Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.205 S Mill St.HPC27-93
CA-- %. GO NJ - 1- 03 .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 10/6/93 CASE NUMBER: HPC27-93 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: PROJECT NAME: Chanin's Restaurant Minor Development Review Project Address: 205 S. Mill St., Lots D - I, Block 81 APPLICANT: Aspen Restaurant Assoc. L.P Applicant Address: P. O. Box 8610, Aspen, CO 81612 REPRESENTATIVE: James Terry, Gibson & Reno Architects Representative Address/Phone: 418 E. Cooper Aspen, CO 81611 5-5968 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: ~< 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: i 1 P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: 0 4, 0 1- N MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 205 S. Mill Street, Chanin's Restaurant, Minor Development DATE: October 13, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests minor development approval to install a canvas awning over the restaurant entrance. The awning is to be the same color, but not the same form as those on the rest of the building. APPLICANT: Aspen Restaurant Association L.P., represented by Gibson and Reno Architects, 925-5968. LOCATION: 205 S. Mill Street (Mill Street Plaza), Lots D-I, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING DEPARTMENT ISSUES: In order to meet the open space requirements for this parcel, the awning must be retractable. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H, " Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark... Response: The structure is adjacent to several landmarks and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. Several awnings already exist on Mill Street Plaza and on neighboring historic buildings and new buildings. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Awnings are consistent with the character of the Commercial Core. The proposed awning is not a "traditional" form, but reflects the shape of the roof and will provide the needed shelter for the entrance and stair landing. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed awning will be visible from a public way, but will have only a minimal impact on the appearance of the Mill Street Plaza and will not detract from neighboring historic resources. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: No historic structure is directly impacted by this proposal. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted. Additional Comments: ATI:ACEN,ENr 1 ~ LAND USE APPIICAEON FORM '~ft tr o l,- - :~1 01 7. 1 . ... L..2 ' :.9-':t~ 11 1 1) projec£ Mane . 641AN Ilds . KEST-A ag-ANT- 1 , i -t:iNkil ~ 2. (Er - 6 1993 li-j 71-·i 2) Project Iocation 205 S. M/LE ST: 1~ 't i . I 2 1 il \ LaT-s D ,E, P.6 H. I &-solc_ 8[ (indicate street acklress, £ot & block Inmber, legal de=cript46,9-*here_____ awng)riate) 3) Present Zoning 0 41 4) Iot Size 1 8,006 -5. F. < 5) 40idares lieme, Mamss·,& axxe * ASPEN 12€STAcleAA/7- A 5506. L.P. : 9.0.0* RGED A,5 F€N, 60 2/6/,2- 920·2858 €h FegceseralkiNe's *me. la™,ms & 2•xe # 6/13606/ 4 /2€ND A/26*/7an-25. *le a. Cooee R kEReN, CE> 816// 925·5748 7) Vpd of Application (please check all that qpply): - . 4 Conditicnal Use _ Conceptual SPA .il-= ooncepfwl Historic Dev. Special Review - Final SEA - Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual POD ~ Minor Hish-n-in Dev. 1. Strram Margin · Final IUD -Ii-- Historic Demolition Mount-Al•1 View plane Subdivisicn Hist=ic Designatirn . Cothnini~nization Text/Map Amendment · - GUOS Nlotment Iot S*li~Int line - (NOS E,oenuti,xi Adjustment Desdriptir.1 of Fbdsting Uses · (r•mher ani f type of ecisting strIntures; approocimate sq. ft; Ilmber of bedroals; any previcus approvals granted to the property). 67.le»le USE Lows{·SI-5 OF- Art Affl20*/HAre 6%19 *. 26€-FAu BANT /KAA LMATED & -lik M/EL 67*66r PuzA - bult-Dilde · 2 < ' 9) Description of Develoinent Application Devecopty€U-r Al*LIGATION CoN9576 OF- A CANVAS AWN/,46 SaiNG ADD€0 OVE)2----iNE 6%15[1&16 EN1612- . 