Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.Francis St.1987-SR-1 _.~-~.:,. ~ ~ ,-,) i -'2- CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. ) PROJECT Project APPLICANT: Applicant Address: REPRESENTATlVEdI!&0Jl, m~ V ~. Representative Address/Phone: W) 111ii1 ,J '0 ,;fJ-./ 1 o - ~-.i~hJ (kLfl!d~. , /;)3 'i TYPE OF APPLICATION: PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: 1 STEP APPLICATION: P&Z MEETING DATE: PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: 2 STEP APPLICATION: €) MEETING DATE: ~ p/l.i:,>/qPl PUBLIC HEARING: YES@ DATE REFERRED, INITIALS: REFERRALS : city Attorney City Engin~er Housing Dir. Aspen Water city Electric Envir. Hlth. Aspen Consolo S.D. Mtn. Bell Parks Dept. Holy Cross Fire Marshall Fire Chief Roaring Fork Transit School District Rocky Mtn Nat Gas State Hwy Dept(GW) State Hwy Dept(GJ) Bldg:Zon/Inspect Roaring Fork Energy Center Other DATE ROUTED: b-/1~ Sf INITIAL:W/ FINAL ROUTING: City Atty city Engineer Bldg. Dept. Other: STATUS AND LOCATION:~tJ.J:J.1i; FILE '- CAS E DISPOS IT ION : A (, e6.,. j "...,J ~'" ,-', , ., vi.! i<./. , 'J .i,.-, (',",;., l ,(,~,-K ;,), -, - . ~ , ;~ CCi ty Coun~lJ.~ -.------- {",.j .Revit;\~ed by: r,sl'en pf<z . " " ,.',.' ~ ( " I -f - J Ur: \/'t,~'}..: C Jii: / .' II l'V~':1i, I dfIJ/l:!: h.; (""'fl-Of J.~ f: '1, " , I- -' f1 (, (.j'" I/",y"\; P'-'-!."J.)p,J:. ~^. i/'}~i ,. J V ~)j' W tl.;;J'1 ( ),;. ,L.,.j, (< "."^.L,,, 1 A.L M.,,,~ I ii (:I I fJ ; -i, I,' /' (' I~ (,1.\,/: 1<,,' ~.1.....Lf... ,t,j'.) ri.J... (.; ", I /, p, ~ i'~r,.t:/'"1...'.1 P..evie\-lcd By: ;~sp<'2n p&Z Ci ty Council _..,.~... ~ /""".. -. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen City Council Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager steve Burstein, Planning Office~~ Argubright Property: Land Dedication In Lieu of Park Dedication Fee THRU: FROM: RE: DATE: June 4, 1987 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION: The Argubright Property is located. at the end of Francis street approaching the hillside going down to Castle Creek (west of Eighth Street). The parcel includes a fairly large area on top of the mesa and the hillside down to Sneaky Lane, Power Plant Road intersects the property, LAND AREA: 26,267 square feet ZONING: The principal portion of the property is zoned R-6, The area at the bottom of the hillside is zoned R-30(PUD), APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct a duplex on the site which requires a park dedication fee. The purchaser of the property requests the City to accept dedication of right-of-way for Power Plant Road and land for public use in lieu of the Park Dedication Fee. 8,690 square feet would be dedicated to use as right-of-way; and 2,079 square feet would be public open space. APPLICABLE SECTION OF MUNICIPAL CODE: Section 7-143 of the Municipal Code allows City Council to accept either cash payment of the park dedication fee or land dedication in lieu of payment. Paragraph (2)(a) and (b) require for Council's consideration the computation of the cash that would be paid and the current market value equivalent of the land to be dedicated. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The applicant received a consultation opinion regarding market value of the property prepared by Scott Bowie, MAI appraiser, Office of James J. Mollica and Associates, Inc. In this report Mr, Bowie estimated the value of the open space area to be $3,316 and the value of the right-of-way to be $3,465, total gift: $6,781. On June. 3, 1987 Zoning Official Bill Drueding went through an estimate of the park dedication fee using the contract value of the property and the hypothetical size of a duplex on the property to contain two-four (4) bedroom units. Estimated park . #Ii rJ .~ ~. dedication fee is $5,025. Therefore,the gift value would exceed the park dedication fee. If the owner desires greater build-out than two-four (4) bedroom units, then this request for land dedication acceptance should be reconsidered by Council. Noted in Mr, Bowie's report is that a prescriptive easement probably already exists for Power Plant Road, Additionally, the land dedicated is too steep to be developable, However, staff believes there is a benefit to the City to acquire clear right- of-way for a city street, Also the open space at the bottom of the property appears to have some beneficial value to the City as either open space on a fragile and visible hillside or possibly park use. The land dedication effectively divides the property into two parcels, Staff believes this activity qualifies as an exemption from the definition of subdivision under the provisions of section 20-19 (b) . Consequent'ly a subdivision exemption plat should be filed. The only land use issue we believe sho~ld be addressed through the platting process is a building envelope restricting development off the steep hillside. The applicant's representatives and Planning Office have discussed this matter, There is general agreement that the logical building site is on the flat mesa. There is no need to locate the residence on this highly visible hillside as was done in building the Curton Duplex directly south of this property. REcoMMENDED MOTION: "Move to accept land dedication for right-of- way and open space in lieu of cash payment of the park dedication fee as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. In the event that the applicant desires to build greater in size than two-four (4) bedroom units, dedication shall be brought before City Council for ation, a residence this land reconsider- 2. A subdivision exemption plat shall be filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office to the satisfaction of the City Engineer's Office prior to issuance of a building permit, The plat shall include dedication of right-of-way and public open space. and a building envelope demarking the limits of development entirely on the flat mesa portion of the property," CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: sb.argubright r;,' ,-., ROBERTA ALLEN: . . 