HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.719 E Hopkins Ave.0040.2006.ASLU
..."....,
-
..,
City of Aspen Community Development Dept.
CASE NUMBER
0040.2006.ASLU
PARCEL ID NUMBER 2737-18-2-11-003
PROJECT ADDRESS 719 EHOPKINSAVE
PLANNER JESSICA GARROW
CASE DESCRIPTION
5 UNIT MULTI-F AMIL Y STRUCTURE BUILD PER RMF REPLACE!
;:
\
REPRESENTATIVE ZONE 4544-3541
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 8/17/2006 12:(
CLOSED BY Denise Driscoll
...~-,.-._--^...."_.. ._-~~.
.-
I""'-
-
DEVELOPMENT ORDER
of the
City of Aspen
Community Development Department
This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070,
"Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to
the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall
also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall
expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building
permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension,
reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After
Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding
any growth management alltJtments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to
any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order.
This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific
development plan as described below.
719 East Hopkins LLC: PO Box 2508 Aspen, CO 81612: (626) 705-4138
Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number
Block 104, Lot E & F, located at 719 E. Hopkins Ave.
Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property
The applicant has received Residential Design Guidelines variance approval from the main entry porch
and light well standards to construct a multi-family residence at 719 E. Hopkins Ave.
Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment D~scribing Plan
City of Aspen. Community Develooment Department. Administrative Aooroval for land use approvals
associated with and necessary for construction.
Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions)
August 20. 2006
Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.)
August 21, 2006
Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration
and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen
Municipal Code.)
Issued thi
u ust, 2006, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director.
Chris Bendon, Community Development Director
-
......
PUBLIC NOTICE
Of
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development
plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the
City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the
following described property: Block 104, Lot E & F, located at 719 E, Hopkins Ave, by
Administrative Variances on August 10, 2006. The Applicant received approval of
Residential Design Standard variances from the main entry porch and light well
standards, For further information contact Jessica Garrow, at the City of Aspen
Community Development Dept. 130 S, Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2780.
sf City of Aspen
Publish in The Aspen Times on August 20, 2006
,o.,...__.-II.__.".-..~__._..~.._.._~__~~___.._".___
.....
,-.
1",..--
Section 18: Vested Property Rie:hts
The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan
vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order.
No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to
obtain a development order as set forth in this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the
City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific
development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice
shall be substantially in the following form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific
development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land
Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes,
pertaining to the following described property: 719 Hopkins Ave., City and Townsite
of Aspen, by Administrative Variances of the Aspen Community Development
Director.
.........
I""'-
'-'
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Chris Bendon, Community Development Director
<.JAA
Joyce Allgaier, Deputy Director
Jessica Garrow, Planner 1 cJt}
TO:
THRU:
RE:
719 East Hopkins Ave. Residential Design Standards
Parcel Number: 2737-182-10-003
DATE:
July 27, 2006
SUMMARY:
Zone 4 Architects, represented by Dylan Johns, has applied for a variance to the Residential
Design Standards to construct a multi-family structure containing three affordable housing units
and two free-market housing units at 719 East Hopkins A venue. The proposed plans are
attached as Exhibit "B",
Specifically, the requested variances include the following:
I. Light Wells (26.410,040 D4)
2. Entry Porch (26.410.040 D 1 b)
3. Entry Porch Height (26.410,040 Dlb)
ApPLICANT:
Zone 4 Architects, represented by Dylan Johns, on behalf of 719 East Hopkins A venue LLC
LOCATION:
719 East Hopkins Avenue
ZONING:
MU, Mixed Use District
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny up to
three variance requests from the residential design standards pursuant to Land Use Code Section
26.410,020(D), Variances.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The proposed structure is a multi-family replacement project, which will include three
affordable housing units and two free-market housing units, The proposed design was received
by City Council in their June 12, 2006 meeting. At this meeting, the project was approved, with
changes from the original proposal. These changes included increase the number of levels from
three to five, and moving the affordable housing units to the Garden Level. Both of these
changes were made following an initial City Council Meeting on May 22, 2006 where the
Council expressed concerns that the affordable units were sub-grade and did not provide natural
'.
...-.'n"T
111111111I111111 111111
JANICE K vas C~UDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO
531210
Page; 1 of 7
11/17/2006 09:571
R 36.00 D 0.00
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Chris Bendon, Community Development Director
<JM
Joyce Allgaier, Deputy Director
Jessica Garrow, Planner] cJb)
719 East Hopkins Ave. Residential Design Standards
Parcel Number: 2737-]82-10-003
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
July 27, 2006
SUMMARY:
Zone 4 Architects, represented by Dylan Johns, has applied for a variance to the Residential
Design Standards to construct a multi-family structure containing three affordable housing units
and two free-market housing un its at 719 East Hopkins A venue. The proposed plans are
attached as Exhibit "B".
Specifically, the requested variances includethe following:
1. Light Wells (26.410.040 04)
2. Entry Porch (26.410.040 DI b)
3. Entry Porch Height (26.410.040 Dlb)
ApPLICANT:
Zone 4 Architects, represented by Dylan Johns, on behalf of 7] 9 East Hopkins Avenue LLC
LOCATION:
719 East Hopkins Avenue
ZONING:
MU, Mixed Use District
)
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny up to
three variance requests from the residential design standards pursuant to Land Use Code Section
26.410.020(0), Variances.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The proposed structure is a multi-family replacement project, which will include three
affordable housing units and two free-market housing units. The proposed design was received
by City Council in their June 12,2006 meeting. At this meeting, the project was approved, with
changes from the original praposal. These changes included increase the number of levels from
three to five, and moving the affordable housing units to the Garden Level. Both of these
changes were made following an initial City Council Meeting on May 22, 2006 where the
Council expressed concerns that the affor<lable units were sub-grade and did not provide natural
._._....,...._.II..1rr-~'..._-..
")"'"
..'
531210
Page: 2 of 7
l1/t7/2006 09:57,
JRNICE K vas CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 36.00 D 0.00
light and livability for the affordable housing units. Staff expressed to Council in the June 12,
2006 meeting that the Residential Design Standard Variances needed to accommodate the
Council's affordable housing concerns could be granted administratively.
The front fayade of the proposed building includes a twelve (]2) inch light well, which the
applicant calls a minor depression. Staff finds this is a light welJ, requiring a Residential Design
Standard Variance. The addition of this light well is intended to increase the natural light and
livability of the garden level apartments. Staff finds this variance should be granted.
