.. Ferguson 7812 Boedecker 10-15-92 3.169.060 36.46% Dallas, TX 75225 $8,692,285 100 % Total 4 0.1 : 15159.09103 ilvia D-en Â·3, Pit Â· n 7 Ciar FÂ·, Doc ..- 0 61402 09/27/93 : â‚¬PSS~Â¥1Â£ 15,Ee - .. 1 11 1 0-liA--Atr/Y .1 CORPORATE INVESTMENTS - 40 87% 6210 NOMT-11 CENTRAL EXPRESSWAT DALLAS, TEXAS 75206 Â· 214/362,-526,1 FAX: (214) 368-2619 10: ASPEN TITLE CO. ATTENTION: Verna Mae FAX: (970) 9#0-4052 Please prepare an Abstract of Title for the property described as follows: Lot P, Block 88 City of Aspen commonly known as 426 East Hyman Deed recorded August 31, 1982, Book 431, Page 990 Pitkin County Records. Please send this Abstract of Title to: Planning Office City of Aspen 130 S. Galena StreeD Aspen, CO 81611 Charges for this service should be billed to Loma Alta Corp., P.O. Box 8105, Dallas, TX 75205. Please call or fax if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, ~;f* (3~~Uf fttett// Lovise Powers Vike President 24Â·C 7he Aspen limes â€¢ Sanmiooâ€¢&mdoy, Mi,rli~ 1996 .1 Mascots Public Notice I continued from page 23â‚¬ PUBLIC NOTICE 200' M required as measured trom the Highway Diego Chicken. By poking fun at umpires when he RE. HOWLING WOLF PARKING VARLANCE 82 right-of-way. lor the con,truction of a single they were forced to hire him back. wasn't taking Chaplinesque pratfalls at San Diego NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public family residence. Property Location: Lot 8, hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 10, Holland HIlls Subdlvl:lon Though marots make peanuts compared to pro- Padies baseball games, the Chicken (played by Ted 1994 81 a meeting to begin at 5Â·00 p.m, betore KAUWAN, ALEX: requesting approval for a fessional athletes, many squirrel away elephantine Giannoulis) showed that mascots can also be enter- the Sister CIties meeting room, balement of maximum 01 7227 square leet 13 allowed for a the Aspen Historic Preservitlon Commission In FAR varlance of 40 iquare feet where a salaries - up to six figures - for monkeying tainerS. City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, 1.364 acre lot in the R 30 zone district, for the around. Since then, no self-respecting mascot can walk by Howling Wolf requesting a waiver 01 lour on- lamlly reildence. Property Location: Lot I. to consider an application submitted by construction of an alrlock on an existing singleÂ· "We take pride in upping the ante on each other," a bald man without stopping to polish his head or fail site parking spaces to accommodate P.tlo Cheek Subdivision dining. The property 18 located at 316 E. Publlihed An The Aspen Times March 23,1996. says Bear, mascot for the NBA's Utah Jazz. "That's to filch a fan's bag o f popcorn and then spray it Hopkins Avenue [.ot 0. Block 80. CIty and why I tried to ski down the stairs." He made it to around the crowd as a getaway dash with a spread- Townslte of Aspen. For further Information, PUBUC NOTICE row M before taking a nasty spill and spraining his eagle collapse down the arena's stairs. Community Development Department, 130 S. County Commlisloners 01 Pitkin County, contact Amy Amldon at the Aspen/ Pltkin PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That the Board ol knee. "Goes with the territory," he says with mulish The Phoenix Gorilla, a former All-American Galena St., Aspen. CO (970) 920Â·5096 Colorado, at Its regular meeting on October 14. determination. "Next time, l'It make it." gymnast who burst on the scene in the late 1980s Aspen HIstork Preservation Commission following Resolution: Granting Approval of the s/Jake Vickery, Chal. after a duly-noticed public hearing, adopted the Most professional mascots are men in their mid- with his trampoline-propelled dunks, was the next Published In The Aspen Times March 23, 1996, Levl" 1041 Hazard Review with a Vested Property Right Pursuant to Title 24, Article 68, 20s or early 30s. Many are former gymnasts; others great mascot. His dazzling athleticism spawned a PUBUC NOTICE Colorado Revised Statutes Jeanette Jones. Deputy County Clerk cut their teeth performing for minor league teams or host of high-flying copycats. They also gained fame c:Urtn::,ZIM 2%:Mtz:~ly! publisheqlnl,leAspenT'm,Met!R:.1?9ft by playing Pluto or Goofy at Walt Disney World. and fortune at a cost of cracked backs, snapped Colorado, It its regular meeting on March 13. But not everyone is mascot material, says Glen shoulders and beken legs. 1 adopted the lollowin,Ordlnance: PLEASE TAKE NOTIer That the Board of 1996. and alter a duly-noticed public hearing, PURUC NOTICE Street, who played Harry the Horse for hockey's Cal- "We're going to keep pushing the envelope," ' c~~DW~3~'~NAP; Tg; B~'~R%~QO~~~~ ~C~mb=2:wre=4'ngnU~~~~1 gary Flames before founding Street Characters Inc., a says Utah's Bear. "There are incredible dunks and COLORADO ADOMING AMENDMENTS TO THE alter a duly-noticed public hearIng, adopted the Canadian company that conceives and trains stunts out there that no one has even imagined and LAND USE CODE To REQUIRE DEVELOPMENT following ResolutionÂ· Granting Exten,lon of mascots. that's what keeps us going, trying to reach that nex, INFORMATION IN A DIGITAL FORM FOR USE Creek Property Pu,mant to Title 24. Article 68. i APPLICATIONS TO SUBMIT CERTAIN Vested Properly Rights lor the Benedk*Hunter Introverts, he says, are best. "Guys who are the level." WITH THE CITY/COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC Colorado Revised Statutes life of the party don't need a costume to be wild and So while you're watching the NCAA basketba 1 Copies ol the lull text of the Ordinance are Published In The Aipen Ilmes March 23,1996. INFORMATION SYSTEM Jeanette Jone*. Deputy County Clerk crazy. But a lot of shy guys, given anonymity, will tournament, don't just look to the court for futu available lor public Inspectlon during regular try to get away with murder." stars of professional sport. Watch the guy in t e Recorder 530 E. Main St., Aipen, Colorado PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: Thal the Board 01 ollice hours In the ofllce 01 the Clerk and PUBIJC NOTICE Modern mascotry began in 1978 with the San funny suit. 81611. Phone: (970) 920-5180 County Commls,loner. ol Pitkin County, Jeenette Jones, Deputy County Cle,k Colorado, at Its repular meeting on Fet,ruuy 28, P ublished Inlhe Aspen TImes March 23,1996. 1996. atter a duly-noticed public hearing, adopted the following Resolution: PUBLIC NOTICE Granting an Exten,lon of Vested Real PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That the Board ol Property Rights for Roll International i County Commissioners of PltkIn County, Corporation Properly Pursuant to Title 24, "You do not merely want to be consideredjust the best of the best.1 1996. and after a duty-noticed public hearing Jelnene Joll, Deputy County Clerk Colorado, at Its regular meeting on March 13, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes adopted the following Ordinance: Published In The Aspen Tim- March 23,1996. }bu want to be considered the only ones who do what you do." RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY. PUBLIC NOTICE - Jerry Garcia of The Grateful Dead , Â· COLORADO GRANTING CONCEPTUAL RE: 426 E. HYMAN AVENUE. CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION APPROVAL OF THE RED BUTTE DEVE].OPMENT REVIEW , 1 RANCH SUBDMSN)N NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public Â· Copies 01 the lult text of the Ordinance are hearing will be hetd on Wednesday, April 10 ava~lable for public Inspection during re:ular 1996. al a meetlng to bealn at 5:00 p.m. be/ore ofllce hours In the oftlce of the Clerk and the Aipen Hlitork Preservation Commission In Recorder, 530 E. Main St., Upen, Colwado the Sister Cmes Meeting Room. Basement 01 - 81611. phone: (970)920-5180. CIty Hall 130 S. Galena Street. Aspen, Colorado. Jeanette Jones, Deputy County Clerk to con,]der a proposal submitted by LOMAÂ· Â· Â· Published In The Aspen Tlme, March 23, ALTA Corp., requesting conceptual 1996. development approval lora remodel 0/ the 4 existing building. Including changes to the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE street facing lacack The property Is located at n PITKIN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO 436 W. Hyman Avenue, Lot P, Block 88, City and ...453'24: , 4 : f.,1.2..." ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE Townille 01 Aspen. For further Information. .#i REQUESTED ZONING VARIANCE DUCRIBED contact Amy Amldon at the Aspen/Pltkln -1- BELOW: Community Development Department, 130 S. Pursuant to Pltktn County Zoning Resolution Gal- Street. Aspe,L CO 92(5096 . 01 June 5, 1955, u amended. a Publk Hearinl 1/Jake VIckery, Chairman k SM will be held to consider an application med Ampen Historic Preservation Commission t with the sald Board 01 Adlustment requesting Publkhed In The Aspen Tlme, March 21 1996 authority lor varlance from the provisions ol f , the County zoning Resolution PUm.,C NOTICE All persons allected by the proposedt PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That the Board ol 4-2,1. ~ -lince â€¢re In,4ted to appear and state their County Commts,toners 01 Pltkln County, views. protests, or oblectloni. It you cannot Colorado, at Its regular meeting on February 14 appear personally at such meeting, then you 1996, alter a duly-noticed public hearing, 1 are diged to itate your viewi by letter, adopted the following Resolution: U T .glyllillillillillililill'* 11 particularly It you have oblectlon to such Granting a RezonIng ol the Aspen Htghlards vartance, as the Board ol Adjustment will give Ski Area Irom AFR-HO to AF-SKI with a Vested serious consideration to the opinions of Real Property Right Pursuant 10 Tttle 24, Article , surrounding properly owners and others 68, Colorado Revised Statutes allected in deciding whether to grant or deny Jeanette Jones. Deputy County Clerk the request for varlance. A VARIANCE Published in The Aspen Times March 23, 1996. GREATER THAN OR LESS THAN THAT 1 ~ REQUESTED COULD BE GRANTED. PUBLIC NoncE DATE AND TIME OF MEETING: Tuesday, April PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: Thal the Board ol 2,1996: 5:15 P.M. County Commillioner' of PltkIn County. , LOCATION OF MEETING: Meeting Room. Colorado. at Its regular meeting on February 28. JOE ANDOE NEW ART FROM ' Pitldn County Ubrary 1996, after a duly-noticed public hearing. CORDOVA, STEVE AND 1.YNNF: requesting adopted the following Resolution: approval for a 41 north side yard setback Granting Conceptual Submlilon Approval to varlance, where 15' Is required, to construct a Charles and Barbari 0,1 and Same Plclrus with - New Pailitiligs CUBA & MEXICO *Ingle-farnlly residence. Property location: 1~t a Vested Real Property Right Pursuant to Title 7. Crystal River Park Subdlvislon. 24. Article 68. Colocallo Rev~sed Statâ€žtes ENGERING. YVO: requestlng approval lor a Je'nette Jones. Deputy Couniy Clerk thiÂ·ough April 13 through April 15 92' arterlat highway set back varlance, where p?bllâ€¢hed 1,~lE.Aspen Tlmes March 23, 1996 DAVID FLOR IA GALLERY ~1 7%,%3*â€¢,â€¢,M,~m~ \'At tâ€ž Ilic \1 #di inÂ·,Â·k 1,1\ lÂ·/ 11. \\l,od\ Acck 517 E. Hopkins, Aspen 423-33)5 923-5705 r- , 4â€¢Â·,Â· .2-*./VA#Arliv,/wr- . 9% /' ' Â·~it'el/v/., t, Ae,â€¢gs/~- - ' 9 3.Efc, 'tr.1.1. ~. 'fpy , 1141;1 t. .. . , 1 NEW HOME IN MISSOURI HEIGHTS ./ This wonderful home sits on 3 1/2 acres, has an open floor -771#NkqON,/ ~ mountains. The living room, complete wiR a fireplaccand plan, an expansive deck, and is ideal for living amid the ~ an all wood cathedral ceiling, boasts views of Sopris, the Bells, Mt. Daly and Capital Peak. The second story loft ~ From the Pitkin County Commissioners to all the people who recently applied to serve on the County's Citizen Boards. The number of people who volunteered is a wonderful indication of ~ your office, guest quarters, or as a television den. And, when ~ ~ provides plenty of storage space and a wonderful room for the deer graze in your back yard, there's a real sense of why how much talent and dedication we have in this community. We depend on you to help us we all moved here and why we all stay. Off.red for ~ serve the public and continue to make this valley an exceptional place to live. Thanks for your 3400,000. Owner is Broker. dedication to Pitkin County and your willingness to serve your community. . 5 SOLD - CALL NOW! Ellen Anderson Janet Raczak John Starr Jay Webster , Ron Thompson Kevin Schulman Christopher Tolk Dr. Gison , TOWN HOMES Rich Carr Claire Sandersen David Weiss Teny Hunt NEAR FUTURE GOLF COURSE Lisa McManigal Ethel Levantin Nancy Willette Karen Lutz ~ Pine doors/cabinets; tile & berber; vautted ceilings. Sopris ~~ Glen Rappaport Wally Obermeyer 21=#c: Don Sheely Kim Johnson Thomas Todd Dieter Blbblg when it snows, there'Â§ a fireplace! Fn- $184.900. ~ views from living room, master bedroom & den. Cozy up 02%. Kurosh Valajanad Garry Snook Jake VIckery Thomas Daly Molly Ireland James Valerlo Hany McNamara John G. Humphrey ~ Jeffrey Evans Stephen Felt Paul Krausch Kirk Lawrence Kennet Van Kesteren Marcia Goshorn Stu Huck James Richards Ann Wilton Bob Helmus Bob Sullivan Lawrence Winnerman Heidi Hoffman Guston Alciatoro Fred Uhler Dan Fevold Nick McGrath James Easterling Howard Hanson Bill Reynolds Ted Guy Danny Abbot Jim Markalunas Joe Saladino Bruce Hazzard Cindy Ashcroft Arthur Cerre Cliff Runge Michael Cooper Gary Wright Jean Stem George Krawzoff Rocky Tschappat Chuck Vidal Brent Gardner-Smith . ~1. WENDY C. LUCAS, LICENSED BROKER 963-'1562 ~A M Kaet Snyder Bill Fales Lanny Curtis '92 Thomas Marshall Monroe Summers David Schoenberger I ( * .. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 428 E. HYMAN AVENUE, CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 10,1996, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in the Sister Cities Meeting Room, Basement of City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider a proposal submitted by LOMA-ALTA Corp., requesting conceptual development approval for a remodel of the existing building, including changes to the street facing facade. The property is located at 428 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot P, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Amidon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO. 920-5096. s/ Jake Vickerv, Chairman Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on March 22, 1996. City of Aspen account. ASPEN HIST~C PRESERVATION COMM~ION APR. 10. 