'MARYjANEANi5ERS0N~ .'~'" ~QA\lID BBERLEY.: SUZANNE r SC:HAU$ .. JANINE.J.: SHARKEY: . THE tpenQ1 CsM l1\~_\" IQ__f_~: Mi"':Srev" 1lur~stEolh' ~..PJ..ann.iIlg~DepartmeIl.t. ~.. 130 South GaleIla.Street Aspen; Colorado 8l6lr Dear 'Steve . I ' . . . - . . Subject; Argtibdgh!\...L6t ~~.En.d...o.LF.xanci.s..S.trppr .:P.as.t:... N!in.th~ - ' i . , . .. . ' 1 In accord.ilIj.ce;wHli' a:fffotif 'fecenf~co'nv'e'r's'aHoIls~~"bnc~osea~please ffridtne' .foHowiIlgQ.ocumeat;s ~per.t..aj,."in"...t.o. .t.he~ .r.:i..gb.t~ .oJ:ry.wa?~ dkd ica t ion. ...i'm:. .Powe:r PlaIlt Road.:and the '!park parcel" west of the proposed r:i.ght of way for uElIld'in;n:eu <l.cparrded[cat[on ~fe.e~.u, u~u ~.~>.~.~u . ~_""'~"'._.-...#-_.,..........~..,. "~_'_"-.-'_'_'_'_''''''-- J,,_._l.....L._..i ~.: . : 1) Retter :fr0m William L. Sharp, the: putch~ser. .-.y.,--.",--..-y --<{"-- +--....,y..__. "'._._..b-. .,>_. __,""__ ......... ,'. .......:......'.... ,_._ ,_ ..:- '0.'" .,,' '._,. .... .....'. "- . : : . 2~ ~egal qes~ription of theright:of;way. .~~:~~:.~~t~~'~3-,k'~llieg,Hdescriptionofthe..pa.r-k'i>areeL ...,. ~u~~~:.~~~'!.->~}>'!.T:.,{e.J7.~oL~t~h~e~.p~roperty. s.!lOwingi both 9f. the aforementione~d.s.art'.as~~~>~ _~uu~. 5. Ownership and encumbrance report (this is actually a copy, of, the title ~~ ~~'~~>~'<;,ommi::l:t1re1ttmrthe' .entire!: Argubhght parcel.. 'sincet~'pn.l.w~e;n-c","6ranGe- . is the U. S, Pat"nt. re~eryad.on). . .... ... .. ..' .... ~coP:i~oT;~c"o;suft~ti';n opinton'regarding market vali.teloi idle 'a'" 'prepared b,r S'cot. t'Bowi:e~~app' rai:sernf-rom:.t.~J"""'f\i"C,,; o.t'- James.J.. J" .. , 1 ' i .:' ,~.L!: . wM()J.~ic:a,.?pcI,~:$:$BfJ~J:~~J~.~!!9 ~ ~~!l:!!:~~~l ~q.~~n4c)};d~e~s~~a~ :r~al~~}~~~en 0 f cash value of the land dedieation. ' , , . 6 ~....,..: ~.~_.~_.~.""._._.j-'~ . .The selle.rof+th+S.~.rQPHtY d!r~, J'lUIl!'!..Ar:g)l~b_rJi..gh:t,~ !'E.PLpEr.c:J:1'!.!'E!r, }:Ir:. _ _1. William, Sh~rp.w}sh: to: give this right of way and: lapdin Heu of parki de.!di-l cat1bnree~specl1'1Ca11ycotrtitigetit 'upon the dosing bi'.:their-pendrng~~.8'r~"~ . OI)~.th.Lsuh" ect~ ptopkrt~. an\! .t.!\?Qn .i.s.s~u.aIlc.cojfa: .b1\~~.d,d..!lg:. P,,!:I]1!L1;C? 1;he!'urkha!seri. ,:. .. .. . .. ...,' ':" ,.' .. " ,. '. '.' ,'-","--, -.-."t.-..-,;,-.:: ,": ~ .;, , ',:, ..:, :'. ., , . .... .,.;" : ,1 i. j.. 1 .: . .. i . j . :~: 'S1jiould~CHy~Couiicil apprOve tnlsa:ppl~C"aFibp a;t i:tsJune 8th~mee't"9F iwe--1W01.dd~~~' ~J~.~. .J~appre.ciate.your sending .us a .c.o.p.y~~o.f. ,t.h.eJ rop.Jl.tia.s.P"!:tgIni:ngt:O l.t..:..' . ;: ,i :, . : " j 1 .. ' . . ' , : , ..: ~ Tt>anTC yoii~ aga :i.n~ for ~ art ~y6uf ~a's"Ts1t'a:"rj~'E' '!in preparing.thls~ap~.lTc'atitl.. rr..~ ~ 'ITu ~ ) , j j , " "". '. ' . . . . . . ~.'.C"~. -"''''''~~' '" _~"""~'~',,^"_"_'" , '( . ~~~.~.+~._." . ~,.- _.~.._,- , ; , 1 , ^':."-~~;--\, --'9"-'=/'='- +"ili._., .. ~_. .". _._~._..._.t.__.,).~. '0.'. ,,',-,-1"--'+-'-- y. .,..s__ ,\,.. .....J. o. _ _, _ _ ,',_ _-J -.~4,-. _.~.....-. _',.,_.._' ~ ,-, May 19, 1987 Aspen City Council 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Dedication of Land Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: I have entered into a purchase contract with wilma Argubright for the purchase of her property (described on Exhibit A) abutting the Power Plant Road. There is pending before you a request to: 1. Accept a right of way dedication of an easement of the road as it abuts the property; and 2. Accept land dedication (in lieu of a park dedication fee) for the triangular parcel west of the road. The road easement is described on Exhibit B; and the road and parcel to be dedicated are shown on Exhibit C, In the event the City Council agrees to accept these dedications, I agree that I will make these dedications to the City of Aspen at the time of building permit issuance, Very truly yours, " ..... ,""'" ~ EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land situated in the NEil of the Swi of Section 12, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado, more fully described as follows: Commencing at a point which is the intersection of the Aspen Townsite line between Corners 6 and 7 and the North line of Smuggler Street whence the center, corner of said Section 12 (which is the brass cap in place) bears s. 63" 49'30" E. 361.55 feet; thence S. 7"38' w. 335.18 fe~t along said Aspen Townsite line to its intersection with the prolonged centerline of Francis Street, said intersection point' being the true point of beginning; thence N. 75" 07' W. l87i.Sl feet; thence N, 3" 58' E. 150.22 feet; thence S, 75" 07' E. 197,20 feet; thence S. 7" 38' 9.80 feet; thence N, 75" 09'11" W. ,20,02 feet; thence S. 7" 38' w. 100.80 feet; thence S. 75" 09'll~ E. 20.02 feet; thence S. 7" 38' w. 37.66 feet to the true point of beginning. ... County of Pitkin, State of Colorado , 04/SD9 I'"'" 1'""'. Alpine Surveys, Inc. 414 North Mill Street Post Office Box 1730 Aspen. Colorado 81612 303 925 2688 May 18, 1987 80-93-2 Argubright Right-of-Way DESCRIPTION A 60.00 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY SITUATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH P. M., CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO AND BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND AS [3SCRIBED IN BOOK 230 AT PAGE 448 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY rECORDS WHENCE ASPEN TOWNSITE CORNER NO.6, A SAND STOKE, BEARS N 23"07'59" E 604.08 FEET; THENCE S 75"07' E 60.11 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE; TEENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE S 18"22' W 64.98 FEET; THENCE 51.61 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 497.00 FEET THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 21"20'30" W 51.59 FEET; THENCE 32,03 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 176.50 FEET THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 29"30'58" W 31.