The applicant also requests a v~riance for Entry Porch length and height. The current structure
includes two entry doors on the front fayade, one for each free-market residential unit. The
entry porch is elevated from the street level by six stairs. This is to accommodate for the garden
level affordable housing units. The entry porch includes a.roof elemennhat extends from the
main wall over the entry steps by 3 feet 1.24 inches. This is the maximum length due to the
siting of the building at the setback lines. An eave encroachment of eighteen (I 8) inches is
permitted in the yard setback (26.575.040 A]). The roof element extends the al]owable
eighteen (18) inches assisting the applicant in attaining greater compliance. Staff finds these
variances should be granted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds that this application meets the applicable review standards for granting a variance
from the building orientation residential design standard and recommends that the Community
Development Director approve this variance request with the following conditions:
I. The eave line for the front entry door extend eighteen (18) inches into the yard setback,
as is permitted by Section 26.575.040 Al of the Land Use Code.
)
,
2
...... . '-"-r---"'-"'~""-~-I"l'r-'-'-'''''-'' ................... --- - ..._....m ....'1"".-.-..
'.._n
1111111111111111 1111 II
JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO
531210
Page: 3 of 7
tt/17/2006 09:57,
R 36.00 D 0.00
APPROVAL:
I hereby approve a variance request, with conditions, from the Entry Door Porch requirements
and the Light Well requirement to 'al]ow for the construction of a multi-family residential project
at 719 East Hopkins Avenue, as represented on the plans attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
~\YDml'::~ 1/Pb
ACCEPTANCE:
1, as a person being or representing the applicant, do hereby agree to the conditions of this
approval and certify the inforination provided in this application is correct to the best of my
Imowledge.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A - Review Criteria and Staff Findings
Exhibit B - Architectural Plans and Neighborhood Conditions
)
\
3
"1___'____'__ ..-.--It.tt"..-.
-'--1"""
_...".,.,_.....-...-.r.".....~....-,.
531210
Page: 4 of 7
D 0.00
EXHIBIT A: REVtEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
The Community Development Director may grant variances from the Residential Design
Standards if the proposed application meets the following:
a) Provides an appropriate design orpal/ern of development considering the
context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular
standard. In evaluating the. cot/tex/as it is usee( in the criteria, the reviewing
board may consider. the relationship of the proposed developmeizt with
adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity
as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific
constraints.
The following are Staff's findings in regards to the variances being requestoo by the
Applicant.
Variance Requested
Lillht Wells. (26.410.040 D4)
All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street
facingfacade(s) ofa building shall be entirely recessed
behind Ihe fronlmosl wall of Ihe building.
l'~.l.
i :':= .' ''-t -
~ 1; L
~--- IIko SIreK
a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the
context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular
standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing
board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with
adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity
as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
Staff Finding:
The application is for a five unit multi-family replacement project, including three
affordable units and two free-market units. The proposed project includes an
approximately 12 inch deep light well on the front fayade of the structure. The light well
was placed to alleviate City Council concerns that the affordable housing units that are at
Garden Level are livable. Staff represented to Council at the June 12, 2006 hearing that
certain issues could be addressed through administrative variances. The livability of the
affordable housing units was an important consideration in Council's approval for the
project, and the applicant has stated the addition of the light well was necessary to meet
Council's requirements. Staff finds the light well has a minimal depth, is in place to
ensure light enters the Garden Level affordable housing units, and is not out of context
with the neighborhood. Staf~ finds this criterion to be met.
)
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific
. crmstraints. .
"'....'.-Ir.,-r...---...'...-...
- .-....."'.."...---tn"..'..-....--------.---..--....-...-....~..--.
.m....--..........-..n-..--r~.."..-_--'---....-__..-_-..._'"'."'-.,,..<. __.__._..____.____.__~........."'I...-_-
531210
Page: 5 of 7
D 0.00
Staff Finding:
This site is 6,000 square feet, and does not possess any unique physical site specific
constraints. Staff does not find this criterion to be met.
Variance Requested
EntrvPorch. (26.410.040 Dlb)
A covered entry porch offifty (50) or more square
feet, with a minimum depth of six feet (6~, shall be
part of the front facade.
Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than
o'}e story in height. '
0",
Story.
--
a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern oj development considering the
context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular
standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing
board may consider the rtlJltionship of the proposed development with
adjacent structures, the immediate, neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity
as the boardfeels is necessary to determine if the exception 'is warranted; or,
Staff F.inding:
The front entry porch is enclosed and includes living space above. To better meet the
standard, the applicant added a covered roof element to the porch measuring 3 feet 1.25
inches in length, and extends 18 inches into' the setback as permitted by Section
26.575.040 A] of the Land Use Code. The element does not meet the letter of the code
requirements, but is as long as possible given the structure's location on the lot. The
proposed structure is located at the setback lines, and is unable to provide a larger entry
roof element without encroaching into the setback. Staff finds the roof elements
extending from the covered porches adequately balance the residential design standards
with the other standards the application is required to meet. Staff finds this criterion to be
met. )
b) Be clearly" necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specifIC
constraints. '
Staff Finding:
This site is 6,000 square feet, and does not possess any unique physical site specific
constraints. Staff does not find this criterion to be met.
Entry Porch Height, (26.410.040 Dlb)
A covered entry porch offifly (50) or more square
feet, with a minimum depth of six feet (6~, shall be
part of the front facade.
Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than
one story in height.
"'"
Story
EJcm"".....
.-..-...... ~-'~I'-'
"-'Irn---'--'
....n.......-'.--rtfO.-.-..-
."....__..,,_.-'--."rrr~..--'_._.---
.-.....".- .....<_.__n__no''n....'...,. ~.----1-~.--., ,...._.... __...~
,.
,.
Jtn II JUtlllJltJUt JLJ~~~:~~;t~9:57
a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the
context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular
standard. In evaluating the context as iJ is used in the criteria, the reviewing
board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with
adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity
as the boardfeels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
Staff Finding:
The proposed structure includes two entry doors and porches, each leading to one of the
two tree-market units; each is elevated from the street. The elevated porches were part of
the design City Council approved at their June 12, 2006 meeting. The elevated porches
help accommodate the affordable housing units placed at Garden Level. The issue of the
porch height was addressed by Staff to Council at the June 12,2006 City Council meeting,
and it was recommended by Council that this variance be approved administratively. Staff
finds this criterion to be met. .
b) Be dearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specifIC
constraints.
Staff Finding:
This site is 6,000 square feet, and does not. possess any unique physical site specific
constraints. Staff does not find this criterion to be met.
)
,
.,." --"'--'---'-'r---"--' "'--~-"""-II"1rT'"
. .'-'1~~--"'--'-""
__._~._..,..~~""'__.w,
.~
~
?
