HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.500 S Galena Ave.1978-PD-1
.
-.
, ...
...,.~,.~-----....,.-,------..~.."-,, .-,
___n ____ ___ . ___
Copland Hagma, w Ltd Architects PO Box 2736 Aspen Cola
81611 303 9252867
March 14, 1978
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Ci ty Hall
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: GMP POINT EVALUATION
RESIDENTIAL SECTION
Dear Sirs:
To reserve our option for further discussion with
Aspen City Council regarding exceptions we take
with methodologies, evaluations and GMP point awards
by the Planning Office on GMP residential appli-
cations, we wish to place this letter on the record
of P and Z proceedings March 14, 1978.
The following is a brief itemized discussion of
points we wish to be considered by City Council:
1.500 South Galena/925 Durant project
This project is a single submission comprised of
development on two separate land parcels. Evaluation
guidelines do not contemplate review method for this
type of project.
Planning office evaluated this project by considering
a single GMP catagory for both portions of the project
simultaneously, thus the total project point award was
reduced to the lowest point level given to the individual
project portion. This method tends to mask the merits on
one part and not give a true evaluation of its worth or
deficiency.
A more equitable method of evaluation would be to
evaluate each of the two development portions of the
submission separately and on its own merits in accord-
ance with GMP guidelines. The total point award would
then be added together and divided by 2 to reach the
total project point award. This would allow fair and
unbias point awards as contemplated by GMP guidelines,
yet would permit the deficiencies or merits of each
portion to average out the other.
Copland Hagmal
N LId Architects
Letter to Aspen Planning & Zoning Comm.
March 13, 1978
Page 2
2.Water
Points not awarded consistant with criteria. 925 Durant
Project and Goodnough project location separated by only
2 city lots yet were awarded different points.
3.Fire Protection
Points not awarded consistant with criteria. 925 Durant
project and Goodnough project location separated by only
2 city lots, yet were awarded different points.
4. Public Transportation
Points not awarded consistant with criteria. Only projects
that "improve level of Public Transportation Service" should
be awarded 2 points: projects that may be handled by existing
level of service awarded only 1 point.
5.Recycle Facilities
Points not awarded consistant with stated criteria. Goodnough
project awarded 2 points for providing recycling material
bins: other projects provided identical facilities awarded
only 1 point. Park Central project awarded 1 point and did
not provide on-site recycle facilities.
6. Handicap provisions
Points not awarded consistant with stated criteria. Different
point awards to projects that provide identical elements for
handicap. No point award recognition of projects that make
special (non-required) provision for the handicapped.
7. proximity to Commercial Facilities
Points not awarded consistant with criteria. None of the
submitted projects "in and of itself improves the level
of (commercial proximity) service in a given area",
therefore should all be awarded only 1 point.
Respectively submitted,
La~~,
COPLAND HAGMAN YAW LTD
JLY/lls
REFERRAL
TO: Asp'::n Fi re Di s tri ct
FROM: -Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
RE: Analysis of Impact on the Aspen Fire Department
DATE::
The Aspen/Pitkin Planning OFfice is reviewing a development proposal,
and requires an analysis of the proposal's impact on the capacity of
thle fi re department faci 1 ity by consi deri ng the abil ity of the Fi re
Department to provide fire protection according to the established
response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity
wff establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment
tID an existing station.
r
lJlre attached app 1 i ca ti on form i dentifi es the 1 ocati on, si ze and type
'of development. Please review the application and indicate the category
~f impact below. .
'coj"" 5'a>"i. ~ +- 91S 'P~4..;R-
Referra 1 Submission Date:. If( fC-c..# '71
The proposed project will have the following type of impact on the capacity
of the Fire Department.
1-:;
Negligible impact - substantial excess capacity
exists to provide fire protection according to the
established response standards of the appropriate
district without the necessity of establishing a new
station or requiring addition of major equipment
(such as hydrants, wet standpipes, etc.) to an
existing station.
.lJL
Moderate impact - only moderate capacity exists to
provide fire protection according to the establ'ished
response standards of the appropriate district
without the necessity of establishing a nel1 station
or requiring addition of major equipment (such as
hydrants, \'iet standpipes, etc.) to an existing
station~
~, .
I~
~ubstan!.i21J.!11l>.act - thi s development wi 11 over-
Durden the capacity of the fire department to provide
fire protection according to the established response
standards of the appropriate district without the
necessity of est.ablishing a new station or requiring
addition of major equipment (such as hydl'ants, wet
standpipes, etc.) ~o an existing station.
Ii'
Comment~;;:
'" ,-~
~=-- .~-==---=====.:=.==:===----
-
Si""""" _.~~ .
~~=-~-~~l-t.('-_i~~~i&
''''
!{[I[!:i"\!
1 0:
k'I'.t
~ . r "': ~(lrd tatic(i
r,.~ ~
lJ::" i.
FI{C::'~ .
fl,~~;/r .;tijn f"j2.nn'!tl:J OfC-ice'
k~~: /\n(J:Y~>-;.s of lr:l:)(Jct on SC'\"(l~E~ Trcc.lLi::;:-it Capacity
1.1F,TF;
February 5, 1978
"--"--"-' -_. ...._.~---_....~-_..----_..__._..._---_._~._--_.._--~. ._---_...~----_._._--_._----
The !\spen/Fitkir: !)I('JJlninCT Office is rC'vi 2'\',,1 i":'_1 c de'lclopnv~nt ptoposal,
c_:ncl r(~qui n:;s i:qj i5.r\?i.l 'j s of thr~ nroposa 11 s i ct on th~ cZlpaci ty of the
SC',:i'l(!C trc'citr;icnt fete 'iit)' by cU;-ls-iderit:~l exc(::;s c>JP:lcity of the sy~~tern,
'j OCi:: ti 011 of the :learest 'tfWlk li;" COlHH:>ct-j n~_] se'\'!er l'i n2.
The .tJ.--- -.1-, (' at)t)'l'c'a')''-'f' f:o',',n'l l,~!<);..,J-l'.r.:C'- J"I~f' lcr-"{-~on ^l'ZP
r: L_clL:iL i .t r I I" u,' I : I; U'_,I{~ i !.....~ L::_--: ~,o....l ~.)-~
of develor:ilcnt. P'lc~sc l~eview tl1e application &lld indicnte
of impact bel OVi.
and type
the ca teCjO\'j'
Pro'; eel :;;.I2O.SoutlJ..JiaJ.enaJ 925_ Durant.L~J.!bmi Ued by COQl~llil.~.J:!.agman&.J.~W)
!(eferrDl Suh';ii ss i on
t(-:: _ FebruaryJ,~,,~.91J:L__________.
The pr'O:Josed project \',~ill have th'2 follcf,/ing t;/PE: of 'in~i)act on the C(!\l~C";ty
of the sewage treatment system.
/~
!iQ.gJ.igiblp,-J":~.~J ~ substantial excess capacity ex'ists
at the se'\.'Ja~)c: tfb3.nnent plant ar:d at the n(~arest
tl~unk or conncct-ing ::e\'.'er' line to accoliFncddtE~ this
develoV:lent.
/=;
Hoderate 'irm~u('t - only r~:ode(atr.: capacity exists ?it
"C'"th-;'-s"',;"-n';;-'-:"j-"-l-" ;- ,,1- '1[' 01' i1 " "I"g. t'-Ile 11'0"1"''''' t
.,~ ..\.,"u.c ... U l. I' ,('_I. , --'- ~ij ...U,~'_,~,
trunk or"conn:-:cti ns; S':;VJC\" 1'] l1e to dCCOilil;lodaie thi s
deve 1 cp:nent.
t>1
Stlbstant~: ;':1 i~~n\:),_(;t .-, thi s <levelopClcnt \-,.ri 11 over-
bu~:'(ft~'n'-.tf)'(;; ~(-_.. - - 'iT" of the SCi';(')Y' tn~Jii.-I~cnent pli1llt
or ttlC Ilear'~st t"J11!( Ol~ cun:lpcting s~'wer 1il1e.
Coniillen ts: .__c:::.'/l...J\~iJ:::/-_______..s._E.L.iLl-c-~____L$-__.L~_~-~l_I"?.~.c..__l~-------2t:i_E...._____.~ 1'-\ L-e.......1\-
. . A4 '7 -'1.'." /)~.~~ A
. S:.1:fl. ,;;; P7" ___ ,e..LI:::E:....-I'Y.E.!!.&_.Li-~J-::.Li """,,- ...c.,-_-,_..l='./:i.il:;.iL..L~_..L-fL..--'2-~-. " ,...,^=>
.L'-'-...J....JJ.S.,.ALC1:;._..-k.G:.Afl,....--Ztt~'O~,,"'-~~.LL..E.~Ji. rJ_c tJ,g'c_!3:...d...-2e- 11-/ C
c.g..~ fOE !LI.:L..____..____.. -.. -.'O----.---- ------.--.---..-.-.-.-.~._--.--
TJl- ~..L'1~}J..!_~.":_'__ TI=' ,"" ?<1.f::?~A ....Ll:A.iZ.E.r:.__.b.Lr,cE._.E.t:i:~J.....l. '-..r <l r H e
:)i~ll1;itlJr, _~_~._ .A..i.h ../'if"_~j{L' [liilc ___.L t: /3___.1.':6. /17 I?
MI'-'- STilE,;;.' ~/-I~
~/1IC/~ Af'f>C'/jtc4 Tv,'3t: /-lA-,_C. l'.eu0~(J''7.s
tvlll+ A
~"rri-"""C'"':-lG Jvl/6-~e_ IT
/'11 Sfe~ TH,e o'-'?- 1+ rHe:. itt..venA~
rAKc?"- I~Y TI-/e (':>I$-7"""<r 70
.s'Vj3!>/v,slO- SIEI'S ;\Ii!-,; I'>?II'-C-
//-.Jv~Srt?-t+rE. ,rfl< f'RoJ{';,~ert )J.....~
S o i--......'T I ",..-,5.
/0 Co",/!!: vf" i-v,trl
fOtJ~>//".>i-e...
r?j.A~1 CAf>AC.,"t'/ IS
0'-'rFlCLer-1
'--
.") .: t:
f) A. '-tc- F 0 (L
C-vr{r1p;-T.'.
ov C;'; r- buR-A '-I
n[F[Pi~r\\.
---,'~-,~ -'~----.' --....--...---........-.-- ,-_.,._-----_._--,--,.~'_.- -- ---,~.._-----_.--_.~. ._._-_..,_._~. --..-...--.--'-.- ,_._-------' ...-
TO: fL;JC:(! Po') icc' rJ(':p;j('tm,,:'1~
F!,Oi.1: !\SVn/Pitk"i rr 1'1 ,.nn i w; Offi cC'
r<E: !\nJ.-ly';i:; of Irnpact on thl: Aspen \\).: ice D~2.pzn-tr:lcnt
DM [ :
February 5, 1978
. -.---.--.---.---.-------'---.-.----- -.. ._. _._._-,-_..._--_._...-----_...__.-'--~.>-"--"- -.------..-..-
l-hc r\Sp(~,I/P;tkif! F"lanning O-Ffic(~ is reViC\Finq ;:1 d('j~,:,'lcprlent propose!,
2nd rcql,:itc:-; (,:r! 2;n~,i'l)s'j.r, 0-[: Lh i:')'Opo,:\-;'l'~~ ir~;pdct on the cap:icit,y of
the !\~;li{'(: l'ol';ce rt::ncflt l:.:\' cons'idc:'"ilil,l th~~ ab'j'iity of CUY'\,,(:llt
pol-ice:" sccut"ity SCT'.!'1CeS to ~)':O\J';d2 pcotc:(~t';un dCCor'c.l-ing to rea~~QnbQle
resp(in::,~ stDfic!;-.)!~d::. thout U:2 nccess"ity of (;~dd-iti()n~-il faeiliti(0s~
personnel or equ'i fie
The attDc!l:::':d appl iCi:jtion fonl: iduitifies the locat'irJIl ~ sii:!2 and type
of development. Plc(.,si2 revic\',' the appliLCiti.on and 'in(licCl1:e the cute0or'y
of ilnpact beloA.
Project:
500 SO!lth Galena &~~Dur-E-nL(g;bmiJ;J;ed ~9Jlland.L Haqman & Yaw)
Referriil Submission Datre: February l4.,..l~ZfL._.___.___________._.
The prqJOsed project Vii 11 have the fo11o\'.'ing type of impact on ti,e capacity
of the Aspcn Police Department:
CJ t~5"DJ.i9ipl~u.il:li).G:t - suhstuitial eXC2SS cap2cHy en, cs
consideriL9 the ribility of current pol--ice secu.;""'ity
services '[.0 provicie protectioll according to re2soilable
l"c;sponsc sta 1".:,15 \"iithout the n2cc~ssity of addi-
tional fncili'Lics, p~rsonl'iel or equipmcllt.
/~ t~~?~l~rC1_!_~._.1n ct - on-IY mDderat.e c(":rJc\,city e"~cists COil'.
sider.ing thc:~ a lity of curr'cnt l,'D'j-icc :-;Gcurity
services to provide pro~:ection acccll'ding to reJSOflCble
respoiise sL~nd(n'd~~ \:; th;iUt tric' llt::CC:SS i ~S' of acdi.-
ti ollill facili ti ('5, pcrc,orlnel or equ"! pnlcn1:-
~y_b...:~_!~~:i2..t.t~L__11:,'.J~~~t - this dcvelorimcnt \',rill over-
burden tIll: V,L;-; 'l'j t.v of current po l'j ce securi ty servi c[-~s
to provide protection aceol"ding to reasonahle y'eSI)OllSC
stalldards \vithc)ut tIle necessity of additioi)al
fac:i 1 i ti cs ~ rh~i"'5onne 1 or' equi p:11cnt.
Q.Q (; ~ HI>> li~N' l
COlnllCIl ts: "&i ecL&a'l___~ .. )'QJL~ ~v..~f.:'_ ~'=,~0~~Lii-l f1oL(l
~{L.l!L{'f _..~}L _JJ,B,___ 0?!::'.Q ,<deL.JL'i-._l11L. ~ / /L,/1-(J.f.-~-~:f13::~'4-~--
I . I .' tt~ '
, 1_.J:t()fh.wull.-.~4_./lPl~.~..AI.L..JlLiR.Iji.c,.<n( . t11:'JCl.,~J6-_._ <1i'5-..k.
14/YlJJ,)L~<e... ~JlIINleR'TL'l JlL _G?HUd"?f1-.--h. _f11'i_ __E C(;,/f~!:ttL___tJ;>{I~(,c4
~~~:~l::,:~ :1J-~-~U1 !..~f::~: ' ;;')1-
~ ___.IfL(~ ...... . ......1-
C!
- 1 .
.
P,E~'r:EHr"L
,
TO: r(;:I(;1 City Ln~.;i'ie{;r'
rhU:-1:
r,~ 'Il/P;t~:il': rlliln~:ing Offic;e
[\[: f\ti0 "is 01 Impilct Oil SI/)]'llI IJrainuT', i'i:r'kili~1 DcsiUn, and I:oarl,
DI\T[ :
February 5, 1978
. ---.---,..-.".-.-- _.~-- -~_._-_.._.._-_._..._-", -.-- .--_.~-. .- ---,_..---_.---.-.~.._.--_...>_._~-~----- -.--..' -,--<-,--"-"--'-~-
The /\spe;-;/f)'it!~.;:: p'jt:;:i'I'~n(j Off-jc:.; i'-~ l'c'rlc:'./ing i1 d;~vC'lo:-,;ncnt pre;-'Ds;il,
-I"rl l~r'~lL'-:'; ~-(. "I) ":'I,~,")'.lc-'c"-'{If 1_\ (.\ Il"-.,,:,n,,,;:,'] \(; "II:")~-!r'" P'I ""fir' C-)'-"~C'-~ ()e,'
C.<I-.J . '."j! I. '....' 0.. U .'--, ',j _' I.J ~ L-I.,_ - ~"r"I.~.'u,,- ,Ii-. ~"l, j, ... (~':/"" j .
storill c;Y':-;li-:~'qC~ 'iij~j i~jn~ c),-t:J rCiHL, cunsi(~c:i''' Ul(~ caprjCity
of th;~ ~,'ii'lage ,r,. !'l';'~";(\::, to u3tc'ly C;i:;PD7.C of trlt~ sutf(;c~ runoff;
COilS1 . 'jliG th::: j(i;::)'; l'it,;/" C'T d0siijii ur of'r-"-strc:ct park-inD or-ens;,
c<1d cuns"ic!~Tin0 the c;:~;Jc:.c-it,s cf i',-\;jor st:"c:et 1 inkClJc:.
~1-hE; c1ti,ciChc-:d dppl'ic;}i.':-;cn form .i'~ont'ific::s the locaL'io;-\~ s.iz(~ und type of
dcv(;l _.nt. Ple(<::[\ rC"I'j(-,;'! -Chi'.: r.lpp1icat'jon and ind-;cat(;; the eCi ory
of -imDcct be:lu.-'/.
prOj2~rt; 50Q2.oJ11h_2.a,l ena..~__~~Jlbmi tted bY.C9..pJ~...Jiagman..MJLYaw)
R.efen'i 1 S ss i en Diite: ...!'.~~ruarYJ~"..J~7!L_____.___._____.__n__.__
lbr::.
,I,..
O~ .
, .
cd project \',111-1 have Up:,':' fOil
ng type of irilp3,c'L on L:hc ccp~cit.\/
STOHl'l: DRP\Ii'
;t!
NC:~11i9';hlc iL'!7;d,Ct - subst2nti(i'1 (::>.CCSS C2D=~.'>it.Y.' ex'1:::,tr)
T(J1"~-'ai:-(j,~:iil-~"~l-~;~---ri:'Erl'itic:s to oCkqU(it:~'!,\1 d-1 ~i(\:~~; l'y ti,:".~
surf2c:e ,(,ull(d~r of ichc \il"Op:,sE:d ~jcvc--,'jU~-i;;iL::it \, ,';~!1(1:,!t
. ' ' l "tl ~ !!' '1'
sY~>j.:m CXTE:nSlon~) -)ej.'())"j(J - nose nC1l'rriCli l}' 'l:-l~-c.(~.. 1
the deve 1 op(:.'r'.
by
r/
f/18C1(T2Itr-' in;[';"! -. 0nly nnder(~i~t-" CL~ ci t,Y l2xi sts for
111'''~~i"i1i-~j"e'7t1.c L:-; 2S t~) i-;l~equi<te'iy d'] spo:.;e of t.hl2
. , i "'I t' " "
Sl!Y'!, ace l"Ui'; D-l tlC: V'ODO::,C:(.l CF:ve CO;1Jl?n - \'.11 {1't~IU '.:
system extcl,~~ior1s iJ(:~.'>'()nd thuSE: norm:-:lly insta'I';e;j by
the d(~vc'l orcr b
/]
Sll.!~:_St(I~1J..tLt3J.-_~.1~)~..1.0-~t, .- th i s d(~v e 1 oP:!It';'nt vI'i 11 ovcr-
Durden the clipacity of the draina~j2 facilities ';:,0
ilucqui1tely eli -'pose of 1 he Slll'fc1ce ITnJff of the
p!'opClsed dc;vE' 1 up:I1:~nt vri thout. sys tom extcns i OilS
br'yond those IID,'nullyin,tilllcd by the develope'\',
Comments: ._~"__.~.~._v_!!!!~--#-..-
ff1-- r-Il. ~ ' ..
----JJ.-L--.~--._"._.._.~.-----~-- - --, - -~-..-..-'-' - ...-.- ,~-...".---..~---~-----."...-..-.-.--
------_.~._-----_._._-~ ---".----, ... ---.-- .'----._----,.. ---- --------.-.,-,------.-.-' ,-_._--.~._.__.- "._.~._--
_______ _,_. .__ ~_o.__._.,._~.__,_._" -.--~- -,,- ..--------.-. ----.-..--. ,~----.,-
-.. -.,,-----.-..-.....-'- _._~,-----
tt.__ _._ _.___~....__.__ - -"'--" ..... '''...------. --...- -"..---~-,,-.-.,-..-,-- -.-.--.---.-. -.-.
- -I
~~
f~'
.'
........,.......
['I\I.'f;:.r: I,"
".- - ~ -
(/
nC:S1.Li!rLh'l.(:j.~\I' (I.~. :,:,:) ~,L;'it-iill cxcr,'~~; (oPdC it)' px-j'_;t:_;
'-(or' 1h(~ (i;:_,"ii}!'1 fJ-i rlr' iy'nct, fHY'i~irn ilrCd'; v!ith r~-(i-'-'
to v'i~.,u;,l;jI .-;(::"., (,:~:. n-;:- fl;iVLJ ~;u('fu.cc ~ cUllvcn'iclii_J:
c!fld ~-;i_dc i y civ"
l;J
l~or]CI'(,t(' 11', ~1 - (,or 1'. !jOJ')I~{L(' ((1flJ(,it~' l/lS1S for
th(\ dC:.:'jf::i off-~~p(::,,-:~ pi -ing ,:rrCi)~, \,!-itf"l YC~;p~":ct
to v-i~,u(;'i -;'I':r_i.:-.ct, (d:,i ',i., of IJ(JVc.ci surftlCC, CDIT-.:c:n-jel1':..:C
dlld ~-,(J';f: t.y (:/-i ts.
I]
SIJhstan1:-iiil i ct - this dcvel ~:ill Qver-
blJ-i::(]r.'I\ I;~: LC;)(ICr{.~/ -((l~' tl:e dc(;i (In of ofi-"-<:;-~.rcet
P;l\ k-inq c':(, ,-...~; ~.iit~1 rec;r:c:ci.. to visuill 'illq-)tlCt., {:!ili.lUnt
of l)(.:\.jccl ~_~L;r'fc~(e, conv;~ri'icncc ;:,(1(\ Sc.rC'L':/ (~:.::.-ic:;.
::::.?~~~........._~~
ROf~D3
CJ
Neqi i(;i~)lc 'ii'i>1Ct - suL):~.t2ljtic'1 c;<cess cc<_p2c'ity e>:i,:t~';
--_.._---~.,......,~--,_...- ,-~-- ~---- - ---~
io provide for the n s of the r1-oposed d~v~lup~211t
viithout ~,ub:.;-l~i:nti()-~'ly ~_ltc\,'-iiig ex.;:)ti;19 tr'i~ffic
p2.t.tertIS or o\/c('lo;:,d-it:J tht:; existin~_! stv'~' '~: :-;ystem
or tile nE~C(:,sr)-ji_~y of p\'C\/-id-in~~ inCf'f;';SCO 'l_kd i1rj'iE'aq~~
'/'''--' ~. '.-~-..." ~,r.r~
ant! UJ Ilkll!L_\.J(J".....l.
p
ct - modci~~:.te cap~city exists for the
,-,. "1 ,,, , ' " t' 'I'
!J1"OpO.S:Cu C~!V~:-: OP':1::::iil: vnr.rl(;ur St~L1S'Ldn 'li~ IY
altcr-;nq cj;-istin'J trcl';--fic pi.i.~-tC\ti~-; Ot~ o\lc(-lo(~d;tI~l
th(~ exist'jrl~: S-l.f',-:et ~,ystf:r:! or' the nccc,ss'ity of
r:r-ov'idin~1 -!il('ri__'c:'~ed j'"ej3d m~l~: 2.)1d/ot-' L1~;':ili,:c'naf)Ce.
i/iCJdrfi:rc;
i)e(~'cfs ---(l"f
CJ
SU1",:',tDnt-; '1 i
t "" t,his ch"lvE'1
n t \'f'j '11 C.'I L1Y'-
bunk:n the c,'fJ?C fv of the c:-:i ~;i:'j n~J tTi~ 1'\ C' p~;ttern') ~
or the ()vcl>lo'::Ld'in~) of tile e>("i~,t.in0 stXt'c:t \'r'::;tC;;i,
or the n2cc~;::ity of pr-o'./-idinS ilic.Te{;,~;ed r\I,:_,.d In-iled~lC'
and/or 111aintt'-:iiancc:.
Commcnts :~----~~-.~k~<' ~......&.. .0-:!~.cf.....i)
&f-;-_~";:~:';2 ,~1:dk--.~~~
._~..._.b_....____ .~_~~u _____.~
~---~---:-~_.~.MI~-..~-&f_-.
'~~'-'-'--"'-'-
$i '1"'" "'c_.._---.!.u:-n-~.- ..
[)" i l' J.- !r 3/7 ,P
- .~--". -'''.,-- -"-"-f.-~'- ".-...-.,,-,.. '. -,.~---_..- ....._,
- ? '
~-.......,
'\"..
i
,
rzFr [i{\Z/\L
_.~~._----' ,,--~-----~-,._--"--"--"'-"
TO:
Ci ty 0"1' Ii:)
~<!utcY'
, ('~~;:(; Ii t
FRO:1:
l\spcri/!'itkirl Plcnn-ii"l(i nf-;:'lc(:
R[:
Analysis of Impo.ct on the: e>.ist.]
\<bt:~~'( sY'Jtem and cdpacit.y
D!\T[:
February 5, 1978
-----~~,--~"'-,.,"..~,_._-----'-_..~--~----"--,... "
---,---'""-,-"'----"-----~._-"----_._.._.._------'- -..
Th(: /\sD0n/PiU',':n P"lannill'-l Off-ice "is 1"2\'-:(:\.' il:rj ,~;
a,ncl rCClu'irr:s ;:11) .::1Jl(llssis' of the pr()n(jsd'l'~:, --;
of ovai'lab"!r; v::-;tcY' ctnd i ct on \':at',?( !Ht:_'--:;;U('L:
[nairl or cOllilectirlg line.
d2\'cl(ji)~~2nt i~r'oposrtl
t on tii2 C'V(:Y'ij"! 'j C,:
OfiJ th0 r~~2rcs1: v:~tel~
The Dttached a!_)p-licotion.fo~'Yl id(;nti1~-ic~:. tl-,? locc:.t-;,(!i-j, s'i~_~ and type of
devc:lopn;::nt. P"lci:se rOVle,.) the C;Ppl-](:(-itlOi-! 2.,1:d ltjOiCal.,e tr;C Ci\tC(jD\"Y
of inl[J3ct below.
IJroj [iCt: 2Q.(L~ou1:h Ga 1 ena_.&..Jlz.!,i_j).l!ran.t.lli.bolU.te(Lby..c.upJ~<L. J:ia~marLLYaw)
Hefetrc~ 1 Subm-i 5S.; on Date: ___E~J'-rlljlx.Y_1iI__19}"a._______~_.-___~_ .---"---.------~--~
The Py'oposed pr-oject vii 11 h:l ve the fo! 1 Q\li 119 type of i mpil ct on th(:;
cap0.ci ty of the sev,lage trC'i./ciilcric syste':i:
'f!1
.~ ::uhs.t:anticl.'] (~XCGSS \'l0,tC;j' cap'::icity
nci, 01~~1}' a rct wate~' pressure
of the nf: ares t V:;:,_ ter rno. in m" c:onncc ti
~, ""I'
~,-~\LI_.i~l
exists
in th2 vicinity
water 1 i ,1[',
o
i't - on']v 1.il~1ited,vrater C2,iJ2citv (-',<-ist~; ~~
, UI"(:. ".,.,'1' 110 '1L::-Q,.--!-,,,"] -'\1 :'-ho '-~-'-CJt ..56.-.. ccA
, ,._.) ._ \, I I ", C (., . '.'_'V__U I ,"".....1IIj;
1);;';;;"" O(fe:~l(il1(!p~.~%
SlIhstClir.J",-, il1il,'Ct ' th'i, of've,l Iii 11 (1' ('\',Irc':'r!
