HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sp.Clarks Market.A0687
(
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
~ '-' City of Al?,pen , 1"""f;;l7-37-073-SI-lJdl
~~TE RECEIVED: ,;;;../11/11"'1' CAS'E NO. 06A-.f7
DkTEiRECEIVED COMPLETE: STAFF: 'i/3
PROJECT NAME: f!jarl?,~ /'1orlfet SPA A-Inenol;ne.nf
,\PPL lCANT: (;lclf-l1l~ /-jeu-.t'fe f .
Applicant Address/Phone: 3<10 .N, ~IJ/ .I'1's,olJ? CI! 1i"/6// 6'"-8'040
REPRES ENTA'I'IV E: 70 In ClorJ7
Representative Address/Phone: <<;CUm-f?
Type of Application:
GMP/ Subdi v ision/PUD
1.
1. Conce pt ual Su bmi ssion
2. Preliminary Plat
3. Fi nal PIa t
20
12
6
$2,730.00
1,640.00
820,00
II. Subdivision/PUD
IV. All "One Step" Appl ications
5
$1,900,00
1,220,00
820,00
$1,490,00
$ 6 80 . 0 0
!.
2.
3.
Conceptual Submi'ss'i:on
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
14
9
6
III. All "Two Step" Applications
11
V, Referral Fees - Environmental
Health, Housing Office
(
1. Minor Appl ications
2
$
50.00
2. Major Applications
Referral Fees-
Engineering
Minor Applications
Major Applications
5
$ 125.00
.- 80,00
200.00
..__~... ..;:":';,..;,..:.'.i~..'I'. .i':'':'..f::'~:U~..: (I.: ;....,..,...
. '.-.....- ...--------------------- ----- -----------------------------, .~-_.._.._---
..-------------------------------------------------------------------
<]:&Z) CC
MEETING DATE: ~~~~ PUBLIC H~ING:'
DATE REFERRED: rfJ . ~ qY(rN IT IALS'f'pJ(/
YES
@
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
~RRALS:
, Ci ty Atty Aspen Conso!. S. D. _ School District
City Engineer Mtn. Bell _ Rocky l1tn. Nat. Gas
Housing Oil'. Parks Dept. _ StateHwy Dept (Glenwd)
Aspen ~Iatec Holy Cross Electric .Statellwy Dept (Gr.Jtn)
City Electric Fire Macshall V Bldg: Zoningjlnspectn
Envir. Hlth. Fire Chief Other:
_____ Roaring Fork Transit _____ Roaring Fork Energy Center
( ;;~~~=;~~;;~~7================~~;~=;~;~~7=lT~?~~~==~~;;~~~7=$=l~~
_ City Atty City Engineer L Building Dept.
Other: Othec:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: riIxf-' ()~
".- -~.
'-~
C la~_) /vio'((t!.J 5 p~ kMt:ll)iJ1e,d
t"."\
CASE DISPOSITION:
Reviewed by:
f,sJ!en P&Z
Ci ty Counc...J.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: On April 7, 1987, the Planning and
Zoning commission unanimously voted to grant the requested
special review for variation of food market square footage and to
recommend council to approve an amendment to the SPA plan for the
requested expansion subject to the three conditions listed below.
/
F:evie,",cc; By:
llSpeJ1 P&Z
(2:1' -~4
Dr, ArJ ~7,/1n uti Cv,;j<,1
approved the requested SPA amendment for the
expansion of Clark's Market retail space by 1,000 square
feet and reconfiguration of the loading dock, to a total of
18,000 square feet of commercial floor area, SUbject to the
fOllowing conditions:
"
1) The market does not expand its line of products into
non-food items;
2) The proposed loading dock alteration, not to exceed 529
sq. ft. in size, will be built prior to June 15, 1987.
Use of the space shall be restricted to loading dock,
receiving area and cardboard compactor uses; and
3) A pedestrian walkway from the eastern entrance into the
Trueman Building to the Mill Street sidewalk should be
demarked on the pavement. "No parking" signs shall be
posted to prevent service vehicles from blocking this
walkway."
,....,
.-,.,
MEMORANDUM
THRU:
Aspen city council
Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager fIJ-
steve Burstein, Planning Office ~
Clark's Market SPA Amendment
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
April 27, 1987
~===============================================================
SUMMARY: The Planning and Zoning Commission and Planning Office
recommend approval of the requested SPA Amendment subject to the
three (3) conditions listed below.
LOCATION: Trueman Building, Lot 1, Trueman Subdivision.
LOT AREA: 2.552 acres (111,165 square feet). Existing floor area
in total building: 47,000 s.f.
ZONING: Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Clark's Market requests approval of a 1,000
square foot expansion of floor area. This expansion exceeds both
the 15,000 square foot limitation in the Trueman SPA plan and the
use square footage limitation for food market set in section 24-
3.6 of the Municipal Code. The area has already been taken over
by Clark's. A building permit to add the space was issued based
on a misunderstanding of the planned use by the zoning official;
and the applicant has agreed to come in after the fact for the
appropriate reviews.
APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CODE: section 24-3.6 establishes the
maximum gross floor area of a food market at "12,000 square feet
with an additional 3,000 square feet permitted for storage and
accessory uses." The Planning and zoning Commission may grant a
special use approval for expansion above the limitation "when it
is satisfied that there are practical difficulties or unnecessary
hardship created by their street application, or that public need
and demand require an increased floor area for a particular
proposed use."
The Trueman SPA plan approved by City Council on January 10, 1977
constitutes the site specific requirements on the property.
After considerable discussion at that time, Council limited the
size of the grocery store to 15,000 square feet, reduced from the
requested 20,000 square feet.
~
,,.-,,,
section 24-7.9 establishes the requirements for amending an SPA
plan, requiring P&Z recommendation and Council approval for this
acti vi ty . The Trueman site is also subj ect to Ordinance 70
(Series of 1976) which set the zoning and some conditions of
approval, but the 15,000 square foot limit is not contained in
this Ordinance so it need not be amended.
PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Clark's Market already exceeds the 15,000
square feet limit on grocery and accessory space with the 2,000
square feet located in the basement, and 15,000 sq. ft. on the
main floor, totaling 17,000 square feet. The 1,000 square foot
expansion would bring the store operation up to 18,000 square
feet. Tom Clark has presented in his application the argument
that additional space is needed to provide greater variety of
food items and remain competitive with other markets in the
valley. It is stated that the market can utilize its space more
efficiently given the added retail bakery space. He has noted
how much larger are the supermarkets in Glenwood Springs, and
that, with the closing of Tom's Market, Aspen's market space has
actually decreased. For the purpose of comparison, we note that
City Market of Aspen has a total floor area of 15,700 square
feet, based on a special review approval by P&Z in 1980.
In 1977, city Council placed a limit on the market to keep the
scale of operation in proportion for a community the size of
Aspen. In addition, Council was concerned that there be a
balance between the NC and SCI uses in the total Trueman Building
project. Significant impacts of a market include: traffic
generation, parking, service vehicles (including semi-truck-
trailers, smaller delivery trucks and trash vehicles), employee
generation and potentially forcing specialty shops out of
business through size and dominance.
Expansion of Clark's Market by 1,000 square feet does not appear
to significantly change the scale of operation nor cause new
burdensome impacts on the community. As the expansion is
internal, no commercial floor area is added to the Trueman
Building. The 111 space parking lot for the Trueman Building
should continue to be adequate. The applicant has also stated
that no new employees will result from the expansion.
circulation for service vehicles has been identified as a problem
for the current level of Clark's operation. Service vehicles
stack in front of the store and along the east side, constraining
pedestrian and customer parking movement. According to the
applicant, supply service and trash hauling will not require
additional service vehicles because the "economy of scale" allows
a larger number of food items in the same number of deliveries.
A new loading dock set-up has been designed to alleviate problems
of delivery trucks stacking in front of the store. (See attached
"Scheme A"). The new loading dock would allow for two bays, one
2
("'.,
,-.,
of which may be used by smaller delivery trucks. A cardboard
compactor would be located on the loading dock, allowing Clark's
to recycle their cardboard. The reconfigured dock receiving area
would have dimensions of 23' x 23' (529 sq. ft.) and is consider-
ed mechanical space. However, no new FAR is added because the
area is already covered. In addition, the largest truck/trailer
fits inside the loading area, so there are no additional visual
impacts created. To further improve truck/pedestrian conflicts,
a pedestrian walkway from the Trueman Building to the Mill street
sidewalk should be demarked. The Planning Office supports this
improvement, planned to be finished by June, 1987.
Mr. Clark's arguments regarding marketing efficiency and the
community need for a larger operation at this time appear
reasonable. If the added space is used for food items only, as
contemplated by the applicant, then there should be even less
potential impact on other specialty stores in Aspen. We also
note that to the extent that Aspen's food markets are improved,
more shoppers can be expected to shop in Aspen and not drive down
valley just for food items. This is an auto-disincentive and is
another reason for supporting this request.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: On April 7, 1987, the Planning and
Zoning Commission unanimously voted to grant the requested
special review for variation of food market square footage and to
recommend Council to approve an amendment to the SPA plan for the
requested expansion subject to the three conditions listed below.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"Move to approve the requested SPA amendment for the
expansion of Clark's Market retail space by 1,000 square
feet and reconfiguration of the loading dock, to a total of
18,000 square feet of commercial floor area, subject to the
following conditions:
1) The market does not expand its line of products into
non-food items;
2) The proposed loading dock alteration, not to exceed 529
sq. ft. in size, will be built prior to June 15, 1987.
Use of the space shall be restricted to loading dock,
receiving area and cardboard compactor uses; and
3) A pedestrian walkway from the eastern entrance into the
Trueman Building to the Mill Street sidewalk should be
demarked on the pavement. "No parking" signs shall be
posted to prevent service vehicles from blocking this
walkway."
V'll, 'ri\\\\\r
3
I""'"
t"""\
CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATIONS:
~ CArlCWf-. ( a
no
SB.CLARK
4
,-;.,
r'\
CITY:;:,0E;ASPEN
, . . .' .., "~': . ,~.;~:r:' .
