The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.101 S Mill St.HP-1987-03D l g. AI.ll st _lj 2 -1 9 67 - A-3 = "Ir/o /5, Mi - Elli's 1987 file #1 - --- <Â°et 1 P/42 1 t/*gH=4 d 'ex t'U--'12-4 ~OK H 2-46 , D~ & C.la 1 H P A r,9 J , i CASE DISPOSITION ELLI'S RESTORATION PLAN AMENDMENT On November 19, 1987 HPC approved the following requested changes to the Elli's restoration plan: (1) replacement of the cornice piece facing Main Street that is rotten, starting the new piece approximately 4 feet back, and (2) treatment of the Mill Street wall at the southeast corner to install new siding where damaged or missing, move the existing cornice to the south corner and add a new piece approximately one foot long, and install a 6 1/4" vertical trim board along the south edge of the historic store- front, and (3) the.Main Street plan of alterations as amended to mix new boards with old boards as presented at the meeting. HPC approved a motion to recommend to the Building Department to remove the stop work order (red tag) at this time. HPC approved a motion to table action on the proposed screening of roof-top mechanical equipment until the applicant comes back with further study of different location, height and screening of the equipment. sb.ell.19.2 t; ri Â·. Acit ,>* < *~p'/&*, c ' - i -230- 6 to, r.a,'44,4.f:4 b L 2, 4 ...4 ,..v. 20,-j, 2 3) A. J, n. 0 , 4 4- 6 Â· . ' tfu .- i X 5 i - ~~=ill HAGMAN YAW 27 October 1987 ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Mr. Steve Meyer Shaw Construction 743 Horizon Court, Suite 109 Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 Re: Elli's Dear Steve: This letter is to relate painting instructions for the existing walls on the Elli's project: 1. All boards which are damaged will be repaired and nailed securely into place by Shaw Construction. 2. Boards which are severely damaged and absolutely cannot be repaired will need to be replaced. If a board needing replacement is long enough to be partially saved, then it should be cut at a stud and partially saved. All boards which need to be replaced need to have prior approval of the planning office. This should be accomplished on site with a prior scheduled meeting with Steve Burstein and Heidi Hoffmann. All replacement boards need to exactly duplicate the piece which they replace in every way. 1 3. Siding and trim will be powerwashed and scraped to remove loose paint chips. The painting subcontractor needs to take extreme caution to avoid damaging any boards during this ~ process (which he has assured me is possible to do.) 1 Some isolated boards which have accumulated many layers of I paint and severe weather checking will need to be stripped; this can be called out on a board by board basis at the site. 4. Bare wood spots will then be primed and the entirety of the walls repainted. All parties should realize that this process will not produce a "new appearing building; all old siding, trim and paint cracks, bulges and irregularities will show through. Thank you. I cerely, John Cottle AIA i Partner J C: sv J CC: Heidi Houston Phil Holstein Steve Burstein Heidi Hoffmann Dave Reams F..i". 11 1 ~}1 1 : ~ -, ~ ." ... , ij lil ~ 1 . Â·, OCT 1 6 1987 , j HAGMAN YAW 16 October 1987 ARCHITECTS - -- LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Mr. Steve Burstein Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Elli's of Aspen Dear Steve: This letter is to recap our conversation at the site today regarding the removal of asbestos panels on one portion of the existing Elli's walls. In order to remove and reinstall the siding, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The existing boards will be numbered per row and board. 2. Nails will be tapped from the back (behind the asbestos board) to push the heads away from the siding. 3. Nails will be removed with a pry bar resting on backing so that the existing boards will not be damaged. 4. The asbestos boards will be removed and hauled away per Tom Dunlop's requirements. 5. After carefully storing the siding and trim, they will be reinstalled over a 1 /4" ply sheathing board on the existing studs. For your reference, I have enclosed a photograph of the portion of the wall in question. I have requested the foreman at the job site to hold off on the removal of the boards for as long as possible; your prompt reply is appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely, L.kh n Cottle AIA Partner JC:sv enclosure CC: Heidi Houston Steve Meyer Dave Reams Gideon Kaufman Paul Taddune Bill Drueding .. 1 11' - thÂ©1 - \44 NUS (Â£466 9Â·1(0 -87 Mr. John Cottle Hagman Yaw Architects 210 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 October 15, 1987 Dear John: I received your letter today requesting to remove the existing asbestos sheathing board and reinstall the existing siding over new sheathing effecting approximately 1/3 of the existing Mill Street walls of the Elli's Building. In order for staff and HPC to evaluate this proposal, we need more detailed information identifying effected walls, boards to be removed, and the techniques to be used to assure that no materials are damaged that could be saved. I suggest that you call me to arrange a site visit today or tomorrow, as well as prepare a more detailed written and pictorial description of your proposal. Upon receipt of this application material, I will schedule this matter for HPC's next meeting on October 27, 1987, anticipating that this amendment is more substantive than what staff is authorized to approve. Sincerely, Steve Burstein, Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office cc: Jim Wilson, Chief Building Inspector Tom Dunlop, Environmental Health Department sb.e1015 HAGMAN YAW 13 October 1987 ARCHITECTS 4 oCT 14 1-Â·3-J LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 L-- - - 303/925-2867 Mr. Steve Burstein Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Steve: This letter is to inform you that approximately 1 /3 of the existing Mill Street Elli's walls (the southern or newer portion) has asbestos sheathing board which has been tested at 30% asbestos content. The Owners have elected to remove the sheathing board and reinstall the existing siding over new sheathing. Please let me know if there is any additional information which you will require. Sincerely, 5-/*lakÂ» . Uohn Cottle AIA Partner JC:sv CC: Heidi Houston Steve Meyer Dave Reams Tom Dunlop Members of the HPC *11!11111111111111 - Mr. John Cottle Hagman Yaw Architects 210 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Repositioning of Elli's Walls October 8, 1987 Dear John, This letter is written for the purpose of reminding you that the approval for the Elli' s Restoration and Expansion has not been amended, and the applicant is still required to reposition the existing walls of the Elli's Building exactly as they had been prior to disassembling. Without notification to and approval by the Planning Office, no parts of the walls may be removed or replaced, as was a condition of HPC's approval. We assume that you will adhere exactly to this plan since no notification to the Planning Office or request to HPC for approval of rebuilding the walls have been received. I believe that the discussion with HPC on September 22, 1987 also clarified this matter. Chief Building Inspector Jim Wilson informed me that he has not received any follow-up from you on the matter of fire protection measures allowing you to reuse the existing walls. You may want to contact the Building Department. These were the matters I called you about earlier this week but did not get through to you. If you have any questions please contact me. Sincerely, Steve Burstein, Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office cc: Jim Wilson, Chief Building Inspector Alan Richman, Planning and Development Direcotr sb.e470 l t. - 5,71.11/I?J '1 06 M;Â»443 Charles Cunniffe stepped down. Jan Derrington, architect: This is a modification of a previ- ously approved remodel of this structure which was formerly owned by George Hamilton. Jerald Barnett has purchased it within the last year who has some modifications he wishes to do to the building. The original modifications were to expand the living- room somewhat to the west and add a porch around the west and north ends of the existing house and add a kitchen to the south east corner of the existing first floor with a coVered porch around it. Add on eight feet to the rear of the building to create another bedroom and above that to enlarge that space eight feet also for another master bedroom. The south of the house faces to the alley. The porch will still go along the front of the house which is the north side facing Bleeker Street. The porch will wrap around from the north to the east side of the house and somewhat to the west also on the front. We are not changing the front porch as this is what was approved before. The FAR calculations prompted us to delete part of the porch on the east side. Our proposal is to have a decorative element above the doors which will come out a maximum of 12 inches from the wall. The pavilion roof like roof structure over the back porch which surrounds the kitchen addition that was previously approved is going to remain. On the back side facing the alley there was a portion of the roof over the lower floor which was going to be a roof deck, they want to close that and make that into a large master dressing area. Georgeann; I don't have any problems with this. Steve: The renovation plans were first approved in 1985. We realized that this was fairly massive alteration of the structure however the Committee felt that it is primarily in keeping with the structure and many other aspects of the building had been changed over the prior years. The existing porch is not orig- inal. The changes that they are proposing are minor to what had been approved and they seem appropriate and I would recommend approval. Nick: It looks like we have an increase in bulk but not in mass. MOTION: Patricia made the motion to approve the plans as presented today. Nick second the motion. All approved. Motion carries. ~5 ELLI ' S MINOR AMENDMENT REBUILD WALLS Steve: This is a request to replace the existing walls with new construction. If the existing walls are not reused as the plans were submitted then we don't believe this is an historic preser- vation project as it was granted an allocation to proceed through 5 1 f 1 j ? aÂ«h ,: h..A-y the GMP exemption. That exemption states its for the enlargement of or change in use in a structure which has received individual historic designation. If you don't use those walls which were the only restoration component of the project then it is a completely new structure and we feel that is very troubling. The exemption does not say you can construct a new structure replica- ting features, that is not what it is for. If the applicant wishes for this request to be considered a stop work order will be issued at the direction of the Planning Director. A public hearing should be scheduled with this committee for a full review. It is not a minor amendment it is significant. At that time I would also initiate a hearing whether or not the historic landmark designation should be rescinded. Georgeann: Would the applicant like to explain their position? John Cottle: We have done everything that we had represented tof ; you. The walls are braced and laying there ready to be replaced. The money has been allocated and that direction is still there. About six weeks ago the walls had been moved and the contractor brought up the point that we should look at the walls. The siding has all been replaced, the columns that went down between the windows are rotted and they will need to be replaced. The stud walls that hold the siding have been burned at some point and there is very little of those left. We are ready to go down the course that we said we would go down. It just raised a question..is this really sane? Jim Wilson and I resolved the solution of the walls before this meeting. Georgeann: You and Jim have decided on a way that you can rebuild the existing walls to meet the one hour fire code if we decide that you must use the existing walls. Jim are you comfortable with this? Jim Wilson: Yes I am. Heidi Houston: I thought I should state the concerns so that maybe you can address this in the future with somebody else that if there are problems you can address them in some way that makes sense. We have put the money aside, we are going to do it however you want. There is a matter, is it sane to do what we are doing, does it make sense? We will do it even if it cost us $20,000 to do it that way. We had planned for it so we will have the cranes come back and do it. There is a lot that has to be replaced and you must be aware of that. Steve: The conditionÂ©of 'approval was to replace on a piece by piece informing the planning office prior toÂ·what has to be replaced./ - Heidi: There is going to be a lot. You should come to the site and look at it and Dave will be happy to show you. The constru- 6 1 t , ction guys told us that we were going to loose the whole wall and that it needed to be replaced. Georgeann: We suddenly have a building restoration with nothing old in it. That says don't worry about HPC, keep coming back /4 every day and tell them things have changed and pretty soon you can build a whole new building. Heidi: How are you going to know if a little house from the street, when somebody starts pulling it apart if it Was original or old until they pull it apart. They don't know. John: You can go by and identify board by board what is old and what is not because the dimension change. The old boards were a full one inch wide for trim and new ones are 3/4 inch. Nick: Two weeks ago I stated in the minutes "one more trip across the foundation you won't be able to use those walls at all". That is what has been going on over there. Those walls are subject to whatever activity is going on at that site and they are not really being protected. They are going to be in worse shape before you are done. You haven't even started with your outside walls. I really believe when we originally approved to save that as a historic structure was a mistake and we have to pick it up from there. I don't believe we have anything there that we are restoring because of the condition it was in and the way it has been moved around. It hasn't been moved off the site, it's laying up against the building. Heidi: It hasn't been touched since it has been there. Nick: I walk by there everyday and I've seen beams bang into the sides of the walls. I've been monitoring that building at least twice a week and I see no way at all that you are going to save any part of the boards and planks particularly the condition they are left in while the work is going on. Heidi: I'll check it out with Dave. He's telling me that nobody has been going near them. Charlie: I think the question is how responsible does the applicant need to be to obtain the opportunity to take a building and historically restore it and renovate it. At some point when you get approval from this Committee to do that it seems to be that there is a responsibility that lies with you to accomplish that task. To put the full foundation of the basement underneath there you saw the necessity to do the restoration and in my opinion you saw the necessity to dismantle the walls rather than leave the building intact and jack it up, go under it and put the foundation in and put the building back down and go from the inside and restoring it. It seems that the opinion of our Committee is that there are ways in which you can restore these 7 , 1. 4 buildings, even the wood buildings. But at this point the hardship is that perhaps your approach to restoration by disman- tling the walls individually they become next to impossible to deal with. Heidi: We didn't know until the backs came off that the wood had been burnt. John: We aren't really claiming a hardship. What we are claiming is the realization of the fact of what is there. Our early representation was that we would take the walls off and put them back and we are ready to do that. There is a lot of damage there, the fire and the rot and to me changed the issue enough to come back. Steve: If you had been conscientious enough to discover that prior to disassembling the building perhaps it would had been appropriate to say we can't disassemble this building and put it back together as it is too unstable and we need to try a differ- ent method. That would have put us in a better position to understand. Charlie: When I came on the board at the very end of this application when I voted it was on the architectural second phase of the new addition to the building. One of my comments was that you should be commended because there was a lot of integrity added to the building but I was of the understanding that the old building was having a new building attached to it and in my opinion it is going to be almost impossible to accomplish that even with whatever effort you make to restore what is there. Georgeann: This is a problem with our wooden buildings, they aren't Mt. Vernon buildings that have been preserved for 200 years. We have buildings that have been used, changed, covered up, burnt and re-panelled and everything else and we are going to have a problem. We've got to figure this out. Heidi: Our point was to come back and bring it as an issue so that hopefully, maybe it is something that needs to be looked at and you could address it in another way. We decided to go ahead and spend the time and money to come here and at least discuss it. Georgeann: I appreciate the effort you are going through and I appreciate the expense of the walls and the fact that you are taking the time and money to do so. Saving you from going through the GMP process also has saved you money. Money is not necessarily an issue here. We've saved you a lot of housing also and we have done a lot of research to understand where we stand on this situation. I'm glad you are coming back because what you represented to us is not what is really there. I don't mean you did this on purpose but maybe more study, more taking of the 8 backboard off the wall etc. should have been done and more investigation. Maybe you couldn't because it was still owned by Elli's etc. etc. but maybe whoever comes before us with a building ought to know better what his building is before he comes. John: Again, we can carry this out and our representation was to take the walls off and put the walls back. Georgeann: Steve, what were our alternatives when you gave us those notes at the beginning. One that we can stop work. Steve: I stated it in terms of what the Planning Office would do in the situation that this request has made. The only way that we feel we could process it is in a manner of stopping the work because any further development would be on the basis that what they are doing is according to the approved plan and the approved plan had changed so radically that we didn't feel that should be the method of operation and that a public hearing could be scheduled for the review of this request and at that time I would also initiate rescinding the designation of the structure because a new structure is not an historic structure. Georgeann: Is the Glidden house designated? Steve: The Glidden house is designated. Georgeann: That is virtually rebuilt also so it shouldn't be designated either. If this is designated that should be desig- nated. Those two places to me should fall under the same category. Steve: The other aspect of it is the GMP aspect of it and the Glidden house did not do that. We have language in here that says "In a structure which has received individual historic designation" that is what the changes, additions and enlarge- ments can occur to. We simply can not say that they are fulfill- ing that aspect, that they were given an allocation for via HPC's approval if it is an historic structure. Georgeann: However we can't just stop and tell them to go through the GMP process unless we want to have a hole. John: We're not going to do that. Steve: That may be the result though. Georgeann: That may be the result but it serves no one. Bill: What everybody said is true and all I can impress upon John is that this Committee has given quite a bit of leeway to this project and relied on you as a professional. Your office 9 L 1 1 came to us with a solution on how you were going to save the facade of that building and before that you were allowed to circumvent the GMP system and were allowed to build a nice project. We have to impress upon you that we have to work both as a committee and you as applicants really closely together to do the best job that we can to restore these walls. Not just put those walls back up and make a mockery of this system. I think we really have to work hard on it and get back into it. It was a learning process and we knew we were gambling because we all suspected the building probably was in bad shape because it was a 100 year old building and had not been taken care of. It was a model project and we made some mistakes along the way on both sides and I think we have to do the best we can to rectify that. I'll offer my help as a Committee member if it is necessary. Your office came to us and we thought you were more than qualif- ied to do the job so I think you can do a good job. John: .r.have no doubts thatâ€¢we can put'them back'in better * *shape than they were taken down. Heidi: We also came to you because from the City point of view we were getting things saying we were going to have to replace and I don't know how you solved it John but we were in a fix because HPC wants us to do this and the City wants us to do this and what do we do now. If John has solved that, that helps us right there. We didn't know which direction to go until this meeting today. Georgeann: We don't need to vote. What we are saying is we want to continue in the direction of restoration because we feel that is the only direction we can go. I was concerned about one thing which is under restoration, since we only have to speak the walls and the paint on the walls I presume the paint is going to stay as it is on the Elli's building. Heidi: I'm not sure yet as the color that is on there is not Herbert Buyer Blue. We are trying to get the new colors right now to see what it really is. Georgeann: We are really interested in the color. If you would work with us on that we feel that in the original minutes you all agreed to work with us on the color and that is all that we have left under these circumstances. John: Roger Moyer of Aspen Painting said the color that is on there is not the original color and he has the original color. B ill: We're using this as a model project and we all are learning from it and hopefully everybody can benefit from it. People are looking at this as somebody who has circumvented the GMP and they look at it as a totally new building. We have to make it as much of a restoration as we can with what is left. 10 . Georgeann: I think the applicants have been more than agree- able. Steve: On the landscaping I had a call from Darin of the Parks Dept. saying one of the trees on Main St. has been killed from the construction and will have to be replaced and also he is concerned about the mistreatment of the pine trees that are being saved in the rear of the lot and he is afraid they may die. MINOR DEVELOPMENT EXPLORE BOOK STORE REAR ADDITION Jim Breasted: If you would refer to the south elevation. The four windows will be changed to one fixed window and we want to make the back look like the front and enclose the area under the deck. The west elevation changes somewhat also with the projec- tion of the balcony. Charles: Would that go right to the property line? Steve: No as they still have a fenced in yard. Steve: This is a designated structure and the enclosure of the rear area under the deck would increase the square footage by 144 square feet and that is a commercial expansion that would be exempt via the GMP expansion for historic expansions. They would be replacing windows and the materials would match the existing. Because the alterations occur in the rear of the structure its virtually not visible from Main Street or Monarch Street. It is an alteration to the portion of the house that does not appear to be original. Charles: Is that part of the remodel that was done by Erdman & Lipsen? Steve: I believe so. I feel that it is in keeping of the character of the structure and it is not an inappropriate alteration at all and I would recommend approval. MOTION: Charles made the motion to approve the additions to the Explore Booksellers as presented by Jim Breasted here today. Nick second the motion. All approved. Motion carries. CLEANERS EXPRESS BUILDING Chris Rightings: At the last meeting the Commission felt what had been done earlier was not what was approved. Tom Shrader and Wayne Stryker are here. Instead of making a partial brick wall and the rest R wall we have found a place where we can get brick to match in Kansas City. The wall will be all brick. Georgeann: Does one loose some of the bricks when torn down? 11 r â€¢ Tom Shrader, owner of the building: There is a 20% loss. Georgeann: Your proposal is for the brick wall and Tom will explain what happened on the previous approved plans. Chris: Your objection to the wall was that the R wall did not match with the bottom half of the wall in brick. At that time we did not think we could match the brick. We have located brick and will do the wall in brick. Tom: I feel we had completed what we had to do other than the color. We put in a matching store front and the color of the store front is grey as opposed to a bronze and the trim paint was never discussed. Georgeann: When someone comes before us and says the materials will be the same materials and colors to match we assume that means the same colors. We approved bronze fascia and store front frame. When you say bronze it doesn't make sense to have aluminum instead. Tom: I understand and don't know where that went astray. After it passed here Wayne and the tenants got together and the tenants wanted to upgrade and it has worked. The metal on the store front is anodized metal and it cannot be painted. Georgeann: The other store front buildings are bronze. Tom: You cannot paint the metal frame. Charles: I know someone who did paint it but sanded it down first. Nick: The commitment was to do the frame in a bronze anodized metal. Wayne: They are both aluminum store fronts and they are the same materials. Georgeann: I'm sorry Wayne but we have a miscommunication. When we say to match we mean 'to match' and that means anodized aluminum is a material verses regular aluminum. Charles: It is to be the same and look the same. Wayne: Anodizing is really a color. Georgeann: I'm afraid I will have to disagree with you. Nick: The remark was made that it looked better between the owner and the person on the street, different than what was 12 i n . .t work with you not against you and preserve homes. Whether you ic) legislate or you don't, people have to come to someone to as k questions. You have an obligation on the board to understand why you have an upset public. Bill: A lot of the comments made here by the public should be directed to Council and P&Z. Kathryn Lee: Why doesn't this board get involved. Bill: At certain points this board does get involved with P&Z. Mary: The planners set the agenda for both, work on the things, bring in the people to discuss it and that was it. I am arguing 'j t. if you are responsible for historic preservation then you as a board should be responsible for the entire thing from concept to finish. Steve: At this point there is a resolution from P&Z recommend- ing incentives. City Council looked at the incentives and tabled action because they wanted further study. It is going back to Council the second meeting of July. FINAL REVIEW ON ELLI'S RESTORATION John Cottle: The Main St. elevation will be the same, I will talk about the Mill St. elevation. The Parapet will be braced 1 1 front and back, lifted off and then stored on the site. The kickplates will be rebuilt, the planters will be relined with copper or rebuilt. New windows will be installed and we are currently pricing, one is clad and one is wood. The trim between the windows will be removed piece by piece and if it is st ill reusable we will then reuse it on the building. This is the same procedure that will take place on Main St. except that the entire wall rather than just the parapet will be removed and restored on the site and placed back on the foundation. All the existing doors will be reused. Bill: Elli's will be pulled apart and almost leveled to the ground and put back together. Some kind of notification should j be made to the public to make them aware that the original materials are going to be reused. Mary: A sign should be put up relating the restoration to the public. John: We would be happy to put up a sign. One problem that we have found is that there are no foundations under the majority of the building. In addition to no foundations they are going to put a basement in. The present kickplates are plywood and need to be changed and the trim will be the same. 1 \ C f 8 zn. 1 / Â·1 Steve: One of the conditions of approval was that the applicant come back with detailed restoration plans and this 'is in compli ance. This is a quality restoration project and the operation of taking down the walls be understood so that the public and the Committee are not surprised of what is happening. Th i s pr o j ect is an attempt to save everything that can be Â· saved and I would recommend if the window sashings need to be changed that they be done in wood as they are more authentic and this is an attempt to do an authentic restoration. Mary: I believe that there are exceptions, the rents are so high...I feel if clad windows can be used and that reduces the cost, then clad windows should be used over wood windows. i Patricia: I have no dislikes with the project and admire what they are attempting to do. Bill: It troubles me to do this kind of restoration, it puts a burden on the architect and the client. What you are doing is taking the building apart and replicating it and so we are building a replica of Elli's not restoring Elli's. When you have an historic building that hasn't changed in awhile, the charm of preservation is that thi.s building has withstood the test of time. To take it apart and put it back it is a replica. We are creating a burden on the client and the architect allowing them to take it apart and save parts of it which is an added cost as and so we are not doing restoration here we are replicating. I'm j opposed to keeping the structure and working within the structure willing to do this as a test but I feel the Committee should address this at some point, what restoration is, what preserva- tion is, what is replication and what is new structure. Steve: My understanding is that a basic distinction between : restoration and a reconstruction would be that they are utilizing the original parts. The Glidden house has all new parts, they did not try to reuse the original parts of it. Bill: We're reducing this down to a point where all we're saving is the siding and if the siding is the least expensive 1 part of this building you might as well put up new siding. That 4 is going to be the next thing, John will come back and say we tried to save the siding but it didn't work. If you want to save this building I feel you should be working within the confines of the structure. MOTION: Mary made the motion that the owners of Elli's be given a little discretion on the restoration process. That what they have presented today is more than acceptable and if they find that it is difficult to do what they are doing that they be given the leeway of putting up new boards. Nick: Second the motion. All favored. Â· Motion carries. 9 IrÂ·M Â· -'160 L.e i . 4,1 -= 29*21 ' /11/hutt 6-23-37 1 RÂ·e storA#kn PIâ€¢h i 4 pp Mvel I ,-Â·'i , .4 r--3 Steve: May I ask if we could ask the applicant co inform the - Planning Office when different replacements are necessary. In that way we can tell the public what is going on. Bill: Would somebody on the board like to monitor this project? Nick: . I would be very happy to. MOTION: Mary made the motion that those residences and commer- cial buildings within the Woods building be notified that they can put in clad windows if they need to be change. Patricia: Second the motion. All favored. HISTORIC DESIGNATION & CONCEPTUAL REVIEW 701 E. HOPKINS Stan Mathis: The house is a clap board house built in 1880 ' s and HPC has rated it a 3. Our intent here is to ask you to designate the structure historic and by doing so it will allow us to apply for an exemption under GMP so we can add on to the structure which is in the office zone. We would like to add approximately 3700 sq. feet. to it, it exists now at 830 sq. ft. not including theÂ· porch which is on the front of the building. There was an addition added on to in 1960 to the original structure. We would like to turn the house 90% so that the elevation that faces Hopkins St. side would now face Spring St. t The original proposal did not have a center court yard. The t actual square footage of the structure is 3300 sq. feet and 400 square feet of balconies and stairways. We will end up with 4000 sq. feet of office space. We need the designation to make the GMP exemption. If this board doesn't agree with this proposal we need not go any further. We would really like to replicate the building as much as possible. Steve: If the Committee gives conceptual approval and a recommendation for designation then it goes to P&Z and then to 4 Council for first and second reading of an ordinance because is a ~ zoning designation. Stan has attempted to utilize a small house i and make it a restoration and an expansion. I don't think that the concept works, to add 3300 sq. feet to a structure that is 830 sq. feet now and to use massing that is very much larger than the original structure is not compatible, it is not in the scale that it should be. The structure is rated a 3 and is not an iexceptional structure, the massing is not compatible. Bill: The is an example of our incentives program where a structure has been evaluated at a low score. The potential buyer of the property is looking to upgrade this structure, give it designation that would allow him to expand and take availability of our incentive program that allows him to increase the FAR on 10 * ~+4~,JAÂ¥,Â·.â€¢~~- 1 / UPTY. A . . I .mit,Fal,) } -,1 19 June 1987 * : ~ HAGMA-~~~YAW 1 ARCHITECTS liD 210 SO U T ! 1 GALE N A ASPEN. CO!.ORADO HIM I Members of the Historic 303'915-1867 Preservation Committee City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 ' testo,j,24 ?\Ah Re: Elli's Restoration Plan 1 Dear HPC Members: f! At this time we would like to present our restoration plan for the existing Mill & Main Street exterior walls of Elli's. The entire body of this plan is encompassed in the construction documents and specifications which are available at our office. It was determined upon the initial inspection of the existing walls that the original clapboard-sided north wall and the entire parapet wall above the storefronts (at Mill & Main) could be braced, removed and stored on site. When repositioned these walls will be attached to the new structure. While removing e and repositioning, the contractor shall be responsible for bracing f and stiffening so that, once repositioned, the wall is intact and 4 f sound. All exterior wood siding and trim shall be powerwashed , and damaged boards replaced with wood pieces to exactly match j the existing, primed and painted. The existing awnings, light fixtures and signage shall be removed, safely restored and replaced at the end of construction, unless it has been determined not reusable. For example, the existing awnings are extremely dirty and difficult to retract. New awnings would match the old and i be retractable. The existing planter. boxes will be removed, i repainted or rebuild and will receive 24 GA copper sheet metal liners. The original storefronts are extremely racked and out of plumb j because of age and the lack of a foundation. The entire northeast j end has sunk dramatically, and it was determined that it would be too hard to remove them with the glazing intact. In addition, new storefront glazing would meet the City of Aspen's Energy code. At a previous meeting, we proposed to upgrade the existing - kickplates from plywood to vertical 1 x 2" beaded ceiling board with edge trim. All efforts will attempt to salvage and restore the wood trim at these storefronts. The storefront cornice/header will have to- be rebuilt around the new structural header and - steel angel that will hold the existing parapet. See accompanying diagrams. -'.1- 6 4.5.M / r- HPC Mt, m\,ers 19 jiti,t, 1 987 Page l wt, The ig/:ling doors and metal grillage will be removed and restored as bt.