-+-
~
~
~
ill
z
o
f-
~
LU
..J
LU
f-
en
LU
3:
t
~
>1:')\19139 lNOC!l:::l ::V 3NIl
-- - - -- W
3NIl ..llC!l3dOC!ld
U
Z
<(
'" -
II) et:
01 <(
....'" >
'"
ISI "'ID'"
0'" . rJl
..... ",,,,
N ....N Cl
,-0
..... ...... et:
('t) .- <(
0"-
l!) ~- Cl
0._",
'" Z
ID <(
'" f-
a: rJl
Z
0 0 Z
u i= Cl
>-
0- ~
z rJl
"
0 LU w
u
..J Cl
z LU
'" I ...J
0- <(
D- f-
-' Il:: f-
-' 0 Z
a Z
" w
'" Cl
u
U>
0 rJl
>
'" W
'" et:
u
Z W
'"
~ ::>
z
w
>
<(
en
3NI ~ J...!<S3dOCSd Z
~
D-
O
J:
')1':)119139 INOCS::l ::10 3NIl f-
-- --
Z en
0 <(
~ W
LU en
..J ....
LU .....
f-
en
<(
LU
."
,....R....
,-.
'-
light and livability for the affordable housing units, Staff expressed to Council in the June 12,
2006 meeting that the Residential Design Standard Variances needed to accommodate the
Council's affordable housing concerns could be granted administratively.
The front fa~ade of the proposed building includes a twelve (12) inch light well, which the
applicant calls a minor depression, Staff finds this is a light well, requiring a Residential Design
Standard Variance. The addition of this light well is intended to increase the natural light and
livability of the garden level apartments. Staff finds this variance should be granted.
The applicant also requests a variance for Entry Porch length and height. The current structure
includes two entry doors on the front fa~ade, one for each free-market residential unit. The
entry porch is elevated from the street level by six stairs, This is to accommodate for the garden
level affordable housing units, The entry porch includes a roof element that extends from the
main wall over the entry steps by 3 feet 1.24 inches. This is the maximum length due to the
siting of the building at the setback lines, An eave encroachment of eighteen (18) inches is
permitted in the yard setback (26,575,040 AI). The roof element extends the allowable
eighteen (18) inches assisting the applicant in attaining greater compliance. Staff finds these
variances should be granted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds that this application meets the applicable review standards for granting a variance
from the building orientation residential design standard and recommends that the Community
Development Director approve this variance request with the following conditions:
1. The eave line for the front entry door extend eighteen (18) inches into the yard setback,
as is permitted by Section 26,575,040 Al of the Land Use Code.
2
.".'---~~-".._..-... .~--.--..'I __
---
,-..
'----
ApPROVAL:
I hereby approve a variance request, with conditions, from the Entry Door Porch requirements
and the Light Well requirement to allow for the construction of a muIti- family residential project
at 719 East Hopkins Avenue, as represented on the plans attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
~~~o/rm'~~~ Wb
ACCEPTANCE:
I, as a person being or representing the applicant, do hereby agree to the conditions of this
approval and certify the information provided in this application is correct to the best of my
knowledge,
Date /vt'- /1, ~
on 4 Architects
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings
Exhibit B -- Architectura1 Plans and Neighborhood Conditions
3
-
,<-
'"
EXHIBIT A: REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS
The Community Development Director may grant variances from the Residential Design
Standards if the proposed application meets the following:
a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the
context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular
standard. In evaluating the context as it is use4 in the criteria, the reviewing
board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with
adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity
as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific
constraints.
The following are Staffs findings in regards to the variances being requested by the
Applicant.
Variance Requested
Lizht Wells. (26.410.040 D4)
All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street
facing facade(s) of a building shall be entirely recessed
behind the frontmost wall of the building.
I .
. t
! I J.,;.J
~ I '\
. I
d .
~__~...--l. I
u;:;' '-i ,.
L
--. IlI<Io ~1reet
a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the
context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular
standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing
board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with
adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity
as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
Staff Finding:
The application is for a five unit multi-family replacement project, including three
affordable units and two free-market units. The proposed project includes an
approximately 12 inch deep light well on the front fayade ofthe structure, The light well
was placed to alleviate City Council concerns that the affordable housing units that are at
Garden Level are livable. Staffrepresented to Council at the June 12, 2006 hearing that
certain issues could be addressed through administrative variances, The livability of the
affordable housing units was an important consideration in Council's approval for the
project, and the applicant has stated the addition of the light well was necessary to meet
Council's requirements. Staff finds the light well has a minimal depth, is in place to
ensure light enters the Garden Level affordable housing units, and is not out of context
with the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific
constraints.
-
I""'-
'-'
Staff Finding:
This site is 6,000 square feet, and does not possess any unique physical site specific
constraints, Staff does not find this criterion to be met.
Variance Requested
Entrv Porch. (26.410.040 Dlb)
A covered entry porch offifty (50) or more square
feet, with a minimum depth of six feet (6'). shall be
part of the front facade.
Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than
one story in height.
0..,
StO~'
EJ~t-+
~
I
o
a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the
context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular
standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing
board may consider the rtlationship of the proposed development with
adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity
as the boardfeels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
Staff Finding:
The front entry porch is enclosed and includes living space above, To better meet the
standard, the applicant added a covered roof element to the porch measuring 3 feet 1.25
inches in length, and extends 18 inches into the setback as permitted by Section
26.575.040 AI of the Land Use Code, The element does not meet the letter of the code
requirements, but is as long as possible given the structure's location on the lot. The
proposed structure is located at the setback lines, and is unable to provide a larger entry
roof element without encroaching into the setback. Staff finds the roof elements
extending from the covered porches adequately balance the residential design standards
with the other standards the application is required to meet. Staff finds this criterion to be
met.
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific
constraints.
Staff Finding:
This site is 6,000 square feet, and does not possess any unique physical site specific
constraints, Staff does not find this criterion to be met.
Entrv Porch Heif!:ht. (26.410.040 Dlb)
A covered entry porch offifty (50) or more square
feet, with a minimum depth of six feet (6'), shall be
part of the front facade.
Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than
one story in height.
0..,
5too)'
ElemelJ.t'""*
08."'S"
'01
-
I""'-
'-'
a) Provides an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the
context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular
standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing
board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with
adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity
as the boardfeels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or,
Staff Finding:
The proposed structure includes two entry doors and porches, each leading to one of the
two free-market units; each is elevated from the street. The elevated porches were part of
the design City Council approved at their June 12,2006 meeting, The elevated porches
help accommodate the affordable housing units placed at Garden Level. The issue of the
porch height was addressed by Staff to Council at the June 12,2006 City Council meeting,
and it was recommended by Council that this variance be approved administratively. Staff
finds this criterion to be met.
b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific
constraints.
Staff Finding:
This site is 6,000 square feet, and does not possess any unique physical site specific
constraints. Staff does not find this criterion to be met.
1I~-ol-'I~/l
tW",
I ><
.
I
rr
,
I
,
I
,
I
(M-O-<Y ,O~.OZ) Nj~~ 3119
'~~ I (i~,
,00 '09 I '(IVIII tt,60.!;LN
! I .~ .