't'h~;-\<,:;--i":- "~'.:",',.,""cl-~('.:'";",;",r:,-'~.,T,, 1"1' ?Il"i ,"1"{~ s("'~nl!r-l\.' l'l~'!!:Je.~, thr'
C .. ,-', <, '_ ., " _' ,..:1 L.- ',II'" ,1' __ c,,~) '"' .~,' .- '- ' ....
pi~C~;SU~':: "j )-: -l:h:,: nC(~i'C:::; t J1;:d n (Ii"' CC'~l!d~C l>~: V.-';,"Lc:r 1 i lie.
" ,
FIOde1"0te
CO:T:i:ients:
H", q .... Tit~:~=7'r;-=2;;;';'=-;l. ~ ~
----'--- ----- ;- ~ ~~
- "'---. ~. -- - -,- -- ----- -;;/iIL;;-- - ---
_____~-----~-'Z1.J9' hO ..' '"----
\
,
--,''', ---,.,-,-.--', --- , rY
_,.,e_71J~pr
!L.t(~
-
R"-":"~
1 -. - ~~,
\ ' :1-
. , '._ "j~'t
.." .-;.:;;:'~
I
I
I
I
-.... -
---
Copland Hagr 31~-:',l LId Archl\ocl. i'() il,,,, ;'136 M~'en COI01)
;1611 303 ':)25 2867
March 14, 1978
Aspen Planning and Zoning commission
Ci ty Hall
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: GMP POINT EVALUATION
RESIDENTIAL SECTION
Dear Sirs:
To reserve our option for further discussion with
Aspen City Council regarding exceptions we take
with methodologies, evaluations and GMP point awards
by the Planning Office on GMP residential appli-
cations, we wish to place this letter on the record
of P and Z proceedings March 14, 1978.
The following is a brief itemized discussion of
points we wish to be considered by City council:
1,500 South Galena/925 Durant Project
This project is a single suvmission comprised of
development on two separate land parcels. Evaluation
guidelines do not contemplate review method for this
type of project.
Planning office evaluated this project by considering
a single GMP catagory for both portions of the project
simul taneously, thus the total project point award ~;as
reduced to the lowest point level given to the individual
project portion. This nwthod tends to mask the merits on
one part and not give a true evaluation of its worth or
deficiency.
A more equitable method of evaluation would be to
evaluate each of the two development portions of the
submission separately and on its own merits in accord-
ance \vi th G~lP guidelines. The total point award \vould
then be added together and divided by 2 to reach the
total project point award. This would allow fair and
unbias point awards as contemplated by GMP guidelines,
yet would permit the deficiencies or merits of each
portion to average out the other.
Copland Hagmane> LId Architects
o
Letter to Aspen Planning & Zoning Comm.
March 13, 1978
Page 2
2.Water
Points not awarded consistant with criteria. 925 Durant
Project and Goodnough project location separated by only
2 city lots yet were awarded different points.
3.Fire Protection
I.
I
I
I
Points not awarded consistant with criteria. 925 Durant
Project and Goodnough project location separated by only
2 city lots, yet were awarded different points.
4. PUblic Transportation
Points not awarded consistant with criteria. Only projects
that "improve level of Public Transportation Service" should
be awarded 2 points: projects that may be handled by existing
level of service awarded only 1 point.
5.Recycle Facilities
Points not awarded consistant with stated criteria. Goodnough
project awarded 2 points for providing recycling material
bins; other projects provided identical facilities awarded
only 1 point. Park Central project awarded 1 point and did
not provide on-site recycle facilities.
6. Handicap Provisions
Points not awarded consistant with stated criteria. Different
point awards. to projects that provide identical elements for
handicap. No point award recognition of projects that make
special (non-required) provision for the handicapped.
7. proximity to Commercial Facilities
Points not awarded consistant with criteria. None of the
submitted projects "in and of itself improves the level
of (commercial proximity) service in a given area",
therefore should all be awarded only 1 point.
Respectively submitted,
La~~'
COPLAND HAGMAN YAW LTD
JLY/lls
-.
0 0
I
C I
I
I
I
I
500 S. GALENA
925 DURANT
COMI3INED PROJECT'
c
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
PLAN SUBMISSION
o
o
o
Growth Management
Plan Submission
I
I
I
I
I
c
500 S. Galena
925 Durant
Combined Project
GENERAL REVIEW INTRODUCTION
Submitted for GMP review as one project this submission con-
sists of development planning on two separate land parcels:
The 500 S. Galena portion of the project on which (16) free-market
units and (1) employee unit are planned; the 925 Durant portion
of the project on which (12) low income studio units a rc planned.
The respective locations of the two project entities are shown on
the Project location map, following page.
10
I
I
The review criteria denoted in the Growth Management Allotment
Application is basically, and most easily, structured for evaluation
of a project proposed for development on a single land parcel. To
facilitate review and evaluation of this project, which combines
development on two land parcels, we have submitted each develop-
ment component in a separate section of this portfolio. Each of
the two parcels proposed for development have been treated in-
dividually as to their respective compliance with GMP criteria.
The 500 S. Galena portion is discussed in the first portion of the
submission and the 925 Durant portion in the latter portion.
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
I
I
I
I
I
o
o
o
500 S. Galena
925 Durant
Combined Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
I
I
I
APPROVAL REQUEST
The 1975 Aspen Employee Survey clearly demonstrated that 52%
of the employees surveyed had household incomes less than $10,000
per year. This group is mainly comprised of the support employee,
a significantly large and important group to Aspen's economic
structure. These employees have been disenfranchised by the un-
availability of adequate housing at a price they can afford.
c
An important aspect of this project is the focus on housing needs for
the low income employee. Of the 29 total units proposed 45%
(13 units) are designed and designated to meet lower income needs.
The merit of the low income housing provided by this project cannot
be measured, only, as a percentage of total units. Their more
important value in meeting the low income need must consider that
quality and size of space (form) is being provided at rental rates
even lower than contemplated by the Growth Management guidelines.
I
Applying the standard used by the Planning Office, i. e. 30% of gross
income spent on housing, this project creates housing for 26 em-
ployees (double occupancy per housing unit) with a salary of $4000
per year. The designated unit rent of $175 - $200 per month is
significantly lower than can be justified by normal development
economics.
I
I
The unit distribution proposed for this project purposely creates
employee housing remote from the free market units. The four lot
site, in the RMF zone, allows the development of larger studio units
(425 s. f.) with more open space amenity, thus a higher quality em-
ployee product. Rather than being located supportive of a specific
employer, the low-income units may, at this location, address the
employee groups at large.
I
I
o
This project offers major and immediate relief for the employee
housing deficit at a location within walking distance of all employ-
ment, shopping, and recreational destinations. If approved by
GMP review, construction of the low income housing will begin
immediately and prior to construction of any free market units,
which will be phased voluntarily.
I
I
I
,
o
o
c
500 S. Galena
925 Durant
Combined Project
I
I
I
Growth Management
Plan Submission
In view of the urgent need for low income housing such as this
project will immediately provide, we urge that City Council
authorize, for this project, the construction of additional em-
ployee units as permitted by Section 24-10.10 of Ordinance 48.
(Series of 1977).
c
I
o
I
-
-
c
~ ~Q7
~::: O~==
~ ~..' -==--=
I
I
..... 925 Durant
Project
,I
r
Ie
>
I
-
Jt
0---
I
I
~
~
I
600
~ I
o 200 400
,
I
III .
<
;;II
500 S. ~^LE",!NA';' ,
~ '-"j~"
PROJECT
GIONth Management
Plan Submission
o
o
,....
..
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Submitted to:
City of Aspen Planning Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
Applicant:
Mr. Hans Cantrup
P. O. Box 388
Aspen, Colorado
c
I
,
Architect:
Copland I1agman Yaw Ltd
210 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
I
I
I
I
c
I
I
o
o
I
OJ
3
go
i
-
.~
cQ'
~
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
INTRa DUCTO R Y
1. Project Name:
2. Location:
3. Pa rcel Size:
4. Current Zoning District:
5. Zoning which Application
is filed under:
6. Maximum Buildout under
Current Zoning:
7. Total Number of Units
Proposed and Bedroom Mix:
8. Size of Units:
9. Price Range for Sale or
Rent:
"
500 S. Galena Project
500 South Galena Street
City of Aspen
21,600 Sq. Ft.
L-2 Zone, City of Aspen
(RMF permitted use)
L-2 Zone using RMF
Option
21 studio units
or
16 one-bedroom units and
1 studio unit
17 units total, comprised of
(16) one-bedroom free market
units and (1) studio employee
unit
(a) one-bedroom free market
units @ 1000.1200 s. f. each
(b) studio employee unit @
600 s. f.
(a) one-bedroom condominium
units sold at current market
price
(b) studio employee unit (manager)
rented at $175 per month
c
I
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
10. Program Narrative:
The site is planned to maximize open space, landscaped at the
public corner of the parcel and to permit the functional organi-
zation of two basic building groups comprised of (16) free market
units, in a massing configuration compatible with neighborhood
scale and pedestrian movement.
Consistant with open space objectives the majority of required
parking is designed for a subgrade location. This additionally
permits weather free movement from vehicle to individual unit.
Buildings are designed in a two level stacked configuration with
individual unit plans canted at 300 to permit solar and view
orientation up the mountain and to further reduce the massing
by the staggered building form.
The architecture of the buildings is characterized by sloped
roofs stepped in relation to grade change, the use of native
stone, cedar siding, exposed wood beam exterior elements and
projecting balcony elements.
The site will be completely landscaped to create privacy and to
create a corner green space relating to pedestrian movement.
The floor area ratio permitted by zoning for this project is FAR
1:1 or, 21,600 s. f. of building development. As designed, the
total project uses approximately 18,500 s. f., or 85% of the allowed
FAR.
11. Description of Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses
As shown on the Vicinity Map, the project is located at 500 South
Galena Street in the L-2 zone. Surrounding zoning is L-2.
Surrounding land uses are a mix of lodges, commercial facilities,
multi -family and Single-family units. Immediately surrounding
complexes are the Tippler Inn & Lodge, Continental Inn, Alpenblick
Inn, and Durant Condominiums.
~-
-~-~---
RIlE 5f.'Jl0l.j
HI&fIWoIY BL!r-w~ 5f.---i
EXI5Tl~ t'W.L s
\ll6HEJ1: I'm<
~f!IQ<.5OO1lloI
w.> I'!UfE
roruIT1II. ~ LmP
LIFT I.A
Lf11L~ ~~LL LIFT
~ CllY 1l<.IIL
I"<OJELT SITE.
&A1.EfJA SIlIEEr
MILL sn<fEr
a CGl'IMtnU\L em:
~ CCMMEJll:LAL LOC6t
[, '] LOrGE l
. ....
rnrrn 1\E5I~}.[l1,AL .17' LOroE
III I%KjFUellG
Vicinity Map
~
o 200 4K)() 800
~
AGMAN YAW LTO ARCHITECTS
A STREET PROJECT COPLANO H
THE SOD SOUTH GALEN A"f" 'Ca'o "I"
Jre~
-1 l
) -~
~
::::~~ J~...
l~ lrt-...
~"" .....
(I."n,n. I...,I"........,..'''...H..........~''III ~"""
~ ~- 2jt-..,. '''~'''f
UIl1l~ I~~ 4~
ALre~ IlLICK
IVTCIJlW. ~ Lalf'
Site Context
r-\...o-"
o 200 400
,
...
U11LE f,Eu.
fl:LL LIfT
lllTLf. INIl
llm.E I..l:(l';E
sreer- 5l.lnS
t:trNIl"WCOS
~
THE SOD SOUTH GALENA STREET PROJECT COPL.AND HAGMAN YAW LTC ARCHITECTS
A ,,, en'" "
-,......
NORTH Of NELL
,
<?jD:~
~....J :~, ,/-~' . ~-,~-,
"
DEAN AVENUE
CONTINENTAL INN
,-'
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
'--
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
L~___,
~~__I
,
,
I-
W
W
a:
I-
lJ)
'"
Z
W
-'
'"
"
US
SITE PLAN
~
01020 40 80
,
,
E1
,
,
,
~
I
I
,_-
\
./
./
./
/'/'
/'
/
/
/
/' /
/ "I
/
/
/
--
-,
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----1
~___I
I
I
l
I-
UJ
UJ
a::
I-
00
<t
Z
UJ
...J
<t
"
cJi
Unit Plan
500 $. GALENA S~ PROJECT
~
r1...-l
o 10 20
I
80
40
I
I
Underground Parking Plan
500 S.GALENA S~ PROJECT
~
'''" ""
Surface
Parking
for 7
Cars
I-
W
W
"
t;
ct
Z
W
-I
ct
CJ
~
-i
~
~
!--
r1.-l
o 10 20
40
(
"--
/-\
recycling.
center.
V /'
I "-,,-
I "-
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
I
~ Underground
,
I Parking
I
I
(. 10 Cars
,
I
I
I
,
....,
elevator
I
I
----t
I
80
~
3Nn A1l:l;!~~_
',\',
'J;
-->:~~
"
jot--
,
.:~~
...
W
w
a:
Iii
c(
Z
W
oJ
c(
Cl
:z:
...
::l
o
UI
::E
o
a:
...
z
o
j:
o
w
UI
....
Z
o
~
:>
w
oJ
W
iNn Ail:l3clOYd
\ F:
"---""
"', ~
ARCH ITECTURAL
~
o 5 ~ ~ ~
l-"'"
~
.
~
90
o
","oU
o
o
o
T
F
Typical Unit Plan
500 S. GALENA
Size 1000 -1200 s.t.
Sale Market Price
~
n....J
024
I
8
I
16
o
o
"2
'2:
l'5'
~
<
~. I
,-,
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
PUBLIC SERVICES
(aa) Water System
The evaluation is the capacity of the public water system to pro-
vide for the needs of the proposed development without treatment
plant or other facility upgrading beyond those provided by the
developer.
The project water demand is directly related to the fixture unit
count, consisting of 300 F. U., which converts to 80 GF'l\1 maxi-
mum probable current ASHRE guide standards. The 6" C.l. P.
water main located in Galena Street, adjacent to the project site,
will provide good flow and pressure to the project development.
A project review by Mr. James Markalunus indicates that no fore-
seeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing water service
at adequate pressure levels and no substantive impact on the treat-
ment plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75%
capacity, will result from the project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Prcject review letter from Mr. James J. Markalunus,
Aspen Water Department, this section
(bb) Sewer System
The evaluation is the capacity of the public sewage disposal system
to serve the proposed development without system extensions and
without treatment plan upgrading.
The project site is served by an existing 8" sewer line in serviceable
condition extending up S. Galena Street and located directly adjacent
to the project site.
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of
100/gal. /day /person to project occupancy standards of 1. 5 per-
sons per one-bedroom unit and 1. 25 persons per studio unit, the
total project would generate only 2600 gallons per day. This
would add less than 1/7 of one percent to the plant capacity, thus
is well within the service capability of the present capacity.
A preliminary project review by Mr. Heiko Kuhn indicates that
no foreseeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing sewage
service to this project and no substantive impact on the treatment
plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75% capacity,
will result from this project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Project review letter from Mr. Heiko Kuhn, District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District, this section
(cc) Storm Drainage
The evaluation is the capacity of drainage facilities to adequately
dispose of surface runoff without public drainage system expansion.
The drainage control system for this project will collect and retain
all site runoff and interrupted subsurface flow with on -site drainage
facilities. The project shall have a serie,s of dry wells and retention
wells sufficiently sized to retain and disperse site surface and roof
water runoff. Consistant with standard engineering practice, the
drywells will have overflow outlets extending to S. Galena Street.
A planted diversion berm will be created at the uphill side of the
project to divert excessive surface drainage away from building
development that would result from abnormal precipitation.
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program section
,
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(dd) Fire Protection
The evaluation is the ability of the Fire Department to provide
fire response to the project according to the established response
standards.
The project site is located approximately 1300 L. F. (4 city blocks)
from the fire station and can expect a maximum response time of
minutes from alert siren to equipment arrival at site fire location.
The project development will provide an on-site fire hydrant which,
in addition to serving this project, will upgrade the protection
system for the immediate neighborhood.
The building development will be additionally protected by a dry
standpipe system, completely sprinkle red parking garage and
ionic smoke detection in individual units.
A project review by Mr. Willard Clapper indicated no foreseeable
deficiencies exist with regard to fire protection.
Reference:
A. Project Vicinity Map, this section
B. Site Plan, Physical Design and Program section
C. Project review letter by Mr. Willard C. Clapper,
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
(ee) Parking Design
The evaluation is the design of required parking with respect to
visual impact, exposed paving, convenience and safety.
The majority of the required on-site parking (1 space per unit =
17 spaces) has been located in an underground parking structure
below the residential units. The parking structure will provide
for 10 of the required spaces and the remaining 7 spaces will be
provided as surface parking screened by landscaped earth berms.
All parking has immediate and level pedestrian access to the pro-
ject elevator as well as access stairs.
"'....,
<
..
500 S. Galena Proj ect
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
B. Parking Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
(ff) Roads
The evaluation is the capacity of existing roads to service
project generated traffic without substantially overloading or
altering existing traffic patterns.
As shown on the Site Context Drawing, this section, the pro-
ject is located on Galena Street approximately one block south
of Durant A venue.
Examination of the traffic impact of the project is primarily
based on work generated by the UMTA transportation study and
on recent conversations with Mr. Steve Lockwood, Alan M.
Voorhees & Assoc., Inc., traffic consultant for the UMTA study.
The table below presents the trip type and trip frequencies per
day per unit for a project unit as estimated by Mr. Lockwood.
The 6.5 trips per unit is less than the 10.0 trips per unit for a
typical residential unit, because the project consists of one-
bedroom units generating less people than larger apartment or
condominium units. Total trips are estimated between automobile
and non-automobile trips.
Estimated
Trip Type Estimated Non-Automobile Estimated Non-
One-Way Trips Trip Percentage Automobile Trips
Skiing/
Recreation* .75 60% .5
Work 2.00 75% 1.5
Shopping and 1. 25 75% .9
Entertainment
Personal Business 1. 00 50% .5
Other 1. 50 ~ . 4
6.50 60% average 3.8
"". ,/
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
*The 60% non-automobile average for recreation trips assumes
approximatey 75%-80% of ski trips are non-automobile but only
50-55% of summer recreation trips are non-automobile.
Due to the project's immediately convenient location to downtown
Aspen, Little Nell Lift and Rubey Park ski buses, it is estimated
a high percentage (60% to 75%) of skiing, work, shopping and
entertainment trips will be non-automobile trips.
As shown, potentially 60% of the total projected trips per unit
will be non-automobile trips. The estimated 2.8 automobile
one-way trips per day are equivalent to a resident's using his
car on an average of approximately one time per day. The
walking and public transportation convenience of the project's
location plus the project's low resident population results in
minimal traffic impact created by the project.
Current detail traffic counts are not available for the area to
quantitatively estimate traffic impact.
Reference:
A. Site Context Map, this section
(gg) Energy
The evaluation is ability of the project, its spaces and users, to
maximize the conservation of energy.
Consistant with the solar geography of the site, all project con-
struction will be designed and built to maximize solar utilization
and to minimize heat loss, thus reducing the demand placed on
the fossil fuel resource for space heating. The following techniques
will be implemented in this project.
Insulation
Significantly exceeding regulatory thermal standards, exterior
walls will be insulated to R=26 to 28 min. ; roof composites to
R=42; floor composite to R=20, foundation perimeters to R=14.
".'"
'-'
"'",
" ./-
-'
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Architectural
Architectural design configures buildings to optimize thermal
characteristics of the project. Exterior wall ex!X>sure is mini-
mized by staggered unit concept (common wall), and by vertical
space organization (minimum ratio of exterior surfaces per sq. ft.
of occupied space). All buildings are oriented with highest use
interior spaces to the south to achieve view while maximizing
passive solar heating !X>tential.
Glazed openings on non-south exposures will be limited to
Uniform Building Code minimums (to comply with ventilation re-
quirements). Opening surround details will be required to mini-
mize heat loss due to infiltration.
Partial flat roof surfaces are designed for all units to retain the
additional insulation value of snowfall layers.
Devices
Consistant with solar geography of site, solar collectors will be
utilized for domestic hot water heating. Electric energy will be
designated for primary space heating to reduce fossil fuel demand.
(approximately 50% of electric !X>wer used in Aspen area is hydro-
generated). Automatic thermostats will be specified to control
night time space temperatures. Fire place design will use double
damper control, exterior comoostion air, glazed fire opening,
and heat return ducting. Humidification will be used to reduce
temperature required to achieve equal comfort levels.
Reference:
A. Architectural Drawings; Physical Design and Program Section
UFT I.A
-)
H16H\.AY eZ/M'J~ ST.----i
EXI5T1~& t"ALLS
W6NE!': mx
P:IW I'N<K 5ImlIl
[;UIl;AI(f AVEflUE
w.; I'l?Jre
um.. ~LL LIFT
I!1TWl1Il. ~ LmI'
rww.w CllY T1<AIL
m:>JECT SITE
eALEIJA sno:eET
MILL '5TlIeET
. W1MtI\C.LIIL un
~ CQ1ME~ ~
l""""1 Lor&E: l
~
[ill]] ~vef.lTW..1 7- LOI)Sf.
mil 1m.!f'UeI..IG
Vicinity Map
~
o 200 400 800
~
CO~LAND HAGMAN YAW LTC A~CHITECTS
THE SOD SOUTH GALENA STREET PROJECT A 'p' n Col" ,,10
IUeYmK 51ATlQ\.l~
romrr A'lElUO+ E
(
~
J
JrE-7
.-l 1
1 -~
~
LITTLe IoI:LL
~cc LIfT
CClITl~eIlW. I~~
TImE. IIlIl
T11!'lf.~
ALre~ fL\C.K
STllP' 5Wl"ES
~=
rvru-JTW. ~ l.COf'
~~:~I~
~/
Site Context
~
o 200 400 800
THE 500 SOUTH GALENA STREET PROJECT COPLANO HAGMAN YAW LTO ARCHITECTS
A..p,n C:olo""oo
-
"".,.",~
~-_.
...., ,i/
January 25, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P.O. Box 2736
Aspen, colorado 81611
RE: 500 South Galena project
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the development proposal for the above
referenced project, which I understand to consist of 16
one-bedroom condominium units and 1 studio employee unit.
The project site is presently served by a 6" C.I.P. water
main, which is located adjacent to the site, and it continues
up South Galena Street where it loops with a 6" water main
aligned in Mill Street.
The two nearest hydrants are located on Durant Street and
are No. 102 and No. 103. They have tested static pressures
of 92 psi and 94 psi respectively. I estimate the new hydrant
to be provided by developer (per city of Aspen specifications)
and adjacent to the project site to yield approximately 85 psi
static pressure and a flow of approximately 2000 g.p.m.
It is my opinion that the development proposed for this site
poses no foreseeable deficiencies related to water service.
l"Y ,"u , ii~
(]:::
~
" j
,I
January 25, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P.O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: PROPOSED 500 GALENA PROJECT
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the development proposal for the subject
project with regard to fire protection.
I understand the project to consist of (16) one-bedroom
condominium units and (1) studio employee unit.
The two nearest fire hydrants, No. 102 and No. 103, are
located approximately one city block distant on Durant
Avenue and have tested static pressures of 92 psi and
94 psi, respectively. A new hydrant will be located
adjacent to the project site, which is estimated to
yield approximately 85 psi static pressure and a flow
of 2000 G.P.M. The location of hydrants relative to
this project permits good coverage at adequate pressure
levels and augments the ability of the Fire Department
to serve the neighboring structures.
The site plan indicates that fire vehicles and equipment
will have good access to the project from two streets in
addition to the roadway access provided for a portion of
the on-site parking.
The location of the project relative to the fire station
permits the prompt response time necessary to deal with
fire related problems.
It is my opinion that the development proposed for this
site poses no foreseeable deficiencies related to fire
protection.
Very truly yours,
-) ,
'(< ,(/ / ( ,j;;'
f. // (,' 1 'f. [" / f
Willard C.' Clapper / /
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
A~EN SANITATION DIS I ~ICT
P. O. Box 528
Tele. 925.3601
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
,.;.......,0>'"
January 30, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman
P. O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado
Yaw Ltd
81611
RE: PROPOSED 500 SOUTH GALENA PROJECT
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the above referenced project with regard to the quality
of sewer service to the proposed building development. I understand the
project to consist of (16) one-bedroom condominium units and (1) studio
employee uni t.
The project is presently served by an 8" sewer line in serviceable con-
dition, extending up South Galena Street adjacent to the project site.
The present sewer plant capacity is 2.0 million gallons per day (M.G.D.),
which is presently utilized at approxomately 1,569 M.G.D., or 75% of
capacity. A new addition to the plant in 1980 will increase plant capa-
city by an additional 1.0 M.G.D.
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of 100 gall dayl
person to project occupancy standards of 1.5 persons per one-bedroom unit
and 1.25 persons per studio unit, the total project would generate less
than 2600 gallons per day. This would add less than 1/7 of one percent
to the utilization of present capacity.
Due to the uncertainty of the total number of proposed units and their
locations under the Growth Management Plan, the total impact of the
approved units on the collection sewer lines can not be evaluated until
such time as the information for all projects under the Growth Management
Plan is available.
There presently exists sufficient plant capacity to treat the proposed
proj ecL
If there are any questions, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
~~.-
He i ko Kuhn
District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District
o
o
.'
.-:
(
~
-
=a:
I'
go
,
i'
,-
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
SOCIAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES
(aa) Public Transportation
The evaluation is the ability of the project to be serviced by
public transportation.
As shown on the Vicinity Map, this section, the project is located
350 feet from the Durant Avenue bus route and the Rubey Park
Transit Station. These distances equate to a I! minute walking
distance, thus easily accessible.
Reference
A. Project Vicinity Map; this section
B. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
(bb) Police Protection
The evaluation is the ability of the Police Department to provide
normal protection services to the project with current personnel
and equipment.
Conversations with Aspen Police Department personnel indicate
the average response time to this proj ect would be I-I! minutes
and that this project would not extend present patrol routes. No
additional police personel will be required to provide normal
protective services to the project.
The project is bounded on two sides by public roadways thus
facilitating access and visual control from patrol vehicles.
