The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.210 S Galena St.HPC26-97Case : 1122* 16-9 ..tuA 2< 0 6.6-C~levic_ St' B 11*' P A 4 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT AT 210 S. GALENA STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1997 WHEREAS the applicant, B.P.O. Elk's #224 of the United States, represented by Cottle, Graybeal, Yaw, has requested minor development approval for the property located at 210 S. Galena Street. The property is a designated historic landmark and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Amidon, in her staff report dated August 13, 1997, recommended approval with conditions, and WHEREAS, the application was reviewed at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on August 13, 1997, at which the Commission considered and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 4-3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development at 210 S. Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, be approved with the following conditions: 1. Improvements in the City right-of-way must be delayed until final comments are received from the DEPP committee. 2. A (brick) sample is to be provided to Staff and monitor. 3. The design for the planter and how it fits on the east facing wall is to be submitte d to Staff and Monitor for final approval. 4. The design of the light/planter is to be submitted to staff and monitor for final approval. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the day of ,1997. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Chairman ATTEST: Chief Deputy Clerk ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUG. 13. 1997 Chair-person Suzarmah Reid called the meeting to order with Mary Hirsch, Melanie Roschko, Jeffrey Halferty, Roger Moyer and Susan Dodington present. The Commission welcomed new member Heidi Friedland. Excused were Gilbert Sanchez and Mark Onorofski. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Mary Hirsch relayed to the Commission that two more trees have been lost at 303 E. Main and it is an unfortunate situation. Those trees needed more fertilizer and more water and a concerted effort should have been made to retain those trees. The house has had extraordinary changes. Amy Amidon, Planner stated that an agreement was signed between the owner and the city regarding the trees on the city right-of-way and their replacement. Melanie stated that it would be very difficult to get a large root ball into the site of the dying trees due to the constraints. Jeffrey stated at the Paepcke house a year before the excavation a slip/form plyboard was placed into the ground so the roots would move and grow to the side. This process prevents roots from being severed during excavation. That process takes 11/2 years. MOTION: Roger moved to add 132 W. Main and 411 E. Hopkins to the agenda; second by Susan. All in favor, motion carried. 210 S. GALENA 510 E. HYMAN - ELK'S BUILDING - MINOR Amy Amidon, planner stated that the presentation is for the development of the Elk' s third lot which is basically the alley/trash/parking area. They propose to do a park in the vicinity of the elevator and some off street parking and to move the compactor. Bike racks would be added and they are proposing to do some improvements to the sidewalk. Staff is recommending delaying the sidewalk as the DEPP Committee is doing a study as to whether sidewalks should be wider in the core. Staff 1 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUG. 13. 1997 recommended approval with one condition; more information about the flower pots that are to be extended from the historic Elk' s building. Larry Yaw, architect presented. The proposal is to re-create and enhance the entry and in general present a better face to the streetscape. Snow melting the sidewalk area is in the plan. They would like to create seating within the Elk's property, wall off the alley and place a detached bike rack for ten bikes off the west wall o f the Mason Morse Bldg. A nine foot wall would be proposed between the two buildings running east and west separating the parking/trash area. A free standing planter would be proposed and not attached to the east wall. The trees proposed would be high canopy trees to provide shade to those sitting on the benches. Three down lights/planters are proposed for the historic east wall of the Elks bldg. They would be attached through the mortar. Mike Haman, trustee stated that the nine foot wall as indicated on the plans was to separate the seating area like a room and it would cover the top of city hall and you would only see Red Mountain. Some trustees liked the five