The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.HP.210 S Galena St.HP-1989-16/1 210 S Galena - Elk Bldg (/C,$â‚¬- 41 :g -*/41-1 -__2737-182-13-001-81~~Ck (1Â¥ . A Al?09 _lyj L o 07 pwik /r- j 1 41- -- -~-= -- 1,23 - I /'A +t '1/0~.1- *1 7.1.-Y , 3G9 PROPERTY NAMEÂ· ELIa PUDG LOCATION. ago â‚¬ CRAia A- ' SLOCKIL(37 94- -, KL PHOTOGRAPHER, D'ATE 3 191*Mleen , 7/90 FACADE ORiENTATION; l~ CAMERA DIR.ALE FILM ROLL & FRAVFÂ· lott + 1 - - - . ---- 11llillivilill~lillilifillillillilimifil~ililip t 42 Â£ 1 / b .S 47 0 . , L/,1.-44.. X /911.Z 7~ e. . HC) PKIN 5 I. ' V'-. 1 / CD 4 4 1 ,-1 1 1 241311''f-4-17-1~ c 27912.2 -1 Ix i C/ leÂ£,44 21*50,4 <1 bÂ» 4 -~ 1 \.A.W.. 3 ff(f 1 79 4 C.1 --1 i x 7915.4 l Â¢ 0-21 0 913.2 1 ~r. 1 4 r j, 0 ----it t !-- - Zit 14 1 ./ t:St 146 11 k i 91/ 15 LI>g __ // 1 p ./ x -- ' f (31 41 1 ../7 7915.7 1 79!fÂ· 0 y Il I ! r 1 1 2 1 101 Â£5065> ./ R r-7---- it ,/ - i~ i- - / 1/ 1, r--3 . / 1- Â· i -rf)\ 12' 3 } 1~1' 4 , f U C 60 ALLY C '*bl) A.1 / i Dll /417 c x ) 9 6-13 2,7,1- ff i - . 1 1 -- Y >/ . . COLORKDO CULTURAL RESOURC~ RVEY .........--11"pqi.6 ~1300 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203 fal ~RCHITECTURAL/HISTORICAL COMPONENT FORM 1 0~,i ~ IMPORTANT: USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GREEN INVENTORY RECORD FORM FOR 1 FOR RECORDING HISTORIC STRUCTURES AND DISTRICTS. USE SEPARATELY FOR ~ â€ž44" 1 RECORDING STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES. 1) Resource No.5PT-113 2) Temp No. 369 3) Name WEBBER BLOCK/Elks Building 4) Address 220 South Galena Street 31 District Name COMMERCIAL CORE HISTORIC DIS. I. INTEGRITY: 61 Condition: Good * Fair Deteriorated 7) original Use Business:Bank/stores/officeil Present Use Elks lodge/small businesses/office 9) Original Site * Moved Date Cs) Â®f Move: N/A 10) Unaltered Altered * Explainf West facade changed. II. DESCRIPTION; 111 Building Materials Brick with local Sdndstone 121 _Construction Date 1891 131 Architect/Builder unknown 14) Architectural Style Csl Victorian 15) Special Features/Surroundings: Dome on SW corner; cornice detail. 161 Archaeological Potential: Yes No Unknown * Explaint III. CULTURAL ACTIVITIES: Key the resource type (ie: house, barn, shed, school, church, etc) to the cultural activity theme and sub-theme category associated with it. 17) THEME Commercial 18) SUB-THEME Professional Services 19) TYPES Bank/stores/offices RESOURCE Not . I Â¢ (Attach Photographs) Frame Number 33 Roll Number 10B Facade Orientation S IV. SIGNIFICANCE: Assess whether or not the resource has any historical or architectural merit by checking appropriate categories and justifying below. Include any relevant historical data. 20) Architectural Significance: 21) Historical Significance: _ Represents work of a master _ Associated with significant persons _ Possesses high artistic values Associated with significant events or * Represents a type, period, or patterns method of construction _* Contributes to the significance of an historic district HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The Webber Block, completed in 1891 was considered to be the most important building erected that year. In value, it ranked only third in the city, outclassed by the Hotel Jerome and the Wheeler Opera House. It cost $40,000. Built for Henry Webber, one of Aspen's most influential and controversial figures. Formerly a shoemaker, Mr. Webber became Mayor of Aspen. ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE: A combination of Frying Pan pink sandstone and pressed brick for the outside walls give the building great detail. The carved sandstone on top of columns are for affect also. The plate glass windows in the corner room were then the largest in the city. 22) List Any Associated Cultural Group: none V. REFERENCES: Aspen's Early Days - by Heather Hopton and Lilo Schuldner Johnson Publishing Co. 1978 Pitkin County Courthouse Records Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps RECORDER V.G.Kirkpatrick DATE Sept. 30, 1980 ~ --- - ,-.......I--Il-.-I'...I--i .ALITTE:WI'll//1//":il://"/f 'll/:M/'ll......7 . IIISTORIC BUILDINGS OF ASPEN Survey Inventory dame of Building the El.ks Building Original Name Webber Block Present Owner BPOE Elks Lodge 224 Original Owner Henrv Webber Elks Lodge, Small Business: Bank, Present Use Businesses, Offices Original Use Stores & Offices Date of Construction 1801 Locationt (legal description & street address) Black 94, Lots K, I,, M 210 South Galena Street Physical Description: Vall Construction Pirk Sandstone from the Frying Pan Quarries and Pressed Brick no. of Stories 3 Physical Condition Endangered Interior Exterior - Remarks : (notable features, historical significance, etc.) 1,/ 1/91 The Webber Block was to be built at a cost of $40,000. Only the Wheeler Opera House and the ,lerorie Hotel cost more. The Webber Block was to have steam heating, electric ligh-ting and "waterworks" in every room. The large space on the third floor was to be fitied for a society hall,- ~ ,Â· 3./ 1/91 The interior was being finished and the building was reported. to he almost ready for occupancy. 8/ 6/91 Al].an's Drug Store opened at the corner of Hyman Avenue and Galena Street. At the grand opening, r,early 1,000 lady visitors were givet, souvenir bouquets. 5/ 3/92 The Aspen National Bank, new owners of the Webber Block, opened their doors for business, and the building became known as the "Bank Building", In 1926 the Post Office moved to this corner. Published Sources: (arthor, title, page, date) Court House records frcm the Treasurer's office ard the Assessor's office Aspen Dai ly Times Articles: 2/ 7/93 PRÂ· 7 col. 1 1/ 1/92 pg. 4 col. 9 2/13/91 pg. 4 col, 3 2/ 5/93 pg. 5 col. 4 11/ 8/91 pg. 4 col. 4 1/24/91 pg. 4 col. 1 1/13/93 pg. 3 col. 1 11/ 2/91 pg. 4 col. 4 1/14/91 pg. 2 col. 5 1/ 1/93 pg. 1 col. 5, 7 10/22/91 pg. 3 col. 3 1/1/91 pg. 2 col. 5 15 3 8/28/91 pg. 3 col. 1-3 17 5* 8/ 9/91 pg. 6 col. 6, 5 1/ 3/93 PgÂ· 8 col. 5 8/ 6/91 pg. 4 col. 2 7/ 3/92 pg. 3 col. 4 8/ 2/91 pg. 4 col. 5 5/ 3/92 pg. 4 col. 5,6,7 7/ 1/91 pg. 4 col. 7, 8 3/22/92 pg. 4 col. 7 4/17/91 pg. 4 col. 2 3/19/92 pg. 4 col. 5 3/ 1/91 pgâ€¢ 6 col. 3 2/16/92 pg. 4 col. 5 2/13/91 pg, 4 col. 3 1 ,Jar.2 ; May 1, 1974 - Name or :'esearcher , Aspen Historical Society Research Committee INVt.NTORY OF HIS-[ORIC SITES & STRUC. -ES ANALYSIS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE -- ASPEN, COLORADO 19 80 RESOURCE NUMBER: NAME OF STRUCTURE/SITE/PROJECT: tEl KO LOCATION: 94 ELM Block Lot Street Address RESOURCE INTEGRITY: 0= None,N/A /1= Notable /2= Excellent /3= Exceptional (Maximum - 3 Points) DEGREE OF SIGNIFICANCE SCORE I. 1-7 Historically Associated with Events of Significance to: . LOCALE . REGION 2 1 Â«02 3 . STATE 0123 . NATION 0123 SUBTOTAL T-Fi II. /--7 Historically Associated with Individuals or Groups which are Significant to: . LOCAL 01~3 . REGION 0123 . STATE 0123 . NATION 0123 SUBTOTAL f=53 III. f / Embodies Distinctive Characteristics of: . TYPE/STYLE ARCHITECTURE/CONSTRUCTION 0123 . PERIOD OF ARCHITECTURE 0 1 2 d) . METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION 0123 SUBTOTAL T-ST IV. 1--T Represents the Work of a Significant Craftsman/Wilder/Architect: . LOCALLY ~123 . REGIONAL 7123 . NATIONAL 0123 SUBTOTAL 0 V. // A Noteworthy Surviving Example of a Styl e Becoming Rare in the Locale or is Identified with a Street Scene or other Landscape 0 1 2~ iii Lu-1 VI. Possesses High Artistic Value 0 1 2 ~ TOTAL POINTS i Ill i Â£__/ 1-6 Points = NOTABLE DATE: 40-7- 7 -12 POINTS = EXCELLENT 27 13 - 18 POINTS = EXCEPTIONAL . L-HISTORIC DESIGNATION Application Package Contents Attached is a Development Application package for submission of your application. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Application Form 2. Description of Minimum Contents of Development Application 3. Description of Specific Contents for Submission of your Application 4. Copy of Review Standards for Your Application 5. Public Hearing Notice Requirements Summary 6. General Summary of Your Application Process Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in the application form and attach to it that written and mapped information identified in Attachments 2 and 3. Please note that all applications require responses to the review standards for that particular development type. The standards for your application are listed in Attachment 4. You can determine if your application requires that public notice be given by reviewing Attachment 5. Table 1 of that attachment will tell you whether or not your application requires notice and the form the notice should take. Your responsibilities in this regard are summarized in the cover explanation to the table. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planning Office staff person so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described to you. Please also recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. appcover ' 0*41 Attachment 5 Public Hearing Notice Requirements - FS CS:S> There are three forms of notice required by the Aspen Land Use Regulations, these being notice by publication in the newspaper, notice by posting of the property and notice by mail to surrounding landowners. You can .determine whether your application requires notice, and the type of notice it requires, from Table 1, which is attached to this summary. Following is a summary of the notice requirements, including identifying who is responsible for completing the notice. 1. Publication Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen is to be done at least 15 days prior Â·, to the hearing. The legal notice will be written by the Planning Office Administrative Assistant and we will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline. 2. Posting Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done 10 days prior to the hearing. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Planning Office, to fill it in correctly and to bring proof (preferably a photograph) to the hearing that posting took place. 3. Mailing Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject development parcel by the applicant. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the Planning Office, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the hearing (in the form of a signed affidavit) that the mailing took place. Standards for notice shall be as follows: a. Any federal agency, state, county or municipal government service district or quasi governmental agency that owns property within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 15 days prior to the hearing. b. All other landowners within 300 feet of the subject property must be mailed notice 10 days prior to the hearing, unless notice is given by hand delivery, in which case it must be sent 5 days prior to the hearing. C. Subdivision applications only also require notice by registered mail to all surface owners, mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners of the subject property. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty days prior to the date of public hearing. TABLE 1 . SUMMARY uF IURTIC HEARING NOTICE PROCEIXT.- APPLICATION TYPE PUBLIC HEARING REWIRED? BY WHOM FURM OF NOTICE* Conditional Use Y Cammission 2,3 Special Review N 8040 Greenline N Stream Margin N Mountain View Plane N Conceptual Historic Development Y HPC 1,2,3 Final Historic Development N Minor Historic Development N Historic Demolition Y HPC 1,2,3 Historic Designation Y HPC, Commis. HPC-1,2,3 & Council Commis.- 1,2,3 Council-4 , Conceptual SPA Y Council 1,2,3 Final SPA Y Commission 1,2,3 Conceptual PUD 'Â· Y Council 1,2,3 Final PUD Y Cammission 1,2,3 it Subdivision Â· Y Â· Commission 1,2,3 Condominiumization N Lot Split Y Council 1,2,3 Lot Line Adjustment N GMQS Allotment Y Commission 1,2,3 GMQS Exemption N (except for see above for lot split lot split) Map Amendments Y Commission & Commis.-1,2,3 Council Council-4 Text Amendments Y Commission & Commis.-1 Council Council-4 * Numbers refer to the following: 1 = Publication in newspaper 2 = Posting of property 3 = Mailing to surrounding landowners 4 = Ordinance adoption procedures Attachment 6 General Summary of Three Step HPC/Commission/Council Application Process 1. Application Types: The following are the Development Applications which are processed in three steps by the HPC, Commission and Council: * Designate Historic Structure 2. Development Review Procedure Summary. The three step HPC/ Commission/Council review procedure can be described as follows. Stage One: Attend pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with staff is to determine the review process into which your development proposal fits and to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. Stage Two: Submit Development Application. Based on your meeting with staff, you should respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies of a complete application, with the appropriate processing fee, to the Planning Office. Stage Three: Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by a member of the staff. You will be notified in writing of whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not you have submitted what was requested, not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. Stage Four: Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, a date for its review by the HPC will be set. The submission due date is 25 days prior to the HPC review date, to allow for the required Public Hearing notice, staff review and memo preparation. It is the planner's task to review your application with respect to its compliance with the Code and to write a review memo. In the memo, the planner will recommend approval, denial or tabling of the application and recommend appropriate conditions to this action. The memo is normally available at the end of the week before your hearing. You will be called to pick up a copy of the memo when it is ready, or we can mail it to you if you so request. During the period of staff review, it is essential that public notice be given, when required for your development application. Attachment 5 explains how to go about giving the required notice. Your project will be presented to the HPC at a regularly scheduled meeting. A copy of the agenda showing where during the meeting your application is scheduled can be obtained when you pick up the staff memo. The typical meeting includes a presentation by staff, a presentation by you or your representative, questions and comments by the review body and the public and an action on the staff recommendation, unless additional information is requested by the review body. If an application for significant development is being consolidated with the designation process, the conceptual approval must be granted prior to the designation recommendation being made. Significant development is a two step process: conceptual review followed by final review. Conceptual development review is a public hearing, final is not. Usually final review may be accomplished within one month of conceptual approval, depending upon the scope of the project. Once a recommendation is made by the HPC, a review by the Commission can be scheduled. This review is typically scheduled for the next available agenda, within 30 days of the date of the HPC's recommendation. An updated staff memo will be prepared for this meeting, which will again be made 6 available to you just prior to the meeting. Commission action normally requires a single meeting, unless additional information is requested. Once a recommendation is made by the Commission, a review by the council can be scheduled. This review is typically scheduled for the next agenda, within about 15 days of the date of the Commission's recommendation. Ordinance adoption, however, requires two readings by Council. The second reading is a public hearing. Due to notice requirements, the second reading is generally scheduled 3 or 4 weeks after first reading. If applicable, the designation grant will be included in the Ordinance. Stage Five: Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received final approval of your development application, you may proceed to building permit review. During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code. It Will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is issued. For more information on the Building Permit Stage, please visit the Building Department to obtain handouts on their review procedures. 3. Consolidation: One and two step applications which you may consolidate with a three step application are: * Conditional use * Special review * ESA * GMQS exemption for historic landmark or affordable housing * Significant historic development * Minor historic development If you are submitting any of the above applications along with your three step application, you should also obtain the application package for that type of submission from this office. 3stepsumm 4 rATTACHMENT 2 3 Minimum Submission Contents for All Development Applications All Development Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information and materials. 1. The applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easemqnts, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2"x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel,within the City of Aspen. 5. An explanation of why the proposed development complies with the substantive development review standards relevant to the Development Application. 0 1 11Â¢ rfk. j i G. 1Â¥ 1 4 ATTACHMENT 3 Specific Submission ~ontents: Application for Histor~ Designation The application for Histo-tic-~Designation shall include the following: A. A boundary description ~/ the site; O/~~A~IMENT ~ Review Standards: Application for Historic Designation Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the following standards may be designated as H, Historic Overlay District and/or Historic Landmark: A. Historical Importance. The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. B. Architectural Importance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen character. C. Architectural Importance. The structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. D. Architectural Importance. The structure is a sig- nificant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. E. Neighborhood Character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant 4: neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighbor- hood character. F. Community Character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other struc- tures or sites of historical or architectural impor- tance. kiLIAL~Mt.tir .1. IAND USE APPLICATION FURM 1) Project Name Elks Building 2) Project location 210 S. Galena Aqpen Lots K.L. & M. R lock 94 (indicate street address, lot & block rumber, legal description where apprupriate) 3) Present Zoning C C 4) Lot Size _-a~~flqq ft 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Elks Club No. 774 210 S. Galena 925-4384 6) Representative's Name, Address & Fhane # Ed Irwin. 210 S. Galena 925-3516 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Green]Line Conceptial POD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final FUD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivision V Historic Designation ) Condaniniumization - Text/Map Amendment 1-OC - I ' --1--- ___Lli- Ict Spli~Ict Line - GEOS EÂ®emption Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (rnmber arid type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft. ; runber of bedroans; any previous approvals grarrted to the property). Basement - Mech 252 sq.ft., Elks Club 1278 sq.ft., Rest./Stor. 4797 sq.ft. Ground Ip\/pl - Flkq 21RR cq.ft., retail 4072 sq,ft. 2nd. Floor - Elks 2364 sq.ft., Office 3250 sq.ft. 3rd. Floor - Office 5614 sq.ft. 9) Description of Develorment Application Add new stair/elev. tower west of the Building in existing empty lot. Reconfigure existing interior spaces to the following; Move all Elks functions to the third floor. 2!10Â· floor becomes all offices. Ground level becomes all retail. Basement becomes storage for ground level retail . Clppr, Antire building. Replace existing store front at Elks Club to approximately match new store front at Espirit. Add new exit stair on north side of building. 10) Have you attach- the following? X Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents x Response to Attacbment 4, Review Standards for Your Application f-=i:-:@iall =1 . May 25, 1989 Mr. Michael Doyle, Architect Hagman Yaw Architects 210 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Re: The Elks Building (Webber Block) Dear Michael: Thank you for your patience in receiving this letter to follow up our meeting with Ed Irwin of the Elks. I am extremely excited about this project and intend to give it top priority when an application is received. Many issues face us on the renovation of this marvelous, one-of- a-kind structure. The first priority is, of course, Landmark Designation, of which an application has already been received by the Planning Office. Landmark Designation is crucial to the project, and allows for many benefits that are not available to non-historic structures. The obvious first benefit is GMQS Exemption. The second benefit is directly involved with the preservation incentives incorporated into Ordinance 16 (becoming Ordinance 27, film at 10:00!). Ordinance 16 allows the Planning Director complete authority to sign off on the development activities you are proposing. Change of Use is exempt from impact mitigation and P&Z review (for Landmarks); payment-in-lieu for parking is eliminated, and affordable housing impact fees and requirements significantly lessened! In this case, no affordable housing mitigation is required due to no enlargement of net leasable floor area. The majority of your efforts in obtaining approval for the development activity, therefore, involve the HPC. As the development exceeds 250 sq. ft., the proposal is considered Significant Development, requiring approval at both Conceptual and Final Development stages. The public hearing is held at the Conceptual stage. I would suggest that we combine both the Landmark Designation and Conceptual Development public hearing notices in one mailing to save the Elks time and money in noticing. I am anxious to schedule Conceptual review before the . 