1996 426 E. HYMAN - CD - PH Sven Alstrom seated. Amy Amidon stated that the proposal is to construct a new facade for the building, one which aligns with the other buildings. In general Staff is in favor of a new facade as the building does not contribute to the historic district as it exists today. The features do not align with the adjacent Sportstalker building or the Aspen Drug building and a lot of that is caused by the remodel as they are not tearing the building down and there are existing floor levels already established. In reviewing this at least at the first floor level it is important to create a grand somewhat taller commercial space. Staff recommends that the first floor level be pulled back from the wall so the building front can be carried upward. Staff is recommending tabling with the following restudy issues: 1. The first floor level fenestration shall be revised to be the same height as that of the Sportstalker, to the extent possible. 2. Upper level fenestration should align with or be compatible with that of the Sportstalker, to the extent possible. 3. Create a stronger cornice element. 4. Eliminate the roof"pop-top." 5. Center the entrance door. 6. Eliminate the new stair on the street elevation. 7. HPC hereby waives Ordinance #30 design review standards, except for those dealing with FAR issues. Assistant Attorney David Hoefer stated that the proof of notice has been submitted. Chairman Jake Vickery opened the public hearing. George andj Jadet Lathan are the applicants. George Lathan stated that he was a resident for 20 years and he fit the bill for a tenant of the property with the understanding that they would remodel 3 ASPEN HISTOM[C PRESERVATION COMMI~ON APR. 10. 1996 the building. George stated that he agreed with most of Staff s recommendations. Dick Fallin, architect stated that there is a full basement that will be a night club bar arrangement that will remain and has two exits out of the basement one at the alley and one at the front which will be remodeled with the new store front remade. The first and second floor are retail in the front and the accounting offices will be on the back part of the second floor. He also stated that the unique part of this building is, its part of the Sportstalker structure and the existing stairwell that is exposed on the mall is the fire exit for the sportstalker operation. They are a two story building and ours is a three story building. The stair shall remain where it is and they are just remodeling how they actually use it from inside George's operation. There is an existing corridor that runs down behind the first window in the Sportstalker building which run through to the back of the building to another exit that goes into the alley. There is a 1/2 floor level difference from one building to the other which causes problems on how the facade is addressed. Fallin also indicated that they would like to be able not to be dependent on a tenant for the second floor that has to be part or George' s operation. In response to Staff's concern about the new stair, the west stair, it was to give direct access to the second floor retail operation. It has been determined that the new stair makes the store front on the first floor narrower for display purposes which is a curtail point of any retail operation. New sketches were entered into the record. Dick Fallin stated that the building is a non-conforming building and is in the historic overlay district. The FAR can be moved around but it cannot exceed what is already there. Dick Fallin asked i f walls were done on three sides is there a way that it can be called an open stair so it doesn't effect the FAR. HPC has indicated that they would like to see the stair closed and the Planning Office has indicated ' that if HPC approved the closed stair they will agree also. 4 ASPEN HISTORI~RESERVATION COMMISSI~ APR. 10. 1996 Janet Lathan stated at the site visit a great objective of HPC was to bring the front out. She stated that they took that direction and gave up FAR to achieve that. A window point is necessary on the second floor. Dick Fallin stated that an elevator is proposed in the alley to suffice ADA, and they are not required to go up to the third floor. COMMENTS & CLARIFICATIONS Jake Vickery asked ifthe elevator would be accessed through George's space. Dick Fallin stated yes. Susan Dodington asked if the height of the Sportstalker first floor was the consistent height in the historic district throughout town. Amy Amidon stated that the Sportstalker and Aspen Drug were about 16 feet and in looking at other buildings across the street that was consistent. Martha Madsen asked if it was unrealistic to try to use common space for the stairway access. Dick Fallin stated that the stair could not be put in the that area because it is a separate lease and they are not remodeling their building. Janet Lathan, owner: When they built that building there was a staircase outside the sportstalker and they took that down and right from the beginning there was a common space. The two buildings are joined. Roger Moyer asked i f the second floor was set back and that facade was not a facade and you had an exterior walkway outside on the second floor to the east would that effect your FAR. Janet Lathan stated that it would effect the retail. Amy Amidon stated that if a floor is not there it is not FAR. 5 ASPEN HISTOM~C PRESERVATION COMMI~ION APR. 10. 1996 Roger Moyer stated if the space is open it would not effect their FAR. Dick Fallin stated that for clarification they have taken the one box and split it in half and pulled it apart to create a two story space so the first floor has an area that is two stories high with the two isolated boxes at each end so the net FAR is the same, except i f the stair is classified as interior for every floor area of that stair they would loose that FAR from the existing second floor retail space. Roger Moyer stated that the applicant needs the stair to be considered open from the HPC so it doesn't count as FAR. Melanie Roschko asked what the size of the retail space on the second floor was. Dick Fallin stated originally 1800 sqft. and they have taken out 400 sqft. for stairs. The 1400 sqft. is divided into two separate spaces. Sven Alstrom asked ifthe materials would be brick veneer and steel detailing. Dick Fallin stated that the third floor would be a wood front and set back 15 feet. Chairman Jake Vickery closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Donnelley Erdman stated that he feels exhibit #2 should be explored as a strong transitional element as a facade. The element does not slavishly try to pull the horizontal lines of the Sportstalker historical element into it. The recessive stair slot provides an articulation between the historical resource and our infill and stands on its on strongly. Vickery stated that the recess slot is only 6 inches. Erdman stated that it has been given a darker treatment and the approach is worth exploring. 6 ASPEN HISTORI~RESERVATION COMMISS~ APR. 10. 