*t 1"Â·r the condition of the material. All jOInit , cuts or other marks which occur during removal, const i 1 i, hon and replacement shall be patched and repaired. Care 41,Â·â€¢11 be taken during construction to protect the walls befon, th,Â·y are repositioned on new foundation. Phott,4 1, *,1 ) tls of the exisitng walls have been taken with a surveyor's f me.1 3 c and 11â€ž 2 rod that will help determine vertical dimensioning, ''asting door and storefront details have been drawn. , '"f~{1 your comments, concerns and questions with regard 1 to 1,1 tÂ·:,, /eng the integrity of these existing walls while accommodating Thank VA. the ItÂ· v, nddition. Very truly yours, Hagman Yaw Architects, Ltd 1 1 J y <Lk-3-91 1 9 1 + Heidi Hoffmann AIA Project Manager 2 CC: 51 8'4 Construction enclt,t,W'54 i:1 :4 4 - . . 0 ./ 4 - i ely-g Â«r\*2 ,+ . j, 121Â»:It- 12) 00112 - i 1251Â°{sal-ety OPANÂ¢- 1 HAILÂ» f 1 &. .4-' t- 1 \ 1 1-111 4 11 51,132 L,L; ~ <0 0% emAges# 13->< i-'.1- NA-1-4- 4> *322Â·,NE.*29 -' ' SEE I'/5-1 i =14.6 1 9. 6 W// U 664 A* . 1. -\GA -00 64, Q BA , Hlly,0/ - 1 Ex '47 Â«i-[-19 001'UP 7571 hlm-ig _ 101 L a,11__*_ 2 >< 6 e I ~ H~ 2/4, aol 31.-; 1 - 40 V \ Â»24 j co\*1 ,<Â¥/Arr\EXP 1 1-0 + 44 1,0 TE W~ 11 ~ -f- 1/64Â·'4 xlk" Fhk/Â¤EIZ. t *41-Lp,; /=8*Â·Emy f+Â«Ta-Â·*25&- 01(21'0,0 1 4 1Â«tif * Trd Pg44 4 3, 0 1 41 -0110,6, 1 1 * 1.54'' 0 . ~ 41-12' CP/Â»1 -- P- 1 - 7 i,Yperr 4-rrpoeiz: ' - 1-12- 2161 4-12$12 U 410 111 Wj\4-444\BA , 4411.4 122 TllÂ· u: - !,ap& Elt - /00 n]42\- WALL -EX\61-ING ~N\Alk] 9%- 111 = 1 L 45? 11 k - , ' D. .. .'. i .. . .' I 1 1 f> 1 1 9*4 0 Blb" LCJ v .. :11111 1 / \ 0 . 4 601- Â» :ft - ti 10 1 25"e,>rw~Â®2 ' > 1 <6 9 Â· Â«Gle '3 4110, g. 1 + ' -2\, 1 15 / ---- . 11/ 21, *42164' \ 1 1Â¥f /EP\ \ lee. 6/97 1 42+N, L - F*4 411 1 e// \ 1~ lit 1: Aseâ‚¬ 2211 1 / 4 57 j 1 1, &--- au. VA!21619 4/1 + teÂ»:*112 ~ 7.- 4% ----=1 1 1 1 2.0. l.12<< 5 1 1Â» CM? 2, id \4Â»64 42 66 Ift w/1 - 3/#It gx lirr. 1444'*7 1 ~ \ Jollrr 805Â¢g- A dl 2, 4 1&:10:re ' w/108 X l ie 14,661,4 1 ' 4.04904%0 4 REF.Ace-2, SEE %7 I lVE RA, , 1 24 14 02.-1 11 lit 1-6,'4* 9 4 gee 1 1 1/ ' R 00 F PLA U - 11 1 rog- E-i-re-N-1- '12 - 829 Aâ‚¬41 ~ ~ 11 F-7 teÂ« 51/ ye w 14013. 1:rd20 614 pkNia - tee AgoÂ·+ WS:2 14*11,22. ~ . < 11 3 r 1 4 1 O 4-*L 1 1- D<' 'i---1,7, -.-1 I \:i 11< Â· A- 1 426 *r,4 1 2 <r 41/2 tEEl r- 1 11/ ~ 1-'5 8 <3 1\ X O '- 87" w/ 1, 3/4" R 1 ---4&%*4** g z 1,4'1?Cile. 14 MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Request to Replace Elli's Walls DATE: September 22, 1987 John Cottle, architect for the Elli's restoration and addition project, has requested HPC approval to rebuild new walls rather than use the existing walls as had been approved (see letter attached). Lifting off, storing on-site and reusing of the existing walls, as explained in a specific plan submitted by the applicant, was approved by the HPC as the restoration component of the project. Restoration and construction of the Elli's Addition was exempt from Growth Management competition through HPC's approval, subject to the historic preservation exemption in Section 24-11.2(b) of the Municipal Code. The Planning Office's position is that if the existing walls are not reused as approved, then this is not an historic preservation project. As a result, historic landmark designation of the structure should be rescinded, a stop-work order should be issued, and the proj ect should be subject to full GMP competi- tion. Do you agree with this position? cc: Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director -'Alâ€ž[2 Â© [2 1]%7 13 1-3 VC 1:,111 :â‚¬Ii -~~ SEP 1 6 !987 ~ i 1137 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD September 15, 1987 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Members of the Historical Preservation Committee City Hall 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear HPC Members: Re: Restoration of the existing Elli's Several important facts have recently come to my attention regarding the restoration possibilities of the existing Elli's walls. 1. The existing siding was replaced in its entirety some time in the 1960s. 2. The entirety of the trim is either new, or rotted or burned beyond use and will require replacement. 3. The building department has requested that we rebuild the wall and bring it up to current codes. In light of the above, we are requesting permission to rebuild new walls which will replicate all details of the existing walls for that portion of the project. I recommend a visit to the site to examine the existing walls; a site visit could take place either during the meeting itself or immediately preceding the meeting at 2:00. I will rely on Steve Burstein to coordinate the need and time of the site visit. Thank you for your consideration. SirÂ¢~ely. ( Â«3Â«U ~ Johh Cottle, AIA dpaftner CC: Heidi Houston Phil Holstein Gideon Kaufman, Attorney Jim Wilson, Aspen Pitkin Building Dept. HAGMAN YAW 10 August 1987 *-- ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Steve Burstein Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Steve: As we discussed late last week, I am submitting a drawing of the entry to Ellis with the proposed elimination of the front concrete steps. Presently one enters Elli's up two steps from the sidewalk and once inside, descends three steps to the main level. (The lowered floor area accomodates the second floor while remaining within the established view plane.) There are two motivating factors to eliminating these steps: 1. Handicapped access would greatly be enhanced. I have met with Tom Isaacs who indicated that it was much easier to negotiate the one step remaining than go up two and then back down three steps. 0 2. Historically, it appears that the entry wasAat grade level to the sidewalk. During demolition two additional floors were discovered below the existing floor. Why additional floors were built over the existing is unclear, although Elli Iselin has mentioned having problems with flooding each spring. It would be reasonable to speculate that early establishments rebuilt succeeding floors over the one flooded, resulting in the need to add entry steps. If this proposal is alright with you, we would also like to eliminate the one step at the middle door as well. I understand that you may want to discuss the matter with the members of HPC before signing off on this request. A response as soon as possible would greatly expedite the construction process in incorporating this entry change. Very truly yours, 1444'di Heidi Hoffmann AIA Project Manager H H: sv enclosures 4rkÂ·*/ H.ed j i-14.1-7 ut 6*11, A fer b.4 (<r~Dv'j 1 AfÂ°(,~Â°'*~"+.-unl~ ** r .,1. Ar' a.ject k Â¢6,8,4.,414,rÂ·, Ly cl,i,r,Jo' fuot, 61-1Â·0 6/Ict,/t?ULF" 14â‚¬,it Fc?,flu 6,1.. wan. fou, 4 19,1Â£f , Ifrep'ir#j 4.~0 tu~ Ij U UN 4,4 - 4 a . -~13_1 ELIMINATE CONIC F.STE STEPS 91 C.EN)01'PEN Â»4177Â©1 Ckx>AE:~ , FIQ-OPOSED ENT-rd TO ELLI'S Ski j 81 F , 92"-4. b. , .4 r ' .... r 4% . 9 u.r-â‚¬14 + E A .*.: , 1.p Â· â€¢ -- f-4-\OTO 3409%/ I h,6 CONCME-TG .57EPS --~ -'---FEE ..Â»E~~~~, u -4 ' '. j. M To: Mayor and Council Thru: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager From: Elyse Elliott, Engineering Department Date: June 2, 1987 Re: Encroachment License for Elli's of Aspen Summary: Elli's is requesting an Encroachment License for five items, Council may chose any or all of the items. Discussion: Elli's of Aspen, located on the southwest corner of Main and Mill streets, is undergoing a remodel and an expansion. they are requesting an Encroachment License for these five items: 1. Five raised planters along the Mill Street sidewalk. 2. A planter on the Main Street sidewalk that extends over their property line by 1'6". 3. An irrigation system on both sidewalks. 4. Historical encroachments on the building such as awnings, planter boxes, exterior lighting, concrete steps, parapet and overhang. 5. Subgrade footings, these would be 10' below grade and extend along the alley and the Main and Mill streets' frontages. A diagram depicting the proposed encroachments is enclosed. Recommendation: A compilation of City departments and CCLC is: 1. Raised Planters - these should not be permitted because they inhibit pedestrian flow and make snow removal more difficult. The CCLC recommends that tree grates be used in place of raised planters. 2. Large Planter on Main Street - The CCLC view this as being beneficial to Elli's in that it draws pedestrians into the store and saw no reason why it had to be placed on City property. Planning and Parks want the planter to hold two trees instead of three. 3. Irrigation System - this would insure that the plants on the right-of-way are watered and should be allowed. 4. Historical Encroachments - these are no problem as long as the applicant maintains the same area and does not increase the encroachment size. The present awnings are retractable and the Building Department recommends that they remain retractable. 5. Subgrade footings - the utility companies and the City Electric Department do not object to this. Proposed Motion: I move to grant an Encroachment License to Elli's of Aspen for items (with these provisions ) City Manager Recommendations: f r MEMORANDUM To: Planning Office * Electric Department Streets Department Building and Zoning Department CCLC From: Elyse Elliott, Engineering Department Date: May 7, 1987 Re: Encroachment License for Elli's of Aspen Enclosed is an application from Elli's of Aspen (SW corner of Mill and Main) for these encroachments: 1. Five raised planters placed diagonally along the Mill Street sidewalk. 2. A planter on the Main Street sidewalk that extends over their property line by 1'6". 3. An irrigation system on both sidewalks. 4. Historical encroachments on the building such as awnings, planter boxes, exterior lighting, concrete steps, parapet and overhangs. 5. Subgrade footings, these would be 10' below grade and extend along the alley, Main Street and Mill Street frontages. Please let me know your comments on this by May 18, 1987. .,P_ANE C2 2 - E MAIN STREET /10000') 9995' FIELD T SCALE 1 INCH= 8 FE 2 .; STORM 9:76 , 111' FL ./Cr CÂ·1/9 . gliTTFH luÂ£4 1-AN SEâ€¢EA \1/ 07 06 0 'TRAFFIC SIGNAL -k'Â· ).n~~rnâ€¢â€¢5 ~ N- CONCRET' SIDEW.L. 0 3. pryil i 1.0 9. J , 1 â€¢ (575â€¢09'i,"E~ 30.47' j 2111 2-IS VII 10 er Y 4 0 4 ' Tel Â·43: I I i - K SO 20 00' V ' f. .DAZ .....0. T- F.C /1 "- a/ + 96 11 - ED = 1:.1. - I J ELL/'S . I Gl I 1 W . : 1 STCRY 'COD FRAME [ 3 91& RA S~C> BurLDÂ·.6 .aÂ»j .-ANT.Et< i D '4**ay I - p W â‚¬ W O ' T I - 1 I 'll ., - 12 9 2 STCRY I MINER'S ,L a.9 Ai-A 9,04.-'tS. -1 ~ BUILDiNG 99 ekÂ· 61 . 9 ' . 1 - . j â€¢T. .......... I I Â· tÂ» ... 047 . BLOCK 6. 80 68 , I U) 1 4 , 444 4% . POT T ERY 1 *3 SHOP C % --Vy Â·Â· 4 6 1 .2 5 2-7 3 1, STRÂ·.13Â£.al/'1~r..Ch 0, CON F /, 1/'5009'â€žr, â€¢ 9,0 4/') / c 2 2.Dc'.C---~Fr-'2-ZX 1 7 rn 4 1. T,Â£ UNDERSIG 2.Ll_.1,11 Ti '' - TV er ELEC SPLICE MANIOLE ..D SUR.'EYED ROPER-Y LEGAL' CONC :ELD E,10Â£~CE HO D.SCREPANCLEE MAIN '99 9 E - 33Â· --Â©' ITI CONFLIC TiE*CRTÂ· S.'INVERT 1 I CR )4,6/75 DE /4 7 BANK OF ASPEN 133815 11-1 BUILDING t riC,~I AC tiÂ·,1Efi /311/9 ._./.0 .'MIS â€ž21 MEMORANDUM HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS To: City of Aspen Engineering Department U D Aspen City Council 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 From: Hagman Yaw Architects, Ltd, representing Can-Am Â» Aspen Development, Inc. Date: 6 May 1987 Re: Elli's Encroachment into the City of Aspen Right-of-Way Please consider this letter an application for an encroachment license into the City of Aspen right-of-way for the proposed expansion of the Elli's of Aspen building. The owner of the property and appli- cant is Can-Am Aspen Development, Inc. with Heidi Houston, Managing Partner (address: 135 East Cooper St., Aspen). Attached is a check for $300 with supporting documentation. The Applicant proposes to install 5 raised planters that would be 18" high by 41-6" square along Mill Street. Five new trees would be planted in the center surrounded by seasonal flowers and evergreens. In addition the Applicant proposes to locate the raised open space planter 1-6 over the north property line. With respect to the Review Criteria A through G there would be no negative impacts. (The required sidewalk minimum of 8-0 would be maintained.) According to criteria H ii) planters in the right-of-way and an irri- gation system to maintain those planters are acknowledged as a public amenity and beneficial to the City. The second encroachment license request is to grant an historical encroachment for the existing Elli's building. This encroachment includes building elements such as awnings, planter boxes, exterior lighting, concrete steps, parapet and overhangs and are noted on the survey. The last encroachment license request is to allow for the use of conventional spread footings at the foundation 10-0 below grade at those parts of the building (old and new) adjacent to the property line. Along the alley the encroachment would project no more than 1'-0" and extend for 62'-6". Along Mill Street and Main Street that same encroachment would extend 94'-0" and 31'-0" respectively. The footings encroachment is not in conflict with Review Criteria A through G. Criteria H iii) is applicable because the City generally has no interest in locating utilities, roads, etc. within 11-0" of a building at a depth of 10'-0". Thank you for your consideration of this application. MEMORANDUM TO: STEVE FROM: TOM RE: ELLI OF ASPEN DATE: April 6, 1987 Elli called me today and wanted the following information on the record for the redevelopment of the Elli building: o the level of the floor is currently two steps above grade due to the potential of flooding; any design which calls for dropping the floor below grade will result in flooding problems. o if the floor is dropped below grade and the ceiling is also dropped to accommodate a second floor, then the view through the victorian windows from the outside will be negatively effected. 0 Â¢yÂ«eÂ« ki JÂ«J 6-=tt-/ k.2 Â£~ 'r o-â‚¬t> Â· APPROVAL BY THE HISTOIRIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE OF ELLI OF ASPEN EXPANSION On March 24, 1987 the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee granted final approval of the Addition to Elli' s plans submitted subject to the condition that a detailed restoration plan for the treatment of the existing Elli's Store shall be submitted to the HPC for final review. Restoration of the existing store shall be accomplished within twenty (20) months after the certificate of occupancy is isssued for the addition. MEMORANDUM DATE: March 17, 1987 TO: ALAN RICHMAN, PLANNING OFFICE STEVE BURSTEIN FR: FRED GANNETT, ATTORNEY'S OFFICE RE: DRUEDING INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 24-3.7(D) I recently received a telephone call from John Cottle regarding Bill Drueding's updated interpretation of Section 24- 3.7(d) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Cottle stated that Hagman & Yaw modified their original proposal for Ellie's of Aspen to comply with Bill's interpretat- ion of the open space requirement. Bill, apparently, saw and approved the modified plan calling for a portion of the building to slant inward, revealing a greater portion of the open space to the rear of the building. Cottle stated the architects relied upon Bill's representat- ions of approval, and that any subsequent change would adversely affect their client's plans. I have re-reviewed that section of the code, particularly subsection (d) (1) . That portion of the code contains the clause "The minimum depth of the open space which is open to a street shall be ten (10) feet measured at right angles from the front lot line." I do not believe this mandates that the angle from the front lot line must remain at a right angle towards the rear of the building, thus prohibiting the proposed Ellie slant. Further, even if this interpretation had been historically and consistently interpreted in a similar manner in similar situations, the fact that Hagman & Yaw relied upon Bill's earlier approval begs for tolerance in this situation. Consequently, I recommend that the Hagman & Yaw be permitted to rely on Bill's earlier approval of their proposal. b 1 I f. Aspen/Pitki~ing Office 130 s~treet aspen,~ 81611 March 9, 1987 Mr. John Cottle Hagman Yaw Architects 210 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear John, In your February 27, 1987 letter you requested that the Planning Office accept your proposed open space plan for the Ellie's property. The zoning official has rejected the portion of open space that does not meet the "open to the street" criteria. We concur with this interpretation of Section 24-3.7(d). This section states "...one side...shall be open to the street and unobstructed from ground level to sky...0 We believe this means that the open space must be in the line of sight from the street in order to count. We also note that, upon examining other e recent open space interpretations, such as for the Lodge at Aspen amended GMP application and the Little Nell project, the zoning official and Planning Office have been consistent in this area. As stated in Fred Gannett's memorandum (attached), the language in Section 24-3.7(d) is rather vague; and we intend to clarify the "openness" critera as part of the code simplification effort underway. However, in absense of new language we believe we have been consistent in the interpretation of open space presently in the Code. We want to take this opportunity to remind you of another open space requirement that the space not be used for "...trash area (and) rear access area...0 It is not clear at this time that the entire space on the Ellie's property meets this requirement. Sincerely, Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director CC: Bill Drueding, Zoning Official Fred Gannett, City Attorney's Office sb.e MEMORANDUM DATE: March 5, 1987 TO: ALAN RICHMAN, PLANNING OFFICE FR: FRED GANNETT, ATTORNEY'S OFFICE RE: LETTER FROM JOHN COTTLE RE: ELLIE'S OF ASPEN I have reviewed John Cottle's letter of February 27, 1987 with regard to Bill Drueding's interpretation of Section 24- 3.7(D) of the Aspen City Code, and in particular, as it relates to the proposed plans for Ellie's of Aspen. The language of the aforementioned section is sufficiently vague so as to permit various interpretations. However, I am satisfied, after consulting with Bill Drueding and Steve Bur- stein, that the interpretation adopted by the Building Department has a factual grounding in the language of that section, and has been consistently applied in similar situations, so as to be enforceable. Further, Mr. Cottle, if he disagrees with this interpretation, has the benefit of appeal to both the Board of Adjustment and the City Council. Mr. Cottle proposed an alternative compromise, reconfiguring the open space in the general layout. Bill informed me, and asked me to pass on to you, that he was opposed to the alternative proposal for the same reasons he was opposed to the original. My concern with accepting the alternative is that it undercuts the reasoning behind rejecting the original proposal, and may be more appropriate as an appeal to the Board of Adjustments. 27 February 1987 a,1--,L.,9,,g~ ~~~~~ ~I ~ FB 27 1987 bl~~1/ HAGMAN YAW lfUL------24 ARCHITECTS Mr. Alan Richman LTD .- 210 SOUTH GALENA Planning Office ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 130 South Galena 303/925-2867 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Elli's of Aspen Dear Alan: Enclosed please find a blueprint of the floor plan for the above project, showing the proposed 2,250 sf of open space (lot size is 9,000 sf x 25% = 2,250 sf) and its layout. According to Bill Drueding's interpretation, the area hatched in red does no count towards the open space allocation because the street cannot be seen (line of sight) from that portion of the open space. The dotted line on the plan represents, in Mr. Drueding's opinion, a modification which, if the building is re- i configured, allows the street to be seen from the open space and so meets his interpretation of the code. After carefully reviewing section 24-3.7(d) of the Aspen City Code, I maintain that the continuous open space represented in our design meets every requirement of the letter of the code and i should indeed be counted. Further, there are recent examples of open space (the Mill Street Plaza) which meet the open space requirements and were approved by the Aspen Pitkin Building Department which clearly do not conform to this new "interpretation" ~ of the code. (An analogy is that a glass is open on one side only if the sides are vertical, which of course is not true; the glass is still open on one side if the top is narrower than the bottom.) I would like to propose a compromise (the Open Space Alternate enclosed), which reconfigures the open space to the general layout which Mr. Drueding desires but does not meet the "line of sight" criteria which he has added to the code. I would like you to consider a request that all of the open space shown in the open space alternate be accepted as accruing towards our open space requirements. Please contact me as soon as you have had a chance to review the matter. Thank you. Yours very truly, / \,John Cottle AIA Partner JC:sv enclosures CC: Paul Taddune w/ enc. Heidi O. Houston 1 '1 - ... 1 1--2---- --1--- 1 __-. -- 1 , 1 ./INK:1:0 NG, 2/:VE " . j i \ N\INGUO I. L.t/,7 | , r 1 1 ! i i i , \: 1 f t~i - 137391 9 - . i QDELEAC@_ALIERN*nve 6(Lt 6 OF- tâ‚¬,FEN â‚¬'27Â·e7 6'(e," . 4#*6 1%[mÂ©[EOW[*hl CITY W SPEN 130 444*i:41*reet ~ FEB 271987 6 0017Â·14 2,/&:R*Vie-J / aspen>*Â¥01#Â¢*40%31611 jA*â‚¬2020 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 27, 1987 TO: City Clerk FROM: City Attorney RE: Elli's of Aspen/Guarantee Agreement Attached for the paper monster are the original Guarantee Agreement regarding the donation and replacement of spruce trees and the letter of credit in the amount of $2,000.00 from the Bank of Aspen. PJT/mc Attachments l GUARANTEE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 26th day of February, 1987, between HEIDI O'LEARY HOUSTON ("Guarantor") and the CITY OF ASPEN, a muncipal corporation ("City") ; WITNESSETH, THAT: WHEREAS, Guarantor is the purchaser under that certain Contract dated December 19, 1986, of Lots G, H, and I, Block 80, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado; WHEREAS, Guarantor has proposed a plan for an addition to Elli's of Aspen which plan calls for the relocation of three (3) large spruce trees clustered near the North end of the property to the Aspen Golf Course; WHEREAS, Guarantor has agreed to donate said trees, together with all costs and expenses incurred in connection with their relocation, to City; and WHEREAS, City desires to be assured that trees will be replaced in the general vicinity of the site from which the above cluster of trees is being removed in the event a permit for the proposed Elli' s addition is not issued. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises hereinafter contained, parties agree as follows: 1. Guarantor has deposited a letter of credit authorizing City to draw up to $2,000.00 to be expended for the acquisition and planting of two (2) eight-foot (8') blue spruce trees with five-inch (5") caliper each at the same location as the removed trees; provided, however, if City agrees, the trees may be placed in a different location. In the event Guarantor does not obtain a Building Permit for the addition to Elli's within one (1) year from the date of this agreement, or plant the trees, the City may call upon the letter of credit described in this paragraph and replace the trees, at which time the letter of credit may be released. 2. This Agreement is binding upon the successors, representatives and assigns of the parties and is modifiable only by a writing signed by all of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and date first set forth above. Attest: CITY OF ASPEN, a Colorado municipa,1 corp5ration 17 4 7- 1 4 10(47*-il j. Ktjabi 167134 \31--- 2,1, Itthryfjff Koch,; City Cl,rk: Robett Anderson, City Manager 1 Â·, r (41,Â· , w 1,1,1' .1.Lit' & 11 , it *b, 1 I l'~4 T Al,t-9 ,~ i.l- ll.UL } (SIGNATUNES AND /ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE) -1- GUARANTOR: HEIDI O' 7 -- -- ------- /7 - By -4 y / Sam'Hodsion;'her hitorney-in-fact STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of February, 1987, by Robert Anderson, as City Manager, and Kathryn S. Koch, as City Clerk, of the City of Aspen, a Colorado municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official2seal. <th I My commission expires: C.4.44'/2('/ ; 4 Ir, 14,ll . dj : , 8 U U i. /4.- Notark Public ,J STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 26th day of February, 1987, by Sam Houston, as attorney-in-fact for HEIDI O'LEARY HOUSTON, Guarantor, on behalf of said principal. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My .cbmmission expires: -1-13- â‚¬ 5 -'/ :4 Â£ 1-a-h li)10i-~- Notary Public , guarantee agr/DOC10 -2- AL 99 rm 5-=-11. u we (Bagth 06 jspen February 26, 1987 CITY OF ASPEN Aspen, Colorado Dear Sirs: We hereby establish this irrevocable Letter of Credit #269825-01-00 for the account of Heidi O'Leary Houston in the amount of $2,000.00. This Letter of Credit is to guaranty the payment of funds up to, but not to exceed $2,000.00 payable to The City of Aspen. This Letter of Credit may be drawn upon by a draft at sight on The Bank of Aspen, 119 S. Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado. This draft must bear the statement, " Drawn Under The Bank of Aspen Letter of Credit #269825-01-00 dated February 26, 1987". The Guarantor agrees to deposit this Letter of Credit authorizing City of Aspen to daraw up to $2,000.00 to be expended for the acquistion and planting of two (2) eight foot (8') blue spruce trees with five inch (5") calipher each at the same location as the removed trees; provided however, if City agrees the trees may be replaced in a different location. In the event Guarantor does not obtain a Building Permit for the addition to Elli's with- in one (1) year from the date of this agreement, or plant the trees the City of Aspen may call upon the letter of credit as described in this paragraph and replace the trees at which time the letter of credit may be released. This Letâ‚¬Er of Credit shall expire on February 26, 1988. This Letter of Credit is confirmed by The Bank of Aspen. This credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credit (1974 Revision) International Chamber of Commerce Brochure #290. Sincerely, George9Hart Vice President GH/bm 119 Coutk JU[00 9(keet 4).0. CBOY 0 t.Aspen. CO 81612 (909) 925-2500 315 tlmÂ©Â®0%fig -* â‚¬ - Â» 1 \:2= 23 February 1987 FEB 2 4 1987 i 'i------, HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD Elyse Elliot ' 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, C0L0RAD081611 Project Engineer 303/925-2867 City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Elyse: This letter is to sum up briefly what was covered at the CCLC meeting on Wednesday, February 18, pertaining to the proposed Landscape Plan for the Addition to Ellis. The comments as to specific tree types and location were appro- priate. The discussion and concern with snowmelting and drainage will be resolved satisfactorily, as the project evolves into more detail. Overall, I believe the project was well received by CCLC and in this manner was preliminarily accepted. If this is not true, please let me know. At this time, I would like to schedule another meeting with CCLC - say March 25 to review our more final plans. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, 46,2 Heidi H. Hoffmann AIA Project Manager HHH:sv CC: Steve Burstein , I *_2.4/A =mr-=F - ofi~ ,&9,1 4 2-1 7-2 7 61 8 f c Recommended Conditions for Approval for Ellie's Expansion February 17, 1987 Planning Office Recommendation: The Planning Office believes that preliminary approval for Ellie's expansion is highly appropriate at this time. The information submitted so far is adequate for preliminary approval but not detailed enough for final approval. Additionally, we anticipate further modification and refinement of the architecture and site design. Staff recommends preliminary approval of the Ellie's restoration and expansion proposal subject to the following conditions: r--1. The/applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the 694 Engineering and Planning Office that the addition will not elicroach in the Main Street Viewplane. L The applicant must leave the two existing trees in the - southwest corner of the property, move and replant the cluster of three trees west of Ellie's at the golf course to the satisfaction of the Golf Course Superintendent, and plant new trees as required by the Park and Building Departments as arranged prior to final HPC approval. 3. The Main and Mill Street streetscape features must be approved by CCLC prior to final HPC approval. 4. Changes to the structures's location due to open space reconfiguration and/or CCLC's comments must be brought back to HPC prior to final HPC approval. 5. The following architectural elements shall be changed and represented at final plan submittal: 12#01-,-h 1.1 Ad, 6 N#B a) No entrance shall be made into the western wall of Ellie's toward Main Street and the wall shall remain undisturbed. b) Storefront features including a kickplate dimension c} s.}lall be detailed. D 14)740#'/ 1 fv\+L sh 4 6. Detailed elevations and description of materials shall be submitted for the new development at final HPC review. 7. Any changes to the proposed building materials, scale of materials, massing, bulk, and location of the addition shall be explained at final HPC review, and may be grounds for HPC denial or conditional approval at final review. 8. A detailed restoration plan for the treatment of the existing Ellie's store shall be submitted to the HPC for final review. No certificate of occupancy shall be issuedh~ for the addition until Ellie's restoration~ is completed. Opl In 1% rho 211 3 4 C , 1 0-3 2-1 9. Individual historic designation of the structure must be achieved prior to issuance of a building permit for the addition. sb.48 b 4Â» 410 Ar/Al ill 11 6 r# if ~ viu c -4/5 p or~Â».4 lu /11 0:11 4 , 118-03 Conditions for Approval for Ellie's Expansion February 17, 1987 1.. The Main and Mill Street streetscape features must be approved by CCLC prior to final HPC approval. 2. Changes to the structures's location due to open space reconfiguration and/or CCLC's comments must be brought back to HPC prior to final HPC approval. 3. The following architectural elements shall be changed and represented at final plan submittal: a) The proposed entrance into the western wall of Ellie's toward Main Street requiring additional removal of material shall be further studied. b) Storefront features including a kickplate dimension shall be detailed. c) The proposed stairtower shall be further studied. 4. Detailed elevations and description of materials shall be submitted for the new development at final HPC review. 5. Any changes to the proposed building materials, scale of materials, massing, bulk, and location of the addition shall be explained at final HPC review, and may be grounds for HPC denial or conditional approval at final review. 6. A detailed restoration plan for the treatment of the existing Ellie's store shall be submitted to the HPC for final review. Restoration of the existing store shall be accomplished within eighteen (18) months after the certifi- cate of occupancy is issued fortthe-addition. 2. Ont,rri 3 7. Individual historic designation of the structure must be achieved prior to issuance of a building permit for the addition. sb.48 ' ,Gobp#wal tflitg_f~0~n';o+N-P-6-449Â«*-*IN.#1'4_j b: Hrz Fâ€¢*4 6 , 0 . p. 0 R. . L 1 1 ki 21 f Ab4 L 941' i A ALr-*, /11 14,1 t!**EN. t H PC ~t u.Awd E 1145 [4, AA>)/4 174 ~401/% 11,1,3 ? . F & Mi w# F j -1.~ d, j k#* R Â¢414 4 4 w.p J\44 --- f Ed/U,4,13 Â® 1417 t, 0,44 9(4 7*9.t. 4 FA,5 jo #fc tu*111*J f fdni,Â·s 17;31-1 6. < tkli A rv* . TL Full; 61,w Eli'ea q.;01 mi 2\ ta 11* 4411 klifig< /7, 1439.AM+~403* - 1--- - ,f 61,4.*1 -4 3 -4. Â»9 D JuÂ§ *mUnl ; Rf C 04<at, a , (4 - - - 3-il _052i& 1 **J l<i*,5 461*fA 4 JÂ·kU wwol ttlit ~jw# V (11 AlÂ» 74 .44 0, â€¢tr'Â»1 pr~ 10 4 <'"'in) 1 '"'7 Luillij Jult . 11 I 4 (71 <46 10.-4, W kÂ£7% 4 14U- 4 24' 1 fÂ«t t G 44 4 CUL'-44Â¥i~*AJAA K VIG* ST. I~ 46,4 #712)-ilfj--3 2 Jl' 5114) 414?, erl (4) uje q wn,04, ,ejOle _ ULL + w,~.8.4 1,3 4 1*& C 1- 4-MA to tk Luij !04; J +4 Al/U 1 41- 13 4 44 , *Be#92~ 40 8Â¢c NA olÂ»,4 4144 uk 00%7 - 1.3.1 A * Al. re' J ju& ti e.14* f tk Apo (o# hfl' i 4.44 64.i* 1.1. 6, 144 J. RApll L 2+13 tk1 24 47<0nt't I.A.~ _-_~ h 6~r--Â¢ st,In) s,C-6 .hi*,44. '40;* pod d f Â¢ Urow - -.'I----- - - pM-- 1,=av - M -1/ a/bu~lu 14+ 9.in) 4 9 6 oUU *tal 440 lu''A Zi fuM( Le# a.0/ Jr M JJ *Wh 44 +02 . YÂ»Â·*3 -U 4 m m.1,1 C , -In 01)Â·voivAl Oejil,jk .. GL J 44 Jttclwd APW A,~~U 4 el~.1 rl,6 _ ~ AJ. 6 MP L,L<*M P.reG - 4&wjN 311~â„¢, 0 rud t.3Â» 14 svEA r,J// L 5,1 [on & f ~t- Â· ~ z ) lit-) i A. 0~~4 - B 446 412 1 0Â·AL CJ rh 1 -- 1 * 06 CA 4 YFI"2 ) 4 M.t~(IN , 444 4 68 L MA4 U 4 1- 06 1176 0.4 f.)-r M,An#p,W 44/&*.4 G *42# if 44 Fd'%1343 -7 714<- N/k,4 j 1, Viâ‚¬ awp"M : 11 4~Ju.4/- mi,;t 4.Â®~~g,twt -4 1Â£ ~4.0#~lw Â¢-4 947*14,4 ,+1 f 44 Off) a. 112 4, JA*4 21 4 *MA,Fl 4 11 04 +J vkv9Lan - 3 , f yh.3 7L* ,Â·4 2/1,rj Â§14 0 +UL, 9 11 4tf,~65 Alof /u,ta~k ti rÂ»-101 4 Al 44 0*10 0 8v,IM4. 09~Aj r'' 4 AU}W'D , 4 ovt, 64.4 1 Â· 96*J /4~1 UAÂ£ 6 JU 4 fAL; 0 7*4j 10 *w* Â»4 2 1+ ~jdl 6, r[L rrJA te L jL -j; f~ 0; 4, l1 -- r- 1,46.1 U#* 4 K fwt<6 ' Adit tlud:,1 #u ;4*2'0. e.#CA/LU,di -0 - 4 - Mi t. tk, 84 6/ 1 4*fÂ·Â·Â·~34 94 54 VIS-4 6'Min-Â£24.1. A 44 5464 0,4 flte S 1147(*A 41#4 4 '411 3(131 1 4 9?142 6114.0, 444 edÂ»401) f 'wal,b Al- 1 v A Lf n twril wo\ L UL AMGAU. wj)0 MA 9.0 f O *1 44 * &41 1,4.r;e ti~ 4 #4, W . ell f * + , uÂ»M 41 +L- 12024 Pt p oil * '7Â£* 4 lk. * 41 *6 ) ~j/0 4 Rfc , +L. 424* am1v~1*1* - %4 44 ftÂ·.,ft gil 12#9 n tA Mi l 1 J-} f~rrt tr* &+L'nti 4 h U *A#* f i m An 4 AUU.,1.PPER*C#~ 16, /4 U'A- 67 01/4 wri frÂ»4â€¢AU (4 '46 0j JA~ # - 04 4 4 0-*1 U.J U- 4. 4 01 crl .1 1.- Ak Rk# A. Â»~~~j yU, Affd~~~ 6v.,11*jf w,1 0 k,0 88* 4 9% 1,A ' ZL ~44.g. 461 RA 4 4- 2 6 4,-All cl L C ( 4rv,UN U] W Url*1 61-1 j . 9, ,#FIM,atmA o x/,4 Gl J.22-, 2 71 ,Â»re'j rru~ ofvu L.0 87 ,.12,6 4. Â£141,6, 4 19 90 "fIJ Â°rÂ· Â°r'.i vu44 t, -4.z 04~ D{ fic; al , Dy 4 wu,*9 4 04{44 W A'J/1 u-4 4 [I fr. A I i + 1 l-1fnd 1, _ tY rck,Tv. i vt ,Â¢l , A . f,44ul. 2 2 4. .LAti- 6 VIME,5 . 9,4 4'tlt, odn.4/ . r-4,3 /ill -7 K Jk .7 4 -4*0 Â· 1 Â·mia U j. 24*4 KN A . 84, 31*1 fwil 4-14 0444 2/4 4 &Â«,rf#,/\2,0,4, 4,04~"J -uhtit -- AN __ A A JA , 04-2.f =631 ~1 04 221 a Â·, . At' 0 Â»AL Juk Ji 6 6~f 4 4 H re r~ 1 D ~24*n, -- -- h Cifit) â€žjau*o ~,L i -11 JU/44 -6 -9-1 , 416 -1.1 H Â«0?J 34 &4.2 ~49.U Ap MLLA /6 +4 21044 414 6 MW J Ldl % iolli@6 7 61IX,4 W D uÂ»13 4 4 Lf~% A *&4 %p 11Â·L f A+A +L 4/. A I<i,k~1~14 j~~'~~,0,0,~A w.11 li,Â»+ Tp~,1 6 0,1-f,- v~~w VJ .Ilkut #4 dAA *k 24 -AA 4 M J, 41 mw.1 61,0 01 8 A xt . 