The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.sp.455 Doolittle Dr.A23-97 CASR>AD SUMMARY SHEET - CITY QP1-SPEN DATERECENED: 3/31/97 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID # 2737-062-00-858 CASE # A24-97 STAFF: ~~ ~ PROJECT NAME: Project Address: APPLICANT: AddresslPhone: OWNER: AddresslPhone: REPRESENT ATNE: David Hauter AddresslPhone: 130 S. Galena St 920-5085 Wate~lace Affordable Housing Insubstantial Amendment to a PUD.. ::; P Doolite Drive, Aspen U City of Aspen same RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Applicant Other Name/Address: FEES DUE PLANNING $0 ENGINEER $0 HOUSING $0 ENV HEALTH $0 CLERK $ TOTAL $ FEES RECEIVED PLANNING $ ENGINEER $ HOUSING $ ENV HEALTH $ CLERK $ TOTAL RCVD $ # APPS RECENED # PLATS RECENED GIS DISK RECENED: TYPE OF APPLICATION Staff Approval Review Body Meeting Date Public Hearing ., P&Z Yes No CC Yes No CC (2nd reading) Yes No o REFERRALS: o City Attorney o City Engineer (DRC) o Zoning o Housing o Environmental Health o Parks o Aspen Fire Marshal o City Water o City Electric o Clean Air Board o Open Space Board o Other: o CDOT o ACSD o Holy Cross Electric o Rocky Mtn Natural Gas o Aspen School District o Other: DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DATE DUE: APPROVAL: Ord. solution # taffApprov J"2."-fJ7 Plat Recorded: Date: Date: Book ,Page CLOSEDIFlLED ,DATE: ~/J!q7 ROUTE TO: ~...._ ... c..14VL INITIALS: ~ r-,. ,-., , i.J Housing Office City of Aspen/Pitkin County 530 East Main Street, Lower Level Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5050 Fax: (970) 920-5580 March 28, 1997 Mr. Steve Barwick Assistant City Manger 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Water Place Affordable Housing Project Dear Mr. Barwick, I have reviewed the Julie & Jeffrey Woods application for qualification to purchase a Water Place unit. Julie & Jeff are approved to purchase deed restricted housing for Category 4 through RO. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 920- 5050. Sincerely, . \ M/1;C0~vuJ ~tefJ:~A. Levesque Community Relations! Administrative Assistant >-- ~, ",;' .... Memorandum DATE: March 26,1997 TO: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director RE: Insubstantial Amendment to Approved PUD-- Waterplace Housing cc: Sara Thomas, Vicki Monge Attached is an application requesting an insubstantial Amendment to an approved PUD for the Waterplace Housing project located near the water plant. The applicant, represented by David Hauter, the City's Asset Manager, is requesting that each of the units ( 17 townhouses and 5 single family) be modified in order to allow basements to be placed under each of the units. When the project was reviewed, basements were not indicated on the plans. Because the units are fairly small, the city believes that a full basement for each unit is necessary to ensure adequate storage for employees. There is no change to the footprint of the buildings, and basements do not add to the FAR.. Under Section 26.84.080, "An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director." The code then goes on to describe those items that are NOT considered an insubstantial amendment. This proposal does not fall into any of those criteria, therefore it is eligible for an insubstantial amendment through you as the Director. Staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve this insubstantial amendment to the PUD, without conditions. If you agree with this recommendation, please sign here, and I'll forward a copy to the applicant as ~ll as the building dep an zoning administrator. p.,.??~O\J't.v (; \~~1 \\.lrl . . . _ _ \,)\r'c.v Irector of CommunIty Developme~~\.o~';,;.'" CO'J,'J,IJ\l.II{ ell{ o'i "S?'i.\l. ~. ATTACHMENT! ~ . LAND USE APPLICATION FORlh Project Name Waterplace Affordable Housing Project Location Doolittle Dr. near the water plant (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Present Zoning PUB SPA Lot Size 4.3 9 acres APPLICANT Address City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611-1975 Phone # 920-5085 REPRESENTATIVE Address David Hauter, Assets Manager 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611-1975 Phone # 920-5085 Type of Application (please check all that apply): 0 Conditional Use 0 Conceptual PUD 0 Conceptual Historic Devt. 0 Condominiumization 0 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) 0 Final Historic Development 0 Design Review Appeal 0 Conceptual SPA 0 Minor Historic Devt. 0 GMQS Allotment 0 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) 0 Historic Demolition 0 GMQS Exemption 0 Special Review 0 Historic Designation 0 Lot Line Adjustment 0 Subdivision 0 TextlMap Amendment 0 Lot Split 0 Temporary Use ~ Other: PUD Insubstantial Amendment 0 ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream 0 Small Lodge Conversion! Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Expansion Mountain View Plane Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate square feet; number of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the property): There are 17 townhouses and 5 single family units approved for this parcel under a PUD SPA application approved last year. At the time, the units did not indicate basements. Basements are being proposed for each unit to increase storage for the units, Description of Development Application: Applicant is requesting an insubstantial amendment to ensure that there will be no hold up at time of building permit when construction drawings are submitted for this project. Have you attached the following? . Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents-- Not Applicable . Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents--Not Applicable . Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application--Not Applicable r-, Water Place Housing Interested Employees: Police 7 Water 4 Electric 3 Recreation I Golf I Engineering I Total 17 Proposal for remaining 5 units: Parks Dept. I Data Processing I Community Safety I City-wide lottery 2 If any units remain: ,-., Allow Water, Electric, and/or Golf funds to purchase units for rental to their employees. or Increase the number of units in the City-wide lottery. J!' """"" ."-"'. s~ fZY[ I THE CITY OF ASPEN Asset Management Department N ,'de... REQUEST FOR DESIGNIBUlLD PROPOSAL Water Treatment Plant Storage Buildings Proiect PROJECT APPROACH The City of Aspen will select a qualified design/build team through a competitive process to work with the City Engineer and the City's Asset Manager in finalizing the design and construction of a new 3,600 s.f. storage building and a 400 s.f. addition to an existing metal storage building at the Water Treatment Plant. The purpose of this project is to provide the Water Treatment Plant with new enclosed storage buildings as describecl on the attached drawings A prebid conference will be held at the Aspen Water Treatment Site, at 1 :30 P.M., August 13, 1996. Attendance at the pre-bid conference is essential to convey the . City's intent regarding the plans and specifications. The City will at the time make available on hard copy and or diskette design development drawings, for $20.00 per set to the prospective bidders. (refundable if the complete set or sets are returned in acceptable condition). A single contract will be a negotiated with two parts. Part one authorizes the design-build team to complete the design and fix the price. Part two completes the design documents and the c011struction work. Standard City of Aspen contract forms will be used. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Deliver to the city one new storage building and one addition to an existing building. Using a metal buil~ing system provide all the architectural, engineering and construction services to construct the new storage buildings including, the foundation, floors, structural framing, walls, roof and all other elements such as doors, windows, insulation, accessories,. mechanical systems, electrical systems and all incidental work as required for a complete project. This includes all the associated sitework and infrastructure work to make this facility fully operational. It is the responsibility of the design team to complete the programming and obtain written approval from the City's Asset Manager of the final design prior to beginning construction documents. I The anticipated start date for construction is Ooiober I, 1996 with substantial completion by . J December 20, 1996. SELECTION. PROCESS Page 1 .~ ,r-, The City of Aspen invites the bidders to submit proposals to complete the design and build the project described by the attached drawings. The City shall evaluate each proposal to determine which three proposals represent the most'responsive proposals. The City's standard "Instruction To Bidders For Construction Projects" will be provide the basic guideline for selection of the three prospective bidders to be interviewed. Three (3) firms will be short listedand interviewed based on their response to this RFP. The critical dates are as follows: RFP available ---------------------------- August 6, 1996 Pre-Bid Conference ---------------~~---- August 13, 1996 Proposals Due ---------------------------- August 23, 1996 Interviews--------------------------------- August 28 1996 . , Design-Builder Selection --------------- August 30, 1996 Kick-Off Meeting ----------------------- Septernber 4, 1996 The Design-Builder will provide both design phase and construction services for the City, including: . A Construction Manager who will be responsible for all design, engineering and project management services, including project scheduling, construction, coordination, quality control and conducting weekly project review meetings. . Establish construction budget for the entire project, and provide ongoing budgetary monitoring. . Coordinate the design and construction process with the WTP operations. . Coordinate the design and construction process of this project with the "Infrastructure & Site Improvements Project" work being performed by others under a separate contract. . Provide all the architectural, civil, structural, mechanical and electrical services required to complete the project. . . Provide all the subcontractors, trades and other expertise to complete the work. . Provide the City with design analysis and value engineering. . Assist the City in developing the most energy responsible design solutions. . Obtain all the necessary permits and comply with all ordinances and code issues. . A critical path construction schedule. The design-build team selected shall demonstrate that it possess the right combination of skills and experience to perform the work of this contract efficiently, and promptly, without delay and within budget. A reputation for quality performance on previous contracts shall be especially important to the City in its sdection of a design-builder for this project. The fair market value for the fees for this project' is easily determined; other factod such as the to the ability to provide , a quality project, on time and within the budget are mvch more important considerations in the selection process, ' Page 2 ,-., ,-., . , MINIMUM OUALIFICATIONS In order to be considered for the work, the contractor must meet the following minimum criteria: . Completion of projects of similar scope and Size . . Satisfy the City's bonding requirements . Extensive experience in mountain construction . Demonstrated ability to complete the project within the specified schedule. PROPOSAL Include the following in your proposal: AlA Document A305, Contractor's Qualification Statement. Brief resume of principals and key team members. List of similar projects with contact persons and phone numbers for each. References including clients, subcontractors, financial institutions and bonding comparues. List of current projects Your detailed plan for the management for the project including: a. Your approach to construction, task management, and the designlbuild approach this project. b. List key personnel assignments and their roles on this project. c. Description of your estimating and cost control system d. Description of your subcontracting qualification, bidding and award process. e Description of your scheduling system including a sample f. Description of your quality control system. A Fixed Fee Proposal for all Architectural and Engineering Design Services. Also, provide a listing of the hourly rates for all key personnel. An Estimated Probable Construction Costs for the entire Project. Provide an itemized breakdown the construction costs listing overhead and profit as a separate line item. 9. A current financial statement. 10. A list of any claims against your bond in the past 5 years. 11. Any information that your team deems pertinent to the City in evaluation qualifications for. this project. 1. 2. , ~. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Provide six (6) copies of DesignlBuild Proposal are due not later than 2:00 p.m. on August 23, 1996 at the office ofthe City Clerk, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado. Clearly indicate on the envelope that this is a proposal for Design/Build Services for the Water Treatment Plant Storage Buildings Project. Questions are to be addressed in writing to David Hauter, Asset ~ . '. Manager, FAX (970) 920-5119.- The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any informalities and teclmicalities, and to base it decision solely on its interpretation of what best suits the needs of the project and the City. Page 3 v / ! / / / / ! , / / / , ! I .~-j I I , I I I , I I , I , I I I / I ! ! I I I r I I ! / / / I / I .I i '. / , , , , , , I ! / / I / i / ,/ i / / /. , .. ,. i ./ l I , I / I / I ,/ / ! / 1 / I ! { ('\1 j\ ~ / I I 12 I \,/ ; - I \ ;" ill i 1:/< ,:~, ! :1 \ .. i~ i )' II' \ .lql ! " \~: :;! ] , ~:,i II ~l :t;~f ~ A A:'.~"i' /; /.! ~~'I . , ~~ ~ / ~~'.: ~'1; ~,! J <::.~~, 1\ ;z.~ .: I J II i I .!-,- m". I , \ ' I II : II \ '"r J I \ I \1 / \ \. / : \ I I I I i \, \ \' \ \ I f ., I ! \ \ " \ \ , ' I I I I , i \ : , , 1\ V \ /\. \ i ( ----' l( ~ ...r (\ ..2 . ~ 8 I" <s I " , I / , I " I I ! I ! "1 ! :r~ I ~n~ I <( q: ! / ~ I I I ! , I , I , , ! ! I L<f> '" <::> \iit\bill ViQ ~~~ (t~~ I Vi I i i i , ! ; / .I 10 ;" 01 ~ ! ; ; I ~/ \ I , , , ///~. / i i ! r I , \ \ , , \ \\ ., , , ^\ / ,,\. / ,\ / '\-" / . / \ X \, \ -.Y,% \ " \""J:...z~ / \ '=''0%<5> / I I I \ I \ \ , :\ / \ \ \ \. \ \ :Ii' \, \ ., , \ \ \ (-~ . ' , " ~ I I "~I "I ] j b I ~ I I I I I I I , ! i , , ! ,n G , , " 8--- oj ti \> 2 . . " - ~ ----{\ ~ ,;:J:r 0111.. ~~ \:!:i 1/111. ~~ ~0-_l I) 2 , %--- 0-'-- - - 8 ~ _~~'';''':~''';.M;'' z . - --,- {- Q C It": ~ ~,~ v :Ui! <v ~~ . z 9 o. ~~ ( ...I;h~'" I.: ~ fum ~~ .< ,. ~ ~m ,..:ll H . " ~~ ~ , ill }- ~ " <' g~ ~~ ~~ v. J ," ~:o vO ~8 v" ~~ c z w I cill ri}- << ~m w Dz eW -~ ~Q ~Q .uJ ~ -~ ~ " o . ti , . ~ z " ~~ ,oj oz J ; .1 ~. , ' , . . .. .. , )\ ..- ~~ f- --4 J ~ ~I } zl .~ } J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l' f ..;::s ~"1J ~ " " B , . ~ . . 8 B , . ~ . J . " " " . ti , . ~ . z <( ..J Il. I'- Z UJ 2: I'- <( UJ Ii I'- Ii UJ I'- <( ~ ~ UJ Z \J,...,: \../3, ~ rO 9~ S9 -' ----- ~~ " 1 I I 61 ~I ! " ., " L < " ~ .~ iil. ~ffi '. 5~ ~lli ~; i 8r ..~ .-. o ~ ~ L 3j[ ~~ .0-,;;1 ~~w iil~. .g~ ~~- 3iil~ ~ f ~ / ~ ~" / ~~ i ~/ / / ( / ~~ ~w .~ ~i ~>D ....iri 1 Illf jlllllW ,111m 111=;:/1 I- I r Illj 1==1 ill "g II- I/ 111 I / / \\) z Cl _J ::) ill ill \\) <( It () I- ISI 1-- Z <( -1 lL I- Z ill L z I- ()~ I- It \) I- iii () ISI It ~ ill __"I \\) I- OJ Z <( "- Cl~ ill ....J ~ ~ ::) ill \) ill.z . If) .--. (~,. ~J )\ 1 v ~ . . .':!: . .- t , , ~ < <; ~ ~l ~ " t- , , 1 " / i / ;' rj{l , , 'll/ // f / I I I ! / ( ! i .I / I ! i , / I I ! ! i I l' ! ./ ------ ~ ---., ~ , ; OJ _..f ~ ;" /' ~ ".-- i Ii / \ \,'\.. ~, \ \ \ u - ..~ \.j CJ ;::L I ;' -' I / I ; / j / I ../' "; .' \ / I ;' ! ./ o~/.(; r---- . . . ---... . . . --...r"-.'-..___., __. ._.____...,'- . ,.. ...---...." " "- / / ~...~...""'l '; ."!\~'" . r :.. ,I I f Jr- -...>=- I C> _ ".~_ /" - ...~--,...,..--- ~""'~"~-J ------,--~~.-- I .... ~'" ~'" {:l~ 8}0:) ;. . ~ .>:> bj ~ ~ 0: . ~.., ..- ~" .--"_.... . .... -. .... "'-j . . - ..~"..... ' .. . . .. ce._._....._...::: ,-,.~-~. .=.,..-:.'~i";~~~:"--~ . . . ................ ~a. . ~-.-~I. ~.. _ -7.=:-:'rO\.=~~"-'~.,.~.-- ...c..... . '-','''' . . .. .. ........-.' : ,_.. ...' ':.. "... - ..," .".' ,~:.-..:..;:,. - - ..,' _""'~: ;" "'" ..c. ...' .._~.- 7;':"'-" ':";:"";;--- ;.,._=. .n i' - " -.,;.--... " " .::- .- ":.... - ,'-;-_n ~ ~ ~. " "' ~~ ~t:. I;. t:J , "' ~~ ~~ a:~ ;0-'"'' ~. ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~{'\ I , i i , I t ! 1 , i ~. <.j . It ~ 1\ ~ ~\ ~ I..a: . '111 " 't': .1 I It: ~~. , : ~ ~t '"\-- ~.,I .., 1 ~ 1 ., " > " \ ., I :: <1" I II .\ ]I ,\ J I ..<1 ,,'\f11 __-1.i'l ---~~---~I .! L~ \ ., \ \ \ \ , '" ~ .~ <5 ~ I::: ~ ~ -., :.- i 1 i I ..1 I i I ! ~.... \ . ' I 12.' ~:::~V"'!"I~~I~""~~'D:~~:;!~,:,<.'.",;.;~.':~;;;;~~e~7''''",?~,.<:'~':\'!"!'ir="'''P~\('!''':''''o.~''''~''':$::Z:~W&2:~~~~.;r#"~-"r..;';T.'.n''~~';7.~$\fo.""<:.~_'~~~~' .~v.;y,-~~-"""'"'~- -~.,,"t:......=-,w ,-., ,-., Water Plant Housing Application areas needing further information (not in particular order): grading information for two proposed roadway alignments, including cross-sections, percent grades, etc. - location of trash/recycling pedestrian easement down to park area - new dedication of sewer line easement? specific variation information 'for housing unit net livable areas - information regarding chlorine storage site and implications - information on soils study: any more, info on time of submission? - planning fee waiver request or request of waiver of tap fees, park impact fees, etc? - intent to participate in pro-rata costs for Castle Creek Rd.? . _._---=.. .GMQ,..<L_""""rnpt- ; on. n p.w...re.gulation.<;;....f.ar "f f or.dabl.e...l1o.using...proje.c.:l:.s_1__ review criteria and unit availability numbers - review criteria for SPA (Sec. 7-804 B) - review criteria for Subdivision (Sec. 7-~004 C ~-5) - review criteria for Conditional Use (Sec. 7-304, specifically A and B) 1"""'\ .""""', MEMORANDUM To: Selection Committee Members (Steve Banvick,litlip;.a~~~Ob;Phil Overeynder, Cris Caruso) Cris Caruso, City Engineer t(/' From: cc: Amy Margerum, City Manager Date: November 7, 1994 RE: Doolittle Drive Housing Project - Proposals for Planning & Architectural Services Attached are copies of proposals which were submitted Friday, 1114194, for the above referenced project. A pre-proposal meeting was held on 10125194, to discuss proposals for planning and architectural services for the Doolittle Drive Housing Project. The meeting was attended by me, Doug Graybeal, Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects Ltd., Joode Schooberlein, Harry Teague Architects, and Scott Smith, Gibson & Reno Architects. Attendance was mandatory for Proposers, therefore firms which did not attend the meeting will not be considered for planning or architectural services for this project. The City of Aspen intends to procure services from a single firm for the duration of the project. This creates some difficulties as the project program will be developed in the Planning Phase, one phase for which the Proposers are submitting. The attendees agreed to set parameters for proposal submission in attempt to eliminate assumptions and provide a better avenue to evaluate the proposals. . Program parameters were developed for proposal purposes ouly and do not represent an approved project program. Proposals are expected to include fee adjustments for a changing program. Proposals were submitted for an assumed 12 Units with 3 Bedrooms and 2 Bathrooms. Each Unit is assumed to be 1600 square feet in area and one plan type may be used throughout the project. Civil, Site, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, and other design disciplines are assumed to be included for the successful design of the project per the Request for Proposals Packet. The following is a summary of proposed total compensations fof services by each fInn: Cottle Graybeal Yaw $143,000 Gibson-Reno $163,000 Harry Teague $269,935 Please review the proposals and grade each firm using the attached Evaluation Form. As you will see, the firms involved are all very qualified. As I confirmed, we will meet Thursday, 11110194, in my office to review the results and determine if and when to conduct interviews. I suggest that we try to select a firm and submit a recommendation to Council by ,Wednesday, 11123194. Thanks! ...-,.,.. c '--'J ,-.,., ~ Doolittle Drive Housing Project Request for Proposals for Planning & Architectural Services ADDENDUM #1 A pre-proposal meeting was held at 10:00 am, October 25, 1994, to discuss proposals for planning and architectural services for the Doolittle Drive Housing Project. The meeting was attended by Cris Caruso, City of Aspen Engineer, Doug Grabeal, Cottle Grabeal Yaw Architects Ltd., Joede Schoeberlein, Harry Teague Architects, and Scott Smith, Gibson & Reno Architects. Attendance was mandatory for Proposers, therefore firms which did not attend the meeting will not be considered for planning or architectural services for this project. Proposals are due Friday, November 4, 1994, at 10:00 am. At the proposers' request, this due date was extended from the previously allocated due date. The City of Aspen intends to procure services from a single firm for the duration of the project. This creates some difficulties as the project program will be developed in the Planning Phase, one phase for which the Proposers are submitting. The attendees agreed to set parameters for proposal submission in attempt to eliminate assumptions and provide a better avenue to evaluate the proposals. Program parameters were developed for proposal purposes only and do not represent an approved project program. Proposals are expected to include fee adjustments for a changing program. Proposals shall be submitted for an assumed 12 Units with 3 Bedrooms and 2 Bathrooms. Each Unit is assumed to be 1600 square feet in area and one plan type may be used throughout the project. Civil, Site, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical, and other design disciplines shall be included for the successful design of the project per the Request for Proposals Packet. cc: Amy Margerum, City Manager John Worcester, City Attorney enclosures: area plat area topographic map dldrpro.adl . ,~.:.:~_._,;~,:,:,:'L~tk~,;\~:'~:., /: ./,.' . .~ .,...,." DOOLITTLE DRIVE HOUSING PROJECT Request for Proposals for Planning and Architectural Services The City of Aspen is soliciting proposals from qua1ified architects for planning and design services in association with the Doolittle Drive Housing Project. The project is proposed to include construction of six to twelve housing units at the City of Aspen Water Plant Facilities property. A pre-proposal meeting will be held 10:00 am, Tuesday, October 25, 1994, in the Engineering Department of Aspen City Hall, 130 South Galena Street. Attendance is mandatory unless prior authorization is given by the City Engineer. Sealed proposals clearly marked "Proposal for Doolittle Drive Housing" will be received at the Engineering Department, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611, until 2:00 pm, Tuesday, November 1, 1994. Proposal Packets are available from the Engineering Department. In addition to the general requirements outlined in the Instructions to Offerers, please submit a demonstration of capabilities to perform similar planning and design services and resumes of individuals to be assigned to the project. The City of Aspen reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals, accept what is, in its judgement, the Proposal which is in the City's. best interest, and reserves the right to waive any technical defects or irregularities in any or all Proposals submitted. Discussion may be conducted with offerors who submit Proposals determined to be reasonably susceptible of being selected for award. BY THE ORDER OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO ~..,L--? a Cristopher Caruso City Engineer .......bid ~'''-..., ~ J". mE .CITY OF ASPEN INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I. The City of Aspen has advertised to invite Professionals to submit sealed Proposals as more fully described in the Request for Proposals. The following instructions have been prepared to assist Offerors in the preparation of their Proposals. These instructions may be altered -by the City whenever it is deemed necessary in the best interests of the City. 2. The Contract Documents for this project shall consist of the following documents: A. Request for Proposals (public Notice and Letters to Potential Offerors). B. Instructions to Offerors. C. Addenda, if any. D. Proposal submitted by Offeror. E. Proposal Bond Forms, if any. F. Qualification Form, if any. G. Notice of Award. H. Agreement. I. Scope of Work, if not set forth in the Request for Proposals. J. Notice to Proceed. 3. Information contained in the Contract Documents, as completed during the contract award process, shall be the basis for the Proposals, and nothing shall be deemed to change or supplement this basis except for written revisions to the above documents issued by the City of Aspen. 4. The City of Aspen reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals or accept what is, in its judgment, the best Proposal. The City further reserves the right, in the best interests of the City, to waive any technical defects or irregularities in any and all Proposals submitted, and to negotiate contract terms with the Successful Offeror, and the right to disregard all nonconforming, nonresponsive or conditional Proposals. Discrepancies between words and figures will be resolved in favor of words. Discrepancies between the indicated sum of any column of figures and the correct sum thereof will be resolved in favor of the correct sum. . 5. The cost of proposal preparation shall be borne solely by the persons or entities submitting proposals. 6. The following procedures or steps shall be followed after the issuance or i>ublication of Request for Proposals: . ~~~ ',: ., r-, t""\ A. Reference is made to the Request for Proposals to determine if a pre- Proposal conference will be scheduled, and if so, where and when. If a pre-Proposal conference is scheduled, attendance at the pre-Proposal conference is mandatory unless prior authorization is given by the City. The costs of attendance at a pre-Proposal conference shall be borne entirely by the Offeror. B. Reference is made to the Request for Proposals to determine how complete Proposal PackageS may be obtained. C. Before submitting a Proposal, each Offeror must (a) examine the Contract Documents thoroughly, (b) visit the site, if any, to familiarize her/himself with local conditions that may in any manner affect cost, progress or performance of the Work, (c) familiarize her/himself with federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations that may in any manner affect costs, progress or performance of the Work; (d) familiarize her/himself with the unique weather conditions of the City of Aspen and surrounding area that may affect costs, progress or performance of Work; and (e) study and carefully correlate Offeror's observations with the Contract Documents. D. Reference is made to the Request for Proposals for the identification of those reports of investigations and tests of subsurface and latent physical conditions at the site or otherwise affecting cost, progress or performance of the Work which have been relied upon by the the City of Aspen_or a consultant in preparing any Drawings or Specifications. These reports are not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness, nor are they part of the Contract Documents. Before submitting her/his Proposal each Offeror will, at hl'(r/his own expense, make such additional investigations and tests as the Offeror may deem necessary to determine her/his Proposal for performance of the Work in accordance with the time, price and other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. E. Reference is made to the Request for Proposals to determine the place, date, and time for delivering sealed Proposals for this project. F. Proposals shall be submitted at the time and place indicated in the Request for Proposals and shall be included in an opaque sealed envelope, marked witli the Project title and name and address of the Offeror and accompanied by the Proposal Security referenced below and other required documents, If the Proposal is sent through the mail.or other delivery system the sealed envelope shall be enclosed in a jseperate envelope with the notation "PROPOSAL ENCLOSED" on the face thereof. Proposals submitted by facsimile machine (FAX) shall not be accepted or 2 ~ //-....... ~ considered. G. Reference is made to the Request for Proposals to determine if Proposal Security shall be required for this project. If a Proposal Security is required then each proposal must be accompanied by Proposal Security made payable to the City of Aspen, in an amount of five percent (5%) of the maximum Proposal price and in the form of a certified or bank check or a Proposal Bond (on form attached, if a form is prescribed) issued by a Surety. The Proposal Security of the Successful Offeror will be retained u!ltil such Offeror has executed the Agreement and furnished the required Payment and Performance Bonds, if any are required by the Supplemental General Conditions, whereupon it will be returned; if the Successful Offeror fails to execute and deliver the Agreement and furnish the require Performance and Payment Bonds, if any are required, within fifteen (15) days of the Notice of Award, the City of Aspen may annul the Notice of Award and the Proposal Security of that Offeror shall be forfeited. The Proposal Security of any Offeror whom the City of Aspen believes to have a chance . of receiving the award may be retained by the City of Aspen until the earlier of the seventh day after the "effective date of the Agreement" (which term is defined in the General Conditions) or the sixty first (61) day after the Proposal opening. Proposal Security of other Offerors will be returned within seven (7) days of the Proposal opening. H. Reference is made to the Request for Proposals for any Proposal Forms that may be required to be completed as part of the Proposal. Proposal Forms, if any. are required, must be completed in ink or by a printerltypewriter. The Proposal price must be stated in words and numerals; in case of a conflict, words will take precedence. Proposals by corporations must be executed in the corporate name by the president or a vice-president (or other corporate officer accompanied by evidence of authority to sign) and the corporate seal must be affixed and attested by the secretary or an assistant secretary. The corporate address and state of incorporation .shall be shown below the signature. Proposals by partnerships must be executed in the partnership named and signed by a partner, whose title must appear under the signature and the official address of the partnership must be shown below the signature. I. Proposals may be modified or withdrawn by an appropriate document duly executed (in the manner that a Proposal' must be executed) and delivered to the place where Proposals are td be submitted at any time prior to the opening of Proposals. If, within twenty four (24) hours after Proposals are opened, any Offeror files a duly signed written notice with the City of 3 '~.".I r -. ,-., Aspen and promptly thereafter. demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the City of Aspen that there was a material and substantial mistake in the preparation of her/his Proposal, that the Offeror may withdraw her/his Proposal and the Proposal Security will be returned. Thereafter that Offeror shall be disqualified from further Proposalding on the Work. J. At the place, date and time fixed for opening Proposals, all Proposals received prior to that time shall be opened and . reviewed. All Proposals shall remain open for a period of thirty (30) days, but the City may, in its sole discretion, release any Proposal and return the Proposal .Security prior to. that date. K. The City shall then evaluate each Proposal in the best interests of the City of Aspen. The proposals shall be evaluated to determine which are the most advantageous to the City of Aspen taking into consideration price, the evaluation factors set forth at Section 3-l4(f) of the Aspen Municipal Code, and any factors set forth in the Request for Proposals. .L. Prior to accepting a Proposal, the City may decide to interview one or more Offerors to negotiate final contract terms for incl usion in the Agreement. M. To demonstrate qualifications to perform the Work, each Offeror must be prepared to submit within five (5) days of a request, financial data, previous experience or evidence of authority to conduct business in the state of Colorado N. Upon determining the successful Offeror, the City of Aspen shall send to the Successful Offeror a Notice of Award notifying the recipient of the City's acceptance of the Offeror's Proposal, subject to the City Manager or City Council approval of the Contract Documents. The Notice of Award shall also forward to the presumptive Successful Offeror three (3) unexecuted copies of the Agreement with instructions to execute and return the same to the City within ten (10) days or risk having their Proposal declared abandoned. If the proposed Agreement shall be for an amount in excess of $25,000.00, the City Council at its next regularly scheduled meeting following receipt by the City of the duly executed copies of the Agreement shall be asked to consider approval of the Agreement and authorize the Mayor of the City of Aspen to execute the same. If the proposed. Agreement shall be in an amount equal to or less than $25,000.00 the City Manager shall be asked to consider appro;val of the Agreement by executing the same. J O. Upon receipt of all documents required by the Notice of Award and upon 4 r~ ~ approval of the Agreement by the City Council or City Manager, the Successful Offeror shall be sent a Notice to Proceed along with a copy of the Agreement duly executed by the City Manager or Mayor of the City of Aspen. . 7. All purchases of supplies, construction or building materials. shall not include Federal Excise Taxes or Colorado State or local sales or use taxes. The City of Aspen's State of Colorado tax identification number is 98-04557. The City of Aspen's Federal Tax Identification Number is 84-6000563. 8. There are specific indemnity and insurance requirements which the Successful Offeror must comply with prior to the start of Work for this project. These requirements are set forth in detail in the Agreement. 9. The submission of a Proposal will constitute an incontrovertible representation by the Offeror that he has complied with every requirement of these instructions and that the Contract Documents are sufficient in scope and detail to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance of the Work. 10. Reference is made to the Request for Proposals for the identity of the City of Aspen's project manager(s) who will coordinate all aspects of the selection process. All questions about the meaning or intent of the Contract Documents shall be submitted to the project manager(s) in writing. Replies will be issued by Addenda mailed or delivered to all parties recorded by the project manager(s) as having received a Proposal Package. Questions received less than ten (10) days prior to the date of Proposal openings may not be answered. Only questions answered by formal written Addenda will be binding. Oral and other interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect. in.~~t3 .bed . version 4/92 5 .J.. v , "-..,, ...-, QUALIFICATION FORM The undersigned certifies to the truth and accuracy of all statements made and questions answered. , 1. How many years have you been in business? If a corporation: When incorporated In what state President Vice president Secretary Treasurer If a partnership: Date of organization Type of partnership Names and addresses of all partners 2. Attach a list of major projects your organization has under contract as of this date. Give name of project, owner, and engineer, including addresses and phone numbers, contract date, percent complete, contract amount, and scheduled completion date. 3. Attach a list of major projects, similar to this project, your organization has completed within the past five years. Give name of project, owner, and engineer, including addresses and phone numbers, date awarded, date completed, and contract amount. 4. Have you ever failed to complete any work awarded to you? If so, where and why? ~, ,- 5. Bank references: 6. Trade references (materials suppliers. subcontractors): 7. . Maximum bonding capacity: $ 8. Attach a list of key personnel in your organization. 1UU-uPe. ~f04e.~ _e~__JIt~"~...-y ~f)IJNe-t.- -""--.- Dated at This day of . 19 Name of organization By Title .~ .,-", FEE PROPOSAL The Proposal may be submitted on standard AlA or other appropriate forms and must include the following breakdowns of cost and time along with employee billing rate schedules for the Architect and it's consultants. The Architect shall bill the city on an hourly basis not to exceed total fees for each phase as listed below. Progress payments are billable on a monthly basis. PLANNING PHASE $ Estimated Time: SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE $ Estimated Time: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE $ Estimated Time: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE $ Estimated Time: BIDDING AND NEGOTIATION PHASE $ Estimated Time: CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE $ Estimated Time: TOTAL FEE $ .~ Af;RFFMFNT FOR PROFFSSTONAT SFRVTrFS This Agreement made and entered on the date hereinafter stated, between the CITY OF ASPEN, Colorado, ("City") and , Colorado ("Professional"). For and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: I. SC.llp_ of Work Professional shall perform in a competent and professional manner the Scope of Work as set forth in Exhibit "A" and Standard Tenns and Conditions for Professional Architectural Services Contracts attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. rompl_rion Professional shall commence work immediately upon receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the City and complete all phases of the Scope of Work as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work in a timely manner. The parties anticipate that all work pursuant to this agreement shall be completed no later than . Upon request of the City, Professional shall submit, for the City's approval, a schedule for the performance of Professional's services which shall be adjusted as required as the project proceeds, and which shall include allowances for periods of time required by the City's project engineer for review and approval of submissions and for approvals of authoritites having jurisdiction over the project. 'This schedule, when approved by the City, shall not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Professional. 3. P.ym_nt. In consideration of the work performed, City shall pay Professional a total amount not to exceed $_, in the event that all Phases are performed as requested by the City. Professional shall submit, in timely fashion, invoices for work performed. The City shall review such invoices and, if they are considered incorrect or Wltimely, the City shall review the matter with Professional within ten days from receipt of the Professional's billing, the City understanding of the disposition of the issue. Professional's invoice shall be for the period ending the 25th day of each month. The invoice should be received by the City's project director no later than the 1st of each month. The City shall have the option of asking the Professional to perform any number of phases of the project. Payment shall be based upon Exhibit "B", Fee Proposal, for phases perfonned. The City will notify the Professional of phases it wishes to have performed via formal written Notices to Proceed. Fees including any additional services or reimbursable expenses shall not exceed the following amoWlts for each given phase: Planning Phase $ Schematic Design Phase $ Design Development Phase $ Construction Document Phase $ Bidding and Negotiation Phase $ Construction Phase $ 4. Nnn_A~~ig:rmhiliqr. Both parties recognize that this contract is one for personal services and cannot be transferred, assigned, or sublet by either party without prior written consent of the other. Sub-Contracting, if authorized, shall not relieve the Professional of any of the responsibilities or obligations WIder this agreement. Professional shall be and remain solely responsible to the City for the acts, errors, omissions or neglect of any subcontractors officers, agents and employees, each of whom shall, for this purpose be deemed to be an agent or employee of the Professional to the extent of the subcontract. The City shall not be obligasted to payor be liable for payment of any sums due which may be due to any sub-contractor. 5. Tmn;n.rion The Professional or the City may tenninate this Agreement, without specifying the reason therefor, by giving notice, in writing, addressed to the other party, specifying the effective date of the termination. No fees shall be earned after the effective date of the tennination. Upon any termination, all finished or unfInished documents, data, sllldies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports or other material prepared by the Professional shall become the property of the City. Notwithstanding the above, Professional shall not be relieved of any liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by the Professional, and the City .may withhold any payments to the Professional for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amoWlt of damages due the City from the Professional may be determined. .J, '3~ /-, ~ 6. rnvpmmtAg::!oinl!:/;t rnntin~nt Fppl!:/;. The Professional warrants that slh.ehlis not been employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee wqrking for the Professiqnal, to solicit or secure this contract, that s!he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, connnission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or malting of this contract. For a breach or violation of this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. 7. Tno'pmoen' rnntrnctnT StoOl' It is expressly acknowledged and understood by the parties that nothing contained in this agreement shall result in, or be construed as establishing an employment relationship. Professional shall be, and shall perform as, an independent Contractor who agrees to use his or her best efforts to provide the said services on behalf of the City. No agent, employee, or servant of Professional shall be, or shall be deemed to be, the employee, agent or servant of the City. City is interested only in the results obtained under this contract. The manner and means of cOnducting the work are under the sole control of Professional. None of the benefits provided by City to its employees including, but not limited to, workers' compensation insurance and unemployment insurance, are available from City to the employees, agents or servants of Professional. Professional shall be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Professional's agents, employees, servants and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. Professional shall indemnify City against all liability and loss in connection with, and shall assume full responsibility for payment of all federal, state and local taxes or contributions imposed or required under unemployment insurance, social security and income tax law, with respect to Professional andlor Professional's employees engaged in the performance of the services agreed to herein. 8. Tnoemnifir~rinn Professional agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, insurers, and self-insurance pool, from and against all liability, claims, and demands, on account of injury, loss, or damage, including without limitation claims arising from bodily injury, personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage, or any other loss of any kind whatsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with this contract, if such injury, loss, or damage is caused in whole or in part by, or is claimed to be caused in whole or in part by, the act, omission, error, professional error, mistake, negligence, or other fault of the Professional, any subcontractor of the Professional, or any officer, employee, representative, or agent of the Professional or of any subcontractor of the Professional, or which arises out of any workmen's compensation claim of any employee of the Professional or of any employee of any subcontractor of the Professional. The Professional agrees to investigate, handle, respond [0, and to provide defense for and defend against, any such liability, claims or demands at the sole expense of the Professional, or at the option of the City, agrees to pay the City or reimburse the City for the defense costs incurred by the City in connection with, any such liability, claims, or demands. The Professional also agrees to bear all other costs and expenses related thereto, including court costs and attorney fees, whether or not any such liability, claims, or demands alleged are groundless, false, or fraudulent. If it is determined by the fina1 judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction that such injury, loss, or damage was caused in whole or in part by the act, omission, or other fault of the City, its officers, or its employees, the City shall reimburse the Professional for the portion of the judgment auributable to such act, omission, or other fault of the City, its officers, or employees. 