1996 Sven Alstrom stated that he agrees with Staffs memo defining criteria to evaluate a good solution. For conceptual we need a better presentation of the materials, color and shadow. The handrails stand out and the open space in the photos creates a hole and exhibit #2 is a way of diverting and has a stronger identity. Amy Amidon' s criteria could be applied as historical references and still get a strong identity. He also stated that he was not sure he would support an open stair. Susan Dodington stated that some businesses have a door. George Lathan stated that would be acceptable as long as it was counted as FAR. He cannot loose 500 sqft. off the building due to the stair case and the project will not work financially. Sven Alstrom stated he was referring to the stair case on the west side. Lathan stated he would sacrifice the west stair and it is not on exhibit #2. Susan Dodington stated that she understood the need for the three floors and exhibit #2 appeals to her. Martha Madsen stated that her focus would be the impact along the sidewalk or streetscape. She visually likes exhibit #2. Melanie Roschko stated that the solution in exhibit #2 is much stronger and has a clean look to it. It also has curb appeal and she likes the elimination of the pop top. Anything would be an improvement over what is existing. Roger Moyer asked that the entrance be set in and the applicant agreed. At the next meeting they should present a strong articulation of color and materials. He also stated he had no concern with the stair and agreed that the pop top should be eliminated. Jake Vickery stated that he was favorable to exhibit #1. He also stated that he has concerns with the landing and possibly the blending of exhibit #1 and #2 would be acceptable. Typically facades were done side by side in a block type way and he has concerns with the hyphen. 7 ASPEN HISTO~C PRESERVATION COMMI~ON APR. 10. 1996 Dick Fallin stated that most of the mall store front height on the south side is defined by storefront awnings and he would like feedback on the awning issue. He also requested a statement on the open stair which would allow them to design the building. Jake Vickery asked if the pop up was removed what would he see visually from the mall. Dick Fallin stated that you would see the apartment and the height varies from seven feet to nine feet as there is a butterfly roof system. Jake Vickery stated that there would be one continuous roof system without the pop out and it is quite high, 14 feet to the ceiling. Jake Vickery stated that the applicant has complied with most of the conditions. Dick Fallin stated on the centering of the door it would not be centered on the lot it would be centered according to the facade and might move slightly to the east or west. Jake Vickery stated that the Board needs to give the applicant feedback on the awnings and stair. MOTION: Roger moved to table the application of 426 E. Hyman to a date certain April 24th to allow the applicant to come back with a more complete presentation for conceptual; second by Sven. Discussion: Donnelley Erdman asked how the Board felt if enough direction was given to the applicant could they request conceptual and final at the next meeting. 1 Sven Alstrom stated that he feels that representation should not be given to j the applicant. Issues of compatibility need to be addressed fully at conceptual and there is a difference between conceptual and final. 8 ASPEN HISTORI~RESERVATION COMMISSI~ APR. 10. 1996 VOTE: All in favor, motion carried. Jake Vickery stated that the Board needs to give specific direction to the applicant for the next meeting. Amy Amidon stated that HPC usually looks at awnings at the first floor level. Dick Fallin stated that the building is a south facing building. Sven Alstrom stated that the building is on an historical mall and it is south facing. He is in support of awnings. Martha Madsen stated that she does not necessarily like awnings as a total solution as they seem to look tacked on. She realizes that awnings serve a purpose in the commercial core and are used for signage in most cases. She feels awnings should be done case by case. Jake Vickery stated that the applicant needs to give more detail at the next meeting regarding what they want in an awning in order for the Board to make a decision. Dick Fallin stated he understands that the review on awnings is done on an individual basis. Jake Vickery asked i f the Board was comfortable with the stair being classified as an open stair. Dick Fallin stated that the mall face will have an opening at ground level and one at the second floor level with no glass in it. Jake Vickery stated that the stair was existing and the applicant is trying to work with HPC to accomplish other general goals that the HPC has. MOTION: Roger Moyer moved that HPC recommend to the Planning Department that the new stair which is replacing the existing stair on the south east side of the building be considered an open stair element 9 . . . 0 . . APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL REVIEW HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 4.24Â·.19 . i./. /8.44 ~Â·- I * ... -- 9;Â«38ZÂ» 77Â·AL,â€¢2Â«._ AL-O,2, r---i 6 -Pup,/ / 1 1 1 1 - .1 3-WP . - -Lte- ri 9/ l- --- & 0 - 0 -- 7\ FIRST FLOOR EXISTING C+~:~ 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING NogTH 4.7-4 Â·4# a ..r. 'mat-- 9. - Â¥ .- I .... . -nâ€¢E .... 1/ S 'OV-5 -')444<Eâ‚¬.- i-+ al 1 - r -1 - ---4 (.,D ~f T- 1 1 .:2%C -+ 111 - 1 1 i li. 1 . 1 .mt,- c r74 1- 711 = E L - ' 1 1 1 1 j 1 . i L ' I 1 -V 24 1------- --- - ~-- -- Aln-. Ii>~ ~ VT-07 AiL//c< u~ -i~1 _*_~___~~ _~_ ~ 5 \\2 C -L,- - L _LM<g.-_ - 11%17-8-ZD- - - --- - , 1 1 - 4 1; 1 i I IE=-11 2 21 1 11 e L I I /-1 SECOND FLOOR EXISTING L_,7 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING NORTH 4 Â· 14Â·49 . . -. 12'Ar' L .. . . j.52:, -49-247 4 I ..i-jn~,~1*-- '4Â· *L. ..:y - 1 ... - -f -2 -1-_73,~Â°d>,<.7-57Jkz...A2*t- /+Ad-C. 2 2 1 ,Â£-4-*:4 1 I #' A .; Tr a i â€¢,M i. i 02--- 1 1 i i Â· Â· ~-- - 4- i : 1 4 4 1 F txg,Ic- i -- 1 ) i '~ IM #Tupt O AFX -252 1 - BEC'12(AT,1- APC_ZE_ i t 5â€¢. i *' i -4 1 1 & ; 1 -1 41 13 '.1 111 . . 1 A 4- , - I i 1 421 h Il= 11:. 1 1 1 1-' 4 t 1 -, S..2 : 91 'LEE,kiLL . fi -11\ fl / 1/ '11 1 u -#.--- - --~L iii i 12 IT 1 tÂ·- TE i ejrumo A FT: _ 1 - 9 14 4 i, , - 1 I : li 1 51 i P t 1 , 1 1~ +-4 1 - - . r ~~THIRD FLOOR EXISTING k / 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING #orm.1 4Â·2-4.44 .... . 1 1 f ,T , I MI I ' U - u i I .- . - : 1 f. i , 111 1 _ 0 --, F lf tf 0 --9-- 731' - 1 /1. , r.'3:'11 1 1 ---*. 'il 1 '. 11 U :i J 1 7- 1 L IN lii, p . ! i. 1 1 i.94, l il.. - . 4 1 - 1 a Â¢ li - . â€¢.11 1 ' 4 1 ~.i:i t â€¢ 1 - 11 11 1 1 i! 1 _ i Â· t r 11 1 11 U 1 j , a ' .1 1~ 1 1 -, 1 S .1 1 I ti 11 1 1 1 - t. - - 2 i - Â· i : i !,2 '1 61. 1 . i . 1 ---L 1 1 1 Â· i ,:i 1. 1 1' 1 11 1 1 ,i i i - 0 1.1 1 1 1 t , i I 1 1 11 : -:1 . . 1 .t. , 1./ - i. , 1 '1.1 i 1 1 11 1 1 I i = 1 EXISTING MALL ELEVATION L. , - 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 4 2,4.* A- . .... i ! 1 1 !1 i ii i /!i; 1 1.1 1 f Â· i i; i 2 /*,t .A /7-. 1 7 572,0/0 407-. , - - - 1 iE 7 1 :t , .III -1! - .1 -<f.* t I : i & -- , â‚¬ . \P /1 ~ luz , Z ~Â·\ 1 Off", C c . 0 2-c, C_,0 : il ... 4 - f If 1 D .1 1 1 , 1 /'2290<-4Â£Â«,er - 1 4 *r-L. |-- 3-Mt,AL-_- i . 1 /5493*1AA-/7- EXISTING SECTION LOOKING EAST 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 4,244Â·99 . 1 , 1 1 1 1 -- I - \. 1 'W' p,4:- ir 1; i â€ž-4 - -- 4. . 4 \Ir/ 1 . 11 -U - Â«TDKAAE-- -- - - 7 1--14 Jr 1 li V - - I 1// 4 . \ /1 - -- -- v 1 - /1 =,Hz B=,YEN 1 11 1 . 11 /31-1 1 ~ Â·- t.. ;t?714 014 i._~ 1 i - ; 1-(1= - i i i. 11 / 3-512 i 'f - , 1 / i }1 i 6 1 -- 1 ; . E 11.-- 1 1 21 9 -I! ~ ! r- ~ 1 :1 11 i 1 1 1 -- 1 .- - al 1...1Â» i i~ 1 !19 1. 1_3 5 1 - '-1. 1 0 BASEMENT PROPOSED 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING Re/!522 4 - 24 -9 w NORTH - ~G - Â· 1 --- - & 7.Â» 7.-7 4 ./ -I- : , 4 .... - 1 C 1.---a . 1 If .1.- - 1 11 ~ ~ -3 +-13- i.pJX 1 > 4.-+ 124 2 RAMP i ~ ~~ i 7 1 1 1,1 .7 -Il .-Lve 1 I L v i , i ..4 4 u- 1 iff / ~ 1.r i! I. 1 1 -1, 4/ 2 % :11 ..4 1 1 1 , 1 11: FF==9 1 0 0 0 -, . 1 1 1 . 1 -:â€¢ 11 3-' ,~\ 1 1 1 1 --1 /'26.