HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sp.Pitkin Co Jail.A2595
<-
}-'\,
,-,
-!
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
city of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 03/09/95
DATE COMPLETE:
PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
2737-073-47-851 A25-95
STAFF MEMBER:
Addition Conceotual SPA Review
PROJECT NAME: Pitkin Countv Jail
Project Address: 515 E. Bleeker
Legal Address:
APPLICANT: Pitkin Countv
Applicant Address:
REPRESENTATIVE: Temole Glassier
Representative Address/Phone: 530 E. Main
Asoen. CO
920-5211
st.
81611
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
FEES: PLANNING $
ENGINEER $
HOUSING $
ENV. HEALTH $
TOTAL $ 0
# APPS RECEIVED 6
# PLATS RECEIVED 6
TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: --
P&Z Meeting Date.Apv I l 1 Silo, PUBLIC HEARING: YES @
fIA..y 12th VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
@
CC Meeting Date f./IOA( 13Th PUBLIC HEARING: NO
Jv"'- ~Ioti-) VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
DRCMeeting Date
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
REFERRALS:
yI city Attorney v' Parks Dept. School District
_____ city Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas
v Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT
Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board
City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Board
Envir.Hlth. ACSD Other
v' Zoning Energy Center v' Other HPG
;i;~~;~~========~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_ city Atty
_ Housing
_ City Engineer
_ Open Space
_Zoning _Env. Health
Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
JUN 21 '95 07:58AM PITKIN COUNTY ADMIN
,....."
P.2
.~.
Exhibit G
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
CITY COUNCIL
DATE:
TEMPLS GLASSIER, PITKIN COUNTY
JUNE 26, 1995
JAIL ADDITION
RE:
Attached for your review and approval are three design ideas for
the Courthouse campus. Hopefully one of these alternatives will
lessen the visual effect this jail addition has upon this campus.
All of the alternatives eliminate the circle in the yard. In two
alternatives we have replaced that circle with a pattern brick
walkway that would match the brick walkway in the Courthouse park.
We can make this a little plaza with benches if desirable.
In all the plans we changed the access from the asphalt path to the
entrance of the jail. The current concrete is adj acent to the
planter and is not ADA compl iant. We will remove that portion, put
in a few shrubs and move the sidewalk to make it a straight
entrance from the asphalt path to the new entrance of the Police
Records and Communications.
Alternative #1
With this plan we reuse three of the existing concrete paths
and just reconfigure the area where the circle was and
relocate the walkway to the parking lot. This design does not
eliminate any trees on the campus and adds four trees.
Alternative #2
~s a complete redesign of the walkways. This eliminates the
center area and does not take out any trees. The walkways
meander throughout the campus.
Alternative #3
This design again 'lses the existing concrete walkways with a
relocated sidewalk to the parking lot. This design also
eliminates the tree that is ourrently in the center of the
circle but adds some trees or shrubs.
All of these alternative are just schematic designs and can be
altered. I have brought them to you to see if one or more meets
your approval and will ease your concerns of the impacts this
addition will have on the courthouse campus. I also hope they
better define the entrance to the jail.
JUN 21 '95 07:59AM PITKIN COUNTY ADMIN
1"""',
P.3
'~,
Again to address the concerns that City Council has on the location
of the addition to the jail. You have heard the background on the
reason we picked the location that we did for this addition. It
was a matter of locating the personnel close to the workings of the
law enforcement departments, configuration of the existing jail,
available county owned land, Colorado Department of Corrections
regulations and cost.
Thank you for your time and I hope to better explain our project
fOr yOU at your meeting on the 26th.
p,'~u_t\\'f~ ,
(
..".....
~y"U~
r-.
:j
1 I ____'..n__..
I
c.5 I
I
~ I
I
n I
,
I
c:::~...,....,....-
~ew
~,
..
I{,,(~ vcis :i Co >'Yt.:1^u..lo1.t (",M.,..,...,a
I
I
-----......---,
I
I
I
I
~
J2M.--t'YCV"- c..L.
'}.
..H~~ e!lC IAIL...
-'-"""'"- --r
I
I
I
I
I
"
. "
i 't '..' i'
R.4Nr,
&.
~,
.\~.l'
.
.~.. .
.'"
. ,~'" ~. - '..
.: t'; ..
. ....
. "
.~
:...
'.
-.
. F'"
:;......~..,...
....""-': ...~t...
.~
iii
r"" ..,......
.""; ..;:..-..;~;\k'i.
ft~ :~-l:-:,:"'!'~~;:,'
. .
tl
";;." .
-...-.":':::'- .........
~, ~t1.4'1, V~... Z-
)Y~r~ C5N~~ (
I
',"- 'I
~
,
.. .-~
.:
.
~~t4
."
" .
~.,.'.- ~
',\, , . ..: ,t,:-- ~;::.,
",,~<,,-
, ,"
....
;: ~J. r~' ~TlN'" =u~e..
... .' .~
/ . ,,:.
~~;.:
.' :~
-.
,,.-,,,
7.'
~
s:
<>(
--'
...!
<:3
-;
,
, ,I
""',' I
,'''' .
-,,..
~. j
~:;;r~ ~l (ClY\rnU nlc.o...-hCV\:S Q.V\.~~
I
_____-1-__,
I
I
I
I
I
-lJ<''''IL~~~J.!:-_1
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
"
~"
. .
-.,. ',f,.,:.-.._;.,~."q..~ "
fl!>t.
"",to/<;.
.' .
tf.4n;
. .~"., ~..
.-.'.
~~rQ,
.;;f~ ..",.."=tt':-
'.
.,
!;".i_'J-
': ~.,#;.: i..,-,t.,~:~;;'
'A~~~.~';~~:
. '
....-..
....- .~'i
t;
HI t~Il"t\"+".c, .~ s'
.
).....:1VTH C!;NT.....
(
" .
j
".";
:
.
-.,."
",
.
"
.. "',,0:
.-
6
. ..,','
...... . ..'
"
I..h';'
o. .
.'
'c'" .~..",
~""..,
~ ....
::i.'"~,-,';',"',5' .-
,p,.,.,., --0 :::-...'..~;
'"
'.
.:~.....,.~
...~ '~:',~
,'-"
5
~
~
S
I
I
,
I
I
-::;1
c5 I
JI
.J
i
I
I
I
I
,
'"1
f<e~cnxs I L
~ co"'"""., Cfn"'1 5
'Lvt Iv "-"'.i:1.L - -t
I
I
I
I
-l-H",sS,.g' ~, ~!.!:::.-,
I
I
I
I
I
Nwi:"-~'l-:'
"..~-~~.
...... ',",. ..-..;.,..;... .)J)t.
'. ..........
.'-" ;,.,':"T'
,: '..;.~$
.'NWrI e.t~ . ~ T;o:~4,'l'::.'t:)4FI "
""'40--""" , "f"'I"':~
~;,;,l
f :!'
';;-~';
~'.. '
...
:-.. ~
.,,:,.1
k'f' ..
i; '"' .~~~j
- l -'. ..,.,...~" .t~.. J,io."".....~.....
~ .'~ ~.Jl.- ':.~."~~-i':-_~~t' . :~',.'
.' .,.._ .'Il',~.~.""~ . .... ~__., __.....,.,
~
). . ~
...I','i:.':
1"""\.
.,-"
,
VI' a..
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City
,
Council {\,~
City Managerl)J
THRU:
Amy Margerum,
THRU:
stan Clauson, Community Development Director
DATE:
June 26, 1995
RE:
Pitkin County Jail. Expansion Final SPA Review and GMQS
Exemption - 2nd Reading Ordinance 23, 1995
FROM:
Mary Lackner, Planner
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Planning Office and Planning and Zoning commission
recommends approval of the applicant's request for GMQS Exemption
and Final SPA Amendment to add approximately 1,500 sq. ft. to the
Pitkin County Jail.
At second reading on May 22nd, Council raised concern with the
location of the proposed addition in relation to the quadrangle and
that other design alternatives should be considered. The applicant
has submitted a letter and three design alternatives for the
quadrangle (Exhibit G).
Staff supports quadrangle design alternative #1 because it provides
definition of the jail entrance from the pedestrian paths and
redesigns the quadrangle to fit with the proposed jail addition
while preserving the existing tree at the center of the present
quadrangle.
APPLICANT: Pitkin County Board of County commissioners,
represented by Temple Glassier.
LOCATION/ZONING: Lot 1 of the Pitkin County Center Subdivision is
a 1.437 acre parcel which contains the Pitkin County Courthouse and
jail facilities. The subject parcel has an SPA (specially Planned
Area) overlay and is zoned PUB (Public).
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking to add approximately 1,500
square feet onto the Pitkin County Jail to provide more space for
the Communication and Police Departments, and to add handicapped
access to the jail facility. The addition is proposed as a one-
story structure attached to the jail, between the jail and the
courthouse.
Review of the building plans indicate that the Communications
Center and three offices will be located in this new area in
addition to a small records area.
1
-.
."-,,
,,"
Please see the attached application for proposed site plan and
building details that are included in Exhibit "A".
PROCESS: This project is being reviewed through the Final SPA
review process, since the addition generally complies with the
Conceptual SPA plan that was approved in 1982, as permitted by
Section 24-7-804 (E) (2) of the Aspen Municipal Code. The applicant
is also seeking GMQS Exemption pursuant to section 24-8-
104(C) (1) (b) of the Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND: The 1982 Pitkin County Center Subdivision SPA Plan
is attached to the memorandum. There were no conditions or
representations indicated on the plat or in the project files.
The 1982 approvals essentially provided for the construction of the
jail facility that was finally completed in November 1983.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: complete referral memos are attached to this
memo as the following exhibits.
Exhibit "B" Engineering
Exhibit "c" Housing Office
Exhibit "D" Parks
The Historic Preservation Officer Amy Amidon has reviewed the
proposed addition and pedestrian path modifications and believes
the project is consistent with the historic character of the plaza.
CURRENT ISSUES: Staff evaluation of the GMQS Exemption and SPA
Amendment criteria is included in Exhibit "E". The applicant has
not proposed any affordable housing or parking mitigation for the
1,500 sq. ft. of space that is being created. Staff believes that
these items must be mitigated by the County as the GMQS Exemption
for construction of essential community facilities requires
mitigation. To comply with the requirements of the Code, that
applicant needs to provide mitigation for 2.7 employees and 4.5
parking spaces.
city Council may choose to make a finding that the proposed
development is associated with a nonprofit entity and may be exempt
from some or all of the mitigation requirements.
The 1982 Pitkin County Center Subdivision SPA Plan did not address
specific enlargement of the jail facility. This proposal is
considered a substantial SPA amendment. Substantial amendments to
an SPA are accomplished by a review of the Planning and Zoning
Commission for their recommendation to City Council through the
Final SPA process.
It should be noted that all dimensional requirements of the PUB
zone district are set by the adoption of the conceptual and final
2
,-.,
.'-',
development plans. As $tated previously, these items were not
called out on the Final SPA Plan or in the record of the original
approvals in 1982. The applicant has not proposed to decrease
setbacks or increase parking, however, usable open space will be
decreased.
Due to the pending land trade between the city and the County, the
triangular parcel between the jail and Rio Grande Place will be
transferred to the County. The City Parks Department has
maintained this land, but is seeking the County to take
responsibility of maintenance of all County land around the jail
and courthouse buildings.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office and Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend approval of the proposed SPA amendment and
GMQS Exemption to add approximately 1500 square feet of space to
the jail subject to the following conditions:
-.l 1.
"
The applicant shall replace the approximately 1,500 square
feet of lost usable open space on another portion of the
property.
2.
The amended SPA Development Plan shall be recorded in the
office of the Pitkin county Clerk and Recorder. Failure on
the part of the applicant to record the amended SPA
Development Plan within a period of one hundred and eighty
(180) days following approval by the City Council shall render
the SPA Plan approval invalid and reconsideration and approval
of both by the Commission and City Council will be required
before their acceptance and recording, unless an extension or
waiver is granted by city Council for a showing of good cause.
This plan shall identify the new addition, landscaping and
walkways, delineate existing parking spaces, shall show
trash, recycle and utility areas, and bicycle parking areas.
This plan shall be approved by the City Engineer and Planning
Office.
3.
The architectural plans dated March 1, 1995 and those that
were presented at the April 25th P&Z meeting by Caudill
Gustafson & Associates Architects indicate the location, size,
and height of the proposed addition, and shall be used to
determine the dimensional requirements of this request. Any
changes to these plans will be subject to section 24-7-804(E)
of the Aspen Municipal Code.
4. Snow must not be plowed into the park area north of the jail
as this pushes road gravel into the park and breaks the
sprinkler heads.
5. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the
building addition, the county shall complete all obligations
3
!""""
.1"'"'\
of the Intergovernmental Agreement approved under city council
Resolution 29, Series of 1992.
6.
The County shall take over maintenance of
irrigation of all property around the jail,
triangle to the north. Parks will facilitate
of this obligation.
landscape and
including the
the switchover
~
7.
Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a storm runoff
plan prepared by a registered engineer must be submitted to
the City Engineer. This plan must provide for no more than
historic flows to leave the site as provided for in section
24-7-1004 (C) (4) (f) of the City Code.
8. The applicant shall consult with the city Electric
superintendent prior to the issuance of a building permit and
provide electric load information in order to determine if a
transformer easement is need on the site.
9. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement
districts which may be formed for construction of right-of-
way improvements.
10. The applicant shall consult City Engineering for design
considerations of development wi thin public rights-of-way,
Parks Department for vegetation species, and shall obtain
permits for any work or development, including landscaping,
within public rights-of-way from City streets Department.
11. No tracking of mud onto City streets shall be permitted during
construction.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Ordinance 23, 1995 for a 1,500
sq. ft. addition to the Pitkin County Jail and GMQS Exemption,
subject to the conditions recommended in the June 26, 1995 Planning
Office memorandum."
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
Ordinance 23, Series of 1995
4
,If
Exhibits:
"A"
liB"
"e"
"D"
"En
ifF"
"G"
/""",
.~
Application and maps
Engineering
Housing Office
Parks
SPA Amendment and GMQS Exemption Review criteria
Follow up letter from applicant and Bob Braudis
Three quadrangle design alternatives
5
,
Vicinity 1\1ap
1""\
Exhibit A
-
"~\L.A \" \ \
;--().~, ~"
'" l)~
^~~.
<::>
~
_ l.J
:;-.-r-:P
'" CJ/
... r::-----'
; t,::--
~Jr--' ~
~
r
!/1 t
t:
ATl2ICI'IMENl' 1
~ USE APPUCAT:J:CN F<:.al
~
1) P:roject: Na1In PITKIN COONTY JAIL ADDITION,
2) P:roject IDeation 515 E BLEEKER, ASPEN CO
BLOCK 47 LOT 1
(indicate ",L..",=I: ad::'h. , lot: & bl.ock J'II~, legal. descr.ipt:icn Where
COWL<.1,A.iate)
3) PJ. s .L Zol1ina' SPA
4) IDt: size 1.44 ACRES
5) 1\G'lli<:ant's Name, Adch. - &. EbJne # PITKIN COUNTY, 530 E MAIN, 3RD
ASPEN CO 81611
920-5211
3RD FL. ASPEN CO 81611
& Hla1e # TEMPLE GLASSIER. 530 E MAIN
920-5211
6) ~ T _rl.ative's Name, Adch.
7) '!ype of 1\J:!'li,.".tion (p'='= dJeck all tbat C!IPly):
_ OJndi.tiona1 Use
..L COl~Wa1 SPA
..L F:ina1: SPA
_ Ccrx:epbla1 Histnd.c Dev.
,.
----" 8040. Greenl.:ine
SL.. ...~.....;"
_ eam _~,,~.
_' n.. "=J:'Wa1 roo
_ Final Historic :oev.
Minar, Historic :.J.iN.
_ ~"1 Review
Final. lUD
,_ Hist:aric, nonr.l in,.,.,
_ lbmt:ain yi.ew Plane ~ Sl1l:ldi:v:ic:inn
_ a.ulco.cinil'lmi?'.ation --'- 'l'elI:f;IMap Amerdu.:.d.
_ Hist:aric Designation,
.
_ IDt: Split,lLot Line
1!djt='--"it
~ QO:l AlJ.obDent
~ QO:l ExeIpti.on
8) Descr.iption of EXisting' Uses (,..~, ani' type, ,of elci.stiD;J ~"I::~i
apprax:ilIIate sq. ft. i ....",.n,.,- of bo:Lh.........,.iany pteYiaJs ~ g::am:ed ''t1,,- ...'<le
kU-",!:,,=:t:y) . '
Pi:eklri....County trail is one bui]dina t:hat houses 24 inmates.. 12
'Detention officer, 16 Dispatchers, and 3 Police records people.
There are beds'for the inmates.
square feet
9) Descr.iption of. Devel. \.".-.t Appli.:atial
Reauestinq approval for a ~500 'square foot addition to house
the Communications department and to make the Pitkin Countv Jail
handicap accessible for the public and the staff that works there.
10) Have you attati-'l the fol1ow1nfl
')( :Response to At'\?k I..._.d. 2, Minimlm ~'"";...,;nn Ccnt:ents
X Response to A~ I...~it 3, RI-"i'Fil'! ~1""'i_it"ll'\ Ccnt:ents
---L- :Response to Att:.ad:mlent: 4, Revi.e5i st:arDaxds for Your 1\[{>' j e<>tion
, .
~
I)
...
c
~o...
J
t't\
'"
I
.
r
/
,
,
\
___J
r---'
,
/
.....-.:.:
,"""
.'
I ,'-'H
'I ',A, ,.:'...'
\ .,.~:.' .:::,:,!. .,' .
.~
~
i
Ei
E~
I
Ill!
rill;
lilll
'11111
.....11.
IIIII
------------...il
\.t" 'f~':'-- I,'" I!
!. '------I-----r: 'il . !
': , !l, .ll-_________.J:___ . ,
- - -::: .:'JJ! :--_::'::--=-LL. "' ~
,----~----~~ . H
--r"':.---' I I .
[ I I .
lIE 'HHn.'.j..n.....'..........+... '.L...c::;- --.'--.............1
ii' _J , I '.1
'. ,.I : : 1---;-"'1 Iljllll
'L, . ',- ---.,.J.t--.lj---hllli
~J :' i l.-iNl j; .' ! IIII
\.1 Ji I l.._....___J .
I: f! F-:..-:.----J
h, .. r-- ---- i
>'1 <, ; I I j
r;1 "', I I
!1, .... r-J I I
"l I _.........________-1 ! "
,; FL----~-.; : '---" _ : If:
; ; ,./ i__
'- . i, "------------~/I \
~.~ I -I" _' 1:1
..~...~... ss I./.I -j
/........"'-.\ ~.J:.----:..---7. --": .
'r. "~;-~", ',,- ',. t+,
1. :~'.~ I "" .
I . '. '-'
II','. '. II
r~ .
i; 1111
I
i
I
,
I
i
,
.
.
,.I
.I
/
J.J:lUI
/
i
;'
......
m
'>;::'J
"f..'
~ .1.'
,.f...,
\ .~;
T
C'
-. t.;:.:..
. "1
"
~ . ~
: .-
.:,.; ",
-.
'"
.
I
I
I. . .
,/ .
l--------~--.;,L.-'l
I .,
. ,
I . '1
, Ip
!!
I
:
I I
I ..1_,____,___..
r---- ..
I ./' >
I . I
l-
.,'
t.- .:.:.:.:."'-.
,
.
.
.
i
.
!
.- - -- --
~
.
.
.
=
.
.
.
\''1U'YO
!
j
~
i
i
P.
!.
I""'"
\{ II
,
~)
r'I
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and city council
THRU:
Amy Margerum, city Manager
THRU:
stan Clauson, Community Development Director
DATE:
May 22, 1995
Pitkin County Jail Expansion Final SPA Review and GMQS
Exemption - 2nd Reading Ordinance 23, 1995
RE:
FROM:
Mary Lackner, Planner
------------------------~-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Planning Office and Planning and Zoning commission
recommends approval of the applicant's request for GMQS Exemption
and Final SPA Amendment to add approximately 1,500 sq. ft. to the
Pitkin County Jail.
At first reading Council raised concern with the location of the
proposed addition and that other design alternatives should be
considered. The applicant has submitted a letter (Exhibit F) which
explains the design process and why the addition needs to be
located where it is proposed. A letter from Sheriff Bob Braudis
is also included in this exhibit. The applicant has not redesigned
the project to incorporate Council's comments.
APPLICANT: pitkin county Board of County Commissioners,
represented by Temple Glassier.
LOCATION/ZONING: Lot 1 of the Pitkin County Center Subdivision is
a 1.437 acre parcel which contains the Pitkin county Courthouse and
jail facilities. The subject parcel has an SPA (Specially Planned
Area) overlay and is zoned PUB (Public).
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking to add approximately 1,500
square feet onto the Pitkin County Jail to provide more space for
the Communication and Police Departments, and to add handicapped
access to the jail facility. The addition is proposed as a one-
story structure attached to the jail, between the jail and the
courthouse.
Review of the building plans indicate that the Communications
Center and three offices will be located in this new area in
addition to a small records area.
Please see the attached application for proposed site plan and
building details that are included in Exhibit "A".
PROCESS:
This project is being reviewed through the Final SPA
1
r"'\
,-"
review process, since the addition generally complies with the
conceptual SPA plan that was approved in 1982, as permitted by
section 24-7-804(E) (2) of the Aspen Municipal Code. The applicant
is also seeking GMQS Exemption pursuant to section 24-8-
104(C) (1) (b) of the Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND: The 1982 Pitkin county Center Subdivision SPA Plan
is attached to the memorandum. There were no conditions or
representations indicated on the plat or in the project files.
The 1982 approvals essentially provided for the construction of the
jail facility that was finally completed in November 1983.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Complete referral memos are attached to this
memo as the following exhibits.
Exhibit "B" Engineering
Exhibit "C" Housing Office
Exhibit "D" Parks
The Historic Preservation Officer and Zoning Enforcement Officer
indicated they do not have any concerns with this project and have
not submitted written comments.
CURRENT ISSUES: Staff evaluation of the GMQS Exemption and SPA
Amendment criteria is included in Exhibit "E". The applicant has
not proposed any affordable housing or parking mitigation for the
1,500 sq. ft. of space that is being created. Staff believes that
these items must be mitigated by the County as the GMQS Exemption
for construction of essential community facilities requires
mitigation. To comply with the requirements of the Code, that
applicant needs to provide mitigation for 2.7 employees and 4.5
parking spaces.
The 1982 Pitkin County Center Subdivision SPA Plan did not address
specific enlargement of the jail facility. This proposal is
considered a substantial SPA amendment. Substantial amendments to
an SPA are accomplished by a review of the Planning and Zoning
Commission for their recommendation to city Council through the
Final SPA process.
It should be noted that all dimensional requirements of the PUB
zone district are set by the adoption of the conceptual and final
development plans. As stated previously, these items were not
called out on the Final SPA Plan or in the record of the original
approvals in 1982. The applicant has not proposed to decrease
setbacks or increase parking, however, usable open space will be
decreased.
Due to the pending land trade between the City and the County, the
triangular parcel between the jail and Rio Grande Place will be
2
.1""'\
,-.
transferred to the County.
maintained this land, but
responsibility of maintenance
and courthouse buildings.
The City Parks Department
is seeking the County to
of all County land around the
has
take
jail
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office and Planning and Zoning
commission recommend approval of the proposed SPA amendment and
GMQS Exemption to add approximately 1500 square feet of space to
the jail subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall replace the approximately 1,500 square
feet of lost usable open space on another portion of the
property.
2. The amended SPA Development Plan shall be recorded in the
office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Failure on
the part of the applicant to record the amended SPA
Development Plan within a period of one hundred and eighty
(180) days following approval by the city council shall render
the SPA Plan approval invalid and reconsideration and approval
of both by the Commission and city Council will be required
before their acceptance and recording, unless an extension or
waiver is granted by City Council for a showing of good cause.
This plan shall identify the new addition, delineate existing
parking spaces, shall show trash, recycle and utility areas,
and bicycle parking areas. This plan shall be approved by the
city Engineer and Planning Office.
3. The architectural plans dated March 1, 1995 and those that
were presented at the April 25th P&Z meeting by Caudill
Gustafson & Associates Architects indicate the location, size,
and height of the proposed addition, and shall be used to
determine the dimensional requirements of this request. Any
changes to these plans will be subject to section 24-7-804(E)
of the Aspen Municipal Code.
4. Snow must not be plowed into the park area north of the jail
as this pushes road gravel into the park and breaks the
sprinkler heads.
5. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the
building addition, the county shall complete all obligations
of the Intergovernmental Agreement approved under City Council
Resolution 29, Series of 1992.
The County shall take over maintenance of
irrigation of all property around the jail,
triangle to the north. Parks will facilitate
of this obligation.
7. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a storm runoff
landscape and
including the
the switchover
6.
3
I""'"
.r-..
plan prepared by a registered engineer must be submitted to
the City Engineer. This plan must provide for no more than
historic flows to leave the site as provided for in section
24-7-1004(C) (4) (f) of the City Code.
8. The applicant shall consult with the city Electric
Superintendent prior to the issuance of a building permit and
provide electric load information in order to determine if a
transformer easement is need on the site.
9. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement
districts which may be formed for construction of right-of-
way improvements.
10. The applicant shall consult City Engineering for design
considerations of development within public rights-of-way,
Parks Department for vegetation species, and shall obtain
permits for any work or development, including landscaping,
within public rights-of-way from City streets Department.
11. No tracking of mud onto city streets shall be permitted during
construction.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Ordinance 23, 1995 for a 1,500
sq. ft. addition to the Piktin .County Jail and GMQS Exemption,
subject to the conditions recommended in the May 22, 1995 Planning
Office memorandum."