130so11thgalen:!::street
asp e~',' :colo r a do,>816 11
303-925 -2020
/!l/k7
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM
DATE SUBMITTED
./
FEES
$680,00
N~ Clark's Market
ADDRESS
300 N, Mill Street, Aspen, CO 81611
925-8046
PHONE
NAME OF PROJECT
Remodel 'of Upstairs Bakerv area
PRESENT ZONING
SPA
LOT SIZE
LOCATION
300 North Mill Stre~t, Aspen, CO
(indicate street address, lot and block number. May require legal
description. A vicinity map is very ~seful.)
CURRENT BUILD-OUT
sq. ft..'
units
A tt;lched
Attached
,
units'
sq. ft,
PROPOSED BUILD-OUT
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING USES
Superma'rket to include; Deli. Bakerv.
Meat, Produce. Floral, Readinq Center. Grocerv. Dairv. Frozen Food.
General Merchandi~e. Health and Beautv Aids.
DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL
Extention of ~x'~tin9 11~P~
TYPE OF APPLICATION
Amendment of S.P.A./Special Review
24-3,6
APPLICABLE CODE SECTION (S)
PLAT AMENDMENT REQUIRED
DATE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE COMPLETED
YES
__NO
ATTACHfmNTS: 1,
All applicants must supply Proof of Ownership in the form of a
title insurance commitment or statement from an attorney indicating
that he/she has researched the title and verifies that the applicant
is the owner of the property (free of liens and eucumbrances.)
2. If the process requires a public hearing, a Property Owner's List
must be supplied which gives all oWners within 300 feet in all
directions in some cases and adjacent owners in some cases.
3. Number of copies required (by code and/or in pre-application
conference.)
4,
Plat hy Re@iseered ~~rverer _
..~ . ,..
.IEO
N~
,
's
Area Breakdown
2,000 square foot Basement:
1;000 square feet Storage.
1,000 square feet - Compressor room, electrical room,
elevator and janitor room, employee breakroom, employee
restrooms.
15,000 square foot Main Level:
2,000 square feet checkout area and offices.
3,000 square feet preparation areas and coolers for
dairy, meat, deli, produce, frozen food.
10,000 regular sales area. ~
Percent Impact or 1,000 Additional Square Feet at Clark's Market
'-i
10% increase to current selling area, 6.6% of total
,main floor' area, ,or 5.9% of total grocery store space
> c\";, -" ., c .- ". ,',. , ", , ~"",." "'r ,-' :<:':,;~;:it~~1~:~~?~*:,}~wiL~~,~, ,:<,.,,:"';',\-<~:Yii1<~~b,;~,~'::~',~;;:,\:, {,:~~,~::1;
:~;}~;;,!,:~i:,,':4~,;~:~i~?;;:\~';;:7:: " ",:":' ",'"
,:~:,.,,;;\~Clark 1 s'Market vs., Total Shopping' Ce'Ilte
""""':::-">,\"':'~...,?~.,,~,:;.'. .--' "e,.,<.:, >~1::i::~;;:'~:".-<(':~:" , ". '.' . ".":" ,:.:"
" .. ",' Clark' 5 Market'currently;'pperatesout 'Of
total center. "This will increase ;,~6 .51.35%. ""
.'~" " <-.~;. ; "'.'::. ,,-,' . l'- ' ','--:-':,' ~';>;:!~:i,,",,',,"{: ,".,' ,"
, -:-, "'.+{",'(i<':,"',-'- . _",__:;,_" ,\:\. /",.c
. ',,'"f..
'. ~ .
("
FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE
Aspen Consumer Demands widest Possible Variety.
There remains ,a direct correlation between too little
retail grocery space and not having enough grocery variety. In
1984 the average store carried 15,379 items and in 1985 this rose
to 17,459. While industry figures are not yet available for
1986, I believe that another upward jump in variety will be seen.
Clark's carries about 14,000 items.
Particularly in Aspen the demand for new items and
expanded variety has never been greater. Not a day goes by that
a well traveled Aspenite or a new Aspen resident asks our store
to stock additional products they have purchased~in other areas.
We do our best to balance the addition of new items
with the fact that as we make space available for them, we are
cutting down the space we can devote to the more typical high
volume products. , ..
This request for an addit'ional ,000 square feet can
translate directly into approximately ,1, 00 new items ,and
expansion, of space on ,~mother 300,c,hronically out,-of-stock ,items.
" .'" I ,amcertaln ;:that wei,could:supply ;::the '. Planning and ',"
Zoning Committee" with ,:'several 'thousand signatures showing the
adamant desire fO:t"~xpanded grocery variety.' ,':<.:
Current Square Footage is a Little Too Restrictive
1. Industry Standards - New store size in 1985 was
40,000, squlire feet, 1984 was 39,600 square feet. Cllirk's Market
is 17,000 square feet including 2,000 square feet in the
basement. Clark's by any industry standard is a small market,
even with the addition of 1,000 square feet.
2. Approximate square footage increases vs. decreases
in the Roaring Fork Valley over the last three years.
A.Village Market in Snowmass expanded several
thousand square feet.
B. City Market in Aspen expanded 2,000 square
feet. City Market'in Basalt expanded 5,000 square
feet. City Market ,in Glenwood Springs expanded
20,000 square feet.
Super in Carbondale expanded 8,000
D.Total Glenwood Springs increases in grocery
space: Smiths +40,000, Safeway +20,000 to 42,000
square feet, City Market +20,000, Giant Foods at
42,000 closed 2/7/87.
F . Aspen's actual grocery square footage has
DECREASED with the closing of Tom's Market.
3. Since Clark's Market was opened in November of
1979, grocery sales have grown by approximately 20% to 30%. I
wish I could supply a more accurate number, but I only can
estimate grocery volume other than my own. More grocery shopping
has stayed in Aspen that once went to Basalt and Glenwood Springs
before Clark's opened. At the same time this increase in demand
has occurred, Aspen's total grocery square footage has actually
decreased as a result of Tom's Market Closing.
4. Upstairs bakery space was grossly underutilized
after "Pour La France" moved to their own bakery at the ABC. The
bakery was utilized exclusively for Clark's Market's customers.
The retail selling from the bakery space was discontinued and all
products were sold in the grocery store. ,We. then consolidated
alJ,bakery iprOducj;ion in,theb~sementarea,aridhave .notbaked
upst~irs .in,'Cibout;it;hreeyears .;'-t11e JlpstairsBak:~ryhasbeenused
a~<(ll:>reacl;~li.p+Il~~oom,offi~;~":"-~~,~~~f~ge. ,,: n~~:tualit,Y the,
.'..~~~~r,~f~~l~~i0~ii!~~!~f~~L~.~.~i~0~.~.;,3.~:.~;.;.':',t~~*~~~10~;I;S/S~,:: ,.ii' ;,;,;~~....,.'..,: ..'....,."'i ;i<"".'i' ,..'" "
;:'<<,5 .r;:it:,Salesper square footare.so,h~gh in Aspen that
maintaining variety and stock levels is very difficult. In 1984
the average store had a sales per square foot of $8.00. In 1985
this rose to $8.43. In Aspen there are times when we will do
,over twice that 'amount per square foot. To Clark's Market an
additional 1,000 square feet would help immensely in our effort
to provide products at all times of the year to our customers.
Minimal Impact on Aspen "Size" Considerations
1.
No additional
footprint.
The additional space was already existing space.
commercial space has been added. No additional
2. 1985 Total store size of new store construction
was 40,000 square feet. The average store in the U.S. is now
33,600 square feet, roughly double "the size of Clark's Market.
To all visitors, our store will continue to seem quite small in
scale.
3.
and will have
pollution.
I
Increased space will not require anymore employees
little negative effect on traffic density or
-2-
'-",
4. ' The use of the space is a legitimate one and is
authorized by the current S.P.A.
5. We do not believe that this expansion will be
precedent setting to the degree that control of overall grocery
space will be lost. This expansion is into existing contiguous
'space. It visually has no effect from the outside of the
building and really has only a small effect inside the store. It
is only a matter of expanding from 15,000 to 16,000 square feet
on the main level. I hope it can I be considered as such and not
looked upon as a possible 40,000 square foot Supermarket threat.
No further retail sales area expansion is contemplated by Clark's
Market.
We also would hope that this application will be
viewed in the context of an S.P .A. zone. The imp'lication is that
your committee has certainflexibili ty in this zone without
affect on other zoned areas.
(
6. We also do not believe that this expansion will
adversely effect other'small businesses in town. The increased
space will be used for food products only. The space that is
vacated in other areas of the store will s-erve to add additional
food and pet supplies.' ,We do .not.,contemplate..the ,addition 'of any
. " .,:1 \;<,.,' ",'." '; ',!\;,<,." " _'. ""'~;'<"':, ,._,' '''',_ ,,"
non-food h.nes as a result pf ,th~sexpans~on. ~>,Much of the space
will used increase,stoc'C""'" tems currently 'stocked in ,the'
':~ t:,\;{:~:6;':ij:t~:[C1r;~;~f;l~~:~: ' ", ) " ;';' ""'~,' :~~,:.',~':~:.'->~,t:~'~fe1,:\~~!,~::!/,~>:,j?<~ :~~ ~~~ti~,:'~':<8':'; ~':: ': ;;.:"<'::~~~' ',': ::' <~~~t '
. ""',','.
-.-'
,
. ';4- '
?'