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID CERTAIN TRACT; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY AND WESTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID TRACT N 75"07' W 47.11 FEET AND N 03"58' E 31.74 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID THE ARC OF A CURVE TO 116.50 FEET THE CHORD 9.82 FEET; THENCE 45.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 437.00 FEET THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 21"20'30" E 45.36 FEET; THENCE N 18"22'00" E 61.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 8690 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. WESTERLY THE LEFT OF WHICH BOUNDARY 9.82 FEET HAV=NG A RADIUS OF BEARS N 26044'02" E ALONG "'" ^.. ,-. ,'-". Alpine Surveys, Inc. 414 North Mill Street Post Office Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 2688 May 18, 1987 80-93-2 Argubright Area Westerly of R.O.W. DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6TH P. M., CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO AND MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 230 AT PAGE 448 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS WHENCE ASPEN TOWNSITE CORNER NO.6, A SAND STONE, BEARS N 26013'20" E 609.73 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT OF LAND S 75007' E 33.20 FEET: THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE S 18022' W 61.32 FEET: THENCE 45.38 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 437.00 FEET THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 21020'30" W 45.36 FEET; THENCE 9.82 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A COUMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 116.50 FEET THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 26044'02" W 9.82 FEET TO TEE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT 0F LAND: THENCE N 03058'00" E 118.04 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 2079 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. <: .. ,,-..,. ,,-.., , 'Z~. Aspen/Pit,;>;,..:. .. . .;'"~Jlping Office ..r~ ". .. ,." .. ". 130 S Q'U:t.h).ga.l e i1 a :'.s t r e e t ,~.. . .. .', . .. . asp e n '~;!,"C 01 <> r ado 81611 ""'~j,'" April 22, 1987 Lorrie B. Moss The Real Estate Office of Aspen LTD 601 E. Hyman Ave, suite 101 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Lorrie, This letter is in response to your April 9, 1987 letter in which you. have requested consideration of several concerns regarding the Argubright Lot at the end of Francis street past 9th street. Following are my comments: 1. It would be desireable for the city to obtain a right-of-way for Power Plant Road through the Augubright Lot. The Engineering Department has not had the chance yet to comment on the width of right-of-way desired, with regard to your request to be able to use the area dedicated to city r,o.w. for calculation of FAR, I cannot think of a way by which you can achieve this objective, Once the property is no longer part of the lot, the existing lot area would dictate the FAR calculation, Even after subtraction of area for the r.o,w. (currently repesented to be 26,267 s,f.) it is hard to say that a reasonably sized duplex could not be built. 2. section 7-143 of the Municipal Code (attached) explains the provisions for park dedication fee and making application to city council for land dedication in lieu of payment. Paragraph (2) (a) and (b) requires computation of the cash that would have been required and the current market value equivalent of the land to be dedicated for council's analysis, This information should be provided in an application to be submitted through the Planning Office. For consideration of both road dedication and land dedication in lieu of park dedication fee, location of the road (centerline) and identification of "park" parcel must be accurately located on a survey, From my initial analysis, I would encourage you to make this application, as it would appear to be acceptable to Council. This survey information is also necessary for the calculation of FAR. . .,~ ,1"- 1""".. .1""". ~ 3. Based on my visit to the site, I would strongly encourage the developer of this property to build entirely on the flat portion of the site (on the mesa). The hillside above Castle Creek is an environmentally and visually sensitve area. Development on the hillside would be subject to stream margin review if within 100 feet of the high water line of Castle Creek, according to section 24-6,3, We cannot ~etermine at this time whether development is or not subject to this review as the development plans have not been viewed in relation to proximity to the Creek. Even if it is not a stream margin review, we encourage you to stay off the hillside. I hope that this letter answers your questions. If you have any more questions, please contact me, sincerely, steve Burstein, Planner sb.441 I UIT'~'! LOc.111un 4 T';ll1sactlOl1 Code '} E:ndor~('mcnt Code 2 Dal~ Jnco",,,, Reponed 5 L'ilb,lIty 8 El1d(li$l~ment Charge 3 Ca;:oe Numb!.H 6 Charge ~l TOlil1 Revenue ,.,..... ~-f -L____.l~ 10 SIil1e Code ,1 County Code 12 Pr"perlytype 1"'"'\. 13 Source ot BU$iness 14 Cumm'sSlon RetentIon '. CQ,MMITMENT: I: [3 Efr 11 13 I" kwyers lltle InsuranceC9rporation National He'adquarters Richmond, Virginia COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date MARCH 26,1987 @ 8:00 A.M. Case No. PC1'-17R-R7 2 Policy or policies to be issued: (al xf*I ALTA Owner's Policy-Form B-1970(Rev. 10-17-70& Rev. 10-17-84) o ALTA Residential Title Insurance Policy-1979 Proposed insured: WILLIAM SHARP Amount $ 167, SOO 00 WITH PREMIUM OF $576.00 TAX CERTIFICATE $ 5.00 (b)ALTA Loan Policy, 1970 (Rev. 10-17-70& Rev. 10-17-84) Proposed, insured: Amount $ (c) Proposed insured: Amount $ 3 Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: WILMA LEE ARGmBRIGHT 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: PLEASE REFER TO EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. Pitkin County Title, Inc. E. H s. (303)925-1766 n 01 0 81611 Commitment No. BE-22S,12 Schedule A-Page 1 This commitment is invalid unless the Insuring Provisions and Sched- ules A and B are attached. ORIGIN!