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
Ordinance 23, Series of 1995
Attachments:
blue print drawings of proposed addition
Exhibits:
"A"
"B"
"e"
"0"
"En
"F"
Application and maps
Engineering
Housing Office
Parks
SPA Amendment and GMQS Exemption Review criteria
Follow up letter from applicant and Bob Braudis
4
~,
r-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Suzanne Wolff
FROM:
Stan Clauson, City C.D. Director
DATE:
18 May 1995
RE:
Jail Expansion Memo
Please add an additional condition to be inserted as Condition #5 to be inserted into both the
Memo and the Ordinance and renumber all subsequent conditions. Condition #5 shall read as
follows:
5. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building addition; the County
shall complete all obligations of the Intergovernmental Agreement approved under City
Council Resolution 29, Series of 1992, Sj3@d15(',l1y:
'a..~ Convey to the City the property upon which the municipal parking facility has
-""'bee!l.constructed,
b, Execute'anencro~chment agreement authorizing the City to use the property upon
which the Galena'Street turn-around has been constructed,
c. Pay to the City the sum of $12,50Q,
d. Convey to the City the property UpOIl whi(;hthe Aspen Youth Center has
constructed a building, . ...... .
e. Convey to the City a transit/trail easement for the constructiO,I1.' operation, and
maintenance of trolley tracks between the County Jail and the"Y-o.I!!h Center
building. ~'-..
Add an "Appendix G" to the memo entitled "Rio Grande SPA--Intergovernmental Agreement"
r-.
(
(r-.
RESOLUTION NO. t-t:)
Series of 1992
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ASPEN, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY AND THE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY, RELATIVE TO THE
EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE LIBRARY PARCEL, THE
MUNICIPAL GARAGE PARCEL, THE YOUTH CENTER BUILDING PROPERTY, THE
LAND NORTH OF THE COUNTY JAIL, AND A TRANSIT/TRAIL EASEMENT BETWEEN
THE COUNTY JAIL AND THE YOUTH CENTER BUILDING, SETTING FORTH THE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SAID LAND EXCHANGES, AND AUTHORIZING THE
MA YOR TO EXECUTE, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, SAID
INTERGOVERNMET AL AGREEMENT AND ALL OTHER LEGAL DOCUMENTS
NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE CONTEMPLATED LAND EXCHANGES.
WHEREAS, The City and the County entered into a Land Exchange Agreement in April,
1982 to exchange certain parcels of land for the purpose of facilitating the construction of certain
public improvements; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with said Land Exchange Agreement the City did convey to
the County a tract of land and vacated a portion of a certain right-of-way to permit the County
to construct a County Jail on County property; and,
?
WHEREAS, in accordance with said Land Exchange Agreement the County did convey
to the City certain parcels of land commonly referred to as the Oden property, the old county
stable property, and the Aspen One property; and,
WHEREAS, the conveyance of the Oden property and the old county stable property
were made subject to the following reversionary interest retained by the County:
"PROVIDED, that the purpose of this grant is to facilitate the construction
of a performing arts center in accordance with the City's Rio Grande
MasterPlan, as it may be revised from time to time, In the event that
such a center is not constructed by April 12, 1992, the above described
real property shall revert to the Coun ty . "
WHEREAS, the Warranty Deed from the County granting the Oden property to the City
made the reversion of the property contingent upon the County reimbursing the City for
(f""'\
(~
payments made by the City for the purchase of the Oden property; and,
WHEREAS, the Library has constructed a library facility on the property previously
intended for the performing arts center; and,
WHEREAS, the City has constructed a municipal parking structure on a portion of the
old county stable property; and,
WHEREAS, the City and the County have permitted the Aspen Youth Center to construct
a building on land partially owned by each of them; and,
WHEREAS, other municipal improvements have been commenced or completed pursuant
to approval by the City Council of the City under the Conceptual Specially Planned Area Plan
for the Rio Grande Parcel, Resolution No, 37, Series of 1988; and,
WHEREAS, the Parties are in agreement as to the conditions under which the Library
facility,. municipal parking structure, Aspen Youth Center, and other municipal improvements
have been constructed and wish to memorialize their agreement herein; and
WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council an Intergovernmental
Agreement between the City of Aspen, the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County,
and the Board of County Trustees for the Pitkin County Library relative to exchange of property
commonly known as the library parcel, the municipal parking garage parcel, the Youth Center
building property, the property north of the County Jail, and a transit/trail easement between the
County Jail and the Youth Center building,a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit "I".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO:
That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves that intergovernmental
Agreeement between the City of Aspen, the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County,
cr-,
(,~
and the Board of County Trustees for the Pitkin County Library, a true and accurate copy of
which is attached and incorporated herein, and does hereby authorize the Mayor of the City of
Aspen to execute said intergovernmental agreement and all other legal documents necessary to
effectuate the land exchanges contemplated.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on
the day of , 1992.
John S. Bennett, Mayor
I, Kathryn S, Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing
is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen,
Colorado, at a meeting held on the day hereinabove stated.
Kathryn S, Koch, City Clerk
iga.res
..
.i"'I
C
(i"'I
,
CITY OF ASPEN
City Attorney's Office
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920-5055
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Members of Council
FROM:
John P. Worcester
DATE:
October 30, 1992
RE:
Resolution to Approve Rio Grande SPA - Intergovernmental Agreement
Attached please find a resolution which, if passed, would authorize the Mayor to execute the
IGA accompanying the resolution and all legal documents necessary to effectuate the land
exchanges contemplated by the IGA,
The IGA is an effort to clear up a number of issues between the City and County relating to land
within the Rio Grande SPA. In short, the IGA would commit the parties as follows:
City agrees to:
A. Subdivide the Rio Grande parcel and cause a subdivision plat to be recorded.
B. Convey to the Library title to the property upon which the Library's new facility
has been constructed.
C. Create an access easement behind the library between Mill Street and the parking
garage, This would also provide access the back side of the library.
D. Convey to the County title to the property North of the County Jail for them to
use for future expansion .of the Jail.
County agrees to:
E. Convey to the City the property upon which thd municipal parking facility has
been constructed.
F, Execute an encroachment agreement authorizing the City to use the property upon
1"""\
(.
(~
which the Galena Street turn-around has been constructed.
G. Pay to the City the sum of $ 12,500.00. This amount represents a compromise
between the figures the City and the County believe is owed, (The City and
County could not agree on when the Library should have started taking over the
responsibility for paying the Oden note - $lS,162/Yr.)
H. Convey to the City the County property upon which the Aspen Youth Center has
constructed a building.
I. Convey to the City a transit/trail easement for the construction, operation and
maintenance of trolley tracks between the County Jail and the Youth Center
building, The County shall have the right to review. all design plans and
construction activity to ensure that the structural integrity of the County Jail is not
compromised by the contruction and operation of a trolley.
Library agrees to:
J, Set aside a minumum of 2,500 square feet of separate, secured space in its library
facility and shall make available to the County for lease upon occupancy of the
new library facility for a period of at least ten years.
iga.mem
".....
, '
(
(,-."
DRAFT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), is made and entered
as of this _ day of , 1992, by and among the CITY OF
ASPEN, Colorado, a home rule municipal corporation ("Aspen") the BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, Colorado, ("County"); and, the BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY, a Colorado statutory library district
established pursuant to Section 24-90-101, et seq., C,R.S, ("Library"); with the City, the County
and the Library sometimes referred to herein as the "Parties",
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, The City and the County entered into a Land Exchange Agreement in April,
1982 to exchange certain parcels of land for the purpose of facilitating the construction of certain
public improvements; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with said Land Exchange Agreement the City did convey to
the County a tract of land and vacated a portion of a certain right-of-way to permit the County
to construct a County Jail on County property; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with said Land Exchange Agreement the County did convey
to the City certain parcels of land commonly referred to as the Oden property, the old county
stable property, and the Aspen One property; and,
WHEREAS, the conveyance of the Oden property and the old county stable property
were made subject to the' following reversionary interest retained by the County:
"PROVIDED, that the purpose of this grant is to facilitate the construction
of a performing arts center in accordance with the City's Rio Grande
Master Plan, as it may be revised from time to time, In the event that
such a center is not constructed by April 12, 1992, the above described .
real property shall revert to the County. "
WHEREAS, the Warranty Deed from the County granting the Oden property to the City
made the reversion of the property contingent upon the County reimbursing the City for
payments made by the City for the purchase of the Oden property; and,
WHEREAS, the Library has constructed a library facility on the property previously
intended for the performing jlrts 'center; and,
WHEREAS, the City has constructed a municipal parking structure on a portion of the
old county stable property; and,
1
I"".
e
(I"".
WHEREAS, the City and the County have permitted the Aspen Youth Center to construct
a building on land partially owned by each of them; and,
WHEREAS, other municipal improvements have been commenced or completed pursuant
to approval by the City Council of the City by resolution to approve the Conceptual Specially
Planned Area Plan for the Rio Grande Parcel, Resolution No. 37, Series of 1988; and,
WHEREAS, the Parties are in agreement as to the conditions under which the Library
facility, municipal parking structure, Aspen Youth Center, and other municipal improvements
have been constructed and wish to memorialize their agreement herein;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants, benefits
and obligations set out below, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged by each of the respective
Parties,
IT IS AGREED as follows:
1. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS
1 ,I In consideration of the obligations and covenants made and performed for its benefit by the
Library and the County hereunder, The City agrees as follows:
a, The City shall subdivide the Rio Grande parcel and cause a subdivision plat to be
recorded in the office of the Pitkin County' Clerk and Recorder pursuant to the terms of Section
24- 7-1004 of the Municipal Code. The subdivision plat shall contain lots that identify land upon
which the library building, parking garage and Youth Center buildings have been constructed
on City owned property,
b. The City shall convey to the Library all of its right, title and interest in and to the
property upon which the Library's new facility has been constructed,as is more fully described
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, Said conveyance shall be by appropriate Quitclaim Deed and
shall substantially conform with Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
c, The deed from the City to the Library conveying the library property shall retain in
the name of the City a 20 foot wide access easement providing access from Mill Street to the
Parking facility,
d. The City shall convey to the County all of its right, title and interest in and to the
property North of the County Jail, as is more fully described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto.
Said conveyance shall be by appropriate Quitclaim Deed and shall substantially conform with
Exhibit "D" attached hereto.
.
II. COUNTY'S OBLIGATIONS
2.1 In consideration of the oblibations and covenants made and performed for its benefit by the
Library and the City hereunder, the County agrees as follows:
2
f""'.
(
(f""'.
a. The County shall convey to the City all of its right, title and interest in and to the
property upon which the municipal parking facility has been constructed, as is more fully
described in Exhibit "E" attached hereto. Said conveyance shall be by appropriate Quitclaim
Deed and shall substantially conform with Exhibit "F" attached hereto.
b, The County shall execute an encroachment agreement authorizing the City to use the
property upon which the Galena Street turn-around has been constructed, as is more fully
described in Exhibit "G" attached hereto. Said encraochment agreement shall be by appropriate
Quitclaim Deed and shall substantially conform with Exhibit "R" attached hereto.
c. The County shall pay to the City the sum of $ 12,500,00 which corresponds to the
amount that the City has paid to date for the property commonly referred to as the Oden
property. No further payments shall be required of the County to satisfy the conditions of
reverter set forth in the Oden property deed from the County to the City.
d. The County shall convey to the City all of its right, title and interest in and to the
property upon which the Aspen Youth Center has constructed a building, as is more fully
described in Exhibit "I" attached hereto. Said conveyance shall be by appropriate Quitclaim
Deed and shall substantially conform with Exhibit "J" attached hereto.
e, The County shall convey to the City a transit/trail easement for the construction,
operation and maintenance of trolley tracks between the County Jail and the Youth Center
building. Said easement shall be sufficiently wide and in substantially the same location as the
current pedestrian trail. The County shall' have the right to review all construction plans and
activity to ensure that the structural integrity of the County Jail is .not compromised by the
contruction and operation of a trolley.
III. LIBRARY'S OBLIGATIONS
3,1. In consideration of the obligations and covenants made and performed for its benefit by
the County and the City hereunder, the Library agrees as follows:
a. The Library shall set aside a minumum of 2,500 square feet of separate, secured
space in its library facility and shall make available to the County for lease upon occupancy of
the new library facility for a period of at least ten years.
IV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
4.1. Attorneys' Fees,
If any action at law or in equity shall be brought under this Agreement, or for or
on account of any breach of, or to enforce or interpret any of the covenants, terms, or conditions
.ofthis Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party as part
of the prevailing party's costs reasonable attorneys' fee, the amount of which shall be fixed by
the court and shall be made a part of any judgment or decree rendered,
3
~
c
( .-.,
4,2, Bindin!! Effect.
This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the Parties
hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
4,3, Severability,
In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforce-
able by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unen-
forceable any other provision hereof.
4.4, Amendments,
The terms ofthis Agreement shall not be waived, altered, modified, supplemented
or amended in any manner whatsoever except by written instrument signed by each of the Parties
hereto,
4,5, Execution in Countelllarts.