-3-
The basement area was for 2,000 square~feet of storage,
but ,about half of that was eaten up by the employees'
breakroom, restrooms, elevator room, electrical room,
and compressor room.' ' .,,>/,,'>/,:,,,
~,:::,~':;"i,',:>,:",~, " }<,,:,:-:::. {i;,~';:;\,~L; " , ' "
" All.baking was consolidated ,inthe,:,;basement area and
.,the <upstairs area was turned f~Ilt:q~~~p:ffice, bakery
.', packaging, and storage. _: .:; '!,;:..":,~,:t:;/3'fiJi!ig,'t
"",1g,?'lf~,~",:""ki:0:;;" .,\""":,,\{~ i " ,,:,:, "1,'::.,.' "', . /;;;;;::i4i'''C,
d,"" ~,< " ":' ,:.:.~, :.-.~" . ' /",';
'\; Clark's Market 'got "a "building permi t',.to ,takethe,wa
::,;;;rout,,;b~,t,~een.~hegroCerysto:re _,~n.c1,}~pe ::bakery, 'b~f,~id
'.t~,:~:not;:do:Ltbecauseof a problem ',W:LthtJim Trueman. -':
, ;,y:~.X :,~ '~>::;;':'~:~1~*I.~~~il::;;;':~J/t.;::;:yt',;':'~;::,,:' ,;' ,<,,',~~ ',::>':~>":::"'i' : i "-'-:':'::. " :: ~;~~:" "::/~:rrd;~ r\~r': . ;' :.", ,':. .i~))~~if.'
" Clark's. Market was reissued a building permit I' 'but
Trueman stopped construction again.' ::
~e 'agr'eed to revent the D~li exhaust and to quit
carrying rental videos and VCR's and in return Jim
Trueman allowed us to do the consolidation of the
upstairs bakery ,and Clark I s Market. We made some
changes in the construction plans and for the third
time, got a building permit.
1976
1983
1984
"0';",-
;-;/s;-;~>:
1985
1986
BRIEF HISTORY OF CLARK'S MARKET AND BAKERY SPACE
Council restricted Clark's Market to 15,000 square feet
main level and 2,000 square feet in the basement.
Actually because of the need .for office, checkout, ,and
meat/deli/produce/productionareas as well, as
frozen/dairy/produce/deli/meat back room cookers, the
selling area of Clark I s Market is only about 10,000'.
January we completed construction and almost
immediately we were in trouble with P&Z.
During the -last two years, we have tried on several
occasions t,o determine whether or not space restrictions were ,
actually imposed on the Market. While we allthought they were,
we could not find them on the final platt or'in the minutes we
read from the Council meetings. As usual, ,,' the restriction was
found immediately after we finished construction. '
,-,; , ';":.';:"";"""
1987
Planning
Please realize that we agree wholeheartedly with the
and Zoning process and we firmly believe if it were not
, " ' ".'i ' ;' :.^,,:" :<<~'j?>~}f~t,_,z.~'/,,'",~,,/,';-
<:';-,<~,j .. '-.-, ,;,'"
~ ,\,', ".
:'T;!~'
,.,\~,' ':':">r:, ':<",; :;:'"
,:"'-'
,{",,:':,
'1'i' ,',,',
;:":_:':':~,:f::::,'- '\'r":,:~",
, '" "_:;:;;~;')';,::;:'
,-",,-,',Y'.
,/..',' ~::>;, -~"
, ;"4-'-
'-'
.' . ,"e:,:;,::":-
\,"
:",,;,:,"::
",,,
'1,,:', ":';:~'i":"',:'-"':
\ '-~:- ':' .
","-'.->
".:'""
.~" ,;--
1"""\
1"""\
for this process, Aspen would be full of large chain stores, and
Clark's Market would not even exist.
We sincerely hope that you will approve our amendment
to the S.P.A. We will cooperate in any way possible.
SinC?~
J. Thomas Clark
,,-.,
^
i.<
i-':
I ~_
i,--
i:=;',
i1u
:.:) Cr
... -,";:;", ~'
- (s~, .' -
. ....,~. .
!
~I
~I
;i~
&l~
. 'il
~
U
o
o
CI
2
-
o
c(
o
...
I-
W
~
II
c(
~
~
~
'~L'"
! &:,"-
~ ~
I: '
" ..~ '
", ~
-' -~, '
i ..~::
, ~"
,!.._ lD
'i - ,
i ,'I, ~ j,
_-'-'..-- II
, ---"c( ~
... '
u <l
'--~--' :..
I! I!
,~
?
~'\,l~
f(
7.'
i) :
I
t
~
i
i
i
,'__.. c
.-..,--
--I
1
I
Ii
'I
,
,
i
I
~
<t
.\\'\
r
~i
~!
1
,
\ '
I
I
~
~-~
...-
,,_I~
!~
~
~
~, -'-'
~
=,;..-
;;.::--
'(-..
_".h.
. -"
>~lF"l~,:,' ;
, ~, ' t~] ,n.
1=,
_Ii
,J
I
I
!
, I
I,
... '"
t"-
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
steve Burstein, Planning Office
,
RE:
Clark's Market SPA Amendment/Floor Area Special Review
DATE:
April 7, 1987
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
LOCATION: Trueman Building, Lot 1, Trueman Subdivision.
LOT AREA: 2.552 acres (111,165 square feet). Existing floor area
in total building: 47,000 s.f.
ZONING: Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Clark's Market requests approval of a 1,000
square foot expansion of floor area. This expansion exceeds both
the 15,000 square foot limitation in the Trueman SPA plan and the
use square footage limitation for food market set in section 24-
3.6 of the Municipal Code. The area has already been taken over
by Clark's. A building permit to add the space was issued based
on a misunderstanding of the planned use by the zoning official;
and the applicant has agreed to come in after the fact for the
appropriate reviews.
APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CODE: section 24-3.6 establishes the
maximum gross floor area of a food market at "12,000 square feet
with an additional 3,000 square feet permitted for storage and
accessory uses." The Planning and Zoning Commission may grant a
special use approval for expansion above the limitation "when it
is satisfied that there are practical difficulties or unnecessary
hardship created by their street application, or that public need
and demand require an increased floor area for a particular
proposed use."
The Trueman SPA plan approved by City Council on January 10, 1977
constitutes the site specific requirements on the property.
After considerable discussion at that time, Council limited the
size of the grocery store to 15,000 square feet, reduced from the
requested 20,000 square feet.
section 24-7.9 establishes the requirements for amending an SPA
plan, requiring P&Z recommendation and Council approval for this
activity. The SPA Agreement Ordinance does not state the size
limitation and, therefore, need not be amended.
PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Clark I s Market already exceeds the 15,000
square feet limit on grocery and accessory space with the 2,000
"
("""'\
("""'\
square feet located in the basement, and 15,000 sq. ft. on the
main floor, totaling 17,000 square feet. The 1,000 square foot
expansion would bring the store operation up to 18,000 square
feet. Tom Clark has presented in his application, the argument
that additional space is needed so to provide greater variety of
food items and remain competitive with other markets in the
valley. It is stated that the market can utilize its space more
efficiently given the added retail bakery space. He has noted
how much larger are the supermarkets in Glenwood Springs, and
that, with the closing of Tom's Market, Aspen's market space has
actually decreased. For the purpose of comparison, we note that
City Market of Aspen has a total floor area of 15,700 square
feet, based on a special review approval by P&Z in 1980.
In 1977, city Council placed a limit on the market to keep the
scale of operation in proportion for a community the size of
Aspen. In addition, council was concerned that there be a
balance between the NC and SCI uses in the total Trueman, Building
project. Significant impacts ofa market include: traffic
generation, parking, service vehicles (including semi-truck-
trailers" smaller delivery trucks and BFI vehicles), employee
generation and potentially forcing specialty shops out of
business through size and dominance.
Expansion of Clark's Market by 1,000 square feet does, not appear
to significantly change the scale of operation nor cause new
burdensome impacts on the community. As the expansion is
internal, no commercial floor area is added to the Trueman
Building. The 111 space parking lot for the Trueman Building
should continue to be adequate. The applicant has also stated
that no new employees will result from the expansion.
circulation for service vehicles has always' been tight for the
current level of Clark's operation. According to the applicant,
supply service and trash hauling will not require additional
service vehicles because the "economy of scale" allows a larger
number of food items in the same number of deliveries. Tom Clark
will present a new loading dock set-up designed to alleviate
problems of delivery trucks stacking in front of the store. ' (See
attached "Scheme P-i") .
The new loading dock would allow for two bays, one of which may
be used by smaller delivery trucks, and would make room for a
cardboard compactor. The expanded dock receiving area would have
dimensions of 23' x 23' (529 sq. ft.) and would be considered
additional accessory space of the market. However, no new FAR is
added because the area is already covered. In addition, the
largest truck/trailer fits inside the loading area, so there are
no additional visual impacts created. The Planning Office
supports this improvement, planned to be finished by June, 1987.
Mr. Clark's arguments regarding marketing efficiency, and the
2
...
~
.~
community need for a larger operation at this time appear
reasonable. If the added space is used for food items only, as
contemplated by the applicant, then there should be even less
potential impact on other ,specialty stores in Aspen. We also
note that to the extent that Aspen's food markets are improved,
more shoppers can be expected to shop in Aspen and not drive down
valley just for food items. This is an auto-disincentive and is
another reason for supporting this request.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends the Planning
Zoning commission to approve the requested special review
recommend to Council approval of an SPA amendment for
requested additional 1,000 square feet of Clark's Market
mercial floor area subject to the conditions that:
and
and
the
com-
1) The market does not expand its line of products into
non-food items; and
2) The proposed loading dock alteration, not to exceed 529
sq. ft. in size, will be built prior to June 15, 1987.
Use of the space shall be restricted to loading dock,
receiving area and cardboard compactor purposes.
SB.CLARK
,
3
'.. :C;,;" ::'>',
',,"'
,~
..-,
D @,,' @,',".,~o\Wrg,l~
lIB I 11981 lUll
I ,', jllJ)
CITY""J" . SPEN
' ",..\, :,'::,'i,t "~\
" , ""':"::: '::':"':<":"f<:i'"":'~' ... ~;;;?" ,;",:' ";.'....J ~<,:;;:. : .
'130~out ga enlihtreet ""
'~;..,:'''' " ,,, '~"-;'f'" ':'~,,:"> ;\~,'~~:~~~,) ~."~~~/:'
: ',a s p ejl';l,cQ to:r;,~d:(C 8161
; :.'1?303:9{5~2g20')' ' '.
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM:" ',1,/" , :' >)'iF;~~i~~:';""" DATE SUBMITTED
,',', '
,,':-:",,"'-',,-':.;:' "';".,'
-- , ' " ""'-":'::::':'7
~/;~It;7
$680.00
..
i"
'. ~ "'.
