HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sr.700 S Galena.1982
"
':,r,', ~.
!""'\
.~
I,.
RONALD GARFIELD fD)~f9~t
ANDREW V. HECHT III 601 E',
SPENCER F. SCHIFFER ',.'APR 13 198asp,1
KATHERINE HENDRICKS
(ADMITTED IN MASSACHUSETTS O~y)ASPEN I PITKIN CO. ,-
. PLANNING OFFl~.!'il 12, 1982
GARfIELD & HECHT
, :'~"
NEYS AT LAW
SQUARE BUILDING
HYMAN AVENUE
OLORADO 81611
TELEPHONE
(303) 925-1936
TELECOPIER
(303) 925-3008
CABLE ADDRESS
"GARHEC"
HAND DELIVERED
Ms. Ali6e Davis
City of Aspen Planning Department
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: 700 South Galena-Final Plat Review
Dear Alice:
I understand that in your memorandum of April 2, 1982 to the
City Council you state that the Subdivision Agreement was
submitted at the "last I)l~nute" and take the position that if it
is found to be inadequate, the Planning Office would recommend
that the final plat be tabled until the April 26, 1982 Council
Meeting.
We strongly object to any tabling of this matter in view of the
very serious time constraints. The reason for the delay in
submitting the Agreement to you was due to a misunderstanding
between Gary Esary and myself. I had been under the impression
that the City was going to prepare the Agreement in view of the
complexity of the approvals and the number of conditions
involved. Indeed, the City prepared the Extention Agreement so
I naturally assumed that they were going to prepare the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement. As soon as we discovered the
mistake, Gary sent me the excerpts of the P&Z meeting, and I
prepared a draft of the proposed agreement.
As you mayor may not know, these agreements are typically
redrafted at least once to accommodate the concerns on both
sides. I would expect that that would be the case here too. In
fact, I think it would be the better practice to wait until
after final plat approval to determine whether or not additional
conditions which may be imposed by the City Council need to be
incorporated in the agreement.
Because of the foregoing I think it is unfair and inappropriate
to recommend that action be tabled pending the approval by the
City Attorney of the final agreement. This is particularly true
in view of the fact that, in any event, the agreement would
probably have to be further modified to accommodate changes in
I""'-.
~
,.
GARFIELD & HECHT
or additions to conditions which might be imposed by the City
Council. Since, in the end it would be the City Attorney and
not the City Council who would determine the adequacy of the
Subdivision Agreement, I don't see any reason why the Council
can't take action on the condition that the final draft of the
agreement be approved by the City Attorney.
I would very much appreciate your reconsidering your position in
light of the foregoing. Thank your for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
Sp
n
F. Sch/iffe
SFS/ew
cc: Gary Esary
Mark Danielson
u
--
--.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Alice Davis, Planning Office
RE: 700 S. Galena Street Project - Final Plat and Subdivision Agreement
DATE: April 12, 1982
The subdivision agreement for the 700 S. Galena Street project is a very
important consideration in the review of the final plat as this agreement ties
up all necessary conditions and required improvements for the project. As
mentioned in the April 2, 1982 Planning Office memorandum, the subdivision
agreement was not submitted in time to allow sufficient review and comment to
be made by the Planning Office, the Attorney's Office and the Engineering
Department so that those comments could be included in the April 2, 1982
memorandum. Therefore, this memo (April 12, 1982) is a review of the 700 S.
Galena subdivision agreement.
After reviewing the applicant's subdivision agreement, the Assistant City
Attorney made several changes in order to obtain an agreement acceptable to
the Planning Office, Engineering Department and the Attorney's Office. This
subdivision agreement is attached for your review.
Council needs to make several decisions regarding items three and four of the
subdivision agreement. Item three requires that the subdivider agree to
provide a guarantee of no less than 100X of the current estimated cost of
improvements as computed by the City Engineer. This guarantee, as currently
stated in the agreement, can be provided in several forms i.e., a cash escrow
with the City or a bank or savings and loan association, an irrevocable sight
draft ora letter of commitment from a financially responsible lender. The
Planning Office and the Assistant City Attorney agree that a cash escrow with
the City would be the most appropriate form as it provides the most assurance
for the City. It is recommended that this method be used to guarantee improvements
for the proposed project.
The Planning and Zoning Commission passed a resolution on March 16, 1982
recommending that Council require a performance bond to insure the timely
completion of the 700 S. Galena Street project and to provide sufficient money
to be available for restoring the site to its original condition should the
applicant fail to meet the completion schedule in the Code or the obligations
conditioned in the project's approval. Item four of the subdivision agreement
mentions this performance bond. Council needs to decide if this performance
completion bond should be required in the final plat approval. The Planning
Office recommends that the performance completion bond be required and that
the necessary amount of the bond be included as part of the guarantee in item
three. It is recommended that the improvements guarantee and the performance
completion bond both be in the form of a cash escrow with the City.
Planning Office Recommendation
The Planning Office recommends final plat approval of the 700 S. Galena Street
project subject to the obligations and conditions found in the subdivision
agreement drawn up by the Assistant City Attorney including a change requiring
that the improvements guarantee and the performance completion bQnd be provided
in the form of a cash escrow with the City.
Council Action
I move to approve the final plat for the 700 S. Galena Street project subject
to the conditions of the subdivision agreement including but not limited to
the following:
1. The improvements guarantee must be in the form of a cash escrow with the
City, providing a guarantee of no less than 100% of the current estimated
cost of improvements. The current estimated cost will be part of a
separate agreement, calculated at a time when all designs are completed
;~
,-
~'
~
,-,
ME:MORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Alice Oavis, Planning'Office
RE: 700 S. Galena - Final Plat
DATE: Apri 1 2, 1982
Location:
Lot Size:
Zoning:
Applicant's
Request:
Engineering
Comments:
.",
Building
Department:
P& Z Action:
Review ~/'j
APPROVED AS TO FORM: 'hf:;;
700 S. Galena Street; Lot 16 and Parcel
Acres Subdivision
21,602 sq. ft.
L-2
The applicant, H.B.C. Investments, is requesting final plat
approval for 16 free market units and 1 employee unit at 700
S. Galena Street. The applicant received prelimina~-Rl.gj
approval on M~r.ch 2, 1982.
The Engineering Department has addressed several items that
are not shown on the plat that should be addressed in the
subdivision agreement. . These items include:
1. A build.io.9-.lLemi t shoul d not be..JssJJed on the project
until sufficient investigation and design of the
temporary and permanent retainina <;truc:tur.es have been
conducted by a geotechnical consultant.
2. If the applicant is to build retaining .structures_in
the City ri qht-of-way. hI' must obtain approval from
the City Council to encroach upon the-rlght-of-way. A
construction easement and a license for any permanent
underground structure will also be necessary.
3. If the desiqn of on-site drai.nag.U.acil5..tjes rf'<;ult.s
in the need for overflow connection tQ.Jhe)s.:t.Oi:JJJ.
sewer, th~ aDD 1 i c..ant. shoul d be re.qu.u:e.d..tn p~tpnd
existing storm sewer .fpcilitip<; IIp Galf'na Street to
City specifications.
4. Holy CrosS Electric Company has confirmed a willingness
to remove the e~i<;ting QYerbead Dower lines to the
benefit of the applicant and other adjacent landowners.
The applicant, as a result, should be required to
provide any f'asements..tha.Lmay bf' n"",,<;<;ary in order
to restore underground seLvice to the area.
5. The Engineering Department has approved two 18 foo~
curb cuts on Galena Street for this project as Galena
is the only point of access. Due to substantial
underground parking and the resulting low impact on
parking in the surrounding area, the Engineering
Department has no problem with this curb-cut variance,
t
.
~
L
~,
~
The Building Department has stated that a hot tub in .the
southeastern corner of the project encroaches upon the
setba.cks. The applicant should remove or relocate_ this hot
tub.
Preliminary Plat Approval: The Planning and Zoning Commission
granted approval to the preliminary plat for the 700 S.
Galena Street project on March 2, 1982 subject to the 6
conditions found in the attached excerpt from the minutes of
Memo: 700 S. Galena. -~naJ Piat Revie\'1
eage Two
April 12, 1982
.--
;".-'
the P & Z meeting. In summary these conditions deal with 1)
slope stabilization, 2) surface and subsurface drainage, 3)
the obHgations of the amended GMP application, 4) preliminc"lry
plat approval does not create any relic"lnce on a subsequent
RBG c"lpplication, 5) c"l construction completion schedule and
6) parking. P & Z also approved the attached resolution
recommending a performance bond be posted by the applicant
to insure the timely completion of the Galena project. The
bond is to provide sufficient money to be available for
restoring the 700 S. Galena'Street site to its original
condition should the applicant fail to meet the completion
schedule Of Section 7-141 of the Municipal Code.
Planning
Office
Review:
The' applicant has worked closely with the ~lanning Office in
order to meet the many concerns that have been raised throughout
the subdivision review process. Several revisions have been
made in order to meet these concerns. The major changes
that have been made as a result of conditional approvals of
P & Z and City Council are as follows:
1. The roof top solar panels which were originally proposed
for this project have been removed since 1) the panels
would have obstructed the view plane from several
nearby properties, 2) the site is an inefficient
location for solc"lr access c"lnd 3) the c"lpplicant has
c"lgreed to provide increc"lsed roof insulc"ltion to maintc"lin
the overall energy efficiency that was originally
proposed.
~\ e.s,
(.orcl\J..L~
o'\'\. ;U,ve-'-.CC;..l'"
,,-~(o\p~~\
t>A-<2t)\O~~.QJi\ '>
v\. (0""
X
2. An' additinne' perking spa,",e was added to the ?6 prnpn~erl
in order to provide the required ~ parking spc"lces --
17 reqlIi red by the Code c"lnd 10 requi red by a fnrm~r
agreement providing parking for the Continental Inn at
the Galena Street site. A new agreement has been
drawn up moving the 10 Continental Inn spaces from the
south end of the Galena property to the underground
parking facility.
3. The entrv ram~'was revised to provide an easier flow
of traffic, c"l pedestrian wc"llk c"lnd a snow-melting
sys tem.' ...c.cC1re-\I\."I -to '<-1"Cl,.'5 rt.L. .
4. The lOCc"ltion nf the ~ite's trash faciJlLty at the
southern end of the property was made according to the
recommendations of the Enqineering Department.
5. Due to the slope, hydrological and geological problems
pr,esent at the subject site, several shori n9. reti'nti on
and hydrological studies have been conducted by geo-
tec.hni,",al engineers i'~d ~pprQ\led by the r:ity'~ F'1ginppring
Department in-9yder to assure the prnj~Gt is appropriately
-? planned and construcigd.' The applicant should c"ldhere
to the techniques approved through these studies.
I
-
6. Problems involving pro.iect construction into utility
easements have been cleared up by requiring that the
c"lpplicc"lnt obtain c"ln agreement with Holy Cross stc"lting
that the existing overhead power lines.will be removed
c"lnd placed underground and that the c"lpplicant will
provide any necessary easements for restoring services
underground. .
<The Planning Office. feels these changes are improvementj:)
resulting from an effective subdivision process. It is
important to assure that c"lll the obligations which the
applicant has ,agreed to throughout the process be carried
out. To insure that these obligations are adhered to,
project plans should be submitted to the Planning Office for
confirmation of their consistency with the approval project
prior 'to the issuance of a building permit.
.
~
~.
Memo: 700 S. Galena - Fihal Plat Review
. Page Three
April 12, 1982
PI anni ng
Office
Recommendation:
>,"'
...
A subdivison agreement was not submitted to the Planning
Office until 9:00 p.m., April 6, 1982. Therefore, the
Attorney's Office, the Planning Office and the Engineering
Department have not yet had a chance to review the agreement.
Section 20-14 of the Code requires that a subdivision agreement
be submitted with the final plat in order to allow the
agreement to be properly referred to and reviewed by the
necessary city departments. Section 20-14 allows each department
a l4-day period for reviewing the subdivision agreement.
The Planning Office is trying to expedite ,the review process
for this application due to the May 1 deadline you have
placed upon this project's obtain.ing a building permit.
Therefore,"we are "attempting to shorten this time period and
hope to have comments regarding the subdivision agreement at
the April 12, 1982 meeting.
Conceptual subdivision approval of this project by P & Z and
Council as well as P & Z's preliminary plat approval were
all subject to several elaborate conditions. These conditions,
along with any required improvements, are to be part of the
subdivision .agreement and are a very. important consideration
in the review of the final plat. . Therefore, if the subdivision
agreement is found to be inadequate the Planning Office will
recommend that the final plat be tabled until the April 26,
1982 Council meeting. If the subdivison agreement is adequate,
it should tie. up all conditions associated with this project
and we will provide you with a brief memo, including the
appropriate motion of approval at that time.
r":
-"""'"
AGE N D A
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 2, 1982 - Tuesday
5:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Regular Meeting
1. COMMISSIONERS I COMMENTS
11. HINUTES
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Cantrup Lodge Complex Rezoning Proposal
B. 700 South Galena ,Street Project - Prelimlnary Plat
IV. ADJOURN MEETING
CIT
,-,.
-
PEN
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 2, 1982
TO: Alice Davis~.
FROM: Gary Esary ~
RE: 700 S. Galena
In your memo of February 25, 1982, on the preliminary
plat public hearing on the above-referenced project, you
include as a condition of approval an engineering
department suggestion regarding certain easements (Page
Four, Item 2).
Attached hereto is a copy of a letter from Spence
Schiffer and a copy of an opinion letter from Cantrup's
title insu~ I've checked this out with Jay Hammond
and he confirms that we're all (engineering, planning,
us and Spence) talking about the same easements. He
also confirms, and I agree, that the letter from Aspen
Title meets our requirements for the disposition of the
easements.
GSE:mc
Attachment
cc: Jay Hammond
"-"::-
0,
,,,,,,",
>
,,-,,
GARfIELD & HEOIT
SPENCER F, SCHIFFER
KATHERINE HENDRICKS
(ADMITTED IN MASSACHUSETTS ONLY)
WILLIAM K, GUEST
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
VICTORIAN SQUARE BUILDING
601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
TELEPHONE
(303) 925-1936
TELECOPIER
(303) 925-3008
CABLE ADDRESS
"GARHEC"
RONALD GARFIELD
, ANDREW V, HECHT
March 1., 1982
Paul Taddune, Esq.
Aspen City Attorney
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: 700 South Galena Street - 925 East Durant Projects
Dear Paul:
In its recommendation to the Planning and Zoning
Commission, the Planning Office has requested as a condition to the
approval for the preliminary plat that "the'applicant must obtain
the necessary easements from the previous property owner in the
areas where project construction encroaches upon these easements."
~
The easements referred to were reserved by the grantor to
the Cantrup's predecessor in title, Luke W. Anthony, Inc. Luke W.
Anthony, Inc. has since conveyed all of its interests in the
adjacent properties and the corporation has been dissolved. The
adjacent properties have been developed, all utilities have been
installed, and Galena Street has since been improved.
Consequently, we do not believe that the easements have any
efficacy whatsoever and would ask for your confirmation of the same
so that the Planning Office can delete that requirement.
I have also enclosed herewith a copy of a letter from
Aspen Title Company dated December 2, 1981 confirming the above.
If you would please deliver a short confirmation of this
to Alice Davis prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
tomorrow evening I would be most appreciative. Thank you for your
cooperation.
Very truly yours,
SFS/pp
Enclosure
GARFIELD & HECHT
/) J4LA,/I
~ ,8
~:c:;.:;z,~--?I iJ..U-- (..(7, ,_ i~
Srfencer F 0 Schiffer ;,;; n
"
,.
"'~
, .
(
"-"ASPJ;~N Tl'.rLI~
. . ~
CO~lPAX1.
^ TITLE l:SSCUA:SCF.: AOl-::SCY
POST OFFICE BOX 9590
ASPEN. COLOnADO 81611
(303) 925-4444
December 2, 1981
To Whom it llay Concern:
On October 1, 1981, Aspen Title Company, Ltd., through ~SLIFE Title Insurance
Company of Dallas issued a Title Corr~itment to June Allen Moss Cantrup con-
cerning the real property as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
,:"",
The commitment under Schedule B, Section 2, Exceptions, 'lt~m 11 refers to
utility easements as set forth in a Deed recorded in Book 206 at Page 444 of
, .
the Pitkin County records. By endorsement dated Dece~ber 1, 1981, saidexcep-
tion was deleted for the following reasons:
The Deed referred to above is dated April 13, 1964 and ;:as recorded the
same day. The Grantor, Luke W. Anthony, Inc" a Colorado Corporation.
conveyed Parcel B on Exhibit "A" to John Harshall Stirling and Rebecca
Birch Stirling reserving an easement for utilities 10 feet in \.;.idth along
the entire Easterly 140 feet of Parcel B, the sac,e being a com':>on boundary
with Tipple Woods Subdivision and an' easement for und.:>rground utilit;ies 20
feet in width running along the Southerly and Southeasterly boun~ary of said
property from the Southerly and Southeasterly line of the road '.;11ich will be
platted and constructed along the boundary of said pro?erty. Examination of
the plat of Anthony Acres Subdivision recorded in PI". t Book 3 a t Page 1~
shows that Parcel B abuts Lot 16, Block 2 of said sut.division, The Easterly
line of Parcel B under the description of the easement reserved t<culd be
subject to a 10 foot eastment and a 20 foot easem.ont. The Southerly line
of Parcel B is th", division line betto/een said parcel and Lot 16 and t.;ou1d
be subject to the 20 foot c.nstment.. The road to he ~l.a:'c~d ~ referred to in
the reservation) is no't" South Galena Street ,...hich abuts the property on the
\.Jesterly side. It was probably intended for the 20 foot easement to read
thnt it tvould run along the Southerly and Southeasterly boundary of said
property. H
.,", ,'f
. .
(
1"'1
,
c
,---.
,.
The plat of Anthony Acres Subdivision was recorded January 4, 1965, the
dedicator being Luke W. Anthony, Inc. Luke H. Anthony, Inc. has since
conveyed to third parties all 'of its interests in Anthony Ac'res Subdivision
and examination of the Pitkin County records shows that said corporation
does not own any property adjacent to said Lot 16 and said Parcel B. We
are informed that no underground utilities were installed in the 10 foot
and 20 foot easements so reserved.
For the foregoing reasons, we and our unden;riter have decided to delete
said easements from our Commitment as it \;Quld be highly unlikely that
Luke H. Anthony, Inc. would install utilities in property in \<hich it
I.) tV.! cl- .
has no interest and which in no way" be of benefit to it.
,<
Very truly yours,
ASPEN TITLE COrWANY, LTD.
00f,~7)l
Bill E. Tom
Vice President
BET /hgy .
Attachment
..
.,.:{t'
).~
",
~
(
,-..
>
EXlI !B IT
"A'l
::~.::.~ .~::.:'
i\TTACilFlJ
1'.'\81,,398
Td
,\:\il ~<..\!,,;.: :\
t~:'.::r
I.E(;,\!. lJ!,:~;c:;.;j 1''1' I,,;:
--,-..-.-.-...... --,. -.-. ~'- '.
l',j)"cc'l A
!.ot J(,
JUDek 2
A:'-JTIIONY ,\Ci:ES SI'WTVTSIO:,
:mda Iso:
P,:u'c(;~l 3
..-,--------...-
A tr<.lct of land situated in the Northt,!(.'st on~-fjun.r::~~
onc-qu;trter of S(~et ion 18) TOt.:nsh.i.p 10 South, ;~':Hl.bi: 3:i
P.H., de,St:r.ih('d as r()llow~i:
0: t:.~
... ._~ -- ...
:':or ti~:':.e.:;t
of the 6th
BEGINNING at a poLnt \.:hcl1C'c- th<i: Z'\orthe-<!st con~~:. of t:~.:!: C..::-tDll1 tract
of l,and deserib.'d .in D...'cc1 l'\.~cor(.led in Jh)\..)!~ 197 .::: ;~~'S~ 5r;.3 :::~.u in Boo~~
198 nt P.:1g~ 110~ b":!:ll'~; !~orth 150301 Et!.~)t: 30.(:0 U~;.::;
thenc\.~ South J)o'JP' H\'~;t 140.00 f~l..~t;
tlwnce t\orth 1:,000' \.!~~;t 11.r.i.!J2 fl'l'l';
tl",nc" North 15'OQ' E",;t 7J.98 fc'vt;
tlwHc-e along tIll' arc ~)f .1 curve tl) t.lll' ;i~~:l~' '..::t;~... .~."::~'"'' ......:~ '.:-~'.CO i,,:....: /
:l dlst.ancl.~ of 39.1)0 feet, the chord of ',':!l.i.l';! i;;.''::.":. ~'~.,):-::;'. ,)~':':~Jt :-:'::$t"
J6.89 reet;
thence ~11(Hl;~ till' :11',' or :1 CU1"\'I..' to tIi" l\'z"~ :.:r~:: ::: :'.:!..::-:..=:"..:- 9.....l. JO f..:-..':
a distanc... of ():!.or, fl.,!.t. th!.... chord ()f '.\':ll:..::l I:..:,:!:'.; ..~):.t~: 7):,,;,,;::-,1 E;~st
()O.SJ f(:c:t;
till.:ncc South 75000' East 115.9/' fL~\'.t: tl\ [b.~ Z\.1:.:,::' .:.~: ~,,:,'{;'::-~:.fnf;w
Both of ahuvr.~ p:lr\'i..'l~; lH.'illg in Pit1;~n CP,:;:t:y. l:l"'1:.J::..:.....
~.
,'-"
March 1, 1982
TO: The Aspen Planning and
Zoning Commission
Mr. Cantrup has not asked nor have we given him, "permission to place the
retention system on (our) adjacent property", as required in the Schnabel
Report, which concerns the tieback system. If Mr. Cantrup does not use tieback
but instead internal rakers, his engineering plans are of no concern to us,
except insofar as you determine they are structurally sound.
However if the recommended tieback system is used, and it is the best system,
it will extend as far as 20 feet into our property. In that event, before
granting permission for tieback right-of-way, we would first require a perform-
ance bond in the amount of $100,000 payable to us in case of damage to our house,
or in the event that Mr. Cantrup does not conform precisely to predetermined
specifications. These specifications should include a stamp of approval by
Schnabel on all engineering work as well as approval by Dr. Charles Robinson,
wromwe have retained as a consulting engineering geologist. He wishes'to inspect
the site at the time that forms are pulled and the tiebacks tightened and before
any structure is built on top or there is fill. Secondly, we respectfully
request a detailed final roof design. Since Mr. Cantrup, for economic reasons,
is using every square inch of his property and it might indeed include required
use of our property for tiebacks, and because we have spent several thousand
dollars investigating this Cantrup Project, we feel that we should be allowed
to consider the architectural plans for the roof which will be approximately 10
feet from our balcony and 5 feet below.
We also believe the retaining wall will affect the natural grade and planting,
and request a right to approve the design of the wall, insofar as it is visible
from our property. .We also believe Mr. Cantrup should provide adequate top soil,....
for landscaping our side of this wall.
Mr. Cantrup's foreman, Mark Danielson, has verbally promised me that HBC has
made arrangements to remove the horrible power pole. We feel this is a plus
in Mr. Cantrup's plans and we are willing to cooperate with him to our mutual
advantage if he constructs the wall in a reasonable time and in strict conformity
with specified and preapproved engineering plans, and as long as he takes into
account our concerns as to roof and wall design.
If these matters are not legally addressed and guaranteed by a performance bond,
we see no reason to grant permission for a tieback system.
Sincerely,
~l^",- ~'\,'-V~'Ul\V\'~
\
Joan Anderman
^
,-,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Alice Davis, Planning Office
RE: 700 S. Galena Street - Preliminary Plat - Public Hearing
DATE: February 25, 1982
Location:
Zoning:
Parcel Size:
Applicant's
Request:
Engineering
Office:
Lot 16 and Parcel B, Block 2, Anthony Acres Subdivision;
700 South Galena Street
L-2
21,602 square feet
The applicant, H. B. C. Investments ,is requesting preliminary
plat approval for the 700 S. Galena Street project as part of
the subdivision process. The applicant received approval for
amendments made to this 1978 resi dential GMP app.l i cati on along
with conceptual subdivision approval from P & Z on December 11,
1981 and from City Council on December 14, 1981. Action on the
prelimina.ry plat has been tabled since January 19, 1982 in
order to allow time to complete and revi.ew the slope, geological
and hydrological studies requested by P & Z and in order to
accommodate adjacent landowners impacted by the development.
After reviewing the revised preliminary plat, making several
stte inspections and reviewing several geotechnical andfounda."
tion reports, the Engi neering Department noted several items
that need to be dealt with before ffna 1 pl at approval. These
items are discussed in the attached memorandum from the
Engineering Department and involve problems wtth utiltty ease-
ments ,. pa.rk ing, slope s tabi.liza ti on anddra i nage. TheSe
problems should be dealt wi.thto the satisfaction of the
Engineering Department prior toobtatning a .building permtt.
Therefore it is recommended that the approval of the 700 S.
Galena Street Project be subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant must obtain the necessary easements from
the previous property owner in the areas where project
construction encroaches upon these easements.
2. In order. to insure slope stabilization the following is
required; .
a. A comprehensive engineering design for both temporary
and permanent earth retaining structures with the
final design reviewed,stgned and sealed by a geo~
technical engineeiand. approved by the Engineering
Office prior to buildi.ng permit issuance.
B. The appli.cant must obtain permission and construction
easements from affected property owners prior to
temporary shorings which extend beyond the subject
property boundaries.
c. The applicant should obtain permission and cooperation
from the adjacent landowners in order to provide the
necessary underpinning of adjacent building foundations
in addition to or as a part of the required storing
system.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permtt, the method used
for handling both surface and subsurface drainage during
construction and in the permanent final design should be
^
,.-,
Memo: 700 S. Galena - Preliminary Plat - Public Hearing
Page Two
February 25, 1982
approved by a geotechnical consultant. The design should
i.ncorporate on-site retention of storm flows to minimize
impacts on downhi 11 . property . Sever.a 1 methods for
handling the drainage have been suggested by the appli-
cant's engineers and contractors.
Planning Office
Review: Due to signifi.cant problems regarding the topographical,
geological and hydrological aspects of the 700 S. Galena Street
Project, the applicant was requested by P & Z to obtain certifi-
cation from an independent firm stating that these problems
could be mitigated. In answer to the request, the appl icant
has prOVided the following information:
1. Soil s and Foundation Study - Chen and Associates
2. Review of Project Drawings and Subsoil Information -
Chen and Associates
3. Revi.ew of Soil Report and Project Drawings - Schnabel
Foundation Company
4. Review of Soils Reports, Project Drawings and Site
Inspection - Spencer, Whi.te & Prentis, Inc.
5. Methods of Dewatering Project Site - Bob Pati 110
After reviewing this information, the Engineering Department
has found that the studi.es and letters are adequate certifica-
tion, at this point in time, that the problems can be mitigated.
However, as stated in the Enginering comments, final design
information must be approved by the Engineering Office prior to
building permit issuance.
Another question was raised at the January 19 Public Hearing
on the preliminary plat regilrding the appropriateness of the
solar panels to be used for domestic hot water. Since the
site does not have outstanding solar access, it was questioned
whether the panels wou 1 d be advisabl e, especi ally since the
surrounding neighbors expressed concern about the height and
placement of the solar panels in relation to their property.
It was suggested that alternative energy features that would
provide the same or greater energy. efficiency as the panels
be researched. The applicant has obtained a letter from
Colorado Engineering Associates, Inc. (attached) summarizing
five energy source options, including' so lar pane.1 s, for
domestic hot water heating. The best option mentioned was
the use of a conventional gas fired hot water tank system
with a demand control to1 imit energy use du.ring preselected
times. .
In the 1978 residential GMP competition the 700 S. Galena
Project was given a maximum score of 3 poi.nts in the Energy
category. The proposal for the provi s.i on of solar pane.ls.
was part of the energy package that enabled the project to
receive that score. A decision should be made as to whether
the app li.cant shoul d adhere to the original proposal or if an
equivalent energy source can be. used to achieve the same
results; Since. the quality of the solar access is question-
able and due to the surrounding neighbor's concern for the
design of the solar panels, the Planning Office feels that
the conventional gas fired hot.water tank system recommended
by Colorado Engineering Associates, Inc. should be used as an
alternative to the solar panels.
The current proposed project is to have 26 underground parking
spaces and one surface parking space. ..Aocording.. to a parking
agreement which runs with the property deed, a 90 foot by
I"'"
.^""".
Memo: 700 S. Galena - Preliminary Plat - Public Hearing
Page Three
February 25, 1982
100 foot parcel on the north end of the subject property must
be reserved for parki ng to accommodate ten standard-s ized auto-
mobiles. This reserved parking is part of a 1976 agreement
providing the necessary parking for the Continental Inn. The
parking must be reserved at 700 S. Galena until a time when the
ten parking spaces are legally transferred back to the Inn or
another adjacent parcel to the Inn or until the off-street
parking required of the Inn by the .CJty of Aspen is reduced at
least ten spaces. In lightof.the agreement, the 27 proposed
spaces wi 11 accommodate the ten spaces to be reserved, and the
ne.cessary 17 spaces for the 11 proposed units. The appl icant,
however, is currently worktng on an agre.ement.to transfer :the
ten deed restricted spaces back to the Continental Inn site.
If this is done, the 27proposed.spaces would more than cover
the remaining 17 spaces that are required and may even be
reduced from 27 to the required 17 spaces. There i.s a problem,
however, in where these spaces will be pI aC.ed at the Conti]nenta 1
Inn. Unless the appl icant can show that sufficient parking
currently exists for the Continental Inn, the Woods tone Lqdge
and the proposed 700 S. Galena Street Project, the Planning
Office recommends that the entire 27 spaces be provided at the
700 S. Galena Street site. .
.During the conceptual subdivi.si.onreview the Planning and
Zoning Commissi on expressed an interest in requi.ring a com-
pletion schedule for the proposed project to assure that H is
constructed in a timely manner. Section 7-141 .of the Aspen
Municipal Code amends. the Uniform. Building Code to include the
following requirements on bui.lding permit expiration which
could be instrumental in requiring a completion schedule. .
1. The work authorized by a buflding permit mus.t commen,ce
within 120 days from the date of issuance of the permit
or the permit becomes null and void. .
2. Work equal to 10% of the evaluation of the enti.re project
must be completed in each 60 day per.iod after work cpm~
mences until the project is completed or the permit;
expires. .
3. If a permit expires, the follOWing provisions shall aPply:
a) All below grade excavation shall be fnled within
30 days of expiration in order to bring the site to a
condition comparable to that before permit issuance.
b,) Any protective structures placed in the right-of-Way
as well as all hazardous conditions must be removed
within 10 days of permit expiration.
c) Before work can recommence, a new permit must be
obtained. .
d) No permit shall be reissued for any construction or
activity prohibited by law at the time of the applica-
tionfor reissuance.
4. Whenever practical difficultIes or unnecessary hardships
occur in meeting this section of the Code, the Board of
Appeals may vary .01' modify the application of this section
so that the intent and purpose of the Code is still
observed.
The Planning and Zoning Commission also requested that the
applicant illustrate how the proposed project will work wi h
and without an RBO as the appl icantmay submit an RBO appl ca-
tion at some time in the futUre. The applicant has stated
^
~
Memo: 700 S. Galena - Preliminary Plat - Public Hearing
Page Four
February 25, 1982
that if an RBO is requested and approved there will be an
additional five units in the project. With the addi.tional
units included there will be three levels, each approximately
ten feet high. Without the additional .RBO units there will
be two stories, each approximately 14 feet high.
The applicant has met several of the conditions of conceptual
submission approval as the access to the parking garage as
well as an accessible trash area has been properly indicated
in the preliminary plat. The 'applicant should be required to
meet all of the obligations committed to in the amended 1978
GMP application.
Planning Office
Recommendation: The Planning Office recommends that the Planning and Zoning
Commission grant approval to the pre limi nary pl at for the
JOO South Galena Street Project subject to the following
conditi ons:
1. The applicant must prov.ide 26 underground parking spaces
and one surfac.e park.ing space.at JOO S. Galena or transfer
10 parking spaces from JOO S. Galena back to the Continental
Inn and retain 17 spaces at JOO S. Galena with the trans-
fer sUbject to the Planning Office's and Engineering
Department's approval.
2. The applicant must obtain. the necessary easements from
the previous property owner in the areas where project
construction encroaches upon these easements.
3. In order to insure slope stablization the following is
required:
a. A comprehensive engineering design for both temporary
and permanent earth retaining structures with the
final design reviewed, signed and sealed by a geo-
technical engineer and approved by the Engineering
Office prior to building permit issuance.
b. The applicant must obtain permission and construction
easements from affected property owners prior to
temporary shorings which extend beyond the subject
property boundaries.
c. The appli.cant should obtain permi.ssion and cooperation
from the adjacent land owners in order to provide the
necessary underpinning of adjacent building foundations
in addition. to or as a part of the'required storing
system.
4.. Prior to issuance of a .bu.ilding permit, the method used
for handl ing both surface. and. subsurface drainage during
construction and in the permanent final design should be
approved by a geotechnical consultant. The design shoul d
incorporate on-si.teretentlon of storm flows to minimize
impacts on downhill property. Several methods for
handli.ng the dr.ainage have been suggested by the appl i-
cant's engineers and contractors.
5. Prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy, th.e appli-
cant must fulfill all obligations that he commited to
in the complete, amended application including, but not
limited to the following:
a. .27% of the site shall be retained as opefl space;
. .
b. Drairiagecon,trol ..facilities shall be provided on the
site, including..a series .0fdrY wells, retention
wells, and a plilnted diversion berm;
I""-.
---
Memo.: 700 S. Galena - Preliminary Plat - Public Hearing
Page Five
February 25, 1982
c. Energy canservatian features shall be incarparated in
the building, incl uding energy efficient fi replaces,
insulatian exceeding regulated standards and gas fired
hat water heaters with demand cantral to. limit energy
use.
d. Sacial facilities shall be prav.ided within the praject,
including a child care center, recycling facilities
and an indaar/autdaar paal;
e. Site design shall be as shawn in the amended app 1 i ca-
ti,an . uS,ing a three-story straight 1 ine canfiguratian
which will maxi.mi.ze salar utilizatian;
f. Si.dewalks shall be canstructed alang S. Galena Street;
g. Elevatars and stairs shall be pravided to. serve the
three staries fram the parking garage;
h. Site and building design shall permit unabstructed
mavement far wheel chair canfined ar ather handicapped
persans;
i. The twelve emp 1 ayee uni ts at 925 Durant (part af thi s
jaint applicatian) must be deed restricted to. law
incame priar to. abtaining a certificate'af accupancy
an the units at 700 S. Galena;
j, All ather abligatians nat listed abave but established
in the complete amended applicatian far 700 S. Galena
shall be pravided;
k. priar to. issuance af a building permit, the plans
shall be submitted to. the Planning Office far canfirma-
tian af their cansistency with the amended GMP appl ica-
tion, as appraved by P & Z and City Cauncil.
6. The applicant recognizes that preliminary plat appraval
daes nat signify any acceptance., nar create any re 1 i ance,
upan a subsequent RBO an other applications.
]. Constructian an the 700 S. Galena Street Prgject must
start as early in the Spdng bf 1982 as the sails allow
and the applicant must agree to. the completian schedule
found in Sectian ]-141af the Municipal Cade. This
schedule indIcates that ten percent of the total evalua-
tion of the project must be camp 1 eted each 60 days.
..-'.e--'....
.-'
-..
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Alice Davis, Planning Office
Jay Hammond, Engineering Office *
FROM:
DATE:
February 23, 1982
RE:
700 South Galena Preliminary Plat
Having reviewed the above revised preliminary plat, made several
site inspections, and reviewed several geotechnical and foundations.
reports, the Engineering Department has the following comments:
I. Utility Easements - We have noted that the project proposes
construction into easements existing on the property. The
applicant has verified that the easements in question are generally
not in use, are privately owned and have expressed confidence
that the easements can be obtained by HBC. As far as we are
aware, the easements still need to be obtained by the applicant.
2. Parking - In a letter to the Planning Office dated February 19,
Mark Danielson states that an agreement transferring the parking
reserved on the site for the Continental Inn back to the Continental
site is being executed. It is not clear at this point whether there
is room at the Continental for the needed spaces and we would
appreciate the opportunity to review the original agreement, the
needs, and the available space at the Continental Inn.
3. Slope Stabilization - A major area of concern, raised by this
office in a memo at the conceptual stage of the review process, involves
the steep slope and proposed retaining structures in the southeast corner
of the parcel. Despite the applicant's statements to the contrary
in the Planning and Zoning Commissions meeting of January 19, a
requested soils report was not supplied to this office until January
20. That report, and the flurry of letters and recommendations the
applicant has obtained since that time, suggest several comments:
a. A key comment contained in the Chen and Associates report
of December 18, 1981, is the recommendation that "a comprehensive
engineering design for both temporary and permanent earth retaining
structures" be undertaken. It is further s.tated that the final
design should be reviewed by a geotechnical engineer. We would add
that the design should be signed and sealed by a geotechnical engineer
and checked by our office prior to issurance of the building permit.
b. Several reports note that the best method of temporary
shoring would be to use tiebacks into the native soils beyond the
property lines. It is important that the applicant obtain necessary
permission and construction easements from all property owners so
affected.
....--_.~
~
.1'""'\
Page 2
February 23, 1982
700 South Galena Preliminary Plat
c. Chen further recommends that "a thorough investigation
of the perimeter site conditions be made to evaluate their impact on
the required retaining system." It would appear that no matter
what retaining system is used, "underpinning of adjacent building
foundations could be required in addition to or as part of the
shoring system." Such methods are certainly possible but, again,
will require the permission and cooperation of the adjacent owners.
4. Drainage - The soils reports and subsequent recommendations of
the various foundation contractors and engineers suggest specific
methods for handling both surface and subsurface drainage during
construction and in the permanent final design. We would further
suggest that drainage also be address by designs approved by a
geotechnical consultant prior to issuance of the building permit.
The design should incorporate on-site retension of storm flows
to minimize impacts on downhill property.
JHjco
f? '
~
~
PATTILLO ASSOCIATES
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
February 22, 1982
HBC Investments
450 So. Galena Suite 202
Aspen, CO. 81611
attn: Mr. Mark Danielson
reo 700 So. Galena Project
Gentlemen ;
We reccmnend the use of excavation shoring for the above project.
This shoring should be installed by a qualified shoring contractor
using specific recomnendations of the soils engineer. The shoring
is necessary in order to place pennanent concrete walls directly
adjacent to the property line without disturbing existing buildings
or slopes.
We understand that subsurface water will very likely be encountered
during excavation. T~rary dewatering of the excavation cut is
easily accarm:xlated; the timber lagging nay be spaced sliP;htly
between boards, allowing any subsurface water to seep through. It
\\QuId be collected near the base of the cut and probably pumped out
of the excavation area.
Pennanent dewatering will probably be achieved by placing porous
drainboards CENKA-Boards, or equal) directly against the timber
lagging for the full area of the foundation walls. The concrete
v.uuld then be placed directly against the drainboard. The water
\\QuId flow down through the boards and v.uuld be collected at the
base of the wall by a series of weep holes and pumped away or
perhaps routed to an interior drywell.
We should reiterate that the shoring to support the excavation cut
v.uuld be designed to retain the soils on a tanporary basis. Per-
manent retention v.uuld be provided by the final concrete walls and
concrete first floor system. The t~rary sherinr: v.uuld be left
in place, per industry standard.
We are currently in the process of designing the foundations based on
the systems described above. Please do not hesitate to call us should
you require any further infonnation.
~
"
\J
Robert M. Pattillo, P.E.
p 0 ElOX 751 . CL [: r'J\NCJC)~'l c;p;:J;C
-c-:,
.:,) ,
r'-j;_--~;::;;/.UC.:J 8~60~ . (303)945-9695
.~
.""'"
-..
Colorado Engineering Associates, Inc.
790 West Tennessee Avenue
Denver. Colorado 80223 USA
303/777,9817
February
Ref. No:
Project:
22, 1982
3/2/C
Galena
Mr. Mark Danielson, Consultant
R.E. Planning & Development
450 S. Galena St., Suite 202
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Ref: 700 S. Galena Project
Energy Source
Domestic Hot Water
Dear Sir:
As you requested, we have made a preliminary study of the domestic
hot water system and the possible use of solar energy as an energy
source for the above project. Our study indicates the following
options are available to you:
Option 1: Increase the insulation R values of the building
exterior walls and roof to offset the energy requirements
of the domestic hot water system.
We do not feel that this is a viable option due to the high
R values already shown for the proposed construction. We
believe that any significant increase in R values for the
exterior walls would significantly alter the proposed con-
struction methods and require a redesign of this project.
Option 2: Installation of a low temperature solar panel
energy source using flat collector panels.
In our opinion this is not a viable option because the
location of the project does not have adequate exposure to
the sun for a reasonable number of roof mounted solar panels.
The square foot area requirements would create a very large
and distracting array of panels on the roof, assuming it
were physically possible to place them there.
Option 3: Use of a smaller number of high temperature solar
panels on the roof to assist a conventional gas fired hot
water tank system. These are focusing type panels.
~
.~
---,.
We do not consider this a good option because the number
of panels required to provide a significant contribution
to the btu requirements of the hot water system would
still be high and the energy contribution during winter
would still not be high, because of the limited exposure
to the sun mentioned above.
Option 4: Use of a limited number of roof mounted solar
panels with a heat pump system.
This is a reasonable option because of the relatively small
number of solar panels required and the high energy
efficiency of a heat pump system. However, the initial
cost of installation is higher than the other options.
Option 5: Use of a conventional gas fired hot water tank
system with a demand control to limit energy use during
preselected times.
At the present time we consider this the best option you
have for the following reasons:
1. Poor location of the project from a solar energy
standpoint.
2. Does not require the use of solar roof mounted units.
3. The most simple and least expensive system to install
and maintain.
Some additional energy savings might be possible with option
5 by the increase of the R value of the roof construction.
This will have to be verified with the project architect.
Please be advised that these options are based on preliminary
studies and are subject to variations in data not available
at the present time.
Sincerely,
COLORADO ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
J~~
James N. Brooke, Ph,D. P.E.
Chief Engineer
JNB/mp
/
i~'"
foundations
Y"""'lerplnnlng
c. ed.ln caissons
heavy construction
Cat Contr. Lie. No. 188365
SPENCER, \'JHITE & PRENTlS, INC.
CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS
22225 Foothill Boulevard
Hayward, California 94541
Post Office Box 718
Havward. Callfornia 94543
(4151538.1530
February 19, 1982
H. B. C. Investments
450 S. Galena Street
Suite 202
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attention: Mr. Mark Danielson
Gentlemen:
Having visited the site of your proposed 700 South Galena Street project in
Aspen, Colorado and after reviewing the information provided by you, we
submit herewith,the following observations and comments.
We do not, at present, foresee any insurmountable difficulty in the design
and installation of a temporary, earth support system about the perimeter of
the proposed excavation at your 700 Galena Street site. Additional infor-
mation, however, would be required from your soils engineer to complete our
design of the retention system(s), such as lateral soil pressure diagrams and
ordinates, slope and structure surcharge pressures and other pertinent design
parameters.
The bank support system we would propose at your site wocld consist of a
series of intermittent, steel beams( "soldier" piles) placed and concreted in pre-drilled
shafts placed along the intended shoring bulkhead lines prior to commencing
any excavation on the site. Upon the installation of same, excavation would
commence with wood, inter-pile lagging members being placed between and behind
the flanges of the steel beams, to retain the soil beyond the area of the ex-
cavation. Depending upon the depth of the excavation being considered, lateral
restraint of the shoring bulkheads may be required either in the form of an
internal waler-bracing system or by external "tieback" anchorages placed be-
neath the adjacent private properties and public ways. (Ref. enclosed sketches)
Either method would provide the necessary lateral restraint of the shoring
bulkheads, however, the installation of "tieback" anchors would require prior
permission of the adjacent property owners and,or public entities, as the anchors
would extend beyond the site's property lines.
If it is intended to maintain the existing ground surface along the south side
of this site, adjacent to the existing 3-story frame building, an internally-
braced shoring bulkhead would be required in this area due to the proximity
of the exisLing structure's basement which would preclude the use of external,
"SPENCER, WHITE & PRENTlS''':l
,.....,
Page 2
CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS
Attention: Mr. Mark Danielson
February 19, 1982
tieback anchors. Also, if the bottom of the adjacent building's wall foot-
ings are found to be at an elevation which is higher than a 1.5:1 (h/v) in-
fluence line, projected upward from the lcwest excavation grade of the new
structure, then the existing. building would have to be underpinned, to pre-
vent any horizontal displacement and/or vertical settlement of the structure.
Dewatering of the site during construction could, we feel, be accomplished
by means of various intercept-discharge methods, i.e. trenching~ sumping,
etc., to collect and divert any surface or underground water flows. General
site dewatering, by means of wells etc., may also be required to complete the ex-
cavations of your site.
The equipment required to perform the above-noted shoring and underpinning
work is presently located in the Denver area and could readily be trans-
ported to your site.
The foregoing outlines my initial assessment of the bank support work required
on your project and,as noted above, we will require additional geotechnical
data and design criteria to complete our design of the necessary bank support
and/or underpinning systems.
In the event you require any further elaboration or detail in this regard, please
do not hesitate to call.
Many thanks again for the excellent accomodations and reception provided during
my recent visit.
Sincerely yours,
2f. j /J /17
" l/)A.(.:JL .
ohn R. Schneide , Jr.
SUBJECT
SPE~R, WHITE & PREN'AS, Inc.
T"II'KAL.. SHo#!JtJ6 {,4/.4LL WITH /tN ~ItL DRAWING No.' '5:6-("
EAI!:rH nElJ,I'rC.J( IUSUA/1vr sySlEtVl
COMPUTER -::rs- CHECK EO By DAn: /9 Fe.81!.v1W-'t /9F2-
~
.
./
~.;
. ~:~ SCALa ,lJi$
J>/!.bAlE..
.........:~... "
i,^"'~ "/
\l Ii
STEeL SOl...blER.:. 8E".4M
SLJP ,o.AN€: -:J .
(st>/L I'~) V
\
\
I
\
\
\
WooD "'-A66/"';f,," $QAIJ.j)S
l307"1nl'1 of
cxcAwt1CD A~
,,/,.,-...:. '" ...."",,, //
'pLAN
I
l-+--
I
I
I
I
. I
I
I
FwAlM71QI-J l-/AL(.. I..JNt!.
OF'- f\/Ew B<I//J)/Nb (.~ 3")
~
I-..-,;".-!
If '."1'
~9,.~
- ~._..--~ .
"
.
SUBJECT
I -~
I .~.." SCALE ,vTS
SPE~ER, WHITE & PRENAS, Inc.
TYfIOf-L r-Ho~N6 WALL WiTH Alii 1N71f~ItL
, 1<1+ /<U.. gl!A<.E. /!.ESTRAl N I SY oS T.l!""
DRAWING No. S'G-.2.. ....
DAn
Pl?oFtLE..
///^,'\......./......... /.:.;.
PLAN
(,.,
C'
COMPUTER ::r:s
,
CHECIiCI:O BY
. /9 Fe.Yw1'lfl.'I /9f:l-
(I II
57&i- saLlJia. 8EA>'1
\\ II
WA'-€JI..
(;viJOO
"1..A661Nf:.u (5dM./JS
Iwr'nM OF
~~
. "
'ONC.~
H€EUL..oa:..
(I //
w~
...- _._--- - .....--~-~..,--"i""--:-~.....
O'
~.
.
~
~
.~
HBC Investments
450 S. Galena Street
Suite 202
Aspen, Colorado 81611
February 19, 1982
Ms. Alice Davis
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: 700 S. Galena Preliminary Plot Review
Dear Alice:
Submitted for review are the additional materials and information on the
700 S. Galena Project as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Due to the
technical nature of these materials, most have been submitted previously to the
City Engineering Department for their review. It is also appropriate that the
information be reviewed by your department and possibly included in the P & Z
packet. These studies and additional information respond to all the concerns
brought up at the public hearing, and show that those problems and concerns may
all be fully resolved with construction and drainage techniques indicated therein,
without any site plan changes beyond those mentioned here. A brief summary of
the information contained in the materials is given below:
1. Soils and Foundation Study, by Chen and Associates, Inc, (Study dated
December, 1981) Disturbed and relatively undisturbed samples of the
project site soils were taken for review by the engineer and laboratory
testing. A total of five soil borings were made, of which only one hole
indicated subsurface seepage. Thus, "backfill should consist entirely
of relatively free draining granular material compacted...this type
backfill will reduce the design lateral earth pressure and allow for
(cont'd)
1"""..
'-'
-2-
1.
drainage of any subsurface seepage such as encountered in Hole #5 at
the southeast cprner of the lot... an underdrain (system) should consist
of a perforated pipe installed in free draining gravel placed at least
one foot below lowest adjacent grade and sloped on a minimum 190
grade...a drywell system extending into the underlying relatively clean
gravels may be feasible for disposal of ground water seepage."
,
Foundation recommendations include spread footings placed entirely on
the natural coarse granular subsoils...but a pad and grade beam type
system may prove the most feasible where lower 'floor elevations are above
the gravel layer. "... Temporary shoring will probably be required to
maintain excavation slope stability... We expect that shoring within
low retaining height of about 12 feet or less can be a cantilevered
system. For greater depths, a braced or tieback system would probably
be required."
2. Review of Project Drawings and Subsoil Information, by Chen and Associated,
Letter of January 25, 1982.
temporary shoring to maintain bank stability and prevent move-
ment of adjacent structure will be required. S~ch methods are not unusual
Inc.
"
when cons i dering hi gher dens i ty development on a:corfined area such as
this ,... we believe a properly designed and installed temporary shoring
system will satisfactorily support excavated slopes and prevent movement
of adjacent structures. Dewatering of hillside seepage ... can also be
performed during the shoring wall installation."
~
,~
-3-
3. Review of soils reports and project drawings, by Schnabel Foundation
Company. Letter, proposal, and sketches dated February II, 1982.
Based upon the investigation to determine the feasibility of
using a retention system to allow excavation on a vertical face of
the property 1 i nes, "we see no reason why such a system cannot be con-
structed and adjacent property and structures be protected.
The soils described in your boring logs are similar to other soils
where we have successfully retained vertical excavations."
Recommendation is made by Schnabel for a tieback system using driven
H-Piles, wood logging and tiebacks and/or internal rakers. Such a
system would require permiSSion from adjacent property owners."
If groundwater or boulders prevent successful installation of
tiebacks, or if permission (from adjacent property owners) cannot be
obtained to install tiebacks, internal rakers may be used ... We
have used both of these systems throughout the United States including
Denver, Vail, and Steamboat Springs." Schnabel is one of the largest
foundation/engineering firms in the U.S. They have recently worked
on the Tabor Center in Denver. Under the general provisions of
their proposal, standard insurance in the amount $1,000,000/2,000,000
is given for property damage and bodily injury liability. Additional
insurance may be obtained.
4. Review of soils reports, project drawings, and site inspection,
by Spencer, White, and Prentis, Inc. Letter and sketches dated Feb, 19, '8
The earth support systems proposed by this firm is also those of
tie backs or an internally braced shoring bulkhead. "Either method
.
(cont'd)
~
~
-4-
4. would provide the necessary lateral restraint of the shoring
bulkheads." Dewatering could be accomplished by means of trenching
and sumping during construction, and by means of wells for general
site dewatering.
5. The south-east corner of the building has been re-drawn to allow a
17 foot space between the property line and the building itself.
The property owner has changed the design as another option to allow
more space between the retaining wall on the property line and
the building itself. The effect is to decrease the depth of the
excavation at the property line. See architectural drawing.
6. Methods of dewatering project site, by Bob Patillo, letter dated
February 22, 1982. Temporary dewatering is accomplished by spacing
the timber lagging to allow seepage of any subsurface water.
Permanent dewatering is achieved by porous drain boards (Enka-
boards or equivalent) placed against the timber lagging, collected
at the base of the wall routed to a series of dry-wells.
7. Solar options, by Colorado Engineering Associates. Letter dated
February 22, 1982. Outlines the fine options relating to the solar
aspects of the project. Total heating of domestic hot water not
feasible due to project location. Use of solar panels with gas
fired boiler assisted system inappropriate due to the large number
of panels necessary for such a system in the particular location.
.
~
~
-5-
(cont'd) 7. Use of solar panels with assist from heat pumps would be preferable
as this system would require the least number of panels. Increasing
the insulation of the roof in lieu of solar panels would increase
energy savings without installation of a minimal efficiency solar
system. The last option is to eliminate the solar system, due to
project location, area available for solar panels, and potential
visual impacts. This last option is seen to be the most realistic,
from those reviews done to date.
8. Parking for project. An agreement to transfer those ten spaces reserved
on the Galena site (for use by Continetal Inn) back to the Continental
Inn site is being executed. This eliminates the requirement of the
Galena project to contain 27 parking spaces. The project is now only
required to have 17 parking spaces. All these spaces are provided for
in the project, and meet code size requirements.
These studies that have been done, and the information provided should resolve
those problems and concerns expressed at the last Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting. Should you have any additional questions or need additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your time and attention,
Best regards,
~/.)~
r
Mark A. Danielsen
,,~ - 'l
r,
~
.
Aspen/Pitk. ning Office
~ .
130 s (jillUl;';:~' '~~i[!s t r e e t
.,"'.i'...........'I"t~'i"....I'....":ll:f'~,,.':ir'~....
aspen;~~A~~ri~~h81611
.:;.');"~~~'~~ J~,;Ml~_"llI'UI'jlIlI,~.:.
't:1~.,; :.,....'.'"., .,~: .':~'.~~..~....,":'it. ~~
, ~:' ..~'~""::'~~~':~::~~.~f~~.':"'::'.
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: 700 South Galena Street - Preliminary Plat
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public heartng wtll be held before the
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commtssion on Tuesday, March 2, 1982 at a meeUng
to begin ~t 5:00 p.m. in the City CouncIl Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena,
Aspen. IThe public hearing was previously s.et for January 19; then tabled
to February 2; and recently tabled to March 2J The Commission will cons.i.der
the Preliminary Plat application for 700 S. Galena (formerly known as 500 S.
Galena) located at lot 16 and parcel B, block 2, Anthony Acres Subdivision,
Aspen. The app 1 i cants, Hans and June Cantrup, are propos tng to build 16 one-
bedroom free market units and one employee unit. The project was awarded an
allotment in the 1978 residential GMP and recently received approval from
City Council for amendments to the proposal. For further information, contact
the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, 925-2020, ext. 227.
sl Olof Hedstrom
Cnatrman, Aspen Planning and Zoning
Commission .
'Se.,V\;L~h 'I r ~
C'-\~ _..ti ~ f..f. . {\
~~~
o ~ ,1.-.
..,/V~ +
/
/"v
./
/~
.'
~
c
.,-.."
~~ South Galena Project
. ,. Adjacent, Property O\,ncrs
,-.,
~
"
'.
^~
'.1.. Al-penblick Condominium Association (15 condominiums)
c/o Fas.ching IInus
747 S.'..Galcna Street
Aspen, Colorndo Sl611
.
.' ... '.,2 Andt:r~nan.. . C/~o,rgc '~G. ..:
?06 Denver Building
1776 Lincoln Street -
Denver~ Colorado 80202
CC"L I I' ~ ,flc.C9 ~(
Chr1t>+"f1N..rJ5,~ (0 ('JK-c Y
'------ >
~ , Jfenill,:ter-
Ik:rnn1fr :J..i\VeNirn~vds
,.3:.'
ii ".... 1
L"'. ",.", -
~H I ' '\.. (
:"'S.'-Colgzrt,,',$tirl,:ngA 1i'Rosie \'1.
, ,.4G16 Ridgel>'ay
. l\lamost'New,..;"'~i'C() . .Jf7"544
{"\ :./....... "
c;;/'){.>7 'f
};;';( h ~(:) ;,..~,__, J)/,L('.
.'
1 '>1
J! 0/ ci;-l/S
6. Kettle Corporation
,,_ ~:"',,\':;C},:p_O~.'''T>';,,',y''Bv&Q ,. ('
-.- _: .~.;~~:w~6"" . --(7'n i 0.:::; :i(.) s."{, 'j "') -
\'h '~I ' , .-.... . . - ' .. -
'.....,'"
7.
':...,
The Tipple Lodge (12 Condominiums)
.A Joint Venture
P_O. 13.ox 147
. Aspen , Col'O:tado 81612
'1' .,;, :.:e~.
'Popeily !1-Onald' M, ....
"1.2'32,1'i'Onte' . Cielo' Dr. .
-n 1 ,,,'11, "''"l'f .
'vever_::....,l~ 5,..:....a..~ =~a
90210
. ',..
.
"
','
'.
'" .
"
,'-.... ... ..~. .
..,.... .........
.....' .'
.......:. .....:. .::.
'."
.
..
..
J.'
I
~.
."
,.
, "
.....
'"
.
..
,.'
.
r-.
^
Schnabel
FOUNDATION COMPANY
February 11, 1982
HBC Investments
450 South Galena
Suite 202
Aspen, Colo. 81611
Atten: Mark Danielson
Re. South Galena Project
Gentlemen,
We have carefully examined the soils report for your South
Galena Project. In concurrence with basic recommendations of the
Soils Report, we have made a preliminary investigation to determine
the feasibility of using a retention system to allow excavation
on a vertical face to the property lines. Based on the informa-
tion available at this time, we see no reason why ~~~!~F<
c:".!!.~2~~!:!!!E.':SE_ed ~i_!'.~~~.p.E2l';;.rty..~~~.!..s...t;.ElIn,,,!'~!'
erotected. The soiIS:described in your boring logs are similar
to-'otl1e-r-soils where we have successfully retained vertical ex-
cavations.
The depth of cut proposed on your site is not unusual and
does not present any unusual problems regarding the design and
construction of a retention system. Adjacent structures must be
examined carefully and if necessary, surcharge factors must be
added to sheeting claculations in these areas. Mr. Bob Patillo
has indicated that the existing apartment building on the south
of the site has a basement extending 16' to 20' below existing
grade. If this is verified, no underpinning of this structure
will be required, however, it will be necessary to excavate to
the tops of the existing footings to eliminate sheeting in this
area. This is standard industry practice in a situation of
this nature.
The sheeting will consist of driven H-Piles, wood lagging
and tiebacks, and for internal rakers. In order to place the
new structure on the property line, the soldier piles must be
driven on adjacent private or public property. Permission must
be obtained to perform this work. To support the H-Piles, tie-
backs will be used whenever possible. The tiebacks provide a
much cleaner excavation and also are much more effective in
limiting sheeting movement. The tiebacks will be drilled under-
neath adjacent property and will also require permission from
Denver office: 8000 East Girard Ave.. Denver. CO 80231 . (:HJ3) 6%,7268
Regional offices: Washingtnn . Philadelphia. Atlanta. Chicago
,-.,..
,-.,.,
.Jchnabel
fOLJ!'-.'DATION COMPANY
2
adjacent property owners. If groundwater or boulders prevent
successful installation of tiebacks or if permission cannot be
obtained to install tiebacks, internal rakers may be used to sup-
port the sheeting. We have used both of these systems throughout
the United States including Denver, Vail and Steamboat Springs.
For a property designed sheeting system for depth of cut planned
on this project, inward movement may be expected to range from
!,;" ti 3/4". In order to assure proper performance, every tieback
will be tested to an overload. In addition, the top of the
sheeting should be monitored weekly by the general contractor.
Since there are louver spaces between the lagging boards,
water will enter the excavation freely through existing subsur-
face routes. During construction, the water must be handled
by sumps or wells as the General Contractor chooses. In addition,
the structural engineer must design perimeter and under floor
drainage. This is outside the scope of our expertise. It should
also be pointed out, that this retention system is temporary in
nature and that the structure must be designed to support the
permanent earth pressure loadings.
Our conclusions are summarized as follows:
1). The building as currently envisioned will require a
retention system.
2). The soil conditions and depth of cut are within the
ranges of normal retention system design and construc-
tion.
3). Retention system design must take into account adjacent
structures.
4). It will be necessary to receive permission to place
the retention system on adjacent property.
5). Expected lateral movements are sw~ll.
6). The retention system is temporary use and does not effect
permanent earth pressures or dewatering.
Enclosed, you will find schematics of tieback and braced re-
tention systems showing the basic elements of the sheeting and the
fundamental spatial relationships. You will also find our proposal
for the work as currently proposed.
Sincer:e~YJ, . "( .
HUb~D~:~~'n/III,
Denver office: 8000 East Girard Ave., DeIlver, CO 80z:n .S(~ll5fh'9G'-~2gwnager
Regional offices: \Vashington .. Pbil;ldelphia .. Atlanta.. Chic.ago
.~
~
/J ,
./ .'._.~~
PE
Schnabel ~.
FOUNDATION COMPANY
P.O. Box 867
Tucker, GA 30084
(404) 938-0940
.~
Headquarters:
Berhesda, Maryland
Regional Offices,
Arlanta . Chicago. Philadelphia. Washington
PROPOSAL
H B C Investments
Atten: Mark Danielson
REF:
South (;"lena Bldg.
Aspe!b-<::_0_lQ._~{2f,5:-86l0) DATE: l'el>,I.\l_"ry-U, l282
Gentlemen:
The undersigned proposes to furnish all materials and perform all labor necessary to complete the following:
All of the above work to be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner in accordance with the general provisions below for the
sum of: ___. ($ _ ) Dollars.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Coordination - The excavation shall be coordinated with the work. Access to, around, and off the site shall be provided free of
charge, allowing work to proceed in an orderly and uninterrupted manner. For the following: (a) Sheeting: Excavalion support uSing
H;beams and wood lagging type of sheeting. Excavation to the tops of the soldier beams shall be completed prior tothe start of placing
soldie, beams. A -:5U foot firm level bench will be required at the top elevation of the soldier beams. Right-of-way so that
the soldier beams can be installed in one continuous operation is required. Layout of the soldier beams shall also be required. For
lagging installation, excavation to the front flange of the soldier beam shall be "by others". (b) Underpinning: Excavation to the top of
footings shall be completed prior to the start of underpinning work. A suitable roadway for concrete trucks adjacent to th'Senderpinnlng
site is required, (c) Tiebacks: Right-of-way enabling one continuous operation for tieback installation is required. A
foot firm level bench will be required at the tieback grade. (Se Sk-4)
2. Temporary Utilities & Services - The following will be plovl!edTree of charge: 220 volt 60 amp 3'phase electncai power prior to
any wale installation, outlets to be located every 100 feet along the line of work; 110 volt 40 amp electrical power outlets, and water
connections under normal city pressure located within 100 feet of every Sheeting, Underpinning and Tieback operation prior to
installation of this work; job toilets; watchman services; space for a job trailer approximately 10' x 40' in size.
3, Plans and Permission - A detailed plan will be furnished, signed by a licensed engineer, showing the original plan on which this
price is based. Changes will be made as you request, or as necessary to obtain approval of others, but if such changes result In
changed costs, the price shall be adjusted accordingly. Permission to close portions of publiC space will be obtained by others, as Will
permission to do portions of this work, including tieback installation, on adjacent private property.
4. Labor- We propose to do this job using union labor, and should labor trouble prevent us from completing this contract, we will be
paid for the cost of all work performed to that time, plus a reasonable amount for overhead and profit.
5. Exclusions - This price does not include any expense Or work in connection with the following: Concrete and excavation
(except lor underpinning and tiebacks), removal of spoil, debris, overhead and underground obstructions to driving and drilling, old
footings, footing projections and sheeting, backfill, tamping, utilities, restoration, line and grade work, pumping, demolition, treated
sheeting, fences, stairways, or barricades; protection and maintenance of slopes, benches, bermsor sheeting; fees, permits, depOSits.
bonds, 0' liquidated damages . . . . . ... ... . . .
uuderplunlog, sheet 109 other than where shown, ariyremoval
6. Change Orders - Change orders Will be executed providing Schnabel Foundation Company agrees to perform the work, all such
work orders are in writing and include the price and terms for the work, and all such orders are signed by a duly authorized
representative. No back charges will be issued, nor accepted unless 72 hrs. notice in writing of a condition requiring correction is given
with an additional and reasonable amount allowed for its correction.
7, Insurance- We propose to furnish for this work property damage and bodily injury liability insurance in the limits of $1 ,000,000/
2,000,000 with coverage for explosion, collapse and damage to underground utilities included. Should you desire insurance in
different limits, we will provide it to you at cost.
8, Payment - Payments to be made monthly by the 10th of the foilowing month for 90% of all work done the preceding month,
including materials delivered to the site or stored in Schnabel's yard. Final payments including all retainage, to be made 30 days after
substantial completion of the work stated above.
9. Acceptance - This proposal is made on the basis that if ~liceFted it shall beco~O a contract incorporating all of the terms herein
stated. This offer to perform the stated work is valid for l Y ( )days from the above date.
Accepted:
Company
Respectfully submitted,
SCHNABEL FOUNDATION COMPANY
~ -,
B /-~"/,~t./IIJ~ "I_)L rh
y,~ -~,-"",'--",,",,,-,..,,,,,-----,------,,-----,,-_.....
Hubert Deaton III, PE
Southwest Manager
Signature
Title
Witness
~
.~
SCOPE OF WORK
Provide sheeting consisting of driven H-Piles, wood
lagging with earth tiebacks and/or steel internal
rakers. See tieback schematic on Sheet SK2 and
raker schematic SK-3. In general sheeting will ex-
tend from existing grade downward to the bottom of
the new footings. In some areas, a combination of
sloping and sheeting will be used to reduce overall
costs. In this proposal and design approximately
10,000 ft2 of sheeting is included. (See Sk-l)
Schnabel
FOUNDATION COMPA/I,'Y
.
.'-"
,-.,
Schnabel
FOUNDATION COMPANY
P'eeI South Galena Project
roJ
Location Aspen, Colo.
Architect/Engineer Rob Pa H 11 0
General Contractor H R r.
Calculation Sheets
,
I ',I
I
! 1- I I" i-I
-r-j-c--1'1-+I" -1---+--1-+
, -4- '-J' -j-
_ --U- I.