9. Prnfpl!:/;l!:/;lnn::!ol'l!:/; Tmmrnnre. (a) Professional agrees to procure and maintain. at its own expense, a policy or policies of insurance sufficient to insure against all liability, claims, demands, and other obligations assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. Such insurance shall be in addition to any other insurance requirements imposed by this contract or by law. The Professional shall not be relieved of any liability, claims, demands, or other obligations assumed pursuant to Section 6 above by reason of its failure to procure or maintain insurance, or by reason of its failure to procure or maintain insurance in sufficient amounts, duration, or types. (b) Professional shall procure and maintain, and shall cause any subcontractor of the Professional to procure and maintain, the minimum insurance coverages listed below. Such coverages shall be procured and maintained with fonus and insurance acceptable to the City. All coverages shall be continuously maintained to cover all liability , claims, demands, and other obligations assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. In the case of any claims-made policy, the necessary retroactive dates and extended reporting periods shall be procured to maintain such continuous coverage. (i) Workmen's Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by applicable laws for any employee engaged in the performance of work under this contract, and Employers' Liability insurance with minimum 2 . ''''';';~;{~'X:'' ~', ,~ limilS of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOILARS ($500,000,00) for each accident, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOILARS ($500,000.00) disease - policy limit, and FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000.00) disease- each employee, Evidence of qualified self-insured status may be substimted for the Worlanen's Compensation requirements of this paragraph. (ii) Commercial General Liability insurance with minimum combined single limits of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) aggregate. The policy shaIl be applicable to all premises and operations. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form property damage (mcluding completed operations), persoual injury (including coverage for contractual and employee acts), blanket contractual, independent contractors, products, and completed operations. The policy shall contain a severability of interests provision. (iii) Comprehensive AutomolJi/e Liability insurance with mininnm1 combined single limits for bodily injury and property damage of not less thah ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) aggregate with respect to each Professioual's owned, hired and non-owned vehicles assigned to or used in performance of the Scope of Work. The policy shall contain a severability of interests provision. If the Professional has no owned automobiles, the requirements of this Section shall be met by each employee of the Professioual providing services to the City under this contract, (iv) ProfessionalLiabilily insurance with the minimum limits of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000) each claim and FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000) aggregate. (c) The policy or policies required above shall be endorsed to include the City and the City's officers and employees as additional insureds, Every policy required above shall be primary insurance, and any insurance carried by the City, its officers or employees, or carried by or provided through any insurance pool of the City, shall be excess and not contributory insurance to that provided by Professioual. No additional insured endorsement to the policy required above shall contain any exclusion for bodily injury or property damage arising from completed operations. The Profes- sioual shall be solely responsible for any deductible losses under any policy requited above. (d) The certificate of insurance provided by the City shall be completed by the Professional's insurance agent as evidence that policies providing the requited coverages, conditions, and minimum limits are in full force and effect, and shaI1 be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of the contract. No other form of certificate shall be used. The certificate shall identify this contract and shall provide that the coverages afforded under the policies shall . not be cancelled, terminated or materially changed until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City. (e) Failure on the part of the Professioual to procure or maintain policies providing the required coverages, conditions, and mininnm1limits shall constimte a material breach of cOntract upon which City may Immediately terminate this contract, or at its discretion City may procure or renew any such policy or any extended reporting period thereto and may pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, and all monies so paid by City shall be repaid by Professional to City upon demand, or City may offset the cost of the premiwns against monies due to Professional from City. (f) City reserves the right to request and receive a certified copy of any policy and any endorsement thereto. (g) The parties hereto understand and agree that City is relying on, and does not waive or intend to waive by any provision of this contract, the monetary limitations (presently $150,000.00 per person and $600.000 per occurrence) or any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, Section 24-10-101 er seq., C.R,S" as from time to time amended, or otherwise available to City, its officers, or its employees, 10. rlty'~ Tn"'l1r~n("p.. The parties hereto understand that the City is a member of the Colorado Intergovern- mental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) and as such participates in the CIRSA Property/Casualty Pool. Copies of the CIRSA policies and manual are kept at the City of Aspen Finance Department and are available to Professional for inspection during normal business hours. City makes no representations whatsoever with respect to specific coverages offered by CIRSA- City shall provide Professional reasonable notice of any changes in its membership or participation in CIRSA. 3 ,-, ,-, 11. ('nmpl~ten~.. nf Agreement. It is expressly agreed that this agreement contains the entire undertaking of the parties relevant to the subject matter thereof and there are no verbal or written representations, agreements, warranties or promises pertaining to the project mailer thereof not expressly incorporated in this writing. 12. Natk:e. Any written notices as calJed for herein may be hand delivered to the respective persons and/or addresses listed below or mailed by certified mail return receipt requested, to: City: Amy Margerum, City Manager City of Aspen 130 South Galena'Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Professional: 13. Nnn_ni~~rimin~rinn' pp.n::llty. No discrimination because of race, color, creed, sex, marital stanIs, affectional or sexual orientation, family responsibility, national origin, ancestry, handicap, or religion shall be made in the employment of persons to perform services under this contract. Professional agrees to meet all of the requirements of City's municipal code, Section 13-98, pertaining to non-<liscrimination in employment. 14. WaiJa:J:. The waiver by the City of any term, covenant, or condition hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term. No tenn, covenant, or condition of this Agreement can be waived except by the written consent of the City, and forebearance or indulgence by the City in any regard whatsoever sball not constilUle a waiver of any term, covenant, or condition to he performed by Professional to which the same may apply and, until complete performance by Professional of said term, covenant or condition, the City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to it under this Agreement or by law despite any such forbearance or indulgence. 15. hyp.r.nt1nn of A grl"':f":mp:nt hy ("ity. lbis agreem~nt shall be binding upon all parties hereto ~ their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this agreement shall not be binding upon the City unless duly executed by the Mayor of the City of Aspen (or a duly authorized official in his absence) following a Motion or Resolution of the Council of the City of Aspen authorizing the Mayor (or a duly authorized official in his absence) to execute the same. 16. rypnp.r~l TprTn(:. (a) It is agreed that neither this agreement nor any of its terms, prOVIsIons, conditions, representations or covenants can be modified, changed, terminated or amended, waived, superceded or extended except by appropriate wrillen instrument fully executed by the parties. (b) If any of the provisions of this agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable it shall not affect or impair the validity, legality or enforceability of any other provision. (c) The parties acknowledge and understand that there are no conditions or limitations to this understanding except those as contained herein at the time of the execution hereof and that after execution no alteration, change or modification shall be made except upon a writing signed by the parties. (d) This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado as from time to time in effect. 4 /~~<z-:.~,' ~".c:...'..c:::-.:::,~_, ~, .~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, !be parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Agreement in three copies each of which shall be deemed an origina! on !be date hereinafter written. Dated: ATIESTED BY: WITNESSED BY: REVIEWED BY: Cristopher Caruso, City Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: John P. Worcester, City Attorney agrprof2.bid-Version:4193 CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: By: Amy Margerum, City Manager PROFESSIONAL: By: 5 '-, ..-., 11ffi CITY OF ASPEN STANDARD TERMS AND CONDIT.IONS FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACTS These standard terms and conditions have been prepared by the City of Aspen to be incorporated by reference into Agreements entered into between the City of Aspen and architects or professional architectural firms for professional architectural services. The provisions herein are interrelated with other standard contract documents customarily used by the City of Aspen and a change in one may necessitate a change in others. Whenever a conflict exists in the terms and conditions of this doctnnent and the Agreement, the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement shall take precedence. ARTICLE 1 ARCHITECT'S SERVICES AND RESPONSIBll..ITlES 1.1. GENERAL 1.1.1. The Architect shall perfonn the services undertaken according to the Agreement with the City. The part of the project for which Architect is to provide services pursuant to the Agreement with the City is hereinafter called This Part of the Project 1.1.2. The Architect shall designate, when necessary, a representative. authorized to act in the Architect's behalf with respect to This Part of the Project 1. 1.3. The Architect's services sha11 be perfurmed in character, sequence and timing so that they will be coordinated with those of the City and all other consultants for the Project 1.1.4 The Architect sha11 reconnnend to the City the obtaining of such investigations, surveys, tests, analyses and reports as may be necessary for the proper execution of the Architect's services. 1.1.5 The Architect shall provide progress copies of drawings, reports, specifications and other necessary infonnation to the City and other consultants. All aspects of the Work designed by the Architect shall be coordinated by the Architect, and the Architect shall also become familiar with the Work designed by the City and other consultants as necessary for the proper coordination of the Project. 1.1.6 The Architect shall cooperate with the City in determining the proper share of the construction budget to be allocated to This Part of the Project. 1.2 BASIC SERVICES The Scope of Work document shall set fortjJ. the Basic Services which the Architect has agreed to perform. The Scope of Work may consist of one or more of the following phases. The terms and conditions set forth below apply to those phases which have been made a part of the Scope of Services. PLANNING PHASE PROGRAMMING 1.2.1 Needs Assessment Conduct interviews with staff to evaluate physical housing needs. Develop preliminary space programs. ~. ,~ Present preliminary program options for staff recommendations, ModifY programs per staff recommendations, L22 Land Use Issues Meet with city agencies to evaluate land use regulations as they pertain to this project SITE PLANNING L23 Site Visits Visit site with staff as necessary to investigate existing conditions. L2.4 Site Plan Develop conceptual site plan options. Meet with staff to evaluate site plan options and receive input Draft site plan options with recommendations for options, F onnalize Space Programs PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS 125 Present conceptual designs to Aspen City Council, Planning & Zoning Commission, and Blue Ribbon Committee, IncOlporate input into conceptual designs. MASTER PLAN 12.6 Develop a Master Plan including the following elements: a, Area Map b, Conceptual Site Plans c, Conceptual Building and Landscaping Elevations d, Statement of Current and Projected Uses e, Needs Analysis I Space Programs f Discussion of Architectural Options g, Conceptual Cost Estimates h, Swnmary of Public Input Issues, Land Use Issues, and Responses to Issues SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE L2.7. The Architect shall ascertain the requirements fur This Part of the Project and shall confirm such requirements with the City, . L2.8 The Architect shall review alternative systems with the City, attend necessary conferences, prepare necessary analyses, drawings and other documents, be available for general consultation, and make recommendations regarding basic systems for This Part of the Project When necessary, the Architect shall consult with public agencies and other organizations concerning utility services and requirements, L2,9 The Architect shall prepare and submit to the City a Statement of Probable Construction Cost of This Part of the Project based on current area, volunie or other unit costs, as directed by the City, DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 12, I 0 When authorized by the City, the Architect shall prepare from the Schematic Design Studies approved by the City the Design Development Documents, . These shall consist of drawings and other documents to fix and describe This Part of the Project, including material,!, equipment, component systems and types of construction as may be appropriate, all of which are to be approved by the City, 12,.11 The Architect shall submit to the City a further Statement of Probable Construction Cost of This Part of the Project 2 ,'-" .-" CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 1.2.12 When authorized by the City, the Architect shall prepare from the Design Development Documents drawings and specifications setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of This Part of the Project, all of which are to be approved by the City. The Architect shall prepare the Drawings and Specifications in such format as the City may reasonably requrre. 1.2.1 3 The Architect shall advise the City of any adjustments to previous Statements of Probable Construction Cost of This Part of the Project indicated by changes in requirements or general marl<et conditions. 1.2.14 The Architect shall assist the City as necessary in connection with the responsibility for filing the documents concerning This Part of the Projectrequired for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. BIDDING OR NEGOTIATION PHASE 1.2.15 If required by the City, the Architect shall assist the City's project engineer in obtaining and evaluating bids or negotiated proposals, and in awarding and preparing contracts for construction. . CONSTRUCTION PHASE - ADMINISTRATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 1.2.16 The Construction Phase will commence with the award of the Contract for Construction and together with the Architect's obligation to provide Basic Services under this Agreement, will terminate when final payment to the Contractor is due or, in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment or of such due date, sixty days after the date of Substantial Completion of the Work, whichever occurs first. 1.2.17 Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement and incorporated in the Contract Documents, the Architect shall assist the City in the Administration of the Contract for Construction with respect to This Part of the Project, as set forth below and m General Conditions of the Contract for Construction. 1.2.18 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction for This Part of the Project or as otherwise agreed with the City in writing, to become familiar with the progress and quality of the Work for This Part of the Project and to determine if such Work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. The Architect shall keep the City informed of the progress and quality of the Work for This Part of the Project and shall goard the City against defects and deficiencies in such Work of the Contractor. 1.2.19 The Architect shall at all times have access to the Work for This Part of the Project wherever it is in preparation or progress. 1.2.20 The Architect, based on observations at the site and on evaluations of the Contractor's Applications for Payment, shall assist the City in determining the amounts owing to the Contractor for This Part of the Project and shall certify such amounts to the City. Such certification shall be in writing if requested. 1.2.21 Certification by the Archi\ect to the City of an amount owing to the Contractor shall constitute a representation by the Architect to the City that, based on the Architect's observations at the site as provided in Subparagraph 1.2.12 and the data comprising the Contractor's Application for Payment, the Work for This Part of the Project has progressed to the point indiCated; that in the Architect's professional opinion, the quality of such Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such Work for confonnance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests required by or performed unper the Contract Documents, to minor deviations from the Contract Documents correctable prior to completion, and to any specific qualifications stated by the Architect); and that the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount certified. 1.2.22 Upon written request of the City, the Architect shall furnish to the City, with reasonable promptness, written interpretations of the Contract DoCuments prepared by the Architect, if, in the opinion of the City, such interpretations are necessary for the proper execution or progress of the Work. 1.2.23 The Architect shall render written recommendations, within a reasonable time, on all claims, disputes and other 3 ~ ~^ matters in question between the City and the Contractor relating to the execution or progress of This Part of the Project or the interpretation of the Contract Docwnents. 1.2.24 The Archile9t shall assist the City in determining whether the City shall reject Work for This Part of the Project which does not conform to the Contract Docwnents or whether special inspection or testing is required. 1.2.25 The Architect shall review and approve, or take other appropriate action upon, and fOIWard to the City for final disposition the Contractor's submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples with respect to This Part of the Project; but only for conformance with the design concept of the Work and with the information given in the Contract Docwnents. Such action shall be taken with reasonable promptness so as to cause no delay. The Architect's approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component 1.2.26 The Architect shall assist the City in preparing Change Orders for This Part of the Project for the City's approval and. execution in accordance with the Contract Documents. The Architect shall recommend to the City minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time which are not inconsistent with the intent of the Contract Docwnents. 1.2.27 The Architect shall assist the City in conducting inspections, with respect to This Part of the Project, to determine the dates of Substantial Completion and finaI completion, and shall review and approve, or take other appropriate action on, the Contractor's list of items to be completed or corrected and shall fOIWard the list to the City for final disposition. The Architect shalI assist the City in receiving llIld fOIWarding for review written warranties and related docwnents required by the Contract Documents and assembled by the Contractor with respect to This Part of the Project. The Architect shall issue to the City a final certificate in writing with respect to final payment for This Part of the Project 1.2.28 If at any time during This Part of the Project the Architect determines that it is necessary to provide more extensive representation atthe site for the Architect to fulfill the Architect's responsibilities at the site as described hereinabove, the Architect shall provide one or more Project Representatives, as necessary, to assist the Architect. Such Project Representatives shall be selected, employed and directed by the Architect. 1.3 ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following Services are not included in Basic Services unless specifically included in the Scope of Work They shall, . however, be provided if requested in writing by the City, and they shall be paid for by the City as provided in the Agreement, in addition to the compensation for Basic Services. 1.3.1 Providing financial feasibility or other special studies. 1.3.2 Providing planning surveys, site evaluations, environmental studies or comparative studies of prospective sites, and preparing special surveys, studies and submissions required for approvals of governmental authorities or others having jurisdiction over the Project. 1.3.3 Providing services relative to future facilities, systems and equipment which are not intended to be constructed during the construction Phase. 1.3.4 Providing services to investigate existing conditions or facilities, or to make measured drawings thereof, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information related thereto. 1.3.5 Preparing documents for alternate, separate or sequential bids, or providing extra services in connection with bidding, negotiation or construction prior to the completion of the Construction Documents Phase, when requested by the City. J . 1.3.6 Providing coordination of work performed by separate contractors or by the City's own forces. 1.3.7 Providing services in connection with the work of a construction manager or separate consultants retained by the City. 4 ,-,. ,-, 1.3.8 Providing Detailed Estimates of Coostroction Cost, analyses of owning and operating costs, or detailed quantity surveys or inventories of material, equipment and labor. 1.3.9 Providing engineering services or special consultants related to interior design services and other similar services required for, or in connection with, the selection, procurement or installation of furniture, furnishings and related equipment 1.3.10 Providing services for planning tenant or rental spaces. 1.3.11 Making revisions in Drawings, Specifications or other documents when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given, are required by the enactment or revision of codes, laws or regulations subsequent to the preparation of such documents, or are due to other causes not solely within the control of the Architect 1.3.12 Preparing Drawings, Specifications and supporting data, and providing other services in connection with Change . Orders to the extent that the adjustment in the Basic Compensation resulting from the adjusted Construction Cost is not commensurate with the services required of the Architect, provided such Change Orders are required by causes not solely within the control of the Architect 1.3.13 Making investigations, surveys, valuations, inventories or detailed appraisals of existing facilities, and providing services required in connection with coostroction performed by the City. 1.3.14 Providing consultation concerning replacement of any Work damaged by fire or other cause during construction, and furnishing services as may be required in connection with the replacement of such Work. 1.3 .15 Providingservices made necessaxy by the default of the Contractor, or by major defects Or deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor, or by failure of performance of either the City or the Contractor under the Contract for Coostroction. 1.3.16 Preparing a set of reproducible record drawings showing significant changes in the Work made during coostroction, based on marked-up prints, drawings and other data furnished by the Contractor to the City. 1.3.17 Providing extensive assistance in the utilization of any equipment or system, such as initial start-up or testing, adjusting and balancing, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operation and maintenance, and consultation during operation. 1.3.18 Providing services after issuance to the City of the final Certificate for Payment, or in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment, more than sixty days after the Date of Substantial Completion of the Work. 1.3.19 Preparing to serve or serving '!S an expert witness in connection with any public hearing, arbitration proceeding or legal proceeding. 1.3.20 Providing services of consultants for other than the normal engineering services for This Part of the Project 1.3 .21 Providing any other services not otherwise included in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice. ARTICLE 2 THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The City shall, with reasonable promptness, provide all available information regarding the requirements for This Part of the Project. 2.2 The City shall designate, when necessary, a representative authorized to act in the City's behalf with respect to This Part of the Project. The City, or such authorized representative, shan examine documents submitted by the Architect and shall render decisions pertaining thereto promptly, to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of the Architect's services. 2.8 lfthe City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect with respect to This Part of the Project, or 5 ~, nonconformance with the Contract Documents, prompt written notice thereof shall be given by the City to the Architect. 2.9 The City shall consult with the Architect before issuing interpretations or clarifications of the Architect's Drawings and Specifications and shall request the recommendation of the Architect before acting upon Shop Drawings, Product Data, Samples or other submissions of the Contractor, or upon Change Orders affecting This Part of the Project. 2.11 The City shall advise the Architect of the identity of other consu1tants participating in the Project and the scope of their services. 2.12. The City shall review the Architect's work for compliance with the City's program and for overall coordination with the City's and other engineering requirements. ARTICLE 3 CONSTRUCTION COST 3.1 The Cons1ruction Cost of the Project shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the City of all elements of the Project designed or specified by the City or the City's consultants. The Construction Cost of This Part of the Project shall be the total cost or estimated cost to the City of all elements of the Project design.ed or specified by the Architect. 3.2 The Cons1ruction Cost of the Project or of This Part of the Project shall include at current market rates, including a reasonable allowance for overhead and profit, the cost oflabor and materials furnished by the City and any equipment which has been designed, specified, selected or specially provided for by the City and, the City's consultants. 3.3 Construction Cost does not include the compensation of the City's consultants, the cost of the land, rights-of-way, or other costs which are the responsibility of the City as provided in Article 2. 3.4 Evaluations of the City's Project budget, Statements of Probable Construction Cost and Detailed Estimates of Cons1ruction Cost, if any, prepared by the Architect, repIesent the Architect's best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry. 3.5 If a fixed limit of Construction Cost has been established, the City and the Architect shall establish, if practicable, a fixed limit of Construction Cost for This Part of the Project. If such a fixed limit is established, the Architect, after consultation with the City, shall be pennitted to include contingencies for design, bidding and price escalation, to determine what materials, equipment, component systems and types of construction are to be included in the Contract Documents with respect to This Part of the Project, and to make reasonable adjustments in the scope of This Part of the Project to bring it within the fixed limit. If required, the Architect shall assist the City in including in the Contract Documents alternate bids to adjust the Construction Cost to the fixed limit. Any such fixed limit shall be increased in the amount of any increase in the Contract Sum related to This Part of the Project occurring after execution of the Contract for Construction. 3.5.1 If the Bidding or Negotiation Phase for This Part of the Project has not commenced within three months after the City receives the Construction Documents any Project budget or fixed limit of Construction Cost for This Part of the Project established as a condition of this Agreement shall be adjusted to reflect any change in the general level of prices in the cons1ruction industry between the date of sub. mission of the Construction Documents to the City and the date on which bids or proposals are sought. 3.5.2 If a Project budget or fixed limit of Construction Cost for This Part of the Project (adjusted as provided in Subparagraph 3.5.1) is exceeded by the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal, the City may require the Architect without additional charge, to modify the Architect's Drawings and Specifications for This Part of the Project as necessary to bring the Construction Cost thereof within such fixed limit for This Part of the Project. If it was not practicable to establish a fixed limit of Construction Cost for This Part of the Project, and if the lowest bona fide bid or negotiated proposal, the Detailed Estimate of Construction Cost or the Statement of Probable Construction Cost established for the entire Project (including the bidding contingency) exceeds the fixed limit of Construction Cost of the entire Project, the City may require that the Drawings and Specifications prepared by the Architect be modified without additional compensation as necessary to make them bear a reasonable portion of the burden of reducing the Construction Cost of This Part of the Project so that the fixed limit of Construction Cost for the entire Project is not exceeded. The providing of such service shall be the limit .6 , . "-\ .~ of the Architect's responsibility in this regard, and having done so the Architect shan be entitled to compensation for all services performed in accordance with this Agreement. ARTICLE 4 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE 4.1 Direct Personnel Expense is defined as the direct salaries of all the Architect's personnel engaged on the Project, and the portion of the cost of their mandalcry and customary contributions and benefits related therelc, such as employment taxes and other statutory employee benefits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacations, pensions, and similar contributions and benefits. ARTICLE 5 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 5.1 Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic and Additional Services and include aCtual expenditures made by the Architect and the Architect's employees and consultants in the interest of the Project (to the extent they are reimbursable by the City for the expenses listed in the following Subparagraphs; provided that Architect shall not be reimbursed for expenses unless prior written approval therefore has been obtained from City. 5.1.1 Expense of transportation in connection with the Project; living expenses in connection with out-of-town travel; long distance communications; and fees paid for securing approvals.of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. 5.1.2 Expense of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings, Specifications and other documents, excluding reproductions for the office use of the Architect, the City and the City's consultants. 5.1.3 Expense of data processing and photographic production techniques when used in connection with Additional Services. 5.IA If authorized in advance by the City, expense of overtime work requiring higher 'than regular rates. 5.1.5 Expense of renderings, models and mock-ups requested by the City. ARTICLE 6 PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT 6.1 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF SERVICES 6.1.1 Payments for Basic Services, Additional Services and Reimbursable Expenses shall be made on the basis set forth in the Agreement. 6.1.2 The City shan disclose to the Architect, prior to the execution of this Agreement, any contingent or other special provisions relative to compensation. 6.1.3 The Architect shall submit, in timely fashion, invoices for Basic Services, Additional Services and Reimbursable Expenses. The City shall review such invoices and, if they are considered incorrect or untimely, the City shall review the matter with the Architect and confirm" in writing to the Architect within ten days from receipt of the Architect's billing, the City's understanding of the disp'l,sition of the issue. 6.IA If and to the extent that the Contract Time initially established in the Contract for Construction is exceeded or extended through no fault of the Architect, compensation for any Basic Services required for such extended period of Administration of the Construction Contract shall be computed as set forth in the Agreement. 7 ~~:.c...,-,--_".:..~~~___.. /"", /~ ARTICLE 7 ARCHITECT'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS 7.1 Records of Reimbursable Expenses and expenses pertaining to Additional Services and services performed on the basis of a Multiple of Direct Personnel Expense aball be kept on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles and shall be available to the City or the City's authorized representative at mutually convenient times. ARTICLE 8 . OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS 8.1 Except for reference and coordination purposes in connection with future additions or alterations to the Work. Drawings and Specifications prepared by the Architect in instruments of service are and shall be the property of the City whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. The Architect shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of Drawings and Specifications for such information and reference. The Drawings and Specifications may be used by the City on other projects, or for completion of this Project by others. 8.2 The Architect sha1l maintain on file, and make available to the City, design calculations for This Part of the Project, and shall furnish copies thereof to the City on request. 8.3 Submission or distribution to meet official regulatory requirements, or for other purposes in connection with the Project, is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the City's or the Architect's rights. -'" 8 r-, ".-.\ MESSAGE DISPLAY TO cris Caruso CC Stan Clauson From: Amy Margerum Postmark: 11 Jan,95 9:07 Status: Previously read Subject: Reply to: Doolittle Drive Housing Reply text: From Amy Margerum: I would like to go to Council to ask for this extra money. preceding message: From Cris Caruso: The design team is requesting $6,125 additional to go to the 4-step process. I'll stop by. -------========x========------- ~ ./""'\. .,,-., MEMORANDUM TO: Cris Caruso, City Engineer Stan Clauson, City C.D. Direct~ FROM: DATE: 23 January 1995 RE: Doolittle Drive Housing Developrnent This memo is to confirm that staff will review the application for the Doolittle Drive Housing Development as a two-step process. In making this determination, the department is relying on the representation of project consultants that extra community meetings will be held to ensure consensus at the critical junctures in the formal review process, It also appears that familiarity with the project on a city staff and Council level will support an efficient two-step process. Attached is a memo from staff detailing issues with respect to a two-step process. It would be helpful to share these concerns with our consultants, Kim Johnson will be responsible for liaison with the consultants to develop the land use application and will be ready to schedule the application as soon as it is prepared. Please let me know how I can help further. Attachment cc: Amy Margerum, City Manager Kim Johnson, Planner ",- s r.. ~ MEMORANDUM FROM: stan Clauson Kim JOhnSO~ January 12 :V995 TO: DATE: RE: Water Plant Review Process I understand cris Caruso's desire to process the project as a two step versus four step review. As we have discussed, the scope of the project is fairly extensive with its industrial and residential components. The fee deposits associated with either process are related to the anticipated amount of staff time needed to complete the review. If we decide to undertake this as a two step review, it is very likely that Planning staff will be involved in additional meetings (informal and formal public hearings) , research and memos not accounted for within the two step fee deposit for 12 hours of staff time. My concern is that P&Z and Council (and concerned neighbors) will need more than one public meeting each to understand the project well enough to grant their approvals. Since the application fee deposit is subject to additional hourly billings as it accumulates, it is important that the applicant understand that ultimately the cost of review might ultimately be the same whether two step or four step is pursued. Another consideration is that a two step review requires the application to be submitted at a "Final" level of detail, requiring much up front work from the architects and planning consultants. If the P&Z and Council have objections to basic concepts (density or layout), a certain amount of work would have to be replicated by the design team. ,"""'" ,-" Memorandum To: Kim Johnson, Community Development Department From: Cris Caruso, City Engineer Date: 4/12/95 RE: Water Place Housing: Chlorine Impacts The attached documents, which you have seen, were provided by the Water Department as general information related to emergency response. It is evident that these documents do not provide all-encompassing information for the Water Department's policies and procedures with regards to chlorine. I contacted Mark O'Meara, Chief Water Plant Operator, this afternoon to gain further information on this matter. He noted that it has taken some time to develop an emergency response plan, and that the plan is not yet complete. The Water Department has been working closely with Colorado Chlorine Consultants, Inc. to gain information. Mark will ask for their input on the additional proposed housing, but believes that the final plan will maintain consistent emergency response procedures for Castle Ridge, Twin Ridge, and Water Place, as each housing development lies within 1500 feet and beyond 500.feet of the chlorine building. " Ainong the policies and procedures being developed are measures for educating area residents on emergency response and evacuation procedures. Once the Water Department has fully developed the response plan, the residents of Castle Ridge, Twin Ridge, Water Place, and any others within 1500 feet of the chlorine building will be asked to attend periodic workshops to become educated on procedures in the event of an emergency. They will also receive emergency event instructions and updates to be posted in each home. This is the latest information that I have. Again, I am informed that the Water Department is working diligently to develop an emergency response plan related to chlorine, and that the Water Place Housing Project is being considered with their plan. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank You CJl^1 cc memo: City Manager Water Department Community Development chlrespl.wpJ /"""'. ,~ ~ ~i~~L- ...-;- r;. d~~~_~---~-- LV _ /YI-~",-_ .. ~. "7"t'~1'~E':... 16 ;t.~, b-DQ: cl o~ffij,~ -. \J1/ _' ~ u~\tr-L..,Q/) ~C' i"v?b.__ ~ vv .~..J '0 ' 1 ,!\JL;V\.AA \ . I ) R. . _ 3,~~.~ ti~.e-.~=ljl~~-~~~ LfkD JA.1. h ~.l ~l lAJLt-~~~o -- .. ~/\~_.A-~ ~ .A.,., JvL-J_(.CL~~ ~..Q.^j\ I" .) .-~ +. c L ~~---1:~A~~, 04~. ~t~---i _&""'MJ ~':j.. ~'1:'~~ ~- ~~-.- - T ~------ ----- S ~~~'-~- =:rG-. . r - ~_J__~~ . .... ri~ ~{tWl .~ . --.n~C V - - =: . __ ~ i _~.___~_______________ :----.----~r~~Vl-~-~~~(', k J ----------- --r"-- ~ ~ ~-- fB-JV~ \A.A~~--.---------.. -----I"""'- 75471 . Ca.nary 75431 Gmentint PRlf\:TED IN US/I .' r-, ,""+-a-v\ C l41A~ _ f=-"( \ ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Phil Overeynder cc: Amy Margerun1 Bill Earley Steve Barwick Nick Adeh Scott Smith \ \ ,\ ^ David Haut~ \ FROM: RE: 1996 Affordable Housing & Water Plant Improvements Project DATE: February 13, 1996 ? At the project review meeting for the Affordable Housing & Water Plant Improvements Project held last Monday (2/5/96) and in follow-up meetings last week with Nick Adeh, City Engineer, you brought forth several issues. Some of the issues could cause major design changes and have a major impact to the schedule. As the project leader responsible for delivery of the project, I acknowledge the concerns and offer the following suggestions in order to move the Project forward. Please initial where we have agreement or provide specific suggestions for action: 1. Existing Water Line- The single family units are too close to the existing transmission water line and Doolittle Drive, and if the water line is relocated it would free-up the site. The existing raw water line on the western perimeter of the site hems in the single family homes. We propose to move this raw water line to the Doolittle ROWand from Doolittle ROW extend to the West under a cul de sac connecting into the existing raw water line on down the line. The design and construction documents for this new line could be included into the project, but the actual construction costs would need to be funded from the Water DepartnJent AMP. The single family homes would be placed behind a landscaped berm, separating the homes from the traffic on Doolittle Drive. The opportunity to move the homes away from the street will make it safer for children and add additional area between residences. The overall effect will be a less crowded and much safer neighborhood. Page I .I' ,-". ,-" The number of home sites will determined by the balancing of topographic, solar access and density considerations. No home site created will require a retaining wall greater than three feet above the finished floor or so unique that extra ordinary costs would be incurred during construction. (please see attached sketch) 2. Backwash Sediment Drying Bed - The Water Plant operations include the removal of sludge from the back wash pond. I was informed last week that the area currently being used for discharge is the western perimeter of the site above ground adjacent to the raw water line. The handling of this discharge at the existing location may be in conflict with the intention of the housing design program; to provide private views and yards to the outside extending into the natural vegetation for all the residences. However, Nick has mentioned that there may be a creative way to deal with this and incorporate the discharge it into the proposed water feature. The prospect of integrating the water feature to divert this discharge is very intriguing, and I look forward to learning more about this possibility from you and Nick. The idea of the water feature accomplishing this function along with picking up surface water and providing irrigation is certainly fulfilling an objectives of the green design approach, that is to have design solutions solve more than one problem. ~ 3. Transformer Storage- There appear to be several acceptable options for the storage of the electrical transformers. The accessibility, protection and site work requirements need to be clarified. The final location dependent on other site plarming issues may be determined later. The options for transformer storage need to be identified that will allow for the plarming process to continue. (Recommendation from the City Engineer is requested) 4. Brick Storage - There are several acceptable options for the storage of the mall bricks. The accessibility, protection of the bricks and site work requirements need to be clarified. The final location is dependent on other site planning issues and may be determined later. The options for a site should be identified which will allow for the plarming process to continue. (Recommendation from the City Engineer is requested) Page 2 ~. ,-" ,-., 5. Spoiled Material Storage- The proposed Water Plant site plan includes an open area for the storage of spoiled parts and miscellaneous material. The specific needs for Water Department and the Electrical Department are not quantified. The square foot area needed, accessibility, protection and other site work requirements need to be clarified. (Recommendation from the City Engineer is requested) 6. Office Space - The demolition of the existing building at the proposed housing site will require the water meter operations to relocate. If you do not intend to include any space for personnel in the new storage buildings, then the relocation will require an internal reorganization under existing roofs, or maybe the use of a temporary trailer until new office space is built. It is my understanding that you would like to continue along the lines of the master plan we discussed last fall, i.e., the construction of new office space above the west plant building. This is not in current scope of work, and could turn a long term goal into a short term objective. ~ I feel that the specific space planning needs for water plant operation are not sufficiently communicated or quantified. It is my understanding that you feel that there may be a need for the equivalent of nine (9) new offices. I recommend that you and your staff prepare and overall layout and master plan of your operations that includes the proposed new storage buildings, the housing project and an eventual reservoir expansion. This is a task that should be done over a longer time than is available under the current scenario for construction of the "1996 Affordable Housing & Water Plant Improvements Project". I recommend that Housing Project construction be phased to allow for the planning of new office space and a relocation of the water meter shop and offices. The addition of new second floor office space and the relocation of the Water Meter Group could be the Phase Two development of a sequenced construction plan that is part of the master plan. 7. New Storage Buildings- The proposed location of the new storage buildings as shown on the current drawings was determined after many hours of comparative site studies and several meetings with you and your staff. The location and site analysis were completed with the reservoir expansion in mind and other site-related requirements and limitations. The proposed location works well with all the site constraints including topography, Page 3 ./" ."