Additionally, a private security patrol service will be retained
on a continuing basis to provide normal protective services thus
reducing the frequency necessary for public police patrol.
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
/,....,.
v
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(cc) Child Care Facilities
The evaluation is the provision of a child care facility within
the Proj ect.
A child care facility will be provided for this project.
Space requirements will conform to the Minimum Rules and
Regulations for Child Care Centers - Colorado State Department
of Social Services.
In addition to interior space and outdoor play area provided for
the project generated children (ages 1-8), the child care facility
will be large enough to absorb certain of the needs of the im-
mediate neighborhood.
Ms. Terry End, Director of the Aspen Montessori School, will
serve as consultant to this element of the project.
(dd) Bicycle/Pedestrian Paths
The evaluation is the location of the project relative to pedestrian
and bicycle path systems.
The project is located 1 block (120 ft. ) from the proposed City
bike and pedestrian trail and approximately 450 ft. to the Galena
Street pedestrian mall. As shown on the Site Vicinity Map, this
section, these systems are within easy pedestrian access of the
Project.
Additionally connecting to the City sidwalk system, the Project
development will provide sidewalks along the S. Galena Street
perimeter of the site.
Reference
A. Site Vicinity Map; this section
B. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
.
~
.,
..... f
..
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(ee) Recycling Facilities
The evaluation is the provision of refuse recycling facilities in
the project development.
Such facilities will be provided in the park garage portion of the
project, conveniently accessible to both occupants and pick up
of the separated refuse by the recycle center vehicle.
Consistant with the recommendation of Mr. Dennis Holmes of
the City Recycling Center the Project will have separate containers
for glass, tin, aluminum, and newspapers in a location accessible
to a parked 5 ton flatbed truck, 20 feet long.
(ff) Design Features for the Handicapped
The evaluation is the ability of the project to accommodate safe,
convenient movement for handicapped persons.
The site and building design will permit unobstructed movement
(for a wheel chair confined person) from any location in the
covered parking garage to virtually every condominium unit.
This is accomplished by means of hydraulic elevator and path
surfaces which will not exceed a slope of 1: 15 (U. B. C. requirement).
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
B. Floor Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
(gg) Proximity to Commercial Support Facilities
The evaluation is convenient walking distance from the project
to commercial support facilities.
,y""'"
..
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
This project is located! block from the C-C Zone and approxi-
mately 450 feet (l! minutes walking distance) from the Galena
Street Mall, thus are easily accessible pedestrian destinations
from the project.
Reference
A. Site Vicinity Map; this section
c
...
-
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
EMPLOYEE HOUSING
The evaluation is the percentage of low income housing units
provided by the development.
45% of the total project units are designated as low income
housing.
For detailed information on the employee housing proposal for
this project see the Social Facilities and Services Section; 925
Durant project submission, following.
-FI~ 51AnON
HI&HW\Yl3t(M'J~ 5T.--i
EXl'5Tl~& MlUS
1U6NEl': mK
~M<.5lAf1t1.l
W?1'rUl'E
fl7ml1l/I. eo'.> La?!"
UFT I.A
-)
rumrr AVE~UE
LlT1LE. ~E.LL LIFT
~D CI1Y Ti'AlL
I"<OJECT ~
&ALBlA 5ll':EET
MILL ST1<l:ET
. COMME:rLIAL CCfi:
~ CCl1ME:f'W>L LroSf
e: :1 LDWE: l
[]]]] n:51~f.lTW. .1'7. LDWE
I1IlIm./rueLIc
Vicinity Map
~
o 200 400 800
~
~
I(\.Wfm 5VJl0\.l~
lIlmtr A'iBUE~ e
,
Hl!mIr
J
Jre-~
~l
l -~
~
LlTlLE Io-ell.
r1ml-I1W. elb I.LZJl"
fJELL LIfT
CCIl11~6WJ.. IIIll
TImE ~
llmE I.lX:GE
ALrE~ llLU-
5TUP' 5Un:S
PJl'IIlr=
Site Context
r-~
o 000 "'"
,
800
r.:~"\
~
THE 500 SOUTH GALENA STREET PROJECT COPL.AND HAGMAN YAW LTO ARCHITECTS
A"f" " C"lo~ ,do
o
o
"
"
.
925 DURANT
PRQJECr
Grovvth Management
Plan Submission
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Submitted to:
City of Aspen Planning Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
Applicant:
Mr. Hans Cantrup
P. O. Box 388
Aspen, Colorado
Architect:
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
210 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
""'""
.
500 S. Galena
925 Durant
Combined Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
GENERAL REVlEW INTRODUCTION
Submitted for GMP review as one project this submission con-
sists of development planning on two separate land parcels:
The 500 S. Galena portion of the project on which (16) free-
market units and (1) employee unit are planned; the 925 Durant
portion of the project on which (12) low income studio units are
planned.
The respective locations of the two project entities are shown on
the Project location map, following page.
The review criteria denoted in the Growth Management Allotment
Application is basically, and most easily, structured for evlaua-
tion of a project proposed for development on a single land parcel.
To facilitate review and evaluation of this project, which combines
development on two land parcels, we have submitted each develop-
ment component in a separate section of this portfolio. Each of
the two parcels proposed for development have been treated in-
dividually as to their respective compliance with GMP criteria.
The 500 S. Galena portion is discussed in the first portion of the
submission and the 925 Durant portion in this portion.
o
o
I
ii1
3
Qo
f.
-
J
:J
4
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
INTRODUCTORY
1. Project Name:
925 Durant Project
2. Location:
Lots F, G, H, I: Block 119
City of Aspen
3. Parcel Size:
12,000 sq. ft.
4. Current Zoning District:
RMF, City of Aspen
5. Zoning Under Which
Application is Filed:
RMF, City of Aspen
6. Maximum Buildout
Under Current Zoning:
12 Studio units
7. Total Number of Units
Proposed and Bedroom Mix:
12 low-income studio units
8. Size of Units:
Studio employee unit @ 425
square feet each
9. Price Range for Sale
or Rent:
Studio employee unit rented at
$175 per month
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
10. Program Narrative
The site plan is organized to create maximum open space fronting on
the public (Durant Ave.) side of the project development and to permit
the staggered architectural form which relates to the residential scale
characterizing the majority of structures in the immediate neighoorhood.
The building is organized in a 2-level stacking arrangement with in-
dividual unit plans staggered to permit multiple view orientation and to
further reduce building scale.
Consistant with convenience and visual objectives the required on-site
parking is located to the alley side of the building immediately adjacent
to covered paths and access stairs to the individual units.
Utilizing contemporary forms and components/the architecture of the
building accomplishes a victorian scale in its facade elements. Masonry
bearing walls, wood siding, and projecting balcony elements characterize
the exterior design of the building.
The site will be landscaped to create greenspace and privacy for the
lower level units.
The F. A. R. permitted by zoning is 1: 1 or, 12,000 sq. ft. for this site.
The project development, comprised of 7000 sq. ft. in total, uses only
60% of the permitted floor area.
The building footprint of 3300 s. f. covers only 27% of the available
land parcel.
11. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses
As shown on the Vicinity Map, the project is located on Durant Avenue,
east of OrininaI Street.
The project and the immediate environs are zoned RMF.
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Surrounding land uses are lodges, condominiums, apartment units
and assorted Single-family residential units. Building complexes
in the immediate surrounds are: The Alpina Haus Lodge; Silverglow
Apts. ; Chateau Snow Lodge; Old Hundred Condominiums; and The
VagaIxmd Lodge.
,
^ /iodp
~,~~
925 Durant
Project
r
>
~
~
~
I
800
~ I
o 200 400
WEST END ST.
D
OLD ON. '"' rl
CO'COM"'" 'U
o
UJ
~
I-
~
a:
::l
o
C1
c=J
D
o
I
\~
Site Plan
925 DURANT AVE. PROJECT
~
~
01020 40 80
I
._Xl
-
:z:
I-
a:
o
z
,
z
o
fii
>
UJ
...
UJ
:z:
o
I-
UJ
:.:
l/)
ARCHITECTU RAL
~
THE 925 DURANT AVENUE PROJECT COPLANO HAGMAN YAW LTD ARCHITECTS
Asp," Colo~,,,,o
,
cE
STUDIO
I
1r
"~
Typical Unit Plan
925 DURANT PROJECT
Size 425 S.1.
Rent $ 175 / month
~ I
o 2 4 8
I
16
~
o
o
~
C'"
-
n'
~
<
~.
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
PUBLIC SERVICES
(aa) Water System
The evaluation is the capacity of the public water system to provide
for the needs of the proposed development without treatment plant or
other facility upgrading beyond those provided by the developer.
The project water demand is directly related to the fixture unit count,
consisting of 144 F. U., which converts to 55 GPM: maximum probable
flow (l!" water service) or approximately 100 gal. /day /person as per
current ASHRE guide standards. The project is presently served by a
6" water main located in Durant Ave., adjacent to the project site,
which will provide good flow at adequate pressure to the proposed
development.
A project review by Mr. James Maralunus indicates that no fore-
seeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing water service at
adequate pressure levels and no substantive impact on the treatment
plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75% capacity, will
result from the project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Project review letter from Mr. James J. Markalunus,
Aspen Water Department, this section
(bb) Sewer System
The evaluation is the capacity of the public sewage disposal system
to serve the proposed development without system extensions and
without treatment plant upgrading.
The project site is served by an existing 8" sewer line in serviceable
condition extending along Durant Ave. and located directly adjacent to
the project site.
".''''-
'\i,.,
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of
lOa/gal. /day /person to project occupancy standards of 2.0 persons
per studio unit, the total project would generate only 2400 gallons
per day. This would add less than 1/7 of one percent to the plant
capacity. thus is well within the service capability of the present
capacity.
A preliminary project review by Mr. Heiko Kuhn indicates that no
foreseeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing sewage
service to this project and no substantive impact on the treatment
plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75% capacity,
will result from this project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Project review letter from Mr. Heiko Kuhn, District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District, this section
(cc) Stann Drainage
The evaluation is the capacity of drainage facilities to adequately
dispose of surface runoff without public drainage system expansion.
The drainage control system for this project will collect and retain
all site runoff and interrupted subsurface flow with on-site drainage
facilities. The project shall have a series of dry wells and retention
water runoff. Consistant with standard engineering practice, the
drywells will have overflow outlets extending to Durant Avenue.
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
.''M__-'
...........
,
'''',/
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(dd) Fire Protection
The evaluation is the ability of the Fire Department to provide
fire response to the project according to the established response
standards.
The project site is located approximately 2100 L. F. (5 city blocks)
from the fire station and can expect a maximum response time of
4! minutes from alert siren to equipment arrival at site fire location.
The project site is served by (2) hydrants with adequate static pres-
sure for fire protection. Two adjacent roadways, Durant Avenue
and alley way, provide immediate access for fire vehicles.
The building development will be additionally protected by a dry
standpipe system, and ionic smoke detection in individual units.
A project review by Mr. Willard Clapper indicates no foreseeable
deficiencies exist with regard to fire protection.
Reference:
A. Project Vicinity Map, this section
B. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
C. Project review letter by Mr. Willard C. Clapper
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
(ee) Parking Design
The evaluation is the design of required parking with respect to
visual impact, exposed paving, convenience and safety.
All required parking for this project is located directly off-alley,
permitting direct access to individual units via covered walkways
and stairways to upper levels. All parking is visually removed
from Durant Avenue and public pedestrian routes serving the
neighborhood.
Reference
A. Site Plan, Physical Design & Program Section
.-..
"'......
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(ff) Roads
The evaluation is the capacity of existing roads to service project
traffic without substantially overloading or altering traffic patterns.
As shown on the Site Context Drawing, this section, the project is
located on Durant Avenue approximately one-half block east of
Westend Avenue.
Examination of the traffic impact of the project is primarily based
on work generated by the UMTA transportation study and on recent
conversations with Mr. Steve Lockwood, Alan M. Voorhess & Assoc.,
rnc., traffic consultant for the UMT A study.
The table below presents the trip type and trip frequencies per day
per unit for a project unit as estimated by Mr. Lockwood. The 6.5
trips per unit is less than the 10.0 trips per unit for a typical resi-
dential unit, because the project consists of studio units generating
less people than larger apa rtment or condominium units. Total
trips are estimated between automobile and non -automobile trips.
Trip Type
Estimated
One-Way Trips
Estimated
Non -automobile
trip percentage
Estimated Non-
automlx>ile trips
Skiing/
Recreation*
.75
60%
.5
1. 25
75%
75%
1.5
Work
2.00
Shopping and
Entertainment
.9
Personal
Business
1. 00
50%
.5
Other
1. 50
~
. 4
6.50
60% average
3.8
*The 60% non-automobile average for recreation trips assumes ap-
proximately 75%-80% of ski trips are non-automobile hIt only 50%-55%
of summer recreation trips are non-automobile.
---
-
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Due to the project's convenient location to downtown Aspen and
public transportation, it is estimated a high percentage (60% to 75%)
of skiing, work, shopping and entertainment trips will be non-
automobile trips.
As shown, potentially 60% of the total projected trips per unit
will be non-automobile trips. The estimated 2.8 automobile one-
way trips per day are equivalent to a resident's using his car on
an average of approximately one time per day. The walking and
public transportation convenience of the project's location plus
the project's low resident population results in minimal traffice
impact created by the project.
Current detail traffic counts are not available for the area to
quantitatively estimate traffic impact.
(gg) Energy
The evaluation is ability of the project, its spaces and users, to
maximize the conservation of energy.
Consistant with the solar geography of the site, all project con-
struction will be designed and built to maximize solar utilization
and to minimize heat loss, thus reducing the demand placed on the
, fossil fuel resource for space heating. The following techniques
will be implemented in this project.
Insulation
Significantly exceeding regulatory thermal standards, exterior
walls will be insulated to R=26 to 28 min. ; roof composites to
R=42; floor composite to R=20, foundation perimeters to R=14.
Architectural
Architectural design configures building to optimize thermal
cha-racteristics of the project. Exterior wall exposure is mini-
mized by maximum unit adjacency (common wall), and by vertical
space organization (minimum ratio of exterior surfaces per sq. ft.
of occupied space). All buildings are oriented with high use
interior spaces to the south to achieve view while maximizing
passive solar heating potential.
c
,
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Glazed openings on non-south exposures will be limited to
Uniform Building Code minimums (to comply with ventilation
requirements). Opening surround details will be required to
minimize heat loss due to infiltration.
Totallyflat roof surfaces are designed for all units to retain the
additional insulation value of snowfall layers.
Devices
Consistant with solar geography of site, solar collectors will
be utilized for domestic hot water heating. Electri.c energy will
be designated for primary space heating to reduce fossil fuel
demand (approximately 50% of electric power used in Aspen area
is hydro-generated). Automatic thermostats will be specified to
control night time space temperatures. Fireplace design will use
double damper control, exterior combustion air, glazed fire opening,
and heat return ducting. Humidification will be used to reduce tem-
perature required to achieve equal comfort levels.
Reference
A. Architectural Drawings; Physical Design and Program Section
RI'!: '3rIlJ1ON
EXI5Tl~G I"\AJ..L
-11~lml\llir-
..,
1!l~ - C1UJl(( f'O..E ~
~~PCrTY
TJ<AIL.
IiIiI COMMERCw.. COO:
_ KESt>1:N1lAl.!MUI:r\-F.M1ILY
IIIJill Rf;'3[;fflflPL (p
mm K~c;wr1Jl(.. IS
_~!/'lItlL1C
Vicinity Map
~
o 200 400 800
~
'-EST E~D smET
IJIj
I](] lJDCJ
CfJArEAU Wo'IlNe
~ ~a.lI5
IN1>WND LDOOE
CU> I-\U~D Wi-l1A%
DUmrr AIJE~UE
~
t)~ I
(IIlIIIIIl dJ ~Tc>.l"\JDU?ES
L' TII] - ~
~ ~~~
~
..._0",
- ..
ALl"lNA K'I5
t'ED'C.'JED ALlEY
C~~
~ 'Om LoreE
W/ilUS AVE~UE
Site Context
~
050'100 200
~
(
" ,/
>"-
PEN
130 s
January 25, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P.O. Box 2736
Aspen, colorado 81611
RE: 925 Durant Project
Lots F, G, H, I : Block 119
Dear Mr. Yaw:
It is my understanding that the 925 Durant Project is
the Employee housing portion of a Growth Management
Plan Submission and as such includes 12 studio units.
The project site is served by a 6" C.I.P. water main
along Durant Avenue, which terminates approximately
130 feet east of the project site, on Durant Avenue.
Two existing hydrants, No. 105 and No. 106, are located
approximately 215 feet and 150 feet, respectively, from
the project site, and they have tested static pressures
of 90 psi and 82 psi, respectively.
After reviewing the development proposed for this project,
it is my determination that an acceptable level of water
service can be provided by the existing system.
vtry trull your), J
11 dCJ{~ .--
~. Markalunus
/"'.....
A~N SANITATION DIS1..1CT
P. O. Bo, 528
Tele. 925.360t
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
January 30, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P. O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: PROPOSED 925 DURANT PROJECT
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the subject project with regard to the quality of sewer
service available to the proposed building development. It is my under-
standing that this project is the employee housing portion of a Growth
Management Plan submission and as such, is comprised of (12) studio units.
The project is presently served by an 8" sewer line, in serviceable con-
dition, located in Durant Avenue adjacent to the project site. The pres-
ent sewer plant capacity is 2.0 million gallons per day (M.G,D.) of which
capacity is presently utilized to the extent of 1.569 M.G.D., or at 75%
of capacity. A new addition to the plant in 1980 will increase plant
capacity by an additional 1.0 M.G.D.
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of 100 galldayl
person to project occupancy standards of 2.0 persons per studio unit, the
total project would generate 2400 gallons of waste water per day. This
would add less than 1/7 of one percent to the utilization of present
capacity.
Due to the uncertainty of the total number of proposed units and their
locations under the Growth Management Plan, the total impact of the
approved units on the collection sewer lines can not be evaluated until
such time as the information for all projects under the Growth Management
Plan is available.
There presently exists sufficient plant capacity to treat the proposed
project.
If there are any questions, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
~~
He i ko Kuhn
District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District
--
,
-
"
January 25, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P.O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: 925 DURANT PROJECT
LOTS F, G, H, I: BLOCK 119
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the development proposal for the above
referenced project with regard to fire protection.
It is my understanding that the project is the employee
housing portion of a Growth Management Plan submission
which will include (12) studio units on two levels.
The two nearest fire hydrants, No. 105 and No. 106, are
located within 200 feet of the project site and have
tested static pressures of 90 psi and 82 psi, respectively.
The location of fire hydrants relative to this project
permits good fire coverage with adequate pressure levels.
The site plan indicates that fire vehicles will have good
access to the project from both Durant Avenue and the alley
behind the project.
The location of the project relative to the fire station
permits the prompt response time necessary to deal with
fire related problems.
It is my opinion that the development proposed for this
site poses no foreseeable deficiencies related to fire
protection.
Very ~ruly yours,
) ! , ,'/ II i
f.< ,; Ii., j f:/{/(:i:' '-'~,
wl1~ard C. Clapper
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
o
o
-,
.'1.
"
'I
.,
~
"
r.
-
~
-
;::;
.0
go
'.
,
I
../
,
.
o
o
c
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
SOCIAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES
(aa) Public Transportation
The evaluation is the ability of the project to be serviced by public
transportation.
As shown on the Vicinity Map, this section, the project is located
350 ft. from the East Cooper and Cleveland bus stop and 550 ft. from
the Durant Avenue and Original bus stop. Public transportation, thus,
is within a 1-1 minute walking distance of this project.
Reference
!e
A. Vicinity Map, this section
B. Site Context Map, this section
(bb) Police Protection
TIle evaluation is the ability of the Police Department to provide
normal protection services to the project with current personnel
and equipment.
Conversations with Aspen Police Department personnel indicate
the average response time to this project would be 1-2 minutes and
that this project would not extend present patrol routes. No ad-
ditiona police personel will be required to provide normal pro-
tective services to the project.
TIle project is bounded by two roadways (Durant Avenue and the
alley way), facilitating access and visual control from patrol vehicles.
Additionally, a private security p<1trol service will be retained on
a continuing basis to provide normal protective services, thus re-
ducing the frequency necessary for public police patrol.
Reference
o
A. Site Context Map, this section
,
'". j
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(cc) Child Care Facilities
The evaluation is the provision of a child care facility within the
Project.
A child care facility will be provided for this project, to be lo-
cated at a grade level within the employee housing complex.
Space requirements will conform to the Minimum Rules and
Regulations for Child Care Centers - Colorado State Department
of Social Services.
In addition to interior space and outdoor play area provided for
the project generated children (ages 1-8), the child care facility
will be large enough to absorb certain of the needs of the im-
mediate neighborhood.
Ms. Terry End, Director of the Aspen Montessori School, will
serve as consultant to this element of the project.
(dd) Bicycle/Pedestrian Paths
The evaluation is the location of the project relative to pedestrian
and bicycle path systems.
Within easy access of path systems, the project is: 650 ft. from
the existing Ute Avenue pedestrian/bicycle trail; 450 ft. to Glory
Hole Park; 1600 ft. to the downtown pedestrian mall system.
Linking to the city sidewalk system, a sidewalk will be provided by
the project development along Durant Avenue.
Reference
A. Vicinity Map, this section
B. Site Plan, Physical Design and Program Section
, ,/
"
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(ee) Recycling Facilities
The evaluation is the provision of refuse recycling facilities in
the project development.
Such facilities will be provided near the parking area of the project,
conveniently accessible to both occupants and pick up of the sep-
arated refuse by the recycle center vehicle.
Consistant with the recommendation of Mr. Dennis Holmes of the
City Recycling Center the project will separate containers for glass,
tin, aluminum, and newspapers in a location accessible to a parked
5 ton flatbed truck, 20 feet long.
Reference
A. Site Plan, Physical Design and Program Section
(if) Design Features for the Handicapped
The evaluation is the ability of the project to accommodate safe,
convenient movement for handicapped persons.
The site and building design will permit unobstructed movement
(for a wheel chair confined person) from any parking space to the
(6) lower level studio units. This is accomplished by walking sur-
faces which will not exceed a slope of 1:15 (D. B. C. requirement)
Reference
A. Site Plan, Physical Design and Program Section
(gg) Proximity to Commercial SupPJrt Facilities
The evaluation is convenient walking distance from the Project to
commercial sUpPJrt facilities.
~,.."
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
The project is conveniently located I! blocks from the City Market/
Durant Mall and approximately 1600 feet from the downtown pedestrian
mall system (5! minutes walking distance).
Reference
A. Vicinity Map, this section
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
EMPLOYEE HOUSING
The evaluation is the percentage of low and moderate income housing
units provided by the development proposal.
45%-59% of project units designated Low Income housing are awarded
12 points.
The 925 Durant Project is the employee housing portion of a complete
GMP proposal which combines two development locations (925 Durant
and 500 S. Galena) as the total project submission.
The total project submission is comprised of 29 total units of which
16 units are designated as single bedroom condominiums and 13 units
as studio employee units. The project is designed to provide 12
employee units, located at 925 Durant, to the low income employee
group at large and I employee unit specifically for managers quarters
attendant to 500 South Galena condominiums.
As shown by the typical unit plan on this section, each studio unit is
approximately 425 s. f. and is additionally supported by common
laundry, storage and day care facilities. Larger than normal this
studio is designed to accommodate shared living space for a mini-
mum of 2 occupants. Upon receiving GMP approval that portion of
the project comprising employee housing would be immediately
constructed and available for occupancy prior to December, 1978.
The employee unit mix and rent structure for this project is sub-
mitted as follows:
No. % of Total * Annual Total * Annual
of total monthly Income monthly Income
Units project Designation rent/one Group/ rent/two Group/
units occupant each occupants each
occupant occupant
13 45% Low Income $175/mo. $7000/yr. $200/mo. $4000/yr.
* Annual income group calculated using 30% of gross annual income
allocated to housing cost (Planning Office Standard).
,r
.
.......,
"'".",/'
925 Durant Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
The rental structure for the employee units is designed to permit
a necessary low income support group to maintain affordable housing
within walking distance of major employment generators in Aspen.
Spending 30% of annual income for rent a single occupant making
$7000/yr. may afford a studio or, if sharing a studio, 2 persons
making $4000/yr. each can afford a unit in this project. Assuming
100% double occupancy, the (13) units provided would house 26 low
income employees whose annual income is $40OO/yr. or greater.
This project is within easy walking distance of all major employ-
ment, shopping and recreational destinations in Aspen.
A total of (12) points is anticipated under the housing section for
this project submission.
Reference:
A. Typical Unit Floor Plan; this section
B. Architectural Drawings; Physical Design and Program Section
RrE '3TPJ\0f.l
W'bNEI: rm\
1IIIIIIIIIIlllj~'~-
~
::D~ -0\..DI(yHl!.Ef,>,><:K
~mm,.OEP GllY
T~L
~ COMMERCw. C~
_ RE~t;;IOmw.. (MULTI-FAMILY
_ RE'SIrElJIlIt (P
mID RHCUITlAL- IS
_ FMK/fUJLIC
Vicinity Map
r~1
o 200 400 800
L,,~~'"~':J
\~
THE 825 DURANT AVENUE PROJECT COPLANC HAGMAN YAW LTO ARCHITECTS
A.pen C:Olo~..do
CLD Kuw;nl/ [.O.1[V;
lrIJ~'lJDJCJ
CfJATEAU IW'l'JN9
~ A~ENF->
IJ'bIU>I.ID LDroE
1J5T END smET
..._"w
- ..
K\'t>IW-If
r\LI"lNA fl6lF.,
PJI'AIlI AVENUE
~
I<OI<:IIle ~ An:;.
VlOD'{.([E1/ ALLEY
~ sW'. LOreE
CIWEAIJ 'ONIM
WJEI:!'> AVENUE
Site Context
~
050100 aoo
~
THE 925 DURANT AVENUE PROJECT COPLANO HAGMAN YAW L.TO A~CHITECTS
A'll." , C;"ID~n"o
,r-.,
",,"
cB
STUDIO
1r
Typical Unit Plan
925 DURANT PROJECT
Size 425 s.f.
Rent $ 175/ month
~ I
o 2 4 8
I
16
~
j Recor:rlcndpd Poi nt All ccat ion
, Residential Propusals
sc~t- ~:~t ~
Projcct -$l, ,~.-
Date
YJw /~ /rPr
--+--.-----
A. Puhlic Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - rlaximum of
3 points per rcviev; element).
1. \later Serv i \=e
;
,
---~------_._--
___,___---1-.__ -- .------.- ._-
I
_.d_____
--------..----------.-----
2. Sewer Service
/
------~_._-_.-_.---
----....----~._._---_._~._.
--~===
3. Storm Drainage
----------,---~.
---------------..-------.
-2---
-~_._---._-
4. Fire Protection
-_.~-_._---._--------+_.-
--.----.---..-----.--.....-.------
--.------ --~ - ~,._._-~---_.__..