6 , HPC when you are ready; your application would need to be in the Planning Office no later than 5:00 p.m., Friday, three and a half weeks before the scheduled meeting to allow for noticing and staff memo preparation. Again, my suggestion to you in designing the exterior elevator shaft is to follow in the steps of the Wheeler's, which works quite well. I am very interested to see how yours works in elevation. Beyond the benefits associated with local Landmark Designation are those associated with the National Register listing, which the Webber Block is eligible. I strongly recommend the Elks consent to listing; commercial historic structures are afforded significant benefits, such as federal tax credits and deductions for facade easements. I have already passed along to you information on the National Register of Historic Places, which I trust you have shared with Ed Irwin. The new non-profit Aspen Historic Trust is in the process of formalizing its incorporation, and Will be able to receive facade and conservation easements as charitable donations very soon. I am very excited about examining all the innovative incentive methods we can, taking advantage of the Webber Block's historic landmark status. Please call me at any time, and I look forward to receiving your application. Sincerely, Roxanne Eflin Historic Preservation Planner og.doyle 12 May 1989 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Roxanne Eflin 303/925-2867 HPC 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Roxanne: The following are square footage tabulations of use changes for the Elks Building. These numbers do not include Esprit and Shooters, as they are not affected by the remodel. I couldn't remember what we said about whether to include the basement in the calculations so I have tabulated it both ways. With Basement Included existing proposed net change Elks 5,825 5,614 - 211 Retail 0 3,461 + 3,461 Office 8,864 5,614 - 3,250 Without Basement Included Elks 4,547 5,614 + 1,067 Retail 0 2,183 + 2,183 Office 8,864 5,614 - 3,250 When you have had a chance to review these, please call me so we can discuss this further. Very truly yours, M 144 3,94 Michael J L/boyle ~Al A Associate Partner MJD:sv CC: Ed Irwin MAN 12 Aspen Elks Lodgu Tr224 210 S. Galena Stâ€ž #21 - 1 Aspen, CO 81611 Lodge 920-4384 Office 925-3516 4 To whom it may concern: Address of the corporation is as above. The Chairman of the Trustees is Ed Irwin and his office is at the above address. The legal description is Lots K,L, & M, Block 94 Aspen. Sincerely, 60 6Â« Ed Irwin Trustee Chariman Iguyer~litle Insurance @rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: 05/16/89 AT 8:00 A.M. Case No. PCT-3444 2. Policy or policies to be issued: (a)ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 3-1970 Amount S PRO FORMA (Rev. 10-17-70 & 10-17-84) or 10/21/87 Premium $ PROPOSED INSURED: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224. BENEVOLENT and PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (b)ALTA Loan Policy, Amount S (REV. 10-21-87) Premium S PROPOSED INSURED: (c)Alta Loan Construction Policy. 1975 Amount S (Rev. 10-17-84) Premium S PROPOSED INSURED: Tax Cert. S 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224. BENEVOLENT and PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOTS K, L AND M, BLOCK 94. CITY AND TOWNSITED OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN. CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules A and B are attached. ized offi r agent iorm 100 Litho in U.S.A. )35-0-100-0041/2 Impyers litle Insumnce @rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: PRO FORMA This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 1 PG.1 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-3444 A and B are attached. rm77TmE~77;FIFTEEFimmiETTTETIVTmmiETF--EiFIREUEIEIIEIEIZEEEIEIEIEIZEiIEIZEEELELE Form 100 Litho in U.S.A. 035-0-100-0041/2 rf.,1 Impyerspue Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements. or claims of easements. not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments. and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien. or right to a lien. for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects. liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters. if any, created. first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment. charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing aistrict. 7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded October 26. 1887 in Book 59 at Page 64 and recorded March 29. 1889 in Book 59 at Page 549 as follows: That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold. silver. cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws. 8. Mineral reservations as contained in Deeds recorded June 10. 1891 in Book 98 at Page 496, in Book 105 at Page 129 and in Book 106 at Page 482 as follows: The full free and perpetual right to dig, work. search for. mine and remove all ores and mineral bearing rock and earth underneath the land. 9. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Notice of Historic Designation as set forth in instrument recorded January 13, 1975 in Book 295 at Page 515. 10. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Leases as set forth in instruments recorded November 17. 1985 in Book 499 at Page 976; July 23, 1986 in Book 515 at Page 21. Continued ~mummt=a-â€¢=u=u=u=m=u~m=m=â€¢=11=u=â€¢=u--~1-m~~I~I~Imm~Imi~~mm~mB Form 100 Litho in U.S.A. 035-0-100-0041/2 r.n '1 Ieyers 11tle Insumnce @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 11. Terms. conditions. obligations and provisions of Encroachment Agreement. as set forth in instrument recorded July 11. 1986 in Book 514 at Page 353. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule 3-Section 2 PG.2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-3444 A and B are attached. -orm 100 Litho in U.S.A. )35-0-100-0041/2 1411)yers title Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 CONTINUED Exceptions numbered NONE are hereby omitted. The Owner's/Mortgage Policy to be issued. if any. shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust. if any. required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Unpatented mining claims: reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing issuance thereof: water rights. claims or title to water. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule 3-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No.PCT-3444 A and B are attached. Form 100 Litho in USA. 035-0-100-0041/2 1 11( 1 I It- 1 -Ill I J]( 1 11( 1 1.11 1 I 1( 1 -' 1 11( 1 11( 1 1 It I I It 1 1 1{ - 1 11( 1 1 I' liN 1 11( 1 1 1( 1 1 1 11< 1 11, 1 1 It ] 11~ i I li 1 11( 1 1.11 m .1 . 12!1DEIS Iltle Insurance @rporation NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policyorpoliciesof title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land describedorreferred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiumsand chargestherefor; all subject totheprovisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insuredandtheamountof the policyor policiescommitted for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof bythe Company, eitheratthetimeof theissuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policiescommitted forshall issue, whichever first occurs, providedthatthe falluretoissuesuch policyorpoliciesisnotthe faultof the Company. This Commitmentshall not be validorbinding untilcountersignedbyanauthorizedofficeroragent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment otherthan those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall failtodisclosesuchknowledgetotheCompanyin writing,theCompanyshall berelieved from liability foranylossordamage resulting from anyactof reliance hereontotheextenttheCompanyisprejudiced by fallureto sodisclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge tothe Company, orif the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Companyat itsoptionmayamend Schedule Bof thisCommitmentaccordingly, butsuchamendmentshall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking ingood faith(a)tocomply withtherequirementshereof, or(b)toeliminate exceptionsshown in Schedule B, or(c)to acquire orcreatethe estate or interest or mortgagethereon covered bythis Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. lau>ers -Iltle Insu#Â¥e Grporation Elite. 47 044)116741* . 00*â€ž4-414/ 36 President 00 â€¢ Attest: fc SE A LI:%~i f 0 Â»23 )31 , 31 Secretary. 4"*Â· 11< 1 Ili 1 114 Ill 'IIi 1 1.11 1 Ill 1, 1 1 [1 1 11' ~ 111 1 11( 1 lit : 111 111( ! Ill 1 11{ 1111 1 1 -9 1 1 1( 1 11( 9090-880-1-980 83AOO 10I AMOQW 93 16 11( 1 11( 1 11( 1 11( 1 11/ 1 Ill 1 Ill 1 11( 1 11< 1 11, 1 111 lili lili 1 11/ 1 11( 1 11( 111/ 1 Ill Ill[ 1 Ilt 1 11( 1 1 14 I I Ic r I Il I I l( 1 I I( IJ li I I IA I Ill 1 lit 11 1( III( 1 11( 1 1 N 1 11( 1 11( 1 11( I Ill lili 1 11< 1 Ill 1 11( 1 1]( 1 11( 1 11( 1 Ill 111( 1 1 !( 1 11( 1 11( 1 11( !11( Ill' 1 1 It 111( liu Eli< -111( -I -1 ]( Ill{ kwyer~Iitle Insumnce @poration ROCKY MOUNTAIN COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE 111( 111( 1.11( 111( 1-11{ 1.11(-111( 111(III(211(1111( 1.11(3111 111( 111( 1-11( 111{ 11't ]11( 111( 111( 111( 1-11( LIU'lliC Illt Kill tilt 1-11(-111( PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc. Title Insurance Company Vincent J. Higens 601 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Christina M. Davis President (303) 925-1766 Â· (303) 925-6527 FAX Vice President MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP-ACCOMMODATION NO LIABILITY FOR THE SOLE USE OF: PLEASE DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: HAGMAN AND YAW CHARLES A. DORN PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1766 FAX (303) 925-6527 DESCRIPTION: LOTS K, L AND M, BLOCK 94, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. GRANTEE IN THE LAST INSTRUMENT APPARENTLY TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRUST DEEDS AND MORTGAGES APPARENTLY UNRELEASED: NONE LIENS AND JUDGEMENTS (AGAINST LAST GRANTEE) APPARENTLY UNRELEASED: NONE THIS INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR SOLE USE AND BENEFIT AND IS FURNISHED AS AN ACCOMMODATION. THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM OUR TRACT INDICES, WITHOUT REFERENCE, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO, OR EXAMINATION OF, INSTRUMENTS WHICH PURPORTS TO AFFECT THE REAL PROPERTY. THE INFORMATION IS NEITHER GUARANTEED NOR CERTIFIED, AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE , OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND OUR LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT OF THE FEES. DATE: MAY 16 ,_~1989~-ATbi: 00 A.M. FfK~1JNTY _0TITÂ·LENC.*- - L. 1-,1 V. : -= ELI<S - WEBBER BLOCK - 1891 The Webber Block was built in 1891 of brick costing $40,000. January 24, 1891, the plate glass windows arrived. These were the largest in the city. The corner room was being fitted for a drug store. March 21, 1892, the Webber Block was sold to the Molly Gibson people -- vicinity of $60,000. . ~ May 3, 1892, the new bank purchased the building formerly known as the Webber Block, corner of Hyman and Galena. It will now be called th;e Bank Building. January 1, 1893, the Bank Building is pictured in the Aspen Daily Times. The article relates that the bank will move into the corner room. The interior woodwork is all of finest quality of maho- gony and is handsomely carved and is surmounted by elegant and uni- que wrought iron work in Japanese copper finish. Long panels of beveled French plate glass were placed and has the appearance of being frosted. The floor is of blue and white tile. C h WEBBER BLOCK (Elks Building) Excerpts from the Aspen Daily Times Date page col. Item 1-22-1888 4 3 Webber plans new block 3-29,1888 3 5 Letter to the people of Aspen that Henry Webber will retire from boot and shoe business 3-29-1888 2 3 .... "No man in the city . .would make a better mayor. The result is that a great majority of the voters of Aspen are going to support him." 3-31-1888 2 2 Republican City Ticket. For Mayor -- Henry Webber, For Alderman, second ward, Thomas Latta. Editorial; Tom Latta is safe for one hundred majority in the Second. Col. 3=--"There is no one who will dispute tha assertion that Mr. Webber is just the kind of man we need..(for mayor) He is an experienced and succesful business man, long identified with Aspen has familiarized him with the needs of this city in paeticular while long experience .... etc " 4-1-1888 2 2 Henry Webber - the business men"s & miners candidate for mayor 4-3-1888 1 4 Republican meeting day before elect rion. "Mr. McDevitt told of the time when Mr. Webber on the bench with Lemmer in Land had saved the books of mdners on the mountain & they lwould n6t forget him tomorrow. . Mr. Webber made cl closing speech "He said we are all working men.....etc.." 4-4-1888 2 2 Editorial congratulating the republican party of Aspen on the results of the election. More than 100 plurality. 4-4-3:888 4 4 Henry Webber elected Mayor by plurality of 106. Total of 672 votes vs. E..C. Stemson, Dem, 566; 'and Chas A. Chapman, workingmen 211 votes. 9-21-1890 3 3 An article on Aspen Buildings, description, constbuction cost, sizei etc. 11-18-1890 4 3 Local & Personal 2nd story feached 1-1-91 2 5 "The most imp't bldg ............. 1, 1-14-1891 4 3 Under personals "Webber blk. room used for dancing school" 1-24-1891 4 1 "The Webber Windows" plate glass, put in place yeaterday T he largest in the City 112 X 140 3/8 inch thick..$200.00 2-13-91 4 3 "'Phde-T he plastering of the upper rooms .......... 1, 3-1-91 6 3 The plastering has been completed. Hall on 3rd floor being fitted for a society hall. Furnishing the insides- will soon be ready for occupancy. 4-17-91 4 2 Webber Blk. is nearing completion. 7-1-91 2 7 Ad, W. E. Rohde, J. P. , John H. Bean constable & collector 7-1-91 4 7&8 Ad D. E. Lutes - (shoe store) 7-8-91 4 7&8 Ad 8-2-91 4 5 Allan Drug Store - at corner of Hyman Ave. & Galena "A palace of beauty" "To be soon opened for Public Inspection" long article, description of interior & furnishings... 8-6-91 4 2 Allan"s drud store opened yes-terday "nearly 1,000 lady visitors wwere given souvinir boquets" 8-9-91 6 5&6 Ad. Allan, Druggist 10-22-91 3 3 Newly formed Aspen Athletic Assn. leased fooms Â·in the Webber blk. 8-28-91 3 1&3 Ad. Hee Hive - Removal Sale on Hyman Ave. 11-22-91 4 4 Personals: Allan's Drug Store- rooms above have been elegantly fitted - Mollie Gibson Co. is settling into them ' WEBBERBLOCK (Elks Building) - 2- from the Aspen Daily Times Date page col. Item 11-7-1891 2 1 (Ad) Attorney at Law -- Aaron Stein 11-7-91 3 8 (Ad) W. E, Rhode Justice of the Peace John H. Bean - Constable & Collector 11-7-91 4 5,6 Allan Druggist 11-7-91 4 3 Local & Personal - Athletics Association "goods" arrived for new quarters 1-1-1892 4 9 (Ad) W. E. Rohde - Justice of the Peace 1-3-92 4 5,6 (Ad) Allan - Druggist 2-16-92 4 5 (Ad) Frank D. Howe, Civil Engineer, moved his office to room 11 3-19-92 4 5 Aspen National Bank will soon open, President J. J. Hagerman, Capital stock $100,000.00 3-22-92 4 7 "The Webber Block Sold" The Mollie Gibson people have about closed the purchase of the Webber Block at a price in the vicinity of $60,000.00 5-3-92 4 1,5 The Aspen National Bank will open its doors today. This building now known as "Bank,Building" 5-3-92 4 7 "Fine & Stylish Footwear" D. E. Lutz 5-3-92 4 5,6 "The New Bank" to open for business - have purchsed building 5-10-92 Entire Half page ad- D..E Lutz & Co. -Sale on Boots & Shoes. 7-3-92 3 4 Allanfs Pharmacy " There is no pharmacy in the city ....o in the Webber Block, telephone no. 56 ............ 9-27-92 8 6 The Aspen National Bank has ordered costly fistures and will move into the corner room of the Block in a few days 1-1-1893 1 7 "Round about Town" Oil painting received ........ 1-1-93 17 5 "The Aspen National"- pciture of building "Bank moved into corner room recently ....... 1-3-93 8 5 Western Union of go into the Bank Block 1-1-93 15 3 "Contractors & Builders" Sears & Atkinson 1-1-93 17 5 "The Aspen National" organized 1892..interior woodwork of finest mahogany..wrought iron work in Jap copper finish beveled French plate glass..handsome blue & white tile floor of polished basket of Levanese marble. 1-13-93 3 1 (Ad) Aspen National Bank 2-5-93 5 4 (Ad) Clearance Sale,.D. E. Lutz & Co. Store in Bank Bldg 2-7-93 7 1 Directory: United Brothers of Carpenters & Joiners of America .... meets ... in Carpenter Hall, Webber Bldg. 2-7--93 7 1 Lodge Directory Aspen Trades Assembly meets at Carpenter's Hall in Bank Building ......... WEBBER BLOCK Items of Interest "I can remember going to Aspen with my Father,Louis Vagneur in the early 1920 's. Among our stops thatday buying supplies for the ranch, we visited the local implement dealer, He had on display a new McCormick reaper which was on the floor of the of the old bank lobby. I remember the steel wheel, with cleats was standing on the tile floor. Many of the tiles were broken and had come loose from the supfloor. I took some of the tiles home with me to play with. Many of the other rooms were empty. Still painted on the glass windows, were the name of the bank. A blacksmith shop was located at one time to the rear of the building." The Masonic Bodies moved into the third floor in 1912 and have occupied this space ever since. by George Vagneur From Peggy Clifford are obtained the following information: The building was built by Jerry Irwin (from Leadville) who also did the Brown & Hoag Block. The Post Office was located here from 1924 to 1959. It was a very popular place - many residents congregated there every morning about 11;00 to wait the arrival of the train and subsequent delivery of maile The P. 0. boxes had brass facing, The floor was woold| and by 1959, the floors creaked, there was flaking paint, hissing radiators, etc. The only bank was across the street in the Cowenhoven Building. Concerning Henry Webber-- He located in Aspen in 1880 & was the first boot & shoe dealer. Struck it rich in the mts. and enlarged the business. His first wife committed suicide, by taking strychnine, under suspicious circumstances. Murmuring "Henry can tell" she died May 29, 1881. She was one of the original 13 women to come in the winter of 1880-1881. He later married his niece - who was living with them at the time. His wife's death proved convenient to his romance so rumor persisted that he was associated with her daetht Flyer page 24 lu,-M#Â« (9 78 ~ A glance at Aspen's past -.*11 Looking Back Webber: man of means and scandal henewlyorganizedsilvermin- 1880 provided hope for many. With this greatsuccess, hewaswellable -*.0- Â¢5124 , ...1 . 1. 11. accomplished through an investment in ....- ing community of Aspen in the Emma lease on Aspen Mountain. In this picturesque and to expand his profitable boot and shoe . 1 peaceful valley, a man might business. 01.': /' 1.'i~ : .1 make his fortune and perhaps begin life In 1885, the Webbers built a lovely .40 4.- . 1 .1 anew. home on Bleeker Street. The structure 9 t.., HenryWebberwasapioneerwithjust cost $3000 and was distinguished by a . - ..t..â€ž.../... ....... . - such aspirations. "French roof willi iron crestings sur- ~ .Mii- v ~40 Initially, it did not appear that Web- rounding it."This structure, inspired by - 3*.,S,NA - ber's life would be asuccess story.When Parisian architecture, was christened business in the East failed, he packed "Pioneer Park" by Webber and graces up his shoe niaking kit and set off for the city of Aspen to present day. # *m~*Â¢315'~.~ ~â‚¬ 1 0 behind a wife, two sons, and a ranch. The Webbers hosted and attended ,11. L.'Ilt ' Altliough business improved with many parties in the thriving mining city. a t. . ' 1~* 34141.111: - this move, Webber's wife decided she The Aspen Times reported that Webber U .- 11*1.11 R would not travel West to Join him and, "makes himself felt among political within a year, secured a divorce. leaders." Yet he was also generous with '.. 0) Webber remarricd and with his new his new wealth, becoming "among the 2 5 O wife, Harriet, moved loAspen, becoming leaders of charitable and public ....... - -1 e the community's first boot and shoe enterprises." 1 dealer. The Republican Party backed Webber ?4 Investing heavily in land in and for the mayoral office in 1888. This time "Â· - â€¢Â· around the city, he took a strong stand Webber's opponent was a corporate ~ 2 ye- 2:Â¥ 1 against the Aspen Town and Land Com- lawyer feared by the community tb The Elks Building, on Mill Street and Hyman Avenue, is a lasting pany. Acknowledgement as a leader in "estrange from the interests of the the movement to secure the rights ofthe people." testament to the entrepreneur Henry Webber. Webber, a former small land owner was a positive turn of Webber, on the other hand, was a mayor of Aspen, built the structure in 1891 for a cost of about fate, which served him well in later large properly owner who had, in fact, $40,000. The Webber Building boasted the largest plate-glass win- years. fought a corporation for the rights of the dows in the city, steam heating and electric lights. Webber also In June of 1881, theAspen Commun- small land owner. Some felt Webber's built the Victorian home in Pioneer Park on W Bleeker, distin- ilywasshocked by the news of the dealli success story mirrored that of the thriv- of Mrs Webber and the rumor that she ing mining community, and on this plat- guished by a wrought iron railing around the rooL had committed suicide. Even more forniWebberbecamethenewcommuni- exciting for the skeptics within the city ty leader. community, Webber constructed a Webber's final addition to the perma- were her last words to the doctor called A lofty position put Webber in full three story buildirig on the corner of nent structures of Aspen was a square to the scene: "Henry can tell you what I view of a community which still har- I-lyman Avenue and Galena Street. This red-brick building on Hopkins Avenue have been taking. bored a few doubts and some smolder- structure, known today as the Elks now known as the Isis Theatre. Not tlie 40* 0 At the coronor's- inquest, among :- ing rumors about his character. It did Building, cost $40,000 and was out- spectacular enterprise of the previous those leslifyingwas JuliaNevilt, niece of not take more than one month before a ranked in importance only by the Hotel year, the Webber Building was then and the deceased. who had been residing at letter appeared in the Aspen Times Jerome and the Wheeler Opera House. remains today a very functional busi- the Webbers' hollie. Although the jury's accusing Webber of renting one of his ness structure. verdict clearly stated thal Mrs Webber's properties to Mollie Keyes, a woman The building had steam heating and death was caused by "an overdose of known to operate a house of "ill-fame. electric lights as well as "water works in When Henry Webber left Aspen in strychnia taken by mistake," a part of This letter was written by none other every room." It also featured the largest 1904, bound for Utah, he left behind the community never really believed it. than the honorable Judge Waite. Web- plate-glass windows in the city. some very permanent structures to The rumor snioldered only to be con- berpromptly denied this accusation in a enhance the city and some questions firmed in the minds of many with the response letter to the T[mes, but the On opening day, 1,000 ladies of the about life and success in the peaceful news of the marriage of Henry Webber rumors surfaced once again. town turned out for the gala event and valley. and Julia Nevitt four months later. In 1891, to demonstrate his belief in were each presented with a bouquet of Webber's ftnancial triumph was the pet-manence of Aspen, the miningÂ· nowers. - by Virginia Haberman, Archivist li., 1 ...