foot wall as it keeps the area open to the back of the building and is more pedestrian friendly and you would see the dormers and roof of City Hall plus Red Mountain. Commissioners discussed the proposed brick pattern and sandstone. They also had concern about the planter' s closeness to the historic east wall. There was concern about moisture and if a water proof membrane would be used on the interior o f the planter and the appearance of the planter against the historic wall. Other concerns were the wiring o f the lights/planters into the historic wall. All the commissioners felt the proposed development would improve the site. Larry Yaw responded that the wiring would be coming through from the inside of the building out to the existing conduit. The existing conduit would be replaced and painted out. Susan stated that she had concerns about bolts being placed into the historic wall. People should see the wall as old and possibly crumbling as they are 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUG. 13. 1997 historic walls. She also felt the lower wall was more pedestrian friendly as opposed to views being blocked off. Heidi had concerns about the planter obscuring the historic wall. She also stated that the cityscape is important and she is in favor o f the lower wall. Melanie had concerns about the planter and its closeness to the historic wall during harsh weather. She also indicated that the lower wall would be more pedestrian friendly and in scale with the entire proj ect. Jeffrey indicated that the lower wall would be safer in the evenings but either wall would be acceptable. He felt design specifications should be provided on the proposed light/planter. Mary had no problem with the free standing planter but is opposed to the planter/light attaching to the historic building. Roger likes the "room effect" o f the design with the proposed nine foot wall. The lights on the east wall will improve the area. The planter with something in front o f it creates an inner play of texture, color and feeling. Suzannah indicated that the detail of the lights/planters should be provided. She also had concern about the planter against the historic wall. She has mixed feelings about the height o f the wall. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the site plan changes at 210 S. Galena - 510 E. Hyman Ave. Improvements in the City right-of-way must be delayed until final comments are received from the DEPP committee and a sample provided to Staff and monitor with the following conditions: 1) The design for the planter and how itfits on the east facing wall be submitted to Staff and Monitor forfinal approval. A revised drawing as presented tonight be submitted to staff and entered as exhibit VI to the records. 2) The design of the light/planter be submitted to stajfand monitorforfinal approval. Motion was second by Melanie. Motion carried 4-3. Yes vote: Heidi, Jeff, Suzannah, Roger. No vote: Mary, Susan, Melanie. 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUG. 13. 1997 Roger stated that he did not address the idea put forth of a five foot wall. The wall presented is nine feet. Mary informed the applicant that he should make a decision with the trustees and come back to the board and present the changes at the next regular meeting. Heidi thought the proposal to have openings in the upper portion o f the wall was a desired element. Melanie will be the monitor for the Elk's Building. 130 S. GALENA - CITY HALL - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Amy Amidon, planner: The proposal is for two skylights on the north elevation to provide better light and ventilation to the offices on the third floor of city hall. The skylights would be flat against the roof. All mechanical equipment should be painted out. Stan Clauson, Community Development Director indicated that the windows proposed would be velux windows that are hinged at the top. A mechanical ventilation system is being proposed for city hall but would not take place for another two years. Amy added that interior remodeling is also being done and the skylights might have to shift slightly toward Galena Street depending on where the separation walls are placed. A monitor should be assigned to the project. MOTION: Mary moved that HPC approve the minor development proposal for 130 S. Galenafor the two skylights as submitted with the condition that the mechanical equipment on the roof be painted in a dark color that compliments the historic building; second by Roger. All in favor, motion carried. Heidi is the monitor for City Hall. 4 CASELOAD INDEK PARCEL ID #: ~37-182 CASE NO: *HPC 26-97 ./ W ...... :..... ..4 1 .