-.,, "-.,, accessibility and traffic circulation. This site plan once had your approval. (please see attached drawing) The next step was going to be to review with you the building plans and prepare the final construction drawings this Spring. The coordinated construction of these buildings along with the road improvements could happen early summer. :/ Revisiting the site selection phase will disrupt the project flow and impact the construction schedule. I recommend that you approve the proposed site plan. However, prior to approving this plan you and Nick need to review it to make sure it meets your needs. An expedient review and approval would keep us on track. ~ 8. Reservoir Expansion - As mentioned above the proposed location and design of the new storage buildings takes into account the proposed reservoir expansion. It is my understanding that a detailed site analysis has not been completed regarding the proposed reservoir expansion, and the information available is relatively sketchy. The potential for a larger reservoir is a fact that was strategic to the placement of the buildings in their current proposed location. The level of information needed to establish the precise requirements for the reservoir expansion are beyond the current level of understanding and need to be part of the master plan. Please advise if there is other critical information that we need to know prior to finalizing the construction plans for Water Plant improvements. 9. Sequence of Construction Operation- It is understood that the uninterrupted operations ofthe Water Plant are essential to the community, Any proposed project effecting day to day operations of the plant must be planned and coordinated. It is my intent to work hard to insure that the construction and administration of this project minimizes disruption as much as possible to the normal operations, This will be a basic requirement of bidding and negotiations with the Contractor(s). This project will undoubtedly involve several prime contracts that will need coordination. To have a successful project and a well- executed project we first need accurate information 'and time to produce clear, complete construction documents. The importbce of timely information and timely review and approvals in order, to produce the best construction documentation cannot be overstated. Page 4 .; '-"', ,'-'" The Bid Documents will require the contractor to produce a detailed sequence of all construction operations. The construction schedule and sequencing shall be prepared in advance, and will require your review and approval. Furthermore, the selection of the Contractor(s) will be based on lowest qualified bidder not just cost. " In conclusion, this is a project that links the community need for housing to the Water Plant. There is probably no other site owned by the City that offers a perfect infill site; semi-rural with sewer, water, transportation and an opportunity for our work force to live, work and play within the city. It is also a project that will not be possible until integrated into the operations of the Water Plant and the surrounding neighborhood, I will be out of the office until next Wednesday morning. In the meantime the Design Team has been instructed to hold off on the design process and the P&Z application has been placed on hold. I would like to meet with you next Thursday or at soon thereafter to review progress on the above. I will be checking for messages and returning calls; please call me if you have a question. I believe that by all of us working together we will be able to quickly reach resolution of all of the above issues. Page 5 I;XIST. RESEVOIR I I I I I I j I ,-., PROPOSED (18) UNITS 1" I"lA TER PLACE HOUSIN0 ~. LOCATED NORTH OF V'lATER TREA THENT PLANT C.ONNEC TED '.. 1"""\ ( TI"lO-I"lAY MAIN ACESS/E0RESS ROAD. RE0RADE TO 890 MAX. AND RESURFACE. /, ! PROPOSED SEMI-TRUCK - TURN-A-ROUND -- '--. -------- o ~ '" /; i (;J Ji tJ u _.. 'f ......-:1 ! ; 5eD/~ ~ -~~~,:J / / ~"1 .~._~~~ / <::.-.,-- FUTURE -.--- I Or-,K FR ROOMS I I I ! "OTES. I. A 50' DIAM. C.LEARANC~ SHto.LL BE MAINTAINED AROUND THE CHLORINE BUILDIN0 2 TV'lENTY (20) ON-SITE Pf'RKIf"G SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED. ' 3 TH~ MAIN TI"lO-V'lAY ROi'Dl"li'Y SHALL BE DESIGNBD TO ACCOMODATE A SEMI-TRUC-K TURNIN0 RADIUS. . I I . PRO/POSED' ~ASTER /PLAN AND PROPOSED ROAD IMFROVEMENTS C9 c NOR.TH c:.; TY OF ASPEN - l^lA TER TREA THENT PLANT SCAL-E: I" = 100'-0" prepared blj: d!h c.itlj of aspen sept. 8, 1'1'15 r-\ .~ MESSAGE DISPLAY TO TO TO City Dept Heads Water Dept Electric Dept TO TO Patrol Streets Dept From: Steve Barwick Postmark: Jul 08,96 4:16 PM Status: Previously read Subject: Water Place Housing ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Message: We would like to have a meeting with all emergency response personnel and department heads who may be interested in a Water Place Housing unit. At the mtg we will: introduce the project (#, size, and prices of the units), cover Housing Authority category requirements, construction schedule, deed restriction terms, the lottery procedures, and mortgage rates, terms, qualifications, etc. This is the "real deal" now, so please attend if you are even remotely interested. Meeting is at 5:30, Tue, July 16 in the Sheriff's conf room. Please call me at x5296 if you have any questions. -------========x========------- .~ ~ MESSAGE DISPLAY TO CC CC Steve Barwick Nick Adeh Amy Margerum CC CC Dave Michaelson Stan Clauson From: DAVID HAUTER Postmark: 17 Jul,96 10:04 Status: Previously read Subject: Maroon Creek Caucus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Message: The WTP Improvements and Affordable Housing submission adresses the traffic impacts to Castle Creek road and the intersection at Hiway 82. However, the methdology to determine the pro-rata share for road and intersection improvements is open for discussion....this is going to be King Woodwards issue at the next CC mtg. on 7/22. We need to review the city's response...one important consideration: This is a not for profit development that is promoting the use of public transportation...please advise...maybe we should meet to discuss this issue...thanks -------========x========------- r-, -.. " , eu, SrM &'AUSG.1 MEMORANDUM To: David Hauter Thru: Nick Ade~ From: 'Chuck Roth (l.~ Date: November 8, 1996 Re: Final Plat - City of Aspen Water Treatment Plant and Affordable Housing Project I. Attached is a copy of the portions of the Municipal Code which have been used as a check list in reviewing the final plat The circled items are hickihg. 2. The fmal plat, generally speaking, is comprised of all the drawing sheets that were submitted during the review process. They include boundary, architectural, engineering (utilities, roads, drainage) and landscaping drawings. Corrections to the submission drawings may be necessary as a result of conditions of approvals resulting from the review process or due to plat omissions which only need to be corrected prior to recording the final plat. The best example of a recent and complex SPA plat is the Aspen Meadows which contained 47 sheets. 3. The title should reflect .the name used in the approving ordinance, which was Ordinance No. 23 (Series of 1996). Therefor the title should be "City of Aspen Water Treatment Plant and Affordable Honsing Project SPA and Subdivision Final Plat" 4. Add a general note referencing previous plats as follows: - City Water Plant spA at Book 9, Page 68 ,': ,',:..,'.,.., . . , '-'.'il.'..' .,' - City Thomas Properly Subdivision Exce. ption at Book 14, Page 41 , . ,.' \ \. ,'. - City Thomas Properly Subdivision Exception, Lot 4, Specially Planned Area Map at Book 15, Page 93 - City Thomas Properly Subdivision Exception, Lot 4, Specially Planned Area Map, Amendment No. I at Book 16, Page 6 . ~rnu 1 1 "(rO.... .. ,.1 k,vO 1 r-, ..-., 5. The title certificate should read as follows: "I, John Worcester, being licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado, hereby certifY that the subject lands are owned in fee simple by the City of Aspen." Include a notarization. 6. The owner's certificate should include language dedicating easements and public rights-of-way shown on the plat and should reference the approving ordinance. 7. As with the Aspen Meadows SPA final plat, there should be certificates for all of the utilities to approve th.e proposed utility plans. This is condition 6 in the approving ordinance. 8. It is recommended that the plat preparer be provided with a copy of the approving ordinance. A copy is attached. Add a general note reflecting condition number 7. Add information reflecting condition number 8. 9. The title that was "planriing director" had been changed to "Community Development Director." Include language in the certificate that reflects condition numbers 11,31 and 32. 10. In the city engineer's certificate, include language that reflects condition numbers 16 and 25. 11. Note that the fmal plat submission should be through the community development department and that they also should review the plat to determine that their conditions of approval are incorporated. . 12. Has condition 20 been met? The plat should include a certificate for the Parks Director that includes language reflecting this condition. I will be glad to answer your questions regarding this plat map submittal. Otherwise, SGM will need to revise the mylars and re-submit them to Community Development for approval signatures. cc: Stan Clauson, Community Development Director M96.270 2 .~ S'PA fl..-AT-Cb/Jle:NIs ~ II Ui-ec{<:..- us"':{ '.~ .,-,...- ~l'l'{ I fkgAS-P~ Ti Lo-r c6.80.01O 4-- <Chapter 26.80----::::> eSPECIALLY PLANNED AREA (SPA0 Sections: 26.80.010 26.80.020 26.80.030 . . 26.80.040 . r Purpose. Applicability. Designation of specially planned area (SPA). Development in a specially planned area (SPA). 26.80.010 Purpose. The purpose of a specially planned area (SPA) is to: A. Provide design flexibility for land which requires innovative consideration in those circwnstances where traditional zoning teclmiques do not adequately address its historic significance, natural fealures. uriique physical character, or location, and where potential exists for conununity benefit fromcomprehensi\'e development. . B. Allow the development of mixed land uses through the encouragementof innov~tive design practices which peimit variations from standard zone district land uses and dimensional requirements. C. Establish a procedure by which land upon which multiple uses exist, or are considered appropriate. can be pl3IU1ed and redeveloped in a way that provides for the greatest public benefit. (Code 1971. S 7-801) 26.80.020 Applicability. Before any development shall occur on land designated specially planned area (SPA) on the official zone district map, or before development can occur as a specially planned area (SPA), it shall comply with the . requirements <?f this chapter. (Code 1971; S 7-802) .. 26.80.030 Designation of specially planned area (SPA). A. Standards for designation. Any land in the city may be designated specially plmmedarea (SPA) by the city council if, becal)se of its unique historic, natural, physical, or locational characteristics. it would be of great public benefit to the city for that land to be alloWed design flexibility and I() be pianned and developed comprehensively asa multiple use development. A parcel of land designated specially plarmed area (SPA) shall also be designated on the city's official zone district map with the underlying zolle district designation which is detennined the most appropriate. The W1derlying zone district designation shall be used as a guide. but not an absolute limitation, to the uses and development which may be considered during the development review process. B. Procedure for designation, amendment, rescinding. Any parcel that meets the standards established in Section 26.80.030(A) may be designated specially planned area (SPA) pursuant to review and recommendation by the commission and. approval by the city council pumiant to the procedures eslablished in Common Procedures, . Chapter 26.52. The bOundaries of a parcel previously designated specially planned area (SPA) may be amended following the same procedures used in designating a parcel specially planned area (SPA). The removal of .. . a specially plarmed area (SPA) designation from a parcel shall follow the same procedures used in designating the.parcel specially planned area (SPA) but shall require demonstration of why the land no.ionger meets the standards established in Section 26.80.030(A). > . A<-.S6 CfiecK QONDI(1Js CJ'F -NYFo-JAL- 617 (Asf'c:n 10/95) ~ ,-" ').. 26.80.030 C. Recordation of designation. Upon the effective date ,?f an act by the city cQuncil designating a specially pi armed area (SPA), the planned director shall notify the city clerk of the designation,who shall record among !he real estate records of the clerk and recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. a certified copy of !he ordinance. The ordinance shall include a legal description of the property which is being designated specially planned area (SPA). D. Placement on city's official zone district map. Upon the effective date of an act by !he city cOMci I designating a specially planned area (SPA), the planning director shall place the SPA designation and underlying zone district designation on the city's official zone district map. (Code 1971, 9 7-803) 26.80.040 Development in a specially planned area (SPA). A. . Overview of development review. Any developme,nt within a specially planned area (SPA) shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures and SIJlIIdards in this section and Common Procedures, Chapter 2Q.52. The procedure requires review and approval of a conceptual development plan and final development plan by !he commission and city council with public hearings occurring at the time of conceptual development plan review by city council and final dev~lopment plan review by the commission. A development application for specially planned area (SPA) designation shall be reviewed and considered concurrently wi!h a development application for a conceptual development plan, ar.d shall require public hearings to be held by both !he corrunissiQn and city council. An applicant may request and !he planning director may determine that because of the limited extent of the issues involved in a proposed Specially Planned Area.in relation to these review procedures and standards, or becatise .of a significant community interest which the project would serve, it is appropriate to consolidate conceptual and Imal development plan review. The planning director shall consider whether the full four step review would be redundant and serve no public purpose and inform !he applicant during the pre-application stage of whe!her consolidation will be pennitled. An application which isdetennined to be eligible for consolidalion shall be processed pursuant 10 the terms and procedures of final development plan' review. The commission or !he "City Council may, during review; determine !hat the application should be . subject to bo!h conceptual and final plan review, in whiCh case consolidated review shall not occur. B. Review standards for development in a specially planned area (SPA). In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the commission and city counci I . shall consider the following. I. Whe!her the proposed development is compatible wi!h or enhances !he mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in telIDs of land use, density, height, bulk. architecture, landscaping and open space. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exiSlto service the proposed deveIOpmen!. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and !he possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. 4. . Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning lechniques to preserve signific;mt view planes. avoid adverse environmental impacts aild provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. 6. Whether the proposed devdopment will require the.expenditure oi excessive public funds to provide pilblic facilities for the parcel. or the surrounding neighborhood. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of tw~nty (20) percent meet !he slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.84.030(B){2){b). (A>pCn 10195) 618 . ,~ r--.. ,,-. , ~6.S0.(\'\O , . 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. The burden shall rest upon an applicant 10 demonstrate the general reasonableness and suitability oi the propoSed development, and itsconfonnity.to the slJindardsand procedures of this chapter and section; provided. however. that in the review of the Conceptual development plan, consideration will be given only to the generJ.! . concept for the development, while during the review of the final developmemplan, detailed eValuation ,.f the specific aspects of the development will be accompiished. C. Concepiual development plan. I. Contents of application. The contents of the development application for a conceplual development plan shall include the following. a. The general application infonnation required in Common Procedures, Section 26:52.030. b. A conceptual description of the pmposed development This shall include but not be limited to a statement of the intent of the. proposed development and a conceptual description of proposed land uses. densities. design concepts, access ways, and a general time schedule for construction of the proposed development .c. A statement outlining in conceptual tenns how the proposed development will be served with the appropriate public facilities and how assurances will be made that those public facilities are available to serve . the proposed development. d. A conceptual site plan, illustrating: (I). Existing natural and manmade features. (2) General configuration of proposed land uses, access ways, and existing and proposed utilities. (3) Schematic drawings of proposed buildings, indicating general site design features. and overall mass and height of proposed SUUClUres. 2. Effect of approval of conceptual developmenl plan. Approval of a conceptual development plan shall not constitute fin3J approval for development in a specially planned area (SPA), or pennission to proceed with development.: Such approvalsbalJ onlY- constitute authorization to pioceed with a development application for a final development plan. 3. Limitation on approval of conceptual development plan. A development application for afmaJ development plan shall be submitted within two (2) years of the dateof approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless an extension is granted by the city council prior to expiration, failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of a conceptual development plan. D. Final develOPment plan. I. Contents of application. The contents of a development application for a final development plan . shaH include the following. a. The general application imonnation required in Section 26.52.030. b. A precise plan of the proposed development including but notlirnited to proposed land uses. densities. landscaping, internal traffic circulation, and accessways. The precise plan shall be in sufficient detail to enable evaluation of the architectural, landscaping, and design features of the proposed development. It shall show the location and floor area of all existing and proposed buildings and other improvements including heights, dwelling unit types and nonresidential facililies. c. A statement specifying the underlying zone district on the parcel and. if variations are proposed. a statement of how the variations comply with the standards of Seclion 26.80.040(B). d. A statement outlining a developmeni schedule specifyin~ the date construction is proposed 10 be initiated and completed. . 619 (Aspen 10/95) .'-" ~ .26.80.040 e. A statement specifying the public facilities thai wiil be needed to accommodate the proposed devel- opment, and what specific assurances will be made to ensure that public facilities willbe available to accommodate the proposed development. . r. A statement of the reasonable conformance of the final development plan with the approval granted . .',' . ' ! to the conceptual d~velopmenl plan and with the original intent of the city council in d.esignating the parcel . specially planned) area (SPA). .' . .. 1. 1 ~ g. A plat which depicts the applicable infonnation required by Section 2():88.<>>O(D)(I)(a)(3) and (D)(2)(a). < 2. Variations pennitted. The final development plan shall comply with the requirements of the underlying zone district; provided, however, that variations from-those requirements may be allowed based on the standards of Section 26.80.040(B). Variations may be allowed for the following requirements: open space. minimum distance between buildings, maximum height, minimum fronl yam, minimum rear yam, minimum side yard. minimum lot width, minimum lot area, trash access area, internal floor area ratio~ number of off-stre~t parking spaces and uses, and design standardS of Section 26.88.040(C)(4) for streets and related improvements. Any variations allowed shall be specified in the SF A agreement" and shown on the final development plan. 3. SPA agreement. Upon approval of a final development plan, the applicant and the city council shall enter into an agreement binding the real property to any conditions placed on the development order approving the fmal development plan, and providing landscape and public facilities guarantees as specified in Section 26.84.040(C) and (D). 4. . Recordation. The final development plan, which shall consist, as applicable, of final drawings.depicting the site plan, landscape plan, utility plan and building elevations, and Specially Planned Area'(SP A) agreement sh.a11 be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Oerk and Recorder, and shall be binding upon the property owners subject to the developl.Dent order, their successors and assigns, aild shall constitute the development regulations for the property. Development of the property shall be limited to the uses; density, configuration, and all other elements and conditions sel forth on the fmal development plan and SPA agreement. Failure on the part of the .applicant to recom the final development plan and SPA agreement within a period of orie . hundred and eighty (180) days following its approval by city council shall render the plan invalid. Reconsideration of the fmal development plan and SPA agreement by the commission and city council will be required before its acceptance and recording. E. Amendment to final development plan. \. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered ail insubstantial amendment: a. A change in the use or character of the development. b. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. c. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation raleS of the proposed. development. or the demand for public facilities. d. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space. e. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parldng and loading space. r. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. g. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. . h. An increase by greater than one (I) percent in the approved residential density of the development: (Asren 10195) 620 ~ "-', 26.80.040 i. Any change which is iJlC9nsistent with a conditioner representation of the project's original approval or which requires grariting of a furthenariation from the project's approved use or dimensional requi'rements. 2. All othermodifiC3tions shall be approved pursuant to the tenns and procedures of the .final development plan,provided that the proposed change is consistent with or an enhancement of the approved final development plan. If the proposed change is not consistent fith the approved final develqpment planf the amendment shall be subject to both conceptual and final development plan review an(l'approval. . ' 3. During the review' of the prcpOsed amendment, the comrrlission and ~ity council may require such conditions of approval as are ~ to ii>sure ~ the development will be compatible with current cOlDlIlunity conditions. This shall include,.but not be limited to, applying to the portions of the development which have not obtained building permits or are proposed to be. amended any new community policies or regulations which have been implemented .since the original approval, or taking into consideJ1ltion changing community circumstances as they affect the project's original representations and commitments. . The .applicant may withdraw the proposed amendment at any time during the review process. (Ord. No. 7-1989, ~ 2; Or<!. No. 13-1991, ~ 3; Or<!. No. 24-1993, ~ 2; Ort!. No. 22-1995, ~ 13: Code 1971, ~ 7-804) 621 (Aspen 10/95) ,-.. ,-.. ,I. Q6.88~040-=> (2) Cilsh-in-Lieu Payment Paymeilt of cash in-lieu of a land dedication shall be made to !he city prior to and on a proportional. basis to !he issuance of any building permits for the residential dwelllng units. e. Use of Land and Use.of FWlds. (I) Land. All lands dedicated to the city pursuant to this section shail be held by the city for the Aspen School District, untili such time as they shall be requested by !he School District for school purposeS. The Aspen School District shall.be responsible for maintenance of said lands in a reasonable marmer while they are being helJ by the city. . . (2) Funds. All funds collected pursuant 10 this division shall be transferred by !he building inspector to the finance director. All funds so collected shall be properly identified and promptly deposited in a designated account Funds withdrawn from this. fund shall be used exclusively for the pprposes specified herein. (a). Oty Shall TranSIer Funds to School District Funds collected pursuant to this division shall be remitted at least monthly to the Aspen School District. The Aspen School District shall deposit said funds into an interest- bearing account authorized by law. The Aspen School District shall be !he owners of the funds in !he account, but !he signature of !he chief financial officer of the Aspen School District., or his or .her designee, and !he signature of !he finance director of the Oty of Aspen, or his or her designee, .shall be required for !he withdrawal of mouies from the account (b) . Administrative Fee. The city shall be entitled to re1ain two (2) percent of !he funds collected to compensa(e it for its administrative expenses of tollecting the fees. Said fees shall be deposited in the city's General Revenue fund to be expended as !he city shall determine in its sole discrelion. . (c) Use of Land or Funds for Housing. If theScl1001 District decides that land or funds dedicated. pursuant . to this section sl10uld be used for housing, then !he School District shall place.adeed restriction on !hose housing units, restricting !heir occupancy solely to School District employees and their immediate families. In !he event !he inventory of housing exceeds !he district's needs, the School Board may allow occupancy of the units through the Housing Au!hority. f. Periodic Review. In order to ensure that the land dedication standards which are assessed are fair . and represent the current level of service provided by the Aspen School District., !he dedication schedule shall be reviewed by !he city, together with the School District, and amended as necessary within three (3) years. of its effective date and every three (3) years thereafter. ~. D. Procedure. Prior to approval of a development order for subdivision, an applicant shall have a development application for plat reviewed and recommended for approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval by the commission, and !hen reviewed and approved, approved with conditions, or disapproved by the city council pursuant to !he procedures of this section and !he Common Procedures, Chapter 26.52. PI. Review by commission.. . r a. Contents of application. The contents of a development application for plat for review by the commission . shall include the following. . . .. (I) The general application information required in Common Procedures, Section 26.52.030. (2) One (1) inch equals four hundred (400) feet scale city map showing !he location of the proposed subdivision, all adjacent lands owned by or under option to !he applicant, commonly known landmarks, and the zone district in which !he proposed subdivision and adjacent properties are located. ~ (3) (1 pl~hiCh reflects the layout of the lots, blocks and structures in the proposed subdivision. The r plat shall be drawn at a scale of one (I) equals one.~.undred (100) feet or larger. Architectural scales are not . .aq;eptable. Sheet size shall be twenty-four (24) niches by thirty-six (36) inches. If it is necessary to place the plat on more than a one (I) sheet, ar(Inde'X)hall be included on the first sheet A@cinity m~hall also appear on the first sheet showing the subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city and the street system in the area of the proposed subdivision. The contents of the plat shall be of sufficient detail to determine whether CA,p=SI96l 642 . ( ( ~ t (\ i'-Pt> GIE',,,J-'L ~ ~Cl~ 6 ~()\JS ri'-s 26.88.D40 the proposed subdivision will meet the design standards of this chapter and this title, and shall contain the following itemized information. (a) Thenaine of the proposed subdivision, which shall not be the same or similar to any name used on a recorded plat in Pitkin County. Colorado. (b) The name, ad~, and lelephone number of the owner/a.pplicant, designer of the proposed sutxlivision. and the 'licensed surveyor-'. . f.. .' . . ~(:~ ~e location and bo.jIidaries of the proposed ~,jbdivision. .... C d mop dlbwing the.eXisting and proposed contours of the land in the proposed subdivision 31 rwo-fool intervals, where the slope is less ihan ten (10) percent, and five-foot intervals where the slope is ten (10) percent or grealer, and the designation of aU areas with slope greater than thirty (30) percent CJe) The locati~d dimensions of all existing streets, alleys, easements, drainage areas, inigation ditches. public and pnvate utilities, and other significant marunade ornaturaI features within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision rc (ft . The 100000on~ dimensions of all proposed streets, alleys, easements, drainage improvements. utilities, lot lines, and areas or structures reserved or dedicated for public or common use. in the proposed subdivision. C (~e locatio~ize. and type of eXisting vegetation and other n3lUraJlandscape features, and the proposed Imlts of any eX9U'ation-tl~grading in the proposed subdivision, including the 10c31ion of trees with a trunk diameter ofiSix (6) iru:b~s or more measured four and one-half (4 1/2) feet above the ground, and an indication of which trees are pr(j~d to be removed. Where large groves are. to remain undisturbed, sino n located. ---..... . . . . . . (h) . . The designation all areas that constitule na1nraI hazard areas inCluding but not limited 10 snowslides, avalanche, muds I e, rockslide and the one.hun4red"year floodplain. (i) Such additional information on geological or soil stability, avalanche potential, projected traffic generation, air pollution and similar matters as may be required by the planning agency' or other reviewing agency. (j) Such other information as may be required by the planning agency or other reviewing agency in order 10 adequately describe roposed utility systems, . age plans, surface in!provements, or other CQnstruction projects conlemplated within the propo su IVlsion in order to assure that the proposed subdivision is capable of being cOllS!ructed without an adverse effect upon the surrounding area. (k) Site data tabulation listing acreage of land in the proposed subdivision, number, type and typical size of lots, structures and/or dwelling units; number of bedrooms pe,r dwelling unit; ground coverage of ro sed structures and improvements inclu~ parking ~tS@Iewar~d open space, and e amount 0 ~Cei11~ being provided pursuant 10 Section 26.88.040(C)(5)(a). In the case of a division of land into condominium inlerests, apartments or other multi-family or time-share dwelling W1its, the location of all proposed structures, parking areas. structures and/or areas for common use. '([m) Wh~ t:iW proposed subdivision coversonIy a part of the applicant's adjacent holdings, a sketch plan for such other lands shall be submitted, and the proposed streets, utilities, easements, and other improvements of the tract under review shall be considered with reference 10 the proposed development of the adjacent holdings.. . I ~ (n) Letters from the public or p,ovate utility companies that will service the proposed subdivision :f; . I.. .. gas. electri~ity, telephones, sanitiry sewer. water, and fire protection facilities stating they can service~ proposed subdivision. ~o D.1. 0.... . (3') 643 (Aspen 5/96) r- ,-., j 26.88.040 .:~ ' ~;v,?~~~~~~:i~:~~~:::::~~~:~t::~::en;~~~m~~~~:;~8e:~~~ ( infonnation shall be obtained from the Community Development Department f 2. Review by city council.. .' ") a. Additional application contents prior to revie"i by city council. SubseqUent to review by the commission ] and prior to review of the development applicaJ,fon for plat by the city council, the applicant shall submit . . I . the following additional application contents. 1 1 . (1) A final plat drawn with permanent ink on reproducible linen or . hall be twenty-four (2;4) inches by thirty-six (36) inches with an unencumbered margin 0 0 e and one-half (I I inches on the left hand side of the sheet and a one-half (1/2) inch margin y:e the other three (3) sides of the sheet. It ~in~: . (c (a) ..J<tcurate dimensions for aJllines, angles and curves used to. describe boundaries, streets, setbacks, alleys, easements, structures, areas to be reselVed or dedicated for public or common use and other imponant features. All curves shall be circular arcs and shall be defined by the radiuS, centraI angle, tangent, arc and chord distances. All dimensions. both linear and angular, are to be detennined by anaccUrale control survey ~ in the field which must balance and close within a limit of one (1) in. ten .thousand (10,000). ' <Z!iil)A systematic identification of all lots and blocks and names for all streets. ~ Names of all adjoining subdivisions with dotted lines of abutting lots. If adjoining land is unplatted. it sh~ shown as such. . . ~ An identification of the streets, alleys, parks, and other public areas or faciliiieS; and a dedi~ation thereof to the public use. An identification of the easements as dedicated to public use. Areas reserved for futu~bli~ acquisition shall also be shown. . . . I..J!;:t A written survey description of the area includin.g the total acreage to the nearest one-thousandth (0.001) of an acre. . @)A description of all survey monuments, botlrfound and set, which marlc the boundaries of the Subdi vi- sion, and description .of all monwnents used in conducting the sulVey. The O>lorado Coordinate System may be ~ A statement by the I~d surveyor explaining how bearings, if used, were detennined. tm) A certificate by the registered land surveyor as to the accuraey of the survey and plat, and a statement that the survey was perfonned in accordance with O>loradO Revised Statutes 1973, Title 38. Article 5.1. as . iun~m time to time. '. . ~A certificate by a corporale title insurer, lhat.the person or persons dedicating to the public the public rights-of-way, areas or facilities as shown thereon are the owners thereof in fee simple. free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. . . t ('ffiJ Certificates showing approval of the final plat by the city engineer, planning director and the. corrunission. ~ A certificate showing approval of the plat and acceptance of dedications and easements by the city council, with signature by the mayor and attestation by the city clerk. . ~ A certificate of filing for the Pitkin County cleric and recorder. . @O>mplete engineering plans and specifications for aU improvements to be installed in the proposed subdivision, in.c1udmg but not limited to water and sewer utilities, streets and related improvements. trails, b~d stonn drainage improvements. . .. I. I ~ ~/ ~ A landscape plan showing location, siie, and type of proposed landscape featUres.. .' . . (10) Copies of any monument records required Ofth.. eland sUlVeyor in accordance with Colorado!Revised . Statutes 1973. Title 38, Article 53, as amended from time to time. . . . t (A.<p= 5196) 644 r-, ~ <, :,". 26.88.040 ~ ' , , , .' (HlADy,agreements with utility orditch companies, ~henapplicable. . . \ . L (12) Any Subdivision agreements as required by Section 26.88.040(C)(3)., ' . -.:JL.- , b. Submission of development application \() city council. The development application shall be submined to the city council for final review. The development applicatiOl') for plat shall tie approved or approved with coriditions by the city council if it confOJUlS Co the standaros of Section 26.88.040(C), or it shall be denied, (Oid. 'No. 47-1988, S 9; Ord. No. 69-1994, S I; Ord. Nl>. 22-1995, ~ 18; Ord. No. 32-1995, S 1; Ord. No: 54-1995" ~ 1: Code 1971, ~ 7-10(4) 1 . . i, 26.88.050 Subdivision agreement. A. General. Prior to approval of Plat for a subdivision, the applicant and city council shall enter into a subdivision agreement binding .the subdivision to any conditions placed on the development. order. II. C()mmon park and recreation areas. The subdivision agreementshall outline any agreement on the part of the applicant, to deed public lands, open space, public facilities, and' other improvements to tbe city or other entity. C. Landscape guarantee. In order to ensure implementation and maintenance of the landscape pI an. the city council may require the applicant to provide a guarantee for no less than one hundred twenty-five (125) percent of the current estimated cost of the landscaping improvements in the approved landscape plan. as estimated by the city engineer, \() ensure the installation of all landscaping shown and the .cOntinued maintenance and replacement of the landscaping for a period of two (2) ye:us after installation. The guarantee shall be in the form of a cash eScrow with the city, or a bank or savings and loan association, or an irrevocable sight draft or letter of commitment from a financially responsible lender and shall give the city the unconditional right upon demand to partially or fully Complete or pay for any improvements or pay any outstanding bills, or to withdraw funds upon demand to partially or fully complete or pay -for any improvements or pay for any improvement or pay any outstanding bills for woric done thereon by any party. As. portions of the landsCaping improvements are completed, the city engineer shall inspect them, and . upon approval and acceptance, shall anthorize the release of the agreed estimated cost for that portion of the improvements, except that ten (10) percent shall be withlield until all proposed improvements are completed and approved, and an addition:iJ twenty-five (25) pen:ent, which shall be retained until the improvements have been maintained in a satisfactoty condition for two (2) years. . . D. Public facilities gu,arantee. ln order to ensure installation of necessary public facilities planned to accommodate the subdivision, the city council shall require the applicant to provide a guarantee for no less ,than one hundred (100) pen:ent of the current estimated cost of such public improvements, as estimated by the city engineer. The guarantee shall be in the foJUI specified in Section 26.88.050(c) and may be drawn upon by the city as specified therein. As portions of the public facilities improvements, are completed, the city engineer shall inspect them, and upon approval and acceptance; shall anthorize the release of the agreed estimated cost for that portion of the improvements, except ten (10) percent which shall be withheld until all proposed improvements are completed and approved. E. Recordation. The subdivision agreement and plat shall be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County cleric and record;r.Failure on the part of the applicantto record the plat within a period of one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by the city council shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration and approval 06 the plat by the commission and city council will be required before its acceptance and recording, unless . an extension or waiver is granted by city council for a shoWing of good cause. The subdivision plat shall also be submitted in a digital fonnat acceptable to the Cbminunity Development Department, for incorporation into the City/County GIS system. The one hundred eighty (180) day recordation requirement contained herein shall nOLapply to the ,recording of condominium maps~ or declarations or any other documents required to 644-) (Aspen 5/96) . . . , .' ~ ~l~W'WI.u F.vL(Y~ , \1, ;<'l,q", ~ November 19, 1996 . Stan Clauson Community Development Director City of Aspen. 130 S. Galena Street' Aspen, co 81601 II THE CITY OF ASPEN Re: Insubstantial Amendmerit to the Final Plat Reference Ordinance No. 23 (Series of 1996) Water Treatment Plant Improvements & Affordable Housing Project Dear Stan: The purpose of this letter is to submit to you for authorization several insubstantial amendments to'the development plan for above referenced Project. All of the changes are 'consistent with a condition or representation of the ProJect's original approval. I, Reference Condition #20 Change the condition to require that the park design shall pe su\:>mitted to the Parks Departn1ent for approval prior to the recording of the SPA Plan; to require that the park design shall be. submitted to the Parks Departn1ent for approval prior' to issul1;nce a Certificate of Occupancy for any units within the Project. . 2. Reference Condition #31 . Change the condition to require that the applicant shall submit proposed land~caping screening or other form of buffering between'Doolittle Drive and the single-family units for approval prior to the recording of the SPA Plan; to require that.the:appliCailt shall submit proposed landscaping screening or other form of buffering between Doollttle Drive and the single~family units for approval prior to iSsuance' a Certificate of Occupancy for any units within the Project. 3. Reference Condition #32 , Change the condition to require that the applicant shall revise the elevations for the ' . single family homes on the west side of Doolittle Drive to achieve compliance with Ordinance 30 for approval prior to. the recording of the SPA Plan; -to require that the applicant shall revise the elevations for the single family homes on the west side of Doolittle Drive tp achieve compliance with.OrdinanQe 30 for approval prior to issuance a Building Permit for any single family unit within the Project. 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET. ASPEN, COLORADC? 8161f . PHONE303.920.5000 . FAX 303.920.5197 Printedonrecycledl"'per . ~, . 1""". ~ 4. The location of the new 4,200 s.f. Storage Building, Storage Bins and Yard Area has been moved and located approximately 100 ft. north of the originally proposed site to minimize disturbance of the native Gamble Oaks. 5. The boundary property line bordering th~ westerly edge of the single family housing sites will be established subsequent to the determination, relocation and completion of the Meadowood Ditch, The final boundary shall be recorded in the qffice .of th~ Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder and shall be binding upon the property prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for any single unit within the Project. . All the above is in response to the concerns listed in Chuck Roth's memorandum dated November 8, 1996. SGM, Engineers will address the remaining items and re-submit the mylars early next week for approval signatures by the City. The recordation of the development plan requires your authorization of all insubstantial amendments. Please let me know if the above meets with your approval. " David Hauter, Asset Manager City of Aspen c.c. Jay HanurlOnd Chuck Roth Suzanne Wolff ~~ PLANNING & ZC. .iNG COMMISSION r'\ .mLY 2,1996 Hunt stated that he would be more comfortable with this without the ADU's and the impact of the additional two family Units. In a straw vote for the appropriateness of two ADU's on this site, the Commission voted 6-1 against. Derrington said that they are sufficiently below the allowable FAR, we could go in and build the project, pretty much as is without the ADU so the bulk and mass will not go away. Blaich stated that he recognizes that but there will not be two extra family units there. Derrington stated that whether or not Bibbig has 10 people more, living in his house than allowed by the code is out of our control and we can not deal with that, we can try to get the right-of-way dedicated for access and we would be building the driveway and intersection to the street to city standards, he said they would be glad to do landscape enhancement at the street intersection and or along the driveway and regrade part of his top parcel that was necessary to make his parking area and lawn accessible. Derrington said that we do not know, definitely that the people who rent this place will have a car, they may walk everywhere and their car might just sit there, he said it is hard to second guess the use of the ADU' s.. Derrington stated that he would prefer to have this tabled to discuss the ramifications with the owner. MOTION: Hunt moved to table action and continue the public hearing for the Colas Investments for Conditional Use Review for two Accessory Dwelling Units and Stream Margin Review to' 8/6/96, at the request ofthe applicant. Seconded by Mooney. All in favor, motion carries, Mooney asked if this was split off of Bibbig's PUD, maybe there are some references in this PUD that will help determine what kind of dedicated right-of-way we can expect. PUBLIC HEARING: Waterplace Affordable Housing Final SPA Review Steve Buettow stepped down. Proof of notice provided. 