This Agreement shall be executed in three counterparts, each of which shall be
an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
4,6, Applicable Law,
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Colorado,
4.7. Waiver.
The waiver by any of the Parties hereto or failure of anyone of them to take
action with respect to any breach of any term, covenant, or condition herein contained shall not
be deemed to be a waiver of such term, covenant, or condition, or subsequent breach of the
same, or any other term, covenant, or condition therein contained.
4.8. Entire A!!reement.
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties hereto. No
waiver, consent, modification or change of terms of this Agreement shall bind any of the Parties
hereto unless in writing signed by all parties, and then such waiver, consent, modification or
change shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose given. There
are no understandings, agreements, representations or warranties, express or implied, not
specified herein regarding this Agreement.
4.9. Further Assurances.
The Parties hereto further agree to execute and deliver such additional documents
and agreements as necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement.
4.10. No Third Party Beneficiaries.
This Agreement is not intended to create any right in or for the public, or any
member of the public, including any subcontractor, supplier or any other third party, or to
. authorize anyone not a party to this Agreement to maintain a suit to enforce or take advantage
of its terms. The duties, obligations and responsibilities of the parties to this Lease with respect
to third parties shall remain as imposed by law.
4
>,
.
~
(
(~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the County have executed this Lease in their
names with their seals hereunder affixed and attested by their duly authorized officers, and the
Library has caused this Agreement to be executed in its name and attested by its duly authorized
officer. All of the above occurred as of the date first written above,
ATTEST:
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Deputy Clerk and Recorder
iga.agr
\
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO
By:
John S. Bennett, Mayor
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
By:
Chair
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
PITKIN COUNTY LIBRARY
By:
Chair
5
("-.
~
Exhibit F
MEMORANDUM
TO:
CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
PITKIN COUNTY
DATE:
MAY 17, 1995
RE:
JAIL SPA REVIEW
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am responding to the concerns raised at your last meeting
regarding the Jail addition project. Questions were raised as to
why the addition was placed on the south side of the building as
opposed to the north side or the placement of the addition as a
second level to the building.
After a couple months of working with Communications, Police
Records and the Jail we found out the needs of these departments
so as to start the floor plan of the addition. It was determined
that the Communications center, currently working in a 426 sf
space, needed more room to house the equipment and employees so
that they might function better for emergency response for the
Roaring Fork Valley.
The current addition of 1500sf is the bare minimum space that we
could add for these departments to make this project worth the
money that we are expending.
Your concern was the location of the addition. When we went
through the pre-planning for the design it was decided to add to
the southwest corner for the following reasons:
closer to Police/Sheriff squad room,
better solar exposure, which reduces energy costs and improves
inhabitability of work space,
less perceived impact to Rio Grande open space, and
better clustering of buildings on campus.
The current Pitkin County Jail was not designed for a second floor
anywhere except the northeast corner above the prisoner cells.
That was for the reasons of adding more residential space for
inmates. The northwest corner is currently the gym and is higher
than the rest of the jail. To add a second floor is too costly for
out budget. We would be required under ADA to add an elevator
which would cost $150,000 to $200,000.
The suggestion of using the current parking lot will not work from
a public safety stand point because of the use of that lot. That
parking lot is primarily for city/County emergency response
vehicles. These vehicles need to be easily accessible in the case
of an emergency. The parking garage does not offer that, neither
does the city parking lot by Obermeyer.
r-,
~\
The basement of the jail is also cost prohibitive. It will cost
well over $180,000 to bring the Jail basement up to code. It
currently is uninhabitable. This $180,000 would be in addition to
any improvement required to place the Communications center.
We understand the concern of losing open space but this is a needed
project without may alternatives. We hope you understand our need.
We would be will to take on the currently unmaintained open space
to the north of the Jail to mitigate this impact.
:)
,
.~
,-'
May 17, 1995
City Council
City of Aspen
130 S, Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Friends,
I appreciate your concerns vis-a-vis the proposed construction to house the Aspen-Pitkin County
Communications Center. I assume that your interests do not focus upon the "whys" related to the project
but upon the "where".
Chief Tom Stephenson, Communications Director Brent Finster, Architect Dave Koenck and I will attend
the public hearing on May 22 to explain the process of decision-making which led to our site selection,
In advance of the hearing, for your edification, lam providing you with a list of important factors
supportive of the proposed site, This list is by no means exhaustive and our "team" should be able to
elaborate upon the total circumstances at the public hearing,
Some prime factors for ~;ite at ~outhwe~t corner of the Pitkin County Jail
. Savings associated with addition to existing building,
. Affmity to Public Safety/Criminal Justice Campus,
. One-level construction,
. Functional ability to control access/egress to the jail.
. Land ownership,
. Relatively small scale (1500 square feet),
. $40,000 in architectural services invested,
. A very limited arrary of options,
I have been told that some of you are concerned about the further usurpation of open-space, So am 1. We
are open to suggestions and want to create the best possible home for the communications staff while
exhibiting fiscal responsibility,
De ~ustibus non e~t di&putandum.
Sincerely,
-~~
z::;>~.
Bob Braudis
AT.I2lalMENl' 1
'-"IAND USE APPL1:CM'ICN RJRM r"\
1) P.roject: NaIw. PITKIN COUNTY JAIL ADDITION.'
2) P.roject IDeation 515 E BLEEKER, ASPEN CO
BLOCK 47.. LOT 1
(indicate ",L.=t ad&. , lot &: block 11I1riv>'t', laJal descciptian ~
awrqriate)
3) P.I:esent ZCl11inJ SPA
4) Lot Size 1.44 ACRES
5) llWlicant's Name, Address &:. B10ne i PITKIN COUNTY, 530 E MAIN, 3RD
ASPEN CO 81611
920-5211
6) Representative's Name, Address &: Rlale i TEMPLE GLASSIER. 530 E MAIN
3RD FL. ASPEN CO 81611
920-5211
7) ~ of 1lWlication (please dlec:k all that aJ;ply) :
_ Conditional Use
-1L ~ SPA
-1L Final: SPA
_ a...~Wal H:ist:to:;i.c De".
_ S,r<>t"'i,,' Review
_ Final H:isl:ar:i.cPev.
--'-' 8040 Greenline
._' 0:l00epI::ual roD
_ Final roo
_ Mi.oor. Histar.i.c :J.i!v.
.'
_ stream MaJ:gin
,_ Histar.i.c. rPnnl ition
!bmt:a.in view Plane . SUbdivi..inn
- . -
-
_ Histar.i.c Designation.
_ OxXIaDiniumization ---'- Text:/Map AllEnllllel.1L
_ Lot Split;IDt Line
AdjusbIalt
"-- G!\'QS 1UlobDent
~ G!\'QS Exeaption
8) Descripti.on of Elcist:iJlg Uses (pmr--. ani. t;ype. .of ex:ist.inq ,:;b:uct"I:'!!S~
approx:ilDate sq. ft. ~ p-"'" of L..dl..........i .any.p:ev:iaJs aa;n:ovals ga.\lt:ed .\r;',' ",iJe
pn:pu:ty) . .
PjtJd'ri'Crmnty ,Tai 1 is one buiJdinc;r that honses 24 inmates. 12
Detention officer, 16 Dispatchers, and 3 Police records people.
There are beds for the inmates.
square feet
9) DeScription of neve], 1"- tt 1q:pli.;at:i.on
Requesting approval for a ~500square foot addition to house
the Communications department and to make the Pitkin County Jail
handicap accessible for the public and the staff that works there.
J.O) Have yoo att:adledthe follcwin;J?
-X- Response to Att>>-I...~tL 2, MinillI.un l':nl-mi"""jon 0:1nt:enl:s
X Response to At+">- J...~,L 3, ~if'il'! l':nl-mi_i<n O:ntent:s
-L- Response to Att:ad1De1t 4, Review st:amams for Your Arp1i<'<ltion
"
"&
r(\\U
- ~
c
~O-
J
I
.
/
/
,
,
.
I
I
\
)
.--
r-
""....,
'. ~' .";
.....,.-..:.
.~J:: ;'~~l~~~;~;';;C<?"
'.l";:"~;<:, ,.. "'.--'
"I' ,:,;'~~, :;.::: H:..
:~..'
I.'
.,.-c::b
~
i
I:
"
..;
.
.
I
II h
'!llll
III
'11111
....,.
11111
.....
I
I
\. . .
I "_~'
L_____ _______il_....,
I .,
. ,
I "
I IP
!!
-------;01 .
....----------- . . II!
I . . 1
.-.."'- .'
I " i
'-----r------li ~I . i
: 1.1."u------4---------- --- ,
-- -,- - - i!: ---li., i
L._H__n ---:;-~~...~ . i
'-r-:'-:'=.--- I 1 ............ i!
J: ---......j..'.......---.......+.---L-..c:;.......... I
~'J I I . I
'. i- ; : :-------1 . I@II
'l~ _ ',_ --n.,-.l.t--.l!-..h
~J :! i Io'Tl /! . \ ! IIII
1.1 j i I L._~____..J ,
I: !! -F-:...-:.----J
hI '. r-- --- I
':1 '<,;. I I I
r~l ~ I 1
iil ."'.., : r-J I ~
!'I I ,__........L --------1 . ..
b'I. . r---~~ _ I..
!!L____-"-__-' ! L. . I 1 r I i
': ' . I ," I.. I .
1 :~..1 l____!_
'--- i "-------------/1 ' I
>'':~~\ I _I ,'. ,," I II
,.~>:,.: "9" I j. I'j
" ..-......~ I " .,
/.....~......~l ~..-Z----:.---7--: .
'ji ",-' '. I .....,'- '... r+,
tv ......~~."'... , ! ''-....,
, "~I ".. II
! ~o
i: / 1111
I
! /
/
I
,
, ' I
I ../.. _,___.
r----.' -,--- .
I ./ I .
I . I
-l-
"
U3IU.C
,'ffJ"""
,
/
I
!
i
{
i
i
m
.,
't!'!'F
t .4:
f"
':' ,...,1.,.
\ .:;
-. .
..1<
1:'
;..-
"
- .....l""""~.::.=
~
~
~
.
;
I
.
.
P.
!.
1""\
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM:
TEMPLE GLASSIER, PROJECT MANAGER
DATE:
MAY 11, 1995
RE:
PITKIN COUNTY JAIL SPA REVIEW
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of the conditions of approval for the Pitkin
addition included a Housing Mitigation Plan and
dedication.
County Jail
Open Space
Housing Mitigation: In 1991, eighteen William Woods units were
constructed by pitkin County. This was not a required employee
housing project. pitkin County is requested to mitigate housing
for 2.1 employees.
Pitkin County has not yet used William Woods units for any housing
mitigation for projects within the City or County. We would
request using Williams Woods as our Housing mitigation for 2.1
employees in the pitkin County Jail addition project.
Open Space Dedication: pitkin County would like to dedicate 1500
square feet of the Vietnam Memorial Park as open space to replace
the 1500 square feet lost by the addition to the jail.
Attached is the parking plan for our required 4.5 parking
mitigation.
1""\
,-"
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Mary Lackner, Planning Office
Cindy Christensen, Housing Office
TO:
DATE:
May 8, 1995
RE:
Pitkin County Jail Addition Conceptual SPA Review
Parcel ID No. 2737-073-47-851
ISSUE:: The County is proposing to add 1,500 additional square feet
to the existing pitkin County Jail to provide more space for the
Communication and Police Record Departments and to provide handicap
access per the American Disabilities Act (ADA). For office use,
the County is planning on using 700 net liveable square feet.
BACKGROUND:
facilities.
The jail would be classified as an essential public
Pursuant to Section 8-104, C, b, (ii):
A development applicant shall demonstrate that the impacts of the essential public facility
will be mitigated, including those associated with the generation of additional employees,
the demand for parking, road and transit services, and the need for basic services
including but not limited to water supply, sewage treatment, drainage control, fire and
policy protection, and solid waste disposal. It shall be demonstrated that the proposed
development has a negligible adverse impact on the city's air, water, land and energy
resources, and is visually compatible with surrounding areas,
RECOMMENDATION: Even though the jail is an essential public
facility, according to Section 8-104, C, b, (ii), the County still
has to mitigate for housing. The following standard shall be used
in calculating the number of full-time equivalent employees
generated by the proposed development:
Office (0):
3.00 employees/I, 000 square feet (net leasable)
3 ~ 1,000 X 700 square feet = 2.1 employees that need to be
mitigated
The Housing Board has established priorities in the Affordable
Housing Guidelines regarding mitigating affordable housing impacts.
The priorities are as follows:
1. On-site housing
2. Off-site housing, including buydown concept
3. Cash-in-lieu/land-in-lieu.
referral\jail.mit
;
\ltl~
~
,.~'
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and city council
Amy Margerum,_city Manager ~
stan Clauso~munity Development
May 8, 1995
Director
THRU:
THRU:
DATE:
RE:
Pitkin county Jail Expansion Final SPA Review and GMQS
Exemption - 1st Reading Ordinance ~~ , 1995
FROM:
Mary Lackner, Planner
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Planning Office and Planning and Zoning Commission
recommends approval of the applicant's request for GMQS Exemption
and Final SPA Amendment to add approximately 1,500 sq. ft. to the
Pitkin County Jail.
