The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.205 S Galena St.HPC024-002737-073-46-011 HPC024-0 - Brand Building Unit 11 Minor HPC 205 S. Galena St. ... ...r - Box d p- 6 1 b i , .. CASE NUMBER HPC024-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-073-46011 CASE NAME Brand Building Roof Deck PROJECT ADDRESS 205 S. Galena, Unit 11 PLANNER Fred Jarman CASE TYPE Minor HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Richard Wall REPRESENTATIVE Steve Buettow DATE OF FINAL ACTION 11/8/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION HPC Reso. #50-2000 BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 1/3/01 BY J. Lindt .. .. * - .1 Â¥ 3- . 1 4 . ..'' -: 4 4 . N + PXRCEL ID: 2737-073-46011 DATE RCVD: 8/25/00 i # COPIES:- ~ CASE NEi HPC024-00 i ... CASE NAME:IBrand Building Roof Deck ( PLNR:2 1-Â¥ oct i,In,IAab~ PROJ ADDR:|205 S. Galena, Unit 11 ~ CASE TYP: Minor HPC STEPS1 -1--11 .. .. 4.$ :7 OWN/APP:~ Richard Wall 1 ADR 205 S. Galena, Unit 11 ( C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 1 PHN: REP:~Steve Buettow - ADR:~119 S. Spring St. C/S/Z:jAspen/CO/81611 PHN'925-2100~ FEES DUE:1480 D FEES RCVD: 480-enter in Timeslips i STAT: ~-~ . REFERRALS - r. 34**0 . REF: _Lif~ " BYI - + DUE: MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 1 1 t DATE OF FINAL ACTION: r CITY COUNCIL: -28/00 1 REMARKS , PZ: BOA: CLOSED: j 0~1' BY: ~ 1 1 EAd r 1 DRAC: , PLAT SUBMITD: | PLAT (BK,PG):~ 1 ADMIN: HAL,60 -ho 60 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 203 S. Galena Street- Minor Review, Public Hearing 1, lil DATE: October 11,2000 SUMMARY: This proposal involves expanding an existing roof deck on the Brand Building. The Brand Building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, is a local landmark, and is within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Richard Wall, owner of Unit #13, represented by Stryker/Brown Architects. LOCATION: 203 S. Galena Street, Brand Building Condominiums, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: The property is zoned "CC, Commercial Core." MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. 1 .. Response: The Brand Building is the only two story sandstone building in downtown Aspen. It is well preserved and retains the integrity of the original design. Currently, there is walkout access to the southern part of the roof from several of the upper floor apartments. These alterations to the building are mostly hidden from view due to the shape of the parapet wall. This application affects the northern part of the building, which already has a 600 square foot wood deck with chairs and a grill. It is accessed via a glass enclosed staircase which is the tallest feature on the roof. The proposal is to expand the width of the enclosed staircase, to construct additional deck area partly covered by a roof, to add railings and planter boxes around the perimeter of the deck, and to install a hot tub and permanent grill. This building, and all of the proposed additions, are under the maximum height limit of 40', so no variances are needed. Staff has several concerns with the visibility of the proposed improvements. On the Paragon Building, which recently came in for a similar review, there was a requirement to hold all improvements back at least 3 feet from the street facing building walls. No such setback is not being maintained along the north wall (Hopkins Street side) of the Brand Building. The railing proposed on the north is solid, so that snow will be trapped between it and the parapet, a situation that is likely to negatively affect the condition of the structure. Also, the parapet drops in height on the northwest corner of the building meaning that alterations in this area may not be concealed. The stair enclosure is already a very visible and therefore inappropriate addition on the roof of this significant historic structure. The applicant proposes to expand its width slightly. There is no code requirement to justify this change, but it is not likely that the alteration will be perceivable from the street. If the enclosure is really being essentially reconstructed, staff would encourage discussion of ways to redesign the element to lessen its impacts. The new roof that is proposed to cover a portion of the deck will be taller than the staircase and will be very noticeable from the street. It is incompatible with the character and design of the historic building and would detract from it in the fact that it will affect the profile of the building and does not use roof forms or materials that are related to the historic structure. Staff recommends that this element be deleted from the project. It appears that some of the items proposed in this plan will not be visible from the street. Additional deck area, seating, the hot tub, grill, and planter boxes are generally not objectionable, however, their visibility at the northwest corner of the building, as mentioned above, must be explored further. Staff does have concerns with allowing trees, rather than flowers or low shrubs, in the box planters. 2 .. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The issue of rooftop development in the downtown has come up several times at HPC recently. While there are many positive effects of increasing activity in the downtown, the HPC is concerned with visibility from the street, and to a lesser extent, visibility from surrounding buildings and from the mountain. The character of the neighborhood would be affected by any rooftop development that detracted from some of the important features of the 19th century structures, such as strong, decorative cornices and flat roofs. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The Brand Building, historically known as the Hyman Block, was built for David H. Hyman, an early promoter of Aspen. It is a two story Peachblow sandstone structure, completed in 1891 at a cost of $30,000, and became the home of the First National Bank. The second floor was a large hall, which housed the Patriotic Order Sons of America (P.O.S.A.), a lodge dedicated to "society purposes and social gatherings." From the 1920's into the 1960's, the first floor of the building was occupied by gas stations, auto dealers, and auto repair shops. By 1971, the building had fallen into disrepair and was close to being condemned. The current owner purchased the building and began making repairs, and artists such as Roy Lichtenstein, Andy Warhol, and James Rosenquist used the upper floor for studios. The proposal does not involve alterations that would detract from the history of the structure. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Staff feels that some of the alterations will diminish the architectural integrity of the building, as discussed under the first review standard. The applicant should do "mock-ups" of the proposed development at the northwest corner of the building and for the staircase expansion. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3 .. ..... â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that the HPC continue the application with the following direction: 1. All improvements will be held back a full three feet from the north building wall. 2. The applicant must mock-up the proposed railing at the northwest corner of the building and the expansion of the existing stair enclosure for HPC to review. 3. If the stair enclosure is to be expanded, the applicant and HPC should discuss ways to improve its relationship to the historic structure. 4. The railing along the north wall must be open so that snow is not trapped against the parapet. 5. Nothing but flowers and low shrubs may be planted in the box planters. Trees are not permitted. 6. No furnishings on the roof may be taller than 6 feet. 7. The roof over the deck is not appropriate. 8. HPC staff and monitor will need to approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. Exhibits: A. Staff memo dated October 11,2000. B. Application. 4 \J< 4 0 0 f 0,4 4, I s . . t. 1 .. RESOLUTION NO. , (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO EXPAND AN EXISTING ROOF DECK FOR THE BRAND BUILDING LOCATED AT 203 SOUTH GALENA STREET, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2737-073-46-011 WHEREAS, the applicant, Richard Wall, represented by Stryker / Brown Architects requests minor HPC approval for exterior expansion of the roof deck of the Brand Building Condominiums, Block 88, located at 203 South Galena Street, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, is a local landmark, and is within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a property listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adj acent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and . .. WHEREAS, Staff initially performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended to continue the application from its original public hearing date of October 11, 2000 until November 8*,2000 in order to request the applicant to create "mock-ups" of the proposed development to be reviewed by the HPC during a site visit; WHEREAS, Staff performed a second analysis of the application subsequent to the site visit to review the mock-ups of the proposed roof top deck development and found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on November 8, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application did not meet the standards, and did not approve the application with conditions by a vote of three to three (3 - 3). