HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Caser.210 Lake Ave.A2-93
/
/
\
\
"',
.~
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 01t19~93
DATE COMPLETE: y; ~/ .3
PROJECT NAME: Schermer Hallam Lake
Project Address: 210 Lake Ave.
Legal Address: Lot 19. Block 103.
PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
2735-124-88-004 A2-93
STAFF MEMBER: KJ
Review
Hallam's Addition
APPLICANT: Betty & LloYd Schermer
Applicant Address: 3990 Cuervo. Santa Barbara. CA
REPRESENTATIVE: Douq Graybeal. Cottle. GraYbeal &
Representative Address/Phone: 510 E. Hvman. suite
Aspen. CO 81611
93108
Yaw
21
925-2867
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
FEES: PLANNING
ENGINEER
HOUSING
ENV. HEALTH
TOTAL
$ 942.00
$ 93.00
$
$
$1035.00
# APPS RECEIVED
# PLATS RECEIVED
9
TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF
P&Z Meeting Date 3;)&
APPROVAL: 1 STEP: -2L 2 STEP:
PUBLIC HEARING: YES ~
VESTED RIGHTS:' YES NO
PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
CC Meeting Date
" \
DR<;:;Meeting Date
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
REFERRALS:
City Attorney Parks Dept. School District
~ city Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas
X Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT
Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board
city Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Bpard .
Envir.Hlth. ACSD =x= Other ftC{5/-fl7m ("",)(w'""
>< zoning Energy Center ~ Other '!-/'p()'i.:c-r.y.,q "
DATE REFERRED: 1.! I INITIALS: 5-'/;1)' DDE: 3 II .
;~~~~=;~~;;~~7===~============;~;~=;~~;~;7~1r~==;~;;;~~7=~
___ City Atty ___ City Engineer ___Zoning ___Env. Health
___ Housing ___ Open Space Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
.,
COTTLE
GRAYBEAL
YAW
ARCHITECTS
1TD
JOHN COTTLE, AlA
DOUG GRAYBEAL, AlA
LARRY YAW, AlA
MARK HENTHORN, AlA
510 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 21
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
PHONE 303/925-2867
FAX 303/925-3736
r"""-.
1""'\
May 18, 1993
Ms. Kim Johnson, Planner
City of Aspen Planning Office
Aspen City Hall
130 South Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Schermer Residence
210 Lake Ave. Aspen, CO
Dear Kim:
On March 16, 1993 the City of Aspen P&Z approved the above project Hallam
Bluff ESA Review with several conditions. Condition No.8 stated: " A landscape
plan and rear view landscape sketches shall be submitted and approved by ACES
and Planning staff prior to issuance of any building permit. Only native vegetation
may be installed in the rear yard."
I have talked with Tom Cardamone regarding this condition. His recollection of
what the condition should be and mine are different then the above written
condition. We both recall discussing reviewing the rear landscape requirement
after the north wall of the project is framed. This will allow the project to be
viewed from the Hallam lake area to determine if it meets the landscape
requirements. Part of the problem in reviewing the hmdscape scheme during the
review process was understanding were the 50% landscape requirement was to
viewed from. The two large spruce trees on the rear of the property provide more
than the required screening from the ACES building, but provide a smaller
percentage of coverage as you move to the west away from the buildings. We feel
this is the best solution to the getting an accurate visual reading of the landscape
screening.
I am sending a copy of this letter to Tom Cardamone. Please call him or myself
with any questions. If you have a problem with this resolution to Condition #8,
please call me as soon as possible. We are close to pulling a building permit for
this project and hope to encounter no more delays.
Sincerely,
JJ.
Doug Gra
Principal
Copy: Tom Cardamone
r<-
r-..
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Planning and zoning commission
Kim Johnson, Planning Office
Schermer Hallam Lake Bluff ESA Review
TO:
RE:
DATE:
March 16, 1993
-~---------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
summary: The Planning Office recommends approyalof this request
with conditions. The applicant seeks to add onto an existing 2,200
single family residence and create a duplex totaling 4,150 s.f.
FAA. .
Applicant: Lloyd and Betty Schermer, represented by Doug Graybeal
Location: 210 Lake AYe. (Lot 19, Block 103, Hallam's Addition)
Zoning: R-6,' with Hallam Lake Bluff Environmentally sensitive Area
(ESA) overlay. The parcel is 10,760 s.L Please see Exhibit "A"
for vicinity map and Exhibit "B" for proposed site plan and site
section.
Referral Comments: See Exhibit "c" for complete memos.
Parks Department: Rebecca Baker stated that any trees slated for
relocation (broken or healthy) must receive tree removal/relocation
permits from the Parks Department prior to issuance of a building
permit. Prior to issuance of any building permits, tree protection
barricades must be erected at the drip lines of the two large
spruces in the rear year. The barricades shall be constructed to
prevent soil compaction, material storage, and spillage of
deleterious substances under the trees.
Housina Office: The addition of another dwel~ing unit requires
compliance with Ordinance 1 requirements. The cash-in-lieu payment
in effect at the time must be paid prior to issuance of any
building permits. The current rate is $8.33.00 per square foot of
new construction (1,978 s.f.).
A.C.E.S. - In a phone conversation with staff, Tom Cardamone
expressed that a more complete landscape plan is necessary to
determine the vegetation screening between the residence and the
nature sanctuary. Tom also expressed concern about the "emergency
lighting" which is mentioned as an exception to the lighting
criteria. Low level, low voltage lighting is acceptable, but wall
mounted floodlights are not acceptable.
Enqineerina: Chuck Roth submits the following comments:
1) Provision of four new spaces with variance to one space (HPC)
is acceptable. If the driveway is shared with the neighbor per the
original site plan in the application, a signed access agreement
~
.~
,
must accompany the building permit application. If the driveway
is fully contained on the Schermer property, final design details
must be included on the Building Permit site plan for approval by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of the Building Permit. The
curb cut cannot exceed 10' in width.
2) A drainage plan for improvements from 1981 forward must be
prepared by a registered engineer prior to issuance of a building
permit. Construction certification by the engineer must be
proyided prior to issuance of C.O.
3) The site plan for building permit shall indicate. a usable, five
foot wide pedestrian space.
4) The fence which encroaches into the right-of-way must either be
removed or receive an encroachment license from the Engineering
Department prior to the issuance of any building permits.
staff Comments:
Hallam Lake Bluff E.S.A. Review: The intent of the Hallam Lake
overlay area is to proYide a minimal level of protection. from
development impacts on the A.C.E.S. nature preserve below this
hillside. Various human impacts to the nature preserve that
concern A.C.E.S. include visual, noise, and light intrusion as well
as damage to the slope and vegetation which may increase runoff and
erosion. .
The review standards contained in the ordinance are as follows:
1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native
vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope.
Response: None of these activities will take place below the top
of slope per the application.
2. All development within the 15' setback fro~ the top of slope
shall be at grade. Any proposed deyelopment not at grade
within the 15' setback must be approved by special review
pursuant to Section 7-404D of this Article 7.
Response: An existing shed along the rear property line must be
removed as part of the reconstruction/addition to the residence.
The landscape plan does not show any other development (terraces,
decks, spas, or patios) between the hoUse and the top of slope.
Therefore, any contemplated development of this type must be
submitted for reyiew as an a~endment. to this E.S.A. reyiew.
3. All deYelop~ent outside the 15' setback from the top of slope
shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a 45
degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height
shall be measured and determined by the Zoning Officer
utilizing that definition set forth at Section 3-101 of this
Chapter 24.
Response:
The 3/9/93 revised section drawing shows that the
2
1""'\
1""'\
proposed structure to complies with this height limit.
4. A landscape plan shall be submitte~ with all development
applications. Such plan shall include native vegetatiye
screening of no less than 50 percent of the development as
yiewed from the rear (slope) 9f the parcel. All vegetative
screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be
replaced with the same or comparable material should it die.
Response: The landscaping plan indicates two huge spruce trees
which block from view a fair amount of the structure from the rear.
However, the tree-line sketch taken off of a photograph does not
adequately show if 50% screening is accomplished as viewed squarely
from the rear of the parcel. More information must be provided to
staff and ACES to make the final determination. It is recommended
that a supplemental landscape plan can be reviewed by staff and Tom
Cardamone prior to issuance of a building permit.
The plan also shows that three chokecherry trees and three russian
olives will be relocated to the rear property line. The russian
oliye is not a natiye species to this hillside area. Any tree
relocations must receive City's tree removal permits.
5. All exterior lighting shall be 'low and downcast with no
light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down
the slope.
Response: The application states that all exterior lighting will
be designed in accordance with this requirement except for
emergency lighting. This exception concerns both staff and Tom
Cardamone from ACES. Wall-mounted motion activated lighting would
be a disturbance to the nature sanctuary below this property.
Staff recommends a condition prohibiting wall-mounted motion
activated lighting. Only low-level (3' high max.) low voltage
pathway lighting should be used for emergency lighting.
No fill material or
slope. Historic
maintained. Pools
slope.
Response: The application states that this requirement will be met.
No hot tub is indicated on the plans. A drainage plan is being
required by Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit.
6.
debris shall be placed on the face of
drainage patterns and rates must
or hot tubs cannot be drained down
the
be
the
7. site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape
architect, or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing
and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent
elevations above sea level.
Response: The 3/9/93 revised sketch shows the slope and proposed
structure.
3
,
.
.
!
/
\\ / /
\.
'-'2>x IO'rrdl 0
~
RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of he Schermer Hallam
Lake Bluff ESA Review with the following condit
1.
Any trees slated for relocation
receiye tree remoyal/relocation
Department prior to issuance of a
(broken
permits
building
or ealthy)
fro the
permi
must
Parks
2.
Prior to issuance of any building permits, tree p otection
barricades must be erected at the drip lines of the t 0 large
spruces in the rear year. The barricades shall be cons~ucted
to preyent soil compaction, material storage, and spill~e of
deleterious substances under the trees. They shall rema~ in
place throughout exterior construction and grading. _,\
Compliance with Ordinance 1 is required. The cash-in-lifu
payment based on new construction (1,978 s.f.) in effect qt
the time must be paid prior to issuance of any buildin'g
permits. ~
If the driveway is shared with the neighbor per the original
site plan in the application, a signed access agreement must
accompany the building permit application. If the driveway I
is fully contained on the subject property, final design!
deta,ils must be included on the Building Permit site plan for I
approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the I
Building Permit. The curb cut cannot exceed 10' in width. I
A drainage plan for improvements from 1981 forward must bel
prepared by a registered engineer prior to issuance of at
building permit. Construction certification by the enginee~
must be provided prior to issuance of C.O. I
The site plan for building permit shall indicate a usablJ,
five foot wide pedestrian space. /
The fence which encroaches into the right-of-way must eit er
be removed or receive an encroachment license from the
Engineering Department prior to the issuance of any bui tUng,
permits.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
'-',9.
A landscape plan and rear yiew landscape sketches
submitted and approyed by ACES and Planning staff
issuance of any building permit. Only native vege
be in~talled in the rear yard.