*.-- - - ASPEN '11/9 -440#,-flf//1],Ilify' : - Uumawd'#4-= =Uy.--9/Vi/, 1 0 ' 9 4 4 -49 HOMES ... . tiataE}amit ' 7 + :~ P 1.1Â¥* ~ W.. .4/4 -lidj.1 4!' Â· - Â· 2 1 : %%00~ ~ 24 - . . :V Ay 75Â» 4 *N / TOUR 9Sliff'I~ ,â€¢â€¢cytr 4 12.4 . 4 4 be 4117>ZYâ€¢kt '*,8'2 '333 :7 + \ ..64.1-tri~ . --141'21 hi>(AM)11]Â·1)16 k- 44*05243' ~1'tili,\.41'1~N 1115~1'()111(2.M)(Mn ,.16' 0 49' ja? r* ANI) /41 -9 Abl,1.N (.C),11,111 TAITY(.ill'R(.11 94 7Â¢,Iff ~rf P ttlt:6:11: "- '<' 4 i-lit44/1~ 1 ..4....... M ./711 mj THURSDAY *:*1,;mgon '1111131 -I AfPR l;i-4 k '170 illietaitar- >Â·r aÂ»kij44Â·rtilbo~x- AUG. 4,-1988 Historical photographs - on display & for sale at * lil:(;INS AT ASPEN COMMUNI'll' GIll jltell Â· 10 "' â€ž, - Â·i";â€ž * SIX VIC.1'ORIAN & CONTEMPORARY I K)USES & GARDENS * COFFEE & REFRES[IMI:NTS AT TOER'S BEGINNING * Tol IR ENDS Wi'ri l 1 11(,1 1 TEA AT 11 Iii WHE. 1.1.ER-STÂ·U.1 ARI) 1 IOUSE MUSEUM Â©)*iouseFilms * FOR AN 1.XTRA ( . 11ARG E, BO X 1.11 N (1 IES W 1 1.1. Ii i. AVA I LA B LE 55 71/LE THEY LAh TAT TI IIi WI i 1.1,1.ER-STALIARD 11 0 litil. M (JSEI IM 303 S. Galena â€¢ 925-7973 e _-7 $13 SPECIAL PRE-PURCHASE PRICE TICKETS AVA l[A111.Ii A'I': Wi lliliI.1: R ()1)12 11A 1 1OUSE BOX OFFICE - ASPEN COMMUNITY CHURCH er:+MB..Elle WHEELER-STAK.LARD HOUSE MUSEUM 9/7 -Ey FLD 2-- ve 05 3;, $ 15 4 )N 1 )AY 01 7'OPR - 10 111: M )101) 9:.4(k2:00 Al"Il l l: CI ll !11(:11 UNI.Y Photo courtesy 4 -/ (please insert this section under "7. Description") The 1891 Webber Block, also known as the Elks Building, is a three story, flat roof commercial building of rectangular profile, of typical Victorian commercial design and eclectic elements such as the corner turret and dome and parapet lunette. Situated on a prominent corner in the center of the Commercial Core Historic District on three city lots, the building ranked third in value in the City when it was constructed, surpassed only by the Wheeler Opera House and the Hotel Jerome. fT'he Webber j Cm:*l dti Block was constructed for $40,000~ of local pressed red brick Tko.-4,9vi,f CliÂ·Â·Â·)(~n JiNJ<Ldw with horizontal bands of rockfaced Peachblow sandstone, ]Suil-di-Ag- ig-z--baygLIong=zon-the=GalenanS treet=el evatien-and bays th.t c uieÂ« 1 StreeL,elevation, and=hes-+ large, Â·imp,Â»se4*e #C L 44 -CaBLO#20,429 4- 616.:. fll U.t<t-f (6aidk 31 Â· )4 5- Â¢19 corner entrance Â¢ @ A large dome projects approximately 18 feet from the corner_parap_et.~ The drum of the dome is clad in pressed 1 ~ tin, the dome roof is painted silver, and a circular ball and ~ ~ spindle railing is located at the top of the dome. Raised "Elks ~ < Building" lettering appears on the turret cornice above the third ~ _floorlevel. 413-Carvedt, sandstone bas relief at top o f square pilasters;~blaborate,i cornice with dental frieze and brackets, ~proj ecting corner turret supported above the store front level by a single large carved wood bracket three=story corner entrance,~' The parapet is carved paneled wood, on west elevation contains bracketed lunette arch in the center, Fenestration: with two one-over-one narrow double hung windows in 2nd & 3rd floor; three bay, with grouping of three narrow one- 4-j over-one double hung windows, then six evenly spaced windows, directly aligned one over the other. with each floor, Large rockfaced sandstone lintels and sills over each. One arched transom window is located on the third floor, directly under the lunette parapet, set in a sandstone arch with voussiors.1 A brick PA corbeled band course runs the length of the west and south 4*1 elevations above the 3rd floor window lintels, below the cornice.J The windows openings are all original, however the sash and frame have been altered. The windows are divided horizontally into threes, the lower 2/3 operable double hung windows, the upper 1/3 fixed. A proposal currently exists to restore the windows. Side walls (north and east el) common bond pattern. Face bric]Â·1~-~ Ky ~ standard stretcher pattern. 41 An interesting brick header checkerboard pattern appealfs-as--a a,6Â£- Ict o.4<C relief panel.y between the 2nd and 3rd floor on both west and south' A I elevation between the grouping of three windows nearest the turret. Storefront: In relatively original condition, painted plywood panels cover foundation at back half of the west elevation, display windows have been replaced, fixed transoms replaced original transoms. Called in 1891 the "Webber Windows", the storefront windows were the largest in the City, measuring 112" x 140" and were 3/8" thick, which were broken and not retained. Painted wood beadboard kickplate panels are located under display windows on south elevation. Parapet, carved brackets; two story vertical square pilasters between each window; circular open dome railing at the top, very large flag projects from center of dome. A brick corbeled stringer course is above storefront below 2nd floor windows along entire south and west elevations. Original storefront system wood frames, Cast Iron columns were retained, decorative "capital" storefront system Storefront appears to be divided into threes, evidenced by window groupings, pilaster placement and cast iron columns. Nine- windmis,-__one__set--of -three-grouped together, and six-- separate -windows- Sandstone foundation and exposed basement wall along partial west elevation ~~~ ~ The craftsmanship of the masonry and stone work are notable. The foundation is laid in (brick bond pattern?) / One arched window appears on the third floor, in the center of -~=n \ the west elevation, ~ih,~tly under a lunetifearchat the parapet. /A 1 /01) / 1 JNT \ / This eclectic element ~in the parapet includes ~arved wood r decorative brackets, and itoppgd with a ball finial. Arched opening is sandstone voussoirs ~u, A narrow (c. 1950's) cinderblock addition was added on the first floor, north (alley) elevation, faced on the prominent west (Galena St.) elevation with matching red pressed brick. The addition is approximately 8' wide by 80' long, and has a slightly sloping shed roof of asphalt. Interior: mostly original, primary entrance way from street to 2nd & third floors accessed up very wide, long stairway. Interior transoms above doors, original doors. Significance: Constructed in 1891 for $40,000 for Henry Webber, one of Aspen';s most controversial and influential business men, who became mayor of Aspen in 1888 on the Republican ticket. Architect William Quayle designed the structure, also designed the Italianate (National Register) Pitkin County Court House. Henry Webber moved to Aspen in 1880, leaving behind a ranch, a wife and two sons, who chose not to join him and later filed for divorce. He was a boot and shoe dealer, remarried, and the new Harriet Webber and her came to Aspen. He began investing heavily in land around the city, he took a strong stand against the Aspen Town and Land Company. Acknowledgement as a leader in the movement to secure the rights of the small lad owner was a positive turn of fate, which served him well in later years. In June of 1881, the community was stunned by the new of the death by strychnine of Mrs. Webber, rumored to be a suicide. Julia (please insert this section under "7. Description" ) The 1891 Webber Block, also known as the Elks Building, is a three story, flat roof commercial building of rectangular profile. Situated on a prominent corner in the center of the Commercial Core Historic District, the building ranked third in value in the City when it was constructed, surpassed only by the Wheeler Opera House and the Hotel Jerome. The Webber Block, constructed for $40,000 of local red brick and Peachblow sandstone, designed in the style, is constructed of local brick and rockfaced Peachblow sandstone. The building is bays long on the Galena Street elevation and bays long on the Hyman Street elevation, and has a large, impressive corner entrance. A large onion-capped dome projects approximately feet from the corner parapet. Carved sandstone bas relief at top of square pilasters; elaborate cornice with dental frieze, curved three=story corner entrance, with two one-over-one narrow double hung windows in 2nd & 3rd floor; three bay, with grouping of three narrow one-over-one double hung windows, then six evenly spaced windows, directly aligned one over the other. with each floor, storefront has been altered, some plywood exists, display windows have been replaced, some transoms removed. Called in 1891 the "Webber Windows", the storefront windows were the largest in the City, measuring 112" x 140" and were 3/8" thick. Parapet, carved brackets; three store vertical pilasters between each window; circular open dome railing at the top, very large flag projects from center of dome. 1 4-4.11 Â£ ... 2-, r a,=4- Â· 41 & G J C, 4<-, C . t , - 7L- . I Â·0' 'i ' 1., , Â¥ f i ALÂ·. A.rt Arod (0* 4 r-" V bidl lulf..4 - 1.7}1\ 1*~~U. ba,J A.~C~L. 7'9 ./,lol.41 - 1 '- Â·7-4~~Â·-46~.u-4 eÂ·k 4,f' 1 46.,it.U L /. I , 4 3/2 . 'LEÂ· . ..A....../Nt, Aff L - 4-77:1 5 ---=34 A 6 1 . 1 / 1 4/ 4 1) r\. It// , J ..,7. 1 8.4- f - 'f ) , 1. -*.4,--....... - , 1 4 i. f k J D'AA 1 1414_ ONL. r 1 # 1-1 -7-1 I --- ,:Er . . 12 r.---6- 4-7Maa . 3 A 'CA '- 9 1 lit 4, , f L .4>tri I 41 4. 0 1, --- 4 0 , u 9Â·.J - 4*tz- 2 4,4. 6 0 :.d mt fÂ· - q i u,~1 ,Â·'C r,<'4 Â· l.Â»+ 'll i.|,A,GJZ] i. 1 i ' f :. ..h ~ c kt- I --1= k Lk 1/11111 : a.1. -1.6-6'r--- e t-244 1% . Â¢ 7 0% 7 9:'V.Â»rÂ»-1.-1-~ / 4 6(, 'f. 5 3. 4r--57737-~-- 2 1,3 U T 1 j AP_2111.2,--.If - 1, A V 4 1 t~ ; r f-TIc : 103ijr, 1 i The craftsmanship of the masonry and stone work are notable. The foundation is laid in (brick bond pattern?) Arches? Significance: Constructed in 1891 for $40,000 for Henry Webber, one of Aspen';s most controversial and influential mining men, who became mayor of Aspen in 1888 on the Republican ticket. Henry Webber moved to Aspen in 1880, leaving behind a ranch, a wife and two sons, who chose not to join him and later filed for divorce. He was a boot and shoe dealer, remarried, and the new Harriet Webber and her came to Aspen. He began investing heavily in land around the city, he took a strong stand against the Aspen Town and Land Company. Acknowledgement as a leader in the movement to secure the rights of the small lad owner was a positive turn of fate, which served him well in later years. In June of 1881, the community was stunned by the new of the death by strychnine of Mrs. Webber, rumored to be a suicide. Julia Nevitt, niece of Harriet's, became the third Mrs. Webber within four months of the death. Webber's financial triumph accomplished through an investment in the Emma lease on Aspen Mountain. In 1885, the Webber's built the (National Register) Second Empire "Pioneer Park" at 442 West Bleeker St. in Aspen's fashionable West End. Henry's business enlarged, he was generous with his new wealth, becoming "among the leaders of charitable and public enterprises". Webber also built the "Webber Building" on Hopkins Avenue, in Aspen's commercial district, how the Isis Theatre. Henry Webber left Aspen in 1904, bound for Utah. The structure had steam heating, electric lighting and "waterworks" in every room. A large open space on the third floor provided a "society hall" for dances and dance school. Allan's Drug Store opened in one of the storefronts in August, 1891. March 21, 1892, Webber block sold to the Molly Gibson corporation, then transferred hands again in May, 1892, being purchased by the Aspen National Bank (President, J.J.Hagerman, owner, Colorado Midland Railroad) purchased the building in spring, 1892, and moved in. The structure became known as the "Bank Building". The interior was described as incorporating the finest quality mahogany woodwork, handsomely carved and surmounted by elegant and unique wrought iron work in Japanese copper finish. Long panels of beveled French plate glass were placed and has the appearance of being frosted. The floor is blue and white tile. October, 1891, the newly formed Aspen Athletic Association leased rooms in the structure. A number of different local businesses occupied the structure: Frank D. Howe, Civil Engineer; D. E. Lutz & Co. (boots and shoes ) ; W. E. Rhode, Justice of the Peace; John H. Bean, Constable and Collector, Aaron Stein, Attorney at Law; Meeting room (called Carpenter Hall) hosted Aspen Trades Assembly, United Brothers of Carpenters and Joiners of America, From 1926 to 1959, the Post Office occupied the building. Narrative from 1920's states building was virtually empty; a blacksmith shop was located to the rear of the building. moved to this corner location. The Elks have occupied the structure since its construction, and finally purchased the building in nrn.elks - .. 1% 9.14 . . ' ' '-fl .. . 1 - i - 81 r. *ti .~y MEMORANDUM To: Streets Department . AlÂ£ 3 1 1001 j Water Department Electric Department Parks Department Environmental Health Planning Office Zoning Office Building Department Police Department From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer Ge- Date: August 31, 1990 3-3 -r Re: Encroachment License No. 3 for Elks Club Building Attached is an application for encroachment licensing of two encroachments at the Elks Club Building. The encroachments are: (1) An existing entry way step which encroaches into the right- of-way and which needs to be increased in size in order to meet building code entry requirements. The existing step encroaches about one foot into the right-of-way. The proposed new entryway steps would encroach about four feet into the right-of-way. Normally we would prefer not to entertain such a request, but in this instance, there is an existing approved encroachment of the stairway well down to Shooters. The new, expanded entryway steps would be in the " Slladow" Of that encroachment and would not encroach any further into the sidewalk that the stairway wall. We discussed with the applicant the possibility of installing a railing on the steps, but the architect said that it was not a code requirement and that HPC did not favor a railing. (2) There is another existing set of steps in the sidewalk along Galena Street near the alley which was the historical entrance to the Elks Club. The applicant wishes to relocate those steps further up the street towards the corner of Hyman Avenue, towards the proposed extended steps discussed in (1) above. These new steps are proposed to extended 2.5 feet into the sidewalk and right-of-way. This would be a half a foot further into the right-of-way than the existing steps, but since it is less than the other four foot encroaching steps, and in light of the previous favorable reception to Elks Building encroachments by Council, the engineering department would not advance any objections. Please return your comments to me by Wednesday, September 5, so that I may write the memo for council packet. I apologize for the short notice on this. Please CEO me your comments if you 9 lil prefer. The encroachment application has been scheduled for the September 10 council agenda. Thank you. cc: Bob Gish, Public Works Director memo 90.145 I , LAW OFFICES OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH PROFESSIONALCORPORATION THIRD FLOOR ASPEN PLAZA BUILDING 533 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LEONARD M.OATES ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 AREACODE 303 ROBERT W HUGHES TELEPHONE 920-1700 RICHARDA. KNEZEVICH ~ August 2, 1990~ TELECOPIER 920-1121 JOHN M ELY OF COUNSEL: JOHN THOMAS KELLY Mr. Chuck Roth City of Aspen Engineer 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Additional Encroachment Licenses for Elks Club Dear Chuck: Enclosed herewith you will find the following: 1. Ten copies of the condominium map for the B.P.O.E. Condominiums. I believe this map complies with the submitted requirements. 2. Reduced copies (8%"x14") of the condominium map (ten copies). 3. Written legal description of the two proposed encroachments. 4. Check for $300. As you are aware, the Elks building is an historic structure which dates back to before the turn of the century. The requested encroachments as shown on the plat are requested to provide access to the main floor and upper floor of the building and are essential for access and Uniform Building Code purposes. Regarding the review criteria, we would advise you as follows: 1. Circulation. The minor encroachment for steps into the sidewalk has little effect on pedestrian circulation and that is De Minimus. Similar encroachments have been there for many years and no problems have been encountered. 2. Street Maintenance. None of the encroachments affect street maintenance. 3. Utilities. None of the encroachments interfere with any utilities. DATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P. C. 4. Enforcement. There is adequate width in the sidewalk for all necessary pedestrian traffic, police and fire department services. 5. Expansion. No applicable. 6. Income Space. Not applicable. 7. Benefit. We submit that this project, the attendant approvals and the encroachment licenses are a benefit to the City of Aspen as a whole. The Elks are in the process of refurbishing and upgrading one of the most historic buildings in Aspen pursuant to H.P.C. input and approval. My clients feel that upon completion of the restoration, they will have a historic restoration the equal to any in Aspen. This restoration is being done totally by the Elks, without public funds. The encroachments, which are essential to the project's viability, are an integral part of the project. If one feels that historic preservation and restoration are a benefit to Aspen, then this project certainly benefits the Aspen community as a whole. In addition, these encroachments address a safety issue. The old doors opened directly onto the steps which is dangerous and violates code. The encroachment is necessary to bring the two entry ways into compliance with the building code and to correct a dangerous situation for the public. I would appreciate as early a date as possible on the City Council's agenda, as it is important we get our financing in place. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P.C. Ill John T. Kelly JTK/klh Enclosures CC: NEW STREET ADDRESS: 215 SOUTH MONARCH S-. ' Alpine Surveys 414 North Mill-Street Post Office Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81612 -- July 19, 1990 89-84 B.P.O.E. Encroachment License DESCRIPTION D. GALENA STREET BLOCK 94 BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT K, BLOCK 94, CITY OF ASPEN WHENCE THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT K BEARS N 14Â°50'49" E 26.35 FEET; THENCE S 14Â°50'49" W 8.17 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE; THNECE N 75'09'11" W 2.50 FEET; THENCE N 14Â°50'49" E 8.17 FEET; THENCE S 75'09'11" E 2.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. E. GALENA STREET BLOCK 94 BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT K, BLOCK 94, CITY OF ASPEN WHENCE THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT K BEARS N 14Â°50'49" E 40.52 FEET; THENCE S 14Â°50'49" W 6.50 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE; THENCE N 75Â°09'11" W 4.50 FEET; THENCE N 14Â°50'49" E 6.50 FEET; THENCE S 75009'11" E 4.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. , I % 1 ,4 1 73 1 C FINAL FL /I OF ME B. P. 0. E. CONDOMINIUM ALLEY' eUICK 9-4 LOTD K. L. â€¢! M, DLK. 44 C4â„¢ OF Ab/EN, CaD,t,â€¢CD C lÂ·INCEMSM~COUNO UTILI--rES IN ALLE. 3 A w %*R L.)1'6~ 1 e 0Â¥NEÂ©t, CEIT-1FMZ*TEE Â· C Blk' ALL MEN 04 -THEAE /REef.NTÂ·> Al 1}45 DE-NEVOLINT C ' RLECTA CAL T~ANS- ~Â£ â„¢~TECT~VE 07:DEM. O, ELft. 4'FEN COLCÂ«22 LOGGE NÂ° 224 ' I /O........:MINT - 4* T T.le =177 J Nti@3*tht-~ -A '9 TUE- CÂ»'NE< Cr CEXT>94 L-AM>5 1/ THEL CIT'l OF /5/IN 'TkN .* -1 Â»1 f ~ ~-~675.09'(10'Â£ .10.274 â‚¬ Â»LI M ./ 14/Ca 1 n- MMm1M- 4 -I>WNS,CTE COF Ab/EN, Ca.,D~'~*22 CPOED HE,CE'*1 CLE--irm COUNT' COLO...( 1. WIT L.2725 K L. < M f51-0:.4 14- lili 47,7/223ig/<5*38525/1125#/ 1/"/15*/LOW?TELE 4- A-fies, 8=1=Â¥=?=i~ _~<-7* c -r-,4 114,â€¢T Tkle ber OF Â»e =rol CDN....1..... ~â€¢e ./EN PKE)/IC-P //lf,UANE TO TUAT CEAT:AN *7'EJ.AENT OF 1/@%*4 4% EF= 21= ~~25*~~% EXEMPTNICN FKOM TRE PEFINITION OF SUPIC),VIÂ·51(N 6~*fÂ·TED 2-1 THE- M/1/ CLITY CCL.t<IL 24 , 1109, 4 Â¥/ / -Ah - 49 OF- TRE RECO~,5 OF TNE CLE~. 4 RECOFOET Cf= pITI<IN CC*Jk,-ry, 'ECD!~060 01.9 114 DOC~<Â· -/I /65- - â€¢ 21 4*4 , 1 -14-lud'Ovf~-i-'-1-1Â£ COLOM~IND 4 Fl'FLE:T- lt, THE PUKf'DOES 91>KIEO UN Â»E 1.r .ECCDM47.13 , )1%, IN //Clt ./I f;Â»/ - -OF- CONG;t>MINIUM DECL/NtÂ«TION POK 1,â‚¬ D FOE CONOOMINIUM U , I O E .981. COL-eK.â€¢â€¢~0 14/1054:. //,-//K-/ //fff. .3333.33332320...323.33333233 N /*21**7-11 - A- 1 - Â»â‚¬152 CCXNT'l MZCOMPe 1% ff 21\ i v.=:p u TEY*ym- -4 C..1. ..r -7 ...>51-E.E. 111\1 Sv J -.Â·T UOUGE. he 272-4 2 27 --134 ./ -1,j't>* , j r.. VICINITY MAP â‚¬,CALE " I *0 CCUNT'! OF /1/K.JN .~5 6 I t 11 \ / ~ -- - t {11 /2/5/0/ Â»4/4,1,71 -19 NE FCME<Zâ€¢OING, 149â‚¬Mrl-NENT *Ge ,â‚¬Kh,L>WLEPSE!3) nift'el 0 111 1 5 ~ // ,/ /1///////// / /// //~ - 31.---2---- /.-j- j. j i~ / MIE TWI-1 _ 51*1 Cr AD CAâ€¢e,KN1*4 Or THE DaÂ«/ C]F Fi/*T-EEL-t CF THÂ·E 15 /06 49/Eri. COLO~.AGO. LOCkbe Ne 224 ASPE}4 Cl-W Couhcli- *PPID/AL wITNE95 >'11 MÂ»10 K OFFICDâ€¢L SMAL 7 /,/10//O /4 -THE CITI C/ /5/IN CUP! COUNCIL CN -TRE TH~â€¢9 CON[bM(NIUM 7L,â‚¬T OF THE e>POE. CONCOMINHUM W/ M-! CDMb.11Â«nON EXPIM25 ir ~ / 1 \ i /9 41.7 _ C.,1 OF- Ie,9, 1-105'/ . I ..'ll ./.2.Willi Ha -------.14~-~-~----7, 'f:f ~ / 1 49 -04 / / AD/Ee- SIGNED -Â»19-//"/ , Ile'f NLODÂ«â€¢1 n.jit>LIC Z â€žH V L, RMM . fr - ,% 2 Â£ w- 2-eMENT- m f // / / 1 9/. \./ IU f V" /~/~< ' TH=EE Â·9Â·70.-f MASCNIM eUIL.ON- / / / / TrrLE CEKI,FCATE / / / â€¢-ne ELe> RUILOINSÂ· 9 / / . Ii' DW CK â‚¬ Â£Â·r-resT Fll-KIN CaNT, TITLE, 1610.. 4 CUL'l 1-ICENDED *.lil.12</ATE 1 2 0 I O//Ell. IN FEE fMFLE OF- 5 PO E Carâ‚¬Â©MINIUM DITUATE / M Â· E.V.