HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.210 Midland Park Ave.0034.2005.ASLU
/0.0#
,
\
-~
'"
)
""',
City of Aspen Community Development Dept.
CASE NUMBER
00342005,ASLU
PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-18-1-66-001
PROJECT ADDRESS 210 MIDLAND PARK AVE
PLANNER JAMES LINDT
CASE DESCRIPTION PUD AMENDMENT TO ALLOW SNYDER PARK CONDO OWNER,
REPRESENTATIVE SARAH BROUGHTON
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12/2/2005
CLOSED BY Denise Driscoll
\
#
,.
J'
'i
I
Ele ~ &ecord ttavkJate FQrm Reports Format rab t!~
.
j !PdlJe ~ .r
1l1l1~ti.....,.,1 :'~I
II2I!!lfill~..iiEH.3~d..!i.,JiI<9E'.;)o.iJ~" "
_ ~ ___-,--._____._._____..___1.__.__._._.__..__._._____._._.__.____~_____
L'?~ ltl ~_~ ~.J
Rooli1o\iiotay I ~ I Subfemit. I \!akJation I I'I4lIcCommenl I Attocliment. I
Mein I Royting Status I AichlEng I Parcel. I Cu.tom Fjeld. I Feel I Fee S"""""'l! I 8etiono I
~~ .
Addr...I210 MIDLAND PARK AVE
Ciy IASPEN
Pennilriamaliorr'- ___un. -------------- - -
104..... Pemil I ~ Rooli1g Queue I....
Project I ~ Slatus lpendiro;j
Deoaipion PUD AMENDMENT TO ALLOW SNYDER PARK CONDO OWNERS TO CONVERT
EXISTING UNFINISHED BASEMENT SPACE IN ANY OF THE 91.BEDRDDM UNITS
INTO A VARIETY OF USES. INCLUDING A BEDROOM AND BATHROOM
Slbmitted ISARAH BROUGHTON C10ck IRumng Days ro
r VIObIo on the web? PemitlD: I 34053
iiI
Appied 105I05l2Offi ~
Approved I 1J/
I-I ~
FNlI ~
E><pi..I0413012006 ~
OWl""
Lad N....ISNYDER PARK HOME OW ~ Fi.t N....I
Phone 1
W 0_1. AppIicont?
AooIconr-" .--.------. ---.--------------------
~i'" ~.
210 MIDLAND AVE
ASPEN CD 81611
..
-,_.......-."'.."".~~" ..,.~"~.>~..'.....,.
_'_.__m.___.._.....__.._....______.._______ m __ __
- -- --------- - _u_ -- -- ,-:.----~'=-===11ii1
!llk,_~<.,.._,,,..^_ ".' _~""~..'~'",'"'._..", ,~'...".,_ _ .. " ,', J'I ki.~
~nIe' the pemit IJlll8 code
-- _'I R8CCId: 1 of 1
/rpprfOtJecJ LJICCtid
OvcD 56 ~ 2cos;
) YCS/03
o
o
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section
26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights",
of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific
development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein.
The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested
property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third
anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved
pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a
revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of
vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any
growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject
to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
Snvder Park Homeowner's Association. 210 Midland Avenue, Aspen. CO 81611
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number
8 I-Bedroom Units approved in original Snvder Park PUD (Ord. 24-1998) (ADA accessible 1-
bedroom unit not included in approval)
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
PUD Amendment to allow for owners to finish the basements in the 8 I-bedroom units
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan
Citv Council Ordinance No. 38. Series of2005, Approved 11/28/05
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
December II, 2005
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
December 12, 2008
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration
and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code.)
Issued this 11 th day of December, 2005, by the City of Aspen Community
Development Director. CM,~
Chris Bendon, Community Development Director
. .
.
construction of the crawl spaces, the contractors ran into soils that were not good load
bearing soils where the floor of the crawl spaces were to be built. In the end, the units
were constructed with full-height, unfinished basements. Several of the units have since
finished their basements, but they have not been allowed to include bedrooms or
bathrooms because of the possible impacts associated with adding bedrooms to the site.
As part of the original application made by the Applicants, the possibility to add
bedrooms to the basements to be finished was requested. However, the Planning and
Zoning Commission felt that the ability to add bedrooms intended for sleeping purposes
to the basements could exacerbate the parking problems that exist on Midland Avenue by
allowing for more people to live within the development. As a result of this concern, the
Applicants revised their application to eliminate the request for bedrooms.
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS HEARING:
At the previous hearing on October II '\ City Council heard a presentation of the land use
request by Staff and the Applicants, considered a recommendation by the Planning and
Zoning Commission, and heard public comments. At the conclusion of the hearing,
several Council members indicated that more information was needed to gauge the
implications that a decision on this issue might have. It was also suggested by Council
that Staff detail the positives and negatives of the various decision options available to
City Council in relation to this land use request. That being the case, Staff has included
the additional information requested by Council and has provided an analysis of the pros
and cons for each of the decision options in the following paragraphs.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
As described above, City Council asked for a variety of additional information in order to
make a decision on the proposed land use request from both Staff and the Applicants. Of
Statl~ Council requested the following information:
. The minutes from the hearings on the original approvals of the Snyder PUD.
. The Housing Authority's policy on renting affordable housing units or bedrooms
within affordable housing units.
. Number of different types (i.e. studio, I-bedroom, 2-bedroom) of units in our
current housing inventory.
. Listing of other affordable housing units in town that have unfinished basements
that could have similar requests to finish their unfinished basements.
. More information on what took place at the Twin Ridge affordable housing
complex.
In response to the request for the minutes from the hearings on the original Snyder Park
approvals, Staff has attached what the Clerk's Office has from the minutes of the 1998
hearings. However, some of the records are missing from the August 10, 1998 meeting
minutes and the minutes (attached as Exhibit "A") we do have do not discuss the
basements. It is the recollection of Community Development Director Chris Bendon
(who acted as the case planner for the City on the original development application) that
- 2 -
affordable housing affordable housing discussion under Staff
developments they may developments they may Comments).
want to finish their want to finish their
unfinished basements. unfinished basements.
(Staff believes the risk (Staff believes the risk
for setting a precedent for setting a precedent
is minimal, please see is minimal, please see
discussion III Staff discussion III Staff
Comments). Comments).
Unit Exoandabilitv and Unit Livabilitv:
As was discussed at the previous hearing on this matter, Staff believes that provisions for
unit expandability are important in the development of affordable housing projects in
order to allow for unit owners to hold onto their units longer as their families grow and
they proceed through different life stages. And in the long run, Staff believes that longer
occupancy of affordable housing units creates neighborhood coherence and character that
we seek in Aspen. At the last hearing, Councilman DeVilbiss asked Staff to further
clarify why we believe that allowing the Applicants to finish their basements would help
to allow for them to keep their units through different life stages even though they would
not have the ability to add a bedroom to the units.
In making the comment that unit expandability would allow for owners to maintain their
units through different life stages, Staff did not necessarily have unit owners that were
looking to have children in mind. Staff had owners that were looking at taking on a
spouse or a significant other in mind with the thought that more useable space within an
existing unit would simply make the unit more livable without having any impacts on the
aesthetics of the units.
Parkinf!: Imvacts:
As was also discussed at the last meeting, Staff believes that the addition of a bedroom to
each of the eight (8) I-bedroom units as was originally requested would have had a
minimal impact on both traffic and parking. The number of off-street parking spaces
provided in the development is two (2) parking spaces for each of the units that contain
two (2) or more bedrooms and one parking space for each of the units that currently
contain one bedroom. Staff felt that the majoritY of the finished basement spaces that
would result from this amendment would likely be used by people that already live in
Snyder Park units and were not likely to create a significant increase in traffic or parking
demand since they are in close proximity to the core of town and on an in-town bus route.
However, the Planning and Zoning Commission indicated that providing for the
possibility of adding an additional bedroom in each of the eight I-bedroom units would
likely exacerbate the parking problems that exist on Midland Avenue. As a compromise,
the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed that it would be acceptable to allow for
the unfinished basements to be finished with a powderoom consisting of at most one
toilet and one sink, but not allowing for the basements to include bedrooms as was
originally requested. The Commission felt that allowing for the basements to be finished
- 5 -
with room uses other than bedrooms would allow for the basement spaces to be used
without likely increasing the number of people that live within the development.
Enforcement o/No Bedroom Rezulation:
At the last meeting, Staff was posed with the question of how to enforce that the
basements would not include bedrooms upon being finished if Council were to accept the
Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation to allow the Applicants to finish
their basements without full bathrooms or bedrooms. The honest answer is that it will be
very difficult for Staff to enforce such a requirement. Staff can make sure that the
basements do not have a closet and a full bathroom upon their completion in doing our
certificate of occupancy inspection. But beyond that, Staff typically relies on citizen
complaints to inform us of zoning violations and in this situation we would likely have to
rely on the Applicants' policing themselves to an extent, by filing a zoning complaint
when they feel that one of their neighbors is improperly using the basement space. Staff
would suggest that improperly using the basement space in this scenario would be renting
the basement space out or having someone beyond their spouse or significant other
occupying the space for more than a short visit.
In discussing the enforcement problem, Staff believes that there will be a similar
enforcement issue if the application is denied in that Staff would have to enforce that the
units would not be allowed to have finished basements. Staff would have to rely on
similar enforcement techniques to those discussed above, in order to prevent the
Applicants from finishing the basements. Therefore, Staff does not believe that the
enforcement issues that would be associated with allowing for the basements to be
finished without bedrooms are any greater than the enforcement problems that would
come about by denying the application.
Concern Over Settinz a Precedent and Chanzinz the Community 's Mix of Units:
During the discussion at the last meeting, several members of Council were concerned
about setting a precedent that would garner requests from other affordable housing
projects wanting to finish their basements. In considering this concern, Staff had the
Housing Authority come up with an inventory of affordable housing units that they
believe have full height, unfinished basements that is included in their memorandum
attached as Exhibit "B". As can be seen by the housing memorandum, there are not
really any units in a similar situation. Additionally, this is a site specific situation and
any other affordable housing units that want to make a similar request would have to be
reviewed on the merits of their individual situation. That being the case, Staff does not
believe that approving or denying the application would establish a precedent.
Another question was raised about whether allowing the basements to be finished with
bedrooms would change the mix of units within the community. In response to this
question, Staff does not believe that adding a bedroom to the units would change the mix
of units if City Council were to add a condition of approval to the proposed ordinance
requiring that the units still be sold as I-bedroom units as was requested by the Housing
Authority in their original referral comments and as has been done at the Twin Ridge and
- 6 -
Common Ground affordable housing complexes. Staff feels that they would simply be
large and likely more desirable I-bedroom units.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached ordinance, approving the
proposed PUD amendment to allow for the basements to be finished, without full
bathrooms or bedrooms, with the conditions contained therein. If City Council believes
that the Applicants should have the ability to finish the basements with a bedroom in each
unit, Staff would recommend that Council add a condition of approval to the proposed
ordinance requiring that the units continue to be sold as I-bedroom units with an office so
that the inventory mix remains unchanged.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the PUD amendment request and
recommended that City Council approve the PUD amendment to allow for the unfinished
basement spaces to be finished with room uses other than bedrooms and full bathrooms.
The Planning and Zoning Commission's resolution and minutes were provided as
attachments to the first reading memorandum.
CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS:
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Ordinance No. 38, Series of 2005, approving with conditions, the
requested PUD amendment to allow for the eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units
(ADA I-bedroom unit not included) in the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD to
finish their basements with room uses other than bedrooms and full bathrooms."
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT A -1998 SNYDER PARK HEARING MINUTES
EXHIBIT B --ADDITIONAL MEMORANDUM FROM THE HOUSING AUTHORITY AND
ASSOCIATED DOCUMENT A T10N
EXHIBIT B - ApPLICATION (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING PACKET)
EXHIBIT C - REFERRAL COMMENTS (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING PACKET)
EXHIBIT D - ORDINANCE No. 24, SERIES OF 1998 (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING
PACKET)
EXHIBIT E - LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING PACKET)
EXHIBIT F - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION (PROVIDED IN FIRST
READING PACKET)
EXHIBIT G - P & Z MINUTES (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING PACKET)
- 7 -
ORDINANCE NO. 38
(SERIES OF 2005)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A PUD
AMENDMENT TO THE SNYDER PARK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
TO ALLOW FOR UNFINISHED BASEMENTS TO BE CONVERTED TO
LIVABLE SPACE AND FINISHED, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, represented by Rowland and Broughton
Architecture and Urban Design, requesting approval of a PUD amendment to allow for
the eight (8) I-bedroom units (ADA accessible I-bedroom unit not included) that were
constructed with unfinished basements to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, City Council approved the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD
pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998, allowing for the construction of six 3-
bedroom and eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units in Snyder Park
SubdivisionlPUD; and,
WHEREAS, the eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units were constructed
with unfinished basements that were not allowed to be finished with bedrooms under the
original development approvals; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development.Department and the AspenlPitkin County Housing Board
recommended approval of the requested amendment to provide the ability for unit owners to
finish the basements in the eight (8) I-bedroom units with additional bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed concerns that
adding bedrooms to the basements to be finished would exacerbate parking issues in the
area; and,
WHEREAS, as a result of the Planning and Zoning Commission's expressed
concerns about the addition of bedrooms exacerbating parking issues in the area, the
Applicant amended their proposal to request to finish the 8 unfinished basements with
room uses other than bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on August 2, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 22, Series of 2005, by a four to zero (4-0)
vote, recommending that City Council approve with conditions, a PUD amendment to the
Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD to allow for the eight (8) I-bedroom units that were
constructed with unfinished basements to finish their basements to include room uses other
than bedrooms and full bathrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on September 26, 2005, City
Council continued the review of this proposal until October II, 2005; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on October II, 2005, City
Council continued the review of this proposal until November 28,2005; and,
.
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on November 28, 2005, the
Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. 38, Series of2005, by a _ to ~ L-
_) vote, approving with conditions, a PUD amendment to the Snyder Park Affordable
Housing PUD to allow for the eight (8) I-bedroom units that were constructed with
unfinished basements to finish their basements to include room uses other than bedrooms
and full bathrooms; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development
proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has
reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the
Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and
considered public comment at a public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds
all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal,
with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community
Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for
the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT:
Section 1:
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
City Council hereby approves a PUD amendment to the Snyder Park PUD allowing for the
unfinished basements in the eight (8) I-bedroom units (not including the ADA accessible 1-
bedroom unit because it does not have an unfinished basement) to be finished, with the
following conditions:
I. A building permit shall be applied for and approved to finish each of the
individual basements. The finished basements shall meet the applicable
building code requirements that are in place at the time of building permit
submittal.
2. The basements shall not contain cooking devices, thereby reinforcing that
the finished basements are not to be used as an additional, stand-alone
dwelling unit
3. The owners of the subject units that finish their basements shall not be
allowed to be reimbursed for more than 10% of the actual costs of capital
improvements to the units upon the initial sale of the improved units
pursuant to the affordable housing guidelines.
4. The basements in the eight I-bedroom units shall not be allowed to
include bedrooms. Bcdrooms are defined as a portion of a dwelling unit
intended to be used for sleeping purposes, which contain closets, have
access to a bathroom and which meet the International Building Code
requirements for light and ventilation. This language shall not preclude
the owners from having the ability to install a powder room (to only
contain at most I toilet and I sink) in the basement as long as the other
rooms are not used for sleeping purposes.
Section 2:
This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 3:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof
Section 4:
A public hearing on this ordinance was held on the 28th day of November, 2005, in the City
Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City
Council of the City of Aspen on the 22nd day of August, 2005.
Helen Kalin Klanderud, Mayor
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved by a vote of _ to _ L--->, this 28th
day of November, 2005.
Helen Kalin Klanderud, Mayor
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
John P. Worcester, City Attorney
Aspen City Council "
Rel!:ular Meetinl!:
f::;xVt,'h It ';;+ If
.-
Julv 13, 1998
Councilmembers Vickery and Markalunas said they would approve an open space
variance in order to accommodate larger units. Councilman Vickery said he does
not support the parking variance nor waiving the school dedication fees.
Councilman Vickery said it is not germane how many kids are on a particular site.
Mayor Pro Tern said she agrees on the parking and would consider waiving the
dedication fees on the affordable housing unit. Councilman Paulson said he would
not approve a parking variance and the applicants should pay the school dedication
fees. Councilman Markalunas agreed. Councilman Vickery said the open space
requirements may determine what type of units this project may have. It is not up to
Council to get RO projects on the site.
Councilman Vickery moved to adopt Ordinance #30, Series of 1998, on fIrst
reading; seconded by Councilman Markalunas. Roll call vote; Councilmembers
Vickery, yes; Paulson, no; Markalunas, yes; Mayor Pro Tern Richards, yes. Motion
carried.
ORDINANCE #24, SERIES OF 1998 - Snyder Park Conceptual & Final PUD;
GMQS Exemption
Councilman Paulson moved to read Ordinance #24, Series of 1998; seconded by
Councilman Markalunas. All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #24
Series of 1998
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING REZONING
FROM PITKIN COUNTY ZONE DISTRICT "MODERATE DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL" (R-lS) TO CITY OF ASPEN ZONE DISTRICT
"AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT" (AHl-PUD);
CONCEPTUAL AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL,
SUBDIVISION APPRO V AL, AN EXEMPTION FROM THE GROWTH
MANAGEMENT COMPETITION AND SCORING PROCEDURES,
APPROVAL OF THE METHOD IN WHICH AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS TO
BE PROVIDED, AND WAIVER OF THE LAND USE APPLICATION,
ZONING, AND PARK DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR THE "SNYDER
PARK" AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PROJECT,
210 MIDLAND AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
was read by the city clerk
13
,~'---
Aspen City Council
Ree:ular Meetine:
July 13. 1998
Chris Bendon, community development department, told Council this site is not in
the city but is surrounded on 3 sides by the city and is proposed for annexation. The
site is 3.2 acres with 2 ponds, increasing slopes to the south. The proposal is to
subdivide the property into 1 acre for housing and 2 acres for parks. The property is
zoned R -15 in the county and would allow subdivision for several houses. Bendon
said this proposal meets the PUD and subdivision regulations, is 15 affordable
housing units. Bendon told Council staff recommends approval with conditions.
The growth management committee recommended approval 6 to 2 with concerns
about creating greater accessibility to the upper courtyard for loading and for
emergency access. P & Z recommended to deny rezoning for the project 3 to 1. P
& Z also considered the residential design standards and parking for the project;
both of these were denied. P & Z's concerns were the design of the project, anival
at the project where the cars are stored.
Dave Tolen, housing director, told Council one of the objectives of the last 2-112
years of work was to design the best possible housing and neighborhood park.
Tolen said the housing office worked closely with the neighbors and with the parks
department Another objective was to provide units of the type that are needed and
also to provide a usable and attractive park. Tolen told Council staff looked at 11
different site designs. Tolen said the two existing ponds have been delineated as
jurisdictional wetlands; there is a steep bench to the south of the site; there is a
stand of mature trees.
Tolen told Council the courtyard scheme for housing is driven by trying to reduce
tlle impact of concrete and automobiles on the site. Tolen showed Council several
previous site designs for a comparative with the one decided on. The current plan
restricts access and parking to the smallest area possible, the buildings are clustered
around a courtyard. This maintains the contiguity of the site as a park. Tolen said
both the growth commission and P & Z questioned the density of 15 affordable units
on this site. Tolen said stafflooked at if there was space for additional buildings,
parking and cars and felt without compromising the park use felt there was not
space for more units. Tolen said staff looked at trading density on this site for
preserving open space in another site. Tolen said staff wanted to preserve this green
space in an already dense neighborhood. Another issue from P & Z is whether
single family homes on a streetscape may be more appropriate. Tolen said this was
looked at in some plans for this site; however, at Snyder an extension of the
streetscape was not appropriate with the topography. Tolen said it is preferable to
cluster the sites and to preserve as much open space as possible.
14
.---,,-
Aspen City Council
Rel!:ular Meetinl!:
Julv 13. 1998
Tolen said P & Z questioned the access and whether it may be inadequate. Tolen
said staff looked at vehicle access balanced against other needs on the site. Tolen
said limited access gives the best possible opportunity to create the best park on this
site. Tolen showed a model of the topography of the site. Tolen explained that
access cannot legally come from the back of the site because it a private road.
Tolen told Council as far as adding units or changing the design, staff worked with
the neighborhood and feel they have gained credibility through this process. Tolen
said to add units or change the design, staff would need to meet with the neighbors.
Tolen told Council the parks director has serious concerns about eliminating the
wetlands on the north of the project and what it would do to the park. There is also
the point that the city would not allow a private developer to eliminate wetlands to
build houses. Tolen told Council they should do a site visit The houses are staked
out, Council can experience how far it is from the cars to the houses.
Rebecca Schickling, assistant parks director, said Council bought this property with
open space funds and to create a park in this area. Staff worked within the natural
features and constraints of the parcel. There is a space where the previous housing
existed, which will be used for the housing. Schickling noted there are 3 ponds on
.
the property. One of these is not considered jurisdictional wetland; it acts as a
sedimentation area for the ditch system and has a lot of concrete. The other 2 ponds
support a wetland cOlmmmity, although they are degraded. These two ponds need
permission from the Army Corps of Engineer to alter or to fill. Schickling said the
city proposes to upgrade the wetlands to be more useful. Schickling told Council
the Army Corps has given the city a permit to begin work upgrading the ponds; this
permit is valid only until March 1999.
Schickling told Council the parks department will improve the ditch and create a
water course through the property. A playground will be added on the front part of
the portion. Staff has been working with the property owner to the north to get a
trail connection through both properties. There will be some picnic shelters.
Schickling said an emphasis through the planning process has been to make sure
there is an attractive and usable park
Dan Sadowski, adjacent neighbor, read a letter into the record. This letter had
signatures of neighbors and said they have followed the process and strongly
approve of the final design as presented by the housing authority. Sadowski said the
neighbors reject P & Z's effort to introduce a major redesign at this point
Sadowski said during the 2 plus year process, many designs were considered and
15
...
Aspen City Council
Ree:ular Meetin2
July 13. 1998
this design was agreed on by all parties involved. Sadowski said this process was a
sterling piece of civic planning.
Tim Mooney, P & Z member and neighbor, said a series of checks and balances
ultimately create the best result for the city and its citizens. Mooney said P & Z
needs to stay within the code requirements when they review project and to review
every project consistently. Mooney said a garage with a two story house on top is
not an ideal situation. Mooney said the city's design review standards particularly
address streetscape, the dominance of the garage as it faces the street. Mooney told
Council the design team stated they would get a variance from Ordinance #30 and
they would not have to comply with the design standards.
Councilman Paulson moved to suspend the rules and extend the meeting to 9:35
p.m.; seconded by Councilman Markalunas. All in favor, motion carried.
Bob Blaich, P & Z member, said this is an excellent site for affordable housing. The
majority ofP & Z felt, however, that more detailed design should be undertaken.
Blaich said P & Z did not have any input until the project was complete. Blaich said
the staff suggests waiving the design review standards. Blaich said many citizens
feel the city has two sets of standards; one for private development and one for
public development. If the city waives the design review standards, it will reinforce
that opinion. At the same time, Council wants to make Ordinance #30 more
stringent. Blaich suggested COlUlcil approve this project without waiving the
residential design standards and also refer the project back to DRAC.
Tolen told Council staffis asking for relief from 2 residential design standards; one
is the houses are not oriented to the street and the garages are on the fronts of the
units as you enter with your vehicle. Tolen said in order to orient the houses to the
street, they would have to all be oriented to Midland avenue or the subdivision
would have to create new streets. David Warner, design team, said if the building
had been skewed to match the tangent line of Midland Avenue, the project would
look out of place in the neighborhood. The orientation is appropriate.
Nick Lebby, adjacent property owner, told Council he has been involved in this
project for about 3 years and it has evolved into a beautiful project. Lebby said
incorporating a park and wetland close to town is a great amenity to the community.
The affordable housing is in a beautiful setting and residents can walk to town.
Lebby said preserving wetlands and trees and open space is what Aspen is about.
Lebby said this was a long process and he appreciates being included in the process.
16
Aspen City Council
Rel!Ular Meetine
July 13. 1998
Tolen said he worked with the fire department on the emergency access and it meets
their requirements. The fire department may use the private road to fight a fire, if
necessary. The housing department has agreed to provide sprinklers for all
structures.
Mayor Pro Tern Richards said she supports this design. Mayor Pro Tern Richards
noted the parks and recreation master plan identified a critical shortage of pocket
parks in this neighborhood. Mayor Pro Tern Richards said she wants this to be a
stellar new park. Mayor Pro Tern Richards said the city may have to compromise
the grid system on this project.
Councilman Paulson moved to suspend the rules and extend the meeting to 9:45
p.m.; seconded by Councilman Markalunas. All in favor, motion carried.
Councilman Markalunas said he feels this is an exemplary project and he supports
the project the way it is. Councilman Markalunas said he likes that the natural
features of the land have been preserved. Councilman Markalunas said in order to
preserve natural beauty, the city needs to build in regulations to reduce the number
of cars and to reward projects with communal cars. Councilman Paulson said he
would like the garages designed so that when one comes into the project, the
garages cannot be seen. Councilman Vickery said he does not feel there are fatal
flaws in the project. Councilman Vickery said between now and second reading,
Council should conduct a site visit and have a work session to see if there are any
ideas that can be incorporated into the plan. Mayor Pro Tern Richards said she does
not want to see the compromise with the neighbors broken.
Councilman Markalunas moved to adopt Ordinance #24, Series of 1998, on first
reading; seconded by Councilman Paulson. Roll call vote; Councilmembers
Paulson, yes; Markalunas, yes; Vickery, yes; Mayor Pro Tern Richards, yes.
Motion carried.
Councilman Paulson moved to adjourn at 9:50 p.m.; seconded by Councilman
Markalunas. All in favor, motion carried.
17
Aspen City Council
Relwlar Meetinl!:
AUl!:ust 10. 1998
Councilwoman Richards amended her motion to include the condition that the
applicant abide by the 25 foot setback off the westersly side of the property;
seconded by Councilman Markalunas.
Reno requested this be tabled at the 25 foot setback is a major issue in putting the
driveway in the middle.
COlmcilwoman Richards withdrew her motion as requested by the applicant;
seconded by Councilman Markalunas. All in favor, motion carried.
Councilwoman Richards moved to continue Ordinance #20, Series of 1998;
seconded by Councilman Paulson. All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #24. SERIES OF 1998 - Snyder Park conceptual & Final PUD;
GMQS Exemption
Chris Bendon, community development department, showed Council the site and
said this property is currently in the cOlmty. The proposal is to subdivide this 3.3
acres parcel into a 1 acre parcel for affordable housing and a 2 plus acre parcel for
park There will be 15 units; 9 one bedroom and 6 three bedroom units. The units
will be a mix of category 3 and 4. Bendon noted in the courtyard area t1lere is an
exceptional view of Aspen moutnain. Some Counciimembers had asked if the
building could be reconfigured so the view from the rear is not so compromised.
The applicant does have some design suggestions.
Bendon told Council P & Z recommended denial 3 to 1 with concerns about having
to carry things from the car park to where the units is locayted; the consition of
arriving where the cars live, and concerns about the view toward Aspen mountain.
Dave Tolen, housing office, showed the desib'Il history of this project starting with
24 units in a duplex configuration covering the entire site except for the wetlands.
Council and staff did a site visit and decided the west and south portions of the site
should be parks and green land. Tolen said in June 1994 staff began working with
the neighborhood on design that would be acceptable. It was felt that 15 units
would be an appropriate number for this site and keep a usable park site. The
scheme best liked by the neighbors and staff has less pavement than previous ones
and focuses the units internally. Tolen said the area to be park was chosen because
of large stands of trees, wetlands and tile area in the back had already been
developed. The entry pavement has been minimized. The housing is clustered. The
7
,
Aspen City Council
Rel!:ular Meetinl!:
AUl!:ust 10. 1998
parking is under some units and also in carports. There is a trail connection to
highway 82 up through Alpine cottages
8
&t1/ 'b't iL;l/1
MEMORANDUM
TO:
James Lindt
FROM:
Cindy Christensen
DATE:
October 24, 2005
RE:
SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT
ISSUE: City Council requested additional information regarding the request from the Snyder
Homeowners' Association regarding finishing the basements with another bedroom and adding a
bathroom.
BACKGROUND: Snyder Park employee housing was approved in 1998 and was sold in March of
2000. The project consists of a total of 15 units - 6 three-bedroom units and 9 one-bedroom units.
The one-bedroom units were originally going to be built for slab-on-grade construction; however,
unfinished basements were added closer to construction. The project was approved with basements
but that no additional bedrooms or bathrooms could be added. The major concern of the neighbors
revolved around potential parking issues. The main issue for the owners has been that in order to
access the bathroom in these one-bedroom units, a guest must go through the owner's bedroom.