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Minor Development for the expansion of the existing roof deck of the Brand Building located 203 South Galena Street, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the November 8,2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant agree that all improvements will be held back a full three feet from the north building wall; 2. That if the applicant wishes to expand the staircase enclosure, the applicant shall provide the HPC monitor with final drawings for review as to its relationship to the historic structure, prior to the application of building permits; 3. That the applicant agree to construct the railing along the north wall to be open so that snow is not trapped against the parapet; 4. That the applicant agrees to plant nothing but flowers and low shrubs in box planters. Trees shall not be permitted; 5. That the applicant agree that no furnishings on the roof shall be taller than six feet in height from the roof surface; 6. That the applicant agrees that no roofing shall be constructed over any part of the decking on the roof; 7. That the HPC Staff and monitor will need to approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; and 8. That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. .. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the Sth day of November, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. RESOLUTION NO. , (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO EXPAND AN EXISTING ROOF DECK FOR THE BRAND BUILDING LOCATED AT 203 SOUTH GALENA STREET, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2737-073-46-011 WHEREAS, the applicant, Richard Wall, represented by Stryker / Brown Architects requests minor HPC approval for exterior expansion of the roof deck of the Brand Building Condominiums, Block 88, located at 203 South Galena Street, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, is a local landmark, and is within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a property listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and .. WHEREAS, Staff initially performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended to continue the application from its original public hearing date of October 11, 2000 until November gth, 2000 in order to request the applicant to create "mock-ups" of the proposed development to be reviewed by the HPC during a site visit; WHEREAS, Staff performed a second analysis of the application subsequent to the site visit to review the mock-ups of the proposed roof top deck development and found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on November 8, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a unanimous vote of six to zero (6 - 0). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Minor Development for the expansion of the existing roof deck of the Brand Building located 203 South Galena Street, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the November 8,2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant agree that all improvements will be held back a full three feet from the north building wall; 2. That the applicant shall return to the HPC for further review of the exterior materials and size of the north and west handrails prior to the application of a building permit and that the applicant agrees that there shall be no expansion of the stair bulkhead as part of this application; 3. That the applicant agree to construct the railing along the north wall to be open so that snow is not trapped against the parapet; 4. That the applicant agrees to plant nothing but flowers and low shrubs in box planters. Trees shall not be permitted; 5. That the applicant agree that no furnishings on the roof shall be taller than six feet in height from the roof surface; 6. That the applicant agrees that no roofing shall be constructed over any part of the decking on the roof; 7. That the HPC Staff and monitor will need to approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; and 8. That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and A . .. considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions; and APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 8th day of November, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. â€¢ 6 RESOLUTION NO. -, (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT TO EXPAND AN EXISTING ROOF DECK FOR THE BRAND BUILDING LOCATED AT 203 SOUTH GALENA STREET, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID# 2737-073-46-011 WHEREAS, the applicant, Richard Wall, represented by Stryker / Brown Architects requests minor HPC approval for exterior expansion of the roof deck of the Brand Building Condominiums, Block 88, located at 203 South Galena Street, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, is a local landmark, and is within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a property listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures" must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.B.4 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adj acent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and .. 4. WHEREAS, Staff initially performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended to continue the application from its original public hearing date of October 11, 2000 until November 8th, 2000 in order to request the applicant to create "mock-ups" of the proposed development to be reviewed by the HPC during a site visit; WHEREAS, Staff performed a second analysis of the application subsequent to the site visit to review the mock-ups of the proposed roo f top deck development and found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on November 8, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the ~ JijJJJ standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of g to .S u.60 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: .-* That the Minor Development for the expansion of the existing roof deck of the Brand Building located 203 South Galena Street, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the November 8,2000 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1 t. ~, That the applicant agree that all improvements will be held back a full three feet from the north building wall; < 2. That ifthe applicant wishes to expandrthe-Sircase enclosure, the applicant shall w-x provide the HPC mon~flwith final drawings for review as to its relationship to the historic structurg)rior to the application of a building permit; '~ ~ That the applicant agree to construct the railing along the north wall to be open so that snow is not trapped against the parapet; That the applicant agrees to plant nothing but flowers and low shrubs in box planters. Trees shall not be permitted; ./~ Q) That the applicant agree that no furnishings on the roof shall be taller than six feet in height from the roof surface; L/~ (j) That the applicant agrees that no roofing shall be constructed over any part of the decking on the roof; 1,/~ '(33 That the HPC Staff and monitor will need to approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; and t/"~~ That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and l lit" J-~t ~4 Jkl 4 pit <v 642-4 4 W. AVIP l.00.4b 4/ 1-1 l ~ + #T w., P bALL,4 4/ ~'tt41 No {Alâ€¢ 42-7 4 -AW- 1 .. considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions; and APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 8th day of November, 2000. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk .. . Recommended Motion: "I move to adopt Resolution # , Series of 2000, approving a Minor Development for an exterior expansion ofthe roof deck of the Brand Building Condominiums, Block 88, located at 203 South Galena Street, City and Townsite of Aspen with the conditions set forth and stated herein." ' 0 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Application Package Contents Following is an application for minor development review at HPC. Included in this package are: 1. Attachment 1- Application form v 2. Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form A. Attachment 3- Description of general requirements for a complete development application . 4. Attachment 4- Description of specific requirements for a complete development application to HPC /8. Attachment 5- Applicable review standards on which HPC will base its / decision 46. Attachment 6- General summary of the HPC review process v7. Attachment 7- Definition of minor development i , Nolbs> 1019%-ft ge-FT 1-7 ME*5:TINOT '983-Fl- 46 11?f*Pr v/4, Â«-6 +463 014521:1 To submit a complete application, fill out Attachments 1 and 2, include all items listed on Attachments 3 and 4, and provide any other information necessary to clarify the project. A pre-application conference is strongly recommended so that the appropriate review process and submission requirements can be discussed. In addition, other reviews, such as those before the Planning and Zoning Commission, which may be required by the Aspen Municipal Code can be identified at this time. A consultation with the Zoning Officer and Building Department is also recommended early in the application process. TWO COPIES OF ALL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS IN A FORMAT NO LARGER THAN 11"X17" ARE REQUIRED. FOR GRAPHICS WHICH ARE LARGER THAN 11"X17," SUBMIT TWELVE SETS OF PRINTS. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1 Project name FkHABp WA- 142'Fe 822>14 2. Project location 18~+117 Fe , 1414 1-r 15 Wrfâ‚¬ 4 + EL Â¢ 3: ril-2~, 9,4hl 4 11,6 *05'Â·Â¢F*H (indicate street address, lot And block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 66 4. Lot size 9,024 5-F 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number R'40â€¢1'P W,13/ 9019 1PffFÂ»10 FIAÂ¥, eA*Pf |+1 LEr, 46 9 0 70* 089 j 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 9~ 0%- 2,1,0 41'cY" IL- 1212'WN 1 IlÂ»IÂ¥ , I !9 e, sriNN#r , /â‚¬ fer# 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD X Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexVMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) tix '4111461 al-10 BEÂ¢"-0 M UNIT, 1.0â€¢::ft 0Â·H P Faa F Folf 9. Description of development applitation g)<4 ~Â¢00~ 1-14, ~Â·~r 20~71<. 1410'OP.1- 10.jiave you completed and attached the following? 1/ Attachment 1- Land use application form RECEIVED V' Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form â€¢00- Response to Attachment 3 AUG 2 5 2000 P"00' Response to Attachment 4 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: PMP IA|~U- Address: *04 50 +46*0- Zone district: 66 Lot size: 9,0 00 GF Existing FAR: Il, 071 â‚¬F Allowable FAR: 13, 0397 Proposed FAR: I 1, â€¢79 gr Existing net leasable (commetcial): HIP- Proposed net leasable (commercial): H /k Existing % of site coverage: Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: IVA Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 0%2' Accesory bldg: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 40Â£' I Accessory bldg: Proposed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: / WFT Proposed number of bedrooms: Existing on-site parking spaces: On-site parking spaces required: % r Setbacks - Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 110~.9 Front: 14#HIE Front: Rear: -30\4&- Rear: 14# 14 0 Rear: Combined Combined Combined Front/rear: 14#11% Fronvrear: H+46 Front/rear: Side: Side: Side: Side: ~~~ Side: ~~ Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: H#*16 Sides: MONÂ£ Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: m:xleÂ·rl Ha gil 1.~AB /8 EP- '41 P A.'Al IN I Hil FrIOF#*1E1#-19 Variations requested: 1"16. (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PI 1KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . stryker brown ARCHITECTS Meeting Notes: TO: Wayne Stryker FROM: Steven Buettow DATE: AUGUST. 14.2000 RE: Brand Building FAR Brand Building 205 S. Galena Street SW corner of Galena & Hopkins Lots G,H & 1, Block 88, City of Aspen Three Story Building Existing Floor Area Ratio 1 st Floor= 8,695.6 SF 2nd Floor= 6,998.1 SF 3rd Floor= 3,385.93 SF Total= 19,079.63 SF Zone= CC Existing Lots= 9,026 SF allowable Far= 1.5 to 1= 13,539 SF allowable Deck SF= 2,030.85 SF existing Deck SF= 1,495.7SF existing unit 13 Deck= 619.75 SF Proposed Unit 13 Deck= 1,112.26 SF Proposed Total Deck SF= 1998.21 SF RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. ATTACHMENT 3 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All development applications must include the following information: 01. The applicant's name, address, and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. /~. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. rl. / Â®3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the development review. 0' 4. An 81/2" x11"vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. I RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Sent By: Richard A. Wall & Associates; 310 288 0849; Aug-25-00 8:53AM; Page : Ilic.ar. i Wall 905 N Hartford Way - Beverly Hilk California 90210 - U. S.A Phone (310) 288 0891 - Fax (310) 288 0849 - Email RW90210*801.com Cellular (619)723 492y (310) 801 0922 August 25,2000 TO: Aspen community Development FROM: Richard A. Wall RE. 205 S. Galena Street, Unit #11, Aspen, Colorado Via Facialmile: c/o Stryker Brown Architects - 970 925 2100 To whom it may concern: Pursuant to the application to HPC Minor Development Review 1 submit the following information, viz: Applicant Pacific Equities, Ltd., a Nevada Corporation. Pacific Equities is a wholly owned corporation of Richard A. Wall, President and Secretary. Addrzst: 7538 Caminito Avola, La Jolla, California 92037 (Residence owned by Richard A. Wall Telephone: 310 288 0891/310 801 0922 Disclosure_offhamm*12: By Attachment I herÂ©by cot,firm that all of the above information is current and correct. Thank you for your cooperation and courtevies in this matter, ! remain. Sincerely yours, ,} 1,/--nl \J L T (MÂ»AAA~ Richard A. Wall RAW/mr RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / Fi f KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Sent By: Richard A. Wall & Assoclates; 310 288 0849; Aug-25-00 8:52AM; Pag -. '00 08/24 THU 10:55 FAX August 24.2000 Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena St. Aspen. Colorado Re: Richard Wall HPC Minor Development Review To whom it may concern: 1 hereby authorize Stryker 8rown Architects to act as my designated and authorized representative with respect to the land use application being submitted to your office for our properly located at 206 S. Gatena St, Aspen, Colorado. Stryker Brown Architects is authorized to submit an application for an HPC Minor Development Review on our property. They, or their assigns. are authorized to represent us In meetings with City staff, boards, commissions and City Council. Should you have any need to contact me during the course of your review, please do so through Stryker Brown Architects, whose address and telephone numbers are provided in the application. Sincerely, /h . l Richard Wall RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PI-IKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Sent By: J.L. Dezigns; 310 275 2695; Aug - 2g,i,2 0 9:11 AM; Page 1/2 COMMITMENT .. SamUL A Sardye Wtlitalver Coates/Beid/Waldron 720 East Hynan Aspen, 00 81611 1. Effective Date: March 14, 2000 at 7:00 AM ader No. 406472 -â‚¬ }44/mv a-tigi,1 *fÂ«.290 amÂ»Pul 2. AL:[R Owner' s folicy Aaount: 8 675,000.00 Proposed Iâ„¢ured: PACIFIC EQUITIES, UID. NEVADA CORPORATION 3. ALTA Lom Pblicies .amt: S Propo-d Ir-red: Propoeed Inaired: Moint: $ 4. 1118 estate or inteE-t in the land de,cribed or refeIred to in this Co-it=Ent and cot,ered herâ€¢in i : FEE SIr'PIE and title thereto is at the effective dite h-eof ve,ted in: ARTEÂ»IE DOYLE RIEREÂ»:AN iseued by: Owner' s Premium: S 944.00 ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION Lender's Premium: $ 600 EAST KIXI~ AVENE #305 Add' 1 Iender ag: $ ASPe, m 81611 Add'l Charges: S FAX 970-920-4052 Te* Certificate: S 10Â·00 PH 970-920-4050 DENVER 303-595-8463 Efih:genient Og: S TeD aurges: 8 RECEIVED 'lurAL amaGES: $ 954.00 AUG 2 5 2000 FIEr AM9â‚¬ICAN TITLE INSLRANCE COMPANY ASPEN / PIt KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Sent Ay: J.L. Dezigns; 310 275 2695; Aug-25-00 9:11 AM; Page 2/2 . COMMITMENT Plat id No' SOmug A (Ocirtinzid) Or,1- No. 406472 -C 5. The land referred to in the 0,-itient i, coveriqg the 1-d in the State of Oolc,=ado. Canty of Pitkin , Moarihed aâ€¢ folioe/: Unit 13, BRAN) MILDIE, acoording to U., Ma,) thareof filed August 6, 1990, in Plat mok 24 at Page 53 and aoo=ding to the Cordaminiun Declaration reaoraga August 6, 1990, in Book 626 at Page 628. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE I~anANCE COMrANY ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . - - C / li Iiz i 1 P .---\ \ 6 6--l S/4Â», 0 <~ ~--~ --- -Â· ~T--l.9 7 6,>. I. ------ : -9.-PO 1 '70 > h ,~\, e ./ . #71- _-- tfgkLJfler'Opt e{:74Â«>44 ~-~--- --- 1 3.4 62,/04 3x %/17 + d %9 .1 eo 1/7~~3% //~d ~< 1 \\ \U.--------,9 ~ J /9\ 4.4~/ ls/B:,B unny Ct UÂ»'69 3. 4/ U> 1 s,eY?/iX 1.,1 4.=---- -- - - c,r 1 Â», 24\ ,N 5Â«Â·-2-4 .*&,Ttr> l) -n-X % 43 4. Aseen \*46 , ~ 4-/ l___~~~~~~_"/pev \<4 ); - Hunfer 61 , |AS,itile Ib at in 2 \ 11 ./1 / F 0 1 \: J 0 1.1/SK .9- . g r'M b lent Wood Duck l.n \42 & Gmes ie Sf , 11/ t q pe n C, 0-1 - 0- liti 12 \1 -95-43-7---(4 0* t : : . Golf Course .M--4 ../9-1-4 4 4 vIne St 4\ , I., ' %11 2/ . 44 F~ncts St P . e 0/ , 4 - 0% 7 Co . \ 1 0- 0/ 4/ 2 0 1 Â®9 3 Race 1 4 4 4 ~ 1 9 - 667 1 4 M oon Cirek Ad 3 \ 4 'hs, 8/ Â· =Sh â€¢ * st Â·%Â©- 1 S out Av 8,4 Ck ! c:0 i=\3 - a//7 S/ Pk '*> j rane' 4:'>05/+ j h. 0\ f -1 4 2.1, 4.05 1>k 52 * g '~,~~#,7& 9*444 k~ T -? r--11 --3 1Â·2 I rt , 3 ' - 2 1 8...20 \ 0 \ 2/ C / C g; c HOSP \% , r ;, )/ <1/ 2. ~ 61/ / 4,44 41 ' 13 1 21 31 ./ Ap 1 4 4 '5 11 /0, ./ L ~~ Acf T 0,4 4 le . Â¢ 07 i \ 4.6 st 442 **VUM#*4652 Â¢ 2 E C L -'.-- W 0 4 455 2 C, S 3 1 :41 â‚¬00 00/5 - -1.2/ 4 4 9 r k Q Mati C 3 le Â¢ S 10 -e 40 I v Dale â€¢ 2 ' larkspurt' 4 St b GIl r O 0 p J 5 (el / e 0.0. , ' 8 ~~~~ 'sq Summa St -~ Â·Â· ~1.~ 0 4 rey 0 - - 8 Â§ 6 4- 1 '4,6"AP ~ w ,â‚¬ro #' A8 n Grove R /PS M WestÂ·,lew I Â· 41 1 .