*,G -m->>1 - - + =- tl 1 1 - . d Ni 1 ,1 rn.i I f i. 1 1 t 1 1 - 1 le. 21 i ---1 - 1 - 1 -1 i i...L ,-/,1 - .. -1 1 1 C r -LELL'LI 00 -/ 1 i !_ , i-[ 1 -- cutz==- ,$ s,e. - 1 +Â£ 1 - 1- r- . r 42\11 FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED / 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING ge/':SEC 4 -24-10 Jim=r,-1 . it! f-Â·'- - 1 U. 11 1 1- - f ... 02- - 1 I *.7- 1 I 4 1. 1 / 11 't .0 3 9 / 1 + \ -1 V - 42 $ 0 4 - 1 r - 1.1 Val . 1 , i 0 2 lili $ 1 42 \ 42 h 1 , I Ill 3. -j , it 'r' O .ru 42 â‚¬ FiÂ· L.Ji i Â¢ 1 1: / 3 4 -4 4 9 1 1 Y td 01 4. - 0 UJ i 42 , 1 1 . 6 HI lit / ,4 Il 111 -1 ..4 -3 <'~ -acur- ~ 1 K __ - - 7 0 -H l 1. Z O . 1 IL~ 0 LU 1 If .4--- 1 co --4 - f - -F --- . i ~urit 1 7- 2 ONIallrld NVINAH 19Â¥3 92* / 2'21=1=10 27 9/71==,0 0390dOEId EI001=I 1 1 . t t, S 1 5 ".9. A T 1 1 -) 4# .1 -ki '0 AI 1 4 12 "-* t S 4 1 1Â· i, > ; 1 . i Ill 1 'i 1 . ~te-- -=TO---=-1. 1 11 If - - f 4 Or-9 <3 r 2% 9 43Â© .t P 61 -* 4 1 4 1 .1 5 l f: / ~ -I }cz \di-0/ 2 - 97 /0/0 03SOdOEId 13001=I CIHIH 9Nla-lina NVWAH 19Â¥3 93* m - k '5-1./. 9&.- # ./ :I *L/.rl. I' : '~-2,1 - , .. 1 - 1 0 r-1 Ee.--Ii f-171- 1 - 1 'r3 9 114Â£2 Clo 2 2'. 4 UÂ·Â· " Â·Â· â€¢Â· 4+L -- 2P-OW=-4- 3_1_,- _-=-/1.2,==..0.-=. C --3 1 Cl ~.1~ .3-;- J -~ 1 00 C ~.t' 1 - r -- ..1---I---. Â·Â¢t Â· 1 1 = CO-00 .: :i J 1 1 1 -.11 !,19 - 197- *E- 31/ 24 - - - I 1, r b lit , It 1 1 - 111 ;1 11 Elig'i - li i. n 1-1 9===FF I~U IA.I-i[ 1 ..2.-3 j! IÂ· 019 : 1 , $ 21: , h 9 - .-r:.'--- 11 - 4 - -I - . - - . I- IN i. - - 1 11 'lii A 21 i I ,/ F Flil i. : 4 ! ~ 1- 1 1 5: - 1.1 1 1 11 1 ! 1 0 1 1 iiI 11 1 Â· 1 j 1 -L 1 -1 Â¢!I ;:i 1 ('4 1 1,1:il, ill 13 lili 1 11 Liillt 111[li' ll R , 1 1 1 : 1 i l -- --11 : .. I -* i 1 3 , . t i LOT 0 2772/32-2- 2.. L.o~ p - ---- i.3'r~ CR -_ f - 4 i . -- 1 - - - 7--2 =<tix +~i - Zz - - -- 1 I i li II PROPOSED MALL ELEVATION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING KEVI:522 4- -24-96 F 1 4 9Nrl tf)-LÂ¥ M 2Nn NOJVW 7 -- 1 . . Clt - ./ I ./. 4*. -- - -t-*14+9. , 1~k -5Â·g-'4..90' 1 % . ... k 3 1 1 1, i! . 0 . 1 -. t 'ii i 4 1 1 - 11 i '. 1 1 bi i; i t 'f #1 Â·, u , 1 1 - 1 - - 1 ; 1 - i i i -fi ~ i i Li i d iÂ· t i- c 11 1 ..a Mil r , - . 1 TY-,1 -1 1 1 -1-;r-- . -r-4- 1 1--1 1 'r-1 1- 11--27--17; 91 . . 4 -i - --.i--Â»- - .. ~---t- - - ,/ i.- J-~, iii! , il .1 ~~ ,~ ~, ~. I r-- r-1 1 1 - - - - - - -1 - - - - \ CA,Jifi'AbjW<----CS1~~ L - 1 --- 1 i 1 1 i--*E -2-_12.-2-.I-7.0â‚¬ 26 7-32_722_--T~f-_~T_.3_T-31--*KE-42---2 --2 - T . PROPOSED MALL ELEVATION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING RE,opp-_4- 14-1(p \ MArcti uNa 1 1 1 , .....4-- t, 07 El i . .:-11919;.7 11,>-101 4 9 --hits'TS'+ 12 1 r* 4 1 ~ 21 -Â°751 -- R al 1 , 1 1 , 61 E * - 2 Â· . ~J f f un B C.Vt 2 1-. CA f 9 60 r Â¢ w 1- A 6 \C 2 1 , E k f Kti * 1 1}' Il h (DO 1 P H 1 III . (11 4- F r .4 b 412 - 2 2-1- _ -1 4 - 0 ~ #-i _i ~f ,<~,2 -~L_-/' A -1- 1Â« 7 1 4 -1-1 #i \ U_-J/' L- +1 i FI-f.- ---4 - \ 1 1 '. i 1 i: 1 "F-42;2. .~.~., Z~.1 ... _~| , . - T---I.4--4....- 1 :1 V-f 1 0-1 . lili 11 1 % / / It 1 3\ \ 1- 1 1 1 < \ \ 1 \ I - g. 1 /6 - to\\ \ i i \ U /6. Wk 1 '1 1 /1 1 It-M il -- .e. _. 1- IL , 1 2 \ I &2 1 1 Â· 1 i &5 194 41 9 M 1 7 1 1 1 N 1 111 1 1 1 r-- 11 i 1 11 1. Â¥11 t 1 'i 11 . 4211 r j 1 6 i" 4 1 4- .1 1 11 - al r i P Ex 1 \1. k- 1 .K, 0 18 8 X 3 i 111 i I.1 1 9 4 1 1 1! 1- 3 00 \. Â£1 1: I 1 11 as 1 4 0 6 ,1 U.1 <a 10 K ' ' O 0 V t> r i C...!U 1 11 L - CLT 99 Z 1 1 0 ill . 0 =.t LU CO 'I i O 9 1 1 1 0- m El 03: i \\, U U Â» 4-4 11 11 jL . ...1 - 16 111 < .40' H -r. L LMIT -- - 0<71..,0----7-- li ~- 9Nlalln8 NVINAH ..K Â»:79, 2- .. .... . t 1 - f , , 1 .1 , 1 10 1 i /:\ 9% 7 .i F. /#\ 1 - -.%3. w 4 j 1 61 \ t 2 1 . 1 2 i 1 i: f / 1- 1 1 E , 1 I 1 it -\ \# 1 --7 j J - -- 1 1 -j Â£ 41 - 1 1- i + 1 1 lii i 1 1 - f L. 1 M A 14 t: 1, ti ! '1 13 E , 1 -r- -12>ID-_22 - P - it 4 7 ---:' ( 9 < 1, - --t- r.5.3 01 7 - 1 -2 -- SECTION THRU BUILDING LOOKING EAST 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING RE/:teD - 4 - 2.4 - 9 e .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APR. 24, 1996 Martha stated that in broad terms she has no problem with the presentation. She also feels that the HPC should reapprove the materials. Jake stated that the solution proposed is less consistent with what was initially proposed. It is too far from the original design in terms of massing and the way the columns and doors are handled. There are a lot of large roof overhangs. In some ways the old design was a good solution because it stepped down the hill. The stepping helps the WL. The WL doesn't have the kind of overhang visions articulated between the units. There seems to be a lot of glass. Sven stated if you look at the conceptual approval you now have a different type of space. Give an interpretation of usable balconies that are more sheltered. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC encourage P&Z to accept the overall mass and scale of the amendment to final finding that it is fitting within the Herbert Bayer design. HPC requests that the applicant come back and we look at landscaping, materials, and possibly some redesign of porches before we grant any final. Regarding the HPC support of Ord. #30 a better functionality of porches and decks meets the requirement of Ord. #30, second Martha. Motion passes 3-1. Roger stepped down. 426 E. Hyman - Conceptual Development David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney stated that HPC no longer has four members present and in order to get approval a positive vote of all three members must occur or the applicant can request continuation until the next hearing. Chairman Jake Vickery opened the continued public hearing. 5 .. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Because the Commercial Core is a historic district, recognition of, and reflection of established architectural patterns is important to the preservation of the architectural character of the area. The project has accomplished this goal. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC approve the proposal as submitted. Recommended motion: "1 move to grant final approval for the development at 426 E. Hyman Avenue as proposed." 3 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APR. 24,1996 George Lathan, applicant decided to proceed. At the last meeting it was recommended that we redesign the front due to the elimination of the stairway. Amy stated that at the last meeting we talked about eliminating the staircase and centering the entrance door. Dick Fallin, architect for the project stated that new drawings were presented at the last meeting and the majority like #2 but Jake wanted a combination. The impression was that the building should stand alone as far as design goes and that the historical references would be materials and the alignment of the windows. Amy stated that Jake was concerned with the height of the third floor. Dick stated that tapes were put up on the building to identify the two new facade heights. We lowered the building on the third floor a couple feet. A new packet was presented today and the first floor proposed is changing the floor plan on the mall end of the building to reflect the new elevation. The second floor proposed reflects the two story opening in the middle of the building after we were allowed to now count the stair as FAR. Dick stated that the owners need enough visual display on the second floor from the street