16&18 C. tht<4hp 91 94 2 4 Â·' 1 rr~ -oU, 2.1 7- MÂ»1 { .B 4 -ij Â» 140. der#L J JA &44 $#l4] (*A 1 44 ki,4,1 40 11 f 111 -~~L t tl. dl Â£1] Fr~Â·.7Â· El- p_ A, bf' uhI~j:32-- ul,JAU4 4,- i -4.... A Jaud#E A.V. 1/ . Â·4ipil 9.---I-- PUR; Uff\R ftÂ».224: 11 f 6,4, D-(lk LAU,fU rituu~ MA * 2 IIi,1 c-9 f 40,;* 0 Ait; Â¥rrqd J-AL inc , 4 i,,pc4, 5,l~+U u i i 0,16,1 p '4,4Â»v% 0#"-/ *,t.d *41/-6#tgf~Pt ftnj 4444 A-ped. 4 4*244 1 M 4 04%106 .1 *al K OIL w aol 4: 414 ~4Â»,4 rU.> c.re,0.1 4 1 l'\64 AAL. U â‚¬*f 141,Â»rj 41 6 4 MLA tw*LU -' _ \ 1 14 40 4 624 1.-4 J.*U 1 4 61Â£*ubl W f Lvvi4 66* 114 1, dlk*6~<'- W cK,N,2 A -Ii Â¥1451.vilwfla,i. 2.1 +1 .2~449** 6-4,tâ€¢ 44 44 k 1 24.j c-Â· 1)4 erl P ~ra k,H *J "fty tk &1 4 161 h. 44 0116. 6 24;44Â» 14*G (266 5â‚¬60*44W, w #ui'jt, 0% 49#4 4 fy;*tifikj ?**lf.J. J *bplj- Ne Aw -4Â£6 u *rjj 4 * 41 D.â€ž4+1. 5. 11. 144. .4 M,\\st, d~al-cwr ~4* 46,1 6. .ff,â€žIly (Ill,i~n tor,kil 816*,r"L 4 - (1â€ž,1 -iL Ajar.,5 4634., jvâ‚¬ED wix# 0~f~ 1* *-- 041 jn CLL 62 .4 =J k Y tr.1 46Kf<- rA f.t J Aft â€¢frl 1 12 - -5 - 4 KtÂ« o~UU ji.,4 4,1 k dv,1 U fA 2 W f'a 512* : A/, ellir,piA it.# 6 ,44 2 ,~Ifulir-=A ej<3307 fL 61 J< Â£1116 24#J Megi AYAr 2,1, *1 - (64 #fyg 51-A~,1 -feAL<s 'j,Â£\4~ 4 1(Ily r\At, 1,#.A,)4* 013 4 ak, WY& Fl tiw fa +L-edivt "w k.il,pn#j J ful % R N,~sinâ€žl,jÂ¥,04 I,cld.4 4 31 All,it'A ,40 k A My ,1..y' t, th- but\Iin~ h44,1'~. 1<o,4 It, 4'NI'.'19' 6, U fi â€¢*1 4 f< 4#,fle , 64 Aâ€¢9 6- 1"'a-fA II i'Â£ de.i.1 4 eâ€¢JAw , "*.. +4 Â£010~-- $ Ly-*t--i*ik6.Jit--_a_-6#L*,.vâ€ž1,444.41.=9==6=2-7 ---7 1 tf(,9,1 24.ri*f~A ti#r&~)* exi,ty El ji,15},RifiILEAV,ffty 42Â£+ f *a740/7 A.V k Mi,J f,rlk All.4;4 wd.'1 84,60â€¢001-4 cbâ€¢f'~ . - 9. I.UJ 11,+/ll''C 4 4 druu dju,J l, JuU r- -[o fltEE*~461 14'U4hk { 4 LVI'lin) r~dÂ· f.+L J.1,1,4 - LE Â© M 0 9 E %41 CITY,~01*WPEN A FEB I 0m87 130 so~alena-Street aspeni/010*aÂ¢2'81611 To: Bill Drueding FROM: Bill Ness, Parks Superintendent THRU Darin Brasch, Parks Supervisor DATE: February 16. 1987 Afl. Elli Tree Removal Bill Drueding, It is our understanding that the owner of the parcel adjacent to Elli's of Aspen will relocate a cluster of three (3) large Spruce trees ( 16" outside diameter) to the Aspen Golf Course at their expense. Section 13-76 (D)(5) of the Municipal Code states that the Parks Superintendent should consider the contribution of the trees to the natural beauty of the area. We feel that the existing trees do contribute a great deal to the greenery of Main Street and that their removal negatively affects the natural streetscape To compensate for this loss, the applicant must replace the present trees on the site with half the present number ( 11). It is in agreement (per meeting with the Hagman Yaw Architects February 12,1987) that two of the eleven Spruce trees will remain on the property in their present position (southwest corner of property). The other Spruce trees removed will be replaced with four deciduous (Silver Maple with a minimum caliper of 3") in the proposed positions (per conceptual landscape plan, February 12,1967). It is our recommendation that small pine trees (no more than 3" caliper) or mugho pines be used in the landscape of the area adjacent to the Miners Building. Spruce trees are not recommended because of their growth potential. I f these terms are acceptable with the owner of the parcel next to Elli's of Aspen, the Parks Superintendent approves with this arrangement. Darin Brasch 9- Parks Supervisor PE@-my- ..7 BE',~ * l FEB 1 3 1987 J 13 February 1987 HAGMAN YAW Lt=I3 ARCHITECTS I LID 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 Members of the Historical 303/925-2867 Preservation Committee City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Addition to Elli's of Aspen Dear Members: Prior to the upcoming meeting on February 17th, Steve Burstein has asked me to address the techniques to be used in the restoration of the existing Elli's structure. It is intended at this time that the Mill and Main Street facades of Elli's will be retained in their entirety with all existing materials to remain in place. Existing wood siding and trim will be cleaned, patched, reprimed and repainted. Areas or elements which have deteriorated beyond repair will be replaced with materials and finishes which match the original. The existing roof structure does not meet present day code require- ments for snow loading; therefore it will have to be replaced in its entirety to bring it into compliance with the current Uniform Building Code Requirements. The new roof will tie into the existing Elli's wall below the top of the existing parapet. Currently, no foundation exists under significant portions of the existing exterior walls. Because a continuous foundation will be required for the new construction, it appears at this time that the exterior walls may have to be moved temporarily for the construction of new foundation walls. When the new foundation walls are con- structed, the original walls can then be replaced in their original position. Project construction will be staged in either a single phase or in two phases, dependent upon occupancy of the existing building. A detailed plan of construction methods, sequence and presentation of any possible replacement elements will be presented to the HPC in the first weeks of April, 1987. Thank you. Yours very truly, n Cottle AIA Partner JC:sv ~Mli1111111111111111111111 4- 6 AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Special Meeting February 17, 1987 (Rescheduled from February 10, 1987) 2:30 p.m. City Council Chambers I. Old Business A. Public Hearing: Ellie's of Aspen Addition, 101 South Mill Street (Tabled from February 10, 1987) John Cottle, Heidi O'Leary Houston B. Preliminary Review: (Reapplication) Aspen T-Shirt Company Awning, 407 East Hyman Avenue 1 Tom Bosseli C. Minor Amendment: Pitkin Center Windows, 520 East Hyman Kim Weil , II. New Business A. Preliminary Review: Reconstruction of the Shaft, 534 East Cooper Avenue Kim Weil III. Special Projects A. Finalize Historic Evaluation of 423 North Second Street and old house on A.C.E.S property Ii) Dele+Avd #61 4,1 0*2, 11261:,t- 3 #ji,4~â€¢w --v (1 5,jf,tje,ir(r,til 9) (*j tvolt' ~le:.1(4 (T,U 4) Â·- 570 4'11 l 3) :/f w. 844 10. (UL/ 3) - A /1.n 5,&1 J . - Em-2 m 8 77 'H- MI HPC 2-17-87 Agenda 1! I Ill 1 . Ill,Jry- - /111 :i . . ITEM I.A. iIi i FBB I 0 1-387 M I i H :; i 1 1, <61 : 1:' 10 February 1987 - 1 U.9 i HAGMAN YAW . t 1. ARCHI 1-IECTS 1.1 t) 2 10 SOUT1 I GALENA ASi'EN. COLORAI )0 81(~I I Members of the Historical 303/915-2867 Preservation Committee City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Addition to Elli's Dear HPC Member: Conceptually, the additions to Elli's remain essentially as previously presented to HPC on January 13, 1987; the addition wraps around the existing building and is therefore broken into two separate and distinct building fronts which, together with Elli's, form a family of wooden buildings. The primary exterior material is wood channel lap siding (as presently exists on Elli's) with wood trim, wood windows and wood columns. Time permitting, proposed color schemes for the additions will be presented at the upcoming meeting. The existing trees on the site v,ill be handled as follows: The major clump of three trees will be relocated at the golf course, and two of the existing trees at the south property line will be retained. Although the remainder of the trees will be removed, replacement trees will be provided as directed by the Parks Department. This solution was reached after two weeks of working with the Par!<s Department and a detailed , landscaping plan will be presented at the meeting. The open space requirements of the City of Aspen have been met and a letter to that effect will be presented at the meeting. Several planted areas occur in the open space, both in the pedestrian accessway and in the courtyard at the front of the property. Relative to a sidewalk elevation of 99.1 feet at the front of Ellis store, the Main Street view plane begins at an elevation of 117.2 feet at the Main Street property line and continues to an elevation of 133'-0" at the south property line (as described in the improvement survey by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated January 1, 1987). The additions will not intrude into this view plane. We a re anticipating at this time that the existing exterior walls will be left essentially intact after the required shoring, straightening and reinforcing is put into place. There presently exists approximately 4,026 sq. ft. on the site; the proposed addition will add 3,121 sq. ft. on the ground level and 4,924 sq. ft. on the second level. Â·4 9/0455,f MA410-71 ji L ,31FAR [_etter to Members of the Historical Preservation Committee 10 February 1987 Page Two In conclusion, we have worked hard since the first meeting to address the main issues raised at the preliminary level and solve the problems by adding on to a historical. structure on a confined site. We hope that you feel the resolution has been successful. Thank you. Yours very truly, Hagman Yaw Architects, Ltd I..'-f j. 6 \!,en Cottle AIA Partner JC:sv A . f "r CITY -OF#ASPEN - 130 south:galen a.4 street + I. I ' & ' - ' '.. - 7 2610 f.4 d o~:r81611 [Ii Â© [P, 11%7 [3 9 aspen, b:Â·..!9-:--1&73;le'~3 --- tÂ· te, 9 1987 ;:i , I i To- Bill Drueding .. 1 . t - FROM: Bill Ness. Parks Superiniendent L___ - , 7-11 rIT- ' - 1 il l'i i. Darin Lirasch, Parks bl:perviscir DATE Februar\+ 5. 198 RE. Fl I i T,-pe. i.)+.. m in-:i ! uill L L V V r,Â·iâ€¢ r.. DIll t)1 2:eltlf)*.. h is our Unders:C::ding thar the owner :tf the parcel adjaceill i': c!11 s of \Spen wiIi rch>edie a Liusler of i. hi'ee 1.11 large Spruce :i-ees 1 10 ..331.2:Je diaineter j to the Aspen 60!1- Course at their expense. Section 13-76 i D" 5 j of the Municipal Code st:iles that the Parks f >Upei-lilleillien't should C..nsidel- 113.3 Coniributic)!1 01 the Lfees tt-, the ilatural -heautr (.11 the area. We feet tilai the exiSling treey lic Contribuie a greal de.:i to the greenery of Main Areel and iii.it their remo'al ne.gatively aflects the natural streetscape t To compensate for this ]OSS, the applicant must replace the present trees on the Site with haif the present number ill) of nursery stock IS in height or larger I thai will be visible on Main Sireet and/or Mill Sireet- If these terms are acceptable with the owner of the parcei nell to Elli*s of Aspen, the Parks >upet-imendÂ¢Rt apt)~ves with this arram<ement. tlfu- IYarin Brasch Parks Supervisor HPC 2-17-87 Agenda - ------ ITEM I.B. ~_ r. i kn.7 LE: l: \..Â·' , :-i, i 2% \ ' -- t~ E (0. P n (1 0 17-7 IN ! Since 1899 ~41 5 # + A Â»45931â‚¬lt ajoiyzj :~ DbytioutiÂ® Ii\| #N 7 987 I 'lii .; it: 1 1 109 1 it:Jj! MANUFACTURER OF FABRIC AND METAL PRODUCTS January 5, 1987 Steve Burstein Aspen Planning Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Steve, This is a letter of application to install an awning on the Aspen T-Shirt Company located at 407 E. Hyman Ave. Enclosed please find (3) sets of shop drawings indicating the shape, dimensions and location of the proposed awning ( I believe you already have a picture of the site which I submitted with the last application). Basically, the awning is to have the same width as the existing storefront, it is to have a standard shed shape (45 degree pitch) with a valance in front and on both ends to provide space for the lettering, and it is to be mounted approximately 6" up onto the existing wood facade on the building providing a ground clearance of approximately 8'-0. The fabric is to be Castilion 9517 forest green (see enclosed sample). The letters are to be 8" tall block style and cut out and sewn on the vertical ; valance to read: ASPEN T-SHIRT COMPANY (white letters). The frame is to be fully welded 3/4" square steel tubing painted to match the color of the backside of the fabric. Please let me know if you have any questions. The owner of the store (Tom Boselli) will plan to be at the HE>C meeting at 1: 00 pm. in the City Council Chambers on 1/13/87. Yours truly, _ -i hr- 1 l Lane Bertrand COLORADO CANVAS AWNING Co., INC. 3990 South Windermere, Englewood, Colorado 80110 â€¢ (3031 789-0533 1 r - 1 â€¢ i lilli $ 1 d: : i i ////2, i i 1 i I I i 12wlr . : iÂ·i FAgecr. A+Jb_#Lâ‚¬h Â©t#-U- .:.. ........,-- -- /....... ........................ . . .1 ...6 ........'.. ..........1.......... :...... .r.................. -/.-I-- I. ......... .--/----.r---- .-- --I... - . ! i i i 69 6171, v o U.f Al,N Â«\A J 6.- TRA C. IC. : . ....-........... ..I#..... -.. I *. i. *I.-- pop 2,4 ate.6 76 -05 40/raÂ·C : : t i 1 ! . ; 1-UE IN * f#*Â¢â€¢E,- ~ 4 . ...... .-1. . +.. . I . L. ,/ . ..... .. 1 : i ? i ' 1 ; i.i .: tÂ· Â·tÂ·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·rÂ· â€ži 1 -- ,- ..... 2... .....1......-â€ž'.-..... . :.--.t....... .... ......1.-- 1- ... ' I'l #... -I-I .... i i 1 bpril . ! â€¢1 i . ./ . ......... -I 126 , i i 1 , CC \ \\ 1 i ' il : \4 i ./.- 1 916-er- flocAL Soffil- 1 - 7 // \ 1 1 2- V /3 * 1 P i i 1 1 e : .p =-:" 9 .. 0..... ... 4. It : - >11 J - = 1 i i E i. - . 1 , t> il j 11 : : : f \ .2Â· i $< fAy:FIC. CAST,LiDA) 95-17 Â¢6 ok &4. 0* , , 1-G /i / 1; .: i.-- . . /1// i i.Â· ........ ...... , .......-+...A---.....4.- .....- - 1. ....... .- -- I --.......... -4 - I : 1 i 4/ 1 U./ r rd %4 L. TvE"JO- ---3.- 1 f -I-. 4 . : . . : . / . ................ ..... '.-I . -' -I li.--I , I......7---I--.....'.-+....... F#hAE (A-u_ wcilÂ·Ez>j : 1 i i â€žf.... ..... . . ...- .....-,-I -- ..7... ..4--".......; I FI LETTE-M- L, :- r CER-kie.Â¢.D 161/4-672..rvt j iÂ· 1 . i Â· i .....-e.. -........+â€ž.-*.....-- ..............i. ......1 3/ : r )/.Bi) zz> i--- i i /- 3 --- Ed 4 T.-i ST' L: ST-Â¢A p. -749 ipockET- : 2 1 FizA,t,-4 VE-A-1104-\-f: I.,// i.-Li ''1 C, 7--i. flu O 1,3 FA 32-! C AMb Sc. R.Exp E D INTÂ© 13*015-31Â£>C- 1\ 0-12-91% 1 ~AL)*04-'44.Y.. L.fu7.7*l-4, iÂ¢F Â¢{14.6 1 : ~ Z :i ; : : E Â· : : 2- . â€¢ i Â· 1 : : i i 1.-i'i : ~ , 1301-M [fro-as Of- Ap)*te *_lit>..4-26- Â·Â·i Cov FJUSA 73* ~ Fle kic-F 1 Iii /1 ' Â·/ -:. -*.- ... - W. */ ... -Â·Â·Â· I.Â·Â·Â· ............. ..-C . --- ----1.-,--.---4- -- . -4-...-- - -,--,-â€ž- :. t.i Â·Â·:!'; i iii : , 1:;til.i . i ...'........ -r .--4-- ~ I :..,----- I . --I.--. .- - .-- ..... - 1 : . .Â· U Â· Â· 1! t ! : i Ii:iii i : 1 4 t ! i i i Â¤ i ; i f i i i i : i . !Â·i ; : i, , Â· i i I :! ti i ! lili , i i ! i S ' i i 1 iii 1 1 i 1 : ~ i i 1 1 : 1 : i . : 1 ! ! i 1!'11 I 1 1 . 1 . . I Â¢ I . 1 1 1 1 Â·Â· i' , : 1 1 1 Nka 1 . ! ! -ft4 ~ 4~-, 1 1 ! i I JOB NAME A-spE,J T- 5 1.1 \An- Co 1 : 1 ... JOB ADDRESS 1131 . 1 /1 1 i , ii 1 1 1 i CONTACT !! 1.1 1 SALESMAN PHONE 1 iÂ· . Â·Â·tÂ·. I Â·. i i. tÂ· .... .Â· .... Â·Â·Â·/Â· ... 4 .... - .... ...... ........+V-I - ......... ,1 r.. $ .2:,Jock ~ST Â¥ LE - C oD M i m- ~ ZJ -nr VÂ· d *.--- 19-0,/2/ ..~ Â·Â·Â· 1 : 1 ----0-- - ..+7.. . __. i .i. â€ž....._ poeftÂ·-~ . ---Â¢600,1 d CA-21-1 i_l o/J .9.211 Fo (LF-ST- -04urf' i ...... â€žhtâ€žâ€ž ./ 1 1 i i i,1 t 1 t . 4 . t i i . 1 lilli 4-.I- *. - -I.- - - -.-V----/ M. I. M/Â· Â· ...4 .. ....1........ . ..' . ... ...... . h . . ... ... .4. --.-T . ....... . ' Ell ':illi 'li i .- : tiii: ..... i * i l iii e ! : :iii ! @mes@ 359000% â‚¬(9 4 i (2Â®049(9(11(9 0 :1:i I : ' U : P u UWJOB NAME ~ 6(>~-A) 7~ .5/~'EF C'-<371 1/4.-/wit .:!:i :i i i . i : r .:, JOB ADDRESS , i i 4 .. . .. ... .Al - . '......+., . ..... ....... .... ..... - .-9.â€ž.% ...... .. CONTACT 2, f , i , : SALESMAN PHONE -- .-1 .1-. * --- p.. r---- .. HPC 2-17-87 Agenda ' 1[R'12-*-.Â®(117 121Ril ITEM II.A 11 01 - 71/lil APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITr EE RE, 1EW lilli FEB r 2 1//-â€¢ ill il j iUL1~__~~h' :116 1.1 2--I......--/f...-5 A. Name of Applicant: Kim Neil: Bill Foss and Associates i J B. Authorization by owner for Representative to Submit Appli- cation: Letter Attached. C. Name and Location of Property: 534 East Cooper Avenue ~ Northwest Corner of Cooper and Hunter D. Description of Proposal: Conceptual Design for Preliminary Approval of new building to replace existing building. E. List elevation plans, site planr detail drawings, historic photographs, .current photographs, etc. which are being submitted with this application: Plans and elevations, site plan and photographs of adjacent buildings. P. Building Materials: Sandstone veneer and steel and glass storefronts with canvas awnings. 0 G. Colors: Colorado Rose for Sandstone. H. Illumination: Signage: J. Effect of the proposal on the original design and architectural elements: Ii/A K. Identify encroachment licenses or other City approvals needed by applicant: N/A .. t. 2. f i ' JAN 28 I987 1 11 '1 9 U \ i[ January 20, 1987 Historic Preservation Committee City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Individual Historic Designation for Structure at 101 South Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado currently known as Elli's of Aspen Ladies and Gentlemen: SVEA Partnership, as the record owner of the referenced structure, has entered into a contract dated December 19, 1986, for its sale to Heidi O'Leary Houston. Wishing to comply with said contract purchaser's desire to obtain historic designation, the undersigned does hereby consent to the individual designation of their building as Historic on the condition that the sale of said property to said purchaser be completed. Naturally, your cooperation in implementing this provisional Historic Designation is greatly appreciated. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Very truly yours, SVEA Partnership By - -- -1 7-L- Ingrid 6Stuebner, General Partner j 2 4 0- 1 0-5 -3 GUARANTEE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of February, 1987, between HEIDI O'LEARY IiOUSTON ("Guarantor") and the CITY OF ASPEN, a muncipal corporation ("City"); WITNESSETH, THAT: WHEREAS, Guarantor has proposed a plan for an addition to Elli' s of Aspen which plan calls for the relocation of three (3) large spruce trees clustered near the North end of the property to the Aspen Golf Course; WHEREAS, Guarantor has agreed to donate said trees, together with all costs and expenses incurred in connection with their relocation, to City; and WHEREAS, City desires to be assured that trees will be replaced in the general vicinity of the site from which the above cluster of trees is being removed. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises hereinafter contained, parties agree as follows: 1. Guarantor agrees to deposit a letter of credit authorizing City to draw up to $2,000.00 to be expended for the acquisition and planting of two (2) eight-foot (8') blue spruce trees with five-inch (5") caliper each in a location on the lot adjoining Elli's of Aspen to be agreed upon by City and Guarantor to replace those which are being relocated to the Aspen Golf Course. In the event Guarantor does not obtain a Building Permit for the addition to Elli's within one (1) year from the date of this agreement, or plant the trees the City may call upon the letter of credit described in this paragraph. 2. This Agreement is binding upon the successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties and is modifiable only by a writing signed by all of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and date first set forth above. Attest: CITY OF ASPEN, a Colorado municipal corporation By Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk Robert Anderson, City Manager (SIGNATURES AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE) GUARANTOR: HEIDI O'LEARY HOUSTON By her attorney-in-fact STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of February, 1987, by Robert Anderson, as City Manager, and Kathryn S. Koch, as City Clerk, of the City of Aspen, a Colorado municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of February, 1987, by , as attorney-in-fact for HEIDI O'LEARY HOUSTON, Guarantor, on behalf of said principal. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public guarantee agr/DOC10 ,. MEMO TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE FROM: STEVE BURSTEIN DATE: JANUARY 9, 1987 RE: ELLI'S STORE ADDITION Because the Elli's store addition is a very important project the planning office has prepared a memorandum. The applicant is requesting HPC's preliminary review of a proposed addition to Elli's store. The expansion would not be subject to competition in the Growth Management Quota System if Elli's received individual historic designation. Therefore there would be no P&Z or Council review; only HPC must give approval. At the present time, this building does not possess individual designation and is being considered along with other undesignated structures on the Inventory. The present owners have not yet joined the applicant in requesting individual designation. Staff views this project to be very important in terms of (a) restoration of an historic commercial building,(b) compatibility of the addition with the commercial core historic district,and (c)visual and land use impacts on Main Street. This preliminary review should help the applicant understand the HPC's general priorities and standards to be applied to the development of this property. Staff recommends that the committee deals with the proposal in a general way and should not feel compelled to give any approvals at this first meeting. Following are some conceptual issues that might be discussed, and that we have included for the applican'st benefit for future submittals: 1. Is the general approach of adding on to Elli's Main Street and Mill Street elevations, surrounding the historic building and its first and second additions, acceptable in terms of compatible massing? 2. The Mill Street facade of the addition is basically on the property line, maintaining the existing edge along the sidewalk.The Main Street facade is stepped back in four sections, creatj.ng a small courtyard. The design generally maintains a strong vertical edge on both streets. Do you find this approach more appropriate than providing usable open space such as characterized by the court yard design? As we know,some commercial courtyards in Aspen have not worked well. Does this design feature reinforce the pedestrian character of the block? -- .... 3. Is the 25% open space required in the CC zone district being provided? 4. Does the segmented Main Street facade create appropriate proportions of massing along the approximately 48 foot long storefront? - 5. Do you believe that cutting down the three evergreen trees west of Elli's is a loss of a major existing streetscape amenity? Should the preservation of these trees be incorporated into the building design? 6. Are there certain important landscaping features that would help achieve a pleasing transition along Main Street from residential structures to commercial c buildings? 7. The materials selected are wood,glass, and possibly concrete and steel mullions. Do you find that the materials will partially match the existing structures in a way to reinforce important historic features of Elli's? 8. What do the Mill Street elevations look like? 9. Does there appear to be too much glass on Main Street? 10. What storefront features would be appropriate on the addition? 11. How do the proportions of the two stories of the addition relate to the one story Elli's store? 12. Will the Elli's store be restored or reconstructed? 13. What is the floor area of the addition? 14. Will the view plane special review be required for the addition? Reminder: HPC will meet in the joint work session with Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission at 5 p.m. January 13. *.2.2 ~ f, 4 f Aspen/Pitkfii;flinning Office 2.-ed'Â·" ~'+0~~- 3/:AM~$ 130 sbulhrgilentstreet . aspen,~colorado 81611 January 16, 1987 Gideon Kaufman 315 E. Hyman Ave., Suite 305 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Gideon, This letter is in response to your letter to me of January 7, 1987 regarding the applicability of Section 24-11.2(b) of the Code to the expansion of Elli's. I concur with your statement that if this building is individually designated, its expansion will not require any growth management review or approval., However, there are at least two other issues which must be resolved before I concur with your statement that if the HPC approves your final plan, you can proceed to building permit application, which would obviously also include a determination of your compliance with applicable CC Zone requirements. First, you must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Engineer- ing and Planning Offices that your building will not encroach into the Main Street View Plane, which originates directly across from your building at the Hotel Jerome. I suggest that you meet with Jay Hammond to establish the procedure for addressing this question, and then provide me with a letter from Jay demonstra- ting whether or not you fall under the view plane procedures. Second, the Planning Office has already raised with you the question of whether the two large trees at the front of the property can be preserved. Under the provisions of Section 13-76 of the Code, you must obtain a permit from the Building Inspector to remove these trees. I am hereby putting you on notice that I expect you to resolve the issues included in Sections 13-76 (d) and (e) of the Code prior to processing your final approval with the HPC. I expect you to work with the Parks Director and Building Inspector to demonstrate whether: 1. The trees can be moved to another location in the City; 2. The building can be designed in such a manner as to retain the trees on site; or F 3. Comparable substitutes can be replanted on the property if the trees can neither be retained or moved, and must therefore be cut. In particular, I consider criteria (d) (5) and (6) to be relevant to the subject property and am hereby directing the Building Inspector, who is under my jurisdiction as Planning and Develop- ment Director, to work together with you and the Parks Director in applying the provisions of Section 13-76(d) and (e) to this property. In order that we can avoid unnecessary hardship or delay for your client at the time of building permit submission, it is my suggestion that you resolve this issue with staff simultaneously with your conceptual review by HPC. I advise you not to attempt to build reliance upon your plan to remove the trees simply by getting final HPC approval of the addition, since the Code specifically gives the Building Inspector and Parks Director sole authority on this matter. It is my sincere belief that we can resolve this issue to the mutual benefit of your client and the City if we address this issue right now, by having you follow the direction I have provided above. I suggest that we arrange to have a meeting at your earliest convenience to provide you with any further guidance you may require on this matter. You should also be aware that we are continuing to review our regulations to determine whether there are any other procedures beyond the two discussed in this letter which may apply to your project. Please call me when you are ready to schedule this meeting. Sincerely, Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director AR/ds CC: Robert S. Anderson, City Manager Paul Taddune, City Attorney Jay Hammond, Public Works Director Tim Vanatta, Leisure Services Director Jim Wilson, Building Inspector / Steve Burstein, Planning Office l/ - I .AlÂ©lovE 31 1 JII 7 1987 APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC PRESEINATION COMMITTEE_RELEW .-_...._...~1 A. Name of Applicant: Heidi O'Leary Houston B, Authorization by owner for Representative to Submit Appli- cation: C. Name and Location of Property: Elli's of Aspen 101 South Mill Street D. Description of Proposal: Two story addition to existing one and two story building. E. List elevation plans, site plan, detail drawings, historic photographs, current photographs, etc. which are being submitted with this application: Existing Conditions Plan; Main Level Plan; Illustrative Concept F. Building Materials: Wood siding, wood trim G. Colors: Not determined at this time H. Illumination: Not determined at this time I. Signage: Not determined at this time 3. Effect of the proposal on the original design and architectural elements: See attached drawings K. Identify encroachment licenses or other City approvals needed by applicant: f LAW OFFICES GIDEON I. KAUFMAN A PROFESSIONALCORPORATION BOX 10001 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 3O5 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 GIDEON I. KAUFMAN January 7, 1987 TELEPHONE AREACODE 303 925-8166 Mr. Steve Burstein, Staff Advisor Historic Preservation Committee Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: HPC ReView for Elli's Building Dear Steve: This letter shall serve to supplement the enclosed existing condition, main level plan, and illustrative concept drawings for the expansion to the Elli's building located at 101 South Mill Street. This building has an interesting history that goes back to the mid-1880s. It was first utilized as a boarding house, and by the 1890s it contained offices, as well as lodging. It was converted to retail shops in 1893. In the early 1900s it became a candy store. By the 1930s, it housed an assaying office. Thereafter, it stood vacant until its present tenant, Elli's of Aspen, moved there in the 1950s. Despite this interesting and unique history , the building did not score particularly high in the inventory of historic sites and structures, and therefore, has only been designated as a notable structure. With this low score and notable category, a developer could justify the demolition of this building in order to efficiently develop the site. Our proposed development, however, will retain the building, even though it will create a more difficult building situation for our project. We are doing this in order to preserve a building that we feel is important and historically significant. Because we are retaining the building, we do have a problem with the existing large trees on the property. If we find it is economically feasible to relocate some of the trees to a City location, we will work with the City to accomplish this. However, if this is not possible, the trees will have to be removed. It is easy for us to tell you that we would attempt to save the trees on site, but that is not practical with the open space requirements and the retention of the existing building. Sometimes community goals require compromise. We feel it is more important to preserve the Elli's building, with its 100 year history and secure future, rather than trees whose remaining life span is unknown. h r Mr. Steve Burstein January 7, 1987 Page 2 One of the reasons that we have chosen to retain the existing Elli's building is to maintain an important aspect of Victorian style that is being lost in the downtown area - wood siding. We will not only be maintaining the wood siding on the existing building, but we also intend to use wood siding on the addition. Wood siding was a typical material used in the Victorian era that is no longer used in contemporary buildings in the central core of Aspen. We feel that by retaining the building in wood siding motif, we are preserving a very important Victorian detail in the downtown area that is being lost. By retaining the Elli's building, we also will be able to maintain the corner entrance, a unique element of the Victorian era. Unlike the Chitwood building across the street, where the corner entrance of the old Epicure building was lost, we will maintain this corner entrance. During our analysis of the development site, it became apparent to us that the balance of the existing Elli's building, with its corner location and proximity to other buildings in the area, could be lost if we did not retain the existing building with its wooden materials. We felt if we were to convert the building to a brick or masonry building, the corner would become heavy and out of scale with the setting that exists there today. Some very important architectural decisions molded our plans for the building. The design of the addition to Elli's is intended to fit with and enhance the existing historic Elli's structure. By wrapping the addition around Elli's, the addition is broken into two separate and distinct building fronts. Together with Elli's, they form a family of wooden structures - additions which are not identical or recreations, but buildings which relate to each other through the use of similar features and materials. The key elements which are incorporated into the addition include the use of wood as the major exterior material, a false front above what appears to be a one-story facade, and the incorporation of paned or double-hung windows in the storefront glazing. By sinking the Main Street elevation approximately 21* feet, a small courtyard is formed and the height of the addition is only 2 feet above the Elli's facade along Main Street. We have also sought to vary the setback 10 to 14 feet. This, along with broken massing, further reduces its impact on Main Street, and forms a scale relationship with Elli's and other structures of the era. . Mr. Steve Burstein January 7, 1987 Page 3 We feel that we have responded responsively and creatively to a very important corner in the downtown of Aspen. We feel that our retention of the existing Elli's building, and its incorporation into the expansion, will not only create a good project for us, but will also serve to preserve a very unique and important Victorian era style, scale and motif. We intend to supplement these written materials with a presentation at the HPC meeting. If we can supply any additional information, please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours, LAW OF#IgES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Pro~Ee:*~~~~oration 'Gideon ~906 fman GK/bw LAW OFFICES GIDEON L KAUFMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BOX 10001 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 305 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 GIDEON I. KAUFMAN January 7, 1987 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 925-8166 Mr. Steve Burstein Staff Advisor, Historic Preservation Committee Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Steve: This letter requests individual historic designation of the building located at 101 S. Mill Street as per the provisions of Section 24-9.4 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. We are hopeful that action can be taken by the Historic Preservation Committee at their meeting of January 13, 1987, and the request forwarded to the City Council for final action at a public hearing. The inventory information supplied by your office indicates that the structure was built in the mid-1880s, was orginally a commercial structure, sits on its original site, and is in good, as well as, unaltered condition. Actually, an addition has been added. The architectural style is simple "Western storefront", with the only notable special features being bracketed ornamentation on the soffit. Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Professional Corporation , 1 i Gide04 Kaufman GK/bw F/:64 ALLEY (C .. W.,f'Har'/ I /14#,4,1. WIÂ®* IKE// i#Fl/t-A r~ 1 1 14.-12~~ . :. ./ I . ./ EXISTING TREES W1- 7 * 4 u , ,/ SECOND ADDITION THIRD ADDITION FIRST ADDITION 4 4 . 1 %F. 1./ 2 TWO STORIES - "//,wiâ€ž,-.25// f 4 1,1,1,/,1,/rit . 4 1*1101 9 EXISTING PARKING AREA 22>500*/25Â¥3 g< /,40>5Â«29 e 1 111 - 1- t, / //00 --ZZ.L. ,/ 4 7. I ~ 1// 1 1/li/h 1" . LF N,/fyÂ«. - EXISTING TREES #'g ..'# Â·'~~~''I â€¢1 1 11 11 1 1 !!il! 1- 1. 1 , 4 111 55>/ ~ ONE STORY /////=059 . -- '.. . ... .~. 1 1 , .re 44 , to -1 \ tullillill/Jill/h, -- Â»Nli/Jill"ll' 't,- - EXISTING SIDEWALK - ./ A m (Â© IM O MIR, JAN 7 1987 V : EXISTING GRASS AREA --j MAIN STREET r . EXISTING CONDITIONS ELLI'S OF ASPEN ASPEN, COLORADO L.-/I..7---Irl.-7 1-7-87 O 5 10 18 20 9[> N O-11 'SIOBAIH OpeJO . I MILL STREET 0 0 6 43 (3 - 1 (19494-2 ..... 1 .... lili. '' ............ ....... I I .....0 . . ..... I . ...... ...................t ....... .........-I ...'., V. ..~ ~. ... ........ .... # 4 9 1 NO,>< 3 1 Ill= 1 1 -1.