HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.301 E Hyman Ave.56-80
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
Ci ty of Aspen
1. DATE SUBMITTED: ~ STAFF:
2. APPLICANT:~
~ V.
!
I
!
I
r
I
~.
A.
1"\
."\
,
. .
.f
..
No. 5'~1>
f
.
3. REPRESENTATIVE:'DM-'~I eiJsfitfc. Gt~~if'(ds
!
I
I
1
I
,
~
,
4. PROJECT NAME: ~~t.~AlfDillW
5. LOCATION: >>P'~7b/f ~e:;,(Lc??-1~c:1~ ~EZ')
~;(/~ ///U,4,u d:; /b../4~
,
6. TYPE 'OF APPLICATION:
Subdivision
Excepti on
Exemption
70:30
Residential Bonus
____Stream Margin
____8040 Greenline
_View Plane
_Conditional Use
_Other
Rezoning
---.j'.U.D.
-LSpecial Review
Growth Management
HPC
.bI/n./'~ ~~/d9 Lx.P"T'
7. REFERRALS:
~Attorney
)( Engineering Dept.
XHousing
_Water'
_City Electric
Sanitation District ____School District
Fire Marshal ____Rocky Mtn.Nat. Gas
Parks State Highway Dept.
Holy Cross Electric _Other
Mountain Bell
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS; ~4z./~L. ~U-/C.Z(3))
.~._..."'.
."""
f"'O\.
(
.
9. DISPOSITION: I .
P & z /' Approved/ Denied Date /~# /&:>
~.-I&';/ 7Z':' 1) C3?(65CLJ77C'P cr ~ ?J!3b7J"U::::71c"u
m/C'1'f '7'0 /SSvA/.,&E:. ~ ~,r'~T 2) (.IM/'
ax-//Z'//'//C) ~/77/~.L- 7r#/A-9 ft~, Co~
/fep-VA~
Council J Approved / Denied Date " h'1l~o
Go'^-V'\~ '"",6'l. r~"'2.- Av-\:~o~ '-'i,61 d4(-oL{ol ~J
,) ~ e~'1e<. ,:,.~,* .~ ~ ~ ~ "'-'+~& -h
\/""-ll.t,.{ "\0""" ~6\.u. 6\.-",,-- """" t......\.t.- \~U>""- T'J.e./.-ve-S
v) <l~ 0 '-lAA..fA\~ .<;)~ ~fl>J..... ~~,-\ '^^"'^""~ ~ Q..,'^^'f~1Q.U
o~ 64 QA.>>'>~' a.. \.,., ~
10. ROUTING:
j Attorney
J:"Uilding
~i""i"g
Other
__,_'...:.......~.."'-_.;..-._~,H_ ~~,'_,~~,~_,-'_~,..,'~"._. ~_', '"'~","__"'"..~-.,._.....__..__..._....._"'._~.~....,.__...._.~.-'
-_._~,~._,.....- ",-,_._,,'-'~"'"
r"
.~
340t
"".'
~.._."....
Re ular !-1eetin
Aspen City Council
November 8, 1982
l
u
Ms. penne pointed out that both projects require additional approvals. Employee housing
units constructed as part of a commercial GMP project require approval of Council upon
recommendation of p & Z. The Whale of a Wash has to have a special review for an FAR
bonus as well as HPC approval. The Rubey Park visitors center needs to be rezoned to SPA, ,,'
have an SPA plan adopted and get HPC approval. Ms .Penne told Council if they agreed ~l
with ilb.e P Sc Z recommendation, they should approve Resolution #32, Series of 19B2. !;
Bil Dunaway asked if the Rubey Park Visitors Center had to receive voter approval.
Manager Chapman said Rubey Park was paid for out of the general fund, not with six
seventh penny funds. The Charter requirement that there be voter approval because
space funds does not apply.
II
I'
i.
11
Councilwoman Michael moved to approve Resolution #32, Series of 1982; seconded by Council-
man Knecht.
City
.and :!
of open H
II
II
,
"
l;
!:
I'
;\
Ii
Monroe Summers told Council that the current zoning of Rubey Park, T, Transportation, allows
food service operations in support of a public facility. Summers said he feels that the '
public facility uses of the building, the transportation elements, hallways, restrooms,
food service operations, lockers, all are exempt from competition under growth management.
Mayor Edel said a restaurant is a commercial venture and should be cQunted. Vann said the
zone allows certain uses as assessory to the transportation function; the applicant will
have to come in in a subsequent review process and convince Council the nature of any
operation is in fact accessory. Whether or not Council concurs, is a separate issue.