+ ....... CASE NAME: ;Elks Building Minor HPC Review I *.-I. ..../.- PROJECT ADDRESS: i 510 E Hyman Ave Suite 300 .......... DATE RCVD: , 7/28/97 PLNR: Amy Amidon STATUS , . 1 . . CASE TYPE: .Minor HPC Review OWNER/APP: j B P.~ Elk'J $224 of the U. AP ADD/PHN: ~510 E.Hyman Ave Suite 360 925-3516 REP: Scott McHale/Cottle Grayb REP ADD/PHN: *510 E. Hyman Ave. Suite 21 I â€¢ -* ........ FEES DUE: ~125 FEES RECEIVED: t125 I ... -I. .. MTG DATE: 1 REVIEW BODY:- HPC PUB HRG:| NOTICED; . .... - -'ll. . I REFERRALS: t .. DATE REFERRED: 1 I REFERRED BY: ~ 2 DATE DUE: 9 1 FINAL ACTION DATE: 1 BOCC ACTION: t PLAT SUBMITTED: 2 PZ ACTION: PLAT (BK -PG): ; ADMIN ACTION: ; -I ----I. 1. REMARKS: ~ U L MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 0 THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Diffctof~ Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Planning Directo4 01UL) , 11 - FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer ~ RE: 510 E. Hyman Avenue, Elk's building- minor DATE: August 13,1997 SUMMARY: This building is a historic landmark and is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. The applicant proposes to improve the "alley" between the Eli('s Building and Mason and Morse offices, and wishes to install snowmelt in the surrounding sidewalk. APPLICANT: B.P.O. Elk's #224 of the United States of America, represented by CGY architects. LOCATION: 510 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots K, L, and M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units, pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). Response: The Elk's Building occupies 2 of the 3 lots which make up the 9,000 square foot parcel. Lot M, the easternmost part of the property, appears to have only ever had a small structure on it. Today it is vacant except for some landscape improvements, utilities, and the elevator addition. The Elk's are currently unable to make any more additions to the building because, given the fact that the structure is four stories, they are over the allowed floor area for the site. They wish to improve the exterior seating area at the elevator entry, and to provide better bike racks for the building occupants to use. Additionally, they wish to install snowmelt in the surrounding sidewalks, which are the City right-of-way. In terms of the sidewalk, staff finds that no approvals can be given at this time because the City is currently conducting a study through the Downtown Enhancement and Pedestrian Plan (DEPP) committee to examine whether or not downtown sidewalks should be widened and whether neckdowns should be created at corners to allow more room for people to gather and a safer way to cross intersections. This aspect of the project should be put on hold until final comments from DEPP are received. The newspaper racks which the applicant proposes to relocate are privately owned and rented. The applicant must coordinate the relocation with the appropriate group. In terms of the landscape improvements to the site, staff has no concerns with the proposed seating or parking areas, except a recommendation that the flower pots not be hung on the east side of the historic Elk's Building so that the historic masonry not be damaged or obscured. More information as to how the appearance of the empty flower pots in the winter will be dealt with should also be provided. HPC requires a sample of the proposed brick. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed development is consistent with the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal does not detract from the historic significance of the Elk's Building. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The architectural integrity of the historic building will not be diminished. Staff recommends against installation of the flower pots on the Elk's Building. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the site plan changes at 510 E. Hyman Avenue, except for suspending flower pots from the east wall of the historic building. Improvements within the City right-of-way must be delayed until final comments are received from DEPP. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the site plan changes at 510 E. Hyman Avenue, except for suspending floweryots from the east wall of the historic building. Improvements within the City right-of-way must be delayed until final comments are received from DEPP. A sample of the proposed brick must be provided for approval by staff and monitor." . ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name El-Ks *u,u),44 81-rE AfVEL-FMENT *po ~85T-Fic.1-1*i<:~ 2. Project location 510 E. HYMAN AVE Suic 300 , As,ENI (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 6 0 4. Lot size 40 ' i \ 09 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 'Br.0. ELÂ¥25 #224 0% ng 66,00 37>,14 *#186<4 eD c. H'6.*N me- Sutle 3<v (970- 92.9- 351(o~ 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number ixÂ« Me,*Alâ‚¬ ~ (>Frl.â‚¬, 42*Â¥60- ~W #00*1 . 60 E Â· HYA,4 Al/6 Ju 1TE- 1,1 ~ 8?mo 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) PLAZA Ago IS BILST,44 69*nâ€¢)64 ~ Lk.03(â€¢0/MA J 5,KIr FACK ~ i j Bl.b4. Ejwl*doe . A{,1,4 15 /Ker(~14 #Â£ Del,lue,Li AND R/BLIC USE. 9. Description of development application 10. Have you completed and attached the following? $ Attachment 1- Land use application form * Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form W Response to Attachment 3 A Response to Attachment 4 11111111 . I I ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name FbK5 601'Uw# g trE Dtf VELâ€¢,F'~EN -r *,0 VW.r- Pocc~-- ~PAâ‚¬ 2. Project location 610 E. HYMAW AVE S,1 ,-rer ZOO 1 ASFER (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning 6 6 4. Lot size 10 1 g. \ 00 1 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number B.F.o. El-Â¥25 #22# 0, 774- 66â„¢0 3714 p,A#t<<4 5\6> 8. H'6AAN Aut, 5uffâ‚¬'300 (~970- 92.â‚¬- 35 lfo~) 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number ip<,rr Vul,Le ~ (}frfug (11*fee*u 4'J Nle.*l , Slo E Â· \WW+ AUG Ju iTE 1-l l kptâ‚¬) 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) FlkiA Ago 15. Elt(1-r,44 sen.)4 ~ LkpDOCAO/NG ~ 5,KIr FACK ~ 1 i Bl>4. &42*dot . ALLUY 15 EK/57(*4 6.,t, Debfu,*f A.0 Pu 6 L. f C- us g. 9. Description of development application 10. Have you completed and attached the following? $ Attachment 1- Land use application form * Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form y_ Response to Attachment 3 A_ Response to Attachment 4 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: 3,7. O. ELKS 1*22# op â„¢ {06,111, 9101% â€¢Fr Apie,acA Address: 510 E. Hi MA,4 Auu Svere <2,00 19 eA Zone district: 6-OMME:Â£46't-- 6=2 (6 .c, b Lot size: 90' 1 1 Do / Existing FAR: Allowable FAR: Proposed FAR: Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: Accesorv bldg: Proposed max. height: Princioal blda Accessory bldg: Proposed % of demolition: Existing number of bedrooms: Proposed number of bedrooms: Existing on-site parking spaces: On-site parking spaces required: Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: Front: Front: Rear: Rear: Rear: Combined Combined Combined Front/rear: FronUrear: FronUrear: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Variations requested: (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage vaMance up to 5%, height variations underthe cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) + f 6 7%. t. , -2 4- \ ' < 5 2 -44442.. \ . k P . * 42'Â« 'Mountain View Dr'&3 â‚¬% *.--- .3. '45 .:-1 4) t Rd 5 (reLL 11* --/ 3089 , . ''664.4 :.. % 40 . pi i '\~riowpunny Ct t 1- e . th... SBIvatign -944Â«179/~ ~lb.â‚¬rm,t Bagik 9 -4, <- .' 06 ~ ' Aspen ... _ '.#.46, e A 00 9 1-,9 , Instilute -~-- ---~+ v c ~~ i~~ ~~ - Aspen 04 2, i f 'b jk e A j.2 1 2 2,5 w. Reertrlg,1 i .1 1 ~re< R ~ .' <f Music + 1 ....1,6 + Not all roads ing bÂ¢ shown or i.ained un inup '-;6* ~''O~ ~'~ ~~~CZZ; E *v r : x C i/ Tent '~,f<twpod Di,ck Ln ~. 0~ 1 ~ 41.2 .7 . 16 1 ,9/Uttlp,/5 so lipl\.am ' 5. SITE Â£ O '/ U 182L '4* & 9 1* 1 07 listed in ima euid:. Some roddi in.ly Le 4% 43 Loc*TION privaw, propunc~ or tinder con,Irumon Golf Coursre -te Â· Â· .5-4 f ' 4 0 r -- -:i k Â£ t .... ,- .. Â¥91Â«St i 6 j u.Â· Vine St pu:d frÂ»4 7,# 4 ; <l C 2 .,.A 2Â»-Â»42 1-0 t.Â· . 1 r..... , i Liwt 0 0Â« 2- 4-61-4 6. 957.~32 ...5 -Â«-p---/*,1 8.- \94 ;3Â§9 11. t. ..I-,t i .~--# % 2-/Â· 4 T-- -~*ff-1,.-*ti#0--15--3 2 1#7 f~ ~rre;416;5~ fit,}24 Maroon Creek Rd 1 /--' ' f .-0- - \Â· ,-' -** 1 --a;-1'4.1 ;Â·@ 1292Â«4 ~~X S 6 ' L[lesouthâ€žAKÂ©Â·t.flÂ©{3t< 9 C 7... - ~*44- / Ctil>% D 5,&, \%..7 -"4-9,+ 41 -'- /-7'447* <: a* st k ., . - f ?f E 9 4. rÂ¥ ; b.-.0. 60 82 3 .4, ' % 2% %49 .ve te ....c , '; 6 Maple Lri......G-6,( C. *)7'Â·Â·â€¢-1, b , 9 l e 2 . CHOSP - 1 Â· M.iroll ,i...11...3 44.4, 1.. F'.Â»445)44, f 4/~ 6~ 4-.* 4 >4*4.,Â·*E& 4' ' e t.v , 9 , .45; 2- 3>4 l- k \ Mu,oon Ci. Di . ...... F-1 -9-- - 4 ; f'.- ...4 f , 4/ <25: *'4~/8,7 A, Alarcor, 1..,A: ' N . '01 , Mwaiti ('A Rd.... G.il-1-2 '' 77'#--~67,1 / 2% 7 ' 0 * - ''44* : PrlinrOSS.j~th .40' Â·.-Â· :4-~,0~4',. Maichk" IM . GÂ·}1-6 L.,..-v <Â· f . cv"9% & 0 ~Â·' dij. & .. .41.91,/7 St -,4 8#91/1/ s> ,Â«F '04 Mayfitiwer Ct. }J.J.- Th.O)/ I ~iÂ©,4 6-K> " e'~~.2 4 ' ~.%0% ~'-â‚¬4 '*~ *~ '4b - - ,4 -~ful#b#Â·c:r 1 Mcad<,uÂ· D:.... 