, ',' "":~''::, "."~(:',o:>+:~~::;::'1:": ,,~:,.,,>,
300 N. Mill Street, Aspen,'CO 81611
FEES "
NAME
, ADDRESS
Clark's Market
;Pt~; :~~i{i~t'~f!,i:,~\~"
\
I
.,'.:""
PHONE, '
925-8046
NAME, OF PROJECT
, ,:,~,;' \~:: ':: <<~<~&!r~J.>_j> "\ ;':;, "
Remodel of' ~pst,airs Bakery
, '; ':,',j- :~~!}~~::' ~!~L~~~i~~tt~~i\<:.F~,::'.y"
"
area
,PRE5ENTZONING
SPA
:,".:':,,::
. I" ": " '}~'
.,7 ;,' >~kt',;:Y::~;i1:~::"~>:
")',
LOT SIZE'
LOCATION
, "';'~ ':{0,,;';~p;~\**:;~t:~~~'~'~~\l;,:~;',':":
300 NorthMill~street,'''Aspen, CO
(indicate street "address;;i\:lot', and block number.
description.: A, v;t."i!li):,)i;, map:,:is, very \,seful.)
::::::::::~m :::::::: ~~~:
", '-;::;};/i,~: ;~~~~~~'~:,':;:j::'~~<>(":
May req~ire legal
units
units
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING USES Superm~r~E;lt to include; Deli. Bakery.
,- .:.,' , '- ':..,,:, ;,,~i:,' :;','i:,:;~:,(~'~~,t':~;*1?;~(.tF\'<\>'-:ii
Meat, Produce. Floral, Readinq' CenteE): Grocery. Dairy. Frozen Food;
" :.. "::;:i~~';K7~:, :>4{J!ff{~~!f!:Mjji/
'General Merchandise. Health and'Beauty Aids.
'. <t-'> >-"", ;"i~}~~~~'~~;Xi':l"':'"
~"',~'~f."-":_<f"'1,~-~~~~7~;,,,,'.',,,, '.' ,
,f,:~::;'i{;Z,)~?:~\2",:;::~,;: ';X:;'
. ,'''-:;,<' r"~"<,,,, ~"s; ,,' . ".-,,)., "
,,,,-...' ,:';':,,"'."',
/,
DESCRIPTION OF, LAND USE PROPOSAL
";;~;:\~~'4;i~~;:~f
existinq URP-~.
.' {~'~~;,:':~;:t~~~;A:~tt;;~~~;:i);:,:'~
".',;.- "..;,-;,
';::,;:>.!,'::;)j,1':-.?:i,(.:,;:'~;;"J.:':i-h.*'W!/:!t:.t?~:i,;! '
". ..t,:,;: . ./'; '.;' :!,;>~~ .
'. - ',"'.... ~ ,.;; . '. .
'" .:::./: ~~. ..<.~>:' .. .'
TYPE, OF APPLICATION
,,'
,":" ',," .-,' ,,,' J,;'''-,i,' :":'ii'A,/,~",,,t)-, ~~~c~i1:',";,~'~"""
'..., ,,< Amendment":of S. P .A ./Special
h'l '!"2'4'~:3''';6'\~i!.~~~{''
,APPLICABLE CODE SECTION (5) , ' ''''''"'" ''','h
Review'
",\.
'.""',}'
>"':--';'c';':" .'
';,0"
. '" ' "~::, '.;~;:h~}{iG(r0;y,;:,(i:' , ',W '
All applicants "lI!ust: supp,lY'jProof of Ownership in the form of a
title insurance/,c.ommil;m~nti'ror~statement from an attorney indicating
"that he/she ,hasiresear,c.hed,:jl:;he" title and verifies that the applicant
is the' owner,: of :,the;;;1l"oper,ty:: (free. of liens and eucumbrances.)
, " ,-' ,,:',: ^:',~' ,> ::',>'.::,;~L~':.\;:\r<YT :;:' ':i.'~~':"~',,:~::';l;~;:?::~::{4:,yt*;t,<;;~\<',::,: -';:' :<":, ,;:::',,:",:', - "., ,
'If the p,rocess':req'ui~e~:a."),p~R,lic hearing, a Property O'Wner's Ull
:>.must..be, suppliec\""w~i.c)lJl..g:!r:v~,~,~';al1,ownel:'S ,within 300 feet in ,all "
"directi.o~s,,:in some'"c~13e~'!and ,adj acent "owners; in some cases. '
. '!<''''''~',;_:~'v "' :' ;.~.; ",.
, Number' of copies,l.'re~uir,~4,: (by, code and/or in pre-application
conference,~) " \~.,,,\ <r>~;;; " ''',:J;
"""C"",j "",.
,._NO
"^',,
','. ,PLAX AMENDMENT REQUIRED ,'"
DATE PRE~APPLICATION CONFERENCE, COMP~ET
.' .-'
':':c;,,""';:
. ,:,:;",,:::'-:> ,
t,,',,"":''--'-'
4.
Plat by Registered Surveyor
Yes
No
--------
, ' ,
. ',. .
.' ,"', ,'.
'Current Floor Area Breakdown'
2,000 square foot Basement:
1;000 square feet Storage.
1,000 square feet - Compressor room, electrical room,
elevator and janitor room, employee breakroom, employee
restrooms.
15,000 square foot Main Level:
2,000 square feet checkout area and offices.
3,000 square feet preparation areas and coolers' for
dairy, meat, deli, produce, frozen food.
10,000 regular sales area. ~
.,,\ '
. ' . ~", _), :'~'<':7:,', ,." - : >:,.' " "
10% increase to current selling area, 6.6%
main floor area, or 5.9% of total+.grocery store space.
Percent Impact o'f 1,000 Additional Square Feet at Clark's 'Market
,,'-'.",' ",,'.
~ -\':.'.' :+,'/:;:':' :~v:'.; ',., ."~_,,
,of 'total
:";',,:\",:i:ir~;::~:~b';~'i~!f~':~,;>;~C< ':,.,' ::i'
''''''".;
.i'.:"., ,;~ 'C";'.
',,",V:;,, : ""', "
"
I'~ ,",
"''','
,::; .,:::,:': ""
,;".: ',:->':--::".' .:<:~..(,:,:, ."
"..' '.~~,::': ::" :'; ':.' ;'~ ': .,
, .,
, '. . , '; "~~~. ",(:
Market ys. ..,'.l'otal~Shoppirig Center
," "
currently,~pperates out of 45.9% of the
increase ,to 51 ~35% ',.",..,,-,
"
~v
'c,.,
>'i.'o< '<',
<."','::',-,
,
'i
.....'
r
>;,\,'" . ",:-"
"'A<;~
:/:,)~'~";,;N:ii;,;,';;1%f~'.;.'{ ,,' ': y,;, :"
,;:,,',',!:,/ >' ',' ,
";-"
',' FOOD llfARKETlNG FACTS
",l"~.(J..,~,tt:>:~ ",'I~""( "''J$'l!&i'''''J~-"~::\H-~'YY~\-'-'!;~ "-"', ' "
" "'Jc; '",. "'IP ~ '!i;'J:, Sr4it-ti,':?~>' 'I ,'~. ~ ~ix ,y.'ii;.;l' S0iH;{. \ ""~1l(~1,"';;(;"W'3~'tl~') '~/"~* );;:i < "'~"'~;..'~ 'ir.f~ }e ~
., "'; '. . I Data and statisticS' for 1985 't ';.' ):
,
,; ','" ':,
,-.,'.'
," ',.-:,,: ,-"'.
....','/" -,,'
~",,:' -, '- ..
c,"'"
.'~ .. c> .
,~:':i/ '
. ,t\.-;::'y,<:~' "
':",i" ",/,_-")""~
;(\' ,/, ,_." ," .
'f..;'::..",'-:
"'.';'
,,' , ,~, -" - ','
,
',':
, Total grocery stores
Number of employees
Total grocery Sales
Tptal supermarkets (over $2 million in annual sales)
Total supermarket sales
154,000
2,3 million
.
$292,2 billion
30,505
$209,8 billion
Source: Progressive Grocer. Annual RepOrt, 1985
Net profit after taxes (1985)
Average weekly sales per supermarket
Average size of new store built in 1985
Averagenurnb~r of items iI1~superrhiirket
1.19 percent
$206,543
40,000 square feet
17,459
.. '-'''''~,',"''''<'''i':':r''-'_':':-:'''';'>'' :"'>,';
Retail sales gain over 1984
:i;::,:?:t,',;::/:
':{:'Z!';;;.~->;":0<~::-
" _i",c\,'.. ",.-:--.,;~, __",:
.,-~':"
:C"-
. ',' :;:')'(' :;":,:::::~;A;~li:5:0%.\~.~~i~',;'~kg:: >.,);~"r ,(,"0;;, 'J~/~::;
;;:;frO%',!~;':\;:,;,;/:r":bt '
:~i/~i~:~:}'~f"'$8~4'3 ': :i'~~V.~\'~~~<~~/b<:::;Y} ,:i:/;.r:' .
Wh~l~~~:":~~~gai~iL'bV~r --1'984:' ):~i~tf'~\Yiif,:,;~~~~tjA::\;;ti!j.~ft~;}~:.
SaleS p~ labol' hour
Gross margin with warehouse
Gross margin without warehouse
....
};,C:':';':w'" ':- '%':'<kl'~'j~lt:%~saI'iJ';~:"~10}~~/1~~ii#~~Jt~~{~:i~'~" "',-' :-;<. '~';,;:tj:i~~i~~,:i:~~~,\:;f~':1~~~W10';t,_"~~~~;j)ttW::t< .
, ee y es per square oot ""'" ...",..... :1" .., ,.....", ."..., ,
, " """ '- ,', '" -," "',", '-"," ' ," ___ ". . ....,'..c. .~,
, .:~ ';'&l~~p~~;;;~ri~ttrii~iti=~ti6~';'~":;:" :, ):'~~;:':~;:,~~'C;4~~1;~:~~i~:t~~1~;~S~:
$16,33' ';::,F'-
."....