\.L ~. j /"""', r'-, fu.,wyers Title Insurance (9rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE A cont'd. LEGAL DT';f,CIHl'TION 1\ tract of land situated in the NEt of the swt of Section 12, Township 10 ~iouth, Hllnge 85 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Pi tldn County, Colorado, more fully described as follows: Commencing at a point which is the intersection of the Aspen Townsito line between Corners 6 and 7 and the North line of Smug- gler Street whence the center corner of sllid Section 12 (which is the brass cap in place) bears S. 630 49030" E. 361.55 feet; thence ~.:. 7038' W. 335.18 feet along said Aspen Townsite line to its in- tersection with the prolonged centerline of Francis Street, said interse~tion point being the true point of beginning; thence N. 750070 W. 137.51 feet; thence N. 3058' E. 150.22 feet; thence S, 7500"I'E. 1q7.:~O feet; thence S. 7038' W. 9.80 feet; thence N. 750 OB'1.1" W. 20.02 fect; thence S. 7038' W. 100.80 feet; thence S. 75009'11" E. 20.02 feet; thence S. 703[)' W. 37.66 feet to the true point of beginning. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Schedule Page No. O:35'1-999.004()''2 OH1Gif':!\L litno '" U,S,A. .. 1""'\ 1""'\ l!Lwyers TItle Insurance (9rporation National Headquarters Richmond. Virginia SCHEDULE B-Section 1 Requirements Tl1e following are the requirements to be complied with: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-wit: (1). Deed from to WILMA LEE ARGUBRIGHT WILLIAM SHARP (e). Release by the Public Trustee Deed of Trust from for the use of to secure dated recorded reception no. of the County of Pitkin of: JOHN G. O'BRIEN AND MARY E. O'BRIEN GRANGE INVESTMENT COMPANY $25,000.00 October 13, 1964 October 16, 1964 in Book 209 at .Page 449 118961 (d). Certificate of Nonforeign Status of Individual Transferor signed by Transferor. (e), Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) has been paid or exempted. This commitment is invalid unless the Insuring Provisions and Sched. ules A and B are attached. Form No. 91-88 (8-1) 035-'-088-0001/4 Schedule 8-Section 1 ~Page 1 -Commitment No. OR~r:,\I,,\,'\t " 1"'. (""'\ fu.wyers lltle Insurance (9rporafion NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-Section 2 Exceptions The policy or policies fa be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same ore disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of pattiesinponession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims "feasements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in orea, encroachments, and any facts which a cOrrect survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records, 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, im- posed by low and not shown by the public records. 5. Defecfs, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other mattei's, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attoching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the dote the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate Or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, imposed for water or sewer service, special assessments, charge or lien or for any other special taxing district. 6. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded December 3, 1892 in Book 55 at Page 35 as follows: right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises. Exceptions numbered NONF: are hereby omitted. lhe Owner's Policy to be issued, if any, Shall contain tne following Hems in addilion 10 the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule 8-Section 1, Item (b). (2) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in potents or in Acts Quthorizing issuance thcreof; watcr rights, claims or tille to water. (3) Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax soles. Schedule B-Section 2-Poge I-No. Form 91.8882 Rocky Mt. 035.1.088.0504 I'~ .~. '" ....." . . . kw>0s litle Insurance C9Tf^~tion National Headquarters Richmond. Virginia COMMITMENT FOR TITlE INSURANCE LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, .in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred toin Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges,therefor; all subject tothe provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall b~ effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the poHcyor policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereofbythe Company, either at the time oftheissuance ofthis Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of suchpoHcy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date .hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue; whichever first occurs. provide~ that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company, This Commitmemt shall not b~)'~Udqr~inding,Y,~tHcountersigned byan a.uthorized officer or agent. ',:",:;:,:;_;,;\;::;{V'!~:?:'!'<'!\('''''','' -,"' - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this ~qmm;tm~r;t'to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agenfofttl6';':C,o'mj:iaI1Y~:alJjJn,accordance with its By~Laws. This Commitment is C', """ ' 'X.'i),C' -""}"'<"!~"':'",'<~""f~k ''t''I effective as of the date shown in Schedule A;lS; "Eff"jiti~f;~i!l'7;~;J ';; r: ii,1, .',~';' ',\~t ' ~B;:::)rC +:;9:* ,j; CON.DITIONsiiAI\ID STIPULATIONS .",;, '" ~1 "(.\.i:" ."'~'~': :',1, "',,",,,,; ":" 1. The term "r:nortgage," when used herein),.-shall jncJud~;d~ed q,t trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. ;:;;.:" .\' 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or(b)toeliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such .liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring ag'ainst the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. Jmvyers lItle 11l8ur"F @rporatlon .07MC'. ~~ President Attest: A~~ .2- Secretary. ~ \. ,t'""\ ~ James J. MoJlJca & Associates, lu~ Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants Crysta,l Palace Building. 