-~---
5. Parking Design
-:J!!.' ~~i~_______
6: Roads
---3---- .
------- -- -..-----------------.-------------------
...------------.--- ---.-.---.- ---..- --.----.-- ---- ----.-----.---..-.-.. --.-~
+._--------_.._--_.__.._-.---~---------_._---_.- -._---_._----_._-~------
--.-3-----.
7. Elle.^CJ:!
.---.--.--+ -.-.--..--.,p- ~--- -~-_.__.. ,.------------...-- ---_._-_._.~-~ ---~-_._---_._--_.-
_____ _. _._~..__ ,_...____ .__._ _ _ ___ _ _, .__.__ .._.___. h_ ___P ___._._ _~_.. ______~.._._____.__ --~-.---
.. - _~...~. __~._""._._._..~___ ___ _._ - '_' ___ __ - - ._'_' ... _____~__ ,..._ ___u__._ _'__'_' __. __. _ __~...___._..___....._
1'1
B. Social Facilities and Services (~aximul'l of 1~ ooints)
"
1. Public Transportati~n
I
--"..----..-
_______~.__._________~___R_______
-.-~--_._._._-_. ~-
------.--.-------
-------------_.~_._-------_.--------------.~_._------
~--~-------
2. Police Protection
_h:JJ_, /Ct(!i{/1L~A-~ -'
--.-.-..-----
_..------------~----_.
3.~~~:: Facilities, ___.d.. ----
~ ~lL&:2_ ,lfltl-tJ:f:LLt~ ----,' -----
~----.---- -_._--~~------------ ------ ----
_._----,.---------_._~-_._-------_.~~--_.-
4. Bicycle Paths
---.-1-----
....------.-----...-...------.
--~-----~-----_.-
__________._____._____v__.__________
5. Re~cling Facilities_ , ---~_.._-
,:.;;( 7vJ '/ ':j!:!:t'1/ _ q;z _~~(,~..J-/ n~.t!' '
_._--,--'-_._-~----------------_._-_.._-_._-
-------~-----.__._------.._-
--d~--, --
6: HanPjcapped Design Features
/ t:in~12 J ..dJJL.1t~/KL~
-.-------..--
.-~----_._--
__..........____._ _." .____0
-.------"-.----------..- _._--------~---
7. co~nercial Support Proximi~y
_I
."~._----~. ----------~----
------_._---_._---_.~---_..- ..---
--_._---p-_..--~--~._-------."_.__._- -~------~---_.-. - .--- --_.-.--
C. Housing (c1aximum of 30 ('oints)
1. i1iddle
2. f'lodera te
3. LO\~ '-/SO)
_ /2-: "
---.---. ........---.-.---.-.--.-. . ._.-..__.-~.. - .----..---- _.__.._~.. -.----.-. -.. ~... ---_._--~--.._...-.
______~___.___.._.4__.________. .__ .____..._ 4_' - _... .".._ _..._____~_ _.-. n'_' --..-.------ ... .-, .._.- .-.-.--.-...
..._._-_.~- .._.._._---~--. .-' --...- -., -.--....... ~ ~-~ _.... .-.. -..... ~. ~ .---. .-._-.--.~.- ------
...- -.-.., - - . -- -... ----"..- . .-' ,. ----.
,,~J
Lju
Sub Total of,Above,Points
Bonus Poi nts
l~ F/Jr' tI/72I.U/tl/10I"7ld '7;du[~11
I - ~?llll(l?fc '-/?tu iJi't<-j
TOTAL POHl
Y-
~
Nal'le
'-
.
,
Rcco~lI-:1end('d Point Allccation
Residential Proposals
Project CjPI) <S' 67fitFNi-/.
q'lt; 'l7ul7lWl
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - "maximum of
3 points per revievl element).
Date "__~.4e_________
1. !'later Servi ce
~
-----------------~.
___2::-- _
-- ----_.
2. Sewer Service
-------.-----
?
3. Storm Drainage
---------'
~---
_L______
4. Fire Protection
----_.__._------_..~--~-----_.
5. Parking Design
- ?_--
'3
6. Roads
._--~---------------------~-----------~------~--
---------------- -~------ -~- ,'-. ------------ .._---_.- --.--------.--.-----
--~----- ._--~---_.._-.-_.- ----.----.--- -.-----.--.----. ------
"___3__---0
7. Enerr!::
-.----.- . ------..-. -,-,- ------.---. . ------------ .-+ ----.----- -,"---'--- ---- --_..~_.
_.....-~. -., - ..---.---.--------- ------ --.--.-- ._--- .-.._-- - -_.._- ---..--------.---.- --.-.------.
... ._ _ _._. ______._._____ _._..~.______ .__'___~'''_'_'' _ .. _..__.____~ 4_ .. _ ..._..__ ,___"____" -----~.-.--- .---.----..
(/'1
.-:!
I
,"""'"
'-""'-,
",""" "
B.. Social Facilitie~ and Services (maximum of l~ 06ints)
1
\
1. Pub'l i c Transp~rtati r>n
,..-,~i._n
i '
----- ---l~----------=~-=-=~=~='~=~~~===
---._------_._------_._~
____L_..
2. Police Protection
=:.~-===
3. c~ilccare Fac11ities
__-L..______,___ --. .
_._-------------~------_..------
-----:--=:___z _~:
4. Bicycle Paths
-----~.__.~------_._--_.~.._--------_.~.~-~._--.-----_.--
----~----_._---
---,._~---~------_.
5. Recycling Facilities
_____Z-_.__
- --------------..-----
---.----
.-----------.--- --------~
-_.__._--~--_._----...-----
---------------
-_".%-_-------
6. Handicapped Design Features
~---- -- ---------.-
2-
7. Commercial Support Proxjmi~y
" /2-- \
------------_...,--~ )
----------------.--- --~._------_..._._-.._.-.-- _._---
C. II0using (~laximum of 30 Qoints)
1. i1iddle
__ ..1"2/-----
2. 1'1odera te
3. LOIY
__._______________.___.__ _. ~__~._____ . - - __.__...__.__.__ ...__..._..._ 0"" _....___ _.____ -... _.~.-
._-_._-,---,_.,-,-",-~"--"-~----'----"" -..,. ---'-"-'--'~'"'- --- ----..-........-.. .-.. .._- .,.- .-....-...
----_._..~-- .-.----,-----..--...- ".-- .-.'-"-.". ,,-_. - - ..... _.---~._-~-_.. . ........-..- ._..-..-~
"',..'....
4S___:
Sub Tbtal of Above Points
Bonus Poi nts
"2,
L
2
'Po fJ fAc: _ll.1JfJ('(: ~ f rJPk.!~---
~CIAL. - (O,Jirflt -I f-!i1/JD)(','I'?"o) ___.
t ()/,tJ IN t'ttvJE f!1M1^.l6.]
TOTAL POUlTS
11
fjal!1e
(, 0 ~Ur)
Recor.!r~end2d Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
S<>'" ({,<lIe",Q
Project f'~s O<l;('4,,-r
Date
4111('(' {
/</, 1'1).Y
/
A. Public Facilities and Services (rnaximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per revievl element).
1. Water Service
L__
-------"--~--_._-
---_._------"----._._-_.~------_._----.-- --_._~-
2. Sel'ier Service ______1__._
3. Storm Drainage
---~-
4. Fire Protection
...L___
------.-----....----- ---~._----_._-------
_._------~-------~----------.-~-----
------.-- ---~.-- --_._----_._-----~--_..
5. Parking Desi911
-~
_._----~-----_.._-. _._._--_._-~._---
---.--- ---"--
--._-- --
6. Roads n
------=- .
----,._---~----~- -----
-----~-------,------
-.-----.-..----.--------
~--~-_..._-_.~----_._----_._----.-
7. Ener9.\'
~
---------~_._-.
-------------------.-..------.
--------.-------..---.------------..
II
...L ..M__
.-'.......
.
"'",.,....,;'
B. Social Facilities and Services (l'laximuf'l of 1~, ooints)
1. Public Transportation
___--1-._
2. Police Protection
/
3. childcare Facilities
_____..0_____
4. Bicycle Paths
__.__L...._
5. Recycling Facilities
___,_....L___
6. Handicapped Design Features
___1..____,
7. cOI~rnercial Support Proximity
___L__
--------?;
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points)
1. i1iddle
2. 1'lodera te
3. Low
'I
-_.J.i.&---f 5
.
)
Sub Total of Above Points
Bonus Poi nts
dL
o
TOTAL porrHS
if1
Na~e d ~() (!~
.---....~._. .~-.~..-,~-
.
\
Rccor.lI~endecj Poi nt A 11 ecati on
Residential Proposals
~oo 5.-; C~~'L'.!t";(.'/~)
Project! 02-$ .j..k,./.;:;,,'. -
'-
Date
'31/1-/7 cP
A. Public Facilities and Services (I~aximum of 21 pOints - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. \ia ter Serv i ce
2-
._----
------------------------
2. Sewer Service
----L__ _
3. Storm Drainage
__~1...___
4. Fire Protection
Z-
-----_.._--------_._---~----
~~_._-- --.-.------.-----.-
5. Parking Design
_3___
-~'-------_._----_.._--------
6. Roads
7
7. Enei"9Y
---3---
-------.--------------.--
(jiJ-
,
)
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximu~ of 14 Doints)
1. Public Transportation
~___L_
2. Police Protection
__1
3. chilccare Facilitip.s
----_.~._-
4. Bicycle Paths
L-
I
-------~-
5. Recyclir.g Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
2
7. Commercial Support Proximi~y
2-
-:::::::::::;..-----.-- -
----70)-
(-~--
C. Housing (r:1aximum of 30 points)
1. t1iddle
2. foloderat,
~
-7,-;;-- r
--~---
?~. J F,-. -. '7, .
4 ~- /. 17;.:7 ; wt, t'
,,' ~'. <.;
2 .: (Ir -: .. _~.
..,...
)
,
Sub Total of Above Points
Bonus Points
TOTAL porrJTS
1;;
Nal'1e 0~;: r;" /,,' . 1 S
I
Project ~ ~tr ---
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
Recor.Jr.1endt'd Point Allccation
Residential Proposals
Date
t I1AI". '
Lf ~-WML-_LB__
1. ~ater Servi~e
,
2.
'.
2. Sewer Service
2
-------- -
3. Storm Drainage
_3___
2.____
4. Fire Protection
2-
5. Parking Design
'3
6.' Roads
-------~ -~-.--~---- ---.-_. -~----'__'__' ..__.__.___.______.__r ,._.___
.__.--~--~~.~-------------- -~--_._---_._-------
7. Enei"9Y
-.3-- -----.
_._---~,-- --.----.- .'- - .--_._-----.-.'-----_.-_.._- --------_._-~_._~- -.--"-
/l
- .~._.-.._---._-_._---_.._._-~...- .----.._._-.*... _..-----..- ..-....--..-- .._-- ._~- ~--_.._.~--_.._-_._-_.
\
,,-,,""
B. Social Facilities and Services (:'1aXimUl'lof 14 Doints)
1. Public Transportatirn
2. Police Protection
.
3. chilccare Facilities
4. Bicycle Paths
.~-----_._--------_._--~--------
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
1____
~__L__.
___L____
~
-----~-_.
__.b_____
_..1______
7. Commercial Support Proximi~.'1
----------....-------.......- --_.__._-------~._---....-._- _._----
C. Housing (maximum 'of 30 j)oints)
1. i1iddle
2. r'10dera te
3. LO\~
l~pl
/'
--,._._._._---_.-.__._-~ _.~_..,---~-~. -. --_.~._..
-L___.
!to
-----------.- -----..---.--.---.. ~-. - --_.~--------_._._.__._._.__.. --- --.-..-.--- .-.- _._.~._- '.,-
---~ - --. .--. . -~. ---. '--'--'" ~ . . ._..- ....' .- '.-- - .-- -- '. .- ....-.. -. .-- -. '...-- '-~_. ~ '. ._~--
_~_______~._._,.__~_.___. F'__ _ .. ...__ .___. ___._.._._~________.__. ._." _ ._........,_. .__..~__.._
-
" I
Sub T~tal of Abo~e Points
~1
_./--'---,
Bonus Poi nts
--_.---
Nal!1e
~
TOTAL porrns
~
j
"
.
,
'\?u
t<ccnl::;~l':;n(:C'f! P(Jjn~~ /\-j j(~C,~lt"ICii
F(':Jid('nLi(~'l h~(!liu:~dls
Project ~ C ,,/i'1';-' "I
. ~-_..Y ,: -,'.m..."''":
q/.:.-:. ,u()/*.//f-:-
Date
f\. Public r-0c;liti('>~:.; and ~;C'I'\,'jces (!!1dXiJ!:U:!l of 21. points: l:lC1xiniUil1 of
3 points pCl!" !"cv"ic~\'/ C'!r.::iC;I~_).
1, \_.jot(~l~ :-:~_\rvice
Jt'cf-P1i!N:f,.t. :'~,J:'(!.'o^.'!f
, _Jc;J..L'~"
_CZ/;{<.~; .--/CVfr1:l.d'_'t._ .,
.__u . . ___.. ___"_.~.'._.._,__,_
2. Se~'Jct' S(:l"V -j Cp
, _ jjr; ~,
. ,,-.- - ~_.- . -- - -- -- ._._~
. j/~/G~7 '-. {'c. :.:.1l. :'
l.tZ__
fi1tSi,Ic t;,
3, StOrli1 1;:-aiIFI()p
'r
J_ .
.:_../
j, . ~-.,r(_.;
.' ~~~:_._;"-/tiL~i,'>' , ,
_:.i.~?-Lcd
( t /'--
l' ")',-,'/'''1.""t '
.._'-,.Le.. v:-./, c.,'.'..''''''.
3 "~.....
,fl.':
4. Fil~e r'rc;tpc:ti(ln
, , ,~ AfM1Aill"'('<./.4e/c''/~~ (/;'c "
.- ..-.-.,._.," .---... ..-.......~
~ .."
0I
:-.~.. -
, I'; I" I
I ~"_~'''i,_~.
5. I'Jrkii;\1
1 c.' ~ i
dr.
t~:i~~~",,,.\.:, "" J:.tJ:,t'.....- {.I"r'.I~'_~~ \' r.~({./-c::.v- 9.:4 5.
-f .' v
()<..A.I.'__
,
,
- ..._~: ~_,>-+...i.J;f...
/. " (I
:'~.1_c:.L(~J", _1,__ t ,~___,.. _..~ .
<16:',CL_,,-?tt~' ~~..!:t_t(~ ~.fC-,C_ f
,j&r'!C!!cC' /~(-,:
l 'it:" l~,
C'. ~-\UI:; (;~;
..:.. 7' / ~.-
'-.!....,<I::f~..;,t,(".:
_I ,,' .
17l{~.~-:tc.;
j. ~ ././,) ('Ii ~
'--, """,' L
\
/
.\::".
/ I
~"'-4.{~":- ~
-,- ......-...-...
,)
;/,
-
J. fl~i(J" f/.~L' ~ J.-,3B~>'
~~'aJc~mcn fk,ddR~
.~ ,($LI.'cu-(s,ftW~ fI,," 1MttJt;r1 " . '
,-...I/'"
1
If;
')
I;,
SOCii,11 r-i:\ci 1-i :"if.", and S(Tv-ic('~~
(:>;,1/::::)[!J'i :Jf 10
......,,..,
!JrJ i nts)
1. J;uhlic TratlS[JOrtati0n
, I
l/j.
_:.. _..~_Ci_'-_~,fj:._ __~. ..},,_'.
, , ;/... .
"-. '-' < fll~_.._-,-t:!l.l.Jry_jJl L.:' ~ J
, I I -" - t A
Mv!A" 'C ,--<'.,. ,
""-; , + ~ - ,'. -
(
.~.
,
___ Ja{/,-' :'-',~ .___:>o~/'_
:'
- -j.~,-"--,,, >
2. Po 1 i cc' Protect i Oil
'tJ.:) - ,..... ~ t'\
- ,---."'.-,..'----'------
..
I
/.
?_. -",~_:(.'".
/
"I !~T
-~ '-':.~
3. Chi "I <c.:.)re F;,r"; l";t-:(j'_~
J i '': t "" '." "J /. ! ' I
./!/d~t~(PJJ (Zi,-\/.:..;~,.",.." f.i, If', '1( ~~.. .
..A-j~v,tJ.t/L ,,' A' j"cl.:. _. r, ~ ..(.1P;v
. '", J. L i < u" ' " I t':- .
.6<~'~..i,::_~_,,: (1?~;{;;-;>..::i~; '_~ _'_--~,:~f:'\:,,-~, .~; 'i'-i'~C:-('-' -,t'f~:{: ~~:-
~- . B -i eye 1 e Pat ~ s." - ~ :r. ~--' ,~- /.-\.,. , '" '
. , J '
~ , , ..I'." I
qr."i..,," J "'1./.. t;:.!,...." ~.."'- '
. ~-,"""~C""~.. . ->~-r----( ~~.' .-~~, :...<. -; - -- ---.- ,
,. /','A f"" V ,','v/- ,''/ ,), (
.f'v..:._I_'!~_~!-"'-:/-""!:,,'(-~--<, L..::' .>1(....~.2~~~~_:-
j
/)c""
/-'
-'~,~g_.
7..".' ,
,., "i".~,t,\,-" (',;C/LI (JJ...!
_~Li.':~
J:"'., ,t", It t,"-:)"
, ''<;' :" ',..,-" t.<:"-., / '"
7'l:,''''-. ?/;;?,i"Z
. _....Ai. _ , ,.. ....'.,
. ~.
f<c\,::/c'l ing
.6...
rJLili-hc:~
/!
/
,
LiT,
{)" ~;{-:ii: i CcJ'!JiwJ D~;,'s i ~Pi ~ ;'tu:is
; _I' _ /l~:"
///
''--<",
"..:~," _/-"
_ ,,,J.
7. (:(li'li~le~'c i (11
t,
It
'. -f
/
'~;-'
",.
tf ','
i (
t({ \..({;'"
. _.,---.
,...{,/;'i
.~.,t~...k
j l>~,u
~u:
. I !.1\-'f.JX ~ J:: j -:; 'I
(!aJI.,;
r:
i ; c; :):; 'i ~ ~ ,- ;
,
, 1'12 j: '1 :~i(ji1: c-
,~CI Ll CI i '; t~: )
5-J.. 9' i:J
If ';1':.;;
J. r;] d{;-!l
//
///-;-;
. ~..
~) :'iudcl"tite
( :i,I~~\0
....., /3A_I,,'"'i~A/ //r''/,. ..-",{.~~../, -. /./
, , . . ,.... ..,. V..U "'f,Q /0 ,". ()" ( ~ ! ~V-
,- ,;: ...... /.//
./~(,.:;',V./,/,./:l&tL;., I(~, 'I ~...U'f jf '('
. (l(vJ~. It' l...>!!;o....Q/ !'i" .t{.;,~~ L~' .'~.
.fll-(.,e:~e>?:,d.~~{~<,j ;/!!'.~,,' / W:I' ,\.~r./ fW- '(
~ct ';;,. i2L..J-;~~ ,/' +, 'i,' ,,: ',__I "(It,,, / 4...,
(,4( 'j 'lV.N~; .'"i...J.... A,;Jj',(( ,. '(( /~" ". {'
.
.........""
SUr) Tot!) "1 () f r,OO\:'e Po; nts
Hanus Points
,
I
I
-, .-".- ".--- 'I-
- .---".-----..--.-...-., -'. ..-~-_..._~._._-----_._---
TOTI\l. PO jliTS
/--.........., .:.~' .' ~
~~I I)' .' , ..'
iJal'lf' ,-_,,~.:.::_ ~f--.t' ,/z:{,0.Y '-:'t;,~::ct"'-: ,___ _ '.'
.
c0 fZ'::, :
'76 ,; .C
v .,. ~--:-.~
._----"" .. .-">-.--....
---..>----.--..-:.?--..:::,:
__ _ ..,.,...._o~."'''~,._'"..,^'.._~__ _".,,_",..............,.,.,~..,~'.~,....
q d 5 DL{fQn t- / seD S C;q levtq
Hc~n,j (ctn+rc<.ur
I) IY18 Gmp Appllcc'{fiGIl
l) iJepc{(tvnenf:cd K-e-{e..rnx!s
[IrQ ( sqni {ccftOt1I po i I L.e 1 -en9'neet-in~ (Jv(ckr;
3) .scor-1n3
(J(CUltl<rl? O{-+lc:e, Pt-Z,
Ll) ~ rnp SWnllS .4 p~c:J~ [)eTor~ Clfl.{ {(Jeer) c.i I
Ct) Pre" j vel 4 p(X'{.<i J
b) '?CNinq ~he.e+.s ! ('('Lin C II)
c) p~ Z. ml n lA.k~ <t- /fcorr,mt'n.dOct(OV1)
d\ etA_tne (I mi nut-e.:J en cmP deLis Ion 1-f/'2<{ /7 'i
e.) f)udol.l(\j (<-{(Dr-I-- oct- [k(, l('tn, Oec(c(ll., 'X(Jt {'n"!
{..') C(~i\tr(tl.-lp 1(J(zu.e::.t -to c.h(tr\qe :OLj ft I fl q:2 '5 DumN
LAl'\ib (d<!.l\iEQ cr/I/(18)
,"'"
,. "
....,. ."
'-'
500 S. GALENA
925 DURANT
COMI3lNED rnOTECT
f
GHOWTH l'vlANAGEMENT .
PLAN SUl3MISSION
,
~.....
...........
:)
"
.
-
,')00 S. Galena
925 Durant
Combi ned Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
GENERAL REVIEW INTEODUCT[ON
Submitted for GMP review as one project this submission con-
sists of development planning on two separate land p;ucels:
The 50n S. Galena [Xlrtion of the project on which (16) free-ma rket
units und (1) employee unit arc plunned; the 925 Durant [Xlrtion
of the project on which (12) low income studio units are planned.
The respective locations of the two project entities are shown on
the Project location m,lf1, following page.
The review criteria denoted in the Growth Management Allotment
Aprlication is basically, and most easily, structured for evalumion
of a rroject proposed for development on a single 1,1I1d p,11'ce1. To
facilitate n:;view emd evaluation of tliis project, which combines
development on two land parcels, we have submitted each develop-
ment com[Xlnent in a se[xnate section of this portfolio. Each of
the two parcels proposed for development have been treated in-
dividually as to their respective compliance with GMP criteria.
The son s. Galena portion is discussed in the first PJrtion of the
submission and the 925 Durant portion in the latter PJrtion.
-~
.."'..... ,.,"",,~
~~dr
~ I ~Ch.. ./.4 -- .
G1:m jt:!ln.'.~ ~:...=- - -
, :,~:tj "U'j t.:::.,., t..:~,l.l1 -. ,- , .
1 ~rt;~. Ut..; ;::.~:::::; t~j L~ ~- -
j r..!.:1 r,l:::.::j r~;::;:l1 ';:4 ..~
'i ~;t.H ,.;:::1 I~::;t:t: ~:;. ::-<<
f1t :~ U::t;i [;::::-, r~'l~::B -
J ~tld' f"l.'H .....::c. .....1~;) .
4U~I; ~.... tt........~ ,.;'t".. ,,-..- -. . 925 D t
.~:j'H;::l. ~:~;2J~:;;::: ~'~' uran
o tiH:U ~!!~ t~;;:;"" (clO:;:;: -', ProJ' 0Ct
'J [~1 f::;l~ II!,~~',\ ~~.;;;::~ _.~,H , ' , ,
!:-:::J..... t1r.o:....... '
'I'li::;':: ;:::::1 <.A S:::;;:: =~ '
iI1~ln~1~ ~~f:;~ ~n~f] --~~--. ~~
i luiIlfll',t1J tiElib~:jH~'''I.=.._ '.,p'!,1;-J
~ . was ('11 -
) fJ- .:Tr. ;n:rrr~ Grn~::. ..(t:n. TT"?"'f"pn.: - --
.;.\ i~~!:~ ::::;::i f}::::2 .::~:::~:::::;;_:_. - - - ~
j,r.;t::';:,;:;::::;:IO:::":-:::l :~::::rlltt1t!hl;- . _ -
JI ~\\[\~ ~i;mjf~):;~ ,i1~r' ,,'
, . '~'~"'''''''' ~. ". ,,,l__tt!l!1tl~~-,.~,~J rjl1J_U1rlllll - ~ :
r;, l?~::.~::~\.~~' "J::>c . --1,) .
. 1 . '/....'....:,.'.1., . (.
. . v" .' .' '.,:
/.~.:....:.:,:-...~,i
.. ;.>~;;.;;':q Y.;"
,- ';". ....'.,\, lor
j,".T,>.\'V","-"Y' ~""".v,..,." 'Y.'~-"" J~' ;
.J',.,./)(~.'\><: ..'y'" \,....,...'1 ~'\....,",.-,.-,,' r~......\"'."',~.'I'
/.'/,.;-:....\ ,\..,X..',. ~.;,.,..../.; :::'~~~:.I j
... ~ . . . . . -\ .. 'v.. ~ . ^) -.-. , M . ..'). ., ,.,' '{1' ':}i:x'.,
:J<:.:'..' .;'\; >\\'.':.:.."> :-:.;':->.>:',") \''<,:,:.:'" -'/1 '-"-\::f.-lc-hO:
/........,.~ ,./.....'.',~, ,/..../.....5 ",..., .'.'...~ Offi' ~j,J.)~ft-'iC.>
;,/....?~,-",/\,. .....-".",....-".^.-;.> :.-..~/.,...-"-"~ >~.'.', ',\' ~ _ )-{,'. "")::..-0
/1'/./'.'.'.\..) /~/,,-~,'~.'v"..-..:.. "(<\//..~.)<..<' t--.,>,'.'..,','\tl -~...
1" '" ...'. X>" ....') .....-,..,.. ",' '. ....' -..jl ( (J>-'l b7
~:;~ ?:.;;.;~.::\$; ~<~~-::;::x:.~ (;:'~';:':;~~'i ~~ g"'P
, ,,'"(' l'lr .... ",^2\.!'>.^/'y ! C
'l~""/7''''::''''I'''''' ~",'\.,\!\...v l ,>t~"'" ~ [,
<~"\'.-"'\'j .....>',~'\'.'<.~ "",,.,,\.V ..",'\:\,'V","'."" '..:",'\
.'." ..".. \. ~ )( '.', " ..\..'\. ~'.'\' ','. .,1.>. ,', .. ','.11 :-<',\"\ \ ~I
. ,.>.....\~ {...... .".:-.. .,......','.'.', ,:,"'.'."\V'; '...." f:\) '>;ly
>:~~.;;:.<<~ ;:;,\<:;.~~..;j C:.:::':.\:~ <:::<..<:::rl'~~\: 11~""')r;J1),tm~l1 ~500 So G"'!c:na
M"~" ,..,/,......",.........,'.,..,,"-..:'\'\ )\'J:.J'i '''x .\ . u.;;:;
,"',,:.' ,', (;:-;~':">:<1 ;:-:....:x .y.:: ::,<(;.:::'.'1: ';',\ 01.1.:: '::;::""'0 PrOj'''''ct
,,'^' , ~0:'~'\""'\"""""""I\"\ .... . ./..., ,-.