.<'>ii~~~~~'$88:80:'c'::~,0~~4:;1~~,~~:~~~;:!_:~,J1~~
.
-',~' ': -.
,,-,":t~i
24,0%
'.
Source: "The Food Marketing Industry Speaks"/FMI
These operating results are typical of FMl's member supermarkets. They represent
average performance based on data from a cross-section of our membership,
FOOD MARKETING INSMUTE
The Food Marketing Institute (FMI) is a nonprofit association that conducts programs in research,
, education and public affairs on behalf of its 1,500 members-food retailers and wholesalers and their
customers in the United States and overseas. FMl's domestic member companies operate more than
17,000 retail food stores with a combined annual sales volume of $150 billion-half of all grocery sales
in the United States: More than three-fourths of the FMl's is composed of independent
supermarket operators or small regional firms. Its international includes more than 150
members from 40
..
-:-!i' "~.
SOURCE: Food Marketing Institute
SOURCE: Food Marketing Institute
, Average Weekly Food
, . S~ore Sales
SOURCE: Food Marketing Institute'-
,-', ':::~.,,'
" .'.",',0""
,'''.
thirds of all stores clOsed in 1985 were conventional stores,
25 percent were super stores and 8.4 percent included
combination stores, warehouse stores or ~'other,"
Slightly more than 70 percent of all supermarkets were'
leased from outside companies and 8 percent were leased
from a subsidiary or parent company. The cost for rent
, a new store was, on average, $6,20 per s<Juare foot while
the cost o/renting an existing structure was $4,34, And
:, .'. ~.:' ''';,,/.~ ' '<(>;;~::_' ,-,';','" "". , < . ,- ,
/J>.....:'/""...;, ;,.-- ,;;;,. ,:""",,',
" --" ,~. -.,''''';------ -"- ,
.;" '~'i/'~;;':C.~~:. '_:~~~~~i:~\:-:
..
. , : "f\'~~:~:'t~:
<, "~':'o:;:,::~i~::'l':
SOURCE: Food Marketing Institute
for the first time, FMI tracked the percentage of stores
, which were acquired from another company,F~r.1985,
this was 2,3 percent. . ". .;,','" ~:;:';-~:;'7:Y"';:;';:, ";
, ',.' "'.'. ' _, ': .. "":",.""t<;i'f'B".~,.,~",, '. '.
The square foot cost for remodeling a store waS typical-
ly $17,00 in 1985, with a range from $6.95 to $24,00. The '
total cost for a mllior.remodeling typiclllly.ex~eeded
, $400,000. "\Q:j~;~t;,:~iY;ftf~,~i;~0~;:/~~~';ii?~+~~~:;(.~}?,i~:~tp~~~%~:.>t~,~j,;,~;:. 'J~!;'::':
Supermarkets got younger in 1985, Store opernng and
'; ':,:.,;:::: ,,:., 'b;~~' . .:'~,t'.,;-- ',,,~',,, ->~\\~;M~~t~1{E;~~~:::;\ .
^, .", '+,-,:\_:;:-i):<'" 'Y~'"':' -;-.- "'r"""::_':-"~':'-,_h'"",_ -, i' ""~>>
"Yi"f;, , '?1~;~';A,'\;'U':i%CAf;:~i~:~:
, .','> ,'''-''; ",>' .,:,+::~'j~:' ; -:;,:}<:"
' '.. ",.," .t,:~"L.~,::,',',~,'~,,"':' ,""'::".' ,7 "'c;,', 'C",'" "'~J~\' ",'.,'
.', .c'., 'i7-Y!"?'- .:,:',:';:'::~/;~,:,,;,.".... ....~: ;~<'.."~::-' _,' p',
'" ,',', '"...., "0 ".." . f:" GJ :.: >,' '~"~", ,,0 8 't1 -::- ... ... CLl~ !! _,...;..
c.; ",m ,"':',' = ..., --,-."Ao) = _ ..,... ... C a)
~. i:" = C+"c to! .... e ,;"',": as ~ as.,- 0 <:> (I,)
'" '0 0.1:: 1IS,\f"C<;:lrJ lIS 'at: "o:~'o .,
@ ~ '"d a ::'::.~,: 0 \:,~ m" 0 ,g tIO &"CLl'Z e :.
;g.;~ b:' ~ 8 a ~ ~~ .~Ul, ~ ~"t:l t;'
~ ,::; 0 ,':':'-:..,~ t;:: ::::. to H ~ as ~.~.s ;- g
; ~~s..$ I:: "lil.g..s .:..1:101; :rl
"" ~~-'~Ol:;"'"iil""'o.8~
.<: >"~,.. '"'..- >'^;s-..
"'.."" -tIC ]",~o~Q;'=Cil",""
I.!'~! - .. -l!l,~.. .. lIS I:: '" ~
' '" ,~oOl ~ ~ o':':-o;:::.~ !::
"'~ ;..t:'" co C)""C~'''''''." _~...... Q)
"'a Q) rtJ a2.... Q,)....." ':;; d'tcl...~.bO
.: ~J: :is ~ ~ II) ~ ~ ~ as"'t:S'~ as J::: f Cii f
ll>~~- ll>'" 0'-'" ",,0=0
.,~ &B; fG~ td CD ;~j ;~~.!a~
S .. ..:=: ~ '" ~ :;:: 6' ~ E s ~:E ~';a ~
bo6'~ l5:os ::3 ~ ~ ,8 g 'C' '" :l lIS :l '.: 1l '><
= 8 0 l:l ~ '" 'S .:$ ""- 'a "" '" "S1
~ctS~~ "aj g~ "d~-:+a.;;r=~ ~;$
'~!3vbo';?"t:l gjl::~ '" $:U IISS &; "':5:!::
,..Q_ ~ d s:q~'" 1IS"t:l0l"" >. "'C' a
v H" lIS 0 ". I:: '" 'bo 8 ::> j:;
] a ~;.; bo . 6 ~ ~ '" ~.a: 1>;-E <;:l '-" 8-
OS"",,'" I::e",l:l '~"'"<l:lQ,.{;I::"t:ltl;..
.. g ..,!l'~ 21 0.8:E g;: 1::"1: I::~.~
.ca..c:....::= o"tJQCl -....ep ~p,.asc$"'I":"I
g.+aio =aa8 ~Q)>,'-:'t~iG Sf
.. 4l lIS Ol '; ~"~ '" ~ !! 8 ~ "t:l 'g g!
..,e"os::o ~o.. .<:...- '''=0 C'
C..c +a..... ..c...,.~ ~ ~ ~ S..a as bel ~
CI:S+aCDGlI 0.1"
"">'':'" ~"~-.. O"~
... ... as .... C Qi: ai .... CI:S ;: CD c: i:t bO-' . ." "'tII.' tII H". a
;~a....Bo.... e"'~oo=Ol~=I:::S1:: .~IISOlo
gj .8 .. 1O.,.? ;g,~ "'~ 8. "g co 8 0 ~ .; 'S a '" lIS "'2:E ~ ~ 1: :g
.s"t:ll::",t- -"'", ..:::..iilOl lIS "'III 0 _I ... '"
"'= ~ o"'...~ '" ",..", .....
~ os.... "r~ 0 8'" :It ^ 8 ~ - "'.", "S1.. 'I::
'<:;,g ,w... ;:;- :=,QQ,.g;~Pl"'i:l:~IIS/la;~B:lO ~
caClS'Q...... Q,) as"Q>' ~.... oPe- OO"41Q,)Q,)'~ "8-~i~
~ ~ s:l. ~ .. '5] lIS ... ~ .8:IJ.s 0:'<: .. ~i i i:l: .. ~:s t"~ a~.
.. I:: '" 0 I:: bo lIS .s = .. 011 0 '. "'.., .8' >. 0.. _.. "" ....
8:~~:Z: .S: S::"C"t:l"'.s ::a!;j,gig.s..>.~"']!;allG.82"ai!
fUlD~"tJ_ ~ ;a~Q,)5UJ ,..c:c..c ....;;tlJof:;1U.~S=.sjC _Ql....j3
","tl ...... .. :l'~~,,0l ...~ - IIS"",-",,,, "" ""C
..t:: GO d 0 GO':I ... u E'c CI:S.u CD l) >"::: 4:: ~ ~..8 0 s:I. ... g as a::l =
oW as 0 -... S s:: q) ~..Q J.o Q,) Q,) t ~'Q::I if "tJ as .... as -;.$ ~._
s:: '-...:~ ::: .....~G.l 8(1) UJ~~ iij O"'~ "t1 ~ fDc.I (,t';
"- as toO. .... 0) ... '"' ~ ' := Q,) CI:S tro ........ ... "tJ Q,) a: ~ Q. ..... : _ as
"C f ,!!l.!! .... t' .5:::: '" = S ,., ",1:J '(l g.- ~ = ,>..8 a.8 ~ '" t s::
'" co 8 """" Ill'" <II,1:J lIS 0 co ~. .<: " 0 '" t .. '.' III i3 "'... c b
-:;; ., s 2 "" .. 'I: tf- ... :;:: 0' ;.:; 13 '" g.~ :a;: I! t' ",.. ~ ",.:g 01>.