300 East Hvman Avenue. Aspen, Colorado 81611 .303/925.8987 May 26, 1987 Ms. Jane Jenl<ins c/o Mr. Bill Sharp . 595 Cemetery Lane Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Consultation on the Argubright Property, Ciry of Aspen, 926 West Francis Street, Aspen, Colorado Dear Jane: At your request, we are writing tlm brief letter to assist you and the City of Aspen in allocation of some values, in, regard to a park dedication fee on the subject property. please note that this brief letter does not constitute an appraisal. Although we will arrive at some suggested value conclusions, their nature makes it necessary to rely more, on logic and judgment than upon sales comparison. This letter does not include formal analysis or description of the property typical of an appraisal report in which value conclusions are drawn from market comp~n. We offer our conclusions merely as an aid from an independent source in resolution of the questions oudined below. The problem involved, oudined to us, is, along the following lines: The Argubright property is under contract to Mr. Sharp for $167,500. The property falls principally within the R-6 zone with a small sliver of land approximately 2,079 square feet falling within the R-JO zone. It is the City's policy that the more restrictive of the twO zoning categories shall apply' to th,e entire parcel. Mr. Sharp is buying the parcel to construct a duplex, which he believes ,to be its highest and best use, There is sufficient land on the bench adjacent to Francis Street to build a duplex within the R-6 guidelines. However, if the City considers the entire parcel to be zoned R-30, the site is substandard at 26,267 square feet in the R-30 zone and is too small to support a duplex in tlm zoning categoty where 30,000 square feet is required for duplex constnlct1on. Mr. Sharp proposes to gift the 2,079 square feet of land lying in the R-30 zone to the city as well as easement across an 8,690 square foot parcel where the Power Plant Road is now located. It is probable that a prescriptive easement already existS across this property for the road, but we understand no fowal easement has been issued to the City. In return for that gift, Mr. Sharp would rid himself of land lying in the R-JO zone leaving the entire remaining zoned R-6and capable of duplex Scott M.8owie. M.A. I. Randy Gold, M.A.I. James J. Mollica, M.A.'. 1"', r->. , construction. He also would like, for the gift, to offset patk dedication fees for duplex construction should the value of the gift exceed the calculation of those fees. We are being asked several questions: 1. Is the value of the parcel consistent with its contract price of n67,500? 2. What is the value of the gift of the 2,079 square foot parcel and the easement across, the 8,690 square foot parcel, and does this offset or more than offset the calculated patk dedication fees? 3. Is there a quantifiable benefit to Mr. Sharp in gifting. the 2,079 square foot parcel because the gift effectively establishes a zoning category with higher. density across the remaining property? . The first question involves the value of the parcel as a whole. The property has been available on the matket for an extended time at $215,000. There is strong matket activity in the West End for compa"able bqilding sites although few capable of duplex construction have been purchased for such development, Rather, they have been bought for single faIllily construction with the advantage of having a legal caretaker or guest unit, However, all are located in the superior area of the West End with greater privacy and prestige. We feel the subject site is viable both .in its location, neighborhood, and price category for duplex construction. That would be consistent with other uses in the immediate area. From our most recent transactions, the contract price of $167,500 would appear to approximate matket value.' The' whole property is 26,267 square feet. The contract price would reflect a value for the site of approximately $6.38/SF. . The second question involves valuation of the individual land .parts. The map supplied to us suggests that there is approximately 15,498 square feet of land lying on the upper bench adjacent to Francis Street, the logical building envelope. Another band of land runs down the hillside and totals approximately 8,690 square feet across which the Power Plant Road now runs. The lower, triangular sliver of land contemplated for the gift is approximately 2,079 square feet. and lies on the hillside between Power Plant Road and Sneaky Lane below. There is no question thai' the principle value of the site lies in the level portion of the property adjacent to Francis" Street. Under the R-6 Zone, 9,000 square feet of this 15,498 square feet of relatively level land is needed for duplex construction. The rest of the land on the parcel, approximately 17,267 square feet, would be considered excess land. Excess land contributes to the primaJ:y building envelope in terms of privacy, floor area ratio, yard area, the ability to be more creative architecturally in the layout of the structure, nuisance value relative to neighbothoodhomeowners, etc. However, loss of this land or a portion of it will not affect densitY or its principle use. It is logical to us that the remainder of the level portion of the site James 1 Mollica << ,Issoclale~ In~ Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants ,~ .~ .