~ :g\VA / ' Z LE> f -1 1 m m 2 O m rn * m J 1 9 .1 J V = U 0 0 1 0 -1 0 Ilfr vitd 0 = 1 10 It I Lk 1 isill: M l<fl- z m 1 0 4 0 11 .,4. h Â» - i j:*t :# r- Â» '2:7 1 VkRYP.. R}J Z X MU Vt-- 4 <5 r m 1 7 r n Â» f' 0 1 U...1. r / .6<X X / X.< i x#pz 1 .0 i - /, j '... v V 9 ./ 4 /0 m 4 1 2e 3ff e'. 1 '. . . . A- I Ht , ..: F. Â¥ .r 1 U . . 4 /- .. -I. I. I . : 6 '''' 133W1S NIVE Illa DN[1SIX3 NEW COMMERCIAL TRASH ALLEY EXISTING 00980-100 'NadSÂ¥ NadSV =IC) S,1-1-13 I . . 1 . - G..hh -- . Â·â€¢0 1.'341%#riz 54% %\ 9 -. A -J t. 4 , 1. .:~ \-4 ~, 111 i â€¢ *-1*. 04 f V.*,PA. I 4, A t- 44 4 4,4 1. ... # 4 -44,74 *.1 *../.... .. \ h \ i.- : I. t>1.4.444.\ . . - /~fl,>R?..I-, 2.bL.- .'A.-~.L.2 -1.. . LF .#r:'44 $ 44 -4214 %6 i. ./:/ - 4 A \:.\4>Â»k<#~,:/'&>~ 4 0.124,3 -1. , :IN,%, : # * . t.. 4 hff_ h.\ \ . tr\ve:Â¢k~ %,3 ,Â»a .r. I. ' j / & 46.4 *Â¥4 %77Â· 7/ - . K. X* ~ ~ '*3 .~ ~ ,.~ ~ .3- A # i . , ..142 <PAL<) % ./ :P .a I 4 - .h / 2-. :% F ..4.- ... . * 4 . ':4 :- 'k, dv I + ' h ' 4 .St.- - I - . 1 ,%.3. I ..6-'i'. I 9, ~kh ~ ' ..- -- *%2 t- 4 I b , :4 . -7 % - . it, â€¢ 4 NgÂ» :- ts ' #, t: -A .4.E V I.kto~Â« : h.-- r 01\ . . r./t .1 #t . #r .4 7 4 - U ~6 rl 41> i, t I - 1.- . - .3 ~\01. :% / .*- - - I 2- 1 41 ..LE=779Â¥-*p-r#23#-------'---'---.----$----- - - / e. A- 1 - \ .44122 .. :11 %.... - -1, . 1- . f--19'.Vitipa398,U -t *IN5 ~---*-' /2~- __--/ 1 , Lrifirmi -+421'~3: EM012'~- *4*lat.I I l<}0> 44- 0./ -A- Vfcm- 0 . ~%**r-Â¥kt:*77-7 1%,Ry,t t=#*l , . ; jir: rtilrE//dtf~El 4 --- ---- 2 49[* ;1-44Â¥ . 4Â£. ~e ,~191 ~'221 9.1 =93â‚¬ la .U *4+ <. N .,--r,-rÂ·-1-Ii.Â·~- ~ 1 k-44 1.- ./- ar I , 1, 1%%% 1- f ..1 /- 1 ' 4,/' .../.- mee: _I-.-/.--- : ./ + 4Â· m_toe- AIÂ·.L 'Â«-= d fi#li~ 0*0*EV Â·--67/-- -10; Li ~1~~ E**466_Â» il 1~i 6 /11 rirt,1 At.Â·t,1 ! 2 ' r./ -:' v: 5 F - .-- ------ --L '14: fiL-I.Ae'- . 1 . . I. f.Â· 'A - -~rfi-11 f ' tw *ic ~>*vDir. F 1 , t -Â»-~~ ---"---". -1,=733-24>Â«Â» 1 ~ i 0 0 jit 1..#Q -1---I-122-0321-2 ------f --EE-4,13- 4;4~41 ilb;; ~q jN f~- ~4~ -~~ ~ *~ ~ ~ . -Â«-7-7 1 4. Uh . 21. 14:.fd [Ull . 1 iii j..~ i.~ Pit f.---2 --1--/f------73 -irn_- eÂ·01' ~2~44$12\ 6.Tj/& 4 Fridit -- - , it,Â£ y i. .1- 1-- -&-2 . 1 At L - 11Â«fol / U<L. 1,4 7 L:40,1 '- \ 9 %-- L_.Ztn.../1 .:1 1 :74-kh-- - -C:>2%1=gl---1 ' L_-L 1-- -4 < ~1 4 -Ill=-ip-*.*-*i--- -====1----- - 4<hs:Â«4, ' 11 I lili - ro *64 4 06*.4. 1 ---v- ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPIL---=37 -- - Elli's of Asl=:en --- 1/7/87 I. - *-+I-#-7 5-2 92_._ --I .--- .&--- b Ii. El j., 1 ~IR{I~ - fULA==4-k -tnga-J.*W Joirt~ mij, ft *Ult.04 tw*Â·4*14 4 t=f -i#UeJ a.\ Al Unlid F Alin 51Â· Aled fAR 'v lb? 01,4 f*&Â· rh fÂ·~44, 11* 44 444 41. drrfou/1 *4'j'*dr~ A+I e'Jl~h,/ A Arb le f 16 rirck,4 6 41~~6* PE'llri. ,#44,41 1 ' 144 19 u Â»u' JU -16 Lo told, 4,4 - *1472,1#C 4;4 'rc)14 vby grd,(9/00 kdr-3 41 4 1'~Â«-9- - MAi# 51 th,*ti417 " - 44,04L â€ž1 fjlti k j Ji ik M ~.0~k - j l'@6'40 AUL Â£ 1{ lill ~t - u,14 141 <U ,) -10, A"11 f 44 13 T /6 61+14 9'4.Â· 06'kÂ£~d ~\, Eptr#f/Ap/%h fo ZON Ki// npYâ€žL-id/4- In&1140 wr"J 1 ADFIJ mdal - Â£ T.14 f livDr -Â¥k-Unjt Le f Â£.1 4 +Mli f ki)â‚¬H RE-3Â£(.T Afl l\.(/13\ B I onj LeÂ·J9 n~ Ift'g 5~3 OPEN SfACE - 6 -P Yck)Â°211Â£13 \ 62,3/GA - 24 - reALâ‚¬4V<bot a '42 4 C D 4 /=pivl 1 1-j F,r - )0@j Ali, \\ J f. 1 l - 41.11 11- - -2 9*72*U'U= Eite- L-~*- or-*424Â¥2 2,#01 LO. 1 L .r . 7,943964 ~ . . S..1 2 -1 I '1 - .1 .. C- 9-1 4 1=le. e 00!-e -19 046105- ACDQ 70 '227992,& 77'44,92. 1 ---- ,-' -- -1-- 1 1 W=:21 $ 1 1 W~ M im e tix~ 1 1~ 5 21 561 &1 6 ;; i; til l i 6 11 ) r-Â« MA56 a: . 1 1. /â€¢a=yp /:2291 00/st,ov,/ r--7, 1/"e- 0/=aV fevi'Scrt/5.. .- 6 -4.- .. 4 f *11 M. - 1- 4(/ - FE> rÂ«-eee. ... 44 1 1 Â»%6 9942' 1 rop. d 984, . 1 1 ,/ 1 4 3 , 1.... \ 1 \ Â¥ AY. - '-TZ -5 pht. i ~ + e/AS-talat GEE-(2 ,&2508' - M+4kj <87- 1~~3$ .lÂ·(*7-19vxâ€ž~M~e~4+- - Â£11,> conceft 1 - 6-9 9 -- &Tl ~Ty- 11 1"682 #/10 " 1 1 ---- 1 1 - -- LT J , 2/ 1 9 -_ 09% BLE OFF'*ZE; 1 1 1 Mloter. -- dr* ra~e e /0920 + 1 Â·.'V O-24Â·. . 1 .. I. i f +4 11 ~- --- ftâ‚¬6(2Â£5 'Dr;24,@s 1 Â· 73> /4Â«V 427- 1 1 - 1Â» - .- OFEN -) 0-7 - b"4/4 el- 2"Â£7 09'ted -7707. -RhetÂ·,02*-93634 Hcaot~ #figir- AÂ« 44_, 4(4 44 A f~CÂ«- - ~~ hekg % A 144-Â¥Â« of- .irÂ«el__ fitÂ«Â« <14 ''066 10_ 2*Xe gcjuik 69.1.â‚¬ /â‚¬242M.. f , - - 7 ... ."-2.il' ..41 - -- 11 4 0 3.- . + I. >42 - -. -- -mIl AL 7 -I ELLI Â· 00 - phoTo 4 Elli,kieff,"h roof ( chivied 814 1 1-Il-17 L 9 Y foll , 4 Ill .4 M . , 4 , 1 ' A 1 -i=' 4 f- ~1-1 .. r -Il. *2 1, 13 4 ..4 L .1 r - L. 4 , + r '0.11 lita .: 1 a.= Ell - 7 a I AY. -- hdi~'i5 11*MIS , 5 49/ - - 19*12 7. p al/Wild&*ft'*OV 4 ta/88/'Milill/"'" *,D: 7 .lapp-* /* _ 4. 14,4 N ..5 - ., 11& .*5~ .1 4 - 4 , ...matk-1 '*% 7/L - r 914 2 ' 114 .aa , 14 / : 9/-44* 1 4*1 4.U... *-1 * LT-1 1 T,4.- --10 Â»4 , N 4 &4. h. r M T'/4./*/11*< Â· 4 - . #Trb . \ . 11/1 ..11 1/1/1 tr Â·4~~~i:-- 5 'f 4% '1:2 4. - V - ' 2 4 r , 4 1 + :2 17 4 -I f Â· .4 1 , 0 4 - I ''i~ ,.111 1 / 9:12Â£;1.<'1*1,17.1 . - ..2 1. i' 9 ; ... , ~$-*-,1-- 7- --~9 . ....../..i 1 - -2= #IN-'Ai In......... . tr- ' ' Â· 1 + I . 4- t.44*mq ~A~~31~t7~ tf~~, ' 4 , -1, . 1.1Â¢, 1' -VBA .61 I... .. .. G~ >* .. .. .. .. . .. al NE ... ..,R ... 24 . >râ€¢'9 4 l.1 6- - 1 Â£ 'B At 1/ r *A , ) ki 4. 1 4 I - 1 1 4 . 4.441 6. ~P r IiI , ./4 1 em<e~im:/62* I It- i 91 . le-,0 kil - Â£* IL- . . r -1 1 . ' 1* Al.\ Lt , 0. =. 10- ,=7 ........ ... .,11 ...1 ...m ... 1.1. Eli -I. -1 - 191 .. 9/// l \ i '' //If J; / 1, . 34 : #itil M 404 J Â£ I ....b,/I- r. g..0 . 91.111~ 44, 2 94- i ~ 1 - t'*- 1- i - 1 , - , 1 111 2=Aâ‚¬42=... P '4!!gulâ€¢,6W-L- __70 12Â£2 -4 pol , fir ~n, I El'16 (to f"t. roof tor .0-*vipnwrd) froth E.Â»145+ At Ced,â€¢1 8,494 flipÂ·e: ir-I+17--- 1/ Â¥Â·4 I. --,-77 2,tur - 1 2 Ptl I p ni 1 6,r . 1 4 28.Ilil fron, 1101<I 34,0*- enty,ha I H44-7 7- - 11 - , 1 - - .~ )2/21-3 0,1.' pet 444|n, ~ 1 E 11 16 frork Â· Â·- 1 ;F:N~;Sip,AR,<- Ca,flinA â‚¬4+,AMvi It-14-11 $ 4..\ . 41? * I. h J. a= ~ '. r< *..plua...P, .; 7 t f.7. Â·Pi;h,1 Â·,*14+4111 S-''I,Â£11 --1----s le-#J.., 14''frA, = -- j 21*.2. A. , ti' 4 4 9 . ' . ' ; * *;tfmt-,~% 1.- ~ Â·: ~, C â‚¬~ ~' ~t' ,~ t . ..n )Â·t>:3 , 5VuerÂ·, 2/. 9 w. .0., ic..Â· Â·51;'rtlve :51Â·<~ 0. ffM__ -... + ..:<~ ; -~-i*~4*tup ft<# * '-ti . -e.'- - .*I. I - '49 ~/ f - ... 1 .. p ca"iffzÂ·:4.7=ijojL, ~ 1' '4,5 r.. i. . 4 .4/ . -n L- /CE:9 - ..39 r .mr'*:/,Â¢Â·Â·i *<ci. 992'Z'/ L. .- 41~.1=.L- E161 PLACE OFASPEN STAMP Across from Hotel Jerome HERE Aspen, Colorado Phone WA 5-3203 -2 J POST CARD i 4 Address 0 : 035 0 Color photograph by Ferenc Berko S-44397 9 f 4 -I .1L , 4 , ,- l 01 5. Nliao / /fill a r 532. ET LAR.VE l ELLI c>4 A*N PROPERTY NAME: LOCATION: 10 1 5. M lu- 6/ BLOCK/LOT: 80 1 #11 PHOTOGRAPHER/DATE:~ '6Â¥A klWOR-I> -7 ~ '8D . ,-4-.un Grot:NinT,ON: .___ Â£161- GAMER.A DIR. 91Â»/ FILM ROLL & FRAME: IDA i 31 2 -t- .. 4... 2 12Â©277 D n LA 4 "n" ~ 411 11 Mi'm st. b, 14 51pwi,j boarij pro #in) uP Dybkil Wâ€¢/| 1|41-77 , + - --1.- - Â£ 01 il 116\\ 4 Â·t d?- (987 03 . mi - Elli's 1987 file #2 4,40 â‚¬ 4\ Fte? t Ph 0% 84Â»2 H 'Al j h f APR 4 r WAYNE STRYKER ARCHITECT BOX 10991 Â· ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 Â· (303) 925-2254 4 ri l 4-, 10/z g. -4 L Af te & 1Â§ u 644 Â»24 AFLM FLAn Mt, 9 PPE 86 911 (9. Zi b ll 1 Ul--21 f)10.9 (94-tvt 466 Oftr 14 to 44 41- fL profohid toot --top AU__06 (Ant tod 1,0~vip Auft 01--- 1 OUÂ°,hi AAC{(51(U QUU~re~,af- u~ rku flL % 4 *. 00((/ ,( 60/1/Opic i to & 82 k.1 9( Ul) p L AAL riquiri/V\V.\26 ?\At,Lct on 00[666 10% ot-- 44+Vi7- 0- A c~ ~Â£ na t-- s (60Â£<-- a. ft '4464 /2 . 4 4/2 44 AL 471 CA 2.9u, 19 4/unt wk U obili~ bi vidi k,> 4-20 (2, ic_ gr~f wgi m/- ,*44 0~ MJ ~/~ d/1 47/7 f~ ~#Ad n / 6-Arl% r loutan city (Aric,1 Mj '1)Â«d-- (cile floof-041 Â· 1 1 ti 4.t. 14 A ll ?0l * o 1 4- fki Â£ ~C u ( (2 Anud- p i lÂ¢ bt- 10 or 1 2% 4 a le ovt MA,_ 4 u r P Ace- 0/ dit C+Li 8*4-6,0kvUA+ 4 A,8.0 1 UN-4 f klial- 444Â·f) 4hlitioi~ , i P (Ul /ll '0v-oj ve-01- l/Tht? - 1 1 A. - < 1 - ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. APRIL 4. 1988 1~- 0 210 S. Galena St. P.O. Box 2506 , 1 . . ./ ...... L.#.... JOB NO 1 3,-Â· Â·Â·1 /-; I --r. I~ Aspen, Colorado 81611 [3031 925-3816 CTil -'Ir Di 'ACTE T F...i L.. .._ v .._ Â£-, t..., 0 Â·, .._; i L. 1 . 4 CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. GALENA ST. ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 REFERENCE: ELLI'S - SUSHI n.u~ t'. L. d 1 11 U, .1 1,Â·, , C. f.-1 i 1 .r p R E S R M P U 1 1 F ? < 2 1 - C T K. 1 . A . 6 ... i â€¢'â€¢ ' â€¢1 .â€ž .-. 1 29â€ž AT THE REQUEST OF HAGMAN-YAW. LTDâ€ž. OR THE rECTÂ« F ELLI'S BUILDING, ASPEN; WE HAVE CALCULATED THE P , I f-11Â£1Â£12,1 gr 1-11=- 1' (21.-11~'Q BETWEEN THE EXISTING ROOF ABOVE THE SUSHI MASA RESTAURANT AND THE MAIN ETREET VIEW PLAIN AS SHOWN ON OUR SuKVLY ur Luth 0.6. a 1 BLOCK 80â€ž CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COLORADO AS FOLLOWS: 1 ) FRESH AIR INTAKE - NORTH FACE LOCATED 4 FEE! L iNCHEo SOUTHERLY OF THE NUMBER "3" COLUMN (PARAPIT WALL) THERE EXISTS 2 FEET 8 INCHES OF CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE ROOF MEMBRANE AND THE VIEW PI a T tÂ·,i .,1. 3 EXHAUST VENTS - NORTH FACE LOCATED 7 FEET 6 INCHES SOUTHERLY OF THE NUMBER "3" COLUMN (PARAPIT WALL) THERE EXISTS 3 FEET 2 INCHES OF CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE ROOF MEMBRANE AND THE VIEW ID 1 8 -1- M WE TRUST THAT THIS WILL MEET WITH YOUR APPROVAL AND 111 6 1 W t MAY BE OF FURTHER SERVICE TO YOU. SINCERELY Â¥OURS; --dig ]19_ -nal j T n 1,1 lv! f- Ht-Â¢ 1 1 1 R RLS 16129 W. 4., ...1>as TE,42.~I'll %* 16129 3 4 3 1h , A . I . 2. ' OF COLU C--/ -lt 1 i Â«20097 , fit l 1 Wok=/ 00 3//1 \ \# 00 0 i - 1 Il Uf -64%13 / I il Â«61 '9 -V# 1 Il ----t lupppg-7----trT/2-*-----L-il f, / 4-423-1 4 -. -- it /4--1-1 iii Al :2 - - ) , t * 4,/Ir-Â·c=Â»-1 i i --- 4 9 1 Wi '1 // r Â»Â°43Â«--- . 01 1 94*409 '1 4/ t i p 41 k 1 ,-' ' 1 ,; 1 1 94 41 A 1 RA - 4% 0r j/l --*"'f.17- /8 r -- 1,--f / i /4>-\ \ 1.U - f f \34-4 1 ->4'12),3-fA it 1 L,#im/,7 -*---- lib lA, 11 ,#Ripy ,34 fliÂ©542/it 1 Liujcnt'jj~ ~21,9-11 09 - 1%29 1-4 N-- - / 0 1 - 1 ZE}jnx?ts -7,///7?i**i3 1/ i //4 \ *1 U - fe ...Â· f y MÂ« t.Â»2/.67 Â«IL-b-2.- /14 it" 4 L/' 1 1 PN , / 1 . -7 , 4 1 ff d - -1 /h ' i . Â·O" 1 1 --r . I -- I l.3.-i , Â«=dzle 0 1 %41/46<~/1 /1 ) 272 ' f-,OPA 4/ i / . COFFSE ~- -Â«I I L 1 -2-rol 2- E-Fzf+-ri,9-ki 3/1 1 -ny .Â· ' /3:pult/1 W. f a 4-,-- - - 0 EL 15115 DUCT I p 36 1 1 e ..1 /1 LU DJSCAAEM.9 VERI-ja,o,U* Â£29463 '1&1 40*x 8 9, 4 74 DAYTOR 7(1287 4,0 E.*1AU ST . .1 .tfoop. -7 R . d ' - _ 41 41-1-- E le . 11- ' P . \ KltHEN tj)- DAP,TON '2(â‚¬99 . 0 ..1 \ ?AW rf. ' 0 11(44u,r ' I Â· Â· , upi 140Â£,bouTâ€¢wr~ 4.. \ ..'Ce. 4 . 1----9 , 12/ , ~\ j 1 tyuor.... . 2. ~ Flop - , 1 ..SIN K..â€ž- r J 0 Â·31 ' 4Â·â€¢ 1 8 7 F...... 0 .4 IN F . W /-- 1.UU'.F [1-.B . -,~*, L.- L. V L. C - 5,2:-'p.:it,(9Â· ..1'.,F'~ rk.?83),4.639Â·495*319.E,~Ti#,r,11'.11:4@14 1 -1-~#1Â£~4~2~1PFT,45141595 ' 'irbi*kki.:Me<Â£;6731<~ig'ph:9"i'.11&2363695~.i'.3~ * h 1 1 j..1.3*~fHrilfiA<~Zoakit; P GHJRRE~SURE. r 14 HIGH-VOLUME,AND RADIAL BLADE J +1â€¢11.t,Ul . i, ~ ~ a.:r :/*b,425&4*5:36-),Â·, -i jl - BLOWERS i I. 6 â€¢ cl>4 *4,141 t.-4- 9 ' HIGH-VOLUME DIRECT-DRIVE BLOWERS ~ Â· t' ./4 : i. i . ,â€¢,inim WEki41p' 1,~1 1,11" 11 . 1.1, ~ 1 01.4-:~i;ty"NMA>Â·rÂ·'â€¢ 1 e ..tdÂ·- 'â€¢ Â· ..r.'.Â· 4.' 'â€¢ Â· ,:m. Direct:drive,4,Iigle=fillot,0,1112]1-volume blowers w washers and on blasters< forced air furnaces, . ~' 224,3 â€¢44471,Â¥,9.1 ~,.,;~ 5 Unletunobstructed,forgeneral 7 'used extensively'for general ventilation when drycis, and gas ovens. Â£,fliclent performance , 2. Â· . f,flf, *lijp':40: k. ning/proceshing and industrtal > duet'systems aretrequnÂ·cd, such as exhausting StinÂ·dy welded steel construction, dynamically rge which canbe altered onthe .41 foul'air, blowing'coollair, forcing air through balanced wheels May be assembled to dis- e Â·~ ' 1'1/142 0** r in; ' drilling new holes and rotatingÂ·,cill , chare at anyone ofS equally spaced positions ),;, .13- *Ift'.90,1'91~4',1'r.,6 Pos1tion. 'AdjustableÂ·top â€¢motort/~1 Bit 04*yao-,4 mounting. Rugged construction ,lit: *Dfl~Pir,' >~, ''0â€¢''fi''X" , 7cook<NE*~) 1!10~1.Kejuhasobloot~rs~'a,i~c~aurddst~Ii~i~70~ ., 'Â·1, GR 0*~:o#ic, i'j 1,. 1 N.R.fa ey>#97.,1,0 2 faci?2'8222mci2i}}:1!, il 'p~,I:.\NSÂ·%(f2*Sâ‚¬Â§74 339Â«--K, Cij~nav~~l~Cit,traver~ LEMEG7~237Wn litera- 1, ' '&1 ~~ *&444,1.'t'.2 ast codes of AAICA. Maximumâ€¢Jk .tfut R=..111'â€¢1~,NV'P. , i *.,8 444*>'f*4. %: G, BLOWE-1 DIMENSIONS 9.,1 U en*24â‚¬.3.1.,1 11&-92:it,YZJise, continuous-,92 '54!( Â£29~ U'.2260"JEÂ¢12'Â·A , 1,, ally protectedd' ,1! 'm>!A, 150441,9,11~,B~.7~,~4~~ ,~r,j} - Stock Who 81 outict Overa!~ /'El ft,;:4Â·fijiLA tely when blower is ordere Â·41 1,4' B 1,-U" I No DIa W. Bore Inlot HWHWD n these blowers, ask for BulleÂ· ' 9 1 &Â·i '*2, cy , i, 22 'Â· ' '- - 41 , 1 C'791 ~ -fi ki;439*.~Ji,-1, '~;~~RFF1 - .i Â· - 1C792 ~~/4 ~~/0 ~ 8 81,4 5% 16 15 14 , , e.:,~ 5kt,Â£,!4'~>, ~ G" 74" 41&" 15" 14" 11" LA: F t. SIONS Â·Â·Â· ' 1 9 x 41/4 16 9 10 2/4 6 1,9 18.10 9 X 4 E- 8/8 10% 649 18' 10 15 â€¢ d Overall .: Shp, , . . 1.,~,4.'-I,~I:i i,G-, 4Â· h 1$.4 â€¢â‚¬lbl KN+11 UEfffEEL*~ ga ~a lia J ~ ~ :pr fle*k,0. 1 - . , 9 1 R zuy.30 1 -350. 4 ' r WITII'17~5 JPM MOTOR &,DRIVE'Â¢F ";,~ Freo '118â€¢ r 1/27 3/4~-1'/4" .Stock,vi, 14â€ž'9(f'. .~Â·),9 Shpu. Volts Â·Â· MU. 'S{ock 37, 414,7 -â€¢ ,/ U . ata 2 &,9 -',Â· ./ '..:,. p *?: With Automatic *01. 41:Air"'SP' ,SP ' SP, SP' SP' ' 'No."â€¢''LIst,~I;â€¢411 ':'Wt. â€¢' 11P RPM 60 Hz Typo Mto Brus f No. "' list &_Eakh IN <,1 1,3% .4 r.(r'. I . 't q . i,â€ž. 1,;92*Tlisimal Protactio,DU '-4.:505'i 500 515"420 '300 'L '1[791 .;80 654Â·&11)12,1264: 1/4 1725 115 5,,lit Rbr Stv. i7C037 $167.30 I,&~41 Type J:Stock No.'~List.,>1 Eâ€¢0111",i#,â€¢985'â€¢ 920 '870'1705 '655 '360 91(,79' i'**99, JJ-FACIP4 '180 1/3 1725 115 iplit libr, Slv 70038' 199 75*Ff ..,N; 1 :'4' 658%41 L: '~pP~iitt ~~i~WgÂ·NE.E:'gg '~'4''a '1Â®3 968 930 850 7132'480 =C802232435 4%14/~(2100 1/3 1725 115__Split Rbr Slv '7 C 039 0225 83 ./101'01 '' ; â€¢102.91.4 ft.irr'. i --335-=--2CDSâ€¢:IN'15--pitj:'4225.0 1/3-1-DIEfiD/2.10 Car-IÂ·ms--mv--mcay-Â·;350~b5Â·~43,14 I Â· Ef/'4~'<'45' &94440 Y Split |*,70653,9 572.00'1'34213 Â·-aÂ· 6 ~WY., Â· 42Â£ ' - Â·, .' ,Â·,Â·S !510.1450 1400 1290 1200 1000 â€¢2(890 U4170 'k*.4 1 310 '' 3/4 1725 115/230 Cap ; Rbr. Slv 7(453â‚¬321 20,Whw i ~,~ 0 2 Y'I';. abvÂ·i ,â€¢ <A. 1510 1450-1400 1290 1200 1000 2CSB0-14270-139.91'320- 3/4 1725 230/460 3-1113 Rtg. Ball OC454'734345'*4:1 0 LJ.,g ,2060'1970 1870 1710 i500 1020 '2C939~-'151852&;U*!3606 3/4 1140 115/230 Cap Rig Ball 77(648'Pr368512 ; râ€¢, , C. i '' '7, - ~ -L '-: 3".,7 2060 1970 1870 1710 1500 1020 25939."151,85 11;u'4 30,0,- 3/4 1140 220/440 3-Ph Rig Ball '7C649'240360'~ Â·c Â·" (') Blowers No 2C.)38 and 2C939 supplied with No 1X494, rubber motor mount for eitra quiet.pperation IRE.- BLOWERS_ 4.2.3 t. 0'r f*Â¢*'1~,f.~ ' n :e ,;2, ,St,, 1,Â·,0 1 0.'p'IN ,... E~ RADIAL BLADE 764 to 131h" WHEEL BLOWERS , $ e,;3...i .... i i J rve' blowers provide a hip- 4; EFS-0-IfÂ·Cleaning'AIUmii<uni'r.1'2%~ Widely used in exhaugl systeins wliere air conlaiiis dirt, lint, dust 'Â· If -0 "L i . i pressures by combining Lh~.'.'Â·e Â· ,, ; ..Â·_ ,* ''w and other foreign material-because wheel is self-cleaning type. , 1 , ';~, , '~3128$j.~41 rzrmt' W:}:22~2;tif1t22"'-j~ t;:~"Â·Â·Â·Â·,lid".91'9:Typ,â‚¬[b~Ns.3,1.-0 -j' Also recommended for conveying stringy or straw-like material 'r I Ill , 1, ' ,# 1 7. 6.5,11 V ice s are cast alummul dynanically balanced and are self- ..'116 ' 11, . systems nousingmade orbo'Â· 1Â· .,. /-'7'g"T~'03?â€¢ ,4 1.1'inp.1 c Aa ng to climinate z ]14Â·-ceot reduced alr flow. Alr deliver- . . .''â€¢ 1 111 1 'Â·1 - r - ' 1 Â· ''6 1'.'. 11 Â·4 +E' ' â€¢ NWAti?AN[littal'IllyfASi' 4. 1,04 --179491,14);Â·'1 1 4-;11 3 les are based on slanda,-dlestcodesof AMCA Standard unitsare ~*3:0.-Â©;.b;(.~ - 8 pressure 'work where highâ€¢/,4.44 ;~,5054~'1'--*;Â·t,'\-,4~,8 ,..1 built for CW rotation and bottom horizontal diccharge Ilousllig b ", and babe made of 16 ga steel with continuous arc-welded Joints. c Air,deliveries are based <te , 2.: P/f A,A \ . . A IN 19'71 Ilouiing and wheel can be changed al time of installation to any , 7. ip: 'rt,14'.'f'- ' ' Gray finish Motors pack,4Â·, 0.1 6,4, L._ f 'â€ž. " -_4, , ., rotation 01 any one of eight discharge directions Gray flizls h. 5 21 /*ELAL e:~2 =ftliEr =*34 4 1 EFn 101'Bli~HA~'F 2,2 4 Motors packed separately when blowers are ordered complete , ..5.17 the~e blowers, ask for Bulieâ€¢ 2;,i Â·11 ~ ~411,12" liFZ~'!~fiftf~ BLOWER DJMENSIONS t .k ENSIONS Stock Whool Inlot outlet - OIl ' 011 sh,g ;,~ ~ : &Â¢Â·:%9'.44"It: Dia W Boro Dia H W HWD 1 -41 , ':. 'A. fz A,1.-'~6~ 'tl-15'0,4.1~'~tri,4 I NO. , .L 9 1,â€¢& . 140' 8" 894" 5%" 15 15- 14" 66 0 , , , /1.2,4. At ;,f.3 outtoLY i K H own'tof. 1 .w?: 44,I~ft)~ftl&.,7-' ''Â·Â·' 3.21,i Â·:1 te:;:h &1 1 4 ,iSBRN ZIA- A Â¥4 1,~ 9 10% 6% 16 16 16 66 0 . 4, al/9 ~~| 1 - . .4 '19 +4.4%,V. 1 : .'e 'LAIk.1~.r '"}--, _tâ€¢Â· 2Â¢864 11 2 5% % 10 11:/4 8Â· ' 19 18 17 GO 0 , :b..1~1 : Ulâ€¢ 0 Â·Â· W 6 W 18" 16" 15- 1 , (: 1 010# Wk?N/+1"I: I 3/4 -571, 211.16. 17 -~~t~ ~1~~ 1-SYAY *Re ~ ZU St t22 12Â¥Z 18~ 27 22 22 66 0 C ~ U.9.4 /7.Lu., < 28 23 23 660 J~ â€¢~ Aliff ' A..1. ETE.WITH 1725 APM MOTORIa 15/230V |,With'3'phos, 11$48~: ,'*,61'a CFM Air Do!,very 01 1725 RPM 7 BLOWER Less Mptorr. ea;BLOWER COMPLETE WITH 1725 RPM MOTOR 1 , ~' ~,~"ficij~.,~r~'.f~~'',~ or'râ€ž 4, ','Ball BoarJng M,j*~t,4'.>t'R-26â€¢â€¢ 1/4' 1/2", 3/4'; 1" 1 16" + 2" I.Stock :r';' 0~'9? .4,-'' 60 liz c :... '-Stoclf_:u:Â·Ue'.;33~t -;:41-Al,--SP' SP ' SP SP- "SP SP â€¢'No.'i':' list *~fâ‚¬?i HP Volts Typo Brgs ..m~~T? 9-12Â£~ ~m;il Afâ‚¬('Â·'Â·7 E.ch,Â·' Â· No.Â·Mlist-*60*,,-VfÂ·,4,4~,'il~ 4'70 465 ' 150 -2 - ,- '2CB62;$147.75 82Â®441 1/6 115 Split Sh. 7 C552 ,$230.40 1UBh j rt:' *4, 1-4*- Â· ./ I .I#19 'U'â€¢ Itt -2 .2 765 635 1 480 .200 '-- - '2C863,1'15885 'Â£4*11111 1/4 115 Split Slv. '7(553- 244.00,~MA~~ ~~~ 7C567 $345.15.â€¢SW#/0; ;.Â·45~"too -1335 1225 1100 945 430 - 2c864 --> 203.45 08901 1/2 115 Split S]v, 7C554 Â· 321.25 -mi#qll .1 ~,~~~2~~'~ , 7C568'#383.03Â·t'~0Â¤IJ c.;pi' jÂ°Â° '1335 1225 1100 , 945,430 - 2CB64 11203.45 ~10Â§ 1/2 230/460 3.Ph Ball 70720' 38550,0*~1 ~' ' .~cuÂ· â€¢. 4~1 1973,2220 2050 1890 1700 1185 ,350 , 4C21711,315 10. ~0~ .1 11.10 Cap Slv. OC555 , 554 00;U@391' AR Ak#/ 4.1:/ Â· : 7 -Â·Â·,4,Â¥'7.':'Â·'r!, *15 2220 2060 1890 1700 1185 350 Â· 4C217 â€¢ 315 10. IRD;G# 1 230/460 3-I'h Bail 570556 .52545 '.Ridall /4 .M ,: "T 14:Â·'Lr . k, at '' 2~900; 4112.i'goo 2840 2660 2480 -2280 Â·1820 1020 14C121Â·Â·Â·41225' ~ 2 230/460 3-Ph Ball 7C639 676 2,5 0*~ il, 4 ~ 11~411.ND}7~61.41 ibove have _ i. . ,1,:,I.try,r. lie<t- Â· '' . *flf ./ 1 ). 4C950 or /./9, 0' D'Mir, -- i,.- ES...- : '0'0 â€¢'' -1,yar NOS 2Ct]62 thru 2C8G4 have 4 mounting points, and we recommend 4 No 4C950 or 4C954 floor :-1 ju .. 4.,00.-L. 3..c mounted vibrationisolators Nos 4C217 and 4C121 have G mounling points, and we recommend 1Â©81;1'~ i.=1, 2 9.' 0 1 1.1 , , o I '.2'.' .162 6 isolators, Nos 4C950 or 4C954. ; . /5 4 1Â¥11 11 11L ' 3 'C~'Â·' ' 1 40.1 11, )KI , INC. X 12. SEE WARRANTY INFORMATION ON INSIDE BACK COVER 1525 rt ' " i /5 3 U f'I, Al'NU , . 1-,10.''t':Mlf;iM.- ~"61-0.a:Â«e~-'t-â€¢~X . 1 . 1 ..Jr . 1...... ....2.:?171.A L i' ZAr 4 ,3Â·49,~Â·.:.9,591,51Â·~f403**:~itÂ»~ffÂ¢.,6~%Â§,?C.,4>'r:fli ,.'1.,~;-,1,1.2.â‚¬2?7.,[~'.,~, 1 -:b,.f*.t. 4~,Â· .,,*>Â·50 . *mfab#iwwpm v ,..,Â·â€ž bmÂ·,0 -4.fk, b. 4: 61:?,-4., :31:;,99:yÂ·266'~~~343>D./..1:2.4'1~ ',~:A.f .14:~,,~,~LETott,:.##4.~,r..,<g:i?,ao>:4{A ;SP>~?2~11,4 4 14 + , â€¢'Ir ;Zr%'1:42-~~Â¥h ,(:..lf<f,('fl':)?151,4.,CY.14,11..: -''' ~ taÂ»429:2381,44%2#t 1,44:â€žÂ·y, 4, f,r#.,93 1,51 T 5~~*.fir,:klt:'.,>3.d? t.ly,1,2 :9.Li:.-â‚¬:,tf '. ~ .. 1.. 1,1 . i.<~ -. 6-'. ~,-:2 -;Firl ZE't,Â¥.12-<Â·433 i~ ~fi'p: .;,4-.-~fiD.-1:Â·11 1-1,l,~fe ..,,...frÂ·,M'ti?44~~i(t~tÂ¢492;i; .' . ".0,",:~,442;~fv*flk~tt;jf,jtt#stÂ¥,1 ~tÂ·,Â·t.4 , Al. 1 1,41.1. I .1 . 4. ..1 9.1 1 1 ' 1 ''r ge k.(*~*w â€ž* i>53~ Â·U/1 t'X Â£'~9'*r'r'~;4~.% 4'u'. ' '4 k'â€¢ txre tf.: 'X. . ,.",':*~ .1, ..U.,-V",-- . 1 . J "W , .t a .f~~~:~3~~~141~~~-,~~4 &~ ~ <~2~~~~ ~~ 1 I -1 .. 1 -: ' I I -2,1/t rf~ructr?Fy'l,~,f~*Â£*,H 'I I . i, . 'irl- 1 1 . ''It't-' " i' lili ' 1 11 1- .1 .,::,1'L.'i, ' ,-,1'12.11 #1 11,1!'~~-f3-*-5 ,&'~' 2,~: ,:_.; YLE ,:.,~': ~L, :,~ *~.'*,'M<J~~.A~~~.6<,632:,4 -- lilli 1 1=11 -4 1 - P.lic' 111 1 ill Â£ 1 . 111 -11 11 21 1 f'i'1':~1~'3~'.A -* ,1 ~# w-H#*:ili'#11 4%71*148* !' I - i . /1 TI, / 11' I - 114 1 L 1, 1 1 lilit lilli' 1 1 "~A r"Ig'' 4411 1 1 11 lili!!1 1 1 lili 1 11 lili 1 1,1 1 11 111 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1-1.1 11 5/ 1-111 1 1 1 ," _t, _40 Â·:-i~tÂ¥'-~i**0%4[-e' 111' 1 1 ..,~_, /1, f, , 1, 1+ ;f ' i /11 | ' 5# i,i ~~4 11-111-l'111111-1 1:11 1114, 2,Â·~ ~ ~~~,~.~~i~i~~t jill . 1 1 1 2 - 11 il-:1 111111[ 111 'te,J#f,~.miz-.1 1 lili 4 1 11 'ilid 1 1 14 1 11 11 1 - , lilli- 4 1 1. 111111 ~4 11 -11 1 1 i 1 + 111 111.8 5 21'*2,1,9*ixl,>,4, ~ 41111 11 1.1 11-lili lili 1 1-1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1-11 1 1 q It 41 1 1.- 1,/1 '1/*. I, 1 ~ '11 11 1.,lil i 1411 ill 1 - - 1 1 147 T'ZE& ,/ll. -'14Â£it:1 r.iU,31*Â·tjb:r,< BACKWARD- INCLINE. BLOWERS)Â¢9~4~ U.BACKWARD 114 ti.*1' KY ~ F '" i f.~ 2-,-. â€žW~~313 4 and cooling systems. Motor can not be overload 04 4 Â· 4 :44#46*...,-1.7.3. .. kitchen. restaurant. store, schoo< hospital, factowl, 44 a %44-:-- kli4% Mkt-'.Lf 9, 'i,~in J piti i .,.~ .. .~Sv.0-,*2&'tr. aE r.,1: 1 rr.eÂ·.,Â·,f MT~lnecri.c~irv't~t:;Rl>1~ACSiti=;:Â· 32â‚¬3(52 ::1{12:~h .YA ,;i.Y :44Â¤-,0; -4941': ~' ~EÂ©Â©;91'1' 149tti~: *~11 .~&~.1,Â£,9.~Â·~ 0 Y%~i~oni~l~1'iji~~~1~fS flima~!tecR~?Af~UEÂ·1?18=*,11 . 1*, A :42 ~16 14 6,0 ,..Vt;14*R.%,+'JIFip*,9 . ':Â·~ Â·J'JAI.Â·rn. criertistedln lable below are based on standard testâ‚¬~* I u Â· ' -. . 211' 4|, |~ 1-111-lili lilli 1- i v.~S#SW/~.. GM?~ i Â·Â·' -2 '5'#u,3:, of AMCA Slurdy arc welded housing and + F 90 lili 11 1 1- 1 11 AIr Detiveries Bascd on Standard Test Code of'AMCAL ~ 7 '' 44 1 11 I ..i:' SLOWER DIMENSIONS L III'L 1 1 11 - 1 Wheal Shaft Inlul â€¢ 0/lili Are~ 0Â¥/fal( Oporating *: 'iYLESS MOTOR & DRIMO'PÂ· -' "~'*21â‚¬>UA:Â· 11., . ..,t.: t.li, .iÂ· BLOWER , 4 Dia. Dia. Dia. H W Sqi. Ft. H W D Temperâ€¢turâ€¢ /Stock No.NK,LI:t-fA~'I~>4-~.- 4~'.fQ*:00!i i,Shaft..r '~~~et,ir , Outlt 12' ~ ~ i 1 121/4. .1' 1 1394. 1, lili 11 *,4-IT-121'1; 1~ 1' , I ' 1~74_ 1 , 013.*':1?L.Y.Z_ .27 30- 22' 180~12,222'C Â· :,Â¤40332)* *538 80~,~%t~i ~P~0Â·1~*a.''AÂ·-'Dia.., 20 21'hi.-151,4 -2.320 0.40.42 315', 180Â°F/822'C l/< 143(018,00(K56.20;11-J'-1~1â€¢Ii.' ':'a4?rmÂ»'An 11 ,",11Â¥16 Â·Â·Â· 39'6' Â· 24,6 1'/i. 2Gh 264 19 4 3.4160 48 46 43 250Â°F/121. lt ,Â·-4.-3 C019 ..... 1 IL.vl.Lm.,i:,-r d; 4'â€¢ita'Â·34.#R?Ch -Â·JAI*Â·Â·,)Â·14 39 46 ; - 111&111. V.111 1 111 111 1 . --Â·---nÂ·.ir v. BACKWARD, INCLINE BLOWERS :WI+H.'-Mdi;CREAND Â· DRIVK.,turrÂ·4.17,609*Â·'73Â·tl'24,1~1,5*,4,Â¤.BAÂ¢'KyÂ¢*pt:~ b CFM AIA DELIVERY AT RPM SHOWN Â· Â·Â·. 4 BLOWER WITH 1725 f PM MOTOR & DRIVE.'112 2~'147 3, Â·Â·Â·Â£ 4,2,, g: pitÂ·.Â·.Â·t,} i....fiÂ·:Â·â€¢Â·,,Â· CFM AIR DEL ~|'t'll|~' 1~1"'1'1~1 li :.'t' 1 : Trith Capmettor Motok Â·9"'71- 8.Ii Bearl:Iquieti~k Â· -2.,U,1/ 1,1.(11 ,,Â·PUB,v. a) 441 With 3-Phaso Mo#*W, 18..1,1 t,loi i, iw.,..4. lif , 2 .ff V' , 2' 4 01 r,IL 1 11 1 Wheal 1/4- 1/2- 3/4- 1- Â· 1 14- 1 14- r ' CLOWER 0 ;' I "-" 115/230V; 60 liz "Â·2.4,' t!:91230/460Â¥,60,Itti.,fti>,AW 6950 6720 " 6180 5975 53 Dia. SP SP SP SP SP SP SP APM HP Stock No.,' Llit:g"E~nA siock NoÂ·:'A:Mat:'*Â·Â·*~*;t, 1 , 0950 0720 6480 5975 53 -lurin ', i , '-I I -r'l it-:11 WA- 1405 1310 1145 - - - - 1430 1/4 17(63091*730.60 0,!Â·22,81- 1,Â·'7C031 11:010.00 **~ *,~l': ,â€¢7900 . 7700 7470 7030 .' 69 1630 1495 1345 1180. 900 - - 1545 .1/3 1 7(632'Â·S.744.45Â· it ,#lf:~-7 C633 4.jigt,10:~,~)6k.d; :7900 7700 7470 + 7030. Â·65 11 1 lilli - 1 1900 1780 1655 1523' 1385 1240 -- 1790 1/2 ;7C634'..r, 703.00Â·lf,it!Â£ 1.,7CS35..?;*7.25' ...... ~ i.~}{1 Â·*:183- ~%}8 ?%% ?it 149(91111:1 ~1 4 lili 1 11 1 2205 2105 2000 1890 1775 1660 1395 2{)50 3,4 â€žac5401 1 835.25Â· 11% t 'Â·37C64174;IU)7,50'1~4AA 2435 2345 2250 2155 2050 1915 1725 2245. 1 .Â·7(844Â·--2Â·915.53,M't-YÂ·- :Â·47C645*-*.8283.8(Y,mlld@U 3Â®.,k'710230, 10080 0900 9570 92 I ~,rt,Ik~Ii, Wi~Â·~'T " ' i F 'li 1~ ------ 2895 277,5 2700 2025 2535 2450 2275 2010 14 -70$40Â·'4 973.23 ~'14,1* Â·3â€¢ 7C671 2.*7,25 â€¢1)~@M *Â·7' r T 12300 12160 12000.11750 111 '; 229'0 . 2130 .1070 750 - - 1 105 1/3 Â·" 7C283 ./ r: 775.65'-h-,4, 6. .,:7(28;E:m33-m,0 %â€¢h ,10300 10100. 9800 9250. 87 %'ll'Â£-IC-1-~ 1~l,1-11,i-,I~ ~,~~,~~ j . ,21~Â·RN'2370 '2000. 1~10 '- - 1275 1/2 '7 CZO5't',1 798,7()'.:5141'1.~;~i::*:'+.862.90Â·1~** ,~~<; ;~~~~ Â·1%{}8 1~288 1~2E~-itif ~, '&12 %13 iE' 2%13 m 'EO - E. ir -~1;mi#HN#Â·41%6;!i#Â¥7(190~#ll#?3Â·ill' 49*' 1 :Â·14160- 13970 13800 Â· 13410 130 'Al''pi.Misi I ' IL 1 0,1 1 k,N 4 1 ; 4400 4310 j 4270 4180 -4080 <3980 3700 I 2030. :2' 'Â· 77(291;Â·111130.50Â·,Â·hal.h~Cri~7 Czg4*~0(M.90. Â·. . pt&10. 4Â·Â· 1.16930 16790 10640 16280 lOg 0 3550 3400 2900 Â·27CZ91311078.50; 74','6 7 f 7CZ92'*.981,30'. ' Â· 4~194:15950 ']5780 15610 15280 149 0%1741 lili 7.! -910-12-mETIBE*;4 47cz95-'-'1114.9* ' ' 1894 3 190 2850 2400 - - Â·. - 2 /"ZE15ic0TiEGO 15000 14290Â· 135 ~ B.1,. j,IL f LI' lili ~~, '' 3980Â· 3680 3380Â·:.308,0 2550 Â·- 3/4 9.7C29Â£311110.45'1- ~ -_;tiii~i~}}f94*4~:***ic: 7 23400 :23150 22900 22110.. 22 2,1,9.C '18700 :18400 18080 Â· 17490 168 pr-f*/'li~!LI| L -KiJ. 42403940 3640 3300.3000Â· 2030 2 Â·1~Â· 1 1.' t,~7(299t.41175.20Â· fil' il ; 21080 .20850 20000 20000 Â· 1!45 4910 4650.4420 4310 3860 Â·3530 2300 1310 '137(301;1Â·7135201-~ I-" 6 1 17(30ZN1259.054 =1, ~180 5210 4990 4730 4500 4230 3000 1442 ~ 17C3036Â·*1412.r- 1.!411-.1~lit,17(3014-li-1~23'~ ~1 ~-6tivi15/2:]OV 001!z rigid molihted, ca h41411-111: %1111 L 11 -7 20. ,,.i 4090Â·,3665 3100 2260 - - - 860 3/4 107(137..(Rkl_-1.- .1 1-4-)I rbC13841405.7& 1 'F,iph..230/4609.60 z. rigid mounted 2 ,. 4780 4410 4030 3560. 2845 wHI'4' 41 1 '*Ii:11111 114 982 .1 97(139Â£,01407.45;0 -- 11~fi?2:::*ff}t~:Â·i:Â·~~~~~-~, T.212~' 1'~'~ '- 0 'Â·' - ; Â· iNg.Â·&* 16% 2 2773 8.13 270 10 P 977751~1?3-8693.13~1~~4-i-i:,17ci472%144.74:~~~i~~'WkATHEI~~PROO~E~ D 1- 11,111111 1:11 " 7085 0824 6570 0310 6055 5780 5125 1400 3' kE}Â·'ALÂ·,fiIÂ·Â·*1478.75(Arr 47,Â·ti7(148,93~1491.55 1. 'i, i','i~ip LE lili - 1 312 .. 241/1 6430 5780 5060 4220 -1 - - 29 1 .2 70149<74205275 LIT 'L-til'-,7ClnoÂ·3--2021.00.~~~,*333642-9 f-::Â·~ i'.1 : ..0'clu 7120 6740 6170 5380 4120 -- , ~ l'h .'Â·7 C151 8440 7960 7410 6930 6270 5680 - 925 2 ''01(153â‚¬.'2212.63 14 i 9730 9300 8990 8520 7970 7450 6370 1015. .3 M.,4-4,10â€¢4Â·'2087.05.*-r-t '1 7Ct515'22060.30.B:Â£7#31Â·.Â·011*AilÂ£1'.4/.1 + ' 'ma :,; gu, 4'k,i'Li, f'i, I,1+It 1 4:j Â·,|' '44 I 1810 11450 11050 10300 10300 10100 9000 Â· 1250 :5,0 ,;g-47Â£VOGO,307 1-k'.1 '.,1(1.-0.7420,78*q,~#~~~~*~~~,v~*i~~~ â€¢, 1,-r t, ~ _11 ~PrI A' 1 1 .-1 1,1, 11,16 11,1 : 1 lili r.1111 11 1 0.9 ,!. hic , W~~ii 4.479,:rutgrl,qi,14#+t~64 ~ R Car V.iqÂ¥g 11 - r) 1151/1 60 Hz, split phase :notor. Â·â€¢; 4 1"2 / . 1 0'712 A-: '-4-1- c( ~,~' '~ ~' ~ ~, ~o.~rdAi~F~E~*EPEÂ· (n~~o~Y~if ''~~~~~,(~aTI~~~~5~t~~~~rEIi~~~-f?~ -~Â·~t:~}iÂ«Â»4~#J ~ ~~4~ -~''~'~~ / Â·LYÂ· -1 2 111 1 '12 : Weather Covers. -2 1 - 22 The centrifugal blowers listed above have 6*mountihg'points, ahll v>e reconirn411,!iF~f~'441 ivzk)%4 :ut - Â·c ' 4'Â·t tj h J "24 A'' Ek " ~ 4 -- ~I ~~111 hill k It 111 'F.'sp 6 floor mourtted.isolators to reduce vibration. Blowers No. 4C333 and 3.C0732<1 1 217 $-i,i rl,VMI,--1_ I I.-7 ' ?Â·A' require Â· No. 4C950; or; 4C954' isolatdrs, blower'Nci. 3C074 ;belovv' 11451 111,4 , I ~a#:~FA,b';th.66,The centrifugal blov 1 4- 1 71 44,7. 411- 4:N:G , i *71.0- recommend 6 floor requires No. 4C951 or 4C875 isolators. Blower No. 3C074 above 1145 RPM'brid , r ,13' 2â€¢~,woj,1 No:-:3C109 blower No. 3C048 require,4C952 or 4C955 isolators. Blower 3C049'requires'No.i4Â§9531,Â»ji{~!1,&.9,'3CI 1 0 requires No. P~ 1 611' Ill 1 - or 4C876 isolators. 1 . . ,:, ...Â·~i.,Â·i;,i:.i'.3 .,-~Â·ir,v,Li. i Jâ€ž,0Â·I,Jl'W,*ttfÂ¥~, ~ ~ No. 4C958 or 4C87 1- 11 1 11 ; 1534 . Â·Â·Â· NET. WHOLESALE PRICES-W.W.GRAINGER, INC.3.0.':. SEE:VVARRAN; 111: 2 1 , A Â· FEB 9 9 February 1988 , HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Mr. Steve Burstein 303/925-2867 Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Rooftop Mechanical Layout/Elli's Dear Steve: Please find enclosed the final layout drawing for the rooftop mechanical equipment. My delay in getting these drawings to you revolved around getting final details resolved and the Owner's partnership approval. Construction has started this week and with good weather, the reloca- tion should be finished by early next week. If you have any questions with this layout, please don't hesitate to ca I I me. Very truly yours, 4Â»' Heidi H. Hoffmann AIA Project Architect HHH:sv enclosure CC: Can-Am Partnership .Ii'111111111111111111111111 J>. I -1 1 - :38 I-Â·1 ON :11 rÂ·1 1-:C 1-< -ENGINEER F.01 ~al X '5{ T'?P R--7 1 1 .1 +1 --I , - 11%23 -~ !& 1% '\. 30/ 2 1 Â£ 30134 --4 4/2 Z EzE C-Ror. 1 AT 13 LL) A,/1 N (2) L.w,0 -6./ , Â£36 k)04-0 N r 4=40 167*-firy 8< '<45: 4 7--1i 7- I 41114 4 ..' 0 1 62-f - 21 2 1 SE-ATION' A-7- J,-au/91. >.4 :~ LOOK.i 01 2 A â‚¬7 tidA,--2- 934 f (LO.' ADDrrib N -1-6--eLLiS jill le /73 * 1 -- 1 1 1 J .- f=,1 yo Re AtiZAS" 1 2 .- MNLE -ur Airl oniT f I , 4.- -4-Â» -1 - - -- AG:-OLATE: SAC 11 Ourr i To E-X!9'nk}<. c.02.84 1 / COMAOS'~ , f AIr. au':44. ; NO (44%*7 1 - EViT; 8 3. C 94 R Ell/%1 2 -~ To Piew Aip uk}945-0 p Â· .00?S, 64)4 7- S j 1,51-(014 1.0 n.-* 1 / 51 iIi 1 42'*~,~.~ 1 ~ ./ :-/Â·1 '(F CS Loge E)(167. "1 I f==1 1- - c 11-Â· 36'34 -ritÂ·.19 00603:Lu. 45>001* $,1 11 1 '' Â¥25:f>eNT 9.f : 1/9 e)(142 -- â€¢.k 2 Â£ 2 Ful 1 1,1 4 - 1/' 1 .30/22 Fr--X \- 29 1 1<:911 1 HELD d kE ro Â¢49 LO CO Ra .A â€ž 1 \% :1 Wit- EXtÂ°in W G 10~12 1 C>M . : > 1 M Ew opâ‚¬>.1 19 4 --~ Ill 1._1 -- -- 1 11 i ., i 01 -Flk 9 11 Â¢ 119/30 se-1-7 4 r~ -%/ p:EvtÂ» 20(17710,1!4 4-ler Ali 01 0 11 fboF-ToF MECH AN)LCAL Aic.)9 CL<n 63) Fi-108 To-3121__ '11' laa ASI *6 JAN 1 5 15 January 1988 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Mr. Steve Burstein 303/925-2867 Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Addition to Elli's Dear Steve: Please find enclosed a print of the Mill Street elevation marked up indicating the location and division of the awnings. I under- stand this was requested at the December 22 HPC meeting. Also, I have enclosed the design for the fence at the alley. The fence will be installed this spring when the soil is more workable Holes will be provided to enable the meter reader to read the gas meters. As far as the roof top mechanical equipment is concerned, I will alert you with a copy of the design per the HPC consensus before we begin work. Very truly yours, 44011 Heidi Hoffmann AIA Project Architect HH:sv enclosure cc: Can-Am Partnership - <144 NW*09 Â¥'m'ti~4 0,;~iMJ j n, ji14,\41 'nfi.4,*fec,fi.ji., - 119 4â€¢,-â€¢ ,ll*r '*"~*V 1 I /6 10:7 A 1r Â·Â·Â·~Â· i i \ ~ 7 4 1 I Â·Â· , i /11 1 \\ / 1 e .9 / 1 - CLEC.Ti O 6 1 PLAN.i 1 2,K'19 .2.1 9322 01 c-, 0 7. 21,6 15.:.,-:U Tbc , EL/M. /909 804 C.42. C,Er ED ~'41 j el -* 1(/ 02 â‚¬30 492, j~ b x 1 C)44:2 CA~0~~ 7 * :--4, +E,sr -,L--- --- w f { g 1 d I A 2 v- \ , ...J It 11 11 1 ~~_CLHM// EG BUS?70. 00/hjct, 1 ~ 1 1-4 0 0 -VE- - 11 22\ -.... ....n -.4-'...... .... .. 4-1 11 11 1 .- It 61 11 1 1 . l,\EFAIFY (,07<Tic):,) OF a/ L~ L. Teâ‚¬AT FeCT *0-T-TOMS wl 0.10. N'\6120Â· paâ‚¬yuour 86: 6,46 1 Â»â‚¬2.1Â»VATIVE COT'rl,133 % *rÂ«MIN G MS 6 - 5â‚¬C.71 rof-3 <6564, 4-0 47, 09 ,â‚¬Â»725 0 15,vas, 9.\JEf-'Fy COLÂ·ne- 96~ MKC-14 13.Â¥9.-1* ALI Afj FOCT e Al.UGe 01: CAL)â‚¬Â¥JA.,M-, 9 '61 3, (oug pt,crL (D emx-- 6-# k.> / 91 /. 4- y G =b'- 1 ! 4 6 9, M , , 1 0 2 \ r MEMORANDUM TO: Elli's File FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Roof-top Swamp Coolers on Elli's Building DATE: December 22, 1987 PRIOR ACTIONS: On November 19, 1987 the HPC tabled action on the proposed screening of roof-top mechanical equipment until the applicant would come back with further study of different location, height and screening of equipment. At the November 19 meeting HPC approved a number of other changes to the restoration plan for Elli' s including patching of the external walls where length and height of the under-structure was too big. APPLICANT' S REQUEST : The applicant presented a number o f alterna- tives to screening and moving the evaporative coolers, including: 1.a. Screen fence around the coolers in present location 1.b. Build new parapet to height of high roof along Mill Street at first step-up. 2. Relocate the farthest east cooler to a location west, connecting with 32"X32" duct. 2.a. Relocate the farthest east cooler on top of the high roof, connecting with duet. 3. Relocate two coolers farther west and farther apart and one cooler on the high roof, with ducts connecting. PLANNING OFFICE COMMENTS: HPC's concerns expressed on November 19 were to remove the big coolers from ground level views as they are obtrusive and call attention to the new construction that seems to encroach onto the "old" portion of the building. None of the alternatives fully meet those concerns. The screening (Alternative 1) seems least appropriate because they add a further architectural element on top the building. This would be even more obtrusive, in our opinion. Alternatives 2 and 2.a. relocates the cooler most visually obvious from Mill Street (on sidewalk outside the Cantina), but requires extensive duct work that, while lower, may have some further visual impact. The Option "a" alternative places a cooler on top where it can probably be seen from around in front of Carl's or the Aspen Times; however, being on the new portion of the building, its effect is less significant. Alternative C puts the coolers in the least visible location, with minimal duet work showing. It really removes the coolers from the portion of the building associated with the old Elli' s Store, and for this reason is most appropri- ate in our opinion. The applicant has not reported in this application on the possibilities of placing the coolers in the basement or insetting into the high roo f. Verbally Heidi Ho f fmann stated the internal duet work from the basement is very impractical, taking up significant space; and ventilation for the system would be a technical problem. Heidi said insetting into the high roof would require a structural support system not now in place, because of the weight of the units. That too would require displacing space that the applicant feels compromises the internal design severe- ly. If you accept this study, including the verbal reportage, we conclude that Alternative 3 is the most appropriate alternative. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to approve the Alternative 3 roof plan for relocation of three evaporative coolers on the Elli's Building at 101 S. Mill Street." SB.E.SWAMP - I. MEMORANDUM TO: Elli's File FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Roof-top Swamp Coolers on Elli's Building DATE: December 22, 1987 PRIOR ACTIONS: On November 19, 1987 the HPC tabled action on the proposed screening of roof-top mechanical equipment until the applicant would come back with further study of different location, height and screening of equipment. At the November 19 meeting HPC approved a number of other changes to the restoration plan for Elli' s including patching of the external walls where length and height of the under-structure was too big. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant presented a number of alterna- tives to screening and moving the evaporative coolers, including: 1.a. Screen fence around the coolers in present location 1.b. Build new parapet to height of high roof along Mill Street at first step-up. 2. Relocate the farthest east cooler to a location west, connecting with 32"X32" duet. 2.a. Relocate the farthest east cooler on top of the high roof, connecting with duct. 3. Relocate two coolers farther west and farther apart and one cooler on the high roof, with ducts connecting. PLANNING OFFICE COMMENTS: HPC's concerns expressed on November 19 were to remove the big coolers from ground level views as they are obtrusive and call attention to the new construction that seems to encroach onto the "old" portion of the building. None of the alternatives fully meet those concerns. The screening (Alternative 1) seems least appropriate because they add a further architectural element on top the building. This would be even more obtrusive, in our opinion. Alternatives 2 and 2.a. relocates the cooler most visually obvious from Mill Street (on sidewalk outside the Cantina) , but requires extensive duet work that, while lower, may have some further visual impact. The Option "a" alternative places a cooler on top where it can probably be seen from around in front of Carli s or the Aspen Times; however, being on the new portion of the building, its effect is less significant. Alternative C puts the coolers in the least visible location, with minimal duet work showing. It really removes the coolers from the portion of the building associated with the old Elli's Store, and for this reason is most appropri- ate in our opinion. The applicant has not reported in this application on the possibilities of placing the coolers in the basement or insetting into the high roof. Verbally Heidi Hoffmann stated the internal duct work from the basement is very impractical, taking up significant space; and ventilation for the system would be a technical problem. Heidi said insetting into the high roof would require a structural support system not now in place, because of the weight of the units. That too would require displacing space that the applicant feels compromises the internal design severe- ly. If you accept this study, including the verbal reportage, we conclude that Alternative 3 is the most appropriate alternative. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to approve the Alternative 3 roof plan for relocation of three evaporative coolers on the Elli's Building at 101 S. Mill Street." SB.E.SWAMP t: 44. 9.-9.4 . .... I - 99 i i --.Pol'ofleÂ· 41%,Aeâ€¢ , / MAKE -0 r Airk ourÂ¢ | +-*Â·----1-- RGLOZATE: 1743,1 00rr - 1 1 --6- - TO fE><tert U, CU,â‚¬.64 1\ . \ -4<" 1 COMP)JM. ---133 Aâ€¢CL .07.42 Af J NO C*Vi - 3(1570.14 6948 6 3</ef. 07-4- L i . .r ~161 . To 86*:Atw Uk}USGO - . - 31 b . cors, j ~1218 -- ~ 9-looA F â€¢ 1 'dr- UNg. 1 1 44Â¢11 - - Â· li - - Â·Â·Â·- 44 1Â·0/3'9 K.---L' 1 t==1 2 4 LO66 Exter. - , Of>Ed\U t. 4%- e"trm& 0911*Ub ''Der<te,1. Â¥2Et-68~* rO 14043 c..0 Mt'~ 4i: 116.V.7-- ' . U 7 1 30/22 1 r\\ 25-\ 1 14 1 -77"-A--7/T---712 3 a Nx /1-107 - EXP,Inw L. 130/ze on, , i NEW OF>60 I,U. 916 4 0 1 < L_-~I 1/"9 4541 1'Â¢90 59,1 4 8 ...# FiEVISEÂ· DOCTWORâ‚¬ 460)* cldÂ». HODATE)/0 MEOHAA) ld,AL ti)DIfl ON --Ft>_ff-%6- '711 /88 PEI 08 5 1,7 f,%,4 It 1 OFFSET 5,L, 46, Or-#01*,MT (TYF) 6.L.1 n 8 10# 14- g,AR 4 605)40Â£.2- 0#- -VIÂ¥391!-'64,* 1 -1 pearAVANT (EQUIP 1~ (- 1.-4'<~'1~noN o= _5'TVME I 1 OM~- 9 le#,fLANe ~83,U'; Aj,L iti#,8~ - BEd.Â·r>04,U~W,A#7* EGN//9 4. 6, /0,-re''oute 7 1, --' . ~ 1* - 3 E.- 1 v EVAPOBAT /ve ~\ 47 - /,7/5573 ) </ C 1.-0/1 1 1 402:009,2 9 Â¤E -1 L _ d h - -l 1 ~ 44â‚¬-VATDK ~ 0~--71 ' ---- ..- 7. 1 12 ..*- --- -r, 5,L. O# / J ~CtiC;QÂ·/7,i'/1/7~(-9: VaÂ«77<AL-, C/-1Â«Se ABG,4 3 + 1 1/i. i 3/.4 .-10 A A f,Yow j ili,KA+I# 1,3 i Â£-%-* 1 , 3* i . h 4 1,4 I Il ~~ Y Of /h, 33/"#f j/V L./Alt; 4 4- 1 w' f A HI AhÂ· f'.441 h Â£/A"B'*/ J 5 A, 4 1 %-7 r (JUI It &40 4 14 1 0 ' 't <4 4 j tri,At).1 3 Ne:<71~~ ATE EN A-tE * 3 tÂ«)OF PLAN - i f Afts 1 3 )4 1'/ $ A 2 0 J.1 1 0 , 1 A(32/7-ION TO Ed-0/'O â‚¬ 1/all *7 -' ft ' Ithp ;'' i 1 MP,1 A T,w,ilt Â¥01 bilit! 17 \ 1 4% Wkit 1 Â«Â»37 5, 0, 4,6-, 6*fulafir (rff) 1 1 <' 6,L. ~ . r-1 115, A Ur 8440 nOO \ \ L--1 12.*16197 J<LAAG ~31, Â· 1~ 2126,/iRD'**o 1.4:4.4 *.411 1 ~ ~11//,7/06; nt:..2vruwa I ...:.r'.1 2.0 Â¢ 1 U ,RecTAU (*Abl 840/F, \ 1 l h a 10\ 1 /-*#Vi 70\U i h.lb A it.1-rt,FE~----*adl. 7,~40~ e Oi )119 | 4.6, 31 1\.4 Reloal \11'\ h --1 1- \> 62.,?F /'712'73 1 14\~ *.4,0'El 2 \ ~96 ~-Â·1' . CaDUE M./1 '' I. 111 - . CA) Ie))4 -11 110 432' 2 1 ~ ~ C OpfloÂ·v, 1,0/, j _*** -/-.-- -*-* i 1 \\ Â«ave K 1 0 S,L. \ ____1 0.--- --*. --I.-- -..Ill- I.-1.--- 9 14Â«iÂ«, t,cy 1, 7./. 9> u/ean:=Au cpÂ·056 AFGA 3 ffÂ» ~C OK -Viwplant AMEF-NATE 41: 2- --------1-KIN-/--- OF'tion D Alterait,4 Diuffi,vid . lÂ«>Ot= PLAN Opt*n "A" ABC>11-ION TO ELLJ'O 4121 793" 9, 4 111(/4 11 6 11 i iâ€¢tÂ· 1-/. ... .A 2 219,2.2 , m BLOWERS BACKWARD INCLINE BLOWERS# u BACKWARD I B These heavy-duty blowers feature flat blade ' ba Â·Â·-' * '1'4*3~31#417052 ~ incline steel blowerwheelthatoperateswithdeep 4 cone which matches inlet contour. Non-overloadinl , .'... p pU//NT*Diu 'ltit)- emi and cooling systems. Motor can not be overload 91Â·Â«Â© 7. >Â· 1 , *:-ul'~.0 built for emcient continuous-duty operation on , ..'St-â€¢0â‚¬- Â· . r 1. hOP m -4-1-4 - 17':,Â·Â·Â·Â· m' Â» 0 ,+Indi . given RPM and horsepower, regardless of the a ..... 9 1 tt'*fll#.~*1*~1 : 4,1: i. static pressure applied to the system. Widely u ; Ar ~~~ XL~ ~;47 U'VA- 4 1., woR ' kitchen, restaurant, store, school hospital, fact IMU-%]~ 11 -st,i'4. similar air supply applications. Wheels are dyn Â£ -~ .- - _ . :211 r. 1.ima'O./42/Elelid 1~ ep,71,3 .balanced. V-belt drive blowers run CW rotation, -- 1 2 ~ 11 01,; Am. horizontal discharge. Discharge can be changed in R . 1 & ~4 ~ 1 Â·f es, . any one of 7 other standard discharge positions, Air 4 .-E-;1#lt ilili43. 1 .tlri 49.- eries listed in table below are based on standardtest . . F~ 11 ~ +de.,11: of AMCA. Sturdy arc welded housing and framd . Â·, 1~44 ~ 09:os. enamel Bnish. Motor and variable-pitchdrive packed - ... i. ..2. '~ . Â·.At . 4 Â¥#01 rately when blower is ordered complete. Dayton lit Â·,11 :y-~~ ..:f.-54#91 9, is available onthese blowers, ask for Bulletin 703+ f '199.Hz.24& -Â·1~29.31:.1-tflb -' Air Diliveries Based on Standard Test Code of'AMCA BLOWER DIMENSIONS i Â£16.5.6..SLOWER ONLY 464...4.Â·~~'*IAdi t , Wheel Shatt 1~let 00'lot Area 0.-alf ~ ~~; 19Â¥iESS MOTOR & D HW i .1 1 . SLOWER Sq. FL H W D Temperature ') Stock No.*Ultz(24 lilf 0 , Shaft Inlet-- Outli 1. 134. 134- 94' 0 858 27 30' 27 180'F/827C *14033 2 Emm .â€¢~ 6.. 9 Dia..: Dia.' ' H 164 11% 1.280 30 35 77 180'F922*C en(0734, 655,80' i i j..1 41 1 l'h. 29 29 : 194 1444 1900 37 40 32 180Â· F 82.2*C 9-3(0741*â€¢776,50 . -~ I 1144. 324 324 i 214 151â€¢ 2320 40 42 35 180Â°F/82.2Â°C 11*0484056.9%1 T ~ .#r. p., 11Â¥16 391,6 3954 B 24'h 1,41. 264 261,4 19 4 3 460 48 46 43 250Â°F/12L1Â°C --3C049 -4 1518.9Â© --Â·--mit:, ~Â· BACKWARD INCUNE BLOWERS WITH MOTOIEAND DRIVE ?Ub jÂ· v - ' 2.4 â€¢tÂ· =" '~'12& :43618ACKWARD. lb CFM AIR DELIVERY AT RPM SHOWN BLOWER WITH 1725 RPM MOTOR & DRIVE 'h, i li'~.t':dÂ· '' 4 CFM AIR DEL -.' 4"*4* i,MU â€¢,P"AL..O , IL'With 3-Phase . Â·. IM Â· W 1,7 3/4' 1' - With Capieltor Motor= :23*~1â€¢11 Bearl * SP SP SP SP , SI Wheel 1/4- 1/2- 3/4- 1 1 9.- 19,00 r BLOWER Dia. S P SP SP SP SP RPM HP Stock No., 1.1# p Eac ' Stock No. jit k 6950 6720 6480 5975 53 115/230Â¥. 60 He .4 .. . 0/460V, 60 SP SP 6950 6720 6480 5975 53 12'/â€¢" 1465 1310 1145 - -- - -- 1~ 1/4 7CS30'..v36.60 . 'cd,Â£.b.00 ,Â·Â· .7900 7700 7470 7030 65 1630 1495 1345 1180 , 900 - - 1/3 4.70632.3 744.43 7C633 2-1.10 , Â·Â· 7900 7700 7470 7030 Â·65 4#1 1900 1780 1655 1525 1385 1240 - 1790 1/2 7C6344 763.00 . 7(83Â£017.25 . 1 - 8590 8400 8200 7800 73 ~4 2435 2345 2250 2155 2050 1945 1725 2245 1 7C644 t-913.53 2 7 (645%5~0.80. .ud 10230 10080 9900 9570 92 2205 2105 2000 1890 1775 1660 1395 2050 34 Â·. 70640 '. I 835.23 ,. 7C641~~117.50 < 1 85Â» 8400 8200 7800 73 2895 8115 2700 2625 2535 2450 2275 2610 14 -7(640 1 973,23 7C671 %*7.25 'iÂ· F 12300 12160 12000. 11750 114 15 2290 2130 1670 750 - - - 1105 1/3 7 C283' r 775.65 7C284Â·9 842.30 r.: 10300 10100 9800 9250 87 2690 2560 *2370 2000 1260 - - 1775 1/2 70285â€¢ 1 798.70 >~ 7C280 ff:862.90 *.2 ..10300 10100 9800 9250 87 3070 2960 2840 2670 2340 2000 - 1445 34 *287,1 MI.35 027C288 2,883,55 Â· !.12030 11800 11590 11120 106 3420 3350 3260 3150 2950 2610 1150 1590 1 ;7c289 -1 923.05 Â¥- 7CZ90 1071 891.35 -14160 - 13970 13800 13410 130 9 4, 3930 3850 3780 3670 3550 MOO 2900 1850 14 -7C291-11076.30, UC292'8<981.30 1, Â·15950 15780 15610 15280 149 - 4400 4310 4270 4180 4080 2980 3700 2030 2 7C291( 21136,30- .7C294;*1004. ,- f : 16930 16790 16640 16280 160 EÂ· 1.14 3190 2850 2400 - - - - 910 1/2 7 C295' 21050.75 267(2981&1114. - 15700 15360 15000 14290 135 3980 3680 3380 3080 2550 - - 1080 + 3/4 t'.,c29*Mlll&43. , 7 (29 *&Wl 138.65 8, 18700 -18400 18080 17490 168 1 4240 3940 3640 3300 3000 2030 - 1145 1 4 7Cm t. : 1175.20 17003#1143. e , 21080 20850 20560 20000 195 r, 4910 4650 4420 4310 3860 3530 2300 1310 14 1-*301; , 1352.65 Â·?OC302*21259. t! 5 3 23400 23150 22900 22440 219 5480 5210 4990 4730 4500 4230 3600 1442 2 - 7(303-t1412.95 1 7 C304~128 1. ' CÂ®1115/230V 60 Hz rigid mouhted, ca 20 Â·. 4090 3665 3160 2260 - - - 860 3/4 tti7C131L[â€¢ :1383.556 7C138 4 1405. iph.: 2301460*, 60 Wz, rigid mounted : 4780 44 10 4030 3561 2845 - - 982 1 .9 7Â£139: 445745 :7Â£140â‚¬1425. 5440 5110 4790 4430 3995 3410 - 1100 144 :77C1411+1557.75 F7C14521464.1 M Â· 5985 5685 5385 5080 4740 4330 2720 1200 2 f ~(145Â¥(1610.406 U 7C147.2.1478.7 7085 6824 6570 6310 6055 5780 5125 1400 3 4;0 Â·L-,$. r1478.736 57Â£~48,21491. WEATHERPROOF I 24# 6430 5780 5060 4220 2 - - 740 1 7C149i-- 2052.75 p 7C150Â«2021.04 61.> ..4 " Fc 7120 6740 6170 5380 4120 - - ~ 114 * 7C151. 12143.15 217(152*2047.95 ; Fj~ 2 du 8440 7960 7410 6930 6270 5680 - 2 '21C1530 '221265 â‚¬7{,5442087.05 -144-/-9.I'~9 ne .4 9730 9300 8990 8520 7970 7450 6370 1045 3 'CDYÂ·~,&5,1087.0* Â· 7C155 ~2060.30. gu 11810 1145011050108001030010100 9000 1250 b51.'.0 4-r:-,-74~62060,?0 Â·JC158- , ./WEMB.'*4: - i.Â·. - t. (') 1157, 60 Hz, split phase motor. . 2 :,Â·Â·,2 .1. I.....r.Â·Â·Â·.Â·-2-Â·.,i~",/ Ll( 1 40Â» . -r. ....,443 MATCHINGWEATHERPROOF DhiVE COVERS.Â· q 'OUTLET VELOe frY . " '*Â¥f ' 3'â‚¬j?r ' ~ '11 12 For weatherproof drive covers for non-over- for any given static pres- -1 0 â‚¬ 2 Â·Â·Â· sq M loading blowers, see Index under Blowers, sure can be determined-1 L : .,doutlei â€¢~5.2~ Ali â€¢ Weather Covers. , by: 6 floor mounted isolators to reduce vibration, Blowers No. 4C333 and 3C073 01:5161., The centrifugal bio, The centrifugal blowers listed above have 6 mounting Points, ankl we recommendi . 3203>'7-1'frroir.ACY,14,6, - ii require No. 4C950 or 4C954 isolators, blower No. 3t074 below 1145 RPM i *ic:. Â» recommend 6 floor requires No. 4C951 or 4C875 isolators. Blower No. 3C074 above 1145 RPM arid .Roid No. 3C109 blower No. 3C048 require 4C952 or 4C955 isolators. Blower 3C049 requires No. 4C95 , 3'4&*3cl 10 requires No. or 4C876 isolators. Â« 0 0.4 4 No. 4C958 or 4C87 1534 - NET WHOLESALE PRICES-W.W.GRAINGER, INC. - SEE WARRAN '1' UGH,PRESSURE HIGH-VOLUME AND RADIAL BLADE tk;::fl- 4(**j*jjJU, . BLOWERS BLOWERS C . r .7 11. , ijÂ· . AfERS*tâ‚¬ 444'.-f35-46 i- 'te~?W o~*ja 'HIGH-VOLUME DIRECT-DRIVE BLOWERS 1- MAÂ·unÂ·'41*:2 '44 0... Â· - . ItÂ»Ut Direct:drive>ingle-inlet, high-volume blowers washers and on blasters forced air furnaces, Â£6 A th inlet tinobstructed, forgeneral used extensively for general ventilation when im:w wet'Jiftd:into382Mn, d*~mmianaib; 1:N:. loning, processing and industrial duet' systems are required, such as exhausting large which can be altered on the foul air, blowing cool air, forcing air through balanced wheels. May be assembled to dis- ~ 732#af.=%=1=,f=::1 r'~2*-94*~14~*~g~~f~~~ , char e at any one of 8 equally spaced positions. Air Aliveries are based on standard test codes '~6 - tÂ·~2222%%~*WfUR ~0~22Â«**79Â¢--1.e** AMCA. Gray finish. Motor packed separately when blowers ordered complete. Dayton litera- l 31ocity. Over-sized ball bearings. ture available, request Bulletin 706. test codes of AMCA. Maximum, 1 //,2:Es â€¢ArÂ·.V.'~\Â¥*1~~ . 1 1" ' G. BLOWER DIMENSIONS Gray finish. 40Â°C rise, continuous- 1 19,1 :22- I \ _-e.L- 0214~~ iatic-reset thermally protected, 1 lia'I Or .1 '-- I Stock Wheel Outlet Overall rately when blower is ordered iKÂ»#4|011~. Dia. W. Bore Inlet H W HWD 3 on thes~b~wers, ask for BulleÂ· - 1C791 6" x 3" 1/6" 6" 7%" 41/4 15" 14" 11" ~' 7% x 336 46 8 84 5% 16 15 14 ~, ' i - .- 1~.4.AAdj?011 6?*41 Â· ~ - ig&& 8 :12 2 9 103/4 64 H U M at Overall . Sh,4 9 103/4 61/, 15 7 38~09 18% : 82 U , 18 HZ 88 21 19 1& 6E'. 17' 11" 15'. 21 19 8 19 -12 - 18 - - 35.0 ' 9% 27 15 22 ~ 60.0 , Cal Air Deliver, at RPM Shown Â· *14;BLOWER Lesâ€¢'Motorf.. 942 BLOWER COMPLETE WITH PROPER MOTOR f .i. ER WITH 1725 RPM MOTOR & DRIVE3 %:ju y W W la. Ata,440~ Hp RPM RM Type m. eras.:*2.k 'ti:p*Â£:~ lh; ' F Data 6 EN,2 : With Autbmatic ~ . â€ž17 W#Thermal Plotactiogil !&95 i'560 513 420 300 ' 1- t1 C791 .;80.65'~ 1/4 1725 115 Split Rbr. Slv. 7C037 $167.30 ~ 10 , ~ 1'!rpe ~â‚¬ Stock No. list,94 19â€¢1~ 983" 920 870 763 655 360 â€¢lc792 :7 99.059~ 1&0 ' 1/3 1725 115 Split Rbr. Slv. 7C038 199.75.I 5 Split |*57{:6510â‚¬ $283 054$18- 4 1005 968 930 850 773 480 2C089 52435 ~ 1/3 1725 115 Split Rbr. Slv. Â·7C039 9225.85 .~ ,1. f . 5 Split 13%7(652 + 382.25 4,228* 1180-1160 1125 1035 855 - 2(938'; 134.15~ 23.0 1/3 1140 115/230 Cap. Rig. + Slv. *647-356.95Â·.~ 111 5 Split PFC653 -34- 57100*341,~ 1510-1450 1400 1290 1200 1000 '2CB90 44170 I 3202 3/4 1725 115/230 Cap. Rbr. Slv. 7(4534321.20 ~ R . t,t... 16 1 4 1510,1450 1400 1290 1200 1000 2C890 3142,70:I 320 - 3/4 1725 230/460 3-Ph. Rig. Ball 1C454 143.45 Â·I ... 2060 1970 1870 1710 1500 1020 *939'Â·4151.85Â·ti 36.0, 3/4 1140 115/230 Cap. Rig. Ball la648;':536.85 'll ~Â· Â· 2060 1970 1870 1710 1500 1020 50939.'.151.85.JI~ 364. 3/4 1140 220/440 3-Ph. Rig. Ball 7C649 -403.60Â·ji. 2 f) Blowers No. 2C938 and 2C939 supplied with No. 1X494, rubber motor mount for extra quiet/peration. t ;URE BLOWERS - 2 Â·. Â· 2-: + .301Â·: 0Â£'2.1} F (02#~ RADIAL BLADE 73/4 to 13'h" WHEEL BLOWERS 1 1,0 7, I I 44/ curve blowers' provide a h~ ~lfÂ·Cleaning AIUminulâ‚¬gM Widely used in exhaust systems where air contains dirt, lint, dust 1 .k igh pressures by combining the L , Â·Â·-1 and other foreign material-because wheel is self-cleaning type. olume and high-pressure 1,00 ~ Â·. Paddle.TyptÂ·Wh.,Ji.UNEB Also recommended for conveying stringy or straw-like material. p . *. Iffs;:t=. 1=MT:=t:mq, .~~1*1645 =:l::Câ‚¬Mfi:i?M~~'~:t:;20;:29:il?:~2?1:WEUMÂ·WiAS -'t ~ t joints. Housing may be turnee p ~~ ies are based on standard test codes of AMCA. Standard units are . A ki e se'barge directions. Heavy m{*4 k iNA.,-â€ž.~.JUV%1:*AtPA p 4: 134Ef built for CW rotation and bottom horizontal discharge. Housing :9-0 h pressure work where high- ,/.la,aa 4, Â·-re'-4 I81jV and base made of 16 ga. steel with continuous are-welded joints. Â¥Â·h .42. ble. Air deliveries are based 0 j i/ /1, U :.- 1'Â· I -Â· Â¥2Â¢# Housing and wheel can be changed at time of installation to any Â·~~ ~ A. Gray finish. Motors pach,11.* ... Il...1 mt---i....5/I ht rotation or any one of eight discharge directions. Gray finish. . â€¢ >f .. rdered complete. For appro,16 - 1.n..B. 9 Motors packed separately when blowers are ordered complete. At r. 01, see Index under Contrif' *. on these blowers, ask for Bul- SLOWER DIMENSIONS 'AM . Stock Wheel Inlet outlet . Overall Shpg. IMENSIONS No. Dia. W Bore Dia. H W HWD Wt. ' Â¥3 4. .Â·1. :*P k . 4 2. 6 2C862 7%4" x 4" 16" 8" 81/4" 53/8" 15" 15" 14" 66.0 Â· , Outlet Overall 3 1 *.: :Â·9 Â· -Â· t.'Â·; Â·Â¢â€¢*SM,7 â€¢ ./ . Â·Â·t H W HWD~~4 2C863 9 x 43/4 4 9 10% 61* 16 16 16 66.0 - . ' 2C864 11 x 54/0 % 10 11% 8 19 18 17 66.0 103/4" 614" 18" 16" 15' | 1~ -Â·-4 '***~. :~;r, 43 ,C217 1 13/4 57/6 21' 16 17 ~ Ul . 1244 x 744 96 IPLETE WITH 1,25 RPM MOY~E~ 1 *.6-u Â· . ..Al .2 :, 122 Â£=C121 131& x 81/8 7,6 EN NO 18~ E #& M 66.0 1/3 , 66.0 'N i rt 115/230V Wit&3 phall|J~ f~* CFM Air Detiverv at 1725 RPM b.BLOWER Less MotorÂ« Â«: SLOWER COMPLETE WITH 1725 RPM MOTOR :. Motork f Ball Bearing ~ 4 D- 1/41 1/2" 3/47 1' 114' 2"Stock,j + - 60 Hz Stocke.1-3 ..2,; Stock-1-16~ 1 1.- SP SP SP SP SP SP : No.Al_List ~ HP Volts Type Brgs. No. ~L List ~ - .Each Not *' Listâ€¢â€¢71~14~ ~ 470 465 150 -ty - - '*C8624$147.75 ~ 1/6 115 Split Slv. 7C552 $230.40 0 $236.11 7C567 r $345.15199* ~ 765 635 480 200 -- - '2C8632.158.85 I 14 115 Split Slv. ;C553: 244.00 i 1335 1225 1100 945 430 - 2 C864 4203.45 I 1/2 115 Split Slv. 7C554 321.25 5 287.099' .7C568'93,15... v,{ ~ 1335 1225 1100 945 430 - 2C864 ?Â·:203.45 ~ 1./2 230/460 3-Ph. Ball 7C720 385.50 -7- i ~ 2220 2060 1890 1700 1185 350 4(21714315.10- ~ 1 115/230 Cap. Slv. gC555 554.00 - 94 I!5 2220 2060 1890 1700 1185 350 4CZ174 315.10 I 1 230/460 3-Ph. Ball /C556 525.45 d above have , ~*1~ BO 2840 2660 2480 2280 1820 1020 '4C121 , 412.25 ~ 2 230/460 3-Ph. Ball 1Â£839 676.25 No. 4C950 orÂ·T A. A ..10 Nos. 2C862 thru 2C864 have 4 mounting points and we recommend 4 No. 4C950 or 4C954 floor mounted vibration isolators. Nos. 4C217 and 4d121 have 6 mounting points, and we recommend , 6 isolators, Nos. 4C950 or 4C954. 1 ER, INC. 1 & Â¢ SEE WARRANTY INFORMATION ON INSIDE BACK COVER 1525 1 1.,4. 1 -:, ABC HEATING & SHEET METAL, INC. 0195 VENTNOR AVE. - ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 - (303) 925-7944 k *0493 ~ F~ - 4 .2% --- -- 691 .blbi~ 9%0 .Â£=61=- 0 4 6 /12â‚¬00 _1 Lf# 19 / N:>204Â«:t -- .$i nlT77'.7 U 1 11 1 11 Ri t w' 21%>-- 'Pon\Al J 4 9 t # c A Â©0~3:fl j f; aL* i 1 ( 1 N<=- * * - Ill : -4*5- 2/// 9\ ajouccolzzle./ / , ' 1 , 1 \ 1 I , / i J Plj-*9 0 Z I r a,w 1 1 N li '1 14 7-1 / /hals/:l & \.26 1 4 l- -- - A lit Â« 1 41 84 0.-- Â£0 UN tf â‚¬ 1! I // i 11 1 1 11 !; 1 \<49/ 1 1 '11/ : 4*ZI~ fl ----- - ------- ~~ k 1 1 4% i C -- -! ----41-609 Rbs Avt LPIN (-1 6 4 .. Aspen/PitkinÂ°Planning Office 2.1 -9.0. 99. 1. I 130 soditjalenarstreet aspetâ‚¬#Edl*~f?*11(W 81611 December 10, 1987 Mr. Gideon Kaufman 315 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Gideon, Please be informed that at this time the Planning Office is not witholding the issuance of a temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the Elli's project based on zoning-related matters. Key outstanding matters that must still be addressed in the Elli's project include the (1) completion of restoration and partial reconstruction of the old facades and (2) HPC's review and approval of the swamp coolers on the rooftop. It appears that the facade treatment is proceeding according to HPC's amended approval; however, powerwashing, painting and repositioning of the wood columns on Mill Street have not been completed. This work must be completed according to approved plans prior to issuance of final Certificate of Occupancy. An application for HPC's approval of the swamp coolers has not yet been received by the Planning Office. A complete application should be submitted no later than Monday, December 14th so we can schedule the matter for HPC's regular meeting of December 22, 1987. If no plan for dealing with the swamp coolers is received by the Planning Office or if the plan is not approved by HPC within 30 days, then we may be forced to advise the Building Inspector to revoke any temporary Certificate of Occupancy issued on the basis of this matter being resolved. Other aspects of the project that must be inspected prior to issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy include the land- scaping and exterior architectural design of the new portion of the building. The Parks Department will need to inspect the landscaping and report on its completion to the Building Depart- ment. Of course, the Planning Office has no involvement with building code aspects of the matter as they may effect temporary and final Certificates of Occupancy. If you have any questions please contact me. Sincerely, 5 414 63 *294 sb.e12.10.2 Steve Burstein, Planner CC: Jim Wilson, Chief Building Inspector MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Wilson, Chief Building Inspector FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Elli's Restoration Plan Amendment DATE: November 23, 1987 I have reviewed a letter from Heidi Hoffmann dated November 23, 1987 and attached drawings illustrating the restoration plan approved by HPC on November 19. The plans meet HPC's approval and should be allowed to proceed for consideration by the Building Department. Three areas of clarification are: (1) The note on the Mill Street elevation stating "Patch to meet north cornice" should be clarified. John Cottle verbally explain- ed that "patch" means minor repair in the area of the joint in order to make a good miter joint. This is acceptable. (2) The note on the Mill Street elevation stating "Typical areas where the siding removed for crane strap" should be clarified as to whether removal of boards was already done or would be a new area to be removed. Cottle has clarified that this was done in the past. Any further replacement would only occur after notifi- cation to the Planning Office. (3) The alternating courses of new siding with siding from other areas of the north side would apply to the entire patch area on the east side of the Main Street wall. The applicant also should inform the Planning Office where the old boards are to be removed as the work progresses. sb.e.11.13 ap,70/0 2 0/006,6 ~aMOVe 77Â»S ok> rr opot , 11 -- 1 , 14 , 1 1 . f Asvi ofTIe N '5 WOOLE> FREM Â©ve Â·el../Â· .. V 14. . 'ayÂ» 0, mage Uums. - 4 ! ' ..t , C Tal ip. E lia' tr 1 ~111#t ..1 4. 1 - 12- 4='.t --- 1 8401715 Â£300005- /22'87 \Â¢1< 76#85â‚¬6~3Wae, HAGMAN YAW MEMORANDUM ARCHITECTS DEC 2 1 ,987 i LTD ~ Â· 210 SOUTH GALENA I ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Date: December 18, 1987 303/925-2867 To: Steve Burstein From: Heidi Hoffmann 07 Subject: Addition to Elli's Please be assured that the following items will be installed per the plans. 1. Storefront grill work: the two storefront doors at Elli's will have the existing grill work re-installed. The third storefront door at the Revillon space will not. The grill work from those doors has been refitted and adorn the dressing room doors within the Elli's space. 2. Awnings: Per the Restoration Plan of June 19, we are installing awnings exactly like the existing; only they will be a different color. The existing awnings were dirty and difficult to retract and were deemed unusable. 3. The exterior lighting at the new building has a) been installed incorrectly - they should be pointing up and b) are meant only to wash the upper walls with light. When correctly positioned they should appear unobtrusive. There will be gas lights at the inset stairway entry to the new Pinions Restaurant and decorative fixtures either side of the Northwest entry to Sushi Masa entry. These fixtures have not been picked as yet. He,J;, 71â‚¬41â‚¬ U 74*4Â£ th.t PL Ii,44;.j f;x Nrt $ ad B.e w 06Â»47) Atk Ad,1,4 :04 1,1 ,b<I,Zte.k.J fe,~tv,f, ,1,07% +D ~ PC (pritâ€¢<-f~ 'f<'Ovt)Â· Off|â€¢Ir,fe.+ 4 0,;i'Â·a) 4.h,ny $11â€ž1, L S t-* f-f .MMAJ- i w,,1,1 I i14 6/tk d.v,ir d., 4 On 4 Fi.h, 14/3 (ir. not 54;41 14 10Â· 1(.~-Aâ€ž p tte '419 01, 13,6 /00>, 'W),hl, iÂ»'17â‚¬h,) Â¢ DEC 2 1 -- - ,98( .1 18 December 1987 1 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD ----- - 1 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Mr. Steve Burstein 303/925-2867 Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Addition to Elli's (Updated Restoration Plan) Dear Steve: This letter is to inform the members of HPC that we have repositioned the existing columns at the Elli facade. During demolition, the six 8" square columns were numbered, removed and stored. Their condition was poor with dry rot at the base. We determined that since they were not structural, it was possible to restore and reuse. Restoration included cutting the depth of the column with a beam saw to fit in front of the new structure. The dry rot at the base was cut out. In a few columns almost 18" had to be removed. As new 1x redwood trim boards were to be used at the base matching the old design, no one would see the actual column base. Please see attached detail elevation. The old paint will be scraped off and the columns sanded, primed and repainted. Power washing has proved not possible to do at this time of year. Power washing involves a high pressure water spray that at low temperatures could penetrate the wood and freeze. The paint would not hold. Instead the facades and the columns will all be handscraped and then sanded. Although this process will take longer, we will achieve the same end result. I am confident the Members of HPC will welcome this additional restoration instead of replication of the old columns. Thank you for your concern. Very truly yours, 1-In~ *C Heidi H. Hoffmann AIA Project Manager HHH:sv enclosure cc: Can-Am Partnership Jim Wilson/Aspen Bldg. Dept. Shaw Construction 0 1111111111 111111111 . N â‚¬Aers Resr \--_S 7 N 4 '' --0 , -Â·11 ' 4 APP -cAl 6â‚¬)6750 '~1 4+ 4 --44 - . -1ol NEW I K 't?9~ AT ..},f FGM;Â¤EC> ,/ r-J 2+ ~455 tE_ r- h 1 10 . I , f Â· AU TR/.4 /9 #41,4/rE= C-)aULA 2620 60â‚¬/ff/C<PLATE ket-29~7/Ok./. Lif - ~ - -- - -- - -35 1. IN .P,4 11/,12 B.I'/'1~11,1111, 18 December 1987 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA NEC 2 1987 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Mr. Steve Burstein Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Addition to Elli's Dear Steve: Per an earlier discussion in the field, I am submitting a drawing of a proposed change to the West Elevation of the Elli's Addition (at the Miner's Building). Due to the future occupancy of the Sushi Masa Restaurant at Space 109, we would like to add a pair of storefront doors with sidelites. With an occupancy above 50 people, they will be required to have to exits. I have enclosed a drawing to illustrate this design. Thank you for this consideration. Very truly yours, Heidi H. Hoffmann AIA Project Manager HHH:sv enclosures cc: Can-Am Partnership Jim Wilson/Aspen Building Dept. " , -- 21 4 Â·Â·t - ,--Â·-- -- ill - -- 43+771 /-' 1 1 i L *fITA 1-!21 - 1 1 /04-1 m r-U \ 1 - f ME LOCATE H 2,/00. 1 / ' 1 L,/-<S 704 /,41 If 2 j 13{\ ;1132 56347)-, adÂ·'6, F~ i li 31\ \\ W, f.C ., . PU , 4 \\ r \ 4 cene' oÂ®viu. p)00 -- - /431>,\ fh , 41 ~94/030(*/ 64/DS p-/ 14 \ \\@\ 49 1 11\ M /*% /72-1 YA 4\ (3**97 /6\ ek GUAL'< F L (J__, a.-~ ~ 1 (*M-1 - 1 11,1 . 0 1 1 X -1 1 r K Â£ 417 1 , e. 4 3 Â· ' (10 \ r - .. : ,;0 â€¢t b f L. 4 4 1 , \ #- - r 13 42 34 W .2.-Lt 10Â£:93 4 + 1 Â« =74.2 /0/,3 -E f r- n 4 U , u 'Er-E Al Lns- B r r (/1,~9 52F#, - j I Y . f 40 j *-- .1. 44 I /'.a f A ' . -<-1 \ k 1 iT - i 0 45 '1.-/Â· ..913 3.104.4. 5*, Â»4/5 - .â‚¬1-19 ' 1 -1 - , - 0 . . N 0 2 1 -1 - 6, C.DJO 4- , J. 2 / L Â·31 id 1 1 2 -- L Al . 7 0, 1 FL 01 6 1\. 1\3 -1- 6lcil ki a 0 9 29 /1 1 -/-Â· + 6. - 9L 0 'f ' Â· i 1 5 1 4 321 - - E-4 4.- - -- tA 4-4 +-1-. 4- 4 1 ' 2,5-7 22-/, 1, +1/-5 i . .0.- r 1 /4 ff. 4-, /1,4~ r IJ*236 Z SIDE U TE P(-AN e. I / 2:1 : ' ... &.... :-I..... -:.m- I . .-I .*- -* ;431*'PRÂ¥4' 1.2 1.7 Â¢Ftivi,0 ....2 5 04 el/;/ 2 4 *(04 Â·1~ -t 1 / A -- MAA 1 ,-1 . 1 - ./47 66 ---- Jith 97 -- \197 A ----4 /1\ 1 7 \\ 1 1 - \ i ' '1 *LJMJUGS NAT r Doz . 1 9, h . MACT]ve. 2,3. - I -\ 4// 1 4 1 / 1 ..-/ 1 l-<2%5-3 6-0 K 7-2 76 W/ /-2*5-8 All)<F<Â»15 / (Â»12) AST"GAL - - (TEM?Â» v,M'E - .. / 1 A'*, pâ‚¬. ileors 4244 -74' PE ' 2>l - 0 f E> i p, 11 P ME.1.19.-alâ‚¬FEETif -'3 -"ED: 144 '1 SroME FmÂ©k]T Doom 9 _ '3Â¢DEL/TES 1 0 4,1 t 1 L 1 il 11 --- -.1 1-0 <P F I V. #l - 4. .l, 42 - V. . I S ' DEC I 6 1987 C J 4 1 1/ 1 J HAGMAN YAW 15 December 1987 O h De<.tz,;917 ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Mpillâ€¢n,4 303/925-2867 Members of the HPC City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Addition to Elli's Dear HPC Members: This letter and its attachments provides you with the information we have gathered in regards to your concerns raised at the November 19 meeting. After much investigation and study, we have three options available for your review. Please be reminded that the coolers, ductwork, and building design were already in place before the Committee expressed an interest to review. To address the visual impact of the three evaporative coolers, we offer three alternatives for your review and comment. ( Please refer to the attached drawings): 1. Alternate #1: Option "A". Screen the three evaporative coolers as they exist with a wooden fence that will match the new siding and be painted light grey. This will visually screen the equipment from its predominant viewpoint along Main Street, east of the intersection. As it is under the viewplane, you cannot see the equipment from the front steps of the Hotel Jerome. Option "B" would be to build a parapet at the existing roof extending north and then stepping down. See elevation. 2. Alternate #2: Option "A". Relocate unit A to the high roof towards the southwest corner; relocate unitÂ· B to unit A location and relocate unit C to unit B location. Unit C duet work (approx. 32" H x 30" W) would extend east and then south to hook up into the existing chase duct work. New duct work would also extend north from the new unit A location until it turned down and penetration into a suitable chase space. Note that unit A location at the high roof is within the viewplane. An option "Blt to this Alternate would be to relocate unit C further west and extend ductwork along the roof until it meets the existing penetration. 47,81 -'i~| *"11|JIJ|! ..1- Letter to Members of the HPC 15 December 1987 Page Two 3. Alternate #3: Relocates unit A to the High roof again but moves unit B further to the West and unit C to the original unit A location. Duet work form unit C would then go into the original unit B penetration. Thank you for these considerations. Very truly yours, Hagman Yaw Architects, Ltd la/1/1/Y- Heidi Hoffmann AIA Project Manager 1 VU VJ- & (John Cottle AIA *artner HH:aa Enclosures 4) 90) 9 6.7 + f ... ... p C t-- ' 2/1 4- 1 '. '. 1 1..0.1 ,1 1 1 \1- '.4 2.f/%1)(_L ko- ./.3 i 11 RAH - lit ' }I . - .3- '1' ' - 1 ' F L A,4 C 5 ) 1-// 1.j h 64.6, Ar in .... . . -- f ,Â·4 ..7Â£Â·â€¢. 1 1 0 E.</33.'Ne t I 1 0 . 1 /--h FAMA f.)â‚¬.T 1.12(t- C A -- -- -wryâ‚¬O/r â‚¬-PAIÂ·?-Al:>ET (31 6/331RJ. 1- - j 't ' -7-' ?,a r -, 1. ALT.*1 Ophbn "A" EL L I '6 AC>o>J 11. 11' 5/ 1 0 1 b' 1 1 il ILl: M i 1 . /1 1 : 41 i , 1 11 - i; 1,1 1 1 1 1, : 1 1 1 1 -- 1 1 1 1 1 j It, , liu , 1.1 ,\! .1 'b i i Al 4 ' 9, .1 1 1 i i --_ 4 41 1 11, --1- 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 :1 1 1 11 1 1 1 III . . lit. 1 1.1 : , .:; .1 -1 lb; M i ~ 2 1 L 7/5 I l = 1 1 - Mill ji m.. li- i : ~ I Â«14'; Â·f; r.-r .- j n 1% 1 ill , 'll U. .-ON- 1 lili 1, 41. 9,11!11 111 1 1 1 1 - - 1 - Â·D 1 {1;111* , i -1 1 ! +4: 1 1 i l u i I i 4 4 11 El 2. /'Th 11 ;1 i . 11 1 -- V 4 1 1 ~ i 1 11 3 1 1 1 11:1 1' '1 ' 1 1 1 1111:III , i (1Â·' 9 1 -=1 1 - r. T I ... -1. I 7 - '~ -1 L 1 1 11 ,1 1 1 1 1 ;1.---1. , 1 1, ! t,\1 1 :Afl 1 1 i 1,1 0 9.4-9, 4/ 1.11 /31 il ' V - ''- - -- 1 3 -. 4.:4 i ht-i; ~ -d I q 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 , i il ..2 1 .' 1,1 1 :11! 111 1 411 ix# 1 4; - ). i. 'iii A 1 ..4 1 - 1 . 1 11 1 T Ulv .: 1 23 - 4. A| 1 U' 1 1 1 1 1 ! 11 ~ 1- 1 i a 1 .1 1111 .-- ),1 1 1 1 1 i 4 L-1 ': i i i 1 1 6 41 ---------1 1 1 11 1 t'! ! e- i El i / 1 1 Jj =... d. 1.1 1 1 1 . -8 1 1 1 r - 4 4 ~I :I 7-j~Â»Â«13 1 Â« p 1 NT- F. 1 1 1 4 1 fw 42 1 4 1 1~ 1 U,J 4 *4 i L 3, I. 2 11 iIi 1- .. %4 1 1 11 A: 4 '11 1,1 r L 2 3 1 -1 1 1 1 -- - -- - 1 1 1-1. TE [, i i ilti.I_ Ell~-l.J T I 1 ; 1 1-,L .2- --, { .- - - i ir l <i-1 1-1 F[ -_2--l[-ti--0 ~ ~ i 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 --- 1-1 1 111 (41'-4 -4-l[1 EN L _ 11 L~' 1 :'' I '4 + OATH EMAAN 61 ., 6.-6 ... D-Â·: NOILVA272 C .. MAI# ] Offaer 1 ~ 1 ------ 5,6, 51 1/1 46 0 Or-#ciar fr (TYP) 1#.--7 6.L.~ 12 6Â«)11-02- 129 \A Or EvAR \L_ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ oF. -1/IM.,lf",LAOâ‚¬ 06= 20'Tliwe I DIC-- VMENct,0,4,6. fÂ·2eDTA)004,0 CQi.) ift \ \ F.LE.-7*Of<A KI 1 842)/Fâ€¢ 3 1 |*ibd'82 J r 1 1\ \\ ~ l,AIL..0/ki.3 64 ir,)Â·7,~~~) - 9.EKL,~r->4, U'Â·Â·44*T- 804)ip. â‚¬49 VNra-*g V 06 - V leac-Â»le bUU heW / | 4, LÂ· -7 Â· ~~0-b41"A~'~ 50 ret n fklet plep et- 4Â© 1 \\ -4 3 5-0 416Â» 1 Wjh nof- f 4 - ti-i 16 -1 15- -1 ZÂ©2;triâ‚¬ L k % ~ NOOF ,Â¥7655 ) L ---4 1- Â· -3 1-- J \ j \\ Ity i i 1- - ~ kâ‚¬VA-ID R ~ -- 1 0 --- .'- 5,6. . -I.--I- -Ilill - -I-*Ill-Fl-*- ~ ~ - ...1-1. ----..-.-I ...I---- -I-/ I--I- t C/Â¥09Â·17,4)63 1 ~Al, 9. Vetâ‚¬KAL CtÂ·946: AFGA Ill & 1 5 Â· c, H BH ADOFÂ· 6 r, '-47-1 ACTEF+JAE =ff 1 (522 2150 o.tadled , SOOr= P-t AN 64 Piuy\Wal &4*Â· j Offi rn 11 K ADDITION TO ELLJ' S (Ph>1 4,11 - f//kit j Orf6W- 11 5,6, 9 / 1,4 46, 6*761,95'r (rif) 3 Feal 1 1 ! 4 : COOLE&14- 1* W th- EVAR 04 -vlkâ€ž114~,AlÂ·153 47 -1 ~~Ir cal.)IR h L 1-u/. T-toN nf: -EVIV,<63 1 ~~C-- VieNCLâ€ž~VJâ‚¬ '\\ P.LE:UTAU,4-A KI-1 EQ)/p, \ ~ ''' 1 ) 1\ ~~ itÂ·/17',* -'.--- ~~S<iN 601 3//9 7,- f 1 Oft-Â«t-/FLawe \Â« 1 4,6, _1_1 \\Ah Reloate_ 2 Of\OV\ 10, 8 \IN#43 EVAPOMATNE \:. ~ ~, Ng?f= /Â«CES ) ~ V-~ 't. 0- 14Â· >. Un.PLâ‚¬ 4 5 ~r- D . L - - 1 2-'b 4 3-c' Av Ai r 1\ J(A ) (el i \\ 1 *on " 0' -Â·j -<-- <-- ~ ECEVAUD K 5,6, .- 0 1,<-7 (/46Â«/ 907 2/yâ€¢. r. 9 Ve~ 7*54 4.-0. C,9456 /244 3 1 1 ok-Vigwplant Alaf-FATE + 2- .4:0'-â‚¬1~' *OOF PLAN *bvt "All -- -- ADDITION TO â‚¬34.U'O 2 744 441'oy' 11 Mil . ... f441/1 1 OTfaer , ----- i 1 51 6, F, 611697 (92 | 1 VII 11511 & \\. . 6 Coy,-Ee- 75 >6 14- g 44:61 0 Â¥ - - V 1 E V 191. A OG PEEDYAOBANT Callft Ily/. 7/061 0= 20'TUM 6 1 DIC- VieNRAS ALe.LS#V (KA k' 1 89)/Ft I ' U 1 21 1 2,d~lÂ»Â·~U* AFL *FRJ- SESÂ·7>4+44* 60/ 1//9 \\ 06- VE#/fLANE 1 -7- 1 61-, tic*~(Te\DCAS{- \jr-- -1-4 r 1 1* - -1 1.5- 1 EVAPOM,Ar/vE \\ 011 /476%1 3 / L/ C ~ 1 1/1 1 1 Ch::>0542= \ yl ~----I---- ~-25 _1 L -2 \\ 1- - /--1 1 - iaâ‚¬VATD K --I.- -IL><1- 5,L, 2 1 \ 1Â»04/72/ 1/.,AL,9f Veâ‚¬7<AL Ct-W,6 AraGA I , 1 01 15, u,, .-'. ( U -< *fprovi AlliphAft,4 19/ Â»Â«24 40 'k 40,1 0 f / h, fl j #4 E j -4 1/F,) 64 4 1" c AN| + f'ihigh 48'ff"'' I 50 4 1#r dvdÂ£ IND'k 1 1 ~ 1 12 d 4 j ttr,~1).13 1% r #-7, 632tleLy..1 |~ Ab<â€žJh~*A,&1 F-OOF PLAri k vt <1 1 4 Atom>/7110'P.J TO â‚¬(17'6 dE i/Cd ~p 64 4 8, tr A t,te, Vt{ s Â¥6*f (4(1441 A R o vi . MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Response to Phil Holstein's Comments on Elli's DATE: December 3, 1987 Phil Holstein, one of the owners of Elli's, made some comments about the review process at Council's November 23, 1987 meeting which you requested me to respond to. Following are my comments: 1. Phil stated that prior to making any applications, the prospective owners asked City staff how to proceed on developing the Elli's property and that he was encouraged to keep the building. It is true that we encouraged the applicant to keep the existing structure. It was understood that there was to be some enlargement, and staff brought to the owners' attention the likely issues of the compatibility of the addition's size, style and location, and removal of trees. At that time there was no understanding that only the facades would be saved and a new structure would be built. Not until late into the review process was the plan for saving the facades presented; prior to that the assumption 1 was that the building would remain standing and rehabili- tated as necessary. 2. Phil stated that the facade treatment cost the owners more money that saved by not paying for employee housing through GMP. We cannot evaluate this statement. Alan estimated that the employee housing cash-in-lieu payment would have been between $132,000 (middle income) and $294,000 (low income). 3. It was stated that the project build-out was well below the maximum allowed floor area (FAR) for the site. The following chart compares FAR on the Elli's site: Approved Plan Max. FAR 1.5:1* Max.FAR 2:1** Square 12,069 13,571 18,094 Feet FAR 1.34 1.5 2.0 * External floor area ratio. ** External floor area with .5 bonus floor area ratio, subject to Planning and Zoning Commission special review approval which would require provision of 0.3 employee housing on-site. This fact has nothing to do with the use of the historic landmark GMP exemption, which could have achieved the same level of buildout. 