.. ;1 0._ 0 g ,"0: 'I: Ol ;t ~ a.. 1l. .....t:: os to bo Q 0.<: ... Ul _ ,., Q,
o ... ... "'.,. '..... '<3_"..t::", '" ~ '- ~ Co Q,~ .. 1O.Q :::; ~ .. 'S 1:: .= co .<:
g.,u .... "'" -0 _ G:l 0 :J C.l 0'" ... ca S"O '"' a: 1::= III
!;1IS;tO.,; eOli5"~~ "CgUl... '1ISt:....."'.. "lilO'llG
UClo_GD... as "(1 :()-t:lO c"'-e ast;:;t'i:l:..cas.... ."alla, .=~'"
.E'5s~o '" "COUl iii", I:: lISeijj"8Qi.-:.8....OlllG'S~,!l ].....'<3.&1
.,... to 8';'; ,0' ""c ~ .. ~:&I '" .... '" c: f 8 t:: o. iil lIS ~ ::I i:i
,1:J 0 - - "" Ul 8..,~ ..... ;t = 0: '..s 0: 0 0 0'l3 Ii, :IS s:: ~C5 Cl 2:
~ - Gl S l8 !l Ol 0 '" Ol 0 >;.. 0 >.'~... {; ~ ' I'! C _ _ I::
=s;.~O)'" <<II 0 --Q,)+.loQ" *iUJ..a"'t:SbIl..&::..c::'Qtms:::ut!i3as 'iC~=~
cu.... i!t~ ':J 'u]..c i. :"t:7'~ g CD t:::I Q) 9-1;;;J :!"S.="a~ s::
,..c:~t>c '" .......,., '01:: -.<:.,..,,., _ "'-0-"" _ "'fIlS
"",=2'":' CC.<:'.D......"'~...=~"'>.tc t::-":"C>;=I::O '
,CD"""aCD~ '--'.,.,,: ....=...0>.2 l>>O'.......!:o~a:siG..cQ,)c~ ~,o:-=C
610 c:!:l" 0:, '0'" 0_.. '" "':;! ""'" ",...-::= '" -1Il:= ^.."'It:!
,,:~ 8-a !~': "~ ~ ~:'i~ ~r~~~.~1-&'a ~fi~fB~, ~,.scS f
.", -:2 CD fa) "E ":;,'f:,':.~-t1 .'S:' s u ~ C1 :3-:;':::.. ':_;"~''i(('(~y::,/-.,~::,,:,: :';;<(\ ,(l', .,..,....... _... .
'",,'5; ~ 007~,""8 'Ol tc H fS'tr::,,;;Zc;0';,;t;;;c;r; ",', "c"e:?;81,~fL;i,
,'. ,.." \>Z;~"3;;\";\i;>('~\)::;.d"4;?f;,.;;:_~,:,,:,..,",,~,,:"_~:,<;,;,L,:,:,;tl;gLii{;i;;"~\,,,,t,\:,_:;,r "" ,,', ;'0;;!"::!;,;:
P!'J!~:~~~~.,r'~ J;'/:;:.:.'". .,~.-"" 'F; - -" ':€:::::-> -,j:::'~:-:~ -- .\).',':;!/.' :-:':':):'::".':E,'>,?'
'"
<1
...
C>l
...
;'ifti;:;1!~f~;~~~
.s"
~~
'~"")."--'-"
..... ct.:I :"'.'
S l!t ';
.:::: Q"
.8.5
o
z
z
2
=;~
_,m Q,)
~'><
'"
al ~ .
'" '" .,
"'O'lf
.. ..
~~.s
=:OCQ
80.",
..... 0... =
"'0 co
, <N
.",~Ilo
s:: s::
~ "0.....
= ..
!lOOS'"
s:: '" 0
..... =' if
~o..
o fi CI$
~ >.i::
'+-I.~ .0
'" 111 ~
~~Ol
'"
.;
0$
...
..
~
C>l
...
""
Q
8
z
""
l>o
Q')
<
';:2s;:\:1t~~~7_>~7;:7::~;,;'=-':;;,~- ,
'-"; ';---:>--;""
1"""\
:a] ~
"'~ 't: '
. >.;, ~., fS",
" '" '
":.s ~
o _Q)~
.,:5:e
I::
:g~ Q)
$S
,...... ~ ~
a.._
..... +l as
- 8';;
al,>< ..
too al
!lGl~
8 ~ 0
.'+-4 ::s u
'" go '"
,., -=
Ol",,,,
"'.<:....
~...., 0
J!~g
.....
, :rl
og..
i
-;:;-
:;;:s;~
....
d
<t)
~
....
..
C>l
'0
Z
g;
~
~,
\
l
o
...
...
...
..,;
:,"
".il"
HAGMAN YAW ARCHITEC-r:.TD.
210 South Galena Suite 24
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
[b~'IT''IT'n @ [f' 'IT'OO~[i\l]~ iii1W'IT''IT' ~[b
(303) 925-2867
OATE
13 November 1986
ATTENTION
Tom Clark
JOB NO.
Clark's Market
RE:
Clark's
TO
300 Puppy Smith Road
Aspen, Colroado 81611
WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ Attached 0 Under separate cover via
US Mail
the following items:
o Shop d rawi ngs
o Copy of Jetter
[iI( Prints
o Change order
o Plans
o Samples
o Specifications
o
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 ea. 11-10-86 3 Scheme A, Scheme S, Section A-A
" ,
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
0 For approval 0 Approved as submitted
0 For your use 0 Approved as noted
0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections
~ For review and comment 0
o FOR BIDS DUE 19
o Resubmit~copies for approval
o Submit_copies for distribution
o Return_corrected prints
o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
Tom - Please call me after you have had a chance to review these.
COPY TO
Larry Yaw
SIGNED:
PlWDllCT240-3 1Ni!fD/1nc., Gro\Oll, Mass. Q1471
If enclosures are lIot as. noted, kindly notify us at once.
.-."
.-."
MEMORANDUM
To: Steve Burstein, Planning Office
From: Elyse Elliott, Engineering Department
Date: March 4, 1987
Re: Clark's Market SPA Amendment
.-.,
.-."
============~====================================~=============
We have no problems with the above application.
1"""\
1"""\
1"""\
,-"
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFIC,E
130 S. Galena street
Asp~( (X) 81611
ef3) 925-2020
Date: ~ .d~, /q J:f
\
Dear
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined
that your application IS NOT complete.
Additional items rEOquired include:
I
J
Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed)
Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage (one copy)
Additional copies of entire application
Author ization by owner for representative to sulxni t appl ica-
tion
Response to list of items (attached/below) demonstrating
compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the
Code, or other specific materials
A check in the amount of $
A. YOu~ applicatiprI .i.s complete and we ha~ sch~duled it ~or
rev1.ew by the X' C on !III f :t:=. We W1.1l
call you if we need any addi tional inform tion prior to that
date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and
make available a copy of the memorandum., Please note that it
IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a
sign, which we can provide you for a $3.00 fee.
B. Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it
review at this time., When we receive the materials we have
rEOquested, we will place you on the next available agenda.
If you have any questions, please call (~iaJ.t- fx))iJ-11Uf ~-
the planner assigned to your case.
,
Sincerely,
A;n?ENIPITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
Lia"'w,.~
a {I nhrYJ ~ of.: .
,-..
,-..
-
"......
?-{2J..{ <6/
t;lZ1.J
4,C.ff"t
FES '2/~ pO,j .
,,'f""~'
~ ".
MEMORANDUM
'.
'\
TO:
city Attorney
city Engineer
Zoning Official
FROM:
steve Burstein, Planning Office
l-iYr2Al72nnnr;::lfm
! d,u~ \~ I.E~ II Vi} !~ ~
IL"r- ",II
,IKi MAR 2 41987 'Ii ill
~" Ii :
, , ' ',!))
. uL -....-1;;;,/
L
RE:
Clark's Market SPA Amendment
DATE:
February 24, 1987
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted
by Tom Clark requesting an SPA Amendment and special review for
an increase in the floor area for Clark 's Market beyond that
allowed in the original SPA Plan for the property which is beyond
the stated requirement for FAR. The existing floor area is
approximately 15,000 sq. ft., which is the maximum allowed by the
SPA for the property and with an expansion, there would be an
additional 1,000 sq. ft. The property is located at 300 N. Mill
Street and is zoned NC/SPA.
Please review this application and return your comments to this
office no later than March 24, 1987 so we have adequate time to
prepare for its presentation before P&Z on April 7.
Thank you.
/ i C\<0
()~~O~V~<
-'I,
-<(,
'" . ~ SUM~RY
A"I- , . \ j) ~ / S,,0'" L i "'-;'-Lw d, Ii'tvr'O-t I,S1,fiItN
1. Type of Application: r,"-I'l'11I/ll'{fV " 0 T Ij v I
2. Describe action/type of development being reques~ed:
l:Xili;^, f/e,,- ,1rl<" Is (. mij,).dd fj-,OO[)l,f, ~lt C:l-P'-IO';Cr, ,l MIQ1k, I OOG sf,
3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of
reports requested:
policy Area/
Referral Aqent
Comments
4.
~5.
Review is: <(P&Z Oril~ (CC/BOCC Only) (P&Z then to CC/BOCC)
Public Hearing: (YES) (NO) rtJ.ott~ Gi~(I-fj .-;.( m..v.- (! 1~.j'Ul~€iJt.v-J,
6. Did you tell applicant to submit list of ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERS? (YES) (NO) Disclosure of Ownership: ~~ : (NO) I
. r, "'l b.i/1V7 c,,;'7,.,.r,
C:1: t., 'I":)
7. What fee was applicant requested to submit: r ' u' .
8. Anticipated date of submission: 1-'lf7!C~'~ 7'
9. COMMENTS/UNIQUE CONCERNS: If I"J;1 A, h, Ct"',I'1 h Sf/; 'M;w~m{y.lnwj.
, v
7!1~-4, iv' ..Uv,'Jt>: (J) e~'J>I~n'i Sf#i-<\- r:e'tdJ{ ~n.l NI~JJ~;./ IfW-- u('{'eii/j,J ,
,
'2.) l!i,7D" SPA. iWd-,M.)4 rVliet. (vTi\'!-ll i5,ori!$, n, ('3) IfCA;on, {." ""p,tn!;;;,
0..1 \'1 1 E-f1u,i { c.J1fall.iii1\o ~_ 'tJ. Sttk ftk iII~tkd
'\
s,.
;:::
li
,<
~.
.s>
1:
.:;:.;
.';'
'x-.
c:;
:.:.,.-"':" ,"'th,'...:J.'V"";;;'~~'1;<,..."l<>>,,~~"lirMI,"';i:n...~~.~ ';"~...!Jt ..;~. ,
r-..
If ~'...' :''''~'U-,...<~.,,,"
': ~~t
':lfi~-
~ 1":.'"
-
.--
1J'J\1e
..'
...J)"
. ...."inq
~,.
,4 I,d
. , ' ~ 'lid
,:.:cl\.
..~~~ons
..
.. ,I '.e 11
, .