Councilman Collins questioned the s,quare footage on Rubey Park. Ms. penne said
commercial square footage requested is 5810 square feet. There are other areas
considered accessory to the type of use. There are subsequent reviews for this
Councilman Collins asked what the rest of the area is as the total build out is
S8l0.square feet. Ms. Penne said there is employee housing, public space.
the total
that are
project.
more than
~
LI
U
Councilwoman Michael asked how this allocation for GMP commercial project-can come to
.Council with a proviso the rest of the project will be dealt with later. Vann told Council i:
the applicant competed for 5810 square feet of commercial space. The applicant believes
that certain uses are accessory to the public function of the building. Council, upon
P & Z recommendation, must make the determination about the rest of the project. Vann said:'
if Council does not agree about the rest of the project, the applicant will have to amend
his application. If the applicant has to compete,in the growth management competition for
the rest of the square footage, he will have to wait until the next competition. Vann said
in public facilities of a transportation nature, he felt it would be appropriate for a
commerciaL support to have something like coffee and doughnuts.
Vann said if Council does: decide to exempt the accessory uses, it will be s,object to
mitigating the impacts of that space. Council may exact, as a condition of exemption, if
there is employee' housing generated, that they meet that need. Summers said there is a
provision in the Code exempted food service operations in support of public facilities.
If Council does. not concur that the proposed food service square footage is an accessory
use, the project will have to go back through GMP or not be. Summers said the question is
how much, or what, will be exempted.
All in favor, Councilman Parry abstained. Motion carried.
ORDINANCE #63, SERIES OF 1982 - Land Use Code Referral Fees
Environmental Health Officer Tom Dunlop told Council the county has chosen not to address
this ordinance so Council should not address it.
ORDINANCE #64, SERIES OF 1982 - Food Service Establishment Fees
Tom Dunlop, environmental health department, told Council as a result of escalating costs,
he is trying to generate more revenues. Dunlop said the environmental health department
could charge for checking food service paIns for new and remodeled restaurants. Dunlop
said this would generate $2,000 a year. The department is not self-supporting but they
are trying to lessen the impact on the general fund. Councilman Collins said every time
the city prOVides a service to the citizens, they put the burden on, them. There is already
a fee paid to the building department for plan checks. Councilman Collins pointed out this
would only raise a few thousand and would prefer not to charge businesses again. Council
agreed with this. Council told Tom Dunlop his department was doing a good job.
MAIN STREET TRAFFIC LIGHTS
.
Jay Hammond, engineering department, reminded Council there has been concern over the
sequencing and the lengths of the traffic lights. Hammond met with the police chief and
Councilman Parry. The feeling was the sequences at Monarch and Aspen were too long a wait
Mill and Main' it is important to maintain a separation between the traffic and pedestrians
This means keeping the pedestrian sequence and the no righ~ turn on red. Hammond. said the
green sequence on the Mill street side will be lengthened. The stop signs on MOnarch and
Bleeker will be reversed to create a direct alternative between Mill and Aspen.
Hammond told Council the department of highways has had personnel in Aspen for awhile
attempting to repair some of the electrical problems with the system. Hammond said that
the syncronization of the three lights is not working. Hammond said he feels the city
should go to the department of highways and tell them the system is not working, and that
the lights should be repaired and functioning before winter, or replace the system.
Council agreed to have.a meeting with the highway department as soon as possible.
IJ
ENCROACHMENT REQUEST - prospector Lodge
Herb Paddock, representing the applicant, told Council they are requesting an encroachmen1
license on the Hyman Avenue side of 4 inches in a couple of areas. The two entry areas
into the Prospector project 4'4" into public property.
-~,----,--".,....".,.......,.,..........
~.........._"'""
"-'~""'-""""---'-'-""----~--.--'~''''',",:",",:"-..,...._.,,......,.~~-
.....,.._.,~.....--.-._~.~
.~ ~""----"""-'~'-'"~~
,__,---c.,_'~~~~'_
,
_._~'"
'?4D'2-
Regular Meeting
Aspen City Council
November 8, 1982
Councilman Parry moved to authorize and direct the Mayor to execute the standard city
encroachment agreement for the encroachments on the right-of-way pursuant to Section 19-5
of the Municipal Code according to the map submitted for two 4-inch encroachments and
52 square foot and 28 square foot encroachments for Code requir~d stairwells; seconded by
Councilman Collins. Allin favor, with the exception of Councilman Knecht.
SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION - Little Victorians
D
Co1ettePenne, planning office, told Council this is a request for subdivision exception
to condominiumize eight units know as the Little Victorians located at 634 West Main. Ms.!,
Penne said these units have all rented outside the income guidelines for the past eighteenl
months.