4. Phil stated that they followed the approval process to the letter, and contacted staff every time there was any problem. The applicant has been cooperative and did contact me on a number of problem areas. Certain aspects of the project, including a request to replace the walls (allegedly rotten, burned and not original), replacement of asbestos sheathing, the amendment to patch the walls because of dimensional errors, and treatment Of the roofline and rooftop mechanical equipment have been very problematic, and may have been avoided if more information had been presented prior to final approval. Moreover, these problems are not at all typical of restoration projects; they are unique to Elli's. I hope that this memorandum responds to the points in a manner that is helpful to you. Please contact me if you have any more questions. SB.12.3 2 --. i-I - - -1-- - -- . - - ur-1 I i :Lui- _ I ~=tu *ia~ E /-1 01 1 7 --7. I- r. il- --! 'j i L i rp k, - -=1(.- . I - . 1 ki T ..C- 1- 1 ~ , (4154= ~-Â«-3.%\ 1 :1 j V, V 1.6 r 2. 4 1 : -I--l r ~ / l ,~ . ii /2,74 2 0 " w - 1,1-LL+Li ==~ - -4-A c E r 00(13 6 YU b -VERTICAL WOOD SIDING STOREEBONT ALTERNA-TE- 246 61 d ~/4'J X ASPEN*PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDINd-DEPARTIVIENT 14 1. dy li Li t/ |2 1 i %21 1/91 [f 1 NW 80 1987 11 1 1Â¢ A November 27, 1987 Mr. John Cottle Miss Heidi Hoffman Hagman Yaw Architects 210 S. Galena Aspen, CO. 8i611 RE: Elli's Building Permit #10537 Dear' .lohn & Heidi ; Plans suimitted for Tenant Finish within space 105, Ell i's building by Mr. Chris Trautner for Revi] lon 1 ne. show exiting through a corridor not shown on plans approved under permit #]0537. The corridor occurs approximately between lines C & i) along line (6). As discrissed previously, such changes to the approved plan set must be made by change order by submitting plans and details outlining such changes. All such change orders must he approved and issued before cailing for inspections including those items;. In addition, if you are aware of other areas of the project that have been constructed or are proceeding contrary to the approved Flans , please submit these changes now so as to allow sufficient time for review and approval. if this is in arty,lay 1-]Ticl~r, 41Â« Exu miner RW/tw Ce: Gary Star, Shaw Construction Steve Burstein, Planning Elli's.rw offices: mail address: 517 East Hopkins Avenue 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-5973 Aspen, Colorado 81611 F'+-e:'I-â€¢. Vt U.-- â€¢ J:,4.,6'.2 ASPEN*PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DEPAR-rIVIENT Â· i... t... * -'' Z November 20, 1987 194*71. Shaw Construction ...:/. 111 Kalamath Denver, CO : *Vt,(6Â·C, ' v .' XEN:0. Attn: Mr. Gary Star' <Ac <5'. Re: Permit # 10537 101 S. Mill St. 449 ' Can-Am Aspen Development, Inc. /46% 2#5: 7: <6~*Â«1 - ' ..4 r. ...4 .i, Dear Mr. Star, 4 *f*' . . - I ' .... . I Â¢041â‚¬Â·- This letter shall serve notice that the stop work orderr' issued on November 10, 1987 by this department is hereby rea- - cinded effective this date. 1 10 . As such, tenant finish currently under permit may proceed. ''Vhl Work proposed to the facade will need to be reviewed and : approved by this department prior to starting work thereon. Please submit changes by change order.in this regard. Such a procedure has been discussed with John Cottle of Hagman-Yaw Architects, who is proceeding accordingly. If this is in anyway unclear, please call. ~ Y * r s tru~, ~ JÂ«,Robert Weien Ac~ng Building Official . URW: 10 CC: Jim Wilson John Cottle Steve Burstein '.: .AL '... . I .- '' offices: mail address: 4517 East HopkineAvenue 506 East Main Street 7--"I 'Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-5973 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Â·..i.I :Â·t'' C.. 23 November 1987 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS NOV 2 3 1987 LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Mr. Steve Burstein It l'i . 5 303/925-2867 Aspen Planning Department 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Elli's Updated Restoration Plan Dea r Steve: The attached drawings illustrate our updated restoration plan per the November 19th HPC meeting. We will incorporate Georgeann Waggaman's suggestion of using existing siding from other parts of the north wall for patching at the northeast corner. Also, I have inventoried and noted on the drawings other areas that are either damaged or missing siding/trim. So that the restoration can move forward as quickly as possible, I have copied the Building Department in on this plan. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours, 4-194(li- Heidi H. Hoffmann AIA Project Manager HHH:sv enclosures cc: Jim Wilson/Aspen Building Dept. Shaw Construction CAN-AM Partnership .111111111 I. i. q 1 ,Â£ .4- PI .4' 1#-1.ill. 'dc-/ 4 1 *-~'1Â»1 -* 241 4 . . _Fr ,1 -. 41 ~ 1 4 71 Mave coRN toe TO - -- * 4 1~ L'i ,- I~ b i Come 6/2-, /9*&7Â£-O soon-\ a)O 3 Fâ‚¬ Tute,J -- P IRALL hi E-9- REW (074 -rm M 1/1 -% --i 427772 U/-73;-*... p~ Ned 5%39% - PATEHED Â»J -1Â»61Â£ 4 - 1 ,_J Rete>UIUD HEADEM- PER ARCHIT~6.crtÂ¥2_AL f..8/. 7 1 ' PRAIJ, NGS -7/2-4./g,1 r /. , . - r elt . 8140 5TREET NALL @__SE_CLTVVER 3Â£1 4 <M % prEUT?WS 129- Pitf/h M la MAnt Â£2615 /1#W 2041{ 86- --1 3~~&119<j~g~~~4 FL61+h Ur m '2.L - C. - -.--1.4-.--.----~- -L . â‚¬11.-- r. -Z=.0- *31Â£41.--- - - ' , ) CAJA#76/*.,73~.. - I -.-. . I. 1 , -=2-- r- I â€ž. Â· J 1 1.,1 ELI .l' . 2.=1.-1 I Â·Â»VÂ· P - 1 1 4.-.Â» Â»4://1. 2.- - -*- h.ne-_._=. .-9 1, 4 l: IL 7- 19~3//2,4.//a 7-- :17.-2.-t-~= 2-47.11 .,,41..,.1. 0~,1 DIC~1 ' ~ _~ ...â€ž--Â¥1't=,-â€ž-m. ~ r.:ELEECALTS.4.=*Ed /1~ 2-1 - - - Â·Â· , - 1 - - -./.- 7 -./... g-*...47; -I. - 4-ytd er US ekkt - 51661>~- rt~to-vul fk GraN,L 5/mo - - Â· - -- #' . * - ~ %.,-3:-2-:1-31~-22-,2 fzz.-f.A>3 4,4/:TWEf 3 - - . - - .- ..0 :.:Â·~t:f>,,4.* ,-~ . - . ,;-93 --3..32-#*Air,-.-6.:13 I , . 4-4 23 . 74 ., . L - 4 ..r.. . . -- I - .. 6- . $- * 7..'Â£&:- I-;44-1<72#..*. Â· ' ' 4 ---â€¢ 1 ' T/27,>1 - 17 .Ir .. 1 liAGMAN YAW 27 October 1987 ARCHITECTS I 11) 210 SOUTH GALENA , ASITN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Mr. Steve Meyer i Shaw Construction 743 Horizon Court, Suite 109 Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 Re: Elli's Dear Steve: This letter is to relate painting instructions for the existing walls on the Elli's project: 1. All boards which are damaged will be repaired and nailed securely into place by Shaw Construction. 2. Boards which are severely damaged and absolutely cannot be repaired will need to be replaced. If a board needing replacement is long enough to be partially saved, then it should be cut at a stud and partially saved. All boards which need to be replaced need to have prior approval of the planning office. This should be accomplished on site with a prior scheduled meeting with Steve Burstein and Heidi Hoffrnann. All replacement boards need to exactly duplicate the piece which they replace in every way. 3. Siding and trim will be powerwashed and scraped to remove loose paint chips. The painting subcontractor needs to take extreme caution to avoid damaging any boards during this process (which he has assured me is possible to do.) Some isolated boards which have accumulated many layers of paint and severe weather checking will need to be stripped; this can be called out on a board by board basis at the site. 4. Bare wood spots will then be primed and the entirety of the walls repainted. All parties should realize that this process will not produce a "new" appearing building; all old siding, trim and paint cracks, bulges and irregularities will show through. Thank you. Sincerely, 044'U Uuv*L I John Cottle AIA ~ Partner J C:sv CC: Heidi Houston Phil Holstein Steve Burstein Heidi 1-Inffmann Dave Reams t 0 - 0 Â© 0 61(-ME.E.T'+~ 1 . 1 E\.AM 48 ORiff 4% MIPDLE F.00 F H /*H ROOF- .-791 Eo H., Ga U I F? 22(?FLE. E.1<1 F LAti AV H = 1 274 U ~iLAY)'i cil Ef, 'fS ty,~ 0 -0 i ---) EVAFer:'.ANVE c.09 LEÂ«- - -*'.-,1 'r/@'; 2 1 - F- -. 4 ..~--.-~%i. i,I, 1 --Se/SLED 9,i'Clr#6- /A,i'Tck EFFTING i-BooF Vl- PARAPET (il â‚¬KS'~6. - 4* bily-op-f. ECRd;MAGNT 5.0..Eti- Ed-_ 2-15\077/0/9 E LLI '6 App>4 11.17 027 ASPEN*PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDINU ~EPARTIVIENT L Gkfif97~fi- ~ 2,4 1987 4 N November 20, 1987-----~.~ Shaw Construction 111 Kalamath Denver, CO 4 Attn: Mr. Gary Star Re: Permit # 10537 101 S. Mill St. Can-Am Aspen Development, Inc. Dear Mr. Star, This letter shall serve notice that the stop work order issued on November 10, 1987 by this department is hereby res- cinded effective this date. As such, tenant finish currently under permit may proceed. Work proposed to the facade will need to be reviewed and approved by this department prior to starting work thereon. Please submit changes by change order in this regard. Such a procedure has been discussed with John Cottle of Hagman-Yaw Architects, who is proceeding accordingly. ,e , If this is in anyway unclear, please call. \ Y urs ru y, t ~3*,Robert Weien Ad~ng Building Official JRW: 10 CC: Jim Wilson 4 John Cottle L Steve Burstein offices: mail address: 517 East Hopkins Avenue 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-5973 Aspen, Colorado 81611 % MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Insubstantial Modification of Elli's Walls Plan: Patch on Mill Street Elevation DATE: December 4, 1987 I have reviewed a request from Heidi Hoffmann to add new cornice board and new siding patched in to the northeast corner of Elli's Mill Street facade. The plan revision calls specifically for adding approximately 3" to 6" to the cornice and top board, to add approximately 3" to the top 3 1/2 feet of the siding, and to replace the 1"X4" vertical trim board (width same as original) . The siding at the bottom of the northeast corner may need to be cut a small amount (not to exceed 3")soto make the wall plumb. All the new siding will be staggered old and new to minimize the visual impact. The attached sketch dated 12/4/87 prepared by Heidi Hoffmann shows the plan. Based on my review of the regulations, I find that the proposal constitutes an insubstantial modification of the approved restoration plan (as amended by HPC's approval on November 19, 1987). I spoke with HPC Chairman Bill Poss about this request to find out whether he wanted this matter brought forward for HPC's reconsideration; and he stated that he did not. I recommend that you approve the requested insubstantial modification of the approved development plan pursuant to Section 24-9.6(a) of the Municipal Code. If you so approve, please sign the signature block below. The applicant is herein advised that any future deviations to the approved plan must also be brought to the Planning Office's attention. I hereby approve the requested insubstantial modification of the Elli's restoration plan. Alan - Ribhman, Planning and Development Director cc: Heidi Hoffmann, Project Manager, Hagman Yaw Architects John Palmer, Building Official Historic Preservation Committee sb.e12.4 . u ...... Afl r\91 An4 ybrij * De Â®EfÂ·ja fÂ« E u---4 1 L.vu V \ 7 -1 42 bol 2- 1"1 3 +44 1 .31.-- i 4.-aw<_ Jitt~~U.â‚¬- 40=:tr- 2% ) tkwht- i 9 -0 1 h.6,-r - I h 0 ~727 9 1 rv, 66 coGr-- - Ectolj w-uv~ 14 =0- t 1/1 1256 5Â«91 /3\1 + Ma,b 1 9.1 ru/cÂ£4>514/l/l go LCALL ) 9.,1 4/%1 4 1 / h CASE DISPOSITION ELLI'S RESTORATION PLAN AMENDMENT On November 19, 1987 HPC approved the following requested changes to the Elli's restoration plan: (1) replacement of the cornice piece facing Main Street that is rotten, starting the new piece approximately 4 feet back, and (2) treatment of the Mill Street wall at the southeast corner to install new siding where damaged or missing as amended to mix new boards and old boards as presented at the meeting, move the existing cornice to the south corner and add a new piece approximately one foot long, and install a 6 1/4" vertical trim board along the south edge of the historic storefront, and (3) the Main Street plan of alterations. HPC approved a motion to recommend to the Building Department to remove the stop work order (red tag) at this time. HPC approved a motion to table action on the proposed screening of roof-top mechanical equipment until the applicant comes back with further study of different location, height and screening of the equipment. sb.ell.19.2 MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Drueding, Building Department FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Elli's Roof-top Equipment DATE: April 20, 1988 This memo is to inform you that HPC approved on April 12, 1988 the new roof-top equipment proposed for the Sushi Masa Restaurant on top of the Elli's Building subject to the conditions that: 1. The equipment shall not exceed 37" in height. 2. The equipment will be painted out. At that meeting HPC considered the most easterly duct leading from the swamp cooler and the Pinion' s equipment and did not take any action on either. The determination was that these were acceptable minor deviations from the approved plan. Please consider this information in evaluating a building permit application for the Sushi Masa equipment and the request for a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. cc: Laura Onsgard, Building Department Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Specialist Heidi Hoffmann, Hagman Yaw Architects e.4.20 MEMORANDUM TO: Laura Onsgard, Building Department FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Status of Ellils Rooftop Equipment DATE: March 9, 1988 The Historic Preservation Committee is scheduled to review the roof-top mechanical equipment on the Elli's Building at their March 22, 1988 meeting. Specifically, HPC Will review the swampcooler ducts installed (deviating from the approved location) and the Sushi Masa restaurant equipment (not yet designed, according to the architect). If an application is not submitted for the restaurant equipment then HPC will not be able to finalize their review of the project. I hope this information is helpful for you in evaluating what "type" of Certificate Of Occupancy is appropriate for the project. 13 April 1988 APR 1 5 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Steve Burstein 303/925-2867 Planning Office City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Addition to Elli's Dear Steve: Now that Elli's rooftop mechanical equipment has been approved, would you please notify the Building Department. The Owner would like to obtain a final Certificate of Occupancy. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, 8Â£21 ELA-~ Heidi H. Hoffmann AIA Project Manager HHH:sv CC: Can Am &11111111111!11111 1*1,1 Orfee"F ...1 . 9, 6, 4,6, ~ Or-foleir (rff) 129Â· A Or EvAR F or, -VIE,18,402 -- Ar Pecrivfvqjr â‚¬10\,)1F1 ,~4 L.7./.7/06; c;:2071â€ž6,62 1 OF-- Vi'Ehjui./'AE'.,-. . -i . 1. I euu)(03 /42. St.Al - SEK>774(/MANT. 80/ 4/9 ftic Fowa-#IÂ·Mil ac, - 9 th/FLANe buiw KeW / | 6, L, 7 FP#t "A" 1 5cren .A,ne,L puaperk i 5-0 1*161+ - 24 - 3 te- 3 E.- 1 EiNvaeg,Ar,vef ~ $32Â» 2456-693 ) 1 I f. 1 000,-622'3 1 1.- -1 1-- J \\ -1 7 * 865VA-ID R | - --- 1 5,L. 9- ----7-bj CUL.:R/ Zo.2/;16 '77 VeR73540 Ctiâ€¢,55 AFGA k .1 1 1 5Â·i..,' HIGH Moo p Ncy-0-4 ACT[EAP-ATE_ 11: 1 (562 NGO Â«40464 \ SOOF p LA]\i - - 5llfflt0ntvll'Al, dwfl) Opt#,1 "A" ADO'rION TO ef . 1.3,0 g flitb't *1311 4 411 1 --7 0 0 Phi , '-1 1--4 1 / 11 ~ L__~j j' Fl - i - j , 43 f 'FÂ·4 1 31 d 1 1 D . 0 0 318" rn J 2'' 11 1% 11 1 3 , SopA . .1 + 46 L $11 0 COFFEE. 16 SAL . 1 U ." 1 2 4 91 0 '1 K .1 151 15 DUCT 0 2. 111 9, 7- .263 40"X 82 ' - Z f DAYTOW 7CZ 87 JAW -~ E.Â»1AU (ST DISCHARGEF VE,4,2.4Â£y / l:~~5 c 4 - 1 22 MOO2 Z. 461(463 . d 10 1 - f-2 9 10 KI~HEN YA-Â·1 'DAFT#f Zeâ‚¬Â«4 FA e 1--7 Â¥ r. 1 ..4 41 - Dic#"\3 2 1 1 3- 1 WO> r p 11 DRIS#â€¢17â€¢Ler' W ~ 1 ICE: =1 H L.li \ /4 5< / 4.## \ .69 FFLy ta/677.-. 2 6 SIN 1< r (i> 4. ..9 47. -. L.. V C. L- , ~ L_ 6 --, 1 g 1 4. 1 d MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Elli's Restoration Plan Amendment (Special Meeting) DATE: November 19, 1987 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests an amendment to the restoration component of the Elli's project, including to add on new siding, trim and cornice where the old walls are shorter than the new gypsum walled structure, replacement of several damaged boards, and screening of rooftop mechanical equipment. BACKGROUND: The Elli's Building, at 101 S. Mill Street, was designated a historic landmark by City Council on March 23, 1987, at the request of the owner. Final approval for the addition was given by HPC on March 24, 1987. The plan approved was to restore the original building and wrap an addition around the structure, adding 8,045 square Â· feet of floor area to the existing 4,024 square feet. A condition of approval was that a detailed restoration plan for the treatment of the existing Elli's Store shall be submitted to HPC for final review; restoration shall hie accomplished within 20 months after a certificate of occupancy is issued for the addition. HPC' s approval of the project constituted final City approval for the addition according to the Historic Preservation GMP exemption in Section 24-11.2(b), stating: "The enlargement of, or change in use in a structure which has received individual historic designation. " At the time of .review of the addition there was a cleart understanding between the HPC and applicant that the existing structure would be "restored". This understanding was embodied in the condition of approval, and was a requirement for eligibility of the project for the GMP exemption. Various approaches to restoring the existing structure were being considered by the applicant until a plan was presented to the HPC on June 23, 1987. A June 19, 1987 letter from Heidi Hoffmann, Proj ect Manager, explained that they had determined that the existing Â· clapboard-sided north wall and the entire parapet wa 11 above the Mill Street storefront could be braced, removed and stored on site. Those walls would be repositioned, powerwashed, and damaged boards replaced to exactly match the existing. Other detailed representations were made in this letter that HPC discussed and approved. Within the approval, the applicant was made responsible for informing the Planning Office when any replacements were necessary, so to minimize destruction of old Â¥ materials and be able to inform the public of what is occurring. We note that both HPC and staff were concerned that this restora- tion plan was unusual and sounded risky. However, the project architects successfully argued that the wood frame building was so unsound to require this radical technique and that the applicant was sure that it could be accomplished. On September 22, 1987 Heidi Houston and John Cottle spoke with HPC about rebuilding the walls entirely, informing HPC that the old walls were structurally unsound and there is evidence that they are not original. Staff explained that without use of the existing walls, there would be no restoration component in the project; therefore, eligibility for the GMP exemption for historic preservation would be nullified and the project could not be occupied without a GMP allotment. Consequently, the owner and architect did not make the request and pledged to fulfill the restoration plan. A plan to remove asbestos sheathing behind a portion of the existing walls was presented by John Cottle on October 13, 1987. On October 16 the procedures were described for this operation in detail. Subsequently, one of the owners and the project archi- tect and attorney stated that the asbestos sheathing would not be removed, and therefore the walls would go back up without the boards being removed and repositioned. However, the contractor performed the asbestos sheathing removal anyway during the following week. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The Planning Office has the following comments on the applicant's request pertaining to the walls and screening of rooftop mechanical equipment: A. Compliance with prior approvals. 1. To the best of our understanding, the dimensions of both the Main Street and Mill Street gypsum supporting walls are oversized for the original walls to fit on correctly. The Main Street supporting wall is too long - both in total distance and from the west edge of the window frame to the northeast corner of the building- and may be too tall. The height dimension is in question because the number of rows of clapboard siding appears to be the same as the original and there is another approximately 1 foot of boards propping the wall up at this time. However, David McBride of Aspen Survey Engineers reported in a November 13, 1987 letter that the historic facade along Main Street was rein- stalled at the original height on the northwest corner. The Mill Street supporting wall appears to be too long, and may also be too high. We do not fully understand how all of these dimensions turned out to be in error, nor is it necessary for staff and HPC to make that 2 determination, but it appears that a variety of factors came into play, resulting in the substructure exceeding the size of the original building. 2. The amendment before you is being proposed for the principal reason that the wall measurements are in error. In only two areas is replacement of boards requested because of serious damage. The applicant states that the cornice piece facing Main Street is rotted entirely at the eastern corner and would be replaced back approximately 4 feet. In addition, damage of the boards on the Mill Street wall at the southeast corner requires replacement. We note that some other boards have been damaged or removed as a result of being handled. 3. Approval for the restoration plan given by HPC on June 23, 1987 was for the plan presented in the applicant's letter with the understanding that the applicant has the leeway of putting up new boards where old boards are naturally damaged. The HPC discussed the difference between restoration utilizing original building parts and reconstruction using all new parts. It is clear that the HPC's approval did not encompass either recon- struction using new walls or the need for patching because of dimensional errors. B. Arguments as to why proposed changes may be inappropriate. 1. The staggered board replacement approach requires ' removal of sections of old siding and adding in new pieces. We fear that this otherwise unnecessary remedy will result in further damage to boards through handling, undermining of the walls' stability and gaps between the siding because the old boards had conformed to each other. Some gaps are evident where the asbestos sheathing was removed on the south portion of the Mill Street wall. Without repair, they will likely weather and deteriorate quickly. 2. It is our opinion that the integrity of the restoration depends on the correct repositioning of the old walls. Changes to the structure that do not relate to replace- ment of damaged boards and actually change the dimen- sions of the original walls because of errors are not appropriate. If restoration cannot be success fully accomplished, then rescinding of historic landmark designation should be considered. The owner or the City could initiate this process which would then allow the applicant to rebuild the walls with new materials and would require the applicant to address growth impacts through the appropriate GMP process. 3 3. Success of the restoration has special significance because of the prominence of the building on the busiest intersection -in Aspen, the former historic integrity and interest of the structure, and the granting of an exemption from the growth management quota system for over 8,000 square feet of new conuner- cial development. The applicant, furthermore, has taken pains to stabilize the walls with the intention of following through with a quality restoration, and it appears to be in the best interest of both the appli- 0 cant and the general public that the restoration be accomplished successfully. 4. The corner of the structure is the focal point of the building. This area most importantly should be accur- ately restored with the existing boards. C. Arguments as to why some proposed changes may be appro- priate. - 1. It can be argued that the staggered boards and new trim and cornice work will look just like the old. Once completed, the changes. proposed will have little effect on the appearance of the entire project. 2. The problems are the result of understandable errors based on good faith efforts and not an attempt to obtain more space. 3. Some of the wood is rotten and needs to be replaced separate from corrections for the dimensional errors. The plan for treatment of the Mill Street wall at the southeast corner appears to be acceptable because the new siding patch is needed due to damage, the 6 1/40' vertical trim board will not be too noticeable, and this area of the building is less significant because it was an addition and is not on the corner. D. Screening or moving of roo f-top mechanical equipment. 1. The mechanical equipment on top of the roof was not part of HPC's original approval of this project. It is typical for minor alterations to occur in a proj ect after it has received approval; however, those changes must be approved by HPC or approved through the Planning Director' s sign-of f as "insubstantial changes to an approved plan." In this case, the applicant installed the equipment without such approval. Further- more, the surveyor noted that two ventilators encroach into the Main Street view plane by 4 inches. 4 We believe that the applicant should further study the placement and screening concepts to reduce visual impacts of the large amount of mechanical equipment on the roof. The presence of the shiny equipment seems excessive and detracts from the old structure. As of the time of writing, complete plans have not been submitting identifying the equipment and screening; therefore, we recommend tabling of action on this subject. 2. Staff will try to have photographs available at your meeting showing the roof-top mechanical equipment from public ways in the vicinity in case you choose to deal with the issue at this time. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative actions that HPC can take include: A. Deny the requested amendment to Elli' s restoration plan in total, requiring the applicant to bring the structure into compliance with the approved plan (i.e., reducing the length and height of the supporting structure and reducing the Main Street opening so that the corner will fit together). B. Deny the requested amendment in total and initiate rescind- ing of historic landmark designation allowing the walls to be rebuilt with new material and requiring the applicant to address growth impacts through the appropriate GMP process. C. Deny the requested amendment to Elli's restoration plan as it pertains to the Main Street wall to fit properly in place (i.e., reducing the length of the supporting structure and reducing the Main Street opening so that the corner will fit together) and approving the proposed treatment of the Mill Street wall at the southeast corner. D. Approve the requested amendment to Elli's restoration plan to accomplish patching of the original walls where the supporting structure is too big and where indicated that replacement is necessary due to damage of original mater- ials. E. Table action on the requested amendment in order to give the applicant, HPC and the public additional time to consider appropriate ways to mitigate the problem of the walls not fitting back together. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: The Planning Office recommends Alternative C as the appropriate way to mitigate the wall problems while tabling action on the proposed screening of mechanical equipment, in the following motions: "Move to deny the requested amendment to Elli's restora- 5 tion plan as it pertains to the Main Street wall to fit properly in place (i.e., requiring reduction in the length of the supporting structure and reduction in the Main Street opening so that the corner fits back together)." "Move to approve the following requested changes to the Elli's restoration plan: 4(1) replacement of the cornice piece facing Main Street that is rotten, starting the new piece approximately 4 feet back, and (2) treatment of the Mill Street wall at the southeast corner as fropÂ°ged to install new siding where damaged or missing, inove -th&- 42 03.1/ existing cornice to the south corner and add a new piece approximately one foot long, and install a 6 1/4" vertical 10 4'Q trim board along the south edge of the historic storefront." 11-b,4 61*Â£ "Move to table action on the proposed screening of roof-top mechanical equipment until the applicant has prepared a complete application showing analysis of the location and height of the equipment, specifically identifying the equipment and the screening." sb.ell.19 â€¢ 6 40)2.f 41 ' W,u#'* 1 U-4 . _ ~ /4 4 '4 31 , 116 AteL ,; s vt.4,71,4 611141,1~ pi) 0 (BL' 6 M,â€¢ h r e /1 0,â€ž4 7, 0 (,17, P.-VO,l 84~44 ~2~K'j~ *2i,r# 9 p A S 54 4 mon +D fli ,-A,A--*,v Â·ropti~ 'Flfi 1 'NAD"; 4 wn, 10*11#- dfl, firtlivA) 4 (1,<Gli V 1441,11 0 4 3 6 i I 2==3=l//I 13 November 1987 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS iTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 Members of the HPC 303/925-2867 City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear HPC Members: This letter will serve as the formal application letter for the upcoming HPC meeting; an update on our progress on the restoration of the existing walls, and answer questions regarding the height of the project and the visual impact of the roof top mechanical equipment. As you are aware, there is a gap in the north (Main Street) wall where the repositioned existing walls do not fit together. This gap varies from 8 1/2" to 12 1/4", depending upon where the measurement is taken. (8 1/2" occurs at the side of the window facing Main Street and 12 1/4" occurs at the northeast corner at the top). After extensive review of the original survey, photographs of the building before construction began, a recently completed survey, and our own construction documents, we can account for the following discrepancies. When calculating the foundation dimensions back from the original wood siding dimensions, an error was made which set the size of the foundation 4 3/8" larger than was appropriate. In addition, 2 1/2" of the gap is attributable to a piece of trim of the northwest corner of the original building which was not continuous to the roof line (stopping approximately 2'-6" from the parapet) resulting in the bottom of the building being 2 1/2" larger than the top. Because survey dimensions were conducted on the ground plane, and because the larger dimension represented the most accurate mass of the building, the new construction was built to those dimensions (see photo #1) . Finally, 1 1/4" of the gap is attributable to the extra layer of gypboard sheathing which was required by the Building Department after a building permit had been issued, concrete had been poured, and steel erected. These factors taken together come to a total of 8 1/8". The fact that the gap at the northeast corner of the building is substantially greater than that is, I believe, due to the fact that the original building was neither vertically plumb, nor square, nor straight, and the northeast corner of the original building had settled considerably due to the lack of foundation walls. Letter to Members of the HPC 13 November 1987 Page Two It is important to note that, even though the existing walls do not fit together as planned, the building as constructed is in compliance with all open space and FAR calculations submitted to the Planning Office for the project's approvals: In other words, the building has not increased in size. We are proposing to take several steps to complete the restoration of the existing walls. Main Street The existing wall will be placed to the western edge of the structural wall, which will allow trimming of the wall and window, and join to the new west facing wall without modification. The cornice piece facing Main Street is rotted entirely at the eastern corner and will be replaced back approximately 4'-0", where it will be cut into the existing cornice at a 45Â° angle. The window header above the Main Street window will be dealt with in two ways: The flat vertical trim will be added on the eastern edge, and the. cornice projection will be removed, moved to the east, and a duplicate cornice added to the west to be flush with the finished window trim (see drawing #2) . This will produce corners which match nicely and avoid vertical joints of "old meeting new". The gap in the siding at the corner of Mill and Main can then be filled in with a combination of new and reused existing siding (see drawing #3) ; a solution which would replace an area of siding of only approximately 1'-9" x 5'-6" on the entire north (Main Street) wall. Mill Street The cornice piece (presently positioned incorrectly) will be moved to its correct position by sliding it to the southern corner of the structural walls and a new piece of cornice and fascia board will then be added at the northern edge of that panel(see drawing #4). New siding as required will be patched in at the southern face of the parapet where boards were unable to be saved as the wall was removed from the concrete block to which the siding was attached. As a general note, all siding, whether new or existing, which is to be patched into an existing wall shall have the joints staggered so that there is no discernable line of old to new. All trim or other wood which must be removed to patch in Letter to Members of the HPC 13 November 1987 Page Three new siding (or must be removed for any other reason) shall be removed carefully to avoid any damage to the board and reused using the existing nail holes in every possible case. We are pleased with the fact that the asbestos boards were removed without damage to the wall in which it was placed; all patch and repair work described in this letter shall meet or exceed the quality of that work. It is imperative that boards which are undamaged remain so and boards which are damaged be repaired. In addition to the conclusion of the restoration plan, the Planning Office has asked us to address the height of the building and the visual impact of the mechanical equipment. We have resurveyed the building to address the issue of height. At this time Survey Engineers (who performed the original survey of the project) is completing their calculations and a letter of their findings will be presented to the Planning Office when it is completed. We are proposing to screen the three major pieces of mechanical equipment with a wooden fence that will match the new siding. This will visually screen the mechanical equipment from their predominant viewpoint along Main Street (see drawing #5). As was anticipated and mentioned in our final approval meeting of June 23, 1987, the restoration process has proved to be an extremely difficult one, and the "leeway of putting up new boards" will be a great benefit in completing this project in a manner in which we will all be proud. Thank you for your help with these proposals. Very truly yours, 1/,f /' 1 John Cottle AIA l Partner Heidi Hoffmann AIA Project Manager JC:HH:sv enclosures CC: Heidi Houston Gideon Kaufman Dave Reams Steve Meyer Phil Holstein 414 /74/ 7,. 1 WEST WALL Ave ITI OA) r // -1 - C=7?17 i NOT COAFri k) UO US TO - COF.0 log (,21/,21). 1 - r. 1 ,4 6. 1 r 'r '24 1 ... r â€¢i - MA /R STEET AT Al W COA NE.8., - . 1. 1 - . .. 44. - 6.9.. . :~ r- / h...: 1 1 ' a '.... . . . .. / ' ~4.... ~.It-,5:Â· ... ~--4414 . ./f 2.'42:j~92'-rt:.ru;25*te-- .kwy --Â« --Irt- .trad : .. 4% . . .... *492..42- - -- 6.4 1 3*35/9*#6~4.i -- .- P:.-4.44: 4, . I.-tr77'Z- ~ - .., .:. ~ ~ .t .2:-~ . - L . '7053..7 -12.-2 v.-1 .. I ./ I - i . I. . 1~T.. 2 I./1~79917 37:.9.0. ....... 0...4 . . -71,34Â¥11 1-f- rM, -+411 1 , ' Â· 4..,4. . -/ 4 1,./- I * i ;2:51: foilil:Imm; ,~ Â»Â· - .v u Â· 11 ./ 1 . 0/. !1 11'461; 1.21//Zi I :. â€¢ ......-- 4 . .4-, . 4 NO Â·~ ~ Â¥ 1,21591% 1., 4 -- L_.. ...I- C G . E -rze:. -.- - ----- . f>,4 0 4-21 - . A ,n - -/ (* A.0.- 5/0/~4 83 r r /73h , pA/27- A 1 1 - 5.1 /Zoau,ce m.ail_... i -- -- I j LE-La Â· *Stâ€¢KCED -14 -- - ---- , 4-5/ -1 - 1 . 