041.2 000)(%96,4342. 4..CO'Hoe 21... f M.Skitimng 12.. ....~ H.1-7 ...H-2.3 blcuck,wi kd.. .F-G-3 fÂ°~St er--4923 Mall 927-2 f -44Â»ff , 1. i , 2,"-'.N * 1 2, i k Ok. /~C' ...~.....~.. Â£-4-5 Midland AÂ·.. ...11-6-, Â·# * e 4 Larkspur Ln * ED~Afw~~ 1.7 Munarch Sl a . Oli ,/ste ~ ~cs.; Mil! Si ...... qklmming Aid Acne G PiÂ·Â·Â· .H,6-7 ,franciâ€¢ SL , ... G-3-6 .. Â§,t,47,+ re 46 4 vurari?CA,JI~A.,yi A.it. Ai.. .10-6 hcd.im...............9.., ....]-6-7 : } /2 ff Â·~ ' e ,;.grj < ~1~Laurc~ (fi [)1 ... +~1-1-J~-~E . #' .... -1.. 7,<.'...1 t W f Alice LE........ ..~..}1.7 FUe Silver Cl. Min Ouls K H.2 Summit'St -t* 4-609*./ â‚¬7Â£ V Alta Visui DE ... ..F.2-3 Gatent, Sl..... , 11.3 hcuic AI.. c -1 C ~e ~ ~2853*p 'Â·~Â·Z ~ -2,1, Aturnore Ch. L)!. " ~11-6 i ......}1-7 Garin,â€¢ch St.,, Â·Â·6-11-4.3 2.T:z 1:~cpi....., ..Cli IIi 2't:21 2.0-. ""~~~ ..GH.-3 Crr~~t'~.~ ~"Â·46.-% R.â€ž I,r .... .'~...ii*3461~..M '08 O. Nich(,lus 1.r... .. 0-6-1 2 9 0% Ii-Â¥~.3 1 {Uplid#ove F..3-4 't ~2~t,49\681'i _42 L..8,1.2 0,43 y~ barnard Pan Cl.. ...G--, Gillespie Sl. ...F-4 Oak Ln...,.. .06 Riverside A.......,4... ..H-6 V J . - ... .901 X /,4, ba; S......................... O-6 Grove St.,... }1-2 original 4. It-1-6 ktvorâ€žd: 1-)f.... .~1-6+0' ' 'L Die; PI "~ 9 %~ 6Â«tpÂ·,91*Â·MÂ·g,lf i ,23 bcriticti bench Ci. Pl, Rd. .....E-4-5 }latjam St..... ..6-3-5 0,Â·crlwj. In. ...EÂ·3 kuarnig h,iL Di.i. 1-7 Â· 68~>3?01~, ~'~F~34~222-25-1~ f -, E B jack Birch D: . ..E-F-2.3 Hcalher Ln. G.H.2 Park Ai. Clf . ..11-6 ki,ating ForA Rd. ...0-4-3 h Biccker S...... ......C;-3-$ 11(nun Hotiow P.Wl St... ...1--4 kilb Cl.... I E. Biecker M.... ..GÂ·11Â·5-6 Holden DC...+ 4,. . 6-3 P.ck ka., ,-~"-E>6 ' 3 Abir, Di.. ..G-6 BlucDorinct Tr... ...}1.2 Homcitake Di.. .........E-2 1''ti."> ........ E-F-4 349 Ch .... 4 L.2 Spq.nb' S L. ..G.H..5 Â¢ . \ 1-11 I brown LY... ..10.0 11(,pkin> A\... .C,-11.3-6 Pitkni blew Di... ..r).E.2 Sâ€¢Iv.u,)1, C-li. .L-2 Spnite.St . .G 6 a : bunnv Ln........... ..E-2-3 Hunter S . ......115 Place Li............. .... P f Saw Mill Cl... .. .GÂ·Ii Suir,111 St... ..11-5 Chillr Crcel D:.. .........F.3 Hunicr Crcck kd. .E-F-6 \*i 14'wa Pliuu ku. . F-6-j Scianic St........ ..6-}1-7 [cul G... ..... 6 6 ~41 1 12 o k S Cusljc Lrick Rd.... ....G-J-i-.4 Hyman A.... ...G-11-4-6 Pninrosc hit.... ./1-2 St,adowood b:. . . 1-J-74, 'Ic,b> L .... .. ..... ..,-, ........11-3 ,Â·*C ' 4 4 -2,4 2 2 h Ccruennia] Cir. ...1-6-7 juan St. ..H--4-5 Puppy Smith Sl... G.3 Shad, Li... .F-G. Trusic,Li PM...... E-F-1-2 / 6 ' [82" Ch:Ific Id Ro . 4 King 51......... Pyramid Rd. ...F-1 5/,0,(Ci...... ..0-6 'Am Kidve Dr . :......__....11.2 Circuit A, ...... Lacci Ct. Li, H -1-6-7 Oucclj St.. â€ž11-(1 Sil.Â·cr King 11. ..E-2 Ulc A\Â·. Pi. Cleveland Si. ....~.11-6,/ 4/01â€¢C *..,... , F-04 kace 51.......... ..~.6-( Sitinti,mt Lit ,.. 0.,,... ........11-7 Vitic 1...... ...G-6 04 Cooper AL....... ...}14-' 1-arkhpul Lit.. ..HÂ·) Red buile Dn....... I)Â·E-:-3 5,nugglcr St............... ./.6-.5.3 Wainul M... .. G-p 444 - '- Cononwood G.. . ...EN hurel Ln , . ....11.2 kcd Moutitam Rd.. Smut,ter Grove Rd......... .....H-6-7 WEBAi..... .. 1-Â¢1 4 , Cononwood Liu. Lume hne kij. ... 0-5.6 Rcd 6 kd . ..1)Â· E-4 -6 bmutl?la Mouniain Rd .. ~EÂ·1Â·1-6-6 Mat End fi. .11-1 b C,yil.; Lake kd.. ,,.., Luvine [j:....... ijb Rel'ent M.i.... H.6-7 biturt. St.. .....11Â·5 vâ€¢'Ch,VIC. Ih..... .... 1Â·9-b 1/UJupeN(hÂ·/NEÂ· Pin~ Dok 5. ...11.11 Mugninco Rd... ......... Â£.4 R'Jec PL Rd . . . ..~ E-f Sneaky Li,............. ..F-G-3 W'||â€žuvi|b) W) . .11-F. 3, 1----~ [kâ€¢n h..... Mion M. ."Glb~4 RIO Gial,d: I'l... ...(i-11.5,6 Snow bun.) (1 . i.Â· 3 Wilylit Kil -E , f ~ 10 ,/Astkro f: A A Â¢11 A 1&Â£1Â£1 COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW July 22,1997 Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Elks Building Site Development and Vest Pocket Park Dear Commission Members: On behalf of the Board of BPOE #224 we are submitting for your review a site improvement plan comprised of three primary elements: (1) Perimeter sidewalk resurfacing and snowmelt. (2) Reorganization of the North (off-alley) service area (refuse, parking, maintenance/operations area) including resurfacing and snowmelt. (3) Creation of a new vest pocket park. The walking surface of the perimeter sidewalks is designed to continue the washed aggregate and troweled concrete theme of the sidewalk pattern existing on Hyman Avenue from the Mason & Morse Building around the Elks Building perimeter and terminating at the alley bounding the north property line of the Elks property. See site plan. attached. The reorganization o f the off-alley service area will include visual blockage