.,:~
_yt+ I, .i.
I 1 : I I) ~.
-I-- -~-l--- -1- --- ---+ 1-+ - '
t ""J., k'nb", IJ ~'= I i -' 1- ii' .!!)
----r I
-
I
+----H.,
I I ;:~~~...
..YJ.&: r I I
. J?r~~~
~~ I
IA~ [" t-fdd BI"'A<-E I
Ar~l i i i ';:- i
: --t+H-H
I
lAP'"
.'-"" ~LR"
'\
" I
'. /
, II ~
C:..._ ~uvc. c.I:'~
~,A [;"1 r ;"CK
~
'~f=
~ _1..C.l::- l~ ,.
67-1.
,~ II:.,.J 1-0
1
'-
i ~M
Contract No.
Sheet No. Sk-3
Dale Feb. 11, l'
By H.D. III
I
I '
11---i' i I I .
I r I/f7t~.:
I '
, I r-~
i
I
L-..
I
I _~.~
"1
W--L+-.
I I o:.-r-:
<.,' ' <+,y hl~ll. -r
f-f- 11>1I~Ll
I l/u.I..! ~(
i! I I '
I T-'
I ! I
I I I ;---;----
, 1 I '
I
~
III
~ I
-';;:1
11: I
~:
I tl i
:a
-,.
I '
I , I
I I I ..
_.1 i
1 I '
+-L-L.-..
, ,
I '
~I
ii'
: ':'
! t-'~
I
-
.
I
i :
,
I .,
.
~
.
I
-
I :
r
I i
.
.r-,
-.
Schnabel
FOUNDATION COMPANY
Pro~ South Galena Project
Location AaptU"I, 1"'",,1 n
Architect/Engineer Bob Patillo
General Contractor H B C
Calculation Sheets
Contract No.
Sheet No. Sk-2
Date Feb. 11, 1982
By H. D. III
i
" ~ <1 ~= ---'-:1~ 1 f nIJ+f-Eb
.,I~I , I I . )'djl -~.: '1+1-+-: ,-,--1,-
I ~ Ii J . '~ I IT. -It-l-+-j- -r-rr'-;---'--'--
:o~(d -irVA'. t:._ ~__ H.,,c - ~---+- .. _t, - -1 " ---+--1--L -t--L-- ~--i--;. _dL d:_ L_.
I '~ . I I I,.':! " ,
." , . ',.',' I, I : , , I " ,! I I! : I
"'''j'f''} #-/ I f.......... . I I ,'I '
a- r-c- "',':: ~"~ I---~---i -'-! -- -1 :-_.-T-T---:-~--~----l--r -- ;-~ - .. -.
-1 :~...."' , L' i .,' I 1 I
[() v,..cr--, ~ I 7- ; tl r : -: ;- i - -;- -~-:~ -r -7-;--;---; -. -
, , T1 f ~-- --,' <.~, I - r---' --------+-+---~ -, - ,
1---'4 '\ +r' t+'~ -+ +--f~~;T--'-':-r--; -+ ~ -~ I' -; -- ,
" '-, - --,,~I~~~L+-.;.1 :ID-; -~-t-"I-+_-L, .J ~_L_._ :,
,c::.~~.t:' !. ' I i -ot-
.1-< ,11.. _ -'---'- I " L--" , "'}'... I ~._j.~ ! '.
I,' t~'. =t.-.. ,. ~ I, I ! "" "--'--- i' ~...",. ,
, __ I^ I~ ! L ' '" ",--{ , , , ., i ! I I .:,
t.Js'w ~ .1..-' 1t'liIT-- I "l:,::i,J-rJ--rkT;-r-i--l..~-t~TT-'
_ 'l, R-_ 1_ ,1 .
I I -r j' . \ ~ '___ _ I . ~i.~,J I i'~--'--!~r-id: -
S ~ J 1-1 ",,,-,,, 1-1:: 1 ::::
\'. ~_ --r~' /7{,~ 0l i c! -l--. I
! I ~--!,------ -' __L.' 1 :- d-5/1.".1 I I"~._' _L____: . :,
1 r ~;' F;tl I Ii: , " I I ' '
! I :- I r 'r-r ?, . ~ rt-1-!---:--+,---r;-~'--"-~-+- .~... '-- . ~~ ~
r--T- . ..1 -I' ~---I ~_._~_~~-<l.--"".(I' ,..~" c.:. -- -- - -- - , - -;::s::
~ 1./ ~~}'~;j,~'~,,\ <~I- f- t-t--:--;-~_LJ --t-:-~-- L 1 -; -; :. - - ~ .- ~ :
, ~I-I-t- i- j--- t ~ ----"7- +-~ T~--1 I iu 1 .L ~ - -
Ii I T m~~tr-l;l1t: · :~I-'
__+' I I', I il I I,Ji,i;i ""~1~~J\<'1 !. ! i 1. i. I -,
+' J T I r-I--r-r I , i1'1tz4 i 1--r-i : r--'
. --- *: ~- ~,.j -=t::-4~r rT:::f.I;1 ~ i L:r-r--rTi I .
"^n, ~_~. ,},;<I fhc~(. II'. tl-~.-la.1Jo+Jd ... ~;(.L1L~;;,."JJr~! +A~~;~
I i -J-..:- I I ' !' 1 I
I -1-- I _ I I: : i '
.. .It.. 87IC _ i i ok, " '" -,-u :!! i ! , i I
l#-Hil.ll! iii,i
I ,- ,I I' I r I I !, I I'
, ,I, 1 ! I I. I I ,
,
I
I
!
!
_1-
~
~
January 28, 1982
Mr. Olaf Hedstrom
Chairman
Aspen Planning & Zoning Corom.
130 S. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Sir:
As you are aware, following Russ Pie1stick's appearance in our behalf
at the January 19th Planning & Zoning Meeting, we are vitally concerned
with the Hans Cantrup Project to be built at 700 S. Galena.
We understand the engineering has not been completed and Mr. Cantrup
has requested an extension. If such an extension is granted, we in
turn request the meeting be scheduled March 2nd. It is impossible
for us to attend a February 16th meeting although we had made all
arrangements to be there February 2nd. Our house is vitally affected
by this project as it is 10 to 15 feet east of the proposed immense
hole and our balcony is only 5 feet above the proposed Cantrup 28 foot
roof line.
Very truly yours,
Jt::: An~
4999 S. Birch
Littleton, Colorado 80120
Phone: (303) 771-0237
cjp
"'~~
- V \
,-,
.-,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Alice Davis, Planning Office
RE: 700 S. Galena Street Project - Preliminary plat -
Public Hearing
DATE: January 27, 1982
Applicant's
Request:
Planning &
Zoning
Motion:
The applicant is requesting that further review of
the preliminary plat for the 700 S. Galena Street
Project be tabled and the public hearing continued
until the next regular Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting on February 16, 1982. The request is made in
order to allow time to complete and review the slope,
geological and hydrological studies requested by the
P & Z on January 19, 1982. The City Council granted
an extension on the development allocation expiration
date for this project until June 1, 1982, so it is
no longer subject to the February 1, 1982 deadline.
Council granted the extension conditioned upon the
applicant commencing construction on the companion
925 E. Durant employee housing project within thirty
days after the new June 1, 1982 deadline.
If the Planning and Zoning Commission agrees with the
applicant's request, the proper motion is as follows:
"I move to table the preliminary plat for the 700
S. Galena Street Project and continue the public
hearing until February 16, 1982."
I't\tI~
.s..i-"y
1""'.
I"'"
chen and associates, inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
.~,.. ,'l..~
: . :
~~-
"~.' \",/.
~
SOIL. FOUNDAnON
ENGINEERING
5080 RD. 154 . GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81601 . 3031945-7458
January 25, 1982
Subject: Proposed ConO:.rninium
Developnent, 700 South Galena,
Aspen, Colorado
Job No. 23,317
H.B.C. Investments
450 S. Galena, SUite 202
Aspen, Co 816ll
Gentlemen :
As requested, _ have reviewed subsoil infcmration presented in our
engineering report dated Decerrber 18,' 1981 and preliminary drawings
dated January 12, 1982 with respect to expected excavation difficulties.
Based on proposed grading plans, cut depth between about 6 to 31
feet below existing ground surface will be required to achieve lower
floor levels. Additional cut depth est.iJnated to be on the order of 10
feet will also be required to achieve foundation bearing level. Con-
sidering the proposed zero property line construction and close proximity
of adjacent structures and roadways, t:elrIOraxy shoring to maintain bank
stability and prevent rroverent of adjacent structures will be required.
Such ~~ are ~1:,_!:IDus~__~_~i<:l;e~~ ~j:t:Y~e;r.eloprent
on a UJIll.mea-area such as this. The oost of shoring instal tion can-
~ver, be-~to be sigIiificant.
T'ne subsoil profile generally consists of fine-grained soils
overlying a relatively dense granular deposit. Considering the proposed
grading and subsoil oonditions, _ believe a properly designed and installed
~raxy shorinq ~ will satiSfactorily support excavated sl~
and prevent novement 0 adjacent structures. Dewatering of hills~de
~_\~ as ena:".m~_iI1_~,_!?L1:I:!~U:~~..Jp,~~_ also be perfonred
ilurinq shorinq wall ~latJ.~. Installation uy a OOlltraa6F---.----
familiar with various types of walls, underpinning lIEtmds and tieback
or braced systBns will be required. The excavating contractors should
sul:mit the proposed excavation sequence and tine schedul~ to the engineer
for review and awroval prior to any ooostruction.
l"l'Ol'il:'lrfr't. ....c'..'''''''tlo ,......." "'.t'I~....,.... ; ,....". "''''''",....,.." e...""'.''''#' "",.., .........,.;,... , ,.................... ...,.,J....,~..,~.,~ ,,,......"". . '''''''' ,..,,,,-, '.......;,
~
.!';.-
1"'"'\
H.B.C. InvestJrents
January 25, 1982
Page 2
,,-,,
We will be available to provide you with additional rea::mrendations
or consultation upon request. If you have any question please call.
Very truly yours,
CHEN 1\ND AS9JCIATES, me.
By ,~L'kJd {! 0{JLh"A'<-..{
c..t.a..-d c. p~ h, P.E~~
R.C.H./de
cc: Bob Pattillo
f
1"'"'\.
-.,
J.D. MULLER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
JEROME PROFESSIONAL BUILDING
201 NORTIi MILL SlREET
MAlUNG ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4361
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
TELEPHONE: 303/925-1923
22 January 1982
Planning and Zoning Commission
of the City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen CO 81611
,
Re: Preliminary Plat applieation for 700 S. Galena
To the Commission:
In my letter to you dated January 19 and at the publie
hearing on the same date I asked that you require the
applieant to give eertain assuranees and undertake responsibility
for unforseen eonditions whieh might be harmful to
property around the applieant's projeet. In general terms
the applieant indieated a willingness to eooperate. I've
enelosed a draft to give you and the applieant a more
specifie idea of what I had in mind. Obviously, it is for
the Commission and the applieant to resolve this matter.
The enelosed draft is intended to give the Commission and
the applieant a elear idea of the eoncerns I expressed and
the solution I proposed.
;--
-
J.D
JDMee
XC: Speneer Schiffer, Esq.
~
-.,
J.D. MULLER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
JEROME PROFESSIONAL BUILDING
201 NORTIi MILL SlREET
MAlUNG ADDRESS: P,O. BOX 4361
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
TELEPHONE: 303/925-1923
19 January 1982
Planning and Zoning Commission
of the City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen CO 81611
Re: Preliminary Plat applieation for 700 S. Galena
To the Commission:
I live in the Tipple Inn Condominiums. I would like to
J01n my neighbors in requesting that all efforts be made to
determine the nature of underground water on and around the
project site to preclude approving for subdivision land which
is unsuitable by reason of flooding, bad drainage, rock or
soil ereep, mudlfow or the like, as provided in Section 20-9(a)
of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. I ask that some
provision be made in any approval for the possibility that
upon exeavation for the proposed underground garage, water
or soil conditions are diseovered whiehhad they been known
now would have ppeeluded approval, or are found to be
dangerous or harmful to the project or the surrounding
property, including adverse effeets upon sublateral and sub-
jaeent support. Such a provision should include the
applieant's assumption of finaneial responsibility for all
damage to surrounding property as a eondition of proceeding
further with the projeet.
I ask the Commission to requJ::re the determination by
measurement of whether or not the applicant's projeet is
subjeet to Article VI of the Muni.cipal Code, "Special
Development Permits," partieularly Section 24-6.4, "Mountain
view plane limitations and review." If the projeet is
within a view plane, the provisions of 24-8.1 and following
seetions--the Planned Unit Development procedures--apply to
the project unless exempted by the Commission as provided
in 24-6.4(E). Unless it is determined that the project is
not in a view plane, or if in one, until a PUD applieation
.~
.--.
Planning and Zoning Commission, 19 January 1982, page 2.
is eompleted or theprojeet is exempted from PUD requirements,
the project land is unsuitable for subdivision under Seetion
20-9(c).
Seetion 24-3.4, "Area and bulk requirements," provides
that the minimum lot area per dwelling unit for the L-2 zone
distriet is the same as for the R/MF zone distriet. The
R/MF minimum lot area per dwelling unit for multi-family
structures is 1,250 square feet per l-bedroom unit and 2,100
square feet per 2-bedroom unit. The applicant's GMP
amendment proposal states that the projeet will contain 16
l-bedroom units and one 2-bedroom unit. Thus,
16 x 1,250 = 20,000
1 x 2,100 = 2,100
22,100 square feet for the 17 units.
The applieant's p~oject has only 21,602 square feet of land,
violating Seetion 24-3.4 and making the project land unsuitable
for subdivision under Seetion 20~9(e).
J. . Muller
JDMec
.
,....
,....
Pielstick & Associates, Architects
520 E. Cooper Allenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Tel, 303' 925 -1666
Alice Davis, Planner
Aspen/Pitkin County Planninq Office
Aspen City Rall
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
January 14, 1982
Pe"'l' Alice;
I am writing to you on behalf of George and Joan Anderman, for
whom I am working, to express aome concerns about the 500 South
Galena Street Project which is presently under review by your
office and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Anderman's property is an immediately adjacent property
located along the East side of the Cantrup Property. The
proximity of the Anderman Residence can be identified on the
Applicant's Topographic. Property and Improvement Survey by
noting the corner of the balcony shown on that drawing located
at the top right corner of the sheet between the 116.0 and 117.0
point elevations.
The following is a listing of concerns which we feel are
relevant to this project and whiCh should he addressed by the
Applicant, the Planning Office, the Planning and 7.oning
Commission and the City Council during their consideration of
this submittal. A more detailed discussion of each concern
is attached hereto under the title 500 South Galena _ Concerns.
Item 1 - The potential for injury to the Anderman's property by
the proposed project is extreme and a potential for endangering
the safety of the public is great due to the undermining of the
adjacent property by an excavation cut that will approximate 34
feet right on the property line.
Item 2 - There exist sufficient grounds to suspect that
signicant hazards may exist with regard to topography, geology,
and hydrology that the Applicant should be required by the City
to submit substantiating data prior to approval.
Item 3 - There are questions about the adequacy of 26 parking
spaces on this site as it is proposed fat development which
warrant a more indepth look and further information.
c
,....
,...,
r.G-4 -
Alice Oavis, 1/14/82, pag@ 2
Item 4 _ The calculation of the Floor Area Ratio and the Open
Space percentaqe from the drawings submitted 1s of questionable
accuracy and sufficiently difficult to call these calculations
into question, since both floor area and open space are close to
the maximu~ allowable.
Item 5 - The building as proposed appears to eKceed the height
limitations set forth in the Aspen Cod.
Item 6 - It appears that the slope reduction formula required by
the Aspen Code was not applied in calculating the density
allowable. The Applicant states in his submission that, ~The
site is flat- yet his survey indicates that portions of the site
exceed 100% slopes.
Item 7 - The time schedule for review and approval is being
rushed to accommodate the Applicant who has had in excess of
three years since the Conceptual Approval granted with the
Growth Management Plan allocation was received. The Preliminary
Plat application was submitted in November of 1981 with
information which just barely meets the minimum required by
code, it: it does that. The applicant expects to obtain
preliminary and final plat approval a so that he may obtain a
building permit prior to a Februllry " 1982 deadline. We feel
the information submitted is insufficient for a proper review
and approval because significllnt inadequacies exist.
Item 8 - The written submittal indicates that roof top Bolar
collectors will be used while none are shown on the drawings
submitted.
We ask that the planning Office, the Planning llnd Zoninq
Commisaion, and the City Council look carefully at each of the
items listed above and review the attached pages prior to
granting approval. We ask also thllt this correspondence be made
a part of the official record of the SOO SOuth Galena Street
Project review.
1y,
/~
RUSSELL A. PtELSTICK, ARCHITECT
,-"
,-"
rU4 -
500 South Galena Street - Concerns
George and Joan Ande~an
prepared by
pielatick , Associates, Architects
520 E. Cooper Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 8161t
Item 1 - The Andermans residence is located just off the East
line and to the South end of the East property line of the
property proposed for development by H. B. C. Investments. The
drawing submitted indicate that at the Southeast corner of the
Cantrup property the natural grade is about 117.2 feet above
reference elevation 0.0 feet. The mechanical room floor at that
corner of the proposed building is at 84.0 feet which would
indicate a retaining wall of approximately 34 feet height. The
retaininq wall once in place moat assuredly can he designed to
support the loads imposed by the steep natural slope which
supports the footing under the Anderman's residence. ~owever,
the process of constructing a property line retaining wall of
that height must include a vertical cut of 34 feet into the soil
which is not yet retained by the wall whiCh will eventually be
placed. The possibility of that cut being totally vertical
and the possibility of the Boils under the Anderman residence
remaining stable throughout the excavation and construction of
the wall seem small. Some discussion of the soil stabilil!lation
techniques, the sheet piling methods to be used, the assurances,
the insurances, and liabilities envolved should be included in
the submittal for this application. We would feel that the
minimum should include a topographic survey, a detailed soil
analysis, and a structural proposal for the adjacent slope,
soils, and construction methods along with the agreements on
liability, insurance, and penalties for damage to the Anderman's
property, We have conflicting reports available at this time.
The Andermans have a geologists report which states the existence
of a hazard while Cantrup group has a letter from an engineer
stating that there is no problem. We tend to believe our
report.
Item 2 - The steep topography on the Cantrup property and the
properties up the hill to the East (where the tram climbs the
hill and under the Andermans house), the historic slide areas
along the base of Aspen MOuntain, the varying nature of the soils
(alluvial sediments, mining slag, bedrock outcroppings, clays,
gravel, and organic pockets), the presence of a surfacing stream
near the Tipple Lodge, and the natural drainage of the
mountainside all point to a high probability that one or more or
a combination of some or all of the topographic, geologic, and
hydrologic features are present which represent a hazard. Wh~n
these natural features are combined with insensitive and careless
placement ot structures the problems multiply at an alarming
rate. We feel that the care, time, and study necessary to assure
that all possibilitien, all contingencies, and all options have
been carefully considered and that the best
,....
~
~~~
500 South Galena Street - Concerns
page 2
solution to minimize the insults to the natural site, avoid the
multiplication of problems, or provide suffieient guards for men
and there structures should be taken. It is within the power of
the City under Section 20-12. (k) of the Aspen Municipal Code to
request such information ann we feel that this site warrants such
a request.
Item 3 - In early 1976 the Continental Inn through its owner of
record Hans B. Cantrup entered into an agreement with June Allen
Moss Cantrup the owner of the property now proposed for
development which restricted that parcel of land by a -perpetual
right to use an area ninety feet wide by one hundred and eighty
feet long along the North end of the restricted parcels for the
parking of ten standard si~ed automobiles: said parking to be
used by the party of the second part, The Inn, its invitees or
guests". The restricted parcel which is now proposed for
development was to "remain restricted until such time that the
ten legal parking spaces are legally transferred back onto The
Inn or another adjacent parcel to The Inn or until the
off-street parking requirements of The Inn by the City of Aspen
i8 reduced at least ten spaces." We can find no record of these
conditions having been ~et. The parking requirements for the
proposed structure by the zoning code is l/bedroom and 4/1000
square teet of other uses. These reguirements using the figures
shown on the applicants plan would mean 11 at l/bedroom and assuming
that none of the other uses require parking we have a grand total of
27 spaces. That is the 10 in the restriction running with the parcel
plus the 11 proposed for the proposed construction. The plan
submitted shows columns in the parking area at 2S'-6ft centera which
will only allow two cars between columns rather than the three shown
which reduces the number of cars to 22 rather than the 29 shown in
the plan. In addition the submittal indicstes an intended future
submittal for 5 more employee units under an R.B.O. submittal which
would indicate a grand total of 32 required space after the future
submittal.
Item 4
This ite~ is self explanatory.
Item 5 Since the natural undisturbed ground line is not
indicated on the elevation drawings it is impossible with the
information submitted to accurately measure building height.
Further, the attempt we made to measure height at the Southerly
most unitof the west Elevation where the grade elevation 100'
crosses the building line seems to indicate that the building is
over the 28' height limit.
Item 6 - The applicants submittal states, -The site is flatft yet
the survey submitted shows that portions ot the site exceed 100%
slopes. Section 24-8.18 of the Aspen Municiapal Code it appears
should have been applied to this project to reduce the density,
at least subsection (cl. The site has been excavated since the
initial application and the excavation may have been done to
,.... ,..., ~*~
-
500 South Galenil Street - Concerns page 3
limit ", amount of land falling under Section 24-8.18 (e).
Item 7 - This iteM 1s self explanatory.
Item 8 - Although solar collectors are considered mechanical
equipment, Aspen Code limits the penetration of the mechanical
equipment to 5' above the maximum height, therefore, the
collectors should be shown so that the height may be checked.
-
'""
-
'"'
CONDOMINIUM RENTAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
747SOOtt1GaI.....Str~
Aspen,CoIorar;o8161!
130319<'5-2200
ManagongAgMtfOf
. FaS(:hir>Q H>iu. . F~!M A",*"~
. AlpOObl>d< oTiwelM&lO;1ge
J~nuary 14, 1982
City Council and
Planning Office
Cltyof Aspoo
130 S. Galena Street
Aspel1,C081611
JAN 1819?Z
ASPEN J PITKIN CO
\:l.ANN1NG OFfICE
RE: Preliminary Plat Application
7,99,5. Gal~na __.:.. ~
LotI6,ParcelB,
Block 2, Anthony Acres
DearSlrs,
We manage several condominium complexes in the area described
above. A reasonable ntl/ltlerofourcondominiLrnowners have
expressed concern over the future of vacant land in our dn!.L
Specific<llly, they look to the delays encountered in bul1ding
the Aspen Inn (the foundation sat as a parthlly-cOf1structed
site for 2-3 years with associated construttlon materials)
and the congestion from construction workers, pedestrian
traffic and traffic flow being impeded by inadequate attention
by City street crews or the private developer.
I
I
Our owners do not object to aproperconstructionperiod,but
definitely do not want to have a 2,3, or 4.year construction
and storage site in their neighborhood.
I
Any OI'1sideration
,
SinerelY'Jr:
l~
leel.Miller
Manager
-
that you can help with will be appreciated.
llM/rp
cc: G.aryPlumley
I
--
./
,
.~.
.,-"
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Alice Davis, Planning Office
RE: 700 S. Galena Street - Preliminary Plat - PublIc Hearing
DATE: January 13, 1982
Location:
Zoning:
Parcel Size:
ApplIcant's
Request:
Engineering
Department:
Buil di ng
Department:
Attorney's
Comments:
Planning Office
Revi.ew:
Lot 16 and Parcel B, Block 2, Anthony Acres Subdivision;
700 South Galena Street
L-2
21,602 square feet
The applicant, H.B.C. Investments, i.s requesting prelIminary
plat approval for the 700 S. Galena Street project as part of
the suhdilli sion process.. The applicant receilled approval for
amendments made to thts 1978 residential GMP application along
with conceptual subdillision approllal from P & Z on December 11,
1981 and from City Council on December 14, 1981.
After a site inspection and a review of the application, the
Engi.neering Department's only comment was that the applicant
~ust obtain any necessary easements from the previous property
owner as the property's dellelopment plan calls for the con-
struction of terrace level improvements, walkways and retaining
walls which will encroach upon these easements.
The Building Department found the project to be in compliance
with the floor area ratio and heig~t requirements of the Code.
The City Attorney clarified that the easements found on the
preliminary plat. are not public easements but are interests
dedicated in the property deed by the previous owner for his
personal use. The interests in these easements can and should
he obtained by the applicant from the prellious owner since the
project's construction is to encroach upon these easements.
The 700 S. Galena Street project consists of 16 free market
units and one employee unit totaling 21,595 square feet of
floor area on a 21,602 square foot parcel (99.97% buiM"out).
The proposed project Is to have 26 .underground parking spaces.
AccordIng to a parking ag.reement which runs with the property
deed, a 90 foot by 100 foot parcel on the nortb end .of the subject
property must be reserlled for park.ingto accommodate ten
standard-sIzed automohi.les. This reserYed parking is part of
a 19]6 agreement prollIding the necessary parking for the
Continental Inn. The parkIng must be reserYed at 700 S.
Galena unti.l a time when the ten parking spaces are legally
transferred back to the Inn or another adjacent parcel to the
Inn or unti.l the off-street parking required of the Inn by the
City of Aspen is reduced at least ten spaces. In light of this
agreement, the 26 proposed underground spaces will accommodate
the ten spaces to he reserved, but only provide 16 of the
necessary 17 spaces for the 1] proposed units. The app 1 i cant
must either obtain specIal reviewapprollal to eliminate one of
the required parking spaces or add an additIonal space and
provide 27 underground parking spaces. The applicant has
indicated a wIll ingness to provide the 27 spaces rather than
request any variance from the code requirement.
Duri.ng the conceptual subdIlIision review the Planning and
Zoning Commission expressed an interest in requiring a com-
pletion schedule for the proposed project to assure that it is
.~
'-',
Memo: 700 S. Galena Street - Preliminary Pl at - Pub 1 i c Heari ng
Page Two
January 13, 1982
constructed in a timely manner. Section 7-141 of the Aspen
Municipal Code amends the UnHorm Building Code to include the
followin9 requirements on building permit expiration whic;h
could be instrumental in requiring a completion schedule.
1. The work authorized by a bui.ldi.ng permit must corrunence
within 120 days from the date of issuance of the permit
or the permit be(;omes null and void.
2. Work equal to 10% of the evaluation of the entire project
must be completed in each 60 day period after work corrunences
until the project is completed or the permit expires.
3. If a permit expires, the following provisions shall apply:
a) All below grade. excavation shall be filled within 30
days of e)(piration in order to bring the si. te to a con-
dition comparable to that before permit issuance.
b) Any protective structures placed in the right of way
as well as all' hazardous conditions must be removed
within 10 days of permit expiration.
c) Before work can recorrnnence, a new permit must be
obtained.
d) No permit shall be reissued for any construction or
activity prohibited by law at the time of the applicac
tion for reissuance.
4. Whenever practical dHficul ties or unnecessary hardshi ps
occur in meeting thi.s section of the Code, the Board of
Appeals "may vary or modify the application of this section
so that the intent and purpose of the Code is still
obse.rved.
The Planning and Zoning Corrunission also requested that the
applicant illustrate how the prop,osed project will work wi.th
and without an RBO as the applicant may submit an RBO applica-
tion at some time i.n the future. The applicant has stated
that if an"" RB.D js requested and approved there wi 11 be
an additional five units in the project. With the additional
units included there will be three levels, each approximately
ten feet high. Without the addi.tional RBO units there will
be two stories, each approximately 14 feet high.
The applicant has met several of the conditions of conceptual
submission approval as the access to the parking garage as
well as an accessible trash area has been properly indicated
in the preliminary plat. The applicant should be required to
meet all of the obligations corrunitted to in the .amended 1978
GMP application.
Planning Office
Recorrnnendation: The Planning OffIce recorrnnends that the Planning and Zoning
Corrunissi.on grant approval to the preliminary plat for the
]00 South Galena Street project subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant must obtain the necessary easements from
the previous property owner i.n the areas where proje.ct
construction encroaches upon these easements.
2. The applicant must provide" 27 underground parking spaces
in order to comply w.ith the 1976 Continental Inn parking
agreement and the parking requirements of Section 24-4.5
of the Code. The 10 spaces reserved as part of the
Continental Inn agreement must be legally transferred from
the north end of the subject property to the underground
fad 1 ity.
"......,
r~
Memo: 700 S. Galena - Preliminary Plat - Publi.c Hearing
Page Three
January 13, 1982
3. The applicant must clearly indicate in the site design
how the southeast corner of the property which is in
excess of a 40% slope, will be graded and/or retained.
4. Prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy, the
applicant must fulfill all ooligations that he committed
to in the complete, amended application including, but
not 1 imited to the fo 11 owi ng:
a) 27% of the site shall be retained as open space;
b) Drainage control facilities shall be provided on
the site, including a series of dry wells, retention
wells, and a planted diversion berm;
c) Energy features shall be incorporated in the building,
including solar collectors for hot water heating,
energy efficient fireplaces, and insulation exceed-
ing regulated standards;
d) Social facilities shall be provided within the
project, including a child care center, recycling
facilities and an indoor/outdoor pool;
e) Site design shall be as shown in the amended applica-
tion using a three story straight line configuration
which will maximize solar utilization;
f) Sidewalks shall be constructed along S. Galena
Street;
g) Elevators and stairs shall be provided to serve the
three stories from the parking garage;
h) Site and building design shall permit unobstructed
movement for wheel chair confined or other handi~
capped persons;
i) The twelve employee uni ts at 925 Durant (part of
this joint application) must be deed restricted to
low income housing and a certificate of occupancy
issued prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy
on the units at 700 S. Galena;
j) All other obligations not listed above but established
i.n the complete amended application for 700 S. Galena
shall be provided;
k) Pri or to i.ssuance of a buil ding permit, the plans
shall be submi.ttedto the Planning Office for con-
firmation of their consistency with the amended
GMP application, as approved by P & Z and City
Counci 1.
5. The applicant recognizes that preliminary plat approval
does not signify any acceptance, nor create any reliance,
upon a subsequent RBO on other applications.
6. Construction on the 700 S. Galena Street Project must
start as early i.n the Spring of 1982 as the soils allow
and the applicant must agree to the completion schedule
found in Section J,"14l of the Munici.pal Code. This
schedule indicates that ten percent of the total evalua-
tion of the project must be completed each 60 days.
..~.
.~
~,
-.,
MEMOMNDUM
TO:
Aliee Davis, Planning Office
Jay Hammond, Assistant City Engineer~
FROM:
DATE:
.Tanuary 7, 1982
RE:
700 South Galena Preliminary Plat, Lot 16 and Parcel
B, Bloek 2
Having reviewed the above application, and made a site inspection,
the Engineering Department has the following eomments:
1. One concern raised by this department at the conceptual
stage was that of the steep slope in the southeast corner of the
pareel. We were, at that time, assured that the topographie survey
was out of date and the applieant would supply a new survey indieating
some changes in the slope. The new topo is ineluded in the current
application and it still shows a significant area to the southeast
in excess of 40% slope. Under Section 24-8.18 this area (comprising
1,050 sq. ft.) should be eliminated from the pareel for purposes
of density caleulations.
In addition, inspeetion of the site would seem to indieate that
the applicant has undertaken eonsiderable grading in an attempt
to reduee the area of steep slopes on the site. While it is
our opinion that the applicant should be held to slope reductions
based on the old (1975) topo ineluded with the conceptual
applieation, it is not clear at this time whether the applicant
had an on-site exeavation permit from the Building Department.
At a minimum the applicant should be required to follow slope
reduetion requirements based on the new topo.
It should further be noted that we reeeived a letter from a
geoteehnieal consultant expressing eoncern over the existing eut
slope. Clearly, the applicant can not over-excavate beyond the
property line for the purpose of building a retaining wall without
the approval of adjaeent landowners. Dr. George Anderman, the
owner of Lot 4 of the Tipplewood, has already expressed concern
based on the letter from his soils eonsultant.
2. A second item raised by this offiee at the conceptual
level was that of existing utility easements on the pareel. The
development plan calls for construction of terrace level improvements
as well as walkways and retaining walls into utility easements on
three (3) sides of the property. While the only utilities eurrently
oceupying these easements include an overhead power line along the
"1,:.-
~.
-.,
Page 2
January 7/ 19132
700 South Galena Preliminary Plat, Lot 16 and Parcel B, Bloek 2
easterly boundary and a gas line erossing the northwest eorner
of the parcel, and for whatever reason these easements may have
been ereated, they remain an important potential link between
parcels to the east and southeast and Galena Street. We would
recommend that owners on these adjacent pareels be clearly
informed that their future ability to access Galena Street for
any utility service could be jeopardized by the proposed
development plan.
JHleo
."
~
--.
crTY OF ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
ALICE DAVIS-PLANNING
JIM MARKALlINAS
700 SOUTH GALENA STREET PROJECT-PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 6, 1982
We have again reviewed the project to be located at 700 S. Galena and have no
additional comment to make in regards to the water supply, oth~r than those
made at the previous submittal in 1978. It was noted that the project would
provide for a fire hydrant to be located at the intersection of Galena and
Dean Streets, or as indicated in the application, on-site.