... ..... .','" ,'.' '.' >)...,.....,,:. ~>.\ .;...... ..:;..,'.;,...
. ~1 _ ~L.."y\-~'1.^x':;.:>-; tq."'l~x:'\.\.,1 ;\,\,,,,-( .....r:.:..:-!..:::::lv4~'..:,4.- "
?\:c::.~.~ ~~~;-;"~~f'i<\.~':""'~'Jlri::\'-'<i:!i ~,,:. .....:~. 1:"::-::,;:':'''~ ~
{':',. ~,. i:\\.,-';::-<~'<.r:.:""\;">'l V\;~~~- l \.'\\,\ -:.;.:0-,.... ::~.'::'."':-::-
:;":;;:-:'.. ~~.'~ y::.,",{! ifi;':;X"S;] ".;0... ':\ ))\;'~~ ~,:.::.: :'~a:.~,jJbn;;':"~'" :':- -
,;>:'\,;<.'. )<>"....\' ,,' 't<\-:';'.'" ,:'-.\ r "" ;" ...:....::........:.', :.,..n --f)
1 >',.v" y......... .~,1 I,,', ','.',-..:\ l < ',-;', 1'--"" ......: :....,'. ..... "'i . :"- - ,-
'Y;:~ :,.;.>.:<~-;;.;Il.(.>>>:.;:.;.~' f\:.'.t;::j \. Jr,!'\.' ....0 :.:.::::::.:.::::::'.:: .::::: f'':='--- ,..-== '=_:-:-
~>>-"lx;::s"",\V.IL-.,-I...c..,..', ,",.,', li'~)<' , ............ '. ...... ".
,~~?;~~ ~;~~,;;.~~~~{~:";0;i~$.~'Ji~\'~ ~:.t~~~:~!i!:..~.i~?fi;.:..::...}...::::.:.:~:- ~=-,--
<<.:~:..\.\; :<,',>,':.:..\,"l B RUBEY PARIV ;\2'1 '-.,\ 't ,:.'. '.. .. . .: . . . .: : ..... '.' ./
. &..\~~~~ ti~\i~~WAGNER PARK ~J \~ ~1\:':"':':'::-'::':':"':":'::"::<::':":':;:':':'I.,1;/'
~\:\,\/'x ,~I',~;\'\:",:::~a.--:'S}~\,.o;:dJ.iI< \"1 \ ,{ '1"0':::":.: .:-: ::::.".: '.:. : ....
,_ l'=-......T-~"tJ",..I;j."";:q5..Y...b. 'T" ,'.. .::::;:.:.....;:...:..... ,: .....;
_ _,-..-... 4...t>ll ';J;' .. - ,.U'.~' "".'r". .",
=- ::~:~';:Y::r'::\.:>~~:'.:>::..:;::;.t:.... . :'
...... .....-;,:PEf.'!>r:;D.
J~' :'::::-::'~:~;j;.iY ?' ,) _-
;:. /:. .'?r.
~,':.',': ::::
~ ~.~
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
~
'"
JtJ
400
I
800
(jJ2
r--1-.J
o 200
,"""-..
,....' ,
""
"iiI'
500 S. Gnlena
925 Durant
Combined Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
APPROV AL REQUEST
The 1975 Aspen Employee Survey cleady demonstrated that 52%
of the em ployces surveyed had household incomes less than $10,000
per year. This group is mninly comprised of the suppon employee,
a significantly large ,1ml importnnt group to Aspen's economic
structul'e. These employees Iwve been disenfranchised by the un-
availability of adequate housing at a price they can afford.
"
An important aspect of this project is the focus on housing needs for
the low income employee. Of the 29 total units proposed 45%
(13 units) [Ire designed and designated to meet lower income needs.
The merit of the low income housing provided by this project cannot
be measured, only, as [I percentage of total units. Their more
important value in meeting the low income need must consider th{u
quality nnd size of stXlCe (form) is being provided at rental rates
even lower than contemplclted by the Growth Man;Jgement guidelines.
Applying the standnnl used by the Planning Office, i. e. 30% of gmss
income spent on housing, this project crentes housing for 26 em-
ployees (double occupancy per housing unit) with a salary of $4000
per year. The designated unit rent of $175 - $200 per month is
significantly lower than can be justified by normal development
economics.
The unit distribution proposed for this project purposely creates
employee housing remote from the free m:lrket units. The four lot
site, in the I\M F zone, allows the development of larger studio units
(425 s. f. ) with more open s[Jace amenity, thus a higher quality em-
ployee product. Emher than being locnted supportive of a specific
employer, the low-income units may, at this location, address the
employee groups at large.
"
This project offers major and immediate relief for the employee
housing deficit at a locntion within walking diswnce of all employ-
ment, sh0pping, and recreational destinations. If :lpproved by
GMP "V', construction of the low income housing will begin
i,m111ediatcJy and prior to construction of any ree rn;J r .C! unItS;-
W1ich will be phased voluntal)ly.
.
...--
'.......
500 S. Galena
925 Durant
Cambined Praject
Growth Management
Plan Submissian
--.
-
]n view af the urgent need far ]aw income housing such as this
project will immediately provide, we urge that City Council
autharize, far this project, the constructian of ilddition81 em-
ployee units ilS permitted by Sectian 24-1O.]() of Orc!in:ll1ce 48.
(Series af ]977).
,
,
.
/,"
,.,
\
'"
,
r....'..::~
::~~\
;1
~:~:.>.,
r(~:
l~
""""l l,~:'
) "
- - - - -..~: j
-_/ '......~..
,
iJ
..i
(;2 T;~C~i"~?) :~: ;~)
v: -.L ~~. . ~'-"'~
lJ t.L ~~li Ii
,,~ '<:'..
'.~ ~
((:<'::1
'","-', \
\'~~;'/::-J
,-
-
"~<'0. "" f" ..-,:,.,
h~~ /,.p, 1: ~i
1--'( L:--' , \~ " l '~'-:J . !
\.:~~-:i~.>~".\ Ll~=-:3 t-b-,:;'~ ~ I
:-:'~;j/?~::::-: ',:m
;'..~~:_-;.1~1 U
~': r1
1,,\ "~"V':"'~,lF-i'o ~,' '~""",'" !~'''';'''7>" ...........
,".' , ""l~ ;~r~ , ",~""',' t: t.,~, .
11 I.' ... .",~'~.. ... '~"""';:;' .'J ",_-;;.~.! ... ., '-0.,.;;"
u
;-(10':::;"'1 -I:-"'-~r:'
"";''':\~'.,t.' ~!
. . '. ,
, ., ~,
'';d ~
r;
.,
.
~, .::~
~i t.'~
500 S, Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Submitted to:
Applicant:
Architect:
-
-
City of Aspen Planning Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
Mr. Hans Cantrup
P. O. I30x 388
Aspen, Colorado
Copland flagman Yaw Ltd
210 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
'.
,....
1,.",
-
,-",
,
~'~l
J:S I
~i' i
..1 ,
~~ I'
-i:J
::}' I
(})i
('j" I
a:, i
C! !
fi) i
"t\ l
", I
...... I
tel I
::1 ,
i
,
)
..-
(
1
,
I
I
i
!
/
,....
''''
..
/"
500 S. C<llenn Project,
Crowth Mnnngement
Plnn Submission
lNTHODUCTORY
1. Project Name:
2. Location:
3. Pn rcel Size:
4. Current Zoning District:
S. Zoning which Applicntion
is filed under:
"
6. Maximum l3uildout under
Current Zoning:
7. Total Number of Units
Proposed and Bedroom Mix:
8. Size of Units:
,
9. Price Range for Sale or
Rent:
/
'"
~,-.II
500 S. Calena Project
500 South Cnlena Street
City of Aspen
21,600 Sq. Ft.
L-2 Zone, City of Aspen
(RMF permitted use)
L-2 Zone using J\MF
Option
21 studio units
or
16 one-bedroom units and
1 studio unit
17 units toni!, comprised of
(16) one-bedroom free market
units nnd (1) stud io employee
unit
(a) one-bedroom free mnrket
units @ 1000-1200 s. f. ench
(b) studio employee unit @
600 s. f.
(a) one-bedroom condominium
units sold nt current market
price
(b) studio employee unit (mannger)
rented at $]75 per month
..........
"'""
....,I
"'"
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
10, Program Na rrativc:
The site is planned to maximize open space, landscap,,"'Cl at the
public corner of the parcel and to pennit the functional organi-
zation of two basic building groups comprised of (16) free market
units, in a massing configuration compatible with neighborhood
scale and pedestri:m movement.
Consistant with open space objectives the majority of required
parking is designed for a subgradc location. This additionally
permits weather free movement fWIl1 vehicle to individual unit.
Buildings arc designed in a two level stacked configuration with
inclividualunit plans canted :It 300 to permit solar and view
orientation up the mountain and to further reduce the massing
by the staggered building form.
The a rchitceture of the buildings is characterized by sloped
roofs stepped in relation to grade change, the use of native
stone, cedar siding, exposed wood beam exterior clements and
projecting balcony eleme11ls.
The site will be completely 1,ll1dscaped to create privacy and to
cre8te a corner green slx1Ce rc18ting to pedestri:lI1 mc)yement.
The floor area r8tio permitted by zoning for this project is FAR
1:101', 21,600 s. f. of building development. As designed, the
total project uses approximately 18,500 s. f., or 85% of the allov..ed
FAR.
11. Description of Surrounlling Zoning and Land Uses
As shown on the Vicinity M:lp,
Galena Street in the L-2 zone.
the project is located at 500 South
Surrounding zoning is L-2.
Surrounding lanel uses arc ::1 mix of lodges, commerciul facilities,
multi -family and single -family units. Immediately sUlTounding
complexes are the Tippler Inn & Lodge, Continental Inn, Alpcnblick
Inn, ancl DU1'8llt Condominiums.
r~-,,,,:"'''''''-'''''''''~-''''''-~'nA'' X~'-7<""""--'-"""-"";Y~"".'-'~ .~ ~-:>- --"'.'-'-~-"~T"'"____'.___"-'~~;~.~r'
,,'-
,..."..~~....~.".,-..--~",:--,-.,..,.
r~---'--_."
_"~:';:"--'L_._;._ _ _"",,","---.,_~
-_....;........":............"...~~
'..---';-"-,-~",,,-<~,,
'~,:"';"',',,,,,,,",,.~..:-',,.,,..:..~...:...-,,,,....;....'~
:....""~,--......-..."...~-,-
I
J
~IIC'~I\.l~Y 8l(MAlhl ?T.-----(~.
EXDT1\~!7 MAUS---
l UFT I.A--~
1
1
l
J
1
j
1
GALfl-l^. STREEI
---MILL '5T'nET
,
~~ W1ME11.IAL COT
~ WlI1ER::W. UT.hf.
o u;r&E l
Uill] K[5<PcfITW.-/?,LOC(jt
~~ F,KK!F1JeUC
Vicinity Map
~
o XX) .00
1
000
~
~~--
;~--~' -....~'...-~-c<.,^.,-,-~..':;:~~;J".~ "', --->"'r~~"1"';",",?""'~-~~:."""",,~:~___,,:",,~, "':~";:-''''''~''~'''''''~'''_',,- ,.,
'-".:~,'
".l;'.'
.rl,
.,,;:
l:,'I-;';-,
"",""'.' "/\i, i:_"_'
_"~',_,,,",,_C,,"~._;,._j...,'h
,
.........._-"'-'<..._.+._,-.."'-_.""-.~.<.. ..~.-'-~ .-..~ .."',,",,-; ........,
.............,._..,.~_.'"'-.,."..-
............ .'-~~~;,.:::.:..~~~'" .~_,,~i
"'''7:t',rr'!''''''-:''''~':''~'''''''--''''~'- "'<"~'~~""'."""'''--''7 -",..."",-.".,..,:.~... ~.-,,,,,,- -'-""''''''~''~-,~:''''''~''~-~-'<''.'~'T'''.,.~~~,.,-,,,-.,-:-._; ".
,.~............,......--......
. ",-" .', ,..--""'.. " ..' -- :"-""'" "." . --. . "
.j:.::~~~;;;......"::,;,,~,,"_~,~,,.:.......:.._....~~~~~,d.i..~..;.;...;.;.>>:..~:._'i.!.:.-ii..~:"...J....;,.'i...-. ~;..",. .......;...:..~....~:.J.:..t.L...;:.~t.;:_....:...l.4"r.....'L..~;..:,2...... ~-d"';;.lii......._i---'~._.:_.:.,...:
~ fJ..'O( 5J^11OH ~
,ruPNlT AVm'E~L__83__..J I L-____~_,__!~ WJfl'
<<"- ~""'~:!I~~!I':WU' '~1~"'&" ,......-lI~~ =a)
! i~ _ I ,\~UU"-'~IIIGlll' 't ',. '.=_
-- - \-"" ."Il
' .0;...." I r ' I,~#
'1 ~.."''',... m""''''~~~'''..~~'''''''''~'' III (_' /' , ,.,.".. UT1l..C f-eLL
~'~~r-~1~f ......~. ""en D
If ""1= " j
l I ~,,- ,-: -
II I (f ~~
" '. ,"'" It,' ':opj"1~ &.\V
; .. ii' <> "',
"-,- 'Ill 8 ~~
g.c
Tlm~l>1~
j
1
1
,
1 ALf'E~ rua,--
I
1
1 rDmffiHU7 ILX
"
STEEl' 5U<'CS
r;urniT =
,
/
11 Site Context r'2'~
f~;-E~-"",-',"~~c'~"\~-JC<:1=-''''~'l~'''''''~''''l':;':'z-.."".,;,:~"""",~"""~.'-~:f""-"'"".~-.. 1'"......,.... _~.....?'""'''''!:'''~,.....,~',..",._lO'''....,.~
'l .',;! '.!."JT'~; ,.,' ::'i,:<,, " ,
',; ,.', ,.....~:_... ._..",.:/'":"..;,._.;,.~~..;.,;;~:~~,;,,,,~,~~,,,,,,,,,,v&..,<~L~';;';~.....__ ,_.' ~ .";'.:..;. ~",,,",~...~.;...-ii~
_~c_. .. _~__
@
-
~
r-"--~....,.~"...
.:',' " ", -,
-..._<:_,_ ,.._'....."'"'~""._ ...-;>__ ..'~_~...;'~_"'..,....._.~.... ,...~- ._.:~...,.n"'"
_~--,,~ ~~..'.--:_';'.....,........u ".,~.__.""".__~--::""'.".,."
'-,
.....J'
,_.
I
I
i
I
I
,J
I !~:".,,"'
...;~~..........._--'--'''"~.:~__,'~;.:..i.;;,.&~................___".,~;..;....::,_
t
I
,
NORTH OF N[lL
.-....~'~J-..~ --~'~~'~.,.~~'
_.r: 1
010' :,'
1,1 :.
u ...J :,./ L..
_.~._.____.~L_
,. -" ','
-':.~J_,~"''''''"''''~'''--'''''''''
1
---I
,
,
_..___________----------- I
\
1
I
J
I ~ Lr- _.__
l~J-U~l~~"~/' ~;/~~~:;l~,~.
./' .>-'.~" i'I -If :\)
, / ~///-?~,,). J / __'f"
I ~_I /y..';{" '\~ ,J 'I'!
I ..-< ,. - ~ 1" ,,'....'~ -v' : 11
I ('\,;-' -(,.,\ r) ; ~ i'
I ~ ft"-:;?'" ~" \ ~ - -, :"'1 .
i ,. f;-!/0fC'..>c:0i/1\'/'j =,~ 1
I ' "t/, _ '- ~ _/i III .
! ! ~;;{Xi -= r;:)1~lr l~--
.-, - '. I \:1I't,;','i ,,',.,'~~' i
.____-' I "i"-.' .\.:.J.' ~j-/~" --..,.;
I 1 .t. . ,'<J.__...,_. "
'--': \ ";~. '::;;'-' i '
: ~(;'-. :"\, -- l.:j /''''-.~''I-- ;
1 .~ ?~~I~~;} -r,-', ;~/ fZU'f: j'
I "",' " " -;' 'h ' .' ""," "
: I- ~.~ ~.>.t~,.1',::::~,',jf();,j,\~~ :,~..~~,<>~..__ ,....... .f
I ~ .~ ')'1 \{ .,_'''_'1-. ,_",~,'"~",-,,,~":-"...-l , ...
I ~ >~~.,,~~'>>'~T--'--'~'~~'-':;:;
:, : ~~ ~J~fV):rj"", I~J0IJ,{
~ t:!; ~~;'.;</~/f."'J~N-4'.Jf ~;> 0
..J f~\\\l";;:h /\.: y,/ .
'" r~,: ":I,' \\",,>,,;..;,,,>:f,""v' ",>-'i.:\<..{1 '
o ." "1\\ ;2-\"\\J'.\\\\,...' ...,.",,~...<:, .."/ ~
vi 't'< ~";:}.~(..,,, \'...\:~'I-\~,~~\>-~,:.\,~/,.,.\(;.../
., :':',:1;1' ' 0
Vi
'.1
'-~L,
-I
J
,
,
,
i
i
,
,
EJ,
,
,
l,
I
I
li
J
,j
I
DEAN AVENUE
COIHINENTAL INH
'~
~ (-]
- _r-;-1
--L ~
,
i
I'
11
11
II
I;
"
I ~
!
Ii
!I
ti
n
I:
Il
I
j
1
II
,
,
!
~
1
.!
:1
'.
.~
/
]
SITE
PLAN
(.:.:;)
~;;7
-
r-~- I
o 10 20 40 60
I -~\ j
i ,-- 1'\ \
,..,---.r.......-:<'" ..............--,.-, -""""'~. ~"l'"~.-.-.,--~.....-- -", .r...........,.......,~__..'..~.....--.<<-""7""""~ ___->(.""-~.---;:--"""".....~..T"'::--=-.....---,___ ~
l " . ' , .. .. .
..._.~...........-----.._ ""'"...._...__._"'_~......,_w__.....-...~~ .j._.,-"--'--,,~_.,.'"-....=.~~............._~ '.~'
'/,'..';
1
~
j
~.i:_.:.k~,;.~:::...",-:j
,
- -)
. -_....~--~--_.~
_~.:~ i~._
..-
,"",,"'"
RAMP TO
PARKING
BELOW
\
...-
.....-
...-
.....-
/
/
/
/
/
r /
/ '~/
/
/
I..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:...._---,
.....___1
I
I
,
/
l
-/
I
I
(
I
,
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 l-
I IJ.J
I UJ
I cx:
I l-
I CJ)
1- <t
Z
LU
..J
<l:
(;}
cri
~-
<^'
Unit Plan
500 S. GALENA ST. PROJECT
~~
o 10 20 40 80
I
I
,
-"""^,,
./' ,
,
'\
" /..~
- -~, recycling_
Gli~enter
"
'-'-7
',)
,
/
"
y'
''y'
'\,/ I'
\ '>/ J)-.......
,)' ,~........
y:
,
,
I ~------
,
,
i
I
)i~~--' I
'~ l~r~derground
:/ Parking
,
I' ---~.__._"
(.: 10 Cars
./, ,----
,I
SUrfacc-
,
I --.-.
Parki ng
i -
II', 7~,---_
Cars
\ ----
~
~
" fl V)
\) '/
" v.,
.
~
., I
Q I
3
,~
J
1
:~
IJ
!'j
~---~
.-
W
LU
a:
I-
(f)
<3:
2::
UJ
-!
<t
<:)
, elevator
//
/
\
, \l;
,/
, "
1 '
1 \'
" \,
,
-~
/
I
,
.
'" >;
"Ii)
~l-j
C i\I //
/
/
\ ./
'-_./
Underground Parking Plan
500 S.GALENA ST. PROJECT
A
~!V
r-\.-.J~~~
o 10 20 40 80
'~':;-':~"'-;""""""~~"'''''''':;"''._''~'=-'''~''"''''':''''-"'''''''''''- ,,~,_v"""""_i_':_":',,~'''''''''''''''~_'''''~''':'':':'''''';'-'''''''''''';-C'7~'?'''~'t'''''--'\-'''--''''',;,:,~,....v ~.~.'r--'
.......,-""
.,~C~. ""~-~~~'.:::~.,~~';~\l.'~"~~'_:_="c'~"C"C_-
" d_\ '. l.FL~~
;'e
Is, :r; ~~~)~~~~
'. ''1",'' ?,"!""JH",-:-;"<",, L
:' 0 .. ". \..- ~. 'l. . 1 f~ '
I' -~; 1.~,Ji? _1.~I,t\l'h-~
'l-r",'J.t3/IJ r ", ,,1,',..[,. li-",
; . t:' .~."~"'\ .t".' ... ' '1'.- p"-
lie[ t'" " ~,u_' lj
:i ]',1 ~~
,-,..\11-6
'~,.. ~._'~~ -~-~ i.;
\:O~'.O:F),.tt,.~~,,::,p:<~ t
f'r..."", ,,'
'- \'/':r-' <':~' ~> .I
I"r ''''''''
-'~,itt\ .>g
~b'~"'\"7~\""""'f.i
, ; lL../J:!oI':?f'.'; ':"3:t \'.~
. ~ '!i~ ':" "..~.., 5:~
i . I 1'" i:1 ,~. ._,~~
: l,,~... .\,-; __ '; ~:
~ r...... j'\:Li ,':./' '~",
I b; ~';~:I "il~;". JH
I j! ii;-i .'..)~
) -n'} '~
'c h ,/,' I/c''''t..t
::~. , '\ g' t:l .,' - ~.'
1l7'I"'ii\r1i~','"'I.j
Jt1" I r:'H
Ili~11*1TJ~
![l]~" r'j "~I"t'~~-~l~~,;.
~ . .1, _:' -'1.1
..I ,,: .,J~
~- i
\ --i
" ,~
. i
r J
~'~c.=--
\ '1
/'~ \
,i
1
o
r
~
-~
"-..~
~=
~
.~,
~
~i"'l}.THidOU-d
I-
UJ
III
a:
r'
(j)
<(
Z
UJ
...J
<(
(;J
I
,1
11
II
'\
L
1\
\1
!\
lJ
j1
I)
'I
I-
'1
II
I.
11
"
L
11
\1
"
I'
il
[I
II
\1
Ii
I'
il
,.
u
(I
"
II
Ii
f
I
~1
[1
[I
'1
:r:
I-
:J
o
(j)
"'
~
o
0:
u.
z
o
f=
(;)
UJ
(j)
'--
z
o
~
>
UJ
...J
UJ
,
"
J,
ARCH ITECTURAL
J
\~
~ _:. 0 ~ 10 20 40 I
~ I .J H
t...-....~r<'"~.,-,__"~..!';7-:,.,.'__:'r:-:~.;1".-:-,;ry,..----. "'..~.~..:::_' :~..~ ,> ~,~,,_. ....,._.. ~...,............",..,,- .......~~,..,'~.""....,.."""~.. --- .J
" "",',,'_;' :r:,,<,c,' .... H,<".,: ,...' '.,,"" '7'-"-'''--1
. '..~ " '. - - -.'"'' .'. '.~. .... ~
,~~__< ".,__'"..,~~:._".~ :..<~.-:., ~,,,,_~,,~'>.'~~'<~"'~:___"'~__."ii,,,,",~,.......,<.._~_J .
"...
.......'....
/-...."
~"
'. .J'.
.
""
~'.-....
'-~
'" j
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Mcuwgement
Plan Submission
PUBLIC SElWICES
(aa) Water System
The eV[lluation is the capacity of the public warer system to pm-
vide for the needs of the proposed development without treatment
plJnt or other facility upgrading beyond those provided by the
develope I:.
The project water demand is directly related to the fixture unit
count, consisting of 300 F. U., which converts to 80 G1'I\1 maxi-
mum probable current ASI IHE guide stilndards. The 6" C. I. P.
water main located in Galena Street, 8djacent to the pl'Oject site,
will provide good flow and pressu re to the project development.
A project review by 1\11'. James i\1arkalunus indicates that no fore-
seeable deficiencies exist with reg,1 I'd to In'oviding water service
at adequate pressure levels ,md no substantivc impact on the tn~8t-
ment plant, which is currently Ulili/,ed at approxim8tely 75%
e8pacity, will result from the project development.
l\efcrence
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Project review letter from M r. James]. M81'k8lunus,
Aspen Willer Depanllll:nt, this section
(bb) Sewer System
The evalu,ltion is the capacity of the publ ic se\V8ge dis[Xlsal system
to serve the proposed development without system e.xtensions and
withou~ tre8tment plan Up2;l'<lding,
The project site is served by an existing 8" sewer line in serviceable
condition extending up S. Galena Street and located directly adjacent
to the project site.
".....
'"......
/"
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Applying the Colorado Swte Department of Health standard of
IOO/gal. /day /person to p1'oject occupancy sl<lndards of 1. 5 per-
sons pcr one-bedroom unit and I. 2S persons pcr studio unit, lhe
total project would gcner~lte only 2600 gallons per day. This
would add less than ]/7 of one percent to the pLlnt C<l[XlCity, thus
is well within the service capa bility of the present cap<lcity.
A preliminary project ['eview by M1'. lIeiko Kuhn indicates that
no foreseea ble deficiencies exist with rcga rd to provicling sewage
service to this project <lnd no subsl<lntive imp'1Ct on the treatment
pl<lnt, which is curremly utilized at approximately 75% c<lp<lcily,
will result from this project development.
Reference
A. Site COI1l,-'xt Map, this section
B. Project review letter fmm 1\11'. Beiko Kuhn, District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation Dis[>'ict, this section
(cc) Stonn Drainage
The evaluation is the capacity of dra inage facil itic;s to adequately
dis[nsc of surface runoff without public drainage system expansion.
The drain'lge control system for this project will collect and retain
all sile runoff and interrupted subsurface flow with on-site drainage
facilities, The project shall have a seric.s of dry wells ane! retention
wells sufficiently sized to, retain and disperse site su dace ane! roof
waler runoff. Consistant with ,;ullldard engineering pr<lctice, the
e!rywe"tls will have overflow outlets extending to S. Galenn Street.
A pl<lnted diversion berm will Ix; created at the uphill side of the
project to diven excessive surface drainage away from building
devclopn1Cnt thM would result from :lL)J]clI:maJ precipitation.
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program section
.
......,
...."
500 S, (;;lJcn:l Project
Growth Miln:igemcnt
Plan Submission
(dd) 1"i re ProtccLion
The evaluation is the ability of the Fire Dep'lrtment to provide
fire response to the project ilceoniing to the established response
sUlnclanls.
The project site is located :lpproximately 1,,00 L. F. (4 city blocks)
from tile fire st'lrion and can expect Cl m:iximulll resrx>Ilse rime of
minUles from alert siren to equipment arrival at sire fire location.