7#€ AWN/Ne Wwio ExT€ND k MAY,Mull 3-0" Fgbpl E)(/67* 50/LP/Ne AND -516 0060 A- WoOLD HS-[48 1-MAT OF- -11·16 6*15[,Re MNNING,-mlgoo€Hoor -1-NE 10) Have yal attad¥31 ece follglair•i? H/cu drre€er PU-LA BVILD/Me. Ye 5 Response to Attachment 2, Minimmt Suhnission Contents fe 5 Response to Attadment 3, Specific Suhnission Contents 92 5 Respanse to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application 8 1 i.lilli. SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in .a format no larger than 11"x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of' the 11217" format. APPLICANT: 4964 Resr-Ad g.»0- Assco. L.P. ADDRESS: ft D. box 84>10 Asy:St. Co El(611_ ZONE DISTRICT: Dot·i Flegn/AL 60[2·£ Co=h LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 18:DOD 6.P. EXISTING FAR: 46 f 7/5.2 6.F. ALLOWABLE FAR: PROPOSED FAR: N6 Apprr/NAL F.A:R. ADDED EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): 1.3 1 934.25' 5. F, PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): No Aporno,Ac LEASABEE ADDED EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: N/A PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: R[/k EXISTING %OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): 6*702.5 5. F . PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): /(·/0 ZI,4*(AGE 073 Oft-&/ 584€6 EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldg.: / Accessory Bldg: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldg.: /4 0461/GE / Accessory Bldg: PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: O EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 0 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: © EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: O ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: U SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Side: Side: Side: Combined FronVRear: Combined Frt/Rr: Combined Front/Rear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ ENCROACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks Onlv: character compatibility findina must be made bv HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined Frt./Rr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): .. * Park 3 9 4, AN 9 ji 4# Snow Cl /~ - / 0 ,9 K To Basalt St•" 1 +I ./-- 1 4 4 f 4 0%3 - r \ 1 k•IC Y'~ 3 ; . li Ter, - r Golf Courae 85 34«46 r $.. m 9 6 I / 1 1-Ak -1 Smugg•.r Wtn ad Aspen %: 2 44/442» 2-1 /.4 iti Pk L B #* . Hospital % i ~roon Lake < Ft SITE ' * 1 8, .t- Mal h L.*.PurG } ....... 4 1 r . \4~23 @f 0 rL•••-trkt 13 6 - To Twin Lakes,/ Indeper,dence~'Pass VICINITY MAP 9,-6 4 .. IL 6- GIBSON S RENO • ARCHITECTS DAVID F. GIBSON, AIA AUGUST G AEINO. AIA October 6, 1993 SCOTT C. SMITH, Ala Historic Preservation Commission 130 S. Gelena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Amy Amidon Re: Project description for Minor Historic Development to the existing restaurant at 205 S. Mill St. in the Mill St. Plaza Building. Dear Amy, Enclosed is an application for a Minor Historic Development for the existing restaurant at 205 S. Mill St. in the Mill St. Plaza Building. The proposal consists of the addition of a canvas awning over the existing entry to the restaurant. Currently within the Mill St. Plaza there exists numerous canvas awnings throughout the exterior corridors. It is intended for the proposed awning to extend no more than a maximum 3'-0" from the existing building as to not increase the floor area ratio that already exists. The proposed awning is to be of the same color of the awnings that already exist Within the Mill St. Plaza Building. The proposed awning reflects and is consistent with the character of the existing Mill St. Plaza Building adding to the present awnings that exist throughout the existing development. The proposed awnin,g .will enhance the existing development while not distracting from the cultural value of the historic structure or the architectural integrity of the Mill St. Plaza Building and specifically the restaurant located on the upper level of the Mill St. Plaza Building it is to be added to by replicating the curve linear roof shape that exists on the restaurant. Thank you for your consideration of this application and should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, . James Terry 418 E COOPER AVENUE • ASPEN, COLOAADC] 81611 • 303/925-5968 • FAX 303/925-5993 .. L 6-- GIBSON S RENO • ARCHITECTS DAVID F GIBSON. AIA AUGUSTG.RENO. AIA SCOTT C SMITH, AIA August 24, 1993 Re: Letter of Authorization Gibson & Reno Architects, 418 E. Cooper Ave., Aspen, CO 81611, telephone number (303)925-5968, are hereby authorized to act on behalf of the applicant, Aspen Restaurant Associates,L.P., operating under the name of Chanin's Restaurant, P.O. Box 8610, Aspen, CO 81612, telephone number (303)920-2853, on the proposed covering leading to the existing restaurant located in the Mill Street Plaza Building at 205 S. Mill Street in Aspen, Colorado. Paul R. Chanin, President Date 418 E COOPEFR AVENUE • ASPENI, COLORADO 81611 • 303/925-5968 • FAX 303/925-5993 .. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE MANGO'S, INC., a Delaware corporation authorized to do business in the State of Colorado ("Mango's"), hereby assigns all of its right, title and interest in and to the below described lease to Aspen Restaurant Associates L.P., a Colorado limited partnership ("ARA") . ARA, by its acceptance of the within assignment and execution of this Agreement, agrees to assume, on the Effective Date (defined below), all of the terms, conditions and covenants contained in the Lease except as samd may be modified herein. REFERENCE IS MADE to that certain lease ("Lease") dated July 24, 1992 between Mill Street Plaza Associates, a Colorado partnership as "Landlord" and Mango's, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as "Tenant" which Lease involves the premises located at 205 S. Mill Street, being Space NO'. 306', containing approximately 4,000 square feet and a walk-in downstairs refrigerator ("Premises'I) . The Lease is amended to add a provision requiring the posting of a Twenty-Four Thousand and No/100 Dollar ($24,000.00) security deposit by ARA to the Landlord, which sum shall be held to insure ARA's faithful performance of its obligations under the Lease. The security deposit shall be held by the Landlord in an unsegregated account and Landlord shall not be obligated to account for any interest earned thereon to ARA. The security deposit shall be returned to ARA (so long as it has not been used by the Landlord to cure any of ARA's defaults under the Lease) on September 15, 1995. The return of the security deposit shall be conditioned upon there being no uncured default under the Lease existing on September 15, 1995 and, further, upon ARA's not having had during the two-year period commencing on September 15, 1993 and terminating on September 15, 1995, a habit of being habitually late with each month's rent. For purposes of this provision, habitually shall mean more than twice in any calendar year. If such defaults have existed, the security deposit shall be returned at the termination of the Lease. Mango's and its individual guarantors are hereby released from all obligations under the Lease. The Effective Date of the within Assignment of Lease is September 15, 1993. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment of Lease. MANGO'S, INC. Robert BIanchard, President .. ASPEN RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES L.P., a Colorado limited partnership by Aspen Restaurant Corporation, Inc., its general partner 27\. 1 4 By: i Ul ~ .uvuuv~ Paul R. Chanini'President The undersigned, being a principal of Aspen Restaurant Corporation, Inc., the general partner of ARA, hereby personally guarantees to Landlord that ARA shall faithfully pay all sales and withholding taxes attributable to the business being operated by ARA in the premises. 12914 Paul R. Chanin The undersigned, being the Landlord pursuant to the Lease, hereby consents to the within assignment and the amendment to the Lease herein contained and certifies: (1) the Lease is current and in good standing, (2) there exists no Lease default on behalf of the Tenant, (3) rent and all other charges are ·current to September 15, 1993, (4) % rent is not due for the Lease year ending August 1, 1993 and (5) % rent figures for the period commencing August 1, 1993 and ending September 15, 1993 can be based upon Mango's sales tax returns. M*I, STRER~ PLAZA ASSOCIATES L----1X Tony Mazza, Partner MJH\AOT\Mill.ARA ...... " j Iterr,„i,ili N,i. ,V, (:lerk ind Irecorder- 002//1 1-1 DEED OF TRUST 3UUK 438 i.·, i 720 (Commercial & Multi-Family) (Financing Statement; Assignment Of Rents) 11119 131(Ft) (,1 7111JS!' i. n,nite Il,ic . .7th ... ........ d.y „f .....,, January, 19.83...... ,among the Grantor, MILL. .SPREfff. PLMA ,MSOCIATES., A Cclp.r*. reneral .PartnershiP. ...................... ... .................. (herein "Borrower"), whose addiess ij. JClo .Anthony Mazza, , ,434. Fast. Cooper. Street, .Aspen, .Colorado.,. ...81611 the Public Trustee of..... . .....Ritkin....................................········County, Colorado (herein "Trustee"); and the Beneficiary, The Empire Savings, Building ind 1.ran Association, a Colorado corporation, (herein '•Lender"), whose address i: 1654 Californii Street, Denver, Colorado 80202. WrIEREAS. III,rrower mil. ..FPANK. 3.. PEODS,.III.AND.ANTHONY.J....MAZZA. has/have executed a Promissory Note dated . January. 1. , payable to the order of the Lender, in th. principal sum nfl .FDUR, MILLION,AND.NO/10.0............................................,............,. D.11.,;, cs. 4 '.000+000...00. ) with intercu thereon, providing for installments of interest and/or principal, with the balance of the indebtednes, if lii,1 •,inner I,bl, 41,1,· irn.1 p.n :il,le ..n . Fehn,la ry 1 19 .88..(herein "Note"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration or the indebtedness herein recited and the trust herein created, Borrower, for the purpose of securing repayment of the indebtedness evidenced by the Note; the payment of att other sums, with interest thereon, advanced in accordance with this Deed of Trust to protect the security of Illi, Dec,1 „f 1 rust: ilic rerfi,inialice i,f ilic r,ivenani• mil agrecinenti „f Itorrower contained in ihis 1?ced,of Trum: ind the repayment of iny future advances, with interest thercon. made to Horrower Ily I.cniler puriwin, m ilic t{·,1,1, i,f ihis 1){·ed of Trust, i,revocalily grant, and conveys ti, Trustee, In trust, with power of sale, the Pitkin f,ill,iwizig ile•crilied printirrt)· 1,ir~ir,I iii the Coinly „f . ... .,. ,,.,.,., ..... ...,State of Colorado: R 3 r CJ LO Lots D, E, F, G, il, I, Block 81, -- -1 City and Townsite of Aspen; €2 V i C.' 17 111, (:21 C) ; .. 2 2 i;; 91 tri :90 CJ' 0 , 1,1 t.-0 70 which has the strect address of. 211 So. Mill Street .(street) Aspen. .(city), Colorado. .81611. . . . (state and zip code) 1 „icilier with all building<, in,prov~menti. fixttirci or ippwirilifirri. linw or hereafter crected thereon, including, but not timited to, all apparitus, equipment, and fixturer,·! :ther in s:ngle units ,·r eent/!i, cont•,iltcd ii•·/1.ply I,r:t, 0,<, steini, air ctindilitinins. ··ilier. Kilit, Di,wer, refrig:ration, ventilation,cooking, pli•i,iIi· ing. irrigating and power systems. machines, appliances. and any other thing now or hereafter situated therein or thereon which ire now or may hereafter pertain to or be uscd with or in said premises even though they be'detached or detachable, also all buildings, improvements or construction miterial, supplies and equipment now or herrafter delivered to „id premices and intentled to be incorporated and installed therein or used In con,truction thereont •110 all building permits, construction con- tracts, C|aimS and warranties under ctilistruction contracts, tap fees, architecturn| plans ind specificationt relating to con:truction of improvements on said land ind trademarks ind logos related to marketing the property; together with any and 111 rents (subject to the rights and authorities given herein to Lender to ,·ollect and ap ply such rents), profits, royalties, mineral, geothermal resources, oil and gas rights and profits, water, water rights, and water stock, ditch rights, easemints and access rights, now owned or hereafter acquired by Borrower, used, belonging to, or in any way connected with the real property, all of which are declared to b·:, part of .id real pri,prriy, whether phy,icilly miched thereto or not: ind all of the foregoing, together with :aid property (or the le.sehold estate if this Deed of Trust N on . leaschold) are herein referred t„ a, die "I'inpeity"; To have and to hold the Property together with any and all of the rights, privileges, hereditaments and appurtenances in any way appertaining ind belonging there- to. That in the event of any breach or default by Borrower, or his succe$sors in interest, under the terms of the Note or this Deed of Trust, the Lender may file written notice with the Trus[re <Irclating such default ind irs election ind demand that such Property be advertised for sate and sold in acwrdance with the statutes of the Si.ai r •if {:.,1.,ri.1.