It has been the policy of the Housing Board that units be built with the ability for an owner to
expand their unit Providing unfinished basements is a good opportunity for an owner to do so.
City Council requested additional information as follows:
. APCHA' s rental policy in roommate situations;
. How other units in other complexes have been allowed to expand;
. Inventory numbers that include the number of each size of unit within the City; and
. Identification of any other category units in town that may have large unfinished basements
at this time.
APCHA will be bringing forward a change in the Guidelines for the BOCC and City Council to
review relating to roommates. The major concem of the Housing Board and Staff has been if
another person in the household owns other residential property within the Roaring Fork Drainage
System. The policy would allow an owner of a deed restricted unit to rent a room to any individual
as long as the person does not own any other residential property within the Roaring Fork Drainage
System; however, such owner must be residing in the unit full-time and be a qualified employee.
Income, assets, even employment, would not come into play for the roommate as the owner is the
qualified "tenant" However, the rent that would be charged is limited.
There have been other projects within the City and County that have the ability for expansion. Most
of these contained lofts that were enclosed to make a second bedroom. Owners in Twin Ridge and
Common Ground have created an office (bedroom) area. APCHA keeps the unit in the inventory
as it was originally constructed. In other words, if enclosing a loft created another bedroom, this
would be advertised as a one-bedroom unit plus an office. This allows for owners to expand their
units as their families grow, or gives the ability for the owner to have a guest stay over and the
inventory is not affected.
A complete inventory has been provided to the Community Development Department and was
distributed to City Council last year.
As to any other units in town that may have large unfinished basements, Staff is not aware of any
such units in the current inventory.
RECOMMENDATION: The Housing Board and Staff highly recommend the approval of this
request.
2
(fJ
'"
'"
!!l-
Ei
"
:or
'"
0.
Ei
O'
eD
'"
Q
0.
'"
[
o
"
o
"
o
"
"
'"
;;:
:or
-0'
.,
"
0.
m
"
~
<:
2.
;;;
,,'
$l.
'"
o
"-
'"
0.
O'
'<
.;:
"0
"',
.,
m
m
"
~
<:
2.
;;;
Q
"
:or
o'
:or
<:
"
'"
.;:
"0
'"
u;'
"
$l.
'"
"0
'"
<>
~
'"
0.
--
o
"
"
'"
;;:
:or
-0.
--l
o
~
....
c.l
N
CO
;0
'"
"
~
--l
o
~
--l
(J)"Tl:::r-tO
:J.g CD ~:::J
co .... (1) 0 CD
roCoCoCoOJ
, (tl CD CD CD
"T\c.c..c.a.
00 ....., .., .... ..,
3 0 0 0 0
_.0000
':<033033
0) 000010..........
~ OO~N~ON
CD 01......1\.)0)010W
en ~N~~NO~
W
en
...
....
I\J t ~OO())OW
0)
......
N
en
co
en
-I
o
-
III
w w w ::0
~ NOCOOOOO
~ ~wCXl";l"""
.Jlo. -....,J 0-1\,)
--l
"Tl:::r-tO
o CD :E ::I
5i CD 0 (D
0' I I I
olJJtDCDlJJ
-os CD CD CD ro
3 a. a. 0. a.
::+0000
o 0 0 0 0
" 03 03 03 03
0)
o
......
"
o
<:
"
.;:
--l
o
~
"
.,
(fJ-
-'"
<:
0.0
~.
en
"
$l.;o
'" C1>
o ::l
~!!
0.
O'::l
o
SQ-tg
i5. ::l
~'CD*~
o
"
::l
C1>
;;:
:or
is.
3.
o
o
<:
::l
"
--l
(f)"Tl::r-lO
3.g co ~::J
co .., CD 0 CD
(D" Co CoCo Co
I CD CD CD CD
"Tla.a.a...a.
0> ....., .... .... .....
~. g g g g
.:<330303
o
"
::l
'"
iil
::r
o-S'
.,
(fJ-::l
-'"
<: 0
a. 0 -.
i5 ~
~ ......OOWCON......
o O~-..J~~<DN
0>
...... ~N01
~ CO......01CDN,f::o.W
W .j::o. NO>...................
~ ONOgN-....J.t:o.
en
N ~CJ1co......oo:::O
en ~ 0
~ -..JWN~(O.f:l,.
.Jlo. ONO<O N
is'
$l.
--l '"
" ::r --l 0 0
0 m "-
<: " " '"
c '" 0 '" 0.
0 rn W W W ~
0 '" '" '" '"
~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 i
a a a a <:
0 0 0 0 0 0.
" 03 3 3 03 o. -'
~ ~ ... N N ~
IV " ~ w ~ ~ ... W
IV <0
... 0> N " " N
-
g>('")
c -.
il~
" 0
,z~
a....
" III
~"O
a: CD
~ :l
b' III
3 :l
~ Q.
~""[]
~ -.
0-
~ ~
~ ::I
~ ('")
~ 0
=' c
o :l
~~
:J
~ m
=' 3
~'2.
c. 0
5',<
~ CD
;;- CD
"
~ :I:
'00
~ s::::
:'i" tJJ
b' :l
'ilC
-<
I
o
c
~
S'
<0
"
c
5'
~
~
;0
C1>
"
!!
3. 0
0
~ "
0
0-
m
~
w
~
'"
C>
C>
()1
....
CO
CO
CO
Q
.;:
--l
o
~
) l~pV\~~~~~;V\H{ AJ'IAi) 0
I\_~~__ ~vk~\A~ /SSlA'C5 .
coil fuvk:\Ac;; D~p}
~ ~ ~iA.\3~\ V:,oSQMIW("
- ~v V[SUQ! r~~cb
~- V\ CJ r(2 lit (2~Y ~v h~C\J
~ I O,"J ~ (){PQcl-
-= Wi!O f-veJ WO(~ I/k~
C\ Vlo V0t ~
o '0-c ~ ::::l\ () V\ S
--_.......---.,..-._....~._.._._"----,---------_.._". ,. .
P u.b k--- [", ~ w! ~ "^':9
No CoiM1Ms'-vth
c ~\,\\,\c; I Co ClAIM. rQlAL-s
.RC\ckQr COvv\'t-- "i . b(;.ck +0 fi'" iI+~ I V\.5 I
~ F;:C\VLC\1 fl~'\~J-VQllA.S AiOP t-
_ StA.ff<r ~~ ~o /N;\ s r ~
_ .~~~ I/iQ QIV\ w( I \.0'€.q 5
:: Mo-i:o::u ~ II (5)
~ nO co\l1Sfvttl' nfsl21l
Ms
=- OIJ\/V 1/7 /tJafl~
:5Qck- WQS] ~~& I no l a./((JI,J r;V\I~
'- Vl 0 d \ S+"I,t\Cj-II()~ b-f-~((2<t?V(
\;Lair Ja~ ~ _
- S IA PO{\f r~1) b'Qds f bolA c;
- i I C~Q I 1f\t/;1jQ ( -1:mh/ct<< s
- /-low:;; IAj AlAftJ fJf ~y
Ra.cll\ce( - V\~lf ~~f-0 - less /"h/)
tv bt (( t( IA f(2d (jL{ ~
-less {Df'K ;0\~ fJrfr'ls
H~)e,,-- - 54('Jrl- ~/tV'M nV\/o/ or
LA V\ \ +.s- ; ~ 0,[> COMC<fVV\
- 57!kO~} t:~:~~_ u.
r' .--....
\." ./
.,
\111' b
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
Mayor Klanderud and City Council ...JA-A
Joyce Allgaier, Community Development Deputy Director
James Lindt, Senior Planner _~ L
Snyder Park Affordable Housing Project PUD Amendment, 2nd
Reading of Ordinance No. 38, Series of 2005, Public Hearinl!
October 11,2005
DATE:
PROJECT: SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT
REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting a PUD amendment to the Snyder Park
Affordable Housing PUD to allow for the unfinished basements in the
one-bedroom units to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bathrooms.
ZONING: AH/PUD (Affordable Housing/PUD)
LAND USE The Applicant is requesting approval of a PUD amendment to the
REQUESTS: Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD pursuant to the procedures
established in Land Use Code Section 26.445.100(8), Amendment of
PUD development order.
STAFF Staff recommends approval with conditio us.
RECOMMENDATION:
PLANNING AND The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended by a four to zero
ZONING COMMISSION vote that the City Council approve with conditions, a PUD
RECOMMENDATION: amendment to allow for the unfinished basements at Snyder Park to
be finished.
LAND USE ACTIONS REQUESTED:
The Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD.
City Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the PUD amendment
request after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100, Amendment of PUD Development Order.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST AND BACKGROUND:
The Applicant, Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, is requesting a PUD amendment
to amend the PUD that was approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998
(provided in first reading packet). Snyder Park consists of fifteen (15) units in total; six
3-bedroom units and nine I-bedroom units.
The Applicant would like to amend the PUD to allow for the unfinished basements in
eight (8) of the nine I-bedroom units to be finished with a variety of room uses, including
bathrooms. The ninth I-bedroom unit is not proposed for expansion because it is
- I -
"-'
~'- "
currently slab on grade construction. Originally, these units were approved to be built as
slab-on-grade construction with no crawl spaces or basements. When the units were
submitted for building permit, a crawl space was required to be constructed for egress
purposes under each of the units. Subsequently during the excavation for the
construction of the crawl spaces, the contractors ran into soils that were not good load
bearing soils where the floor of the crawl spaces were to be built In the end, the units
were constructed with full-height, unfinished basements. Several of the units have since
finished their basements, but they have not been allowed to include bedrooms or
bathrooms because of the possible impacts associated with adding bedrooms to the site.
As part of the original application made by the Applicant, the possibility to add bedrooms
to the basements to be finished was requested. However, the Planning and Zoning
Commission felt that the ability to add bedrooms intended for sleeping purposes to the
basements could exacerbate the parking problems that exist on Midland Avenue by
allowing for more people to live within the development As result of this concern, the
Applicant revised their application to eliminate the request for bedrooms.
STAFF COMMENTS:
In reviewing the PUD amendment request, Staff feels that the flexibility that would be
provided through this proposal allowing the I-bedroom affordable housing units to finish
their unfinished basements is a positive action. Staff feels that provisions for unit
expandability are important in the development of affordable housing projects in order to
allow for unit owners to hold onto their units longer as their families grow and they
proceed through different life stages. And in the long run, Staff believes that longer
occupancy of affordable housing units creates neighborhood coherence and character that
we seek in Aspen.
The issue of unit expandability received considerable discussion during the recent review
of the Burlingame Ranch Affordable Housing Project and the majority of City Council
felt that it was appropriate to include provisions for unit expandability in the Burlingame
project Applying the same logic to the Snyder Park project that was constructed in 1998,
the Planning Staff and the Housing Board support the proposed request
As far as traffic and parking impacts are concerned, Staff felt that the addition of a
bedroom to each of the eight (8) I-bedroom units as was originally requested would have
had a minimal impact on both traffic and parking. The number of off-street parking
spaces provided in the development is two (2) parking spaces for each of the units that
contain two (2) or more bedrooms and one parking space for each of the units that
currently contain one bedroom. Staff felt that the majority of the finished basement
spaces that would result from this amendment would likely be used by people that
already live in Snyder Park units and were not likely to create a significant increase in
traffic or parking demand since they are in close proximity to the core of town and on an
in-town bus route.
However, the Planning and Zoning Commission indicated that providing for the
possibility of adding an additional bedroom in each of the eight I-bedroom units would
-2 -
likely exacerbate the parking problems that exist on Midland Avenue. As a compromise,
the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed that it would be acceptable to allow for
the unfinished basements to be finished with a powderoom consisting of at most one
toilet and one sink, but not allowing for the basements to include bedrooms as was
originally requested. The Commission felt that allowing for the basements to be finished
with room uses other than bedrooms would allow for the basement spaces to be used
without likely increasing the number of people that live within the development
FIRST READING DISCUSSION:
During first reading of the proposed ordinance, Councilman DeVilbiss requested that the
language in Condition No. 4 be changed to read that the rooms in the basement may
include a powder room as long as the other rooms are not used for sleeping purposes.
The condition as drafted in the first reading ordinance stated that the rooms in the
basement may include a powder room as long as the other rooms are not to be intended to
be used for sleeping purposes. Staff agrees that the slight change in language makes it
clearer that the basements shall not be used for sleeping purposes.
Several members of City Council also expressed that it would be difficult for Staff to
enforce that the basements not be used as bedrooms if they are allowed to be finished. In
response to this issue, Staff believes that the residents in Snyder Park have been very
good at reporting violations in the past and policing their own neighborhood and
complex. In several instances in the past, owners within the Snyder Park complex have
turned other owners into the City for violations.
Keep in mind that only about half of the units within the Snyder Park complex have
basements that are subject to this amendment request, and Staff believes that the other
owners within Snyder Park are not going to want to see these basements occupied by
additional people who do not currently live within Snyder Park. That being said, Staff is
of the opinion that if the use of these basements is getting abused, Staff will likely be
made aware of such abuse and will have to do enforcement pursuant to our standard
zoning enforcement policies.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached ordinance, approvmg the
proposed PUD amendment with the conditions contained therein.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the PUD amendment request and
recommended that City Council approve the PUD amendment to allow for the unfinished
basement spaces to be finished with room uses other than bedrooms and full bathrooms.
The Planning and Zoning Commission's resolution and minutes were provided as
attachments to the first reading memorandum.
- 3 -
,.f
CITYMANAGER'SCOMMENTS:~~' ~rt:.. ~~"'
;:-r (J-hL~~, -w.zI :; Yo ~ ~ a-.:..
JJbo.R A, ~ ~ UA/lc.{ ,&,
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Ordinance No. 38, Series of 2005, approving with conditions, the
requested PUD amendment to allow for the eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units
(ADA I-bedroom unit not included) in the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD to
finish their basements with room uses other than bedrooms and full bathrooms."
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT A - REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS
EXHIBIT B - ApPLICATION (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING PACKET)
EXHIBIT C - REFERRAL COMMENTS (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING PACKET)
EXHIBIT D - ORDINANCE No. 24, SERIES OF 1998 (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING
PACKET)
EXHIBIT E - LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING PACKET)
EXHIBIT F - PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION (PROVIDED IN FIRST
READING PACKET)
EXHIBIT G - P & Z MINUTES (PROVIDED IN FIRST READING PACKET)
-4 -
,
.i
ORDINANCE NO. 38
(SERIES OF 2005)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A PUD
AMENDMENT TO THE SNYDER PARK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
TO ALLOW FOR UNFINISHED BASEMENTS TO BE CONVERTED TO
LIVABLE SPACE AND FINISHED, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, represented by Rowland and Broughton
Architecture and Urban Design, requesting approval of a PUD amendment to allow for
the eight (8) I-bedroom units (ADA accessible I-bedroom unit not included) that were
constructed with unfinished basements to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, City Council approved the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD
pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998, allowing for the construction of six 3-
bedroom and eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units in Snyder Park
Subdivision/PUD; and,
WHEREAS, the eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units were constructed
with unfinished basements that were not allowed to be finished with bedrooms under the
original development approvals; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development Department and the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Board
recommended approval of the requested amendment to provide the ability for unit owners to
finish the basements in the eight (8) I-bedroom units with additional bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed concerns that
adding bedrooms to the basements to be finished would exacerbate parking issues in the
area; and,
WHEREAS, as a result of the Planning and Zoning Commission's expressed
concerns about the addition of bedrooms exacerbating parking issues in the area, the
Applicant amended their proposal to request to finish the 8 unfinished basements with
room uses other than bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on August 2, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 22, Series of 2005, by a four to zero (4-0)
vote, recommending that City Council approve with conditions, a PUD amendment to the
Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD to allow for the eight (8) I-bedroom units that were
constructed with unfinished basements to finish their basements to include room uses other
than bedrooms and full bathrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on September 26, 2005, City
Council continued the review of this proposal until October 11,2005; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on October II, 2005, the Aspen
City Council approved Ordinance No. 38, Series of 2005, by a _ to _ L-~
vote, approving with conditions, a PUD amendment to the Snyder Park Affordable
Housing PUD to allow for the eight (8) I-bedroom units that were constructed with
unfinished basements to finish their basements to include room uses other than bedrooms
and full bathrooms; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development
proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has
reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the
Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and
considered public comment at a public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds
all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal,
with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community
Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for
the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT:
Section 1:
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
City Council hereby approves a PUD amendment to the Snyder Park PUD allowing for the
unfinished basements in the eight (8) I-bedroom units (not including the ADA accessible 1-
bedroom unit because it does not have an unfinished basement) to be finished, with the
following conditions:
I. A building permit shall be applied for and approved to finish each of the
individual basements. The finished basements shall meet the applicable
building code requirements that are in place at the time of building permit
submittal.
2. The basements shall not contain cooking devices, thereby reinforcing that
the finished basements are not to be used as an additional, stand-alone
dwelling unit
3. The owners of the subject units that finish their basements shall not be
allowed to be reimbursed for more than 10% of the actual costs of capital
improvements to the units upon the initial sale of the improved units
pursuant to the affordable housing guidelines.
4. The basements in the eight I-bedroom units shall not be allowed to
include bedrooms. Bedrooms are defined as a portion of a dwelling unit
intended to be used for sleeping purposes, which contain closets, have
'-
access to a bathroom and which meet the International Building Code
requirements for light and ventilation. This language shall not preclude
the owners from having the ability to install a powder room (to only
contain at most I toilet and I sink) in the basement as long as the other
rooms are not used for sleeping purposes.
Section 2:
This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 3:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Section 4:
A public hearing on this ordinance was held on the II th day of October, 2005, in the City
Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City
Council of the City of Aspen on the 22nd day of August, 2005.
Helen Kalin Klanderud, Mayor
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved by a vote of _ to _ L-_), this 11th
day of October, 2005.
Helen Kalin Klanderud, Mayor
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
.John P. Worcester, City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT
Review Criteria & Staff Findings
In accordance with Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, the Applicants have requested
a PUD Amendment
Section 26.445.050, Review Standards: pun Amendment
Section 26.445 of the Regulations provides that development applications for a PUD
amendment must comply with the following standards and requirements.
A. General Requirements.
1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area
Community Plan.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with the affordable housing
goals of the AACP. Staff feels that the amendment will allow for the homeowner's at
Snyder Park to have the flexibility to occupy their units for the long-term and allow for
the units to change with their different life stages allowing them to be vested members of
the community as is encouraged by the Housing section of the AACP. Staff finds this
criterion to be met
2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing
land uses in the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with character of the existing
land uses in the immediate area. The proposed amendment will not change the exterior
aesthetics of the units in that unfinished basements already exist with the necessary
egress. Moreover, the units will continue to be family-oriented affordable housing units.
Staff finds this criterion to be met
3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development
of the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will adversely affect the future
development of the surrounding area in any manner. Thus, Staff finds this criterion not
to be applicable to this application.
4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is
exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the
proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final
PUD development plan review.
- 5 -
Staff Finding
The Applicants have already received the needed GMQS exemptions to construct the
affordable housing, a GMQS exemption is not needed to finish the basements. Staff finds
this criterion not to be applicable.
B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements:
The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for
all properties within the PUD. The dimensional requirements of the underlying
zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for
the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility
with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized.
I. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate
and compatible with the following influences on the property:
a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future
land uses in the surrounding area.
b) Natural and man-made hazards.
c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area
such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and
landforms.
d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and
the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, tran.~it, pedestrian
circulation, parking, and historical resources.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment does not impact the dimensional requirements that were
approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
application.
2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity
of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of
the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment does not impact the dimensional requirements that were
approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
application.
3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established
hased on the following considerations:
a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed
development including any non-residential land uses.
b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking
is proposed
c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities,
including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize
automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development.
- 6 -
d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and
general activity centers in the city.
Staff Finding
As was discussed in the staff memo, Staff feels that many of the bedrooms that would be
added to the basements per the original request would have been occupied by people that
already live within the development. Staff is further of the opinion that the close
proximity of this development to town and to an in-city bus route encourages limited
parking demand for the inhabitants of the development. Nonetheless, the Planning and
Zoning Commission's compromise position not to allow additional bedrooms in the
basement will not increase the parking demand of the site. Staff finds this criterion to be
met.
4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there
exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum
density of a PUD may be reduced if:
a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other
utilities to service the proposed development.
b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal,
and road maintenance to the proposed development.
Staff Finding
Staff has consulted the applicable utility agencies, who have expressed that the adequate
infrastructure exists to accommodate the proposed amendments. Staff finds this criterion
to be met.
5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there
exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the
maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if:
a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground
instability or the possibility of mudflow, rock falls or avalanche dangers.
b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural
watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water
pollution.
c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in
the surrounding area and the City.
d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or
trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or
causes harttiful disturbance to critical natural features of the site.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment does not alter the permitted density of units approved in the
original PUD. Additionally, the proposed amendment involves finishing livable
space that is already incorporated within the subject buildings. Therefore, finishing
the basements shall not have an impact on site drainage, soil erosion or consequential
water pollution. The Applicant also is not requesting to amend the site layout so there
- 7 -
will not be impact on the natural features of the site. Staff finds this criterion to be
met
6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there
exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase
and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding
development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically,
the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if:
a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as
expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area
plan to which the property is subject.
b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and
there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified
in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those
characteristics mitigated.
c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern
compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and
expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics.
Staff Finding
As was discussed in the body of the staff memo, Staff feels that allowing for the eight (8)
unfinished basement spaces to be finished fosters long-term occupancy of the affordable
housing units, which builds neighborhood coherence and character as is encouraged by
the AACP. Staff finds this criterion to be met
B. Site Design:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is
complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent
public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed
development shall comply with the following:
I. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique,
provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to
the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate
manner.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment impacts the site design of the project
Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open
spaces and vistas.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment impacts open spaces or vistas on the
site. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the
urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and
engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement.
- 8-
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact the existing siting of structures on the parcel
and will affect the extent to which the units are visually interesting. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency
and service vehicle access.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not impact the emergency and service
vehicle access that was approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not impact the pedestrian and
handicapped access that was approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not
to be applicable to this application.
6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical
and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding
properties.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact the site drainage since the amendment will
only impact interior space that is already built. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately
de-signed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the
use.
Staff Finding
There are no non-residential land uses proposed as part of this amendment and no non-
residential uses exist within the subject development. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
C. Landscape Plan:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed
landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and
with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed
development shall comply with the following:
- 9 -
1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designed treatment of exterior spaces,
preserving existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity
and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the landscaping plan that
was approved in relation to the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide
uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an
appropriate manner.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the existing natural or
man-made site features any more than the original development plan. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape
features is appropriate.
Staff Finding
The site's landscaping will not be impacted by the proposed amendment. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
D. Architectural Character:
It is the purpose of this standard to encourage architectural interest, variety,
character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City
while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based
upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's
use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public
spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may
sign(ficantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall
be approved as part of the final development plan and architectural character
plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The
proposed architecture of the development shall:
1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city,
appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property,
represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and
respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not alter the architecture and' exterior design of the units in
that the amendment is only requesting to finish interior space. Staff finds this criterion
not to be applicable to this application.
- 10-
2. Incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking
advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use
of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not alter the extent to which the units
incorporate natural heating and cooling systems. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
3. Accommodate the storage and shielding of snow, ice, and water in a safe an
appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the ability at which the
development accommodates the shielding of snow, ice, and water in that the proposed
amendment simply requests to finish interior space that already exists. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
E. Lighting:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be
lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general
aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished:
1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous
interference of any king to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site
features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner.
Staff Finding
The original PUD requires that all exterior lighting meet the lighting code requirements
of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. The proposed amendment will not impact the
development's compliance with the lighting code. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
2. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting
Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD
documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and
lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for
residential development.
Staff Finding
The original PUD requires that all exterior lighting meet the lighting code requirements
of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. The proposed amendment will not impact the
development's compliance with the lighting code. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area:
If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or
recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD,
the following criteria shall be met:
- II -
1. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open
space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed
development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural
landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's
built form, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses
and property users of the PUD.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact common park or open space. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas
is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling
unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner.
Staff Finding
This amendment does not impact the project's compliance with this requirement. Staff
finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through legal instrument for the
permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and
shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential,
commercial, or industrial development.
Staff Finding
This amendment does not impact the project's compliance with this requirement. Staff
finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
H. Utilities and Public Facilities:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose any
undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does
not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public
facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following:
1. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the
development.
Staff Finding
During the review of the original PUD application, it was determined that adequate
public facilities exist to accommodate the proposaL This amendment does not impact the
project's compliance with this requirement. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable
to this application.
2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be
mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer.
- 12-
#""'"
...-,,...
Staff Finding
The affected utility agencies have reviewed the proposed plans and did not express any
public infrastructure concerns. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided
appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the
additional improvement.
Staff Finding
The Applicants are not proposing to install oversized utilities or public facilities and it is
not anticipated that the Applicants will be required by the City to provide oversized
utilities. This amendment will not impact the size of utilities or public facilities that are
needed to accommodate the development. Staff does not find this criterion to be
applicable to this application.
I. Access and Circulation (Only standards 1 & 2 apply to Minor PUD
applications):
The purpose of this ,~tandard is to ensure the development is easily accessible,
does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate
pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security
gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the
following criteria:
J. Each lot, ,"tructure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access
to a public street either directly or through and approved private road. a
pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use.
Staff Finding
This amendment does not impact the development's compliance with this requirement.
Provisions were made in the original PUD approval to insure the adequate access is
provided to the development. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
application.
2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking
arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the
proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be
improved to accommodate the development.
- 13 -
..-........
De.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Mayor Klandywd,amd City Council
Joyce All~olnmunity Development Deputy Director
James Lindt, Senior Planner <3l-
Snyder Park Affordable Housing Project PUD Amendment, 2nd
Reading of Ordinance No. 38, Series of 2005, Public Hearinl!, Ouen
and Continue to October 11th
September 26, 2005
PROJECT: SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT
REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting a pun amendment to the Snyder Park
Affordable Housing pun to allow for the unfinished basements on the
one-bedroom units to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bathrooms.
ZONING: AH/PUD (Affordable Housing/PUn)
LAND USE The Applicant is requesting approval of a pun amendment to the
REQUESTS: Snyder Park Affordable Housing pun pursuant to the procedures
established in Land Use Code Section 26.445.100(8), Amendment of
PUD development order.
STAFF Staff recommends that City Council continue review of this
RECOMMENDATION: application to October 11th.
PLANNING AND The Plauniug aud Zoning Commission recommended by a four to zero
ZONING COMMISSION vote that the City Council approve with conditions, a pun
RECOMMENDATION: amendment to allow for the unfinished basemeuts at Snyder Park to
be finished.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Due to the other significant agenda items scheduled to be reviewed at the September 26th
meeting, Staff would recommend that the review of this application be continued to
October 11 th The Applicants have agreed to a continuation of the review until October
11th
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council continue review of the Snyder Park PUD
amendment to October 11th.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: (ALL MOTIONS ARE MADE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE)
"I move to continue review of the Snyder Park PUD amendment to October II th."
- I -
t""'\
,-",,,.
---
ATTACHMENT 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
llO ~ ltw-.
OcbLhpA/' 1/, 'L{JO S
. Aspen, CO
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
,200_
STATE OF COWRADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I, S?\,\at.iI'\ i7\ItN,~Vl~ (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certifY that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
-X Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
~ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed ofletters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the ~ day of
,200--, to and including the date and time of the public
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
X Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government,
school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that
owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next poge)
~
c
"'"'"
, .)
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public
inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
~~
Signature
Th~"Affidavit of Notice" was acknOwledgedi3efore mhhs 1L day
of ,2005:by .c:o ra.h) f'rr,r ,r./
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
ATTACHMENTS:
COPYOFIHE PUBLICATION
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BY MAIL
o
~
"'.../
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, September 26, 2005
at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130
S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the Snyder Park Homeowner's
Association, 210 Midland Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611, requesting approval of a PUD amendment
to the approved Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD to allow for eight of the I-bedroom units
within the development to finish their unfinished basements. The properties subject to the
application are legally described as units in the Snyder Park Subdivision/PUD. For further
information, contact James Lindt at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130
S. Galena St, Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2763,jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us.
s/Helen Kalin Klanderud. Mavor
Aspen City Council
Published in the Aspen Times on September 11, 2005
City of Aspen Account
..l<A1l1 <AlIU ;)IIIUU~": n\:o; '-lllhh'J
Use Avery@TEMPLATE 5160'"
121 ROBINSON ROAD LLC
600 E HOPKINS AVE #205
ASPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN ELF
4301 ARCADY
DALLAS, TX 75205
BENNETT NEIL J
PO BOX 9937
ASPEN, CO 81612
BYRNES JAMES ROBERT & VALERIE P
90 CLAY LN
ASPEN, CO 81611
CORBIN MARCIA A
PO BOX 9312
ASPEN, CO 81612
-.JNOHO LARRY D & CAROL A
19105 HOLBERTON LN
BROOKVILLE, MD 20833
FISH EILEEN M 1/3 INT
6482 CHERRY CT
NIWOT, CO 80503
HACH STEPHEN C
23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD
ASPEN, CO 81611
HARRIS NORMAN LINDSAY JR
146 ARDMORE DR
ASPEN, CO 81611
!-,CMMING GREGG S
30X 622
".oPEN, CO 81612
@09LS @A1I3I\V ~
"'.."'..-............."........,..