APPLICANT: Pitkin County Board of county Commissioners,
represented.by Temple Glassier.
LOCATION/ZONING: Lot 1 of the Pitkin County Center SUbdivision is
a 1.437 acre parcel which contains the Pitkin County Courthouse and
jail facilities. The subject parcel has an SPA (Specially Planned
Area) overlay and is zoned PUB (Public).
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking to add approximately 1,.500
square feet onto the Pitkin County Jail to provide more space for
the Communication and Police Departments, and to add handicapped
access to the jail facility. The addition is proposed as a one-
story structure attached to the jail, between the jail and the
courthouse.
Review of the building plans indicate that the Communications
Center and three offices will be located in this new area in
addition to a small records area.
Please see the attached application for proposed site plan and
building details that are included in Exhibit "A".
PROCESS: This project is being reviewed through the Final SPA
review process, since the addition generally complies with the
Conceptual SPA plan that was approved in 1982, as permitted by
Section 24-7-804(E) (2) of the Aspen Municipal Code. The applicant
is also seeking GMQS Exemption pursuant to section 24-8-
104(C) (1) (b) of the Municipal Code.
BACKGROUND: The 1982 Pitkin County Center S
is attached to the memorandum. There we
1
Jf4r
/?
I.9gs
l
I
I
\- /)~"C{"
\,..../::'"
.~~~.
,,,.7'
Itlt",,,,
'J.', ~~c,~, ,,"'d', q"' ""l ,,1/
~,.:....;;;}.~,'fl
r".
r"..
representations indicated on the plat or in the project files.
The 1982 approvals essentially provided for the construction of the
jail facility that was. finally completed in November 1983.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Complete referral memos are attached to this
memo as the fOllowing exhibits.
Exhibit "B" Engineering
Exhibit "c" Housing Office
Exhibit "D" Parks
The Historic Preservation Officer and Zoning Enforcement Officer
indicated they do not have any concerns with this project and have
not submitted written comments.
CURRENT ISSUES: Staff evaluation of the GMQS Exemption and SPA
Amendment criteria is included in Exhibit "E". The applicant has
not proposed any affordable housing or parking mitigation for the
1,500 sq. ft. of space that is being created. Staff believes that
these items must be mitigated by the County as the GMQS Exemption
for construction of essential community facilities requires
mitigation. To comply with the requirements of the Code, that
applicant needs to provide mitigation for 2.7 employees and 4.5
parking spaces.
The 1982 Pitkin County Center Subdivision SPA Plan did not address
specific enlargement of the jail facility. This proposal is
considered a substantial SPA amendment. Substantial amendments to
an SPA are accomplished by a review of the Planning and Zoning
Commission for their recommendation to City Council through the
Final SPA process.
It should be noted that all dimensional requirements of the PUB
zone district are set by the adoption of the conceptual and final
development plans. As stated previously, these items were not
called out on the Final SPA Plan or in the record of the original
approvals in 1982. The applicant has not proposed to decrease
setbacks or increase parking, however, usable open space will be
decreased.
Due to the pending land trade between the City and the County, the
triangular parcel between the jail and Rio Grande Place will be
transferred to the County. The City Parks Department has
maintained this land, but is seeking the County to take
responsibility of maintenance of all County land around the jail
and courthouse buildings.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office and Planning and Zoning
commission recommend approval of the proposed SPA amendment and
GMQS Exemption to add approximately 1500 square feet of space to
2
I'""
""'"
the jail subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall replace the approximately 1,500 square
feet of lost usable open space on another portion of the
property.
2. The amended SPA Development Plan' shall be recorded in the
office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Failure on
the part of the applicant to record the amended SPA
Development Plan within a period of one hundred and eighty
(180) days following approval by the City Council shall render
the SPA Plan approval invalid and reconsideration and approval
of both by the Commission and city Council will be required
before their acceptance and recording, unless an extension or
waiver is granted by City Council for a showing of good cause.
This plan shall identify the new addition, deli.neate existing
parking spaces, shall show trash, recycle and utility areas,
and bicycle parking areas. This plan shall be approved by the
City Engineer and Planning Office.
3. The architectural plans dated March 1, 1995 and those that
were presented at the April 25th P&Z meeting by Caudill
Gustafson & Associates Architects indicate the location, size,
and height of the proposed addition, and shall be used to
determine the dimensional requirements of this request. Any
changes to these plans will be sUbject to section 24-7-a04(E)
of the Aspen Municipal Code.
4. Snow must not be plowed into the park area north of the jail
as this pushes road gravel into the park and breaks the
sprinkler heads.
The County shall take over maintenance of
irrigation of all property around the jail,
triangle to the north. Parks will facilitate
of this obligation.
6. Prior to 1st reading by City Council, the applicant shall
submit a housing mitigation plan to be reviewed by Planning
and the Housing Office.
5.
landscape and
including the
the switchover
7. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a storm runoff
plan prepared by a registered engineer must be submitted to
the City Engineer. This plan must provide for no more than
historic flows to leave the site as provided for in section
24-7-1004(C) (4) (f) of the city Code.
8. The applicant shall consult with the City Electric
superintendent prior to the issuance of a building permit and
provide electric load information in order to determine if a
transformer easement is need on the site.
3
r-,
,-,
9. The applicant shall agree to J oJ.n any future improvement
districts which may be formed for construction of right-of-
way improvements.
10. The applicant shall consult City Engineering for design
considerations of development wi thin public rights-of-way,
Parks Department for vegetation species, and shall obtain
permits for any work or development, including landscaping,
within public rights-of-way from City streets Department.
11. No tracking of mud onto City streets shall be permitted during
construction.
PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to have first reading of Ordinance .t.3,
1994 for approval of the Pitkin County Center Subdivision SPA
Amendment, GMQS Exemption for a 1,500 sq. ft. addition to the Pitkin
County Jail, subject to the conditions recommended in the May 8,
1995 Planning Office memorandum."
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:
Ordinance L~ series of 1995
Attachments:
blue print drawings of proposed addition
Exhibits:
"An
"B"
"e"
"D"
liE"
Application and maps
Engineering
Housing Office
Parks
SPA Amendment and GMQS Exemption Review criteria
4
,"
~
f"""'-,
..-,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning and Zoning commission
DATE:
April 18, 1995
RE:
Pitkin County Jail Expansion Final SPA Review and GMQS
Exemption
FROM:
Mary Lackner, Planner
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the proposed
Final SPA Development Plan and recommends that an employee
mitigation plan be provided prior to review by city Council.
APPLICANT: Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners,
represented by Temple Glassier.
LOCATION/ZONING: Lot 1 of the Pitkin County Center Subdivision is
a 1.437 acre parcel which contains the pitkin County Courthouse and
jail facilities. The subject parcel has an SPA (Specially Planned
Area) overlay and is zoned PUB (Public).
REQUEST: The applicant is seeking to add approximately 1,500
square feet onto the Pitkin County Jail to provide more space for
the Communication and Police Departments, and to add handicapped
access to the jail facility. The addition is proposed as a one-
story structure attached to the jail, between the jail and the
courthouse.
Review of the building plans indicate that the Communications
Center and three offices will be located in this new area in
addition to a small records area.
Please see the attached application for proposed site plan and
building details that are included in Exhibit "A".
PROCESS: This project is being reviewed through the Final SPA
review process, since the addition generally complies with the
Conceptual SPA. plan that was approved in 1982, as permitted by
section 24-7-804(E) (2) of the Aspen Municipal Code. The applicant
is also seeking GMQS Exemption pursuant to section 24-8-
104(C) (1) (b) of the Municipal Code.
The Planning Commission shall forward a recommendation to city
Council for the Final SPA Plan and GMQS Exemption for essential
public facilities.
BACKGROUND: The 1982 Pitkin County Center Subdivision SPA Plan
is attached to the memorandum. There were no conditions or
representations indicated on the plat or in the project files.
1
"
r-.
^
The 1982 approvals essentially provided for the construction of the
jail facility that was finally completed in November 1983.
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Complete referral memos are attached to this
memo as the following exhibits.
Exhibit "B" Engineering
Exhibit "c" Housing Office
Exhibit "D" Parks
The Historic Preservation Officer and Zoning Enforcement Officer
indicated they do not have any concerns with this project and have
not submitted written comments.
PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS: The 1982 Pitkin County Center Subdivision
SPA Plan did not address specific enlargement of the jail facility.
This proposal is considered a substantial SPA amendment.
Substantial amendments to an SPA are ~ccomplished by a review of
the Planning and Zoning commission for their recommendation to City
Council through the Final SPA process.
It should be noted that all dimensional requirements of the PUB
zone district are set by the adoption of the conceptual and final
development plans. As stated previously, these items were not
called out on the Final SPA Plan or in the record of the original
approvals in 1982. The applicant has not proposed to decrease
setbacks or increase parking, however, usable open space will be
decreased.
specially
standards
Municip~l
Planned
are set
Code:
Area Review Criteria: The following review
forth in section 24-7-804 (B) of the Aspen
1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with
or enhances the mix of development in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use,
density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping
and open space.
Response: The architecture of the proposed addition will be
similar to that of the existing jail structure. The public nature
of the land use is compatible with the surrounding public uses.
The addition is proposed to be approximately 15 feet high, whereas
the existing jail is about 24 feet high.' The total building
coverage of this parcel will increase approximately 2.5%.
There are presently 24 parking spaces on the property and the
applicant is not proposing to add any additional parking. Staff
recommends that a bicycle parking area with racks be provided on
2
.
.~
~
site to encourage the use of alternative transportation.
2. Whether sufficient pUblic facilities and roads exist
to service the proposed development.
Response:
vicinity.
Public facilities and roads are adequate in the
3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is
generally suitable for development, considering the
slope; ground instability and the possibility of mud
flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood
hazards.
Response: No hazards exist for the proposed addition, as it is
located in a gently sloping area between two existing structures.
4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs
land planning techniques to preserve significant
view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts
and provide open space, trails and similar amenities
for the users of the project and the pUblic at
large.
Response: There is a trail connection and easement on this
property that will not be impacted. The addition is being located
in the most usable open space on the parcel. The applicant has not
proposed to replace this open space elsewhere on the property.
Staff recommends that approximately 1,500 square feet of usable
open space be provided elsewhere on the parcel. There will be no
adverse environmental impacts as a result of this development.
5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance
with the Aspen Area Community Plan.
3
.1"""\
1"""\
7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of
twenty percent (20%) meet the slope reduction and
density requirements of Sec. 7-903(B) (2) (b);
Response: All development is proposed on slopes of less than 20%.
8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the
proposed development.
Response: GMQS exemptlon is sought for this application. Staff
has reviewed this in the following section and recommends that an
employee mitigation plan be submitted prior to review by City
Council.
GMQS Exemption for Construction of essential public facilities:
This provision of the Aspen Municipal Code is an exemption before
City council. Staff has included it in this memo to provide the
applicant with issues that will be raised at the Council meeting,
and also to provide the Commission with an understanding of how
GMQS is addressed.
The criteria for section 24-8-104(C) (1) (b) follows:
(ii) Except for housing, development shall be considered
an essential public facility if it serves an essential
public purpose, provides facilities in response to the
demands of growth, is not itself a growth generator, is
available for use by the general public, and serves the
needs of the city. It shall also be taken into
consideration whether the development is a not-for::profit
venture. This exemption shall not be applied to
commercial or lodge development.
Response: The Communication Department and the jail are clearly
public facilities for the benefit of City and County residents.
(ii) A development applicant shall demonstrate that the
impacts of the essential public facility will be
mitigated, including those associated with the generation
of additional employees, the demand for parking, road and
transit services, and the need for basic services
including but not limited to water supply, sewage
treatment, drainage control, fire and police protection,
and solid waste disposal. It shall also be demonstrated
that the proposed development has a negligible adverse
impact on the city's air, water, land and energy
resources, and is visually compatible withsurr.ounding
areas. J
Response: The Communication Department has
employees in 1988 to 14 employees in 1995.
increased from 12
The applicant has
4
,~
,'-"
indicated that no new employees are generated by this request for
additional space and is therefore not proposing any employee
mitigation. The city has consistently applied the housing
mitigation requirements to all private developers within the City
of Aspen based on the new square footage generated.
Based on the requirements of section 24-8-104 (C) (b) (ii) of the
Aspen Municipal Code, the following standard shall be used to
calculate the. number of full-time equivalent emPIOyee~e
generated by the proposed development: ~
Office (0) : 3.00 employeesj1,000 sq. ft. (net leasable)
The applicant is proposing 1,500 sq. ft. which would generate 4.5
employees. The Code requires that 60% ef employees generated by
mi tigated by providing any of the following: on-si te housing, off-
site housing including the buydown concept, cash-in-lieu, or land-
in-lieu. This addition requires~ 1 pmnloyees to be mitigated.