•. .1 herrilri,n, ilir ·1·,1,11 rr shill *,11 in.1 ,1 i,r•i•r „r i he t'rnprm· mil *11 „f 1 11/ right, title and interrit of the norm wer, hit heirs, Ruccessori, ind alligns, at public atictiuit to tile highest bidder hir cish at die time *11,1 plact· and undrr the terms designated in the iwitre of sale, after public ntillce of the late having pre· viously been given by advertising, weekly, for four consecutive weeks, in a ncw$paper of general circulation in the County where the Property is located and after copies of the notice of sale have been mailed in accordance with the statutcs of the State of Colorado. The Trustee may postpone sate of all or any parcel of the Pro- perty by public an noun cement at the time and place of any previously *cheduled sate, Lender, or Lender': designee, may purchase the Property :t iny tale. The parties further covenant ind :gree i follows: Security Interest - Fixtures. Certain goods are or will become fixtures atiached to the Property. It is intended that the filing of this Deed of Trust will make this Deed of Trust effective asa financing statement filed as a fixture filing within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial Code, The goods covered hereunder are more particularly described herein. Construction Mortgage. Thil Died of Trust constittiti a con,truction Inortgage under the Uniform Commacial Code, given'to secure an obligation incurred for the construction of an improvement on the land demibed above (including the acquisition costs of the land). Ctive,ia„„ i,f 1 ide. 11•irr,iwrr <·„vi·,i.rm :ha, A ,rrower k lawfull v irked of ilic rit m hereby r,inveyed and 1,2 the right to grant and convey the Property, that the P.,perty is uneneuniticred and that Borrower will warrant mil defend gcnerally the title Iii tile Property 42 inst al! claillis and demalt Js, subject w any dect:trilic,11, easement, or restrictions, which are of public record and listed in a schedule of exceptions m coverage in a title insurance policy insuring Lender's interest in the b.· perty. Waiver of Exemptioni. Borrower waives .,1 I right {,1 homeste ad c xcli,ption in lic Properly alid all wher c xeniptions now vested or hereafter acquired, Ci,verants of Borrower. Borrower covenants and agrees ro promptly pay Lender all principal ind interest and all other sums of money payable by virtue of the - Note and this Deed of Trust and to perform ech and every covenant and agreement in the Note, this Deed of Trw, any Construction Loan Agreement with Lender, or anY other Ancurient, reliting Io thr hinn represenic·,1 hy tile Note, including, 1}1/ mil limited to, tile (:<im m tment Letter to Borrower, dated .Febrtary. 19, . 1982 apended .Ma.Fch..12,..1982. i . (i,errili "c „Ii,„„Mient 1.citcr") an,1 11,y Assigil,i,ent „f 1.casct and Rent:. . EL·114 (6·29-82) --7 _1 PROPOSED l</A~- CANVAS 1 i AWNING E ; V'La \ / XI 34>90 \ Vt >r>% 3% 99 / 2- t- -- I KE»a - / I 9 . 1q-*-111 - 1 -I- ~E~ 22 - . 433 222¢=4.-\ .....,194€ =447»*~ - - --7 4 -CX k. 7. 1 . 4 2-=tu Ax- 4 2744«..1 \- .. I I , ·'i:w , ~~~ 42*px . 9-9*74\ -1«\ - . .... .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Neighborhood Character Guidelines DATE: October 13, 1993 I have prepared a map of the exact boundaries of each neighborhood we are including in the guidelines. I would like the committee to review the map (at the meeting) and we can discuss any changes or any "subareas" which you think should be defined. We need to be sure that each area can be justified as an individual neighborhood which shares some particular characteristics and features. In addition, I'd like to continue the discussion we had in August, and try to answer some of the questions which came up at that meeting. Some of the points we might want to discuss are: How will the Guidelines be used? How specific or general should they be? How could we give them strength? (i.e. give some sort of a bonus for projects which comply to them) It seems appropriate to reduce allowable FAR and give some back as a bonus for complying Include a Maintenance section in the booklet Replace a lot of