Provided that the applicant still intends to install a fire hydrant as stated
under Paragraph DD: Fire Protection, we have no problem with this project.
~
-,
-,-
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: 700 South Galena Street - Preliminary Plat
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the
Aspen Planning and Zoning COllUnission on Tuesday, January 19, 1982 at a meeting
to begin at 5:00 p.m. in the City Counci.l Chambers, CHy Hall, 130 S. Galena,
Aspen, to consider the Preliminary Plat application for 700. S. Galena (formerly
known as 500 S. Galena) located at lot 16 and parcel B, block 2, Anthony Acres
Subdi vi s ion, Aspen. The appl i cants, Hans and June Cantr.up, are propos ing
to build 16 one-bedroom free market units and one employee unit. The project
was awarded an allotment in the 1978 residential GMP and recently received
approval from CHy Council for amendments to the proposal. For further informa-
'tion, contact the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, 925-2020, ext. 227.
sl Olof Hedstrom
Cnairman, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
I
l
I
I
City of Aspen Account
Published i.n the Aspen TiJlles on .December 24, 1981
.
.
.
."
u
.,
SOIL" FOUNDATION
ENGINEERING
~"
~
~<'-;o-~(."
,'.'" " ".~
; a :1
\':~:;
~
5080 RD. 154 . GLENWOOO SPRINGS. COLORADO 81601 . 303/945-7458
Job N:>. 23,317
chen and associates. inc.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
roIL k\,;1) Fa;~"\.TIO:~ 5T"vJY
FOR PKO?OSm C:::Ni:::a.u::;rl.,.l DEVEWP:.:=:-r.
700 s.::u:;, G.'IT FX\. AS?~, CO:.DR-,::j)
jP//r:.:
Preparod For:
H.B.C. Investnents
450 s. Galena, Suite 202
Aspen, m 81611
~~ 18, 1981
.
.
.
,
/
1"'"'\.
TABLE or m::'L.\'rs
COOCWSICWS
SX)PE
proPOSED CUlSI'FVC!'ICW
-SITE m'IDITIQ,S
SUBSOIL CDNDITIO:\S
FCX.JNDATIO~ RJ:lXl-ll'lENDATla;5
EARI'H RErAINING S'I'RJcrtJRES
lJ:'.;1)ERDR;u::.; S Y57!::-\
FI.lX)R SU>-.BS
S.,RF1\CE DRi'.D;;GE
LlMITATIili5
FIGURE 1 - ILCATIo."\5 OF EX?.wR:;~DRY BY 0:-0:;
FIGURE 2 - ILGS OF EXPIDPATORY tiOIES
FIGJRES 3&4 - s\-iErL-<XJt;SOLID:'{l'ION 'I'EST ?2SUL'I'S
FIQJRE 5 - G."lAffiTION TEST RESG"LT
.TABLE I - SL't1oARY OF IJIroRATClRY ltSI' ?::SL"LT
,-"
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
9
:'0
.
.
.
~
~
CD:-01.JSlmS
(1) The subsoil conditio."1S encountered at the site consist of a variable
depth of fill overlying a canbination of clays ar1d gravels.
Subsurface seepage .....as noted at a depth of approx:i.rrutely 11 feet b
lble 5 drilled in the southeast ccrner of the pLU~y.
(2) 7he ?::q::o&."Cl structure should be founded on spread footings placed
0:1 the natural CXJa.rse granular subsoils a."rl designed for a r.axi:IT..::::1
soil beuri.."1g ?ressure of 6000 psf. R..oc::m:e."rled desig:J. a.'1d co:lStr..:ction
c2tails ?resented in t.'1e tody of t.'lls re;;:ort should be obse...rved.
(3)
Co:-lsir:nri!1g t.'1e required e.xcavatio..~ depth of U? to 38 fc.€t. to
2.c.~e\te rxp:JseC. lo.-.er floor level a"1d p~rty l.ine ronstructic::.,
a tt;~_~r~~~~.i.~~ ~~_~?-_~~__~...E~2d. Close Frc:-:.i.rJty of
r,xd':..,:ays, St.r'.xt'-a-0S a"",d hills~de slor;es, S:ooc:.lld te c:)."'lside::-cd i.-:
the t.",.~rary s:-D.::ing a'1d final retaining SLru::tlL'-eS. Cxerpir--:ir:c;
of adjacent buildings MaY be required. A c:::I:Frehensive ~-x;ineering
design for roth teqxJrary a'1d perrrar.ent ear-...h retaining structures
is reu:.".=1ded. 'I11e final design s..1-nuld be revie;..'ed U.I a geot.ectnic~l
engineer .
(4) ~ underdrain system should be f>~_~~_t.t!p~..hY~:3t.ati,?
pressure b.1i.ldup behind retai.ni.n:J structures and protect t.'1e 10"^",r
,..p-'_..... .. ' -'.'.-"'" "'-"-" - ...
:level against wett.irlg,-~~~ de'Natering system will probably
-....-,'-", ,... -. .~_. _..__......._...... ,. .-.--., ___m . .... ,....... .. '.._'m_ .......,,_
be required during construction.
~.
~
SOJ?E
TIllS rep:>rt presents the results ef a soil and foundation study fer
the prop:>sed conda:liniur:1 develQ~t to be located at 700 South Galena,
.:...s?2--'1, Co~_orado. The pr-oject site is sh..~"n on Figure 1. 'l'1ris rer:ort
;..as been pr8p:.1reC to sL.;r:'a=ize t.he d.J.ta Obt..1.L-~ed a.rd p::.-esent our conclusions
and desig:1 recaa:errlations ~-u on t..:'1e coXitior....s e...'1counteroo. Rccor.t:e..'"1c.cd
cesl.gn pa.::::"a':Etc.rs a."1d discussion 0: gcc~"'Ct"4"1ical engineering ronsiderations
~ela'ted to t..'1e oo!;.str.J.ction 0: the prcp:;s-x. facility are i...'1cluded.
~)::D?:ISED OJ~'"'TR..OI():'~
T:n:-z p=o;cs..:...~ CXJ:-,da:-ir..il....-:i ce~,relo~';.t ~..."i.ll cs:;.sist 0: a si.''1g1e
lY..:ild.i.~g cor:pl2..~ CCr:.tai...'1.L'"1g 15 to 20~,',:elli:1S" u.-_:.::.s, 3..."1 tz:Ge~g::-ou::d
~k.i1"';;; a::-c.a c;..~~ recrC3.~c:1al ~;.itics. ,.-.....,p :~::il.it~" '....ill esse::tiallv
~J
cx::cc.p::, t..~e er:tire lot. Pr21i."":1i.r.a.T}' bt:ildi.."1g ?laas i.. '"1d.icat.e cc!"'..siderable
cut depth ","ill l::€ required to ac.1U.eve 10'...'2r floor levels be::-M2e."l 74 and
78 feet elevatibn (site datt.""7!). BaSEd en t.'1ese finished floor elevatior.s,
cut depths will typically range fran 12 feet to 38 feet l::€law existing
grade. The l:xlilding construction will consist of a 10'.= concrete
structure SUHX'rting 'MXrl fra'fe with l1'ason...ry veneer building u:uts. The
below grourrl parking will extern t.:rrler the east half of the building.
Structural SUi::::art for the building ill this area will be provided by
relatively heavily loaded collIli'.s. A11 outdoor pool and sundeck area is
p.lm1ned for the lower level be~ the ~st side of the building and a
high retaining wall. Elevators a:1d stairwells are to be provided at 3
locations within the building.
.
~
~
If loadings, grading plans or other condition:; arc sic:nificantly
difft2rcnt fra:1 t:J"osc dcscrilx..-J abo~.."0, ~ s~J..:)uld l::€ noti fic'<.i t.o re-
evaluate the rC'Cu",en..iations contained in t.."is :-e;::crt.
SITi: CONDITIO~:S
The site is located on Gale.'1a Str0'2t a::ot:= l7S fc-et S0~~'; 0: X.J...i
Street in A.s?:-n, Colorado.. 7he pr~t.ies .J:e de.sc:::-~-.c as l...o~ 1.6,
Block 2 of t..'1e P.:1thJny Acres Sul::.di~:isio~ c.;'"C 5.:x:}.( 3,J4, ~a:;e 597,
Clerk a"'1d P.ecorder. To t.t:e sout..lJ. 2..'1d .....'C:st 0: t.:~e slte, t.~e :::...::'':'s:.c.-:: ::s
:airly heavily develo;xrl.
1':: ?ical
c.djz.::e.~-::: (X):,.s:::c::-tiC:1 co:;.sist.s
~. '
s-:.o::::)! multi-t=1it condo.:::i.'1i:....."":"S ....'ith IJ.'.~ ga=a:;c 2.e,:els..
,. ,
:.... S:--d-~ '.',"CX:X;.
:ra'r7'e buildi.r~ p~esently aXJ.sts L": tr.c ::-:c:-t..:.-p~~t C(.;.::7.C::- 0: ~.'2 ?=:)lx:::-~~
To~rarhic relief across L"":e site
.:..s
1...-,....:::':Y"":.:O->......
_......~ ~,";:..........c....... ~
:':::2 ~:-ajo~it~.
~.
~.
the site is ge.'1tly sloping cn a:-~ :::.;p-;.~c,;.:.i.;a-:.e I <; :::-a~ ~;l,':6rd to ~>.0
south.. A steep cut slope exists .L'l. t..'-1e s.'X.."'"t:.:'.e2St co~s:::" c: tr.e site
with grades of approxi.'rately 75% a..u height 0: 20 feet .,;it:u.... t:!:-.e lot.
Relatively steep grades exist on the adjoir.i-'1g proper+--ics to t..'1e east
and south. Primary drainage across the site is fr= soutrr,,'l2st to' xrt.'1east.
'I'h= rrajority of the site is oovered in weeds and grasses ...ib
several srrall aspen trees along the eastern side of the site. 111=e viaS
approxiIrately 6 inches of 5rlCM on the site at the tilTE of drilling. NortIT.-.>2st
and central p::lrtions of t.'1e site have been graded a'1d covered with
gravel. 'Ibis area has apparently been used for parking. Irrlications of
the presence of a significant depth of fill are visible on the site.
o
Problems associated with slOflE! stability and subsurface seepage are
k;no..n to have existed on the adjacent lot directly upslOflE! of the subject
site.
~
,-.
-,~-
SUBSOIL Cl:NJITIONS
A total of 5 soil torings ~e nude ...i.th a 4 inch dia;reter continuous
flight auger at tJ1€ locations indicated in Figure 1. Graphic logs of
the soil profiles encountered are ?reSc.11tcd in ;:-igure 2. Distcrbcd and
~~~~VLly urdisturbed sa."PI~ of_ t.l-Je soil_!;__en(~'::Il1t..,red _~t?_~8:'"1_Eor
re-..iew by t.'1e project 8."1gincer a"1c lal:oratory testing. The results of
---.-"".-.-..,."
laJ::o:::ato:ry testing including i....,-si tu rroisture and de11si ty, gradation
3.r'..alysis, L'1de.x pr:-ope...Yties, unconii..."'l......~ cx::Gpression, -a'1d. s..x:?ll-corl.solidation
testL~g a.:re presented in Fig-;..U:'es 3 ti"~o"Cg~ 5 and s~ized in Table -:-
'7-he s'J.bsoil conditions e::cx)i,.lnt~e:: across ~1C site CD:,-sist 0: 2.
v3.riable d2pt..~ 0:: fill overlying a c::r'b:':'2.t.:.:::n of c':<3.::'s a.'1d gr2.~,.'2ls.
~'1e fill material ronsists ?rir.'Ta.rily 0-:: o=ganic clays rri>:~ ....-:..:...~ g:::-avels
a"1d silty sarcs.
In.:oc..::::iO:1 ce.ri'l.s--d at &e test [-DIes ....as
-~~
.~~
su=:ic:.e..'1t
tJ de'te.l7..:ne tr.c CCl."'1di tion or e.x::.e.::t 0= the fill rr.aterial.
r-:'....~
....!t.:::
r;.2 tu=al
clays enrountered beloN t.he fill are stiff arri contain occasic:1.21 gravelly
a"1d sandy regions. 'Ir.ese soils e;.-.r..:bit rrc.de.rat.e settl,r.Cl'1t tc:xle...,::;ies
a"1d "ould support only light fcu:xJ.ation loadings. Gravels ccnta.irung
cobbles and p::lssible toulde:::s -..x;:::e 8.'1rountered at depths varying frcr.l 17
to 26 feet and extended to t.l-Je r.Bxirru"n depth. drilled, 34 feet. T'nese
gravels tend to be r:-ediun dense to dense and p::lssess relatively gcx:x1
rearing capacity.
Subsurface sc~e was rot.ed in .~ _drilli:!19 of Ible 5 between
depths of 11 and 13 feet. upon a:;r.pletion of the drilling, free water
level was measured at a depth of 20 feet. After 9 days, the water level
..-..J
waS rreasured at a depth of 23 feet. No ','3.ter was encountered in !bles I
throuqh 4.
-
-.,
-5-
FCUND.'\TION RElXUlDIDATIO$
Based on the subsoil ccnditions encountered, ProFOsed excavation
dept..l-Js and the relatively high loads associated with the prq;osed type
of amstruction, spread footings placed e:1tirely on the natural o:>arse
._"'-,--~.~
granular subsoils appear llOst suitable for sllpfOrt. Si11ce profX'sed
---..... -_'_'"._-_.,~,-,- ---_.,.."--,.,_.~-
lower floor elevations are aJ:ove t..'1e gravel layer in TIDst areas, a ?ad
and STade beaIn type systerr. r..:.y prove rrost feasible. The follO\,-L'1S
desig:1 and ccnsL--uc+'J.on details sOOuld be observed:
(1) Spread footiIlgS s.tould be placed on the natural =arse gran:.:.la.=
subsoils belo.'>l all clays or fill ...hic.'1 may be present 0:1 the si::e
and designed for a maxi:::un soil bearing pressure of 6000 psf.
Foundation bea..ring elevations can be ass..:::e::i at a !:'irJ..I'C".=T, of 1 f=t
i.'1to the gravels. SettlenEl1ts are. estimated to be apprcxL....-ately ~
inch wtal and 3/4 inch differe.'11:.ial. ros1: seule:r:e'1'CS srould
occur at the ~-re of construction.
(2) The depth to gravels was found to vary 5ignificantly ret:v:ee.'1 test
IDles and sOOuld be considered in the design. Any local loose or
disturbed soils ~ at footing grade sOOuld be r=ved and the
footings extended to UA'p"tent bearing soils. A representative of
the soil engineer slDuld observe cx:np1eted excavations to verify
suitable bear4 cx:n:litions.
(3) Spread footings placed on the natural granular subsoils slPuld have
a mi.ni.nun di.mension of 16 inches for walls and 24 inches for =1=.
.
(4) eontimDus fouOOation Io.alls slDuld be reinforced top and botton to
span local ancrt\3.lies.
1"""\
-.,
-b-
(S) E;.....tct we [uotlJl<.]S or fo.:>tl.l1,:!S plaCL."\i lJ) un.'1mtEd ill"C.3S S;)')~_L.i L1c
provi<.lo::i ~ith I3n adc<JUatc soil rover ab,:)vc tJlcir tcar.-ing f'lc\7ation
for frost protection.
(6) The lateral resistance of spread fcotine; foundatior-:s placed 0:1 tl:c
natural subsoils ....'ill 1:x? a eu:-biI1.ation of passive ea..."'t'1 ~ressure
a~ sliding frictio:1.
Sli~~ friction at L~ botto~ 0: ~,c
footings can b2 taken as 0.45 tL7CS the vertical dee:: load. Passive
pressure against t...~ side of the rooti."1gs C3...'1 be calculated [;0..:'
using an eq:'..llvalc."1t fluid '...eight o~ 350 pc:. ,S:lc~=ill ?laccC.
agai!l.st th3
fo:.rxlation to resist
": ......k.~..-;:l, 1,.-...,""::-
......0.._.................. ....'-"'....--.""
&1o~ld be a ~o~e~~~L~31ve
rraterial cc!!r-pa.cted to a r.'.i.'"12...;.~ c: 95'S of t..\;:e r:-ax..:....--::,:: st2-.-~?.....c
Procter der.si t~/ .
T:r-e a1:ove desiS1 ~"1datic.-'lS a=e t..ased 4'":C:1 ~-:c c:-::x:.'C:.(.>'"i ::.:Ji:':::i:-~g
a'1d gracing pla:-.s as discussed herei...-,. rllt.c=:-.::te bcil::.i::S c:::::;:;~-,~i:::,.
r.--ay. c."1ar~e at1d CJntradict t.~se ~r..ations. ..:..r~~~tiO:'.al O:::1sult.:.tic:1
a-rl design revie.... is reccr.tIla"1ded prior to construction.
EA.'1TH RE::'AINr:G SI'F1JCI'URES
At prop:>sed lower floor levels, excavation depths between a.':x;Jut 12
feet on the northern end to as nuch as 38 feet on the southern c.~ bela.';
adjace....lt ground surface will be required. Excavation to near the pwperty
line is proposed in nost areas. Considering t.he depth of excavation am
lateral constraints, (limited area for flattening excavation faces) tmpJrary
sroring will probably be required to_~2r:::,.;n excavation slo;;e stability.
'Ihe design of t:eIrp:lrary shoring as well as penranent retaining structures
,
V
will d~ rot ooly on the sul:'6oil an:l backfill conditions oot also the
t:yp; of sySta:l and rret.h::xi of installation. I'Je expect t:.r.at shoring
-
-..--.-
,--
-.,
--'----~
(' ')
. ~,
\-oi thin lcw retaining heig.'1t of arout 12 feet or less can be a ca.'1tilevered
~~,.~tcrn.
Forgrea~ depths, a braced or tied bad< &ystem would probably
-.---
, - - -"--"-"'-----"'-~.-.. --_. ,",-----_.._--
be required.
Often asscciated with terTp:lrary s.luring is gro\Z1d subsidence of the
adjacent :::-eta.i.ned slope due to slight lateral \vall !"OVellent. \\here t.'>c
excavation is located adjacent to less critical st..'UCtures such as
paverre.'1t areas, the result..L'1g settlenent is usually v.i.thin tolerable
lir:tits.. ta"'~~...Ter, .....7le.r"e buildi."1GS are located wit..'ti.n a,b:)ut 1 1/2 ti.-:'Cs
the retained height, the settlE:..r:e.'1t could cause st..'"UCtural da.-;-age.
Steeply sloping terrain uphill of the sheri.,,''!g systes or advcYse s~il
cor..ditior..s suc.'-l as loose dt~~""'is ::i11 or see:;:::ase ca., also cause e.:':cessivc
mJ'\ter.ent. To :-.i..tigate tr..e5e rorilitions, ;..~ reo:r:r:'er~ a t.rorough ir:\,rest:.gatio:-1
of crl€ r:er.:L.--:eter site oorrditions re r:-r.-4P to evaluate t..'leir i...;;:act 0:1 the
required retai.r.i...'1g system.
iJnderpiming of adja=t building f01.::x.at.:.O:1S
___..1...J ....__ _..............~.;_~ .;_ ..,~.4';~';__ ....-. -._ ..,.... .... __........... ....~ ~i,....,..-., r"i-v-._~....,... ~r<""""'",,,"""
'-'-'~...... ~ ...'-"':1.................... .....~ ~'-4......~~ ......., ......... ........ ..... ~............. ......_ o"J-~_.............'"'=' ....~.............-...
CXlce t.J,e tentative excavation plan and adjacent site =ilitions have
teen determined, """ should be notified to provi.de reviE:'.v and rec:cx:r.e.'1ded
earth pressures for the final design. A qualified engineer a.l'lC/or
ccntractor sf).)uld~_E'm<Jaged to des;ign and install t.'1e required sroring.
Building fourrlation a.'1d other walls acting as retaining structures
should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures. 'Ibese walls
v
should also be designed to resist surcharge loading as described atove
such as inp:)sed 1:1.1 sloping backfill, adjacent OOilding fourdations or
vehicular traffic 00 roadways. Backfill should ccnsist e.r:~X of
relatively free draining gran1l1'lrmate.r"i-,,1_ carpacted to a minim.Jm of 90%
------.~, ''''-.-..--.
of standard Proctor density. 'Ibis type backfill will reduce the! design
!""'\
!""'\
C'22-t::.__,~_':- ';'_S.?~=-~__,~~ ~__~d l (,,'\>."
~:'~:1,~~ Sllbsurf .3("\"_ s::: 'I~~~?:
latc~(J.J
such .:13 e:1CD:"':"i.b.."?:-0d in Ible -' ..:1: tJ^lC :;,:.),-:t..l!(~lst '..:o:"11Cr of tl1C lot.
r'8r
grCLi.ulor b.:::.c..~f ill c.'~~ing
. -- '
!X.:._:':':1;.1
t.:",~ '.....::.:1
a rnr.i.'7L.-:': lCli:clal
dist..an,,;c
of 1/3 tn2 \.\all height 2nd ha~:i~0 a IX)s.:.tivc slope a"hUY f::~a:l t..~ stl-......ct:.rrc
a mini..:::L..-:'1 clisu;ce c'(f...:al to t..~ ',,"Jll 1:e:i:;ht, n. lat.e.:-al ca:-t.."1 ;.:;ress"Jrc 0:
45 psf ;x::.r [co=- c: dept.h ca:-. tx? as~1.Z7cc:.
rugher lateral ~~~ r~essurcs
v".ill ~ r0::fciree :01:' \::L_--':'~}; xc.'.zfill co:1.dit.io:'.s or hiS-!l ;:,0ilji:~0 ::i:;idi <:y
anCl
CC".,~
'w.....;........
r.:L-~2
~~
~
a ::-ax.l.:;-...z:-.
~.
~-
uX,.~t
SJ
~......;;,-
per =CO~
~"
":,'.,,....,....h
.....--::-'.........
.:"..;:1.::.i t..:..:.-:12.:
.:-cccr-r:-C"'1datiQ::5 c:l..'1 :::e provic.oe. c:-;.:;s
::.(;.;:t.ati\-:"2 b:..:..i:"i:L---:::
. .
2.:';:';' s-r.:.~g
p."l.a-5 .~..~ :.:E€". c:s::c::::-.i:-..ee..
:"-:~;~2?..::...r:: S':;.";:,...;:;':
~;:.::;. wt2r s:.'C~ce \0;23 Q:"".::C:"::-::2;.cC :........~ ~:cl~ ~ at 3.~.:-o).:.r~,J.':.e (;c:?t...~
"
~~
::0 2.3
:r?~'2t ~
Frc'€ "..;ate::-
r-;:::,.,.
&'L.o..:
llso
~~
c:-:.c():':"'1t.s.::-':.c
:;::--2a::.e~
ex::;..;:;:::::. ~':'C':-l
dc~~.s .
Q:':;si.::'21:"ir'.g t....~e ::-'elz:~i\&ej.~' CC'C? ?r::~s'x cx;::'::".-2.~c:1 dc~-:'.':-'$, t..~e
c.::mtra::7--c= s:-Duld re pr-e?'11:'ee. to L""'-Stall a te:;:orar.l ce/;3.te.-in:; sys-:e:-..
The reqpi .....cd S]ste:l sr-.culd tE> plaC'C."d to interC:2:Jt SCC'?CSe e5fx:.--ci..ally
frcn C:.:."..ca\tation faces ar.d Givert t.:--:e water v.':.t..i-n~ adv-ersel.y' e:fc-::ti:tg
the rer:'ainder of th-2 e.xcavation. ;\;.'1 tZ'.dcrd1:'ain. syst..e;'. should also tc
provided to protect the stn.;cture 2gair.st wetting a"ld prevent r.ydros::a.tic
pressure build'.:p l:Jeh:ind retainbg sL-ucturcs.
The drain sh::Juld =nsist
of a r:erforated pipe installed in free draining gravel placed at least 4
foot beloN lONCSt: adjacc.'1t grade and sloped:m a rr:i.nir.un 1% grade !O
suitable outlet.
A drywell 5'jste:~ extencLinq i_n!e_.t.he. ~l:1:il}gX~l~t,iv.9ly
. ,
-...../
clean gravels r:ey J:c feasible hI' ~is~sill of grouoo water~:::."B<]e.
Depending on the seepage =.litions c-J1oo'-'J1tered in ~ e.xcavation,
interior lateral drains IT<"1Y alS0 be rt'luin'Cl.
.~
~
-9-
FUXlR SLI\l3S
The natural subsoils relow all topsoil and fill sh?uld be capable
of sup;x>rting lightly loaded floor slabs. 'Ib reduce darrage due to slight
differential slab rrove::ent, nonst.ructural floor slabs should be separated
fran beJring =bers with control joints and adequately reinforced. II
r:ti.n.i= 4-inc.'l f.ree draining gravel layer should be provided beneatl'.
interior floor slabs. Required bac.l<fill sh?uld oo:15ist of n011ex-pa."1Si'
granular soils carpac'"...ed to a rninim....'"1l of 95% of stanCard Proctor de:'1.sity
at a noisture cont€nt near optirr:4--n.
-.j
SUR?";cE DR'UX;GE
'Ihe follo...>ir:-g drainage p::=ecat:ticns s.'x?uld be observe::: curing
oonst.ruction a.."ld ::-air:t.ained at all ti.':ES after t.'1e building has been
c:=leL"<l:
(1) Excessive wetti.""lg or dryi..""lg of t.l-Je foundation eY.cavation shou::';:: be
avoided duri..""lg construction. Surface diversion should be provided
upslope of.the e.xcavation.
(2) Hiscella"1eOus backfill around the buildi.""lg sh?uld be noist€ned a:'.Q
<::cr.1pacted to at least 90% of standard Pr=tor density. Areas of
deep backfill smuld be crnpacted to a rninirrun of 95% of starrlJrd
ProctOr density.
(3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building soould
be sloped to drain O!Nay fran the Wilding in all directions. .I'my
walls backfilled ...'ith free drainirq material sh?uld be caprcl with
relatively inpervious soil such as the ct'l~ite clays to reduce
lIOisture infiltration.
(4) /b:}f dow!1srX)Uts and drains should di scharge well beyond tJ~ limi ts
of all backfill.
~
"
,
,-
_.'
s\,.~t 11..':
F cd
~
-~
1"'"'\
r"
.'
-----,
: I
EXi~ting~ :
,
1 Story: :
I\ood St ructurc: :
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
, I
I :
I I
I 1
'-- ~
!lolc
.
1101e ::
.
..
\
/
~
lIole 3
.
. ------~
C:::" U".~ ~_
~... .8 uS
Lot 16
~
"'''
4
v
Hole 5
.
*23.317
I.OCH!O'>;S OF 1\I'IORXWlll IkH IS
\
lot 3
'to
~J'
I~O
,~r
Lot 4
""
II"
'.i.:. 1
~
a
hi
....
'"
'.
,...
9
Vl
~.
-
>:
."
-
b
S;
..,
o
""
-<
i5
en
..,.
~
C<
7'
Q
-
:;.
(
'"
o
I I
'"
'"
..,
o
1f
"
'"
11.1.\',\1 Jil\
"
:f
'J!
t I
~~ff1i?~ "' "~ " " "' " 2J" "' "' " "~
.' . . .~ .. '- '":r- '- " ,'- ,,-,, , 1
".
'n
"-
-
,~
-'
",
-
-'
I.'
1
~
I,
. ."
..-.n1"i
..,-0
,<"'''0
~<o
jooI'~ Vl
ri"(')
'4 ~. 0..
_0
-..;,:::I"':"l
I/>
'"
'n
"-
o -
~
~
~
ID
"-
....
N
ilJ ID
0-
o
'"
'"
I
'""
t"
~
on:?:
,., '" 0
n <:
!") <tl s:
1:1 '"
0-0....
" " l":l
'1"0 '1
M
- :J"$.
0-. './l c=
'"
.....:::1 "
IDo.:l
'" n
-:r. 0
'" C
M'"
,., M
'1 ,.,
'1
,.,
,., 0.
0<
,.,
I/>
~ 0-
'1 ,.,
" I/>
n
".-
,.,
n ...
,...:r
,., '1
0.0
'"""O"J
::: ::1'"
o ,t,.
,., rl
:n
'" rl
".
;:j g
0.
a
V1 ........
a 0.
" '1
-.
-t
0)
"Om
'1 .-
a "
< .-:
". '"
0. ...
,., ".
o.a
"
'"
'"
U1
,., "
" ..
"
."
,.... ~
",,-0
.-0
'1
_0
~><
".
:1
"
rl
n
'"
"
0.
rl
::T
,.,
-.
"
-t
"-
'"
N
N
"-
-
I~
j.J..J
'""
l~
~
'"
-
~
n
0.'"
". ,.,
'" '"
!3 !"'t
,.,
...".
" a
'1 -
,.,
n '"
a
:l ~
rl "
". '1
'" ,.,
-
o 0.
C '1
:n
-
....-
-~
1-'- ,,_
"
,.,
'1
n
"
'fl
"
Cr':'l
~g
"00
o "
>: n
" ,.,
'1 ;;l
r:r
'" ,.,
- '1
0-"::
rtl 1.
'1
,.
:l
c.
~
rl
"
,~
.,
-,
'1
o
Cl
';:)
en
"
".
...
n
o
"
"
c
r:
'1
,^
-,
"
~
o
"
..,
-,
-.
OJ
n
"
"
'"
o
"-
I,
"
~Io
'.
'"
I.
"-
10
'"
'.
I,
"
'"
"-
...
N
I~
"-
'"
'?'
,-'
en
to
,.
~.,
c
"-
c
...
......
'"
S!'
'"
"-
'"
..,.
'"
"-
..,.
I...
'"
'"
...
.....
t~
I
5
".~.-,._~,,,,,.t..:.J
,,:
:J
......
..,.
to
ID
'"
HIVAT ION - FEET
7:
o
-l
m
U1
~
o
"
"
...
".
OJ
...
".
,.,.
".
n
".
o
"
n
'"
-
n
0.
"1
'II ID
U1
(1)
,.,
"::J
'"
""
"
0.0
'1 ,.,
_.'0
-...
-".
" '"
00'"
::.1 ~
" I'
..., ....
(f, '-,
C ".
" .....
~J '1
fj ~
,.,
rl
"
". .,
_ rl
'J' ()
'1
...
W ,::
,.,..,
" '"
-c::::T
'Jl ~ c:
., '"
~_o.
""0 j;.......
-01/>
" ...
'1"d C
o '1
-cr:r
fj ~ f'tI
0.0.
"".0
(j ~ "'i
::r;3 .....
r':l:J or-:
'ft to /'l;l
'1
U1
....~
'" E1
-'0
..... ()
" .
'P
~
n
a
-
:;
...
(1)
'1
"
~"
1..11 -I
C ::1-
"
".
:;j 1ft
n .,
::>'3
" 0-
'.II 0
".
" tn
'1 '
,.,
,.
"
c..
'1
" ".
gc:.
...... ......
'1 r,
() ~~
0....
.,
....'" 'f.
fi
-:r
"
..,
o
a
c.. ...
'1 .,
". rl
-
() O?
-,
0.
.,
.<
'fl
... 0-
OJ'
" ~
...
..,
'1
'.'
"-
~fmm~~.
a ::;'l
o '1
"'ll>
I/> ..,
... (1)
-
r:r~
'1 C'1
0(')
"'~
::i
'.,
...
"
~
_::;'l
;;. ;.;
:::r<
... ,."
-:
0-
'1-,
9 ~
-
,,~
'fi
'"
:l
0.
'0<
'"
-
0.
'<
n
~,
-
.,
'-;
,.,
'0<
...
".
r,
o
0-
0-
,.,
'"
n
o
0-
0-
,.,
'"
>:
5
0.
0-
o
C
~
rl
:r
a
n
,.,
.,
'f,
~,
g
.,
"
'1
'J'
"
"
0.
-.
~
'J>
.,
"
0.
::..
..,
'f,
.,
,.,
::>
:n
"
'j'.
a
o
'f,
M
8 ~
'" 0>
'" ~
... ,.;
-~
.....'~
l'J"':l;::::
.".,
rtC";
.."
cr~
'1 .
o
1'. ',Jl
"
c:.
"<
'" (')
... -
....t,)
........,.
.....
. ~
~
:I c-.:
0-'
", .
'"
... '"
~.
3'n
" ".
0....
'J>
". -
C":
3
'f.
0":"-
- -
d Co
". "
;:; .
::.
r.
".
...
'j", ....
-
'<
'" 0
". r.
... n
-0>
.< '/'I
'"
...
',""
r, 0
~ :J
-"
('; -
"
'0
,.) ;1
g ..-:
'J; ")
'-
...
::>'
r.
o
0"
0-
"
OJ,
E1
?-
".
-
;;
c..
"
::>
'/'I
"
r. "":""l
~.
.,
'r
'f.
"
'"
r:
g
..,
0<
"
'f.
ro
:>
c..
'n
~
-
..,
'<
r.
'"
'-;
>:
....
".
.-;
"
v'
a
-.
::..
.,
..,
'-
,....
0-
,.,
-
'J,
"
'f
C
".
:>
3
2-
a
r!.
r.
"
=
f
"
,-."
...,
'.J\ r",
?)
I' :::
-c-
\ :::"
~r:- -
,-."