Councilman Parry moved to approve subdivision exception for the purpose of condominiumiza-"
tion of the Little Victorians apartments at 634. West Main with the following conditions; ~
(1) improvements necessary to the building from the results of the building department it
inspections as summarized in the Octoberl8, 1982, and October 19, 1982, building depart- 11
ment memos must be made prior to the sale of any unit: (2) compliance with Section 20-22; ~
(3) statement of exception from the full subdivision process for the purpose of condo- I'
minimization and a declaration of restriction covenants be executed on forms approved by .
the city attorney; seconded by Councilman Collins. All in favor, motion carried.
APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS & CO~ISSIONS
Councilman Knecht moved to appoint David White as alternate to P& Z; seconded by Council-
man Parry. Allin favor, motion carried.
Councilman Knecht moved to appoint Richard Head as alternate to the Board of Adjustment;
seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE *51, SERIES OF 1982 - Fire Station Rezoning
Mayor Edel opened the public hearing. There were no co~ents. Mayor Edel closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Parry moved
by COuncilman Knecht.
ayeiMayor Bdel, aye.
to adopt Ordinance' '#51, Series
Roll call vote; Councilmembers
Motion carried.
of 1982, on second reading: seconded,
Collins, aye; Parry, aye; Knecht, I
ORD~NANCE *55, SERES IF OF 1982 - Historic Code Amendments
Mayor Edel opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Edel closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Parry moved to adopt Ordinance #55, Series of 1982; seconded by Councilman
Collins. Roll' call vote; Councilmembers Knecht, aye; Collins, aye: Parry, aye; Mayor
Edel, aye. Motion carried.
ORDINANCE *56, SERIES OF 1982 - Appropriations
o
Mayor Edel opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Edel closed the
public hearing.
Councilman parry moved
by Councilman Collins.
aye; Mayor Edel, aye.
to adopt Ordinance #56, Series of 1982, on second reading; secondedl
Roll call vote: Councilmembers Parry, aye; Knecht, aye; Collins, t
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE *57, SERIES OF 1982 - Appropriations
Mayor Edel opened the pUblic hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Edel closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Parry moved
by, Councilman Knecht.
aye: Mayor Edel, aye.
to adopt Ordinance #57, Series
Roll call vote~ Councilmembers
Motion carried.
of 1982, on second reading; seconded
Knecht, aye; Collins, aye; Parry, I
ORDINANCE *60, SERIES OF 1982. - Banning Leg Hold Traps
Mayor Edel opened the public hearing. Randy Cote, COlorado Division of Wildlife, said
that if leghold traps are used properly the way they were intended, most injuries can be !
done away with. Cote said education of using traps would be more appropriate than banning!:
them. Cote said once animals are trapped, it makes it much more difficult to trap them il
again. Lisa Russell, animal control department, said dogs have been caught in these [!
traps a~d one dog had to have his leg amputated. Assistant City Attorney Gary Esary i
suggested amending the ordinance to allow the city manager to issue a permi~ to trap in I
time of danger, animal disease, etc. Council agreement Mayor Edel closed the public
hearing. .
Councilman Parry moved to adopt Ordinance #60, Series of 1982, on second reading as amender;
seconded by Councilman Collins. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Knecht, aye; Parry, aye:
Collins, aye; Mayor Edel, aye. Motion carried.
CONSENT AGENDA
I
t
,
! Councilman Parry moved to approve the consent agenda: seconded by Councilman Collins. All,
i,.! . in favor, motion carried. The consent agenda is (1) Liquor License renewals - Ute City il
. Banque~ Clark1s Market: Of Grape & Grain; Chart House; Maurice's; Golden Horn~ Mother :
I',. Lodge; Elk's and Country\ Road~ (2) Special Event Permits; Friends of the Winter concerts ii
and Windstar. H
: ~
;1
1\
\!
Councilman Collins moved to adjourn at 9:40 p.m.: seconded by Councilman Parry.
favor, motion carried.
All
in
Kathr~-n S. Koch
Ci ty Clerk
----_..._.......-.--..._~.----"","'-",.~_._., ~..,-...........,,'-,,_.""-~-_..._._~~----.~'-,-....-....,~_..-....--,., "_._'-_..,._..-._._--_.,------~"._~-_.----
.~
~
PEN
130
asp
DATE: November 3, 1982
TO: Members of City Council
FROM: Gary ESary~
RE: Request for Encroachment Request on Hyman Avenue/Prospector
Lodge
Approved for submission to City Council:
Attached hereto is a copy of a letter request
license onto the East Hyman Avenue right-of-
Prospector Ldoge.