-
1-800-GO-AVERY.___
,......"',
ADAIR ARJA P JR
5375 S GENEVA WY
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111
BANNEROT KARIN SOFIA
43A SMUGGLER GROVE RD
ASPEN, CO 81611
BEYER ALAN R
410 N MILL ST #B11
ASPEN, CO 81611
CITY OF ASPEN
130 S GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
COSTLEY JAMES J
PO BOX 884
ASPEN, CO 81612
ELA CHARLES S
1208 E HOPKINS
ASPEN, CO 81611
GROSZ COLLEEN A TRUST
155 N HARBOR DR #3612
CHICAGO, IL 60601
HALPERIN ALEXANDRA
PO BOX 2210
ASPEN, CO 81612
HARRISON MARK N 2/3 INT
6482 CHERRY CT
NIWOT, CO 80503
HEYMAN BRUCE ALAN & VICKI S
CIO GOLDMANSACHS & CO
2035 N MAGNOLIA
CHICAGO,IL 60614
A1I3Nd-O!l-00a-L
WO)',{jaAE'MMM
-
-
~ MV..",;,'"' "OU~
AMES MARTHA E
23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD
ASPEN, CO 81611
BEIDLEMAN NEAL J & AMY G
PO BOX 4362
ASPEN, CO 81612
BROWN RUTH H
410 N MILL ST #B11
ASPEN, CO 81611
CONANT RICHARD H
55 SMUGGLER GROVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
DEJEAN FELIX A III & CAROL YNE
1368 KATHERINE DR
OPELOUSAS, LA 70570
ELLIOTT ELYSE
610 W NORTH ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
GULL EVAN H REV TRUST
25 ARDMORE CT
ASPEN, CO 81611
HARRIS GEORGE WALTER III
PO BOX 11005
ASPEN, CO 81612
HEJDUK MILAN
C/O JIRI CRHA
16390 BRAEBURN RIDGE TRAIL
DELRA Y BEACH, FL 33446
HYDER GENE MICHAEL
320 MIDLAND AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
@09LS weqe6 al2as!l!~n
ap!deJ a6eqJ\ls ~ ~a a6eJmoq!~ue uo!ssaJdWI
Jam and Smudge fr~e Prlntmg
Use Avery@TEMPLATE S160@
KAL TEN BOCK ERNST
1612 WOODBINE HEIGHTS BLVD
TORONTO ONTARIO CANADA, M4B
3A4
MACALPINE GORDON A
PO BOX 5043
ASPEN, CO 81612
PEARL JILL
1207 E HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
RODBELL PHYLLIS
1101 CREST VALLEY DR
ATLANTA,GA 30327
SADOWSKY DANIEL
PO BOX 2210
ASPEN, CO 81612
~ON FAMILY QPRT
<.;10 CHARLES SIMON
1800 NE 114TH ST PH3
NORTH MIAMI, FL 33181
WANG EDWARD 0 30%
1406 MAIN ST
EVANSTON, IL 60201
(j)09~S @A1I3^" @
-
-
www.avery.com
1-800-GO-AVERV-.
......
KNUTSON RODNEY 0
PO BOX YY
ASPEN, CO 81612
MCPHERSON GREGORY J
PO BOX 2073
ASPEN, CO 81612
RASTEGAR All REZA
8403 WESTGLEN DR STE 100
HOUSTON, TX 77063
RODELL TIMOTHY C & MARJORIE M
PO BOX 8005
ASPEN, CO 81612-8005
SEGUIN MIKE A
PO BOX 1914
ASPEN, CO 81612
SNELL NANCY L
PO BOX YY
ASPEN, CO 81612
WANG KARINA
1319 CRAIN STREET
EVANSTON,IL 60202
AlJ3^\f-09-008-~
WO)'!.JaA(!'MMM
-
-
~ AVERY@ S160@
LEBBY NICK & SARA
PO BOX 1352
ASPEN, CO 81612
MILLER DAWN & STEPHEN H
3401 N MOORINGS WAY
COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133
ROBINSON JACK A & AVIVA
1589 KIRKWAY
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302
ROSE JAMES JAY
PO BOX 2096
ASPEN, CO 81612
SHECHTER IRVING
TRUSTEE OF SHECHTER TRUST
1794 WINTERWARM RD
F ALLBROOK, CA 92028
SPECTOR LORRAINE STAVE TRST
SPECTOR LORRAINE & PAT TRSTE
3 FAIR OAKS
LADUE, MO 63124
WHRJ3 LLC
32205 BINGHAM RD
BINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025
, (j)09~5 ~!Jeqe6 al zas!l!ln
ap!deJ a6eq)\,s ~ ~a a6eJmoqllue uo!ssaJdWI
o
()
Jam and Smudge Free Printing
Use Avery@TEMPLATE S160@
KAL TENBOCK ERNST
1612 WOODBINE HEIGHTS BLVD
TORONTO ONTARIO CANADA, M4B
3A4
MACALPINE GORDON A
PO BOX 5043
ASPEN, CO 81612
PEARL JILL
1207 E HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
RODBELL PHYLLIS
1101 CREST VALLEY DR
ATLANTA, GA 30327
SADOWSKY DANIEL
PO BOX 2210
ASPEN, CO 81612
i SIMON FAMILY QPRT
CIO CHARLES SIMON
, 1800 NE 114TH ST PH3
, NORTH MIAMI, FL 33181
I
,
WANG EDWARD 0 30%
1406 MAIN ST
EVANSTON,IL 60201
@09LS @AH:JAV \t\
-
www.avery.com.....
1-BOO-GO-AVEI
"'"
-
>, '
KNUTSON RODNEY 0
PO BOX YY
ASPEN, CO 81612
MCPHERSON GREGORY J
PO BOX 2073
ASPEN, CO 81612
RASTEGAR All REZA
8403 WESTGLEN DR STE 100
HOUSTON, TX 77063
I,
RODELL TIMOTHY C & MARJORIE M
. I PO BOX 8005
. ASPEN, CO 81612-8005
I SEGUIN MIKE A
, : PO BOX 1914
ASPEN, CO 81612
, SNELL NANCY L
, PO BOX YY
ASPEN, CO 81612
WANG KARINA
1319 CRAIN STREET
, , EVANSTON, IL 60202
,
I:
!i
A1I3^"-Q9-00B-L
WO)oAlaAeoMMM
-
-
~ AVERY@ 5160@
LEBBY NICK & SARA
PO BOX 1352
ASPEN, CO 81612
MILLER DAWN & STEPHEN H
3401 N MOORINGS WAY
COCONUT GROVE, Fl 33133
ROBINSON JACK A & AVIVA
11589 KIRKWAY
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302
ROSE JAMES JAY
, PO BOX 2096
: ASPEN, CO 81612
SHECHTER IRVING
TRUSTEE OF SHECHTER TRUST
1794 WINTERWARM RD
FALLBROOK, CA 92028
SPECTOR LORRAINE STAVE TRST
SPECTOR LORRAINE & PAT TRSTE
, 3 FAIR OAKS
, ! LADUE, MO 63124
, WHRJ3 LLC
, 32205 BINGHAM RD
I I BINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025
I,
;1
I'
II
@09LS ~!Jeqe6 el zes!l!~n
ep!deJ e6e43!,s ~ ~e e6eJJnoq!~ue uo!ssaJdWI
ATTACHMENT 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDR"" O"RO""" , <; V\ \Jdd' fj:v~
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ~/U ()_
, Aspen, CO
,200_
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ".
County of Pitkin )
I, ~ ~ C~ I JL{ I(? _ c, L _ I {t /l cl ~. (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
-4 Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
_ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from1the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was no.t less than twenty-two (22) inches wi~e
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed ofletters not
less than one inch in height Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of
, 200_, to and including the date and time of the public
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
_ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in~'3ection
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class po~ge
prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government,
school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that
owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal ofthis Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public
inspection in the plamling agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
t:?A(r7 RcXZdl
gnature
~
The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was aCknOWledge~is/d day
of-:;" i:!h , 200S, byc:::5~
PUBliC N011Cf.
REo' 5NYDER pARK pUD AM G N~hat a public
. NOTICE \S HEREBYM d y s<ptember 26,
h \d on 0 a, h
hearing will ~ e b in 5:00 p.m. Delore t e
200S at a meetlng:o ~II Chambers, City ".all,
'onPlI City Councll,Co 'del all apP\lCa-
N>..~ As II to cons! ,
nO s, Galena St., pe, p II. Homeowner 5
" db the Snyder aT cO
t\OIl sublU1tte Y \d\and Avenue, Aspen,
Association, 210 M \ I a pUD amendment
B16\1 requesting approva 0, '1Iordab1e Housing
. dS yderPar I-l. .
\0 tne approve n h \ bedroom uIllis
light 01 t e . . .A
pUD to allow or e I' 'oh their unUllIsh""
\ roeotto lnl~ .
within tM deve op erlies subiect to the 3Pphca.
UaSements. The prop "bed 5 unils in the Snyder
tion are\egaUy descn a
parkSuOdlviSion/PU~. contact James Lindt a\
for further illtormatlOn, \ty Development De-
the City ot Aspell comll)l,~un Aspen, CO. (910) 429-
t r,W S Galena ~l",
partmen, .' nJ.~'us"
2163, james\@CI.3Spe. Il Kalin Klanderud, Mayo~
s/H e Aspen City Council
( o'ptember n,
A nTlmesonJ<;
published in the spe
2005.(3053)
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
My commission expires: t.t /~~/o~
ATTACHMENTS:
'PY OF THE PUBLICATION
[OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
~d.",-oWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BY MAIL
Page 1 of 1
-
"'.,.'"
ji'<
"it'"
,.,;(.,..;
Dear Mr. Lindt,
\" -e.u\""',.,,(
()Je... f<.v..ec.v 0'-''( ~'fe.Vl..J'-;':> 0 ':;
4-<> -tL.. IJ-u-J ~,;.. ~ ~
S:-b-r-(o~ r~ fu 6) 'I)~II.tofv--J
~ t- & "5,+ It'll
LI" I~ \noD 'jJ"
We received the Public Notice regarding the SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT. H,-1. //~
We own the property at 211 Midland Ave, directly across from Snyder Park. ~ ~
Please inform us of the procedure to object to this Amendment since we will not be able to attend the public
hearing.
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
"Joseph Grosz" <jg@premierinvest.net>
"james Iindt" <jamesl@cLaspen.co.us>
Tuesday, June 14, 2005 2:05 PM
210 Midland Ave, Aspen, Co
~h Grosz
We strongly object to the increase in finished space. This will allow additional occupancy without
additional parking. The Snyder development currently has more cars per occupant than can be parked inside the
complex and that does not address visitors. The current parking situation at Snyder development is causing
problems for us at 211 Midland. Cars belonging to the occupants and visitors are parked in violation of the
parking restrictions for the street of 2 hour limits for park use. They are NOT using the park and they are way
beyond the two hours. (Days beyond at times) It is almost impossible to get out of our driveway in the winter
and difficult in the summer. The posted parking signs are being ignored and the police NEVER enforce the two
hour parking limit, while using the Park. The Police only act after phone calls informing them the car has
been parked for longer than a few days.
What is the FAR for these units at Snyder? It seems to us that they probably have maxed the allowed FAR at
time of original construction.
PARKING IS A MAJOR PROBLEM, IN THE WINTER when owners/occupants/visitors from SNYDER
DEVELOPMENT park their CARS OVERNIGHT AND IT SNOWS. THE STREET CANNOT BE CLEANED BY
SNOWPLOWS CAUSING ICING AND THEREFORE MAJOR SLIDING PROBLEMS FOR ACCESS TO OUR
DRIVEWAY.
MORE BEDROOMS WILL EQUATE TO MORE CARS AND THEREFORE, WE STRONGLY OBJECT TO THE
APPROVAL OF THIS AMENDMENT.
We realize everyone would like more space in Aspen to accommodate more friends and family (or renters) but
every lucky person who was able to purchase in Snyder Park knew the limitations of their great investment. If it is
too small for them they need to sell to someone with less space needs.
Thank you for the assistance.
Colleen and Joseph Grosz
211 Midland Ave
Aspen
312-856-0032
6/14/2005
-
.....
1-
""'"
'V\\ b
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Mayor Klanderud and City Council ~
Joyce Allgaier, Community Development Deputy Director
James Lindt, Senior PlanneuL
Snyder Park Affordable Housing Project PUD Amendment, 1st
Reading of Ordinance No~, Series of 2005, Public Hearinl! to be
held on September 26, 2005
August 22, 2005
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
PROJECT: SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT
REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting a PUD amendment to the Snyder Park
Affordable Housing PUD to allow for the unfinished basements on the
one-bedroom units to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bathrooms.
ZONING: AHlPUD (Affordable Housing/PUD)
LAND USE The Applicant is requesting approval of a PUD amendment to the
REQUESTS: Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD pursuant to the procedures
established in Land Use Code Section 26.445.100(B), Amendment of
PUD development order.
STAFF Staff recommends approval with conditions.
RECOMMENDATION:
PLANNING AND The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended by a four to zero
ZONING COMMTSSION vote that the City Council approve with conditions, a PUD
RECOMMENDATION: amendment to allow for the unfinished basements at Snyder Park to
be finished.
LAND USE ACTIONS REQUESTED:
The Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD.
City Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the PUD amendment
request after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100, Amendment of PUD Development Order.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST AND BACKGROUND:
The Applicant, Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, is requesting a PUD amendment
to amend the PUD that was approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998
(attached as Exhibit "D"). Snyder Park consists of fifteen (15) units in total; six 3-
bedroom units and nine I-bedroom units.
The Applicant would like to amend the PUD to allow for the unfinished basements in
eight (8) of the nine I-bedroom units to be finished with a variety of room uses, including
- I -
o
'0
bathrooms. The ninth I-bedroom unit is not proposed for expansion because it is
currently slab on grade construction. Originally, these units were approved to be built as
slab-on-grade construction with no crawl spaces or basements. However, when the units
came in for building permit, a crawl space was required to be constructed for egress
purposes under each of the units. Subsequently during the excavation for the
construction of the crawl spaces, the contractors ran into soils that were not good load
bearing soils where the floor of the crawl spaces were to be built. In the end, the units
were constructed with full-height, unfinished basements. Several of the units have since
finished their basements, but they have not been allowed to include bedrooms or
bathrooms because of the possible impacts associated with adding bedrooms to the site.
As part of the original application made by the Applicant, the possibility to add bedrooms
to the basements to be finished was requested. However, the Planning and Zoning
Commission felt that the ability to add bedrooms intended for sleeping purposes to the
basements would possibly exacerbate the parking problems that exist on Midland Avenue
by allowing for more people to live within the development. As result of this concern,
the Applicant revised their application to eliminate the request for bedrooms.
STAFF COMMENTS:
In reviewing the PUD amendment request, Staff feels that the flexibility that would be
provided through this proposal allowing the i-bedroom affordable housing units to finish
their unfinished basements is a positive action. As the application asserts, Staff feels that
provisions for unit expandability are important in the development of affordable housing
projects in order to allow for unit owners to hold onto their units longer as their families
grow and they proceed through different life stages. And in the long run, Staff believes
that longer occupancy of affordable housing units builds neighborhood coherence and
character that we seek in Aspen.
The issue of unit expandability received considerable discussion during the recent review
of the Burlingame Affordable Housing Project and the majority of City Council felt that
it was appropriate to include provisions for unit expandability in the Burlingame project.
Applying the same logic to the Snyder Park project that was constructed in 1998, the
Planning Staff and the Housing Board support the proposed request.
As far as traffic and parking impacts are concerned, Staff felt that the addition of a
bedroom to each of the eight (8) i-bedroom units as was originally requested would have
had a minimal impact on both traffic and parking. The number of off-street parking
spaces provided in the development is two (2) parking spaces for each of the units that
contain two (2) or more bedrooms and one parking space for each of the units that
currently contain one bedroom. Staff felt that the majority of the finished basement
spaces that would result from this amendment would likely be used by people that
already live in Snyder Park units and were not likely to create a significant increase in
traffic or parking demand since they are in close proximity to the core of town and on an
in-town bus route.
- 2 -
.
o
-
. I
,'"
ORDINANCE NO.~'&
(SERIES OF 2005)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A PUD
AMENDMENT TO THE SNYDER PARK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
TO ALLOW FOR UNFINISHED BASEMENTS TO BE CONVERTED TO
LIVABLE SPACE AND FINISHED, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, represented by Rowland and Broughton
Architecture and Urban Design, requesting approval of a PUD amendment to allow for
the eight (8) I-bedroom units (ADA accessible I-bedroom unit not included) that were
constructed with unfinished basements to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, City Council approved the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD
pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998, allowing for the construction of six 3-
bedroom and eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units in Snyder Park
Subdivision/PUD; and,
WHEREAS, the eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units were constructed
with unfinished basements that were not allowed to be finished with bedrooms under the
original development approvals; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development Department and the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Board
recommended approval of the requested amendment to provide the ability for unit owners to
finish the basements in the eight (8) I-bedroom units with additional bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed concerns that
adding bedrooms to the basements to be finished would exacerbate parking issues in the
area; and,
WHEREAS, as a result of the Planning and Zoning Commission's expressed
concerns about the addition of bedrooms exacerbating parking issues in the area, the
Applicant amended their proposal to request to finish the 8 unfinished basements with
room uses other than bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on August 2, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 22, Series of 2005, by a four to zero (4-0)
vote, recommending that City Council approve with conditions, a PUD amendment to the
Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD to allow for the eight (8) I-bedroom units that were
constructed with unfinished basements to finish their basements to include room uses other
than bedrooms and full bathrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a public hearing on September 26, 2005, the Aspen City
Council approved Ordinance No. _' Series of 2005, by a _ to _ L---.J vote,
approving with conditions, a PUD amendment to the Snyder Park Affordable Housing
f."....
,
contain at most I toilet and I sink) in the basement as long as the other
rooms are not intended to be used for sleeping purposes.
Section 2:
This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such
prioT ordinances.
Section 3:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
Section 4:
A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 26th day of September, 2005, in the
City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City
Council of the City of Aspen on the 22nd day of August, 2005.
Helen Kalin Klanderud, Mayor
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved by a vote of _ to _ L---..J, this 26th
day of September, 2005.
Helen Kalin Klanderud, Mayor
Attest:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
John P. Worcester, City Attorney
/""""
EXHIBIT A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT
Review Criteria & Staff Findings
In accordance with Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, the Applicants have requested
a PUD Amendment.
Section 26.445.050, Review Standards: PUD Amendment
Section 26.445 of the Regulations provides that development applications for a PUD
amendment must comply with the following standards and requirements.
A. General Requirements.
1. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area
Community Plan.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with the affordable housing
goals of the AACP. Staff feels that the amendment will allow for the homeowner's at
Snyder Park to have the flexibility to occupy their units for the long-term and allow for
the units to change with their different life stages allowing them to be vested members of
the community as is encouraged by the Housing section of the AACP. Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing
land uses in the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with character of the existing
land uses in the immediate area. The proposed amendment will not change the exterior
aesthetics of the units in that unfinished basements already exist with the necessary
egress. Moreover, the units will continue to be family-oriented affordable housing units.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development
of the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will adversely affect the future
development of the surrounding area in any manner. Thus, Staff finds this criterion not
to be applicable to this application.
4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is
exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the
proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final
PUD development plan review.
- 4 -
o
Staff Finding
The Applicants have already received the needed GMQS exemptions to construct the
affordable housing, a GMQS exemption is not needed to finish the basements. Staff finds
this criterion not to be applicable.
B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements:
The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for
all properties within the PUD. The dimensional requirements of the underlying
zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for
the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility
with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized.
1. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate
and compatible with the following influences on the property:
a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future
land uses in the surrounding area.
b) Natural and man-made hazards.
c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area
such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and
landforms.
d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and
the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian
circulation, parking, and historical resources.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment does not impact the dimensional requirements that were
approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
application.
2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity
of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of
the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment does not impact the dimensional requirements that were
approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
application.
3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established
based on the following considerations:
a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed
development including any non-residential land uses.
b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking
is proposed
c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities,
including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize
automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development.
- 5 -
_~_",.-~>-__o~..,,,. .~.~..~"~.~_,_....~.-.-,_
.~~.;,
will not be impact on the natural features of the site. Staff finds this criterion to be
met
6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there
exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase
and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding
development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically,
the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if:
a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as
expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area
plan to which the property is subject.
b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and
there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified
in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those
characteristics mitigated.
c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern
compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and
expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics.
Staff Finding
As was discussed in the body of the staff memo, Staff feels that allowing for the eight (8)
unfinished basement spaces to be finished fosters long-term occupancy of the affordable
housing units, which builds neighborhood coherence and character as is encouraged by
the AACP. Staff finds this criterion to be met
B. Site Design:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is
complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent
public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed
development shall comply with the following:
1. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique,
provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to
the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate
manner.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment impacts the site design of the project
Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open
spaces and vistas.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment impacts open spaces or vistas on the
site. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the
urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and
engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement.
- 7 -
~
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact the existing siting of structures on the parcel
and will affect the extent to which the units are visually interesting. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency
and service vehicle access.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not impact the emergency and service
vehicle access that was approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not impact the pedestrian and
handicapped access that was approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not
to be applicable to this application.
6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical
and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding
properties.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact the site drainage since the amendment will
only impact interior space that is already built. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately
de-signed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the
use.
Staff Finding
There are no non-residential land uses proposed as part of this amendment and no non-
residential uses exist within the subject development. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
C. Landscape Plan:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed
landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and
with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed
development shall comply with the following:
- 8-
.--
,.
1. The landscape plan exhibits a well designed treatment of exterior spaces,
preserving existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity
and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the landscaping plan that
was approved in relation to the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide
uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an
appropriate manner.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the existing natural or
man-made site features any more than the original development plan. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape
features is appropriate.
Staff Finding
The site's landscaping will not be impacted by the proposed amendment. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
D. Architectural Character:
It is the purpose of this standard to encourage architectural interest, variety,
character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City
while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based
upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's
use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public
spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may
significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall
be approved as part of the final development plan and architectural character
plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The
proposed architecture of the development shall:
1. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city,
appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property,
represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and
respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not alter the architecture and exterior design of the units in
that the amendment is only requesting to finish interior space. Staff finds this criterion
not to be applicable to this application.
- 9 -
o
8
2. Incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking
advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use
of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not alter the extent to which the units
incorporate natural heating and cooling systems. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
3. Accommodate the storage and shielding of snow, ice, and water in a safe an
appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the ability at which the
development accommodates the shielding of snow, ice, and water in that the proposed
amendment simply requests to finish interior space that already exists. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
E. Lighting:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be
lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general
aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished:
1. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous
interference of any king to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site
features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner.
Staff Finding
The original PUD requires that all exterior lighting meet the lighting code requirements
of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. The proposed amendment will not impact the
development's compliance with the lighting code. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
2. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting
Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD
documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and
lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for
residential development.
Staff Finding
The original PUD requires that all exterior lighting meet the lighting code requirements
of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. The proposed amendment will not impact the
development's compliance with the lighting code. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area:
If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or
recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD,
the following criteria shall be met:
- 10-
, ,
Staff Finding
The affected utility agencies have reviewed the proposed plans and did not express any
public infrastructure concerns. Staff finds this criterion to be met
3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided
appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the
additional improvement.
Staff Finding
The Applicants are not proposing to install oversized utilities or public facilities and it is
not anticipated that the Applicants will be required by the City to provide oversized
utilities. This amendment will not impact the size of utilities or public facilities that are
needed to accommodate the development Staff does not find this criterion to be
applicable to this application.
1. Access and Circulation (Only standards 1 & 2 apply to Minor PUD
applications):
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible,
does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate
pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security
gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the
following criteria:
1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access
to a public street either directly or through and approved private road, a
pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use.
Staff Finding
This amendment does not impact the development's compliance with this requirement
Provisions were made in the original PUD approval to insure the adequate access is
provided to the development Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
application.
2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking
arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the
proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be
improved to accommodate the development.
- 12-
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the vehicular access points approved as part of the original
development do not create traffic congestion on the surrounding roads. This amendment
will not impact the development's compliance with this requirement. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
J. Phasing of Development Plan.
The purpose of these criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not
create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners
and impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. If phasing of the
development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adopted final
PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the following:
1. All phases, including the initial phase, shall be designed to function as a
complete development and shall not be reliant on .mbsequent phases.
2. The phasing plan describes physical areas insulating, to the extent
practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases.
3. The proposed phasing plan ensures the necessary or proportionate
improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu,
construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the PUD,
construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation
measures are realized concurrent or prior to the respective impacts
associated with the phase.
Staff Finding
It is anticipated that all of the unit owners will not finish their basements right way upon
approvaL The required park development impact fees shall be assessed in conjunction
with issuance of a building permit to finish each individual basement. Each individual
building permit shall require a construction management plan to minimize construction
impacts on neighboring property owners. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
- 13-
-
-
".J
rowland+broughton
architecture and urban design
27 April 2005
City of Aspen Community Development
City of Aspen Housing Department
Re: Snyder Park PUD Amendment
Dear Sirs and Madams,
Rowland + Broughton Architecture and Urban Design is representing the homeowner's at Snyder
Park Affordable Housing Planned Unit Development in seeking a PUD Amendment.
Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD was approved in 1998. It has since been built with (15)
affordable housing units, (6) three-bedroom units and (9) one-bedroom units. The one-bedroom
units were all built with unfinished basements and window wells for egress. The plans originally
called for slab on grade construction; however basements were added closer to construction.
The owners of the one-bedroom units are interested in being able to fit-out their unfinished
basements into a variety of uses. These uses include: home offices, playrooms, storage, bedrooms
and bathrooms. Under the current approved PUD, additional bedrooms and bathrooms are not
allowed.
This application is asking for a PUD Amendment to allow the homeowners at Snyder Park the option
to convert existing, unfinished basement space into a variety of different uses, including the possibility
of a bedroom and bathroom.
The review standards relevant to this application are the land use code for Planned Unit Development,
Chapter 26.445. Specifically for our PUD Amendment, the following items apply:
26.445.050.A. 1- The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan.
Allowing for an additional bedroom and bathroom to be developed in the unfinished basements at
Snyder Park directly relates to the goal of Aspen's affordable housing program to build community.
Our community is based on a healthy mix of people, who can call Aspen home. Flexibility is a key
component in creating the mix of people. Young people move to Aspen, often find a partner and
possibly start a family. Our housing needs to allow for the flexibility of life and encourage roots to be
established.
26.445.050.A.2- The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land
uses in the surrounding area.
The east side of town is residential and is going through a major redevelopment. As house prices
soar, more locals are forced out of the City. By allowing for an additional bedroom and bathroom to
be developed in the unfinished basements, homeowners at Snyder Park will have more options to
remain in residency in the City. The option to develop the unfinished basements gives the
homeowner the ability to add value to their property all within the Housing Department's guidelines.
1 of 2.
~) :::..:~
:.:;{::--:,-;
~r ~.~
""'~
<",0
<,,0
?E""-l(D
ag:::,
".. 0
-"-0
....'0
a~~
g-; ~
0.. ~
c-..
10.....
".~-
o~~
"- .
OC-D)
0.. ..
3~'O
< ..
+ ell :::l
o~ n
_n 0
=0
~03~
00",
_N_
00_
:etn.;.
or'- _
5..~~
"0 "
_",0
o. 0,
c"'...
100..
".",.
-' '"
o~o
~"'o
0.....0)
o to).;
3,. _
;:;'"
0"
",?
.",
"'..
0...
",.
. to>
-..
"'''
~'"
~,
.'"
"
Snyder Pari< PUD Amendment Application
26.445.050.8.6- The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a
significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattem is
compatible with its surrounding development patterns and with the site's physical constraints.
Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if:
a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen
Area Community Plan.
b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no
negative physical characteristics of the site
c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattem compatible with, and
complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattem, land uses and
characteristics.
This PUD Amendment meets all of the conditions mentioned above.
Through many conversations with both the City of Aspen Housing Board and City of Aspen
Community Development, we strongly believe that by adopting a PUD Amendment to allow for the
development of the unfinished basements at Snyder Park takes us further to the goal of flexible,
diverse and balanced affordable housing.
We welcome any conversation or questions regarding this application.