-rftn~u~d~ deyelopment (including but not limited
to decks, spa, terrace, fencing) :~s.;. be sUDllllLL1 fv~:;;,T"
"ii".~Ji\ Qlu.....~~d~Ll~:alL Le1!hia E.~ A. ""~"';O~l. 5k11no ~. ~.IS-I
~lItek
10.
Only 'lQT.r-l~vpl (31 hiah max.) loYl vn]t-R'g~ r:a+-h"Jay li~l~tim.g
, ",UcCild be l:l'Seli f_,_o~"J<;>Rey CJ..ijJkting. t.bofS
, 0 ( iJ"\~ .,ov.r<€ I
7{fl<A-Ce , l..-I~~t pvf be v/s,bi< 4-hGM 4c.es) LrvUf /kJlt 'LL~M!vto.te
f'lMA 3 I Vl\ Kt :A"P'o"V:VIt 11 ~
-~r 6,0
~
,-,
--
11. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during pUblic meetings with the Historic
Preservation Committee and the Planning and Zoning commission
shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval,
unless otherwise amended by other conditions.
Exhibits: "A" - Vicinity Map
"B" - ,site Plan, Section, and Landscape Plan
"c" - Referral Memos ""
schermer.esa.memo
5
r".
PLANNINI(....~ING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT , APPROVED
19 BY BESOLUTIoN
,
;1
.j +
, ' I 1
1 !E ISilI1hif10 La I~!_
g 1, 2! i i!l ~ i3~!
. . :
.!
+
"
,
I
I - ~
i - .~ ::s
,
i l ' ) ><
, 't:
, 0 .
! ~
; )
I ::>
I
0 Z
, ri:l
p..,
w
<
$
'#
10
,
,
~~.1
.'........,,;,:.;.
".:,'::i;:"';',,
t
~
,y"
11~~jll~1!1{
...,.,...,.,..,.....,.
Ai' r~".
::;--."
"',"'\.~, l'
~..'e
\
'\
....... .
to Re...h.
J
~
IKlI!r AIlBA '
'/
'. ---.,'
!
I,
I
.,)J.........
tuo(~ . ;';'
~
-'",,"
I
,
i
,
~_,...,
'. . ~ I
.......
,6'
{'W""""""""
Screen I
I
,
SI:.'TBACK IJ.NE
PERTY LINE
I ., - :-- ..'---
I/~/\-
,/1..,,,, 7iB-,
I' 210 LAKE AVE
(,
"'viuJ<~
-
:,
---
0" :'_______________
~~---\--,
~ctL..,. &..1
;<'
.""., ~ .
, -"~'" ....~ .t,' ....J.. .r'
.~
-..........
~
/(/
~~/.I ~
~
I
Eo<
5i!
, ~,'
~ .'
tI.I
10
t'
,
,<<
8-
o:~
'II- E-
~I~
gill
~
p..
,~
~,
,~
~
tf
o
a:l
,<
~
~
:6
CD
, .
Z
~
,,- .. . ,~. ,. ", '~I~~~:~~.~~=,~~- <:
~
~
~,
~
<
~
6~
~..
C\"r
~','
o
Z
~
~'
~
~
~
~.
~
.~
o
w
.-"
~ .
ilt~
~ ~o ~~
,.4.I,~, , ..
9".... :...
J " ,,;,:
19 ~.
w~
..J ;'
\l1
~
,^I.;1II1:JC/ -JdH
NO! ';}o"':;J~ <;;l.~.;i~
~
! z
. Q
t),
fi3
.~
00
~.
>-
Ei3
,0' ~
, ";:g
~
.!t
;..
.~
Q
to
. .7...
. ..,-; . "q,!~ ,"t.",.' ,,:..,.," ~ . ;,,~. ..:.'1: _::t~,', ", .
~ ~~:i \ .Af.." '" S";':~'~f.h ~~~.
, " '" ,IP,.;- ~:i ...__~,... .' ~..~ :,-:-:" c;.. :"".'::':~'~
., '". .:"... \ '",: '\:. ...,~....., " ~- - :'{
. '. I ~ . I) ..'" ,"'" .... .. "
" l!~;""'~"'" ~~ " .:.; ~. .. ... ,.
I' . ,".... '---:-1:,0.. :.., ,:,'l'io.~. " ,'. , .
"I ,. I '\.....,,,, ',','.fI!'''. .. ...,-:.... '''...."
!I.J...::....:... ' ~:..:~",~.,i,,,.::,,'.~'~:'...:::::::;:..~' ',. '"
.Im-:~.~"i . ~ .....,~IJ"....~ .,--,:=-,-::':-
;h,. ~ I, "'~~'Io'I",.~~""--''':''.
i.U:.,.1 ::;~ .;,.~.,.," ~"~lr-'-" ...,-""
_ ,....O;:,..A.,....:. ..rll..,J"'," -~,.' ~
. . _~ . -. ,I"'. ....:r.r-' . "
,,:.'i,. ""~~"''''''''':'I ~ ~.
'\ .~" Ii '.' - I ~ ,..
: ir. ':"I"~" ".,"
.:'~.~;..':;'/:....
. " .._,~...~~'.' '
__.':- -b,.f~i'"
:..-... ':';;:'-~-.)~':~~' \ ~ - ~,"",,-",
,..,.:-:~~~~~~,~.:'. 2~;'~ "",:.t\~;.'-', ..~
~:, . .', ,.',~.-~=~:~' : .. --. 0\ ..... " ..-~~.......
~.. .... <j';': :~'/: .~ ....:--:::-....~J").
.. . ...... ;r':~~~!p.:. .; .)P't'r~\'
-......;v .........J ..... .\ :'.' .; ~,"". ..... .~, .
". .,...- -..:;.:..... ~. .' ..... ,..,.,,'~'.),. .-"'> ~ "" . .
J ~-;'.&~ "..;."" ^ .{'".", '". ;., .,. ,;" /.'.,';'-')'~ '^ ,
_' '::-:~":,"'."':.l ~Co{'~.,...'!V! ~ ~\/I /~.~~;.. r::;n.'~IV-;'(.:' ..
.~..~ Ifl.":r,,,I~o,;.,_. t" .~'lII'~"'''~''J"I'1' ....""..,lI.....,&I I ,,\
_;.~, ~ . ..~ll.(.t"'\". .." .... ......:0 .4..., ~ '/ /J" ".. ..," ,,~. ,~r...~' ,"
'",.'" I . O:Z~'I' ,.~..::'f...'I:;'~..' ""l.,.'..',";IU'.!.=" __."t ,T' ~';J;r"":"::,,,,,~:'\. ":'I.~,r,~
"7 ,...... "' . ~'" . I ,,""," .-.. "., " ,. ~'t ~,. I
. :. ~,./ .:... "4"4 ,..... ..... _:.. "....~,.;..I~::-~. I ........:.... .', ~I'" .,,~,,: . ~ 'Ii ' j,
, _. . V~ .....,. . . '", .. "il't',.,~(.ol~" ..~~. ..~. .' '.'~".:1';'~": . (.
. ~. ~~"j:l; ("~;. .'hi:' ~.,r.;;i...t~~.iP;" ;'~ ;:\:.; ,';,Z.'1' ..'.\,:';E-i/'''CV''
_~ "I~G':;;';),"")' "il~:~~~'~' :...~, .~" -. ".I..\iV~"'."~ '
_.,...... .~....=::..~..r!..;c:..n~/~\~..,.;...:.! .~i:qS.~r,. ~V'''I.!;.,,:. .;.
._ -..,..;00'...,., '::' - - 'l!' ~, N . .,....". . .:..': . . *,
.~..~':;;'7.. ....1 ". ..1 ..: .,.r;., ",.:'" ,,<,
,...~".. :.\..~.,.., ....,~~ ,~..":;,,," ;';\:-.l'. :L.. ~."
"\ ..' . .)-....:~ .....!-},' .... ., : ~:.~', .' ., . .1:' 1.~
I' r.ow ';(i:[,.J"T .. ~. ~ ~~~ J ,,11II1 .... ." '" ~ '1,;'": ;/.
... ~ r-....v....r= ~'"""'. ,..,,,\.1,. ..I....~. fS" " .
__:--...~ . ~,~.~......'":t -" ^-..... '1"'';''. .......... ",
......... _ _ _ 4" , "" (!':, A (..~ " I" ., r. "
'-.::- -;:"?J;.':- ':-.. ~~ i; ';,~~~ : Wt::~\~~" .\: v't1?~ ':
~' _ '"tJ!rr~"~ .....'1.. f'\ ..
-I' ""-'if."; =1,C; \ ;..,;j!:I.. : ~.., --. II" ~,(~
.... ;...."'1.:.:. '=i:::':'; ~. .' . "'MJ:'i.~" ,,-..J ~...;.i; ;: .
.. ..... ... _____ & .' ' '" '\.~~ .....J"".- \,.\\1:, . \ - ^ .
"io' _.,""-~ ~. ....y.....}"..... ....v' '1:
')0' :. ...i .'. "'- \ "..' 'r .1.-..'IoC,{...:........,. .." 'I ~:' ...... I~
._.~ ,. ...... . '7'\..,/'.,-......"" ft"_.'-',,,)o' . "(
., . ~r:,;I::s!""..;':': . .;.C~""l..;.1 \~:...-l.";.P:?"i;.ll:::r.;;:< ~'\~. ....$ (. ~
. ,...:!.:~ 'l~.;.i.j:":, ...".... ".... ,'~,.\'........)".l..... .'. .
r~"~" ...:.,,,,&,,,':';'~'~.::':I ;.;~ .'... . .:;.,~;', ~:"'=,'!i"',' ~'.01-!....-') ~r~~'" ~.
. L_....JOII. I.....,... ,.,. 'I' .,' V' ~ ~.t_/:"
....,.....~..~.'" ~~r;'."...:.r~ 1".:.iI"~~"'~''':'''':'':''.~ ~i', ."..,.'~..~:"~'...'."r...r.:'_-=:i.'I~,,,, I,~:..:.!.. '~J
"-"" . ~lw ':/".u,.... ,...,.~.. Oil"':', .,'", : . ".,'iJ ,. "', . ..,"r. - -
",\,'...... ~......--.:""I,,'~.'N ...... "'~'"'.'I'''=''' ,'..,r,.,"".""" '. '.' .":"'I~';;.'"'' .,~,..' ....~"!'~.'.F-
\..'..l '~"''', . ......jj. '1""".L"~ ""1' ,.~:r' '~JI"'!' 1 .,.." ~.. .....
<",:""~,,:,',:"'-4';lk~"~'''''''''''~~''''~''''';o,~:;.'v:,,.,.;-;..i.'-j,. :". :..".' ':';""!'.":':"."',,,:,::,;,:~ --;;:;
";:'''S. I ":"~:"lr"Sl:!':if{'f'f',;,":(k~~'~~':"'k"!V''''';-'I,.:r.....:......:~. '. ....~". ....l.~....\:'.... ...'i":.
ii'~~~' ~~!lFi~~\~:i~:fl;;::Q(:;J1iVdt'4itI~!Mh ..