../ f ,( tnq
..
. .' .!It
.-'l....:her
: ,. ~ ~:'llle rs
,r'l;."",lI-''"'*~...!:'~''''"'''.'''~~':'>'~~~'-'' .' -"~'...,
,~
.-- ,
- -....,..-. .~,......'.,
1977
,
Regular Meeting
Aspen City Council
March 8. 1976
I'
.
i
;,
I
I.
Ii
E'
r
I
.Il
>'
(
"
~
.,~i Mayor Standley explained that this permit is for the Ski Club1s Las Vegas night like they
;~~it did last year. It is the major fund raising event for the ski club for the Aspen Skiers
. ~ ~(i Educational Foundation. The Eagle's Club is sponsoring the special event permit for
the one day.
-",
. ....'/ -
. '.'al
..... '.lion
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Dave Farney~ Little Annie Ski Corporation, told Council there had been
~;owth in sk~ing at Vail last year, and 24.9 per cent for the Aspen area.
he felt Pitkin County should plan ahead. Farney passed out a draft of the
Impact statement done for the Little Annie Ski area.
2 Hans Brucker told Council he had come up with a personal idea to save money on the
b~ick job for the mall, whether it is five blocks or eight. Brucker said he thought
this could save several hundred dollars. Mayor Standley said the City had already
gotten bid specs oUt on the mall. Brucker answered his idea could be done independently
of the bid specs and would present this to City Manager Mahoney and the planning staff
this week.
a 34' per cent
Farneysa'id
Environmental
3. Rans Gramiger told Council he felt Owl Creek would be developed with the rail, not
necessarily with any other form of transportation~ Gramiger said he felt light rail is
a tremendous growth generator, and the impact on Owl Creek will be great.
COUNCIh'ffiMUER COMMENTS
1. Councilman Behrendt said the alleys are filthy and practically impassable in certain
places. The malls are still dirty. Councilman Behrendt said he would like to see an
effort made in the next week to clean them up.
2. Councilman Wishart suggested the City look into a Charter amend~ent to stiffen up
the requirement for getting petitions for initiatives or referendums. City Attorney
Stuller answered that could be done by extending the number of signatures required
or limiting the items that can be voted on.
3. Councilman De Gregorio brought up the vendor on the Little Nell's sundeck. City
Attorney Stuller said the vendor had been cited by the City this morning.
4. Mayor Standley gave congratulations to the Aspen Police Department for the fine
job they did at Vail and the Colorado Law Enforcement ski race.
5. Mayor Standley told Council he and City Manager Mahoney were going to New York to
make a presentation to Moody's on the City's electric bonds to see if they could get
Aspen an A rating in the bond market.
6. Mayor Standley said the whole deal with the Aspen Institute is getting obfuscated
again. Mayor Standley asked ,City ~anagerMahoney, Ms. Stuller, and Planner Kane to
put together a packet' for the next agenda. The Institute Board meeting is on March 26,
so'the timing is appropriate. Maurice Mitchell of Denver University said that DU had
not made, up their minds whether to put undergraduate or graduate students here.
STUDENT COMMENTS
There were none.
BOARDS & COMMISSIONS APPOINTMENTS
Councilman De Gregorio moved to nominate both Costa Johnson and John Schuhmacher to the
Planning and Zoning Con$ission; seconded by Councilwoman Pedersen. All in favor, motion
carried. John Schuhmacher was elected by 'paper ballot.
Councilman De Gregorio moved to ,re-appoint Gene BishOp to the Board of Examiners &
Appeals; seconded by Councilman Wishart. All in favor, motion carried.
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT - Aspen Ski Club
Councilman Behrendt moved to grant the special events permits; seconded by Councilwoman
Pedersen; All in favor, motion carried.
TRUEMAN PROPERTY - Conceptual subdivision
CitY/County Planner Bill Kane told Council that six major points had been agreed upon
since the last meeting. Trueman agreed to aGO foot road and proper alignment has been
showed. Any reference to the post office size' b.as been dl:opped; the unnecessary curb
cuts on Mill street were dropped. Adequate provision for separate conveyance of land
to the school district has been given (this is lot 4). ~he sporting goods rental has
been dropped. Kane said this left two issuesithe use of land in the panhandle, and
the issue of the food store size.
I
Jim True~an told Council he had reviewed all items discussed at the last meeting and
had made changes favorable to comments of Council. Trueman said he would much appreciate
a motion to approve the subdivision plan as submitted. Councilman Behrendt questioned
not using lot 3 for one year. Trueman said he had no problem with not developing it
!I fer a year.
i,
I'
II
"
I:
Ii
II
I'
Ii
i:
,I
Ii
~yor Standleyls only comment was on a grocery store at 20,000 square feet. M~yor
~tandley said after talking to Bryan Johnson, ETF, and Pamela Gassman, he feels that
~s an inappropriate size grocery store. Hayor Standley said he would like to see a
15,000 square foot grocery store, and asked for Council's opinion. Councilwoman Johnston
concurred that appropriate size is 15,000 square feet. Councilman Behrendt wanted
,..
.,./."''''
, ._'-~z.~:.:':."~::'_'.:'.
,-",--~"---'-'---'-~-""'.
"",~.J.-.~~*",~""
~1978
"7
~
,
I
I
J
~
, ;
i
!
i
} I.
1
!
1
1
,
~
,
'. ?
I ~
) ....
,
;) 1
l i "~
~'
';'
~
~
j
"
.
; i ~
'j
"
.
"
'~ ";
u 1
'::,r
n ~
~:-l:
J.~'.
-,,1
)J;
i
1
_... .'11
~J
.~;"q
;.;~
~
,
;;,',1
~i~
""1>
i
.~
~
~q
_J
,11,1;1
J.n
(
<~'i.'
.f'.
:Re~ular Meeting
Aspen City Council
March 8, 1976
"
.,"~~--'"
15,000 square feet; Councilwoman Pedersen - .15,000 square feet. Councilman Wishart
said CounciL had gone through the process, and he 'would stand by the duly.reachep
decision of 20, O~OO square:.feet.-" Councilmap: De Gregorio obj'rcted to,'(9.~\2:0~:OOO:,I,s<a:1J'are
foot store ',bec'au,se 6f. 1:hat":.12';'OQ'O 'scI\lare,.feetis. grocerY:".'and the :C?th&r'~,-9...;6oo"sqU:a,1':e
feet -is .'ott1er"retaiJ.. uses... 20,,000 ,square feet- i?t,oo',mu'ch, beca,use it. is not a grocery
store. CQun~ilman Parry 'agreed with Coun~ilman Wishart, and said he believed that
20,000 square'feet is ~he right size for that location.
Jim Trueman told Council he could not get an operator capahle of running a sto~e for
less that 20,-000 square feet. Trueman said the grocety store is the key to the project.
Trueman said that zoning exists for a 20,000 sguare foot store on that piece of property.
Councilwoman Johnston objected to the size of 20,000 square feet because it is a traffic
generator and brings people from other -parts of the city. ~oe Porter said that Trueman
had been operating with the due procesS of City Council and had gone on from that
point. Council has changed their minds, and Porter said he did not know where to go
from here. Architect Larry Yaw said the basic problem is that if the 20,000 square
feet store doesn't happen, the operator of that store doesn't happen, then the whole
project doesn't happen. Yaw said he had gone through every phasing strategy possible
to make this happen. (
Mayor Standley said when the Council changed their vote, they were being responsive to
the citizens. It is unfair- to say that the Council is not being predictable and con-
sistent. Aspen now has a 15,000 square foot grocery store. Mayor Standley said it woul
be absurd for the Council to allow development of 20,000 square feet not knowing what
kind of political changes are quite possibly going to occur in the next couple of
months. Mayor Standley said he felt the Council had strong arguments for a smaller
grocery store. Councilman DeGregorio said he did not feel it was the City's responsi-
bility to guarantee a developer economic profit. Kane said it was desirable for. the
City to express what it wants in the way of a grocery store. Kane said he had a hard
time believing that someone can't 15,000 square feet and make a store go in Aspen.
Co~ncilwQroan,Pede~sen,said theargurnent in favor of a large food store was based on
Basalt and Glenwood Springs. This is Aspen, Colorado, and there are certain things
here that are valued such as scale, not too much convenience, taste.
'I'ru
pro
c;::on
Councilman Behrendt moved to deny the conceptual subdivision approval; seconded by
Councilwoman Pedersen.
Trueman asked
10,000 sguare
other retail:
include 2,000
Council to consider the fOllowing changes: second floor employee housing
feet; ground floor 15,000 square foot grocery store, 10,000 square feet
basement 10,000 square feet of health center and service retail and to
square feet of storage for a total of 47,000 square feet.
Kane said to take 5,000 square feet out of the grocery store may not accomplish Cou~qil"
goal; it may just relocate the 5,aOe squafe feet, from the grocery store. Theargument
agair.st the20,QOO ~qua~e foot grocery store is mainly against the non-fqod items: ~this
would just be I'<\oving them. Kane reconunended this 5,000 sgua're feet be: put,'!iri;to,,"~~I:'~ice:
retail uses. Architect Ya..... said the specific uses would comply wi:th../theHne:lgnborhood:
co~~ercial' zone. No one knows at present what uses will be in there, but they' will
comply with the N/C standards. Mayor Standley said if the uses are restricted enough
and given identification so as not to pull away from the tourist retail, then ft'does
not create that problem. Kane said his argument is the duplication of commercial core
retailing.
l'
I
Councilman Behrendt withdrew his motion: Councilwoman Pedersen withdrew her second.
The submitted sit~ plan was'-'marked. to indicate the changes and resubmitted.
Councilman De Gregorio roovedto approve the site plan as marked of to include dropping
the market to 15,000 square feet and inc~easing the retail to 10,000 square feet, at the
zoning discretion, includ~ 2,000 square feet in the basement as storage and to hold the
panhandle in moratorium 'for one year; seconded. by Councilman Parry.
Councilwoman Pedersen said she felt the town
just retail. Councilman rlishart said if, in
what will move there.
needed service/co~~ercial areas most: not
fact, those things are needed, that is
All in favor of the motion with the exception of Councilwoman Pedersen.