The letter asks for a 4-inch encroachment for rock veneer on the
front of the building. However, since the letter was written, the
applicant has amended his request to include an additional 52-
square foot encroachment and a 28-square foot encroachment for
required stairwells.
Herb Paddock will be present to represent the applicant. A photo-
copy map of the requested encroachments and a draft encroachment
agreement are also attached. A marked improvements map will be
available at the meeting.
I spoke to Jay Hammond about this application and he grudgingly
approves it. According to Jay, it was poor design to build to the
property line without providing for required access, but given the
present location of the building, the encroaching stairwells
appear to be the only solution. Further, according to Jay, the
encroachments at least still provide for the minimum eight-foot
sidewalk width.
Finally, although the City has apparently granted minor encroach-
ments in the past without cost and as a matter of course (the
Woodstone and the Patio Building come to mind), the size of this
encroachment may lead the City to consider a payment for this
encroachment, either as a periodic rental or a one-time fee.
GSE/mc
Attachments.
,-.,
~_--..
MEMORANDUl1
DATE: November 3, 1982
TO: Members of City Council
FROM: Gary Esary
RE: Request for Encroachment Request on Hyman Avenue/Prospector
Lodge
Approved for submission to City Council:
I
I
Attached hereto is a copy of a letter requesting an encrochroent
license onto the East Hyman Avenue right-of-way on behalf of the
Prospector Ldoge.
The letter asks for a 4-inch encroachment for rock veneer on the
front of the building. However, since the letter was written, the
applicant has amended his request to include an additional 52-
square foot encroachment and a 28-square foot encroachment for
required stairwells.
Herb Paddock will be present to represent the applicant. A photo-
copy map of the requested encroachments and a draft encroachment
agreement are also attached. A marked improvements map will be
available at the meeting.
I spoke to Jay Hammond about this application and he grudgingly
approves it. According to Jay, it was poor design to build to the
property line without providing for required access, but given the
present location of the building, the encroaching stairwells
appear to be the only solution. Further, according to Jay, the
encroachments at least still provide for the minimum eight-foot
sidewalk width.
Finally, although the City has apparently granted minor encroach-
ments in the past without cost and as a matter of course (the
Woodstone and the Patio Building come to mind), the size of this
encroachment may lead the City to consider a payment for this
encroachment, either as a periodic rental or a one-time fe~.
GSE/mc
Attachments
"
~
-.,
-.,
RI\
ASPEN
ffl~
Mr. Gary Esseray
Assistant City Attorney
]30 South Galena St.
Aspen, Colorado
REFRENCE: Encroachment License for Prospector Lodge
Dear Gary,
As we discussed yesterday, there is a 4 inch encroachment into
public-right-of-way on the Hymen Street frontage of the Prospector
Lodge. The attached survey verifies this situation.
Per section 19-5 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, I am
requesting an encroachment license from the City of Aspen on
behalf of the owner. A prompt scheduling for City Council
review would be greatly appreciated.
Additionally, I am working to obtain the necessary approvals
from the Historic Preservation Committee due to unauthorized
changes by the previous general contractors. Those changes are
scheduled to be heard by the H.P.C. on October 12th.
Finally, I am preparing a request for an ammendment to the
Conditional Use approval to the Planning and Zoning Connnission.
Due to the addition of the Mechanical ~oom in the Parking Garage,
there has been a reduction in the number of parking spaces from
17 to 16. I hope to have this scheduled for the November 16th
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for their review.
Thank you again for your assistance in addressing the encroachment
problem. Hopefully we can finally resolve all the problems
connected with the Prospector Lodge and realize the use of an
attractive facility that the owner and the City of Aspen can
be proud to have available to the tourist industry.
:;~~
HeJ'E) ',,~c
xc
Engineering Department
Building Department
Planning Department
ASP ENE N GIN E E R I N GAS S 0 C I ATE S, INC.
P,O,BOX 4974, ASPEN COLORAOO B0611
(303) 925 - 4112
) ,.--::::::;
,
~"t~'~~;'...:i;'^ . "",' J>'^ -
..._ __. . 'c-' ....;.~'_.,., "'"',"",,<:':'
. """',
2999 '.' r
.~
and one single family residence. The entire Lakeview addition is zoned R-15/PUD: other !i t;! 'n:1~
zones in the ar.eaare NC and S/C/lr San District is zoned public1 Hallam lake and the ij 'T~:tf f::\
Roaring Fork river area are zoned AF.-L and Park. Originally, the applicants said they ',I f;,;;~,
wanted to build aIO,OOO square foot building, which would be permitted in the NC floor ,j j I,:"""
area ratio. The proposal is for 4 employee units on the first floor: offices on the !I JI.!: ~i:I:.