. -"".:..i'l,~;a;' ..:1I6&i~!~~..:. ~"J,l:",~..,... ...~., ~, \~.~ ./1A ',' 'I " .. .,,'.,..
v Q-:4-,,;:;,( ,.f;~~'~~:~'ttt~f..;.....'"'4'-;:~ ,."r-:.~~..!.,...~~~':.: '.; ..,~ J .....1 -:'''' r .' ~ '."V. "
. ....,...'.~..'..:I.:),~~?;~:;l:~ ,.~i':'~:'::~, ~.' .. .: . :. ~ "':.1' '.1 :. '" . ~..~' "
';-";.~'~!;~lj,,~~:~ .........:. ;~~ ::- .~\ ......~..' .~;~. =.::.:_'~~...,
.~".."""~'I ~ tIo.'!.'.<\,."':'''''' . \!\{" ~~ t. P-...;~ I
.. ,l,"'I....-:......."..''I'-l'~"..~....'" ;,.- .:,' 'tW ~. .~- I
,,,' " ....v.. ..... -' ,.. .!',;. .-.... . "'I'~ " _ ,
1\ ..J.....:."'i...~.,,~.....'~.,..'~~~:....,'..r,.. ......~\'::'.. Il:,.....~... .lr.....I;w'fr~...Io.... ':. :'
-<..,;; .. '~A" ! "A..t;.Io '. ,..' . , I' .,.'JJ. ~ .' .,.a'r,.;, . .", .' (
<"" ,,'........ 'too", Co ".1...."= ~~,~I.l1:'1."''!''l\..Y4.'1(,.'':,~,~:a:. ,~'""..'.~.)IIo,.'~: ...:.L'r~~.:u.i.::.!;""i~'".~~..,:i!:'~''''' 'i~',:";~"",, "
,,~..,., ...~ '..._ ""Ii; ) J.' ~ "1''1 _..' ,~...,I.lUIi!'" ~ ~ . .,.".".. I li1.. ,,\:"l ~I"'\ (il'"' I',' ~ . .
..~,,:. S ....1~,1o~.>t.:'o--("~-.JI.....~''----- .=....,,~...., ,~ ,~,.,,'<"I'''':i~'''I:h''~'';'~' .r,; ~'l~..'\il",)(~ ",":'.,,!"":"''t~:.J~ ..if ,,~,,:'~i'~~'. :i.'" . (.
'"' ,.~. . .~ ,~,...._. .' ,.,'1". i'" .... ..,..... .( . .,> .... ...... ..".. ..4~" '
,', .'. ...?",..,' '0::,.; ", ..d "...~::...::~ .:.".'.' ,,'.~..~.....~1l;:~..; '.'l'~".':t.' '."".' '.. ...'
,^.'!~;: :,:~~.a,~"..:ytl'''ft~\ :~~~i!..~,~'~ i1I,::'~,-~ifrl>-.~~~~!'.f~'.i': ~,.l~':'.,; ~I.: ~'~fA'f:.~'..~,':~~~,:~~~!l'~i.~r-.~~..."~~i ~~~,,"~" :.,,:-:, ~. r
....-.,.. ..,.... ",,.:( .' . ...., . . oJ!. ....~li. :QJ~~" .... (. ..I, .-. i;r..~" .......". .. (
~!.7d~,o..f..~!i1::' ':1;'10. '..l:f,~j_~a'~"'f:."~~i;:*; ~.~t;:jf!jl;;i~I!iZ';ly,.:l.fj'~;P:. ;::.:f; <tiU':': : ,
~:.,,;~j,:.~~ /1-"'~ .~t' I ;;ifV"V~~.:stl'!:' ~~'.;~:!::J.jrr;:~:{,~;~' :~~i:{,,;:'.'I. :i'~:~yV~i'iM~'ij;;~:'" ~:.:r~' :"~~0\' ~..""'.~ !.: (
v 1" (,' .~1\' ~"')~~",.3.".. .~..'I,;'I'l,'.......-::....,...,~:~':A!!"""' ''!II'' ~ wI-l \ " ~' I ;
. " '1 .'~'. " . ." '1.1 .;;.' "I';;: .;: :i."~': · -, ..........>',-:;...;. i:'i.~ ,. '. i..... . .. .\." J: !.'. . ':
" ...;,. . II.';;.' ~.;.,. ,..r,..:,....,..::;;:.:.. :'.~ . ~'" ~'.~" ,:., ~,"..'.<:.' s,.,.........' : ". ":,. . ( . I
, \. ~:..:~r ~...' '.".;1'."I,;..;'l-.".,.~,...'~..:.....:..'.:t'i...;::r-i~~t' 'ii:." .' .,:..
..,~..... .. ..... ......,.. d''1''': ,:~~,.-(,~...',... ;.".,;,.))'.\\'1:.: ...:....). ....
;..-"'IIl::;:--. ,....,,~. , \ '. .~ ... ''',~, J..,.....,,, "a !" "~\' '., ,"", ,....1. " .'.1
...~. ,......___... _.... _.._ ,...... .. ~_ "o"~' . ..' .
-:.:.::;;..".~~~.,......._...., ,_. .i.......... ..;.~,.;...~ ..,.~..('.. ' ,;.:;!,., I.'
r~' fi.' _, . fI -..... -"'. ~.'" ~ Nl" ..~ .... .
.\~:~;' '.".. ..... .-:~ '..':-.'\', .,.......,i~J...... (......,....:;.."
. I~T.;. 1'~I;...:?~I'~" 1.~..S$.J:.J1.,V...II~.:");,~. ...
... __...:""". "'. ~ ".,I' I\..r~)~:"~I:-1ti \, - I ." (' "...... ,."J'.,... (
'1,'. r. '.' ,,~'., : '~.H."~' I' "~.L""'" .'(... ....'." .'j
. .'~' .., r: j ~ ,-, ...".;:...~ '.,
~;
'~""'\"',,'~"",
..
'j,
.
..
r "
{.
.
.
I
I
~
.
.
-_.""'-'"
""'r'.... '::I
. -..f
, .
,..; )
),,' .:
~
(l t I "".
,I. ~.
l:: Ill. C
'.' ::( ."
~l \:;: ..:,i
\,' '.~ '"
...." ...'"" I..,"
. ',I ' . \
...."_. \,; .'
. . ,~.,..
,'-'. . ~
"
:.
.'
;
t""\,
i:i'
.~:\.
L.~
-H;
B
."
i I
~. ,
:I_~,_. ..,. II
r".
\ / ';""-'--~'~'r'
\ '. ~,.,,~",
, :.~ i,l r
, \, .!\ 'j I
\ . ii','",,,," ':
"'~'~'i. '
. '
:-....,.....
':~:~~~~. n~\ 1 n i] 1 :1. Ii I .]cJU~ ...
--~~:'/ t '.1 JII_J . ~---'-": .~
k
. PROPOSED ADDITION
..~
PROPOSED, ( \
NORTH ELEVATION ~It J
.
11
~
//'-.....'-.
~
I
I
I
..
~
~
on
~
'"
f' ........
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
w
w
.
...
... ~
, 1;>"'
. ~ .
~
~
~
~ ~
~
'"
'"
c I
~ :t
u. I
! -/
J I
I
{,I
J1'
~
<.;
':>'
,,"
</.
",\,'
~ ~'
'\;
",<;
~.;.
"l'
","'...<;
'^'
"<:)~
-----
R . 401,
'110.""")'0 ~'?
. ..... " ,'. Q,'"
~' '-, ~~"',
>~ ~ "'" ",,'
I ~...~ "" ",~..,. ....'~.."
I . "" "'-fO'" '1;
" <>~'"
<:> ~\'" I '~\"
\ . ..."'...."'... I
.................. \ <,)-.; I '~
\ ... I '-'"
.... / 'to,
... ......... , , '"
l:l - - 11 - - 11 - - If ""-... ~ ",/ , ~..,.~
1 '-:::......_ "'~
1 "-~, _~.. ""~<S-
v. ',"_ '~~ ,~~....
' '" ',IJ"~~
~ I 'y
'I ....'~\'" '{I
'" </.... I
~ 0 1/
y
//1
-----'" I ~~*-
<>,
----j IJ"
I 1
~I
~ 1
1
{
(
f
"'~..
'" '"
,,', '0'
!s~ff f
"'j ;..,
..
j ~
r
I
I JivIS.Et:>
~~
I ~I-AN
,,,", ' r'l)r3
<1<J " <.;'"
","'<.;'" "'1;,,,0,..'"
./ "~,,,oIf. ",";,;' ~ ~.., t '
- ""/~ / ",. '" ~ ,"
- --- - - ",. ,::,oIf.';!;'I-'"
~~4Ji",
'"
I"'"
..................
.....-
...'
'"
,,\,,<:)
"'",">
I
I
,.
I
L.: '.
I
I
I
I
I
'I
, \
I \
, ,
. ,
,-
{
F
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
,
I
I
I
,
1::~
I
I
I
,
I
~i
1
{
II
I
r
,....'. ~
, I #'
~
I 1 "'~'"
Lj'/'001f.
I I
I {
I
........-----~I
-- -. .--.....;:; - - --J
lO,l. 63,65
-----------
o 1 . 65.0 ~ ---'.r-
/ /
I
(
I'
b
~
""!'II" <.;'"
"'1-,,,'0 '0'
""~' ,,"
........"i ~I</.,
..'~. ,"
,~ "'~...
!<.,' ll' '1;
CO 4Ji",
~"
'I
1
/,
1
1 ...'"
",q,.
! </.~'"
""",
q,.'<;
"
'to
~ ~
~ ,".
!:J'l,' "... ...~,
G \ , ~
~ ,'I- . '" '
'" <:) ~ I<;
"'. ",<; ~"'...~ ,
~ ...'" <:)<i> !v <{!.
~;:;'l:' ~ ",,</! "
CO<f. ~'"
~ ",'"
,~
r"'-,
PLANNI~ ZONING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT ' C/ , APPROVED
19 ___ BY RESOLUTION
MEMORANDUM
,
To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office
From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer (]."R-
Date: March 10, 1993
Re: Schermer Hallam Lake Review - Additional Information
Parking & Driveway - Section 19-101 of the Municipal Code specifies that there be 25'
between driveways/curb cuts, "except common driveways may be used on adjoining
properties." The land use review process is not intended to provide final approvals for
development in the public right-of-way, which approval is obtained when excavation
permits are applied for. However it is desirable to identify as many issues as possible.
The xerox copy of the map. that you dropped off only shows two parking spaces. The
other two still must be indicated on the final development plan. The 19'.20.5' is
acceptable for the turning radius into the garage.
I would prefer for the driveway width in the public right-of-way to be 10' with the
widening for parking spaces to be on private propertY. The 19' does provide adequate
width for the parallel parking maneuver.