The applicant has not proposed any additional parking spaces with
the new development, although there are 18 outdoor and 6 indoor
spaces on the property. A 1,500 sq. ft. addition in the 0 (Office)
zone district would require~parking spaces to be provided on-
site or mitigated at $15,000 per space. Dimensional requirements
are determined in the Final SPA plan. The planning Commission
should made a specific recommendation to City Council on the
provision of off-street parking spaces for this project. Staff
believes that the applicant should also provide a bicycle parking
area for use by the public and employees of the courthouse and jail
facility.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the
proposed SPA amendment to add approximately 1500 square feet of
space to the jail subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall replace the approximately 1,500 square
feet of lost usable open space on another portion of the
property.
2. The amended SPA Development Plan shall be recorded in the
office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Failure on
the part of the applicant to record the amended SPA
Development Plan within a period of one hundred and eighty
(180) days following approval by the city council shall render
the SPA Plan approval invalid and reconsideration and approval
of both by the Commission and City Council will be required
before their acceptance and recording, unless an extension or
waiver is granted by city Council for,'a showing of good cause.
I
This plan shall identify the new addition, delineate existing
parking spaces, shall show trash, recycle and utility areas,
and bicycle parking areas. This plan shall be approved by the
5
~,
, '
,'"'
city Engineer and Planning Office.
,[#',
~1'
/
'J/~
tJ. ,../Y'y I!-J 2S
,.,t-'f(,. 1'1' .
, ffZ~
I.
-
3. The architectural plans dated March 1, 1995 by Caudill
Gustafson & Associates Architects indicate the location, size,
and height of the proposed addition, and shall be used to
determine the dimensional requirements of this request. Any
changes to these plans will be subject to section 24-7-804(E)
of the Aspen Municipal Code.
4. Snow must not be plowed into the park area north of the jail
as this pushes road gravel into the park and breaks the
sprinkler heads.
5. The county shall take over maintenance of landscape and
irrigation of all property around- the jail, including the
triangle to the north. Parks will facilitate the switchover
of this obligation.
6. Prior to 1st reading by City Council, the applicant shall
submit a housing mitigation plan to be reviewed by Planning
and the Housing Office.
7. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a storm runoff
plan prepared by a registered engineer must be submitted to
the City Engineer. This plan must provide for no more than
historic flows to leave the site as provided for in section
24-7-1004(C) (4) (f) of the City Code.
8. The applicant shall consult with the city Electric
Superintendent prior to the issuance of a building permit and
provide electric load information in order to determine if a
transformer easement is need on the site.
9. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement
districts which may be formed for construction of right-of-
way improvements.
10. The applicant shall consult City Engineering for design
considerations of development within public rights-of-way,
Parks Department for vegetation species, and shall obtain
permits for any work or development, including landscaping,
within public rights-of-way from City Streets Department.
11. No tracking of mud onto City streets shall be permitted during
construction.
_ j-1flhu.l (~arlf;"f If)JJ'f,~ oId-e,)
_ TMII/o:;A ~ak/l t<! ru!;wrd hI(;.r
- s+.b b{~. (fJuk'-"
- Jiw...v yoo-6 fI-'WIOJcJ)
reyv.s -kJJ by jrMfJ / YOvfh {M1-er
f 114Z4- --,j;;, !-p,,,,'!:; f
>>evtrfr-o/lJ .
6
('Sli 7 ~ 4J"W(~M - Mr" /LOf- ok vv/)
"
t"\,
.~
. ~,
Exhibit B
MEMORANDUM
To: Mary Lackner, Planning Office
From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department (l,12-.
Date: April 12, 1995
Re: Pitkin County Jail Addition SPA Development Review
(515 East Bleeker Street, Lot 2, Pitkin County Center Subdivision)
Having reviewed the above referenced application, the Engineering Department has the following
comments:
I, Site Drainage - The application does not discuss site drainage, If the project is approved, a
storm runoff plan must be prepared by a registered engineer prior to issuance of a building permit.
The plan must provide for no more than historic flows to leave the site as provided for in Section
24-7-1004,CA,fofthe City Code,
2, Utilities - Any new surface utility needs for pedestals or other equipment must be installed on
an easement provided by the applicant and not in the public right-of-way, The applicant must
consult with the City Electric. Superintendent prior to issuance of a building permit and provide
electric load information in order to determine if a transformer easement is needed on the site,
3, Trash & Utility Area - The final development plans must indicate the trash storage area, which
may not be in the public right-of-way, All trash storage areas should be indicated as trash ill1d
recycle areas. Any trash and recycle areas that include utility meters or other utility equipment
must provide that the utility equipment not be blocked by trash and recycle containers,
4, Parking - The application does not state how many employees currently work in the
Communication and Records Departments. A statement in writing should be required in order to
track the representation about not increasing employee numbers. A condition of approval should be
that if additional employees are added to the space in the future that parking will be provided for or
cash-in-lieu provided,
1
'';
,-..
.-.
;
5. Site Design - The City and the County have been working together for some time regarding land
ownerships in the vicinity and deed exchanges, including the library, the parking garage, and the
Youth Center, There is a parcel of City property behind the jail which would be a preferable
location for the proposed addition, The proposed addition would greatly detract from the quality of
the existing open space that is an important part of the ambiance of the library, parking plaza,
Youth Center, jail and Courthouse, It is recommended that the land exchange be completed and the
addition constructed on the back side, the Rio Grande Place side of the jail. The application does
not propose subgrade development which would also help in reducing above grade impacts and
bulk, Subgrade spaces are "specially suitable for storage,
6, Bike Racks - These are not discussed and perhaps should be required.
7, Other Conditions of A.pproval -
a, No tracking of mud onto City streets shall be permitted during construction,
b. The applicant shall agree to join any improvement districts formed for the purpose of
constructing improvements in adjacent public rights-of-way.
8. Work in the Public Right-of-way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as
follows:
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5088) for design considerations of
development within public rights-of-way, parks department (920-5120) for
vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including
landscaping, within public rights-of-way from city streets department (920-5130),
cc: Cris Caruso
John Worcester
Temple Glassier
M95.90
2
"
H~~.l~ .~~ ~:~~HM
.... i
~,
,-.
Exhibit D
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
:RE:
Mary Lackner, Planning Off=
Tom Rulx;l, Irrigation ('.oordinatQr
April 12, 1995
Pitlcin County Jail Addition COIlceptultl SPA Review
The Parks Department has reviewed the plans for the Pitkin County Jail Addition and bas the
following concerns:
1)
Provision needs to be lt1IIde for pn.:s of snow from plowing. Snow must not
be plowed into lhe park area north of the jail a:; this pushes road gravel into the
park and brelIk:s the sprinkler head.~
The County needs to take over maintt::oIlnci: of landscape lll1d inig.ation of all
~erty aroumi the jail. idcluding the triangle to th<: north. Parks will fucilitate the
SWllchover of this obligation,
2)
1
"""'
r-.
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Mary Lackner
From: Cindy Christensen
Postmark: Apr 07,95 1:44 PM
Status: Previously read
Subject: Reply to: Jail Expansion
Reply text:
From Cindy Christensen:
I have no record at all of the jail. Sorry!
Preceding message:
From Mary Lackner:
Does the Housing office have any record from the original approvals
that state how many employees were generated/created/employed by the
Jail? I would like to see some kind of comparison. I have been
looking on my end and cannot find these numbers, and I'm hoping you
have some better records. Thanks
-------========x========-------
APR 07 '95 07:37AM ASPE~ING OFC
P.i
,,-...
Exhibit C
. MDO~ma
FROH:
Mary Lackner, Planning Office
Cindy Christensen, aoJsing Office
April 7, 1995
Pitkin Countv Jail Adqition Conceptual SPA Review
Parcel ~D No~ 2737-07~-47-851
TO:
DATE:
RBI
:tSS'D'lI: The County is proposing tIC a.dd 1,500 additional square feet
to the existing pitkin county o1_il to provide more space for the
Communication and Police Record Jj~partmenta and to provide handicap
access per the American Disabilities Act (ADA).
BACKGROUND: The jail would be classified as an essential public
facilities. PUrsuant to Section 8-104, C, b, (ii):
A development applicant shall demonetrateJthat the impacts of the essential public facility
wll1 bJ;! mitigated, including thOGEl associate. with the generation of additional emplcyees,
the demand for parking, read and transit services, and the need for basic servicea
including but not 6mited to water SUPPly, iewage treatment, drainage conlrol, fi~ and
policy protection, and solid waste disposal, It shall be demonstrated that the proposed
development has a neg6gible adverse impact on the city'a air, water, land and energy
resources, and is visually compatible with surrounding areas,
R,Jj!I"I'IMM'Rlma'nON: ,Even though the j ail is an essential public
facility, according to Sec~ion 8-104, C, b, (ii) , the County still
has to mitigate for housing. ThE! following sta.ndard shall be used
in calculating the number of full-time equivalent employees
generated by the proposed devel~pment:
Office (0):
3. 00 eti!ploy~s/J., 000 squat's feet. (net leasable)
3 + 1,000 X 1,500 square feet ~ 4,5 employees that need to be
mitigated
The Housing Board has establisped priorities in the Affordable
Housing Guidelines regarding mit~gating affordable housing impacts.
The priorities are as follows!
1. On-site housing
2. Off-site housing, inc1uding buydown concept
3. Cash-in-lieu/land-in-lieu.
referral\jai1amit
1"""\
'-',
Exhibit E
Specially Planned Area Review criteria
The following review standards are set forth in section 24-7-
804(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code:
1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with
or enhances the mix of development in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use,
density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping
and open space.
Response: The architecture of the proposed addition will be
similar to that of the existing jail structure. The public nature
of the land use is compatible with the surrounding public uses.
The addition is proposed to be approximately 15 feet high, whereas
the existing jail is about 24 feet high. The total building
coverage of this parcel will increase approximately 2.5%.
There are presently 24 parking spaces on the property and the
applicant is not proposing to add any additional parking. Staff
recommends that a bicycle parking area with racks be provided on
site to encourage the use of alternative transportation.
2. Whether Sufficient public facilities and roads exist
to service the proposed development.
Response:
vicinity.
Public facilities and roads are adequate in the
3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is
generally suitable for development, considering the
slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud
flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood
hazards.
Response: No hazards exist for the proposed addition, as it is
located in a gently sloping area between two existing structures.
4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs
land planning techniques to preserve significant
view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts
and provide open space, trails and similar amenities
for the users of the project and the public at
large.
Response: There is a trail connection and easement on this
property that will not be impacted. The addition is being located
in the most usable open space on the parcel. The applicant has not
proposed to replace this open space elsewhere on the property.
Staff recommends that approximately 1,500 square feet of usable
open space be provided elsewhere on the parcel. There will be no
adverse environmental impacts as a result of this development.
5
i""'\
,-.,
-.
S. Whether the proposed development is in compliance
with the Aspen Area Community Plan.
Response: The Aspen Area Community Plan does not make specific
recommendations regarding a project of this type.
6. Whether the proposed development will require the
expenditure of excessive public funds to provide
public facilities for the parcel, or the surround-
ing neighborhood.
Response: Pitkin County will be using public funds to construct
the addition. One result of the project will be to bring the
Pitkin County Jail into conformance of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) by providing a handicap access ramp to the
entrance.
The City Parks Department has recommended that the County take over
the landscape maintenance responsibilities around the jail. This
is recommended as a condition of approval.
7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of
twenty percent (20%) meet the slope reduction and
density requirements of Sec. 7-903(B) (2) (b).
Response: All development is proposed on slopes of less than 20%.
8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the
proposed development.
Response: GMQS exemption is sought for this application. staff
has reviewed this in the following section and recommends that an
employee mitigation plan be submitted prior to review by city
Council.
6
1"""\
,-.,
'.
GMQS Exemption for Construction of Essential PUblic Facilities
This provision of the Aspen Municipal Code is an exemption before
City Council. Staff has included it in this memo to provide the
applicant with issues that will be raised at the Council meeting,
and also to provide the Commission with an understanding of how
GMQS is addressed.
The criteria for section 24-8-104(C) (1) (b) follows:
(ii) Except for housing, development shall be considered
an essential public facility if it serves an essential
public purpose, provides facilities in response to the
demands of growth, is not itself a growth generator, is
available for use by the general pUblic, and serves the
needs of the city. It shall also be taken into
consideration whether the development is a not-for=profit
venture. This exemption shall not be applied to
commercial or lodge development.
Response: The Communication Department and the jail are clearly
public facilities for the benefit of City and county residents.
(ii) A development applicant shall demonstrate that the
impacts of the essential public facility will be
mitigated, including those associated with the generation
of additional employees, the demand for parking, rolildand
transit services, and the need for basic services
including but not limited to water supply, sewage
treatment, drainage control, fire and police protection,
and solid waste disposal. It shall also be demonstrated
that the proposed development has a negligible adverse
impact on the city's air, water, land and energy
resources, and is visually compatible with surrounding
areas.