I
I
i
-----
-::>
------
~
"',~
~~
------lJ
i' ~~
f ~~
- ---- II
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
C5
~-------(9-
~~
,......S'-~
'8- A-ik)'V
;;,.'. .
.
~
r-\:
2iJ
~
(11\
, I .. '7 I I
C:l xE / !l g1lL JJ !l
C:l
~ - ,'\. I
II
~
~)~
"
-
~d5'<J
v 1::0..
o
. I<L
I
I
I
I
--
~
I!
"
N . I
, ,
, I
Q')
Q ,";/-
"t-.. C:l "
~ ,
,
0 ";/- ,
~~~ ,
~
.
I
I ~[L
I ~'
II:
t':l
~
~, gEfJ \ L ---.J i::l
is;J )C f f ~c@ ~,
t.~ C I --, f,~
~ )- '"
q .-.
~.
.
. ~
(
~ ,~ [>( X ~ ~)/ /\ ic~ I
/ _ ~[1~ v11\~O \ ~
~ ~ t-:;;;- ~ 3 ~ 'iIllL
o ] ;~ ~
r--
x 1= x
.. ..
it it
- ~-
o =: ~
~~~
L\~L
,
.
c:i r:::
C:l
.......
a
~
~
, .
,";/-
C:l
~
";/-
'"-
<:
.
~[J
IL ~(~
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
.
n "
r-"
~
..
.
!l IZ
.
.
,
,--.
!l
.
1/
.~
._ (0.-
_ __ __ J ~
!"
!-
f;~
,
.;
:
.:::
~
- '""
'P~
,
___ __ _oJ
! [ II
I
,
....
~ I".
Qv
-~-
-r
-------------
~
711)
~
,~'
..
llJlC'l~
z.~\6l- f sld
10 ~l")'~ II '\l~
.I<.'J . ptI1'
.Wo'" NI.I "4i
I~@
//11/
,00'09
e Mil iL,60.!;LN
<ill ~~ --\-\
." """-..... ...J :
-HI>~ .S'~ .
~ ~
~
v
--
D
:::s
v-
'1111/
rll/\.JrI/l11
T
A A/>, I
/l/l or-> /
.. -_..__.----....._-_..~,~,,< ..... ._>.-...~-
"--".,.~---,....~~.,~-",<
r
I
I
4>-
I
r-----------------------------1-----________________________,
I I I
: I :
I I
I I
I I
I I I
: I :
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I I
i I I
: I
! I
I
I
I
--4J
'i 'i
4>-- ~ ~
.
q1
~~ ~cI
{fr-~ ~ [j ~
"l'!l =
~t!Il2
I
~~
=
>'.I
"Il
S
0
lIl:l cI [j
{fr- [f ~
[I
{fr-
.
I
I
I
I
I
4
.
~ -" ~_.._,~=,~... ...._~___. "......,..,,_,..._"'-,T-".".._~_.
.
~
--.-\
\
~
'NJ
~
---..
,::-<.
~
~
~
"N
~~
~
~ii'!
.
~S
o
~
~
~
,. ~....,;,....",
D liri 0 []O (i-'
JU.u, i~ilt
_____ It (~[jl. J_.
~ ~';)l ~ /l
'I .
Drtl!~
0JJ1~
.J7tJ
r T II I
ll?~ d-c1 . ~
~
III
.
1'1
"
II
"
"
I
~~
rl II
. I
.
-
.
.
.
!
,..~
~-
~
.'
~
,......,.,........-....".---
.
II
DeI~ helD ~
3( 0 .
I'
~ f. "
,I
'I II.IU "
D -II'
o 11.1 ~ J
= D~
'f~ '-= r1 r1 ~
-
( ~.
If - ~kJ lJ II
- I -
l! ~
l!
"" '\V
r
' , 'I
~---~~
+1 +- TJ-, -.. ~ ,
.
J7
.
o
[J L-
~
-
.
'" .l.-
I r T 11
~~D
!!rk ~ L)
ilLS ~ 01
. .-- "" ..........
U,' ~
.
.
l!
.
I
'G~
If""
,
Q~
.'
\1
--'
~
~
~
-\,:",)
<:::::s-
~
'" --_.~_.".^..,'
- - - r-,
- I
~ I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
r r .
I I
I I
. I
r f l~
I ~~
I 'f .~ "
I
I b ~ W
I 'il!-( li!
I ~ li!
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I .
· :7 ~ I l! l! C "
I)~ '-
-
~
r~ T
.
I
I
r I
I I
I I
I I
r
I --C -:=r
I W ~~
r .
~~ Wcj III
I I! ~,
I BI~ " t
. r B.~
I .. ~ r- !l'
.- ..
I ;r q .-e
I ~ ~
r
I
I
r
I
I
I
. ~
~ .
\ (
.
. ~
.
~A/ ~ rx IX (5 ~A/ ~
~v- ~II
Al \-. o II
::; :.....- ) ~c1^"
- e ~I~
II: ~(- r<z ~ ;:;
on - ~
"! .
- b ~ ~~
..
. ~
" "'-1-
.. ~ .
I . ~ ,
.
I , '--- 0 ~
I
I l! l .
I ~--: ....
I
. I'"
--,
I
I I
I --- -~
I '-- --
I
'-- -- - -~
..t..
( ~ I Q ~
I
EJj
~i2
;:.t.lliJ
~~
· ::d
~><
d:F;ij
tii
t'"
I
I
I
:)
-
-
I
e
,
____J
<--
-""'~"h..~.,
';'",~-,--
~
"-..:;-
,~
\_-'
.-...-.-.-....,...--......."..'''.
~
4>-
~
~
~
~
~
I
I
I
N N
~[j ~[j
l\ l\
N
N ~ ~ ~
~ci ,.-ci
c c
~ r-Ir-Ir-I f"""'\ f"""'\ f"""'\ ~
~~ ~~
r-I fT T
I I r-I
I I
[ ] I I [ b
~ci ....., -(II! ~~ I.- ~~
[ ] . . [ b
H ;~ .. ~ to- ~
. ,.:.
[ ~ ] """" [ b
II! I I
I I
'-J r I \....I
1\ I I (
I I
I I
I I
r I -, -
lfi ~ ~.....,. _. ~____.J L_ --
&. ..
~~ 11 ~~
~ l! ~
- l) ~-X x ~
icl ~I
I~ ~ ill L'( f
Ii - j
...--J
0 :l~ -
!~ ~ -
- = -' " -
" l\
= ;[ ~ ~ =
~ "
-'J ---, l\ 1/"-
l\ D D
D [
I
a ~ I Q)
I
~
'"
"
,I
~'.. III
--4}
--4-
~
---<t}
~
---<t}
..
*
~
.~
-
""'-"-
~~'-'.
~
\'c,'
~
~z
~~
Ill:
m
r
m
~
-t
2
-----" -
:)
,
~
~'I}
~~.