1 -/ 1 1/.9 27 -- 1 1 - 1 . IL 1JC D.f#n-â€ž c' ir 4 1/'. I / 4 Â¢ i r K-- - - #bar- 0- K=KE=F-zR J 11 Â£11,5 /4 -3 . 9 -in 1 . NE-21Pdo=-5-I- -- 1 . : | APEK- PE 9[>f Ne,10 eFS Be,WDYâ‚¬D - ---2Â£ 9Â·mefr,AceDÂ· .5/1796 Men,>F,FC> ~ 0 VEBTTCAL MAr) keÂ»62%& - /f /0 aff /156â‚¬ZED AA* 723 Â»VE,F Â»U - MA 7/ mE V i 5\ ' 1 A AMVE S /SELOW 1..." " "I ./1 L~- -((.967D~M''4, 7 ..1 . FL 773=/cr 3 0 . i N Â¥ 4.640*.R 780 BE-Anoc// 8.9 Â·87 , /01. 9 ii 1 , 4 : i L _ .--I-.I- I .--li - ax/ST/bled aLL/'6 - I v -/ D ETRAC,--ABLE 1 I./4 1(.8,0, -/6/1 -0- |~ '| - 3~ , J.- - - 1 ' A - 17=m \1 /2% - --PA/A/T 2 1 -- \ -2 <4? 204 . 1 / 6 Er & r-A 1 4-3/ li j ' . - -747 h 1 L 1>IC 6 - 1 LIJ 1 1 _i '-1 . -2 it /<ih 1 :' -<-----FALME 5 ...... 5511 - 1 . 0 . 1 1 11-04 |~11 ' '1, #11 /74..: illit'1111111 . 1 ' 11,1.1 71 1 11 1 , r. 0. 00*16- .t- - # 1 Â· 13 L 95Â· 6. r A 43-91% 024 4 tr< 0 866('6 NOMIM OJALL meuoupme>,u rEAg 4.1,0~ 4, t- BoTED w/ C,~ # 9,87 ./. 1 4 ... 1 11 506:. ..#443 73 EL --8----Â· . ..-t I , 4 MOVE Co'41 ICE To 6012446[2.-, BEBUILD 50017 6* 5 697UX'/ 7-0 *ALL --- NEW 4,1/41 -refti ~~*610 510/AB - 1-791~ FATEMED I I'J //4.1/111-- 1262'Ull.CD HEADEFL I ./ - 0% pe'2- ARC-HITECI-DfUL PRAW / A]GS -1121-l94 FF-m Â· f I , ...' -il . 1 J I. -2 4 - ~EnCLE ~ ~CAGE[ MJLL 01-ReeT._9 LL t_--2-1--22*fz_ ~ 1////7/ /777777 9 9%94 Move coRM l CE 7-0 COF416(2-iMEBU{LID nfl 500-n-\ 6/00 91 BETU"1 72, tV/iLL 7=737*4-'086 ~& sE~~J 1 / /. 1/-77--,k-'.*. A ReÂ®ULLED HEADEF- . Pefz- ARC-HIT-EalÂ¥UL .. 1- - /=-- ... A pe.AUJUJUS -TIZ-4 161 . - IEE - EAÂ£61 1 W ..4 - , *.' - I - 1 8111 5TSÂ«I_3jALL @_SE-Ef~6/6/2.. 1 1 - //>~i,FAOVICE kboo '56,6661 FEBCE AROUND EVAPORAT) Vâ‚¬ / CODLEA>- MATCH AN. SID/NG i CIO .t:13 f k A-33{-f-$ 1 9%22- ~ ~li==31 1 1 LrÂ·--, ,Et --~--L4--kto-o--__~1_1 - 1 CL . Amspe CEIVE PHOTO op HVAC Ed>uffÂ°rl/\EN.}T 91:5 - I NOV 16 !987 b 1 :11 ' HAGMAN YAW 16 November 1987 ARCHITECTS ____ ___ 1.ID 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Mr. Steve Burstein Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Elli's of Aspen Dear Steve: As mentioned in my HPC application letter dated 13 November 1987, attached please find height and view plane verification from Survey Engineers stating that the replaced Elli's wall are reconstructed to their original height and that the original building and the addition do not interfere with the view plane. As Mr. McBride's letter also notes, two exhaust fan units protrude into the view plane by 4". Please note that these are not the three evaporative cooling units located to the north of grid line 6 (the major step in the building) which has been the focus of attention to date. If the Planning Office and HPC deems it necessary, we will move or shorten the fan units so that they do not interfere with the view plane. I trust you will forward this lettter and attachments to the HPC members. Thank you. Sincerely, Hagman Yaw Architects, Ltd ..47 14-/ / A k? /t f y ( u.. l , ;John Cottle AIA \Partner JC:aa cc w/ enclosures: Heidi Houston Phil Holstein Steve Meyer Dave Remin Paul Taddune Gideon Kaufman ./ :f.*;574.â€¢â€¢ ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 S. Galena St. P.O. Box 2506 Aspen. Colorado 81611 NOVEMBER 13. 1987 1303] 925-3816 JOB NO. 16360 JOHN COTTLE HAGMAN YAW. LTD. 210 S. GALENA ST. ASPEN. COLO. 81611 REFERENCE: ELLI'S OF ASPEN DEAR JOHN: AT YOUR REQUEST. OUR FIRM VERIFIED THE HE I GHTS OF 1 HE NEW CONSTRUCTION AT ELLI'S (LOTS G.H. & I BLOCK BO. CITY OF ASPEN) AND FOUND THE FOLLOWING: 1.> THE HISTORIC FACADE ALONG MAIN Sl-REET WAS REINSTALLED AT THE ORIGINAL HEIGHT ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER AND IS AT OR BELOW THE "MAIN Sl-REET VIEW PLANE" FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS HISTORICAL. FACADE IS OUT--OF-SQUARE. TWO OF THE NEW EXHAUST POWER VIâ‚¬14 1-It.ATORS WERE 1-013140 -1-[.3 ENCROACH INTO THE "MAIN STREET VIEW PLANE" BY 0.3 FEE1 (4 INCHES TOO HIGH). THIS VIEW PLANE IS DETERMINED TO BE COINCIDENT WIT-H THE ORIGINAL HEIGHT OF ELLI 'S HISTORIC FACADE. 3.) THE REST OF THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE WAS FOUND NOT TO ENCROACH INTO THE MAIN STREET VIEW PLANE AS DETERMINED FROM 1Â·17 FIE.I.D SURVEYS OF JAN. 6. 1987 AND NOVEMBER 13. 1987. WE TRUST THAT THIS WILL. MEET WITH YOi.JR APPROVAL AND THAT WE MAY BE OF FURTHER SERVICE TO YOU. SINCERELY YOURS. ''' ~ DAVID Mc BR IDE PRESIDENT f 1 RI.-S 16129 64Â«,c Â·. TOL Â£ v MEMORANDUM C..OA- TO: Bob Anderson 8-Lb-05 ~--O--0/'b--4. . FROM: Alan Richman ~~ . 1 RE: Elli's Issues DATE: November 20, 1987 == You have asked that I provide you some further insight into the issues associated with the restoration of Elli's. Following is the information you requested. 1. Did the HPC have the final authority on this development? According to Ordinance 11, Series of 1987, Council has delegated final authority on all development and demolition within an H, Historic Overlay District, or to a Historic Landmark to HPc. Council authority on matters of historic preservation is limited to: a. designating districts and structures as historic, b. reviewing appeals of HPC decisions, and c. adopting the historic guidelines. The appeals section of the Ordinance places no limitation on who has standing to appeal a decision made by HPC. 2. Why was the Hotel Jerome subj ect to review for a similar activity? The Hotel Jerome was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commiss- ion and City Council under the following authority: a. The rear half of the block had been zoned Office, in which a hotel is prohibited. The rear half of the block was rezoned to CC, which required P&Z and Council action. b. A hotel is a conditional use in the CC zone, requiring P&Z approval. C. The applicant requested and received PUD des ig- nation, in order to vary height and FAR limitations. This was received, in return for which the project was asked to mitigate parking and employee housing impacts. The GMP exemption which applied to each of these proj ects provided for no review by P&Z or Council and so the impact mitigation obtained from the Jerome was due only to these other regulatory provisions, none of which applied to Elli's. 3. Approximately how much money did the applicant save in employee housing fees? The addition to the structure was approximately 8,000 square feet of commercial space in the CC zone. The employee generation factor for this building, which includes restaurant space is 5.25 employees/ 1,000 sq. ft. Therefore, the project generated about 42 employees. Had the applicant competed in the GMQS , the minimum number of employees housed to meet the threshold is 3 5%. Therefore, the applicant would have needed to provide housing for at least 14.7 employees. If the applicant had housed these employees via cash-in-lieu, the cost would have been as follows: a. if low income = $294,000 b. if moderate income = $195,510 c. if middle income = $132,300 Since the decision as to which guideline the unit is restricted is made during project review, it is hard to predict which would have applied, but some combination of moderate and low income housing would have been the likely result. 4. What remedy do we propose to avoid this problem in the future? As part of the rewrite of the Code, the following language for GMP exemptions for historic projects will be considered by P&Z and Council: "The enlargement of, or change of use of, an Historic Landmark which increases its net leasable commercial or office space by less than fifty ( 50%) percent, or which increases its existing number of residential dwelling units or hotel, lodge, bed and breakfast, boardinghouse, roominghouse or dormitory units by less than ten (10) units." This revision received conceptual approval by Council during one of our work sessions and will be presented to P&Z in December. 5. What other pertinent information can I provide? One important factor for everyone to remember is that this project was reviewed last winter and spring, and came on the heels of two very controversial actions in historic preservation, these being the demolition moratorium and the scoring of struc- tures on the historic inventory. HPC was interested in trying to work positively with applicants, to show them that their guide- lines could be applied flexibly to make projects work. While some may say that the technique which was used here was too '....2.4~~4~â€¢.~ '.Â·,~,; experimental for such an important corner, if they think back to the community atmosphere of that time, maybe they will understand why HPC chose to go ahead with the project. I think it is also important that you know that we have learned some lessons from this project. The same applicant approached us with a proposal to build an equally large addition to the two miner's cottages between the Miner's Building and the ARA build- ing. We took a strong stance in opposition to another such expansion and warned that amendments to the Code are in the process of being formulated which would require GMP competition for such projects. Not only has the project not been pursued, but the property has since been sold to Carl Bergman. I hpoe this provides the responses you need. Please let me know what else I can provide to you. CC: Steve Burstein ellis 911 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office A-4 RE: Report on the Elli's Addition and Restoration DATE: November 4, 1987 (Updated November 18, 1987) Alan Richman asked me to respond to your request for information on the Elli's addition and reconstruction/restoration project. Following is a brief account of the approvals and subsequent problems with the project. 1. Historic Designation of Structure Owners of the Elli's Building, at 101 S. Mill Street, requested historic landmark designation along with seven other structures in February, 1987. Designation was accomplished by adoption of Ordinance 5 (Series of 1987). The building had received a historic rating from the HPC of "5", the highest score in their rating system used in January, 1987 to rate all undesignated historic buildings in Aspen. It was clearly a structure highly eligible for designation. 2. HPC approval of the addition Expansion plans were first conceptually presented to HPC on January 13, 1987. Meetings were held by HPC from February through June, 1987 to finalize approvals. Conceptual approval was given by HPC on February 16, 1987. Final approval (public hearing) for the addition was granted by HPC on March 24, 1987. The plan approved by HPC was to restore the original building and wrap an addition around the structure, adding 8,045 square feet of floor area to the existing 4,024 square feet (FAR of 1.3:1). A lot of discussion took place about the massing of the addition in relation to the old building, setting it back from the Main Street elevation, keeping the height of the Main Street facade within 2 feet of the existing building's height. HPC was general- ly satisfied with the applicant's concepts; and various refine- ments took place as a result of HPC's comments. Staff generally supported the project based on the representations which were made. A condition of approval was that a detailed restoration plan for the treatment of the existing Elli's Store shall be submitted to HPC for final review; restoration shall be accom- plished within 20 months after C.O. is issued for the addition. 3. GMP exemption for enlargement of a designated historic structure HPC's approval of the project constituted final City approval for the addition according to the Historic Preservation GMP exemption in Section 24-11.2(b), stating: "The enlargement of, or change in use in a structure which has received individual historic designation." At the time of review of the addition there was a clear understanding between the HPC and applicant that the existing structure would be "restored". This understanding was embodied in the condition of approval, and presented no problem for the eligibility of the project for the GMP exemption. No review processes were waived. If this project had been reviewed under the growth management quota system for new commercial development, employee housing, energy conservation representations, and additional scrutiny of visual impacts and site plans would have been required at a minimum. In the GMP process, HPC would still have been involved in its review of the project, while P&Z would score it and Council would allocate the quota for new commercial space. The project was not subject to viewplane special review because it was determined that the structure would not project into the Main Street Viewplane. Please note that the historic preservation GMP exemption was discussed in the Historic Preservation Plan Element (page IV.11). The Planning Office stated that in our opinion this exemption is too broad and projects should be reviewed by either P&Z and/or Council besides HPC. However, the consensus of the P&Z was that change to the GMP exemption is not appropriate and therefore no action was recommended in the Plan. Changing the terms of this exemption has, however, been conceptually accepted by Council as part of the Code rewrite, and is being forwarded to P&Z for their consideration. 4. HPC's approval of restoration Various approaches to restoring the existing structure were being considered by the applicant until a plan was presented to the Committee on June 23, 1987. A June 19 letter from Heidi Hoffmann, project manager, explained that they had determined that the existing clapboard-sided north wall and the entire parapet wall above the storefronts could be braced, removed and stored on site. Those walls would be repositioned, powerwashed, and damaged boards replaced to exactly match the existing. Other detailed representations were made in this letter that HPC discussed and approved. Within the approval, the applicant was made responsible for informing the Planning Office when any replacements were necessary, so to minimize destruction of old materials and be able to inform the public of what is occurring. Both HPC and staff were concerned that this restoration plan was unusual and sounded risky. However, the project architect successfully argued that the wooden frame building was so unsound to require this radical technique and that the applicant was sure that it could be accomplished. 2 "Restoration" is defined in the proposed new Historic District and Historic Landmark Guidelines as " The act or process Of accurately recovering the form and details of a property and its setting as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of later work or by the replacement of missing earlier work." Staff and HPC made the call that the removal, restabilization, and repositioning of walls, with minor replace- ment of damaged materials exactly matching the original, was an acceptable approach of restoration. The focus of discussion was treatment of the building's exterior so that minimal replacement of original materials occurred and walls would be stabilized to ensure survivability. Upon reflection, staff now believes that this technique might not be considered appropriate again because it has caused so many difficulties and the sense of the community is that the internal structure of a historic building is also important. The Glidden House was similarly dismantled in 1984, however, it was "reconstructed" with new materials. Many in the community were upset with that technique too, while others feel that the end result is acceptable. 5. Tree removal and landscape plan Removal of the three large spruce trees on Main Street and a new landscaping plan were approved by the Parks Department, subject to Section 13-76(D)(5) of the Municipal Code, on February 16, 1987. CCLC had a number of meetings on the Elli's sidewalk and plaza area design from February to June, 1987. The Engineering Department gave staff assistance. 6. Subsequent events On September 22, 1987 Heidi Houston and John Cottle came to talk with HPC about rebuilding the walls entirely, informing HPC that the old walls were structurally unsound and there is evidence that they are not original. Staff explained that without use of the existing walls, there would be no restoration component in the project; therefore, eligibility for the GMP exemption for historic preservation would be nullified and the project could not be occupied without a GMP allotment. As a result, the applicant did not make the request and pledged to fulfill the "restoration" plan. On October 13, John Cottle presented a plan to remove asbestos sheathing behind a portion of the existing walls. On October 16 the procedures were described for this operation in a letter from John Cottle. Subsequently, in a meeting with Paul Taddune and the project owner, architect, and attorney it was stated that the asbestos sheathing would not be removed, and therefore the walls would go back up without the boards being removed and reposition- ed. However, the contractor performed the asbestos sheathing removal anyway during the following week. 3 The most recent problem is that we now find that the exist ing walls do not fit back together given the new structure which ha s been built. Heidi Houston discovered this on Tuesday, November 3 and contacted the Planning Of f ice for an immediate site vis it. Due to problems in making old, weathered, and out-of-square wall s go onto new square infrastructure, and possibly mismeasurement, the north wall is approximately one foot shorter than support ing structure and the corners of the east and north walls do not corne flush. A stop work order was issued on November 10, 1987 for work on the restoration component o f the proj ect until it is brought into compliance or HPC grants an amended approval. The Historic Preservation Committee is holding a special meeting on November 19 at 4: 00 P.M. in order to consider an amendment to the approved HPC plans to add on new siding, trim and cornice where the old walls are short than the new gypsum walled structure. Another problem brought to our attention is the location Of mechanical equipment on the rooftop of the structure. It is visible from the Hotel Jerome sidewalk. HPC plans do not Show this protrusion; although building permit plans do show the equipment. If this equipment protrudes into the Main Street View Plane, it should be removed; if not we will insure that it be screened in a method to be approved by HPC. sb.ereport 4 PUBLIC HEARING RE: RE-POSITIONING OF ELLI' S WALLS ~ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on ~ Tuesday, November 24, 1987, at a meeting to begin at 2:30 P.M., before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the City Council Chambers, 1st Floor, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO to consider an application to amend the restoration component of the Elli's project at 101 S. Mill Street, including adding on to the siding, trim, and cornices where the old walls are shorter than the new gypsum walled structure, replacement of damaged boards, and screening of rooftop mechanical equipment. For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925- 2020, ext. 223. s/Bill Poss Chairperson, Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on November 12, 1987. City of Aspen Account MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Compliance of Elli's Restoration Plan with HPC Approval DATE: November 10, 1987 It has come to my attention that the restoration component of the Elli's project is not in compliance with HPC's approval. The approved plans called for the existing Mill Street and Main Street walls to be repositioned as to their original positions. Those walls do not fit back together given the understructure built. Length of supporting walls and possibly height exceed the original walls' dimensions. In your position as Director of Planning and Development you are given the authority to direct the Building Inspector to issue a stop work order for construction proceeding contrary to approvals granted through the Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. In my opinion the cited noncompliance is a very significant problem. I recommend that you direct the Building Inspector to issue a stop work order on the restoration component of the project until either (1) a plan is presented showing how the walls can be placed in compliance with HPC's approval to the satisfaction of the Planning Office, or (2) an amendment to the approved restora- tion plan is approved at a public hearing of HPC. No tenant finish or occupancy of any part of the building should be allowed until this matter is addressed. I consulted the City Attorney today and he agreed with this approach. We expect that tomorrow we will discuss in detail with the owner or representatives what must be done to either receive Planning Office approval or to submit a complete application for HPC's review for an amendment. If you approve of the stop work action, please sign the signature block below. I hereby approve directing the Building Inspector to issue a stop work order for the restoration component of the Elli's project and tenant finish as described in this memorandum. >*'t Â« LI Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Compliance of Elli's Restoration Plan with HPC Approval DATE: November 10, 1987 It has come to my attention that the restoration component of the Elli's project is not in compliance with HPC's approval. The approved plans called for the existing Mill Street and Main Street walls to be repositioned as to their original positions. Those walls do not fit back together given the understructure built. Length of supporting walls and possibly height exceed the original walls' dimensions. In your position as Director of Planning and Development you are given the authority to direct the Building Inspector to issue a stop work order for construction proceeding contrary to approvals granted through the Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. In my opinion the cited noncompliance is a very significant problem. I recommend that you direct the Building Inspector to issue a stop work order on the restoration component of the project until either (1) a plan is presented showing how the walls can be placed in compliance with HPC's approval to the satisfaction of the Planning Office, or (2) an amendment to the approved restora- tion plan is approved at a public hearing of HPC. No tenant finish or occupancy of any part of the building should be allowed until this matter is addressed. I consulted the City Attorney today and he agreed with this approach. We expect that tomorrow we will discuss in detail with the owner or representatives what must be done to either receive Planning Office approval or to submit a complete application for HPC's review for an amendment. If you approve of the stop work action, please sign the signature block below. I hereby approve directing the Building Inspector to issue a stop work order for the restoration component of the Elli's project and tenant finish as described in this memorandum. >lk Â« Le Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director ---- It f NOV O 4 9. HAGMAN YAW 9 November 1987 litÂ· t U tool ARCHITECTS / U l.: L LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Mr. Steve Burstein Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Steve: This letter is to update our Elli's Restoration Plan letter of June 19, 1987 and will serve as a follow-up to last week's on-site observation of the repositioned walls. Due to a variety of factors, the repositioned walls do not fit back together. The following description should set forth the problems encountered in that repositioning. The design of the new construction that receives the repositioned Elli walls was based upon a survey with existing dimensions and certain assumptions at those areas that were difficult to determine dimensionally (i.e. the corner where the north and east walls meet above the clipped storefront entrance below) . The existing Elli's building as it sat on the site was not square to the property lines nor plumb to the vertical. The clipped corner was not at a true 45Â° and how far off it was, was extremely difficult to determine. It is important to note that the entirety of the existing east and north walls were carefully measured prior to the removal of the walls, and the measurements included not only overall dimensions, but windows, doors and individual trim pieces. Even though overall dimensions were performed by a licensed surveyor and carefully coordinated with our office's field measurements, the condition of the existing building, and the fact that they were neither straight, nor vertical, nor consistent in any variation from current building practices, was extremely difficult to determine and adequately account for in the planning of new structural walls. Additionally, at the northwest corner the survey dimensions were to the outside corner at the base. This corner (as can be viewed from the enclosed photocopies) is not continuous for the full height of the building and that adjustment was not taken into account when grids and dimensions were laid out. All of the above have contributed to the existing situation in which, although the Mill Street parapet fits the new construe- tion very well, the north (Main Street) wall has a gap of between approximately 8 1/2" and 1'-0" where it meets the new and old construction as planned. mil,mL__~ EZZ.ZEL=-7.I Letter to Mr. Steve Burstein 9 November 1987 Page Two We are proposing to take several steps to complete the restoration of the existing walls. Main Street The existing wall will be placed to the western edge of the structural wall, which will allow trimming of the wall and window, and join to the new west facing wall without modification. The cornice piece facing Main Street is rotted entirely at the eastern corner and will be replaced back approxiamtely 4'-0", where it will be cut into the existing cornice at a 45Â° angle. The window header above the Main Street window will be dealt with in two ways. The flat vertical trim will be added to on the eastern edge, and the cornice projection will be removed, moved to the east, and a duplicate cornice added to the west to flush with the finish window trim. (See drawing.) This will produce corners which match nicely and avoid vertical joints of "old meeting new". The gap in the siding at the corner of Mill and Main can then be filled in with a combination of new and reused existing siding (see drawing attached) ; a solution which would replace an area of siding of only 11-9" x 5'-6" on the entire north (Main Street) wall. Mill Street The cornice piece (presently positioned incorrectly) will be moved to its correct position by sliding it to the southern corner of the structural walls and a new piece of cornice and fascia board will then be added at the northern edge of that panel (see drawings). New siding as required will be patched in at the southern face of the parapet where boards were unable to be saved as the wall was removed from the concrete block to which the siding was attached. As a general note, all siding, whether new or existing, which is to be patched into an existing wall shall have the joints staggered so that there is no discernable line of old to new. All trim or other wood which must be removed to patch in new siding (or must be removed for any other reason) shall be removed carefully to avoid any damage to the board and reused using the existing nail holes in every possible case. We are pleased with the fact that the asbestos boards were removed without damage to the wall in which it was placed; all Letter to Mr. Steve Burstein 9 November 1987 Page Three patch and repair work described in this letter shall meet or exceed the quality of that work. It is imperative that boards which are undamaged remain so and boards which are damaged be repa i red. As was mentioned in our final approval meeting of June 23, 1987, the restoration process has proved to be an extremely difficult one, and the "leeway of putting up new boards" will be a great benefit in completing this project in a manner in which we will all be proud. Thank you for your help with these proposals. Very truly yours, .|MAn Cottle AIA Partner 11- f 446~ cli Heidi Hoffmann AIA Project Manager JC:HH:sv enclosures CC: Heidi Houston Gideon Kaufman Dave Reams Steve Meyer Rk'F DyÂ° EOU/Â»012/4 7 - ' ~~~~~ - 1 < - ---4 Â£ , -71 fE ~ l./ --il -5 - - 2_ 7 1 f / Alave,W/CE 3 --2 - ( ca*3$WD 71#29776BED// i C <73,M 70 -3 /1 Be APPeD ) _____ f < 11~'07 Â¥ 9.87 A 9 . - -- - YA! i. /0 6 U. --. -- - - 1 lili -Â¥ 1}66( SID/Nein Ji : 411//1 ( 138 Fi'VCAâ‚¬ C) >f j ~ , ---------ri,E\*2 -4..c. 3.142 43.-E - LA \Uu/,4 132-- .... : \\41/ /~- -- - - - - 7-// /0 ,\12% U-Â¥07 -- - LL.3 ' 13:AluT- L 1 11/ ALA.5 1 - 34*79-1. 4>12-- --_- 1 2- - 9~2, 7-------7 7 9------7-F 1 4 4 1 0 1 - -It- - 1 11 d I Ul-- - ---- 1 1 - r/-X Ly - . riD j l 68.L *traT + ' 1 4-1/ F u A- El-EVP<710 rt (/61 ) <.3 . 1 - -%< %- -- 1 42 (43/ - 01 21 F 11 Â£ 11_loa " 4 OB-Ve 7 22-91 11 k m 4 â‚¬57 - M - em/* . eâ‚¬r- WAL<- FEADOA710AJ PGAA, 1 3 AjoteD tu <2~I) 1/.9 87 - 1 1 1 .-/ -I#-Il.- ---1-- il*--i.- .----ill--. En~77--iULE- 2722-2-7~-7~---M -2- JUNE~ -I~ILE 77--2- __---2-fi---2--2--+~__ 1 M.. r -1 - C & A -- Sjolija EA - 32232- A ..1 /0731 /1-*Erik cofkh)/Ce 70 1 /,FN 89%405/ -------- - -.- f I i r/9.4.- es= - .-I .:.' - 1,0 -7.42 - - - ---31=473=:El Â£112. 4 \2-2 1- 41 - 1 0 _ _ _--_ _---1 ' - 4= 90 F 1 11 - -*m_aGELL~-;22_ - Â¢88770,6 n.Ar '-- m,4 -lb PE - # 1 --3 059**7*,ET__Â¥_~m54QkM__. APPED /690 .'2 -- 111 / - . i L.___13 cr.0 1 -1'v 122-*2 A.ED - - /Â£27.9 1 --1 11 V 7 I - 1 44-1*- 9- -4 4 11 1 1 --1 6 4 -4 RETRAC-ABLE .\ ---- --1-t_L~-Â·1+1 ' 1____.-d.1-1-__, t--~- FER L_j \\ 111 11 (1â‚¬-4~ - --- LE*JAÂ£7/.2- --- I -- 2 Kal --OR ALL) SeE - 14 .-I ! i '- I. ~Ii 1 ---Â«1/34:42- 3+_f___---'; ~ ~ YAA -1 :f ,42Â·Â· | '1 1 - 11 41-0.f â‚¬ , 4 ------------- c 1 j .u h 3777-TETEFU Â£ 9 60#45 -- L 96. 6 A 13 -9 311 /,2 4 0-3.-- C 1 L_L--1 i ELL[ 6 * NOFErH WALL FESJOUF~10,0 PLAN t i. . *. / 51 A-------------1----------------------------------- f . - N BOTED Â« 412) # 9.87 L r - -- I. I ~ -2-.4-0.R.> A-- : r kilill.'law"Pes,4..9 -~ 9, 7 9 72 .,6 -1 . I 1-'*-4 ,......~.. ' . ..4=71.Wr=-30 4 1 J / Im 7.1 1,1X '11 -'I"I....--Il--Ill-- 1.....I.. I ; E . 4 -- 1-- i . 1-1 + 2 g J. I , - Â· .. 3.-2-latt:"u. â€¢4 :-4-51QkÂ¢*Y~Â· I. /1 I .... . .. ' 11 /*- / ./. Â·Â· 42% -h . 1=140Â£. ../ - . 4. i- I."â€¢cy-.2/51&*1PM- -4 433Ex1ct 4. - - 2-i ..ka:.'.*irÂ·k 46 - - â€¢ii:45 /,4.99 - t ..y_. 4â€¢ / 1*t . - 4' .It $6 4 1 1. 1/ . tal Z/;35'34 15LF*Y'14Â£~P tf~ *3.--Yi.~~"*A-h.*9 5:,TÂ·-pri-"p-4:.U-9.;-i,FA<Mtrp#4%6~-~....:*8~~.0#.fi wf~~C.'~M f..44,<*Swerrw:5/1/T:=.22/"1/.Ie' â€¢ -- .Y : 4 - - - . I 05.; - - -Gl,r -K;. I. , *F../6.~.,0..4#.. - tz... MC"'///e' 4 9.75/1Â£** /2Â¥n.~f--2â„¢*.3 1. 1484*3.7 -*r( * 75 in . ..... . 74 4=... . r. F . b - . ... t J. I. . I I. 4.. . â‚¬mÂ». 1 . ./ , 21 - .- - I . . 'Â¥4 I. 4/449/,d i t~'#R),FIMS,/EM.4 ' .. 'M,Yewl, 1-* n .6 . '4 3 . 16% 't.'i W~-74 ! t I I ,1 1 ' T ., .'r.'r',1 I..11 '96 0 'w ' . I . - Â· f' cov~ Â¥ & I . A-7==W= . 1 ..A 1 , Â· &4,+ 1 2/.4 . . - - ..... : I. J . .r . . ..1. - .r .â€ž,1...#-17 -Â· . ... 1 4.I . ..4 ... 4 Elk' 1 9 4 . k. I 1 - i . .7 4: r 1., .â€ž#11. .flp,hor'f -1 -1.1 reo. â„¢ ..1 , 1,1 U . i 1 1 1 .... ' IM.'qi'>lyÂ·Â·Â·, ~ 4* 4 bA; 4*2 zt â€¢ â€¢ MI'll .1. 'r, I ' - . ... .1 J '6.,,~1. 4 '. '.4.41.-I . 1.-r 'r 4 .... t. .1 i. . â€¢ - '.J 4...41.10....94~ . 1/ *.5 Â· I -*/ I - . ' - . # Â· , . . '-:,-/-36'~ 'li~~52~1!tÂ«f~-'-tr4*:tii"":jiL'itbER.Ulca.r.-t"'2:4t-.V;-i'.- . I ... 9, . ' ... Â· Â·' ..... f />' Â· Â·nÂ·t,r- ... ..4 . .. . 1 - . . , , I, 1, . 444**k#44"%M A,x.4 ..;.,A.At., W,i,4.â€¢.4*0,/*..4'eN.1 ;_.4*44<43 6. , 0, 5 2 .. .'.l~r:.'....t:.â€ž,1.0....2..'..;.. , '. Â· .. ..5 4. . . 1 Â· e . . MEMORANDUM TO: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office AE< RE: Report on the Elli's Addition and Restoration DATE: November 4, 1987 Alan Richman asked me to respond to your request for information on the Elli's addition and reconstruction/restoration project. Following is a brief account of the approvals and subsequent problems with the project. 1. Historic Designation of Structure Owners of the Elli's Building, at 101 S. Mill Street, requested historic landmark designation along with seven other structures in February, 1987. Designation was accomplished by adoption of Ordinance 5 (Series of 1987). The building had received a historic rating from the HPC of "5", the highest score in their rating system used in January, 1987 to rate all undesignated historic buildings in Aspen. It was clearly a structure highly eligible for designation. 2. HPC approval of the addition Expansion plans were first conceptually presented to HPC on January 13, 1987. Meetings were held by HPC from February through June, 1987 to finalize approvals. Conceptual approval was given by HPC on February 16, 1987. Final approval (public hearing) for the addition was granted by HPC on March 24, 1987. The plan approved by HPC was to restore the original building and wrap an addition around the structure, adding 8,045 square feet of floor area to the existing 4,024 square feet (FAR of 1.3:1). A lot of discussion took place about the massing of the addition in relation to the old building, setting it back from the Main Street elevation, keeping the height of the Main Street facade within 2 feet of the existing building's height. HPC was general- ly satisfied with the applicant's concepts; and various refine- ments took place as a result of HPC's comments. Staff generally supported the project based on the representations which were made. A condition of approval was that a detailed restoration plan for the treatment of the existing Elli's Store shall be submitted to HPC for final review; restoration shall be accom- plished within 20 months after C.O. is issued for the addition. 3. GMP exemption for enlargement of a designated historic structure . HPC's approval of the project constituted final City approval for the addition according to the Historic Preservation GMP exemption in Section 24-11.2(b), stating: "The enlargement of, or change in use in a structure which has received individual historic designation." At the time of review of the addition there was a clear understanding between the HPC and applicant that the existing structure would be "restored". This understanding was embodied in the condition of approval, and presented no problem for the eligibility of the project for the GMP exemption. NO review processes were waived. If this project had been reviewed under the growth management quota system for new commercial development, employee housing, energy conservation representations, and additional scrutiny of visual impacts and site plans would have been required at a minimum. In the GMP process, HPC would still have been involved in its review of the project, while P&Z would score it and Council would allocate the quota for new commercial space. The project was not subject to viewplane special review because it was determined that the structure would not project into the Main Street Viewplane. Please note that the historic preservation GMP exemption was discussed in the Historic Preservation Plan Element (page IV.11). The Planning Office stated that in our opinion this exemption is too broad and projects should be reviewed by either P&Z and/or Council besides HPC. However, the consensus of the P&Z was that change to the GMP exemption is not appropriate and therefore no action was recommended in the Plan. Changing the terms of this exemption has, however, been conceptually accepted by Council as part of the Code rewrite, and is being forwarded to P&Z for thier consideration. 