second floor, and two free market units on the top floor.. Since then, it bas become _:i ::':.: i -t:' 1:._
APPA.rent none of the uses reques't:;ed, are conditional uses in the NCzone. and the apPlicanti!l'..I"i.'. j '. i. ;.............
will consider uses that are appropriate_ I ~,d<i! .',:
. " r'"
vann told Council the applicants contend that the city'S approval of Trueman Center, post!, ': ':),""""";~':
office, Mill street venture, etc. have impacted and changed the character of the R-lS n:~ . :;! fj;,;"
Lakeview addition and has made their property unsuitable for residential development. . 1: l ~2
vann pointed out this property was acquired after the approvals of the Trueman Center and !I ~,i::
the post offic:_ Vann to~d Council,the planning,office feels,thatinsUfficien~ NC zones ~~
exist in the c~ty to prov.3.de. forne~ghborhood-or.3.ented establ.3.shments. There.3.s ample , ~ 1 ~:t
0, Office zoning throughout Aspen_ Commercial and office zoning outside of the CC and C-l:1 .~ t ~;::':
will further increase the potential of conunercial development outside the growth management; J~'
plan controls. This is a condition which the planning office, P & Z and city Council ,~! ,~~
is a major contributor to the employee housing demand. Vann said the planning office j j %'."
feels that the area north of the Trueman Center has remained unchanged" The Trueman Center ~:" t~7~:
and post office represent complete the commercial development in that area and forms a i :;' t-;,.;,~~
"boundary between NC and s/c/I uses and the residential liallam lake ,area. Vann contended ~ t. ~".',.-:.
that to permit further commercial development of this property would permit further J L . t.:,..
~~~~~~chment in a highly sensitive area. This would also further congest traffic down \I:!' . ff:~
The planning office recommendation was that P & Z and Council deny this request for rezoning ~: ~~
~~g~C i~~~~;~fy t~~~:~~l~l S~;~~ :~~e~~e c~~~e~~~~n~~Ge~n~~r~n;~~~~~iy b~~~~~~~. b~~:~e~pace . '; i i :,'~,.~".,........~'...
areas to the northwest. The Lakeview addition R-l5 zoning acts as a buffer zone between :.1'! ','
the two areas. Vann said in view of the ,extensive NC development currently existing in ,~,I:.':.:'; ~f;~~
the area, the ample availability of,O, Offize zoning in other parts of the city, and the ., wc~
highly congested nature of Puppy Smith street, it is the opinion of the planning office :i,:. ~t:
~~~~::::';;-;:::;:~~~::::~~;;;::~:;:~~~:~~::::;::.. ~~ill III
::d:::n:::::n C::::::. that this particular area has undergone some substantial changes and~ Ilm\!~.
the basic question is whereto draw the line. This particular property is the one that ;! ':~,,:~: "'i".".
~i:~~ii~~n~h~s m~~;k~~g w~~; ~a~s~o~~r o~h:n:r;~e~~; ~~;~a~;e b;i~g r~~*~:~t~~;mab~l~~:tions. .:,1;:] ~.
Changes that have gone on in the area. This property is far enough away from Hallam Lake i! if,~, ~~;"
that it will not affect it. Kaufman said the applicants are willing to work with the Ii 'r'i: ~~'
;;;;~,;;::;:;~.~, ~::~~;;;,~;;: ~;;, :~~;:;:;~;:;:;o ~;~~::, I ~.. ,I....
in that location for the reasons in the memorandum. Councilwoman Michael said S/C/I ':: ~ iJ~"","'rEi;
would probably be more appropriate. The applicant f s arguement of changed conditions is "~'"' .~
very valid. Councilman Behrendt said he feels the benefit to the community of the ~il:' ,~. i ~:~-~;.
environment area and open space area will be lost if this is approved. There will be f,';~~:.:," ;':, ~ !E
development going allover. Councilwoman Michael said she would be willing to look at
S/C/l as it is needed and is more appropriate.
l"',~t~""'.("~~~1~~:~~i"~:~~~~~;2~_":'~\~~t:i~i~:~: ';~'1' ;"~J;;;.'ijlc:'(;~;"i"
Ilegular Meeting
Aspen City Council
November 24. 1980
EMPLOYEE UNIT IN PROPSPECTOR LODGE
All in favor, with the exception of Councilman parry. Motion carried.