as it will be a separate retail operation. The second stair on the west end has been eliminated entirely from this scheme. There is a recessed entry with windows on both sides. The connecting element between Sportstalker and this building will be the unglazed openings on the first floor that go into the stairwell. There will also be an unglazed opening on the second level that goes into the Sportstalker on the half level and that element would be a stone facing sawn grid pattern. Basically the facade is brick and stone on all three levels. Sven stated that he was concerned about the alley side and what was proposed on that side and had a few comments on the front facade. He also has concerns about lighting. Dick Fallin stated that the existing yellowish tone brick will remain and there will be an elevator element added. There would be a wooded picket 6 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APR. 24, 1996 railing painted. The second floor wall will come out to the balcony line and we will build a new balcony that comes out to the stair. Sven asked about the mechanical equipment. Dick Fallin stated that there is meetering and gas lines exposed in the back of the building that will remain and air handling equipment we do not anticipate any changes and if so it will be on the back of the building not the roo f. There are a few things on the roof that are abandoned and they will be removed. Nothing will be visible from the mall side. Jake went over the seven recommendations from the last meeting and all were addressed. Amy stated that there may be windows in a no window zone which relates to ordinance #30 on the third floor but HPC can waive that standard. Dick Fallin stated at the last meeting it was mentioned that Ord. #30 could be waived. Jake asked if anyone had concerns about the changes on the mall elevation. Sven stated that the applicant definately responded to the imput at the last meeting. The use of the stone emphasis is appropriate. Sven commented on the second floor fenestration with regard to compatibility in an historical sense. He stated that the second floor windows to at least look like they were operable in the same proportion of a more vernacular historical buildings. The windows should be of a more vertical proportion and the grouping needs restudied. The windows should read as functional and possibly use an operable sash on the second floor. Dick Fallin stated that they could look at a stone mullion between the ' windows. Five windows could be incorporated. j Sven stated that he wants to see the proposed lighting on the building at final. 7 .. ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APR. 24, 1996 Martha stated that she preferred the proposed windows. Dick Fallin stated that there is a compactor in the alley that will be used and he assumes that the trask regulations will be waived due to the dumpster. George Lathan stated that the tenant downstairs wants to put a cafe in the alley to draw people. Jake stated that the scheme was a great improvement. He also agrees with Sven that possibly the use of masonry between the windows would increase the verticality. The building is an infill building and should have flexibility in the design. The recess cornice on the third floor should be a little plainer and less dominant. MOTION: Sven moved that HPC grant conceptual approval for 426 E. Hyman Ave. with the following conditions: 1. At final bring a restudy of the second floor windows. 2. Restudy of stone banding. 3. Address Jakes concern of the upper cornice being plainer. 4. Present a lighting plan. 5. HPC waives Ordinance #30. Second by Martha. All in favor, motion carried. 1, J 8 .. 'Â£76) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ,- THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director c A Â« FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 426 E. Hyman Avenue- Final DATE: May 8, 1996 SUMMARY: The applicant requests final approval for a significant remodel of the existing building at 426 E. Hyman Avenue. This building was built in 1969-1970 and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. It exceeds current FAR allowances. HPC granted conceptual approval on April 24, 1996, with conditions. See minutes of April 24. APPLICANT: L and M properties, represented by Baker Fallin Assoc. LOCATION: 426 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot P, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: "CC," Commercial Core. Conceptual Development PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the , subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. Response: The project involves remodeling of the existing structure, to create a new street facade. 1 .. Currently, there are two stairs in the building, one in the front corner, which is a shared required egress with the Sportstalker building, and the other which is on the alley. These existing staircases control where the floor levels for the building lie. Staff is very much in support of a remodel of this building as it has none of the typical features or characteristics of the adjacent historic structures and does nothing to strengthen the qualities of the historic district. The project has received conceptual approval, with a few conditions to address. First, the applicant was asked to restudy the second story windows to make them more vertical in proportion. Staff finds this condition met. Secondly, the applicant was to restudy the stone banding and lintels. The stone has been replaced with steel lintels and supporting columns on the ground floor. In addition the lintel corresponds to the dimension of the window opening instead of carrying across the facade. The third floor is now shown as stucco to make it recessive. The lighting plan is addressed in the written description of the project. Staff finds that the applicant has met the conditions of approval and that final approval may be granted. Additional information on materials will be presented at the meeting. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: This remodel has the potential to significantly strengthen the character of this side of the block and the mall in general. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal does not affect the historic significance of any adjacent parcels. 2 .. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Because the Commercial Core is a historic district, recognition of, and reflection of established architectural patterns is important to the preservation of the architectural character of the area. The project has accomplished this goal. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC approve the proposal as submitted. Recommended motion: "1 move to grant final approval for the development at 426 E. Hyman Avenue as proposed." 3 N A LLEÂ¥ ALUACENT BU JLDJ NO BLOCK 88 -216.- ENCROACHED O.1 0.3 3 2,9(21â‚¬OD-lklÂ»47 0,4 ALLEY' - \ CATÂ»fLA< Maote L__ 5 fic':162/<Sli .9 90 0 41 CONCRETE <j 4 0 5 10 20 30 43 30 FT r A e M. i u. c M ill lili 1 DCALD I"= 10' 3%Â©19 OF DEARI NGO * 2K / 9 Â·514'50'41"W DETWEEN NW AND OW O.19 FROM WILDING (DKNIERS> O F L.OT 14 , DLCO<. 5 5, EOT-1-1 -TO PROFFRIN' YELLOW FLAâ‚¬571(2- CAE, L.9 1 1 54 1 5 UKVETOK' 5 CEKT-IFICATE 00 1LD,11<16 / / r 1, JAMED K laÂ·DEA HEIKEEÂ« CEATIrr THAT THIO MAr KE.f'KEDENTE A OUIEVEY Ffilâ‚¬-FOK.MED UNDER MIr 9.-/F'E.RVIDION ON k VIAâ‚¬O-4 1 23 Illa 41 ALrINE BUIVErÂ© INC. Pl \1 X JAMED R REDER., 0 * 1 7 P Q R S L.0. 