Section 19-101(a) of the code requires that the driveway apron between the valley pan at
the pavement edge and the property line be paved for the full width of the driveway.
cc: ,Bob Gish, Public Works Director
M93.65
~
~,
MEMORANDUM
To: ' Kim Johnson, Planning Office
From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer ~1Z-
Date: February 27, 1993
Re: Schermer Hallam Lake Review
Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the
Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. Parking - Reference is made in the application to providing on-site parking. This
should be documented on a development plan. The applicant requests a "variance" in
parking requirements from five spaces to four. Is this a variance that is granted by the
HPC given the designation of the property? Since the project is providing an excellent
improvement by adding four on-site parking spaces, the Engineering Department would
not object to permitting one less space than required by code. We do however need to
have a plan showing the spaces in order to be able to certify their size and vehicle turning
movements.
Driveway - The application discusses an agreement to use the adjacent property
owners driveway. Having one less curb cut and driveway is a benefit to the neighborhood
as well as to the applicant and the project. Perhaps the applicant should obtain a written
easement for the driveway use.
2. Storm Runoff - The history of additions to the structure is not clear as regards storm
runoff considerations. The 1981 subdivision approvals for this property included
compliance with Section 24-7-1004.CA,f of the Municipal Code. The site visit did not
reveal an obvious drainage problem either onto Lake Street or over the hillside into
Hallam Lake. However, a drainage plan for improvements since 1981 and for currently
proposed improvements, including any new impermeable surfaces such as a concrete patio,
must be prepared by a registered engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Any
drainage mitigation measures designed by the engineer shall be certified as constructed
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Mitigation of storm run-off during project construction should be provided as
needed to keep any storm runoff from exposed earth on site.
3. Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-
of-way, we would advise the applicant as follows:
.'-'"
,-",
The applicant shall consult City Engineering (920-5080) for design
considerations of development within public rights-of-way, Parks Department
(920-5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or
development, including. landscaping, within public rights-of-way from Streets
Department (920-5130).
This requirement relates to referenced proposed landscaping improvements and any other
work contemplated for the public right-of-way adjacent to the applicant's property, The
Engineering Department is particularly concerned about possible landscaping proposals for
the public right-of-way. The site improvement survey makes reference to a site plan for
proposed landscaping revisions, but we did not receive a copy of landscaping proposals.
"Sidewalk" -The recently adopted Pedestrian Plan has reinforced the public right-of-way
design guideline of West End area residences maintaining a space of the public right-of-
way to be usable for pedestrians, The construction of concrete sidewalks is not required
and is in fact prohibited in the West End, but the final project site plan must indicate a
usable, five foot wide pedestrian space, preferably with a five foot buffer area between
the edge of the concrete drainage pan and the pedestrian use area. The site visit did not
reveal landscaping underneath the snow, but there was no existing vegetation visible that
would compromise pedestrian use.
Encroachment - There is a fence that encroaches into the public right-of-way about four
feet. It would be typical to require such an encroachment to be relocated at a time when
redevelopment of a property is being undertaken. The proposed redevelopment should
include relocating the fence onto the applicant's property, hOwever the applicant does have
the right to apply for an encroachment license from the Engineering Department.
Recommended Conditions of Approval
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a development plan shall be submitted to and
approved by the Engineering Department.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan prepared by a registered
engineer must be submitted which addresses new construction and meets the requirements
of Section 24-7-1004.CA.f of the Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of a C.O., the
engineer must certify the construction of any drainage improvements.
3, The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts which may be
formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in the public right-of-way.
cc: Bob Gish, Public Works Director
M93.5Z
,......
,-...
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Kim Johnson, Planning Office
Tom Baker, Housing Offi~
February 16, 1993
TO:
DATE:
RE:
Referral Comment: Schermer Hallam Lake Review
REFERRAL COMMENT: Article 5 Division 7 Affordable Housing Impact
Fee (aka Ordinance 1, 1990) applies to this application.
Based upon the information in the application package, it appears
that the applicant will be required to mitigate for 1,978 square
feet of new construction. Currently, the cash-in-lieu payment for
this type of development is $8.33/square foot of new construction.
However, the cash-in-lieu payment shall be determined at the time
of building permit and is based upon the existing cash-in-lieu
requirement for a moderate income employee.
ref. schermer
1
. '.
,~:: .:
~'~;~;.:i(. ....., ~ ,:,:.' :':~' ~:l ,"
.,..."r...l. ,..,-!~
: ':,,' . ."",
. ~~~.: .~':~'~ :':'"i ::..~,' ':'1:~:,~:.')~::~ ~:~\~~~';~;:'''''~~' ~"
"..>,' ,."~,,;$<i!\'"jI;~~,~.,,:1!i,W':~;j,,.i>llt:,.,
.' . ': ':. ;,,,", :: ... :',~ ~:. . : :'",;:./ !':':: ': ......
". .:- ':~:... .
;'." ".
:~~~~~~~~~{~A~~i~~;::;~~":' .'
.....,.,.....:.......,...
...:..~:.~.
" '('::'
;:.A:~~::~:,
:i..:,~t::;;::.;;~~~~~~~:
.....!...;.
...:~:>-~:f.o:':..:.'(:.. :,"
..:':,:,'
:.'
. . . ~;':.::
.~. ::.
.....:;'::..
. . : ::~;~;:~~:~~~::~;:.~;~:iH.:~::i;'i~~~~~~~:~~;~:~~~;:'
,",
-..:..-,..
~...'''' :::.:.,.
. " :~;~:;:: .; .
fS. .!..';9.L2:
I""'"
I '.,.... '. "".". i;~,,1ti~~~q~kA,;~...
'i~_,..,'._',"".,.".,',
F."..,'" lit,.",.,.,..,..",. ., - .. ' . ,',.. .~" ..,.....,
!
I
<;;;:.:;
;~;;:;~!~~~t~:::
:-:;~;:
>~;~l::i.:;~;
'i"~:L:;>:
.:.: ::~
:::'::(FH;~n~~
,~""
:~i::"'l;t.::\:< ::}!{21':;';,P)W:~~f:1>>t"
, '
.. ,.., "":::~{,:/,:"~=~,,,"~::'::"".
,:'~~'~ '.
~-. ..,. -"-~_.-i' ~-..r-
~_' J. .l, ~-i'~-
:t 30 SOUTi-:
..-.....::::.~r-::-ib_li. ..-~..-"
;r'"1~..Ji !l-S'QJ::i """;,,,-,,_,,
920~'5e0e
........~;-:.r:-.....~
r'3""-S~ ll-~ 'Ii
GAL E:'-": A
E:i61':1,
),::,:':
RECEIF*T
.....
.....
....c::"-..c....-l.;-
A.. -J";;"'''_.""" ..-_..
.....:
I;.;t.:= fi5/24,.-'93 Tiil!':: 15::3942
~_~.:_~. ~4 ~L_~~"._. n4
.....0.=-11.1.'='1" t.'... ..l,....::;J....",....;j...;;;.;.
R;::;;.r- ~~...".. -~'" c''-'lIl'''"PhiEt'::. .'r,'-,Tt ~. ,"-:'~ "','
_}~Ie1H..,=,. .........lt1...l"..il r;....vi\.v J.i'.:....:.t.
AC':':".-int i"J;",iillb:;t:
Lo?j::;~r AC':;)i..itl"t. ~
,-,_~_" '"'I.."r.~.
'_"-"..1'=. .,'f""'r';'':''
f';~.:,;:;tai;! ~
LA~<E
AVE
. . .:"':
',' . .".::...:.:.:;~t;:,~li~::~~:::;;~,;.:~:::',. ,
15;'::302gf;:':~;0S:::0f,S
/.,.,..~. ........ ~
;,;n'_".ii !'....
$27~6i7,.3:)
.. - ,_~. ...I..
_"";"\C"'....
,-.,....c.;..
<-.r;.-",
..08
, "
:~~;,:'~;::~~i'j :::';,:'
-'1:-'-".
.;.,.j 0...'_'1"".
~,-,''!''.'''.i
i ''.w'. rH...
;:'7 ~ ,:'17' ,,}~'
2(;.617 .:3':~;
".'
, .
~.: ','::~::j::,:....;;..
, :r..~:-...~~.:'~\.;~.:...'
.....~...:::.:-~...l'O:.....~... .
:. ~:. ".~ ~:t' :;". :'... ;.'
,.,','..;.,'. .,
t
i
''''I
.....\';.,.,
A ~-.; i< :..,..6/'0' .,tJ'~ 1
.,-:;------.- ---.-----,-.;:,
'.' ...:::,
..>;,::,:.-:: ;~~~~: .
::::-;;::;n;c
.:~..,~" .
.. :,,'" .:"
.' . .
.' ..;::: ;::::~~7} ~~..:~~~~.'I:f":"
,.... ' .
....;"'"',.
"~"
..
00
(")
~'
t%j
,;:0
~
;:0
~
~
z
'0
,.,t%j
-,~
"~
o
~
,~'
~
'tz:.j
~
~
~
,_'~_' 0' ,,' '
......... ,_---== _ ~OCS:LO-e 1,1 - -
C;; - _CC~.f'"",ER
~
,z
a
Q-
t"'4'
~
>
t::;
o
~
..,
~
::z:l
."
, t;I;:l
~~
H~}ffJe, ~ lOW
I2.f:"VIE'\~~
~d
, fT( \J
~'O
::;l :9~
t#.l 0 Jl
~ ~~
.-
-"l ,
Dl.,
)-.,
~
~,
...
If
...
<:<
~--
t:j
~
<:
,ti3
:a
~
gj
-~
~ t
~
-.l
>-
;.;!
8
IO;j
;;:l
~
.-.
~
~
! ;
..~.,. -,.-
~
~
..
COTTLE
GRAYBEAL
YAW
ARCHITECTS
UD '
JOHN COTTLE. AlA
DOUG GRAYBEAL, AlA
LARRY YAw, AlA
MARK IiENTHORN, AlA
510 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 21
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
PHONE 303/925-2867
FAX 303/925-3736
I""
1"",.
!
January 14, 1993
City of Aspen Planning Office
Aspen Historic Preservation Committee
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen City Hall
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Planning Officials, Commissioners and Committee Members:
On behalf of the Schermer's I summit this application for Significant Historic
Development and Hallam Lake Review. Attached are the required documents for
these reviews. Please contact me with any questions about this documentation.
My clients the Schermers have recently purchased the property on Lot 19, Block 103;
Hallam's Addition Aspen, Colorado also known as 210 Lake Avenue Aspen,
Colorado. They intent to renovate the existing single family residence, add a
basement, built an addition on to the existing structure and use it as a duplex. The
two units wilI be used by family members and not condominiumized or sold off as
separate units.
The existing structure is the last in a series of single family residences in the
neighborhood to be developed into duplex units. The lot is within the WPW
Subdivision approved in 1978. The lot was purchased by Nancy Oliphant after the
subdivision. It was renovated and added on to in 1979,1980. Part of the front
porch was enclosed, windows replaced and the house resided. In 1981 a new
enclosed rear porch or greenhouse/hot tub room was added. These are two of many
additions made to the property through time.