.-
;;
,
~
~
';;1
b
..
I I
I I
:r-------T--.
II, I'
", ,
III I
III I
", I
II, I
"I ,
"I I
", I
", I
II
~-------+-
H
II' ,
II' I
I" ,
III I
III ,
III I
II' I
III I
HI ,
~-------+-
II, ,
", I
"I I
II, ,
", ,
", I
", ,
", I
II, I
", ,
III ..i'
Lr"------- --
--<!}
--<!}
~
I
I
I
S
-=s
;::::::,
----~y
.~
('~
~-')
~.--~ ".. ..._- ..->>-"'".,,<..~. .~..,-,. '.~...,~,,~,..,
N
~ffl
'CP
7~
~m
r
m
~
-I
2
~
i
l
,~
~
<
I
I I
~ -___-1_
::1--- I
III I
", I
"I I
III I
1'1 I
: ~-------i
"I ,
"I I
: ~-------i
"I I
"I I
"I I
"I I
III I
"I I
"I I
"I I
", I
"I I
"I I
I~-------r
HI I
III I
"I I
", I
"I I
"I I
"I I
"I I
"I I
"I I
II ..L_
l}----f1r---
II
II'
III
II
II'
"I
II
II'
III
II
III
"I
II
II'
III
II
II'
'II
II
II'
It}. --
~I -
, , ,
(
(
'" I ""'fll
<..11'"
--4)
--4)
l!
!
I
I
--4)
~
\
I
\
I
\
I
I
I
~
,
~
~b
j.'
;J
<
~!
E:
~'''''.'''.'
.-.....~-.....
~
\..~
,.._..~"~'~.""~""-,....._.,'''-_..__._, ..,-.-
....'fI! ~1
,
"'II....'
~~ , , ~
:~ .. ~
~~ ~ ~
I I
.'
I
111IO
I
111IO
I
111IO
I
111IO -4>
I
I
I
111IO
I
C.:l 111IO
,~
I
7-1
~:t:
m
r -4
m
~
-I
2
3"'
~
~
~,:'"c..--.~
,~
';"'---.."\
.
,-.....-
'~
"~o<..." ......,._.. +.,...
I
I
I """'I
~
.... I
I
I
I -4
I
I
-' ~
r
,
!!i---
II,
:~------
II,
"I
II
II,
iL----- ;; ,
n __~L____, ,:,~..; '. ~ I , l
- ill . 'It. '. 1 +-
I if I. /" I It.., l1'J1jI '. -t
I" I / '",,- ~., .', I
III 1'/ ."""""
.' I.,.,.,
I" , . , '" .
III I ': ':'. '" . i!! '
: ~------fr ill rrm II~ 14
III I "IE!;
III I I, T,
I" I 17 ;-r
I "I I \ "'"
III I , _
III 1
I" I
I" I
III I
III I ~., ':'"
It--- T ~ ~ ' " " ,
III I !lk, /
I II I, . ~ , "
I" I ,'," I , " I
I" I'
III I
III I
III I
III I
I" I
III I
III I
III I
~ I" I
-m I" I
~~ I" I
~~ I" I
r I" I
~ I" I
.... I" I
-l III I j
2 III
111___-
UT
,
,
""...<~--,
,
I
f~
~~
.~
~
i
~
.IL
I fTTTll
,j
- 'U'
I T
", T 'TT JL~~
TT_
'. liD- '
I :0;;:
,
~ i;liHIlll
mw.Ill
, 'Jr!.IIIIJ,n1
,
"1 I
"
-r
I ,
I ."
I ". " I
I . ( I
I I, ".,
. I I I '
, , rl1'IUnI I ,
' ,
IJl r1l" . "" I
"' . ,IL ,
' /11. I . .n: , I
' . ',' In,' I
. I.
", ut:I:dr ,
I r"'" I I I " I
t-
. , I--
, ,I--
,
"TT ,
'lit. , .
" f'l' .n
TI'\
,
'rr
'. . ,', ~. ',trt.!tI~f[ I
I , ~"'tJ;" .', I
I . ~I I
.1. , I ,
. ,
I~' , J:J,.,
'n' I I /, I
It"
"', I
. ".
~, . , I
I j , "
~ ,
I-jJ
/:/
"B""
I I "
'.
- - - ~~
- -
I
1~ ., ~~
i!~~
t
.~ ~
.. .
I
II~
F
~ F
~
I)-~
:IT
~
~~
IWh
IIIW/r,-
IW/./O
V/ I
,
I
,
,
~
,
I
I
-j-
--;-
.""
~
I
I
~~
~/.
Iln
1=
ill I
II Ii;;
~ I '-
. '-
,L..' I i~
I \ ".
I ~
I ~
I
I
I
-S:
T&...
[I~
~
-$
-$
~
~
-'-\
------
'~~/":--cS,
\S:~~
,""".,
\:
\..~
AACHI-TECTS
L. L.O.
P.O. BOX 2508
ASPEN CO 81612
Ph 970.544.3541
F 970.544.8211
July 6, 2006
Community Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
The following is and application for an administrative variance from the residential design
standards, This project is a multi-family replacement project and includes 3 affordable housing
units and 2 free marlcet units, It is located on a 6,000 sf lot at 719 East Hopkins Avenue, and is a
mixed area of development, 100 standard which we are requesting an exemption from is
26.410.040 (D)(I)(b) A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet. with a minimum
depth of six feet (6 J. shall be pon of the front fafade, Entry porches and canopies shall not be
more than one story in height
100 building has been configured to comply with this regulation with the exception that there is
living space above the en1Iy porch area on both units. As this project was approved by City
Council, the atfurdable housing units have been located on a garden level, with access provided
on the east side of the site (necessary for accessibility requirements), The primary entrances to
the two free marlcet residences are fucing Hopkins Ave, and are elevated from the street level.
Parking is being provided off of the alley per City guidelines,
This has been a challenging project to design from the standpoint of meeting the requirements of
the muItifiunily replacement policy and the affordable housing unit location, site constraints, on
site parlcing, and design guidelines. We feel that this project maintain. a good balance
accommodating these different elements on a 6,Ooosf site. With setbacks, the building envelope
footprint is under 4,3oost; leaving little room for program. The initial design, with the same
program and designed per the applicable land use code, was 3 levels and offered much more
flexibility to work within the design standards, However, at Council review, it was felt that the
livability of the affordable housing units needed to be improved, and those units were moved to a
location more to their liking, Because of accessibility issues and the physical parameters of the
site, the building has now become a 5 level building and has only two contiguous levels at the
lowest basement level and the uppermost level.
As you will see from attached context photos, this area of town has rather mixed design styles and
isn't currently designed to the pedestrian, The south edge of Hopkins Avenue does not have a
sidewalk along the entire length of the block where the project is located, A significant portion of
this block currently acts as a driveway for four different garages.