Sunny Vann told Council this is a request for growth management exemption for an employee .:
hOUSing unit to be constructed in the remodeled and expanded Prospector Lodge. This lodge:!
is a conditional use in the CC zone district. The proposal has gone through P & Z and :!
ape. The applicant is seeking approval for a proposed employee unit to replace an older
unit; the proposed unit is 630 square feet. Dave Gibson told Council the old building
will be torn down and redone. The new unit will have kitchen, bathroom, bedroom, etc.
COuncil brought up who would occupy the unit; Gibson answered it is intended for an
employee of the lodge. Councilman, Behrendt noted this is proposed to be 'a moderate unit.
Jim Reents, housing director, said one factor is that this is new construction. Another
POssible factor is that when an employer is building units for his own employee, perhaps
the city ought not get involved in that guideline. The' employer will have to pay the
employee. Council had a long discussion about who could live in the unit. Ms. Butterbaugh
pointed out if this unit is restricted to an employee of the lodge, the question of what
price guidelines should be used is moot because the unit is probably part of his salary.
Councilwoman Michael moved to exempt. the proposed Prospector 'Lodge employee housing unit
from compliance with growth management procedures subject to the following conditions;
(1) the deed restriction of the one-bedroom employee unit for a period of 50 years under
the city's low income rental guidelines, said restriction to be executed prior to the. "
issuance of a building permit; (2) the construction of the employee housing unit otherwisei;
COmplying with all requirements imposed by the zoning code, a final determination of com- "
pliance to be made at such time that working drawings are submitted for a building permit ,
and (3) occupants of said unit be employees of the prospector Lodge; seconded by Councilman
Behrendt. All in favor, with the exception of Councilman Collins. Motion carried. :(
i
,
"
;!
"~
,-,
EXHIBIT ,"An
_~~ty~t:"'~~~~~;'~$~~&'".:z2~~!t",,"~,,~?,rf.~'7\:~~j!L~~,t~:;. '''~\~I'~'J~:~\1~''~~'L'i;\~>~:~.~.",::,~;'~trk'J,r/~:,~.:~~~ll:i";;;'~i;..
~~. f'"-It..;:,~ ~---r r\;';..r;,~\'!'~"~:'\""""I"~r ....1.";".;0 'r-
__c,..;_4 ..,-- J h~;,.,,:I~,...w.l.~~..,~~,.,; ~ .,."')J;, ::,.t~'\"~_,~ t"'""ov'e
'...,-:;.~ :.;~.,..-o~. ", ". f"'lr..,.~ ~;i;.~' ,."" ..tl!_.o:.....
~~~Il...'- ., '. . "'.....l!'-tl-'" :..~ ......t::w...
,......,I...~ "'~.' ".I-IAJ.-.... ..... ,~--
-~-:~~~~~~.! :--- .__.~~.:=~ .--+::::--.. -- ."-A _."...'....._..~_.___"_n'___
", .,' ,", 'l',' 'J\"/~~"><:'. ',;,~-~ :-:.-..',--,.,'
''':.\, ,/~, 'I :~/:; .'\',".' ",I.'
, " L';J'I J. ~.''<<i''-'::'J-':'_::''':'''--':'' ..~.~'I'"'---'-'-
" ,I\~ ",.j.- rT " ,,{" """ i '!'_
I'! ',,", .'" \4. I ':'\ 0"" I ' ~
.. .' '~__':Jl_~\4.=-=I=i1~~~'-:,~..-l.P' _ ' -__ ___
}
~
j
,
t
,
,
1
I
.-.;.-1-.....-
.' .
..
\\
"
,
-
f,'
l.-~- -~-
----,
" ',:.,..:. '
!i .
j', '
;&. I, " '
f,' I
t I"
IN~
i.; X
~'
'i-i:
~~
, ~
:~
4'~-;' : !,
. ~
';..;:,:'
<<Y' ,
, ~r
"'J ~
.'~"
"
". .....
........
"
'.
~.....
. "
.........
".
"
",., .. ..
,
,
"
,
..........~
*.....
..... ~ . .
"
. ._i .
~
7
"r:-'-U
I
r
~i
h
Q0
li
.. r
, \I ~
, 1
.' ~
,~...;.<,i~S,..
, ,
:,'
.'
\:: ".
"
"
I
,J "
I
:}I:
"'.
I
t
, "
.':\ ,~W',
" n""
.' - .
. ....... .-
*'.. .
.. f'
111-'
(' , '. ,I
'). l::::=_.
-.-..---....1
" '
>'."' /'
L
r-',
I 'lj
'p..!
[_..1
. ~--
r .
I
I
ill} t~
! tM
Y tv
~ ~~}~
\) }~
~! ~ (J~
~i I
:it Ii'
jl
~L
,..,~: :.':"~:
"".