1 IÂ©4 U DATE. k b 1>4 // O. . e . 7- 4 1 1 1 880 - 9 . . . . 1 0 0 1 9 6 /.O k / 1%3/ 775 3 0,69 /:*041 A'/ZIP/.45 -~Â«/975 Â°09'<21 30.00,7 -9~- 0 6 ENEOMENT 70 pROPSATT ON LOT Q WYMAN AVENUE ~ -Ii-- -- 7-- 1 1 1 NOTICE According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon any defect In this survey within three years after you first discover such defect Alpine Surveys, Inc. Surveyed .3 Â· [2 Â· 16 0 L Revisions 4.02.16 0-IANGE "12.55' To "21.0511 Title Job No 96-7 Drafted 3 2-1 - 16 J.k-1.5,0 (00 TREfiE !) DOIRVING FEE-91.IT Â©015/Er. Client LAFIN In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced FALLEN/ more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon Post Office Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81612 LOT f, DLOCK Â©8, 970 925 2688 CITV OF AÂ©FEN, COLORADO 0 0 0 0 APPLICATION FOR FINAL REV[EW HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING MAY 2,1996 . 0 0 0 0 Response To Motion Bv HPC 4/24/96 1.) The second story windows have been-redesigned for HPC review The windows have a more vertical emphasis, Contain one picture unit and four - operable units with a steel lintel replacing the initial stone lintel. 2.) The stone banding has been restudied and- steel-beams andcotumns Â· have been added to the mall street facade. 3.> Thelhird floor cornicehas beeneliminated: The- original-stoneand brick - material at the third floor has been changed to stucco. 4.) The lighting plan-is- addressedon the proposed- mall elevation. Alighted 9 . . t..3.. hanging sign is above the entrance. Recessed can lighting will light the - *- : &--: 'P &::=I recessed doorway. Recessed can-lighting will light the storefront display areas, and a recessed can light will light the upper floor hallway entrance. --- 5-) NA g -- .:.,# id.*sk~-23-,a.' -- L.6--Â· â€¢U.~81&$<AR<:~~ -*L~A 44-:k*&&,Â£4:%65;4.46,~~#1;44,Â·N--1<-4.-8*:wâ€ž:&Â·--6--.Â·4Â·-W&f:. #A~,C$&45.ii.:WkJBC. ..42.1&.~ ' :â€¢ dâ€ž2 2 .. 1% 0 6 U .ias -----001&-- NU -----rgl Â§46 ':d 28 1 -3 581 611 4 ~ 32 9 1 3 b #01 1 4 94 8 3 oj 0 0141 0 7 1% ? 3 44 . 111 m 0 - 0 r F :1 4 5 .':t lit ' U 28 3 ' 1 /1 i P 'iIi A ) ' k li $-0 F / 1 0 -0 Te--- 7 --Â·r 2-- 2-i~~~_- 4 0- /1.7 1 2/1 ' i 0 0 , 1 -1 0 1 1 1, / 1 *8 1 EE / \L, \12/ . 1 1 , 1 I W-: 1 1 1 !,1., , i 1 ZP , - ..11=- . 1 C pm i 2-rl / j - - v .rjr . -m . _EE~--- -...... ..... *.- f . 0 -- - 'El 1 - ==-1 5% I< .. Z . =57- 0 I. 4 A -- - / 1 /1 , 1 i \ / , 1 1 1 ~ / 1 - 11 1 1 I C4.-- 1- / 1 . 1 1 - 1 1 \ I -.-] .7=- ----- - Y. -1 141 - 1 -- / 1 - -1--- I . i 1 . -r- --4 0 M 1 02. I 1 I ju .- I in-- -- 1 ... , i ..51~1 , / .'. L - 1 UL. - 1 1 1 1 I ~jll' 1 -6 \ - 1 r- -. f VI / L-- , ch Al . ly . 41 1 4 4 I 4 4,<4 4 9 .2 Â» RA /1 *E 0 ' 1 44 . .... 7, o. rk*tky=tn- , 0,1 CLed Ll M 6 - .- P. 5 2 ' - 1113 - Â· 4 ,52& 4 Â· . .. ./. - f*LE . - - i t y~t . I .,A 77-Pf /80-Fi-le< . - 2. 2 -H. 2 .f:- - -6. 41*L#*91*264Â¢-f ....:. 221*4**.,i.9-R-p:ar 1 J~l-Z-:)*1%11&%2*ti=f,f#Vfiria#Emwjitevi 1 Sag:0,0 0 /9-4 L- -- 11 i I 1 . 1 -7- 62.1 -r. - rug.67- FUe. - 1)Wgi/OWE/51 '1' 31 7 1 1*4 1., PROPOSED PARTIAL SECTION AT MALL 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING -4-:...iUâ€¢k~VI, 1 ... 7 -,~ . . .i t. .. I 0 0 0 0 k a 1 Â£8 9 --+L-- *priA ==4-= ==1,--Er=tair-=C-t='Ef=CUe-~-â‚¬-EJE _ - ..5 - i ST.7 4-1 1. , ...1 , I 1"*07--0 1 r--h r's-y .. . 1!i ! f! :1 0 '2 4 1 i :. Â· 1 = - -: i i: 13 4 if N Â· 9 - f - /,1 1/1 121 . .1-1 - . -a - 4 2 8 ~ It 11. 1 f . 1,1 1. 11 :11 [1. a i , L__[! 4 1 1- 1 - 1 1 1 1/ i I _ . . - i 1-- i It 1- 1 1 4 . - toi :01 -C! - - -~ 4-. 4- ~-Lil -7 14 1 .1 1 11 '', 0 - . 1. 4 1110 21. 1 14 :2 1 IiI 11 it 1 2 01 417 i I i 1 -1.- - C 11 11 - - -- 11 1 :11 1:ili:''Ii''li'IÂ·' ': H 174 1 11 1 t 17 # Ar , O - 20 - \- r------ r ! PROPOSED MALL ELEVATION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 1, - - 1 + WN/-7 491 VW .W,G?21 ... *?5'*. . ' 44-*F. + 1 - O - -- ----- --- --- -. 1 3 !i 1 ~: Â£ 2 4- 1 Â· . I 1 1 1 1 e r E- --i~ il , $ 1 . 1 j - 1,11 41 _ t-, D + 9 , ' 2 i -t ; 1 1 , 1 .1 . 0 2 j p it 1 1- 2 ' iiI 1â€¢11 h r â€¢ I 1 1 - 1 -11 -i-il-.--*i- ---~.-- -Il.--=. - ) , 2--4-/-2-'Jl 4 il 'I 1 Â· 1-11# Al Al ii Â«i P-&4 iff, -* 1- 1- 1-1 1 1 i 1 . -- 1 ' 6 ACC:,46_-~T~-C:z57- _ . _ 1 . 1 1.1.1 1 j - 1 , 1 . 2 -7 7 2- .----2 -3.1.-f .7-7647- -- S -7---2 -712 --:f3--7 --fT-r--fl---7- --------- - --1-- -- - PROPOSED MALL ELEVATION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING KEY!Â»2 4 - 14-9, - '4. MArc# UNa. AL- *41 . t. 444 - 1.... 7.- - ..4 -I- .. \ i.-1- 1 \ #Low -- -- F*rE GF NS,1/1Â·'f - - 4 - EXIST'4 2,/46,1-de ar'---=- 173'r: 1, IN6 -- 2 6 40 ' HT. LIM IT 1 1 3- New- Ra,F h - 1 6 TPr .OF New YPS#Aps-1- -_ TRAT le /444420 244,â€¢2 t Â·2 i. 1 , 1 //2-Sft~rrsTAL-k~Zit - e . f _ geeÂ»40 -~ ; --0, us 00-~t- 6:6L7 \ - _. _ _ Extill:k ..0:(De --) _ + -1 . 4- _ -6--i-7 450 -KEEU Â·941% exts/4 , >NE#.4-ODUREd - <M - 1 - /' -125,> dE New fk~ 227 0 62*PND -- - - " 0-- . 'f -- : Il / .* A.: 4 TA,fr p,5 1;7-Wd--480 00 4,1-E~, i.~ IN X , 1 - 0 2,67!.5,4 -- i -EKS:,4 - -- 14 0 1 +1 1 - -1 1 9-R~ 010 ,p-r_.---Tz rz_. _- MAL./ 7. - -- . Ze)2 Apr--12=_71=22-2 Â·,Â·'- f 77UI TI \.1 11) 1 i .9 AP -21*it. + l 61 1,/ 4 .' 1 114 - 1 1 1- , 1 1, ...1 1 - L v-ve- 0,=-- _ 1 - I , 1, 1 1 11 4 NEr,v.L. 1 11 \ 11 - --2.-&70'ft-z>00 - --2 -4-- , 16 7-- - /2"0 PUR_ 0& â€ž57% C.Â»C 04- 8Â«'97-00â€¢ 84. ~ --0 iâ‚¬774/L-- - i 11' --f .1 . 1 1 .6 7 . c.2 7 - i_~! . 1 1 1 1 01 t. - CR . .1 1 - ... I- -- 11 , . 1.1- /, li ' -Â·- 0 1 i! 1 1 ! 161 F=>R- 1 - ---t- 7 -. _rn >r-i--Se L / ~7 ./ r & 1 AA. .-*Â©AT. .. +1 \ 1 1 PROPOSED SECTION LOOKING EAST 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING .ze.v 9-1-19 1 .g19 .. ------- 1 1 1 2 i / L \1 Â· f li - 1 -1~ . Ti 1/Â·-7 kIMPU_Â¢8[+14 1 11 1,11 i \ i i 1 1: /11 il 11 i I 1 11 IN i - 1 41 H 111 1 ... il \ it ; liii!hil i 11 1 1 1 1 : 4 p - : i i All H i 4 -- 11 Ii-I-*.-r '' f u ki d i j i I __J L__ ' Li 6--j 11 1 / 1 1 1 *-kIEW 45.%1**4 f I h . 4 1./ 1 11 u p ji i 1 IIi :; 1 111 i \ 1 111 Fl 11 \ 1 - 1 11 -6 ~L- -7141=14 2-NT- -24_ 1 1-7114EW_-AteAMNÂ«f Ji 1 ' aweog--r n . - 1 PROPOSED ALLEY ELEVATION 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 5-2-30 V. . _ n A -I *. A. -I -- 4*&/p 0 - Â·. . l . 8. 1 1 3 1 i li 1! . 11 i. > 1 1 i li ' i ~1-1/ 277 0- -7 4 li il 4 li I i li 1* 1| h Â· 1 1 ' -4-8 11 6 1 il 1 1.1 11 : 1 h i, i I \41 ! / . - 1- i & J \. 1 \ 1 j EXISTING ALLEY ELEVATION ---- 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 5-1-1 co â€ž; . V-. I. :00. 0 0 0 0 il i - ......J .. J +W 4 . PIL. 1-,4 - 1 \ -- - 17 61-DRAAE--- ~~_222_Â»__ - 1 A, 1 1 ,- 1 ELEW = 6.-YL 2 - . - - ---- ID 1. r . 41 A. 1 . - 0 .. 42Â£409 -1--1 1/1 , 1 - ! 1, lijl -- | -L- a 4 A ~ .4 4 ~Â· 1 1 , 4 i, P - 1~405> ~ i -Mo,1 --- L r. 1 -- -- t. . . 0 1 1 lai , 1 1 .- - 1 E-/ ~ BASEMENT PROPOSED 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING Re/15â‚¬p 4 - 2.4 -9 8 HoRTH - 0 0 0 0 I , i > - 4---Â·Ri , RAMP 1 - ---- 1 / # 1 L liIT ; i 1 --- -. - , I 9 1 Â® 1 .. . 1 1 1 - 11? 71 1 i 1 I_ 1 - i-- - E i- 1 1 ..1, 1 41 1 1.1 -- 1 .4-* 1 1~ -- - 1 1 ii . 4 6 7 1 ; I. I- A 1 1 h -1- 0 i --~ - I---1--. 0 --- 11~ - / \ 1 -1 t'\ -7-7 1--- 1 i 1 1 1 1 /1 4 T- i L ~--i_ --04 * _A'* C/E - - i +--*i f- Lj FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED / 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING ge/ISEP_4 -24-1Â£> Â·:211 -2 I. <- 2 -- . 17' 4. â‚¬- . . 0 . 1! *L__-- 1 i - i â‚¬ 41 2 1 -- Suner,331.,- Ca,4- 94- 1.