Response: The Communication Department has increased from 12
employees in 1988 to 14 employees in 1995. The applicant has
indicated that no new employees are generated by this request for
additional space and is therefore not proposing any employee
mitigation. The City has consistently applied the housing
mitigation requirements to all private developers within the city
of Aspen based on the new square footage generated.
Based on the requirements of section 24-8-104 (C) (b) (ii) of the
Aspen Municipal Code, the following standard shall be used to
calculate the number of full-time equivalent employees that are
generated by the proposed development:
Office (0) : 3.00 employees/l,OOO sq. ft. (net leasable)
7
.1""'\
,-.,
The applicant is proposing 1,500 sq. ft. which would generate 4.5
employees. The Code requires that 60% of employees generated be
mitigated by providing any of the following: on-site housing, off-
site housing including the buydown concept, cash-in-lieu, or land-
in-lieu. This addition requires 2.7 employees to be mitigated.
The applicant has not proposed any additional parking spaces with
the new development, although there are 18 outdoor and 6 indoor
spaces on the property. A 1,500 sq. ft. addition in the 0 (Office)
zone district would require 4.5 parking spaces to be provided on-
site or mitigated at $15,000 per space. Dimensional requirements
are determined in the Final SPA plan. The Planning Commission
should made a specific recommendation to city Council on the
provision of off-street parking spaces for this project. Staff
believes that the applicant should also provide a bicycle parking
area for use by the public and employees of the courthouse and jail
facility.
8
""'"
~
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Mary Lackner
From: Leslie Lamont
Postmark: Mar 29,95 8:38
Status: Previously read
Subject: jail expansion
AM
Urgent
Message:
according to debbie the county has not yet paid us for their land use
review. please inform them that we will not go to P&Z until they pay
us (they owe us alot of money and we never can get reimbUrsed) thanks
-------========x========-------
. .'.C" c'-'''.~...."''~,..."..,," ~"'''_'''._"''~_~''"'_~__'''''., .;_ ..::.:.,_--:....'__-'".., :._~;,_,.~.~.~.,~'":...: .. ;-...-,.~'''''.-_''o.-;.o'''''----':O'~'_.....
("""\ .-.,
ASPEN/PITKlN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S.Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920-5090 FAX# (303) 920-5197
March 15, 1995
Temple Glassier
Pitkin County
530 E. Main St., 3rd Floor
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Pitkin County Jail Addition Conceptual SPA Review
Case A25-95
Dear Temple,
The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We
have determined that this application is complete.
We have scheduled this application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
on Tuesday, April 18, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. Should this date be
inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter, After
that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the
application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the
meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application
is available at the Planning Office.
If you have any questions, please call Mary Lackner, the planner assigned to your case, at 920-
5106. '
Sincerely,
';;~fLhN.-
Suzanne L. Wolff
Administrative Assistant
Corma:apz.no.ph
i""'"
,-.,
" ,
, .
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Ap,plication Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Pd--tl V) (1uVlhj
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for
Jax I ~ddL'hOYl SPA- f)e/v~io bVYLf..-P1/-a;;Le>>J
(hereinafter, HE PROJECT). I
2, APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance
No. 77 (Series of 1992) establishes a fee structure for Planning Office applications
and the payrnent of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination
of application cornpleteness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or
scope of the proposed project,. it is not possible ,at this tirne to ascertain the full
extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and
CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT
to make payrnent of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to
be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be
benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments
upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred.
CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full
costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for
CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the
Planning Commission and/or City Council to enablethePlllnning Commission
and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless
current billings are paid in full prior to decision.
1"""\
---
.,
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's
waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application
completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $
which is for _ hours of Planning Office tirne, and if actual recorded costs
exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to
CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned
above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made
within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay
such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing.
CITY OF ASPEN
APPLICANT
~
By: ' · . ~
Diane Moore
City Planning Director
By' \/1~rx1/){f/)
Mailing Ad es . .
630 &!v1 CL.</r), (, r~~, 6/ bf/
Date: s- ~>9.::,
2
~
.~
ASPEN/PITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone 920-5090 FAX 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Attorney
Housing Director
Parks Department
Zoning Administration
HPC - Amy Amidon
Mary Lackner, Planner
Pitkin County Jail Addition Conceptual SPA Review
Parcel ID No. 2737-073-47-851
March 15, 1995
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Pitkin County.
Please return your comments to me no later than April 3,
Thank you.
.r-
,r-"
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Mary Lackner
From: Temple Glassier
Postmark: Mar 15,95 4:26 PM
Status: Previously read
subject: Reply to: Jail Application
Reply text:
From Temple Glassier:
i will have the present square footage tomorrow
2 - 14 employees at communications
3 - tomorrow
4 - original approvals 6/82
gq- /2.,S
88 - 1'1..,0
Preceding message:
From Mary Lackner:
I need the fOllowing information for this application: 1) what is the
present square footage of the jail building 2) # of people employeed
in the communications. department 3) list of adjacent property owners
for 300 feet 4) date of original approvals for the jail.
Please get me this stuff as soon as possible. Thanks
-------========x========-------
("'f41 SftvW
I ~ lJv+s;Jt
to "/lsiJ!
(".
March 8, 1995
Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office
130 S Galena Street
Aspen CO 81611
,,.....,,
Pitkin County
RE: PITKIN COUNTY JAIL ADDITION SPA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
To Whom It May Concern:
Applicant:
pitkin County Commissioners
530 E Main Street, 3rd Floor
Aspen CO 81611
303-920-5200
Representative:
Temple L. Glassier
Project Manager
530 E Main Street, 3rd Floor
Aspen CO 81611
303-920-5211
Sincerely,
PITKIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
:./J ~~ ..
~;:X L~ ~~
Temple L. Gla17s'er,' roject Manager
Administration
530 E, Main. 3rd Floor
Aspen, CO 8161 1
(303) 920-5200
FAX 920-5198
@ printed on recycled paper
County Commissioners
SuileB
506 Eo Main Street
Aspen, CO 8161 1
(303) 92Q.5150
County Attorney
Su~el
530 E. Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
(303) 920-5190
Personnel and Finance
SuileF
530 E. Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
(303) 920.5220
Transportation
Facilities
76 Service Center Road
Aspen, C081611
(303) 920-5390
r-"
,-,.
March 7, 1995
Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Pitkin County
.",
RE: PITKIN COUNTY JAIL ADDmON SPA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
To Whom It May Concern:
Please accept this letter as Pitkin County's formal submission materials for the Addition to the
Pitkin County Jail to be constrUcted this year,
APPROVAL PROCESS AND SUBMISSION CONTENTS
Pitkin County, as developer of the project, is required to submit the project to review in
accordance with the City of Aspen Land Use Code Sections 8-104 (C)(1)(b), 7-903 (B) and
SPA Development Application. The project can be summarized as follows:
1) PITKIN COUNTY JAn. ADDITION: Pitkin County proposes to add 1500 additional
square feet to the existing Pitkin County Jail to provide. more space for the
Communication and Police Record Departments and for handicap access to the Pitkin
County Jail. Attached as Exhibit A is a more detailed description of the proposed
improvements.
COMPLIANCE WITH POUCIES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS
The following is a description of how the project complies with the policies and general
regulations of the Land Use Code:
8-104 (C)(l)(b) Exemption by city council- ConstrUction of essential public facility
The Pitkin County Jail, 515 E Bleeker, currently houses three public departments;
Aspen/Pitkin County Communications, Aspen/Pitkin County Police Records and the
Pitkin County Jail. These departments are essential to Pitkin Couilty and the City of
Aspen. These departments serve the needs of the City of Aspen for emergency response
and public safety of the general public.
This development is not associated with growth of employees but with growth of
services. . The current communication department is housed in 456 square feet in the
middle of the jail. This is not adequate space for the equipment and people to perform
the duties that Communications is currently performing for Pitkin County, the City of
Aspen and other entities within the Roaring Fork Valley, This development will not
generate the need for additional parking, road and transit services, or basic service
needs. The addition will be visually compatible with the surrounding Courthouse
Campus,
1
Administration
530 e, Main. 3rd Roor
Aspen, CO 81611
(303) 920-5200
FAX 920-5198
@ printed on recycled paper
County Commissioners
Su~e B
606 E, Main Street
Aspen, CO 8161 1
(303) 920-5150
County Anomey
Suite I
530 e, Main Street
Aspen. CO 8161 1
(303) 920-5190
Personnel and Finance
SuiteF
530 e, Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
(303) 920-5220
Transportation
Facilities
76 Service Center Road
Aspen, CO 81 611
(303) 920-5390
!""\
,r\,
7-903 (B)
Construction of essential public facilities:
The development is for growth of the Communication Department in a matter of
equipment and handicap accessibility. The Communications department serves the public
as an information and emergency response center.
This addition will be constructed due to the growth in the equipment needed to run this
facility and the need for handicap accessibility to the Pitkin County Jail. There will not
be an increase in the employee base, therefore no need for additional parking, rulid and
transit services.
The Pitkin County Jail fits the description of an essential public facility, as it is used to
provide services essential to the health, safety an welfare of the residents and visitors
of Pitkin County.
,
SPA Development Application - Attachment 4
1. The proposed development is compatible with the immediate vicinity of the parcel in
terms of land use, density, height, bulk architecture, landscaping and open space. This
is only an addition to the current Pitkin County Jail which is part of the Courthouse
campus, All the buildings around the Jail are public facilities. The height, bulk and
architecture will be the exact replica of the existing building, Landscaping will be
preformed to put the Jail yard back the way it currently is.
2. The facility will use the public facilities and roads that currently exist. All are sufficient
for this relatively small addition.
3. The proposed development is on a parcel with less than 20% slope. There will not be
the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche danger and flood hazards.
4. The proposed development is a small addition that fills in a comer of the existing Jail.
There will not be an impact on view plans or an adverse environmental impact. There
is be a minimal impact on open space.
S. The proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Community Plan.
There is not any designated open space within the Courthouse Campus. This addition
to the Jail will not disturb the special character of the historic district. The Aspen Area
Community Plan doesn't specifically address public facilities.
6. This proposed development will not require excessive public funds but will provide a
public facility that will conform to the physical requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). Currently, public access to the Pitkin County Jail does not
conform to the ADA requirements.
7. The parcel on which the development will be happening is. less that 20% slope so
maximum density is allowed. .
8. The project proposes to be exempt from the GMQS allotment requirements because:
2
.'
',,:
1"""\
1"""\.
a) it is planned to be a public facility owned and operated by Pitkin County,
Colorado, a public entity; .
b) no new employees will be added to the Communications department because
of this project. The improvements are being done to adequately house the
existing equipment and to conform with the requirements of the ADA.
This concludes the application submission for this project. Thank you for accepting this
application. If you have any questions concerning the application, or require further
information, please contact me at 920-521l.
Sincerely,
PITKIN COUNTY PUBUC WORKS AGENCY
~~jQ/~
Temple L!~J.assitr, ~ject Manager
3
5 i r! Plo....-...,
,
~
I
/
/
./
-,
~
-
>
--
-
~~\
--- -','
::- -..\ \.\
- --=- -=::'I~\
\~
'--
, i I
I
, I
I
\:
\ I
I
\
)
\
r\
. 'I
I '\
I I
;' !
J
" ,> I~ '1 ;
, /' J \:1 !
r-- /!
\. --~~- - - - _II i ,_:_~=-=~ I :ff.O
1 \(~---~."" r- ~~~e, If
. ) .1 (k, j~L/
J
I I
/
t\
r
-
---
-,-
--
--
.,
\
/
/
I
I
\
\
1
I
c
,
,
/
I
/
/
,-
,
il3i -;- l~i! i~~i ~ !:.
~J , Hif' ~ "~!~!j ;;
h# ,,' .. '!~ Ii .
t :'" 'lJI f
'Ii::: t; ,..1 t"'. ~',.r.; "I;' !!
;:?~ :'hi. ..
I;.,' .1. I! ~ ~l
~ 11,1 ,:. :::i , ""' ,
. i'" ~ ..~g ! =:: t!
~ok;~~ g;.- ~ 8_ ~~
i~~r; p !~i ~ \ jil-j!
I., ~ ;'H I' ..
.., . ~.. I, .'
.. :l ..... "1-'-
~0' . .;
,'..,.":
~... ."
';:"::';:
,:~
r~ ':, '
i~-
'."..'" :,-.' ~
~", :.~"~
'I: :' ,l"
~.. ~:;;
~ ~ ~~
~ ',.I .
~;, .
~
-of
"
Z
n
0
c
Z
-of
1\ -< .
a i~ . S n ~
II , ; ~ ,
Ii l'\ ~
:0
. (f)
., C
al
0
<:
Vi
is
z
.
.,
,
,
~~ Ii
, t~ .'
! ~i II
ll~ liift "
~I f I irl
i .~ I
. !, ,lit
i .~ ~
,,:-~,
ar.;-.