9 r-,. PLANNING & ZO, ,.NG COMMISSION r-, .nJLY 2,1996 Michaelson stated that this is a request for Final SPA approval for the City of Aspen Water Treatment Plant Affordable Housing project, it calls for development of 22 deed restricted affordable housing units and the renovation of one unit which will make 23 deed restricted units as well as significant improvements to the water treatment facilities, the City Council approved the conceptual SPA on May 22, 1996, ordinance 15, series 1996, the conditions of approval were identical to the ones from the Planning Commission hearings, Michaelson said in addition to Final SPA approval the applicants are requesting Subdivision to create the 4.39 parcel that will be developed for housing as well as a subdivision of the residential parcels, in addition the applicants are required to obtain conditional use approval for affordable housing in a public zone district, a GMQS Exemption for affordable housing (will be approved by Council), Special Review for parking, open space, and dimensional requirements for affordable housing projects as well as 8040 Greenline Review, the Housing Office has approved the mix and a request to reduce the net livable in some of the single family units to approximately 1400 s.f. Michaelson stated that there have been three changes since conceptual approval; 1) Doolittle Road, we have always struggled with Doolittle Road, up until this point they could not get a design that met city standards in terms of grade and turning radius, those issues have been addressed; 2) when the topo's were completed the designs were slightly changed, the units on the East side of Doolittle became a little more constrained into the open space, to stay away.from the slope, Staff supports that, we would rather them get tighter and closer together than into the oak scrub on the edge of the slope or the slopes behind that and; 3) the single family units on the West side of Doolittle, Council was concern that the design was somewhat traditional it proposed a single cul-de-sac, it was more . vehicular friendly than pedestrian friendly, now there are two road cuts accessing the six units, the circulation is narrower and less dominate than a cul-de-sac, there is also a series of hammerheads to provide access and turn around, it is a little more consistent with Council's direction to Staff to look at some new urbanism concepts to limit the impact of the automobile and make these units function more as a neighborhood, he thinks this design does that. Michaelson stated that several members of the public said the bus stop on Castle Creek and Doolittle had some problems, busses are in a travel lane when they pull over and there is very little dwell space for people waiting to board the bus, he has proposed to move the bus stop back 10', bring out a bus pocket to get the bus out of the travel lane and a slight realignment of the trail, one justification for this site and density proposed is, it is close to transit, there is a proposed trail down the slope that will access the RFTA bus stop and he thinks that it is a reasonable expectation on the city to improve the bus stop. Staff recommends approval with conditions. 10 ~. PLANNING & ZOl ,~l~G COMMISSION .~ .JULY 2,1996 Hunt asked if a plan for major grading or contour changes has been submitted. Michaelson responded that there is a map that shews existing and proposed grading, one thing that helped is that the topo lines got a little more extreme pushing in the envelopes as you get closer to the loop, he said for the most part they have done a pretty good job keeping those envelopes off the slopes particularly On the single family side. Hunt stated that one of his major concerns is the buildings along the hill, he does not want to see a scar hanging out in front of our faces. Michaelson stated that they reviewed the grading plan but he is not sure they can say what the cut will be, up there. Tom Stevens, representing applicant said that once they received the accurate topo information it required a change of virtually everything on this project, he said that they will have about 3' of grade change and on those particular units they are proposing basements that will sink the side of the building and the siding will follow existing grade. Stevens stated that they can not represent that construction will not scar the site. Hunt asked ifthe buildings are visible from Castle Creek Road. Stevens said they would. Hunt asked if it would give the appearance of a tall building on that side. Scott Smith, Gibson-Reno architects responded that there will be a vegetative buffer, at an angle you may see the top of the roof. David Hauter, Asset Manager stated that he supports the improvement and re- building of the bus stop, he said he received a letter from Castle Ridge about some large boulders on the steep hillside, they would like those to be removed and it will be looked into. Hauter said this is not a conventional, drive to your front door suburban type site plan, the transportation components have been emphasized, the architecture is responsive to the new urbanism influences and if this project is approved they would like to start the construction on the traffic corridor this fall, the project will probably be built out over two years and the final phase of Doolittle Drive improvements, the curb and gutter will probably not come until after the housing is built which may not start, in earnest until next Spring. Mooney stated that he felt comfortable with the design and development work of the affordable housing project, but was not aware of the expansion of the water treatment facility in conjunction with the work that is going to be done, there will be an additional 10,000 s.f. of facility at the water treatment plant. Mooney said that when square footage is expanded mitigation is required, will we be told, after 11 .,-" PLANNING & ZO" .NG COMMISSION ~ JULY 2.1996 the expansion of 10,000 s.f. that these houses will be needed to mitigate the what the water treatment expansion. Michaelson stated that essential public facilities are exempt from GMQS however, Council has to find that waiving that mitigation is warranted and appropriate. Hauter said they are consolidating things at the plant, they are tearing down an existing building and moving 5 people up to the plant, the plant has approximately 15 people and that is not going to change. Hauter stated that the new chlorine response building will not add additional personnel, it is an incident command center, it is new square footage but not new people. Jay Hammond, Consultant stated that one of the consistent concerns raised by the neighb?rs is the access up into the site, as Doolittle passes the Castle Ridge and Twin Ridge entries it runs through a fairly sharp curve and climbs steeply into the lower site, the existing road has a radius, in the lower curve of about 65' , it is upwards of 11 and 12% in some of the steeper areas, there is a tendency to rush this road to get up it due to its steep conditions and short curve radius. Hammond said the grade maximum, they would like to stick to is about 10%, the radius called for in the regulations is a minimum of 100', he said they have drawn the road to meet city standards, the effort has been to stay as closely as possible to the existing platform to minimize disturbance in both directions above and below the road cut. Hammond said their assumption on the lower slope has been that they would bring it back to 2:1 to catch existing grade, it might go a little bit steeper, this will tend to minimize the cut requirements by not pushing the curve up into the slope, on the flip side with the curve radius at 100' there will be more of a cut condition, there will be a boulder retaining wall of around 4' in height, this will also help minimize the slope disturbance. Hammond noted that there is a little bit of reverse curve as it ties into the upper alignment, it looks a little funny but there is a fixed structure at the Meadow Wood Pump Station and a couple of water line crossings in the area that are also fixed, the road can not swing across or we will get into the pump station and a lot more complexity with respect to utility disturbance on the main transmission line. Stevens stated that he met with the Parks Department and have reviewed a revegetation plan, the county has a seed mix they would like used, with that they will use a combination oftop soil and sand mixture and a temporary irrigation system for at least the first growing season, he said he anticipated the first two. 12 1"'"", PLANNING & ZO, d.NG COMMISSION ~ .nns 2, 1996 Hammond said there have been discussions on trying to establish traffic calming efforts on the road alignment to keep speed down, they are posting 20 m.p;h. at the top and at the entry as the road passes the Twin Ridge intersection, they will include signs restricting cyclists from using the lower portion of the road, at the intersection of the housing and Doolittle drive they show a two-way stop, the concern of a four-way stop is that it will generate a noise problem for the housing, there will be a grade descending sign at the top of the grade so that truck traffic will know to use the low gear. Stevens stated that they can not make this project disappear it is two-story residential structures, if driving by on 82 or flying you are going to see this project, what can be done is to incorporate as many measures as possible to reduce the impact of it so we will not see blank facades lined up across the hill. Stevens said the East side of the project is concept driven, it is fairly flat and what has come through all of the meetings is the desire for an auto disincentive, pedestrian oriented, socially interactive design and he feels this designs speaks well to that, all of the homes are oriented on to a central open space, the architecture has oriented the kitchens to the open space, spaces have been designed for outdoor living areas and Rocky Mountain Institute has suggested that individual areas be identified for garden space, the parking is clustered on the project, they have pitched the parking lot in grade down so it will be buried 2' at the edge, they will bring the earth along the road up 2', it is a fairly gentle mound so it won't look like an earth fence but in combination there will be 4' of hard buffer between the road and the end units, in addition scrub oak has been added to help minimize the impact. Stevens stated that the West side is single-family detached, Council did not want to see the conventional cul-de-sac design that was presented at the conceptual submission, they wanted the road to playa lessor important role in the layout ofthose units, to maintain fire access they have basically designed a driveway, the slope on this site became an asset as it dictated stepping these units into the hillside creating garage or unfinished basement space. Smith stated that two of the most important architectural features on this project were the overall building massing and materials, with the massing they were hoping to use simple building shapes and volurnes, the roofs are simple gables, cross gables, a few gable dormers to add interest to the facades. Smith said they added simple shed porches at the entries, all the units have a 6' deep entry porch breaking up the vertical massing as well as creating a nice interaction space, the units were staggered slightly so it will not be a long row of uninterrupted facades and a tall row a buildings, the end units were stepped down from two-story units to one-story also reducing the visual mass and softening the edges. Smith said the 13 r-, PLANNING & 20, ,tNG COMMISSION ,-., JULY 2,1996 out buildings were kept very low and simple and will use the same materials as the units, the materials selected are primarily traditional natural materials, the siding combination of horizontal lap wood siding, cedar shingle siding, rough sawn cedar plywood and batten siding and an untreated corrugated metal siding in some locations will break up the massing, the roofing materials anticipated would be asphalt shingles, untreated corrugated metal roofing that will weather to a dark rust brown color and some type of treated corrugated metal roof that will have a darker gray color to it, by mixing the colors and materials throughout, the project will maintain visual interest, break up the massing and scale of the buildings and add a personalized touch for the individual units. Stevens stated that P&Z provides a final vote on the Conditional Use to allow affordable housing in the public zone district, Special Review for parking, open space and the dimensional requirements and 8040 Greenline. Stevens said the parking has been divided into two different types, there is a total of35 spaces on the East side, two spaces per each one, two and three bedroom unit, one space for each studio and four spaces for guests, on the West side, the single-family each unit has a two car garage with the exception of the existing home which has a two car surface in addition to that there is an additional two car apron behind the garage. Garton asked what the handkerchief parking lot on the other side of the chlorine response area is. Stevens responded that the Water department wanted additional parking spaces for the chlorine response building, he does not know that they will ever be used, except in the case of an emergency. Stevens stated that the dimensional requirements need to be set by the design of this project, the setbacks are probably the most substantial ofthe requirements, with the triplex building we can not have a side yard setback because .there is a unit in the middle, all of the other units have a 5' total or zero because it is a duplex and has zero on one side which means it has to have at least 5' on the other side, the minimum lot size is taken directly off the lot plan, they are 2000 s.f. for the townhouse unit, 5850 s.f. for the single-family detached units, the FARis set for .5: 1 for single-family detached and .75:1 for attached, that is a little higher than the square footage right now but the building envelopes provide limited space for expansion room on these homes, so we have asked for an FAR that will accommodate that expansion, the D.B.C code requires a legal egress window in any basement space and that now adds to s.f., if the basement is finished out it will get into light and ventilation that may require another window that will count . towards FAR, they want to provide for the potential expansion. Stevens said the 14 ".....". PLANNING & ZOo .tNG COMMISSION .-., .JUL Y 2. 1996 building height has been set at 28', 25' works for this if needed, the project fits in this site and he does not see any weak links in the design, taking into account the existing vegetation, grading, and physical restraints and we have still maintained the design integrity of what they started out to do. Blaich asked what the surface of the parking lot and drive'YVays will be. Stevens responded they will be asphalt. Blaich asked what the promenade will be. Stevens said it may be concrete and along side that a grass paving system will have to be used. . Blaich said if it is concrete it could be stained to look more natural. Blaich suggested that the emergency parking behind the smalL building also be the grass paving. Garton said she has trouble with the traffic studies that say the applicant only has to pay $5000 for the impacts generated by this project for the intersection at Maroon Creek and Castle Creek road. Hammond responded that with respect to the intersection at CastleIMaroon and Highway 82 is effectively funded through the Highlands and Moore projects, in process through Pitkin County, there is 1.3 million dollars, between the two projects available for the improvements of that intersection and other elements of their road plan in that area. Hammond said they are not contributing more toward that intersection condition what they are contributing toward is the lower portion of Castle Creek road from the hospital entry down to the intersection with Maroon Creed road. Garton said that at the worksession this Commission said that because we are asking Hines and the Moore property to contribute to this intersection that the city contribute to what is going on at that intersection, she feels the city has to pay into that, it is adding a community to the Castle Creek valley and $5000 is too low. Hunt asked if anyone had walked from the bus stop up to this site, is there any idea what sort of grade it is, he would like to know how practical that is going to be and how far is the farthest unit from the parking. Smith responded that it is approximately 220'. Hunt said that is approximately one city block, that can be a long walk if your carrying a full bag of groceries, he asked how they are dealing with the ADA regulations on handicapped access. Stevens said they would set up the two closest spaces and two closest units as ADA accessible units. 15 r-, PLANNING & ZL,dNG COMMISSION ..-., .JUL Y 2, 1996 PUBLIC COMMENTS Maxine Jacobs, public, Manager of Castle Ridge stated that she turned in l;lletter concerning the "precarious" boulders behind the 700 building, she said if they do come down they will hit the building. Stevens responded that from a practical standpoint they can probably move a boulder that size, he is worried about accessing it, they can not access it from below and if we come in from the top we will have to take out a swab of scrub oak and even then he does not know if the arm of the machinery will reach the boulder, he did say they will explore the area and respond to the letter. Bill Brumworth, public, manages Mountain Oaks across the street from Castle Ridge said that his concerns are the bus stop and he appreciates how the cooperative the city has been about that, he would like to stress that he thinks it should be a separate one way bus lane to get the bus off the road, school buses use the same turn and the radii is not sufficient for the bus to get off the road leaving the tail of the bus sticking out into the road and if the school bus comes behind it is in the road, he thinks there should be some type of cross walk coming across from the health and human services building to get people safely to the bus stop, he said speeding traffic is the biggest issue, we now have posted speed limit signs of25 m.p.h. and they are useless, they do nothing to slow people down. Brurnworth stated that he thinks eventually the road will need a dip or speed bump, the current speed limit of25 m.p,h. is still too fast and he questions whether 20 is still 5 m.p.h. too fast. Brumworth said that this area is a Wildlife zone and dogs are not allowed, he is in the position of having to keep dogs out of the complex and not allow tenants to bring dogs on the property, at some point, when Twin Ridge was built dogs were allowed in the single-family homes in a fenced yard or on a leash at all times, that has not worked at all, he is leery of the idea of having dogs up the street, he also asked that dogs of construction workers be addressed. Brumworth also stated that he would like to encourage the city to line up the construction projects to have the least amount of impact on the neighbors, wouldn't it be better to get the road finished instead of coming back after the houses are built, he is concerned because he has a lot of emergency room nurses and others that sleep during the day. Hauter stated that the bus stop is in the county and he will ask that the City Engineer work with the county on every concern that Mr. Brumworth mentioned. 16 ""'" fLANNING & ZO"lNG COMMISSION ""'" JULY 2,1996 Brumworth added that he has been trying to get that bus stop cleaned up for a long time, he has controlled the thistle on that property and maintained the dead trees, it always has trash around and he asked that the city support cleaning it up. Georgia Hansen, public asked that the people who live in the townhomes at Twin Ridge be considered or involved in the placement oflighting, because they are eye . level on the second floor of their units, all of those lights will be shining directly in the bedroom windows. Hauter responded that they have agreed to have subdued lighting. Hansen is also concerned about the construction, she said she knew they would be impacted but if they could be impacted for as little time as possible it would be nice, she is a realist and knows they have to be built, she asked that they all be built at the same time. Hauter responded thatthey will be . phased o\:"er approximately two years. Hansen agreed with Garton that the intersection is untenable, this project will come on-line before Hines or Moore, the intersection needs improvements and Highlands group has offered to go ahead and do them but the political process is going to disallow that the money be spent on improvements at the intersection, depending on what happens, that 1.3 million could sit there for 1 0 years while they decide whether they want to spend it on trains or intersection improvements. Garton asked how practical it will be to go back in and do curb and gutter on such a narrow road when a community is living there. Hauter responded that the. concept is to pave the road and it has only been a suggestion to come back and do the curb and gutter. Adeh said that he is trying to phase this because winter will be here soon and construction costs will double and even triple in cost. Hunt said that he likes the idea of a double overlay, (paving the road, building the houses and coming back with a new layer of road and curb and gutter) because running that much construction traffic for a year it will ruin the mat that is down. MOTION: Hunt moved to recommend approval ofthe Final SPA Development Plan, Amendment ofthe Aspen Water Treatment Plant SPA, Growth Management Exemption for Affordable Housing and Essential Public Facilities, Subdivision, 8040 Greenline Review, Conditional Use and Special Review for Parking, Open Space and Dimensional Requirements in the Public Zone District for the City of Aspen Water Treatment Plant Improvements and Affordable Housing Project, subject to the following conditions: 17 r-.. PLANNING & ZOhtNG COMMISSION .~ JULY 2,1996 1) All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council are considered conditions of approval, unless amended by other conditions. 2) The amended SPA Development Plan shall be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the amended SPA Development Plan within a period of 180 days following approval by the City Council shall render the PUD approval invalid and reconsideration and approval by the Commission and City Council will be required before the acceptance and recording, unless an extension or waiver is granted by the City Council for a showing of good cause. 3) A final stormwater drainage plan must be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any development permits. 4) The applicant shall sign Doolittle Road as 20 miles per hour, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5) The proposed pedestrian loop on the east side of Doolittle Road shall be approved by the Fire Marshall for emergency access purposes. 6) The final plat shall have signature blocks for all utilities. 7) The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts which may be formed for construction of right-of- way improvements in adjacent and neighborhood public rights-of-way. 8) The final SPA Plan must show, dimension, and number all parking for the development. 9) The applicant shall consult City Engineering for design considerations of development within public rights-of-way, Parks Department for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including 18 r-, PLANNING & Zth' ING COMMISSION ~ JlJL Y 2, 1996 landscaping, within the public right-of-way from City Streets Department. 10) Native vegetation to be retained shall be protected to the maximum extent practical, including the establishment of building envelopes outside of the existing oak scrub. Construction fencing shall be erected at the dripline around all protected vegetation adjacent to structures, trails or roads prior to the issuance of any excavation, grading, or building permits. Any exposed roots must be protected during construction per Parks Department direction. 11) Street light fixtures and locations shall be approved by the Community and shown on the Final SPA Plan. 12) Mud shall not be tracked onto City Streets during construction. 13) Prior to acceptance of financial assurances for the project, the cost estimates of improvements must be approved by the City Engineer. 14) A line extension agreement and appropriate fees will be required per Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Regulations. 15) Homeowners covenants must provide for snow removal on any sidewalks and trails approved through this development review. 16) Street names shall meet the approval of the City Engineering Department. 17) The single family home size variance is allowed for net livable area less that the 1,400 square feet. 18) The deed restrictions shall be 12 Resident Occupied units and 11 Category 4 units. 19 r-, PLANNING & Z('ldNG COMMISSION r-, .JULY 2,1996 19) The eventual trail alignment shall be staked for review by the Community Development Department, and shall avoid as much existing vegetation as practical. Snow removal on the trail shall be the responsibility of the homeowner's association. 20) Residents from adjacent residential neighborhoods should be included in the planning and design of the proposed park. The park should be adequately fenced or screened with vegetation to keep children from straying onto Doolittle Drive. The applicant shall submit a park design to the Parks Department for approval prior to the recording of a final SPA Plan. 21) A park development impact fee will be granted in exchange for the applicant's commitment to design and construct park development activities (grading, drainage, top soil, seeding and vegetation). 22) No fireplaces are approved for the development. 23) A fugitive dust plan shall be approved by Environmental Health prior to the issuance of any grading, excavation, utility, demolition, or building permits. 24) Financial guarantees for landscaping, revegetation, and public facilities improvements must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to the issuance of any development permits for the project. 25) The applicant shall submit pavement treatments for the crossing of Doolittle Drive for review and approval by the Engineering Department prior to the recording of a Final SPA Plan. 26) All construction shall be consistent with the Geotech report recommendations conducted by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 20 r-, PLANNING & Zdr~ LNG COMMISSION .~ .TUL Y 2. 1996 27) the applicant shall be required to present evidence to Council that the GMQS exemption and the associated mitigation waivers are appropriate and warranted. 28) the concrete paths shall be colored to reflect a more natural appearance. 29) the applicant shall confirm that the proposed road impact mitigation is consistent with the relative impact of the project on the Castle Creek, Maroon Creek and Highway 82 intersection. 30) the applicant shall address the rocks located above Castle Ridge apartments and; 31) the applicant will continue working with RFTA and the County to make improvements to the bus stop at Doolittle and Castle Creek Road. Seconded by Blaich. All in favor, motion carries. Buettow stepped down. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: Aspen Mountain PUD Michaelson.said this is a continued public hearing, on June 24th we went up and did some field work at that point geotechnical issues were paramount to P&Z tabling the project, the geotech report has been received and sent to the State Geologist for their comments, Staff suggests that the application be tabled to a special meeting on July 23, 1996. Michaelson noted that the application is in compliance with the PUD standards, in terms of FAR, Open Space, Height, a zone text amendment is being proposed as part of this application, a trail easement is an issue because; 1) building envelopes have been proposed on it and; 2) it does not go anywhere, Parks has indicated that they would like a portion of the easement to be retained, we looked at working with the Ski Company to locate the easement on a secondary catwalk that is right above the property line it runs on top of the cribbing that is below the water tower, it continues along the ridge and ideally dropping as close to the Gondola as possible, or at least on the other side of town, Parks was willing to entertain this because they have some links along Shadow 21 TO: CC: FROM: RE: DATE: ~, ;.-\ ~ MEMORANDUM Chuck Roth Nick Adeh Stan Clauson \ If ^ David HauO' \ SPA DevelQpment Plan for Affordable Housin~ Proiect Reference Ordinance NO. 23, series of 1996 January 10, 1997 /~-------- I have been given the official date the amended SPA Development Plan needs to be recorded from Kathy Strickland in the City Clerks office as follows: January 28, 1997. This above has been confirmed by John Worcester, City Attorney. Council has a regularly scheduled meeting on January 27, 1997 and if need be we can ask for an extension at that time. thanks... , , r"'"', OlZ-l CYuJP\L. Ie ;::\ L(f, r". January 23, 1997 Stan Clauson Community Development Director City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81601 . THE CITY OF ASPEN Re; p.,.\,?~O\j't.D Insubstantial ~endrnerit to the ~inal Plat , ' ?,.l\ \SSl ' Reference Ordmance No. 23 (Senes of 1996) . J~~ .l:.C\Otl . Water Treatment Plant Improvements & Affordahle HOl1sin~ &C~~\ Oltl , . .., \Ji'J,'J,IJ\l.1I el~ O'i f>S?t.~ , Dear Stan: The purpose of this letter is to submit to you for authorization several insubstantial amendments to'the development plan for above referenced Project. All of the changes are consistent with a condition or representation of the Project's original appr~val. . I. Reference Condition #11 ' Change the condition to require that the street light fixtures and locations. shall be approved prior to the recording of the SPA Plan; to require that the street light fixtures and locations shall be submitted to COmrllunity Development for approval prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any units' within the Project. 2. Reference Condition #16. '. . ' The street names shall be submitted to the City Council for approval prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any units within the Project. 3. Reference Condition #20 . . Change the condition to require that the park design shall be submitted to the Parks Department for approval prior to the recording ofthe SPA Plan; to reqUire thatthe , park design and trail alignment shall be submitted to the Parks Department for approval prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any units within the Project. 4. Reference Condition #25 , Change the condition to require that pavement treatments for the crossing of Doolittle Drive shall be submitted for review IIDd approval by the .Engineering Department approval prior to the recording of the SPA Plan; to require that the 130 SOllTH GALENA STREET. ASPEN, COLORAO,? 81611 : PHONE 303.920.5000 . FAX 303.920.5197 Printcdon""1cledpap<r ~r ~r~r ~ F1 I"""'-. I"""'-. pavement treatments forthe crossing of Doolittle Drive shall be submitted for r~view and approval by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any units with~n the Project. 5. Reference Condition #31 Change the condition to require that the applicant shall submit proposed landscaping screening or other form of buff~ring between Doolittle Drive and the single-family units for approval prior to the recording of the SPA Plan; to require that the applic,ant shall submit proposed landscaping screening or other form of _ .buffering between Doolittle Drive and the singlecfamily units for approval prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any units within the Project. 6. Reference Condition #32 . Change the condition to require that the applicarit shall revise the elevations for the single family homes on the west side of Doolittle Drive to achieve compliance with Ordinance 30 for approval prior to the recording.of the SPA Plan; to require that the applicant shall revise the elevations for the single family homes on the west side of Doolittle Drive to achieve compliance with Ordinance 30 for approval prior to issuance of a Building Permit for any single family unit withinthe Project. 7. The location of the new 4,200 s.f. Storage Building; Storage Bins and Yard Area has been moved and located approximately 100 ft. north of the originally proposed site to minimize disturbance of the native Gamble Oaks. The boundary property line bordering the westerly edge of the single family housing' sites will be established subsequent to the determination, relocation arid completion of the Meadowood Ditch. The final boundary shall be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk arid Recorder and shall be binding upon the property prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for any single unit within the Project. The exact location of the following easements and property monuments can not be fixed at this time. The final depiction shall be recorded under a separate plat amendment that shall be filed prior to the issuance of a building permit for any single unit within the Project. . Reference item #8 above regarding the final property line pending relocation and completion of the Meadowood Ditch relocation. . It The 12 foot wide easement bordering the westerly edge of the single family housing sites indicated on the Final Plat as' a "drainage easement" shall becorne a noncexclusive general easement. . A 20 foot wide Utility easement shall be located equally between Lots 18 & 19. .1"""\ ,..-,. . . The exact location of the 20 foot Wide Utility easement across the Common Area needs to be confirmed. The as-built location of the existing 24" DIP transmission line shall be verified during the site preparation work. The easement shall be established at 10 foot on each side of centerline of the existing pipe. . The exact location of all utiJityeasements shall be confirmed prior to construction. This includes areas that may that may need to be reserved for snow storage, The recordation of the development plan requires your authorization of all insubstantial amc::ndments. Please let me know if the above meets with your.approval. . ~nQr~ly, ~ APPROVED. David Hauter, Asset Manager City of Aspen JAM 2 4 1997 COMMUt-l\11" DE\'cLOPM8'lT OIR"C1OR e\1Y Or I\SpEN . c.c. Chuck Roth ~ r-, .~ ~ City of Aspen Affordable Housing Project Interview Wednesday, January 29, 1997 3:00 pm . Design/Build Team Architects - Baker Fallin Associates, Inc., John Baker ~..M" Contractor - Rudd Construction, Inc., Jim Kehoe nt~~ V- ( VIA 0. X JJ II--vj!1/\.L- I / QAQC Manager (Owner's Rep) - John Keleher Engineering Consultants - Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc., Jay Hammond Geotechnical Engineering Consultant - Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Landscape Architect - Landscape Workshop, Inc., Jim Pitts Green Design Consultant - What's Working, David Johnston . Green Design Plan . Preliminary Management Plan ~:. '. " .\ ' .; ,,,l. ',I, ,,,,~=:.." '", ~ ,'" PRO POS A:(:L,: 71: ~'\\'& _ ~ _" ,~. W"'~ . & ~ ~. ". ~'<$: -'=~- ;!,~~'''' f:."-'I/f- '~::;,,->~*n' wa~;;.~~ ~ 4-~g~i.~ ill A . C p- R-(<' ':"'-" <'F1< ~~. _ .. 'l~ .c~; ""w." - . *" ~* ,'<., ' l. ."""" '<~. '. 4 '<'>~'*' 5 y%~,;~ ~ a !l<~~, 1'...$' ~ " l l::;;Jlli! Ii d' r ,"'" li"1i''''''If'i'''1! rr "" t.:I",,\,. ffi"'. ~ % kl1.A'?~":'~;;.'~~%l'.J~~.~.bf %Ai%l>i> ;,#Uili&, ~w>t.$~.""'. !$; ~l m t,,;.{>,~ ._./ r-, '-". Preliminary Management Plan February 17 Part I - Contract Approval, Notice to Proceed . Review & Analysis . Value Engineering . Green Design . Test holes . Foundation Design March 3 Submit scope of work, budget, schedule . Preliminary Design Development March 24 Submit for City Council Approval. . Preliminary Design Documents . Maximum Construction Cost . Itemized Cost of Labor & Materials . Construction Schedule ,,: ., . j .. \.i ,'. .~... ., _,.,00'" . ~'! , ./ r-, ."". March 28 Part 2 - Contract Approval, Notice to Proceed Submit for Excavation Permit . Begin final drawings & specs Apri/14 Submit for Footing & Foundation Permit April 21 Submit final budget & schedule Begin footing excavation April 28 Submit Units 5 - 9 for Building Permit May 12 Submit Units 10 - 13 for Building Permit May 26 Submit Units 1 - 4 & 14 - 17 for Building Permit June 16 June 30 Subm" Units 18, 19 & 22 for Building permit) Submit Units 20 & 21 for Building Permit 5.;:' r}o/lll~ July 14 Submit Emergency Response Building, Parking, Storage & Misc. Structures for Building Permit .j .' . , . .- ~ , , r-, ~, December 1 Substantial Completion Spring '98 Landscaping -', ., I ] , i ! .J r-. ~Stan Clauson, 11:L AM ."""'" 2/4/97 -, Hous~ng ProJ, c X-Sender: stanc@comdev.aspen.co.us Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 11:06:54 -0700 To: juliew@aspen.co.us From: Stan Clauson <stanc@comdev.aspen.co.us> Subject: Housing Project FYI. Can you please assign this to someone. Tha.nks, Stan >X-Sender: davidh@commons >Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 11:13:17 -0700 >To: stanc@aspen.co.us >From: David Hauter <davidh@aspen.co.us> >Subject: Housing project > >Regarding Ordinance 30 a.nd other planning related issues would you assign a >staff member to work with myself and the Design/Build Team (DBT). on the >design standards for this Project. Another important issue is the request >from prospective owners that all units have a basement. Our planning >documents indicate basements under some but not all of the units. > >In order to meet the schedule we must submit for approval, compliance and or >appeal for exemptions ASAP. ..thanks > >P.S. Rick Magill has indicated that he would like to facilitate the >Doolittle Park Design process. We must have an approved Park Design and >Trail Alignment prior to issuance of any CO. > > > Thanks very much, Stan Clauson Community Development Director ~~nted tor Ju!~e Ann Woods <Ju!~eW@aspen.co.us> 1 r-. Stan Clauson, 08:~ AM 2/6/97 1""""\ -" Re: Housing. ,.)Ject X-Sender: stanc@comdev.aspen.co.us Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 08:46:43 ~0700 To: Julie Ann Woods <juliew@aspen.co.us> From: Stan Clauson <stanc@comdev.aspen.co.us> Subject: Re: Housing Project No conflict of interest. You're on. Stan At 01:53 PM 02.05.1997 -0700, you wrote: >Stan- - >It makes a lot of sense fo~me to handle this, since I have a vested >interest and will likely be attending meetings as an owner. However, do you >think that there may be a perceived conflict of interest on my behalf? If >so, I think Chris B should probalby hmnadle the case. Please let me know >what you think. Julie Ann. > >At 11:06 AM 2/4/97 -0700, you wrote: >>FYI. Can you please assign this to someone. >>Thanks, >> >>Stan >> >> >> >>>X-Sender: davidh@commons >>>Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 11:13:17 -0700 >>>To: stanc@aspen.co.us >>>From: David Hauter <davidh@aspen.co.us> >>>Subject: Housing Project >>> >>>Regarding Ordinance 30 and other planning related issues would you assign a >>>staff member to work with myself and the Design/Build Team (DBT) on the >>>design standards for this Project. Another important issue is the request >>>from prospective owners that all units have a basement. Our planning >>>documents indicate basements under some but not all of the units. >>> >>>In order to meet the schedule we must submit for approval, compliance and or >>>appeal for exemptions ASAP...thanks >>> >>>P.S. Rick Magill has indicated that he would like to facilitate the >>>Doolittle Park Design process. We must have an approved Park Design and >>>Trail Alignment prior to issuance of any CO. >>> >>> >>> >>Thanks very much, >>Stan Clauson >>Community Development Director >> IPr1nted for Ju11e Ann Woods <Ju11eW@aspen.co.us> 1 ~ "-,,, Dav1d Hauter, 11:~ AM 2/18/97 , Hous1ng Proj~ .C X-Sender: davidh@commons Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 11:21:44 -0700 To: juliew@aspen.co.us From: David Hauter <davidh@aspen.co.us> Subject: Housing Project ***Hi: I have 2 requests... 1. How are your doing on your floor plan? 2. I would like you to look into what issues are going to come up . regarding the addition of basements under all residences? We only ask approval for basements under about half the units in our Land Use Application. We should have included basements (lower floors) under all.. .you can not do it later and the building envelops are so small! My hope is that the addition of the basements is an change that will require approval by Comm. Dev. but not an appearance before the P&Z. If we do have to go back to the P&Z then we need to schedule this ASAP. Thanks for your assistance. David IPr1nted tor JuL1e Ann Woods <Ju11eW@aspen.co.us> 1 !..". 1'*'\ ,~ ~Stephen Kan1pe, 08._6 AM 2/20/97 ,waterplace ~us1ng meet1ng X-Sender: stephenk@comdev.aspen.co.us Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 08:56:15 -0700 To: juliew@aspen.co.us, sarat@aspen,co.us, nicka@aspen.co.us, davidha@aspen.co.us, larryd@aspen.co.us From: Stephen Kanipe <stephenk@comdev.aspen.co.us> Subject: waterplace housing meeting Cc: stanc@aspen.co.us X-Attachments: C:\HOME\STEPHENK\ASPEN\H20PLCE1.DOC; Folks, Thanks, Please review the attached memo. Pass along to anyone I missed. Stephen Attachment Converted: C:\HOME\JULIEW\INATTACH\H20PLCE1.doc IPr1nted tor Ju11e Ann Woods <Ju11eW@aspen.co.us> 1 -'" " r-, f"""" memorandum Notes on Waterplace Housing meeting Date; 18 feb 97 Attendees: Jim Kehoe, John Baker, John Keleher, Jim Austin, David Hauter, Stephen Kanipe John Baker began by stating the propose of our being together was to develop strategy to "gain days" on the permit and approval process as the construction schedule is ambitious. The first need is for approval to begin site work including utility installation, rough grading and basement excavation, We agreed that site drainage and utility work would be reviewed and permitted by Engineering. A Foundation permit will be issued when stamped basement structural plans, floor plans and elevations have been approved by our referral departnJents and plan reviewed. It is understood that DepartnJent policy allows affordable housing projects a reasonable priority in the review process, The architects plan to have the foundation permit submittal ready by 3/4. Hauter wants to add exterior storage adjacent to the buildings. City Council approval is expected 3/28, The site and utility work is scheduled for 4/1 5 and that is the date Engineering should agree on for approved site drainage and utility work to begin. r-, ~ Single Family 4/3/97 \5J~~~~ I Additional Proposed Single Family Residences: Original Now Difference Cost I . Lot 18: Finished Living I 1,590 2264 674 $28,308 2520 Unfinished Living 690 256 (434) $0 Enclosed s.f. Garage 484 616 132 $5,544 Porches i 40 50 10 $250 Decks , 150 150 0 $0 Patios 0 0 0 $0 i $34,102 Lot 19: Finished Living(Add Third Floor) 1,590 2316 726 $61,710 3073 Unfinished Living 690 757 67 $2,814 Enclosed s.f. Garage I 484 550 66 $2,772 Porches I 40 40 50 $1,250 Decks 150 150 0 $0 Patios I 0 0 0 $0 , Lot 20: Finished Living 1,092 1352 260 $22,100 2158 Unfinished Living(Add Lower Level) 0 806 806 $33,852 Enclosed s.f. Garage i 400 484 84 $3,528 Porches 80 80 0 $0 Decks 450 450 0 $0 Patios 1 72 100 28 $140 i $59,620 I . Lot 21: Finished Living 1,450 1872 422 $17.724 2637 Unfinished Living(Add Lower Level) 0 765 765 $32,130 Enclosed s.f. Garage 400 550 150 $6,300 Porches 100 75 0 $0 Decks 0 50 0 $0 Patios 144 400 . 256 $1,280 $57,434 .. Lot 22: Finished Living I 1,590 2493 903 $37,926 , 2493 Unfinished Living(Add Lower Level) 690 0 (690) $0 Enclosed s.f. Garage 484 550 66 $2,772 Porches 40 50 10 $250. Decks 150 150 0 $0 . Patios 0 0 0 $0 , $40,948 I . Estimated Additional Costs per Current D!,sign Requests ; $260,650 I I I i I I. . . ". ~. ~~~~ Page 1 r... dav1dh, ~O:22 AM 6/~f97 -, Re: Water P~ace -, To: davidh From: Sara Thomas <sarat@comdev.aspen.co.us> Subj~ct: Re: Water Place Cc: Bcc: X-Attachments: David - FYI. Sara >X-Sender: cindyc@commons.aspen.co.us >Date: Fri, 06 Jun 1997 09:22:06. -0600. >To: Sara Thomas <sarat@comdev.aspen.co.us> >From: Cindy Christensen <cindyc@aspen.co.us> >Subject: Re: Water Place > >Sara: CO >on these units. We will need the final plat of the units recording >information for the deed restriction before we can record, so this can wait >to close to co. >restrictions. of >their 10% maximum capital improvements. Also, . >prior to .CO, I will want to. know so that if the City filed their own deed >restriction it was reviewed by us as they did one for the Cemetery Lane >homes and it is screwed up in some really important areas. THANKS!!!! We just need to be SURE that a deed restriction is filed prior to Adding additional bedrooms will not affect the category Any cost of finishing a basement will be utilized as part Any questions, let me know. > >Cindy > >At 11:53 AM 6/5/97 -0600, you wrote: >>Water Place has submitted their building permit appliation for the duplexes >>and triplex. Do you have any deed restriction matters that need to be >>resolved before the permits are issued? Also, ...the plans came through >>showing unfinished basements. If bedrooms are eventually added to these >>units, will that affect their Category restrictions? Thanks - Sara >> >> >> > > > !pr1ntea tor Sara Thomas <sarat@c1.aspen.co.us> ~ r-. Dav1d Hauter, ~~:32 ...