- I.- 2 1 F -ek- 1 1. 1 1 1 -~ 20 2 -14 -1 11 11 1 1 9Â»i' 1 , 1 , 1 'Drt .2_1* 95 ---6,1 1 4 , 5 / 1, ,/ 1 i / i i I -H, / 1 .,il Mit / i.l ---1 /. Â·4+4 1 ' 1 1.2 1 1 -/ 1 - 2-4 11 1 1 1 1 i \1 1 1 It J -- -U N OPFUME 1 , j 1 ---- :-L J I r \/'J i 1 , . .:i i 3 - -- -- le_.opehf-_70-29_22-_ lil /1- -224#_VUL_- 1,7 \ . 1 I 2 - o i <1 i 1 1*1* , A , | RETAt L- Â¤ I oppt 6,0 _-1 -2-1 -- i | f h 1 i N d -1 - i . 1 1 t . I } t K=F- j 112>14 --==4 4 - 1. 1 t. 1 ./ i ; 1 + 1 1 1- L D/,0â€ž VA/ 5.6. 57-AVAS , 4 T+07 /N P.A.Ar---I . -- Ply\, 0,1- Ove,J 6 . I Â¥ 64// O, 2, 27Â»/< //9 /9*>t , <-1 SECOND FLOOR PROPOSED \ -/ 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING REVIsse 4-24-10 6 +Va f T 24.- .... w 9 tfRE>,tr~'-11-Â»1-kE:14 t,ALL = 02 L ,=6429 . 0 ., ' j L . i 1 -IL i 1 1/11 i 1 ! .Put - 1 Â· 1 B! 1 1 .1 !11 1 it . -2 trUDJO Per. /1- ph 4 6< 1 f 1 ~ 4 1 li 7 : 74' ------ -- - 1 ./ 1 24 /1 - a 1 f L i Â· -ENC, 7 2 0 22=>goo,/\ AR,-t_-3-LNE~-' . ~ rug r- 25721<54\, 7 1.. 1 / :. 90225(142-30- ..====26 - , 8-4 , - 22â‚¬<260 , - c 1 -_- Sm/0/0 /'A'971 -th-- --_ i Â« 1 1---141 . 2 - g~ THIRD FLOOR PROPOSED ~J; 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING _2______ ---_-__-- fzav\~=CD 4Â·21Â·18 N P RT,4 .... + 1 ( aff<*reTA t-KER 7--- 1 ,pq eefoN 1047 , i \ i r VEUT-_21 -n - U C RA MEGÂ» ARA PET: y - 822. 1 11 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 < e,-cÂ¥a- OU= 0 0 1 0 dkp. IA 4 1 vENT.- , PENT= - 4- 1 1 2, lajego p:AgApert --2.21 ~ MAICEI:' PAIAANEM f ) EXISTING ROOF PLAN , 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 5-2-96 - MI CRFOTH- .... ------4. OvwT fir-A 1*Ex- _ ____ gas, F. 5EYâ‚¬KI 09 % L ExtsT|A ROOF-J -,-- Uaw- â‚¬>Tal,Z -_ TENJER- 9 -~- _ - 1 1 1 h 1 h / 1~ LI WE op E>er: O jd..0- egl.*4- 1 1 1 / I - 21 / 1 i 2 i NE|AL-ge9[= /4 4 -- EXIST~-i}ZOOF o ./4 A It 020 1 1 0 . > c 226 ' -- _0 REA 0 \ - 022128-~Al*z 0". 1_ 1 0 1 *W - rps>K 2 1 0â€ž 1 Â» ]6=or - -2- Â»-04 1 1 / Xi i \ MI . -1 If 'iN f -IIi f c 1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 21 1 ) 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING 5- 2-9 lo Nogrps t.. . . . 0 C . - . X 11 \ i /i i 11 : i'' / 1 , I 1 . 4 1 t '. -/ 1 ! 1 :1 1 . -:4 . - -- 11 -11 \ 1 \ t 1 J . 1 f L 1 \ i t . I C_j__ I i i ; -07208,Â£, 22 4 / V / 1 4- 11 I. 1 t 1 , SECTION- THRU BUILDING LOOKING EAST 426 EAST HYMAN BUILDING *Â».:,=M>,4 -1-4 - 40 0 11 ASPEN HIS|~RIC PRESERVATION COM~SSION MAY 8, 1996 Roger asked if the metal is going to wash out on it own or be treated. Art stated that the metal would have a wash to patina it out. Susan stated that this building fits in with the HPC's ideals. Roger stated that this is one of the better designs of the over scheme on the parcel. Suzannah stated that when the next building comes in that a streetscape be provided for the Board to review. Art stated that skylights were presented. Sven stated that reflective glass should not be used and language should be incorporated in the motion about reflectivity of glass. Art stated that the skylights would be flat against the roof. MOTION: Sven moved to approve final development for Unit D 939 E. Cooper with the condition that the architect submit a full sample palate of materials for Staff and Monitor to review, second by Melanie. All in favor, motion carried 6-0. 426 E. HYMAN - FINAL DEVELOPMENT Jake was seated. Amy stated that the applicant is proposing to redo the street facade as part of his lease. Conceptual was approved with five conditions: 1) At final bring a restudy of the second floor windows. 2) Restudy of stone banding. 16 3) Address Jake's concern of the upper comice being plainer. . 4) Present a lighting plan. 5) HPC waives Ordinance #30. 5 ASPEN HIS~RIC PRESERVATION COM~SSION MAY 8,1996 Amy stated that there was discussion about the second story window arrangement and possibly having more verticality to them. The applicant is concerned about having a more display window. There was previously stone courses and now revised to steel beams to correspond to the window. On the third floor there was a cornice and that has been eliminated. The third floor was show as brick and how is shown as stucco. There is recessed lighting and ordinance #30 is being waived. Dick Fallin, architect for the project stated that the new window proposal works for the applicant George Lathan. He stated that they modified the entryway and created an angled entrance similar to the entrance of the Paragon. The Paragon front has five foot doors with a 60% angled opening at the plane o f the building and turns into about a 7 foot wide opening which allows light into the store front. They had to adjust the second floor windows slightly to accommodate the design. George Lathan stated that he would prefer drawing C which has three windows because it opens up the interior more from the mall. Roger asked if the windows would open on scheme 3. Dick Fallin stated that they were going to try and open the windows. Melanie inquired how the roof drains. Dick stated that there are interior drains. Dick stated that the cap on the second floor will be rose stone and the spandrel above the first floor steel beam would be stone. Sven inquired about the type of glass that would be used on the windows. Dick stated that it would probably be a low E glass. - Sven stated that a sample of the glass should be included in the conditions. j Dick stated that a sand faced brick will be used and a natural cement colored grout. The materials will be similar to River Park Condominiums. 6 ASPEN HISTORIC ~ESERVATION COMMISSIO~AY 8, 1996 Sven stated that he would be an advocate o f colored mortar. He also stated that the stucco was not an issue to him. Melanie stated the accent with steel will set the building apart and the selection of materials is appropriate. She also wanted to know i f the windows on exhibit C were going to be operable or are they too large to accomplish that. Melanie also stated the alignment was appropriate and a huge improvement from what existed before. Susan stated that the entry change was a great improvement in the design. Sven stated that the display entry on C was an improvement and the mall frontage was addressed. Suzannah stated that possibly the piece over the stairs should not be the same material, possibly slate so that it becomes a slot visually. Dick commented on the colored mortar and concluded that it tended to blend the building too much. They liked the idea that the brick is brick and lets see the mortar. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC grant final approval for 426 E. Hyman Ave. as proposed to include exhibit C with materials to be submitted and approved by Staff and monitors Mark and Roger; second by Melanie. Sven stated that he would like the applicant to look at some kind of metal instead of the use of bead board. Roger stated that the issue of metal and bead board could be worked out with Staff and Monitors. Mrs. Lathan stated that she would be willing to look at the change with Staff and Monitor. Roger amended the motion that the applicant look at other possible materials for the kick plate under the ground floor window to be 7 ASPEN HIS~RIC PRESERVATION COMNMSSION MAY 8, 1996 worked out with Staff and Monitors. All in favor of motion and amended motion. 123 W. FRANCIS - WORKSESSION - NO MINUTES Jake moved to adjourn; second by Roger. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk j 8