, ...Il.'f..f......,.".."..........,..'". "
f .... ~ ::- ..':.~~..: ;....;;:~~"...z"..~~::.so.....~l~ ..
'I" ,". .,..,.,.. '_'"'M"'" ....J. , ,
.. h !jr u.;, ..a..p='.:i:&,llc"-n..2.c":a...L I:;
l . ~I'f!, n:lu!i.ir2:;....I..:..=a-:::!:I..:;:~;~~!: I~
i ,,1'1"""" ..., ,-,.",. ."""'.1 '.
.t ..t"garhi','li;2"'g- ".I: .2 .. .....,.-....~
. III ......., I f.... H.'.."'.".,.-", 1$
i · tJtf.~.lti,.fiil.:,;;i;':!~:;I;.[:l~.::, JI
" i jll" -;jhlf'1,!';i~jji;i~~1[~i?;ii';~!i
E liltj'..-. =, 4':.'~rt!=t~:. ~::::. :~~J"H ..
~ . L1 f t!f~f i -'fi'::!:'l".i",:~,!,:I,! Ii
I':: i fill Ii Alf".( ~~.:. "l.rl~"'" .... ii
ii' i itf"." -h' 'f"h1i'i..'j:I'lifi"':; ~
~ . ~l.,ri'll~'lll"il;! Ii !;:~;rl.r,!.~:rl'i;~~; :1
I .. .. :r"~1 l=i!:O~ _us_' :::. U't ~","~:::' j
! ~ i~f..i"iU'ut fl~fJl~ll.it,~!(~I~~;:~I:
, 1: , ir~I'i!J~lid;,;~.qrtH~;1~~!m~H!
, .' 'rf.npf"fr"d'Ju "I' ""Ih, ,l.'
~ " .
.' :~': I'
· '-^1." l
. 11.;' , .' . ~.;::;. ~..'!\.:'
~ ..:::..~.- '-"b" ~'~"~'f
I
~
!
..j..
~ Q:)
:P g
~ ~
m -
c.. I,)oa
VJ
~ Foot t-Q.ct~.0<, ~ G~
RIO GRANDE PARK
CITY OF ASPEN
130 S GALENA
ASPEN CO 81611
DRACO INC
210 N MILL
ASPEN CO 81611
BCS PROPERTIES
HOWARD BASS
PO BOX 5078
ASPEN CO 81612
LOUIS ZAPANCIS
540 E MAIN
ASPEN CO 81611
MERRILEE & JIM AUSTER
PO BOX 4771
ASPEN CO 81612
GAlLEN SMITH
PO BOX 241
SNOWMASS CO 81615
GEORGE MURPHY
PO BOX 4146
ASPEN CO 81612
CNB
950 - 17TH ST #1250
DENVER CO 80202
LEWIS SCHAlNUCK
3650 SOUTH ST, STE 301
LAKEWOOD CA 90712
GALENA PLAZA, LLC
LOWELL MEYER
PO BOX 1247
ASPEN CO 81612
KLAUS OBERMEYER
PO BOX 130
ASPEN CO 81612
PITKIN CTY CAPITAL LEASING CORP
530 E MAIN
ASPEN CO 81611
JANE DUNLAP
600 E MAIN #401
ASPEN CO 81611
~,
1"""\
1"""\
RALPH DORAN
2500 WOODWARD WAY
ATLANTA GA 30305
ALH HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
435 W MAIN
ASPEN CO 81611
WILLIAM DAVID ARNETT
BETTE LEE ARNETT
5333 N CAMINO REAL
TUCSON AZ 85718
REUBEN & EDITH CHERNIACK
2800 S UNIVERSITY BLVD #137
DENVER CO 80210
JOHN SOMMER
5094 ARENIDA HACIENDA
TARZANA CA 91356
MARCIA FOSTER
GLENNA FOSTER-SEIPP
3215 TARRY HOLLOW DR
AUSTIN TX 78703
RICHARD COPPOCK
PO BOX 44
DEXTER MI 48131
RICHARD & KATHRYN ARNOLD
14 RIVERRIDGE TRAIL
ORMOND BEACH FL 32174
MARTHA FOSTER
PO BOX 585608
DALLAS TX 75258
SHARON PRIOR
PO BOX 656
ASPEN CO 81612
JOHN HOBAN
5406 N BRIAN RIDGE CIR
MCKINNEY TX 75070
DONALD & MARIE HEYS
2495 ADARE
ANN ARBOR MI 48104
RKJR PROPERTIES LTD
5934 ROYAL LN, STE 255
DALLAS TX 75230
.1""'\
1""'\
AUSTINE FINANCIAL CO
6692 MANCHESTER BLVD
BUENA PARK CA 90621
BART MAESTRANZI
1101 N WESTERN
PARK RIDGE IL 60068
DAVID KIDDER
3928 UNIVERSITY BLVD
DALLAS TX 75205
GRETCHEN & MICHELE HENRICKS
WILLIAM & DEBORAH HENRICKS
PO BOX 9403
ASPEN CO 81612
JEAN-PAUL AUBE
522 ALGONQUIN BLVD EAST
TIMMIN ONTARIO CANADA P4N1B7
MCGAFFEY FAMILY & CO NO.C
777 E WISCONSIN AVE., STE 3600
MILWAUKEE WI 53202
CLARK FICKE
15 W ARRELLAGA ST, #3
SANTA BARBARA CA 93101
KATHLEEN MANN
PO BOX 2057
ASPEN CO 81612
DON LAMB, JR
LINDA GILKERSON
UNIV. OF CHICAGO
5640 ELLIS AVE
CHICAGO IL 60637
JOSEPH A MARCHETTI, TRUSTEE
1526 FOREST DR
GLENVIEW IL 60025
SHERRY WILLS AARONSON
6112 PINEHURST DR
EL PASO TX 19912-2024
PATTI WAKEFIELD
PO BOX 865049
PLANO TX 75086
ROBERT & RUTH JANE
600 E MAIN #206
,~
1""".
r--.
ASPEN CO 81611
HOLLAND & HART
600 E MAIN ST
ASPEN CO 81611
STEVE & DEBORAH BROUGH
599 TROUT LAKE DR
SANGER CA 93657
ROBERT & HOLDE BORCHERTS
1555 WASHTENAW
ANN ARBOR MI 48104
GILBERT & PATSY HICKS
3674 WOODLAWN TERRACE PLACE
HONOLULU HI 96822
LINDA LEE ROSS
426 HANDLEY BLVD
WINCHESTER VA 22601
ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER-SAINT MARY'S
ROTHGERBER ET AL
1200 17TH ST., 28TH FL
DENVER CO 80202
C.A. VIDAL
C/O REAL ESTATES AFF
11 7 S MONARCH ST
ASPEN CO 81611
HUNTER SQUARE PROPERTIES
IRVING BIERS
2900 LAS GALLINAS AVE
SAN RAFAEL CA 94903
pccgd:wp:2.14
)
~ ...---"
1 />:::;::.:- "__
".-::-. \,
.<;:':..-:'-:;.-'" ~..~
~y
/
/
'-"'--"'--
/
,
,/
/
-"
/'
i
\
,
/
(
~'\
'-, "\ I
-", "
,.,-#
/'"
--.'-
/
,/
-'
/ -------
/-'
/' -'1"/
.0",,,.'
;.,--" "-
---;'7
0--
'" .."
""
\
0'
"
"-0-..... '..,
" ,--- --
,-. \
\
--~. .........,
_ w_._'-::;;", "" .~......
,- - "',- '-.,
'-..... .~.... ."
-"
!
1
i,
I
,
0"'---
I \_
\,_./ \
'~-, I"
\
,
\
,/
\
~
/"
"
'"
j~-'-'"
-' ------.....................
--- C__... ,,_~
/ -----------" -",""
"',\ \"
" -"
//
\,
I
\\
II
,
\
\
--------------.~
. \'
"---:'''':::'~-:::--::='''';::.::.
\(r{r1( ,
\~\\,II
'1\\'1)
Iii'!
\11 \
}I\ ..'
'I! \
\" I'
~A \
~If
l
\1/'1'
W:(l
-,-
i
/
.'
,
(
/
')
r
/
/
<-..
.-
'\
---. ""',
/ ,;~;:-:: ;~:==':::-=:::f~~", ,
(i , I / /' j 0 i' I, \ \ \
i , I '1'1'
I I ! I
I I \ \ 'I' f \
I " i 1\
i \ \ \ \,
. \ j j,
\ ,
\. \ I
\. " \
' I i \
,! '- ,-:'.<
~.....~
'-.
'-
i
I, !
I! /"..
/r I
, ,/
-, I( / ./'"
,
"-- /
I
i
,
/
/
/
I
I.
',~
, I.
"
,
,
,
I
I
I
,
,,::--
,- -- r"/
// J
(- --. O' .-----::? '-. '.
"
,
\
0'",
-,
, ...... .--
-~ .. .
",
\
,
~
---,
"
.......,. '
.--..
I
I I
I~~<
~'/~' '\., v'
:--/ -...:,
/"
"
/'
J /
I
I
\
/
i
;
"
(~':'--" '
~r-
\
\
\
"-
\
J
\
,
(
\
"-
...,
2~--....'
~. ----.......
--. --.........."
/ ----~'~
'-""'" '\',\,
, \
\ '"
\
\1
I
,
,...-........-::::-......:>....-;:>
i(1df' '-'"
\~I\II
1\\'11
\1111
\\1 i \
jll -,'
II) 1\
101 ';
i:, ,
\I~JI; /
\\(0.
I
/
/ I
\ "
/ Ii
I il.-
\ \
'\ i
I . \
\ '
I) "; )
. '
,.
II I I
I() I
I'. ./
\./ /'"
'''-- ....."
o
--
,-
,
/
/
\
I
,/
,/''''
<..
..~-
'.
'"
,/ .....,..- --.. ..>.::~_.' --. ~'..
i /:/( (' ):I[]~~<I"I\ :
"I \ I I I
\ \ \ ,I r \
\ \ ) \1 ,I \ \ I \
1[, J
.I ! "- .~:":-'~~:" ~~~~~::..J~.., .../
^'
,,-,,
City of Aspen
Pre-Application Conference Sumrnary
/l1.lryt,e.J/l C/ ~i/f4
Pla'nner Date
Project ,1a-<-Y [;(:,c?I?"1<JIO/J
Applicant's Representative v R-<y7/e GI-udte?""
Representative's Phone PdO -S';; /I
Owner's Name f-; fkt',.-; {(;>VI1 tz!
Type of Application .
Description of the project/development being requested
CoudluJVM ...fv6cr'fvl.Jre",- cfJ~ JLK //4"o,?lCv-, c>~ SOZJ ' 700 ~ 10/
f21ft~;::yhDI)S ~~ r~ "''': ~'? ~ /, --t ~~ q"~
-" y , C'- NL ~ () 'P';' ; 1 c./. vfd t 'A-tA//7Ieuftt5.-,
.JOO/CR. ,ov/'/fC :?OIlP ell} "-';fd',
, v
The applicant has been requested to respond to tbe following items and provide the following
reports:
Land Use Code Section
Comments
~=1o~{8f~rb)
Ne.d i.; o"ldM..M I1'I'>W:.v,,.- of ~./zO'" It., rr:6<,ho'.-,
73 d/~n ffMo<<tJ (/td';!jiUI f1/Yt1.1'& O'!Y/NP
d-l:?provJ W 1>/0/70-1 (( "My€, '.
,. </. ,
The review is: (P&Z only) (CC only)<{i&Z and Cg->
Public Hearing: <Jye~ (rio) j do f Cc..
Deposit for the Application Review:~ ";;//1 ;J.ol.{O t
Re~el1}!I,~gel1cyf]at.f~~:, f .' ;"€iY
~rOTAEDEPOSrR', .,1$' .~Tffi'
(Additional hours are billed at a rate of 163/hr.)
~;t\LfO
Ot- --b ~ 4/~/7S-
Proof of ownership. 00 I 3:S~ '72...'? sz:, - <6' II Lf.Q .,'
Signed fee agreement. '~:~ ~ '-j;;f~
Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by tfle'iiPIJii6l.;lt
which also states the name, address and telephone number.of the representative.
Total deposit for review of the application $~ IS- .
'=> copies of the complete application packet and maps.
Summary letter explaining the request (existing conditions and proposed uses), including
street address and legal description of the property.
An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.
Site plan shall include property boundaries, lot size, proposed access, and physical
features (drainageways, streams, rivers, etc.)
tultiA.dIJ rLJ.:7tp .tJ",,~ hI-of' ~ov"P
Referral Agencies
I I
C}/ 1'1
'II,
~
To Apply Submit the Following Information:
~
~Cj
. 6
7 -~
,
@
10.
These items need to be subinitted if circled:
')
-Q
J;;
~
)I(.
List of adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the subject property with addresses.
Site photos.
Proof of legal access to the parcel,
Historic Preservation Commission review/approval.
::fad I
* II" 5'b-/6 {t'& 00"/ 'W&lhtJt/Je - JeAd Co!'/, To r~tR,