<< 8/7/97 -., -, HQUS1ng proJec 1 X-Sender: davidh@commons.ci.aspen.co.us Date: Thu, 07 Aug ~997 ~~:32:25 -0600 To: j~liew@ci.aspen.co.us From: David Hauter <davidh@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Housing Project Cc: johnw@ci.aspen.co.us Julie: Do you foresee any problems with elimination of the property line between the duplex units? We need do this because the type of construction required by code for exterior walls on property lines is too restrictive. It effects the architecture because it prevents roof overhangs and window openings on a property line. It would mean that the homeowners of the attached units would share common land. There would be no change to the approved site plan; the location of the units is not changing; and sharing the land poses no significant legal problems. We have indicated property lines between the attached units on our land use application, however, we can amend this at the time of recording the amended final plat. IPrJ.nted tor JU~1e Ann woods <Ju~J.eW@c1. aspen. co .us> ~ . .,..., .,..." dav~dh, 05:~4 PM 8/~~/97 , Water P~ace To: davidh From: Sara Thomas <sarat@ci.aspen.co.us> Subj~ci:: Water Place . .. Cc: juliew Bcc: X-Attachments: David - I just reviewed the permits for Lot 18 at Water Place housing. I have noted on the permit that an amended plat will be required prior to c.o. With the reconfigurations of the driveways for the single family lots, it looks like the recorded site plan and the sheets that show the building elevations will have to be amended. It would probably be best to amend the plat after permits have been issued for all the single family lots, just in case there are any other changes. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks ~ Sara IPr~nted :tor Sara Thoma.s <sarat(!llc~.aspen.co.us> ~ r-, dav1dh, 05:25 PM 6/26/97 , Water Place '-'. To: davidh From: Sara Thomas <sarat@ci.aspen.co.us> Subj~ct: Water Place Cc: stanc,juliew Bee: X-Attachments: David - I just signed the C.O. for the storage facility at the water treatment plant. please remember to show the as-built location of this facility when you amend the plat for the project. Thanks - Sara iPr1nted ~or sara Thomas <sarat@c1.aspen.co.us> 1 / r-, MEMORANDUM .~ ./ TO: FROM: RE: DATE: October 31, 1997 On behalf of the City of Aspen, David Hauter has applied for an amendment to the approved PUD for the Water Place Housing Project. The amendment to construct three garage structures in place of the approved carports meets the criteria for an insubstantial amendment, as set forth in Section 26.84.080, and may be approved by the Community Development Director. As shown on the attached plans, three garage structures are proposed to house a total of 17 autos. Although there is no final plat, draft plat, or site improvement survey to establish the exact location of the proposed improvements on site and there is not a professional surveyor monitoring the placement of the improvements during constructiol!, there does not appear to be any readily apparent land use issues with the. placement of these structures. Also included in the attached plans are the proposed elevations detailing the materials to be used. The first set of elevations for these garages presented to staff incorporated tmtinished corrugated metal throughout. Staff suggested incorporating a wooden board and b:;tten finish, to complement the aesthetics of the housing strucrures, some additional trim details, and possibly a corrugated metal wainscot, from the ground to 3 or 4 feet above ground, of to protect the building against snow and water damage and to break-up the box-like appearance. The applicant then submitted a revised perspective, attached. that addressed staff's concerns. The materials proposed, however, should be interchanged in their location so that the board and batten tinish is above the corrugated metal finish. Staff suggests making this a condition of approval. This requested modification has been noted on the perspective drawing. Staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve this insubstantial PUD amendment with one condition: -- The materials shown on the attached .perspeClive shall be interchanged so that the corrugated metal finish is app lied to the bottom section of the structure and the board and batten fmish is applied above as noted. Approved: y \ ~V\t~ date:Z;{Jc-r'7.-:r-: Bob Nevins, Long Range Planner, for Stan Clausol!, Community Development Director Attached: "S ite Plan" "Garage Plan and Section" "Garage Elevations" "Perspective" -~-~------------ '--...,. j,.....- VJ 6,-, J.A. . MemO~m ~ fklJ: .O~ -- .- DATE: March 26, 1997 TO: . Stan Clauson, Community Development Director FROM: Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director RE: Insubstantial Amendment to Approved PUD- Waterplace Housing cc: Sara Thomas. Vicki Monge . Attached is an application requesting an insubstantial Amendment to an approved PUD for the Waterplace Housing project located near the water plant. The applicant, represented by David Hauter, the City's Asset Manager, is requeSling that each of the units ( 17 townhouses and 5 single family) be modified in order to allow basements to be placed under each of the units. When the project was reviewed, basements were not indicated on the plans. Because the units are fairly small, the city believes that a full basement for each unit is necessary to ensure adequate storage for employees. There is no change to the footprint of the buildings, and basements do not add to the F /I.R.. Under Section 26.84.080, "An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may. be authorized by the Community Development Director." The code then goes on to describe those items that are NOT considered an insubstantial amendment. This proposal does notfall into any of those criteria, therefore it is eligible for an insubstantial amendment through you as the Director. Staff recommends that the Community Development Director approve this insubstantial amendment to the PUD, without conditions. ,If you agree with this recommendation, please sign here, and I'll forward a copy to the applicant as ~1I as the building dep . an ,zoning administrator. ocO\}'Ci.J \ p.,.? ,\T' " .. ,,~c;1 . \.~ "z \;. ,..FoI' ~I\ _~\IJr. . D I J,.ilro.... Irector ofCommUll1ty eve opme~,,-\.o' ,.c." vo~w.IJ\\Ii't ~i't C'i ~S?I':.\\ ",}\ ,., t' '\ stanc, 03:06 PM 1/13/96 , Waterplace To: stanc From: Sara Thomas <sarat@ci.aspen.co.us> Subject: Waterplace Cc: juliew Bcc:' X-Attachments: The following are items that need to be taken care of prior to C .'0. for Waterplace: 1. All units to be deed restricted through the housing office. 2. Tree mitigation to be resolved with the Parks Dept. 3. The plat needs to be amended to show the individual property lines. The amended plat needs to reflect that, with the multi family structures,each property contain the entire structure including lightwells, overhangs, etc. ' 4. The recorded drawings of the SPA need to be amended to reflect the revised. locations and elevations of the single family structures, as well as .the revised location of water plant facility structures, i.e. the storage building and the administrative office building. In addition, the site plan needs to accurately reflect the changes made to the garage buildings. 5. The SPA drawings need to be amended to reflect the additions of the basements to the residential units. In addition, the approving ordinance (#23-1996) was amended so that a number of conditions of approval would take place prior to C.O. I am placing a copy of the Ordinance and Amendment in your box. I am also placing copies of e-mails that I sent to David Hauter that let him know of some of the items that we would be looking for prior to C.O. Thanks - Sara IPr1nted for Sara Thomas <sarat@c1.aspen.co.us> 1 - f'. ,-.., WA TERPLACE HOUSING CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN, COLORADO THE DESIGN / BUILD TEAM OF RUDD CONSTRUCTION, INC. AND BAKER I FALLIN ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS A PRESENTATION OF THE PURPOSE, GOALS, METHODS, AND GENERAL SCOPE OF THE WORK AS DEVELOPED BY THE DESIGN I BUILD TEAM IN AN EFFORT TO CREATE AN ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY AND ENERGY EFFICIENT HOUSING PROJECT FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF ASPEN "-..,,. ,-. 1.0 General 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this Basis of Design Report is to establish the scope of the work, establish a not to exceed price for fees and construction, and establish a schedule for the construction of the Waterplace Housing Project. This report will establish and identify the products and methods to be employed in the construction of the Waterplace Housing Project. The proposed products and methods are a result of the research and value engineering of the Design/Build Team during the term of the Part One agreement, Preliminary Design and Development. In our research we have found environmentally friendly or "green" construction is a very common sense approach to the environmental concems of today. New products are emerging every day and it has been our job to focus on the cost and desirability of these products in the Waterplace Housing Project. The individual products and methods will be grouped by CSI Specifications divisions as they will appear in the final Construction Documents. 1.2 Background The Design / Build Team of Rudd Construction, Inc. and Baker / Fallin Architects was retained by the City of Aspen to complete the Part One of the Design/Build contract for the Waterplace Housing Project in February of 1997. Using the approved Land Use Planning documents as prepared by Gibson/Reno Architects and Schmeuser Gordon Myer, Engineers in 1996, the Design/Build Team has further developed preliminary documents for construction under the approved outline. The given location for Waterplace Housing is, itself, a sensitive area and proper consideration has been given to the maintaining of the beauty of the site under the requirements of the City of Aspen. Consideration of climate and conditions of the area has been a criteria for the selection of the building products, building methods, and scheduling of the Project. 1.3 References Detailed analysis of products to become a part of the construction are listed in a volume produced by 'What's Working' a group dedicated to environmentally friendly construction and employed by the Design/Build Team as consultants. Other data available for reference include the Land Planning maps used in the original submission for Land Use Approval, and geotechnical reports prepared at that time. I""'" "'-, 2.0 Methodology of the Design/Build Effort 2.1 General The scope of the Part Two Agreement includes design and construction of the Waterplace Housing Project. The design and construction of the project will continue with the same personel that have been key in the Part One agreement. 2.2 Detailed Design The design effort will include preparation of drawings and specifications in sufficient detail to obtain building permits and to carry out the construction. During the term of the Part One agreement certain modifications have been made to the attached units to better utilize space and to accomodate access to basements which were added to fourteen of the seventeen units. It should be noted here that in an effort to accelerate the schedule the Design/Build Team has met with the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department and an agreement has been reached whereby foundation design will be submitted at the earliest possible date. Considering the scope of the project and the length of the building season this is of great advantage to the project as a whole. Based upon the preliminary design used in the Land Use Application, selection of subcontractors has been in process during the term of the Part One agreement. The selected subcontractors will be open to the review of the City. The project, as a whore, will be 'open book' and review of costs by the City will be welcomed. All cost accounting will be performed by Rudd Construction and each Payment Request will be accompanied by a Billing Worksheet itemizing each invoice. 2.3 Construction Once construction begins, the Design/Build team will provide full-time on-site supervision of the work. A fully equipped site office will be established. With commencement of above ground construction a second supervisor will be assigned to the job. The design/build team's approach to the project is to divide the single family residences from the attached residences. The attached residences will be the first priority for construction. The areas adjacent to the attached units will provide for adequate parking for construction personel and staging area for construction of all units. During construction of the Waterplace Housing units we realize that other construction projects involving water plant improvements will be in progress and that it will be necessary to establish procedures that will allow for all work to progress smoothly. ".- .~ SCOPE OF THE WORK General The scope of this project is to include the following items as depicted on the drawings prepared by Gibson-Reno Architects along with modifications made during the term of the Preliminary Design Development. The most notable of those modifications is the addition of basement space to fourteen (14) ofthe seventeen (17) attached homes. Other changes include, but are not limited to the following: -Substitution of asphalt for concrete on the promenade and walkways to each of the attached homes. This substitution was made for reasons of cost mainly and we consider asphalt to be more forgiving in our freeze/ thaw conditions. -Substitution of architectural fiberglass shingles for corrugated metal roofs on several buildings. -Note: None of the infrastructure deleted from the Gould Construction contract is included in the Scope of Work of the Design/Build Team. DIVISION 1 100 - General Expense The scope of work for this division includes maintaining a temporary office at the site of the work manned by a field superintendent and equipped with computer, fax machine, and telephone; temporary power and sanitary facilities; weather protection of new construction and snow removal; trash removal, general clean-up and final clean-up; General Expense also includes costs of payment and performance bonding: 2-year maintenance bond; Professional Builders Liability Insurance and the use of on-site general construction equipment. ,-.., ,-.., DIVISION 200 200 - Excavation / Backfill/ Utilities -Clear and grub and remove from site all waste materials -Excavation for each building. 17 multi-family units, and 5 single family units. Basement depth excavation for all multi-family units except for the 'H' units. Includes footer and slab prep for Van pick up, mail station, and two recycle bins. -Installation of underdrain system at perimeters of each building. -Backfill and compaction of backfill material at all foundations -Water service from curb stops at lot lines provided by others to inside foundation -Sewer service from stubs at lot lines provided by others. -Trenching, padding and backfilling for shallow utilities; electric, phone, and cable in same ditch from main service locations as provided by others. -Trenching, padding, and backfilling for gas service. Service lines by KN Energy. 210 - Site Concrete / Paving / Drivesl Sidewalk -Clear and grub and remove from site all waste material -Prep 16' wide promenade for installation of concrete walkway -Prep all indicated parking areas for asphalt -Prep all driveways to single family homes for asphalt -Prep all sidewalks to individual units in multi-family area -Dig and backfill for pads and tubes at covered storage units -Dig and backfill for various accessory buildings as shown on Plan view -Install curb and gutter and gutter pan as shown on site plan -Apply and compact 3" hot bituminous pavement on roads, parking area, promenade and walkways to individual units 220 - Landscaping -Provide rough grade only with on site materials as per Schmeuser Gordon Meyer Grading and Drainage plan -Actual landscaping, irrigation, and retaining structures will be by others, or, will be an additional cost to the contract price proposed by the Design/Build Team. r-. r\ DIVISION 3 300 - Structural Concrete Note: As a result of preliminary soil tests performed by H-P Geotech certain assumptions for spread footing and foundation wall pricing have been made. - All building footings to be 10" D. x 1 '-8" W. and of continuous pour. - All foundation walls are to be constructed of EPS Reward Wall system. This 'foam form' concrete forming system offers an R-Value of 33. 310 - Flat concrete - All interior slabs to be minimum 4" thick w/ #4 reinforcing bars at 18" o.c. DIVISION 4 N/A DIVISION 5 500 - Miscellaneous steel beams DIVISION 6 -- Wood and plastic 600 - Rough Framing The scope of this section of the work will include all rough carpentry framing. Wherever possible we have incorporated materials that are considered to be more environmentally sensitive. - Floor joists will be wood I beams, better known as T JI's, rather than solid wood - Floor sheeting will be 'oriented strand board' as made by Louisiana Pacific Company. OSB sheeting is made from farm grown trees and is bonded with adhesives containing no formaldehydes - Exterior walls will be of 6-1/2" R-Control panels offering an insulation factor of R-24 and a reduced on-site labor time. 610 - Carpentry Siding The scope of this section includes all exterior finishes such as fascia boards, soffit, siding, trim boards, and deck and rail products. Exterior finishes will follow as closely as pOSSible the elevations shown on the Gibson-Reno drawings. Cementitious siding will be used for the board and batten siding, the horizontal board siding and the soffit and fascia detailing. The advantages of this type of material is that it does not bum, and it holds paint or stain incredibly well resulting in very low maintenance. Other exterior finish products are corrugated, galvanized metal, cedar shingles, and where required solid wood beams and posts will be used. It is interesting to 1"'\ .'-". note that shingles are available in 'certified second growth' bundles. These shingles are made from farm grown trees rather than virgin timber. 620 - Finish Carpentry DIVISION 7 - Thermal and Moisture Protection 700 - Insulation - Walls - The structural building panels that will be used as the exterior wall construction are made of expanded polystyrene (EPS) insulation welded between stranded lumber facings. The tested R-value at 40 degrees Farenheit is R-24.33 and the integrity of the system allows for no R-value drift. Neither the EPS insulation nor the strand board contain any CFCs or formaldehyde. - Ceilings - Cellulose insulation, containing no formaldehyde bonding agents, will be used in the ceiling area to obtain an R-38 insulation value. Roof trusses have been designed to accomodate full thickness of the insulation all the way to the outside of the building wallis. 710 - Roofing system The scope of this section of the work includes the installation of 30 year architectural fiberglass shingles over a dry-in that includes Ice and Water Shield at building perimeters and valleys as required. 720 - Foundation waterproofing The scope of this section of the work includes the application of Rub R Wall waterproofing. This product has been formulated for application over foam form concrete forming systems. DIVISION 8 - Doors and Windows 800 - Doors - Exterior doors will be metal insulated with thermopane glazing - Interior doors will be six-panel simulated doors 810 - Windows - Windows will be all vinyl frame windows with Low-E glazing. DIVISION 9 - Finishes - The scope of this section of the work will inclUde all paints and stains used throughout the project. Care will be exercised in the selection of these products as they are the most likely to have an adverse effect on occupants of the buildings. ,,-.,. ".- DIVISION 10 - Mirrors and Accessories - The scope of this section of the work includes. mirrors at all bathroom vanities, medicine cabinets, and typical accessories such as towel bars, tissue holders, etc. DIVISION 11 - Appliances - The scope of this section of the work includes the supply and installation of kitchen appliances; i.e. refrigerator, dishwasher, range, and disposer. Clothes washers and dryers have not been included. DIVISION 12 - Cabinets and Countertops - The scope of this section of the work includes the supply and installation of all cabinetry and tops. The majority of factory made cabinets are constructed using particle board a product using a high amount of formaldehyde. With this in mind we have included in this section the use of cabinets made of solid wood. The countertops however will be manufactured with a particle board substrate. We have been advised that sealing of the underside of the countertops will eliminate any off-gasing of the formaldehydes and this will be accomplished on site just prior to installation. DIVISION 13 - Special Construction - The scope of this section of the work includes the building of the carport/storage buildings for use by attached home residents as well as the construction of the Van pick up, the Mail station, and two recycle bins. DIVISION 14 - Conveying Systems - N/A DIVISION 15 - Plumbing, Heating, and Ventilating 1500 - Plumbing - The scope of work of this section includes all rough and finish plumbing within the buildings and the supply of all plumbing fixtures. 1510 - Heating and Ventilation - The scope of work of this section includes a forced air heating system combined with a heat recovery ventilation (HRV) system. The HRV system will provide adequate inside/outside air changes to assure a more healthy inside environment as well as utilizing air that has already been heated in a more efficient circulating system to maintain a desired temperature at a lower cost. The HRV system will also provide ventilation in the warmer months to maintain a fresher atmosphere inside. 1520 - Fire Sprinkler System - Each unit will be equipped with a fully engineered Fire Supression System including and alarm system and outside indicator. ,-., ~ DIVISION 16 - Electrical 1600 - Security, Phone, Communications - The scope of work in this section will service wire to the units and pre-wire for phone system and cable TV. It will not include any provision for security systems other than that involved with the fire sprinkler system. 1610 - Electrical rough in and fixtures - The scope of work in this section will include electrical service wire installed in conduit from each unit to the transformer provided by others. It will also include all rough in wiring and finish wiring at each unit with fixtures to be supplied. All fixtures and lamps supplied will be energy saving devices. 1620 - Site lighting - No exterior site lighting is included under this contract. . ".- WATERPLACE HOUSING CONSTRUCTION COST - PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE RUDD CONSTRUCTION, INC. LOT #S LOT #1 LOT #2 LOT #3 LOT #4 LOT #5 LOT #6 LOT #7 LOT #6 LOT #9 LOT #10 LOT #11 LOT #12 LOT #13 LOT #14 LOT #15 LOT #16 LOT #17 LOT #18 LOT #19 LOT #20 LOT #21 LOT #22 STYLE H E D E G F G F H G G G F E D D H B B A C B ,~ Jf I~J "....,ol"--~ {p~ Ji lv-- fl.1-I:. 1'-- I ~'--tI'f"V' CONSTRUCTION COST $49,406.00 $88,704.00\ $105,986.00 $85,791.00 I $72,946.00 $82,722.00 , I $74,817.00 \' $84,706.00 $49,406.00 $77,454.00 $77,454.00 $77,160.00 / $76,209.00 / $105,986.00 I $85,791.00 i $105,986.00 i $49,406.0Q./ $154,856.00 $154,856.00 $119,476.00 $135,784.00 $154,856.00 CARPORTS 2 VAN STOP 1 RECYCLE BIN 2 MAIL STOP 1 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM .{Il-~'~ ~ ~, ~ ~I 'O'~ 'r)lt(,.V \...(/<'>" \ )< I' _~ "~&"'''''\ w.r<7'.) ,.~t \ .".t\~ ~ ,i'1-. ,-N- ). V ~"~_ ~(.". '\ l<:,) -\v $95,000.00 \ 0Pv/ $8, 120.00~' I)? $13,800.00 .R. $6,254.00 $88,000.00 $2,280,932.00 $80,440.00 ~ $271,420.00 I $66,704.00 I I I I $178,000.00 'I $56,000.00 II DESIGN DOCUMENTS GENERAL EXPENSE LABOR BURDEN ON ABOVE SITE IMPROVEMENTS PAVING c;:( )rA u.::t: OVERHEAD PROFIT CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY ..\<~ ,. f,{!-" ~i,.tJv '\ \0):- @.I jot. 'I;) 1\ !r- V'^ ;,V )(D Il 0' :\0~ \~.tt 1"% o ~_,__.._~ ",,",,,,.,.- I i $142,225.00 ! $131,348.00 / /// kdi:J' / 116D/. ~ { '"> v ~.",\ \" , . J-.r"" \ (~/. ()I:!1>R...-/ \ ~\ / " ~ .1~ 10 cp+*""..,.,:( "'. $60,000.00 $3,267,069.00 .... :~ ~ cor( (Po JOT ~\tIE.) - - ,- , - - .... - .... - ~ , ,... , Addendum #2 ,... Water PI ace Affordable Housing Development ,... . - r r r - ., Section r , I. ffi. ....., , I - I I ,I 'i I ,I r """ ~ - .... VL .... ,""" ,... - - Water Place Affordable Housing Development Amendment #2 Table Of Contents Introduction Proposed Development A Development Program B, Unit Categorization C, Architectural Description D, Deed Restriction E. Site Capacity F. SPA Development Data G. Conditional Use Within PUB Zone H. General Site ImprovementslPublic Facilities 1. Access 2. Grading and Drainage 3, Landscaping 4, Easements 5, Open Space 6, Utility Service a. Water b, Sewer c. Private Services 7. RecycleITrash Collection 8. Outdoor Lighting 9. ParkinglTransportation 1. Homeowners Association l Storage Buildings K Requested Variances L. Construction Schedule Exhibits A Engineering Report B. Soils Report C, Phase 1 Site Assessment D, EDR Report ,.. _. 1*: ... - - .... ,... - r-,: ~ \ ~ - - .~ ;"!> I iI'" I ,...... , r L INTRODUCTION This addendum shall provide revised and additional information to the land use application submitted to the City of Aspen by the City of Aspen Engineering Department (herein after referred to as the Applicant). The Applicant currently seeks Conceptual approval for the Water Place Affordable Housing Development, water plant storage structures and internal road re-a1ignment. The specific areas of review are as follows; . SPA Amendment #2 to Lot #4, City Thomas Property . Subdivision . GMQS Exemption . Conditional Review . Special Review . 8040 Greenline Review All relevant provisions of the Code with regards to these review requirements have been included within either the original application, Addendum #1 dated April 7, 1995, additional information dated September 8, 1995 or this Addendum #2. Specifically, the Applicant seeks approval to construct and sell and/or rent twenty two new fully deed restricted units, renovation and deed restriction of one existing dwelling, and associated site improvements. The following section, Proposed Development, shall supersede the Section III, Proposed Development of the original application dated March, 1995, and shall describe the development in detail. While the Applicant has attempted to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of this application, questions may arise which result in staft's request for additional information and/or clarification. The Applicant will be pleased to provide such information as may be required in the course of this applications review. - - llL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT "'" A. Development Program ""' - The proposed development program calls for the construction and sale and or rental of twenty two fully deed restricted affordable housing units plus the renovation, deed restriction and sale and or rental of one existing unit for a total of twenty three units. Six units will be in single family detached configuration while seventeen units will be in townhome configuration. Included in the development program is all associated infrastructure development and the demolition of the existing storage structure on the development parcel. .... ,- "" - - The program outlined in Table One is the result ofa survey of City employees. The survey resulted in a significant revision in program from that originally proposed by the Applicant. Specifically, the proportionate share of single family detached units has dropped in favor of smaller attached units which will sell for less money. Additionally, after several meetings with City Planning and Zoning commissioners and City Council members, the overall site plan has been revised to not only accommodate the revised program but represent a more pedestrian oriented neighborhood. ,,,..; - ,... -- ,... Density has been reviewed in great detail, as has program, and has been revised. The original application requested approval for sixteen units while this addendum to that application revises the density to twenty three units. Clearly, any development represents impacts to the project site, the surrounding neighborhood and to the community at large. The proposed development site represents relatively little impact when compared to other developments due to existing transit services, existing infrastructure, r r - I r - - .... extremely low visibility from off site and compatible adjacent land uses. Impacts will be realized to the existing City of Aspen Water Facility and the adjacent housing projects due to increase traffic. This is mitigated however with the improvements proposed to Doolittle Drive and the inclusion of a van pool service. This will not eliminate the impacts, but will instead minimize them. Offsetting these impacts will be the fact that twenty three families, including emergency response personnel, will be housed within City limits. Currently, several emergency response personnel, specifically water facility employees and police, live outside the range of adequate response time, endangering the community. Having these personnel on site will significantly benefit the community. Additional benefits to the community will be realized through housing City employees. This development will allow the City to keep employees it otherwise could not keep, and attract employees it otherwise could not attract. With these community benefits in mind, as well as the limited impacts, it became apparent to all that participated in the design process (City P&Z, City Council, City Staff etc.) that the density on this site should be maximized. As a result, the development program has been revised to a total of twenty three units. ... ~t ~ - - - - - ~ ... While maximizing the density was a goal of the design team, accommodating neighborhood concerns was equally important. For this reason, the units located on the lowest portion of the site (at the intersection of Doolittle Drive and Twin Ridge Drive) have been relocated to the upper portion of the site. This will eliminate the perceived density between Castle Ridge and Twin Ridge and provide perpetual open space between those two developments. - ,... r I - I 1 - .1'" 1 ~. - Lotting for the proposed units has been represented on the Lotting Plan ... contained in the attached plan set. All units will be on individual, fee simple, lots which will transfer at sale with the unit. ,......., - Table One Development Program -- Unit Type Total Units BdrmslUnit Total Bdnns SFlUnit Total Living Total Gar/Star ,.... SPD"'A" 2 3 6 1092 2184 800 SPD"B" 4 4 1400 1400 400 JOiooIl SFD"C" 2 4 8 1568 3136 800 Duplex "D" 3 3 9 1098 3294 675 Duplex ''E'' 3 2 6 936 2806 675 - Townhouses: 2BR"P" 3 2 8 902 2706 675 - lBR"G" 5 I 4 748 3740 1125 Studio "H" 3 I 3 600 1800 675 "" Totals 22 48 22,466 5,825 1'*, 1'" .... I I i r r r r ..... - B. Unit Categorization .~ ~, Unit categories have been proposed after review with the Housing Authority, that provide the City the greatest flexibility for future sale. The proposed Resident Occupied category is not intended to alIow for greater sales prices, as the units wilI be sold at cost. AdditionalIy, the standard appreciation cap as defined by the Housing Authority wilI be applied. The proposed categories for units are as folIows in Table Two. - !""". ...... Table Two Unit Categorization Unit Tvne Nwnber of Units Cate20rv Single Family "A" 2 RO Single Family "B" 2 RO Single Family "C" 2 RO Duplex "D" 3 RO Duplex "E" 3 RO Townhouse "F" 4 Cat. 4 To\\llhouse "Q" 4 Cat. 4 To\\llhouse "If' 3 Cat. 4 ~ - JOiOIlIt. .~ - "'" \ c. Architectural Description 1"'" I , All units have been designed to maximize their association with the neighborhood. The addition of front porches which are accessed from a common pedestrian walk wilI provide areas for neighbor interaction as welI as the ability to sit and watch children at play in the open space area. AdditionalIy, private space to the rear of each unit has been provided which leads to the existing native landscape. r r r r r ,... ,... - The orientation of the units maximizes solar exposure with all units facing south. Units have been designed with maximum glazing on the south facing elevation for maximum solar gain. Energy efficient insulation packages, heating systems and low flow water appliances wiU add to the overall efficiency of the development. "" ~. ....... Exterior materials for the units wiU be horizontal wood siding and asphalt shingle roofing. :--- r-.. Massing of the units has been lowered to one story on the project exterior elevations to minimize the perceived mass. On the project interior, the addition of porches wiU further reduce the scale of the front elevation. Unit locations have carefuUy avoided the existing mature scrub oak to provide a visual screen from off site views. - .... ;,..;-.;li. The floor plans and elevations for aU units as weU as perspective sketches of the neighborhood have been provided in the plan set as weU as reduced versions as follows. -., .... \ r r r r r r . j'~I~ 100"..0" "Y'd03LVM I ~ · Ij'llI . nT1II E r-o----- w <..? r--:===-~ ~ ~::::::..--..... I 1--::::::"----::-""" ) i ! (rj~~~~~\\\i J /. 1/1 ~.~.J I~'\\\ 1\\ ~ I / I i /----'. ~ \ . \ \ \. ~ I I I I il . /., \, ~ \.;'-.. . ~ I \ I I I II ! \ t \ '-.. " ~ I ! I \ '- ~ \ W-t. t'l ! \ '\ \ \ j \ ~ I ~ I \ \ \ \ ~ ;. \ ~ ) \ \ \ HI \\~ ) ) ) r. - )/;/ / 1 !- f I fl( \'\ \ I \. ;/ \\ \ \. I . ~'1l \. / \ \ \ ~ I . \ ~ \ ~ / ): / I f \ \ ) f.-> ?- /' ... - "" -, ,...,. ,- ~- ,.....' - ,.. ~ ~, I ~ \ , r ,... 1\ r r r . ~~~) -----Kl /' m .,!/ / (u..::J i i 'l/ C \ . ~7~/--- I \. l j.~~~ /'Y \ ~ \.~ \ \~ ~ ~nn ~ H ~~ ~h ~ \ ~. \ \. . ~~ ~ ~ ~ u It; i . .. ...... ...: ....-- . \ i n \ \ \ i h .. - .. -... __-__----/ f. '" ..... ...... ...-- /' I ~hhi ;~!m ~ ~ ~ ~."h. 88 L. ~ !'I" I '7 /' --- /- I l~ ~ ~. f ~ ,.. .J - ~ ~ "'" ~ W "'" . - J > ,~ J I .- t - ~ - ~' _._"~ '-I O. ~ 1\..../ \. '1 .~ ! ! '.. ~.. 0' If . ~. ~~ ~ "'1 l,~ il~. f , ~'W ..1' 1"". ~ 1 i "" '1 l '-c. ,"f. 1"" I i I I I , I ! r r r r r ~. ~" \ - ,.... - , , I I! I i ~ , I , t J t t} I t 5 ~ , ; , i !i; ~' ; , 1 I , ::l UJ 0 _ III > Cl Z UJ i > g - oJ a: o UJ .J ~ ~ - .J o o o ,... ,.,. ..... .- ~ ---.;..._.... ~- "'" .- ~-._.. -.-- .=-- ---_P~. ..- . , v...~~..~_ -- - ,.... .. ... ;:=. ---...._.~..'- '=== =- ...... - - -==-- -- - r r r r r f "\ ~ "~ ~ \: ..i-- ::.. J~ ~ --3b, " . "- .; ~ ~ ""\". .J. iot.'- '- -1 .., ...... ...011 .::::S. ~ ~ 'o_""'IIil; ~ ~ .) -::a'" lI~ .-- ~ ';.,... ~ '\- (" ~- J ~. ~ (: - . i ~,f'~. t ..\' -=z -~, --- 1 \ = ..., -".;;.;./. ' --,. -~-.... ~...s" ' .= ........J'...... - .~" ,,{.. . \ -= (. ~ ~: . ,~\ ,... - .... '"'"" - I- Cl Z U) ~ o :t .W . /5 ll. ~ ~ .... '-" r I 1 r r r _.. ~-,-- "- - .-~- - :.~~- "''''~-'. .....--- ~. ==;':'-'.--'- ;;:-:-- r I ':;-'-~--_...' .......----_. -'--'---' --,_.. .... I I , _....;.:;;.-7...,....'Z:O;:;;O';:~-. - ---..- - -..' ._-,---~""''''.' -.------.--- T T I """', ..--.-----.-,-"''''' ------..,',.,-,."._~. -_..........~.........__.. ,.. - ~ ,...,. !""' ,.... """'"' r r r I r r , r If it Q ILl oJ l- I- ::i o o Q "R' ',." ,\/ ; ~.,\".,~\.I,..J -",\, ~. -'.,r-:: .. . ~:&. -. "'\ . ---~,~ \ ~;~ w Cl 0( It o ~ Vl , ~ It o Q. It 0( o p z o ~ )i w oJ W I- Ul ILl ~ ~ ILl > - a:: o w oJ l- I- - oJ o o Q ~ p - ,... Fo, - - ~ ,- ,... ,.... r- - -. -"' "... b . CD CD ~ ill CD z 0 ~ - ~ )i Ul .J Ul !'- :t ~ :l ~ 58 0 p ~ Z 0 ~ )i Ul .J W ~ ~ <C w ;:! C ~ :> II. [ ~ I t z C 1I 0 ~ )i W .J Ul ~ <C Ul .~ ~ . II . I"'"" tE ~ ~ - I ,... OJI ~ ~ W ~ ~ ill . ,... ,... ,... ,... ,..., ,- z - <3: I .J - I Q. .J - W , - ~ ... .. -- > <0 ~ W ,- Q I .J I c ,... Z N - i 1 r r , .~ . .... r r <7~ .e<: LL r C' C/J r ex) CO Z it) r '~ <3: ,.. , . .. ~ .J " Q. r I .. I .. I .J 0 1--- W r .. I > .. , w l- f ~ .J ~ - , ~ Z 0 r .~ :) '- CD ,.. '!'" I r 'I I T I ..- ,... z ,... <( .J ,... 0. .J ..- i w i > - W .J C - - - -- z -- - N ,... r .... 1- 1, LL ,.", 1- 0' r ,on: fIJ r (X) I G) Z r 0 <( I ,. .J r c. I .. .J .. r c i w > .. ~ ~ .. rr. W ... 7" .J lr" - . ~ Z :J r ,. ~ ! r , I r I ,... ,... ,-. z - <t .J - 0- .J ,.... w I i > w ,... .J <ll , C .- Z (\.I - .,., r LL -i- i- 0' AN 1, ,on: UJ ,.- to r- Z 0) I 0 <t '"' I .J 0- '- '- r .J C ... W \ > '- '- r ~ w ... .J CI - - z r ~ . . ::) "" r ,,- \ r I """ .... """ u. { 0' en - j.. ,'!J& co ,... Z M <t 0) """ .J I, e. .. .. r .J W UJ .. > .. r I ~ UJ I- .J - r Z l- I , II) .:) ~ en :r I ,.. r ,... I r .... .... z .... <( oJ 0- i oJ .... w i > - . W \'l ,> ~ oJ - d C -- --. Z - (\J - ,.... ,.... ,.... Z <C - .J Q. ,.... .J W - > , W tI tI .J - C - Z N r I r ..., J J LL ~ ~ r ;'&/ C' , UJ r co I Z .~ f <( , I .J 1" T Q. II ,I, ~ II .J G. ~ - I W I I I > II , II , ~I . '. w T l- . . .J - .,.. 0 I- Z I UJ ::J ~ ,.. 'T I 1 I ... ... ... ... ... ... .... r r r r r ~ r I r I 'r" I i I r I r ~ .... U. 0' U) Z 0 0 ~ (0 oJ 0- Il oJ II :t w > II II' .W I-- oJ .- ~ I- Z U) .:) "" sz, t - .... D. Deed Restriction .... .... As previously stated, all proposed units will be fully deed restricted in compliance with the AspenlPitkin Housing Office Master Deed Restriction in effect at the time of approval. This master deed restriction will then be converted to the individual deed for each property at the time of sale and recordation of the deed. .... .... .... E. Site Capacity .... The original application proposed development on both the upper and lower portions of the development parcel. Through neighborhood input, development of the lower parcel has been abandoned. All development is now confined to the upper parcel. This parcel consists of approximately 4.09 acres which includes .87 acres of road right of way leaving 3.22 net developable acres. This yields a net unit per acre of 7.14 and a gross of 5.62 units per acre. As previously stated, six units are in single family detached configuration and seventeen units are in townhome configuration. As a comparison, the adjacent Twin Ridge development represents a gross unit per acre of 5.55 (25 units on 4.5 acres) while the adjacent Castle Ridge apartments are considerable higher. For this reason, the 5.62 units per acre of the proposed Water Place development is similar or less than the density of adjacent developments. The range of recently developed projects within the City of Aspen is 3.84 units per acre at Williams Ranch (predominately single family detached) to 33 units per acre at the West Hopkins development (all townhomes). .... .... r r r r r r r r 'r'" I - - F. SPA Development Data - - Lot 4, City Thomas property, SPA Amendment 54 Acres Residential development parcel, SPA Amendment 2 4.09 Acres Total RO.W. 0.87 Acres Open Space (dedicated common) 1.25 Acres Impervious Surface (roads, drives, buildings) 0.75 Acres Private Open Space (less dedicated common, RO.W., and impervious surface) 1.22 Acres Maximum FAR 0.45 Maximum Building Height (to midpoint) 25 feet Parking 2. 17/unit - - - ~ ,- G. Conditional Use Within PUB Zone r I r r r r r r r , Pursuant to the City of Aspen Land Use Regulations, affordable housing is a Conditional Use within the Public Zone District. the specific requirements have been addressed within Section IV., Review Requirements, D. Conditional Use within the original application. ,... H. General Site ImprovementslPublic Facilities 1. Access Access to the development parcel is via existing Doolittle Drive. In its existing condition, Doolittle Drive does not meet City standards for pavement width, gradient, and turning radii. To accommodate the proposed development, the Applicant has submitted plans for re-a1ignment r .... .... .... and widening of the road. These improvements will bring Doolittle Drive into 100% compliance with City standards. These improvements have been described in detail in the attached Engineering Report. .... .... Maintenance of Doolittle Drive currently is sufficient for Water Facility operations but not adequate for residential purposes. Upon development of this proposal, the road will require an increase in maintenance consistent to that of residential neighborhoods. r Off site impacts and improvements have been addressed within the attached Engineering Report. These improvements have been defined for lower Castle Creek Road as well as the Maroon CreeklHighway 82 intersection. Al; a result of studying these required improvements as well as the existing and projected traffic counts, a pro-rata share of the traffic impacts have been assigned to the proposed development. The Applicant will pay the pro-rata share of these improvements which is estimated to be $5,052.63 (see Engineering Report). .... .... .... ,.... 2. Grading and Drainage r r r r r r Due to the existing nature of the site, being on a minor ridge and knoll in an area that accumulates little runoff volume under natural conditions, the Water Place housing development will not result in any changes to historic runoff patterns or volumes in the area. This has been addressed in detail in the attached Engineering Report.. 3. Landscaping Landscaping will be provided for all units as well as common areas. The main element of this landscaping will be a water feature located within the ,... I r - - - landscaped common area. This water feature will pick up existing surface, untreated water, divert the water to the stream shown on the Landscape Plan and return the water to the existing channel. Plant material along this water feature consist of native material such as red twig dogwood and cottonwood. Landscaping will consist of native seed mix with wildflowers in the outlying areas with scrub oak, aspen and serviceberry. Areas adjacent to the units will receive bluegrass seed (we are currently investigating a drought tolerant fesue that performs like a lawn when watered and mowed but requires much less water to replace the bluegrass), shrubs such as wood's rose, alpine current, potentilla and snowberry as well as aspen and flowering crabapple. See Landscape Plan. - - - - r r r I r r r r r The proposed landscaping will provide "starter" landscapes for each unit that can be added to by the owner. However, adequate plant material and ground cover will be provided so no additional work will be required if this is not in the interest ofthe owner. Space will be provided within each lot for a garden and owners will be encouraged to take advantage of this space. 4. Easements All existing easements have been shown on the SPA Plan while new easements have been shown on the Site Development Plan and the Utility Plan. 5. Open Space .,... I r Within the development parcel, dedicated common open space has been provided. This space provides a pedestrian link to all the townhome units while providing a play area for children. Kitchens within the individual r I I .... .... .... townhome units have been oriented to the open space for ease of supervision of children at play. The paved walk has been designed to allow for bicycle riding, rollerblading etc. in a loop configuration without having to go out onto the street. A central water feature will provide an amenity for residents and has been landscaped with natural riparian vegetation. The balance of the landscaping within the open space has been left open with grass only to allow for active play/recreation. ,.., .... .... .... Included in the dedicated common open space parcel is the parking for the townhome units. Each units is provided two parking spaces, one of which is covered, with an enclosed storage unit. Additionally, three guest spaces have been provided. Van pick up, trash dumpsters and mail lock boxes have been located within this parcel. .... .... r . 6. Utility Service .... a. Water The site is located on the boundary of the City's gravity system and the pumped pressure zone for Meadowood. Service will be provided via a short main line extension from the existing 8 inch diameter main line located in Doolittle Drive that is fed from the pressure side of the Meadowood pump station. The proposed service is described in greater detail in the attached Engineering Report. r r I r r .... .I i b. Sewer Service will be provided to the proposed development via a main line extension of approximately 825 feet to an existing collection main located in the east end of the upper loop of the Castle Ridge ~ i .... I I , .... I I .... - ;:a housing site. A proposed sewer main extension is shown in the attached Utility Plan. The proposed service is described in greater detail in the attached Engineering Report. - - c. Private Services All private utility services are currently located within the project site with capacity to service the proposed development. The proposed services have been described in greater detail in the attached Engineering Report. .... . 7. Recycleffrash Collection ... .... 1/ I Common recycle and trash collection facilities have been provided for the proposed development. They have been located at the north end of the parking lot. It is anticipated that this \facility will be used by the seventeen townhomes. The single family homes will be serviced via curb side pick up. ~ I r- I 8. Outdoor Lighting r r J All outdoor lighting will comply with the City lighting code. Locations for outdoor lighting has been shown on the Site Development Plan in the attached plan set. Four fixtures have been located along the pedestrian walk in the open space area. Three additional fixtures have been located at pedestrian and vehicular intersection areas. While the actual lighting fixtures have not been selected at this time, it is the Applicant's intention to use historic fixtures and the lowest possible lighting levels. Specifics will be provided at Final Submission. r t JI .... 