Tile project devcluPllwnr will provide an on - site fi re hyd rant which,
in ,H1LlHjon to serving thif' project, will upgrade the protection
system for the immediate lwighborilood.
The building development will be :idelitioni1l1y protected by a elry
standpipe system, completely sprinklcrcc! parking garage and
ionic sllloke detcction in inc1i\'idu:il units.
^ project review by 1\1 r. Willard Clapper indicated no forescea,ble
defici encies exi sl with regard to fj rc protection,
l1.cferellce:
^. Projecr Vicinity Map, this section
B. Site Plan, Physical Desitin ilncl Program section
C. Project review letter by Mr. Willard C. Clapper,
Chief,i\spen Volunteer Fire Department
(ee) Pax.!:}ng Desigt.l
,
The evaluation is the design of requi red parking with respect to
visual impact, exposed paving, cOI1\'cnience and safety.
The majority of tlIe required clll-site parking (1 ,;pacc per unit =0
]7 spaces) has bcenlocated in an undcrgroundlxuking stnlcrure
belcJ\'! the resiclcntiill units. The p:lrking structure ,\'i11 provide
for 10 of the rcqui red spaces and the remaining 7 spaces will be
provided ;15 surface pClrking SC1'ecned by landscaped earth berms.
^ll parking has illlmedi<1te and level pedestrian decess to the pro-
ject c1ev'llor as well as ilecess stair,.,
.-
'-"
" eo'
.500 S. Calcna Pruject
Growth Mnnagement
Plan Subm i ssion
- Reference
A. Site l'lilll; Physical Design and Program Section
B. Parking Plan; 111ysical Design and Program Section
(ff) Homls
-111C evaluation is the cnpacity of existing roads to service
project generated tJ:affic without substantiolly overlooding or
altering existing traffic patterns.
As shown on the Site Context Dri1\l'ing, thi s seclion, the pro-
ject is located on Galenn Strect npproximatcly one block south
of Durant A venue.
Examination of the tr:lffic impact of thc project is primorily
based on work generated by tlw Uiv'tTJ\ t::nnsportation study and
on recent conversations with M 1'. Steve Lockwood, Alan M.
Voorhees 8; ;\ssoc., Inc., tr:lf[ic consultant for the UIv'lTA stuely.
The table below presents the trip type and trip frequencies per
day per unit for a project unit as estimatecl by M1'. Lockwood.
The 6.5 trips per unit is less than the 10.0 trips per unit for a
typical residentiill unit, because the project consists of one-
bedroolll units generating less people than larger apartment or
condominium units. Total trips arc estimated between automobile
and non-alllomobile trips.
Trip Type
Estimatcd
(}nc-W8Y Trips
Estimated
Non-Automobile
Trip Perccntoge
Estimated Non-
Automobile Tri P,
Skiing/
Recrcation*
,
.75
60%
Work
2.00
7507
/0
Shopping and
Entcrtainmcnt
1. 2S
75%
Personol Business
1. 00
SO%
Other
1. SO
25%
6.50
60% average
.5
1.S
.9
. S
.4
3.8
.--
"
'--,/
,
(
\,~
'500 S. Gnlcna Project
Growth Mnnagcment
Plan Submission
*The ()()% non-automobile aVer[lge for recreation trips assumes
approximatey 75%-80% of ski trips are non-automobile but only
50-557<', of summer recreation trips ilrc non-automobile.
Due to the project's immediately convenient locarion to downtown
Aspen, Lirtle Nell Lift and Rubey Park ski buses, it is estimated
a high percentnge (60% to 75%) of skiing, work, shopping and
entenninment trips will be non-auLomobiJe trips.
,
As shown, [Xltentially 60% of the total projected trips per unit
will be non-mIt.omobile tl'ips. The estimated 2.8 automobile
onc-way trips per uay arc equivalent to a resident's using his
car on iln averilgc of ilpproximarcly one time [X;r day. The
walking and public translX)rtation convenience of the project's
location plus the project's low resident population results in
minimal trilffic imp:lct cl'eated by the project.
Current detail traffic counts arc not ilvailablc for the area to
quantitatively estimate traffic imjxlCL
F.derence:
A. Site Context Map, this section
" '
(gg) Energy
The evaluation is ability of the project, its slxlCCS and users, to
maximize the conservation of energy.
Consistant with the solar,geography of the site, all project con-
struction will be designee! and built to m8ximize solar utilization
ane! to minimize heat Joss, thus reducing the demand placed on
the fcissil fuel resource for space heating. The following techniques
will be implemented in this project.
Insulation
Significantly exceeding regulatory thermal standards, exterior
walls will be insulmed to 11.=26 to 28 min. ; roof composites to
1\=42; floor composite to 1<.=20, foundation perimeters to E=14.
,......
'-'
:)
,I
500 S. Galena Project
Growrh Management
Plan Submission
Architectural
Architectural design configures buildings to optimize thermal
characteristics of the projeCT. Exterior wall exposure is mini-
mized by staggered unit concept (common wall), and by vertical
space oq~anization (minimum ratio of exterior surfaces per sq. ft.
of occupied space). All buildings arc oriented with highest use
interior spaces to the south to achieve view while maximizing
passive solor heating potential.
Glazed openings on non-south exposures will be limited to
Uniform I3uilding Code minimums (to comply with ventilation re-
quirements). Opening surround details will be required to mini-
mize heat loss due to infiltrotion.
Partial flat roof surfaces 0 re designel! for all units to retain the
additional im;ul:Jtion value of snowfall layers.
Devices
Consistant wi.th solar geography of site, solar collectors will be
urilizec1 for domestic hot water healing. Electric energy will be
designated for primary space heating to reduce fossil fuel demand.
(approximately 50% of electric power' used in Asp~n area is hydro-
generated). l\utomaLic thermostuts will be specified to control
night time space tempenttllres. Fire place desisn will use double
damper control, exterior combustion air, glazc'd fire opening,
and heat return ducting. ] lumidification will be used to reduce
temperature rcquired to achieve equal comfort levels.
,
Reference:
A. Architectural Drawings; Physical Design and Program Section
,......,.......-,.~~.~......,._ ~_, ~.-<'\'...,.'7.:-....... "~<""'_';-.-: ',. ...-.,...,.".-... ....,"._~..~._."..A~"""-.'l-- ~,-,...,.~:-..-,:->. r__....;'" "~,_>:<:"",,..,~:-..-.C':>"
_-:""'''':--:--rr.-"r~~''''.''.Jc'
r" --,~ ,-.., ,'-..- ,__..e,
t .
_ '..i.,_'-o.--._~..'_......_.~_..;, .,-"~.,,_:
, ,
~;","",,-."""''''_'' V._"_"n_'.C~...__"# _;.
......~..~.._...;..._.'- ""--'" ~ ...Ji,~;;"......~~"...~ ~._"A'_~''''' ..~'--._. _......
i
FIRE 5fAflON
/;';ClICE 5f,,1'1<.+1
H1C'HWWBl.!t1AJl-J sr.--"r:;.....~;, I Y.":i..""'-.,._;.~~.,,~.:n.~':o../ti-t"TZ'..z:.-:'lo~~'
". I)~ .'''. .. '. tV?> '.'\ y..~o.'." ") ....,., "...,
j:';..>:ii L fr, f; ~ g~~:~>~
fi "." '-",-, ",'" ,,'" ,"'"...' "" -- -I
l"",~::,., ....: t '.~. ''''~ ::."'. ',^. ,:(:'
I . "/. ~'... .-, , ~ . . ~
!;'./'.~...~'.~:f ;',:j'..~,;,~ "()..\'....v~' __
;j E'lf.)TI~o- t1,\LL'";.------~-~- ~.U-\.L;>J:;). V ."'\-y--o<.l '".':"; ':'.,,~ l\"..,......, '\. ~ - ~
~ Us.. '-{'I:'" ,.' ~"."~,,.;.~;:......,,;:~
I, \-.lA&NIJ: flf.K- I' 'r- ~ ~ '\ ...., .'?' '~. " \( ;".. ~'.~
I-J ~ ;:$ ~ ! ~. Cl . ?\,::.. ..., I" >>
I )1 1.-:;' ~'-'-'-J .{,.,......., ~,",.v^.., _ __~\~~~~~
1 n~f.T"';.K 5V-T1[.t,j----~~ ,(~~~~J".';"""7-,..,.~?t.\'~.,'\.::~ ;-:::v.":'~:~ ;:-T~"/"'.'.,p' ---.
I j;i"''' ,', I,i.~<., :JQ' . .'~ '-..^ ',' ;....... . -: U
' ~"';~-,~), ~IT~:';~ '''ri'' ';'~:'. ~ ~ ..~, <. ':: ~...>: ~>.')
1 t~, '1/:.- ':.~~'J~.\c,._~_ JL:=r_~:....'- ~~~_~~(~_~__tlJl"J.ur ME.t-LlE.
~l M wJre ~_._~~. --;;~/l,\~ -r:-:;;-,1-;:~---"--'--"
I \'"' /~;.. J"l:" ~'I 'i,
<<'ifIR{"2P;~"'f~'::C'0~ "~~ aw-<;:~,"6itl~.\}t"'l-c"'AR, ,~ -- --~-L{1\'....E ~fLL lire!
~"1~o5 I. 'K. J /-, f~ ~'\"'-.
'" : ~/~ ..ti;: '~"'\s,
I1i1WWL ""'? LWc'-~-.' :-:71' ,,' 1 .' >; 11: u"l
,',' 'I ' I"'" ,,8, '3 %/1
1 t~~"'I";.:..'l .~~<{:q~:~,~~ (.J
ll,i un I.A-----=~\~:~'If~J[tl:ii)J(~' ..;------0=
1 \ ~ 11~~r \ .--:--~----rmJE.:T :.m.
'1 {!JJY~ - - .-------GALfW. Sir:fET
I \ ----- -----I1ILL 5i>2ET
1 ..,
1
1
'1
~
1
I
! Kcc{:;ffITVL.I5>'li'C0E.
1111 Wi:! "'/0= ~~ .',
l Vicinity Map o,.x> "'0 ~
"
.t~ ~..c-f<"'T:--:"l"~--:rc." ~,- .".~ ~_:""~''''''''.'';'.'r'''''''''."''.,::,,,:.:-.''.'''''<-,,:,".-::-'''':'':'''''.. "'-""-"~"": . :.;.c:'...,........ -:'...,.:.....-.~-,-,-....,.,.~--.,~-~~';::--.---...~~'~~.':""""'---",.......~.'-:~'-.
~,
,
f-'
>.
1-
I
"
!'-
H
f
I
,
i
L
~
;'
I
rrD:T\:':: D C.\T( Tr'..J.JL
,
;
.
f-
!
i
;
I
1.
r:>\\',~-~
r~~~
~
L'J
mnn
W1!1rrLIAL c.cr-E
CLl1nf:1W>L UX.(;[
,LC%t l
~31
L~... _""_."_:'_,,,~._.~.~~,, ,~~~-,.,.~~~._~. --".~".
',; "'I,..~.,'j~'
,.~......."'''';'' __....~_~ ~~._.;._.~,.-.<."""'-i..~;;.....;.:.:...._:.;,...~_-._
"
r.".,...'-._.,~-,..._-.,.,.,.__.."'" -.'" _..,"-,....:..,........ - ..
t,~,",,-~,.~ ...n....... ,_" .----...'....,....k:,~___.......".._~.,.".....~.:..__,_._.._ ..;..,....,,,...~,. ..- ......_.~.,_
i
I .
"~"'~_"_""""""""_"', '",,~. ~_''''''''''''I"''-,-'""",":-.~..,__.~,.,~",_..,..,,"T"'''_
,." ......_. _._.-" ~,_,,__;, ,.~ ..>. .,..........>..........:....-'<. ;-.......:. <_4....'""'.....;.,'.;..,~,;.....:.:....-~~;..., ._......".
i
t..
I'
/'
/
I
I
j
I
I
'j I1ffYf}J:Y, SlA11"'....--,.,....-~
!1 !.liPNIT AiE!-l.lc'" -J~._:~-=-;,'r~'.l:~.::--=_..) JIl:., ,.._-.:-,-~----=--J L'L'~, =
I (~-","~""""C"'_"_':l':O==.;;:;a(..~;t;O~::='::""""",;,g.~"""(__",=.u::.::.:_=~-'-_==..~~",,,,,,~)
':jl HIU'AHr "--'-''''JI> ~G:l1fr3{\1-='=lJ'II'!I'I:i ",,;;~~~:;O-"'=J"- (~'€'~;~J ;:u;~
[ L . I~ "..,...______,.___,_,..~.c .."..~
~ --~---~----._----.- I '~\~~7,lla"..g,\; --/.1
I \'\'~~ __,~ "'~I - '-..:,j.
j {tl'r,J!j~fll'/1.~ ~~:I"':;..ta~:f5;~~~f'r~~uu~lr'a:'!t.'1111 f I ~> "~#I
I -- '. ~~.~.z..lI>==~J~1 ! ;-.' ~"~ II""" limE ICElL !'''J
i f"RlWO.W CflYWL,- t.._,_ i IP,,~;I'" ",,,<) (
jl \ ~/ _ _ J ,"- ", ,
~. r- -,-'- '\..
'I;' [J ri' /j A,. ~:::;;;:n,.,. '" '.
II 'If )"11 li I .. '" ", - - --. 1 1 neE I~"
~--= I Iii ~1/1 r>~~~1 ~s~-~' -----~1lr1li LO.R
l'f7-":'j r~''':~~ /'111 (;2 j ,dO .,':./ ~
AUrJl E{JeK }j,:'li..lu' I.{ ~".,~~ ~ ...... / ~ "-
L~~N-i'l 1/,,1 0 0 ,~ .- -.--"nE~ 9,[n~,
I ~- ,L 11---,1 '~
J ~nH% l/Y~ ------- "--"",,,,111) 8- ~______n,_~_ -PJ>~Hf cmw;
I Er
1
l
'1
j
,
I
"
I,
I
I'
I.'
i
Ii
I
I.
i:
i
,
t'
i.
,
):
I'
i
;;
,
;'
i..
r;
i
i. ~
i;
,
i.
i".
,.
"
i;
i"
i",,'
~' ..
,
,
io
I,
,
~ ,
I;
"
"
i!
H
i1
~ ;
H
"
t",
!!
n
~ :
;..;
1
1
'..
ii
H
ii
:
L
Site Context
r--"._ ______J
o 20'J 400 flO')
r.::~)
\~.//'
Ii
i!
ri
!:
....-..!
,
,
.~ -""" '~""~""""'c:"-~'f' .-,.,..... .'" -"'--''!7'"': -'-'~""'-"-' ~.-""....,' "",-"~""""'-.-.~ -",,- ......n,.",..- ',F',"7"<'-'-~' '.
--"':~':."'-"':--.........~,~.-~-,..,..-~-~ ..,.....,....,..., ....,""'....
:'-7;> ',;'1;;:
"':.<:, "'\!~<. :_,',,~.
-D', ,', - ,:,~'~-~:;':! .
L'~",__..._..'..~'..'n_..c,....~,_..,,_,~ ..
',_,~.: ,.,...~<~,_"".'....",_,~ '..".......... c. ..;.....-....;..:.'cc.. .._ ...._.
J
.-."............, ,:--"......,..:.~.~..'",:;.- ,.:~-.:~~:.'.."-~:>~.;,.,, ..'...;-. ..~
Asr'"N SANITATION DIST"""CT
~. . '
r. o. Bo:1. ,~lK
Tell,. 925~3hOl
^SI~Ei,. COLORADO HHd 1
January 30, 1978
Mr. Larry YaIV
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P. O. Box 2736
Aspen, Color"do 81611
RE: PROPOSED SOD SOUTH GALENA PROJECT
Dear /1". Val":
I have revicIVed the above referenc~d project with regard to the quality
of se,"er service to the proposed bui Iding development. I understand the
project to consist of (16) one-bedroom condominium units and (1) studio
employee unit.
The project is pl-psently served by an 811 sewer 1 irle in serviceable con-
dition, extending up South Galena Street adjacent to the projcct site,
The present sewer plant capacity is 2.0 million gallons per day (M.G.D.),
,"hich is presently util ized at approxomately 1,569 M.G.D" or 75% of
capacity. A new addition to the plant in 1980 wi 11 increase plant capa-
ci ty by an addi tional 1.0 M.G.D.
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of 100 gall dayl
person to project occup.Jncy Slt1nJarcls of 1.5 persons per one-bedroom uni t
and 1.25 persons per studio unit, the total project would generate less
than 2600 gallons per day. Thi sIVould add less than 1/7 of one percent
to the uti lilation of present cdpacity.
Due to the uncertainty of the total number of proposed units and their
locations under the GrO\./th ~~C1rV19Cl1lcnt Plan, the total impact of the
approved units on the collection sewer lines can not be evaluated until
such time as the informi:1tion for all projects under the Grov/th Management
Plan is available.
There presently exists sufficient plant capacity to treat the proposed
proj ect,
If there are any questions, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
,.J<--L !~-
He i ko Kuhn
District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District
.
~'-
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
;
I
4
I
;
I
I
,
I
I
j
i
1
,
I
1
i
I
I
I
\
\
\,
~-.,
"',
I
I
(n 1
01
(:ii
rD' i
,_. I
"Tl I
tn' i
() I
.,," , I
::;~: 1
(ii'l
i" I
."
no 1
r ,oj I'
1..<1.
(,)
..') ,
i
:,L~-'
t" ,;
I'l
(;)
,
/
,..~,
.-r"
,",,'/
500 S. Cakna Project
Growth Management
Pl:ln Subm i ssion
SOCIAL FACILITIES AND SI.:lWICES
(aa) !,ubl ic Tr,msIX)rL~lt.!on
The cV:lluation is the ability of the project to be serviced by
public transponotiOll.
As shown on the Vicinity Map, this section, the pl'ojecr is loc:lted
350 feet from the lAn'ant Avenue bus route and the Rubey Park
Transir Stenion. These distances equare to a l} minute walking
distEll1ce, thus casily accessible.
Reference
A, Project Vieiniry Map; lhi~; secrion
B. Site Plan; Physical Design ,md Program Section
(bb) Pol ice Prorection
The evaluarion is the ability of the Police Depanmenr to pro"ic]c
normal protection services to the project wirli current personnel
and equi pmcnl.
Conversations with Aspen Pol ice Depa rtmcnt rxcrsonnel indicJte
the average response time to this pl.'ojeC't would be 1-] l minutes
and tlli1t thi s proj eet would not extend prcscnt patrol routes. No
additional police personcl will he requirccl to provide normal
protective services to the project.
,
The project is I:x:HJI1deu on two sides by public roadways thus
faciliwting access ,mu ViSU,ll control from patrol vehicles,
Additionally, a priv:lte security p:ltrol sCTvice will be retained
on a continuing lX1Sis to provide normal protective services thus
reducing. the frequency necessary for public IX)liee patrol.
Reference
A. Site Plan: Physical Design and Program Section
.
"
, ,
500 S. Galena Pl'Ojcct
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(cc) Child CiHC Facilities
---------
The evaluation is the provi;;iun of a child care fclCiJity within
rhe Projcct.
A child care facility will be provided for this project.
Space reCjui rements will conform to the I'A inimu1l1 Hules and
I\egulations for Child Care Centers - Colorado State Department
of SOCiill Services.
In addition to interior space and outdex,r play area provided for
the project gener::!ted children (ages 1-8), the chilct care facility
will be LI rge cnough to abf;orb certain of the needs of the im-
meeliate neigll1nrhood.
Ms. Terry J'~nd, Director of the Aspen 1\10ntessori School, will
serve as consultant to this clement of the project.
(dd) Bicycle/Pedestrian Paths
The evaluation is the location of the project re18tivc to pedestrian
and bicycle path systems.
The project is located} block (120 ft. ) from the proposed City
bike and pedestrian trail and approximately 450 ft. to tile Galena
Street pedestrian mall. As shown on the Site Vicinity 1vlap, this
section, these systems arc within easy pedestrian access of the
Proj ec l. .
Additionally connecting to the City sidwalk system, the Project
development will provide sidewulks Jlong the S. Galena Street
perimeter of [he site,
Reference
A. Sitc Vicinity Map; [his section
B. Site 1'1 an; Physical Design and Program Section
t.:"
.....",..
"
"
:-iOO S. C~lcn,l I'.:::jcct
Growth I\1,H1~gcl11cnt
Plan Submission
(ee) RecX5:]iT1G_~~cjlitie,,-
"111e evaluation is the provision of 1'crUSC reeyc] in~ facilities in
the project development.
Such facilities will be provided in the park g~ ]'~ge portion of the
project, conveniently accessible to IXJth OCClqXlIlts and pick up
of the scpo rated refuse by t he recycle center vehicle.
Consisl~nt with the recommclIlL!tion of 1\1 r. Denni s 1101mes of
the City !kcycling Center the Project will hCl\'e separClte containers
for glass, tin, aluminum, ~nd nCWS!XlpCrS in a loc<ltion ~cccssiblc
to a pa rked 5 ton flatbed truck, 20 feet long.
(ff) Design Fentures for the I1nndic~pp(~~
"
,
The evalUCltion is the ability of the (mject to ~cco[:nmoc1atc s~fe,
cOllveniellt movement for Iwnclicappcd persons,
The site ond building deo:ign will permit unobstructed movement
(for a wheel chilir confined pen;on) f!'Om ~ny location in the
coverecllxE'king garage to vi rtu~lly every condominium unit.
This is accomplished by me~ns of hydr:lUlic elevator and path
surf:lCes which will not exceed 0 slope of 1:]:5 (U. B. C. requirement).
Reference
^. Site Phlll; PhysiC:ll De:cign and Pn)gr~rn Section
B. Flcx1r Plon; Physi cll J)",sign ,lnd Pmgrom Section
(gg) ~roxim!y 1.0_ COI~2m('~cial SUl?Po I.t. F,<lCiJi~ics
The evaluatioll is convcni,'nt wolking distance from the project
to commercial support focilitics.
r
-,
"...,
....',;r"
...,.."
,~'
500 S. Galena Project
Growth Managcmcnt
Plan Submission
This project is located '~block from the C-C Zonc and approxi-
motely 450 fcet (ll minutes walking distance) from the Galena
, Street Mall, thus arc casily accessible pedestrian destinations
from the project.
Reference
A. Site Vicinity Map; this section
,"
--
.....
'-"
-
suo S. Galena Project.
Growth M,magement
Plan Submissioll
EMPLOYEE [lOUSING
The evaluation is the l)Crcem;lge of low income housing units
provided by the developmellt.
45% of the total project units arc designated as low income
housing.
For detailed infonl1ation on the employee housing prorX)sal [or
this project see th", Social Facilities and Scrvices Section; 925
DLirant project submission, following.
,
/
~-,.,..... ~~_.--:-....,~....,. '-'-"::;':."~'''-:'-- .~
.'1-,.,...,.-......".._.-t";,....";'"'..::~ ';:-' .... _...,...___~'.___~~~~e',..._..;:'':_~.....-....- ...
,-
........,' ........~....~.__'-~.'_~'^-.". ~~.;..,...............~ '_""-""-''',,,-'k-''' .____,. ~._'---'."_____-_
I
~.
.. ....~....;:.,._'" :->-"" .:.....;i..~.....;..;_.,~..._.~,.,~.:..:::;>- ".-.....,-,.~-,.~-
/
rVlr:E S1AnCf.l
/lrG'iCE. 5TATIc;J
H'<6!-l\J-W 81jI1....!q ST.----- -(~~._,,<:;:J'TI ;', ;:';l'~.:::;::'5~_:D1~~-..r:~~~~ rm-o.!:r#~':JI"~
" r';:,~'~ ~:::,2<~ E::~:{c;:l ~':;,;~':J I :"
UtJlll-Kr 11AL1-'-' - - --
I W...fY f\t:K 5r^nrA-J-----~- - --
, "r,..;,'" :y." "co ,', '..;\ ,; ",,'" , , ..
j n_ "~",-~.I-"" n . \~-~ ____H..:::r.-...;:::_-:":lH.j--""..""',...(.:'+-- ~---DJN\.J-n t.\E.~Ut:.
; M fNI1: -- ---~- T ,~;;:7~11~:D'-;1i::;~~n'_.~
1 \) ~~1:~~~j~~.':I~~1~~~~~ , ~:~~~I: ~.7.. ~~32(i)1.>o I S~?)". -----unu m_LL UFT
1 I, r:"\I" ,~" "Jr,(fj '\'>(~
; rt:lfF..JHv.L r-L"':> lCOf'_______.....stjiL:.:J.:: ::. .::: ::..~~~~-? !:.... .:),1/ Bt: -B"
I ..: ..' j. . '.' ,:'. ,// I>' '~!" "0 V(';'
, " ':"1" 'I: "11-1' ~ is "8,
I, ~lJ).~ . . ':.: . .: \..:-:~{{rn;~~) ,tg cJ.---~rrDfO':cD CITY T~J'JL
: ,~ ;'\, I ' ' : " "t ';'V""'~ E,"
\ IJFTI,A---------~n\'\,lC~:,},::'~,j)P</ \:e../_____
I w""~ c~'k)..'," \),-'11'11 \
1 \~~ I~JJ \ \ ------.--.-rrOJFLT YTE
1 -1llJJ\ ~- , -- --- _n -------G,\LE;!A 5P;EI'T
I \ \....- ..-------MILL snUT
v
,
tl
1
IillT:S] W~M:S[>IAL em:
~~ (LMM:r;!:tAL lPLX;E.
[""]ID,":, l
HlllTI K~:WctlTi'l'I,,'LC[;0[
PCA"''', 'f"V I'
r.:i{~,~'~l m::K/ ,; ~ _ u
/
Vicinity Map
~ --
, ~
o :too 41)()
,
'"
~~
j
i
.~."'--r"'~._~" -':'_~"","",,-"'-
,___._.. ~_.....,....__, H""~''''
._-~.'~ -~-~---'., ~,..,~_.,~~.,.- ""~.-'''--''''''''''~-,-' '._-'-
._[~ ...~ ---.-"
.'~ -j, "':"
'. ','. ':'. ;.~... ,'.
_ _,,,'-",- ."",_:"..___.~'_."'___'u_.'-.~'. _"'_"_~""""~"__'__ "".,-_,.._"-",,,,-,'-
~.~~L~_~,_~"",....
~.. ...<.".~.......,..,-'-",,,;---"';';.: ..... ,,- '.."":"..",' '" ,...",'- "'-'-'
"'-, "''--~'~'-~'~'"'''~'':''' ^ ...........-c-r- "':
......,-.,. .,.-:'"""'".....,-.~ '--'~""'1"""''''''''''''''''''''''''-' 'r'_",_ """:"""-
p."'., '-~."
~~";-T-__-,..' '... --r~-""""",~
~~,
-,- --- --'"'_'."'-'-~-"-~
...~',- ~~
~~~- ~...- -
:., --~.
I
, -~...-
~.~,-;.~---.... .
