Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sr.Allen Farre View.A2295 ~ r-< CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 02/28/95 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2737-181-48-704 A22-95 STAFF MEMBER: KJ PROJECT NAME: ALLEN F.A.R. REVIEW Project Address: LOT 4. East Cooper Affordable Housinq Subdivsn. Legal Address: Aspen. Colorado 81611 APPLICANT: Douqlas Allen 925-880 Applicant Address: 225 N. Mill St/210 REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Mathis ~epresentative Address/Phone: 927-3415 Fax: 925-9398 Aspen. Colorado 81611 -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- FEES: PLANNING $ 489 # APPS RECEIVED 9 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 9 FLAT FEE $ ENV.HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 489 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- REFERRALS: city Attorney city Engineer Housing Dir. Aspen Water city Electric Envir.Hlth. Zoning Parks Dept. Bldg Inspector Fire Marshal Holy Cross Mtn. Bell ACSD Energy Center School District Rocky Mtn NatGas CDOT Clean Air Board Open Space Board Other Other bATE ~EFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: ;~;~~=;~;;~;~7=~~========;~;~=;~~;~;7=~h~!1E==~;~;~~7~ ___ City Atty ___ City Engineer ___Zoning ___Env. Health ___ Housing ___ Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: ."...." ~ DOUGLAS P. ALLEN 225 North Mill Street, Suite 210 Aspen, Colorado 81611 May 8, 1995 Neighborhood Character Design Committee City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Allen Residence--Lot 4, East Cooper Affordable Housing Subdivision Dear Committee Members: The above-referenced lot is in a newly created subdivision scheduled to have mix of 4,000-5,000 square foot single family residences and multi-family employee housing units. The subdivision is located between Highway 82 and Riverside Subdivision and between the Crestahaus Lodge and two story apartments. The character of the neighborhood is varied with no particular design style or material usage. The lot is small with the Riverside Irrigation Ditch running on two sides of the lot and the centerline of the Lacet Court as one of the property boundaries, The site slopes to the Northeast and has heavy vegetation along the Southwest side of the lot. Thank you. LTRI032 r-- r-- MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Kim Johnson From: cindy Christensen Postmark: Apr 14,95 9:52 AM status: Previously read Subject: Lot 4, Lacet, Doug Allen Message: Doug Allen has signed the deed restriction, it has been recorded and he has paid us his sales fee. I will be sending Doug a letter stating what he needs to do upon completion of this unit. I will mention that he has already received a deferred payment for another RO unit and which one does he plan on making his residence since it was our understanding that he was going to be living in the Lacet home. I will also mention that he cannot own other residential property within a 4 county region and it shows that he does. I will cc you the letter on this when I have it written before I mail. -------========x========------- .~ 1"""'\. MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Johnson, City Planner FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office DATE: March 15, 1995 RE: LOT 4, LACET COURT Doug Allen purchased Lot 4, Lacet Court, in June of 1994. At that closing, a Memorandum of Acceptance should have been signed and recorded which relates to the Occupancy and Resale Deed Restriction, Agreement and Covenant (Resident Occupied Unit), recorded in Book 731, Page 806, on November 18, 1993. Paragraph 3(c) states: Except with respect to the initial sale of the Property prior to construction of a residence thereon, Owner shall, upon closing, pay a fee to APCHA in an amount equal to one percent (1%) of the sales price, or such other amount as required by APCHA guidelines. Mr. Allen bought this lot from Robert Tobias who purchased this lot from the developer, Mr. Allen has signed the Memorandum of Acceptance and it is in the process of being recorded, There is still the fee of $2,140 that has not been paid to the Housing Office. I spoke with Mr. Allen this week and he is aware that this amount is still