..
i:7:::" i : '
~\ '
."'.i~"'<'.. .'Ii
" ,
! ".
" .
. ",..'
i" ......1
. . , . 1 ....
I . '. .'.! \...
~" 4_" "
<" . 7'fi1.' ..
" '" . i ",
-"Z " .
o ... I
11'
~; ~~~ ': , ~
~
-, ""-_._-.
~:
~I
~.
<.
1'"7
~.,
~
.
"
,
" ..,'
"
~
. '.
t
\, ,
r;,=r . ..
:In'..~--'
.'
-",
"
~'_I
.,
L
r-
. ,II I
,:~,
I . '
.1
"
t- -.
:.,
il
F
l'
, '
::":':-::.'
I
, 1
,I
"I t----.
,I ' _..."
i . I . jr--'--- -.
L-:-n-- " :
"- .
[.: I' !
. I.
I
, '1
I
I
., .
"--:_~
e:.>"I':lo"T'":'G : .
....~~ "1
I" 10~1
'<. . I
"., ':~,. i
i" ~ l'
--= ,,\,
"
"
I~Jl,
~.- -- -_....-
I I !' I .....__~~~ :
.o,..".::.a.......__......... F'~""-'.I
1'"..........-'1'"""_.'1 ....:.,~:,.;,...,- '~'!,'
\'",-::;:';;;;f'. .~~!
-..=---:....... ",", ~~
'- ,'j .."l( , '"
... !
..".~
'. .n.........
'1l-:,~!, .
,~~~
Ir',\ ::
-: n \-
t ~.~.:
" ~l
, .
"
--.---
".
-
~-~
-.. ,:.~.~',',~~~~"7>:~'T<".. ,~:'" .",.,.,;~,'~.:"
,~.~..:,,,',,:.:; ::.::..:."~'i:',..'.;..':,;-i
~;:-;. ~"'" ,
,-,
.
,......,
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Prospector Lodge, Employee Unit Special Review
DATE: November 18, 1980
APPROVED AS TO FORM FOR CITY COUNCIL:
Background
Pursuant to Section 24-10.2H, the app1ican is requesting special review
approval to construct an employee housing unit in the Pro:;pector Lodge.
Such units are exempt from Growth Management subject tothe'(approva1 of the
City Council upon the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
On August 19th, 1980 the applicant received approval from the Planning &
Zoning Commission to renovate and expand the lodge, a conditional use in
the CC zone district, and for exemption from Mandatory P.U.D.
As the attached 1 etter indi cates, the app 1 i cant proposes to construc~ an approxi-
mate1y 630 sq.ftnne-bedroom employee housing unit to replace an existing
efficiency unlt of approximat1ey 250 sq. feet. The new one-bedroom unit is
intended to house the lodge's resident manager and will contain its own
kitchen, fireplace, balcony and semi-private entry. The applicant proposes
to deed restrict the unit for a period of 50 years under the City's moderate
income guidelines.
The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant's request and recommends
approval without conditions. The Housing Director has also reviewed the
application and concurs with the moderate income rental restriction.
Recommendation
In view of the City's desire to encourage incorporation of employee housing
in conmercia1 operations, and the fact that the provision of an employee unit
was a condition of the applicant's prior P&Z approval, the Planning Office
recommends approval of the applicant's request subject to the following
stipulations:
1. The deed restriction of the one-bedroom employee unit for a period
of 50 years under the city's moderate income rental guidelines,
said restriction to be executed prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
2. The construction of the employee unit otherwise complying with all
requirements imposed by the zoning code, a final determination of
compliance 'to' be made at such time that working drawings are
submitted for a building permit.
The Planning & Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office recommen-
dation and approved the applicant's request subject to the above conditions
on November 4th, 1980.
Should Council also concur with the above recommendations, the appropriate
motion is as follows: "I move to exempt the proposed Prospector Lodge employee
housing unit from compliance with Growth Management procedures subject to the
following conditions~
1. The deed restriction of the one-bedroom employee unit for a period
of 50 years under the city's moderate income rental guidelines.
said restriction to be executed prior to the issuance of a building
permi t.
\',
,
ii
2. The construction of the employee housing unit otherwi,se complying
with all requirements imposed by the zoning code, a final determi-
nation of compliance to be made at such time that working drawings
are submi tted for a bui) ding te/rmi t. !
., .;;;~'t<"( l~/' (Z;-L /:;/
i'
v
r--.