In 1990 the house was investigated by the Aspen Planning Office for its historical
significance, At that time it was determined the "Integrity has been comprised due to
substantial modification" and "the significance of this residential structure is not of
those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is
representative of Aspen's mining era, It is of historical importance by illustrating the
family home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen of Aspen which was
dominated by the silver mining industry". At the time it was also noted the house
has had as many as four additions. In 1980 another study provided similar findings
"represents a type, period, or method of construction and contributes to the
significance of a historic district" At that time this was a minor category finding,
See attached information, I understand from Nancy Oliphant she tried to have the
house designated as a historic structure after her purchase and was deigned,
According to the attached documents she was told by Sam Caudill that it "wasn't
worth it". In 1980 after a renovation she successfully achieved designation as a
historic structure. See attached resolution by the Aspen Historic Preservation
Committee. This designation was achieved after part of the front porch was enclosed
~\
,,,,",
"- !.
and the rear porch enclosed area was added.
In 1990 Nancy Oliphant was granted an approval by the Historic Preservation
Committee for an extended back porch and a second story addition. The
improvements were never made. See attached letter and information from Nick Mc
Grath.
During Nancy's renovation a new foundation was added to support the structure.
D nfortunately the crawl space under the house was dug out further to accommodate
a mechanical system and adequate ground support for the foundation did not
remain. To remedy this situation we intend to temporarily relocate the structure on
the property, build a new foundation and basement then replace the structure on the
new supports.
During the 1979-1980 renovation the house was totally resided and trimmed, several
of the windows were replaced, in one case with a bay window and a metal roof was
added. We intent to remove the metal roof replace it with new wood shingles and
restructure the roof to support current snow load requirements. We also intent to
remove the bay window and part of the structure. Appropriately scaled double hung,
double glazed thermal windows will replace dilapidated and inappropriate windows.
There are several manufactures who are replicating older windows with current
technologies and energy saving features, We wish to take advantage of these
improvements. We also are relocating two windows to work better with the space
inside the existing structure. Several windows appear to have been relocated during
the previous renovations and our relocation will enhance the overall appearance.
The existing siding which is not original will be replaced with new siding of the same
scale and proportions.
To accommodate some of the difficulties of the site and the desire to provide off
I street parking for the property that current possess none, the latest rear porch
addition and one or two of the earlier additions to the structure will be removed.
This will allow the duplex layout to be configured so we may share and improve an
existing driveway with the neighbor to the west, 212 Lake Avenue, The removal of
these later additions also allows the duplex to be configured so a visual break from
the old to the new is provided, This will also allow two very large evergreens in the
rear of the property to be retained. We have meet with the owner of 212 Lake
Avenue, Jonathon Lewis and he has approved of the share driveway and layout
shown in the attached drawings,
With the sharing of a driveway to create off street parking on a property that
currently has none we request a variance from the required five parking spaces to
four spaces, This is appropriate for the property location. We understand
surrounding properties have received approvals for less off street parking,
On the front side of the structure we will be removing the enclosed porch addition
and returning this area to its original appearance. As stated in the research
"
1.
,~>
?'
" '
,
.;t"\
t""'\,;
document produced by the planning office the house is of historic importance by
illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of Aspen not because of its
architecture, We are holding back the addition to the structure so the original shape
of the cross gabled roof is still evident. Behind the crossing of the main roof a
dormerekment has been added on the east leavirig the existing eave line exposed.
Where the original eave line ends the addition has been stepped back to differentiate
between old and new. On the west the new addition has been stepped forward with
a change in roof form to again differentiate between old and new. The main roof
element behind the, original cross gabled roof form is another higher cross gabled
roof to reflect on the unique character of the original but not to mimic it. In this
case different roof forms from the different elements of the house intersect the main
roof breaking up the massing adding interest.
A small shed structure exist on and over the rear property line. It was renovated
into a garage, small office and bedroom space by the previous owner. In a
conversation with the previous owner she indicated a nothing substandard structure
was severely modified into useable space. In a conversation with Tom Caradome of
the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies he recalled the shed renovation being
two smaller sheds converted into one larger structure. The shed violates the require
building setbacks and the Hallam Lake Bluff Review standards, plus many Aspen
building code requirements. We intend to remove the structure. In researching the
original subdivision of the property, the original survey shows no shed structure(s) in
this location. The documents do show and discuss a larger structure on this and an
adjacent lot. This structure was required to be removed during subdivision and was
done so. In researching the historic records in the Aspen planning office with
Roxanne Eflin and the records of the Aspen Historic Society no evidence of this
shed(s) existence was uncovered.
The renovation and addition proposed to this property will allow the preservation of
the home environment of the residence and its historic importance to the
community. It is the last of several structures in the neighborhood to be renovated
and added onto. The size and scale of this new structure will be smaller than the
adjacent structures. The ratio of building foot print and building size to lot area is
smaller than two similar structures directly west. Being an infill project between two
larger residences and the last in a row of renovated single family residences into
duplex structures, this project is appropriate and consistent with the character of the
neighborhood and the community. It preserves the character for the original
structure and clearly separates old for new. The architectural integrity of the structure
has been enhanced and the addition does not diminish or detract from the original
structure.
Because of the constraints of the site and the desire to preserve the integrity of the
original structure we are requesting the approval of a variance to allow a stairway
from the lower level basement to encroach into the east setback by a maximum of
three feet. This request is appropriate since the stairway serves as a code required
egress from the lower level and is a below grade encroachment. Per the City of
'.
,
r~
; . .Z:
!~\
Aspen Planning Office request this encroachment has been discussed with the City if
Aspen Building Department and they feel the request is appropriate.
We appreciate your time and efforts in reviewing this application. Our request are
reasonable and comply with the intent of the code and the preservation of historic
structures as' they have been classified for the benefit of the community.
Sincerely,
~ ~l
DO~y~al ~~ "'-
Principal
Attachments
f~-;
~\
, ,
,
January 14, 1992
210 Lake Avenue Response to Hallam Lake Review Standards
~
Requirements Response
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
No development, excavation or fill will take place below the top of slope.
All development within the 1;; foot setback will be at grade.-
All development outside the 15 foot setback from the top of slope will not eXceed a height
delineated by a line drawn at a 45 -degree angle from ground level at the top of slope.
A landscape plan for the property is attached. Native vegetation will be retained and used
for 50 percent of the development as viewed from the'rear (slope) of the parcel. All
vegetation will be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or
comparable material shbuld it die.
\
All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature
preserve or located down the slope, except for emergency security lighting attached to the
. building.
[,.
-'\
No fill materials or debris will be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage'
patterns ancj ~ateswill be retained. No pools or hot tubs will drain down the slope.
(7) _ A .site se~tion drawn by a registered architect showing all existing and proposed site
elements, the top of slope, an~ pertinent elevations llbove sea level is attached.
./
,
,~;,
.-... '
I ','
~
~.
~
~
~
f::l'
:>
~
~
~ <>
~ l
=~
o
,G),
'~.;
,
zr
~"
~
<(
~.,
~,..
~
'~
,~.,
..:q,
o~"
~-
C'\r'
~l
0:
Z
~
S
00
~'
~
~
~
~
~'
~
. .:I:l
o
00
.....-,..-
::;l
~
,~
~
~
~
~
::;l
~
~
~
~
~
,~
t=J
,
.
P:z:Uject Name
.tU.~- X
lAND USE 2\Pl?IJ:CATICN l'tlf<M
, ~.
ScL mer Residence
:'""'-
~)
2) 'P.roject IDeation 210 Lake Avenue, Aspen, Colorado
Lot 19, Block 103, Hallam's Addition to the City & ToWnsite of Aspen
(inlicate .,1.1.~ ad::'I1:=; .lot'& h1.oclc nmber,.J..e;Jal. description l<Ihel::e
awcqn:iate)' .
3) Present Zonin:J
R-6
4) Iotsize 10,760 sq.ft.
5) .l\fplicarrt:'s Name, 1\ddresS & Ebooe if Schermer
3990 Cuervo 'Avenue. Santa Barbara. CA 93108
805-569-3151
6) '~'- s_s.lo.tive's Name, M3:cess ~ B:looe f
Doug Graybeal 303-925-2867
Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects Ltd., 510 East Hyman Avenue. Aspen. CO ~1611
7) Type of 1IppJ ic;,ti.a1 (please cbeck all that awlY) :
_ stream. M3rgin
Final roo
'~~~~-
_ F.inal,Histaric ~-
Min:>r Historic ~.
Hi,staric ]')ennlition
~:.....---,~ Des' tion"
_ "'-""<.uL..... __Jgna:
,--- ~ Allobrent
- GMjS Exellption .
_' <::xnlitiqnal'Use . _ 0:n:leptDal. SPA
_ SJ:-"'i",' Review Final. SPA
_ 8040 GJ:eenline ~ 0:n:leptDal. roo
"
_ M::.untain yiew Plane ~ ~v.ision
Corrlalliniumiztion _ ~ ~
_ ~. Splif/Iot Line,
Mju"lu=tt
X Hallam Lake Review
8) IJescripticn of Elci:st.inJ Uses (r-mher ard qpe of eld.sI:in.J. st:ruc:bI:!:'es;
~ sq. ft.; rnnh>>::, of bo:ilive..us;, any pr:ev:i..als appro<ra1s gxanted fu the
p~)" .
One existing single family residence. approximately 1.500 sq. ft.. no qaraqe.
or driveway. Historic Designation July 14. 1980 (previouslv deiqned).
November 14, 1990 final approval granted for improvements not built.
(See attached information)
9) Description of De<relcprent .l\fplicaticn
Owner wishes to renovate the existinq buildinq. add a basement. add' on
to residence. and use as a duplex residence,.
~O) Have y= attached the foll=ing?
Response to Att:a<::hment, 2, Mi.niJwm sllhni=ion Oxrt:ents
Resflodse to Atta<::::l:l:m8nt 3, SJ?E'<'if'ic Snhnk<;ion Corrt:ents
_ Response to At:t:actnnent 'I, Review s:tarrlaJ:ds for Yoor lIWlication
-~._. .
.. -~
~
.~,
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE,
Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects Ltd.
(hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for
Schermer Residence 210 Lake Avenue, Aspen, Colorado
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance
No. 44 (Series of 1991) establishes a fee structure for Planning Office applications
and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination
of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or
scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full
extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and
CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT
to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to
be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be
benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments
upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred.
CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full
costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for
CITY staff to complete processing ,or present sufficient information to the
Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission
and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless
current billings are paid in full prior to decision.
!';,
,
. .t
" IMPORTANT
Three, sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than
11 ~x17:'. OR one dozen sets of blueprints 'may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x17" format. '
., ~ . . .
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
ZONE DISTRICT:
LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET):
EXISTING FAR:
ALLOWABLE FAR:
PROPOSED FAR:
Schermer
,
210 Lake Avenue'
R:l6':',
10.760 SF
2,208 SF
4,186 SF
Approximatelv 4.150 SF
EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): NA
PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): NA',
EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 16%
PROPOSED % QF SITE COVERAGE: 24%
EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): NA
Pf'\OPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer,): NA
Z@% JJl~.
EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT:
PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT:
PTindpaIBId9:25 Mid Point
PTindoalBldq:25 Mid Point
I AcceSSOl)' Bldo: 21 f t &, 12 f t
I AccessorvBld9: None
PROPOSED%OFDEMOLlTION: 25 % including r-ear.sJ:ied,:2l%nwithout rear shed
EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: ,
PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 5
EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: None
ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 5 ( 4 proposed)"
SETBACKS:
EXISTING:
Front:
Rear:
Side:
Combined FronURear:
2S
44'
l'i 'i &74
69
ALLOWABLE:
Front: 15
Rear: 1 <;
Side: ] 'i
Combined FrURr~ & 37
PROPOSED:
Front:
Rear.
Side:
Combined FronURear:
l'i
?,
11\',1', lq
37
EXISTING NONCONFORMITIESI Fence over 'proprertv 1 ineR ~nd "axi 1 ary
ENCROACHMENTS: ... l'l11i1 ~;ng ; C! n11Pl'" p,..npp,..ry 1 ;np ::::!nrl pn,.,..n:::!f"'hoco
, into rear yard setback '
VARIATIONS REQUESTEO (eligible for Landmarks Onlv: characler comoatibilitv findino must be made bv HPC1:
FAR:
SETBACKS: Front:
Rear:
Side: *
Combined FrlJRr:
Minimum Distance 8elween Buildings:
6~~n~~:(~mmerdal): Pr~~pess:' t!ban -C;",'
Height (Cottage Infill Only):
Sile Coverage (Cottage Inlill Only):
*below grade egress stair encroachment
,
.
~
,,",,,,
~c~ /l"tL\
U if
.'
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM
state Site Number:
Photo Information:
Local Site Number:
210.LA
ASP-K-30 & 31
Township 10 South Range
USGS Quad Name Aspen
85 West Section
Year 1960
12
x
7.5'
15'
Building or structure
Full Street Address:
Legal Description:
Jessie & Cordelia Waters House
210 Lake Avenue
Lots 21 & 22. Block 103
Hallam's Addition to the city of Aspen
City Aspen County Pitkin
Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End
Owner: Private/state/Federal Private / Nancy Oliphant
Owner's Mailing Address: 210 Lake Avenue. Aspen. CO 81611
Name:
ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION
Building Type: Residential
Architectural Style: Cross Gabled Miner's Cottaqe with rear addition
Dimensions: L: x W: = Square Feet:
Number of stories: 1 and 2 stories
Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irreqular
Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Some trees, one native
deciduous. northwest corner; wrouqht iron fence around yard
Associated Buildings,
Function (map number /
property line
Features or Objects Describe Material and
name): 2 historic small wood sheds at rear,
For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in
the description as appropriate:
Roof: Cross qable, rear shed. standinq seam, corruqated type metal
Walls: Horizontal wood lap sidinq, clapboard
Foundation / Basement:
Concrete
Chimney(s) :
None
Windows:
One-over-one double-hunq, some replacement
Doors:
1/2 liqht over wood panel; none oriqinal
,Porches: Wrap around front, front shed with turned posts and
balusters, cut out brackets
General Architectural Description: Miner's cottaqe with dominant
front facinq crable, decorative trim at porch and qable ends. hipped
side additions and bav (rear).
..
K.
1"""\
Page 2 of 2
State site Number
Local site Number 210.LA
FUNCTION
Current Use:
Original Use:
Intermediate Use:
Residential
Residential
Residential
ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY
Architect: Unknown
Builder: Unknown
Construction Date:. 1889
Actual X Estimate Assessor
Based On:
MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS
Minor ___ Moderate ___ Major
Describe Modifications and Date:
doors. additions; dates unknown
-K-- Moyed ____ Date
Replacement materials. windows,
Additions and Date: Minimum of 4 modest additions to residence (dates
unknown). enclosed porch
NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA
Is listed on ___ National Register; state
Is eligible for ___ National Register; state
Meets National Register criteria: ABC
Register
Register
D E
Map
~
Local Rating and Landmark Designation
I I
I-I
Significant: Listed on or
contributing: Resource
architectural integrity.
supporting: Origi,nal integrity lost due to alterations,
howeyer, is "retrievable" with substantial effort.
Locally Designated Landmark
Justify Assessment; Inteqrity has been compromised due to substantial
modifications
n
is eligible for National Register
has maintained historic or
o
Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The siqnificance of
this residential strucaure is not of those who owned it or lived in it.
nor of its architecture. althouqh this strucaure is representative of
Aspen's mininq era. It is of historical importance by illustratinq the
family/home environment and lifestyles of the average citizen of Aspen
which was then dominated by the silver mininq industrv.
Other Recording Information
Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin Countv Court-
house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps
Archaeological Potential: -H- (Y or N) Justify:
Recorded By: John Sweeney, Intern Date: Auqust 21. 1990
Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preseryation Committee - City of Aspen
Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner
"
'. . "Q\w>O ,CULTURAl RESOURCE nVEY
/ti '
~"
~,
,~
~~.: .,:;,... _ ',';;."'1:,~..$"'~'~ .t::/j,:;..~ '~,::~~~~'~':~;"~;~f:~~.~--.~a.f,~
. ...- I'~',,~."{."-rn..""~.'\' ....~C;i.~f:.~.~ervation Offic~
1300 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203
, ,
ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORICAL COMPONENT FORM
IMPORTANT: USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GREEN INVENTORY RECORD FORM FOR
, FOR RECORDING HISTORIC STRUCTURES AND DISTRICTS. USE SEPARATELY FOR
RECORDING STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES.
1) Resource No. 5PT-l16 2) Temp No. 91
4} Addresa 210 Lake Avenue
3) Name JESSIE/CORDELIA WATERS House
.$1 District Name HalJam rake HiSToric District
I. INTEGRITY: 5} Condition: Good -=-- Fair
7} Original Use Residential
. Deteriorated
8} Present Use, Residential
91 Original Site f< Moved _ Date{s}, ef Mave~ N/A
10} Unaltered _ Altered ~ Explain~ oPi gin;ll lY'1'Y'h hi'l'" hppn C'hi'lngpti
II. ,DESCRIPTION; 111 Building Materials Wood
121 ,Construcdon Date circa 1889
131 ArcnitectrBuilder unknOwn
. ""'~'.
14} Architectural Style(s}
Victorian
15) Special Features/Surrounding,s: N/A
'.';~: :'t>.;,<.,.~t).
...,...,......:;..,".
,"'," ',,~ .';' :,",.. '. .
...,......"....
.;.....,:."..
.'~ ....... .":,'..';'
.' , . - .
.:.).-,.-'.':~-,;_:,:j,::,_~;:!..<-,:~:, ;.~o;.~;::;;..:::' . . ..".. ""'~'."",:" .
<7l~~,~~'!i.Ol0g_~ca.l."~.Q!:enti..l: .,Yes_,~ef;i" ,'UnKnown ,', * ',Ilxl'lai'tl~
"'.., .,-..,.,
"c;~:''':~;''':._
'1~-"
11:1:' CULTURAL ACTIVITlES:
~:",",1N~
,Key the resource type, (ie: house, barn; shed, school, church, etc)
to the cultural activity theme and sub-theme category ,associated
with it.
17)
,18)
Residential
Urban'
'19 TYPES
Sin
. ":fji~.,
Frame Number,
Roll Number
Facade Orientation Frn~~
"', .~ ',.-- :~.~'~~~~~:~~~..:. .~:
ssess w ~f~er o:;'ncii'the,resou;c~"ha~'~ny historical or architectural
merit by checking appropriate categories and iustifyin~ below. Include
any re~evant historical data.
21) Historical Significance:
20) Architectural Significance:
Associated with significant persons
Represents work of, a master - Associated with' significant events or
- Possess'es high artistic values
* Represents a type. period. or * ~~~~~:tes to the significance of an
- method of construction - historic district
IV.
.....,...'.;:...,.."
,. ,':'''~'.
The 13ignificanceofvthis residential strllC1:u:re is not of those who owned it ,or livedm
, it,'noI' of itsaI'Cbitectu:re, although it is representative of Aspen's mining era;. ,It' is
of hisi:oricalimportance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle(s)
of the;average cit.iz~inAspen which was then dom:inated by the silver mining industry.
"::;',"
...' ~)..
22) List Any Associated Cultural Group:
V. REFERENCES:
none
" .
, '
Pitkin County Cour>i:house records
:REcgRDER' V. G. Kir>kpatrick
,.., ,'i>~:'..
" ,',.'
,,:,;~~~*~~;~7.;;~:~:;'::~:::\t;~:,.:'i:',
DATE
Sept. 30, lqRO
\.1, '.
I .', .
I
/
^
ASPEN HISTORIC SITES/STRUCTURES INVENTORY
1980
i03/2IJ22-
BLOCK/LOT(s)
2. to 'LA~ .A')fE:.
ADDRESS
GRANTEE
YEAR/TAX ASSESSMENT
RESOURCES: 1. Pitkin County'Abstract of Lots Books
Grantor/Grantee Books
Grantee/Grantor Books
2; Pitkin County Tax Assessment Rolls (on microfilm)
RESEARCHER:~ (.;. klQ~AIR..1C-lL-- ~'. I W
CONCLUSIONS:
'1
I
I
I
:
J
I,
i'
I'
r'
I,
I,
I,
I,
i.
l.
; ,
I'
I,
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
,
I
i
I
I
I
I
!
r-'j
.-.
HOLLAND & HART
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
DENVER
DENVER TECH CENTER
COLORADO SPRINGS
ASPEN
BIlliNGS
BOISE
CHEYENNE
JACKSON
WASHINGTON, D,C
600 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611.1953
TELEPHONE (303) 925-3476
FACSIMILE (303) 925,9367
December 30, 1992
ARTIlUR C DAILY
Doug Graybeal
Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects
510 E. Hyman Ayenue
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Lot 19. Block 103. Hallam's Addition to the city and
Townsite of Aspen
Dear Doug:
Record title to the captioned property is presently held as
follows:
Lloyd G. Schermer and Betty A. Schermer, as
life tenants until the death of the surviyor
of them, as joint tenants with right of
surYivorship, and Gregory P. Schermer and
Grant E. Schemer, remaindermen, each as to an
undiyided one-half interest.
ACD/caf
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Lloyd G. Schermer
r-.
."\
3990 Cuervo Ave.
Santa Barbara, CA 93108
January 2, 1993
City of Aspen Planning Office
City Hall
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter authorizes Doug Graybeal of Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects, LId, to
act as representative for our properly at 210 Lake Avenue, also known as Lot
19 Block 13; Hallam's Addition, Aspen, Colorado, before the Historic
Preservation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
SiW:erely,
~~
Betty a11d LLoyd Schermer
,/\
1"""'\
9450 Grant Creek Rd.
Missoula; MT 59802
January 2, 1993
City of Aspen Planning Office
City Hall
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter authorizes Doug Graybeal of Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects, Ltd. to
act as representative for our property at 210 Lake Avenue, also known as Lot
19 Block 13; Hallam's Addition, Aspen, Colorado, before the Historic
PreseNation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Sincerely,
)JIJf-~
Grant E, Schermer
"
(----:-,
,~,
~'
."""