'il ! .,. I "r ! -, 'i ! ... I"" 9. Parkingffransportation ~, ... As a result of the extensive design meetings with City staff, P&Z and Council, a site plan which provided remote parking and increased pedestrian access was created. Parking for the seventeen townhome units has been located in a double loaded lot accessed from, and parallel to, Doolittle Drive which provides two spaces per unit and three guest spaces. This parking has been located approximately twenty five feet from the Doolittle Drive pavement edge, allowing for slight berming and landscaping to minimize the visual impact. One bank of the double loaded parking lot will be covered as well as provide storage for the residents (see Site Development Plan). ... ~ .... ~ ... Parking for the single family homes will be in garages which will hold two cars. The driveways have been sized to accommodate two additional cars parked tandem to the garage for guest spaces. "'" - ... Located centrally to the development is a van pick up. RFT A van pool service will be provided to the residents with service to and from the project and the City. As the residents of this development will be City employees, even though spouses or other dependents may work at other locations, a substantial number of residents will be leaving for, and returning from the same location at the same time, making this development an ideal candidate for effective van pool service. .... .... ..... - RFT A currently provides bus service to the immediate area with pick up/drop off located at the bottom of Doolittle Drive. A pedestrian link will be provided from the development parcel to this site for easy access. This walk has been shown on the Site Development Plan. .... ,.. I"" - - L Homeowners Association .... A homeowners association will be created for the maintenance of common ... open space areas, parking areas, roads and emergency access. Additionally, this association will pay for common trash pick up, and taxes ,.... on common space. A draft of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, the Articles ofIncorporation and the Bylaws were provided within the .... original application. These will require revision for the current proposed development program and will be submitted in the Final application. - J. Storage Buildings ... Two storage structures have been proposed for the area adjacent to the - water treatment facility. The purpose of these structures is to provide indoor storage of equipment and vehicles currently stored outside on the .- property. A description of these storage facilities was provided within the original application and the location has been represented on the SPA Plan. "'" K. Requested Variances - - , . As the architectural drawings represent, the units have been designed to maximize livability while provide the greatest level of efficiency within the least amount of square footage. The net livable square footage of the proposed units is less than that specified as a minimum by the 1995 Affordable Housing Guidelines. A variance is requested to allow for the decrease square footage for the following units; r r r- I f r r I .... ... .... Table Three Unit Sizes Type Reauired S.F. ProDosed S.F. Single Family "A" 1,400 1,092 Duplex "D" 1,200 1,098 Duplex "E" 950 936 Townhouse "F' 950 902 - r- - ~ It should be noted that the net livable square footage figures in Table One and above do not include the enclosed storage at the parking lot which is approximately 125 square feet per townhome unit. .... ,... The duplex and triplex structures require a 0 foot side yard setback. Duplex structures will have one five foot side yard setback. Unit 8, the interior unit in a triplex structure will have two 0 foot side yards. This does not require a variance from the side yard setback requirements of the Public Zone District as they are set for all Conditional Uses by the adoption of a Conceptual and Final Development Plan, pursuant to Article 7, Division 9, Planned Unit Development. ... .... .... , The setbacks represented on the Lotting Plan are as follows; - iil. , , 1. Table Four Setbacks Unit tvoe Front Side Rear Single Family detached 0 0, 5 total 5 Duplex 5 0, 5 total 10 Triplex 5 0 10 ,.... r r r r ,... - ,..... .... - - ,.. '" - i~ .... .... / - 1"*' ;;::. r r r r L. Construction Schedule It is currently anticipated by the Applicant that construction will begin immediately upon completion of the approval process and the recordation of all documents. This may permit construction to begin as early as fall of 1996. Construction will take place on one phase beginning with infrastructure and require approximately 24 months to complete. ,.... Exhibit A ENGINEERS SURVEYORS ::'G M_ SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER P.O. Box 2155 Aspen, CO 81612 (303) 925.6727 ~ FAX (303) 925-4157 .... - ,- - January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens THE STEVENS GROUP 312 Aspen Airport Business Center Aspen, CO. . 81611 RE: City of ASDen. Water Place Housina Proiect. Revised ConceDtual Subdivision and SPA Plan Submission Enaineerina ReDort Dear Tom: ,... This letter comprises an engineering report regarding the proposed Water Place Affordable Housing Project in Aspen, Colorado. This report is being provided in conjunction with existing conditions mapping, a Specially Planned Area (SPA) zoning amendment map, access plans and .... profiles and preliminary utility schematic plans for an amendment to the submission to the City of Aspen review process. The Water Place affordable housing project has been significantly revised in response to input from a variety of sources including members of the public, the .... Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. This work represents the results of many site visits as well as discussions and meetings with project neighbors, representatives of the various utilities and our meetings with the architect and members of the Aspen City staff. ~ 1"*'. .-. r r r r r 'i'" I Introduction The project site is located on Doolittle Drive off of the Castle Creek Road and south of the existing Castle Ridge Housing complex. The property proposed for construction comprises a portion of Lot 4 of the City - owned Thomas Property as defined in Amendment 1 to the SPA map. Lot 4 currently comprises about 54 acres and this proposal would utilize approximately 4.09 acres including 0.87 acres of road right-of-way to accommodate 23 housing units. The proposal now comprises 23 individual sale units (22 new units and the renovation of the existing on-site residence) with a total of 48 new bedrooms in units ranging from studios to four bedrooms in size. The site plan incorporates 49 off-street parking spaces including covered "car port" spaces, garages and driveway and guest parking as well as a van shelter and pedestrian access to the bus stop at the Health and Human Services building and the Marolt property trail. I have endeavored herein to identify engineering related elements of the development plan and to present the results of my discussions with relevant agencies. Water I met with Phil Overeynder of the City of Aspen Water Department with regard to this proposal. Water Department involvement in this project is really at two levels. First, the provision of service to the units and second, the impact of the project on the Water Department's operations, security 1001 Grand Ave.. Suite 2E. Glenwood Springs, Colorado' (303) 945-1004 ,... . - January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens ,.... Page 2 and access. ,.,.. ,... From the standpoint of service, the site is located on the boundary of the City's gravity system and the pumped pressure zone for Meadowood. Service to the 17 units located in the yard area closest to the water treatment plant would be via a short main extension from an existing 8 inch diameter main in Doolittle Drive that is fed from the pressure side of the Meadowood pump station. Individual tap sizes would be determined when detailed designs can be reviewed by the Water Department but I would anticipate that one tap per building would be needed. The townhouse and duplex units would then split into individual shut-offs and meters for each sale unit. . i-1" .... One possible opportunity at this site would be to utilize available raw water rather than domestic (treated) water for irrigation purposes. As you may be aware, there are substantial raw water flumes that bring Aspen's water supply to this property. While we have not, at this time, looked closely at the improvements that may be required to make raw water irrigation available within the project itself, there are ditches in close proximity capable of providing the necessary flow. As you are probably also aware, the City of Aspen has a policy of waiving a portion of its water tap fees for 100% affordable housing projects. Once the Water Department has had the opportunity of establishing a specific figure from the architectural plans, it is appropriate to request a tap fee waiver through the City Manager's office. I"" r r' I Capacity is generally available to supply the additional units without significant improvement to. the existing water distribution system other than the extension of lines into the project site. The site is also bisected by the two main water lines into town. The site development plan avoids grading work or buildings over the existing mains. The second amended SPA plan also incorporates changes within the remainder of Lot 4 for the Water Department including road realignments and construction of additional storage buildings in the vicinity of the existing treatment plant. Construction of housing at the yard site may require changes to the treatment plant fencing and access gates to prevent general public access into sensitive or potentially hazardous areas. Phil has expressed a preference that pets be prohibited from the property and that pedestrian access down the hill be incorporated into the site plan. We have also had more recent discussions regarding access alignment alternatives to route water department traffic higher onto the hillside to the west of the site plan. I have estimated the cost of a new road alignment and anticipate that rerouting of Doolittle Drive would add some $200,000 to the project budget as well as impacting steep slopes and existing vegetation. The current site plan seeks to further buffer the residential units from the Doolittle Drive corridor as well as minimizing intersection conflicts within the site plan. r r r i ':1 , .,.. I I ""'- ! Sewer "'I" I I , ,.,.. ,: i , I met with Tom Bracewell of the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) on March 21 st. Tom indicated that adequate capacity is available from the ACSD to serve the project although service to the specific sites will involve fairly extensive main construction totalling about 825 feet with manholes. An existing collection main is located in the east end of the upper loop of the ..,. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. ".... ,", "" January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens Page 3 Castle Ridge Housing site. A proposed sewer main extension is shown in our utility schematic and profile plans accompanying this report. ~. - Sewer service is available to the project subject to construction of the necessary extension, payment of appropriate tap fees (ACSD does not waive tap fees for affordable housing projects) and payment of a nominal tap fee surcharge for needed improvements to downstream lines that service this specific area. .... Miscellaneous Utilities """ Holy Cross Electric Association, Inc. ,.... Electric service to the Castle Creek area is provided by Holy Cross Electric Association, a rural cooperative. The main primary electric line to the Castle Creek area passes through the Water Plant property as an overhead line aligned approximately parallel to the Castle Creek Road and just to the west of the proposed units as reflected on the utility plan. Based on my discussions with Holy Cross field engineer Jeff Franke, there is sufficient capacity within the existing primary line to provide service to the Water Place Housing units. The only required extensions of the electrical distribution system would be buried primary lines to transformers located within 200 feet of the individual building envelopes. Service from Holy Cross would be provided subject to normal connection and meter charges as well as appropriate service agreements. ,.... .. ",^. U.S. West Communications ,.... The existing telephone feed for the City of Aspen Water treatment plant currently runs through the property as an overhead line on the electric system poles. There is probably not sufficient capacity within the existing line to provide service to this project, although Gary Gibson of U.S. West informs me that the necessary upgrades to the main line would be undertaken by U.S. West. The only internal extensions of the system required would be underground service lines to the individual building sites. Service would be available from U.S. West Communication subject to normal connection fees and service agreements. r "'" Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company Gas service to the Castle Creek area is provided by Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company (RMNG) with a 4 inch diameter gas line and was recently extended up the Castle Creek Road corridor to supply the Castle Creek Valley Ranch Subdivision. There is also a 1 1/:4 inch diameter line into the City Water Treatment Plant from the southwest. Ray Patch, RMNG Superintendent for the Aspen area, indicates that service capacity is available to serve the Water Place Housing project. Service would require extension of a gas line, probably down from the existing water treatment plant site, and service stubs with meters to each building envelope. Service is subject to normal connection charges and service agreements. - ~ ... - I"" I I SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. ,-, ~ ~, January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens Page 4 Cable TV ~ The cable TV system currently ends within the Castle Ridge Housing site directly to the north of the project site. Cable extensions of about 400 feet are required to serve this project. ..... Access and Traffic Impacts ,.... Internal Roads "'" Access to the 23 units of the Water Place Housing project will follow the existing Doolittle Drive that serves the water treatment plant. The existing road is 14 to 20 feet in width, has maximum grades of up to 11 % and extends some 650 feet from the existing access into Twin Ridge to the upper unit access. "'" - With the full development of all 22 new residential units, increased traffic volumes of up to 88 vehicles per day (vpd) can be expected based on Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority trip generation figures for comparable affordable residential units with an available transit option. ~, From the intersection at Twin Ridge, improvements are recommended to improve width, sight distances and drainage on existing Doolittle Drive. Curb and gutter on both sides of the street . into the property as well as borrow ditches for drainage on the uphill side of the road and culvert crossings for drainage as shown on the grading and drainage plan are recommended. We have shown a widening of the paved platform from current conditions to a 24 foot width overall to accommodate two-way traffic including trucks more easily. Some concerns were expressed at the neighborhood meetings regarding sight distances, speeds and safety issues for Doolittle Drive. Based on our discussions within the project team, we are recommending widening of the paved road section and speed limit and relevant caution signing in response to neighbor concerns. Another aspect of the current road condition to be addressed by the City of Aspen, as the project applicant, will be to improve winter plowing and maintenance practices and provide safer driving conditions for residents of the Water Place project. r- .,... .".. ,1JOioil. The site plan incorporates 49 parking spaces to accommodate a project of 48 bedrooms or 1.02 spaces per bedroom. This ratio exceeds normal code requirements for parking spaces and should avoid guest parking along Doolittle Drive. Current plans are to improve lower Doolittle Drive to a full-width two-lane standard with a centerline curve radius of 100 feet (compared to the approximately 65 foot radius of the current road) and under 10% grade meeting the current regulations for City of Aspen streets. - -- Traffic Generation .... I I In reviewing the potential traffic impact of the Water Place Housing proposal I have endeavored to assess the relative traffic impacts of the proposed subdivision as it relates to existing and future traffic associated with current development and build-out of the Castle Creek Valley corridor. ,.... r I I SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. .-. ._ I ~ January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens Page 5 Based on the general concerns for impacts to the Lower Castle Creek Road, as well as traffic impacts at the intersection of Maroon Creek Road and Highway 82 where traffic from Maroon Creek and Castle Creek combine at the intersection with the highway, I have attempted to compile all available, relevant data regarding traffic on Castle Creek ROad itself, combined traffic impacts at the Maroon Creek/Highway 82 intersection, and needed improvements to the Lower Castle Creek Road from the hospital campus entry down to the intersection with Maroon Creek Road. As this report will show, improvements to the Castle Creek Road have been, and continue to be, appropriate from the Hospital Campus entrance to the intersection with Maroon Creek Road where the vast majority of traffic volume is concentrated. "'" - - ~, This traffic impact report is based predominantly on a review of existing data including traffic counts generated by Pitkin County in 1985, 1990, 1993 and 1995, as well as projected traffic impacts for several projects recently completed or currently under construction in the Castle Creek Valley area, such as the Twin Ridge and Marolt Ranch affordable housing projects and the Castle Creek Valley Ranch. I have also incorporated extensive data from traffic studies dating back as far as 1981 for the Castle and Maroon Creek Road corridors as well as the intersection of Maroon Creek Road and Highway 82 and recent data from the Colorado Department of Highways draft Environmental Impact Statement for Highway 82. "'" ... ^ A review of the various traffic studies undertaken historically for the Maroon Creek and Castle Creek Valley corridors reveals a number of inconsistencies regarding current and projected traffic count information. As a result of these inconsistencies, I have been most inclined to use actual traffic count data collected by Pitkin County in analyzing existing volume conditions. I have generally attempted to be conservative (high) with regard to the potential impacts of future build- out and construction which is currently underway. f- fi"" Existing Conditions 1""'( The Castle Creek Road from the Doolittle Drive entrance to the intersection of Maroon Creek Road comprises approximately 2,000 linear feet of two-lane roadway with a pavement width which varies between 24 and 26 feet. The roadway currently meets a Pitkin County Class III Local Access Standard with two 11-foot through lanes, one to two-foot paved shoulders and additional gravel shoulders from six inches to four feet in width. Current design capacity of the existing road pursuant to Pitkin County Standards is between 700 and 1100 vehicles per day with a suggested speed of 35 mph. The Lower Castle Creek Road (between the Aspen Valley Hospital campus entrance and the intersection with Maroon Creek Road) is also encumbered with intersections accessing the Meadowood Subdivision, the Pitkin County Assisted Living Facility, and the Marolt Ranch Housing Project. .- "'" - ..... Current traffic volumes on the lower Castle Creek Road, based on traffic count studies undertaken by Pitkin County as recently as February of 1995, show a 24-hour traffic volume for that date of 4,633 vehicles at the Maroon Creek intersection. Converting this figure to annual average daily traffic (MDT) utilizing the Pitkin County MDT adjustment factors results in an MDT for Castle Creek as of early 1995, of 4,123 vehicles per day (VPD) (Calculating the MDT from limited, often one-day, traffic volume information is certainly tricky. I do feel that the additional data is useful in that it indicates that the true MDT on the lower Castle Creek Road ,... I I r SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. ,.... - ... January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens Page 6 may not yet exceed 5,000 vpd.) By averaging the more recent data, it would suggest that the current AADT on the lower Castle Creek Road is probably closer to 4,675 vpd than the 5,226 indicated in my March, 1995 report regarding the Water Place project. ... .... . -, ~. ".... ,... ,- ~ .,~ 1"" ""'" ."", - ~ ~ - SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. .... - ~ January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens Page 7 Existing facilities and development which contributed to the 4,675 VPD annual average daily traffic on the Castle Creek Road as of earlv 1995 included: ,.,.., - Marolt Ranch Housing Health & Human Services Building Meadowood Subdivision Pine Creek Cook House Elk Mountain Lodge Aspen Music School Pitkin County Assisted Living Facility Castle Ridge Housing Twin Ridge Subdivision Aspen Water Plant Prince of Peace Chapel Ashcroft Ski Touring Toklot Aspen Valley Hospital Mountain Oak Housing Miscellaneous Residential Units ~ ..... f'*", Clearly, some of the existing uses contribute traffic to the Castle Creek Valley corridor only on a seasonal basis such as the Ashcroft Ski Touring Center and the Aspen Music School. "'" ,....,. One of the consistent features of prior traffic reports dealing with the Castle and Maroon Creek corridors was the need for a traffic signal controlling the intersection of Maroon Creek Road and State Highway 82. This traffic signal was installed by the Colorado State Department of Highways in the summer of 1987, and has resulted in significant improvements to the level of service (LOS) of that intersection. The Maroon/82 intersection now functions at an LOS "C" (stable flow) with only intermittent queuing problems for traffic attempting to turn left into Maroon. Creek Road from the highway, or turn left onto the highway from Maroon Creek Road. The existing Maroon Creek/Highway 82 intersection is currently constrained by two major factors including its proximity to the Maroon Creek Road/Castle Creek Road intersection and the limited queuing capacity of the left turn lane from Maroon Creek Road onto Highway 82. Traffic Impacts of the Water Place Housing Project I"'" r "'" 1 The 22 new residential units of the Water Place Housing project will put up to 88 vehicles per day onto the Castle Creek Road based on Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority trip generation figures for comparable affordable residential units with an available transit option. It is expected that peak volumes departing and accessing the project will occur during 7:45 - 8:45 a.m. for the morning peak and 4:45 - 5:45 p.m. for the evening peak with traffic from the affordable housing generally traveling in the opposite direction as the peak flows for the existing roadway, that is, outbound to Highway 82 in the morning and inbound in the evening. We could reasonably expect, based on peak hour estimations generated, once again, by the Housing Authority, that up to 20% of the daily traffic volume, or 18 vehicles, could be expected to impact the Castle Creek Road and Maroon Creek/Highway 82 intersection during peak hours. - - ~ !""' Future Impacts on Castle Creek Road Table 1 lists the anticipated traffic impacts of several projects either recently completed, under construction or under consideration for the Castle Creek Valley. I have included estimated .... figures for the available units in the residential build-out category from the Pitkin County Owl .,- ., SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. ,.., .,... F January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens Page 8 Castle Maroon Buttermilk Comprehensive Plan Existing Conditions Report as prepared in 1987. I have reduced the number of build-out units anticipated in 1987 from 64 to 45 to account for the thirteen free market homes an 4 affordable housing units to be constructed in the Castle Creek Valley Ranch as well as a few homes recently constructed in the valley. These figures for future build-out result in a total average daily traffic volume oLover 5000 VPD for the Lower Castle Creek Valley from the hospital campus entrance to the intersection with Maroon Creek Road. While this calculated traffic volume isin excess of 5000 VPD, I do not consider the numbers here precise enough to state with certainty that traffic on Castle Creek Road will, at some point, significantly exceed 5000 VPD on an annual average basis. Current traffic volumes on Castle Creek Road undoubtedly include the impacts of temporary conditions such as on-going construction in the valley that would not be a major factor at build-out. .~ - -. .....' ~ .. Table 1 Lower Castle Creek Road Future Traffic Impacts Existing MDT, 1995 4,675 VPD \~: ~! Castle Creek Valley Ranch Residential Build-out - 45 units 120 VPD 430 VPD Total @ Build-out 5,225 VPD - t"" ,.... While I was initially skeptical of the calculated build-out traffic figure as being somewhat low, on further scrutiny, I would note that the construction of the Health and Human Services Building represents substantial completion of the potential build-out of the Aspen Valley Hospital Campus Area. In addition, as reflected in the Owl Castle Maroon Buttermilk Comprehensive Plan Existing Conditions Report, the limited available, developable private property further up the Castle Creek Valley limits the potential for additional units as reflected in the OCMB Report. Clearly, the majority of the higher density uses are clustered in the area of the Aspen Valley Hospital, Castle Ridge Housing and Marolt Ranch Housing projects. With completion of these various developments I would consider the calculated figure of 5,661 VPD at build-out to be a reasonable estimate. 1"'" ~ ~ ... - SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. "'" , ~. January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens F"'" Page 9 Required Road Improvements - Lower Castle Creek Road A - Pitkin County, in their County Road Service Area Report, of 1985, identified the need to upgrade the Lower Castle Creek Road from a Class III Local Access to a Class II Collector. While the calculated traffic volumes reflected above exceed the 5,000 vpd level somewhat, in my opinion, the proposed upgrade remains appropriate today based on both current and projected build-out traffic counts. Utilizing the Pitkin County Road Standards and Specifications issued in December of 1990, the upgrade would be to a Class IIA Main Collector status. The Class IIA offers a design capacity of up to 5000 VPD with two 12-foot travel lanes as well as six-foot paved shoulders resulting in a very functional section for vehicular traffic, pedestrians and cyclists. While a Class I Arterial standard provides capacity in excess of 5,000 vpd, it is our belief that the additional width and pavement associated with the Class I standard would not be acceptable to the community for the Castle Creek Road and that the additional paved shoulder width does not offer significant functional advantages over the Class IIA section. . ,... A#o. ,.... With regard to estimated cost of improvements to the 2000 linear feet of Castle Creek Road from the Maroon Creek intersection to the curve at the Aspen Valley Hospital entrance, I have included "" the following items; "... 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Stripping and grubbing. Dirt work to widen the roadway platform. Construction of paved shoulders. Overlay (optional). Drainage improvements. Re-striping. Engineering and contingency at 10% - .... The total cost of these items is estimated to be $300,000. Items of particular note that are not included in the above figure include landscaping, right-of-way acquisition (given the public nature of many of the abutting properties, I have not anticipated that right-of-way would represent a significant cost) and guardrails which may be appropriate when a widened platform is constructed on the high bank overlooking the Marolt Properly. ~ I ;! r"" We have analyzed a cost approach based on a proportionate share of road reconstruction costs for the net additional traffic volume associated with the Water Place Housing project as it relates to the anticipated build-out traffic volume of the Castle Creek Valley corridor. Using this approach, the Water Place project pro-rata share would be $5,052.63 toward improvements to the lower Castle Creek Road. Potential Improvements to the Maroon Creek Road/Highway 82 Intersection 'r" The Colorado Department of Highways Draft and Environmental Impact Statement included an analysis of the Maroon/Castle intersection with Highway 82 as it related to the future four-Ianing of Highway 82 itself. Based on feedback from Centennial Engineering, Inc., the consulting engineers who worked on the draft EIS, the only improvement of any significance to handle projected traffic volumes to the year 2010 was the addition of a second left-turn lane for traffic .... ..... SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. - - ~ January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens Page 10 turning left onto Highway 82 (down valley). One of the main reasons that Centennial Engineering recommended the addition of a second left-turn lane related to the short available length of the existing left-turn lane due to the conflict with the Castle Creek Road. More recent design work for the Highway intersection has been undertaken by our firm in coordination with Bob Fellsburg of Fellsburg, Holt and Ulliveg Consultants on behalf of the Highlands and Moore projects in the Maroon Creek valley. Estimating the costs of improvements to the Maroon Creek Road/Highway 82 intersection is somewhat complicated due to the unknown aspects of the specific four-lane design and revised entrance to Aspen, if constructed, as well as the potential need to relocate utilities and traffic signal systems. I would certainly note that the upgrade of the intersection is not warranted at this time nor would it be warranted by the impacts associated with the Water Place Housing project alone. Certainly, improvements to the intersection at Maroon Creek and Highway 82 become appropriate at such time as either the four-lane is constructed or traffic volumes from the combined roadways begin to, once again, degrade the level of service of the existing intersection. Reconstruction of the Castle/Maroon/82 intersection is currently estimated at $500,000.00 and could be fully funded by the Highlands and Moore projects based on current discussions within Pitkin County. :"...., - - ~ r "'" I r Drainaae ~ I have also evaluated the Water Place properly with regard to internal drainage design. The main. development site in the upper yard area sits on a minor ridge and knoll in an area that accumulates little runoff volume under natural conditions. Based upon my analysis, it is my opinion that the project will have minimal impact on the historic drainage patterns, peak flows and runoff volumes. r- r I Currently, runoff is generally west to east or west to north off the properly. This historic drainage pattern would be unaffected by the proposed construction. The roadway system will generally cross perpendicular to the major drainage basins on the properly. These basins will be culverted and kept in their historic channels. Surface sheetflow would be intercepted by the roads and directed toward the major drainage basins. Typical drainage considerations such as uphill drainage swales, foundation drains and sloping backfill away from the sides of the structure will be adequate to provide satisfactory drainage at all building sites. I have identified potential locations for small detention ponds for sediment removal, groundwater recharge and to delay any actual runoff until after the storm peak. r r r r r r In summary, it is our opinion that the Water Plant Housing project will not result in any changes to historic runoff patterns or volumes in the area. Because of the density and project location well above area streams and water courses, we do not anticipate the introduction of any pollutants into area stream systems. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. .... ~ ...... ,~ January 23, 1996 Mr. Tom Stevens Page 11 . I trust the above comments are sufficient for conceptual submission purposes. Please feel free to contact me if I may provide additional information or detail. _ Very truly yours, - .I/iii- j(iiit.. -. ",.. i-~ - - --- "'" .~ r r r SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. CJ (;j, D\~ aZ..;'OM:E Principal, Aspen Office JHljh 95030ERJ SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. HepworthPawlak Geotech TEL:303-94S-S454 l"'" Jan 23 96 11:54 No.003P.Ol Exhibit B HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL,. INC. !ozo _IN Clmwo04 Spdftga. CO 81601 Fox 970 "5-ll454 Phone 910 945-7988 ~ :~ ~ - ~ ~ r- ,..... SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED WATER. PLACE HOUSING NORm OF WATER PLANT, DOOLIT1'LE CIRCLE ASPEN, COLORADO r ~ ~ , I JOB NO. 195 192 MAY 8, 1995 r , r" I r r r r T PREPARED FOR: CITY OF ASPEN ATl'N: CRIB CARUSO 130 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Phono , Pollt-It' Fax Nola 7671 To . So".. j-K.. CoJDepl, .: Fe.. Ill;;:l.",,-- S-q "'" , HepworthPawlak GeotechTEL:303-945-8454 Jan 2396 11 :55 No .003 P .02 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. S02lJ KolcIlS4 G1eIlwoo4 SprllIJO, CO 81601 Pill 970 945-8454 Ph_ 970945-1988 - May 8, 1995 ~, ~ City' of Aspen Attn: Cris Caruso 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Job No. 195 192 .... .... Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Water Place Housing, North of Water Plant, Doolittle Circle, Aspen. Colorado. f-o' Gentlemen: 1-" ! As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study for the proposed housing development at the subject site. r Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled in the proposed building area consist of up to 3 1/2 feet of topsoil and till overlying medium dense to dense silty clayey sand and gravel with cobbles. Groundwater was encountered in the borings between 6 and 10 feet below the ground surface. i"" I r The proposed buildings can be founded on spread footings placed on the natUral granular subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3, 000 psf. r r The report which follows describes our investigation, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during design. and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report. please contact us. 1'" I r r I r I :f Sincerely, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. ~ Daniel E. Hardin. P.E. Rev. By: SLP DEHlrr cc: Gibson Reno - Scott Smith .".. .1 HepworthPawlakGeotech TEL:303-945-8454 ,... Jan 23 96 11 :55 No .003 P .03 - TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ ~ PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY. . . . . PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . 1 1 - SITE CONDmONS . . 1 FIELD EXPLORATION . . . . 2 ,... SUBSURFACE CONDmONS . 2 ...... DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . FOUNDATIONS . . . . . . . . . FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS . FLOOR SLABS . . . . . . UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM SITE GRADING . . . SURFACE DRAINAGE . 3 3 4 5 6 6 7 I'"" r r r LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . FIGURE 1- LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 7 i , ., FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 & 5 - GRADATION ANALYSES TEST RESULTS r TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 11'" I r I ".. I r ,I r T .1 HepworihPawlakGeotech~EL:303-945-g454 ,... Jan 23 96 11:56 No.Q03 P.~4 .- --- PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ~ . This report presents the results of a subsoil study for the proposed Water Place Housing development to be located on Doolittle Circle, Nonh of the city water plant, Aspen, Colorado. The project sire is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to City of Aspen. dated March 28. 1995. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples obtained during the field exploration were rested in the laboratory to determine the engineering characteristics of the on-site soils. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundations. This report summarizes the clara obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed consuuction and the subsoil conditions encountered. Prior to drilling the borings for our study, we spent a day drilling shallow auger holes for Waste Engineering as pan of their Phase II site assessment. ~ If/IiiIt4. ~ r- ! r r I r "i' I PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION r r r The proposed development will include 8 single family houses, two duplexes and a four-plex. The buildings will be 2 story wood frame strUCtures over possible basements or crawl spaces. Ground floor will be structural over crawl space or slab-on- grade. Grading for the structures is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 4 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations contained in this report. ->>'I""' ! I I T T SITE CONDmONS The site is occupied by a wood frame house west of Boring 1 on the west side of Doolittle Circle. The majority of the site, to the east of Doolittle Circle, is a storage ""r" I ., HeplllorthPallllak Geotech TEL:303-945-8454 ,.... Jan 23 96 11:56 No.003 P.05 .,... - 2- ~ .... yard for equipment, electrical transformers, pipe, etc. The area is relatively fiat with a , gende ,slope down to the cast. There are steep slopes down to the north on the north side of houses 8, 9 and 10 and steep slopes down to the cast in the area of houses 5, 6 and 7. There is a steep slope down to the north from Doolittle Circle to the area of the proposed four-plex. Vegetation at the site consists of oak brush in the four-plex area, and deciduous trees around the north and east sides of the storage yard. An existing large pit was observed in the vicinity of House 5. We undersrand the pit is used by the City as a sump for street sweepings and vehicle wash down. Snow cover was patchy over most of the site but was on the order of 2 feet deep in the four-plex area. .,.... ,... - r I FIELD EXPLORATION r r r r The field exploration for the project was conducted on April 17, 1995. Four exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. I to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The proposed four-plex area was not accessible to drill equipment due to the steep slopes, trees and snow cover. The borings were advanced with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted BK-SIHD drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. In addition, we assisted Waste Engineering on April 14, 1995by drilling several shallow auger holes as directed by them. Samples of the subsoils for our study were raken with a I 3/8-inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. This rest is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were raken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. r I I 'i'" I I ~ I T I SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS T I Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about 1 to 3 1/2 feet of topsoil or fill overlying medium .r H-P GEOTECH T I HepworthPawlak Geotech TEL:303-945-8454 Jan 2396 11:57 No.003 P.06 I"'" """ -3- ;~ ...... dense to dense, silty to clayey sand and gravel containing cobbles and boulders. . Drilling in the dense gravel with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered. in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, Atterberg limits testing and gradation analyses. Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1 lI2-inch fraction) of the natural coarse granular soils are shown on Figs. 4 and 5.' Atterberg limits testing indicates the clay and silt portion of the subsoils is of low plasticity. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. Free water was encountered. in the borings at the time of drilling between 6 and 10 feet. When checked ten days later, water levels were between 6 and 8 feet. Borings 2 and 4 had caved off at depths of 3 1/2 to 5 feet indicating water may be encountered near that level. The subsoils were moist to wet. ""'"'" - I .1""< r r DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS I , I FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsoil conditions encountered. in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. Shallow groundwater may impact basement conslIUCtion. In general, floor levels and crawl space grade should be at least 1 foot above the water level. The existing pit area should be avoided for building houses unless it is properly excavated and backf1lled with structural fill. We have assumed that the subsoil conditions in the area of the four-plex are similar to those encountered. in aUf borings. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Based on experience. we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. r I r ! "... , I I ~ I T , I 1"f .1 Ii I H.P GeOTeCH ""I' I HepworthPawlak Geotech TEL:303-945-8454 r """ I r r r r i' " I r r r I r I"" r , ;JiIijii;O. r r r I r I ,- Jan 23 96 11:57 No.003 P.07 -4- 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls . and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 42 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as diSCIlssed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. S) All existing fill, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to relatively dense natural granular soils. Structural fill can consist of the on-site granular soils excluding topsoil and oversized rock, compacted to at least 100% of Standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. Soft areas may be encountered and require their removal or stabilization. 6) A representative of the soil engineer should observe all footing excavations prior. to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are free standing and can be expected to'deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateralean:h pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 40 pef for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffIC, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an H-P GeOTECH HepworthPawlak r r r r r :1 r r r r I r , i " I r- 11 r I , ~ I r r r r , , r I Geotech TEL:303-945~S454 11:58 No.003P.DS Jan 23 96 -5. upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foUlldation wall or retaining strUCture. An underdrain should be provided to prevent . hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacred to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected even if the material is placed correctly and could result in distreSs to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.50. Passive pressure against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 350 pcf for properly compacted backfill and IlDn-buoyant conditions. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil,are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-on-gracie constrUction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4-inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material H.P GeOTeCH HepworthPawlak r r r r r Geotech.TEL:303-945-84S4 Jan 23 96 11:58 No.003 P.09 -6- should comist of minus 2-inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No.4 sieve and less than 2 % passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 9S % of maximum standard Proctor demity at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegeration, topsoil and oversized . rock. r ,I UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Free water was encountered during our exploration at depths of 6 to 10 feet. We recommend below grade construction. such as retaining walls. crawl space and basement areas, be protected from weuing and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an . underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent fmish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2 % passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 1/2 feet deep. The under slab gravel in basement areas should be connected to the perimeter foundation drain with interior lateral perforated drains. r r I I I r r r r ~ I SITE GRADING The risk of construction induced slope instability at the site appears low provided the buildings are located away from steep slopes and cut and fill depths are limited. We assume the cut depths for basement levels will'not exceed one level, about 8 feet. Fills should be limited to about 8 feet deep, especially at the downhill sides of the development (Houses 5 to 10) where the slope steepens. Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to tin placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to 95 % standard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20% grade. r r r r r r H-P GeOTSCtl HepworthPawlak GeotechTEL:303-945-8454 - , ~ r ,..... 1- r I r r r r r r I r r r r ., I r r r , Jan 23 96 11:59 No.003 P.I0 -7. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to . 