Â· 1-44 CO-i- ..1 Ute Fl Ce.... > iâ‚¬3'44 .6.Ad 4 . Mi'/4_1 Â¢6 349 94 1 92 \. >- 0~bj VICINITY IVIAP "brâ€¢ }S @OrtidS - ~ 1N3nd013A30 ALINAMINOO Nl>!lld / N3dSV a3AI303kl 95 L .uzLE-/--- 0002 9 2 onv 33 .. ATTACHMENT 4 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW All applications for minor development review must include the following information: v/k- 1. If determined appropriate by the Community Development Director, a site plan or survey showing property boundaries and predominant existing site characteristics. v 2. An accurate representation of all major building materials, such as samples ~. and photographs, to be used for the proposed development. 03. A scale drawing of the proposed development in relation to any existing structure. Â«4. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application, including a statement of the effect of the proposed development on the original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. ARCHITECTS Meeting Notes: TO: HPC FROM: Steven Buettow DATE: August.24.2000 RE: Project Description, attachment 4 This existing unit is #13 in the Brand Condominiums, 205 S. Galena. We are proposing to remodel the existing Roof Deck. The current Deck is 619.75 SF. It is a raised wooden platform with metal sitting chairs and has an existing gas grill. We are proposing to expand the Deck to 1,112.26 SF with additional wooden platforms. They will be 2x6 redwood decking over 2x 6 redwood joist. Since the roof slopes from East to West and the top of roof elevation varies, we are proposing two platform elevations stepping down 7" in similar relation to the roof. From the existing stair tower we are proposing to build a covered porch of approximately 175 SF. This new porch element will comply with the porch definition in the Land Use Code. It will also be under the 40' height limitation. There will be no FAR increase. Two new planter boxes will be built to surround the deck with green vegetation. Hanging plant boxes will be installed on the North side from the new 42" solid rail. A Hot tub will be placed on the West side of the lower platform. We are proposing to keep the existing gas grill and install a sink cabinet adjacent to it. Overall, we have kept a 3'-0" space between the new deck and the existing 3'-0" building North parapet wall. And we placed the covered porch toward the middle of the deck away from the buildings North side and a possible street vision. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 119 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970.925.2100 925.2258 (FAX) .. ATTACHMENT 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the HPC finds that all of the following standards are met: 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to 500 sq.ft. or the allowed site coverage by up to 5%, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.040.090 (B)(2). 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. "HISTORIC DISTRICT AND HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGN GUIDELINES" HAVE BEEN ADOPTED BY THE CITY AND ARE AVAILABLE AS A FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE INTENT OF HPC AND GENERAL PRINCIPALS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION. ALL APPLICANTS SHOULD CONSULT THIS RESOURCE, COPIES OF WHICH ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT stryker brown ARCHITECTS Meeting Notes: TO: HPC FROM: Steven Buettow DATE: August.24.2000 RE: attachment 5 1. This proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel because there are numerous other developed Roof Decks on this building. Units 12,14 & 15 have them in addition to the existing one that we are remodeling. 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the charactor of the neighborhood of the proposed parcel. The new Isis remodel, Aspen Drugstore and Independence Square buildings have roof terrace development and one story elements surrounding them. Covered Roof elements are seen in town. 3. The proposed development enhances the historical significance of the designated historic structures located on this parcel because it will not relate to the basic historic building form. The majority of the changes will be hidden by the existing parapet wall. The remainder are set well back from the building face and if seen at all will be a similar cedar shingles look appropriate to its time. 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural charactor and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. This proposal is 85% hidden by the existing parapet wall and will never be seen. The covered porch element improves the existing stair tower silhouette and adds a wood and shingle element to the existing glass and metal stair structure. New green vegetation will humanize and greatly improve the present bare roof top appearance of rubber membrane,wood packing crates, metal roof top ventilator units, skylights and exposed silver ducts. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 119 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970.925.2100 925.2258 (FAX) ATTACHMENT 6 GENERAL SUMMARY OF ONE STEP HPC APPLICATION PROCESS 1. The following are the types of development applications which are processed in one step by the HPC: 4 Minor development review â€¢ Partial demolition â€¢ On-site or temporary relocation C il C..>/4, 0 2. Development review procedure summary. The one step HPC review procedure is as follows: i (1Â·~h. * 9 ,/1 10/ Attend a pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with the historic preservation planner is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the 1 k }6' materials staff will need to review your application. ff â€¢ Submit development application. Based on your pre-application conference, respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies, and fee if applicable, to the Community *480 01 Development Department. â€¢ Determination of completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by Staff to determine if all required information has been included. You will be notified in writing when additional materials are necessary. â€¢ Complete notice requirements. â€¢ Review of development application. Once the application is determined to be complete, the item will be scheduled on the soonest HPC agenda available. The submission due date is a minimum of nine days prior to the HPC meeting date to allow for staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner's task to review the application with respect to it's compliance with land use regulations and to write a memo to the Historic Preservation Commission. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, approval with conditions, tabling, or denial of the application. The memo is normally available at the end of the week prior to the HPC meeting. The planner will call the applicant or representative when the memo is ready and can also provide th ligetiVED agenda time for the item. AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / Pll-KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. 3. At the meeting, staff will make a brief presentation of the case and then the Chair will ask the applicant or representative to make a presentation or to clarify any aspects of the project. HPC members will comment on the proposal and then vote on an action. 4. Receipt of building permit. Once the approval of HPC has been received, a building permit application may be submitted. At this time the proposal will be reviewed for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and zoning regulations. Fees for water, sewer, park dedication fees, and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document, such as a plat, deed restriction, or other agreement which is required to be filed, must be recorded before the building permit will be issued. 5. HPC assigns a member of the Commission to be the "project monitor" for each project. The monitor (and Staff) may periodically visit the site as work is under construction. If any aspects of the project change after the HPC approval, the applicant, Staff, and the project monitor will attempt to address them without returning to HPC. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / Pll KiN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. ATTACHMENT 7 DEFINITION OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT Minor development shall be defined as follows: â€¢ Remodeling of a structure where alterations are made to no more than one element of the structure, including but not limited to a roof, window, door, skylight, ornamental trim, siding, kickplate, dormer, porch, staircase, and balcony; â€¢ Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase in floor area of the structure is two hundred fifty (250) square feet or less; or â€¢ Erection or remodeling of combinations of, or multiples of no more than three (3) of the following features: awnings, canopies, signs, fences, and other similar attachments; or windows, doors, skylights, and dormers. Erection of more that three (3) of the above listed features may be defined as minor if there is a finding that the cumulative impact on such development is minor in its effect on the character of the existing structures. â€¢ Erection of street furniture, signs, benches, public art, or similar development which is to be placed throughout the Commercial Core or Main Street Historic Districts. The community development director may determine that the development is to be reviewed as a significant development, pursuant to Section 26.72.010(F). Public hearing requirements will not apply. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PA KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. ATTACHMENT 8 PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS Minor development review requires notice by posting of the property. Following is a description of the notice requirements. Posting. Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done 10 days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development Department, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof (preferably a photograph) to the hearing to show that the posting took place. PLEASE NOTE THAT A PUBLIC HEARING CANNOT BE HELD WITHOUT PROOF OF NOTICE ON AN AFFADAVIT FORM PROVIDED BY THE CITY, PRESENTED AT THE MEETING. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / Pll-KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060(E) I, , being or representing an Applicant to the City ofAspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing ofnotice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the day of , 200__ (which is days prior to the public hearing date of 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the day of , 200_, to the day of , 200 . (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph ofthe posted sign is attached hereto. Signature (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this day of , 200_. by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expires: RECEIVED Notary Public AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Â¢#4 Â¥* 69.0 w ALAA TeÂ¢& (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOW~: ' 1 Af~; m~4~*ICA~holiEC~ted to~1~@~i~cati~o~~~~~~~~~. ,.,vrr i,~; (hereinafter, THE PROJECR).- 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior ho a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ Â¥80 - which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs~exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT 42.../,- WAYNE By: Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Date: All Â· 24 '9000 Mailing Address: /14 4. 01,12'A'4 91.0 "fg,W i CO. 91 (01) RECEIVED g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 12/27/99 AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ... ~ brown '4*f.. I V. 119 S. SPRING ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 . .1 >Â· 9 970.925.2100 + ./. I - I FAX: 925.2258 1 4 4 strykerbrown.com I . . . .. ...~I A 41 . 4:, . .. 9. â€žal .A I- 1.9. >... 44. 11. .Â»it -4. 4-11 1 ..1.- - 41,11 lilli .1 1.1-1 1 . 0,1,'; 1." 4 n''I' ' . 1 1 1 4 ./ ' 1 - 4 1 Richard Wall Roof Deck in the Northeast from City Hall Northeast from Main Street Brand Building Unit 13, Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 - .1. Townsite of Aspen . 0.,4:26.. 3-1-212?S':6"CAH.t. A ' Pitkin County, Colo, 205 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO *p. ':-+ : 21;LWS(.':-:irs- ' Ze'll, .. -.4 -fF li,. -1 1 - t ;i- : .. - . DATE: ISSUE: .... rm.:i i ,'.~,4.)-,1 A AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN . 1 81 A :y . 4-/ * , g ./1 . re Â·- 11' 1 1 I' . firk . ~ 1 2 1.-' ili & r k 1 1 /WE.4##1~~/~/B#Vi 44i#'~,Y-**, ,~ ~0 Crl - VAi . 4'1* â€¢ 4. 1 1 . - 4/.- - 11*-....1 .1 '111 11 1, 11 1 1% 1 1 1,1 - PHOTOS RECEIVED Southeast from Hyman Southeast from Elks Building AUG 2 5 2000 A 0.1 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~X .... ~ blown 119 S. SPRING ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com EXISTING PARAPET WALL / / FLOWER BOXES ~' / MOUNTED ON RAIL / / ~ 0. NEW 42" SOLID RAIL It \ / 7/ \ - ------------~ GRILL SUNEET E-l - - El OPEN WOOD DECK 01 VIEW NG - ---------lul- - --..! 1 NEW 42" 1 SOLID RAIL ~ TREE i TO ROOF SITTING i 0 EXISTING STAIRS 4==- 1-g-- AFIEAI- i ~~_ ~ COVEREd [FECI#1 1 1 WOOD F - ENTERTAÂ»,EI~ '-1 Richard Wall DECK 1 ARFA 94--- Roof Deck / 710 --009) ( HOT ' -- EXPAND EXISTING 1 STRUCTURE FOR < TUB 1 3 0 LARGER STAIR in the / STEP L__________-_-___-1 <---- -~./ DOWN DIAMETER , Brand Building OPEN WOOD DECK BENCH ENTERTAINMENT . 7 TREE - -- - AREA ~ .,,Â·- Unit 13, Lots G,H & I, Block 88 Townsite of Aspen Pitkin County, Colo. ,, NEW 42" SOLID RAIL ~~--- 205 S. Galena Street - BOX PLANTER Aspen, CO EXISTING SKYLIGH TREE ~ TO HALLWAY BELCW Y EXISTING ROOF 14 SLOPE DATE: ISSUE: < --- AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN ---- EXISTING PRIVATE SKYLIGHT- TYPICAL ,- VA VA ' ' /A /~ VA : V' 1' 7% -va- * Q PLANS RECEIVED 1/8" = 10-0 SCALE Roof Deck Plan AUG 2 5 2000 A 2.1 ASPEN / Pl IKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ... ~yker brown 119 S. SPRING ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com r> // q .. b , B , 4 Richard Wall It,--/ -44$, Roof Deck p<931[7 9.4461,/. li li 1 i / Ii...2-13>,2 439 + .6. . 9 //,.%-.. \ 14/ .. /0/ in the Brand Building > I /21\\ / CN k - Unit 13, Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 r.- . 93----9 i / Townsite of Aspen Pitkin County, Colo. \44\ D //00. Aspen, CO 205 S. Galena Street \44\ i- / / A T \\ i /* \443 44\ . 1/ 1 / li 1 l // AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN DATEÂ· ISSUEÂ· \41\ ill\ // ISOMETRIC SOUTHWEST ISOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE RECEIVED PERSPECTIVES AUG 2 5 2000 A 3.1 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0 0 Istryker brown .,-Â· NEW ROOF .......Â·--+Â·31~' WOOD SIÂ·IINGL.E ROOFING --=-<-. WATER PROOFING 5.8' PLYWOOD 119 S. SPRING ST. 2 X 6'S 0 16' 00 . ASPEN, CO 81611 EXPOSED JOISI T ROOF RIDGE 970.925.2100 111.-9 FAX: 925.2258 t I.ROOF RIDGE strykerbrown.com 4110'-1 4 _-----.-Â·Â·- EXISIINGSIAInlOWEH ~ T. ROOF BEAAING -'' " 108'-1. -- CONNECTIONS TO JOIST _ _-_ _ _ -- _. - 4X, WOOD COLUMNS . =---= WITH EXPOSED METAL AND DECKING t/- t-- - d =- NEW HOT TUB ,/",, NEW PLANTER BOX k~ 727-, ~ NEW 42' SOLID RAIL C % T. UPPER PLATFORM= 100'-7Â· Â¢''-- ''U'''I____ NEW r DEEP FLOOR: 6. T LOWEA PLATFORM= 100'4 OVER 2 X6 REDWOOD JOIST- 4 2XBREDWOOD DECKING 6 PLACE OVER EXISTING ROOF: RUBBER MEMBRANE T. EXISTING ROOF= VARIES WATERPROOFING- EXISTING SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS ROOF ELEVATION VARIES CROSS SECTION B/ A4.1 1/8' = 1'-0" SCALE Richard Wall - NEW ROOF _...--5-/ WOOD SHINGLE ROOFING Roof Deck WATER PROOFING / 5/8" PLYWOOD 2 X 6'S @ 16' OC in the EXPOSED JOIST T. ROOF RIDGE Brand Building Â· '' Â·Â· 0 7951' 2 1119 -- 8/12 ROOF ' i- T. ROOF RIDGE Unit 13, 1/3 POINT 2/Â«Â«72 Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 110'-1" b Townsite of Aspen , . Pitkin County, Colo. T. ROOF BEARING 205 S. Galena Street NOTE: \â‚¬5= 0/ /\ Â»> (-3 Aspen, CO 4 X 4 WOOD COLUMNS 108'-1" 7911.7' SIDEWALK - __~___--_----- - -WITH EXPOSED METAL ELEVATION PLUS AND DECKING --- CONNECTIONS TO JOIST 40' BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT= 7951.7' 4 - .-- NEW 42' SOLID RAIL - -, NEW GRILL h DATE: ISSUE: - E-- PO /,L AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1-t- 3- - - 1 --- AREA NOT DISTURBED 7942' /L T. UPPER PLATFORM= 100'-70 .--- EXISTING BUILDING PARAPET WALL TOP OF ROOF -- '111NN. 11 Illilljll!1-1ll Illillillilillitlillilll/Ilillillfillillillidlililll 1%{41.1jili_llliN NANII!i, 1 0 AT STAIR ----Â° = ' 1 0 k T. EXISTING ROOF= VARIES 21 SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS - NEW 7' DEEP FLOOR: 2 X 6 REDWOOD DECKING OVER 2X6 REDWOOD JOIST- PLACE OVER EXISTING ROOF 7911.7' RUBBER MEMBRANE RECEIVED CROSS WATERPROOFING- EXISTING SIDEWALK ROOF ELEVATION VARIES SECTIONS ELEVATION WALL SECTION B/ A5.1 AUG 2 5 2000 1/4* = 1'-0' SCALE ASPEN / PI[KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A 4.1 .9-,L 9'-0" t. 0 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLL 9Â¥'1 Â¥* 1Â»OW w /*lA *trk Afc; m~.~ice*,t}Iiib~tted to~T~pp~cat~~~0 4,â€¢M,â€¢tâ€¢,m (,Jv(~ 4~t; (heremafter, THE PROJECt).- 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT' S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior_ ,%,a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ ~ ~ / f_ whichisfor hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costsFexceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: ~2//#17474% 4TAN KE.N. Julie Ann Woods & 4.24.9,900 Community Development Director Date: Mailing Address: /14 4. 4212/All er. '*f W I CO. 91 (IMCEIVED g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc AUG 2 5 2000 12/27/99 ASPEN / Pl[KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1 Project name f~1014+BP 144-4 14=Fe Rel>IC 2. Project location rBEH IP Al-Â·Afr , W H 1 -T" 1 5 1,fs 40 0 0% 1,14â€¢- S.# , 14.1,14 prg- Â¢090'F*H (indicate street address, lot 6nd block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 66 4. Lot size 9,014 5-Fi 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 121*m W41/ 90 e 1Pic'-FÂ»P Pr, ela/Ef-pr H-1 LEÂ© 4'Â· 3 0 1*0~ 059 1 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 9~ 01- 2,100 4'TICâ„¢B IL- 1912'kIN blecH I-IÂ»râ‚¬, I ll G. SrN!49 c /â‚¬ feH 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD _X Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 6% 1411144 "190 +B'96-M UNIT, 1,Â·orr +H P F-F PK,sk. 9. Description of development applidation E)<, 19TI1-14 P#Wr 9le21<0 14*lopâ€¢t- 10.,Wave you completed and attached the following? 1/ Attachment 1- Land use application form RECEIVED 1/0' Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 4- Response to Attachment 3 AUG 2 5 2000 d/-- Response to Attachment 4 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E-lt (9 j \- E> ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Bâ€¢W,â€ž 1 0%1- Address: *04 5. 