the text with visuals Should we include all the neighborhoods in one book instead of separate pamphlets? How can we make the Guidelines more exciting/interesting/useful? Should we attach zoning maps or state the existing zoning in each neighborhood? What is the direction we want to go? What are we trying to encourage/discourage? dd-v 0/0 " h<\59 / .. .. MEMORANDUM FYI I attended the National Trust for Historic Preservation conference in St. Louis last week, and heard a presentation on a nationwide survey of 1,863 Preservation Commissions. Each commission was asked what their top concerns are, and here are the results (in order of importance): 1. Screen service and utility uses 2. Blend signage with the building 3. Protect established vegetation 4. Decrease the variety of signs 5. Preserve environmentally sensitive areas 6. Respect neighborhood context 7. Consider the existing topography 8. Decrease the visibility of parking 9. Discourage "boxy" structures 10. Offset portions of the facade to break up the building mass .. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of October 13, 1993 building. Jake: Would you approve a solid green awning with writing on it? Roger: Probably but I would defer to Amy on her thoughts. Amy: I am a little hesitant to deny any color and the green proposal would not be as eye catching. Bill: The Board would prefer a solid color. Martha: The presentation was well thought out. Bill: The building is a real attractive building. Roger: It will be a restaurant with movie memorabilia. 232 E. HALLAM - AMENDMENT TO FINAL Amy: Wayne Stryker who represents the Roberts family withdrew their application. 205 S. MILL - CHANIN'S RESTAURANT - AWNING Amy: This is an application for an installation of an awning over the landing at the entrance to the restaurant. I am recommending approval. Roger: This used to be Anguilla's restaurant and there never was an awning at that site. Is this a retractable awning? Jim Terry, Gibson & Reno Architects, representing the Aspen Restaurant Association: It will be a retractable awning and dark green in color with white lettering. We were trying to cover the entire stairway however, due to FAR and open space criteria we have downplayed it. We are now looking at something with a little more public safety and that will cover up the entry. Roger: Did you want to originally cover the stairway from the railing up like a hood? Jim Terry: Due to FAR and there is a current application for an addition on Mill Street Plaza (kids street). Bill: How far out does it come. Jim Terry: Three feet from the face of the building. We can't exceed that. 5 .. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of October 13, 1993 Bill: Is there any proposed signage for the awning? Jim Terry: Currently all the awnings have a small writing on them and I assume the new owner will want to pursue that as well. Jake: Does the awning drip onto the stairs? Jim Terry: It will drip somewhat onto the stairs. We were trying to retain what was Gordons and the Harry Teague design. With historic preservation we were trying to keep the continuity of the restaurant. Les: Is there an existing airlock? Jim Terry: No, you come right into a vestibule. Bill: Jake has a very good comment about the shedding of water onto the stairs and in the winter those stairs are tricky because of the ice. MOTION: Les made the motion that the HPC approve the Minor Development application as submitted for 205 S. Mill Street; second by Roger. All in favor, motion carries. Jake will be the monitor. MOTION: Jake made the motion to adjourn; second by Les. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 6 FROf©SED f »AN\~46 0 / -„\ . -=»=KLI 1 1 , 31 74 r.0 NA 12\ A , 4 i- 0 1 -1 - --r--_ --h~ · «4=64-L .,4. 47 4 it«-h - -1- 4 \ »4 9/NE- 10 -*F - NX:« 22«13\\ ...4 tx f- Uk•/ 6 ' . · .· /1 4 L==u----- 111. 1 A-.6 ......".5: -7 11 - ... \ v r r - 11~ 1 - ...2./:tfe:Mils,9/8/'Wri,b . ; r - /.6*4<0 -/ * : ....................Iite -r . I. b tv ~ Te, -=i=Ttr 06 4 ..=P PN A.Z.VA~~ I; -r al 'A A _El t r- 6 -/64---1- A - \ 11 - ./<671622<7"A.Q/1ilill ; r- - 944 - fillilillilillililill *IM Alli'Fill::ill:I:. ..-- PHOTO OF EXISTING MILL ST. PLAZA -- - Vi i PROPOSED CANVAS AVVWING >62<0>f VE.