I
,
i
I
"
'1
,
j
I
I . -- ....." , ---li.e:;'
1 'm",,"~ ",", Jill.. . __ ~__""
'jR\J:..._, Il -"~"-=~~i-"''--'~~>l r-- '.
' /AJfAl1f AiUUE- ...N,~ .~, '~~",' =', <>=.= -~~t-r=;:- ,..,=,~~~,___",. "'~-~',:""J --""0" cr-, ' ,I-h, L
I (--"C_~~---IIWP--'-- - -~~'<fJ'
i IltUW,'f -'--';0,,1-'- r, '''r, '~F, "tn j I" Ii'" ' t!J,}',
I I,.J '-, LI , "__ _ _ L ,I
l' ~n::-;rll_l'; : ~_;,.";,.,._.",.,,
U .icJ"_ ",. _'" "'1 unL, H:LL-
1 -.,- _'_"_ "", I.., "" ,
' . --. . . ,,""1 " "C- ......
~'~~~V1[":"'''J'.,:~~="=j, ~J ~iV:7L, ~_~_"""..
m_~"" '" ,.\-_ !'l/L._. ~,
I I I r fjj ~;;;l~n~ ,=.
L_J Ir.rJJifr~_ ~
r"""'~,,'.r:T:=i~ II (; "".'. =.
ALFE~ WCK-- - (~~~J (, :"i '1:"']- .~ 'i i ^" tl" "'-"'. ------.-n-----ST~: Wt;o,;
f1f' V 8.., _ PJI.
.- ~-=I_-~- II]e i.~. -.'-:1 ~, '" .. ',', '-~.._..
i rVfH'TW, w., Lm" /,
,
!
I
r
i'
I,
I
I
I
i
I
!
!
I
,
,
,""",,,-.-
i
i
j
I
1
1
j
I'
I
I,
I
i
I
I
,
i
i
I
I
i
I:
I
l
l
I
!
!
f
[
f.
I
I
"
,
Site Context
r- ....--J 400
, "'"
,
'00
/'';\
~ I:
~ :
.-.~~-.-,;-.~
-"~.."--~..<.-~....,
'-..~....,..-""..-.,-~",--,..,
li,~._.....,..'''~ "-".
. . .~ . > '_': l ',' i
r
I __.. '_,_.~.._
L ' .. ._, ....._..,__...'_,
. ..:_.-...._.~---,
.---,',-'-..,.,..--,-
--~'~-_''"''',~.'''-~-~""'__~_ '--r....--
~-
,'/'.,-
...
, .. " ,.' :.~'
;-'--<0.'-
~',.-,,-~..-----
"'- - " ---"'-~.
\
,
I
"
Fj2'."" ,
I':;", "
~J ~; u
~~?:,
r, $0<""
~~l'/J
~'"
~ J,~E;H; ;~
[i'~t.7 :::}l ~ '~/~: ~:~::;~:~~(\ '::~~:]
" n
,1,"'\ ~: ~:~ ~ ~~:'.~ ~,,: (,,'-,'.,i,''','' ,- :.ri
to' .::":..,;.:.:.-,."..," ,
~': ,:... tr:"~i'~"
',,'\/ L1J cl
[;~:'):1~\
~::~';""_i1
i_I
i-1
~
n
C.::)._....
H.!
!It"
,-
-
92S DUI,:,<,~:!:",PI'ojcct
.....
,-'
/
Cl'Owrh M:IJl:lgelllent
Plan Sulnniso;ion
Submirred to:
City of Aspen Planning Dep:1rtment
130 South Cillena Street
ASpCIJ, Colorado
Applicant:
M1'. lJ:lIls Cant nip
P. O. l),,'}x 388
Aspen, Colorado
A rchi teet:
CopLmd IIJgman Yaw Ltd
210 S:,uth Cillena Street
l\spcn, Colorado
i
.
., -".
---,
'~
~ -
500 S. G81ena
925 Durant
Comhined Projcct
C rowth M [lIlagcIll el1t
, Pl8n Su hili ission
GENEll.M _ !,EVlEW INTIl.ODUCTION
Submittecl for Crvll' review 8S one project this submission con-
sists of development pl[lnning on two sClxu-ntc l8ncl pnl'Cds:
The 500 S. G8kn~1 portion of the pl'Ojcct on which (16) free-
markctunits-iiil,r(l) employee unit arc pl8l1lwd; the 925 Duranl:
portion of the project on which (12) low income studio units 31:'e
pl8nnell.
The respective loc8t:ions o[ the two proj eet enLities are shown on
the Project location Ill8P, following poge.
The review criteria denoted in the Growth l\13n:lgemel1t Allotment
Applieatioll is b:1Sic:llly, nnclmost easily, structured [or evlau:l-
Lion o[ [I project prornsed [or devcIopmelll on n single- l8nd iX1J'ccl.
To facilitate review and cvaluation o[ this project, which combines
development on two land p8rccls, we have submitt:ed each devcIop-
ment cOIllponent in a sep~lI':lte scction of this portfolio. Eaeh of
the two parcels proposcd for devclopmcl1t have been treated in-
dividually as to their respective compliance with C;,'AI' criteri:l.
Thc SUO S. C3Icnn porrion is discusscd in the first ponion of the
submission and the 925 Duralll pOI'Lion in this IXlr!:ion.
(
....~.
~
!
.....;.'"
.......
'1':1
....1."
(<'<
..__iI
((~
..n."
05
-~
::-j
.~'''>''' i
''''.1 ,
'1; !
:~~'" i
\cc."~ 1
01 I
fr
~.) I
CJ 1
(t) i
(fi l
to I
~:) \
i
J
)
''''''',
--
'''''
-
925 Durant I'roj eel
Growth Management
Plan Submis~;jon
10, !'rogram Na rr:1ti vc:.
The site plnn is org:lIli zcd to c rc~ate maximum open space fronting on
the public (Dun1nt Ave.) siclv of the project clevelopmenl and to permit
the sU1ggerccl al-chitecturnl form which l"cLltcs to the residential scale
characlcri zing the majorily of stnlCtu res in the immedi:Jte neighb,)rhoocl.
Thc building is org:mized in :1 2-1evcl st:lcking :lI:rnngement wilh in-
divlclu:11unit pl:1118 st<1ggerecl to permit multiple view orientMion and to
further reduce building sCillc.
Consistant: with convenience and vis1l81 objeClives the required on-site
parking is locnlcd to thc alley side of the building immediately adj8cent
to covered p:nhs and access stairs to thc inclividualunits.
Utilizing conrcmporary form s and components, the a rchitecture of the
building ilccomplishcs ;1 victori:lll scale in its facade clements, Masonry
beilring walls, wood siding, and projectin~ b:llcony clements chi1 racterize
the e:-:lerior design of the building.
The site will bc Lmdscnped to create [~ITenslx1ce nnd privncy for the
lowcr kvd units.
The F. A. n. permitted by zoning is 1:1 or, 12,OOU sq. ft. for this site.
The project del'cloplllent, compl'lsed of 7000 sq. fr. in [Oral, use,; only
60% of the permilled Door :1 IT,).
The building (oolpl'int o[ 3300 s. L covers only 277{, oflhe available
land pilrcel.
\
11. Su rro1ln~li\lg Zoni 11.12: ,me] LlIld Uses
,
As shown on the Vicinity 1\1:lp, the project is located on Duront Avcnue,
east of Orinin81 Street:.
The project ,ll1d the immccliatc cnvirons are zom:cl RMF.
r'
"
/-....
" "
~--..,
~. .
92S r~mll1t ~'rujcct
Growth tvlanogcmcnt
Plan Submi S,iion
Surrounding Joncl uses are lodges. condominiums. apartment units
and assorted Single-family residenti,]l units. Building complexes
in the immedi:nc surrounds ore: The Alpina JJ<llIS Lodge; Silverglow
Apts,; Chateau Snow Lodge; Olclllunclrecl Condominiums; and The
Vaga IX1ncl'j "oclge.
/
/'
(~I .,ff~
'.. 11\ /:c~-:.:j~
~'::'f'i 0-j'~"" A("'::~':
/' , t::lj:!h.~... . ~~t!'lt~
II,..C.III."" 1=,1"'"""
: ':L~:f:..~ t:~:;:::.-'t~:~t~:~
I j I:!: ;~1 :; i i':~ t::::: ::~ \'::::j':;::
[I , t I ,. ~' ... , - .... ... . ." ....
! . '''1 .. "I' t ~"...... ,....,.....
d I\~\f:.\~ ~1:l~1 \:;::,:~ [.\I~m~:~ ,.~,.>' -~ 9~~Oj'~UC' ~ant
() i:::til~;i:'l ",,,.. ...,. - " '"
It:'::: ::.;;~ l:i',,'t;:::::::::: ,-c.::""- ,
1 r:::-S ~.::::l [ Jr",:::;.';>"
..' ,.... 1
1 ". . J ...pH I I' .
11[::::: ::"---', ;, "_,,i:":::;: .
"'" . ,.." ,..""," :::''':C:, -c;v
i,~J. / ~~~l. :! f[;li~lijHW 'l:t\TI~~ ~~i/~n ,~~--'- cP
w:;/, VC'IM~,,, ,(,.oJ" , , ,11" 1.,..J ~,..:,,)-, ,t,. -"''-'c'-. ' yr
- - . -- " (f .- ell"~ -r f.i~-:~~ t:~~~~: ~-.:~~t!:.~~~,r~I-~~1~:~::~]~~~.~ - -a
, ';{ )t~!\~1;",;.,1r::ljl.fQ~t I1W'
. 0:-:(o,r::~--<-.";: , ~:3!.;~<._:<DtllJlll ~'1..t~l (~ <r'\ 03J
(("C",,' L__,. =-_1. =:_-::::;.;::JC./~: ~..:..,-.::,() , . _ q '1:", fl/
~ '(, ' . ' ,'~ '(> <;I' ~
I ,'.':>":-:":-:n ')i'
j r ~', ,"'.'.";'1'
I V-.....' "<J'.." I
L "",I '''Tn ~:::,:'::':-~p"
~f,tf;V'P UL L~:; >}:~:;::,:;,,~,~!:
I - . . ."..-^........x .v'"'v~. c.n.. ..~~ j
I ,..,__ - ~.~ -, -~-.. --- .---- ---.--l, ;;> !/V~O y!.'-"
~. i~'PP".", ,v<p ""'''''~ ,,,,,vpl'I' I "
4 >.'-':::'J"J'.:.>.~ <",::::":,,,<,,;::~ ~.;.:<<-; /~) ~.: . >:....:'~'\J "lX} f'
J ,.... /. \.':x .., ." ...J'...... '--" ,'",. ,,' I' tti'{Jj
~ >:-::::"">~ >.':': :.>>:~ ~;;'>?'.":;.<) ;::: :'::'':'';:;'1 -, f{)~ ~~(;::;[~l4~'j::R-V(:~ j
'j<'" .",' c;>,'-:,:-:-:,/ ',','. ,',. ,) ," ' ',' 0\-:,,' -, ',' (,'1
1 ~:-:>:::->:;; ....'/."'..'>:. ~/X.\;,: :).:,:;1 ~~~::'~ :::.~:\ ('1')) ~d"""~V
<!J'/......' ;:;.;<,:\.;.:) /....,...'\." ,/,'" /'vl' '0 ),~.
///.......)0. '-,," ,/"" :-...,.......,.J' v.' ,,','- ." '\ Ii'"
j:..{:./;.A:...\\'x :<.:,;-<<'Y--x ~,',<'^>(>>>,X; ;-:"<'J':;~>S:~fl jl~ "
nV',"-1V~~') ~""0::--""j rv)<~~"'>^" "~"'V,..,...I, ::Z:"l''::J ~'~
.f',....,'.. \~"-' ,...,'''-~' . .. J ", x
1,..--:.",'.-:.":.-:. y',,,", . . ',-1 ~'. \. ,-,<.'.:<'" < :.:< '...,,"-:'.;, ~,\.\. y~r-) .'
"<,""','~">)'" \.1' ,.- ,J.-\.l ~ S
<::<:.,<::::\ <. ",' .:~>'<~1 ~>>:':':,,;:~ ~,>:,:, ',::;:r '1~\.'\\'~'~:N"(C5D,S~\:t ,/ ....-:~500 O. Galema
1 ,\>' ,\ ",." ,),> / ' " . " ,',.",..' :::::" 8 .'/",/(,h. \0'>' #" P . T..
;. " ','t~ ') ,....,., . ,.... ..:.'....'..,,'x .-"...'......,..:;1 , '\. I : .~. ." ~'.' : 4..........~. ro"~c"\-
,.' .', <1" //"",,", '. ...../.',...... . """, 'I'" '......, ......--:>:.., J'-' .
1(,."""\'" ..:-- '. .''':'.\.-:-., ~\...x'..,.,.,,' :','.':'.':',\.:' ,"',\::9\...: ..........:.".,..... '::.:.
1/"" .~ \)".,,---....'\ ,)'.,,"\.',''--,\;.-'',....'.\ 0'''&..:............(:',-:.....-~~
2s.:....'\....<', -f-Jr . <X>'>"'J'v'.\~ l;'~'('--'l\.;-'6 > ~.~ :"/,;.; ,'';,',''-.'' :. :1'.... -- --,:. ...... :. ~
. L_,"~" l' 'j-l~ l . . .' .
'I ~~.: :,. :':-;, ;':Y0'"':-''' f)":';:':"""{'l { "<'.'n,j\. ,11:>,\' ;~~:':';"'., (::','.:. ::: .:,::'., -',,"
.>.' ,'.', ">-." ,\.\.\.\ (v.'. .'0',',) ,?:,\~A" \1 ~,,\. f...,\...~:.}';--...'-...- '::.......:.......:. - ~~L
~ :s.'.' ',r~' >>~"<,' ,/'.:...,:..'<<.111 "". ) ?")"":-:"; \':':;; :;.)-)-, "'J:l'[F11cn";~... .." ""'===
>:.,,:-:.~ >t >-x.\,' -....'" 'd 't ,"'<.:-..';...:< , l (,,\ ( <<\ ():A:', . . .:: '. '.::: ;::', ':,"J : :.: ~--.~ - ~~
?"", " x",-""<,:,, i/....."\".~) \ ",y.'."" ..,... ' 'J ,.n.. .--- -J}-'
",,,,,\.'.,,,<,,{"\, :"':--"J',",\.,~l v.,'.....,.,\;{ (,'-. It''-', ".I'" ..: ..... ....:......1....
1/>..,,\'.,"'~--.....,,\.,'~\J'('."x'\'.;,").IJ'l:X'\:' If'I' "'~)':'" :........ ......., ....-~--- -----
I,' ,,'>..... ...":'''' ,/ .,.,..... .:.\~::, ~~/y~)'l. .\',: (,<.~ ,'nrO j ,\ ,d..):....:....:::::...:,.: .:'~ ; ':.'-~ - - - -
l~~~~:: ~>: :~:X~\~'1\? :__-:~::~1~:-';:,:~ ,.,~:h~'~'0d \. \.....~-{;~.~~.. mlil' Y\r{,(~i'" t. . ~ . '-'~-- ---- -~-
')X:>" .'\.\-"j. ......>.'\..^..:,,'0::.).~ \ ";)}~,,>-~trJ ~~;:'li\~ _J. ..." ~(.):"'" .:. .1.1..... I . ~,.',u. '" ..-:.~~ -II
l J' ,..>\.:.:'/''1 ",..;.:..'->,':.. _.,:,,1 ,,~J'- t, ,-Y ) ,.'t\] , ' \. (\.5..:-". .... .' " . . . .': : ::'" .,: '.'B q ../
1 ;';",V.',<, <, '\ ,',",:,.' ~. RUlJEY P,\R1(/ ::<~, 'f '\1,::1".'.,:"..,.'....... .... . :. ':1'2.:.,,?Y
:,.:-...:-,',.... ;.",>< ').; :.:-....,'. '.';1 ;:, ~: J~..... , (~...',:,:" .... :'t: ..' :. ..:.... ....:7:
~'X':'0:"~'~ ~>:-;;:,:".~"." ,,,'WAGNER P{,hK 'i"" ','- \~),:::' ,:,.': . . '. .' ;'. .' " : . :- ':..'
x"",'. "I'<',\"A""'1~,J - C ','r '.....'-^:.,.......... ...,...........
. . "-., '," ." . " '. - \ I,)(.,d. <;J Y u' J-:) r< ) , Q-)' '. . .,. '. . . " .
h^.^A.....\\:X>, x'\.",v..'\~\-') I--'\.. .~(,.Y-T\J.""'(?'-) \. ,1",\ (.;:.) 1'4- ,,,,~J"'" " " :.... '::'..:.' .., ~.. '. . .
_.......v-~ ....-;}......._...--.-.".-.....,. -- ..,'_:.;.-- '-1, -\-: ,,, ~""i'""""""""''''',,,'' J
-~---' ,-"' ~.~.._.~ ~--'- -~ ~,.~) .. ~
(~01:CrJ. :.:.::'>,::'i.r:~a&n., C~A'
(~~ 0/
/
/
.--"',
~/
-.-Jt
----
1
,)
~
PRO,JECT
LOC!~T!O~J
/'1'-
.,OlJ
\\flAP'
r~____J
o 200 400 GOO
.
I"'''..'' ,-.... v''', '... ,. " ,,--
~'-~\'_~_~ ."...._. '. .__.~.",<...p._^..,..., ,.._,....~ _ _....__. .."...~,,--:~_;v.._~'._ ."~,.~<>-",--...,~ _,,,,'''_~'r-''._ ,..-.~.-.-
,'''''' .,...... ....,c___ ....~.;i.1;.../d.; //"'/1 ::'~_:''''''J'
1,~_,.___.___==-~/:~~1~'~~:{~{~:'J-3::::~
I
1
1
1
1
[0 ~:~J,E:-l
L~mmo~:] L
[]
L-~(1
[~-r -
i-r
L-~-1-l
['---1
-+
'[-'''-'-1' "
-----
lu~[-- .
c:.~ _
C,J.
-~I
Silo Plan 1
925 DURANT AVE. PROJECT -~
\Lc__::~-=:_- ..__~D._ '. ,,_,__[ _.' ~~=L
'r~' 1;_. '-';'." i " :-.... <<'.'-, ';', 'I~,':' - ~':~_;-:>I-'_'-."--'
l
~
!
1
~
I
I
j
"
i
i
I
i
i
j
1
1
,
J
I
I
1
1
1
,l__
WEST END ST.
',- /
1-_---"'1
__,__1
\-L
r'" ,
L I
-llLl",-1-:J~':, .
[-----'~.. , - ',',\',-,"~'~"'~"'."".~<""II.
\1 """,,-.Ii" . 1"<"'". ~~ ;;/:'
L>nfk'''') . (1\~ ~ I ". J \) 1-.
.i lollMCi yj"'''' L>, ' "';"-" h ,.~
) '\'''1'''1 ,..., '{'Ir
I I -..l,.} '. ~ I i-.</ .....,1 :,''1 .:
:-r'T' ,"11 .. , .' .' '.... I'
~--~Iill".. ,... '-.' )")'f" I.
, 1 '..'.<Ii ;''-1 1 :"[
'~. ,. ,,~, .,'
. ..___._. :~. ',. J... .'" i . 1, ".,' I '''I I,
-- , ---~..Y'. 'F? "'-{.::<>.;:; :~1
1------'1' \, --'. ,..L ,I \ '\:J:'< '.1
l I,",~"",, . ""',,' .,:,11 ;,1,; 1,':. ,',
(.~"'G' I ,.:, "vi., "'1' .. ..,~v\ ' I
r I"Y;:"'",)." ,: {"I:'-i
! ----...-" ''-. ~'><', '. ., I"" " I
, \./"".""".J',":,l "',',::. '.: i\1
1"""-1' : I I '" ,> j" : , "," i",'
-.. i : (:;,()'-~~'.'<l-.._,,_..,-; .~:. .'.1 :',,:
..~-:.:-~_.:,--I._ _...".---'-,_. . . :1<-'. 1-.\
I ! - --~__---_-_-~_3- J"~'l !
, I
\
I r-'
l___rI
'-- _.--
~,___......r
r-J'
[-"-
"".".l~~'~_~~~~~~~~--".. -,.,.
,
.1
I)
I
"
--._-~..,
!
\
(.
I
I
I
,
r
.
I:
"
I".
l
I'
t',
t
p
L
LO
~
t:
~
a:
=)
o
i
I:i
n
,;__ ...-......'__... ,'_..~_.1_'....... ____..~ __ .'.,,",~,~ ''''''''..'*'......... _.....".,._.~~.~......:."_..->.. ',~~.,~. ~ _..__............_.--.~:.., ... .~.".;;....;.,....:..~..;~...... -'~"< __....:......__..~-"'-.J
. ""'~." .'. ."..,.,,,-,...-., ,",,~,---,----""':'''--.''''. ,,><,-~,_,,"~,'-'-"".-""
~,,",-,,,,,,,-",,,,-,----,""""'-""'-"
r"""'"
,
I
II
I
1
j
\
,
I
1
1
,j
1
j
1
j
,
,
i
I
I
i
I
j
j
I
j
I
.
I
I
I
,
11
1
i
,
~-,.,...,."'---..~. --..
i
I
I
l,_._~,..
..
,.-.".-.----
~---_._---
..
\
I
i
H
I'
.~ n' n-rl
, ,--'" "'''T' 'I
I ... l .~ ,...1, :'.
, ",.,.(. \) >',
,,' .. " _.l.
11' I '.
I ''':I.\i
Jj . ,;
--,["" ;
r., ' '\
r,c'l I.
i r '
i j,
'.IF
j'''
J,1
r '-~
~Ct;,;, ,1,;,
~ "'.,~, ::.;:,1i,;
J' I,}f::,\ \
"', I'
'1\':- j j
.ii' ':.l
.H ~ l;
i~
I;
"i
i
1 "
1-- J'.' \..' .,
.1--__'~;_'~ '.~.;-,-~.~ :!..,-:l.,
L
I .
! '
'.':;:..
,- ----.,.~.-.~, -...,.,-:---." ,~--"",--_..........-,.......".,
1.';- .
--,,'--T.--r"~'.(''''''''' ...-..-."'....;. .,-...-.
01;..-
'~_,,~_'_,_.A"":'_'__:';'J~~"",",,_ ~,'_.._ .,;....;~.;. .-....-:.;....;...~,-~-.:........~_.--------- -~............,,~.....,...,...
_..,.----.-.-."-..-.,"<:...........'".-"'.",.-~......"..,.._,..-.-.~
._...-"-'-'-,'i...~-'-'"..--"_...~.. "
r
....
0:
o
Z
I
Z
o
~
>
"J
.J
W
r
o
....
lU
Y-
U}
~
ARCHITECTU RAL
~
o 6 10 20
,
,'..."......,
_-.., "..'~.:-..r.,._'._.~'_ ~~ ._._,....,........--.-_;O:.~.
j-. "(-'
Ii
f;
I'
1'\
P
l!
l.
i'
,1
I:
"
"
"
ii
\J
L
I
l'
i'
.'
1"\
i!
t"
n
p:
U
t~
,
I:
\:
!
L
I
I
I
r
r
\
[,
i:
,i
L
t,
Ii
I
.0
'-i
I
I,
I,
t;
I
.. -" .;..~"~...,.~""'~_.--.. ,.~...... =-.', ...;~._,.- --._.-~.~. ."",",,,",
f!{~
<."J
()
""'.~
~--.
Ie
\
~~-',
(:,j 1
i
I
I
j
I
1
)
.'
!
,
,
,
!
,
,.>',~"
...""
.....~,/
"--.,.."
92.'i Dur:ll1tl'roject
Growth Man;lgement
FJ:ln Submission
PUR] ,Ie SLmVICES
-~------~~
(,\;1) Wnter SY..:c;t~
The eva]untiol1 is the UII'];lci! Y of the public wilter system tel provide
for the needs or the pnJp(lscdckvclopmelll without t nCiHl11cl1l p];1I1t or
other facility upgn)(]ing beyolHlthose provided by the dcvclopeL
The projeCl w;lter dcm'lI1d is din~ctly rel,l[ecl to the rixllll'C unit count,
consisting or] 4,1 F, U" whicl\ converts to 55 Cl'M m,lxilT1um probilble
flow (1}" Winer service) or ilpproximately ]O() g:i1, /cl:ly/pcrson as peL'
current ASI mE guide sta ncli-ll-c1s, Tile project il; prcscnil y served by n
6" water m,lin 10c:lted in Dur,1I1t lIVe" ndjilcent to tile project site;
which wi]] provide good flow <It mlcqui1te pre,;sure to tile pl'Oposed
development.
A project revic\v by I'dr. J:Hnc,' tv1:iralul1us ilKlicntcs that no fore-
seeable dcfjcjcncjc~~ exist \vith regard to providing \vatcr ~;crvicc tll:
m1cquDtc pressure levels ;lI1d no ,;ubA:lntive in'IJ:1C1 on the treatmenr
pJ:lnt, which is currently utilized at :lppnlXim:lLely 75% c;llx1City, wi11
rcsult from the project developmcnt.
Fcfe rcnee
A, Site ConlCxt Map, this sectiol1
n. Project review ]cuer from I\ir, James J. M,nkaJlll111S,
Aspen Welter Dcp:lrtmel1t, this sl,ction
(bb) Sewer Sx.~tcm
The ev,1111ation is the ccl[J:1eity of the public sew;ige dispOSed system
to serve the Pt-oposed development without system extensions ane!
without tJ'C:ltment plant llpgl'ilcling.
The project site is '3ervcd by :1n existing 8" sewer line in serviceable
conditioll extendin1', along Durant Ave. and loc3ted directly adjacent to
the proj ect site.
l
,,,,""<<"
"'"
,..J
,"",;
92~"ptlt:il\lr J)~.'2!ec~
Growth Mill1ilgcmcnt
Plan Subnlissioll
Applying the Colorado Stille Li"IXlrtmcnt of Ilci'l]rh st:ll1c1,lrd of
IOO/g:ll. /ILly/person to projeCl OCCUIXII1CY stand:ll-ds of 2.0 IXTsons
per studio unit, the toti'll pmjen would gel1enlte ollly 2,100 gJllons
per dill'. This lI'otJ1d ,ldelle,;,; thJn 1/7 of one percent to the plJllt
capacity, thus is well within the service c!p:Jbility of the pncsent
ei'lpi'lcity,
A prcliminnry project neview by Me lleiko Kuhn inclicntes that no
foreseeable deficiencies exist with rcgilnl to providing sewage
service 10 this l'Jl'oject :Im! no subsUlIItivc imp:1Ct Oil the treJtment
p!Jnt, which is cUtTently utilized at Jrproxinwtely 7S'/!., capilcity,
will result from this project (kvclopmcm.
Hcference
A, SiTe Context f\bp, this section
B. Project review lettCl' from Mr. IJciko Kuhn, Di,;tTicr l\1Jnnger,
ASDl:n Sanit:ltion District, this scct ion
(cc) ~.onn Drainagl~_
The eV8lu3tion is the G1[xlcity of drclin8gc facilitic,; to nc!equatcly
dispose of ,;urfcJec, runoff without public drainage system expclIlsion.