4,&Â£6*0- Zone district: .6 Lot size: 9,0:G GF Existing FAR: 141 071 9, Allowable FAR: 13, *39Â« Proposed FAR: I li â€¢ 71 GF Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Mit: Existing % of site coverage: Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: 19/* Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: *e' Accesory bldg: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 40' Accessory bldg: Proposed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: Proposed number of bedrooms: 2~4|~ Existing on-site parking spaces: 0 p On-site parking spaces required: 14#11* Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 4f~ Front: 14Â»115 Front: Rear: -1-lupwl Rear: No 14 6 Rear: Combined Combined Combined Front/rear: 14#110~ Front/rear: ~0146 FronVrear: Side: Side: Side: Side: ~~ Side: 7~-*P~ Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: VIâ€¢~10 Sides: 11#HE Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Bxler-IH# 4'i 14tz~9:/FIE,-- '6+112 4! 41 '161 Frl*'Â«M 8141* variations requested: 140HIE; (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT stryker brown ~ ARCHITECTS Meeting Notes: TO: Wayne Stryker FROM: Steven Buettow DATE: AUGUST. 14.2000 RE: Brand Building FAR Brand Building 205 S. Galena Street SW corner of Galena & Hopkins Lots G,H & 1, Block 88, City of Aspen Three Story Building Existing Floor Area Ratio 1 st Floor= 8,695.6 SF 2nd Floor= 6,998.1 SF 3rd Floor= 3,385.93 SF Total= 19,079.63 SF Zone= CC Existing Lots= 9,026 SF allowable Far= 1.5 to 1= 13,539 SF allowable Deck SF= 2,030.85 SF existing Deck SF= 1,495.7SF existing unit 13 Deck= 619.75 SF Proposed Unit 13 Deck= 1,112.26 SF Proposed Total Deck SF= 1998.21 SF RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L t CHO , / '6 <:.6, \\ t.\ P f Â», Â» 1->\ 4.-.44*.-* T--1 1 - n \\ NX\32 i Ap/:u ./ .'\ /V/9/17Â»0Â«1\\ 44 3 4 144 / 0 / 4 24 â‚¬4'04 0,Â·iu.Â·C-'1 6 -~ 324'b -~\ 9% 0 9,4.0 - . 6~' 76Â· ~e ~ -78/ .//., 12\ 1\\\3 \ 0 o 12Pe#age ./0 44~/ Â·~s/-6rvfunny CK /4 .Â·â€¢irlil Sierra ,- \/ 4... N 0 \ %. I N Ot: 2# i L/7 AN Salv#'EC~Y11 \ hs. I. 1 /4 quser 'r~ Aspen Â»<3 jE \AT L__-_/9 \23- 1.5.,ture ~C Hunfer 0 I b 023\ *1 1.. , A b ; 1 1 IE i . ____--7( -' I ..# /0 91 0/ U F.lusâ‚¬ Â¢ Tent Wood Duck Ln .4 1/ 0 1., - , . 64, Gltles ie St - 1 ..1 1 - 1 4 /1.- Pe r' C[ Golf Course f \ i, f '6 -- , /7/0> rh. /9 440#LS,770 4 I - \1 & Whe St 0 1 4/ t ne,S S f --' P m d / 4/ X . <04 8 I I '. .. \\'. t @~11,11/ r el .A f 2 r e 1 4 4 1% 1 - Race t 4,4 6 Maronn Creek Ad 3 0 St 4 14 - . P 2 4 3, *I . S out Av 8% - 9#9 Â£?wmai 6 .,6 \1\ % ajh St % Pk (-fic* t rinc, '1:60*44 P ..& 00 . 4 e 9 60 4 1 f '' b 44 L: ~ 6 If /, 444 '/ 9 39 n - 3 / a -4/ 4 i ./9, v 2 5 Elite/\ 4 1 /42 0. - do Â®21 4.9, 42-42 - p#'Me P,â€ž , 4 9. 4 0 5 - D C : e Â¢ S - et / 9:_>r< c *4 Mall C 0 5 )2 Â¢ 4 . 22 2 0, E /08*iÂ«. f *34 jua St 9 Oateâ€¢ 2 f 8/kip,â€ž 01 , f V Glf rt na ; t :S ,~~ 'SA Summa St -7 01' i o .2 *9 4 2 '44444 ~ * y As n Grove 94 4. i R /PS Pl - ~st.view :7 ute m . 1.ria - mifv 46' -1. 3Â·24 h' - l. , ///--- 0 \ \0 1 - . 'tt -O 1 0 , 0 pk 82 * 4 /44 0 ..7 *4 r / L-J f /- ..., \.\J 4 00 a d. D 6, h 9.. n k i. 1 0 e $ a X) rn I '11 !II . *6-Ad e ~~i-<1 \O 1 0 cl.. 1 1 [ 82 \ >-1 VICINITY MAP 5â€ž4,1 u,Nt,C 1Nand013'A30 ALINAININOO C'!alliet# 4= Heather LO'PV ) Nly I Irl /0NFIdSÂ¥ DON 9 2.9nv ph.UZLEL/--\ 4 ''Â·*.ltr, Laurel ~ stryker brown ARCHITECTS Meeting Notes: TO: HPC FROM: Steven Buettow DATE: August.24.2000 RE: Project Description, attachment 4 This existing unit is #13 in the Brand Condominiums, 205 S. Galena. We are proposing to remodel the existing Roof Deck. The current Deck is 619.75 SF. It is a raised wooden platform with metal sitting chairs and has an existing gas grill. We are proposing to expand the Deck to 1,112.26 SF with additional wooden platforms. They will be 2x6 redwood decking over 2x 6 redwood joist. Since the roof slopes from East to West and the top of roof elevation varies, we are proposing two platform elevations stepping down 7" in similar relation to the roof. From the existing stair tower we are proposing to build a covered porch of approximately 175 SF. This new porch element will comply with the porch definition in the Land Use Code. It will also be under the 40' height limitation. There will be no FAR increase. Two new planter boxes will be built to surround the deck with green vegetation. Hanging plant boxes will be installed on the North side from the new 42" solid rail. A Hot tub will be placed on the West side of the lower platform. We are proposing to keep the existing gas grill and install a sink cabinet adjacent to it. Overall, we have kept a 3'-0" space between the new deck and the existing 3'-0" building North parapet wall. And we placed the covered porch toward the middle of the deck away from the buildings North side and a possible street vision. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 119 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970.925.2100 925.2258 (FAX) 0 ---- 0 ARCHITECTS Meeting Notes: TO: HPC FROM: Steven Buettow DATE: August.24.2000 RE: attachment 5 1. This proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel because there are numerous other developed Roof Decks on this building. Units 12,14 & 15 have them in addition to the existing one that we are remodeling. 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the charactor of the neighborhood of the proposed parcel. The new Isis remodel, Aspen Drugstore and Independence Square buildings have roof terrace development and one story elements surrounding them. Covered Roof elements are seen in town. 3. The proposed development enhances the historical significance of the designated historic structures located on this parcel because it will not relate to the basic historic building form. The majority of the changes will be hidden by the existing parapet wall. The remainder are set well back from the building face and if seen at all will be a similar cedar shingles look appropriate to its time. 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural charactor and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. This proposal is 85% hidden by the existing parapet wall and will never be seen. The covered porch element improves the existing stair tower silhouette and adds a wood and shingle element to the existing glass and metal stair structure. New green vegetation will humanize and greatly improve the present bare roof top appearance of rubber membrane,wood packing crates, metal roof top ventilator units, skylights and exposed silver ducts. RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / Pll KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 119 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970.925.2100 925.2258 (FAX) Sent By: Richard A. Wall & Assoc~s; 310 288 0849; A L) g - t~,00 8:53AM; Page 3/3 111(â€¢ar. 1 Wall 905 N. Hartford Way - Beverly Hills, California 90210 - U,S.A Phone (310) 288 0891 - Fax (3-to) 288 0849 - Email RW90210@801.coni Cellular: (619)723 492y (310) 801 0922 Auguat 25,2000 TO: Aspen community Development FROM Richard A. Wall RE. 205 S. Gatena Street, Unit #1 1, Aspen, Colorado Via Facisimile: c/o Stryker Brown Architects - 970 925 2100 To whom it may concern; Pursuant to the application to HPC Minor Development Review 1 submit the following information, viz; Applkant Pacific Equities, Ltd., a Nevada Corporation. Pacific Equities is a wholly owned corporation ofRichard A. Wall, President and Secretary. Addr;ss: 7538 Caminito Avola, La Jolla, California 92037 (Residence owned by Richard A. Wall 1*1@pbans: 310 288 0891/310 801 0922 U: By Attachment I hereby confirm that all of the above information is current and correct. Thank you for your cooperation and courtesies in this matter, [ remain. Sincerely yours, /n r/i ~/--h \ AA /,--4. I j - W d, U VV * t,- 6#C-Â£*U,OK_-g,L,v --l L-/' Richard A. Wall RAW/mr RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / PIt KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Sent By: Richard A. Wall & Assocallas; 310 288 0840; Aug - ~@,00 8:52AM; Pag' 00 08/24 THU 10:55 FAX August 24,2000 Aspen Community Development 130 South Gatena St, Aspen, Colorado Re: Richard Wall HPC Minor Development Review To whom it may concern: I hereby authorize Stryker Brown Architects to act as my designated and authorized representative with respect to the land use application being submitted to your office for our property located at 205 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado. Slryker Brown Architects is authorized to submH an application for an HPC Minor Development Review on our property. They, or their assigns. are authorized to represent us In meetings with City staff, boards, commissions and City Council. Should you have any need to contact me during the course of your review, please do so through Stryker Brown Architects, whose address and telephone numbers are provided in the application. Sincerely, -a Â»0 1 4 â‚¬9 / 1- 1 Richard Wall RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / Ptl KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Sent By: J.L. Dezigns; 310 275 2695; Aug-~iâ€¢00 9:11 AM; Page 1/2 . COMMITMENT SamIRE A Sar~ye Mlitaker Coates/Faid/Waldron 720 East Hynen Aspen, 00 81611 1. Effective Date: March 