~
Sarah Broughton, AlA
Cc: Snyder Park Homeowners
2 of 2.
~ ~Z~
1~
=
Suo,,",
"',
~~~~~:;~:~~~~'~
""+"~::lZ::l: ~'l~
0\ jil',
~1
t"".,
-"'---...
z
W
r"">,
I--<
VJ
~
""'''a
,
~""
;o~
'"
_01 ,;;
":.w,-.\\
,
-,.
.
~
,
" ~"'-a
~ >s
t,
,
.~ >'C, H
jp'(
, ;;
" J! " ~ ~
-k
!? ~
,
, .", '"
, , G
, ~
...--<<,.,. . f
>1"
_.
;'7
s
"0 '''Pr~(
o i
/;..~
"'#'" "'..
*# . j'"
. # <
/...;/ ,-,;;';':"",
~."."",,,,,,
.
~-~~ "'"
""
""
"""
.
iil;
<.
~
.
-,
Ex- I ) f' \'C Ii
tll ~') )
-
-
/
MEMORANDUM
TO:
James Lindt
FROM:
Cindy Christensen
DATE:
May 26, 2005
RE:
SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT
ISSUE: The applicant is requesting approval to convert basement space in the one-bedroom units
to additional bedrooms and an additional bathroom.
BACKGROUND: Snyder Park employee housing was approved in 1998 and was sold in March of
2000. The project consists of a total of 15 units - 6 three-bedroom units and 9 one-bedroom units.
The one-bedroom units were originally going to be built for slab-on-grade construction; however,
unfinished basements were added closer to construction. The project was approved with basements
but that no additional bedrooms or bathrooms could be added. The major concern revolved around
potential parking issues.
It has been the policy of the Housing Board that units be built with the ability for an owner to
expand their unit. Providing unfinished basements is a good opportunity for an owner to do so.
RECOMMENDATION: The Housing Board and Staff highly recommend the approval of this
request.
Cindy Christensen, 07:49 AMSl27/2005 , Re: Snyder Park Referral
Page I of I
X-Sender: cindyc@commons
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Fri, 27 May 200507:49:47 -0600
To: James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
From: Cindy Christensen <cindyc@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: Snyder Park Referral
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
No. I do not want to change the bedroom count. This is normal for the housing office when someone
encloses a loft and creates another bedroom, we do not do a new deed restriction or market the unit any
different than how it went into the inventory. Therefore, a new deed restriction would not be needed.
At 12:49 PM 5/26/2005 ,you wrote:
Cindy,
It makes sense, but the one thing I wanted to ask you is whether you recommend that the units still be
sold as one-bedroom units or whether the owners would get the benefit of being able sale their unit as a
two-bedroom unit. Also, I was thinking that we should require them to record a new deed restriction
on each of the units reflecting the new number of bedrooms prior to receiving a CO for each ofthe
individual units. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks,
James
At II :32 AM 5/26/2005 , you wrote:
See if the attached makes sense.
The Housing Board is so for this and I hope I expressed that enough.
Cindy Christensen
Operations Manager, Housing Office
x5455
Cindy Christensen
Operations Manager, Housing Office
x5455
Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
5/31/2005
Jerry Nye, 10:45 AM 6/29/20('1; ,Re: Midland Avenue
Page 1 of 1
X-Sender: jerryn@commons
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 200510:45:50 -0600
To: James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
From: Jerry Nye <jerryn@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: Midland Avenue
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the lSP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
yes we do. i don't know if it is owners and guests of Snyder park, but their is always a lot of parked cars
on the street just like every other street in town.
At 10:37 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote:
Hi Jerry,
We have an application in for the homeowners in the Snyder Affordable Housing Project off of
Midland Ave. to finish the space in their unfinished basements. Two neighbors of the project have
argued to Staff that during the winter months, many of the owners and guests of Snyder park their cars
on Midland Ave. making it impossible for you guys to plow Midland Ave. in this area. Do you have
problems with Midland Ave. during the winter as they describe? Please let me know.
Thanks,
James
Jerry L. Nye
Streets Dept.
x 5133
Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
6/29/2005
,
~
--.
~
~
Gill ,1:) 1'1-- '''{J (/
ORDINANCE NO. 24
(SERIES OF ] 998)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING REZONING FROM
PITKIN COUNTY ZONE DISTRICT "MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" (R-1S)
TO CITY OF ASPEN ZONE DISTRICT "AFFORDABLE HOUSING-PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT" (ARt-PUD); CONCEPTUAL AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, AN EXEl'vIPTION FROM
THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPETITION Al\'D SCORING PROCEDURES,
APPROVAL OF THE METHOD IN WInCH AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS TO BE
PROVIDED, AND W AlVER OF THE LAND USE APPLICATION, ZONING, AND PARK
DEVELOPMENT IMP ACT FEES FOR THE "SNYDER PARK" AFFORDABLE
HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PROJECT, 210 MIDLAND AVENUE, CITY
. OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, represented by David Tolen,
Director, (Applicant) submitted an application (development proposal) to the Planning Office to
develop fifteen (15) affordable dwelling units on a 3.3 acre parcel at 2]0 Midland Avenue, known
as the "Snyder Parcd;" and,
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a rezoning of the parcel from Pitkin County
Moderate Density Residential Zone District (R-15) to Affordable Housing-Planned Unit
Development (AHl-PUD) in conjunction \\~th an application for Annexation, Conceptual and Final
Planned Unit Development approval, Subdivision approval, Special Review approval to establish
the parking requirements, waivers from the "Residential Design Standards", an exemption from the
competition and scoring procedures of the Growth Management Quota System, approval of the
method in which the affordable housing is to be pro\~ded, and waiver of land use, zoning, and park
development impact fees; and
\VHEREAS, the Planning Department reviewed the development proposal in accordance
with all applicable procedure and review criteria set forth in Sections 26,28, 26.32, 26.44, 26.52,
26.56, 26.58, 26.64, 26.84, 26.88, 26.92, and 26.1 00 of the Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Commission conducted a public hearing on June 30,
] 998, in accordance with Section 26.52 of the Municipal Code, reviewed and considered the
development proposal in accordance with those procedures set forth in Sections 26.52 and 26.100
Ordinance No. 24, Series 1998
Page I
e-,
~,
.-...
-"",
of the Municipal Code, and recommended approval for an exemption from the Growth
Management Quota System and approval of the method in which affordable housing is being
provided; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 30,
1998, in accordance with Section 26.52 ofthe Municipal Code, reviewed the development proposal
in accordance with all applicable procedures and review criteria set forth in Sections 26.28, 26.32,
26.52,26.58,26.64,26.84,26.88, and 26.92 of the Municipal Code, denied, the Special Review to
establish the parking requirements, denied the request to waive provisions of the "Residential
Design Standards," and reconunended Council deny the Amendment to the Official Zone District
Map, Conceptual and Final Plarmed Unit Development, and Subdivision; and,
WlIEREAS, the Aspen City COW1cil has reviewed and considered the development
proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified in Sections 26.28,
26.32, 26.44, 26.52, 26.58, 26.64, 26.84, 26.88, 26.92, and 26.1 00 of the Municipal Code, has
reviewed and considered those recommendations and denials by the Growth Management
Conunission, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Housing Authority, and has taken and
considered public comment at a public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the Council found that a full four step PUD review process would be
redundant and serve no public purpose and a two step consolidated PUD review process would be
more appropriate; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all
applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with
conditions, is consistent v.~th the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City COW1cil finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for public
health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BYTHE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ASPEN, COLORADO as follows:
Ordinance No. 24, Series J 998
Page 2
--~_..,"' ,...>",._.----~--
~.
er-
I
~.
..."",-
, ,
Section 1:
That it does hereby grant an amendment to the Official Zone District Map for the subject parcel, as
described on the final plat, from Pitkin County Zone District "Moderate Density Residential" (R-
15) to "Affordable Housing -Planned Unit Development" (AHl-PUD).
Section 2:
The Official Zone District Map for this City of Aspen, Colorado, shall be and is hereby amended to
retlect the amendment as set forth in Section 1 above.
Section 3:
Pursuant to Section 26.84.030 of the Municipal Code, City Council finds that a four step review
pTOceSS would be redundant and serve no public purpose and approves a consolidated two step
PUD review process.
Section 4:
Pursuant to Sections 26.28, 26.44, 26.52, 26.84, 26.88, 26.92, and 26.1 00, and subject to those
conditions of approval as specified hereinafter, the City Council hereby grants approval for an
amendment to the Official Zone District Map, Planned Unit Development approval, Subdivision
approval, exemption from the Growth Management Quota System scoring and competition
procedure for affordable housing, approval of the method of providing affordable housing, and
waiver of the land use and park development impact fees for "Snyder Park", with the following
conditions:
1. Recommendations made by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Growth Management
Commission are subject to annexation of the property into the City of Aspen. Failure to complete
annexation shall render these recommendations void.
2. The Final PUD I Subdivision plat shall include all necessary plat requirements of the City Engineer
including site plans, grading plans, architectural plans and elevatiolls, and a landscape plan. In
addition, the plat shall show each parcel created, a permanent access easement across the park parcel
to the housing parcel along the access drive, a permanent access easement across the park parcel for
the ADA accessible trail from the proposed parking area to the housing courtyard, a permanent
Ordinance No. 24, Series 1998
Page 3
~.
e/,",,\
e-
.-'
. ,
easement for the proposed bus shelter. Adequate snow storage areas shall be delineated on the final
plat. All utility easements shall be shown, an easement shall be granted to the City Parks
Department for maintenance of the proposed Ditch along the east and north property boundaries.
The plat shall delineate the required monuments for each comer of each parcel and range point( s),
and shall show an approved street name for the proposed access drive.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the final plat shall be approved and recorded and the applicant
shall record a Subdivision/POO agreement binding the property to this development order. The
agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to recordation.
4. The SubdivisionlPUD agreement shall describe maintenance of the housing parcel's common areas,
maintenance of the access way on both parcels, and a 2 year guarantee on landscape improvements
for the housing parcel, including trees, st81ting on the issuance day of the last Certificate of
Occupancy for a housing unit.
5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, all utility construction plans shall be approved by the City
Engineer of the appropriate utility agency. The applicant is responsible for necessary utility
upgrades related to the development, including City Water and sanitary sewer service. The applicant
shall coordinate utility upgrades, when appropriate, with surrounding development. Landscape
improvements within utility easements shall be approved by the respective utility agency.
6. Prior to issuance ofa building permit, the Fire Marshall shaH approve the development plans. The
structures shall be sprinkled.
7. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the City Engineer shall approve the applicant's Drainage Plan
which shall be prepared based on a 2 year event cycle, and include lining the ponds to prevent
seepage to Midland Avenue, and accepting historical drainage from Midland Avenue. The plan shall
ensure no sediment loaded drainage will be leaving the property during and after construction and
that mud will not be Iracked onto City Streets during construction.
8. Construction vehicles, including personal vehicles, and material may only be stored on the subject
property and may not encroach on City Streets.
9. Prior to jssuance of a building penn it, the Environmental Health Department shall approve the
applicant's Dust Control plan and Air Quality Mitigation Plan. All Air quality mitigation measure
shall be installed prior 10 issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
10. Prior 10 issuance ofa building permit, the applicant shall pay the applicable school land dedication
fees for each unit. The fee is $327 for each one-bedroom unit and $4,447 for each three bedroom
unit. $29,625 tOlaL
i 1. The applicant shall coordinate construction activilies for improvement to Midland Avenue with the
City Engineer. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall install a
pedestrian path along the property to the intersection of Highway 82, and shall repair with a full
width patch the disrupted portions of Midland Avenue. In order to minimize the disruption to
Midland Avenue, The City Engineer shaU coordinate speed hump improvements along Midland with
the applicant's development schedule.
12. The applicant shall install a stop sign at the access way exit and the necessary street lights required
by the City Engineer. Placement and standards for these improvements shall be approved by the
City Engineer.
Ordinance No. 24, Series] 998
Page 4
.r-,
.~
~.
-",
13. The applicant shall post the 4 "park" parking spaces as two hour parking. The condomininm
documents or homeowners association documents shall state the nature of this parking as available
for temporary or guest parking but not for the purpose of long-term parking.
14. The applicant shall specify cotton-less varieties of Cottonwood trees for construction drawings.
15. All site lighting sball be downcast and lighting sball not be used to accentuate landscape or
architectural elements. The Parks Department is encouraged to provide lighting bollards along the
proposed trail parallel to Midland Avenue at either side of the access way, at the northern
intersection of the trail witb midland Avenue, one at the "TOO intersection near the soutb-western
property boundary, and one near the proposed steps to the upper bench grass area.
16. The dimensional requirements for tbe parcel are as follows;
As represented on Final Plat
As represented proposed
elevations and recorded with Final Plat
As represented on Final Plat
As represented on Final Plat
As represented on Final Plat
No requirement.
As represented on Final Plat
Minimum 10' wide, unobstructed.
Allowable Floor Area = 21,500 square
feet.
Minimum percent open space. As represented on Final Plat
17. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall complete andrecord an agreement to join
any future improvement districts for the purpose of constructing public right-of-way improvements.
This requirement may be waived of the improvements are proposed as part of the development.
18. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit GIS data including property lines,
building footprints, easements, and encroachments.
19. All utility meters and any llew utility pedestals or transfonners must be installed on the applicant's
property and not ill allY public right-of-way. Easements must be provided for pedestals. All utility
locations and easements must be delineated on the Fjnal Plat. Meter locations must be accessible for
reading and may not be obstructed.
Minimum distance between buildings
Maximum height (including viewplanes)
Minimum front yard
Minimum rear yard
Minjmum side yard
Minimum lot width
Minimum lot area
Trash access area
Internal floor area ratio
20. The applicant must receive approval for any work within public rights-of-way from the appropriate
City Department. This includes, but is not limited to, approval for mailboxes and landscaping from
the City Streets Department.
21. The applicant should be aware of the City's noise ordinance prohjbiting construction between 10 p.m.
and 7 a.m. The applicant shall observe concerns of neighbors by ceasing outdoor mechanical activity
past 7 p.m. each night.
22. The applicant shall record the Planning and Zoning Resolution and the Gro\Nth Management
Commission Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza
Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee TO the
City Clerk who will record the resolution.
Ordinance No. 24, Series] 998
Page 5
--
er"
,
e-
-~,
23. The pedestrian path proposed to provide handicapped access to the upper courtyard from the south end
of the parking area shall be designed to acc<>tnmodate limited automobile access from the parking area
to the intersection of the courtyard loop path.
24. The applicant shall not be responsible for any Land Use Application fees, Water Tap, or Park
Development Impact fees associated with this development.
25. Residential Design Standards for Building Orientation and Garage Placement for the housing
portion of this development are hereby waived. Any substantial changes to the housing development
as proposed which affect the elements being granted a waiver, or which require anadditionltl waiver,
shall only be approved by the Design Review Appeal Committee (DRAC).
26. The parking requirements are established at 21 and 4 spaces respectively f<>r the housing and park
parcel of this development. The 4 parking spaces for the park development shall be signed for two
hour (maximwn) parking and the homeowner's documents for the housing development shall state
that the 4 spaces may be used for temporary or guest parking, but not for long tenn parking,
27. The City Council hereby grants an exemption from the scoring and competition procedures of the
growth management quota system for fifteen (15) affordable housing units and deducts these units
from the annual pool of development allotments,
28. The project shall consist of fifteen (15) affordable housing units deed restricted to Category sale
prices and restrictions and shall be available through the Housing Authority Lottery System, The
one. bedroom units shall be Category 3, or lower, the three-bedroom units shall be Category 4, or
lower, This is the "method" approved by City CounciL
Section 5:
All material represen1ations and commitments made by ilie developer put'suant to the developmen1
proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before
the Gro",-th Management Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, and or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied \~ith as if
fully set forth herein, unless amended by oilier speci1ic conditions.
Section 6;
This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending wlder or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Ordinance No. 24, Series] 998
Page 6
~,
.~,
~
"^'
Section 7:
lf any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
Section 8:
That the City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this
ordinance in the office ofthe Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder.
Section 9:
A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the 27th day of July, 1998 at 5:00 in the City
Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a
public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation ",ithin the City of
Aspen,
Ordinance No. 24, Series 1998
J>age7
e-'
--.
~.
.~
/'.
~
. INTRODUCED, READ At'lD ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law,
by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 13th day of July, 1998.
Approved as to form:
Approved as to content:
" 2?/P/~
City Attorney
~{J~
fI
John Bennett, Mayor
Attest: .
.'
FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this ~ day 0
Approved as to form:
s to content:
(,/~~/fo/~
City Attorney
~ 17~~1
John Bennett, Mayor
Attest:
vfk
Ordinance No. 14, Series 1998
Page 8
Prestridge@aoLcom. 08: 10 PM 6/lS/200S , Snyder Park Pud Amendme~t
Page 1 of 1
0xh)'loJ- It 1/
From: Prestridge@aoLcom
Date: Wed, IS Jun200S 22:10:48 EDT
Subject: Snyder Park Pud Amendment
To: jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub SOlI
X-Processed-By: Rebuild vl.SO-l
X-Spam: [F=0.0001264228; B=O.SOO(O); BMI=O.SOO(none); S=0.010(200S0Sl80l); MH=O.SSO
(200S06lSl3); R=0.010(s4SS/n444S6); SC=none]
X-MAIL-FROM: <prestridge@aoLcom>
X-SOURCE-IP: [64.12.137.1]
X-MailScanner-lnformation: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Dear Mr. Lindt:
We received Public Notice regarding the SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT.
We are property owners across the street from Snyder Park at 215 Midland Avenue.
We object to the amendment to increase their finished space due to the fact that by allowing this project to
increase the size of their homes, it will certainly create additional parking problems for not only the residents
who live at Snyder Park, but the neighbors as well. The parking directly across from our Aspen home is always
being used by either the residents who live in Snyder Park or people who commute, using this parking area for
their meeting place. The autos, as well as trucks with trailers monopolize the parking spaces, sometimes
for several days without moving them. There is no regard for the posted parking restrictions or the enforcement
thereof. The snowplows cannot clean that portion of Midland Avenue and it becomes a hazard in the winter
time.
Kindly note our objection at the meeting since we will not be able to attend. This email can be entered into the
record and we would appreciate you doing so.
We would appreciate being advised on this matter. If you need anything further, please let us know.
Yours very truly,
Felix and Carolyne DeJean
215 Midland Avenue
Aspen, CO 81611
337 -942-6428
Email: PrestriQge@aol.gQm
Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@)ci.aspen.co.us>
6/16/200S
Joseph Grosz, 01:0S PM 6/1""" ""OS , 210 Midland Ave, Aspen, Co
Page 1 of2
From: "Joseph Grosz" <jg@premierinvest.net>
To: "james lindt" <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: 210 Midland Ave, Aspen, Co
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 200S 14:0S:13 -OSOO
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam: [F=O.OIOOOOOOOO; heur=O.SOO(lSOO); stat=0.010; spamtraq-heur=0.SOO(200S06l409)]
X-MAlL-FROM: <jg@premierinvest.net> .
X-SOURCE-lP: [64.143.143.167]
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-DistLoop-Detect: I
X-Processed-By: Rebuild vLSO-l
X-Spam: [F=0.0060679l20; B=O.SOO(O); BMl=O.SOO(none); S=0.010(200S0S1801); MH=O.SOO
(200S061409); R=0.376(s30611/nS0648); SC=none]
X - MAIL-FROM: <jg@premierinvest.net>
X-SOURCE-lP: [2l6.l73.237.16S]
X-MailScanner-lnformation: Please contact the ISP for more information
X'MailScanner: Found to be clean
Dear Mr. Lindt,
We received the Public Notice regarding the SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT.
We own the property at 211 Midland Ave, directly across from Snyder Park.
Please inform us of the procedure to object to this Amendment since we will not be able to attend the public
hearing.
We strongly object to the increase in finished space. This will allow additional occupancy without
additional parking. The Snyder development currently has more cars per occupant than can be parked inside the
complex and that does not address visitors. The current parking situation at Snyder development is causing
problems for us at 211 Midland. Cars belonging to the occupants and visitors are parked in violation of the
parking restrictions for the street of 2 hour limits for park use. They are NOT using the park and they are way
beyond the two hours. (Days beyond at times) It is almost impossible to get out of our driveway in the winter
and difficult in the summer. The posted parking signs are being ignored and the police NEVER enforce the two
hour parking limit, while using the Park. The Police only act after phone calls informing them the car has
been parked for longer than a few days.
What is the FAR for these units at Snyder? It seems to us that they probably have maxed the allowed FAR at
time of original construction.
PARKING IS A MAJOR PROBLEM, IN THE WINTER when owners/occupants/visitors from SNYDER
DEVELOPMENT park their CARS OVERNIGHT AND IT SNOWS. THE STREET CANNOT BE CLEANED BY
SNOWPLOWS CAUSING ICING AND THEREFORE MAJOR SLIDING PROBLEMS FOR ACCESS TO OUR
DRIVEWAY.
MORE BEDROOMS WILL EQUATE TO MORE CARS AND THEREFORE, WE STRONGLY OBJECT TO THE
APPROVAL OF THIS AMENDMENT.
We realize everyone would like more space in Aspen to accommodate more friends and family (or renters) but
every lucky person who was able to purchase in Snyder Park knew the limitations of their great investment If it is
too small for them they need to sell to someone with less space needs.
Thank you for the assistance.
Colleen and Joseph Grosz
211 Midland Ave
Aspen
Printed for James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
6/14/200S
~""'''~''._'~_'''T"'<'''''''''''''-<''
~.",,,
Mk~ ~M,t5 U",A,-r
~'. 3,^,~ ?h'f"" ~~O
....'
.,,-
. J.I,\ ~f'\ I -;z 0,"'5
,
:j-aWILS.
1"\-\\S k#\f' is -\J '\V\~.,..IL ()\J\f' {OY\u.....5 'ill:1ou-r a\\Ow~,
;-t~ $KiI-U\I" \ eo... UVI '1"S. 10, en"""'\" b&'>2\N\.t"+- ">fMe$
a.....J. aM be.lIl'O""" S I -rk. d v'1oW1.'\ t'oJV "",1.! ~~vd"vr /1
toov-k-uA out It..A at"~vou-e.i. b-S tk t",v.~t v\i\ ~ ,,~
\ &\'2-..-r vlA.ult; &~ <il-tih, lhe . rl'))p4~ c..t1al\.t- ~ do t'I<lt nol1W'
t~ 6"'aiMI f'(1'n.~t-tlli"~ b++h.. ~"I~f\M""\V\d('
" -/l"j +>1 ",Ii'-" "'" .,....1 ",f\><t""" r P""'J."'"
e)C7sr. iht. ,VICreM I~ ~i-IJ fS 1J",~rr? (Jl t'l/!'7 At~
-flMt- w,/L(,M .:uith t/11. ov'",w.j pll\.IWIt"~ fr, r.v~\t. !l(
~tttf\.a\ f'...~et-t, \A~\D-~ AiJe.(.pv'y-<.../-t\y IS G~u.)(J..eJ,
\')i f"'~~\1 f.-e.~rJ(t) fro""l:'. 1h '=> "'1"v ~4 I r,AI)V~
..&e&.vtJ<?'lIIS (,</lLI ,:;:Gtllc. ~ rVll~ltlM'>' . .
~ v'ey.~ ,t f4~/ld"iliI11 \w1~Vll~ Vvll"+~ w~~( lI(<:o {lIXtt'f
Mt\t4'i( 11-e. . pflLt ptv (Jrt1r ffi..... 4-tuvC. p\J"~~')
wlJlt(,'^- \~ ""k ~ (o'1Sis~t-~rrroll&\ -\of.'>>IJ~~
"alW..JA~/Q ~~IW;".. 1J\,\~~~lolrl b<M~" 'od\(1l0~S .
\'1Mt.IM.$ ac-ttt,"1 '\\j"'t I ~e.A.l.l.t<.", ~ e~vtSS wn,tk\ twLs
+r> \ teJit-l-w<lls a~ corl,I.G.IfA!r,k. e'/"~"lS(.. ~t,riS ovJJ.J.. .
.-\-tl -tJN. ft-M \.t.'I fv.- €~"" \J;\lt"'. ~lllP'\\~n1 ~Mc~
\lll,;twct;S a,'(. ~"owJl.()l~~,^ DoJl\#'1, ~t_~tI(,~S'i'lJloi.u..t
()U)VltI/' .Qc.eJ.f'k. ~.'l'S$~ 4- -kt<,. ~~~,(..JWl'\"
\}Jt.. 'vu~ -\v 1It\e.j.~ '/lJ.1.f...Wu.) .but .l.lJtlt~ ~
-N!'~ Ow" oldf"$kN'" -1;0 1\1" 0100-' D 1..0 .
. I f r~ e..'lAlAf ,v.. P\J,iO
S;VUL~ ' . .
. A\ . f/~v- -r p.\)~~( ~~
~ A~~ P...~.
,
. AI Beyer Design Inc. . 410 North M'II 5
_ I treet.B-l1'As C !
1 'd pen" olorado 81611 ' 970'925-8339
"" 0"''" ".00'" 'GO ';~"G:O:;':
W' "'
05 11:48a Al"e~er
Aw,v,. j~,,^H \',,,,,(t
9'
'258392
p.l
July 4, 2005
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Aspen
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Subject: Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD Amendment
I am writing to express my concern about the proposed conversion of the basement
areas of the one bedroom units in Snyder Park Affordable Housing, making those units
into two bedroom units.
A significant number of the residents of the surrounding neighborhoods participated in
an approximately three year review process with the Housing Authority, City of Aspen
advisory boards, and the City Council prior to the approval and implementation of the
current PUD. Before establishing the current density of the development, there was
significant analysis and study of many potential scenarios, of their impact on the
development itself, and on the surrounding neighborhoods.
That plan provided for a reasonable balance of new housing density as measured
against other neighborhood impacts. To put that process into perspective, it is
interesting to note that Snyder Park was one of the few projects that ever received solid
neighborhood support when submitted to City Council for approval.
During the years since approval, we have seen that some of the development goals
were met, but we underestimated the need for off-street parking. This can be readily
observed by the number of vehicles associated with Snyder Park which are regularly
parked along Midland Avenue.
I also believe that this application proposes a precedent inconsistent with the reputation
and credibility of the Housing Authority. Neighbors and residents of affordable housing
should have the assurance that the approved density will not be subject to significant
modification once the projects are developed and purchased by residents. By my
calculations this would constitute a 33% increase in the number of bedrooms at Snyder
Park. I expect there are residents in other than one-bedroom units who may not feel
free to voice their objection because of the potential for neighborhood conflict. The
notice for this application does not indicate how many additional parking spaces are
proposed to accommodate the increased number of residents. This increase in
residents may not occur immediately, but certainly will in the future.
In summary, I believe that the proposed PUD amendment should be denied, as it will
produce a development density in excess of that planned for this location, and will set a
precedent that is highly undesirable. Likely, the next amendment would be to convert
garages to bedrooms or other living space, thus creating additional impacts.
Thank you for your consideration,
Evan H Gull
25 Ardmore Court
Aspen, CO 81611
Joseph Grosz, 01:0S PM 6/11....."" OS, 210 Midland Ave, Aspen, Co
Page 1 of2
From: "Joseph Grosz" <jg@premierinvesLnet>
To: "james lindt" <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: 210 Midland Ave, Aspen, Co
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 200S l4:0S:13 -OSOO
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam: [F=0.0100000000; heur=O.SOO(lSOO); stat=0.010; spamtraq-heur=0.SOO(200S061409)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <jg@premierinvesLnet>
X-SOURCE-IP: [64.143.143.167]
X-Loop-Detect: I
X-DistLoop-Detect: I
X-Processed-By: Rebuild v1.50-1
X-Spam: [F=0.0060679120; B=O.SOO(O); BMI=O.SOO(none); S=0.010(200S0Sl80l); MH=O.SOO
(200S06l409); R=0.376(s306lllnS0648); SC=none]
X - MAIL-FROM: <j g@premierinvest.net>
X-SOURCE-IP: [2l6.173.237.16S]
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Dear Mr. Lindt,
We received the Public Notice regarding the SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT.
We own the property at 211 Midland Ave, directly across from Snyder Park.
Please inform us of the procedure to object to this Amendment since we will not be able to attend the public
hearing.
We strongly object to the increase in finished space. This will allow additional occupancy without
additional parking. The Snyder development currently has more cars per occupant than can be parked inside the
complex and that does not address visitors. The current parking situation at Snyder development is causing
problems for us at 211 Midland. Cars belonging to the occupants and visitors are parked in violation of the
parking restrictions for the street of 2 hour limits for park use. They are NOT using the park and they are way
beyond the two hours. (Days beyond at times) It is almost impossible to get out of our driveway in the winter
and difficult in the summer. The posted parking signs are being ignored and the police NEVER enforce the two
hour parking limit, while using the Park. The Police only act after phone calls informing them the car has
been parked for longer than a few days.