~":
,-."
~
i
C
~
"
~
.'
. ;
"'-'"
R 2 ~, 7, 1 -
......1--
i I
, ,
, I
-----l-- '
I
I
v .
0\
.~. (nen ;IlHl ;;,,",Ol.'t:lll."., l~.
I
,
I !
I !
.t--t-
i ! i i 1
,
, I
'II!
I...L
" i I
i I! I J
I
,. <.',.".
,"',,"" ."
: ',;'~(pnl
.....,.'.
;-'.j;:"';:- - i I : ~
. ,1 :.~ ," ".
,,"i,I:'
i:,"
! ~,\ : . .
.. ""',"!
0'
\
"
-,-~.-
!\'~~':ll):131 :v-l':ii"'('Sf"Cil',
iur1l~('r JO:1Stl:::-:j );('h:-;~l:;i'
. . '." ",,!,' ,-..'" ....: ~ ...., I ;
I I 1 i
i
i
I
-----I-
v
ov
APPliED PRESSURE - ksf
~,'~"'.;:~'t: c~; :e:.: .
;:er::e:",t
::>..... ",-: ...._:;,,:
,'>
::ct
::;,?.....,~'.~ c'
:;:. ~ .. : > ....
rro......,
, C'.s: : ;,' 1 c
., :.CC:
i I
: I
! i
, 0 10
AFPliED PRESSURE .- ks!
100
S\'."'U -CO'J',()I.iDATION TEST HESUL TS
FIe;
.'
,.
.
" 0
"
0 1
'"
'"
Q
'"
c.. 2
E
:5
:;
4
5
6
u
it;3~317
~l'n and ~ls"on;\tl's. me. ~
.J
.
,
,
,
I
I
! 1,..- ,'_~-~:,~-.: 15.6
I 1-'" l" """9'1. 111.) 9
I 1 jl:::,FY\, '" (>1 sandy gravelly clay
--....---t-.-.,:--
i l
[ Ii '. i i: : : It! I;..''''''''' lest Ho.l(.~ ,~ at 9 ft.'t"t
Iii i' I
---+-J-t--H :
tN-LUX 111111111 ,Illi
'I I ' ,)Ti,._____! I I ! I II i i jl i I i I !
Il':!i~~ll:!ill I III
i ! .,::\ N ttiJli I!:! Iii:
I:', ;;: : !'\I:r!~: 1 i Ii;:
, I ! If' ! I 'I ' iAdditfunal t0l:1rr~5$ilon'
1 ' ! ' I I l, I ~ ' ,
, ' i , ! ! I under qonstlmt, pTC$~re
, : I i I ! !due to "ett'n~!. ' : '
" I j i 1 . '
l ' : I' -; l 1: .
I ' i ~!
. I' i, I . j ,
~! 'I' ;,1;
; i I I ! ~ ; J
.---,.-~-~--.... ....----
I ~; !'
;'(""'::-;;
r.d
1
,
,
!
, ,
,
, i
.
, ,
,
,
. !
,
,
,
j
j
i ,
! i
I !
I
,
i i
i !
! i I
I
,
I
,
,
! i
,
I I I
,
i .
!
,
, I ;
i I
, j
! ! ! .
,
, , ,
, ,
I I
I
: 1 ,
, 1
. 1
, ,
I i
! ;
, ,
I ! ;
!
i i !
, '
, I
I
I
!
I
:, I
, !' I ;:1
Iii i i i
i i I I! i
, I j I:
I
, :
, .
: :
;. :
I :
I i
I ! I
: 1'1
. . ! I I
! Iii'
: , I
I I! il
! . ,..
I!
:, ,
.
I
i
i
. j
j
!
i i I I' ,
i Ii!!
till
I I:
If! .
, I
I ,
I
I
I
-1-
- .1
"'
0.1
I~ 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - lis!
100
swn.t .r:ON<;OlID"T\O~, Fe; r RFSIlL TS
~
F;q
~
1"'""'\.
.."'hf;; :l;~{: ~~'...<,nr::~t~H,.. lrlr.
-,------
I
.' .
.' .- - '.+:,- ~ i .~- - . -.......". - ".-
~
'-- -, -,~._~ . , -
~. .._- .-----+-- .. . _. "-"'---
=~-+ ~.
+--. ~~ -
~-- -~.._~. ---.,.- , ,_.
-r--t -+- --
-~~ -
-- .- . -......
-- .
,
~~ -~ - I -~
, . -- -. t -~:. -.- ............-. -,
--- --.--- -
- .- - ." -T-" ._--::~~~--:
f- - .' - ., --
- .- - . - -. --
_._..~ -
- -'-"~
. -- ~
t:,.. , I
'- -
-+- _.-... ,- i i I
E - - , I -- t ,
- . i - - --'...........-- ,~
I --."..-----. , . ,
"
<
"
.
. .~-;:-~~
~
,-I
i -
.,:::::'
~::; ,- ..
:
c.
,...'-". " -'.
; '.;"::-- ~ .....,... ...
..
.~. '.' '. ~ ... "
~ ':,."
- .-~
i
I
---+
:=J
=-. --..; .:. ....~ ~ " ';
~. -;...-
'.l-~,
d
.
- -'-'" -
-~ ~
,
,
.
,
, .
, ,
,;Iv) ..~2 00") om G1jj ..- '.1.'4 "49 ;"i:;r I "0 , " ,. 4 i6 9:'2 '" "" ~6 2 '" ..
'.
.
,
,
<
.
,
z
z
= .
cN'-d
.
y
'"
,
lC
--"
~
,-,.4.} 1e
[;'AM::TER OF PPHiClE 11',1 Mllll~ETERS
,
cun 10 ~IL l
"
"fOIt,;'"
CGAPSf
GR""f.l
fiNE CCAF!';E
COU!lfS
"....~o
37
SAND 2 9
..
..
Sll T A~D CLAY
26
...
...
........,(
GPA\lEl 45
...
uQJ(D i.lM!"f
P( ASTI(:ITY INDO. 14
~,'\MPlf I);;:
"J.ltv ,~'ln..l: \.'L\\,cl
i'f.:<'YM
Test lIol{' 5 at 10 feet
; I ..
" l: ;\ r ~ i;..
'r ......;,
~ I; T C,',
Ffi)
5
,.". ~
r'~
-
".
.~
0'
CIJ
W
~
<
o
o
CIJ
CIJ
<
>-
c:::
o
W f-
..J
m <t:
< c:::
~ 0
co
<t:
..J
o
z
"C
z
W
::t
o
Ii
"
!I
II
Ii
<
"
,
~.
,.
(/)
f-
..J
;:)
(/)
w
a:
;1 _'''';l.i
II ~i I: =1
I ~ J,:r'
I '11
Hf~
Ii d I
,
i: :i i
'I
!,,'I n~- i
~ ...~v. "
.....f :xc..
il ~e~-!; !
f-
(/)
W
f-
,
; ~ i ;: "
if ~ Iv::,";-:
'I ... ;;:cec-,;_,
Ii ! r~~~!.-.
11 -' I;" ,
" g~~
Ii (6! "
i. :r iO...
~ ;~~~,: ?:;
j...l- ' ,
I
I
;
j %~8~ 1
I ~ViN~
j :re'l.-;:
( ~:i"
, _l
: -.:;i
': !
;i i
u..
o
,
n C_ \;
I z;;. "
~ ~- il
,~.. Ii
~ ...l Ii
~~ Ilj
c-
o
i
lj'
J ,.
.. ~-
--~-~~u
~Ql!:~
>-
a:
<s:
~
~
::)
en
~~~
c:;),w-
::>~I-o!
..._z_
..00
Z~"
z
o
;:
..
"
9
w
It
~
..
~
"'-
~~
..w
WW
o.!>
W
J
o
r
~~ '<-
1""\
1T i T'TT-j
>i
:-:1
, I
-j \.1 I
:::, I;:;hl
::-.J '-'-'
-1 ',"!.,
I'"
-~1
I':~i -( rJ
,,,! b~1
.." I ~1'::: I
.~
1-:: ;;..
1::: '-
I "I;;
r;: ;;:.
T I
I
I
i j I IIi
: i I' Ig r:
I ('oJ
I IN
. I
-! -, T
! ! !
. ; ,
i)
1~1
I
I
,
I
! ,
i
,
I
\ -:-.l 1
I '
1 ) l
I :
I' =1
' i "'I
:
'"
~ - 1
Lf'lf_::" ......
I'- 0:::
C.
0:::
I'-
-
01'-
a.N
- N
0>
...
CIa.
- -
- N t'J ~
~_ ~l__~ '- _
'r-T-II-TTTiTl
I 1 ' 1 , \ , 1 ; I'
'! . i ! i I I II
; I! i! I!
! I I ! I i II
I I it III
1 I I
,
.~
~]-r_..l-T'T" -r--Tl'-' '-1
I -.' :,' : i
I " ~j l:' t !
~i I ~ j I
\ ..., l :.~. I
, -,,~, ~"l .
1_< J.....,t
i Ii I II I
I
I
!
i
I i
I I
II
1 :;1
i
! i I I I
I I I I I
I j i 1\
T 1 i T I
I I I' , I
I I I I
I i I I I
\11
I . I
! I
II
, I
I I 1
I I I
II !
I !
I 1 1
I I
\ . I !
, I I II
! i
, . 1 I'
, , '
1 :
I I
I 1 I
!I U
I ~.
! !
1 l
i I, I'
i '
jl ! III
; i l
I ! I ,
I I
! i i
,
,
! I
;j
'"
~ -
!
.. "~""1u ....
,
...
C
-
'"
.
VI
-
a.
o
-
VI
I , I I
I ' I I
i I, I
1 I I
; II
i . li
1 i II
i ! !
I I
I
j
,
j
, I
i '
, I
i i
t !
Ii
:1
II
p
II
"
i \1
d
;;
"
I ! I i
! 1
III
. I .
I , I
i I
I I
, I
ji
I I
I I
I
,"
~.
,.-,
GARfiELD & HECHT
SPENCER F. SCHIFFER
KATHERINE HENDRICKS
(ADMITTED IN MASSACHUSETTS ONLY)
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
VICTORIAN SQUARE BUILDING
601 EAST HYMAN AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
RONALD GARFIELD
ANDREW V. HECHT
December 17, 1981
TELEPHONE
(303) 925-1936
TELECOPIER
(303) 925-3008
CABLE ADDRESS
"GARHEC"
HAND DELIVERED
~1r. Alan Richman
Assistant Planning Director
City of Aspen
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: 500 South Galena/Subsivision Application
Dear Alan:
In accordance with our tele?hone conversation this
morning and mv conversation yesterday with Alice Davis, enelosed
D,lease find a eheek in the amount of $139.00 as the an", plieation
". . -
fee together with four eopies eaeh of sketeh plans showing adjac-
ent land holdings for the anplieant and vegetation for the referenced
projeet. I understand that this now completes the preliminary plat
submission.
SFS/pp
enclosure
Thank you for your cooperation.
Verv ,;1U1Y yours,
GARF;r~LD & HECHT
iF,,"r
,IV
~
,~
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 south galena street
aspen, co lor a d 0,81611
,
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney
Dan McArtnur, City Engineer Department
Jim Markalunas, City Water Department
Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation ~
Bill McDaniel, Mountain Bell
John Spangler, HolY Cross ElectrIc
Herb Paddock, Bui.lding Department
Willard Clapper, Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
and City of Aspen Fire Chief
FROM: Alice Davis, Planning Offi.ce
RE: 700 South Galena Street Project - Preliminary Plat
)< DATE: December 17, 1981
Attached is the PrelimInary Plat applIcation for 700 S. Galena Street (formerly
known as the 500 South Galena Street Project) located at lot 16 and parcel B,
block 2, Anthony Acres Subdivision, Aspen. Hans and June Cantrup are proposing
to build 16 one-bedroom free market units and one employee unit. This i.s
. an application which won an allotment in the 1978 .resIdential competHIon.
The application was recently amended and received approval from the City
Council. Please revi.ew and return comments to me no later than Thursday,
January 7, 1982. These item is scheduled for a public. hearing at City P & Z
on January 19, 1982.
Thanks for your assistance.
--rHlf ('IZOI'O.f,.,." bev...~<>p,..,.e....r ~"'$ A"'''''~'''' -,........ "..
..'" ~ ~,...,1"....f'..Q~
5/;1"-"'1<-'- p..'f rHr: AS't'p.... .A....,.,....'.- 11>".>,.11.,,;-.
~
4- sP;~ SJ:\'--l:rltr/a_ l\tsr.ie.eLi""
/'( A,.. IlI-'P- ""-
.
.
',.......
'~
t
,-.
,~
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 south galena street
aspen, colorado.81611
,.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney
Dan McArthur, City Engineer Department
Jim Markalunas, City Water Department
Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation
Bill McDaniel, Mountain Bell
John Spangler, Holy Cross Electri.c
Herb Paddock, Building Department
Willard Clapper, Rocky Mountain Natural GasV-
and City of Aspen Fi,re Chief
FROM: Alice Davis, Planning Offi,ce
RE: 700 South Galena Street Project - Prelimi.nary Plat
DATE: December 17, 1981
;x
.
Attached is the Preliminary Plat application for 700 S. Galena Street (formerly
knO\~n as the 500 South Galena Street Project) located at lot 16 and parcel S,
block 2, Anthony Acres Subdivision, Aspen. Hans and June Cantrup are proposi.ng
to build 16 one-bedroom free market units and one employee unit. This is
.. an application which won an allotment in the 1978 resi.dential c(ll1lpetition.
The appli.cation was recently amended and received approval from the City -
Council. Please revi.ew and return comments to me no later than Thursday,
January], 1982. These item is scheduled for a pub.li.c.hearing at City P & Z
on January 19, 1982. '
. ;r;z"' :;:".. tJ::tx ~~.
'%-wd/ fiJ ~a-/./0 ~j ~
f~N~
.
.
~. SPECIAL MEETING l~
, . ;..'
,. December 11, .1981
. MEMORANDUM
,
~
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Alice Davis, Planning Office
RE: ./560 S. Galena Street Project - Amendment to 1978 Residential GMP
Application - Public Hearing
'DATE: December 10, 1981
Location:
Zoning:
Parcel Size:
Applicant's
Request:
City Attorney:
'.
Lot 16 and Parcel a, Block 2, Anthony Acres Subdivision;
500 S. Galena~treet
L-2
21,600 square feet
The applicant, H.B.C. Investments, is requesting approval of
amendments proposed to the approved 1978 Resi dentia 1,GMP
application for the '500 S; Galena Street Project./ City- .
Council recently adopted, on your recommendation; revisions
to Section 24-11. 7 (b) of the Code concerni ngamenaments to
approved GMP projects. This new section reqUires that if an
applicant who has previo1.ls1y been awarded a development
allotment deviates from any essential element of his proposal,
fails to satisfy any materia] condition imposed or fails to
comply with the development schedule, the Planning and Zoning
Commissi.on must recommend to Counci.l whether all or any part
of .the allotment should be rescinded. This application
represents the first projest to jnvp~e this new review
process. If the amended app] i cation does not change the ,..",
allotment, conceptual subdivision review should be considered
for the amended application at this ~ime.
The City Attorney commented that the amendments to the GMP
app ltcation shall be reviewed through the standards of Secti on
24-11.7 (b) of the Code to determine if the changes are deemed
substantIal. If the changes are substantia] the amended appl ica-
tIon should be reviewed.to determine if the original score in
the 19]8 GMP competition should be adjusted or if the deVelop-
ment allocation should or should not be partially or fully
rescinded.
Comparison of
Proposed Amend-
mentS & Ori gina]
GMP Application: After a thorough review and comparison of the 500 S. Galena
Street 1978 Residential GMP applicati.on and the current amend-
ments to this application, the following items are given as the
.major changes to the 1978 application. The Planning and Zoning
Commission should consider these items in determining if there
is a substantial change in the GMP application and whether or
not all or any part of the allotment given in 1978 (16 free
market units and 1 employee unit) shou.ld be rescinded.
Number/Size
. of Uriits:
, '.11;<."
T 6t<1} fSqua r'i!'
Footage:
, ' " ~
1978 GMP
Application
1.- 16 one-bedroomunHs at
1,000-] ,20([ sq. ft. and
1 studio employee unit at
600:Slf.ft, ..... . ..
.". .t
'2. 18,500sq .ft,,;85%ofthe
allowed 21,600 sq. ft.
under F.A.R.
1981-82 Amended
Application
1;-13 one-bedroom units at
'1-,310 sq. ft. ;,3 one-bedrooms
, ~tJ,1.40 sq. ft. ,and. 1, :.two-
6ri;l:edroomemployee unit at
800 sq. ft.
; .2;ir2Q,,450sq. ft.;, 94%oji';$e c,
allowed 21,600 sq. ft. under
F.A.R.
. .
.F
~.
~
~.
Memo: 500 S. Galena Street Project
Page Two
December 10, 1981
;i
Pub 1 fc
Services:
4. Parking: 17 parking spaces, 4. Parking: 26 underground
10 of which are underground spaces
.
5. Energy: Project design will
maximize. solar utilization
and minimize heat loss;
insulation exceeding regula-
ntor.y'standards; :
,-....,.........,.;~: ,-"..._,"-- .-
'Stte Design~--~'~""6~
"t"'shaped,2
configurati on
degrees. .
5. Energy: solar collectors
.. for domestic hot-water heating....
as well as electric energy;
.cproject design willmaJlAmize
::-::so] ar utH i zati on and mi nimizer2~c2.,'
heat loss; insulation,exceedi~:::,
regulatory standards; efficient>,:,,,'
fireplace design inclUding heat.
return ducting.
level-stacked . 6.... Strai ghtl i ne, - 3s.tory-conf'i g'-" __h
canted 30-.nuration.. .co'.. ""2""
.
,-,-29r'.::;:;;:s~
~;"':::'::"-.,,-
Sod a 1
Facilities:
7. Child care center ,and
. recyc 1 i ng fad li ty.
7.. Indoor/outdoor pool, child
-_c~.s:are, J;enter and recycl ing
. facH ity
Engineering
Depa rtmen t :
The Engineering Department had the following comments regarding
the amendments to the 1978 GMP application:
1. The applicant must obtain necessary easements from uti.lity..
companies 'where the project's construction encrouches upon
these easements. The. app li cant.mustbe n;sponsi b Ie fqr any .
'i.:requi red rerouti ng ohutil it i eseliesulting from j;he use, bft:i-e~ n,s:
the easements. ."~ .
.,
~:'.:::q ,
'~".'-,'-"~
.
..2,.The parking facility,' a. de-fin;ite advantage. to the, a1!lendedw,
application, must be appropriatelY designed to handle'-";'~'
the difficult grades and the acute angfe at.the in.tersection
with S. Galena Street.
\
/
In addition to the above comments..regarding the Gt1P amendment,
the Engineering Office made the following comments regarding
conceptual subdivision review of the amended application:
1. The conceptual plan's topographical map indicates an
area in excess of 30% slope in the southeast corner of the
parcel. The site design should clearly indicate how this
area will be graded and/or retained.
2. A multi-family project of this size should incorporate
an easily accessible trash area into the site design.
Planning Office
Review: The amended application should be reviewed.todet-ermine-if
there has.been substantial change to the original 1978 applica-
tion. If P & Z finds that there is substantial change, then
the application should be rescored in the areas affected by
'n ..... the amendments. These areas have beenidentHied by the" -:"!"''C:'',':
.Planning Offi ceto include 1) panking,design and 2 ) energy. .;:;;;".,;;" u.
... "h.~.. ...., The othera:reas'of'change, thesHe~design, architecture,'" ~ .' "._AM .
. - -- . . indoor/outdoor pool and increase in floor area do not fall' c' c ,. .
within a 19J8 scoring catego.r.)',,"""
... ..-..,.. The Planning Off.i ce feels that,.tbe;'propos~d amendments..to';,theL:.l:c, '"
;:":; c,,; 19i78GMRapp licait:ron,pr.:olli'rleal ~ill':ls tll1fft~l:l~; Ide'lltat;i;ofl( based'; GO tut;.ittoritj
the standards] in Sectiqn. ;24-11 tl\~b~~~iEtemH );cThe 'major1.11,;
'changesinc1 udethe: addition otlill.ngarkingJ spaces,'and.jan '.on
F. underg.roundparkinggar.age:to. accElIlII!!odate . ~6;'~ns1;el:ld','of;.:1(jh"i>';"'~::11"':(E":
yehicles. The additional parking spaces have been added to
.. service additional units the appl htant eventually hDpes to,:;,,, c..'
Memo: 500 S.
Page Three
December 10,
.
~".
t~;~i:
o
~ ~'i;r,;.i.:.:i,,~ ";::':
J
t'~;,r~;, "'
1a)'j(~,;
r"\
r"\.
Galena Street Project
1981
construct through an RBO submission. The buildable area has
been increased from 18,500 square feet to 20,450 square feet
asa result of the larger unHs proposed. The structure
is now a three story instead .of a two story building. There
-.- have been no proposed changeSo"rega.r"di:n9,..the._numberc-of,unjts~,:"":~,~,,.T~'_~'O,' .'_
- water, sewer and storm drainage. facilities, fireandpoH~e.
protections, road and public~~~~ns~ortatiOQ~e
All of the changes provideeHheran improvement or are"ofh~.
a nature that they would not,have affected.the appHcant's'i~'
score or position relative to .other applicants. Attached "h.,..,
are the tally sheets with the scoring for all seven residential
GMPappHcations for 1978--(J,t,emnZ}" ,.lhe,.l.978..PlClnl)ing Of-Uce'.
scoring recornmendatiOhs.;'Plaflning and Zoning; Commission scores
and the Council chahgesresu1tl-n!:j+from GMP 'appealsare'a.lh",,,. f-Y't1.'" 'Eo'"
,J:..cgiven. Parki ng design"ecei~i'21_poi'Ah ,o,ti a;c'PJ'lSisib'Le.ce3',!'OPI!!.;){), nl;:';'"
the Planning Office, 2.8 points from P & Z and remained 2.8
after Council appeals. Energy received 3 poi nts from the
Planning Office, 2.8 points. from"P& Z and was increased to
3 points by Counci.I. J ,"U.., "
The Planning Office recommends that parking be increased to
3 points due to the additional~parking spaces and improved
underground parking facility, Energy should remain at 3. No
other scoring categories are.,affected by the proposed amend-
ments. Therefore, since the amendments' only result in an
increase in points, the applicant's de'lelopment allocation"'
should. remain and his position in relation to other applicants
does not change. acee !!:.;., ..
It is important to note that in 1978, a project had to receive
60% of the total points awarcied (39 points) to qualify for a
" de'lelopment all oca ti (m; ,N6 1Q'J<;€Ij,eli;,j;'besJ <i!es ..those..awal'1dec!r@!iI;,f.>.C;t.w:sjd;
allocation (Top of Mill - 26 units, Park Central West - 10 units
and 500S. Galena/925 S. Durant - 29 units) received 60% and
therefore would not be eligible for. an allocation. (Items 3
and 4, P & Z and Council ResQlutions)
A copy of all recorded app Ii cati on materials on the seven
'projects in the 1978 GMP competHion will be available at the
P & Z meeting friday, December 11, 1981. Information on
these projects is gillen in Item 5, the P & Zmtnutes on the
1978 GMP scoring.
P & Z gave conceptual approllal to the 1978 application for
500 S. Galena. If P & Z approves the amendments to this
application, then the amended application should.aho .be
gillen conceptual subdi vts ion appro.lla 1.
Planning Office
Recommendation: The Planning Office recommends that the Planning and Zoning
Commission recommend to City Council the approval of the amend-,
,,," , ments to the 1978 GMP appIicatton for 500 S. Galena,Street,i:\l. ,,;; _"-
stated in the app 1 i cati on supmitted November 2, 1981 as we 1 Las " _
s;.;r,';-2;;;:. ~.::;~ibHb";',,'conceptual subdivisi onapprO'la,l',cboth .subject:. to. ,thec:to},lQ\liins.o tn silb
condi ti ons:
> ":""",~':"",'.,,,:,.;
'\-"',r".-~". ...
.1., Theappli cant, mustobtain;neceSsClry.;ea:iements ;frQI1!:. ;.:, ;'..:,:,-
util Hy companies where project constructiolJwilT_,;__
~, . ent\iloa(;hPi:!.pon(;thes.a;easements"(c)T,Iae:happ~,j'CiV'\'t$l!!u~Jisb~2n t s .
,. respo$lsfbZle . flilJi-i anj" lI'equiredrt'erol}~til\'9cofcu.tijJ;i't fes;:;;
restlilUlQg, from, the use of the"eillSeJllen.t$'",;::: of the
2. The parkingfcicilttY'must"be"'approptiatelydesigned,to;
handle the diffi cult grade.s and .tbeacute angle '.at ttie_
intersection with S. Galena Street. ; ".,1,:
/'.
1",
(.,-
,,-,'';>-.''1,', _"J-
,,' ~. .,....> ~.;.;. .
_..:,A
.
....'-y
...........
tS@f.lTh"r-' 'j f s
r: \.;
,.,:~ -
.r'\
r'\
MemQ~__600 S. Galena Street Proj.e.ct
Page Four
December 10, 1981
.
-""-"-,-,,,-,~-
<j;.._--,-,---"""~~",,:,,,--",~
: ',.,;",,''''.',
,..l ~ _.' '".... '"" ~ \;.." ,;...... .... .1.-
3. The applicant must clearly indicate in the-'site-desigrr
how the southeast corner of the property which is in '.
excess of a 30% slope, will be graded and/or retained.
4. An easily accessible trash area must be incorporated
into the site design.
5. Prior to obtaining a~ertificate.of occupal'lcy",-:r:l;he ce;:cif~
aPpli cartt {llust f.ulJttl'a:Jl obligations. that' he ',cflli1li1i tted
to in the complete, amended application-lncluding, btlt'not..~, ,
limited ~o thefo 1 lowing :
a) The"parking plan including 26 underground parking
spaces.; 0 . . ---.' ---
_:i\.,,,,
b}!WiH:nage control facilities
dry wells, 'r.etenti;Qn wall s ,
berm;
i.ncluding ac:serie$ 6f~' 1 '+'0'"
and. a plarn.tedrdi"'ets(i,om'le 11 s ,
ofJ(ii"'"'j' li'ld .iJ'''1~~:r~~q;€iY'''_:,::<:"l;'_t'
..
,-
3 tr-;:,~t~~.
).~o/
~I{~
~ ;'.:C.r:;:;
c) Energy features such-"so"S'O'l'ar collectorsd'Qrhot=~ ,..
water_'heating, energy efficientfireplaces;'insut~:,ff:::
tion exceeding regulated standards ;.... .
d) Social facilities includinga.chHd..carecenter,.:
recycl ing facilities and an indoor/outdoor-'pool;
e) Site design as shown in the amended application
using a three story straight line configuration
which'will maximize solar utilization;
. -' J)
g)
.
S'tdltwalksalon9 S. Galena Sfrieet;,
'1 S. Galena Si
,7>.',"
Elevators and stairs to serve the three stories from..
the parking garage'; "" . "...' ..,-, ., r 0'''';
h) She and building design to permit unobstructed
movement for wheel chair confined or other handi-
capped persons;
i) The twelve employee units at 925 Durant (part of
this joint application) must be deed restricted
to low income hous i ngand a certifi cate of
occup.ancy issued prior to 'obtaining a C.O. on the
units at 500 S. Galena.
j) All other obligations established in the complete
amended application for 500 S. Galena.
k) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the_plans
shan be submi tted to the Pl ar.mi n9 Offi ce for con-
firmation of their consistency with this amended
GMP application.
fl.
';
~.
f00 o..~rrouaJ tA.
r boo otk-. ere.li M .
I)'tu7I- ?ubm(:..f
W + w/c itBO
"-00-
. ?b+
/.
t ()';f, 1'1 'I,D .,b or'
1_" . '\ "'l{ ,\',,,' ~ ' ,!.
uJe. d-1,1~-kx~'"'\('^ett ~\j()..0L
--,
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~
~
Spencer F. Schiffer
Garfield & Hecht
601 E. Hyman Avenue
Aspen, COlorado 81611
Re: 500 South Galena Project
Dear Spence;
I am writing in answer to your letter of November 25, 1981 regarding the
proposed time table for processing the subdivision application for the
500 South Galena Project. It is most important that fiSC Investments re-
alizes that the time table given in the November 9, 1981 memorandum is a
very tight time schedule. It does not, as referred to in your letter,
indicate the .outside parameters in terms of time necessary for precess-
ing, but rather indicates the. shortest time in which the application can
possibly be Processed. As has been discussed with Hark Danielson, if'
there are any decision delays by the Planning and Zoning Commission or
any delays in the necessary submissions by HBC Investments, the requi red
approvals ~lill nct be .obtained by the February 1,1982 deadline. For
example, the City Council may apply conditions. tc conceptual apprcval at
their. December 14, 1981 meeting; the preliminary plat must still be in the
Planning Office by December 15, 1981, with or without the changes result-
ing frcm the conditions. These changes may very well be necessary in the
preliminary plat apprcval.
Again, the Planning Office has minimized the necessary review time as
much as possible in .order tc provide the utmcst ccoperaticn. The time
table reflects the only pcssible schedule for processing the application
if the necessary approvals are to be .obtained by the February I, 1982 dead-
line. It is now up to IIBC Ilwestrnents to meet the submission deadlines
and .obtain the necessary apprevals.
The February 1, 1982 deadline, as you mentioned in yeur letter, is a dead-
line for submitting plans sufficient to .obtain a building permit. The
bui lding permit does not need tc be .obtained on or before that date.
Let me know if you would still like tc meet tc discuss this issue further.
Si ncere ly,
/~~
A1 ice Davis
Planning Office
cc: Planning Office File
.
":;"',,,"
-
-
'"
~,
i
i ~
I
,
ASPENJTI~LE COMPANY
A TIT~ IN8URAl{CEAGENCY
POST IOFFICE BOX 9590
,
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
(SOSI 925-4444
-
December 2, 1981
To Whom it May Concern:
On October 1, 1981, Aspen Title Company, Ltd., through USLIFE Title Insurance
Company of Dallas issued a Title Commitment to June Allen Moss Cantrup con-
cerning the real property as described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
The commitment under Schedule B, Section 2, Exceptions, Item 11 refers to
utility easements as set forth in a Deed recorded in Book 206 at Page 444 of
the Pitkin County records. By endorsement dated December 1, 1981, said excep-
tion was deleted for the following reasons:
The Deed referred to above is dated April 13. 1964 and was recorded the
same day. The Grantor, Luke W. Anthony, Inc., a Colorado Corporation,
conveyed Parcel B on Exhibit "A" to John Marshall Stirling and Rebecca
Birch Stirling reserving an easement for utilities 10 feet in width along
the entire Easterly 140 feet of Parcel B, the same being a common boundary
with Tipple Woods Subdivision and an easement for underground utilities 20
feet in width running along the Southerly and Southeasterly boundary of said
property from the Southerly and Southeasterly line of the road which will be
platted and constructed along the boundary of said property. Examination of
the plat of Anthony Acres Subdivision recorded in Plat Book 3 at Page 15
shows that Parcel B abuts Lot 16, Block 2 of said subdivision. The Easterly
line of Parcel B under the description of the easement reserved would be
subject to a 10 foot eastment and a 20 foot easement. The Southerly line
of Parcel B is the division line between said parcel and Lot 16 and would
be subject to the 20 foot eastment. The road to be platted, referred to in
the reservation, is now South Galena Street which abuts the property on the
Westerly side. It was probably intended for the 20 foot easement to read
that it would run&ong the Southerly and Southeasterly boundary of said
property.
,
.~
~
The plat of Anthony Acres Subdivision was recorded January 4, 1965, the
dedicator being Luke W. Anthony, Inc. Luke W. Anthony, Inc. has since
conveyed to third parties all of its interests in Anthony Acres Subdivision
and examination of the Pitkin County records shows that said corporation
does not own any property adjacent to said Lot 16 and said Parcel B. We
are informed that no underground utilities were installed in the 10 foot
and 20 foot easements so reserved.
For the foregoing reasons, we and our underwriter have decided to delete
said easements from our Commitment as it would be highly unlikely that
Luke W. Anthony, Inc. would install utilities in property in which it
"llL\o.
has no interest and which in no wa;Vbe of benefit to it.
~
Very truly yours,
ASPEN TITLE COMPANY, LTD.
50 ~ ,Jt'fJ;
Bill E. Tom
Vice President
BET/hgy
Attachment
~
..
u."UFE TITLE INSURANCE Company of Dallas
~
-:c..;-
Endorsement
'-j
Lot 16, Block 2, Anthony Acres
NW 1/4 NW 1/4 18-10-84
Cantrup
Attached 10 and forming a part of
.._<::OHHITNJ::NT __N o.-A~ 1-198
ASPEN TITLE COHPANY, LTD.
Issued by
USliFE TiTLE INSURANCE Company of Dailas
Schedule B~Section 2, Exceptions, is hereby amended by deleting
Item 11.