1 venical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. The risk of slope inslability will be increased if seepage is encountered in cuts and flatter slopes may be necessary. If seepage is encountered in permanent cuts, an investigation should be conducted to determine if the seepage will adversely affect the cut stability. We should review the grading plans for the development prior to construction and perform additional analysis for slope srability, surface and subsurface drainage as needed. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residential buildings have been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backf1ll should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted [0 at least 9S % of the maximum standard Proctor denSity in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum S1alldard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimUm slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. S) Surface water should not be concentrated and directed into the Steep down slopes without adequate erosion protection. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering prinCiples and pl'llCtices in this area at this time. We make no other warranty either eJtpressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations H-P GEOTECH - , HepworthPawlak GeotechTELl303-945-8454 Jan 23 96 11:59 No.003'P.11 ,..... -8- r- ! r submitted in this report are based upon the data obrained from the exploratory borings . drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. I, the proposed type of constrUction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and cxtrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during constrUction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. 1- r I r I This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design pUlposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our infonnation. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer. r r r r r r Sincerely, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. r I I . ~~~'\l~r .;~,~t.\)li Nt(;/.", ~ ,," :,J"...r..~.",....".~F'~. Ii . ..~\. ~.~. ~ - II ~..."'c" \ Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. :1(.) 24443 '1 i ~..~~. 1!'-)/1Iol,s-lf Reviewed By: \q..l.. ..,:.~.;~ . '(";;;SS;iiN'~'h~\:'~~' 'iI.. ,,~. '.l\\: ya ,",q'hl"""\1"'''~'' - - -.'n <::. .,'....-\,A._ F~. Ta.1 . ~~ Sreven L. Pawlak, P.E. r I ,.. ';1 I T T T DEHlrr H-P GEonCH r- ,..., r- I ,.... I r r r .1 r r r 1 r r T T T ',I r T T I , HepworttlPawlak Geotech TEL:303-945-8454 Jan 23 96 12:00 No.003 P.12 lI.I ..J U !: u PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING HOUSE 0:~ . BORING I IIJ ..J l- I- ::::i o o o " " EXISTING MAINTENANCE~. _ ~\ BUILDI~~~ \ S \. r ,.. _ -- S\Jl'e, \...... --....- f\.OOI\ ..o:\). ",:\1\\1.'. ,:\ S5\,)- eE.~C~" ,00.0 I E.\.E.'4. ) BORING 2 -N I BORING 4 '.~, ROUGH LOCATION OF EXISTING PIT I' I ( APPROXIMATE SCALE I PROPOSED' I I" = 40' BUILDINGS[ J (TYPICAL) 0~ ',_ ~_ I ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER BORING 3 STORAGE AREA 8 . . ROUGH LDCATION OF FORMER ,-- DYNAMITE STORAGE BUNKER <> 19:5 192 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. Inc. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS "". ,"'" HepworthPawlak Geotech TEL:303--945-8454 Jan 23 96 12:00 No.003 P.13 ;-' Boring 1 ~orina 7. Boring 3 l'loring 4 ~19v.-98.7 ~eet ~lev.~97.6 feet P.1ev.~9a.O feet tlev.;97.6 feet ,.... - o - I I 48/12 a/12 WC=1l.4 .,; -200..48 WC",16.7 D!)..A14 5 7.7/12 -~O ..33 0 1 27/8 we-lO.a ......:. \4C",10 . 9 -200=32 +~-68 .' +4=30 10 - 0 =47 -200=32 LL=23 PI=<6 ... 52/8 52/12 ., "' \'IC_a.7 )~ ~ .- +4..33 ~ -200-32 '" ? a. ~ ~ 15 88/12 105/8 '. r r r r r r r r r r r 20 5/0 3717 NC-5.8 +4=48 -200=17 ,0/12 ~2111 NOTE: Exp1ilnation of. symbols is shO\~n on "iq. 3. "... I T T 195 192 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. Inc. Logs of Exploratory Borings I) 5 ... 1 l) :c '" .c '"' ~ JJ' IS "2 Fig. 2 _ Hefl!:!!.!!rth!'~I#.1 ak GeotechTEL: 303-945-8454 LEGEND: '"'" ,... - (- r- I Jan 23 96 12:01 No.003 P.14 ~ ~ ~ ~ i P FILL; Driveway road base in Borings 1 and 4; clayey silt and sand with scattered gravel and cobbles, mottled browns in Boring 3. TOPSOIL; silt, sandy. gravelly, organic. soft, moist, dark brown. SAND AND GRAVEL ISM-GM); silty to clayey, scattered cobbles. medium dense. moist, reddish-brown. GRAVEL IGM); sandy. silty, with cobbles. possible boulders, medium dense to dense. moist to wet. reddish brown to brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California liner sample. I I Drive sample; standard penetration test ISPT), 1 3/8-inch 1.0. split spoon I sample, ASTM D-'586. '8/'2 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 8 blows of a '40-pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler '2 inches. r r r r 0.'0 ! - IT I I --... 'I""" I r .,.. I T I T !"'T"'" I I .,.. I 'i I' I Free water. level in boring and number of days after drilling measurement was made Practical rig refusal. Where shown above bottom of log, indicates multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. Cave depth at time of water check. '0 days after drilling. NOTES: 1 . Exploratory borings were drillad on April 17. 1995 with a 4-inch diamatar continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were manured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site Plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings wara measured by instrument lavel and raf.r to the Bench Mark on Fig. 1, 4. The exploratory boring locations and elavatlons should ba considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs rapresent tha approximate boundaria. betwean material typea and transitions may ba gradual. 6. Water level reading. ahown on tha logs wera made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Aul;tuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory T e&ting Results: WC = Moisture Content (%1 DD = Dry Density IpcfJ +4 . Pereanr retained on No.4 sieve .200 = Percent pSlsing No. 200 sieve LL - Uquld Umit (%) PI - Plesticity Index (%1 ~'95 192 S HEPWORTH-PAWLAK ~ I GEOTECHNICAL, Inc. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 3 'T I , , HepworthPawlak Geotech TEL:303-94S-84S4 - -- - - ,- I""' ~, I r r r I r r I i I ! r ! , r I 1 ! r T T I Jan 23 96 12:01 No.003 P,lS ..'tOlIOMETeR ANAL YSoS .......,u-u. "" MIN. .. ..... . ...... UJi.. AN " lk uti' HlH4.N ...... :r .. ... .. cv.yTO SIL.' ..,.. tll;a OIA...ETER OF PARTICLE IN M'LLIIolF.TE1lS SAHli 'INt! MEUIUM CU^"SE CODDLES ....,. IoU '1.1 31.' . QIlAVGI. rtNE; COA"!;, , GRAV&I, 28 .. SAND 25 .. SILT ANO CLAY 47 .. LIQUID LIMIT 23 .. PLIISTICITY INlltx 6 ... SAIOPI.EOF Very Silt;y.iClayey Sand and FAQIol Boring 2 at 5 and 10 feet (Combined Gravel .. & 9 .. .. ~ u .. W L "'VDnOMETefl ANAl. VSI~ UMIIi. MAUtN05 SUNG ^N^l 'Y'SIS ",.5. CIAHl'''IU 1Cf~ltas CtbVI SUUAlIIE. O~5 '.. -,,, .. t"'- :r' !I""'''' ,. "'I, , Hn. 8......'$..IN. I. . ,. .. ... ,. .. 10 . ..... ,1.2 t.' ... ,. .... .ora .. .0'1 'JIll ,I'" ,a' IUD I.'. .a ... 1.0 OIA"'F.Tl!R OF PARTICLE IN MILUIolI!TI!IQI .""'" F1NI! UIiDlU" AME '&'. &1 on"y€(,. MN COM!!.! CVo" TO ....T IS CllllVE1. 30 .. 39 .. SAND .. SILT AND CLAY 32 .. .. I.IClUID I.II1lT PU\Sl1CITY INOIll SAMPLEO' Silty Clayey Sand and Gravel I'AOIol Boring 3 ~ 5 Feet 195 192 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. Inc. Fig. 4 GRADATION TEST RESULTS ... He~worthPawlak Geotech ~EL:303-945-8454 Jan 23 96 12:02 No.003 P.16 ,-. tolYOnoMeTEn ANA'-Y'IIS ....E. .tI.MMNUIi ..... 5'flve AN^l. YSIS '''It.a1M.,,....,..''''' .'" ~.4ft.:ID "I' '11I .. .... '" ,.....".. o to - .. >It .... ... ,... ... - - .... .O:U MI. ,J_ ,201,..,.810 '.ID ,j.a blAMETEn OF PARTICLE' .N MilLIMETERS SAMI MEOtUM u. .... ,0., :11., . Cl.AY TO In..r "Hie. OAf_ GnAVel FiNe eo....:;!! COlcn.lES r GRAVel. 33 ... Sl\HD or. 35 or. SILT AND <:LAY 32 ... ... ~'QIIlD LIMIT PLASTICITY INDlll( r SAMPLE OF Silty Clayey Sand and Gravel FROM Bodng 3 at 9.5 feet r .1 ",vDnOMeTE~ ANAl. VSIS SIEVf: AN^,- VSIS r-. Jt&\U'NC):; u.s. CfAHUAltU (il;IIII!S Ct,;EAA SQU,NIe. U~E-HJNG:i eeY'H t,...... ...... 'WIN "'ftft .,.., "N' '.n~ "'" .'It. nv :r' ,.0.... r I " z ;;; w ~ L Ii g .. -- - - "0 r I r - - - " 40~ :; I. .... ~ z u OOu .. ~ L to r .. .. r CLAy TO aT M. .1'" suo .... ,4' r.a btAME'Tm a... p"nTIC,-. IN ....U.I..ET&RS ,_ FINe MEOI"M Mile ~ .... JU 12" 'R ... ..... .. .. .0'. .A1 T' I GnAveL fINe GOAnSE CQIlllt.EI GRAVEl. 48.. UQUID ~""'T SAND ... 35 .. SILT AND CLAY PLASTICITY IND\Ill 17 "" .. r , SAMPl.EOP Slightly Clayey Silty Sand and Gravel FROM Boring 4 at 5 feet . . T 195 192 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. 'nc. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5 T , .... HepworthPawlak Geotec~ TEL:J03-945~8454 - .... .... ,... r- I , r r r r r r I ! "... I I I T T , T T u ~ . .... < o 2 :J: o UJ I- o UJ o ~ < .... ~ a. , :J: I- a: o 3: a. w :J: N en .... In en .... ci Z III o ..., ~ ....J ::> en w a: Ii; w l- >- a: -0 WI- ....l< alo: <(0 l-co <( ....J u.. o >- a: <( :E ~ ::> en lr Ii : . ; I Ii! rIg !i ~ . " .. !l ! i i ~ ! I w ~ Ii g ~ ~ ! ! l5 .. .. ~ ! 2 ~ II! f g ;; i i .. ~ Ii i .. I ! L; i.. i Q i a ~ r i ~ .. ... .... :( ; I ;; Z Ii .. I i I !! i .. .. :I " Ii ~ (I) '" ~~ '" " u i >-" z: <: iii ~ ~ ?: > ,iii <Xl N "" M "": <Xl .... c:i .... .... Ln M '" .... ! 'g ~ ., " "'2 i ~ " > Ii CD c/) 1:- >u CD > it.:: o ii5'ij l: ~1; :: 1)._ c/) >1:1 ell M N M ,.. M "" It! N CI) N "" .... .... ": cg .... ::1 In i~ ...8 N 1 ! &0 " " i i " " Ii i en en > >- CD CD 1:- ~ o u > >- J:!. ~ iii iii N N M M ~ ~ o M M M eft ci ,.. .... CI) It! .., .,; M Jan 23 96 " <: ., " c '" c/) >- -= in >- '" ~ o > 2~ CD.. .-..... 01:1 ,.. .... II) M CI) "" <Xl It) In "" 12:03 No.003'P.l? . . I - L CONFIDENTIAL t' ,- PHASE I ENVIRONMENT AI.. SITE ASSESSMENT - April 13, 1995 r- -I City of Aspen Property Castle Creek Water Treatment Plant Aspen, Colorado r- ! r r r r I Prepared for: Mr. Chris Caruso City Engineer City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 r I ,... I I r I r ., .1 Prepared by: r , i Waste Engineering, Inc. 2430 Alcott Street Denver, Colorado 80211 (303) 433-2788 'I I T T 1 T 1 , Exhibit C ,.r ., ....i ... TABLE OF CONTENTS ,. ...! ~ ,""'" Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 I . Terms and Conditions ........................................ 1 I'"" Site Description ............................................ 2 r r r Physical Characteristics ................................... 2 Adjacent Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Historic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Review of Regulatory Agency Records and Environmental Databases ........... 4 I"" I r Conclusions and Recommendations ................................ 5 ATTACHMENTS I"'" .\ I Figure 1 - Location Map Figure 2 - Site Map r I Acronyms i" ! Photographic Log ~ I Environmental Data Resources (EDR) Report 'i"" I r r I + .,.. , I , - - INTRODUCTION .... This report has been written to comply with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Phase I Site Assessment Requirements. ..... This site assessment includes, in the following sections, a site description (which includes physical characteristics, adjacent properties, and historic site conditions) a review of regulatory agency records and environmental data bases, and conclusions and recommendations. r- I r- i Waste Engineering, Inc. (WEI) performed a limited site reconnaissance of accessible areas on the subject property in the field on March 29, 1995. Historic records and aerial photographs were examined in an attempt to construct the developmental history of the area, to identify historic land use and to identify potential historic environmental hazards or contaminant sources. Regional geologic and hydrologic maps were reviewed to determine depth to groundwater and direction of groundwater flow. r r r I TERMS AND CONDmONS This assessment is based on the information available to WEI at the time of the investigation and provides an indication of the status of the site at that time. The opinions expressed concerning the environmental risks or migration of contaminants are specifically addressed in this report. r I The goal of the processes established by this practice is to identify recognized environmental. conditions. The term "recognized environmental conditions" means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or, petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. This process is designed such that completion of the process, as described in this report, should constitute all appropriate inquiry into the site and uses of the site to qualify for the innocent landowner defense to Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) liability. r r I r , 'I'"' I i r i A complete definition of the site conditions would require substantial testing and a more detailed investigation. Future conditions may change, and further investigation should be completed if contamination is suspected or if site conditions substantially change. Because of uncertainties related to subsurface conditions and the changing nature of site conditions, it is not possible for WEI to provide guarantees with this assessment. ,.. , I T I T I ,.. I I - - SITE DESCRIPTION ... The property investigated for this site assessment consists of a parcel of land located southwest of Aspen, Colorado (Figure 1). This tract of land is more accurately described as land situated in the NWl/4 of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West, of the 6th P.M. .- .- , The site consists of several buildings associated with the Castle Creek water treatment plant (Figure 2). The maintenance shop is situated near the center of the property. The maintenance shop is used by the City of Aspen for storage of tools, machines, and limited vehicle maintenance. No grease traps or other similar devices were identified by WE! within the maintenance shop. r r r , Numerous electrical transformers have been or are currently stored east of the maintenance shop (see photograph 3). According to Ron Ferguson with the City of Aspen Water Department, this site has been used for electrical transformer storage for at least 20 years. A sediment trap is situated near the east end of the transformer storage area. This area is used to collect and detain stormwater sediment and sludge from city street-sweeping operations (see photograph 6). City personnel were obserVed discharging materials during WE!'s site visit (see photograph 5). r , , Two above ground storage tanks (ASTs) were previously stored outside of the maintenance shop. According to Mr. Ferguson, these tanks were used for storage of diesel and regular (leaded) gas from approximately 1985 to 1990. There were no visible indicators (Le., soil staining) of these two ASTs during WE!' s site visit. However, a complete investigation of this area was precluded by several feet of snow. r I 1'"" I I Physical Characteristics r I Aside from the buildings associated with the Castle Creek water treatment plant, the majority of the site remains undeveloped. Vegetation on the subject property consists primarily of scrub- oak and other native vegetation. 'i I I The property has fairly steep relief throughout, which is typical of tributary canyons to the Roaring Fork River in this region. The topographic relief at the site and adjacent land is varied, with an overall slope toward Castle Creek. Surface water resulting from storm events or snow melt in the region generally flows toward Castle Creek. r I ... I i Groundwater at the subject site was not directly measured. United States Geological Survey (USGS) maps indicate that groundwater depths vary, with the shallowest groundwater closest to Castle Creek. Groundwater movement in the vicinity varies depending on specific topographic conditions but is inferred to be toward Castle Creek, located approximately 0.3 mile east of the subject property. r T T I According to the preliminary "Geologic Map of the Aspen Quadrangle, Pitkin County, Colorado" (B. Bryant, 1971), the site geology is comprised of surficial deposits which are -2- .,.. I - ,..~,:, - described as "poorly sorted moraine deposits ranging from silt to boulders. In many places it has hummocky or ridge-and-trough topography." - r r r According the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil SurveY of Aspen-Gyosum Area. Colorado, the property is dominated by the Yeljack-Callings complex with 12 to 25 percent slopes. This unit is described as "deep and well drained, on ridgetQPs, benches, and mountainsides. It formed in alluvium and colluvium derived dominantly from sandstone and loess. If this unit is used for homesite development, the main limitations are a modified shrink- swell potential, low soil strength, the restricted permeability, and the depth to stones, sand and gravel. " .... Adiacent proJ'tlrties Adjacent properties are primarily residential and undeveloped and include the following. l"" I I The City of Aspen is located approximately one mile northeast of the subject property. Castle Creek Road borders the subject property to the east. Further east, down a steep canyon, is Castle Creek which flows to the north. r r r The land to the south of the subject property is essentially undeveloped forested land. Similarly, most of the land to the west is undeveloped. Aspen Highlands Ski Area is located approximately one mile southwest of the subject property. To the northwest is the Aspen Valley Hospital facility. Immediately north of the subject property is the Castle Ridge Housing subdivision. Additional private residence buildings are located north and west of the subject property. Historic Conditions 'r' I r I Regional and site-specific historic documentation for the subject property including USGS and Pitkin County maps, aerial photographs, and Pitkin County Assessor's records were also reviewed in an effort to reconstruct the developmental history of the subject site and adjacent areas. Historic aerial photographs were reviewed at the U.S. Forest Service office in Aspen, Colorado. - I , , I August 1990 aerial photographs showed the developments surrounding the subject property to the.north and northwest were 80 to 90 percent completed in comparison with current conditions. The Castle Creek water treatment plant site appeared similar to present conditions. ..- , , I I .... I .1 July 1973 aerial photographs of the subject property and adjacent lands showed that the subject property appeared similar to present-day conditions, except that the maintenance building did not exist. The current transformer storage area was cleared of vegetation, but no signs of significant equipment storage were evident" from this photograph. 'i ! 'i , I , -3- T ! - - r- r r r 'I"" I I r I 'I"" I , , 'i , , r , , 'i i I .,.. I .,.. ! ~ .,. i , 1 ! 'T , " l' , " October 1939 black and white aerial photographs of the subject property and adjacent lands showed that the subject property was basically undeveloped except for two round buildings near the current maintenance shop. There was only one road on the subject property which led to the site from the south. REvmw OF REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASES Our investigation included, but was not limited to, a review of the following lists prepared and maintained by environmental regulatory agencies for the area around the subject site. These lists were searched for sites up to a one-mile radius of the subject property: . Underground Storage Tank (UST) list, July, 1994 list from the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section, . Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) list, October, 1994 list from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), . Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS), October, 1994 list from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), . Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) list, December, 1993 list from EPA, . Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) list, November, 1994, from EPA, . National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Syste!ll (NPDES) April, 1994, from EPA, . National Priorities List sites, Colorado, August, 1994, from EPA, and . Solid Waste Sites and Facilities list, December, 1994, from CDPHE. This regulatory list review was performed by Environmental Data Resources, (EDR) Inc. The EDR report is included as an attachment. A review of the above records from the EDR report and other sources of information revealed that no RCRIS or CERCLIS sites were identified on or near the subject property. No USTs or LUSTs were registered at or near the subject property. There were no records of any registered potentially hazardous materials stored hydrologically upgradient from the subject property from the data reviewed in the EDR report. -4- r r , r , r r CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Due to the size of the property and the presence of several feet of snow during WEI's site visit, a complete site reconnaissance was not possible for this assessment. However, all "accessible" areas, including areas of development and human activities, were inspected. The primary areas of concern regarding potential contamination are: 1. 2. 3. The electrical transformer storage area. The sediment trap and associated pond. The area near the historic ASTs. r I WEI recommends that a Phase II site assessment be performed to determine the extent of subsurface contamination on the subject property, if any. A combination of three methodologies described below is recommended for this Phase II assessment, in order to fully ascertain the extent of soil contamination at the subject property. Time constraints may alter these recommendations and we would be glad to discuss them with you at your request. r r Because the firm HP-Geotech is scheduled to drill on the site for geotechnical purposes, WEI recommends that borehole drilling for the proposed Phase II site assessment be coordinated with this firm. Drilling a minimum of three boreholes to initially characterize subsurface contamination is recommended. A preliminary cost estimate for a drilling Phase II investigation is outlined below: r I 'T'" I r r TABLE 1- PRELIMINARY COSTS FOR PHASE II DRILLING Description Estimated Costs Standard * Rush** Travel and Expenses $1000 Preliminary Site Preparation $ 200 Drill Rig Time for 3 proposed boreholes*** $1500 WEI field time $3000 Laboratory Analyses $2250 (EPA methods for PCBs, BTEX, TVH and TEH) Summary Report $500 'T'" I .... I, T I i \ \ Phase II Drilling Estimated Cost $6,950 $1000 $ 200 $1500 $3000 $3400 $500 $8,100 * ** *** Standard time to complete equals 4 weeks. Rush time to complete equals 1.5 - 2 weeks. HP Geotech proposes to bill the City of Aspen directly, therefore, drill rig costs are not included in the total estimate. T T -5- "!" I \ \ ,.. ,.. - Immediately following drilling (or on the same day if time is available), WEI would perform additional field tests to further characterize contamination on the site. This would be accomplished by performing a "Soil-Gas" analysis of subsurface soils. The soil-gas samplers must be buried in the ground for a minimum of seven days. The laboratory results from the Petrex samples would further define the areas of potential contamination and allow for more accurate drilling of potentially contaminated areas. ,.. - Petrex samplers with analysis cost approximately $200 each. WEI recommends that a grid pattern with 15 Petrex samplers be used. The total cost for the standard Petrex analysis would accordingly be approximately $3,000, not including WEI field time. ,.. Additional field testing in the electrical transformer storage area may be performed using the field test kits for PCBs. These tests cost approximately $50 each. WEI recommends that 20-25 samples be tested. Additionally, WEI would recommend sending a selected few of the "positive" soil samples to a laboratory for confirmatory analysis. Laboratory cost for PCB analysis is approximately $150 each. WEI recommends that three soil samples be sent to the laboratory for confirmatory analysis, totalling $450. - ,.. - If the Petrex results or the PCB field test results indicate significant contamination zones in areas outside of those in the initial drilling, it is possible that a follow-up drilling investigation would be recommended. WEI would be able to define the scope of this only after the initial results are obtained. The following is a preliminary cost estimate for the total Phase II site assessment. r- I TABLE 2 - PRELIMINARY COSTS FOR COMPLETE PHASE II SITE ASSESSMENT - Standard Rush r- I Drilling and Soil Testing Petrex Analysis 6,950 5000 8,100 6000 r r r Field Screening for PCBs and lab analysis 1450 1450 Interpretive Phase II report 3000 4000 TOTAL PHASE II COSTS $16,400 $19,550 r WEI would be glad to discuss these recommendations at your convenience. r r r J.~ f. ... I ... ... ... ... ... - "'" ... I I ... r I r r r r "" I -00\' ~ ,o~.. . . -. ,. i . . '. "._, . " .. '-, . " ~ . '.._,~... ..,",-:" \ " . \.._.: , l 1 " "\ ,... I WASTE ENGINEERING. INC. 2430 ALCOTT STREET DENVER, CO 80211 (303)433-2788 DRAWN DSS CHECK PRA DATE 4/95 SCALE 1" = 2000' FIGURE 1 LOCATION MAP 952-034.000 r f,: L.~ J,: J;.: ,l.; , ... I ... - ... r ... I r r r , T" ! r T T I ~ c:::J CASTLE RIDGE HOUSING GJ MAINTENANCE \\ I BUILDING \j o o WEST PLANT ,....--------- I TRANSFORMER " \ STORAGE AAf:A/ \o.~____---' BACKWASH POND 2 MG. CLEARWELL ,..r--, EAST ~ PLANT SEDIMENT .o'POND . . f ,/ I HISTORIC AST LOCATION '" ~~ NORTH NOT TO SCALE WASTE ENGINEERING. INC. 2430 ALCOTT STREET DENVER, CO 80211 (303)433-2788 DRAWN KAL CHECK PRA DATE 4/6/95 SCALE N.T.S. CITY COUNlY STATE JOB NO. ASPEN PITKIN COLORADO 952-034.000 FIGURE 2 SITE MAP CITY OF AspeN PROPERTY ,. , , , , -r' ..r I .... ..1." ,. .... I - , ... I - , .... - I I r r r r I r I r T I T I T I T , ACRONYMS . Above Ground Storage Tank (AST) . Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylene (BTEX) . Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) . Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) . National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) . National Priorities List (NPL) . Parts per Billion (Ppb) . Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) . Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) . Total Extractable Hydrocarbons (TEH) . Total Volatile Hydrocarbons (TVH) . Underground Storage Tank (UST) . United States Geological Survey (USGS) . Waste Engineering, Inc. (WEI) ,I.' ,.- ,... .l. ..1. , - ... - .- r r , I"'" I I r - 1 .1 'I"" , ! T I T I , T I I T T PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG City of Aspen Property 1. View of maintenance building at left and entrance to property. 2. View of gazebo where AST was historically located. 3. View of electrical transformer storage area. 4. View of transformer and location of one soil-PCB sampling site. 5. View of vehicle dumping sediment from street sweeping activities. 6. View of sediment trap/pond. 7. View of office for water treatment plant at south end of property. 8. View of water holding structure at treatment plant. , r ~ I ~ I. r r I. r ~ I. [ [ I L [ - t , r Ii: I l [ . , - )- ~ I " - l I L I r b [ r r r r n I[ [ [ [ ) - II , - t - t - L - f - l - L I r . .. - ~. - . t " '" . ~ .. I r r c r r i r r , '1 C r e [ l ~ f' 6 ~ I. r [; f ,. ';'r,.\.' ," " ~ '. 11::.. 4 ~ - j, [ - ( - 7. I r r n - I [ - L - L 8. Ii; - I . - i. - I - I - l - I ... - ... ... - ... ... i r r i r r r 2. r I ,.. I T "I'" .1 T 1. " , ~- ~ '"' 'C - - - - - 3. - - - I r I r r r r r r r r I 4. T r I ir -- ... ---- - 'f i.. \If"'-.... J . -..: ); , - .;... - - r- 5. r- !~ r r ,... I r 'i I 6. r i r I T I ,.. I I T T :1 ~. 'to 1" :~'I\ i \ li ~",,: . .... .... .... .... .... 7. - r r I , ... 'I I r r 'l"" I I 8. T , T , , ,.,. I I .... I ! i I 1 , , I f F ExhibitD I. i- I - , - ... EDR REPORT ... , ... .... ... ... ... ... - ,... - - I - I'"' I I ,... ... ,... ,... ,... ... The EDR-Radius Map with GeoCheck™. ~. ,... - ,... ,... Inquiry Number: 70698.3s ,... ... !\larch 13, 1995 ,... ,... I"'" i .. I"'" I I I"'" I I I I"" i ~ 1 ~~;~ronmental . : Resources, Inc . . : Creators of Toxicheck/(l\ The Source For Environmental Risk Management Data 3530 Post Road South port, Connecticut 06490 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 ... '. ... THE EDR.;.RADIlJS MAP™ ... The EDR-Radius Map'IM is a saeening fOOl which maps sites wilh potenlial or existing environmenlalliabililieS. Specified government dohholeS are searcbecI in eccordance wilh the ASTM Standard (E 1527) or ClISlDm . specifications provided by the user. The EDR -Radius Map'IM includes the following lhree maps: ... ... Topographic Map: .- . displays a two mile radius around the target pi operty . displays the United States Geological Survey (USGS) ~<lt-hic contours and selected road features (i.e.; major street names, and hydrographic data) ... Overview Map: . displays a one-niile (ASTM SllIIIdarcI) or ClISlDmer specified n1dius around the target p.Opo;Ily . includes ~or gq.OjIhic attn"butes available in EDR's COIIIpUta" mapping system (i.e., S1rcel names, available hydrography) ... Detail Map: ,... , . . I'"' .. ,... displays a quarter-mile radius or customer specified radius around lhe target property and provides lhe user with a close-up view includes all geographic attributes available in EDR's computer mapping system (i.e., street names, address ranges) helps the user locate "orphan" sites,those sites with insufficient address infonnalion such that they can only be identified as within the zip code, city, or county of the target property ... Please call EDR's Nationwide Customer Service at 1-800-352-0050 (8am - 8pm EST) with questions or comments about your report. ... Thank you lor your business! ,... Disclaimer ,- EDR makes no representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, quality or . completeness of any data provided by governmental or other entity used by EDR in the preparation of its reports. The customer shall take full responsibility for the use of EDR reports. No warranty of merchantability or of fitness for particular purpose, expressed or implied, shall apply and EDR specifically disclaims the makIng of any such warranties. In no event shall EDR be liable to anyone for special, incidental, consequential or exemplary damages. ... ,... I i' i .- i ... ... ... A 8NICh of available envIronm8nt8I records was conducted by Environmental Data RllSOllI'C8S, Inc. (EDR). 1he 8NICh met the specific requlrementa of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site ~8ms II8OllB, E'1S27.e4,lncIudlng lho8e8llllOClatedwilhgOll8hllll8l11a1 dslabases, search cflSl8nceSand cIala currency. 1he detailed EOR I8pDI1, dallld OO/1a19S, is Included 8S an appendix to this SUlIlI1l8Iy I9pOft. 1he address of the subject property for which the search was Intended is: 298 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET . ASPEN, CO 81611 No mapped sites were found In EDR's 8NICh of available ( .reasonably ascertainable .) govemment records ellher on the subject property or within the ASTM E-1S27.e4 search radius around the subject property for the following Databases: . RCRlS-TSD-______.__._______ Resaun:e Coneecvallon and RecOvery Infonnation System State Haz. Waste:.___....__.. CERCUS . . State LF:.___.________________ Solid Waste SItes & Facilities LUST:._.________________.___l.elIldng Underground SlllI8ge Tank"Ust RAATS:......_m_._____._____ RCRAAdmiisbative AeIion Tl1ICking System RCRIS SOG:._______________. fI8llOuICe eo. ..-.aIlon and Reoo.ery Infonnation System HMlAS:.______._____.____.___ HazaIdous MatarIaIs Information Reporting System PADS:.___________.____._____. PCB Aclivlty Database System ERNS:......__...._______.... Emergenoy Response Notification System TRlS:._m..__m.._______._.. Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System NPL Llens:'_____..__m____.. Federal Superfund Uens TSCA:.____._m___mm__... Toxic Substances Control Act ... ... ... ... ... ... !"'" Unmapped (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. Search Results: Search results for the subject property and the search radius, are listed below: ... Subject Property: ... The subject property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. ... - ... ... !"'" r I TC70698.3s r ! - - ,... Sunoundlng Properties: Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the subject property are In the left hand column; those with a ~ elevation are In the right hand column. Page numbers refer to the EOR RacflUS Map report (atlached as an appendix) where detailed dala on incfMdual sites may be reviewed. SItes IIsled in bold It1II1cB are in multiple dalabPses NPL: Also known as Superfund, theNalional Priority List c:t~bese isa subset of CERCUS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund program. The source of this database is the U.s. EPA. A review of the NPllist, as provided by EDR, and dated 1l!/16/1994 has reveaJed that there is 1 NPl site within appruxImately 1 Mile of the subject property. ,... ,... Equal/Hlgher Elevatlon Page I Lower Elevation Page . - ,... - CERCUS: The COlllplllhellsl\19 EnviIDI"IIllllIlal Respollee, Compensation and Uability Infonnation System contains infonnation on sites Idenlified by the United States Environmental Protaclion Agency (U.S. EPA) as known or suspected abandoned, inactive or unoontrolled hazardous waste sites that may require cleanup. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA. A review of the CERCUS fist, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there is 1 CERCUS site within approximately 0.5 Miles of the subject property. EquallHlgher Elevation PlIge I Lower Elevation Page I"'" - - UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subfille I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The source is the State Oil Inspector's Offrce's Tank Ust A review of the UST list, as provided by EOR, and dated 04/01/1994 has revealed that there is 1 UST site within approximately 0.25 Miles of the subject property. I"'" Equal/Higher Elevation Page Lower Elevation Page 4 - ASPEN RANGER STATION - RCRIS: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act database includes selected information on sites that generate, store, treat, or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Act. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA. - A review of the RCRIS-LQG list, as provided by EDA, and dated 11/30/1994 has revealed that there is 1 ACRIS.LOG site within approximately 0.25 Miles of the subject property. equal/Higher Elevation Page I Lower elevation Page - ,... I I ,... I I TC70698.3s r , , ,... ,... ,... PITI<lN COUNTY RESOURCE RECOVER GRIZZlY RESERVOIR CHEVRON USA INC CITY OF ASPEN STREET DEFT ASPEN TRUCK MAINTENANCE CDOH . ASPEN RENTALCAR FUel FAClUTY Due 10 poor or inadequate addless Information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name """'''''M(s) SMUGGLER MTN SUPERFUND SITE CERCUS,F1NOS,NPL RCRI$-l..QG Slats LF WST WST WST UST UST UST ,... ,... .,- ,... ,... ,... .... ,... " ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... I"" I I, !"" , , I ,.. I , I TC70698.:ls ,.. GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEAftCHEDI DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ... To malnll1in c:unency 01 the foIowlng fedenII end stale databases. EDR CXll1I8Cls the approprtate _,_ egency on a monthly 01' qu8l1afly baals, as raqulr8d. ... EIapaed ASTM days: PnMdaa conflnna1lon ihat 1I1ls EDR report..- 01' exceeds1he 9CkIay upd8lIng ~ 01 the ASTM _anl. ... ... FEDERAL ASTM RECORDS: CERCUS: Complahensll/8 EnvIronmental Responae, CompensatIon. end UabIIty Information ~ SoulCa: EPA/NTlS Tatephone: 703-416.0702 CERCUS: Comp/ehensIve EnvIronmenl8l Respon8ll, Compensation and Uablllly Inlolm81lon~. CERCUS c:ontaIns Infonnationon sIlas_ by the USEPA as known orsuspecl abandoned. inac:lMl oru'lCOolb,)lh,d hazarlIous _ silas which may raquIr8 cleanup. Date 01 Gowlmmant VenIon: 11W31194 Date 01 Date AnIvaIat EDR: 12/16/94 Date Made _ at EDR: 01/30/95 EI8psacI ASTM days: 45 ... ... ... ERNS: emergency Respon8ll Nolfic:atlon Syslem SoulCa: EPA T8lephone: 202-260-2342 ERNS: Dnargancy ResponI8 NotiIkAdlo.. Syslem. hazanIous SltI$l8nC88. Date 01 Gowlmmant Version: 1'131/93 Date Made _ at EDR: OS/2SJ94 ERNS rec:cxds end _ infonn8lIon on AIpOI1ed......aaas 01 011 end ... Date 01 Date AnIvaIat EDR: 04/11194 Elapsed ASTM days: 44 ... NPL: National Priorily US! Soorce: EPA Telephone: 703-603-8852 NPL: National Priorities US! (Superfund). The NPL Is a subset of CERCUS and ldentil..s over 1,20() sites for priority deanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. All such, tt Is EDR's polley 10 plot NPL sites greater 1I1an approxlmately 500 acres In slze as areas (polygons). Sltes smaller In size are poInt-geocoded at 1I1e site's address. ... Date of Government Version: 12116/94 Date Made Active al EDR: 01/30/95 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/21/94 Elapsed ASTM days: 40 ... RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Soorce: EPAlNTlS Telephone: 202.260.3393 RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. RCRIS includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/O< dispose of hazardous waste as defined by 1he Resource Conservation and Recovery ""-(RCRA). Date of Government Version: 1 1/30/94 Date Made Active at EDR: 02114/95 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12119/94 Elapsed ASTM days: 57 ... ... ... ... r , I""' ! i ... .... FEDERAL NON-ASTM RECORDS: .... FINDS: FIIdIIy Index System Scxmle: EPA/NTIS Telephone: llOO-908-2493 FINDS: Fdly Index System. FINDS conlaIne bolh fac:IIIy Inlonn8llon Illd .jlClIl,lb.~ to Olher lIlUlQlS 1hal contaln men _ lllese Include: RCRIS, PCS (PermIt CompIanoe SysIem). AlAS (Aetome1llc InIormatIon RelrtevlII Syslem). FATES (FlFRA (Fe$rIllnseclIc:Ide FungIclde Rodenliclde AdI- TSCA EnIoIcemenl System. FITS (FIfRAITSCA TIlIddng SystemD, CERCUS. DOCKET (Enforcement Doc:keIused to manage Illd 1IaCk lnIorma1lon on c:IvI judIc:laI enfol_~ ~ lor.. _"'_ _). FURS (Feder8I Uhdelll'ound InjecIIon Control). FADS (Fedenll ReportItw;l Data Syslem). SlA ~ ~). CtCIS (TSCA ChemIcIIa In ConInle<<:e lnfonn8Ilon Syslem), PADS. RCIlAoJ (medical W8Slo 1r8napOIIe.f/d_1'8). TRlS Illd TSCA. Dale of GoYemment Version: 09/14/93 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/13/95 .... ... .... PADS: PCB Activity Database SysIem Source: EPA Telephone: 202.260-$92 PADS: PCB ActivIty 0atlIllaM PADS IdenllIles ~8, lran.por...6, commen:IaI -1lId[or blllkera Illd disposers of PCll'I who are required lD notify lhe EPA oflUCh lIClMties. Dale of GoYemment VersIon: 07/11194 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/20195 .... ... RAATll: flCRA Adm!rlIslrdve Acllon Trac:tdng Sysleni Scxmle: EPA Telephone: 2lJ2.!I64.4104 RAATS: IlCflAAdmlnIlfttlon Acllon TlIIClcIng SysIem. FlMTS<l..........1IlClClIII8 t.eedOll..r..__dona IeaIlld ~ IlCflA perlMo/tlg lD mljor ~ Illd Includes 8dmt.""".......1lld c:lvllIdlonI braughtbylhe EPA. Dale of GoYemment Version: ~194 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/01/95 ~ ... TRIS: TOldc Chemicsl Release InventorY System Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 202.260.2320 TRIS: Toxlc Release In..ntory System. TRIS IdenItlies lacIllties which release toldc chemicals to the air. water and land In repoI18ble quan1l1ieS under SARA TItle III Section 313. Date of Govemmenl Version: 12/31/92 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 10/02/95 ... ... TS,CA: Toxlc Substances Control Act Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 202.260.1444 TSCA: Toxlc Substances Control Act. TSCA IdenUlles manufacturers and Impol1ers of c:hemicsl substances Included on the TSCA Chemical Substance In..ntorY IIsl h Includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. USEPA has no cunent plan to update and/or ....Issue this database. Date of Government Version: 05/15/86 Date 01 Next Scheduled Update: 03/27/95 ... ... HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Inlonnation Reporting System Source: U.S. Depat1ment of Transportation Telephone: 202.366-4555 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Incident Report System, Date of Govemment Version: 06/30/94 HMIRS contains hazardous material spill Incidents reported to DOT. Date of Next Scheduled Update: 05/02/95 ... NPL UENS: Federal Supertund Uens Source:EPA Telephone: 202.260-3733 NPL UENS: Federal Superfund Uens, Under the authorhy granted the USEPA by the eomprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Uablllty Act (CERCLA) Of 19BO,the USEPA has the aulhorhy to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of pOtential liability. USEPA oompiles a listing of filed notices 01 Superlund Liens. oafe of Government Version: 10/15/91 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/18/95 """ r ! """ I I """ i i ~. ... - STATE OFc:oLORADO ASTM REOClRDIk UJST: LeIldng Undergl\llIllI S1Inge Tank LilIl Soun:e: Oepanmenl Of He8llh Telephone: 303-692-3450 LUST: l.ellldng UndergfIlUIld S1Inge Tenk IncIdenl Reports. LUST rec:orIls CCllI8ln en IrMllllDly 01 reponed leaking unde<gIound IloIage _incidents. Not en_ malnlaln _ RlCOIlla. and lhe InIon11I111On _ _ by_. Da1Il of GoYemment VeraIon: 10/01/94 Da1Il of Dala ArrIval at EDR: 1~ Dale Made AaNe at EDR: 01/30/95 Elapsed ASTM days: 56 . . ....-;.,. .... .... SHWS: CERCUS Source: Dep8l1m8llt of Heallh Telephone: 303-692-3300 SHWS: Sl8le H8ZlIIlfolls _ SIte$. Sl8le hazatdous waste slle rec:ords ere the states' equlvalenllO CERCUS. These aItes may or may not alnlady be hled on the federal CERCUS Iisl. PrloltIy aItes planned lor cleanup using _ funds (_ equtvalenl Of Superlundl ere Idehllfted along wtlh aItes whale de8IIlp wi! be paid for by poIenlIalIy reaponsIble par1Ies. Available information _ by_. Date of GOYenvnent V8l1iOll: 1lli31/94 Om Made AaNe at EDR: 01/30/95 om oC Dala Antv8I at EDR: 12[16{94 EIap8IllI ASTM days: ~ ... - ... SWf/LS: Solld Waste SlIes & Fadllties Source: Oepanmenl Of HeallI1 Telephone: 303-692-3432 SwFJLS: Solld WUleI'8c:lllletllan SlIes. SWF/LS type _1ypIClIlIyoontllln.. .,""llOl,G aoId_~ IacIIlIetI or la_In a PIflk:uI. _. Dependlnll on the _.lhe8e may be aclIw or....... fac:lIIIeaor open dUmps lhal faIed 10 meeI RCRA Secllon 2004 ClllIlIIa lor aoIId _1andftI1a or d1oposa1 aItes. Da1Il of GOYemment Version: 1~1/94 Dale oC Dala Arrival at EDR: 01/05/95 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/14/95 Elapsed ASTM days: 40 .- i .... UST: Tank Ust Source: State Oillnspecto(s Office Telephone: 303-289.5644 UST: Registered UI1derground Storage Tanks. usrs sre regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and RecoveI)' Act (RCRAI and must be registered with the stale depanment responsible for administering the UST program. Available infonnation varies by state program. Dale of Government Version: o.w1/94 Date Made Active at EDR: 11/02i94 Da1Il of Data Arrival at EDR: 09/02/94 Elapsed ASTM days: 61 ... - - Historical and Other Database(s) ... Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gasl5ltes: The existence and location of Coal Gas slles Is provided exclusively to EDR by Real Property Scan, Inc. CiCopynght 1993 Real Property Scan. Inc. For a technical description of lhe types of hazards which may be found at such sites. contact your EDR customer service representative. ... Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan. Inc. The infonnation contained in this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly available sources produced by entities other than Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy ollhis report. Real Property Scan does not guarantee the accuracy of this report. Any liability on the part of Real Property Scan is strictly limited to a refund of the amount paid. No daim is made for the actual existence of toxins at sny site. This report does not constitUte a legal opinion. ... r I I r I"" I r- ... _~"........doIl:1l1eNallonll~ Dol" rll...._ del. !1cpedbyllleU.s. En...ill...... "'..........,~ (USEPA) 8tId Is acomplllllall Qllhe EPA/Slate Auldenhl A8dan Surwy andllle NalIonaf ftn'~. .... AalIoI\SUnIey. 1l1e Iludy _1Ile ,...,. -,tlll2. ~ necefS8lydala.... been ~lloCIbylnlormallon coIIeded atprtva!e __IUCII aa umenll1les 8I1d reaeaR:l11nsdlulfons. ... ..., FADS: Feder8f RepoI1lng DalI System Source: EPA/OlIl(:e QI DIlnIdng W_ FADS pIllVIdea lnIorm11l1alll1l9ardlng public waterlUpplles 8I1d 1heIr c:ompIIance wI1h moni1Dring requI_ll1lIldmum . conIlIrIllnant lewfa (MCl"~ 8I1d Olher lllQUfreme.... oIlhe Safe Drtnklng water Acl Of 1986. 0l1/GM PlpeI~~..1on Unes: 1l1iIdala was oblslIllld by EDR from.... USGS In 1994. fila reIemld 10 by USGS.. GeoOaIa DigIIII Una Graphs from':100~ Mapa. flwas elllnlCllld from lhe 1r8I1SpOlla1iOn category inc:IudIng ....... oI~ but primartly gas plpellnesand eIeclrICII ""'lSITIlaalan lnes. ... ... San8fllve Receptors: ThaIe nlndMduals who. due 10 1helr flaglle Immune ayalema, 8/ll deemecllD be 8$peCIII1y sensiIIve 10 erwlrooomenlllclllChllgel. n- typlcIIIylncludellle elderly.... alclc, 8tId ChIIdAIn. WhIle lhe 8ll8Cl1ocll1lon ol1hlSllllt1llltiOle ftlOIIlIOrI _not be _rmlned. EDA .ldIc6... _ facllllea. auc:h aa ac:hooIa.l1oIphaIa, day CIII8 cemera. 8I1d hlI1ling homes. _ ..........1\lOIflIOI'I....1kefy 10 be IocaIed. USGS WaterWella: In ~ 1971lhe United Slale8Qeologlca1 Surwy(USGS) ImpIeIllllll1lld a 1IIIIon8l_1llIClUII:e InIonn8llon ~ ayatam. ThIs_base 00Ill8InII db.........'" lnIDrmallon on ....whenlllle USGS~or""colIacIIld dlla on 1UIfaoI_lltWI/or g<oundwIIer. The grounclwlllllr dlla ~ lnIormaIIon on Illlll'Illhln 900.000 _15, aprtnga, 8nd _sauroasofgtllU~, . Flood ZOne DlIla: ThIs dati, -.blain eeIecl COlM1lIee _lhe CllUllIIY;- obtained by EDA In 1994 from lhe FedanII Enwl/V6ncy MMagen1enl Agatw:y (FEMA). 0aIa d8pIcIa l00.,ut and llClO.,ear lIood _ as defined by FEMA. ... - ... ... 1IiiOiri: ... ... ... ... ~ ... jO;i.;l ... ... ... ... ... - ... \'IIie;. !"'> ... ... ... , ... ... ... ... ... r- I , !'" ! 1'"' ... , '~:'(:" . GEOLOGIC AGE IDEHTlFICATlONt GeologIc Code: Eta: System: Sertes: fIOCl( STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT Ygl PnlcImbrian Prec:ambrian 0dIr Y granI1lc rocks CaIIlgoIy: PIulDnIe and In1ruslve Rocks GROUNDWATER FLOWfNFORMATION GeI1ItBI TlIflOlIlIIpI1/cGnldlent GenII8l Nonh GeI1ItBI HydrogaolOgfc Gillilan!: no hydrogeologic d"'" avaIlallle. Hole: In a genend way, lhe _lIIlIe typlcaI1y conlonna1O lUlfaoa 1OpOgI aphy.