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE #4, SERIES OF 1975 - Definition of Commercial Bakeries
Mayor Standley opened the pUblic hearing.
closed the pUblic hearing.
Ther~ were no comments.
Mayor Standley
Councilman Parry moved to read Ordinance #4, Series of 1976; seconded by Councilwoman
Johnston. All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE H
(Series of 1976)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ASPEN ZONING CODE BY THE ADDITION OF TIlE
SUBSECTION (00) TO SECTION 24,3-1 SUCH AS TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEFINITION
OF COMHERCIAL BAKERY; WHICH DEfINITION PROVIDES FOR PRODUCTION AND
WHOLESALING OF BAKED GOODS BUT PROHIBITS OVER THE COUNTER SALES
THEREOF ON THE PREMISES was read by the city clerk.
Councilwoman Pedersen moved to adopt Ordinance #4, Series of 1976/on second read1n9'
. seconded by Councilwoman Johnston. Roll call vote; CouncilmembersBehren4t:.", ay.,
De Gregorio, aye; Johnston, aye; Parry, aye;'pedersen, aye; Wishart, ayer "4yor Staftd~.f
aye. Motion carried.
~2146
,~
~
Regular Meeting
Aspen City Council
January 10, 1977
, .---~-~
,I~ ._-- ---.-...--.." ___--:::::
City Clerk told Council that the Aspen Inn Club had submitted an addendum to the manage_~
ment contract with the Arya, which had met the state's approval. The lease is correct.
Aspen Inn Club has met with the sanitarian's inspection. There have been papers sub- '
mitted for a purchase and sale, but this will be considered later.
: I
"
,
I
All in favor, motion carried.
LE CABARET - Purchase & Sale
Councilman Parry, moved to approve the purchase and sale of Le Cabaret; seconded by
Councilman DeGregorio.
, L,.,
... ~: .,
Brooke Peterson, representing Abe Siani ~ the purchaser, told Council that the new S.;.
operation will not be run like the Crystal Palace but will have meals separate from the
show, which will be more like concerts that a dinner show. The menu will range in
price from moderately priced and a la carte to extensive and full meals. Peterson told i
Council that out of the proceeds of the purchase price to Le Cabaret; sufficient funds
are being held out to pay the outstanding debts. Siani told Council he' was in charge
of food and beverage operations at a country club before moving to Aspen.
All in favor, m~tion carried.
!RUEMAN - Final Plat Approval and PUD
Hal Clark, planning office, stated that the planning office recommends approval of the
final plat. The final plat, PUD and SPA rezoning are all being done at once.
':'r _.....
r ~ !.l
Councilman Wishart moved to approve the final plat and PUD; seconded by Councilman Parry~ ^ii:
City Engineer Dave Ellis said he recommended final plat approval but wanted to discuss
the capital improvements necessary in this area with Council. Ellis stated that Trueman
has agreed vIi th the reimbursement formula '-lorked out for Puppy Smith street. Trueman
has worked with the City extensively and has used the alignment given for Hill street,
which is an 80 foot right-oi-way.
1n the plan for water and electricity, there are certain requirements that the City has:
the obligation to complete somewhat independent of Trueman. The capital improvement for
water would provide a 12 inch main on Mill street and would cost roughly $19,334. This
is a high priority. True~an's building site will necessitate the relocation of an 8
inch line; Ellis recommended that the City pay for oversizing Trueman's 8 inch line.
In electric utilities, Trueman Would be providing service to his commercial development,'
which is a small percentage of the total project. Ellis stated that a loop system would
be best in this situation. It will cost about $20,635 to implement this. Ellis
proposed that the City pay fo~ 50 per cent of the street lighting improvements on Puppy
Smit~ street; there is no lighting there now. All utilities that exist now will be
taken out and the new ones will be undergrounded.
Ellis to~~ C011~cil that the biggest expenditure in conjunction w~th this project is
improvi;1( ..i~' street and the storm drainage system. The $202,000 f1gure 1S a conceptual
estir-:ate .i.:.'.) :~:.:ten.d a 48 inch storm drain which now terminates at Bleeker and Mill.
Mill street wiJ.l having to be regraded and ~idened. Of the total cost, the storm
drain~sc 'iil} be approximately $80,000. Trueman's participation will be in the range
of S39. ")~\ r11is pointed out that construction of Mill street in 1977 is not
feasiJ:.l,-, .;~:3 t:lere are four major construction projects on Mill street.
Ellis stated "that it is important to real.ize that by approving this development and the i
possibility of a post office, there will be extreme traffic problems. The Council has
to make a commitment for sums of money to be spent in the next couple of years to
improve the roadway. The landscaping in this area will not be put in until all the
improvements have been completed, City Manager Mahoney said he would like to incorporatt
the storm drainage to the Aspen Sanitation facility. I
Councilwoman Johns~on asked about these costs and the budqet. Ellis answered that the
water at S19,334 is urgent for 1977; the electric costs at $20,635 are also important.
This is a total of $40,000 for 1977. Finance Director Butterbaugh stated that these
funds are available.
Councilman Wishart amended his motion to give final plat approval for subdivision and
PUD and authorize the Mayor to approve the subdivision agreement and to include the
recommendation of the city engineer; that woter and electric improvements are critical
for this year; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, with the exception of
Councilmembers Behrendt and Johnston. J1otion carried.
"
ORDIN'A1JCE #70, SERIES OF 1976 - Rezoning Trueman Property
Councilman De Gregorio moved to read Ordinance ~70, Series ofl976; seconded by Council-
womnn Pedersen. All in favor, motion carried.
N.~.
fUi'"
Tr...""
ORDINANCE PO
(Series of 1976)
Ii
AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE APPROXIMATELY 8 ACRES DImEO BY JAMES R.
TRUEMAN AND I\SSOCIATES ACCORDIr~G TO An APPROVED SPECIALLY PLANNED
AREA MASTERPLAN FOR THE SITE: THE ELEHENTS OF WIlICH I1ASTERPLAN WILL
CONSTITUTE THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THE AREA, ALL AS PROVIDED
BY ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 24 OF THE 1.SPEN MUNICIPAL CODE was read by
the city clerk.
,
'I
!:
I
:t
:1
I
r
.'. ~ ."-
~~
~.I..
........ ~~fi~"
'~~;>':;~..~i~::7:~7~~~.,....,:"-.::'::'~"~~.:-'~., .
...,.~~f{::~''':':'"':;C,~ ~".... .'~;l ..~
~
.":....~~~:.~,cOO,
.f" .' ~...
1'/'
; :
t'.i1,:::>f
~ .(f2
.,. r:
~~
r; 21
t+:~,
~ ..
': '.
ii ",'. ;
~, ,\ :.,
;i ~
Ii ~
;,; ,,,,
I D
:: 1\
I f II
~
~
o
)>
"
....
Z
riJ
11
D
n
~
. 1~' 'I .j
I j
,
,. ",
,..,,'\
~
;::q:.
\\!
II
X\r
I "i
L f
M
I' j
1 !
;'1
,
I
i
~
i-:--
'---
@
fiijjJ
-- t:::7
I ~ r:€d:
I --.j !iiiiJ
~~-37
i ; i
t ; ~
I: i I
) j ,j I
; j I
;' 11:
~,:
,~
~
I:
~,'
"'t;:
~d
ii~~
\ ~, .
"',' :"i
i i ":..
Iii
I t
I,
i
::~'
! I
I,
III
~
~
i
~
r
~
~
I
.l
I
I
I
I
------
t
I -
,
/
/
/'
..-/
I I I!
~
2:
'/-S>
<->
: \
, I
I
I
, ,
, IIi
~I~
I~
~
z
it
'i Ii
!"""'\
-4
~
~
!"""'\
, !
f
j
!
~
/"""',
"-,
il
I :
, I
! '
I':
~
!
I
j ,
:'-I,,1
~n^
I r:
I i
f~
: ~
~m
i
~ i 3>
"i:.:;..
; "
!' ^ ,
I : III
, : ,-I
I ' I
i, 116
~
o
i'''\ -=
i :2
': .GJ
,_,J",_.:','.-
'D,
.,.....:..\,.. ':,.:,..
i, 0
f,:' :,~ "
1">; n
, '
"~
,....\
.. .,
i;
, .~
I ;
I !
II' " "i,,:,'
il'l ,;z:...
, it
~~
i i I
i l!
II f
I'
\
:;-=::'-8)
= --.-,
UUU. .:-~--------
.. @
Iiiiil
" - I:::J
eg ~
-4 i;m
~
,--
~
"
ii
;;
"
II
i
l
l
-<
zi
llf
~~
I-
~f
i~
-m
2:., '
~~
l
Ii
Ii
,.-,
,~
~
~~
~~
,-.,
~
~
~
~
I
,
,
, '
r""'\.
.-.,
I
~
~
1:
:5. ------
~
! ;
: I
i
; ,
It
~
,
, ,
! '
"
~
--
,
I
!
1
I
__ i
-.-.-' t
I ..-
I ,-"
I ..,--"
i
,
i ,-
! u....~"M
,
1,-
.. ..,,-.--.".'^' ...- j -=-.::=-..
.. I
i
---
~
i
"'~
~~'
I
II
~
~,~~
r ~ I
p---- '~-0.
t\!!!l --4
~l ~ \
J:::l - I
! ; \
~
~._._,'-"-""
._,~_.-...._' -.
-"'-1
~""._':._. .._-",
,., !
'C-"'f
I '
I I
~
[!
(I
II
I ,
! '
Ii
iti
:),.1
II
;,,\1'
hi
~',,'
1lJ
__......_\\ \i,'
;pJ"
~
i !
'\ t
, I
7
~
, '
I i
, '
, ,
, '
I ,
i i
~'
I I
! I
'~
U
o
D
; t,
CI
2
:_\i,::
-..&-:-
~'
" ~
i.I '
, i '
~
III
~ II
IE II
~ !I
~ 't
,. ,I,"'"
.. I oJ
'~
~- ,
a: : ~
d'-
U'
,~,~
,< ;
I..;
I i
I
~
~