owed to the Housing Office, ~--- r-.. ,~ . DOUGLAS P. ALLEN 225 North Mill Street. Suite 210 Aspen. Colorado 81611 Douglas p, Allen Patricia K. Massender (303) 925-8800 FAX (303) 925-9398 February 28, 1995 Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Lot 4, Lacet Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: In connection with the Neighborhood Guidelines Review Application, I enclose my check in the amount of $489,00 together with a copy of my owner's policy of title insurance reflecting ownership in my name, This letter also authorizes Stan Mathis to process the application on my behalf. ially, DPA/pjh Enclosures LTR\101 n."..__.".___.__.._..______".__._..___.__________________.. I""" ~\ FEBRUARV 28, 1995 ASPEN NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER DESIGN COMMITTEE C/O ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE CITV OF ASPEN 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 ATTN: KIM JOHNSON RE: DOUG ALLEN: LOT 4 EAST COOPER AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITTEE MEMBERS; THE FOLLOWING IS A DESCRIPITION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER IN WHICH THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE IS TO BE LOCATED. THERE ARE A VARIETV OF USES IN THIS PART OF ASPEN. THEV RANGE FROM SMALL MOTELS (CRESTAHAUS); LARGE HOMES AT THE ASPEN CLUB SUB- DIVISION; THE ASPEN ATHLETIC CLUB; A THREE STOREY EMPLOVEE HOUSING COMPLEX; AND A SINGLE FAMILV SUBDIVISION THAT DEFIES ANV DESCRIPTION OF CONTINUITY. THE DIVERSE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD IMPLIES THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORING USES, STYLE, SCALE AND MATERIALS. STAN MATInS ARCIllTECTURE AND PLANNING Post Office Box 1984 Aspen Colorado 81612 303/920.1434 ~. r'\ FEBRUARY 26, 1995 ASPEN NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER DESIGN COMMITTEE C/O ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE CITV OF ASPEN 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 61611 ATTN: KIM JOHNSON RE: DOUG ALLEN DEAR COMMITTEE MEMBERS; THE APPLICANT, DOUG ALLEN, IS REQUESTING AN APPROVAL FOR A 2,639 S.F, AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENCE LOCATED ON LOT 4 OF THE EAST COOPER AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUBDIVISION (LACET), THE LOT SIZE IS 6,691 S.F, ALLOWING A FLOOR AREA OF 3,439 S.F., 65% OF WHICH EQUALS 2,923 S.F. WHICH WOULD EXCLUDE THE APPLICANT FROM THIS REVIEW. HOWEVER, THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD (BARB'S WAY) HAS A 20' WIDE R.O,W. ALONG THE N.E. PROPERTY LINE, THE AREA OF WHICH MUST BE DEDUCTED FROM THE ACTUAL AREA OF THE LOT FOR THE CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA. HAVING DEDUCTED THE AREA OF THE R,O.W. (1,660 SF) THE FLOOR AREA IS THEN REDUCED TO 2,912 S.F" 65% OF WHICH EQUALS 2.476 S.F., WHICH REQUIRES REVIEW BY THIS COMMITTEE SINCE THE PROPOSED AREA IS 353 S,F. GREATER THAN ALLOWED UNDER THE 65% RULE. THE SITE IS OUTSIDE OF THE BOUNDRY OF ANY OF THE FIVE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED VICINITY MAP. THE STAN COMMITTEE REVIEW STANDARDS WILL BE BASED ON THE GENERAL GUIDE- MATHIS LINES FOR ALL CORE AREA NEIGHBORHOODS. THEREFORE, THE DISCUSSION ARCfllTECTUlIiiAT FOLLOWS, RESPONDS TO CHAPTER 1 OF THE ASPEN NEIGHBORHOOD AND CHARACTER DESIGN GUIDELINES. PLANNING Post Office Box 1964 Aspen Colorado 81612 3031920-1434 MASS & SCALE 1) THE SCALE AND PROPORTION OF THE VARIOUS BUILDING COMPONENTS ARE SMALL IN SCALE TO THE OVERALL MASS OF THE BUILDING. ALL BUILDING COMPONENTS BEGIN AND END WITHIN ANV ONE FLOOR LEVEL. THE OVER HANGS AND RECESSED SPACES ARE NOT TO LARGE SO AS TO CREATE A MONUMENTAL SCALE. .~ ",'. '.- :,~" '. ':'::~-" , '..''<::,_~':'';;..::;''~,.,:,':~_: :;"";;::';;'"",~"_,, ;','-' '.~_. .,., '_' ;'~;:-.;.;'_~'';'''~'::;;;;''''-.'=--" ,,-"-c,; __' .