-
3090 Lundy Lane
Betteridoii, IA 52722
January 2, 1993
City of Aspen Planning Office
City Hall
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter authorizes Doug Graybeal of Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects, Ltd. to
act as representative for our property at 210 Lake Avenue, also known as Lot
19 Block 13; Hallam'sAddition, Aspen, Colorado, before the Historic
PreseNation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
1'Y
Gre"~~
.
,
,
.,-...
.-..
."...-.
,
." ~.;
.... ~
lioox392 ~t{ !~r->R "... '
~':;.'
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING I\S AN HISTORIC STRUCTURE AND SITE THE
--LOCATION OF THE OLIPHANT RESIDENCE CONSISTING OF LOT 19, BLOCK
103, ImLLAM ADDITION
WHEREAS, subsequent to receiving affirmative recownendations
from the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee, the City Council
has 'detr;rmined that the designation of the Oliphant Residence as
an historic site is appropriate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAmED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
See ticn 1
That the follo'iodng described area and structures thereon are
hereby designated as an H, Historic Overlay District, pursuant to
the provision,S of Article 9 of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal
Code,
Lot 19, Block 103
Hallam Addition to the City of Aspen
Section 2
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or por-
ticn of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconsti-
tutional by any court of cOlnpetent juriSdiction, such portion
shall be deemed a separate, distinct anq independent provision anu
such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining por-
tions thereof.
Section 3
A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the /';"~J,_I
day of U,...tt.J........ , 1980, at 5:00 P.M. in the
.Ii /I
City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, COlorado, fifteen
days prior to which hearing public notice of the same shall be
~.~, ~ "!~~~~~!"J'-:l~~?..f11!f~~.~~~~~lit'''''''m,~..~!il~~!..,.,.,~,,~. '.,1'...,," '~."'f') ;, ;
.-''". 'd.... '''',
.~...,.~"." .,.*"" ~"..--..".,...,,_.~.. "....
('.
,....,\
"
.11I'....-
l...r "~;;I; ":',~l:'ilj~'" ~>r\f~ ~'..' '.';'~::'! f'" ':': 0:, .:,.;0 .i~::.',
" \ ,J~:IIl~.~lltIl\' ......n' ..._,....... ..,,,,,,.. '!LA
':,:ff~':"-}~fl"",":,:~~~':~:~fi;~;'~~f!.Jttt~~~',t'*':if;~~~;'.':j:~~'.t ,l:
:;',.',
III1"llOOiIC1!O, III!AII t..olD CfU)I!lleD !'Vb1 bhed 40 ptOV idO<l by lau by
;>-,
lOoetlllg held Oil the ,...:'")
the City COuncil ot the City of ^epell, Colotado, at Ite togular
9'~-'
~~
Her~
day of
, 1980.
,""
" "f:
...~..[ \". I,$p.....
,/ t:.A'TTEST':.' I~~.\.
/ . .. \.
Mayor
FINALLY adopted,
o
passed and approved on the
/'dqiAJ
7 day of
, 1980.
:#~~I
Herman Eeel ,-
Mayor
. '.:,F .J l' ~
:.;A>rTEsi,' i,
,,' '.'
:,.~,:,.,,~ '
. ~.~, ,'. ,( .", 1.-" .
~atl1,1;"Yn:"~
d!;:t',Gl.~rR
d~/
'.
2
\"
>l!.__.....
~,...".._~-,.. "..\
!~
~-
.'
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
.
CITY OF ASPEN
130 SOU H
General
Construction
Permit
1
T GALENA STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ' 344-79 ::;;
(303) 925,2020 0
~":: -I
AppUcant to complete numbered spaces only. ",:t::I:
JOB ADORESS ",.-. , i;!m(j;
210 Lake Avenue ",Z."
;;1<0
LEGAL. I LOT NO. ISLOC~ 03 I rRACT OR sueDIVISION (U SEE A TT ACHED SHEET) , 0)> :lJ
" OESCR, '19 ::;;!:s
-0-
OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP ~~~:Trh ~)>rn
2, Nancv Ollohant Box 88~4 81611 0-1)>
C:m"
CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. -lOm
."
3, th.. l I.lD~ "':t::lJ
ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER PHONE ~ms
MAIL ADDRESS LICENSE NO. -:lJ ::j
4, :':1m
se If ::;; 0
- Z
ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. r-
r- r
5, , '" -<
'"
USE OF BUILDING 0
6, slnQle familv dwellinQ 0
[ii
Class of work: oNEW '" ADDITION o ALTERATION ~REPAIR o MOVE o WRECK r-
7, '"
8. Change of use from m
,
PLAN CHECK FEE V ALIDA TION
Change of use to $28.00
PERMIT FEE P D , $ 28 ;0 0 8!1 57 9# 3 7 5 9
9. Valuation of work: $ 11,000 56.00 'Prb I~~ q/~s,7t-=4J "S.9Sf
10, REMARKS: 5 i d i nQ. roof. underoinnina TOTAL FEE
-f-04l-n.da-t-I-Q Rpnl""inn n,,~t of hl.ln $84.00
WATER TAP FEE
r""J: of hou~.. r..ol"cinn n^~nh In 'D~' ,
,
~Dnl~"lnn nn~"h In f~nnt " ~nnf Tyl)ll 01 Construellon Occupancy Group Olvlslon
,
BUILDING TO CONFORM TO BLDG.,ELEC., Size of Bulldln\! No. of Stories Max,Oec.Ll>>:d
--, (Tot!!1 SCluare Ft.)
PLUI1BING & INSULATION CODES.
In~n.."rion ~Dn,,'rD<i nf 1',,- ~ _ ""," 1 1 FI'e Zone Use Zone Fire Sprl"l<lers I'uqulred
~ in~"l r'on 1'1.." " nl,-'-'-- _nn~ per DYes C No
to ob ta in m i to
-,\PPLtCATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKEO APPR~VEf F~ ISSUANCe
" No. 01 Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKlNO 'PACT
"AIJ ____ sv L./ i/ 1"""... Covered Uncovered
BV SV
I I ;/"'/ h OJ
DATE DATE DATE Special Approvals REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE
, NOTICE Rill'. ,,{/!r"ov,,1 tt-{jtJ,r-,~ -,
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REOliiRED FOR EL TRICAL, PL MBI~ l ZONING
HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. HEALTH DEPT.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION FIRE DEPT.
AUTHORIZED IS NOTCQMMENCEO WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUC.
TlON OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 SOIL REPORT
DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK ISCOMMENj:EO,
I HEnF..BY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION PARK DEOICATION
ANO KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROV'SIONS OF LAWS
"'.ND ORDINANCES GOVERNING nllS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WATER TAP
WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT ENG.DEPT.
PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF
ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PEA. OTl-tER (SPECIFY)
FORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Plans att ched.
"ONJ.7~:;((f);;;z:;r (DAlE)
,5P./lt ~S 7'1
SIGNATURE or-a.. I R UILOER DATE
WHIHL;;NSPECT~S COPY f ,
YELLOW - ASSESSOR'S COPY PINK - BUILDING DEPARTMENT FILE GOLO - CUSTOMER'S COP
Y
~
Q.t
O'z
t'I
.,;.
\C\
.>
5 :lI.
N
.)
s.,
'sb'u
a'hl
r;
SL'
.,
,........,
,
'"
rl
b'S
<.
H?'clOd(Yl()t-I
o
~
~, .
, \\1
..... .1. i,<
, :!j~i
j;l,
.1 ::
....r
,r"\
,
"
"
i
I
, J
\ I
, ,
:~ i
"
"
)
1
!
z
'... -
...",
...
...'-
'" o.
;p
'"
...
:'
o
\." 6!'l,OO I
LAKE
5.9'
r"\
17,75'
'"
...
9.95'
ONE STORY
FRAME ~OUSE
;::;
'"
FENCE
14,8
AVENUE
"
5,S'
~
"'.
i '
rt
""
I
\
I;
"
\
'"
'"
3. '
'"
R,.40l.20'
"
.
I""',
y,'
1""'"
. ',-..-...
.I. HAROLD W. JOHNSON, (JOHNSON-LONGFELLOW 6 ASSOCIATES, INc.l A
REGISTERED SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORAQO, 00 HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT ONl!IE 29TH DAY OF JUt~E. 1979, A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
SllPERVl510U Of LOT 19 BLOCK I03UALLAM'S ADDITION AS SHOWN ON
.H1ENOEO SHEET 3 SHAW, 'N. P. W. SUB. EXEMPTION PLAT SHOWN tlEREON
AND THE IMPROVEMENTS WERE FOUND TO BE AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAf.
ALL -EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME ARE
SHOWN. SAID SURVEY IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
JOHNSON-LONGFELLOW a ASSOCIATES, INC.
ey: "'~?~;;;:~_l!!{/4 -l 0-L---..-
HAROLD W. JOHN~6N'. LS. 9018
:"'.
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY
LOT 19 BLOCK 103 HALLAM'S ADD.
AS SHOWN ON AMENDED SHEET 3
SHAW, W. Po W. SUB, EXEMPTION PLAT
JOHNSON~LONGFELLOW a ASSOCIATES, INC.
BOX !S5.47. SNOWMASS VILLAGE, COLORADO BI615
JOB NO. 90-170 SCALE: I " 10
JULY 13,1979 I('W.J.~G.R.H.
",
~,f;*c~,~~~~~~gJ~~;~~;::~C;~~~~~~8'ICbl,~h:~~;k~3~;i;g~~7g~*f6~Y..
!, J ,) 3:~.~~;;t~~~~~t.'.;1.~ ~~:~:.~.'N~,"~:', ,: .. '.::...:'.'" .", .~:~~l;~E'~:~~I.f~~'~":. " :'.~. ,:. .
f,:," :'.;"':::':~~::::::::::"."C,":"::-",~':::=-7."';"~''':.-:-::-: REG.lONAL'"BU.lLOING .OEFJARTMENT
. .. ',' .. . '. ~
..;~~:: :,'.::. :~'~~:~"';.::'';:.7;~;;~:~~~,:::'~-'. ':.~. , ... ..:...:..': .. '" . . . .....;. .;.. ,.
"':"""':'" ..,_.-....,_"__,.~... ...... ...,u, "JurlSClctlon of, ,-"" ~ .....
\..:.:.:,':'i1~PI;';''';~u ~~;':;~~~~../;~t(:'~I~,';r"i','~~':',,~,;, ~;",';'~:'II~ ;;:,:..~}:..,":" "" ... . ''',". -::.-. ~,.:::".' . '. . . "". . . .. "..