What is the FAR for these units at Snyder? It seems to us that they probably have maxed the allowed FAR at
time of original construction.
PARKING IS A MAJOR PROBLEM, IN THE WINTER when ownersloccupants/visitors from SNYDER
DEVELOPMENT park their CARS OVERNIGHT AND IT SNOWS. THE STREET CANNOT BE CLEANED BY
SNOWPLOWS CAUSING ICING AND THEREFORE MAJOR SLIDING PROBLEMS FOR ACCESS TO OUR
DRIVEWAY
MORE BEDROOMS WILL EQUATE TO MORE CARS AND THEREFORE, WE STRONGLY OBJECT TO THE
APPROVAL OF THIS AMENDMENT
We realize everyone would like more space in Aspen to accommodate more friends and family (or renters) but
every lucky person who was able to purchase in Snyder Park knew the limitations of their great investment. If it is
too small for them they need to sell to someone with less space needs.
Thank you for the assistance.
Colleen and Joseph Grosz
211 Midland Ave
Aspen
Pr;ntp~ fnr hm"s T .inch <iameslia)Ci.asoen.co.us>
6/14/200S
I...
H' Architects
Heidi H. Hoffmann, AlA
504 Midland park PI.
Aspen, CO 81611
970/925.9420
Fax 970/925.4671
hhI1arch@rof.net
July 19,2005
City of Aspen P&Z
C/O James Lindt
130 S. Galena
. Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Snyder Park PUD
To Whom It May Concern:
I would like to extend my support to the homeowners at Snyder Park to amend the existing PUD to
allow the basements of the one-bedroom units to be remodeled to include a bedroom and bath. As
one of the architects on the project and a neighbor, I feel this modification should not impact the
intent of our affordable housing program nor the neighborhood.
The Housing Authority approved the addition of basements to these one-bedroom units to locate the
mechanical and plumbing equipment and for desperately needed storage space. Due to code
requirements, these basements already have an adequate egress window meeting light and
ventilation requirements for a potential bedroom. It is my recollection that only three out of the
nine one-bedroom units have access off the living rooms into the bathroom. All the other units
require any guest to go through the bedroom to use the bathroom.
In speaking to Antoinette Lafontaine (a one-bedroom homeowner), she has assured me that this
modification is strictly for the convenience to guests and would not require additional parking. All
of the current homeowners are original, and their requirements have evolved either from marriage,
visiting grandchildren, etc. My belief if someone were to try and rent out their basement, the
homeowner's association board would get wind of this immediately and put out notice to the
offending homeowner.
Thank you for the opportunity to support the passage of this PUD amendment.
Very truly yours,
ct/?1CiA' ~~
Heidi H. Hoffmann AlA
Heidi H. Hoffmann AIA
H3 Architects
504 Midland Pk. PI.
Aspen, CO 81611
970 925 9420
hhharch@rof.net
August 2, 2005
City of Aspen P&Z
C/O James Lindt
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Snyder Park PUD Amendment
To Whom It May Concern:
I would like to extend my support to the homeowners at Snyder Park to amend the existing PUD to
allow the finishing off of their basements to include uses other than bedroom use. As a neighbor
and associate architect on the project, this amendment should not impact the intent of the affordable
housing program to provide for one-bedroom housing nor automobile parking on Midland Avenue.
That being said, I would encourage the Snyder Park homeowners to strictly monitor their own
parking situation and be responsive to their neighbor's parking and driving concerns. The issue of
current parking spots not being used for their intended use needs to be addressed by the
homeowners themselves.
Thank you for the opportunity to support the passage of this PUD amendment.
Very truly yours,
Heidi H. Hoffmann AlA
~...~"",,,_,~,..,......___,~'.k- ..",_.,~--,.""..---"."--,,,...~...,-~,.---
t 'l [l ,\
EK1\01f FfI
RESOLUTION NO. 22
(SERIES OF 2005)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION, RECOMMENDING THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A PUD
AMENDMENT TO THE SNYDER PARK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
TO ALLOW FOR UNFINISHED BASEMENTS TO BE CONVERTED TO
LIVABLE SPACE AND FINISHED, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, represented by Rowland and Broughton
Architecture and Urban Design, requesting approval of a PUD amendment to allow for
the eight (8) I-bedroom units (ADA accessible I-bedroom unit not included) that were
constructed with unfinished basements to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, City Council approved the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD
pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998, allowing for the construction of six 3-
bedroom and eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units in Snyder Park
Subdivision/PUD; and,
WHEREAS, the eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units were constructed
with unfinished basements that were not allowed to be finished with bedrooms under the
original development approvals; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development Department and the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Board
recommended approval of the requested amendment to provide the ability for unit owners to
finish the basements in the eight (8) I-bedroom units with additional bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on July 5, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission continued review of the application until July 19,2005; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on July 19, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission continued review of the application until August 2, 2005; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on August 2, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 22, Series of 2005, by a four to zero (4-0)
vote, recommending that City Council approve with conditions, a PUD amendment to the
Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD allowing for the eight (8) I-bedroom units that were
constructed with unfinished basements to finish their basements; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code
as identified herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development
proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the
development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the
Aspen Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1:
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends that City Council approve a
PUD amendment to the Snyder Park PUD allowing for the unfinished basements in the
eight (8) I-bedroom units (not including the ADA accessible I-bedroom unit because it does
not have an unfinished basement) to be finished, with the following conditions:
I. A building permit shall be applied for and approved to finish each of the
individual basements. The finished basements shall meet the applicable
building code requirements that are in place at the time of building permit
submittaL
2. The basements shall not contain cooking devices, thereby reinforcing that
the finished basements are not to be used as an additional, stand-alone
dwelling unit.
3. The owners of the subject units that finish their basements shall not be
allowed to be reimbursed for more than 10% of the actual costs of capital
improvements to the units upon the initial sale of the improved units
pursuant to the affordable housing guidelines.
4. The basements in the eight I-bedroom units shall not be allowed to
include bedrooms. Bedrooms are defined as a portion of a dwelling unit
intended to be used for sleeping purposes, which contain closets, have
access to a bathroom and which meet the International Building Code
requirements for light and ventilation. This language shall not preclude
the owners from having the ability to install a powderoom (to only contain
at most I toilet and I sink) in the basement as long as the other rooms are
not intended to be used for sleeping purposes.
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 3:
This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
-""._..._---^','"....._~_...,~
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 2nd
day of August, 2005.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
City Attorney
Jasmine Tygre, Chair
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
BhJlo/1 \~I'
ASPEN PLANNIN'tJ & ZONING COMMISSION - Minutes - Julv 19,2005
Jasmine Tygre opened the regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting in
Council Chambers at 4:30 p.m. Commission Members Brian Speck, Brandon
Marion, Dylan Johns, Steve Skadron and Jasmine Tygre were present. Ruth
Kruger and John Rowland were excused. Staff in attendance were Jennifer Phelan,
Chris Bendon and James Lindt, Community Development and Jackie Lothian,
Deputy City Clerk.
COMMENTS
Steve Skadron complimented the city on the signage on the pathways in town.
Jasmine Tygre asked if the Zupancis property was purchased with housing funds.
Joyce Allgaier would look into it. Tygre stated that was an excellent location for
infill housing.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
John Rowland rescued himself on the Snyder Affordable Housing PUD
Amendment and the Hyman Avenue Condominiums, Subdivision and GMQS.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING (07/05/05):
SNYDER AFFORDABLE HOUSING PUD AMENDMENT
Jasmine Tygre opened the public hearing for the Snyder Affordable Housing PUD
Amendment. Notice was provided at the July 5th public hearing. James Lindt
stated this was a public hearing to finish out 8 of the I-bedroom unit basements.
P&Z is the recommending body to City Council.
Lindt said the background on the project was constructing 15 Affordable Housing
Units on the East side of Midland Avenue; 6 3-bedroom units and 9 I-bedroom
units. The I-bedroom units were originally approved with slab-on-grade
construction however when they got into building permit review the building
department required crawl spaces under the units. When the contractor began
digging the crawl spaces the soil problems were found and full basements were
dug to eliminate the soil problems; the basements have been unfinished to this
point. Lindt said the Homeowners Association is requesting the ability to finish
these basements with a variety of room uses. Staff felt it important to have the
expandability options for some of these affordable housing units; it allows unit
owners to maintain their units through different life stages. Lindt noted there were
a number of letters from neighbors with concerns about the parking and traffic on
Midland Avenue. Staff proposed a condition that these basements would be
limited to I additional bedroom per unit partially because there is only one egress
well and it limits the impacts of parking. Staff recommended approval.
2
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - Minutes - Julv 19,2005
Sarah Broughton stated she represented Snyder Park and Dan Glick said he was
one ofthe I-bedroom owners. Broughton said last fall they looked at developing
several of the basements for several of the homeowners and it became evident that
this was not part ofthe PUD. Broughton said this went back to the Aspen Area
Community Plan to add more housing stock and the Housing Board was 100%
behind finishing the basements. Broughton stated that 8 of the 9 I-bedroom units
have the ability to expand; the 9th unit was slab-on-grade with a garage. Broughton
said they agree with the conditions and no cooking facilities would be placed in the
basements so the basements could not be rented as an additional unit and the units
would remain as I-bedroom units in the housing inventory.
Dan Glick provided the history of Snyder beginning with the lottery process and
the units were ready to be moved into in February 2000; he said there were 850
applicants for the 15 units. Glick said 5Yz years later no one has moved out or is
planning on moving out; he said it was a great community and an awesome place
to live. Glick stated that he videoed the parking situation. Glick explained on the
map where the 8 I-bedroom unit owners park and the 3-bedroom unit owners have
2-car garages. Glick saw 4 Snyder Park residents cars on Midland.
Steve Skadron asked if it was Dan's contention that Midland Avenue was not over
parked. Glick said no but the construction traffic and people park over 2 hours in
the 2 hour zone plus it was not well policed. Skadron asked who determined the
amount of parking available on the streets. Lindt replied the City Engineer and the
Streets Department determine the adequacy and safety. Skadron asked ifthere
were concerns. Lindt responded that Jerry Nye from Streets said there was a little
trouble plowing there in the winter because of parked cars.
Skadron asked why in the original Ordinance #24, 1998 wasn't expandability
included. Tygre responded that it was never even brought up at P&Z. Skadron
asked how the improvement affects the value of the property over time. Lindt
replied there was a cap either way because they were affordable housing units and
even with the improvements the units would be considered I-bedrooms. Lindt
stated there was a condition in the resolution allowing a 10% cap for the
improvements.
Skadron asked what slab-on-grade means. Broughton answered it was a way to
build a foundation with a gravel base with 4-5 inch concrete pad without a crawl
space or basement underneath.
Brandon Marion asked the parking requirement if the project were built today with
8 2-bedroom units instead of I-bedroom units. Lindt replied that it would increase
by I space per unit.
3
ASPEN PLANNIN'\j & ZONING COMMISSION - Minutes - Julv 19,2005
Dylan Johns asked if any other studies have been done to add parking to this site.
Lindt said the applicants have looked at that and staff also did separately. Staff
would not like to see a loss of the courtyard area for additional parking. Broughton
said that more parking could be planned in but it was a delicate balance with the
open space area so important to this project; it would cost part of the park.
The commissioners further discussed parking within the realm of limiting the
amount of available parking or not allowing more than I car per I-bedroom unit;
the enforcement issue; limiting parking stickers; more signs; the applicant become
responsible for policing the cars from Snyder owners.
Skadron asked the profiles of the people living at Snyder. Glick replied that all of
the I-bedrooms were single people except for the one that got married; the 3-
bedrooms units were families or starting families.
Johns asked if it was possible to say that you can inhabit the space but not with a
bedroom and was that enforceable. Lindt replied that could happen and it also
could be enforced. Lindt explained the building code requirements stated a
bedroom had a closet and direct access to a bathroom. Lindt said that the building
department would be made aware if someone were living in the basements by the
other owners.
Public Comments:
I. Heidi Hoffman said that she was the co-architect on the Snyder project; she
provided a letter to the commission. Hoffman said that she was in favor of the
PUD Amendment even though Midland Avenue was an issue but agreed with Dan
that people park on Midland from someplace else. Hoffman said the mechanical
was to go into the basements.
2. Lassie Dahl worked on the project for 3 years and supported it. Dahl said
this amendment was now inconsistent with the reputation and creditability of the
housing authority. Dahl would like to see Snyder Park maintained at the same
status and questioned the homeowners policing the parking and the units. Dahl
said she understood a lot of the traffic was construction traffic. Dahl voiced
concern for the additional parking on the site and the addition of a bathroom.
3. Steve Hawk said that he lived in the adjacent subdivision, Smuggler Grove,
and was in favor of the project. Hawk said that he attended monthly meetings for
36 months on Snyder and part of the discussions were how many bedrooms there
would be; parking was part of the problem and was not enforced. Hawk said this
degrades the integrity of the housing authority to have a I-bedroom and without
4
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - Minutes - Julv 19,2005
changing the qualifications of the purchasers and they now have 2-bedroom units.
Hawk said this would increase the density and add more cars.
4. Nancy Snell stated she lived on the comer of Midland and Hopkins; she said
that it was a long 3 years working on the project with both sides winning and
losing. Snell said that was what they fought for was not to have cars parked there;
the issue of I-bedrooms was a big issue. Snell said where there is a bedroom there
is a car; she would like to stick with the formula that was agreed upon.
Dylan Johns stated that there were serious issues allowing the ability of bedroom to
be added to the basement level of the buildings from both the planning standpoint
of the overall neighborhood. Johns said however the space is there and asked if it
is possible to prohibit the ability to utilize that space as a bedroom; the conditions
make the issue strange calling it a I-bedroom or a 2-bedroom. Johns would be in
favor of allowing an amendment to the PUD to allow the basement spaces to be
used but not as a bedroom.
Brandon Marion said this was his favorite housing project and he also respected
the neighborhood issues. Marion said to change the PUD now was not a good
idea; people who bought the I-bedroom units knew what they were buying.
Marion said it seemed as ifthe whole project were under parked. Marion said he
would not approve without seeing a plan for living space but not a bedroom.
Brian Speck said that he was of the like mind; at one hand life does change and
flexibility is needed however there were agreements made originally. Speck said
the cars were the issue and maybe the parking needed to be on the site.
Steve Skadron said that initially he wanted to honor the original ordinance and
shared Brandon's concerns but the big picture is what really should be addressed.
Skadron said that he leaned towards Dylan's comments and he could support this
with conditions to prevent the basement from becoming a bedroom. Skadron said
the homeowners should have the opportunity to change the vacant space into a
home office or useful space.
Jasmine Tygre said that she was very tom by this amendment because she was part
of the original PUD process and felt that this site should have greater density ifthe
parking could be handled however what is on site is what was agreed to. Tygre
believed that the PUD should be upheld in terms of density and would be reluctant
to approve another bedroom but agreed that it was not right having space that was
not useable when those spaces could make the units so much more livable.
5
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - Minutes - Julv 19,2005
Marion wanted to have the applicant re-propose an integrated plan. Tygre summed
up that the commissioners did not want to see a bedroom but rather a living space
with only a powder room not a full bathroom. Joyce Allgaier stated that 3
commissioners did not want to have that livable space be used as a bedroom; it
must be residential space. Broughton stated that they would like to come back
after getting what was wanted by the entire association.
MOTION: Steve Skadron moved to continue the public hearing on the Snyder
Park Affordable Housing Project PUD Amendment to August 2nd Brian Speck
seconded; all in favor, motion carried
PUBLIC HEARING:
HYMAN A VENUE APARTMENTS CONDOMINIUMS, SUBDIVISION &
GMQS
Jasmine Tygre opened the public hearing on the Hyman Avenue Apartments.
Jennifer Phelan provided the proof of notice, mailing and posting. Jennifer Phelan
said there was an existing four-plex at 306 South Garmisch and the applicant
proposed replacement of another four-plex with 2 free-market units and 2
affordable housing units. Phelan said the current zoning was residential multi-
family; the subdivision would be for the razing of the multi-family existing
structure; GMQS was for the affordable housing being created and the
condominiumization. Phelan said they met the Multi-family Housing Replacement
Program. Staff recommended approval with conditions.
Sunny Vann, representative for the applicant, introduced John Provine, the
applicant, and Janvar Derrington, architect. Vann said this 4 unit structure was
built in the 1970s that has housed working residents in the community from time to
time and is therefore subject to the City's Resident Multi-family Replacement
Program. Vann stated the project was designed to exceed all ofthe requirements
of that program as well as the RMF or Residential Multi-family dimensional
requirements. Vann stated that the applicant accepted the resolution with the
conditions.
The commission asked about vested property rights and condominiumization.
Public Comments:
1. Carol Blomquist asked the height of the varying levels of the building and
how it varies from what the existing height was; how many parking places were
there; how many bedrooms were there; and did the employee housing units go into
the lottery of the housing. Janvar Derrington replied the height to the ridge was at
37';2 feet, which was below the 42 feet allowed; the parking was off the alley with
6
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - Minutes AUl!:ust 02, 2005
Jasmine Tygre opened the regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting in
Sister Cities Meeting Room at 4:30 p.m. Commission Members Brian Speck, John
Rowland, Steve Skadron, Dylan Johns, Ruth Kruger and Jasmine Tygre were
present. Brandon Marion was excused. Staff in attendance were Joyce Allgaier,
Sarah Oates, Chris Bendon and James Lindt, Community Development and Jackie
Lothian, Deputy City Clerk.
COMMENTS
Ruth Kruger asked about an asset study. Joyce Allgaier said there was a county
asset study. James Lindt noted that they were looking into improving the meeting
spaces. Allgaier said that the city council meeting room was being upgraded.
Allgaier distributed surveys on the Chart House.
MINUTES
MOTION: Steve Skadron moved to approve the minutes from July 5th and June
2 1"t.. seconded by Dylan Johns, all in favor, motion carried
DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
John Rowland rescued himself on the Snyder Affordable Housing PUD
Amendment and the Hyman Avenue Condominiums, Subdivision and GMQS.
Dylan Johns disclosed that several years ago he did some pre-development studies
on the Park Avenue variance but is not involved in any way with the project now.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING (07119/05):
SNYDER AFFORDABLE HOUSING PUD AMENDMENT
Jasmine Tygre opened the continued public hearing for the Snyder Affordable
Housing PUD Amendment. James Lindt stated this was a continued public hearing
by the Snyder Park Homeowners Association to finish out 8 ofthe I-bedroom unit
basements.
Lindt said at the last meeting the commission had concerns about the ability of
adding bedrooms in the basements because of the parking concerns in the
neighborhood. The applicant felt that more parking on the site would hamper the
dynamics of the existing site so they have not proposed additional parking but have
amended their request to just finish the basements. Condition A in the resolution
would prohibit bedrooms in the finished basements; staff recommended approval.
Sarah Broughton stated they understood the issues of parking in the neighborhood
and have looked at parking on the site but would rather not have it as a condition of
approval for tonight. Dan Glick said there were 750 square feet in the basements
and 750 square feet on the ground floor. Glick said that he doesn't want another
1
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - Minutes Aue:ust 02, 2005
bedroom but rather an office because his office is in his dining room. Broughton
added to the record 2 letters of support from Frank McDonald from 327 Midland
Avenue and Heidi Hoffman.
Steve Skadron said that basements were not discussed. Tygre replied that was
correct. Lindt responded that basements came about in the construction phase.
Ruth Kruger was not in attendance at the last hearing so she will abstain from the
vote.
Dylan John asked if the bathrooms could be limited to a ';2 baths or powder rooms.
Lindt said they could propose a condition to that nature.
Jasmine Tygre asked how will they police those areas so they do not turn into
bedrooms. Lindt responded that the condition was based on the building code
definition of what a bedroom is so what they were prohibiting was a closet, direct
access to a bathroom and the intension of the room is for sleeping along with the
light and ventilation requirements of the building code for a bedroom. Tygre
stated that she wanted to help the people at Snyder have additional living space
without going through an unenforceable condition concerning the second bedroom.
Lindt replied the reality was that community development does get complaints
from neighbors; there was not a good concrete way to do enforcement other than
neighbor complaints.
Dan Glick said the way the complex is set up you see people coming and going
and everyone knows everyone and they do not want their density increased. Glick
said they do not want renters or strange people coming and going. Broughton said
if an owner were to sell housing does an audit on the unit.
Public Comments:
1. Bill Taylor, Snyder resident, who just married Nancy said it would be great
to be able to utilize the downstairs space.
2. Rob Loventhal, Snyder resident, stated he has a I-bedroom also with the
bath through the bedroom and he was very thankful to have the unit but also would
like to improve the living condition. Loventhal said he has no plans to ever rent
any space in his house.
3. Don Brown, Snyder resident, stated it would be nice to be able to use as a
den or entertaining space outside of the dining room. Brown said he did not want
to add renters.
2
-
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - Minutes Aue:ust 02, 2005
4. Ruth Wade, Ardmore Subdivision resident, said they all went though a long
process to come up with a compromise for everybody on the initial planning of
this subdivision and should stick with that. Wade said that the people who live at
Snyder signed up as Snyder is now and it seems to work right now. Wade
submitted a letter into the record.
5. Nancy Dahl worked on the project and she said that limiting to a Yo bath was
an interesting idea but doesn't want to see a bedroom. Dahl said the neighborhood
was impacted enough.
6. Antoinette LaFountaine, Snyder resident, said that she uses the room for
exercise; there were telephone and television hook-ups, the room was carpeted and
the wall were finished. LaFountaine said the bath was a very crucial thing; most
homes have 2 toilets. LaFountaine said that no one wanted to rent out that space
they just wanted to be able to use it.
7. John Redman, Snyder resident, said he was in a 3-bedroom and when your
guests have to sleep in the living room and go through your bedroom to the
bathroom that was not good. Redman said that no one was leaving their unit and
they need to have more livable units.
8. Jim Rose, Ardmore, said that he lives in a free market unit with only one
bathroom. Rose said the illegal bathrooms have not been addressed.
9. Bob Wade, Ardmore, said that they were happy when the project came
through and nothing has changed drastically to require a change in the way that
these units are used. Wade said he was against the change.
Rob Loventhal said that they had a meeting with Lee from housing in the very
beginning of the process when they won the lottery; Lee went through specific
conditions with the unit owners if basements were rented out. Rob Loventhal said
there were 2 units with finished spaces; one was Ms. LaFountaine's. Rob
Loventhal said that they would never rent the space but housing had guidelines for
rental. Tygre said that it was a shame that the approvals given by P&Z and
Council were in a sense contradicted by the Housing Authority.
Dylan Johns said to put in a Yo bath would be acceptable. Tygre clarified that
would not have a tub or shower. Johns said that it should be able to be regulated
through tap and permitting. Lindt said a condition was recommended that required
building permits.
3
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - Minutes AUl!:ust 02, 2005
Steve Skadron said that he did not take lightly past debates and decisions however
this decision directly lends itselfto satisfying the primary goal of the Aspen Area
Community Plan; he said that he could support this amendment. Skadron said that
he could support Dylan's suggestion. Tygre agreed with Steve and Dylan on the Y2
bath/powder room.
Broughton said that they were approached by the Housing Board and Community
Development to go forward with this PUD Amendment to show how affordable
housing can be flexible. Broughton said none of the owners asked her to create a
bedroom in the basement only a bathroom. Tygre said that she felt sympathetic for
them getting conflicting information.
MOTION: Dylan Johns moved to approve Resolution #22, series 2005,
recommending that City Council approve with conditions, the requested
amendment to allow for eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units (ADA 1-
bedroom unit not included) in the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD to finish
their unfinished basements adding to Section 1 This language shall not preclude
the owners from having the ability to install a powderoom (to only contain at most
1 toilet and 1 sink) in the basement as long as the other rooms are not intended to
be used for sleeping purposes. Seconded by Steve Skadron. Roll call vote: Speck,
yes; Skadron, yes; Johns, yes; Tygre, yes; Kruger, abstain. APPROVED 4-0.
PUBLIC HEARING:
ASPEN JuNIOR HOCKEY SPA AMENDMENT
Jasmine Tygre opened the public hearing for Aspen Junior Hockey SPA
Amendment. James Lindt provided proof of notice.
Meeting adjourned.
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
4
m
r.t.
a'
t.'"
fo.:.
+
t..:.
\,0
,001
1\)
~-O
"tlg:~
mcno
.z~."
Or-lo
Omen
""Z"tl
_lom
OlcnZ
:::-1
"
.ol!i
-
II
:J
Q.
+
~ _ 0'
8 g...
,. 10
I "C
c/O
I il::r
....
:00
.. Q.:J
!" c:
t !
II i
..
.. oQ
~ ::t
-
~1'Tf
Ii:;
. ~
I' ~
, -
" "
i; ;:
~
II/IIi!
"""......
"
,
RESOLUTION NO. 22
(SERIES OF 2005)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION, RECOMMENDING THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A PUD
AMENDMENT TO THE SNYDER PARK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
TO ALLOW FOR UNFINISHED BASEMENTS TO BE CONVERTED TO
LIVABLE SPACE AND FINISHED, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, represented by Rowland and Broughton
Architecture and Urban Design, requesting approval of a POO amendment to allow for
the eight (8) I-bedroom units (ADA accessible I-bedroom unit not included) that were
constructed with unfinished basements to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, City Council approved the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD
pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998, allowing for the construction of six 3-
bedroom and eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units in Snyder Park
SubdivisionIPUD; and,
WHEREAS, the eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units were constructed
with unfinished basements that were not allowed to be finished with bedrooms under the
original development approvals; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development Department and the AspenlPitkin County Housing Board
recommended approval of the requested amendment to provide the ability for unit owners to
finish the basements in the eight (8) I-bedroom units with additional bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on July 5, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission continued review of the application until July 19, 2005; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on July 19,2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission continued review of the application until August 2, 2005; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on August 2, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 22, Series of 2005, by a four to zero (4-0)
vote, recommending that City Council approve with conditions, a PUD amendment to the
Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD allowing for the eight (8) I-bedroom units that were
constructed with w1finished basements to finish their basements; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code
as identified herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Plauning and Zoning Commission finds that the development
proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the
development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements ofthe
Aspen Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1:
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends that City Council approve a
PUD amendment to the Snyder Park PUD allowing for the unfinished basements in the
eight (8) I-bedroom units (not including the ADA accessible I-bedroom unit because it does
not have an unfinished basement) to be finished, with the following conditions:
I. A building permit shall be applied for and approved to finish each of the
individual basements. The finished basements shall meet the applicable
building code requirements that are in place at the time of building permit
submittal. .
2. The basements shall not contain cooking devices, thereby reinforcing that
the finished basements are not to be used as an additional, stand-alone
dwelling unit.
3. The owners of the subject units that finish their basements shall not be
allowed to be reimbursed for more than 10% of the actual costs of capital
improvements to the units upon the initial sale of the improved units
pursuant to the affordable housing guidelines.
4. The basements in the eight I-bedroom units shall not be allowed to
include bedrooms. Bedrooms are defined as a portion of a dwelling unit
intended to be used for sleeping purposes, which contain closets, have
access to a bathroom and which meet the International Building Code
requirements for light and ventilation. This language shall not preclude
the owners from having the ability to install a powderoom (to only contain
at most I toilet and I sink) in the basement as long as the other rooms *I'll;: hlJ,J{
not i'1b-9B9111 be used for sleeping purposes.
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Plarullng and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 3:
This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 2nd
day of August, 2005.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
0~ I JJ-
City Attorney
ATTEST:
~
MEMORANDUM
1J[^,
~V\
Gf'dt"
. [
c' ,
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
Aspen Planni~5t ~ Zoning Commission
Joyce Allgai~mmunity Development Deputy Director
James Lindt, Senior PlannerJI-
Snyder Park Affordable Housing Project PUD Amendment,
Resolution No. ~, Series of 2005- Public Hearinl!. Continued from
7/5
July 19,2005
DATE:
PROJECT: SNYDER PARK pun AMENDMENT
REQUEST: The Applicant is reqnesting a PUD amendment to the Snyder Park
Affordable Honsing PUD to allow for the nnfinished basements on the
one-bedroom units to be finished with a variety of room uses, including
bedrooms and bathrooms.
ZONING: AHIPUD (Affordable HousingIPUD)
LAND USE The Applicant is requesting approval of a PUD amendment to the
REQUESTS: Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD pursuant to the procedures
established in Land Use Code Section 26.445.1 OO(B), Amendment of
pun development order.
STAFF Staff recommends approval with conditions.
RECOMMENDA TION:
LAND USE ACTIONS REQUESTED:
The Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD,
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall be the recommending body to City Council
after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Director
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100, Amendment of PUD Development Order.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST AND BACKGROUND:
The Applicant, Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, is requesting a PUD amendment
to amend the PUD that was approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998
(attached as Exhibit "D"). Snyder Park consists of fifteen (15) units in total; six 3-
bedroom units and nine I-bedroom units.