of the existing "alley way" connecting Hyman Avenue to the alley, reorganized parking, new trash dumpster location on property, reg-ading for drainage and handicap access to the Hard Rock Cafe. The surface will be troweled concrete snowmelted to avoid snow accumulation in the physically "tight" service area. The "centerpiece" of the Elks site enhancement program is a new vest pocket park off Hyman Avenue between the Elk's and Mason & Morse buildings. This outdoor space is intended for the passive use o f the general public, building tenants and members of the Elks Club. Conceived as an "urban room" or "eddy space" o ff the sidewalk pedestrian flow this vest pocket park is furnished with sitting areas, "urban landscaping", bicycle storage and is intended to serve as an outdoor "vestibule" to both the Elks Building and the neighboring Mason and Morse Building. A primary attribute o f the proposed design is visual closure to the existing through block "alley way" by a brick wall matching the brick o f the Elks Building stairtower. 47---- . 510 East Hyman Averue Sulte 21 ASPEN, 00 81611 tel 970 925.2867 fax 970.925 3736 e-mail.Â· 7926 67@compuserve.corn / / PO. Box 3507 107 N Fir St TELLURIDE, CO 81435 tel 970 728.3037 fax 970.728.3236 e-mad: 703711.605@compuserve.com I.- - J I . Aspen Historic Preservation Commission July 23, 1997 Pace 2 ib Landscaping is conceived to be o f a flowering plants character within raised brick planters (in back of new bench seating), deciduous shade trees with a 10-12 ft. high canopy and new metal flower pot brackets integrating a down light component. In addition to creating sun and shade seating opportunities, the tree canopy and wall brackets are designed to create a night time "room" of a lower and more friendly scale. Bicycle storage, while somewhat visible behind a planter wall for security purposes, is designed to be a subordinate feature. The ground surface will be a herringbone brick paver surface designed to "bring together" the Elks and Mason & Morse Buildings into a singular urban park entity. The new seating benches with divided wood seating surfaces is proposed as similar to the existing benches. The plan also proposes relocation of the existing newspaper vending containers located in front of the vest pocket park to the west along Hyman Avenue. We believe this proposal represents a significant enhancement to Aspen's central core "city scape" and look forward to your comments. Very truly yours, A Larrf-Ya ,FA Jul-25-9/ 09:46A Ihomas O Hines UVM 1-- - Aspen Elks Lodge * -24 510 East Hyman #300 -Aspen, CO 81611 Lodge 925-9071 Office 925-3516 City of Aspen July 25,1997 Historical Preservation Committee 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Committee Enclosed are the General Submission Requirements 1. BPO Elks #224 of the IJnited States of America 5 ]0 E. Hyman Avenue, Suite 300 Aspen, CO 81611 970 925-3516 970 925-8678 (fax) The following are the authorized representatives that may act on behalf of the applicant. Thomas D Hines D.V.M. Mike Logsdon Aspen Elks Lodge #224 Aspen Elks Lodge #224 510 E. Hyman Avenue 510 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 8161 I 970925-3516 970925-3516 Larry Yaw Scott MeHale Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects 510 E. Hyman Avenue 510 E. Hyman Av enue Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 8161 I 970 925-2867 970 925-2867 William Graves Aspen Elks Lodge #224 510 E Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 8161 1 Sincerely, crn_16unvo t~Â«4--_ Thomas D Hines D.V M. Treasurer/Asset Manager STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT Order No. 00023916 PREPARED FOR: 9999900 STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. HEREBY CERTIFIES from a search of the books in this ofice that title to: Condominium Units 1, 2, 3, and 4, B.P.O.E. CONDOMINIUM, according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded in Plat Book 24 at Page 26 and as defined and described by the Condominium Declaration for the B.P.O.E. Condominium recorded in Book 621 at Page 936 and Supplemental Declaration recorded in Book 633 at Page 564. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, appears to be vested in the name of: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A COLORADO NON-PROFIT CORPORATION and that the above described property appears to be subject to the following liens: 1. NONE EXCEPT any and all taxes and assessments. EXCEPT all easements, rights of way, restrictions and reservations of record. This report does not reflect any of tlie following matters: (1) Bankruptcies which, from date of adjudication of the most recent bankruptcies, antedate the report by more than fourteen (14) years. (2) Suits (mci judgments which, from date of entry, antedate the report by more than seven (7) years or until the governing statile of limitations has expired, whichever is the longer period. (3) Unpaid tax liens which, from date of payment, antedate the report by more than seven years, Although we believe the facts stated are true, this letter is not to be construed as an abstract of title, nor an opinion cd title, nor a guaranty of title, and it is understood and agreed that Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc., neither assumes, nor will be charged with any financial obligation or liability whatever on any statement contained herein. Dated: June 30, 1997 at 7:30 A.M. , at Aspen, Colorado STEWART-TIllsEOR ASPEN, INC. Authorized Signature '-Il '15 1 - 4. 4---- 6111/LAR. 824<51<1 602-f*q; FAVEn-5 - . ..1 : : 1..Â« 11. ~ , j~~4~~ -Ii"~.1529./*- ... kil , ' , 1 ,â€žP' 1- r ''11" * 4 1.. 1 1 1 -aw'.~1 .1,4.-3 i .~~~~~~~~JA~A~/#IA It>%1'K 1-191... -d , 0 -1,1,11111 ' 1,Al.:. 9....=1%1'Ut , N. 40 ' 7 s,gda '1//p/N/*&,1//#Vlb.11-90. 011[ ill'1111'111Â» Â»1(INI'll'~1'MI, . 9 1,1,4,4 4 142 -C zi:*'i~* a li~Â°11 'r '11,4 . m:,1, . . 1 11 1. 0 J 1 I St A~ C L.AC '+JodD pÂ«TE*(Al-5 -L FOR- Se NCAASS , -/ 4 + f I .Â· \'6 - -illililli 1%11.- y ..a \'. %. . J'14 1 111.1 1*111 1,2,~ - ~ 1 ~~ .Â£~ 1.lit~A ' 44, . M .~ r 11 11 01., i Â· Wr' . 14!11 A- . i#M .. 'f , . p -9,4.-Ille .. 1 1 1 6.4' ..,â€¢tap'"'F'. m~ 1 - 4.1 1794.*. 4.3.-* N- rieÂ¥- 6 - .,U , m - , â‚¬.. 1 1.911 91, 1 1,4 1 . 144 1 ..1-.4 1 111 16 ~ /1, - ... ..1.&11" . I . .. . 1~fit 33$/Rvoy/UB< __//r- h . I .- ~ 11,11 Il' '|M ' - -A % L %.A ' 41:,9, % '*84,6 ...=.'- . 1 17--1 1 . fal.i . 41 1 ......illillllil 1,+1//,1 - r.. 9 .1 -1 1 .11*16 6 - 1 1,1 1 A J Â· p 7 , , â€¢ 1 .JI J',41 - %,1 , ... 1 1 ' '' I I UP 1, 0.0.?./.kill .' ./ . - ' - EAL - 'ECTS - 'MAN - I1611 3867 1736 FIR ST. '0. 81435 - 3037 - 3236 1 Â· . Â·' - C.... 21'JIN NIEU,1 -AVE , 1 \\\ . /Ii â€¢ 14'-6. AFF, 3 -0" PROM - 1.OSE BIS ---'4 SNOWMEL~~j FLOOR PLAN EDGE OF BLDG. .: f ~,% 7 " .1 '. I. t. - - i...~..., ':.,-0.Â·Â· : 7&4'..:w - \\t~ CONCRETE 6 Â· / 62 AREALUAI GRATE FIRE NOSE SIB - NEW FLANTER -1 1 ~fLEEGATE \\\\ i\ 4 -4-42 P,el.ENT'r LINE - DRAWN BY: ESP' 1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK l i 1 1 /9\ CHECKED BY: ~ < LAMP POSTED 1 SCALE: 1/B",1'40' b) r'---------------7 1 89!CK PAVERS L Â© NEW LOCATION OF \ / *APER RECEPTACLES - 0/ .: * NEW TREE HYMAN AVENUE 1 y 4 ~ PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN N0RT4 ~ 1 0 , SCALE: 1/B"â€¢1'-0" - 'pÂ©Ii, ..- 0 19% COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW ARCHITECTS er - v.- , 0 -I- anNEAV NVIAH 18Â¥2 0,9 1.1 00- J.71). , "Mullâ€¢- W 1*Wiu ". .. C. A. 1 1 Oil ,I. I 1 0, 11 1 1 11 ; el ; - I . . -I . ... . . .. . 2 â€¢C .. - -- ! . - n 4 12 1, 1 1 - "... 1 1 . 1 / , 9 . , . , . ,) . -., . - - 4 , i > 1 47' I:......'Â·,%,.....i. .-'I Me. , , - COTTLE - GRAYBEAL - Â·,XI ... I I. . I - YAW 1 - I ... I AX,0-...., -.:.. GAP BUILDING Â· 99<' -' ,Â·Â·rÂ·r ~ Â· , - ARCHITECTS - . 0..Â· - . >:99. f - v A , - . - - LTD _ 510 EAST HYMAN I I ASPEN, CO. 81611 - P (970)925-2867 - F (970)925-3736 P.O.BOX 3507 107 NORTH FIR ST. - TELLURIDE, CO. 81435 - - P (970)728-3037 ALLEr - F (970)728-3236 MgOMENTÂ¥ LNE LAMP POSTO -1--- r .1 AANÂ©\CAP RAMP : AREALL,ar -~ Â· -- r - GAS METERS ' . - ELECTRIC 3 =r=Ly-4 7.. 1 -1 til ..2 ..Lil a . ..1 0 I. . - I - ~Â·Â· Â·-... .. ' . I * UP --- ... I . 1 . 1 I .'' , ..24 . I . , \4.- I j -=1 O * SEWER . \ - MASON & MORSE '' 04 BUILDING 01 * - %:8 ELKS BUILDING 510 EAST HYMAN AVE. 011'W Z2& 1.1.04 ALLEY I I . 21 UWN,AMEE) 1 ISSUE: 7/25 11 {iEE! REVISIONS: 1 CONCRETE SIDEWAL< 4 - 5610Â©11&61- -I ' p6-ANTEf \ k' .- V.. -/7-1, 2 '3 .h , . FIFQE MOSE BIB\,X~~ ... . h - 1 .alk .: f â€¢+OSE SIS - 4~ 'F FLOOR PLAN 51(3N ABOVE - ,452. Nit, 4 5/ NElEI 1 AGGREGA'E rm-AREAWAY GRATE ,#REE MOSE BIS---=(.__.-4,Â·v CONCREIE LI#/ 12-< 1 1 BRIC< PAVERS ~ 1 /17 .11 1 CN .- '16â€ž#14,Â¥ LINE ~ 1 1 1 - i -re DRAWN BY: Est- CONCRETE Fl 2 1 . l. 1 1 CONCRETE (& SIDEWALK CONCRETE ; SjOEWALK 4 . Â· '-- *F-- : /-* -'-N. SIDEWALK CHECKED BY: LAMÂ© POSTO ~ r--Â©7 ' - 4 Â©-1 - ~- ~ SCALE 1/B"Â·=1'-0' 0 84*c< PAVERS . 0 ~ 1 J â€¢ApER REAE- 1 1 j ..4 / HYMAN AVENUE 7 AB.1~ 'i NORTHI /-h EXISTING SITE PLAN j (1) - SCALE: 1/8"â€¢1'-0" 9 19% COTTLE GRAYBEN YAW ARCHITECTS 11 , iMMEN'\ 9 - 1NBMd013Aaa 31IS DNIallne S)!1 >IHVd 1 tli-iD 1 30!iNG ~*1 ~' AP#jw~%1Â·WM,Â·*L. *%-121 - L . 26565#1:ma 1. - . - . . 1-f--- ''.~.... ......A-<t.- - .. ... , ' .. 4 I .3. - Â·Â· , ./ I - COTTLE ..... - GRAYBEAL - - YAW 1 r'' ..f' :.'