*' ...T A CITY CLE/j<. MEN-T ,61 THE 67>VEE 7- Ca-DIA[O NOml,4 CEPITNFIE75 TY LAN Tâ‚¬ 25 '0& 46/EX COLCXACD. A-OUGE- b/ 1/4 5 Fil Crâ„¢ ENS,NELE]43 0Â»1: COUNT'f Of MITK{Ki. ST>U-r- OFÂ· CCL.CF~CO IN L_016 K., L * el. M,LOCk ~14. DTM 4 TDV,Sl-TEE O'F-,AE,FE:N, >*re /. COL.oe4;0 50 HEKE.e,q ,tr/govE -Th,19 CCMX>MIN 2/hA Or 'ECOK. 5.IED T- 0-mt EkleiNEEA -3.0,1-'1 Or â‚¬.LeJECT la EASIME-//72, FIG+G#-Or-*eÂ·t â€¢1 ENCUMCIRL<Illf PLAT Or 11â‚¬ E> r O. E CeNCeÂ»,IN,/M, PITKIN CDUNT'f TITLE INC / 7-44- .D Thil,_C&Â·41 OF 1101 494 :///1 *1 / Ill j a C*l VICENT J rliGEN,15. Cl-74 ENg Nem-85 'FK//1 /Er4-T- 01-ATE CF COLÂ·OMACÂ© , CLERN< 4 RECCr-PET'Â·57 /CCEP'TÂ»*ZE-: CDLNPI OF- RTKIN ~ 6 6 11' A/. ' I k 8 Tirt /Lyâ€¢IT le ALED FIN //CO~C' iN THE Cr;FiC.EL OF -The TIE fÂ©MES,DING INOT#UMEN-r WÂ¢AD,ACKNOWLEC,SE.O REFIKE ring. COUNâ„¢ CLO<K- 4 +ECD,OET Ar_o'Cla:j<-_ M . .E ./19_ F. O/ , [Â·129, Mrf VICENT J MIGENÂ·b 1 $ 1 h ami / /~~/~~ ~/ ~~~ ~ ~ INFLITE %01.- gr /â€¢6ED -KEZErnON Ne- M COMN[195,14 EXFF/,25. Â»2 --2-1 0 , 1189, 4 8 xecn'<OÂ£0 4,5 F//SJOEVE- câ€¢Â· PITTI-Nâ„¢TITLE, iNICL 4 y/'TN//5 /9 5-*/ / //FIC-Ill â‚¬2Â£/1- ,6 ...... 'EC.yE>/A / 035 ./' 4- 1 KIC//49 rUe>L/C- g;;Ele:Eee tâ‚¬r IZEDWA I U.F ,Â£ . 41- 0 2, -#-1741* '475-aeli~ ~/, . e m eURVENâ€¢OKÂ» CENCTIFIC,Â«TE: 4 V..MT- 'ICE.% I. CÂ» [ aL F 6/1-KINZIE, MEXE,91 CE-~Crlf-M /64â‚¬r- 1,4 -07 4 5//re//Ef, 1-1. A 5:UKv'El Â¥/9 F'E~FOKMEP UNIDE< Mâ€¢1 PIKECT'/ON 4 allr/-Mt'Ar>13,4 CF L.-Crb A, L / M, NGO< 9/. Cl-â„¢ 4 TOâ€¢,~IMTI cor Am. Ca.OK,â‚¬Â¤ TMAT FE THMEEâ€ž_ / â‚¬,T'OM,1 MectÂ«,1 15Ull-011Â·WS:, WÂ»!b FrOUND -ID IX- MATE!Â£7 .4, ANDEG=XN. .... ..... L..E) 911.-1 HEKEEN. n.+15 LaD.rrION 4 PIWIE.510649 .F -THI 0 4 d le 14- 3/ v mEr DCLAID*89 L(NEED. UTILIT IC), iMf'Xe,EMENT') 4 EARÂ£Â»fENT,7 HYMAN Â· AVENUE. IN 21/1/ENCE OIC KNOWN -TO ME ..2,5 ,iCCUM.â‚¬I-ELLM ef-le,A Â·5'C.AÂ·LE >~' . 0,1 IN -TI-,S M.AC 4 TBAE AOr ACCUILTS_V .1 SUISTâ€¢NTIALL_-1 I 748 FT ....) r,ble CF ' INE,â€¢2 FOOK.10 CIr'l MONUMENÂ·15 9 W. COKÂ·NE'~. 9/,CT':7 -THE LOCAT[CN CY mâ‚¬ COILD,KG 4 -Thâ‚¬ VE,JUDAL- 4 PbUPCK- 44 4 N W. Câ„¢NEM~ rt./04< *95 (1.14'60'49â€¢W 7400'). 4*NT>4- O!MENDDNâ€¢'5 7 -rhâ‚¬ iNE,14/1 CUAL_ .Al,C YAG UNI-TD OF THE f!5 /O/ CONEUMINIUM 1-HEKEIN 4 TMERCCI~ E~ICNMeNT- .WEENSâ‚¬Â· 6,i/ILIBI I,1 kele/LICTLON CF THE UNCT C>Â£25!GC+AJECONS THâ‚¬LKECrâ€¢ UNOE4 -mE [NtmCUCTIONÂ·5 CCITI OF'.eDPEN C.4TM COUNI,1-, TE*<XL>/[09 41 PROVIDED ME rE:,4 -rt. CWheÂ·A. T.. MEAturflMENTÂ» Cr 5,Â«10 UNIT, 4 -THE EL-EÂ·VATCONe IFÂ· THE FLCÂ©et f CE[LINGÂ« 549 4./// +270 ,/CCUMACTE,21 CPEFICID ALL. EN<IrÂ»â€¢CHMENTb 5Â·t ,- ON -TWE 5U1â€¢5JECT PROFEMUM. Rua 2E 9 ME-ZI,1 Mvs m Prn<IN CaNTM TlTLC FOUCH 64. 3 FIX *001-noNAL Â£45 OF NECO,/9 1/.449 0Â©NE). EXECUTED TH(5-947 OF , t~le't. A L / 1 N E SU ~ n/E f t, 1 NL - 84 CWNIEL F. MN<ENZIE. L.,7 2>lei Alpine Surveys, Inc. Surveyed 0 20 29 (u'laTI) Revisions R 1101 Title CONCOMI.1 UN,r .1,7 DREET oNE oF 1-WO Job No 24 - 84 - - - - - Drafted ..30 M P. . 5 .0 Rst Office Box 1730 Clier* 75/0.E 717. ~9'65~ 81612 MEMORANDUM To: Elyse Elliott, Engineering Department From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Elks Building Encroachment License Date: February 8, 1990 I find that the request for Encroachment License is reasonable, and that the historic precedent has been set. The Galena and Hyman Street elements that encroach have been associated with the building for many years. Their removal has not been requested by the HPC. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING COUNTY OF PITKIN ) I, Ed Irwin, being duly sworn, state that, on October 13, 1989, I mailed by first class postage prepaid, a Notice of Public Hearing before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee, Aspen, Colorado, to all adjacent property owners of Lots K, L, & M, Block 94, City & Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. 62 au - Ed Irwin 0/ - STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 8th day of November, 1989, by Ed Irwin. Witness my.1~MEhnd official seal. SHERI L Ue- 1 6/07 VAI~e Sheri L. Vail 4 Notary Public ~~Â»i;+OFÂ·Â·iiÂ·~ifÂ§'~ - HAGMAN YAW d ARCHITECTS ~ Cen, 44Â£14 - Il (J...'I"'ll Â¥1915 = 6 11.1.1 k H --- - 1 It n 7.41 0 r '== 7 - , 2-7 7 0 = 1 '14 1 21 E LI in.2.1-0.-a-11-lilltl-1114M-li--1 2,8.-a=a=.ELB=M==ML==eL=t?m==rL==Hl Eji*fl#i#-Â£Â£E1-4Bâ‚¬a=G*-2Gg~*7_21~*LE===F/-. 7 6-= - - 1/R//1/1//AFHAFI/191/1*EFM -0 - r---t- - -5, r 1 -1 1 1 IC- 1 IF==1 -1 4 1 u E O F L] m '~ ~~~~E_~_.E~ LIL 12'~- ]UIN---~-!-1 1 0 n--1 1.-n ' I / -R LM] 11 1 ./1 '- H-- -111 'IiI' El 11 0 0 11 W EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 4. ice, 4; . i - 01~ 11+03-2-LEÂ©1 %-11Â» U=a 4110 p-----â€ž+--, - --ift=**4-22*~ I *1*zi Fl~ _1:/-0*~~Ii -4139*9~*ffÂ«4 UJ"Â«r--Il 2111 -2 32_ â€ž - -- _wEE_ELEVAI!ON _- _ NORTH ELEVATION L_LLL2211= E-ELLZLLLU r.,-cf 6-,Â·e AS BUC ELEVATIONS Al==7-1 . Ill.Ll ~*H H]Ill[f _11 iLE[]1 p 1 1 1 111.11- - 2 ....1867 HAGMAN YAW - ARCHITECTS LTD $ I.....LE. - PEN COU)UDO#lell _ ALLEY .. L--1- - I - NEW STAIR/ELEV. TOWER _Ilammi~ - 1 MASON & MORSE BUILDING ~4'.- a 19-] ! ISSUE: '/ 4 ~ | 'xCANOPY ABOVE -- REASK)INS: UNDSCAPEDAREA 19 94 /// 44 1/ I - L_J LI F > --1-2 HYMAN AVENUE SnE PLAN - SCALE: 1/0Â·' â€¢ "Â« 1-1 11I11'1111 GALENA STREET . C 1 9 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS U . :MCCâ„¢ CALEM L WE:')LORM' 4 2 mgo:887 . . 2.ilf "11: ..0.,-E---2,".=.."rng 11 1 1 ' - 11~~iiÂ¤ZilIWEIEFICEEIFRE 1 -- 1- 1-- 11 - 91- 1- -751-- -1 - - , I i f~ Â®-1 ' Il Ti m -1 1 -1.,1 ri L'-- 2 : C ~I 1 _1-1~ -4 m IN "81 01% 0 7 11 EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION lhâ€¢,-O' i.#.0 -T 7-1 +793=2 ME-99â‚¬~Â»EE] - REVIKÂ»6 kE+-12,1~-~*1=1-101-i=Bm Alj14241_-6 rip--~- [2Â«2 375*Er-%*Fi- d Â·1 1 - F=1 -EP - 9 -Â«12=00Â»- ---t332@33832Rel 1 1.Ail 1 1 j9==Le=g= f 4=22-- _1 - [ --=== ~1111-0~ 11 ; - -4 -==1-------------------- 11 ~1 12===62 1 , - i--1 :,4 m '13~LILL=7-22- 1.-2 2 .~ -- 1-- i- I--.4 - - *-*-n - -- -- WEErr ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 1 1 , 1. T.,10. g.,43 AS BUU ELEWATIONS 0 1 . 1 1 1 1 . . . . . 1-1 lilli?M~illi-EJi-[1111111tlil_lihi . HAGMAN YAW - ARCHITECTS - :lon~ALE' - ASB COLO.0011011 ...7 4 -Il Ill'Id-dilill~"lili 11. 1 ~~_2Â·â€¢w~EZE~xx=y=--2,EEn~~*==her-Â»-~ I - --------- n{Lit-lt-[Fli- 0- -*LiFIL 1-L33=--gâ€ž~~~__~ffEES,' ,Â·-- ENT!// BU[LI)t/G KXT. = - - R# guING P.*000 1-44 94-Â·Lk-67 Â·Li_tir-~427-4/a:Ir '' r--1,-6=f-4-Â·-44-trall 19 9 t= LC / 1 ' ' ' Â· -Ni)-IN-9. REP~-Ew,â„¢ #4~=M-4 .ir#_'ir-11Â·==-~[T-~1]F~[ I.11[=~f Il=:~lrt.t-lj__ita/ ~Cl~D -- I- NKW STOREFRONT AND KICKMATE AL==.zbL=.,EL...lhL._Ek_.=t:~iz_c~==_hht_L.=Â».+===_-=-...â€ž-,2--,2'U' - 1-- LU - ' ------=crz-u~ __+~+~3~~93=9~73==i AND POINTED _ - SIMILAR 10 TH' TRIA'll.MT 4-1 - - r = BRKA gain.AR 04 0.1 b ./. 0, GBOUND ~LOOR UVEL - - - - - cOLOR TO :xer BLDG ' i ttl-Utt_1- =' r== - 1 -- - 1 1 - 1 'r-11Â£Ei - -EL- Li -bÂ· 2 -- i i - 1 -1 11 ~ C P T~Aou,C-CANOPr ill U 11 , 1 L =EAE-Â§1!aNION ..EMIHELEVATION NEW IrAOVELEV. TVVER -r- EAUVELEV. TOWER BEVIANT 6=4 ' <T-- /' 1- 1 - -4 1-*-1-1 .=1 W 0Â» i ISSUE: 1 =9 - 1==CIE~ ,-+ --EE- rigiSIONJ: --- -1----= =â‚¬*--141 W==14 W M H--1-71 Fi_-1 ~ ~ 1 --duls-~1 --=3[_ =*:-*Â»Â·Â·--7 U-i LJ _U - LJ_ 1--I -clUU-22! 2 -=ra- - ==E=~~ZIJI~rEIA F--1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 - W ---1 -El - ff__ - â‚¬ - 4 1-= 41 ~ -~1:/ 5-3,/ -- - 8_9123~~***~**~~_al~~~~i R.ROOF ANO PAINT ArrACHID BLOCK STRUCIRUE - -- ...........I- --- - WEST ELEVATION - NORTHELEVATION -- PROPOSED ELEVATIONS -1 - HCALE: 1/r - 10-/ PETTTT-rTTT- 1- 11_11 1 ~ ~111111-IL E ZEZES Z - HAGMAN YAW - ARCHITECTS - A Sd-IH IALEXA - UPE' COU)Â§,t000;MI 10] . 2867 ALLEY L-L 494 r= VW I . ,- NEW STAIR/ELEV. TOWER ELKS BUILDOÂ«1 -9 1-1- 1 MASON & MORSE BUILDING --- 1 L= 1- 1 ISSUE: ~ '3-CANOPY ABQ. 6, 47 L r k I UNDSCAPED AREA .i- lut e 1 1 11 - El 11 1 4--1* - 1 3 1/ i 0 . HYMAN AVENUE SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/8" I 'Â·-Ir lili'11111 GALENA STREET . 1 ===4 '43 '4Â» 1 10 - HAGMAN YAW I ARCHITECTS LrD - 2105OCTHGUE'A 4 Â£ CCXOR~8lbil Lu >03 925:11 11,1,1 ..1 R~d~/=.I-.d-/7/~niO.=fÂ£/.--=1-4 . 11 1 11 - 1 1 1 . -5 7=---'*2 - -1 1 ' i 1 1'[ 'CZVE n 7- 1. -1 9 r , i ~' 1-- 1 1-1- Li- - '- E - 1 0 2 - 4 .31Â© Al 10 1 UN EASI' ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION ,_r I_=i--.- - 1 ' 7. V--0 1 0---1==77Â»Â« F_fjtletÂ«t] - 4!EL_ REVISIONS. l==:==7-==F!---F~Ii~=EMÂ»1--1-q-iE'--[=1 #0,20/Al-gUK-*Â«' 64 E- tÂ«=---8.Â«22*t=~11 4--17~zi~ Â· liiiiwrfilerlimmill-=Mailail 1-22 kah--===--------~ 97% 1-r=11 E--1-4 1--L. -- 4 -r--- ~ - 11 1 - -U-- 1- t:==e:~E~-IzzurazÂ« ==*aaÂ£=ei== a~~ Mitiwn-fL WESr ELEaTION NORTH ELEVATION r.,-Cf g.,1-0, AS BUICr ELEVATIONS 1 1----1 ill-lillilll'~t-EÂ«-[-N]IN HAGMAN YAW el n 4 ARCHITECTS - Lrn : 10 Sol.TH GtBA - - 96 COLOILIM' 6- 101 925 2361 r=~========z=====zz=:===;p/IZLN*~~~:~~~~---~r~z#g2~:22bg2-1~ -- Rlâ„¢OV. EX'ING mOD 1.-1,=-li_Â· "Â·-~-tlr- it.lar-ti=tmll,gr=nir-Lir- r.-2- .1-, - .-tr==i --)/91 ./--ENTIREBUILING ./. - ~ _ _- SAN~BrON~ 8AN1/ M-i ~r, !2*I _ViL-#%4541 I TO RE CLEANU Â· - --- - rL.1 iIi I-- r L -, 1 11'i L= It LL=10 - I ..wsm-Ki.... D.,CK-ATE | |L~I |*11 1-Â» L( 11]' '[-11 - BRICK TO BE TUCKED ~ - SIMILAR TO rH E TRI,ATME ,(T r-r--1-Y----2~1 t=S----r"WEEL-1/ AND POINTED ~-r--[Er[3 1,!L -1 11- -, 1- - I I - - Cot,OR TO./.r. BLDG - 1 8/*1 501/.LR / S./ I \ 1 Â£1 11--fl 'Lli [Irt. itz; St, tu 17 1 I Ir:41 - 1 1 - *- &a |' 1 .--1 1 L- 1 1 -- - f p n.-,1.=z.~cul-1 - 11 - 1 Il EASTELEVATION ..EEHELEVATION 1 NEW FrAIR/ELEÂ¥ TUâ€¢VER SELEV. TOWER BEYOND 1 1 i 3%**=======JF~r-2-- REVISIONb ISSUEÂ· -- - 1 f~IE~-~i ~ I -- R.ROOF AN' PA[NT .....O .......... -- --- -- .1 1 4.-1 ~11 IF. - 1. -Im. -I --1-~i~-_ --- - I , .- ---_..-_Ur--~ LJ---~--2 -2~Jt R.U./TE MI./ 1.rP----' WEEFELEVATION _NORTH ELEVATION PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SCALE; 1/r â€¢ 10Â« 0 *..\4. - MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Landmark Designation: The Elks Building (Webber Block) 210 South Galena St. Date: June 14, 1989 LOCATION: 210 S. Galena St., Lots K, L, and M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen APPLICANT: The Elks Club #224, represented by Ed Irwin APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Landmark Designation for the 1891 Webber Block, now known as the Elks Building, located at 210 S. Galena. HISTORIC EVALUATION RATING: Exceptional, eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places SUMMARY: The Elks Will be submitting an application for Significant Development in the near future, which will include a proposal for an exterior elevator shaft, similar to the Wheeler Opera House, and some minor exterior renovation work. The Elks Club will be relocating to the third floor; the remainder of the building's use will remain virtually the same. PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW: Landmark designation is a three-step process, requiring recommendations from both HPC and P&Z (public hearing at P&Z level), then first and second reading (public hearing at Final reading) of the designation ordinance by Council. An application for GMQS Exemption is required to be submitted, which may be approved by the Planning Director (Ordinance #16, Series 1989). HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS: The Standards for Landmark Designation are found in Section 7-702(A) of the Land Use Code. Any structure or site that meets one (1) or more of the standards may be designated as a Historic Landmark. Staff finds that the application meets all six (6) of the Landmark Designation Standards. Standard A. Historical Importance: The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event Of historical significance to the cultural, social or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. - Response: The Webber Block was considered the third most important structure in value to be built in Aspen during the silver mining era. It was built for $40,000 by Henry Webber, who came to Aspen from the east as a shoe and boot merchant. As his business grew, so did his prominence in the community. Webber was also responsible for the construction of his home, Pioneer Park (400 W. Bleeker) and the Webber Building (now the Isis Theatre). 210 S. Galena was the location of many of Aspen's service-oriented businesses, including the 1892 Aspen National Bank, Allan's Drug Store, attorneys, engineers, etc. The Post Office was located here from 1926-1959. The Elks purchased the building in 1912 for back taxes. Standard B. Architectural Importance. The structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct or of traditional Aspen Character. Response: The Elks Building has long been considered one of Aspen's finest Victorian-era structures, massive in form and material, eclectic in design, and unique in detail. The Elks Building is a significantly distinct historic resource to Aspen's Commercial Core Historic District, and a visual landmark since its construction. Traditional Aspen materials (red brick and Peachblow sandstone) speak clearly to its heritage. Standard C. Architectural Importance. The structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type or specimen. Response: While traditional in Victorian massing and form, this structure embodies unique eclectic details making it one of a kind! The prominent corner entrance, topped with a projecting turret and corner dome with balustrade, and the lunette arch centered at the west elevation parapet are elements which best illustrate the structure's unique style. The masonry craftsmanship is excellent; unique brick detailing (corbeling and "checkerboarding") appear between the upper floors at the predominant southwest corner. The cornice and parapet detailing are also significant details. The structure is a three-bay design, with a balanced fenestration pattern to enhance each bay and provide the upper floor rhythm. The storefront design is relatively unchanged, with the exception of the new windows recently installed for the main floor Esprit retail space. Standard D. Architectural Importance. The structure is a significant work of an architect whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Response: We find the historic Webber Block clearly meets 2 . this Standard. The structure was designed by architect William Quayle, who also designed the Italinate Pitkin County Courthouse, two of Aspen's most significant historic resources. It is interesting to note that both interiors have also remained relatively unaltered in 100 years. Standard E. Neighborhood Character: The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Response: The Commercial Core Historic District's integrity consists of magnificent structures such as the Webber Block. Aspen's very image is founded on these irreplaceable historic resources. We find that the preservation of this building speaks to the heart and soul of our community, and are very encouraged with the pending renovation plans. Standard F. Community Character: The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Response: Aspen's Commercial Core has a distinct character which is unmatched by most other resort communities. Galena Street contains eleven of Aspen's most significant historic resources; their preservation is essential to the character, image and vitality of our entire community. The Planning Office commends the applicant for seeking Landmark Designation, and encourages the sensitive and careful renovation of the structure to insure its preservation for decades to come. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC recommend approval for Landmark Designation of 210 South Galena Street. memo.hpc.210sg 3 Â· 6-.di:Fr Flia/*i t/./* HAGMAN YAW ARCHITI S, LTD ...f 210 South Galena Sui... 24 [LIEFF .__- E Â®[F F[EA[46[ROFFA[L ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DATE /6 Â·3/ 31 JOB NO. (303) 925-2867 ATTENTION Fn/Mut[ L r-U F RE: TO filrth 9* by- bw- Apr -ECks 8 li~ V U 4. .1 WE ARE SENDING YOU D/Attached m Under separate cover via the following items: C] Shop drawings C] Prints m Plans El Samples m Specifications E] Copy of letter [3 Change order rl COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 ral-Ud 77 li CA-tiok. 1 Ar- f & 7 e knk;-n.6 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: E] For approval C] Approved as submitted C] Resubmit copies for approval m For your use E] Approved as noted m Submit___copies for distribution - C] As requested [3 Returned for corrections [3 Return corrected prints [3 For review and comment [3 m FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US f REMARKS 80-*AN\N- 1 6- try W.d red,ucd Ul hle#-31 <f P 1%4 164W i (Alt ut,t- 9(.P 1/ke~ DUk. Â£ 4.U p --~Akt . IÂ¢4Â£,ST u- C[ 9/,/ i (MAM T pln4 0 f/\1-M veÂ«9 COPY TO SIGNED: Ak<]3- bÂ·04 PRODUCT 240+3 1//s71â€¢c, Groton, Mas 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. V a HAGMAN YAW OCT - 6 ARCHITECTS PROJECT MEMORANDUM LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 To: Roxanne Eflin, Aspen Planning & Zoning From: Michael Doyle Nt) Date: October 3, 1989 Re: Elks Building, Significant Historic Development Application Attached please find the items you requested to complete our application. 1. Representative letter from Ed Irwin. 2. Vicinity map of the project. 3. Three sets of the drawings, reduced to letter size. We have also completed a massing model for preliminary review by HPC which we understand has been moved to November 8. Please call with any questions. r 0.#A G +21 }1-444 P ,.../. 11.Jf *40*.4 <0'3(-131 A ji 4 f No L f 1 Aspen Elks Lodge % 4 210 S. Galena St., #21 Aspen, CO 81611 Lodge 920-4384 Office 925-3516 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Aspen Elks Lodge #224 a Colorado non-profit corporation, has appointed me to be the representative authorized to act upon its behalf. The address and telephone number are listed above. Sincerelyi- (50 4#31, Ed Irwin Trustee Chaitman ill-1-1] 11'l W lilli 1171 1 ~Â·Uhz-------1-8, r 1 -- 4 - = 1 Â¤4- .-' - + CPUE)) rat i - irptr:, ~21 r f _1 z 1 . E $0<4' J , L - l.:-1.1.Ill Z H ' 1 I 6-11 i n-,1,1 - 1_ 1 LLI 1 I (p D'611 HERR Iptia i u VP / 200E- 30bEl 400E 0 E' ~< 600E ..r.---1-: X 1-. ..0 .... 1:7 0 0 E *1 - -, -â€¢- - -1-1/ - H H 4~ Â«U Abl I. \4 -1-1 .- I i .1 - hi 1 - * --rl~ 1 ; -i + 732--64 = . I la. 6 !,r 1 IH 1 +1. 10 It i-, t~-t| i bliA,V 14 E. --HOPKINS AVE.z.6 *4Fil - L . tr -1 , ----/.9 - , , 1, 'IN .4 6- .1 1 A I i J ' i -Ii 3 69 . Tl -I-.(E~ - - ' 41- aH |7'47 ---Ill i/ -/ .........+ . '- - I. ...... --- - :r - - -0 1%15~ 1 H H EH h .H , 02 97 -. r. Â· Uy Â·Â·Â·Â·-17, T ---1- 32- Vpda fIHIS PROJECT i : - 4 -- - + -F 3.9 E, 4 HYMAN . AVE. 1. 1 - - r 0 9, i H .A w 121 Z . E M iii 1- .. 2 Zâ€¢ W' i LP I 1-It i 4 0 0 0 - I. F41 6. ~- WAGNER E. 7(Â¥R AVE. -------1-=60 L /TR- 0 r--1- \ ' . '------m~---_1 :Â·â€¢ - ... , m 1 -' ' Â· tu D) (D,T,H,) ' 1 1 AÂ¢AC)/ 2 PARK 2 , 1 f.*) 1- , 1-/ V 1 -- - CL Nt n 1 ~ Nt 1 1 1-- ' CURANTâ€¢- AVE. i'.In , i i 1 . 1 1~1_1.1~|rottl [~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~ 11|11 1~~~ ~ 1 -"#CLI 11'~lil I'l'19 11 It 11 1 Ill_1~ I I Ill i [-J I - INGMAN YAW -i ARCHITECTS -1 t. ..Ill' .. . . WI:[21,1.'11 _ ' 1 0.- -1 ALLEY Â· .- 4 - El.K'S ('11111 REMO!)El. 0. 2, . I i , ,Â·: 1-. . _.2 MASON & MORSE BUILDING = -u = Ul 11'E 0, â€¢ooâ€¢ A-R v ~ ASPEN. 1 1, -\1 (01.ORAIJO -- - 68 0., RE'.1SK>NS: 9 - V 1.â€¢' \ T LAM~Câ€¢MD ARmA - 8 '%'' A ./.ti' U . I. , 11[111112'f. 1-3Â«- 8 ..1 Â· 'IfÂ·~Â·:.I': 3 :-:.'~Il. 51*Â· '.ilt.. . . I HYMAN AVENUE SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/80.â€¢ 1'4 111111 11 1: 1 ,Â·JÂ·' I . 4 ' , , . ...ED. 14% , ," . L I. LF t. . : }4772 3.- ' '. 2. 4 'Â£;0 . 9 : 9 l.th 7 '1 '.Wit , ..Â· Â· ' , , 3 a GALENA STREET t.-. . 9 - I{AGM.AN ~AnÂ· 2 ARCHITECTS r=1 1 litkim-+-.-~T-~rn~*~=El - i Â· -LIE 1~.~ujM-~-1~-~~-~u~u.-f .~t--t*--$-- --5. ./ --- tE~ - --4- .--- U e , Irâ‚¬7'1Â«~ ' - F 74 r i: 4 9,404 EXISTINGPLY~OD - 1 :TIL H' TLD[/G EXT Â£ ./ mk 1.... -*t- ~ - -LL -. 4 2. __yti>=1 - ~-lt-- , TO .1 CLE'.D TrÂ·~,~ Tf 1,~ â€¢Ak ~LA-~L. ---- .kICK 'MIL.'R I S'. AIP ~-- - 0010. ICI Exis"1.3 ..lt k S .114. TO .Hy........r - '23=2 -1- 2 ~--+- - Ffil .jia,-[ !1 3211*l,J#-NIF-)1 ~ - - -- - ..riCWGROUNDFI,OORLEVEL ~T-7- :=* -.- _.r- E-r~ar=FJf,F-' -73, L.. I./ -1 lil' 71 E _r ij 1--' -' _ul. _ _ ..1 133 - u L.Â»c=cl~~ij ... . Inwi=%~P+1=17[7113Fit~[tfFEFF~414 PEMI Ill n M M 11 9-it=ll El O wIL.-lwiN LI]-11 - - -- -]flrl ----- .-1 0 - - 1 - _-EAMELEVAI12N ..Eylli-ELEM%DON__~ , .......L~....(WER 1 0- 11=.1 --~~FFIL-1-9 -__ 14 - Fi MI-ff- Â«-I -- -un E4_- -1==;zw H = 1 2=1 1 pl _11= B -- - ' FA -- m 4- -11- Â»----- - - r-IN-jv- RAISM NS: P. I Ta' u .'w. - H - - NE~ ~A!R/EL-EVAm. Li1 - ~1,11 -3--grra n -r - BLOCK ST.ler,(l , <-437 -- .F.00, A. l .11.1 ...... ..5 p N -I--- Â£ 1-3 4271 - - - - --Ii-- - - cAL--1 1 - F .1.L~ L REL,OCATE EXmriNG // ---- DOOR AND MICH EQU~. - -WEr-ELEVERN -NORTH-ELEVAMON ---.---- PROPOSED ELEVATIONS E.ALE: 1/r' â€¢ 1'40 U rT--7--T-TJ-1-" - ARCIIITECTS I -- HAGMAN YAW - ITD Wl'â€¢ i 0111'A[Veâ€¢Ii kne * ALLEY - -----~-- ...----- - 4-- ./.1 I- 2..9 .* 411' ...; U fil 1 5'. 1 . El.K'S 1. 1 t ('1.1IH i %/4 'TÂ·~.:. . :t... Â· REMO!)El. ' 14-Â·4'.1 ..... Â·Aâ€¢4 Â· . --2-1- / . , ti E --68 MASON & MORSE BUILDING - -- _T *Rifiym'W ... 01 . B ' 1, 0 --7 ASPEN. COLORADO - 964 N 2 41 ./ "â€¢.g' .Â· -- 69 REVISKIN L~.NUSCAMD AUA a M r ; ..... :34 I .:< C .4 1 71.I.. - Â»ItÂ«4Â«- 1 -:i + - U - 'rz\ --+ 4 ..... 41 :_13 1 01 HYMAN AVENUE SITE PLAN SCAU 1/8â€¢0 â€¢ 1'-[r' 77 I lilill Â· . 1: r . j.'* f, 4 , . ' GALENA STREET 3 -5- - 7 lillill I-[ rf 1 FT-- --- -~- - - - CV-h,- 1111 ..r.,---- ~~ 1 1 11 111 .11 1 11111 11%11 ' 1 ,1 1 1[111] L22 1] : 1 ./.ULL 1 -mÂ¥i - ' TE ~ 111111 1 1 111111'In =1=-==11~ UZ{~ 1 11 '9 â€ž'' ir, U:,iÂ· ibilÂ·l %:1.11 1 1,11 :9 6*9/*26mma 11 11 11 4 11 ~1 14 . 1:1 J.1 2 4 4 ' aulli ''11'll':"011|'1 ' I|~,i 1 I leiâ€žIL , D I 1111111~ 1~l'11111; 11 'I l ili ~11'13"F ']1111 i 11 I 11 1 4il-qmnrIP - â€ž-1.-=' 1111'Ir=1-111([TLM'Ii' C 11 4 *=TAL .'rT--p -C MI I Ill(1171 0411 11112-_LU . 114.11 ill LLILIlli It: - 1 0-11 11,411 -/ .- 'i,t~1~1~ 1 1 1- 1- 1 - 1- .. -- 1- 111 :11~11Â¢ 111 1 - . - 1-- 1; 111 -1 11 111:1 14 3 1 -1.-1 OIl ! 4 lili i 1 3 -:-- i )1 -'- 24~'IMP- 0 1 '11,111111111'11; '1 11Iljl'll'111~ I +(T~~ 313 -2 -00 8 -ILL < 14 1 m 4- ~ ,~ UVilll i.j ' IM,IIA NE ' MIWI Illoill te I , , 11 ~1111111,11~I'll lili j - 1- =11411+7 'Ell E , : 4111111111 1 lil il 1 11111111 Fo~F , 1 ~ lili 1 1 0 ~,1 ~1 ~1111~11'gr T 7 , ~f 01 i '|~'~||lili -1/"1101[UL - . j. ARCHITECTS 1 :SNOISIA31 SN0LLXA313 runiI SY ELEVATION NOLLM\3113 H.LHON - HAGMAN YAW Z 4 - ARCHITECTS L . Â«Unt ' ......:Il'.r k.â‚¬.>r- 11 11,0 . - I - 11 11 11 12 -- ENTIRE BUILDING EXT. ~ ~- - NEW STA~. E. VATOR ":'&.'.[i:'::Tu7: F__237&72, El-' ~-4-IN] 5 1-5, 1,12, i --- - 70â€¢FITO IF ....GATID - 1 - Â·- 19. 11 2 - _ *mBEFRONT A41) K ICK-TE a -_ Â· ! 