----~~~----"_.
The adjacent residence to the east has an elevated entry condition, and the adjacent residences to
the west face their garages onto Hopkins and do not comply with any of the design standards with
the exception ofbeing parallel to the street, This building also appears to have recently
undergone an extensive exterior renovation, and it could be assumed that the current owner(s) are
not planning a redevelopment anytime soon, after having spent the money on a remodel.
On the north edge of Hopkins, a large multifamily development runs along % of the block length,
The buildings are pulled back off the street and a rence that runs along the length of the property,
While there are one story elements to these buildings, it is difficult to ascertain where the entries
fur each of the units are located, and the building appears as a ralher non-descript monolith.
We have taken great care to try to bring the scale of this building down using lower shed roofs,
and have used more transitional urban design elements typically seen in brownstone and row
house neighborhoods, We do not feel that this form of architecture is any less "pedestrian
friendly" than its Victorian model, and is perhaps more appropriate given the architecture of the
buildings in this block and zone district,
We request that this design variance be approved based on the site specific constraints that are
inherent with accommodating multi-family replacement requirements on a small lot and
accommodating the specific requirements placed upon this project by the City Council that were
not part of the land use code at the time of this application. Additionally, we feel that the
immediate context fur this project represents a wide range of design and pedestrian interfilces, but
would not support that the neighborhood pattern is currently consistent with the intent of the
design standards as they are outlined in the land use code. We feel that this project is tastefully
designed, is able to accomplish many goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan (especially as it
pertains to housing local worlcing and encouraging economic diversity in projects), and will serve
to enhance the pedestrian environment in this neighborhood. Thank you fur your consideration,
~ )\
r; ~J
~'- ........
") -..... ~I
_"_u_
--- - --~.~~~,~_..---
I n ~ 4f - ...~
':ll~" <:> . .Oq .9~~ ~
H-~I ~ a..,'"
lJ -, 'D.'
i
~J ~ I" ...J II CJ Jo oil
/}, "f....<~ ,......I?lt[? ~ CJ tJO <::::j ..~ 7.
~~ ~~ ~~-r- ;'0 .r;g CJ Ol;::?D()
~ ~ '<.AL ~ 0 p (5JOrw; ~~ ~.
~ r/'7,~ OC:::J[J!J / ";;:"'~A r--... .
<J '8" Jf1.~ " ~ ~.-
I.) '#,.., ~ ) - r:L'C"-
O' ...I..J 0 . N Of] -;:f- )~ ~. '1
~ A ::;.'-)~ -, l-'
. O~ <:>. (:i.... :; (';'" OJ
~ ""'- ~.Q
...#.... O~a;;; 0 ~ Dr/Ln., & ,...,
T 'b ~D rj'l">' g::)
t:::) ~ r FJ/f5
nZ 'Gi rl 7I11i;;1 i ., l
\~i o~ 'N !;J/~ ~ ~
.I d5::1(//::;;1 D'~ ~'/~ '-Jj ~
\' "-./, f:j / /[S,!lfJJI $ 7 ~09 Q
u ~ '/ jJ, ~1I31
a
~
.1
.
--,
r
....
teA N
-.,
~. ,.. :.-J
~'l'"
,,....-:
III
jl/(
...JJ7
/,
'fr""l,
t:Sc;
~
'\ :o-..'\.'\.'
" '\.:
~ ,kll,
~~
~
"
~~
::-
u
-
~
~~
bTf1 a
m
=-
iJ
'I
~' ~
~~ . "-
~u
\.1
'- -qs;.
....
'\.1/\..'\.'
;-, -
k
~
1:
'i'
~
:::t:
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
i
~7/06/2006 11:10 FAX
raJOOl
,,,,."'"
hJly 6, 2lJO(j
Aspcu Commllllity DevcJopmcot Department
130 SoUlh GaJeaa StreeI:
Aspen, CO 81611
Rc: 719 EastHopkia.s Ave..-ApplicaliQII foullAdmiaisnlivnarillaQl fivm tbc Reslclell1ial
Daip Studards
J hmeby autborlze Zoac 4 ArdIitects, u.c (234 East HopIdas Ave, Aspea CO 11611) to act as
our dIoclgto"'--d 8d authorized rep selltatlye with respect to the land use application bein&
submitted to your office far 0111' JIlOIlClties located lit 7l1l East Hoptias A _ (Pan:eI1D Ne:
213711211003). Zaac 4 Archib:cts, ILC is III1Iboriad to Sllbmlt an 1Ipplic:alion far lID
Admiais1rarive VariaDce fi:om die R-w-lal Design StDdards 8d my AMI-..J actiODS
mpDraI in )Il1I'II1it oflhao: -- Zaac: 4 An:hitecta, ILC is also lIIIIJu.UallD ''''J'' toot... in
meeliDp with City Slaff; bcNIrds, commissioas, and the City Council
ShoUld you haw my DllCld to IlOIIlKt me cluring tile c:ollne of your JeView, please do SO tbrougb
lbe ofIic:cs ofZou 4 AMiloMl., LLC.
SiaeeteJy,
C\ ~~-/ J-~~
John Louderbaek; Member
719 East HopIdDs AVelIue, LLC.
P.O. Box 11600
Aspeo, CO 11612
(626) 705-4138
DJ6i-1i JS~v?l1h.eL-1 C/n~hd[) j'~~/(J2;1-
. f'I2o J Et.T
ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION
711
TO riate
REPRESENTATIVE:
Ll..-c.
CO I,,) z..
Name:
Address:
Phone #:
PReJEeT: MI'LI
Name:
Address:
frV~E
!of J!"'V
I-i..-c.....
(J> (J 161'-
0 Conditional Use 0 Conceptual nm 0 Conceptual Historic Devt.
0 Special Review 0 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) 0 Final Historic Bevelopment
0 Design Review Appeal 0 Conceptual SPA 0 Minor Historic Devt.
0 GMQS Allotment 0 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) 0 HistOric Demolition
0 GMQS Exemption 0 Subdivision 0 Historic Designation
0 ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream 0 Subdivision Exemption (includes 0 Small Lodge Conversion!
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff; condominiumization) Expansion
Mountain View Plane
0 Lot Split 0 Temporary Use S Other:
0 Lot Line Adiustment 0 Text/Map Amendment 1tt3. ~/60~ 6rJl"oL.I~" .ttwllll. v.f1u If' f.I~
e:x/S'1, oAJ~ b l)MT /III F "'I1!Jff!o ~rw~e- -("0 ere- P..".,,z,/ftlb,,?
sed buildin s, uses, modifications, etc.