- "-",~,,"..,,,,',,~- .,,-, ,,-, 2) THE PROPOSED SITE IS BORDERED ON THE N.E. BY A 3 STOREY EMPLOYEE HOUSING COMPLEX; ON THE SOUTH BY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES OF 4,000 SF, ON THE NORTH BY AN OPEN SPACE AREA BORDERED BY APARTMENTS AND ON THE WEST BY MEDIUM DENSE ASPENS AND A 1 1/2 STOREY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND BARN ON THE WEST. THE SITE IS HIDDEN FROM HIGHWAY 82 BY THE EMPLOYEE HOUSING PROJECT, IT IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO RELATE THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE TO ANY EXISTING RESIDENCE IN THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE RIVERSIDE ADDITION, THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS 3 STOREYS WITH THE ENTIRE FLOOR AREA LOCATED WITHIN ONE STRUCTURE. THE SIZE OF THE BUILD- ING ENVELOPE DOES NOT ALLOW SECONDARY STRUCTURES AS SUGGESTED OPENINGS IN THE EXTERIOR WALLS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE ARE 2 TO 3 TIMES TALLER THAN WIDE. THE NUMBER AND SIZE OF WINDOWS DO NOT OVER POWER THE EXTERIOR WALL SURFACE OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. 3) THIS GUIDELINE IS DIFFICULT AND PERHAPS INAPPROPIATE FOR THIS SITE WITH AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONFIGURATION OF THE LOT IE, IS NOT RECTANGULAR AND NOT A STANDARD ASPEN TOWNSHIP LOT (BASED ON 30', 45', OR 60' WIDE X 100' DEEP), 4) THE ELEVATIONS INDICATE NO GRAND ENTRY BUILDING FORM 5) la, b, c] ALL OF THESE GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED IN THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. STAN MATIHS SITE DESIGN ARCHITECf\JRE AND 6) THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE IS ORIENTED TO THE STREET. PLANNING Post Office Box 1984 Aspen Colorado 81612 303/920-1434 7) THE BUILDING ENTRY IS ON THE UPPER FLOOR. THERE IS A MIX OF RESIDENCES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAVE ENTRANCES EITHER AT GRADE OR 1 STOREY ABOVE GRADE, 8) THIS STRUCTURE DOES NOT AFFECT SOLAR ACCESS TO ADJACENT SITES. .-';,.:... ',C 'c, '. ',-~-_"i;;-".::"'_ ':'::;:>-.,'.:";,,!,_,,r.:.:;-,,:~~,,,.",":.":c:::' _c,: _~:,;,;;."'';;';;~,'i",';''::'.:;;;"~';':'''~--''";",,,,,,.,,:/:.-:,,,:_,,,'....;: ,;";",._":',,~;;-,-~';:':i~'"i;;C~;;.~~,-..,:,.,,:,=::il!,:.;;;:~:,,,>:;,;,',::c~J.w.;,~~;;; .-.., 1""'\ BUILDING MATERIALS 9) EVEN THOUGH THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS NOT CLAD IN NATURAL MATERIALS, IT DOES FIT THE CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD GIVEN THERE IS A MIX OF MATERIALS USED THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES 10) [a, b, c, d, & eJ ALL OF THESE GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED. 11) THERE ARE NO SOLAR COLLECTORS OR SKYLIGHTS, GARAGES 12) DUE TO THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE, THERE ARE NOT MANY OPTIONS, OTHER THAN WHAT IS SHOWN, FOR THE POSITION OF THE GARAGE. DRIVEWAYS 13) THE DR I YEW A Y SHOWN I S THE ONL Y WAY TO ACCESS THE LOT SERVICE AREAS STAN MATInS 14) SERVICE AREAS WILL BE SCREENED ARCHITECf(J!lE AND PLANNING IMPACT ON HISTORIC BUILDINGS Post Office 15 & 16) THESE GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED. Box 1984 .Aspen Colorado 81612 303/920.1434 r'o. -. '.'., . APPLICANT: ADDRESS: ,ZONE. DISTR.ICT: lOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): EXISTING FAR: ALLOWABLE FAR: PROPOSED FAR: EXISTING NET lEASABLE (commercial): PROPOSED NET lEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): IMUM HEIGHT: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEI DEMOl , PRO .EXISTlNG NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: EXISTING ON.SITE PARKING SPACES: ON-5ITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: SETBACKS: . EXISTING: .. Front: :'10 Rear: I C ~de: 10 Combined FronllRear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIESI ENCROACHMENTS: r-"\ . -- <. ... . '- .frrAN t1Am- ~ ~Dt" DDt:>4 Au..u.\ ..bQ1.A- j E-, c..oor~ A~t..f, l1oUi!Jl!l~ --.6H . . ~f>O (.P, &'l I iV~ -1;(.1-- z ~f{~~d~I(,f/'.~~~8.1~~ ~ ..' f,"I('Dl~ =48% ~~ Princioof Bldg,: Princioal BfdQ : M/~ . I kcessory BIda: ~-\c:> 1<iOG~Bldg:., ~$qo MIl? . i': . ~~s.-v ..~ -~ ALLOWABLE; , Fronl: ( Rear: I Side: \ Combined FrtI~r: , , \ PROPOSED: Front:'::ZO' f~l"\ Rear: . Side: Combined FronllRe VARIATIONS REOUESTED felioible for landmarl<s Onlv' charader compatibility findino must be made by HPCl: FAR: SETBACKS: Front: Rear: Side: Combined FrlJRr: Minimum Distance Between Btildi~s: Par1<ing Spaces: . Open Space (Commercial): Height (Cottage lnfill Only): Site Coverage (Coltagelnlill Only): ~(~ \~.'~ \ \\'" \ ...i) \J ~ I . )~'" . \ '"