.-,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Prospector Lodge Employee Unit Special Review
DATE: October 30, 1980
Back9round
Pursuant to Section 24-10.2(hl, the applicant is requesting special review
approval to construct an employee housing unit in the Prospector Lodge. Such
units are exempt from Growth Management subject to the approval of the City
Council upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. On
August 19, 1980, the applicant received approval from the Planning and
Zoning Commission to renovate and expand the lodge, a conditional use in the
CC zone district, and for exemption from mandatory PUD. As the attached
letter indicates, the applicant proposes to construct an approximately
630 square foot, one bedroom employee housing unit to replace an existing
efficiency unit of approximately 250 square feet. The new one bedroom unit
is intended to house the lodge's resident manager and will contain its own
kitchen, fireplace, balcony and semi-private entry. The applicant proposes
to deed restrict the unit for a period of fifty years under the City's moder-
ate income guidelines.
The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant's request and recommends
approval without conditions. The Housing Director has also reviewed the
application and concurs with the moderate income rental restrictions.
Recommendation
In view of the City's desire to encourage the incorporation of employee
housing in commercial operations, and the fact that the provision of an em-
ployee unit was a condition of the applicant's prior P & Z approval, the
Planning Office recommends approval of the applicant's request subject to the
following:
1. The deed restriction of the one bedroom employee unit for a period
of fifty years under the City's moderate income rental gui de 1 i nes,
said restriction to be executed prior to the issuance of a building
permit .
2. The construction of the employee unit otherwise complying with all
requirements imposed by the Zoning Code, a final determinati,on of
compl iance to be made at such time as working drawings are submitted
for a building permit.
'\qJ;
LV
~,' "
"
!"""\
~,
DATE:
Sunny v~ II
Jim Ree~ p
October 30, 1980
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Prospector Lodge
I would endorse the inclusion of this unit within the rebuild
of the Prospector Lodge.
It is my understanding that this will be a manager's apartment
and as such should not be deed restricted for any more than the
moderate income guidelines.
JR:ds
",....,
-.,
CITY
130 so
aspen,
treet
1611
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Sunny Vann, Planning Office
Department ~
FROM:
Fritz Bruggemeier, Engineering
DATE:
October 29, 1980
RE:
Prospector Lodge Employee Unit Special Review
The Engineering Department recommends the approval of the
Prospector Lodge Employee Unit Special Review.
,~
-,
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Housing Director
City Engineer
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Prospector Lodge Employee Unit Special Review
DATE: October 8, 1980
The attached application requests special review approval for the Prospector
Lodge employee unit. It is scheduled to come before the Aspen Planning and
Zoning Commission on November 4, 1980; therefore, please get any comments
conerning this application to me no later than October 23, 1980. Thanks.
~
"""""""' .".
-
-
,...
""'
PielSlick Gibson & Associares
Architects
520 E. Cooper
Alpen.co 111611
AveNR. Xftle 205
1.-1.303/925.1666
Octobe.r6,19BO
TO: PLANNING AND ZONI~G COMMISSION
RE: PROSPECTOR LODGE EMPLOYEE UNIT
Gentlemen:
We are proposing to provide a 630 aquate foot one-bedronm employee
-unit to replace an existing efficiency IInit of about 250 square f....t.
The new unit haa ita own kitchen, fireplace, balcony, view, and
semi-private air lock entry. It has convenient access to the desk!
lounge area where the employee will wark. All these amenities ate
lacking in present unit. and the 150% increaae is size is &Otely needed.
We propose to deed reatrict this unit to the "moderate" prtce
rental range and r"queer your approval to aD do.
.
.
DYG/hob
i
.
.
~~~','.4 ,I.'..:'
"f-- - _ __ _'-:L._ .-:-.,'..
I
,
I
J
.1~"3'W..~,&~~::;:);'!'$J00I~~~~~~$r';'"1tj.:;..-
r,.
,-
(:
.-
r ~'q~~.-
Ii'"
, "
+++."",
II i i
I
.
I
~
i '
l i
~ ; , '
; -t:'---t-
I
I
~
~
~
:!
i
i
~
.
~
~
~
~
,
.}
.!
~
~
.,
.:;.:
~~
~
..
~
.,
.
...
,
"
~.
, i
"i
i
~.
,
1
i
IT [
D~
-- 7!;;)J .
;:>
. i
til
.__F
,
,
fA,
L ~
-_::-~-
....-.y
I
>-
'~h::. UHf'C
g",.
__JS'__
!
fA
':;
_.._-~.-..;...,.~'.-:.~-;j~
"'.......">-..a.>_...,,...~~;....~-a;..~;;,:;,.....~t'~~-.r~'$';;::;:::t-Wi:"'~,."".~...~JlT....."::!',~lIIillj. _._