The Applicant would like to amend the PUD to allow for the unfinished basements in
eight (8) of the nine I-bedroom units to be finished with a variety of room uses, including
bedrooms and bathrooms. The ninth I-bedroom unit is not proposed for expansion
because it is currently slab on grade construction. Originally, these units were approved
to be built as slab-on-grade construction with no crawl spaces or basements. However,
when the units came in for building permit, a crawl space was required to be constructed
- I -
.....~,.,
~-,
for egress purposes under each of the units. Subsequently during the excavation for the
construction of the crawl spaces, the contractors ran into soils that were not good load
bearing soils where the floor of the crawl spaces were to be built. In the end, the units
were constructed with full-height, unfinished basements. Several of the units have since
finished their basements, but they have not been allowed to include bedrooms or
bathrooms because of the possible impacts associated with adding bedrooms to the site.
STAFF COMMENTS:
In reviewing the PUD amendment request, Staff feels that the flexibility that would be
provided through this proposal allowing the I-bedroom affordable housing units to be
finished with bedrooms is a positive action. As the application asserts, Staff feels that
provisions for unit expandability are important in the development of affordable housing
projects in order to allow for unit owners to hold onto their units longer as their families
grow and they proceed through different life stages. And in the long run, Staff believes
that longer occupancy of affordable housing units builds neighborhood coherence and
character that we seek in Aspen.
The issue of unit expandability received considerable discussion during the recent review
of the Burlingame Affordable Housing Project and the majority of City Council felt that
it was appropriate to include provisions for unit expandability in the Burlingame project.
Applying the same logic to the Snyder Park project that was constructed in 1998, the
Planning Staff and the Housing Board support the proposed request.
As far as traffic and parking impacts are concerned, Staff believes that the addition of a
bedroom to each of the eight (8) I-bedroom units would have a minimal impact on both
traffic and parking. The number of off-street parking spaces provided in the development
is two (2) parking spaces for each of the units that contain two (2) or more bedrooms and
one parking space for each of the units that currently contain one bedroom. Staff feels the
majority of the finished basement spaces that would result from this amendment will
likely be used by people that already live in Snyder Park units and are not likely to create
a significant increase in traffic or parking demand. Staff also feels the close proximity of
Snyder to the core of town and on an in-town bus route, will encourage walking,
bicycling, and use of public transportation by residents of the additional bedrooms.
However, Staff does believe that if the Applicants are able to rent out the additional
bedrooms, it could exacerbate any parking issues that may exist in the neighborhood. In
response to this concern, Staff has proposed a condition of approval in the attached
resolution requiring that the additional bedrooms in the finished basement are not allowed
to be rented.
The one-bedroom units are all deed-restricted as Category 3 or lower and the
Housing Authority has recommended requiring a condition of approval that when
each of the units apply for a building permit to finish the basements with an
additional bedroom, that they be reqnired to demonstrate compliance with the
minimum unit size in the housing guidelines for a 2-bedroom unit. The Housing
Authority has further recommended that the expanded units will only be allowed to
be sold as I-bedroom units as they were originally established and that owners will
- 2 -
,,-
~
still not be able to be reimbursed for more than 10% of the actual costs of the
capital improvements pursuant to the Affordable Housing Guidelines. Other
conditions included in the proposed resolution limit the number of bedrooms that
are to be installed in the basement of each unit to one additional bedroom and
disallow the installation of a cooking device in the basements, thereby keeping the
finished basement from becoming separate, additional dwelling units.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the attached
resolution, recommending that City Council approve the proposed PUD amendment with
the conditions contained therein.
.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Resolution No~ Series of 2005, recommending that City Council
approve with conditions, the requested PUD amendment to allow for the eight (8) 1-
bedroom affordable housing units (ADA I-bedroom unit not included) in the Snyder Park
Affordable Housing PUD to finish their basements to include additional bedrooms."
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT A - REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS
EXHIBIT B - ApPLICATION
EXHIBIT C - REFERRAL COMMENTS
EXHIBIT D - ORDINANCE No. 24, SERIES OF 1998
EXHIBIT E - LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC
- 3 -
RESOLUTION NO. ~
(SERIES OF 2005)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION, RECOMMENDING THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A PUD
AMENDMENT TO THE SNYDER PARK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
TO ALLOW FOR UNFINISHED BASEMENTS TO BE CONVERTED TO
LIVABLE SPACE AND FINISHED WITH A VARIETY OF ROOM USES
INCLUDING BEDROOMS AND BATHROOMS, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN
COUNTY, COLORADO.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, represented by Rowland and Broughton
Architecture and Urban Design, requesting approval of a PUD amendment to allow for
the eight (8) I-bedroom units (ADA accessible I-bedroom unit not included) that were
constructed with unfinished basements to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, City Council approved the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD
pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998, allowing for the construction of six 3-
bedroom and eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units in Snyder Park
SubdivisionIPUD; and,
WHEREAS, the eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units were constructed
with unfinished basements that were not allowed to be finished with bedrooms under the
original development approvals; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development Department and the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Board
recommended approval of the requested amendment to provide the ability for unit owners to
finish the basements in the eight (8) I-bedroom units with additional bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on July 5, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. _' Series of 2005, by a _ to _ L-
-.J vote, recommending that City Council approve with conditions, a PUD amendment to
the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD allowing for the eight (8) I-bedroom units that
were constructed with unfinished basements to finish their basements, and allowing for the
basements to contain one bedroom; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code
as identified herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development
proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the
development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the
Aspen Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section I:
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends that City Council approve a
PUD amendment to the Snyder Park PUD allowing for the unfinished basements in the
eight (8) I-bedroom units (not including the ADA accessible I-bedroom unit because it does
not have an unfinished basement) to be finished, and to allow for each of the finished
basements to contain one bedroom, with the following conditions:
I. A building permit shall be applied for and approved to finish each of the
individual basements. As part of the building permit application for each
individual basement, the owner shall demonstrate compliance with the
minimum unit size as set forth in the Affordable Housing Guidelines for
the proposed unit type (i.e. 2-bedroom unit). The finished basements shall
meet the applicable building code requirements that are in place at the
time of building permit submittal.
2. The basements shall not contain cooking devices, thereby reinforcing that
the finished basements are not to be used as an additional, stand-alone
dwelling unit.
3. The owners of the subject units that finish their basements shall not be
allowed to be reimbursed for more than 10% of the actual costs of capital
improvements to the units upon the initial sale of the improved units
pursuant to the affordable housing guidelines.
4. The units subject to this amendment shall be resold as one-bedroom units
even though they may contain two bedrooms after the basements are
finished.
5. The bedrooms to be added in the basements shall not be rented out. The
Applicant shall record an amended deed restriction in conjunction with
obtaining a building permit to finish each of the individual basements that
describes said prohibition on renting the bedrooms.
6. Any bedrooms to be added to the basements shall be located such that
there is direct access from the bedrooms to the existing egress wells in
order to meet the egress requirements of the building code without altering
the exterior of the structures.
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
-
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 3:
This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 5th
day ofJuly, 2005.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
City Attorney
Jasmine Tygre, Chair
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
,.
""....,.,
EXHIBIT A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT
Review Criteria & Staff Findings
In accordance with Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, the Applicants have requested
a PUD Amendment.
Section 26.445.050, Review Standards: PUD Amendment
Section 26.445 of the Regulations provides that development applications for a PUD
amendment must comply with the following standards and requirements.
A. General Requirements.
J. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area
Community Plan.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with the affordable housing
goals of the AACP. Staff feels that the amendment will allow for the homeowner's at
Snyder Park to have the flexibility to occupy their units for the long-term and allow for
the units to change with their different life stages allowing them to be vested members of
the community as is encouraged by the Housing section of the AACP. Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing
land uses in the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with character of the existing
land uses in the immediate area. The proposed amendment will not change the exterior
aesthetics of the units in that unfinished basements already exist with the necessary
egress. Moreover, the units will continue to be family-oriented affordable housing units.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development
o/the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will adversely affect the future
development of the surrounding area in any manner. Thus, Staff finds this criterion not
to be applicable to this application.
4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is
exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the
proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, final
PUD development plan review.
-4 -
,""-
Staff Finding
The Applicants have already received the needed GMQS exemptions to construct the
affordable housing, a GMQS exemption is not needed to add a bedroom. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable.
B. Establishment of Dimensional Requirements:
The final PUD development plans shall establish the dimensional requirements for
all properties within the PUD. The dimensional requirements of the underlying
zone district shall be used as a guide in determining the appropriate dimensions for
the PUD. During review of the proposed dimensional requirements, compatibility
with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns shall be emphasized.
I. The proposed dimensional requirements for the subject property are appropriate
and compatible with the following influences on the property:
a) The character of, and compatibility with, existing and expected future
land uses in the surrounding area.
b) Natural and man-made hazards.
c) Existing natural characteristics of the property and surrounding area
such as steep slopes, waterways, shade, and significant vegetation and
landforms.
d) Existing and proposed man-made characteristics of the property and
the surrounding area such as noise, traffic, transit, pedestrian
circulation, parking, and historical resources.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment does not impact the dimensional requirements that were
approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
application.
2. The proposed dimensional requirements permit a scale, massing, and quantity
of open space and site coverage appropriate and favorable to the character of
the proposed PUD and of the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment does
approved in the original PUD.
application.
not impact the dimensional requirements that were
Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
3. The appropriate number of off-street parking spaces shall be established
based on the following considerations:
a) The probable number of cars used by those using the proposed
development including any non-residential land uses.
b) The varying time periods of use, whenever joint use of common parking
is proposed
c) The availability of public transit and other transportation facilities,
including those for pedestrian access and/or the commitment to utilize
automobile disincentive techniques in the proposed development.
- 5 -
,.",
.....,
....,,,,.,,
d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and
general activity centers in the city.
Staff Finding
As was discussed in the staff memo, Staff feels that many of the bedrooms that would be
added to the basements of these units will be occupied by people that already live within
the development. Staff is further of the opinion that the close proximity of this
development to town and to an in-city bus route encourages limited parking demand for
the inhabitants of the additional bedrooms that would be provided by this amendment. In
addition, Staff has proposed a condition of approval in the resolution requiring that the
new bedrooms in the basements not be allowed to be rented out by the owners. Staff
finds this criterion to be met.
4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced (f there
exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum
density of a PUD may be reduced if:
a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other
utilities to service the proposed development.
b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal,
and road maintenance to the proposed development.
Staff Finding
Staff has consulted the applicable utility agencies, who have expressed that the adequate
infrastructure exists to accommodate the proposed amendments. Staff finds this criterion
to be met.
5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there
exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the
maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if:
a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground
instability or the possibility of mudflow, rock falls or avalanche dangers.
b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural
watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water
pollution.
c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in
the surrounding area and the City.
d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or
trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or
causes harmful disturbance to critical naturalfeatures of the site.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment does not alter the permitted density of units approved in the
original PUD. Additionally, the proposed amendment involves finishing livable
space that is already incorporated within the subject buildings. Therefore, finishing
the basements with bedrooms and other uses will not have an impact on site drainage,
soil erosion or consequential water pollution. The Applicant also is not requesting to
- 6 -
~
amend the site layout so there will not be impact on the natural features of the site.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
6. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there
exists a significant community goal to be achieved through such increase
and the development pattern is compatible with its surrounding
development patterns and with the site's physical constraints. Specifically,
the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if:
a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as
expressed in the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) or a specific area
plan to which the property is subject.
b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and
there exists no negative physical characteristics of the site, as identified
in subparagraphs 4 and 5, above, those areas can be avoided, or those
characteristics mitigated.
c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattern
compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding existing and
expected development pattern, land uses, and characteristics.
Staff Finding
As was discussed in the body of the staff memo, Staff feels that allowing for an
additional bedroom in each of the eight (8) unfinished basement spaces fosters long-term
occupancy of the affordable housing units, which builds neighborhood coherence and
character as is encouraged by the AACP. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
B. Site Design:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the PUD enhances public spaces, is
complimentary to the site's natural and man-made features and the adjacent
public spaces, and ensures the public's health and safety. The proposed
development shall comply with thefollowing:
I. Existing natural or man-made features of the site which are unique,
provide visual interest or a specific reference to the past, or contribute to
the identity of the town are preserved or enhanced in an appropriate
manner.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment impacts the site design of the project.
Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
2. Structures have been clustered to appropriately preserve significant open
spaces and vistas.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment impacts open spaces or vistas on the
site. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
3. Structures are appropriately oriented to public streets, contribute to the
urban or rural context where appropriate, and provide visual interest and
engagement of vehicular and pedestrian movement.
- 7-
.~
~",...,
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact the existing siting of structures on the parcel
and will affect the extent to which the units are visually interesting. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency
and service vehicle access.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not impact the emergency and service
vehicle access that was approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not impact the pedestrian and
handicapped access that was approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not
to be applicable to this application.
6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical
and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding
properties.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact the site drainage since the amendment will
only impact interior space that is already built. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately
de-signed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the
use.
Staff Finding
There are no non-residential land uses proposed as part of this amendment and no non-
residential uses exist within the subject development. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
C. Landscape Plan:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed
landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and
with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The propo.~ed
development shall comply with thefollowing:
- 8 -
"-'-
..-.....
I. The landscape plan exhibits a well designed treatment of exterior spaces,
preserving existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity
and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the landscaping plan that
was approved in relation to the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
2. Significant existing natural and man-made site features, which provide
uniqueness and interest in the landscape, are preserved or enhanced in an
appropriate manner.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the existing natural or
man-made site features any more than the original development plan. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
3. The proposed method of protecting existing vegetation and other landscape
features is appropriate.
Staff Finding
The site's landscaping will not be impacted by the proposed amendment. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
D. Architectural Character:
It is the purpose of this standard to encourage architectural interest, variety,
character, and visual identity in the proposed development and within the City
while promoting efficient use of resources. Architectural character is based
upon the suitability of a building for its purposes, legibility of the building's
use, the building's proposed massing, proportion, scale, orientation to public
spaces and other buildings, use of materials, and other attributes which may
significantly represent the character of the proposed development. There shall
be approved as part of the final development plan and architectural character
plan, which adequately depicts the character of the proposed development. The
proposed architecture of the development shall:
I. be compatible with or enhance the visual character of the city,
appropriately relate to existing and proposed architecture of the property,
represent a character suitable for, and indicative of, the intended use, and
respect the scale and massing of nearby historical and cultural resources.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not alter the architecture and exterior design of the units in
that the amendment is only requesting to finish interior space. Staff finds this criterion
not to be applicable to this application.
- 9 -
.........
2. Incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking
advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use
of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not alter the extent to which the units
incorporate natural heating and cooling systems. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
3. Accommodate the storage and shielding of snow, ice, and water in a safe an
appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the ability at which the
development accommodates the shielding of snow, ice, and water in that the proposed
amendment simply requests to finish interior space that already exists. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
E. Lighting:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be
lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general
aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished:
I. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous
interference of any king to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site
features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner.
Staff Finding
The original PUD requires that all exterior lighting meet the lighting code requirements
of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. The proposed amendment will not impact the
development's compliance with the lighting code. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
2. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting
Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD
documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and
lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for
residential development.
Staff Finding
The original PUD requires that all exterior lighting meet the lighting code requirements
of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. The proposed amendment will not impact the
development's compliance with the lighting code. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area:
If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or
recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD,
the following criteria shall be met:
- 10-
,..,._..."..~---,,,,,,.",,<-~---"
,
~L'.......
I. The proposed amount, location, and design of the common park, open
space, or recreation area enhances the character of the proposed
development, considering existing and proposed structures and natural
landscape features of the property, provides visual relief to the property's
built form, and is available to the mutual benefit of the various land uses
and property users of the PUD.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact common park or open space. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
2. A proportionate, undivided interest in all common park and recreation areas
is deeded in perpetuity (not for a number of years) to each lot or dwelling
unit owner within the PUD or ownership is proposed in a similar manner.
Staff Finding
This amendment does not impact the project's compliance with this requirement. Staff
finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
3. There is proposed an adequate assurance through legal instrument for the
permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and
shared facilities together with a deed restriction against future residential,
commercial, or industrial development.
Staff Finding
This amendment does not impact the project's compliance with this requirement. Staff
finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application.
H. Utilities and Public Facilities:
The purpo.~e of this standard is to ensure the development does not impose any
undue burden on the City's infrastructure capabilities and that the public does
not incur an unjustified financial burden. The proposed utilities and public
facilities associated with the development shall comply with the following:
I. Adequate public infrastructure facilities exist to accommodate the
development.
Staff Finding
During the review of the original PUD application, it was determined that adequate
public facilities exist to accommodate the proposal. This amendment does not impact the
project's compliance with this requirement. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable
to this application.
2. Adverse impacts on public infrastructure by the development will be
mitigated by the necessary improvements at the sole cost of the developer.
- II -
-
~,
Staff Finding
The affected utility agencies have reviewed the proposed plans and did not express any
public infrastructure concerns. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided
appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the
additional improvement.
Staff Finding
The Applicants are not proposing to install oversized utilities or public facilities and it is
not anticipated that the Applicants will be required by the City to provide oversized
utilities. This amendment will not impact the size of utilities or public facilities that are
needed to accommodate the development. Staff does not find this criterion to be
applicable to this application.
L Acces~' and Circulation (Only standards I & 2 apply to Minor PUD
applications):
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible,
does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate
pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security
gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the
following criteria:
I. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access
to a public street either directly or through and approved private road, a
pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use.
Staff Finding
This amendment does not impact the development's compliance with this requirement.
Provisions were made in the original PUD approval to insure the adequate access is
provided to the development. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
application.
2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking
arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the
proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be
improved to accommodate the development.
- 12 -
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the vehicular access points approved as part of the original
development do not create traffic congestion on the surrounding roads. This amendment
will not impact the development's compliance with this requirement. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
J. Phasing of Development Plan.
The purpose of these criteria is to ensure partially completed projects do not
create an unnecessary burden on the public or surrounding property owners
and impacts of an individual phase are mitigated adequately. If phasing of the
development plan is proposed, each phase shall be defined in the adopted final
PUD development plan. The phasing plan shall comply with the following:
I. All phases, including the initial phase, shall be designed to function as a
complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases.
2. The phasing plan describes physical areas insulating, to the extent
practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases.
3. The proposed phasing plan ensures the necessary or proportionate
improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu,
construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the PUD,
construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation
measures are realized concurrent or prior to the respective impacts
associated with the phase.
Staff Finding
It is anticipated that all of the unit owners will not finish their basements right way upon
approval. The required park development impact fees shall be assessed in conjunction
with issuance of a building permit to finish each individual basement. Each individual
building permit shall require a construction management plan to minimize construction
impacts on neighboring property owners. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
-13 -
~
,.,
,.....,
E-xhllo)'~ liB!
,
rowland+broughton
architecture and urban design
27 April 2005
City of Aspen Community Development
City of Aspen Housing Department
Re: Snyder Park PUD Amendment
Dear Sirs and Madams,
Rowland + Broughton Architecture and Urban Design is representing the homeowner's at Snyder
Park Affordable Housing Planned Unit Development in seeking a PUD Amendment.
Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD was approved in 1998. It has since been built with (15)
affordable housing units, (6) three-bedroom units and (9) one-bedroom units. The one-bedroom
units were all built with unfinished basements and window wells for egress. The plans originally
called for slab on grade construction; however basements were added closer to construction.
The owners of the one-bedroom units are interested in being able to fit-out their unfinished
basements into a variety of uses. These uses include: home offices, playrooms, storage, bedrooms
and bathrooms. Under the current approved PUD, additional bedrooms and bathrooms are not
allowed.
This application is asking for a PUD Amendment to allow the homeowners at Snyder Park the option
to convert existing, unfinished basement space into a variety of different uses, including the possibility
of a bedroom and bathroom.
The review standards relevant to this application are the land use code for Planned Unit Development,
Chapter 26.445. Specifically for our PUD Amendment, the following items apply:
26.445.050.A.1- The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Alea Community Plan.
Allowing for an additional bedroom and bathroom to be developed in the unfinished basements at
Snyder Park directly relates to the goal of Aspen's affordable housing program to build community.
Our community is based on a healthy mix of people, who can call Aspen home. Flexibility is a key
component in creating the mix of people. Young people move to Aspen, often find a partner and
possibly start a family. Our housing needs to allow for the flexibility of life and encourage roots to be
established.
26.445.050.A.2- The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land
uses in the surrounding alea.
The east side of town is residential and is going through a major redevelopment. As house prices
soar, more locals are forced out of the City. By allowing for an additional bedroom and bathroom to
be developed in the unfinished basements, homeowners at Snyder Park will have more options to
remain in residency in the City. The option to develop the unfinished basements gives the
homeowner the ability to add value to their property all within the Housing Department's guidelines.
'\ of 2.
~~ <':.. ,;,
;;:" ~~. .~~:
~;::! '.;
,,:. .', ;;~
~",-
c",o
c....o
?E""'(l)
ag:~
~.. 0
-~o
""'0
5.!e.~
"',
," '"
Oro ~
c_"
",,,,CD
"'~-
-0'"
0", '"
~- .
00.0)
0" '"
3~'O
<CD
~. Ql ::I
0' n
-n 0
=0
n '"
""'-
@o'"
a~:::
:cOl.,.
is'' _
~-
0.",'"
g-fJ ~
o. en
c",..
"'0..
"''''.
_. '"
0-0
~"'o
b""-lO)
0"'.
3.' ..
;;;'"
0....
"'~
. '"
"'..
0..
"'.
. '"
~..
"'....
U('"
~"""""""".~'--'_.'---
.
,......
,#"',",
Snyder Park PUD Amendment Application
26.445.050.8.6- The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a
significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattem is
compatible with its surrounding development pattems and with the site's physical constraints.
Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if:
a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen
Area Community Plan.
b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no
negative physical characteristics of the site
c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattem compatible with, and
complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattem, land uses and
characteristics.
This PUD Amendment meets all of the conditions mentioned above.
Through many conversations with both the City of Aspen Housing Board and City of Aspen
Community Development, we strongly believe that by adopting a PUD Amendment to allow for the
development of the unfinished basements at Snyder Park takes us further to the goal of flexible,
diverse and balanced affordable housing.
We welcome any conversation or questions regarding this application.
~
Sarah Broughton, AlA
Cc: Snyder Park Homeowners
2 of 2.
,-
,-
=
~.J2~
II
z
[,.!J
~-
"'=
VJ
~
:::
~;~~~:~~;:~~~~~
~'~;:JZ:::I: ~l~
ir. Ii:;
w~'~~'~~.l _
--
"w,
}
,,,.,,~
"
>
'0
"
,
~,
,
(.".,
-----=
""',-
""-'0
~~
,
,
~ '"" ~~
"'
"
.
"
i
.
V' 1 1 " ~
""
""
~?
"
""
'''L
"
'"
"
o
,
";".,,,
;, J, , : ~ .. "
"O'"O~~ ~"""
~"
""
""
ii5~
,.
"
I
!
.
"
J1l.~~
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
M o-h CJ V\ 0-5
Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission cJ.VII\ ~V\.& ~ fro
Joyce Allgaiei~~mmunity Development Deputy Director .N--. Qtl0W
James Lindt, Senior Planner.::JL-- .Y u f?nV"J
1\ \ I V\6J I:' - p:lI'
Snyder Park Affordable Housing Project PUD Amendment,
Resolution No. 22, Series of 2005- Public Hearin\!, Continued from
7/19
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
August 2, 2005
PROJECT: SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT
REQUEST: The Applicant is reqnesting a pun amendment to the Snyder Park
Affordable Housing pun to allow for the nnfinished basements on the
one-bedroom nnits to be finished with a variety of room nses, inclnding
bedrooms and bathrooms.
ZONING: AH/PUn (Affordable HousingIPUD)
-
LAND USE The Applicant is reqnesting approval of a pun amendment to the
REQUESTS: Snyder Park Affordable Honsing PUD pursnant to the procednres
established in Land Use Code Section 26.445.100(B), Amendment of
PUD develooment order.
STAFF Staff recommends approval with conditions.
RECOMMENDATION:
LAND USE ACTIONS REQUESTED:
The Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall be the recommending body to City Council
after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Director
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100, Amendment of PUD Development Order.
REVIEW SUMMARY:
At the previous meeting related to this application, it was apparent that the majority of the
Commission felt that adding a bedroom to each of the eight (8) unfinished basements
would exacerbate the parking issues that exist in the neighborhood, even with the
conditions of approval that Statl had proposed to mitigate this concern. However, the
majority of the Commission also appeared to believe that it was appropriate to allow for
the units to finish the currently unfinished basement space with habitable space as long as
that habitable space does not include bedrooms. At the conclusion of the Commissioner
comments, the Applicant requested a continuance of the hearing in order to examine
whether additional on-site parking could be provided and whether the owners of the
subject Snyder Park units would be accepting of a condition allowing them to finish the
basements without the ability to add bedrooms.
- I -
STAFF COMMENTS:
The Snyder Park Homeowner's Association explored the possibility of providing more
parking within the existing development. The best location for additional parking within
the development was identified as being just north of the entry drive across from the
existing parking spaces for the park. However, in reviewing the option of providing for
more parking in this location, the Applicant has not been able to determine the costs that
would be associated with providing this parking and feels that the additional parking
could compromise the quality of the existing site dynamics to an undesirable extent.
Given that the Applicant does not wish to pursue providing additional parking within the
development due to the reasons above, Staff has drafted a proposed condition of approval
that would allow the owners of the eight I-bedroom units to finish the basements with
habitable space, but would prohibit the addition of bedrooms in the basement spaces per
the Commission's discussion at the last meeting. The proposed condition is as follows:
"The basements in the eight I-bedroom units shall not be allowed to include
bedrooms. Bedrooms are defined as a portion of a dwelling unit intended to be
usedfor sleeping purposes, which contain closets, have access to a bathroom and
which meet the International Building Code requirements for light and
ventilation. This language shall not preclude the owners fi"om having the ability
to install a bathroom in the basement as long as the other rooms arc not intended
to be usedfor sleeping purposes and do not contain closets. "
The condition described above has been included in the attached resolution (attached as
Exhibit "A"). Staff has also removed the remainder of the conditions from the proposed
resolution that related to adding bedrooms in the finished basements. The remaining
conditions speak to needing to obtain a building permit to finish the basement spaces.
Conditions of approval are also included in the proposed resolution about meeting the
applicable building code requirements and about limiting the reimbursement costs on
capital improvements to 10% of the capital improvement costs of the improved units.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the attached
resolution, recommending that City Council approve the proposed PUD amendment with
the conditions contained therein, including the condition about prohibiting bedrooms in
the finished basements.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Resolution N~, Series of 2005, recommending that City Council
approve with conditions, the requested PUD amendment to allow for the eight (8) 1-
bedroom affordable housing units (ADA I-bedroom unit not included) in the Snyder Park
Affordable Housing PUD to finish their unfinished basements."
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT A - REVISED RESOLUTION
EXHIBIT B - LETTER FROM ApPLICANT
- 2 -
SXt11tol'! ~\,1 a
RESOLUTION NO. 22
(SERIES OF 2005)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION, RECOMMENDING THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A PUD
AMENDMENT TO THE SNYDER PARK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
TO ALLOW FOR UNFINISHED BASEMENTS TO BE CONVERTED TO
LIVABLE SPACE AND FINISHED, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application
from the Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, represented by Rowland and Broughton
Architecture and Urban Design, requesting approval of a PUD amendment to allow for
the eight (8) I-bedroom units (ADA accessible I-bedroom unit not included) that were
constructed with unfinished basements to be finished with a variety of room uses,
including bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, City Council approved the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD
pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998, allowing for the construction of six 3-
bedroom and eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units in Snyder Park
Subdivision/PUD; and,
WHEREAS, the eight (8) I-bedroom affordable housing units were constructed
with unfinished basements that were not allowed to be finished with bedrooms under the
original development approvals; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards,
the Community Development Department and the AspenlPitkin County Housing Board
recommended approval of the requested amendment to provide the ability for unit owners to
finish the basements in the eight (8) I-bedroom units with additional bedrooms; and,
WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on July 5, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission continued review of the application until July 19, 2005; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on July 19, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission continued review of the application until August 2, 2005; and,
WHEREAS, during a continued public hearing on August 2, 2005, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 22, Series of2005, by a _ to _ L-
-.J vote, recommending that City Council approve with conditions, a PUD amendment to
the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD allowing for the eight (8) I-bedroom units that
were constructed with unfinished basements to finish their basements; and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions ofthe Municipal Code
as identified herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development
proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the
development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the
Aspen Area Community Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section I:
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends that City Council approve a
PUD amendment to the Snyder Park PUD allowing for the unfinished basements in the
eight (8) I-bedroom units (not including the ADA accessible I-bedroom unit because it does
not have an unfinished basement) to be finished, with the following conditions:
I. A building permit shall be applied for and approved to finish each of the
individual basements. The finished basements shall meet the applicable
building code requirements that are in place at the time of building permit
submittal.