!5 IN/I A VL. -rx -Plfwtll..i .$"P'WCTtA'zr 'E'1J)L7 P8Z. eJllfF fZ@'~N"C""
Gl VI 06l.J
Have you attacbed the following? FEES DUE: S 'f. 1(5'"
o Pre-Application Conference Summary
o Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
o Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form .
o Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
All plans that are larger than 8.5" x II" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written
text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application,
~;
RETAIN FOR PeRlWlhr lIIOQIW
,07/06/2006 11: 10 FAl
-
1jlJ002
em OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPIIl!ENT DEPARTMENJ
cm'OFASPEN(lleNiutiercrtY)""" 71" J:1Ifs'T -wtllllJ NP'fi U4 ~ Uv~~1 "'e._be.
~~"'AGREEASJ'OLLOWS:
AD -fArps- "ofQtw.,,,"-~ IAD.O tLu.F_
1. APPl..lC.\ll.'Thu.'~ 1oO'JY.. 'WL:~~ Car
~11 I!JIn" ~d'rcl-'l _ _ .
(Iaadaafscr, 1IIE l"ItOJECr).
2. Al'J'UCA."" vlll\ dJ UJcI _ ... 0Iy of AIpcD. 0rdiuDcc N"o. 57 (Scricr of' 2IlCIO)
.........,'-In.,.._fer~'Uoeappllcmi_UJcIdIe.--gfallpl 'v~isa__.. '",.
to aHtClJllillM:i.. g( 1pJI.:.....:. tGnlp...... .
3. AP1'1JCA.'fT """ Q'JY ................., oc..... -. _ ... """"" lie <he po. . ~.d pn>jc:cl, ir
is - _1oIc . .ddt ... .. __ ... liJII _ fIf "'" _ ....woI ill ."" . I ... IpJIIiCllliaa.
Al'fUCANr... CII'Y ............. ....1I.111a._....... oC_ ...,..... APPLJCAlI<'T aloe ~ DC.
iaiiioI ....... III.......,...... '-'_ _ Ie Joe IlillallIO ~'T... ~.l>aIir.
A1'f1.ICANr IIJIa IddirH.I_ _ _ faUo................v. ~ API'UCA.""""" lie
- .. b -:... by '. -. v"-'" Iiqaioity ... will _ .., .1.... ..- ..Iif;~ by.
ClIY...........,. - z . _...--.." C1Y _ it will...' - 1...............--..,
of"""-iositslUJ1___AnUC.\!l.TS uti L Uo
~. Cl'IY 84 AP1'UC.\.'" iiuWr .... ... iI is iIIpr>ro' .,... fer OIY aIf ... ........_
-... . v"'_~ lllllillf.. - ==p'.....<;;> . .......va.cq,c......:iI"'......IlooP'.......oC
r '. ....... ClIy c....u la ..u1lplJ,o......... ...... .. JIIIlia:r . , . .... ..... _ biIIiap
....... ill... prior III .........
S. IlMIn:irft, AP1'UC.\.\T........iIl 'j u.. aiM err. ___ al'hsnpr... PIlla
fidI.. pri..... ~~ '. '-"" at 1IJIJIIWa.. . . r. Al'I'UCA.'IT oWl .. _ iaiJioI .........._ 1IIc
iQOIIalllCS ~t5' ....islir~........ aI'~1 .ill'Dlo-", DfJ'-, _If_
1aaiW - - .... iIiIiIl........ APPlJCANT IIJIU pay IIlIifia-: IIIGIIIbIy billiap III C1Y 11>. ;u~ _I<-
..OlYfer.....,. . _at.....,. 'r. ',-..;.. r :- -..........................-OC$2]QJJO
JII!I'.............._....ioillaI....... SadI......~ lIiIIIII......--.lD ...,..at""'lIWiIIIda. _
AJI'UCA:NT.............. .......pay... ......_.. ___iii' . _... _ .....,
ia_C8k~bIIildiDc"'-bcilruad""'oII__...'.' ,1l/iIIl_JRl . _..we....poiod. .
COY OE AIPDI
An'LICA!Q'
719 EAST
HOPKINS AVENUE,
L..-tc
LLC
----
B,,;
By.;
CIoris __
..... ..JJJ8D~ . ..
,
ER
to- .~ ...fI6..._'~..,.......
O"....JM
11II1'. ~Addnss_T"". 'we~
. . ..
719 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE, LLC
p.O. BOX '1600, ASPEN, CO 81612
(626) 705-(138
mAIN FOR PERMANENT RfCORO
.._.,jl.~.
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
Project:
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
,Lot Size:
Lot Area:
7/ '1 oer *f'K11lJ5 Uc:..
7/'1 ~, I.4Df/(WJ L.L. c...
7/1 ~-r Uo/ll(lo./.$ lnI(#MJjJ~, ~
lSl..... ,All Xc'"'!). U.f/i" ("'Iv)
~, ODO SF
~,,~D Sf'
(for the pmposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
Within.the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes, Please refer to the
defmition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Co=ercial net leasable:
Number of residential units:
Number of bedrooms:
Existing:
Existing:
Existing:
IIPr
r"
S
Proposed:
Proposed:
Proposed:
.vA-
.5
8
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): rVlt-
DIMI:NSIONS: ~ SF Proposed:
Floor Area: Existing: 5: LtW Allowable: ~,(;()()$P
Principal bldg, height: Existing: Allowable: 3"Z. Proposed:
Access. bldg. height: Existing: A/A- Allowable: ,.v-A- Proposed: AI-1-
On-Site parking: Existing: 0 Required: 5 Proposed: 2-
% Site coverage: Existing: AlA- Required: Al4- Proposed: #4-
% Open Space: Existing: ~,% Required: . 2$'10 Proposed: 39%
Front Setback: Existing: II. S Pi Required: I () IT Proposed: .f 10 F7
Rear Setback: Existing: I J . 0 f1 Required: 5'Fr Proposed: ~.s17
Combined FIR: Existing:-Z:Z. 8 F1 Required: ) 5" PI Proposed: J5 P1
Side Setback: . Existing: 5' F'1 Required: 5n Proposed: .oPT
Side Setback: Existing: 7,'3 P1 Required: sr-r Proposed: SF'1
Combined Sides: Existing: I z., $ F1 Required: Jof/ Proposed: 15 f"1
Distance Between Existing .11I4-" . Required: loF7 Proposed: .AI 4-
Buildings
Existing non-conformities or encroachments:--.M' ~ G:
Variations requested: ZiP . q/O.()~O ~}LlU'b)
_..iI--~.,.
---------
7S'09'11"W
60.00'
--.... -' .