T~:,., ~~nd()':,ern';ll! ':' Indcje d part 01 !I", PC);"_,, (,r ,~')~r;rr,':'ne"l and IS subject \') ali the terms and provisions
thereof ;)nd (,I :lily PI'O' f,njO~Sljnien!s thc'~":(; c.>;cep' ,0 tne e"len\ expressiy stated ,I neither modifies
"n'l of the terms and ,Hov,s.ons of :he POU~f (jl C:irnrnrtmenl and prior endorsements. it any. nor does it
<.;x:d:d the elfect;'J\~ (idte 01 the POliCY or co''i1':11~ment and ~Xlor endorsements cr increase the face amount
th<:rf::()f
Daled,--.l2.ecember 1, 1981
USLlFE TITLE INSURANCE Company of Oa:Jas
#~d'~
PrlJsidenl & Chief ExeClJli(e Olficer
~~~.
Alle~1 Senior VIce fjresldenl, Secreli!lry ,md Treas...,,"
I~su"'a' <)1 Aspen, Colorado
CI}"nr"'~lgn""f
(
.~
/,
/
/
,.
. '
A"I!J()Ii/,.d (i,'l...,,'." ,J' Age!!1
fv,-"",-1y DALLAS T'TlE AND GUARA."'In COM.PA....-.-
:;:,) /
1:' 'IV'
1"""\
1"""\
GARfIELD &: HECHT
SPENCER F. SCHIFFER
KATHERINE HENDRICKS
(ADMITTED IN MASSACHUSETTS ONLY)
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
VICTORIAN SQUARE BUILDING
601 EAST HYMAN A VENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
November 25, 1981
41981
TELEPHONE
(303) 925-1936
TELECOPIER
(303) 925-3008
CABLE ADDRESS
r"~
RONALD GARFIELD
ANDREW V. HECHT
Ms. Alice Davis
City of Aspen Planning
Department
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: 500 South Galena projeet
.".-. '. ."..~ ~-
Dear Aliee:
I am in receipt of a copy of a memorandum from you dated
November 9, 1981 which sets forth the proposed time table for
the processing of the subdivision exception for the referenced
projeet. We appreeiate your assurances that the Planning Depart-
ment will exercise the greatest possible expedience and the utmost
cooperation in the processing of the applieation. I understand
that the time schedule which you prepared indicates the outside
parameters in terms of time neeessary for processing the applieation,
and that in. all probability it can be done in a mueh shorter time
frame. I would like to meet with you at your convenience to discuss
that further. Regarding the February 1, 1982 deadline, I believe
the requirement is that we submit plans sufficient to obtain.
a building permit rather than actually obtain the building permit
on or before that date.
I am sure you understand the importance of this portion of the
split site project whieh is the eompanion to, and is intended to
subsidize the employee portion of the project. Aeeordingly, I would
appreciate your immediate notification if you foresee any potential
problems whatsoever.
I personally want to thank you for your assurances and am sat-
isfied that our good faith relianee on them is well placed. Similarly
you have our assuranees that we will assist and eooperate in every
possible way to move this through the approval proeess as expeditiously
as possible. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
ec: Hans B. Cantrup
1""'\
--
HBC INVEST;-,ENTS
450 S. Galena
Suite 202
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(-;;~-p,r"lir"""'O":':-'~'",,-- '~';'~'''='
1~~MQ!'I,r't1.,{,.,'t'l._,,'ti~'f 'I-~~
'" ',I .f (. .,,' i~! ._, ! ""',-" ;, r!, ",- ~'. ,.,. "',' ',-", it,., _
1;" "',' ,.""1,, l ",', 1..oJ..... _,., ""-' ..~,.J. "r\~"
': ,m r;r'"'' ".~:--, -".:-~-'.t->~l:~l.i,.(::U l ~ n
~,:::..I" \ij!J. !;$
.....',:'.1 JII' ~ 'illl~
..4 \~)' ' " ~
~,; ~.::, -j ~ "" ~ 1 j' ,
!....;?,f~;i" ,_, . ,. ~ 'iLl!
-;'_*:tiU~~",J 'I~\;-' i'~~"1',--.1"
.;~~ ,~r(i'~0:;~"~f~':~-;!:~'">, .,p.'
l(''''-''."'Yi'''~''O''~
00> ---~1 16 r'~'yUW' +~ ~i
June 24, 1981
:,~:; 'i;
Sunny Vann
Planning Director
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
,..,
i ; ._,', .~-
r ft- \ '\" :'"..'
H.'L",o",,,.I...-'
~L.jL
II
11
RE: 500 South Galena Project
Dear Sunny:
In accordance with our discussion of several weeks ago, this letter and
accompanying information will provide you a summary of our plans for the
project. We would appreciate it if you could review this information and
give us some feedback on our plan so that we may proceed with the
subdivision exception on the project, and commence with construction.
Existing Project Approvals
The project was approved under the 1978 Residential G.M.P. allocation, as
a companion project to the 925 Durant employee housing project. Due to a
variety of delays, neither project has yet commenced into actual construction,
but an extension of time for these (and all other G.M.P.) projects was
allowed under Ordinance #84 of 79.
Although we real ize that the two projects are tied together and that construc-
tion must commence on 925 Durant before we can begin construction on
500 South Galena, we woul d 1 i ke you to focus on the 500 South Galena project
for the time being.
The 500 South Galena project was approved as 16 free market units and one on-site
employee (manager's) unit. The free market units are to be large one-bedroom
units of 1100-1300 square feet per unit.
The architectural design concept in the G.M.P. application had the units
arranged in an L-shaped configuration, as is shown in Exhibit A to this letter.
Sunny Vann
June 24, 1981
Page Two
~
--
Our subsequent studies of the site and the proppsed architecture have led us
to believe that the conceptual plan as set forth in the G.M.P. application
may not be particularly deSirable in today's marketplace, and does not
effectively utilize the site.
We are therefore proposing., to change the plans for the property to a new
confi gurati on, which will ~ave the following effects:
a. One underground parking space for each unit.
b. Large indoor/outdoor pool and common recreation room area.
c. Several elevators; providing for a maximum of six units to be served
by each elevator.
d. Better orientation of the units to permit some passive solar
capability in all ;units, and improving views for a number of the
units. .
Proposed Plan
The proposed configuration of the project is designed in such a way as to permit
an ultimate development of the property into twenty-one (21) free market units.
The additional five units will be applied for at a later date as part of a new
70/30 overlay application, in which Mr. Cantrup will request permission to
construct an additional twelve (12) units of employee housing at 925 Durant,
and add five (5) more units,to the 500 South Galena site via a residential bonus
overlay (RBO) zoning application.
,
However, our current plan a~d request is to proceed with a Subdivision Excep-
tion application on sixteen ,free market units and one employee unit under the
general design submitted as;Exhibit B. All common facilities, the parking
garage, and landscaping could be done in this phase. Then, when and if
Mr. Cantrup later obtains approval for an additional five units on this site,
we would develop those units.
Implications RE: G.M.P. Sco~ing
The following is our evaluation of the proposed modifications to the plans and
how they may have affected scoring under the G.M.P. process for Residential
Development Applications (Se~tion 24-10.4).
(1) Availability of puplic services: No Change
(2) Availability of so~ial facilities and services: No change
(3) Provision for low,'moderate, and middle income housing: No Change
(4) Outstandi ng overa 11 des i gn meri ti ng recogniti on: There was some
confusion as to the initial scoring of projects in the 1978 allocation.
However, for the ptlrposes of discussion, we have tabulated bonus points
awarded under this ,category for each applicant at that time.
Sunny Vann
June 24, 1981
Page Three
""'"'
~
PARK COOPER -
PROJECTS TOP OF GOQDNOUGH 500 s. GALENA*! CENTRAL VAN STREET!
BONUS CATEGORIES MILL !APTS. ULRYCH 925 DURANT WEST HORN ORIGINAL
Public Facilities 2 .8 1.2 .8 2.2 0 .2
Social Facil ities and
Services 1 .2 .8 .6 .8 .2 .4
Housinq 1.2 0 .4 1.0 0 .8 0 !
.
TOTAL BONUS: 4.2 1.0 2.4 2.4 3.0 1.0 .6
Total Overa 11 Points: 49.0 38.2 41.2 42.0 42.8 32.2 24.6
Total Points Without
Bonus: 44.8 37.2 38.8 39.6 39.8 33.0 24.0
Of the projects submitted, T~p of Mill, 500 S. Galena!925 Durant, and Park Central
received development allocations. The question could be raised as to whether the
architectural changes made as part of this revised application, versus that in
the original application, would have resulted in any lesser number of bonus points
given the 500 S. Galena proj~ct in the Public Facilities, Social Facilities and
Services, or Housing section lof the scoring.
However, it should be considered that the minimum points required (without bonus)
for any project to receive an allocation was 39 points. Therefore, the design
consideration (and bonus poirits) relative to this project works neither to the
benefit of scoring of this p~oject vis-a-vis the others, nor to the detriment of
any other project, since no ~roject which received-the required minimum of points
(39, without bonus) was deni~d a development allocation.
Summary
We would appreciate it if youl could review this information at your earliest
convenience, and hopefully we! can discuss it soon.
Our intent is to submit a Subdivision Exception application within the next
two to three weeks.
Sincerely,
~
Samuel K. Downing
SKD:hkm
~
l
1
I
~
..-
",
..-
..-
,,-
;'
./
/
" /
......,
/
/
/
I...
--,
I
I
/
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
L
I
'-----.
~___I
I
,
n
r-'\
~
-
I-
W
W
a:
t-
en
ct
Z
W
..J
ct
~
cti
I _
\\
ORIG'INAL PLANS & EtE,VATIONS
..."'....1',.. ...
Unit Plan
,
500 $. GALENA ST. PROJECT
1_
o '0 20
I
80
~.~t.h
':1.1"
40
I
'6' t. - ~,,"- - 'f' '..v''''''''.'''!'''''' "'~Vt",,'l"'" "\
'\!.f; ..;. "";, '\ ...... f:.' _io.~'_,..."" ~''''Jo. ....;.. -:--. :./.,...... ...t......'.' ~~~.t ~.....-~~.~;.: I"'-~ "~ '..,...
'1"' "",,", . ....-- f . . 1II...... ,. ,- *' r::~,,':: '""'~... ~.r\.,i;,'r ,r" o.
f...'......,.' ... t .. ... '.. '.. -;..'t.~,: ..' ..<.....,...::a' ~.i ,. r -"" '.... ,\_..:. ,-' _tf'_, .... "":... ".f
'~::. '" '. . ".. . .. , , '" '. , "
~'-.....~
0,""
...."
~ '
~
~~
~........//
,:-...,
"
"
-.....
........
.I
--..............
...........
/
"~
....
. .
:.
. .~.
...., ~I.~. ,...
:::::-
~o
.........
r
>
I
1'"
lIhl' ....l.WO..
ARCHITECTURAL
".
~.---,
. .. 1'0
,
..
"
,: ~' '.. \:'-'..;~:.~~r.jl~~" .. {-e~ -~";~~~..t.~~ ", ~ ....".. ~~:1 . .;.~:;'(';;j.:r..t~~;~';;<.tJr.~~~?k~~i
,"- I .. . ,,-,"'oJ: .mea',.... a. ............,..~..: ~'~ cpPLAM)'~,VJIW..To ~ ~-.:"'~- ....;!::.....
r'~ .~ ..", ,. "':''''~''~ .1'......, .. ..",.."..~~t'.""~...t... ..' ~.f .. *' i." .,;.~..,..-:'<t;::..~.~., ~~. ,~~
. . ',.r 't' ..~"" ('o-;-- ...... ..~~ ~'l"r.. ,,",w' ,,' '.A~. ......~..c.. .." ..,,~. ';'..,~
.'" .:~ "-: ...::..' ;>~:..~-;1; ."...,...0(: ~.!:~ .0.. . ..:~. 1'i)!- :.~ 'l"t.ill[t.i. .t;,,\ ~.,~
~.; ..:":1..~.J..~:':..".''' ,..:Jl. ~~...t,......~.}' _ '1\":1. .?j" "C".~' .....f."~\"Si., . ",~~;O1l!"~
.;...."i4..,',."'..~',.,'_''"''_..->".~...__..._.,
~
1""\
.'
:
.r .
;~::.:. -:--
+--
~
~
","o[]
rn
....:.-
I! c;j;~.~
' I ' i' ,
Typical Unit Plan
500 S. GALENA
Size 1000 - 1200 s. f.
Sale Market Price
@
.-+~-
.~
,
o
~)
F
j"'" --
024
8
I
18
.
--
.
i
!
.
.
;
,.
.
>
.
.
>
r:
.'
!I
(I:
II"
"
.
.
~
.~.
,r'i
.'
'! :
.'
'~ 'f-
,-'_=- t --
~,-~>~!~_/:;-- .
~
",-.- ,
----...... --
:':.' d__~_
-"- ....
- ~--
., ,-Tr
:i
~
~
\
"
- .----',
.
, ~_::
>
~
.
~
.
__':"0.
._ -;Ill
-~-_<.
.-
. .
>
-~
.
,
~
>
~--
.
.
.
~-:..
.
.
.
8'-.=_~~-- :(5
z
:;
"
- -~:;;&
,~
. '.
-
.
'.
!
i
~
'I
qONCEPT~t~~~PlANS AND_J
[J'II' !~i I
- I I ~ :ri
I"
. ,
. -
i SOO 50UTH GAUNA.
-".---
~
,
--:j
.,
.,
10
"'Q..JI
/
./
/
~
/.
.1'
I
I
A
/,
/'~8 //
t/. hv'---, ; .
/! ;i. ...
, ,
. i '
r-"
"
, ,
@
o
! '
1"""'\
--,... '; "."r'
':;:.
'.,
i
i
~~7
.,-~,
:,
~
,
~
-f.'
:,._-~
.-~.~~;~. (,
L. '~:'
. ......
f. l
6 ,
@ .
i- f)
0
c:
~ ~
or
.
" ~
,.
r l
m ,
Z
~
I ~
~
,.
m
m
~
,
r:l.'1ImII[)
Ub
!;p ~
. -
: z ~
:. -n
t: ,r
500 SOUTH C ALE N A
_",C'.C<."'_
o
I
/
-:-----
I I
I
d--
III
11
:1
,
~"
i
,I
IL-
r-
Ii
Ii
il
If--
I~--
,I
Ii
I
I,
II
,I
!I
I,
Ii
II
I~---
1,-
"
II
Ii
Ii
"= 11
II
II
il
II
~::: -
on
duilllliw
~
~ ~ ~ I
- s: (jl
.. !'; 'i
t2
500 :50UTH CALENA
...-. ~oo
D
~
~
~.'
.,
,
.
"
..\":."
~'~'~~.':"~.'G~~._~~. '. ~.'.
.,..;...~..:.::.;.1""';;l:':,_...~~::.:-~ ,........ .i.......;;
~"~~;,~..,~ :.~:,::i:~:iL~~~~;,~.....~
,'!'.
.,-...::;..".;,..........
...
..
~ .'. ....,.~
....-~-_.
.....z;....:..:.. "_"
-.._.-.~ ,., - ,- ',.' ._.:.~.:~.<~...;;;.:_..:~..:...;-=-.: "'.~:.,
~~:'."" ""j:~::':~~_ Il<.'.: -::-~'.::~.;.
h ,-':.''1' . ...~~'~<;"~:_~..
, ~,,:~
..----.....:.,
'.".
:.~..;';;S-_::.,...
.,.........,.'.......~
~:.......
:;-=::+-"!!:z:-:;~~:~,'!i;:-;..., :-:-;_' "I.:"~. '~:.;o;.;::~;..
":';.:::-=..-. ."-- - - '..:;::-..:.:_'::s:.'.~: ,.,,",," ... -:. .~_ ..~_,:... .' '.._.... '.:...._...::--~=-=-:"~_
___..,~;_ . ~__ . ....:.:.' ~,--.!!:',~-'- h.~=.''1Oi' '~~-:--'~.%-.
...-.......-.-...~.~_Ic..r_ _._..--..0. ._...-..._____~.~.-........~ _~
'-.-. ..;:;;:...-=.:..~..,.._=_~_...~, '_';.,___":=~.;~"..... 4-.~ -.
-"""'::c _.-:"=:":":.'--.._. ~',,"'t-....:o.;...~_....:.;.. _~';.'=":'~_'-':'~ _...:.=:..:.;.:_..~:-__..
.,.
..;;;-:::.~....:-.. .-.:::-:-~_..,.,.""...j."'_.."'....,'-.,.;;,..
. ",_,,,''''-=-=':~-;''...,e.___''''''~''''''''''''''''''''''~_'_'_ .~....,~
"""'.
,.....~.<-..;: ,~
w_ ~""_.'.-=--".:"~"'-'~"""'.'.'''''''''''''',",",.-.::.';..~:,.";..:....~~~::
.._--"" _.............,..,_..."-~'-._-:::_...... ~._-.,.
_.---
". '. .--.~. .. ". .
:':-:-:-.:~~..~'~.:::,i:::.:.:_;-::.
. . -',' -,-. - - .
~ ------..---.-....- -_..
:.=-':'~':...'
--::':":~:~~~-;-:~':,::,>=..::.r::-~=~;i~.,;:...;7..~~..,_::-":':" .:~~~:~~.o;~'~""''''~~'_'
._-~;;:~:-:-~~_,..::.:iO~:---,:,':" ._-':=-....;:.-.':;.' . .... ,", _' ._,_
~~':::::'_.:' ,. ':"~:'~~:~~...:.:~"'.:~::';.'7~.~~,~' .:~~~:....:';. -::'~;';'~~~:'_ -:'..
-. .,.,...,.,...,"""'"'""'"....>--.....__.._,...:...._"._~...-..--
.~~ .:::;.::~~~..:-~;: :.~:.: :f~,.->!.
...~~.... ..,.......,
.......~.,...,..-""._'---, -.."::-= -
"
i
I
I
I
ti.,
l,"
. i~ i i
.<
'>'
"
....~'.;.-':"--.
.'
Ii
;1
Ii
,/
II
j.
.
"
/
,
I..huY\.1.. - &~nce.
~.
:..... I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
.', ."" :-.
roo Leaves
'Oh" e.',"'OeClCf1.'.'..'1.,Co.
" l__.
[':j>~ -.
square footaye of the employee hous ing pro)e<.: ts as the
bas-is..ofa speical review~ to increase the FAR for the
. .-..~--commereial site.to.the maxcimum comme'rcciaclc'c'sqllca.re.cfQotagec'
C"' -"cc'"C;"c.c",~""-,'''''",,allowa:b1e by.. t.hecocle.irFit:ha.tc.'zone 'di&.t-r~.c~...di'c' ,':r'..J.""''''~'''2Gcne
~
.j
!
.Section 2
...".",
""",;c::::.r;. ..., "---'l'lfft~ction- 24 -lL7 (:b~of'cthe~cMonic ipal.J:ode :..:of ~e::j:::i~1"...M!).f;:l,;::.i',
-....,:~ .. ASpen."'eil'C'k't'Ied,.."itese inded '.~nd Elfpi:'r'J!!del'e f'mits :~;;:b.e')and..the::~s~c _::t'5:,,~:.,;b
.h.e.reby repealied.. and ree naeted asfo1:1.lllW.s: ,"" (; 0.. "''' ,we ,."'" Q",":..w.;.~,""""",,: i.
""'.". ,.,....~" . ~_., ...~ '~fc,,:c'*1I:tr.:.":-SI'i'<:5Uld ':an-;apPJ:-.i.can:~p.revi'&l:.1sd:ydawa'rd.ed 'a _ d:eve:lo.pm~'iV c,,,,,,, 2".
lil'.I,"''',~i~Z''.;,~_ : u.a.l>w.obc,en tdecviate. .f rOm a~".J.eS's.elllliad: ",.element.r.oeJi J!.l1:i;.1it ~4itl:l:).'1:)::t:
p-ropGsal, or iai:l. to ..s:a.tisfy any material condit'ion:
ilUposed on the allotm.ent .rece.ived; -or fail to eomp:lY'~'-'c;'~~
"wi ththedevelopment."sUhedli1:es ubmitted- with' his' :appoki",.:., ':::.'
._"e. _,. ;;.,c,c:a:t;.ion,.. the pl'anning''Of'f:ic-et.-shall ,.notJf,y,. ; ,the" pJ.,a~g<;i;."0..-:
ahd . zoningcomlll'issi.on;,,,,.whiehmay ,'after hear'ing ".a,cecol1l'-'O".
mendto,eitj' cOUncl"Ji.';'that'all or any part. of the allot-
ment be rescinded. . ..The cJ::iteria for determinatiol1_o.f"s ,.-0
wheIian<l:pplicationhas -devi'ated subs tantiai.1Y--.from.th'e"....
"'- .. ..---o-rigmal GM.P,.pro,posalshall.;include.the,~foll,o.wil1g.:~_ ._.~__.,.
;\41i;)~,e iit
.
..; Any change whieh would potentially alter .the poi:!1ts.....
originally awarded during .the GMP scoring;
'f<;:::::lpjl~ ",n:i:J. '~ti1!itl;ychange:;c 1fir,(l)m..ti:lce~a,p'P.l5'c)'l:tl~<l a'ire hii::~e:c:tn1ll.'et:.!e:1a:d<,-!s;:i~~(t r:iillr(:~
. design of the project;
'l':.';;lS :l.'Z,f..'Jmon iCVD("'Qi;.c'~irlI~;r,ol) ':Ariy? -chang e;::i.il'l' t!:le .nUlllb>'E!iIf, l';s,t zer, and ":type 'dJI! empli-e\?l$l.~5 icZ:e:
units; and
Any -mod if ication to the type and. ,level of physieaL .r.. ;..
serviees and facilities o~. the project. .,__ '.
Should a change in an approved applieation falL within
any of these eriteria ,. the planning and zoning commis.:-.
sion shall hold a public hearing to determine the appro-
priateness of the amendment to the original plan. The
planning and zoning commission shall reseore the oriyi-
nal application in order to determine whether,
the applicant would no 10nSer meet 'the minimum thresh-
. trolc:i he must achieve in eactl"eategory' or for all cat-e-
gories to receive an allocation; pr
the appl icant' s posi.tionrelativec.tothe-othec.apgJ..:L",_
cant's durin;! thecompetitionwoul<:h'h<t~~,ged. ..
Should e.ither of the above two conditions be met,---t.tre.',-
e.f~!.t,llJ:er.':J2. . 'J.;; .-..... i."'60h1iIl;;~?:.ion shall make a lrecQl,lIifendation totl1e'c:<.:i tl1t"",~J;l~~ciiH
;;,1..:t;;J:;':... ;c....___:...._.. -.....dif-=as to whether the aPPlicant's alloc.ation..shO.u?d~~.['E:
Cl<'..,......!",-e--, r:. ". ,. ,..,.,...< ,W',~., ... ;--"f'es din-d ed.' "8houi'd 'th e"-abov'e'.,'condit iOnS '~no"tbe.; m.~\Kth:e;m'-' . ;
.: :~.',':~~^:;:,:;'" r.. : ".- "',,:. "', ~comild5'$'ion sha'li make' a. 'r ecolll!llend at ion j;p .the:: c.i t<Y.::;~.\:l.n:_,,(. c
.'. C-',., '''''''''''''''''i-'" '''''''''>c,LL"asto ..the ...app.r,o):l-r..ia,t-l;:lleS; s cLOf.,_ ,the. ..amend.m.Ei!-p:t:s, ..tQ~.t.Qi=;"';,..",.....
"..",,, ''''~ >cori'!filnall 'p:rolilos ai,., and. an,y~\fl,hll"t.her .C(i)I'.d.i:t.ions.,.,...o:f;'f;iil;.pp:J;:Q,\!~l;.;,: "
- -- . .whtc:hthe . appl ic_an-t; sha 1.L~,lue.e..t,,*.,- ~i.".;'----~~_.~, ,.,--,..--...:.~~..;..,.,2:....,;<_:.~::_~
(..
7'
../
Xiern 2. - -I ~ ~hee.i5
~
1978 GROWTUM^N^GE~1[;r.1T RESIDENTIAL
TALL Y Sl:EETS
Project Name: Top of Mill (26 units)
;..
-
Planning P & Z Counci 1
. Office .
Public Facilities -
- -- -,3--i(;-E
1. Water Service " '-fi~}{:+~; 3 :
2. Sewer Service 1 1.2
L Storm Drat nage - 3 - 3
4. Fire Protecti on 1 2
5. Parking Design S 3
6. Roads 3 3
7. Energy 3 3
.
BONU S . 2
Socia 1 Facil ities and Services le~- f
1- Public
TransDortati on 2 . 1.6
2. Police Protection . 1 1.4
3. Chi 1 dcare .
2 Z
Facil ities .
4. Bicvc1e Paths 1 . ~" . 1
-
5. RecYcling Facilities 1 - 1.6
6. Handicapped Design 1 1.6
Features '. .
7. Commerci a 1 Support 1 1.2
Proximity
. BONU S 1
Housing
.
1. Middle 0 0 .
2. Moderate 4 4
3. Low 12 12
BONUS 1.2
.
TOTAL POINTS IV! THOUT BONUS 42 44.8 44.8 - sa
TOTAL POINTS WITH BONUS .
42 49.0
j'--.-"-----"
B.
C.
me
.
"
~
,-,
1978 GROWTH HflNAGEMENT RESIDENTiAL
TAl.lY SIIEETS
;"
Project Name: Park Central West (10 units).
Planning P & Z Counc il
. Office
Public Facilities .~. " .
'"
1.' Water Service ",.,,3 r'\f';-~; 3 <..:. ..' .',
" ,-\ --
2. SeWer Serv ice 3 3
-
3.- Stonn Drainaae - 3 3
4. Fire Protection 3 3
. .-,.-.- ---
5. Parkina Desian ~ . 2.8 .
.,6.,. Roads . 3 2.8
7. Eneray 3 2.8 .
BONUS 2.2
---
Social Facilities and Services 'i_l ,::,~ . " '-- '.'1'-;-(::'., I
1- Public
Transnortation 2 . 1.8
2. Police Protecti on 1 1.2
--'-
3. Chi 1dcare 1 0.8
Facilities .
4,. Bicvcle Pa.ths . 1 . 1.0
Recyclin; --
5. Facil ities 0 1.4 ,
6. . Handi capped Design 1 2.0
Features . r
. .
7. Commercial s.upport -
2 2.0
Proxirni tv
BONUS 0.8
Housing
1. Middle 0 0
2. Moderate 0 0
3. low 6 9
BONUS 0
TOTAL POINTS WITHOUT BONUS 35 39.6 39.8
. 35
TOTAL POINTS WITH BONUS 42.6
-----~~-
.A.
r-'--~
---.-,.-
.
B.
j...--------
',~
c.
~ B-:=--
.~.
,-,.
-1<:'
~.
1978 GROWTH MANAGEMENT RESIDENTIAL
TALLY SHEETS
.
~roject Name: 500 S. Ga1ena/925 Durant (29 units)
.
A.
Planning P & Z Council
. Office
Public Facilities - -
--
1- Water Service . .; .~;';;;;; -:-c..'(~ '2.., :..t:',~~ LR ..
2. Sewer Service 1 '. 1 11
.~ .,
3. Storm Drainaqe . 3 ? R "l n
5. Fire Protecti on 2 2.2
-- ... .
5. Parkinq Desion 2 2.4
. ,
6. Roads 3 2.8
..._, . ._".." . .- .. ..." .
7. Enerov 3 2.8 3.0
BONUS 0.8
Social Facil Hies and Seltvices ,
, , ~ t~ 'S: ; j :~,!.
1- Public
TransD.ortation 1 1
2. Police Protecti on 1 1.2
. .- .-
3. Chil dcare 1 1.4 2.0
Facilities .
4. Bicvcle Paths 1 1.4
5. Rec~cl ioq Facil ities 1 1.6 2.0 ,-t
6. :iandi capped Design 1 .. 1.8 2.0
Features . I
7. Commercial Support 1 1.4
Proximity
BONUS 0.6
Housing
1. Mii:ldle 0 0 .
2. Moderate . 0 0
3. Low 12 12
BONUS 1
TOTAL POINTS WITHOUT BONUS 35 38.0 39.6
TOTAL POINTS WITH BONUS 35 40.4
I ..
C.
.
. ..
. .
..
-:
; . 'J
~
,-,.
1978 GROWTH MAN/lGEMENT RESIDENTIAL
TALL Y SIIEETS
Project Name: U1rych (6 studios)
A.
,
. Planning P & Z Counci 1
Office .
Public Facilities C-1P'; . ,
L~later Service ,. ., .' "- :3 ....--,.--. 3.0 - i
2. Sewer Servi ce - 1 --;.., ~~ 1.0 2.0 .'
. 3 --
3. -, Stonn Drainage --- 2.8 3.0
-.--'-
4. Fire Protection . 3 ~'- ~, .' 3.0
..
5. Parkina Desion - C ~..~. 2.2
..--
6. Roads L.....".. ).' !,,'^'-!-~"-"!^, 3 2.8 .3.0..> ,
.
7. Energy 3 3.0
... "-
BONUS 1.2
..
Social Facil ities and Services' .. .' tL;;s I
" ,- '.:
.. - , ,i.
l. Public .
Transoortation 2 1.8
2. Police Protection 1 ,- . 1.6
..---
3. Childcare 1 1.0
Facil iti es
- :
4. Bicycle Paths . - 1 31>":; 1.0 . "i
5. Recvclina facilities 1 . 1.2
-
6. Handicapped Des i gn 1 ,::,.., .'. 0.8 1.0 i
Features ,
,
7. Commerci a 1 Support 1 1.6 2.0
Proximity
BONUS 0.8
Housing
1. Middle 0 0
10 10 -
2. Moderate
3. Low 0 . 0
BONUS 0.4
.
TOTAL POINTS WITHOUT BONUS 36 36.8 38.8
TOTAL POINTS WITH BONUS 36 39.2
0,;
-
----'"
B.
,'.\
C.
.
1.', ~
-
,
~.
r-,
.. d... ..,.... ".""""::'.:'
':.,'.:,'.,....... " .,'....-,',....'.....
1978 GROWTII MANAGEMENT RESIDENTIAL
TALLY SIIEETS
Proj~ct Name: Goodnough (9,units)
A.
Planning P & Z Council '-
. Office
Publ1c Facilit,ie~ (Not Available): - ',;.: ,-c'
-.-
J. : Water Servi ce ,i -:3... 'W ,~! :'.'~~ r -."';lC. .~ 1.8 ,i.i"-- "r,
2. , Sewer Serv i ce - 1.6
c... .. ~ '" ..--,- ''';', -, . '~."'.
3. Storm D . . ':- ., 3.0
ralnage .._,--~.-
4. Fire Protection ,"" 2.6
-
5. Parking Design -- . - 2.4
6. Roads - 2.2 2.5
7, . Energv' 2._0 2.5
BONUS . 0.8
--"..-
Social FaciliUes and Services ',;;;::":10 I j:'d:.: i ;.,tii;:~ -
....,'..... .'',c,', ) .... ~.'"
1- Public
Transportat i on 2.0
'-"--"-~
2. Pol ice Protection " 1.0
. ;
3. Childcare 1.0
Facilities
,
4. Bicycle Paths .' 'A'''.'' 1.2 1.6
,--'1:.-
; , . 1.6 2.0 1
5. Recycling Facilities -'--"
6. . Handi capped Design ! 1.0
(." .. ~ .... .. r' i
Features . i
,.
7. Commerci a 1 Support 1.1'1 2.0
Proximity
BONU S 0:2
----..~..
Housing
1. Middle 0
2. Moderate . 10
'.---.-
3. Low 0
".-.'--
BONUS 0
TOTAL POINTS \1 ITHOUT BONUS 35..4 37.2
.~-.
TOTAL POINTS WITH BONUS 36.2
_.,~-
::.., ","
.
B.
l. ~ J
c.
;
~
'.
,-..
1978 GROWTlI MiINAGEMENT RESIDENTIAL
TALL Y SHEETS
Project Name:
Van Horn (12 units)
A. Pub1 ic Facilities
-,-,." "
-1~~
2.
3.
" .-----.-4_.
5.
~ ~ ~ 6.1
7.
W.aterServi ce ..
Sewer Servj ce
Storm Drainage
Fire Protection-
Parking Design
Roads
Enerav
BONUS ..
I
B. Social Facilities and Services
1. Public
Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Childcare
Facilities
, / 4) Bicvcle Paths '; ~---
5. RecyclinQ Facilities..
6.' Handicapped Design
Features
7. Commercial Support
Proximity
BONUS
C. Housing
1. Mii:ldle
2. Moderate
3. Low
BONUS
TOTAL POINTS WITHOUT BONUS
TOTAL POINTS WITH BONUS
Planning
Office
i _ ._
,
'::. ..1
1
1
"
" >~r;;' ~ .
",'1"'_:"
. ,
'.;:.. 1 "t '"
2
>_... 1
2
.., ~ ~.
.. .
o
1 -" .. . '"
;!
1
.,;.. .0.
o
Pari"
"
~'.
-1 :":'ped Le';; ~
1
o
o
12
25
25
)
,
, ,-
..
,
i
P & Z Council j
2.4
1.4
1.6
1.6'
2.2
1.4 .
1.8
0.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
1.2 "
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.2
o
o
12
o
31.2
32.3
. .
-". -'
3eO, ,.
2.0
2.0
..
---------
.. ._.u.___,_
.,
: !
.. - ..
'. ,
._., i !