<JAAS>Kiet'&- / I I - - - ----~gI _ L»- - 432.r/ L__-- ---. --- ESEr; P. %232 --uz~--_ 193»Or-Lan_» 944 2£97«~f»= to r \ \\\ 47- 1 1/10/93 A,NNING ADDITION MILL STREET PLAZA .. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of November 10, 1993 like to see what the difference between three feet vs 4 feet high and what the effect would be. The issues that are critical are lighting and painting it out so it is not so visible. Bill: I feel comfortable with Staff and monitor site visiting and making the decisions. Jake: I can't make the decision as there is not enough information here. Martha: I also agree with Jake that the information of placement in relationship on the roof etc. has not been provided. Donnelley: How high is the parapet on the roof of the building vs. the four foot skylight. Don Westerlind: It should be a 30 inch parapet. Martha: I have a concern with the halogen lights as it is a lot of lost energy. Donnelley: Actually they put out less energy for the amount of lighting. MOTION: Joe made the motion that HPC approve the minor development application for 520 E. Cooper Unit 406 with the following conditions: 1) A monitor from HPC be appointed to work with Staff in addressing these issues; 1) lighting, painting or coloring out, height of the clear story in relationship to the parapet wall, tinted glass or shaded; second by Donnelley. All in favor, motion carries. Martha is the monitor. 305 S. MILL - CHANIN'S Jim Terry, Gibson Reno Architects: This is an amendment to minor development. There are numerous awning in the plaza that do have this new shape. Jake: What is the purpose of the awning? Jim: To get the snow off the entry as they have taken out the vestibule that was there as an entry. They are walking right into the restaurant at this point. Jake: You are proposing that it rise to the point of the roof. Jim: We are trying to match the existing which are at a 45% angle. 5 .. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of November 10, 1993 Bill: The other awnings pertain to the shapes of the storefronts that are there. This restaurant addition was added as a more sculptural effect of this building. It is more industrial and so are the stairs. An awning with an exposed frame would look better. Trying to relate to the awning on the rest of the building would not be appropriate. Possible a steel gray awning one stretch of a piece would be more appropriate. Jake: That awning will only provide a little protection. Jim: Initially we had tried to design a canvas to completely cover the entire stair. That presented problems from an FAR issue. There is no additional FAR because the Mill Street kids is doing an expansion. We are now trying to get as much three foot covering through an awning as we can. Bill: Since they have eliminated the airlock inside this committee frowns on any plastic airlock outside of the building. Jim: I will advise the client of that concern. Jake: I would like to see the awning as flat as it can be. It would be good to not have sides on the awning but have the exposed metal or aluminum. It will also have to be retractable. Martha: I am inclined to approve an awning open specific over the doorway. Jim: We could reduce the height and width if that is more pleasing to the committee. Karen: You need a more industrial awning to match the addition. Jim: If this is going to be denied I would prefer to go back to the client to advise him to keep the original awning that was proposed and approved. Donnelley: Numerous members would like to see the original awning that was approved built. The option would be a minimal and flat rigid covering that would be a horizontal element that just covers the opening and is bracketed off which would express how it is held UP. MOTION: Joe made the motion that HPC table the application to allow a restudy of the proposed canvas awning on the Mill Street Plaza; second by Donnelley. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Joe made the motion to cancel the December 22nd meeting; 6 .. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of November 10, 1993 second by Jake. All in favor, motion carries. MOTION: Jake made the motion to adjourn; second by Bill. All in favor, motion carries. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 7