* FEDERAL DATABASE WELL INfORMATION WELL QUADRANT EISl DISTANCE FROM TP 1/2.1 Mile .DEPTH TO I.fTIfOLOGY WATER TABLE Setttmentary (1Il1lI1If8flll1llatecf) 59 It. AREA RADON INFORMATION PITKIN COUNTY, CO Number Of sites tested: 28 Area % <4 pCVL 48% 38% % 4.20 pCVL 'l3% 54% % ~20 pCVL Average Ac:tMty Uvlng Area Basement 3.820 pCl/L 3.310 pCIfL 1.1% 8% PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION Seard1ed by Nearest Well. Location Relative to TP: PWS Name: 1/2 . 1 Mile East KRABLDONIK P.O. BOX 5517 SNOWMASSVILLAGE. C081615 Well currently has or has had major violation(s): No tScMt:e:P.G.~. A.E.AmdtIfldW.J. 8awMe.G<t'*'Wd"~US.a11:2.SCO.OOOScale'Ad~~IftcnClC"'1l'14 ".6. klng.andtUl. ee;lmantAlp.USGSOigi\III o.ars...OOS'11 (1",,). t;U.S.EPAGfo)ftCIW_HandboolI.Vdt.GIIIUMlW_Md~.OffceofAesoNrCh"""~ep~*16ll.~~.NQe.78.$ej:Mfttler1tllO. TC70698.3s Page 1 of 1 r . T I -, ~ " 1 , ! . . / I /'/ ,- - Indicates TARGET PROPERTY. . Indicates environmental sites at elevations higher fhan or equal to the target property. - Indicates environmental sites at elevations lower fhan the target property. - Coal Gasitica1lon Sttes (If requested) - National Priority Us! Sttes I , I I I I I i I J----...... . .... , ......"'-..., \\" I I 1 I " ... "....... ".;/< o I 1/4 f 1/2 I Wiles . ~ ... ...J !I . Power transmission fines (USGS DLG, 1993) Iv! - Oil & Gas pipefines (USGS DLG, 1993) .... CUSTOMER: CONTACT: INQUIRY It: DATE: Waste Engineering, Inc. Paul Avant 70698.3s March 9, 1995 l TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS: , CITYISTATEIZlP: lAT/LONG: ... r MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY SHOWING AlL SITES r Search Taftlel OiSlanOe Total Database Property (MUes) <1/8 1/8 . 1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2-1 >1 PIolled r NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 1 0'1'" RCRlS-TSD UlOO 0 0 0 0 NR 0 I I State Haz. Waste 1,000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ! r CERCUS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 1 ,! State Landfill 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 T WST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 UST 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ~ ! RCRIS Sm. Ouan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 ,! RCRIS 19. Ouan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 1 ,. ! HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 "!" I ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ANDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 1 "i" , I TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 NPl Uens TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 "'" I TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Coal Gas N/A N/A N/A NJA N/A N/A N/A "t ! TP - Target Property 1 NR - Not Requested at this Search Distance . Sites may be listed in more than one database , I .,.. , I I ... I I ...,. i '1 I TC70698.3s Page 1 of 4 l ... -' MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY SHOWING ONLY SITES HIGHER THAN OR THE SAMEa.EVA11ON AS TP - Search T8Iget Distance Total Database Property (Miles) <1/8 1/8 . 1/4 1/4 .1/2 1/2 .1 >1 PIolIed .... NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ,-- RCRIS-TSO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Slate Haz. Waste 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 - CERCUS O.soo 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Slate Landfill O.soo 0 0 0 NR NR 0 - LUST O.soo 0 0 0 NR NR 0 UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 - MATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 .... RCRIS [.g. Ouan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 r ERNS TP NA NR NA NA NR 0 I FINDS TP NR NR NA NR NR 0 ,... ! TRlS TP NR NA NR NR NR 0 ! NPL Uens TP NA NR NR NA NR 0 ,.. , TSCA TP NR NR NA NR NR 0 I Coal Gas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A T TP - Target Property !'" . NR - Not Requested at this Search Distance . Sites may be listed in more than one database ""!' I I ""l- I I .... - - TC70698.3S Page 2 of 4 .,..,. - _ID DIreclfon DIsIanoa Devatlon Slla - . MAP FINDINGS EDA ID Number Dalabasa(S) EPA ID Number - Coal Gas SIIa Search: EDR doea not _enlly _ coal g.a _'nfonnetlon available In thla _e. CERCUS ClassIfic:a1ion D8f8: S/Ia lncident CIIfegory. MINES(TAlUNGS Federal FaclIlty: NO OwnershIp Ste1us: OTHER NPL SIaIus: CURRENTLY ON THE FINAL NPL EPA Notes: ZN.P8.CO,CONTAM.IN OlD MINE. TAlUNGS, BLOWING DUST,GROUND AND SURFACE WATER CONTAM. HAS -33.12 IN 3/84. NPLSITE APPROlt 110 ACRES, NEAR ASPEN COLO. CERCUS....n a f i6f1t Histoty: ....", .oent SCREENINGSfTEINSPECT1QN AasSB! nent Ds:ovEAYo Als~ 5S .tent PRalMINAAY ~SS~.ENT A II! 1I ,oent ANAL LISTING ON NPL ~1I1" loent PROPOSAL TONPL ASSBssment REMOIALACTION Ass! l! ..ent REMOVAL ACTION CERCLIS Site Status: This slte Is currently under InveSllgalion by.... government to assess the extent of ful1her action CERCLlS AHas Namels): ASPEN NPl.: 10: 08C0020 Date Usted: 6/10/86 (FINAL) EPA/ID: COD9808062n Hoz. Rani< Score: 31.31 Status: USTED ON NPL Rank: 929 Group: 19 Ownership: Private Permtt: Not reported Site Activities: Mining Si1e, Subsurface Stte Condition: Damage of F1ora1Fauna Stte Condition: Contamination of Soil Sne Condition: Contam. Ground Water Sne Condition: Contam. Drinking Water Waste Type: MetalS Waste Type: Mine Tailings Waste Fonn: Not reponed Contaminant Media Affected: CADMIUM (CD) Ground Water ZINC AND COMPOUNDS, NOS (ZN) Ground and Surface Water IRON AND COMPOUNDS, NOS (FE) Surface Water MANGANESE AND COMPOUNDS, NOS (MN) Surface Water LEAD (PS) Not reported i'- NPL Region SMUGGLER MT1II SUPERFUND SITE SPRUCE ST ASPEN, CO 81611 - ~ - - r- I r r I i ! ., .,... ! I .... , ! " .... i I l' l - .- CERCUS 1000234566 FINDS COOge08u6o<~( NPL RCRIS.LOG Cornilleted: Complef8d; CompleIed: CompIelsd: Compleled: CompIeled: Completed: 12101/84 CXW1J83 12101/84 06/01186 10/15/84 09/17/86 08/22191 TC7069B.3s Page 3 of 4 - - ,... ,... ,... .... - - ~ r r 1'"' I I i I .,.. i , "I'" I ,! 'T' .1 T I '"I" I , , ,.,. ! ! M.p1D Dhcllon Dlal8nOI EIeYatIon SIte 1 NNE 1/8.1/4 Lower MAP FlNDlNGS EDA ID Number ' ~S) EPA ID Number SMUGGLEIl MTN SUPERFUND SITE (ContInued) 01_ to nearest Papulation: Pcpul8IIon ""'*' a 1 Mia R~1us: Pcpul8IIon _ I 2 Mile RacIlua: Pcpul8IIon ""'*' 84 Mis R~lua: Ver1IeaIllisWlCa 10 AquHer: Ground W81Ir Use: OIstanceto nearest Surface Water: RCRIS: Owner: US E.P.A. (999) 999 9999 ContactPAUI.A SCHMITTDIEL (303) 293-1527 _ Oullnlhy Info Source 1000234566 Not reponed 3.00110 10,000 People Not reponed Mole..... 10.000 People Not reponed NO! Used as 0rInldng Water, AJtemaIlve Source Available NO! reponed Wasfe Quantlly Info Source NodflcaIfon ??oo Not ftlllClr!Id NoIIIIca1fon DOO6 Not IllPClIted DOO8 Not ftlllClr!Id NolIftc:alfon Olher Perllnenrl:mt1Cnmental AclIvfly kleo_ 81 SIte: eMI judlclal W admInlstra1lve en~ caaes agains1 lacIIlty ASPEN RANGER STATION 806 W. HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 UST: Facility 10: FadlityTel: Age: Date Installed: Date Closed: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner Tel: Status: ConstllJClioo: Tank Capacity: Tank Chemical: Tank 'D: Facility Type: TOf8I Tenks: Date I..8sl Used: Owner 10: 0002258 (303) 945-3274 Not reponed Not reported Not reported U.S,F.S. . WHITE RIVER DIST. P.O. BOX 948 GLENWOODSPRINGS, C081602 303.945.2521 Owner Type: PennanenUy 0uI of Use Removed from Ground 12-01-60 Steel UNK Gasoline UST u0000868n N/A 1 Federal Non.Mifilary 1 1.2101/1960 5558 , Federal TC70698.3s Page 4 of 4 - . . . ........ . Q . I i- . f f! . c ,... ~ . ... . . ( ~ . ~ I"" ~ ~ Ii i ... ! z 8: li: I gj ,... J i !!i ~ !... ..~ i i ~ ~I - - -- - ;ic;; l!! - -- - .. ...... .... - > a: ~ '"' ::> .. z ! a. ... a: I 0 , - r r r I r - I ! I ".. I ! I"'r' I ! 1 "T , , j < !! co III c:i ~ ~ a: l=iC\l% ifi a:ClO~ w d . >::z:: a:tIII a: :EC:z o~ !z: lll~o ~~i~ ~i~ ~ ..... a: l UI (I) ::;OO-,;!;~U1t;~!<::: - < W::z:"'O ~O:E. OWCf);: ~~WO::>t-e ~~~f~~i _C\l_(I)(I)i!\lco .. ~ z .. : U) II: W ~ 15 '" lrl ~ t:c a: z ~u.~ ~~ ~ ...a: ....ICC a:~ tH~ ~~ _ z a:::> V~ O;c(JI-U> ...J~ ~:t~CI)z ~ w:.:::affi$zu.~ ffig:;)3;a:~~~ a:a::%<w~oo ~l-iU.5.....JO Nffi>O",,,,;!i!: t>!o.w>::>Oz:O: a:cn:t:t::::::EOwt: O<0000a:a. ~I O~G)ChCO"'''''O ~ :~fm m ~! ~ ~ c; 8 c; C;::.: i" 8 g 08QO~ 88 Ci) ::di) (0 _ ~ U) ~ o ZZ%ZZZZZ wwwwwwww o..a..a.a..a..a.c..a. cntnCJ)C/')(f.)cnooC/') <<<C<<<<C<C 1""';, .;~:~:\:':<, ::~~. " ;~:'~:,~:' :~:}i~:~ ~,.~,!<..,,>.ti:. ~;:;,""~.,,:':"":":' "::r..': .... - - - I""' ... - ,.... r r I .... I I r 1" I - ! I ! ~ I , T T I ., "I" I , . . " : ~. ~::'. . :':': Code ??oo 0006 0008 ~'.'~}~':";:fht~;:;i~:~; Description .........'.".''''..'.....'''.'''''''.'''';;7'....-''''''''_..'.'..... ,;}:epAWi's '~".C6a";'-AaClenCiu;"""'~;'~: ,;: .' ':)<::~..'::'" :':;';:;!~':~~~~::<'.l~~f:'~i!':i~::':i~~ .;~~1~~:.~~~: .;.. ';'~. NOT OEANEO CADMIUM LEAD TC70698.3s . Page 1. of 1 ,... ,... ,... ,... "" - ,... - - i I r r r J 'I"" i :1 "" - I , " - " T 1 '"I' ! I , . ,",' :. :< GEOCHECKVERSlON2.1ADDENDUM':;1';m~'i$';" ~y;~:, . "';"';:~:;;::; ~i~:~~;:: t~~E~~~~~j~~;~N~"~~~t:"~~'~:':>"~::~:"':"\->l,..~{.i~' Well CIoaeallO Target Propefly (East Quadrant) 8ASfC WELL DATA SIIe 10: SIIe Type: ye... Con81lucfed: - Well DepIh: IlepIhlOW8Ie(T_: Date MeaSUf8d: 391113106490301 Dlslance from TP: 1/2 -, Mile Single well.OlhIr lhM cdlecfor or Ranney type 1960 County: PIUcln 71130.00 It. State: CoIollllo 159.00 It. TopographlcSelflng: AlkMalormarlne_ 59.00 It. PrIm. Use 01 SIte: WIlhdrawalof_ 10011973 Prim. Use of Water. Public supply LI111OI.OGIC DATA Geologie Age ID (ErslSys1em/SerIes): Principal I..llhoIOgy 01 UnIt Furlher DeacoIlAlM: CatlO2Dio-Quatem8lY-HoIocene Secllmentllry (undlfterenlialed) Not Reponed WATER LEVEL VARIABIUTY WaterLevel: 59.86 It. Dale MeasurecI: 1.0/03(13 Water Level: 69.65 It. , Dale Meatullll: 08/11m Water l.eWl1: 61.13 It. Date Measured: 08/21/81 Water Level: 65.00 It. Date MllISUllld: 10/16/74 WIIIIlr Level: Not Reponed Date Meaaullll: 09/05/18 Water Level: 59.73 It. Date Measured: 08/2S/82 Water l.eWl1: Date M8lISUI8d: water Level: Date MeaSUf8d: 58.62 It. 09/W15 68.35 It. 10(09(79 Water Level: Dale MeuuI1II: Water~ Dale MeuuI1II: TC7069B.3s Page 1 of 2 60.65 It. 09/09176 58.16 It. 08/26Ill0 - - ,... ~ - - - - r r r 'r'" ! .1 'I'" ! i I - , , I ! ,.,. I , I 1 1 .., ! ! --.- _. _...._- i: :,::(i. ,~".;::.: '.:':;':':';'1';::,:,"':E.'QE' IvoUE"'C"'K's.!"";-srON2.' 1." "".,.1<.;'(:1*1.' ',J:>",x: '"'" '''':''.' ...,'. .,.. ,i:sr ..:.;u;;....~......l.., "l<...;Jid!. "-of" ",., ,~y~ ,....-.rI. '. '. .' . ..t:.<..;,;.'i:i!"';!L:'~".t'-f:"I"-"~~' ...- ..... '.' . '.';"I.zrl~'~h->C\::\"'~_'~ ;"':po..~t'~~;.~..J.t:t;""-'~""""'-:'''''$O';'.,'~.::.e.ulll.'. ,,~.'Il1.i~.'II "'.." ,....:,.... .~~~-l,..:-:':l'..:~,..i',,;..,.: ,,' . .t~,.._.. " .....:?'''"':<<.:.:.. . BU C'W""""" . DaI.' .. . t N A'. ON """.<;fl.':'"", .."....... ". ....'...1.:.rl1'.1:....-,....... '" ,'1.-0 l[;,#,:Jo!'I" "'" ..,.','(:<'......, ,,,'.y........ "~.~ - .:::,e;,.~.~'~.';A.. .'~.....-;."".".,.:..<~.~ . .~~<<~ .;;,:: ,'.;.., .R)Po."~,~~~;...:jf'..'e:.-J<;I:",."h;!l'.i.,,.:l.""~'~I..,,~~~ll. .o!U.I,;~:-:i~,..:/.,?~~... ~~i:"'>': A(', '.:' . '. """~.'~"'. ....'". ,..- "" .,"'"-,,.. ,~~'.','~':II "<.. ..... !';. .,.:1~1c:;.;.~,.r.:~_ ........ ..\,.".:*....N_'iIl<rl.......,'~~':~..'"''<l.:~. ~/'...>..;l'!.~ ,,' .,.....i!..:.,~~.u,:;. ... . Sean:fllld by Nelnlll Well PWS SUMMARY: PWSfD: D1r_1O TP: PWS Name: COO248455 PWS StaIua: Enl Date Inlllated: KRABLDONIK P.o. BOXS517 SNOWMASS Y1UAGE, CO 81615 Add_{ Fac:Illy Type: Nol Reponed Fac:Illy Name: Not Reponed Fac:Illy LalItude: Chy SeMel: T_C1aas 3911 24 Not Reponed: Nol Reponed Well currently has or has h~ major Wl/8llon(a,: No :~:,.~:. - June {1977 DilIlanoe from TP: 1/2 -1 Mile Date Deactivated Not Reported FacilIty Longlfude: 106 49 06 Popul8llon SeMld: Not Reponed: TC70698.3s Page 2 of 2 -, --.._-_._-_.~--, MAY. -01'95(MON} J6:55 WRIGHT WATER ~. TEL:303 480 1020 " - ,.... CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM - TO: eris Caruso City of Aspen - Engineering Department .... FROM: Paul Avant RE: Update of Phase II Site Asse.c:m,."t Results - Date: May I, 1995 r r r r r This memorandum summari2es the field investigations and analytical results to date for the City of Aspen property at the Castle Creek Water Treatment Plant. Waste Engineering, Inc, (WEI) perfonned the Limited Authorized Phase n field investigations at the site on April 14, 1995. Three areas were the focus of this investigation: 1. The eleetrica11ransfonner stonge area, 2. The water/sediment pit used for disposal by City street- sweeping vehicles, and 3. The location of two historic above-ground storage tanks (ASTs) which have bee.n removed from the site, r I r I ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER STORAGE AREA The electrical transformer storage area is situated northeast of the main,...,.,,,.....oe shop and is within the area for proposed housing development. Numerous electrical transfonners are scattered throughout this area. The transformers' estim.ted ages range from 20 years to very new (i.e, I to 2 years old). r ! r I WE! collected ten surficial soil samples within the electrical transformer storage area. Field test kits were used to screen for possible polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) soil contJlmin>\tion from leaking transformers. Three "positive" test kit soil samples and one - "negative" sllmple were sent to Phoenix Analytical Labs in Broomfield, Colorado for confirmatory analysis. All four samples were below detection limit for PCB contents. The positive re-"t1i"gs from the field test kits may have been caused by chlorinated compounds other than PCBs. Phoenix Labs is cwrently reviewing the lab reports to determine if any other regulated chlorinated compounds such as solvents were present in these samples. r I , r r 1 'i I 1 P.002 c5 z - .. C Z - Ie III &II Z - C Z III III t- en ; MAY. -01' 95 (MON) 16:55 WRIGHT WATER .... TEL:303 480 1020 P,003 .... Cris Caruso Page 2 - .... The PCB contents of the individual transformer units were not investiilUCd by WEI. In the event of tranSformer disposal, each transformer is required to be tested for PCB contents. The PCB contents will dictate the proper disposal method, WE! recommends that any trlIn.5formcrs which have not been tested for PCB contents be tested to determine their regulatory status. - - WATER/SEDIMENT PIT r I Tht water/sediment pit is used by City of Aspen street-sweeping vehicles for disposal of stormwater and sediment The pit is approximately 800 square feet in dimension. The water within the pit is estimated to be three to four feet deep, with six-foot banks to top of ground. WE! drilled two boreholes at the upgradient lI!1d downgradient end of the pit. Soil samples were tested in the field for organic vapors. The soil sample with the highest OVM reading was sent to the lab for analysis of me I-related compounds lI!1d metals. All metals were found to be below detection limits, with the exception of barium which was found at a level far below the regulatory limit. Fuel-related compounds were also primarily below detection limits. Those compounds which were detected were in compliance with remedial action category (RAe) level I limits. This is the most stringent category the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment uses when the soils are in contact with groundwater that can be used for municipal water supply. r r r r I 1"" \ A sediment sample for the bottom of the pit was also analyzed for fuel-related compounds lI!1d metals, The analytical results were very similar to those for the borehole sample. No hazardous levels were identified, 'I""' I mSTORIC ABOVE-GROUND STORAGE TANKS 'I""' .1 i ., , , Two above.ground storage tanks were used at this site from approximately 1985 to 1990. The tanks were used to store fuel. One borehole was drilled during WEI's investigation to check for possible soil staining, No fuel re9ti;"g~ above background levels were observed at this one location. Therefore, no soil samples were sent to the lab for confumatory analysis. T" I , I Due to the presence of approximately two feet of snow and not having the knowledge of the exact location of the two ASTs, WE! can not confu:m. that no soil contamination occurred in thiS area. WEI recommends that a follow-up visit be performed after snowmelt to investigate possible soil staining and subsequent cOntam;"Rt;On. T" I ! 'I'" I , .,.. , I MAY. -01' 95 (MON) 16:56 WRIGHT WATER ... TEL:303 480 1020 P.004 ... Cris Caruso Page 3 ... ... ITEMS TO COMPLETE THE WEI-RECOMMENDED PHASE n ASSESSMENT ... Items yet to be completed as a part of WEI's presentlY-llUthorized Phase n limited investigation in~ude final analysis of soil samples for chlorinated hydrocarbons and interpretation of thcse analyscs, In addition to the limited authori:c;ed worle, WE! rCC(\mm..t'Itl~ going forward with the remainder of the Phase II work oriiinally recommended by WEI. WEI also recommends testing of all transformers at the site that have not previously been tested for PCB contcflt. This last item. is outside the original recommend scope presented by WEI, A cost estimate can be completed for this additional work after an accurate accounting is supplied to WEI of which transformers have recently been tested. ... r- I r r r !. r I ... I 1 i I 'r" , 1 ... !. ",... ! i , ! i 1 PRA:TIWpra:laJ MEMOS\M-Caruso.PRA 952-034.010 .,.. 1 I _ MAY. -01' 95 (MON) 16:56 WRIGHT WATER TEL:303 480 1020 P.005 3e346'33130 PHCENIX AN'l-YTICA.. F-91? T-214 P-e02 RFR 25 '9:5 16:'" - 2l5-April-~:5 . m2~ ~ES - - - - Paul Avant Walt. Engine.ring, Ine. 24~0 Alcott St~e.t Denver, Co Small - P.A.L. PRO~ECTJ 72~0 CLIENT PR03ECTJ 952-034.010 '""' I>.ar Paull - I En~los.d 8r. the results of the rush TCLP Metels analys.. for the loil s..ple. fro. your Aspen Ho~si"g Ph... 2 proje~t. The sa.ple. were ..eceiyed by Phoeni~ Analytical on Ap,.11 18, 1995. No ..tals were det.eted at levals greater than the TCLP ..Mi.u. eonta.inan~ liait. Pleale note that due to poor aatriM spike recaverie. for Seleniua, the sample. were analyzed by the Method of Standard Additions. r I !"'" '!"'" I If you have any questiona, please eall. r .'C.~Wk 'i I Wendy Llyaly Schall Che.:I.l\t II'" I , II'" I .,.. , , 1 r T 3401 i..dustrial Ill... · broo~field, colorado 80020. 303/469-1101 MAY, -01' 95 (MON) 16:56 WRIGHT WATER - TEL:303 480 1020 P,006 F-917 T-214P-0B3 AI'R 2S '95 16:56 3034693130 PHOENIX AlR..YTICRL SAMPLE I.D.: WE-1 PAL" 683941 S,,"P1.E llATRIXI SOLID EXTRACT MATRIX: WATER FDUMl) SPIKE REO ANALYSISI CAS NO. CONCa RECOVERY LEVEL DATE: ANALYZED (mll/l) (Xl (mll/ll ARSEMIC 04/21/ilS '14"'(11-38-2 <0.002 80 :1.0 BARIU" 04/21/9::1 744e-3S~3 8.40 8m 11lle.1ll CADIUtJM 1Il4/2la/95 7440-43-9 -c0.1Il2 ,e 1.CI cKROKIUl'l e4/2l1l.l95 744fl1-47-3 <0.1&2 &3 5.0 LEAD 04/24/9:1 7439-92-1 <lIl.! 1l/J3 5.8 ISERCURV 84/21/95 7439-i'1-6 d.00C2l5 180 0.2 SELENIUM 84/2fll/9:1 7782-4!:1-2 <ID.el S -- 1.e SILVER 8./28/95 7440-22-4 <0.e:> 10e 5.l/J S : S..ple analyzed hy Xe~had 01 S~andard Addlt1on. du~ to low ..~~~x .pika r.=ove~1.a. - ( ---' - ... ~ ... REPORT DATE: CLIENT: 4HALYlUS. CLIENT PROJECT; P.A.L. PROJ'J;:CT: DATE SAllPL.SD: DATE RECa:tVED, DATE EXTRACTED: DATE DIGESTED. ... - r r PHOENIX ANALYTICAL. LABS SUKMARY IlJ;:PORT . m2mENIX ~ 04/25/9S WASTE ENGINEERING. INC. TCLP kSTALS by SW-S" 1311\.o~. ~QID\7000 SERIES 9S2-0~4.010 ASPEN HOUSING PHASE 2 729/1l 04/14/9:5 Cl4/18.19S 04/18/95 04119/95 i" I r i r , r ~ , '! i I I , 'i' I 1 - i 1 REPORTED BYl REVIEWED PY:tw~-a 'i'" 3.{Ol indu.strial 1 ne - broomfield. eolorado 80020 - 303/'69-1101 1 .... ~AY, -oj' 95 (MON)16 : 57 WRIGHT WATER - (-. --' .... .... .... .... - .... r , r r r r r .... 1 , , r 1 ,.. i r ,: " "" I , TEL:303 480 1020 P.007 30346~313E1 PHJENIX A-R.. YTlCAl. F-917 T-214 P-1il04 RAA 2S '9:; 16:S7 PHOEHIX ANALYTICAL LABS SUKKARY REPORT M PRO ANALYTICAL WIOfA:.lOlUES REPORT DATE; CLIENT; ANALYSIS I CLIENT PRO.J2CT. 1'.A.L. PROJECT; DATE SAKPLED; DATE REaIVED: DATE EXTRACTED I DATE DIGESTED I 1114/215/9:!l VASTE ENGINEERING, IHC. TCLP METALS by SW-846 1311'.od. 3010'7111111111 SERIES 9S2-e34.1111111 ASPEN HOUSINO PHASE 2 7290 04/14JQS 04/18/95 Gl4/18/91S Gl4/19/liS SAKPLE I.D. I WPS-l PAL. &8391 SA"PLE "ATRIII SOLID EXTRACT ""TIIlts VATER FOUND SPIKE REG AHAI.YSIS/ CAS NO. CONC. RECOVERY LEVEL DATE ANALYZED (-ern. ) (Xl (.,,/1) ARSENIC 04/2.1/95 7440-38-2 <:8.082 BARIUPl 1ll"/21 195 7440-39-3 1.2 CAI)HIUK 94/29/95 7440-43-9 <0.02 CHROrl:7;UK "./2C1l/SS 7440-41-3 <0.02 LEAD 04/24/95 7439-92-1 <0.1 MERCURY CIl4/21./9S 7439-97-& <ra.CIl005 SEL2)lIUlI .4/2111/95 7782-4.9-2 <ca.Gl1 S+ SILVER 04/2111/95 7440-22-4 <1Il.1111S 5. III 1.e.1II 8:5 98 98 1. III 89 :I.. U3 5.. 110 8.2 lGl. 1.0 S.. S $ Sample aDalyzed by Method o! Standard Add~~~Oft. due ~o lay .a~r~x .p~ko recov.r~es. . I Ccrr.18t~on Coe!~~Q!ent <..995. Actual value. 0.993. 1.pl~o.~~on ia ~h8~ valve =ould ~e .b1...d .1~Sb~ly low. .........., ~~~ 3401 Indulltrial lane. broomfield, REVIEWED 8YI~~?1l~ colorado 80020. 303/.69-1101 TEL:303480 1020 P,008 I'" ~AY, -0J'9S(MONl16:S7 WRIGHT WATER .' ... ':C '. ... ... ... ... ... ... r r'.- r I r ! r r ! ,.. i ',I r 1 T ..- ! I Ir' I 1 F-9Zl 1-215 P-ee2 API< O!S '.95 17:03 ::3Iil346'33130 PH:IENIX ANALVTI~ ......;: . : . . , :" ., '. . 21-Apr-9S Paul AVllnt Waste Engineering. Jnc, 2430 Alcott D=tver. CO 80211 PHOENIX ANALYTICAL J ~-\B()R~IORIr:s INC. PAL. Project: 7290 Client Project: 952.Q3<4,OI0 Dear Paul: 5ncloscd erc the results ot the EP A 8260 BrexnyH AliaJysis for the soil samples submitted on Aprll18. 1995. Plell!e note that.in addition to toluene, several terpenl:.S were detected in sample WPS-l. All oftht: terpencs were at very low concentrations (<lOl-lgIKg), Their re&pCCtivc values are listed in the,ra1i!' data for the sample.. . The BTEX/TVH analysis encompasses hy4r0carbons rangn;g from. OJ - C14 in carbon distribution. The TVH value includes the BTEX analytes. other aromatic hydrocarbolU, sliphatic and olefinic hydrocarbollS, and oxygenated petroleum additives, such as MTBE, if they are present in the sample. Ifyau have any questions. please call. " .: ., '(, 001 " . 3401 industrial lane. broomfield, colorado 80020 . 303/469-1101 ......- ~ -. - - .:: . . MAY, .-0J'95(MON) 16:57 WRIGHT WATER ,... . .. TEL:303 480 1020 p, 00.9 3034693130 PHlEN IX lW'lL YT ICI'L F-'32liI T-215 P-e03 ACR 2S '95 17:00 """ < SUMMARY ANALYTICAL FORM ... CLIENT: CLIENT PROJECT: P.A.L. PROJECT: ANALYSIS: DATi SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: DATE; ANALYZED: DATE REPOATEO: Wlltl Engineering 952-034.010 7290 8TIOOTVH by EPA 8260 04/14196 04/18/95 04/20/96 04/21/95 fa PHOENIX ~ INC. - ... - MATRIX; CONe: UNITS: Soli ps/Kg ...,-vl/=: 1..00 "'J I~.J" ~ /~ ...., Z 0 "'j /k:; "'-1)7'-4 '-- ~ r~ ETHYl. TOTAL TOTAL VOL. BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES HYDROCARBONS 0. 'J J "',ja oJ - ',AL .1. r r r I CLIENT SAMPLE ID: WE-1 < 0,8 < O,B < O.B 0( O.B 310 ~'IoQ~~.::p,:::"Ii"..J;;~';"!; ~'~":!'""!~~~"'S~"~~'!!:!.:""'f'n"'":"'B!..'!~.!U'''''-'''_'7"I~~..~;;.:rB6:Q--~t.'O:'....-o'II' .,.. Y':;:;'''~.w~~..~~.;.Ct;;.q&l:,\~O'-O'' ~'!".I;:~.~~;:.~~~if~~~"'~''l ~~"w:"~~.l'"'~~:O:: ;~I\!,":i:~:':~:'~..... !~~~~~~~"'lY.\''''Q::'~~'!.~~E''~..... ;'!: :;.; '.:)'''S~.-:.:;i.~1:.':: :"I~...~~I . 'f " r !'" .1 .. All " <" values ara MOLs, r I QUALITY CONTROL: I, 'i" ! ., This method Is a GeMS techniQuI, end lhe quar.ty controlls as In the SW-848 capillary column volatiles method. This Includes delly tune checks, dally ca6bratlon checks, dally blanks end .ppropria,. IiplkllS. An IiUch QC wea conductad as required end found. to be wilhln acceptable limits. . ,.. I ! REPORllNG O.lJALlFfERS: ".. I . J-: Indica11S thllt the anlllyte conoenu.tlon was found betwllen the quantitatlon limit and the d81cctjon limit or othcrwlae ouuide of tho c.libratlon li",11I. The v.l~i. ..en I. therefor. an estimate. T ! .S.: Indicates that the .nalYle was plBSenr In the dailv blank. The value seen has been corrected to reflect ,hia. &. tl?;Z. REV1EWEO BY, if #' :~. 0 2 .,. 1 ! - .,.. I I I ., .3401,industrial lu'18 . broomfield., colorado .80.020..". 303/.~6~::.110i. ..... :\ \, ~IA ~f:er- \ ft~: D4'o:J '\:.L...4.r \ , ,... 00 Pt...... ,\ '. ""'"" u,,^e~ . / \' I , .5 .. \ \ \ I " i I ,-( ! ~ ;.. ~ . . " . - ." . \ : ! \ 1 l ..J / \. - - . ~ / \\- \ \ \ \ : / .../ " . / " / 'Nde: / ~~~,. "-..::: \,~ P\g:JAvL~ vt~ V1" ,/6<:::- Ma0",~~-t:ve~ ~Jfl'dJ +lie i'ebw-t,~ ~ +1h2 ~ l,\,(e"'P" cts. \~ t2:u-t~ y - , t . \ , \ ~~ ',-- - . ~..- --.. "i .~ - Tl ~ - ---- ----- - . - J l"^!:!C"~T ~~ VI"' ~ ~~ : .. fnt "". , '..: . "" I .' ~_~~~til ~ . ~ -, Wb::A~ ,",-,'--~--"---",._._._-_.'--'-' .. ......----- ------..-. ...---. ,...-- _._-----~ ----.- l!.~ ~~~ t:...i ll.- :...1 ~!: i~ . t:>NISnOH 3' a "01::1 0.::1.::1 " ".. i , ! 30"'dI::l3.L"M ! : , , ; . , L ~i.l'L . c:: . ';,. z" :.~ " . - ....0 . ,,' - I . t/) : . ::c I., 1,. I' .i .. i ! ~ ! ',,' - I ~ ; t I ~ . i i ;0 i ~i .J ~ I i , II ~ 1 n ~ , 0 ~ ~ I ! ;' ~ n ~ I ./ ~'J · 8 , { ~ ~ l , I ~v.i(~ ~ ~ t q~ 1-- J i: ~ 1 QJ i'14.lx' l.~~~,J.~ :a 0. ~ i.l. ~ i tHO;~ 4l -S ~ VI ~ ..... illl! ~ * "{ ~ " 11 ~g (.t ~ r--- Q. J'( l . ~ l1-~L_!~ i "2~~J'"1 ~~ - n., -;:)'l~'tl.~ Q K.~~llt L, 1~~1 ~ z 1-~~~i\1~1- um ~ ,- 2 I t , .. .l. . '.>c~ ~! ~~~L ~ J J>J~ 12 -< i. "e I '( L ~ lit ~~ h~ U &;lh~" ~-' ~, . . t J. --' -- "(II "- ~ Q " .. ~ -"""1 ~ L__-! : z < ..J 0- LLI 0- < o en (~j Ie '&jz $~1 ~i < <Ill If $ .~~ ~e..J ~~ I ~ ... ; 0- . .I~ F n ~ ~ r--, 0 .' Il : " t t r--. .. i! <. .~ t ~ / I I \\ //) \\\~ '';',- /.:.;?- \ ~~"I ~ " ./ -_.4 ~ ! .- / o . .~.~.... @~ ~. I a~.i Is;h811 ig!1 ! J~ · i~ I!J i. 01 h ~ ~I ~ l ~ ~ ~r,)fo..Irq;JI 81JJrg:s1I1l0H r,)lIGl1B]PJIoDV lUl~SV .JO ~';J> :J> ..JI..:ILMn 'It Z JLOJI I m .. Ii I i~~1 I I f ~ I"'" , I' ri ~ ~ II I I I l I"'" I' i - T-- t I ~ I I I .-- -- ._. :J I I ~ I ~ I @. @. .--..- ---- ! I @g ~ @:S? L ~ I~ M!l:" @bll II @.. ~~ :3)~ L"''--___ -- / / - - r---. r---. III!'I - ! I , DO 1lO<;J~~ ~S1mOH ~1l1l1l1BJP.W>>V D II lj .Inl hi · umcllsy ~o A1l0 I ~ ~ I J 8 ~Sp V JLltNC'll '()l; JLO"ll d i I I ~ . o ;., .O-,ZZ ..0 S . I '0 I 11 . u ~~ ,,! O"r-O l~ o ~ p 0 .......... = . I tL _ ~ I - '" I ....... ~ J <, "0 .-olr ..-0 ,. \ N --; 0 , . j-,t ,h N 0 ..... I '" ... N r==1 Q I it> I ~ I ~ z L~ 0 I '=J D. m :> - 'i;;::- I IIGBI,- I . I 0 I . ;., I . ..O-.O~ .t ~ ~-,~ .to L-,~ ~ @b @f: ~~ ~;.. I" " , <Xl :::: '0 "' . o ~ '0 ;., , o .. ,,0 ,8~ 11I11 I! fi~'!11 ~~~ 2Jl:np1l1l.oH a]lQ1B1PJIO.DV DO D Ild-n ~~f ~- 1IllQ(j[sy JJ:O ~i;:J> I d I v JI.][Nfi 'ot: JLO"1l i ~ 'f~-'~ I ia I ~ &- ~ I > I > r\ .9 ,r n o ~ 11_- .' ......., ~ ~,t Ilk 0 ......., ~:? D I .. [ r,!J] , OJ - .., No . , I ~ ;" j @, ! @f:~ !!!!1M @bll @,. d)~ s "' , ~ I ..~ ,M "O-,8Z IIIUI.ID"I. f 1 DDldi ~~..4,d[ ihnpl1I1l0H OllCU1BJlW>.DV D UJIg(j!sy .10 ~,;::) V JLJtN:n '()l; JLO'"l! I ! . o <0 "t ,9 .Zn r ,9 ; 0 I . 0 I ;,. LJ ~ I . 0 I 0,. '" Q. ::> I , 0 I ;., ~t t c-,r ..t/L L ,r - ~ ! ~ I!!!!I. ~'i' I!!!!I'-< ~" ~ . 00 ~ .0 ,SZ 1I~!I.r~I~I. r , DDldl ~~.....a;cr B1ll!iS1l1lOH Q][Gl1BJP.W>>V D 1lllQ(l[sy :JO ~o 11 8 iip V .uNl1i. 'm: JI.O'1l I ~ I I [83 ~[83 DB ~ , 0 ~ @ ~ 5~ !~ " ' <Xl ::. -T IIUlaIDl+I' r , DO ~t..Alrd 8lU1~fU.OH ~1!c:n18]pJlO>>V 1== D 1l>>dlsy .10 ~i;J> v JIJINn '~.JJ:JCY][ dH I ~ [E8 [[II] [0 ~ ~ ~ ~; il~ - IIUI.PA~41. :n=rOJr.dl: 8up1IllOH ~l[Cll181PJl0.DV DO ! d I D . 1ImCllSY.1O h:lli;:J! v Jr.1[N.Cll 'Ol: .un i e [[J ~ "€ 5 ~; ~~ - IIIIl-sll,'- ~~wrcn: BUf&1l1lOH QllGl1lrJP.W.DV OD!dl D 1tllQdlsy JOI ~,;::) V .JLlLN:Cl .~ JLO'lI i ~ 0 m 0 I ~ @ ~ 5~ I I~ II~ 11.JJlI~I. r " DO ~..--.ild[ 81llIlS=H QUq1BplIO>>V I ~ ~ D mKllsy JO ~o I j ! ~Sp EO: .:n:.J[N[]). '61 JLO'1l d ! I I ~ OOm, ~m DB [0 o m 0 ~ ~ 5 ~ ;; o. '" ::: 1I111.~~lijl. I" ",,- DO D ~. Ad 8tn.S1Ml>H QllGl1B1PJlODV I ~ ~ 1L1laC:ltsy .JO ~o ~ q~P m JUN.C1l. '6t JLO'1I ~ dl i ~ m 0 m m m m 0 ~ ~ 5 m . <> :'.. IIUI.IDI ~I. ( .~ OD!dl ~f"-"d B""~fl1l1l.o.H allGL1B1PJlo.,DV D 1lWCIlsy ;):0. ~,;::)) 6[.I.lINl1l 461: JLQ'1l I e m ~ ~ m !; @. ~~ 1I1I.m!~. r "\ LJD ~f,- .--<d[ 8U~8il1l0H allCll1BJl).1lODV 1== D 1l>>dIsv JO 4i;:) dH m.JLl[NCll '61 .LO'1I I e .O-,6t I , , 0 0 I I 10 10 0 z l-.. 0 d i 1" 1" I 0, I I!M .... on i ~ ffi l-.. I!M ~ '- i . ., 0 I I ill ~ ..., 1" D S I ~ CD ,Z ~ 6-.l-.Z I 6-, .O~- g.. , @, . I .._.J N I. -::- 81 'r .... 'i' ~~ i~ IIIIU.811(41' f "\ LJD!dl D ~. _JI,Q[ 8upI1l1lOlHl Q"[Q18pWJl.lfV uwdsy JO ~':::l> 'i3I.JLJrNn '61 JLO'1l I ~ .0 ,t .9-,t .0-,6~ .9 ,t .9-;Z ..O-.l~ . o D.~ . 0 I~J 3) vlJ 2 I 61r! :U ~ ! J~ ~{D.~ ~ ~ ~r-= ~ D [7~!1 0 ! \] ~:' .. a~; g; C I D - D r\g; ~ .-. J~ ,..;;;; U I ffi ~ '0 I '.. , -t - 'I N . o I .. '" ~ , o I '0> I I 011 L == 10 - r==1 0 S I ~ [ I ] 0 lID, 1m:: 0 8 0 0 'd 0 ~ ~r I I (9b1l lID, " 2)~ z 0 , o I '0> '0 I '" 1I111.llll~41. , DO!:!I :aoQ~v.Ild 8ll1l81!1l<OH allC[l91PJlOB'V D WKlrsy J<O A:ai;:) f q~P er JI:.l[N!1l .6 t .JJ:.<Yll I ~ ::, I I :0 I 0 '" . . ~ 0 ~O ILi] I " '" I 1-. ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ " I I I '" 0J > 0 . . ! ~ ,. ~ > '" it> I it> > j (j) . ! ~ n (j) " I '" z LJd 0[. Cl .1 ,Z ;Z/l L , .O~-.9 .Z/l 9 ,9 ,-- I 13 ,-- I "'" @:Q) I!!!!l i :l!:: i ~ I @f reg II = I ~~ 1I~Il.M~!. , DO ~~<v.lr.d[ 8up;InoH ~<ll18PW.DV 1== D 1LllGKllsy JO ~i::ll d i I ;:) .JI:.l[NCJI. 'Yl: JLO'j[ I ~ 0-, .0 .O~ . '" '" QI 10 II ____ _: w 10 I ~ , o "in \: Is < -8.n~ < ! ~ ,\ ~ i ,& ,t s.S .t,~ . __~:_-, b,. (I I I I ill r'\ ""t ] 1\~-~H:Qi,f-J . o I 0> uJ: I~ ( . '" I " ~ @b @& 8 ~1r ::g~ i~ - I . o I i:l .0- O-.~~ 0-9 0- 9 IIIIH~~I. r ~ DO! d I ~~--J,d[ !h:llp=H a-[<l!1BpJlO,UV D 1UlQ(j[sy JoO ~,;::) oj ! ~ II) ~ i ~ l . o JtJrNn 'll: JI.O'l i i , : : 1 : I , , , ! , I : , , : : , , , , , ! i , I L________________________________________________________ 0-, o ..o-,or .0-,9 ..9 ,S I ~ I . c <- . ~ '" I b ;, b I '" I r ! j @, ! ~~ @hI! @,. ~~ . .. '" .. ~-.9 .~ I t,~ .~ I 6-,8 IIIIII.HII.'. ~'d[ ~=H GlllCll1BpJlo.DV LJD ! d I D 1tllGICl!sy ~o A:tlO ;::) J[J[NL1l . t l: JLO'1 I ~ ..0-,9 . ~ ,. . g , 0 . j .. ., 0- j N ::> 0. ~X'il U B I 111:._.:.11 L__J ;D \ , s I j -, ., j j ,~ I j .L ,t .& ,01 ,O-.O~ ~ @, @:1: ~ ~ i. I! I" " . '" , C: IIllll.WI~I. ~~ 8uiS1l1l0H G>>llCll1BfP.W>.DV CJDldl D 1lJ[Q(l[sy .10 h1lK:l> I ~. a.p ;:) JI.JrNn '1'(; JLO'1[ I ~ m ~ @ ~ mo , i: ~~ o 11I11 !~ .J~IIII!I. :ilOQ~ .d[ 8upll1l<l>H GtllGl1BJPU!ODV D D D liil b "II, ,,-=~.~ '"' I ! d I i ~ OJ o o o OJ ~ ; 5? t~ ~~ 1II11.!~lql. ~ S1crpiUllOH ~llGl1BpllO.uv DO I ~ ~ D 1lllQC)[sy JO ~'::J> i! ~~p ;::) J[.][Nf]l 'J?; JLO'"ll d ; I I ~ ~ @ ~ m ~~ ~. ~~ IIlil.~i~'I. ~llrdi: 2JupllIII<<l>H all<ll1BplIO.uv DDldl D 1IlIa<llsy J<<l> ~KJ> ;:) .J[J[N(ll . n: Jr.O'1! . I ~ o DJB ~ i ~ ~ ~; ~~ IIlll.I~~I. :arJrd[ 81lllpl1l1l0H ~llGl1BpllO.uv DO! d i D 1lJlQC]lsy .10 4i:J> I I ~ P 'l3l .lLltNn .~ JLO'l i ~ I I b I .. 12:S1 [ ~ [~ "'[ ~ I ~Ii D~, /^- I J8O'I) -' '? ",UIY. II N OT0,:! ()..,o[ v-3rT 1: ~Jl0 ~ 'I ~" [ I lEE=} =: g 18 () I~'~!-!D [O]~ ~U:> o I_f- D S ,8 c=J w . s 1. c <0 .' . .. 0 I .. "' , ,- ... , ~, s .. I "' . c I N s @. ~ @g9 Il!!!l'"' @bll @.. 2>~ . ..0 ,t ..9 ,i> .t-,9 .Z/~ 9 ~n 9 . zn g-" ,0 ,9Z IIIIH~.I. ~I;d[ BupU1l<O>H ~q1BJP.1I<O>.DV DO I d i D ~J<O> ~,;:) e: .J[.J[Nn 'U JLO'1[ I ~ ..0 .9Z .9 ,r .Z/l 6 ,Ll "' u U L ~ . ... :~ r\i <) ~ -~IW ! ~ ~ D : I c. D.~r-w I ,~'-- 1LJ ! I LdfU I All I . .0-,9L- ~. U===l ~I [~!D,OOI~ ~~,L D~ ~J J ~ ~I 7 ~ : i . ~/1:' ! ~I ~ . o ;., " " , '" b , 0, . o I .. '" . s "' , '" '" ..O-,L ,0 ,9 '" " I j @, @S ~f ~~ i~ . o .0 ,t ,9 ,t .0 ,r .0 ,SZ IIlllHIlI_I. . DO ~Ild[ Buq:sllWH Qll<Q1BJP.WDV I ~ ~ D u:mdsv JO ~1!;:) II ft ~ip e: .:JJ:.l[Nn 'l:l: J!.O'1[ dH i ~ rn o m DB [EEJ rn tEl [EEJ rn ~ (QJ ~ ~. I!!!!l'j' t~ ~~ 1I~;I.~II~I. ,-,. DO ~ Alrd B1llliS1lOOH 9l!<ll1lrJP.WBV D 1lllQdsy .JO ~J:J> ! ~ ~ Illi~Ji a .JLlLNtl 'zz J[.O'1[ I ~ ~ ~ I i ~ Isl lEE] L-- 0 ~ @ ~ 5~ I Ii 1I11.IDI+I. 1"""-,. 8 0 DD!dl D ~ >.1fodI lI.ll.fliloOH Qyq1BpllO'uv 1lJIQ(j[sy 3-0 4KJ> ill: .JLXNn 'u JJ:.O'1[ I ! m ag @ ~ ~ I!!!!J ~; ~~ 1II~II.MJ'!. 1""""\. DDLiiD 1l~. .;d[ ~1l1l0H ollGl1lJJlUO.DV ur,;KI[sy JO A:ni::> fl[ .J[.][Nn 'U J!.O'1[ OJ OJ OJ m o ~ ~ 5 ~; ~~ 1I111.JU' ~I. ~ ffupu1l0H Ql!q1lIpJ!OJJ'V ODldl D 1UIGXllsv JO ~!:Jl I ft ~ ~J ~ f3[ Jr.l[NG 'oz:oz: J[,O'J[ i ~ [[OJ o [E8 DB [EEj] [[OJ EB [EE] [[OJ ~ @ ~ 5lr m; 1111'1 "I ~ ~S=H i;JlliCll1BpJlORV DOL!! D . I- i8 'I !j.!Ui~ll. llJ[Q(j[sv JO ~1F;:J> I~. ! ~ I ~ ;:Jl .JUNn '11; JJ:.O'J[ o rnB ~ @ ~ ~ ~~ 0' ~ 1111'1 I! I ~~ 81crQ:S1l1l0H 9lrGl181P=.DV DO . I~ 18 D Ii ~j .idl ~tl · 1lllQ()lsy J:O ~D ! d i liS I II :::l> .JLlLN!1J. 'l[ i: JLO'1I i ~ m , ' '-'" o ~ @ ~ ~ M!I~ I I; ; \ , , iI " I " 1II111H~ !QI. ~ 1Jug:S=H GJ[Gl1SpWDV eJD!di D 1l>>Cllsv JO 40 i~' 8 ~ I ~ ;:J> J[J[NO '1'c:; Jr.O'1[ ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ l\@ ~; @. ~~ 1111 'I ! ~Jld[ ~81l1l0H =llGl1BpllO>>V CJD . I~ i8 D 'I ji -ilI11t;l- 1l>>dsy JO 4l;:) ! d I Ii !~~)~ ~ JLltN!1l. 'l['l: JLO'1 i ~ .0 ,9 S ., b , . 0 ~ , '" a. I OJ ::> ;" r,:;(ll IL/ B I Ik:._:>l I L__J ; 2:Jr\ , s ~, I ., I I '" ,- j - I - .L ,v .9 ,01 .0 ,or ( ~ @. I ~ 1!!!iI, ~'i' 1!!!iI:" I" ,., . QlJ ~ IIUH~!'I' !"'18m: DO :nO<.. JJ;t[ .81l1l0lH[ QllGl1BpJlO>>V I d I D t>>dIsy JO ~D ;:) .JJ:.l[Nn . t'z: JLO'J[ ! ~ [[OJ o o [[OJ ~ @ ~ m~ !~ " . (l) ;::; IIIIIH" PII. ~ $uy:s1l1I.OH all<CU1Il]PJlOD'V DOl > D lllICKllsy JO 4]:;Jl di Il ! ~l~ ;:) .lLll:Nn . lZ JLCYll i ~ 0-, . ,,0 ,Ot .0-,9 ..9 ,8 I II I ~ <- ~ C I b it o b I '" I I . 'i ;" In ~ ~ I '" j @b ! ~z @611 @b- 2l~ . ~-,8 .~ L T,~ .~ ~ 6 ,9 III il.lh!!~I. ~~ it1cr!s1lIlOH Ql[Qwpm>>v DO! Ii I D 1I>>d[sy JJ:O> ~n :Jl ..J[J[NO '1J: ~ J[.O'"l I ~ o , "O-,OE' ~ I '" q ID _0______ w 10 I e b I '" z o g; I b I '" ..['-,S ,,~-,r 6 z o r I J , "' I io j @, I9f: ~~ ~~ I~ -------, I I L '-. I rH I b I .", '" .0-, ,,0 ,ZZ: ,,0-,9 ,,0-,9 III! 'I I Wrl\dI iJ1cIu:s1l1lOH 01[Q1Bp.W.llJV LJ[J . Ii 18 D IU i · nIl ~f'i · I ~ ~ uodsv JO ~i;:) ... I d H 0> .JI:..IN!1I. 'il: JLO'1l I ~ .0 ,9 , ~ 'I b . .: c , I '" ~ Q. I ::> '" flXll LJ B I I~_.:.II L__J ; i~ 0 , ~ -, I 'I I I .., ,- I I - .L " .9 ,Ol .O-,Ot j @, ~ ~ M!I, ~'i' M!I:" I" " . DC ~ IIlllH!!~~' 1""'. DO I Ii I ~ .Ilq3[ 81IJr!:s=lHI ~Gl1lrJP.ltO.lJV" D 1llIQdsy .JO> 40 ; l ft ~~p ;:) JLl[NC1 . lZ JI.O'1[ I ~ m o o o m ~ @ ~ ~. I~~ '" . Q) ::; lI~ll "I . CJD . '~H8 ~:Jrd iJo:qs=H G>>llGl1B1PJlOBV D II iJ -iill :fl~ - mKlIsy .JO &]:0 I ~ ~ ;:) Jr.1INCl 'i2: JLO'1[ d ~ ~ I ~ o rn ( ~ @ ~ ~ I!!YI S; ~~ ~ lI~ll.~I~I. ~1I(dJ: ~UllOJH[ 911C!l18jpJlO.llJ:V DO I ~ ~ '0 1IJlQ(llsv JO 4]:;:)> I 1 8 ~ ~p ::> JLJrNC1I. '1[ i: JLO'I d ~ I I ~ ~ @ ~ ~ I!!l!I ~; @' ~~ 1I~11.lpl~U. ~ 81clJS1l1l0H QllG[IIi]PllIO.DV EJD Lii 0 1lllQIdtsy JO A:!tKJ> i '" ft! ~J ! r ~ i .. NV1d !IJJ8 ~ ~ <: ~ I.. C> 5: ... ~1II'f · , . tl.~..J!dlhi. . 11 fill,! ~, lOOr, .JI: S""!SIl1l.0H Q1[qBUDO>DV ~J04D IDOl ~~ .0. f II I & , .' , -"'---''',.,....,''''-'''- --.,- '''' ~",/ '''-, ,.,....,....~'-..; ...., '" \\ \ \ J \ / \ / \ /' , " ~ " \ .... \.. .... ,\ \\," \ '" '\ .. \ .. .. \ \ \ \ \ .. \ \ \ \ \ \. .. \. \ \ , \. \. \ .. .. ~ , , , ... \ \ '\ , ' , ' \,' ~ ~, @:.? ~~ @i.!I:.. o 0..J - CtJ '2f),."""" , , , f \ ',- ',-- -",# / .' ,- / ,/ -,....>"'. -.. ~, ,'-, '. \ ", '\ "\ , , , , " \ \ \-....... ........ \~""'" '. ~...... " "-"',.'''''''' .."'....,..~:~:::',' ...,....." ""'- ..'....,.... "-. / " "''''-. 8770 :0 .~ ...) / / / "-""-,_...".._,,-,,.~::::::: -------',..,--_..,----'--\-----.., ..,-----..' _.....-" \ // . / " , \ , . , / / , ("./,.~' 1'''7 l / ....-.....-' /#6" /i'j' f \ A ~., ( -'- >, .:.::..:::::~.:~:::~....< ......'......., , ' ""'.. . , l \ .....,,,....., \.3~ \ ., //~~.. / , \\f"" \ 'J.l.~' \ /,.,. " .' , .'/ ,..""- ,<' ,,' <<'- \ \'\ "'-... 2\ ~'" '--"'....,..". /~\>") . \J.i, : (,0 ,'-''''\ .-> ! \ -' / /\.111 jJ.J,~ ", , , \ .. \...- -....t....".........- -. , ... ...... ~ ..,.,....... / / / ., -'.." 700 " " .., "'" '. \ \. &7 So ; \ \ \ ~\ \\ \"'\ .. , \ " , , , \, \ \ \ ~ ~ \ \\ \\\\ \ \ \ ,$$", ,;.1/;<::':'''''' '...~.J 1111 ~I 'i I-! I II h -Ida '1Ia- ~=..~YEJDI!lii'D .~/l C ,CI .t-,9 p------~o--- ---0--- --""9 I I I , I I I I I , I I I I ! I ,..., .- 71 . Ts .:::. .., ~-- - - I ~ I I I '" I .., I I I ~D , i:! I I - , ~ I ~! .., . I 0 I I I I ~ 0 j6 '" ;" I ~ J jif~ OJ I .-I\J\j [ ) I I I ~ , I .~h L .' ~.I.-,S ~ I I I ., ~- .1' I Ofl .~h L ,9 <> 1:2, lMIQ Q ~ t7~'1I "1 1-. I J ~ r I :> o , .., r--'" .~ ./ [] I 0 .I \ ;r, .' .... f -...... '" ;" .. ::> J ~ , ----- -~ ~ I I '-~ r--' .~-, .9 ,S l~ : <:J--' . 0 I I N OJ - - - ..0 ,t .9.t .0 ,8~ s @, fj ~f ~:.. ji~ 1l1i1.ftG~. 10 I ~ . . o 0 I I ';')itl '" ~ . I...- ", ~ . o I '" , I ;" :. .. N .9-," :a?,'!'~'d[ B1qsnoH Qlq1BpW.DV uadlsv .JO ~n at .][.][NO '8 t ..JLO"1[ EJD[u]D i!i j.. LlI ILl ~ I o ~ 0 D w ~ I .tt, ~ '-,II I----m~---- 1\ I . , I. ! ~'r--tg-g L--i ; ~g rx z infO[! .'-i~ () N ~. OolB i IL: B-Sl I ~ Ian) ~ I ~ ~ ~ dJlII ~~I \J!~ I CD I- ! ~ l"n I~L..: l '[ I fJ ~ 0> I ... ~ ~ .. I ... . o I ~ ~ .... I ~ ~ ~ IQ'S ~ ~ (gS'~ ~~ !i~ .z ~ t ,Z .O-.S~ III' ~t Ii ;,11 Hi -Ids I~s - l')~~ SuflmOH Ql[c:ppJIOBV . . 1DIisv 110 ~o m.J[J[NCl .81 JLO'"I c -\j~~i:~ '. [JJ EJDGlJD ~. ~ I I I Idll e ~i <!i: @ ~. ~ I!!!!I ~~ ~S 11'1 ~I! · la.IIIII". III I i~p :J.?'ft?'d[ 8UJtmOJHI auqvp.llO>>V . . uadrsv ;Ie ~o fl[ .DNCJi. '81 JLO'1[ EJDGiJD .':".._~.:,: ......, :.; '':.~;:.:: ~;""';:" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~t:J::~ ~~~ ~~1:~]: -~ ~ @ ~ i ~; a~ 1Ii1.Mf.. l-""~Jd 8uItmGH Qllq1BpJrO.uy . madlsy JIG ~n m JLlINn .Sl .Jr..a1[ []~ O. [We e 01 alii I e' . I . ... ..._n. D ... ~ . II ...II u___..... ~ ~: ;1 I :Crt.' I ...:..... .~::>:.:~ h________ " = - ';'~ ".:::' I D D ~;:.;'~:::~ I = D = :.:-:!,'-::, u..__u__ ',.:-:.:,:" -----_.."- --........ I _______h_ I I: " I [OJ I I t-- . I .-...: I I [OJ I -- -- I I . I \ ~ @ ~ ;~ Ii IIlll-M+I- ~ SuitmO:HOIcpp.m.DV . uocisv JfO ~D er J[J[NCl 'st JLO'lI EJDLillD III .. ... ... ... -. _".__,..._..u ----- . . . ~ ~ .. . ~ 0 ~ ~ @ ~ 10 I; ~ - ~I ii ~ '@ ~ "......, "......, 25' O. - 3' O' 4' 6. 4'-0" '" I , "< I 0, [(t I . .. ~ 8'-0" 7'-0. . \ I . .-J'f, ~\ . ~ .<t "'. I I ~~ C i \~ o. q J1\ <= .. CJ. 0 r ~ "! 0 tr"O ] I 5<'11 B ... M 1(1 s 0 ~ ~ ~6' 0" \J 'LY ~ '" LJI J "! [L]I D I i 0 IS 7 - ~ ~ le/-- r\!i .!. q i II - ~~ I i , ~ ~ . 11'-91/2" 3' 6" 28' 0" D[!:JDD lLO'lI' 22. UNIT lB City of Aspeml AffOJrdalblle Housmg lPJrojject .IU~ IElq.!1 '111 i;1 ~I I~ i .~ ~. 4'-6" 4'-0' 8"-4- D I q I DO ILOI' 22. UNItT lB ir 1111I I I = ~ I City of Aspen -, r 8f-"'11 AffOlJ:'Cllalblle H01lllSmg lProjiect ;1 I I~ i 1"'\ 7;~ .. I 'l IiiiiI ~ ~ @ (jg o D~DD .-, !LOT 22. 1UNIT JB Cit:y of Aspen Affoxdalblle HOWlmg lP'roject -1!lh blii( · !U'III ;118! J~i ~! .~ .., I ~ fiiii] ! ~ @ ~ ~. ;!{:Htif .-" ~L~- D~DD LOT 22, UNIT lB City of Aspen AffOJrdalblle HOWlmg lProject Eil~ E,'I I! 1111 -Iii" ;i-i~ il ~. .,-" ~.I " ~~ ~ @ ~ II~ I [OJ] :: 1 I ~ ~E:~::~::t~., ....,,,>..,..,.~ ;t~~::~::f;;t~~:~~ :-~::r:~::~::~::r::, . "._.__._.~ 'u,__,__\ ~ 11'ii!~i!~ . ,... ,.. ''''c;>i'l I, :\;;Hm:~;;p I! ~tm;~: ~i;'p lEI] I '. :, ; ::,!.. . ,~.~:~;, . ~'.."" " <~<..;.(.~; ... t' -.... ~ .. ........" ~~.:..~~{}i..::. . ~7..~~..:: :;. ":.,;".:,' .:..... . .,. .1 DDI= D ~ e-- .m....... - ,.>' ~ ,; :.~.. IF Innl 0 I I. . .'. '.' I-- ",,;,;,,;~ =0 .,..,,~ II I r :'''H''&-. lbU ~~)::t;t~ "..,'" ,..~ -t-;'" ~::\--t-_:"''' -.-.T--~__'--.-.,:~ :~n\::~--;:: ~__~::;~ H::,~ ~ .. '-).., r:J:~::~. .__,u,__"-.>> . ,...~.,./) ~:: ~ ::~:: T_ 10 )/ .~..,..,,,,y """~""'l' :l::E:~- -c--,,, ~ -/ ~,w- u,l D pp DO LOT 22. UNlL'J[' 18 .~~.!lll City of Aspm I I = i I AffOlOOla1b:D.e H01lllsmg lP'J:oject ,. H I~ i ~. ~ ~~ ~~ ~; ~ :;!! @ ~ . .... .. .. - . - .. 0 . .. . Ir II = .. . . . ... . . . ... ffi I-- . . . I~I D~DD LOT 22. u:Nll'lI' lB Ci1l:y of Aspen Affon:llalb1e H01lll.sing lP'roject Rp'I~ RI'I I! 1111 .j rl Bil.~hl. i ,I I J~ I IIflll.~Ifq! · ~r..3r 8;cI1fs1lIlOH Qllcn1lJ1?W.DV 00 ~ ~ ~ D 1lJlQI!lIsv }to 4,;::) L ~ , Il ! ~l~ NVIcI a.LIe ~ ~ ! I ~ c: IIII~I I II~i.'lliI~l. ~J;dI Suf1mOH QirCl8pllO.DV 1lII'adsv "0 ~D er .JLINn '8t .Jr.JCYIl --~. : -,""\: . ~ ~ ~ ~:, ; '. EJDGiJD o DD DD 00 :;!g @ ~ 5 ~~ ~~ lIil.M~' ~ SuJtmolH[ ClIC1lT8JlUOBV . uadsy .JO ~n flI JLlINO '81 JLO'1l ';::;O'L(;;;; -~~~E EJD[wD D ! ~ ~ S~ ~~ IIlil.I,. ~ SuisnoJB[ ol~JJV , uocllsV JO ~D EI[ DNCl '8t .un EJDLillD , " - ", , - .. f D I , , = " II Ir ,~ " :r,J' .,;} I ...--..... - I I --......-- I 1\ :.::; ::~ .:::\:~ ..-------- I __u___u. = D D I ______u__. == D .....----- = .' H....... '..:-:.:,:' I ---....--- I I: 7 I [OJ I I <i I I ~"\'_i"I..,;L"",._ji::' I [OJ] I -~ :{;i;;~::~ :{I;~::~ ::~ I " I , , I ~ I~I \ :!:: @ ~ m~ g~ lIIil.RE~. ~ iJUJSU1l0H QlqBtlUODV . umcllsv JO ~D m J[J[Nn '8t JLO'1l . EJD~"D .1'""'\ = I I I llil I a .i:Jt=!: .~. : :~;:-.\..: "~' ',:: ,'.; ..:.~;::.; :~""';: " . _ ~~ ~ ~ ~~t:r: :~~ ~~ ~ ~t ~]: -~ ~ ~ 5 I; IIlil I ~i.BIII~I. . ~ SulS1llOJE[ Oiqupro.uv uocl!sv ;go ~ er Jl:INO .81 .I.CYll F1DF-:lDI LJ llillJ I a . . - - ... - .. . .-.-.......- - . . . .. . ... .. .. . . D . . . I !~ I Ii IIln-SI!" ~~ SilrpIU1l0H 1l>>1l~>>V EJD I Iii D UKllsy .JO> 4,;.::) f:l[ JLlINCll. '8 t .u:nr I e .~/~ ~-.O .t .9 I-' ... ... . I I" r-- D! , 1s ~ '" c- ,. . D 10 '"' '" "- '" I CJ I~ " I ~! '" '0 ,. I ~nO,6 '" ;., '"' .(\\ J~J II ~ ~~ [ ) ~ . ~ - I ,~/~ L-, r'.-'S <Xl .~ , F= 0/ (6' L(; ;$. b . N i l ,III 13 :::- d ~~ '" v D Ie " I ... 0> I ~ Cl.;" = " - .l 0 ~ t! .~ , ..9 ,S ~ , 0 I I " '"' '0 .... "' ..0 ,t ..9 ,7 ..0 .se: ~ !~ J ~: i~ 1I~IH~~I. t"',. DO ~OQ Id 8llIiSUlIOH GJIlGl1lJ]pJlORV D ~ JO 4'0 I ~ ~ m.IJrN.Cll '8 t .I.O'1I d i I I ~ ~ b , .. ;1".1 ul lu :Lf;:> I D r/!: ~ 0\\,0 ~ . i """')'1 '......./' , ~ ~-. ~- ~ ~ . <- , '" . <-~ N ,9-.. "Z l t ,Z ..O-,il: IIlil1 ..! I ~ LJD!di ~UdI 8""~8IlTlOH GJ[Q1IiP1lO>>V D II h -nil ifl~ · 1lllQdsy JO ~i;:) iII .I.lLN.Cll. 'Sl Jt.0'1t i ! m 831 DB D D o o ~ ~ ~ ~? m: " . '" :::: IIUI.fi'i~' 7""'\ OD!dl :n=. .IodI BIU1~..1l1l0H Ol[CJlW1P.1lO>>V D 1lllQdlsy ~ 4,;:) ElI .J[.][NTlI. '8i .un: I ! --c- m . ~ m m 0 . m :!1E ~ ~ ~ 1!l!!J~ , I~ IIIIl.PA~i. .",......., 81Dq: DDldi D 11=. Id S1l1l.0B G)"[~.DV 1ll!rolI<llsy JO A1li::J> t:l[.uN!1l '61 JLO'1I i ~ [0 [l] ~ @ ~ ; t;; ~. . S~ ~~ [l] ~. ". ~. 2Ir~o' 3! 7 1 ~.. 3'-3- 3-~" 104"' '" 1 q ~I "! I "! 1 1 "!. " q . ..,~ 1 " "! . ~i 1 q I ':lID c: '@ " " ~ z "t 1 ... N - "! I. N " . . ~ I "!. I 1 ~ q , . "! 1 -'; J:j ," q I 22',-{)' 6' 0" D JU- DD LOT 20. UNllT A 'hr illll I i =J I Ci~ of Aspen -)11 I-it . . A:ff<DJrClla1blle H01llSmg lP'roject ,"""" .~ 26'-0' i 2m '@ i fi7 1/4' 3'-3 4' ,~ ~,gJ 11.,g) ..,1iiiiI ~2W I ~ o z .., . to! .., '" " .., o . . '" I !l I D I f ~I DO LO'lr2O,. 1UNl!"Jr A ~'I!' IllI I I = JI Ciity of Aspen · 'I i.~f'l AffmdalbB.e Ho1ll1smg lP'roject II I J~ i II' ~z.ar.8~"l[q1J1lUODV DDllli D . . ~l!i 18 .. J<. e I. lil Il~ ~ .JO.40 V JLINn 'Ol: .JLO'l , o '" .1:-,& .~/L I: .8 I 0 t , 0 I '" U \j I b I 10 '" ll. ::J . I . 0 I ;., .t I: 1:-;1: ,t/~ t ,I: - s @, IE g ~ fi ~9 l!!!!l>< l1@II ~c. ~.~ ...0 .9('; ,~ ."......". ,~ ~@ i~ liiiiI i ~ ::!I @ ~ ":;;~~im; -'~:_{ lEE} D I ~5 a DO LO'J[' 20. UNIT A f'r (Jill City Qf As]p>eJm ! = i I · '1 Bi.~fJ Affonlla1b>lle Ho"WImg lP'Jrojject BI R ,. i ~ .-.. ~~ I. o . m ~ @ ~ ....m. . . .-.. D~DD LOT 20, UNIT A City of AspemL .AffOJl:"dlable Housing lProject Ide! 'I 11111 .tiflhi.i~ · I"""" I"""" , ~~. II - blffil 'i ~ ~ """" . . , aD. s...'\ 'm':>::I"'''~ ~:t:, . ~:\:_:-l::~ : ~ . ..~::' i?. ..3/ yy.. rn , l\ D'''.~. ili~'D!'DI.~20'UNllTA · 1.L. i It II' . . ~ .1 G1l:y of A.8JP'ellII1 · ili \w.1I ! II.' II II I ---- , dtll-it' ~. .~. ~I 1I~ t ~1ffiiJ i .~ @ ~ . .. r. r D <= ~u I EEJ .. ..~ == r=r= D IIliDD LOT 20, UNIT A. . ~'P rIll City of Aspen 1 I. ~. ~ · .pei. ~il AffonllalbJleHo1lll8mg. JProject el If I' i ~ ."""'" r'""'\ '" V I ~~ 0 - "\ :~ '" ~i "! I q ~ 29J ~ '\Q) I I q ~ i - "\ ~ :lID fiiii) '" i; '" ~ I I q 0 . ! 0 0 z 0 fiiii) ~ ~ ~ I I 0 0 . , I 28'-0. D~DD LOTa::,~ pd~Mi n'lll · 'si! sr .~.J II .A.ft'oll:\dla1blle Housing lP'rojject .. I Ii'~p ",......, ~. !i! I 0 <) ~ I e . [] ,(5 0 "l;g D .'ilil 01 ~~ "!. , . [] ~ i <J), ::iiiI 'ilil ~ i , e . ~ " e , '" " e ," '" . c: " " z - "; ~ . '" " .. . ;: I' e . I . o o 11'-0" 2'-8" 3'-6" 28'-0. .0;"'6" 4" O. D~DD LOT 19. UNIT lB I 1f'1I ei € As InS 11'1 I" ty 0 pen -lir.1 ~fl. '.! III Aft'onllalblle Housing lP'roject Eli',. . ~ , ~ ~~ = " .2.W 'j 2.W "@ ~ ~ ::if: IiiiiI ~ IiiiiI IW "'" 3 - a I - , 7'-9" 6'-10" '-3 1/'" 2' 1" ]O~ <> z "\ 0 IG < f); ~ , I - '" I a 0 a '" rO= ~ .... I I "\ '" ~ I <) ~, I ~ 0 'N . 0 '" I 0 . . D III'DO lL.OT 19. UNlLTlB ..w.HIII I I = = I City of Aspen Affonllablle HOWlmg lP'.roject: ~ ~ ~~ ,og "l@ i; "I I Dr- . ~'. ;831;:';::''''~l. : :1::~_ : : L::j:" - --~- :~::'-- :.::~:-,) I IiiiiI i ~ @ og };l .:~ ::. " ~, '" . .. . :f1 L!:::=::l. .' __n....d.n n.'"....__.. -----,------- hU_n_n___ __n_ "'n'_....h. -............ .uhn______ ____. ___h.nn___ .' ",} Y.' . "':.!. '.~'::~::: un.- V'~ - :>~i: DD 1= X;: D t= ,';,; 1= :':" f- ..... ----,,-...... "'_Uh'.._u _____ _n__.h_____ ----.".--... _____un.___ ________u___ ------------- ".n. _______nun __n_..n__n ....--------- _____ __'__U.h.__ -------.'..'-- u___ __n_'n...._. ....---...... .._..'u..._. ___n ____.n...... .......h_n_ n._'_."'____ u___ __.__....hh ------...-.-- u_n_____'_. ____n_n____ n___________ _____ _..nn______ _____h.__+-_ ___n."...._ ________n___ ____nn_____ _no. _______n_.._ _______u_n. ____. ___________n _n_____'____ ___nn___n_ _______n_.n ".... _______n__n '. rn . , IC rn ---c I I D pp DO LOT 19. UNll'J[' B .~...!!l1I I I = il City of Aspm A.ffOlI'dla1blle HOUllsmg lP'roject ,,-\ ~, ~'Ia " - .. "I ; IiiiiI i ~ @ :;g . ,. 0 ffiJ -.-- '. . I-- .' I-- . '. ~ . . . . 0 e-- I-- . - '.' I . '.' . ~ 0 I ~ p DO lL.O'I' 19. UNlL'lI'lB t'r' 11111 I I = ~ I City of Aspen -I ill ii.i~~ Affon:llalbD.e HOllRsmg lP'roject ,-., ^ ~8 i~ 'I ; ~ @ ~ D~DD lLCllT 19.UNll'lr lB City of AspeJm AffoMalblle Housing lProject !ds!r'l f!111I -lii'lli- ill .~. ,~ i; Iiiiil ~ ~ @ ~ :~:..:< . ;;'.~ ;~':.~~ ~ .,,--, r~F:~:- .."" .Ir::[:J1.,.., ,..,.. f:r;rnr~::i;;\'> :: -- ~:: ~ ";:: ~- ''roo :' D I H I DO LOT 19. UNIT lB 'fr i,all I I = ~ I Ciny of A$peml -I 'I sf- ~f II Affmdablle JH[olUlsmg JP'Jroject: ;1 I I~ I I"'" 1"""'\ m t+ .,. --ft! ~~ Iii II ~rOJJ;clI 8~slIll.oH QlI\Cll.1Ei]pl.lJ:oDV II~i j ~ hll! ~11l! .li :J> ..JL'lINO. · '[ Z JI.O'lI !~ii I I"'" r ~,. -~ -- --. I I I I ....Jc;:o=-;:::...~~"~z,.~~- - I I I I I~ ! fQ.f:~ 1Yl!l:" @.II @.. 21~ , L..:-___ __ . ,/__ - ,~ I"'" I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I; I I :J I r !l I I I ~ ~,.__.'--.,,~-"-'----_._--- @. I I I @f: ,~ L I ~ Ir II ~~ I i