1 - 1- 3 L -IIi l si'ILAITOTHETRIAâ„¢ENT 3 -- --ir- : U.-'-~ ~~ -- - . - - P - - - C k-T OF .OUNDFLOCI LIVEL - /_- _ . ~ ._ _ - -_ _ _. _ -12= COLOR TO EXISTING .10.11 -- 7- - - -*#'- 1,-1 = I f BRICK TO BE /:CKED 3 - 2 = b.:CK ....R INS.Â¥ All - 1 L' 1 --= -1' Ir-1 - L_I] - I ' - C]' :-i. 2 ' ' -I ---]Â» 5.-42.- - 3 i-li Z. - r.......- L= 1- - U - - - -1-10 1 , 9- 7 -- r 11 . i 2 010 'I, 1 1,~11,11 1, 111'LU 1 1 , - 1 0 ..EAKI=ELEVATION~ -SQUIHEILMATION 1-1 4--11 191 4416+20 - 1 1SSLE: Rnlt;KNS ====4*R[Mt]--~3~-2 t[~] - - 6---~ } - -- - ty- - / 1---715 %~t-1- lf==Â¥Z 1.-ILL-321 VE-- 53&*:.â„¢CHEt 0 14------~ ifi.k--c# Eff-i--- - -Il 1 ~-- 5,2 1 ---- -I=== - - #1* =-- 4-1.-UL-1 - =42-1-2-EL-frES-d 4===162~ r=-te 4 - d .....9 EX-UÂ«G DO<>a AND MICM *GUIP WEE,r ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION CZEZZZIZZE 4 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS fCAU 1/' â€¢ 1 -0" 4'----- 4-Â·1!5~5~ FT-TETT-rTT-T- 1. 1 j , / - 11 1 li -4-il 111 Ill tÂ© Ill'Illi -' HAGMAN YAW - ARCHITECTS - "ll'\1\' 141Â·.' 'Wklke+I; ALLEY Â«69.4 . f. i .0 L= - 1. . Â· 'Â·Â· Â·I' ELK'S . CLUB REMODEl. MASON & MORSE BUILDING #81%R*1211/ i - Fl UNIOF')'ABOVE iÂ·{Â· ~ -~:-~ i ~ Â·: j-; ' ~ ~~ ~ 17 \ 3 . .. X C 01.ORAI)0 P. - _ - _~7 Asi'EN, GM Â·E RIX INK MN%Â· 'A~~ '9 L , tiÂ·.'.. :-t,Q-/ ' -ARIA a 1:1 1- t. 1@*10 ill L 1==pÂ· 1 -- -<, - - il, 1111111111 {/0 (r# T-1 0 --1 . 4 'Â·_X ./ . 4-- --* i 7---_ff 71 - -- HYMAN AVENUE SrrE PLAN 11 SCALE: 1/8" â€¢ 1'4 4-137~371- 3-1 - 13] 3 -1 LI.t.LIqt=z~~-W Â·- -1-4. ...3 1-1.~4-i-4 i 11 11 i 'iii J .1 11 1 1 - 'Â·nr......-Il--r- 121-=w i .. www . 11 1,111 111 11 -11nr-F~+Er 1 .Dic/Ill *Il-1, T ~ 0 "-1 1 I C 111 7 P w .i -1 z 1 -Eer imm :01,ill'11 J'C 2 , 1111 1111 F:i 1 11 ~1:~ 1 1 .11,1 1 75/fITÂ¥rf 1 6 ULL.lill-1. E.t 1 .1 1 24 - -0 ,-s-,u,micâ€¢,11] 111â€¢1 BH]I]Il[-1'17'111 I i, 1 C [= 'FE[y [Â¤17'i , 1 . i 11 err -L= /114Â¢*iM -79 j ~71[- M =--1Â·â€žrU~*141;6-L ZE}~tE : 727;il~'7~ i'L-FEIF]T i Â·~~ i ~r - 1 1 i:?4~1[*E- 9 11 1 : ' :-CliC[ A Fl~lm-r - 4,._ : 1 -4=f r.- 11 (dico'4=ct 'MIN, E - .1 :lilli %... k ' 11 . 11 1~ 1, r. ter 7 4'il| ; ill !111111~ 11 'I >2 w,Li~- 94 53 - MiE ELE . 11 lilli 11111 ~1 1 11'Fl ?lilli.lilli' 1 1 1 2 1 Td ... Â·â€¢ i 11- 1 - ~ I :11~ DI'l . *111 4 LA N,11111 "Il'1111111#1111'ip 0 ~ ' '~ ~ 11~" &4411 ~111~11'[ -~ 11 1 . , m.1;=El=ZE"16, U.-5 .LLEE- .-LLULLLUIL] 1 . l- 4-- SNOLLM\3'13 rnAE[ SY NOUVATI3 H,LHON 311111111 et] ECTS - 9. HAGMAN YAW ~ 3 1\.1, 141\ '.....'11 "- A %6/â€¢14 - \ D . l 11 1, , i ==11 . r-ri r=v==i RRMOVI: EXISTING P.WOOD KNTIRI! RUII.D[NG BXT *lf *MEN-ttlli L-NEWSTAIR~gll.TOR AND WINI)OWS - RKPLACE 9/1â„¢ TO RE CUA NE' .......Rm/AND/le/M.ATE -~ 21-12-1-. L 4- - - -7 1.Ul U .L-11- 1--1 LI -Ii- A BRICK TO RE Tl!CK.I 41=-M=J- u - c kth-j f / BRICK WI.AR IM SIZ-* ANDPOINT. D = 34~ ~_~ ~ ~~ _ =4, F COI,OR TO RXISTING IrRleK - - C= -- - 1I1 111 t.. , - E 1 1 lilli 1 .- 1.1 1 El.K'S - r - m (~1,[;H 977Â» - :===- 7i~=-= 1 13 11 F PFitÂ·-- 1111-nlf i - f Jll =---- 1 IIII -fill= - 1 - - - = 11[ --=-,-T- 1Ft-*al/701.-Un --5-, -ZE-'JE= 1Â£-F FUZ-IL.-1 -u 40Â©4 - A *0-Ll EAST ELEUTION SOUTH ELEVATION r----- 1 U -- - - ~- ASPEN. (()Ink AIx) ~-3111Â«0114 =:==~ 2- 141 Ta Ml!*)NSÂ· -- 1 -- E--2 1=f - a i t-Â·Â·44 Ch-_ c .&*1001' AND PAINT ArTACHED i ... .....]M --_1-3 4.zi=~rl .w. /1 DOOR AND ~ICH. EQUIP - ARCII]l ; I ) k'l~~~'+ TfNITORFV.Rl~GATED . - L - Ill -- .1 r -1 i REMODEL --- r 1 r--:Â· - - - 9Â«3 - l - *71 WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION PROPOSED ELEVATIONS - MCALA 1/' â€¢ 1'/ ~ 1-FT-r-1--r-r T-1- k.. .1 t 2.-1 -~-1--L-,L 1 -. -44-4- 1 2 1:.111-1 j :1:11-12 1 1 1 ri~.liMMMFTWhiWrflmmpT7NMT) - CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 9/5/89 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: | 0;/ 11 / .?M 2737-182-13-001 86A-89 STAFF MEMBER: PROJECT NAME: Elks Building GMOS Exemption Project Address: 210 S. Galena St. Legal Address: Lots K. L & M. Block 94 APPLICANT: BPO Elks No. 224 Applicant Address: 210 S. Galena St. REPRESENTATIVE: Michael Doyle, Haqman. Yaw Architects Representative Address/Phone: 210 S. Galena St. Aspen. CO 81611 5-2867 PAID: YES NQ AMOUNT: 4 t,7-'~ NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: 1> --; 2- Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: ~/~ Date: REFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ) City Electric Building Inspector Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other Aspen Consol. Energy Center S.D. In e DATE REFERRED: Colblry INITIALS: 04 FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: IIIRIg1 INITIAL: Of- City Atty City Engineer / Zoning Env. Health Housing / Other: *02 C /1 t FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: ,'CÂ»Cl /f ../CÂ»u.,PLA A. i - MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Drueding, Zoning Officer FROM: Leslie Lamont, PlannÂ£3:;~3~ RE: Elks Building GMQS Exemption DATE: October 24, 1989 SUMMARY: The applicant seeks a GMQS exemption for the enlargement of an Historic Landmark. The Elks propose to add a new approximately 864 square foot stair and elevator tower. The Club also intends to reconfigure the existing interior spaces by moving all the Elks functions to the third floor, all professional offices to the second floor, all retail to the first floor, and all storage for the club and retail uses in the basement. FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 8-104 the Planning Director may exempt an enlargement of an Historic Landmark intended to be used as a commercial or office development which increases either the building's existing floor area ratio or its net leasable square footage, but does not increase both. It is staff's determination that the rearrangement of uses within the building does not increase the net leasable square footage. The addition of the elevator and stair tower does represent an increase in floor area by 864 square feet. The elevator is necessary for club functions that are being moved to the third floor. The Elks building is already over the height limit of the CC zone. It is recommended that the elevator tower not exceed the roof line. The conceptual development review of this addition to the Elks building is being reviewed by the Historic preservation Committee at their November 8, 1989 meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends GMQS Exemption for the approximately 864 square foot elevator and stair tower, subject to HPC review, with the condition that any addition shall not exceed the roof line. I hereby approve the GMQS Exemption pursuant to Section 8-104 1(b) of the Asppn Land Use Code. (,ti-r l,39444,0-Â·~r- , Amy ~rgerum,~Planning Dlrector HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS MEMORANDUM LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee 303/925-2867 Roxanne Eflin MAY 1 61990 Don Erdman FROM: Michael Doyle /PO RE: Elks Building Remodel DATE: May 1 4, 1990 This will serve to document the decisions arrived at in our meeting at the site today. It was agreed that the method of cleaning the building would be the water and detergent method. The approved sandstone was "Mesa Red" from Utah, a sample of which I will retain at my office. The approved brick for the tower is "Delaware" by Robinson Brick. I will also keep a sample panel of this at my office. Remaining samples to be approved are the 8x8 infill brick at the tower and the color of the metal cornice. We will investigate the cornice to see if we can identify the original color. If this conflicts with your understanding please notify me as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation. CC: Gary Starr Shaw Construction Ed Irwin Elks Club MD/tss TIM HAGMAN ALA LARRY YAW AIA D(lll(, C,RAYBFAI AM MARK HENTHORN.AM IOHN COTTI E. AM '11.14.1 /4111111111111111111 MEMORANDUM To: Board of Adjustment From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Webber Block (Elks Building) 7 210 S. Galena - Height variance for elevator tower Date: ~ March 15, 1990 * On March 14, 1990, the Historic Preservation Committee granted Final Development approval for the Webber Block (Elks Building). The proposal included a west elevation storefront renovation, window replacement, masonry cleaning and repointing and the addition of an elevator/stair tower along the east elevation, near the center of the building. The historic landmark is approximately 46' in height, exceeding current height limits in the CC zone (40'). To access the third floor of the building, the tower's minimum height is 42.5 ', as presented by the applicant. All mechanicals will be incorporated within the structure; none will be higher than cornice height. The HPC and staff support the applicant's request to the Board of Adjustment for the height variance for the tower, finding its design compatible with the historic resource. All historic encroachments have been approved by Council. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Board of Adjustment CC: Michael Doyle, Hagman-Yaw Architects (applicant representative) From: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Webber Block height variance (210 S. Galena) Date: April 25, 1990 The Aspen Historic Preservation Committee reviewed and unanimously approved the rehabilitation and elevator tower addition of the historic Webber Block. The Webber Block itself exceeds existing height limits by approximately six feet. In order to access the third floor and be designed to completely contain all mechanicals, the elevator tower is 42.5', exceeding the height limit in the Commercial Core by 2.5'. The HPC supports the applicant's request for height variance, finding the design and functional aspects appropriate within the Commercial Core Historic District. memo.bofa.webber HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS MEMORANDUM LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 To: Roxanne Eflin From: Michael Doyle /f~) Date: April 19, 1990 Re: Elks Building Remodel As per our conversation this morning, it is our understanding that if the Hard Rock Cafe moves the entrance to their space to the adjacent bay on Galena Street, but makes no other changes to the exterior of the building, they will not be required to go back before HPC. Please notify us if you have any problem with this. Also, I have enclosed a sample of the cladding material for the double hung windows that was approved by Don Erdman. We will notify you when we have cleaned a portion of the building for your inspection. Thank you for your cooperation. CC: Bob Fugman , . In APR 2 4 1990 filt HAULAN AM LARIA YAW AIA DOUG GIUYBEAL ALA MARK HEATHORN AM JOHN COTTI E AIA 111~imm,Ii/111 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD â€¢ 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 APR - 4 1990 PROJECT MEMO TO: Don Erdman, HPC Representative for Elks Building Remodel FROM: Michael Doyle 412 DATE: April 2, 1990 RE: Selection of Cladding Material for Double Hung Windows This will serve to document the decision to select bronze as the cladding color for the windows. The decision was made on March 26, 1990. If you have any problem with this, please notify us immediately. 11\111\(,MA AIA 1 \R In Mt Al.\ POI C. irRA\111 Al Al \ \1\Rk HE\11101?1 \IA 1011\Lin Ill ALA r.1,1,11.111,111]11,111,Il,J - ATmCHMENT 1 LAND USE APPIJXZATION FORM 1) Pmject Naina Elks Building 2) Pmject IDcation 210 South Galena, Aspen Colorado Lots K, L, and M Block 94 (indicate street address, lot & block rumber, legal description ulere apprcpr:Late) 3) Present Zoning CC 4) Lot Size 9000 sf 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # Elks Club No. 224 210 South Galena 925-4384 6) Representative's Name, Address & phone # Ed Irwin, 210 S. Galena 925-3516 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Coniitional Use Conceptual SPA X Conceptual Historic Dev. ~~._ Special Review Final SPA - Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Comeptlal FUD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final RJD Historic Demolition Maintain View Plane Subdivisicn Historic Designaticn . Corxhniniumizaticn - Text/Map AmIâ„¢Ert (203 Allotment Lot Split/Lot Line (NES Exanption Adjustment 8) Description of Ekisting Uses (rimber arxl type of ecisting structures; approximate sq. ft.; nmber of bedroans; any previa= awrrivals granted to the property). Basement - Mech 252 sf., Elks Club 1278 sf., Rest./Stor 4797 sf. Ground Level -Elks 2183 sf., Retail 4072 sf., 2nd Fbor -Elks 2364 sf. Office 3250 sf. 3rd Floor- office 5614 sf. 9) Descripticn of Devele,=It Application Arld new stair/elevator tower west of the building in existing empty lot ; Reconfigure existing interior spaces to the following; Move all Elks functions to the third floor and 2nd floor becomes all offices. Ground floor becomes all retail. Basement becomes storage, for ground leVel retail. Clean building r eplace store tront 10) Have you attac:hed the following? to match existing store front. -- X Response to Attadment 2, Minininn Submission Contents X Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents X Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application PUBLIC NOTICE RE: CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT OF 210 SOUTH GALENA, THE WEBBER BLOCK (A/K/A THE ELKS BUILDING), ADDITION OF ELEVATOR/STAIR TOWER TO EAST WALL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, October 18, 1989, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee in the Second Floor City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado, to consider an application by the Elks Club #224, represented by Ed Irwin, for the conceptual development of the property at 210 South Galena Street, Lots K, L, and M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The proposal consists of the addition of a three (3) story elevator/stair tower located at the east wall of the building and storefront renovation along Galena Street. For further information contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611. (303) 920-5090. s/William J. Poss Chairman, Aspen Historic Preservation Committee Published in the Aspen Times on October 5, 1989 City of Aspen Account pub.notice.210SG HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS MEMORANDUM LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 TO: Planning Director, City of Aspen FROM: Michael Doyle RE: Replies to Attachments 2 and 3a, Significant Historic Development Application DATE: August 9, 1989 As noted on the coversheet, the Elks Club wishes to renovate and refurbish parts of its building at 210 S. Galena. The two proposed changes which have significant impact on the original historic structure are one, the new elevator/stair tower and two, renovation of storefront where the Elks Club currently resides. 1. New Elevator/Stair Tower. Since the Elks Club is proposing moving to the 3rd. floor and many of its members are elderly, a new elevator/stair tower is required. In concept, we would propose a similar solution to that employed at the Wheeler Opera House. That is a tower, slightly detached visually, using similar sized and colored bricks as the original structure. The fenestration is of similar sizes and aligns to the openings on the historic structure. The tower would be set back from Hyman St. to align with the adjacent Mason and Morse Building. 2. Renovation of storefront along Galena Street. Since this portion of the building will be returned to retail, we propose removing the existing painted plywood and returning to a storefront similar to that of the rest of the buildings ground level. In addition to these two major items, the entire building will be cleaned and checked for crumbling mortar, etc. The attached block structure in the alley will be cleaned up as well as the loose wires, etc. in the back. We feel these proposed changes maintain the integrity of the historic structure and will benefit not only the building, but also the surrounding neighborhood. Aspen Elks Lodgi 224 210 S. Galena St., #21 Aspen, CO 81611 Lodge 920-4384 Office 925-3516 4 ,â€¢F To whom it may concern: â„¢U.J The Aspen Elks Lodge is a Colorado non-profit corporation located at the above address and with the above telephone number. Sincerely, GQ e.Â»40 Ed Irwin Trustee Chairman PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc. . ,/ Title Insurance Company Vincent J. Higens 601 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Christina M. Davis President (303) 925-1766 Â· (303) 925-6527 FAX Vice President MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP-ACCOMMODATION NO LIABILITY FOR THE SOLE USE OF: PLEASE DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. CHARLES A. 00RN 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1766 FAX (303) 925-6527 DESCRIPTION: LOTS K, L. AND M, BLOCK 94, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO GRANTEE IN THE LAST INSTRUMENT APPARENTLY TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRUST DEEDS AND MORTGAGES APPARENTLY UNRELEASED: INUAL LIENS AND JUDGEMENTS (AGAINST LAST GRANTEE) APPARENTLY UNRELEASED: NONE THIS INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR SOLE USE AND BENEFIT AND IS FURNISHED AS AN ACCOMMODATION. THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM OUR TRACT INDICES, WITHOUT REFERENCE, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO, OR EXAMINATION OF, INSTRUMENTS WHICH PURPORTS TO AFFECT THE REAL PROPERTY. THE INFORMATION IS NEITHER GUARANTEED NOR CERTIFIED, AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE , OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND OUR LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT OF THE FEES. DATE: AUGUST '14 1989 AT 8:00 A.M. \7 by: â‚¬ .-- . I PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc. Title Insurance Company Vincent J. Higens 601 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Christina M. Davis President (303) 925-1766 Â· (303) 925-6527 FAX Vice President MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP-ACCOMMODATION NO LIABILITY FOR THE SOLE USE OF: PLEASE DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. CHARLES A. DORN 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1766 FAX (303) 925-6527 DESCRIPTION: LOTS K, L, AND M, BLOCK 94, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO GRANTEE IN THE LAST INSTRUMENT APPARENTLY TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRUST DEEDS AND MOkTGAGES APPARENTLY UNRELEASED: NONE LIENS AND JUDGEMENTS (AGAINST LAST GRANTEE) APPARENTLY UNRELEASED: NONE THIS INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR SOLE USE AND BENEFIT AND IS FURNISHED AS AN ACCOMMODATION. THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM OUR TRACT INDICES, WITHOUT REFERENCE, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO, OR EXAMINATION OF, INSTRUMENTS WHICH PURPORTS TO AFFECT THE REAL PROPERTY. THE INFORMATION IS NEITHER GUARANTEED NOR CERTIFIED, AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE , OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND OUR LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT OF THE FEES. DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 AT 8:00 A.M. PIT 'r-C 0,1.~ 1-Ti*E, NNC. by: .- \ b- , PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc. Title Insurance Company Vincent J. Higens 601 E. Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Christina M. Davis President (303) 925-1766 Â· (303) 925-6527 FAX Vice President MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP-ACCOMMODATION NO LIABILITY FOR THE SOLE USE OF: PLEASE DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. CHARLES A. DORN 601 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1766 FAX (303) 925-6527 DESCRIPTION: LOTS K. L, AND M, BLOCK 94, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO GRANTEE IN THE LAST INSTRUMENT APPARENTLY TRANSFERRING OWNERSHIP: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRUST DEEDS AND MORTGAGES APPARENTLY UNRELEASED: NONE LIENS AND JUDGEMENTS (AGAINST LAST GRANTEE) APPARENTLY UNRELEASED: NONE THIS INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR SOLE USE AND BENEFIT AND IS FURNISHED AS AN ACCOMMODATION. THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM OUR TRACT INDICES, WITHOUT REFERENCE, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO, OR EXAMINATION OF, INSTRUMENTS WHICH PURPORTS TO AFFECT THE REAL PROPERTY. THE INFORMATION IS NEITHER GUARANTEED NOR CERTIFIED, AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE , OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND OUR LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT OF THE FEES. DATE: AUGUST 4 1989 AT 8:00 A.M. PITKIN'*6 6~1 T Y t hOE, INC . by: ~_~s~~ 9- I ' 1 ' u~656.4' ew* 6...1 f?:76 it Â¥*aÂ¥.. A.. ..42. 9 4,1 r?.244 DEED *:' ,/0,7 :74-6 )Â· ~14 â€¢97 4....4,617â‚¬4 THIS DFU) is made and executed this / 322 day 0Â£ 4. flu, Â»r 1,Â·4. j~:-64 1988 from JESSE MADDALON;r. Grantor, to ASPEN LODGE NO. 224, *t72 ; Mili . p .Col cÂ·,2 BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF FLKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF . Ork >-r. - ~'.Z AMERICA, Grantee. I /711-04 :83'Tr41 2 :,M 7 41 .%70,4 42&2-, AÂ©gfft, %4 2. RECITALS . ..1 , 442.43; 1 I . ....4. I .... '141*11 '44â€¢i 16 . .1.604 A. On or about February 20. 1959 ASPEN LODGE NO. 224, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF 1 In*04 /'464,9 AMERICA was incorporated under the laws of the State of . lifoâ€¢ 29, %*1,9, 1, 5 Colorado. That corporation was suspended on October 22,1979 and t Â·e.,44,7 r was dissolved according to the laws of the State of Colorado, i 9- Â·' . effective January 1, 1983. I 0 *Efi , B. At the time said corporation was dissolved, its sole :4-4,44 48, 11 .,â‚¬ft,;ri 0% 1 and last. acting director as named in the files of the Colorado 14't , Secretary of State pertaining to said corporation was Jesse 161Â¥Ii- Â¥ I 4' Maddalone, Grantor herein. Â»: -elly'fii<L ' I'- 12 s C. A new corporation with the same name has been ,-- ,Â· Â·Â· MY'11/ . itÂ¥ , - 90uyÂ· {Er created under the laws of the State of Colorado, incorporation I MA 03. 1 - rk 1 4 having been made effective June 14. 1988 by the filing of Articles of Incorporation with the Colorado Secretary of State. 2â‚¬C ./ 1, EL':R D. Grantor, as the sole surviving and last acting 47 / 0.'. 7-#'r director of the dissolved corporation, wishes to ve,t title to , 4" .1 9 .Iri :44. certain real eâ€¢tate formerly owned by the dissolved corporation 1, 6. i . ; ./ r. in the newly formed corporation. , 1 .i 9 NOW THEREFORE, Grantor, who teside, at 2265 Tanglewood 1, 9. 1 11 1.,C I. I. . Road. Grand Junction, Colorado 81503, in his capacity aâ€¢ the .tt ,. 4, 4 , 11:'.4,-W. .. 