The dr8inagc control system for this project will collect :lnd ITti1in
811 site, runoff i1nd intcITUjxcd sub~3urf~lec flow with on"site drnimlge
fi1cilities. The project sh8ll have 8 m;rics of dry wells nnd retention
wilter runoff. Com:isti1l1t \vith sl811lLlrcl enginecl'ing practice, the
dryweJls will have overflow outlets cxtendinc; to Durant Avenue.
, .
Hefcrcncc
A. Site Plan: Physic81 Design and Pl'Ogr:lll1 Section
/
,
,...-.'
;
92,,) 12l1..nln tJ2:.~i ec l
Crowth M~nagcl1lelll
Plan Submi::sic)Il
(dLl) Fire l'mlcction
--~~~---~-
Tile ev~iltlotion is the ability of the Fire ])cp~ nmcnt to provide
fire response to the project ClccOl'ding LO thl' cst~lblished response
stanch nls.
The project site is located ~lpproxinJatcly 2l0n L. F. (5 city blocks)
from the fire ,;tillion and Ciln expect a m:I:;imum response time of
4:\ minutes 1'1'0111 alert si ren to cquipmeJ1l 'llTiv~\l at site fi re location,
The project sHe i;; served by (2) ilydranu' with ndcquilte stntic pres-
sure for fire protection. Two c!djacent rO~ldv;~lYS, DUnJl1t Avenue
ond illley woy, provide immediate aClTSS for fire vehicles.
The building development: will be additionally protected by a dry
standpipe sy:;tcm, ond ionic smoke detection in individual units.
A project review by l\h. Willard CL1[Jper indic;1tes no foreseeilble
c1cficiL'nci es exi st with n'lY~l I'd l'O fi rc !lrotection,
"
Hekn'ilcc:
A. Project Vicinity Mol', this section
B. Site Plan; Physic;ll I'ksign ill1d Program Section
C. Project ITvi"w Jettel' by M r. Wil1ill'd C. Clapper
Chief, ;\spcn Voluntec:r Fi re DC]Xl nrncnr
(ee) ParkillX Dcsigli
The eViJluation is the design'of required pill'king with respect to
visll~J impact, ex[xlscd paving, convenience and silfety.
All rcC]uirec1[xnking for this project is located c1ilTctly off-alley,
pcrmit:tin~; di rect access to individllill units via covered walkways
and st8irw,1)'s to upper levels, All pJrking is ViSlI<llly removed
from Durant l\vcnllC and public pedesl:1'ian routes serving lhe
neighborblXlc1.
/
IZeference
A. Site I'J:1n, Pll)'~;ical Dc:sign & l'rogram Section
,..-',..",.
"
.........
"
2.25 Durill~t Proj<:::ct
Growth 1\1 ,1n~lgClnc;nt
Plan SuL>lni~~sion
(ff) l\o'lds
--
The evaluation is the C'P~IC;!:/ of exi~;ting rOclc1s to service project
traffic without subslallllcllly ovcJ'loclding or alt:ering traffic pilttcrns.
As shOl'in onlhe Site COl1lc:.\t Drnwiilg, this scct:ion, the project: is
10c;lIc(1 on Durant J\vcnuc appnlximmcly onc-h,llf block cast of
Wcstend ^venuc.
Exarnin:ltion of Ihe trelffic illlj"IU of the project is pl'ima riJy bilscd
on work generated by the Uj\,rr^ t:rml'~IX)rt.1tion study and on recent
convers,'Jllons wit:h I'd r. Steve Lockwood, j\leln IV!. Voorhess & Assoc.,
Jnc" traffic COlbUlt,lIlt for t:lle UlvlT;\ ,~tudy.
The table below presents the trip type and trip frequencies per day
pcr unit for a project unit as estimated by Mr. Lockwood. ThE: 6.5
trip" pCI' unit is less than the 10.0 ll'ips per unit for a typical resi-
clcntinl unit, becilusc tile rJrojcet con,;;'sts or stlldio IInit,; gcner,lling
less peoplc than 1::1 rger ,1 p'lnment 0 r condom i ni UIl1 un j u;. 'fOUll
rrips arc estimillccl between automobile anel ncm-iHltomobile tl'ips.
12:~l2...'rYjJ,~
Estimated
Qlle -:."..~l,L '1'1 i Eo;_
Estimated
Non -automobile
t Ii LPC rc~~lt31rc'::.
Estimateel Non-
C1ut:oml:Dilc ITi ps
Ski ingj
nce rcalion'
.75
60ry
/0
.5
Work
2.00
75%
1.5
Shopping nnc1
Emen'l i nment
].2.'5
750-
IU
.9
Personnl
Business
1,00
"()(P
.) ;"
.5
Other
I.S0
2.'5%
.4
6.S0
609'~ average
3.8
/'
"The 6070'non-iluromobile iwcragc for rcerenrion trips assumes ap-
pluxil11alcly 75~:,-8()?Z, of ski trips n re non<llJtomobi1c bur only 50;!;,,-5570
of sumll1er recn:ation trip'; are non-mrtomo],i]c.
t""'......
..,
,
,....
9?0_Dul',ln~~:<:1C'l'~
Growth Monagcll1l'nt
Pion SubmissiGn
Due to the projecr's conVCllicl1t location ro downrown lIspen :.1lld
public transjxJl'taLion, it is cstim:lIed a high percentage (6C1% to 75%)
of skiing, wlnk, shopping al"] entcnoin!llent trips will be non.,
auto!llobile t ri ps.
lis shown, potcllti;llJ)' (,C1% of the tot;]] projected ll'ips per unit
will be non-automobile tl'ips. The estim'ltcd 2. R automobile 011(';-
way trips per clay ;Ire equiv:lknl to a resident's using hi.', car on
an averllge of appJ'Oxim:ltc1v one time pel' eb)', The walking :lIld
public transporwtion C01l\'l,jienee of tile project's ]oeotion p\u.s
the project's low resident jXlpulation re"'ults ill minima] tr;]fficc
impact created by the project.
Current detail tr:lffie counts ore not aV'liloble for the orea to
qualllilc1tiveJ:: estimMe tlllf[ie il11pllct.
((~(Y) Encnrv
(,b _______.~~__
The evaluation is [lbility of the project, its spaces nmlusc]'C;, to
maximize the cOII:wrvalillll of cllCrgy.
Cllnsistnnt with the ";oiar geot',raphy of the site, [Ill project con-
stnlUiol1 will be l\csi\ynecl and built to maximize soLn utili/otion
<,
ancJ to minimize heat loss, thus reducing the demand placed on the
fossil fuel resource for ,;p:1ce heming, The fo110\'.'ing techniqucs
will be implemented in tllis prlljcCl.
In,;uJarillll
Signi ricllit]y exceeding I'l'glll:it:ory 11IL'l'l11[11 st:lIld~lnls, ext'c'rior
Wd]]S wii] be inQ1111tccJ to H',c26 to 28 min.; roof composil.Cs W
1\='12; floor composite to 1\=20, foundation perimeters to r~=l4,
11 rehitl'elu ral
/
lIrchitecturill dcsign. configures building to optimize thcrmal
chnnlctcdstic.c; of the p]'IljeCL. Exteri()I' wall eXjnsure is mini-
mizecJ by maximum lmit cldj,lcency (clllllmon wo]]), elm\ by vertic[ll
SpllCC ()1'f~,1I1izotion (minimum rlllio of cxtcrior surf:1ccs per sq'. f1:.
of OCCUpil'cl sp;wc), i\J j bnildi ng,; :1 rc oriented wilh high use
interior :~:l:-lCCS !,() tIle Se\!!-Il 1'0 :lchic'vc yi~\'v' \'".bile 1l1::1xirniz,ing
1)~lS'.siv(' solar ilL';11inp' ll(itcntii11
,-' -. ..
,
,.."""
'j
"'"..~"
22S_I].L.J,nll~~])1~0!..':~t,
Crowth ivlilnagClllcJll:
PJ~lJl Submission
Clazed openings on Ilon-suuth CXPOSUl'C'S will be limited to
Uniform Building Code millimums (to comply with vcntilillion
requirel1lenU:). Opcning surrclunc: c1Ullils wi.ll be I'cquircd to
minimize heat loss due to infiltralion,
Totally fLit roof surfaces are dcsignee! for allunito; to rCUlin the
addition,11 im;lILltion value of snowf:111 layers,
Devices
('"onsi stant with solar geogl'aphy of site, sola r collecton; will
be utilized for domestic hot water Ilellting. E1ccCl'ic energy will
be designated for prime! I'y srX1ce hee!ting to reduce fossil fLld
demand (approximately SO;Z, of ('kCl ric IXlwel~ used in Aspen area
is hydro"genernted). j\ulnmll!:ic thermostats will be specificd to.
conrro] night lime space ICmperJltl11'Cs. Fireplace design wi]] use
double damper control, exterior combustion air, glozed fire olx'iling,
nnd hent return ducting. llumidificnl:ion will be w;ed 10 reduce teIll'"
perature reCjuiJ'ed to achieve equIll cOIllforllevc1s.
Heflcrellce
A. Arcl1ircctlll'<ll Drawings; Physical IJcsign :lI1cl Prugram Section
.
r' ,-", '''' ,
11""'" ._..._,
11
1\
lJ
I
j
_ ,,'""~"__"""'_~~"'_' _'h"~ ".-.-.
....-.,,'.,--..... ._,..... ._.~......"_.
. ..~......,~ _.~~ -.
""L "';T>-\~'
i-r-" .>.1\1'...,....
/ / IHICt <jlAII[\\
f{iGf{\,..,rI\,(Bl/___._f(=,,",=-=r_=-"'~"'''''''''~'''''''_'-='''' I' ,...""f,,"C';>'-.-' ~ t.~;'C",...;_'::",""""""r:.~
! twlJ ''lrh . I".',',",'..." ..... ,,,,'," , ... \
i J ,C ~@':-U'i (,;,M/{:", .~
1 El'~oT\N0 tv.um[\.l:~~t1~t"0.~ ~
i ::':::~"lJJ~ltl~,&~,;&1 (g,(~t) @;0$)!~,i~.',,~{i.,;;~:i,i~~F '"'
I "', .. ""," ' ,.'...'.. ',< '\"" .1 c.,...."".. ,.,IIJ- '<~"H NlI"
, '1""':'" III 1'1' I' .,~ i ., I It. .
1''''1[' \ \ ' I
1III 1\.(t~\]lli 1!l1....~ I
'(c' III
'\;'t1
Ii ~,,<J'~ ..~ .(,I.lOn' PilE r7\~K
['II,' ..................- - [CD\?>:EI7 (.IT(
'" rr/l.iL
i
!
1
f1
,I
j
I
j
I
I
I
I
1
j
I
I
I
I'
I
I
1
i
L.._..,_. ,
1,:;:0-"'1
&-ij COt'li'1CKctAL Ut.<E
lliIil;ll~ RESr,HJJ1.\L(i1ULJI-t/v'liLY
nn'l';rllil~ l:t!lr,;r.,.,'".\ ',!,I /-:-
~ll ~LLl! ~, N '\.... <v
~T'ITI 1:[''l.1.'i:n.^[.. I',
UlJl, ,
~W:.:;"~l 1"1'1' II' IPJ II'
L7.-::~.::J t',\:,/ :,VL-Vv
Vicinitv iVlCll)
, I
((3)
,...~ .....,----.
(, ~")J 40~)----~OO
'I
-~._^-~....... ...-
"~'--'------'-''';r--''''~''',,'''''--.-' -.--~- .....
.:"','
. \:11)
..., -,. ~ -- ...
.".......,,--.--......
I
I
1
I
1- '
'I \11-h!.f'.QN,) LDCV[--I---j-" ---,-..-,- ;'''""" f.'i), V=; ','-' ,
l' CW 11U11Pr.EV cww>~-I-ic'l"'lr,!Tl':"70r)irit~:l UJJ[Tlj ~~ rnljPtJ'
:t L:::J h, ,--",.,J l' I IL r I~ 'u
I nJ""T "i' 11' 1<::0 -_.~._- ' f' j I ,,~ .. ., / II:.; ",' . t- ") ,~r;,"~II':: t:.N_~\-' 11'1"
' ",..~ h' c, :, ' 1 ,_,..,:~c',"'::1 I'"~ J /1, ", '," 'Tr-, -',,-'---r-~{, -+.. .,~, " "'" , .>,
I ,J ""'i< :,"b"'" i '.., I \ U 1,lr=' 'f/
I (""' j.P J' ," 1'-. ,,>,-,"",c-/,"I'
I t7f.t~X,['O I.LLEY ---~- - ~~-=~==--___J3:i~~_~-:~~__ __~~-t;~;JL_..Q--J ~_L')--------' l='~:-'~~~:'~'~ -T{~1\,~~,.6ES i:
11'^,TII 0nw>,c~--I-_LL~tDJrj[~~~~]ll rL{~~-n Ji~
j Cf\I<lENJ 04.?'I---l-L.=---~ J ~ -~-"----'-'51LVE:rJ)''>>w
:1 WIEKS AVEJ~'jE -r--.------ --- -==--=:.::...-.::..-::--
rl ' II
[1
II
,
'I
1
._...,.~-;-.. ,_.,....---' "','..-..-'....'...
'-'
-;."".'....,,.-.,.-,,..,, ..,
1__ ...,......-:::: -~'.'- ~--'''cc.-''_'
f -~~,-'--....-........ ,-...,...,..-.., ..-. .. ",..,~ .....','....-, '".' ., '-'~-'"
, ,
"" _0<.' .'.._'-,c :L~_'._""4.<."..,""'.,.c' ~^'...~.... ~. -'-' '-- .
l
I
I
I
1
I
U'A:f.lI!.J 1':'t)\'::\~O
I{.J<X 1\:nSt1~f [1-:'
,
1
I
I
'I
i
1
I
I
\
I-~"-"""'-"'-'"''
I
I
[,- ..'--.---- ,..- ,.....------~_.... ....-,..
~'"
-"
,~)
'-:.v:/
Site Context
r~
o ~I) no
20'J
.. - -p-,,- ,.~
.i'.'
" or',
,__....,.._,_...--....~,_.__~.c. ;..~",....~.....;"..~v_.._... ~_____ ~___~_.............._~"',..~._.-__~
i
I
t'
i
i
!
Ii
I
i
I:
I'
"
"
,
I:
I
I
I
r'
I
I'
!,
I ~
I
,
f
"
i
,
i
"
!.
,
L
r
j:
I
!.'
I,
i.,
H
I'
i'
I'
:-i
,
I'
I
;;
"
i
I
I,
i
,
i ~
1"
,c.,"
...,
,.,,,
"
\
")
!
Cn
. c" .~
o
o
C.,,"
.',,'0'
~J
o
(,-~
t.-"
,~,:
~;:::j
,
(4) J
(;,; 'I
, l
;
)
,.....
'''#
92,,) ])urant Project
--.-----.----------.--
Growth i\lonilgcment
PJi1n Submission
SClC]AL FACILITIES i\NJ) Si':IZVICES
_._--~_._------~----.
( iW ) !.:u bJ i c 'l~ [122" I"-Wi}ll j (:'~1
The evalu,llion is the ilbjlity of the project to be serviced by public
trai'Jsponation.
As f:hown on the Vicinity Map, this scction, Uk' project is located
:350 fl. from the East COOpl:1 am! CJcvcl[lIld bus stop and SSO ft. from
the Durant Avenue and Origin;ll bus stop. Public tran,sportillion, thus,
is within a Ii minute wJlking distaJlce of ['his project.
l\eferellee
-------
A. Vicinity i\lap, this section
l3. Site COlllcxll\lilp, thie' section
(bb) Police PrCll.cc:ti()i~
The cvaluiltion is the ability of the Police l:x.'partrnent to pmvicle
normal protection sen'ices to thl' project with current pen;onnel
ilnd equi pmcnl.
Conversations with l\spc'n Police Depanmellt personnel indicate
the averilge response time to this project would lx' ]-2 minutes and
that this project would not eXll:'ncl present l):ltro] rOllles. No ;](1-
ditionai p:)]jce pcn;ond will be required to providc' norlllal pro-
teclive services to thc projl'Cl:.
,
"11](:, project is IXJLlIlded by two nXldways (Durom Avenuc and the
il]lcy way), facilitiiling ilCCCSS '1m! visuol Control from jXltro] veldcles.
AdditioniiJly, a private security [:>Cltrol service will be retained on
a cominuing basis to provide Ilonna] pnJtectivc ,services, thus re-
ducing the freCjuellcy necess'lry for public lXl]ice patrol.
Ederellce
I'
A. Sitc Context Map, this [;cclion
"
"
...".,i
" '
925 Durant l'roj ect
-."------"----
Growth M;1I1agl'menr
Plan Submission
(ce) (~hj1r]_CilrcFaci~}tic:~;,
The eva]uc1tion is the pro';i"ion of a child care facility within the
Projecl..
A child carl~ facility will be provided for this project, to be 10-
cared at a grade level within the employee housing complex.
Space requirement,; will cunfcnn to the IV1inimum I\ules and
P.egulations for Child Care Centers' Color;ldo Stale Dep8 rtment
of Soci.al Services.
In addition to interior sp8ce ,1Ile1 outdoor plGY arCG pl'ovided for
the project generated children (ages 1-8), the child Cilrc f2.cilily
will bc lilro;e cnoll\!h ro ilbsorb certain of the needs of the im-
b v
mediCite neighl:orhooel.
l\'ls. Terry Enel, Dir(;etor of the i\spcn Montessori School, will
serve ;1S consu]tanl to this de!'lcnt of the pmjeCl,
(del) Ilicyde/Pc:destrj;~J..::~hs
The evaluation is the location of the project relRtive to pedestrian
ilnel bicycle path sy~":ms.
Within casy access of patl1 system,:, the ]ll'ojcct is: 65CJ ft. from
the cxis:ing Ute j\vci1lle pedestri:ll1/lJicyelc trail; 450 ft. to Glory
Hole Pa I'k; 1600 fl. to the clownlown pedestrian mall system,
LinJdng to rhe city sidewalk ~;y'otcm, a sidewalk will lY2 provided by
the project development along Durant Avenue.
Hcfcrence
A. Vicinity Map, this section
B, Site Plan, Pl1ysical Design and Program Section
.-.....,
-,
"J
-
925 Dunmt Project
Growth Management
1'1<111 SUDmi ssion
(ee) lkcycljl~g ~~'acilitie~~.
T'he e\'aluati()!1 is the prol'i~,i()n of refuSl: recycling Llcilities in '
the pwject del'elopment.
Snch facilities will be provided near the pinking :uea of the project,
conveniently accec:sible to lx.1th OCCUJY1]1[S and pick up of the sep-
arated refusc; by the recycle center I'chicle,
Consisrant with the recommendation of Mr. Dennis llolmc's of the
City l\ccycling Center the project will separate containers for p:lass,
tin, aluminum, andncwSpapCl"S in a loc;]tion acce:isible to 8 parked
5 ton flatbed truck, 20 fed long,
l\efercncc
^. Site Phlll, Pl1y::ical Design :md l'mgr:nil Section
(ff) l?::c_sign l:~;:lll~l~;S ~.!: the J J:llKlic,1 Pj)('l~
The evaluation is the ability of the project to accommodatc safe,
convenient movement fOl' handicapped persons.
The site and buildil1\" clesi\!n will jJLTmit unoDstnletcclrflovement
,--) ~.'
(fo)' a wheel cJElir confined person) from any parking space to the
(6) lowccr level sLtlclio units. This is accomplished by walking sur-
faces which Vim not cxccc,cl a ~;]ope of 1:15 (U.I3. C. requirement)
Hetcrcnce
^. Site Plan, Physical fksi(':n anclProgl'arn Section
(gg) Proximity to Commercial Support Facilities
The evaluation is convenient walking distance from the Projecr to
commercial support facilities.
".....""
'"',
.....'"'
'-_."
9 2.'; 1~1I rilntJ::E~~c:':'L
Growth Managcmcnt
Plan Submission
Thc project is convenieJ1[ly located ] ,~' blocks frol11 the City 1\1arketj
Durant Mall ilnc1 "pproxim,1tcl{ 1600 feel from tlie t]owl1lown pedestrian
mall system (5,~ minutes walking distance),
Hefcrcnce
A. Vicinity l\1ap, Ihis section
,
r--' ..~'
".--,...--,.,---...,--.'
.-_.,_.~ ....-..".. ....-...~_._""... ,_........
,,-'...._. ......-.
_' _ _. _ .,.__ "'._*W._"_-' _... '_ ~'--...<-.-..- "'..~_ ".,., -.... ..... ~ ,.
I
1
1
,
.j
I
]
I
I
I
,
i
,
I
1
,j
1
1
I
I 'J\U-r.u.!D LDlkl---Lj -11------ ----,.-ch..:), '"'\ I'~~ rj=j r-~ (1'\rr:~lJ """'r\ll)
. j _. f-":'~ : J JC~__-i U I'~ 0 ~ rr::1.j -"1 ~-- ~-~ ~d0(' P;'0ii~,':r.->
lCLD~lJNTI.t7W~T.:> --"f/l'! 11':'~'ill ~_~''':'-J1 1;;11] I~ :!j 1 I:
, lLJJl c", J 1',-: JI 1 ~ I rr I'....J, I
1 - - L oj L 1 ~, , L _I. ,,_.___ j ,
1 \.J\:=')l tllP SlKEtT - _ -~ _~___~ _ ~__~~______ __ _/--- --------yr-j------ -- r:YPt"vW I
11, P~~Wf A'IS"'!" ~l/('I r fn"~]1-.- ",r",i~/,'~, I/W11~~:c;,__:.'.==C> ~,"','H/::~~~ ::<~ ms, .
I . l' J'r:';f'"] '11 F~" (I Jili(k:'/~t.,.../U1
L :"",,,\t_.J--f~_-:-~::~~~~i Ij ..L,t n__ l'"'-"";~i"\./
IJ r-EtJu~w l,eLlY -- ..... ,~,-..__,.J,,: __ '__, u,t..... A. L "....~,:/::......~ lV-!\W"',i':",'~
II '"'' "',,,~-ifrolH1r][K~Jn mE'1f~j~
.~ C!1AfrJU S,tA,!-~ -~~----_./ ""--~---~-------'-----'S\LVtKG!-o....'
I W"'U'lliCT~--~==~:-:: - - --=---'~
l \
1
j
1
,
j
,
:1
1
j
1
1
1
1
1
j
j
I
f' -T '",..,',,'" ~~'~7:,~ ".
,
,
I
L..._ ...'_U ____. ~_ _~. "..~,-,-._,_..~,.._., ,'___..__...... ...~ ....__....,.."..__..."... C'.--'. _...-....'--.~--..----.....-
I
l
I
!
;'
l ~
i.
!;
!;
j"
I
"f:
"
"
Site Conte);t
r.._r------"\~_----..J
o ~o ")0 :00
~''\
(V)
I
!
,-",;r'."r
""':.::;" ," ''',-1.".'
":.<
'.~\_c::.,.~
:". ,.
-,-_....,;.,......~_..._---~_.-'-'.-.....~ ---~,'~..,".. '-.-.,.
.."-..._._~..
~"'"
,-....
'-..,./
'-"
92S ) )urant Project
Growth i\1 alwgemelll
Plan ;;u!Jmission
1';1\1I'1'oYEE IIOUSINC
The ev,l]uation is tlie p"'lTelltage of low ,1Ild moderate income housing
unit s provided by tlie development pnJI'X)S,ll.
4S;z)-5C);~ of pnljeCl UBi", clesignated l,O\'1 Income' housing arc awarcled
12 point',;,
The 925 DUl'illlt Project ii; the employ'.:" housing lX)J.tion of a complete
GMP proposal which combines two (kvclopment locations (925 IJurant
aBd SOO S. Calena) ,1 s thc tot:ll project submi);sion.
The total projcct submisc)ion is comprisecl of 29 Iota] unit:, of whicli
16 units arc design,ltecl as single bcdnYlm condominiums ,md 13 units
,1S studio cmployee units. 1'lic project i" designed to pnlvide 12
employee units, located at 925 Durant, to the low income employee
group at large and 1 crnpleJyee unit spccifically for managers [juarten;
,lttcnclant: to ;iOO South CalC'na conclom! niulll s.
lis sl1cwm by the typiC1l unit plan on thisscction, each sludio un,il is
approximately 425 s. 1'. i1l1cl is addition,]Uy SUPIX1HCd by common
laundry, slorilge ,lnd ,by c ,rc J'aciliii<'s. Larger than nOl'll1:11 this
slildio is desigl1L'd to accommodate c,liill'Cd liviiig SP,lClC for a mini-
mum of 2 OCCl<]XlIIlS. U)'Xln receiving eM!' approval that pOrlicJlI of
the project cOlllpl'ising ernployee housing would IK: irnmcc1ialcly
constructed mid ilV8ilablc for occupailcy prior to Dccember, 1978.
The cmployee unit mix and ]:ent stniCturc 1'01' this pl'oject is sub-
mj ttcd ,I s l'oJ]ows:
% 0[----- '-
tut,d
pwj ect Designatiol]
units
r~:.
Unil S
13
4.s~Z, LolV Income
TOlal r'lIllllUa] Tot,11 '1IIum,l!'-
monthly . Income monthly Income
rent/one I Group/ rcnt/two Croup/
occupalll CHch OCCU)Ylnts eelch
toccupant OCCUlYlm
,-- --------- 1-.------
$175/mo. S700CJ/yr. S200/mo, S:fOOQLx,r::
* Annual income group calculated using :)()j~ of gross annual income
allocated to housing cost (Planning Office Standard).
..
#
.-
~
l<'h.,./
--,
'<""
925 Duranr Project
C l'(lwrh 1\1 anugement
Pl;1I1 Submission
The rental stnlCl.Ure for the employee units is designed to permit
a nece.%ary low income ~;uppon gl'Oup to maintain affonlnblc housing
within walking distnnce of m;ljor cmplo)'nwnt gcner;ltors in Aspen.
Spending 30/(; of annu;ll income for rcnt a single occuixlnt making
$7000/y1'. m;lY afford ;] [;tudio or, if sharing a studio, 2 persons
milking $'1O()O/yr. each can afford a unit in this project. Assuming
1O()% double occupancy, the (13) uniu; pl'Oviclccl would house 26 low
income employee;,'; wl1o,;e illll1ual income is S'1000/yr. or greater.
This project is within casy walking dis!ilnce of alllJ13jor employ-
ment, shopping ;Iml recreotionill (Iestinotions in Aspen.
A tOl;11 of (12) points is anticipated under rhe housing scction for
thi s projecr submi ssion.
P.cfercnc',':
A, Typiutl Unit Floor Plan; thi,; secrion
B. Architectural Drawings; I~lysic;il Design ilnd Program Section