~ ~~ t$
,,~:n1fJ . ~ 01
fc\. l' f 'ro' tOt1
---- pl.s 79'1->
~~)
~
~J' .p~
.... ~ ~
~
3/\'7' 9NI>ldOH 19'7'3
-------------
I _1_ ,
~x --J;;.-' -,- -"'--==-
r--
~__-1'V I J
/6:9' ---4--
I~II
I + I ---I-J I I I
I 9.,' I I I :
I
I I I I I I
I I I I :
I
I I i'
I I I ') , I
I "L.. ....J.. I I "L.. ....J.. I :
.. co I .. co
I IJ' I)
I I I
I r ( I :
<: I I I
...... I I I
{I. I ;-
CJ1 I I I
C) I I I
~ 0 I I I I
~ I lar I I 'af :
rr,: I I
I la~ I ~\. I
cy I I r~-----------i'ar I
I I
I I ~I
~ I +:
() T-- I
I I
~ ...... I \. ~ I III
C) I
~ I I II
C) I I I III
I .Ll 'v0 - -I"
C) ....J. I III
~ I .. co
'I I II
11:::. I , III
I~ I L
, I I
I 11'1
IIII
+ III
1III
a nl8.8 I III
-, ,aL IIII
,aL I
----t-.J I a WI
F-R 1-- I
"L.. ....J.. ~ "L.. ....J.. I Ii
.. co co co
+---
I
x
I
x
I
x
I
x
I
x
I
I ".~
x -
I
x
<: 0
I ......
{I.
CJ1
x "-v
I C)
-1l>.~ ()
x (Q ~
I rrf
x
I
x
I ·
~
~J' .p~
.... ~ t:;p .
I
I
I
I
I
L
~~'#'
~
I
x -------;-----~
\ +
x
-
---
~-----------
~-Pq
~~~
t:;p
8 $.
x
x
N7S'09'11''W
60.00'
Alley
(20,90' R-Q-W)
I
J.. '7'mJ..3ll'7'
SITE PLAN
118"=1'-0"
---------T----------------------------T----------------------------r-------------
. . .
.'--.-.~~-~.~..~...,
. . - -"--._-~
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
---
I
n1---
III
: ~------
III
11\
II
III
11\
: ~-----
:IL
lJ ____
flr--
III
III
III
"I
III
III _+
IlI-_____ I
III I
III I
III I
III I
"I I
"I I
III I
III I
III I
III I
~! -----,
'.,- I
III I
III I
III I
III I
"I I
III I
"I I
III I
III I
III I
III I
"I I
III I
III I
-m III I
~)>. II
. (Jl I I
7..... III I
\'!I!! III I
~ III I
!i III I
('J III I
; III .J _ I
~======---
I
~
-4
""'~'"
-
-4
~
~
!
I
I
~
~
..."
,..)
~
.;;
.
"<
I
..I;;
,
"
t.)
~(p
.0
.!.c:
,- -I
1'lI.
m
r
~
J:>
-I
2
____.__u_
, '
I I
I I '.
nr-------
\ ii \ I
: i\ i \
\ II i I
::i i I
III I
i [/ I
\ \1 i I
i Ii \ I
::i i I
III I
::1 II
III I'
UL-------
,
1
i~
L
~
D
to
D
D
,
/
D
D
D
10
,
/
--.,,'
-."../
----4
--4J
,
"""
_,_~",,"jf_
, ~. ~
~ .
j. ~
.
, , ---
~-------+- ~
III I
"I ,
", I
"I I
II, I ~
", I
I!i--------i
"I I
III I
"I I
, !i--------i
'II ,
"I I
III I
"I I
", I --4}
"I I
", I
III I
", ,
"I I
III I
I~-------t_
H I
III ,
III I
II' I --4}
III ,
II' I
II' I
III I
III I
III I
III .1 --.(t}
UJ---1:r---
II,
"I
II
II,
"I
II
II,
"I
N II
III
H. "I
7~ II
~m II, --.(t}
r III
m
~ II
-I II,
2 III
II
II,
ut-------
.)
Ilj
~~
,s
.
~.
'-""--~--<',--.,."-'"
-~.~~~".._...__...-II.-
,""':,.....
--
, , 1 , ~
,.-< ..
~
.- .
.;:
I I I
I I I
:r-------T--.
III I' ~,."j'
III ,
"I I
"I I
III I ~
II, I
III I
III I
III I
"I I
II
fI--------+-
H
III I
II' ,
III I
II' I
III ,
III I
III I -<t}
III I
HI I
fI--------+-
"I ,
.... II, I
~z "I I
III I
~~ "I I
' --f
~I: "I I
m "I I
r
m ", I
~ "I I
--f
~ "I I .,
~ -L' ,
-
------- -- ,
"-~
\'-.
~
~
~
~
.i
~
Q
"'1
I;)
"1\
i'\l
~
~
~
&
~
lA
Co
c.
.tI
B
~
i
-t.
...
~
~
t
%
I
~...,
-"
.,./
."-~".--~,._..~........",~-_.'_-,
VI {;ltJ OF TbklAh/I/ltjt::-;
BLOCK.
/...UOI{'Wfr DtSr ~JV
....~.,.'"
~
~
~
~
l.L
~
f
<::!
03
h.
tti
j}
ir
l;::!
<:>
~
~
t
'}
~
:;}
(
:t
~
~
h.
~
~
:>
,........
_,'p--"
~
:;
~
~
....
~
~
-
v-,
~
~
~
<
o
t;'
~
:t'
'<
~
\~
\l.
'C>
~
:::,.
[~ -.
?'
~
"
~
~
-
\Il
~
~
'<
()
c
!:
~
~
~
~
\lI
>
.
_//
,--~.
., II
~
~
~
\L
'"
~
~
5
I-...
~
~
~
2.
l
~
~
lB
~
u.
c
~
I.lJ
>
r
~
,."..,-~
':::j
l!-
e>
~
~
i iM';lR~Stat~' I: Fee S~
,.' ",~--""'-"~"'" ~~~~
,r;::: 1719 E~A~
I ; City
Permit lnformatoo ,
Master PeHN:
~~"J~~FjeIds :,~~~ ,~~~L:~~~}:~~j.Att~L~~tli$lOIY
PerrM *I 1OO-ro.20Q6,ASLU
AplISula r
s,...~l Zip ~~..
'"
~
z
9-
~
Routing Qooue f;'~kli~~~~'
slatusf~
Detcripticmj5 UNiT MUL TI-FAMIL Y STRUCTURE BUILD PER AMF REPLACEMENT---
GUIDELINES
SWnot.ed !zONE 4 544-3541 ClocklRunring DaY' i4
I.sued
Final
E""a, 107112/2007 ..J
0_
Last Name [71'9 E HOPKINS lie
Phone 1162G1705-I13E1
'r;;' Ownells Appticant?
F,~ N_IJOHN LAUDERBACK
PEN CO 81612
L"" N_lm E ;;oPiCiiiSi;:;:-'''---
Phone ~6261 ;005:.,38"--- Cut' #
First Name !JOHN LAU"D€RBACK - !POBOX 11&if..-""----~---~~-'-
. IASPEN CO 81612
I
L8StN~
Ph"""
Fifrt Name