'- ,
--,"
1.0
,2,,0; . '-. j
1.0
1.0
33
~.'
,-"
. " ..
1978 GROWTH MANAGEMENT Rl:.SIDENHAL
TALL Y Sf/EfTS
Project Name:
Cooper and Oriqina1 (7 units))
,
""'-'-~_..~_._---
. Planning I. P& Z COtlnci 1 .. .
Offi. ce
A. Public ,Facilities -~-- I
. " , :le" .. ,
. .
.. 1. Water Serv ice , , , 'l'--<oc,,'~ 1.4 .,..,_.,- . , , .
--_.~-_.-
__e' 2, ,,-Sewer Service 1.2 2.0.. , .
"'- ,-..... ~",,-,.' 'l~'v ~ ~~:' .. , '~ ._~t ---' . ,
,--,-'--"--
Storm Drainaoe . 2.2
3. 2 .. . ..
H
~---,~ '.__"u_
4. Fire Protection .. .1. '..~::~ :., 1.0 . ""
~---, "._~. -'-'-"'-'-~' ' . --,-
5. Parkino Desion . '" J ..p....". 2.8
._-_....,._._.~.._.,.- -". .. .. .-
~ 6. Roads . t)".,; ii.,~,[FJS. 2 2.4 L'iL'_o'.J:-t.. ; -,'-<.
,..,....--...-'.-..- ..... --
7. E!1ergy 3 2.8' 3.0
.__n .. -."".---
~ BONUS 1 .0
.' .
,
B. Social Facilities and ServiceSi: ~,} .fTIties nd Se ':" ,. ]/.: ; ;'~";cJ ..' "' .,.0'\
.~ !"
..
J. Public
TransDortati on 2 1 .8 .'
. .
2. Police Protection .' .: 1 .. ',' . . " 1.0
..
: --".-..-.,----
3. Chi1dcare 1
Facil ities 0.8
".... ~..'-'-"- .. . .
... 4. Bicvcle Paths .. } ; J ' '~" r.-, ' 1.2 [ ':.1.
v ",_, ;" '.Iv".l
5. Recvc1ino Facilities 0 1 .0 ,.
..-- ,
, 6. Handicapped Design .. " ~',,-: ;': 1 ;~) u~:::~ ;~rl 1 ~. : )1;
c I Features .. : 1.2 l.
7. Commercial Support 1 1.8 2.0
Proximitv
BONUS .. . 2.0 /
.
C. Housing
1- Middle 0 10 -2.0
.-..- "-.....---
2. Moderate 0 0 .
3. Low 0 . 0
BONUS 0 .
TOTAL POINTS WITHOUT BONUS 20 24.6 24.0 - , .,
TOTAL POINTS WITH BONUS 25.2 .
2
.
~
r...
.rtefv\ 5 - pI- Z. rui nL.t1~j
.1""'\
/'"
,- .~.
i
!
,
t-
..'. ,....""..."."" RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 .~~.""=, I
~:::O::::;~: ~9 ;::::;;:::O:n:,::n:n:e~i'L~.ti.:'::h n::~'::~;~~~!
f!~!;"i.~,:g:~t;f,~:'-QW:~11;-11:ht.tl~"s::~~, 90~~]:9' i I ..~h~ll)bcrl>:,;.,_1>ler;:b9r~,Jlf<:~~m~. we r eEh ic"."""y_~ ;.
~~lh n~(" .~Qlm.:,$9AA.l)Il'~,1J~ri'{f~J!5<fRJt~~ar i:\1:;t'?L .Y!e It()n,~ilU~fgg:Jt;''l,P()B~4-8, I:pre i'JBi!.. 3.11ti:'t z. i'Ei
o,~an 'i~J.s.cl;~~,-,,~))f@.gil:n:jW.~:\1,:V'{c;~ .~J,Lj;i:\!1E7,{~:l:t\1;F!,l).'Jl'J,~h".J9-al'l'S tzu1'!;0r,jL ap4 4A:Ei"f' ." "it
:; '.~~~ l:>.:o~,:.,t;heh"p}-anni~g . Qff1k.e,'i,l~f;~x: tf,~~()rrl~Y:':'Do;r<?:t:hl;~[~~%r]j~,~'IiOm..J.blne's;-w..t"&;,;;.;;,jC
tne Bng1.'neerJ:ng 'Of f 1ce;J~m l'1arka.luna-s of the 'Wa te, J::':._PE\J29r:t;:ln~ t,. .._" .. .
',_ .... " ,"' . J:... ..,"" _..,:.;,.,..;",.:1; __.~.. F.'~. \__,. ',o"~
This. is it public hearii1g for developers to makepr@.se~tFb'" .'.
.-A "'~..-': ",;j::j,<;ms,onthei;rapPlications in aecordance,~ith the Gro\~th--'
. c.: i-ianaiienleht Plin' as ,. adopted~. in ::Qr.Q.i,~am;:E;~. '1;; ,co~<J,~J:Z.. ;.A'h,e.~""" '"
Planning Office has given the:j.rr-ecomrrt!Zndati<:;)i.i$;::$QiseorEis~~""
,,~~~~'::i3.;;iict;j.Ei;.,.c~~~ :t:ec;~iy;~g,p)l:7- \=~~h. aglUi~,~HS~AlJfLt!:l~ ~',.~!~!:nf~~~jrR~, ;=:~'-
. Zonutg CommJ.SS10n' tnTT 'sco"r'e'e'ach appI1cat:rcon".e\;>m.p::;!:';!ie',:;",.,':.,,":,.c,'C,
", and -average the seores and det:err:ti,ne, which applica tions .~':. "," ,
,_,___, . ,.meet; the requirer,lents and quotas 'of the ordinance. TEe:'" _ =
i{~1f~i;(i,',-4~~,;~;::;:;.~:.::.' ~;6:>r~~!=.:o(pusirieSS'1iJ.l b~aS;h6rt Rx:ese.nt.at:j.on by Bin',:':, "
,,~...,.~'" ;KimB;"ead'r' ,:"ppJ,=icaT;l't. wiP4~B~,;~iY;~Pl;f~B~i5i}BHft~s'"t2is.t~~&~~50.',.'
en and elar~fy the1r appl~ca,t1on, a _..4::> r.unpteCtJ:nnernBrea,K'j'
and the final seoring session. '. :.
This proj eet is located on Hopkins Street..,~_.?:'her.e ~re six,
sfudio units proposed. He felt his small projeet is berits'
_~.." "c"" 1?enCtliz~dfor its location and size. .' Beeauseof the
,'" eits tiIi.g:road's; it wouidbe-' ir.:pos.s:j.Al~,. foJ;' ;..hir:;, t.P HEov,i,~o
a bike path.- The Planning Offiee reeor.unendation'gave'1'i':i.r.:
'., gn!;l."o).lt;.,o,f' two possible. points for.commercial support, yet
it,is located tt-10 blocks fromCity~larJ~et and the dOJif.IiEo~ll;i.;, ,
--''....' - a,re~.. He cannot provide undergrq~nq 'R~5~ip,g""iel)~1~;)r~fR,:,=~
fac111 ties, recyeling and handicappedfaeilitJ::es \~:i'tJi.;th1S .
small a projeet.
..:;'., '~~
t~,h ~;'f-;;c, <
Andre Ulrych .
..".......~ '''1'''' "'.....
'. ; ,-; '~.", .' ~ : ' 'r
Kane, said they were eonsided,ng.nine applications under ..
two seetions of the Growtf-;Ua-nag.eljLgiit':gla,n','l'h~r,-e aIi~;..'.> or
provisions in the ordinanee for '54 residential uri i t.s"-anO:"'~'~'~""
.- ." 3,oV lodg~llg 1..1nitS\1ith certai!1exempt~o!1sfor e,mployee
~r "'k-&g~,ging.', . The; f~~a,l Cte~er:nf!1a.~{~n "~lilr- r'7sui ~."".~~.' a. r~~9pi;;
.. - hon- from P [, 3 t~"i:.he': Cl:ey:'GO:':In<:'[++"Otl,,~hJfp,rtfi&ne~lfll?s;;:~., ri<.d.l
There are 7 res1denhal app11eat10ns for a .totat of :7~ ;..'
"'''(.l:,~~t.i>" K~ne~~]~~dthattheybe presentedln,i'j-lp}la,betical
. ,~'. G-i;.Q"-e" J:-'; Be',snov7ed,'olT. am~r?;~a,:9.n,' a"'f'-;gl.:b.C ,at:. tf'l'.n.'.....,1j,l.O. f; '.~1:ii'2;.......n.. '^',;;
. .. . ,. ., ....l.; .' .'~' "-J..rl..~.:td'-'".,",._ G...... .:..I.. ,.,'~c..;""...".....;c:,,,.....~..
The"sevenapp11cat10ns .1n order.o oresentatJ::on are':""-'
Andre ulryeh, Cooper and Origin~l, 500' S:Galena-andr '-"c'.
925 Durant, Goodnough, Park Centra,l "Test, Top of ~1ill,
and.Van Horn. Kalle asked that the):' speak directly and
precisely toward the eriteria in the ordinance as the '"
Board members have had a~mple tim~ to ~eview the applica~,
tiorts, There are two applicationsfc;: lodging units
\>lhieh are in order: Aspen Inn and the Hountain Chalet:
Kane. submitted for the record one.. file ..for..eacb. .applicant
with the original applieation, the Planning Office reeom:':
mendations, referral ageneies' c02~ents, and relevant
memos. If the applieant has appeals, they are to be made
to the City Council.
"
'1
i
i
,
.-','" .
:'t;I:;;';>c,;;;,::~~L, ,1ffhl:'iisked"if'tilfycH Ps'}en~~fqye~s,W:Qu.+~ be.. using ~.hesl:, 1.1A;it;;:.,,,,
~;~i:~~\~c '.~:5~;i;2'" ",?,~';;:~{:~f1i,~i:Yf?}'li{$..;id" ttl~~.~tJ;;et\~8N.t~:,g~Y\~;,f,f.t1S~:.s';:0-i:R&7' wBt:~,&~B.~9~:,~~'
,:l;.'..f~.'.-',,-";: ~" ..-K.:}+'.\"',h!r'.\'&i'i.,'~f,:,fl.f ~~q, th'7~.'l:ne..Pta,n!1:r~<;f,r.lC?-';.H,?,tl. " ~y,9f:e't~~s\,HJ:RE~~S,-e8t~"';'~'I; .'..
" .'. '" ", ", . '. ''''. ';"pGJ:nt'fo-r' handrCapl'€;U', faC::f\~~ 't."e'~"... '. 't:l~l.,".; ?-Rq ;r.J,~s 'f,:t:.,q.!"'<l-!'1.iAl'ie1. '.'
., ", ..... ... ' 1-,..' ....T. ...__... .~.",~...O__",",._"_""~..,..,_.t_.,.._..~.",,,,.__.,.,..~,,,-_,,,\,,.,~,,"_..r_,,",.....,..
. app11ea.t~on. '.." " ,"..' ". .,H.
tHt~-t-,;0",W-,.<"'t"~>;;,q,,,,,,,, ". ....,.,.. .'. ......... ..,.,.. , ...... .' .',"
ir.-,:,..:.,.~~p~~n;~~,f-?~.f1.J!....I!J,~;~,?~,g..~,.: .... ,;r~~l<:P1sQ.~...y:e., ..'.,t.'t!;~:'J?f.l~".~n...,ta t"f..~.,9. ,Th~,..il.,...n..9' ~!;ke.j1:;-...,:.th.,. ~~..",~..tl."~f. ~.' t5...<. '."
:;~.\,; u", ..., 'i' ';' '5c:or~'for water"beraJ::s7c .D.eGal.l~~;U:+1:j.l;1oug\1,>J1't5~~6ttn~~:";,.EIi~"B
"...' " tll!~'WaterDepartment. sa1d ther~ w.<;lS ia problc~~,l,tiGO\l'IQ.J)9-c",
rQsolveJ. 'l.'his niso' applies to LhlleJs.bi~ei'systeci, :'1';J~c:'::;:
. '....., -.'. ~ .....( . ... ..~'"..' _.' ., " ~u. ......, '"
str>rm ,!t';:ti.nagc \'lil.l. be~ clry'\>!p:).)"",,,,., ',;U'l "~..'.:(.'1.)
'.
^
,-,
~
. . - , ,~ .
""..,,,,.~.-::-:.:::.,'..,,,.....~'.~;;';' ......". ;;." ~,;"""._,..,-"~~~ "-,""",,,,.,..,-, -,
,. .' ' '''''''C~ ,,' 'Ie'...... ~1l'(L. .
,,,,',,=,,,,,,p,,c ..,..""......J:,..""........ ..,.
. . l\~me,n.J:.l.[W~!~D.(L.~9l}tl Zoning,..:;; .
.. .Harcn'I4,'-.197~'l~
- ' .' .. -" ",," "'." ,.",' ~.".::=.
,.c....."": ,.",. 'c''''''',' "'They r'e'ceived tW'o"out of'a"possib:LcvthreGmpoi:nts f@'r"no..'<.4:;;;
'~"C ., but. noted that the traffie onCoopeJ;'!,is eity,;Marke""",')etc~'c)p
traffic, not that generated from this project as they have
prov.ided more. than adequate off-street parking. He ques-
tioned their seorc on police protection beeause of their-'
;J~(}""l\c~Oi!;];; <j''''''~b''..<'iR1i,ty,tot'he, police., -stlClt;iolJiJ....nd td,oltlntOwn LG,J;stl',t,!jl't,;QH
eomplcte 1 ightingsurreuftding,. the,:bui lding., . ,acccssability
,rromthe alley and streets,ctc. Hcquestionodth9,nec4,..
'.~", - .~._-';~::-fck c.hild.care facili ti.cs ''''LHc;n(;llj.<astiQue(L:t!J.c;i,:c~scQ.r(;;,.Q~,;,;;;;;
';:;':on~r;,.o.'@.t!.",l:):f"two; po i 'nts:. on' -tr,-i*,e;;:.Bq-'bh:1i ltlb~n :-,ti:!~y ',;IlJ;:'e .:~ga te~ b5
-.:.>_....."" "_"_ :"~ ',,' '.".,..': " ~ n ".,..... .._.._.'.'_"" .... '. ....., _ ............ . '''.., . ::' .... .:'.'. .. '.'. __ . _ ..' __.':--. - . .', . - ...' .: .... "
";"";",=,,,c;D'''''''''*,\';,oo.~'ac;b;i,ke'path. ;He)misiJ'l~rF'~t.~~--tB~; ,;r;eeygJ.._j,Dg",~~J-ht;i;.~
='-, -.. =~- ..-'..- to.mean-wJ\ere;they. were frQllld"tl.<ai~";kQc;:atiQ!l..>,-~~4.i..j;bg.j;-
",.......,"'t~~e-"\9.f..;the "seven tinr:ts'~aili~'~t-o'ifrc:;J1i>nd "~l'e"'!:llu~<;>r5h'il:f\~~",,,Pcr
.pecr'facil i ties. He noted;~hat'o'.tlil..~Y:",are with-i:-n:~-;;'1pg;t-,$; C'
to' !;llmost all neeessary'fae,i1itiesand questioned';,j:.heirf' ,'.;
seore of one out of two eomm.ercial.suppport points. They
ca'nnotprovide any employee housing. "" .-....,,"
t&'i.'l"..if}t~5D~ Q;";i!>.li",eJiJ.:<, ':,~~:diGfl\:Ic k>Bratrd.tfe:l'j.:--,the-r.e .a~itK;:lcOt.iLQ.~d:i;.rie~gi.ti."1ii l:>ihef!'!;:.tbi1'~t::,.Q,
.. ~v .,.:.. ~ ,.. ". ,.;..;... ",., -"'-;-"i1ll:v-e"'to\boinpar'efh~i:t'p:toJect vrH:hother dissimilar. appJ:i~ ,.
t:,"",'-"!:1"'" .ca:t::ions,...He felt it unfai:!",,;:.t:Q.rc,<>ppli.cglJts in the;i*-,::4d?;~IjeC':
",,,,,".,,..,: 'to' eompete' withapplicants,)in~ the-reS'il!lentiaJ....~Qn~;e'::fie,";,::,,:
-... -" a~(sO':,fie1.t:'it unfair for' ,a~l~p;pl~q.<tnt ::tQ::haYe:;;eS'ar-att.1F~j,:l:;e@:
%:f.?&:r;',ithlild.r: prog€c';t:,:;-:uFler.-no\itM' t~j;,rt.b.eJji"'Q~ld be w~Ar,*;iin1itj.j':i:'"
to sell two or three. units .at fa.ir...l11arket.'rat.es:..,- the re'" .:-
. maining units .to be rent.ed ,.a t employeehou!';,tng, s.j::gjlda,!:d;;"
i",:-zc(')'.l..'., ........." -=..." "fGir;;.;fo.u;r,;.or.. fiVe. ye~s~ iRe;. gav-e., tuhs..'notes...for..thera"ecorCl....";:
;f
fJ,t}~'(1'OIi}!
S:~~~1?~
~"'"
1i:~~(~t;t'n,~ t W'3'
~ijj~!~"5W' s,;.,rG:a;l~M-et,','-'''''m:r17Y ,,'1OaW' g'avet-he" pres.eht<1<]o;i9'n"t*,<,Ile,-,2,s1:!;bJq;i;,t;t~dcg c:m~lll~g4;j;~ii,::'
.. 925 Durant the reeord. The projeet is a total of 29 units; 16.at
.' .:.'.::C' .;..';:'.::.~L,:-"i:'.;:~'''500 S'.' 'Galeha, free mark~t,.uni:ts C'il1l}g;:<:;!I)e "'e1))pl\l:>ye~m'flUa\j{~~:.:::
'.'. .: '. '.~u~.itt and the 12 remainingi:\jll~t~1;;~Sd.,Qwlj;nGQ!lle:!?t~j,9;;.\lljlj;lt..f.lc-
<:h",,". '''law€> ''!iC'.!''.j'at:::'9i2 5';Dllr an't';:" .. A t5 O'O"S ~''-Ga'1'e':a.a7',:r~-bey . have lIl<!l)~i!l1,tzl!!g H,he."J;!
open spaee. They hav:e used only8~%ofc.i:h-e"po-s--sible FAR,
-- ::, ." ..925 Durant uses only 6,0%. .~hl!!.:.GQ.l~nq:S.tr~~J;..,.p-:toj~9"",",i,l?,.~,.
i!r.~l!i) ie.ild,'';OiO,':sei'veCli,by'a' :si:X'incn':water,cl'i$tE!"'<n3ttlJ. tWej): ~Q,jj:?'ce-1lteDy.<iltfl-~tWS:1
"".~. '~~'.""Ma:rkal,.u1;las";foreosees no def.,i,ciene.}es; j-r,TheH'>ewer. ,1.iIDoeeis;,;e;ic,"'c
eight inches and !-'larkalunasforesees no problems there.
As far as 'fire protection, there isaecess on three sides,
,i,t is. a completely sprinkl..ered S.tl;'\Jc;.j;:gJ;.,.". Bn<;1.,the:'!.:-<;p;g,,:
providing another hydrant., The majority .9fparking i~
undel;ground with the rest landseaped .with berms. They:ar-e
JUO' feet., from the Rubey PaTk statiC1!'l;V Pol:ice"'-p'l.'o:Pe<:::ti~l'l~'"'""
there is aecess from three sides.and they are less than
., ohe' minute response away frOm' the' station. They t..ill. .ais0 0
provide a private security service. Child eare is pro-
vided. They are near the ei ty bike routes ,. Rec:ye,ling is '
provided.' They are providing. ramps, ete, so there is
wheelehair access to every unit from every:parking..space.
They are 1/2 bloek from the ..co1!lIllere.ial core fQ):'cOl!'1ue:r:-
cial support.
'". ~''''''''_.''
.,:;;~':., -
;~ .:<" T-c ~ ,,~~, Th ';.-
:. ~.' .;-,--- '.:::':.'.;.. ',",,':;",
At 925 Durant, the arehiteetura,l.,p..,J;Qt.otype is, the\..QQQr;leJ;,,,,
,.,; n'r,.. 'Street"L6dge;which haS just. Beel'l"g'iven national ~ee0gni-,.
tion for its archi teeture.. 'they. .VlUJ... b.e _t.gxget~d "t<:l~l?-+d ... .
the L()\V I'ncome Employee ($.4QOO,-:$.7QO_Q,(Y.I'..l." I't;:VlOU~d,il1()use.
2ifEiiilployees. The, uni tSCl'r'e'425-sq..&t. and the '0Ce-1;lp,aI1~~.~"
;WSu'Id'p'ay approximately$[!'1Q;Qv.1~a~fdt-Ja.eYhi:~:har.:~l thl?0i9~,tP,{h, ,::\
'They' intend toconstruet theseunlt.s'- be.fQt'e.,t.l1ey,.bli!j..J,g~ttl~;j
. units' at 500 S . Ga.lena. 'l31~:wat:;er:i'e' ~J~I'vedd}Y: a 6;".c;!i<?-iI1...--.
;.:,:-::;;::- . ..,....:-::--- '1;;he . sewer from anS!"l!lai'n:;;:"po't;n.,;adj <j.G.'en:t:J;:.o .:the:p~qje!?.t,:
} '::: 'f.larkcll una s.. seeS nodeHc .i:epci.e,$.....ilill.,;e it.~ "n 5t<:11:' ~ge",Iil:J;'9.'i;Il"'1 "
~~~\?I);"i~;(? ...;.g:;'0,,!.,~ ~'.~"f";>-&:"",i t ag~':fs:ha.ndled:0ti.;;':sf!1i e,,:'r,>a.jZ.k:il@lli;s, i\P:r;:~'V i:JjI"ec:i1; i 1;[;I>t h ?:g:;~e~Iili(; b ;i,
f:k1\~ j '3:{lA:; '.'.'. '.',.....0 : ::i'("iG'",,':fJ:"bni-t:h~:'an1:iY;< Fii:re'prpee~l;;i.~,:,th<;l'l;"~. i ~ 1'qNe ~,~~r.:..g.Il!:Lf,;\9
!,*"in~1JiiL:;:. : '. . ,s,ti~;l],~;:i,.,;:i... "....:s;;i!de. "'.s"aria. t. 'woe ad...'3.' :ac.. eti..'ti;i'fiY. 4.. '~a:):it!$.".i".t?r..Il.e:c:,s t.tt4Ci t;\!;:!',e' .i,\$ ,1C. .:!e<:t ~h'.
f,:;';.i:"');'};<:r;.,;q""",.:,: .;-":.'J:~sp:tirikl ered;."'Road .,.. and<3~d.kl?::;'De"t<hi<t<::C:~s S Rio;s, d90~~ i i,i~1?U,,!:41<ft;:
,':'"~;"j;:;,""""";-:' --".:,.:-" ,'ijrii f.s-geher a te:;Ies s peop lE':;'d :,P:fle,l;'<JY ~GoG;I}<Se.~"9,;t .j,,QQ:~~;$' 'l\l~#;"ti
,J;G"'\11:,!)~f;,, ,',,;,;,,l,,,l';",!,-,JQT,i, .;';,J.m~zl?d'; EfifoughsQU thf ac fi-1!jtri~.ii;J.ts.J':r:i;.li!l~1!Ill~ti;Ql(l;, f1il1;ii1:igJ;'Q~ViE!:~",.,
<,,,d . m1:Hi1liiHYexterio'rwalls;ele..c,:t:l:m-,i;.t:l ~ctt,r.-qW t:inled: ,re9:~:f;i:~~~; 11
..,."....-. -
<:'''''.-'<.'..li-'''
'..I'".-:',,':t'..f",'~
A- ~ ""~'~""""
-." ":; ~
~,h.p..a-fi:t.:-5., ..
.. .
.'
~.
-.,
"
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
'("'101 ~~ . <:. ,. lI',rr M r I q. 11. It I,,> 1:'1.
Special Heeting
]\SPOil liJ'<iii'"r;II1.S'c-illK~ go n ~rng
100 Leaves
MarCtl-TL;~~ me---'
" ... TheY are 350 feet from the..b.\lSstoRL1 1/2 minute walk.
child' c:are is provided. 'ihey a.re 1inJ~ea to the sic1'i:!walk-.~
.... .. system and' 6:;0 feet from theUt.e)\yenue 'l,'r.ail and f,;'iQ Ke@t..
','~C<=.7< ."'.c'."."...,....., -.,~. '" G'''' "1 P. k ". l' " '-'S '~€ '';;'',.7
'" C'; "~~,.;__.'_'. . .:. " .,.. .L.:'-"'!'!' : :.Ll;)r'y.,.Q"e . ar_.,'"e~ ,,1l']'gC?:l'S P'EQ;\!1Qe~}. 3I~""""l;!>.:t~~,
~f~~~'.~~i';;;:~!~;~:~~~~:'P~::~;t~.!~-Y~2~~~-::S ....afe 1 a t:.'~~61an<<l~l'r,"~li,JfQ~~.h@!Jil"t,iCcli'!P~,tt~q.~J;~k'f~
.'~.--."'.'-."'. '......'...,_.... "-'-"."~.'."~'~"". 'are"....'. .1"/.... ". ,,'loc. T_"-,,,~.o-,=,.t""a~l-""""-" '''e. a.ske'" ....h~..t. ".ho.
,;:' -:~-._- - _'~d~" .' d,.a:... --<- --,' CJ: .t!ti::.t '...:J...' l' t;. ..,,'- 1\:;-0;;> l:;;..':~:1f:'~',;ai' ;.l::_7X~:__~c_,_',.~~;!:,>,;.:~::q;..,=-~ .:_o~ :~ ~~*"'"-,,,;,-tr~~. _'~a:
"......"""'2..A.,.,-~.,C'.."::..".~""""<i-::.~..,,..i."''B. ''''a.r'.......e'o' n' s' ""a' "'.r"", b.'o.... n" ;:'5 """';n......,. :C~r "''''';'5 ,,,,';'~.,,,,,,~... ," , 0 . l' .." ','
, u \,J, " .J,:; 'W' ",'", 'u '>,'i:'"",..L; '-.bl',;;r-:.:.....~:'''''':_:,;;~:~~~if',_:'.~'r~.~J:~~;~..~"..:;t7..'l'X:~-''t~~~...P~=-~rl
,~'."'
r~;t1:,
m~\i:_i::.~,I"~,,
---.....~.._-" --."
__;."~,~'{'" ,_h@,_.""",.,,>,:.~,~, ' ",' '" ", ~ ,",," ' ,~' " , ' , "
". ~.:4. 'c.O~J."iI1'S': i'l'sked !lowt.heYW9.q'~gi prov i;.c;i~ "",hi 1<;J, "'?':r~. .~.;:;.~9;l,'lBjl4,~i;
. -"". '. .'---__.tliey provided the"""Sta t~ ._:r;~,1Xiked1'.spqce f qj:: sl;l.Hq,%i~,~iw"'ii;,
. Baranl~o asked why tlley combined these two locations:' Yaw
sa'id it,,,asprirnarilyto ",L:cnTide emflleYEilechou:;;i"g.,,,..,:.c,,,,-,_
Schuhmacher a$kEiatrow;.theY.~\'i'.QlJ.l.c'l..cR~Qv:j,<:1~ recyeliIlg fac~li-'
__,:.:.. 7,'.i~,,":Yes).. Yaw said therewbuM,)2G fQ1,1+: i:1;!;Dg Q!Lthepi~~'is.g~~,~,~.
"?'~""-'"'" .""".....,,;.,,&-"q~ i:Or "'lass, t.iil""aIv:mii:i\Wi;l)"ancii "'an""'" wl;r;"'h",,,,,,,,"'l";:,,be.,,-~.i_=..,.
,J ,',' , , "'~,,"" ;;::;_..J:"<-~~' ___,,1':!y,...~'";'t1!"\,_~.,.,_",,~,..~l'<lS,j,""-
picked up by truek on a regular basis. .' ..
~'. - .
. ;..i4;;@,~~.~nol1jh "":,"~=''';'.:,~:,,~L~p;:~ p~ tes., ~ad~,~i1e, :t5re'se,ntat~on, . ,He '. f~)"t'~theY'.Sb;Oj.lld;
!i€, ~,.'Ap'a'rlCm~ts'"'~o;''''''' "'''''''';. ha~" mGr ~ . po.J::n:E s 'on. water~~;V'j!;c.e... -tie. ne'tg'1l. ~a.K",.t.he"'ei.'><""
,;:::,:,'k~, C"_~. ^',"',-,__.,__ _"",,': ~~"~",-7,:':::"',;:"-;-'."....".' ,1:~_,.,~",.,....""__:",, '. ::"":,"", ':-,,'t":.,.,.,.,'~, ::.,~:.-";",-,.,,, "'~'''''..,".':):t:f....,...''t';.~~~;...i~'i;v;'~'';:~
..... . , .. if{'~iil eight: iilch line fonsel<ler servieeand; felt...the1t..".~":,;,,;,,
"'."" should have,mo~ points~h,:,re also., He, said that there..,:"
1 ;;;,,''';~,r, \-,as . no me~t1On' 1nthe '0I:cg"l'\alapp],1ca t10n that. tl;l~..!i?~~k::.
..,........ ing lot "1111 be paved. They feel they should rece1l.ve more
;~?"!?~m:s.:l:or the' roads.' Th~j';i9<Jf.~ <G~~s~:'.to.; th~L);lUS'~'~M~~~ 19I
. ,. "'ana' f ee1 'they"'s'hbu:td haVet'IDOre 'poinEs,.,awal'ile~the;r;!;!.l~"'1",!"e""31
'.' '. ... ..' noted t.hat he does not understand the Cti,e;; ()JPqltg~' s'
c~. :t~t; }ii;~~~~)~~~A~r";~:.,,~.~}~~fii~~ ....~.~ fi~~~~~a~r~~i~;~~:~it\~:~;~:::~~;:~:P::i~:~;;~~t ~~
. . ... on. the cornrr.unity.. and. IlO nee~ for additional ehiId cal:.:e~' .
The.. bike pathiS"-CIQseA:ncproximi..ty.and. they . f~el". they
,,_{':':~n',;;~:;~l'~:l':~F'~c~~f~t1,:,d'i~Ci a:F1 .,in~:~~~'"~~~~~t:]e'JlMIl5 W~];:J;nf,l'lfl~~t~~Elll;.f;l,.
UnJ::form BU11d1ng Codespg~;1,f,g:<).t.1Qn~~?!).~ feel thatcadaa~'-'",
tional handieapped faeili ties are not necessary.:' 'There. ::,-
are three ground loevel units accessible by the parking lot.
They 1 1/2 blocks from City Market and 4 1/2 bloeksfrom.
. thet.1all. They' feel they should have: more- Jil<Dints., .f9~e'?>--;"
commerciaLslipport._ -"They. will ~ellthe top three "nit!> ::ni.
at market value under a eovenant req\liring. the owner, .to, , .
lease with the six month minimum lease restriction and" . .
two week'exce~..".lf:M"'"l-o\<ler 'uni.;ts.')w~]'Jpe us.gd E9,L.
Moderate housing. They feel they are entitled to four
points-for--that,seGt;io.Q.. ' B.~~].lC:-01J;1:'gg@'Q.th~':Eloard to util-
ize their ability to grant 20%over.;j;he--,~*a.-for employee.
housing. They asked that'bonus POiIltS be granted. He
noted that one unit'wotrfd-beusedfo;r--a'llI:anagersuni t. :
H'equestioned thevalidi.ty oLappliQ,aj:i.QIlS .that, have,. .'
separate sites. He also had a problem with L-2 housing
Gompeting \<li th m-1F housing. He. q\les.,t4R-n-edwhether they
'iil'r;':' "" "., ';',c'" '".'~ou'1d apply the 6 month r13l?'tll[;!;,e&4g~\,tQ!,~-~ MiJ.Atl'l ','U8~' #'",i:!~,
felt that they should reeeJ::ve ered1t for t~e two eX1st1ng,
units that would be remo.v.ed.,..He-,.<U!.l>e~"tl;ta.t bonus. point-sc"
. ...q bea'iYat"ded forthemi1na9'~k~t1~H~. ~e'.noted,:,that'~1t~!,,~~:g '0.'
'pass1ve solar system reeei9>l!='gjl}Q P9;J,l'ltS',V,,-C"iii''',. ;i
~g?~'~r.~c: <;~~'::2
b.\~:,~~CPE:t~'i(;;;.;:' >:;i.~.~cc
- . ;~';i
.
"-< r~
):;~~.',r.,.1l..
~,_, ~ ,,-.- ~c.:.. .
."..',_. ',-,
,
:':t-:"A'.U.,,:...l.l~"TI'J_ ""~
:;,..'., '... ',~_..... ,~~"J ""::.."'_~ ~'",.
l-j"..,.,...
~'.'''''' ')~.,,'l"..
'SP.;,~,,?~
. 'bitraslted what t.heir pas?~ve' selar. system is.. H.iJ..l.e.;r" sMii:
''''''''''''they "'11ave' "of:E"'SEl't.the': hOu$.~s. ;'to'l.'eC~~,!ecB:"'.!J.t.lhf'~c;i~g",S;lJ.n .n
.