4 â€¢ole surviving and lait acting director of the â€¢ail diâ€¢â€¢olved 1 +PU~ 17. 11- 6., corporation. by virtu- of thâ€¢ powâ€¢r vâ€¢,ted In him by .101 i il C.R.S. 0 7-26-120(2), hereby selle and convâ€¢yn to ASPFN LODGE NO. ..4.( . 224, BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVâ€¢ ORDER OF ELKR OF THE UNITED STATE 'r. 4 1 -. Â·,;Â·L L . W $4 Â· .4 I J V..1 15 N * 0 EN 0 TA 4 k 1- 10 -1=1 7 CJ .1 . ...t *Ill . ./ . 9,/r i f :. .9 . <44- ;34' 1 -- Ul m 72. 1 42 Â» tf4 1.4 - J $ 0. . . Â·6772 ~1,4~ 're , 15 4Â· 40 4 r.-9.â€¢ 9 Â· . U i /5 a=Elt= '3 2 .. 5.4.*014-,9 ...4 1.W,-* Â·Â·Â·â€¢ *4%#14 ./ ' 2% ' OF AMERICA, a Colorado non-profit corporation incorporated June 40*Â¥9 3,1 4,Â·11.44 T * 2 41 t..1 Z 14, 19B8. the addres, if which 1, 210 eouth Galena Street, Aipen, pt,Â¥:-r i.twi Colorado 81611, Grantee, the following real property located in 1 9/491491 the County of Pitkin and 9tate of Colorado, to witt , 4â€¢ Wil.,f. . ,..mi.20 LOTS R, L AND M. BLOCK 94. :. CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN 3. 4,87. with all its appur tenances. , *fiCINT. . Â· A' .13 i'S TO HA&% AND TO HOLD unto the said Grantee and ita â€¢uc- 1 . '. 11~ ceâ€¢sorâ€¢ and alsigns forever. 2 , f'.1, , 0 b *Ir?ir 4 8 -'7â„¢ 1 . I I Â»au ..... - 4 Jesse Maridalone /Role surviving and laft acting , 4 f. it !.01 4 di/ettor of Aspen Lodge No. 224. , Penevolent and Protective Order of '~ J.-f' â€¢lk, of thâ€¢ United Rtates of . 26%Â¢.fl America. a di,iolved corporation. .74 '.4. 1- i j./147 1 44,2Â»i, STATE OF COLORADO ) A.54 6* I / rver.Lf l.,1 7 1 Ms. COUNTY OF /,4 2.2. ) '4 .t,/A 3 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thi, 4 &. 0...Ir, Lgf day ot 6*11 #4, 1988, by Jesse Maddalone as sole surviving i and.laâ€¢t acting director of Aqpen Lodge No. 224. Benevolent and - v - Â·411Â·..trk 5 Protective Order of Elks of the United qtate, of America, a ,Â¢.*:... diâ€¢â€¢olved corporation. .1, Â· 14.5 1,1044 Witne93 my hand and official Beal. ./.&Â·Il ..'t"Iâ€¢.~ A ' p-#,43=,, ~ My commis,ion expireâ€¢: ,'Â£/1 1 K . : E-440 t'.744 4 4.93 44: '41 . 7 J}34Â£*.Â«46Â¥ff. , 7,41*?012 t ' Notary Public Â·, f!-9-r:1'CIA A.i 'M / '.. b * 0 11& 14-' 2 i i,ilit.Wi ) u .:,i ':44 4 4% Ie- : y. *441' tf ON' i.%... /4 9 . cÂ·titti~~ 1 * r,w,: .rn:lf. t WHE?ke:W ./t â‚¬ '- Â·/,'Â·.Â«lif' Â· 4 ..4,414 i i ' ~i./1 FIX:Ae 'g,Â¥tryÂ·# *Â·: ir*Â·.44/4,1'*<91 W.'A,*~#**r 1 , r. ,Â»Â·Â·Â· . .1,12 4 /1 caL.Li'l'~ali./.4,(.1/li4iLA:dN=Â£&*~L,~ r/4,â€ž6 ,4.,0.'.- .~1.-1,al .1 1, . 11 . . 19)yer@tie Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective date: 05/16/89 AT 8:00 A.M. Case No. PCT-3444 2. Policy or policies to be issued: (a)ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 8-1970 Amount S PRO FORMA (Rev. 10-17-70 & 10-17-841 or 10/21/87 Premium S - PROPOSED INSURED: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224. BENEVOLENT and PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (b)ALTA Loan Policy, Amount S (REV. 10-21-87) Premium $ PROPOSED INSURED: (c)Alta Loan Construction Policy. 1975 Amount S (Rev. 10-17-84) Premium S PROPOSED INSURED: Tax Cert. S 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: ASPEN LODGE NO. 224. BENEVOLENT and PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS OF THE UNITED Â§TATES OF AMERICA 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOTS K, L AND M, BLOCK 94. CITY AND TOWNSITED OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO Countersigned at: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN. CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 303-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules A and B are attached. agent Â·m 100 Litho in U.S.A. 5-0-100-0041/2 _i-'Â«L-.''Iiâ€¢Â·~~0L.d#' -â€¢4Â§' dA~' -A' -Â·W -,1., ..... . '17,1 Impyersllue Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s). creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: PRO FORMA This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 1 PG.1 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-3444 A and B are attached. rm 100 Litho in U.S.A. 5-0-100-0041/2 m~Mm~m~7~mTrmETiIEEE[iJEiIEE3IiaiIEIEIEZ~EZiEZiIjEELEE1Â£2222!U~ A Â·" Aâ€¢(it....~IL.IL*/1/./." A .11' I.:44.i .11, I Â·i' â€¢â€¢./ Â·Â·' /- . TT.7 1 Ituyers litte Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE 3-SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements. or claims of easements. not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines. shortage in area. encroachments. and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien. or right to a lien. for services. labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. . 5. Defects. liens. encumbrances. adverse claims or other matters. if any. created. first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitmenr. 6. Taxes due and payable: and any tax, special assessment. charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. i. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded October 26. 1887 in Book 59 at Page 64 and recorded March 29. 1889 in Book 59 at Page 549 as follows: That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold. silver. cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws. 8. Mineral reservations as contained in Deeds recorded June 10. 1891 in Book 98 at Page 496, in Book 105 at Page 129 and in Book 106 at Page 482 as follows: The full free and perpetual right to dig, work. search for. mine and remove all ores and mineral bearing rock and earth underneath the land. 9. Terms. conditions. obligations and provisions of Notice of Historic Designation as set forth in instrument recorded January 13. 1975 in Book 295 at Page 515. 10. Terms. conditions. obligations and provisions of Leases as set forth in instruments recorded November 17. 1985 in Book 499 at Page 976: July 23, 1986 in Book 515, at Page 21. Continued m 100 Litho tri U.S.A. -0-100-0041/2 1-[IC MIC 1.11(: 1.11(: t.[Il 1.!IC 1.[IC 1.11(' MIC. 1.FIC IJIC LTIC . Impyers title Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 11. Terms. conditions. obligations and provisions of Encroachment Agreement. as set forth in instrument recorded July 11. 1986 in Book 514 at Page 353. :his commitment is invalid unless Schedule 3-Section 2 PG.2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT-3444 A and B are attached. m 100 Litho in U.S.A. -0-100-0041/2 Impyers title Insurance @poration NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND, VIRGINIA SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 CONTINUED Exceptions numbered NONE are hereby omitted. The Owner's/Mortgage Policy to be issued. if any. shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing issuance thereof: water rights. claims or title to water. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No.PCT-3444 A and B are attached. 1-I(Lli<ilill.liCLTI..!11..liC.I.iltillil.Ticill<1.TlCkrIC:.Tlitilfi.liCi Form 100 Litho in U.S.A . .~Il-Ii.--lill- 1%1)~I@tie Insumnce @porntlon NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS RICHMOND. VIRGINIA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and chargestherefor; all subject totheprovisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured andtheamountof the policyor policiescommitted for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof bythe Company, eitheratthe timeof theissuanceof this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever f irstoccurs, providedthat the failure to issue such policyorpoliciesisnot the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall notbe validorbindinguntilcountersigned by an authorized officeror agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2 If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect. lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, andshall failtodisclosesuchknowledge totheCompanyin writing, the Companyshallberelieved from liability for any loss ordamage resulting fromanyact of reliance hereontotheextenttheCompanyisprejudiced by failureto sodisclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge tothe Company, orif the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance. adverse claim or other matter, the Companyat itsoption mayamend Schedule Bof thisCommitmentaccordingly, butsuchamendmentshall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith(a)tocomply withtherequirements hereof, or(b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or(c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. Imuyers 11lle Insur@re Grporation .ElÂ»-2. su 044)716~'~ President 1. \ Attest: 141.\1 j 1.:\ i.,S r 4,1 oecretary , V - 4 - * I. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Conceptual Development: 210 S. Galena St., The Webber Block (Elks Building) - Public Hearing Date: November 8, 1989 LOCATION: 210 S. Galena St., Lots K, L, and M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen ZONING: CC - Commercial Core, "H" Historic Overlay District Designated Landmark APPLICANT: The Elks Club #224, represented by Ed Irwin HPC MONITOR: To be assigned at this meeting APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Conceptual Development approval for a new elevator/stair tower at the east elevation, and the renovation of the Galena Street storefront (excluding the previously renovated Esprit space). A "vest pocket park" greenspace will be created at the east elevation between the Hyman Street sidewalk and the elevator tower. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The Development review standards are found in Section 7-601 of the Land Use Code, and are reviewed below. The applicable Guidelines are found in Section IV. Commercial Buildings - Renovation and Restoration, beginning on Page 19 of the Aspen Historic District and Historic Landmark Development Guidelines. The technical brief: Exterior Stair Tower Additions, as an interpretation of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, is included as information in the packet. This is a potential ITC (Investment Tax Credit) project, therefore, careful review is required in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation (please refer to your blue manual). We commend the applicant on the future renovation, restoration and preservation of this National Register eligible landmark. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overlay district or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark... Â· m Response: (TOWER) The Elk's need for an exterior elevator/stairway tower are due to the relocation of the club from the first to the third floor, to allow for retail/commercial utilization of the first floor. The project is very similar to the Wheeler Opera House's tower, whose design was utilized as the basis for this one. In reviewing the technical brief attached, we find that the proposal generally meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, and Standard #1 stated above (with the exceptions as noted below). Our concerns focus on the width and proposed height (43'), which is 3' above maximum allowable, and approximately 5' below the existing height of the building. The applicant has stated the proposed height is as low as they are able to design to access the third floor and provide the mechanicals, and states they have kept the interior width at a minimum. The HPC may consider ways to reconfigure the interior stair and elevator to reduce the width. Also, provided the HPC is not able to work with the applicant to determine ways to further reduce the height, the Planning Office recommends that the HPC recommend the Board Of Adjustment approve a variance request from the applicant. The tower sits 25' to the north of the Hyman St. sidewalk. The plans include a "vest pocket park"/landscaped area. This may be changed slightly to accommodate the existing 1st floor opening (3' or so to the south). We recommend that the Final Development approval include a landscape plan for the greenspace, and indicate parking and trash areas. The front entrance to the tower is canopied with a suspended, arched glass covering, similar to the covering over the "Shooters" stairs on Galena. One alternative to this may be to incorporate a coordinated awning design for portions of the storefront level. Signage should also be addressed. We recommend that the Final Development approval include a detail of the tower entrance and landscaping. The materials indicated appear compatible to the existing landmark. The rusticated sandstone banding aligns horizontally with the banding on the landmark. We recommend compatible brick though not exactly matching. The required vertical break between structures is treated as stacked windows on the south elevation. The north elevation indicates a very narrow transition between old and new, which appears to meet the Guidelines, however, the transition element should be restudied to provided a slightly more pronounced break. (STOREFRONT): Galena Street storefronts are among Aspen's most pronounced character defining feature. Their 2 preservation (and restoration) set standards throughout the community, certainly in the Commercial Core Historic District. The careful review and approval of this portion of the proposal is critical to not only the historic integrity of the Webber Block, but it may determine whether tax credits may be taken or not. The proposal does not disclose enough information on the existing Galena Street storefront elevation in order for staff to recommend approval. The existing conditions drawing (west elevation) does not include the original sandstone base elements. Original windows and other materials, especially those hidden beneath plywood, have not been thoroughly examined for preservation purposes. Preservation of original materials is required over replacement. Staff recommends that a proiect monitor be assigned to review the storefront preservation issues with the applicant. architect and staff. It might also be noted that the "new" Esprit storefront is beginning to show signs of chipping paint and rust. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: We find that the proposal generally meets this guideline, and refers exceptions to this in the response comments above. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structure located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The cultural value of this exceptional Aspen Landmark will be enhanced with the implementation of an on- going maintenance plan for this building. We find that a restoration of the Galena Street (west elevation) storefront will greatly enhance the building's cultural value to the community through the removal of inappropriate materials. Due to the placement on the east elevation, we find that the elevator/stairway tower does not detract from the cultural value of the Webber Block. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: Tower: We recommend the HPC study the transition/break between old and new very carefully, utilizing the 3 Guidelines and information provided by the National Park Service; we find that the proposal generally meets this standard. Storefront: We find that the proposal for the storefront does not meet this standard, as discussed fully in staff's response to Standard #1 above. The removal of original features does the diminish the architectural integrity of the landmark. Handicapped ramping should also be addressed in the proposal. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider the following alternatives: 1. Approve the Conceptual Development application as submitted 2. Approve the proposal with the conditions (staff's recommendations for conditions are stated below) 3. Table action to allow the applicant further time to study the proposal, incorporating the comments and guidance from the HPC in a revised proposal. 4. Deny Final Development approval finding that the application does not meet the development review standards. A denial would constitute a re-notice of the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Conceptual Development approval for the elevator/stair tower, with conditions, and that the HPC table Conceptual Development approval for the storefront proposal to allow the applicant time to further study the proposal. We find that the storefront proposal does not meet Standards #1 and #4. Conditions of Conceptual Development approval, to be submitted for Final Development Review: 1. Restudy width and height Of tower element (for reduction purposes) 2. Partial demolition (east elevation) shall be detailed 2. Restudy tower design transition/break between old and new. 3. All mechanical equipment will not exceed respective roof height. 4. All mechanical equipment shall be clarified, i.e. relocated ground floor equipment, east elevation 4 . 5. Tower entrance detailed drawing, including canopy, windows, door, signage. 6. Exact material representation, including sample of brick and sandstone 7. Maintenance plans for entire building, addressing external surface cleaning, brick repointing, storefront system repainting, etc. memo.hpc.210sg.cd 5 3 1 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS MEMORANDUM LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 TO: Planning Director, City of Aspen FROM: Michael Doyle RE: Replies to Attachments 2 and 3a, Significant Historic Development Application DATE: October 31, 1989 As noted on the coversheet, the Elks Club wishes to renovate and refurbish parts of its building at 210 S. Galena. The two proposed changes which have significant impact on the original historic structure are one, the new elevator/stair tower and two, renovation of storefront where the Elks Club currently resides. 1. New Elevator/Stair Tower. Since the Elks Club is proposing moving to the 3rd floor and many of its members are elderly, a new elevator/stair tower is required. In concept, we would propose a similar solution to that employed at the Wheeler Opera House. That is a tower using similar sized and colored bricks as the original structure. The fenestration is of similar sizes and aligns to the openings on the historic structure. The tower would be set back 25 ft. from Hyman St. to create a vest pocket park. 2. Renovation of storefront along Galena Street. Since this portion of the building will be returned to retail, we propose removing the existing painted plywood and returning to a storefront similar to that of the rest of the building's ground level. In addition to these two major items, the entire building will be cleaned and checked for crumbling mortar, etc. The attached block structure in the alley will be cleaned up as well as the loose wires, etc. in the back. We feel these proposed changes maintain the integrity of the historic structure and will benefit not only the building, but also the surrounding neighborhood. I[\Ilt\(AIAN At:A 1 ARRY YA\\' AIA DOUG ARAYB[.A! 41.4 WARk HENTHORX AJA IOHN COTTI E AIA - 21'll 1.1--i L 34-11 - - 7 HAGMAN YAW E ARCHITECTS - .TD 4 21O5OLTHCALE. - I 'PE, COtOR,[Â»81bil 103 925 2867 ALLEY %*r ~"~< ~ 3 Â»Jr, Â·1 " *I 490 e. 1 4 21 20 . - NEW STAIR/ELEV. TOWER LILES BUU.DING N MASON & MORSE BUTLDING -- 1 nt= 0 1 1- i i i 1/- - 9% -9 11 11 1 GSUE: LI~-1 1-CANOPY ABOVE IREVISIONS: 1Â»IDSCAPED AREA 8 \11 /0/ 1 1 0 1#4 33Â« W 1,.1 JT L.I.il 1/ /- '-7\1 i ---11 1 - HYMAN AVENUE SrrE PLAN ------- --- - SCALE. 1/8" â€¢ 1'Â« Iii-1 lilli: HAGMAN YAW ARCHrrECITS A' .!MOLTIGALE. e / \\\ L upt, CLXORAWN )03925 2861 EL----- - .... 0 r- - -NIA'111=gl EfiEEJE;=al= af-mi-Ld'-0-=-=-=1 1= 01.11 M MI3 IIi .1 .11 FGhmr==*r*==1-e=-in-- li-~jm iiCI-UIN--Â¤,I-1Ur--UEr-H=Â«rÂ»H--TEr-ill==1 Â£31==10-IC--10!~talL=:C=t~KLâ€¢tOL-41....~-+--rnÂ·~-23=~-LI==u g )=LN11-NE[R&~ 1~1 .. j' - 1 1 FT . ' - . 1 EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION - Fl--1 2 11 11 R[-1181 i-[rmTmTMR---Bal - r--77==24**2Â«] 29 41Â«2951] ' REVISIOM r 72-1~~~~~1142@ [Al B--fF - 2-21 #61' Â£1: 14-li = 6 Er=--E-11/57- 1 1 - --- ~ 1 im 1_ r-=7- 1 1 ---- U==//E455*JIFEE,/.E-I-/all \-zE=....- Ur--- - -a WES!' ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION lilli -FTP-5 4:.,LIC) AS BUIIT ELEVATIONS , 1-M-U III 1-UL-tl . -- -.&.*. Imwi 7 - HAGMAN W,W - - ARCHITECTS - :109;THGALEM UPE. COLORAD(181blt A .915 2867 _i:L-f' Il!141~1 16 - I ',2Â¤=er-*-==t--92=ttr-%>*ki~~~~-*7-*=='*="29=-mrw7--dW . T~T-=.j-~ al,MOVE EXmr,NO PU~OD UkU--al~=r=Br-$-1if44*lu u =i -L-='..42;*+N.-U#M -- ENTIRE BUILDING EXT 1 - ~- _ - ANO WINDOWS - REPL~CE wrâ„¢ 12LZEYON'RUI]killl[~ 2=7/CK.D __ _ Ni,w STOR:FRONT AND KICIPLATE*-6 +4 i 1 1 1 - COU)R /0 EXI'. BU](1 ~ - ..1 ~MUAR 04 ./ I I ti:=_11-1,-ii i.- 112 jill jui-ifirLU-till -trÂ·HZ)=-CL -trl---<*IR=FtÂ· flqr-nill] - Â»32 4*1 17-71 *M - -: -Â· 8 .' lial UR Fts ff=r litt--- HuMt==~tr=-i-tr'Hi,4------=r HTE:[8 .:1-11 1-1 -1 =.-SE.=~ r /'IN.U....q C.NOF' - 1 ~lP~mM==-1-/2=1.-==44-7=melzIL-3131 $ 1-=- 11 EL dEL=~* b 1 - 11 4/ 11/2121-1lili I , T 1 FLL___~ ..EASTELEVATION -SOUTH-ELEMATION , NEW IAm/ELEI. TOWER grAIR/ELEV. TOWER BEMOND 9 7 71--- L 6 -035-9 6 - - --- ==37-1 ti - --11 1 - r - - 5 - "--% 7 .Â£-' ./.-- I , p c._ ._.FE=-===-12~47-rt cri -ri -r-[Er-ltra -- 1 RE'Â·1SKÂ»45 1 r - - -_* 3-723*251 --1 0 1-1 H Â»1 M Lrir -4 - REROOF AND PAINT /1'TACHED _ BLOCK STRUCTRUE t -- -2.-- - -P- l...I-'......<%V*~ -3(KErr ELEVATION _ - -NORTH ELEVATION - PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ~ SCAU 1/. â€¢ 1 --'. PT7--1--1--1--1--1-1-- Ija Tedhnieal Preservation Services Preservation Assistance Division Interpreting 1 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior the Secretary of the Interior's Washington, D.C. c Standards for Rehabilitation Number: 82-037 Applicable Standards: 9. Compatible Contemporary Design for New Alterations/Additions (nonconformance) 10. Reversibility of New Alterations/Additions (nonconformance) Subject: EXTERIOR STAIR TOWER ADDITIONS Issue: Creating two separate means of egress from the upper floors of commercial buildings is a fire code requirement that generally must be dealt with in rehabilitating older buildings. Only in a very limited number of cases are variances given for this important life safety feature. In a historic rehabilitation project, this code requirement often makes it necessary to construct a second stair, either within the building or as an exterior addition. When such a new interior or exterior fire stair addition is required to meet code requirements, its construction and detailing must be in conformance with Standards 9 < and 10. These Standards address the important issues of retaining historically significant building material during rehabilitation and designing contemporary new additions that are compatible in scale, color, and material with the historic character 7 of the building. Finally, the new additions should be attached in such a way that future removal will not impair the essential integrity and form of the historic structure. If it is determined that locating the new fire stair within the building would result in the destruction of significant interior fabric, the required stair should be redesigned as an exterior addition, preferably on a secondary facade. NPS certification that an exterior fire stair is necessary to avoid loss of significant interior fabric means that the owner's construction costs are eligible for tax benefits under IRS regulations 26 CFR Parts 1 & 7. If, on the other hand, the owner chooses to construct an exterior fire stair rather than an interior fire stair solely to avoid losing valuable interior rental spaces the cost of the new construction may not be included in the overall rehabilitation expenses. Application: A 1909 two-story stone building, formerly a town hall and individually listed in the National Register, was being rehabilitated for use as professional offices (see illus. 