~ , over and above the 9,000 square feet needed for duplex construction (under R-6) would have the greatest value of this excess land, perhaps as much as 50% of the ~6.38/SF the property shows as a whole. The steeper land has inferior value and we have judged that to be roughly 25% .of the value per square foot of the whole site. Thus, the 2,079 square foot, triangular sliver now zoned R-30 will have a value of roughly: 2,079 square feet x $6.38/SF x 25% = ~3,316 . A portion of the land on which the easement will be gifted is approximately 8,690 square feet. It is probable that the easement would not encompass this eritireportion of the property but for convenience sake we have considered the whole portion as easement gift. This portion of the land we also feel contributes roughly 25% of the value of the whole parcel. However, an easement is being gifted and not fee ownership of the land. The easement will take away surface rights of the land and effectively sterilize the use of the land in the location of the easement. Nevertheless, we recognize an easement already effectively exists there and that the road easem~nt will not take up all the portion of this property, Thus, we have picked a somewhat arbitrary, but we feel logical, number of 25% for further reduction in the value of this easement. Thus, the easement value would be shown as follows:. 8,690 square feet x ~6.38/SF x 25% = ~13,860 x 25% further reduction = ~3,465 Total value of the gift: Fee land: 2,079 SF = Easement across 8,690 square feet = ~3,316 3.465 Total gift: 16,781 Rounded: 16,800 The reader could effectively argue that the loss of this sliver of land and the easement across steep land does not materially affect the value of the remainder of the land. However, we would point out that every man is entitled to compensation for the loss of his property or any of the rights which belong to that property. He is losing FAR potential, a small degree of privacy, and, in the case. of the triangular sliver, a portion of the land itself. These are rights of ownership which require compensation. We feel our calculation of the value of those rights is conservative enough to be realistic given the quality of the land and its contribution to the value of the whole. We also remind the council that although it is probable that a prescriptive easement. exists acrc>ss the property, it may require substantial legal expense to insure that prescriptive easement. A gift is intended to free the City from. that expense. We understand from Mr~ Drueding of the Building Department that calculation of the park dedication fee for a duplex on the subject site would be slightly in James 1 Mollica ~ Assoclale~ Inc. Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants ". I'" , ,-"" excess of $4,000. Thus, the gift of the easement and the 2,079 square foot portion of the parcel would appear to more than offset that parle dedication fee. The third question is whether there is, a benefit to Mr. Sharp in the gift of the parcel because it frees him of the lower density R-30 zoning across the property. The council will have to decide whether, in fact, any substantial benefit is -really accruing to Mr. Sharp from this gift. It has always been our understanding that it was not the City's intention to divide properties by zoning boundaries. The 2,079 square foot parcel zoned R-30 represents less than 8% of the size of the parcel_as a whole. It would appear that its R-30 zoning is more a question of error than intent. The building envelope was zoned R-6 presumably to conform to the properties in the neighbothood. It is logical to assume the intention was that the structure built on this property would be built to R-6 zoning requirements and that the structure would fall on the mesa adj acent to Francis Street. The sliver of land zoned R-30 is the greatest distance on the parcel away from this logical building envelope. We would assume that it was not the intention of - zoning placed across the property to . effectively create a spot zone of R-30 surrounded by R-6 properties at the end of Francis Street. The council will have to determine how it would examine a formal application to have this property rUled R~6, It would seem logical to us that suchan application wo"ld be viewed favorably by the council and that .a gift of the 2,079 square foot parcel would allow the City an easy way to rectify an error in the zoning boundaty. I hope this letter is sufficient for your needs at this time. If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call.. Sincerely, ~~~ Scott M. Bowie" M.A. 1. Appraiser-Consultant James J. Mollica t! Associates, IDC, Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants I / / ~ I'" "". ~ If") , / ! . '. ~--"-"--~l"- t ----.,. ",: ...~ I ~: ___~'~'';;'~'!< . .~~ ---.-~-"-':~~:':~ ." ..... . ,', . '. . . . ." . 0/. ; ~ ",-"'. ," '< < ." ~ ':~-~~ "' o ". "''';fl' )StI~3~~~ UJ":'~Zj~"'~" ><~> S' e Il(. ":Ii: "q" ;:) ~ ~ -:-f#...;;(:. .f"t. ,l'.) ~ fl.;.: t. 'II _"S ~ _, ; ~ ,. ~ : {, ~ ~, " , ~ ~'.~.. -':"'..y... .,. ~ oJ.., I .,...."'~ '-4.~~;......'(; ..__ , : , , , ~ fi~ ~ rJ' !~ /" . < --.::--.----..----="" ,.... J; '-,<:.,.=::-:---.~._~ ' . . '''''''' ~o""""< _. __ "_... '., ~, . '. . . t ~ , " ~ . , ,. , I r , . ~ , t i t >, j ~ '- ~ '" ~ '" ~r '" ,~ ~~ 11"'. ..... ,0 ~ . \ -'~ -II ~r .iilS "'" ~~ ~""",<~,<;,P' ....,/~. '"7 :lI.~.~ .o...,~'':..:...,~....> -010", ""-"'"'<< "') ~.~ ....'="<I..'.:.,..&:> ~ .... ...... ".~ ":';'-'-:>.;;.7;';';';" ''.Q-..~~." ....... i< ...,............ '.'';-;-' ..... ....... ..... ......,..... ...... , ~~ >:: :... . ~~"" '<IV:::,;:.''''' '" --...-- --...--... ---,~ '~';I.)------.. ---... - ---... '-... ~ ~ .......~.> ........-..;:............ .~. '......... ~.~.~ .,,~ ~.... ...... ....... 1 / ....... ~ "'" ".'. ..... "'. ..... ...... .... ".. .... '~ \i ~ ..':I;<:o:~~.":.,.,'~ ;~~ ~....... (.r.",-,,;Cn,~;.n_-,.....:J) -'t'...., .(~...)zz~ "3.~.~fV .~. .. .~~... "', , I j I i i I I " h ~< ~I .4::- ~'~ , , Or O' Ii "'"'''--~ '.I ,"~.i..' '---' , ~ .~ 1 .~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ f :~ ~ ", f ~ :\ ,.\ 'jl ,~ "'1 ~ , .~ " A, :.~ ~~ ~ 1::; , , ~ 01 , , ,;; "~ 1 , , .: , , , i ~ ~ < -. . .-, , QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER Scott M. Bowie, M.A.I. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, M.A.I. #6848 Instructor, University of Colorado Continuing Education Division Licensed Real Estate Broker in the State of Colorado Member of the Upper Colorado Board of Realtors Member of the National Board of Realtors EDUCATION: Harvard University, BA, 1971. Phi Beta Kappa, Magna Cum Laude University of Colorado Continuing Education Division: Real Estate Law; Real Estate Finance American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers: Course I-A, Principals; Course 2, Urban Properties; Course VIII, 'Residential; Course l-B, Capitalization Techniques; Course VI, Evaluation Procedures BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE: Appraiser-Consultant, James J. Mollica & Associates, Inc., 8/76-present Colorado Real Estate Broker: 1974-present . Condominium Property Management: Durant Condominiums, Aspen, CO 1971-1976 Designated M.A. I.: March, 1984 MAJOR CLIENTS SERVED: Aspen Skiing Co, Bank of Aspen First National Bank in Aspen Aspen Savings & Loan City of Aspen First Western Mortgage Ute City Mortgage County of Pitkin Empire Savings TYPES OF PROPERTY APPRAISED: Commercial, Office & Retail Special Purpose Buildings Subdivisions-Vacant Land Lodges-Hotels Ranches-Farms Industrial Residential Apartments . Condominiums PURPOSES OF APPRAISALS: Acquisition Condemnation Insurance Estate Planning Mortgage Tax Planning STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION: The American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers conducts a voluntary program of continuing education for its designated members. MAl's and RM's who meet the minimum standards of. this program are awarded periodic education certification. I am certified under this program through September 15, 1987. James J. Mollica d Associale~ Inr. Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants '''''\,,; .. ....... "","\>:-':,.;''<:",,:-,'r::;:',::':o.;, eX, r ~ DD'IlltIOl rif">>Dar'iIoII', HarIr.eIoV~\le1,'",:tb., llajor t~~~'~'t<:.().t';;..i. propertJ_"apprU'Hl uaJ.p.n~.. Both ecol'lQl1o and hgd 'd.tln1t:J;onaof aarkot: ,YUUfI _,hn" *i:l ,doeJv"loped<~blIl:'r,.rJ.Il.d,. ",:(:oD;t1J:lu.alr.t1n...nl:. 1. euent1alto the SI"Qwtbotth.e appr':i..l,pro~..~,o~ Tb.cw-re~t;.conco1o'd.tlnH1C1h ot'llUket. v&lu. can be .~~ .. tollowa: " , ",' :><> , ......,:. . .......,.:...,......:.::..,.:' The' Iloat probabh,prl~ :111 oU.ll,ter:u eq~Y&lent,to '~.b";':",;,.',i~' ~~;'Pr~J."lJ""Nled to.rae, tor "b1ob. the &PPr';&1"4 -proport)' 'IIU1'.d1::1D,' Of*'P't-utive aark.t,\lI1c1.r.U-GOndlt~:on.l req\l1.ite tofUI' ade, \11th the bU.fO!" and aeller '&CIl.ot1DiPr\ldeQtll.knowl~da:eab11" and t:~r adt...lnte:r,at,iand, ..al.lia1na that. ne1ther 10 underWlc1U11chlreaa."fUndaaental uO\ap.tionaand.'co.nditJ.ona pr'.~edinth1adet.1D1Uon "I'll; (1) Buyer andealler areaoUvat..:1. b)'aelt:",intereatl:(2),Bu)'er"and .eller are we1l1ntoraeda.oct are act.1t1iPrUd.ent.lYI (3), Tho pro:pert7 1. e;xpo.-ed tor a"euonable U.eont.be:opetlllW"ketl (4) Pall1enti6 m.d.ein c&sh, it.1lI eQ.uivalent, o.rinopec1tiedt1nanc1ns hrm.oj(S) Speoitied ttn:ancJ.n'h 1.t &l1J', :IDaY be the f1nanc:inaac:tualJ.y in plaC8-Ol'ontel"llls Senerally. ava1laW.. tor,thOprOpuot7t1pe il1,ita lonale on the et.rect.ive.ppraJ.aalaat.ej(6)Thaattect, 1t&ll1,:ontho &IllO\Ultot urket vel..- or.t.ypical r1natlc1l'1i,Mrvicea, or fo.. all;all .be~oar11.ano p"ec1aeJ.lr..ea1e41Jl. tho .ppra1ea1 report. ("e"tcu InaUt\lteor Rfllal E.t.ateAppraiaer.,'l'h... .1''''1.....111111 nr ROIRt Ih"ht.l!!l. 8th ed." ,(,Ch.tQ&601 Aaerican1zl,aUtUh of' Rnl f:.stata Appraisers,: .1983),. 33.J ";, CUfIrlc:.lTmI,Tbe Apprai.er cerUt1uani1 age.tbatl 1. The Appre..1ser ~&I i:lopre~nt orooDtemplAt.e4 tuture .int.oro~,t1D th;' prOpert7, appru..d i and neUber the eapl01110nt to lGaket.haappra1aal,JlOr t..b,a o~penaaUon tOr it,la,oon~nSeDtu!)On the appra1.eo u.1\MI ot' t.he propert.y. ',. .. ... ,..',....""..",..... . 2. The Appraber hun~ peraonallnt.re'at1n or bluw1t.h ~~p.l'C~,:.t~.'tb~.:.ubJ~~~ ..tt.er<<'tb...~pra1_l report. 01' tho part.icipant. tetb. aale... ~..Eat.1l1&t:e etHarket.Yal,l.lC!l.iD.th..jlPl'&iaall'eport !a not. b&1le;<1 in 'Wboleor in ,part. upon the race ,.00.10..1', or na t.1enal ol'1.g1n Qt t.b.'presJltlct1.e: :owaera 0..1' opcupantll or the property. appr&1sed, oruj)O.Q. the race,' oolor or Dationa.l ori~tl .ot t.hePr'.H,tlt QWner. or o..CC\l~nh otttle prepOrtiu 1n the v1ci111ty ott.he propert.y apprabec1. . . ... . .' 3. Unless ot.berw1se' ao...te41ntho'. body. or the repOrt~'th.'APpra1ae~'haa .perZiol1&ll1 inllpectod tbe ,proper~y, botb inlUdeanc out... 10 the but of the AppraJ...r'aknowledge .atldbeUet, aUatat.caenta aad, 1ntoMllation' in th1a roportaretrueaoocorroct, '.' and thaAppra1aer' baa not. knOWj,rl&lyNit.bhela an)' .1&nitlC&rlt1nlo.....Uon. 1(. All contlngent' ",nd i1la1tll'l&ciO~1UOD.s'~'., OOJ1ta1ne4.h.~d~'(.lIIj)C)lI.d . or'. '~~. ". t.~.' ot' the'. auJ.,.ant or by t.he un4.rbi~e4 aCrectlns the and1aea,.' ~JI1n10n.I.:.nd .ClO.Q.cJ.l.l,1I.10;,na,~,nta1ne41n't.he, report). 5. Tb1l5appra1u.lreportha.o be.nucein contOMlllty'w1tb 6nd,is al.lbJecttot.he roqw.r.enta oCth. Code af Pratea&1anaJ.' Et.hics and: 'Stan4~a'o.c :'. Protu:uob&l.Praot.1ca, or ..~.,,.er~can .Inatitute..ot ,R.al E.!!t.at.e Appra1aer.!!. ' 6. All cpnc.lua10ns .n4op1.n.1onll cOJ1CfII'n1ri,eth. realutate that'.r. aetrort.h 'ln tb. appraisal report were Prepared by theAppra1aerNhoaea1gnature appeara OQ the apPl'e1uJ.,report, WellS lncU.oated aa'.aeview ,Appra1atlr.'lIo...ohanseor aD)'..1t.Ul '10.. th..ppra.1aal. report.,ahaU. tie.. lIade.bY..DlOrlOotber.. than' t.h.. Appn1aer. and' the Ap,praiaer 3haU bave, 1;0..... rN~Wb17~,t)'t~'any,aucb,:.' ~Ut.bC?l"b~,cbarl$.," COItDGlllt. AD J..Dm'DIQ. CODItIOU; '.The oerUtic.aUo,n ot the Appra1aa,.- appearln, in theapPI'a1aal report i. ~~bjeQt.to.. the tellowlns;coDdlt1o~a &ndtoaucb~ther .pecltlc>aDd'lialt1n&'ooDdltio~a. ar.aetforth by the Appra.1aer in tnereport. '..., ..... .... '.' .. .'.' . 1. The Appraiser as:.n.lllu 110.. 'l'upon:ubll1 t.y . tor: utter.!!. ot .