~if;S~f'r~~~:".S~i~~'f-~'f:;~~d-,.J;'\~;*:~~~~~.~O~~p~$~~~~~.~~~'f~l[~~~~i~9i~ttfi:}~q\;r~,~~+,c~ft~" ~~fi.l1;.,,~
, :." ";C,'.'" ;.. '..... . .:.c:. C'," !, ",'- ..,'pre-sentat'J:on;"ne. 'ne'ted.l tl'!aji;,:'Efl:~M-,.wQuldBEOM.a.~",;r!?~,~~!.'iL:l'A'ls-.,
!;;";; ~~:H,;.!...;'~r~~(i ~i~:<S;\~:~:!'J~i h$;'~~i~l1'.' tlras:)flGt' ftet~~'~ J~h~~!(:~~~9:!,n~J:i ~Ri?~~~;!6iji\~; &~.
..",.. ... >,: : "". ,""";'Ue !,lbted that the >UBCdoCs",nQt;n,~qji:h~ehap.(h;!.gap'R@4"f:~9FJ;j,€,(
"0" .'~ "'". c," ;:''';t;!l:~~'''li~'(prbYi<'lecFin('tR:i!s~~~j;e~:li. pr~l;.i eJ?eltffSt~9if.fz;B&~J;:Yf:,.'
,,: 6r,' p.f~iee . space prtl~ide'\5~qli,,:, ~csrHi !f~@~(!> pW~v~~c~;;$:~' . "" j
, wiLt be Oilgreund "level: aM lqC'il>lilse~bi!i~,,;un11e J.~~etS~fi}?e~":q!,,i,
.
A.
-.,
"
. '''~ccnn }fccting
.U'__"'"~"'.'.,~,'.' ".
AsE<i.n~_Iunning_ and Zoning .
MiH:ch 14, 1
~"~
.. _ _ :shqulc1 re<;:eivt'.:)!llQtepoin'ts'fOr 'this. There is atob:ilco:f
";,:",,. 'c,lO",units,; 7 market units.'and: .iJ.";low co;st--emp;l:oyC'e A~1dUs.irl.~'"
units and 2700 feet of office space. It is loeated at th
corner of. J\spen and Ilyman. The strueture will be setback
and'lowto reta,iri the viewplane. There will be sQlar
'heating for the domestic water but not for spaee heating.
"h 'c, "'~' ",the.l/\<'\,tpr i,u1 $W ;i,l1, po-,pr...ie,k ,:-sh;ingJ..e. roo:f and ':ced,aJF s,id.i~
He noted that there .wilFbe no potential for additional
.buildout. I1ELnOted .thati"looey".aL'e providing.:,rec'~c1'l'i1'l'<rF~,,,
facilities. . .'- .:.::::"::, ......., "'..
~,,*.'l.1- :':''''J;;ll".~);~~?~ ';''':
....".,-"".,;...
'-',.~"",~~...-'~.
~~';-0\1;l!:'::""",;;:-c;.~c-;~;;,=-;:z;:c.""-"".-,'B?ranko.,, as.ked. :.about,....thei.?~~.l~i\e~1;l';i;i~en:fi:;s;'iOn."-ham<i'~~d-'.Q
S,=:,.;,,,:-.~" - _ - :'f,acili ties. Nutta~-l-<sa:t~Mf;:::..',.t:ifere:?',are:':-~sta~ds':~dTte<;:7::;::
--~ _-~..I!I"-~t,;,mee,t.j& ,obtG!in G!:hcr:~,1J;ti~qfretmi t:;;:;L~y- rila.:f~;;lijx?~:;;;;
. :ceeded but only the -bas€"l!'E!qU'irer.teI'fts 'ar~'i'nee.es-sa::t.'p"c:c"~''''''''-=
Nicholson said he is prd\l'j;~d:tITg"'ham:hdappedae'C'e-ss,,'tcr-.t1iro
levels and three living units. .
~.=.."'" .""".....' "_"~',""C~
. -"'>~"""',- ",:. -.
..,J~huek.Bral)dt asked ,thes,ta.-tus.,.o,f,'llonus.'po.int&~" ,:Ka~,'sa-i4
~, _,the "q:r;:,ig in<\l .rec_Ql1)II)ejlcla,J:;i~n ',w-asJ J.to. -drop ,.bon.us"'Poi;",kS: ca.-ll-.;
together butP&Z.haddecm"d;e'l:l'ttr i-etaih- "tn-er& aI'l'd 'I1avec"-:-'
striet guidelines on their application.
YC:\"";~'_"';-'''''':;;''''_'';''''..,.
:~"r).l.' ~"
. '..'
, ,,-Top,-
(."~"" '" .
~:f1:Y\'~'~~' ,~
of!'1iH
t,t:}.',::,>:'.
,>Larry Yaw gave the pres Eln't<rt:ion';,' ';They '-<free ::propos,.tng;:26
:_ ,"".,.,,,,,;if' ' ~., . ,,;: u,p,i,ts;, .10 t:re.emarket ,\:loli.~)t%S;r>:Fnd l'[ a: '-'lowrr:t.J!fd!6llie ~m~~ ,;,."
units. They are using 6S%,"o'f tneir possib.le FAR; They
have maximized the solar properties, privaey, ete, while
minimizing the visual impact.:' 'The 'strueture is-two . level:
using wood, stone, and exposed beams. He noted that they
." _ _ ",' ,.,will.:Q,eeonnec:: ting .Hi 1l..:a.'1'ra }49:n<o:C'h::S.t.: av:h 1011 ",,:i;:lJ;;Jt -:H~F4'$i
, the' aeces s in the area. "I'T'heYe "i'S' a: 'new' '8 '" 'w'ater "':bi'xi:e' 1ie'-
tween Mill and tlOnareh Street which upgrades the pressure
'and dependabil i ty of the' ::t'in'es . ''!'ne sewer risan :S"'''''llne /'
f:!J:' #; ':,:t.l).:~"Js:to rIll. ;(:lra:i nC\:<Je? it$] 1h.."rldl~Cl;)N\ s!i::t--a:;ca c.'!'he!-~:f i<t".e', dS.#t:i!!mP "
has been upgraded with..thenew water line .and' ,a new hy-
".drant. There .is access on two sides' and .the",strcucturecc,c",,"
r,~ :C6~;ID 1: 'iJ"'~s ..-c9mplete:1YJsP:t:'inIUer;~.q,~. ~~in~F ~'iis :;dompJ]e.-itfu I'1',~.fr')ia;
- underground. There wilL be snov.'lUelt used at the entranee
They are conneeting Mill and Monarch Street whieh will
upgrade the Bus system aceess ~n the area. Theyhave
added a bus stop on the eorner. Police proteetion; they
have aeeess on two. sides andthe~!oop will improve such
access. Child eare is provided. Bike paths are inpI-oved
w~th this extension. Reeyeling is provided. Handicapped
faeilities are provided by ramps and elevators such that
there is wheelehair access to all units. They are 3 1/2
blocks from the CC Zone. The e~ployee housing is geared
toward the 1m, ineome employee ($4,000 - $7, OOO/yr.) .
The studios are 360 sq.ft. There is parking, laundry
facilities, storage, and individual balconies with solar
o;rientation. This projeet could feasibly house 24 em-..
ployees at a rent of $175/mo. They intend to build the
employee units before they build the free market units.
He asked the Board to eonsider bonus points for this proj'
~C', Y.",,', "''''', , . eet;. "lie also: asked", th'a'p,eP;&>Z ' 'I1ec0nim'endl ,c,fucCouWi'C' il,."tiha-t'(<<,1:',
projects that have low income employee housing be approve,
this year. '
"l....
14 ;.~;~.
<.;.". -.
tEl1i,z.."'~j
~ f'; l:::
.
,
'-:\.,;f,.'.-~n",:;r r.'c~m:ilrj{i':~,~/i
.- '
Baranko asked if they intend to submit to rent eontrols'
and if so, how. Yaw said they are far below rent-eorrtrol,
and they would be willing to offer thisprojectto-the--..
.:..:... .. . City to. manage throug11tlte..housingauthc)':d:ty:'.K<in-e:'.a;s:ked-
....."... ,."_',.""W'" ii; tl:).eY intend EO-constrl,let the road eonnection....."Yaw sail
t":'l:;~' t:.:'lIimJ't:'t!'".tt";'ik;~r"it6,lBY w~ ll,prQ~i.qe,,:the:.ROI.f',,<linCb.c:c:m$"lliCt:,<'tlte!(.ut:i;l;j:'t!:i:as '1Co'1.1ot'"
,,0,:,i!i!t'Y!'i j :tlJi:iii C5Fj . 'l.:,j'qfu j;;i:'lhC:idj :"T~eYtwi::!;,J,.c.pmply.wj;th, .tnEi\~ubdillv-isi;ol}'lJ:i:eqti.i::t€~ih~oti i.ti'~
~; ~c'
"
r~
[
\':i
f
,
Il;,
1"-.
-.,
.'
""~1>pch~<lr~Me()ting
.""_-'.,.~"",~..- ..
. . ,~A~~cn Plunn'ini] and Zoning'
Murch 14, 1
;tn.~:1:
.. .. : shqulc1reqeive !l1Qre poi,n'tsf6,l:' this. There is a'tOti:l1.Qf
'i';">l",.",l,~Lunits,; 7 market ,units.cand:,i3.Dlow c(i}sl;..,empcl'oyC'C ,j~YouS'irl~'..',
uni.ts and. 2700 feet of office space. It is located at' tt
e6rner of Aspen .and Hyman. The,strueture will be Setbact
and 'low to retain' the viewplane. There will be sQlar .
'heating for the d.omesticwater but not for spaee hei1tiirg-:
", "'-" '. ,",' ",:rhq I1\q.t,~.r i,q.l sw),ll, PO- ,br.,i.c:::.k ,,-shingJ.e. :r;OOL and ;:ced.aJ; s,.idi48
He noted that there will"be no potential for,i1dditional
build ou t . IIELJlotedthaPtJ.he~t" are prov idin~~reQc;p:~;,cl'i'tll}'.,o~
faeilities."- . '-',,~
~'*.'tr- :''';J:<t.~:i;';'':!JI~''::l .",," '-":.' ~"
''$'_I,:"~.., ~"""""";;.,"i-,"",
'--', ',-' ~,~ ~ " ,--
. .... --.
~~,cw"'~ ~ . " ;C~ ':'..' -::.'-:::. -~ ';C'-- c . .. Baranko askedabout:tl1e'i?~'~~~~mllent;s;':On'in.anGf;~<ic;:;',
cc_,., ~ :.. f aei 1 i ti es . Nutta-ll':'satl:t":-:"l;;Iiat:;c,:'.t::trere"are'cStcmdar'd'S':.'::6Ii-e':::7.::-;
..~.I!l1-ll;it,.meetj:'Q pbta:i..n, a'..b.uc~,l!:tirtl:J';-.:p:etmi t:~'..~y.. rila.~~';e.li-:'F,,,,t
" ,.. : ;ceeded but only the 'bas'a'f~qu:1i:ireI:teIft:s" arEh11eC'es'SGt~!"Xc"=:'=
_. .._~,. Nicholson said he is prcWil:'ii'ng'chantlieapp-ed 'ae-ce'ss:"eo"'two
levels and three living units.
.,. ., ..c;h,uck.Brandt asked,t;-hestaWs...o.f,..Qonus"poont&. 5"~"said>
... _ .__.. ~.' ..th,e"C!;:;i g i,nZll ,.:t;',eC_Ql1)I1)e.nclat;;ii~n '.:waSFto. .drop .-bon.us.'..po.~ts ~~l J.;.:.
.-.....-", ,together but P&Zhadded:':k'd'l,ar)'t'GI- t-etaih ..'tli'"€!llii a"n'd ;ltctve~-'"""
strict guidelines on their application.
;.-r:;,:..~;;..~..,_~.....
k~:,.""~
...."... .:: !,l'op.. of !,1il,l .',LarryYaw gave the presen:tai;.'ion-;" ':They '.ar:e :cpro,!?-os,3:;;Ji:g<:26
,S"""r,J;.t""j ,! ",A",",' ".:,,>c:",~",'Y' ,..,;,,,,,uJ;) i,1;.s;. 10. f're.ema"ket ,un1il;@.g;.ra-nd.llJ.6:lJ;o.W ;r;tlhdl6r.ie ~~q'~ ,k.",
. units. . '1'hey are using 6B%,"(j'f tl1edr possible FAR: They
have maximized the solar properties, privaey, ete, while
minimizing the visual impact.. 'The'struetu:re is"tw6 levels
using wood, stone, and exposed beams. He noted that they
., ...._..., c... .,:wilLl;:>,econnectins .Nj.ll.,~ J1.q,n~h>S.t.: ;~"hio.h :1Iri:.;JiijPj;~--<o'\t€
., t:he . access in the area., -''Ther-e- "i"S' a: . new" ..8 '" 't-rcfter ''''1'i'!'fe :be'-
tween Nill and Honarch Street vrhich upgrades the pressure
'and dependability of thEn1:'in'es. ....Tnesewer.'is'an 'S"':"lineF
f ~ :.'" : ":f;l:r:E2,,,,,s..torm ;d;!:f!,i nG\;g'!:1" is! ;ft<'irl'dlS!€t':;~lii\ s'Ji:'t.~,l',a cf.li'hEt sf i~.edS..y;Si.tf*'!'ffi r $: j
'has been upgraded., with.the new \>later line and'.a net>l hy-
", drant. There .is access on two sides andthe_;str.ucture",c....~..
"o,;;t'!;Ii:;;-'1;.;tL;6r,';t;;et '!I,f.tsco",ptel;!e;l:y,sprinkl,,:r'~.ec~e s~irig':jis ]colllp13e.>tfu Jf:r,-0:~a]
. , underground. There will be snowmelt used at the entrance.
They are eonneeting Mill and Monareh Street which will
upgrade the Bus system access ~n the area. They have.
added a bus stop on the corner. Poliee proteetion; they
have aceess on two, sides and the loop will improve such
aeeess. Child eare is provided. Bike paths are inproved
,with this extension. Reeyeling is provided. Handicapped
faeilities are provided by ramps and elevators such that
there is wheelehair aecess to all units. They are 3 1/2
bloeks from the CC Zone. The employee housing is geared
toward. the 1mV' income employee ($4,000 - $7, OOO/yr.) .
The studios are 360 sq.ft. There is parking, laundry
faeilities, storage, and individual balconies with solar
o"ientation. This project eould feasibly house 24 em-_
ployees at a rent of $175/mo. They intend to build the
employee units before they build the free market units.
He asked the Board to consider bonus points for this proj-
'''1r:n,;rf'(''"m't;,'"""y; "<,,,. x,,,,"'rl-'" .eCi/,t;. ....!lealsol asked"tha';t;]:i:P:..$. 'recC1ltlim'Elndb't:o":co1n'fcril";,.fijh-a-t:'--a-:'I:J!>,
projects that have low ineome employee housing be approyed,
this year. '
i.j;
"'k :'.';~,
-." ~"
,,-, -.
~it~',;.,i~ ..
" .
;. ,.;":..';';' -~:.;;.... ;1..,';: ' ~
Baranko asked if they intend to submit to rentcontrols'-
and if so, how. Yaw said they are'far below rent"c::ontrCYls
,and they would be wi11inq to offer tl1is project to the-..
,City to manage throughthie. hClusingautho:rj;:t.y;-:K<rn~".lliS'.Jfed- ',::
','. vI. .i.,t theY intendt'6,vconstrl.lct the road connection ......Yaw-said,
j::~,,1-;;MI,!?y will:,Rl1:p~v.:i<ie;~th"e.'.RO;i'l"'i$ld; 'c:dn~ucrt1<tlte;<t1 t:iili.:i"."tt'ilas' ~;:t$\:~
"~"';1q\J jdi"h(('I'(bl,.TbeY{W,i):,lc:pmply;w..:itllh'dl'n;EhE&tlbdt;i)~is;i.'Gln,..' ]J:\'eqliti':e~1S:'::o:ri i.t'ihiiiS ~
,~ ._.-.....,.....~.
z;;,,0~j,'f~ihrjiS-'S~i
,
".....,
~,
" :.
~ ,. c ~.
.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
l,jarcft'Ti!, 1'9~
fllP""~ c, r. w,rr,ll'rl II. n... I. 1;_1.
Sp.ecial Neet1ng
Aspen Planning pnd~on~ng
.._ . U' ."
._~-,..,~....';","
.Ru.ssell Pielstiek, gavc the presentation. He submitt.ed-ac
docuRlent for the, rJ:lco:r;:4., Ue noted-tha,t there was SO!:1e-
misunderstanding, with the original applieation .''1'111$1$
-a land' su-bdivision. '~'hcy willsupp-ly"an'c3"--Materline..:-
Markalunas support"C<l this' upgx-adc. --'rhere-arc,r.larrho.les-c,-'
on' she fortne sc\/cr system. ' 1'he-stornt'4rainaqp-will
be arranged wi th _t.ha_Ci,ty_ ",Engineer_-'-,s. _approv.<1J..;_'!'herc__:::;-
-are hydrants existing for fire protection. H_clra:d--i1;o-::<,
_comment on p?\rking. The result of vari.ou.s. meetings-:nn
-the road aceess is they are. to supply a 22' paved'-Sl:lrfaee
and a 30' total easement. It has taken 3 years to obtain
the necessary easements. : ,They have-no p-l.acns.-:,E'or,:erterogy'.:-.
. ..They_ ,are beyond the determined' d.istance<f-or po-in.ts'underc-
itransportation. There iscaccess from ;two"sides.f-Glr~L,~-,-~~
:police protection. They :willnotpro~:ii::!e:cehilrl;::t'at:e:'.' "'-::'
The bike path is near this -property. Recyeling-,-ri-1J:--rrot--
be provided. Handicapped faeili ties will.be only- \vhat
is required in the UBe; They are within walkingdist,ance
";_;_'~; __ _ ,'"' 2s'!'l:o-..,ttte:;commereial district',;";'i'he apoli.cant riS"'a!sking 'foTS
,an R-15PUD. They have reduced their originalapp-l:icatioi
from Si.l:\:. lots to, five lots. ,,'l'hePlanning,Office' had
reeommended that the aceess- easement'- not.be: incl.udedin
the property to insure that the road remain a private
..:road:. Th~ applieant eannot list a price:.,.;r,ange.-o:f:.:.the:::.:::,
'" ~"." ." ,'"",.il:obS'.si:ncethe development.o'costs ,have not yet "be'limi. ~1r:'l-
mined. They estimate they~,ill be $70,000 plus., Each
-lot will have a single family residence, ~lith.a carets-,kex -
Un-LL\-Juu.L.... '1'0'" _j.)V'",_, l,:'llni:t .wi thin., T,he.car,e.taJ<.eil'ii unit- \.;o.u;Ldbec: ~,,"rd.@tien ,tl.nl t.
agreement with the housing authority. He noted that his
application was ata disadvantagesiI1oe-- i,t i,s..a-,J.-and
,'~" ,,'2:T~oUbditvisionandthey call1ine.:frba.cl1ietre' poifut'sl-:Q.:n 'a;J::lfi'$:'tara%i:e
other applieations ean. - .
~__t:;:'..:
Va.n lJorh
;:':U>~!,~:,-
,;,v~~~, .
';..
. ,-....-. --.,--- -
'_~-.'~' .:.::J>"" ~:;, g, .
~- '';'':''-' ,'-
~"1):i' . !?.l<z::ct:e";!',s
~'
l!tilll;t:,t.ih;iit;L E 'If;:'
Baranko asked if the reeent amendment, Ordinance 4, 1973,
was adopted to address such applieations. Kane said Yes.
Schuhmaeher asked, if there' are stil'l conplicatiol1's .d:lre-'
to zoning and subdivision regulations as-noted in the:
Planning Offiee memo .ofFebruary 22, 1:978. Stanford said
his problem ~ith zoning was that the lot line:s extended
to the center of the road. Bllis'note is-that if the
road remains private, this is possible. SChuhmacher asked
if there ",ere subdivision requirements -that have not been
met. Jories said the engineering eoncernswith access were
on Riverside Avenue. Stanford said another concern was
that t:/:'ail easements were not shown-dn---the-fflat':--Stanford
said they do intend to dedieate this and that it appe.ars
on a separate map.
10QC;,," Gt'"''.J1;k~'''t:.:U>><''' Xlle.. nex.t, ,two .app.lica,tions'IElre. ,J.QdS'e.,.applli.i.l::at-iolts~, L,t"" lod;;
'-c~,<:.rk~ ';:,~
Andy Ilecht made the presentation. He not'edthatthe --
Planning Offiee eoneern that a water storagefaeility
be. built will soon be a reaLity. Hesaid"the,exis.ti.r!9"_'"
,"_ "", '_"_" zse.w;er;facili ties \vill be utilized .I1e.n:oted...an.:amen:dir..e:n:t:l.
from the Planning Office showing that._they__have complied
..on storm drainage facilit:i'es';"dHefeex's"they'''q1ia:l'ifp: .toro'"
dthree points on fire protection. They.:h.ave -eJ..imi.nated"d
'z:,;--=:<,,;~,: 0:, ;" ',.ali);" ,cone erns froITl,:the,. P lan,n.in:g:c.o.f.fi:.c.e--.on:'i:/:'oads .;,j,<!llhe.'Y:C"i":i:-:;,j
'iqua1.ifyfor, :s;ix,::po.irits'onq:pulbii;~ 5f;,r.:an:spor,tajt;jjon di:x:tJ:ElS:d,;): i c'
.. .. c. ,'';1" i :" {' '.c,.bn':' ,the,caleulati Oll'S"o_ He 'de:fer:red'; :to'-, ;th'-e' !Cm.ef;oj),d>;olJdc.>eefi
i..:s:rt:JOllr.pblice: 'prote.ctio,n ..The~.~eic:J;q$.e-") it:Cl::ttne;confiller:pi:arJ.s,
:,district but do not, iJ:lprWebthe:: exi.:stitI:gdreveiJr"O"f-;"sexWi-iee,.,:
.;:He d:e:f'erred to Joe Hells on architectural des,i.gnc. : :;The,y;:;::, ..
haVE!,ohstructed no views,htl:1e materials are: sim:lli;aI'dto mDti
'Aspen Inn
",:'-..,.'''' ,.',., ,.
~-"""~-,.'_.~
} l~~~1Ci~~;;;::Z.rt.;'.~.
::11,:,;.tt0
i,:': ::c'
1",
.~.
" \." ......
Spee i.al ~.eetinq
Aspen-PLAnning and XoninL- '
Hateh14~T97
surrounding strueturcs, the building mass is redueed by the
use of wings, and t,he buildinq is setback. 'fhehave satis-
fiedthe :requirements of the Planning Office On site design
by aequlring the lunds iluj ucent to the site. 'I'hey are pro~
"tj-ICl'iR~t'7 ;"O'Osq .rt V rtl~rc, tf)1Hl j t;he7:r;cqu,ii);O~ Pf>\;'lk .,?p-e~,ifl))el1:ja
form ,of a eourtyard.ThE:ll.ltilities und parking urEi'under":
.._ ___ ;-:~". _--grotil1g.:" - ;rhere' is a:.ski~il};t't;'qil."IJenotedtha L~ey:are._ -
--- .-..... ,- '..2?"-3!?%aboVe the code '.r~(ltJ,j"ren)cn:J;'s.for,f\lel~P9ncs9:rYi3.$~;q~.;,,;.,
Hi:!'-a.i.i?.;r<;rE;edwith . the .. Pla!1ping,;().lifi<:::@PQ~.1lllen'\...thClj;: :J:;~- .
,~,. ;""""" "''''iC':';~'~ ~men.f'ties.wi11prevel;*t,'.-.'s.k,j,mqi!'i1n?i:,g:ei;;'t!-",i.<;>,ri!:'@.9!:=~ps.""",,:t,~~ .'El;f.""1
'--intend'te>dEldicate a sk.i....in-:;I:;railamollJ;1'P-i-l'j.g.;-&Ef<.o-~"'gi;-&Y.i,,,-::--
.~~ ~""".: 'J'''': ,. .,''" ."""'-"~ '!'. ',~ 'li::it.bf ,hand. to'1::ne '0i "toy ,. ;J~eople '!;lay lil,se, lUlitSl ;t:~ 8-i~p @lab, E'''
- '-~r.:."""g;;,,,.~i,2::' S;;:',;)Zt-'c" eaj;:i.t;,r';: access to :tift" l--Ah":'HE!l"fee.ls1::he:t shoulcL. att~:t$e
maXilll'i:frrt'f'O'il1:t"S.fur'''amerri:ties'f'O'r providing usable public
,. .._,.... .'" '> .' O:pF'n.:5pa<:e~. They haveno1; gj.,sturbed any public views under
!l'~t;)"-,, .0" ..,~.,;". ,- '0"" ~']:~'vi.suai,,"iIlipacLTb.ere:i's--14T(J'.OOf>~".ft, on rt:he,ma.in .fa:=<r, ,cr.o
":: '~',' ,., "."" d'e"Voted" to' ptil;>lici use. .o.' 'l'h;ere' is a-,r:estaura.ntI lQbh,h~ heali;
~p"~j;~~~~""l'3""~"9 e~'~ ,?"''f' 1df)~iHt~ e;5;( . .lounge, -sepaJ:"f~(ilj q:'o/~!~s~ng;,9'u~~€j..l~'-"iic'iiV~i\,~he:>!l'B"~;J,
" .. - ~"'- '-- - . be' available fo.r non~prb-f:'l't public.. use. at CQ.so.t...-.;-ifn.e.nea-ltn
".-.--:.. . fag,iHty' hassaUhasteam..,,>!l<?-13si3.ge.l.. whirlpool,.. and,,,le>f::k.er-
.,'-;!~" ..." .... _'_'. ?;"o. P~..:t~ . ...'l.'h. ere-is a 1. ana.'se1iped eou!-"tyard_ 'ilithoutd9~F'<?-'?tivi
,.....'.._~:'~'.,.. ';"". . ''4- .... , d d Th" A d th t ..
"S,,,,,,,';',,::7';'; . r .._,_,:.._.,.*e$i.~tung answ:J.mm1ngtj-ey "ave re",uce .... e., OU1!::J..,sl'-'i:
'" ""~"'>~"'r~i1'tal' sp~ce;They.Stippl'Yi'Qve:f1~~".qf tl1~,.,.emp,1QY~E>A.4-:th';;;
housih',r On site. They .co~ply with auto disinee'n'tive'tothe
ma:ll:imqm. l:lenoted that under .factors that were co,ptrpllapl
they have aChieved thema~imum number ofpo.ints.
l1t'1);.:i.;~.:\n~:l:~~f.>;:~, 1.
. ,:-.,..,.,~". . i;.
"~.r--
, '. ~ - - .-.
~:5-":s::n<~?"."-~')O ':' I;;';
iXl[,.tH.t<i i:a:-""r.;'o5fr-; ~_,l..
_,.:. :!<'l~r-;~f~!"? 'if the easemenji;:g;'1Raa - Been' aegu,ir.ed~,f,or"the:-,&kirnf'
cu'l'ation' improvements 0 vlells said they have beerr.-.acquireEl.,
:"'.' -'Mb'Un.ta:in Chalet
There was no representative from_ thi:!. HO,1.l,z:t!-aj,n Chal~;t'o,;t.l),eq~
"was no presentation given.....,.. ".-' '''-- --'...,....
C:e>llins asked for:..finaicQ;1!JIl]<;1Q.;t'i :J;;J;'Qfll::. t.!1~:.:"V?F:.~~Sc-;n~ferx::al :
ageneies. -...,,.., '.
Markalunas elarifiedthat the one million gallon storage
tank on the Aspen Inn applieation is not yet a reality.
He noted that the eontract_hi3.s'P€'lel1 awarded. -and,theremay..
be sorneproblemso'6:uring eonst.ruction:but. that .they.',J~eoS.ee,.
no problems.
.
.
Jones noted that on the Coe>per and Original project, their
problem with storm drainage is not the dry--weJ.ls, hut. the,
faet that theSl:te is lower than the street, making the
sizing and plaeement"of the drywellsdifficult.
The Board recessed for a 45 minute di.nner, break.
The Boardre'cxmvenedat8: 00 'PN for the scoring session.
Donald Ensign stepped dOvm for the scoring because of a
conflict of interest.
.._ ',,; ~ I "
Seoring.
The Board scored one appl:j,l=:eti9l)~t,i3."time inthe.e>rd"r of
presentation. The seores were a!? follows:
.
~ ',"J,..~...:,,...-,..~~,, . "~ ') ":'i"!'c'l"";h'~~::n"r:':': -
';'-..."'Aitdr.e:U r:ych ,-"-"C-hic';Collinsj 39'tcitiH, 2::!:!<i?nU!?I_ ~2;w}.t.w.'?bw~?}.); bC1Cl:t_s,,;)
'" :""::"1.';.. "'-' .-'-- Fran-k"Baranko; 35 total, S"bonus" 40 :with,b~mus: "5 bG!1us;
>:;: .. ..... .;:-:"We;l.ton Anderson; 35totaJ"1 b9nusr3G w;Lth bonus
, -- 0,,, john Schuhmacher; 35 totaJ:.,' no' bonus,- 3S.cwithbonus
..-Joan I<lar; 40tot.al, 3 boim~, ~);;wi.th:,bonus ";;-,l.,S,
!')i1i".rl~e'rage'toti:il ;';-nHs \;Ii-ehO~j;;~911gStc~.!l" ~ W,j.~ ,):;t.o!1;tl:l'f.,;,.
",'~ ::,-::,~;t
,
'.
'.
'., :.. !;',V
''''....~ r..', ."'frllrl A... .. I, C".
^.
1"""\
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
,100 leave.s
Barch 1-1., ,1978 ,
SpeciiJ.l rlceting
" ..Cooper 1< Original
,
500 S. Garena
925 Dux-ant
"n,;',. .,;
~j. ,
,j..
"',',.,",'-' .':',""".,.
" ,Goo.dnough
Apax-tmen,ts
".; "t.'d'aj['j{. 'Central
t'les.t
/' .','-,
Top of Mill
Van Hox-n
j~"i"~ j"'\'i>{" . -~, 11 .
Aspen PliJ.nningiJ.nd Zoning
Collins,; 22 total, ,1 bonus", 23"with bonus
Baranko; 32 tot<::l, lb..'0l1us, 33 with bonus
'An<lerson; 24 total, 1 hontrS'i"25 with bonus
Schuhmacher; 22 ,total, no"bQnllS, 22 wi'tlY bonus'
,Klar;:l3,total, no bonus,' 2'3vith bonus
'.,..'~'~,~ . .0:;,,;,) . \IV A.
"f.;',
':"~ I ;.,_....,.;:
Averag,eto tal; 24. 6 wi thou t-bonus, 25.'"2' \J :tt:h"oonus.,"':; ",cc "-
Collins; 39 total, 4 bonus~'~3'with bonus
Baranko; 29 total, nO bonus, 29 with bonus
Anderson; 43total"",6 bontl's:;"'1!l-with bonus' "',,~,""'"
Sehuhmacher; 3 9,to,tal, no, bonus, 3 9 ~;i th bonus,. H
Klar.; 40 ,total, 1 bonus, 4.:L;'Lw..ithJbo,nus ~ C'_,;..;;; ".co;.cl;;.::;.t;h '",I
:f} ~ ~.'
Average total; 38.0 without bonus, 40.4 with bonus.
Collins; ,35 total, no booo'sJ,.c313".with bonus
Baranko; 34 total; 2 bonus, '36 with bonus-
Anderson; 38 total, 1 bonus, '39,'lith bonus
Schuhmacher; 35 total 1 bonus , 36 ~li th bonus
Klar; 34 total, 1 bonus, 35 with bonus
Average total; 35.4 withou't"Wl1us,~36.2 withbonU'S'~;'-'h"",..,""
;)'=,:LJ,Ji:..t:;,;, ;_. -';;',7; "..:{j
Collins;j<1i39'total, 5 bonutS9J..~411:('va th" bOhuS
Baranko; 37 total, 4 'bonus; 41 with bonus
Anderson; 40 total, 2'15ohu'S';42 .with bonus
S:ehuhmacher;; .42 total, 2 &Ghuis;, 4.4: with bonus
Klar; 40 total, 2 bonus, 42 with bonus
~,,-,~. Y',)::.;. ,).: '-1 t!.; ,; \\d; i"
';
44
Average total; 39.6 without bonus, 42.6 with bonus.
Collins; 43 total, '-5 bonus-"d4.(3 with bonus
Baranko; 42 total, 4 bonus, 46 with bonus
Anderson; 48 total, 6 bonus, 54 with bonus
Sehurunacher; 43 total, -1 bonus, 47 with bonus
Klar; 48 total, 2 bonus, 50 with bonus
Average total; 44.8 without bonus, 49.0 with bonus.
Collins; 35 total, 0 bonus, 35 with bonus
Baranko; .32 total, 2 bonus, 34 with bonus
Anderson; 33 total, 4 bonus, 37 with bonus
BChuhmsP,he:z:'; 30 total, 0 ~tiTl1UIs.';" ';3'/)"'wi th bonus
Klar; 26 total, 0 bonus, 26 with bonus
I . ';h-1'H"i1} ::~~" .-::;":'
Average total; 31.2 witho'u,t. bonus, 32.2 with bonus.~f,rH "''C,
,
'"