1). The interior had been altered several times and there was little remaining original fabric. The exterior, however, was almost in its original configuration and the owner was taking great care to clean the stone and replicate any deteriorated features. . 82-037 addition resulted in loss of less historic fabric; and the addition was clearly contemporary in design, and of a scale, color, and material appropriate to the historic structure. Accordingly, the overall project was determined to meet the Secretary's Standards. Prepared by: Sharon C. Park, AIA, TPS These bulletins are issued to explain preservation project decisions made by the U.S. Department of the Interior. The resulting determinations, based on the Secretary of the.Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, are not necessarily applicable beyond the unique facts and circumstances of each particular case. l 1. ) 82-037 - - reeff'ELL29â‚¬92- - IYEAÂ¥= nct-/AU,- 7â‚¬Ae -21 ~ 1 lili 1 â‚¬130Â¢Auf - AL \ ad 21 , M [-f 6-4 08 y Â¥Â¥hyl- Eulâ„¢XLE 5. Existing plan of the building. 6. Plan of the building with proposed stair tower shaded in. MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee From: Roxanne Eflin, Planning Office Re: Final Development: 210 S. Galena St., The Webber Block (Elks Building) - Public Hearing Date: March 14, 1990 LOCATION: 210 S. Galena St., Lots K, L, and M, Block 94, City and Townsite of Aspen ZONING: CC - Commercial Core, "H" Historic Overlay District Designated Landmark APPLICANT: The Elks Club #224, represented by Ed Irwin HPC MONITOR: Don Erdman APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Final Development approval for a new elevator/stair tower at the east elevation, and the renovation of the Galena Street storefront (excluding the previously renovated Esprit space). A "vest pocket park" greenspace will be created at the east elevation between the Hyman Street sidewalk and the elevator tower. PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTION: On November 8, 1989, the HPC granted Conceptual Development approval for the proposal, subject to the following conditions to be met at Final: 1. Partial Demolition (east elevation) shall be detailed 2. Restudy the tower design transition between old and new 3. Mechanicals shall not exceed (respective) roof height 4. Mechanicals shall be clarified, i.e. east el relocated equipment 5. Tower entrance detailed (canopy, windows, door, etc.) 6. Exact material representation 7. Maintenance plans for entire building submitted 8. Consider fenestration design on north el stair tower at landings 9. Applicant shall work with staff and HPC monitor to investigate storefront and at-grade window restoration of Galena Street elevation Don Erdman, Project Monitor, and staff met on-site with the architect to discuss Condition #9; the Final Development application addresses those findings. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Please refer to the applicant's letter attached. We find that conditions of Conceptual have generally - been met, however, the Planning Office feels that the following issues must be reviewed and approved at this meeting: a. Tower entrance: The applicants have proposed a rigid glass awning at the tower entrance, which was approved in concept. However, the HPC Guidelines state (page 25): "Awnings or canopies made of aluminum, fiberglass or other rigid materials are not encouraged." Staff finds that the proposal may not meet the intent of the Guidelines, and recommends that the HPC reconsider the use of a rigid awning. A canvas or acrylic awning more closely meets the Guidelines. This material could be light and translucent, and still meet the goals to provide protection from the elements at the entrance door, and focus attention to the entrance. b. The HPC asked the applicant to restudy the transition between the historic building and the tower. The applicant has added details which should be carefully considered, as well as the south elevation window design on the tower. We are recommending that the details and first floor windows on the south elevation of the tower be restudied for compatibility. These three vertical windows above the entrance are a different design than the 2nd and 3rd floors. A more compatible solution may be more appropriate. All proposed signs should be discussed with Zoning Officer, Bill Drueding, for code compliance. C. Maintenance of building: A letter from Shaw Construction has been included with the Final Development application, stating the masonry cleaning methods proposed. Shaw also states that bricks that have deteriorated past the point of preservation shall be replaced. This letter does not sufficiently detail this critical maintenance and brick replacement issue. Staff is requiring that the Department of the Interior guidelines be strictly adhered to in both cleaning and repointing. These Technical Briefs are attached, and clearly explain the approved methodology. The lowest possible p.s.i. (400-800 max.) shall be used in water cleaning the masonry, onlv after a test section or two has been completed and reviewed bv the monitor. Repointing of the mortar joints shall match in color 2 and consistency exactly, however, the "addition of 5 percent white portland cement for not more than 20 percent of the lime Will improve workability or plasticity without adversely affecting the desirable qualities of the lime mortar." No discussion was given by the applicant regarding the maintenance of the south elevation storefront. The new Esprit storefront is in need of painting and maintenance, which we are recommending be done this year. Bare metal is showing through. d. Staff requests that the HPC carefully review the proposed storefront changes for the west elevation. We find that while the beadboard kickplate is not original, this theme has been established by the Esprit storefront renovation a few years ago. We have no significant concerns about this storefront renovation/remodel, and feel that the removal of the existing plywood panels on the west elevation will greatly enhance the cultural and architectural value of the Webber Block. Additional Staff Comments: The applicant did not present the complete window replacement of the upper stories at Conceptual, which they have done now at Final. We find that the removal and replacement of the non-original three-part windows with traditional double hung wood windows is highly desirable. All historic windows shall remain. The improvement to the building is exceptional. However, the wooden replacement windows are proposed to be clad, which the HPC should consider carefully. Please refer to staff's recommended condition below. The applicant is also proposing that the cinder block addition to the north side of the building (encroaching into the alley) be reroofed and painted. Roofing materials have not been clarified on the plans, but shall be at this meeting. The CCLC and the Engineering Department are recommending this encroachment be removed from the alley. Approximately 1/2 of this cinder block addition covers the historic stairs that lead to the basement. Staff does not support the removal of century old elements that encroach. One alternative may be to eliminate as much of the addition as possible (which provides some liquor storage and covering for the new electrical service), and retain that portion that covers the stairs. The issue of an encroachment license is coming before Council March 12. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider the following alternatives: 1. Approve the Final Development application as submitted 2. Approve the Final Development application as submitted, 3 subject the conditions (as stated below in staff's Recommendation) to be approved by staff and the Project Monitor. 3. Table action to allow the applicant further time to study the proposal, incorporating the comments and guidance from the HPC in a revised proposal. 4. Deny Final Development approval finding that the application does not meet the conditions of Conceptual Development approval. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the HPC grant Final Development approval for the proposal at 210 S. Galena St., subject to the following conditions which shall be met by the applicant, and shall be approved by staff and the Project Monitor, unless otherwise stated: 1. The replacement windows shall be reviewed and approved prior to a building permit being issued. An actual sample window or manufacturer's spec sheet shall be approved by the HPC. These windows shall replicate the original, historic windows of the Webber Block. 2. The rigid glass awning at the tower entrance shall be restudied for compliance with the Guidelines. 3. The specifications of the Department of the Interior (attached) for exterior masonry cleaning and repointing shall be strictly adhered to. The lowest possible p.s.i. (400-800 max.) shall be used in water cleaning the masonry, only after a test section or two has been completed and reviewed by the monitor. 4. Repointing of the mortar joints shall match in color and consistency exactly, however, the addition of 5 percent white portland cement for not more than 20 percent of the lime shall be used. 5. Information on the number and location of deteriorated bricks requiring replacement shall be submitted for staff and project monitor approval. 6. The HPC shall address the issue of the cinder block addition encroachment into the alley at this meeting. memo.hpc.210sg.fd.2 4 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS January 25, 1990 LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Roxanne Ellin Planning Office Hand Delivered Aspen, Colorado JAN25 RE: Elks Building Storefront Dear Roxanne: Per our conversation yesterday I would like to update you on our findings beneath the existing plywood storefront on the Elks Building. Our exploration uncovers a mixed bag of findings making it impossible to determine the original condition. We did find double hung windows with a sill height approximately 5'-0" below the sidewalk. It is hard to tell if the windows are originals. The framing for the windows is not constructed to accommodate side trim, nor does it accommodate the step from the original sandstone base to the base of column elements. The windows appear to have been eliminated with the addition of electrical, plumbing and heating systems which dropped the basement ceiling height, thus eliminating this lighting option. The retention of the lower ceiling height is necessary. I have reviewed our findings with Don Erdman our HPC Monitor. He felt either our proposed solution which continued the sandstone base across with beadboard kickplate and windows above (see attached), or installation of windows as found would be appropriate. But he felt our proposal was more appropriate for reasons mentioned and in view of maintenance. We also reviewed our finding and proposal with the Elks who voted unanimously for our proposed solution as attached. We all feel our proposal is the best solution for restoring this storefront in a historical manner appropriate for Aspen. The new window frames and storefront would match the scale and profile of the frame work existing at Esprit, but they be constructed of wood and painted gray to match. The beadboard kickplates will match Esprit' s which 11\11{AGMAN AM 1 ARMY YAW AM Dol'(I GRAYBEA! . ATA MARK 1 [EN I HORN. AM JOHN COTTLE, Al,\ -,Nt,mi,imtÂ«,im - Roxanne Ellin January 25, 1990 Page 2 we feel is appropriate, particularly after studying similar storefronts around town, for the level of building detail. A sketch section of the window sill detail also showing the kickplates is attached. We appreciate your review of this issue, before final approval. Please give me a call and I will be happy to discuss the matter further. Sincerely, 643-91/ Doug Graybeal, AIA Partner j it -4 117 11 -1 #74 .. 1-b 112% . ELKS BLDG. - * r , - kIcK PLA~Â£ TR-in OFTIOU Â«fl~ .t . (NIGHS PROFILE) ' . ,/.. '*. 4 ..'- . . .1- ELK!5 81-OG. s ILL/KIOK,PLATE 1/14190 30.1 LOU I , , -it ELKS BLDG. ki cK PLATE TAIM Opnow (NIGHOL PROFILE) HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS February 12, 1990 LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 Ms. Roxanne Eflin Planning Office FEB 1 61990 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Elks Building Final Development Review Dear Roxanne: The Elks Club No. 224 wishes to apply for Final Development Review at this time. Attachment #1 is a copy of the Land Use Application Form as submitted for Conceptual Development Plan. Please refer to Conceptual Development plan submission for other pertinent information. As discussed in our Conceptual Development Plan and during our presentation the Elks Club wishes to renovate and refurbish parts of its building at 210 South Galena. The proposed changes will have an impact on two parts of the original historic structure. First is the addition of a new elevator/stair tower on east side of building. Second is the renovation of the storefront currently servicing the Elks Club. As explained during our Conceptual Development Plan the elevatodstair tower is necessary to provide service to second and third floors. The new storefront will service retail space plus bring the building back to resembling its original condition. As part of our Conceptual Development Approval eight conditions were to be addressed. The following is a point by point response to each of these conditions: 1. Partial demolition (east elevation) shall be detailed. The attached as-built drawing A4.0 shows the existing conditions on the east elevation. The drawing also notes changes proposed. These changes are minor. Changes include relocation of some mechanical equipment and removal of existing windows to be replaced by doors to access new stair and elevator tower. [IM }11(IMAN. AM 1 ARRY YAW. AIA Dill'G GRAYBEAL.. AM \LARK HENTHORN AIA 1011% C.OTTI.E. AIA miwi nigmmÂ®lim - -- Letter to Ms. Roxanne Eflin February 12, 1990 Page 2 2. Restudy tower design transition/break between old and new to enhance appearance or separation between the old and new. This transition has been studied and improved. On the north side (rear) the inset space between the tower and the existing building has been increased and the materials at inset changed to 8x8 brick for a more perceptive separation. Please see attachment #2. On the south side (front), Hyman Street elevation of the tower, the glass panels acting as a visual separation between parts have been reorganized and set back in the building face to further emphasis the separation. See attached drawings A4.2 and 7.1. 3. All mechanical equipment shall not exceed respective roof height. No new major mechanical equipment will be located on tower roof. New equipment on existing roof will not be visible from street. 4. All mechanical equipment shall be clarified, i.e. relocated ground floor equipment, east elevation, and shown as to size and location for final. Attached drawings A4.1 shows all mechanical equipment locations visible on exterior including mechanical grilles. 5. Tower entrance detailed drawings, including canopy, windows, door and signage to be provided. The attached drawing A4.2 shows the scope of the tower entrance. All the elements are designed to be compatible with the historic building. The windows will be wood and will align with replacement windows in existing building. The windows are set back into the face of the building approximately one foot to visually divide the tower addition from the existing building plus reflect the original building treatment. The new entry doors are also set back and are detailed with a historic flavor. The entry doors include transom glass above with the building ' ~ address painted on the glass. Above the entry is a glass canopy ' covering both the new entry and back exit of Esprit. This canopy will be detailed similar to canopy over Shooters on west side of building. Between the windows on each floor is a 8x8 brick infill band. This infill will be slightly darker in color and tone than the new brick to emphasize the sepration between new and old. See attached drawing A4.2. Letter to Ms. Roxanne Eflin February 12, 1990 Page 3 In addition to the address over door on the transom glass, the building name will be located on the tower in carved sandstone as shown on drawing A4.2 and lit at night by a concealed light source as shown in detail on attachment #3. 6. Exact material representation, including sample of brick and sandstone. The materials will be presented in our meeting. 7. Maintenance plans for entire building, addressing external surface cleaning, brick repointing, storefront system repainting, etc. See attachment #4 for information addressing external surface cleaning and brick repointing. Storefront at existing Elks Club and Galena entry will be replaced. Color scheme for this area, tower and rest of building will be shown in our presentation. 8. Consider fenestration on north elevation of stair tower at landings. We have studied this option and feel it is not appropriate particularly considering the "alley" view. In reference to the second motion regarding investigation of existing storefront on Galena Street, with our HPC monitor we found the following: After removing the existing plywood kickplate panels below the storefront windows and exploring the existing upper glazing we have determined with our HPC monitor and yourself to replace the wood and glass storefront with new materials to replicate the historic. Please reference the attached drawing A4.3. The storefront will be reconstructed of wood in appropriate sizes and proportions to existing. The sill heights of the glazing, the kickplate details, and trim colors will all reflect the historic character of the building. The existing recessed entry will also be restored to a historic flavor as shown. New side walls at the recessed entry will match the storefront as will the new entry door with sidelights. Again please reference attached drawing A4.3. Also as represented during our conceptual presentation the stone base will be infilled with matching sandstone for a continuous base element. In addition to the Elks Club storefront the current entry to the upper levels will be replaced with matching wood details and glazing as Letter to Ms. Roxanne Eflin February 12, 1990 Page 4 shown on attached drawing A4.3. A new more historically accurate door will also be added. This door will be wider per code requirements and will fill the opening creating a better frame to door detail. In closing we feel this submission for Final Development Plan conforms to the representation made during the conceptual review and responds to the conditions placed upon that approval. This renovation will enhance the character of the surrounding downtown neighborhood. On behalf of the applicant and ourselves we thank you and all those involved for your time and consideration of this application. Sincerely, *44% 437&/1 MiMael DÂ¢>Â¥le and Doug Graybeal - March 8, 1990 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Ms. Roxanne Eflin 303/925-2867 HPC 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Roxanne: Enclosed please find information concerning the 2 Galena Street stoops and handicap access to the new ground level retail in the Elks Building. Also, we ask that the HPC write a memo to the Board of Adjustment which addresses the issue of the new elevator/stair tower height. The tower is 42'-6" high, which is in violation of the building height limit. However, the elevator and its machinery forces us to this height. We would note that there is to be no mechanical equipment on this roof. Please call if I can be of any help. Very truly yours, &64 8 - U Michael [~yle, AIA Associate Partner MD: sv 11\1 HAGMAN ALÂ·\ LARA YAW. AIA Illl_'GC,RAY B[AL. AM MARK HENTHORN. AIA IOHN COTTI.F. ALA /111,1111.11,Jlli!11111111111[ - / 34 - 1 r- - .*El Ir--1 9 -- 'IL-LYÂ¥?t 1 Fr-.--r----1 4 -1 11- Vt# -77 NUL. HANDPÂ·/41- 1- CoTOot 9 NEÂ¥4 f-Ethl L _ 1 L ---1 1 LE---i 31. t- - -41 F-1-~ 1!!t 11 1 1 f 1 _ _1 1 14 >4 324 1 4 1 1 il 1 1. 1 1 1 11 - 1 1 .4 1 5 1 U 1 1 U' r--1 ttl-&3 1: illil---* 4 7 r . 7 4 k -1 1 -9 1 7 / 4 No MANDFLAIL-6 612 ALION F/PÂ·-ST P-le 612- W/ ADJACE,NT WALL 6 fDOF â‚¬ SECONDAPV E NllÂ«fte ELaerâ‚¬/CAL ) I -- ALLE-9 TEL, -47 \4 . 5'_61 , OONTMOTOM- TO YÂ· 1.f I . flo" 4 4 , D 10 ..0. PITL. IJANDEAI L -- N 0- Â» EAN\10 POWL' e i:/5 MAL -TO EXIST. ARADE 0 h - -Floo'- o f . . lili 4)92 1 7 1 ~~~Handicap Entrance 1/4" = 1'-0" Attachment 2 l.. 1-0 i r- ELEA//0-0 4 --- - 8*1-1- lkISOLA-nod --*-- 5 kIEW PaCE- Ibeto< 2--''0~ . ~ t.. .~-~~>-ul'~~~Â·.VAPC)2 EW\22_1â‚¬12.~ 34>11 Glwb TYPE - A EXTE-E l 0.2 -1 --i , rl/><r - t><fx ~733-3-- *LASHI J Gi coMT. â‚¬ 52-1-rd,ACK 1.11\\ 1.- METAL --- /1 3 1 -/ - 9,3. FLY. WD FLast-+ Id 6, f 514 E-4-r'-11 k.1 4 -1 9 lic /4 - -f RE 4 Let- - 8'XE' 521(KE, 114 ~ ri -92 SETE,ACK 00 \ \ li 0/ r k .116.: - \ \0 Â»4. 1 - - <-SEAL/XMT E 194(11<LEE ROD .0-* . '1 . .1 449/44499/1 3 r //N /// Ptiovioe, 34" SEALED JOI kIT - AT EX ISTI 461 +AASON [kv ~ EXIST Id c, It,oc-2- COAL L Fc) R EXP, /CoAIT, CONIT,ZO L FLAN FETAN- 6 EXIST'1114 - JE\A,/ 14' l = 1,- O" ~.. Attachment 3 />ij:' il ; / gpo OFÂ©UZE WALLMOUNTED IPCAUDESCEUT STRIP Lle,JIT -- bull-DIÂ»G ICAME CARVED IU BAWDOTOIJC BLOali >%i ILUILDIKJG FACE PAVED COU 27 7 1 1 ELEVATIOU/SEC[lok-1 SIGLI LIQHTILIG DE~All l il li Ld I Attachment 4 SHAW Construction February 14, 1990 Mr. Michael Doyle Hagman Yaw Architects 210 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Elks Building Remodel Dear Michael: This is to confirm that the scope of work for the exterior brick on the referenced project will consist of the following: 1. High pressure wash and rinse of brick. 