2. The basements shall not contain cooking devices, thereby reinforcing that
the finished basements are not to be used as an additional, stand-alone
dwelling unit.
3. The owners of the subject units that finish their basements shall not be
allowed to be reimbursed for more than 10% of the actual costs of capital
improvements to the units upon the initial sale of the improved units
pursuant to the affordable housing guidelines.
4. The basements in the eight I-bedroom units shall not be allowed to
include bedrooms. Bedrooms are defined as a portion of a dwelling unit
intended to be used for sleeping purposes, which contain closets, have
access to a bathroom and which meet the International Building Code
requirements for lig~t and ve~tilation. Thi~~gl1~~.l>.iQ~[1pt precl\let; . j,/ ' k
the owners from havmg the abIlity to mstall ~ln'h'fe'M~~tr1t M "'1'1)0, SJ vi., \,
long as the other rooms are not intended to be used for Sle~ing purposes~
=..1 d~. I (ootaia elesets. .:.- O(rrN"\ I ).'" LO ft1e q'^ "l('lIq.1
Section 2: ~r-''' "-.11 f1j-JfILt'\
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are
hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied
with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity.
Section 3:
This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement
of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or
~ ,
amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such
prior ordinances.
Section 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any
reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 2nd
day of August, 2005.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
City Attorney
Jasmine Tygre, Chair
ATTEST:
Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
r' t -I' I \ \/~ 1/
t:: X III /;6 \ r ?::5
towland+broughton
architecture and urban design
27 July 2005
Mr. James Lindt
City of Aspen Community Development
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Snyder Park PUD Amendment
Dear James,
Rowland + Broughton Architecture and Urban Design is representing the homeowner's at Snyder
Park Affordable Housing Planned Unit Development in seeking a PUD Amendment.
We presented to Planning and Zoning on Tuesday, July 19, 2005. From this meeting we
understand the concerns the P&Z has with allowing additional bedrooms to be created within the
Snyder Park Development as it relates to density and parking issues. We have amended our
request for a PUD Amendment to include:
Allow for the unfinished basements in Snyder Park Affordable Housing Development to be converted
to livable space and finished. The livable basement space cannot contain bedrooms* or cooking
devices, thereby reinforcing that the finished basements will not house more people within the
development and cannot be used as additional, stand-alone dwelling units.
*Bedrooms are defined as a portion of a dwelling unit intended to be used for sleeping purposes,
which contain closets, have access to a bathroom and which meet the International Building Code
requirements for light and ventilation. This language will not preclude the owners of Snyder Park from
having the ability to install bathrooms in the basement as long as the other rooms within the basement
are not to be intended to be used for sleeping purposes and do not contain closets.
As previously stated, eight (8) of the nine (9) one-bedroom units in Snyder Park were built with
unfinished basements including window wells for egress. It is the intention of the owners to be able to
finish these basements to allow for a variety of uses, not including bedrooms. Several of the one-
bedroom units are arranged so that a guest has to travel through the bedroom to reach the only
bathroom. By allowing for the basements to be finished and possibly with an additional bathroom, it
creates further flexibility to the homeowner.
We believe that this request for a PUD Amendment is consistent with the Aspen Area Community
Plan and by allowing the basements to be finished without adding additional bedrooms, Snyder Park
remains compatible with the surrounding neighborhood context and creates no negative physical
characteristics of the site.
On the issue of parking. Snyder Park strives to be a good neighbor and we therefore explored ways to
mitigate any parking issues for the neighborhood within the site. There is an opportunity to include
additional parking on the north side of Kathryn Way across from the existing visitor parking. Four to
five parking spots could be built in this area with some major landscape reworking. There is concern
1 of 2
."'~
:f~g
~-....JCD
o2:~
~ III 0
~$.g
O-W m
~~ ~
o m ~
C_m
",,,m
"- -
00 ~
=:;?"J!-'J
Oa.aJ
Om w
3 ~-g
m ~
0" 0
=;g 0
gco~
~;;3~
oo~
.'"
'" -
~Z;co
0"0""
o:>>~
C"'..
~~f'"
o:.....;g
~"'o
(j-JQ')
0'"
3 ~
;:;'"
0""
",0
w~
~:P-
:....~
w...,
~'"
within the development that by creating these parking spots the overall site plan will be compromised.
The homeowners are inquiring about the cost of adding these parking spots, however, at this time
they ask that the parking spots not be included in this application as a condition of approval.
With approval of this PUD Amendment, each homeowner will be required to apply for a building permit
to finish their individual basements and must meet all applicable building code requirements.
Additionally, if the owner elects to finish their basement they shall only be reimbursed for no more than
10% of the actual costs of capital improvements to the unit upon the initial sale of the improved unit
pursuant to the affordable housing guidelines.
We look forward to discussing this application on August 2, 2005.
Thank you,
Sarah Broughton, AlA
Cc: Snyder Park Homeowners
2 of 2
08/02/2085 86:55
J
Frank McDo aid
734-528-6358
F B MCDONALlJ lMl4Jlo< 1 ~
rHUc. t./.I.
i:ltt.~ I VI l
,
"S~ M. Broughton" <lBrahOmwtBndbfoug~fn.com>
<m~inO@SOPfis.net>
01 ugUS12005 16:28
Sny Br Park support
,
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject
HI Fr.mk.
Thank you for agr,eing 10 wrile in BUpport of the Snyder Park balllloom' balBment incluBlon to the UD. "you
could cui and pa~ lhe folloWing intD a new emall and send it baCk to me thet would be greatl
;
I, Frank McDonald, live a and am a neighbor to S yder Park. I wholehearted support
the 1- bedroom ..idents I Snyder Park in the ability to lIt-oultheir unnn heel basements to include baIhroom.
I understand that~ar1clng i an issue In the neighborhood. but I do not bel eve that Snyder Park Is only culprit
'TlI8 residents 01 nyder P rk have proven to be good neighl>)ra end I 1m they win continue to be nsidersle
and respeclfullo , e enti neiglllloltlood.
i
I am sorry thai I Bin unalll lo alIend the Aug. 2 Planning ana Zoning me . g and want my support I r the Snyder
PlIrk PUD Amen~menl h rd and noted for the record.
lbank you.
Frank MoDonald .
Thanks Frank' '
Slrah Broughton!
rowIand.brougllton
__ IndurlJln\lvSi9"
100 e. mope' 8VII. '3
..,.n,OO ,'8t1 .
_ I1Q.37t1.olt 1 ;
..~4-M7S ;
""""""'...b...."...\-
02108/2005
---
July 14,2005
To Whom It May Concern:
My wife Ruth and I are not in favor of approving basement apartments in the
Snyder property. We are residents of the Ardmore subdivision adjacent to
the Snyder property.
When the project was originally conceived, many of us Ardmore
homeowners attended the design meetings not to try to stop the project, but
to help it become a quality addition to the inventory of Affordable Housing
in Aspen. Our business, The Ute Mountaineer has experienced a huge
benefit from this program over the last decade. We feel that our commitment
oftime and energy helped the Snyder property become the extraordinary
value that it is for the homeowners there today.
We oppose the expansion of the capacity there for two reasons. First, we felt
that the project got our neighborhood's support in the form that it took; it is
unfair to come back to the Aspen community forgetting the process that took
place. We discussed and rejected the higher density options back then. The
residents already enjoy what we view as the best value of all the affordable
housing projects in the Aspen area at present. Second, higher density makes
even less sense now given the growth that this end of town has seen since
Snyder was built up. The parking along Midland Avenue is a graphic
reminder that we are hitting the limit for cars and people in this area of town.
Thank you for your consideration,
~ ~ k~W~dZ
Bob & Ruth Wade
July 14,2005
To Whom It May Concern:
My wife Ruth and I are not in favor of approving basement apartments in the
Snyder property. We are residents of the Ardmore subdivision adjacent to
the Snyder property.
When the project was originally conceived, many of us Ardmore
homeowners attended the design meetings not to try to stop the project, but
to help it become a quality addition to the inventory of Affordable Housing
in Aspen. Our business, The Ute Mountaineer has experienced a huge
benefit from this program over the last decade. We feel that our commitment
of time and energy helped the Snyder property become the extraordinary
value that it is for the homeowners there today.
We oppose the expansion of the capacity there for two reasons. First, we felt
that the project got our neighborhood's support in the form that it took; it is
unfair to come back to the Aspen community forgetting the process that took
place. We discussed and rejected the higher density options back then. The
residents already enjoy what we view as the best value of all the affordable
housing projects in the Aspen area at present. Second, higher density makes
even less sense now given the growth that this end of town has seen since
Snyder was built up. The parking along Midland Avenue is a graphic
reminder that we are hitting the limit for cars and people in this area of town.
Thank you for your consideration,
~~k~uJ~
Bob & Ruth Wade
July 14,2005
To Whom It May Concern:
My wife Ruth and I are not in favor of approving basement apartments in the
Snyder property. We are residents of the Ardmore subdivision adjacent to
the Snyder property.
When the project was originally conceived, many of us Ardmore
homeowners attended the design meetings not to try to stop the project, but
to help it become a quality addition to the inventory of Affordable Housing
in Aspen. Our business, The Ute Mountaineer has experienced a huge
benefit from this program over the last decade. We feel that our commitment
of time and energy helped the Snyder property become the extraordinary
value that it is for the homeowners there today.
We oppose the expansion of the capacity there for two reasons. First, we felt
that the project got our neighborhood's support in the form that it took; it is
unfair to come back to the Aspen community forgetting the process that took
place. We discussed and rejected the higher density options back then. The
residents already enjoy what we view as the best value of all the affordable
housing projects in the Aspen area at present. Second, higher density makes
even less sense now given the growth that this end of town has seen since
Snyder was built up. The parking along Midland Avenue is a graphic
reminder that we are hitting the limit for cars and people in this area of town.
Thank you for your consideration,
~ ~ k~ w~dSz..
Bob & Ruth Wade
"
Page I of I
X-Sender: johnw@commons
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 200511:21:13 -0600
To: James Lindt <jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us>
From: John Worcester <johnw@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Re: Snyder Condition of Approval
X-MailS canner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MaiIScanner: Found to be clean
I would not like a condition that limited the number of cars a person could own, but would not be
opposed to a condition that limited the number of cars an owner could park at the project. Or, a
requirement that at least one car be parked in the owner's parking garage (ifthere are parking garages).
At 08:44 AM 8/1/2005 -0600, you wrote:
Hi John,
P & Z is reviewing a PUD amendment request to finish the basement spaces out at the Snyder Park AH
units. The HOA wanted the ability to include additional bedrooms in these finished basement spaces.
P & Z contemplated allowing for the additional bedrooms with a condition that each unit owner only
have the ability to own one car because there are parking problems in the area. We told the
Commission that a condition of this nature was not a good idea and that we thought the attorney's
office would not be comfortable with a condition limiting the number of cars that someone owns.
Instead, the Commission is leaning towards allowing the HOA to finish the basements without adding
bedrooms.
Is it an accurate representation on our part that you would not support a condition limiting the number
of vehicles someone could own?
Thanks,
James
file:/ /C: \DOCUME-l ~amesl\LOCALS-1 \ T emp\eud2F .htm
8/1/2005
~ ,
-
-..;
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission
Joyce Allgaier, Community Development Deputy Director
James Lindt, Senior Planner
Snyder Park Affordable Housing Project PUD Amendment,
Resolution No. _, Series of 2005- Public Hearine. Continued from
7/5
July 19, 2005
DATE:
REQUEST:
The Applicant is reqnesting a PUD amendment to the Snyder Park
Affordable Honsing PUD to allow for the nnfinished basements on the
one-bedroom nnits to be finished with a variety of room uses, inclnding
bedrooms and bathrooms.
ZONING:
AH/PUD (Affordable Housing/PUD)
LAND USE
REQUESTS:
The Applicant is requesting approval of a PUD amendment to the
Snyder Park Affordable Honsing PUD pnrsnant to the procednres
established in Land Use Code Section 26.445.100(B), Amendment of
PUD develo ment order.
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval with conditions.
LAND USE ACTIONS REQUESTED:
The Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall be the recommending body to City Council
after considering a recommendation from the Community Development Director
pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100, Amendment of PUD Development Order.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST AND BACKGROUND:
The Applicant, Snyder Park Homeowner's Association, is requesting a PUD amendment
to amend the PUD that was approved pursuant to Ordinance No. 24, Series of 1998
(attached as Exhibit "D"). Snyder Park consists of fifteen (15) units in total; six 3-
bedroom units and nine I-bedroom units.
The Applicant would like to amend the PUD to allow for the unfinished basements in
eight (8) of the nine I-bedroom units to be finished with a variety ofroom uses, including
bedrooms and bathrooms. The ninth I-bedroom unit is not proposed for expansion
because it is currently slab on grade construction. Originally, these units were approved
to be built as slab-on-grade construction with no crawl spaces or basements. However,
when the units came in for building permit, a crawl space was required to be constructed
- I -
,.,
capital improvements pursuant to the Affordable Housing Guidelines. Other
conditions included in the proposed resolution limit the number of bedrooms that
are to be installed in the basement of each unit to one additional bedroom and
disallow the installation of a cooking device in the basements, thereby keeping the
finished basement from becoming separate, additional dwelling units.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the attached
resolution, recommending that City Council approve the proposed PUD amendment with
the conditions contained therein.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"1 move to approve Resolution No. _' Series of 2005, recommending that City Council
approve with conditions, the requested PUD amendment to allow for the eight (8) 1-
bedroom affordable housing units (ADA I-bedroom unit not included) in the Snyder Park
Affordable Housing PUD to finish their basements to include additional bedrooms."
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT A - REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS
EXHIBIT B - ApPLICATION
EXHIBIT C - REFERRAL COMMENTS
EXHIBIT D - ORDINANCE No. 24, SERIES OF 1998
EXHIBIT E - LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC
- 3 -
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
Section I:
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends that City Council approve a
PUD amendment to the Snyder Park PUD allowing for the unfinished basements in the
eight (8) I-bedroom units (not including the ADA accessible I-bedroom unit because it does
not have an unfInished basement) to be finished, and to allow for each of the finished
basements to contain one bedroom, with the following conditions:
I. A building permit shall be applied for and approved to finish each of the
individual basements. As part of the building permit application for each
individual basement, the owner shall demonstrate compliance with the
minimum unit size as set forth in the Affordable Housing Guidelines for
the proposed unit type (i.e. 2-bedroom unit). The finished basements shall
meet the applicable building code requirements that are in place at the
time of building permit submittal.
2. The basements shall not contain cooking devices, thereby reinforcing that
the finished basements are not to be used as an additional, stand~alone
dwelling unit.
3. The owners of the subject units that finish their basements shall not be
allowed to be reimbursed for more than 10% of the actual costs of capital
improvements to the units upon the initial sale of the improved units
pursuant to the affordable housing guidelines.
4. The units subject to this amendment shall be resold as one-bedroom units
even though they may contain two bedrooms after the basements are
finished.
5. The bedrooms to be added in the basements shall not be rented out. The
Applicant shall record an amended deed restriction in conjunction with
obtaining a building permit to finish each of the individual basements that
describes said prohibition on renting the bedrooms.
6. Any bedrooms to be added to the basements shall be located such that
there is direct access from the bedrooms to the existing egress wells in
order to meet the egress requirements of the building code without altering
the exterior of the structures.
Section 2:
All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or
EXHIBIT A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT
Review Criteria & Staff Findings
In accordance with Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, the Applicants have requested
a PUD Amendment.
Section 26.445.050, Review Standards: PUD Amendment
Section 26.445 of the Regulations provides that development applications for a PUD
amendment must comply with the following standards and requirements.
A. General Requirements.
/. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Area
Community Plan.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with the affordable housing
goals of the AACP. Staff feels that the amendment will allow for the homeowner's at
Snyder Park to have the flexibility to occupy their units for the long-term and allow for
the units to change with their different life stages allowing them to be vested members of
the community as is encouraged by the Housing section of the AACP. Staff finds this
criterion to be met.
2. The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing
land uses in the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment is consistent with character of the existing
land uses in the immediate area. The proposed amendment will not change the exterior
aesthetics of the units in that unfinished basements already exist with the necessary
egress. Moreover, the units will continue to be family-oriented affordable housing units.
Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. The proposed development shall not adversely affect the future development
of the surrounding area.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will adversely affect the future
development of the surrounding area in any manner. Thus, Staff finds this criterion not
to be applicable to this application.
4. The proposed development has either been granted GMQS allotments, is
exempt from GMQS, or GMQS allotments are available to accommodate the
proposed development and will be considered prior to, or in combination with, .final
pun development plan review.
- 4 -
d) The proximity of the proposed development to the commercial core and
general activity centers in the city.
Staff Finding
As was discussed in the staff memo, Staff feels that many of the bedrooms that would be
added to the basements of these units will be occupied by people that already live within
the development. Staff is further of the opinion that the close proximity of this
development to town and to an in-city bus route encourages limited parking demand for
the inhabitants of the additional bedrooms that would be provided by this amendment. In
addition, Staff has proposed a condition of approval in the resolution requiring that the
new bedrooms in the basements not be allowed to be rented out by the owners. Staff
finds this criterion to be met.
4. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there
exists insufficient infrastructure capabilities. Specifically, the maximum
density of a PUD may be reduced if:
a) There is not sufficient water pressure, drainage capabilities, or other
utilities to service the proposed development.
b) There are not adequate roads to ensure fire protection, snow removal,
and road maintenance to the proposed development.
Staff Finding
Staff has consulted the applicable utility agencies, who have expressed that the adequate
infrastructure exists to accommodate the proposed amendments. Staff finds this criterion
to be met.
5. The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be reduced if there
exists natural hazards or critical natural site features. Specifically, the
maximum density of a PUD may be reduced if:
a) The land is not suitable for the proposed development because of ground
instability or the possibility of mudflow, rock falls or avalanche dangers.
b) The effects of the proposed development are detrimental to the natural
watershed, due to runoff, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent water
pollution.
c) The proposed development will have a pernicious effect on air quality in
the surrounding area and the City.
d) The design and location of any proposed structure, road, driveway, or
trail in the proposed development is not compatible with the terrain or
causes harmful disturbance to critical naturalfeatures of the site.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment does not alter the permitted density of units approved in the
original PUD. Additionally, the proposed amendment involves finishing livable
space that is already incorporated within the subject buildings. Therefore, finishing
the basements with bedrooms and other uses will not have an impact on site drainage,
soil erosion or consequential water pollution. The Applicant also is not requesting to
- 6 -
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact the existing siting of structures on the parcel
and will affect the extent to which the units are visually interesting. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
4. Buildings and access ways are appropriately arranged to allow emergency
and service vehicle access.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not impact the emergency and service
vehicle access that was approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
5. Adequate pedestrian and handicapped access is provided.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not impact the pedestrian and
handicapped access that was approved in the original PUD. Staff finds this criterion not
to be applicable to this application.
6. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in a practical
and reasonable manner and shall not negatively impact surrounding
properties.
Staff Finding
The proposed amendment will not impact the site drainage since the amendment will
only impact interior space that is already built. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
7. For non-residential land uses, spaces between buildings are appropriately
de-signed to accommodate any programmatic functions associated with the
use.
Staff Finding
There are no non-residential land uses proposed as part of this amendment and no non-
residential uses exist within the subject development. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
C. Landscape Plan:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure compatibility of the proposed
landscape with the visual character of the city, with surrounding parcels, and
with existing and proposed features of the subject property. The proposed
development shall comply with the following:
- 8-
2. Incorporate, to the extent practical, natural heating and cooling by taking
advantage of the property's solar access, shade, and vegetation and by use
of non- or less-intensive mechanical systems.
Staff Finding
Staff believes that the proposed amendment will not alter the extent to which the units
incorporate natural heating and cooling systems. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
3. Accommodate the storage and shielding of snow, ice, and water in a safe an
appropriate manner that does not require significant maintenance.
Staff Finding
Staff does not believe that the proposed amendment will impact the ability at which the
development accommodates the shielding of snow, ice, and water in that the proposed
amendment simply requests to finish interior space that already exists. Staff finds this
criterion not to be applicable to this application.
E. Lighting:
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the exterior of the development will be
lighted in an appropriate manner considering both public safety and general
aesthetic concerns. The following standards shall be accomplished:
I. All lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous
interference of any king to adjoining streets or lands. Lighting of site
features, structures, and access ways is proposed in an appropriate manner.
Staff Finding
The original PUD requires that all exterior lighting meet the lighting code requirements
of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. The proposed amendment will not impact the
development's compliance with the lighting code. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
2. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting
Standards unless otherwise approved and noted in the final PUD
documents. Up-lighting of site features, buildings, landscape elements, and
lighting to call inordinate attention to the property is prohibited for
residential development.
Staff Finding
The original PUD requires that all exterior lighting meet the lighting code requirements
of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. The proposed amendment will not impact the
development's compliance with the lighting code. Staff finds this criterion not to be
applicable to this application.
G. Common Park, Open Space, or Recreation Area:
If the proposed development includes a common park, open space, or
recreation area for the mutual benefit of all development in the proposed PUD,
the following criteria shall be met:
- 10-
Staff Finding
The affected utility agencies have reviewed the proposed plans and did not express any
public infrastructure concerns. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
3. Oversized utilities, public facilities, or site improvements are provided
appropriately and where the developer is reimbursed proportionately for the
additional improvement.
Staff Finding
The Applicants are not proposing to install oversized utilities or public facilities and it is
not anticipated that the Applicants will be required by the City to provide oversized
utilities. This amendment will not impact the size of utilities or public facilities that are
needed to accommodate the development. Staff does not find this criterion to be
applicable to this application.
L Access and Circulation (Only standards I & 2 apply to Minor PUD
applications):
The purpose of this standard is to ensure the development is easily accessible,
does not unduly burden the surrounding road network, provides adequate
pedestrian and recreational trail facilities and minimizes the use of security
gates. The proposed access and circulation of the development shall meet the
following criteria:
1. Each lot, structure, or other land use within the PUD has adequate access
to a public street either directly or through and approved private road, a
pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use.
Staff Finding
This amendment does not impact the development's compliance with this requirement.
Provisions were made in the original PUD approval to insure the adequate access is
provided to the development. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this
application.
2. The proposed development, vehicular access points, and parking
arrangement do not create traffic congestion on the roads surrounding the
proposed development, or such surrounding roads are proposed to be
improved to accommodate the development.
- 12 -
0-Z- r(2-
Heidi H. Hoffmann AlA
H3 Architects
504 Midland Pk. PI.
Aspen, CO 81611
970 925 9420
hhharch@rof.net
/\
August 2, 2005
City of Aspen P&Z
C/O James Lindt
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Snyder Park PUD Amendment
To Whom It May Concern;
I would like to extend my support to the homeowners at Snyder Park to amend the existing PUD to
allow the finishing off of their basements to include uses other than bedroom use. As a neighbor
and associate architect on the project, this amendment should not impact the intent of the affordable
housing program to provide for one-bedroom housing nor automobile parking on Midland Avenue.
That being said, I would encourage the Snyder Park homeowners to strictly monitor their own
parking situation and be responsive to their neighbor's parking and driving concerns. The issue of
current parking spots not being used for their intended use needs to be addressed by the
homeowners themselves.
Thank you for the opportunity to support the passage of this PUD amendment.
Very truly yours,
Heidi H. Hoffmann AlA
/
I
/ -
ATTACHMENT 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ~~d~d~ ~~~~ ~::i~;;1~1 fU 0
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ~ I:=j I urx:J/ W'<.( WAJ{U.200_
-Iv JUt.., /'1/ UVS
STATEOFCOWRADO )
) ...
Couoty of Pitkio )
I, Sa VC{ VI Bvw j ~-fu n (name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
V Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
./~ paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
"i Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
F-- Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed ofletters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (l ~ days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 11 day of
I)7;YlL ,200:5 , to and including the date and time of the public
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
L Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.06O(EX2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government,
school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that
owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next poge)
~'\
I
/"'"",
Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in
any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision
of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such
revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use
regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other
sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and
addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall
be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public
inspection in the plarming agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing on such amendments.
~.~
Signature
The fOreg~ "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this I q day
of-:lLL. ,20OS:;-by _'n m ~h~?~~A/
WIlNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
ATTACHMENTS:
COPYOFmEPUBUCATlON
PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BY MAIL
Jam and Smudge Free Printing
UseAvery@TEMPLATES160@
121 ROBINSON ROAD LLC
600 E HOPKINS AVE #205
ASPEN. CO 81611
-
ASPEN ELF
4301 ARCADY
DALLAS, TX 75205
BENNETT NEIL J
PO BOX 9937
ASPEN, CO 81612
BYRNES JAMES ROBERT & VALERIE P
90 CLAY LN
ASPEN, CO 81611
CORBIN MARCIA A
PO BOX 9312
ASPEN, CO 81612
--.JNOHO LARRY 0 & CAROL A
19105 HOLBERTON LN
BROOKVILLE, MD 20833
FISH EILEEN M 1/3 INT
6482 CHERRY CT
NIWOT. CO 80503
HACH STEPHEN C
23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD
ASPEN, CO 81611
HARRIS NORMAN LINDSAY JR
146 ARDMORE DR
ASPEN. CO 81611
~MING GREGG S
'I.....JlOX 622
~EN. CO 81612
@09~S @AUaAV ~
-
www.avery.co..-
1-800-GO-AVE,
, "',
-
ADAIR ARJA P JR
5375 S GENEVA WY
ENGLEWOOD. CO 80111
BANNEROT KARIN SOFIA
43A SMUGGLER GROVE RD
ASPEN, CO 81611
BEYER ALAN R
410 N MILL ST #B11
ASPEN. CO 81611
CITY OF ASPEN
130 S GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
COSTLEY JAMES J
PO BOX 884
ASPEN. CO 81612
ELA CHARLES S
1208 E HOPKINS
ASPEN. CO 81611
GROSZ COLLEEN A TRUST
155 N HARBOR DR #3612
CHICAGO, IL 60601
HALPERIN ALEXANDRA
PO BOX2210
ASPEN, CO 81612
HARRISON MARK N 2/3 INT
6482 CHERRY CT
NIWOT, CO 80503
HEYMAN BRUCE ALAN & VICKI S
C/O GOLDMANSACHS & CO
2035 N MAGNOLIA
CHICAGO,IL 60614
A1I3^,lf-09-o0B-~
WOJ.,t,aAe'MMM
-
-
~ AVERY@ S160illl
AMES MARTHA E
23 SMUGGLER GROVE RD
ASPEN, CO 81611
BEIDLEMAN NEAL J & AMY G
PO BOX 4362
ASPEN. CO 81612
BROWN RUTH H
410NMILLST#B11
ASPEN, CO 81611
CONANT RICHARD H
55 SMUGGLER GROVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
DEJEAN FELIX A III & CAROL YNE
1368 KATHERINE DR
OPELOUSAS. LA 70570
ELLIOTT ELYSE
610 W NORTH ST
ASPEN,CO 81611
GULL EVAN H REV TRUST
25 ARDMORE CT
ASPEN. CO 81611
HARRIS GEORGE WALTER III
PO BOX 11005
ASPEN. CO 81612
HEJDUK MILAN
C/O JIRI CRHA
16390 BRAEBURN RIDGE TRAIL
DELRAY BEACH. FL 33446
HYDER GENE MICHAEL
320 MIDLAND AVE
ASPEN. CO 81611
, @09~S ~!JeqI!6 al zilSlII~n
ap!dl!J a61!'lJ\ls ~ ~a a6I!JJnoq!~ul! uo!ssa.ldWI
Jam and Smudge Free Printing
Use AvenP TEMPLATE 5160@
KAL TENBOCK ERNST
1612 WOODBINE HEIGHTS BLVD
TORONTO ONTARIO CANADA. M4B
3A4
''"*''
MACALPINE GORDON A
PO BOX 5043
ASPEN, CO 81612
PEARL JILL
1207 E HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
RODBELL PHYLLIS
1101 CREST VALLEY DR
ATLANTA. GA 30327
SADOWSKY DANIEL
PO BOX 2210
ASPEN, CO 81612
AON FAMILY QPRT
""CIo CHARLES SIMON
1800 NE 114TH ST PH3
NORTH MIAMI. FL 33181
WANG EDWARD 0 30%
1406 MAIN ST
EVANSTON,IL 60201
,""'~'
-
@09~S @AU3I\V ~
-
www.avery.co.-
1-800-GO-AVE
, "
-
KNUTSON RODNEY 0
PO BOX YY
ASPEN. CO 81612
MCPHERSON GREGORY J
PO BOX 2073
ASPEN, CO 81612
RASTEGAR All REZA
8403 WESTGLEN DR STE 100
HOUSTON, TX 77063
RODELL TIMOTHY C & MARJORIE M
PO BOX 8005
ASPEN. CO 81612-8005
SEGUIN MIKE A
PO BOX 1914
ASPEN. CO 81612
SNELL NANCY L
PO BOX YY
ASPEN. CO 81612
WANG KARINA
1319 CRAIN STREET
EVANSTON.IL 60202
A1l3^V.09-OOS-~
WO)'AlaAe'MMM
-
-
~ AVERY@ 5160@
LEBBY NICK & SARA
PO BOX 1352
ASPEN, CO 81612
MILLER DAWN & STEPHEN H
3401 N MOORINGS WAY
COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133
ROBINSON JACK A & AVIVA
1589 KIRKWAY
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302
ROSE JAMES JAY
PO BOX 2096
ASPEN. CO 81612
SHECHTER IRVING
TRUSTEE OF SHECHTER TRUST
1794 WINTERWARM RD
FALLBROOK, CA 92028
SPECTOR LORRAINE STAVE TRST
SPECTOR LORRAINE & PAT TRSTE
3 FAIR OAKS
LADUE. MO 63124
WHRJ3 LLC
32205 BINGHAM RD
BINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025
. e09~S ~!Jeqe6 81 zas!ll~n
8p!deJ 86elp~s Ii' ~8 86eJJnoq!lue UO!SS8.ldWI
/""'.