. ./. .... I x.~. . ...'ATHEGAP ~4,:':,<.2:.~w, **,U -ARCHITECTS - ' **:.4 - LTD . I I A-::-- - ./ '1.-1. f .... I . Â· "Â· 4 . _ 510 EAST HYMAN , ASPEN, CO. 81811 P (970)925-2867 - F (970)925-3736 - P.O.BOX 3507 107 NORTH FIR ST. - TEUURIDE, CO. 81435. - - P (970)728-3037 - ALLEY - F (970)728-3236 - | F'*OPE*Tr .NE LAMP 9061 0 . 1 1 1\\ t. - h WANDICAP EAMP V e. .. . I NEW AREALLIAT COMPACTOQ LOCATICV I GAS METERS .Â· - .. , , ELECTRIC 1\ /1 ~ TRANSFOR<*ER 1 i X 14 1 1 'W-.- I-- -6.0, %.1 1 / 1 1 / . u U, \ 11 4 / NEW PAVING 4 SNOWMELT Â· -rE' ..r:.--L N - w.- -727 1 -1 - U. - ..9. -FVT * . 1,1 1 - . 3. , 'J.94 . \IrsM g- I , I -*410/ -r I I 1- r 1 Â· r. ' MASON & MORSE 1... .. . K ., 42.--- U;252 g- BUILDING 0 0 W ZO< I <Ch..\ 1 'f ' \-1 li . - (6 / ~ /,/1/1/0- CÂ·Ar' 1 .'4 . i. 9>1<-, . :i . 1 , \\ 4 X illlÂ· .!li .ll' - 1 I ELKS BUILDING ii Â· 0 0, o L U. Â· 7 01 4 1 1 ... -- -- ide 8 1 I ./ I ' 1 - ... - I 1 , . 3%Â·.BIKE ~ --- 39 0 1 UNNAMED ISSUE: 1/26/91 Â· REVISIONS: - 7- 7-' * 71 bi I >23,Â£0 1 [3-LLNEW BWERS ALL- ' . '1*Mflt.grjd 1'>FS ...4 T NEW P~-ANTER''~ 1 ki . 4 ELKS SIGN LOCATED Â® 14'-6' AF= 31-0,1 1=eaM r--4 1 ~I ~~~ ,~Â·Â«==:* EDGE OP BLDG MOSE BIB ~ ' FLOOR PLAN SIGN ABOVE - Ull '.12Â» 1-mao._ .....t'. 1 CONCRETE W/ ~2...AREAWAY GRATE . FIRE +OSE SIS----253-2 ;2: Â· Â·Â·7-' p ~ .' C ' Â·0': . ' AGGREGA'E 91 2, \1 j.. I \ i Â· 4*O0ENTÂ¥ LINE ; 1 1 1. , 1 .-111=N i DRAWN BY: Est- , .1.. I 4 1 NEW SiDEWALI< ~ CONCRETE 4 SNAUJMELT '' SIDEWAL< CHECKED BY: 1- I. ~ LAMP POSTED / r-91 7 f 4-1 1 1 7 01% 1 Â® 1 ) (~) 1)- . 94,411.E: 1/B"=P-0' \ 1 5 1 I is~ ~ S~CK PAVERS < It---------------1 , Ji----------------J 1 NEW LOCATIC,10. \ 1 5 4__,.,4-r~7--K 44--,>f PAPER IECE-TACLES- NEW TREE HYMAN AVENUE Â£ GRATE 1 AB .2 ~ ~ PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN NORTN SCALE: 1/8"â€¢1'-0" +70& 1. 0,1996 COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAV ARCHITECTS ~~-~ 9 . 8/#9-10 ~.11 Apl 11~1111 JLNEWd013Aaa 31IS )Illyd 131 GALENA yllill111111 9 NVIAH 18Â¥3 29 'tt .4 t f.' 1 1 1 1 1 It 8 + - 41 -- IL. - 0 k f Z. 4 2 1 , (3 Â·miF 1-k e j k. ~41=.14 ---: = ~ f f ' 1 r 77 497-Â· -Â·- -A.JÂ¥ 6- ,zly F 81 1[1---- -1 .7 + - - .7 . t\.1 \ u r .1 1 .1 !T ~ . i r_ 13 L,.... _,j I. / i ! ; -7.7~#:7* 4.+- Â¢4 4 1\ 1 i 4 i LL_ - ~---4 Uvr- 4 1 F: 1 '1 . --11 1- 1 121 9 9 E pi R. I -11 / 1.1 i. 0% , 1,/4/ j 1 1 14 r-L.Â« r '' 1 \f 7 6 i \C i i â€¢ 4: m 1,0 c -4 7 1 'Â· 1/2 - 11 I , 54,4 - .t ' 'f ' IM, 4 G.1 1 1 R 20 2_47. , Â· + - , 1 . 9 0 -- 1} 1 19-7 OR,lit h R K ' 1 IP K Z 1 /7 r, i Â· F~*1 1 2,21':.i J,4.4.6. t.- -_~_-~~~ 4~ L < u.90 '... O â€¢Â· U- i r h /1 BAN 1-1 [.-1,- Ul; 4. 4.774 1.r'-% 4--i Â¢ 1 Â·-.1~_. \ ... ,/ T r.,1\....V #li.. 1 , Tr' V 91'1 _ 74 - Eff- -4 ir Ii, ? 44-.V ---,1 -3 1 1 i Iii 1 44" Â· 1 1 1 It / 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1. / 1 4% 4 j. t !In NIEWBELICE L.14 L.L. 3 - & 11 '10â€¢, -9.- -4--'6 L-43 6 7-1 f & +1 - :7=1 .' ;. fipÂ¢ 7 -1. :LD ... 44 rf 2 --4 *24. T-% a . Z \1 N . P- *Fl.: _ "1* - Â·Â·71- --11 I n r 0 4 . /. '1 6 2# *~:..i.r 7, y 44 9 ' /9 t, t.- 4 L . t' -- 4-~-4 - LIE! N 6 4 . Â»:~3& z .4.98 - - 47&-h#hi 427 d ? 4, 4 - it: I . 1 1 B...Â·k. r Ip E r 1 713-77[L Â· L 171 - / A m m "' 1@7'!!11. IN '1 9 M . IN . 2 r < 27 11 k:Q Â¢ 4 L.-1 4 . â€¢,7 4 71 i.v ). 1 -1 -71 '1 z .I / 1 049 g Â£_--4 4 09_1 F 2:--- - - No '. ~ ..43 ; ~i U El f Â»1 + r-Ir 1 r, Â· , 4,:p 1" 1 .4 1 E- 1 91 -.3.- f \ 11 V / 4 42 Â· 4Â®Â· --.-1 ; 1- . ..0.-I- f 9441:21-4, 1- \ 2191.--1 ..h, h I J, 1 t)-rÂ· :y' , V I 141 < \\ Et , . \ b 3 - I 2-, Ul --4 Â©3 z , 90 4 1 1Â¢4 1 - 5 IF ELE'J~i.=.I l'rfÂ·-: 'f. / // l~ 1 t.. 1 9-1 .r- I u / Â·. Z 4 1 . 4Â§ , Â· ,-117 .5 4,1 ~'t r" Â£-, 7. T ~ 4 iki j 41 5 1 v A v k. td 9 4 L 2-4,-14#i~tic_ IP; -\ U.J~u/~ --771 d f 4/%/3 - , 9 4 J. I Ft 146Â£Â· <44=.pr - 1 f & : *1.1 r*-11 '/ Â· , '22 671 /24!' 11 4 46 j 1 47 --'1~Â¢=--4152 .:Fil K .i.-/ 7,1 -1 + ler. 7 -6.i -'.- f 4 ke I C . 1 m v 19 1 C lA ~~1 f.\ 1 : :.1 I K H .9,1 i .P IÂ·t li;tilt i.. i 1 1 1 . \\ - ' 'iÂ·-4~ 7, 1 k.\ m Ill 1 /- tx .. , 42 j 71 1 1 1, On ( 4 i 4/~ 1} -~ a' - 9 1, , . I.9 71 1 1 0 -Â©~Â·~ 'r 1 , . 1 41# . [< k HER 8.Ret 1,4414 4, - 1 1 - 1 CE' /1'-c>Â·' t/- it: Â». 1 <,1 r , i. 41 ; Â· Pl f 9 i t: i 4 7/*AS 9 ... +I 3- 4,64â‚¬ 1 ..4* 1 \ 1-7-1 1\ "1'.r edLE--1 FL E b__. ELKS BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT 0@mrn 0. P ~ = 7 @CCE 04& 41 AND VEST POCKET PARK Â§8 *E W ~ -| 0 4 N 202 - Mr. - 5135,3 M :iM1 510 EAST HYMAN AVENUE 858 n .4 ASPEN, CO M m -i - - I 1111111 Illl'lll'll'Illn NOI 1-VA 2 13 [Â·Â£L> - k 1 7- M '41 a H U 35Â« 1~~ip#:.~â€ž Yrial_LYÂ»21-12