2. Tuck/point repair of loose and/or missing mortar. 3. Replacement of individual brick found to be disintegrated beyond acceptable limits. In addition, the metal cornice will be cleaned and painted. This metal appears that it can remain in tack with only minor areas of repair and/or replacement. Sincerely, SHAW CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Steven H. Meyer Western Slope Manager SHM/bj . CC: Ed Irwin Horizon Park Plaza 743 Horizon Court, Suite 109 Grand Junction,Colorado81506 303/242 9236 . . . 0 0 . . . 1 01 72 1 6 1 FINAL FLAT OF THE B. P. O. E. CONDOMINIUM U LOTS M., 4 4 M. 51*. 14 ALLEY BLOCK 14 K Orâ„¢ 0/AD,EN, COLDKAED \A ( UNCEMeKOUNIP UTIL(-TIEÂ» IN ALL-E'l ) 06 -' - ./ . _ JV -IlJ~~4~ ~-/ 4/ - - 6 OWNER'* CEET- 1F ICATE : KNOW ALL KIEK! 139 THESE FRE*ENTD TRAIT- -THE DENEVOLENT 5 76Â°0991" E CofÂ·01 2 0 10 \2223 (14- i PÂ·44*~ PMOTECTIVEL ORDE.lt Of- 51-1Â«2, Al:FEN, COLDIÂ«EU, LOPGE NÂ°. 224, 1 4 BL"TRICAL- 7-AAN:5- ~r-Â·,r. Ir'~==~.f-flu \ il-Y' --p <r :<i-=~- --43 - il ENEZOXHM- ~- 5 fOBJÂ·lf-A EAM.MENT I J [22] - CID UNX -1- 0.9- P. ,Â§$ TO THE CITY. U r=J (33 c= 223 ch-- -1 . -217% . h 3-NE OWNER OF CEKTAIN LANE>D (N THE Cl-r-1 OF X5754 FITKN /4, 1. I CENDE .*i[0* J CE] ED [U] EU] [El COLUTH, COLONACED. 30 WLT t LOTO K, L, 4 MI, 91-CCK 14 6.-CT-1 / /1 6/ 91~F 'thk- 4 -TOWbibITE OF AbF'EN, COLOFT:/J21Â· POD HEZE.l>! CERTI Fl 9*419X + / f / / / / 2 ng Riff**FI],FIJ[=Wi e~ 7Â»91.2.9 TIÂ«T- THM, M,AF OF THE 15. F. 0. E. CON[Â©h,(INCOM Mep 155Â·EN k).1 92hJ.- T 79 1~... PM<EF>NKEP FURÂ»U/KNT- 10 Tk-IAT- CEIKTAIN 915Â«TEMENT OF .GL-__*L_--1;L_.1_66_151-M A--j!- It , 1 CLE] 6/11 E-~==F-i~ / EXE.MFT-ION FKDM THE DEFINITION OF OUDDLVIâ‚¬>CON 6N>AkITECP i\ LE 2-3 CZE OJECE-' .e. i CEI 066/ALL VV \ '.1/IN -REET - H X_/ 1/ _ \ / _1'C= 54 THE AerEN C.(TH COUNCL ON , 1189/ 4 20'Fo/6.0'/ ~, 004/1~ETE STE.F J EZZE] 0 = =-3 2-33 f-1 === c00 3--Â·Â·g#,6,.--~=;9=,LE b Â·Â¢ 2 / i ' OF -THE KECOF<[25 OF- THE CLEAK 4 KECOK[>EK OF FITKIN COUNT'f, 3 223 CLE] EnEE [23 L_= CE n F-jlÂ¥EnT-14 . I r-:lU RECORDED 1169, IN F>QOK ACT FAGE. 64:5 vISTEC 0/ate. ; COLOF,AED, 4 FUBDUÂ»FT- TO THE FUIVDDED *TATED IN -1-HE 1 YANPOW:WELL_ 1 ! 1 >4///// - -. UZZI O [LS -1 1 .11 COK'COMI NIUM DECL-AlÂ«FION FDM. THEL D. F. O. E CON[PDMINIUM . i . 6 L.O'/W 9/// III - . 81 t=j trs L_3 = lid'==i 1 " IKECOFU7EO , IlÂ©9, IN FbOOK. -7 'her OF- 53Â·Al P COUNTG'l RE.COF<Th R Â°t' t/ * t=g~E~ 1 1 .1 774 842fy/ L / L b M A CHAIKMA+1,150,Â«P OF T.F.09-rEE5 102. F.O.E. Af>FEN, COL-ORAPO - V/ --0, '.< 1 1 / 4/ilig~i. ~14 UnbE hiÂ°. 214, *70.0,22 . / i < 4== 4-4 . u__f-w Â£- ~ _. -.- COUNTH OF- YITKIN .2 12 42 i- 9 A n L th - '2- -// A ~1 17 < _- 1 5.5 ' -ir - -\ 91Â»-E OF COLD?Â«EKD) - 4 1 r. r V -10 / I Â» 3.1 -tz pok- 1- P 14 -- 2 . 9 .> : VICINITY MAF SCALE 14 - 1020' 11-IE ECKE.60(NG INÂ«TMOMENT y(Â» AE.KNOWLEOSE.13) IteÂ·FOFâ‚¬ I k ~-- ME 11-4 1-7 - PAPI OF' . 11,1, Fyi: tri-- 1 1 3% ,45 CHAI IKMEN OF THE DO,AgP OF TKUâ‚¬FT-FLE-9 OF- THE - N 76Â°09* I," 4 C 2 5, U & 6.6 ' tt. F. O. E. ASPEN, COLOFKÂ»PO, LOCEE NÂ°. 22.4 7 9,5-01.11â€žg212-44' h /4 6 / ASPEN CIT'f COUNCIL AFFIKDVAL. - WITNFE-h Â»tÂ»-*%-0 t OFFICIF-LÂ«-11 h 9 f : -1-Hle CONOOM[NI UM FLAT OF UHE FE, F>. O. E. CONEDMIN LUM \14*52 Ml COMMIÂ«>CON EXPIKeD : 0 AFFROVED 64 THE CITy OF /KSrEN CITH COUNCIL ON THE t y f Â« / L 'N N Â· 6 / : ~ mi NOTAKV MUFbLIC. 40 75.09'/P'>1 07-- r.05 :~AV OF- Â· ~ Â£le>t : 11 1 1 Â· . SIGNED -1+416-5*f OF , ! led, ADUKEFÂ»: 45 /8-41 8 /1: . / 5 75'09'//"Â£ : . 0421 4 THREE STD!271 MASONIÂ«1 OUILE)(NG / : hhÂ«cle< = TITLE CEATIFICATE: / / / v,rn-1 8.0,~seMENT / / 41 1 4-5.30 ATTEST. PITKIN Ca)N-El TITLE, ILIC., A FULH LICE.NOED 1NSA.Jled\ICE 11.1 1 1 4-THE ELe> 1:50! LO,t~Â·46 " / 57.41& DWEK Â¢ A Z 41 3 . ELEVA*MÂ· atiAFT /I 0 -1 061 20123 K, L L V'I, BLOCK 614, 6[7-9 4 TOWN 91-TE CE-,AaFEN, Â· 0/1[PEE\CONST. ~ i~ CITH C.LE AaENT IN TME *TATE OF CLOKA[Â© ME-KE,1 CERTIFLEO TM,Â« TkIE 13. F. 0. EL . /Â»FE-14, COLOgARD, LOIÂ»E hiÂ°. 224 19 THE. P . . OWNER. IN FEE 9 MFLE OF D. P. o. E. CONEDMI NIUM 6'TUAT]=. z .h 7 l\ B ~ 4 V\ /4: I l S N 1 0 ON: 6/ i.=\ ~ ~ <~~~~.'~ ~_-~:.1 FL,A--1-- OF-THE D. r. D. E. Cor\113>OMINCUM, - PITKIN COUNT-"f -7! TLE, INC. CITV ENGINEEFRA'e AFF"R:O\AL: COL>NTH OV FITKIN, STAT-E Or C.OLOMÂ»IX). ~ $ I, , 6-[TH EK.161 WEEN FOR. -THE c(-T-q or *Un) JECT- TE) Et<DEMIEN-Pp, KIGHTD-OF-WAM 4 ENCUIVIMEN\CELS herEN, COLOFALÂ©, 00 HER.ELE,q AryMOVE- THIS CONDOM[N IUM ' OR- MI.ECOK(32 ATE.17: . DIGNED Thi 15 PAl oF , I 161. 271: rÂ»1: VloENT J MI6END, J C ITH ENIGE NE.58.~ rfimel [PEN-E 04 / / STATE Of- C.OLOMAEÂ© 1 8- N 75Â°059' 4'*/ - *m &~Ir jilin~-4 8 CLEÂ»< 4 FECCE-PE<'57 ACCEPTANCE: COLUPI OF FLTKIN F Tule PLAT *Aft, FILED FOR RECOI<P IN THE OFFLOE OF -THE THE FOF:59<31 NS, /Nâ‚¬pTFUMENT- **p ACKNOWLECASEXP BEBDKE rIT:<LIN COUNTH CLEKK. 4 F.ECORPEK AT--D'CLaX- tvl., ME THA- MAM OF' , (1 59, 54 VICENT J MI6END 1-ME FAV OF ~ 189+ 4 Â£9 KECoggED 45 FRE-51 OENT- Or FITK IN COURIT-4 TITLE, INC. rt-AN-TE< 1 ~ IN FLAT- moolt - MT MAGED KECEFTEON hiÂ° WITNESS NIN MANIP 4 OF-FIC-l.AL DEAL 5 - 0.8/ ~ :25 f !Â»141 COMMEÂ«LON EXPLNE.5 4\ CLERIC 4 RECOR:PE< e - i l i -mi j i i 1 -12 2 W 0.55 , 1 1 , -ID 31 2' / KICITONÂ«! FUR>LIC- 1.65 to.(3' 0-0 .17.0'/ / Â»14 / 5%.\91 / P.Ily / FKOFEKTM LINE L ~ FPENESÂ© t- rr + . 1-1.-lilitil F-Â·P 21 ern-L 6 2-7 4 G,UL- 9 ~T, COÂ¢EKES> / OPEN +*TE,57*v,J 9| - N 76Â°09'll" VK Â· 10.27' Â·Â· ''Â·<*<'t 401 09' -4 2' m 6~ UNC'EgNEATÂ·H ~ .. lillilll~ ~--91405)99"m- 4.0' SET: EEDAM. 4 CAF 44 .2---12.0, - b 9 24305 / eURVEVORÂ» CERTIFICATEÂ· 4 9>EFTEMDER , I1O1 A 50<VEPI *49 FERFOKMEP UNDER M.1 N 75Â° 09' 11 Â· w 95.0, 125' / KNCBOACHMENT- LICENY;EL Â· , S PAN[EL E *19<ENZLIE, HEREB+1 CE-KT-lrof DAT IN AU6091- . 53>IKECTION K SUTENVItION OF Larb lt, L d M, M>LOCK. 94, CITH 4 TOWNSITE OF- Â»E,FEN, COLORACRD,Â· -TÂ»I THE -THKEE ~A *TOR-4 MAOON!71 loul upiNG WAe FOUNIO TD 5& LOCATE[7 AD j f < UNDE,e6*DLED CIT--4 \MATEPE- UNE ) 91-+OWN HE.KELON. TI+E LCE.AIT-CON 4 PIMENSIONS Or -THE - ' SOUNDAMP{ 1-{NES, UTI LITLE'O, IMYROVE.MENT# 44 EASEMENTD 0 4 21 le 24 32 40 F-Err IN EX/1175-NCE OR KNOWN -TD ME /ARE ACCUNATEM *MOWN H Y MAN Â· Â» V EN U E e<LA l.-E kf u = 110 i[ CH THY) MAE 4 THE N+Ar ACCUKATEL.Â£1 4 9:;Ult>STÂ»FTIALLÂ°1 C 74.8 -FT. W I GIE ) 19/ele Or- IDEAKAbleâ‚¬2, FDOND GIrl MIONUMENT-9 9. W. COINEA 15'ErICITD THE LOCATEN J- THE WILDING, 4 -THE VILIQU-(CAL- 4 19>LOCK 74 4 N.W, COKNEA fOLOOK 15 (614Â°50'49"W 74.20'), HORIZONTAL 1OIWIEHOIONS) OF THE INDIVIQUAL AIR SPACE UN[-TD OF- THE D. r: O.S. C.ChÂ·ltÂ»MINIUM THEREIN Â¢ TME.IKE,ON, ENCRLOAC,-4MENT- LICENSEÂ· eKANÂ·t~rED *1 125*CLOTZON OF THE UNLT DESIGNATIONO -THEKEOF UNDER. -tHE [NOTKUCI[ONO CIT'l OFADFEN CNT-9 COUNCIL, RE*oLD-r-ION NO. FREDVIDED ME 2*1 -THEE. 0/+IS.F;4 THE MEASUP<EMENTD OF SAIP UN175 4 -THE El_EVANOne OF- m-IE Fi-COM.'5 4 CE{LI Net>. Sally VIAF AL'50 ACCUft*JELM PEFICT# ALL ENIC_Ko-MEND 191 OK. ON THE *UFbt.7-ECT FROFENTM, REFEKENCE 19 MEKETÂ·yl MAPE -TE) FITK[h CaJNTH TITLE FOL[CH ChiÂ°. FOX APPI-11OHAL EAOEMEND OF KECO/247 IF AN<-1 cpÂ·DNE). ke.:St. EXECLUTEIP THI':b--8-PAY of=- ~;227 ' i f~ Â©FÂ®Â«2#>' R,11f~ ALF C NE el)*Vact* 1 NO 4 1 20151 : S .... 14 <i~9+414.c 1:54: EPANIEL FE MCKENZIE, 4.9, '23191Â·~EAL 40'0 NOTICE Accord,ng to Colo,ado law,ou must commence any INal actior Surveyed e 20 M C UFZATE) Revisions 11 21 01 Title CONEÂ©MNIUM 31Â«F 91-lE ET ONE oF- TWO Job No M - 84 Dased upon any defect in this survey -thir S 'rears after you first discover Alpine Surveys, Inc. Drafted 6 -30 - 01 D.2. e 5 10 Client 5.r. 0.EL. such defect In no event mayanyaction based upon any defectintrussurvey 7Â· 17Â· 70 becommenced morethan ten years Irom the dateof the certificalon shown Post Office Box 1730 herein Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 2688 . 0 . . . . . 4 2%01 m 11 44 ) rfrfcAL ARK( fiff Â«11Â°.1 TELEDYNE POST N02859 , 41 F> - Exier. Sl,De. 1~41Â£u.1 El-t\/ /67-Aie -rZ>WEIE / \7/ 0 , --- 1--O E,*IST-ING 1363(1 /t) '' **lili - - - ...000.-0--/~IIl-- 14773-ZE) al - '111, - - - -7 0 1062612 Ah 111 j - -6--------- lili 111111-7*==79 WN&&62@61 - -----1----I---.Ii--Ill#----*I..I.--i-%---I--P-- I-~--i-.~1#u--*-.---<--W----4-- -~---+ r.1 ' I)..-------i &1 jjÂ£.Ili-Ii'-_~-$~~ 42- -G"ET - i Â«212 -u t=~ =7---~Lic:-=-I--2 4 - T===11 - p 1 Ill~31 986 4 -_u 0 1-3 - E- 1 ENTIRE BUILDING EXT. 1 SANDSTONE BANLE 0 1- 1 Lf 1101 - 1 1 -- TO BE CLEANED. 2 ---- 7- BRICK TO BE TUCKED Follt-,- LE 40 LL-11 1 . u I -re,- â€¢SUBFule. 1 -- AND POINTED -- - - Ce O-0.04 * jt_-4Â«449_199-f- BRICK. SIMILAR IN SIZE & COLOR TO EXIST. BI.DG. ,%. - - ___1-1_2-q-Ant_ - 1 r -2 -1 1-1 5.1 -1 1 - - 1 - 0 = -1 -- U-'62]~1__IN< 14 - ='INi IR_ ~- ~ i- 4 j -2 4] 7 4--- 1 -1--11 - - - 70 53*L R . -llnl -ETE] 373 - TRANSLUSCENT CANOPY - ---- - I Ir ~ *141 -if--~J~ --9 - -- I 1 - -- -11 1 li ~Lig FZBC--F---2- .1 h I 1 - 1 1 1 - 00 .I - d_._11-1_'612|u'Â·1 - .1. 41'i~kill.!1-1 9 MU 1 -0 SLIEFLE .11 11 1 11 11 1 111 111 It 1 1' Â· JI~ I :11,1 4 :Â· Li, Ii.:,1:11:11 1 1.11 19'1 IM,1.~1~~,~T- 111 ? FO'-0' ' p \ - 4 NEW SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING--- 93 tdol-E Â· ALL ALUMINUM 1,Â·dllk.IDOWS S ,-5422 Lâ‚¬.4Â£06 fo &6 2*F'LAC.Â·12/t, - - WEST ELEVATION AL, WOOD -Dâ‚¬>u. HUN.le All N Dob....1 9 SOUTH ELEVATION All - /~ 2/ al-AID> E-*-76121 Â©FL . HAGMAN YAW 7 ~ ARCHITECTS ~i ~ LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ~~ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ~ 303/925-2867 , NE[,4 lEIVELÂ«#12 -rb\Â¢â‚¬2 ~f EX 1<brl Kle E...l'EDO NEW STAIR/ELEV. TOWER. r STAIR/EL.EV. TOWER BEYOND ~ , 1 -- - 0 0..10 27 - -R I - -6 =f-Yu r----=-- t.+24 + - 6 4 - 20 -11~--1 rm+4-]03[ip =th-- =-= - - - Â»-- -cj ~-pujj<-13 v#forki--1 - - 1 tl O O . C= - - . ISSUE: ---I - -Â«T _i-2- F --1 k . uÂ·-_ unv==z~- REVISIONS: ----- - - 1# 111 -I------- -2Â»-f 1-f~-Â« LI--fi~f-Plf --fi_~ 2-7~b - - 0 9 -- E -Off |i 1 i 1 0 4,1 199 11=21 - I -- - ME'E Elio ---_=~ _~ 9 -114--19 - 1 - 1- - - -- REROOF AND PAINT ATTACHED --- - - -- BLOCK STRUCTRUE - 1 - RELOCâ‚¬110 MEGH GRILL - --==--------- F | -JIL:=23Â«==iff ~~-5/~ --- '-3 -- - - -- r -- W - 2~Z~-12-UNE--~--liI.-~zz-57---GAS 21_2 ~ ----- - ---Inn- IL- -- 2 Â·. RELOCATE MECH. EQUIP- - - RELDCATEP 445 Â»|ETER 3 A*.2 A4'c EAST ELEVATION . _ NORTH ELEVATION A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Â©1988 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS,LTD. p j 4 1 9 1 1 4 ___11 9---~ 4 I. 0 11 IdÂ®@d --/ 111 ' .....I- .3... . -------- -1- =~= ----------- --- -- ----- 11Â«- --p-7-13- --9--+T-- , - 11 1 -- 1111, \ --- -- - |U _ _ --~ || |i| =:~ -zÂ©0 1 - -- Ni -- ------ 1 1 , - i ------- E- r- 0 1 -- [-1 --- 0-1 3 7121 - - 7 - E- O F- 1_ : I 1 [---- 1 0-~1 7-1 ET--1-FT=JI___ju-f_th f] 1- I -L_ 1 - t] -i f --- L_ T- r - 1 [=1-1 --I-T 6 1- - 1 1- - F _in-lan- -1 --tr -Ek- 1 1 111 ; 1 1 1 El--1 1 1 - =-' --"_ ~---=--J Fl -Elil ----L-]-- --Lf~Lrr4 ]EPL-203-- 3~r ~~~ 3~-El, 4 i Il - 4 4. 6-- . - 1 1~ w- - _ 1 -_fl-E=ZI_-1--1 - --r r- E==f * EnÂ»-7-17--F--- C E=r--1 -- __ _ _-I ELI - - - . - En-- 111 - ~ --- -101 1-~- ---~3141-'ELIE . Â«d, . ':, 1- 4-1 1 - I Ill 1 1 0-0 --- = 2-22_-7-_-- -- , __- - L---1 L--~-. 11 Â¢ 111 1,1 J lili 1 Z IF771 111.-411 b L.-- ~ WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 1 â€ž 1 11 + I 14 -- 1,-01 Â» HAGMAN YAW - ARCHITECTS 11 0 210 Sol'TH GALENA L ASPEN. COLORAD081611 ' 103 925-2867 EXISTING~ \41 NDOW/5 To K| EM/ D FE. k| l ido, 1 h| EX i b-1- 1 k| Qi OE REMOVED. OPEkll X160 5Â£1011 WALL, SALVA#E 159.-ICIC TO bE blrICKEP SoLI D TO ' /' FOR. USE IN PATC.1-1 ING, ID<IST'44 7.1 AATCH %)<ISTÂ®.a, ~47 07241#45,- , - A . 1 t il 0 ...10 ' 4 Â«-1-4 024 --- g - 101 r - 71 1 4/1 1 /1 -- - - 2 - --i-- 1 / 1 'P==11 - - -2~1 +2 1@ It L_~_1 fi t=21 b o C=I t==t ISSUE: F 6 1 , "190 1-- ..RFIERI 1 1 l 1 '1 - 7 11 REVISIONS: i 11 1 00 0==1' 4 1 L===11 -- 1 1 :L- 1 1 i====== -- Â·Â·Â·Â·-*------ H r----1 Â· -- 1 1 11 11 - --- 1 ----- ----- ExIST. Alle IKITAKE - 1 TO DE RELOCA-rep --7--~-~ - -4 - ~ ~~ I~ --1- ---- 211-_ ~27-17 7- O-27=-2-7-1=- .- ~ --/ -_- - h 1 - EXIÂ«TINA HANGICAP -GAS -- ENT / EXIT, 70 FLEMAN ---_~i_ METE e__- -1 -- 1 - ~ il#--912--%----./--- i/kEEAWLL _ - 2- X -i_297Â«-3=*-4112.-.-_7.2 .-- __I . -- - 19 A 12-ENU>VE Ex\ST'44 -/ ~ EXETI KIC, MEGA, m be -EXIE>TIUG TO EFAN kl '6/ 1 N 'POW T PATCH â‚¬ELDCATED, O'PEN I AIGa .. EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION - I.- , 11 1 0 1 11 4./-0 /8.1 -O AS BUILT ELEVATIONS A4.0 *4 1 Â©198811AGMAN YAWARCHITECTS,ITD. -2 27- El 1-1 - ~'. 1 i| 1 '| '4 ' 1 C~#.'I"...~ ~ 4 4 i. It'--1 5.1 -1 f / 'F 7-1 4> r P - 014Â®@ 1.11 4 - - - 1-- -1---7 149 - 19-21------- - ---2&--51553- ~ .-~ ----+- -- -*- -- 1 21 -- -1-11 -- "- - -. - _---- - - lili - 1144 1 1 ====== 9 F 1 " - - REMOVE EXISTING PLYWOOD -- ENTIRE BUILDING EXT. ~__ E-- ~_Â®i- 1 ---~~ IN -A- 15 TV4M~- Irj-4]r-~E=jEF -piry--]r-~1 14---~___~ .. _It--12 r --.=66Â·16.-=_ - SANDSTONE BANDS TO BE CLEANED. _--- AND WINDOWS - REPLACE WITH 01 7- P 1-r--- 1 4 1 11[ 11 NEW STOREFRONT AND KICKPLATE BRICK TO BE TUCKED SIMILAR TO THE TREATMENT - -- AND POINTED --- - - .rE.--.--- - BRICK. SIMILAR IN SIZE & (21 - r Â«2=712=I=Zir--ILL-~-3 -- --+X-â€ž- AL _ AT REST OF GROUND FLOOR LEVEL Tr -1 _ - - . 21% I f. 6 'F 1 - 4 14 U 1 -------~ - ~ COLOR TO EXIST. BLDG. lm-A_F_ -f>-9 E--11--br ifÂ»-4-tr3F-*ir_L~~* _+2 114 8 1 - 1-t- 1 -pl---- - r 1%=rii - 1[-1-Â®1 lEi! 12%21 liZir-,~i ]271=13~F INIZ- 1-22-i= -Â·- - p --- - - , - 1. - - I. 1 0 1--_-1 1 -_ 11 - ---1 4-l'-2 -- 411- FLHL_44:~1~-49'L_ 1- Ld tr- }H 'FL-2 -1 -2- - -6--- -L -- -> 1- --rEITI _1.._.__-_-_----. --7 -- - 11Â·69_k __ --- _-4-1__.--- Ul_ I j-- I $ S . ~-llITVITIFI[tr=~~ in-u ~~___j~q Lil~ - - - --th#1TI.I.irlol ~p>- -tr- ---- ~~~ ~~---~-Atff~-R----- -. TRANSLUSCENT CANOPY 7\ r------1 I /L_lf--- I~ '- // 1 1 111 -- - - 11 10 411| Il p --=12___~==r==:=--i-=-11-9-~ ~~ M 0 0 0 01"1 19 1 f. 10+11 ill H --_ 4-4 -- L 1 2 -- . 1 . . fl 1 IL-'El 6--1 ,--rÂ·---r---pT,Ibi,4 1,11' 51'I ' III:I : -T'i ; 44!14 i"Â·,P F~ LI ,~.~,:Ilill !' _~11.~-] , u._i_.. _..11:'lli.liÂ·, ii E.-1FE@1119~1-=====t IWITITI!Â·1111O~td:I'Iiz::,:.~* IliTE-ELP,lif~11-337-1,il[ j,Ir.' 1.1,---_C__L.2:&;flkiHIifi,LFIIIIIJI ~---- EAST ELEVATION _@QUI-!i-El*-*yEQL.____--_____ ~ HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303925-2867 NEW STAIR/ELEV. TOWER STAIR/ELEV. TOWER BEYOND j --- 0 ... 10 - - CE:77-- -~ - 2 - -- L LILIE..22- -I- ---- ~ --Â«- *~06>tr ---It E ISSUE: ~__ 8 Uzzl C*Â«571Â»===~1 ~ ~- - - . 1 - -- ~9Â«9494- -- - _f -ft/MA 1.-- -=El 1 -2.-- - --- -1- 1 -7 - REVISIONS: 1 1 -=43 L 2- -- - --- -- -/1 lizz=n -0& Â· _1 .1 - --7-2-7 4---4.F =L=13222-----.--W5-&. / ---- -- - .2--~222*~ - - ---IL- 1 -- REROOF AND PAINT ATTACHED --------- BLOCK STRUCTRUE _-=i i 7 916~ -- n. 11 - - 1--ill-W- ~-.--------6- --il.+-Ill-#i--- - - -- --- I L U-- --'- - -- RELOCATE MECH. EQUIP- - WEST ELEVATION _ - _NORTH ELEVATION PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" l Â©1988 HAGMAN YAWARCHITECTS,int). r __ _ - ' *'i _ FOUN[ X" IN LKS No.224 r ' ' _1~-9mâ„¢ Â·' ... - I.-9-'. - . Â·Â· ~- *.3 2915 7 1 + ..4.1 Â»2 t.p 4 1.1.1. 3 1:; 1.. C 1\ .) i 0 .0 . ... .. . . . . . . 0. -- . 0 .I . . . = D .:A. 0 . ..:. .. I .: 0 1 4 1.:\ 1 ,* CH( 1..:1111( 41] I. - A ... D. . A. 1 - .. . 0 1.- .: .. . 0 .. . 0-AD. - D . 0 1 .2 .A . 0 A=. 0 -:I.-0.-1 . ...AD e . ...:1 ... A . 0 & D Il. . Al ... .... .. A. & . I . la A.- . .: 0 .A . ... . - . e . .:: I . . 0 A 1 - .. . 0 . .:0 1 .. , .. ... = - hi A imi -- . 1 I. - : ... 0 .. .0 11 3 \1 A \ I ... .. . 0 -0 - .. 0 : A.- - . .All .: I I . 0 :. 0 - 1 I e *1 ... .>39+1:An' ~--Â· .. .0 1,01 $ 7 1. Â¥ - 2 Â·st L -ffla"w"*,3 1 it 1.21.2. .*ill=..1- '*.6 0 . ' d .U f . ~ *fi -,#A~-fli9~1 .........''./ E~16%hial*~2 :<.11 4 /41*'.1, .0-. 1Â· t 5. 1.- -1 .401Â£ 0=.11:/4 flilli# _L -L lili --.--.I----L4--1.-r "L_TI , I-'-1 -~ 1 -_-I---I---Il -__~-___ .~..__-__ ____ ~___ 722~ 2~-1-7 JUI~,~_ 2_I_"Lg~1-~ 0000 0000 33 E-=3 0 1 - LI -1 2 1 1 -1 - E,)<16-[1116, Â·Fly,90. -- -1 f WINDOVVS -10 11>E- RE-fAC>VE-0 LLE - -ri -1- ' 1 1.~ y.: r. 0 i. 4-1 IgILL --- EXISTILIG DOOR ' *-T Li . TO E REMOvED 1 .3Â»44-i .1 REMOVE EXISTIUG . -274' . 4-Lâ€ž T DOC)A *SIDE PALIEL '- __ 2.1 __ - ._ ...~ __ ' ~- r IREMOVE MEOH WELL 1 ./ ch GALENA ST. STOREFRONT - PARTIAL ELEV. @ 1/4" 210 SOUTH GALENA HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 LTD 1 ' El 92Kal 1 K -- --I-Â£_[ L. 2 'i ._-,t rL.' =00 00 n- i Al 0 ... 10 1-01 LILd-LL . --2-,â€ž 0 f - m f~ -1-~ 0 - UE\V \VODD ec>FFIT r /1 ' T ge.*l STORE-Fechil- - Â¥ *AZ-/del 4 -1 ISSUE: 1 dÂ®UG 11 + 1 REVISIONS: DJ-1 . -1- 1 - 04 2Â£4060*20 - - . 111 1 11 1 lilli - - 1 001 1 | */CK.FLATE To :,1.1!21,1! L lit - UEW DOOR FOK EREGS MA-rcH EXIST/}44 AEQUIRELMEL.r[.5 \4WEW FRAME 4GLAZIUG ABOVE . 1 6 9-SPFLIT. K.IE~/ DOOR 4 MÂ«i.HIUG --: -4. -_1 -3 - .-1 - STOREFROUT' (BEYOUD) - t-70- . 1 9 NEW 5AbleSTON/6 -19 MATCH Ex/ST-(Alca T ~*___-=GALENA ST. STORRFRONT - P~OPOSED_ELEV_Â«1/1"- - . al, 4 .* .*#*1.4 - -. '.+ :Â·*Ag#21.'..9*/AP<':4.62*U~~L- )- Â·>Â·12 2 -f A4.3 Â©1988 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, CTD. f 4 ----- N j ALLEY r L - S - .I f--66.6~L..64 5 - HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS ~ LTD 210 SOUTH GALENA ELKS BUILDING r .NEW EIEV./STAIR TOWIi R MASON & MORSE BUILDING }03 925-2*7 ASPEN, COLORAJ)081611 -. LINE OV ROOF ABOVE ./ t P 1 3=3 + .l 1 A . 1-- 1 IEEE , 0.,1, - 1 ~= - 14-Â»1 7 1 11 PN ISSUE: REVISIONS: 1.ANDSCAPED AREA : a Ki u , - - - -- NXIÂ»- NORTH 8 Z ' 2 i v I 9 1 -flh /Th> IC 1 1 4 1- 1 \0\ 1Â©11 1,71 51 /1 1 1 24 -1 / ' I ./ HYMAN AVENUE SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ~ GALENA STREET 1 1 1.-1 - 4 L 7 1 ALLEY ~ L r| . ELK'S CL I --hEMODEL ' ...'..4* 1 1 11111112 6-95Â®* 1 ~910[ _ .1111111111111111111111111111 1 1 6-4 1 I 4.- NEW STAIR/ELEV. TOWER L-i ARCHITECTS - LTD < ELKS BUILDING A.=9-Ill/-1 MASON & MORSE BUILDING - 210 SOUTH GALENA r--:' 1 9-- 1 _ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303 925-2867 4 i 12 HAGMAN YA LÂ«41 1 706;F-- Z CD 1 - .. 0 0..1, III 1 ~ 11 - 1 1 2-mt L.-- -r--1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ISSUE: -CANOPY ABOVE ~ REVISIONS: LANDSCAPED AREA $02-ru k E X \\ 1/ ' I CO 1 1 11 11 lili '111 1 2 0 / ..i 11 11 ; -r- 2 W 1 4 PIll. > rÂ» 1 \ %0 \ 1 -0 1 b 1 1 1 1 2 - \O*49 HYMAN AVENUE - 12 SITE PLAN Gti'* -/ SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" - v. 7 j*FVR' 7-- 4 1 . 1 1 1 1 L ' il'. 1 i 70 Tr>We,EL __--~$*'-6" 11, 11 4.- _-1- i-4- -----4 - - -t-F i i 1 14 - - -- - T - /Vgy-5-''NIATE>Â« PLEF 0/=- HAGMAN YAW 6,~.,Perchâ‚¬ bATA N l - ARCHITECTS -- 7 -- ~ 67</ er/Ne EU-0 - - - - LTD - - - 210 SOUTH GALENA li.; -- - -- + - + - - ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 1 - I - - 30Â· 64#944. 4 /2 -9 _ *pÂ·106 VENEÂ¥- OveFÂ· ,//,- - L_--- *--1-- '-1 - G,TUD Ne,L Cotâ‚¬. - 1-1 NNOF- 61/AAILAF- IN CLUF L -1 1 48/76 m e>tefe -Mil -- - - 1-- DlÂ»e - - 1 -ar Â¥-a ISSUE: ~ -1 1# r F. . r-4 1 REVISIONS: r--4 r--4 r--1 1 1 - - Der, leN t.,6 \Etor/AGNT- _1 .. ER Â· 4 0.0 60*FLIL f #Plo t Â· /7 10 7 _t- U -' b I __.--1 ' I 1 - ----- - 1 - 1 RED//DED FEE /2, ADc - - --/;..r% I - -- --- 1- 1 - 2 Â° ~ â„¢-1-_ 3 -39435 566Â£71 Ax 1 8(Affo CPNOM --- Ll 1 L -1 - , - L f- . 11 --<. '. 1 - - 71 1 - 4%*AST..i~N - *5042 EVIN -1.- - - 020/4 -r- _1 j j - A-- I.-i.--1- - â€¢r- -4 -1--CANEC) 900â‚¬'FENE --TAT- __ -' li |ELie,Bull.DIkj- - 9(eN t-1 ! 1 It 11 . 11 -- - -- - - - -U-~JZILInZ~_7 -_22 t- 4_ 1% 1- ---- -- - III---2- -_L=*A- -1 -- --1 1 ~ To- _5,64â‚¬/a. Â¢/2=t'*- . mo 1 -- il 1/ 11. 4-- 1 . 1 . MUU - 4" DPÂ·NN FITE FrotÂ·,6 OAN0V~9 - Er'COME M'ON' 6.6,[TbANCE ZD pel/VaL (ATTACNED TO BLDG.) Tb 69FhÂ·[r -- South Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" Stair/Elevator_TowerL_ Stair/Elevator Tower Stair/Elevator Tower A4.2 East Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" - North Elevation 1/4"= 1'-0' -1Â©1988 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD. 1 1 lili 1 1 1 1 - - -- 1.-'.1- -'...1- ~â€¢ir l t i - - - - - at Z.... Tro Â·47 00 0000 mon -- w ~- 1- 1 *15-Tibld, -Fl_YWO. - ' 70 94\NpoWS -10 - Os REMOVED 1=14 -- 111[' ' 1-4 '-4 7 - 6 1 1 72'. 9.12 & 14*- 2 0 "11. T 1 4 -- EXISTILIG DOOR . TO 62 REMOVEO i L- . ' .I REMOVE EXISTI UG 4.Â£ t.2 ' 3-4-13 : DOC)A Ge>IDE PAUEL - -- -- p--- -- -L --- 1 nIIUm..Ir-- - REMOVE MECH WELL .... /h GALENA ST. STOREFRONT --PARTIAL ELEV. @ 1/4" (1 } -- - - HAGMAN YAW 210 SOUTH GALENA ARCHITECTS LTD ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303/925-2867 . 2000 =00 00 -T , - ELLI -LIL] 0 LIF===1 r--3 -r-'==] -- 0- , 0.1,0 -7 - 1 - =zi-=- _ uE\U WOOD) BOFF(T - ' -IÂ« 11 i cu_ 11 1 - r 1 , 4 : I gE-\61 Sroel=aodT - 44 f P f f 46.4 2/44 - J 1-1- ~~-Â£4 ~ 1 ISSUE: FE 5.15 0 1:13.I. . 1 T=- [ r---1 1-- 1 f FRONIT?11 1 1 REVISIONS: =1 11 1 7!0 -ill -1 - 41' If - 1T 1110 IIi 6 1- L 9 11=0 ...7 TÂ·:Â·Â·iltt..:.4 Li: - ~~~f*p*Â£Â£2 - ---1 1 --77 1 I 1 1 It 11111 1 1 11'11,1 1.h"fll#k ~ 4'111.11(14|J-'7~17[Ji [rt~ZI(JEJEF~j -- ----~ DOOR FOREGRE-65 MATcH EX!â‚¬Tt k/4 - 111 ' 1: , 111 1 1- 7 REQUIREMEL,rES *# PEW L).1/'.'.6 j' 1../.ill * ' -;gj .e....t././1./... 6 55,</T, . -- ---I FRAME 4GLAZIUG AMVE MJEW DOOR 4 MAL,HIUG ~ - r- + -- 1 i .. -4 1 1 11 STORE FROU-I' 02>EYOUD) - 4-----~ 1 - 1 / NEW 5414O5Tode -79 MAil~ e<'s-r-<46/ - - Ue\v ETEP 4&DE-WALK DE\4 â‚¬iTE,5431DEWALK-- -- ~21# GALENA ST. STOREFRONT - PRQPOSED ELEV. @ 1/4" , 1 - -- - 1.-- -I...../.Ill- ~1 -..#- --- ---~ -- i- A4.3 Â©1988 HAGMAN YAWARCHITECTS,LTD. j - A kai 26!%.; Â·Â· ' '*14.W.L.,92 .-..c*~Er.- ---c.â‚¬2-~ l 1, /5A 7-2, -7 my , j V ft-1 -7-- HAGMAN YAW 4 , E---7 ~1 -1r--7--4 _ ARCHITECTS 2 0 35 210 SOUTH GALENA LTD 1 1 ' 1 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 41 / 1 1 1 303/925-2867 / I. 1 1 ! +13' f -1 . 1 1 1 1 1 *1 1 TH"W FLI 1 ' 94 4 - - A 7.1 21 i i Â·kÂ·* -4 1.- .... 7. 1, I i: 1 ./1 1 1 - 1 D--1 11 L _ 'I ' 7 ltÂ© 1 I 11 L L i- 4 1 --- â€¢L 1 L -1 / 1 -7 0 - L L- /1 1 11 L L L - 4- 8 ' 5ECOMP FL, 4 4/ 1 (8ELEY./_STAIRTOWER_-_THIRD_FLOOR i 1 0 1 . \\ rix 47.1 V I /7 11 11 , 1, I 4~ ah \ 4'-10 -- / 7\ A 1 9 .Â«-0. - __ ------ T --- --------- T T - 1 1 1\ -r \-1 Nk\ 2 4. 4.- ' Or 1 \\\\ L6\ \Â«j ;. .ll ' \.3 -,211\ .O 1, J L~~ -1 4 \ LA 11 1 \ L+ i 21- ~ 1 4_ 1 *fouNIP FL. 4 1 \ L* r 3 1 1 1 DIJ - - b -u~ - - U r Â£ 1 432/ 1 1 1-2 i , 4 _ ELEV, df 1 - crâ€¢ ' #bEMEKET- 1 Â» A. -4- 0 ...10 2-EL:EY../_STAIR TOWER - SECOND FLOOR ra ISSUE: FE 5/ 1% - ELEV. / STAIR TOWER - SECTION /h ELEV. / STAIR TOWER - SECTION 7 23'- REVISIONS: 4- - -.. 11- d 1\ , 4,-3" |i)-i k 4-10" A Ao -1 -- -- --M - 9 1 y - 1 IT . . 1 9 1 â‚¬ i Â·Â· 1..1....~. a 1 - 41 1 1 0.1. 1 0. UP b e 19 1 1 13 + 01 - 9 h w A-71 'i'* -GdvÂ· % 4 & t. 1 = FA A & 1 ELE V. 4 E O , /-) ELEV. / STAIR TOWER - GROUND FLOOR A7.1 . Â©1988 HAI;MAN YAWARCHITECTS, LT[1 T - -