,-,
,.......
........
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: SNYDER PARK PUD AMENDMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, July 5, 2005 at a
meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities
Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Snyder Park
Homeowner's Association, 210 Midland Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611, requesting approval of a
PUD amendment to the approved Snyder Park Affordable Honsing PUD to allow for the nine 1-
bedroom units to finish their unfinished basements. As part of the request to finish the unfinished
basements, the application proposes to allow for additional bedrooms to be added to these units.
The properties subject to the application are legally described as the Snyder Park
Subdivision/PUD. For further information, contact James Lindt at the City of Aspen Community
Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2763,jamesl@ci.aspen.co.us.
slJasmine Tv2l'e
Chair, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on June 19,2005
City of Aspen Account
ATTACHMENT 7
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 2.6.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ....511 vd t2 [/' jJ(A [-1k
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING D:TE: 7/.-;hs
, Aspen, CO
,200
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
County of Pitkin )
I, ',,",-)./'A VVitP--S. -/;-. i IVJr/J/ (name, please print)
being or representing an App icant to the CIty of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certifY that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
l Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section ofan official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fift.een (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached'hereto.
"
_ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable,
waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide
and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed ofletters not
less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days
prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the _ day of
, 200_, to and including the date and time of the public
hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. \
_ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Comm~ity
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid u.s. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government,
school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that
owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the
development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be
those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than
sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and
governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
,.....,
",,;
o
ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION
~PLICANT:
Location:
Name:
Parcel ID #
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name:
Address:
Phone #:
PROJEcr:
1"_ ~Ift,~~ ~ Aw1.iM-I1Vl1~
Address: 2-1 ~I ve-
Phone #:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
~..'
D Conditional Use D Conceptual PUD D Conceptua1 Historic Devt.
D Special Review ;g Final PUD @: pun Amendment)f D Final Historic Development
D Design Review Appea1 D Conceptual SPA D Minor Historic Devt
D GMQS Allotment D Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) D Historic Demolition
D GMQS Exemption D Subdivision D Historic Designation
D ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream D Subdivision Exemption (includes D Small Lodge Conversion!
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion
Mountain View Plane
D Lot Split D Temporary Use D Other:
D Lot Line Adjustment D TextIMap Amendment
PUP ~ab& HdVSf~ d~~
t!) fI-.tL-
() ~ S I in c/ I/cIAi:;
~h~
~b~
Ha e you attached the following?
Pre-Application Conference Summary
Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
espouse to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form
Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
f\Il plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of aU written
text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application.
-
-
~
".~
/
,
-
,..)
rowland+broughton
architecture and urban design
27 April 2005
City of Aspen Community Development
City of Aspen Housing Department
Re: Snyder Park PUD Amendment
Dear Sirs and Madams,
Rowland + Broughton Architecture and Urban Design is representing the homeowner's at Snyder
Park Affordable Housing Planned Unit Development in seeking a PUD Amendment.
Snyder Park Affordable Housing PUD was approved in 1998. It has since been built with (15)
affordable housing units, (6) three-bedroom units and (9) one-bedroom units. The one-bedroom
units were all built with unfinished basements and window wells for egress. The plans originally
called for slab on grade construction; however basements were added closer to construction.
The owners of the one-bedroom units are interested in being able to fit-out their unfinished
basements into a variety of uses. These uses include: home offices, playrooms, storage, bedrooms
and bathrooms. Under the current approved PUD, additional bedrooms and bathrooms are not
allowed.
This application is asking for a PUD Amendment to allow the homeowners at Snyder Park the option
to convert existing, unfinished basement space into a variety of different uses, including the possibility
of a bedroom and bathroom.
The review standards relevant to this application are the land use code for Planned Unit Development,
Chapter 26.445. Specifically for our PUD Amendment, the following items apply:
26.445.050.A. 1- The proposed development shall be consistent with the Aspen Ama Community Plan.
Allowing for an additional bedroom and bathroom to be developed in the unfinished basements at
Snyder Park directly relates to the goal of Aspen's affordable housing program to build community.
Our community is based on a healthy mix of people, who can call Aspen home. Flexibility is a key
component in creating the mix of people. Young people move to Aspen, often find a partner and
possibly start a family. Our housing needs to allow for the flexibility of life and encourage roots to be
established.
26.445.050.A.2- The proposed development shall be consistent with the character of existing land
uses in the surrounding ama.
The east side of town is residential and is going through a major redevelopment. As house prices
soar, more locals are forced out of the City. By allowing for an additional bedroom and bathroom to
be developed in the unfinished basements, homeowners at Snyder Park will have more options to
remain in residency in the City. The option to develop the unfinished basements gives the
homeowner the ability to add value to their property all within the Housing Department's guidelines.
1 of 2.
~~ :;-:":;;;.
;~. '::- ....,
~:I'~
~"'-
~",o
<,,0
:,,""-<1(1)
a!2:~
~.. 0
-~o
...."
a2l~
th
~.. m
Ottl ~
c_..
<c"..
,,--
o~~
~- -
o a. AI
0.. '"
3~"
< ..
-.:. ~:)
0" "
=00
gCD~
@o",
a~::
!. (.n 'c.
~ "."-
aZ;co
0"0 "
~",o
o. Os
c",..
<co..
"",.
_. '"
0-0
~"'o
o-...,t(J)
0"'.
3,"
;:;'"
0"
",p
.",
"'..
0..
",.
.",
-..
"'"
~'"
-.
/......
,-_,,f
f'
'...
Snyder Park PUD Amendment Application
26.445.050.8.6- The maximum allowable density within a PUD may be increased if there exists a
significant community goal to be achieved through such increase and the development pattem is
compatible with its surrounding development pattems and with the site's physical constraints.
Specifically, the maximum density of a PUD may be increased if:
a) The increase in density serves one or more goals of the community as expressed in the Aspen
Area Community Plan.
b) The site's physical capabilities can accommodate additional density and there exists no
negative physical characteristics of the site
c) The increase in maximum density results in a development pattem compatible with, and
complimentary to, the surrounding existing and expected development pattem, land uses and
characteristics.
This PUD Amendment meets all of the conditions mentioned above.
Through many conversations with both the City of Aspen Housing Board and City of Aspen
Community Development, we strongly believe that by adopting a PUD Amendment to allow for the
development of the unfinished basements at Snyder Park takes us further to the goal of flexible,
diverse and balanced affordable housing.
We welcome any conversation or questions regarding this application.
~
Sarah Broughton, AlA
Cc: Snyder Park Homeowners
20fZ
Apr 07 04 09:31a
Dr'l," G1 ick
1-970-920-380U
p.l
.
.
.
,
SNYDER PARK CONDOMINIUMS
RULES AND REGULATIONS
pun;uant to the condominium Declaration and ByI8W& of the Snyder Park Condoniniums. ("AssOdation" or
'compleX" herein),lhe Exec;Ulive Board ("Boanli haS adOp\ed the foUoWing Rules and Regulations to govem
theu58 and enjoyment of the S~er Park Condominiums. "Complex" also refels lD. condorniniJm unlls plll&
the general and limiled common e\emenls. The Board desires to ensure the higheSt postIbIe standardS of
li\Iing experience within the compl811. In order to accomplish this. the Board reques\ll the cooperation of ell
pelSOOS residinll in or IIisitinlIthe compl811 in the obseMlncB of the following:
1. ~.
I. Permitted. Dogs and cats are permitted on the premises. subject to the
provisions contained herein. No other pets of any nature wbatsoeV<< shall be allowed on the
premises. in a unit or on the complex without prior written approval from the Association.
The Association sball have the authority to preclude any other pelS within the complel<, or to
approve any other pets, subject to any conditions the Association detennines.
2. MandatolV p.eviewlRillht to Amend. As soon as is practicable after three (3)
months from the date of closing of the sale of the first Snyder Park Condominium unit from
the Aspen1Pitkin County Housing Authority to a purchaser, the Exeeutive Board of the
Association shall meet to review the policies and procedures regarding pets set forth herein.
The Association shall have the right at that time and any time thereafter, to amend or modify
these rules and/or procedures regarding pets, including the right to prohibit any and/or aU pets
within the complex or the units at any time, provided, howl:Yer. that in the event the
Association elects to prohibit pelS at any time, such prohibition shall apply only prospectivelY,
to new owners and/or new pets for existing owners. In no event shall an existing pet owner
who is not in violation of any of the provisions of these Rules and Regulations regarding pelS
be required to remove a pet from the complex when any such rule is enac;t<'<I.
3. p.p_'ltriction on Pets. All pets shall be under strict voice control or on a leash
at all times that they are on the complex. No pets shall be allowed to run at Iarge on the
"COmplex, nor shall any pets be tied to or confined on any general or limited common element
of the complex at any time. including decks and patios. No pets sball be allowed outdoon at
night, unless accompanied by the owner and under strict voice control or on a leash. No pets
shall create a nuisance or disturb the peace of the complex or other owners. including without
limitation, any loud or excessive barking; any destrUction to iandsaq)ing or other common
elementS on the complex; any commotion, disturbance or littering of trash receptacles or
dumpsters on the complex; and the like. Owners sball be responsible to pick up their own
pet's excrement.
4. Violations. In the event of any violation of these provisions, any owner or
the Association may file a complaint with the Executive Board. Upon receipt of any
complaint of a violation, the Executive Board shall schedule a bearing as soon as practicable
to hear the complaint and give the owner of the offending pet the opportunity to rebut the
....'
......................_....~ ApiI6._
Apr 07 04 09:3la
D,'1!, Glick
l-970-920-311UU
p."
.
complaint. After hearing the evidence and arguments presented, the Executive Board shall
determine whether a violation bas occurred. The Executive Board's decision in the matter
shall be final and not appealable. In the event the Board determines a violation bas 0CQUTed,
it shall have the authority to impose a fine or any other enforcement it determines appropriate,
except in the case of pets running free within the complex, tied up or confined to a conunon
element, or causing a disturbance or nuisance with loud or excessive barking. In eaclt of these
cases, the fine for each offense sball be fifty doUars ($50.00), for the first two offenses. AU
fines shall be treated as assessments and the Association shall have the authority to impose an
assessment lien for any unpaid fines hereunder. In the event any pet is the subject of any three
valid complaints (i&, complaints the Executive Board has ruled valid), the offending pet shaD
immediately be evicted from the Snyder puk Condominiums. Until the date the pet physically
leaves the premises, the owner sha1I be tined one hundred donars (5 I 00.(0) per day for each
day after the effective date of the Board's decision until the pet is no longer on the premises.
Thereafter, the offending pet's owner shall be thereafter precluded from owning any other
pets on the premises without prior approval of the Association. In addition, the Association
reserves the right to turn off the utilities to the unit of an owner whose pet is in violation and
who has not paid the appropriate fine, ceased the objectionable behavior or removed his pet
from the premises_
.
2. Parking & Vehicle Maintenance. Only operable and currently licensed
automobiles, trucks, vans and motorcycles, not exceeding one ton in size, shall be kept or maintained
on the Conunon Elements- No vehicle maintenance or repair shall be canied out at any Unit or on the
Common Elements. No motor homes, boats, snowmobiles or similar recreational vehicles and no
trailers shall be parked within the Project. Parking spaces shall be maintained as parking spaces and
not used for any other purpose. Parking of pennitted vehicles shall be limited and restricted to
designated parking areas for Owners and guests. The Association sball have tbe right to preclude any
vehicle or motorcycle that makes excessive noise, in the Executive Board's determination, from
parking on the conunon elements. Owners shall not lease their parking space to any individua1 ~
with prior Association approval, a unit owner may lease his parking space to anotherunit owner in the
Snyder Park Condominiums, for that unit owner's personal use. Any owner, guest or tenant parking
in unauthorized spaces may be towed, booted and/or fined, in the Association's discretion. Any fine
shall not be less than one hundred dollars ($100.00) per occurrence. Any violation of the prohibition
against leasing set forth above shall be subject to a fine equal to one hundred dollars ($100.00) per
each day of violation and the Association may enforce this fine by assessment lien foreclosure.
3. lls. The complex shaI1 be used solely for residentiaI purposes and for services.
activities, and recreation in conjunction with said residentiaI use. No business or conunercial use of
any nature may be conducted within a unit or on the complex, except for home occupations as defined
by the Aspen Municipal Code, as amended, and as approved by the Association.
4 _ Insurance. Nothing may be done or stored within the complex that might result in
an increase in the premiums for insurance obtained for any portion of the complex or which might
caulMl canceUation of such insurance.
,..,
Rula and Rcp,WIiOlWo [or Snyder PaIk CondominRns Apn16. 2004
.
Apr 07 04 09:3la
Dan Glick
l-:::J/U-"CU-~OUU
...~
. 5. V"\Olation~Tbe Law. Nothing shall be done withintbe compIex that wou1d be
in violation of any statute, rule, ordinance, regulation, permit, covenant or other validly ilnposed
requirement of any governmental body, including the zoning, subdivision or building restrictions of
the City of Aspen.
6. Garllall.e I Trash. All garbageJtrash shall be placed in sealed garbage cans and
stored in the unit or a dumpster or dumpsters provided by the Association until garbage/traSh pick up
day. Trash, debris, and/or garbage left in the common areas may be removed by the Association and
the Association shall impose a fine in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) per occurrence, assessed
against the unit responsible for such trash.
7. Decks & Patios: Common Elemc!'!ts. Tbe following are allowed to be stored on decks
and patios, designated as Limited Common Elements, provided they are stored in a neat and orderly
manner:
1. Patio furniture in good condition and in an amount appropriate to the space.
2. One (1) gas cooking grill, in good working order, and not a fire hazard.
.
In all cases, the Board of Directors will be the tinal judge as to the condition of the common areas, in
order to ensure a pleasing appearance to the entire complex. No unit owner shall obstruct, damage or
commit waste to any oCthe common elements. Except as provided herein, no unit owner shall
change, alter, repair or store anything in or on any ofthe common elements witbout the prior written
consent of the Association.
8. Antenna. No antenna of any sort shall be placed, allowed, or maintained on any
portion of the general or limited common elements without the prior approval of the Association,
which may be withheld in the sole discretion of the Association.
9. Personal Propertv. Any personal propeny left in the general or IiD1ited common
elements may be presumed abandoned and will be disposed ofby the Association at no liability to the
Association. The Association shall not be responsible for any loss, due to theft, damage or otherwise.
to any personal property stored or otherwise left on any COIRIIlOn element, whether allowed or
prohibited by the Rules and Regulations.
10. No Noxious. Offensive. Hazardous or Annoving Activities. No noxious or offensive
activity shall be carried on upon any part of the project nor shall anything be done or placed on or in
part of the project which is or may become a nuisance or cause embarrassJDelll, disturbance or
annoyance to others. No activity shall be conducted on any part of the project and no ilnprovements
sball be made or constructed on any part of the project which are or might be unsafe or hazardous to
any person or property. No sound shall be emitted on any part of the project which is unreasonably
loud or annoying. No odor shall be emitted on any part of the project which is noxious or offensive
to others. No light shall be emitted from any part of the project which is unreasonably bright or
causes unreasonable glare.
....'
RWe5andRqpIIItiOl\Sfor~Puk~ Apl16. 'M04
.
Apr 07 04 09:31a
Dan Glick
l-::1I/U-Ojlf:u-",auu
I"'~
, .
.,
.
11. No UnsiKhtIiness. No unsightliness shall be pennitted on or in any part of the
project. Wrthout limiting the generality of the foregoing, nothing shall be kept or stored on or in any
of the common elements, nothing shall be hung or placed on any of the common elements, and
nothing shall be placed on or in windows or doors of units which would or might create an unsightly
appearance.
12. Restriction on Signs. No signs or advertising devices of any nature sha1I be eRlCted or
maintained on any part of the project.
13. Maintenance of Units and Conunon Elements. Each unit and all improvemelltS,
fixtures and furniture and equipment therein shall be kept and maintained by the unit owner in a clean,
safe, attractive and sightly condition and in good repair. No structural alterations within any UDit or
with respect to any conunon elements shall be made and no electrical, plumbing or similar work
within any unit (except minor repair work localized within the unit not affecting these overall utility
systems) shall be done without the prior written consent of the Association and any building or other
pennits required by the City of Aspen.
.
14. Owner Caused Damage. If, due to the act or neglect of a unit owner, loss or
damage shall be caused to any person or property, including the project or any unit therein, such unit
owner shall be liable and responsible for the same except to the extent that such damage or loss is
covered by insurance obtained by the Association and the carrier of the insunmce has waM:d its rights
of subrogation against such unit owner. The amount of such loss or damage may be collected by the
Association from such unit owner as a special assessment against such unit owner, by legal
proceedings or otherwise, and such amount shall be secured by a lien on the unit of such unit owner
as provided elsewhere in this Declaration for assessments or other charges.
15. Lease Requirements.
I. Any lease shall be in writing and provide that the lease is subject to the terms
of the Deed Restrictions, Declaration, Bylaws, and these Rules and Regulations.
2. Any failure to comply with the terms of the Deed Restrictions, Declarations,
Bylaws, these Rules and Regulations, or any governing documents of this Association shaI1 be
a material default under the lease, enfurceable by the Association. In addition, whenever this
Declaration or any rule or regulation of the Association prohibits any action ot; or assigns
responsibility to, any unit owner and any provision of the Declaration or rule or regu1ation is
violated by a tenant, licensee or guest of any unit owner (or anyone occupying the premises
with his consent), the unit owner shall be responsible for any such violation to the same extent
as if the unit owner had conunitted the same (except to the extent that such liability is
prohibited by law).
3. Each owner shall be individually responsible to send to the offices of the
Association or its Management Company: (1) A copy of any current lease between that
.........~ "''''-'' """""'""'.... ....... 2004
,..
.
Apr 07 04 09:32a
p,an Gl ick
1-970-920-3800
p.:>
t
.
owner and their tenant(s), as well asthetenant(s) phone number and local mailing address;
and (2) A copy of the currenI Rules and Regulations signed by tbe tenant(s).
16. No Impainnent of Structural Intetlrity. Nothing shall be done, without the
written consent of tbe Association, in, on or to, any unit or the common elements, or any portion
thereat: which might impair the structural integrity of the buildings or which would structurally
change the buildings.
17. Bicycles. All bicycles shall be kept in an owner's unit, on a limited common
element appurtenant to an owners' unit, or in areas specifically designated for bicycle storage on the
common elements by the Association.
18. Assessment - Late Payment Interest. Any assessment received after the 5th day of the
month shall accrue interest on the unpaid balance at the rate of 1 3/4% per month.
.
19. ~. After fifteen (15) days written notice to a unit's owner, continuing and/or
negligent disregard for any of these Rules and Regulations or any otber governing covenants of the
Association by an owner or guest may result in the offending unit being assessed an additional
montbly amount, at tbe discretion of the Board ofDirectors, of up to two hundred doOars ($200.00),
plus the cost of actual damages. Continuous and repeated violations for more than twdve (12)
months may result, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, in additional assessment being raised to
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per month, plus the cost of actual damages. The Association shall
have the authority to shut off utilities to any offending unit for failure to pay any fines or for failure to
abide by these Rules and Regulations.
These Rule and Regulations of the Snyder Park Condominiums are adopted the -L day of March,
~1l6 by unanimous consent of the Executive Board of the Snyder Parle Condominium Association.
~'"
-x, " '" "\(, l-J(...l
T' _ . Ls, President
Snyder Parle Homeowners Association
R......._lO<......_"""""""_ April 6,2004
.....'
.
,
,
/
_,r'
~
,
""
CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
'LANNER:
PROJECT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
OWNER:
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
Applicable Land Use
Code Section(s):
Review by:
l>ublic Hearing:
Referral Agencies:
Planning Fees:
Referral Agency Fees:
Total Deposit:
Scott Woodford, 920-5102 (scottwlalci.asoen.co.us) DATE: 4.16.04
Snyder Pari<. Affordable Housing
Sarah Broughton (sarah@rowlandbroughton.com)
Snyder Pari<. Affordable Housing Unit Owners
Snyder Pari<. Affordable Housing Homeowners Association
The applicant proposes two scenarios. \'i=1ario ...cj proposes the applicant have the option
to convert existing, unfinished basem~ space in anyone of the project's 9 one-bedroom
units into a variety of different uses, including the possibility of a bedroom and bathroom.
Under Scenario R), the applicant would like to have the option to convert the existing,
unfinished basement space in the project's one bedroom units into a variety ofuses. such as
media or recreation room, but not including a bedroom or bathroom. Depending on which
scenario the applicant chooses to pursue, there is a difference in the review process. as
noted below. Prior to making an application, the applicant will need to specify which
scenario they propose.
26.445
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment
Staff for completeness of application, referral to applicable agencies for technical considerations
and a Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting, then Planning & Zoning Commission
and City Council for final approval of the above Land Use Code actions. (Note: If the applicant
proposes Scenario A, both P&Z and Council review are required; Scenario B only requires P&Z
review.)
Yes: P&Z and City Council (Note: applicants must post the property and mail notice at least 15
days prior to hearing and shall provide proof of posting and mailing with an affidavit at the
public hearing). (Note: If the applicant proposes Scenario A, a public hearing with both P&Z
and City Council is necessary; Scenario B, only requires a public hearing with P&Z.)
Zoning, Fire Marshall, City Water, ACSD, Building Department, and Housing
Major Fee $2,620 for 12 hours; $220/hr. for additional staffhours
Housing, Major ($355 each)
$2,975
To apply, submit the following infonnation:
I. Proof of ownership with payment.
2. Signed fee agreement.
Q)1>-'" Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name,
address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.
4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a
current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing
the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements
affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application.
.s.",ol"uTotal deposit for review of the application.
/< 24 Copies of the application packet. P&Z = 10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 6; Planning Staff = 1 (Note: 24
copies are required if applicant chooses Scenario A; 17 copies are required if Scenario B is chosen).
7. An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
::l( Site plan and floor plan for typical unit.
9. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed
development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing
conditions as well as proposed.
@ List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing. The GIS department can provide this list on
mailing labels for a small fee (GIS Phone #: 920.5453)
~
.
I""
Copies of prior approvalS. N / ,... .
Applications shall be provided in paper fonnat (number of copies noted above) as well as the text only on either
of the following digital formats. Compact Disc (CD)-preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk. Microsoft Word
fonnat is preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable.
Copy of the homeowners association declarations.
)i
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is
subject to change in the future, and upon filctual representations that mayor may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal
or vested right.
.1""
r-,
-
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project, 311m"" ~ IIrm, fWi1eK - p,; D ~..toT
Apphcant: Sh ~ J/::::I'AJWYlf'.A,.<{
Location: Z.I 'd .
Zone District: 1i1i ~ ~V 9:
Lot Size: ce A ~/~) 1S4-, S'":15 IS F
Lot Area:
(for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
deftnition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
-
Commercial net leasable:
Number of residential units:
Number of bedrooms:
Existing: ;V/A
Existing:
Existing:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): IV /11
-
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area: Existing: Allowable:
Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable:
Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable:
On-Site parking: Existing: Required:
% Site coverage: Existing: Required:
% Open Space: Existing: Required:
Front Setback: Existing: Required:
Rear Setback: Existing: Required:
Combined FIR: Existing: Required:
Side Setback: Existing: Required:
Side Setback: Existing: Required:
Combined Sides: Existing: Required:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
-
Existing non-conformities or encroachments:
Variations requested:
c_
-
""
-
~~iU
II
::
.."'!)
~~~:;~~~~~~
~:::JZ:'" ....',i!
~;Ji
~,
z
U.J
A
b..
VJ
~
';
;
~~
"
'Wt-d .,
""",
~
.
,
. ~""""',~
',,~,
~~
" I> "'
1 ~ ~
, "
> , ,
; ~ , "1
7 , i ~ 0
,.,."'<"" ,
"
"
,
C;:'
w
-
"
"
"
~
~
<
Z
;
~
"
<
f
It
f"
.
;-",;)
~""""'"
"""" !;;; ~:f>"",,,,,,
""''''''''''''''~ !;.... ......""
,. --,"':c",:;'""""", ">>">>,,<>
,J ,0 ""'''''''''''~:.;;;~~~
'"'"
'"'"
'"'"
'"'"
,
,
.
~-'f
~~
~
.
['''''1
....""'--""'-
,of .1~
l#;...~
"'~;? ~i:\
, ,
" "'"'
.I".,..",'" ,~,...";;;,.<<"
Q'..:><::>....-"'"
~--
. ,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below:
o ........... City Engineer
o ........... Zoning Officer
X ........... Housing
o ........... Parks Department
o ........... Aspen Fire Marshal
o ........... City Water
0........... Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
o ........... Building Department
0........... Environmental Health
o ........... Electric Department
o ........... Holy Cross Electric
o ........... City Attorney
o ........... Streets Department
o ........... Historic Preservation Officer
o ........... Pitkin County Planning
TO:
Cindy Christensen, APCHA
FROM:
James Lindt, Senior Planner
Community Development Department
130 So. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611
Phone-429-2763 Fax-920.5439
RE:
Snyder Park PUD Amendment
Parcel ID #2737-181-66-001
DATE:
5/12/05
COMMENTS:
Hi Cindy,
Please find attached an application requesting a PUD amendment to allow for the
unfinished basements at Snyder to be finished with bedrooms and bathrooms. Please
review and return comments to me by June 3'd.
Thanks,
James
APPLICATION SENT OUT TO HOUSING 5/12/05
WRITTEN REFERRAL COMMENTS DUE 6/3/05
-
-'.....,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Plans were routed to those departments checked-off below:
o ........... City Engineer
o ........... Zoning Officer
o ........... Housing
o ........... Parks Department
0........... Aspen Fire Marshal
o ........... City Water
0........... Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
X ........... Building Department
o ........... Environmental Health
o ........... Electric Department
o ........... Holy Cross Electric
o ........... City Attorney
o ........... Streets Department
o ........... Historic Preservation Officer
o ........... Pitkin County Planning
TO:
Dennis Murray
FROM:
James Lindt, Senior Planner
Community Development Department
130 So. Galena St.; Aspen, CO 81611
Phone-429-2763 Fax-920.5439
RE:
Snyder Park PUD Amendment
ParcellD #2737-181-66-001
DATE:
5/12/05
COMMENTS:
Dennis,
Please find attached an application requesting a PUD amendment to allow for the
unfinished basements at Snyder to be finished with bedrooms and bathrooms. Please
review and return comments to me by June 3rd. There will not be a DRC Meeting on
this application.
Thanks,
James
APPLICATION SENT OUT TO HOUSING 5/12/05
WRITTEN REFERRAL COMMENTS DUE 6/3/05
"
,
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
'-....',,,'"
Al!reement for Pavment of Cltv of A,oen DeveIooment Aoollcation Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and -Sli\'1~'Pa.;vk... tLOWIfA"WYI~
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1.
Y an application for
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000)
establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent
to a determination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project. it
is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to thereafter pennit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings andlor approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient infonnation to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning
Commission andlor City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
,""-'
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect
full fees prior to a determination of applicatif completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of$ N I Pi*' which is for mA hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual
recorded costs e;'ceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimbu=
the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of$205.oo
per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and
in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid.
"-
CITY OF ASPEN
APPLICANT
By:
I..ll...~i..... -Nuud" C~vi., B~tt6Y\
Community DeveIopmeut Director
BY:~ P.>VJVj~ [rep~ve.)
Date: 1lalos
M')illng Address:
/ftJw(o.nd+ ~V1N<Jh"frp-, Ifvt.kr..iluju~ a-l
160 -P... uu>pPA/ ~ 1F~':1, U...."aM lXstJ""
('A> 8/fe,/J
~PPM
I I
g:\supportlforms\agrpayas.doc
1/10/01a
-
'-.-.
~ Ci~ will ~~t ri~~ b~ Wet/Ill,! ~ fte.S ( ttS p.vv-
cw..i~ B.,..('" < <:J....'" Uvo.t~ ~