4. HPC's approval of restoration Various approaches to restoring the existing structure were being considered by the applicant until a plan was presented to the Committee on June 23, 1987. A June 19 letter from John Cottle, project architect, explained that they had determined that the existing clapboard-sided north wall and the entire parapet wall above the storefronts could be braced, removed and stored on site. Those walls would be repositioned, powerwashed, and damaged boards replaced to exactly match the existing. Other detailed representations were made in this letter that HPC discussed and approved. Within the approval, the applicant was made responsible for informing the Planning Office when any replacements were necessary, so to minimize destruction of old materials and be able to inform the public of what is occurring. Both HPC and staff were concerned that this restoration plan was unusual and sounded risky. However, the project architect successfully argued that the wooden frame building was so unsound to require this radical technique and that the applicant was sure that it could be accomplished. 2 "Restoration" is defined in the proposed new Historic District and Historic Landmark Guidelines as "The act or process of accurately recovering the form and details of a property and its setting as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of later work or by the replacement of missing earlier work." Staff and HPC made the call that the removal, restabilization, and repositioning of walls, with minor replace- ment of damaged materials exactly matching the original, was an acceptable approach of restoration. The focus of discussion was treatment of the building's exterior so that minimal replacement of original materials occurred and walls would be stabilized to ensure survivability. Upon reflection, staff now believes that this technique might not be considered appropriate again because it has caused so many difficulties and the sense of the community is that the internal structure of a historic building is also important. The Glidden House was similarly dismantled in 1984, however, it was "reconstructed" with new materials. Many in the community were upset with that technique too, while others feel that the end result is acceptable. 5. Tree removal and landscape plan Removal of the three large spruce trees on Main Street and a new landscaping plan were approved by the Parks Department, subject to Section 13-76(D)(5) of the Municipal Code, on February 16, 1987. CCLC had a number of meetings on the Elli's sidewalk and plaza area design from February to June, 1987. Elyse Elliott gave staff assistance. 6. Subsequent events On September 22, 1987 Heidi Houston and John Cottle came to talk with HPC about rebuilding the walls entirely, informing HPC that the old walls were structurally unsound and there is evidence that they are not original. Staff explained that without use of the existing walls, there would be no restoration component in the project; therefore, eligibility for the GMP exemption for historic preservation would be nullified and the project could not be occupied without a GMP allotment. As a result, the applicant did not make the request and pledged to fulfill the "restoration" plan. On October 13, John Cottle presented a plan to remove asbestos sheathing behind a portion of the existing walls. On October 16 the procedures were described for this operation in a letter from John Cottle. Subsequently, in a meeting with Paul Taddune and the project owner, architect, and attorney it was stated that the asbestos sheathing would not be removed, and therefore the walls would go back up without the boards being removed and reposition- ed. However, the contractor performed the asbestos sheathing removal anyway during the following week. 3 The most recent problem is that we now find that the existing walls do not fit back together given the new structure which has been built. Heidi Houston discovered this on Tuesday,November 3 and contacted the Planning Office for an immediate site visit. Due to problems in making old, weathered, and out-of-square walls go onto new square infrastructure, and possibly mismeasurement, the north wall is approximately one foot shorter than supporting structure and the corners of the east and north walls do not come flush. We believe that this is a very significant problem. Unless there is objection from you or City Council, we intend to stop the project until plans for dealing with this are submitted to the Planning Office and approved by either staff or HPC. It may be necessary to cut back the supporting structure. Another problem brought to our attention is the location of mechanical equipment on the rooftop of the structure. It is visible from the Hotel Jerome sidewalk. HPC plans do not show this protrusion; although building permit plans do show the equipment. If this equipment protrudes into the Main Street View Plane, it should be removed; if not we will insure that it be screened in a method to be approved by HPC. sb.ereport 4 MESSAGE DISPLAY TO debbie skehan From: Bob Anderson Postmark: Nov 03,87 8:53 AM Status: Certified Urgent Subject: ellies report Message: please ask allen to prepare a complete report on ellies. what happened? under what authority? who was involved? did allen review? what typical processes or requirements were waved or avoided? what was steve" s role? can we get air/vent systems masked? I NEED ASAP> REQUEST FROM COUNCIL 11! by next mtg bob .. ASPEN*PITKIN REGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT OCORRECTION NOTICE â€¢STOP WORK ORDER Job Locatedat 101 S. Mill St. I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and have found the following violations of City, County and/or Colorado State laws governing same: Stop Work on Restoration. No Tenant Finish Work. The preservation of historic facades on Mill St. and Main St. is contrary to H.P.C. approvali. Said H.P.C. approval was a condition of building permit # 10537. Until a revised approval is obtained, all work on the historic facade is hereby suspended per Sec. 24-9.14, Aspen Code and Section 303(e), 1979 U.B.C. as adopted by the Ci i v c f Aspen and no tenant finish work shall ba permitted. You are nelrebv,gotified that no more work may be done upon tile premhes until the above violations are corrected. If you do not communicate with this office now, this matter will be referred to the appropriate authorities for enforcement. Failure to correct the violations may subject you to a civil suit for an injunction, or a fine, or both; or to misdemeanor crimi- nal prosecution, which upon conviction may carry a sentence of fine or imprisonment, or both. Date 11/10/87 - l-+1 '*ActgAor Buildingepartment Building Dep~1+fRent F'bdhe 925-5973 Phone: Aspen, Colorado 81611 DO NOT REMOVE THIS TAG CONTACT STEVE BURSTEIN-PLANNING OFFICE 925-2020 '~Un\,2_ 4<.teeRS - ASPEN*PITKIN AEGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT E<CORRECTION NOTICE m STOP WORK ORDER Job Locatedat \O\ S AA \Ll- ST I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and have found the following violations of City, County and/or Colorado State lawspoverning same: - (Rbok f)fix I / I , lo ? 1%32*~vk-12 7Â«Cq j (,1 )->44 F th Ohed-- 46.1, --, c ppfhfd *~~e:74ff e'L A j - l.33 24Â» 7 T L, 4 272Â·26*4 1 4311 h 'A 9--9 92,43?-4 4 6-'76 /1 jitiv< fEk .6-40 0 * You are hereby notifi6d that no more work may be done upon the premises until the above violations are correcred. If you do not comniunicate with this office now, this matttr will be referred to the appropriate authorities for enforcement. Failure to correct the violations may subject you to a civil suit for an injunction, or a fine, or both; or to misdemeanor crimi- nai prosecution, which upon conviftion may carry a sentence 0, fine or imprisonment, or' both. ~ Date t,l ~ 5-~-~ 29 Al) Ir-i,: *f .f, 'If./ <nsi~4:WNor Building Dep,r:ment *uildi,|g Department~hi~ne--5973 Phone: \~Aspen. ColordaoiNfil1 DO NOT REMOVE THIS TAG .li ./2*1-012- - C- 1 (D C=L E=Â» 0 4 '00 Ducir DE THI 7Â¥ 8 - -4< . . r- .~. N =~82-1(22 F00rd Q.:.1 ~ / lai 1 lar 1 - 12/84 720 A,900. 1 211/65 F-08 BEarA L) a~WT- 6 MOOPETOP PENâ‚¬T-AATIONS â‚¬1 ouorwo,â€¢4 TO BE,ACLA)DED C A *0,06 0/" PAL _ 04321 high E - \ m --C-IC>Ob Et." -i . DU FLOO F- 1 -- , - -L *r r -57 . - 0-1003 eL .< ON *COF:, T<FL .72 77 9Â»-3- .- - .Il â€¢r-- :- . 1 1 Ugg . <6- e 1 ----7--- C-los 51% k-IA L TH F.U 1Â«XE,F. FA h..1 ---ON B<XEN '.1 3 .i. iff E..I. il. fi. f. l./. C F l - ..4. * -4.,I.5, # ~I~'T~-l:L#~Tif.41 2-i-'~~skj'IWM iÂ£11Â¥* --- 4 UPI Â®901 /9 7 h01 Al A 0 - Â£ - -- A <27 A. Li =, 3 .S c d.ts ,Â· 1- n 90... 0 - /231 Â«/1-72% '24 /14 / 7*21. Â£41 . - : 24 ii,111 111;11;j, (61 1| j;!j'~'* , i ' ITT" 7-m -- _ . _ 1 [III:,11.'.':1, . , 111'll' 1. j' .1~ 13 1 Iii 1 1 li,illi Ijlii!~i'~ ~2'i \Â£Â£23.4 11/ hÂ«111 111 , i klin i '1~'1!li'ill 1,4 .1111 -- !1.Jill It 4. r m . 4.5 1 11 Iit-22/ i 49// 2/12 -9079 7 1 1- (*31 1 D 1 57Â·'19.'G 89231 Â»'722 ) 1 r C 9 j I t x_,/ 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 FUL-_1- 222-22---_21 L -1-10__3 2_3 43 -3- - - -- --- - - - -7 5 .k 0 -- - --7SnE/i-lpfuli Â¥â„¢- 1 1 1 1 . . ..AP\ .-/ Â£ \ . J. IKEr,46 1 C 51 / \\- --- /- -- i \/./ -- - . I , C 1 --- --- rwryaA > 7-78>/. 1 7 \,3~1Â£--~~~ ~ 1 - - . 4 1 1 . - 2 /1 , 97-9./9 779 9Â»*â‚¬3/ ' . w ,â‚¬7â‚¬4 9401-9/f j- 1 al }Prm=49 2,14473-- KE7 uv./tg/,01>r art,/bplhGY-14 ~ -- 1 E #- *. I .,74 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 \426/ . \8+ 1 1 028 9,1$3/~~*> i 9 ' L - U ) 1- ---6. 1 I-. lt'dhu/Del Jol,rÂ©ZI 2103 11'511+~pmaH '2035 - ,<@ 1 03,4AL '2.Hale 1 Â· -95 40 4. 44*' 1 7 . 9424% Â»14 14 - 1-309 <40 . r. . 6 3 (93 . 4) i s) l V /111113311ll'lililill/illfl~T-J~ -Ir-- - . 9 + ELL COR FF I 01 ll { 61 1 ' OCT 9 987 1 4< *-p - Â£Â»924 F~*4G -UA : 1. 1 1+0 4\Gn k,1 a.666409 owâ‚¬(Dvu..A-, 9,1/4 repAC -41~#AAk.-17 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS. LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 111611111111'J'111111[11111111 . i â€¢ JOHN C. KEPHART & CO. GRANO JUNIZTION [ABORATOliE 435 NORTH AVENUE * PHONE 242-7618 * GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81501- ANALYTICAL REPORT Received from: A & H Asbestos Abatement, Inc. Asenaun and Bob Kemp Grand Jct., CO 31 ,~i lin EPA 1.,111:,Â· 5 L L.v 0024 building material Customer No Laboratory No Ample - 10/3/87 10/9/87 Date Received Date Reported p~~ r' .i..,4-4 15110-001 sample Shaw/behind carpot f.; a mâ€ž le f t,C>! "-i' '-l'Â·J ; 30 % chrysotile asbestos; remai.nder witleral Cratr.jments A B. . rl, . NOTE: Determined by EPA method VEPA600/Md-82-020, nolarized 1.1.ght microscony. / A k froM E ~ Jit e-5 - TA+05) 1-(i 3 Amy, Lab Dir.: Brian S. 13.'11143 r MAIN STREET 4 CONSTRUCTION BARRICADE AT SIDEWALK DURING PHASE P f f ~22?0442 41,1(:jitd illit(,Flitailll~lit,Vilb tl ilibi,(1 3,*}Ejf 'jjkfititivj:tic.,Â· ij ii -: i j, ~ f i E..''f /,l~i j L ' ;itu illit irilid#,4- 4#tfl u ti ~ ~ i . b i llilgtih,//,..3 4Â· :kfÂ«,.4 ,\ l 02468 ~ *As<17131-UÂ« ~ ANY DEVIATION EAOM THESE PLANS MUST BE I . M 48!11 Â¥1/ 0'#It ' 1, 0 /9 J -- Ut m " 0 #A in m, %4,9 >A /7 , 0 - 6 -j I e 0 2 - 61 4 -- . 7 - ==m= . IP'.. -111* .0 4 5 0 .9 11 2 - I . - I. .- 0 4 -4- I 1 . . -A .. . / - A 7 4.44 - itAl W 6 13 '4..9... a **Arit.4-00900 b '01 = 1 ~1.r. 1 3 JO ... - --- " tuu .. im 2 C -1 1 0 k 1- 0 0 . '4 0 -0 0 N 11 1 i , -r- 1 9 4 ,. 4 - A - . m - A - A I. I - . - - ~ TE' -4-w..Â» ~ 4 1 9 -1 il <Ezzl---rÂ·<..... 1/ 1 5-,0 k liz 1. 9-0 1 92-0 ___ __ __ _2_t---31124_ 3.â‚¬407 rAh.3 ~ 4 1 ENLARGED STOREFRONT PLAN AT MAIN STREET - 1 F Lnl r= A- A. 0 --- - -- 0 ----- 1#104.-I- _-- Ill 11'.... .....Ill# Will i t E ~ ..741, Â·r-ij,-2 i "2 u m 0 E L rro 1.m,1 1....2 1 C lu ...... .--Ill/'-I &32?"3 83301 el Â¢*E~1 IMFF' % ~31~EW" 2 4 4 ....lili ~ t.,9 "11111-al- Illl.. I I . I ... I. . a e e e o '1 + T J 1 Jo W 13 00 1- 3 0 2C 0 0 q f/,\ a. - I 0% a 0 4 0 4 0 loill - . /-4 EXISTING ELLI'S WALKWAY MINER'S BUILDING 7 ---3 - ----~ 133'-0" - \. 6,24 07 MILL ST. ELEVATION 1.- ** Lm ,illi.+113/7mpmillililli - . 19 m ~i , 2 -- 0/~LL-:-4 3613 1.10 40,/61Â£Meimiall 1- 9 --724.~*ah , 0 t â€¢# Awa , ' ~ A 2 l.th!1 21{Â£1 B Nl fl ' , 1- 0 d,:.9 -1,":G.24334.' 4,Â·1 I m IA,2,1*. ~49Â·, >' ~ 1~.2 ,Â· '. e.liiÂ·'\ i. ' .2 _ T~*92/F#-1 1'4 ''~'~~~ '~ - m- a ) /1 L j I LA~/16,2311/!~~ ~ I N 1 . I . ' I li li Alli~lill,lillilille,i Al 4 rs '06 #Â· C f#0*t 1 # Im #41* ," /-- '1 48 1.4.* :/1./48 /.7&. -Â·#Il ' i i ,"..>:'.. 7/,0 i,'i laâ€ž .r I --1.. '06.1'1 f.,;Ptiâ€¢ - r leâ€¢~ 11@11]1 424 147 2 & 1/ /0,/,Inkill EL_-_ _.EkdLMEELZE8!! Pr'i"D Â· 4 4'1 ~getr 1.* 0 V ....= 1 0 - -------------:,--------fp..~.~maN~~~~~IJ~#~.2------7~I Inili~.Ill-Ilimllillmnlin ~4 . ~ ., . 2 4 A A e 4 I .... - -- 4 . :/.1 * 7 -- rÂ¢ JUgiA . 1*9 1,@ 401!f *.1 - - f.,0/671: 1- -- f 'pr~ 21,1** , % f= .~ ..1 , 4,0 J r, 11 - ~ . 4,25% 1 k. Lij#119 - 1121 ' i /4,0 Al#,1 1,14'" }M ---".---.l-%-*-.1~* ----i--....'-".--I'Il'~.~----I'~...MI'll"'.".I--~ JO - ~11,;44,1 ,aâ€ž#*,f*,* w 11' v .....................le...../..IN................... L ~,rhmi~a'f/,77-,V/,/. /7 x ./77 -Â«-7 1;77,0~,4*~i~-",/d,;~;Â·~~ vAN 48*li~N./Vilitwi L.4%44./ I'll//Ed/~1 illililir 0 (-1 -1.- 09 + 0 .~ -V'fil.pilf:......9.-'.'-IM............................"-/.....~........./.---/.EE.:MIS"..2;Li-:-:ii"iki'*25,4~fl~illillillililill '// 01.B/97~â€žâ€žâ€ž-JU/.L-d-*-2-5-/w,vâ€ž4-/-'-11-/,"~,s~~sp,w,câ€ž~~~,",'",",/26-5~.341--p-v---m.â€žâ€ž,--6~//~~~//~'~///~~///MMEP'""Ni//--"/-/-"â€ž/-//w"/"""//"/'"/""""/""/""//s//"//a~/~/"/"-9/"-"-"m"-~/-1 - ..7 2 ~ 11Â¢Iip ?11*\'1.,,; ~. 2,"1*,10*a"lit '4431 I. , .7 -13~' ~ - 41. 7.-I. =-1. 1.1 \11.1 J - \ 1 'm, 4 1 6 --- .'1116 . -4.. 0 4 0 L 2 /1 2 1 , 1*4 im#/61*1 ,/ 1 1 ..1 1 --1 851[10|L I F 4 r 1, ..........i IMME'Imitimlill f 1 1 'BM 01~4 ././-9 .... ../.I E -, :11%:444 1 63 i , 1 it h le 4 / V. A t.,1 t Of' , I 1 , :52. 1% -. *--*--- SOUTH ELEVATION :#:24 '87 â‚¬Â·4'7/ 1,9/r. itar,04-49,9/'0,*0%/.Â«/:/rehi*:4#~.C/, Z.7*1*,I-*ILZV'71*** Mi~~EirEiL,I--~-iz~~ 0*4 7, 1 1.64,1,ji \ li F / 110-02~ El , 1 1~41 Ff ~il, , , -1 INNE16*litâ€¢!333 11*211 9.., 1 1/7.i#Â·1 00' 1. . \ 13*.1 1 f el i / 0 15 A m)~11'[Tli/it ..,1071, 4 -" Â¥6. L I . L -/ ~ ./.'-Fl < ~~~~~~~~ "n/MM// p . 4, 1 ... - . C Â¥ ' 1 /. e . , 4 ./.~iti*,lkal 1~44 w ..0/7/ t.4. fir- -} . r /1. 1 Aff 0,$2 /42*iNk 11 1 " 194' 12 4.11 Â«v,pj m ,#icit . ----- ~~!~#~j~11,5,~ , . 4,,6..4 2...>. .....1,4,2....1.<'. 04,1 Mi , 'fbrd 'f'i it?im3 E-,~ ~&Mi~I#Wl'I~;/Z#*~ , 4*1 4 *,7-ij ///<2 ,Â¥*4*i:.41-4. F 8 fi I 1 'wk,21 4/0 /79 v , 11.}li;#1*4:,~,M,(. 14;f#j~ *s->; 0.14 m pit Y I A//Ill//Ili//Il&;i,lijiLSE,1,4//Clillill'llillillillill'llillillill'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'll 1.ili /1 ' 4 , lilliz ills*lillillillilli,I~illilillia k n .. A . - ... 7* ,..1 . ,~.(MA ri:-7- 2 afT-Â·Â·7 - ' VIV~&& -' /2 , 0, ./- . 7 a, I .Â¥W' 0/S , -6/ / 'Im. I~ 1 - r mi, H m 1 11~ 11*-11~11. 1 ~~1.â‚¬1~ I~~~~~~!*Im 1.1.1111=1.11 .*,1 1 1.1.1 1.1.1 Ii' im'j?'1,~ 1 1 M~ME'4&17 ............... .......ailili. . -*. 1. A x / /2 25> .77.7 ~//~3; 7 , i #"94"/1/lib.1//imm"I,/3 8 *11 "Atifilar"191'll""1643.e,-Il"V. e.,---.0. â€¢are,win#,â€¢.â€¢97.,4/P'Alwor #ON:,Xy,16â€¢,Sivi"I '0*4&-m~,1 ur ~1!14 'F,r , i a,M. 1 -,1 Adlitativi~*4~1 *FIAF,W-4 , 1 4'1!-Ii 44~~.-I.--- 4 - 4 -1/78*1#,Suff:~ *1 ae,. . INÂ¥5*110 1.1 4 i.*fsilill~lillilli~illillillillillillillillq , 4'"/.FwiMB'f -,Fj U.174,Fil,â€¢,t~â‚¬1.. VSâ€¢ 1Â¥ j.3 .,fli~~ -1.NI*il. ~-. 4, 14,4~i,4,7-,0,0,j 2,8*4&12*2457'44~418712#.1 iale?.:~ 1-' ll inj#422~211 :069. V)01;U#q"m.*trv#UY,4 .Im"kfwiff/,1.**"flft(22,â€¢)~At .27521Â·6~ 1.5,ki t, 4-- %% i.55*SKI ~/ Al 1 - 9--9Â« - ili~ i lil' 11 , ~5~g..ML~li~~1&~~ 41- I ijIEiumumnimm i ?14 -8,-11:7.-. 9.1 :gifti*m .4,112:,12'll.,Imi -=====72==a u. h . 4 4,4. a ./ 9 -4. . 4 i ZÂ»==== *491%641 ur*=26-1121~ _ - -- 4 -Att-- .---I Y; 16 W U"i . r ~ - '0=1 1 , 14 g '94>{: ' - =_ Niwilit , ;li 0 1 hi J -- JIL =.1. '57. K \ I U''' tHi /1 9.414/7, 4/~.PL / 0 - 1 "Â· ~ '6,0 ~ 5 1//#47 11 1. . r ./.4,4 50 - *(4 4 /9 4 ,Â«9 1 /7 - fi- ----- - _. ,_ ~ Ly*01 Â·23' 1. ' . E- /'b~*,~ F 1 i-44 '3-: P - --- /2 / 1 -Ill - -- 1~- ' I i. - *. ,- -- --- - .4 I 1 - P, + --- 4 . -/-2-- X 1 ..&. ~:-. -- 90- ,/ f. '.,yA . , J. , . -4 1- - - -- 4 P .1 0 ... 1 ~ -- 1 0 2 1 TTI ' 1-*-6.-k.-Al#,Eyy/Di 43$,fr Y _ "f 1 . <-2 , - . 'I . I 71 1./.:, J 9 i f . , ,. p 4 i .1. 1 1 4 J 71/1 54 Â¢1 AI i - Fbi - 2 1 11!.2.614-11 - 1 l, Ve.9/lt tfitiW#Jâ€¢ ,: i .; - .~i.j. \-4*:j't:'I ir-,4;+6 I. " f 1 Hil 1 f. '11\ I 9 F 1 0 111 1" 1. p K 11# 1//P'. I / 1 / 7 6-4 -./.-- 1. .4,â€žU: ' , 2LJP. ) 1 m vii, ~dia h <:1 : r ,Â·. z L _ 4 Â£ 1 N 1 -.',f \ \ l . Â·1~/1'' 1, 1'&'p~ , Ar / ~1 5 VEÂ·*rEÂ·)91 2 -- , , Â¢34~/0, 9 :/ u.2 - /i,9,0%,AA ,10,7., 11 ..l .8 1 0- 4 51{fl 1 1.11 41?12 , 41 2. .a' 5 f : % 1, ill . + % '. f. ' a V/"/'. , 0 'f I Â·-:9<f ... 0.1-4.. U- . 7 ' twa - i f/ . fi ' 0 Ck=/i / 1 f 72 4# lul 1 7/ ..., P -I I i 1 j , j, r.o n . , 6. If .a' 411 4 &1 17 1 I - 16(9 ' L V , t .tr NY -Â· ~4 '1 - ~ .- t~/Ul - 1 p - ' " 4 ~14Â»' f ''r h ,+41, ' - Â£ g .1 It .0 -4 44 .fry:ic,ti. - - , '*44 Â· / / 1 I l 7 4~' v ~&3(1 .- Ita . D - 0/ Ji, 1 - 1 - 111 1 1:li 11 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~29~ Â· 25 - 1. ..... 1-Â· . - ..% l. I -- -% 462 '' t. . 7Â»114-7773 mer - ' kn:Zi\ Â·.4'Irr,40~~~~ Â· U'.*14 4% .f. -...=.2. ..... 1 y: , + 2.1.21 4: I I 4 -1 1 -3-Â»#. / I { ' 9'Emt Y f Tf 4 Â· r-r k . . . 4 4 1 MILL STREET ] 16 \3'Â· 001 . - 1 1\, r ' ' /2. / f , ,-'+ 4 1 - - ff ~1\ 1 4 . L " 4 - I f 1 - ' 4231 . ~id .- " -'.4 / h. /r H . 1 ''"mp k-- 1 . - 1 ' I i b , , A Al 1 I t r- J e. 1 / % 1. - .1, ght<:EN'Li 4 - *30fo/~ ~ ;~ r x ' i , i '1/1 1 1 - fill' , 4 5 I gil 'f~ , , '1 1 ---2- -%. 4 /- N P 2- - , 1 \ 1 . U,",f ... - ~i, 411-1 1 >--2.--* _94/ /1 93 11 l C-/ y 4210Â« 7 Â»Vl,4 > V%/EST ENTRANCE TO ELLI'S - .Ill. L--- - - -- 4.- - - -- - - l Mer-*3-/ 4 -9-f-Â» Â»4 4 /Ab.Â£.2 %\*:. t.iA Â£ --335 .pree>~ 1& r VT x 4~~P /4.*-1.-9-'- - , ,~.:. 4 1 'f .,.1 i N *1\ -*/.- Y<X\\140 '7.-Â«J '' 7\ . 4% 3% \r L / s Â· . /' 1 ./ Â¢,1 I ./ a 4 i e . _ -c . r... . #F. ....4~ >2 *1 q..: ~ *MAA&4V A , ft ~14-L \:36 kÂ· 1. 11 .. - - -= â‚¬ /k 42 4 e. &. 34.- . A. 4 >4 ?<w a. ..0 - 11" W. , 6 1. i '434 1 i ' -.. 8 7.4 , *kl 41 fy-~m/Fi -"A 1/ 41,Â·'6 ..,AL#,p - 31\ .4.- 1 4. .. .k- Ilt r 1 1.. ,Â£ H \0 4 1.... qtr 9,- , 0':*S*Al W:4'42* IN. 0 9-- i *43/ , L Â· V.Â·- I : I ' -/ \14 4 - d h . ./1 --â€ž. - ~Clk . 1* - 4Â« . .-I. - - L ...1- - ... 7 . ,7 h 1.. 4 k-- --- I ./i. &V-d&. 1....'-1--TP-..'.-Illi~.4 . - --- 4,7 6/:-222------------- - 7, >ft*90----- .-I 1,&2,=i E-Â«z==- - 1Â¤kÂ«- riti / E-21 V-'--1 3 i 1 3 4 4,44 - . . r -' -I- '1 - 'i Pl 1 1- 4...A w #712 0-- -- Â¢ 1. 4 fil ---- I tr ; 2/ / - I -- --1 Â·f %& 11/*97- Â£/, p, ' Â£ / I - \ /04, Eft /., 9 1, ' . I -, .1 i , \ 1 -r-1-fr - 7 r # j - â‚¬=F~ ~ IE[1%~ c 2 . k / / r -- \. "J 'p_Â· r.Â· r / , /4'.. I ) i' , . F 2 - W, y -- 1 ,..0. - ,Â·.F ' 1,Â·i ,0-4 it ,27L F r . 1 \ 6 4. ; 0. r. 7 1 1 - 1.. 1 1 1 ff '11' 1 1, 41. ..% -- - - 1 11!lim - 1 .1 -1 ---- i 1 - --- 1 - 0 ... â€ž- ======-~--- 41 1 Â¥ .-- M t â‚¬=Pa - - - 4----~-U4-â‚¬--,NES=*247*illuranHnIYFYIAN} 1 1 4#'t '19 1 '' ...,f ''1; '. ./. -=,4 - 4/ dUM. $ ' ' , .-1,----- -------- L J -- - . 0 - 4 -/4$-. *:*. --* .-*.I % - * *- - t-t,--fi-%K--P=4.4 .1 2 4 + b-1 . iiI! 1 PIE:$1 1 11 . ---- // ' I . .... . 'y , -A. * Â£ 01:r III.#6. - A.011~Ell. iwillmi~li~ililimilli _-Al./.iRw/nnu./01...aw".1.In i.1.41/9,9/vilrvil- .n A#tilawllilliillici 2//1.m'.1.11-~mf#/*Fall-luum,MU.WilA MIWL<.Wily'ull'bory'liummi MAIN STAEET 7 KI YArÂ¥ 4 -r, 1,4*- VIEW PLANE 102.2' . E. MAIN STREET e ( 100.00' ) 99.95' FIELD SCALE t4 1 INCH = 8 FEET 04 70' -- -*).- lcIT' NW 'EN OR COTTONWOOD TREE HOR OR SPRUCE TREE CTRIC SERVICE METER TREET VIEW PLANE " 16"E RADIAL LINE PER -9-87. 4 IOO.00 T.O.C. 1 ST FLOOR D FROM BENCHMARK SW COR ,DDITIONAL INFORMATION ' PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION LONG E. MONARCH ST. T OF THE CITY OF ASPE N Y. DATED 1-6-87 USED IN , MI BUII 112 8"SEWER MAIN 98 SS ..* j I. BANK OF ASPEN DATED T'465.31Â£63AP5, Â·4335320*2. 198/ SIGNED C D~*VID'-W. MCBRIDE R.L.SÂ·'1*R' NOTE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED 1.t...- UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN SIX YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH ./A//1/G ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, NC. 210 S Galer: St.. P.O. Box 2506 DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE Aspen. Colorado 01611 COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM TAE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN 13031 925-3816 HEREON. .. ./-- ./ ; Â· 4/ Â·#.'r,/I. . 4: - '. JOB NO. 16360 i . //0 *. - - . -4 i .. 1 0 .413 .. . S I . :. 0-0 .... . ...D'. . * 0/ I . 00-:' F 0 .::. 7 4. . t 0. '~i4~~, , 0 . 4 . 1 0 . . 0 . 0. . 00 4 4 D. I . .0 : .Â¥V//Ff 0 0.1 . ... 1 -1. 1 0 : 1 e. 0 ... 0 1 - 1 . -0.. .- 0 ... 0 1 0. . : A- . 0 0 0 1 . 7 0 4 . ..1 -1 ... 1 .. . 0 . I 0 . 0. . .. .... 0 0 - .. - 1 A- A ... . . 4 ' A- -A . ... ....... . I .. . 1 V ... .. . a ... .: :0 - . - 0 0 A . - 0 0 .-AD. h. A .. 16.- ., I I . .. - 8 * im,1...ill... *...\ wi 7 71 1//14/.9, r.., . . . Â£... ..1 1 . . 4 0 0 . . .. .. A . . ..:. 0 - 0,0 - D - D 1 - ' 0 0 ... 0 @ ...:. , 0 1 0. . 0 D. 1 - 0 0. . .- . :. D.- ilh . . . . .. 0 1 + .-0 . D 0 .. . 0 . .. 4 4 0 0 - I. 0 . : .:0 -0 D . 1 0 ... *.... , D . - . .. 1 0 - 1 1.4 .. - ==':-i./.--- -2-. m.& I I.-Ill~~--~3 1 : AZEA OF COMN toe TO ae ZE- PLA#Â·ECh \Â»4 NEW Tb OLD AT A. 450 ANec-6, 2 METAL CAP PLASH/kle 725 0 - 1 4,0 1 L ~\MAEÂ·+1 9Â·OF/LE OFâ‚¬*STG,Â· 4 ft/34 449, - li 0â‚¬GOG,â‚¬1â‚¬ Ar aDts-htâ‚¬P-Â· ~ Moue 90#T/Mt-r..IM TO (LOFÂ·NE,~- 1 12-1 i ill REA./77931, _ 0 @ Sorro,1. j PATCH ALTESÂ·NATE COUBSES / I fr 1 1 - SEA/**AG- /90735 720 MA//4./ Â¥Â»â‚¬/U- FAC.4055 w# NE~ 90146. PATCH eet / 1 0746# *SK 1 6/0,1-H SPE 5 AT DAMA(bâ‚¬.0 7'72464 AMEAS, 918456 6/EN COURSES *1/ 0101\15 =?Kot,4 + 0 Â«,O 26(%5 -7Â© FI r erpÂ«,ex *4073 0,â€¢6 NOT- Ub /2. AT DAMâ€¢650 6/0,66 PWTOH OFA REFAIFI HAVE OIscraAMPLE VERT. CUT-Â· | ' 0,5 2657- /Â°066/062 */77*007- /effvy,â€¢.6. Baphia OBÂ· WEEDS TO 56 REMO\JED 97 5, WHEMâ‚¬ 610/6)6 /5 u*,4*6â‚¬0 6690610 Pgwipe NeW CAP Fll..Â»416)6 Ni \<- thl.~ . rkew RE,=Adigo, eND O/73 72> SE crip epe:,6 - ptor. C.ONTIN)000Â£, 9-4. . ,>~11â‚¬h\Â¢-U-f--T JTTI- .1 -Ifill l:ji N l/lilit/lll 'IN flilll WINN i N / /illf i. N j ll/l/li.:iff 6 I ' :n. , MADE 57463â‚¬08-60 ~A-r A sruD. 7-,-â‚¬ FOF LeÂ»~t OP MSEBL 34 + 4.45Â°Â£ 32,+T TWAT CA A) 86 ve.O 5,40UCÂ» 06 - râ‚¬ -USED â‚¬Stâ€¢Jeteeâ‚¬ -< f 4, BEFE< -re:> KrrAC,-169 -ent/Ck op= to#,21)81 \ Aix> Ne.w ve#Â·TICAL, FLAT TÂ®M - - % r# 400111Â©NAL NOTES â‚¬1 P~j Al- /NS'Er#(LirtoNS 5 92.reFL To ATrACH eHOTOS Jor'/6123 FOF 11 . P \ 5657-OF-ATION @ M}LL ST<667, Be,4046 053+1<LE. 10*o JECT#Od 71/ AACHI-reCT Aj Flet-D oritota. TO AL - L MOVE EAST ADD 1 1 \ . b. 6,C... Tb Coo FKDWATE 4,6SrOAKEION PLAN &441(517 *eer +E->2#f~~4 \-- y - ivia VAL OF toARDS. *0 71-6 75*//5*60 WA/DOWD**11 , t' 1 1! - AfteA Of= 610/&16 REMOVED FE>8- CRANE 1 - STA#9. fÂ«PAIA. Fl PATCJÂ·t 5/0/Ae te'EFC'<E #te/AST-ALLAT-1 00. ~ -1 1 1 1 1 1 Â·1 ! Â· ~ 4 6/66,U COMSâ‚¬,3 OF)/0/Â»6 11 11 J111111 11 1 1 k 1 - \1 \ ~ L Wl Nele â‚¬AIC'TR<j,4 TO MATCH f i â‚¬)0517*8 1 .5â‚¬584 aS Â£5077-OM , ~) TO Prr Ge-ADE . r Eqt*VEr,ONT 1 1/ 1 VEPWIFY LOCAnON OF \ 1 ECIST-INe â‚¬,IDINe CONG. C.U#6 4 SUSTe. L I . TO EX578. ,567*LS A/0.3 j X~ 07/24-/ el) _L r- - 1 St- \ EXISTING ELLI'S NORTH ELEVATION ao.veâ€¢ am< - ~ NER IX 7-8/tl ~ . SESTORAT / ON PLAN â‚¬ 4 ; 1 ll' lel rh DelÂ»L @ W,Noo,Â·J Cof<NEF:k 55/2/fÂ·ki T Yeg- k' S 112! H A -r y P E-e , m 6.3.407=g' 0&. 1/6 - 78 T.9. p\*k ~*EW RETRACTA A \*Â·''A45 -- 7.O. 03, AL 90>Â·6 7-. o. sl.Z EL 89 -O, \.AGN FLANE 169-0 F>. 2. F.**M,46 Â· EL. 119 - /62 4 L./64Â¥ Frer.1,4. _4~- Â£*. T 61&44 TYPE- 4 - 14â‚¬11' 60/47/+FINK TO 1-IcvtneÂ· 4'-34 -71*irl 5-IN' 3'AE ~unD A 4 - TÂ· o. FL~f Woom d. EL. 1/ 1- 9 V*-1 1 > Â£027-R*12&-E AWL#UGS C Ek-/43 PAA-~24_2 @Ule K.Or * Â£Â£2*04Â· 7.77 EL 10 V - 35 '00 - ' .|'::I/1 1 1 Ull'.._ â€¢ TÂ· 0. wdc.. 1 en 18-0 1.1 -002 2 A-'699 1---4 7: CP. 4,4. i -' Â·- -Â·--~ 54' 7,Â·Â·â€¢4. V Â·1771,75 2, Tr/9 -L--1 15.9 ' #Tj /Â» WLLIÂ·'44 , *L. '20 . 72 2,4. Â»42â‚¬67. 4.20 - 14 1 b g}-,Or/Idag Â».f'p, 40 KnO# a-, Ad.G[)1 *- 1 **4 A /741 419 f. p. 527 2.7 kÂ«'~ i/// '2, ~l)1 1 0,.7 N 1 <-~ .' lA j i j>~15.f?Lt ' ~Â·f'.i- F.Â·Â·Â·Â·,~~-v).. f f ..{. Â·~ Â· / .'Â·.2,.,11 A <~ /j \ AA) 1 Ul> I ... p. -. f* - - ~. r . EJREV/6 1, 7-24-*~~ \AU Â¥V\Otch â‚¬.fl,6}1160Â·- Awlp'(11 1,.0- 1 4---* ac. M. 04 *AÂ·,ah,Â¢64 A..4- * ./-/... '-*id/lill 0*AST EM166_BIJ GL.EVATION ELEMAI[QNB ~ #24'*:13.9. Th e 0 : Im#'<unlj f ~.4,4..CudI~ -VI - - 6 Viv: Â¥ ...... /0 - I . .... 1- 0 0/WZ h 1--. - --k J , ...1- - . 1211/5, ...41 , 0.94- f, 0 - 13 -' 0 .. - -- 1- ilm - W - 1 I L 0 13 1 . - 0 9 . ...Ii-11 . 1 1 Ill. i ~~000-3 1// ..../."/ 1 :8 '1 - /1 -- i C li//al./Mil- al ~ 1.1. .. : 0 - ;64 . 2 L.-------d I ., 4 1. a 4 a . . , - I t - --I -'.--6 A . Ill . , A . â€¢4 . .7 - 0 1,/I.. . . 0 . J J 1U .-L 00 . - ah A 6 a Â»-1 - - , - 1- R * f ~--02 " -#Em i./ 1~1 1 : E--7//E k i--- -*- . 1 . .. ...1 0 . 4 . ....1 el y 4 0 ' 1 ~-=1 1- .. ..imill.......Ii - *Imill~ Â»f Coi* 11 1, l ,,r A Â· 1- . \ .*.. . .0-- . .. . 4* 0'a .1* .:*. 1 . I. 1. I - 2.. 8 L :202" . i 1 - - 0 all, O J - Ul I .<.';ill ~~-*'I- , I . . '. I. I .L'. 0 am==- Ill : i' I . A. 1 ,- I 1- - 4 4 41 0 4 * - t. 4$9 - 4 4. . S I I. - 4 . * - I I I. . r.*44. Il Â· 4 '. 7 * . A /1. J 14 2 I '. 4 . - ,-L. . t. C , . L.lk ./ -- N... 0 P . - - F . 49 5 -1 J Ul - . I r.4 - . ... 2 f r.-- - 9 a . 0 I. -' 1- .:. 4 12/1 165 4 - Â¥ -- . 1".2 - - -I :.- . L, 1 I.---- I - - . . 4 - e , â‚¬ -4 .' 4 Â·. f b Jâ€¢ 0 -1 e 0, 0 Ul I 0 4 ..1 - 2 ... D , 2 4 Ab"' ' ' Mi u 'Â·MÂ·:.110,1,1~~,u j~vimV56LZELL81Â£111.2:221U2EE!22.12:LE.:worm,AB"r.; In iui,ItUP* 1Â£u.Luu/1.1. 'fit f 'i. 4 4,~ 4. ' I ls: Il .ifillvallinal~ F...Ie:WE 1/I//i/"/Am<.9 *#*1:I::Mill'lo~Mill/â€¢ -4/ 9/Yal"Â£01<1/117:. ~al,"A "LZE..I -=-- 1- ---- _ --T W....i.i.,Ar,~ -2~~~-~~~47J 2#47;~~4%1 12':0 - *.*..I./-1,-I'-I.*-.-Ill- '-I.-Ill.-*.I---I-Il.--I '1 - -I.--Il-* I U, 1 1./ 914*64/ I **Â£22- %- V- 42*3. ;**i iw,I ** ~Ar f~*I ' 44164144â€¢ 1...................................Mu=I...,1.,1--5.1---- 17 ii '/1,0/Ak \ : 90/ 'A + .r\. 111 - 71 1 -4 11 ,~jill"ll'Iill:"Ill'"#2'54#:969::21?AÂ¥Z:f~ Efi 1 . 1 ./payal./Mil"Il.li ./FU/49 / 9:Â«,. 5.. I -Ilill~ 1~ ailliia 9 ':fr#Feall #2;7'ND:27;4' 772,1 ...,-.---,~,Iu-...1"mia#,A,ji.=.. -/54,~ Â·-- '' - j il# 4*it*"~'~k 'Al,''1,11.41 i'/.Ut anhâ€¢*71,4. . , ,.,AL '.Vit,: '4.4"~~~87'84 .9. / iIA ~ '/77 '9~' "f,/h â‚¬57/,Lâ‚¬/A :i ./4 0 4,Â» 2 , '' I.. 6 / -Â·:~ . . 4,4V,4Â¢ '13. , ~ 6 LE 1,62 :,i/#35, , 0 " ,/41, b/#. ba- - *. 4/ 4, ..0 1 64 11/j'* 9 1.11 Bilm' i *.2,Â·~> 'f' lifil ; ~i)#ity~914*~hi#k 8~4~'~FZ-* - -~ 1 +5Ft,4+11 42&46Â·<;Â·}~1100 , 1 7:09'll p.4*)144302*4 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2 li~g/& igU.6,:FirviLTYM' 1 ':WhikA / p#~M, ) 'FA 4, ';*flf;.41Â¥fâ‚¬Ri,;i; */'lilli/4 , 9,5/6.ki/'*~7'#t , 1 " 7~4~ ~3~,r~ k t"<JlliR,bil: #I: ~100 ~1 ke,~ 1 :42 1.44)14*.1 I'./047(,Ii ~ In- 1 / A A . - -6 opeJoloj uadsv opejoloo uedsv S.,779 01 NOI.LICCIV 4 ~--~~ EXISTING ELLI'S L 13 310'4- . . 1 ---- 0 STAIRWAY - VIEW PLANE . 4 WOOD TRIM ' 1 r-- WOOD SIDING -0 , -- i - t --- 4 1 11 /-2 *fi / . 4/Ime'lum~MI# 1. 0,11,=1 I'*MMG,imz97'14' 1/lemed/dAM*'11 tky/11 1 \ 11.=-24,wANI i.-4R*4 /// 2 ff - Â·1, #t $ 1,2 't i // 1,1 rs 2 f ' 190>it *l,4 UZZII . . MILL ST. ELEVATION - - 1 - 1 g fee !961 4 MAIN,STREET - Existing h 1 111111 11? jBM, 11" 'f'1*142 1 1 'Wf N\ 1 4 1 1 11 11.11 Itt ' 1 : . . .94-, 0 111- -IL f 4 1 111,1111. -fi 1 1 -- -- 1 -=114*Â«-tit--~-ii - ~i#4'.i,-J" p-J",erl p'jÂ· " 11- ~.at~o '14'k, 1' q " W . W, Â·i, 'll[ Ii ZI' mÂ· 11;i & 4iu IlkÂ«> ~ -t-3 --111 11' 1 1. J.1 1.- i. y -7 111 1111 1 -11 i V I ~ 1 I. ./E. '09 1, i,re~. 1 -1 F -i Ill~ '5,-~ fÂ¢ 1 - J TkÂ·-1~ W . 1- L . *: n LÂ£ - m\\, Â· I //,1 .71, Â· - vii o ,-1- ' 4-29 =* a* 1 fi;44 New deciduous <~.,**12*lmj*1 -li- 11-111 trees (3"min.)-- 1 4 -= 11 .,. c~.. '' IA I -2 n f.. 1 1 1 44Â·~f -ls --f f> E - Existing - r ....#". , / 1-A - - \4 1.311. 1 : ct I --4 1 4,4=141 1 #~.-& ~- New sod . / 1 . Â«i fo. /5. 11 , . C /1/- 1 ...- 2 1/ 1 /. \1 . -2 Â«2 1 4-r-- r>4 X- I L -ricâ‚¬/ 4 __ZE=*7 To ~e~ran=NU~atea - Patterned/textured - _- I . ~I-54:. 2. / ) concrete (snowmelted] n \L-'At r- 3 0- A 111 , New evergreen =n 17-1,4 #9* trees {3" min.1 \, 4 I --4/ -09 K. ' 01 UE...*. 4 W A : MINERS BUILDING \21171 BUILDING ENVELOPE -......AIN: 24\2 1.4 h 48-0 mr,4 F . .7/ L A ..4.0 I , , Lb-Landscaping materials :1.4:2 142 \ - 1 ,- 1.r, / 0 4 '\ f 4 4 - I . - Flower boxes Ityp.) iM -PLL ~- f- i r. Existing r =-f i 03*0Â« 7 1 1- Al P Ir-.73 -~Â·-== 411 30 1 Â«141{, . -fLQ-~- -r-4,1 011. le . New by owner r 1 /1 - I /k\,1 .JEW-11.--19. Ch:-j- 4-2 -- 111 ~ ., / 2.a-11/,-a-hALILILS-y- -~ 71 .2-7 i. fl + 'i-~,-lÂ· Â·,iik,1~~10:it'4 1' +16 7.4 Evergreen trees ~: k254 -Â«All (.3 ~ m== ---_ 4<172 - ExistiAg to remain , 1 Â· ' P ' -~E_.__.__ _ . __ ,,~5 , 1:1 I 3 1 1 -911.-*44* h -19*6[FA: 7/r . I 1 /-Â·~IM*~. . a U -=:CU "111 1. = .01 00*' I < A // l 1 1 fl' 1* 1,/ c--lf) 'â€¢ 1 11=7 7* -2 -1,1 A TRASH / 4 . . ' 11 111':t.Il \/ a Â»34 1 To be removed . ALLEY LANDSCAPE PLAN ~tj EXISTING & PROPOSED C-, 2112167 1/8": 1'-O" I La.Jitâ€¢24 PIAn 44 - mal.1.8 71/IN ~~221 -~CE-~ 4 t HOTEL JEROME MAIN GTREET RELOCATED SPRUCE t,i /7 f~f,44Iii-i,KA,l~~ \ \ -47.- -41 - ..1 11--1. '-\ M MVP 1\ 1 . til , 4 9Tt\1141 6 I fl-'-1 f-Â·Â«jurÂ»Â£91 r'/J ' /44 - 4 1 fi:Â° ~ '%*..1.1,6 4,44\'9' ,# , 4~l.U'j~h k-:A*1p*6cqj*J~~.AF,Jt'F L"AMIHI< 11't.-,d'11-.ruM-.- di':10/,i.:r'.41. .0*'./4.1;. L. i t,ZI <flgil: - -11 ~ \ ~77 7/ Â·Mt - \ - 11 % -- .4-,4 - ., th-1.1 , .:2 . *1- ~9-.~".4/-~ .... . i ... 1 1 - - I -GI ..,1 // . ,. 1 - =.1 11 Â¢ h. 1. I 1 0 -11 - 1 , il . 11 A 1 -- ; - 4 I . 'MAIN...Ff#/6 /1/*Af' ' . . ,1 \ f t O 1 64 1 - . - 1 2% 1 1 /40, '' , 17 ~1 â€¢ PAVING TEXTURZ IMa~ i"'~~ .L;' 0- A p ,.4 ...~*. 1 1 - â€¢ .1 1~ - 1 --je .liÂ· ~C/'5'9 7 . . 7---a' -1 --- --- *- '-1. . t 9 k --=1.- .it.4 --1- 1 - + ' 11,. %- X y,?,7 line of - .IR,,r / - / f '' 1<.4/"/SE~,~fillit--2/~ <Pigiwilkit/- > .Â» 1, '44/ - 56//- . \ 1. -Â¥ 3 - ' wall above 4 1 --74 1 % 19 1 2 I . 1 - %4%1 . Â· k.Ik. 1 1 - -.,7 '-r<4 4 ri L+14 i 4/. n f '44-2 ~\-- EXISTING RETAIL -1 1 . , 1 5 VI . , 7 - 11--7 : A up T *1' '11 1 4640 1 1.- 0- 1.1~L r # 1 Â·-~ g f.* 1 . ' 5.-11 2.. \ dr-: 1 ---- dn--?13, 12 r -1 3 U. fl \,1./ 1 dn 4 ~ .. . ! .1 - 1 ~332- \\ i an / 0 2,Â» -* L ./ , t,Â£, 47.: 1 1+~ill . : 74, - 6534#r)41.5 3~ 1 - NPT .ch,6 2 29 - ' - - ' 2-2:t . . .===* 1 4/ 4- 1 74 1 2 -d . AETAIL RESTAURANT EXSTG. . ~.2 UL-1.11 1/ -4 L * .,,f,4 9 SPRUCE - v , ,'1/.1 Â£ 4- . - \1. I Â£ B. }Pt> 1 Â¥ 11. ,%41/ ij ;...1. Â· -V.4 U - . . 'Â·4Â·.I *3 : 44,1;L \ Â»1 / Mt (TRASW *=====U , ..4- - -u=*3% ' r -4 94,2 , 4, 1 . 1.-4 -I./ 4~1 ./ 11! .1 + ' ~ i.Â· *' s Bi:j 1 .\ .< lit- ar 4 tatÂ¥?1 -if 4- ----I- -Ill-- -I- 7 e==AL- 4/71\ *,3 1.11.. N SECOND LEVEL ALLEY FIRST LEVEL ~ 1 6672%34 9,000 48 UL,/ 01 *56 *6113 2, 20$6 225061~, /e> 9, 1999. - BANK OF ASPEN ABBULS -1-112 .M HOTEL JEROME f MAIN STREET I --A | ' 1 111. 0 iN' !, Ap4/*42*:fl''e..'P.rN//1/''ffi, 4- , . . .116 11.1 pt- -3-1 Â· 12== , -# 0 . â€¢ Â·t -LL _ 1._sk 417 3'''~~~-:-lÂ·" ' , NA 4' ~~' _4 1 .~I~.3 / 1. 1,- 111 11-YL-4- . .1 ~3-=Ltlt--U+-----1.1~-111 Ir.je*#Pâ€¢Lâ€¢'tÂ¥â‚¬.~i'Â¢~ ... -cÂ·-'41~kll~ f Z /..; - 4 | . "r , :42 . t, 4 XY . + 4â€¢ Wl - tlu I. ..,7/07 0 AN - *-Il - 1 A . 1 #1====-1-2.,Fly flt-Â· /&--- . Â· ./1,6., 1, 1 -' pbntep ~ 4 T --r. -i >~ [1' .Â£ ~ ~ . ... .u~~: e~ u~ 1Â·, I 4 h i 1 ~11 - . 1--/ - '.- 134' IttEUL_, --1,t . 'IL .r 4/.,Ii --_./ --â€ž 1-- 4 . -i. A- wall above 4 1 />fic . i . . 1 Une of i -4,4 Y t.hEL/- - p , . t-- "1./18 v 1 T .,F511-4 - 1 . 1 :. .1 I 6. n -- 1 ' 1( 21*N ~3+ . i. 1 '' ' J f T ' el ,--f-- 3 ..... 0:7,55 5 .- 44,1.-2 - - . ....5 3 , -. l. UPPER RETAIL/OFFICE ~ RIETAIL . U-VVeWÂ·,2 /Â·..IE. v W r Ill Ul r... 44 - r ,4 -./. , MINERS SUILDING - -~ ~ 9 ~ 1 . * 3, an E m i 51 f =~ . .0-4. 't : '.J 1 .1, ft - I . - - Â¥ 1 7/, k r. . - '1 - -- H-'-A- lA/- _ ~1, 4 j,:1_12.2~:CU-11.Â£--4-*6.- - Exle-rING RETAn. - 1 --...A. /// 1 --5. 4 L. ' 1 =62- .* z',LIZi< . . T rl 13/2/-/ Lr .p Â· m 7 41 -Al\, Ar' . I t. 1 1.- .... - $- ,..... Â·ch 1 . - #whz t: L -I -/ dn Â·-Liz_22 Â· . .Â· M,b' ''' '' 1 . 1 /1 -2 I t H 1 : . 0 . k r 1 441 ,\. ... 1 u. 9 i L -4 1 . 7'Yb-/liballi--t---*'* - 1 7-----7~y' / ' 7 . l 1 . e. 1 ..3........=;-a-f/ .. *044' i In U X , . ill /'-.-- I - 0 ' I I ./.- UP~ *i ~ 1 74 ~,t-u .... 5.. t \n , T: e...l - A -rik~fi. ~ -\ -- r , , RETAIL 4 â€¢ RESTAURANT - ~ '~4 , 44 -.-Z .,4., EXSTG. 7'll'' 3Â¢ i f t, 36' 0 ~' -- .9-/4.Â·, SPRUCE P U/14,1 l.# 4 /7 -/ Â¥ lf 4, ~ E , ~12.1*9. " I L 1, 21 Wr Â·, /114 I * ~.Ff/~, TRASH -- I.- /7 -61- Â·&2*14 4 1 ,1. I. . 1 . ,LI .id 1=--- ..\1,2'ty, V pl.--Il -1, .t - : ' n 1 -1 - _ 1- lilli , 9,00 -[ADOUNEÂ· -1 A 1 SECOND LEVEL ALLEY Fl AST LEVEL 849 BANK OF ASPEN C Y-. ' 23 'tal r-% 14 1 4 -2 4 Pr ortte ma 42% 4 P th- p, 9% Z U A ~0 tit go fu 4 trS Â¢ $ R u m lk> Th Z < M , 6 ft, 9 -4/- Sti , C â„¢ 2 i L ( b Â¢ 1 0 0 (14. 2 7. Â£ L & h 19 m m-1 < Â¢1 1 112 .0) 2 le B r nel ZZ. .oft j + 144 3 0 %1- \,4 \ De 1 34 Â· 0 56- *29 14 \ le g ' . 4 m) /2.1 \ 46 1 --- 0 j 4 1. -~- 1 - f. .1 ~-2 7 e* 1 I ' 7 Â· 1 r -1~ -i --1 4 ~ 1 -apl ~--~- i ~ ([T-fj~-1-1-1 t~ ~ij I 9 1.3 1 1 i ' ---- 11-T ---~ 1 ' 1 1 1 V 0, 1 1 1,1 . 6,1111 i 4 1 - }11:11]11 . 1 U :1111 2% 11. 1 I: .4 11 11 ~~ - 1 111 1, 1 11 41 1 T. 7 4 1111 i 't" . 1, 1 '1.11 lilltit i 6 - i i 1 1 1 1 1: It; - 1 1 dil O 18 I lili lilli 1 j Ze 1 2 11 11! - - -._-_1 -, --._.- ' '6 1 1 T 1.311.-1 11 111 11Â»\1 --1 1 -- ----<32) C i /- Iii 1 '11 1% --- -1 J : 1 9 . r.- \1 ~ 1 1 1,Iii t. 1 -1 1' 4 0 1 ' 'ill i\1 1% 1- 1 -1 ~ i~~~~i lilill'lli~lif'~4~ b Z tx \1 1 1. -6 9 ; 0t 1 - I' -L| ;il F *i Â» ~ 117-?Lt-J 0081 ; : *L 1-1 ' :1-i 1 OOBI .1 1 1 --0 0 -1 9:1 : 1 lili 1 1 1 / 70 b .11.1 : i | It>' I lt,1 11 1. 11.1 01-41 , ~131 1/M '' 1~ 1 , 1 1-4 -1 11 1 * 1 ' L.11-.i.~ 1 0:1 1 t---- ----- ------- ------ ------ - Il, f*L =i 1 il I 14% 1 11 1 1 11 4 2 4 1 r-x-Â·-Tr---1 1 1 1 1- 7 1 11 i 10 1 Plt I.- -1 -- - P -- -47, '4 6% 1 ~ - 1 1 / P 1 1 4.- - 11 1 1 r t:t.. '11 2'*1-b i 4 f -1 /7-i 32 - I 11 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 - ' Â£Â£11_Â» M 1 -L-, li F 22 Tr 1,8 3[1 1 * 1 1 if -- -- ----- -nt; 1 70 y) ."11-- - - 1 1 1 LO lili not 11 - , 1 ,-1 -1 T Mh 3 1 03 1 11 -1 11 1 1L - 11 1 :11 1 - 1. 1 1 1 11 1 ! ty- li. it . 1~L If:t 1 '11 trl,% - 1 1 1 , r i ----- 11 ll--L 1 11 ' Eli Â¢14 1< - mml *1 {-1--Â«ED -UT 11 m. .- 1 1 111[-- 'll 11 \,1.4 1 1 6% U /O 3.-O i Â£41 42 \Itt G 00 b > ~ fili I r MIS 3 -1 -- LATA 1 , 1: i.. - 5.i -2 1 - MRÂ¢ ; ni (A h 1 i UAzil â„¢ d- M , .,28 i F Â·t r~ r 1 ~,i 9 1 Â»/ 1 -. ir i N - 4 1 5 Â£ - .t# '/ \ 1 1 21 1 1 . .& ti - i J f I, 11 p I -i'll - 1 04. 3 - ~ 1 .1 1,1 1 . 1 .- 3. bi , I ! 1 iii fit 1 ' < , 2.-1.7 9 1 --= i . .1 1 i \Ii --1 . 'd -*i 1 4--4 ~ 1 11 1 - k 1 - . 01 01 1 '1 IiI - 1 li l i- fill r 11 MI 1 ClÂ· 4 li 1 -2 3 %34 1 /J;.3 1.1 1 - i 1~ ; .m 'Inj ] 41 (14 1 1 t, 1 2 --El :4 5 Eml y -2 Â¥- . - 1 -0 th \ 4 20 0.11 - 11 111 ./ '% 1 1 1 W 17- 1 1 - 5 Â£114 1 1 9. I -6 11*2 Q 01 st ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ . f //11 1 n 141 1-i 1.- -~ 14 - 1 - 1 7-17-J 1 | LIt - 5 1 1 j + fs/ -- 1 Iii 9 j ie . E- Â· 1 --- 1 - 1 7 i u jj F T 1.11 .1 1 1. .L_..._____._] k $ r--tr--7-1 I m i : -- . ~ ~ Aj 9* - 1 1/ - 1 1 Te 1 ~--Â·-----'---- -0- ---------Â·-â€¢ N t 11 dll ~ 1 -4 - 4 41 J iiI ~ . 1 . 511 11 k, ! ..1 M 'li 01 f XI . 1 -1/1 1 [ 0 1 1 1 11 1 1- 1111 1 4 -4 1 N 31 ' (0 . M F "0 lE 1 1 11 4 41 h-R r0 Evt ki-+Cia 4 Â£ 1, 4 - 1 h u - 4 01 0 91 ~ r, at wi --ot--- 4 'tâ‚¬ P.6 et- ..i k,-4 )$ 1 - 1 Ry C k 1 1+ 0 M r.i S:3 9 4 - 11111 1 2 f D 4 0 11 ~ r-1 1-2 1 -- f R?Q\ - 121 9 5.1 - -11 / i 0 2 Â¢(Plc\1 o 1 1 'It 1 F Â£4 RI FRI@ 1 [7-- r., ' 2 m 3 42 0 i lid-i bX , D * IX) 14 di' 0 6 0 tr 1 1 -4 rtll ~ 1 lim 1 61 323223 1 L-,----1 1, - ..1 7 +Rz #Imm 1 1, 1 1.' 1.1.1 1 1 1 -- - -0, lf*M . 1 1 i 0 + i ; 1 ,- j R & 2yc . r 4 2- 1 K cj f i 10 . lit 1.-18, M 1 .. mj M le 4 13 b th th i , 0 1 1 . roÂ¥ 70 '10 < - 2.1 Im * . 0 11 11 . 1%Â·. 4% 31 5 < 37 f th n 56 ~ IF dr ~.-i_- -i__.1-.i_Â£-1-11. j l_l....i . 1. i-.Â£1.-l_i_i--~1-1-11- l_ti--1-~2 9 4 i Dic >A .. (1\ 1 8 4 * i d :40 ------ ---- ' N 11,5 , 1 G 10 0 0 -3 1 9 F 13>08 492 Ay iNG a .. ..- .. -.. *40 .p Â»4 D C k -Â«fh i t* 73 5111144 -TYPL '8 s/21*4 T TPL k'