~... i~&al' rlature'~;ectln.a:" tbe property appra1:ied or tne t.itle thereto.., nor doea'~eAppra1aerrender anyopln1oD 'aa. to the' title,wh1ch1s aaaumed to be lOod ano Auleetable. The pro..pert1.1,aajlpra1oe4 aathol.lgb.under .reapona1ble. ownerablp,:and '..nageaent.. 2. Any. ak. toll 'in . t.he rel'Ort..1 '.bow ~PproX1.. toe dJ.lllenaJ.oOl 'aDd: laJ.nolu.ced,t.o'. ...bt. t.h,trea4trin 'liaual1dng. the property. Tha' Appl'U.IIer .hq'lIaoeuo Ol.ll'vey'ottbe' proper.~1. <"":"'.," ...:.....'.'...,.. c......... 3.TheAppra1"r1a not, requ.1zoec1 tOg1l'e, tesUIIIO.D,Y'or appear in court l>ecaua.ot ha.v1nglGad.. the. appra1aal 'Witb reference. t.o.. theproper~y lnqueaUoA,'unleao arrange.ente hll'lebee.Q prev10ualr 1lI&4etheretor. . "C. :, . .: .' .,....,. ..cc.............,:' "> :'....... .... , " 4. 'An1dhtribut1o..not the nl,uation ln the report. bet.Neenl.adana J.lllproveaenta :.PPl1eaonlY uQCiar the edat.ing, progralllot ut.1Uzat1on. The Mparate valuat1oliato..r latld.:atld.bulldlns;lIuat QO~'b.Wled '111 cenj\mCUo..o with &n1 other..pprai.u.1,and.ar:e inv-.l14ltao \leed. . , , ^ 5. 'rbe A.ppraiaer' aU\IIl.a .Pi~'t ..t.here . ara'nobldo,u:r.. ~r . ~napparant cOn4i t.101US ..ot.. the pl'epert.1 f lnQluc11ng blott notlia1tooto subso..l1 probl..a, atruoturald.~lclencie5,~0n1n&.Ddbuilding'cod.in~oapllance, Nh1cbNOuld rencer it lIIorO orlelS6 val\l&ble. 'the Appraiaer, u:t.\IIlU noreapona1bllH)'forauch. COnditiona, or. tor On&1neerina: whlch .~t ,be, req,U1r.ct t0c11"CI()n.rauch,tact.ora. ' 6. ,IntorNt1on, elStiute", 'aDd oP1nionllturr:r.bbed, t.o' tho. Appra1it.r,.ano. coot&1nod .'In tJ:r... r.pOr.t" were obt.1ned.frOlllaoW'cu' cowdered. rellable and believed: to. be tr\le andcarrect. . Hove:ver,' norupon4J.bH1ty tor acourac)' ot5\lci11t.aturtl1aheo the' Appra1ael'O&n b.' ua\D&d by' th.. Appra1aer. 7 .D1oo1oauuo..C' th.cont..nt.ottbe:'~Jl"~'d"'l'r.portla go..U;~ bJth..aJlalla aDd aecul.Uona ot, the iaarlcanbatJ.tut.ot Real Katat.eApprel..ra. " ',.::,'::, .."'.,'-'.' ", " ;'.' ': .... ........ :',;: .<' ",:'. ,.",' . '.,' < :,<"" ", ': ,~ 8. lIeitherall, Dor a.D7 part ott;h.cc)I:r.t.nt'ot tbereport,;oroopy th.reat (1ncll,lding conolua.1o..na u to the property 'alue, tb.ld.~t.1tl ot theAppr.a1dl', ". prote.aJ.onala..1snat1orlar. referoDOe'to. an)" pr:otuuonal appr.1nl orpn1Ut1olUl,ortAe,t1"',,,,itb Nt:r.1d:r. 'the,},pP:"a1aer' h"connect~), lb.:Ll. be.. uoeO'tor. &111... purpoMa 01 ll.llrOtlt b~,t tbeol1ent apoo,1.tl.e41A.the repor,~":.t.4e,bQrro,,.r1t ,apPl'a1H.1"t... P414:bl.....,th. .ort""8..or its auccea.or and .aaigno,aortgaga InaW'e,."QOtlault:ant.a,pr,ot."a1ol:r.al ,appraJ.aal,:orpn1zat1ons,&n)'atate or f.derally 'approvedt1nanc1&l'lnatitou.t1on, &nyd.partment., a;8On07.:<"or' .'1nat.ru.ad:ntal:1t.)" otthe Ua1te4 Stat.. or &nystat.e or tbe Dbtrjct.<ot Collllll~a,;lIi thout the prev10u.a..,I'.1ttenconaeot otUje.4ppraborloor:m.J.llt. be conveyed bY..anyo..ne.. t.o'.the .publ1othroU&h,acl.ve,rt1ai~,. pUbU,c,rolaUOirllSJ:,nowa":aale., . or. other ..cU., .witbout. tn. wr1t.tenoonaent alld. appt'oval otthe .Appra.1aer., ' 9. . On all appra1aalal JlubJutto..tiataotOl'7.' coapiet1ont,J'.pt.i~,:.'''''::a1t~rau.~'~a, . tbeappr&1aal 'report aDd value. .coMlua1on ar.econt.lngent, upon,COlllplet10Q'ot the .iaprOv....Dh .1D"..,Wol'kaaAllke....annel'.: 1 O.zOntD{S .1n' t.he Aapen'&r~::1a' 1D~~,llat.ant.t~t.'.~' 'Cbanae. '~~~n<POJ:t1~~' ot th..oa1D& and latll1. '1.1.. code are opc.n .te 1nt.,erpreta.t.1on, aDd the outcome ot anyappl1cation 1aaubJectto,o..vernment.appronJ.. The lppraher baa .ade~evel'Jettort.t.o ldent.1tytheae 1uuu:aIld. thelr- appl1oatJ..on t.o the ,aubJect. . Hcwnar, . th. lppraJ.aerual8ea DO reapol:r.a1b1l1ty tord1tt1cu.lt.1ea in In,terpre,t&t1on ot or ch&ll&e.' 1l:r. t.he lacd. 1.1_ code. , / / " , / / ! . -- / //" / /// -:;/;/ .~/< " f' / // , / /' ~ ,./ /. _/".~ .--// ..,/ .. ,.'/ .. y // ;/' /'--/'./' , ;,' "'" / ./..,...' ;,/ . /" --,'-- ,/'/ // -~ /' . ,./ // ,/' /'" .,./ /" " " / / ./" ./ /./ / ,./ , // />":,< ','/ ...../' /.// / /,/., / ~ /' /- ,./ .,.... . '// > /' '/" "~;' -,------ //,.;//'-: .-:/" / /- /:;;;;:;~\~/~ / " /'/""', .. , . , '\,. + , .. / ... / .+ v' , "." ._ x " . ~......-\ -- / -- ,.- '. \ '. ..-/ /" ~ \ .--/ ~I OJ, Xl 01 '.J OJ w .'0 () ,0 1'1 fry . " ,>, '\ "" .. r -~ I Ii K\ f' ........ ..... OJ ", .t>~ 00 / / ~ ... Q) '" '" '" / Jf'i.i.,t~( .-""-0'1, If ....1'. ,.__ ~ ~' -' -.'-, - -- :~~.:.;..:=..:_~~ \ i~,S::'-r: , .- '-- ,- - -:-----.- I ~ I / l / / / ./ / / // .-". --- ..---. . .' /~ / --------- _/ -.- ---.. . .._..-.,-.,-~-.... .) j n.-\ r0 ,,, -._-~..-- , ~. "- --------- i,"" . \ " Q) . N m IN ~ -- -,- / ---- /-:- / "./,. .-:: ./'." ...... /" ......./.... ,~' _~ {H~IO . / ./ -"".- /;.---'" - ,.'- ---:~:- .. .~,-::::..;., -.'. .- ',,-:-.... .',. "- ,- '. " ~ -- I --/ -.-; ~ ;':'~",:'. ~ --- ---- ~ .....-. '-.-.-.. ~ ',,- --'& ~.~.. '1 .:.:...:::~" ......x ::.: v'T . >0 "- '" ~ ~ ~ ----:..- --- - . ~ , i I 'I _.__'~.._ .. \ 1 __.-J ~ r= --- II 'IU" .' J ,. ^ :1- ~ .' r:,~ .- . '" ... ro <.D .l::> Co '. I , I ( 'i , f- .- \ --I I .'n JJ )::> Z (I cn -l i> C- O \ /. _.~_.---'\ , ./ \ .,/ ---. ". ... ~ " . '--] 1- l \ ., . " '. , i , c~__. .0 -,.,--~. ,-~..-'. ~. - ., '''''-~ -... n " - .. ~ )-~--/ OJ ~ '\ . \ '-'"" . . ',/ ~ l,---. '>. \ / ~--" "', \.,"~ "-'-'~'7"" -.~ '" 'y ~. >~ -\ -~,~~, ~~~~ ./ '/-::::'--~/~-:::~. ~..;..... .,- ..~'..... / /" ',.,'- ----- ~,_._--...---.:::--.: ..' - '/.'/'/-- ~.. .,-~ ------ :::::'::::::~ ....,/// '" /../,....... --.'- ....-.----.::.:::::::::---... /''/ //:/:---: ..-~.. -=, . . --~ .--.... ..- .- ./ .-" ---. ~.- ---.:::. '..... ~:/":~ ~---~ ;o::::~~~. -<-=--.::.---:':S ...~::.:~~~~~-=-; -'>~:"-:;::- --'--'~ ;;::.::i-:::::;.:-....-".,~ --- ,~.--, _.-:::, ~" .- ~~: ..f~JJ:::;=f.~ \' (~l; f~~ "'/],..,'/.." . ! " ) ~ ~ N i / --/ C--'l I I i J L __. .....-. " \ \.. \ ----., / / /~),,'I .. I J I ,/'. ---''-'--'" r ; "-- , ------ . ---- / ----- ~,. ~ .' ,'''.-::=:.:.~ .......... ~.:...:.~,~'" / ,. -''"'I /~.., (' ....;;;;.;;, J' ~' .\ '.... .'-,. --.--, /-, . ') '------....-., -".., --~ -------. ~ --l eel, o .~ ,. I " ... OJ ':f! :t> ,.\ i , ... ro ':f! 1:0 " (f)