14, 2000 at 7:00 AM (kder No. 406472 -C MM/mv (1-toâ€¢er RefÂ«-10 ElÂ®*aN 2. AIZER Owner' s Folicy Amount: S 675,000.00 Proposed Ing,red: P,CIFIC EQUITIES, UID. NEVADA CCRraUTICN 3. ALTA Iom Rdiciâ‚¬= -mt: S Propoled Ineur.d: Proposed Insured: -ant: $ 4. Vhe estate or intaIeet in 8* lad deecribed or refeired to in 1his Co-ibient and co*Wid herain i.: FEE SIMPLE and title thereto i= at tlie effecti- date hereof velited in: AIRIEÂ»E DOYLE Eâ€¢INIAN 1.luld 4 : Owner' s Premium: 8 944.00 ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION Lender' e Premiun: S 600 EAST IÂ¤PKINS AVEPUE #305 Add' 1 Ia,der Cho: $ ASPEN 00 81611 Add' 1 Charges: S FAX 970-920-4052 Tax Cartificabe: S 10Â·00 PH 970-920-4050 DENVER 303-595-8463 Er*k=ge,~rt ag: S 'MED Charges: 8 WIAL alaRGES: $ 954.00 RECEIVED FIRST AM~â‚¬ICAN TITLE INSLEUNCE (IMPANY AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN / Pll KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Sent By: J.L. Dezigns; 310 275 2G95; Aug-25-00 9:11 AM; Page 2/2 COMMITMENT Plat id No. Scamu! A (ecntl:niBd) 01:d., No. 406472 -C 5. The land referred to in the Cc~it,ent il covarin; the land in the State of 001**ado, Ocurty of Pitkin , deocribed aâ€¢ follow~: unit 13, BRAN] BUILDIN), aooording to th, Mae tiBreof filed kguet 6, 1990, in Plat Book 24 at Page 53 and acooiding to the Condominium Declaration reoxckl August 6, 1990, in Book 626 at Page 628. RECEIVED FIRST AMâ‚¬RICAN TITLE INSUU,NCE OC!â‚¬9NY AUG 2 5 2000 ASPEN/MIKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .... F brown ~ 119 S. SPRING ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 Â· FAX: 925.2258 1. I 4 9 + strykerbrown.com 4 , 4 . :-1-Â¥ 4 6 & , D . .2. r .... I . 1 A . L - . I . $ I - 1 : -4 1 1 1 1 11 Roof Deck 1 111 , 1 11 1 11 1 11/4 M# '~ h . Richard Wall Northeast from City Hall Northeast from Main Street Brand Building in the Unit 133, Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 t . I ... .'- I :. .----,: 4Â·* : Â·t. r <i ,* Townsite of Aspen Pitkin County, Colo. . . -. -*. .: 'PI-/..... . 205 S. Galena Street %*ti.*41% i# . '. 0 t + .. . â€¢' + -Â·~~'* ~* ** 2 4. %?**,'* j>K*pit-!0~?Â·Â·. â€¢%.â€¢':fl~=*'â€¢'~â€¢': Â· Aspen, CO -/1,401/54 1. . f. -C I -4, .1. 2 1,-r'F. 4 *:tâ€¢-49: C.05'efqt(E5FZ# . b':Liti2~~~~-~'; C + 26 .7,1.6 1 .:4'.EaL:214//:4# /.10Â· 4% I --,7â€¢,M/li/4 A it ..1 .... ,~ * â€¢- 1 DATE: ISSUEÂ· AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN %. ' 4 , .%4 - . -0. I 11- 1 /1 1 -1/w--ir &10 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 6,4 -2 1 - ,-. 1 .. -94 -1 11 -- 1 - - ...0 7-- , 1 1 - IRL--- â€ž 1 - 121 - 1441 - 11 -= r , 1- 296 6 4/0, 6 1 1 6 + ' 9/4, SK. + 4... . -1 - 1 - 4- 4 1-1 ,-- PHOTOS RECEIVED Southeast from Hyman Southeast from Elks Building AUG 2 5 2000 A O.1 ASPEN / Pll KIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. 1 .... stryker 6own 119 S. SPRING ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com EXISTING PARAPET WALL 1 ~ '~ / FLOWER BOXES MOUNTED ON RAIL / / /' j. NEW 42" SOLID RAIL 11 \ 1 , ! 1 I 1 #SUN :ET L J OPEN WOOD DECK VIEW NG U Â· NEW 42" 1 i i ' EXISTING STAIRS SOLID RAIL TREE i TO ROOF SITTING i - AREA- i COVEREO Â®CIN 1 1 WOOD E -~~-~ A~~A ' le----1 . I C ..--.J DECK I ENTERTANNE,--1-1 Richard Wall Roof Deck <C<7'0 ~ < -- _1 i ( HOT 4 -----Â·Â·Â·- EXPAND EXISTING < TUB /7 ' 1 STRUCTURE FOR STEEP L_3 - = =1 LARGER STAIR in the ./ DOWN DIAMETER - , Brand Building OPEN WOOD DECK TREE BENCH ENTERTAINMENT , Unit 13, AREA ' Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 7 J Pitkin County, Colo. ,-NEW 42" SOLID RAIL , 205 S. Galena Street Townsite of Aspen C 0.-0. 1 -- BOX PLANTER - Aspen, CO - EXISTING SKYLIGH~\ / ~ |~ TREE || TO HALLWAY BELCW Y / 1 EXISTING ROOF 14 DATE: ISSUE: SLOPE AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN ---- EXISTING PRIVATE SKYLIGHT- TYPICAL -.0 RECEIVED PLANS Roof Deck Plan AUG 2 5 2000 1/8Â· = 1'-0" SCALE ASPEN / PffKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A 2.1 ' 44\\\Â». 44Â»\\Â«\X\Â«1\1\~il/ M.\Rl\i\1\14\Â·.. 1\42,\\\\\* . .... ~ brown 119 S. SPRING ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com r> ./ 1.- 9 4 4 ' - 8 I $ 2. Richard Wall I .; I-I+-...9 Roof Deck p /44-9~ <<21(. '- \ fi \ \ 1 red \ [\07Â¢M> ~ - in the 1/ , I ..8. 9 11 / - -,/,5> Brand Building \DV . 4\ . \ ./0/ 2 // Unit 13, Lots G,H & I, Block 88 Townsite of Aspen 1 1 *3 l/ Pitkin County, Colo. HM It - 205 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO NÂ«: Â»0\ 1 1 i Il AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN DATE: ISSUE: \\ \\ ISOMETRIC SOUTHWEST ISOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE RECEIVED PERSPECTIVES AUG 2 5 2000 A 3.1 ASPEN / PiTKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .... stryker brown 1.- NEW ROOF WOOD SHINGLE ROOFING WATER PROOFING 5/8' PLYWOOD 119 S. SPRING ST. 2 X 6'S @ 16' OC ASPEN, CO 81611 / EXPOSED JOIST -- T. ROOF RIDGE 970.925.2100 111'.9 FAX: 925.2258 Â·---- - 1 ROOF RIDGE strykerbrown.com - 110'-1' _- EXISIINGSIAIR loW- 9 T ROOF BEARING -0 " 108'-1~ t-- .... IX4 WOOD COLUMNS WITH EXPOSED METAL CONNECTIONS TO JOIST - ~ AND DECKING -,- NEW HOTTUB Â· 23, .-'' ,, NEW PLANTER BOX k 57/7 . ' 7Â£-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·7 NEW 42' SOLIDIAL Ph OFÂ¢101 / P t.4 1 2/ 4, 3 T. UPPER PLATFORM= 100Â·Â·7Â· rET-1 CIL~ Â·Â·Â·4&-Â· 4 / NEW 7' DEEP FLOOR: k T LOWER PLATFORM= 100-0Â· 2 XB REDWOOD DECKING 6 L OVER 2*6 REDWOOD JOIST- PLACE OVEA EXISTING ROOF RUBBER MEMBRANE T. EXISTING ROOF. VARIES WATERPROOFING- EXISTING SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS ROOF ELEVATION VARIES CROSS SECTION B/ A4.1 1/8' = 1'-0Â· SCALE Richard Wall - NEW ROOF .---7-oÂ» WOOD SHINGLE ROOFING Roof Deck WATER PROOFING 5/8" PLYWOOD 2 X 6'S @ 16" OC in the EXPOSED JOIST T. ROOF RIDGE Brand Building 7951' &, 111'-g" 8/12 ROOF T. ROOF RIDGE 1/3 POINT Unit 13, Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 110'-1" Townsite of Aspen - :/.#90>-tz --- I Pitkin County, Colo. N T. ROOF BEARING 205 S. Galena Street NOTE: 1//. 4 X 4 WOOD COLUMNS 108'-1" Aspen, CO 7911.7' SIDEWALK . -------- ~ ~ WITH EXPOSED METAL CONNECTIONS TO JOIST ELEVATION PLUS AND DECKING 40' BUILDING HEIGHT = LIMIT= 7951.7' 4 -// -- NEW 42" SOLID RAIL CD , ., NEW GRILL h - / DATEÂ·. ISSUE: AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN -in - E-- - *-~Â· AREA NOT DISTURBED - 7942' - -4 - ~- Lf ~f~r ~ ~/.if -.0- R=? 21'lf)ING T. UPPER PLATFORM= 100'-70 TOP OF ROOF -Â« 'lljj;11911*111111'ill#ll#l/jillill jUUM#Il jllilll jllitilll/Il li,jljillilll%+U-11111/;Nlill jljlll/li, I. C AT STAIR ---4 * .. 0 R T. EXISTING ROOF= VARIES 6 g SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS -- NEW 7" DEEP FLOOR: 2 X 6 REDWOOD DECKING OVER 2X6 REDWOOD JOIST- PLACE OVER EXISTING ROOF 7911.7' WATERPROOFING- EXISTING RUBBER MEMBRANE CROSS SIDEWALK ROOF ELEVATION VARIES SECTIONS ELEVATION WALL SECTION B/ A5.1 RECEIVED 1/4Â· = 1'-0Â· SCALE AUG 2 5 2000 A 4.1 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .9-1 119 S. SPRING ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com 9 9 9 ./ap1 9 .EXISTING PARAPET WALL Â© ..+ j FLOWER BOXES ! i 1 1 / . 1 MOUNTED ON RAIL i 4 1 // 1 1 1 1 1 / /' .. ~ NEW 36" GUARD RAIL 1 1 , '1 1 ; / ,/ ,/ 1 SEE OPEN RAIL DETAIL 0---- . 7 1 M I l NEW 36" 1 SOLID RAIL N ' 9'-0Â· PAINT TO MATCH STONE ~ 1 ~ ................ 3'. , GRILL I SUNEET PMNT El ' i . EXISTING 1 1 ~ EXIS#-INd STAIN. 3 1 ~11----/--- -- STAIR TOWER 1 TÂ©Ooft \1\:1 1 1 SITTING I I Ii:I it , 11- 1 C AREA- 'ME 1 //1 & f 1 Ilt \ WOOD , I, 1 ' \ I / 1 :1 11 Richard Wall - Roof Deck 11 5 1 7,0 ' 1 \LEXPANSIoN k J - - -Â·1 STAIR TOWER in the DOWN 3 1 -. & -- 1 1 Brand Building 3 1 . OPEN WOOD DECK i ' EXPAND EXISTING 5 | PLANTER : 1 ENTERTAINMENT 1 1 STRUCTURE FOR 5 1 BENCH ' AREA ' ' LARGER STAIR Unit 13, 1 1 ) 1 DIAMETER Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 ~ ~~ Townsite of Aspen 1 1 - -i Pitkin County, Colo. ,>NEW 24" SOLID RAIL ~ --- , L ' ' 205 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO I T-- 1 -- INEW 42"SOLID RAIL / 9 11 Ill / -=4 1 1 PLANTER ~ CD 1 1 1 EXISTING SKYLIGH< 1>41 DATE: ISSUE: \ 1 1 1 1 TO HALLWAY BELOW i 1 | AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1 X EXISTING ROOF NOV. 8.2000 HPC REVISIONS ' / r..4\ SLOPE 1 11 4. i.... f. ....-r...M.......M.- - 1 : i i i -- i EXISTING PRIVATE i ! 1 SKYLIGHT- TYPICAL ~ 66 6 6 6 6 6 Roof Deck Plan PLANS 1/8'Â· = 1'-0" SCALE A 2.1 1 e0 41,43,1,m ........... - stryker brown 119 S. SPRING ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com T. RIDGE 111'-0' ' EXISTING STAIA BUILDING MAXIMUM HEIGHT 1 , T. BRG. L PROPOSED STAIR ROOF= 108'-8 108'-111 -- Â·Â·Â·t ' ~-~~~LIli 1. 4 ~ T. EXISTING STAIR ROOF= 108'-1Â· I NEW HOT TUB IN RAISED WOODEN WATER PROOF CONTAINER . 27 ~ . i T. EXISTING ROOF L 2 -, VARIES- SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS 1 bo NE,N36" 40 l.1 O e ' - -A* F i .