"~~.~~:,i:i::"~"!""~:'''~::'':'.:.~':~~~_J~:;: I~'~-'~~"- ~._~~_n:. '.::'~""".".' ,_ '" :: '~'_.,:'.'. ~'~",,"" '~" .~~:~,.-?:,~
,: ~i _~: S,,::~~O~~::i:~:::;ri;'-;;r.,;~:.:::~,:~:': :,::.;';\;::.:.:,:,~,,':~;', ';,:~', ',. ,:;, c,:,:::,~,: ; ':".:',:;I'~::;;,;: ;~8':'::":" .. t;';-,::,.,:':::E:~
l:"~~;~~~~:;:i:;:~;;.::. ;;~.t'l7:.t~~~ }:~~9T5~,~~tJ:',~;:~:ri,~~~;~,:S;;3;:~l:,~'~:;:;':':::~~,;::~'~:~;;,\ I:~I:"~.'/: ;~. :~~ .,,/'~;t ~:i~::~~;
2,. r~~NY~ :.::'); _,.' '." ,n :', ~IO ,Ll\K,~, ..:n~~:" ..:~16_ ',q2).-JM<.',<,
;'/~-. ~'~~~~~~l{i~:':tl~~f=~~~~i:;;~t;~\~~~~~~~~~il~~~~~.f~~i"
~.HC" ... C" (:.; C!~ ~,:~.....~.r.
'.,'
,::....:
".,'
~;~i~;~~~f;;~f~i~~JZ~f~~~E;{:7i~,i~~~tii;;;,i~~\;Jit!:i~~4~i
6; ~~;:~~~~;}1t~:,+bt>~:'(~ ~:'~~;~~ '_: -~i]~':~'~iJrl~:f]i~F~;;~~<~~.~:~:,;t;:~;:~~:~:;.::j.i'f~~~'i:2t";~,,
8: Ch~~_~~::?f1~':'f;~~::iff~~~~~~~?~;'~>'.)~~ "j' '~,~_. ..', ~,'
. . . ,
TIiIS FORM'!S AI'.ERM IT ON LX,'NH ~'N V ALIIJA-'r'eD ~:;,1,
"OIilQl1,RSj'AB'f.~WJtifQY7; PERMir.wlc!:'f[:'toififfEf~~RE'iF:~' ..
D ' ~:~~;;--:~i,'lO~4. ""
,,- ...:~. WH~TE - INSP.~CTOR'S COPY" /YELLOW "::.c"ASSESSOR'S COPy., -.:: Pl't\1K '-:_ BUtL~INGDEPA-RTME~T FILE' '.- - Go'LO-~'CUSTOMER;S,-COPY ~:<':'f~.<:':~':~,;;,;,;;~
,'.....,....:...~._,; ,,'~_. .' ''',',':,.._., ..,."."",j.o,. ":":;~~
....,1.
4,
.J... .'.'
--./.., ..
"
':..~:~~E9.;:i~E~~~~;3:{g~:1.S~]\t~l':~~i,~~!}i],:~:~-~;~"<~<:;~~<S;~:~;~~:~~~I;~~'"";'~'0
9~:X~i~~~!J;i~~~;.~~~f~:.~:~~V61;.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~f,~I~!~~t~h1tt;it~ '
,-'
,
10.:aEM"aKS:::
'!f::<;:;7i~'#1~.~~i:~ 'i ,:~.l,_'
, ":....
,
....
\
-'}
.Il,PPl:tCA:Tl.9.~ ACCEPTEO
~,-:".:_,F;; 't-,_."." -:..-"
..' ,"
'" PLANS CHECKED,! I
' ~ ;'!",..~? ,-t,...; /
'~U" /.I,
BY ')'~;,[,J ' RU,h
OATE:~::-:': .:/:..~ !,
APP~vr^FQJtISSu'ANC~
~ r-N,~,l--,,'
. Byr"./.I.~.?ltJ,~.t,/1;q
::.;.-hJt.jllrl-:';
DATE < ..... -..,r'
,
BV
OATe'
"
'f
,
,
. '. NOTICE
SEPARATE PERMITS ARE "REO"'D'i"FiEDFOR- eLeCTRICAL, .PLUMB)NG/
HEATING, VENTILATING oa AIR CONOITIONING, . ~__,. .
THIS PERMrt-sECOMES, NULt AND VOID-IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION':'
'AUTHORIZED 15 NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUC"
l~ TION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120,:::'
DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK ISCOMMEN.CED." . -. .
I 'HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINEO-THIS:-APPLICATION '".
AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS...
AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPUE'O WITH .
WHETHER SPECIFIEO HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT,OOES NOT"
PRESUME:.TO GIVE_AUTHORITY TO '(IOL.ATE OR CANCEt THE PROVISIONS OF.
ANY OTHER STATE'OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- .
FORr;~,~~,~,',',_'~,',"~",,:,_",,~"..~,~,..~~.~~~.:JION. '. .,. '. >'..~~":0. ,_:~..~~.:.~::2.JL~!~:~.{::'
..,'_... _--'_"___ :".":;:;;: '- :j.;;__>""'~~';' '~~'_~~." .-","_'IT" .~,.,.":::",,~~~~;. ::.,'
"71;~~1;;,'~A~~;4~~ 2) A;:tZEO A:~~~ ' :,::)~A:,E~"'f " '~
:. Ja;<-::"_7.l;:,.<:o >"L ,,: --q>""c'QJ 0' .
IGNAT RE F OWN IF OWNER UILDER
:'-(J! :~:; --/~~ - -~- ./-_.:.~ - '<
~.,:PERMl'rv-;;;LII;ATioi,t;,:CK:'~< M,o: .e:.--:C;"sH 0,
,_.."..."'.....,.,,.
:."\::"
: ....:.,.:.{
L.t:'_....~,. :\,0
..J~,
," ~ .;"".,
. i~;;~;~:, f ;.: '.:~.:
:~:~..~:';:~;~'~,~;I:~,t-~,~.;.~,~,:~~,.
..... :-:- .
~~:tt'l'i~~#.,~l;~:t";;a~~~~
,:., . '~- , .. ';,.::': ~': :.
1'..\l1,~",,~~~~i
'~.' ~~ r~"
~,~.._,.. "~':,:~.fP_"':~..,'_c~'
::',.;..~.ri;;.:..:.{"';n-,>,','<'G".~..._~ '~..
'\ ~ ~':.,,;.:.: .:>~::<:~;;::H~l ,~S:,
.-;' ~'~"I;'~~ ~f
n___ ._____
"01
....
."d.
"".<;~~:,: ;'i:} .~':~;.. :.. .'
I
. !--------. .
. "la,"..
! 1<'- e.
r.ll'i'::...
.,:;."
." , ..~ .( ."\: :; ~. ...... ~ .~,
:,.., '''.~.~ ;,..~:...~R.: .,. ..~
'. ::.'; < J
, I ',',.,
''':''''~~~~~:--::-:.': :::,,1'(:
. '..,:
:~IJ:r:':"
>.
.........,
,.. ...\
,.-::-..,
:r.-.-". ."1''-'
.':.......:!
______ ,M-,,_i '
Special A~prova,;.i - .".'-~-EQUIRED!'
'~~:'3:~~:2;bA-TE
",~~"i._.~'~'"
",.:<~~."
AUTHORIZED BY
ZONIN~ _ _.:....~..
HEALtH OEPT:
~;;".\
."n:",,:"
:f;i~~~.~
,,,,,,,,,,--'
.'
..,.,-,.,.<.'"
,:t:~?D
A4'
FIRE DEPT.
".:<-'..- .>-
-oj.-.,.
SOIL REPORT_ ..., .
"::;-.;:--..,..,~..';:;:::;;;:;;;:-
PARK DEDICATION
:~',;~~;;:<~:'~;i~'h~
WATERTf.P
E~G; DEf'~-:~ ..
".':-
i:f~~:'"
,. ".., .
. , --,.
~__"'_w__. _
-.,,'..,
O.THER (SPE,C,~FY)
,.:-t '"., i".Ie
':::0fP'~,::, 7,"1...";
;/,
""t1i';
,
\,'.' ,
. "'-/. ~
"~,,,
T ..~.:_,~.._,..____.. ,"
PLAN CHECK VALIDATION.
c
(
i
"
.
,,-,
,r"
Historic Preservation Committee
Minutes of Nov. 14, 1990
210 LAKE AVENUE - FINAL DEVELOPMENT
Roxanne: We have found that the applicant has met
conditions that were put upon the conceptual
application that was previously granted. We are
that HPC approve the application which shall be met
by Staff prior to the issuance of a Building Permit:
Restudy use of metal roofing' with the goal of re-
roofing with wood shingle, stained dark.
all of the
deyelopment
recommending
and approved
Submit a basic preservation plan for remaining original
elements and materials of the historic cottage. '
Bracken Raleigh, architect: We propose to take off the sun room
area and extend the porch out. In further study of the roof
there is a ten inch differential that was found and I reapplied
the back of the building to what was the front of the building so
that is indicated on the different elevations throughout the
house. The rest of the p'lan is' the same and I modified the
windows in the back to allow for interior centering of windows
and to allow a transition around the corner in the back. There
are two new windows since the Board last looked at the plans.
The sloped area has now been leveled off and the deck extended.
We plan to match the existing roofing and I will study a wood
roof but the existing building is 2 by 6's that are awfully old
to be thinking about having four feet of snow sitting on top of
them., The roof was put on as it was leaking.
Les: The only neighborhood comments were about the deck.
Bracken: At conceptual we did agree to make it a solid railing
around the deck if that was deemed necessary by the Board with a
baluster look. That will create privacy between Nicholson and
Nancy.
Roger: I am fine with the proposal.
Don: On the south you show deck that has a solid railing?
Bracken: That is not solid and will not be altered at all.
MOTION:Les made the motion that the HPC grant final development,
approval for 210 Lake Avenue subject to the following condition
which shall be met and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of
a Building Permit: A basic preservation plan shall be submitted
for remaining original elements and materials of the historic
2
... ~ l. .
r"\
~
(
Historic Preservation Committee
Minutes of Nov. 14, 1990
cottage; second by Charles.
carries.
All in favor of motion, motion
824 E.COOPER - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT - PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Bill poss opened t~e public hearing.
Barbara Long & Ken Moore are the architects for the project.
Roxanne Eflin presented the over-view of the project as attached
in records (see memo dated October 24, 1990). 'We are
recommending that HPC g'rant conceptual approval subject ,to ,the
following condition to be met at final:
A representation of major building materials shall be
presented at the meeting, with a complete narrative
included in the Final Development application.
All original lap siding shall be preserved where
possible on the original portion of the cottage. Only
those sections that have deterior~ted significantly
shall be replaced with duplicate siding material.
(
Barbara: We flipped the building around and moved the
into the front and the forty fives onto the back.
gable is now in the back. We included the chimney
side and I kept the corner on the west side.
bay window
The cross
on the east
Ken: We also brought the 60ttage up one foot and the addition
down one foot which is represented on the model.
Barbara: It was suggested that we add our transom window back in
but we would prefer diagram 3A; larger windows which really make
the addition different from the cottage.
CLARIFICATIONS AND COMMITTEE COMMENTS
Charles: It seems like the roof is too thin in terms of' an
actual roof material. Will the roof material be closer to where
the windows are.
Barbara: The inside would but we wanted to keep the outside a
thinner fascia. A thin fascia coming out past the wall to kind
of replicate what was on the cottage.
Charles: I personally feel #3 is a little less fussy.
Georgeann:
building
I
but
think the
I find it
thin fascia works on the original
uncomfortable thought with the
3