~=~~'1-7 *m r'--Â£-1 ,- ' ' T. LOWER i *'PARD FAF >- _ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~EL-ZEE~~~~~ PLATFORM 100Â·-7,1 PLATFORMI 100'-0" -I U T. EXISTING ROOF j _ _ _ _ i - NEW PLANTER BOX VARIES- SEE SPOT El]EVATIONS Richard Wall Roof Deck NEW EXISTING C~ , in the Brand Building Unit 13, Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 Townsite of Aspen Pitkin County, Colo. South Elevation 205 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO NEW ROOF -----'-" WOOD SHINGLE ROOFING WATER PROOANG 5/8" PLYWOOD 2 X 6'S @ 16" OC BUILDING MAX HEIGHT - -- EXPOSED JOIST T. ROOF MAX HEIGHT 6 k T. ROOF BEARING 3 4 --. - T T. ROOF BEARING= 7Â·Â·9 1/2Â· DATE: ISSUE: a-: - "- =+ r~ 7 - -- Il ~~1 --- -- - -- -v ._-_._._- NEW STAIRTOWER AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 107'-9 1/2' Nov. 2, 2000 HPC REVISIONS NEW GRILL ...-< . - -- EXTENSION- 2*6 WOOD - STUD WALLS WITH CLAD WINDOWS AND SHINGLE ROOF ;, NEW 36Â· OPEN RAIL-Â·....-- - --~-'.-- 3 ll EXISTING BUILDING ROOF- ELEV VARIES T. UPPER PLATFORM= 100;-7~ T. UPPER PLATFORM= 1007 - C T. LOWER PLATFORM= 100'-0" 4 4 T. LOWER PLATFORM= 100'-0" , I ~----~ . NEW 7" DEEP FLOOR: T. EXISTING ROOF= VARIES 2 X 6 REDWOOD DECKING SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS OVER 2X6 REDWOOD JOIST- - PLACE OVER EXISTING ROOF RUBBER MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING- EXISTING ROOF ELEVATION VARIES ELEVATIONS 1/8" = 1'-0' SCALE West Elevation A 3.1 D . . . . NEW METAL ROOF WATER PROOFING IE~ brown 5/8" PLYWOOD - 2 X 6'S @ 16" OC EXPOSED JOIST 119 S. SPRING ST. HEIGHT ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 - .- -- - . ~.-- --= FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com I /11 ....'Ir' . 1- Â» .=-- 1 REMODELED ---~~~~~ L/- STAIR TOWER - --- - ' Â·r- ---IM> EL, CD - 1 1 2- - --- - 7 T - 2.-If 73.22 0 -_ 1.-10 27 3-f~/*m~%.s 'Ill I Ill lililillillillil!1111!1111Ill:1111 11'111111111<l Ill Ilillilll:ll Ill 11111111 ill Il Iii Richard Wall Roof Deck North Elevation West Elevation in the Brand Building Unit 13, Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 Townsite 01 Aspen Pitkin County, Colo. 205 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 2 DATE: ISSUE: 1 1 - AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN Nov. 7, 2000 HPC REVISIONS rl 1 il-- 239*92%{ 2%22**262),dvL,kkkkxk.z:5Â·*CLÂ»- --------j- f I-#- ELEVATIONS East Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0Â· SCALE South Elevation A 3.2 11'dull lu : .... <RF-1~ -... ----*.---- FF L./ 2 x 6 WOOD CAP / 2x4 STUDS TOP & BOTTOM 1 8" x 8" REMOVEABLE PLANTER BOX '' -i \ ATTACH TO WOOD STUDS [ 9 4" X 4" WELDED WIRE FABRIC 00 r-1--I Lt 4 2x4 REDWOOD STUDS - E -... 1 ,-/Â»\\ SEE ROOF CONNECTION DETAILS /~~1 TYPICAL 36" OPEN GUARD RAIL @ NORTH < Wl p <AF- 1 f) ... 6 + 6.> 1*KdfNE'2- al< 4[lf f0fÂ®1~, /40 +INÂ»l BOIA'PhÂ«4uffoFF \ A 44+1011" -roft- 640['Nr F+45\. \ Fr".-b- 49 +Ili-*-8 41[~ _ - PMN-|' 19612 . 1 ~4 Nwr- rloAL~ j,j 1 11 1 4 \\ -4,--- M I -Ii.-:.==2 1-*i. Vt 1 4.t- 1 6 * 0 -4 litÂ· r 4 I hk- L j 2 - A 1,1 1 - 1 1 I 1. 1- . le . 1 *vx-:- <* *r--=2, 1 A --I N- -es#pec ~: . â‚¬1110 11*0 ll. 66*1/8/ . I .. .... 2 x 10 WOOD CAP PAINT DARK BROWN 22 0><0 11 " 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. STAINED 3/4" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWD. (R.S. CEDAR VENEER) CO - -- 3/4" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWD. - PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING STONE 2x6 REDWOOD STUDS - SEE ROOF CONNECTION DETAILS A TYPICAL 36" SOLID GUARD RAIL @ WEST < W2 \ /~h, 441 .. - 1% ./.Mill.WI'll- 1 ROOF PLAN 1, - 1 f m m - 49 7949 2 ] p RAS 4 PARAPET . 1_ ' - 79 -34 9~- FLOOR J h - n' UN f \ 0 -19'Z.(2 9< FLOOR r - 4 1 1 - 97 6 1 !43 44 Â» R t! 1 - SCA 7901 k Aspen 21{ ' -a.-al *is 1. r 0 0 0 4 4. .kÂ¢ ~ brown /37 4. R f 4 l 119 S SPRING ST 970.925.2100 ASPEN, CO 81611 FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com 9 9 9 /Â¢*\STINGPARAPETWALL ~ 9 1 9 3 /' FLOWER BOXES 1 1 , 1 MOUNTED ON RAIL i \\ . Â· NEW 36" GUARD RAIL | | â€ž ~/ 1 SEE OPEN RAIL DETAIL 1 1 0-- -- - i. /1 1 NEW 36" -"Â·- -- 1 --Â· Â·Â·- Â·- .-4 -- -'- 1 Â·Â·Â£Â·- - - Â·/Â· - r SOLID RAIL 2 1 1 1 9'-0" / 30 PAINT TO MATCH STONE 3 1 1 1 ---â€žâ€ž. ................ 1.---4-.4 1 0 / . GRILL / 1 f SONEET i . EXISTING 3 Purn- 31 0 , ~ ~ L EXISfIN& SfrAIN ? I VI....---- STAIR TOWER 4 T*000 j * \l SITTING 5-7. Ili 't k 1 /, }1 111 Richard Wall AREA- WOOD r - FPROPbsED [ ' Roof Deck 1 70 | I Ii I ifXPANSION k L----1 1 STAIR TOWER '\ STAIR 1 1 1----- NEW 1 HOT 1 1 1 1-W===Irt=2&=-2 1 -.4 ---- -0 94 1 99 -_ 1 1 -1 1 1 Â» -+4- - _ -_ 0 9-34 Brand Building OPEN WOOD DECK EXPAND EXISTING P .<6 1 PLANTER 1 1 ENTERTAINMENT I STRUCTURE FOR BENCH AREA ' LARGER STAIR Unit 13, 1 1 Â·1 1 DIAMETER Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 1 3 V il i i pNEW 24" SOLID RAIL Pitkin County, Colo. /// 1 205 S. Galena Street Townsite of Aspen - 4 i i Aspen, CO (~ - 1 -- -4 -- -- -- --- 1-2_c ~ TBOX PLANTER- 92 -_._._. _ _ _ =-=t~yi= 4-_ _. _ - _ _ _Â® 1- - ~NEW 42" SOLID RAIE~>3 -2- 11 -11 - hL 1 1 f >/ 1 1 1 * EXISTING SKYLIGH< 1 1 1 TO HALLWAY BELOW i 14 DATE: ISSUE: 1 AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMA-TIC DESIGN i EXISTING Roof NOV. 8,2000 HPC REVISIONS 1 1 /.; r~..A SLOPE 1 1 C......4------- 1 1 /1 ,- v~ ~ ': ----0 - i i i ----- i EXISTING PRIVATE i i i SKYLIGHT- TYPICAL 66 6 6 6 6 6 - Roof Deck Plan PLANS 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE A 2.1 .Â»a Â»%6Â» a WofÂ»A. . -'. - r $ 0 0 0 0 .- 119 S. SPRING ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com T. RIDGE 111'-9" 1 1 EXISTING STAIR BUILDING MAXIMUM HEIGHT .--1 -- I. T. BRG. T. PROPOSED STAIR ROOF= 108'-8' 108'-1" Â·Â·Â· -bl''---.. - -----. --- - u KN ~~"~ T. EXISTING STAIR ROOF= 108i.1 J NEW HOT TUB ,=1 -23 51 IN RAISED WOODEN WATER PROOF CONTAINER . 1 -Li --07 . 1 T. EXISTING ROOF N 2 ..VARIES- SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS BIO NEFF'36" 90(.10 1/ Ir--1 F~l#9~1 (3 1 Fl F__1 ~=a f--El T. LOWER i Â£31'1~61) CAILI>--.-.----- 51 1 //-'/' 1 T. UPP RPLATFORM 100Â·-7 PLATFORM i 1001 -_ i - NEW PLANTEA BOX 1 T. EXISTING ROOF j -----I~WI.-i- VARIES- SEE SPOT ENEVATIONS Richard Wall Roof Deck < I NEW ~ EXISTING > in the Brand Building Unit 13, Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 Townsite of Aspen Pitkin County, Colo. South Elevation 205 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO NEW ROOF ----'-- WOOD SHINGLE ROOFING WATER PROOFING 5/8" PLYWOOD 2 X 6'S @ 16" OC BUILDING MAX HEIGHT EXPOSED JOIST T. ROOF MAX HEIGHT T. ROOF BEARING 7 r-~ 1 Y T. ROOF BEARING= 7-9 1/2" DATE: ISSUE: 107'-91/2" AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1 _...._...._Â·-Â·Â·-Â· NEW STAIR TOWER NEW GRILL . - EXTENS]ON- 2*6 WOOD Nov. 21 2000 HPC REVISIONS --- STUD WALLS WITH CLAD WINDOWS AND SHINGLE ROOF & NEW 36'OPEN RAIL--- -~~\... 29 .--4 h - 11 // _Al'grva='A T. UPPER PLATFORM= 100'-7" T UPPER PLATFORM= 100'-7' T. LOWER PLATFORM= 100'-0" 4 4 T. LOWER PLATFORM= 100'-0' NEW 7" DEEP FLOOR: T. EXISTING ROOF= VARIES 2 X 6 REDWOOD DECKING SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS OVER 2X6 REDWOOD JOIST - PLACE OVER EXISTING ROOF RUBBER MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING- EXISTING ROOF ELEVATION VARIES ELEVATIONS 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE West Elevation A 3.1 .... NEW METAL ROOF stryker b~Own WATER PROOFING 5/8" PLYWOOD 2 X 6'S @ 16" OC EXPOSED JOIST 119 S. SPRING ST. HEIGHT -X ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2100 FAX: 925.2258 strykerbrown.com â€¢r- 1 -=-t LEI - 7 '-1 " 19 r--, - REMODELED --t' - STAIR TOWER = - > A CD - Of..- 'llillill'llillifililli~lillililll/Ilriljlll INHHH Illill 11111111111111/1111/111111, Richard Wall Roof Deck North Elevation West Elevation in the Brand Building Unit 13, Lots G,H & 1, Block 88 Townsite of Aspen Pitkin County, Colo. 205 S. Galena Street LIJ FT--. 0 3 Aspen, CO DATE: ISSUE: AUGUST 23 2000 SCHEMATIC DESIGN Nov. 7, 2000 HPC REVISIONS 1 . :IZZ 1 1 1 ' .I .I (((t# 1 ~I _l 1fl l i t 'li _ j ll jill_ i l lill L- l lll[ ul ul u.1 111 11231111.- . ___ _.__ ELEVATIONS East Elevation 1/8Â· = 1'-0" SCALE South Elevation A 3.2 ''' d lili 1/ -.... < RF-1 ~ . 1.-. ...... VV-W . . ., .....1 .-A 0 flo 2 x 6 WOOD CAP 2x4 STUDS TOP & BOTTOM - a./.- 8" x 8" REMOVEABLE PLANTER BOX !\ ATTACH TO WOOD STUDS I 0 / -- -- 4,1 X 4" WELDED WI RE FABRIC h 2x4 REDWOOD STUDS - c 320 < ..r SEE ROOF CONNECTION DETAILS ~~~\ TYPICAL 36" OPEN GUARD RAIL @ NORTH <Wl p <AF- l '31Â¥747 .8 01 4 4 ii 4 _ A ' 1 *147 e 1, 4 - 1,---3/V -- 1' 1 '.,t' - er _ ... .. - m.- - . -------- -/ 2.97 ~ . i t :-1 C $ I ~-1 4 ' 1 1- 1 | 6 14 V k 44 i - 3 1 6. i & 1 1,3 , 1 Â·t 1 IA :f 1 i lf# R 1 Jl F t 1.fA !> ~. __ _ _~ ~ 1 k /0, -- B~ - 5 1 ! U\\ 1 \ \~17#0 03LN'*I - y'll th,-F~ 1, , 3 70,8 *Hw-7*'?iÂ¥-3117(?1{~ / 1 \\,544 "41,614&14 .IMOM**0 / 1 J.441911Â»6410914-0*3LHI-+ >4/ \*WJMP >le =13Nk 011 90 9 , ... .... 2 x 10 WOOD CAP PAINT DARK BROWN =I :DÂ·Â«~ E- 1 <-X K ->NE 9 6- -9 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. rÂ·- STAINED 3/4" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWD. (R.S. CEDAR VENEER) 09 - 3/4" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWD. - - PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING STONE 2x6 REDWOOD STUDS - SEE ROOF CONNECTION DETAILS .- .-I ~1 TYPICAL 36" SOLID GUARD RAIL @ WEST <W2 p . I ~:. '.~~~~~i. /1, /4 ' 1 11 f.w t 5. .. 4 f>(til im 3. 1 i. I It' i ROOF PLAN \. If . 5 1 1 , , 1 L 1 +S 7949 8 4 /94S PARAPE-r I- 1 - 7--=- 1 .-. 79-346- FLOOR 1 , \ -79 Z (2 9 ' F LOOR < - I . 9\ 0 Ih 1 . 1 -Ii"'-./.-'-Il-/Il'.....'I.-I , , R 0 ill'll'll"lillillillillil - 1 SCA 1902 4 Aspen 2ll 4 792 - L / 6 = -3._186_k-6-